This is a modern-English version of Sartor Resartus, and On Heroes, Hero-Worship, and the Heroic in History, originally written by Carlyle, Thomas.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
EVERYMAN’S LIBRARY
Everyman's Library
Founded 1906 by J. M. Dent (d. 1926)
Edited by Ernest Rhys (d. 1946)
Founded in 1906 by J. M. Dent (d. 1926)
Edited by Ernest Rhys (d. 1946)
ESSAYS & BELLES-LETTRES
Essays & Creative Writing
SARTOR RESARTUS and ON HEROES
SARTOR RESARTUS and ON HEROES
BY THOMAS CARLYLE · INTRODUCTION
BY THOMAS CARLYLE · INTRODUCTION
BY PROFESSOR W. H. HUDSON
BY PROFESSOR W. H. HUDSON
SARTOR RESARTUS
ON HEROES
HERO WORSHIP
THOMAS CARLYLE
LONDON: J. M. DENT & SONS LTD.
NEW YORK: E. P. DUTTON & CO. INC.
LONDON: J. M. DENT & SONS LTD.
NEW YORK: E. P. DUTTON & CO. INC.
All rights reserved
Made in Great Britain
at The Temple Press Letchworth
for
J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd.
Aldine House Bedford St. London
First published in this edition 1908
Last reprinted 1948
All rights reserved
Made in Great Britain
at The Temple Press Letchworth
for
J.M. Dent & Sons Ltd.
Aldine House Bedford St. London
First published in this edition 1908
Last reprinted 1948
INTRODUCTION
One of the most vital and pregnant books in our modern literature, “Sartor Resartus” is also, in structure and form, one of the most daringly original. It defies exact classification. It is not a philosophic treatise. It is not an autobiography. It is not a romance. Yet in a sense it is all these combined. Its underlying purpose is to expound in broad outline certain ideas which lay at the root of Carlyle’s whole reading of life. But he does not elect to set these forth in regular methodic fashion, after the manner of one writing a systematic essay. He presents his philosophy in dramatic form and in a picturesque human setting. He invents a certain Herr Diogenes Teufelsdröckh, an erudite German professor of “Allerley-Wissenschaft,” or Things in General, in the University of Weissnichtwo, of whose colossal work, “Die Kleider, Ihr Werden und Wirken” (On Clothes: Their Origin and Influence), he represents himself as being only the student and interpreter. With infinite humour he explains how this prodigious volume came into his hands; how he was struck with amazement by its encyclopædic learning, and the depth and suggestiveness of its thought; and how he determined that it was his special mission to introduce its ideas to the British public. But how was this to be done? As a mere bald abstract of the original would never do, the would-be apostle was for a time in despair. But at length the happy thought occurred to him of combining a condensed statement of the main principles of the new philosophy with some account of the philosopher’s life and character. Thus the work took the form of a “Life and Opinions of Herr Teufelsdröckh,” and as such it was offered to the world. Here, of course, we reach the explanation of its fantastic title—“Sartor Resartus,” or the Tailor Patched: the tailor being the great German “Clothes-philosopher,” and the patching being done by Carlyle as his English editor.
One of the most important and insightful books in our modern literature, “Sartor Resartus” is also one of the most creatively original in its structure and form. It challenges clear classification. It isn’t a philosophical treatise. It isn’t an autobiography. It isn’t a romance. Yet, in a way, it combines elements of all these genres. Its main goal is to outline certain ideas that form the foundation of Carlyle’s entire perspective on life. But he chooses not to present these ideas in a structured, methodical way like someone writing a systematic essay. Instead, he shares his philosophy in a dramatic style and within a vivid human context. He creates a character named Herr Diogenes Teufelsdröckh, an educated German professor of “Allerley-Wissenschaft,” or Things in General, at the University of Weissnichtwo, of whose massive work, “Die Kleider, Ihr Werden und Wirken” (On Clothes: Their Origin and Influence), he claims to be just a student and interpreter. With great humor, he describes how he came to possess this enormous book; how he was blown away by its vast knowledge and the depth of its ideas; and how he decided it was his mission to bring its concepts to the British public. But how would he do that? A simple summary of the original wouldn’t work, and the aspiring messenger was initially in despair. Eventually, though, he had the brilliant idea to merge a concise explanation of the main principles of the new philosophy with some details about the philosopher’s life and character. Thus, the work took the shape of a “Life and Opinions of Herr Teufelsdröckh,” and it was presented to the world as such. Here, of course, we find the meaning behind its unusual title—“Sartor Resartus,” or the Tailor Patched: the tailor being the renowned German “Clothes-philosopher,” and the patching being done by Carlyle as his English editor.
As a piece of literary mystification, Teufelsdröckh and viiihis treatise enjoyed a measure of the success which nearly twenty years before had been scored by Dietrich Knickerbocker and his “History of New York.” The question of the professor’s existence was solemnly discussed in at least one important review; Carlyle was gravely taken to task for attempting to mislead the public; a certain interested reader actually wrote to inquire where the original German work was to be obtained. All this seems to us surprising; the more so as we are now able to understand the purposes which Carlyle had in view in devising his dramatic scheme. In the first place, by associating the clothes-philosophy with the personality of its alleged author (himself one of Carlyle’s splendidly living pieces of characterisation), and by presenting it as the product and expression of his spiritual experiences, he made the mystical creed intensely human. Stated in the abstract, it would have been a mere blank -ism; developed in its intimate relations with Teufelsdröckh’s character and career, it is filled with the hot life-blood of natural thought and feeling. Secondly, by fathering his own philosophy upon a German professor Carlyle indicates his own indebtedness to German idealism, the ultimate source of much of his own teaching. Yet, deep as that indebtedness was, and anxious as he might be to acknowledge it, he was as a humourist keenly alive to certain glaring defects of the great German writers; to their frequent tendency to lose themselves among the mere minutiæ of erudition, and thus to confuse the unimportant and the important; to their habit of rising at times into the clouds rather than above the clouds, and of there disporting themselves in regions “close-bordering on the impalpable inane;” to their too conspicuous want of order, system, perspective. The dramatic machinery of “Sartor Resartus” is therefore turned to a third service. It is made the vehicle of much good-humoured satire upon these and similar characteristics of Teutonic scholarship and speculation; as in the many amusing criticisms which are passed upon Teufelsdröckh’s volume as a sort of “mad banquet wherein all courses have been confounded;” in the burlesque parade of the professor’s “omniverous reading” (e.g., Book I, Chap. V); and in the whole amazing episode of the “six considerable paper bags,” out of the chaotic contents of which the distracted editor in search of “biographic ixdocuments” has to make what he can. Nor is this quite all. Teufelsdröckh is further utilised as the mouthpiece of some of Carlyle’s more extravagant speculations and of such ideas as he wished to throw out as it were tentatively, and without himself being necessarily held responsible for them. There is thus much point as well as humour in those sudden turns of the argument, when, after some exceptionally wild outburst on his eidolon’s part, Carlyle sedately reproves him for the fantastic character or dangerous tendency of his opinions.
As a piece of literary mystification, Teufelsdröckh and viiihis treatise achieved a level of success similar to that of Dietrich Knickerbocker and his “History of New York” nearly twenty years earlier. The question of whether the professor really existed was seriously debated in at least one major review; Carlyle was earnestly criticized for trying to mislead the public; and a curious reader even wrote asking where to find the original German text. All of this seems surprising to us, especially since we now understand the intentions Carlyle had in creating his dramatic scheme. First, by linking the philosophy of clothes to the personality of its supposed author (who himself is one of Carlyle’s brilliantly crafted characters), and presenting it as a reflection of his spiritual experiences, he made the mystical creed deeply relatable. Stated abstractly, it would have been nothing more than a vague -ism; but when developed in connection with Teufelsdröckh’s character and life, it is infused with the vibrant passions of genuine thought and feeling. Secondly, by attributing his philosophy to a German professor, Carlyle acknowledges his own debt to German idealism, which greatly influenced his teachings. Yet, as much as he valued that influence and wanted to recognize it, he was also a humorist who was acutely aware of some glaring flaws in the great German writers; their frequent tendency to get lost in trivial details, blurring the line between the insignificant and the significant; their habit of sometimes ascending into the clouds instead of beyond them, frolicking in realms “close-bordering on the impalpable inane;” and their clear lack of order, system, and perspective. Therefore, the dramatic framework of “Sartor Resartus” serves another purpose. It becomes a means for good-natured satire on these and similar traits of German scholarship and speculation; as seen in the many amusing critiques of Teufelsdröckh’s work, described as a sort of “mad banquet wherein all courses have been confounded;” in the comical display of the professor’s “omnivorous reading” (e.g., Book I, Chap. V); and in the entire amusing incident of the “six considerable paper bags,” from which the frazzled editor must salvage what he can while searching for “biographic ixdocuments.” And that’s not all. Teufelsdröckh also serves as the voice for some of Carlyle’s more extreme speculations and ideas he wanted to propose tentatively, without personally being held accountable for them. There’s a lot of wit as well as insight in those sudden shifts in argument, when after one particularly wild assertion from his eidolon, Carlyle calmly scolds him for the absurd or potentially dangerous nature of his views.
It is in connection with the dramatic scheme of the book that the third element, that of autobiography, enters into its texture, for the story of Teufelsdröckh is very largely a transfigured version of the story of Carlyle himself. In saying this, I am not of course thinking mainly of Carlyle’s outer life. This, indeed, is in places freely drawn upon, as the outer lives of Dickens, George Eliot, Tolstoi are drawn upon in “David Copperfield,” “The Mill on the Floss,” “Anna Karénina.” Entepfuhl is only another name for Ecclefechan; the picture of little Diogenes eating his supper out-of-doors on fine summer evenings, and meanwhile watching the sun sink behind the western hills, is clearly a loving transcript from memory; even the idyllic episode of Blumine may be safely traced back to a romance of Carlyle’s youth. But to investigate the connection at these and other points between the mere externals of the two careers is a matter of little more than curious interest. It is because it incorporates and reproduces so much of Carlyle’s inner history that the story of Teufelsdröckh is really important. Spiritually considered, the whole narrative is, in fact, a “symbolic myth,” in which the writer’s personal trials and conflicts are depicted with little change save in setting and accessories. Like Teufelsdröckh, Carlyle while still a young man had broken away from the old religious creed in which he had been bred; like Teufelsdröckh, he had thereupon passed into the “howling desert of infidelity;” like Teufelsdröckh, he had known all the agonies and anguish of a long period of blank scepticism and insurgent despair, during which, turn whither he would, life responded with nothing but negations to every question and appeal. And as to Teufelsdröckh in the Rue Saint-Thomas de l’Enfer in Paris, so to Carlyle in Leith xWalk, Edinburgh, there had come a moment of sudden and marvellous illumination, a mystical crisis from which he had emerged a different man. The parallelism is so obvious and so close as to leave no room for doubt that the story of Teufelsdröckh is substantially a piece of spiritual autobiography.
It’s in relation to the book’s dramatic structure that the third element, autobiography, weaves into its fabric, because the story of Teufelsdröckh is largely a transformed version of Carlyle’s own story. I don’t mean to focus mainly on Carlyle's outer life. While that is certainly drawn upon, similar to how Dickens, George Eliot, and Tolstoy's outer lives are represented in “David Copperfield,” “The Mill on the Floss,” and “Anna Karenina.” Entepfuhl is just another name for Ecclefechan; the image of little Diogenes enjoying his dinner outside on beautiful summer evenings while watching the sun set behind the western hills is obviously a cherished memory. Even the idyllic episode with Blumine can be traced back to a romance from Carlyle's youth. But exploring the connections between the external details of both lives is mostly just a matter of curiosity. The story of Teufelsdröckh is truly significant because it includes and reflects so much of Carlyle’s inner journey. Viewed spiritually, the entire narrative is essentially a “symbolic myth,” where the writer’s personal struggles and conflicts are portrayed with minimal changes, except for the setting and details. Like Teufelsdröckh, Carlyle also broke away from the old religious beliefs he was raised with while still young; like Teufelsdröckh, he then entered the “howling desert of infidelity;” like Teufelsdröckh, he experienced the pain and anguish of a long phase of blank skepticism and rising despair, during which, no matter where he turned, life answered his every question and plea with nothing but negations. Just as Teufelsdröckh found enlightenment in Rue Saint-Thomas de l’Enfer in Paris, Carlyle also had a moment of sudden and amazing illumination in Leith Walk, Edinburgh, which transformed him into a different person. The similarities are so clear and close that there's no doubt the story of Teufelsdröckh is fundamentally a piece of spiritual autobiography.
This admitted, the question arises whether Carlyle had any purpose, beyond that of self-expression, in thus utilising his own experiences for the human setting of his philosophy. It seems evident that he had. As he conceived them, these experiences possessed far more than a merely personal interest and meaning. He wrote of himself because he saw in himself a type of his restless and much-troubled epoch; because he knew that in a broad sense his history was the history of thousands of other young men in the generation to which he belonged. The age which followed upon the vast upheaval of the Revolution was one of widespread turmoil and perplexity. Men felt themselves to be wandering aimlessly “between two worlds, one dead, the other powerless to be born.” The old order had collapsed in shapeless ruin; but the promised Utopia had not been realised to take its place. In many directions the forces of reaction were at work. Religion, striving to maintain itself upon the dogmatic creeds of the past, was rapidly petrifying into a mere “dead Letter of Religion,” from which all the living spirit had fled; and those who could not nourish themselves on hearsay and inherited formula knew not where to look for the renewal of faith and hope. The generous ardour and the splendid humanitarian enthusiasms which had been stirred by the opening phases of the revolutionary movement, had now ebbed away; revulsion had followed, and with it the mood of disillusion and despair. The spirit of doubt and denial was felt as a paralysing power in every department of life and thought, and the shadow of unbelief lay heavy on many hearts.
This being acknowledged, the question arises whether Carlyle had any purpose, beyond self-expression, in using his own experiences to set the stage for his philosophy. It seems clear that he did. As he saw it, these experiences held much more than just personal significance and meaning. He wrote about himself because he recognized in himself a representation of his restless and troubled times; because he understood that, broadly speaking, his story was the story of thousands of other young men from his generation. The era that followed the massive upheaval of the Revolution was marked by widespread confusion and turmoil. People felt lost, wandering "between two worlds, one dead, the other powerless to be born." The old order had crumbled into chaos, but the promised Utopia had not emerged to replace it. In many areas, reactionary forces were at work. Religion, struggling to stay relevant on the dogmatic beliefs of the past, was quickly becoming a mere "dead Letter of Religion," devoid of any living spirit; and those who could not sustain themselves on hearsay and traditional formulas had no idea where to seek renewal of faith and hope. The generous passion and inspiring humanitarian motivations that had been ignited by the early stages of the revolutionary movement had now faded; disillusionment had set in, bringing with it feelings of despair. The spirit of doubt and denial was felt as a paralyzing force in all aspects of life and thought, and the weight of disbelief weighed heavily on many hearts.
It was for the men of this “sad time” that Carlyle wrote Teufelsdröckh’s story; and he wrote it not merely to depict the far-reaching consequences of their pessimism but also to make plain to them their true path out of it. He desired to exhibit to his age the real nature of the strange malady from which it was suffering in order that he might thereupon proclaim the remedy.
It was for the men of this “sad time” that Carlyle wrote Teufelsdröckh’s story; and he wrote it not just to show the far-reaching effects of their pessimism but also to make it clear to them the real way out of it. He wanted to reveal to his generation the true nature of the strange ailment they were experiencing so that he could then announce the cure.
We must begin by understanding his diagnosis. For him, all the evils of the time could ultimately be traced back to their common source in what may be briefly described as its want of real religion. Of churches and creeds there were plenty; of living faith little or nothing was left. Men had lost all vital sense of God in the world; and because of this, they had taken up a fatally wrong attitude to life. They looked at it wholly from the mechanical point of view, and judged it by merely utilitarian standards. The “body-politic” was no longer inspired by any “soul-politic.” Men, individually and in the mass, cared only for material prosperity, sought only outward success, made the pursuit of happiness the end and aim of their being. The divine meaning of virtue, the infinite nature of duty, had been forgotten, and morality had been turned into a sort of ledger-philosophy, based upon calculations of profit and loss.
We need to start by understanding his diagnosis. For him, all the problems of the time could ultimately be traced back to a lack of genuine religion. There were plenty of churches and beliefs, but very little real faith remained. People had lost all genuine awareness of God in the world, and because of this, they had adopted a dangerously misguided attitude toward life. They viewed everything solely from a mechanical perspective and evaluated it based on purely practical standards. The "body politic" was no longer inspired by any "soul politic." Individuals and society as a whole only cared about material wealth, aimed solely for external success, and made the pursuit of happiness the main goal of their existence. The divine significance of virtue and the infinite nature of duty had been forgotten, turning morality into a kind of ledger-based philosophy focused on calculations of profit and loss.
It was thus that Carlyle read the signs of the times. In such circumstances what was needed? Nothing less than a spiritual rebirth. Men must abandon their wrong attitude to life, and take up the right attitude. Everything hinged on that. And that they might take up this right attitude it was necessary first that they should be convinced of life’s essential spirituality, and cease in consequence to seek its meaning and test its value on the plane of merely material things.
It was in this way that Carlyle understood the signs of his time. Given these circumstances, what was needed? Nothing short of a spiritual awakening. People had to let go of their misguided approach to life and adopt the right mindset. Everything depended on that. For them to embrace this new attitude, it was essential that they first recognized the fundamental spirituality of life and stop trying to find its meaning and measure its worth solely in material terms.
Carlyle thus throws passionate emphasis upon religion as the only saving power. But it must be noted that he does not suggest a return to any of the dogmatic creeds of the past. Though once the expression of a living faith, these were now for him mere lifeless formulas. Nor has he any new dogmatic creed to offer in their place. That mystical crisis which had broken the spell of the Everlasting No was in a strict sense—he uses the word himself—a conversion. But it was not a conversion in the theological sense, for it did not involve the acceptance of any specific articles of faith. It was simply a complete change of front; the protest of his whole nature, in a suddenly aroused mood of indignation and defiance, against the “spirit which denies;” the assertion xiiof his manhood against the cowardice which had so long kept him trembling and whimpering before the facts of existence. But from that change of front came presently the vivid apprehension of certain great truths which his former mood had thus far concealed from him; and in these truths he found the secret of that right attitude to life in the discovery of which lay men’s only hope of salvation from the unrest and melancholy of their time.
Carlyle passionately emphasizes that religion is the only saving power. However, it's important to note that he doesn't advocate for a return to any of the dogmatic beliefs of the past. Although these beliefs once expressed a living faith, for him, they have become lifeless formulas. He also doesn't propose any new dogmatic creed to replace them. That mystical crisis which broke the hold of the Everlasting No was, in a strict sense—he uses the term himself—a conversion. But it wasn't a conversion in the theological sense, as it didn't involve accepting any specific articles of faith. It was merely a complete change of perspective; a protest from his entire being, suddenly fueled by a sense of indignation and defiance, against the “spirit that denies;” an assertion of his manhood against the cowardice that had kept him trembling and whimpering before the realities of existence. From that change in perspective came a clear understanding of certain profound truths that his previous mindset had hidden from him; and within these truths, he discovered the key to the right attitude toward life, which offered humanity's only hope for salvation from the unrest and melancholy of their time.
From this point of view the burden of Carlyle’s message to his generation will be readily understood. Men were going wrong because they started with the thought of self, and made satisfaction of self the law of their lives; because, in consequence, they regarded happiness as the chief object of pursuit and the one thing worth striving for; because, under the influence of the current rationalism, they tried to escape from their spiritual perplexities through logic and speculation. They had, therefore, to set themselves right upon all these matters. They had to learn that not self-satisfaction but self-renunciation is the key to life and its true law; that we have no prescriptive claim to happiness and no business to quarrel with the universe if it withholds it from us; that the way out of pessimism lies, not through reason, but through honest work, steady adherence to the simple duty which each day brings, fidelity to the right as we know it. Such, in broad statement, is the substance of Carlyle’s religious convictions and moral teaching. Like Kant he takes his stand on the principles of ethical idealism. God is to be sought, not through speculation, or syllogism, or the learning of the schools, but through the moral nature. It is the soul in action that alone finds God. And the finding of God means, not happiness as the world conceives it, but blessedness, or the inward peace which passes understanding.
From this perspective, it's easy to grasp Carlyle’s message to his generation. People were going astray because they began with a focus on self and made self-fulfillment the guiding principle of their lives; as a result, they viewed happiness as the ultimate goal and the only thing worth striving for. Influenced by the prevailing rationalism, they sought to escape their spiritual struggles through logic and speculation. Therefore, they needed to correct their views on all these issues. They had to realize that it’s not self-satisfaction but self-denial that holds the key to life and serves as its true law; that we have no inherent right to happiness and no reason to argue with the universe if it denies it to us; that the way to overcome pessimism lies not in reasoning but in genuine hard work, consistent dedication to the simple duties each day brings, and loyalty to what is right as we perceive it. This, in broad terms, captures the essence of Carlyle’s religious beliefs and moral teachings. Like Kant, he bases his stance on the principles of ethical idealism. God should be sought not through speculation, syllogism, or academic learning, but through moral integrity. It is the soul in action that truly discovers God. Discovering God means not happiness as the world understands it, but blessedness, or the inner peace that surpasses comprehension.
The connection between the transfigured autobiography which serves to introduce the directly didactic element of the book and that element itself, will now be clear. Stripped of its whimsicalities of phraseology and its humorous extravagances, Carlyle’s philosophy stands revealed as essentially idealistic in character. Spirit is the only reality. Visible things are but the manifestations, emblems, or clothings of spirit. The material universe itself is only the vesture or symbol of God; man is a spirit, though he wears the xiiiwrappings of the flesh; and in everything that man creates for himself he merely attempts to give body or expression to thought. The science of Carlyle’s time was busy proclaiming that, since the universe is governed by natural laws, miracles are impossible and the supernatural is a myth. Carlyle replies that the natural laws are themselves only the manifestation of Spiritual Force, and that thus miracle is everywhere and all nature supernatural. We, who are the creatures of time and space, can indeed apprehend the Absolute only when He weaves about Him the visible garments of time and space. Thus God reveals Himself to sense through symbols. But it is as we regard these symbols in one or other of two possible ways that we class ourselves with the foolish man or with the wise. The foolish man sees only the symbol, thinks it exists for itself, takes it for the ultimate fact, and therefore rests in it. The wise man sees the symbol, knows that it is only a symbol, and penetrates into it for the ultimate fact or spiritual reality which it symbolises.
The connection between the transformed autobiography that introduces the book's directly educational element and that element itself will now be clear. Stripped of its quirky phrasing and humorous exaggerations, Carlyle’s philosophy reveals itself to be fundamentally idealistic. Spirit is the only reality. Visible things are merely the expressions, symbols, or coverings of spirit. The material universe itself is just the clothing or symbol of God; man is a spirit, even though he is encased in flesh. In everything that man creates, he merely tries to give form or expression to thought. The science of Carlyle’s time was busy claiming that, since the universe is governed by natural laws, miracles are impossible and the supernatural is a myth. Carlyle counters that the natural laws are themselves just the manifestation of Spiritual Force, and that therefore miracles are everywhere and all of nature is supernatural. We, who exist in time and space, can truly grasp the Absolute only when He surrounds Himself with the visible garments of time and space. Thus, God reveals Himself to our senses through symbols. However, how we regard these symbols categorizes us as either foolish or wise. The foolish person sees only the symbol, believes it exists for itself, takes it as the ultimate truth, and therefore settles for it. The wise person sees the symbol, understands that it is just a symbol, and looks deeper for the ultimate truth or spiritual reality that it represents.
Remote as such a doctrine may at first sight seem to be from the questions with which men are commonly concerned, it has none the less many important practical bearings. Since “all Forms whereby Spirit manifests itself to sense, whether outwardly or in the imagination, are Clothes,” civilisation and everything belonging to it—our languages, literatures and arts, our governments, social machinery and institutions, our philosophies, creeds and rituals—are but so many vestments woven for itself by the shaping spirit of man. Indispensable these vestments are; for without them society would collapse in anarchy, and humanity sink to the level of the brute. Yet here again we must emphasise the difference, already noted, between the foolish man and the wise. The foolish man once more assumes that the vestments exist for themselves, as ultimate facts, and that they have a value of their own. He, therefore, confuses the life with its clothing; is even willing to sacrifice the life for the sake of the clothing. The wise man, while he, too, recognises the necessity of the vestments, and indeed insists upon it, knows that they have no independent importance, that they derive all their potency and value from the inner reality which they were fashioned to represent and embody, but which they often misrepresent and obscure. He therefore xivnever confuses the life with the clothing, and well understands how often the clothing has to be sacrificed for the sake of the life. Thus, while the utility of clothes has to be recognised to the full, it is still of the essence of wisdom to press hard upon the vital distinction between the outer wrappings of man’s life and that inner reality which they more or less adequately enfold.
Remote as this idea may seem at first glance from the issues people usually care about, it still has many important practical implications. Since “all forms through which spirit expresses itself to the senses, whether outwardly or in the imagination, are clothes,” civilization and everything that comes with it—our languages, literatures and arts, our governments, social systems and institutions, our philosophies, beliefs, and rituals—are just various garments created by the shaping spirit of humanity. These garments are essential; without them, society would break down into chaos, and humanity would revert to a primitive state. Yet again, we must highlight the difference, as previously mentioned, between the foolish person and the wise one. The foolish person mistakenly believes that these garments exist for their own sake, as ultimate truths, and that they hold inherent worth. Therefore, he confuses life with its clothing; he may even be willing to sacrifice life for the sake of clothing. The wise person, while also recognizing the necessity of these garments and indeed insists upon it, understands that they have no independent significance, that all their power and value come from the inner reality they were meant to represent and embody, but often misrepresent and obscure. He never confuses life with clothing and knows well how often clothing needs to be sacrificed for the sake of life. Thus, while the usefulness of clothing must be fully acknowledged, it is vital to emphasize the important distinction between the outer wrappings of a person's life and the inner reality that they more or less adequately envelop.
The use which Carlyle makes of this doctrine in his interpretation of the religious history of the world and of the crisis in thought of his own day, will be anticipated. All dogmas, forms and ceremonials, he teaches, are but religious vestments—symbols expressing man’s deepest sense of the divine mystery of the universe and the hunger and thirst of his soul for God. It is in response to the imperative necessities of his nature that he moulds for himself these outward emblems of his ideas and aspirations. Yet they are only emblems; and since, like all other human things, they partake of the ignorance and weakness of the times in which they were framed, it is inevitable that with the growth of knowledge and the expansion of thought they must presently be outgrown. When this happens, there follows what Carlyle calls the “superannuation of symbols.” Men wake to the fact that the creeds and formulas which have come down to them from the past are no longer living for them, no longer what they need for the embodiment of their spiritual life. Two mistakes are now possible, and these are, indeed, commonly made together. On the one hand, men may try to ignore the growth of knowledge and the expansion of thought, and to cling to the outgrown symbols as things having in themselves some mysterious sanctity and power. On the other hand, they may recklessly endeavour to cast aside the reality symbolised along with the discredited symbol itself. Given such a condition of things, and we shall find religion degenerating into formalism and the worship of the dead letter, and, side by side with this, the impatient rejection of all religion, and the spread of a crude and debasing materialism. Religious symbols, then, must be renewed. But their renewal can come only from within. Form, to have any real value, must grow out of life and be fed by it.
The way Carlyle uses this idea to interpret the religious history of the world and the intellectual crisis of his time is something we can expect. He teaches that all doctrines, rituals, and ceremonies are merely religious garments—symbols that reflect humanity’s deepest understanding of the divine mystery of the universe and the longing of the soul for God. In response to his inherent needs, he creates these outward symbols of his thoughts and desires. However, they are just symbols; and since, like everything human, they share the ignorance and limitations of the times in which they were created, it’s only natural that as knowledge and thought evolve, they will eventually be outgrown. When this occurs, it leads to what Carlyle refers to as the “superannuation of symbols.” People realize that the beliefs and formulas handed down to them from the past are no longer alive for them, no longer fitting for expressing their spiritual life. At this point, two mistakes often arise, typically occurring together. On one hand, people might ignore the advancement of knowledge and thought, clinging to outdated symbols as if they possess some mysterious sanctity and power. On the other hand, they might carelessly attempt to dismiss the reality represented by the discredited symbol altogether. In such a scenario, we see religion decline into formalism and the worship of the dead letter, while simultaneously there’s a rash rejection of all religion and a rise of crude, degrading materialism. Therefore, religious symbols need to be revitalized. But this renewal must come from within. Form, to have any real significance, must arise from life and be nourished by it.
The revolutionary quality in the philosophy of “Sartor Resartus” cannot, of course, be overlooked. Everything xvthat man has woven for himself must in time become merely “old clothes”; the work of his thought, like that of his hands, is perishable; his very highest symbols have no permanence or finality. Carlyle cuts down to the essential reality beneath all shows and forms and emblems: witness his amazing vision of a naked House of Lords. Under his penetrating gaze the “earthly hulls and garnitures” of existence melt away. Men’s habit is to rest in symbols. But to rest in symbols is fatal, since they are at best but the “adventitious wrappages” of life. Clothes “have made men of us”—true; but now, so great has their influence become that “they are threatening to make clothes-screens of us.” Hence “the beginning of all wisdom is to look fixedly on clothes … till they become transparent.” The logical tendency of such teaching may seem to be towards utter nihilism. But that tendency is checked and qualified by the strong conservative element which is everywhere prominent in Carlyle’s thought. Upon the absolute need of “clothes” the stress is again and again thrown. They “have made men of us.” By symbols alone man lives and works. By symbols alone can he make life and work effective. Thus even the world’s “old clothes”—its discarded forms and creeds—should be treated with the reverence due to whatever has once played a part in human development. Thus, moreover, we must be on our guard against the impetuosity of the revolutionary spirit and all rash rupture with the past. To cast old clothes aside before new clothes are ready—this does not mean progress, but sansculottism, or a lapse into nakedness and anarchy.
The revolutionary aspect of “Sartor Resartus” is impossible to ignore. Everything xv that people create for themselves eventually becomes just “old clothes”; the products of their thoughts, just like those of their hands, are temporary; even our highest ideals lack permanence or finality. Carlyle gets to the essential truth beneath all appearances, forms, and symbols: just look at his incredible vision of a bare House of Lords. Under his keen observation, the “earthly hulls and garnishments” of existence dissolve. People tend to rely on symbols. But depending on symbols is dangerous since they are, at best, merely the “extra wrappings” of life. Clothes “have made men of us”—that’s true; but now, their influence has grown so strong that “they are threatening to make clothes-screens of us.” Therefore, “the beginning of all wisdom is to look closely at clothes… until they become transparent.” The logical outcome of such teaching might seem to lead to complete nihilism. However, this tendency is tempered by the strong conservative aspect that is always present in Carlyle’s ideas. The absolute necessity of “clothes” is emphasized repeatedly. They “have made men of us.” Through symbols alone, humanity lives and works. Only with symbols can we make life and work meaningful. Thus, even the world’s “old clothes”—its outdated forms and beliefs—should be respected for whatever role they have played in human development. Furthermore, we must be cautious of the impulsive revolutionary spirit and any rash break with the past. Discarding old clothes before new ones are ready doesn’t signify progress; it leads to sansculottism, or a descent into nakedness and chaos.
The lectures “On Heroes and Hero-Worship,” here printed with “Sartor Resartus,” contain little more than an amplification, through a series of brilliant character-studies, of those fundamental ideas of history which had already figured among Teufelsdröckh’s social speculations. Simple in statement and clear in doctrine, this second work needs no formal introduction. It may, however, be of service just to indicate one or two points at which, apart from its set theses, it expresses or implies certain underlying principles of all Carlyle’s thought.
The lectures "On Heroes and Hero-Worship," published here with "Sartor Resartus," mainly expand on the essential historical ideas that were already present in Teufelsdröckh's social theories, using a series of insightful character studies. Simple in expression and clear in message, this second work doesn't require a formal introduction. However, it might be helpful to point out one or two areas where, beyond its main arguments, it reveals or suggests some fundamental principles of Carlyle’s overall thought.
In the first place, his philosophy of history rests entirely on “the great man theory.” “Universal History, the xvihistory of what man has accomplished in the world,” is for him “at bottom the History of the Great Men who have worked here.” This conception, of course, brings him into sharp conflict with that scientific view of history which was already gaining ground when “Heroes and Hero-Worship” was written, and which since then has become even more popular under the powerful influence of the modern doctrine of evolution. A scientific historian, like Buckle or Taine, seeks to explain all changes in thought, all movements in politics and society, in terms of general laws; his habit is, therefore, to subordinate, if not quite to eliminate, the individual; the greatest man is treated as in a large measure the product and expression of the “spirit of the time.” For Carlyle, individuality is everything. While, as he is bound to admit, “no one works save under conditions,” external circumstances and influences count little. The Great Man is supreme. He is not the creature of his age, but its creator; not its servant, but its master. “The History of the World is but the Biography of Great Men.”
In the first place, his philosophy of history is based entirely on “the great man theory.” “Universal History, the history of what humanity has accomplished in the world,” is for him “essentially the History of the Great Men who have made an impact.” This viewpoint, of course, puts him in direct conflict with the scientific perspective on history that was already emerging when “Heroes and Hero-Worship” was written, and which has since gained even more traction thanks to the strong influence of the modern theory of evolution. A scientific historian, like Buckle or Taine, tries to explain all shifts in thought, all political and social movements, using general laws; their approach tends to downplay, if not completely dismiss, the individual; the greatest man is largely seen as a product and reflection of the “spirit of the time.” For Carlyle, individuality is everything. While he has to acknowledge that “no one acts without context,” external circumstances and influences matter little. The Great Man is supreme. He is not shaped by his era, but rather defines it; not its servant, but its leader. “The History of the World is just the Biography of Great Men.”
Anti-scientific in his reading of history, Carlyle is also anti-democratic in the practical lessons he deduces from it. He teaches that our right relations with the Hero are discipular relations; that we should honestly acknowledge his superiority, look up to him, reverence him. Thus on the personal side he challenges that tendency to “level down” which he believed to be one alarming result of the fast-spreading spirit of the new democracy. But more than this. He insists that the one hope for our distracted world of to-day lies in the strength and wisdom of the few, not in the organised unwisdom of the many. The masses of the people can never be safely trusted to solve for themselves the intricate problems of their own welfare. They need to be guided, disciplined, at times even driven, by those great leaders of men, who see more deeply than they see into the reality of things, and know much better than they can ever know what is good for them, and how that good is to be attained. Political machinery, in which the modern world had come to put so much faith, is only another delusion of a mechanical age. The burden of history is for him always the need of the Able Man. “I say, Find me the true Könning, King, Able Man, and he has a divine right over me.” Carlyle thus throws down the gauntlet at once xviito the scientific and to the democratic movements of his time. His pronounced antagonism to the modern spirit in these two most important manifestations must be kept steadily in mind in our study of him.
Anti-scientific in his interpretation of history, Carlyle is also anti-democratic in the practical lessons he draws from it. He teaches that our proper relationship with the Hero should be one of discipleship; we should genuinely acknowledge his superiority, look up to him, and revere him. Thus, on a personal level, he challenges the tendency to “level down,” which he saw as a troubling outcome of the rapidly spreading spirit of new democracy. But it goes further than that. He insists that the only hope for our chaotic world today lies in the strength and wisdom of the few, not in the organized ignorance of the many. The masses of people can never be safely trusted to solve the complex problems of their own well-being. They need to be guided, disciplined, and, at times, even driven by those great leaders who understand more deeply than they do the realities of life, and who know much better than they could ever know what is good for them and how to achieve that good. The political machinery, which the modern world has come to rely on so heavily, is just another illusion of a mechanical age. For him, the burden of history is always the need for the Able Man. “I say, Find me the true Könning, King, Able Man, and he has a divine right over me.” Carlyle therefore challenges both the scientific and the democratic movements of his time. His strong opposition to the modern spirit in these two crucial aspects must be kept firmly in mind as we study him.
Finally, we have to remember that in the whole tone and temper of his teaching Carlyle is fundamentally the Puritan. The dogmas of Puritanism he had indeed outgrown; but he never outgrew its ethics. His thought was dominated and pervaded to the end, as Froude rightly says, by the spirit of the creed he had dismissed. By reference to this one fact we may account for much of his strength, and also for most of his limitations in outlook and sympathy. Those limitations the reader will not fail to notice for himself. But whatever allowance has to be made for them, the strength remains. It is, perhaps, the secret of Carlyle’s imperishable greatness as a stimulating and uplifting power that, beyond any other modern writer, he makes us feel with him the supreme claims of the moral life, the meaning of our own responsibilities, the essential spirituality of things, the indestructible reality of religion. If he had thus a special message for his own generation, that message has surely not lost any of its value for ours. “Put Carlyle in your pocket,” says Dr. Hal to Paul Kelver on his starting out in life. “He is not all the voices, but he is the best maker of men I know.” And as a maker of men, Carlyle’s appeal to us is as great as ever.
Finally, we have to remember that in the overall tone and attitude of his teaching, Carlyle is fundamentally a Puritan. He had indeed moved beyond the dogmas of Puritanism; however, he never outgrew its ethics. His thoughts were influenced and filled, as Froude correctly says, by the spirit of the creed he had left behind. This single fact helps explain much of his strength, as well as most of his limitations in perspective and empathy. Readers will undoubtedly notice these limitations themselves. But no matter what allowances must be made for them, the strength remains. It could be the key to Carlyle’s lasting greatness as a motivating and uplifting force that, more than any other modern writer, makes us feel alongside him the supreme importance of the moral life, the meaning of our own responsibilities, the essential spirituality of things, and the undeniable reality of religion. If he had a special message for his own generation, that message has surely not lost any of its relevance for ours. “Put Carlyle in your pocket,” Dr. Hal tells Paul Kelver when he’s starting out in life. “He is not all the voices, but he is the best maker of men I know.” And in terms of shaping individuals, Carlyle’s appeal to us remains as strong as ever.
Life of Schiller (Lond. Mag., 1823-4), 1825, 1845. (Supplement published in the People’s Edition, 1873). Wilhelm Meister Apprenticeship, 1824. Elements of Geometry and Trigonometry (from the French of Legendre), 1824. German Romance, 1827. Sartor Resartus (Fraser’s Mag., 1833-4), 1835 (Boston), 1838. French Revolution, 1837, 1839. Critical and Miscellaneous Essays, 1839, 1840, 1847, 1857. (In these were reprinted Articles from Edinburgh Review, Foreign Review, Foreign Quarterly Review, Fraser’s Magazine, Westminster Review, New Monthly Magazine, London and Westminster Review, Keepsake Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, Times). Chartism, 1840. Heroes, Hero-worship, and the Heroic in History, 1841. Past and Present, 1843. Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches: with Elucidations, 1845. Thirty-five Unpublished Letters of Oliver Cromwell, 1847 (Fraser). Original Discourses on the Negro Question (Fraser, 1849), 1853. Latter-day Pamphlets, 1850. Life of John Sterling, 1851. History of Friedrich II. of Prussia, 1858-65. Inaugural Address at Edinburgh, 1866. Shooting xviiiNiagara: and After? 1867 (from “Macmillan”). The Early Kings of Norway; also an Essay on the Portraits of John Knox, 1875.
Life of Schiller (Lond. Mag., 1823-4), 1825, 1845. (Supplement published in the People’s Edition, 1873). Wilhelm Meister Apprenticeship, 1824. Elements of Geometry and Trigonometry (translated from the French by Legendre), 1824. German Romance, 1827. Sartor Resartus (Fraser’s Mag., 1833-4), 1835 (Boston), 1838. French Revolution, 1837, 1839. Critical and Miscellaneous Essays, 1839, 1840, 1847, 1857. (This collection includes articles originally published in Edinburgh Review, Foreign Review, Foreign Quarterly Review, Fraser’s Magazine, Westminster Review, New Monthly Magazine, London and Westminster Review, Keepsake Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, Times). Chartism, 1840. Heroes, Hero-worship, and the Heroic in History, 1841. Past and Present, 1843. Oliver Cromwell’s Letters and Speeches: with Elucidations, 1845. Thirty-five Unpublished Letters of Oliver Cromwell, 1847 (Fraser). Original Discourses on the Negro Question (Fraser, 1849), 1853. Latter-day Pamphlets, 1850. Life of John Sterling, 1851. History of Friedrich II. of Prussia, 1858-65. Inaugural Address at Edinburgh, 1866. Shooting xviiiNiagara: and After? 1867 (from “Macmillan”). The Early Kings of Norway; also an Essay on the Portraits of John Knox, 1875.
There were also contributions to Brewster’s Edinburgh Encyclopædia, vols. xiv., xv., and xvi.; to New Edinburgh Review, 1821, 1822; Fraser’s Magazine, 1830, 1831; The Times, 19 June, 1844 (“Mazzini”); 28 November, 1876; 5 May, 1877; Examiner, 1848; Spectator, 1848.
There were also contributions to Brewster’s Edinburgh Encyclopædia, vols. xiv., xv., and xvi.; to New Edinburgh Review, 1821, 1822; Fraser’s Magazine, 1830, 1831; The Times, June 19, 1844 (“Mazzini”); November 28, 1876; May 5, 1877; Examiner, 1848; Spectator, 1848.
First Collected Edition of Works, 1857-58 (16 vols.).
First Collected Edition of Works, 1857-58 (16 vols.).
Reminiscences, ed. by Froude in 1881, but superseded by C. E. Norton’s edition of 1887. Norton has also edited two volumes of Letters (1888), and Carlyle’s correspondence with Emerson (1883) and with Goethe (1887). Other volumes of correspondence are New Letters (1904), Carlyle Intime (1907), Love Letters (1909), Letters to Mill, Sterling, and Browning (1923), all ed. by Alexander Carlyle. See also Last Words of Carlyle, 1892.
Reminiscences, edited by Froude in 1881, was later replaced by C. E. Norton’s edition from 1887. Norton also edited two volumes of Letters (1888), as well as Carlyle’s correspondence with Emerson (1883) and with Goethe (1887). Other collections of correspondence include New Letters (1904), Carlyle Intime (1907), Love Letters (1909), and Letters to Mill, Sterling, and Browning (1923), all edited by Alexander Carlyle. Also, check out Last Words of Carlyle, 1892.
The fullest Life is that by D. A. Wilson. The first of six volumes appeared in 1923, and by 1934 only one remained to be published.
The most complete Life is by D. A. Wilson. The first of six volumes came out in 1923, and by 1934, only one was left to be published.
CONTENTS
SARTOR RESARTUS
CHAP. PAGE
CHAP. PAGE
- Preliminary 1
- Editorial Difficulties 5
- Reminiscences 9
- Characteristics 20
- The World in Clothes 25
- Aprons 31
- Miscellaneous-historical 34
- The World out of Clothes 37
- Adamitism 43
- Pure Reason 47
- Prospective 52
- Genesis 61
- Idyllic 68
- Pedagogy 76
- Getting under Way 90
- Romance 101
- Sorrows of Teufelsdröckh 112
- The Everlasting No 121
- Centre of Indifference 128
- The Everlasting Yea 138
- Pause 149
- Incident in Modern History 156
- Church-Clothes 161
- Symbols 163
- Helotage 170
- The Phœnix 174
- Old Clothes 179
- Organic Filaments 183
- Natural Supernaturalism 191
- Circumspective 201
- The Dandiacal Body 204
- Tailors 216
- Farewell 219
ON HEROES, HERO-WORSHIP, AND THE HEROIC IN HISTORY
The Hero as Divinity. Odin. Paganism: Scandinavian Mythology 239
The Hero as God. Odin. Paganism: Scandinavian Mythology 239
The Hero as Prophet. Mahomet: Islam 277
The Hero as Prophet. Muhammad: Islam __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
The Hero as Poet. Dante; Shakspeare 311
The Hero as Poet. Dante; Shakespeare __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
The Hero as Priest. Luther; Reformation: Knox; Puritanism 346
The Hero as a Priest. Luther; Reformation: Knox; Puritanism 346
The Hero as Man of Letters. Johnson, Rousseau, Burns 383
The Hero as a Writer. Johnson, Rousseau, Burns 383
SARTOR RESARTUS
BOOK FIRST
CHAPTER I
CHAPTER 1
PRELIMINARY
Considering our present advanced state of culture, and how the Torch of Science has now been brandished and borne about, with more or less effect, for five-thousand years and upwards; how, in these times especially, not only the Torch still burns, and perhaps more fiercely than ever, but innumerable Rush-lights, and Sulphur-matches, kindled thereat, are also glancing in every direction, so that not the smallest cranny or doghole in Nature or Art can remain unilluminated,—it might strike the reflective mind with some surprise that hitherto little or nothing of a fundamental character, whether in the way of Philosophy or History, has been written on the subject of Clothes.
Thinking about our current advanced state of culture, and how the Torch of Science has been held up and carried around, with varying degrees of impact, for over five thousand years; how, especially today, the Torch not only still burns, and maybe more brightly than ever, but countless little lights and matches kindled from it are also shining in all directions, ensuring that not the tiniest corner or hidden spot in Nature or Art remains unlit—it might surprise those who think deeply that so far, very little of a fundamental nature, whether in Philosophy or History, has been written about Clothes.
Our Theory of Gravitation is as good as perfect: Lagrange, it is well known, has proved that the Planetary System, on this scheme, will endure forever; Laplace, still more cunningly, even guesses that it could not have been made on any other scheme. Whereby, at least, our nautical Logbooks can be better kept; and water-transport of all kinds has grown more commodious. Of Geology and Geognosy we know enough: what with the labours of our Werners and Huttons, what with the ardent genius of their disciples, it has come about that now, to many a Royal Society, the Creation of a World is little more mysterious than the cooking of a dumpling; concerning which last, indeed, there have been minds to whom the question, How the apples were got in, presented difficulties. Why mention our disquisitions on the Social Contract, on the Standard 2of Taste, on the Migrations of the Herring? Then, have we not a Doctrine of Rent, a Theory of Value; Philosophies of Language, of History, of Pottery, of Apparitions, of Intoxicating Liquors? Man’s whole life and environment have been laid open and elucidated; scarcely a fragment or fibre of his Soul, Body, and Possessions, but has been probed, dissected, distilled, desiccated, and scientifically decomposed: our spiritual Faculties, of which it appears there are not a few, have their Stewarts, Cousins, Royer Collards: every cellular, vascular, muscular Tissue glories in its Lawrences, Majendies, Bichâts.
Our Theory of Gravitation is nearly perfect: Lagrange has shown that the Planetary System, based on this model, will last forever; Laplace, even more cleverly, suggests that it couldn't have been created any other way. As a result, our nautical logbooks can be kept better, and water transportation has become much more convenient. We know enough about Geology and Geognosy: thanks to the efforts of Werners and Huttons, and the passionate genius of their followers, the Creation of a World is now less mysterious to many Royal Societies than cooking a dumpling; regarding which, in fact, there have been some who found the question, How the apples were got in, quite challenging. Why even mention our discussions on the Social Contract, on the Standard 2 of Taste, on the Migrations of the Herring? We also have a Doctrine of Rent, a Theory of Value; Philosophies of Language, History, Pottery, Apparitions, and Intoxicating Drinks? Every aspect of human life and surroundings has been examined and explained; hardly a fragment or fiber of his Soul, Body, and Possessions has escaped being probed, dissected, distilled, dried, and scientifically broken down: our spiritual faculties, which seem to be numerous, have their Stewarts, Cousins, and Royer Collards; every cellular, vascular, and muscular tissue takes pride in its Lawrences, Majendies, and Bichâts.
How, then, comes it, may the reflective mind repeat, that the grand Tissue of all Tissues, the only real Tissue, should have been quite overlooked by Science,—the vestural Tissue, namely, of woollen or other cloth; which Man’s Soul wears as its outmost wrappage and overall; wherein his whole other Tissues are included and screened, his whole Faculties work, his whole Self lives, moves, and has its being? For if, now and then, some straggling, broken-winged thinker has cast an owl’s-glance into this obscure region, the most have soared over it altogether heedless; regarding Clothes as a property, not an accident, as quite natural and spontaneous, like the leaves of trees, like the plumage of birds. In all speculations they have tacitly figured man as a Clothed Animal; whereas he is by nature a Naked Animal; and only in certain circumstances, by purpose and device, masks himself in Clothes. Shakespeare says, we are creatures that look before and after: the more surprising that we do not look round a little, and see what is passing under our very eyes.
How, then, does it happen, the thoughtful mind might ask, that the grand Fabric of all Fabrics, the only true Fabric, has been completely ignored by Science—the cover Fabric, specifically, of wool or other cloth; which Man's Soul wears as its outer layer and overall; in which all his other Fabrics are contained and protected, where all his Abilities function, and where his entire Self exists, moves, and has its being? For if, from time to time, some wandering, broken-winged thinker has cast a glance into this obscure area, most have flown right over it, completely unaware; viewing Clothes as a possession, not a circumstance, as entirely natural and spontaneous, like the leaves on trees, like the feathers of birds. In all their theories, they have implicitly pictured man as a Clothed Animal; whereas he is, by nature, a Naked Animal; and only in certain situations, by intention and design, covers himself with Clothes. Shakespeare says we are creatures that look before and after: it’s all the more surprising that we do not take a moment to look around and see what is happening right under our noses.
But here, as in so many other cases, Germany, learned, indefatigable, deep-thinking Germany comes to our aid. It is, after all, a blessing that, in these revolutionary times, there should be one country where abstract Thought can still take shelter; that while the din and frenzy of Catholic Emancipations, and Rotten Boroughs, and Revolts of Paris, deafen every French and every English ear, the German can stand peaceful on his scientific watch-tower; and, to the raging, struggling multitude here and elsewhere, solemnly, from hour to 3hour, with preparatory blast of cowhorn, emit his Höret ihr Herren und lasset’s Euch sagen; in other words, tell the Universe, which so often forgets that fact, what o’clock it really is. Not unfrequently the Germans have been blamed for an unprofitable diligence; as if they struck into devious courses, where nothing was to be had but the toil of a rough journey; as if, forsaking the gold-mines of finance and that political slaughter of fat oxen whereby a man himself grows fat, they were apt to run goose-hunting into regions of bilberries and crowberries, and be swallowed up at last in remote peat-bogs. Of that unwise science, which, as our Humorist expresses it,—
But here, just like in so many other situations, Germany—knowledgeable, tireless, and deeply thoughtful—comes to our rescue. It's a blessing that, in these revolutionary times, there's one country where abstract thought can still find refuge. While the noise and chaos of Catholic Emancipation, corrupt electoral systems, and the revolts in Paris drown out every French and English voice, the German can calmly stand in his scientific watchtower. From hour to hour, with a preliminary blast of a cowhorn, he solemnly announces, Höret ihr Herren und lasset’s Euch sagen; in other words, he reminds the universe, which often forgets, what time it really is. The Germans have often been criticized for their relentless work ethic, as if they stray onto winding paths where nothing awaits but the effort of a tough journey. As if, abandoning the financial gold mines and the political plundering that makes one prosper, they were prone to chase after geese in areas full of blueberries and crowberries, eventually getting lost in far-off bogs. Of that unwise science, which, as our humorist puts it,—
‘By geometric scale
‘By geometric scaling’
Doth take the size of pots of ale;’
Doth take the size of pots of ale;’
still more, of that altogether misdirected industry, which is seen vigorously thrashing mere straw, there can nothing defensive be said. In so far as the Germans are chargeable with such, let them take the consequence. Nevertheless, be it remarked, that even a Russian steppe has tumuli and gold ornaments; also many a scene that looks desert and rock-bound from the distance, will unfold itself, when visited, into rare valleys. Nay, in any case, would Criticism erect not only finger-posts and turnpikes, but spiked gates and impassable barriers, for the mind of man? It is written, ‘Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.’ Surely the plain rule is, Let each considerate person have his way, and see what it will lead to. For not this man and that man, but all men make up mankind, and their united tasks the task of mankind. How often have we seen some such adventurous, and perhaps much-censured wanderer light on some out-lying, neglected, yet vitally-momentous province; the hidden treasures of which he first discovered, and kept proclaiming till the general eye and effort were directed thither, and the conquest was completed;—thereby, in these his seemingly so aimless rambles, planting new standards, founding new habitable colonies, in the immeasurable circumambient realm of Nothingness and Night! Wise man was he who counselled that Speculation should have free course, 4and look fearlessly towards all the thirty-two points of the compass, whithersoever and howsoever it listed.
still more, of that completely misdirected effort, which is seen energetically beating mere straw, nothing can be said in defense. As far as the Germans are responsible for this, they must face the consequences. However, it's worth noting that even a Russian steppe has burial mounds and gold ornaments; also, many a scene that appears barren and rocky from afar will reveal rare valleys when visited. Indeed, would Criticism not create not only signposts and toll booths but also spiked gates and impenetrable barriers for the human mind? It is written, ‘Many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall be increased.’ The simple rule is, let each thoughtful person go their own way and see where it leads. For it is not just this person or that person, but all people who make up humanity, and their collective efforts form the task of mankind. How often have we seen an adventurous, perhaps heavily criticized wanderer stumble upon some out-of-the-way, overlooked yet crucial region; the hidden treasures of which they first uncovered and kept proclaiming until the general attention and effort turned there, and the conquest was achieved;—thus, in these seemingly aimless wanderings, planting new standards, founding new livable colonies, in the vast surrounding realm of Nothingness and Night! Wise was the one who advised that Speculation should be free to roam, looking boldly toward all thirty-two points of the compass, wherever and however it pleased. 4
Perhaps it is proof of the stunted condition in which pure Science, especially pure moral Science, languishes among us English; and how our mercantile greatness, and invaluable Constitution, impressing a political or other immediately practical tendency on all English culture and endeavour, cramps the free flight of Thought,—that this, not Philosophy of Clothes, but recognition even that we have no such Philosophy, stands here for the first time published in our language. What English intellect could have chosen such a topic, or by chance stumbled on it? But for that same unshackled, and even sequestered condition of the German Learned, which permits and induces them to fish in all manner of waters, with all manner of nets, it seems probable enough, this abstruse Inquiry might, in spite of the results it leads to, have continued dormant for indefinite periods. The Editor of these sheets, though otherwise boasting himself a man of confirmed speculative habits, and perhaps discursive enough, is free to confess, that never, till these last months, did the above very plain considerations, on our total want of a Philosophy of Clothes, occur to him; and then, by quite foreign suggestion. By the arrival, namely, of a new Book from Professor Teufelsdröckh of Weissnichtwo; treating expressly of this subject, and in a style which, whether understood or not, could not even by the blindest be overlooked. In the present Editor’s way of thought, this remarkable Treatise, with its Doctrines, whether as judicially acceded to, or judicially denied, has not remained without effect.
Perhaps this shows how stunted pure Science, especially pure moral Science, is among us English; and how our mercantile strength and invaluable Constitution, which impose a political or immediately practical direction on all English culture and effort, restrict the free exploration of Thought. The fact that this, not Philosophy of Clothes, but simply the acknowledgment that we lack such a Philosophy, is being published in our language for the first time is telling. What English intellect could have chosen such a topic or happened upon it by chance? If it weren't for the unrestrained and somewhat isolated condition of German scholars, who are allowed and encouraged to explore a wide variety of subjects, it’s likely this complex Inquiry might have remained dormant for an indefinite time, despite the results it leads to. The Editor of these pages, although proud to call himself a man with a confirmed speculative mindset, and perhaps quite discursive, admits that he never considered the very straightforward thoughts on our complete lack of a Philosophy of Clothes until these last few months, prompted by an unrelated suggestion. This was sparked by the arrival of a new Book from Professor Teufelsdröckh of Weissnichtwo, specifically addressing this topic in a style that, whether understood or not, couldn’t be missed even by the most oblivious. In the present Editor’s perspective, this remarkable Treatise, with its doctrines, whether accepted or rejected, has certainly had an impact.
‘Die Kleider, ihr Werden und Wirken (Clothes, their Origin and Influence): von Diog. Teufelsdröckh, J.U.D. etc. Stillschweigen und Cognie. Weissnichtwo, 1831.
‘Die Kleider, ihr Werden und Wirken (Clothes, their Origin and Influence): by Diog. Teufelsdröckh, J.U.D. etc. Stillschweigen und Cognie. Weissnichtwo, 1831.
‘Here,’ says the Weissnichtwo’sche Anzeiger, ‘comes a Volume of that extensive, close-printed, close-meditated sort, which, be it spoken with pride, is seen only in Germany, perhaps only in Weissnichtwo. Issuing from the hitherto irreproachable Firm of Stillschweigen and Company, with every external furtherance, 5it is of such internal quality as to set Neglect at defiance.’ * * * * ‘A work,’ concludes the wellnigh enthusiastic Reviewer, ‘interesting alike to the antiquary, the historian, and the philosophic thinker; a masterpiece of boldness, lynx-eyed acuteness, and rugged independent Germanism and Philanthropy (derber Kerndeutschheit und Menschenliebe); which will not, assuredly, pass current without opposition in high places; but must and will exalt the almost new name of Teufelsdröckh to the first ranks of Philosophy, in our German Temple of Honour.’
‘Here,’ says the Weissnichtwo’sche Anzeiger, ‘comes a Volume of that extensive, closely printed, deeply considered kind, which, proudly speaking, is only found in Germany, perhaps only in Weissnichtwo. Published by the previously reputable Firm of Stillschweigen and Company, with every external support, 5 it has such internal quality as to defy Neglect.’ * * * * ‘A work,’ concludes the nearly enthusiastic Reviewer, ‘interesting to the collector, the historian, and the thoughtful philosopher; a masterpiece of boldness, sharp insight, and rugged independent German character and compassion (derber Kerndeutschheit und Menschenliebe); which will not, definitely, go unchallenged in high places; but must and will elevate the almost new name of Teufelsdröckh to the top ranks of Philosophy, in our German Temple of Honour.’
Mindful of old friendship, the distinguished Professor, in this the first blaze of his fame, which however does not dazzle him, sends hither a Presentation-copy of his Book; with compliments and encomiums which modesty forbids the present Editor to rehearse; yet without indicated wish or hope of any kind, except what may be implied in the concluding phrase: Möchte es (this remarkable Treatise) auch im Brittischen Boden gedeihen!
Mindful of old friendship, the esteemed Professor, in this early stage of his fame, which doesn’t overwhelm him, sends a Presentation copy of his Book; with compliments and praises that modesty prevents the current Editor from repeating; yet without any expressed wish or expectation, except what might be implied in the final phrase: Möchte es (this remarkable Treatise) auch im Brittischen Boden gedeihen!
CHAPTER II
CHAPTER 2
EDITORIAL DIFFICULTIES
If for a speculative man, ‘whose seedfield,’ in the sublime words of the Poet, ‘is Time,’ no conquest is important but that of new ideas, then might the arrival of Professor Teufelsdröckh’s Book be marked with chalk in the Editor’s calendar. It is indeed an ‘extensive Volume,’ of boundless, almost formless contents, a very Sea of Thought; neither calm nor clear, if you will; yet wherein the toughest pearl-diver may dive to his utmost depth, and return not only with sea-wreck but with true orients.
If for a speculative person, ‘whose field of ideas,’ in the elevated words of the Poet, ‘is Time,’ no achievement is significant except for new ideas, then the publication of Professor Teufelsdröckh’s Book should be marked with chalk in the Editor’s calendar. It is indeed an ‘extensive Volume,’ with limitless, almost formless content, a vast Sea of Thought; neither calm nor clear, if you wish; yet where even the toughest pearl-diver can dive to their utmost depth and return not only with sunken treasures but with genuine gems.
Directly on the first perusal, almost on the first deliberate inspection, it became apparent that here a quite new Branch of Philosophy, leading to as yet undescried ulterior results, was disclosed; farther, what seemed scarcely less interesting, a quite new human Individuality, 6an almost unexampled personal character, that, namely, of Professor Teufelsdröckh the Discloser. Of both which novelties, as far as might be possible, we resolved to master the significance. But as man is emphatically a proselytising creature, no sooner was such mastery even fairly attempted, than the new question arose: How might this acquired good be imparted to others, perhaps in equal need thereof: how could the Philosophy of Clothes, and the Author of such Philosophy, be brought home, in any measure, to the business and bosoms of our own English Nation? For if new-got gold is said to burn the pockets till it be cast forth into circulation, much more may new truth.
Right from the first look, almost immediately upon a closer examination, it became clear that a completely new branch of Philosophy, leading to previously undiscovered outcomes, was revealed. Even more intriguing was a completely new individual character, specifically that of Professor Teufelsdröckh the Discloser. We decided to grasp the significance of both these novelties as thoroughly as possible. But since people are naturally persuasive, as soon as we even attempted to master it, a new question arose: How could we share this newfound knowledge with others who might need it just as much? How could we convey the Philosophy of Clothes, and its Author, to the practical lives of our own English Nation? Because if new gold is said to burn in your pockets until it's spent, the same goes for new truth.
Here, however, difficulties occurred. The first thought naturally was to publish Article after Article on this remarkable Volume, in such widely-circulating Critical Journals as the Editor might stand connected with, or by money or love procure access to. But, on the other hand, was it not clear that such matter as must here be revealed, and treated of, might endanger the circulation of any Journal extant? If, indeed, all party-divisions in the State could have been abolished, Whig, Tory, and Radical, embracing in discrepant union; and all the Journals of the Nation could have been jumbled into one Journal, and the Philosophy of Clothes poured forth in incessant torrents therefrom, the attempt had seemed possible. But, alas, what vehicle of that sort have we, except Fraser’s Magazine? A vehicle all strewed (figuratively speaking) with the maddest Waterloo-Crackers, exploding distractively and destructively, wheresoever the mystified passenger stands or sits; nay, in any case, understood to be, of late years, a vehicle full to overflowing, and inexorably shut! Besides, to state the Philosophy of Clothes without the Philosopher, the ideas of Teufelsdröckh without something of his personality, was it not to insure both of entire misapprehension? Now for Biography, had it been otherwise admissible, there were no adequate documents, no hope of obtaining such, but rather, owing to circumstances, a special despair. Thus did the Editor see himself, for the while, shut out from all public utterance of these extraordinary Doctrines, and 7constrained to revolve them, not without disquietude, in the dark depths of his own mind.
Here, however, difficulties arose. The first thought was naturally to publish article after article about this remarkable volume in widely circulated critical journals that the editor could either connect with or gain access to through money or favors. But, on the other hand, wasn’t it clear that the content that needed to be revealed and discussed could jeopardize the circulation of any existing journal? If only all political divisions in the state—Whig, Tory, and Radical—could be abolished, coming together in a confused union; and if all the nation’s journals could be combined into one, pouring out the Philosophy of Clothes in endless streams, the attempt might have seemed feasible. But, sadly, what vehicle do we have for that, except Fraser’s Magazine? A vehicle metaphorically strewn with chaotic Waterloo firecrackers, exploding distractingly and destructively wherever the confused reader stands or sits; in any case, it has been understood in recent years to be a vehicle that is completely full and firmly shut! Besides, stating the Philosophy of Clothes without the Philosopher, the ideas of Teufelsdröckh without some insight into his personality, would ensure total misunderstanding. As for biography, had it even been otherwise possible, there were no sufficient documents, no hope of obtaining them, but rather, due to circumstances, a particular despair. Thus, the editor found himself, for a while, cut off from any public expression of these extraordinary doctrines and forced to ponder them, not without some unease, in the dark depths of his own mind.
So had it lasted for some months; and now the Volume on Clothes, read and again read, was in several points becoming lucid and lucent; the personality of its Author more and more surprising, but, in spite of all that memory and conjecture could do, more and more enigmatic; whereby the old disquietude seemed fast settling into fixed discontent,—when altogether unexpectedly arrives a Letter from Herr Hofrath Heuschrecke, our Professor’s chief friend and associate in Weissnichtwo, with whom we had not previously corresponded. The Hofrath, after much quite extraneous matter, began dilating largely on the ‘agitation and attention’ which the Philosophy of Clothes was exciting in its own German Republic of Letters; on the deep significance and tendency of his Friend’s Volume; and then, at length, with great circumlocution, hinted at the practicability of conveying ‘some knowledge of it, and of him, to England, and through England to the distant West’: a work on Professor Teufelsdröckh ‘were undoubtedly welcome to the Family, the National, or any other of those patriotic Libraries, at present the glory of British Literature’; might work revolutions in Thought; and so forth;—in conclusion, intimating not obscurely, that should the present Editor feel disposed to undertake a Biography of Teufelsdröckh, he, Hofrath Heuschrecke, had it in his power to furnish the requisite Documents.
It had been going on for several months, and now the book on Clothes, read repeatedly, was becoming clear on several points; the personality of its Author increasingly surprising, yet, despite all the memory and guessing, more and more mysterious. This led to the old unease turning into a fixed discontent—when unexpectedly, a letter arrived from Herr Hofrath Heuschrecke, our Professor’s main friend and colleague in Weissnichtwo, with whom we hadn’t corresponded before. After some irrelevant details, the Hofrath began to elaborate on the ‘excitement and attention’ the Philosophy of Clothes was generating in its own German Republic of Letters; on the deep significance and implications of his Friend’s book; and then, finally, with a lot of circumlocution, hinted at the possibility of sharing ‘some knowledge of it, and of him, with England, and through England to the distant West’: a work on Professor Teufelsdröckh ‘would undoubtedly be welcome to the Family, the National, or any of those patriotic Libraries, which are currently the pride of British Literature’; could potentially spark revolutions in Thought; and so on;—ultimately suggesting rather clearly that should the current Editor wish to take on a Biography of Teufelsdröckh, he, Hofrath Heuschrecke, could provide the necessary Documents.
As in some chemical mixture, that has stood long evaporating, but would not crystallise, instantly when the wire or other fixed substance is introduced, crystallisation commences, and rapidly proceeds till the whole is finished, so was it with the Editor’s mind and this offer of Heuschrecke’s. Form rose out of void solution and discontinuity; like united itself with like in definite arrangement: and soon either in actual vision and possession, or in fixed reasonable hope, the image of the whole Enterprise had shaped itself, so to speak, into a solid mass. Cautiously yet courageously, through the twopenny post, application to the famed redoubtable Oliver Yorke was now made: an interview, interviews 8with that singular man have taken place; with more of assurance on our side, with less of satire (at least of open satire) on his, than we anticipated;—for the rest, with such issue as is now visible. As to those same ‘patriotic Libraries,’ the Hofrath’s counsel could only be viewed with silent amazement; but with his offer of Documents we joyfully and almost instantaneously closed. Thus, too, in the sure expectation of these, we already see our task begun; and this our Sartor Resartus, which is properly a ‘Life and Opinions of Herr Teufelsdröckh,’ hourly advancing.
Like a chemical mixture that has been sitting around evaporating without crystallizing, the moment a wire or a solid object is added, crystallization begins and quickly completes. This is how the Editor’s mind reacted to Heuschrecke’s offer. A form emerged from a vague solution and disarray; similar ideas came together in a clear arrangement. Soon, whether through actual vision and possession or reasonable hope, the image of the entire project solidified into something tangible. Carefully yet boldly, the Editor sent an inquiry via the cheap post to the renowned and formidable Oliver Yorke: an interview, and interviews 8 with that unique individual took place; with more confidence on our side and less mockery (at least less open mockery) on his than we expected; and the outcome is now apparent. Regarding those so-called ‘patriotic Libraries,’ the Hofrath’s advice was met with silent astonishment; however, we gladly and almost immediately accepted his offer of documents. Thus, with the confident expectation of these, we can already see our work commencing; and our Sartor Resartus, which is essentially the ‘Life and Opinions of Herr Teufelsdröckh,’ is progressing by the hour.
Of our fitness for the Enterprise, to which we have such title and vocation, it were perhaps uninteresting to say more. Let the British reader study and enjoy, in simplicity of heart, what is here presented him, and with whatever metaphysical acumen and talent for meditation he is possessed of. Let him strive to keep a free, open sense; cleared from the mists of prejudice, above all from the paralysis of cant; and directed rather to the Book itself than to the Editor of the Book. Who or what such Editor may be, must remain conjectural, and even insignificant:** With us even he still communicates in some sort of mask, or muffler: and, we have reason to think, under a feigned name!—O. Y. it is a voice publishing tidings of the Philosophy of Clothes; undoubtedly a Spirit addressing Spirits: whoso hath ears, let him hear.
Of our suitability for the project, to which we have such a claim and purpose, it might be uninteresting to say more. Let the British reader study and enjoy, with an open heart, what is presented here, using whatever philosophical insight and ability to reflect he possesses. Let him try to maintain a free, open mind; free from the fog of prejudice and especially from the paralysis of empty phrases; and focus more on the content of the Book itself rather than on the Editor of the Book. Who or what this Editor is, must remain a matter of speculation, and even trivial: Understood. Please provide the text to modernize.Even with us, he still communicates in some kind of disguise or cover: and we have reason to believe he’s using a fake name!—O. Y. it is a voice sharing news about the Philosophy of Clothes; undoubtedly a Spirit addressing Spirits: let anyone with ears hear.
On one other point the Editor thinks it needful to give warning: namely, that he is animated with a true though perhaps a feeble attachment to the Institutions of our Ancestors; and minded to defend these, according to ability, at all hazards; nay, it was partly with a view to such defence that he engaged in this undertaking. To stem, or if that be impossible, profitably to divert the current of Innovation, such a Volume as Teufelsdröckh’s, if cunningly planted down, were no despicable pile, or floodgate, in the logical wear.
On one more point, the Editor feels it's important to give a heads-up: he has a genuine, though maybe a weak, affection for the traditions of our Ancestors and intends to defend them as best he can, no matter the cost. In fact, he partly took on this project with the goal of such defense in mind. To slow down, or if that’s not possible, to effectively redirect the tide of Innovation, a Volume like Teufelsdröckh’s, if placed thoughtfully, could serve as a valuable barrier or safeguard in the logical flow.
For the rest, be it nowise apprehended, that any personal connexion of ours with Teufelsdröckh, Heuschrecke, or this Philosophy of Clothes can pervert our 9judgment, or sway us to extenuate or exaggerate. Powerless, we venture to promise, are those private Compliments themselves. Grateful they may well be; as generous illusions of friendship; as fair mementos of bygone unions, of those nights and suppers of the gods, when, lapped in the symphonies and harmonies of Philosophic Eloquence, though with baser accompaniments, the present Editor revelled in that feast of reason, never since vouchsafed him in so full measure! But what then? Amicus Plato, magis amica veritas; Teufelsdröckh is our friend, Truth is our divinity. In our historical and critical capacity, we hope we are strangers to all the world; have feud or favour with no one,—save indeed the Devil, with whom, as with the Prince of Lies and Darkness, we do at all times wage internecine war. This assurance, at an epoch when puffery and quackery have reached a height unexampled in the annals of mankind, and even English Editors, like Chinese Shopkeepers, must write on their door-lintels No cheating here,—we thought it good to premise.
For the rest, let it not be assumed that any personal connection we have with Teufelsdröckh, Heuschrecke, or this Philosophy of Clothes can distort our judgment or lead us to downplay or exaggerate anything. We confidently promise that those personal compliments are powerless. They may be appreciated as kind gestures of friendship or as pleasant reminders of past connections, of those nights and feasts of the gods when the present Editor enjoyed that feast of reason, never since granted to him in such abundance! But what of it? Amicus Plato, magis amica veritas; Teufelsdröckh is our friend, Truth is our guiding principle. In our role as historians and critics, we hope to remain impartial; we have no disputes or favors with anyone—except perhaps the Devil, with whom, as with the Prince of Lies and Darkness, we are always engaged in a relentless battle. This assurance, at a time when superficiality and deception have reached unprecedented levels in human history, and even English Editors, like Chinese shopkeepers, must put up signs stating No cheating here, seemed worth mentioning.
CHAPTER III
Chapter 3
REMINISCENCES
To the Author’s private circle the appearance of this singular Work on Clothes must have occasioned little less surprise than it has to the rest of the world. For ourselves, at least, few things have been more unexpected. Professor Teufelsdröckh, at the period of our acquaintance with him, seemed to lead a quite still and self-contained life: a man devoted to the higher Philosophies, indeed; yet more likely, if he published at all, to publish a refutation of Hegel and Bardili, both of whom, strangely enough, he included under a common ban; than to descend, as he has here done, into the angry noisy Forum, with an Argument that cannot but exasperate and divide. Not, that we can remember, the Philosophy of Clothes once touched upon between 10us. If through the high, silent, meditative Transcendentalism of our Friend we detected any practical tendency whatever, it was at most Political, and towards a certain prospective, and for the present quite speculative, Radicalism; as indeed some correspondence, on his part, with Herr Oken of Jena was now and then suspected; though his special contribution to the Isis could never be more than surmised at. But, at all events, nothing Moral, still less anything Didactico-Religious, was looked for from him.
To the Author’s close friends, the release of this unique work on clothing probably caused just as much surprise as it did for everyone else. For us, at least, it was quite unexpected. Professor Teufelsdröckh, during our time getting to know him, appeared to lead a quiet and introspective life: he was a man dedicated to deep philosophical thought; yet he seemed more likely, if he were to publish anything, to write a critique of Hegel and Bardili—both of whom he unfairly grouped together—than to dive into the loud and contentious debate, presenting an argument sure to frustrate and divide people. As far as we can recall, the topic of the Philosophy of Clothes was never brought up between 10 us. If we ever sensed any practical inclination from our friend’s lofty, quiet, reflective transcendentalism, it was at most a political one, leaning toward a certain hopeful, yet currently purely theoretical, radicalism; indeed, some correspondence with Herr Oken from Jena was occasionally suspected on his part, though his specific contributions to the Isis could never be confirmed. However, we certainly didn’t expect anything moral, let alone anything didactic or religious, from him.
Well do we recollect the last words he spoke in our hearing; which indeed, with the Night they were uttered in, are to be forever remembered. Lifting his huge tumbler of Gukguk,** Gukguk is unhappily only an academical-beer. and for a moment lowering his tobacco-pipe, he stood up in full Coffee-house (it was Zur Grünen Gans, the largest in Weissnichtwo, where all the Virtuosity, and nearly all the Intellect of the place assembled of an evening); and there, with low, soul-stirring tone, and the look truly of an angel, though whether of a white or of a black one might be dubious, proposed this toast: Die Sache der Armen in Gottes und Teufels Namen (The Cause of the Poor, in Heaven’s name and ——’s)! One full shout, breaking the leaden silence; then a gurgle of innumerable emptying bumpers, again followed by universal cheering, returned him loud acclaim. It was the finale of the night: resuming their pipes; in the highest enthusiasm, amid volumes of tobacco-smoke; triumphant, cloud-capt without and within, the assembly broke up, each to his thoughtful pillow. Bleibt doch ein echter Spass- und Galgen-vogel, said several; meaning thereby that, one day, he would probably be hanged for his democratic sentiments. Wo steckt doch der Schalk? added they, looking round: but Teufelsdröckh had retired by private alleys, and the Compiler of these pages beheld him no more.
We clearly remember the last words he said while we were there; those words, along with that night, will always stick in our minds. Holding his big glass of Gukguk,I'm ready to assist you with modernizing text. Please provide the phrases you'd like me to work on.Gukguk is unfortunately just a scholarly beer. and briefly putting down his tobacco pipe, he stood up in the crowded coffee house (it was Zur Grünen Gans, the largest in Weissnichtwo, where all the talent and almost all the intellect of the place gathered in the evenings); and there, with a soft, stirring voice and a look that was truly angelic, although whether it was of a white or black angel might be questionable, he proposed this toast: Die Sache der Armen in Gottes und Teufels Namen (The Cause of the Poor, in Heaven’s name and ——’s)! A loud cheer broke the heavy silence; then came the sound of countless empty mugs being drained, followed by cheers erupting in appreciation for him. It was the grand finale of the night: as they resumed their pipes, filled with excitement, surrounded by clouds of tobacco smoke, the group broke up, each heading off to their reflective pillow. Bleibt doch ein echter Spass- und Galgen-vogel, several remarked, implying that one day he would likely be hanged for his democratic views. Wo steckt doch der Schalk? they added, looking around: but Teufelsdröckh had slipped away through back streets, and the writer of these pages never saw him again.
In such scenes has it been our lot to live with this Philosopher, such estimate to form of his purposes and powers. And yet, thou brave Teufelsdröckh, who could tell what lurked in thee? Under those thick locks of thine, so long and lank, overlapping roof-wise the 11gravest face we ever in this world saw, there dwelt a most busy brain. In thy eyes too, deep under their shaggy brows, and looking out so still and dreamy, have we not noticed gleams of an ethereal or else a diabolic fire, and half-fancied that their stillness was but the rest of infinite motion, the sleep of a spinning-top? Thy little figure, there as, in loose, ill-brushed threadbare habiliments, thou sattest, amid litter and lumber, whole days, to ‘think and smoke tobacco,’ held in it a mighty heart. The secrets of man’s Life were laid open to thee; thou sawest into the mystery of the Universe, farther than another; thou hadst in petto thy remarkable Volume on Clothes. Nay, was there not in that clear logically-founded Transcendentalism of thine; still more, in thy meek, silent, deep-seated Sansculottism, combined with a true princely Courtesy of inward nature, the visible rudiments of such speculation? But great men are too often unknown, or what is worse, misknown. Already, when we dreamed not of it, the warp of thy remarkable Volume lay on the loom; and silently, mysterious shuttles were putting in the woof!
In these moments, we've lived alongside this Philosopher, trying to understand his intentions and abilities. And yet, you brave Teufelsdröckh, who could really know what was hidden within you? Beneath that long, unkempt hair of yours, covering the most serious face we’ve ever seen, there was a busy mind at work. In your eyes, deep under those unruly brows, with their calm and dreamy gaze, didn’t we catch glimpses of either a divine or a demonic fire, and half-suspected that their stillness was just the pause of endless motion, like the sleep of a spinning top? Your small figure, sitting there in your loose, poorly-kept, worn-out clothes, surrounded by clutter for whole days just to 'think and smoke tobacco,' contained a mighty heart. The secrets of human life were laid bare to you; you saw deeper into the mystery of the Universe than anyone else; you had inside you your remarkable book on Clothes. And wasn't there, in that clear logical Transcendentalism of yours, and even more so in your humble, quiet, deeply-rooted Sansculottism, combined with a genuine princely courtesy of spirit, the visible beginnings of such deep thought? But great individuals often remain unknown, or worse, misunderstood. Even when we were unaware, the foundation of your remarkable book was already being woven; and silently, mysterious shuttles were weaving the threads!
How the Hofrath Heuschrecke is to furnish biographical data, in this case, may be a curious question; the answer of which, however, is happily not our concern, but his. To us it appeared, after repeated trial, that in Weissnichtwo, from the archives or memories of the best-informed classes, no Biography of Teufelsdröckh was to be gathered; not so much as a false one. He was a stranger there, wafted thither by what is called the course of circumstances; concerning whose parentage, birthplace, prospects, or pursuits, curiosity had indeed made inquiries, but satisfied herself with the most indistinct replies. For himself, he was a man so still and altogether unparticipating, that to question him even afar off on such particulars was a thing of more than usual delicacy: besides, in his sly way, he had ever some quaint turn, not without its satirical edge, wherewith to divert such intrusions, and deter you from the like. Wits spoke of him secretly as if he were a kind of Melchizedek, without father or mother 12of any kind; sometimes, with reference to his great historic and statistic knowledge, and the vivid way he had of expressing himself like an eye-witness of distant transactions and scenes, they called him the Ewige Jude, Everlasting, or as we say, Wandering Jew.
How Hofrath Heuschrecke is supposed to provide biographical information in this case might be an intriguing question; however, thankfully, it's not our concern but his. After several attempts, it became clear to us that in Weissnichtwo, from the archives or the memories of the most knowledgeable classes, no biography of Teufelsdröckh could be found—not even a made-up one. He was a stranger there, brought in by what is often called the course of events; curiosity had indeed made inquiries about his parents, birthplace, future, or pursuits but was left with only vague answers. For his part, he was so quiet and completely uninterested that asking him about such details, even indirectly, required unusual sensitivity. Besides, in his sly manner, he always had some quirky response, not lacking a satirical edge, to deflect such questions and discourage you from asking again. Those in the know referred to him secretly as a sort of Melchizedek, without any father or mother of any kind; at times, regarding his extensive historical and statistical knowledge and the vivid way he expressed himself as if he were a firsthand witness to distant events and scenes, they referred to him as the Ewige Jude, Everlasting, or as we say, Wandering Jew.
To the most, indeed, he had become not so much a Man as a Thing; which Thing doubtless they were accustomed to see, and with satisfaction; but no more thought of accounting for than for the fabrication of their daily Allgemeine Zeitung, or the domestic habits of the Sun. Both were there and welcome; the world enjoyed what good was in them, and thought no more of the matter. The man Teufelsdröckh passed and repassed, in his little circle, as one of those originals and nondescripts, more frequent in German Universities than elsewhere; of whom, though you see them alive, and feel certain enough that they must have a History, no History seems to be discoverable; or only such as men give of mountain rocks and antediluvian ruins: That they may have been created by unknown agencies, are in a state of gradual decay, and for the present reflect light and resist pressure; that is, are visible and tangible objects in this phantasm world, where so much other mystery is.
To most people, he had become less a man and more a thing; a thing they were likely used to seeing and accepted, but they thought no more about it than they did about the daily Allgemeine Zeitung or the everyday habits of the Sun. Both were present and welcomed; the world appreciated what was good in them and thought nothing more of it. Teufelsdröckh moved around in his little circle as one of those oddballs or eccentrics more common at German universities than anywhere else; of whom, even if you see them alive and feel certain they have a history, no real history seems to be found. It’s like how people talk about mountain rocks and ancient ruins: they may have been created by unknown forces, are gradually falling apart, and right now, they reflect light and resist pressure; meaning they are visible and tangible objects in this world full of mysteries, where so much else remains unknown.
It was to be remarked that though, by title and diploma, Professor der Allerley-Wissenschaft, or as we should say in English, ‘Professor of Things in General,’ he had never delivered any Course; perhaps never been incited thereto by any public furtherance or requisition. To all appearance, the enlightened Government of Weissnichtwo, in founding their New University, imagined they had done enough, if ‘in times like ours,’ as the half-official Program expressed it, ‘when all things are, rapidly or slowly, resolving themselves into Chaos, a Professorship of this kind had been established; whereby, as occasion called, the task of bodying somewhat forth again from such Chaos might be, even slightly, facilitated.’ That actual Lectures should be held, and Public Classes for the ‘Science of Things in General,’ they doubtless considered premature; on which ground too they had only established the Professorship, nowise endowed it; so that Teufelsdröckh, 13‘recommended by the highest Names,’ had been promoted thereby to a Name merely.
It should be noted that although he held the title and diploma of Professor der Allerley-Wissenschaft, or as we would say in English, ‘Professor of Things in General,’ he had never actually taught any courses; in fact, he may never have been encouraged to do so by any public initiative or demand. From all appearances, the enlightened government of Weissnichtwo, in establishing their New University, believed they had done enough, if ‘in times like ours,’ as the semi-official program put it, ‘when everything is, rapidly or slowly, falling into chaos, this kind of professorship had been created; thereby, as needed, the task of bringing some order back from such chaos might be, even slightly, easier.’ They likely considered it too soon for actual lectures to be held, and for public classes on the ‘Science of Things in General,’ which is why they only created the professorship without providing any funding; as a result, Teufelsdröckh, 13‘endorsed by the most prestigious names,’ had merely been elevated to a name in title only.
Great, among the more enlightened classes, was the admiration of this new Professorship: how an enlightened Government had seen into the Want of the Age (Zeitbedürfniss); how at length, instead of Denial and Destruction, we were to have a science of Affirmation and Reconstruction; and Germany and Weissnichtwo were where they should be, in the vanguard of the world. Considerable also was the wonder at the new Professor, dropt opportunely enough into the nascent University; so able to lecture, should occasion call; so ready to hold his peace for indefinite periods, should an enlightened Government consider that occasion did not call. But such admiration and such wonder, being followed by no act to keep them living, could last only nine days; and, long before our visit to that scene, had quite died away. The more cunning heads thought it was all an expiring clutch at popularity, on the part of a Minister, whom domestic embarrassments, court intrigues, old age, and dropsy soon afterwards finally drove from the helm.
Among the more enlightened classes, there was great admiration for this new Professorship: how an enlightened Government recognized the needs of the times; how, instead of denial and destruction, we were to embrace a science of affirmation and reconstruction; and how Germany and some other places were leading the way in the world. There was also considerable curiosity about the new Professor, who serendipitously appeared at the newly established University; he was able to lecture when needed and ready to stay silent for indefinite periods if an enlightened Government decided that the moment wasn’t right. However, this admiration and wonder, without any actions to sustain them, could only last nine days; by the time we visited that place, they had completely faded. The more cunning minds believed it was all a last-ditch effort for popularity by a Minister whose domestic troubles, court intrigues, old age, and health issues soon afterwards forced him out of power.
As for Teufelsdröckh, except by his nightly appearances at the Grüne Gans, Weissnichtwo saw little of him, felt little of him. Here, over his tumbler of Gukguk, he sat reading Journals; sometimes contemplatively looking into the clouds of his tobacco-pipe, without other visible employment: always, from his mild ways, an agreeable phenomenon there; more especially when he opened his lips for speech; on which occasions the whole Coffee-house would hush itself into silence, as if sure to hear something noteworthy. Nay, perhaps to hear a whole series and river of the most memorable utterances; such as, when once thawed, he would for hours indulge in, with fit audience: and the more memorable, as issuing from a head apparently not more interested in them, not more conscious of them, than is the sculptured stone head of some public fountain, which through its brass mouth-tube emits water to the worthy and the unworthy; careless whether it be for cooking victuals or quenching conflagrations; 14indeed, maintains the same earnest assiduous look, whether any water be flowing or not.
As for Teufelsdröckh, aside from his evening visits to the Grüne Gans, Weissnichtwo didn’t see much of him or feel his presence. There, with his glass of Gukguk, he sat reading journals; sometimes lost in thought as he gazed into the smoke of his tobacco pipe, with no other visible activity. His gentle demeanor made him a pleasant sight, especially when he spoke; during those times, the entire coffee house would fall silent, eager to catch something significant. In fact, they might hear a long stream of memorable thoughts, as he could easily go on for hours when he found the right audience. His words were particularly noteworthy, coming from someone who seemed as indifferent to them as the sculpted stone head of a public fountain, which pours water from its brass spout for both the deserving and the undeserving, whether it's for cooking food or putting out fires; it still maintains the same serious, diligent expression, regardless of whether water flows or not. 14
To the Editor of these sheets, as to a young enthusiastic Englishman, however unworthy, Teufelsdröckh opened himself perhaps more than to the most. Pity only that we could not then half guess his importance, and scrutinise him with due power of vision! We enjoyed, what not three men in Weissnichtwo could boast of, a certain degree of access to the Professor’s private domicile. It was the attic floor of the highest house in the Wahngasse; and might truly be called the pinnacle of Weissnichtwo, for it rose sheer up above the contiguous roofs, themselves rising from elevated ground. Moreover, with its windows it looked towards all the four Orte, or as the Scotch say, and we ought to say, Airts: the sitting-room itself commanded three; another came to view in the Schlafgemach (bedroom) at the opposite end; to say nothing of the kitchen, which offered two, as it were, duplicates, and showing nothing new. So that it was in fact the speculum or watch-tower of Teufelsdröckh; wherefrom, sitting at ease, he might see the whole life-circulation of that considerable City; the streets and lanes of which, with all their doing and driving (Thun und Treiben), were for the most part visible there.
To the Editor of these pages, as to a young, eager Englishman, Teufelsdröckh opened up more than he did to most people. It’s a shame we couldn’t fully grasp his significance back then and observe him with proper insight! We enjoyed, what not three people in Weissnichtwo could claim, a certain level of access to the Professor’s private living space. It was on the attic floor of the tallest building on Wahngasse, and it could truly be called the peak of Weissnichtwo, as it rose high above the neighboring roofs, which were themselves on elevated ground. Additionally, with its windows, it faced all four Orte, or as the Scots say, and we should say, Airts: the sitting room alone overlooked three; another was visible from the Schlafgemach (bedroom) at the opposite end; not to mention the kitchen, which offered two, effectively, duplicates, showing nothing new. Thus, it was essentially the observation point of Teufelsdröckh; from there, sitting comfortably, he could watch the entire life-sparkle of that significant City; the streets and alleys of which, with all their activities and hustle (Thun und Treiben), were mostly visible from that vantage point.
“I look down into all that wasp-nest or bee-hive,” have we heard him say, “and witness their wax-laying and honey-making, and poison-brewing, and choking by sulphur. From the Palace esplanade, where music plays while Serene Highness is pleased to eat his victuals, down to the low lane, where in her door-sill the aged widow, knitting for a thin livelihood, sits to feel the afternoon sun, I see it all; for, except the Schlosskirche weathercock, no biped stands so high. Couriers arrive bestrapped and bebooted, bearing Joy and Sorrow bagged-up in pouches of leather: there, top-laden, and with four swift horses, rolls-in the country Baron and his household; here, on timber-leg, the lamed Soldier hops painfully along, begging alms: a thousand carriages, and wains, and cars, come tumbling-in with Food, with young Rusticity, and other Raw Produce, inanimate or animate, and go tumbling 15out again with Produce manufactured. That living flood, pouring through these streets, of all qualities and ages, knowest thou whence it is coming, whither it is going? Aus der Ewigkeit, zu der Ewigkeit hin: From Eternity, onwards to Eternity! These are Apparitions: what else? Are they not Souls rendered visible: in Bodies, that took shape and will lose it, melting into air? Their solid Pavement is a picture of the Sense; they walk on the bosom of Nothing, blank Time is behind them and before them. Or fanciest thou, the red and yellow Clothes-screen yonder, with spurs on its heels and feather in its crown, is but of Today, without a Yesterday or a Tomorrow; and had not rather its Ancestor alive when Hengst and Horsa overran thy Island? Friend, thou seest here a living link in that Tissue of History, which inweaves all Being: watch well, or it will be past thee, and seen no more.”
“I look down at all that buzzing and bustling,” he says, “and see how they produce their wax and honey, and brew their poison, and suffocate with sulfur. From the Palace esplanade, where music plays while the Serene Highness enjoys his meals, down to the narrow street where the elderly widow sits on her doorstep, knitting to make ends meet and soaking in the afternoon sun, I see everything; for except for the weather vane on the Schlosskirche, no one stands as high as I do. Couriers arrive, fully equipped and booted, bringing bags of Joy and Sorrow: there comes the country Baron with his household, all loaded up and pulled by four swift horses; here, the lamed Soldier hobbles painfully along on his wooden leg, begging for change: a thousand carriages, wagons, and carts come rolling in with food, fresh produce, and other raw materials, living or not, and roll back out again with manufactured goods. That living flood, streaming through these streets in all its diversity and ages, do you know where it's coming from or where it’s going? Aus der Ewigkeit, zu der Ewigkeit hin: From Eternity, onward to Eternity! These are apparitions: what else could they be? Aren't they souls made visible, in bodies that took shape and will lose it, dissolving into air? Their solid pavement reflects reality; they walk on the surface of nothingness, with blank time behind them and ahead of them. Or do you think that colorful clothes over there, with spurs on its heels and a feather in its crown, is just of today, without a yesterday or a tomorrow; and didn’t it have an ancestor alive when Hengst and Horsa invaded your island? Friend, you see here a living link in that fabric of history, which weaves together all existence: watch closely, or it will pass you by and be gone forever.”
“Ach, mein Lieber!” said he once, at midnight, when we had returned from the Coffee-house in rather earnest talk, “it is a true sublimity to dwell here. These fringes of lamplight, struggling up through smoke and thousandfold exhalation, some fathoms into the ancient reign of Night, what thinks Boötes of them, as he leads his Hunting-Dogs over the Zenith in their leash of sidereal fire? That stifled hum of Midnight, when Traffic has lain down to rest; and the chariot-wheels of Vanity, still rolling here and there through distant streets, are bearing her to Halls roofed-in, and lighted to the due pitch for her; and only Vice and Misery, to prowl or to moan like nightbirds, are abroad: that hum, I say, like the stertorous, unquiet slumber of sick Life, is heard in Heaven! Oh, under that hideous covelet of vapours, and putrefactions, and unimaginable gases, what a Fermenting-vat lies simmering and hid! The joyful and the sorrowful are there; men are dying there, men are being born; men are praying,—on the other side of a brick partition, men are cursing; and around them all is the vast, void Night. The proud Grandee still lingers in his perfumed saloons, or reposes within damask curtains; Wretchedness cowers into truckle-beds, or shivers hunger-stricken into 16its lair of straw: in obscure cellars, Rouge-et-Noir languidly emits its voice-of-destiny to haggard hungry Villains; while Councillors of State sit plotting, and playing their high chess-game, whereof the pawns are Men. The Lover whispers his mistress that the coach is ready; and she, full of hope and fear, glides down, to fly with him over the borders: the Thief, still more silently, sets-to his picklocks and crowbars, or lurks in wait till the watchmen first snore in their boxes. Gay mansions, with supper-rooms and dancing-rooms, are full of light and music and high-swelling hearts; but, in the Condemned Cells, the pulse of life beats tremulous and faint, and bloodshot eyes look-out through the darkness, which is around and within, for the light of a stern last morning. Six men are to be hanged on the morrow: comes no hammering from the Rabenstein?—their gallows must even now be o’ building. Upwards of five-hundred-thousand two-legged animals without feathers lie round us, in horizontal positions; their heads all in nightcaps, and full of the foolishest dreams. Riot cries aloud, and staggers and swaggers in his rank dens of shame; and the Mother, with streaming hair, kneels over her pallid dying infant, whose cracked lips only her tears now moisten.—All these heaped and huddled together, with nothing but a little carpentry and masonry between them;—crammed in, like salted fish in their barrel;—or weltering, shall I say, like an Egyptian pitcher of tamed vipers, each struggling to get its head above the others: such work goes on under that smoke-counterpane!—But I, mein Werther, sit above it all; I am alone with the Stars.”
“Oh, my dear!” he said once at midnight, after we had returned from the coffeehouse, deep in conversation, “it truly is sublime to be here. These rays of lamplight, fighting their way through smoke and countless exhalations, reaching into the ancient reign of Night, what does Boötes think of them as he leads his Hunting-Dogs across the sky with their leashes of starlight? That muffled hum of Midnight, when traffic has settled down to rest; while the wheels of Vanity still roll here and there through distant streets, carrying her to homes that are enclosed and lit just right for her; and only Vice and Misery roam or moan like night creatures: that hum, I say, like the heavy, restless sleep of sick Life, is heard in Heaven! Oh, beneath that horrible cover of vapors, decay, and unimaginable gases, what a pot is simmering and hidden! The joyful and the sorrowful are there; people are dying there, people are being born; people are praying—on the other side of a brick wall, people are cursing; and all around them is the vast, empty Night. The proud noble still lingers in his scented salons or relaxes behind damask curtains; Wretchedness huddles in small beds or shivers, starved, in its straw lair: in dark cellars, Rouge-et-Noir lazily whispers its voice of fate to haggard, hungry Villains; while Councillors of State plot and play their high-stakes chess game, where the pawns are Men. The Lover whispers to his mistress that the coach is ready; and she, filled with hope and fear, glides down to flee with him over the borders: the Thief, even more quietly, prepares his picklocks and crowbars or waits in the shadows until the watchmen first snore in their boxes. Bright homes, full of dining rooms and dance floors, overflow with light and music and joyful hearts; but in the Condemned Cells, the pulse of life beats weakly and faintly, and bloodshot eyes look out through the surrounding darkness, searching for the light of a harsh last morning. Six men are to be hanged tomorrow: is there no hammering from the Rabenstein?—their gallows must be under construction now. Over five hundred thousand two-legged animals without feathers lie around us, horizontal; their heads all in nightcaps, full of the silliest dreams. Riot cries out and staggers and sways in his filthy dens of shame; and the Mother, with streaming hair, kneels over her pale, dying infant, whose cracked lips are now only moistened by her tears.—All these piled together, with nothing but a bit of carpentry and masonry between them;—stuffed in like salted fish in a barrel;—or writhing, shall I say, like an Egyptian pitcher of tamed vipers, each trying to get its head above the others: such work goes on under that smoke-cover!—But I, mein Werther, sit above it all; I am alone with the Stars.”
We looked in his face to see whether, in the utterance of such extraordinary Night-thoughts, no feeling might be traced there; but with the light we had, which indeed was only a single tallow-light, and far enough from the window, nothing save that old calmness and fixedness was visible.
We looked at his face to see if there was any emotion revealed in his remarkable night thoughts, but with the dim light we had—a single candle far from the window—only that familiar calmness and stillness were visible.
These were the Professor’s talking seasons: most commonly he spoke in mere monosyllables, or sat altogether silent, and smoked; while the visitor had liberty either to say what he listed, receiving for answer an occasional grunt; or to look round for a space, and 17then take himself away. It was a strange apartment; full of books and tattered papers, and miscellaneous shreds of all conceivable substances, ‘united in a common element of dust.’ Books lay on tables, and below tables; here fluttered a sheet of manuscript, there a torn handkerchief, or nightcap hastily thrown aside; ink-bottles alternated with bread-crusts, coffee-pots, tobacco-boxes, Periodical Literature, and Blücher Boots. Old Lieschen (Lisekin, ’Liza), who was his bed-maker and stove-lighter, his washer and wringer, cook, errand-maid, and general lion’s-provider, and for the rest a very orderly creature, had no sovereign authority in this last citadel of Teufelsdröckh; only some once in the month she half-forcibly made her may thither, with broom and duster, and (Teufelsdröckh hastily saving his manuscripts) effected a partial clearance, a jail-delivery of such lumber as was not literary. These were her Erdbeben (earthquakes), which Teufelsdröckh dreaded worse than the pestilence; nevertheless, to such length he had been forced to comply. Glad would he have been to sit here philosophising forever, or till the litter, by accumulation, drove him out of doors: but Lieschen was his right-arm, and spoon, and necessary of life, and would not be flatly gainsayed. We can still remember the ancient woman; so silent that some thought her dumb; deaf also you would often have supposed her; for Teufelsdröckh, and Teufelsdröckh only, would she serve or give heed to; and with him she seemed to communicate chiefly by signs; if it were not rather by some secret divination that she guessed all his wants, and supplied them. Assiduous old dame! she scoured, and sorted, and swept, in her kitchen, with the least possible violence to the ear; yet all was tight and right there: hot and black came the coffee ever at the due moment; and the speechless Lieschen herself looked out on you, from under her clean white coif with its lappets, through her clean withered face and wrinkles, with a look of helpful intelligence, almost of benevolence.
These were the Professor’s speaking times: most of the time he communicated in just a few words or sat in silence, smoking; while the visitor had the freedom to talk as much as they wanted, receiving only an occasional grunt in return, or to look for a spot and then leave. It was a strange room; filled with books and crumpled papers, and random bits of all sorts, ‘united in a common element of dust.’ Books were scattered on tables and beneath them; a sheet of manuscript fluttered here, a torn handkerchief or a nightcap tossed aside there; ink bottles were mixed in with bread crusts, coffee pots, tobacco boxes, magazines, and boots. Old Lieschen (Lisekin, ’Liza), who was his bedmaker, stove lighter, washer and wringer, cook, errand-runner, and general caretaker, and generally a very organized person, had no real power in this last stronghold of Teufelsdröckh; only once a month would she somewhat force her way in, broom and duster in hand, and (Teufelsdröckh quickly saving his manuscripts) do a partial cleanup, a release of non-literary clutter. These were her Erdbeben (earthquakes), which Teufelsdröckh feared more than disease; still, he had been compelled to go along with it. He would have been happy to sit there philosophizing forever, or until the mess became so overwhelming that it pushed him outside: but Lieschen was his lifeline, his right hand, and his basic need, and she wouldn’t take no for an answer. We can still remember the old woman; so quiet that some thought she might be mute; at times you’d think she was deaf too; because she would only serve or pay attention to Teufelsdröckh; and with him, she seemed to communicate mainly through gestures; unless it was more of some secret intuition that allowed her to anticipate all his needs and meet them. Diligent old woman! she cleaned, organized, and swept in her kitchen with minimal noise; yet everything was neat and in order there: the coffee arrived hot and dark right on schedule; and the silent Lieschen herself looked out at you from beneath her clean white coif with its flaps, through her clean, lined face and wrinkles, with a look of helpful understanding, almost kindness.
Few strangers, as above hinted, had admittance hither: the only one we ever saw there, ourselves excepted, was the Hofrath Heuschrecke, already known, 18by name and expectation, to the readers of these pages. To us, at that period, Herr Heuschrecke seemed one of those purse-mouthed, crane-necked, clean-brushed, pacific individuals, perhaps sufficiently distinguished in society by this fact, that, in dry weather or in wet, ‘they never appear without their umbrella.’ Had we not known with what ‘little wisdom’ the world is governed; and how, in Germany as elsewhere, the ninety-and-nine Public Men can for most part be but mute train-bearers to the hundredth, perhaps but stalking-horses and willing or unwilling dupes,—it might have seemed wonderful how Herr Heuschrecke should be named a Rath, or Councillor, and Counsellor, even in Weissnichtwo. What counsel to any man, or to any woman, could this particular Hofrath give; in whose loose, zigzag figure; in whose thin visage, as it went jerking to and fro, in minute incessant fluctuation,—you traced rather confusion worse confounded; at most, Timidity and physical Cold? Some indeed said withal, he was ‘the very Spirit of Love embodied’: blue earnest eyes, full of sadness and kindness; purse ever open, and so forth; the whole of which, we shall now hope, for many reasons, was not quite groundless. Nevertheless friend Teufelsdröckh’s outline, who indeed handled the burin like few in these cases, was probably the best: Er hat Gemüth und Geist, hat wenigstens gehabt, doch ohne Organ, ohne Schicksals-Gunst; ist gegenwärtig aber halb-zerrüttet, halb-erstarrt, “He has heart and talent, at least has had such, yet without fit mode of utterance, or favour of Fortune; and so is now half-cracked, half-congealed.”—What the Hofrath shall think of this when he sees it, readers may wonder: we, safe in the stronghold of Historical Fidelity, are careless.
Few strangers, as previously mentioned, were allowed in here: the only one we ever saw, besides ourselves, was Hofrath Heuschrecke, already known by name and reputation to the readers of these pages. To us, at that time, Herr Heuschrecke seemed like one of those tight-lipped, long-necked, well-groomed, calm individuals, perhaps somewhat distinguished in society by the fact that, in dry weather or rain, “they never appear without their umbrella.” If we didn’t know how little wisdom governs the world; and how, in Germany as elsewhere, the ninety-nine Public Men are mostly just silent attendants to the hundredth, perhaps mere pawns and willing or unwilling dupes—it might have seemed astonishing how Herr Heuschrecke was called a Rath, or Councillor, even in Weissnichtwo. What advice could this particular Hofrath offer any man or any woman? In his loose, zigzag figure; in his thin face, which jerked back and forth in constant, subtle motion—you perceived only confusion and perhaps a mix of Timidity and physical Cold? Some even claimed he was “the very Spirit of Love embodied”: with earnest blue eyes, full of sadness and kindness; always generous with his money, and so on; which, we hope, for many reasons, wasn’t entirely unfounded. Nevertheless, friend Teufelsdröckh’s description, who truly handled the pen better than most in such cases, was probably the best: *Er hat Gemüth und Geist, hat wenigstens gehabt, doch ohne Organ, ohne Schicksals-Gunst; ist gegenwärtig aber halb-zerrüttet, halb-erstarrt*, “He has heart and talent, at least he used to, yet without a proper way to express himself or the favor of Fortune; and so is now half-crazy, half-frozen.” What the Hofrath will think of this when he sees it, readers may wonder: we, safe in the fortress of Historical Fidelity, are indifferent.
The main point, doubtless, for us all, is his love of Teufelsdröckh, which indeed was also by far the most decisive feature of Heuschrecke himself. We are enabled to assert that he hung on the Professor with the fondness of a Boswell for his Johnson. And perhaps with the like return; for Teufelsdröckh treated his gaunt admirer with little outward regard, as some half-rational or altogether irrational friend, and at best loved him out of gratitude and by habit. On the other hand, it was 19curious to observe with what reverent kindness, and a sort of fatherly protection, our Hofrath, being the elder, richer, and as he fondly imagined far more practically influential of the two, looked and tended on his little Sage, whom he seemed to consider as a living oracle. Let but Teufelsdröckh open his mouth, Heuschrecke’s also unpuckered itself into a free doorway, besides his being all eye and all ear, so that nothing might be lost: and then, at every pause in the harangue, he gurgled-out his pursy chuckle of a cough-laugh (for the machinery of laughter took some time to get in motion, and seemed crank and slack), or else his twanging nasal, Bravo! Das glaub’ ich; in either case, by way of heartiest approval. In short, if Teufelsdröckh was Dalai-Lama, of which, except perhaps in his self-seclusion, and god-like indifference, there was no symptom, then might Heuschrecke pass for his chief Talapoin, to whom no dough-pill he could knead and publish was other than medicinal and sacred.
The main point, without a doubt, for all of us, is his love for Teufelsdröckh, which was also the most defining characteristic of Heuschrecke himself. We can confidently say that he admired the Professor with the same dedication as Boswell had for Johnson. And perhaps the feeling was mutual; Teufelsdröckh treated his lanky admirer with little outward concern, as if he were a half-rational or completely irrational friend, and at best loved him out of gratitude and habit. On the other hand, it was 19interesting to see how reverently and kindly our Hofrath, being older, wealthier, and, as he fondly believed, far more practically influential, cared for his little Sage, whom he seemed to view as a living oracle. Whenever Teufelsdröckh spoke, Heuschrecke's face would also light up, along with him being all eyes and ears, making sure nothing was missed. Then, at every pause in the lecture, he would let out his wheezy laugh and cough (as if the mechanics of laughter took some time to get going and seemed a bit rusty), or he would chime in with a nasal, Bravo! Das glaub’ ich; in either case, showing his full approval. In short, if Teufelsdröckh were the Dalai Lama, which, aside from his self-isolation and god-like indifference, showed no signs, then Heuschrecke could very well be considered his chief supporter, to whom no dough-pill he could create and share was anything but medicinal and sacred.
In such environment, social, domestic, physical, did Teufelsdröckh, at the time of our acquaintance, and most likely does he still, live and meditate. Here, perched-up in his high Wahngasse watch-tower, and often, in solitude, outwatching the Bear, it was that the indomitable Inquirer fought all his battles with Dulness and Darkness; here, in all probability, that he wrote this surprising Volume on Clothes. Additional particulars: of his age, which was of that standing middle sort you could only guess at; of his wide surtout; the colour of his trousers, fashion of his broad-brimmed steeple-hat, and so forth, we might report, but do not. The Wisest truly is, in these times, the Greatest; so that an enlightened curiosity, leaving Kings and suchlike to rest very much on their own basis, turns more and more to the Philosophic Class: nevertheless, what reader expects that, with all our writing and reporting, Teufelsdröckh could be brought home to him, till once the Documents arrive? His Life, Fortunes, and Bodily Presence, are as yet hidden from us, or matter only of faint conjecture. But, on the other hand, does not his Soul lie enclosed in this remarkable Volume, much more truly than Pedro Garcia’s did in the buried Bag 20of Doubloons? To the soul of Diogenes Teufelsdröckh, to his opinions, namely, on the ‘Origin and Influence of Clothes,’ we for the present gladly return.
In this environment, socially, domestically, and physically, Teufelsdröckh, at the time we met, and most likely still does, live and reflect. Here, perched in his high Wahngasse watchtower, often alone, keeping an eye on the Bear, the unstoppable Inquirer fought all his battles against Boredom and Ignorance; here, he probably wrote this surprising book on Clothes. We could report additional details about his age, which was of that vague middle kind you could only guess at; about his long coat; the color of his pants, the style of his wide-brimmed hat, and so on, but we won’t. The wisest truly is the greatest in these times; so as enlightened curiosity increasingly moves away from Kings and their kind, it turns more and more to the Philosophical Class: nevertheless, what reader expects that, with all our writing and reporting, Teufelsdröckh could be fully understood until the documents arrive? His life, fortunes, and physical presence are still hidden from us, or only a matter of faint speculation. But, on the other hand, doesn't his soul reside within this remarkable volume, even more so than Pedro Garcia’s did in the buried bag of Doubloons? To the soul of Diogenes Teufelsdröckh, to his views, particularly on the ‘Origin and Influence of Clothes,’ we now happily return.
CHAPTER IV
CHAPTER 4
CHARACTERISTICS
It were a piece of vain flattery to pretend that this Work on Clothes entirely contents us; that it is not, like all works of genius, like the very Sun, which, though the highest published creation, or work of genius, has nevertheless black spots and troubled nebulosities amid its effulgence,—a mixture of insight, inspiration, with dulness, double-vision, and even utter blindness.
It would be sheer flattery to pretend that this Work on Clothes fully satisfies us; that it isn't, like all great works, like the Sun itself, which, despite being the most brilliant published creation, still has dark spots and chaotic areas in the midst of its brightness—a blend of insight, inspiration, with dullness, misperception, and even complete blindness.
Without committing ourselves to those enthusiastic praises and prophesyings of the Weissnichtwo’sche Anzeiger, we admitted that the Book had in a high degree excited us to self-activity, which is the best effect of any book; that it had even operated changes in our way of thought; nay, that it promised to prove, as it were, the opening of a new mine-shaft, wherein the whole world of Speculation might henceforth dig to unknown depths. More especially it may now be declared that Professor Teufelsdröckh’s acquirements, patience of research, philosophic and even poetic vigour, are here made indisputably manifest; and unhappily no less his prolixity and tortuosity and manifold ineptitude; that, on the whole, as in opening new mine-shafts is not unreasonable, there is much rubbish in his Book, though likewise specimens of almost invaluable ore. A paramount popularity in England we cannot promise him. Apart from the choice of such a topic as Clothes, too often the manner of treating it betokens in the Author a rusticity and academic seclusion, unblamable, indeed inevitable in a German, but fatal to his success with our public.
Without fully embracing the enthusiastic praise and predictions of the Weissnichtwo’sche Anzeiger, we acknowledged that the Book had significantly inspired us to take initiative, which is the best response any book can provide; that it had even changed our way of thinking; and that it seemed to promise the opening of a new mine-shaft, where the entire world of Speculation could henceforth explore unknown depths. More specifically, it can now be stated that Professor Teufelsdröckh’s knowledge, thorough research, philosophical and even poetic energy are clearly evident; and unfortunately, so are his verbosity, complexity, and various shortcomings; overall, while opening new mine-shafts isn't unreasonable, there's a lot of junk in his Book, though there are also pieces of nearly priceless material. We can't guarantee him significant popularity in England. Besides the choice of a topic like Clothes, the way he addresses it often shows a rural and academic isolation, which is excusable and, in fact, inevitable for a German, but detrimental to his success with our audience.
Of good society Teufelsdröckh appears to have seen 21little, or has mostly forgotten what he saw. He speaks-out with a strange plainness; calls many things by their mere dictionary names. To him the Upholsterer is no Pontiff, neither is any Drawing-room a Temple, were it never so begilt and overhung: ‘a whole immensity of Brussels carpets, and pier-glasses, and or-molu,’ as he himself expresses it, ‘cannot hide from me that such Drawing-room is simply a section of Infinite Space, where so many God-created Souls do for the time meet together.’ To Teufelsdröckh the highest Duchess is respectable, is venerable; but nowise for her pearl bracelets and Malines laces: in his eyes, the star of a Lord is little less and little more than the broad button of Birmingham spelter in a Clown’s smock; ‘each is an implement,’ he says, ‘in its kind; a tag for hooking-together; and, for the rest, was dug from the earth, and hammered on a smithy before smith’s fingers.’ Thus does the Professor look in men’s faces with a strange impartiality, a strange scientific freedom; like a man unversed in the higher circles, like a man dropped thither from the Moon. Rightly considered, it is in this peculiarity, running through his whole system of thought, that all these short-comings, over-shootings, and multiform perversities, take rise: if indeed they have not a second source, also natural enough, in his Transcendental Philosophies, and humour of looking at all Matter and Material things as Spirit; whereby truly his case were but the more hopeless, the more lamentable.
Teufelsdröckh seems to have experienced little of good society or has mostly forgotten what he did see. He speaks with a strange simplicity, calling many things by their basic dictionary definitions. To him, the Upholsterer is not a Pontiff, and no Drawing-room is a Temple, no matter how lavishly decorated it is: "a whole huge amount of Brussels carpets, pier-glasses, and ormolu," as he puts it, "cannot hide from me that such a Drawing-room is simply a section of Infinite Space where many God-created Souls happen to meet for a time." To Teufelsdröckh, the highest Duchess is respectable and venerable, but not because of her pearl bracelets and Malines lace; in his eyes, the star of a Lord is no more and no less than the broad button of Birmingham spelter on a Clown’s smock; "each is a tool," he says, "in its own right; a tag for hooking-together; and, after all, was dug from the earth and hammered in a blacksmith's shop before the blacksmith's hands." Thus, the Professor gazes into people’s faces with a strange impartiality and a scientific freedom, like someone unfamiliar with high society, as if he has been dropped there from the Moon. When you really think about it, this peculiarity that runs through his entire way of thinking is where all these shortcomings, missteps, and various distortions come from; unless, of course, they also have a natural second source in his Transcendental Philosophies and his tendency to view all Matter and Material things as Spirit; in which case, his situation becomes even more hopeless and lamentable.
To the Thinkers of this nation, however, of which class it is firmly believed there are individuals yet extant, we can safely recommend the Work: nay, who knows but among the fashionable ranks too, if it be true, as Teufelsdröckh maintains, that ‘within the most starched cravat there passes a windpipe and weasand, and under the thickliest embroidered waistcoat beats a heart,’—the force of that rapt earnestness may be felt, and here and there an arrow of the soul pierce through? In our wild Seer, shaggy, unkempt, like a Baptist living on locusts and wild honey, there is an untutored energy, a silent, as it were unconscious, strength, which, except in the higher walks of 22Literature, must be rare. Many a deep glance, and often with unspeakable precision, has he cast into mysterious Nature, and the still more mysterious Life of Man. Wonderful it is with what cutting words, now and then, he severs asunder the confusion; shears down, were it furlongs deep, into the true centre of the matter; and there not only hits the nail on the head, but with crushing force smites it home, and buries it.—On the other hand, let us be free to admit, he is the most unequal writer breathing. Often after some such feat, he will play truant for long pages, and go dawdling and dreaming, and mumbling and maundering the merest commonplaces, as if he were asleep with eyes open, which indeed he is.
To the thinkers of this nation, however, we strongly believe there are still individuals among them, and we can confidently recommend this work. Who knows, perhaps even within fashionable circles, if it’s true, as Teufelsdröckh claims, that “beneath the most starched cravat there’s a windpipe and esophagus, and under the thickest embroidered waistcoat there’s a heart”—the intensity of that earnestness might be felt, and now and then, an arrow of the soul could break through? In our wild Seer, shaggy and unkempt, like a Baptist living on locusts and wild honey, there is a raw energy, a silent, almost unconscious strength that, except in the highest levels of Literature, is quite rare. He has cast many deep glances, often with extraordinary precision, into the mysterious Nature and the even more mysterious Life of Man. It’s amazing how, with sharp words, he sometimes cuts through the confusion; he dives deep, even if it’s furlongs down, into the true essence of the matter, not only hitting the nail on the head but hitting it hard and driving it home. On the flip side, we must admit he’s the most inconsistent writer alive. Often, after achieving such a feat, he will wander off for long passages, dawdling and dreaming, mumbling and rambling about the most basic ideas, as if he were asleep with his eyes open, which, in fact, he is.
Of his boundless Learning, and how all reading and literature in most known tongues, from Sanchoniathon to Dr Lingard, from your Oriental Shasters, and Talmuds, and Korans, with Cassini’s Siamese Tables, and Laplace’s Mécanique Céleste, down to Robinson Crusoe and the Belfast Town and Country Almanack, are familiar to him,—we shall say nothing: for unexampled as it is with us, to the Germans such universality of study passes without wonder, as a thing commendable, indeed, but natural, indispensable, and there of course. A man that devotes his life to learning, shall he not be learned?
Of his vast knowledge, and how he is familiar with reading and literature in most known languages, from Sanchoniathon to Dr. Lingard, from your Eastern Shasters, and Talmuds, and Korans, to Cassini’s Siamese Tables, and Laplace’s Mécanique Céleste, down to Robinson Crusoe and the Belfast Town and Country Almanack, we won’t say much: for while it seems extraordinary to us, to the Germans such a wide-ranging study is seen as unremarkable, something commendable but natural, necessary, and expected. If a man dedicates his life to learning, shouldn’t he be knowledgeable?
In respect of style our Author manifests the same genial capability, marred too often by the same rudeness, inequality, and apparent want of intercourse with the higher classes. Occasionally, as above hinted, we find consummate vigour, a true inspiration; his burning thoughts step forth in fit burning words, like so many full-formed Minervas, issuing amid flame and splendour from Jove’s head; a rich, idiomatic diction, picturesque allusions, fiery poetic emphasis, or quaint tricksy turns; all the graces and terrors of a wild Imagination, wedded to the clearest Intellect, alternate in beautiful vicissitude. Were it not that sheer sleeping and soporific passages; circumlocutions, repetitions, touches even of pure doting jargon, so often intervene! On the whole, Professor Teufelsdröckh is not a cultivated writer. Of his sentences perhaps not more than 23nine-tenths stand straight on their legs; the remainder are in quite angular attitudes, buttressed-up by props (of parentheses and dashes), and ever with this or the other tagrag hanging from them; a few even sprawl-out helplessly on all sides, quite broken-backed and dismembered. Nevertheless, in almost his very worst moods, there lies in him a singular attraction. A wild tone pervades the whole utterance of the man, like its keynote and regulator; now screwing itself aloft as into the Song of Spirits, or else the shrill mockery of Fiends; now sinking in cadences, not without melodious heartiness, though sometimes abrupt enough, into the common pitch, when we hear it only as a monotonous hum; of which hum the true character is extremely difficult to fix. Up to this hour we have never fully satisfied ourselves whether it is a tone and hum of real Humour, which we reckon among the very highest qualities of genius, or some echo of mere Insanity and Inanity, which doubtless ranks below the very lowest.
In terms of style, our author shows the same warm ability, but it's often spoiled by rudeness, inconsistency, and a clear disconnection from the upper classes. Sometimes, as mentioned earlier, we encounter remarkable energy and genuine inspiration; his passionate ideas emerge in powerful words, like fully formed Minervas coming out in flames and brilliance from Jupiter's head; he uses a rich, colorful language, vivid references, passionate poetic emphasis, and quirky twists; all the beauty and fear of a wild imagination mix with a clear intellect, alternating in a lovely dance. If only there weren't so many dull and sleep-inducing passages; roundabout expressions, repetitions, and even moments of pure nonsense that frequently interrupt! Overall, Professor Teufelsdröckh is not a refined writer. Of his sentences, maybe only 23 nine-tenths stand firm; the rest are awkwardly constructed, propped up with parentheses and dashes, often adorned with all sorts of odd bits hanging off them; some even flop around helplessly, completely broken and disjointed. Yet, even in his worst attempts, there's a unique appeal to him. A wild tone runs through everything he says, acting as its underlying theme; sometimes it raises itself into an elevated realm like the Song of Spirits, or becomes the sharp mockery of Fiends; at other times, it sinks into cadences that can still be melodically hearty, though often abrupt, settling into a monotonous buzz that’s hard to define. To this day, we’ve never truly figured out whether this is a tone and buzz of genuine humor, which we consider one of the highest qualities of genius, or just an echo of pure insanity and foolishness, which definitely falls below the lowest point.
Under a like difficulty, in spite even of our personal intercourse, do we still lie with regard to the Professor’s moral feeling. Gleams of an ethereal Love burst forth from him, soft wailings of infinite pity; he could clasp the whole Universe into his bosom, and keep it warm; it seems as if under that rude exterior there dwelt a very seraph. Then again he is so sly and still, so imperturbably saturnine; shows such indifference, malign coolness towards all that men strive after; and ever with some half-visible wrinkle of a bitter sardonic humour, if indeed it be not mere stolid callousness,—that you look on him almost with a shudder, as on some incarnate Mephistopheles, to whom this great terrestrial and celestial Round, after all, were but some huge foolish Whirligig, where kings and beggars, and angels and demons, and stars and street-sweepings, were chaotically whirled, in which only children could take interest. His look, as we mentioned, is probably the gravest ever seen: yet it is not of that cast-iron gravity frequent enough among our own Chancery suitors; but rather the gravity as of some silent, high-encircled mountain-pool, perhaps the crater of an extinct volcano; into whose black deeps you fear to gaze: those 24eyes, those lights that sparkle in it, may indeed be reflexes of the heavenly Stars, but perhaps also glances from the region of Nether Fire!
Under a similar difficulty, despite our personal interactions, we still misjudge the Professor’s moral compass. Moments of an ethereal Love radiate from him, soft cries of endless compassion; he could embrace the entire Universe and keep it warm; it feels like there's a true angel beneath that tough exterior. Yet, he is also so cunning and reserved, so unshakeably gloomy; he shows such indifference, a cold malice towards everything people strive for; and always with some barely visible trace of bitter sarcasm, if not sheer indifference—that you look at him almost with a shudder, like some embodiment of Mephistopheles, for whom this vast earthly and celestial cycle is merely a huge absurd Whirligig, where kings and beggars, angels and demons, stars and street-sweepings are chaotically tossed around, something only children could care about. His expression, as we mentioned, is probably the most serious ever seen: yet it's not the hard, unyielding gravity often found among our own Chancery litigants; but rather a gravity like that of a silent, high-mountain pool, perhaps the crater of an extinct volcano; into whose dark depths you fear to look: those 24eyes, those lights that sparkle in it, may indeed be reflections of the heavenly Stars, but they could also be glimmers from the realm of Nether Fire!
Certainly a most involved, self-secluded, altogether enigmatic nature, this of Teufelsdröckh! Here, however, we gladly recall to mind that once we saw him laugh; once only, perhaps it was the first and last time in his life; but then such a peal of laughter, enough to have awakened the Seven Sleepers! It was of Jean Paul’s doing: some single billow in that vast World-Mahlstrom of Humour, with its heaven-kissing coruscations, which is now, alas, all congealed in the frost of death! The large-bodied Poet and the small, both large enough in soul, sat talking miscellaneously together, the present Editor being privileged to listen; and now Paul, in his serious way, was giving one of those inimitable ‘Extra-harangues’; and, as it chanced, On the Proposal for a Cast-metal King: gradually a light kindled in our Professor’s eyes and face, a beaming, mantling, loveliest light; through those murky features, a radiant, ever-young Apollo looked; and he burst forth like the neighing of all Tattersall’s,—tears streaming down his cheeks, pipe held aloft, foot clutched into the air,—loud, long-continuing, uncontrollable; a laugh not of the face and diaphragm only, but of the whole man from head to heel. The present Editor, who laughed indeed, yet with measure, began to fear all was not right: however, Teufelsdröckh composed himself, and sank into his old stillness; on his inscrutable countenance there was, if anything, a slight look of shame; and Richter himself could not rouse him again. Readers who have any tincture of Psychology know how much is to be inferred from this; and that no man who has once heartily and wholly laughed can be altogether irreclaimably bad. How much lies in Laughter: the cipher-key, wherewith we decipher the whole man! Some men wear an everlasting barren simper; in the smile of others lies a cold glitter as of ice: the fewest are able to laugh, what can be called laughing, but only sniff and titter and snigger from the throat outwards; or at best, produce some whiffling husky cachinnation, 25as if they were laughing through wool: of none such comes good. The man who cannot laugh is not only fit for treasons, stratagems, and spoils; but his whole life is already a treason and a stratagem.
Certainly a very complex, self-isolated, completely mysterious person, this Teufelsdröckh! Here, however, we gladly remember that we once saw him laugh; just once, maybe it was the first and last time in his life; but it was such a loud, joyful laugh that it could have woken the Seven Sleepers! It was thanks to Jean Paul: a single wave in that huge World-Mahlstrom of Humor, with its sky-high sparkles, which is now, unfortunately, all frozen in the grip of death! The big-bodied Poet and the small one, both large in spirit, were chatting casually together, with the current Editor getting the chance to listen; and now Paul, in his serious manner, was delivering one of those unique ‘Extra-harangues’; and, as luck would have it, on the topic of a Cast-metal King: slowly, a light ignited in our Professor’s eyes and face, a radiant, lovely glow; through those dark features, a shining, forever-young Apollo appeared; and he burst forth like the neighing of all of Tattersall’s—tears streaming down his cheeks, pipe held high, foot in the air—loud, long-lasting, uncontrollable; a laugh not just from the face and diaphragm, but from the whole person from head to toe. The current Editor, who did laugh as well but in moderation, started to worry that something was off: nevertheless, Teufelsdröckh pulled himself together and returned to his usual stillness; on his inscrutable face, there was, if anything, a hint of shame; and even Richter couldn’t get him to laugh again. Readers with any understanding of Psychology know how much can be inferred from this; that no person who has truly and fully laughed can be completely irredeemably bad. There’s so much in Laughter: it’s the cipher-key with which we decode the whole person! Some men wear an everlasting empty grin; in the smile of others, there's a cold shine like ice: the fewest can really laugh, as in genuine laughter, while the rest only sniffle and snicker or at best, produce some weak, raspy chuckle, 25as if laughing through wool: no good comes from such people. The person who cannot laugh is not only fit for betrayals, schemes, and plundering; but their whole life is already a betrayal and a scheme.
Considered as an Author, Herr Teufelsdröckh has one scarcely pardonable fault, doubtless his worst: an almost total want of arrangement. In this remarkable Volume, it is true, his adherence to the mere course of Time produces, through the Narrative portions, a certain show of outward method; but of true logical method and sequence there is too little. Apart from its multifarious sections and subdivisions, the Work naturally falls into two Parts; a Historical-Descriptive, and a Philosophical-Speculative: but falls, unhappily, by no firm line of demarcation; in that labyrinthic combination, each Part overlaps, and indents, and indeed runs quite through the other. Many sections are of a debatable rubric or even quite nondescript and unnameable; whereby the Book not only loses in accessibility, but too often distresses us like some mad banquet, wherein all courses had been confounded, and fish and flesh, soup and solid, oyster-sauce, lettuces, Rhine-wine and French mustard, were hurled into one huge tureen or trough, and the hungry Public invited to help itself. To bring what order we can out of this Chaos shall be part of our endeavour.
Considered as an Author, Herr Teufelsdröckh has one nearly unforgivable fault, probably his worst: a nearly complete lack of organization. In this remarkable book, it’s true that his adherence to the simple passage of Time creates a certain appearance of outward order through the Narrative parts; however, there is very little true logical method or sequence. Aside from its various sections and subdivisions, the work naturally divides into two parts: a Historical-Descriptive and a Philosophical-Speculative. Unfortunately, these parts do not have a clear line of separation; in this convoluted combination, each part overlaps and intertwines, and indeed runs completely through the other. Many sections are of questionable classification or even entirely nondescript and unnameable, which not only makes the book less accessible but often distresses us like some crazy banquet where all the courses have been mixed together, and fish and meat, soup and solid dishes, oyster sauce, lettuce, Rhine wine, and French mustard were thrown into one massive trough, inviting the hungry public to help themselves. Bringing some order out of this chaos will be part of our effort.
CHAPTER V
CHAPTER 5
THE WORLD IN CLOTHES
‘As Montesquieu wrote a Spirit of Laws,’ observes our Professor, ‘so could I write a Spirit of Clothes; thus, with an Esprit des Lois, properly an Esprit de Coutumes, we should have an Esprit de Costumes. For neither in tailoring nor in legislating does man proceed by mere Accident, but the hand is ever guided on by mysterious operations of the mind. In all his Modes, and habilatory endeavours, an Architectural 26Idea will be found lurking; his Body and the Cloth are the site and materials whereon and whereby his beautified edifice, of a Person, is to be built. Whether he flow gracefully out in folded mantles, based on light sandals; tower-up in high headgear, from amid peaks, spangles and bell-girdles; swell-out in starched ruffs, buckram stuffings, and monstrous tuberosities; or girth himself into separate sections, and front the world an Agglomeration of four limbs,—will depend on the nature of such Architectural Idea: whether Grecian, Gothic, Later-Gothic, or altogether Modern, and Parisian or Anglo-Dandiacal. Again, what meaning lies in Colour! From the soberest drab to the high-flaming scarlet, spiritual idiosyncrasies unfold themselves in choice of Colour: if the Cut betoken Intellect and Talent, so does the Colour betoken Temper and Heart. In all which, among nations as among individuals, there is an incessant, indubitable, though infinitely complex working of Cause and Effect: every snip of the Scissors has been regulated and prescribed by ever-active Influences, which doubtless to Intelligences of a superior order are neither invisible nor illegible.
‘As Montesquieu wrote a Spirit of Laws,’ our Professor points out, ‘I could just as easily write a Spirit of Clothes; therefore, with a Esprit des Lois, we should have an Esprit de Coutumes and an Esprit de Costumes. In both tailoring and lawmaking, nothing happens by mere chance; our hands are always guided by the intricate workings of our minds. In all his styles and clothing efforts, there’s always an Architectural 26 Idea lurking. The body and the fabric are the site and materials used to create the beautified structure of a person. Whether he flows elegantly in draped garments over light sandals, stands tall in elaborate headgear, adorned with peaks, sparkles, and bells; puffs out in starched collars, stiff materials, and exaggerated shapes; or wraps himself into distinct sections, presenting a complex figure of limbs—this all depends on the nature of that Architectural Idea: whether it's Grecian, Gothic, Later-Gothic, or entirely Modern, Parisian, or Anglo-Dandy. And then there's the significance of Color! Ranging from the most muted drab to vibrant scarlet, personal philosophies reveal themselves in color choices: if the Cut signifies Intellect and Talent, the Color reflects Temper and Heart. In all this, whether among nations or individuals, there’s a constant and undeniable, though incredibly complex, interplay of Cause and Effect: every snip of the Scissors is shaped and influenced by ever-present forces, which surely are neither invisible nor unreadable to higher intelligences.’
‘For such superior Intelligences a Cause-and-Effect Philosophy of Clothes, as of Laws, were probably a comfortable winter-evening entertainment: nevertheless, for inferior Intelligences, like men, such Philosophies have always seemed to me uninstructive enough. Nay, what is your Montesquieu himself but a clever infant spelling Letters from a hieroglyphical prophetic Book, the lexicon of which lies in Eternity, in Heaven?—Let any Cause-and-Effect Philosopher explain, not why I wear such and such a Garment, obey such and such a Law; but even why I am here, to wear and obey anything!—Much, therefore, if not the whole, of that same Spirit of Clothes I shall suppress, as hypothetical, ineffectual, and even impertinent: naked Facts, and Deductions drawn therefrom in quite another than that omniscient style, are my humbler and proper province.’
‘For such superior Intelligences, a Cause-and-Effect Philosophy of Clothes, just like Laws, might be a nice way to spend a winter evening. However, for lower Intelligences, like humans, such Philosophies have always seemed pretty unhelpful to me. Indeed, what is your Montesquieu but a clever child decoding letters from a symbolic, prophetic book, the dictionary of which exists in Eternity, in Heaven?—Let any Cause-and-Effect Philosopher explain not just why I wear this or that garment or follow this or that law, but even why I am here to wear and obey anything!—So, much of that same Spirit of Clothes I will disregard as hypothetical, ineffective, and even rude: straightforward Facts and the Conclusions that come from them, in a much different style than that all-knowing approach, are my more humble and appropriate focus.’
Acting on which prudent restriction, Teufelsdröckh has nevertheless contrived to take-in a well-nigh 27boundless extent of field; at least, the boundaries too often lie quite beyond our horizon. Selection being indispensable, we shall here glance-over his First Part only in the most cursory manner. This First Part is, no doubt, distinguished by omnivorous learning, and utmost patience and fairness: at the same time, in its results and delineations, it is much more likely to interest the Compilers of some Library of General, Entertaining, Useful, or even Useless Knowledge than the miscellaneous readers of these pages. Was it this Part of the Book which Heuschrecke had in view, when he recommended us to that joint-stock vehicle of publication, ‘at present the glory of British Literature’? If so, the Library Editors are welcome to dig in it for their own behoof.
Acting on that wise restriction, Teufelsdröckh has still managed to cover almost an endless field; at least, the boundaries often stretch far beyond our sight. Since selection is necessary, we will only glance at his First Part in the briefest way possible. This First Part is undoubtedly marked by wide-ranging knowledge and considerable patience and fairness; however, in its findings and descriptions, it is much more likely to catch the interest of the Compilers of some Library of General, Entertaining, Useful, or even Useless Knowledge than the casual readers of these pages. Was it this part of the Book that Heuschrecke had in mind when he recommended us to that joint-stock publishing venture, "currently the pride of British Literature"? If so, the Library Editors are welcome to sift through it for their own benefit.
To the First Chapter, which turns on Paradise and Fig-leaves, and leads us into interminable disquisitions of a mythological, metaphorical, cabalistico-sartorial and quite antediluvian cast, we shall content ourselves with giving an unconcerned approval. Still less have we to do with ‘Lilis, Adam’s first wife, whom, according to the Talmudists, he had before Eve, and who bore him, in that wedlock, the whole progeny of aerial, aquatic, and terrestrial Devils,’—very needlessly, we think. On this portion of the Work, with its profound glances into the Adam-Kadmon, or Primeval Element, here strangely brought into relation with the Nifl and Muspel (Darkness and Light) of the antique North, it may be enough to say, that its correctness of deduction, and depth of Talmudic and Rabbinical lore have filled perhaps not the worst Hebraist in Britain with something like astonishment.
To the First Chapter, which revolves around Paradise and fig leaves, and takes us into endless discussions that are mythological, metaphorical, cabalistic, sartorial, and quite ancient, we’ll just offer a casual thumbs-up. We’re even less concerned with ‘Lilis, Adam's first wife, whom the Talmudists say he had before Eve, and who bore him, in that union, the entire lineage of aerial, aquatic, and terrestrial devils,’—which seems unnecessary to us. Regarding this section of the Work, with its deep insights into the Adam-Kadmon, or Primeval Element, oddly connected to the Nifl and Muspel (Darkness and Light) of the ancient North, it’s enough to say that its accuracy in reasoning and depth of Talmudic and Rabbinical knowledge has possibly left even the best Hebraist in Britain somewhat astonished.
But, quitting this twilight region, Teufelsdröckh hastens from the Tower of Babel, to follow the dispersion of Mankind over the whole habitable and habilable globe. Walking by the light of Oriental, Pelasgic, Scandinavian, Egyptian, Otaheitean, Ancient and Modern researches of every conceivable kind, he strives to give us in compressed shape (as the Nürnbergers give an Orbis Pictus) an Orbis Vestitus; or view of the costumes of all mankind, in all countries, in all times. It is here that to the Antiquarian, to the Historian, we 28can triumphantly say: Fall to! Here is learning: an irregular Treasury, if you will; but inexhaustible as the Hoard of King Nibelung, which twelve wagons in twelve days, at the rate of three journeys a day, could not carry off. Sheepskin cloaks and wampum belts; phylacteries, stoles, albs; chlamydes, togas, Chinese silks, Afghaun shawls, trunk-hose, leather breeches, Celtic philibegs (though breeches, as the name Gallia Braccata indicates, are the more ancient), Hussar cloaks, Vandyke tippets, ruffs, fardingales, are brought vividly before us,—even the Kilmarnock nightcap is not forgotten. For most part, too, we must admit that the Learning, heterogeneous as it is, and tumbled-down quite pell-mell, is true concentrated and purified Learning, the drossy parts smelted out and thrown aside.
But leaving this ambiguous area behind, Teufelsdröckh hurries from the Tower of Babel to track the spread of humanity across the entire habitable globe. Guided by the insights of Eastern, Pelasgian, Scandinavian, Egyptian, Tahitian, ancient, and modern research of every kind, he aims to present us with a condensed version (like the Nürnberger’s Orbis Pictus) of an Orbis Vestitus; a comprehensive view of the clothing styles of all people, in all places, at all times. It is here that we can confidently say to the antiquarian and the historian: Dive in! Here’s knowledge: an eclectic treasury if you like; but as endless as the hoard of King Nibelung, which twelve carts in twelve days, making three trips each day, couldn't cart away. Sheepskin cloaks and wampum belts; amulets, stoles, albs; chlamydes, togas, Chinese silks, Afghan shawls, trunk-hose, leather pants, Celtic kilts (though trousers, as the term Gallia Braccata suggests, are older), Hussar cloaks, Vandyke tippets, ruffs, farthingales are vividly presented to us—even the Kilmarnock nightcap is not overlooked. For the most part, we have to acknowledge that this knowledge, as varied as it is, thrown together in a haphazard manner, is truly concentrated and refined knowledge, with the drossy elements smelted out and discarded.
Philosophical reflections intervene, and sometimes touching pictures of human life. Of this sort the following has surprised us. The first purpose of Clothes, as our Professor imagines, was not warmth or decency, but ornament. ‘Miserable indeed,’ says he, ‘was the condition of the Aboriginal Savage, glaring fiercely from under his fleece of hair, which with the beard reached down to his loins, and hung round him like a matted cloak; the rest of his body sheeted in its thick natural fell. He loitered in the sunny glades of the forest, living on wild-fruits; or, as the ancient Caledonian, squatted himself in morasses, lurking for his bestial or human prey; without implements, without arms, save the ball of heavy Flint, to which, that his sole possession and defence might not be lost, he had attached a long cord of plaited thongs; thereby recovering as well as hurling it with deadly unerring skill. Nevertheless, the pains of Hunger and Revenge once satisfied, his next care was not Comfort but Decoration (Putz). Warmth he found in the toils of the chase; or amid dried leaves, in his hollow tree, in his bark shed, or natural grotto: but for Decoration he must have Clothes. Nay, among wild people we find tattooing and painting even prior to Clothes. The first spiritual want of a barbarous man is Decoration, as 29indeed we still see among the barbarous classes in civilised countries.
Philosophical thoughts come into play, sometimes presenting vivid images of human life. One such reflection has caught our attention. According to our Professor, the primary purpose of clothes wasn’t warmth or modesty, but decoration. “Truly miserable,” he states, “was the situation of the Aboriginal Savage, glaring fiercely from beneath his thick hair, which along with his beard reached down to his waist and draped around him like a tangled cloak; his body covered in its dense natural fur. He lounged in the sunny clearings of the forest, living off wild fruits; or, like the ancient Caledonian, squatted in marshes, waiting for his animal or human prey; without tools, without weapons, except for a heavy flint ball, to which he had attached a long cord made of braided strips, ensuring that his only possession and means of defense wouldn’t be lost, allowing him to recover it as well as throw it with deadly precision. Still, once the pains of hunger and revenge were satisfied, his next concern was not comfort but decoration (Putz). He found warmth through hunting, or in dried leaves, in his hollow tree, in his bark shelter, or in a natural cave; but for decoration, he needed clothes. Indeed, among primitive people, we see tattooing and body painting even before the use of clothes. The first spiritual need of a primitive person is decoration, as we still observe among the less civilized groups in modern societies.
‘Reader, the heaven-inspired melodious Singer; loftiest Serene Highness; nay thy own amber-locked, snow-and-rose-bloom Maiden, worthy to glide sylphlike almost on air, whom thou lovest, worshippest as a divine Presence, which, indeed, symbolically taken, she is,—has descended, like thyself, from that same hair-mantled, flint-hurling Aboriginal Anthropophagus! Out of the eater cometh forth meat; out of the strong cometh forth sweetness. What changes are wrought, not by time, yet in Time! For not Mankind only, but all that Mankind does or beholds, is in continual growth, regenesis and self-perfecting vitality. Cast forth thy Act, thy Word, into the ever-living, ever-working Universe: it is a seed-grain that cannot die; unnoticed to-day (says one), it will be found flourishing as a Banyan-grove (perhaps, alas, as a Hemlock-forest!) after a thousand years.
‘Reader, the heaven-inspired melodious Singer; loftiest Serene Highness; nay your own amber-haired, snow-and-rose-bloom Maiden, worthy to glide gracefully almost on air, whom you love, worship as a divine Presence, which, indeed, symbolically, she is,—has descended, like you, from that same hair-covered, rock-throwing Primitive Ancestral Human! Out of the eater comes forth food; out of the strong comes forth sweetness. What changes happen, not just by time, but in Time! For not only Humanity, but all that Humanity does or sees, is in constant growth, renewal, and self-perfecting vitality. Throw forth your Action, your Word, into the ever-living, ever-working Universe: it is a seed that cannot die; unnoticed today (one says), it will be found thriving as a Banyan grove (perhaps, alas, as a Hemlock forest!) after a thousand years.
‘He who first shortened the labour of Copyists by device of Movable Types was disbanding hired Armies, and cashiering most Kings and Senates, and creating a whole new Democratic world: he had invented the Art of Printing. The first ground handful of Nitre, Sulphur, and Charcoal drove Monk Schwartz’s pestle through the ceiling: what will the last do? Achieve the final undisputed prostration of Force under Thought, of Animal courage under Spiritual. A simple invention it was in the old-world Grazier,—sick of lugging his slow Ox about the country till he got it bartered for corn or oil,—to take a piece of Leather, and thereon scratch or stamp the mere Figure of an Ox (or Pecus); put it in his pocket, and call it Pecunia, Money. Yet hereby did Barter grow Sale, the Leather Money is now Golden and Paper, and all miracles have been out-miracled: for there are Rothschilds and English National Debts; and whoso has sixpence is sovereign (to the length of sixpence) over all men; commands cooks to feed him, philosophers to teach him, kings to mount guard over him,—to the length of sixpence.—Clothes too, which began in foolishest love of Ornament, 30what have they not become! Increased Security and pleasurable Heat soon followed: but what of these? Shame, divine Shame (Schaam, Modesty), as yet a stranger to the Anthropophagous bosom, arose there mysteriously under Clothes; a mystic grove-encircled shrine for the Holy in man. Clothes gave us individuality, distinctions, social polity; Clothes have made Men of us; they are threatening to make Clothes-screens of us.
‘The person who first made the work of Copyists easier with the invention of Movable Types was effectively disbanding armies, replacing most kings and senates, and creating an entirely new democratic world: he had invented the Art of Printing. The first handful of saltpeter, sulfur, and charcoal sent Monk Schwartz’s pestle flying through the ceiling: what will the last achieve? They will bring about the ultimate triumph of Thought over Force, and of Spiritual courage over Animal strength. It was a simple invention, back in the day, for a Grazier—tired of dragging his slow Ox around until he could trade it for grain or oil—to take a piece of leather and scratch or stamp the image of an Ox (or Pecus); put it in his pocket, and call it Pecunia, money. And so, Barter evolved into Sale, and the leather money has transformed into gold and paper, with all wonders being surpassed: there are now Rothschilds and English National Debts; whoever has a sixpence holds power (up to the value of sixpence) over all people; they can command cooks to feed them, philosophers to teach them, kings to protect them—up to the value of sixpence. Clothes, which started out as a silly desire for decoration, 30 have transformed into so much more! Soon, they provided increased security and warmth: but what of these? A sense of divine Shame (Schaam, Modesty), still unfamiliar to the devourer’s heart, quietly emerged under clothing; a mystical, grove-surrounded shrine for the sacred in humanity. Clothes gave us individuality, distinctions, and social structure; Clothes have made us into Men; they now threaten to turn us into mere Clothes-screens.
‘But, on the whole,’ continues our eloquent Professor, ‘Man is a Tool-using Animal (Handthierendes Thier). Weak in himself, and of small stature, he stands on a basis, at most for the flattest-soled, of some half-square foot, insecurely enough; has to straddle out his legs, lest the very wind supplant him. Feeblest of bipeds! Three quintals are a crushing load for him; the steer of the meadow tosses him aloft, like a waste rag. Nevertheless he can use Tools, can devise Tools: with these the granite mountain melts into light dust before him; he kneads glowing iron, as if it were soft paste; seas are his smooth highway, winds and fire his unwearying steeds. Nowhere do you find him without Tools; without Tools he is nothing, with Tools he is all.’
‘But overall,’ continues our eloquent Professor, ‘Man is a Tool-using Animal (Handthierendes Thier). Weak and small in stature, he stands on a base that’s barely the size of a flat shoe, quite insecurely; he has to spread his legs to keep from being blown away by the wind. The feeblest of bipeds! Three hundred pounds is a crushing weight for him; a cow can toss him up like a rag. Yet, he can use Tools and come up with new ones: with these, he can turn granite mountains into fine dust; he shapes glowing iron as if it were soft dough; the seas are his smooth highways, and the winds and fire are his tireless steeds. You won’t find him without Tools; without Tools, he is nothing; with Tools, he is everything.’
Here may we not, for a moment, interrupt the stream of Oratory with a remark, that this Definition of the Tool-using Animal, appears to us, of all that Animal-sort, considerably the precisest and best? Man is called a Laughing Animal: but do not the apes also laugh, or attempt to do it; and is the manliest man the greatest and oftenest laugher? Teufelsdröckh himself, as we said, laughed only once. Still less do we make of that other French Definition of the Cooking Animal; which, indeed, for rigorous scientific purposes, is as good as useless. Can a Tartar be said to cook, when he only readies his steak by riding on it? Again, what Cookery does the Greenlander use, beyond stowing-up his whale-blubber, as a marmot, in the like case, might do? Or how would Monsieur Ude prosper among those Orinocco Indians, who, according to Humboldt, lodge in crow-nests, on the branches of trees; and, for half the year, have no victuals but pipe-clay, the whole country being under water? But, on the other hand, 31show us the human being, of any period or climate, without his Tools: those very Caledonians, as we saw, had their Flint-ball, and Thong to it, such as no brute has or can have.
Here, for a moment, can we interrupt the flow of speech with a note that this definition of the Tool-using Animal seems to us, of all animal types, significantly the most accurate and best? Humans are called the Laughing Animal, but don’t apes also laugh or try to? And is the most manly person the one who laughs the most? Teufelsdröckh himself, as mentioned, laughed only once. We think even less of that other French definition of the Cooking Animal, which, in strict scientific terms, is pretty much useless. Can we say a Tartar cooks when he just prepares his steak by riding on it? And what cooking does the Greenlander really do, aside from storing his whale blubber, similar to how a marmot would behave in the same situation? Or how would Monsieur Ude manage among those Orinocco Indians, who, according to Humboldt, live in crow nests on tree branches and, for half the year, have no food except pipe clay, since the whole region is underwater? But, on the other hand, 31 show us a human being, from any time or place, without his tools: those same Caledonians, as we saw, had their Flint-ball and Thong, unlike anything a brute has or can have.
‘Man is a Tool-using Animal,’ concludes Teufelsdröckh in his abrupt way; ‘of which truth Clothes are but one example: and surely if we consider the interval between the first wooden Dibble fashioned by man, and those Liverpool Steam-carriages, or the British House of Commons, we shall note what progress he has made. He digs up certain black stones from the bosom of the earth, and says to them, Transport me and this luggage at the rate of five-and-thirty miles an hour; and they do it: he collects, apparently by lot, six-hundred and fifty-eight miscellaneous individuals, and says to them, Make this nation toil for us, bleed for us, hunger and sorrow and sin for us; and they do it.’
‘Man is a tool-using animal,’ concludes Teufelsdröckh in his blunt manner; ‘clothes are just one example of this truth. If we think about the time between the first wooden dibble made by humans and the Liverpool steam carriages or the British House of Commons, we can see how much progress we've made. He digs up certain black stones from the earth and tells them, Carry me and this luggage at thirty-five miles an hour; and they do it. He gathers, seemingly at random, six hundred and fifty-eight diverse people and tells them, Make this nation work for us, suffer for us, starve and grieve and sin for us; and they do it.’
CHAPTER VI
CHAPTER 6
APRONS
One of the most unsatisfactory Sections in the whole Volume is that on Aprons. What though stout old Gao, the Persian Blacksmith, ‘whose Apron, now indeed hidden under jewels, because raised in revolt which proved successful, is still the royal standard of that country’; what though John Knox’s Daughter, ‘who threatened Sovereign Majesty that she would catch her husband’s head in her Apron, rather than he should lie and be a bishop’; what though the Landgravine Elizabeth, with many other Apron worthies,—figure here? An idle wire-drawing spirit, sometimes even a tone of levity, approaching to conventional satire, is too clearly discernible. What, for example, are we to make of such sentences as the following?
One of the most disappointing sections in the entire volume is the one on Aprons. What about stout old Gao, the Persian blacksmith, “whose apron, now indeed hidden under jewels because he rose up in a successful rebellion, is still the royal standard of that country”? What about John Knox’s daughter, “who threatened Sovereign Majesty that she would catch her husband’s head in her apron rather than let him lie and be a bishop”? What about Landgravine Elizabeth, along with many other notable figures related to aprons—how do they fit in here? A careless tendency to stretch things out, sometimes even a tone of lightness that leans toward conventional satire, is too clearly evident. What, for example, are we supposed to make of sentences like the following?
‘Aprons are Defences; against injury to cleanliness, to safety, to modesty, sometimes to roguery. From the thin slip of notched silk (as it were, the Emblem and 32beatified Ghost of an Apron), which some highest-bred housewife, sitting at Nürnberg Workboxes and Toyboxes, has gracefully fastened on; to the thick-tanned hide, girt round him with thongs, wherein the Builder builds, and at evening sticks his trowel; or to those jingling sheet-iron Aprons, wherein your otherwise half-naked Vulcans hammer and smelt in their smelt-furnace,—is there not range enough in the fashion and uses of this Vestment? How much has been concealed, how much has been defended in Aprons! Nay, rightly considered, what is your whole Military and Police Establishment, charged at uncalculated millions, but a huge scarlet-coloured, iron-fastened Apron, wherein Society works (uneasily enough); guarding itself from some soil and stithy-sparks, in this Devil’s-smithy (Teufelsschmiede) of a world? But of all Aprons the most puzzling to me hitherto has been the Episcopal or Cassock. Wherein consists the usefulness of this Apron? The Overseer (Episcopus) of Souls, I notice, has tucked-in the corner of it, as if his day’s work were done: what does he shadow forth thereby?’ &c. &c.
‘Aprons serve as protections against harm to cleanliness, safety, modesty, and sometimes even mischievous behavior. From the delicate, notched silk (which symbolizes the etching and sanctified spirit of an apron) that a high-class housewife elegantly ties on while working with toys and crafts in Nürnberg, to the rugged leather strap that builders wear around their waist while they build and later put down their trowel, or to those noisy metal aprons worn by half-naked blacksmiths slamming and melting metal in their furnaces—there's so much variety in the style and roles of this garment! So much has been hidden and shielded by aprons! Honestly, if you think about it, what is your entire military and police system, costing countless millions, other than a massive, bright red, iron-clasped apron, within which society operates (rather uneasily), protecting itself from some dirt and sparks in this devilish workshop of the world? Yet, of all aprons, the one that confuses me the most is the Episcopal or Cassock. What’s the purpose of this apron? I notice the Bishop has tucked in one corner, as if his work is finished: what does that signify?’ &c. &c.
Or again, has it often been the lot of our readers to read such stuff as we shall now quote?
Or has it often happened that our readers have come across things like what we’re about to quote?
‘I consider those printed Paper Aprons, worn by the Parisian Cooks, as a new vent, though a slight one, for Typography; therefore as an encouragement to modern Literature, and deserving of approval: nor is it without satisfaction that I hear of a celebrated London Firm having in view to introduce the same fashion, with important extensions, in England.’—We who are on the spot hear of no such thing; and indeed have reason to be thankful that hitherto there are other vents for our Literature, exuberant as it is.—Teufelsdröckh continues: ‘If such supply of printed Paper should rise so far as to choke-up the highways and public thoroughfares, new means must of necessity be had recourse to. In a world existing by Industry, we grudge to employ fire as a destroying element, and not as a creating one. However, Heaven is omnipotent, and will find us an outlet. In the mean while, is it not beautiful to see five-million quintals of Rags picked 33annually from the Laystall; and annually, after being macerated, hot-pressed, printed-on, and sold,—returned thither; filling so many hungry mouths by the way? Thus is the Laystall, especially with its Rags or Clothes-rubbish, the grand Electric Battery, and Fountain-of-motion, from which and to which the Social Activities (like vitreous and resinous Electricities) circulate, in larger or smaller circles, through the mighty, billowy, storm-tost Chaos of Life, which they keep alive!’—Such passages fill us, who love the man, and partly esteem him, with a very mixed feeling.
‘I see those printed paper aprons worn by Parisian cooks as a new, albeit slight, outlet for typography; thus an encouragement for modern literature that deserves recognition. It’s also satisfying to hear that a well-known London firm plans to introduce the same trend, with significant expansions, in England.’—We, who are here on the ground, haven’t heard anything about it; and in fact, we should be grateful that, so far, there are other avenues for our literature, which is thriving. Teufelsdröckh continues: ‘If there’s so much printed paper that it starts to clog the highways and public pathways, we’ll need to find new solutions. In a world driven by industry, we’re reluctant to use fire as a destructive force instead of a creative one. However, Heaven is all-powerful and will find us a way out. Meanwhile, isn’t it wonderful to see five million quintals of rags collected annually from the laystall; and each year, after being soaked, pressed, printed on, and sold, they make their way back there, feeding so many hungry mouths along the way? Thus, the laystall, especially with its rags or clothing waste, serves as the great electric battery and fountain of motion, from which and to which the social activities (like different forms of electricity) circulate, in larger or smaller circles, through the vast, chaotic storm of life, which they keep alive!’—Such passages fill us, who admire the man and partially respect him, with very mixed feelings.
Farther down we meet with this: ‘The Journalists are now the true Kings and Clergy: henceforth Historians, unless they are fools, must write not of Bourbon Dynasties, and Tudors and Hapsburgs; but of Stamped Broad-sheet Dynasties, and quite new successive Names, according as this or the other Able Editor, or Combination of Able Editors, gains the world’s ear. Of the British Newspaper Press, perhaps the most important of all, and wonderful enough in its secret constitution and procedure, a valuable descriptive History already exists, in that language, under the title of Satan’s Invisible World Displayed; which, however, by search in all the Weissnichtwo Libraries, I have not yet succeeded in procuring (vermöchte nicht aufzutreiben).’
Farther down we come across this: ‘The journalists are now the true kings and clergy: from now on, historians, unless they’re foolish, must write not about Bourbon dynasties, Tudors, and Hapsburgs; but about stamped broad-sheet dynasties and brand new successive names, depending on which skilled editor or group of skilled editors captures the world’s attention. Of the British newspaper press, perhaps the most significant of all, and quite remarkable in its hidden structure and processes, a useful descriptive history already exists in that language, titled Satan’s Invisible World Displayed; which, however, I have not yet managed to find despite searching all the Weissnichtwo libraries (vermöchte nicht aufzutreiben).’
Thus does the good Homer not only nod, but snore. Thus does Teufelsdröckh, wandering in regions where he had little business, confound the old authentic Presbyterian Witchfinder with a new, spurious, imaginary Historian of the Brittische Journalistik; and so stumble on perhaps the most egregious blunder in Modern Literature!
Thus the great Homer not only nods off but also snores. Thus, Teufelsdröckh, wandering in places where he has no reason to be, confuses the old, genuine Presbyterian Witchfinder with a new, fake, made-up Historian of the Brittische Journalistik; and so he stumbles upon perhaps the most ridiculous mistake in Modern Literature!
CHAPTER VII
CHAPTER 7
MISCELLANEOUS-HISTORICAL
Happier is our Professor, and more purely scientific and historic, when he reaches the Middle Ages in Europe, and down to the end of the Seventeenth Century; the true era of extravagance in Costume. It is here that the Antiquary and Student of Modes comes upon his richest harvest. Fantastic garbs, beggaring all fancy of a Teniers or a Callot, succeed each other, like monster devouring monster in a Dream. The whole too in brief authentic strokes, and touched not seldom with that breath of genius which makes even old raiment live. Indeed, so learned, precise, graphical, and everyway interesting have we found these Chapters, that it may be thrown-out as a pertinent question for parties concerned, Whether or not a good English Translation thereof might henceforth be profitably incorporated with Mr. Merrick’s valuable Work On Ancient Armour? Take, by way of example, the following sketch; as authority for which Paulinus’s Zeitkürzende Lust (ii. 678) is, with seeming confidence, referred to:
Happier is our Professor, and more purely scientific and historical, when he discusses the Middle Ages in Europe, all the way to the end of the Seventeenth Century; the true period of extravagant costumes. This is where the Antiquary and the Fashion Student find their richest treasures. Outrageous outfits, surpassing the imagination of a Teniers or a Callot, follow one after another like monstrous creatures in a dream. The whole is presented in concise, authentic strokes, often touched with that spark of genius that makes even old clothing feel alive. Indeed, we have found these Chapters so learned, precise, graphic, and interesting, that it raises a relevant question for those involved: Should a good English translation of it be profitably included in Mr. Merrick’s valuable work On Ancient Armour? Take, for example, the following sketch; for which Paulinus’s Zeitkürzende Lust (ii. 678) is confidently cited as authority:
‘Did we behold the German fashionable dress of the Fifteenth Century, we might smile; as perhaps those bygone Germans, were they to rise again, and see our haberdashery, would cross themselves, and invoke the Virgin. But happily no bygone German, or man, rises again; thus the Present is not needlessly trammelled with the Past; and only grows out of it, like a Tree, whose roots are not intertangled with its branches, but lie peaceably underground. Nay it is very mournful, yet not useless, to see and know, how the Greatest and Dearest, in a short while, would find his place quite filled-up here, and no room for him; the very Napoleon, the very Byron, in some seven years, has become obsolete, and were now a foreigner to his Europe. Thus is the Law of Progress secured; and in Clothes, as in all other external things whatsoever, no fashion will continue.
‘If we looked at the German fashion of the Fifteenth Century, we might chuckle; similarly, those long-gone Germans, if they were to rise again and see our clothing, would probably cross themselves and call on the Virgin. But thankfully, no past German, or person, comes back to life again; so the Present isn’t unnecessarily burdened by the Past; it just grows out of it, like a tree, whose roots aren’t tangled with its branches but lie peacefully underground. It’s quite sad, yet not pointless, to see and understand how the Greatest and Dearest, in a short time, would find his place completely filled here, leaving no room for him; the very Napoleon, the very Byron, in about seven years, has become outdated and would now feel like a stranger in his own Europe. Thus is the Law of Progress ensured; and in clothing, as in all other external things, no fashion will last.’
35‘Of the military classes in those old times, whose buff-belts, complicated chains and gorgets, huge churn-boots, and other riding and fighting gear have been bepainted in modern Romance, till the whole has acquired somewhat of a sign-post character,—I shall here say nothing: the civil and pacific classes, less touched upon, are wonderful enough for us.
35 "I won’t say anything about the military classes from those old times, with their buff belts, complicated chains, gorgets, oversized churn-boots, and other gear for riding and fighting that have been romanticized in modern stories, making them feel almost like a signpost. Instead, let's focus on the civil and peaceful classes, which are fascinating enough on their own."
‘Rich men, I find, have Teusinke’ (a perhaps untranslateable article); ‘also a silver girdle, whereat hang little bells; so that when a man walks, it is with continual jingling. Some few, of musical turn, have a whole chime of bells (Glockenspiel) fastened there; which, especially in sudden whirls, and the other accidents of walking, has a grateful effect. Observe too how fond they are of peaks, and Gothic-arch intersections. The male world wears peaked caps, an ell long, which hang bobbing over the side (schief): their shoes are peaked in front, also to the length of an ell, and laced on the side with tags; even the wooden shoes have their ell-long noses: some also clap bells on the peak. Further, according to my authority, the men have breeches without seat (ohne Gesäss): these they fasten peakwise to their shirts; and the long round doublet must overlap them.
‘Rich men, I notice, have Teusinke’ (a possibly untranslatable item); ‘they also sport a silver belt with little bells hanging from it, so that when a guy walks, it's a continuous jingling sound. A few, who enjoy music, have an entire set of bells (Glockenspiel) attached there; which, especially during sudden turns and other walking mishaps, creates a delightful effect. Observe how much they love points and Gothic-arch designs. The men wear long, pointed caps that droop over to the side (schief): their shoes are pointed at the front, also around the length of a yard, laced up the side with tags; even their wooden shoes have long, pointed tips: some even add bells to the point. Furthermore, according to my sources, the men wear pants without a seat (ohne Gesäss): they fasten them pointy-wise to their shirts, and the long round doublet has to overlap them.'
‘Rich maidens, again, flit abroad in gowns scolloped out behind and before, so that back and breast are almost bare. Wives of quality, on the other hand, have train-gowns four or five ells in length; which trains there are boys to carry. Brave Cleopatras, sailing in their silk-cloth Galley, with a Cupid for steersman! Consider their welts, a handbreadth thick, which waver round them by way of hem; the long flood of silver buttons, or rather silver shells, from throat to shoe, wherewith these same welt-gowns are buttoned. The maidens have bound silver snoods about their hair, with gold spangles, and pendent flames (Flammen), that is, sparkling hair-drops: but of their mother’s headgear who shall speak? Neither in love of grace is comfort forgotten. In winter weather you behold the whole fair creation (that can afford it) in long mantles, with skirts wide below, and, for hem, not one but two sufficient hand-broad welts; all ending atop in a thick well-starched 36Ruff, some twenty inches broad: these are their Ruff-mantles (Kragenmäntel).
‘Rich young women, once again, flit around in dresses that are scalloped at the front and back, making their backs and chests nearly bare. On the other hand, high-status wives wear train gowns that are four or five yards long, with boys to carry their trains. Bold Cleopatras sailing in their silk-covered galleys, with a Cupid as their helmsman! Check out their hems, a hand's breadth thick, swaying around them; the long line of silver buttons, or rather silver shells, running from throat to shoe, with which these same hemmed gowns are fastened. The young women sport silver hair snoods adorned with gold sequins and dangling flames (Flammen), which are sparkling hair drops: but who will speak of their mother’s headgear? Even in the pursuit of grace, comfort is not neglected. In winter, you see all the lovely ladies (who can afford it) in long cloaks with wide skirts and, instead of just one, two hand-breadth hems; all topped with a thick, well-starched 36Ruff, about twenty inches wide: these are their Ruff-mantles (Kragenmäntel).
‘As yet among the womankind hoop-petticoats are not; but the men have doublets of fustian, under which lie multiple ruffs of cloth, pasted together with batter (mit Teig zusammengekleistert), which create protuberance enough. Thus do the two sexes vie with each other in the art of Decoration; and as usual the stronger carries it.’
‘Currently, women don't wear hoop skirts; however, the men have fustian doublets, under which they have multiple ruffs of fabric, glued together with batter (mit Teig zusammengekleistert), creating quite a bulge. Thus, both genders compete in the art of decoration, and as usual, the stronger one comes out on top.’
Our Professor, whether he hath humour himself or not, manifests a certain feeling of the Ludicrous, a sly observance of it, which, could emotion of any kind be confidently predicated of so still a man, we might call a real love. None of those bell-girdles, bushel-breeches, cornuted shoes, or other the like phenomena, of which the History of Dress offers so many, escape him: more especially the mischances, or striking adventures, incident to the wearers of such, are noticed with due fidelity. Sir Walter Raleigh’s fine mantle, which he spread in the mud under Queen Elizabeth’s feet, appears to provoke little enthusiasm in him; he merely asks, Whether at that period the Maiden Queen ‘was red-painted on the nose, and white-painted on the cheeks, as her tire-women, when from spleen and wrinkles she would no longer look in any glass, were wont to serve her?’ We can answer that Sir Walter knew well what he was doing, and had the Maiden Queen been stuffed parchment dyed in verdigris, would have done the same.
Our professor, whether he has a sense of humor or not, shows a certain appreciation for the ridiculous, a subtle awareness of it, which, if we could confidently ascribe any emotion to such a reserved man, we might call a genuine affection. None of those bell-shaped skirts, baggy trousers, crazy shoes, or other similar styles that the History of Dress includes escape his notice; especially the mishaps or remarkable events that happen to the wearers of such clothing are observed with great accuracy. Sir Walter Raleigh's fine cloak, which he laid in the mud under Queen Elizabeth’s feet, seems to elicit little excitement from him; he just asks whether, at that time, the Virgin Queen was "red-painted on the nose and white-painted on the cheeks, as her maids used to do when, out of frustration with wrinkles, she wouldn't look in any mirror anymore?" We can say that Sir Walter knew exactly what he was doing, and if the Virgin Queen had been just a piece of dyed parchment, he would have done the same.
Thus too, treating of those enormous habiliments, that were not only slashed and galooned, but artificially swollen-out on the broader parts of the body, by introduction of Bran,—our Professor fails not to comment on that luckless Courtier, who having seated himself on a chair with some projecting nail on it, and therefrom rising, to pay his devoir on the entrance of Majesty, instantaneously emitted several pecks of dry wheat-dust: and stood there diminished to a spindle, his galoons and slashes dangling sorrowful and flabby round him. Whereupon the Professor publishes this reflection:
Thus too, discussing those enormous outfits that were not only slashed and decorated but also artificially puffed out around the broader parts of the body by the addition of bran, our Professor doesn’t miss the chance to comment on that unfortunate courtier who, having sat down on a chair with a protruding nail and then standing up to pay his respects upon the entrance of Majesty, immediately released several clumps of dry wheat dust: and stood there looking like a stick, his decorations and slashes hanging sadly and limply around him. The Professor then shares this thought:
‘By what strange chances do we live in History? 37Erostratus by a torch; Milo by a bullock; Henry Darnley, an unfledged booby and bustard, by his limbs; most Kings and Queens by being born under such and such a bed-tester; Boileau Despréaux (according to Helvetius) by the peck of a turkey; and this ill-starred individual by a rent in his breeches,—for no Memoirist of Kaiser Otto’s Court omits him. Vain was the prayer of Themistocles for a talent of Forgetting: my Friends, yield cheerfully to Destiny, and read since it is written.’—Has Teufelsdröckh to be put in mind that, nearly related to the impossible talent of Forgetting, stands that talent of Silence, which even travelling Englishmen manifest?
‘By what strange circumstances do we exist in History? 37Erostratus by a torch; Milo by a bull; Henry Darnley, a foolish and clueless guy, by his actions; most Kings and Queens by being born under certain circumstances; Boileau Despréaux (according to Helvetius) by the peck of a turkey; and this unfortunate individual by a tear in his pants,—for no Memoirist of Kaiser Otto’s Court leaves him out. Themistocles’ prayer for a talent of Forgetting was in vain: my Friends, accept your fate, and read since it is written.’—Does Teufelsdröckh need to be reminded that, closely related to the impossible talent of Forgetting, lies that talent of Silence, which even traveling Englishmen manage to show?
‘The simplest costume,’ observes our Professor, ‘which I anywhere find alluded to in History, is that used as regimental, by Bolivar’s Cavalry, in the late Columbian wars. A square Blanket, twelve feet in diagonal, is provided (some were wont to cut-off the corners, and make it circular): in the centre a slit is effected eighteen inches long; through this the mother-naked Trooper introduces his head and neck: and so rides shielded from all weather, and in battle from many strokes (for he rolls it about his left arm); and not only dressed, but harnessed and draperied.’
‘The simplest costume,’ our Professor notes, ‘that I’ve ever seen mentioned in history is the one used by Bolivar’s Cavalry during the late Colombian wars. They used a square blanket, twelve feet diagonally. Some would cut corners to make it circular. In the center, there’s an eighteen-inch slit through which the totally naked trooper puts his head and neck. This way, he rides protected from all kinds of weather, and in battle from many blows (he wraps it around his left arm); not just dressed, but also equipped and draped.’
With which picture of a State of Nature, affecting by its singularity, and Old-Roman contempt of the superfluous, we shall quit this part of our subject.
With this depiction of a State of Nature, influenced by its uniqueness and an old Roman disdain for excess, we will move on from this part of our topic.
CHAPTER VIII
CHAPTER 8
THE WORLD OUT OF CLOTHES
If in the Descriptive-Historical portion of this Volume, Teufelsdröckh, discussing merely the Werden (Origin and successive Improvement) of Clothes, has astonished many a reader, much more will he in the Speculative-Philosophical portion, which treats of their Wirken, or Influences. It is here that the present Editor first feels the pressure of his task; for here 38properly the higher and new Philosophy of Clothes commences: an untried, almost inconceivable region, or chaos; in venturing upon which, how difficult, yet how unspeakably important is it to know what course, of survey and conquest, is the true one; where the footing is firm substance and will bear us, where it is hollow, or mere cloud, and may engulf us! Teufelsdröckh undertakes no less than to expound the moral, political, even religious Influences of Clothes; he undertakes to make manifest, in its thousandfold bearings, this grand Proposition, that Man’s earthly interests ‘are all hooked and buttoned together, and held up, by Clothes.’ He says in so many words, ‘Society is founded upon Cloth’; and again, ‘Society sails through the Infinitude on Cloth, as on a Faust’s Mantle, or rather like the Sheet of clean and unclean beasts in the Apostle’s Dream; and without such Sheet or Mantle, would sink to endless depths, or mount to inane limboes, and in either case be no more.’
If in the Descriptive-Historical section of this Volume, Teufelsdröckh, while simply discussing the Werden (Origin and gradual Improvement) of Clothes, has surprised many readers, he will astonish them even more in the Speculative-Philosophical section, which focuses on their Wirken, or Influences. Here is where the current Editor first feels the weight of his task; for this is where 38 the higher and new Philosophy of Clothes truly begins: an unexplored, almost unimaginable territory, or chaos; in navigating this, it’s both challenging and incredibly important to understand what path, what survey and conquest, is the right one; where the ground is solid and can support us, and where it is shallow, or merely an illusion, and could swallow us up! Teufelsdröckh takes on the monumental task of explaining the moral, political, and even religious Influences of Clothes; he aims to reveal, in its many forms, the fundamental idea that Man’s earthly concerns ‘are all hooked and buttoned together, and held up, by Clothes.’ He states plainly, ‘Society is built on Cloth’; and again, ‘Society sails through the Infinite on Cloth, like on Faust’s Mantle, or rather like the Sheet of clean and unclean animals in the Apostle’s Dream; and without such Sheet or Mantle, it would sink into endless depths or rise to empty limbos, and in either case cease to exist.’
By what chains, or indeed infinitely complected tissues, of Meditation this grand Theorem is here unfolded, and innumerable practical Corollaries are drawn therefrom, it were perhaps a mad ambition to attempt exhibiting. Our Professor’s method is not, in any case, that of common school Logic, where the truths all stand in a row, each holding by the skirts of the other; but at best that of practical Reason, proceeding by large Intuition over whole systematic groups and kingdoms; whereby, we might say, a noble complexity, almost like that of Nature, reigns in his Philosophy, or spiritual Picture of Nature: a mighty maze, yet, as faith whispers, not without a plan. Nay we complained above, that a certain ignoble complexity, what we must call mere confusion, was also discernible. Often, also, we have to exclaim: Would to Heaven those same Biographical Documents were come! For it seems as if the demonstration lay much in the Author’s individuality; as if it were not Argument that had taught him, but Experience. At present it is only in local glimpses, and by significant fragments, picked often at wide-enough intervals from the original Volume, and carefully collated, that we can hope to impart some outline 39or foreshadow of this Doctrine. Readers of any intelligence are once more invited to favour us with their most concentrated attention: let these, after intense consideration, and not till then, pronounce, Whether on the utmost verge of our actual horizon there is not a looming as of Land; a promise of new Fortunate Islands, perhaps whole undiscovered Americas, for such as have canvas to sail thither?—As exordium to the whole, stand here the following long citation:
By what chains, or even infinitely complex networks, of thought this grand theory is revealed here, and countless practical implications are drawn from it, it might be somewhat ambitious to try to display. Our professor's method isn't, in any way, the typical school logic where truths line up, each one depending on the others; rather, it’s more about practical reasoning that moves through broad insights across entire systematic groups and categories. In this way, we could say a noble complexity, almost like that of nature, dominates his philosophy or spiritual depiction of nature: a vast maze, yet, as faith suggests, not without a plan. We have previously noted that a certain ignoble complexity, which we must call mere confusion, was also noticeable. Often, we find ourselves wishing: If only those same biographical documents would appear! Because it seems that the proof relies heavily on the author’s individuality; it's as if it’s not arguments that have taught him, but experience. Right now, we can only hope to share some outline or hint of this doctrine through local glimpses and significant fragments, often collected from the original volume at wide intervals and carefully organized. 39 Readers of any intelligence are once again invited to engage their focused attention: let them, after careful consideration, and not until then, declare whether on the far edge of our actual horizon there isn't something resembling land; a promise of new fortunate islands, perhaps entire undiscovered Americas, for those who have the means to sail there?—As an introduction to the whole, here stands the following lengthy citation:
‘With men of a speculative turn,’ writes Teufelsdröckh, ‘there come seasons, meditative, sweet, yet awful hours, when in wonder and fear you ask yourself that unanswerable question: Who am I; the thing that can say “I” (das Wesen das sich Ich nennt)? The world, with its loud trafficking, retires into the distance; and, through the paper-hangings, and stone-walls, and thick-plied tissues of Commerce and Polity, and all the living and lifeless integuments (of Society and a Body), wherewith your Existence sits surrounded,—the sight reaches forth into the void Deep, and you are alone with the Universe, and silently commune with it, as one mysterious Presence with another.
‘With people who tend to speculate,’ writes Teufelsdröckh, ‘there come times, reflective, sweet, yet terrifying moments, when in wonder and fear you ask yourself that unanswerable question: Who am I; the being that can say “I” (das Wesen das sich Ich nennt)? The world, with its noisy hustle, fades into the background; and, through the paper walls, stone structures, and the intricate layers of Commerce and Politics, and all the living and non-living layers (of Society and a Body), that encircle your Existence,—your vision reaches out into the empty Deep, and you are alone with the Universe, silently connecting with it, as one mysterious Presence with another.
‘Who am I; what is this Me? A Voice, a Motion, an Appearance;—some embodied, visualised Idea in the Eternal Mind? Cogito, ergo sum. Alas, poor Cogitator, this takes us but a little way. Sure enough, I am; and lately was not: but Whence? How? Whereto? The answer lies around, written in all colours and motions, uttered in all tones of jubilee and wail, in thousand-figured, thousand-voiced, harmonious Nature: but where is the cunning eye and ear to whom that God-written Apocalypse will yield articulate meaning? We sit as in a boundless Phantasmagoria and Dream-grotto; boundless, for the faintest star, the remotest century, lies not even nearer the verge thereof: sounds and many-coloured visions flit round our sense; but Him, the Unslumbering, whose work both Dream and Dreamer are, we see not; except in rare half-waking moments, suspect not. Creation, says one, lies before us, like a glorious Rainbow; but the Sun that made it lies behind us, hidden from us. Then, in that strange Dream, how we clutch at shadows as if they were substances; 40and sleep deepest while fancying ourselves most awake! Which of your Philosophical Systems is other than a dream-theorem; a net quotient, confidently given out, where divisor and dividend are both unknown? What are all your national Wars, with their Moscow Retreats, and sanguinary hate-filled Revolutions, but the Somnambulism of uneasy Sleepers? This Dreaming, this Somnambulism is what we on Earth call Life; wherein the most indeed undoubtingly wander, as if they knew right hand from left; yet they only are wise who know that they know nothing.
‘Who am I; what is this Me? A voice, a movement, an appearance;—some embodied, visualized idea in the Eternal Mind? I think, therefore I am. Alas, poor thinker, this takes us only a little way. Sure enough, I exist; and I recently did not: but where did I come from? How? Where am I going? The answer is all around us, written in every color and motion, expressed in every tone of joy and sorrow, in the intricate, multi-faceted, harmonious nature: but where is the keen eye and ear to whom that God-written revelation will convey clear meaning? We sit as if in an endless phantasmagoria and dream cave; endless, for the faintest star, the most distant century, lies not even closer to its edge: sounds and colorful visions flit around our senses; but Him, the Unslumbering, whose work both dream and dreamer are, we do not see; except in rare, half-awake moments, we do not suspect. Creation, as one says, lies before us like a glorious rainbow; but the sun that made it lies behind us, hidden from us. Then, in that strange dream, how we grasp at shadows as if they were solid; 40 and sleep most deeply while thinking we are most awake! Which of your philosophical systems is anything other than a dream theory; a calculated result, confidently given, where both the divisor and dividend are unknown? What are all your national wars, with their Moscow retreats and bloody, hate-filled revolutions, but the somnambulism of restless sleepers? This dreaming, this somnambulism is what we on Earth call life; in which most confidently wander, as if they know their right from their left; yet only those are truly wise who realize that they know nothing.
‘Pity that all Metaphysics had hitherto proved so inexpressibly unproductive! The secret of Man’s Being is still like the Sphinx’s secret: a riddle that he cannot rede; and for ignorance of which he suffers death, the worst death, a spiritual. What are your Axioms, and Categories, and Systems, and Aphorisms? Words, words. High Air-castles are cunningly built of Words, the Words well bedded also in good Logic-mortar, wherein, however, no Knowledge will come to lodge. The whole is greater than the part: how exceedingly true! Nature abhors a vacuum: how exceedingly false and calumnious! Again, Nothing can act but where it is: with all my heart; only, WHERE is it? Be not the slave of Words: is not the Distant, the Dead, while I love it, and long for it, and mourn for it, Here, in the genuine sense, as truly as the floor I stand on? But that same Where, with its brother When, are from the first the master-colours of our Dream-grotto; say rather, the Canvas (the warp and woof thereof) whereon all our Dreams and Life-visions are painted! Nevertheless, has not a deeper meditation taught certain of every climate and age, that the Where and When, so mysteriously inseparable from all our thoughts, are but superficial terrestrial adhesions to thought; that the Seer may discern them where they mount up out of the celestial Everywhere and Forever: have not all nations conceived their God as Omnipresent and Eternal; as existing in a universal Here, an everlasting Now? Think well, thou too wilt find that Space is but a mode of our human Sense, so likewise Time; there is no Space and no Time: We are—we know 41not what;—light-sparkles floating in the æther of Deity!
‘It’s unfortunate that all of metaphysics has been so incredibly unproductive until now! The secret of human existence is still like the Sphinx’s riddle: something we cannot solve; and the ignorance of which leads to death, the worst kind of death—spiritual death. What are your axioms, categories, systems, and aphorisms? Just words, words. Elaborate castles in the air are cleverly constructed from words, these words also fixed firmly in solid logic, yet no true knowledge will ever settle there. The whole is greater than the part: how undeniably true! Nature abhors a vacuum: how completely false and slanderous! Furthermore, Nothing can act but where it is: I wholeheartedly agree; but WHERE is it? Don’t become a slave to words: isn’t the distant, the dead, still present, as I love it, yearn for it, and grieve for it, here, in every real sense, as truly as the floor beneath me? But that same Where is it?, along with its companion When, are from the very beginning the primary colors of our dream-grotto; or rather, the canvas (the fabric of it) on which all our dreams and life-visions are painted! Still, hasn’t deeper contemplation revealed to people from every climate and era, that the Where's it at? and When, so mysteriously tied to all our thoughts, are just superficial attachments to thought; that the seer can perceive them as they rise up from the celestial Anywhere and Always: haven’t all cultures envisioned their God as omnipresent and eternal; existing in a universal Here, an everlasting Now? Think carefully, and you will also find that space is just a mode of our human perception, as is time; there is no space and no time: We exist—we just don’t know what;—light-sparkles drifting in the ether of the divine!
‘So that this so solid-seeming World, after all, were but an air-image, our Me the only reality: and Nature, with its thousandfold production and destruction, but the reflex of our own inward Force, the “phantasy of our Dream”; or what the Earth-Spirit in Faust names it, the living visible Garment of God:
‘So that this seemingly solid world, after all, is just an illusion, our Me being the only reality: and Nature, with its endless cycle of creation and destruction, is merely a reflection of our inner strength, the “phantasy of our Dream”; or what the Earth-Spirit in Faust calls it, the living visible Garment of God:
“In Being’s floods, in Action’s storm,
“In the floods of existence, in the storm of action,
I walk and work, above, beneath,
I walk and work, above, beneath,
Work and weave in endless motion!
Keep working and weaving nonstop!
Birth and Death,
Life and Death,
An infinite ocean;
An endless ocean;
A seizing and giving
A taking and a giving
The fire of Living:
The spark of life:
’Tis thus at the roaring Loom of Time I ply,
It’s like this at the roaring Loom of Time that I work,
And weave for God the Garment thou seest Him by.”
And create for God the Garment through which you see Him.
Of twenty millions that have read and spouted this thunder-speech of the Erdgeist, are there yet twenty units of us that have learned the meaning thereof?
Of the twenty million people who have read and quoted this powerful speech from the Erdgeist, are there still twenty individuals among us who have truly grasped its meaning?
‘It was in some such mood, when wearied and fordone with these high speculations, that I first came upon the question of Clothes. Strange enough, it strikes me, is this same fact of there being Tailors and Tailored. The Horse I ride has his own whole fell: strip him of the girths and flaps and extraneous tags I have fastened round him, and the noble creature is his own sempster and weaver and spinner; nay his own bootmaker, jeweller, and man-milliner; he bounds free through the valleys, with a perennial rain-proof court-suit on his body; wherein warmth and easiness of fit have reached perfection; nay, the graces also have been considered, and frills and fringes, with gay variety of colour, featly appended, and ever in the right place, are not wanting. While I—good Heaven!—have thatched myself over with the dead fleeces of sheep, the bark of vegetables, the entrails of worms, the hides of oxen or seals, the felt of furred beasts; and walk abroad a moving Rag-screen, overheaped with shreds and tatters raked from the Charnel-house of Nature, where they would have rotted, to rot on me more slowly! Day after day, I must thatch myself anew; day after day, 42this despicable thatch must lose some film of its thickness; some film of it, frayed away by tear and wear, must be brushed-off into the Ashpit, into the Laystall; till by degrees the whole has been brushed thither, and I, the dust-making, patent Rag-grinder, get new material to grind down. O subter-brutish! vile! most vile! For have not I too a compact all-enclosing Skin, whiter or dingier? Am I a botched mass of tailors’ and cobblers’ shreds, then; or a tightly-articulated, homogeneous little Figure, automatic, nay alive?
‘It was in a similar mood, feeling exhausted and overwhelmed by these deep thoughts, that I first stumbled upon the issue of Clothes. Strange enough, it seems to me, is this idea of having Tailors and Tailored. The horse I ride has its own complete coat: if you strip away the girths and flaps and extra tags I’ve attached to it, this noble creature is its own tailor and weaver and spinner; indeed, its own bootmaker, jeweler, and stylist; it runs freely through the valleys, always dressed in a rain-proof outfit; where warmth and comfort fit have reached perfection; not to mention, the aesthetic details have also been considered, and frills and trims, with a cheerful variety of colors, are neatly placed, and are never lacking. While I—goodness!—have covered myself with dead sheep’s wool, the bark of plants, the innards of worms, the hides of cattle or seals, the felt from furry animals; and I walk around a moving display of rags, piled high with scraps and tatters dragged from Nature’s graveyard, where they would have decayed, to decay on me more slowly! Day after day, I must cover myself anew; day after day, 42this miserable covering must lose some layer of its thickness; some layer, frayed by wear and tear, must be brushed off into the ash pit, into the dump; until gradually the whole thing has been brushed there, and I, the dust-making, visible rag-cutter, get new material to grind down. Oh how subhuman! vile! most vile! For don’t I also have a complete enclosing skin, either whiter or dirtier? Am I a messed-up collection of tailors’ and cobblers’ scraps, then; or a well-formed, cohesive little figure, automatic, even alive?’
‘Strange enough how creatures of the human-kind shut their eyes to plainest facts; and by the mere inertia of Oblivion and Stupidity, live at ease in the midst of Wonders and Terrors. But indeed man is, and was always, a blockhead and dullard; much readier to feel and digest, than to think and consider. Prejudice, which he pretends to hate, is his absolute lawgiver; mere use-and-wont everywhere leads him by the nose; thus let but a Rising of the Sun, let but a Creation of the World happen twice, and it ceases to be marvellous, to be noteworthy, or noticeable. Perhaps not once in a lifetime does it occur to your ordinary biped, of any country or generation, be he gold-mantled Prince or russet-jerkined Peasant, that his Vestments and his Self are not one and indivisible; that he is naked, without vestments, till he buy or steal such, and by forethought sew and button them.
‘It’s strange how humans ignore the most obvious facts; and through the sheer inertia of Forgetfulness and Ignorance, they live comfortably amidst Wonders and Horrors. But really, man is, and always has been, a blockhead and simpleton; much quicker to feel and accept than to think and reflect. Prejudice, which he claims to despise, is his ultimate authority; routines lead him around blindly; so let a Sunrise or the Creation of the World happen twice, and it stops being amazing, noteworthy, or even significant. Maybe not once in a lifetime does the average person, no matter the country or generation, whether a golden-clad Prince or a rustic Peasant, realize that his clothes and his identity are not one and the same; that he is bare, without clothing, until he buys or takes some, and thoughtfully sews and buttons them on.
‘For my own part, these considerations, of our Clothes-thatch, and how, reaching inwards even to our heart of hearts, it tailorises and demoralises us, fill me with a certain horror at myself and mankind; almost as one feels at those Dutch Cows, which, during the wet season, you see grazing deliberately with jackets and petticoats (of striped sacking), in the meadows of Gouda. Nevertheless there is something great in the moment when a man first strips himself of adventitious wrappages; and sees indeed that he is naked, and, as Swift has it, “a forked straddling animal with bandy legs”; yet also a Spirit, and unutterable Mystery of Mysteries.’
‘For me, these thoughts about our clothing and how it reaches deep into our very core, affecting and degrading us, make me feel a certain horror at myself and humanity. It’s almost like watching those Dutch cows, which, during the rainy season, you see grazing casually in jackets and petticoats (made of striped sacking) in the meadows of Gouda. Still, there’s something profound about the moment when a man first removes all those unnecessary layers and realizes he is truly naked, and, as Swift puts it, “a forked straddling animal with bandy legs”; yet also a Spirit, an incomprehensible Mystery of Mysteries.’
CHAPTER IX
CHAPTER 9
ADAMITISM
Let no courteous reader take offence at the opinions broached in the conclusion of the last Chapter. The Editor himself, on first glancing over that singular passage, was inclined to exclaim: What, have we got not only a Sansculottist, but an enemy to Clothes in the abstract? A new Adamite, in this century, which flatters itself that it is the Nineteenth, and destructive both to Superstition and Enthusiasm?
Let’s no polite reader be offended by the views presented at the end of the last chapter. The Editor himself, upon initially reading that unusual passage, felt tempted to exclaim: What, do we have not only a Sansculottist but also an opponent of clothing in general? A new Adamite in this century that believes itself to be the Nineteenth, and is destructive to both Superstition and Enthusiasm?
Consider, thou foolish Teufelsdröckh, what benefits unspeakable all ages and sexes derive from Clothes. For example, when thou thyself, a watery, pulpy, slobbery freshman and new-comer in this Planet, sattest muling and puking in thy nurse’s arms; sucking thy coral, and looking forth into the world in the blankest manner, what hadst thou been without thy blankets, and bibs, and other nameless hulls? A terror to thyself and mankind! Or hast thou forgotten the day when thou first receivedst breeches, and thy long clothes became short? The village where thou livedst was all apprised of the fact; and neighbour after neighbour kissed thy pudding-cheek, and gave thee, as handsel, silver or copper coins, on that the first gala-day of thy existence. Again, wert not thou, at one period of life, a Buck, or Blood, or Macaroni, or Incroyable, or Dandy, or by whatever name, according to year and place, such phenomenon is distinguished? In that one word lie included mysterious volumes. Nay, now when the reign of folly is over, or altered, and thy clothes are not for triumph but for defence, hast thou always worn them perforce, and as a consequence of Man’s Fall; never rejoiced in them as in a warm movable House, a Body round thy Body, wherein that strange Thee of thine sat snug, defying all variations of Climate? Girt with thick double-milled kerseys; half-buried under shawls and broad-brims, and overalls and mud-boots, thy very fingers cased in doeskin and mittens, thou hast bestrode that ‘Horse I ride’; and, though it were in 44wild winter, dashed through the world, glorying in it as if thou wert its lord. In vain did the sleet beat round thy temples; it lighted only on thy impenetrable, felted or woven, case of wool. In vain did the winds howl,—forests sounding and creaking, deep calling unto deep,—and the storms heap themselves together into one huge Arctic whirlpool: thou flewest through the middle thereof, striking fire from the highway; wild music hummed in thy ears, thou too wert as a ‘sailor of the air’; the wreck of matter and the crash of worlds was thy element and propitiously wafting tide. Without Clothes, without bit or saddle, what hadst thou been; what had thy fleet quadruped been?—Nature is good, but she is not the best: here truly was the victory of Art over Nature. A thunderbolt indeed might have pierced thee; all short of this thou couldst defy.
Consider, you foolish Teufelsdröckh, what amazing benefits all ages and genders get from clothes. For instance, when you, as a watery, squishy, drooling freshman new to this planet, sat there drooling and puking in your nurse’s arms; sucking your pacifier and looking out at the world in the blankest way, what would you have been without your blankets, bibs, and other unnamed coverings? A terror to yourself and to mankind! Or have you forgotten the day you first received pants, and your long clothes became short? The whole village where you lived knew about it; neighbor after neighbor kissed your pudgy cheek and gave you, as a small gift, silver or copper coins on that first big day of your life. Once again, weren’t you, at one point in your life, a dandy, a blood, or a macaroni, or whatever name distinguished that phenomenon based on the year and place? In that one word lie mysterious volumes. Now, when the era of foolishness is over or changed, and your clothes are not for show but for protection, did you always wear them out of necessity, a consequence of Man’s Fall; did you never enjoy them as a cozy mobile home, a body surrounding your Body, where that strange You of yours sat snug, defying all changes in climate? Clad in thick, sturdy woolen fabrics; half-buried under shawls and wide-brimmed hats, along with overalls and mud-boots, with your fingers covered in soft leather and mittens, you have ridden that 'Horse I ride'; and even in the middle of 44 a wild winter, you dashed through the world, reveling in it as if you were its master. The sleet hit your head in vain; it only landed on your impenetrable woolen shell. The winds howled in vain—forests creaking and deep calling to deep—and the storms formed one massive Arctic whirlpool: you flew through the center of it, sparking fire from the road; wild music hummed in your ears, you were like a ‘sailor of the air’; the wreckage of matter and the crash of worlds was your realm and favorably carrying tide. Without clothes, without bit or saddle, what would you have been; what would your speedy four-legged friend have been?—Nature is good, but she isn’t the best: here truly was the triumph of Art over Nature. A thunderbolt might have struck you; everything short of this you could defy.
Or, cries the courteous reader, has your Teufelsdröckh forgotten what he said lately about ‘Aboriginal Savages,’ and their ‘condition miserable indeed’? Would he have all this unsaid; and us betake ourselves again to the ‘matted cloak,’ and go sheeted in a ‘thick natural fell’?
Or, cries the polite reader, has your Teufelsdröckh forgotten what he recently said about 'Indigenous Savages' and their 'really miserable condition'? Would he want all of this to be unspoken, and have us return to the 'matted cloak,' going around wrapped in a 'thick natural coat'?
Nowise, courteous reader! The Professor knows full well what he is saying; and both thou and we, in our haste, do him wrong. If Clothes, in these times, ‘so tailorise and demoralise us,’ have they no redeeming value; can they not be altered to serve better; must they of necessity be thrown to the dogs? The truth is, Teufelsdröckh, though a Sansculottist, is no Adamite; and much perhaps as he might wish to go forth before this degenerate age ‘as a Sign,’ would nowise wish to do it, as those old Adamites did, in a state of Nakedness. The utility of Clothes is altogether apparent to him: nay perhaps he has an insight into their more recondite, and almost mystic qualities, what we might call the omnipotent virtue of Clothes, such as was never before vouchsafed to any man. For example:
No way, dear reader! The Professor definitely knows what he’s talking about, and both you and we, in our rush, do him a disservice. If clothes, nowadays, ‘so tailor and demoralize us,’ do they have no redeeming qualities? Can’t they be changed to serve a better purpose? Do they really have to be discarded completely? The truth is, Teufelsdröckh, even though he’s a radical, is no Adamite; and as much as he might want to stand before this fallen age ‘as a Sign,’ he definitely doesn’t want to do it like those old Adamites did, in a state of Nakedness. He clearly sees the utility of clothes: in fact, he might even have an understanding of their deeper, almost mystical qualities, what we could call the all-powerful virtue of clothes, which has never been granted to any man before. For example:
‘You see two individuals,’ he writes, ‘one dressed in fine Red, the other in coarse threadbare Blue: Red says to Blue, “Be hanged and anatomised”; Blue hears 45with a shudder, and (O wonder of wonders!) marches sorrowfully to the gallows; is there noosed-up, vibrates his hour, and the surgeons dissect him, and fit his bones into a skeleton for medical purposes. How is this; or what make ye of your Nothing can act but where it is? Red has no physical hold of Blue, no clutch of him, is nowise in contact with him: neither are those ministering Sheriffs and Lord-Lieutenants and Hangmen and Tipstaves so related to commanding Red, that he can tug them hither and thither; but each stands distinct within his own skin. Nevertheless, as it is spoken, so is it done: the articulated Word sets all hands in Action; and Rope and Improved-drop perform their work.
‘You see two people,’ he writes, ‘one dressed in fine Red, the other in worn-out Blue: Red says to Blue, “Get hanged and dissected”; Blue hears this with a shudder, and (Oh, the wonders!) walks sorrowfully to the gallows; gets noosed, waits for his time, and the surgeons dissect him, fitting his bones into a skeleton for medical use. How is this; or what do you make of your Nothing can act but where it is? Red has no physical hold on Blue, no grasp on him, is not in contact with him: neither are those enforcing Sheriffs and Lord-Lieutenants and Hangmen and Tipstaves so connected to commanding Red that he can pull them here and there; but each stands separate within his own skin. Still, as it is said, so it is done: the spoken Word sets everything in Motion; and Rope and Improved-drop carry out their task.
‘Thinking reader, the reason seems to me twofold: First, that Man is a Spirit, and bound by invisible bonds to All Men; secondly, that he wears Clothes, which are the visible emblems of that fact. Has not your Red hanging-individual a horsehair wig, squirrel-skins, and a plush-gown; whereby all mortals know that he is a Judge?—Society, which the more I think of it astonishes me the more, is founded upon Cloth.
‘Thinking reader, I see two main reasons for this: First, that Man is a Spirit, connected by invisible ties to All Men; secondly, that he wears Clothes, which are the visible symbols of that fact. Doesn’t your Red hanging-individual have a horsehair wig, squirrel-skins, and a plush gown; so everyone knows he is a Judge?—Society, which amazes me more the more I consider it, is based on Cloth.
‘Often in my atrabiliar-moods, when I read of pompous ceremonials, Frankfort Coronations, Royal Drawing-rooms, Levees, Couchees; and how the ushers and macers and pursuivants are all in waiting; how Duke this is presented by Archduke that, and Colonel A by General B, and innumerable Bishops, Admirals, and miscellaneous Functionaries, are advancing gallantly to the Anointed Presence; and I strive, in my remote privacy, to form a clear picture of that solemnity,—on a sudden, as by some enchanter’s wand, the—shall I speak it?—the Clothes fly-off the whole dramatic corps; and Dukes, Grandees, Bishops, Generals, Anointed Presence itself, every mother’s son of them, stand straddling there, not a shirt on them; and I know not whether to laugh or weep. This physical or psychical infirmity, in which perhaps I am not singular, I have, after hesitation, thought right to publish, for the solace of those afflicted with the like.’
‘Often in my gloomy moods, when I read about grand ceremonies, Frankfort Coronations, Royal Drawing-rooms, Levees, and Couchees; and how the ushers, macers, and pursuivants are all on standby; how Duke this is introduced by Archduke that, and Colonel A by General B, with countless Bishops, Admirals, and various Functionaries marching boldly to the Anointed Presence; I try, in my private reverie, to create a clear image of that solemn event—suddenly, as if by some magician’s wand, the—should I say it?—the Clothes fly off the entire cast; and Dukes, Grandees, Bishops, Generals, even the Anointed Presence itself, all stand there, completely naked; and I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. This physical or mental quirk, which I suspect I’m not alone in experiencing, I have, after some hesitation, decided to share, for the comfort of those who are similarly affected.’
Would to Heaven, say we, thou hadst thought right to keep it secret! Who is there now that can read the 46five columns of Presentations in his Morning Newspaper without a shudder? Hypochondriac men, and all men are to a certain extent hypochondriac, should be more gently treated. With what readiness our fancy, in this shattered state of the nerves, follows out the consequences which Teufelsdröckh, with a devilish coolness, goes on to draw:
Would to Heaven, we say, you had thought it better to keep it a secret! Who can read the 46 five columns of Presentations in their morning newspaper without feeling a shiver? Hypochondriacal people, and honestly, all men are a bit hypochondriacal, should be treated with more care. Our imagination, in this fragile state of nerves, quickly follows the consequences that Teufelsdröckh, with a devilish calmness, continues to outline:
‘What would Majesty do, could such an accident befall in reality; should the buttons all simultaneously start, and the solid wool evaporate, in very Deed, as here in Dream? Ach Gott! How each skulks into the nearest hiding-place; their high State Tragedy (Haupt- und Staats-Action) becomes a Pickleherring-Farce to weep at, which is the worst kind of Farce; the tables (according to Horace), and with them, the whole fabric of Government, Legislation, Property, Police, and Civilised Society, are dissolved, in wails and howls.’
‘What would the Majesty do if such an accident were to actually happen; if all the buttons started at once, and the solid wool really evaporated, just like in a dream? Oh God! How everyone would rush to the nearest hiding spot; their grand State Tragedy (Haupt- und Staats-Action) would turn into a Pickle-Herring Farce to cry about, which is the worst kind of farce; the foundations (according to Horace), along with the entire structure of Government, Legislation, Property, Police, and Civilized Society, would fall apart, in wails and howls.’
Lives the man that can figure a naked Duke of Windlestraw addressing a naked House of Lords? Imagination, choked as in mephitic air, recoils on itself, and will not forward with the picture. The Woolsack, the Ministerial, the Opposition Benches—infandum! infandum! And yet why is the thing impossible? Was not every soul, or rather every body, of these Guardians of our Liberties, naked, or nearly so, last night; ‘a forked Radish with a head fantastically carved’? And why might he not, did our stern fate so order it, walk out to St Stephen’s, as well as into bed, in that no-fashion; and there, with other similar Radishes, hold a Bed of Justice? ‘Solace of those afflicted with the like!’ Unhappy Teufelsdröckh, had man ever such a ‘physical or psychical infirmity’ before? And now how many, perhaps, may thy unparalleled confession (which we, even to the sounder British world, and goaded-on by Critical and Biographical duty, grudge to re-impart) incurably infect therewith! Art thou the malignest of Sansculottists, or only the maddest?
Who can imagine a naked Duke of Windlestraw speaking to a naked House of Lords? My imagination feels suffocated like it’s in toxic air, unable to move forward with that image. The Woolsack, the Ministerial, the Opposition Benches—infandum! infandum! But seriously, why is this idea impossible? Weren’t all those Guardians of our Liberties nearly naked last night; 'a forked radish with a strangely carved head'? And why couldn’t he, if fate so decided, stroll out to St. Stephen’s just as easily as he went to bed in that strange fashion; and there, with other odd radishes, hold a Bed of Justice? ‘Comfort for those suffering similarly!’ Unfortunate Teufelsdröckh, has anyone ever had such a ‘physical or psychological issue’ before? And now, how many might your unique confession (which we, driven by our Critical and Biographical duty, reluctantly share with the decent British world) now be infecting incurably? Are you the most malicious of Sansculottists, or just the craziest?
‘It will remain to be examined,’ adds the inexorable Teufelsdröckh, ‘in how far the Scarecrow, as a Clothed Person, is not also entitled to benefit of clergy, and English trial by jury: nay perhaps, considering his 47high function (for is not he too a Defender of Property, and Sovereign armed with the terrors of the Law?), to a certain royal Immunity and Inviolability; which, however, misers and the meaner class of persons are not always voluntarily disposed to grant him.’ * * *
‘It will still need to be examined,’ adds the relentless Teufelsdröckh, ‘to what extent the Scarecrow, as a Clothed Person, is also entitled to the benefits of clergy and the English trial by jury: indeed, considering his 47 high function (for isn’t he also a Defender of Property, and a Sovereign armed with the terrors of the Law?), perhaps to a certain royal Immunity and Inviolability; which, however, the miserly and lower class of people are not always willing to grant him.’ * * *
* * * ‘O my Friends, we are (in Yorick Sterne’s words) but as “turkeys driven with a stick and red clout, to the market”: or if some drivers, as they do in Norfolk, take a dried bladder and put peas in it, the rattle thereof terrifies the boldest!’
* * * ‘Oh my friends, we are (in Yorick Sterne’s words) just like “turkeys being herded with a stick and a red rag, to the market”: or if some herders, like they do in Norfolk, take a dried bladder and fill it with peas, the noise it makes scares even the bravest!’
CHAPTER X
CHAPTER X
PURE REASON
It must now be apparent enough that our Professor, as above hinted, is a speculative Radical, and of the very darkest tinge; acknowledging, for most part, in the solemnities and paraphernalia of civilised Life, which we make so much of, nothing but so many Cloth-rags, turkey-poles, and ‘bladders with dried peas.’ To linger among such speculations, longer than mere Science requires, a discerning public can have no wish. For our purposes the simple fact that such a Naked World is possible, nay actually exists (under the Clothed one), will be sufficient. Much, therefore, we omit about ‘Kings wrestling naked on the green with Carmen,’ and the Kings being thrown: ‘dissect them with scalpels,’ says Teufelsdröckh; ‘the same viscera, tissues, livers, lights, and other life-tackle are there: examine their spiritual mechanism; the same great Need, great Greed, and little Faculty; nay ten to one but the Carman, who understands draught-cattle, the rimming of wheels, something of the laws of unstable and stable equilibrium, with other branches of wagon-science, and has actually put forth his hand and operated on Nature, is the more cunningly gifted of the two. Whence, then, their so unspeakable difference? From Clothes.’ Much also we shall omit about confusion of 48Ranks, and Joan and My Lady, and how it would be everywhere ‘Hail fellow well met,’ and Chaos were come again: all which to any one that has once fairly pictured-out the grand mother-idea, Society in a state of nakedness, will spontaneously suggest itself. Should some sceptical individual still entertain doubts whether in a world without Clothes, the smallest Politeness, Polity, or even Police, could exist, let him turn to the original Volume, and view there the boundless Serbonian Bog of Sansculottism, stretching sour and pestilential: over which we have lightly flown; where not only whole armies but whole nations might sink! If indeed the following argument, in its brief riveting emphasis, be not of itself incontrovertible and final:
It should now be clear that our Professor, as mentioned earlier, is a deeply radical thinker, leaning towards the more extreme side of things. He mostly sees the important aspects and rituals of civilized life that we value as nothing more than bits of fabric, simple poles, and "bladders filled with dried peas." A thoughtful audience wouldn’t want to spend too much time on such theories beyond what Science requires. For our purposes, it's enough to acknowledge that such a Naked World is possible, and in fact, it exists beneath the dressed-up version of reality we live in. Therefore, we will skip much talk about ‘Kings wrestling naked on the green with Carmen,’ and how the Kings were thrown: ‘dissect them with scalpels,’ says Teufelsdröckh; ‘the same organs, tissues, livers, entrails, and other life components are present: look into their spiritual makeup; the same great Needs, great Greeds, and limited Abilities; and it’s quite possible that the Carmen, who knows about draft animals, the fitting of wheels, some principles of balance, and has actually engaged with Nature, is the more skillful of the two. So, where does their huge difference come from? From Clothes.’ We will also leave out discussions about the confusion of ranks, and Joan and My Lady, and how it would just be everyone saying 'Hail fellow well met,' bringing back Chaos: all of which will naturally suggest itself to anyone who has truly imagined the grand overarching idea of Society in a state of nakedness. If some skeptical person still doubts whether a world without Clothes could have even the slightest Politeness, Government, or even Police, let them refer to the original Volume and see the vast and troubling swamp of Sansculottism, stretching bitter and corrupt: a place where not only entire armies but whole nations could sink! If indeed the following argument, with its concise and impactful nature, isn’t inherently indisputable and conclusive:
‘Are we Opossums; have we natural Pouches, like the Kangaroo? Or how, without Clothes, could we possess the master-organ, soul’s seat, and true pineal gland of the Body Social: I mean, a Purse?’
‘Are we opossums? Do we have natural pouches like the kangaroo? Or how, without clothes, could we have the master organ, the soul's seat, and the true pineal gland of the social body: I mean, a handbag?’
Nevertheless, it is impossible to hate Professor Teufelsdröckh; at worst, one knows not whether to hate or to love him. For though, in looking at the fair tapestry of human Life, with its royal and even sacred figures, he dwells not on the obverse alone, but here chiefly on the reverse; and indeed turns out the rough seams, tatters, and manifold thrums of that unsightly wrong-side, with an almost diabolic patience and indifference, which must have sunk him in the estimation of most readers,—there is that within which unspeakably distinguishes him from all other past and present Sansculottists. The grand unparalleled peculiarity of Teufelsdröckh is, that with all this Descendentalism, he combines a Transcendentalism, no less superlative; whereby if on the one hand he degrade man below most animals, except those jacketed Gouda Cows, he, on the other, exalts him beyond the visible Heavens, almost to an equality with the Gods.
Nevertheless, it's impossible to hate Professor Teufelsdröckh; at worst, you can't tell whether to hate or love him. Because while he looks at the beautiful tapestry of human life, with its royal and even sacred figures, he focuses not only on the bright side but mainly on the dark side; and indeed, he reveals the rough seams, rips, and various flaws of that ugly underside, with an almost devilish patience and indifference, which must have lowered him in the eyes of most readers. Yet, there’s something about him that profoundly sets him apart from all other past and present Sansculottists. The unique thing about Teufelsdröckh is that, despite this descent into darkness, he also possesses a transcendental perspective that's equally remarkable; so that, on one hand, he lowers humanity below most animals, except those well-fed Gouda cows, while on the other, he raises it above the visible heavens, almost to a level with the gods.
‘To the eye of vulgar Logic,’ says he, ‘what is man? An omnivorous Biped that wears Breeches. To the eye of Pure Reason what is he? A Soul, a Spirit, and divine Apparition. Round his mysterious Me, there lies, under all those wool-rags, a Garment of Flesh (or of Senses), contextured in the Loom of 49Heaven; whereby he is revealed to his like, and dwells with them in Union and Division; and sees and fashions for himself a Universe, with azure Starry Spaces, and long Thousands of Years. Deep-hidden is he under that strange Garment; amid Sounds and Colours and Forms, as it were, swathed-in, and inextricably over-shrouded: yet it is sky-woven, and worthy of a God. Stands he not thereby in the centre of Immensities, in the conflux of Eternities? He feels; power has been given him to know, to believe; nay does not the spirit of Love, free in its celestial primeval brightness, even here, though but for moments, look through? Well said Saint Chrysostom, with his lips of gold, “the true Shekinah is Man”: where else is the God’s-Presence manifested not to our eyes only, but to our hearts, as in our fellow-man?’
“To the eye of basic logic,” he says, “what is man? An all-eating biped that wears pants. To the eye of pure reason, what is he? A soul, a spirit, a divine apparition. Around his mysterious Me, beneath all those layers, there lies a garment of flesh (or of senses), woven in the loom of 49heaven; through which he is revealed to his kind and lives with them in Union and Division; and sees and creates a universe for himself, with blue starry spaces and long thousands of years. He is deeply hidden beneath that strange garment, surrounded by sounds, colors, and forms, as if wrapped up and inextricably shrouded: yet it is woven from the sky and worthy of a god. Does he not stand at the center of vastness, at the confluence of eternities? He feels; he has been given the power to know, to believe; and does not the spirit of love, free in its celestial primal brightness, even here, if only for moments, shine through? Well said Saint Chrysostom, with his golden lips, “the true Shekinah is man”: where else is God's Presence revealed not just to our eyes but also to our hearts, as in our fellow man?”
In such passages, unhappily too rare, the high Platonic Mysticism of our Author, which is perhaps the fundamental element of his nature, bursts forth, as it were, in full flood: and, through all the vapour and tarnish of what is often so perverse, so mean in his exterior and environment, we seem to look into a whole inward Sea of Light and Love;—though, alas, the grim coppery clouds soon roll together again, and hide it from view.
In these moments, unfortunately too infrequent, the deep Platonic Mysticism of our Author, which might be the core of his character, shines through, almost like a flood: and despite all the confusion and tarnish of what is often so twisted and petty in his surroundings, we seem to glimpse a vast inner Ocean of Light and Love;—though, sadly, the dark coppery clouds quickly gather again and conceal it from sight.
Such tendency to Mysticism is everywhere traceable in this man; and indeed, to attentive readers, must have been long ago apparent. Nothing that he sees but has more than a common meaning, but has two meanings: thus, if in the highest Imperial Sceptre and Charlemagne-Mantle, as well as in the poorest Ox-goad and Gipsy-Blanket, he finds Prose, Decay, Contemptibility; there is in each sort Poetry also, and a reverend Worth. For Matter, were it never so despicable, is Spirit, the manifestation of Spirit: were it never so honourable, can it be more? The thing Visible, nay the thing Imagined, the thing in any way conceived as Visible, what is it but a Garment, a Clothing of the higher, celestial Invisible, ‘unimaginable, formless, dark with excess of bright’? Under which point of view the following passage, so strange in purport, so strange in phrase, seems characteristic enough:
Such a tendency toward mysticism is evident in this man; indeed, for observant readers, it must have been clear long ago. Nothing he sees has just a simple meaning; everything has two meanings. Thus, whether he looks at the grand Imperial Sceptre and Charlemagne-Mantle or the humblest Ox-goad and Gypsy-Blanket, he observes both Prose, Decay, and Contempt, as well as Poetry and a deep Sense of Worth in each. Matter, no matter how insignificant, is Spirit—it’s a manifestation of Spirit. And even if something is held in great esteem, can it be more than that? The visible things, even imagined things, and anything conceived as visible, are merely a Garment, a Cloak for the higher, celestial Invisible, which is ‘unimaginable, formless, and dark with excess of brightness.’ Viewed this way, the following passage, so unusual in meaning and expression, seems to encapsulate this thought perfectly:
50‘The beginning of all Wisdom is to look fixedly on Clothes, or even with armed eyesight, till they become transparent. “The Philosopher,” says the wisest of this age, “must station himself in the middle”: how true! The Philosopher is he to whom the Highest has descended, and the Lowest has mounted up; who is the equal and kindly brother of all.
50 "The start of all wisdom is to gaze intently at clothes, or even with a penetrating view, until they become transparent. 'The Philosopher,' says the wisest person of our time, 'must position themselves in the middle': how true! The Philosopher is someone to whom the Highest has come down, and the Lowest has risen; who is the equal and compassionate brother of everyone."
‘Shall we tremble before clothwebs and cobwebs, whether woven in Arkwright looms, or by the silent Arachnes that weave unrestingly in our imagination? Or, on the other hand, what is there that we cannot love; since all was created by God?
‘Should we fear cloth webs and cobwebs, whether they're made in Arkwright looms, or spun by the silent Arachnes that tirelessly weave in our minds? Or, on the other hand, what is there that we cannot love; since everything was created by God?
‘Happy he who can look through the Clothes of a Man (the woollen, and fleshly, and official Bank-paper and State-paper Clothes) into the Man himself; and discern, it may be, in this or the other Dread Potentate, a more or less incompetent Digestive-apparatus; yet also an inscrutable venerable Mystery, in the meanest Tinker that sees with eyes!’
‘Lucky is the person who can see past a man's clothes—no matter if they're wool, flesh, bank notes, or official state garments—and see the man himself; and perhaps recognize in this or that powerful figure a somewhat flawed digestive system; yet also perceive an unfathomable, ancient mystery in even the humblest tinkerer who has eyes to see!’
For the rest, as is natural to a man of this kind, he deals much in the feeling of Wonder; insists on the necessity and high worth of universal Wonder; which he holds to be the only reasonable temper for the denizen of so singular a Planet as ours. ‘Wonder,’ says he, ‘is the basis of Worship: the reign of wonder is perennial, indestructible in Man; only at certain stages (as the present), it is, for some short season, a reign in partibus infidelium.’ That progress of Science, which is to destroy Wonder, and in its stead substitute Mensuration and Numeration, finds small favour with Teufelsdröckh, much as he otherwise venerates these two latter processes.
For the rest, as is typical for a person like this, he often reflects on the feeling of Wonder; he emphasizes the importance and value of universal Wonder, which he believes is the only sensible attitude for someone living on such a unique Planet as ours. ‘Wonder,’ he says, ‘is the foundation of Worship: the period of wonder is everlasting, indestructible in Humanity; only at certain times (like now), it is, for a brief moment, a reign in partibus infidelium.’ The advancement of Science, which aims to eliminate Wonder and replace it with Measurement and Calculation, gets little support from Teufelsdröckh, even though he otherwise holds these two processes in high regard.
‘Shall your Science,’ exclaims he, ‘proceed in the small chink-lighted, or even oil-lighted, underground workshop of Logic alone; and man’s mind become an Arithmetical Mill, whereof Memory is the Hopper, and mere Tables of Sines and Tangents, Codification, and Treatises of what you call Political Economy, are the Meal? And what is that Science, which the scientific head alone, were it screwed off, and (like the Doctor’s in the Arabian Tale) set in a basin to keep it alive, could prosecute without shadow of a heart,—but one other 51of the mechanical and menial handicrafts, for which the Scientific Head (having a Soul in it) is too noble an organ? I mean that Thought without Reverence is barren, perhaps poisonous; at best, dies like cookery with the day that called it forth; does not live, like sowing, in successive tilths and wider-spreading harvests, bringing food and plenteous increase to all Time.’
‘Will your Science,’ he exclaims, ‘only operate in the dimly lit, or even oil-lit, underground workshop of Logic? Will the human mind become just an Arithmetical Mill, where Memory acts like the Hopper, and simple Tables of Sines and Tangents, Rules, and Treatises of what you call Political Economy, serve as the Meal? And what kind of Science is it that the scientific mind alone could pursue, if it were removed and, like the Doctor’s head in the Arabian Tale, kept alive in a basin, without any sign of a heart—except for one other kind of mechanical and menial labor that the Scientific Mind (having a Soul in it) is too noble to engage in? I mean that Thought without Reverence is barren, maybe harmful; at best, it dies like cooked food with the day that produced it; it does not thrive, like farming, in successive planting and wider-spreading harvests, providing sustenance and abundant growth for all Time.’
In such wise does Teufelsdröckh deal hits, harder or softer, according to ability; yet ever, as we would fain persuade ourselves, with charitable intent. Above all, that class of ‘Logic-choppers, and treble-pipe Scoffers, and professed Enemies to Wonder; who, in these days, so numerously patrol as night-constables about the Mechanics’ Institute of Science, and cackle, like true Old-Roman geese and goslings round their Capitol, on any alarm, or on none; nay who often, as illuminated Sceptics, walk abroad into peaceable society, in full day-light, with rattle and lantern, and insist on guiding you and guarding you therewith, though the Sun is shining, and the street populous with mere justice-loving men’: that whole class is inexpressibly wearisome to him. Hear with what uncommon animation he perorates:
In this way, Teufelsdröckh delivers his hits, harder or softer, depending on his audience; yet always, as we like to believe, with good intentions. Above all, he finds that group of ‘Logic-choppers, and triple-pipe Scoffers, and self-proclaimed Enemies of Wonder; who, nowadays, roam around the Mechanics’ Institute of Science like night-watchmen, clucking like true Old-Roman geese and goslings around their Capitol, at any alarm or none at all; in fact, they often, as enlightened Skeptics, stroll into quiet society in broad daylight, with rattle and lantern, and insist on guiding and protecting you with them, even though the Sun is shining and the streets are filled with ordinary justice-loving people’: that entire group is incredibly tiresome to him. Listen to how passionately he expresses himself:
‘The man who cannot wonder, who does not habitually wonder (and worship) were he President of innumerable Royal Societies, and carried the whole Mécanique Céleste and Hegel’s Philosophy, and the epitome of all Laboratories and Observatories with their results, in his single head,—is but a Pair of Spectacles behind which there is no Eye. Let those who have Eyes look through him, then he may be useful.
‘The man who can’t wonder, who doesn’t regularly wonder (and admire), even if he were the President of countless Royal Societies and had all of the Mécanique Céleste and Hegel’s Philosophy, plus a summary of every Laboratory and Observatory with their findings, all in his head—is just a Pair of Glasses with no Eye behind them. Let those who have Eyes look through him; then he may be useful.'
‘Thou wilt have no Mystery and Mysticism; wilt walk through thy world by the sunshine of what thou callest Truth, or even by the hand-lamp of what I call Attorney-Logic; and “explain” all, “account” for all, or believe nothing of it? Nay, thou wilt attempt laughter; whoso recognises the unfathomable, all-pervading domain of Mystery, which is everywhere under our feet and among our hands; to whom the Universe is an Oracle and Temple, as well as a Kitchen and Cattlestall,—he shall be a delirious Mystic; to him thou, with sniffing charity, wilt protrusively proffer thy 52hand-lamp, and shriek, as one injured, when he kicks his foot through it?—Armer Teufel! Doth not thy cow calve, doth not thy bull gender? Thou thyself, wert thou not born, wilt thou not die? “Explain” me all this, or do one of two things: Retire into private places with thy foolish cackle; or, what were better, give it up, and weep, not that the reign of wonder is done, and God’s world all disembellished and prosaic, but that thou hitherto art a Dilettante and sandblind Pedant.’
‘You will have no mystery or mysticism; you will navigate your world by the brightness of what you call Truth, or even by the dim light of what I refer to as Attorney-Logic; and “explain” everything, “account” for everything, or believe none of it? No, you will try to laugh; whoever acknowledges the deep, all-encompassing realm of Mystery, which is all around us and within our reach; to whom the Universe is both an Oracle and a Temple, as well as a Kitchen and a Barn,—he shall be a mad Mystic; to him, you, with your condescending pity, will enthusiastically offer your 52hand-lamp, and scream, like someone wronged, when he kicks it away?—Poor Devil! Does your cow not give birth, does your bull not mate? You yourself, if you were not born, will you not die? “Explain” all this to me, or do one of two things: Retreat to private spaces with your foolish clatter; or, what would be better, give it up and weep, not that the age of wonder is over, and God’s world stripped of beauty and turned mundane, but that you have until now been a Dilettante and blind Pedant.’
CHAPTER XI
CHAPTER 11
PROSPECTIVE
The Philosophy of Clothes is now to all readers, as we predicted it would do, unfolding itself into new boundless expansions, of a cloudclapt, almost chimerical aspect, yet not without azure loomings in the far distance, and streaks as of an Elysian brightness; the highly questionable purport and promise of which it is becoming more and more important for us to ascertain. Is that a real Elysian brightness, cries many a timid wayfarer, or the reflex of Pandemonian lava? Is it of a truth leading us into beatific Asphodel meadows, or the yellow-burning marl of a Hell-on-Earth?
The Philosophy of Clothes is now unfolding to all readers, just as we predicted, expanding into new, limitless realms with a cloud-like, almost fantastical quality, yet not without hints of blue skies in the distance and glimmers of a heavenly light; it’s becoming increasingly important for us to figure out what this really means. Is that a real heavenly light, many anxious travelers wonder, or just the glow of hellfire? Is it a truth guiding us to blissful meadows, or the scorching desolation of a Hell-on-Earth?
Our Professor, like other Mystics, whether delirious or inspired, gives an Editor enough to do. Ever higher and dizzier are the heights he leads us to; more piercing, all-comprehending, all-confounding are his views and glances. For example, this of Nature being not an Aggregate but a Whole:
Our Professor, like other Mystics, whether crazy or inspired, keeps an Editor busy. He takes us to ever higher and more dizzying heights; his views and perspectives are more intense, all-encompassing, and utterly confusing. For instance, the idea that Nature is not just a collection, but a Whole:
‘Well sang the Hebrew Psalmist: “If I take the wings of the morning and dwell in the uttermost parts of the universe, God is there.” Thou thyself, O cultivated reader, who too probably art no Psalmist, but a Prosaist, knowing God only by tradition, knowest thou any corner of the world where at least Force is not? The drop which thou shakest from thy wet hand, rests not where it falls, but to-morrow thou findest it 53swept away; already on the wings of the Northwind, it is nearing the Tropic of Cancer. How came it to evaporate, and not lie motionless? Thinkest thou there is aught motionless; without Force, and utterly dead?
‘Well, the Hebrew Psalmist sang: “If I take the wings of the morning and dwell in the farthest parts of the universe, God is there.” You, the thoughtful reader, who are likely not a Psalmist but a writer, knowing God only by tradition, do you know any corner of the world where at least Force is not present? The drop you shake from your wet hand doesn't stay where it falls; tomorrow you'll find it 53 swept away; already on the wings of the Northwind, it's heading toward the Tropic of Cancer. How did it evaporate and not just stay still? Do you think there is anything motionless, without Force, and completely dead?
‘As I rode through the Schwarzwald, I said to myself: That little fire which grows star-like across the dark-growing (nachtende) moor, where the sooty smith bends over his anvil, and thou hopest to replace thy lost horse-shoe,—is it a detached, separated speck, cut-off from the whole Universe; or indissolubly joined to the whole? Thou fool, that smithy-fire was (primarily) kindled at the Sun; is fed by air that circulates from before Noah’s Deluge, from beyond the Dogstar; therein, with Iron Force, and Coal Force, and the far stranger Force of Man, are cunning affinities and battles and victories of Force brought about; it is a little ganglion, or nervous centre, in the great vital system of Immensity. Call it, if thou wilt, an unconscious Altar, kindled on the bosom of the All; whose iron sacrifice, whose iron smoke and influence reach quite through the All; whose dingy Priest, not by word, yet by brain and sinew, preaches forth the mystery of Force; nay preaches forth (exoterically enough) one little textlet from the Gospel of Freedom, the Gospel of Man’s Force, commanding, and one day to be all-commanding.
‘As I rode through the Black Forest, I thought to myself: That little fire that glimmers like a star across the darkening moor, where the sooty blacksmith hunches over his anvil, hoping to replace his lost horseshoe—is it just a tiny, isolated spot, cut off from the entire universe; or is it intricately connected to the whole? You fool, that smithy fire was initially kindled by the Sun; it's fueled by air that's been circulating since before Noah’s Flood, from beyond the Dog Star; within it, with the force of iron, the power of coal, and the distant, foreign power of humanity, there are hidden connections, struggles, and victories of force taking place; it is a small cluster, or nerve center, in the vast vital system of infinity. Call it, if you want, an unconscious altar, ignited on the heart of the All; whose iron sacrifice, whose smoky presence and influence reach throughout the entirety; whose grimy priest, not by words, but by thought and muscle, proclaims the mystery of force; indeed, proclaims (clearly enough) one small truth from the Gospel of Freedom, the Gospel of Human Force, commanding, and destined one day to command all.’
‘Detached, separated! I say there is no such separation: nothing hitherto was ever stranded, cast aside; but all, were it only a withered leaf, works together with all; is borne forward on the bottomless, shoreless flood of Action, and lives through perpetual metamorphoses. The withered leaf is not dead and lost, there are Forces in it and around it, though working in inverse order; else how could it rot? Despise not the rag from which man makes Paper, or the litter from which the earth makes Corn. Rightly viewed no meanest object is insignificant; all objects are as windows, through which the philosophic eye looks into Infinitude itself.’
‘Detached, separated! I say there’s no such thing as separation: nothing has ever been stranded or cast aside; everything, even a withered leaf, works together with all; it is carried forward on the endless, boundless flow of Action and goes through constant changes. The withered leaf isn’t dead and lost; there are Forces in it and around it, even if they’re working in reverse; otherwise, how could it rot? Don’t look down on the rag that man turns into Paper, or the waste that the earth turns into Corn. When seen the right way, no humble object is insignificant; all objects are like windows through which the thoughtful eye gazes into Infinity itself.’
Again, leaving that wondrous Schwarzwald Smithy-Altar, what vacant, high-sailing air-ships are these, and whither will they sail with us?
Again, leaving that amazing Schwarzwald Smithy-Altar, what empty, soaring airships are these, and where will they take us?
54‘All visible things are emblems; what thou seest is not there on its own account; strictly taken, is not there at all: Matter exists only spiritually, and to represent some Idea, and body it forth. Hence Clothes, as despicable as we think them, are so unspeakably significant. Clothes, from the King’s mantle downwards, are emblematic not of want only, but of a manifold cunning Victory over Want. On the other hand, all Emblematic things are properly Clothes, thought-woven or hand-woven: must not the Imagination weave Garments, visible Bodies, wherein the else invisible creations and inspirations of our Reason are, like Spirits, revealed, and first become all-powerful;—the rather if, as we often see, the Hand too aid her, and (by wool Clothes or otherwise) reveal such even to the outward eye?
54 "Everything we see is a representation; what you see isn't there just because it's there; technically, it's not there at all: Matter exists only in a spiritual sense, to express some Idea, and to embody it. That's why clothes, no matter how lowly we might think of them, are incredibly significant. Clothes, from the King’s robe on down, symbolize not just need, but a clever triumph over that need. Conversely, everything that symbolizes something is essentially clothing, whether it's created by thought or skill: doesn't the Imagination need to create garments, visible forms, through which the otherwise invisible creations and inspirations of our Reason are revealed, like Spirits, and become powerful for the first time; especially if, as we often see, the Hand also assists and (through wool clothes or otherwise) makes them visible to the outside world?"
‘Men are properly said to be clothed with Authority, clothed with Beauty, with Curses, and the like. Nay, if you consider it, what is Man himself, and his whole terrestrial Life, but an Emblem; a Clothing or visible Garment for that divine Me of his, cast hither, like a light-particle, down from Heaven? Thus is he said also to be clothed with a Body.
‘Men are rightly said to be dressed in Authority, dressed in Beauty, in Curses, and so on. In fact, if you think about it, what is Man himself, and his entire earthly existence, but a Symbol; a Clothing or visible Garment for that divine Me of his, cast down here, like a particle of light, from Heaven? This is why he is also said to be clothed with a Body.
‘Language is called the Garment of Thought: however, it should rather be, Language is the Flesh-Garment, the Body, of thought. I said that Imagination wove this Flesh-Garment; and does not she? Metaphors are her stuff: examine Language; what, if you except some few primitive elements (of natural sound), what is it all but Metaphors, recognised as such, or no longer recognised; still fluid and florid, or now solid-grown and colourless? If those same primitive elements are the osseous fixtures in the Flesh-Garment, Language,—then are Metaphors its muscles and tissues and living integuments. An unmetaphorical style you shall in vain seek for: is not your very Attention a Stretching-to? The difference lies here: some styles are lean, adust, wiry, the muscle itself seems osseous; some are even quite pallid, hunger-bitten and dead-looking; while others again glow in the flush of health and vigorous self-growth, sometimes (as in my own case) not without an apoplectic tendency. Moreover, 55there are sham Metaphors, which overhanging that same Thought’s-Body (best naked), and deceptively bedizening, or bolstering it out, may be called its false stuffings, superfluous show-cloaks (Putz-Mäntel), and tawdry woollen rags: whereof he that runs and reads may gather whole hampers,—and burn them.’
‘Language is often referred to as the Garment of Thought; however, it should really be described as the Flesh-Garment, the Body, of thought. I mentioned that Imagination created this Flesh-Garment; and doesn’t it? Metaphors are its fabric: take a closer look at Language; what, aside from a few basic elements (of natural sound), is it but Metaphors, recognized as such or not; still fluid and vibrant, or now solid and colorless? If those same basic elements are the rigid structures in the Flesh-Garment, Language,—then Metaphors are its muscles, tissues, and living coverings. You’ll search in vain for an unmetaphorical style: isn’t your very Attention a Stretching-to? The difference lies here: some styles are lean, dry, wiry, where the muscle itself feels bony; some are even pale, starved, and lifeless; while others glow with health and vigorous growth, sometimes (as in my own case) not without a tendency to excess. Additionally, 55there are fake Metaphors, which drape over that same Thought’s-Body (best left bare), deceptively embellishing or propping it up, and can be called its false stuffings, unnecessary show-cloaks (Putz-Mäntel), and cheap woolen rags: those who read can gather a whole bunch of them—and burn them.’
Than which paragraph on Metaphors did the reader ever chance to see a more surprisingly metaphorical? However, that is not our chief grievance; the Professor continues:
Than which paragraph on Metaphors did the reader every come across a more unexpectedly metaphorical? However, that’s not our main complaint; the Professor continues:
‘Why multiply instances? It is written, the Heavens and the Earth shall fade away like a Vesture; which indeed they are: the Time-vesture of the Eternal. Whatsoever sensibly exists, whatsoever represents Spirit to Spirit, is properly a Clothing, a suit of Raiment, put on for a season, and to be laid off. Thus in this one pregnant subject of Clothes, rightly understood, is included all that men have thought, dreamed, done, and been: the whole External Universe and what it holds is but Clothing; and the essence of all Science lies in the Philosophy of Clothes.’
‘Why create multiple examples? It’s stated that the Heavens and the Earth will fade away like a garment; and indeed, they do: the temporary covering of the Eternal. Everything that exists in a tangible way, everything that connects Spirit to Spirit, is essentially a form of Clothing, an outfit worn for a time and meant to be taken off. Therefore, within this one profound topic of Clothing, when understood correctly, encompasses everything that humanity has thought, envisioned, accomplished, and experienced: the entire External Universe and everything it contains is merely Clothing; and the essence of all knowledge lies in the Fashion Philosophy.’
Towards these dim infinitely-expanded regions, close-bordering on the impalpable Inane, it is not without apprehension, and perpetual difficulties, that the Editor sees himself journeying and struggling. Till lately a cheerful daystar of hope hung before him, in the expected Aid of Hofrath Heuschrecke; which daystar, however, melts now, not into the red of morning, but into a vague, gray half-light, uncertain whether dawn of day or dusk of utter darkness. For the last week, these so-called Biographical Documents are in his hand. By the kindness of a Scottish Hamburg Merchant, whose name, known to the whole mercantile world, he must not mention; but whose honourable courtesy, now and often before spontaneously manifested to him, a mere literary stranger, he cannot soon forget,—the bulky Weissnichtwo Packet, with all its Custom-house seals, foreign hieroglyphs, and miscellaneous tokens of Travel, arrived here in perfect safety, and free of cost. The reader shall now fancy with what hot haste it was broken up, with what breathless expectation glanced over; and, alas, with what unquiet disappointment it 56has, since then, been often thrown down, and again taken up.
Towards these dim, endlessly vast areas, bordering on the intangible void, the Editor travels and struggles with both anxiety and constant challenges. Until recently, a bright beacon of hope shone ahead of him in the expected assistance from Hofrath Heuschrecke; however, this beacon now fades, not into the bright red of morning, but into a vague, gray twilight, uncertain if it’s the dawn of day or the dusk of complete darkness. For the past week, he has held these so-called Biographical Documents in his hands. Thanks to the kindness of a Scottish merchant from Hamburg, whose name is known throughout the business world but shall remain unspoken; yet whose honorable generosity, both now and frequently in the past, he cannot easily forget—this bulky Weissnichtwo Packet, complete with all its customs seals, foreign symbols, and various tokens of travel, arrived safely and without charge. The reader can imagine the urgency with which it was opened, the breathless anticipation with which it was examined, and, alas, the restless disappointment that has often caused it to be tossed aside and picked up again. 56
Hofrath Heuschrecke, in a too long-winded Letter, full of compliments, Weissnichtwo politics, dinners, dining repartees, and other ephemeral trivialities, proceeds to remind us of what we know well already: that however it may be with Metaphysics, and other abstract Science originating in the Head (Verstand) alone, no Life-Philosophy (Lebensphilosophie), such as this of Clothes pretends to be, which originates equally in the Character (Gemüth), and equally speaks thereto, can attain its significance till the Character itself is known and seen; ‘till the Author’s View of the World (Weltansicht), and how he actively and passively came by such view, are clear: in short till a Biography of him has been philosophico-poetically written, and philosophico-poetically read.’ ‘Nay,’ adds he, ‘were the speculative scientific Truth even known, you still, in this inquiring age, ask yourself, Whence came it, and Why, and How?—and rest not, till, if no better may be, Fancy have shaped-out an answer; and either in the authentic lineaments of Fact, or the forged ones of Fiction, a complete picture and Genetical History of the Man and his spiritual Endeavour lies before you. But why,’ says the Hofrath, and indeed say we, ‘do I dilate on the uses of our Teufelsdröckh’s Biography? The great Herr Minister von Goethe has penetratingly remarked that “Man is properly the only object that interests man”: thus I too have noted, that in Weissnichtwo our whole conversation is little or nothing else but Biography or Auto-Biography; ever humano-anecdotical (menschlich-anekdotisch). Biography is by nature the most universally profitable, universally pleasant of all things: especially Biography of distinguished individuals.
Hofrath Heuschrecke, in a lengthy letter full of compliments, vague politics, dinner conversations, witty remarks, and other fleeting trivialities, goes on to remind us of what we already know: that no matter how abstract Metaphysics and other sciences originating purely from the intellect are, no Life-Philosophy, like this one about Clothes, which comes from character and speaks to that character, can be meaningful until we understand and recognize the character itself; until the author's worldview and how he arrived at that view—both actively and passively—are clear: in short, until a biography of him has been written and read in a way that combines philosophy and poetry. "Moreover,” he adds, “even if the speculative scientific truth were known, you would still, in this age of inquiry, ask yourself, Where did it come from, Why, and How?—and not rest until, if nothing better comes to mind, your imagination has shaped an answer; and either in the genuine details of fact or the fabricated ones of fiction, a complete picture and genetic history of the man and his spiritual endeavor is before you. But why," says the Hofrath, and indeed we say, "do I elaborate on the significance of our Teufelsdröckh's biography? The great Minister von Goethe astutely pointed out that 'Man is essentially the only object that interests man': thus I, too, have noticed that in Weissnichtwo, our entire conversation is little more than biography or autobiography; always human-anecdotal. Biography is by nature the most universally beneficial and enjoyable of all things, especially the biography of notable individuals.
‘By this time, mein Verehrtester (my Most Esteemed),’ continues he, with an eloquence which, unless the words be purloined from Teufelsdröckh, or some trick of his, as we suspect, is well-nigh unaccountable, ‘by this time you are fairly plunged (vertieft) in that mighty forest of Clothes-Philosophy; and looking 57round, as all readers do, with astonishment enough. Such portions and passages as you have already mastered, and brought to paper, could not but awaken a strange curiosity touching the mind they issued from; the perhaps unparalleled psychical mechanism, which manufactured such matter, and emitted it to the light of day. Had Teufelsdröckh also a father and mother; did he, at one time, wear drivel-bibs, and live on spoon-meat? Did he ever, in rapture and tears, clasp a friend’s bosom to his; looks he also wistfully into the long burial-aisle of the Past, where only winds, and their low harsh moan, give inarticulate answer? Has he fought duels;—good Heaven! how did he comport himself when in Love? By what singular stair-steps, in short, and subterranean passages, and sloughs of Despair, and steep Pisgah hills, has he reached this wonderful prophetic Hebron (a true Old-Clothes Jewry) where he now dwells?
‘By now, mein Verehrtester (my Most Esteemed),’ he continues, with a way of speaking that, unless he’s stealing words from Teufelsdröckh or using some sort of trick, which we suspect, is almost beyond understanding, ‘by now you are thoroughly immersed (vertieft) in that vast forest of Clothes-Philosophy; and looking around, as all readers do, with quite a bit of astonishment. The parts and passages you’ve already grasped and put into writing must surely spark a strange curiosity about the mind they came from; that perhaps unmatched mental mechanism that created such content and brought it to light. Did Teufelsdröckh have a father and mother? Did he once wear bibs and eat pureed food? Did he ever, in excitement and tears, embrace a friend's chest? Does he also gaze longingly into the long burial-aisle of the Past, where only the winds and their low harsh moan give undecipherable answers? Has he fought duels—good heavens! how did he behave when he was in love? By what unique staircases, in short, and hidden passages, and bogs of despair, and steep hills of the Promised Land, has he reached this extraordinary prophetic Hebron (a true Old-Clothes Jewry) where he currently resides?
‘To all these natural questions the voice of public History is as yet silent. Certain only that he has been, and is, a Pilgrim, and Traveller from a far Country; more or less footsore and travel-soiled; has parted with road-companions; fallen among thieves, been poisoned by bad cookery, blistered with bug-bites; nevertheless at every stage (for they have let him pass), has had the Bill to discharge. But the whole particulars of his Route, his Weather-observations, the picturesque Sketches he took, though all regularly jotted down (in indelible sympathetic-ink by an invisible interior Penman), are these nowhere forthcoming? Perhaps quite lost: one other leaf of that mighty Volume (of human Memory) left to fly abroad, unprinted, unpublished, unbound up, as waste paper; and to rot, the sport of rainy winds?
‘To all these natural questions, the voice of public History is still silent. It's certain that he has been, and still is, a Pilgrim, and a Traveler from a faraway place; more or less weary and travel-worn; has parted ways with companions on the road; fallen victim to thieves, suffered from bad food, and been bitten by bugs; yet at every stage (since they've allowed him through), he has had to settle the bill. But where are all the details of his journey, his weather notes, the picturesque sketches he made, though all documented (in invisible ink by an unseen inner writer)? Are they nowhere to be found? Perhaps they are completely lost: one more page from that huge book (of human Memory) left to drift away, unprinted, unpublished, unbound, like scrap paper; destined to decay, subject to rainy winds?’
‘No, verehrtester Herr Herausgeber, in no wise! I here, by the unexampled favour you stand in with our Sage, send not a Biography only, but an Autobiography: at least the materials for such; wherefrom, if I misreckon not, your perspicacity will draw fullest insight: and so the whole Philosophy and Philosopher of Clothes will stand clear to the wondering eyes of England, nay 58thence, through America, through Hindostan, and the antipodal New Holland, finally conquer (einnehmen) great part of this terrestrial Planet!’
‘No, dear esteemed Publisher, not at all! I am here, by the unique favor you have with our Sage, to provide not just a Biography, but an Autobiography: or at least the materials for one; from which, if I'm not mistaken, your insight will extract the fullest understanding: and thus the entire Philosophy and Philosopher of Clothes will become clear to the amazed eyes of England, and from there, through America, through India, and the opposite New Holland, ultimately conquer (occupy) a significant part of this Earth!’
And now let the sympathising reader judge of our feeling when, in place of this same Autobiography with ‘fullest insight,’ we find—Six considerable Paper-Bags, carefully sealed, and marked successively, in gilt China-ink, with the symbols of the Six southern Zodiacal Signs, beginning at Libra; in the inside of which sealed Bags lie miscellaneous masses of Sheets, and oftener Shreds and Snips, written in Professor Teufelsdröckh’s scarce legible cursiv-schrift; and treating of all imaginable things under the Zodiac and above it, but of his own personal history only at rare intervals, and then in the most enigmatic manner.
And now, let the sympathetic reader understand how we felt when, instead of this same Autobiography with ‘fullest insight,’ we discovered—six large Paper Bags, carefully sealed and labeled in gold ink with the symbols of the six southern Zodiac signs, starting with Libra. Inside these sealed bags are various sheets and often scraps of paper, written in Professor Teufelsdröckh’s barely legible cursiv-schrift; they cover every possible topic under the Zodiac and beyond, but only occasionally touch on his personal history, and even then in the most puzzling way.
Whole fascicles there are, wherein the Professor, or, as he here, speaking in the third person, calls himself, ‘the Wanderer,’ is not once named. Then again, amidst what seems to be a Metaphysico-theological Disquisition, ‘Detached Thoughts on the Steam-engine,’ or, ‘The continued Possibility of Prophecy,’ we shall meet with some quite private, not unimportant Biographical fact. On certain sheets stand Dreams, authentic or not, while the circumjacent waking Actions are omitted. Anecdotes, oftenest without date of place or time, fly loosely on separate slips, like Sibylline leaves. Interspersed also are long purely Autobiographical delineations; yet without connexion, without recognisable coherence; so unimportant, so superfluously minute, they almost remind us of ‘P.P. Clerk of this Parish.’ Thus does famine of intelligence alternate with waste. Selection, order, appears to be unknown to the Professor. In all Bags the same imbroglio; only perhaps in the Bag Capricorn, and those near it, the confusion a little worse confounded. Close by a rather eloquent Oration, ‘On receiving the Doctor’s-Hat,’ lie washbills, marked bezahlt (settled). His Travels are indicated by the Street-Advertisements of the various cities he has visited; of which Street-Advertisements, in most living tongues, here is perhaps the completest collection extant.
Whole collections exist where the Professor, or as he refers to himself in the third person, ‘the Wanderer,’ isn’t mentioned at all. Then again, within what seems like a deep discussion on metaphysics and theology, like ‘Detached Thoughts on the Steam-engine’ or ‘The Continued Possibility of Prophecy,’ we encounter some personal and significant biographical details. Some pages contain dreams, whether real or not, while the surrounding waking actions are left out. Anecdotes, often lacking a date or location, float freely on separate slips, like random leaves from a mythical oracle. There are also long purely autobiographical accounts, but they lack connection and recognizable organization; they’re so trivial and overly detailed that they almost remind us of ‘P.P. Clerk of this Parish.’ Thus, there’s a mix of ignorance and excess. The Professor seems to have no sense of selection or order. Every collection is the same chaotic jumble; only perhaps in the Bag Capricorn and those nearby is the confusion a bit worse. Next to a rather eloquent speech titled ‘On Receiving the Doctor’s Hat,’ are laundry bills marked bezahlt (settled). His travels are noted through street advertisements from the various cities he has visited, of which this collection is perhaps the most complete compilation in many living languages.
So that if the Clothes-Volume itself was too like a 59Chaos, we have now instead of the solar Luminary that should still it, the airy Limbo which by intermixture will farther volatilise and discompose it! As we shall perhaps see it our duty ultimately to deposit these Six Paper-Bags in the British Museum, farther description, and all vituperation of them, may be spared. Biography or Autobiography of Teufelsdröckh there is, clearly enough, none to be gleaned here: at most some sketchy, shadowy fugitive likeness of him may, by unheard-of efforts, partly of intellect, partly of imagination, on the side of Editor and of Reader; rise up between them. Only as a gaseous-chaotic Appendix to that aqueous-chaotic Volume can the contents of the Six Bags hover round us, and portions thereof be incorporated with our delineation of it.
So if the Clothes-Volume itself felt too much like a 59Chaos, we now have instead of the solar Luminary that should calm it, the airy Limbo which through mixing will further break it down and dissolve it! Since we may ultimately consider it our duty to place these Six Paper-Bags in the British Museum, we can skip further description and all criticism of them. There is clear enough no Biography or Autobiography of Teufelsdröckh to be found here: at best, some vague, shadowy version of him may, with extraordinary effort, partly of intellect and partly of imagination, by both the Editor and the Reader, emerge between them. Only as a gaseous-chaotic Appendix to that watery-chaotic Volume can the contents of the Six Bags float around us, and portions of it can be included in our portrayal of it.
Daily and nightly does the Editor sit (with green spectacles) deciphering these unimaginable Documents from their perplexed cursiv-schrift; collating them with the almost equally unimaginable Volume, which stands in legible print. Over such a universal medley of high and low, of hot, cold, moist and dry, is he here struggling (by union of like with like, which is Method) to build a firm Bridge for British travellers. Never perhaps since our first Bridge-builders, Sin and Death, built that stupendous Arch from Hell-gate to the Earth, did any Pontifex, or Pontiff, undertake such a task as the present Editor. For in this Arch too, leading, as we humbly presume, far otherwards than that grand primeval one, the materials are to be fished-up from the weltering deep, and down from the simmering air, here one mass, there another, and cunningly cemented, while the elements boil beneath: nor is there any supernatural force to do it with; but simply the Diligence and feeble thinking Faculty of an English Editor, endeavouring to evolve printed Creation out of a German printed and written Chaos, wherein, as he shoots to and fro in it, gathering, clutching, piercing the Why to the far-distant Wherefore, his whole Faculty and Self are like to be swallowed up.
Daily and nightly, the Editor sits (with green glasses) trying to make sense of these unbelievable Documents in their confusing cursive script; comparing them with the almost equally unbelievable Volume that’s in clear print. Amid this total mix of high and low, hot and cold, wet and dry, he struggles (by pairing like with like, which is Method) to build a solid Bridge for British travelers. Probably never since our first Bridge-builders, Sin and Death, constructed that enormous Arch from Hell-gate to Earth, has any Pontifex or Pontiff taken on such a task as this current Editor. Because in this Arch too, leading, as we humbly believe, somewhere quite different from that grand original one, the materials have to be pulled up from the boiling depths and down from the heated air, some here, some there, and skillfully cemented together, while the elements bubble underneath: and there’s no supernatural power to help; just the Hard Work and limited thinking ability of an English Editor, trying to create printed work from a German printed and written Chaos, where, as he darts back and forth, collecting, grabbing, and piercing the Why to the far-off Wherefore, his whole being is at risk of being consumed.
Patiently, under these incessant toils and agitations, does the Editor, dismissing all anger, see his otherwise robust health declining; some fraction of his allotted 60natural sleep nightly leaving him, and little but an inflamed nervous-system to be looked for. What is the use of health, or of life, if not to do some work therewith? And what work nobler than transplanting foreign Thought into the barren domestic soil; except indeed planting Thought of your own, which the fewest are privileged to do? Wild as it looks, this Philosophy of Clothes, can we ever reach its real meaning, promises to reveal new-coming Eras, the first dim rudiments and already-budding germs of a nobler Era, in Universal History. Is not such a prize worth some striving? Forward with us, courageous reader; be it towards failure, or towards success! The latter thou sharest with us; the former also is not all our own.
Patiently, through these endless struggles and stresses, the Editor, putting aside all anger, watches his otherwise strong health decline; he’s losing a portion of the natural sleep he once had each night, leaving him with little more than an irritated nervous system. What’s the point of health or life if it’s not to accomplish something? And is there any work more meaningful than bringing foreign thoughts into the barren ground of our own minds? Except, of course, for bringing forth your own thoughts, which only a few are lucky enough to do. As wild as it seems, this Philosophy of Clothes has the potential to uncover its true meaning and promises to unveil new eras, the first vague signs and already emerging seeds of a better future in Universal History. Isn’t such a treasure worth the effort? Let’s move forward together, brave reader; whether towards failure or success! You’ll share in the latter with us; the former isn’t solely ours either.
BOOK SECOND
CHAPTER I
CHAPTER 1
GENESIS
In a psychological point of view, it is perhaps questionable whether from birth and genealogy, how closely scrutinised soever, much insight is to be gained. Nevertheless, as in every phenomenon the Beginning remains always the most notable moment; so, with regard to any great man, we rest not till, for our scientific profit or not, the whole circumstances of his first appearance in this Planet, and what manner of Public Entry he made, are with utmost completeness rendered manifest. To the Genesis of our Clothes-Philosopher, then, be this First Chapter consecrated. Unhappily, indeed, he seems to be of quite obscure extraction; uncertain, we might almost say, whether of any: so that this Genesis of his can properly be nothing but an Exodus (or transit out of Invisibility into Visibility); whereof the preliminary portion is nowhere forthcoming.
From a psychological perspective, it's debatable whether much can be learned from someone's birth and family background, no matter how closely examined. Still, like with any phenomenon, the beginning is always the most significant moment; so, regarding any great person, we don't stop until we thoroughly uncover all the details of their first appearance on this planet and the nature of their public debut, whether for our scientific benefit or not. Therefore, let this First Chapter be dedicated to the beginnings of our Clothes-Philosopher. Unfortunately, he seems to come from a largely unknown background; we might say it's even unclear if he has any: so this beginning of his is really more of an Exodus (or a transition from invisibility to visibility), the initial part of which is nowhere to be found.
‘In the village of Entepfuhl,’ thus writes he, in the Bag Libra, on various Papers, which we arrange with difficulty, ‘dwelt Andreas Futteral and his wife; childless, in still seclusion, and cheerful though now verging towards old age. Andreas had been grenadier Sergeant, and even regimental Schoolmaster under Frederick the Great; but now, quitting the halbert and ferule for the spade and pruning-hook, cultivated a little Orchard, on the produce of which he, Cincinnatus-like, lived not without dignity. Fruits, the peach, the apple, the grape, with other varieties came in their season; all which Andreas knew how to sell: on evenings he smoked largely, or read (as beseemed a regimental Schoolmaster), and talked to neighbours that would listen about the Victory of Rossbach; and how Fritz the Only (der Einzige) had once with his own royal lips spoken to him, had been pleased to say, when Andreas as 62camp-sentinel demanded the pass-word, “Schweig Hund (Peace, hound)!” before any of his staff-adjutants could answer. “Das nenn’ ich mir einen König, There is what I call a King,” would Andreas exclaim: “but the smoke of Kunersdorf was still smarting his eyes.”
‘In the village of Entepfuhl,’ he writes in the Bag Libra, on various papers that we struggle to arrange, ‘lived Andreas Futteral and his wife; childless, in quiet solitude, and cheerful although now approaching old age. Andreas had been a grenadier sergeant and even a regimental schoolmaster under Frederick the Great; but now, trading the halberd and ruler for the spade and pruning shears, he tended a small orchard, from which he lived with dignity, much like Cincinnatus. Seasonal fruits like peaches, apples, and grapes grew abundantly, which Andreas knew how to sell: in the evenings, he enjoyed smoking a lot or reading (as befits a regimental schoolmaster) and chatting with neighbors who would listen about the Victory of Rossbach; and how Fritz the Only (der Einzige) had once spoken to him directly, had kindly said, when Andreas, as a camp sentinel, asked for the password, “Schweig Hund (Peace, hound)!” before any of his staff adjutants could respond. “Das nenn’ ich mir einen König, That’s what I call a King,” Andreas would exclaim: “but the smoke of Kunersdorf was still stinging his eyes.”
‘Gretchen, the housewife, won like Desdemona by the deeds rather than the looks of her now veteran Othello, lived not in altogether military subordination; for, as Andreas said, “the womankind will not drill (wer kann die Weiberchen dressiren)”: nevertheless she at heart loved him both for valour and wisdom; to her a Prussian grenadier Sergeant and Regiment’s Schoolmaster was little other than a Cicero and Cid: what you see, yet cannot see over, is as good as infinite. Nay, was not Andreas in very deed a man of order, courage, downrightness (Geradheit); that understood Büsching’s Geography, had been in the victory of Rossbach, and left for dead in the camisade of Hochkirch? The good Gretchen, for all her fretting, watched over him and hovered round him as only a true housemother can: assiduously she cooked and sewed and scoured for him; so that not only his old regimental sword and grenadier-cap, but the whole habitation and environment, where on pegs of honour they hung, looked ever trim and gay: a roomy painted Cottage, embowered in fruit-trees and forest-trees, evergreens and honeysuckles; rising many-coloured from amid shaven grass-plots, flowers struggling-in through the very windows; under its long projecting eaves nothing but garden-tools in methodic piles (to screen them from rain), and seats where, especially on summer nights, a King might have wished to sit and smoke, and call it his. Such a Bauergut (Copyhold) had Gretchen given her veteran; whose sinewy arms, and long-disused gardening talent, had made it what you saw.
‘Gretchen, the housewife, loved her seasoned Othello not just for his appearance but for his actions, much like Desdemona. She didn't completely submit to military life; as Andreas remarked, “you can’t train women.” Still, she deeply admired him for his bravery and intelligence; to her, a Prussian grenadier sergeant and a regiment's schoolmaster were as impressive as Cicero and El Cid. What is visible yet remains unseen feels infinite. Besides, wasn’t Andreas truly a man of discipline, courage, and straightforwardness? He understood Büsching’s Geography, had fought in the victory at Rossbach, and was left for dead in the ambush at Hochkirch? Despite all her worries, the good Gretchen cared for him and stayed near him like any devoted housemother would. She diligently cooked, sewed, and cleaned for him, ensuring not just his old regimental sword and grenadier cap, but their entire home appeared always neat and cheerful: a spacious, painted cottage surrounded by fruit trees and evergreens, with flowers bursting through the windows. Under its long eaves, only garden tools were neatly stacked to keep them dry from the rain, and there were seats where, especially on summer nights, a king might have wanted to sit and smoke, claiming it as his own. This charming property was what Gretchen gifted her veteran, whose strong arms and forgotten gardening skills had transformed it into what you see.’
‘Into this umbrageous Man’s-nest, one meek yellow evening or dusk, when the Sun, hidden indeed from terrestrial Entepfuhl, did nevertheless journey visible and radiant along the celestial Balance (Libra), it was that a Stranger of reverend aspect entered; and, with grave salutation, stood before the two rather astonished housemates. He was close-muffled in a wide mantle; 63which without further parley unfolding, he deposited therefrom what seemed some Basket, overhung with green Persian silk; saying only: Ihr lieben Leute, hier bringe ein unschätzbares Verleihen; nehmt es in aller Acht, sorgfältigst benützt es: mit hohem Lohn, oder wohl mit schweren Zinsen, wird’s einst zurückgefordert. “Good Christian people, here lies for you an invaluable Loan; take all heed thereof, in all carefulness employ it: with high recompense, or else with heavy penalty, will it one day be required back.” Uttering which singular words, in a clear, bell-like, forever memorable tone, the Stranger gracefully withdrew; and before Andreas or his wife, gazing in expectant wonder, had time to fashion either question or answer, was clean gone. Neither out of doors could aught of him be seen or heard; he had vanished in the thickets, in the dusk; the Orchard-gate stood quietly closed: the Stranger was gone once and always. So sudden had the whole transaction been, in the autumn stillness and twilight, so gentle, noiseless, that the Futterals could have fancied it all a trick of Imagination, or some visit from an authentic Spirit. Only that the green-silk Basket, such as neither Imagination nor authentic Spirits are wont to carry, still stood visible and tangible on their little parlour-table. Towards this the astonished couple, now with lit candle, hastily turned their attention. Lifting the green veil, to see what invaluable it hid, they descried there, amid down and rich white wrappages, no Pitt Diamond or Hapsburg Regalia, but, in the softest sleep, a little red-coloured Infant! Beside it, lay a roll of gold Friedrichs, the exact amount of which was never publicly known; also a Taufschein (baptismal certificate), wherein unfortunately nothing but the Name was decipherable; other document or indication none whatever.
‘On a quiet yellow evening, when the sun was hidden from the world, yet still journeyed clearly and brightly across the sky in Libra, a Stranger with a dignified appearance entered this shaded sanctuary. With a serious greeting, he stood before the two somewhat surprised residents. He was wrapped in a large cloak; 63and without further conversation, he revealed what appeared to be a basket draped in green Persian silk; saying only: Good Christian people, here lies for you an invaluable Loan; take all heed thereof, in all carefulness employ it: with high recompense, or else with heavy penalty, will it one day be required back. With these remarkable words, spoken in a clear, memorable tone, the Stranger gracefully left; and before Andreas or his wife, gazing in surprised wonder, could form a question or an answer, he completely disappeared. There was nothing to see or hear of him outside; he had vanished into the thickets, into the dusk; the orchard gate stood quietly closed: the Stranger was gone forever. The entire exchange had been so sudden, in the stillness and twilight of autumn, so gentle and silent, that the couple could have believed it was all a trick of their imagination or a visit from a genuine spirit. Only the green silk basket, something neither imagination nor authentic spirits usually carry, remained visible and tangible on their little table. The astonished couple, now with a lit candle, quickly turned their attention to it. Lifting the green veil to see what it concealed, they discovered, amidst soft bedding and rich white wrappings, not a Pitt diamond or Hapsburg regalia, but a little red-colored infant peacefully asleep! Next to it lay a roll of gold Friedrichs, the exact amount of which was never publicly known; also a Taufschein (baptismal certificate), which regrettably only had the name decipherable; no other document or indication was present.
‘To wonder and conjecture was unavailing, then and always thenceforth. Nowhere in Entepfuhl, on the morrow or next day, did tidings transpire of any such figure as the Stranger; nor could the Traveller, who had passed through the neighbouring Town in coach-and-four, be connected with this Apparition, except in the way of gratuitous surmise. Meanwhile, for Andreas and 64his wife, the grand practical problem was: What to do with this little sleeping red-coloured Infant? Amid amazements and curiosities, which had to die away without external satisfying, they resolved, as in such circumstances charitable prudent people needs must, on nursing it, though with spoon-meat, into whiteness, and if possible into manhood. The Heavens smiled on their endeavour: thus has that same mysterious Individual ever since had a status for himself in this visible Universe, some modicum of victual and lodging and parade-ground; and now expanded in bulk, faculty and knowledge of good and evil, he, as Herr Diogenes Teufelsdröckh, professes or is ready to profess, perhaps not altogether without effect, in the new University of Weissnichtwo, the new Science of Things in General.’
‘Wondering and guessing didn’t help, then or ever after. Nowhere in Entepfuhl, the next day or the day after, did news emerge of any figure like the Stranger; nor could the Traveller, who had gone through the nearby Town in a fancy coach, be linked to this Apparition, other than through wild speculation. Meanwhile, for Andreas and 64his wife, the main practical problem was: What to do with this little sleeping red-colored Infant? Amid the amazement and curiosity, which had to fade away without any external resolution, they decided, as charitable and sensible people must do in such cases, to care for it, hopefully nurturing it with spoonfuls of food into a healthy and strong adulthood. The Heavens favored their efforts: thus, this same mysterious Individual has since secured a place for himself in this visible Universe, some measure of food, shelter, and space to grow; and now, as he grows in size, ability, and understanding of good and evil, he, as Mr. Diogenes Teufelsdröckh, professes or is ready to profess, perhaps not without impact, at the new University of Weissnichtwo, the new Science of Things in General.’
Our Philosopher declares here, as indeed we should think he well might, that these facts, first communicated, by the good Gretchen Futteral, in his twelfth year, ‘produced on the boyish heart and fancy a quite indelible impression. Who this Reverend Personage,’ he says, ‘that glided into the Orchard Cottage when the Sun was in Libra, and then, as on spirit’s wings, glided out again, might be? An inexpressible desire, full of love and of sadness, has often since struggled within me to shape an answer. Ever, in my distresses and my loneliness, has Fantasy turned, full of longing (sehnsuchtsvoll), to that unknown Father, who perhaps far from me, perhaps near, either way invisible, might have taken me to his paternal bosom, there to lie screened from many a woe. Thou beloved Father, dost thou still, shut out from me only by thin penetrable curtains of earthly Space, wend to and fro among the crowd of the living? Or art thou hidden by those far thicker curtains of the Everlasting Night, or rather of the Everlasting Day, through which my mortal eye and outstretched arms need not strive to reach? Alas, I know not, and in vain vex myself to know. More than once, heart-deluded, have I taken for thee this and the other noble-looking Stranger; and approached him wistfully, with infinite regard; but he too had to repel me; he too was not thou.
Our Philosopher states here, as we would assume he might, that these facts, first shared by the kind Gretchen Futteral during his twelfth year, ‘left a lasting impression on the boy's heart and imagination. Who could this Reverend Person be,’ he asks, ‘who slipped into Orchard Cottage when the Sun was in Libra, and then, as if on the wings of a spirit, glided out again? An indescribable longing, filled with love and sadness, has often struggled within me to find an answer. Always, in my troubles and loneliness, has my imagination turned, full of yearning (sehnsuchtsvoll), to that unknown Father, who may be far away or nearby, either way unseen, who might have taken me into his fatherly embrace, shielding me from many sorrows. Oh beloved Father, do you still, only separated from me by thin, permeable curtains of earthly Space, move among the crowd of the living? Or are you hidden behind those far thicker curtains of Eternal Night, or perhaps of Eternal Day, that my mortal eyes and outstretched arms cannot reach? Alas, I do not know, and I struggle in vain to find out. More than once, misled by my heart, I have mistaken this or that noble-looking stranger for you; and I approached him, wistful and full of respect; but he too had to turn me away; he too was not you.
65‘And yet, O Man born of Woman,’ cries the Autobiographer, with one of his sudden whirls, ‘wherein is my case peculiar? Hadst thou, any more than I, a Father whom thou knowest? The Andreas and Gretchen, or the Adam and Eve, who led thee into Life, and for a time suckled and pap-fed thee there, whom thou namest Father and Mother; these were, like mine, but thy nursing-father and nursing-mother: thy true Beginning and Father is in Heaven, whom with the bodily eye thou shalt never behold, but only with the spiritual.’
65 “And yet, O Man born of Woman,” the Autobiographer exclaims, with one of his sudden shifts, “what makes my situation unique? Did you, any more than I, have a Father you actually know? The Andreas and Gretchen, or the Adam and Eve, who brought you into this world and fed you for a while, whom you call Father and Mother; these were, like mine, just your nurturing father and mother: your true Beginning and Father is in Heaven, whom you will never see with your physical eyes, but only with your spiritual ones.”
‘The little green veil,’ adds he, among much similar moralising, and embroiled discoursing, ‘I yet keep; still more inseparably the Name, Diogenes Teufelsdröckh. From the veil can nothing be inferred: a piece of now quite faded Persian silk, like thousands of others. On the Name I have many times meditated and conjectured; but neither in this lay there any clue. That it was my unknown Father’s name I must hesitate to believe. To no purpose have I searched through all the Herald’s Books, in and without the German Empire, and through all manner of Subscriber-Lists (Pränumeranten), Militia-Rolls, and other Name-catalogues; extraordinary names as we have in Germany, the name Teufelsdröckh, except as appended to my own person, nowhere occurs. Again, what may the unchristian rather than Christian “Diogenes” mean? Did that reverend Basket-bearer intend, by such designation, to shadow-forth my future destiny, or his own present malign humour? Perhaps the latter, perhaps both. Thou ill-starred Parent, who like an Ostrich hadst to leave thy ill-starred offspring to be hatched into self-support by the mere sky-influences of Chance, can thy pilgrimage have been a smooth one? Beset by Misfortune thou doubtless hast been; or indeed by the worst figure of Misfortune, by Misconduct. Often have I fancied how, in thy hard life-battle, thou wert shot at, and slung at, wounded, hand-fettered, hamstrung, browbeaten and bedevilled by the Time-Spirit (Zeitgeist) in thyself and others, till the good soul first given thee was seared into grim rage; and thou hadst nothing for it but to leave in me an indignant appeal to the Future, and living speaking Protest against the Devil, as that 66same Spirit not of the Time only, but of Time itself, is well named! Which Appeal and Protest, may I now modestly add, was not perhaps quite lost in air.
‘The little green veil,’ he adds, amid a lot of similar moralizing and tangled conversation, ‘I still keep; even more inseparably the Name, Diogenes Teufelsdröckh. Nothing can be inferred from the veil: a piece of now quite faded Persian silk, like thousands of others. I've thought and speculated a lot about the Name; but there’s no clue there either. I can hardly believe that it was my unknown father's name. I've searched through all of the Herald’s Books, inside and outside the German Empire, and through all kinds of subscriber lists, militia rolls, and other name catalogues; extraordinary names we have in Germany, but the name Teufelsdröckh, aside from being attached to me, nowhere appears. Again, what could the unchristian rather than Christian ‘Diogenes’ mean? Did that esteemed basket-bearer intend, by such a title, to hint at my future fate or his own current bad mood? Maybe the latter, maybe both. You ill-fated parent, who like an ostrich had to leave your unfortunate offspring to be raised by the mere chance influences of the sky, could your journey have been an easy one? You’ve undoubtedly faced misfortune; or indeed the worst kind of misfortune, by misconduct. I often imagined how, in your tough life struggle, you were shot at and attacked, wounded, handcuffed, hamstrung, browbeaten, and tormented by the spirit of the times in yourself and others, until the good soul you were first given was turned into grim anger; and you had nothing left but to leave in me an angry plea to the future, a living protest against the Devil, as that same Spirit, not just of the times but of Time itself, is well named! I may now modestly add that this plea and protest were perhaps not entirely lost in the air.
‘For indeed, as Walter Shandy often insisted, there is much, nay almost all, in Names. The Name is the earliest Garment you wrap round the earth-visiting Me; to which it thenceforth cleaves, more tenaciously (for there are Names that have lasted nigh thirty centuries) than the very skin. And now from without, what mystic influences does it not send inwards, even to the centre; especially in those plastic first-times, when the whole soul is yet infantine, soft, and the invisible seedgrain will grow to be an all overshadowing tree! Names? Could I unfold the influence of Names, which are the most important of all Clothings, I were a second greater Trismegistus. Not only all common Speech, but Science, Poetry itself is no other, if thou consider it, than a right Naming. Adam’s first task was giving names to natural Appearances: what is ours still but a continuation of the same; be the Appearances exotic-vegetable, organic, mechanic, stars or starry movements (as in Science); or (as in Poetry) passions, virtues, calamities, God-attributes, Gods?—In a very plain sense the Proverb says, Call one a thief, and he will steal; in an almost similar sense may we not perhaps say, Call one Diogenes Teufelsdröckh, and he will open the Philosophy of Clothes?’
‘For sure, as Walter Shandy often said, there’s a lot—almost everything—in Names. The Name is the first layer you wrap around the earth-traveling Me; it sticks to you more firmly (some Names have lasted nearly thirty centuries) than your very skin. And from the outside, what mysterious influences doesn’t it send inward, all the way to the core? Especially in those formative early moments, when the whole soul is still young, soft, and the invisible seed will grow into a massive tree! Names? If I could explain the power of Names, which are the most significant of all coverings, I would be a second greater Trismegistus. Not only is all everyday Speech, but also Science and Poetry, nothing more—if you think about it—than a proper Naming. Adam’s first job was naming natural things: what we do is just a continuation of that; whether the things are exotic plants, living beings, machines, stars or their movements (as in Science); or (as in Poetry) feelings, virtues, disasters, divine qualities, or Gods?—In a very straightforward way, the Proverb says, Call one a thief, and he will steal; in a similar vein, can we not say, Call one Diogenes Teufelsdröckh, and he will uncover the Philosophy of Clothes?’
‘Meanwhile the incipient Diogenes, like others, all ignorant of his Why, his How or Whereabout, was opening his eyes to the kind Light; sprawling-out his ten fingers and toes; listening, tasting, feeling; in a word, by all his Five Senses, still more by his Sixth Sense of Hunger, and a whole infinitude of inward, spiritual, half-awakened Senses, endeavouring daily to acquire for himself some knowledge of this strange Universe where he had arrived, be his task therein what it might. Infinite was his progress; thus in some fifteen months, he could perform the miracle of—Speech! To breed a fresh Soul, is it not like brooding a fresh (celestial) Egg; wherein as yet all is formless, powerless; yet by degrees organic elements and fibres shoot 67through the watery albumen; and out of vague Sensation grows Thought, grows Fantasy and Force, and we have Philosophies, Dynasties, nay Poetries and Religions!
‘Meanwhile, the emerging Diogenes, like many others, unaware of his Why, How, or Whereabouts, was opening his eyes to the bright Light; stretching out his ten fingers and toes; listening, tasting, feeling; in short, using all his Five Senses, and even more his Sixth Sense of Hunger, along with an endless array of internal, spiritual, half-awakened Senses, striving daily to gain some understanding of this strange Universe he had entered, whatever his role might be. His progress was limitless; thus, in about fifteen months, he could achieve the miracle of—Speech! To develop a new Soul is like nurturing a fresh (celestial) Egg; where everything is still formless, powerless; yet gradually, organic elements and fibers emerge through the watery substance; and from vague Sensation comes Thought, comes Fantasy and Force, giving rise to Philosophies, Dynasties, and even Poetries and Religions!
‘Young Diogenes, or rather young Gneschen, for by such diminutive had they in their fondness named him, travelled forward to those high consummations, by quick yet easy stages. The Futterals, to avoid vain talk, and moreover keep the roll of gold Friedrichs safe, gave-out that he was a grand-nephew; the orphan of some sister’s daughter, suddenly deceased, in Andreas’s distant Prussian birthland; of whom, as of her indigent sorrowing widower, little enough was known at Entepfuhl. Heedless of all which, the Nurseling took to his spoon-meat, and throve. I have heard him noted as a still infant, that kept his mind much to himself; above all, that seldom or never cried. He already felt that time was precious; that he had other work cut-out for him than whimpering.’
‘Young Diogenes, or rather young Gneschen, since that was the affectionate nickname they gave him, traveled forward towards great achievements, taking quick yet easy steps. The Futterals, to avoid unnecessary chatter and to keep the roll of gold Friedrichs safe, claimed he was a grand-nephew; the orphan of a deceased sister’s daughter from Andreas’s distant Prussian homeland, about whom, along with her unfortunate widower, not much was known in Entepfuhl. Ignoring all of this, the Nurseling focused on his spoon-meat and thrived. I’ve heard it said that even as an infant, he kept his thoughts to himself; in particular, he rarely if ever cried. He already understood that time was valuable and that he had more important things to do than whimper.’
Such, after utmost painful search and collation among these miscellaneous Paper-masses, is all the notice we can gather of Herr Teufelsdröckh’s genealogy. More imperfect, more enigmatic it can seem to few readers than to us. The Professor, in whom truly we more and more discern a certain satirical turn, and deep undercurrents of roguish whim, for the present stands pledged in honour, so we will not doubt him: but seems it not conceivable that, by the ‘good Gretchen Futteral,’ or some other perhaps interested party, he has himself been deceived? Should these sheets, translated or not, ever reach the Entepfuhl Circulating Library, some cultivated native of that district might feel called to afford explanation. Nay, since Books, like invisible scouts, permeate the whole habitable globe, and Timbuctoo itself is not safe from British Literature, may not some Copy find out even the mysterious basket-bearing Stranger, who in a state of extreme senility perhaps still exists; and gently force even him to disclose himself; to claim openly a son, in whom any father may feel pride?
After a thorough and painful search through these random piles of papers, this is all we can find about Herr Teufelsdröckh’s family background. It might seem even more incomplete and puzzling to a few readers than it does to us. The Professor, who increasingly reveals a certain satirical edge and deep hints of playful mischief, is currently upholding his word, so we won’t doubt him. But isn’t it possible that, through ‘good Gretchen Futteral’ or some other interested party, he has been misled himself? If these pages, whether translated or not, ever make it to the Entepfuhl Circulating Library, a cultured person from that area might feel compelled to provide some clarity. Furthermore, since books, like unseen scouts, spread across the entire world and even Timbuktu isn’t safe from British literature, could it be that a copy might reach the mysterious stranger with the basket, who might still exist in a state of extreme old age; and gently encourage him to reveal himself and proudly claim a son any father would be proud of?
CHAPTER II
CHAPTER 2
IDYLLIC
‘Happy season of Childhood!’ exclaims Teufelsdröckh: ‘Kind Nature, that art to all a bountiful mother; that visitest the poor man’s hut with auroral radiance; and for thy Nurseling hast provided, a soft swathing of Love, and infinite Hope, wherein he waxes and slumbers, danced-round (umgaukelt) by sweetest Dreams! If the paternal Cottage still shuts us in, its roof still screens us; with a Father we have as yet a prophet, priest and king, and an Obedience that makes us free. The young spirit has awakened out of Eternity, and knows not what we mean by Time; as yet Time is no fast-hurrying stream, but a sportful sunlit ocean; years to the child are as ages: ah! the secret of Vicissitude, of that slower or quicker decay and ceaseless down-rushing of the universal World-fabric, from the granite mountain to the man or day-moth, is yet unknown; and in a motionless Universe, we taste, what afterwards in this quick-whirling Universe is forever denied us, the balm of Rest. Sleep on, thou fair Child, for thy long rough journey is at hand! A little while, and thou too shalt sleep no more, but thy very dreams shall be mimic battles; thou too, with old Arnauld, wilt have to say in stern patience: “Rest? Rest? Shall I not have all Eternity to rest in?” Celestial Nepenthe! though a Pyrrhus conquer empires, and an Alexander sack the world, he finds thee not; and thou hast once fallen gently, of thy own accord, on the eyelids, on the heart of every mother’s child. For as yet, sleep and waking are one: the fair Life-garden rustles infinite around, and everywhere is dewy fragrance, and the budding of Hope; which budding, if in youth, too frostnipt, it grow to flowers, will in manhood yield no fruit, but a prickly, bitter-rinded stone-fruit, of which the fewest can find the kernel.’
‘Happy season of Childhood!’ exclaims Teufelsdröckh: ‘Kind Nature, that is a generous mother to all; that visits the poor man’s home with a fresh light; and for your young one has provided a comforting blanket of Love and endless Hope, in which he grows and sleeps, surrounded by the sweetest Dreams! If the family Cottage still holds us close, its roof still protects us; with a Father we still have a guide, a protector, and a leader, along with an Obedience that grants us freedom. The young spirit has awakened from Eternity and doesn’t understand what we mean by Time; for now, Time is not a rushing stream but a playful sunlit ocean; years to a child feel like ages: ah! the secret of Change, of that slower or faster decay and the never-ending collapse of the universe, from the granite mountains to the smallest creature, is still unknown; and in a still Universe, we experience what later in this fast-moving Universe will be forever denied to us, the comfort of Rest. Sleep on, dear Child, for your long, rough journey is about to begin! Soon, you too will sleep no more, but your very dreams will become mock battles; you too, like old Arnauld, will have to say with stern patience: “Rest? Rest? Won't I have all Eternity to rest?” Heavenly Nepenthe! even if a Pyrrhus conquers empires and an Alexander destroys the world, he cannot find you; yet, you have once gently fallen, of your own will, upon the eyelids and hearts of every mother’s child. For now, sleep and waking are the same: the beautiful Life-garden sways endlessly around, and everywhere is a fresh fragrance and the blossoming of Hope; which, if during youth, it is too affected by frost, will grow into flowers, but in adulthood will yield no fruit, only a prickly, bitter stone-fruit, of which only a few can find the kernel.’
In such rose-coloured light does our Professor, as Poets are wont, look back on his childhood; the historical details of which (to say nothing of much other 69vague oratorical matter) he accordingly dwells on with an almost wearisome minuteness. We hear of Entepfuhl standing ‘in trustful derangement’ among the woody slopes; the paternal Orchard flanking it as extreme out-post from below; the little Kuhbach gushing kindly by, among beech-rows, through river after river, into the Donau, into the Black Sea, into the Atmosphere and Universe; and how ‘the brave old Linden,’ stretching like a parasol of twenty ells in radius, overtopping all other rows and clumps, towered-up from the central Agora and Campus Martius of the Village, like its Sacred Tree; and how the old men sat talking under its shadow (Gneschen often greedily listening), and the wearied labourers reclined, and the unwearied children sported, and the young men and maidens often danced to flute-music. ‘Glorious summer twilights,’ cries Teufelsdröckh, ‘when the Sun, like a proud Conqueror and Imperial Taskmaster, turned his back, with his gold-purple emblazonry, and all his fireclad body-guard (of Prismatic Colours); and the tired brickmakers of this clay Earth might steal a little frolic, and those few meek Stars would not tell of them!’
In such a rosy light does our Professor, like poets often do, reflect on his childhood; the historical details of which (not to mention a lot of other vague storytelling) he goes into with almost exhausting detail. We hear about Entepfuhl situated ‘in trusting chaos’ among the wooded slopes, the family Orchard acting as the farthest point down below; the little Kuhbach flowing kindly by, through rows of beeches, into river after river, eventually reaching the Danube, the Black Sea, the atmosphere, and the universe; and how ‘the brave old Linden,’ stretching like a parasol twenty yards across, towering above all other trees and bushes, rose up from the central Agora and Campus Martius of the village, like its Sacred Tree; and how the old men sat chatting in its shade (Gneschen often eagerly listening), while tired workers leaned back, and energetic children played, and young men and women often danced to flute music. ‘Glorious summer evenings,’ exclaims Teufelsdröckh, ‘when the Sun, like a proud conqueror and imperial taskmaster, turned his back, with his gold-purple colors shining bright, and all his fiery escort (of prismatic hues); and the weary brickmakers of this clay Earth could sneak a little fun, and those few humble Stars wouldn’t spill the beans on them!’
Then we have long details of the Weinlesen (Vintage), the Harvest-Home, Christmas, and so forth; with a whole cycle of the Entepfuhl Children’s-games, differing apparently by mere superficial shades from those of other countries. Concerning all which, we shall here, for obvious reasons, say nothing. What cares the world for our as yet miniature Philosopher’s achievements under that ‘brave old Linden’? Or even where is the use of such practical reflections as the following? ‘In all the sports of Children, were it only in their wanton breakages and defacements, you shall discern a creative instinct (schaffenden Trieb): the Mankin feels that he is a born Man, that his vocation is to work. The choicest present you can make him is a Tool; be it knife or pen-gun, for construction or for destruction; either way it is for Work, for Change. In gregarious sports of skill or strength, the Boy trains himself to Coöperation, for war or peace, as governor or governed: the little Maid again, provident of her domestic destiny, takes with preference to Dolls.’
Then we have detailed accounts of the Weinlesen (Vintage), the Harvest Home, Christmas, and more; along with a whole series of the Entepfuhl Children’s games, which seem to differ only slightly from those in other countries. Regarding all this, we won’t say anything here for obvious reasons. What does the world care about our miniature Philosopher’s accomplishments beneath that ‘brave old Linden’? Or what's the point of such practical reflections as the following? ‘In all children’s games, even in their reckless breakages and defacements, you can see a creative instinct (schaffenden Trieb): the little one feels that he is a born human, that his purpose is to work. The best gift you can give him is a Tool; be it a knife or a pen gun, for building or for destroying; either way, it's for Work, for Change. In social games requiring skill or strength, the boy learns Cooperation, for war or peace, as a leader or a follower: meanwhile, the little girl, mindful of her future home life, opts for Dolls.’
70Perhaps, however, we may give this anecdote, considering who it is that relates it: ‘My first short-clothes were of yellow serge; or rather, I should say, my first short-cloth, for the vesture was one and indivisible, reaching from neck to ankle, a mere body with four limbs: of which fashion how little could I then divine the architectural, how much less the moral significance!’
70Maybe we should share this story, given who’s telling it: ‘My first pair of short pants was made of yellow fabric; or rather, I should say, my first short garment, since it was one piece, extending from neck to ankle, just a body with four limbs: back then, I had no idea about the design, and even less about the moral meaning!’
More graceful is the following little picture: ‘On fine evenings I was wont to carry-forth my supper (bread-crumb boiled in milk), and eat it out-of-doors. On the coping of the Orchard-wall, which I could reach by climbing, or still more easily if Father Andreas would set-up the pruning-ladder, my porringer was placed: there, many a sunset, have I, looking at the distant western Mountains, consumed, not without relish, my evening meal. Those hues of gold and azure, that hush of World’s expectation as Day died, were still a Hebrew Speech for me; nevertheless I was looking at the fair illuminated Letters, and had an eye for their gilding.’
Here’s a more modern version of the paragraph: More gracefully, here's a little scene: ‘On nice evenings, I used to take my dinner (bread soaked in milk) outside to eat. I would sit on the edge of the orchard wall, which I could reach by climbing, or even more easily if Father Andreas set up the pruning ladder. There, many evenings at sunset, while gazing at the distant western mountains, I enjoyed my meal with pleasure. Those golden and blue hues, along with the calm that comes as the day ends, still felt like a foreign language to me; yet, I was captivated by the beautifully illuminated letters and their gilded appearance.’
With ‘the little one’s friendship for cattle and poultry’ we shall not much intermeddle. It may be that hereby he acquired a ‘certain deeper sympathy with animated Nature’: but when, we would ask, saw any man, in a collection of Biographical Documents, such a piece as this: ‘Impressive enough (bedeutungsvoll) was it to hear, in early morning, the Swineherd’s horn; and know that so many hungry happy quadrupeds were, on all sides, starting in hot haste to join him, for breakfast on the Heath. Or to see them at eventide, all marching-in again, with short squeak, almost in military order; and each, topographically correct, trotting-off in succession to the right or left, through its own lane, to its own dwelling; till old Kunz, at the Village-head, now left alone, blew his last blast, and retired for the night. We are wont to love the Hog chiefly in the form of Ham; yet did not these bristly thick-skinned beings here manifest intelligence, perhaps humour of character; at any rate, a touching, trustful submissiveness to Man,—who, were he but a Swineherd, in darned gabardine, and leather breeches 71more resembling slate or discoloured-tin breeches, is still the Hierarch of this lower world?’
With the little one's friendship for cattle and poultry, we won't get too involved. Maybe he developed a deeper connection with living nature through it. But, we’d like to know, when have we seen something like this in a collection of Biographical Documents: ‘It was striking enough to listen to the Swineherd’s horn in the early morning and know that so many hungry, happy animals were hurrying to join him for breakfast on the heath. Or to see them all coming back in the evening, making short squeaks, almost in military formation, each one following its own path, heading to its home; until old Kunz, at the village head, left alone, blew his final horn and called it a night. We usually love pigs mainly when they end up as ham, yet didn’t these bristly, thick-skinned creatures show intelligence, maybe even a sense of humor? At the very least, they displayed a touching, trusting submission to man—who, even if he were just a swineherd in patched-up clothes and leather pants more similar to slate or discolored tin, is still the hierarch of this lower world?’ 71
It is maintained, by Helvetius and his set, that an infant of genius is quite the same as any other infant, only that certain surprisingly favourable influences accompany him through life, especially through childhood, and expand him, while others lie closefolded and continue dunces. Herein, say they, consists the whole difference between an inspired Prophet and a double-barrelled Game-preserver: the inner man of the one has been fostered into generous development; that of the other, crushed-down perhaps by vigour of animal digestion, and the like, has exuded and evaporated, or at best sleeps now irresuscitably stagnant at the bottom of his stomach. ‘With which opinion,’ cries Teufelsdröckh, ‘I should as soon agree as with this other, that an acorn might, by favourable or unfavourable influences of soil and climate, be nursed into a cabbage, or the cabbage-seed into an oak.
It is claimed by Helvetius and his followers that a genius baby is just like any other baby, except that certain surprisingly positive influences accompany them throughout life, especially during childhood, which help them grow, while others remain dormant and continue to be slow learners. They argue that this is the fundamental difference between an inspired Prophet and a typical Game-preserver: the inner self of the former has been nurtured into generous development; whereas the latter's has been perhaps suppressed by the strength of basic instincts and similar factors, causing it to fade away or, at best, remain stuck and dormant at the bottom of his being. "To which opinion," exclaims Teufelsdröckh, "I would agree just as readily as with the idea that an acorn could, due to the favorable or unfavorable influences of soil and climate, turn into a cabbage, or a cabbage seed into an oak."
‘Nevertheless,’ continues he, ‘I too acknowledge the all-but omnipotence of early culture and nurture: hereby we have either a doddered dwarf bush, or a high-towering, wide-shadowing tree; either a sick yellow cabbage, or an edible luxuriant green one. Of a truth, it is the duty of all men, especially of all philosophers, to note-down with accuracy the characteristic circumstances of their Education, what furthered, what hindered, what in any way modified it: to which duty, nowadays so pressing for many a German Autobiographer, I also zealously address myself.’—Thou rogue! Is it by short-clothes of yellow serge, and swineherd horns, that an infant of genius is educated? And yet, as usual, it ever remains doubtful whether he is laughing in his sleeve at these Autobiographical times of ours, or writing from the abundance of his own fond ineptitude. For he continues: ‘If among the ever-streaming currents of Sights, Hearings, Feelings for Pain or Pleasure, whereby, as in a Magic Hall, young Gneschen went about environed, I might venture to select and specify, perhaps these following were also of the number:
‘Still,’ he goes on, ‘I also recognize the almost limitless power of early culture and upbringing: we end up with either a stunted, twisted little bush or a tall, sprawling tree; either a sickly yellow cabbage or a delicious, vibrant green one. Truly, it’s the responsibility of everyone, especially philosophers, to carefully record the key circumstances of their education—what helped, what hindered, and what altered it in any way. This duty, so pressing for many German autobiographers these days, is one I also take on with enthusiasm.’—You sly one! Is it really the yellow wool trousers and pigherd horns that shape a child of genius? Yet, as always, it remains uncertain whether he is secretly mocking our current autobiographical times or writing from his own overflowing cluelessness. He continues: ‘If I could choose from the endless stream of sights, sounds, feelings of pain or pleasure that surrounded young Gneschen, perhaps the following would stand out as well:
‘Doubtless, as childish sports call forth Intellect, 72Activity, so the young creature’s Imagination was stirred up, and a Historical tendency given him by the narrative habits of Father Andreas; who, with his battle-reminiscences, and gay austere yet hearty patriarchal aspect, could not but appear another Ulysses and “much-enduring Man.” Eagerly I hung upon his tales, when listening neighbours enlivened the hearth; from these perils and these travels, wild and far almost as Hades itself, a dim world of Adventure expanded itself within me. Incalculable also was the knowledge I acquired in standing by the Old Men under the Linden-tree: the whole of Immensity was yet new to me; and had not these reverend seniors, talkative enough, been employed in partial surveys thereof for nigh fourscore years? With amazement I began to discover that Entepfuhl stood in the middle of a Country, of a World; that there was such a thing as History, as Biography; to which I also, one day, by hand and tongue, might contribute.
‘Of course, just as childish games bring out our intellect, 72activity, the young creature’s imagination was ignited, and a sense of history was inspired in him by the storytelling ways of Father Andreas; who, with his memories of battles, and his cheerful yet stern patriarchal presence, could easily seem like another Ulysses, a “man of endurance.” I eagerly leaned in as he shared his stories, while nearby listeners added warmth to the gathering; from these dangers and adventures, wild and distant as Hades itself, a vague world of adventure opened up within me. The knowledge I gained while standing with the Old Men under the Linden tree was immeasurable: the entire expanse of the universe was still new to me; and hadn’t these respected elders, chatty enough, been engaged in partial discoveries of it for nearly eighty years? I was amazed to realize that Entepfuhl was at the center of a country, a world; that there was such a thing as history, as biography; to which I, one day, might also contribute with my hands and words.
‘In a like sense worked the Postwagen (Stage-coach), which, slow-rolling under its mountains of men and luggage, wended through our Village: northwards, truly, in the dead of night; yet southwards visibly at eventide. Not till my eighth year did I reflect that this Postwagen could be other than some terrestrial Moon, rising and setting by mere Law of Nature, like the heavenly one; that it came on made highways, from far cities towards far cities; weaving them like a monstrous shuttle into closer and closer union. It was then that, independently of Schiller’s Wilhelm Tell, I made this not quite insignificant reflection (so true also in spiritual things): Any road, this simple Entepfuhl road, will lead you to the end of the world!
‘In a similar way, the Postwagen (Stage-coach) slowly rolled through our Village, loaded down with people and luggage. It traveled northward in the dead of night and southward visibly at dusk. It wasn’t until I was eight years old that it occurred to me that this Postwagen could be anything other than a kind of earthly Moon, rising and setting according to the laws of nature, much like the heavenly one; that it traveled along well-paved roads from distant cities to other distant cities, weaving them together like a giant shuttle into tighter and tighter connections. It was then that, independently of Schiller’s Wilhelm Tell, I made this rather significant observation (which is also true in spiritual matters): Any road, even this simple Entepfuhl road, will take you to the end of the world!’
‘Why mention our Swallows, which, out of far Africa, as I learned, threading their way over seas and mountains, corporate cities and belligerent nations, yearly found themselves, with the month of May, snug-lodged in our Cottage Lobby? The hospitable Father (for cleanliness’ sake) had fixed a little bracket plumb under their nest: there they built, and caught flies, and twittered, and bred; and all, I chiefly, from the heart loved them. Bright, nimble creatures, who taught you the mason-craft; nay, stranger still, gave you a masonic 73incorporation, almost social police? For if, by ill chance, and when time pressed, your House fell, have I not seen five neighbourly Helpers appear next day; and swashing to and fro, with animated, loud, long-drawn chirpings, and activity almost super-hirundine, complete it again before nightfall?
‘Why mention our Swallows, which, from far Africa, as I learned, flying over seas and mountains, busy cities, and conflicting nations, every year found themselves, with the month of May, cozy in our Cottage Lobby? The welcoming Father (for the sake of cleanliness) had put up a little bracket right under their nest: there they built, caught flies, chirped, and bred; and I, mostly, from the heart loved them. Bright, quick creatures, who taught you the art of building; and even stranger, gave you a masonic 73connection, almost like social duty? Because if, by bad luck, and when time was short, your House fell, have I not seen five friendly Helpers show up the next day; and flitting back and forth, with lively, loud, extended chirping, and energy almost beyond belief, fix it again before night?
‘But undoubtedly the grand summary of Entepfuhl child’s-culture, where as in a funnel its manifold influences were concentrated and simultaneously poured-down on us, was the annual Cattle-fair. Here, assembling from all the four winds, came the elements of an unspeakable hurly-burly. Nutbrown maids and nutbrown men, all clear-washed, loud-laughing, bedizened and beribanded; who came for dancing, for treating, and if possible, for happiness. Topbooted Graziers from the North; Swiss Brokers, Italian Drovers, also topbooted, from the South; these with their subalterns in leather jerkins, leather skull-caps, and long oxgoads; shouting in half-articulate speech, amid the inarticulate barking and bellowing. Apart stood Potters from far Saxony, with their crockery in fair rows; Nürnberg Pedlars, in booths that to me seemed richer than Ormuz bazaars; Showmen from the Lago Maggiore; detachments of the Wiener Schub (Offscourings of Vienna) vociferously superintending games of chance. Ballad-singers brayed, Auctioneers grew hoarse; cheap New Wine (heuriger) flowed like water, still worse confounding the confusion; and high over all, vaulted, in ground-and-lofty tumbling, a particoloured Merry-Andrew, like the genius of the place and of Life itself.
‘But without a doubt, the main highlight of Entepfuhl's child culture, where all its various influences funneled together and were simultaneously poured down on us, was the annual Cattle Fair. Here, gathering from every direction, came a chaotic mix of people. Dark-haired girls and boys, all dressed up, laughing loudly, adorned with ribbons; who came for dancing, for treating, and, if possible, for happiness. There were top-booted farmers from the North; Swiss brokers, Italian drovers, also in top boots, from the South; along with their assistants in leather jackets, leather caps, and long oxgoads; shouting in broken speech, amidst the noisy barking and bellowing. Standing apart were potters from far-off Saxony, displaying their pottery in neat rows; Nürnberg peddlers, in stalls that seemed richer than the markets of Ormuz; showmen from Lago Maggiore; groups from the Wiener Schub (the dregs of Vienna) loudly overseeing games of chance. Ballad singers sang out, auctioneers grew hoarse; cheap new wine (heuriger) flowed like water, adding to the chaos; and high above all, tumbling and vaulting, a colorful jester, like the spirit of the place and of life itself.
‘Thus encircled by the mystery of Existence; under the deep heavenly Firmament; waited-on by the four golden Seasons, with their vicissitudes of contribution, for even grim Winter brought its skating-matches and shooting-matches, its snow-storms and Christmas-carols,—did the Child sit and learn. These things were the Alphabet, whereby in aftertime he was to syllable and partly read the grand Volume of the World; what matters it whether such Alphabet be in large gilt letters or in small ungilt ones, so you have an eye to read it? For Gneschen, eager to learn, the very act of looking thereon was a blessedness that gilded all: his existence was a bright, soft element of Joy; out of which, as in 74Prospero’s Island, wonder after wonder bodied itself forth, to teach by charming.
‘Surrounded by the mystery of existence; under the vast heavenly sky; attended by the four golden seasons, with their ups and downs, even grim winter brought its ice skating and shooting matches, its snowstorms and Christmas carols,—the Child sat and learned. These things were the alphabet, through which later he would spell out and partially read the grand book of the world; what does it matter if that alphabet is in large gilded letters or in small unadorned ones, as long as you have the eye to read it? For Gneschen, eager to learn, the very act of looking at it was a blessing that made everything shine; his existence was a bright, gentle element of joy; from which, like on Prospero’s Island, wonder after wonder took shape to teach through enchantment.
‘Nevertheless, I were but a vain dreamer to say, that even then my felicity was perfect. I had, once for all, come down from Heaven into the Earth. Among the rainbow colours that glowed on my horizon, lay even in childhood a dark ring of Care, as yet no thicker than a thread, and often quite overshone; yet always it reappeared, nay ever waxing broader and broader; till in after-years it almost over-shadowed my whole canopy, and threatened to engulf me in final night. It was the ring of Necessity whereby we are all begirt; happy he for whom a kind heavenly Sun brightens it into a ring of Duty, and plays round it with beautiful prismatic diffractions; yet ever, as basis and as bourne for our whole being, it is there.
‘Still, I would be a foolish dreamer to claim that my happiness was complete even then. I had, once and for all, descended from Heaven to Earth. Among the vibrant colors that brightened my horizon, even in childhood there was a dark ring of Worry, thin as a thread, often overshadowed; yet it always came back, growing wider and wider until, in later years, it almost covered my entire sky and threatened to pull me into darkness. It was the ring of Necessity that surrounds us all; blessed is the one for whom a kind celestial Sun turns it into a ring of Duty, decorating it with beautiful rainbow-like effects; yet, as the foundation and destination of our entire existence, it remains ever present.
‘For the first few years of our terrestrial Apprenticeship, we have not much work to do; but, boarded and lodged gratis, are set down mostly to look about us over the workshop, and see others work, till we have understood the tools a little, and can handle this and that. If good Passivity alone, and not good Passivity and good Activity together, were the thing wanted, then was my early position favourable beyond the most. In all that respects openness of Sense, affectionate Temper, ingenuous Curiosity, and the fostering of these, what more could I have wished? On the other side, however, things went not so well. My Active Power (Thatkraft) was unfavourably hemmed-in; of which misfortune how many traces yet abide with me! In an orderly house, where the litter of children’s sports is hateful enough, your training is too stoical; rather to bear and forbear than to make and do. I was forbid much: wishes in any measure bold I had to renounce; everywhere a strait bond of Obedience inflexibly held me down. Thus already Freewill often came in painful collision with Necessity; so that my tears flowed, and at seasons the Child itself might taste that root of bitterness, wherewith the whole fruitage of our life is mingled and tempered.
For the first few years of our time on Earth, we didn’t have much work to do; instead, we were provided with free room and board and mostly just observed the workshop, watching others work until we understood the tools a bit and could manage a few things ourselves. If only good Passivity were enough, without the need for good Activity as well, then my early situation would have been more favorable than most. In terms of being open to experience, having a loving temperament, genuine curiosity, and nurturing these qualities, what more could I have wanted? However, on the flip side, things weren’t so great. My Active Power (Thatkraft) was restricted in an unhelpful way, and I still carry many traces of that misfortune with me! In an orderly home, where the mess from children’s play is quite disliked, the training was too strict; it encouraged me to endure rather than to create and do. I was forbidden from many things: I had to give up wishes that could be seen as bold; a tight bond of obedience held me down at every turn. As a result, my free will often clashed painfully with necessity, causing me to cry, and at times, the child within me could feel that bitter reality that flavors and tempers the entirety of our lives.
‘In which habituation to Obedience, truly, it was 75beyond measure safer to err by excess than by defect. Obedience is our universal duty and destiny; wherein whoso will not bend must break: too early and too thoroughly we cannot be trained to know that Would, in this world of ours, is as mere zero to Should, and for most part as the smallest of fractions even to Shall. Hereby was laid for me the basis of worldly Discretion, nay, of Morality itself. Let me not quarrel with my upbringing! It was rigorous, too frugal, compressively secluded, everyway unscientific: yet in that very strictness and domestic solitude might there not lie the root of deeper earnestness, of the stem from which all noble fruit must grow? Above all, how unskilful soever, it was loving, it was well-meant, honest; whereby every deficiency was helped. My kind Mother, for as such I must ever love the good Gretchen, did me one altogether invaluable service: she taught me, less indeed by word than by act and daily reverent look and habitude, her own simple version of the Christian Faith. Andreas too attended Church; yet more like a parade-duty, for which he in the other world expected pay with arrears,—as, I trust, he has received; but my Mother, with a true woman’s heart, and fine though uncultivated sense, was in the strictest acceptation Religious. How indestructibly the Good grows, and propagates itself, even among the weedy entanglements of Evil! The highest whom I knew on Earth I here saw bowed down, with awe unspeakable, before a Higher in Heaven: such things, especially in infancy, reach inwards to the very core of your being; mysteriously does a Holy of Holies build itself into visibility in the mysterious deeps; and Reverence, the divinest in man, springs forth undying from its mean envelopment of Fear. Wouldst thou rather be a peasant’s son that knew, were it never so rudely, there was a God in Heaven and in Man; or a duke’s son that only knew there were two-and-thirty quarters on the family-coach?’
‘In terms of getting used to obedience, it was far safer to err on the side of too much than too little. Obedience is our universal duty and destiny; those who refuse to adapt must inevitably break. We can’t be trained too early or too thoroughly to realize that what we want in this world is nothing compared to what we should do, and is often just a fraction of what we must do. This laid the foundation for my worldly discretion, indeed, for morality itself. I won’t argue with my upbringing! It was strict, overly frugal, and isolating in many ways, not scientific at all: yet perhaps in that very strictness and domestic solitude lies the root of deeper seriousness, the source from which all noble qualities must grow. Above all, no matter how clumsy it was, it was loving, well-intentioned, and honest; thus, every shortcoming was helped. My dear Mother, for I must always love the good Gretchen, did me one invaluable service: she taught me, more through her actions and her daily respectful looks and habits than through words, her own simple understanding of the Christian faith. Andreas also went to church; yet more as a duty to parade, for which he expected rewards in the afterlife—rewards I hope he has received; but my Mother, with a true woman’s heart and an innate but unrefined sense, was strictly religious. How indestructibly good things grow and spread, even among the tangled weeds of evil! The highest person I knew on Earth I saw here humbled, with unspeakable awe, before a higher being in heaven: such experiences, especially in infancy, reach deep into your core; mysteriously, a Holy of Holies makes itself visible in the mysterious depths; and reverence, the most divine quality in humanity, springs forth undying from its humble wrapping of fear. Would you rather be the son of a peasant who knew, however crudely, that there was a God in heaven and in man, or the son of a duke who only knew there were thirty-two coats of arms on the family carriage?’
To which last question we must answer: Beware, O Teufelsdröckh, of spiritual pride!
To that last question, we must respond: Be cautious, oh Teufelsdröckh, of spiritual pride!
CHAPTER III
CHAPTER 3
PEDAGOGY
Hitherto we see young Gneschen, in his indivisible case of yellow serge, borne forward mostly on the arms of kind Nature alone; seated, indeed, and much to his mind, in the terrestrial workshop; but (except his soft hazel eyes, which we doubt not already gleamed with a still intelligence) called upon for little voluntary movement there. Hitherto, accordingly, his aspect is rather generic, that of an incipient Philosopher and Poet in the abstract; perhaps it would trouble Herr Heuschrecke himself to say wherein the special Doctrine of Clothes is as yet foreshadowed or betokened. For with Gneschen, as with others, the Man may indeed stand pictured in the Boy (at least all the pigments are there); yet only some half of the Man stands in the Child, or young Boy, namely, his Passive endowment, not his Active. The more impatient are we to discover what figure he cuts in this latter capacity; how when, to use his own words, ‘he understands the tools a little, and can handle this or that,’ he will proceed to handle it.
So far, so good. we see young Gneschen, in his matching yellow outfit, mostly carried forward by the hands of kind Nature alone; seated, indeed, and quite content, in the earthly workshop; but (except for his gentle hazel eyes, which we’re sure already sparkled with a deeper intelligence) he is called upon for little voluntary movement there. Up to this point, therefore, his appearance is quite generic, that of a budding Philosopher and Poet in the abstract; perhaps it would challenge Herr Heuschrecke himself to pinpoint how the specific Doctrine of Clothes is hinted at or suggested. For with Gneschen, as with others, the Man can indeed be seen in the Boy (at least all the colors are there); yet only part of the Man exists in the Child, or young Boy, namely, his Passive qualities, not his Active ones. We are increasingly eager to discover what role he plays in this latter capacity; how when, to use his own words, ‘he understands the tools a little, and can handle this or that,’ he will go about using them.
Here, however, may be the place to state that, in much of our Philosopher’s history, there is something of an almost Hindoo character: nay perhaps in that so well-fostered and everyway excellent ‘Passivity’ of his, which, with no free development of the antagonist Activity, distinguished his childhood, we may detect the rudiments of much that, in after days, and still in these present days, astonishes the world. For the shallow-sighted, Teufelsdröckh is oftenest a man without Activity of any kind, a No-man; for the deep-sighted, again, a man with Activity almost superabundant, yet so spiritual, close-hidden, enigmatic, that no mortal can foresee its explosions, or even when it has exploded, so much as ascertain its significance. A dangerous, difficult temper for the modern European; above all, disadvantageous in the hero of a Biography! Now as heretofore it will behove the Editor of these pages, were it never so unsuccessfully, to do his endeavour.
Here, however, might be the right place to mention that, throughout much of our Philosopher’s history, there’s something almost Hindu about it: indeed, perhaps in that well-nurtured and all-around excellent ‘Passivity’ of his, which, without any free development of the opposing Activity, marked his childhood, we can see the beginnings of much that, in later years and even today, astonishes the world. To those with a shallow view, Teufelsdröckh often seems like a man without any Activity at all, a No-man; while to those with a deeper perspective, he appears as a man with almost overwhelming Activity, yet so spiritual, hidden, and enigmatic that no one can predict its outbursts, or even once it has occurred, truly grasp its meaning. A dangerous, complex temperament for the modern European; especially troublesome for the subject of a Biography! Now, as in the past, it will be the job of the Editor of these pages, no matter how unsuccessful it may be, to do his best.
77Among the earliest tools of any complicacy which a man, especially a man of letters, gets to handle, are his Class-books. On this portion of his History, Teufelsdröckh looks down professedly as indifferent. Reading he ‘cannot remember ever to have learned’; so perhaps had it by nature. He says generally: ‘Of the insignificant portion of my Education, which depended on Schools, there need almost no notice be taken. I learned what others learn; and kept it stored-by in a corner of my head, seeing as yet no manner of use in it. My Schoolmaster, a downbent, brokenhearted, underfoot martyr, as others of that guild are, did little for me, except discover that he could do little: he, good soul, pronounced me a genius, fit for the learned professions; and that I must be sent to the Gymnasium, and one day to the University. Meanwhile, what printed thing soever I could meet with I read. My very copper pocket-money I laid-out on stall-literature; which, as it accumulated, I with my own hands sewed into volumes. By this means was the young head furnished with a considerable miscellany of things and shadows of things: History in authentic fragments lay mingled with Fabulous chimeras, wherein also was reality; and the whole not as dead stuff, but as living pabulum, tolerably nutritive for a mind as yet so peptic.’
77Among the earliest complex tools that a person, especially someone well-read, gets to use are his textbooks. In this part of his story, Teufelsdröckh appears to look down on it with indifference. He states that he "can’t remember ever learning" to read; perhaps he had that ability naturally. He generally says, "Of the small part of my education that depended on schools, hardly any attention needs to be paid. I learned what others learn and stored it away in a corner of my mind, seeing no use for it at the time. My schoolmaster, a sad, defeated, weary martyr like many in that profession, did little for me except show that he couldn't do much. He, good man, called me a genius, destined for the learned professions, saying I should go to the Gymnasium and eventually to the University. In the meantime, I read anything I could get my hands on. I spent my pocket money on cheap books, which I later sewed together into volumes myself. Through this, my young mind was filled with a mix of real and imagined things: history in authentic fragments mixed with fantastic stories, where reality also existed; and all of it not as dead material, but as living nourishment, fairly nutritious for a mind still so eager to learn."
That the Entepfuhl Schoolmaster judged well, we now know. Indeed, already in the youthful Gneschen, with all his outward stillness, there may have been manifest an inward vivacity that promised much; symptoms of a spirit singularly open, thoughtful, almost poetical. Thus, to say nothing of his Suppers on the Orchard-wall, and other phenomena of that earlier period, have many readers of these pages stumbled, in their twelfth year, on such reflections as the following? ‘It struck me much, as I sat by the Kuhbach, one silent noontide, and watched it flowing, gurgling, to think how this same streamlet had flowed and gurgled, through all changes of weather and of fortune, from beyond the earliest date of History. Yes, probably on the morning when Joshua forded Jordan; even as at the midday when Cæsar, doubtless with difficulty, swam the Nile, yet kept his Commentaries dry,—this little 78Kuhbach, assiduous as Tiber, Eurotas or Siloa, was murmuring on across the wilderness, as yet unnamed, unseen: here, too, as in the Euphrates and the Ganges, is a vein or veinlet of the grand World-circulation of Waters, which, with its atmospheric arteries, has lasted and lasts simply with the World. Thou fool! Nature alone is antique, and the oldest art a mushroom; that idle crag thou sittest on is six-thousand years of age.’ In which little thought, as in a little fountain, may there not lie the beginning of those well-nigh unutterable meditations on the grandeur and mystery of Time, and its relation to Eternity, which play such a part in this Philosophy of Clothes?
That the Entepfuhl Schoolmaster made a good judgment, we now understand. In fact, even in the young Gneschen, despite his calm demeanor, there might have been an inner energy that indicated great potential; signs of a mind that was uniquely open, contemplative, and almost poetic. So, without mentioning his Suppers on the Orchard-wall and other moments from that earlier time, how many readers of these pages have found themselves, at the age of twelve, reflecting on thoughts like these? ‘I was struck, as I sat by the Kuhbach one silent noon, watching it flow and gurgle, thinking about how this same little stream had flowed and gurgled through all the ups and downs of weather and fate, since before history began. Yes, probably on the morning when Joshua crossed the Jordan; just like at midday when Caesar, undoubtedly struggling, swam the Nile yet kept his Commentaries dry—this little 78Kuhbach, as diligent as the Tiber, Eurotas, or Siloa, was murmuring across the desolate land that was still unnamed and unseen: here too, like in the Euphrates and the Ganges, is a tiny part of the great circulation of the World’s Waters, which, along with its atmospheric currents, has endured and continues to endure just like the World. You fool! Nature alone is ancient, and the oldest art is just a mushroom; that idle rock you’re sitting on is six thousand years old.’ In this small thought, like a little fountain, might not lie the beginning of those nearly indescribable thoughts on the grandeur and mystery of Time, and its connection to Eternal, which play such a significant role in this Philosophy of Clothes?
Over his Gymnasic and Academic years the Professor by no means lingers so lyrical and joyful as over his childhood. Green sunny tracts there are still; but intersected by bitter rivulets of tears, here and there stagnating into sour marshes of discontent. ‘With my first view of the Hinterschlag Gymnasium,’ writes he, ‘my evil days began. Well do I still remember the red sunny Whitsuntide morning, when, trotting full of hope by the side of Father Andreas, I entered the main street of the place, and saw its steeple-clock (then striking Eight) and Schuldthurm (Jail), and the aproned or disaproned Burghers moving-in to breakfast: a little dog, in mad terror, was rushing past; for some human imps had tied a tin-kettle to its tail; thus did the agonised creature, loud-jingling, career through the whole length of the Borough, and become notable enough. Fit emblem of many a Conquering Hero, to whom Fate (wedding Fantasy to Sense, as it often elsewhere does) has malignantly appended a tin-kettle of Ambition, to chase him on; which the faster he runs, urges him the faster, the more loudly and more foolishly! Fit emblem also of much that awaited myself, in that mischievous Den; as in the World, whereof it was a portion and epitome!
During his time in the Gymnasium and his academic years, the Professor certainly doesn’t reflect on those experiences with as much joy and lyricism as he does about his childhood. There are still some green, sunny spots, but they’re mixed with bitter streams of tears, occasionally settling into stagnant marshes of discontent. "With my first view of the Hinterschlag Gymnasium," he writes, "my troubled days started. I still remember that bright, sunny Whitsun morning when, full of hope, I walked alongside Father Andreas, entering the main street of the town, seeing the clock tower (then striking Eight) and the Schuldthurm (Jail), with the townsfolk, some in aprons and some not, heading in for breakfast. A little dog, in a panic, dashed past me because some kids had tied a tin kettle to its tail; the poor creature, jingling loudly, sprinted down the entire length of the town and became quite the sight. A fitting symbol of many a conquering hero, to whom Fate (blending dreams with reality, as it often does) has maliciously attached a tin kettle of ambition, urging him on; the faster he runs, the harder he is pushed, making a louder and more ridiculous noise! It also serves as a fitting emblem of much of what lay in store for me in that tricky place, just like in the world, which it mirrored and summarized!"
‘Alas, the kind beech-rows of Entepfuhl were hidden in the distance: I was among strangers, harshly, at best indifferently, disposed towards me; the young heart felt, for the first time, quite orphaned and alone.’ His schoolfellows, as is usual, persecuted him: ‘They were 79Boys,’ he says, ‘mostly rude Boys, and obeyed the impulse of rude Nature, which bids the deerherd fall upon any stricken hart, the duck-flock put to death any broken-winged brother or sister, and on all hands the strong tyrannise over the weak.’ He admits, that though ‘perhaps in an unusual degree morally courageous,’ he succeeded ill in battle, and would fain have avoided it; a result, as would appear, owing less to his small personal stature (for in passionate seasons he was ‘incredibly nimble’), than to his ‘virtuous principles’: ‘if it was disgraceful to be beaten,’ says he, ‘it was only a shade less disgraceful to have so much as fought; thus was I drawn two ways at once, and in this important element of school-history, the war-element, had little but sorrow.’ On the whole, that same excellent ‘Passivity,’ so notable in Teufelsdröckh’s childhood, is here visibly enough again getting nourishment. ‘He wept often; indeed to such a degree that he was nicknamed Der Weinende (the Tearful), which epithet, till towards his thirteenth year, was indeed not quite unmerited. Only at rare intervals did the young soul burst-forth into fire-eyed rage, and, with a stormfulness (Ungestüm) under which the boldest quailed, assert that he too had Rights of Man, or at least of Mankin.’ In all which, who does not discern a fine flower-tree and cinnamon-tree (of genius) nigh choked among pumpkins, reed-grass and ignoble shrubs; and forced if it would live, to struggle upwards only, and not outwards; into a height quite sickly, and disproportioned to its breadth?
‘Unfortunately, the lovely beech trees of Entepfuhl were far away: I was surrounded by strangers who were, at best, indifferent to me; the young heart felt, for the first time, completely orphaned and alone.’ His classmates, as is often the case, bullied him: ‘They were mostly rude boys and followed the instincts of their rough nature, which drives a herd of deer to attack any injured stag, a flock of ducks to kill any sibling with a broken wing, and everywhere the strong to dominate the weak.’ He admits that although he was ‘perhaps unusually morally courageous,’ he didn't fare well in fights and would have preferred to avoid them; a result that seemed to arise less from his small stature (for in passionate moments he was ‘incredibly quick’) but more from his ‘virtuous principles’: ‘if it was shameful to be beaten,’ he says, ‘it was only a little less shameful to have fought at all; thus, I was pulled in two directions at once, and in this crucial part of school life, the conflict element, I experienced little but sorrow.’ Overall, that same admirable ‘Passivity’ that was evident in Teufelsdröckh’s childhood is clearly being nourished again here. ‘He often cried; in fact, to such an extent that he earned the nickname Der Weinende (the Tearful), a title that, until about his thirteenth year, was not entirely undeserved. Only on rare occasions did the young soul erupt into fiery rage, and with a force that made even the bravest back down, assert that he too had rights as a person, or at least as a little person.’ In all this, who does not see a beautiful flowering tree and cinnamon tree (of genius) nearly suffocated among pumpkins, reeds, and unworthy shrubs; forced, if it wished to survive, to struggle only upwards, rather than outwards; into a height that was quite sickly, and disproportionate to its breadth?
We find, moreover, that his Greek and Latin were ‘mechanically’ taught; Hebrew scarce even mechanically; much else which they called History, Cosmography, Philosophy, and so forth, no better than not at all. So that, except inasmuch as Nature was still busy; and he himself ‘went about, as was of old his wont, among the Craftsmen’s workshops, there learning many things’; and farther lighted on some small store of curious reading, in Hans Wachtel the Cooper’s house, where he lodged,—his time, it would appear, was utterly wasted. Which facts the Professor has not yet learned to look upon with any contentment. Indeed, throughout 80the whole of this Bag Scorpio, where we now are, and often in the following Bag, he shows himself unusually animated on the matter of Education, and not without some touch of what we might presume to be anger.
We also find that his Greek and Latin were taught in a very basic way; Hebrew was barely taught at all; and much of what they called History, Cosmography, Philosophy, and so on, was no better than nothing. So, aside from the fact that Nature was still at work; and he himself ‘went around, as he used to do, among the Craftsmen’s workshops, learning many things’; and also came across some interesting books in Hans Wachtel the Cooper’s house, where he was staying,—it seems his time was completely wasted. The Professor has yet to come to terms with these facts. In fact, throughout 80this whole Bag Scorpio, where we are now, and often in the next Bag as well, he seems particularly passionate about Education, not without a hint of what we might call anger.
‘My Teachers,’ says he, ‘were hide-bound Pedants, without knowledge of man’s nature, or of boy’s; or of aught save their lexicons and quarterly account-books. Innumerable dead Vocables (no dead Language, for they themselves knew no Language) they crammed into us, and called it fostering the growth of mind. How can an inanimate, mechanical Gerund-grinder, the like of whom will, in a subsequent century, be manufactured at Nürnberg out of wood and leather, foster the growth of anything; much more of Mind, which grows, not like a vegetable (by having its roots littered with etymological compost), but like a spirit, by mysterious contact of Spirit; Thought kindling itself at the fire of living Thought? How shall he give kindling, in whose own inward man there is no live coal, but all is burnt-out to a dead grammatical cinder? The Hinterschlag Professors knew syntax enough; and of the human soul thus much: that it had a faculty called Memory, and could be acted-on through the muscular integument by appliance of birch-rods.
‘My teachers,’ he says, ‘were rigid and narrow-minded, lacking any understanding of human nature or that of boys; or of anything beyond their dictionaries and quarterly accounting books. They forced countless dead words (not a dead language, because they themselves didn’t understand any language) upon us, and called it nurturing the growth of the mind. How can a lifeless, mechanical grammar drill, the kind that will later be made in Nürnberg out of wood and leather, encourage the growth of anything; especially the mind, which does not grow like a plant (by having its roots stuffed with etymological waste), but like a spirit, through the mysterious connection of spirit; thought igniting itself at the fire of living thought? How can he provide that spark, in whose own inner being there is no live ember, but all is turned to a dead grammatical ash? The Hinterland professors knew enough syntax; and about the human soul, they knew only this much: that it had a faculty called memory, and could be influenced through the physical body by the use of birch rods.
‘Alas, so is it everywhere, so will it ever be; till the Hodman is discharged, or reduced to hodbearing, and an Architect is hired, and on all hands fitly encouraged: till communities and individuals discover, not without surprise, that fashioning the souls of a generation by Knowledge can rank on a level with blowing their bodies to pieces by Gunpowder; that with Generals and Fieldmarshals for killing, there should be world-honoured Dignitaries, and were it possible, true God-ordained Priests, for teaching. But as yet, though the Soldier wears openly, and even parades, his butchering-tool, nowhere, far as I have travelled, did the Schoolmaster make show of his instructing-tool: nay, were he to walk abroad with birch girt on thigh, as if he therefrom expected honour, would there not, among the idler class, perhaps a certain levity be excited?’
‘Unfortunately, it's the same everywhere, and it always will be; until the Hodman is let go or demoted to carrying a hod, and an Architect is brought in and everyone is properly encouraged: until communities and individuals realize, not without surprise, that shaping the minds of a generation through Knowledge can be as impactful as blowing their bodies apart with Gunpowder; that alongside Generals and Field Marshals who are celebrated for killing, there should also be respected leaders, and ideally, truly God-ordained Priests for teaching. But as of now, while Soldiers openly carry and even showcase their weapons, I have yet to see a Schoolmaster display his teaching tools anywhere I've traveled: in fact, if he were to walk around with a birch rod strapped to his thigh, as if he expected reverence from it, wouldn’t it perhaps provoke some amusement among the idle crowd?’
In the third year of this Gymnasic period, Father 81Andreas seems to have died: the young Scholar, otherwise so maltreated, saw himself for the first time clad outwardly in sables, and inwardly in quite inexpressible melancholy. ‘The dark bottomless Abyss, that lies under our feet, had yawned open; the pale kingdoms of Death, with all their innumerable silent nations and generations, stood before him; the inexorable word, Never! now first showed its meaning. My Mother wept, and her sorrow got vent; but in my heart there lay a whole lake of tears, pent-up in silent desolation. Nevertheless the unworn Spirit is strong; Life is so healthful that it even finds nourishment in Death: these stern experiences, planted down by Memory in my Imagination, rose there to a whole cypress-forest, sad but beautiful; waving, with not unmelodious sighs, in dark luxuriance, in the hottest sunshine, through long years of youth:—as in manhood also it does, and will do; for I have now pitched my tent under a Cypress-tree; the Tomb is now my inexpugnable Fortress, ever close by the gate of which I look upon the hostile armaments, and pains and penalties of tyrannous Life placidly enough, and listen to its loudest threatenings with a still smile. O ye loved ones, that already sleep in the noiseless Bed of Rest, whom in life I could only weep for and never help; and ye, who wide-scattered still toil lonely in the monster-bearing Desert, dyeing the flinty ground with your blood,—yet a little while, and we shall all meet THERE, and our Mother’s bosom will screen us all; and Oppression’s harness, and Sorrow’s fire-whip, and all the Gehenna Bailiffs that patrol and inhabit ever-vexed Time, cannot thenceforth harm us any more!’
In the third year of this gymnastic period, Father 81Andreas seems to have died: the young Scholar, who was otherwise mistreated, found himself for the first time wearing black on the outside and feeling an indescribable sadness on the inside. ‘The dark, bottomless Abyss beneath our feet had opened up; the pale realms of Death, with all their countless silent nations and generations, stood before him; the unyielding word, Never! now revealed its true meaning. My mother cried, and her sorrow had an outlet; but in my heart lay a vast lake of tears, trapped in silent despair. Nevertheless, the untamed Spirit is strong; Life is so nourishing that it even draws strength from Death: these harsh experiences, engraved by Memory in my Imagination, transformed into a whole forest of cypress trees, sad but beautiful; swaying, with not unmusical sighs, in dark richness, under the hot sun, throughout long years of youth:—as it does in manhood too, and will continue to do; for I have now pitched my tent under a Cypress tree; the Tomb is now my impenetrable Fortress, always close by the gate through which I view the hostile forces, and the pains and penalties of tyrannical Life with surprising calm, and listen to its loudest threats with a quiet smile. Oh, beloved ones, who already sleep in the quiet Bed of Rest, whom in life I could only weep for and never help; and you, who still toil alone in the monster-filled Desert, staining the stony ground with your blood,—just a little while longer, and we will all meet HERE, and our Mother’s embrace will shelter us all; and the burdens of Oppression, and the whip of Sorrow, and all the tormenting Bailiffs of Hell that patrol and inhabit our troubled Time, can no longer harm us!’
Close by which rather beautiful apostrophe, lies a laboured Character of the deceased Andreas Futteral; of his natural ability, his deserts in life (as Prussian Sergeant); with long historical inquiries into the genealogy of the Futteral Family, here traced back as far as Henry the Fowler: the whole of which we pass over, not without astonishment. It only concerns us to add, that now was the time when Mother Gretchen revealed to her foster-son that he was not at all of this kindred, or indeed of any kindred, having come into 82historical existence in the way already known to us. ‘Thus was I doubly orphaned,’ says he; ‘bereft not only of Possession, but even of Remembrance. Sorrow and Wonder, here suddenly united, could not but produce abundant fruit. Such a disclosure, in such a season, struck its roots through my whole nature: ever till the years of mature manhood, it mingled with my whole thoughts, was as the stem whereon all my day-dreams and night-dreams grew. A certain poetic elevation, yet also a corresponding civic depression, it naturally imparted: I was like no other; in which fixed-idea, leading sometimes to highest, and oftener to frightfullest results, may there not lie the first spring of Tendencies, which in my Life have become remarkable enough? As in birth, so in action, speculation, and social position, my fellows are perhaps not numerous.’
Nearby, beneath a rather beautiful inscription, lies a detailed account of the deceased Andreas Futteral; discussing his natural talents, his achievements in life (as a Prussian Sergeant), and delving into the family history of the Futteral lineage, traced back to Henry the Fowler: all of which we skim over, not without amazement. It only matters to add that this was the moment when Mother Gretchen revealed to her foster-son that he was not actually part of this family, or indeed any family, having come into existence as we already know. ‘Thus was I doubly orphaned,’ he says; ‘deprived not only of belongings but even of memory. Sorrow and wonder, suddenly combined, could only bear abundant fruit. Such a revelation, at such a time, deeply affected my entire being: until the years of adulthood, it intertwined with all my thoughts, serving as the foundation on which all my daydreams and nightmares were built. It imparted a certain poetic elevation, yet also a corresponding civic depression: I was like no other; in this fixed idea, sometimes leading to the highest outcomes and more often to the most terrifying results, could there not lie the first hint of tendencies that in my life have become notably significant? In terms of birth, action, speculation, and social standing, my peers are perhaps not numerous.’
In the Bag Sagittarius, as we at length discover, Teufelsdröckh has become a University man; though, how, when, or of what quality, will nowhere disclose itself with the smallest certainty. Few things, in the way of confusion and capricious indistinctness, can now surprise our readers; not even the total want of dates, almost without parallel in a Biographical work. So enigmatic, so chaotic we have always found, and must always look to find, these scattered Leaves. In Sagittarius, however, Teufelsdröckh begins to show himself even more than usually Sibylline: fragments of all sorts; scraps of regular Memoir, College-Exercises, Programs, Professional Testimoniums, Milkscores, torn Billets, sometimes to appearance of an amatory cast; all blown together as if by merest chance, henceforth bewilder the sane Historian. To combine any picture of these University, and the subsequent, years; much more, to decipher therein any illustrative primordial elements of the Clothes-Philosophy, becomes such a problem as the reader may imagine.
In the section Sagittarius, we finally learn that Teufelsdröckh has become a university student; however, the details of how, when, or the nature of his experience remain completely unclear. There’s little left that can surprise our readers in terms of confusion and unpredictability, not even the complete absence of dates, which is almost unheard of in a biographical work. These scattered Leaves have always been enigmatic and chaotic, and we can expect that they will continue to be so. In Sagittarius, though, Teufelsdröckh starts to present himself in an even more mysterious way: fragments of all kinds; bits of formal memoirs, college assignments, programs, professional references, grades, and sometimes even what appears to be love notes; all mixed together as if by pure coincidence, creating a puzzle for the rational historian. Piecing together any clear picture of his university years and what followed, or even figuring out the foundational elements of the Clothes-Philosophy found within, becomes a challenge that readers might find difficult to imagine.
So much we can see; darkly, as through the foliage of some wavering thicket: a youth of no common endowment, who has passed happily through Childhood, less happily yet still vigorously through Boyhood, now 83at length perfect in ‘dead vocables,’ and set down, as he hopes, by the living Fountain, there to superadd Ideas and Capabilities. From such Fountain he draws, diligently, thirstily, yet never or seldom with his whole heart, for the water nowise suits his palate; discouragements, entanglements, aberrations are discoverable or supposable. Nor perhaps are even pecuniary distresses wanting; for ‘the good Gretchen, who in spite of advices from not disinterested relatives has sent him hither, must after a time withdraw her willing but too feeble hand.’ Nevertheless in an atmosphere of Poverty and manifold Chagrin, the Humour of that young Soul, what character is in him, first decisively reveals itself; and, like strong sunshine in weeping skies, gives out variety of colours, some of which are prismatic. Thus, with the aid of Time and of what Time brings, has the stripling Diogenes Teufelsdröckh waxed into manly stature; and into so questionable an aspect, that we ask with new eagerness, How he specially came by it, and regret anew that there is no more explicit answer. Certain of the intelligible and partially significant fragments, which are few in number, shall be extracted from that Limbo of a Paper-bag, and presented with the usual preparation.
So much we can see, though it's unclear, like looking through the branches of a swaying thicket: a young man with exceptional talent, who has gone through Childhood happily, and less happily but still energetically through Boyhood, is now, 83 finally skilled in ‘dead words,’ and is hopeful that he can add Ideas and Abilities at the living Fountain. He draws from this Fountain, working hard and eagerly, but rarely with his whole heart, since the water doesn’t really satisfy him; obstacles, complications, and distractions are either obvious or can be guessed. There may also be financial struggles, as ‘the good Gretchen, who despite advice from less-than-objective relatives has sent him here, will eventually have to pull back her willing but too weak support.’ Still, in an atmosphere of Poverty and various Disappointments, the character of that young Soul reveals itself for the first time; and, like bright sunshine on a rainy day, it shines with a variety of colors, some of which are like a rainbow. Thus, with the help of Time and what it brings, the young Diogenes Teufelsdröckh has grown into a mature form; and into such an uncertain state that we ask with renewed curiosity, how he came to be this way, and we regret again that there’s no clearer answer. Some of the understandable and somewhat meaningful fragments, which are few in number, will be taken from that Limbo of a Paper-bag and presented with the usual setup.
As if, in the Bag Scorpio, Teufelsdröckh had not already expectorated his antipedagogic spleen; as if, from the name Sagittarius, he had thought himself called upon to shoot arrows, we here again fall-in with such matter as this: ‘The University where I was educated still stands vivid enough in my remembrance, and I know its name well; which name, however, I, from tenderness to existing interests and persons, shall in nowise divulge. It is my painful duty to say that, out of England and Spain, ours was the worst of all hitherto discovered Universities. This is indeed a time when right Education is, as nearly as may be, impossible: however, in degrees of wrongness there is no limit: nay, I can conceive a worse system than that of the Nameless itself; as poisoned victual may be worse than absolute hunger.
As if in the Bag Scorpio, Teufelsdröckh hadn't already shared his anti-educational frustrations; as if, because of the name Sagittarius, he felt compelled to shoot arrows, we come across this again: ‘The university where I studied is still clear in my memory, and I know its name well; however, out of respect for current interests and people, I will not reveal it. It’s painful for me to say that, aside from England and Spain, ours was the worst of all the universities discovered so far. This is truly a time when proper education is nearly impossible: however, when it comes to degrees of wrongness, there’s no limit. In fact, I can imagine a worse system than that of the Nameless itself; just as poisoned food could be worse than absolute hunger.
‘It is written, When the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch: wherefore, in such circumstances, 84may it not sometimes be safer, if both leader and led simply—sit still? Had you, anywhere in Crim Tartary; walled-in a square enclosure; furnished it with a small, ill-chosen Library; and then turned loose into it eleven-hundred Christian striplings, to tumble about as they listed, from three to seven years: certain persons, under the title of Professors, being stationed at the gates, to declare aloud that it was a University, and exact considerable admission-fees,—you had, not indeed in mechanical structure, yet in spirit and result, some imperfect resemblance of our High Seminary. I say, imperfect; for if our mechanical structure was quite other, so neither was our result altogether the same: unhappily, we were not in Crim Tartary, but in a corrupt European city, full of smoke and sin; moreover, in the middle of a Public, which, without far costlier apparatus than that of the Square Enclosure, and Declaration aloud, you could not be sure of gulling.
‘It’s been said, when the blind lead the blind, both will fall into the ditch. So, isn't it sometimes safer for both the leader and the followers to just sit still? If you were to take a square enclosure somewhere in Crim Tartary, fill it with a poorly chosen library, and then let eleven hundred Christian youths run around freely for three to seven years, with some people at the gates claiming it’s a university and charging hefty admission fees, you would have, not exactly in structure but in spirit and outcome, something like our Higher Education Institution. I say "like" because, while our structure was quite different, our results weren’t entirely the same either. Unfortunately, we weren’t in Crim Tartary; we were in a corrupt European city, filled with smoke and sin. Moreover, in the middle of the public, without far more expensive setups than just a square enclosure and loud declarations, you couldn’t guarantee you’d fool anyone.’
‘Gullible, however, by fit apparatus, all Publics are; and gulled, with the most surprising profit. Towards anything like a Statistics of Imposture, indeed, little as yet has been done: with a strange indifference, our Economists, nigh buried under Tables for minor Branches of Industry, have altogether overlooked the grand all-overtopping Hypocrisy Branch; as if our whole arts of Puffery, of Quackery, Priestcraft, Kingcraft, and the innumerable other crafts and mysteries of that genus, had not ranked in Productive Industry at all! Can any one, for example, so much as say, What moneys, in Literature and Shoeblacking, are realised by actual Instruction and actual jet Polish; what by fictitious-persuasive Proclamation of such; specifying, in distinct items, the distributions, circulations, disbursements, incomings of said moneys, with the smallest approach to accuracy? But to ask, How far, in all the several infinitely-complected departments of social business, in government, education, in manual, commercial, intellectual fabrication of every sort, man’s Want is supplied by true Ware; how far by the mere Appearance of true Ware:—in other words, To what extent, by what methods, with what effects, in various times and countries, Deception takes the place of wages 85of Performance: here truly is an Inquiry big with results for the future time, but to which hitherto only the vaguest answer can be given. If for the present, in our Europe, we estimate the ratio of Ware to Appearance of Ware so high even as at One to a Hundred (which, considering the Wages of a Pope, Russian Autocrat, or English Game-Preserver, is probably not far from the mark),—what almost prodigious saving may there not be anticipated, as the Statistics of Imposture advances, and so the manufacturing of Shams (that of Realities rising into clearer and clearer distinction therefrom) gradually declines, and at length becomes all but wholly unnecessary!
‘Everyone is easily fooled, thanks to the right setup; and they’re deceived to surprisingly great benefit. When it comes to something like Statistics of Imposture, not much has been accomplished so far. Our Economists, buried under tons of tables for minor industries, seem to have completely ignored the huge and obvious Hypocrisy sector; as if all our skills in Deception, Quackery, Priestcraft, Kingcraft, and countless other tricks of that kind didn't count in Productive Industry at all! Can anyone even say, what money in Literature and Shoeblacking comes from actual Teaching and real shoe polish versus what comes from the persuasive promotion of that? Specifying, item by item, the distributions, circulations, expenses, and earnings of that money, with at least some accuracy? But to ask, how much, across all the complex areas of social business—government, education, various types of manufacturing, commercial and intellectual production—man's needs are met by genuine products; and how much by the mere Appearance of genuine products:—in other words, to what extent, by what methods, and with what effects, in different times and places, Deception replaces the wages of Performance: this is truly a question ripe with future implications, yet only the most vague answers can be offered so far. If we currently estimate the ratio of Real Products to the Appearance of Products in Europe at as high as One to One Hundred (which, considering the earnings of a Pope, Russian Autocrat, or English Game-Preserver, isn't far off),—what an incredible potential saving could be expected as the Statistics of Imposture develop, and the making of Fakes (with Realities gradually becoming clearer and clearer) declines and eventually becomes almost entirely unnecessary!
‘This for the coming golden ages. What I had to remark, for the present brazen one, is, that in several provinces, as in Education, Polity, Religion, where so much is wanted and indispensable, and so little can as yet be furnished, probably Imposture is of sanative, anodyne nature, and man’s Gullibility not his worst blessing. Suppose your sinews of war quite broken; I mean your military chest insolvent, forage all but exhausted; and that the whole army is about to mutiny, disband, and cut your and each other’s throat,—then were it not well could you, as if by miracle, pay them in any sort of fairy-money, feed them on coagulated water, or mere imagination of meat; whereby, till the real supply came up, they might be kept together and quiet? Such perhaps was the aim of Nature, who does nothing without aim, in furnishing her favourite, Man, with this his so omnipotent or rather omnipatient Talent of being Gulled.
‘This is for the upcoming golden ages. What I want to point out about the current bold one is that in several areas, like Education, Politics, and Religion, where so much is needed and essential, but so little can be provided, it’s likely that Deception has a healing, soothing quality, and that human Naivety might not be such a terrible gift. Imagine your resources for war completely depleted; I mean, your military funds are empty, supplies nearly gone; and the entire army is on the verge of mutiny, ready to disband and turn on each other—wouldn’t it be useful if, as if by magic, you could pay them with some sort of imaginary money, feed them with condensed water, or just the idea of food? This way, until real supplies arrived, they could be kept together and calm. Perhaps this was Nature’s intention, who never acts without purpose, in giving her favorite, Man, this powerful or rather enduring Talent for being Deceived.’
‘How beautifully it works, with a little mechanism; nay, almost makes mechanism for itself! These Professors in the Nameless lived with ease, with safety, by a mere Reputation, constructed in past times, and then too with no great effort, by quite another class of persons. Which Reputation, like a strong, brisk-going undershot wheel, sunk into the general current, bade fair, with only a little annual repainting on their part, to hold long together, and of its own accord assiduously grind for them. Happy that it was so, for the Millers! They themselves needed not to work; their attempts 86at working, at what they called Educating, now when I look back on it, filled me with a certain mute admiration.
‘How beautifully it functions, almost creating its own mechanism! These Professors in the Nameless lived comfortably and safely on a mere Reputation, built in the past with little effort by a completely different group of people. This Reputation, like a strong, efficient undershot wheel, immersed in the general flow, seemed likely, with just a bit of annual maintenance from them, to last a long time and tirelessly work for them on its own. Thankfully, it was so for the Millers! They themselves didn’t need to put in any work; their efforts at what they called Education, when I reflect on it now, fill me with a certain silent admiration.
‘Besides all this, we boasted ourselves a Rational University; in the highest degree hostile to Mysticism; thus was the young vacant mind furnished with much talk about Progress of the Species, Dark Ages, Prejudice, and the like; so that all were quickly enough blown out into a state of windy argumentativeness; whereby the better sort had soon to end in sick, impotent Scepticism; the worser sort explode (crepiren) in finished Self-conceit, and to all spiritual intents become dead.—But this too is portion of mankind’s lot. If our era is the Era of Unbelief, why murmur under it; is there not a better coming, nay come? As in long-drawn Systole and long-drawn Diastole, must the period of Faith alternate with the period of Denial; must the vernal growth, the summer luxuriance of all Opinions, Spiritual Representations and Creations, be followed by, and again follow, the autumnal decay, the winter dissolution. For man lives in Time, has his whole earthly being, endeavour and destiny shaped for him by Time: only in the transitory Time-Symbol is the ever-motionless Eternity we stand on made manifest. And yet, in such winter-seasons of Denial, it is for the nobler-minded perhaps a comparative misery to have been born, and to be awake and work; and for the duller a felicity, if, like hibernating animals, safe-lodged in some Salamanca University, or Sybaris City, or other superstitious or voluptuous Castle of Indolence, they can slumber-through, in stupid dreams, and only awaken when the loud-roaring hailstorms have all done their work, and to our prayers and martyrdoms the new Spring has been vouchsafed.’
‘On top of all this, we proudly considered ourselves a Rational University, completely against Mysticism. This left the young, impressionable minds filled with discussions about Progress of the Species, the Dark Ages, Prejudice, and similar topics, leading everyone to quickly become argumentative. Consequently, the more thoughtful individuals often ended up in a state of sickly, powerless Scepticism, while the less reflective ones puffed up with complete Self-conceit, becoming spiritually dead. But this is just part of humanity's experience. If our time is the Era of Unbelief, why complain about it? Isn't there something better on the horizon, or perhaps already here? Just like the long cycles of contraction and expansion, the period of Faith must alternate with the period of Denial; the spring growth and summer abundance of ideas, spiritual representations, and creations must inevitably be followed by autumn decline and winter dissolution. Humanity exists in Time; our entire earthly existence, efforts, and destiny are shaped by Time. It's only in the fleeting symbols of Time that the constant Eternity we stand on becomes apparent. Yet, during these winter seasons of Denial, it can be a considerable burden for the more noble-minded to have been born, to be awake, and to work. Meanwhile, for the less perceptive, it can be a blessing if they can, like hibernating animals, comfortably settle in some Salamanca University, Sybaris City, or other lazy and indulgent place, allowing them to drift through in dull dreams, only waking when the stormy troubles have past and the new Spring from our prayers and sacrifices has finally arrived.’
That in the environment, here mysteriously enough shadowed forth, Teufelsdröckh must have felt ill at ease, cannot be doubtful. ‘The hungry young,’ he says, ‘looked up to their spiritual Nurses; and, for food, were bidden eat the east-wind. What vain jargon of controversial Metaphysic, Etymology, and mechanical Manipulation falsely named Science, was current there, I indeed learned, better perhaps than the most. Among 87eleven-hundred Christian youths, there will not be wanting some eleven eager to learn. By collision with such, a certain warmth, a certain polish was communicated; by instinct and happy accident, I took less to rioting (renommiren), than to thinking and reading, which latter also I was free to do. Nay from the chaos of that Library, I succeeded in fishing-up more books perhaps than had been known to the very keepers thereof. The foundation of a Literary Life was hereby laid : I learned, on my own strength, to read fluently in almost all cultivated languages, on almost all subjects and sciences; farther, as man is ever the prime object to man, already it was my favourite employment to read character in speculation, and from the Writing to construe the Writer. A certain groundplan of Human Nature and Life began to fashion itself in me; wondrous enough, now when I look back on it; for my whole Universe, physical and spiritual, was as yet a Machine! However, such a conscious, recognised groundplan, the truest I had, was beginning to be there, and by additional experiments might be corrected and indefinitely extended.’
That in the environment, which was mysteriously outlined here, Teufelsdröckh must have definitely felt uncomfortable. “The hungry youth,” he says, “looked up to their spiritual mentors; and, for nourishment, were told to eat the east wind. What useless chatter about conflicting Metaphysics, Etymology, and what was falsely called Science, was popular there, I learned better than most perhaps. Among 87eleven-hundred Christian youths, there would surely be some eager to learn. By interacting with them, I picked up a certain warmth and polish; by instinct and happy chance, I spent less time partying (renommiren) and more time thinking and reading, which I was free to do. In fact, from the chaos of that Library, I managed to find more books than even the keepers probably knew existed. This laid the foundation for a literary life: I learned on my own how to read fluently in almost all cultivated languages, on almost all topics and fields of study; furthermore, since humans are always the primary concern for humans, it became my favorite activity to read character in speculation and interpret the Writer from the Writing. A certain framework of Human Nature and Life started to take shape within me; it’s quite astonishing to think back on it, because my entire Universe, physical and spiritual, was still just a Machine! However, this conscious, recognized framework, the truest I had, was starting to emerge, and with further experiences, it could be refined and expanded endlessly.”
Thus from poverty does the strong educe nobler wealth; thus in the destitution of the wild desert does our young Ishmael acquire for himself the highest of all possessions, that of Self-help. Nevertheless a desert this was, waste, and howling with savage monsters. Teufelsdröckh gives us long details of his ‘fever-paroxysms of Doubt’; his Inquiries concerning Miracles, and the Evidences of religious Faith; and how ‘in the silent night-watches, still darker in his heart than over sky and earth, he has cast himself before the All-seeing, and with audible prayers cried vehemently for Light, for deliverance from Death and the Grave. Not till after long years, and unspeakable agonies, did the believing heart surrender; sink into spell-bound sleep, under the night-mare, Unbelief; and, in this hag-ridden dream, mistake God’s fair living world for a pallid, vacant Hades and extinct Pandemonium. But through such Purgatory pain,’ continues he, ‘it is appointed us to pass; first must the dead Letter of Religion own itself dead, and drop piecemeal into dust, 88if the living Spirit of Religion, freed from this its charnel-house, is to arise on us, newborn of Heaven, and with new healing under its wings.’
Thus from poverty, the strong brings forth greater wealth; thus in the emptiness of the wild desert, our young Ishmael gains the greatest possession of all, that of self-help. Nevertheless, this was indeed a desert, barren and filled with savage monsters. Teufelsdröckh shares in detail his "feverish attacks of doubt"; his inquiries about miracles and the evidence of religious faith; and how "in the silent watches of the night, darker in his heart than over the sky and earth, he cast himself before the All-seeing, crying out loud for light, for deliverance from death and the grave." It wasn't until after many years and unimaginable suffering that the believing heart gave in; it sank into a spellbound sleep under the nightmare of unbelief; and in this haunted dream, mistook God’s vibrant living world for a pale, empty Hades and extinct Pandemonium. "But through such purgatorial pain," he continues, "it is our fate to endure; first, the dead letter of religion must acknowledge its own deadness and crumble into dust, 88 if the living spirit of religion, freed from this charnel house, is to rise upon us, reborn from Heaven, bringing new healing under its wings."
To which Purgatory pains, seemingly severe enough, if we add a liberal measure of Earthly distresses, want of practical guidance, want of sympathy, want of money, want of hope; and all this in the fervid season of youth, so exaggerated in imagining, so boundless in desires, yet here so poor in means,—do we not see a strong incipient spirit oppressed and overloaded from without and from within; the fire of genius struggling-up among fuel-wood of the greenest, and as yet with more of bitter vapour than of clear flame?
To the pains of Purgatory, which seem harsh enough, if we throw in a good dose of earthly troubles—lack of practical guidance, lack of sympathy, lack of money, lack of hope—and all this during the intense season of youth, which is so exaggerated in imagination and so limitless in desires, yet here so lacking in resources—don't we see a strong emerging spirit weighed down and overwhelmed from both outside and within? The fire of genius is trying to rise up amid the greenest fuel, and right now it has more bitter smoke than bright flame?
From various fragments of Letters and other documentary scraps, it is to be inferred that Teufelsdröckh, isolated, shy, retiring as he was, had not altogether escaped notice: certain established men are aware of his existence; and, if stretching-out no helpful hand, have at least their eyes on him. He appears, though in dreary enough humour, to be addressing himself to the Profession of Law;—whereof, indeed, the world has since seen him a public graduate. But omitting these broken, unsatisfactory thrums of Economical relation, let us present rather the following small thread of Moral relation; and therewith, the reader for himself weaving it in at the right place, conclude our dim arras-picture of these University years.
From various bits of letters and other documents, we can see that Teufelsdröckh, despite being isolated, shy, and withdrawn, hasn't gone completely unnoticed; certain established figures know he exists and, while they don’t offer him any help, at least keep an eye on him. He seems, albeit in a pretty gloomy mood, to be pursuing a career in law—of which the world has since recognized him as a public graduate. But instead of delving into these fragmented, unsatisfactory aspects of his economic relationships, let’s focus on this small thread of moral connections; and with that, the reader can weave it in at the right moment, completing our vague tapestry of his university years.
‘Here also it was that I formed acquaintance with Herr Towgood, or, as it is perhaps better written, Herr Toughgut; a young person of quality (von Adel), from the interior parts of England. He stood connected, by blood and hospitality, with the Counts von Zähdarm, in this quarter of Germany; to which noble Family I likewise was, by his means, with all friendliness, brought near. Towgood had a fair talent, unspeakably ill-cultivated; with considerable humour of character: and, bating his total ignorance, for he knew nothing except Boxing and a little Grammar, showed less of that aristocratic impassivity, and silent fury, than for most part belongs to Travellers of his nation. To him I owe my first practical knowledge of the English and their ways; perhaps also something of the partiality with which I 89have ever since regarded that singular people. Towgood was not without an eye, could he have come at any light. Invited doubtless by the presence of the Zähdarm Family, he had travelled hither, in the almost frantic hope of perfecting his studies; he, whose studies had as yet been those of infancy, hither to a University where so much as the notion of perfection, not to say the effort after it, no longer existed! Often we would condole over the hard destiny of the Young in this era: how, after all our toil, we were to be turned-out into the world, with beards on our chins indeed, but with few other attributes of manhood; no existing thing that we were trained to Act on, nothing that we could so much as Believe. “How has our head on the outside a polished Hat,” would Towgood exclaim, “and in the inside Vacancy, or a froth of Vocables and Attorney-Logic! At a small cost men are educated to make leather into shoes; but at a great cost, what am I educated to make? By Heaven, Brother! what I have already eaten and worn, as I came thus far, would endow a considerable Hospital of Incurables.”—“Man, indeed,” I would answer, “has a Digestive Faculty, which must be kept working, were it even partly by stealth. But as for our Mis-education, make not bad worse; waste not the time yet ours, in trampling on thistles because they have yielded us no figs. Frisch zu, Bruder! Here are Books, and we have brains to read them; here is a whole Earth and a whole Heaven, and we have eyes to look on them: Frisch zu!”
‘Here is where I got to know Herr Towgood, or, as it might be better spelled, Herr Toughgut; a young person of noble birth, from the inland parts of England. He was connected by both blood and hospitality to the Counts von Zähdarm, in this part of Germany; and through him, I was also brought closer to this noble family in a very friendly manner. Towgood had a fair talent, impressively unrefined, and a good sense of humor. Aside from his complete ignorance—since he only knew about boxing and a bit of grammar—he showed less of that typical aristocratic indifference and quiet rage that travelers from his country usually have. I owe my first practical understanding of the English and their ways to him; perhaps he’s also responsible for my ongoing fondness for this unique people. Towgood had an eye for things, if he could have been enlightened. Surely invited by the presence of the Zähdarm Family, he had come here with almost frantic hopes of enhancing his studies, even though his prior studies had only been those of childhood, to a university where the very idea of perfection, let alone striving for it, was long gone! We often lamented the harsh fate of young people today: how, despite all our efforts, we were being sent out into the world, with beards on our chins, but with few other indicators of manhood; nothing that we were trained to act upon, nothing we could even believe in. “How is it,” Towgood would exclaim, “that our heads on the outside wear polished hats, while inside there’s emptiness or a mere froth of words and legal jargon! At little expense, men are trained to turn leather into shoes; but at great expense, what am I trained to make? By heaven, brother! What I’ve already eaten and worn to get this far could support a significant hospital for the incurable.” —“Indeed, man,” I would reply, “has a digestive system that must keep functioning, even if somewhat deceitfully. But as for our miseducation, let’s not make things worse; let’s not waste our remaining time complaining about thistles because they’ve given us no figs. Frisch zu, Bruder! Here are books, and we have brains to read them; here is a whole Earth and a whole Heaven, and we have eyes to see them: Frisch zu!”
‘Often also our talk was gay; not without brilliancy, and even fire. We looked-out on Life, with its strange scaffolding, where all at once harlequins dance, and men are beheaded and quartered: motley, not unterrific was the aspect; but we looked on it like brave youths. For myself, these were perhaps my most genial hours. Towards this young warmhearted, strongheaded and wrongheaded Herr Towgood I was even near experiencing the now obsolete sentiment of Friendship. Yes, foolish Heathen that I was, I felt that, under certain conditions, I could have loved this man, and taken him to my bosom, and been his brother once and always. By degrees, however, I understood the new time, and 90its wants. If man’s Soul is indeed, as in the Finnish Language, and Utilitarian Philosophy, a kind of Stomach, what else is the true meaning of Spiritual Union but an Eating together? Thus we, instead of Friends, are Dinner-guests; and here as elsewhere have cast away chimeras.’
‘Often, our conversations were lively, with moments of brilliance and even passion. We viewed life with its strange framework, where suddenly harlequins dance and men are executed: the scene was colorful and not without its horrors, yet we faced it like brave young men. For me, these were perhaps my most joyful moments. Towards this young, warmhearted, strong-minded, and often misguided Herr Towgood, I even found myself feeling the now outdated sentiment of Friendship. Yes, foolish person that I was, I felt that under certain circumstances, I could have loved this man, embraced him as my brother, and always stood by him. Gradually, however, I came to understand the new era and its needs. If a man’s Soul is indeed, as in Finnish Language and Utilitarian Philosophy, a sort of Stomach, what else does true Spiritual Union mean but sharing a meal together? So, instead of being Friends, we become Dinner-guests; and here, like elsewhere, we have discarded illusions.’
So ends, abruptly as is usual, and enigmatically, this little incipient romance. What henceforth becomes of the brave Herr Towgood, or Toughgut? He has dived-under, in the Autobiographical Chaos, and swims we see not where. Does any reader ‘in the interior parts of England’ know of such a man?
So ends, abruptly as usual and mysteriously, this little budding romance. What happens next to the brave Herr Towgood, or Toughgut? He has disappeared into the Autobiographical Chaos, and we can't see where he’s swimming. Does any reader 'in the rural parts of England' know about such a man?
CHAPTER IV
CHAPTER 4
GETTING UNDER WAY
‘Thus, nevertheless,’ writes our autobiographer, apparently as quitting College, ‘was there realised Somewhat; namely, I, Diogenes Teufelsdröckh: a visible Temporary Figure (Zeitbild), occupying some cubic feet of Space, and containing within it Forces both physical and spiritual; hopes, passions, thoughts; the whole wondrous furniture, in more or less perfection, belonging to that mystery, a Man. Capabilities there were in me to give battle, in some small degree, against the great Empire of Darkness: does not the very Ditcher and Delver, with his spade, extinguish many a thistle and puddle; and so leave a little Order, where he found the opposite? Nay your very Daymoth has capabilities in this kind; and ever organises something (into its own Body, if no otherwise), which was before Inorganic; and of mute dead air makes living music, though only of the faintest, by humming.
So, still,’ writes our autobiographer, apparently as he leaves college, ‘there was something realized; namely, I, Diogenes Teufelsdröckh: a visible Temporary Figure (Zeitbild), taking up some space and containing within me both physical and spiritual forces; hopes, passions, thoughts; the whole amazing assortment, in varying degrees of completeness, that makes up the mystery of being a Man. There were abilities in me to push back, even a little, against the vast Empire of Darkness: doesn’t even the simplest laborer, with his shovel, clear away many a weed and puddle; creating a bit of order where there was chaos? Even the tiniest insect has its own abilities in this way; it constantly creates something (into its own body, if nothing else) from what was previously unformed; and from lifeless air, it makes faint music by buzzing.
‘How much more, one whose capabilities are spiritual; who has learned, or begun learning, the grand thaumaturgic art of Thought! Thaumaturgic I name it; for hitherto all Miracles have been wrought thereby, and henceforth innumerable will be wrought; whereof we, even in these days, witness some. Of the Poet’s and Prophet’s inspired Message, and how it makes and 91unmakes whole worlds, I shall forbear mention: but cannot the dullest hear Steam-engines clanking around him? Has he not seen the Scottish Brassmith’s Idea (and this but a mechanical one) travelling on fire-wings round the Cape, and across two Oceans; and stronger than any other Enchanter’s Familiar, on all hands unweariedly fetching and carrying: at home, not only weaving Cloth, but rapidly enough overturning the whole old system of Society; and, for Feudalism and Preservation of the Game, preparing us, by indirect but sure methods, Industrialism and the Government of the Wisest? Truly a Thinking Man is the worst enemy the Prince of Darkness can have; every time such a one announces himself, I doubt not, there runs a shudder through the Nether Empire; and new Emissaries are trained, with new tactics, to, if possible, entrap him, and hoodwink and handcuff him.
‘How much more, someone whose abilities are spiritual; who has learned, or started to learn, the amazing art of Thought! I call it amazing because all Miracles have come from it, and countless more will continue to emerge from it; some of which we even witness today. I won’t go into the Poet’s and Prophet’s inspired Message, and how it creates and destroys entire worlds, but can’t even the dullest person hear steam engines clanking around them? Haven’t they seen the Scottish Brassmith’s Concept (which is just a mechanical one) flying around the Cape and across two Oceans; tirelessly fetching and carrying everywhere: at home, not only weaving fabric, but also quickly changing the entire old system of Society; and, away from Feudalism and Preservation of the Game, preparing us, through indirect but sure methods, for Industrialism and the Rule of the Wisest? Truly, a Thinking Person is the worst enemy the Prince of Darkness can have; every time such a person announces themselves, I have no doubt there’s a shudder through the Nether Empire; and new agents are trained, with new strategies, to, if possible, trap him, deceive him, and restrain him.
‘With such high vocation had I too, as denizen of the Universe, been called. Unhappy it is, however, that though born to the amplest Sovereignty, in this way, with no less than sovereign right of Peace and War against the Time-Prince (Zeitfürst), or Devil, and all his Dominions, your coronation-ceremony costs such trouble, your sceptre is so difficult to get at, or even to get eye on!’
‘With such a grand purpose, I too, as a part of the Universe, have been summoned. It’s unfortunate, though, that even though I was born with the greatest power, having the full right to Peace and War against the Time-Prince (Zeitfürst), or Devil, and all his realms, your coronation ceremony is such a hassle, your scepter is so hard to reach, or even to see!’
By which last wiredrawn similitude does Teufelsdröckh mean no more than that young men find obstacles in what we call ‘getting under way’? ‘Not what I Have,’ continues he, ‘but what I Do is my Kingdom. To each is given a certain inward Talent, a certain outward Environment of Fortune; to each, by wisest combination of these two, a certain maximum of Capability. But the hardest problem were ever this first: To find by study of yourself, and of the ground you stand on, what your combined inward and outward Capability specially is. For, alas, our young soul is all budding with Capabilities, and we see not yet which is the main and true one. Always too the new man is in a new time, under new conditions; his course can be the fac-simile of no prior one, but is by its nature original. And then how seldom will the outward Capability fit the inward: though talented 92wonderfully enough, we are poor, unfriended, dyspeptical, bashful; nay what is worse than all, we are foolish. Thus, in a whole imbroglio of Capabilities, we go stupidly groping about, to grope which is ours, and often clutch the wrong one: in this mad work must several years of our small term be spent, till the purblind Youth, by practice, acquire notions of distance, and become a seeing Man. Nay, many so spend their whole term, and in ever-new expectation, ever-new disappointment, shift from enterprise to enterprise, and from side to side: till at length, as exasperated striplings of threescore-and-ten, they shift into their last enterprise, that of getting buried.
By that last stretched analogy, Teufelsdröckh means that young people face challenges in what we call ‘getting started’? ‘It’s not what I have,’ he goes on, ‘but what I do that is my Kingdom. Everyone is given a unique inner talent and a specific outer environment shaped by fortune; by wisely combining these two, each person can achieve a certain maximum of capability. But the hardest task has always been this first one: to figure out, through self-reflection and understanding the ground you stand on, what your unique inner and outer capabilities are. Sadly, our young spirit is full of potential, and we don’t yet see which talent is the main and true one. Also, the new person exists in a new time, under different conditions; their path can’t be a replica of any past one but is naturally original. And how rarely does the outer capability match the inner one: even if we have great talents, we can still be poor, lonely, anxious, and shy; worse still, we can be foolish. So, in a whole mess of capabilities, we stumble around aimlessly trying to figure out which is ours, often grabbing the wrong one: in this crazy process, we can waste several years of our short lives, until the blind youth, through experience, gains a sense of direction and becomes a clear-sighted adult. Many end up spending their entire lives in constant hope, only to face fresh disappointments, moving from one endeavor to another, side to side, until finally, as frustrated individuals in their seventies, they embark on their last project—getting buried.
‘Such, since the most of us are too ophthalmic, would be the general fate; were it not that one thing saves us: our Hunger. For on this ground, as the prompt nature of Hunger is well known, must a prompt choice be made: hence have we, with wise foresight, Indentures and Apprenticeships for our irrational young; whereby, in due season, the vague universality of a Man shall find himself ready-moulded into a specific Craftsman; and so thenceforth work, with much or with little waste of Capability as it may be; yet not with the worst waste, that of time. Nay even in matters spiritual, since the spiritual artist too is born blind, and does not, like certain other creatures, receive sight in nine days, but far later, sometimes never,—is it not well that there should be what we call Professions, or Bread-studies (Brodzwecke), pre-appointed us? Here, circling like the gin-horse, for whom partial or total blindness is no evil, the Bread-artist can travel contentedly round and round, still fancying that it is forward and forward; and realise much: for himself victual; for the world an additional horse’s power in the grand corn-mill or hemp-mill of Economic Society. For me too had such a leading-string been provided; only that it proved a neck-halter, and had nigh throttled me, till I broke it off. Then, in the words of Ancient Pistol, did the world generally become mine oyster, which I, by strength or cunning, was to open, as I would and could. Almost had I deceased (fast wär ich umgekommen), so obstinately did it continue shut.’
‘Since most of us are pretty shortsighted, that would be the general fate; if not for one thing that saves us: our Hunger. Given that Hunger’s nature is well known, a quick decision must be made: that’s why we have, with wise foresight, Indentures and Apprenticeships for our irrational youth; so that, in time, the vague potential of a person is shaped into a specific Craftsman; and thereafter, they can work with varying levels of efficiency as it may be; yet not with the worst waste, which is time. Even in spiritual matters, since the spiritual artist is also born blind, and does not, unlike some other creatures, gain sight in nine days, but quite later, sometimes never,—isn’t it good that there are what we call Professions, or Bread-studies (Brodzwecke) pre-arranged for us? Here, like a horse on a gin, for whom partial or total blindness is no issue, the Bread-artist can happily go round and round, still thinking it’s moving forward; and accomplishing much: providing for themselves and offering the world an extra horsepower in the grand corn-mill or hemp-mill of Economic Society. For me too, such a guiding string had been given; only that it became a noose around my neck, nearly choking me until I broke free. Then, as the Ancient Pistol would say, the world became my oyster, which I was to open by strength or cunning, as I wanted and could. Almost did I perish (fast wär ich umgekommen), as it stubbornly remained shut.’
93We see here, significantly foreshadowed, the spirit of much that was to befall our Autobiographer; the historical embodiment of which, as it painfully takes shape in his Life, lies scattered, in dim disastrous details, through this Bag Pisces, and those that follow. A young man of high talent, and high though still temper, like a young mettled colt, ‘breaks-off his neck-halter,’ and bounds forth, from his peculiar manger, into the wide world; which, alas, he finds all rigorously fenced-in. Richest clover-fields tempt his eye; but to him they are forbidden pasture: either pining in progressive starvation, he must stand; or, in mad exasperation, must rush to and fro, leaping against sheer stone-walls, which he cannot leap over, which only lacerate and lame him; till at last, after thousand attempts and endurances, he, as if by miracle, clears his way; not indeed into luxuriant and luxurious clover, yet into a certain bosky wilderness where existence is still possible, and Freedom, though waited on by Scarcity, is not without sweetness. In a word, Teufelsdröckh having thrown-up his legal Profession, finds himself without landmark of outward guidance; whereby his previous want of decided Belief, or inward guidance, is frightfully aggravated. Necessity urges him on; Time will not stop, neither can he, a Son of Time; wild passions without solacement, wild faculties without employment, ever vex and agitate him. He too must enact that stern Monodrama, No Object and no Rest; must front its successive destinies, work through to its catastrophe, and deduce therefrom what moral he can.
93Here, we see the hint of what awaits our Autobiographer; the historical reality of this, which unfolds painfully in his Life, is scattered in vague, disastrous details throughout this Bag Pisces, and the ones that follow. A young man with great talent and a fiery temperament, like an untamed colt, ‘breaks free from his restraints’ and leaps from his familiar surroundings into the vast world; which, unfortunately, he finds to be harshly enclosed. Lush fields of clover catch his eye, but they remain out of reach for him: either he stands by, suffering in slow starvation, or in angry frustration, he runs back and forth, crashing into solid walls he can't overcome, which only hurt and injure him; until finally, after countless attempts and suffering, he miraculously clears a path; not into abundant and luxurious clover, but into a certain wild area where life is still possible, and Freedom, although accompanied by Scarcity, isn't without its sweetness. In short, Teufelsdröckh, having abandoned his legal career, finds himself without any external direction; thus, his previous lack of strong Belief or inner guidance becomes alarmingly worse. Necessity pushes him forward; Time won’t wait, and neither can he, as a Child of Time; wild emotions without relief, wild talents without purpose, constantly disturb and agitate him. He too must play that harsh Monodrama, No Object and no Rest; he must face its unfolding challenges, work his way to its conclusion, and draw whatever moral he can from it.
Yet let us be just to him, let us admit that his ‘neck-halter’ sat nowise easy on him; that he was in some degree forced to break it off. If we look at the young man’s civic position, in this Nameless capital, as he emerges from its Nameless University, we can discern well that it was far from enviable. His first Law-Examination he has come through triumphantly; and can even boast that the Examen Rigorosum need not have frightened him: but though he is hereby ‘an Auscultator of respectability,’ what avails it? There is next to no employment to be had. Neither, for a youth without connexions, is the process of Expectation 94very hopeful in itself; nor for one of his disposition much cheered from without. ‘My fellow Auscultators,’ he says, ‘were Auscultators: they dressed, and digested, and talked articulate words; other vitality showed they almost none. Small speculation in those eyes, that they did glare withal! Sense neither for the high nor for the deep, nor for aught human or divine, save only for the faintest scent of coming Preferment.’ In which words, indicating a total estrangement on the part of Teufelsdröckh, may there not also lurk traces of a bitterness as from wounded vanity? Doubtless these prosaic Auscultators may have sniffed at him, with his strange ways; and tried to hate, and what was much more impossible, to despise him. Friendly communion, in any case, there could not be: already has the young Teufelsdröckh left the other young geese; and swims apart, though as yet uncertain whether he himself is cygnet or gosling.
Yet let’s be fair to him; let’s acknowledge that his ‘neck-halter’ didn’t fit him well at all, and that he was somewhat pressured to break free from it. If we consider the young man’s standing in this unnamed capital as he graduates from its unnamed university, it’s clear that his situation was far from enviable. He passed his first law exam with flying colors and can even boast that the Examen Rigorosum didn’t intimidate him: but even though he is now ‘an Auscultator of respectability,’ what good does it do him? There is hardly any work available. For a young man without connections, the waiting game is not very promising, nor is he encouraged much from the outside. “My fellow Auscultators,” he remarks, “were indeed Auscultators; they dressed up, analyzed, and spoke in articulate terms; they showed almost no other signs of life. There’s a lack of ambition in their eyes, which they glare with! No sense for the lofty or the profound, nor for anything human or divine, except for the faintest whiff of potential advancement.” In these words, reflecting a complete disconnect from those around him, could there also be hints of bitterness due to hurt pride? Surely these mundane Auscultators might have looked down on him for his eccentric ways; they tried to hate him, and what was even harder, to look down on him. In any case, there was no chance for friendly connections; young Teufelsdröckh had already distanced himself from the other young ducks, and he swims alone, still unsure whether he is a swan or a gosling.
Perhaps, too, what little employment he had was performed ill, at best unpleasantly. ‘Great practical method and expertness’ he may brag of; but is there not also great practical pride, though deep-hidden, only the deeper-seated? So shy a man can never have been popular. We figure to ourselves, how in those days he may have played strange freaks with his independence, and so forth: do not his own words betoken as much? ‘Like a very young person, I imagined it was with Work alone, and not also with Folly and Sin, in myself and others, that I had been appointed to struggle.’ Be this as it may, his progress from the passive Auscultatorship, towards any active Assessorship, is evidently of the slowest. By degrees, those same established men, once partially inclined to patronise him, seem to withdraw their countenance, and give him up as ‘a man of genius’: against which procedure he, in these Papers, loudly protests. ‘As if,’ says he, ‘the higher did not presuppose the lower; as if he who can fly into heaven, could not also walk post if he resolved on it! But the world is an old woman, and mistakes any gilt farthing for a gold coin; whereby being often cheated, she will thenceforth trust nothing but the common copper.’
Perhaps, too, the little work he managed to do was carried out poorly, at best unpleasantly. He might boast about his "great practical method and skill," but isn't there also great practical pride, though well-hidden and even deeper? A man this shy could never have been popular. We can picture how in those days he might have acted strangely out of a sense of independence, and doesn't his own wording suggest as much? "Like a very young person, I thought it was only with work, and not also with foolishness and sin, in myself and others, that I was meant to struggle." However that may be, his move from being a passive observer to any active role is clearly very slow. Gradually, those established individuals who once seemed inclined to support him start to pull back and abandon him as "a man of genius," against which he passionately protests in these writings. "As if," he says, "the higher doesn't assume the lower; as if someone who can soar to heaven can't also walk if he decides to! But the world is like an old woman, mistaking any shiny penny for a gold coin; thus, often deceived, she will only trust the ordinary copper."
95How our winged sky-messenger, unaccepted as a terrestrial runner, contrived, in the mean while, to keep himself from flying skyward without return, is not too clear from these Documents. Good old Gretchen seems to have vanished from the scene, perhaps from the Earth; other Horn of Plenty, or even of Parsimony, nowhere flows for him; so that ‘the prompt nature of Hunger being well known,’ we are not without our anxiety. From private Tuition, in never so many languages and sciences, the aid derivable is small; neither, to use his own words, ‘does the young Adventurer hitherto suspect in himself any literary gift; but at best earns bread-and-water wages, by his wide faculty of Translation. Nevertheless,’ continues he, ‘that I subsisted is clear, for you find me even now alive.’ Which fact, however, except upon the principle of our true-hearted, kind old Proverb, that ‘there is always life for a living one,’ we must profess ourselves unable to explain.
95How our winged messenger, not accepted as a runner on land, managed to avoid flying away forever isn't entirely clear from these documents. Good old Gretchen seems to have disappeared from sight, maybe even from the world; there’s no new source of abundance for him anywhere; so, understanding that "the quick nature of hunger is well known," we can’t help but feel anxious. Despite private tutoring in countless languages and sciences, the help he’s gotten is minimal; nor, to use his own words, “does the young adventurer suspect he has any literary talent; he mostly earns just enough to eat, relying on his extensive translation skills. Still,” he adds, “the fact that I survived is evident, because here I am, still alive.” However, aside from the principle behind our old saying that “there’s always life for the living,” we find ourselves unable to explain this fact.
Certain Landlords’ Bills, and other economic Documents, bearing the mark of Settlement, indicate that he was not without money; but, like an independent Hearth-holder, if not House-holder, paid his way. Here also occur, among many others, two little mutilated Notes, which perhaps throw light on his condition. The first has now no date, or writer’s name, but a huge Blot; and runs to this effect: ‘The (Inkblot), tied-down by previous promise, cannot, except by best wishes, forward the Herr Teufelsdröckh’s views on the Assessorship in question; and sees himself under the cruel necessity of forbearing, for the present, what were otherwise his duty and joy, to assist in opening the career for a man of genius, on whom far higher triumphs are yet waiting.’ The other is on gilt paper; and interests us like a sort of epistolary mummy now dead, yet which once lived and beneficently worked. We give it in the original: ‘Herr Teufelsdröckh wird von der Frau Gräfinn, auf Donnerstag, zum Æsthetischen Thee schönstens eingeladen.’
Certain landlords' bills and other economic documents, marked with a seal of settlement, show that he wasn't short on cash; but, like an independent homeowner, if not a householder, he paid his way. Here, too, there are, among many others, two small damaged notes that might shed light on his situation. The first has no date or writer's name, just a large blot, and says: ‘The (Inkblot), constrained by a prior promise, cannot, except by best wishes, promote Herr Teufelsdröckh’s interests regarding the position in question; and finds himself in the unfortunate position of having to refrain, for now, from what would otherwise be his duty and delight, to help open the path for a man of genius, who is destined for much greater achievements.’ The other note is on gilded paper and interests us like a sort of lettered mummy that's now dead but once lived and did good works. We present it in the original: ‘Herr Teufelsdröckh wird von der Frau Gräfinn, auf Donnerstag, zum Aesthetic Tea schönstens eingeladen.’
Thus, in answer to a cry for solid pudding, whereof there is the most urgent need, comes, epigrammatically enough, the invitation to a wash of quite fluid 96Æsthetic Tea! How Teufelsdröckh, now at actual handgrips with Destiny herself, may have comported himself among these Musical and Literary Dilettanti of both sexes, like a hungry lion invited to a feast of chickenweed, we can only conjecture. Perhaps in expressive silence, and abstinence: otherwise if the lion, in such case, is to feast at all, it cannot be on the chickenweed, but only on the chickens. For the rest, as this Frau Gräfinn dates from the Zähdarm House, she can be no other than the Countess and mistress of the same; whose intellectual tendencies, and good-will to Teufelsdröckh, whether on the footing of Herr Towgood, or on his own footing, are hereby manifest. That some sort of relation, indeed, continued, for a time, to connect our Autobiographer, though perhaps feebly enough, with this noble House, we have elsewhere express evidence. Doubtless, if he expected patronage, it was in vain; enough for him if he here obtained occasional glimpses of the great world, from which we at one time fancied him to have been always excluded. ‘The Zähdarms,’ says he, ‘lived in the soft, sumptuous garniture of Aristocracy; whereto Literature and Art, attracted and attached from without, were to serve as the handsomest fringing. It was to the Gnädigen Frau (her Ladyship) that this latter improvement was due: assiduously she gathered, dextrously she fitted-on, what fringing was to be had; lace or cobweb, as the place yielded.’ Was Teufelsdröckh also a fringe, of lace or cobweb; or promising to be such? ‘With his Excellenz (the Count),’ continues he, ‘I have more than once had the honour to converse; chiefly on general affairs, and the aspect of the world, which he, though now past middle life, viewed in no unfavourable light; finding indeed, except the Outrooting of Journalism (die auszurottende Journalistik), little to desiderate therein. On some points, as his Excellenz was not uncholeric, I found it more pleasant to keep silence. Besides, his occupation being that of Owning Land, there might be faculties enough, which, as superfluous for such use, were little developed in him.’
Thus, in response to a call for some real substance, where there's a pressing need, comes, quite ironically, the invitation to a wash of totally fluid 96Æsthetic Tea! We can only imagine how Teufelsdröckh, now actually grappling with Destiny herself, carried himself among these Musical and Literary Dilettantes of both genders, like a hungry lion invited to feast on chickenweed. Perhaps he remained expressively silent and abstained; otherwise, if the lion is to feast at all, it can’t be on chickenweed, but only on chickens. As for the rest, since this Frau Gräfinn is from the Zähdarm House, she can only be the Countess and mistress of the same; her intellectual tendencies and goodwill towards Teufelsdröckh, whether on formal terms or his own, are clear. That some sort of connection, indeed, continued for a while to link our Autobiographer, though perhaps in a weak way, with this noble House, we have clear evidence elsewhere. Doubtless, if he was hoping for patronage, it was in vain; it was enough for him to catch occasional glimpses of the grand world, from which we once thought he was always excluded. ‘The Zähdarms,’ he says, ‘lived in the soft, luxurious trappings of Aristocracy; to which Literature and Art, drawn in from the outside, were to serve as the most attractive embellishment. This latter touch came from the Gnädigen Frau (her Ladyship): she diligently gathered and skillfully applied whatever embellishments could be found; lace or cobweb, as the occasion allowed.’ Was Teufelsdröckh also an embellishment, of lace or cobweb; or promising to be one? ‘With his Excellenz (the Count),’ he goes on, ‘I have had the honor to converse more than once; mainly about general matters and the state of the world, which he, though now past middle age, viewed rather positively; finding indeed, except for the Outrooting of Journalism (die auszurottende Journalistik), little to complain about. On some points, as he was somewhat hot-tempered, I found it easier to stay silent. Besides, since his work involved Owning Land, there might be enough skills that, being unnecessary for such a role, were little developed in him.’
That to Teufelsdröckh the aspect of the world was nowise so faultless, and many things besides ‘the Outrooting of Journalism’ might have seemed improvements, 97we can readily conjecture. With nothing but a barren Auscultatorship from without, and so many mutinous thoughts and wishes from within, his position was no easy one. ‘The Universe,’ he says, ‘was as a mighty Sphinx-riddle, which I knew so little of, yet must rede, or be devoured. In red streaks of unspeakable grandeur, yet also in the blackness of darkness, was Life, to my too-unfurnished Thought, unfolding itself. A strange contradiction lay in me; and I as yet knew not the solution of it; knew not that spiritual music can spring only from discords set in harmony; that but for Evil there were no Good, as victory is only possible by battle.’
To Teufelsdröckh, the world definitely wasn’t perfect, and there were many things beyond ‘the Outrooting of Journalism’ that might have seemed like improvements, 97 we can easily guess. With only a barren external observation and a flood of rebellious thoughts and desires from within, his situation was quite challenging. ‘The Universe,’ he says, ‘was like a massive Sphinx-riddle, which I understood so little of, yet had to solve or be consumed. In vibrant streaks of indescribable greatness, yet also in the pitch of darkness, Life unfolded itself to my underprepared mind. A strange contradiction existed within me; and I still didn’t know the answer to it; didn’t realize that spiritual harmony can only arise from discord; that without Evil, there would be no Good, just as victory is only achieved through struggle.’
‘I have heard affirmed (surely in jest),’ observes he elsewhere, ‘by not unphilanthropic persons, that it were a real increase of human happiness, could all young men from the age of nineteen be covered under barrels, or rendered otherwise invisible; and there left to follow their lawful studies and callings, till they emerged, sadder and wiser, at the age of twenty-five. With which suggestion, at least as considered in the light of a practical scheme, I need scarcely say that I nowise coincide. Nevertheless it is plausibly urged that, as young ladies (Mädchen) are, to mankind, precisely the most delightful in those years; so young gentlemen (Bübchen) do then attain their maximum of detestability. Such gawks (Gecken) are they; and foolish peacocks, and yet with such a vulturous hunger for self-indulgence; so obstinate, obstreperous, vainglorious; in all senses, so froward and so forward. No mortal’s endeavour or attainment will, in the smallest, content the as yet unendeavouring, unattaining young gentleman; but he could make it all infinitely better, were it worthy of him. Life everywhere is the most manageable matter, simple as a question in the Rule-of-Three: multiply your second and third term together, divide the product by the first, and your quotient will be the answer,—which you are but an ass if you cannot come at. The booby has not yet found-out, by any trial, that, do what one will, there is ever a cursed fraction, oftenest a decimal repeater, and no net integer quotient so much as to be thought of.’
"I’ve heard people say (probably jokingly)," he remarks elsewhere, "that it would really boost human happiness if all young men from the age of nineteen could be hidden away under barrels or made otherwise invisible, allowing them to focus on their studies and jobs until they come out at twenty-five, a bit sadder and a lot wiser. I hardly need to say that I don’t agree with that idea as a practical plan. Still, it’s been convincingly argued that just as young women are most charming at that age, young men hit their peak of being unbearable. They are such clumsy fools, foolish peacocks, yet they have this insatiable hunger for pleasure; so stubborn, noisy, and full of themselves; in every way, they are both difficult and overly eager. No amount of effort or accomplishment will satisfy the young man who hasn’t even tried to achieve anything; he believes he could make everything infinitely better, if only it were up to him. Life is actually super simple, like solving a problem in basic math: multiply your second and third numbers together, divide that product by the first number, and you’ll get the answer—which, if you can’t figure that out, you must really be missing something. The fool hasn’t realized yet, through any experience, that no matter what you do, there’s always a pesky fraction, often a repeating decimal, and not even a single whole number answer worth considering."
In which passage does not there lie an implied confession 98that Teufelsdröckh himself, besides his outward obstructions, had an inward, still greater, to contend with; namely, a certain temporary, youthful, yet still afflictive derangement of head? Alas, on the former side alone, his case was hard enough. ‘It continues ever true,’ says he, ‘that Saturn, or Chronos, or what we call Time, devours all his Children: only by incessant Running, by incessant Working, may you (for some threescore-and-ten years) escape him; and you too he devours at last. Can any Sovereign, or Holy Alliance of Sovereigns, bid Time stand still; even in thought, shake themselves free of Time? Our whole terrestrial being is based on Time, and built of Time; it is wholly a Movement, a Time-impulse; Time is the author of it, the material of it. Hence also our Whole Duty, which is to move, to work,—in the right direction. Are not our Bodies and our Souls in continual movement, whether we will or not; in a continual Waste, requiring a continual Repair? Utmost satisfaction of our whole outward and inward Wants were but satisfaction for a space of Time; thus, whatso we have done, is done, and for us annihilated, and ever must we go and do anew. O Time-Spirit, how hast thou environed and imprisoned us, and sunk us so deep in thy troublous dim Time-Element, that only in lucid moments can so much as glimpses of our upper Azure Home be revealed to us! Me, however, as a Son of Time, unhappier than some others, was Time threatening to eat quite prematurely; for, strive as I might, there was no good Running, so obstructed was the path, so gyved were the feet.’ That is to say, we presume, speaking in the dialect of this lower world, that Teufelsdröckh’s whole duty and necessity was, like other men’s, ‘to work,—in the right direction,’ and that no work was to be had; whereby he became wretched enough. As was natural: with haggard Scarcity threatening him in the distance; and so vehement a soul languishing in restless inaction, and forced thereby, like Sir Hudibras’s sword by rust,
In which section is there not an implied admission that Teufelsdröckh himself, aside from his external challenges, faced an even greater internal struggle; specifically, a certain temporary, youthful, yet still painful mental disturbance? Unfortunately, concerning the external, his situation was already tough enough. "It remains true," he says, "that Saturn, or Chronos, or what we call Time, devours all his Children: only through constant Running, by constant Working, can you (for about seventy years) escape him; and even you will ultimately be consumed by him. Can any Ruler, or Holy Alliance of Rulers, command Time to stand still; can they even free themselves mentally from Time? Our entire earthly existence is grounded in Time, constructed from Time; it is entirely a Movement, a Time-driven force; Time is both the creator and the material of it. Therefore, our whole Duty is to move, to work—in the right direction. Aren't our Bodies and our Souls in constant motion, whether we want to be or not; in a continual Depletion, requiring ongoing Restoration? The ultimate fulfillment of all our external and internal Needs would only provide satisfaction for a limited period; thus, whatever we have accomplished is done, and for us erased, and we must continually go and do anew. O Time-Spirit, how have you surrounded and trapped us, plunging us so deep into your troubled, murky Time-Element that we can only catch glimpses of our bright Azure Home in fleeting, clear moments! As for me, as a Son of Time, more unfortunate than others, Time was threatening to consume me far too soon; for, no matter how hard I tried, there was no effective Running, the path was so blocked, my feet were so shackled." That is to say, we assume, speaking in the language of this lower world, that Teufelsdröckh’s whole duty and necessity was, like other men’s, "to work—in the right direction," and that no work was available; as a result, he became sufficiently miserable. Naturally: with gaunt Scarcity looming in the distance; and such a passionate soul wasting away in restless inactivity, forced to suffer, like Sir Hudibras’s sword from rust,
To eat into itself for lack
To consume itself due to a lack
Of something else to hew and hack!
Of something else to cut and chop!
But on the whole, that same ‘excellent Passivity,’ 99as it has all along done, is here again vigorously flourishing; in which circumstance may we not trace the beginnings of much that now characterises our Professor; and perhaps, in faint rudiments, the origin of the Clothes-Philosophy itself? Already the attitude he has assumed towards the World is too defensive; not, as would have been desirable, a bold attitude of attack. ‘So far hitherto,’ he says, ‘as I had mingled with mankind, I was notable, if for anything, for a certain stillness of manner, which, as my friends often rebukingly declared, did but ill express the keen ardour of my feelings. I, in truth, regarded men with an excess both of love and of fear. The mystery of a Person, indeed, is ever divine to him that has a sense for the God-like. Often, notwithstanding, was I blamed, and by half-strangers hated, for my so-called Hardness (Härte), my Indifferentism towards men; and the seemingly ironic tone I had adopted, as my favourite dialect in conversation. Alas, the panoply of Sarcasm was but as a buckram case, wherein I had striven to envelop myself; that so my own poor Person might live safe there, and in all friendliness, being no longer exasperated by wounds. Sarcasm I now see to be, in general, the language of the Devil; for which reason I have long since as good as renounced it. But how many individuals did I, in those days, provoke into some degree of hostility thereby! An ironic man, with his sly stillness, and ambuscading ways, more especially an ironic young man, from whom it is least expected, may be viewed as a pest to society. Have we not seen persons of weight and name coming forward, with gentlest indifference, to tread such a one out of sight, as an insignificancy and worm, start ceiling-high (balkenhoch), and thence fall shattered and supine, to be borne home on shutters, not without indignation, when he proved electric and a torpedo!’
But overall, that same 'excellent Passivity,' 99as it has always done, is once again thriving here; in this, we might find the roots of much that now defines our Professor; and perhaps, in subtle ways, the beginnings of the Clothes-Philosophy itself? The way he has positioned himself towards the world feels too defensive; it lacks the bold approach of attack that would have been preferable. 'Up until now,’ he says, ‘as I interacted with people, I was notable, if for anything, for a certain stillness in my demeanor, which, as my friends often pointed out, poorly represented the intense passion of my feelings. I truly viewed people with a mix of both love and fear. The mystery of a person is always divine to someone who senses the God-like. Still, I was frequently criticized, and even disliked by acquaintances, for my so-called hardness (Härte), my indifference towards others; and the somewhat ironic tone I had adopted as my preferred way of speaking. Unfortunately, the armor of sarcasm was merely a protective shell I tried to wrap myself in; it was a way for my own fragile self to survive, unfazed by wounds and in friendly company. I now realize that sarcasm is, in general, the language of the Devil; for that reason, I have all but abandoned it. But how many people did I provoke into some level of hostility back then! An ironic person, with his sly calmness and sneaky ways, particularly a young ironic man, who is least expected to be so, can be seen as a nuisance to society. Haven’t we witnessed respected individuals, with gentle indifference, trying to dismiss such a one as insignificant and worthless, only to see him rise dramatically (balkenhoch), and then crash down shattered and defeated, to be taken home on a stretcher, not without frustration, when he turned out to be electrifying and explosive!'
Alas, how can a man with this devilishness of temper make way for himself in Life; where the first problem, as Teufelsdröckh too admits, is ‘to unite yourself with some one and with somewhat (sich anzuschliessen)’? Division, not union, is written on most part of his procedure. Let us add too that, in no great length of 100time, the only important connexion he had ever succeeded in forming, his connexion with the Zähdarm Family, seems to have been paralysed, for all practical uses, by the death of the ‘not uncholeric’ old Count. This fact stands recorded, quite incidentally, in a certain Discourse on Epitaphs, huddled into the present Bag, among so much else; of which Essay the learning and curious penetration are more to be approved of than the spirit. His grand principle is, that lapidary inscriptions, of what sort soever, should be Historical rather than Lyrical. ‘By request of that worthy Nobleman’s survivors,’ says he, ‘I undertook to compose his Epitaph; and not unmindful of my own rules, produced the following; which however, for an alleged defect of Latinity, a defect never yet fully visible to myself, still remains unengraven’;—wherein, we may predict, there is more than the Latinity that will surprise an English reader:
Unfortunately, how can a guy with such a nasty temper make his way in life when, as Teufelsdröckh admits, the first challenge is "to connect with someone and something"? Division, not unity, defines most of his actions. Additionally, it's worth noting that, not too long ago, the only significant connection he managed to form, his relationship with the Zähdarm Family, seems to have been rendered useless due to the death of the "not-so-choleric" old Count. This fact is mentioned somewhat casually in a certain Discourse on Epitaphs, thrown into the current collection along with much else; the essay's knowledge and sharp insights are more commendable than its spirit. His main principle is that any kind of inscription should be Historical instead of Lyrical. "At the request of that worthy Nobleman’s survivors," he says, "I took it upon myself to write his Epitaph; and keeping my own rules in mind, I came up with the following; however, it still remains unengraved due to an alleged flaw in my Latin—a flaw that I've never fully seen myself";—where we can predict, more than just the Latin will surprise an English reader:
HIC JACET
Here lies
PHILIPPUS ZAEHDARM, COGNOMINE MAGNUS,
PHILIPPUS ZAEHDARM, THE GREAT,
ZAEHDARMI COMES,
EX IMPERII CONCILIO,
VELLERIS AUREI, PERISCELIDIS, NECNON VULTURIS NIGRI
EQUES.
ZAEHDARMI ARRIVES,
FROM THE COUNCIL OF THE EMPIRE,
WIELDING A GOLDEN SHIELD, WITH ARMOR ON HIS LEGS, AND ALSO A BLACK VULTURE
KNight.
QUI DUM SUB LUNA AGEBAT,
While living under the moon,
QUINQUIES MILLE PERDICES
Five Thousand Partridges
PLUMBO CONFECIT:
Lead made.
VARII CIBI
Various Foods
CENTUMPONDIA MILLIES CENTENA MILLIA,
PER SE, PERQUE SERVOS QUADRUPEDES BIPEDESVE
HAUD SINE TUMULTU DEVOLVENS,
CENTUMPONDIA MILLIES CENTENA MILLIA,
PER SE, PERQUE SERVOS QUADRUPEDES BIPEDESVE
HAUD SINE TUMULTU DEVOLVENS,
IN STERCUS
IN STERCUS
PALAM CONVERTIT.
PALAM CONVERTS.
NUNC A LABORE REQUIESCENTEM
OPERA SEQUUNTUR.
NOW TO REST FROM WORK
DEEDS FOLLOW.
SI MONUMENTUM QUÆRIS,
FIMETUM ADSPICE.
IF YOU SEEK A MONUMENT,
LOOK AT THE FECES.
PRIMUM IN ORBE DEJECIT [sub dato]; POSTREMUM [sub dato].
PRIMUM IN ORBE DEJECIT [sub dato]; POSTREMUM [sub dato].
CHAPTER V
CHAPTER 5
ROMANCE
‘For long years,’ writes Teufelsdröckh, ‘had the poor Hebrew, in this Egypt of an Auscultatorship, painfully toiled, baking bricks without stubble, before ever the question once struck him with entire force: For what?—Beym Himmel! For Food and Warmth! And are Food and Warmth nowhere else, in the whole wide Universe, discoverable?—Come of it what might, I resolved to try.’
‘For many years,’ writes Teufelsdröckh, ‘the poor Hebrew, in this bleak environment of an Auscultatorship, had worked hard, making bricks without straw, before the question finally hit him with full force: For what?—Oh my God! For Food and Warmth! And is Food and Warmth not available anywhere else in this vast Universe?—Whatever may come of it, I decided to give it a shot.’
Thus then are we to see him in a new independent capacity, though perhaps far from an improved one. Teufelsdröckh is now a man without Profession. Quitting the common Fleet of herring-busses and whalers, where indeed his leeward, laggard condition was painful enough, he desperately steers-off, on a course of his own, by sextant and compass of his own. Unhappy Teufelsdröckh! Though neither Fleet, nor Traffic, nor Commodores pleased thee, still was it not a Fleet, sailing in prescribed track, for fixed objects; above all, in combination, wherein, by mutual guidance, by all manner of loans and borrowings, each could manifoldly aid the other? How wilt thou sail in unknown seas; and for thyself find that shorter North-west Passage to thy fair Spice-country of a Nowhere?—A solitary rover, on such a voyage, with such nautical tactics, will meet with adventures. Nay, as we forthwith discover, a certain Calypso-Island detains him at the very outset; and as it were falsifies and oversets his whole reckoning.
So now we see him in a new, independent role, although it might not be any better. Teufelsdröckh is now a man without a job. Leaving behind the typical fleet of fishing boats and whaling ships, where his lazy and unproductive situation was quite painful, he desperately sets off on a path of his own, using his own sextant and compass. Unhappy Teufelsdröckh! Even though neither fleet, trade, nor captains appealed to you, wasn't it still a *Fleet*, sailing along a defined route towards clear goals? More importantly, it involved teamwork, where everyone could support each other through shared resources and assistance. How will you navigate through uncharted waters and find a shorter Northwest Passage to your imaginary Spice-land of Nowhere?—As a lonely wanderer on such a journey, using these kinds of sailing strategies, you're bound to have adventures. In fact, as we quickly find out, a certain Calypso Island traps him right at the beginning and completely derails his plans.
‘If in youth,’ writes he once, ‘the Universe is majestically unveiling, and everywhere Heaven revealing itself on Earth, nowhere to the Young Man does this Heaven on Earth so immediately reveal itself as in the Young Maiden. Strangely enough, in this strange life of ours, it has been so appointed. On the whole, as I have often said, a Person (Persönlichkeit) is ever holy to us: a certain orthodox Anthropomorphism connects my Me with all Thees in bonds of Love: but it is in this approximation of the Like and Unlike, that such 102heavenly attraction, as between Negative and Positive, first burns-out into a flame. Is the pitifullest mortal Person, think you, indifferent to us? Is it not rather our heartfelt wish to be made one with him; to unite him to us, by gratitude, by admiration, even by fear; or failing all these, unite ourselves to him? But how much more, in this case of the Like-Unlike! Here is conceded us the higher mystic possibility of such a union, the highest in our Earth; thus, in the conducting medium of Fantasy, flames-forth that fire-development of the universal Spiritual Electricity, which, as unfolded between man and woman, we first emphatically denominate Love.
‘If in youth,’ he writes, ‘the Universe is unfolding majestically, and everywhere Heaven is revealing itself on Earth, nowhere does this Heaven on Earth become so clear to the Young Man as in the Young Maiden. Strangely enough, in this unusual life of ours, it has been set up this way. Overall, as I have often said, a Person is always sacred to us: a certain traditional perspective connects my self with all others in bonds of Love: but it is in this connection of the Similar and Dissimilar that such heavenly attraction, like between Negative and Positive, first ignites into a flame. Do you think the most pitiable mortal is indifferent to us? Isn’t it rather our genuine desire to become one with him; to unite him with us through gratitude, admiration, even fear; or failing all that, to join ourselves to him? But how much more in the case of the Similar-Dissimilar! Here we have the higher mystical possibility of such a union, the highest on our Earth; thus, through the medium of Fantasy, bursts forth that fire development of the universal Spiritual Electricity, which, as it unfolds between man and woman, we first strongly call Love.
‘In every well-conditioned stripling, as I conjecture, there already blooms a certain prospective Paradise, cheered by some fairest Eve; nor, in the stately vistas, and flowerage and foliage of that Garden, is a Tree of Knowledge, beautiful and awful in the midst thereof, wanting. Perhaps too the whole is but the lovelier, if Cherubim and a Flaming Sword divide it from all footsteps of men; and grant him, the imaginative stripling, only the view, not the entrance. Happy season of virtuous youth, when shame is still an impassable celestial barrier; and the sacred air-cities of Hope have not shrunk into the mean clay-hamlets of Reality; and man, by his nature, is yet infinite and free!
‘In every well-rounded young person, as I imagine, there’s already a glimpse of a potential Paradise, brightened by some beautiful Eve; and within the grand views, and blooming flowers and leaves of that Garden, a Tree of Knowledge, stunning and terrifying in the midst, is present. Maybe the whole scene is just more beautiful, if Cherubim and a Flaming Sword keep it from all human footsteps; and give him, the creative young person, only the sight, not the entry. Happy time of virtuous youth, when shame is still an unbreakable heavenly barrier; and the sacred cities of Hope haven’t shrunk into the simple dirt towns of Reality; and man, by his nature, is still infinite and free!
‘As for our young Forlorn,’ continues Teufelsdröckh, evidently meaning himself, ‘in his secluded way of life, and with his glowing Fantasy, the more fiery that it burnt under cover, as in a reverberating furnace, his feeling towards the Queens of this Earth was, and indeed is, altogether unspeakable. A visible Divinity dwelt in them; to our young Friend all women were holy, were heavenly. As yet he but saw them flitting past, in their many-coloured angel-plumage; or hovering mute and inaccessible on the outskirts of Æsthetic Tea: all of air they were, all Soul and Form; so lovely, like mysterious priestesses, in whose hand was the invisible Jacob’s-ladder, whereby man might mount into very Heaven. That he, our poor Friend, should ever win for himself one of these Gracefuls (Holden)—Ach Gott! how could he hope it; should he 103not have died under it? There was a certain delirious vertigo in the thought.
‘As for our young Forlorn,’ continues Teufelsdröckh, evidently referring to himself, ‘in his isolated way of life, and with his vivid imagination, which burned even more intensely when hidden, like in a furnace, his feelings toward the Queens of this Earth were, and still are, completely indescribable. A visible divinity resided in them; to our young Friend, all women were sacred, were celestial. He only saw them flitting by in their colorful angelic attire or hovering silently and unattainably at the edge of Æsthetic Tea: they were all air, all spirit and form; so beautiful, like mysterious priestesses, holding the invisible Jacob’s ladder by which man might ascend to heaven. That he, our poor Friend, could ever win one of these Graces (Holden)—Oh God! how could he even hope for that; should he not have perished from it? There was a certain ecstatic dizziness in that thought.
‘Thus was the young man, if all-sceptical of Demons and Angels such as the vulgar had once believed in, nevertheless not unvisited by hosts of true Sky-born, who visibly and audibly hovered round him whereso he went; and they had that religious worship in his thought, though as yet it was by their mere earthly and trivial name that he named them. But now, if on a soul so circumstanced, some actual Air-maiden, incorporated into tangibility and reality, should cast any electric glance of kind eyes, saying thereby, “Thou too mayest love and be loved”; and so kindle him,—good Heaven, what a volcanic, earthquake-bringing, all-consuming fire were probably kindled!’
‘So, the young man, while completely skeptical of the Demons and Angels that most people used to believe in, was still surrounded by true Sky-born beings who visibly and audibly hovered around him wherever he went. They had a kind of religious reverence in his thoughts, even though he only referred to them by their mundane and trivial names. But now, if a real Air-maiden should cast a kind glance at him, saying, “You too can love and be loved,” and ignite something within him—good heavens, what a volcanic, earth-shattering, all-consuming fire would likely be set off!’
Such a fire, it afterwards appears, did actually burst-forth, with explosions more or less Vesuvian, in the inner man of Herr Diogenes; as indeed how could it fail? A nature, which, in his own figurative style, we might say, had now not a little carbonised tinder, of Irritability; with so much nitre of latent Passion, and sulphurous Humour enough; the whole lying in such hot neighbourhood, close by ‘a reverberating furnace of Fantasy’: have we not here the components of driest Gunpowder, ready, on occasion of the smallest spark, to blaze-up? Neither, in this our Life-element, are sparks anywhere wanting. Without doubt, some Angel, whereof so many hovered round, would one day, leaving ‘the outskirts of Æsthetic Tea,’ flit nigher; and, by electric Promethean glance, kindle no despicable firework. Happy, if it indeed proved a Firework, and flamed-off rocketwise, in successive beautiful bursts of splendour, each growing naturally from the other, through the several stages of a happy Youthful Love; till the whole were safely burnt-out; and the young soul relieved with little damage! Happy, if it did not rather prove a Conflagration and mad Explosion; painfully lacerating the heart itself; nay perhaps bursting the heart in pieces (which were Death); or at best, bursting the thin walls of your ‘reverberating furnace,’ so that it rage thenceforth all unchecked among the contiguous combustibles (which were Madness): till 104of the so fair and manifold internal world of our Diogenes, there remained Nothing, or only the ‘crater of an extinct volcano!’
Such a fire, it later turns out, actually erupted, with explosions that were somewhat like a volcano, in the inner being of Herr Diogenes; how could it not? A nature that, in his own creative way, we might say, had quite a bit of combustible irritability; with plenty of hidden passion and enough sulky humor; all lying in such a hot area, close by ‘a furnace of imagination’: don’t we have here the ingredients of the driest gunpowder, ready to ignite at the slightest spark? Moreover, in this element of our life, sparks are certainly not lacking. Without a doubt, some angel, of which so many hovered around, would one day, leaving ‘the outskirts of Æsthetic Tea,’ draw closer; and, with a jolt of electric inspiration, set off quite an impressive display. Happy, if it indeed turned out to be a firework, bursting forth like rockets, in successive beautiful displays of splendor, each naturally leading to the next, through the various stages of a joyous youthful love; until everything was safely burned out; and the young soul was left with little harm! Happy, if it didn’t instead turn into a raging inferno and wild explosion; painfully tearing apart the heart itself; or perhaps splitting the heart into pieces (which would be death); or at best, breaking through the thin walls of your ‘furnace of imagination,’ so that it raged uncontrollably among the nearby flammable materials (which would lead to madness): until 104 of the beautiful and varied inner world of our Diogenes, there remained nothing, or only the ‘crater of an extinct volcano!’
From multifarious Documents in this Bag Capricornus, and in the adjacent ones on both sides thereof, it becomes manifest that our philosopher, as stoical and cynical as he now looks, was heartily and even frantically in Love: here therefore may our old doubts whether his heart were of stone or of flesh give way. He loved once; not wisely but too well. And once only: for as your Congreve needs a new case or wrappage for every new rocket, so each human heart can properly exhibit but one Love, if even one; the ‘First Love which is infinite’ can be followed by no second like unto it. In more recent years, accordingly, the Editor of these Sheets was led to regard Teufelsdröckh as a man not only who would never wed, but who would never even flirt; whom the grand-climacteric itself, and St. Martin’s Summer of incipient Dotage, would crown with no new myrtle-garland. To the Professor, women are henceforth Pieces of Art; of Celestial Art, indeed; which celestial pieces he glories to survey in galleries, but has lost thought of purchasing.
From various documents in this bag Capricornus, and in the nearby ones on either side, it becomes clear that our philosopher, as stoic and cynical as he appears now, was deeply and even desperately in love: here, therefore, our old doubts about whether his heart was made of stone or flesh can give way. He loved once; not wisely, but too well. And only once: just as your Congreve needs a new case or wrapping for every new rocket, each human heart can truly only show one love, if it can even show one at all; the ‘First Love, which is infinite,’ cannot be matched by any second like it. In more recent years, the editor of these sheets came to see Teufelsdröckh as a man who would not only never marry, but who would not even flirt; that even the grand turning point of life and St. Martin’s Summer of approaching old age would not crown him with a new myrtle garland. To the Professor, women are henceforth pieces of art; of celestial art, indeed; which celestial pieces he enjoys observing in galleries but has lost the desire to acquire.
Psychological readers are not without curiosity to see how Teufelsdröckh, in this for him unexampled predicament, demeans himself; with what specialties of successive configuration, splendour and colour, his Firework blazes-off. Small, as usual, is the satisfaction that such can meet with here. From amid these confused masses of Eulogy and Elegy, with their mad Petrarchan and Werterean ware lying madly scattered among all sorts of quite extraneous matter, not so much as the fair one’s name can be deciphered. For, without doubt, the title Blumine, whereby she is here designated, and which means simply Goddess of Flowers, must be fictitious. Was her real name Flora, then? But what was her surname, or had she none? Of what station in Life was she; of what parentage, fortune, aspect? Specially, by what Pre-established Harmony of occurrences did the Lover and the Loved meet one another in so wide a world; how did they behave in such meeting? To all which questions, not 105unessential in a Biographic work, mere Conjecture must for most part return answer. ‘It was appointed,’ says our Philosopher, ‘that the high celestial orbit of Blumine should intersect the low sublunary one of our Forlorn; that he, looking in her empyrean eyes, should fancy the upper Sphere of Light was come down into this nether sphere of Shadows; and finding himself mistaken, make noise enough.’
Psychological readers are curious to see how Teufelsdröckh handles himself in this unprecedented situation; with what unique configurations, splendor, and colors his Firework displays. As usual, the satisfaction they find here is minimal. Among the chaotic mix of Eulogy and Elegy, where their wild Petrarchan and Werterean expressions are scattered among all kinds of unrelated content, not even the name of the fair one can be made out. Without a doubt, the title Blumine, which identifies her here and simply means Goddess of Flowers, must be fictional. Was her real name Flora? But what was her last name, or did she have none? What was her status in life, her background, her wealth, her appearance? Specifically, how did the Lover and the Loved meet in such a vast world; how did they behave during that meeting? To all these questions, which are not irrelevant in a biographical work, mere conjecture must primarily provide the answers. ‘It was destined,’ says our Philosopher, ‘that the high celestial orbit of Blumine should intersect the low sublunary one of our Forlorn; that he, gazing into her heavenly eyes, should believe the upper Sphere of Light had descended into this lower sphere of Shadows; and when he realized he was mistaken, make enough noise about it.’
We seem to gather that she was young, hazel-eyed, beautiful, and some one’s Cousin; highborn, and of high spirit; but unhappily dependent and insolvent; living, perhaps, on the not-too-gracious bounty of monied relatives. But how came ‘the Wanderer’ into her circle? Was it by the humid vehicle of Æsthetic Tea, or by the arid one of mere Business? Was it on the hand of Herr Towgood; or of the Gnädige Frau, who, as ornamental Artist, might sometimes like to promote flirtation, especially for young cynical Nondescripts? To all appearance, it was chiefly by Accident, and the grace of Nature.
It seems we can gather that she was young, with hazel eyes, beautiful, and someone’s cousin; of noble birth and spirited; but unfortunately dependent and broke; living, perhaps, on the not-so-generous support of wealthy relatives. But how did ‘the Wanderer’ end up in her circle? Was it through the moist means of Æsthetic Tea, or the dry route of plain Business? Was it thanks to Herr Towgood, or the Gnädige Frau, who, as a decorative Artist, might sometimes enjoy encouraging flirtation, especially for young cynical types? It appears it was mostly by chance and the charm of Nature.
‘Thou fair Waldschloss,’ writes our Autobiographer, ‘what stranger ever saw thee, were it even an absolved Auscultator, officially bearing in his pocket the last Relatio ex Actis he would ever write, but must have paused to wonder! Noble Mansion! There stoodest thou, in deep Mountain Amphitheatre, on umbrageous lawns, in thy serene solitude; stately, massive, all of granite; glittering in the western sunbeams, like a palace of El Dorado, overlaid with precious metal. Beautiful rose up, in wavy curvature, the slope of thy guardian Hills; of the greenest was their sward, embossed with its dark-brown frets of crag, or spotted by some spreading solitary Tree and its shadow. To the unconscious Wayfarer thou wert also as an Ammon’s Temple, in the Libyan Waste; where, for joy and woe, the tablet of his Destiny lay written. Well might he pause and gaze; in that glance of his were prophecy and nameless forebodings.’
‘You beautiful Waldschloss,’ writes our Autobiographer, ‘what stranger has ever seen you, even if a cleared Auscultator, officially carrying in his pocket the last Relatio ex Actis he would ever write, would not have paused to admire! Noble Mansion! There you stood, in a deep Mountain Amphitheatre, on shady lawns, in your peaceful solitude; stately, massive, all of granite; shining in the western sunbeams, like a palace of El Dorado, covered in precious metal. Beautifully rose, in wavy curves, the slope of your guardian Hills; the greenest was their grass, decorated with dark-brown patches of rock, or marked by some spreading solitary Tree and its shadow. To the unaware Wayfarer, you were also like an Ammon's Temple in the Libyan Waste; where, for joy and sorrow, the tablet of his Destiny was written. He could easily pause and gaze; in that glance of his were prophecy and unexplainable forebodings.’
But now let us conjecture that the so presentient Auscultator has handed-in his Relatio ex Actis; been invited to a glass of Rhine-wine; and so, instead of returning dispirited and athirst to his dusty Town-home, 106is ushered into the Gardenhouse, where sit the choicest party of dames and cavaliers: if not engaged in Æsthetic Tea, yet in trustful evening conversation, and perhaps Musical Coffee, for we hear of ‘harps and pure voices making the stillness live.’ Scarcely, it would seem, is the Gardenhouse inferior in respectability to the noble Mansion itself. ‘Embowered amid rich foliage, rose-clusters, and the hues and odours of thousand flowers, here sat that brave company; in front, from the wide-opened doors, fair outlook over blossom and bush, over grove and velvet green, stretching, undulating onwards to the remote Mountain peaks: so bright, so mild, and everywhere the melody of birds and happy creatures: it was all as if man had stolen a shelter from the Sun in the bosom-vesture of Summer herself. How came it that the Wanderer advanced thither with such forecasting heart (ahndungsvoll), by the side of his gay host? Did he feel that to these soft influences his hard bosom ought to be shut; that here, once more, Fate had it in view to try him; to mock him, and see whether there were Humour in him?
But now let’s imagine that the insightful Auscultator has submitted his Relatio ex Actis; been invited to have a glass of Rhine wine; and so, instead of going back dispirited and thirsty to his dusty townhome, 106 is welcomed into the Gardenhouse, where the finest gathering of ladies and gentlemen sit: if not engaged in Aesthetic Tea, then in friendly evening conversation, and perhaps Musical Coffee, since we hear about ‘harps and beautiful voices bringing the stillness to life.’ It seems the Gardenhouse is hardly any less respectable than the noble Mansion itself. ‘Nestled among rich foliage, rose bushes, and the colors and scents of a thousand flowers, this brave company sat; in front, from the wide-open doors, a lovely view over blooms and bushes, groves and lush greenery, stretching and undulating towards distant mountain peaks: so bright, so gentle, with the melody of birds and cheerful creatures everywhere: it was as if man had found a shelter from the Sun in the warm embrace of Summer itself. How did it come to be that the Wanderer approached with such an anticipatory heart (ahndungsvoll), alongside his cheerful host? Did he sense that he should keep his hardened heart closed to these gentle influences; that here, once again, Fate intended to test him; to mock him, and see if there was Humor in him?
‘Next moment he finds himself presented to the party; and especially by name to—Blumine! Peculiar among all dames and damosels glanced Blumine, there in her modesty, like a star among earthly lights. Noblest maiden! whom he bent to, in body and in soul; yet scarcely dared look at, for the presence filled him with painful yet sweetest embarrassment.
‘The next moment, he finds himself introduced to the party, and especially by name to—Blumine! Unique among all the ladies, Blumine shone with her modesty, like a star among earthly lights. The noblest maiden! He bowed to her, both physically and spiritually; yet he could hardly bring himself to look at her, as her presence filled him with a mix of painful yet sweet embarrassment.
‘Blumine’s was a name well known to him; far and wide was the fair one heard of, for her gifts, her graces, her caprices: from all which vague colourings of Rumour, from the censures no less than from the praises, had our friend painted for himself a certain imperious Queen of Hearts, and blooming warm Earth-angel, much more enchanting than your mere white Heaven-angels of women, in whose placid veins circulates too little naphtha-fire. Herself also he had seen in public places; that light yet so stately form; those dark tresses, shading a face where smiles and sunlight played over earnest deeps: but all this he had seen only as a magic vision, for him inaccessible, almost without reality. Her sphere was too far from his; how should 107she ever think of him; O Heaven! how should they so much as once meet together? And now that Rose-goddess sits in the same circle with him; the light of her eyes has smiled on him; if he speak, she will hear it! Nay, who knows, since the heavenly Sun looks into lowest valleys, but Blumine herself might have aforetime noted the so unnotable; perhaps, from his very gainsayers, as he had from hers, gathered wonder, gathered favour for him? Was the attraction, the agitation mutual, then; pole and pole trembling towards contact, when once brought into neighbourhood? Say rather, heart swelling in presence of the Queen of Hearts; like the Sea swelling when once near its Moon! With the Wanderer it was even so: as in heavenward gravitation, suddenly as at the touch of a Seraph’s wand, his whole soul is roused from its deepest recesses; and all that was painful and that was blissful there, dim images, vague feelings of a whole Past and a whole Future, are heaving in unquiet eddies within him.
‘Blumine was a name he knew well; far and wide, people spoke of the beautiful one for her talents, her charm, and her whims. From all the whispers of gossip, both the good and the bad, our friend had created a vision of her as a commanding Queen of Hearts, a vibrant Earth-angel, far more captivating than your typical heavenly angels, whose serene emotions have too little fire. He had also seen her in public; that light yet graceful figure, those dark locks framing a face where smiles and sunlight danced over deep thoughts. But all this he had seen only as a magical vision, nearly unattainable and almost unreal. Her world was too distant from his; how could she ever think of him? Oh Heaven! How could they even meet? And now that the Rose-goddess is in the same circle with him, the light from her eyes has smiled upon him; if he speaks, she will hear him! Who knows, since the heavenly Sun shines down into the deepest valleys, maybe Blumine had previously noticed the inconspicuous; perhaps, from his critics, as he had from hers, she gathered admiration, gathered favor for him? Was the attraction, the excitement mutual then; two poles trembling toward contact, once brought close together? Rather, it felt like his heart swelling in the presence of the Queen of Hearts, like the Sea swelling when near its Moon! It was just like that for the Wanderer: as if drawn upwards, suddenly, like at the touch of a Seraph's wand, his entire soul is stirred from the depths; and all that was painful and blissful deep inside him—faint images, vague feelings of a whole Past and a whole Future—are swirling in restless eddies within him.
‘Often, in far less agitating scenes, had our still Friend shrunk forcibly together; and shrouded-up his tremors and flutterings, of what sort soever, in a safe cover of Silence, and perhaps of seeming Stolidity. How was it, then, that here, when trembling to the core of his heart, he did not sink into swoons, but rose into strength, into fearlessness and clearness? It was his guiding Genius (Dämon) that inspired him; he must go forth and meet his Destiny. Show thyself now, whispered it, or be forever hid. Thus sometimes it is even when your anxiety becomes transcendental, that the soul first feels herself able to transcend it; that she rises above it, in fiery victory; and borne on new-found wings of victory, moves so calmly, even because so rapidly, so irresistibly. Always must the Wanderer remember, with a certain satisfaction and surprise, how in this case he sat not silent, but struck adroitly into the stream of conversation; which thenceforth, to speak with an apparent not a real vanity, he may say that he continued to lead. Surely, in those hours, a certain inspiration was imparted him, such inspiration as is still possible in our late era. The self-secluded unfolds himself in noble thoughts, in free, glowing words; his 108soul is as one sea of light, the peculiar home of Truth and Intellect; wherein also Fantasy bodies-forth form after form, radiant with all prismatic hues.’
‘Often, in much less intense situations, our still Friend had forcibly pulled himself together, hiding his tremors and anxieties under a safe cover of Silence, and perhaps a façade of calmness. How was it then, that here, when trembling to the core of his heart, he didn’t faint, but instead found strength, fearlessness, and clarity? It was his guiding spirit (Dämon) that inspired him; he had to go out and confront his Destiny. Show yourself now, it whispered, or be hidden forever. Sometimes, even when anxiety feels overwhelming, the soul first realizes it can transcend it; it rises above it, with fiery victory; and lifted on newly discovered wings, it moves so calmly, even because of its rapid, irresistible momentum. The Wanderer must always remember, with a sense of satisfaction and surprise, how he did not remain passive but deftly engaged in the conversation; from that point on, he can say with a modest pride that he continued to lead. Surely, in those moments, he received a certain inspiration, the kind that remains possible even in our modern age. The self-reflective person reveals himself in noble thoughts, in free, glowing words; his soul is like a sea of light, the unique home of Truth and Intellect; where Fantasy also brings forth form after form, radiant with all the colors of the spectrum.’
It appears, in this otherwise so happy meeting, there talked one ‘Philistine’; who even now, to the general weariness, was dominantly pouring-forth Philistinism (Philistriositäten); little witting what hero was here entering to demolish him! We omit the series of Socratic, or rather Diogenic utterances, not unhappy in their way, whereby the monster, ‘persuaded into silence,’ seems soon after to have withdrawn for the night. ‘Of which dialectic marauder,’ writes our hero, ‘the discomfiture was visibly felt as a benefit by most: but what were all applauses to the glad smile, threatening every moment to become a laugh, wherewith Blumine herself repaid the victor? He ventured to address her, she answered with attention: nay what if there were a slight tremor in that silver voice; what if the red glow of evening were hiding a transient blush!
It seems that, in this otherwise happy gathering, one 'Philistine' was talking; who even now, to everyone's annoyance, was spouting Philistinism (Philistriositäten); unaware of the hero entering to take him down! We skip over the series of Socratic, or rather Diogenic remarks, not unpleasant in their own way, that led to the monster being 'persuaded into silence,' and which soon after seemed to retreat for the night. 'Of which dialectic intruder,' writes our hero, 'the defeat was clearly felt as a relief by most: but what were all the accolades compared to the joyful smile, ready to break into laughter, with which Blumine herself rewarded the victor? He dared to speak to her, and she listened attentively: but what if there was a slight quiver in that silver voice; what if the evening's red glow was hiding a fleeting blush!
‘The conversation took a higher tone, one fine thought called forth another: it was one of those rare seasons, when the soul expands with full freedom, and man feels himself brought near to man. Gaily in light, graceful abandonment, the friendly talk played round that circle; for the burden was rolled from every heart; the barriers of Ceremony, which are indeed the laws of polite living, had melted as into vapour; and the poor claims of Me and Thee, no longer parted by rigid fences, now flowed softly into one another; and Life lay all harmonious, many-tinted, like some fair royal champaign, the sovereign and owner of which were Love only. Such music springs from kind hearts, in a kind environment of place and time. And yet as the light grew more aërial on the mountain-tops, and the shadows fell longer over the valley, some faint tone of sadness may have breathed through the heart; and, in whispers more or less audible, reminded every one that as this bright day was drawing towards its close, so likewise must the Day of Man’s Existence decline into dust and darkness; and with all its sick toilings, and joyful and mournful noises sink in the still Eternity.
‘The conversation took on a deeper tone, one good thought leading to another: it was one of those rare moments when the soul stretches out freely, and people feel connected to each other. Lightheartedly and effortlessly, friendly chatter flowed around that group; the weight was lifted from every heart; the constraints of etiquette, which are really just social norms, had dissolved like mist; and the petty claims of Me and Thee, no longer separated by strict boundaries, now blended together softly; and life appeared all harmonious, colorful, like a beautiful royal landscape, owned solely by Love. Such music comes from kind hearts in a warm setting of time and place. Yet, as the light grew softer on the mountaintops and the shadows stretched longer over the valley, a faint hint of sadness may have whispered through the heart; and, in barely audible murmurs, reminded everyone that as this bright day was coming to an end, so too must the Day of Man’s Existence fade into dust and darkness; with all its struggles, and joyful and sorrowful sounds sinking into the stillness of Eternity.
‘To our Friend the hours seemed moments; holy 109was he and happy: the words from those sweetest lips came over him like dew on thirsty grass; all better feelings in his soul seemed to whisper: It is good for us to be here. At parting, the Blumine’s hand was in his: in the balmy twilight, with the kind stars above them, he spoke something of meeting again, which was not contradicted; he pressed gently those small soft fingers, and it seemed as if they were not hastily, not angrily withdrawn.’
‘To our friend, the hours felt like mere moments; he was both holy and happy: the words from those sweetest lips washed over him like dew on thirsty grass; all the better feelings in his soul seemed to whisper: It’s good for us to be here. As they parted, Blumine’s hand was in his: in the soft twilight, under the kind stars above them, he mentioned something about meeting again, which wasn't denied; he gently squeezed those small, soft fingers, and it felt like they weren’t quickly, or angrily, pulled away.’
Poor Teufelsdröckh! it is clear to demonstration thou art smit: the Queen of Hearts would see a ‘man of genius’ also sigh for her; and there, by art-magic, in that preternatural hour, has she bound and spell-bound thee. ‘Love is not altogether a Delirium,’ says he elsewhere; ‘yet has it many points in common therewith. I call it rather a discerning of the Infinite in the Finite, of the Idea made Real; which discerning again may be either true or false, either seraphic or demoniac, Inspiration or Insanity. But in the former case too, as in common Madness, it is Fantasy that superadds itself to sight; on the so petty domain of the Actual plants its Archimedes-lever, whereby to move at will the infinite Spiritual. Fantasy I might call the true Heaven-gate and Hell-gate of man: his sensuous life is but the small temporary stage (Zeitbühne), whereon thick-streaming influences from both these far yet near regions meet visibly, and act tragedy and melodrama. Sense can support herself handsomely, in most countries, for some eighteenpence a day; but for Fantasy planets and solar-systems will not suffice. Witness your Pyrrhus conquering the world, yet drinking no better red wine than he had before.’ Alas! witness also your Diogenes, flame-clad, scaling the upper Heaven, and verging towards Insanity, for prize of a ‘high-souled Brunette,’ as if the earth held but one and not several of these!
Poor Teufelsdröckh! It's obvious that you're smitten: the Queen of Hearts wants a 'man of genius' to sigh for her too; and there, through artistic magic, in that strange hour, she has enchanted you. 'Love is not entirely a Delirium,' he says elsewhere; 'yet it shares many aspects with it. I see it more as a recognition of the Infinite within the Finite, of the Idea made Real; which recognition can be either accurate or misguided, either heavenly or demonic, Inspiration or Insanity. But even in the first case, just like in common Madness, it's Fantasy that adds to our perception; it plants its Archimedes lever on the trivial territory of the Actual, allowing it to move the infinite Spiritual at will. Fantasy could be called the true Heaven-gate and Hell-gate of humanity: our sensory life is just a tiny, temporary stage (Zeitbühne), where powerful influences from both these distant yet close realms meet visibly and create tragedy and melodrama. Our senses can manage quite well in most countries for just eighteen pence a day; but for Fantasy, planets and solar systems are not enough. Just look at your Pyrrhus conquering the world, yet drinking no better red wine than he did before.' Alas! also consider your Diogenes, dressed in flames, climbing to the upper Heaven, nearing Insanity, all for the prize of a 'high-souled Brunette,' as if the earth held only one and not many of these!
He says that, in Town, they met again: ‘day after day, like his heart’s sun, the blooming Blumine shone on him. Ah! a little while ago, and he was yet in all darkness; him what Graceful (Holde) would ever love? Disbelieving all things, the poor youth had never learned to believe in himself. Withdrawn, in proud timidity, 110within his own fastnesses; solitary from men, yet baited by night-spectres enough, he saw himself, with a sad indignation, constrained to renounce the fairest hopes of existence. And now, O now! “She looks on thee,” cried he: “she the fairest, noblest; do not her dark eyes tell thee, thou art not despised? The Heaven’s-Messenger! All Heaven’s blessings be hers!” Thus did soft melodies flow through his heart; tones of an infinite gratitude; sweetest intimations that he also was a man, that for him also unutterable joys had been provided.
He says that, in Town, they met again: ‘day after day, like the sun in his heart, the blooming Blumine shone on him. Ah! not long ago, he was still in total darkness; who would ever love a guy like him, what with his Graceful (Holde)? Disbelieving everything, the poor guy had never learned to believe in himself. Withdrawn, in proud timidity, 110isolated from others, yet haunted by enough nightmarish thoughts, he saw himself, with a sad anger, forced to give up on the best hopes of life. And now, oh now! “She looks at you,” he cried: “she, the most beautiful and noble; don’t her dark eyes tell you that you’re not despised? The Heaven’s Messenger! All of Heaven’s blessings be hers!” Thus did sweet melodies flow through his heart; notes of infinite gratitude; the sweetest hints that he, too, was a man, that there were also unspeakable joys meant for him.
‘In free speech, earnest or gay, amid lambent glances, laughter, tears, and often with the inarticulate mystic speech of Music: such was the element they now lived in; in such a many-tinted, radiant Aurora, and by this fairest of Orient Light-bringers must our Friend be blandished, and the new Apocalypse of Nature unrolled to him. Fairest Blumine! And, even as a Star, all Fire and humid Softness, a very Light-ray incarnate! Was there so much as a fault, a “caprice,” he could have dispensed with? Was she not to him in very deed a Morning-Star; did not her presence bring with it airs from Heaven? As from Æolian Harps in the breath of dawn, as from the Memnon’s Statue struck by the rosy finger of Aurora, unearthly music was around him, and lapped him into untried balmy Rest. Pale Doubt fled away to the distance; Life bloomed-up with happiness and hope. The past, then, was all a haggard dream; he had been in the Garden of Eden, then, and could not discern it! But lo now! the black walls of his prison melt away; the captive is alive, is free. If he loved his Disenchantress? Ach Gott! His whole heart and soul and life were hers, but never had he named it Love: existence was all a Feeling, not yet shaped into a Thought.’
‘In free speech, whether serious or playful, surrounded by warm glances, laughter, tears, and often by the indescribable, mystical language of Music: this was the environment they now inhabited; it was in this colorful, radiant dawn, and by this most beautiful of Eastern Light-bringers that our Friend must be wooed, and the new Revelation of Nature revealed to him. Fairest Blumine! And, just like a Star, all Fire and soft warmth, a true ray of light made flesh! Could he have found even a single flaw, a “whim,” he could overlook? Was she not truly a Morning-Star to him; did her presence not bring with it heavenly breezes? Like the sounds from Æolian Harps in the morning air, like the Memnon’s Statue touched by the rosy fingers of dawn, unearthly music surrounded him, enveloping him in an unfamiliar, soothing Rest. Pale Doubt retreated to the horizon; Life blossomed with happiness and hope. The past, then, was just a haunting dream; he had been in the Garden of Eden, yet failed to recognize it! But look now! the dark walls of his prison dissolve; the captive is alive, is free. Did he love his Enchantress? Oh God! His whole heart, soul, and life belonged to her, but he had never called it Love: existence was just a Feeling, not yet transformed into a Thought.’
Nevertheless, into a Thought, nay into an Action, it must be shaped; for neither Disenchanter nor Disenchantress, mere ‘Children of Time,’ can abide by Feeling alone. The Professor knows not, to this day, ‘how in her soft, fervid bosom the Lovely found determination, even on hest of Necessity, to cut-asunder these so blissful bonds.’ He even appears surprised at the 111‘Duenna Cousin,’ whoever she may have been, ‘in whose meagre, hunger-bitten philosophy, the religion of young hearts was, from the first, faintly approved of.’ We, even at such distance, can explain it without necromancy. Let the Philosopher answer this one question: What figure, at that period, was a Mrs. Teufelsdröckh likely to make in polished society? Could she have driven so much as a brass-bound Gig, or even a simple iron-spring one? Thou foolish ‘absolved Auscultator,’ before whom lies no prospect of capital, will any yet known ‘religion of young hearts’ keep the human kitchen warm? Pshaw! thy divine Blumine when she ‘resigned herself to wed some richer,’ shows more philosophy, though but ‘a woman of genius,’ than thou, a pretended man.
Nonetheless, it has to be turned into a thought, even an action; because neither a Disenchanter nor a Disenchantress, mere 'Children of Time,' can rely on feelings alone. The Professor still doesn't understand, even today, 'how in her soft, passionate heart the Lovely found the resolve, even under pressure, to break these blissful ties.' He even seems surprised by the ‘Duenna Cousin,’ whoever she may have been, 'in whose thin, starving philosophy, the belief of young hearts was, from the start, barely acknowledged.' We, even from this distance, can explain it without any magic. Let the Philosopher tackle this one question: What impression would a Mrs. Teufelsdröckh have made in refined society at that time? Could she have driven even a brass-bound carriage, or just a simple iron-spring one? You foolish 'unexamined Listener,' who has no hope of profit, will any known 'belief of young hearts' keep the kitchen warm? Nonsense! Your divine Blumine, when she 'resigned herself to marry someone wealthier,' shows more wisdom, even as 'a woman of talent,' than you, a pretended man.
Our readers have witnessed the origin of this Love-mania, and with what royal splendour it waxes, and rises. Let no one ask us to unfold the glories of its dominant state; much less the horrors of its almost instantaneous dissolution. How from such inorganic masses, henceforth madder than ever, as lie in these Bags, can even fragments of a living delineation be organised? Besides, of what profit were it? We view, with a lively pleasure, the gay silk Montgolfier start from the ground, and shoot upwards, cleaving the liquid deeps, till it dwindle to a luminous star: but what is there to look longer on, when once, by natural elasticity, or accident of fire, it has exploded? A hapless air-navigator, plunging amid torn parachutes, sand-bags, and confused wreck, fast enough into the jaws of the Devil! Suffice it to know that Teufelsdröckh rose into the highest regions of the Empyrean, by a natural parabolic track, and returned thence in a quick perpendicular one. For the rest, let any feeling reader, who has been unhappy enough to do the like, paint it out for himself: considering only that if he, for his perhaps comparatively insignificant mistress, underwent such agonies and frenzies, what must Teufelsdröckh’s have been, with a fire-heart, and for a nonpareil Blumine! We glance merely at the final scene:
Our readers have seen the start of this Love-craze, and how it grows with such royal brilliance and lifts us up. Let’s not dive into the glories of its peak state; even less should we discuss the horrors of its almost immediate collapse. How can fragments of a living image be formed from such lifeless masses, which now seem crazier than ever, as sit in these Bags? Besides, what would be the point? We watch with great pleasure as the colorful silk Montgolfier takes off from the ground, soaring upward, cutting through the airy depths, until it shrinks to a glowing star: but what is there to look at once, by natural elasticity or a fiery accident, it has burst? A doomed air traveler, crashing among torn parachutes, sandbags, and chaotic wreckage, falling fast into the jaws of disaster! It's enough to know that Teufelsdröckh rose into the highest skies by a natural parabolic path and returned quickly in a straight line. For the rest, let any empathetic reader, who has been unfortunate enough to experience something similar, visualize it for themselves: just consider that if he, for his perhaps relatively unimportant beloved, went through such pains and madness, what must Teufelsdröckh have felt, with a fiery heart and for a unique Blumine! We only glance at the final scene:
‘One morning, he found his Morning-Star all dimmed and dusky-red; the fair creature was silent, 112absent, she seemed to have been weeping. Alas, no longer a Morning-star, but a troublous skyey Portent, announcing that the Doomsday had dawned! She said, in a tremulous voice, They were to meet no more.’ The thunder-struck Air-sailor is not wanting to himself in this dread hour: but what avails it? We omit the passionate expostulations, entreaties, indignations, since all was vain, and not even an explanation was conceded him; and hasten to the catastrophe. ‘“Farewell, then, Madam!” said he, not without sternness, for his stung pride helped him. She put her hand in his, she looked in his face, tears started to her eyes: in wild audacity he clasped her to his bosom; their lips were joined, their two souls, like two dew-drops, rushed into one,—for the first time, and for the last!’ Thus was Teufelsdröckh made immortal by a kiss. And then? Why, then—‘thick curtains of Night rushed over his soul, as rose the immeasurable Crash of Doom; and through the ruins as of a shivered Universe was he falling, falling, towards the Abyss.’
‘One morning, he found his Morning-Star all dimmed and dusky-red; the beautiful creature was silent, 112 absent, as if she had been crying. Sadly, she was no longer a Morning-star, but a troubled sky full of omens, signaling that Doomsday had arrived! She spoke in a trembling voice that they were not to meet again.’ The shocked Air-sailor was not lacking in this dreadful moment: but what good did it do? We skip the passionate arguments, pleas, and anger since all was useless, and he wasn’t even granted an explanation; we hurry to the catastrophe. ‘“Farewell, then, Madam!” he said, not without a sense of sternness, for his wounded pride aided him. She took his hand, looked into his eyes, tears welling up; in a moment of wild boldness, he pulled her to his chest; their lips met, their two souls, like two dew-drops, merged into one—for the first time, and for the last!’ Thus was Teufelsdröckh made immortal by a kiss. And then? Well, then—‘thick curtains of Night rushed over his soul, as the immense Crash of Doom arose; and through the wreckage of a shattered Universe, he was falling, falling, towards the Abyss.’
CHAPTER VI
CHAPTER 6
SORROWS OF TEUFELSDRÖCKH
We have long felt that, with a man like our Professor, matters must often be expected to take a course of their own; that in so multiplex, intricate a nature, there might be channels, both for admitting and emitting, such as the Psychologist had seldom noted; in short, that on no grand occasion and convulsion, neither in the joy-storm nor in the woe-storm, could you predict his demeanour.
We have always thought that with a guy like our Professor, things probably go in their own direction; that in such a complex and detailed personality, there could be ways of accepting and reacting that the Psychologist rarely observed; in short, that you could never predict his behavior during significant events or upheavals, whether in times of joy or in times of sorrow.
To our less philosophical readers, for example, it is now clear that the so passionate Teufelsdröckh, precipitated through ‘a shivered Universe’ in this extraordinary way, has only one of three things which he can next do: Establish himself in Bedlam; begin writing Satanic Poetry; or blow-out his brains. In the progress towards any of which consummations, do not 113such readers anticipate extravagance enough; breast-beating, brow-beating (against walls), lion-bellowings of blasphemy and the like, stampings, smitings, breakages of furniture, if not arson itself?
To our less philosophical readers, it's now obvious that the intensely passionate Teufelsdröckh, thrown into ‘a shattered Universe’ in such an extraordinary way, has only three options: he can either settle in a mental asylum; start writing dark poetry; or take his own life. In the pursuit of any of these outcomes, shouldn’t those readers expect enough drama? There would likely be a lot of emotional outbursts, banging his head against the walls, roaring in rage, and similar expressions—stomping, smashing things, breaking furniture, if not outright arson?
Nowise so does Teufelsdröckh deport him. He quietly lifts his Pilgerstab (Pilgrim-staff), ‘old business being soon wound-up’; and begins a perambulation and circumambulation of the terraqueous Globe! Curious it is, indeed, how with such vivacity of conception, such intensity of feeling, above all, with these unconscionable habits of Exaggeration in speech, he combines that wonderful stillness of his, that stoicism in external procedure. Thus, if his sudden bereavement, in this matter of the Flower-goddess, is talked of as a real Doomsday and Dissolution of Nature, in which light doubtless it partly appeared to himself, his own nature is nowise dissolved thereby; but rather is compressed closer. For once, as we might say, a Blumine by magic appliances has unlocked that shut heart of his, and its hidden things rush-out tumultuous, boundless, like genii enfranchised from their glass phial: but no sooner are your magic appliances withdrawn, than the strange casket of a heart springs-to again; and perhaps there is now no key extant that will open it; for a Teufelsdröckh, as we remarked, will not love a second time. Singular Diogenes! No sooner has that heart-rending occurrence fairly taken place, than he affects to regard it as a thing natural, of which there is nothing more to be said. ‘One highest hope, seemingly legible in the eyes of an Angel, had recalled him as out of Death-shadows into celestial Life: but a gleam of Tophet passed-over the face of his Angel; he was rapt away in whirlwinds, and heard the laughter of Demons. It was a Calenture,’ adds he, ‘whereby the Youth saw green Paradise-groves in the waste Ocean-waters: a lying vision, yet not wholly a lie, for he saw it.’ But what things soever passed in him, when he ceased to see it; what ragings and despairings soever Teufelsdröckh’s soul was the scene of, he has the goodness to conceal under a quite opaque cover of Silence. We know it well; the first mad paroxysm past, our brave Gneschen collected his dismembered philosophies, 114and buttoned himself together; he was meek, silent, or spoke of the weather and the Journals: only by a transient knitting of those shaggy brows, by some deep flash of those eyes, glancing one knew not whether with tear-dew or with fierce fire,—might you have guessed what a Gehenna was within; that a whole Satanic School were spouting, though inaudibly, there. To consume your own choler, as some chimneys consume their own smoke; to keep a whole Satanic School spouting, if it must spout, inaudibly, is a negative yet no slight virtue, nor one of the commonest in these times.
Teufelsdröckh doesn’t act like that at all. He calmly lifts his Pilgerstab (Pilgrim-staff), ready to wrap up his old business, and starts walking around the globe! It's really interesting how, with such lively ideas and strong emotions, and especially with his outrageous tendency to exaggerate in speech, he manages to maintain such a remarkable calmness and stoicism in his actions. So, while his sudden loss regarding the Flower-goddess is treated as a true end of the world and a collapse of nature—which he may have partly felt himself—his own nature isn’t shattered; instead, it becomes more intense. For once, we might say, a Blumine has magically opened his closed heart, and all its hidden feelings spill out wildly, boundless like spirits freed from their bottles. But as soon as the magic is gone, this strange casket of a heart closes up again; and perhaps there’s no key left that can unlock it because, as we noted, a Teufelsdröckh won’t fall in love a second time. Strange Diogenes! As soon as this heart-wrenching event happens, he pretends to see it as something normal, as if there’s nothing more to say. ‘One highest hope, seemingly visible in the eyes of an Angel, had brought him back from the shadows of death into a heavenly life: but a glimpse of hell passed over his Angel’s face; he was swept away in whirlwinds and heard the laughter of demons. It was a Calenture,’ he adds, ‘where the Youth saw lush paradise groves in the vast ocean waters: a deceptive vision, yet not completely a lie, for he saw it.’ But whatever turmoil and despair Teufelsdröckh’s soul experienced when he stopped seeing it, he has the decency to hide under a thick cover of silence. We know very well that after the initial madness passed, our brave Gneschen gathered his shattered philosophies and pulled himself together; he was quiet, subdued, or spoke about the weather and the news: only through a fleeting furrowing of his shaggy brows or a brief flash in his eyes, which could have been tears or fierce anger, could you have guessed the hell he was going through; that a whole dark anguish was bubbling underneath, though silently. To contain your own anger, like some chimneys burn their own smoke; to keep an entire dark anguish brewing, even if it must do so silently, is an admirable, albeit negative, virtue, and one not commonly found these days.
Nevertheless, we will not take upon us to say, that in the strange measure he fell upon, there was not a touch of latent Insanity; whereof indeed the actual condition of these Documents in Capricornus and Aquarius is no bad emblem. His so unlimited Wanderings, toilsome enough, are without assigned or perhaps assignable aim; internal Unrest seems his sole guidance; he wanders, wanders, as if that curse of the Prophet had fallen on him, and he were ‘made like unto a wheel.’ Doubtless, too, the chaotic nature of these Paper-bags aggravates our obscurity. Quite without note of preparation, for example, we come upon the following slip: ‘A peculiar feeling it is that will rise in the Traveller, when turning some hill-range in his desert road, he descries lying far below, embosomed among its groves and green natural bulwarks, and all diminished to a toybox, the fair Town, where so many souls, as it were seen and yet unseen, are driving their multifarious traffic. Its white steeple is then truly a starward-pointing finger; the canopy of blue smoke seems like a sort of Life-breath: for always, of its own unity, the soul gives unity to whatsoever it looks on with love; thus does the little Dwelling place of men, in itself a congeries of houses and huts, become for us an individual, almost a person. But what thousand other thoughts unite thereto, if the place has to ourselves been the arena of joyous or mournful experiences; if perhaps the cradle we were rocked in still stands there, if our Loving ones still dwell there, if our Buried ones there slumber!’ Does Teufelsdröckh, as the wounded eagle is said to make for its own eyrie, and indeed military deserters, 115and all hunted outcast creatures, turn as if by instinct in the direction of their birthland,—fly first, in this extremity, towards his native Entepfuhl; but reflecting that there no help awaits him, take but one wistful look from the distance, and then wend elsewhither?
Nevertheless, we won’t claim that the unusual path he took didn’t have a hint of hidden madness; indeed, the current state of these documents in Capricornus and Aquarius is a fitting symbol. His limitless wanderings, which are tiring enough, lack any specific, or maybe even assignable, purpose; internal restlessness seems to be his only guide; he roams around as if the Prophet’s curse had been placed upon him, and he was ‘made like unto a wheel.’ Surely, the chaotic nature of these paper bags adds to our confusion. Without any indication of preparation, for instance, we come across this note: ‘It’s a strange feeling that arises in the traveler when, rounding a hill on his desert journey, he spots far below, nestled among its groves and green natural barriers, the beautiful town, which, in a way, appears both seen and unseen, where many souls are engaged in their various activities. Its white steeple genuinely looks like a finger pointing toward the stars; the blue smoke canopy resembles a kind of breath of life: for always, the soul, through its own unity, gives coherence to whatever it gazes upon with affection; thus, the small dwelling place of people, a collection of houses and huts, becomes for us an individual, almost a person. But what thousands of other thoughts come together with this, if the place has been for us the scene of joyful or sorrowful memories; if perhaps the cradle we were rocked in still stands there, if our loved ones still live there, if our buried ones rest there!’ Does Teufelsdröckh, like a wounded eagle that instinctively flies back to its nest, and indeed like military deserters and all hunted outcasts, turn back toward his homeland—first flying, in this moment of desperation, toward his native Entepfuhl; but realizing there’s no help waiting for him, takes just one wistful look from a distance, and then heads elsewhere?
Little happier seems to be his next flight: into the wilds of Nature; as if in her mother-bosom he would seek healing. So at least we incline to interpret the following Notice, separated from the former by some considerable space, wherein, however, is nothing noteworthy:
Little happier seems to be his next journey: into the wilderness of Nature; as if he would seek healing in her nurturing embrace. This is how we tend to interpret the following Notice, which is separated from the previous one by some significant distance, but contains nothing of significance:
‘Mountains were not new to him; but rarely are Mountains seen in such combined majesty and grace as here. The rocks are of that sort called Primitive by the mineralogists, which always arrange themselves in masses of a rugged, gigantic character; which ruggedness, however, is here tempered by a singular airiness of form, and softness of environment: in a climate favourable to vegetation, the gray cliff, itself covered with lichens, shoots-up through a garment of foliage or verdure; and white, bright cottages, tree-shaded, cluster round the everlasting granite. In fine vicissitude, Beauty alternates with Grandeur: you ride through stony hollows, along straight passes, traversed by torrents, overhung by high walls of rock; now winding amid broken shaggy chasms, and huge fragments; now suddenly emerging into some emerald valley, where the streamlet collects itself into a Lake, and man has again found a fair dwelling, and it seems as if Peace had established herself in the bosom of Strength.
Mountains weren’t new to him, but it’s rare to see them combined with such majesty and grace as here. The rocks are what mineralogists call Primitive, which tend to form massive, rugged shapes; however, their ruggedness here is softened by a unique lightness of form and gentle surroundings. In a climate that encourages vegetation, the gray cliffs, covered in lichens, rise up through a blanket of foliage and greenery, while bright white cottages, shaded by trees, cluster around the enduring granite. In beautiful contrast, Beauty alternates with Grandeur: you ride through stony hollows along straight paths shaped by torrents, overshadowed by towering rock walls; sometimes winding through broken, shaggy ravines and huge boulders; and then suddenly coming into an emerald valley where the stream collects into a lake, and humans have once again found a lovely place to live, making it seem like Peace has settled in the heart of Strength.
‘To Peace, however, in this vortex of existence, can the Son of Time not pretend: still less if some Spectre haunt him from the Past; and the future is wholly a Stygian Darkness, spectre-bearing. Reasonably might the Wanderer exclaim to himself: Are not the gates of this world’s happiness inexorably shut against thee; hast thou a hope that is not mad? Nevertheless, one may still murmur audibly, or in the original Greek if that suit better: “Whoso can look on Death will start at no shadows.”
‘To Peace, however, in this whirlwind of life, can the Son of Time really pretend: even less so if some Ghost from the Past is haunting him; and the future is completely a Stygian Darkness, full of spectres. It’s reasonable for the Wanderer to ask himself: Aren’t the gates to this world’s happiness cruelly shut against you; do you have any hope that isn’t insane? Still, one can quietly murmur, or in the original Greek if that works better: “Whoever can face Death will not be afraid of shadows.”
‘From such meditations is the Wanderer’s attention called outwards; for now the Valley closes-in abruptly, 116intersected by a huge mountain mass, the stony water-worn ascent of which is not to be accomplished on horseback. Arrived aloft, he finds himself again lifted into the evening sunset light; and cannot but pause, and gaze round him, some moments there. An upland irregular expanse of wold, where valleys in complex branchings are suddenly or slowly arranging their descent towards every quarter of the sky. The mountain-ranges are beneath your feet, and folded together: only the loftier summits look down here and there as on a second plain; lakes also lie clear and earnest in their solitude. No trace of man now visible; unless indeed it were he who fashioned that little visible link of Highway, here, as would seem, scaling the inaccessible, to unite Province with Province. But sunwards, lo you! how it towers sheer up, a world of Mountains, the diadem and centre of the mountain region! A hundred and a hundred savage peaks, in the last light of Day; all glowing, of gold and amethyst, like giant spirits of the wilderness; there in their silence, in their solitude, even as on the night when Noah’s Deluge first dried! Beautiful, nay solemn, was the sudden aspect to our Wanderer. He gazed over those stupendous masses with wonder, almost with longing desire; never till this hour had he known Nature, that she was One, that she was his Mother, and divine. And as the ruddy glow was fading into clearness in the sky, and the Sun had now departed, a murmur of Eternity and Immensity, of Death and of Life, stole through his soul; and he felt as if Death and Life were one, as if the Earth were not dead, as if the Spirit of the Earth had its throne in that splendour, and his own spirit were therewith holding communion.
‘From these reflections, the Wanderer’s focus shifts outward; for now the Valley abruptly closes in, intersected by a massive mountain range, the rocky, worn path of which cannot be navigated on horseback. Once at the top, he finds himself bathed in the warm light of the evening sunset and takes a moment to pause and look around. An uneven stretch of high land unfolds before him, where valleys twist and turn, rapidly or gradually making their way down towards every corner of the sky. The mountain ranges lie beneath him, folded together; only the higher peaks rise above, appearing like a second plateau, while lakes sit clear and serene in their solitude. No sign of humanity is visible now, except perhaps for that little piece of Highway, seemingly climbing the impossible, aimed at connecting Province with Province. But look towards the sun! How it towers straight up, a vast world of Mountains, the crown and heart of the mountain region! Hundreds of wild peaks, illuminated in the last light of day; all shining with gold and amethyst, like giant spirits of the wild; there in their silence, in their isolation, just like on the night when Noah’s Flood first receded! Beautiful, indeed solemn, was this sudden sight to our Wanderer. He looked over those colossal formations with awe, almost with yearning; never until this moment had he understood Nature, that she was One, that she was his Mother, and divine. As the reddish glow faded into the clear sky, and the Sun had now set, a whisper of Eternity and Immensity, of Death and of Life, flowed through his soul; and he felt as if Death and Life were one, as if the Earth were alive, as if the Spirit of the Earth held its throne in that brilliance, and his own spirit was communing with it.
‘The spell was broken by a sound of carriage-wheels. Emerging from the hidden Northward, to sink soon into the hidden Southward, came a gay Barouche-and-four: it was open; servants and postillions wore wedding-favours: that happy pair, then, had found each other, it was their marriage evening! Few moments brought them near: Du Himmel! It was Herr Towgood and—Blumine! With slight unrecognising salutation they passed me; plunged down amid the neighbouring 117thickets, onwards, to Heaven, and to England; and I, in my friend Richter’s words, I remained alone, behind them, with the Night.’
‘The spell was broken by the sound of carriage wheels. Coming from the hidden North and soon disappearing into the hidden South was a cheerful barouche and four horses: it was open, and the servants and postillions wore wedding favors. So that happy couple had found each other—it was their wedding night! In just a few moments, they were close: Oh heaven! It was Herr Towgood and—Blumine! With a brief, unrecognizing greeting, they passed me; they plunged down into the nearby thickets, heading towards heaven and England; and I, in my friend Richter’s words, was left behind with the night.’
Were it not cruel in these circumstances, here might be the place to insert an observation, gleaned long ago from the great Clothes-Volume, where it stands with quite other intent: ‘Some time before Small-pox was extirpated,’ says the Professor, ‘there came a new malady of the spiritual sort on Europe: I mean the epidemic, now endemical, of View-hunting. Poets of old date, being privileged with Senses, had also enjoyed external Nature; but chiefly as we enjoy the crystal cup which holds good or bad liquor for us; that is to say, in silence, or with slight incidental commentary: never, as I compute, till after the Sorrows of Werter, was there man found who would say: Come let us make a Description! Having drunk the liquor, come let us eat the glass! Of which endemic the Jenner is unhappily still to seek.’ Too true!
If it weren't so cruel in this situation, this could be a good place to share an observation I picked up long ago from the famous Clothes-Volume, where it was intended for a different purpose: ‘A while before Smallpox was eradicated,’ says the Professor, ‘Europe experienced a new spiritual illness: the epidemic, now endemic, of View-hunting. Poets from earlier times, being gifted with Senses, also appreciated the beauty of Nature, but mostly as we enjoy a crystal glass that holds good or bad drinks for us; that is to say, in silence, or with brief comments here and there: never, as far as I can tell, until after the Sorrows of Werter, was there a person who would say: Let's create a Description! After having savored the drink, let’s also consume the glass! For which endemic, Jenner is unfortunately still sought.’ How true!
We reckon it more important to remark that the Professor’s Wanderings, so far as his stoical and cynical envelopment admits us to clear insight, here first take their permanent character, fatuous or not. That Basilisk-glance of the Barouche-and-four seems to have withered-up what little remnant of a purpose may have still lurked in him: Life has become wholly a dark labyrinth; wherein, through long years, our Friend, flying from spectres, has to stumble about at random, and naturally with more haste than progress.
We find it more important to point out that the Professor’s Wanderings, as much as his stoic and cynical demeanor allows us to gain clear insight, first showcase their lasting nature, whether foolish or not. That piercing gaze from the horse-drawn carriage seems to have drained whatever small amount of purpose was left in him: Life has turned entirely into a dark maze; where, for many years, our Friend, running from his fears, has had to wander aimlessly, and naturally with more urgency than actual progress.
Foolish were it in us to attempt following him, even from afar, in this extraordinary world-pilgrimage of his; the simplest record of which, were clear record possible, would fill volumes. Hopeless is the obscurity, unspeakable the confusion. He glides from country to country, from condition to condition; vanishing and reappearing, no man can calculate how or where. Through all quarters of the world he wanders, and apparently through all circles of society. If in any scene, perhaps difficult to fix geographically, he settles for a time, and forms connexions, be sure he will snap them abruptly asunder. Let him sink out of sight as Private Scholar (Privatisirender), living by the grace of 118God in some European capital, you may next find him as Hadjee in the neighbourhood of Mecca. It is an inexplicable Phantasmagoria, capricious, quick-changing; as if our Traveller, instead of limbs and high-ways, had transported himself by some wishing-carpet, or Fortunatus’ Hat. The whole, too, imparted emblematically, in dim multifarious tokens (as that collection of Street-Advertisements); with only some touch of direct historical notice sparingly interspersed: little light-islets in the world of haze! So that, from this point, the Professor is more of an enigma than ever. In figurative language, we might say he becomes, not indeed a spirit, yet spiritualised, vaporised Fact unparalleled in Biography: The river of his History, which we have traced from its tiniest fountains, and hoped to see flow onward, with increasing current, into the ocean, here dashes itself over that terrific Lover’s Leap; and, as a mad-foaming cataract, flies wholly into tumultuous clouds of spray! Low down it indeed collects again into pools and plashes; yet only at a great distance, and with difficulty, if at all, into a general stream. To cast a glance into certain of those pools and plashes, and trace whither they run, must, for a chapter or two, form the limit of our endeavour.
It would be foolish for us to try to follow him, even from a distance, on this incredible journey he’s on; the simplest account of it, if a clear one were possible, would fill volumes. The obscurity is hopeless, and the confusion is beyond words. He moves from country to country, from one situation to another; disappearing and reappearing, and no one can predict how or where. He wanders through every corner of the world, clearly navigating all levels of society. If he settles in any location, which might be hard to pinpoint geographically, and forms connections, you can be sure he will break them off abruptly. Whether he disappears as a Private Scholar, living by the grace of God in some European capital, you might next find him as a Hadjee near Mecca. It's an inexplicable mix of illusions, capricious and ever-changing; as if our Traveler, instead of using limbs and roads, had transported himself with some magic carpet or Fortunatus' Hat. The entire story, too, is conveyed symbolically, using various unclear signs (like that collection of street advertisements); with only a few direct historical mentions scattered throughout: little beacons of light in a haze! So, from this point, the Professor becomes more of an enigma than ever. Using figurative language, we might say he transforms into, not a spirit, but a spiritualized, vaporized fact unmatched in biography: The river of his history, which we’ve traced from its tiniest sources, and hoped to see flow onward with a stronger current into the ocean, now crashes over a daunting cliff; and, as a wild, foaming waterfall, it completely erupts into a tumult of sprays! While it does collect into pools and splashes down below, it only does so far away, and with great difficulty, if at all, into a unified stream. To take a look into some of those pools and splashes, and see where they lead, will be the limit of our effort for a chapter or two.
For which end doubtless those direct historical Notices, where they can be met with, are the best. Nevertheless, of this sort too there occurs much, which, with our present light, it were questionable to emit. Teufelsdröckh, vibrating everywhere between the highest and the lowest levels, comes into contact with public History itself. For example, those conversations and relations with illustrious Persons, as Sultan Mahmoud, the Emperor Napoleon, and others, are they not as yet rather of a diplomatic character than of a biographic? The Editor, appreciating the sacredness of crowned heads, nay perhaps suspecting the possible trickeries of a Clothes-Philosopher, will eschew this province for the present; a new time may bring new insight and a different duty.
For that reason, it's clear that direct historical accounts, whenever found, are the most reliable. However, even those contain much that, in light of our current understanding, might be questionable to reveal. Teufelsdröckh, oscillating between the highest and lowest levels, interacts with public History itself. For instance, those conversations and relationships with notable figures like Sultan Mahmoud, Emperor Napoleon, and others, are they not more diplomatic than biographical? The Editor, understanding the importance of royal figures, and perhaps wary of the possible deceptions from a Clothes-Philosopher, will avoid this area for now; a new era may bring new perspectives and responsibilities.
If we ask now, not indeed with what ulterior Purpose, for there was none, yet with what immediate outlooks; at all events, in what mood of mind, the Professor undertook 119and prosecuted this world-pilgrimage,—the answer is more distinct than favourable. ‘A nameless Unrest,’ says he, ‘urged me forward; to which the outward motion was some momentary lying solace. Whither should I go? My Loadstars were blotted out; in that canopy of grim fire shone no star. Yet forward must I; the ground burnt under me; there was no rest for the sole of my foot. I was alone, alone! Ever too the strong inward longing shaped Fantasms for itself: towards these, one after the other, must I fruitlessly wander. A feeling I had, that for my fever-thirst there was and must be somewhere a healing Fountain. To many fondly imagined Fountains, the Saints’ Wells of these days, did I pilgrim; to great Men, to great Cities, to great Events: but found there no healing. In strange countries, as in the well-known; in savage deserts, as in the press of corrupt civilisation, it was ever the same: how could your Wanderer escape from—his own Shadow? Nevertheless still Forward! I felt as if in great haste; to do I saw not what. From the depths of my own heart, it called to me, Forwards! The winds and the streams, and all Nature sounded to me, Forwards! Ach Gott, I was even, once for all, a Son of Time.’
If we ask now, not really to uncover some deeper motive—because there was none—but rather to understand his immediate thoughts; in any case, in what state of mind the Professor began and carried on this journey through the world—the answer is clearer than it is positive. "A nameless restlessness," he says, "pushed me on; and the outward movement was just a temporary, deceptive comfort. Where should I go? My guiding stars were erased; in that dark sky, no star shone. Yet onward I must go; the ground burned beneath me; there was no rest for my feet. I was alone, completely alone! Always that strong inner yearning created visions for itself: toward these, one after another, I had to wander in vain. I felt that for my desperate thirst, there was and must be somewhere a healing spring. To many cherished imagined springs, the holy wells of today, I journeyed; to great men, great cities, and great events: but found no healing there. In strange lands, as well as in familiar ones; in wild deserts, and in the clutches of corrupt civilization, it was always the same: how could the wanderer escape from—his own shadow? Still, onward! I felt a sense of urgency; to do what, I couldn't see. From the depths of my heart, it called to me, Forwards! The winds and streams, and all of nature echoed to me, Forwards! Oh God, I was indeed, once and for all, a child of time."
From which is it not clear that the internal Satanic School was still active enough? He says elsewhere: ‘The Enchiridion of Epictetus I had ever with me, often as my sole rational companion; and regret to mention that the nourishment it yielded was trifling.’ Thou foolish Teufelsdröckh! How could it else? Hadst thou not Greek enough to understand thus much: The end of Man is an Action, and not a Thought, though it were the noblest?
From which it’s clear that the internal Satanic School was still active enough? He says elsewhere: ‘I always had the Enchiridion of Epictetus with me, often as my only rational companion; and I regret to say that the nourishment it provided was minimal.’ You foolish Teufelsdröckh! How could it be otherwise? Didn’t you have enough Greek to understand this much: The end of Man is an Action, and not a Thought, even if it were the noblest?
‘How I lived?’ writes he once: ‘Friend, hast thou considered the “rugged all-nourishing Earth,” as Sophocles well names her; how she feeds the sparrow on the house-top, much more her darling, man? While thou stirrest and livest, thou hast a probability of victual. My breakfast of tea has been cooked by a Tartar woman, with water of the Amur, who wiped her earthen kettle with a horse-tail. I have roasted wild-eggs in the sand of Sahara; I have awakened in Paris Estrapades and 120Vienna Malzleins, with no prospect of breakfast beyond elemental liquid. That I had my Living to seek saved me from Dying,—by suicide. In our busy Europe, is there not an everlasting demand for Intellect, in the chemical, mechanical, political, religious, educational, commercial departments? In Pagan countries, cannot one write Fetishes? Living! Little knowest thou what alchemy is in an inventive Soul; how, as with its little finger, it can create provision enough for the body (of a Philosopher); and then, as with both hands, create quite other than provision; namely, spectres to torment itself withal.’
‘How did I live?’ he writes once: ‘Friend, have you considered the “rugged all-nourishing Earth,” as Sophocles aptly calls her; how she feeds the sparrow on the rooftop, even more so her beloved human? While you hustle and bustle, you likely have access to food. My breakfast of tea was prepared by a Tartar woman, using water from the Amur, who wiped her earthen kettle with a horse-tail. I have roasted wild eggs in the sand of the Sahara; I have woken up in Paris’ Estrapades and Vienna’s Malzleins, with no hope of breakfast besides elemental liquid. The fact that I had to find a way to live kept me from dying—by suicide. In our busy Europe, isn’t there an endless need for intellect in the chemical, mechanical, political, religious, educational, and commercial fields? In Pagan countries, can’t one write about fetishes? Living! You little know what alchemy exists in an inventive soul; how, with just its little finger, it can create enough sustenance for the body (of a philosopher); and then, with both hands, create something entirely different; namely, phantoms to torment itself with.’
Poor Teufelsdröckh! Flying with Hunger always parallel to him; and a whole Infernal Chase in his rear; so that the countenance of Hunger is comparatively a friend’s! Thus must he, in the temper of ancient Cain, or of the modern Wandering Jew,—save only that he feels himself not guilty and but suffering the pains of guilt,—wend to and fro with aimless speed. Thus must he, over the whole surface of the Earth (by footprints), write his Sorrows of Teufelsdröckh; even as the great Goethe, in passionate words, had to write his Sorrows of Werter, before the spirit freed herself, and he could become a Man. Vain truly is the hope of your swiftest Runner to escape ‘from his own Shadow’! Nevertheless, in these sick days, when the Born of Heaven first descries himself (about the age of twenty) in a world such as ours, richer than usual in two things, in Truths grown obsolete, and Trades grown obsolete,—what can the fool think but that it is all a Den of Lies, wherein whoso will not speak Lies and act Lies, must stand idle and despair? Whereby it happens that, for your nobler minds, the publishing of some such Work of Art, in one or the other dialect, becomes almost a necessity. For what is it properly but an Altercation with the Devil, before you begin honestly Fighting him? Your Byron publishes his Sorrows of Lord George, in verse and in prose, and copiously otherwise: your Bonaparte represents his Sorrows of Napoleon Opera, in an all-too stupendous style; with music of cannon-volleys, and murder-shrieks of a world; his stage-lights are the fires of Conflagration; his rhyme and recitative 121are the tramp of embattled Hosts and the sound of falling Cities.—Happier is he who, like our Clothes-Philosopher, can write such matter, since it must be written, on the insensible Earth, with his shoe-soles only; and also survive the writing thereof!
Poor Teufelsdröckh! Constantly chased by Hunger and a whole Infernal Pursuit behind him; making Hunger seem like a friend! He must wander aimlessly, much like ancient Cain or the modern Wandering Jew—except he feels no guilt and is simply suffering from the pains of guilt. Thus, he writes his Sorrows of Teufelsdröckh across the Earth (by the marks he leaves behind), just as the great Goethe poured his passionate words into Sorrows of Werter until his spirit was free, allowing him to become a Man. It’s truly futile for the fastest Runner to think he can escape 'his own Shadow'! Still, in these troubled times, when those born of Heaven first see themselves (around the age of twenty) in a world like ours—particularly rich in two things: outdated Truths and obsolete Trades—what can a fool think but that it’s all a Den of Lies, where anyone who won’t speak or act Lies must stand idle and despair? This leads to the necessity for nobler minds to publish some kind of Work of Art, in one form or another. Because what is it, at its core, but a Confrontation with the Devil before you start honestly fighting him? Byron publishes his Sorrows of Lord George in both verse and prose, and in many other ways. Bonaparte presents his Sorrows of Napoleon Opera in a ridiculously grand style; featuring the music of cannon fire and the screams of a world in chaos; the lights of his stage are the flames of Conflagration; his rhythm and recitative 121 are the march of battling Hosts and the sound of collapsing Cities.—Fortunate is he who, like our Clothes-Philosopher, can express such truths, since they must be expressed, on the indifferent Earth, with just the soles of his shoes and still survive the experience!
CHAPTER VII
CHAPTER 7
THE EVERLASTING NO
Under the strange nebulous envelopment, wherein our Professor has now shrouded himself, no doubt but his spiritual nature is nevertheless progressive, and growing: for how can the ‘Son of Time,’ in any case, stand still? We behold him, through those dim years, in a state of crisis, of transition: his mad Pilgrimings, and general solution into aimless Discontinuity, what is all this but a mad Fermentation; wherefrom, the fiercer it is, the clearer product will one day evolve itself?
Under the strange, foggy covering that our Professor has wrapped himself in, it’s clear that his spiritual nature is still growing and evolving. After all, how can the ‘Son of Time’ ever remain stagnant? We see him, through those unclear years, in a state of crisis, transitioning: his wild journeys and his overall shift into a aimless disconnection—what is all this if not a wild fermentation? The more intense it is, the clearer the outcome will eventually become.
Such transitions are ever full of pain: thus the Eagle when he moults is sickly; and, to attain his new beak, must harshly dash-off the old one upon rocks. What Stoicism soever our Wanderer, in his individual acts and motions, may affect, it is clear that there is a hot fever of anarchy and misery raging within; coruscations of which flash out: as, indeed, how could there be other? Have we not seen him disappointed, bemocked of Destiny, through long years? All that the young heart might desire and pray for has been denied; nay, as in the last worst instance, offered and then snatched away. Ever an ‘excellent Passivity’; but of useful, reasonable Activity, essential to the former as Food to Hunger, nothing granted: till at length, in this wild Pilgrimage, he must forcibly seize for himself an Activity, though useless, unreasonable. Alas, his cup of bitterness, which had been filling drop by drop, ever since that first ‘ruddy morning’ in the Hinterschlag Gymnasium, was at the very lip; and then with that poison-drop, of the Towgood-and-Blumine business, it runs over, and even hisses over in a deluge of foam.
Such transitions are always painful: just like the Eagle when it moults and feels weak; to get a new beak, it has to harshly smash off the old one against rocks. No matter what Stoicism our Wanderer shows in his actions and movements, it’s clear he’s suffering from a burning fever of chaos and misery inside; flashes of this pain burst out: how could it be any different? Haven't we seen him let down, mocked by Fate, for many years? Everything the young heart wishes for and prays to have has been denied; in fact, in the worst instances, it was offered and then taken away. Always an 'excellent Passivity'; but about useful, reasonable Activity, which is as essential to the former as Food is to Hunger, nothing has been given: until finally, in this wild Pilgrimage, he must forcibly take some Activity for himself, even if it’s pointless and unreasonable. Alas, his cup of bitterness, which had been filling drop by drop, ever since that first 'ruddy morning' at the Hinterschlag Gymnasium, was at the brim; and then with that final drop of poison from the Towgood-and-Blumine situation, it overflows and spills out in a flood of foam.
122He himself says once, with more justice than originality: ‘Man is, properly speaking, based upon Hope, he has no other possession but Hope; this world of his is emphatically the Place of Hope.’ What, then, was our Professor’s possession? We see him, for the present, quite shut-out from Hope; looking not into the golden orient, but vaguely all round into a dim copper firmament, pregnant with earthquake and tornado.
122He once said, with more truth than creativity: 'Man is, in essence, built on Hope; he has nothing else but Hope; this world of his is definitely the Place of Hope.' So, what did our Professor have? Right now, he's completely shut out from Hope; instead of gazing toward the bright sunrise, he's looking around at a dull copper sky, heavy with the threat of earthquakes and storms.
Alas, shut-out from Hope, in a deeper sense than we yet dream of! For, as he wanders wearisomely through this world, he has now lost all tidings of another and higher. Full of religion, or at least of religiosity, as our Friend has since exhibited himself, he hides not that, in those days, he was wholly irreligious: ‘Doubt had darkened into Unbelief,’ says he; ‘shade after shade goes grimly over your soul, till you have the fixed, starless, Tartarean black.’ To such readers as have reflected, what can be called reflecting, on man’s life, and happily discovered, in contradiction to much Profit-and-loss Philosophy, speculative and practical, that Soul is not synonymous with Stomach; who understand, therefore, in our Friend’s words, ‘that, for man’s well-being, Faith is properly the one thing needful; how, with it, Martyrs, otherwise weak, can cheerfully endure the shame and the cross; and without it, worldlings puke-up their sick existence, by suicide, in the midst of luxury’: to such it will be clear that, for a pure moral nature, the loss of his religious Belief was the loss of everything. Unhappy young man! All wounds, the crush of long-continued Destitution, the stab of false Friendship and of false Love, all wounds in thy so genial heart, would have healed again, had not its life-warmth been withdrawn. Well might he exclaim, in his wild way: ‘Is there no God, then; but at best an absentee God, sitting idle, ever since the first Sabbath, at the outside of his Universe, and seeing it go? Has the word Duty no meaning; is what we call Duty no divine Messenger and Guide, but a false earthly Fantasm, made-up of Desire and Fear, of emanations from the Gallows and from Dr. Graham’s Celestial-Bed? Happiness of an approving Conscience! Did not Paul of Tarsus, whom 123admiring men have since named Saint, feel that he was “the chief of sinners”; and Nero of Rome, jocund in spirit (wohlgemuth), spend much of his time in fiddling? Foolish Word-monger and Motive-grinder, who in thy Logic-mill hast an earthly mechanism for the Godlike itself, and wouldst fain grind me out Virtue from the husks of Pleasure,—I tell thee, Nay! To the unregenerate Prometheus Vinctus of a man, it is ever the bitterest aggravation of his wretchedness that he is conscious of Virtue, that he feels himself the victim not of suffering only, but of injustice. What then? Is the heroic inspiration we name Virtue but some Passion; some bubble of the blood, bubbling in the direction others profit by? I know not: only this I know, If what thou namest Happiness be our true aim, then are we all astray. With Stupidity and sound Digestion man may front much. But what, in these dull unimaginative days, are the terrors of Conscience to the diseases of the Liver! Not on Morality, but on Cookery, let us build our stronghold: there brandishing our frying-pan, as censer, let us offer sweet incense to the Devil, and live at ease on the fat things he has provided for his Elect!’
Unfortunately, cut off from hope in a deeper way than we can imagine! As he wanders through this world, he's now lost all connection to something greater. Although our friend has since shown himself to be full of religion, or at least religious sentiment, he admits that in those days he was completely irreligious: "Doubt has turned into Unbelief," he says; "shade after shade creeps over your soul, until you are left in a fixed, starless, hellish darkness." For those readers who have truly reflected on life and have discovered, contrary to much profit-and-loss philosophy, both speculative and practical, that the soul is not the same as the stomach; who also understand, as our friend puts it, that for human well-being, faith is the one essential thing; how martyrs, who might otherwise appear weak, can endure shame and suffering cheerfully thanks to faith; and without it, those focused only on worldly matters reject their miserable existence through suicide, even amidst luxury: for such readers, it will be clear that, for a pure moral nature, losing his religious belief means losing everything. Poor young man! All the wounds—the crushing burden of prolonged poverty, the pain of false friendships and false love—all the wounds in your warm heart might have healed if its life-giving warmth hadn't been taken away. He might well cry out, in his anguished state: "Is there no God, then? Just an absentee God, sitting idly since the first Sabbath, watching his universe unfold? Does the word Duty mean nothing; is what we call Duty just a false earthly illusion made of Desire and Fear, stemming from the gallows and Dr. Graham's Celestial Bed? The happiness of a clear conscience! Didn't Paul of Tarsus, whom people later called a saint, feel that he was 'the chief of sinners'; and didn’t Nero of Rome, cheerful in spirit, spend much of his time playing the fiddle? You foolish word-monger and motive-grinder, in your philosophical arguments you've created an earthly mechanism for something divine and would have me believe you can extract virtue from mere pleasure—I say no! For the unredeemed man, it's the most bitter addition to his suffering that he is aware of virtue, that he sees himself as a victim of injustice, not just of pain. So, what then? Is the heroic inspiration we call virtue just a passion; a fleeting excitement that benefits others? I don't know: but I do know this, if what you call happiness is our true aim, then we're all misguided. With ignorance and a strong digestion, a person can face a lot. But what do the fears of conscience matter against liver troubles in these dull, unimaginative times! Let's build our stronghold not on morality, but on cooking; there, waving our frying pan like an incense burner, let's offer sweet incense to the devil and enjoy the rich things he has laid out for his chosen ones!"
Thus has the bewildered Wanderer to stand, as so many have done, shouting question after question into the Sibyl-cave of Destiny, and receive no Answer but an Echo. It is all a grim Desert, this once-fair world of his; wherein is heard only the howling of wild-beasts, or the shrieks of despairing, hate-filled men; and no Pillar of Cloud by day, and no Pillar of Fire by night, any longer guides the Pilgrim. To such length has the spirit of Inquiry carried him. ‘But what boots it (was thut’s)?’ cries he: ‘it is but the common lot in this era. Not having come to spiritual majority prior to the Siècle de Louis Quinze, and not being born purely a Loghead (Dummkopf), thou hadst no other outlook. The whole world is, like thee, sold to Unbelief; their old Temples of the Godhead, which for long have not been rainproof, crumble down; and men ask now: Where is the Godhead; our eyes never saw him?’
So the confused Wanderer stands, just like so many others have before him, shouting question after question into the Sibyl cave of Destiny, and gets no answer but an Echo. This once-beautiful world of his is now a grim Desert, where only the howls of wild animals or the cries of hopeless, hate-filled people can be heard; no more does a Pillar of Cloud guide the Pilgrim by day, or a Pillar of Fire by night. The spirit of Inquiry has brought him this far. ‘But what’s the point?’ he exclaims: ‘this is just the common fate in this age. Having not reached spiritual maturity before the Siècle de Louis Quinze, and not being born completely foolish (Dummkopf), you had no other perspective. The whole world is, like you, caught up in Unbelief; their old Temples of the Divine, which haven’t stood the test of time, are crumbling down; and people now ask: Where is the Divine? Our eyes have never seen it?’
Pitiful enough were it, for all these wild utterances, to call our Diogenes wicked. Unprofitable servants 124as we all are, perhaps at no era of his life was he more decisively the Servant of Goodness, the Servant of God, than even now when doubting God’s existence. ‘One circumstance I note,’ says he: ‘after all the nameless woe that Inquiry, which for me, what it is not always, was genuine Love of Truth, had wrought me, I nevertheless still loved Truth, and would bate no jot of my allegiance to her. “Truth”! I cried, “though the Heavens crush me for following her: no Falsehood! though a whole celestial Lubberland were the price of Apostasy.” In conduct it was the same. Had a divine Messenger from the clouds, or miraculous Handwriting on the wall, convincingly proclaimed to me This thou shalt do, with what passionate readiness, as I often thought, would I have done it, had it been leaping into the infernal Fire. Thus, in spite of all Motive-grinders, and Mechanical Profit-and-Loss Philosophies, with the sick ophthalmia and hallucination they had brought on, was the Infinite nature of Duty still dimly present to me: living without God in the world, of God’s light I was not utterly bereft; if my as yet sealed eyes, with their unspeakable longing, could nowhere see Him, nevertheless in my heart He was present, and His heaven-written Law still stood legible and sacred there.’
Pitiful enough as it is, to call our Diogenes wicked seems unjust. As unprofitable servants as we all are, perhaps at no point in his life was he more clearly the Servant of Goodness, the Servant of God, than even now while doubting God’s existence. ‘One thing I notice,’ he says: ‘after all the unnamed suffering that Inquiry, which for me was truly a Love of Truth, caused me, I still loved Truth, and wouldn’t give up my loyalty to her. “Truth”! I exclaimed, “even if the Heavens crush me for pursuing her: no Falsehood! even if all of heaven's rewards were the price of abandoning her.” In my actions, it was the same. If a divine Messenger from the skies, or miraculous Writing on the wall, convincingly told me This thou shalt do, with what eager readiness, as I often thought, would I have done it, even if it meant jumping into the fiery depths. Thus, despite all the skeptics and the cold Profit-and-Loss logic they brought on, the Infinite nature of Duty was still faintly clear to me: though living without God in the world, I was not completely without His light; if my still-sealed eyes, filled with indescribable longing, could see Him nowhere, still in my heart He was present, and His heaven-written Law remained clear and sacred there.’
Meanwhile, under all these tribulations, and temporal and spiritual destitutions, what must the Wanderer, in his silent soul, have endured! ‘The painfullest feeling,’ writes he, ‘is that of your own Feebleness (Unkraft); ever, as the English Milton says, to be weak is the true misery. And yet of your Strength there is and can be no clear feeling, save by what you have prospered in, by what you have done. Between vague wavering Capability and fixed indubitable Performance, what a difference! A certain inarticulate Self-consciousness dwells dimly in us; which only our Works can render articulate and decisively discernible. Our Works are the mirror wherein the spirit first sees its natural lineaments. Hence, too, the folly of that impossible Precept, Know thyself; till it be translated into this partially possible one, Know what thou canst work-at.
Meanwhile, through all these struggles and both material and spiritual hardships, what must the Wanderer have gone through in his quiet soul! "The most painful feeling," he writes, "is that of your own weakness; as the English poet Milton says, to be weak is the true misery. And yet, there is no clear sense of your strength, except through what you have achieved, through what you have done. The difference between vague potential and undeniable achievement is huge! A kind of unclear self-awareness resides dimly within us; only our actions can express it clearly and make it distinguishable. Our actions are the reflection in which the spirit first sees its true features. Hence, the foolishness of that impossible advice, Know thyself; until it is rephrased into this somewhat possible one, Know what you can work on.
‘But for me, so strangely unprosperous had I been, 125the net-result of my Workings amounted as yet simply to—Nothing. How then could I believe in my Strength, when there was as yet no mirror to see it in? Ever did this agitating, yet, as I now perceive, quite frivolous question, remain to me insoluble: Hast thou a certain Faculty, a certain Worth, such even as the most have not; or art thou the completest Dullard of these modern times? Alas! the fearful Unbelief is unbelief in yourself; and how could I believe? Had not my first, last Faith in myself, when even to me the Heavens seemed laid open, and I dared to love, been all-too cruelly belied? The speculative Mystery of Life grew ever more mysterious to me: neither in the practical Mystery had I made the slightest progress, but been everywhere buffeted, foiled, and contemptuously cast-out. A feeble unit in the middle of a threatening Infinitude, I seemed to have nothing given me but eyes, whereby to discern my own wretchedness. Invisible yet impenetrable walls, as of Enchantment, divided me from all living: was there, in the wide world, any true bosom I could press trustfully to mine? O Heaven, No, there was none! I kept a lock upon my lips: why should I speak much with that shifting variety of so-called Friends, in whose withered, vain and too-hungry souls Friendship was but an incredible tradition? In such cases, your resource is to talk little, and that little mostly from the Newspapers. Now when I look back, it was a strange isolation I then lived in. The men and women around me, even speaking with me, were but Figures; I had, practically, forgotten that they were alive, that they were not merely automatic. In midst of their crowded streets and assemblages, I walked solitary; and (except as it was my own heart, not another’s, that I kept devouring) savage also, as the tiger in his jungle. Some comfort it would have been, could I, like a Faust, have fancied myself tempted and tormented of the Devil; for a Hell, as I imagine, without Life, though only diabolic Life, were more frightful: but in our age of Down-pulling and Disbelief, the very Devil has been pulled down, you cannot so much as believe in a Devil. To me the Universe was all void of Life, of Purpose, of Volition, even of Hostility: it was one huge, dead, 126immeasurable Steam-engine, rolling on, in its dead indifference, to grind me limb from limb. O, the vast, gloomy, solitary Golgotha, and Mill of Death! Why was the Living banished thither companionless, conscious? Why, if there is no Devil; nay, unless the Devil is your God’?
‘But for me, I had been so strangely unsuccessful, 125the result of my efforts amounted to—Nothing. How could I believe in my strength when there was no reflection to see it in? This troubling yet, as I now realize, quite trivial question never found an answer for me: Do you have a certain talent, a certain worth that most people lack; or are you simply the biggest fool of these modern times? Alas! The terrible doubt is self-doubt; and how could I believe? Hadn’t my first and last faith in myself, when even the heavens seemed open to me and I dared to love, been cruelly betrayed? The complicated mystery of life became increasingly mysterious to me: I hadn’t made any progress in the practical aspects, but was instead beaten, thwarted, and scornfully rejected everywhere. A weak individual in the midst of a threatening infinity, it seemed all I had were my eyes to witness my own misery. Invisible yet impenetrable walls, like enchantment, separated me from all living beings: was there, in this vast world, any true friend I could trust? Oh heaven, no, there was none! I kept my mouth shut: why should I speak much to that ever-changing variety of so-called friends, whose withered, shallow, and overly hungry souls viewed friendship as merely an unbelievable tradition? In such cases, it’s best to talk little, and that little mostly from the newspapers. Now, looking back, it was truly a strange isolation I lived in. The men and women around me, even when speaking to me, were merely figures; I had practically forgotten they were alive, that they weren’t just automaton. Amid their crowded streets and gatherings, I walked alone; and (except for the fact that I was consuming my own heart, not someone else's) I was fierce, like a tiger in its jungle. It would have been somewhat comforting if I could, like Faust, have imagined myself tempted and tormented by the Devil; because a hell, as I see it, without life, even if it were diabolical, would be more horrifying: but in our age of doubt and disbelief, even the Devil has been torn down, you can't even muster enough belief in a Devil. To me, the universe felt utterly devoid of life, purpose, will, and even hostility: it was one massive, lifeless, 126immeasurable steam engine, rolling on, indifferent to grind me down to nothing. Oh, the vast, gloomy, solitary Golgotha, and Mill of Death! Why was the living cast there, alone, and conscious? Why, if there is no Devil; no, unless the Devil is your God?’
A prey incessantly to such corrosions, might not, moreover, as the worst aggravation to them, the iron constitution even of a Teufelsdröckh threaten to fail? We conjecture that he has known sickness; and, in spite of his locomotive habits, perhaps sickness of the chronic sort. Hear this, for example: ‘How beautiful to die of broken-heart, on Paper! Quite another thing in practice; every window of your Feeling, even of your Intellect, as it were, begrimed and mud-bespattered, so that no pure ray can enter; a whole Drugshop in your inwards; the fordone soul drowning slowly in quagmires of Disgust!’
A person constantly subjected to such wear and tear might, as an even worse aggravation, find the strong constitution of someone like Teufelsdröckh starting to break down. We think he has experienced illness; and despite his active lifestyle, possibly chronic illness. For instance, listen to this: 'How lovely it is to die of a broken heart, on paper! It's a completely different story in reality; every window to your feelings, even your intellect, is smudged and covered in grime, allowing no pure light to get in; your insides feel like a whole drugstore; the weary soul slowly drowning in puddles of disgust!'
Putting all which external and internal miseries together, may we not find in the following sentences, quite in our Professor’s still vein, significance enough? ‘From Suicide a certain aftershine (Nachschein) of Christianity withheld me: perhaps also a certain indolence of character; for, was not that a remedy I had at any time within reach? Often, however, was there a question present to me: Should some one now, at the turning of that corner, blow thee suddenly out of Space, into the other World, or other No-World, by pistol-shot,—how were it? On which ground, too, I have often, in sea-storms and sieged cities and other death-scenes, exhibited an imperturbability, which passed, falsely enough, for courage.’
Putting together all the external and internal struggles, can we not find enough meaning in the following sentences, much like our Professor’s usual style? ‘A certain afterglow of Christianity held me back from suicide; maybe also a bit of laziness in my character; after all, wasn’t that a solution I could reach at any time? Yet, I often found myself wondering: if someone were to suddenly blow you out of existence, into the next world, or perhaps into nothingness, how would you feel? Because of this, I have often shown a calmness in stormy seas and besieged cities and other life-or-death situations, which was mistakenly seen as bravery.’
‘So had it lasted,’ concludes the Wanderer, ‘so had it lasted, as in bitter protracted Death-agony, through long years. The heart within me, unvisited by any heavenly dewdrop, was smouldering in sulphurous, slow-consuming fire. Almost since earliest memory I had shed no tear; or once only when I, murmuring half-audibly, recited Faust’s Deathsong, that wild Selig der den er im Siegesglanze findet (Happy whom he finds in Battle’s splendour), and thought that of this last Friend even I was not forsaken, that Destiny itself could not 127doom me not to die. Having no hope, neither had I any definite fear, were it of Man or of Devil: nay, I often felt as if it might be solacing, could the Arch-Devil himself, though in Tartarean terrors, but rise to me, that I might tell him a little of my mind. And yet, strangely enough, I lived in a continual, indefinite, pining fear; tremulous, pusillanimous, apprehensive of I knew not what: it seemed as if all things in the Heavens above and the Earth beneath would hurt me; as if the Heavens and the Earth were but boundless jaws of a devouring monster, wherein I, palpitating, waited to be devoured.
‘If only it had lasted,’ the Wanderer concludes, ‘if only it had lasted, like a bitter, drawn-out death struggle, for many years. The heart inside me, untouched by any heavenly blessing, was burning in a slow, consuming fire. Almost since my earliest memory, I hadn’t shed a single tear; or only once when I, murmuring softly, recited Faust’s Deathsong, that wild Selig der den er im Siegesglanze findet (Happy whom he finds in Battle’s splendor), and thought that even I wasn’t abandoned by this last Friend, that Fate itself could not 127 condemn me to die. Having no hope, I also had no specific fear, whether of Man or of Devil: indeed, I often felt that it might be comforting if the Arch-Devil himself, even in fiery terrors, could just come to me so that I could share a bit of my thoughts with him. Yet, strangely enough, I lived in a constant, vague, longing fear; trembling, timid, anxious about I knew not what: it felt as if everything in the Heavens above and the Earth below would harm me; as if the Heavens and the Earth were just limitless jaws of a devouring monster, where I, trembling, waited to be consumed.
‘Full of such humour, and perhaps the miserablest man in the whole French Capital or Suburbs, was I, one sultry Dog-day, after much perambulation, toiling along the dirty little Rue Saint-Thomas de l’Enfer, among civic rubbish enough, in a close atmosphere, and over pavements hot as Nebuchadnezzar’s Furnace; whereby doubtless my spirits were little cheered; when, all at once, there rose a Thought in me, and I asked myself: “What art thou afraid of? Wherefore, like a coward, dost thou forever pip and whimper, and go cowering and trembling? Despicable biped! what is the sum-total of the worst that lies before thee? Death? Well, Death; and say the pangs of Tophet too, and all that the Devil and Man may, will or can do against thee! Hast thou not a heart; canst thou not suffer whatsoever it be; and, as a Child of Freedom, though outcast, trample Tophet itself under thy feet, while it consumes thee? Let it come, then; I will meet it and defy it!” And as I so thought, there rushed like a stream of fire over my whole soul; and I shook base Fear away from me forever. I was strong, of unknown strength; a spirit, almost a god. Ever from that time, the temper of my misery was changed: not Fear or whining Sorrow was it, but Indignation and grim fire-eyed Defiance.
‘Full of such humor, and possibly the most miserable man in the entire French Capital or its suburbs, was I, one sweltering summer day, after a lot of wandering, trudging along the dirty little Rue Saint-Thomas de l’Enfer, surrounded by enough trash in a stuffy atmosphere, and over pavements as hot as Nebuchadnezzar’s Furnace; which surely didn’t lift my spirits much; when suddenly, a thought struck me, and I asked myself: “What are you afraid of? Why, like a coward, do you constantly whine and tremble? Pathetic human! what’s the worst that lies ahead? Death? Fine, Death; and let’s include the torments of hell too, along with everything that the Devil and Man can possibly do to you! Don’t you have a heart; can you not endure whatever it is; and, as a Child of Freedom, even if outcast, trample even hell itself under your feet while it consumes you? Let it come, then; I will face it and defy it!” And as I thought this, a rush of fiery energy flowed through my entire being; and I shook off base Fear forever. I felt strong, with an unknown strength; a spirit, almost a god. From that moment on, my misery transformed: it was no longer Fear or whining Sorrow, but Indignation and fierce, fire-eyed Defiance.
‘Thus had the Everlasting No (das ewige Nein) pealed authoritatively through all the recesses of my Being, of my Me; and then was it that my whole Me stood up, in native God-created majesty, and with emphasis recorded its Protest. Such a Protest, the 128most important transaction in Life, may that same Indignation and Defiance, in a psychological point of view, be fitly called. The Everlasting No had said: “Behold, thou are fatherless, outcast, and the Universe is mine (the Devil’s)”; to which my whole Me now made answer: “I am not thine, but Free, and forever hate thee!”
‘Thus had the Never-ending No (das ewige Nein) resounded authoritatively through all the depths of my Being, of my Me; and then it was that my whole Me stood up, in natural God-given majesty, and emphatically recorded its Protest. Such a Protest, the 128most important event in Life, may that same Indignation and Defiance, from a psychological perspective, be aptly called. The Everlasting No had proclaimed: “Look, you are fatherless, rejected, and the Universe belongs to me (the Devil’s)”; to which my whole Me now responded: “I am not yours, but Free, and forever hate you!”
‘It is from this hour that I incline to date my Spiritual New-birth, or Baphometic Fire-baptism; perhaps I directly thereupon began to be a Man.’
‘It is from this moment that I tend to mark the beginning of my Spiritual Rebirth, or Baphometic Fire-baptism; maybe it was right then that I truly started to become a Man.’
CHAPTER VIII
CHAPTER 8
CENTRE OF INDIFFERENCE
Though, after this ‘Baphometic Fire-baptism’ of his, our Wanderer signifies that his Unrest was but increased; as, indeed, ‘Indignation and Defiance,’ especially against things in general, are not the most peaceable inmates; yet can the Psychologist surmise that it was no longer a quite hopeless Unrest; that henceforth it had at least a fixed centre to revolve round. For the fire-baptised soul, long so scathed and thunder-riven, here feels its own Freedom, which feeling is its Baphometic Baptism: the citadel of its whole kingdom it has thus gained by assault, and will keep inexpugnable; outwards from which the remaining dominions, not indeed without hard battling, will doubtless by degrees be conquered and pacificated. Under another figure, we might say, if in that great moment, in the Rue Saint-Thomas de l’Enfer, the old inward Satanic School was not yet thrown out of doors, it received peremptory judicial notice to quit;—whereby, for the rest, its howl-chantings, Ernulphus-cursings, and rebellious gnashings of teeth, might, in the meanwhile, become only the more tumultuous, and difficult to keep secret.
Although, after this 'Baphometic Fire baptism,' our Wanderer shows that his restlessness only increased; indeed, 'Indignation and Defiance,' especially against most things, aren’t the calmest guests; yet the Psychologist might guess that it was no longer a completely hopeless unrest; from now on, it had at least a solid center to revolve around. For the fire-baptized soul, long scarred and struck by thunder, here feels its own Freedom, which is its Baphometic Baptism: it has taken the fortress of its entire kingdom by storm and will hold it tightly; from this stronghold, the remaining territories, though not without a tough fight, will surely be gradually conquered and brought to peace. In another way, we might say that if, in that crucial moment, in the Rue Saint-Thomas de l’Enfer, the old inner Satanic School was not yet kicked out, it received a firm legal notice to leave;—thus, for the time being, its howling chants, Ernulphus curses, and rebellious grinding of teeth might only grow louder and harder to keep hidden.
Accordingly, if we scrutinise these Pilgrimings well, there is perhaps discernible henceforth a certain incipient method in their madness. Not wholly as a Spectre does Teufelsdröckh now storm through the 129world; at worst as a spectre-fighting Man, nay who will one day be a Spectre-queller. If pilgriming restlessly to so many ‘Saints’ Wells,’ and ever without quenching of his thirst, he nevertheless finds little secular wells, whereby from time to time some alleviation is ministered. In a word, he is now, if not ceasing, yet intermitting to ‘eat his own heart’; and clutches round him outwardly on the Not-me for wholesomer food. Does not the following glimpse exhibit him in a much more natural state?
If we take a close look at these pilgrimages, we might start to see some kind of method behind the madness. Teufelsdröckh isn’t just rushing through the world like a ghost; at his worst, he’s a man battling spectres, and one day he’ll become a spectre-buster. While he’s restlessly searching for so many “Saints’ Wells” without ever truly quenching his thirst, he still discovers a few secular wells that provide some relief from time to time. In short, he’s not completely giving up but is taking breaks from “eating his own heart” and is reaching for the Not me for more nourishing sustenance. Doesn’t the following glimpse show him in a much more relatable state?
‘Towns also and Cities, especially the ancient, I failed not to look upon with interest. How beautiful to see thereby, as through a long vista, into the remote Time; to have, as it were, an actual section of almost the earliest Past brought safe into the Present, and set before your eyes! There, in that old City, was a live ember of Culinary Fire put down, say only two thousand years ago; and there, burning more or less triumphantly, with such fuel as the region yielded, it has burnt, and still burns, and thou thyself seest the very smoke thereof. Ah! and the far more mysterious live ember of Vital Fire was then also put down there; and still miraculously burns and spreads; and the smoke and ashes thereof (in these Judgment-Halls and Churchyards), and its bellows-engines (in these Churches), thou still seest; and its flame, looking out from every kind countenance, and every hateful one, still warms thee or scorches thee.
‘Towns and cities, especially the ancient ones, always captivated me. It’s so beautiful to see, like looking through a long tunnel, into the distant past; to have a piece of the almost earliest history brought safely into the present and laid out before you! There, in that old city, was a live ember of culinary fire placed down, say, only two thousand years ago; and there, burning more or less triumphantly, with whatever fuel the area provided, it has burned, and still burns, and you can see the very smoke from it. Ah! And the far more mysterious live ember of vital fire was also placed down there; and still miraculously burns and spreads; and the smoke and ashes of it (in these courts and graveyards), and its bellows (in these churches), you still see; and its flame, shining from every kind of face, even the most hateful, still warms or scorches you.
‘Of Man’s Activity and Attainment the chief results are aeriform, mystic, and preserved in Tradition only: such are his Forms of Government, with the Authority they rest on; his Customs, or Fashions both of Cloth-habits and of Soul-habits; much more his collective stock of Handicrafts, the whole Faculty he has acquired of manipulating Nature: all these things, as indispensable and priceless as they are, cannot in any way be fixed under lock and key, but must flit, spirit-like, on impalpable vehicles, from Father to Son; if you demand sight of them, they are nowhere to be met with. Visible Ploughmen and Hammermen there have been, ever from Cain and Tubalcain downwards: but where does your accumulated Agricultural, Metallurgic, and other 130Manufacturing Skill lie warehoused? It transmits itself on the atmospheric air, on the sun’s rays (by Hearing and by Vision); it is a thing aeriform, impalpable, of quite spiritual sort. In like manner, ask me not, Where are the Laws; where is the Government? In vain wilt thou go to Schönbrunn, to Downing Street, to the Palais Bourbon: thou findest nothing there but brick or stone houses, and some bundles of Papers tied with tape. Where, then, is that same cunningly-devised almighty Government of theirs to be laid hands on? Everywhere, yet nowhere: seen only in its works, this too is a thing aeriform, invisible; or if you will, mystic and miraculous. So spiritual (geistig) is our whole daily Life: all that we do springs out of Mystery, Spirit, invisible Force; only like a little Cloud-image, or Armida’s Palace, air-built, does the Actual body itself forth from the great mystic Deep.
‘The main outcomes of human activity and achievement are intangible, mystical, and exist only in tradition: these include systems of government and the authority behind them; customs or trends in clothing and mindsets; and especially the collective skills of craftsmanship, the entire capability we have gained to manipulate nature: all these things, as essential and invaluable as they are, cannot be securely locked away, but must float, like spirits, on elusive means from parent to child; if you ask to see them, you won’t find them anywhere. There have always been visible farmers and craftsmen, from Cain and Tubalcain onward: but where is the accumulated Agricultural, Metallurgical, and other 130Manufacturing Skill stored? It transmits itself through the air, through sunlight (by hearing and vision); it’s something ethereal, intangible, and of a truly spiritual nature. Likewise, don’t ask me, Where are the Laws; where is the Government? You’ll search in vain at Schönbrunn, Downing Street, or the Palais Bourbon: all you’ll find are brick or stone structures, and some bundles of papers tied together. Where then can you touch that clever and powerful Government? It exists everywhere yet nowhere: seen only in its results, it too is an ethereal, invisible thing; or if you prefer, mystical and miraculous. Our entire daily existence is so spiritual (geistig): everything we do emerges from mystery, spirit, invisible force; only like a small cloud or Armida’s Airy Palace does the actual world manifest itself from the great mystical depth.’
‘Visible and tangible products of the Past, again, I reckon-up to the extent of three: Cities, with their Cabinets and Arsenals; then tilled Fields, to either or to both of which divisions Roads with their Bridges may belong; and thirdly——Books. In which third truly, the last invented, lies a worth far surpassing that of the two others. Wondrous indeed is the virtue of a true Book. Not like a dead city of stones, yearly crumbling, yearly needing repair; more like a tilled field, but then a spiritual field: like a spiritual tree, let me rather say, it stands from year to year, and from age to age (we have Books that already number some hundred-and-fifty human ages); and yearly comes its new produce of leaves (Commentaries, Deductions, Philosophical, Political Systems; or were it only Sermons, Pamphlets, Journalistic Essays), every one of which is talismanic and thaumaturgic, for it can persuade men. O thou who art able to write a Book, which once in the two centuries or oftener there is a man gifted to do, envy not him whom they name City-builder, and inexpressibly pity him whom they name Conqueror or City-burner! Thou too art a Conqueror and Victor: but of the true sort, namely over the Devil: thou too hast built what will outlast all marble and metal, and be a wonder-bringing City of the Mind, a 131Temple and Seminary and Prophetic Mount, whereto all kindreds of the Earth will pilgrim.—Fool! why journeyest thou wearisomely, in thy antiquarian fervour, to gaze on the stone pyramids of Geeza, or the clay ones of Sacchara? These stand there, as I can tell thee, idle and inert, looking over the Desert, foolishly enough, for the last three-thousand years: but canst thou not open thy Hebrew Bible, then, or even Luther’s Version thereof?’
‘Visible and tangible products of the past, once again, I count up to three: Cities, with their Museums and Armories; then cultivated Fields, to either or both of which Roads with their Bridges may belong; and thirdly—Books. In that third category, which is the most recent invention, there’s a value that far exceeds the other two. The power of a true Book is truly amazing. It’s not like a dead city made of stones, crumbling away every year and needing repairs; it’s more like a cultivated field, but a spiritual one: better yet, let me say it’s like a spiritual tree, standing year after year and age after age (we have Books that have already lasted for around one hundred fifty human ages); and every year, it produces new leaves (Commentaries, Deductions, Philosophical, Political Systems; or even if it’s just Sermons, Pamphlets, Journalistic Essays), each one of which is magical and transformative, as it can persuade people. Oh, you who can write a Book, which once every couple of centuries or more often a gifted person manages to do, do not envy the one called a City-builder, and feel an immense pity for him who is called a Conqueror or a City-destroyer! You too are a Conqueror and Victor: but of the true sort, namely over evil: you too have created what will outlast all marble and metal and be a wonder-bringing City of the Mind, a 131Temple and School and Prophetic Mount, to which all the nations of the Earth will travel. —Fool! why are you laboriously journeying, in your antiquarian obsession, to gaze upon the stone pyramids of Giza, or the clay ones of Saqqara? These stand there, as I can tell you, idle and motionless, staring at the Desert, foolishly enough, for the last three thousand years: but can’t you just open your Hebrew The Bible, or even Luther’s version of it?’
No less satisfactory is his sudden appearance not in Battle, yet on some Battle-field; which, we soon gather, must be that of Wagram; so that here, for once, is a certain approximation to distinctness of date. Omitting much, let us impart what follows:
No less satisfying is his sudden appearance not in Battle, yet on some battlefield; which, we quickly realize, must be that of Wagram; so that here, for once, we have a fairly clear idea of the date. Skipping over a lot, let’s share what comes next:
‘Horrible enough! A whole Marchfeld strewed with shell-splinters, cannon-shot, ruined tumbrils, and dead men and horses; stragglers still remaining not so much as buried. And those red mould heaps: ay, there lie the Shells of Men, out of which all the Life and Virtue has been blown; and now are they swept together, and crammed-down out of sight, like blown Egg-shells!—Did Nature, when she bade the Donau bring down his mould-cargoes from the Carinthian and Carpathian Heights, and spread them out here into the softest, richest level,—intend thee, O Marchfeld, for a corn-bearing Nursery, whereon her children might be nursed; or for a Cockpit, wherein they might the more commodiously be throttled and tattered? Were thy three broad Highways, meeting here from the ends of Europe, made for Ammunition-wagons, then? Were thy Wagrams and Stillfrieds but so many ready-built Casemates, wherein the house of Hapsburg might batter with artillery, and with artillery be battered? König Ottokar, amid yonder hillocks, dies under Rodolf’s truncheon; here Kaiser Franz falls a-swoon under Napoleon’s: within which five centuries, to omit the others, how has thy breast, fair Plain, been defaced and defiled! The greensward is torn-up and trampled-down; man’s fond care of it, his fruit-trees, hedgerows, and pleasant dwellings, blown-away with gunpowder; and the kind seedfield lies a desolate, hideous Place of Sculls.—Nevertheless, Nature is at work; 132neither shall these Powder-Devilkins with their utmost devilry gainsay her: but all that gore and carnage will be shrouded-in, absorbed into manure; and next year the Marchfeld will be green, nay greener. Thrifty unwearied Nature, ever out of our great waste educing some little profit of thy own,—how dost thou, from the very carcass of the Killer, bring Life for the Living!
‘Horrible enough! A whole Marchfeld scattered with shell fragments, cannon fire, destroyed carts, and dead men and horses; stray survivors left unburied. And those red mounds: yes, there lie the shells of men, from which all life and virtue have been blown away; and now they are swept together and hidden out of sight, like blown egg shells!—Did Nature, when she instructed the Danube to bring down its soil from the Carinthian and Carpathian heights and spread it out here into the softest, richest ground,—intend you, O Marchfeld, to be a fertile nursery for her children; or a battleground where they could be conveniently slaughtered and torn apart? Were your three broad highways, meeting here from the ends of Europe, made for ammunition wagons, then? Were your Wagrams and Stillfrieds simply ready-made fortifications, where the house of Hapsburg could attack with artillery and be attacked in turn? König Ottokar, amid those hillocks, dies under Rodolf’s baton; here Kaiser Franz faints under Napoleon’s: within these five centuries, not to mention the others, how has your fair plain been marred and defiled! The green grass is torn up and trampled down; man’s care for it, his fruit trees, hedgerows, and pleasant homes, blown away with gunpowder; and the once gentle fields lie as a desolate, ugly place of skulls.—Nevertheless, Nature is at work; 132 neither shall these powder-devils with their wickedness oppose her: but all that gore and slaughter will be covered up, absorbed into fertilizer; and next year the Marchfeld will be green, even greener. Resourceful, tireless Nature, always coaxing some small benefit from our great waste—how do you, from the very carcass of the killer, bring life for the living!
‘What, speaking in quite unofficial language, is the net-purport and upshot of war? To my own knowledge, for example, there dwell and toil, in the British village of Dumdrudge, usually some five-hundred souls. From these, by certain “Natural Enemies” of the French, there are successively selected, during the French war, say thirty able-bodied men: Dumdrudge, at her own expense, has suckled and nursed them: she has, not without difficulty and sorrow, fed them up to manhood, and even trained them to crafts, so that one can weave, another build, another hammer, and the weakest can stand under thirty stone avoirdupois. Nevertheless, amid much weeping and swearing, they are selected; all dressed in red; and shipped away, at the public charges, some two-thousand miles, or say only to the south of Spain; and fed there till wanted. And now to that same spot, in the south of Spain, are thirty similar French artisans, from a French Dumdrudge, in like manner wending: till at length, after infinite effort, the two parties come into actual juxtaposition; and Thirty stands fronting Thirty, each with a gun in his hand. Straightway the word “Fire!” is given: and they blow the souls out of one another; and in place of sixty brisk useful craftsmen, the world has sixty dead carcasses, which it must bury, and anew shed tears for. Had these men any quarrel? Busy as the Devil is, not the smallest! They lived far enough apart; were the entirest strangers; nay, in so wide a Universe, there was even, unconsciously, by Commerce, some mutual helpfulness between them. How then? Simpleton! their Governors had fallen-out; and, instead of shooting one another, had the cunning to make these poor blockheads shoot.—Alas, so is it in Deutschland, and hitherto in all other lands; still as of old, “what devilry soever Kings do, the Greeks must pay the 133piper!”—In that fiction of the English Smollet, it is true, the final Cessation of War is perhaps prophetically shadowed forth; where the two Natural Enemies, in person, take each a Tobacco-pipe, filled with Brimstone; light the same, and smoke in one another’s faces, till the weaker gives in: but from such predicted Peace-Era, what blood-filled trenches, and contentious centuries, may still divide us!’
‘What, to put it bluntly, is the real meaning and outcome of war? For instance, in the British village of Dumdrudge, there are usually about five hundred people. From this group, during the French war, about thirty able-bodied men are chosen by certain “natural enemies” of the French. Dumdrudge has raised and cared for them, putting in a lot of effort and love to help them grow up, even training them in various trades so that one can weave, another can build, another can forge, and even the weakest can carry a heavy weight. Yet, amid a lot of tears and cursing, they are picked, all dressed in red, and sent off at public expense, two thousand miles away, or just to the south of Spain, where they are kept fed until they are needed. At the same time, there are thirty similar French craftsmen from a French version of Dumdrudge making their way to the same place in southern Spain. Eventually, after immense effort, the two groups find themselves face to face; and thirty confront thirty, each holding a gun. Immediately the order “Fire!” is given, and they shoot each other dead; instead of sixty skilled and useful workers, the world is left with sixty dead bodies, which must be buried, and for which tears will be shed again. Did these men have any conflict? Not a bit! They were far apart, complete strangers; in fact, there was even some unconscious mutual benefit between them through trade. So, what happened? You silly fool! Their rulers had fallen out; and instead of fighting each other, they cleverly got these poor simpletons to do the fighting for them. Alas, it’s the same in Germany and in every other country; as always, “whatever madness Kings conceive, the common people pay the price!” In that fiction by the English writer Smollett, it’s true—the ultimate end of war might be prophetically suggested, where the two natural enemies each take a tobacco pipe filled with brimstone, light them, and smoke in each other’s faces until one gives in. But from that predicted age of peace, what bloody battlefields and centuries filled with conflict still lie ahead of us!’
Thus can the Professor, at least in lucid intervals, look away from his own sorrows, over the many-coloured world, and pertinently enough note what is passing there. We may remark, indeed, that for the matter of spiritual culture, if for nothing else, perhaps few periods of his life were richer than this. Internally, there is the most momentous instructive Course of Practical Philosophy, with Experiments, going on; towards the right comprehension of which his Peripatetic habits, favourable to Meditation, might help him rather than hinder. Externally, again, as he wanders to and fro, there are, if for the longing heart little substance, yet for the seeing eye sights enough: in these so boundless Travels of his, granting that the Satanic School was even partially kept down, what an incredible knowledge of our Planet, and its Inhabitants and their Works, that is to say, of all knowable things, might not Teufelsdröckh acquire!
So, during his clearer moments, the Professor can look past his own troubles and observe the vibrant world around him, taking note of what’s happening. We could say that in terms of spiritual growth, maybe few times in his life were as enriching as this. Internally, he is experiencing a significant and enlightening Course of Practical Philosophy, complete with experiments; his walking habits, which are good for reflection, might actually support his understanding rather than get in the way. Externally, as he meanders around, there may be little substance for the yearning heart, but there are plenty of sights for the observing eye: throughout his expansive journeys, assuming the dark influences around him were kept somewhat in check, what incredible knowledge of our planet, its inhabitants, and their creations—essentially, of all things knowable—could Teufelsdröckh gain!
‘I have read in most Public Libraries,’ says he, ‘including those of Constantinople and Samarcand: in most Colleges, except the Chinese Mandarin ones, I have studied, or seen that there was no studying. Unknown Languages have I oftenest gathered from their natural repertory, the Air, by my organ of Hearing; Statistics, Geographics, Topographics came, through the Eye, almost of their own accord. The ways of Man, how he seeks food, and warmth, and protection for himself, in most regions, are ocularly known to me. Like the great Hadrian, I meted-out much of the terraqueous Globe with a pair of Compasses that belonged to myself only.
‘I’ve read in most public libraries,’ he says, ‘including ones in Constantinople and Samarkand; I’ve studied in most colleges, except for the Chinese Mandarin ones, where I observed there was no studying going on. I’ve often picked up unknown languages from their natural source, the air, through my sense of hearing. Statistics, geography, and topography came to me almost effortlessly through my eyes. I’ve visually learned about how people seek food, warmth, and shelter in most regions. Like the great Hadrian, I measured a lot of the earth with a pair of compasses that belonged solely to me.
‘Of great Scenes why speak? Three summer days, I lingered reflecting, and even composing (dichtete), by the Pinechasms of Vaucluse; and in that clear Lakelet 134moistened my bread. I have sat under the Palm-trees of Tadmor; smoked a pipe among the ruins of Babylon. The great Wall of China I have seen; and can testify that it is of gray brick, coped and covered with granite, and shows only second-rate masonry.—Great Events, also, have not I witnessed? Kings sweated-down (ausgemergelt) into Berlin-and-Milan Customhouse-Officers; the World well won, and the World well lost; oftener than once a hundred-thousand individuals shot (by each other) in one day. All kindreds and peoples and nations dashed together, and shifted and shovelled into heaps, that they might ferment there, and in time unite. The birth-pangs of Democracy, wherewith convulsed Europe was groaning in cries that reached Heaven, could not escape me.
‘Why talk about great scenes? I spent three summer days reflecting and even composing by the pine groves of Vaucluse; and in that clear little lake, I soaked my bread. I have sat under the palm trees of Tadmor and smoked a pipe among the ruins of Babylon. I’ve seen the Great Wall of China and can confirm that it’s made of gray brick, topped and covered with granite, and shows only mediocre craftsmanship. —I have also witnessed great events. Kings brought low by customs officers in Berlin and Milan; the world gained and the world lost; more than once, a hundred thousand people shot by each other in a single day. All kinds of families, peoples, and nations collided, mixed, and piled together so they could ferment and eventually unite. The birth pangs of Democracy, which convulsed Europe, echoed with cries that reached Heaven, and I couldn’t avoid noticing them.
‘For great Men I have ever had the warmest predilection; and can perhaps boast that few such in this era have wholly escaped me. Great Men are the inspired (speaking and acting) Texts of that divine Book of Revelations, whereof a Chapter is completed from epoch to epoch, and by some named History; to which inspired Texts your numerous talented men, and your innumerable untalented men, are the better or worse exegetic Commentaries, and wagonload of too-stupid, heretical or orthodox, weekly Sermons. For my study the inspired Texts themselves! Thus did not I, in very early days, having disguised me as tavern-waiter, stand behind the field-chairs, under that shady Tree at Treisnitz by the Jena Highway; waiting upon the great Schiller and greater Goethe; and hearing what I have not forgotten. For——’
‘I've always had a deep fondness for great people and can confidently say that few have completely eluded my attention in this time. Great people are the inspired (speaking and acting) texts of that divine Book of Revelation, which has a chapter that unfolds from era to era, and some call History; to which those inspired texts are the better or worse interpretative commentaries from your many talented individuals, along with countless untalented ones, and a load of overly simplistic, heretical or orthodox, weekly sermons. What I seek is the inspired texts themselves! So, in my early days, disguised as a tavern waiter, I stood behind the field chairs under that shady tree at Treisnitz by the Jena Highway, serving the great Schiller and the even greater Goethe, and hearing things I haven't forgotten. For——’
——But at this point the Editor recalls his principle of caution, some time ago laid down, and must suppress much. Let not the sacredness of Laurelled, still more, of Crowned Heads, be tampered with. Should we, at a future day, find circumstances altered, and the time come for Publication, then may these glimpses into the privacy of the Illustrious be conceded; which for the present were little better than treacherous, perhaps traitorous Eavesdroppings. Of Lord Byron, therefore, of Pope Pius, Emperor Tarakwang, and the ‘White Water-roses’ (Chinese Carbonari) with their mysteries, 135no notice here! Of Napoleon himself we shall only, glancing from afar, remark that Teufelsdröckh’s relation to him seems to have been of very varied character. At first we find our poor Professor on the point of being shot as a spy; then taken into private conversation, even pinched on the ear, yet presented with no money; at last indignantly dismissed, almost thrown out of doors, as an ‘Ideologist.’ ‘He himself,’ says the Professor, ‘was among the completest Ideologists, at least Ideopraxists: in the Idea (in der Idee) he lived, moved and fought. The man was a Divine Missionary, though unconscious of it; and preached, through the cannon’s throat, that great doctrine, La carrière ouverte aux talens (The Tools to him that can handle them), which is our ultimate Political Evangel, wherein alone can liberty lie. Madly enough he preached, it is true, as Enthusiasts and first Missionaries are wont, with imperfect utterance, amid much frothy rant; yet as articulately perhaps as the case admitted. Or call him, if you will, an American Backwoodsman, who had to fell unpenetrated forests, and battle with innumerable wolves, and did not entirely forbear strong liquor, rioting, and even theft; whom, notwithstanding, the peaceful Sower will follow, and, as he cuts the boundless harvest, bless.’
——But at this point, the Editor remembers the principle of caution he established some time ago and must hold back a lot. Let not the sanctity of laurelled, and even more so, crowned heads be disturbed. If, in the future, circumstances change and the time comes for publication, then these glimpses into the private lives of the illustrious may be permitted; which for now are hardly better than treacherous, maybe even traitorous, eavesdropping. As for Lord Byron, Pope Pius, Emperor Tarakwang, and the ‘White Water-roses’ (Chinese Carbonari) with their secrets, 135 there will be no mention here! Regarding Napoleon himself, we will only note from a distance that Teufelsdröckh’s relationship with him seems to have been quite varied. Initially, we find our poor Professor on the brink of being shot as a spy; then he is taken for a private conversation, even pinched on the ear, yet not given any money; finally, he is indignantly dismissed, nearly thrown out the door, as an ‘Ideologist.’ ‘He himself,’ says the Professor, ‘was among the most complete Ideologists, or at least Ideopraxists: in the Idea (in der Idee) he lived, moved, and struggled. The man was a Divine Missionary, though unaware of it; and preached, through the cannon’s roar, that great doctrine, La carrière ouverte aux talens (The Tools to him that can handle them), which is our ultimate political gospel, where alone liberty can be found. Madly enough, he preached, it is true, as Enthusiasts and first Missionaries tend to do, with imperfect expression, amid much frothy rant; yet perhaps as articulately as the situation allowed. Or call him, if you like, an American Backwoodsman, who had to clear untouched forests and battle countless wolves, and did not completely abstain from strong liquor, partying, and even theft; whom, despite this, the peaceful Sower will follow and, as he reaps the boundless harvest, bless.’
More legitimate and decisively authentic is Teufelsdröckh’s appearance and emergence (we know not well whence) in the solitude of the North Cape, on that June Midnight. He has ‘a light-blue Spanish cloak’ hanging round him, as his ‘most commodious, principal, indeed sole upper garment’; and stands there, on the World-promontory, looking over the infinite Brine, like a little blue Belfry (as we figure), now motionless indeed, yet ready, if stirred, to ring quaintest changes.
Teufelsdröckh’s arrival and presence (we aren’t sure exactly where he came from) at the remote North Cape on that June midnight feels more genuine and distinctly real. He’s wearing “a light-blue Spanish cloak,” which is basically his only outer garment, standing there on the edge of the world, gazing out at the endless sea, like a little blue bell tower (as we imagine), completely still for now, but if he were to be moved, he’d be ready to chime out the most unusual sounds.
‘Silence as of death,’ writes he; ‘for Midnight, even in the Arctic latitudes, has its character: nothing but the granite cliffs ruddy-tinged, the peaceable gurgle of that slow-heaving Polar Ocean, over which in the utmost North the great Sun hangs low and lazy, as if he too were slumbering. Yet is his cloud-couch wrought of crimson and cloth-of-gold; yet does his light 136stream over the mirror of waters, like a tremulous fire-pillar, shooting downwards to the abyss, and hide itself under my feet. In such moments, Solitude also is invaluable; for who would speak, or be looked on, when behind him lies all Europe and Africa, fast asleep, except the watchmen; and before him the silent Immensity, and Palace of the Eternal, whereof our Sun is but a porch-lamp?
‘Silence like death,’ he writes; ‘for Midnight, even in the Arctic regions, has its own vibe: just the granite cliffs glowing with a reddish hue, the calm gurgle of that slow-moving Polar Ocean, over which in the far North the huge Sun hangs low and sluggish, as if he too were asleep. Yet his cloud-couch is made of crimson and cloth-of-gold; still, his light 136streams across the water's surface like a flickering fire-pillar, shooting down toward the depths, hiding itself beneath my feet. In such moments, Solitude is also priceless; for who would want to talk or be watched when behind him lies all of Europe and Africa, fast asleep, except for the watchkeepers; and before him, the silent Vastness, and Palace of the Eternal, of which our Sun is just a porch light?
‘Nevertheless, in this solemn moment comes a man, or monster, scrambling from among the rock-hollows; and, shaggy, huge as the Hyperborean Bear, hails me in Russian speech: most probably, therefore, a Russian Smuggler. With courteous brevity, I signify my indifference to contraband trade, my humane intentions, yet strong wish to be private. In vain: the monster, counting doubtless on his superior stature, and minded to make sport for himself, or perhaps profit, were it with murder, continues to advance; ever assailing me with his importunate train-oil breath; and now has advanced, till we stand both on the verge of the rock, the deep Sea rippling greedily down below. What argument will avail? On the thick Hyperborean, cherubic reasoning, seraphic eloquence were lost. Prepared for such extremity, I, deftly enough, whisk aside one step; draw out, from my interior reservoirs, a sufficient Birmingham Horse-pistol, and say, “Be so obliging as retire, Friend (Er ziehe sich zurück, Freund), and with promptitude!” This logic even the Hyperborean understands; fast enough, with apologetic, petitionary growl, he sidles off; and, except for suicidal as well as homicidal purposes, need not return.
‘Nevertheless, in this serious moment, a man—or maybe a monster—climbs out from among the rock hollows; shaggy and as huge as the Hyperborean Bear, he greets me in Russian: most likely, a Russian smuggler. With polite brevity, I show my disinterest in smuggling, express my kind intentions, and my strong desire for privacy. In vain: the monster, counting on his bigger size and wanting to amuse himself—perhaps even profit, even if it means murder—keeps moving closer. He constantly assaults me with his overwhelming train-oil breath and now stands right at the edge of the rock, the deep sea rippling hungrily below. What argument can convince him? In the thick-headed Hyperborean, even angelic reasoning and eloquent speech would be useless. Ready for such a situation, I quickly take a step back, pull out a sufficient Birmingham horse pistol from my inner reserves, and say, “Please be so kind as to back off, Friend (Er ziehe sich zurück, Freund), and do it quickly!” This logic even the Hyperborean gets; with a hasty, apologetic growl, he sidles away, and unless it's for suicidal or murderous reasons, he shouldn’t come back.
‘Such I hold to be the genuine use of Gunpowder: that it makes all men alike tall. Nay, if thou be cooler, cleverer than I, if thou have more Mind, though all but no Body whatever, then canst thou kill me first, and art the taller. Hereby, at last, is the Goliath powerless, and the David resistless; savage Animalism is nothing, inventive Spiritualism is all.
‘This is what I believe is the true purpose of gunpowder: it makes everyone equally tall. Even if you’re cooler, smarter than I am, if you have more mind, even if you lack physical strength, you can still defeat me first, and therefore you’re the taller one. In this way, Goliath is rendered powerless, while David is unstoppable; raw instincts matter little, while creative thought is everything.’
‘With respect to Duels, indeed, I have my own ideas. Few things, in this so surprising world, strike me with more surprise. Two little visual Spectra of men, hovering with insecure enough cohesion in the midst of the 137Unfathomable, and to dissolve therein, at any rate, very soon,—make pause at the distance of twelve paces asunder; whirl round; and, simultaneously by the cunningest mechanism, explode one another into Dissolution; and off-hand become Air, and Non-extant! Deuce on it (verdammt), the little spitfires!—Nay, I think with old Hugo von Trimberg: “God must needs laugh outright, could such a thing be, to see his wondrous Manikins here below.”’
‘As for duels, I definitely have my own thoughts on that. Few things in this surprisingly strange world amaze me more. Two tiny images of men, barely holding together in the midst of the 137Incomprehensible, and about to dissolve there, sooner rather than later,—they stop at a distance of twelve paces apart; spin around; and then, with the cleverest mechanism, blow each other to bits; instantly turning into air and ceasing to exist! Damn it (verdammt), those little hotheads!—I agree with old Hugo von Trimberg: “God must surely laugh out loud if such a thing happens, to see his marvelous little puppets down here.”’
But amid these specialties, let us not forget the great generality, which is our chief quest here: How prospered the inner man of Teufelsdröckh under so much outward shifting? Does Legion still lurk in him, though repressed; or has he exorcised that Devil’s Brood? We can answer that the symptoms continue promising. Experience is the grand spiritual Doctor; and with him Teufelsdröckh has now been long a patient, swallowing many a bitter bolus. Unless our poor Friend belong to the numerous class of Incurables, which seems not likely, some cure will doubtless be effected. We should rather say that Legion, or the Satanic School, was now pretty well extirpated and cast out, but next to nothing introduced in its room; whereby the heart remains, for the while, in a quiet but no comfortable state.
But among these specifics, let's not overlook the bigger picture, which is our main focus here: How did Teufelsdröckh's inner self fare through all this outward change? Does that inner turmoil still linger within him, even if it's suppressed; or has he successfully gotten rid of that inner chaos? We can say that the signs look promising. Experience is the ultimate spiritual healer; and Teufelsdröckh has been a patient of this healer for a long time, enduring many tough challenges. Unless our poor friend is among the countless people who are hopeless cases, which seems unlikely, some healing will surely happen. We might say that that inner turmoil, or the negative influences, have largely been removed, but very little has taken their place; thus the heart remains in a calm but uncomfortable state for now.
‘At length, after so much roasting,’ thus writes our Autobiographer, ‘I was what you might name calcined. Pray only that it be not rather, as is the more frequent issue, reduced to a caput-mortuum! But in any case, by mere dint of practice, I had grown familiar with many things. Wretchedness was still wretched; but I could now partly see through it, and despise it. Which highest mortal, in this inane Existence, had I not found a Shadow-hunter, or Shadow-hunted; and, when I looked through his brave garnitures, miserable enough? Thy wishes have all been sniffed aside, thought I: but what, had they even been all granted! Did not the Boy Alexander weep because he had not two Planets to conquer; or a whole Solar System; or after that, a whole Universe? Ach Gott, when I gazed into these Stars, have they not looked down on me as 138if with pity, from their serene spaces; like Eyes glistening with heavenly tears over the little lot of man! Thousands of human generations, all as noisy as our own, have been swallowed-up of Time, and there remains no wreck of them any more; and Arcturus and Orion and Sirius and the Pleiades are still shining in their courses, clear and young, as when the Shepherd first noted them in the plain of Shinar. Pshaw! what is this paltry little Dog-cage of an Earth; what art thou that sittest whining there? Thou art still Nothing, Nobody: true; but who, then, is Something, Somebody? For thee the Family of Man has no use; it rejects thee; thou art wholly as a dissevered limb: so be it; perhaps it is better so!’
‘Eventually, after so much suffering,’ our Autobiographer writes, ‘I was what you might call burnt out. Let’s just hope I’m not, as often happens, reduced to a waste product! But in any case, through sheer experience, I had become accustomed to many things. Misery was still miserable; but I could now somewhat see through it and look down on it. Which great person, in this pointless existence, hasn’t been a Shadow-hunter or been hunted by one? And when I looked past his brave facade, wasn’t he just as miserable? Your wishes have all been ignored, I thought: but even if they had all been granted, what then! Didn’t the Boy Alexander weep because he didn’t have two planets to conquer, or a whole solar system, or later, an entire universe? Oh God, when I looked at these stars, didn’t they seem to gaze down at me as if with pity, from their calm spaces; like eyes shining with heavenly tears over the small fate of humanity! Thousands of human generations, as noisy as our own, have been devoured by time, leaving no trace behind; yet Arcturus, Orion, Sirius, and the Pleiades still shine brightly on their paths, clear and youthful, just as when the Shepherd first observed them in the plain of Shinar. Ugh! what is this trivial little doghouse of an Earth; what are you doing sitting there whining? You are still Nothing, Nobody: true; but then, who is Something, Somebody? For you, the Family of Man has no purpose; it rejects you; you are entirely like a severed limb: so be it; maybe that’s for the best!’
Too-heavy-laden Teufelsdröckh! Yet surely his bands are loosening; one day he will hurl the burden far from him, and bound forth free and with a second youth.
Too heavy-laden Teufelsdröckh! But surely his bands are loosening; one day he will throw the burden far from him, and leap forth free and with a renewed youth.
‘This,’ says our Professor, ‘was the Centre of Indifference I had now reached; through which whoso travels from the Negative Pole to the Positive must necessarily pass.’
‘This,’ says our Professor, ‘was the Center of Indifference I had now reached; through which anyone traveling from the Negative Pole to the Positive must necessarily pass.’
CHAPTER IX
CHAPTER 9
THE EVERLASTING YEA
‘Temptations in the Wilderness!’ exclaims Teufelsdröckh: ‘Have we not all to be tried with such? Not so easily can the old Adam, lodged in us by birth, be dispossessed. Our Life is compassed round with Necessity; yet is the meaning of Life itself no other than Freedom, than Voluntary Force: thus have we a warfare; in the beginning, especially, a hard-fought battle. For the God-given mandate, Work thou in Welldoing, lies mysteriously written, in Promethean Prophetic Characters, in our hearts; and leaves us no rest, night or day, till it be deciphered and obeyed; till it burn forth, in our conduct, a visible, acted Gospel of Freedom. And as the clay-given mandate, Eat thou 139and be filled, at the same time persuasively proclaims itself through every nerve,—must not there be a confusion, a contest, before the better Influence can become the upper?
Temptations in the Wilderness!’ exclaims Teufelsdröckh: ‘Don’t we all have to face these? The old Adam, instilled in us from birth, is not so easily gotten rid of. Our lives are surrounded by Necessity; yet, the true meaning of life itself is nothing other than Freedom, than Voluntary Force. This is our struggle; especially in the beginning, it's a hard-fought battle. The God-given command, Work thou in Welldoing, is mysteriously inscribed, in prophetic, Promethean letters, in our hearts; and it gives us no rest, day or night, until it is understood and followed; until it shines forth, in our actions, as a visible, lived-out Gospel of Freedom. And just as the basic command, Eat thou 139 and be filled, simultaneously calls to us through every nerve—mustn't there be confusion, a struggle, before the better Influence can prevail?
‘To me nothing seems more natural than that the Son of Man, when such God-given mandate first prophetically stirs within him, and the Clay must now be vanquished, or vanquish,—should be carried of the spirit into grim Solitudes, and there fronting the Tempter do grimmest battle with him; defiantly setting him at naught, till he yield and fly. Name it as we choose: with or without visible Devil, whether in the natural Desert of rocks and sands, or in the populous moral Desert of selfishness and baseness,—to such Temptation are we all called. Unhappy if we are not! Unhappy if we are but Half-men, in whom that divine handwriting has never blazed forth, all-subduing, in true sun-splendour; but quivers dubiously amid meaner lights: or smoulders, in dull pain, in darkness, under earthly vapours!—Our Wilderness is the wide World in an Atheistic Century; our Forty Days are long years of suffering and fasting: nevertheless, to these also comes an end. Yes, to me also was given, if not Victory, yet the consciousness of Battle, and the resolve to persevere therein while life or faculty is left. To me also, entangled in the enchanted forests, demon-peopled, doleful of sight and of sound, it was given, after weariest wanderings, to work out my way into the higher sunlit slopes—of that Mountain which has no summit, or whose summit is in Heaven only!’
‘To me, nothing feels more natural than that the Son of Man, when this God-given calling first stirs within him and the Clay must now be defeated or conquer, should be taken by the spirit into desolate places, and there face the Tempter in the toughest battle; defiantly disregarding him until he submits and retreats. Call it whatever we want: with or without a visible Devil, whether in the natural Desert of rocks and sand or in the crowded moral Desert of selfishness and corruption — we are all called to such Temptation. How unfortunate if we are not! How unfortunate if we are merely Half-men, in whom that divine message has never shone brightly, fully, in true sunlight; but flickers uncertainly under lesser lights: or smolders, in dull pain, in darkness, beneath earthly mists! — Our Wilderness is the vast World in an Atheistic Century; our Forty Days are long years of suffering and fasting: still, this too shall come to an end. Yes, I too was granted, if not Victory, then the awareness of Battle, and the determination to keep fighting while I have life or skills left. To me too, caught in the enchanted forests, filled with demons, agonizing in sight and sound, it was given, after exhausting wanderings, to find my way to the higher sunlit slopes — of that Mountain which has no peak, or whose peak is only in Heaven!’
He says elsewhere, under a less ambitious figure; as figures are, once for all, natural to him: ‘Has not thy Life been that of most sufficient men (tüchtigen Männer) thou hast known in this generation? An out-flush of foolish young Enthusiasm, like the first fallow-crop, wherein are as many weeds as valuable herbs: this all parched away, under the Droughts of practical and spiritual Unbelief, as Disappointment, in thought and act, often-repeated gave rise to Doubt, and Doubt gradually settled into Denial! If I have had a second-crop, and now see the perennial greensward, and sit under umbrageous cedars, which defy all Drought (and 140Doubt); herein too, be the Heavens praised, I am not without examples, and even exemplars.’
He mentions elsewhere, using a simpler example since that’s just how he thinks: ‘Has your life not been like that of most capable people you’ve known in this generation? A burst of foolish youthful enthusiasm, like the first harvest, filled with just as many weeds as valuable plants: this all dried up under the challenges of practical and spiritual disbelief, as frustration, in both thought and action, repeatedly led to doubt, and doubt eventually turned into denial! If I have experienced a second harvest and now see the lush greens and sit under shady cedars that withstand all dryness (and doubt); for this, too, let heaven be praised, I have not been without examples, and even role models.’
So that, for Teufelsdröckh also, there has been a ‘glorious revolution’: these mad shadow-hunting and shadow-hunted Pilgrimings of his were but some purifying ‘Temptation in the Wilderness,’ before his Apostolic work (such as it was) could begin; which Temptation is now happily over, and the Devil once more worsted! Was ‘that high moment in the Rue de l’Enfer,’ then, properly the turning-point of the battle; when the Fiend said, Worship me or be torn in shreds; and was answered valiantly with an Apage Satana?—Singular Teufelsdröckh, would thou hadst told thy singular story in plain words! But it is fruitless to look there, in those Paper-bags, for such. Nothing but innuendoes, figurative crotchets: a typical Shadow, fitfully wavering, prophetico-satiric; no clear logical Picture. ‘How paint to the sensual eye,’ asks he once, ‘what passes in the Holy-of-Holies of Man’s Soul; in what words, known to these profane times, speak even afar-off of the unspeakable?’ We ask in turn: Why perplex these times, profane as they are, with needless obscurity, by omission and by commission? Not mystical only is our Professor, but whimsical; and involves himself, now more than ever, in eye-bewildering chiaroscuro. Successive glimpses, here faithfully imparted, our more gifted readers must endeavour to combine for their own behoof.
So for Teufelsdröckh, there has also been a 'glorious revolution': these wild quests for shadows and being hunted by them were just some purifying 'Temptation in the Wilderness' before his Apostolic work (whatever that was) could start; and now that Temptation is finally over, and the Devil has once again been defeated! Was 'that pivotal moment in the Rue de l’Enfer' the actual turning point in the battle; when the Fiend said, Worship me or be torn to pieces; and was answered bravely with an Apage Satana?—Oh, singular Teufelsdröckh, if only you had shared your unique story in straightforward language! But it's pointless to search for that in those Paper-bags. There’s nothing but innuendos, figurative quirks: a typical Shadow, fitfully flickering, prophetically satirical; no clear logical Picture. 'How can I illustrate to the sensual eye,' he asks once, 'what occurs in the Holy-of-Holies of Man’s Soul; in what words, familiar to these secular times, can I even vaguely describe the indescribable?' We, in turn, ask: Why confuse these times, as secular as they are, with unnecessary obscurity, both by omission and commission? Our Professor is not just mystical but whimsical; and he now entangles himself even more in eye-baffling chiaroscuro. Successive insights, faithfully shared here, our more talented readers must try to piece together for their own benefit.
He says: ‘The hot Harmattan wind had raged itself out; its howl went silent within me; and the long-deafened soul could now hear. I paused in my wild wanderings; and sat me down to wait, and consider; for it was as if the hour of change drew nigh. I seemed to surrender, to renounce utterly, and say: Fly, then, false shadows of Hope; I will chase you no more, I will believe you no more. And ye too, haggard spectres of Fear, I care not for you; ye too are all shadows and a lie. Let me rest here: for I am way-weary and life-weary; I will rest here, were it but to die: to die or to live is alike to me; alike insignificant.’—And again: ‘Here, then, as I lay in that Centre of Indifference; cast, doubtless by benignant upper Influence, into a 141healing sleep, the heavy dreams rolled gradually away, and I awoke to a new Heaven and a new Earth. The first preliminary moral Act, Annihilation of Self (Selbst-tödtung), had been happily accomplished; and my mind’s eyes were now unsealed, and its hands ungyved.’
He says: ‘The hot Harmattan wind had blown itself out; its howl was silent inside me; and my long-deafened soul could now hear. I stopped my wild wandering and sat down to wait and think; it felt like the hour of change was approaching. I seemed to surrender completely, to give up, and say: Go away, false shadows of Hope; I won't chase you anymore, I won't believe in you anymore. And you too, worn-out ghosts of Fear, I don’t care about you; you’re just shadows and lies. Let me rest here because I’m tired of the journey and tired of life; I will rest here, even if it's just to die: to die or to live is the same to me; both feel insignificant.’—And again: ‘Here, then, as I lay in that Center of Indifference; likely cast there by some kind upper Influence, into a 141healing sleep, the heavy dreams gradually faded away, and I woke up to a new Heaven and a new Earth. The first essential moral Act, Annihilation of Self (Selbst-tödtung), had been successfully achieved; and my mind’s eyes were now opened, and its hands freed.’
Might we not also conjecture that the following passage refers to his Locality, during this same ‘healing sleep’; that his Pilgrim-staff lies cast aside here, on ‘the high table-land’; and indeed that the repose is already taking wholesome effect on him? If it were not that the tone, in some parts, has more of riancy, even of levity, than we could have expected! However, in Teufelsdröckh, there is always the strangest Dualism: light dancing, with guitar-music, will be going on in the fore-court, while by fits from within comes the faint whimpering of woe and wail. We transcribe the piece entire:
Might we also guess that the following passage refers to his location during this same ‘healing sleep’; that his pilgrim staff is lying abandoned here on ‘the high table-land’; and indeed that this rest is already having a beneficial effect on him? If it weren't for the fact that the tone, in some parts, has more of a cheerful, even carefree, vibe than we would have expected! However, in Teufelsdröckh, there is always the strangest duality: lighthearted dancing with guitar music will be happening in the courtyard, while inside, at times, we hear the faint sounds of sorrow and lament. We transcribe the piece in full:
‘Beautiful it was to sit there, as in my skyey Tent, musing and meditating; on the high table-land, in front of the Mountains; over me, as roof, the azure Dome, and around me, for walls, four azure-flowing curtains,—namely, of the Four azure winds, on whose bottom-fringes also I have seen gilding. And then to fancy the fair Castles that stood sheltered in these Mountain hollows; with their green flower-lawns, and white dames and damosels, lovely enough: or better still, the straw-roofed Cottages, wherein stood many a Mother baking bread, with her children round her:—all hidden and protectingly folded-up in the valley-folds; yet there and alive, as sure as if I beheld them. Or to see, as well as fancy, the nine Towns and Villages, that lay round my mountain-seat, which, in still weather, were wont to speak to me (by their steeple-bells) with metal tongue; and, in almost all weather, proclaimed their vitality by repeated Smoke-clouds; whereon, as on a culinary horologe, I might read the hour of the day. For it was the smoke of cookery, as kind housewives at morning, midday, eventide, were boiling their husbands’ kettles; and ever a blue pillar rose up into the air, successively or simultaneously, from each of the nine, saying, as plainly as smoke could say: Such and such a meal is getting ready here. Not uninteresting! For 142you have the whole Borough, with all its love-makings and scandal-mongeries, contentions and contentments, as in miniature, and could cover it all with your hat.—If, in my wide Wayfarings, I had learned to look into the business of the World in its details, here perhaps was the place for combining it into general propositions, and deducing inferences therefrom.
‘It was beautiful to sit there, like in my sky-like tent, thinking and reflecting; on the high plateau, in front of the Mountains; above me, like a roof, the blue sky, and around me, as walls, four flowing blue curtains—namely, the Four blue winds, whose bottom edges I've seen shimmer. And then to imagine the lovely castles nestled in these mountain valleys; with their green flower lawns, and white ladies and maidens, beautiful enough; or even better, the thatched-roof cottages where many a mother was baking bread, with her children around her:—all hidden and safely tucked away in the valley folds; yet there and alive, as sure as if I could see them. Or to see, as well as imagine, the nine towns and villages that surrounded my mountain spot, which, in calm weather, would communicate with me (through their steeple bells) with a metallic voice; and, in almost any weather, showed their life by curling smoke clouds; on which, like a cooking clock, I could tell the time of day. For it was the smoke of cooking, as kind housewives in the morning, noon, and evening were boiling their husbands’ kettles; and always a blue pillar would rise up into the air, one after another or all at once, from each of the nine, clearly saying, as only smoke could say: Such and such a meal is being prepared here. Not uninteresting! For 142 you have the entire Borough, with all its loves and scandals, conflicts and joys, like in miniature, and could cover it all with your hat.—If, in my extensive travels, I had learned to look into the workings of the World in its details, here perhaps was the place to bring it all together into general ideas and draw conclusions from that.
‘Often also could I see the black Tempest marching in anger through the Distance: round some Schreckhorn, as yet grim-blue, would the eddying vapour gather, and there tumultuously eddy, and flow down like a mad witch’s hair; till, after a space, it vanished, and, in the clear sunbeam, your Schreckhorn stood smiling grim-white, for the vapour had held snow. How thou fermentest and elaboratest, in thy great fermenting-vat and laboratory of an Atmosphere, of a World, O Nature!—Or what is Nature? Ha! why do I not name thee God? Art not thou the “Living Garment of God”? O Heavens, is it, in very deed, He, then, that ever speaks through thee; that lives and loves in thee, that lives and loves in me?
‘Often I could see the black storm marching in anger through the distance: around some Schreckhorn, still grim-blue, the swirling mist would gather and tumultuously swirl and flow down like a mad witch’s hair; until, after a while, it disappeared, and in the clear sunlight, your Schreckhorn stood smiling grim-white, for the mist had held snow. How you ferment and elaborate, in your great fermenting vat and laboratory of an atmosphere, of a world, O Nature!—Or what is Nature? Ha! why do I not call you God? Are you not the “Living Garment of God”? O Heavens, is it truly He that ever speaks through you; that lives and loves in you, that lives and loves in me?
‘Fore-shadows, call them rather fore-splendours, of that Truth, and Beginning of Truths, fell mysteriously over my soul. Sweeter than Dayspring to the Shipwrecked in Nova Zembla; ah, like the mother’s voice to her little child that strays bewildered, weeping, in unknown tumults; like soft streamings of celestial music to my too-exasperated heart, came that Evangel. The Universe is not dead and demoniacal, a charnel-house with spectres; but godlike, and my Father’s!
‘Fore-shadows, or maybe fore-splendours, of that Truth, the Beginning of Truths, fell mysteriously over my soul. Sweeter than the sunrise for those shipwrecked in Nova Zembla; ah, like a mother’s voice to her little child who is lost, crying amidst unknown chaos; like gentle waves of heavenly music to my overly troubled heart, came that message. The Universe is not lifeless and sinister, a graveyard full of ghosts; but divine, and my Father’s!
‘With other eyes, too, could I now look upon my fellow man; with an infinite Love, an infinite Pity. Poor, wandering, wayward man! Art thou not tired, and beaten with stripes, even as I am? Ever, whether thou bear the royal mantle or the beggar’s gabardine, art thou not so weary, so heavy-laden; and thy Bed of Rest is but a Grave. O my Brother, my Brother, why cannot I shelter thee in my bosom, and wipe away all tears from thy eyes! Truly, the din of many-voiced Life, which, in this solitude, with the mind’s organ, I could hear, was no longer a maddening discord, but a melting one; like inarticulate cries, and sobbings of 143a dumb creature, which in the ear of Heaven are prayers. The poor Earth, with her poor joys, was now my needy Mother, not my cruel Stepdame; Man, with his so mad Wants and so mean Endeavours, had become the dearer to me; and even for his sufferings and his sins, I now first named him Brother. Thus was I standing in the porch of that “Sanctuary of Sorrow;” by strange, steep ways had I too been guided thither; and ere long its sacred gates would open, and the “Divine Depth of Sorrow” lie disclosed to me.’
‘With new eyes, I can now see my fellow man with infinite Love and infinite Compassion. Poor, wandering, wayward man! Are you not tired and beaten down just like I am? Whether you wear a royal robe or a beggar's cloak, are you not weary and burdened? Your Resting Place is but a Grave. Oh my Brother, my Brother, why can't I hold you close and wipe away all your tears? Truly, the noise of many voices in Life that I could hear in this solitude, through my mind's ear, was no longer maddening chaos but a comforting melody; like the inarticulate cries and sobs of a mute creature, which in the ears of Heaven are prayers. The poor Earth, with her modest joys, was now my needy Mother, not my cruel Stepmother; Man, with his crazy Desires and petty Struggles, had become dearer to me, and even for his sufferings and sins, I now finally called him Brother. Thus, I stood at the entrance of that “Sanctuary of Sorrow”; by strange, steep paths, I too had been led there; and soon its sacred gates would open, laying bare the “Divine Depth of Sorrow” before me.’
The Professor says, he here first got eye on the Knot that had been strangling him, and straightway could unfasten it, and was free. ‘A vain interminable controversy,’ writes he, ‘touching what is at present called Origin of Evil, or some such thing, arises in every soul, since the beginning of the world; and in every soul, that would pass from idle Suffering into actual Endeavouring, must first be put an end to. The most, in our time, have to go content with a simple, incomplete enough Suppression of this controversy; to a few some Solution of it is indispensable. In every new era, too, such Solution comes-out in different terms; and ever the Solution of the last era has become obsolete, and is found unserviceable. For it is man’s nature to change his Dialect from century to century; he cannot help it though he would. The authentic Church-Catechism of our present century has not yet fallen into my hands: meanwhile, for my own private behoof, I attempt to elucidate the matter so. Man’s Unhappiness, as I construe, comes of his Greatness; it is because there is an Infinite in him, which with all his cunning he cannot quite bury under the Finite. Will the whole Finance Ministers and Upholsterers and Confectioners of modern Europe undertake, in jointstock company, to make one Shoeblack HAPPY? They cannot accomplish it, above an hour or two; for the Shoeblack also has a Soul quite other than his Stomach; and would require, if you consider it, for his permanent satisfaction and saturation, simply this allotment, no more, and no less: God’s infinite Universe altogether to himself, therein to enjoy infinitely, and fill every wish as fast as it rose. Oceans of Hochheimer, a Throat 144like that of Ophiuchus: speak not of them; to the infinite Shoeblack they are as nothing. No sooner is your ocean filled, than he grumbles that it might have been of better vintage. Try him with half of a Universe, of an Omnipotence, he sets to quarrelling with the proprietor of the other half, and declares himself the most maltreated of men.—Always there is a black spot in our sunshine: it is even as I said, the Shadow of Ourselves.
The Professor says he first noticed the knot that was choking him, and right away he could untie it and was free. "An endless pointless debate," he writes, "about what is currently called the Origin of Evil, or something like that, has existed in every soul since the beginning of time; and for every soul that wants to move from idle suffering to actual striving, this debate must first be resolved. Most people today just settle for a simple, incomplete suppression of this debate; for a few, finding a solution is essential. In every new era, such a solution appears in different terms; and the solution from the last era has always become outdated and is deemed useless. It is human nature to change our language from century to century; even if we wanted, we couldn't help it. The authentic Church-Catechism of our current century hasn’t reached me yet; meanwhile, for my own personal understanding, I attempt to clarify the issue this way. Man’s unhappiness, as I see it, stems from his greatness; it’s because there is an infinite aspect within him that he cannot completely suppress with the finite. Can all the finance ministers, upholsterers, and confectioners of modern Europe come together to make one shoeshiner Happy? They can’t accomplish that for more than an hour or two, because the shoeshiner also has a soul that is different from his stomach; if you really think about it, for his lasting satisfaction, he simply requires this: God’s infinite universe entirely for himself, to enjoy infinitely and fulfill every desire as soon as it arises. Oceans of Hochheimer, a throat like Ophiuchus: don’t even mention them; to the infinite shoeshiner, they mean nothing. No sooner is your ocean full than he complains that it could have come from a better vintage. Even if you give him half of a universe, of an omnipotence, he will start arguing with the owner of the other half and declare himself the most wronged man alive. — There is always a dark spot in our sunshine: as I said, it’s the Shadow of Ourselves.
‘But the whim we have of Happiness is somewhat thus. By certain valuations, and averages, of our own striking, we come upon some sort of average terrestrial lot; this we fancy belongs to us by nature, and of indefeasible right. It is simple payment of our wages, of our deserts; requires neither thanks nor complaint; only such overplus as there may be do we account Happiness; any deficit again is Misery. Now consider that we have the valuation of our own deserts ourselves, and what a fund of Self-conceit there is in each of us,—do you wonder that the balance should so often dip the wrong way, and many a Blockhead cry: See there, what a payment; was ever worthy gentleman so used!—I tell thee, Blockhead, it all comes of thy Vanity; of what thou fanciest those same deserts of thine to be. Fancy that thou deservest to be hanged (as is most likely), thou wilt feel it happiness to be only shot: fancy that thou deservest to be hanged in a hair-halter, it will be a luxury to die in hemp.
‘But our idea of Happiness is somewhat like this. Based on certain assessments and averages of our own achievements, we arrive at some kind of average life situation; we believe this naturally belongs to us by right. It’s simply the payment we deserve for our efforts; it requires neither gratitude nor complaint; we only consider anything extra as Happiness; any shortfall is Misery. Now, think about how we evaluate our own worth, and how much self-importance is in each of us—do you wonder that the scale often tilts the wrong way, and many a fool exclaims: Look at that, what a payout; has any worthy person been treated so poorly!—I tell you, fool, it all comes from your Vanity; from what you think your worth actually is. If you think you deserve to be hanged (which is very likely), you will find it makes you happy to merely be shot. If you think you deserve to be hanged by a hair's breadth, dying by a noose will feel like a luxury.
‘So true is it, what I then say, that the Fraction of Life can be increased in value not so much by increasing your Numerator as by lessening your Denominator. Nay, unless my Algebra deceive me, Unity itself divided by Zero will give Infinity. Make thy claim of wages a zero, then; thou hast the world under thy feet. Well did the Wisest of our time write: “It is only with Renunciation (Entsagen) that Life, properly speaking, can be said to begin.”
‘It's so true, what I’m saying now, that the Fraction of Life can be increased in value not so much by increasing your Numerator as by decreasing your Denominator. In fact, unless my math is wrong, Unity divided by Zero results in Infinity. So make your claim to wages zero; you'll have the world at your feet. The Wisest of our time wrote well: “It is only with Renunciation (Entsagen) that Life, properly speaking, can be said to begin.”
‘I asked myself: What is this that, ever since earliest years, thou hast been fretting and fuming, and lamenting and self-tormenting, on account of? Say it in a word: is it not because thou art not HAPPY? Because the Thou (sweet gentleman) is not sufficiently 145honoured, nourished, soft-bedded, and lovingly cared for? Foolish soul! What Act of Legislature was there that thou shouldst be Happy? A little while ago thou hadst no right to be at all. What if thou wert born and predestined not to be Happy, but to be Unhappy! Art thou nothing other than a Vulture, then, that fliest through the Universe seeking after somewhat to eat; and shrieking dolefully because carrion enough is not given thee? Close thy Byron; open thy Goethe.’
‘I asked myself: What is it that, ever since my earliest years, you've been worrying and complaining about? Just say it: isn’t it because you’re not Happy? Because the You (sweet person) isn't being respected, supported, comfortably settled, and cared for enough? Silly soul! What law states that you should be Happy? Not long ago, you had no right to be at all. What if you were born and destined not to be Happy, but to be Unhappy! Are you nothing but a Vulture, then, that flies through the Universe searching for something to eat; and crying out sadly because you aren’t given enough carrion? Close your Byron; open your Goethe.‘
‘Es leuchtet mir ein, I see a glimpse of it!’ cries he elsewhere: ‘there is in man a Higher than Love of Happiness: he can do without Happiness, and instead thereof find Blessedness! Was it not to preach-forth this same Higher that sages and martyrs, the Poet and the Priest, in all times, have spoken and suffered; bearing testimony, through life and through death, of the Godlike that is in Man, and how in the Godlike only has he Strength and Freedom? Which God-inspired Doctrine art thou also honoured to be taught; O Heavens! and broken with manifold merciful Afflictions, even till thou become contrite, and learn it! O, thank thy Destiny for these; thankfully bear what yet remain: thou hadst need of them; the Self in thee needed to be annihilated. By benignant fever-paroxysms is Life rooting out the deep-seated chronic Disease, and triumphs over Death. On the roaring billows of Time, thou art not engulfed, but borne aloft into the azure of Eternity. Love not Pleasure; love God. This is the Everlasting Yea, wherein all contradiction is solved: wherein whoso walks and works, it is well with him.’
‘I get it now, I see a glimpse of it!’ he cries elsewhere: ‘There is in humanity a Higher than the Love of Happiness; people can live without Happiness and instead find Blessedness! Wasn’t it to spread this same Higher message that wise individuals and martyrs, the Poet and the Priest, have spoken and suffered throughout history, bearing witness, through their lives and deaths, to the Godlike that exists in Humanity, and how only in the Godlike does one find Strength and Freedom? This God-inspired Teaching you are also honored to learn; O Heavens! and you are tested with many merciful Afflictions until you become humble and understand it! O, be grateful to your Fate for these; bear with gratitude what still remains: you needed them; your Self needed to be broken down. Through gentle feverish struggles, Life is removing the deep-rooted chronic Illness, and triumphs over Death. On the roaring waves of Time, you are not swallowed up, but lifted up into the sky of Eternity. Don’t love Pleasure; love God. This is the Eternal Yes, in which all contradictions are resolved: in which whoever walks and works, it will go well with them.’
And again: ‘Small is it that thou canst trample the Earth with its injuries under thy feet, as old Greek Zeno trained thee: thou canst love the Earth while it injures thee, and even because it injures thee; for this a Greater than Zeno was needed, and he too was sent. Knowest thou that “Worship of Sorrow”? The Temple thereof, founded some eighteen centuries ago, now lies in ruins, overgrown with jungle, the habitation of doleful creatures: nevertheless, venture forward; in a low crypt, arched out of falling fragments, thou findest the Altar still there, and its sacred Lamp perennially burning.’
And again: ‘It’s a small thing that you can walk on the Earth with its wounds beneath your feet, as the old Greek Zeno taught you: you can love the Earth even when it hurts you, and even because it hurts you; for this, a Greater than Zeno was needed, and he was also sent. Do you know about “Worship of Sorrow”? The Temple for it, built around eighteen centuries ago, now lies in ruins, taken over by the jungle, home to sorrowful creatures: still, go ahead; in a low crypt, made from crumbling stones, you’ll find the Altar still there, and its sacred Lamp eternally burning.’
146Without pretending to comment on which strange utterances, the Editor will only remark, that there lies beside them much of a still more questionable character; unsuited to the general apprehension; nay wherein he himself does not see his way. Nebulous disquisitions on Religion, yet not without bursts of splendour; on the ‘perennial continuance of Inspiration;’ on Prophecy; that there are ‘true Priests, as well as Baal-Priests, in our own day:’ with more of the like sort. We select some fractions, by way of finish to this farrago.
146Without trying to comment on the strange remarks, the Editor will simply point out that there are many other questionable statements that are even more difficult to understand; indeed, he himself struggles to make sense of them. Vague discussions about Religion, but not without moments of brilliance; on the ‘everlasting presence of Inspiration;’ on Prophecy; that there are ‘true Priests, as well as Baal-Priests, in our own time:’ along with other similar points. We’ll take some excerpts as a conclusion to this mix.
‘Cease, my much-respected Herr von Voltaire,’ thus apostrophises the Professor: ‘shut thy sweet voice; for the task appointed thee seems finished. Sufficiently hast thou demonstrated this proposition, considerable or otherwise: That the Mythus of the Christian Religion looks not in the eighteenth century as it did in the eighth. Alas, were thy six-and-thirty quartos, and the six-and-thirty thousand other quartos and folios, and flying sheets or reams, printed before and since on the same subject, all needed to convince us of so little! But what next? Wilt thou help us to embody the divine Spirit of that Religion in a new Mythus, in a new vehicle and vesture, that our Souls, otherwise too like perishing, may live? What! thou hast no faculty in that kind? Only a torch for burning, no hammer for building? Take our thanks, then, and—thyself away.
‘Stop, my much-respected Herr von Voltaire,’ the Professor urges, ‘hush your lovely voice; for the task set before you seems complete. You’ve sufficiently demonstrated this point, whether significant or not: That the myth of the Christian religion doesn’t look the same in the eighteenth century as it did in the eighth. Alas, did we really need your thirty-six volumes, and the thirty-six thousand other volumes and sheets printed before and since on the same topic, to convince us of so little! But what now? Will you help us give the divine spirit of that religion a new myth, a new form and expression, so that our souls, otherwise too much like dying, may live? What! You have no skill in that area? Just a torch for burning, not a hammer for building? Take our thanks, then, and—please leave.’
‘Meanwhile what are antiquated Mythuses to me? Or is the God present, felt in my own heart, a thing which Herr von Voltaire will dispute out of me; or dispute into me? To the “Worship of Sorrow” ascribe what origin and genesis thou pleasest, has not that Worship originated, and been generated; is it not here? Feel it in thy heart, and then say whether it is of God! This is Belief; all else is Opinion,—for which latter whoso will let him worry and be worried.’
‘Meanwhile, what do old myths mean to me? Or is the God I feel in my own heart something that Herr von Voltaire can argue away from me; or argue into me? Ascribe whatever origin and genesis you please to the “Worship of Sorrow,” but hasn’t that Worship originated, and been generated; is it not here? Feel it in your heart, and then decide if it is from God! This is Belief; everything else is Opinion,— for which whoever wants can worry and be worried.’
‘Neither,’ observes he elsewhere, ‘shall ye tear-out one another’s eyes, struggling over “Plenary Inspiration,” and suchlike: try rather to get a little even Partial Inspiration, each of you for himself. One Bible I know, of whose Plenary Inspiration doubt is not 147so much as possible; nay with my own eyes I saw the God’s-Hand writing it: thereof all other Bibles are but leaves,—say, in Picture-Writing to assist the weaker faculty.’
‘Neither,’ he notes elsewhere, ‘should you tear each other’s eyes out, fighting over “Plenary Inspiration” and similar issues: instead, try to attain at least a little Partial Inspiration, each one for themselves. There is one Scripture I know of, about whose Plenary Inspiration there’s hardly any doubt; in fact, I saw with my own eyes the Hand of God writing it: all other Bibles are merely leaves—let's say, in Picture-Writing to help those with weaker abilities.’ 147
Or, to give the wearied reader relief, and bring it to an end, let him take the following perhaps more intelligible passage:
Or, to give the tired reader a break and wrap this up, let him read the following passage, which may be clearer:
‘To me, in this our life,’ says the Professor, ‘which is an internecine warfare with the Time-spirit, other warfare seems questionable. Hast thou in any way a Contention with thy brother, I advise thee, think well what the meaning thereof is. If thou gauge it to the bottom, it is simply this: “Fellow, see! thou art taking more than thy share of Happiness in the world, something from my share: which, by the Heavens, thou shall not; nay I will fight thee rather.”—Alas, and the whole lot to be divided is such a beggarly matter, truly a “feast of shells,” for the substance has been spilled out: not enough to quench one Appetite; and the collective human species clutching at them!—Can we not, in all such cases, rather say: “Take it, thou too-ravenous individual; take that pitiful additional fraction of a share, which I reckoned mine, but which thou so wantest; take it with a blessing: would to Heaven I had enough for thee!”—If Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre be, “to a certain extent, Applied Christianity,” surely to a still greater extent, so is this. We have here not a Whole Duty of Man, yet a Half Duty, namely the Passive half: could we but do it, as we can demonstrate it!
‘To me, in this life,’ says the Professor, ‘which is a constant struggle against the spirit of the times, any other fighting seems questionable. If you have a conflict with your brother in any way, I advise you to think carefully about what it really means. If you dig deep enough, it boils down to this: “Hey, you're taking more than your fair share of happiness in the world, something from my share: and by God, you won’t do that; I would rather fight you.” — Alas, and the total amount we have to share is so meager, truly a “feast of shells,” as the real substance has been spilled out: not enough to satisfy even one appetite; and the whole of humanity is scrambling for them! — Can we not, in all such cases, just say: “Go ahead, you overly greedy individual; take that pitiful little extra piece of what I thought was mine, but which you desire so much; take it with a blessing: I wish I had enough for you!” — If Fichte’s Wissenschaftslehre is, “to a certain extent, Applied Christianity,” then surely to an even greater extent, this is as well. Here we have not a Complete Duty of Man, but a Partial Duty, namely the Passive half: if only we could do it, as we can demonstrate it!’
‘But indeed Conviction, were it never so excellent, is worthless till it convert itself into Conduct. Nay properly Conviction is not possible till then; inasmuch as all Speculation is by nature endless, formless, a vortex amid vortices: only by a felt indubitable certainty of Experience does it find any centre to revolve round, and so fashion itself into a system. Most true is it, as a wise man teaches us, that “Doubt of any sort cannot be removed except by Action.” On which ground, too, let him who gropes painfully in darkness or uncertain light, and prays vehemently that the dawn may ripen into day, lay this other precept well to heart, which to 148me was of invaluable service: “Do the Duty which lies nearest thee,” which thou knowest to be a Duty! Thy second Duty will already have become clearer.
‘But honestly, Conviction, no matter how great it is, means nothing until it turns into Action. In fact, true Conviction can't really exist until then; all ideas are endless and chaotic by nature, like a vortex inside other vortices: it only finds a solid center to revolve around through a clear and undeniable certainty of Experience, shaping itself into a coherent system. It's absolutely true, as a wise person tells us, that “Doubt of any kind can only be resolved through Action.” Therefore, let anyone who is struggling in darkness or uncertain light, and fervently wishes for the dawn to break into day, take this valuable lesson to heart, which has been incredibly helpful to me: “Do the Duty which lies nearest to you,” which you know to be a Duty! Your next Duty will already become clearer.
‘May we not say, however, that the hour of Spiritual Enfranchisement is even this: When your Ideal World, wherein the whole man has been dimly struggling and inexpressibly languishing to work, becomes revealed, and thrown open; and you discover, with amazement enough, like the Lothario in Wilhelm Meister, that your “America is here or nowhere”? The Situation that has not its Duty, its Ideal, was never yet occupied by man. Yes here, in this poor, miserable, hampered, despicable Actual, wherein thou even now standest, here or nowhere is thy Ideal: work it out therefrom; and working, believe, live, be free. Fool! the Ideal is in thyself, the impediment too is in thyself: thy Condition is but the stuff thou art to shape that same Ideal out of: what matters whether such stuff be of this sort or that, so the Form thou give it be heroic, be poetic? O thou that pinest in the imprisonment of the Actual, and criest bitterly to the gods for a kingdom wherein to rule and create, know this of a truth: the thing thou seekest is already with thee, “here or nowhere,” couldst thou only see!
‘Can we not say that the moment of Spiritual Freedom is this: When your Ideal World, where the whole person has been quietly struggling and inexpressibly yearning to create, is revealed and opened up; and you find, with enough surprise, like Lothario in Wilhelm Meister, that your “America is here or nowhere”? The situation that lacks its Duty, its Ideal, has never truly been occupied by anyone. Yes, right here, in this poor, miserable, constrained, miserable reality, where you now stand, here or nowhere is your Ideal: work it out from there; and as you work, believe, live, be free. Fool! The Ideal is within you, and so is the limitation: your Condition is just the material you are meant to shape that Ideal from: it doesn’t matter if that material is this kind or that, as long as the form you give it is heroic, is poetic? O you who are suffering in the confinement of the Actual, and cry bitterly to the gods for a kingdom to rule and create, know this truth: what you seek is already with you, “here or nowhere,” if only you could see!
‘But it is with man’s Soul as it was with Nature: the beginning of Creation is—Light. Till the eye have vision, the whole members are in bonds. Divine moment, when over the tempest-tost Soul, as once over the wild-weltering Chaos, it is spoken: Let there be Light! Ever to the greatest that has felt such moment, is it not miraculous and God-announcing; even as, under simpler figures, to the simplest and least. The mad primeval Discord is hushed; the rudely-jumbled conflicting elements bind themselves into separate Firmaments: deep silent rock-foundations are built beneath; and the skyey vault with its everlasting Luminaries above: instead of a dark wasteful Chaos, we have a blooming, fertile, heaven-encompassed World.
‘But it’s the same with man’s soul as it is with nature: the start of creation is—light. Until the eye can see, all parts are trapped. It’s a divine moment when, over the storm-tossed soul, just as over the wild, chaotic void, it’s declared: Let there be light! For anyone who has experienced such a moment, isn’t it both miraculous and divine? Even to the simplest and least among us, it resonates. The chaotic discord of primitive times is calmed; the clashing elements arrange themselves into distinct realms: solid foundations are constructed below, and the vast sky with its everlasting stars shines above; instead of a dark, useless chaos, we have a blooming, fertile world surrounded by heaven.
‘I too could now say to myself: Be no longer a Chaos, but a World, or even Worldkin. Produce! Produce! Were it but the pitifullest infinitesimal fraction of a Product, produce it, in God’s name! ‘Tis 149the utmost thou hast in thee: out with it, then. Up, up! Whatsoever thy hand findeth to do, do it with thy whole might. Work while it is called Today; for the Night cometh, wherein no man can work.’
‘I can now say to myself: Stop being a Chaos and become a World, or even Worldkin. Create! Create! Even if it’s just the tiniest, most insignificant part of a Creation, do it, for God’s sake! This is the most you have within you: so let it out. Rise up! Whatever your hands find to do, do it with all your might. Work while it’s called Today; because the Night is coming, when no one can work.’
CHAPTER X
CHAPTER X
PAUSE
Thus have we, as closely and perhaps satisfactorily as, in such circumstances, might be, followed Teufelsdröckh through the various successive states and stages of Growth, Entanglement, Unbelief, and almost Reprobation, into a certain clearer state of what he himself seems to consider as Conversion. ‘Blame not the word,’ says he; ‘rejoice rather that such a word, signifying such a thing, has come to light in our modern Era, though hidden from the wisest Ancients. The Old World knew nothing of Conversion; instead of an Ecce Homo, they had only some Choice of Hercules. It was a new-attained progress in the Moral Development of man: hereby has the Highest come home to the bosoms of the most Limited; what to Plato was but a hallucination, and to Socrates a chimera, is now clear and certain to your Zinzendorfs, your Wesleys, and the poorest of their Pietists and Methodists.’
So we have closely and perhaps satisfactorily followed Teufelsdröckh through the various stages of Growth, Entanglement, Unbelief, and almost Reprobation, into a clearer state of what he seems to view as Conversion. ‘Don’t blame the word,’ he says; ‘instead, be glad that such a word, representing such a concept, has emerged in our modern Era, even though it was hidden from the wisest Ancients. The Old World knew nothing of Conversion; instead of an Ecce Homo, they only had some Choice of Hercules. It represents a new advancement in the Moral Development of humanity: here, the Highest has come home to the hearts of the most Limited; what was merely a hallucination to Plato, and a chimera to Socrates, is now clear and certain to your Zinzendorfs, your Wesleys, and even the humblest of their Pietists and Methodists.’
It is here, then, that the spiritual majority of Teufelsdröckh commences: we are henceforth to see him ‘work in well-doing,’ with the spirit and clear aims of a Man. He has discovered that the Ideal Workshop he so panted for is even this same Actual ill-furnished Workshop he has so long been stumbling in. He can say to himself: ‘Tools? Thou hast no Tools? Why, there is not a Man, or a Thing, now alive but has tools. The basest of created animalcules, the Spider itself, has a spinning-jenny, and warping-mill, and power-loom within its head: the stupidest of Oysters has a Papin’s-Digester, with stone-and-lime house to hold it in: every being that can live can do something: this let him do.—Tools? Hast thou not a Brain, furnished, furnishable 150with some glimmerings of Light; and three fingers to hold a Pen withal? Never since Aaron’s Rod went out of practice, or even before it, was there such a wonder-working Tool: greater than all recorded miracles have been performed by Pens. For strangely in this so solid-seeming World, which nevertheless is in continual restless flux, it is appointed that Sound, to appearance the most fleeting, should be the most continuing of all things. The Word is well said to be omnipotent in this world; man, thereby divine, can create as by a Fiat. Awake, arise! Speak forth what is in thee; what God has given thee, what the Devil shall not take away. Higher task than that of Priesthood was allotted to no man: wert thou but the meanest in that sacred Hierarchy, is it not honour enough therein to spend and be spent?
It is here, then, that the spiritual journey of Teufelsdröckh begins: from now on, we will see him ‘work in well-doing,’ with the spirit and clear goals of a Man. He has realized that the Ideal Workshop he longed for is actually this very real, poorly equipped Workshop he has been stumbling through. He can remind himself: ‘Tools? You have no tools? Well, there isn’t a single person or thing alive that doesn’t have tools. Even the most basic creature, the Spider, has a spinning wheel, a weaving setup, and a power loom in its mind: the simplest Oyster has a pressure cooker, with a stone-and-lime house to keep it in: every being that can live can do something: let it do.—Tools? Don’t you have a Brain, equipped, ready to be equipped with some glimmers of Light; and three fingers to hold a Pen? Never since Aaron’s Rod fell out of use, or even before it, has there been such a miraculous Tool: greater than all recorded miracles have been performed by Pens. For strangely in this seemingly solid World, which is really in constant, restless change, it is destined that Sound, apparently the most fleeting, should be the most lasting of all things. The Word is rightly said to be omnipotent in this world; man, by this divine gift, can create as by a Fiat. Wake up, rise! Speak forth what is within you; what God has given you, what the Devil cannot take away. No higher task than that of Priesthood has been assigned to any man: even if you were the lowest in that sacred Hierarchy, isn’t it honor enough to spend and be spent in it?
‘By this Art, which whoso will may sacrilegiously degrade into a handicraft,’ adds Teufelsdröckh, ‘have I thenceforth abidden. Writings of mine, not indeed known as mine (for what am I?), have fallen, perhaps not altogether void, into the mighty seed-field of Opinion; fruits of my unseen sowing gratifyingly meet me here and there. I thank the Heavens that I have now found my Calling; wherein, with or without perceptible result, I am minded diligently to persevere.
‘Through this art, which anyone can disgracefully reduce to a trade,’ adds Teufelsdröckh, ‘I have since then chosen to remain. Writings of mine, not exactly recognized as mine (for who am I?), have perhaps not entirely vanished into the vast field of Opinion; the fruits of my unseen efforts occasionally greet me here and there. I’m grateful to the heavens that I have finally discovered my true calling; in which, with or without noticeable results, I intend to keep working diligently.’
‘Nay how knowest thou,’ cries he, ‘but this and the other pregnant Device, now grown to be a world-renowned far-working Institution; like a grain of right mustard-seed once cast into the right soil, and now stretching-out strong boughs to the four winds, for the birds of the air to lodge in,—may have been properly my doing? Some one’s doing, it without doubt was; from some Idea, in some single Head, it did first of all take beginning: why not from some Idea in mine?’ Does Teufelsdröckh here glance at that ‘Society for the Conservation of Property (Eigenthums-conservirende Gesellschaft),’ of which so many ambiguous notices glide spectre-like through these inexpressible Paper-bags? ‘An Institution,’ hints he, ‘not unsuitable to the wants of the time; as indeed such sudden extension proves: for already can the Society number, among its office-bearers or corresponding members, the 151highest Names, if not the highest Persons, in Germany, England, France; and contributions, both of money and of meditation, pour-in from all quarters; to, if possible, enlist the remaining Integrity of the world, and, defensively and with forethought, marshal it round this Palladium.’ Does Teufelsdröckh mean, then, to give himself out as the originator of that so notable Eigenthums-conservirende (‘Owndom-conserving’) Gesellschaft; and if so, what, in the Devil’s name, is it? He again hints: ‘At a time when the divine Commandment, Thou shalt not steal, wherein truly, if well understood, is comprised the whole Hebrew Decalogue, with Solon’s and Lycurgus’s Constitutions, Justinian’s Pandects, the Code Napoléon, and all Codes, Catechisms, Divinities, Moralities whatsoever, that man has hitherto devised (and enforced with Altar-fire and Gallows-ropes) for his social guidance: at a time, I say, when this divine Commandment has all-but faded away from the general remembrance; and, with little disguise, a new opposite Commandment, Thou shalt steal, is everywhere promulgated,—it perhaps behooved, in this universal dotage and deliration, the sound portion of mankind to bestir themselves and rally. When the widest and wildest violations of that divine right of Property, the only divine right now extant or conceivable, are sanctioned and recommended by a vicious Press, and the world has lived to hear it asserted that we have no Property in our very Bodies, but only an accidental Possession and Life-rent, what is the issue to be looked for? Hangmen and Catchpoles may, by their noose-gins and baited fall-traps, keep-down the smaller sort of vermin; but what, except perhaps some such Universal Association, can protect us against whole meat-devouring and man-devouring hosts of Boa-constrictors? If, therefore, the more sequestered Thinker have wondered, in his privacy, from what hand that perhaps not ill-written Program in the Public Journals, with its high Prize-Questions and so liberal Prizes, could have proceeded,—let him now cease such wonder; and, with undivided faculty, betake himself to the Concurrenz (Competition).’
‘But how do you know,’ he exclaims, ‘that this and the other important idea, which has now become a world-famous institution, like a tiny mustard seed once sown in the right soil, now reaching out its strong branches to the four winds for the birds of the air to nest in, wasn't actually my doing? It was definitely someone’s doing; it surely started from some idea in a single mind: why not from an idea in mine?’ Does Teufelsdröckh here refer to that ‘Society for the Conservation of Property (Eigenthums-conservirende Gesellschaft),’ of which so many vague notices drift ghost-like through these unspeakable paper bags? ‘An institution,’ he suggests, ‘that suits the current needs; as indeed such rapid growth indicates: for already the Society counts among its leaders or members some of the 151most prominent names, if not the most important people, in Germany, England, and France; and contributions, both financial and intellectual, are coming in from everywhere, aimed at possibly rallying the remaining integrity of the world and, protectively and thoughtfully, organizing it around this sacred cause.’ Is Teufelsdröckh then claiming to be the creator of that notable Eigenthums-conservirende (‘Property-conserving’) Gesellschaft; and if so, what in the world is it? He hints again: ‘At a time when the divine Commandment, Thou shalt not steal, which, if truly understood, encompasses the whole Hebrew Decalogue, along with Solon’s and Lycurgus’s constitutions, Justinian’s Pandects, the Code Napoléon, and all codes, catechisms, deities, and moralities that humanity has ever created (and enforced with altar fire and gallows ropes) for social guidance: at a time, I say, when this divine Commandment has almost disappeared from common memory; and, with little disguise, a new opposite Commandment, Thou shalt steal, is being spread everywhere,—it may well be necessary, in this universal madness and confusion, for the sensible portion of humanity to stir and unite. When the most extensive and extreme violations of that divine right of property, the only divine right currently existing or conceivable, are sanctioned and promoted by a corrupt press, and the world has come to hear it claimed that we have no property in our very bodies, but only an accidental possession and life-rent, what outcome can be expected? Hangmen and catchpoles may, with their noose traps and baited fall traps, keep down the smaller pests; but what, except perhaps some kind of Universal Association, can protect us against entire packs of flesh-eating and human-eating boa constrictors? If, therefore, the more isolated thinker has wondered, in his solitude, where that perhaps not poorly written Program in the public journals, with its lofty Prize Questions and generous Prizes, could have originated—let him now stop such wonder; and, with focused attention, engage in the Concurrenz (Competition).’
We ask: Has this same ‘perhaps not ill-written 152Program,’ or any other authentic Transaction of that Property-conserving Society, fallen under the eye of the British Reader, in any Journal foreign or domestic? If so, what are those Prize-Questions; what are the terms of Competition, and when and where? No printed Newspaper-leaf, no farther light of any sort, to be met with in these Paper-bags! Or is the whole business one other of those whimsicalities and perverse inexplicabilities, whereby Herr Teufelsdröckh, meaning much or nothing, is pleased so often to play fast-and-loose with us?
We ask: Has this same "perhaps not poorly written 152Program," or any other genuine document from that Property-conserving Society, come to the attention of the British Reader, in any journal, domestic or foreign? If so, what are those Prize-Questions; what are the competition terms, and when and where? There’s no printed newspaper page, no further information of any kind, to be found in these Paper bags! Or is this whole thing just another one of those quirks and confusing mysteries, where Herr Teufelsdröckh, meaning a lot or nothing, enjoys playing tricks on us?
Here, indeed, at length, must the Editor give utterance to a painful suspicion, which, through late Chapters, has begun to haunt him; paralysing any little enthusiasm that might still have rendered his thorny Biographical task a labour of love. It is a suspicion grounded perhaps on trifles, yet confirmed almost into certainty by the more and more discernible humoristico-satirical tendency of Teufelsdröckh, in whom underground humours and intricate sardonic rogueries, wheel within wheel, defy all reckoning: a suspicion, in one word, that these Autobiographical Documents are partly a mystification! What if many a so-called Fact were little better than a Fiction; if here we had no direct Camera-obscura Picture of the Professor’s History; but only some more or less fantastic Adumbration, symbolically, perhaps significantly enough, shadowing-forth the same! Our theory begins to be that, in receiving as literally authentic what was but hieroglyphically so, Hofrath Heuschrecke, whom in that case we scruple not to name Hofrath Nose-of-Wax, was made a fool of, and set adrift to make fools of others. Could it be expected, indeed, that a man so known for impenetrable reticence as Teufelsdröckh, would all at once frankly unlock his private citadel to an English Editor and a German Hofrath; and not rather deceptively inlock both Editor and Hofrath in the labyrinthic tortuosities and covered-ways of said citadel (having enticed them thither), to see, in his half-devilish way, how the fools would look?
Here, at long last, the Editor must express a troubling suspicion that has been creeping up on him through the recent chapters, dampening any enthusiasm that might have kept his challenging biographical task enjoyable. This suspicion, maybe based on minor details, has become almost certain due to the increasingly evident humorous and satirical tendencies of Teufelsdröckh, who seems to have underground themes and complex mockeries, intertwined in a way that defies understanding: in short, a suspicion that these Autobiographical Documents might be partly a ruse! What if many so-called facts are little more than fabrications; if we don’t have an accurate Camera-obscura image of the Professor’s history, but only a more or less fantastic representation that symbolically and perhaps significantly reflects it? Our emerging theory suggests that by taking what was only superficially authentic as genuinely so, Hofrath Heuschrecke, who in this case we aren’t afraid to call Hofrath Nose-of-Wax, was made a fool and cast adrift to fool others. Could we really expect a man as known for his impenetrable silence as Teufelsdröckh to suddenly open up his private fortress to an English Editor and a German Hofrath? Wouldn’t he rather trick both the Editor and Hofrath into the intricate twists and hidden paths of that fortress (having lured them there), just to see, in his mischievous way, how foolish they would look?
Of one fool, however, the Herr Professor will perhaps 153find himself short. On a small slip, formerly thrown aside as blank, the ink being all-but invisible, we lately notice, and with effort decipher, the following: ‘What are your historical Facts; still more your biographical? Wilt thou know a Man, above all a Mankind, by stringing-together beadrolls of what thou namest Facts? The Man is the spirit he worked in; not what he did, but what he became. Facts are engraved Hierograms, for which the fewest have the key. And then how your Blockhead (Dummkopf) studies not their Meaning; but simply whether they are well or ill cut, what he calls Moral or Immoral! Still worse is it with your Bungler (Pfuscher): such I have seen reading some Rousseau, with pretences of interpretation; and mistaking the ill-cut Serpent-of-Eternity for a common poisonous reptile.’ Was the Professor apprehensive lest an Editor, selected as the present boasts himself, might mistake the Teufelsdröckh Serpent-of-Eternity in like manner? For which reason it was to be altered, not without underhand satire, into a plainer Symbol? Or is this merely one of his half-sophisms, half-truisms, which if he can but set on the back of a Figure, he cares not whither it gallop? We say not with certainty; and indeed, so strange is the Professor, can never say. If our suspicion be wholly unfounded, let his own questionable ways, not our necessary circumspectness, bear the blame.
Of one fool, however, the Professor might find himself at a loss. On a small slip of paper, which was previously discarded as blank because the ink was nearly invisible, we recently spotted and managed to decipher the following: 'What are your historical facts, and even more, your biographical ones? Can you know a person, especially humanity as a whole, by just stringing together a list of what you call facts? A person is defined by the spirit in which they acted; not by what they did, but by what they became. Facts are engraved symbols, for which only a few have the key. And then how your blockhead (Dummkopf) doesn’t study their meaning, but only whether they are well or poorly presented, what he calls moral or immoral! Even worse is your bungler (Pfuscher): I have seen such a person reading some Rousseau, pretending to interpret it, mistaking the poorly presented Serpent-of-Eternity for a regular poisonous snake.' Was the Professor worried that an Editor, chosen to boast of himself as the current one does, might mistakenly interpret the Teufelsdröckh Serpent-of-Eternity in the same way? Is that why it was to be changed, not without subtle satire, into a simpler symbol? Or is this just one of his half-truths or half-sophisms, which if he can only attach to a figure, he doesn't care where it goes? We can't say for sure; and honestly, the Professor is so strange that we can never know. If our suspicion is completely unfounded, let his own questionable ways take the blame, not our necessary caution.
But be this as it will, the somewhat exasperated and indeed exhausted Editor determines here to shut these Paper-bags for the present. Let it suffice that we know of Teufelsdröckh, so far, if ‘not what he did, yet what he became:’ the rather, as his character has now taken its ultimate bent, and no new revolution, of importance, is to be looked for. The imprisoned Chrysalis is now a winged Psyche: and such, wheresoever be its flight, it will continue. To trace by what complex gyrations (flights or involuntary waftings) through the mere external Life element, Teufelsdröckh reaches his University Professorship, and the Psyche clothes herself in civic Titles, without altering her now fixed nature,—would be comparatively an unproductive task, were we even unsuspicious of its being, for us at least, a false 154and impossible one. His outward Biography, therefore, which, at the Blumine Lover’s-Leap, we saw churned utterly into spray-vapour, may hover in that condition, for aught that concerns us here. Enough that by survey of certain ‘pools and plashes,’ we have ascertained its general direction; do we not already know that, by one way and other, it has long since rained-down again into a stream; and even now, at Weissnichtwo, flows deep and still, fraught with the Philosophy of Clothes, and visible to whoso will cast eye thereon? Over much invaluable matter, that lies scattered, like jewels among quarry-rubbish, in those Paper-catacombs we may have occasion to glance back, and somewhat will demand insertion at the right place: meanwhile be our tiresome diggings therein suspended.
But that aside, the somewhat frustrated and indeed exhausted Editor decides to close these Paper-bags for now. Let it be enough that we know about Teufelsdröckh, so far, if 'not what he did, yet what he became:' especially since his character has now taken its final shape, and no significant changes are expected. The trapped Chrysalis is now a winged Psyche: and wherever its flight may take it, it will persist. To explore the complicated twists and turns (flights or unintentional breezes) through the mere external elements of life, by which Teufelsdröckh achieves his University Professorship, and the Psyche adorns itself with civic titles without changing its now established nature—would be a relatively fruitless endeavor, even if we weren’t suspicious of it being, at least for us, a false and impossible one. His outward Biography, therefore, which we previously saw at Blumine Lover’s-Leap spinning completely into mist, can stay in that state for all that concerns us here. It’s enough that by examining certain 'pools and plashes,' we've determined its general direction; don’t we already know that, one way or another, it has long since returned to a stream; and even now, at Weissnichtwo, flows deep and still, full of the Philosophy of Clothes, and visible to anyone who chooses to look? Over a lot of invaluable material, scattered like jewels among quarry debris, in those Paper-catacombs we may need to revisit, and some will need to be inserted at the right spots: for now, let our tedious digging be put on hold.
If now, before reopening the great Clothes-Volume, we ask what our degree of progress, during these Ten Chapters, has been, towards right understanding of the Clothes-Philosophy, let not our discouragement become total. To speak in that old figure of the Hell-gate Bridge over Chaos, a few flying pontoons have perhaps been added, though as yet they drift straggling on the Flood; how far they will reach, when once the chains are straightened and fastened, can, at present, only be matter of conjecture.
If we take a moment to assess how much progress we've made in understanding the Clothes-Philosophy during these Ten Chapters, let's not let discouragement completely take over. To use that old analogy of the Hell-gate Bridge over Chaos, a few temporary pontoons might have been added, even if they're still scattered on the water. It's uncertain how far they'll extend once the chains are taut and secured; that remains a matter of speculation for now.
So much we already calculate: Through many a little loop-hole, we have had glimpses into the internal world of Teufelsdröckh; his strange mystic, almost magic Diagram of the Universe, and how it was gradually drawn, is not henceforth altogether dark to us. Those mysterious ideas on Time, which merit consideration, and are not wholly unintelligible with such, may by and by prove significant. Still more may his somewhat peculiar view of Nature, the decisive Oneness he ascribes to Nature. How all Nature and Life are but one Garment, a ‘Living Garment,’ woven and ever a-weaving in the ‘Loom of Time;’ is not here, indeed, the outline of a whole Clothes-Philosophy; at least the arena it is to work in? Remark, too, that the Character of the Man, nowise without meaning in such a matter, becomes less enigmatic: amid so much tumultuous obscurity, almost like diluted madness, do not a certain 155indomitable Defiance and yet a boundless Reverence seem to loom-forth, as the two mountain-summits, on whose rock-strata all the rest were based and built?
So much we already calculate: Through many little loopholes, we’ve caught glimpses into Teufelsdröckh’s inner world; his strange, almost magical Diagram of the Universe is no longer completely unclear to us. Those mysterious ideas on Time, which deserve attention and aren’t entirely incomprehensible, may eventually prove significant. Even more, his somewhat unique perspective on Nature, the decisive Oneness he attributes to it, is interesting. How all of Nature and Life are just one Garment, a ‘Living Garment,’ woven and continuously weaving in the ‘Loom of Time;’ isn’t this, in fact, the outline of an entire Clothes-Philosophy? At the very least, it presents the arena for one to work in. Also note that the character of the man, which certainly carries meaning in this context, becomes less mysterious: amidst so much chaotic obscurity, almost like diluted madness, doesn’t a certain 155indomitable Defiance and yet boundless Reverence seem to emerge, like two mountain peaks upon which everything else is built?
Nay further, may we not say that Teufelsdröckh’s Biography, allowing it even, as suspected, only a hieroglyphical truth, exhibits a man, as it were preappointed for Clothes-Philosophy? To look through the Shows of things into Things themselves he is led and compelled. The ‘Passivity’ given him by birth is fostered by all turns of his fortune. Everywhere cast out, like oil out of water, from mingling in any Employment, in any public Communion, he has no portion but Solitude, and a life of Meditation. The whole energy of his existence is directed, through long years, on one task: that of enduring pain, if he cannot cure it. Thus everywhere do the Shows of things oppress him, withstand him, threaten him with fearfullest destruction: only by victoriously penetrating into Things themselves can he find peace and a stronghold. But is not this same looking through the Shows, or Vestures, into the Things, even the first preliminary to a Philosophy of Clothes? Do we not, in all this, discern some beckonings towards the true higher purport of such a Philosophy; and what shape it must assume with such a man, in such an era?
No further, can we not say that Teufelsdröckh’s Biography, even if it only hints at a symbolic truth, shows a man who seems destined for Clothes-Philosophy? He is driven and compelled to look through the appearances of things to understand the essence of things themselves. The ‘Passivity’ he was born with is encouraged by all the twists of his fate. He is cast out everywhere, like oil floating on water, unable to engage in any work or public community, leaving him with nothing but solitude and a life of contemplation. The entire focus of his existence is spent, over many years, on one task: enduring pain if he can’t find a way to alleviate it. Thus, the appearances of things press down on him, resist him, and threaten him with the most terrifying destruction: only by successfully penetrating into the essence of things can he find peace and stability. But isn't this same effort to see beyond the appearances, or coverings, into the essence of things the very first step toward a Philosophy of Clothes? Do we not see in all of this some signs pointing toward the true higher meaning of such a Philosophy, and what form it must take for a man like him in such a time?
Perhaps in entering on Book Third, the courteous Reader is not utterly without guess whither he is bound: nor, let us hope, for all the fantastic Dream-Grottoes through which, as is our lot with Teufelsdröckh, he must wander, will there be wanting between whiles some twinkling of a steady Polar Star.
Perhaps as we begin Book Third, the kind Reader has some idea of where we’re headed: and let’s hope that despite all the bizarre Dream-Grottoes through which, like Teufelsdröckh, he must journey, there will still be moments of guidance from a shining Polar Star.
BOOK THIRD
CHAPTER I
CHAPTER 1
INCIDENT IN MODERN HISTORY
As a wonder-loving and wonder-seeking man, Teufelsdröckh, from an early part of this Clothes-Volume, has more and more exhibited himself. Striking it was, amid all his perverse cloudiness, with what force of vision and of heart he pierced into the mystery of the World; recognising in the highest sensible phenomena, so far as Sense went, only fresh or faded Raiment; yet ever, under this, a celestial Essence thereby rendered visible: and while, on the one hand, he trod the old rags of Matter, with their tinsels, into the mire, he on the other everywhere exalted Spirit above all earthly principalities and powers, and worshipped it, though under the meanest shapes, with a true Platonic Mysticism. What the man ultimately purposed by thus casting his Greek-fire into the general Wardrobe of the Universe; what such, more or less complete, rending and burning of Garments throughout the whole compass of Civilized Life and Speculation, should lead to; the rather as he was no Adamite, in any sense, and could not, like Rousseau, recommend either bodily or intellectual Nudity, and a return to the savage state: all this our readers are now bent to discover; this is, in fact, properly the gist and purport of Professor Teufelsdröckh’s Philosophy of Clothes.
As a man who loves and seeks wonder, Teufelsdröckh, from the early sections of this Clothes-Volume, has increasingly showcased himself. It was striking, amid all his confusing thoughts, how powerfully he delved into the mystery of the world; recognizing that in the most significant experiences, as far as our senses can perceive, there were only fresh or worn-out clothes; yet beneath it all, he glimpsed a celestial essence made visible. While he trampled the old rags of matter, with their glitter, into the dirt, he also consistently elevated spirit above all earthly authorities and admired it, even in its humblest forms, with a genuine Platonic mysticism. What he ultimately aimed to achieve by casting his passionate insights into the universe's general wardrobe; what this more or less complete tearing and burning of garments throughout the entirety of civilized life and thought would lead to; especially since he was not a primitive man in any sense and couldn't, like Rousseau, advocate for either physical or intellectual nudity or a return to a savage state: all of this our readers are now eager to discover; this is, in fact, the main theme and purpose of Professor Teufelsdröckh’s Philosophy of Clothes.
Be it remembered, however, that such purport is here not so much evolved, as detected to lie ready for evolving. We are to guide our British Friends into the new Gold-country, and show them the mines; nowise to dig-out and exhaust its wealth, which indeed remains for all time inexhaustible. Once there, let each dig for his own behoof, and enrich himself.
Be it remembered, however, that this meaning is not so much developed as discovered, waiting to be developed. We are here to lead our British friends into the new Gold Country and show them the mines; not to extract and deplete its resources, which are actually limitless for all time. Once there, let everyone mine for their own benefit and enrich themselves.
Neither, in so capricious inexpressible a Work as this of the Professor’s can our course now more than formerly 157be straightforward, step by step, but at best leap by leap. Significant Indications stand-out here and there; which for the critical eye, that looks both widely and narrowly, shape themselves into some ground-scheme of a Whole: to select these with judgment, so that a leap from one to the other be possible, and (in our old figure) by chaining them together, a passable Bridge be effected: this, as heretofore, continues our only method. Among such light-spots, the following, floating in much wild matter about Perfectibility, has seemed worth clutching at:
Neither, in such a unpredictable and indescribable work as this one by the Professor, can our path now be straightforward, step by step, but rather, at best, leap by leap. Significant hints appear here and there; for the critical eye that observes both widely and closely, they form some foundational outline of a whole: selecting these wisely so that a leap from one to another is possible, and (using our old analogy) by linking them together, a workable bridge is created: this, as before, remains our only approach. Among such points of clarity, the following, hovering amidst a lot of chaotic ideas about Perfectibility, has seemed worth seizing:
‘Perhaps the most remarkable incident in Modern History,’ says Teufelsdröckh, ‘is not the Diet of Worms, still less the Battle of Austerlitz, Waterloo, Peterloo, or any other Battle; but an incident passed carelessly over by most Historians, and treated with some degree of ridicule by others: namely, George Fox’s making to himself a suit of Leather. This man, the first of the Quakers, and by trade a Shoemaker, was one of those, to whom, under ruder or purer form, the Divine Idea of the Universe is pleased to manifest itself; and, across all the hulls of Ignorance and earthly Degradation, shine through, in unspeakable Awfulness, unspeakable Beauty, on their souls: who therefore are rightly accounted Prophets, God-possessed; or even Gods, as in some periods it has chanced. Sitting in his stall; working on tanned hides, amid pincers, paste-horns, rosin, swine-bristles, and a nameless flood of rubbish, this youth had, nevertheless, a Living Spirit belonging to him; also an antique Inspired Volume, through which, as through a window, it could look upwards, and discern its celestial Home. The task of a daily pair of shoes, coupled even with some prospect of victuals, and an honourable Mastership in Cordwainery, and perhaps the post of Thirdborough in his hundred, as the crown of long faithful sewing,—was nowise satisfaction enough to such a mind: but ever amid the boring and hammering came tones from that far country, came Splendours and Terrors; for this poor Cordwainer, as we said, was a Man; and the Temple of Immensity, wherein as Man he had been sent to minister, was full of holy mystery to him.
‘Perhaps the most remarkable event in Modern History,’ says Teufelsdröckh, ‘is not the Diet of Worms, and not even the Battles of Austerlitz, Waterloo, Peterloo, or any other battle; but an event that most historians overlook, and which some treat with a degree of ridicule: namely, George Fox making himself a leather suit. This man, the first of the Quakers and a shoemaker by trade, was one of those to whom, in various forms, the Divine Idea of the Universe chooses to reveal itself; and, beyond all the barriers of ignorance and earthly degradation, shines through, with unspeakable awe and beauty, upon their souls: which is why they are rightly considered prophets, inspired by God; or even gods, as has occasionally been the case. Sitting in his workshop, working on tanned hides, surrounded by tools, paste, rosin, pig bristles, and a flood of miscellaneous items, this young man still possessed a living spirit; he also had an ancient inspired book, through which he could look upward and discern his heavenly home. The daily task of making shoes, along with the chance of earning some food, a respected position in shoe-making, and perhaps even a place as a local officer, as the reward for his long and faithful work—was not sufficient for such a mind: even amid the tedious boring and hammering, he heard calls from that distant land, felt splendors and terrors; for this poor shoemaker, as we mentioned, was a man; and the vast temple in which he had been sent to serve was filled with holy mystery for him.’
158‘The Clergy of the neighbourhood, the ordained Watchers and Interpreters of that same holy mystery, listened with unaffected tedium to his consultations, and advised him, as the solution of such doubts, to “drink beer and dance with the girls.” Blind leaders of the blind! For what end were their tithes levied and eaten; for what were their shovel-hats scooped-out, and their surplices and cassock-aprons girt-on; and such a church-repairing, and chaffering, and organing, and other racketing, held over that spot of God’s Earth,—if Man were but a Patent Digester, and the Belly with its adjuncts the grand Reality? Fox turned from them, with tears and a sacred scorn, back to his Leather-parings and his Bible. Mountains of encumbrance, higher than Ætna, had been heaped over that Spirit: but it was a Spirit, and would not lie buried there. Through long days and nights of silent agony, it struggled and wrestled, with a man’s force, to be free: how its prison-mountains heaved and swayed tumultuously, as the giant spirit shook them to this hand and that, and emerged into the light of Heaven! That Leicester shoe-shop, had men known it, was a holier place than any Vatican or Loretto-shrine.—“So bandaged, and hampered, and hemmed in,” groaned he, “with thousand requisitions, obligations, straps, tatters, and tagrags, I can neither see nor move: not my own am I, but the World’s; and Time flies fast, and Heaven is high, and Hell is deep: Man! bethink thee, if thou hast power of Thought! Why not; what binds me here? Want, want!—Ha, of what? Will all the shoe-wages under the Moon ferry me across into that far Land of Light? Only Meditation can, and devout Prayer to God. I will to the woods: the hollow of a tree will lodge me, wild-berries feed me; and for Clothes, cannot I stitch myself one perennial suit of Leather!”
158 "The local clergy, the ordained watchers and interpreters of that same holy mystery, listened with complete boredom to his consultations and advised him, as the answer to such doubts, to 'drink beer and dance with the girls.' Blind leaders of the blind! What was the point of collecting their tithes and consuming them; what was the reason for their ceremonial hats, their surplices, and cassocks; and all the church repairs, negotiations, and organ maintenance done on that piece of God’s Earth—if Man were just a Patent Digester, and the stomach and its parts the true reality? Fox turned away from them, with tears and a sacred scorn, back to his leather scraps and his Bible. Mountains of burdens, higher than Mount Etna, had piled up on that Spirit: but it was a Spirit and wouldn’t stay buried. Through long days and nights of silent suffering, it struggled and fought with a man’s strength to be free: how its prison-mountains heaved and swayed violently as the giant spirit shook them this way and that, emerging into the light of Heaven! That Leicester shoe shop, if men had known, was a holier place than any Vatican or Loretto shrine.—‘So bandaged, and hampered, and hemmed in,’ he groaned, ‘with a thousand requirements, obligations, straps, rags, and tatters, I can neither see nor move: I’m not my own, but the World’s; and Time flies fast, and Heaven is high, and Hell is deep: Man! think about it, if you have the power of Thought! Why not; what binds me here? Need, need!—Ha, of what? Will all the shoe wages under the Moon carry me across to that far Land of Light? Only Meditation can, and devout Prayer to God. I will go to the woods: the hollow of a tree will shelter me, wild berries will feed me; and for Clothes, can’t I just stitch myself one everlasting suit of Leather!’"
‘Historical Oil-painting,’ continues Teufelsdröckh, ‘is one of the Arts I never practised; therefore shall I not decide whether this subject were easy of execution on the canvas. Yet often has it seemed to me as if such first outflashing of man’s Freewill, to lighten, more and more into Day, the Chaotic Night that threatened to engulf him in its hindrances and its 159horrors, were properly the only grandeur there is in History. Let some living Angelo or Rosa, with seeing eye and understanding heart, picture George Fox on that morning, when he spreads-out his cutting-board for the last time, and cuts cowhides by unwonted patterns, and stitches them together into one continuous all-including Case, the farewell service of his awl! Stitch away, thou noble Fox: every prick of that little instrument is pricking into the heart of Slavery, and World-worship, and the Mammon-god. Thy elbows jerk, and in strong swimmer-strokes, and every stroke is bearing thee across the Prison-ditch, within which Vanity holds her Workhouse and Ragfair, into lands of true Liberty; were the work done, there is in broad Europe one Free Man, and thou art he!
‘Historical Oil-painting,’ continues Teufelsdröckh, ‘is one of the Arts I’ve never practiced; so I won’t decide whether this subject is easy to execute on canvas. However, it often seems to me that the initial flash of man’s Freewill, illuminating the Chaotic Night that threatened to engulf him in its obstacles and horrors, is truly the only greatness in History. Let some modern Angelo or Rosa, with a keen eye and understanding heart, depict George Fox on that morning when he lays out his cutting board for the last time and cuts cowhides in unusual patterns, stitching them together into one continuous encompassing Case, the farewell use of his awl! Stitch away, noble Fox: every prick of that little tool pushes into the heart of Slavery, World-worship, and the Mammon-god. Your elbows pull and with strong, swimmer-like strokes, each stroke carries you across the Prison-ditch, where Vanity keeps her Workhouse and Ragfair, into lands of true Freedom; if the work is done, there is one Free Man in all of Europe, and that’s you!
‘Thus from the lowest depth there is a path to the loftiest height; and for the Poor also a Gospel has been published. Surely if, as D’Alembert asserts, my illustrious namesake, Diogenes, was the greatest man of Antiquity, only that he wanted Decency, then by stronger reason is George Fox the greatest of the Moderns; and greater than Diogenes himself: for he too stands on the adamantine basis of his Manhood, casting aside all props and shoars; yet not, in half-savage Pride, undervaluing the Earth; valuing it rather, as a place to yield him warmth and food, he looks Heavenward from his Earth, and dwells in an element of Mercy and Worship, with a still Strength, such as the Cynic’s Tub did nowise witness. Great, truly, was that Tub; a temple from which man’s dignity and divinity was scornfully preached abroad: but greater is the Leather Hull, for the same sermon was preached there, and not in Scorn but in Love.’
‘So, from the lowest point, there’s a way to the highest peak; and for the Poor, a Gospel has been shared. If, as D’Alembert claims, my famous namesake, Diogenes, was the greatest man of Antiquity simply because he lacked Decency, then by stronger reasoning, George Fox is the greatest of the Moderns; and even greater than Diogenes himself: he also stands on the solid foundation of his Humanity, casting aside all supports and limitations; yet not, in half-savage Pride, looking down on the Earth; rather, he values it as a source of warmth and food, gazing Heavenward from the Earth, and existing in an atmosphere of Mercy and Worship, with a calm Strength that the Cynic’s Tub could not show. Truly, that Tub was great; a temple from which man’s dignity and divinity was scornfully preached: but greater is the Leather Hull, for the same message was shared there, not in Scorn but in Love.’
George Fox’s ‘perennial suit,’ with all that it held, has been worn quite into ashes for nigh two centuries: why, in a discussion on the Perfectibility of Society, reproduce it now? Not out of blind sectarian partisanship: Teufelsdröckh himself is no Quaker; with all his pacific tendencies, did not we see him, in that scene at the North Cape, with the Archangel Smuggler, exhibit fire-arms?
George Fox’s ‘perennial suit,’ with everything it represented, has pretty much turned to ashes for nearly two centuries: so why bring it up now in a discussion about the Perfectibility of Society? It’s not out of blind loyalty to a sect: Teufelsdröckh himself isn’t a Quaker; despite his peaceful tendencies, didn’t we see him, in that scene at the North Cape, with the Archangel Smuggler, showing off firearms?
160For us, aware of his deep Sansculottism, there is more meant in this passage than meets the ear. At the same time, who can avoid smiling at the earnestness and Bœotian simplicity (if indeed there be not an underhand satire in it), with which that ‘Incident’ is here brought forward; and, in the Professor’s ambiguous way, as clearly perhaps as he durst in Weissnichtwo, recommended to imitation! Does Teufelsdröckh anticipate that, in this age of refinement, any considerable class of the community, by way of testifying against the ‘Mammon-god,’ and escaping from what he calls ‘Vanity’s Workhouse and Ragfair,’ where doubtless some of them are toiled and whipped and hoodwinked sufficiently,—will sheathe themselves in close-fitting cases of Leather? The idea is ridiculous in the extreme. Will Majesty lay aside its robes of state, and Beauty its frills and train-gowns, for a second-skin of tanned hide? By which change Huddersfield and Manchester, and Coventry and Paisley, and the Fancy-Bazaar, were reduced to hungry solitudes; and only Day and Martin could profit. For neither would Teufelsdröckh’s mad daydream, here as we presume covertly intended, of levelling Society (levelling it indeed with a vengeance, into one huge drowned marsh!), and so attaining the political effects of Nudity without its frigorific or other consequences,—be thereby realised. Would not the rich man purchase a waterproof suit of Russia Leather; and the high-born Belle step-forth in red or azure morocco, lined with shamoy: the black cowhide being left to the Drudges and Gibeonites of the world; and so all the old Distinctions be re-established?
160For us, who are aware of his strong revolutionary beliefs, there’s more to this passage than what appears on the surface. At the same time, who can help but smile at the serious and somewhat naive way (if not with a hint of sarcastic humor) that this ‘Incident’ is presented; and, in the Professor’s ambiguous manner, as clearly as he dares in Weissnichtwo, suggested for others to follow! Does Teufelsdröckh really think that, in this refined age, a significant part of the community, as a way to protest against the ‘Mammon-god’ and escape from what he describes as ‘Vanity’s Workhouse and Ragfair,’ where surely some of them are overworked, mistreated, and deceived enough,—will wrap themselves in tight leather suits? The thought is utterly ridiculous. Will royalty put aside their formal attire, and beauty abandon their elegant gowns and frills for a skin-tight cover made of tanned hide? Such a change would leave Huddersfield and Manchester, along with Coventry and Paisley, and the Fancy-Bazaar, turned into empty wastelands; leaving only Day and Martin to benefit. For neither would Teufelsdröckh’s wild daydream, which we believe he’s suggesting here, of leveling Society (leveling it indeed with a vengeance, into one massive submerged swamp!), and thus achieving the political outcomes of Nudity without its chilling or other drawbacks,—be realized this way. Wouldn’t the wealthy person just buy a waterproof suit made of Russian leather; and wouldn’t the high-born beauty emerge in red or blue morocco, lined with soft leather: leaving the black cowhide for the laborers and the outcasts of the world; thus re-establishing all the old Distinctions?
Or has the Professor his own deeper intention; and laughs in his sleeve at our strictures and glosses, which indeed are but a part thereof?
Or does the Professor have his own deeper intention; and laughs secretly at our criticisms and interpretations, which are really just a part of it?
CHAPTER II
CHAPTER 2
CHURCH-CLOTHES
Not less questionable is his Chapter on Church-Clothes, which has the farther distinction of being the shortest in the Volume. We here translate it entire:
Not less questionable is his Chapter on Church-Clothes, which has the added distinction of being the shortest in the Volume. We here translate it entirely:
‘By Church-Clothes, it need not be premised that I mean infinitely more than Cassocks and Surplices; and do not at all mean the mere haberdasher Sunday Clothes that men go to Church in. Far from it! Church-Clothes are, in our vocabulary, the Forms, the Vestures, under which men have at various periods embodied and represented for themselves the Religious Principle; that is to say, invested The Divine Idea of the World with a sensible and practically active Body, so that it might dwell among them as a living and life-giving Word.
‘By Church-Clothes, I don't just mean robes and surplices; I’m definitely not talking about the casual Sunday clothes that guys wear to church. Not at all! Church-Clothes, in our terminology, refer to the forms, the vestments, through which people have, at different times, expressed and embodied the Religious Principle for themselves. This means giving the Divine Idea of the World a tangible and actively engaging presence, so that it could be among them as a living and life-giving Word.
‘These are unspeakably the most important of all the vestures and garnitures of Human Existence. They are first spun and woven, I may say, by that wonder of wonders, Society; for it is still only when “two or three are gathered together,” that Religion, spiritually existent, and indeed indestructible, however latent, in each, first outwardly manifests itself (as with “cloven tongues of fire”), and seeks to be embodied in a visible Communion and Church Militant. Mystical, more than magical, is that Communing of Soul with Soul, both looking heavenward: here properly Soul first speaks with Soul; for only in looking heavenward, take it in what sense you may, not in looking earthward, does what we can call Union, mutual Love, Society, begin to be possible. How true is that of Novalis: “It is certain my Belief gains quite infinitely the moment I can convince another mind thereof”! Gaze thou in the face of thy Brother, in those eyes where plays the lambent fire of Kindness, or in those where rages the lurid conflagration of Anger; feel how thy own so quiet Soul is straightway involuntarily kindled with the like, and ye blaze and reverberate on each other, till it is all one limitless confluent flame (of embracing Love, or of 162deadly-grappling Hate); and then say what miraculous virtue goes out of man into man. But if so, through all the thick-plied hulls of our Earthly Life; how much more when it is of the Divine Life we speak, and inmost Me is, as it were, brought into contact with inmost Me!
‘These are undeniably the most important aspects of Human Existence. They are first created and shaped, I might say, by that incredible phenomenon, Community; for it is only when “two or three are gathered together” that Religion, existing in spirit and truly indestructible, no matter how hidden, in each person, first publicly reveals itself (like “cloven tongues of fire”) and seeks to be expressed in a visible Community and Church Militant. The connection of Soul with Soul is more mystical than magical, both looking toward the heavens: here, Soul first communicates with Soul; because only when looking up, however you interpret it, not when looking down, does what we can call Union, mutual Love, or Society begin to exist. How true is Novalis's statement: “It is certain my Belief gains quite infinitely the moment I can convince another mind of it”! Look into the eyes of your Brother, where the gentle light of Kindness shines, or where the fierce flames of Anger burn; feel how your own calm Soul is instantly sparked with similar feelings, and you ignite and reflect on one another until it becomes one endless, merging flame (of embracing Love, or of 162 deadly grappling Hate); and then consider what miraculous energy flows from one person to another. But if that’s true, through all the thick layers of our Earthly Life; how much more potent is it when we speak of Divine Life, and the innermost Me connects with the innermost Me!’
‘Thus was it that I said, the Church-Clothes are first spun and woven by Society; outward Religion originates by Society, Society becomes possible by Religion. Nay, perhaps, every conceivable Society, past and present, may well be figured as properly and wholly a Church, in one or other of these three predicaments: an audibly preaching and prophesying Church, which is the best; second, a Church that struggles to preach and prophesy, but cannot as yet, till its Pentecost come; and third and worst, a Church gone dumb with old age, or which only mumbles delirium prior to dissolution. Whoso fancies that by Church is here meant Chapterhouses and Cathedrals, or by preaching and prophesying, mere speech and chanting, let him,’ says the oracular Professor, ‘read on, light of heart (getrosten Muthes).
‘So I said, the Church’s outward appearance is first created by Society; external Religion comes from Society, and Society is made possible by Religion. In fact, perhaps every imaginable Society, both past and present, can really be seen as fully a Church in one of these three situations: first, an actively preaching and prophesying Church, which is the best; second, a Church that is trying to preach and prophesy but hasn’t managed to yet, until its moment of enlightenment arrives; and third and worst, a Church that has gone silent with old age, or which only mumbles incoherently before it fades away. Anyone who thinks that Church refers here to Chapterhouses and Cathedrals, or that preaching and prophesying means just talking and singing, let him,’ says the wise Professor, ‘read on, with a light heart (getrosten Muthes).’
‘But with regard to your Church proper, and the Church-Clothes specially recognised as Church-Clothes, I remark, fearlessly enough, that without such Vestures and sacred Tissues Society has not existed, and will not exist. For if Government is, so to speak, the outward Skin of the Body Politic, holding the whole together and protecting it; and all your Craft-Guilds, and Associations for Industry, of hand or of head, are the Fleshly Clothes, the muscular and osseous Tissues (lying under such Skin), whereby Society stands and works;—then is Religion the inmost Pericardial and Nervous Tissue, which ministers Life and warm Circulation to the whole. Without which Pericardial Tissue the Bones and Muscles (of Industry) were inert, or animated only by a Galvanic vitality; the Skin would become a shrivelled pelt, or fast-rotting raw-hide; and Society itself a dead carcass,—deserving to be buried. Men were no longer Social, but Gregarious; which latter state also could not continue, but must gradually issue in universal selfish discord, hatred, savage isolation, and dispersion;—whereby, as we might continue to 163say, the very dust and dead body of Society would have evaporated and become abolished. Such, and so all-important, all-sustaining, are the Church-Clothes to civilised or even to rational men.
'But when it comes to your Church and the specially recognized Church-Clothes, I will boldly say that without these Vestments and sacred Fabrics, Society would not exist and cannot exist. If the Government is, so to speak, the outer layer of the Body Politic, holding everything together and protecting it; and all your Craft Guilds and Associations for Industry, whether manual or intellectual, are the Fleshly Clothes, the muscular and bony Structures (lying under such Skin), by which Society stands and functions; then Religion is the deepest Pericardial and Nervous Tissue, which provides Life and warm Circulation to the whole. Without this Pericardial Tissue, the Bones and Muscles (of Industry) would be lifeless or only animated by a Galvanic energy; the Skin would become a shriveled pelt or decaying rawhide; and Society itself a lifeless corpse, worthy only of burial. People would no longer be Social, but merely Gregarious; and that state could not last either, ultimately leading to universal selfish discord, hatred, savage isolation, and fragmentation; thus, as we could say, the very dust and remains of Society would dissipate and cease to exist. Such, and so crucial, so sustaining are the Church-Clothes to civilized or even rational people.'
‘Meanwhile, in our era of the World, those same Church-Clothes have gone sorrowfully out-at-elbows; nay, far worse, many of them have become mere hollow Shapes, or Masks, under which no living Figure or Spirit any longer dwells; but only spiders and unclean beetles, in horrid accumulation, drive their trade; and the mask still glares on you with its glass-eyes, in ghastly affectation of Life,—some generation-and-half after Religion has quite withdrawn from it, and in unnoticed nooks is weaving for herself new Vestures, wherewith to reappear, and bless us, or our sons or grandsons. As a Priest, or Interpreter of the Holy, is the noblest and highest of all men, so is a Sham-priest (Schein-priester) the falsest and basest; neither is it doubtful that his Canonicals, were they Popes’ Tiaras, will one day be torn from him, to make bandages for the wounds of mankind; or even to burn into tinder, for general scientific or culinary purposes.
‘Meanwhile, in our time, those same Church Clothes have sadly fallen out of fashion; worse still, many of them have become just empty shapes or masks, under which no living figure or spirit resides anymore; only spiders and filthy beetles, in horrifying numbers, make their home there; and the mask still stares at you with its glassy eyes, in a ghastly imitation of life—some generation and a half after religion has completely retreated from it, and in unnoticed corners is creating new garments for itself, ready to reappear and bless us, or our children or grandchildren. As a priest, or interpreter of the sacred, is the noblest and highest of all people, a sham priest is the most false and lowly; it’s also certain that his ceremonial attire, even if it were the Pope’s tiara, will one day be ripped from him to become bandages for the wounds of humanity, or maybe even to be burned for general scientific or cooking use.
‘All which, as out of place here, falls to be handled in my Second Volume, On the Palingenesia, or Newbirth of Society; which volume, as treating practically of the Wear, Destruction, and Retexture of Spiritual Tissues, or Garments, forms, properly speaking, the Transcendental or ultimate Portion of this my work on Clothes, and is already in a state of forwardness.’
‘All of this, since it doesn’t really belong here, will be addressed in my Second Volume, On the Palingenesia, or Newbirth of Society; this volume, as it deals practically with the Wear, Destruction, and Retexture of Spiritual Tissues, or Garments, is essentially the Transcendental or final part of this work on Clothes, and is already making good progress.’
And herewith, no farther exposition, note, or commentary being added, does Teufelsdröckh, and must his Editor now, terminate the singular chapter on Church-Clothes!
And with that, without any further explanation, notes, or commentary being added, Teufelsdröckh, along with his Editor, will now conclude the unique chapter on Church-Clothes!
CHAPTER III
CHAPTER 3
SYMBOLS
Probably it will elucidate the drift of these foregoing obscure utterances, if we here insert somewhat of our Professor’s speculations on Symbols. To state his whole 164doctrine, indeed, were beyond our compass: nowhere is he more mysterious, impalpable, than in this of ‘Fantasy being the organ of the God-like;’ and how ‘Man thereby, though based, to all seeming, on the small Visible, does nevertheless extend down into the infinite deeps of the Invisible, of which Invisible, indeed, his Life is properly the bodying forth.’ Let us, omitting these high transcendental aspects of the matter, study to glean (whether from the Paper-bags or the Printed Volume) what little seems logical and practical, and cunningly arrange it into such degree of coherence as it will assume. By way of proem, take the following not injudicious remarks:
Most likely it will clarify the direction of these previous unclear statements if we include some of our Professor’s thoughts on Symbols here. Attempting to convey his entire 164doctrine is indeed beyond our scope: he is most mysterious and elusive in his idea that ‘Fantasy is the means of the God-like;’ and how ‘Man, while seemingly grounded in the small Visible, nonetheless reaches into the infinite depths of the Invisible, which truly is the essence of his Life manifesting itself.’ Let us, setting aside these lofty transcendental aspects, try to gather (whether from the Paper-bags or the Printed Volume) what appears logical and practical, and cleverly organize it into whatever level of coherence it may have. As a starting point, consider the following insightful remarks:
‘The benignant efficacies of Concealment,’ cries our Professor, ‘who shall speak or sing? Silence and Secrecy! Altars might still be raised to them (were this an altar-building time) for universal worship. Silence is the element in which great things fashion themselves together; that at length they may emerge, full-formed and majestic, into the daylight of Life, which they are thenceforth to rule. Not William the Silent only, but all the considerable men I have known, and the most undiplomatic and unstrategic of these, forbore to babble of what they were creating and projecting. Nay, in thy own mean perplexities, do thou thyself but hold thy tongue for one day: on the morrow, how much clearer are thy purposes and duties; what wreck and rubbish have those mute workmen within thee swept away, when intrusive noises were shut out! Speech is too often not, as the Frenchman defined it, the art of concealing Thought; but of quite stifling and suspending Thought, so that there is none to conceal. Speech too is great, but not the greatest. As the Swiss Inscription says: Sprechen ist silbern, Schweigen ist golden (Speech is silvern, Silence is golden); or as I might rather express it: Speech is of Time, Silence is of Eternity.
‘The helpful powers of Concealment,’ our Professor exclaims, ‘who will speak or sing? Silence and Privacy! We could still create altars to them (if it were a time for building altars) for everyone to worship. Silence is the environment where great ideas come together; so they can eventually emerge, fully formed and impressive, into the light of Life, which they will then govern. Not just William the Silent, but all the significant people I've known—many of whom were the least diplomatic and strategic— refrained from talking about what they were creating and planning. Even in your own everyday confusion, try keeping quiet for just one day: the next day, how much clearer your goals and responsibilities are; what wreckage and clutter those silent workers within you have cleared away when you shut out distracting noises! Speech often isn’t, as the Frenchman put it, the art of hiding Thought; instead, it stifles and suspends Thought so that there’s nothing to hide. Speech is important, but not the most important. As the Swiss inscription says: Sprechen ist silbern, Schweigen ist golden (Speech is silver, Silence is golden); or as I would put it: Speech belongs to Time, Silence belongs to Eternity.
‘Bees will not work except in darkness; Thought will not work except in Silence; neither will Virtue work except in Secrecy. Let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth! Neither shalt thou prate even to thy own heart of “those secrets known to all.” Is 165not Shame (Schaam) the soil of all Virtue, of all good manners and good morals? Like other plants, Virtue will not grow unless its root be hidden, buried from the eye of the sun. Let the sun shine on it, nay do but look at it privily thyself, the root withers, and no flower will glad thee. O my Friends, when we view the fair clustering flowers that over-wreathe, for example, the Marriage-bower, and encircle man’s life with the fragrance and hues of Heaven, what hand will not smite the foul plunderer that grubs them up by the roots, and with grinning, grunting satisfaction, shows us the dung they flourish in! Men speak much of the Printing-Press with its Newspapers: du Himmel! what are these to Clothes and the Tailor’s Goose?’
‘Bees won’t work unless it’s dark; thoughts won’t flow unless it’s quiet; and virtue won’t thrive unless it’s kept secret. Don’t let your left hand know what your right hand is doing! Don’t even whisper to your own heart about “those secrets everyone knows.” Isn’t Shame (Schaam) the foundation of all Virtue, good manners, and morals? Like other plants, Virtue won’t grow unless its roots are hidden, out of the sun’s view. If the sun shines on it, or if you just look at it even a little, the roots wither, and you won’t see any flowers. Oh my friends, when we admire the beautiful flowers that adorn, for instance, the Marriage-bower, filling our lives with heavenly scents and colors, what hand wouldn’t strike the vile thief that tears them out by the roots and proudly displays the muck they grow in? People talk a lot about the Printing Press and its Newspapers: du Himmel! What are they compared to Clothes and the Tailor’s Needle?’
‘Of kin to the so incalculable influences of Concealment, and connected with still greater things, is the wondrous agency of Symbols. In a Symbol there is concealment and yet revelation: here therefore, by Silence and by Speech acting together, comes a double significance. And if both the Speech be itself high, and the Silence fit and noble, how expressive will their union be! Thus in many a painted Device, or simple Seal-emblem, the commonest Truth stands-out to us proclaimed with quite new emphasis.
‘Connected to the countless influences of Concealment, and related to even greater matters, is the amazing power of Symbols. A Symbol holds both concealment and revelation: thus, through the combination of Silence and Speech, we get a dual significance. If the Speech is elevated and the Silence is appropriate and noble, their union will be incredibly expressive! Therefore, in many painted designs or simple seal-emblems, common Truth emerges with entirely new emphasis.’
‘For it is here that Fantasy with her mystic wonderland plays into the small prose domain of Sense, and becomes incorporated therewith. In the Symbol proper, what we can call a Symbol, there is ever, more or less distinctly and directly, some embodiment and revelation of the Infinite; the Infinite is made to blend itself with the Finite, to stand visible, and as it were, attainable there. By Symbols, accordingly, is man guided and commanded, made happy, made wretched. He everywhere finds himself encompassed with Symbols, recognised as such or not recognised: the Universe is but one vast Symbol of God; nay if thou wilt have it, what is man himself but a Symbol of God; is not all that he does symbolical; a revelation to Sense of the mystic god-given force that is in him; a “Gospel of Freedom,” which he, the “Messias of Nature,” preaches, as he can, by act and word? Not a Hut he builds but is the visible embodiment of a Thought; but bears visible record 166of invisible things; but is, in the transcendental sense, symbolical as well as real.’
‘Here is where Fantasy with her magical wonderland interacts with the small realm of Sense and becomes part of it. In what we can call a Symbol, there is always, more or less distinctly, some embodiment and revelation of the Infinite; the Infinite blends with the Finite, becoming visible and, in a way, attainable. Through Symbols, humans are guided and commanded, made happy, or made miserable. They find themselves surrounded by Symbols, whether recognized as such or not: the Universe is just one massive Symbol of God; indeed, what is man himself but a Symbol of God? Isn’t everything he does symbolical; a revelation to Sense of the mysterious god-given force within him; a “Gospel of Freedom,” which he, the “Messiah of Nature,” preaches as best he can, through actions and words? Not a Hut he builds is without being the visible embodiment of a Thought; it bears visible witness to invisible things; it is, in a transcendental sense, both symbolical and real.’
‘Man,’ says the Professor elsewhere, in quite antipodal contrast with these high-soaring delineations, which we have here cut short on the verge of the inane, ‘Man is by birth somewhat of an owl. Perhaps, too, of all the owleries that ever possessed him, the most owlish, if we consider it, is that of your actually existing Motive-Millwrights. Fantastic tricks enough man has played, in his time; has fancied himself to be most things, down even to an animated heap of Glass; but to fancy himself a dead Iron-Balance for weighing Pains and Pleasures on, was reserved for this his latter era. There stands he, his Universe one huge Manger, filled with hay and thistles to be weighed against each other; and looks long-eared enough. Alas, poor devil! spectres are appointed to haunt him: one age he is hag-ridden, bewitched; the next, priestridden, befooled; in all ages, bedevilled. And now the Genius of Mechanism smothers him worse than any Nightmare did; till the Soul is nigh choked out of him, and only a kind of Digestive, Mechanic life remains. In Earth and in Heaven he can see nothing but Mechanism; has fear for nothing else, hope in nothing else: the world would indeed grind him to pieces; but cannot he fathom the Doctrine of Motives, and cunningly compute these, and mechanise them to grind the other way?
‘Man,’ says the Professor elsewhere, in stark contrast to these lofty descriptions, which we have here cut short on the edge of the ridiculous, ‘Man is by nature somewhat like an owl. Perhaps, too, of all the ways of thinking that have ever possessed him, the most owl-like, if we consider it, is that of your currently existing Motive-Millwrights. Man has played many fantastic tricks throughout his life; he has imagined himself as many different things, even down to an animated pile of Glass; but to believe himself a dead Iron-Balance for weighing Pains and Pleasures was reserved for this later era. There he stands, his Universe one massive Manger, filled with hay and thistles to be weighed against each other; and he looks quite long-eared. Alas, poor guy! Spectres are set to haunt him: one age he is troubled by witches, bewitched; the next, overwhelmed by religious leaders, fooled; in all ages, tormented. And now the Genius of Mechanism suffocates him worse than any Nightmare ever did; until the Soul is nearly choked out of him, and only a sort of Digestive, Mechanical life remains. In Earth and in Heaven, he can see nothing but Mechanism; fears nothing else, hopes in nothing else: the world would indeed grind him to dust; but how can he not understand the Doctrine of Motives, skillfully compute these, and mechanize them to work in his favor?
‘Were he not, as has been said, purblinded by enchantment, you had but to bid him open his eyes and look. In which country, in which time, was it hitherto that man’s history, or the history of any man, went on by calculated or calculable “Motives”? What make ye of your Christianities, and Chivalries, and Reformations, and Marseillese Hymns, and Reigns of Terror? Nay, has not perhaps the Motive-grinder himself been in Love? Did he never stand so much as a contested Election? Leave him to Time, and the medicating virtue of Nature.’
‘If he weren't, as mentioned, blinded by enchantment, all you would have to do is tell him to open his eyes and look. In what country, and in what time, has anyone's history, or the history of any individual, progressed based on calculated or predictable “Motives”? What do you make of your Christianities, Chivalries, Reformations, Marseillese Hymns, and Reigns of Terror? Perhaps the very Motive-grinder has been in Love? Has he ever faced anything like a contested Election? Leave him to Time, and the healing power of Nature.’
‘Yes, Friends,’ elsewhere observes the Professor, ‘not our Logical, Mensurative faculty, but our Imaginative one is King over us; I might say, Priest and Prophet to lead us heavenward; our Magician and 167Wizard to lead us hellward. Nay, even for the basest Sensualist, what is Sense but the implement of Fantasy; the vessel it drinks out of? Ever in the dullest existence there is a sheen either of Inspiration or of Madness (thou partly hast it in thy choice, which of the two), that gleams-in from the circumambient Eternity, and colours with its own hues our little islet of Time. The Understanding is indeed thy window, too clear thou canst not make it; but Fantasy is thy eye, with its colour-giving retina, healthy or diseased. Have not I myself known five-hundred living soldiers sabred into crows’-meat for a piece of glazed cotton, which they called their Flag; which, had you sold it at any market-cross, would not have brought above three groschen? Did not the whole Hungarian Nation rise, like some tumultuous moon-stirred Atlantic, when Kaiser Joseph pocketed their Iron Crown; an Implement, as was sagaciously observed, in size and commercial value little differing from a horse-shoe? It is in and through Symbols that man, consciously or unconsciously, lives, works, and has his being: those ages, moreover, are accounted the noblest which can the best recognise symbolical worth, and prize it the highest. For is not a Symbol ever, to him who has eyes for it, some dimmer or clearer revelation of the Godlike?
‘Yes, Friends,’ the Professor notes elsewhere, ‘it’s not our Logical, Measurable faculty that rules us, but our Imaginative one; I might say it’s our Priest and Prophet guiding us to heaven, our Magician and Wizard leading us to hell. Even for the most basic Sensualist, what is Sense but a tool for Fantasy; the cup it drinks from? Even in the dullest life, there’s a hint of either Inspiration or Madness (you partly choose which one), that shines in from the surrounding Eternity and colors our little island of Time with its own shades. The Understanding is indeed your window; you can’t make it too clear; but Fantasy is your eye, with its color-giving retina, healthy or sick. Haven’t I seen five hundred living soldiers turned into carrion for a piece of glossy cotton they called their Flag, which wouldn’t sell for more than three groschen at any marketplace? Did the whole Hungarian Nation not rise like a chaotic, moon-driven Atlantic when Kaiser Joseph took their Iron Crown; an object that, as was wisely noted, in size and market value was little different from a horseshoe? It is through Symbols that humans, consciously or unconsciously, live, work, and exist: those ages are considered the greatest that can best recognize symbolic worth and value it the most. For isn’t a Symbol always, to those who can see it, some clearer or dimmer revelation of the Godlike?’
‘Of Symbols, however, I remark farther, that they have both an extrinsic and intrinsic value; oftenest the former only. What, for instance, was in that clouted Shoe, which the Peasants bore aloft with them as ensign in their Bauernkrieg (Peasants’ War)? Or in the Wallet-and-staff round which the Netherland Gueux, glorying in that nickname of Beggars, heroically rallied and prevailed, though against King Philip himself? Intrinsic significance these had none: only extrinsic; as the accidental Standards of multitudes more or less sacredly uniting together; in which union itself, as above noted, there is ever something mystical and borrowing of the Godlike. Under a like category, too, stand, or stood, the stupidest heraldic Coats-of-arms; military Banners everywhere; and generally all national or other Sectarian Costumes and Customs: they have no intrinsic, necessary divineness, or even worth; 168but have acquired an extrinsic one. Nevertheless through all these there glimmers something of a Divine Idea; as through military Banners themselves, the Divine Idea of Duty, of heroic Daring; in some instances of Freedom, of Right. Nay, the highest ensign that men ever met and embraced under, the Cross itself, had no meaning save an accidental extrinsic one.
Of Symbols, I further note that they have both external and internal value; most often just the external. What, for example, was in that patched shoe that the peasants carried as their emblem in their Bauernkrieg (Peasants’ War)? Or in the wallet and staff that the Dutch Gueux, proudly known as Beggars, rallied around and triumphed, even against King Philip himself? These had no intrinsic significance; only extrinsic value—as temporary standards uniting people together, more or less sacredly. In this unity, as mentioned earlier, there's always something mystical and transcendent. Under the same idea, we find the most nonsensical heraldic coats of arms; military banners everywhere; and generally all national or other specific costumes and customs: they lack intrinsic, essential divinity or even worth; 168 but have gained an external value. Yet through all these, a glimmer of a Divine Idea shines through; as seen in military banners themselves, the Divine Idea of Duty, of heroic Courage; in some cases, of Freedom, of Justice. Even the highest emblem that people ever gathered around, the Cross itself, had no meaning other than an accidental external one.
‘Another matter it is, however, when your Symbol has intrinsic meaning, and is of itself fit that men should unite round it. Let but the Godlike manifest itself to Sense; let but Eternity look, more or less visibly, through the Time-Figure (Zeitbild)! Then is it fit that men unite there; and worship together before such Symbol; and so from day to day, and from age to age, superadd to it new divineness.
‘However, it’s a different story when your Symbol has intrinsic meaning and is naturally worthy for people to gather around. Just let the divine reveal itself to the senses; let Eternity look, more or less visibly, through the Time-Figure (Zeitbild)! Then it's right for people to come together there and worship as a group before such a Symbol, adding new layers of divinity to it from day to day and from generation to generation.
‘Of this latter sort are all true works of Art: in them (if thou know a Work of Art from a Daub of Artifice) wilt thou discern Eternity looking through Time; the Godlike rendered visible. Here too may an extrinsic value gradually superadd itself: thus certain Iliads, and the like, have, in three-thousand years, attained quite new significance. But nobler than all in this kind, are the Lives of heroic god-inspired Men; for what other Work of Art is so divine? In Death too, in the Death of the Just, as the last perfection of a Work of Art, may we not discern symbolic meaning? In that divinely transfigured Sleep, as of Victory, resting over the beloved face which now knows thee no more, read (if thou canst for tears) the confluence of Time with Eternity, and some gleam of the latter peering through.
‘All true works of art belong to this category: in them (if you know how to tell a genuine work of art from a mere fake) you will see Eternity peering through Time; the Godlike made visible. Here, an outside value can also gradually add itself: for example, certain Iliads and others have gained entirely new significance over three thousand years. But what stands above all in this regard are the Lives of heroic, divinely inspired Men; for what other work of art is so divine? Even in Death, in the death of the Just, as the final perfection of a work of art, can we not see symbolic meaning? In that divinely transformed Sleep, like Victory, resting over the beloved face that can no longer recognize you, read (if you can through your tears) the meeting of Time with Eternity, and a glimpse of the latter shining through.
‘Highest of all Symbols are those wherein the Artist or Poet has risen into Prophet, and all men can recognise a present God, and worship the same: I mean religious Symbols. Various enough have been such religious Symbols, what we call Religions; as men stood in this stage of culture or the other, and could worse or better body-forth the Godlike: some Symbols with a transient intrinsic worth; many with only an extrinsic. If thou ask to what height man has carried it in this manner, look on our divinest Symbol: on Jesus of Nazareth, and his Life, and his Biography, and what followed therefrom. Higher has the human Thought not yet reached: 169this is Christianity and Christendom; a Symbol of quite perennial, infinite character: whose significance will ever demand to be anew inquired into, and anew made manifest.
‘The highest Symbols are those where the Artist or Poet has elevated themselves to the level of a Prophet, and everyone can recognize a present God and worship the same: I’m referring to religious Symbols. There have been many such religious Symbols, what we call Religions; as people existed in one stage of culture or another, they were able to express the divine with varying degrees of success: some Symbols held a temporary intrinsic value; many had only an external value. If you want to see how far humanity has taken this, look at our most divine Symbol: Jesus of Nazareth, his Life, his Biography, and what came from it. Human thought has not yet reached a higher point: 169 this is Christianity and Christendom; a Symbol of lasting, infinite significance, whose meaning will always need to be reexamined and made clear again.
‘But, on the whole, as time adds much to the sacredness of Symbols, so likewise in his progress he at length defaces or even desecrates them; and Symbols, like all terrestrial Garments, wax old. Homer’s Epos has not ceased to be true; yet it is no longer our Epos, but shines in the distance, if clearer and clearer, yet also smaller and smaller, like a receding Star. It needs a scientific telescope, it needs to be reinterpreted and artificially brought near us, before we can so much as know that it was a Sun. So likewise a day comes when the Runic Thor, with his Eddas, must withdraw into dimness; and many an African Mumbo-Jumbo and Indian Pawaw be utterly abolished. For all things, even Celestial Luminaries, much more atmospheric meteors, have their rise, their culmination, their decline.’
‘But overall, just as time enhances the significance of Symbols, it also causes them to become damaged or even tarnished; and Symbols, like all earthly garments, grow old. Homer’s Epic hasn’t lost its truth; yet it is no longer our Epic—it shines in the distance, becoming clearer and clearer, yet also smaller and smaller, like a distant star. It requires a scientific telescope; it needs to be reinterpreted and artificially brought closer to us, before we can even recognize that it was a Sun. Similarly, a time comes when the Runic Thor, with his Eddas, must fade into obscurity; and many an African Mumbo-Jumbo and Indian Pawaw will be completely abolished. For all things, even Celestial Luminaries—let alone atmospheric phenomena—have their rise, their peak, and their decline.’
‘Small is this which thou tellest me, that the Royal Sceptre is but a piece of gilt-wood; that the Pyx has become a most foolish box, and truly, as Ancient Pistol thought, “of little price.” A right Conjuror might I name thee, couldst thou conjure back into these wooden tools the divine virtue they once held.’
‘What you’re telling me is small, that the Royal Sceptre is just a piece of gilded wood; that the Pyx has turned into a silly box, and honestly, as Ancient Pistol believed, “of little value.” I could call you a true magician if you could bring back the divine power these wooden objects once had.’
‘Of this thing, however, be certain: wouldst thou plant for Eternity, then plant into the deep infinite faculties of man, his Fantasy and Heart; wouldst thou plant for Year and Day, then plant into his shallow superficial faculties, his Self-love and Arithmetical Understanding, what will grow there. A Hierarch, therefore, and Pontiff of the World will we call him, the Poet and inspired Maker; who, Prometheus-like, can shape new Symbols, and bring new Fire from Heaven to fix it there. Such too will not always be wanting; neither perhaps now are. Meanwhile, as the average of matters goes, we account him Legislator and wise who can so much as tell when a Symbol has grown old, and gently remove it.
‘Of this, you can be sure: if you want to plant for Eternity, then dig deep into the infinite qualities of humanity, his Imagination and Heart; if you want to plant for a Year and a Day, then focus on his shallow, superficial qualities, his Self-love and Basic Understanding, and that's what will grow there. We'll call him a Hierarch and Pontiff of the World, the Poet and inspired Creator; who, like Prometheus, can create new Symbols and bring new Fire from Heaven to establish it. There will always be such individuals; perhaps they exist now too. Meanwhile, as things usually go, we consider him wise and a Legislator who can recognize when a Symbol has become old and gently replace it.
‘When, as the last English Coronation** That of George IV.—Ed. was preparing,’ 170concludes this wonderful Professor, ‘I read in their Newspapers that the “Champion of England,” he who has to offer battle to the Universe for his new King, had brought it so far that he could now “mount his horse with little assistance,” I said to myself: Here also we have a Symbol well-nigh superannuated. Alas, move whithersoever you may, are not the tatters and rags of superannuated worn-out symbols (in this Ragfair of a World) dropping off everywhere, to hoodwink, to halter, to tether you; nay, if you shake them not aside, threatening to accumulate, and perhaps produce suffocation?’
‘When the last English CoronationUnderstood! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.That of George IV.—Ed. was getting ready,’ 170 concludes this amazing Professor, ‘I read in their newspapers that the “Champion of England,” the one who has to battle the Universe for his new King, had progressed to the point that he could now “mount his horse with little help.” I thought to myself: Here too we have a symbol that’s nearly obsolete. Sadly, no matter where you go, aren’t the tattered remnants of outdated symbols (in this ragtag world) falling off everywhere, to deceive, to restrain, to bind you; indeed, if you don’t shake them off, they might pile up and even suffocate you?’
CHAPTER IV
CHAPTER 4
HELOTAGE
At this point we determine on adverting shortly, or rather reverting, to a certain Tract of Hofrath Heuschrecke’s, entitled Institute for the Repression of Population; which lies, dishonourable enough (with torn leaves, and a perceptible smell of aloetic drugs), stuffed into the Bag Pisces. Not indeed for the sake of the Tract itself, which we admire little; but of the marginal Notes, evidently in Teufelsdröckh’s hand, which rather copiously fringe it. A few of these may be in their right place here.
At this point, we decide to briefly reference again a specific work by Hofrath Heuschrecke, titled Institute for the Repression of Population; which is regrettably (with torn pages and a noticeable smell of aloe vera) crammed into the Bag Pisces. Not because we think highly of the work itself, which we find lacking, but because of the marginal notes, clearly in Teufelsdröckh’s handwriting, that surround it. A few of these may be relevant to share here.
Into the Hofrath’s Institute, with its extraordinary schemes, and machinery of Corresponding Boards and the like, we shall not so much as glance. Enough for us to understand that Heuschrecke is a disciple of Malthus; and so zealous for the doctrine, that his zeal almost literally eats him up. A deadly fear of Population possesses the Hofrath; something like a fixed-idea; undoubtedly akin to the more diluted forms of Madness. Nowhere, in that quarter of his intellectual world, is there light; nothing but a grim shadow of Hunger; open mouths opening wider and wider; a world to terminate by the frightfullest consummation: by its too dense inhabitants, famished into delirium, universally 171eating one another. To make air for himself in which strangulation, choking enough to a benevolent heart, the Hofrath founds, or proposes to found, this Institute of his, as the best he can do. It is only with our Professor’s comments thereon that we concern ourselves.
We won't even take a look at the Hofrath's Institute, with its complex plans and systems of Corresponding Boards and the like. It's enough for us to know that Heuschrecke is a follower of Malthus; his passion for the idea is so intense that it nearly consumes him. The Hofrath is gripped by a deep fear of population growth; it resembles a fixed idea and is likely related to the more mild forms of insanity. There’s no light in that part of his intellectual world; only a grim shadow of Hunger, with open mouths stretching wider and wider— a world doomed to end in the most terrifying way: its overpopulation driving people into madness, where they end up devouring one another. To create some space for himself in a choking environment, the Hofrath proposes to establish this Institute as the best solution he can come up with. We only focus on our Professor’s comments about it.
First, then, remark that Teufelsdröckh, as a speculative Radical, has his own notions about human dignity; that the Zähdarm palaces and courtesies have not made him forgetful of the Futteral cottages. On the blank cover of Heuschrecke’s Tract we find the following indistinctly engrossed:
First, note that Teufelsdröckh, as a speculative radical, has his own ideas about human dignity; the Zähdarm palaces and social niceties haven't made him forget about the Futteral cottages. On the blank cover of Heuschrecke’s Tract, we find the following vaguely written:
‘Two men I honour, and no third. First, the toil-worn Craftsman that with earth-made Implement laboriously conquers the Earth, and makes her man’s. Venerable to me is the hard Hand; crooked, coarse; wherein notwithstanding lies a cunning virtue, indefeasibly royal, as of the Sceptre of this Planet. Venerable too is the rugged face, all weather-tanned, besoiled, with its rude intelligence; for it is the face of a Man living manlike. O, but the more venerable for thy rudeness, and even because we must pity as well as love thee! Hardly-entreated Brother! For us was thy back so bent, for us were thy straight limbs and fingers so deformed: thou wert our Conscript, on whom the lot fell, and fighting our battles wert so marred. For in thee too lay a god-created Form, but it was not to be unfolded; encrusted must it stand with the thick adhesions and defacements of Labour: and thy body, like thy soul, was not to know freedom. Yet toil on, toil on: thou art in thy duty, be out of it who may; thou toilest for the altogether indispensable, for daily bread.
‘There are two men I respect, and no one else. First, the hardworking Craftsman who, with tools made from the earth, tirelessly conquers the land and makes it belong to mankind. I hold the rough hand in high esteem; it's crooked and calloused, yet within it lies a clever strength, undeniably royal, like the Sceptre of this Planet. Also venerable is the rugged face, weathered and dirty, with its raw intelligence; it represents a man living life authentically. Oh, but you're even more admirable for your roughness, and because we must feel both pity and love for you! Poor Brother! Your back is bent for us, your limbs and fingers twisted for our sake: you were our soldier, chosen to bear this burden, and in fighting our battles, you were left scarred. For inside you was a divinely created form, but it was never able to emerge; it must remain covered in the heavy marks and deformities of labor: your body, like your soul, will never know freedom. Yet keep working, keep working: you are fulfilling your duty, no matter who else isn't; you toil for what is absolutely necessary, for daily bread.
‘A second man I honour, and still more highly: Him who is seen toiling for the spiritually indispensable; not daily bread, but the bread of Life. Is not he too in his duty; endeavouring towards inward Harmony; revealing this, by act or by word, through all his outward endeavours, be they high or low? Highest of all, when his outward and his inward endeavour are one: when we can name him Artist; not earthly Craftsman only, but inspired Thinker, who with heaven-made Implement conquers Heaven for us! If the poor and humble toil that we have Food, must not the high and 172glorious toil for him in return, that he have Light, have Guidance, Freedom, Immortality?—These two, in all their degrees, I honour: all else is chaff and dust, which let the wind blow whither it listeth.
‘A second man I respect, and even more: The one who is working hard for what’s spiritually essential; not just daily food, but the nourishment of Life. Isn’t he also fulfilling his duty; striving for inner Harmony; showing this through action or speech, in all his outward efforts, whether they are grand or simple? Most admirable of all, when his external and internal efforts are one: when we can call him an Artist; not just a skilled Worker on earth, but an inspired Thinker, who with tools crafted by heaven conquers the heavens for us! If the poor and humble work so we have Food, shouldn’t the great and 172noble labor be for him in return, so he may have Light, Guidance, Freedom, Immortality?—These two, in all their forms, are who I honor: everything else is just chaff and dust, which let the wind blow wherever it wants.
‘Unspeakably touching is it, however, when I find both dignities united; and he that must toil outwardly for the lowest of man’s wants, is also toiling inwardly for the highest. Sublimer in this world know I nothing than a Peasant Saint, could such now anywhere be met with. Such a one will take thee back to Nazareth itself; thou wilt see the splendour of Heaven spring forth from the humblest depths of Earth, like a light shining in great darkness.’
‘It's incredibly touching, however, when I see both dignities united; the one who works hard for the most basic needs of humanity is also working deeply for the highest ideals. I know nothing more sublime in this world than a Peasant Saint, if such a person could still be found. Someone like that will take you back to Nazareth itself; you'll see the brilliance of Heaven coming forth from the humblest depths of Earth, like a light shining in great darkness.’
And again: ‘It is not because of his toils that I lament for the poor: we must all toil, or steal (howsoever we name our stealing), which is worse; no faithful workman finds his task a pastime. The poor is hungry and a-thirst; but for him also there is food and drink: he is heavy-laden and weary; but for him also the Heavens send Sleep, and of the deepest; in his smoky cribs, a clear dewy heaven of Rest envelops him, and fitful glitterings of cloud-skirted Dreams. But what I do mourn over is, that the lamp of his soul should go out; that no ray of heavenly, or even of earthly knowledge, should visit him; but only, in the haggard darkness, like two spectres, Fear and Indignation bear him company. Alas, while the Body stands so broad and brawny, must the soul lie blinded, dwarfed, stupefied, almost annihilated! Alas, was this too a Breath of God; bestowed in Heaven, but on earth never to be unfolded!—That there should one Man die ignorant who had capacity for Knowledge, this I call a tragedy, were it to happen more than twenty times in the minute, as by some computations it does. The miserable fraction of Science which our united Mankind, in a wide Universe of Nescience, has acquired, why is not this, with all diligence, imparted to all?’
And once again: “I don’t feel sorry for the poor just because of their hard work. We all have to work or steal (whatever we want to call it), which is worse; no honest worker finds their job enjoyable. The poor are hungry and thirsty, but there’s still food and drink for them; they’re burdened and tired, but the heavens provide sleep, deep sleep at that; in their smoky homes, they are wrapped in a clear, dewy sky of rest, filled with fleeting hints of dreamy visions. What I truly mourn is that the light of their soul should extinguish; that no glimmer of heavenly or even earthly knowledge should reach them, but only the haunting shadows of Fear and Anger keeping them company in the grim darkness. Oh, while the body remains so strong and robust, must the soul be blind, stunted, numb, almost destroyed! Oh, was this too a breath of God; given in Heaven, but never to be realized on Earth!—That one person should die ignorant who had the ability to learn, I call a tragedy, even if it happens more than twenty times a minute, as some calculations suggest. The tiny bit of knowledge that our united humanity has gained, in a vast universe of ignorance, why is it not shared diligently with everyone?”
Quite in an opposite strain is the following: ‘The old Spartans had a wiser method; and went out and hunted-down their Helots, and speared and spitted them, when they grew too numerous. With our improved fashions of hunting, Herr Hofrath, now after 173the invention of fire-arms, and standing-armies, how much easier were such a hunt! Perhaps in the most thickly-peopled country, some three days annually might suffice to shoot all the able-bodied Paupers that had accumulated within the year. Let Governments think of this. The expense were trifling: nay the very carcasses would pay it. Have them salted and barrelled; could not you victual therewith, if not Army and Navy, yet richly such infirm Paupers, in workhouses and elsewhere, as enlightened Charity, dreading no evil of them, might see good to keep alive?’
In a completely different tone, consider this: "The old Spartans had a smarter approach; they went out and hunted down their Helots, spearing and cooking them when their numbers got too high. With our modern methods of hunting, Herr Hofrath, especially after the invention of firearms and standing armies, how much easier would that kind of hunt be! Perhaps in the most densely populated country, just three days a year might be enough to shoot all the able-bodied poor that had piled up within that time. Let Governments think about this. The cost would be minimal; in fact, the bodies could cover it. If you salted and barrelled them, wouldn’t you be able to feed not just the Army and Navy, but also those needy people in workhouses and elsewhere, whom enlightened Charity — without fearing them — might want to keep alive?"
‘And yet,’ writes he farther on, ‘there must be something wrong. A full-formed Horse will, in any market, bring from twenty to as high as two-hundred Friedrichs d’or: such is his worth to the world. A full-formed Man is not only worth nothing to the world, but the world could afford him a round sum would he simply engage to go and hang himself. Nevertheless, which of the two was the more cunningly-devised article, even as an Engine? Good Heavens! A white European Man, standing on his two Legs, with his two five-fingered Hands at his shackle-bones, and miraculous Head on his shoulders, is worth, I should say, from fifty to a hundred Horses!’
‘And yet,’ he writes later, ‘there must be something wrong. A fully-formed horse will, in any marketplace, bring anywhere from twenty to as high as two hundred Friedrichs d’or: that’s his value to the world. A fully-formed man is not only worth nothing to the world, but the world would even pay him a good amount if he just agreed to go and hang himself. Nevertheless, which of the two is the more cleverly designed creation, even as a machine? Good heavens! A white European man, standing on his two legs, with his two five-fingered hands at his shackle-bones, and miraculous head on his shoulders, is worth, I would say, anywhere from fifty to a hundred horses!’
‘True, thou Gold-Hofrath,’ cries the Professor elsewhere: ‘too crowded indeed! Meanwhile, what portion of this inconsiderable terraqueous Globe have ye actually tilled and delved, till it will grow no more? How thick stands your Population in the Pampas and Savannas of America; round ancient Carthage, and in the interior of Africa; on both slopes of the Altaic chain, in the central Platform of Asia; in Spain, Greece, Turkey, Crim Tartary, the Curragh of Kildare? One man, in one year, as I have understood it, if you lend him Earth, will feed himself and nine others. Alas, where now are the Hengsts and Alarics of our still-glowing, still-expanding Europe; who, when their home is grown too narrow, will enlist, and, like Fire-pillars, guide onwards those superfluous masses of indomitable living Valour; equipped, not now with the battle-axe and war-chariot, but with the steam-engine and ploughshare? Where are they?—Preserving their Game!’
‘True, you Gold-Hofrath,’ the Professor exclaims elsewhere, ‘it really is too crowded! Meanwhile, what part of this insignificant globe have you actually farmed and cultivated until it will produce no more? How dense is your population in the Pampas and Savannas of America; around ancient Carthage, and in the heart of Africa; on both sides of the Altaic mountain range, in central Asia; in Spain, Greece, Turkey, Crimea, and the Curragh of Kildare? I have heard that one person, in one year, if given land, can feed themselves and nine others. Alas, where are the Hengsts and Alarics of our still-bright, still-growing Europe; those who, when their home becomes too small, will enlist and, like pillars of fire, will lead those excess masses of unstoppable living Valor; equipped now not with battle-axes and war chariots, but with steam engines and plows? Where are they?—Protecting their Game!’
CHAPTER V
CHAPTER 5
THE PHŒNIX
Putting which four singular Chapters together, and alongside of them numerous hints, and even direct utterances, scattered over these Writings of his, we come upon the startling yet not quite unlooked-for conclusion, that Teufelsdröckh is one of those who consider Society, properly so called, to be as good as extinct; and that only the gregarious feelings, and old inherited habitudes, at this juncture, hold us from Dispersion, and universal national, civil, domestic and personal war! He says expressly: ‘For the last three centuries, above all for the last three quarters of a century, that same Pericardial Nervous Tissue (as we named it) of Religion, where lies the Life-essence of Society, has been smote-at and perforated, needfully and needlessly; till now it is quite rent into shreds; and Society, long pining, diabetic, consumptive, can be regarded as defunct; for those spasmodic, galvanic sprawlings are not life; neither indeed will they endure, galvanise as you may, beyond two days.’
Bringing together these four distinct Chapters, along with many hints and even direct statements found throughout his writings, we reach the surprising, yet somewhat expected, conclusion that Teufelsdröckh sees Society, in the true sense, as nearly extinct. Only our instinctual social feelings and inherited habits are keeping us from breaking apart and plunging into widespread national, civil, domestic, and personal conflict! He explicitly states: ‘For the last three centuries, especially in the last seventy-five years, that same Pericardial Nervous Tissue (as we called it) of Religion, which holds the life essence of Society, has been repeatedly attacked and torn apart, both necessary and unnecessary; until now it is completely in tatters; and Society, long suffering, diabetic, and consumptive, can be seen as dead; because those spasmodic, electric twitches aren’t life; nor will they last, no matter how you try to stimulate them, beyond two days.’
‘Call ye that a Society,’ cries he again, ‘where there is no longer any Social Idea extant; not so much as the Idea of a common Home, but only of a common over-crowded Lodging-house? Where each, isolated, regardless of his neighbour, turned against his neighbour, clutches what he can get, and cries “Mine!” and calls it Peace, because, in the cut-purse and cut-throat Scramble, no steel knives, but only a far cunninger sort, can be employed? Where Friendship, Communion, has become an incredible tradition; and your holiest Sacramental Supper is a smoking Tavern Dinner, with Cook for Evangelist? Where your Priest has no tongue but for plate-licking: and your high Guides and Governors cannot guide; but on all hands hear it passionately proclaimed: Laissez faire; Leave us alone of your guidance, such light is darker than darkness; eat you your wages, and sleep!
‘Is this what you call a Society,’ he shouts again, ‘where there’s no Social Idea left; not even the Idea of a shared Home, but just a crowded Lodging-house? Where everyone is isolated, indifferent to their neighbors, turning against each other, grabbing whatever they can, shouting “Mine!” and calling it Peace, simply because in the scramble for survival, no sharp knives, but only a more cunning kind can be used? Where Friendship, Community has become an unbelievable tradition; and your holiest Sacramental Supper is just a dinner at a smoky Tavern, with the Cook as the Evangelist? Where your Priest only speaks for those who want to get rich: and your leaders can’t lead; but on all sides, you hear it passionately proclaimed: Laissez faire; Leave us out of your guidance, such light is darker than darkness; you take your pay, and go to sleep!’
‘Thus, too,’ continues he, ‘does an observant eye discern everywhere that saddest spectacle: The Poor 175perishing, like neglected, foundered Draught-Cattle, of Hunger and Over-work; the Rich, still more wretchedly, of Idleness, Satiety, and Over-growth. The Highest in rank, at length, without honour from the Lowest; scarcely, with a little mouth-honour, as from tavern-waiters who expect to put it in the bill. Once-sacred Symbols fluttering as empty Pageants, whereof men grudge even the expense; a World becoming dismantled: in one word, the Church fallen speechless, from obesity and apoplexy; the State shrunken into a Police-Office, straitened to get its pay!’
‘Similarly,’ he continues, ‘an observant eye can see that sad sight everywhere: The Poor, suffering and dying like overworked, neglected draft animals, from Hunger and Exhaustion; the Rich, in an even more pitiful state, from Laziness, Excess, and Overindulgence. The highest rank ultimately receives no respect from the lowest; barely a little praise now and then, like from waitstaff at a bar who expect to be tipped. Once-sacred Symbols now merely float as empty displays, with people begrudging even the cost; a world falling apart: in short, the Church has become mute, overwhelmed by excess; the State has shrunk down to a mere Police Station, struggling to collect its fees!’
We might ask, are there many ‘observant eyes,’ belonging to practical men in England or elsewhere, which have descried these phenomena; or is it only from the mystic elevation of a German Wahngasse that such wonders are visible? Teufelsdröckh contends that the aspect of a ‘deceased or expiring Society’ fronts us everywhere, so that whoso runs may read. ‘What, for example,’ says he, ‘is the universally-arrogated Virtue, almost the sole remaining Catholic Virtue, of these days? For some half century, it has been the thing you name “Independence.” Suspicion of “Servility,” of reverence for Superiors, the very dogleech is anxious to disavow. Fools! Were your Superiors worthy to govern, and you worthy to obey, reverence for them were even your only possible freedom. Independence, in all kinds, is rebellion; if unjust rebellion, why parade it, and everywhere prescribe it?’
We might ask, are there many ‘observant eyes’ belonging to practical people in England or elsewhere that have noticed these phenomena, or is it only from the mystic height of a German Wahngasse that such wonders can be seen? Teufelsdröckh argues that the state of a ‘deceased or dying Society’ is visible everywhere, so that anyone can see it. ‘What, for example,’ he says, ‘is the universally-claimed Virtue, almost the only remaining widely-accepted Virtue of these times? For about half a century, it has been what you call “Independence.” There’s a suspicion of “Servility,” a lack of respect for Superiors, which even the lowest of us is eager to deny. Fools! If your Superiors were deserving to lead, and you were deserving to follow, respect for them would even be your only true freedom. Independence, in all forms, is rebellion; if it’s unjust rebellion, why flaunt it and insist on it everywhere?’
But what then? Are we returning, as Rousseau prayed, to the state of Nature? ‘The Soul Politic having departed,’ says Teufelsdröckh, ‘what can follow but that the Body Politic be decently interred, to avoid putrescence! Liberals, Economists, Utilitarians enough I see marching with its bier, and chanting loud pæans, towards the funeral-pile, where, amid wailings from some, and saturnalian revelries from the most, the venerable Corpse is to be burnt. Or, in plain words, that these men, Liberals, Utilitarians, or whatsoever they are called, will ultimately carry their point, and dissever and destroy most existing Institutions of Society, seems a thing which has some time ago ceased to be doubtful.
But what happens next? Are we going back, as Rousseau hoped, to a natural state? ‘With the Soul of the State gone,’ says Teufelsdröckh, ‘what can follow but that the Body of the State be respectfully buried to prevent decay? I see plenty of Liberals, Economists, and Utilitarians showing up to carry its coffin and loudly singing hymns as they head toward the funeral pyre, where, amid the mourning of some and wild celebrations of others, the respected remains will be burned. In simpler terms, it seems clear that these people—Liberals, Utilitarians, or whatever they call themselves—will eventually get their way and dismantle and destroy most of the current institutions of society, which is something that has been obvious for some time now.
176‘Do we not see a little subdivision of the grand Utilitarian Armament come to light even in insulated England? A living nucleus, that will attract and grow, does at length appear there also; and under curious phasis; properly as the inconsiderable fag-end, and so far in the rear of the others as to fancy itself the van. Our European Mechanisers are a sect of boundless diffusion, activity, and co-operative spirit: has not Utilitarianism flourished in high places of Thought, here among ourselves, and in every European country, at some time or other, within the last fifty years? If now in all countries, except perhaps England, it has ceased to flourish, or indeed to exist, among Thinkers, and sunk to Journalists and the popular mass,—who sees not that, as hereby it no longer preaches, so the reason is, it now needs no Preaching, but is in full universal Action, the doctrine everywhere known, and enthusiastically laid to heart? The fit pabulum, in these times, for a certain rugged workshop intellect and heart, nowise without their corresponding workshop strength and ferocity, it requires but to be stated in such scenes to make proselytes enough.—Admirably calculated for destroying, only not for rebuilding! It spreads like a sort of Dog-madness; till the whole World-kennel will be rabid: then woe to the Huntsmen, with or without their whips! They should have given the quadrupeds water,’ adds he; ‘the water, namely, of Knowledge and of Life, while it was yet time.’
176“Don’t we see a small part of the grand Utilitarian movement emerging, even in isolated England? A living core that will attract and grow finally appears there too; and in a strange way, it seems like a minor afterthought, so far behind the others that it imagines itself at the front. Our European thinkers are a group full of wide-reaching influence, energy, and cooperative spirit: hasn't Utilitarianism thrived in influential circles of Thought, here among us, and in every European country, at one time or another, over the last fifty years? If now, in all countries, except perhaps England, it has stopped flourishing, or even existing, among Thinkers, and has descended to Journalists and the general public—who doesn’t see that, since it no longer preaches, the reason is that it doesn’t need to preach anymore, as it is already in full universal Action, the doctrine widely recognized and passionately embraced? It offers exactly what’s needed these days for a certain rugged mindset and spirit, along with their corresponding strength and intensity, stated in the right context to gather plenty of followers. It’s excellently suited for destruction but not for rebuilding! It spreads like a sort of frenzy; soon the entire World will be in chaos: then trouble for the Hunters, with or without their whips! They should have given the animals water,” he adds; “the water of Knowledge and Life, while there was still time.”
Thus, if Professor Teufelsdröckh can be relied on, we are at this hour in a most critical condition; beleaguered by that boundless ‘Armament of Mechanisers’ and Unbelievers, threatening to strip us bare! ‘The world,’ says he, ‘as it needs must, is under a process of devastation and waste, which, whether by silent assiduous corrosion, or open quicker combustion, as the case chances, will effectually enough annihilate the past Forms of Society; replace them with what it may. For the present, it is contemplated that when man’s whole Spiritual Interests are once divested, these innumerable stript-off Garments shall mostly be burnt; but the sounder Rags among them be quilted together into one huge Irish watchcoat for the defence of the 177Body only!’—This, we think, is but Job’s-news to the humane reader.
Thus, if we can trust Professor Teufelsdröckh, we are in a very critical situation right now; surrounded by that endless 'Armament of Mechanisers' and Unbelievers, threatening to strip us bare! 'The world,' he says, 'is inevitably going through a process of devastation and waste, which, whether by slow, steady erosion or rapid combustion, will effectively annihilate the past Forms of Society; and replace them with whatever comes next. For now, it is expected that once man's entire Spiritual Interests are divested, most of these countless stripped-off Garments will be burned; but the better Rags among them will be patched together into one large Irish overcoat for the protection of the 177Body only!'—We think this is nothing but bad news for the compassionate reader.
‘Nevertheless,’ cries Teufelsdröckh, ‘who can hinder it; who is there that can clutch into the wheel-spokes of Destiny, and say to the Spirit of the Time: Turn back, I command thee?—Wiser were it that we yielded to the Inevitable and Inexorable, and accounted even this the best.’
‘Nevertheless,’ shouts Teufelsdröckh, ‘who can stop it; who can reach into the gears of Destiny and tell the Spirit of the Time: Turn back, I order you?—It would be smarter for us to accept the Inevitable and Unchangeable, and even consider this the best option.’
Nay, might not an attentive Editor, drawing his own inferences from what stands written, conjecture that Teufelsdröckh individually had yielded to this same ‘Inevitable and Inexorable’ heartily enough; and now sat waiting the issue, with his natural diabolico-angelical Indifference, if not even Placidity? Did we not hear him complain that the World was a ‘huge Ragfair,’ and the ‘rags and tatters of old Symbols’ were raining-down everywhere, like to drift him in, and suffocate him? What with those ‘unhunted Helots’ of his; and the uneven sic-vos-non-vobis pressure and hard-crashing collision he is pleased to discern in existing things; what with the so hateful ’empty Masks,’ full of beetles and spiders, yet glaring out on him, from their glass eyes, ‘with a ghastly affectation of life,’—we feel entitled to conclude him even willing that much should be thrown to the Devil, so it were but done gently! Safe himself in that ‘Pinnacle of Weissnichtwo,’ he would consent, with a tragic solemnity, that the monster Utilitaria, held back, indeed, and moderated by nose-rings, halters, foot-shackles, and every conceivable modification of rope, should go forth to do her work;—to tread down old ruinous Palaces and Temples with her broad hoof, till the whole were trodden down, that new and better might be built! Remarkable in this point of view are the following sentences.
No, could an attentive editor, drawing his own conclusions from what's written, suggest that Teufelsdröckh had also succumbed to this same ‘Inevitable and Inexorable’ quite willingly; and now sat waiting for the outcome, with his naturally devilishly angelic indifference, if not even calm? Didn't we hear him complain that the world was a ‘huge rag fair,’ and that the ‘rags and tatters of old symbols’ were raining down everywhere, threatening to engulf and suffocate him? With those ‘unhunted Helots’ of his; and the uneven sic-vos-non-vobis pressure and hard-crashing collision he perceives in existing things; and those loathsome ‘empty masks,’ full of beetles and spiders, glaring back at him with their glassy eyes, ‘with a ghastly affectation of life’—we feel justified in concluding that he would even be willing for much to be tossed to the devil, as long as it were done gently! Safe in that ‘pinnacle of Weissnichtwo,’ he would agree, with tragic seriousness, that the monster Utility, indeed held back and restrained by nose rings, halters, foot shackles, and every conceivable twist of rope, should go forth to do her work; to trample down old crumbling palaces and temples with her broad hoof, until everything is flattened, so that new and better can be built! The following sentences are remarkable in this regard.
‘Society,’ says he, ‘is not dead: that Carcass, which you call dead Society, is but her mortal coil which she has shuffled off, to assume a nobler; she herself, through perpetual metamorphoses, in fairer and fairer development, has to live till Time also merge in Eternity. Wheresoever two or three Living Men are gathered together, there is Society; or there it will be, with its cunning mechanisms and stupendous structures, 178overspreading this little Globe, and reaching upwards to Heaven and downwards to Gehenna: for always, under one or the other figure, it has two authentic Revelations, of a God and of a Devil; the Pulpit, namely, and the Gallows.’
‘Society,’ he says, ‘is not dead: that body you refer to as dead Society is just the physical form it has shed to take on a higher one; Society itself, through constant changes, is evolving into something better and better, and it will continue to exist until Time merges into Eternity. Wherever two or three Living People come together, there is Society; or it will be there, with its clever systems and amazing structures, covering this little globe and reaching up to Heaven and down to Hell: for always, under one name or another, it has two true revelations, of a God and of a Devil; that is, the Pulpit and the Gallows.’
Indeed, we already heard him speak of ‘Religion, in unnoticed nooks, weaving for herself new Vestures’;—Teufelsdröckh himself being one of the loom-treadles? Elsewhere he quotes without censure that strange aphorism of Saint-Simon’s, concerning which and whom so much were to be said: L’âge d’or, qu’une aveugle tradition a placé jusqu’ici dans le passé, est devant nous; The golden age, which a blind tradition has hitherto placed in the Past, is Before us.’—But listen again:
Indeed, we’ve already heard him talk about ‘Religion, in overlooked corners, creating new clothes for herself’;—is Teufelsdröckh himself one of the loom’s treadles? Elsewhere, he quotes without criticism that strange saying from Saint-Simon, about which so much could be said: L’âge d’or, qu’une aveugle tradition a placé jusqu’ici dans le passé, est devant nous; The golden age, which a blind tradition has so far situated in the Past, is in front of us.’—But listen again:
‘When the Phœnix is fanning her funeral pyre, will there not be sparks flying! Alas, some millions of men, and among them such as a Napoleon, have already been licked into that high-eddying Flame, and like moths consumed there. Still also have we to fear that incautious beards will get singed.
‘When the Phoenix is fanning her funeral pyre, won't there be sparks flying! Sadly, millions of men, including someone like Napoleon, have already been caught in that raging Flame, and like moths, they've been burned up. We also have to worry that careless beards will get singed.
‘For the rest, in what year of grace such Phœnix-cremation will be completed, you need not ask. The law of Perseverance is among the deepest in man: by nature he hates change; seldom will he quit his old house till it has actually fallen about his ears. Thus have I seen Solemnities linger as Ceremonies, sacred Symbols as idle-Pageants, to the extent of three-hundred years and more after all life and sacredness had evaporated out of them. And then, finally, what time the Phœnix Death-Birth itself will require, depends on unseen contingencies.—Meanwhile, would Destiny offer Mankind, that after, say two centuries of convulsion and conflagration, more or less vivid, the fire-creation should be accomplished, and we too find ourselves again in a Living Society, and no longer fighting but working,—were it not perhaps prudent in Mankind to strike the bargain?’
‘As for when this Phoenix-like rebirth will actually happen, that’s anyone's guess. The law of perseverance runs deep in people: by nature, we resist change; most of us won’t leave our old homes until they literally crumble around us. I’ve seen traditions stick around as ceremonies and sacred symbols turn into mere spectacles for over three hundred years, long after all meaning has vanished from them. Ultimately, how long the Phoenix's death and rebirth will take depends on unknown factors. In the meantime, if fate were to offer humanity a chance, after, let’s say, two centuries of turmoil and destruction, to create something new and find ourselves in a living society again, working together instead of fighting—wouldn’t it be wise for us to consider that deal?’
Thus is Teufelsdröckh content that old sick Society should be deliberately burnt (alas! with quite other fuel than spicewood); in the faith that she is a Phœnix; and that a new heaven-born young one will rise out of 179her ashes! We ourselves, restricted to the duty of Indicator, shall forbear commentary. Meanwhile, will not the judicious reader shake his head, and reproachfully, yet more in sorrow than in anger, say or think: From a Doctor utriusque Juris, titular Professor in a University, and man to whom hitherto, for his services, Society, bad as she is, has given not only food and raiment (of a kind), but books, tobacco and gukguk, we expected more gratitude to his benefactress; and less of a blind trust in the future, which resembles that rather of a philosophical Fatalist and Enthusiast, than of a solid householder paying scot-and-lot in a Christian country.
So Teufelsdröckh believes that the old, sick Society should be purposely burned down (unfortunately, with quite different fuel than spicewood); trusting that it’s a Phoenix and that a new, heaven-sent version will rise out of 179its ashes! We, limited to the role of Indicator, will hold back our comments. In the meantime, won’t the discerning reader shake their head and, more in sorrow than in anger, say or think: From a Doctor utriusque Juris, a titled Professor at a University, and a man to whom Society, as terrible as it is, has previously provided not just food and clothing (of a sort), but also books, tobacco, and gukguk, we expected more appreciation for his benefactor; and less of a blind faith in the future, which resembles more that of a philosophical Fatalist and Enthusiast than that of a practical householder paying taxes in a Christian nation.
CHAPTER VI
CHAPTER 6
OLD CLOTHES
As mentioned above, Teufelsdröckh, though a sansculottist, is in practice probably the politest man extant: his whole heart and life are penetrated and informed with the spirit of politeness; a noble natural Courtesy shines through him, beautifying his vagaries; like sunlight, making a rosy-fingered, rainbow-dyed Aurora out of mere aqueous clouds; nay brightening London-smoke itself into gold vapour, as from the crucible of an alchemist. Hear in what earnest though fantastic wise he expresses himself on this head:
As mentioned above, Teufelsdröckh, even though he identifies as a sansculottist, is likely the most polite person around. His entire heart and life are filled with a spirit of politeness; a natural nobility shines through him, enhancing his quirks, much like sunlight transforms ordinary clouds into a beautiful, colorful dawn. Even the smoky air of London appears golden, as if produced by an alchemist's crucible. Listen to how seriously, though whimsically, he expresses himself on this topic:
‘Shall Courtesy be done only to the rich, and only by the rich? In Good-breeding, which differs, if at all, from High-breeding, only as it gracefully remembers the rights of others, rather than gracefully insists on its own rights, I discern no special connexion with wealth or birth: but rather that it lies in human nature itself, and is due from all men towards all men. Of a truth, were your Schoolmaster at his post, and worth anything when there, this, with so much else, would be reformed. Nay, each man were then also his neighbour’s schoolmaster; till at length a rude-visaged, unmannered Peasant could no more be met with, than a Peasant 180unacquainted with botanical Physiology, or who felt not that the clod he broke was created in Heaven.
‘Should courtesy only be shown to the rich, and only by the rich? Good breeding, which is different from high breeding mainly in how it respectfully acknowledges the rights of others rather than just insisting on its own rights, has no special connection to wealth or status. Instead, it’s part of human nature itself and is owed by everyone to everyone. Truly, if your schoolmaster was doing his job and was effective, this, along with so much else, would be changed. In fact, every person would then also be their neighbor’s teacher; until eventually, a rough-looking, rude peasant would be as rare as a peasant who didn’t understand basic botany or didn’t realize that the soil they were tilling was created in Heaven. 180’
‘For whether thou bear a sceptre or a sledgehammer, art thou not ALIVE; is not this thy brother ALIVE? “There is but one temple in the world,” says Novalis, “and that temple is the Body of Man. Nothing is holier than this high Form. Bending before men is a reverence done to this Revelation in the Flesh. We touch Heaven, when we lay our hands on a human Body.”
‘Whether you hold a scepter or a sledgehammer, aren't you Living; isn't this your brother Living? “There is only one temple in the world,” says Novalis, “and that temple is the Body of Man. Nothing is more sacred than this great Form. Showing respect to people is a reverence for this Revelation in the Flesh. We touch Heaven when we lay our hands on a human Body.”
‘On which ground, I would fain carry it farther than most do; and whereas the English Johnson only bowed to every Clergyman, or man with a shovel-hat, I would bow to every Man with any sort of hat, or with no hat whatever. Is not he a Temple, then; the visible Manifestation and Impersonation of the Divinity? And yet, alas, such indiscriminate bowing serves not. For there is a Devil dwells in man, as well as a Divinity; and too often the bow is but pocketed by the former. It would go to the pocket of Vanity (which is your clearest phasis of the Devil, in these times); therefore must we withhold it.
‘For that reason, I want to take it further than most do; while the English Johnson only bowed to every clergyman or man with a shovel hat, I would bow to every man with any kind of hat or even no hat at all. Isn’t he a temple, then; the visible representation and embodiment of the divine? And yet, unfortunately, such indiscriminate bowing doesn’t help. For there is a Devil within man, just as there is a Divine; and too often, the bow is simply taken by the former. It would go into the pocket of Vanity (which is the clearest expression of the Devil these days); therefore, we must withhold it.
‘The gladder am I, on the other hand, to do reverence to those Shells and outer Husks of the Body, wherein no devilish passion any longer lodges, but only the pure emblem and effigies of Man: I mean, to Empty, or even to Cast Clothes. Nay, is it not to Clothes that most men do reverence: to the fine frogged broadcloth, nowise to the “straddling animal with bandy legs” which it holds, and makes a Dignitary of? Who ever saw any Lord my-lorded in tattered blanket fastened with wooden skewer? Nevertheless, I say, there is in such worship a shade of hypocrisy, a practical deception: for how often does the Body appropriate what was meant for the Cloth only! Whoso would avoid falsehood, which is the essence of all Sin, will perhaps see good to take a different course. That reverence which cannot act without obstruction and perversion when the Clothes are full, may have free course when they are empty. Even as, for Hindoo Worshippers, the Pagoda is not less sacred than the God; so do I too worship the hollow cloth Garment with equal fervour, as when it 181contained the Man: nay, with more, for I now fear no deception, of myself or of others.
‘I’m even happier to pay my respects to those shells and outer layers of the body, where no wicked passion resides anymore, but only the pure symbol and likeness of humanity. I mean, to the Empty, or even to Cast Clothes. Isn’t it true that most people revere Clothes: the fine frogged broadcloth, not the “straddling animal with bandy legs” that it supports and elevates? Who has ever seen a Lord, flattered in a tattered blanket held together with a wooden skewer? Still, I believe there is a hint of hypocrisy in such worship, a kind of practical deception: for how often does the Body take on what was meant solely for the Cloth! Anyone who wishes to avoid falsehood, which is the root of all Sin, might find it wise to choose a different path. That reverence which struggles with obstruction and distortion when the Clothes are full may flow freely when they are empty. Just as for Hindu worshippers, the Pagoda is just as sacred as the God; I too worship the hollow cloth Garment with the same passion, as when it 181contained the Man: in fact, even more so, because now I fear no deception, from myself or others.
‘Did not King Toomtabard, or, in other words, John Baliol, reign long over Scotland; the man John Baliol being quite gone, and only the “Toom Tabard” (Empty Gown) remaining? What still dignity dwells in a suit of Cast Clothes! How meekly it bears its honours! No haughty looks, no scornful gesture: silent and serene, it fronts the world; neither demanding worship, nor afraid to miss it. The Hat still carries the physiognomy of its Head: but the vanity and the stupidity, and goose-speech which was the sign of these two, are gone. The Coat-arm is stretched out, but not to strike; the Breeches, in modest simplicity, depend at ease, and now at last have a graceful flow; the Waistcoat hides no evil passion, no riotous desire; hunger or thirst now dwells not in it. Thus all is purged from the grossness of sense, from the carking cares and foul vices of the World; and rides there, on its Clothes-horse; as, on a Pegasus, might some skyey Messenger, or purified Apparition, visiting our low Earth.
‘Did King Toomtabard, or John Baliol, really rule over Scotland for long? The man John Baliol is completely gone, and only the “Toom Tabard” (Empty Gown) remains. What dignity is left in an old suit! It carries its honors so humbly! No arrogant looks, no scornful gestures: silent and calm, it stands against the world; neither demanding admiration nor worried about lacking it. The Hat still resembles its Owner, but the vanity, ignorance, and foolish talk that defined them have vanished. The Coat's arm is extended, but not to strike; the Breeches hang down simply and gracefully now. The Waistcoat hides no bad desires or chaotic cravings; it holds no hunger or thirst. Thus, it is all cleansed of the impurities of the senses, of the nagging worries and vile vices of the World; and it stands there, on its Clothes-horse, like a sky messenger or a purified spirit visiting our earthly realm.
‘Often, while I sojourned in that monstrous tuberosity of Civilised Life, the Capital of England; and meditated, and questioned Destiny, under that ink-sea of vapour, black, thick, and multifarious as Spartan broth; and was one lone soul amid those grinding millions;—often have I turned into their Old-Clothes Market to worship. With awe-struck heart I walk through that Monmouth Street, with its empty Suits, as through a Sanhedrim of stainless Ghosts. Silent are they, but expressive in their silence: the past witnesses and instruments of Woe and Joy, of Passions, Virtues, Crimes, and all the fathomless tumult of Good and Evil in “the Prison men call Life.” Friends! trust not the heart of that man for whom Old Clothes are not venerable. Watch, too, with reverence, that bearded Jewish High-priest, who with hoarse voice, like some Angel of Doom, summons them from the four winds! On his head, like the Pope, he has three Hats,—a real triple tiara; on either hand are the similitude of wings, whereon the summoned Garments come to alight; and ever, as he slowly cleaves the air, sounds forth his deep 182fateful note, as if through a trumpet he were proclaiming: “Ghosts of Life, come to Judgment!” Reck not, ye fluttering Ghosts: he will purify you in his Purgatory, with fire and with water; and, one day, new-created ye shall reappear. O, let him in whom the flame of Devotion is ready to go out, who has never worshipped, and knows not what to worship, pace and repace, with austerest thought, the pavement of Monmouth Street, and say whether his heart and his eyes still continue dry. If Field Lane, with its long fluttering rows of yellow handkerchiefs, be a Dionysius’ Ear, where, in stifled jarring hubbub, we hear the Indictment which Poverty and Vice bring against lazy Wealth, that it has left them there cast-out and trodden under foot of Want, Darkness and the Devil,—then is Monmouth Street a Mirza’s Hill, where, in motley vision, the whole Pageant of Existence passes awfully before us; with its wail and jubilee, mad loves and mad hatreds, church-bells and gallows-ropes, farce-tragedy, beast-godhood,—the Bedlam of Creation!’
‘Often, while I hung out in that huge, chaotic place of Civilized Life, the Capital of England; and thought deeply, and questioned Destiny, under that thick, dark cloud of smoke, as varied as Spartan broth; and was just one lonely person among those grinding millions;—I’ve often wandered into their Old-Clothes Market to pay my respects. With a heart full of awe, I walk through Monmouth Street, filled with empty suits, as if I’m walking through a gathering of pure Spirits. They are silent but tell so much in their silence: witnesses and symbols of Suffering and Joy, of Passions, Virtues, Crimes, and all the endless whirlwind of Good and Evil in “the Prison men call Life.” Friends! don’t trust the heart of anyone who doesn’t find Old Clothes sacred. Also, watch with respect that bearded Jewish High Priest, who, with a hoarse voice, like some Angel of Doom, calls them from all directions! On his head, like the Pope, he wears three hats—a real triple tiara; on each side are what look like wings, where the summoned Clothes come to rest; and as he slowly moves through the air, he proclaims with a deep, fateful note, as if through a trumpet: “Ghosts of Life, come to Judgment!” Don’t worry, you fluttering Ghosts: he will cleanse you in his Purgatory, with fire and water; and one day, you will reappear anew. Oh, let anyone whose flame of Devotion is about to fade, who has never worshipped, and doesn’t know what to worship, walk back and forth with serious thought on the pavement of Monmouth Street, and see if his heart and eyes remain dry. If Field Lane, with its long fluttering rows of yellow handkerchiefs, is a Dionysius’ Ear, where, in a stifled, jarring noise, we hear the Charges that Poverty and Vice bring against lazy Wealth, that it has left them discarded and trampled by Want, Darkness, and the Devil,—then Monmouth Street is a Mirza’s Hill, where, in a colorful vision, the entire Pageant of Existence frighteningly passes before us; with its cries and celebrations, crazy loves and crazy hatreds, church bells and gallows ropes, comedy-tragedy, beast-godhood—the Bedlam of Creation!’
To most men, as it does to ourselves, all this will seem overcharged. We too have walked through Monmouth Street; but with little feeling of ‘Devotion’: probably in part because the contemplative process is so fatally broken in upon by the brood of money-changers who nestle in that Church, and importune the worshipper with merely secular proposals. Whereas Teufelsdröckh might be in that happy middle state, which leaves to the Clothes-broker no hope either of sale or of purchase, and so be allowed to linger there without molestation.—Something we would have given to see the little philosophical figure, with its steeple-hat and loose flowing skirts, and eyes in a fine frenzy, ‘pacing and repacing in austerest thought’ that foolish Street; which to him was a true Delphic avenue, and supernatural Whispering-gallery, where the ‘Ghosts of Life’ rounded strange secrets in his ear. O thou philosophic Teufelsdröckh, that listenest while others only gabble, and with thy quick tympanum hearest the grass grow!
To most people, just like us, all this might seem exaggerated. We’ve walked through Monmouth Street too, but we felt little sense of ‘Devotion’: probably partly because that quiet moment is so rudely interrupted by the crowd of money-changers that hang around that Church, bothering worshippers with purely worldly offers. Meanwhile, Teufelsdröckh might be in that blissful state where the Clothes-broker has no chance of selling or buying, allowing him to stay there undisturbed. We would have given a lot to see that little philosophical figure, with its tall hat and loose flowing clothes, eyes lost in deep thought, ‘pacing and repacing in serious contemplation’ that silly Street; which to him was a genuine Delphic pathway, a supernatural Whispering-gallery where the ‘Ghosts of Life’ whispered strange secrets in his ear. Oh, you philosophical Teufelsdröckh, who listens while others just chatter, and with your keen senses hear the grass grow!
At the same time, is it not strange that, in Paper-bag 183Documents destined for an English work, there exists nothing like an authentic diary of this his sojourn in London; and of his Meditations among the Clothes-shops only the obscurest emblematic shadows? Neither, in conversation (for, indeed, he was not a man to pester you with his Travels), have we heard him more than allude to the subject.
At the same time, isn't it odd that, in Paper-bag 183Documents meant for an English publication, there is no real diary of his time in London; and regarding his Thoughts in the Clothing Stores, we have only the faintest symbolic hints? Also, in conversation (because he wasn't the type to overwhelm you with stories about his travels), we rarely heard him mention it at all.
For the rest, however, it cannot be uninteresting that we here find how early the significance of Clothes had dawned on the now so distinguished Clothes-Professor. Might we but fancy it to have been even in Monmouth Street, at the bottom of our own English ‘ink-sea,’ that this remarkable Volume first took being, and shot forth its salient point in his soul,—as in Chaos did the Egg of Eros, one day to be hatched into a Universe!
For the rest, it’s interesting to see how early the importance of clothes became clear to the now well-known clothing expert. Just imagine if this remarkable book was created in Monmouth Street, at the edge of our own English 'ink-sea,’ where its main idea first sparked in his mind—like the Egg of Eros emerging from Chaos, destined to hatch into a Universe!
CHAPTER VII
Chapter 7
ORGANIC FILAMENTS
For us, who happen to live while the World-Phœnix is burning herself, and burning so slowly that, as Teufelsdröckh calculates, it were a handsome bargain would she engage to have done ‘within two centuries,’ there seems to lie but an ashy prospect. Not altogether so, however, does the Professor figure it. ‘In the living subject,’ says he, ‘change is wont to be gradual: thus, while the serpent sheds its old skin, the new is already formed beneath. Little knowest thou of the burning of a World-Phœnix, who fanciest that she must first burn-out, and lie as a dead cinereous heap; and therefrom the young one start-up by miracle, and fly heavenward. Far otherwise! In that Fire-whirlwind, Creation and Destruction proceed together; ever as the ashes of the Old are blown about, do organic filaments of the New mysteriously spin themselves: and amid the rushing and the waving of the Whirlwind-Element come tones of a melodious Deathsong, which end not but in tones of a more melodious Birthsong. Nay, look into the Fire-whirlwind with thy own eyes, 184and thou wilt see.’ Let us actually look, then: to poor individuals, who cannot expect to live two centuries, those same organic filaments, mysteriously spinning themselves, will be the best part of the spectacle. First, therefore, this of Mankind in general:
For us, who happen to be living while the World-Phoenix is burning herself, and doing so slowly enough that, as Teufelsdröckh figures, it would be quite a deal if she promised to be done 'within two centuries,' there seems to be only an ashy future ahead. However, the Professor doesn't quite see it that way. 'In a living being,' he says, 'change tends to happen gradually: so while the serpent sheds its old skin, the new one is already forming underneath. You know little about the burning of a World-Phoenix if you think she must first burn away completely and lie as a dead ash pile; and from that, the new one miraculously emerges and soars upward. It's quite different! In that Fire-whirlwind, Creation and Destruction happen together; as the ashes of the Old are blown away, the organic threads of the New mysteriously spin themselves: and amidst the rushing and swirling of the Whirlwind-Element come the sounds of a beautiful Deathsong, which only end in a more beautiful Birthsong. No, look into the Fire-whirlwind with your own eyes, 184 and you'll see.' So let’s actually take a look: for those poor individuals who can’t expect to live two centuries, those same organic threads, mysteriously spinning themselves, will be the most captivating part of the show. First, then, let’s consider Mankind in general:
‘In vain thou deniest it,’ says the Professor; ‘thou art my Brother. Thy very Hatred, thy very Envy, those foolish lies thou tellest of me in thy splenetic humour: what is all this but an inverted Sympathy? Were I a Steam-engine, wouldst thou take the trouble to tell lies of me? Not thou! I should grind all unheeded, whether badly or well.
‘You can deny it all you want,’ says the Professor; ‘you are my brother. Your very hatred, your envy, those silly lies you spread about me out of your bad mood: what is all that but a twisted kind of sympathy? If I were a steam engine, would you bother to lie about me? No, you wouldn’t! I’d just keep grinding away, regardless of whether it was good or bad.’
‘Wondrous truly are the bonds that unite us one and all; whether by the soft binding of Love, or the iron chaining of Necessity, as we like to choose it. More than once have I said to myself, of some perhaps whimsically strutting Figure, such as provokes whimsical thoughts: “Wert thou, my little Brotherkin, suddenly covered-up within the largest imaginable Glass-bell,—what a thing it were, not for thyself only, but for the world! Post Letters, more or fewer, from all the four winds, impinge against thy Glass walls, but have to drop unread: neither from within comes there question or response into any Postbag; thy Thoughts fall into no friendly ear or heart, thy Manufacture into no purchasing hand: thou art no longer a circulating venous-arterial Heart, that, taking and giving, circulatest through all Space and all Time: there has a Hole fallen-out in the immeasurable, universal World-tissue, which must be darned-up again!”
‘It’s truly amazing how the bonds that connect us all work; whether through the gentle ties of Love or the harsh chains of Necessity, as we often prefer it. More than once, I've thought to myself about some perhaps absurdly confident person, someone who sparks quirky thoughts: “If you, my little Brotherkin, were suddenly sealed inside the largest imaginable glass dome—what a situation it would be, not just for you, but for the whole world! Letters, more or fewer, coming from all directions, would hit your glass walls but would have to remain unread: no questions or responses would come into any mailbox; your thoughts wouldn’t reach any kind ears or warm hearts, and your creations wouldn’t find any buyers: you would no longer be a circulating heart, taking and giving, moving throughout all Space and Time: a gap has opened in the vast, universal fabric of the world, which must be mended again!”’
‘Such venous-arterial circulation, of Letters, verbal Messages, paper and other Packages, going out from him and coming in, are a blood-circulation, visible to the eye: but the finer nervous circulation, by which all things, the minutest that he does, minutely influence all men, and the very look of his face blesses or curses whomso it lights on, and so generates ever new blessing or new cursing: all this you cannot see, but only imagine. I say, there is not a red Indian, hunting by Lake Winnipic, can quarrel with his squaw, but the whole world must smart for it: will not the price of beaver rise? It is a mathematical fact that the casting 185of this pebble from my hand alters the centre of gravity of the Universe.
‘The flow of letters, spoken messages, paperwork, and other packages going out from him and coming in is like a visible blood circulation. However, the finer, invisible circulation of thoughts and actions influences everyone—every little thing he does affects others, and even the expression on his face can bring blessings or curses to anyone it touches, creating new blessings or curses in turn. You can’t see this, only imagine it. I say, there isn’t a Native American hunting by Lake Winnipeg who can argue with his partner without the whole world feeling the impact: doesn’t that mean the price of beaver will go up? It’s a mathematical fact that throwing this pebble from my hand changes the center of gravity of the Universe.’
‘If now an existing generation of men stand so woven together, not less indissolubly does generation with generation. Hast thou ever meditated on that word, Tradition: how we inherit not Life only, but all the garniture and form of Life; and work, and speak, and even think and feel, as our Fathers, and primeval grandfathers, from the beginning, have given it us?—Who printed thee, for example, this unpretending Volume on the Philosophy of Clothes? Not the Herren Stillschweigen and Company; but Cadmus of Thebes, Faust of Mentz, and innumerable others whom thou knowest not. Had there been no Mœsogothic Ulfila, there had been no English Shakspeare, or a different one. Simpleton! it was Tubalcain that made thy very Tailor’s needle, and sewed that court-suit of thine.
‘If an existing generation of people is so closely connected, then generations also remain interconnected. Have you ever thought about that word, Tradition: how we inherit not just Life, but all the nuances and forms of Life; and how we work, speak, think, and even feel, just like our Fathers and ancient grandfathers have taught us from the beginning?—Who printed this humble book on the Philosophy of Clothes for you? Not Herren Stillschweigen and Company; but Cadmus of Thebes, Faust of Mentz, and countless others you don’t even know. If there hadn’t been a Mœsogothic Ulfila, there would be no English Shakespeare, or perhaps a completely different one. Fool! It was Tubalcain who made your very Tailor’s needle and crafted that suit you wear.’
‘Yes, truly; if Nature is one, and a living indivisible whole, much more is Mankind, the Image that reflects and creates Nature, without which Nature were not. As palpable life-streams in that wondrous Individual Mankind, among so many life-streams that are not palpable, flow on those main-currents of what we call Opinion; as preserved in Institutions, Polities, Churches, above all in Books. Beautiful it is to understand and know that a Thought did never yet die; that as thou, the originator thereof, hast gathered it and created it from the whole Past, so thou wilt transmit it to the whole Future. It is thus that the heroic heart, the seeing eye of the first times, still feels and sees in us of the latest; that the Wise Man stands ever encompassed, and spiritually embraced, by a cloud of witnesses and brothers; and there is a living, literal Communion of Saints, wide as the World itself, and as the History of the World.
‘Yes, truly; if Nature is one, and a living indivisible whole, then Mankind is even more so, as it reflects and creates Nature, without which Nature wouldn't exist. As tangible life streams within the remarkable whole of Mankind, among so many intangible life streams, flow along the main currents of what we call Opinion; as preserved in Institutions, Governments, Churches, and especially in Books. It is beautiful to understand and know that a Thought has never truly died; just as you, the originator, have gathered and created it from the entire Past, so you will pass it on to the entire Future. This is how the heroic heart and the insightful vision of the earliest times still resonate in us today; how the Wise Man is always surrounded and spiritually embraced by a community of witnesses and brothers; and there is a living, literal Communion of Saints, as vast as the world itself and as rich as the History of the World.
‘Noteworthy also, and serviceable for the progress of this same Individual, wilt thou find his subdivision into Generations. Generations are as the Days of toilsome Mankind: Death and Birth are the vesper and the matin bells, that summon Mankind to sleep, and to rise refreshed for new advancement. What the Father has made, the Son can make and enjoy; but has also work 186of his own appointed him. Thus all things wax, and roll onwards; Arts, Establishments, Opinions, nothing is completed, but ever completing. Newton has learned to see what Kepler saw; but there is also a fresh heaven-derived force in Newton; he must mount to still higher points of vision. So too the Hebrew Lawgiver is, in due time, followed by an Apostle of the Gentiles. In the business of Destruction, as this also is from time to time a necessary work, thou findest a like sequence and perseverance: for Luther it was as yet hot enough to stand by that burning of the Pope’s Bull; Voltaire could not warm himself at the glimmering ashes, but required quite other fuel. Thus likewise, I note, the English Whig has, in the second generation, become an English Radical; who, in the third again, it is to be hoped, will become an English Rebuilder. Find Mankind where thou wilt, thou findest it in living movement, in progress faster or slower: the Phœnix soars aloft, hovers with outstretched wings, filling Earth with her music; or, as now, she sinks, and with spheral swan-song immolates herself in flame, that she may soar the higher and sing the clearer.’
‘Notably, and beneficial for the growth of this same Individual, you will find his division into Generations. Generations are like the Days of hardworking Humanity: Birth and Death are the evening and morning bells that call Humanity to sleep and then wake up refreshed for new progress. What the Father has created, the Son can create and enjoy; but he also has his own duties assigned to him. Thus all things grow and move forward; Arts, Institutions, Ideas—nothing is final but always in the process of becoming. Newton has learned to see what Kepler saw; yet there is also a new, heaven-sent force in Newton; he must reach even higher viewpoints. Similarly, the Hebrew Lawgiver is, in due course, succeeded by an Apostle to the Gentiles. In the realm of Destruction, which is occasionally a necessary task, you find the same sequence and persistence: Luther was still passionate enough to support the burning of the Pope’s Bull; Voltaire could not warm himself by its fading ashes but needed entirely different fuel. Likewise, I observe that the English Whig has, in the second generation, transformed into an English Radical; who, in the third, we hope will evolve into an English Rebuilder. Wherever you find Humanity, you see it in active movement, progressing at varying speeds: the Phoenix soars high, gliding with outstretched wings, filling the Earth with her music; or, as now, she descends, and with a spherical swan song, sacrifices herself in flames, so she may rise higher and sing more clearly.’
Let the friends of social order, in such a disastrous period, lay this to heart, and derive from it any little comfort they can. We subjoin another passage, concerning Titles:
Let the friends of social order, during such a disastrous time, take this to heart and find any small comfort they can. We’ll add another passage about Titles:
‘Remark, not without surprise,’ says Teufelsdröckh, ‘how all high Titles of Honour come hitherto from fighting. Your Herzog (Duke, Dux) is Leader of Armies; your Earl (Jarl) is Strong Man; your Marshal cavalry Horse-shoer. A Millennium, or reign of Peace and Wisdom, having from of old been prophesied, and becoming now daily more and more indubitable, may it not be apprehended that such Fighting-titles will cease to be palatable, and new and higher need to be devised?
‘Notice, not without surprise,’ says Teufelsdröckh, ‘how all high titles of honor have come from fighting. Your Herzog (Duke, Dux) is the leader of armies; your Earl (Jarl) is the strong man; your Marshal is the cavalry horse-shoer. A Millennium, or era of peace and wisdom, has been prophesied for a long time, and it is becoming more and more certain every day. Should we not consider that such fighting titles may stop being appealing, and that new and greater ones will need to be created?’
‘The only Title wherein I, with confidence, trace eternity, is that of King. König (King), anciently Könning, means Ken-ning (Cunning), or which is the same thing, Can-ning. Ever must the Sovereign of Mankind be fitly entitled King.’
‘The only title where I can confidently connect to eternity is that of King. König (King), originally Könning, means Ken-ning (Cunning), or, in other words, Can-ning. The ruler of humanity must always be appropriately called King.’
‘Well, also,’ says he elsewhere, ‘was it written by Theologians: a King rules by divine right. He carries 187in him an authority from God, or man will never give it him. Can I choose my own King? I can choose my own King Popinjay, and play what farce or tragedy I may with him: but he who is to be my Ruler, whose will is to be higher than my will, was chosen for me in Heaven. Neither except in such Obedience to the Heaven-chosen is Freedom so much as conceivable.’
‘Well, also,’ he says elsewhere, ‘was it written by Theologians: a King rules by divine right. He carries 187in him an authority from God, or man will never give it to him. Can I choose my own King? I can pick my own King Popinjay and put on whatever farce or tragedy I want with him: but he who is to be my Ruler, whose will is to be higher than my will, was chosen for me in Heaven. Only in such obedience to the Heaven-chosen is freedom even conceivable.’
The Editor will here admit that, among all the wondrous provinces of Teufelsdröckh’s spiritual world, there is none he walks in with such astonishment, hesitation, and even pain, as in the Political. How, with our English love of Ministry and Opposition, and that generous conflict of Parties, mind warming itself against mind in their mutual wrestle for the Public Good, by which wrestle, indeed, is our invaluable Constitution kept warm and alive; how shall we domesticate ourselves in this spectral Necropolis, or rather City both of the Dead and of the Unborn, where the Present seems little other than an inconsiderable Film dividing the Past and the Future? In those dim longdrawn expanses, all is so immeasurable; much so disastrous, ghastly; your very radiances and straggling light-beams have a supernatural character. And then with such an indifference, such a prophetic peacefulness (accounting the inevitably coming as already here, to him all one whether it be distant by centuries or only by days), does he sit;—and live, you would say, rather in any other age than in his own! It is our painful duty to announce, or repeat, that, looking into this man, we discern a deep, silent, slow-burning, inextinguishable Radicalism, such as fills us with shuddering admiration.
The Editor will admit that, among all the fascinating areas of Teufelsdröckh’s spiritual world, there is none he navigates with such astonishment, hesitation, and even pain, as in the Political. How, with our British fondness for Government and Opposition, and that noble struggle of Parties—minds battling against each other for the Public Good, which indeed keeps our invaluable Constitution warm and alive—are we supposed to settle in this ghostly Necropolis, or rather City of both the Dead and the Unborn, where the Present seems almost nothing more than a thin Film separating the Past from the Future? In those dim, vast stretches, everything feels so immeasurable; much is disastrous and ghastly;
Thus, for example, he appears to make little even of the Elective Franchise; at least so we interpret the following: ‘Satisfy yourselves,’ he says, ‘by universal, indubitable experiment, even as ye are now doing or will do, whether Freedom, heavenborn and leading heavenward, and so vitally essential for us all, cannot peradventure be mechanically hatched and brought to light in that same Ballot-Box of yours; or at worst, in some other discoverable or devisable Box, Edifice, or Steam-mechanism. It were a mighty convenience; 188and beyond all feats of manufacture witnessed hitherto.’ Is Teufelsdröckh acquainted with the British Constitution, even slightly?—He says, under another figure: ‘But after all, were the problem, as indeed it now everywhere is, To rebuild your old House from the top downwards (since you must live in it the while), what better, what other, than the Representative Machine will serve your turn? Meanwhile, however, mock me not with the name of Free, “when you have but knit-up my chains into ornamental festoons.”’—Or what will any member of the Peace Society make of such an assertion as this: ‘The lower people everywhere desire War. Not so unwisely; there is then a demand for lower people—to be shot!’
Thus, for example, he seems to downplay the importance of the Elective Franchise; at least that's how we interpret the following: ‘Satisfy yourselves,’ he says, ‘through universal, unquestionable experiment, just as you are now doing or will do, whether Liberty, which is born of heaven and leads to heaven, and is so essential for all of us, can possibly be mechanically created and revealed in that same Ballot-Box of yours; or, at worst, in some other discoverable or thinkable Box, Building, or Steam-machine. It would be a great convenience; 188 beyond all manufacturing feats witnessed so far.’ Is Teufelsdröckh even slightly familiar with the British Constitution?—He states, using another analogy: ‘But after all, if the problem, as it is everywhere now, is to rebuild your old House from the top downwards (since you must live in it all the while), what better, what other, than the Representative Machine will meet your needs? Meanwhile, however, don’t mock me with the name of Free, “when you have merely turned my chains into decorative garlands.”’—Or what would any member of the Peace Society think of such a statement as this: ‘The lower classes everywhere want War. Not so foolishly; there is then a need for lower people—to be shot!’
Gladly, therefore, do we emerge from those soul-confusing labyrinths of speculative Radicalism, into somewhat clearer regions. Here, looking round, as was our hest, for ‘organic filaments,’ we ask, may not this, touching ‘Hero-worship,’ be of the number? It seems of a cheerful character; yet so quaint, so mystical, one knows not what, or how little, may lie under it. Our readers shall look with their own eyes:
Gladly, then, we step away from those confusing twists of speculative Radicalism and move into somewhat clearer territory. Here, as we intended, we look around for 'organic connections' and ask if this, regarding 'Hero-worship,' might be one of them. It seems to have a positive vibe; yet it's so unusual and mystical that it's hard to tell what, or how little, might be beneath the surface. Our readers can see for themselves:
‘True is it that, in these days, man can do almost all things, only not obey. True likewise that whoso cannot obey cannot be free, still less bear rule; he that is the inferior of nothing, can be the superior of nothing, the equal of nothing. Nevertheless, believe not that man has lost his faculty of Reverence; that if it slumber in him, it has gone dead. Painful for man is that same rebellious Independence, when it has become inevitable; only in loving companionship with his fellows does he feel safe; only in reverently bowing down before the Higher does he feel himself exalted.
‘It’s true that nowadays, people can do almost anything, except obey. It’s also true that those who cannot obey cannot be free, let alone in charge; someone who isn’t inferior to anything can’t be superior to anything or equal to anything. However, don’t believe that humanity has lost its ability to show Reverence; if it seems dormant, it hasn’t died. That rebellious Independence can be painful for people when it becomes inevitable; only in loving relationships with others do they feel secure; only when they humbly bow to a Higher power do they feel uplifted.'
‘Or what if the character of our so troublous Era lay even in this: that man had forever cast away Fear, which is the lower; but not yet risen into perennial Reverence, which is the higher and highest?
‘Or what if the nature of our troubled times lies even in this: that humanity has permanently discarded Fear, which is the lower; but hasn't yet ascended to lasting Reverence, which is the higher and highest?
‘Meanwhile, observe with joy, so cunningly has Nature ordered it, that whatsoever man ought to obey, he cannot but obey. Before no faintest revelation of the Godlike did he ever stand irreverent; least of all, when the Godlike showed itself revealed in his fellow-man. 189Thus is there a true religious Loyalty forever rooted in his heart; nay in all ages, even in ours, it manifests itself as a more or less orthodox Hero-worship. In which fact, that Hero-worship exists, has existed, and will forever exist, universally among Mankind, mayest thou discern the corner-stone of living-rock, whereon all Polities for the remotest time may stand secure.’
‘Meanwhile, observe with joy, so skillfully has Nature arranged it, that whatever man should obey, he cannot help but obey. He never stands irreverent before any faintest hint of the Godlike; least of all, when the Godlike reveals itself in his fellow man. 189Thus, there is a true religious Loyalty forever rooted in his heart; indeed, in all ages, even in ours, it shows itself as a more or less traditional Hero-worship. In this fact, that Hero-worship exists, has existed, and will always exist, universally among humankind, you may discern the cornerstone of solid ground, whereon all societies for the distant future may stand secure.’
Do our readers discern any such corner-stone, or even so much as what Teufelsdröckh is looking at? He exclaims, ‘Or hast thou forgotten Paris and Voltaire? How the aged, withered man, though but a Sceptic, Mocker, and millinery Court-poet, yet because even he seemed the Wisest, Best, could drag mankind at his chariot-wheels, so that princes coveted a smile from him, and the loveliest of France would have laid their hair beneath his feet! All Paris was one vast Temple of Hero-worship; though their Divinity, moreover, was of feature too apish.
Do our readers recognize any such foundation, or even what Teufelsdröckh is focused on? He exclaims, ‘Or have you forgotten Paris and Voltaire? How the old, frail man, despite being just a skeptic, mocker, and fashion poet, still managed to appear the Wisest, the Best, could pull humanity along behind him, so that princes longed for his smile, and the most beautiful in France would have laid their hair at his feet! All of Paris was one huge Temple of Hero-worship; although their Deity was rather monkey-like in appearance.'
‘But if such things,’ continues he, ‘were done in the dry tree, what will be done in the green? If, in the most parched season of Man’s History, in the most parched spot of Europe, when Parisian life was at best but a scientific Hortus Siccus, bedizened with some Italian Gumflowers, such virtue could come out of it; what is to be looked for when Life again waves leafy and bloomy, and your Hero-Divinity shall have nothing apelike, but be wholly human? Know that there is in man a quite indestructible Reverence for whatsoever holds of Heaven, or even plausibly counterfeits such holding. Show the dullest clodpole, show the haughtiest featherhead, that a soul higher than himself is actually here; were his knees stiffened into brass, he must down and worship.’
‘But if such things,’ he continues, ‘were done to the dry tree, what will happen to the green one? If, in the driest season of human history, in the most barren spot of Europe, when life in Paris was just a scientific Hortus Siccus, adorned with a few Italian gumflowers, such virtue could emerge; what can we expect when life once again flourishes with leaves and blossoms, and your Hero-Divinity embodies nothing apelike, but is entirely human? Understand that within man there exists an indestructible reverence for anything that connects to Heaven, or even convincingly mimics such a connection. Show even the dullest person, show the most arrogant individual, that a soul greater than theirs is actually present; even if his knees were made of brass, he would have to kneel and worship.’
Organic filaments, of a more authentic sort, mysteriously spinning themselves, some will perhaps discover in the following passage:
Organic filaments, of a more genuine kind, mysteriously spinning themselves, some may perhaps find in the following passage:
‘There is no Church, sayest thou? The voice of Prophecy has gone dumb? This is even what I dispute: but in any case, hast thou not still Preaching enough? A Preaching Friar settles himself in every village; and builds a pulpit, which he calls Newspaper. 190Therefrom he preaches what most momentous doctrine is in him, for man’s salvation; and dost not thou listen, and believe? Look well, thou seest everywhere a new Clergy of the Mendicant Orders, some bare-footed, some almost bare-backed, fashion itself into shape, and teach and preach, zealously enough, for copper alms and the love of God. These break in pieces the ancient idols; and, though themselves too often reprobate, as idol-breakers are wont to be, mark out the sites of new Churches, where the true God-ordained, that are to follow, may find audience, and minister. Said I not, Before the old skin was shed, the new had formed itself beneath it?’
‘You say there’s no Church? The voice of Prophecy is silent? That’s exactly what I’m arguing against; but either way, don’t you still have plenty of preaching? A preaching friar sets up shop in every village and builds a pulpit, which he calls a Newspaper. 190 From there, he shares what he thinks is the most important doctrine for saving souls, and don’t you listen and believe? Look closely; you can see a new clergy from the Mendicant Orders everywhere, some barefoot, some nearly naked, taking shape and teaching and preaching eagerly for a few coins and the love of God. They’re breaking apart the old idols; and while they’re often corrupt themselves, like idol-breakers usually are, they’re paving the way for new Churches, where those truly ordained by God can find an audience and minister. Didn’t I say, before the old skin was shed, the new one had already formed beneath it?’
Perhaps also in the following; wherewith we now hasten to knit-up this ravelled sleeve:
Perhaps also in the following; with which we now hurry to mend this tangled sleeve:
‘But there is no Religion?’ reiterates the Professor. ‘Fool! I tell thee, there is. Hast thou well considered all that lies in this immeasurable froth-ocean we name Literature? Fragments of a genuine Church-Homiletic lie scattered there, which Time will assort: nay fractions even of a Liturgy could I point out. And knowest thou no Prophet, even in the vesture, environment, and dialect of this age? None to whom the God-like had revealed itself, through all meanest and highest forms of the Common; and by him been again prophetically revealed: in whose inspired melody, even in these rag-gathering and rag-burning days, Man’s Life again begins, were it but afar off, to be divine? Knowest thou none such? I know him, and name him—Goethe.
"But there is no religion?" the Professor repeats. "Fool! I tell you, there is. Have you really thought about all that exists in this vast ocean of frothy material we call Literature? Fragments of a real Church-Homiletic are scattered throughout, which Time will sort out: I could even point out bits of a Liturgy. And do you not know of any Prophet, even in the style, setting, and language of this age? None to whom the divine has revealed itself through all the simplest and grandest aspects of the Common, and who has then revealed it again in a prophetic way? In whose inspired words, even in these times of collecting rags and burning them, Humanity's Life once again starts, even if from a distance, to become divine? Do you know of anyone like that? I do, and I name him—Goethe."
‘But thou as yet standest in no Temple; joinest in no Psalm-worship; feelest well that, where there is no ministering Priest, the people perish? Be of comfort! Thou art not alone, if thou have Faith. Spake we not of a Communion of Saints, unseen, yet not unreal, accompanying and brother-like embracing thee, so thou be worthy? Their heroic Sufferings rise up melodiously together to Heaven, out of all lands, and out of all times, as a sacred Miserere; their heroic Actions also, as a boundless everlasting Psalm of Triumph. Neither say that thou hast now no Symbol of the Godlike. Is not God’s Universe a Symbol of the Godlike; is not Immensity a Temple; is not Man’s History, and Men’s 191History, a perpetual Evangel? Listen, and for organ-music thou wilt ever, as of old, hear the Morning Stars sing together.’
'But you still don't stand in any Temple; you're not joining in any Psalm-worship; you know well that where there is no ministering Priest, the people perish? Take comfort! You're not alone if you have Faith. Didn't we talk about a Communion of Saints, unseen yet not unreal, surrounding and brother-like embracing you, as long as you're worthy? Their heroic sufferings rise melodiously together to Heaven, from all lands and all times, as a sacred Miserere; their heroic actions also, as a boundless everlasting Psalm of Triumph. Don't say that you have no symbol of the Godlike right now. Isn't God's Universe a symbol of the Godlike? Isn't Immensity a Temple? Isn't Man's history, and Men's 191 history, a perpetual Evangel? Listen, and instead of organ music, you will always, just like before, hear the Morning Stars sing together.'
CHAPTER VIII
CHAPTER 8
NATURAL SUPERNATURALISM
It is in his stupendous Section, headed Natural Supernaturalism, that the Professor first becomes a Seer; and, after long effort, such as we have witnessed, finally subdues under his feet this refractory Clothes-Philosophy, and takes victorious possession thereof. Phantasms enough he has had to struggle with; ‘Cloth-webs and Cob-webs,’ of Imperial Mantles, Superannuated Symbols, and what not: yet still did he courageously pierce through. Nay, worst of all, two quite mysterious, world-embracing Phantasms, Time and Space, have ever hovered round him, perplexing and bewildering: but with these also he now resolutely grapples, these also he victoriously rends asunder. In a word, he has looked fixedly on Existence, till, one after the other, its earthly hulls and garnitures have all melted away; and now, to his rapt vision, the interior celestial Holy of Holies lies disclosed.
It is in his amazing Section, titled Natural Supernaturalism, that the Professor first becomes a Seer; and, after a long struggle, like what we've seen, finally overcomes this stubborn Clothes-Philosophy, and takes victorious control of it. He's faced plenty of phantoms; ‘Cloth-webs and Cob-webs,’ of Imperial Mantles, outdated Symbols, and whatnot: yet he still bravely pushed through. Even worse, two entirely mysterious, all-encompassing Phantoms, Time and Outer space, have always surrounded him, confusing and bewildering him: but with these too, he now bravely wrestles, and he victoriously tears them apart. In short, he has stared intently at Existence until, one after another, its earthly shells and decorations have all dissolved; and now, to his captivated vision, the inner celestial Holy of Holies is revealed.
Here, therefore, properly it is that the Philosophy of Clothes attains to Transcendentalism; this last leap, can we but clear it, takes us safe into the promised land, where Palingenesia, in all senses, may be considered as beginning. ‘Courage, then!’ may our Diogenes exclaim, with better right than Diogenes the First once did. This stupendous Section we, after long painful meditation, have found not to be unintelligible; but, on the contrary, to grow clear, nay radiant, and all-illuminating. Let the reader, turning on it what utmost force of speculative intellect is in him, do his part; as we, by judicious selection and adjustment, shall study to do ours:
Here, it’s fitting that the Philosophy of Clothes reaches Transcendentalism; if we can just make that final leap, we’ll safely enter the promised land, where Palingenesia, in every sense, can be seen as beginning. “Courage, then!” our Diogenes might shout, with even more justification than the original Diogenes did. After much deep thought, we have discovered that this incredible Section is not unintelligible; on the contrary, it becomes clear, even radiant, and fully illuminating. Let the reader apply their utmost intellectual strength to it, while we, through careful selection and adjustment, will strive to do our part:
‘Deep has been, and is, the significance of Miracles,’ thus quietly begins the Professor; ‘far deeper perhaps 192than we imagine. Meanwhile, the question of questions were: What specially is a Miracle? To that Dutch King of Siam, an icicle had been a miracle; whoso had carried with him an air-pump, and vial of vitriolic ether, might have worked a miracle. To my Horse, again, who unhappily is still more unscientific, do not I work a miracle, and magical “Open sesame!” every time I please to pay twopence, and open for him an impassable Schlagbaum, or shut Turnpike?
‘Miracles have always held, and still hold, great significance,’ the Professor quietly begins; ‘perhaps even deeper than we realize. Meanwhile, the big question remains: What exactly is a Miracle? For that Dutch King of Siam, an icicle was a miracle; anyone who carried an air pump and a vial of sulfuric ether could have created a miracle. As for my Horse, who unfortunately is even less scientific, don’t I perform a miracle and say “Open sesame!” every time I pay two pence to open an apparently impassable Schlagbaum or close a Turnpike?’
‘“But is not a real Miracle simply a violation of the Laws of Nature?” ask several. Whom I answer by this new question: What are the Laws of Nature? To me perhaps the rising of one from the dead were no violation of these Laws, but a confirmation; were some far deeper Law, now first penetrated into, and by Spiritual Force, even as the rest have all been, brought to bear on us with its Material Force.
‘“But isn’t a real miracle just a violation of the Laws of Nature?” some ask. I respond with this new question: What are the Laws of Nature? To me, perhaps the rising of someone from the dead isn’t a violation of these Laws, but a confirmation; it may be a deeper Law, now newly understood, and through Spiritual Force, just as all the others have been, it is exerted upon us with its Material Force.
‘Here too may some inquire, not without astonishment: On what ground shall one, that can make Iron swim, come and declare that therefore he can teach Religion? To us, truly, of the Nineteenth Century, such declaration were inept enough; which nevertheless to our fathers, of the First Century, was full of meaning.
‘Here too may some inquire, not without astonishment: On what basis can someone who can make iron float come and claim that they can teach religion? To us, truly, of the Nineteenth Century, such a claim seems rather foolish; yet to our fathers, of the First Century, it was deeply significant.
‘“But is it not the deepest Law of Nature that she be constant?” cries an illuminated class: “Is not the Machine of the Universe fixed to move by unalterable rules?” Probable enough, good friends: nay I, too, must believe that the God, whom ancient inspired men assert to be “without variableness or shadow of turning,” does indeed never change; that Nature, that the Universe, which no one whom it so pleases can be prevented from calling a Machine, does move by the most unalterable rules. And now of you, too, I make the old inquiry: What those same unalterable rules, forming the complete Statute-Book of Nature, may possibly be?
“Isn’t it the fundamental Law of Nature that it remains constant?” asks an enlightened group. “Isn’t the Universe's Machine designed to operate by fixed rules?” That’s probably true, my friends; in fact, I must believe that the God, whom ancient inspired individuals claim is “without variableness or shadow of turning,” truly never changes; that Nature, that the Universe, which no one can stop from calling a Machine if they wish, does indeed operate by the most unchanging rules. And now, I ask you the same old question: What exactly are those unchanging rules that make up the complete Law of Nature?
‘They stand written in our Works of Science, say you; in the accumulated records of Man’s Experience?—Was Man with his Experience present at the Creation, then, to see how it all went on? Have any deepest scientific individuals yet dived-down to the foundations of the Universe, and gauged everything there? Did 193the Maker take them into His counsel; that they read His groundplan of the incomprehensible All; and can say, This stands marked therein, and no more than this? Alas, not in anywise! These scientific individuals have been nowhere but where we also are; have seen some handbreadths deeper than we see into the Deep that is infinite, without bottom as without shore.
‘You say they’re documented in our Scientific Works, right? In the collected records of Human Experience?—Was Humanity and its Experience present at Creation to witness how it all unfolded? Have any top scientists actually gone deep enough to understand the foundations of the Universe and measured everything there? Did the Creator involve them in His plans so they could read His blueprint of the incomprehensible Whole and say, This is what’s written here, and nothing more? Sadly, not at all! These scientists have only explored the same spaces we have; they've seen just a little deeper than we can into the infinite Depth that has no bottom or shore.
‘Laplace’s Book on the Stars, wherein he exhibits that certain Planets, with their Satellites, gyrate round our worthy Sun, at a rate and in a course, which, by greatest good fortune, he and the like of him have succeeded in detecting,—is to me as precious as to another. But is this what thou namest “Mechanism of the Heavens,” and “System of the World”; this, wherein Sirius and the Pleiades, and all Herschel’s Fifteen-thousand Suns per minute, being left out, some paltry handful of Moons, and inert Balls, had been—looked at, nicknamed, and marked in the Zodiacal Way-bill; so that we can now prate of their Whereabout; their How, their Why, their What, being hid from us, as in the signless Inane?
‘Laplace’s Book on the Stars, where he shows that certain planets and their moons rotate around our esteemed Sun at a speed and in a path that, by sheer luck, he and others like him managed to uncover—means just as much to me as it does to anyone else. But is this what you call the “Mechanism of the Heavens” and the “System of the World”? This, in which Sirius and the Pleiades, along with all of Herschel’s fifteen thousand suns per minute, are ignored, while a meager handful of moons and lifeless spheres have been—observed, labeled, and recorded in the Zodiacal Way-bill; so that we can now chatter about their whereabouts; their how, their why, their what, being hidden from us, just like in the signless void?
‘System of Nature! To the wisest man, wide as is his vision, Nature remains of quite infinite depth, of quite infinite expansion; and all Experience thereof limits itself to some few computed centuries and measured square-miles. The course of Nature’s phases, on this our little fraction of a Planet, is partially known to us: but who knows what deeper courses these depend on; what infinitely larger Cycle (of causes) our little Epicycle revolves on? To the Minnow every cranny and pebble, and quality and accident, of its little native Creek may have become familiar: but does the Minnow understand the Ocean Tides and periodic Currents, the Trade-winds, and Monsoons, and Moon’s Eclipses; by all which the condition of its little Creek is regulated, and may, from time to time (unmiraculously enough), be quite overset and reversed? Such a Minnow is Man; his Creek this Planet Earth; his Ocean the immeasurable All; his Monsoons and periodic Currents the mysterious Course of Providence through Æons of Æons.
‘System of Nature! To the wisest person, as broad as their vision may be, Nature still has infinite depth and infinite expansion; and all our experience of it is limited to just a few centuries and a handful of square miles. The path of Nature’s phases on our tiny fraction of a planet is partially known to us: but who knows what deeper processes they rely on; what infinitely larger Cycle (of causes) our little Epicycle revolves around? To the minnow, every nook and pebble, every detail and accident of its little stream may be familiar: but does the minnow understand the ocean tides and periodic currents, the trade winds, monsoons, and lunar eclipses; all of which regulate the condition of its small stream, and may, from time to time (not miraculously enough), completely upset and reverse it? Such a minnow is humanity; its creek is this Planet Earth; its ocean is the immeasurable All; its monsoons and periodic currents are the mysterious Course of Providence through eons of eons.
‘We speak of the Volume of Nature: and truly a 194Volume it is,—whose Author and Writer is God. To read it! Dost thou, does man, so much as well know the Alphabet thereof? With its Words, Sentences, and grand descriptive Pages, poetical and philosophical, spread out through Solar Systems, and Thousands of Years, we shall not try thee. It is a Volume written in celestial hieroglyphs, in the true Sacred-writing; of which even Prophets are happy that they can read here a line and there a line. As for your Institutes, and Academies of Science, they strive bravely; and, from amid the thick-crowded, inextricably intertwisted hieroglyphic writing, pick-out, by dextrous combination, some Letters in the vulgar Character, and therefrom put together this and the other economic Recipe, of high avail in Practice. That Nature is more than some boundless Volume of such Recipes, or huge, well-nigh inexhaustible Domestic-Cookery Book, of which the whole secret will in this manner one day evolve itself, the fewest dream.
‘We talk about the Volume of Nature: and it really is a Volume,—whose Author and Writer is God. To read it! Do you, does anyone, even truly understand the Alphabet of it? With its Words, Sentences, and grand descriptive Pages—poetic and philosophical—spanning Solar Systems and Thousands of Years, we won't test you. It's a Volume written in celestial hieroglyphs, in the true Sacred-writing; even Prophets are grateful they can read a line here and a line there. As for your Institutes and Academies of Science, they work hard; and from the thick, tangled, inextricably intertwined hieroglyphic writing, they manage to pick out, through clever combinations, some Letters in the common script and then create this and that economic Recipe, of great value in Practice. That Nature is more than just a limitless Volume of such Recipes, or a massive, nearly inexhaustible Cookbook, from which the whole secret will someday be revealed, few would ever imagine.
‘Custom,’ continues the Professor, ‘doth make dotards of us all. Consider well, thou wilt find that Custom is the greatest of Weavers; and weaves air-raiment for all the Spirits of the Universe; whereby indeed these dwell with us visibly, as ministering servants, in our houses and workshops; but their spiritual nature becomes, to the most, forever hidden. Philosophy complains that Custom has hoodwinked us, from the first; that we do everything by Custom, even Believe by it; that our very Axioms, let us boast of Free-thinking as we may, are oftenest simply such Beliefs as we have never heard questioned. Nay, what is Philosophy throughout but a continual battle against Custom; an ever-renewed effort to transcend the sphere of blind Custom, and so become Transcendental?
‘Custom,’ the Professor continues, ‘makes fools of us all. Think about it, and you'll see that Custom is the greatest of Weavers; it spins threads of air for all the Spirits of the Universe. Because of this, they dwell visibly among us, like serving spirits, in our homes and workplaces; yet their true nature often remains hidden from most people. Philosophy complains that Custom has deceived us from the beginning; that we do everything out of Custom, even our beliefs. Our very principles, no matter how much we claim to be free thinkers, are often just beliefs we’ve never heard questioned. In fact, what is Philosophy but a constant struggle against Custom; a continuous effort to transcend the realm of blind Custom and become Transcendental?’
‘Innumerable are the illusions and legerdemain-tricks of Custom: but of all these, perhaps the cleverest is her knack of persuading us that the Miraculous, by simple repetition, ceases to be Miraculous. True, it is by this means we live; for man must work as well as wonder: and herein is Custom so far a kind nurse, guiding him to his true benefit. But she is a fond 195foolish nurse, or rather we are false foolish nurslings, when, in our resting and reflecting hours, we prolong the same deception. Am I to view the Stupendous with stupid indifference, because I have seen it twice, or two-hundred, or two-million times? There is no reason in Nature or in Art why I should: unless, indeed, I am a mere Work-Machine, for whom the divine gift of Thought were no other than the terrestrial gift of Steam is to the Steam-engine; a power whereby Cotton might be spun, and money and money’s worth realised.
‘There are countless illusions and tricks created by Custom, but perhaps the smartest of all is her ability to convince us that the Miraculous becomes ordinary through simple repetition. It's true that this is how we survive; after all, people need to work as well as marvel. In this way, Custom is like a kind caretaker, guiding us toward what’s truly beneficial. But she is a silly caretaker, or rather we are misguided children, when we continue to believe the same deception during our moments of rest and reflection. Should I regard the Astonishing with mindless indifference just because I’ve seen it twice, or two hundred times, or even two million times? There’s no rationale in Nature or in Art to justify that; unless, of course, I’m just a working machine, for whom the divine gift of Thought is no more than the earthly gift of Steam is to the Steam-engine; a power that allows Cotton to be spun and value to be realized.
‘Notable enough too, here as elsewhere, wilt thou find the potency of Names; which indeed are but one kind of such custom-woven, wonder-hiding Garments. Witchcraft, and all manner of Spectre-work, and Demonology, we have now named Madness and Diseases of the Nerves. Seldom reflecting that still the new question comes upon us: What is Madness, what are Nerves? Ever, as before, does Madness remain a mysterious-terrific, altogether infernal boiling-up of the Nether Chaotic Deep, through this fair-painted Vision of Creation, which swims thereon, which we name the Real. Was Luther’s Picture of the Devil less a Reality, whether it were formed within the bodily eye, or without it? In every the wisest Soul lies a whole world of internal Madness, an authentic Demon Empire; out of which, indeed, his world of Wisdom has been creatively built together, and now rests there, as on its dark foundations does a habitable flowery Earth-rind.
‘Notably enough, here as everywhere else, you will find the power of Names; which are really just one type of custom-made, wonder-concealing garments. Witchcraft, along with all kinds of ghostly activities and demonology, are now labeled as Madness and Nerve Disorders. Rarely do we stop to consider that the new question still arises: What is Madness, what are Nerves? As always, Madness remains a mysterious and terrifying, entirely infernal agitation of the chaotic depths, surfacing through this beautifully painted Vision of Creation that floats on it, which we call the Real. Was Luther’s depiction of the Devil any less real, whether it was imagined inside the eye or outside it? Within every wise Soul lies a whole world of internal Madness, a genuine Demon Empire; from which, in fact, his realm of Wisdom has been creatively constructed, and now rests there, just like a habitable, flowery surface of Earth resting on its dark foundations.
‘But deepest of all illusory Appearances, for hiding Wonder, as for many other ends, are your two grand fundamental world-enveloping Appearances, Space and Time. These, as spun and woven for us from before Birth itself, to clothe our celestial Me for dwelling here, and yet to blind it,—lie all embracing, as the universal canvas, or warp and woof, whereby all minor Illusions, in this Phantasm Existence, weave and paint themselves. In vain, while here on Earth, shall you endeavour to strip them off; you can, at best, but rend them asunder for moments, and look through.
‘But the deepest of all deceptive appearances, meant to conceal wonder and more, are your two major fundamental appearances that envelop the world, Space and Time. These were created for us even before we were born, to outfit our celestial Self for living here, while also blinding it. They lie all-encompassing, like the universal canvas or fabric, through which all smaller illusions in this phantasm of existence weave and paint themselves. While you’re here on Earth, it will be futile to try to remove them; at best, you can only tear them apart for brief moments and see through them.’
‘Fortunatus had a wishing Hat, which when he put on, and wished himself Anywhere, behold he was There. 196By this means had Fortunatus triumphed over Space, he had annihilated Space; for him there was no Where, but all was Here. Were a Hatter to establish himself, in the Wahngasse of Weissnichtwo, and make felts of this sort for all mankind, what a world we should have of it! Still stranger, should, on the opposite side of the street, another Hatter establish himself; and as his fellow-craftsman made Space-annihilating Hats, make Time-annihilating! Of both would I purchase, were it with my last groschen; but chiefly of this latter. To clap-on your felt, and, simply by wishing that you were Anywhere, straightway to be There! Next to clap-on your other felt, and, simply by wishing that you were Anywhen, straightway to be Then! This were indeed the grander: shooting at will from the Fire-Creation of the World to its Fire-Consummation; here historically present in the First Century, conversing face to face with Paul and Seneca; there prophetically in the Thirty-first, conversing also face to face with other Pauls and Senecas, who as yet stand hidden in the depth of that late Time!
Fortunatus had a wishing hat that, when he put it on and wished himself Anywhere, suddenly he was There. 196 With this power, Fortunatus conquered Space; he had eliminated Space entirely; for him, there was no Where, only Here. If a hat maker set up shop in the Wahngasse of Weissnichtwo and created hats like this for everyone, what a world we would have! Even stranger, if across the street another hat maker opened a shop and made Time-annihilating hats while his fellow craftsman made Space-annihilating hats! I would buy from both, even if it meant using my last groschen; but especially from the latter. Just to put on your felt and, by wishing to be Anywhere, instantly be There! Then to put on your other felt and, by wishing to be Anywhen, to be There! This would truly be greater: leaping at will from the Fire-Creation of the World to its Fire-Consummation; being historically present in the First Century, having face-to-face conversations with Paul and Seneca; then prophetically in the Thirty-first, also conversing face to face with other Pauls and Senecas, who remain hidden in the depths of that later Time!
‘Or thinkest thou it were impossible, unimaginable? Is the Past annihilated, then, or only past; is the Future non-extant, or only future? Those mystic faculties of thine, Memory and Hope, already answer: already through those mystic avenues, thou the Earth-blinded summonest both Past and Future, and communest with them, though as yet darkly, and with mute beckonings. The curtains of Yesterday drop down, the curtains of Tomorrow roll up; but Yesterday and Tomorrow both are. Pierce through the Time-element, glance into the Eternal. Believe what thou findest written in the sanctuaries of Man’s Soul, even as all Thinkers, in all ages, have devoutly read it there: that Time and Space are not God, but creations of God: that with God as it is a universal Here, so is it an everlasting Now.
‘Or do you think it's impossible, unimaginable? Is the Past gone forever, or just behind us; is the Future nonexistent, or merely yet to come? Those mysterious parts of you, Memory and Hope, are already responding: through those mystical pathways, you, who are blinded by the Earth, call upon both Past and Future, connecting with them, even if it’s still dimly and with silent gestures. The curtains of Yesterday fall, the curtains of Tomorrow rise; but Yesterday and Tomorrow both are. Break through the boundaries of Time, catch a glimpse of the Eternal. Believe what you find written in the sanctuaries of Man’s Soul, just as all Thinkers, in all ages, have reverently read it there: that Time and Space are not God, but creations of God: that with God, it is a universal Here, just as it is an everlasting Now.
‘And seest thou therein any glimpse of Immortality?—O Heaven! Is the white Tomb of our Loved One, who died from our arms, and had to be left behind us there, which rises in the distance, like a pale, mournfully receding Milestone, to tell how many toilsome uncheered miles we have journeyed on alone,—but a 197pale spectral Illusion! Is the lost Friend still mysteriously Here, even as we are Here mysteriously, with God!—Know of a truth that only the Time-shadows have perished, or are perishable; that the real Being of whatever was, and whatever is, and whatever will be, is even now and forever. This, should it unhappily seem new, thou mayest ponder at thy leisure; for the next twenty years, or the next twenty centuries: believe it thou must; understand it thou canst not.
‘Do you see any hint of Eternal life in this?—Oh Hell! Is the white Tomb of our Loved One, who died in our arms and had to be left behind us there, rising in the distance like a pale, mournfully diminishing Milestone, telling us how many exhausting uninspiring miles we've traveled alone,—just a 197pale spectral Illusion? Is the lost Friend still mysteriously here, just as we are here mysteriously, with God!—Know for sure that only the shadows of time have perished, or are perishable; that the true essence of whatever was, whatever is, and whatever will be, is right now and forever. If this seems unfortunate and new, you can think about it whenever you want; for the next twenty years, or the next twenty centuries: you must believe it; you cannot understand it.
‘That the Thought-forms, Space and Time, wherein, once for all, we are sent into this Earth to live, should condition and determine our whole Practical reasonings, conceptions, and imagines or imaginings,—seems altogether fit, just, and unavoidable. But that they should, furthermore, usurp such sway over pure spiritual Meditation, and blind us to the wonder everywhere lying close on us, seems nowise so. Admit Space and Time to their due rank as Forms of Thought; nay even, if thou wilt, to their quite undue rank of Realities: and consider, then, with thyself how their thin disguises hide from us the brightest God-effulgences! Thus, were it not miraculous, could I stretch forth my hand and clutch the Sun? Yet thou seest me daily stretch forth my hand and therewith clutch many a thing, and swing it hither and thither. Art thou a grown baby, then, to fancy that the Miracle lies in miles of distance, or in pounds avoirdupois of weight; and not to see that the true inexplicable God-revealing Miracle lies in this, that I can stretch forth my hand at all; that I have free Force to clutch aught therewith? Innumerable other of this sort are the deceptions, and wonder-hiding stupefactions, which Space practises on us.
‘That the concepts of Thought-forms, Space, and Time, which determine how we live on this Earth, should shape our entire reasoning, ideas, and imaginations seems entirely appropriate, fair, and unavoidable. But for them to also take control over pure spiritual Meditation and blind us to the wonders that are all around us feels completely different. We can acknowledge Space and Time as legitimate Thought-forms; indeed, we could even elevate them to the status of Realities if we wanted to. But then consider how their subtle disguises hide from us the brightest manifestations of the divine! It would be miraculous if I could reach out my hand and grab the Sun. Yet you see me reach out my hand every day to grasp many things, moving them back and forth. Are you so naïve to think that the miracle lies in the miles of distance or in the weight of objects, failing to recognize that the true, inexplicable miracle revealing the divine is in the very act of stretching out my hand at all, that I have the power to grasp anything with it? There are countless other deceptions and wonders that Space imposes upon us.
‘Still worse is it with regard to Time. Your grand anti-magician, and universal wonder-hider, is this same lying Time. Had we but the Time-annihilating Hat, to put on for once only, we should see ourselves in a World of Miracles, wherein all fabled or authentic Thaumaturgy, and feats of Magic, were outdone. But unhappily we have not such a Hat; and man, poor fool that he is, can seldom and scantily help himself without one.
‘It’s even worse when it comes to Time. Your ultimate anti-magic force and universal trickster is this same deceiving Time. If only we had the Time-erasing Hat to wear just once, we would glimpse a World of Miracles, where all legendary or real magic and feats would be surpassed. But unfortunately, we don’t have such a Hat; and mankind, foolish as he is, can hardly ever help himself without one.
‘Were it not wonderful, for instance, had Orpheus, 198or Amphion, built the walls of Thebes by the mere sound of his Lyre? Yet tell me, Who built these walls of Weissnichtwo; summoning-out all the sandstone rocks, to dance along from the Steinbruch (now a huge Troglodyte Chasm, with frightful green-mantled pools); and shape themselves into Doric and Ionic pillars, squared ashlar houses and noble streets? Was it not the still higher Orpheus, or Orpheuses, who, in past centuries, by the divine Music of Wisdom, succeeded in civilising Man? Our highest Orpheus walked in Judea, eighteen hundred years ago: his sphere-melody, flowing in wild native tones, took captive the ravished souls of men; and, being of a truth sphere-melody, still flows and sounds, though now with thousandfold accompaniments, and rich symphonies, through all our hearts; and modulates, and divinely leads them. Is that a wonder, which happens in two hours; and does it cease to be wonderful if happening in two million? Not only was Thebes built by the music of an Orpheus; but without the music of some inspired Orpheus was no city ever built, no work that man glories-in ever done.
‘Isn't it amazing, for example, that Orpheus or Amphion built the walls of Thebes just by playing his lyre? But tell me, who built the walls of Weissnichtwo, calling all the sandstone rocks to dance from the quarry (now a huge troglodyte chasm with terrifying green pools) and shape themselves into Doric and Ionic pillars, squared stone houses, and grand streets? Was it not the even greater Orpheus, or Orpheuses, who, in centuries past, used the divine Music of Wisdom to civilize humanity? Our greatest Orpheus walked in Judea eighteen hundred years ago: his sphere-melody, flowing in wild natural tones, captivated the enchanted souls of people; and, in truth being sphere-melody, it still flows and resonates, now with a thousand accompaniments and rich symphonies, through all our hearts; inspiring and guiding them divinely. Is it a wonder that happens in two hours? Does it stop being wonderful if it takes two million? Not only was Thebes built by the music of an Orpheus, but no city was ever built, and no great work that humanity takes pride in was ever done, without the music of some inspired Orpheus.
‘Sweep away the Illusion of Time; glance, if thou hast eyes, from the near moving-cause to its far-distant Mover: The stroke that came transmitted through a whole galaxy of elastic balls, was it less a stroke than if the last ball only had been struck, and sent flying? O, could I (with the Time-annihilating Hat) transport thee direct from the Beginnings to the Endings, how were thy eyesight unsealed, and thy heart set flaming in the Light-sea of celestial wonder! Then sawest thou that this fair Universe, were it in the meanest province thereof, is in very deed the star-domed City of God; that through every star, through every grass-blade, and most through every Living Soul, the glory of a present God still beams. But Nature, which is the Time-vesture of God, and reveals Him to the wise, hides Him from the foolish.
‘Sweep away the Illusion of Time; take a look, if you have eyes, from the immediate cause to its distant source: The impact that traveled through a whole galaxy of bouncing balls—was it any less significant than if only the last ball had been struck and sent flying? Oh, if I could (with the Time-annihilating Hat) transport you directly from the Beginnings to the Endings, how your vision would be unveiled, and your heart ignited in the sea of celestial wonder! Then you would see that this beautiful Universe, even in its smallest part, is truly the starry City of God; that through every star, through every blade of grass, and most importantly through every Living Soul, the glory of a present God continues to shine. But Nature, which is God's garment of Time, reveals Him to the wise, yet conceals Him from the foolish.
‘Again, could anything be more miraculous than an actual authentic Ghost? The English Johnson longed, all his life, to see one; but could not, though he went to Cock Lane, and thence to the church-vaults, and tapped on coffins. Foolish Doctor! Did he never, 199with the mind’s eye as well as with the body’s, look round him into that full tide of human Life he so loved; did he never so much as look into Himself? The good Doctor was a Ghost, as actual and authentic as heart could wish; well-nigh a million of Ghosts were travelling the streets by his side. Once more I say, sweep away the illusion of Time; compress the threescore years into three minutes: what else was he, what else are we? Are we not Spirits, that are shaped into a body, into an Appearance; and that fade-away again into air and Invisibility? This is no metaphor, it is a simple scientific fact: we start out of Nothingness, take figure, and are Apparitions; round us, as round the veriest spectre, is Eternity; and to Eternity minutes are as years and æons. Come there not tones of Love and Faith, as from celestial harp-strings, like the Song of beautified Souls? And again, do not we squeak and jibber (in our discordant, screech-owlish debatings and recriminatings); and glide bodeful, and feeble, and fearful; or uproar (poltern), and revel in our mad Dance of the Dead,—till the scent of the morning air summons us to our still Home; and dreamy Night becomes awake and Day? Where now is Alexander of Macedon: does the steel Host, that yelled in fierce battle-shouts at Issus and Arbela, remain behind him; or have they all vanished utterly, even as perturbed Goblins must? Napoleon too, and his Moscow Retreats and Austerlitz Campaigns! Was it all other than the veriest Spectre-hunt; which has now, with its howling tumult that made Night hideous, flitted away?—Ghosts! There are nigh a thousand-million walking the Earth openly at noontide; some half-hundred have vanished from it, some half-hundred have arisen in it, ere thy watch ticks once.
‘Again, could anything be more miraculous than an actual authentic Ghost? The English Johnson longed all his life to see one but couldn’t, even though he went to Cock Lane, then to the church vaults, and tapped on coffins. Foolish Doctor! Did he never, 199with both his mind and body, look around him at that full tide of human life he loved so much; did he never take a moment to look within himself? The good Doctor was a Ghost, as real and genuine as anyone could wish; nearly a million Ghosts were walking the streets beside him. Once more I say, sweep away the illusion of Time; compress sixty years into three minutes: what else was he, what else are we? Are we not Spirits, shaped into a body, into an Appearance; and then fading away again into air and Invisibility? This is no metaphor, it is a simple scientific fact: we emerge from Nothingness, take form, and become Apparitions; around us, as around the most insubstantial specter, is Eternity; and to Eternity, minutes are like years and ages. Do we not hear tones of Love and Faith, like heavenly harp strings, resonating the Song of beautiful Souls? And again, do we not squeak and jabber (in our discordant, screech-owl-like arguments and complaints); and glide ominous, and weak, and fearful; or cause uproar (poltern), and revel in our wild Dance of the Dead,—until the scent of the morning air calls us back to our still Home; and dreamy Night wakes up to Day? Where is Alexander of Macedon now: does the steel army that yelled in fierce battle cries at Issus and Arbela stay behind him; or have they all vanished completely, just like disturbed Goblins must? Napoleon too, with his Moscow Retreats and Austerlitz Campaigns! Was it anything other than a mere Ghost hunt; which has now, along with its howling chaos that made Night unbearable, flitted away?—Ghosts! There are nearly a billion walking the Earth openly at noon; some half-hundred have disappeared from it, some half-hundred have emerged in it, before your watch ticks once.
‘O Heaven, it is mysterious, it is awful to consider that we not only carry each a future Ghost within him; but are, in very deed, Ghosts! These Limbs, whence had we them; this stormy Force; this life-blood with its burning Passion? They are dust and shadow; a Shadow-system gathered round our Me; wherein, through some moments or years, the Divine Essence is to be revealed in the Flesh. That warrior on his strong 200war-horse, fire flashes through his eyes; force dwells in his arm and heart: but warrior and war-horse are a vision; a revealed Force, nothing more. Stately they tread the Earth, as if it were a firm substance: fool! the earth is but a film; it cracks in twain, and warrior and war-horse sink beyond plummet’s sounding. Plummet’s? Fantasy herself will not follow them. A little while ago, they were not; a little while, and they are not, their very ashes are not.
‘Oh Heaven, it’s so mysterious and terrifying to think that we each carry a future Ghost within us; but we are, in fact, Ghosts! These limbs, where did we get them; this stormy Force; this life-blood with its burning Passion? They are just dust and shadow; a Shadow-system gathered around our Me; where, for some moments or years, the Divine Essence is meant to be revealed in the Flesh. That warrior on his strong 200 war-horse, fire flashes in his eyes; strength resides in his arm and heart: but both warrior and war-horse are merely a vision; a revealed Force, nothing more. They walk the Earth majestically, as if it were solid ground: foolish! The earth is just a thin film; it cracks in two, and both warrior and war-horse disappear beyond any depth we can measure. Beyond any depth? Even Fantasy herself won't follow them. A moment ago, they didn’t exist; and soon enough, they won’t be here, not even their ashes will remain.
‘So has it been from the beginning, so will it be to the end. Generation after generation takes to itself the Form of a Body; and forth-issuing from Cimmerian Night, on Heaven’s mission APPEARS. What Force and Fire is in each he expends: one grinding in the mill of Industry; one hunter-like climbing the giddy Alpine heights of Science; one madly dashed in pieces on the rocks of Strife, in war with his fellow:—and then the Heaven-sent is recalled; his earthly Vesture falls away, and soon even to Sense becomes a vanished Shadow. Thus, like some wild-flaming, wild-thundering train of Heaven’s Artillery, does this mysterious Mankind thunder and flame, in long-drawn, quick-succeeding grandeur, through the unknown Deep. Thus, like a God-created, fire-breathing Spirit-host, we emerge from the Inane; haste stormfully across the astonished Earth; then plunge again into the Inane. Earth’s mountains are levelled, and her seas filled up, in our passage: can the Earth, which is but dead and a vision, resist Spirits which have reality and are alive? On the hardest adamant some footprint of us is stamped-in; the last Rear of the host will read traces of the earliest Van. But whence?—O Heaven, whither? Sense knows not; Faith knows not; only that it is through Mystery to Mystery, from God and to God.
‘So it has been from the beginning, and so it will be to the end. Generation after generation takes on the form of a body; and emerging from the darkness, on a mission from Heaven, SHOWS UP. Each one spends the force and energy they have: one grinding away in the mill of Industry; one, like a hunter, climbing the dizzy heights of Science; one, madly shattered on the rocks of Conflict, fighting with others:—and then the Heaven-sent is called back; his earthly form falls away, and soon even to our senses becomes a vanished Shadow. Thus, like some wild, roaring train of Heaven’s artillery, does this mysterious Humankind thunder and blaze, in a long series of quick, magnificent bursts, through the unknown Deep. Thus, like a God-created, fire-breathing host of spirits, we emerge from the Void; rush stormily across the astonished Earth; and then plunge back into the Void. Earth’s mountains are leveled, and her seas filled up, in our passage: can the Earth, which is merely dead and a vision, resist Spirits that have reality and are alive? On the hardest stone, some footprint of us is left behind; the last of the host will see traces of the earliest. But from where?—O Heaven, to where? Our senses do not know; Faith does not know; only that it is from Mystery to Mystery, from God and to God.
“We are such stuff
"We are made of these"
As Dreams are made of, and our little Life
As dreams are made of, and our short lives
Is rounded with a sleep!”’
Is rounded with a nap!’’
CHAPTER IX
CHAPTER 9
CIRCUMSPECTIVE
Here, then, arises the so momentous question: Have many British Readers actually arrived with us at the new promised country; is the Philosophy of Clothes now at last opening around them? Long and adventurous has the journey been: from those outmost vulgar, palpable Woollen-Hulls of Man; through his wondrous Flesh-Garments, and his wondrous Social Garnitures; inwards to the Garments of his very Soul’s Soul, to Time and Space themselves! And now does the Spiritual, eternal Essence of Man, and of Mankind, bared of such wrappages, begin in any measure to reveal itself? Can many readers discern, as through a glass darkly, in huge wavering outlines, some primeval rudiments of Man’s Being, what is changeable divided from what is unchangeable? Does that Earth-Spirit’s speech in Faust,—
Here, then, comes the important question: Have many British readers finally reached this new promised land; is the Philosophy of Clothes now truly unfolding around them? The journey has been long and adventurous: from the most basic, tangible woolen coverings of humanity; through the remarkable flesh garments and the extraordinary social adornments; inwards to the garments of the very essence of the soul, to Time and Space themselves! And now does the spiritual, eternal essence of humanity, stripped of such coverings, start to reveal itself, even in the slightest? Can many readers, as if looking through a dark glass, make out in large, shifting outlines some primitive elements of human existence, distinguishing what is changeable from what is unchangeable? Does that Earth-Spirit’s speech in Faust,—
‘’Tis thus at the roaring Loom of Time I ply,
‘It’s at the roaring Loom of Time that I work,
And weave for God the Garment thou see’st Him by’;
And create for God the garment you see Him in;
or that other thousand-times repeated speech of the Magician, Shakspeare,—
or that other speech by the Magician, Shakespeare, that has been repeated a thousand times,—
‘And like the baseless fabric of this vision,
‘And like the flimsy structure of this dream,
The cloudcapt Towers, the gorgeous Palaces,
The Cloudcapt Towers, the beautiful palaces,
The solemn Temples, the great Globe itself,
The solemn Temples, the great Globe itself,
And all which it inherit, shall dissolve;
And everything it inherits will fade away;
And like this unsubstantial pageant faded,
And like this fleeting show vanished,
Leave not a wrack behind’;
Leave no wreck behind;
begin to have some meaning for us? In a word, do we at length stand safe in the far region of Poetic Creation and Palingenesia, where that Phœnix Death-Birth of Human Society, and of all Human Things, appears possible, is seen to be inevitable?
begin to have some meaning for us? In short, do we finally feel secure in the distant realm of Poetic Creation and Rebirth, where the Phoenix of Death and Birth for Human Society, and for everything Human, seems possible and is recognized as inevitable?
Along this most insufficient, unheard-of Bridge, which the Editor, by Heaven’s blessing, has now seen himself enabled to conclude if not complete, it cannot be his sober calculation, but only his fond hope, that many have travelled without accident. No firm arch, overspanning 202the Impassable with paved highway, could the Editor construct; only, as was said, some zigzag series of rafts floating tumultuously thereon. Alas, and the leaps from raft to raft were too often of a breakneck character; the darkness, the nature of the element, all was against us!
Along this really inadequate, unheard-of Bridge, which the Editor, thanks to some divine blessing, has now managed to finish—if not completely—it's not his rational assessment, but just his hopeful wish, that many have made it across without trouble. He couldn't build a solid arch that would span the Impassable with a paved road; instead, as mentioned, it was just a chaotic series of rafts bobbing around on the water. Unfortunately, the jumps from raft to raft were way too often dangerously risky; the darkness and the nature of the water were definitely not on our side!
Nevertheless, may not here and there one of a thousand, provided with a discursiveness of intellect rare in our day, have cleared the passage, in spite of all? Happy few! little band of Friends! be welcome, be of courage. By degrees, the eye grows accustomed to its new Whereabout; the hand can stretch itself forth to work there: it is in this grand and indeed highest work of Palingenesia that ye shall labour, each according to ability. New labourers will arrive; new Bridges will be built; nay, may not our own poor rope-and-raft Bridge, in your passings and repassings, be mended in many a point, till it grow quite firm, passable even for the halt?
But perhaps, here and there, one in a thousand, equipped with a rare depth of understanding in our time, has managed to clear a path despite everything? Happy few! little group of Friends! welcome, be brave. Gradually, your eye will get used to this new place; your hand can reach out to work here: it is in this grand and truly greatest effort of renewal that you will contribute, each according to your ability. New workers will come; new Bridges will be built; perhaps even our humble rope-and-raft Bridge, as you come and go, can be repaired in many ways until it becomes strong enough, passable even for those with a limp?
Meanwhile, of the innumerable multitude that started with us, joyous and full of hope, where now is the innumerable remainder, whom we see no longer by our side? The most have recoiled, and stand gazing afar off, in unsympathetic astonishment, at our career: not a few, pressing forward with more courage, have missed footing, or leaped short; and now swim weltering in the Chaos-flood, some towards this shore, some towards that. To these also a helping hand should be held out; at least some word of encouragement be said.
Meanwhile, of the countless people who started this journey with us, full of joy and hope, where are the many others we no longer see by our side? Most have turned back, watching us from a distance in unhelpful disbelief at our progress. A few, trying to push ahead with more determination, have lost their footing or fell short; now they are struggling in the overwhelming chaos, some trying to reach this shore, some reaching for that one. To these, we should extend a helping hand; at the very least, offer some words of encouragement.
Or, to speak without metaphor, with which mode of utterance Teufelsdröckh unhappily has somewhat infected us,—can it be hidden from the Editor that many a British Reader sits reading quite bewildered in head, and afflicted rather than instructed by the present Work? Yes, long ago has many a British Reader been, as now, demanding with something like a snarl: Whereto does all this lead; or what use is in it?
Or, to speak plainly, without any fancy language that Teufelsdröckh has unfortunately influenced us with—can the Editor really not see that many British readers are sitting confused and more frustrated than enlightened by this work? Yes, many British readers have long been, just like now, asking with a hint of annoyance: Where is all this going, or what’s the point of it?
In the way of replenishing thy purse, or otherwise aiding thy digestive faculty, O British Reader, it leads to nothing, and there is no use in it; but rather the reverse, for it costs thee somewhat. Nevertheless, if through this unpromising Horn-gate, Teufelsdröckh, 203and we by means of him, have led thee into the true Land of Dreams; and through the Clothes-screen, as through a magical Pierre-Pertuis, thou lookest, even for moments, into the region of the Wonderful, and seest and feelest that thy daily life is girt with Wonder, and based on Wonder, and thy very blankets and breeches are Miracles,—then art thou profited beyond money’s worth; and hast a thankfulness towards our Professor; nay, perhaps in many a literary Tea-circle wilt open thy kind lips, and audibly express that same.
In terms of filling your wallet or helping your digestion, O British Reader, it leads to nothing and is pointless; in fact, it's the opposite since it costs you something. Nonetheless, if through this unpromising Horn-gate, Teufelsdröckh, and we by means of him, have guided you into the true Land of Dreams; and through the Clothes-screen, like a magical Pierre-Pertuis, you glimpse, even for moments, into the realm of the Wonderful, and see and feel that your daily life is surrounded by Wonder, and based on Wonder, and your very blankets and pants are Miracles,—then you gain value beyond money’s worth; and you will feel grateful toward our Professor; indeed, perhaps in many a literary Tea-circle, you will speak up and express that gratitude.
Nay farther, art not thou too perhaps by this time made aware that all Symbols are properly Clothes; that all Forms whereby Spirit manifests itself to sense, whether outwardly or in the imagination, are Clothes; and thus not only the parchment Magna Charta, which a Tailor was nigh cutting into measures, but the Pomp and Authority of Law, the sacredness of Majesty, and all inferior Worships (Worthships) are properly a Vesture and Raiment; and the Thirty-nine Articles themselves are articles of wearing-apparel (for the Religious Idea)? In which case, must it not also be admitted that this Science of Clothes is a high one, and may with infinitely deeper study on thy part yield richer fruit: that it takes scientific rank beside Codification, and Political Economy, and the Theory of the British Constitution; nay rather, from its prophetic height looks down on all these, as on so many weaving-shops and spinning-mills, where the Vestures which it has to fashion, and consecrate and distribute, are, too often by haggard hungry operatives who see no farther than their nose, mechanically woven and spun?
No further, are you not perhaps already aware that all Symbols are essentially Clothing; that all the Forms through which Spirit expresses itself to our senses, whether outwardly or in our imagination, are Clothing; and therefore not only the parchment Magna Carta, which a Tailor was about to cut into pieces, but also the pomp and authority of Law, the sacredness of Majesty, and all lesser forms of Worship (Worthships) are truly a Garment and Attire; and the Thirty-nine Articles themselves are articles of clothing (for the Religious Idea)? In this case, must it not also be accepted that this Science of Clothing is a significant one, and could, with infinitely deeper study on your part, yield richer rewards: that it holds scientific importance alongside Codification, Political Economy, and the Theory of the British Constitution; rather, from its elevated perspective, it looks down on all these, as mere weaving shops and spinning mills, where the Garments that it has to create, consecrate, and distribute, are too often turned out by weary, hungry workers who see no further than their immediate tasks, mechanically woven and spun?
But omitting all this, much more all that concerns Natural Supernaturalism, and indeed whatever has reference to the Ulterior or Transcendental portion of the Science, or bears never so remotely on that promised Volume of the Palingenesie der menschlichen Gesellschaft (Newbirth of Society),—we humbly suggest that no province of Clothes-Philosophy, even the lowest, is without its direct value, but that innumerable inferences of a practical nature may be drawn therefrom. To say nothing of those pregnant considerations, ethical, political, symbolical, which crowd on the Clothes-Philosopher 204from the very threshold of his Science; nothing even of those ‘architectural ideas,’ which, as we have seen, lurk at the bottom of all Modes, and will one day, better unfolding themselves, lead to important revolutions,—let us glance for a moment, and with the faintest light of Clothes-Philosophy, on what may be called the Habilatory Class of our fellow-men. Here too overlooking, where so much were to be looked on, the million spinners, weavers, fullers, dyers, washers, and wringers, that puddle and muddle in their dark recesses, to make us Clothes, and die that we may live,—let us but turn the reader’s attention upon two small divisions of mankind, who, like moths, may be regarded as Cloth-animals, creatures that live, move and have their being in Cloth: we mean, Dandies and Tailors.
But putting all that aside, especially everything related to Natural Supernaturalism, and really anything that touches on the deeper or transcendental aspects of the Science, or is even remotely connected to that promised Volume of the Palingenesie der menschlichen Gesellschaft (Newbirth of Society)—we humbly propose that no area of Clothes-Philosophy, not even the most basic, lacks its own direct value, and that countless practical conclusions can be drawn from it. Not to mention the significant ethical, political, and symbolic considerations that flood the Clothes-Philosopher from the very start of his Science; nor those 'architectural ideas,' which, as we have seen, lie at the heart of all Styles and will eventually, as they become clearer, lead to major changes—let's take a moment and with the faintest light of Clothes-Philosophy, look at what we might call the Habilatory Class of our fellow humans. Here too, overlooking the millions of spinners, weavers, fullers, dyers, washers, and wringers who toil away in their shadows to make us Clothes, and suffer so we can live—let’s just direct the reader’s attention to two small groups of people, who, like moths, can be seen as Cloth-animals, beings that live, move, and exist in Cloth: we mean, Dandies and Tailors.
In regard to both which small divisions it may be asserted without scruple, that the public feeling, unenlightened by Philosophy, is at fault; and even that the dictates of humanity are violated. As will perhaps abundantly appear to readers of the two following chapters.
In relation to both those small divisions, it can be confidently stated that the public sentiment, lacking guidance from Philosophy, is mistaken; and that the principles of humanity are being disregarded. This will likely be clear to readers of the next two chapters.
CHAPTER X
CHAPTER X
THE DANDIACAL BODY
First, touching Dandies, let us consider, with some scientific strictness, what a Dandy specially is. A Dandy is a Clothes-wearing Man, a Man whose trade, office and existence consists in the wearing of Clothes. Every faculty of his soul, spirit, purse and person is heroically consecrated to this one object, the wearing of Clothes wisely and well: so that as others dress to live, he lives to dress. The all-importance of Clothes, which a German Professor of unequalled learning and acumen, writes his enormous Volume to demonstrate, has sprung up in the intellect of the Dandy without effort, like an instinct of genius; he is inspired with Cloth, a Poet of Cloth. What Teufelsdröckh would call a ‘Divine Idea of Cloth’ is born with him; and 205this, like other such Ideas, will express itself outwardly, or wring his heart asunder with unutterable throes.
First, let’s take a closer look at what a Dandy really is, with some scientific precision. A Dandy is someone who is all about fashion, a person whose work, purpose, and life revolve around the art of dressing well. Every aspect of his soul, spirit, wallet, and identity is devoted to one goal: to wear clothes thoughtfully and stylishly. While others dress to survive, he lives to dress. The significance of clothing, which a brilliantly knowledgeable German professor writes an extensive book about, is instinctively understood by the Dandy, as if it’s a natural talent; he embodies the essence of fabric, a Poet of Fabric. What Teufelsdröckh would refer to as a ‘Divine Idea of Cloth’ is inherent in him; and 205 like other profound ideas, it will either manifest outwardly or tear at his heart with indescribable intensity.
But, like a generous, creative enthusiast, he fearlessly makes his Idea an Action; shows himself in peculiar guise to mankind; walks forth, a witness and living Martyr to the eternal worth of Clothes. We called him a Poet: is not his body the (stuffed) parchment-skin whereon he writes, with cunning Huddersfield dyes, a Sonnet to his mistress’ eyebrow? Say, rather, an Epos, and Clotha Virumque cano, to the whole world, in Macaronic verses, which he that runs may read. Nay, if you grant, what seems to be admissible, that the Dandy has a Thinking-principle in him, and some notions of Time and Space, is there not in this Life-devotedness to Cloth, in this so willing sacrifice of the Immortal to the Perishable, something (though in reverse order) of that blending and identification of Eternity with Time, which, as we have seen, constitutes the Prophetic character?
But, like a generous and creative enthusiast, he boldly turns his ideas into action; he presents himself to the world in a unique way; he steps out as a witness and living martyr to the lasting value of clothes. We call him a poet: isn't his body the (stuffed) parchment on which he writes, using clever Huddersfield dyes, a sonnet to his mistress's eyebrow? Rather, it's an epic, and Clotha Virumque cano, to the whole world, in mixed verses that anyone can understand. Indeed, if you accept, as seems reasonable, that the Dandy has a thinking principle within him, along with some notions of time and space, isn't there in this dedication to fabric, in this willing sacrifice of the eternal for the temporary, something (though in reverse order) of that blending and identification of eternity with time, which, as we've seen, forms the prophetic character?
And now, for all this perennial Martyrdom, and Poesy, and even Prophecy, what is it that the Dandy asks in return? Solely, we may say, that you would recognise his existence; would admit him to be a living object; or even failing this, a visual object, or thing that will reflect rays of light. Your silver or your gold (beyond what the niggardly Law has already secured him) he solicits not; simply the glance of your eyes. Understand his mystic significance, or altogether miss and misinterpret it; do but look at him, and he is contented. May we not well cry shame on an ungrateful world, which refuses even this poor boon; which will waste its optic faculty on dried Crocodiles, and Siamese Twins; and over the domestic wonderful wonder of wonders, a live Dandy, glance with hasty indifference, and a scarcely concealed contempt! Him no Zoologist classes among the Mammalia, no Anatomist dissects with care: when did we see any injected Preparation of the Dandy in our Museums; any specimen of him preserved in spirits? Lord Herringbone may dress himself in a snuff-brown suit, with snuff-brown shirt and shoes: it skills not; the undiscerning public, occupied with grosser wants, passes by regardless on the other side.
And now, for all this ongoing suffering, and poetry, and even prophecy, what does the Dandy ask in return? Simply that you recognize his existence; that you accept him as a living being; or, if that fails, as a visual presence or an object that reflects light. He doesn’t ask for your silver or gold (beyond what the stingy Law has already granted him); he only seeks the glance of your eyes. Understand his deeper meaning, or completely miss and misinterpret it; just look at him, and he will be satisfied. Can we not justly criticize an ungrateful world that denies even this small favor; that wastes its eyesight on dried crocodiles and Siamese twins; yet glances hastily and with barely concealed disdain at the domestic marvel of wonders, a live Dandy? No zoologist categorizes him among mammals, no anatomist carefully dissects him: when was the last time we saw a preserved specimen of a Dandy in our museums? Lord Herringbone may dress himself in a dark brown suit, with a matching brown shirt and shoes: it doesn’t matter; the oblivious public, focused on coarser desires, walks past him without a second thought.
206The age of Curiosity, like that of Chivalry, is indeed, properly speaking, gone. Yet perhaps only gone to sleep: for here arises the Clothes-Philosophy to resuscitate, strangely enough, both the one and the other! Should sound views of this Science come to prevail, the essential nature of the British Dandy, and the mystic significance that lies in him, cannot always remain hidden under laughable and lamentable hallucination. The following long Extract from Professor Teufelsdröckh may set the matter, if not in its true light, yet in the way towards such. It is to be regretted, however, that here, as so often elsewhere, the Professor’s keen philosophic perspicacity is somewhat marred by a certain mixture of almost owlish purblindness, or else of some perverse, ineffectual, ironic tendency; our readers shall judge which:
206The era of Curiosity, much like the age of Chivalry, has indeed, in a sense, passed. However, it may just be taking a nap: for here comes the Clothes-Philosophy to oddly revive both! If sound principles of this Science gain acceptance, the true essence of the British Dandy, along with the deeper significance that exists within him, cannot forever stay hidden beneath absurd and sad misconceptions. The following lengthy excerpt from Professor Teufelsdröckh may shed some light on the subject, if not fully clarify it, then at least point us in the right direction. It is unfortunate, though, that here, as frequently elsewhere, the Professor's sharp philosophical insight is slightly clouded by a mix of almost owl-like blindness, or perhaps by some twisted, ineffective, ironic bent; our readers can decide which it is:
‘In these distracted times,’ writes he, ‘when the Religious Principle, driven-out of most Churches, either lies unseen in the hearts of good men, looking and longing and silently working there towards some new Revelation; or else wanders homeless over the world, like a disembodied soul seeking its terrestrial organisation,—into how many strange shapes, of Superstition and Fanaticism, does it not tentatively and errantly cast itself! The higher Enthusiasm of man’s nature is for the while without Exponent; yet does it continue indestructible, unweariedly active, and work blindly in the great chaotic deep: thus Sect after Sect, and Church after Church, bodies itself forth, and melts again into new metamorphosis.
‘In these distracted times,’ he writes, ‘when the Religious Principle, driven out of most Churches, either remains hidden in the hearts of good people, looking and longing and silently working towards some new Revelation; or else wanders aimlessly around the world, like a disembodied soul searching for a physical form,—into how many strange shapes, of Superstition and Fanaticism, does it not tentatively and errantly take on! The higher Enthusiasm of human nature is currently without an Exponent; yet it remains indestructible, constantly active, and works blindly in the great chaotic deep: thus Sect after Sect, and Church after Church, takes shape and then melts again into new transformation.
‘Chiefly is this observable in England, which, as the wealthiest and worst-instructed of European nations, offers precisely the elements (of Heat, namely, and of Darkness), in which such moon-calves and monstrosities are best generated. Among the newer Sects of that country, one of the most notable, and closely connected with our present subject, is that of the Dandies; concerning which, what little information I have been able to procure may fitly stand here.
‘This is especially noticeable in England, which, as the wealthiest and least educated of European nations, provides exactly the conditions (specifically Heat and Darkness) in which such foolishness and absurdities thrive best. Among the newer groups in that country, one of the most notable, and closely related to our current topic, is that of the Dandies; regarding which, the little information I have gathered may appropriately fit here.
‘It is true, certain of the English Journalists, men generally without sense for the Religious Principle, or 207judgment for its manifestations, speak, in their brief enigmatic notices, as if this were perhaps rather a Secular Sect, and not a Religious one; nevertheless, to the psychologic eye its devotional and even sacrificial character plainly enough reveals itself. Whether it belongs to the class of Fetish-worships, or of Hero-worships or Polytheisms, or to what other class, may in the present state of our intelligence remain undecided (schweben). A certain touch of Manicheism, not indeed in the Gnostic shape, is discernible enough: also (for human Error walks in a cycle, and reappears at intervals) a not-inconsiderable resemblance to that Superstition of the Athos Monks, who by fasting from all nourishment, and looking intensely for a length of time into their own navels, came to discern therein the true Apocalypse of Nature, and Heaven Unveiled. To my own surmise, it appears as if this Dandiacal Sect were but a new modification, adapted to the new time, of that primeval Superstition, Self-worship; which Zerdusht, Quangfoutchee, Mohamed, and others, strove rather to subordinate and restrain than to eradicate; and which only in the purer forms of Religion has been altogether rejected. Wherefore, if any one chooses to name it revived Ahrimanism, or a new figure of Demon-Worship, I have, so far as is yet visible, no objection.
‘It's true that some English journalists, usually lacking a sense of the religious principle or understanding of its expressions, write in their brief, mysterious notes as if this were more of a secular group than a religious one. Still, to those with a psychological perspective, its devotional and even sacrificial nature is quite evident. Whether it falls under fetish worship, hero worship, polytheism, or some other category may remain undecided with our current level of understanding. There is a noticeable hint of Manichaeism here, not in the Gnostic sense, but also, as human error tends to be cyclical and reappears over time, it bears a significant resemblance to the superstition of the Athos monks, who, by fasting from all food and staring intently at their own navels for long periods, believed they could discern the true apocalypse of nature and reveal heaven. Personally, it seems to me that this dandy group is just a modern twist on that ancient superstition called self-worship, which Zoroaster, Confucius, Muhammad, and others tried to subdue rather than eliminate completely; this superstition has only been entirely rejected in the purer forms of religion. Therefore, if someone wants to call it revived Ahrimanism or a new form of demon worship, I have no objections so far as I can see.’
‘For the rest, these people, animated with the zeal of a new Sect, display courage and perseverance, and what force there is in man’s nature, though never so enslaved. They affect great purity and separatism; distinguish themselves by a particular costume (whereof some notices were given in the earlier part of this Volume); likewise, so far as possible, by a particular speech (apparently some broken Lingua-franca, or English-French); and, on the whole, strive to maintain a true Nazarene deportment, and keep themselves unspotted from the world.
‘For the rest, these people, filled with the enthusiasm of a new movement, show bravery and determination, and exhibit the resilience found in human nature, no matter how oppressed. They pride themselves on their purity and separation; they differentiate themselves with a specific style of clothing (which was mentioned earlier in this Volume); also, as much as possible, they use a unique way of speaking (which seems to be a mix of English and French); and overall, they aim to uphold a genuine Nazarene conduct and remain untouched by worldly influences.
‘They have their Temples, whereof the chief, as the Jewish Temple did, stands in their metropolis; and is named Almack’s, a word of uncertain etymology. They worship principally by night; and have their Highpriests and Highpriestesses, who, however, do not continue for life. The rites, by some supposed to be of the Menadic 208sort, or perhaps with an Eleusinian or Cabiric character, are held strictly secret. Nor are Sacred Books wanting to the Sect; these they call Fashionable Novels: however, the Canon is not completed, and some are canonical and others not.
‘They have their temples, with the main one, like the Jewish Temple, located in their capital city; it's called Almack’s, which has an uncertain origin. They mainly worship at night and have their high priests and high priestesses, but they don’t hold those positions for life. The rituals, thought by some to be of the Menadic sort or possibly have some Eleusinian or Cabiric elements, are kept strictly secret. They also have sacred texts, which they refer to as Fashionable Novels: however, the canon isn’t fully established, and some are considered canonical while others are not.
‘Of such Sacred Books I, not without expense, procured myself some samples; and in hope of true insight, and with the zeal which beseems an Inquirer into Clothes, set to interpret and study them. But wholly to no purpose: that tough faculty of reading, for which the world will not refuse me credit, was here for the first time foiled and set at naught. In vain that I summoned my whole energies (mich weidlich anstrengte), and did my very utmost; at the end of some short space, I was uniformly seized with not so much what I can call a drumming in my ears, as a kind of infinite, unsufferable, Jews-harping and scrannel-piping there; to which the frightfullest species of Magnetic Sleep soon supervened. And if I strove to shake this away, and absolutely would not yield, there came a hitherto unfelt sensation, as of Delirium Tremens, and a melting into total deliquium: till at last, by order of the Doctor, dreading ruin to my whole intellectual and bodily faculties, and a general breaking-up of the constitution, I reluctantly but determinedly forbore. Was there some miracle at work here; like those Fire-balls, and supernal and infernal prodigies, which, in the case of the Jewish Mysteries, have also more than once scared-back the Alien? Be this as it may, such failure on my part, after best efforts, must excuse the imperfection of this sketch; altogether incomplete, yet the completest I could give of a Sect too singular to be omitted.
I spent a good amount of money getting some samples of these Sacred Books, hoping for genuine insights and with the enthusiasm fitting someone diving into clothing. But it was all in vain: my usual ability to read, which others acknowledge, was completely blocked for the first time. No matter how much I summoned all my energy and tried my hardest, after a short while, I was overcome not so much by a drumming in my ears, but by an unbearable, endless twanging and screeching; to which the most terrifying kind of Magnetic Sleep soon followed. And when I tried to shake it off and absolutely refused to give in, I experienced an unfamiliar sensation, like Delirium Tremens, and a fading into total oblivion; until, at last, on the Doctor's orders, fearing for the safety of my mind and body, and a complete breakdown of my health, I reluctantly but firmly stopped. Was there some kind of miracle happening here, like those fireballs and otherworldly phenomena that, in the context of Jewish Mysteries, have often sent outsiders fleeing? Whatever the case, my failure after giving it my all must excuse the shortcomings of this account; it's far from complete, but it’s the best portrayal I could manage of a group that’s too unique to ignore.
‘Loving my own life and senses as I do, no power shall induce me, as a private individual, to open another Fashionable Novel. But luckily, in this dilemma, comes a hand from the clouds; whereby if not victory, deliverance is held out to me. Round one of those Book-packages, which the Stillschweigen’sche Buchhandlung is in the habit of importing from England, come, as is usual, various waste printed-sheets (Maculatur blätter), by way of interior wrappage: into these the Clothes-Philosopher, with a certain Mohamedan reverence even 209for waste-paper, where curious knowledge will sometimes hover, disdains not to cast his eye. Readers may judge of his astonishment when on such a defaced stray-sheet, probably the outcast fraction of some English Periodical, such as they name Magazine, appears something like a Dissertation on this very subject of Fashionable Novels! It sets out, indeed, chiefly from a Secular point of view; directing itself, not without asperity, against some to me unknown individual named Pelham, who seems to be a Mystagogue, and leading Teacher and Preacher of the Sect; so that, what indeed otherwise was not to be expected in such a fugitive fragmentary sheet, the true secret, the Religious physiognomy and physiology of the Dandiacal Body, is nowise laid fully open there. Nevertheless, scattered lights do from time to time sparkle out, whereby I have endeavoured to profit. Nay, in one passage selected from the Prophecies, or Mythic Theogonies, or whatever they are (for the style seems very mixed) of this Mystagogue, I find what appears to be a Confession of Faith, or Whole Duty of Man, according to the tenets of that Sect. Which Confession or Whole Duty, therefore, as proceeding from a source so authentic, I shall here arrange under Seven distinct Articles, and in very abridged shape lay before the German world; therewith taking leave of this matter. Observe also, that to avoid possibility of error, I, as far as may be, quote literally from the Original:
‘Loving my life and experiences as I do, no force shall convince me, as an individual, to pick up another Fashionable Novel. But fortunately, in this situation, help appears from above; and while not victory, deliverance is offered to me. Among one of those Book-packages, which the Stillschweigen’sche Buchhandlung usually brings in from England, come, as usual, various leftover printed sheets (Maculatur blätter), used as interior wrap: into these the Clothes-Philosopher, with a certain respectful attitude, 209for waste paper, where interesting knowledge sometimes hides, doesn’t hesitate to glance. Readers can understand his surprise when on such a rough, discarded sheet, probably a leftover piece from some English publication, what they call a Magazine, something resembling a dissertation on this very topic of Fashionable Novels appears! It begins, indeed, mainly from a secular point of view; aiming, not without sharpness, at someone unknown to me named Pelham, who seems to be a mystic and the leading teacher and preacher of the group; so that, what really was not expected in such a fleeting, fragmented sheet, the true essence, the religious character and nature of the Dandiacal Body, is not completely revealed there. Nevertheless, scattered insights do occasionally shimmer through, which I have tried to benefit from. Indeed, in one passage taken from the prophecies, or mythic theogonies, or whatever they are (because the style seems quite mixed) of this mystic, I find what seems to be a confession of faith, or the whole duty of man, according to the beliefs of that group. Therefore, this confession or whole duty, having come from such an authentic source, I will arrange it here under seven distinct articles and present it in a very concise form to the German audience; and with that, I will leave this topic. Also, to avoid any chance of error, I will, as much as possible, quote literally from the original:
‘Articles of Faith.
‘Statements of Belief.
‘“1. Coats should have nothing of the triangle about them; at the same time, wrinkles behind should be carefully avoided.
‘“1. Coats shouldn’t have any triangle shapes in their design; at the same time, wrinkles in the back should be carefully avoided.
‘“2. The collar is a very important point: it should be low behind, and slightly rolled.
“2. The collar is really important: it should be low at the back and slightly rolled.”
‘“3. No license of fashion can allow a man of delicate taste to adopt the posterial luxuriance of a Hottentot.
“3. No sense of style can permit a person with refined taste to embrace the excessive adornment typical of a Hottentot.
‘“4. There is safety in a swallow-tail.
‘“4. There is safety in a swallow-tail.
‘“5. The good sense of a gentleman is nowhere more finely developed than in his rings.
‘“5. A gentleman's good sense is nowhere better shown than in his rings.
‘“7. The trousers must be exceedingly tight across the hips.”
‘“7. The pants must be really tight around the hips.”’
‘All which Propositions I, for the present, content myself with modestly but peremptorily and irrevocably denying.
‘All of these propositions I, for now, humbly but firmly and unchangeably deny.
‘In strange contrast with this Dandiacal Body stands another British Sect, originally, as I understand, of Ireland, where its chief seat still is; but known also in the main Island, and indeed everywhere rapidly spreading. As this Sect has hitherto emitted no Canonical Books, it remains to me in the same state of obscurity as the Dandiacal, which has published Books that the unassisted human faculties are inadequate to read. The members appear to be designated by a considerable diversity of names, according to their various places of establishment: in England they are generally called the Drudge Sect; also, unphilosophically enough, the White Negroes; and, chiefly in scorn by those of other communions, the Ragged-Beggar Sect. In Scotland, again, I find them entitled Hallanshakers, or the Stook of Duds Sect; any individual communicant is named Stook of Duds (that is, Shock of Rags), in allusion, doubtless, to their professional Costume. While in Ireland, which, as mentioned, is their grand parent hive, they go by a perplexing multiplicity of designations, such as Bogtrotters, Redshanks, Ribbonmen, Cottiers, Peep-of-Day Boys, Babes of the Wood, Rockites, Poor-Slaves; which last, however, seems to be the primary and generic name; whereto, probably enough, the others are only subsidiary species, or slight varieties; or, at most, propagated offsets from the parent stem, whose minute subdivisions, and shades of difference, it were here loss of time to dwell on. Enough for us to understand, what seems indubitable, that the original Sect is that of the Poor-Slaves; whose doctrines, practices, and fundamental characteristics pervade and animate the whole Body, howsoever denominated or outwardly diversified.
In a strange contrast to this Dandiacal group stands another British sect, which I understand originated in Ireland, where its main base still is; but it is also known in mainland Britain and is quickly spreading everywhere. Since this sect has not published any Canonical books, it remains as obscure to me as the Dandiacal group, which has put out books that are beyond the capabilities of the average person to read. The members seem to be known by a variety of names, depending on their locations: in England, they are typically referred to as the Drudge Sect; also, somewhat unreasonably, the White Negroes; and mainly in contempt by others, the Ragged-Beggar Sect. In Scotland, they are called Hallanshakers or the Stook of Duds Sect; any individual member is referred to as Stook of Duds (meaning Shock of Rags), likely in reference to their professional attire. Meanwhile, in Ireland, which, as mentioned, is their main hive, they have a confusing number of names like Bogtrotters, Redshanks, Ribbonmen, Cottiers, Peep-of-Day Boys, Babes of the Wood, Rockites, and Poor-Slaves; the last one seems to be the primary and generic name. The others may just be minor variations or offshoots of the original name, whose countless subdivisions and subtle differences are not worth spending time on here. It’s enough for us to grasp what seems clear: that the original sect is that of the Poor-Slaves; whose beliefs, practices, and core traits permeate and energize the entire group, regardless of what they are called or how they outwardly differ.
‘The precise speculative tenets of this Brotherhood: how the Universe, and Man, and Man’s Life, picture 211themselves to the mind of an Irish Poor-Slave; with what feelings and opinions he looks forward on the Future, round on the Present, back on the Past, it were extremely difficult to specify. Something Monastic there appears to be in their Constitution: we find them bound by the two Monastic Vows, of Poverty and Obedience; which Vows, especially the former, it is said, they observe with great strictness; nay, as I have understood it, they are pledged, and be it by any solemn Nazarene ordination or not, irrevocably consecrated thereto, even before birth. That the third Monastic Vow, of Chastity, is rigidly enforced among them, I find no ground to conjecture.
‘The specific speculative beliefs of this Brotherhood: how the Universe, and Man, and Man’s Life, present themselves to the mind of an Irish Poor-Slave; with what emotions and thoughts he looks ahead to the Future, around at the Present, and back to the Past, it would be very hard to identify. There seems to be something Monastic in their structure: they are bound by two Monastic Vows, of Poverty and Obedience; these Vows, especially the first one, are said to be observed very strictly; indeed, as I understand it, they are pledged, regardless of whether through any formal Nazarene ordination, irrevocably dedicated to this, even before birth. There’s no evidence to suggest that the third Monastic Vow, of Chastity, is strictly enforced among them.
‘Furthermore, they appear to imitate the Dandiacal Sect in their grand principle of wearing a peculiar Costume. Of which Irish Poor-Slave Costume no description will indeed be found in the present Volume; for this reason, that by the imperfect organ of Language it did not seem describable. Their raiment consists of innumerable skirts, lappets and irregular wings, of all cloths and of all colours; through the labyrinthic intricacies of which their bodies are introduced by some unknown process. It is fastened together by a multiplex combination of buttons, thrums and skewers; to which frequently is added a girdle of leather, of hempen or even of straw rope, round the loins. To straw rope, indeed, they seem partial, and often wear it by way of sandals. In head-dress they affect a certain freedom: hats with partial brim, without crown, or with only a loose, hinged, or valve crown; in the former case, they sometimes invert the hat, and wear it brim uppermost, like a University-cap, with what view is unknown.
‘Furthermore, they seem to imitate the Dandiacal Sect in their main principle of wearing a unique costume. No description of the Irish Poor-Slave Costume can actually be found in this volume; this is because it didn’t seem describable using the limited capacity of language. Their clothing consists of countless skirts, flaps, and uneven wings, made from various fabrics and colors; their bodies are somehow worked into this complex arrangement. It is held together by a mix of buttons, threads, and skewers; often, they also add a belt made of leather, hemp, or even straw rope around their waists. They appear to prefer straw rope, frequently using it as sandals. In terms of headwear, they show a certain freedom: hats with partial brims, those without crowns, or those with only a loose, hinged, or flap crown; in the first case, they sometimes turn the hat upside down, wearing the brim on top, like a university cap, though the reason for this is unclear.
‘The name Poor-Slaves seems to indicate a Slavonic, Polish, or Russian origin: not so, however, the interior essence and spirit of their Superstition, which rather displays a Teutonic or Druidical character. One might fancy them worshippers of Hertha, or the Earth: for they dig and affectionately work continually in her bosom; or else, shut-up in private Oratories, meditate and manipulate the substances derived from her; seldom looking-up towards the Heavenly Luminaries, and then with comparative indifference. Like the Druids, on the 212other hand, they live in dark dwellings; often even breaking their glass-windows, where they find such, and stuffing them up with pieces of raiment, or other opaque substances, till the fit obscurity is restored. Again, like all followers of Nature-Worship, they are liable to outbreakings of an enthusiasm rising to ferocity; and burn men, if not in wicker idols, yet in sod cottages.
The name Poor-Slaves seems to suggest a Slavic, Polish, or Russian origin; however, the true essence and spirit of their beliefs actually reflect a more Teutonic or Druid-like character. One might think they are worshippers of Hertha, or the Earth, because they diligently work in her soil. Alternatively, they often spend time in private shrines, contemplating and working with materials sourced from her, rarely looking up at the stars above, and when they do, it’s with a sense of indifference. Like the Druids, they inhabit dark homes, often breaking their glass windows, where they have them, and stuffing the openings with clothing or other opaque materials until the necessary darkness is achieved. Furthermore, like all nature worshippers, they are prone to outbursts of intense, sometimes ferocious enthusiasm, and will burn people, if not in wicker idols, then in sod huts.
‘In respect of diet, they have also their observances. All Poor-Slaves are Rhizophagous (or Root-eaters); a few are Ichthyophagous, and use Salted Herrings: other animal food they abstain from; except indeed, with perhaps some strange inverted fragment of a Brahminical feeling, such animals as die a natural death. Their universal sustenance is the root named Potato, cooked by fire alone; and generally without condiment or relish of any kind, save an unknown condiment named Point, into the meaning of which I have vainly inquired; the victual Potatoes-and-Point not appearing, at least not with specific accuracy of description, in any European Cookery-Book whatever. For drink, they use, with an almost epigrammatic counterpoise of taste, Milk, which is the mildest of liquors, and Potheen, which is the fiercest. This latter I have tasted, as well as the English Blue-Ruin, and the Scotch Whisky, analogous fluids used by the Sect in those countries: it evidently contains some form of alcohol, in the highest state of concentration, though disguised with acrid oils; and is, on the whole, the most pungent substance known to me,—indeed, a perfect liquid fire. In all their Religious Solemnities, Potheen is said to be an indispensable requisite, and largely consumed.
In terms of diet, they have their own practices. All Poor-Slaves are root eaters; a few eat fish and use salted herring. They avoid other animal foods, except perhaps influenced by some peculiar version of a Brahmin belief, they might consume animals that die naturally. Their main food source is the potato, cooked over fire alone, and typically without any seasoning or flavoring, except for an unknown condiment called Point, which I’ve unsuccessfully tried to learn about; the dish Potatoes-and-Point doesn’t appear in any European cookbooks that I know of. For drinks, they have a striking mix of tastes: milk, which is very mild, and Potheen, which is extremely strong. I’ve tried this along with the English Blue-Ruin and Scotch Whisky, similar drinks consumed by their denomination in those countries: it clearly has some form of alcohol at a very high concentration, although masked with harsh oils; overall, it’s the most intense substance I've encountered—indeed, it’s like liquid fire. During all their religious ceremonies, Potheen is considered essential and is consumed in large quantities.
‘An Irish Traveller, of perhaps common veracity, who presents himself under the to me unmeaning title of The late John Bernard, offers the following sketch of a domestic establishment, the inmates whereof, though such is not stated expressly, appear to have been of that Faith. Thereby shall my German readers now behold an Irish Poor-Slave, as it were with their own eyes; and even see him at meat. Moreover, in the so-precious waste-paper sheet above mentioned, I have found some corresponding picture of a Dandiacal Household, painted by that same Dandiacal Mystagogue, or 213Theogonist: this also, by way of counterpart and contrast, the world shall look into.
‘An Irish Traveller, who is probably telling the truth, presenting himself with the rather meaningless title of The late John Bernard, provides the following sketch of a household whose members, although not explicitly stated, seem to have been of that Faith. With this, my German readers will now see an Irish Poor-Slave, as if with their own eyes; they’ll even see him while eating. Additionally, in the mentioned precious scrap of paper, I have found a corresponding depiction of a Dandiacal Household, painted by that same Dandiacal Mystic, or 213Theogonist: this too, as a counterpart and contrast, the world shall look into.
‘First, therefore, of the Poor-Slave, who appears likewise to have been a species of Innkeeper. I quote from the original:
‘First, then, about the Poor-Slave, who also seems to have been a sort of Innkeeper. I’ll quote from the original:
Poor-Slave Household
Low-Income Household
‘“The furniture of this Caravansera consisted of a large iron Pot, two oaken Tables, two Benches, two Chairs, and a Potheen Noggin. There was a Loft above (attainable by a ladder), upon which the inmates slept; and the space below was divided by a hurdle into two Apartments; the one for their cow and pig, the other for themselves and guests. On entering the house we discovered the family, eleven in number, at dinner: the father sitting at the top, the mother at the bottom, the children on each side, of a large oaken Board, which was scooped-out in the middle, like a trough, to receive the contents of their Pot of Potatoes. Little holes were cut at equal distances to contain Salt; and a bowl of Milk stood on the table: all the luxuries of meat and beer, bread, knives and dishes were dispensed with.” The Poor-Slave himself our Traveller found, as he says, broad-backed, black-browed, of great personal strength, and mouth from ear to ear. His Wife was a sun-browned but well-featured woman; and his young ones, bare and chubby, had the appetite of ravens. Of their Philosophical or Religious tenets or observances, no notice or hint.
“The furniture of this caravanserai consisted of a large iron pot, two oak tables, two benches, two chairs, and a small jug for spirits. There was a loft above (accessible by a ladder), where the occupants slept; the space below was divided by a hurdle into two sections: one for their cow and pig, the other for themselves and guests. Upon entering the house, we found the family, eleven in total, having dinner: the father sitting at the head, the mother at the foot, and the children on either side of a large oak table, which was carved out in the middle to hold the contents of their pot of potatoes. Small holes were cut at equal intervals to hold salt, and a bowl of milk sat on the table; all luxuries like meat and beer, bread, knives, and dishes were absent.” The poor man himself, as the traveler described, was broad-shouldered, with a strong jaw and a wide grin. His wife was sun-kissed but attractive, and their little ones, chubby and bare, had the appetite of ravenous birds. There was no mention or indication of their philosophical or religious beliefs or practices.
‘But now, secondly, of the Dandiacal Household; in which, truly, that often-mentioned Mystagogue and inspired Penman himself has his abode:
‘But now, secondly, of the Dandiacal Household; in which, truly, that frequently mentioned Mystagogue and inspired Writer himself resides:
Dandiacal Household
Dandy Home
‘“A Dressing-room splendidly furnished; violet-coloured curtains, chairs and ottomans of the same hue. Two full-length Mirrors are placed, one on each side of a table, which supports the luxuries of the Toilet. Several Bottles of Perfumes, arranged in a peculiar 214fashion, stand upon a smaller table of mother-of-pearl: opposite to these are placed the appurtenances of Lavation richly wrought in frosted silver. A wardrobe of Buhl is on the left; the doors of which, being partly open, discover a profusion of Clothes; Shoes of a singularly small size monopolise the lower shelves. Fronting the wardrobe a door ajar gives some slight glimpse of a Bathroom. Folding-doors in the background.—Enter the Author,” our Theogonist in person, “obsequiously preceded by a French Valet, in white silk Jacket and cambric Apron.”
‘“A dressing room beautifully furnished; violet-colored curtains, chairs, and ottomans all in the same shade. Two full-length mirrors are placed, one on each side of a table that holds the luxuries of grooming. Several perfume bottles, arranged in a unique 214 fashion, sit on a smaller mother-of-pearl table: across from them are the lavishly designed items for washing in frosted silver. A Buhl wardrobe is on the left; the partially open doors reveal an abundance of clothes; unusually small shoes occupy the lower shelves. Facing the wardrobe, a slightly ajar door offers a glimpse of a bathroom. Folding doors in the background.—Enter the Author,” our Theogonist in person, “obsequiously preceded by a French valet, in a white silk jacket and a cambric apron.”
‘Such are the two Sects which, at this moment, divide the more unsettled portion of the British People; and agitate that ever-vexed country. To the eye of the political Seer, their mutual relation, pregnant with the elements of discord and hostility, is far from consoling. These two principals of Dandiacal Self-worship or Demon-worship, and Poor-Slavish or Drudgical Earth-worship, or whatever that same Drudgism may be, do as yet indeed manifest themselves under distant and nowise considerable shapes: nevertheless, in their roots and subterranean ramifications, they extend through the entire structure of Society, and work unweariedly in the secret depths of English national Existence; striving to separate and isolate it into two contradictory, uncommunicating masses.
‘These are the two factions that currently split the more restless part of the British population and stir up that always-troubled country. From the perspective of the political observer, their relationship, filled with conflict and animosity, is far from reassuring. These two principles of self-worship or demon-worship, and the worship of the oppressed or labor, or whatever form that labor might take, do still appear in vague and relatively insignificant ways: however, in their roots and hidden connections, they spread throughout the whole structure of society and tirelessly work in the hidden depths of English national existence, attempting to divide and isolate it into two opposing, disconnected groups.
‘In numbers, and even individual strength, the Poor-Slaves or Drudges, it would seem, are hourly increasing. The Dandiacal, again, is by nature no proselytising Sect; but it boasts of great hereditary resources, and is strong by union; whereas the Drudges, split into parties, have as yet no rallying-point; or at best only co-operate by means of partial secret affiliations. If, indeed, there were to arise a Communion of Drudges, as there is already a Communion of Saints, what strangest effects would follow therefrom! Dandyism as yet affects to look-down on Drudgism: but perhaps the hour of trial, when it will be practically seen which ought to look down, and which up, is not so distant.
‘In numbers and even in individual strength, it seems that the Poor-Slaves or Drudges are increasing every hour. The Dandiacal, on the other hand, is not a proselytizing group by nature; however, it has significant hereditary resources and is strong through unity. The Drudges, divided into factions, currently lack a common rallying point, or at best only work together through partial secret affiliations. If, indeed, a Communion of Drudges were to emerge, similar to the existing Communion of Saints, what strange outcomes would follow! Dandyism still pretends to look down on Drudgism, but perhaps the moment of reckoning, when it will become clear who should be looking down and who should be looking up, is not far off.
‘To me it seems probable that the two Sects will one 215day part England between them; each recruiting itself from the intermediate ranks, till there be none left to enlist on either side. Those Dandiacal Manicheans, with the host of Dandyising Christians, will form one body: the Drudges, gathering round them whosoever is Drudgical, be he Christian or Infidel Pagan; sweeping-up likewise all manner of Utilitarians, Radicals, refractory Potwallopers, and so forth, into their general mass, will form another. I could liken Dandyism and Drudgism to two bottomless boiling Whirlpools that had broken-out on opposite quarters of the firm land: as yet they appear only disquieted, foolishly bubbling wells, which man’s art might cover-in; yet mark them, their diameter is daily widening: they are hollow Cones that boil-up from the infinite Deep, over which your firm land is but a thin crust or rind! Thus daily is the intermediate land crumbling-in, daily the empire of the two Buchan-Bullers extending; till now there is but a foot-plank, a mere film of Land between them; this too is washed away: and then—we have the true Hell of Waters, and Noah’s Deluge is outdeluged!
‘It seems likely to me that the two groups will eventually split England between them; each will draw from the middle classes until there are no more left to join either side. The fashionable Manicheans, along with the crowd of fashionable Christians, will form one group: the laborers, pulling in anyone who is labor-minded, whether they are Christian or pagan; also rounding up all sorts of utilitarians, radicals, rebellious voters, and so on, into their collective mass, will form another. I could compare Dandyism and the labor movement to two endless boiling whirlpools that have emerged on opposite sides of solid ground: for now, they look like merely disturbed, foolishly bubbling springs, which man's craft might contain; yet keep an eye on them, their diameter is increasing daily: they are hollow cones that rise from the infinite depths, over which your solid ground is just a thin crust! Thus, daily the space in between is eroding, daily the power of the two groups is expanding; until now there is just a narrow strip, a mere film of land separating them; this too is being washed away: and then—we are left with the true hell of waters, and Noah's flood will be outdone!’
‘Or better, I might call them two boundless, and indeed unexampled Electric Machines (turned by the “Machinery of Society”), with batteries of opposite quality; Drudgism the Negative, Dandyism the Positive: one attracts hourly towards it and appropriates all the Positive Electricity of the nation (namely, the Money thereof); the other is equally busy with the Negative (that is to say the Hunger), which is equally potent. Hitherto you see only partial transient sparkles and sputters: but wait a little, till the entire nation is in an electric state; till your whole vital Electricity, no longer healthfully Neutral, is cut into two isolated portions of Positive and Negative (of Money and of Hunger); and stands there bottled-up in two World-Batteries! The stirring of a child’s finger brings the two together; and then—What then? The Earth is but shivered into impalpable smoke by that Doom’s-thunderpeal; the Sun misses one of his Planets in Space, and thenceforth there are no eclipses of the Moon.—Or better still, I might liken’—
‘Or better yet, I might refer to them as two limitless, and truly unmatched Electric Machines (driven by the “Machinery of Society”), with batteries of differing charges; Drudgism as the Negative, Dandyism as the Positive: one continuously draws in and absorbs all the Positive Electricity of the nation (that is, its Money); the other is just as engaged with the Negative (which represents Hunger), which is equally powerful. Up to now, you only see brief, fleeting sparkles and flashes: but just wait a little longer, until the entire nation reaches an electric state; until all your vital Electricity, no longer healthily Neutral, is divided into two separate parts of Positive and Negative (of Money and of Hunger); and remains there contained in two World-Batteries! The touch of a child's finger brings the two together; and then—What then? The Earth is shattered into fine particles by that Doom’s thunderclap; the Sun loses one of its Planets in Space, and from that moment on, there are no more lunar eclipses.—Or better yet, I might liken—’
Oh! enough, enough of likenings and similitudes; 216in excess of which, truly, it is hard to say whether Teufelsdröckh or ourselves sin the more.
Oh! That's enough of comparisons and similarities; 216beyond which, honestly, it's tough to say who Teufelsdröckh or we, are more at fault.
We have often blamed him for a habit of wire-drawing and over-refining; from of old we have been familiar with his tendency to Mysticism and Religiosity, whereby in everything he was still scenting-out Religion: but never perhaps did these amaurosis-suffusions so cloud and distort his otherwise most piercing vision, as in this of the Dandiacal Body! Or was there something of intended satire; is the Professor and Seer not quite the blinkard he affects to be? Of an ordinary mortal we should have decisively answered in the affirmative; but with a Teufelsdröckh there ever hovers some shade of doubt. In the mean while, if satire were actually intended, the case is little better. There are not wanting men who will answer: Does your Professor take us for simpletons? His irony has overshot itself; we see through it, and perhaps through him.
We have often criticized him for his tendency to overthink and overly refine things; we've known for a long time about his inclination toward Mysticism and Religiosity, where he constantly seeks out Religion in everything. Yet, perhaps never before did these obscure visions cloud and distort his otherwise sharp insight as much as in his thoughts on the Dandiacal Body! Or was there a hint of intentional satire here; is the Professor and Seer not quite as oblivious as he pretends to be? For an ordinary person, we would definitely say yes, but with someone like Teufelsdröckh, there's always some uncertainty. Meanwhile, if satire was indeed intended, the situation isn't much better. There are plenty of people who would respond: Does your Professor think we're fools? His irony has missed the mark; we see right through it, and maybe even through him.
CHAPTER XI
CHAPTER 11
TAILORS
Thus, however, has our first Practical Inference from the Clothes-Philosophy, that which respects Dandies, been sufficiently drawn; and we come now to the second, concerning Tailors. On this latter our opinion happily quite coincides with that of Teufelsdröckh himself, as expressed in the concluding page of his Volume, to whom, therefore, we willingly give place. Let him speak his own last words, in his own way:
So, we've sufficiently drawn our first Practical Inference from the Clothes-Philosophy about Dandies. Now we move on to the second, which is about Tailors. Fortunately, our view aligns perfectly with that of Teufelsdröckh himself, as expressed on the last page of his book. So let's let him speak his final words in his own style:
‘Upwards of a century,’ says he, ‘must elapse, and still the bleeding fight of Freedom be fought, whoso is noblest perishing in the van, and thrones be hurled on altars like Pelion on Ossa, and the Moloch of Iniquity have his victims, and the Michael of Justice his martyrs, before Tailors can be admitted to their true prerogatives of manhood, and this last wound of suffering Humanity be closed.
‘Over a hundred years,’ he says, ‘must pass, and the ongoing struggle for Freedom will still be waged, with the noblest perishing in the front lines, and thrones thrown onto altars like Pelion on Ossa, and the Moloch of Iniquity will have his victims, while the Michael of Justice will have his martyrs, before Tailors can be recognized for their rightful status as men, and this final wound of suffering Humanity can be healed.
217‘If aught in the history of the world’s blindness could surprise us, here might we indeed pause and wonder. An idea has gone abroad, and fixed itself down into a wide-spreading rooted error, that Tailors are a distinct species in Physiology, not Men, but fractional Parts of a Man. Call any one a Schneider (Cutter, Tailor), is it not, in our dislocated, hood-winked, and indeed delirious condition of Society, equivalent to defying his perpetual fellest enmity? The epithet schneider-mässig (tailor-like) betokens an otherwise unapproachable degree of pusillanimity: we introduce a Tailor’s-Melancholy, more opprobrious than any Leprosy, into our Books of Medicine; and fable I know not what of his generating it by living on Cabbage. Why should I speak of Hans Sachs (himself a Shoemaker, or kind of Leather-Tailor), with his Schneider mit dem Panier? Why of Shakspeare, in his Taming of the Shrew, and elsewhere? Does it not stand on record that the English Queen Elizabeth, receiving a deputation of Eighteen Tailors, addressed them with a “Good morning, gentlemen both!” Did not the same virago boast that she had a Cavalry Regiment, whereof neither horse nor man could be injured; her Regiment, namely, of Tailors on Mares? Thus everywhere is the falsehood taken for granted, and acted-on as an indisputable fact.
217‘If anything in the history of the world's ignorance could surprise us, we might really stop and think here. An idea has spread widely and settled into a deep-rooted misconception that Tailors are a different category in terms of human nature, not fully human, but mere fragments of a person. Calling someone a Schneider (Cutter, Tailor) is, in our fractured, blinded, and truly confused state of society, like daring his ongoing and fierce hatred. The term schneider-mässig (tailor-like) suggests a level of cowardice that is otherwise unattainable: we have introduced a Tailor’s-Melancholy, more shameful than any disease, into our medical texts; and myths abound about him causing it by living on cabbage. Why should I even mention Hans Sachs (who was himself a Shoemaker or a type of Leather-Tailor), with his Schneider mit dem Panier? What about Shakespeare, in his Taming of the Shrew and other works? Isn't it noted that Queen Elizabeth of England, when meeting with eighteen Tailors, greeted them with a “Good morning, gentlemen both!”? Did not the same bold woman claim that she had a Cavalry Regiment, one where neither horse nor man could be harmed; her Regiment, made up of Tailors on mares? Thus, everywhere the falsehood is accepted and treated as an undeniable truth.
‘Nevertheless, need I put the question to any Physiologist, whether it is disputable or not? Seems it not at least presumable, that, under his Clothes, the Tailor has bones and viscera, and other muscles than the sartorious? Which function of manhood is the Tailor not conjectured to perform? Can he not arrest for debt? Is he not in most countries a tax-paying animal?
‘Nevertheless, do I really need to ask any Physiologist whether this is debatable or not? Isn't it at least reasonable to assume that, under his clothes, the Tailor has bones, organs, and other muscles besides the sartorius? Which aspects of manhood is the Tailor not expected to fulfill? Can he not be arrested for debt? Is he not, in most countries, a tax-paying individual?’
‘To no reader of this Volume can it be doubtful which conviction is mine. Nay if the fruit of these long vigils, and almost preternatural Inquiries, is not to perish utterly, the world will have approximated towards a higher Truth; and the doctrine, which Swift, with the keen forecast of genius, dimly anticipated, will stand revealed in clear light: that the Tailor is not only a Man, but something of a Creator or Divinity. Of Franklin it was said, that “he snatched the Thunder from Heaven and the Sceptre from Kings”: but which 218is greater, I would ask, he that lends, or he that snatches? For, looking away from individual cases, and how a Man is by the Tailor new-created into a Nobleman, and clothed not only with Wool but with Dignity and a Mystic Dominion,—is not the fair fabric of Society itself, with all its royal mantles and pontifical stoles, whereby, from nakedness and dismemberment, we are organised into Polities, into nations, and a whole co-operating Mankind, the creation, as has here been often irrefragably evinced, of the Tailor alone?—What too are all Poets and moral Teachers, but a species of Metaphorical Tailors? Touching which high Guild the greatest living Guild-brother has triumphantly asked us: “Nay if thou wilt have it, who but the Poet first made Gods for men; brought them down to us; and raised us up to them?”
‘To anyone reading this book, it should be clear what my belief is. If the results of these long nights and almost supernatural inquiries aren’t completely lost, the world will have moved closer to a deeper truth; and the idea that Swift, with his brilliant foresight, subtly predicted will become clear: that the Tailor is not just a man, but something like a Creator or a Divine being. It was said of Franklin that “he snatched the Thunder from Heaven and the Sceptre from Kings”: but I ask, which is greater, the one who gives or the one who takes? Because, when we look beyond individual cases and consider how a man is transformed by the Tailor into a Nobleman, dressed not just in wool but with dignity and a kind of mystical authority, isn’t the beautiful structure of Society itself—with all its royal robes and clerical vestments—what shapes us from being naked and fragmented into organized societies, nations, and a collaborating humanity, the creation solely of the Tailor? And what are all Poets and moral Teachers, if not a kind of Metaphorical Tailors? Regarding that esteemed Guild, the greatest living member has confidently posed the question: “If you really think about it, who but the Poet first created Gods for men; brought them down to us; and elevated us to them?”’
‘And this is he, whom sitting downcast, on the hard basis of his Shopboard, the world treats with contumely, as the ninth part of a man! Look up, thou much-injured one, look up with the kindling eye of hope, and prophetic bodings of a noble better time. Too long hast thou sat there, on crossed legs, wearing thy ankle-joints to horn; like some sacred Anchorite, or Catholic Fakir, doing penance, drawing down Heaven’s richest blessings, for a world that scoffed at thee. Be of hope! Already streaks of blue peer through our clouds; the thick gloom of Ignorance is rolling asunder, and it will be Day. Mankind will repay with interest their long-accumulated debt: the Anchorite that was scoffed at will be worshipped; the Fraction will become not an Integer only, but a Square and Cube. With astonishment the world will recognise that the Tailor is its Hierophant and Hierarch, or even its God.
‘And this is the person who, sitting there discouraged on the hard surface of his workbench, is treated with disdain by the world, as if he’s only a fraction of a man! Look up, you who have been wronged, look up with the spark of hope and the foresight of a brighter future. You’ve been sitting there too long, with your legs crossed, wearing out your ankles like some holy hermit or devoted ascetic, doing penance and calling down Heaven’s greatest blessings for a world that mocks you. Have hope! Already, rays of blue are peeking through our clouds; the thick darkness of Ignorance is breaking apart, and it will be Day. Humanity will repay its long-standing debt with interest: the hermit who was mocked will be revered; the Fraction will not just be an Integer, but a Square and a Cube. With astonishment, the world will realize that the Tailor is its teacher and leader, or even its God.
‘As I stood in the Mosque of St. Sophia, and looked upon these Four-and-Twenty Tailors, sewing and embroidering that rich Cloth, which the Sultan sends yearly for the Caaba of Mecca, I thought within myself: How many other Unholies has your covering Art made holy, besides this Arabian Whinstone!
‘As I stood in the Mosque of St. Sophia and looked at these Twenty-Four Tailors sewing and embroidering that rich cloth, which the Sultan sends every year for the Caaba of Mecca, I thought to myself: How many other unholy things has your covering art made holy, besides this Arabian stone!
‘Still more touching was it when, turning the corner of a lane, in the Scottish Town of Edinburgh, I came 219upon a Signpost, whereon stood written that such and such a one was “Breeches-Maker to his Majesty”; and stood painted the Effigies of a Pair of Leather Breeches, and between the knees these memorable words, Sic itur ad astra. Was not this the martyr prison-speech of a Tailor sighing indeed in bonds, yet sighing towards deliverance, and prophetically appealing to a better day? A day of justice, when the worth of Breeches would be revealed to man, and the Scissors become forever venerable.
‘It was even more moving when, turning the corner of a street in the Scottish town of Edinburgh, I came upon a signpost that read that someone was the “Breeches-Maker to his Majesty”; and it displayed a picture of a pair of leather breeches, with the memorable words, So we reach for the stars written between the knees. Was this not the emotional prison speech of a tailor, truly longing for freedom, yet hoping for a better future? A day of justice when the value of breeches would be recognized by everyone, and scissors would be forever respected.
‘Neither, perhaps, may I now say, has his appeal been altogether in vain. It was in this high moment, when the soul, rent, as it were, and shed asunder, is open to inspiring influence, that I first conceived this Work on Clothes: the greatest I can ever hope to do; which has already, after long retardations, occupied, and will yet occupy, so large a section of my Life; and of which the Primary and simpler Portion may here find its conclusion.’
‘Maybe I can now say that his appeal hasn’t been completely in vain. It was during this intense moment, when the soul feels torn apart and vulnerable, that I first came up with this Work on Clothes: the greatest thing I can ever hope to achieve; which has already taken, and will continue to take, a significant portion of my life; and of which the main and simpler part may now reach its conclusion.’
CHAPTER XII
CHAPTER 12
FAREWELL
So have we endeavoured, from the enormous, amorphous Plum-pudding, more like a Scottish Haggis, which Herr Teufelsdröckh had kneaded for his fellow mortals, to pick-out the choicest Plums, and present them separately on a cover of our own. A laborious, perhaps a thankless enterprise; in which, however, something of hope has occasionally cheered us, and of which we can now wash our hands not altogether without satisfaction. If hereby, though in barbaric wise, some morsel of spiritual nourishment have been added to the scanty ration of our beloved British world, what nobler recompense could the Editor desire? If it prove otherwise, why should he murmur? Was not this a Task which Destiny, in any case, had appointed him; which having now done with, he sees his general Day’s-work so much the lighter, so much the shorter?
So we have tried to sift through the vast, shapeless Plum-pudding, which resembles a Scottish Haggis, that Herr Teufelsdröckh had mixed for his fellow humans, to select the best Plums and present them individually on our own cover. It’s a tough, perhaps a thankless task; yet, along the way, some moments of hope have occasionally uplifted us, and now we can step back with a sense of satisfaction. If, by doing this, even in a rough way, we've added a bit of spiritual nourishment to the limited offerings of our cherished British world, what greater reward could the Editor want? If it turns out otherwise, why should he complain? Wasn’t this a duty that Destiny had assigned to him; and now that it’s done, doesn’t he find his overall work much lighter and shorter?
220Of Professor Teufelsdröckh it seems impossible to take leave without a mingled feeling of astonishment, gratitude and disapproval. Who will not regret that talents, which might have profited in the higher walks of Philosophy, or in Art itself, have been so much devoted to a rummaging among lumber-rooms; nay too often to a scraping in kennels, where lost rings and diamond-necklaces are nowise the sole conquests? Regret is unavoidable; yet censure were loss of time. To cure him of his mad humours British Criticism would essay in vain: enough for her if she can, by vigilance, prevent the spreading of such among ourselves. What a result, should this piebald, entangled, hyper-metaphorical style of writing, not to say of thinking, become general among our Literary men! As it might so easily do. Thus has not the Editor himself, working over Teufelsdröckh’s German, lost much of his own English purity? Even as the smaller whirlpool is sucked into the larger, and made to whirl along with it, so has the lesser mind, in this instance, been forced to become portion of the greater, and like it, see all things figuratively: which habit time and assiduous effort will be needed to eradicate.
220It's hard to say goodbye to Professor Teufelsdröckh without feeling a mix of amazement, gratitude, and disappointment. Who wouldn't wish that his talents, which could have thrived in the higher realms of Philosophy or Art, weren't wasted digging through junk piles? Too often, he's also been found scraping around in gutters, where lost rings and diamond necklaces are just the tip of the iceberg. Regret is inevitable, but criticizing him would be a waste of time. Trying to correct his eccentricities through British Criticism would be pointless; it's enough for her to keep watch and prevent such attitudes from spreading among us. Just imagine if this chaotic, tangled, hyper-metaphorical style of writing—and thinking—became the norm among our literary figures! It could easily happen. Even the Editor, while working on Teufelsdröckh's German, has likely lost some of his own English clarity. Just like a small whirlpool gets pulled into a larger one and starts spiraling along, the lesser mind here has been compelled to merge with the greater and to see everything metaphorically. This tendency will take time and consistent effort to break free from.
Nevertheless, wayward as our Professor shows himself, is there any reader that can part with him in declared enmity? Let us confess, there is that in the wild, much-suffering, much-inflicting man, which almost attaches us. His attitude, we will hope and believe, is that of a man who had said to Cant, Begone; and to Dilettantism, Here thou canst not be; and to Truth, Be thou in place of all to me: a man who had manfully defied the ‘Time-prince,’ or Devil, to his face; nay perhaps, Hannibal-like, was mysteriously consecrated from birth to that warfare, and now stood minded to wage the same, by all weapons, in all places, at all times. In such a cause, any soldier, were he but a Polack Scythe-man, shall be welcome.
Yet, no matter how wayward our Professor seems, is there any reader who can truly feel hostile toward him? Let’s be honest, there’s something about this wild, deeply affected, and affecting man that draws us in. We hope and believe his stance is that of someone who has told Pretentiousness to go away, dismissed Dilettantism, and welcomed Truth to take its place: a person who has bravely confronted the ‘Time-prince,’ or Devil, face-to-face; perhaps like Hannibal, destined from birth for this battle, ready to fight using all means, everywhere, at all times. In such a cause, any soldier, even if just a Polish Scythe-man, will be welcomed.
Still the question returns on us: How could a man occasionally of keen insight, not without keen sense of propriety, who had real Thoughts to communicate, resolve to emit them in a shape bordering so closely on the absurd? Which question he were wiser than 221the present Editor who should satisfactorily answer. Our conjecture has sometimes been, that perhaps Necessity as well as Choice was concerned in it. Seems it not conceivable that, in a Life like our Professor’s, where so much bountifully given by Nature had in Practice failed and misgone, Literature also would never rightly prosper: that striving with his characteristic vehemence to paint this and the other Picture, and ever without success, he at last desperately dashes his sponge, full of all colours, against the canvas, to try whether it will paint Foam? With all his stillness, there were perhaps in Teufelsdröckh desperation enough for this.
Still, the question comes back to us: How could a man who occasionally had sharp insights, wasn't lacking in a sense of propriety, and truly had thoughts to share choose to express them in such an absurd way? This is a question that the current Editor would be wiser to answer satisfactorily. Sometimes we speculate that perhaps both Necessity and Choice played a role in it. Isn’t it conceivable that in a life like our Professor’s, where so much generously provided by Nature had gone wrong in practice, Literature would also fail to thrive? That in his characteristic fervor to capture this or that image and failing every time, he finally throws his sponge, filled with all sorts of colors, against the canvas to see if it will create Foam? With all his calmness, there might have been enough desperation in Teufelsdröckh for this.
A second conjecture we hazard with even less warranty. It is, that Teufelsdröckh is not without some touch of the universal feeling, a wish to proselytise. How often already have we paused, uncertain whether the basis of this so enigmatic nature were really Stoicism and Despair, or Love and Hope only seared into the figure of these! Remarkable, moreover, is this saying of his: ‘How were Friendship possible? In mutual devotedness to the Good and True: otherwise impossible; except as Armed Neutrality, or hollow Commercial League. A man, be the Heavens ever praised, is sufficient for himself; yet were ten men, united in Love, capable of being and of doing what ten thousand singly would fail in. Infinite is the help man can yield to man.’ And now in conjunction therewith consider this other: ‘It is the Night of the World, and still long till it be Day: we wander amid the glimmer of smoking ruins, and the Sun and the Stars of Heaven are as if blotted out for a season; and two immeasurable Phantoms, Hypocrisy and Atheism, with the Gowl, Sensuality, stalk abroad over the Earth, and call it theirs: well at ease are the Sleepers for whom Existence is a shallow Dream.’
A second guess we make with even less certainty is that Teufelsdröckh has some level of universal feeling, a desire to convert others. How many times have we paused, unsure whether the foundation of this mysterious nature is really Stoicism and Despair, or just Love and Hope burned into it? Also notable is this saying of his: ‘How can Friendship exist? In mutual commitment to the Good and True: otherwise impossible; except as Armed Neutrality, or a hollow Business Agreement. A man, thank the Heavens, is enough for himself; yet if ten men, united in Love, could achieve what ten thousand would fail to accomplish alone. The help one person can give to another is limitless.’ And now, alongside this, consider this other thought: ‘It is the Night of the World, and still a long way to Day: we wander amid the flicker of smoking ruins, and the Sun and Stars of Heaven seem temporarily blotted out; and two vast Phantoms, Hypocrisy and Atheism, along with Sensuality, roam the Earth and claim it as theirs: the Sleepers, for whom Existence is a shallow Dream, are quite comfortable.’
But what of the awestruck Wakeful who find it a Reality? Should not these unite; since even an authentic Spectre is not visible to Two?—In which case were this enormous Clothes-Volume properly an enormous Pitchpan, which our Teufelsdröckh in his lone watch-tower had kindled, that it might flame far and 222wide through the Night, and many a disconsolately wandering spirit be guided thither to a Brother’s bosom!—We say as before, with all his malign Indifference, who knows what mad Hopes this man may harbour?
But what about the amazed Wakeful who see it as a Reality? Shouldn't they come together, since even a real Spectre can't be seen by two people?—In that case, if this huge Clothes-Volume were really a massive Pitchpan that our Teufelsdröckh had lit in his lonely watchtower, it could flame brightly through the Night, guiding many a lost spirit to a Brother’s embrace!—We say again, despite his harmful Indifference, who knows what crazy Hopes this man might have?
Meanwhile there is one fact to be stated here, which harmonises ill with such conjecture; and, indeed, were Teufelsdröckh made like other men, might as good as altogether subvert it. Namely, that while the Beacon-fire blazed its brightest, the Watchman had quitted it; that no pilgrim could now ask him: Watchman, what of the Night? Professor Teufelsdröckh, be it known is no longer visibly present at Weissnichtwo, but again to all appearance lost in space! Some time ago, the Hofrath Heuschrecke was pleased to favour us with another copious Epistle; wherein much is said about the ‘Population-Institute’; much repeated in praise of the Paper-bag Documents, the hieroglyphic nature of which our Hofrath still seems not to have surmised; and, lastly, the strangest occurrence communicated, to us for the first time, in the following paragraph:
Meanwhile, there’s one fact to mention here that doesn’t really fit with that idea; and honestly, if Teufelsdröckh were like other people, it could almost completely overturn it. That is, while the Beacon fire burned its brightest, the Watchman had left it; that no traveler could now ask him: Watchman, what’s the Night like? Professor Teufelsdröckh, it should be known, is no longer visibly present at Weissnichtwo, but once again appears to be lost in space! A while ago, Hofrath Heuschrecke was kind enough to send us another lengthy letter; in which a lot is said about the ‘Population-Institute’; much is repeated in praise of the Paper-bag Documents, the hieroglyphic nature of which our Hofrath still doesn’t seem to have figured out; and lastly, the weirdest event is communicated to us for the first time in the following paragraph:
‘Ew. Wohlgeboren will have seen from the public Prints, with what affectionate and hitherto fruitless solicitude Weissnichtwo regards the disappearance of her Sage. Might but the united voice of Germany prevail on him to return; nay, could we but so much as elucidate for ourselves by what mystery he went away! But, alas, old Lieschen experiences or affects the profoundest deafness, the profoundest ignorance: in the Wahngasse all lies swept, silent, sealed up; the Privy Council itself can hitherto elicit no answer.
‘Ew. Wohlgeboren must have seen from the public prints how much Weissnichtwo cares about her Sage's disappearance, even if her concern hasn’t led to anything yet. If only the united voice of Germany could convince him to come back; or if we could just figure out what mystery caused him to leave! But, unfortunately, old Lieschen seems to be acting completely deaf and clueless: everything in Wahngasse is quiet, sealed up, and the Privy Council hasn’t been able to get any answers so far.
‘It had been remarked that while the agitating news of those Parisian Three Days flew from mouth to mouth, and dinned every ear in Weissnichtwo, Herr Teufelsdröckh was not known, at the Gans or elsewhere, to have spoken, for a whole week, any syllable except once these three: Es geht an (It is beginning). Shortly after, as Ew. Wohlgeboren knows, was the public tranquillity here, as in Berlin, threatened by a Sedition of the Tailors. Nor did there want Evil-wishers, or perhaps mere desperate Alarmists, who asserted that the closing Chapter of the Clothes-Volume was to blame. 223In this appalling crisis, the serenity of our Philosopher was indescribable; nay, perhaps through one humble individual, something thereof might pass into the Rath (Council) itself, and so contribute to the country’s deliverance. The Tailors are now entirely pacificated.—
‘It was noted that while the shocking news of those Three Days in Paris spread from person to person and filled every ear in Weissnichtwo, Herr Teufelsdröckh hadn’t been known, at the Gans or anywhere else, to have said anything for a whole week except these three words: Es geht an (It is beginning). Shortly after, as Ew. Wohlgeboren knows, the public calm here, like in Berlin, was threatened by a Tailor’s Riot. There were also those who wished harm, or maybe just frightened Alarmists, claiming that the ending of the Clothes-Volume was to blame. 223 In this alarming situation, our Philosopher's calmness was beyond words; perhaps through one humble individual, a bit of that could even reach the Rath (Council) itself and help save the nation. The Tailors are now completely pacified.—
‘To neither of these two incidents can I attribute our loss: yet still comes there the shadow of a suspicion out of Paris and its Politics. For example, when the Saint-Simonian Society transmitted its Propositions hither, and the whole Gans was one vast cackle of laughter, lamentation and astonishment, our Sage sat mute; and at the end of the third evening said merely: “Here also are men who have discovered, not without amazement, that Man is still Man; of which high, long-forgotten Truth you already see them make a false application.” Since then, as has been ascertained by examination of the Post-Director, there passed at least one Letter with its Answer between the Messieurs Bazard-Enfantin and our Professor himself; of what tenor can now only be conjectured. On the fifth night following, he was seen for the last time!
‘Neither of these two incidents can I link to our loss; still, there's a lingering suspicion coming out of Paris and its politics. For instance, when the Saint-Simonian Society sent its proposals here, and everyone in the Gans was in a frenzy of laughter, sorrow, and shock, our Sage remained silent. By the end of the third evening, he simply remarked: “Here are men who have discovered, not without surprise, that Man is still Man; and from this long-forgotten Truth, you can see them make a mistaken application.” Since then, an investigation of the Post-Director has revealed that at least one letter exchanged its responses between Messieurs Bazard-Enfantin and our Professor; the content of which can only be speculated now. On the fifth night that followed, he was seen for the last time!’
‘Has this invaluable man, so obnoxious to most of the hostile Sects that convulse our Era, been spirited away by certain of their emissaries; or did he go forth voluntarily to their head-quarters to confer with them and confront them? Reason we have, at least of a negative sort, to believe the Lost still living; our widowed heart also whispers that ere long he will himself give a sign. Otherwise, indeed, his archives must, one day, be opened by Authority; where much, perhaps the Palingenesie itself, is thought to be reposited.’
‘Has this invaluable man, so disliked by most of the opposing groups that disrupt our time, been taken away by some of their agents; or did he go voluntarily to their headquarters to discuss and confront them? We have at least some reason, even if it's just negative, to believe that the Lost is still alive; our grieving heart also hints that soon he will give a sign himself. Otherwise, indeed, his records must one day be opened by Authority; where much, perhaps even the Palingenesie itself, is believed to be stored.’
Thus far the Hofrath; who vanishes, as is his wont, too like an Ignis Fatuus, leaving the dark still darker.
Thus far the counselor; who disappears, as he usually does, too much like a will-o'-the-wisp, leaving the darkness even darker.
So that Teufelsdröckh’s public History were not done, then, or reduced to an even, unromantic tenor; nay, perhaps the better part thereof were only beginning? We stand in a region of conjectures, where substance has melted into shadow, and one cannot be distinguished from the other. May Time, which solves or suppresses all problems, throw glad light on this also! Our own private conjecture, now amounting 224almost to certainty, is that, safe-moored in some stillest obscurity, not to lie always still, Teufelsdröckh is actually in London!
So, Teufelsdröckh’s public story isn’t finished yet, or it’s not just a straightforward, dull tale; maybe the best parts are just getting started? We’re in a realm of guesses, where reality has blended into shadows, and it's hard to tell one from the other. May Time, which resolves or hides all issues, shine a light on this too! Our own theory, now almost certain, is that, safely anchored in some quiet obscurity but not meant to stay hidden, Teufelsdröckh is actually in London!
Here, however, can the present Editor, with an ambrosial joy as of over-weariness falling into sleep, lay down his pen. Well does he know, if human testimony be worth aught, that to innumerable British readers likewise, this is a satisfying consummation; that innumerable British readers consider him, during these current months, but as an uneasy interruption to their ways of thought and digestion; and indicate so much, not without a certain irritancy and even spoken invective. For which, as for other mercies, ought not he to thank the Upper Powers? To one and all of you, O irritated readers, he, with outstretched arms and open heart, will wave a kind farewell. Thou too, miraculous Entity, who namest thyself Yorke and Oliver, and with thy vivacities and genialities, with thy all-too Irish mirth and madness, and odour of palled punch, makest such strange work, farewell; long as thou canst, fare-well! Have we not, in the course of Eternity, travelled some months of our Life-journey in partial sight of one another; have we not existed together, though in a state of quarrel?
Here, however, the current Editor can, with a blissful joy reminiscent of falling asleep after being overly tired, put down his pen. He knows well, if human testimony means anything, that for countless British readers, this is a satisfying conclusion; that many British readers see him, during these recent months, as just an annoying interruption to their thoughts and digestion; and they express this annoyance, sometimes with irritation and even spoken insults. For this, as for other blessings, shouldn't he be grateful to the Higher Powers? To all of you, oh irritated readers, he will wave a warm farewell with open arms and an open heart. And you too, remarkable Being, who calls yourself Yorke and Oliver, with your liveliness and charm, your all-too-Irish humor and chaos, and the scent of stale punch, make such strange matters, goodbye; as long as you can, fare-well! Haven't we, throughout Eternity, traveled some months of our Life-journey in partial view of each other? Haven't we existed together, even while being at odds?
APPENDIX
TESTIMONIES OF AUTHORS
AUTHOR TESTIMONIALS
226 This questionable little Book was undoubtedly written among the mountain solitudes, in 1831; but, owing to impediments natural and accidental, could not, for seven years more, appear as a Volume in England;—and had at last to clip itself in pieces, and be content to struggle out, bit by bit, in some courageous Magazine that offered. Whereby now, to certain idly curious readers, and even to myself till I make study, the insignificant but at last irritating question, What its real history and chronology are, is, if not insoluble, considerably involved in haze.
226 This questionable little book was definitely written in the mountains in 1831; however, due to various natural and accidental obstacles, it couldn't be published as a complete volume in England for another seven years. Eventually, it was split into parts and was released gradually in some bold magazine willing to publish it. As a result, for some curious readers, and even for me until I studied it, the minor but ultimately frustrating question of its true history and timeline is, if not unsolvable, quite complicated and unclear.
To the first English Edition, 1838, which an American, or two American had now opened the way for, there was slightingly prefixed, under the title ‘Testimonies of Authors,’ some straggle of real documents, which, now that I find it again, sets the matter into clear light and sequence;—and shall here, for removal of idle stumbling-blocks and nugatory guessings from the path of every reader, be reprinted as it stood. (Author’s Note of 1868.)
For the first English Edition in 1838, which was brought about by an American or two, there was a somewhat dismissive introduction titled ‘Testimonies of Authors,’ containing a few actual documents that, seeing them again now, put everything into clear perspective and order;—and I will reprint it here as it was, to remove any pointless obstacles and unnecessary speculations for every reader. (Author’s Note of 1868.)
TESTIMONIES OF AUTHORS
I. Highest Class, Bookseller’s Taster
I. Premium Class, Bookseller’s Taster
Taster to Bookseller.—“The Author of Teufelsdröckh is a person of talent; his work displays here and there some felicity of thought and expression, considerable fancy and knowledge: but whether or not it would take with the public seems doubtful. For a jeu d’esprit of that kind it is too long; it would have suited better as an essay or article than as a volume. The Author has no great tact; his wit is frequently heavy; and reminds one of the German Baron who took to leaping on tables, and answered that he was learning to be lively. Is the work a translation?”
Taster to Bookseller.—“The author of Teufelsdröckh is talented; their work shows some bright moments of thought and expression, along with a good amount of imagination and knowledge. However, it’s unclear whether it would appeal to the public. For a jeu d’esprit like this, it's too long; it would work better as an essay or article rather than a whole book. The author lacks finesse; their humor often falls flat and reminds me of the German Baron who used to jump on tables, claiming he was trying to be more lively. Is the work a translation?”
Bookseller to Editor.—“Allow me to say that such a writer requires only a little more tact to produce a popular as well as an able work. Directly on receiving your permission, I sent your MS. to a gentleman in the highest class of men of letters, and an accomplished German scholar: I now inclose you his opinion, which, you may rely upon it, is a just one; and I have too high an opinion of your good sense to” &c. &c.—MS. (penes nos), London, 17th September 1831.
Bookseller to Editor.—“Let me say that this writer just needs a bit more finesse to create a work that is both popular and skillful. As soon as I received your permission, I sent your MS. to a distinguished gentleman in the literary world, who is also an accomplished German scholar. I'm now including his feedback, which you can trust is accurate; and I have too much faith in your good judgment to” & etc. & etc.—MS. (penes nos), London, 17th September 1831.
II. Critic of the Sun
II. Sun Critic
“Fraser’s Magazine exhibits the usual brilliancy, and also the” &c. “Sartor Resartus is what old Dennis used to call ‘a heap of clotted nonsense,’ mixed however, here and there, with passages marked by thought and striking poetic vigour. But what does the writer mean by ‘Baphometic fire-baptism’? Why cannot he lay aside his pedantry, and write so as to make himself generally intelligible? We quote by way of curiosity a sentence from the Sartor Resartus; which may be read either backwards or forwards, for it is equally intelligible either way. Indeed, by beginning at the tail, and so working up to the head, we think the reader will stand the fairest chance of getting at its meaning: ‘The fire-baptised soul, long so scathed and thunder-riven, here feels its own freedom; which feeling is its Baphometic baptism: the citadel of its whole kingdom it has thus gained by assault, and will keep inexpugnable; outwards from which the remaining dominions, not indeed without hard battering, will doubtless by degrees be conquered and pacificated.’ Here is a”—….—Sun Newspaper, 1st April 1834.
“Fraser’s Magazine shines brightly, and also the” &c. “Sartor Resartus is what old Dennis used to call ‘a pile of clotted nonsense,’ mixed, however, with some passages that show thought and impressive poetic strength. But what does the writer mean by ‘Baphometic fire-baptism’? Why can’t he drop his pretentiousness and write in a way that everyone can understand? We quote, out of curiosity, a sentence from Sartor Resartus; which can be read either backwards or forwards, as it makes sense either way. In fact, if you start at the end and work your way to the beginning, we think the reader will have the best chance of grasping its meaning: ‘The fire-baptised soul, long so burned and struck by lightning, here feels its own freedom; which feeling is its Baphometic baptism: the fortress of its entire kingdom it has thus captured by force, and will keep it safe; from here, the rest of its dominions, though not without a tough fight, will surely be gradually conquered and brought to peace.’ Here is a”—….—Sun Newspaper, 1st April 1834.
III. North-American Reviewer
III. North American Reviewer
… “After a careful survey of the whole ground, our belief is that no such persons as Professor Teufelsdröckh or Counsellor Heuschrecke ever existed; that the six Paper-bags, with their China-ink 228inscriptions and multifarious contents, are a mere figment of the brain; that the ‘present Editor’ is the only person who has ever written upon the Philosophy of Clothes; and that the Sartor Resartus is the only treatise that has yet appeared upon that subject;—in short, that the whole account of the origin of the work before us, which the supposed Editor relates with so much gravity, and of which we have given a brief abstract, is, in plain English, a hum.
… “After thoroughly examining the entire situation, we believe that neither Professor Teufelsdröckh nor Counsellor Heuschrecke ever existed; that the six Paper-bags, with their China-ink 228 inscriptions and various contents, are simply a product of imagination; that the ‘current Editor’ is the only person who has ever written about the Philosophy of Clothes; and that the Sartor Resartus is the only work that has been published on that topic;—in short, that the entire story of the origin of the work in front of us, which the supposed Editor shares with such seriousness, and which we have summarized briefly, is, to put it plainly, a hum.
“Without troubling our readers at any great length with our reasons for entertaining these suspicions, we may remark, that the absence of all other information on the subject, except what is contained in the work, is itself a fact of a most significant character. The whole German press, as well as the particular one where the work purports to have been printed, seems to be under the control of Stillschweigen and Co.,—Silence and Company. If the Clothes-Philosophy and its author are making so great a sensation throughout Germany as is pretended, how happens it that the only notice we have of the fact is contained in a few numbers of a monthly Magazine published at London? How happens it that no intelligence about the matter has come out directly to this country? We pique ourselves here in New England upon knowing at least as much of what is going on in the literary way in the old Dutch Mother-land as our brethren of the fast-anchored Isle; but thus far we have no tidings whatever of the ‘extensive close-printed close-meditated volume,’ which forms the subject of this pretended commentary. Again, we would respectfully inquire of the ‘present Editor’ upon what part of the map of Germany we are to look for the city of Weissnichtwo,—‘Know-not-where,’—at which place the work is supposed to have been printed, and the Author to have resided. It has been our fortune to visit several portions of the German territory, and to examine pretty carefully, at different times and for various purposes, maps of the whole; but we have no recollection of any such place. We suspect that the city of Know-not-where might be called, with at least as much propriety, Nobody-knows-where, and is to be found in the kingdom of Nowhere. Again, the village of Entepfuhl—‘Duck-pond,’ where the supposed Author of the work is said to have passed his youth, and that of Hinterschlag, where he had his education, are equally foreign to our geography. Duck-ponds enough there undoubtedly are in almost every village in Germany, as the traveller in that country knows too well to his cost, but any particular village denominated Duck-pond is to us altogether terra incognita. The names of the personages are not less singular than those of the places. Who can refrain from a smile at the yoking together of such a pair of appellatives as Diogenes Teufelsdröckh? The supposed bearer of this strange title is represented as admitting, in his pretended autobiography, that ‘he had searched to no purpose through all the Heralds’ books in and without the German empire, and through all manner of Subscribers’-lists, Militia-rolls, and other Name-catalogues,’ but had nowhere been able to find the ‘name Teufelsdröckh, except as appended to his own person.’ We can readily believe this, and we doubt very much whether any Christian parent would think of condemning a son to carry through life the burden of so unpleasant a title. That of Counsellor Heuschrecke—‘Grasshopper,’ though not offensive, looks much more like a piece of fancy work than a ‘fair business 229transaction.’ The same may be said of Blumine—‘Flower-Goddess’—the heroine of the fable; and so of the rest.
“Without bothering our readers too much with our reasons for having these doubts, we can point out that the lack of any other information on the subject, apart from what's in this work, is itself a significant fact. The entire German press, along with the specific one where the work is claimed to have been printed, appears to be under the influence of Stillschweigen and Co. — Silence and Company. If the Clothes-Philosophy and its author are really causing such a stir throughout Germany as claimed, why is it that the only mention we have of this is in a few issues of a monthly magazine published in London? Why has no news about this reached us directly in this country? We pride ourselves here in New England on knowing at least as much about what’s happening in the literary scene in the old Dutch Motherland as our counterparts from the well-established Isle; yet so far we have no information at all about the ‘extensive close-printed close-meditated volume’ that is the subject of this supposed commentary. Again, we would respectfully ask the ‘current Editor’ where on the map of Germany we should look for the city of Weissnichtwo—‘Know-not-where’—where the work is supposed to have been printed and where the Author is said to have lived. We have had the opportunity to visit several areas of Germany and have carefully examined maps of the whole country at different times and for various reasons, but we cannot recall any such place. We suspect that the city of Know-not-where could be just as appropriately called Nobody-knows-where and might be located in the kingdom of Nowhere. Furthermore, the village of Entepfuhl—‘Duck-pond,’ where the supposed Author of the work is said to have spent his youth, and Hinterschlag, where he received his education, are equally missing from our geography. There are certainly plenty of duck-ponds in almost every village in Germany, as any traveler to that country can attest to his dismay, but any specific village called Duck-pond is completely terra incognita to us. The names of the characters are just as unusual as those of the places. Who can help but smile at the pairing of such peculiar names as Diogenes Teufelsdröckh? The person supposedly holding this strange title is depicted as stating in his supposed autobiography that ‘he had searched in vain through all the Heralds’ books inside and outside the German empire, as well as through all sorts of Subscribers’ lists, Militia rolls, and other name catalogues,’ but he was unable to find the name Teufelsdröckh anywhere outside of his own existence. We can easily believe this, and we seriously doubt whether any Christian parent would consider giving their son the burden of such an unpleasant name. The name Counsellor Heuschrecke—‘Grasshopper,’ while not offensive, seems much more like a whimsical creation rather than a ‘fair business 229 transaction.’ The same can be said for Blumine—‘Flower-Goddess’—the heroine of the story; and this applies to the others as well.”
“In short, our private opinion is, as we have remarked, that the whole story of a correspondence with Germany, a university of Nobody-knows-where, a Professor of Things in General, a Counsellor Grasshopper, a Flower-Goddess Blumine, and so forth, has about as much foundation in truth as the late entertaining account of Sir John Herschel’s discoveries in the moon. Fictions of this kind are, however, not uncommon, and ought not, perhaps, to be condemned with too much severity; but we are not sure that we can exercise the same indulgence in regard to the attempt, which seems to be made to mislead the public as to the substance of the work before us, and its pretended German original. Both purport, as we have seen, to be upon the subject of Clothes, or dress. Clothes, their Origin and Influence, is the title of the supposed German treatise of Professor Teufelsdröckh, and the rather odd name of Sartor Resartus—the Tailor Patched,—which the present Editor has affixed to his pretended commentary, seems to look the same way. But though there is a good deal of remark throughout the work in a half-serious, half-comic style upon dress, it seems to be in reality a treatise upon the great science of Things in General, which Teufelsdröckh is supposed to have professed at the university of Nobody-knows-where. Now, without intending to adopt a too rigid standard of morals, we own that we doubt a little the propriety of offering to the public a treatise on Things in General, under the name and in the form of an Essay on Dress. For ourselves, advanced as we unfortunately are in the journey of life, far beyond the period when dress is practically a matter of interest, we have no hesitation in saying, that the real subject of the work is to us more attractive than the ostensible one. But this is probably not the case with the mass of readers. To the younger portion of the community, which constitutes everywhere the very great majority, the subject of dress is one of intense and paramount importance. An author who treats it appeals, like the poet, to the young men and maidens—virginibus puerisque,—and calls upon them, by all the motives which habitually operate most strongly upon their feelings, to buy his book. When, after opening their purses for this purpose, they have carried home the work in triumph, expecting to find in it some particular instruction in regard to the tying of their neckcloths, or the cut of their corsets, and meet with nothing better than a dissertation on Things in General, they will,—to use the mildest term—not be in very good humour. If the last improvements in legislation, which we have made in this country, should have found their way to England, the author, we think, would stand some chance of being Lynched. Whether his object in this piece of supercherie be merely pecuniary profit, or whether he takes a malicious pleasure in quizzing the Dandies, we shall not undertake to say. In the latter part of the work, he devotes a separate chapter to this class of persons, from the tenour of which we should be disposed to conclude, that he would consider any mode of divesting them of their property very much in the nature of a spoiling of the Egyptians.
“In short, our private opinion is, as we've mentioned, that the entire story about a correspondence with Germany, a university from nowhere, a Professor of Everything, a Counselor Grasshopper, a Flower-Goddess Blumine, and so on, has about as much truth to it as the recent entertaining tales of Sir John Herschel’s discoveries on the moon. Such fictions aren’t uncommon and perhaps shouldn’t be condemned too harshly; however, we’re not sure we can extend the same leniency toward the apparent attempt to mislead the public regarding the substance of the work before us and its alleged German original. Both claim, as we’ve seen, to be about Clothes or dress. Clothes, their Origin and Influence is the title of the supposed German treatise by Professor Teufelsdröckh, and the rather peculiar name Sartor Resartus—the Tailor Patched—which the current Editor has given to his so-called commentary, seems to imply the same thing. Yet, while there’s plenty of commentary throughout the work in a half-serious, half-comic tone about dress, it truly seems to be a treatise on the broader science of Things in General, which Teufelsdröckh is said to have taught at the university from nowhere. Now, without meaning to apply a too-strict moral standard, we admit we have some doubt about the appropriateness of presenting to the public a treatise on Things in General disguised as an essay on Dress. For ourselves, advanced as we are in life, far beyond the point when dress is a practical concern, we can confidently say the true subject of the work is more appealing to us than the supposed one. But this is likely not the case for the majority of readers. To the younger segment of society, which constitutes a significant majority everywhere, the subject of dress is of intense importance. An author who addresses this topic appeals, like the poet, to young men and women—virginibus puerisque—calling on them, with all the motivations that strongly affect their feelings, to purchase his book. When, after opening their wallets for this purpose, they take the book home, expecting specific guidance on tying their neckties or the design of their corsets, only to find a dissertation on Things in General instead, they will—using the mildest term—be quite displeased. If the latest legal improvements we’ve
“The only thing about the work, tending to prove that it is what it purports to be, a commentary on a real German treatise, is the style, which is a sort of Babylonish dialect, not destitute, it is true, of 230richness, vigour, and at times a sort of singular felicity of expression, but very strongly tinged throughout with the peculiar idiom of the German language. This quality in the style, however, may be a mere result of a great familiarity with German literature, and we cannot, therefore, look upon it as in itself decisive, still less as outweighing so much evidence of an opposite character.”—North-American Review, No. 89, October 1835.
“The only aspect of the work that suggests it genuinely is what it claims to be, a commentary on an actual German treatise, is its style, which resembles a kind of mixed dialect. Although it does have a certain richness, energy, and occasionally a unique charm in its expression, it is heavily influenced by the peculiar idioms of the German language. However, this stylistic quality might just stem from a deep familiarity with German literature, so we cannot consider it definitive on its own, much less outweigh all the evidence suggesting otherwise.”—North-American Review, No. 89, October 1835.
IV. New England Editors
New England Editors
“The Editors have been induced, by the express desire of many persons, to collect the following sheets out of the ephemeral pamphlets** Fraser’s (London) Magazine, 1833-4. in which they first appeared, under the conviction that they contain in themselves the assurance of a longer date.
“The Editors have been encouraged, by the clear request of many individuals, to gather the following sheets from the temporary pamphletsSure! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize.* Fraser's (London) Magazine, 1833-4. in which they first appeared, believing that they have the potential for a longer lifespan.”
“The Editors have no expectation that this little Work will have a sudden and general popularity. They will not undertake, as there is no need, to justify the gay costume in which the Author delights to dress his thoughts, or the German idioms with which he has sportively sprinkled his pages. It is his humour to advance the gravest speculations upon the gravest topics in a quaint and burlesque style. If his masquerade offend any of his audience, to that degree that they will not hear what he has to say, it may chance to draw others to listen to his wisdom; and what work of imagination can hope to please all? But we will venture to remark that the distaste excited by these peculiarities in some readers is greatest at first, and is soon forgotten; and that the foreign dress and aspect of the Work are quite superficial, and cover a genuine Saxon heart. We believe, no book has been published for many years, written in a more sincere style of idiomatic English, or which discovers an equal mastery over all the riches of the language. The Author makes ample amends for the occasional eccentricity of his genius, not only by frequent bursts of pure splendour, but by the wit and sense which never fail him.
“The Editors don’t expect this little work to become suddenly popular. They don’t feel the need to explain the colorful style the Author uses to express his thoughts or the German phrases he playfully includes throughout his pages. It’s his humor to tackle serious subjects in a quirky and humorous way. If his playful style offends some readers to the point where they refuse to engage with his ideas, it might instead attract others who appreciate his insights; after all, what imaginative work can please everyone? However, we’d like to point out that the initial dislike some readers have for these quirks tends to fade quickly, and the foreign style of the work is just a surface layer, hiding a genuine Saxon heart. We believe no book has been published in years that is written in such a sincere style of idiomatic English or shows such mastery over the richness of the language. The Author compensates for the occasional oddity of his genius not only with frequent moments of pure brilliance but also with the wit and sense that are always present.”
“But what will chiefly commend the Book to the discerning reader is the manifest design of the work, which is, a Criticism upon the Spirit of the Age,—we had almost said, of the hour,—in which we live; exhibiting in the most just and novel light the present aspects of Religion, Politics, Literature, Arts, and Social Life. Under all his gaiety the Writer has an earnest meaning, and discovers an insight into the manifold wants and tendencies of human nature, which is very rare among our popular authors. The philanthropy and the purity of moral sentiment, which inspire the work, will find their way to the heart of every lover of virtue.”—Preface to Sartor Resartus: Boston, 1836, 1837.
“But what will mainly appeal to the thoughtful reader is the obvious purpose of the book, which is a critique of the Spirit of the Age—we might even say, of the moment—in which we live; presenting the current perspectives on Religion, Politics, Literature, Arts, and Social Life in a fresh and accurate way. Beneath all his humor, the writer has a serious message and reveals an understanding of the diverse needs and inclinations of human nature, which is quite rare among popular authors. The compassion and the clarity of moral sentiment that inspire this work will resonate with every person who values virtue.” —Preface to Sartor Resartus: Boston, 1836, 1837.
Sunt, Fuerunt vel Fuere.
They are, were, or have been.
London, 30th June 1838.
London, June 30, 1838.
SUMMARY
BOOK I
Chap. I. Preliminary
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Initial
No Philosophy of Clothes yet, notwithstanding all our Science. Strangely forgotten that Man is by nature a naked animal. The English mind all-too practically absorbed for any such inquiry. Not so, deep-thinking Germany. Advantage of Speculation having free course. Editor receives from Professor Teufelsdröckh his new Work on Clothes (p. 1).
No Philosophy of Clothes yet, despite all our Science. Strangely overlooked that humans are by nature a naked species. The English mindset is too practical for such inquiries. Not so for deep-thinking Germany. They benefit from the freedom of speculation. The editor receives a new work on clothes from Professor Teufelsdröckh (p. 1).
Chap. II. Editorial Difficulties
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Editing Challenges
How to make known Teufelsdröckh and his Book to English readers; especially such a book? Editor receives from the Hofrath Heuschrecke a letter promising Biographic Documents. Negotiations with Oliver Yorke. Sartor Resartus conceived. Editor’s assurances and advice to his British reader (p. 5).
How to introduce Teufelsdröckh and his book to English readers; especially such a book? The editor gets a letter from Hofrath Heuschrecke promising biographical documents. Talks with Oliver Yorke. Sartor Resartus is conceived. The editor shares reassurances and advice with his British reader (p. 5).
Chap. III. Reminiscences
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Memories
Teufelsdröckh at Weissnichtwo. Professor of Things in General at the University there: Outward aspect and character; memorable coffee-house utterances; domicile and watch-tower: Sights thence of City-life by day and by night; with reflections thereon. Old ’Liza and her ways. Character of Hofrath Heuschrecke, and his relation to Teufelsdröckh (p. 9).
Teufelsdröckh at Weissnichtwo. Professor of General Knowledge at the University there: His appearance and personality; noteworthy coffee-house remarks; home and lookout: Views of city life during the day and night; with thoughts on it. Old 'Liza and her habits. The character of Hofrath Heuschrecke and his connection to Teufelsdröckh (p. 9).
Chap. IV. Characteristics
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Features
Teufelsdröckh and his Work on Clothes: Strange freedom of speech: transcendentalism; force of insight and expression; multifarious learning: Style poetic, uncouth: Comprehensiveness of his humour and moral feeling. How the Editor once saw him laugh. Different kinds of Laughter and their significance (p. 20).
Teufelsdröckh and his Work on Clothes: Odd freedom of speech: transcendentalism; power of insight and expression; diverse knowledge: Style is poetic, rough: Broadness of his humor and moral sense. How the Editor once witnessed him laugh. Various types of laughter and their meaning (p. 20).
Chap. V. The World in Clothes
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Fashion Around the World
Futile cause-and-effect Philosophies. Teufelsdröckh’s Orbis Vestitus. Clothes first invented for the sake of Ornament. Picture of our progenitor, the Aboriginal Savage. Wonders of growth and progress in mankind’s history. Man defined as a Tool-using Animal (p. 25).
Futile cause-and-effect philosophies. Teufelsdröckh’s Orbis Vestitus. Clothes were first created for decoration. Image of our ancestor, the original savage. Marvels of growth and progress in human history. Man defined as a tool-using animal (p. 25).
Chap. VI. Aprons
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Aprons
Divers Aprons in the world with divers uses. The Military and Police Establishment Society’s working Apron. The Episcopal Apron with its corner tucked in. The Laystall. Journalists now our only Kings and Clergy (p. 31).
Divers aprons around the world have different uses. The working apron of the Military and Police Establishment Society. The Episcopal apron with its corner tucked in. The Laystall. Journalists are now our only kings and clergy (p. 31).
232Chap. VII. Miscellaneous-Historical
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Miscellaneous-Historical
How Men and Fashions come and go. German Costume in the fifteenth century. By what strange chances do we live in History! The costume of Bolivar’s Cavalry (p. 34).
How Men and Trends come and go. German Fashion in the fifteenth century. What strange twists of fate shape our place in History! The outfit of Bolivar’s Cavalry (p. 34).
Chap. VIII. The World out of Clothes
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ The Naked World
Teufelsdröckh’s Theorem, “Society founded upon Cloth”; his Method, Intuition quickened by Experience.—The mysterious question, Who am I? Philosophic systems, all at fault: A deeper meditation has always taught, here and there an individual, that all visible things are appearances only; but also emblems and revelations of God. Teufelsdröckh first comes upon the question of Clothes: Baseness to which Clothing may bring us (p. 37).
Teufelsdröckh’s Theorem, “Society based on Clothing”; his Method, Intuition enhanced by Experience.—The mysterious question, Who am I? Philosophical systems, all missing the mark: A deeper reflection has always revealed to some individuals that all visible things are merely appearances; but also symbols and manifestations of God. Teufelsdröckh first encounters the question of Clothing: The degradation to which Clothing can lead us (p. 37).
Chap. IX. Adamatism
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Adamatism
The universal utility of Clothes, and their higher mystic virtue, illustrated. Conception of Mankind stripped naked; and immediate consequent dissolution of civilised Society (p. 43).
The overall usefulness of clothes and their deeper mystical significance are explained. The idea of humanity without clothing; and the direct result being the collapse of civilized society (p. 43).
Chap. X. Pure Reason
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Clear Thinking
A Naked World possible, nay actually exists, under the clothed one. Man, in the eye of Pure Reason, a visible God’s Presence. The beginning of all wisdom, to look fixedly on Clothes till they become transparent. Wonder, the basis of Worship: Perennial in man. Modern Sciolists who cannot wonder: Teufelsdröckh’s contempt for, and advice to them (p. 47).
A naked world is possible, and in fact, it exists beneath the clothed one. Man, in the eyes of Pure Reason, is a visible presence of God. The beginning of all wisdom is to gaze intently at clothes until they become transparent. Wonder is the foundation of worship: it's something that endures in humanity. Modern know-it-alls who lack the ability to wonder receive Teufelsdröckh’s disdain and advice (p. 47).
Chap. XI. Prospective
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Future
Nature not an Aggregate, but a Whole. All visible things are emblems, Clothes; and exist for a time only. The grand scope of the Philosophy of Clothes.—Biographic Documents arrive. Letter from Heuschrecke on the importance of Biography. Heterogeneous character of the documents: Editor sorely perplexed; but desperately grapples with his work (p. 52).
Nature is not just a collection of parts, but a complete entity. Everything we can see is a symbol, like clothing; these things only exist for a limited time. The broad theme of the Philosophy of Clothing. Biographical documents come in. A letter from Heuschrecke emphasizes the value of biography. The documents are diverse, leaving the editor in a tough spot; he struggles but is determined to tackle his work (p. 52).
BOOK II
Chap. I Genesis
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Genesis
Old Andreas Futteral and Gretchen his wife: their quiet home. Advent of a mysterious stranger, who deposits with them a young infant, the future Herr Diogenes Teufelsdröckh. After-yearnings of the youth for his unknown Father. Sovereign power of Names and Naming. Diogenes a flourishing Infant (p. 61).
Old Andreas Futteral and his wife Gretchen: their peaceful home. A mysterious stranger arrives and leaves them a young baby, the future Herr Diogenes Teufelsdröckh. After much longing, the youth yearns for his unknown father. The incredible power of names and naming. Diogenes is a thriving infant (p. 61).
Chap. II Idyllic
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Perfect
Happy Childhood! Entepfuhl: Sights, hearings and experiences of the boy Teufelsdröckh; their manifold teaching. Education; what 233it can do, what cannot. Obedience our universal duty and destiny. Gneschen sees the good Gretchen pray (p. 68).
Happy Childhood! Entepfuhl: The sights, sounds, and experiences of the boy Teufelsdröckh; their many lessons. Education; what it can achieve, what it can't. Obedience is our universal duty and destiny. Gneschen sees the good Gretchen pray (p. 68).
Chap. III Pedagogy
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Teaching methods
Teufelsdröckh’s School. His Education. How the ever-flowing Kuhbach speaks of Time and Eternity. The Hinterschlag Gymnasium; rude Boys; and pedant Professors. The need of true Teachers, and their due recognition. Father Andreas dies: and Teufelsdröckh learns the secret of his birth: His reflections thereon. The Nameless University. Statistics of Imposture much wanted. Bitter fruits of Rationalism: Teufelsdröckh’s religious difficulties. The young Englishman Herr Towgood. Modern Friendship (p. 76).
Teufelsdröckh’s School. His Education. How the ever-flowing Kuhbach talks about Time and Eternity. The Hinterschlag Gymnasium; rowdy Boys; and pretentious Professors. The need for true Teachers and the acknowledgment they deserve. Father Andreas passes away: and Teufelsdröckh discovers the secret of his birth: His thoughts about it. The Nameless University. Statistics on Deception are much needed. The bitter outcomes of Rationalism: Teufelsdröckh’s struggles with faith. The young Englishman Herr Towgood. Modern Friendship (p. 76).
Chap. IV Getting under Way
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Getting Started
The grand thaumaturgic Art of Thought. Difficulty in fitting Capability to Opportunity, or of getting underway. The advantage of Hunger and Bread-Studies. Teufelsdröckh has to enact the stern mono-drama of No object and no rest. Sufferings as Auscultator. Given up as a man of genius, Zähdarm House. Intolerable presumption of young men. Irony and its consequences. Teufelsdröckh’s Epitaph on Count Zähdarm (p. 90).
The grand magical art of thinking. Struggling to match Capability with Opportunity, or to get started. The benefit of Hunger and Study. Teufelsdröckh has to perform the harsh solo-drama of No object and no rest. Suffering as a Listener. Written off as a genius, Zähdarm House. Unbearable arrogance of young men. Irony and its effects. Teufelsdröckh’s Epitaph on Count Zähdarm (p. 90).
Chap. V Romance
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Love Stories
Teufelsdröckh gives up his Profession. The heavenly mystery of Love. Teufelsdröckh’s feeling of worship towards women. First and only love. Blumine. Happy hearts and free tongues. The infinite nature of Fantasy. Love’s joyful progress; sudden dissolution; and final catastrophe (p. 101).
Teufelsdröckh quits his job. The divine mystery of Love. Teufelsdröckh’s admiration for women. First and only love. Blumine. Happy hearts and free speech. The limitless nature of Fantasy. Love’s joyful journey; sudden breakdown; and ultimate disaster (p. 101).
Chap. VI Sorrows of Teufelsdröckh
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Teufelsdröckh's Sorrows
Teufelsdröckh’s demeanour thereupon. Turns pilgrim. A last wistful look on native Entepfuhl: Sunset amongst primitive Mountains. Basilisk-glance of the Barouche-and-four. Thoughts on View-hunting. Wanderings and Sorrowings (p. 112).
Teufelsdröckh’s attitude then changes. He becomes a pilgrim. A final nostalgic glance at his hometown, Entepfuhl: sunset among the rugged mountains. A fierce gaze at the carriage and horses. Thoughts about seeking adventure. Wanders and sorrows (p. 112).
Chap. VII The Everlasting No
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ The Eternal No
Loss of Hope, and of Belief. Profit-and-Loss Philosophy, Teufelsdröckh in his darkness and despair still clings to Truth and follows Duty. Inexpressible pains and fears of Unbelief. Fever-crisis: Protest against the Everlasting No: Baphometic Fire-baptism (p. 121).
Loss of Hope, and of Belief. Profit-and-Loss Philosophy, Teufelsdröckh in his darkness and despair still clings to Truth and follows Duty. Inexpressible pains and fears of Unbelief. Fever-crisis: Protest against the Everlasting No: Baphometic Fire-baptism (p. 121).
Chap. VIII Centre of Indifference
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Center of Apathy
Teufelsdröckh turns now outwardly to the Not-me; and finds wholesomer food. Ancient Cities: Mystery of their origin and growth: Invisible inheritances and possessions. Power and virtue of a true Book. Wagram Battlefield: War. Great Scenes beheld by the Pilgrim: Great Events, and Great Men. Napoleon, a divine missionary, preaching La carrière ouverte aux talens. Teufelsdröckh at the North Cape: Modern means of self-defence. Gunpowder and duelling. The Pilgrim, despising his miseries, reaches the Centre of Indifference (p. 128).
Teufelsdröckh now looks outward to the Not-me and finds more nourishing ideas. Ancient Cities: The mystery of their origins and developments: Invisible inheritances and possessions. The power and virtue of a true Book. Wagram Battlefield: War. Great scenes witnessed by the Pilgrim: Great events and Great Men. Napoleon, a divine missionary, preaching La carrière ouverte aux talens. Teufelsdröckh at the North Cape: Modern means of self-defense. Gunpowder and dueling. The Pilgrim, disregarding his struggles, reaches the Center of Indifference (p. 128).
234Chap. IX The Everlasting Yea
The Eternal Yes
Temptations in the Wilderness: Victory over the Tempter. Annihilation of Self. Belief in God, and love to Man. The origin of Evil, a problem ever requiring to be solved anew: Teufelsdröckh’s solution. Love of Happiness a vain whim: A Higher in man than Love of Happiness. The Everlasting Yea. Worship of Sorrow. Voltaire: his task now finished. Conviction worthless, impossible, without Conduct. The true Ideal, the Actual: Up and work! (p. 138).
Temptations in the Wilderness: Victory over the Tempter. Elimination of Self. Faith in God and love for Humanity. The root of Evil, a problem that always needs to be addressed again: Teufelsdröckh’s solution. The Pursuit of Happiness is a futile desire: There’s something greater in humans than the Pursuit of Happiness. The Everlasting Yes. Embracing Sorrow. Voltaire: his mission now complete. Belief is worthless and impossible without Action. The true Ideal is the Actual: Get up and work! (p. 138).
Chap. X Pause
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Stop
Conversion; a spiritual attainment peculiar to the modern Era. Teufelsdröckh accepts Authorship as his divine calling. The scope of the command Thou shalt not steal.—Editor begins to suspect the authenticity of the Biographical documents; and abandons them for the great Clothes volume. Result of the preceding ten Chapters: Insight into the character of Teufelsdröckh: His fundamental beliefs, and how he was forced to seek and find them (p. 149).
Conversion; a spiritual achievement unique to the modern era. Teufelsdröckh embraces authorship as his divine purpose. The meaning of the command Thou shalt not steal.—The editor starts to doubt the authenticity of the biographical documents and decides to focus on the major work about clothes. Outcome of the previous ten chapters: Understanding of Teufelsdröckh's character: His core beliefs and how he was compelled to seek and discover them (p. 149).
BOOK III
Chap. I Incident in Modern History
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Event in Recent History
Story of George Fox the Quaker; and his perennial suit of Leather. A man God-possessed, witnessing for spiritual freedom and manhood (p. 156).
Story of George Fox the Quaker; and his everlasting leather suit. A man filled with the spirit, advocating for spiritual freedom and human dignity (p. 156).
Chap. II Church-Clothes
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Church Outfits
Church-Clothes defined; the Forms under which the Religious principle is temporarily embodied. Outward Religion originates by Society: Society becomes possible by Religion. The condition of Church-Clothes in our time (p. 161).
Church-Clothes defined; the ways in which the religious principle is temporarily represented. Outward religion comes from society: society is made possible by religion. The state of Church-Clothes in our time (p. 161).
Chap. III Symbols
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Icons
The benignant efficacies of Silence and Secrecy. Symbols; revelations of the Infinite in the Finite: Man everywhere encompassed by them; lives and works by them. Theory of Motive-millwrights, a false account of human nature. Symbols of an extrinsic value; as Banners, Standards: Of intrinsic value; as Works of Art, Lives and Deaths of Heroic men. Religious Symbols; Christianity. Symbols hallowed by Time; but finally defaced and desecrated. Many superannuated Symbols in our time, needing removal (p. 163).
The positive effects of Silence and Secrecy. Symbols; revelations of the Infinite in the Finite: Man surrounded by them everywhere; lives and works through them. The Theory of Motive-millwrights is a misleading account of human nature. Symbols with external value; like Banners, Standards: With internal value; such as Works of Art, Lives and Deaths of Heroic individuals. Religious Symbols; Christianity. Symbols respected over time; but ultimately tarnished and disrespected. Many outdated Symbols in our time, needing removal (p. 163).
Chap. IV Helotage
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Helotage
Heuschrecke’s Malthusian Tract, and Teufelsdröckh’s marginal notes thereon. The true workman, for daily bread, or spiritual bread, to be honoured; and no other. The real privation of the Poor not poverty or toil, but ignorance. Over-population: With a world like ours and wide as ours, can there be too many men? Emigration (p. 170).
Heuschrecke’s Malthusian Tract and Teufelsdröckh’s notes on it. The true worker, whether for daily bread or spiritual nourishment, deserves respect—and no one else. The real hardship faced by the poor isn’t poverty or hard work, but ignorance. Overpopulation: In a world as vast as ours, can there really be too many people? Emigration (p. 170).
235Chap. V The Phœnix
The Phoenix
Teufelsdröckh considers Society as dead; its soul (Religion) gone, its body (existing Institutions) going. Utilitarianism, needing little farther preaching, is now in full activity of Destruction.—Teufelsdröckh would yield to the Inevitable, accounting that the best: Assurance of a fairer Living Society, arising, Phœnix-like, out of the ruins of the old dead one. Before that Phœnix death-birth is accomplished, long time, struggle, and suffering must intervene (p. 174).
Teufelsdröckh sees society as dead; its spirit (Religion) has vanished, and its structure (existing Institutions) is deteriorating. Utilitarianism, which needs little more explanation, is now fully engaged in destruction. Teufelsdröckh would accept the inevitable, believing that it’s for the best: the promise of a better living society rising, like a phoenix, from the ashes of the old dead one. Before that phoenix can be reborn, a long time filled with struggle and suffering must come first (p. 174).
Chap. VI Old Clothes
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Used Clothes
Courtesy due from all men to all men: The Body of Man a Revelation in the Flesh. Teufelsdröckh’s respect for Old Clothes, as the ‘Ghosts of Life.’ Walk in Monmouth Street, and meditations there (p. 179).
Courtesy owed from everyone to everyone: The Human Body a Revelation in the Flesh. Teufelsdröckh’s respect for Old Clothes, as the ‘Ghosts of Life.’ Walk in Monmouth Street, and reflections there (p. 179).
Chap. VII Organic Filaments
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Organic Fibers
Destruction and Creation ever proceed together; and organic filaments of the Future are even now spinning. Wonderful connection of each man with all men; and of each generation with all generations, before and after: Mankind is One. Sequence and progress of all human work, whether of creation or destruction, from age to age.—Titles, hitherto derived from Fighting, must give way to others. Kings will remain and their title. Political Freedom, not to be attained by any mechanical contrivance. Hero-worship, perennial amongst men; the cornerstone of polities in the Future. Organic filaments of the New Religion: Newspapers and Literature. Let the faithful soul take courage! (p. 183).
Destruction and creation always happen together; and the building blocks of the future are already being formed. There’s an amazing connection between each person and everyone else, and between each generation and all those that came before and will come after: Humanity is one. The sequence and progress of all human efforts, whether in creation or destruction, unfold from age to age. Titles that were once based on fighting must give way to new ones. Kings will stay, along with their titles. Political freedom can’t be achieved through any mechanical device. Hero-worship is a constant among people; it's the foundation of future societies. The building blocks of the new religion: newspapers and literature. Let the devoted soul find strength! (p. 183).
Chap. VIII Natural Supernaturalism
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Natural Supernaturalism
Deep significance of Miracles. Littleness of human Science: Divine incomprehensibility of Nature. Custom blinds us to the miraculousness of daily-recurring miracles; so do Names. Space and Time, appearances only; forms of human Thought: A glimpse of Immortality. How Space hides from us the wondrousness of our commonest powers; and Time, the divinely miraculous course of human history (p. 191).
Deep significance of miracles. The limitations of human science: the divine mystery of nature. Custom prevents us from seeing the miraculous nature of the everyday miracles that happen around us; names do this too. Space and time are just superficial appearances, created by human thought: a glimpse of immortality. Space conceals the wonder of our most ordinary abilities; and time obscures the divinely miraculous journey of human history (p. 191).
Chap. IX Circumspective
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Thoughtful
Recapitulation. Editor congratulates the few British readers who have accompanied Teufelsdröckh through all his speculations. The true use of the Sartor Resartus, to exhibit the Wonder of daily life and common things; and to show that all Forms are but Clothes, and temporary. Practical inferences enough will follow (p. 201).
Recap. The editor congratulates the few British readers who have followed Teufelsdröckh through all his ideas. The real purpose of the Sartor Resartus is to highlight the wonder of everyday life and ordinary things; to demonstrate that all forms are just clothes and temporary. There will be many practical conclusions to come (p. 201).
Chap. X The Dandiacal Body
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ The Dandiacal Body
The Dandy defined. The Dandiacal Sect a new modification of the primeval superstition Self-worship: How to be distinguished. Their Sacred Books (Fashionable Novels) unreadable. Dandyism’s Articles of Faith.—Brotherhood of Poor-Slaves: vowed to perpetual Poverty; worshippers of Earth; distinguished by peculiar costume and diet. 236Picture of a Poor-Slave Household; and of a Dandiacal. Teufelsdröckh fears these two Sects may spread, till they part all England between them, and then frightfully collide (p. 204).
The Dandy defined. The Dandiacal Sect is a new twist on the ancient belief in self-worship: how to stand out. Their Sacred Books (Fashionable Novels) are unreadable. Dandyism’s Articles of Faith.—Brotherhood of Poor-Slaves: committed to lifelong poverty; worshippers of the Earth; recognized by their unique clothing and diet. 236Image of a Poor-Slave Household; and of a Dandiacal. Teufelsdröckh fears these two Sects may spread, dividing all of England between them, and then clash in a terrifying way (p. 204).
Chap. XI Tailors
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Tailors
Injustice done to Tailors, actual and metaphorical. Their rights and great services will one day be duly recognised (p. 216).
Injustice done to Tailors, both literally and figuratively. Their rights and significant contributions will eventually be properly acknowledged (p. 216).
Chap. XII Farewell
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Goodbye
Teufelsdröckh’s strange manner of speech, but resolute, truthful character: His purpose seemingly to proselytise, to unite the wakeful earnest in these dark times. Letter from Hofrath Heuschrecke announcing that Teufelsdröckh has disappeared from Weissnichtwo. Editor guesses he will appear again, Friendly Farewell (p. 219).
Teufelsdröckh's odd way of speaking, but determined, honest nature: His goal seems to be to convert others, to bring together those who are alert and sincere during these troubled times. A letter from Hofrath Heuschrecke announces that Teufelsdröckh has vanished from Weissnichtwo. The editor thinks he will show up again, Friendly Farewell (p. 219).
ON HEROES, HERO-WORSHIP, AND THE HEROIC IN HISTORY
LECTURE I
Lecture 1
THE HERO AS DIVINITY. ODIN. PAGANISM: SCANDINAVIAN MYTHOLOGY
[Tuesday, 5th May 1840]
[Tuesday, May 5, 1840]
We have undertaken to discourse here for a little on Great Men, their manner of appearance in our world’s business, how they have shaped themselves in the world’s history, what ideas men formed of them, what work they did;—on Heroes, namely, and on their reception and performance; what I call Hero-worship and the Heroic in human affairs. Too evidently this is a large topic; deserving quite other treatment than we can expect to give it at present. A large topic; indeed, an illimitable one; wide as Universal History itself. For, as I take it, Universal History, the history of what man has accomplished in this world, is at bottom the History of the Great Men who have worked here. They were the leaders of men, these great ones; the modellers, patterns, and in a wide sense creators, of whatsoever the general mass of men contrived to do or to attain; all things that we see standing accomplished in the world are properly the outer material result, the practical realisation and embodiment, of Thoughts that dwelt in the Great Men sent into the world: the soul of the whole world’s history, it may justly be considered, were the history of these. Too clearly it is a topic we shall do no justice to in this place!
We are going to talk a bit about Great Men, their roles in the world’s affairs, how they have influenced history, the perceptions people had of them, and the work they accomplished;—specifically, on Heroes and their impact and reception; what I refer to as Hero-worship and the Heroic in human affairs. Clearly, this is a vast subject; it deserves a treatment far more extensive than what we can provide here. It’s indeed an immense topic, as broad as Universal History itself. Because, as I see it, Universal History—the account of what humanity has achieved in this world—is fundamentally the history of the Great Men who have shaped it. These great figures were the leaders; the models, examples, and in a broader sense, the creators, of everything the general population has achieved or aimed for; all the accomplishments we see in the world are essentially the tangible outcomes, the practical realization and embodiment of the ideas that lived in these Great Men sent into the world: the essence of the entire history of humankind could rightly be said to revolve around their stories. It's obvious that we won’t do this topic justice in this context!
One comfort is, that Great Men, taken up in any way, are profitable company. We cannot look, however imperfectly, upon a great man, without gaining something by him. He is the living light-fountain, which it is good and pleasant to be near. The light which enlightens, which has enlightened the darkness of the world; and this not as a kindled lamp only, but rather as a natural luminary shining by the gift of Heaven; a flowing light-fountain, as I say, of native original insight, of manhood and heroic nobleness;—in whose 240radiance all souls feel that it is well with them. On any terms whatsoever, you will not grudge to wander in such neighbourhood for a while. These Six classes of Heroes, chosen out of widely-distant countries and epochs, and in mere external figure differing altogether, ought, if we look faithfully at them, to illustrate several things for us. Could we see them well, we should get some glimpses into the very marrow of the world’s history. How happy, could I but, in any measure, in such times as these, make manifest to you the meanings of Heroism; the divine relation (for I may well call it such) which in all times unites a Great Man to other men; and thus, as it were, not exhaust my subject, but so much as break ground on it! At all events, I must make the attempt.
One comfort is that great people, in any form, are valuable company. We can't look, even imperfectly, at a great person without gaining something from them. They are like a living source of light, which is good and enjoyable to be around. The light that enlightens, that has illuminated the world's darkness; and this isn't just like a lit lamp, but more like a natural light source shining by divine gift; a flowing source of light, as I said, of genuine insight, manhood, and heroic nobility;—in whose radiance all souls feel at ease. No matter what, you wouldn't mind spending time in such company for a while. These six types of heroes, chosen from far-off countries and times, and differing greatly in appearance, should, if we look closely at them, illustrate several insights for us. If we could see them clearly, we would catch glimpses into the very essence of history. How wonderful it would be if I could, even a little, reveal to you the meanings of heroism; the divine connection (for I can rightly call it that) which has always linked a great person to others; and thus, not fully cover my topic, but at least start to explore it! In any case, I must make the effort.
It is well said, in every sense, that a man’s religion is the chief fact with regard to him. A man’s, or a nation of men’s. By religion I do not mean here the church-creed which he professes, the articles of faith which he will sign and, in words or otherwise, assert; not this wholly, in many cases not this at all. We see men of all kinds of professed creeds attain to almost all degrees of worth or worthlessness under each or any of them. This is not what I call religion, this profession and assertion; which is often only a profession and assertion from the outworks of the man, from the mere argumentative region of him, if even so deep as that. But the thing a man does practically believe (and this is often enough without asserting it even to himself, much less to others); the thing a man does practically lay to heart, and know for certain, concerning his vital relations to this mysterious Universe, and his duty and destiny there, that is in all cases the primary thing for him, and creatively determines all the rest. That is his religion; or it may be, his mere scepticism and no-religion: the manner it is in which he feels himself to be spiritually related to the Unseen World or No-World; and I say, if you tell me what that is, you tell me to a very great extent what the man is, what the kind of things he will do is. Of a man or of a nation we inquire, therefore, first of all, What religion 241they had? Was it Heathenism,—plurality of gods, mere sensuous representation of this Mystery of Life, and for chief recognised element therein Physical Force? Was it Christianism; faith in an Invisible, not as real only, but as the only reality; Time, through every meanest moment of it, resting on Eternity; Pagan empire of Force displaced by a nobler supremacy, that of Holiness? Was it Scepticism, uncertainty and inquiry whether there was an Unseen World, any Mystery of Life except a mad one;—doubt as to all this, or perhaps unbelief and flat denial? Answering of this question is giving us the soul of the history of the man or nation. The thoughts they had were the parents of the actions they did; their feelings were parents of their thoughts: it was the unseen and spiritual in them that determined the outward and actual;—their religion, as I say, was the great fact about them. In these Discourses, limited as we are, it will be good to direct our survey chiefly to that religious phasis of the matter. That once known well, all is known. We have chosen as the first Hero in our series, Odin the central figure of Scandinavian Paganism; an emblem to us of a most extensive province of things. Let us look for a little at the Hero as Divinity, the oldest primary form of Heroism.
It’s often said that a person’s religion is the most important thing about them. This applies to individuals and even to entire nations. When I refer to religion, I’m not just talking about the church doctrine they claim to follow or the beliefs they sign off on and assert, often just in words. We see people of all kinds of different beliefs achieve various levels of value or worthlessness within those frameworks. This is not what I mean by religion—this professing and asserting often only scratches the surface of who a person is, coming from their intellectual side, if it’s even that deep. What really matters is what a person actually believes in practice (and they often don’t even express this belief to themselves, much less to others); what they hold dear and know for sure about their essential relationship to this mysterious Universe and their duties and fate within it—this is always the primary thing that defines them and shapes everything else in their life. That is their religion, or it might simply be their skepticism and lack of religion; it’s about how they feel spiritually connected to the Unseen or to nothingness. If you tell me what that is, you’re revealing a lot about who that person is and what kind of things they will do. So, when we inquire about a person or a nation, we start by asking, what religion do they follow? Was it paganism, with its belief in many gods and a purely sensory understanding of Life’s Mystery, where physical force is the main recognized element? Was it Christianity, believing in an Invisible that is not just real but the only reality, with every minute of time resting on Eternity, and the empire of Force replaced by a greater empire of Holiness? Was it skepticism, filled with doubt and questioning whether there was an Unseen World or anything other than a chaotic Mystery of Life—doubting all of it or perhaps outright denying it? Answering this question tells us the essence of that person’s or nation’s history. Their thoughts shaped their actions; their feelings shaped their thoughts; it was the unseen and spiritual within them that influenced their outward reality—again, their religion was the pivotal fact about them. In these discussions, given our limitations, it’s best to focus our attention on this religious aspect of the subject. Once we understand that well, we will understand everything. We’ve chosen our first hero in this series, Odin, the central figure of Scandinavian Paganism; he represents a vast range of ideas. Let’s take a moment to explore the Hero as a Divine figure, the oldest form of heroism.
Surely it seems a very strange-looking thing this Paganism; almost inconceivable to us in these days. A bewildering, inextricable jungle of delusions, confusions, falsehoods and absurdities, covering the whole field of Life! A thing that fills us with astonishment, almost, if it were possible, with incredulity,—for truly it is not easy to understand that sane men could ever calmly, with their eyes open, believe and live by such a set of doctrines. That men should have worshipped their poor fellow-man as a God, and not him only, but stocks and stones, and all manner of animate and inanimate objects; and fashioned for themselves such a distracted chaos of hallucinations by way of Theory of the Universe: all this looks like an incredible fable. Nevertheless it is a clear fact that they did it. Such hideous inextricable jungle of misworships, misbeliefs, men, made as we are, did actually hold by, and live at 242home in. This is strange. Yes, we may pause in sorrow and silence over the depths of darkness that are in man; if we rejoice in the heights of purer vision he has attained to. Such things were and are in man; in all men; in us too.
Surely, it seems like a very strange thing, this Paganism; almost unimaginable to us these days. A confusing, tangled mess of delusions, confusions, falsehoods, and absurdities, covering the entire scope of Life! It astonishes us, almost making us incredulous, for it’s truly hard to believe that rational people could ever calmly, with their eyes open, believe in and live by such a set of doctrines. That people worshipped their fellow human beings as gods, not just them, but also trees and stones, and all sorts of living and non-living things; and created such a chaotic mess of hallucinations as their Theory of the Universe: all of this looks like an unbelievable story. Yet, it’s a clear fact that they did it. Such a hideous, tangled jungle of misguided worship and beliefs, people, just like us, actually upheld and lived within. This is strange. Yes, we may pause in sorrow and silence over the dark depths within humanity; even as we rejoice in the heights of clearer vision that he has achieved. Such things existed and still exist in humanity; in all people; in us too.
Some speculators have a short way of accounting for the Pagan religion: mere quackery, priestcraft, and dupery, say they; no sane man ever did believe it,—merely contrived to persuade other men, not worthy of the name of sane, to believe it! It will be often our duty to protest against this sort of hypothesis about men’s doings and history; and I here, on the very threshold, protest against it in reference to Paganism, and to all other isms by which man has ever for a length of time striven to walk in this world. They have all had a truth in them, or men would not have taken them up. Quackery and dupery do abound; in religions, above all in the more advanced decaying stages of religions, they have fearfully abounded: but quackery was never the originating influence in such things; it was not the health and life of such things, but their disease, the sure precursor of their being about to die! Let us never forget this. It seems to me a most mournful hypothesis, that of quackery giving birth to any faith even in savage men. Quackery gives birth to nothing; gives death to all things. We shall not see into the true heart of anything, or if we look merely at the quackeries of it; if we do not reject the quackeries altogether; as mere diseases, corruptions, with which our and all men’s sole duty is to have done with them, to sweep them out of our thoughts as out of our practice. Man everywhere is the born enemy of lies. I find Grand Lamaism itself to have a kind of truth in it. Read the candid, clear-sighted, rather sceptical Mr Turner’s Account of his Embassy to that country, and see. They have their belief, these poor Thibet people, that Providence sends down always an Incarnation of Himself into every generation. At bottom some belief in a kind of Pope! At bottom still better, belief that there is a Greatest Man; that he is discoverable; that, once discovered, we ought to treat him with an obedience which knows no bounds! This is the truth 243of Grand Lamaism; the ‘discoverability’ is the only error here. The Thibet priests have methods of their own of discovering what Man is Greatest, fit to be supreme over them. Bad methods: but are they so much worse than our methods,—of understanding him to be always the eldest born of a certain genealogy? Alas, it is a difficult thing to find good methods for!—We shall begin to have a chance of understanding Paganism, when we first admit that to its followers it was, at one time, earnestly true. Let us consider it very certain that men did believe in Paganism; men with open eyes, sound senses, men made altogether like ourselves; that we, had we been there, should have believed in it. Ask now, What Paganism could have been?
Some speculators have a simple way of explaining the Pagan religion: they call it just quackery, priestcraft, and trickery. They claim no rational person ever believed in it—it's just a scheme to convince others, who aren't even worthy of being called rational, to believe it! It's often important for us to challenge this kind of thinking about people's actions and history; and I want to challenge it right from the start when it comes to Paganism and all the other isms through which humans have tried to navigate this world over time. Each of these beliefs has contained some truth, or else people wouldn’t have embraced them. While quackery and deceit are certainly prevalent, especially in the more advanced stages of declining religions, they were never the driving force behind these beliefs; they didn’t bring health and vitality to them. Instead, they indicated that these beliefs were on the verge of dying! We must always keep this in mind. It seems to me a deeply sad notion that quackery could give rise to any form of belief, even among primitive people. Quackery doesn’t create anything; it destroys everything. If we focus solely on the fraudulent aspects, we won’t grasp the true essence of anything. We need to completely dismiss these frauds as mere illnesses, corruptions, from which our responsibility, and that of all people, is to move on, clearing them from our minds as well as our practices. Humanity is inherently opposed to lies. I find even Grand Lamaism has its own kind of truth. Take a look at the honest, perceptive, somewhat skeptical Mr. Turner’s Account of his Embassy to that country, and you'll see. The people of Tibet genuinely believe that Providence sends down an incarnation of itself in every generation. At its core, there’s some belief in a sort of Pope! Even more fundamentally, they believe that there is a Greatest Man who can be found; and once discovered, he should be treated with unwavering obedience! This is the truth of Grand Lamaism; the ‘discoverability’ is the only mistake here. The Tibetan priests have their own ways of determining who is the Greatest Man, fit to rule over them. Their methods might not be great, but are they really worse than our approach of believing he’s always the firstborn of a certain lineage? Unfortunately, finding good methods for this is quite tricky!—We’ll start to understand Paganism better once we accept that, for its followers, it was genuinely believed at one point. We should firmly believe that people did have faith in Paganism—people with clear minds, sound senses, just like us; if we had been there, we would have believed in it too. So, what could Paganism have been?
Another theory, somewhat more respectable, attributes such things to Allegory. It was a play of poetic minds, say these theorists; a shadowing-forth, in allegorical fable, in personification and visual form, of what such poetic minds had known and felt of this Universe. Which agrees, add they, with a primary law of human nature, still everywhere observably at work, though in less important things, That what a man feels intensely, he struggles to speak-out of him, to see represented before him in visual shape, and as if with a kind of life and historical reality in it. Now doubtless there is such a law, and it is one of the deepest in human nature; neither need we doubt that it did operate fundamentally in this business. The hypothesis which ascribes Paganism wholly or mostly to this agency, I call a little more respectable; but I cannot yet call it the true hypothesis. Think, would we believe, and take with us as our life-guidance, an allegory, a poetic sport? Not sport but earnest is what we should require. It is a most earnest thing to be alive in this world; to die is not sport for a man. Man’s life never was a sport to him; it was a stern reality, altogether a serious matter to be alive!
Another theory, which is somewhat more credible, attributes these things to Allegory. According to these theorists, it was a creation of imaginative minds; a representation, in allegorical stories, personifications, and visual forms, of what those imaginative minds knew and felt about this Universe. They argue that this aligns with a fundamental law of human nature, still clearly at work today, even in less significant matters, which is that when someone feels something deeply, they try to express it, to see it represented before them in a tangible form, as if it has its own life and historical reality. There is indeed such a law, and it is one of the most profound aspects of human nature; we can also agree that it played a significant role in this discussion. The idea that Paganism is entirely or mostly due to this explanation is, in my view, a bit more respectable; however, I still can't call it the definitive explanation. Think about it, would we accept and carry forward an allegory, a mere poetic game, as guidance for our lives? It's not a game but sincerity that we should seek. Being alive in this world is a serious matter; death is not a game for anyone. Life has never been a game to humanity; it is a serious reality, an incredibly serious matter to be alive!
I find, therefore, that though these Allegory theorists are on the way towards truth in this matter, they have not reached it either. Pagan Religion is indeed an Allegory, a Symbol of what men felt and knew about 244the Universe; and all Religions are Symbols of that, altering always as that alters: but it seems to me a radical perversion, and even inversion, of the business, to put that forward as the origin and moving cause, when it was rather the result and termination. To get beautiful allegories, a perfect poetic symbol, was not the want of men; but to know what they were to believe about this Universe, what course they were to steer in it; what, in this mysterious Life of theirs, they had to hope and to fear, to do and to forbear doing. The Pilgrim’s Progress is an Allegory, and a beautiful, just and serious one: but consider whether Bunyan’s Allegory could have preceded the Faith it symbolises! The Faith had to be already there, standing believed by everybody;—of which the Allegory could then become a shadow; and, with all its seriousness, we may say a sportful shadow, a mere play of the Fancy, in comparison with that awful Fact and scientific certainty which it poetically strives to emblem. The Allegory is the product of the certainty, not the producer of it; not in Bunyan’s, nor in any other case. For Paganism, therefore, we have still to inquire, Whence came that scientific certainty, the parent of such a bewildered heap of allegories, errors and confusions? How was it, what was it?
I find that while these Allegory theorists are getting closer to the truth, they haven't quite reached it either. Pagan Religion is indeed an Allegory, a Symbol of what people felt and understood about the Universe; and all Religions are Symbols of that, constantly changing as that changes. But I believe it's a fundamental misunderstanding, even a reversal of the situation, to suggest that these are the origin and driving force when they are actually the result and conclusion. What people were looking for was not beautiful allegories or perfect poetic symbols; it was understanding what they should believe about this Universe, what path they should take within it; what, in this mysterious Life of theirs, they had to hope for and fear, what actions they should take and what they should refrain from doing. The Pilgrim’s Progress is an Allegory, and a beautiful, thoughtful, and serious one at that. But think about whether Bunyan’s Allegory could have come before the Faith it represents! The Faith had to already exist, being believed by everyone; then the Allegory could become a reflection of it. Despite its seriousness, we can say it is a playful shadow, just a light expression of the imagination, when compared to that profound reality and scientific certainty that it artistically attempts to represent. The Allegory is the outcome of that certainty, not its source; this holds true for Bunyan and for anyone else. So, for Paganism, we still need to ask: Where did that scientific certainty come from, the origin of such a confusing mix of allegories, errors, and misunderstandings? How did it arise, what was it?
Surely it were a foolish attempt to pretend ‘explaining,’ in this place, or in any place, such a phenomenon as that far-distant distracted cloudy imbroglio of Paganism,—more like a cloudfield than a distant continent of firm land and facts! It is no longer a reality, yet it was one. We ought to understand that this seeming cloudfield was once a reality; that not poetic allegory, least of all that dupery and deception was the origin of it. Men, I say, never did believe idle songs, never risked their soul’s life on allegories; men in all times, especially in early earnest times, have had an instinct for detecting quacks, for detesting quacks. Let us try if, leaving out both the quack theory and the allegory one, and listening with affectionate attention to that far-off confused rumour of the Pagan ages, we cannot ascertain so much as this at least, That there was a kind of fact at the heart of them; that they too were 245not mendacious and distracted, but in their own poor way true and sane!
Surely, it would be a foolish attempt to pretend to explain, in this place, or anywhere else, such a phenomenon as that distant, chaotic mix of Paganism—more like a field of clouds than a distant continent of solid land and facts! It’s no longer a reality, yet it once was. We need to understand that this seemingly cloudy field was once real; that poetic allegory, much less the trickery and deceit, was not its origin. I say, men never believed in idle songs, never risked their soul’s life on allegories; men throughout history, especially in earnest early times, have had an instinct for spotting frauds, for hating frauds. Let us see if, by leaving out both the fraudulent theory and the allegory, and listening with genuine attention to that distant confused rumor of the Pagan ages, we can at least determine this: that there was a kind of truth at the heart of them; that they too were 245not false and chaotic, but in their own flawed way, true and sane!
You remember that fancy of Plato’s, of a man who had grown to maturity in some dark distance, and was brought on a sudden into the upper air to see the sun rise. What would his wonder be, his rapt astonishment at the sight we daily witness with indifference! With the free open sense of a child, yet with the ripe faculty of a man, his whole heart would be kindled by that sight, he would discern it well to be Godlike, his soul would fall down in worship before it. Now, just such a childlike greatness was in the primitive nations. The first Pagan Thinker among rude men, the first man that began to think, was precisely this child-man of Plato’s. Simple, open as a child, yet with the depth and strength of a man. Nature had as yet no name to him; he had not yet united under a name the infinite variety of sights, sounds, shapes and motions, which we now collectively name Universe, Nature, or the like,—and so with a name dismiss it from us. To the wild deep-hearted man all was yet new, not veiled under names or formulas; it stood naked, flashing-in on him there, beautiful, awful, unspeakable. Nature was to this man, what to the Thinker and Prophet it forever is, preternatural. This green flowery rock-built earth, the trees, the mountains, rivers, many-sounding seas;—that great deep sea of azure that swims overhead; the winds sweeping through it; the black cloud fashioning itself together, now pouring out fire, now hail and rain; what is it? Ay, what? At bottom we do not yet know; we can never know at all. It is not by our superior insight that we escape the difficulty; it is by our superior levity, our inattention, our want of insight. It is by not thinking that we cease to wonder at it. Hardened round us, encasing wholly every notion we form, is a wrappage of traditions, hearsays, mere words. We call that fire of the black thundercloud ‘electricity,’ and lecture learnedly about it, and grind the like of it out of glass and silk: but what is it? What made it? Whence comes it? Whither goes it? Science has done much for us; but it is a poor science that would hide from us the great deep sacred infinitude of Nescience, whither we can never 246penetrate, on which all science swims as a mere superficial film. This world, after all our science and sciences, is still a miracle; wonderful, inscrutable, magical and more, to whosoever will think of it.
You remember Plato’s idea of a man who grew up in some dark place and was suddenly brought into the light to see the sunrise. Imagine his amazement, his awe at something we see every day without a second thought! With the innocent wonder of a child but the understanding of an adult, his heart would be set ablaze by that view, and he would recognize it as divine, submitting his soul in worship before it. Just like that childlike grandeur existed in early civilizations. The first philosopher among primitive people, the first person to start thinking, was exactly this child-man from Plato’s vision. Simple and open like a child, yet with the depth and strength of an adult. Nature didn’t have names for him yet; he hadn’t grouped the endless variety of sights, sounds, shapes, and movements we now refer to as the Universe or Nature, and thus dismissed them with a name. To that wild, passionate man, everything was still new, unfiltered by labels or formulas; it stood before him, raw and beautiful, terrifying yet indescribable. Nature was for this man what it forever is for the Thinker and Prophet: preternatural. This green, vibrant, rocky earth, the trees, mountains, rivers, and the many-sounding seas; that vast blue sky above, the winds blowing through it; the dark cloud forming, now unleashing fire, then hail and rain; what is it? Yes, what? Ultimately, we still don’t know; we can never truly know. It’s not our superior understanding that helps us avoid the confusion; rather, it’s our nonchalance, our distraction, our lack of insight. By not thinking about it, we stop being amazed. Surrounding us and completely encasing every idea we have is a shield of traditions, hearsay, mere words. We call the fire from the black thundercloud ‘electricity,’ and we lecture about it, creating it from glass and silk: but what is it? What created it? Where does it come from? Where is it going? Science has done a lot for us, but it’s a poor science that would keep us from recognizing the profound sacred mystery of Nescience, which we can never 246reach, and on which all science floats as just a thin layer. This world, despite all our science, is still a miracle; wonderful, enigmatic, magical, and more, for anyone willing to think about it.
That great mystery of Time, were there no other: the illimitable, silent, never-resting thing called Time, rolling, rushing on, swift, silent, like an all-embracing ocean-tide, on which we and all the Universe swim like exhalations, like apparitions which are, and then are not: this is forever very literally a miracle; a thing to strike us dumb,—for we have no word to speak about it. This Universe, ah me—what could the wild man know of it; what can we yet know? That it is a Force, and thousandfold Complexity of Forces; a Force which is not we. That is all; it is not we, it is altogether different from us. Force, Force, everywhere Force; we ourselves a mysterious Force in the centre of that. ‘There is not a leaf rotting on the highway but has Force in it: how else could it rot?’ Nay surely, to the Atheistic Thinker, if such a one were possible, it must be a miracle too, this huge illimitable whirlwind of Force, which envelops us here; never-resting whirlwind, high as Immensity, old as Eternity. What is it? God’s creation, the religious people answer; it is the Almighty God’s! Atheistic science babbles poorly of it, with scientific nomenclatures, experiments and what-not, as if it were a poor dead thing, to be bottled up in Leyden jars and sold over counters: but the natural sense of man, in all times, if he will honestly apply his sense, proclaims it to be a living thing,—ah, an unspeakable, godlike thing; towards which the best attitude for us, after never so much science, is awe, devout prostration and humility of soul; worship if not in words, then in silence.
That great mystery of Time, if nothing else: the endless, quiet, never-ending thing we call Time, rolling and rushing on, swift and silent, like an all-encompassing ocean tide, on which we and the entire Universe float like breath, like ghostly figures that are and then are not: this is literally a miracle; something that leaves us speechless—because we have no words to describe it. This Universe, oh my—what could a wild man understand about it? What do we even know? That it is a Force, a complex web of Forces; a Force that is not us. That’s all; it’s not us, it’s completely different from us. Force, Force, everywhere Force; we ourselves remain a mysterious Force at the center of it. ‘There isn’t a single leaf rotting on the road that doesn’t hold Force within it: how else could it decay?’ Surely, for the Atheistic Thinker, if such a person could exist, this massive, endless whirlwind of Force that surrounds us must also be a miracle; an unceasing whirlwind, as vast as Immensity, as ancient as Eternity. What is it? God’s creation, the religious say; it belongs to Almighty God! Atheistic science speaks poorly of it, using scientific jargon, experiments, and so on, as if it were just a lifeless thing to be trapped in Leyden jars and sold: but the natural sense of humanity, throughout history, if honestly applied, declares it to be a living thing—oh, an indescribable, godlike thing; and the most fitting response for us, even after studying so much science, is awe, devout reverence, and humility of spirit; to worship, if not in words, then in silence.
But now I remark farther: What in such a time as ours it requires a Prophet or Poet to teach us, namely, the stripping-off of those poor undevout wrappages, nomenclatures and scientific hearsays,—-this, the ancient earnest soul, as yet unencumbered with these things, did for itself. The world, which is now divine only to the gifted, was then divine to whosoever would turn his eye upon it. He stood bare before it face to face. ‘All 247was Godlike or God:’—Jean Paul still finds it so; the giant Jean Paul, who has power to escape out of hearsays: but there then were no hearsays. Canopus shining-down over the desert, with its blue diamond brightness (that wild blue spirit-like brightness, far brighter than we ever witness here), would pierce into the heart of the wild Ishmaelitish man, whom it was guiding through the solitary waste there. To his wild heart, with all feelings in it, with no speech for any feeling, it may seem a little eye, that Canopus, glancing-out on him from the great deep Eternity; revealing the inner Splendour to him. Cannot we understand how these men worshipped Canopus; became what we call Sabeans, worshipping the stars? Such is to me the secret of all forms of Paganism. Worship is transcendent wonder; wonder for which there is now no limit or measure; that is worship. To these primeval men, all things and everything they saw exist beside them were an emblem of the Godlike, of some God.
But now I notice something else: What it takes in our time to teach us, whether through a Prophet or a Poet, is the shedding of those poor, unspiritual coverings, labels, and scientific hearsay—this is something the ancient earnest soul, still free from these burdens, did for itself. The world, which now feels divine only to the few who possess the gift, was once divine to anyone willing to look at it. They stood before it, uncovered and direct. "Everything was Godlike or God:"—Jean Paul still sees it that way; the giant Jean Paul, who can escape the confines of hearsay: but back then, there were no hearsays. Canopus shining down over the desert, with its bright blue diamond light (that wild, spirit-like brightness, far brighter than anything we witness here), would pierce into the heart of the wild Ishmaelite man, whom it guided through the desolate wasteland. To his untamed heart, bursting with feelings and without words for any of them, Canopus may have seemed like a little eye, gazing at him from the vastness of Eternity; revealing the inner Splendor to him. Can we not understand how these men *worshipped* Canopus; became what we call Sabeans, worshippers of the stars? To me, this is the secret of all forms of Paganism. Worship is transcendent wonder; wonder that now has no boundary or measure; that is worship. To these ancient people, everything they saw existing beside them was a sign of the Godlike, of some God.
And look what perennial fibre of truth was in that. To us also, through every star, through every blade of grass, is not a God made visible, if we will open our minds and eyes? We do not worship in that way now: but is it not reckoned still a merit, proof of what we call a ‘poetic nature,’ that we recognise how every object has a divine beauty in it; how every object still verily is ‘a window through which we may look into Infinitude itself’? He that can discern the loveliness of things, we call him Poet, Painter, Man of Genius, gifted, lovable. These poor Sabeans did even what he does,—in their own fashion. That they did it, in what fashion soever, was a merit: better than what the entirely stupid man did, what the horse and camel did,—namely, nothing!
And look at the everlasting truth in that. To us too, through every star and every blade of grass, isn't there a God made visible, if we just open our minds and eyes? We don't worship like that anymore, but isn't it still considered a good thing, proof of what we call a ‘poetic nature,’ that we see the divine beauty in every object? How every single thing is truly ‘a window through which we can glimpse into Infinitude itself’? The one who can see the beauty in things, we call him a Poet, a Painter, a Person of Genius, gifted and lovable. These poor Sabeans did what he does—in their own way. The fact that they did it, in any way, was worth something: better than what the completely ignorant person did, what the horse and camel did—namely, nothing!
But now if all things whatsoever that we look upon are emblems to us of the Highest God, I add that more so than any of them is man such an emblem. You have heard of St. Chrysostom’s celebrated saying in reference to the Shekinah, or Ark of Testimony, visible Revelation of God, among the Hebrews: “The true Shekinah is Man!” Yes, it is even so: this is no vain phrase; it is veritably so. The essence of our being, the mystery in 248us that calls itself “I,”—ah, what words have we for such things?—is a breath of Heaven; the Highest Being reveals himself in man. This body, these faculties, this life of ours, is it not all as a vesture for that Unnamed? ‘There is but one Temple in the Universe,’ says the devout Novalis, ‘and that is the Body of Man. Nothing is holier than that high form. Bending before men is a reverence done to this Revelation in the Flesh. We touch Heaven when we lay our hand on a human body!’ This sounds much like a mere flourish of rhetoric; but it is not so. If well meditated, it will turn out to be a scientific fact; the expression, in such words as can be had, of the actual truth of the thing. We are the miracle of miracles,—the great inscrutable mystery of God. We cannot understand it, we know not how to speak of it; but we may feel and know, if we like, that it is verily so.
But now, if everything we see is a symbol of the Highest God, I’d say that more than anything else, man is the greatest symbol. You’ve heard about St. Chrysostom’s famous saying regarding the Shekinah, or the Ark of Testimony, which is the visible Revelation of God among the Hebrews: “The true Shekinah is Man!” Yes, that’s true: it’s not just a pretty phrase; it’s absolutely true. The essence of our existence, the mystery within us that identifies itself as “I”—ah, what words can capture that?—is a piece of Heaven; the Highest Being reveals himself in man. This body, these abilities, this life we have—isn’t it all just a garment for that Unnamed? ‘There is only one Temple in the Universe,’ says the devout Novalis, ‘and that is the Body of Man. Nothing is holier than that elevated form. Bowing before humans is an act of respect for this Revelation in the Flesh. We touch Heaven when we place our hand on a human body!’ This may sound like mere rhetoric, but it’s not. If considered deeply, it will prove to be a scientific fact; the expression, in whatever words we have, of the actual truth of the matter. We are the miracle of miracles—the great, unfathomable mystery of God. We can’t fully understand it, and we don’t know how to describe it; but we can feel and know, if we choose, that it is indeed so.
Well; these truths were once more readily felt than now. The young generations of the world, who had in them the freshness of young children, and yet the depth of earnest men, who did not think that they had finished-off all things in Heaven and Earth by merely giving them scientific names, but had to gaze direct at them there, with awe and wonder: they felt better what of divinity is in man and Nature;—they, without being mad, could worship Nature, and man more than anything else in Nature. Worship, that is, as I said above, admire without limit: this, in the full use of their faculties, with all sincerity of heart, they could do. I consider Hero-worship to be the grand modifying element in that ancient system of thought. What I called the perplexed jungle of Paganism sprang, we may say, out of many roots: every admiration, adoration of a star or natural object, was a root or fibre of a root; but Hero-worship is the deepest root of all; the tap-root, from which in a great degree all the rest were nourished and grown.
Well, these truths were once felt more readily than they are now. The young generations of the world, full of the freshness of children but also the depth of serious adults, didn’t think they had figured everything out in Heaven and Earth just by giving them scientific names. They needed to look directly at them, filled with awe and wonder: they understood better the divinity present in both humanity and Nature; they could, without being irrational, worship Nature and humanity more than anything else in Nature. Worship, as I mentioned earlier, means to admire without limits: this, in the full use of their abilities, with complete sincerity of heart, they could do. I believe that hero-worship is a significant modifying element in that ancient system of thought. The confused jungle of Paganism, as I called it, sprang from many roots: every admiration or adoration of a star or natural object was a root or a fiber of a root; but hero-worship is the deepest root of all—it's the tap-root from which, to a large extent, all the others were nourished and grew.
And now if worship even of a star had some meaning in it, how much more might that of a Hero! Worship of a Hero is transcendent admiration of a Great Man. I say great men are still admirable; I say there is, at bottom, nothing else admirable! No nobler feeling 249than this of admiration for one higher than himself dwells in the breast of man. It is to this hour, and at all hours, the vivifying influence in man’s life. Religion I find stand upon it; not Paganism only, but far higher and truer religions,—all religion hitherto known. Hero-worship, heartfelt prostrate admiration, submission, burning, boundless, for a noblest godlike Form of Man,—is not that the germ of Christianity itself? The greatest of all Heroes is One—whom we do not name here! Let sacred silence meditate that sacred matter; you will find it the ultimate perfection of a principle extant throughout man’s whole history on earth.
And now, if even worshiping a star has some significance to it, how much more could that of a Hero mean! Worship of a Hero is a deep admiration for a Great Man. I say great men are still worthy of admiration; I say there is, at the core, nothing else that deserves admiration! No nobler feeling than this admiration for someone greater than oneself resides in a person's heart. It is, even now and always, the vital force in human life. I find that all religions, not just Paganism but also those that are much higher and truer, stand on this foundation. Hero-worship, genuine, profound admiration, submission, intense, limitless, for a noble godlike representation of Man—couldn't that be the root of Christianity itself? The greatest of all Heroes is One—whom we do not mention here! Let sacred silence reflect on that sacred topic; you will discover it to be the ultimate expression of a principle present throughout human history on earth.
Or coming into lower, less unspeakable provinces, is not all Loyalty akin to religious Faith also? Faith is loyalty to some inspired Teacher, some spiritual Hero. And what therefore is loyalty proper, the life-breath of all society, but an effluence of Hero-worship, submissive admiration for the truly great? Society is founded on Hero-worship. All dignities of rank, on which human association rests, are what we may call a Heroarchy (Government of Heroes),—or a Hierarchy, for it is ‘sacred’ enough withal! The Duke means Dux, Leader; King is Kön-ning, Kan-ning, Man that knows or cans. Society everywhere is some representation, not insupportably inaccurate, of a graduated Worship of Heroes;—reverence and obedience done to men really great and wise. Not insupportably inaccurate, I say! They are all as bank-notes, these social dignitaries, all representing gold;—and several of them, alas, always are forged notes. We can do with some forged false notes; with a good many even; but not with all, or the most of them forged! No: there have to come revolutions then; cries of Democracy, Liberty, and Equality, and I know not what:—the notes being all false, and no gold to be had for them, people take to crying in their despair that there is no gold, that there never was any!—‘Gold,’ Hero-worship, is nevertheless, as it was always and everywhere, and cannot cease till man himself ceases.
Or when we enter lower, less unspeakable areas, isn't all loyalty similar to religious faith? Faith is loyalty to some inspired teacher or spiritual hero. So, what is true loyalty, the lifeblood of society, but a reflection of hero-worship, a humble admiration for the truly great? Society is built on hero-worship. All the ranks and statuses that human relationships depend on can be seen as a Heroarchy (the Government of Heroes),—or a Hierarchy, because it's sacred enough! The word Duke means Dux, Leader; King comes from Kön-ning, Kan-ning, meaning the man who knows or can. Society everywhere is a representation, not unbearably inaccurate, of a graduated worship of heroes;—reverence and obedience given to genuinely great and wise individuals. Not unbearably inaccurate, I maintain! These social dignitaries are all like banknotes, representing gold;—and sadly, several of them are forged notes. We can tolerate some forged false notes, quite a few even; but not if most of them are forged! No: revolutions must occur then; cries for democracy, liberty, and equality, and who knows what else:—when all the notes are fake and there's no gold to back them, people begin to cry out in despair that there’s no gold, that there never was any!—‘Gold,’ hero-worship, is, as it has always been everywhere, and cannot cease until humanity itself ceases.
I am well aware that in these days Hero-worship, the thing I call Hero-worship, professes to have gone out, and finally ceased. This, for reasons which it will be 250worth while some time to inquire into, is an age that as it were denies the existence of great men; denies the desirableness of great men. Show our critics a great man, a Luther for example, they begin to what they call ‘account’ for him; not to worship him, but take the dimensions of him,—and bring him out to be a little kind of man! He was the ‘creature of the Time,’ they say; the Time called him forth, the Time did everything, he nothing—but what we the little critic could have done too! This seems to me but melancholy work. The Time call forth? Alas, we have known Times call loudly enough for their great man; but not find him when they called! He was not there; Providence had not sent him; the Time, calling its loudest, had to go down to confusion and wreck because he would not come when called.
I know that nowadays, the idea of Hero-worship—what I call Hero-worship—seems to have faded away completely. For reasons worth exploring, we live in a time that, in a way, denies the existence of great individuals; it denies the value of great individuals. When we show our critics a great man, like Luther for instance, they start what they call 'explaining' him; they don’t worship him but instead try to reduce him to a small, ordinary person! They say he was a product of his time; that his time brought him forth, that time did everything, while he did nothing that we, the small critics, couldn't have done too! This feels to me like a sad task. The Time called forth? Unfortunately, we've seen Times call out loudly enough for their great man but not find him when they called! He wasn’t there; Providence didn’t send him; the Time, calling out its loudest, ended up in chaos and ruin because he wouldn’t come when called.
For if we will think of it, no Time need have gone to ruin, could it have found a man great enough, a man wise and good enough: wisdom to discern truly what the Time wanted, valour to lead it on the right road thither; these are the salvation of any Time. But I liken common languid Times, with their unbelief, distress, perplexity, with their languid doubting characters and embarrassed circumstances, impotently crumbling-down into ever worse distress towards final ruin;—all this I liken to dry dead fuel, waiting for the lightning out of Heaven that shall kindle it. The great man, with his free force direct out of God’s own hand, is the lightning. His word is the wise healing word which all can believe in. All blazes round him now, when he has once struck on it, into fire like his own. The dry mouldering sticks are thought to have called him forth. They did want him greatly; but as to calling him forth—!—Those are critics of small vision, I think, who cry: “See, is it not the sticks that made the fire?” No sadder proof can be given by a man of his own littleness than disbelief in great men. There is no sadder symptom of a generation than such general blindness to the spiritual lightning, with faith only in the heap of barren dead fuel. It is the last consummation of unbelief. In all epochs of the world’s history, we shall find the Great Man to have been the indispensable 251saviour of his epoch;—the lightning, without which the fuel never would have burnt. The History of the World, I said already, was the Biography of Great Men.
For if we think about it, no time needs to be wasted if it has found a person who is great enough, wise and good enough; wisdom to truly understand what the time needs, courage to guide it in the right direction—these are the keys to saving any era. I compare ordinary, sluggish times, with their disbelief, distress, confusion, and their hesitant, troubled characters and situations, hopelessly falling apart into even worse distress towards eventual ruin;—all this I compare to dry, dead fuel, waiting for the lightning from Heaven to ignite it. The great person, with their direct strength from God's own hand, is the lightning. Their words are the wise, healing words that everyone can believe in. Everything lights up around them once they ignite it into fire like their own. The dry, decaying sticks are thought to have summoned them. They truly needed him, but as for summoning him—!—Those who claim, “Look, isn’t it the sticks that created the fire?” are critics with a limited perspective, I believe. No sadder proof can be shown by a person of their own smallness than disbelief in great people. There is no sadder sign of a generation than such widespread blindness to the spiritual lightning, with only faith in a pile of barren dead fuel. It is the ultimate testament of doubt. Throughout all periods of the world’s history, we have found that the Great Man was the essential savior of their time;—the lightning, without which the fuel would never have burned. The History of the World, I said before, was the Biography of Great Men.
Such small critics do what they can to promote unbelief and universal spiritual paralysis; but happily they cannot always completely succeed. In all times it is possible for a man to arise great enough to feel that they and their doctrines are chimeras and cobwebs. And what is notable, in no time whatever can they entirely eradicate out of living men’s hearts a certain altogether peculiar reverence for Great Men; genuine admiration, loyalty, adoration, however dim and perverted it may be. Hero-worship endures for ever while man endures. Boswell venerates his Johnson, right truly even in the Eighteenth century. The unbelieving French believe in their Voltaire; and burst-out round him into very curious Hero-worship, in that last act of his life when they ‘stifle him under roses.’ It has always seemed to me extremely curious this of Voltaire. Truly, if Christianity be the highest instance of Hero-worship, then we may find here in Voltaireism one of the lowest! He whose life was that of a kind of Antichrist, does again on this side exhibit a curious contrast. No people ever were so little prone to admire at all as those French of Voltaire. Persiflage was the character of their whole mind; adoration had nowhere a place in it. Yet see! The old man of Ferney comes up to Paris; an old, tottering, infirm man of eighty-four years. They feel that he too is a kind of Hero; that he has spent his life in opposing error and injustice, delivering Calases, unmasking hypocrites in high places;—in short that he too, though in a strange way, has fought like a valiant man. They feel withal that, if persiflage be the great thing, there never was such a persifleur. He is the realised ideal of every one of them; the thing they are all wanting to be; of all Frenchmen the most French. He is properly their god,—such god as they are fit for. Accordingly all persons, from the Queen Antoinette to the Douanier at the Porte St. Denis, do they not worship him? People of quality disguise themselves as tavern-waiters. The Maître de Poste, with a broad oath, 252orders his Postillion, “Va bon train; thou art driving M. de Voltaire.” At Paris his carriage is ‘the nucleus of a comet, whose train fills whole streets.’ The ladies pluck a hair or two from his fur, to keep it as a sacred relic. There was nothing highest, beautifulest, noblest in all France, that did not feel this man to be higher, beautifuler, nobler.
Such minor critics do what they can to encourage disbelief and a general lack of spiritual vitality; but fortunately, they can't always fully succeed. Throughout history, there have been individuals strong enough to see that these critics and their beliefs are nothing but illusions and trivialities. Moreover, it's interesting that at no time can they completely wipe out a unique reverence for Great Individuals from people's hearts; genuine admiration, loyalty, and even adoration, however distorted it may be, persist. Hero-worship lasts as long as humanity does. Boswell truly admires his Johnson, even in the Eighteenth century. The skeptical French hold a belief in their Voltaire and express an intriguing kind of Hero-worship at the end of his life when they 'smother him with roses.' I've always found Voltaire's situation quite fascinating. If Christianity represents the peak of Hero-worship, then Voltaireism might be one of its lowest forms! He, whose life was almost that of an Antichrist, also shows an interesting contrast on this side. No group of people has been less inclined to admire than those French associated with Voltaire. Their entire mindset was characterized by sarcasm; there was no place for adoration. Yet, look! The old man from Ferney comes to Paris; an aging, frail man of eighty-four. They sense that he too is a kind of Hero, that he has dedicated his life to fighting error and injustice, defending the Calas family, exposing hypocrites in power; in short, that he too has fought valiantly, albeit in a unique manner. They also realize that if sarcasm is the main thing, there has never been a greater sarcastic figure than him. He embodies the aspiration of every one of them; he is what they all strive to be; the most quintessentially French of all Frenchmen. He is essentially their god—of the type they are suited for. Therefore, everyone, from Queen Antoinette to the toll collector at Porte St. Denis, doesn’t worship him? The elite disguise themselves as tavern workers. The Postmaster, with a hearty curse, commands his driver, “Go fast; you are driving Mr. Voltaire.” In Paris, his carriage becomes ‘the center of a comet, whose tail fills entire streets.’ Ladies pull a few hairs from his coat to keep as cherished relics. There was nothing highest, most beautiful, or noblest in all of France that didn’t recognize this man as higher, more beautiful, and nobler.
Yes, from Norse Odin to English Samuel Johnson, from the divine Founder of Christianity to the withered Pontiff of Encyclopedism, in all times and places, the Hero has been worshipped. It will ever be so. We all love great men; love, venerate, and bow down submissive before great men: nay can we honestly bow down to anything else? Ah, does not every true man feel that he is himself made higher by doing reverence to what is really above him? No nobler or more blessed feeling dwells in man’s heart. And to me it is very cheering to consider that no sceptical logic, or general triviality, insincerity and aridity of any Time and its influences can destroy this noble inborn loyalty and worship that is in man. In times of unbelief, which soon have to become times of revolution, much down-rushing, sorrowful decay and ruin is visible to everybody. For myself in these days, I seem to see in this indestructibility of Hero-worship the everlasting adamant lower than which the confused wreck of revolutionary things cannot fall. The confused wreck of things crumbling and even crashing and tumbling all round us in these revolutionary ages, will get down so far; no farther. It is an eternal corner-stone, from which they can begin to build themselves up again. That man, in some sense or other, worships Heroes; that we all of us reverence and must ever reverence Great Men: this is, to me, the living rock amid all rushings-down whatsoever;—the one fixed point in modern revolutionary history, otherwise as if bottomless and shoreless.
Yes, from Norse Odin to English Samuel Johnson, from the divine founder of Christianity to the frail Pope of Encyclopedism, throughout all times and places, the Hero has been revered. This will forever remain the case. We all admire great individuals; we love, respect, and humbly bow down before them: can we honestly show respect to anything else? Doesn’t every true person feel they are elevated by honoring what is genuinely greater than themselves? No nobler or more blessed feeling exists in a person's heart. For me, it’s very uplifting to think that no skeptical logic or general triviality, insincerity, or the dry influences of any era can erase this noble, innate loyalty and admiration found in people. In times of doubt, which inevitably turn into revolutionary times, the visible decline and deterioration are apparent to everyone. Personally, these days, I see in the unbreakable nature of Hero-worship the everlasting cornerstone below which the chaotic ruins of revolutionary events cannot descend. The chaotic wreckage of things collapsing around us in these turbulent times may fall so far; not any further. It is an eternal foundation from which they can begin to rebuild. That man, in one way or another, worships Heroes; that we all respect and must always respect Great Individuals: this is, for me, the solid rock amidst all the chaos;—the one fixed point in modern revolutionary history, which otherwise feels bottomless and infinite.
So much of truth, only under an ancient obsolete vesture, but the spirit of it still true, do I find in the Paganism of old nations. Nature is still divine, the revelation of the workings of God; the Hero is still worshipable: this, under poor cramped incipient forms, 253is what all Pagan religions have struggled, as they could, to set forth. I think Scandinavian Paganism, to us here, is more interesting than any other. It is, for one thing, the latest; it continued in these regions of Europe till the eleventh century: eight-hundred years ago the Norwegians were still worshippers of Odin. It is interesting also as the creed of our fathers; the men whose blood still runs in our veins, whom doubtless we still resemble in so many ways. Strange: they did believe that, while we believe so differently. Let us look a little at this poor Norse creed, for many reasons. We have tolerable means to do it; for there is another point of interest in these Scandinavian mythologies: that they have been preserved so well.
So much of the truth, only under an old, outdated guise, but the essence of it is still true, I find in the Paganism of ancient civilizations. Nature remains divine, revealing the workings of God; the Hero is still worthy of worship: this, in their limited and early forms, is what all Pagan religions have tried to express as best they could. I believe Scandinavian Paganism is more fascinating to us here than any other. For one thing, it’s the most recent; it persisted in these parts of Europe until the eleventh century: eight hundred years ago, the Norwegians were still worshiping Odin. It’s also interesting as the belief system of our ancestors; the people whose blood still flows in our veins, whom we surely still resemble in many ways. Strange: they believed that, while we believe so differently. Let’s take a closer look at this simple Norse belief system for numerous reasons. We have decent resources to do this; another interesting point about these Scandinavian mythologies is that they have been so well preserved.
In that strange island Iceland,—burst-up, the geologists say, by fire from the bottom of the sea; a wild land of barrenness and lava; swallowed many months of every year in black tempests, yet with a wild gleaming beauty in summer-time; towering up there, stern and grim, in the North Ocean; with its snow jokuls, roaring geysers, sulphur-pools and horrid volcanic chasms, like the waste chaotic battle-field of Frost and Fire;—where of all places we least looked for Literature or written memorials, the record of these things was written down. On the seaboard of this wild land is a rim of grassy country, where cattle can subsist, and men by means of them and of what the sea yields; and it seems they were poetic men these, men who had deep thoughts in them, and uttered musically their thoughts. Much would be lost, had Iceland not been burst-up from the sea, not been discovered by the Northmen! The old Norse Poets were many of them natives of Iceland.
In that strange island of Iceland, which geologists say was formed by fire from the sea floor; a wild land of desolation and lava; consumed for many months each year by fierce storms, yet possessing a wild, shining beauty in the summer; standing tall and stern in the North Atlantic, with its snow-capped glaciers, roaring geysers, sulfur pools, and terrifying volcanic chasms, like a chaotic battlefield of Frost and Fire;—where we least expected to find literature or written records, the history of these things was documented. Along the coast of this wild land is a strip of grassy terrain where cattle can graze, allowing people to survive through them and what the sea provides; and it seems these people were poetic, with deep thoughts that they expressed musically. Much would be lost if Iceland hadn’t risen from the sea, or if it hadn’t been discovered by the Norsemen! Many of the old Norse poets were native to Iceland.
Sæmund, one of the early Christian Priests there, who perhaps had a lingering fondness for Paganism, collected certain of their old Pagan songs, just about becoming obsolete then,—Poems or Chants of a mythic, prophetic, mostly all of a religious character: that is what Norse critics call the Elder or Poetic Edda. Edda, a word of uncertain etymology, is thought to signify Ancestress. Snorro Sturleson, an Iceland gentleman, an extremely notable personage, 254educated by this Sæmund’s grandson, took in hand next, near a century afterwards, to put together, among several other books he wrote, a kind of Prose Synopsis of the whole Mythology; elucidated by new fragments of traditionary verse. A work constructed really with great ingenuity, native talent, what one might call unconscious art; altogether a perspicuous clear work, pleasant reading still: this is the Younger or Prose Edda. By these and the numerous other Sagas, mostly Icelandic, with the commentaries, Icelandic or not, which go on zealously in the North to this day, it is possible to gain some direct insight even yet; and see that old Norse system of Belief, as it were, face to face. Let us forget that it is erroneous Religion; let us look at it as old Thought, and try if we cannot sympathise with it somewhat.
Sæmund, one of the early Christian priests there, who might have held onto some affection for Paganism, gathered a few of their old Pagan songs that were on the verge of fading away—poems or chants of a mythical, prophetic nature, mostly religious in character. This is what Norse critics call the Elder or Poetic Edda. The word Edda, whose origins are unclear, is thought to mean Ancestress. Snorro Sturleson, a notable figure from Iceland, who was educated by Sæmund’s grandson, later took it upon himself, nearly a century later, to compile a sort of prose summary of the entire mythology, enhanced by new fragments of traditional verse. This work was crafted with great skill and natural talent, what one might describe as unconscious artistry; it’s a clear, engaging piece that remains enjoyable to read: this is the Younger or Prose Edda. Through these and the many other Sagas, mostly from Iceland, along with commentaries from Iceland or elsewhere, which continue to thrive in the North to this day, it’s possible to still gain some direct insight and see the old Norse belief system up close. Let’s overlook that it is a flawed religion; let’s view it as ancient thought and see if we can find some common ground with it.
The primary characteristic of this old Northland Mythology I find to be Impersonation of the visible workings of Nature. Earnest simple recognition of the workings of Physical Nature, as a thing wholly miraculous, stupendous and divine. What we now lecture of as Science, they wondered at, and fell down in awe before, as Religion. The dark hostile powers of Nature they figure to themselves as ‘Jötuns,’ Giants, huge shaggy beings of a demonic character. Frost, Fire, Sea-tempest; these are Jötuns. The friendly powers again, as Summer-heat, the Sun, are Gods. The empire of this Universe is divided between these two; they dwell apart, in perennial internecine feud. The Gods dwell above in Asgard, the Garden of the Asen, or Divinities; Jötunheim, a distant dark chaotic land, is the home of the Jötuns.
The main feature of this old Northland mythology that I notice is the personification of the visible forces of nature. It's a genuine, straightforward acknowledgment of the workings of physical nature, seen as completely miraculous, impressive, and divine. What we now teach as science, they marveled at and worshiped as religion. The dark, hostile forces of nature they imagined as ‘Jötuns’, giants, giant shaggy beings with a demonic essence. Frost, fire, and sea storms; these are Jötuns. The friendly forces, like summer warmth and the sun, are gods. The realm of this universe is split between these two; they exist separately, in a constant internal conflict. The gods reside above in Asgard, the Garden of the Asen, or divinities; Jötunheim, a distant dark chaotic land, is the home of the Jötuns.
Curious all this; and not idle or inane, if we will look at the foundation of it! The power of Fire, or Flame, for instance, which we designate by some trivial chemical name, thereby hiding from ourselves the essential character of wonder that dwells in it as in all things, is with these old Northmen, Loke, a most swift subtle Demon, of the brood of the Jötuns. The savages of the Ladrones Islands too (say some Spanish voyagers) thought Fire, which they never had seen before, was a devil or god, that bit you sharply when you touched 255it, and that lived upon dry wood. From us too no Chemistry, if it had not Stupidity to help it, would hide that Flame is a wonder. What is Flame?—Frost the old Norse Seer discerns to be a monstrous hoary Jötun, the Giant Thrym, Hrym: or Rime, the old word now nearly obsolete here, but still used in Scotland to signify hoar-frost. Rime was not then as now a dead chemical thing, but a living Jötun or Devil; the monstrous Jötun Rime drove home his Horses at night, sat ‘combing their manes,’—which Horses were Hail-Clouds, or fleet Frost-Winds. His Cows—No, not his, but a kinsman’s, the Giant Hymir’s Cows are Icebergs: this Hymir ‘looks at the rocks’ with his devil-eye, and they split in the glance of it.
This is all quite interesting, and not trivial or pointless if we take a closer look! The power of Fire or Flame, for example, which we label with some simple chemical term, keeps us from recognizing the remarkable nature it holds, just like everything else. For these ancient Northmen, Loke is a quick and cunning Demon from the lineage of the Jötuns. Some Spanish explorers reported that the natives of the Ladrones Islands thought Fire—something they had never encountered before—was either a devil or a god, which would sting you sharply if you touched it and that it fed on dry wood. Without the aid of Stupidity, even Chemistry wouldn’t be able to disguise the fact that Flame is extraordinary. What is Flame? The ancient Norse Seer considers Frost to be a monstrous, gray Jötun, the Giant Thrym or Hrym: or Rime, an old term now almost forgotten here but still used in Scotland to refer to hoar-frost. Rime was not regarded back then as a mere dead chemical substance, but as a living Jötun or Devil; the monstrous Jötun Rime would bring his Horses home at night, which were the Hail-Clouds or swift Frost-Winds, and he would sit ‘combing their manes.’ His Cows—no, not his, but his relative’s, the Giant Hymir’s Cows—are Icebergs: this Hymir ‘gazes at the rocks’ with his devilish eye, and they split at his glance.
Thunder was not then mere Electricity, vitreous or resinous; it was the God Donner (Thunder) or Thor,—God also of beneficent Summer-heat. The thunder was his wrath; the gathering of the black clouds is the drawing down of Thor’s angry brows; the fire-bolt bursting out of Heaven is the all-rending Hammer flung from the hand of Thor: he urges his loud chariot over the mountain-tops,—that is the peal: wrathful he ‘blows in his red beard,’—that is the rustling storm-blast before the thunder begin. Balder again, the White God, the beautiful, the just and benignant (whom the early Christian Missionaries found to resemble Christ), is the Sun—beautifulest of visible things; wondrous too, and divine still, after all our Astronomies and Almanacs! But perhaps the notablest god we hear tell-of is one of whom Grimm the German Etymologist finds trace: the God Wünsch, or Wish. The God Wish; who could give us all that we wished! Is not this the sincerest yet rudest voice of the spirit of man? The rudest ideal that man ever formed; which still shows itself in the latest forms of our spiritual culture. Higher considerations have to teach us that the God Wish is not the true God.
Thunder was not just electricity, whether glassy or resinous; it was the God Donner (Thunder) or Thor—also the God of the gentle summer heat. The thunder represented his anger; the dark clouds gathering were like Thor frowning in rage; the lightning bolt coming down from the sky was his mighty hammer thrown from his hand: he drives his loud chariot over the mountain tops—that's the thunderclap. Angry, he "blows in his red beard"—that's the rustling storm before the thunder starts. Balder, the White God—beautiful, just, and kind (who early Christian missionaries said resembled Christ)—is the Sun, the most beautiful of visible things; still wondrous and divine, even after all our astronomy and almanacs! But perhaps the most notable god we hear about is one identified by Grimm, the German etymologist: the God Wünsch, or Wish. The God Wish, who could give us everything we wished! Isn't this the most genuine yet primitive expression of the human spirit? The most primitive ideal that humanity has ever created, which still appears in the latest forms of our spiritual beliefs. Higher insights have to show us that the God Wish is not the true God.
Of the other Gods or Jötuns I will mention only for etymology’s sake, that Sea-tempest is the Jötun Aegir, a very dangerous Jötun;—and now to this day, on our river Trent, as I learn, the Nottingham bargemen, when the River is in a certain flooded state (a kind of back-water, 256or eddying swirl it has, very dangerous to them), call it Eager; they cry out, “Have a care, there is the Eager coming!” Curious; that word surviving, like the peak of a submerged world! The oldest Nottingham bargemen had believed in the God Aegir. Indeed, our English blood too in good part is Danish, Norse; or rather, at bottom, Danish and Norse and Saxon have no distinction, except a superficial one,—as of Heathen and Christian, or the like. But all over our Island we are mingled largely with Danes proper,—from the incessant invasions there were: and this, of course, in a greater proportion along the east coast; and greatest of all, as I find, in the North Country. From the Humber upwards, all over Scotland, the Speech of the common people is still in a singular degree Icelandic; its Germanism has still a peculiar Norse tinge. They too are ‘Normans,’ Northmen,—if that be any great beauty!—
Of the other gods or giants, I will only mention one for the sake of etymology: Sea-tempest is the giant Aegir, a very dangerous being. Even today, on our river Trent, I’ve heard that the Nottingham barge operators, when the river floods in a certain way (it has a kind of backwater or eddy that is very hazardous for them), call it Eager; they shout, “Watch out, here comes the Eager!” It’s interesting that this word has survived, like the peak of a submerged world! The oldest Nottingham barge operators believed in the god Aegir. In fact, a significant part of our English heritage is Danish and Norse; or rather, at its core, Danish, Norse, and Saxon have no real distinction aside from a superficial one, like that of heathen and Christian, or something similar. But all over our island, we are largely mixed with proper Danes due to the constant invasions; this is, of course, more prominent along the east coast and greatest of all, as I’ve found, in the North. From the Humber northward, throughout Scotland, the everyday speech of the common people still has a strong Icelandic influence; its German roots still carry a distinct Norse flavor. They too are ‘Normans,’ Northmen—if that counts as a great compliment!
Of the chief god, Odin, we shall speak by and by. Mark at present so much; what the essence of Scandinavian and indeed of all Paganism is: a recognition of the forces of Nature as godlike, stupendous, personal Agencies,—as Gods and Demons. Not inconceivable to us. It is the infant Thought of man opening itself, with awe and wonder, on this ever-stupendous Universe. To me there is in the Norse System something very genuine, very great and manlike. A broad simplicity, rusticity, so very different from the light gracefulness of the old Greek Paganism, distinguishes this Scandinavian System. It is Thought; the genuine Thought of deep, rude, earnest minds, fairly opened to the things about them; a face-to-face and heart-to-heart inspection of the things,—the first characteristic of all good Thought in all times. Not graceful lightness, half-sport, as in the Greek Paganism; a certain homely truthfulness and rustic strength, a great rude sincerity, discloses itself here. It is strange, after our beautiful Apollo statues and clear smiling mythuses, to come down upon the Norse Gods ‘brewing ale’ to hold their feast with Aegir, the Sea-Jötun; sending out Thor to get the caldron for them in the Jötun country; Thor, after many adventures, clapping the Pot on his head, 257like a huge hat, and walking off with it,—quite lost in it, the ears of the Pot reaching down to his heels! A kind of vacant hugeness, large awkward gianthood, characterises that Norse System; enormous force, as yet altogether untutored, stalking helpless with large uncertain strides. Consider only their primary mythus of the Creation. The Gods, having got the Giant Ymer slain, a Giant made by ‘warm wind,’ and much confused work, out of the conflict of Frost and Fire,—determined on constructing a world with him. His blood made the sea; his flesh was the Land, the Rocks his bones; of his eyebrows they formed Asgard their Gods’-dwelling; his skull was the great blue vault of Immensity, and the brains of it became the Clouds. What a Hyper-Brobdignagian business! Untamed Thought, great, giantlike, enormous;—to be tamed in due time into the compact greatness, not giant-like, but godlike and stronger than gianthood, of the Shakspeares, the Goethes!—Spiritually as well as bodily these men are our progenitors.
We'll talk about the chief god, Odin, soon. For now, let's understand the essence of Scandinavian and all Paganism: it’s acknowledging the forces of Nature as divine, amazing, personal beings—gods and demons. This isn’t hard for us to grasp. It reflects the early thoughts of humanity, filled with awe and wonder, as they encounter this vast Universe. There’s something very genuine, significant, and human about the Norse System. It has a broad simplicity and a rustic feel that's quite different from the light elegance of ancient Greek Paganism. It represents true thinking—thought from deep, straightforward, earnest minds that are genuinely open to the world around them. It emphasizes a direct, heartfelt examination of things, which is key to all meaningful thought throughout history. Unlike the delicate lightness and playful spirit of Greek Paganism, this system reveals a certain honest simplicity and rustic strength, displaying a great raw sincerity. After enjoying our beautiful Apollo statues and clear, cheerful myths, it’s surprising to find the Norse gods “brewing ale” for a feast with Aegir, the Sea-Jötun; sending Thor to fetch the caldron from the land of the giants; and Thor, after many adventures, wearing the pot on his head like a huge hat, completely swallowed by it, with the pot's ears reaching down to his heels! There’s a kind of awkward enormity—a large, clumsy giant-like quality—characterizing that Norse System; immense strength that is yet entirely unrefined, moving uncertainly with gigantic strides. Just consider their main creation myth. After defeating the Giant Ymir, a creature formed from “warm wind” and a mix of Frost and Fire, the gods decided to create a world from him. His blood became the sea; his flesh became land, and his bones turned into rocks; from his eyebrows, they built Asgard, their home for the gods; his skull became the great blue sky, and his brains turned into clouds. What a gigantic task! Untamed thought, colossal and giant-like; which, in time, will be refined into a form of greatness that’s not merely giant-like but godlike, surpassing even giants, as we see in the works of Shakespeare and Goethe! Spiritually and physically, these figures are our ancestors.
I like, too, that representation they have of the Tree Igdrasil. All Life is figured by them as a Tree. Igdrasil, the Ash-tree of Existence, has its roots deep-down in the kingdoms of Hela or Death; its trunk reaches up heaven-high, spreads its boughs over the whole Universe: it is the Tree of Existence. At the foot of it, in the Death-kingdom, sit three Nornas, Fates,—the Past, Present, Future; watering its roots from the Sacred Well. Its ‘boughs,’ with their buddings and disleafings,—events, things suffered, things done, catastrophes,—stretch through all lands and times. Is not every leaf of it a biography, every fibre there an act or word? Its boughs are Histories of Nations. The rustle of it is the noise of Human Existence, onwards from of old. It grows there, the breath of Human Passion rustling through it;—or stormtost, the stormwind howling through it like the voice of all the gods. It is Igdrasil, the Tree of Existence. It is the past, the present, and the future; what was done, what is doing, what will be done; ‘the infinite conjugation of the verb To do.’ Considering how human things circulate, each inextricably in communion 258with all,—how the word I speak to you to-day is borrowed, not from Ulfila the Mœsogoth only, but from all men since the first man began to speak,—I find no similitude so true as this of a Tree. Beautiful; altogether beautiful and great. The ‘Machine of the Universe,’—alas, do but think of that in contrast!
I also appreciate their representation of the Tree Igdrasil. They depict all life as a Tree. Igdrasil, the Ash-tree of Existence, has its roots deep in the realms of Hela or Death; its trunk reaches high into the heavens, spreading its branches over the entire Universe: it is the Tree of Existence. At its base, in the Death realm, sit three Nornas, or Fates—the Past, Present, and Future—watering its roots from the Sacred Well. Its 'branches,' with their budding and shedding—events, sufferings, achievements, disasters—extend through all lands and times. Isn’t every leaf a biography, and every fiber a deed or word? Its branches represent the Histories of Nations. The rustling of its leaves is the sound of Human Existence, stretching back to ancient times. It thrives, with the breath of Human Passion whispering through it; or, during storms, the wind howls through it like the voice of all the gods. It is Igdrasil, the Tree of Existence. It encompasses the past, the present, and the future; what has been done, what is being done, and what will be done; 'the infinite conjugation of the verb To do.’ Considering how human experiences intertwine, each connected with all—how the words I speak to you today are borrowed, not just from Ulfila the Mœsogoth, but from all people since the first human began to talk—I find no comparison as accurate as that of a Tree. Beautiful; altogether beautiful and grand. The ‘Machine of the Universe’—just think about that in contrast!
Well, it is strange enough this old Norse view of Nature; different enough from what we believe of Nature. Whence it specially came, one would not like to be compelled to say very minutely! One thing we may say: It came from the thoughts of Norse men;—from the thought, above all, of the first Norse man who had an original power of thinking. The First Norse ‘man of genius,’ as we should call him! Innumerable men had passed by, across this Universe, with a dumb vague wonder, such as the very animals may feel; or with a painful, fruitlessly inquiring wonder, such as men only feel;—till the great Thinker came, the original man, the Seer; whose shaped spoken Thought awakes the slumbering capability of all into Thought. It is ever the way with the Thinker, the spiritual Hero. What he says, all men were not far from saying, were longing to say. The Thoughts of all start up, as from painful enchanted sleep, round his Thought; answering to it, Yes, even so! Joyful to men as the dawning of day from night; is it not, indeed, the awakening for them from no-being into being, from death into life? We still honour such a man; call him Poet, Genius, and so forth: but to these wild men he was a very magician, a worker of miraculous unexpected blessing for them; a Prophet, a God!—Thought once awakened does not again slumber; unfolds itself into a System of Thought; grows, in man after man, generation after generation,—till its full stature is reached, and such System of Thought can grow no farther, but must give place to another.
Well, it’s pretty strange this old Norse view of Nature; it’s quite different from what we believe about Nature today. Where it specifically came from is hard to pin down! But one thing we can say: it originated from the thoughts of Norse people; particularly from the mind of the first Norse person who had the unique ability to think. The First Norse ‘genius,’ as we would call him! Countless people had passed through this Universe, filled with a vague, dumb wonder, similar to what animals might feel; or with a painful, fruitless curiosity, something only humans experience—until the great Thinker arrived, the original person, the Seer; whose shaped spoken Thought awakened the dormant potential for Thought in everyone. This is always how it is with the Thinker, the spiritual Hero. What he expresses, everyone else was almost saying, even longing to say. The Thoughts of all spring forth, as if from a painful enchanted sleep, in response to his Thought; affirming it, Yes, exactly! Joyful for people like the sunrise after night; is it not a kind of awakening for them from nothingness into existence, from death into life? We still honor such individuals; we call them Poet, Genius, and so on: but to these wild people he was like a magician, a bringer of miraculous, unexpected blessings; a Prophet, a God!—Thought once awakened doesn’t fall back to sleep; it expands into a System of Thought; it grows, from person to person, generation after generation—until it reaches its full potential, at which point that System of Thought can no longer grow, and must make way for another.
For the Norse people, the Man now named Odin, and Chief Norse God, we fancy, was such a man. A Teacher, and Captain of soul and of body; a Hero, of worth immeasurable; admiration for whom, transcending the known bounds, became adoration. Has he not the 259power of articulate Thinking; and many other powers, as yet miraculous? So, with boundless gratitude, would the rude Norse heart feel. Has he not solved for them the sphinx-enigma of this Universe; given assurance to them of their own destiny there? By him they know now what they have to do here, what to look for hereafter. Existence has become articulate, melodious by him; he first has made Life alive!—We may call this Odin, the origin of Norse Mythology: Odin, or whatever name the First Norse Thinker bore while he was a man among men. His view of the Universe once promulgated, a like view starts into being in all minds; grows, keeps ever growing, while it continues credible there. In all minds it lay written, but invisibly, as in sympathetic ink; at his word it starts into visibility in all. Nay, in every epoch of the world, the great event, parent of all others, is it not the arrival of a Thinker in the world!—
For the Norse people, the man we now call Odin, the Chief Norse God, was truly remarkable. He was a Teacher and a leader of both spirit and body; a Hero of immeasurable worth, whose admiration crossed into adoration. Does he not possess the power of articulate thought, along with many other seemingly miraculous abilities? The rugged Norse heart would feel endless gratitude for him. Has he not unraveled the mystery of this Universe for them and given them assurance of their destiny? Thanks to him, they now understand what they need to do here and what to expect in the future. Existence has become clear and harmonious through his influence; he was the first to make Life vibrant!—We can refer to this as Odin, the source of Norse Mythology: Odin, or whatever name the First Norse Thinker had while he was one of us. Once his perspective on the Universe was shared, a similar understanding began to emerge in everyone's minds; it grows and continues to grow as long as it remains credible. It was written in all minds, though invisibly like sympathetic ink; at his command, it becomes visible to all. Indeed, throughout history, the most significant event, the root of all others, is not the arrival of a Thinker in the world!—
One other thing we must not forget; it will explain, a little, the confusion of these Norse Eddas. They are not one coherent System of Thought; but properly the summation of several successive systems. All this of the old Norse Belief which is flung-out for us, in one level of distance in the Edda, like a picture painted on the same canvas, does not at all stand so in the reality. It stands rather at all manner of distances and depths, of successive generations since the Belief first began. All Scandinavian thinkers, since the first of them, contributed to the Scandinavian System of Thought; in ever-new elaboration and addition, it is the combined work of them all. What history it had, how it changed from shape to shape, by one thinker’s contribution after another, till it got to the full final shape we see it under in the Edda, no man will now ever know: its Councils of Trebisond, Councils of Trent, Athanasiuses, Dantes, Luthers, are sunk without echo in the dark night! Only that it had such a history we can all know. Wheresoever a thinker appeared, there in the thing he thought-of was a contribution, accession, a change or revolution made. Alas, the grandest ‘revolution’ of all, the one made by the man Odin himself, is not this too sunk for us like the rest! Of Odin what history? 260Strange rather to reflect that he had a history! That this Odin, in his wild Norse vesture, with his wild beard and eyes, his rude Norse speech and ways, was a man like us; with our sorrows, joys, with our limbs, features;—intrinsically all one as we: and did such a work! But the work, much of it, has perished; the worker, all to the name. “Wednesday,” men will say to-morrow; Odin’s day! Of Odin there exists no history; no document of it; no guess about it worth repeating.
One other thing we must not forget; it will explain, a little, the confusion of these Norse Eddas. They are not one coherent System of Thought; rather, they are the summation of several successive systems. All this old Norse Belief presented to us, at one level of distance in the Edda, like a picture painted on the same canvas, doesn't reflect reality at all. It actually exists at various distances and depths, representing the many generations since the Belief first emerged. All Scandinavian thinkers, from the very first, contributed to the Scandinavian System of Thought, continuously developing and adding to it; it is the combined effort of them all. What history it had, how it transformed from shape to shape, through one thinker’s contribution after another, until it reached the final form we see in the Edda, no one will ever fully understand: its Councils of Trebisond, Councils of Trent, Athanasiuses, Dantes, Luthers, are lost without a trace in the dark night! We can only know that it had such a history. Where a thinker appeared, there was a contribution, a change or revolution made. Sadly, the greatest ‘revolution’ of all, the one created by Odin himself, is also lost to us! What history is there of Odin? 260 It’s strange to think that he had a history! That this Odin, in his wild Norse attire, with his wild beard and eyes, his rough Norse speech and mannerisms, was a man like us; sharing our sorrows and joys, with our limbs and features;—intrinsically just like us: and he accomplished such a work! But much of that work has been lost; only the name of the worker remains. “Wednesday,” people will say tomorrow; Odin’s day! There is no history of Odin; no document exists; no guess about it worth repeating.
Snorro indeed, in the quietest manner, almost in a brief business style, writes down, in his Heimskringla, how Odin was a heroic Prince, in the Black-Sea region, with Twelve Peers, and a great people straitened for room. How he led these Asen (Asiatics) of his out of Asia; settled them in the North parts of Europe, by warlike conquest; invented Letters, Poetry and so forth,—and came by and by to be worshipped as Chief God by these Scandinavians, his Twelve Peers made into Twelve Sons of his own, Gods like himself: Snorro has no doubt of this. Saxo Grammaticus, a very curious Northman of that same century, is still more unhesitating; scruples not to find out a historical fact in every individual mythus, and writes it down as a terrestrial event in Denmark or elsewhere. Torfæus, learned and cautious, some centuries later, assigns by calculation a date for it: Odin, he says, came into Europe about the Year 70 before Christ. Of all which, as grounded on mere uncertainties, found to be untenable now, I need say nothing. Far, very far beyond the Year 70! Odin’s date, adventures, whole terrestrial history, figure and environment are sunk from us forever into unknown thousands of years.
Snorro, in a very understated way, almost in a straightforward business style, records in his Heimskringla that Odin was a heroic prince from the Black Sea region, along with Twelve Peers, leading a large population that was short on space. He brought these Asen (Asiatics) out of Asia and settled them in northern Europe through military conquest; he invented letters, poetry, and so on, and eventually became worshipped as the chief god by these Scandinavians, with his Twelve Peers transformed into Twelve Sons, gods like him. Snorro believes this without question. Saxo Grammaticus, a very interesting Northman from the same century, is even more confident; he doesn't hesitate to find a historical fact in every individual myth and documents it as an event that occurred in Denmark or elsewhere. Torfæus, learned and careful, several centuries later, calculates a date for it: he claims Odin came to Europe around 70 B.C. Of all this, based on mere uncertainties that have now been shown to be untenable, I need to say nothing. Far, far beyond the year 70! Odin’s timeline, adventures, entire earthly history, figure, and context are lost to us forever in the depths of unknown thousands of years.
Nay Grimm, the German Antiquary, goes so far as to deny that any man Odin ever existed. He proves it by etymology. The word Wuotan, which is the original form of Odin, a word spread, as name of their chief Divinity, over all the Teutonic Nations everywhere; this word, which connects itself, according to Grimm, with the Latin vadere, with the English wade and suchlike,—means primarily Movement, Source of Movement, Power; and is the fit name of the highest god, not of 261any man. The word signifies Divinity, he says, among the old Saxon, German and all Teutonic Nations; the adjectives formed from it all signify divine, supreme, or something pertaining to the chief god. Like enough! We must bow to Grimm in matters etymological. Let us consider it fixed that Wuotan means Wading, force of Movement. And now still, what hinders it from being the name of a Heroic Man and Mover, as well as of a god? As for the adjectives, and words formed from it,—did not the Spaniards in their universal admiration for Lope, get into the habit of saying ‘a Lope flower,’ a ‘Lope dama,’ if the flower or woman were of surpassing beauty? Had this lasted, Lope would have grown, in Spain, to be an adjective signifying godlike also. Indeed, Adam Smith, in his Essay on Language, surmises that all adjectives whatsoever were formed precisely in that way: some very green thing chiefly notable for its greenness, got the appellative name Green, and then the next thing remarkable for that quality, a tree for instance, was named the green tree,—as we still say ‘the steam coach,’ ‘four-horse coach,’ or the like. All primary adjectives, according to Smith, were formed in this way; were at first substantives and things. We cannot annihilate a man for etymologies like that! Surely there was a First Teacher and Captain; surely there must have been an Odin, palpable to the sense at one time; no adjective, but a real Hero of flesh and blood! The voice of all tradition, history or echo of history, agrees with all that thought will teach one about it, to assure us of this.
No, Grimm, the German scholar, goes as far as to deny that any man named Odin ever existed. He supports this by looking at the origins of words. The term Wuotan, which is the original version of Odin and was used as the name of the chief deity among all the Germanic tribes, is linked, according to Grimm, to the Latin vadere and the English wade. He argues that it primarily means Movement, Source of Movement, or Power; and that it is a more fitting name for the highest god rather than for any human being. He claims that the term signifies divinity among the old Saxons, Germans, and all Germanic nations; and that the adjectives derived from it all mean divine, supreme, or something related to the chief god. That seems plausible! We have to respect Grimm's views on word origins. Let’s agree that Wuotan means Wading or the force of Movement. Yet, what stops it from being the name of a heroic man and Mover, as well as a god? Regarding the adjectives and words derived from it—didn’t the Spaniards, in their admiration for Lope, start saying ‘a Lope flower’ or a ‘Lope dama’ to describe a flower or woman of exceptional beauty? If this had continued, Lope would have become an adjective meaning godlike in Spain. In fact, Adam Smith, in his Essay on Language, speculates that all adjectives were formed in that way: something notably green got called Green, and then the next thing notable for that quality, like a tree, became the green tree—as we still say ‘the steam coach’ or ‘four-horse coach.’ Smith argues that all primary adjectives originally came from nouns. We can’t disregard a man based solely on etymologies like that! Surely, there was a First Teacher and Leader; there must have been an Odin, someone tangible at one point; not just an adjective, but a real hero of flesh and blood! The voice of all tradition, history, or the echoes of history support this view and confirm what thought can teach us about it.
How the man Odin came to be considered a god, the chief god?—that surely is a question which nobody would wish to dogmatise upon. I have said, his people knew no limits to their admiration of him; they had as yet no scale to measure admiration by. Fancy your own generous heart’s-love of some greatest man expanding till it transcended all bounds, till it filled and overflowed the whole field of your thought! Or what if this man Odin,—since a great deep soul, with the afflatus and mysterious tide of vision and impulse rushing on him he knows not whence, is ever an enigma, 262a kind of terror and wonder to himself,—should have felt that perhaps he was divine; that he was some effluence of the ‘Wuotan,’ ‘Movement,’ Supreme Power and Divinity, of whom to his rapt vision all Nature was the awful Flame-image; that some effluence of Wuotan dwelt here in him! He was not necessarily false; he was but mistaken, speaking the truest he knew. A great soul, any sincere soul, knows not what he is,—alternates between the highest height and the lowest depth; can, of all things, the least measure—Himself! What others take him for, and what he guesses that he may be; these two items strangely act on one another, help to determine one another. With all men reverently admiring him; with his own wild soul full of noble ardours and affections, of whirlwind chaotic darkness and glorious new light; a divine Universe bursting all into godlike beauty round him, and no man to whom the like ever had befallen, what could he think himself to be? “Wuotan?” All men answered, “Wuotan!”—
How the man Odin came to be seen as a god, the chief god?—that’s definitely a question that no one would want to be dogmatic about. I’ve said his people had no limits to their admiration for him; they didn’t have any way to measure it. Imagine your own generous love for the greatest person you know growing until it transcended all boundaries, filling and overflowing your entire mind! Or what if this man Odin—since a deeply soulful person, filled with a rush of vision and impulse that he doesn’t understand, always remains a mystery, a source of both fear and awe to himself—felt that maybe he was divine; that he was some manifestation of ‘Wuotan,’ ‘Movement,’ Supreme Power and Divinity, to whom all of Nature appeared as a terrifying Flame-image; that somehow some essence of Wuotan resided within him? He wasn’t necessarily deceitful; he was just mistaken, expressing the truest beliefs he had. A great soul, any sincere soul, doesn’t really know who they are—they fluctuate between the highest peaks and the lowest valleys; they are the least able to measure—Themselves! How others perceive him, and what he suspects he might be, these two aspects deeply influence one another. With everyone admiring him reverently; with his own wild spirit filled with noble passions and affections, swirling chaotic darkness and brilliant new light; a divine Universe surrounding him bursting into godlike beauty, and no one else having experienced such a thing, what could he think he was? “Wuotan?” Everyone responded, “Wuotan!”—
And then consider what mere Time will do in such cases; how if a man was great while living, he becomes tenfold greater when dead. What an enormous camera-obscura magnifier is Tradition! How a thing grows in the human Memory, in the human Imagination, when love, worship and all that lies in the human Heart, is there to encourage it. And in the darkness, in the entire ignorance; without date or document, no book, no Arundel-marble; only here and there some dumb monumental cairn. Why, in thirty or forty years, were there no books, any great man would grow mythic, the contemporaries who had once seen him, being all dead. And in three-hundred years, and three-thousand years—!—To attempt theorising on such matters would profit little: they are matters which refuse to be theoremed and diagramed; which Logic ought to know that she cannot speak of. Enough for us to discern, far in the uttermost distance, some gleam as of a small real light shining in the centre of that enormous camera-obscura image; to discern that the centre of it all was not a madness and nothing, but a sanity and something.
And then think about what mere time does in these situations; how if someone was significant while alive, they become even greater after death. Tradition is like a huge camera obscura magnifier! Something expands in human memory and imagination when love, worship, and everything in the human heart boosts it. And in the shadows, in total ignorance—without dates or documents, no books, no Arundel marble; just a few mute monumental cairns here and there. In thirty or forty years, if there were no books, any great person would become mythical, with all their contemporaries gone. And in three hundred years, or three thousand years—! Trying to theorize about such things wouldn’t help much: these are subjects that resist being theorized and diagrammed; Logic should recognize that it can't define them. It's enough for us to glimpse, far in the distant background, a flicker of genuine light shining in the center of that vast camera obscura image; to realize that the core of it all wasn’t madness or nothingness, but sanity and something real.
This light, kindled in the great dark vortex of the 263Norse mind, dark but living, waiting only for light; this is to me the centre of the whole. How such light will then shine out, and with wondrous thousandfold expansion spread itself, in forms and colours, depends not on it, so much as on the National Mind recipient of it. The colours and forms of your light will be those of the cut-glass it has to shine through.—Curious to think how, for every man, any the truest fact is modelled by the nature of the man! I said, The earnest man, speaking to his brother men, must always have stated what seemed to him a fact, a real Appearance of Nature. But the way in which such Appearance or fact shaped itself,—what sort of fact it became for him,—was and is modified by his own laws of thinking; deep, subtle, but universal, ever-operating laws. The world of Nature, for every man, is the Phantasy of Himself; this world is the multiplex ‘Image of his own Dream.’ Who knows to what unnameable subtleties of spiritual law all these Pagan Fables owe their shape! The number Twelve, divisiblest of all, which could be halved, quartered, parted into three, into six, the most remarkable number,—this was enough to determine the Signs of the Zodiac, the number of Odin’s Sons, and innumerable other Twelves. Any vague rumour of number had a tendency to settle itself into Twelve. So with regard to every other matter. And quite unconsciously too,—with no notion of building-up ‘Allegories’! But the fresh clear glance of those First Ages would be prompt in discerning the secret relations of things, and wholly open to obey these. Schiller finds in the Cestus of Venus an everlasting æsthetic truth as to the nature of all Beauty; curious:—but he is careful not to insinuate that the old Greek Mythists had any notion of lecturing about the ‘Philosophy of Criticism’!——On the whole we must leave those boundless regions. Cannot we conceive that Odin was a reality? Error indeed, error enough: but sheer falsehood, idle fables, allegory aforethought,—we will not believe that our Fathers believed in these.
This light, ignited in the vast dark void of the Norse mind—dark yet alive, just waiting for light—this, to me, is the center of everything. How this light shines out and expands in amazing, varied forms and colors depends not so much on the light itself but on the National Mind that receives it. The colors and forms of your light will reflect the cut glass it has to shine through. It’s interesting to consider how every person shapes even the truest fact according to their own nature! I said that an earnest person, speaking to their fellow humans, must always communicate what seems like a fact, a real Appearance of Nature. However, the way this Appearance or fact takes shape—the kind of fact it becomes for them—is influenced by their own ways of thinking; deep, subtle, but universal, ever-operating laws. For every person, the world of Nature is a reflection of themselves; this world is the complex ‘Image of their own Dream.’ Who knows what indescribable subtleties of spiritual law give shape to all these Pagan Fables! The number Twelve, the most divisible of all, which can be halved, quartered, split into three, or six, is such a remarkable number—this was enough to define the Signs of the Zodiac, the number of Odin’s Sons, and countless other Twelves. Any vague suggestion of a number had a tendency to settle into Twelve. The same goes for everything else. And they did so quite unconsciously—without any intention of creating ‘Allegories’! But the fresh, clear perspective of those Early Ages would quickly recognize the secret connections of things and would be fully open to follow them. Schiller finds in the Cestus of Venus an eternal aesthetic truth about the nature of all Beauty; interesting, but he’s careful not to imply that the old Greek Myth-makers had any idea of lecturing on the ‘Philosophy of Criticism’! In any case, we must leave those limitless worlds. Can’t we imagine that Odin was real? There may be errors aplenty, but we refuse to believe that our ancestors thought of these as mere falsehoods, idle tales, or premeditated allegories.
Odin’s Runes are a significant feature of him. Runes, and the miracles of ‘magic’ he worked by them, make 264a great feature in tradition. Runes are the Scandinavian Alphabet; suppose Odin to have been the inventor of Letters, as well as ‘magic,’ among that people! It is the greatest invention man has ever made, this of marking down the unseen thought that is in him by written characters. It is a kind of second speech, almost as miraculous as the first. You remember the astonishment and incredulity of Atahualpa the Peruvian King; how he made the Spanish Soldier who was guarding him scratch Dios on his thumb-nail, that he might try the next soldier with it, to ascertain whether such a miracle was possible. If Odin brought Letters among his people, he might work magic enough!
Odin’s Runes are a major aspect of his identity. Runes, along with the ‘magic’ he performed with them, play a significant role in tradition. Runes are the Scandinavian alphabet; imagine Odin as the inventor of letters and ‘magic’ among his people! It's the greatest invention humanity has ever created—the ability to capture invisible thoughts through written characters. It’s like a second language, nearly as miraculous as the first. You remember the shock and disbelief of Atahualpa, the Peruvian king; how he had the Spanish soldier guarding him scratch Dios on his thumbnail, so he could test the next soldier with it to see if such a miracle was possible. If Odin introduced letters to his people, he could work all sorts of magic!
Writing by Runes has some air of being original among the Norsemen: not a Phœnician Alphabet, but a native Scandinavian one. Snorro tells us farther that Odin invented Poetry; the music of human speech, as well as that miraculous runic marking of it. Transport yourselves into the early childhood of nations; the first beautiful morning-light of our Europe, when all yet lay in fresh young radiance as of a great sunrise, and our Europe was first beginning to think, to be! Wonder, hope; infinite radiance of hope and wonder, as of a young child’s thoughts, in the hearts of these strong men! Strong sons of Nature; and here was not only a wild Captain and Fighter; discerning with his wild flashing eyes what to do, with his wild lion-heart daring and doing it; but a Poet too, all that we mean by a Poet, Prophet, great devout Thinker and Inventor,—as the truly Great Man ever is. A Hero is a Hero at all points; in the soul and thought of him first of all. This Odin, in his rude semi-articulate way, had a word to speak. A great heart laid open to take in this great Universe, and man’s Life here, and utter a great word about it. A Hero, as I say, in his own rude manner; a wise, gifted, noble-hearted man. And now, if we still admire such a man beyond all others, what must these wild Norse souls, first awakened into thinking, have made of him! To them, as yet without names for it, he was noble and noblest; Hero, Prophet, God; Wuotan, the greatest of all. Thought is Thought, however it speak or spell itself. Intrinsically, I conjecture, 265this Odin must have been of the same sort of stuff as the greatest kind of men. A great thought in the wild deep heart of him! The rough words he articulated, are they not the rudimental roots of those English words we still use? He worked so, in that obscure element. But he was as a light kindled in it; a light of Intellect, rude Nobleness of heart, the only kind of lights we have yet; a Hero, as I say: and he had to shine there, and make his obscure element a little lighter,—as is still the task of us all.
Writing in Runes has a sense of originality among the Norsemen: not a Phoenician Alphabet, but a native Scandinavian one. Snorro further tells us that Odin invented Poetry; the rhythm of human speech, as well as that magical runic marking of it. Imagine the early childhood of nations; the first beautiful morning light of Europe, when everything was still fresh and radiant like a great sunrise, and Europe was just starting to think, to be! Wonder, hope; infinite radiance of hope and wonder, like the thoughts of a young child, filled the hearts of these strong men! Strong sons of Nature; and here was not just a wild Captain and Fighter, perceiving with his fierce flashing eyes what to do, driven by a wild lion-heart in daring and doing it; but also a Poet, embodying all that we mean by a Poet, Prophet, great devout Thinker and Inventor,—as is true of any Great Man. A Hero is a Hero in every way; first in spirit and thought. This Odin, in his rough semi-articulate way, had something to say. A big heart open to embrace this vast Universe, and man’s life here, and express a great thought about it. A Hero, as I said, in his own crude way; a wise, talented, noble-hearted man. And now, if we still admire such a person above all others, what must those wild Norse souls, just awakening to thought, have perceived in him! To them, still without words for it, he was noble and noblest; Hero, Prophet, God; Wuotan, the greatest of all. Thought is Thought, no matter how it speaks or spells itself. I guess, intrinsically, 265 this Odin must have been made of the same sort of essence as the greatest kind of men. A great thought lived in the wild deep heart of him! The rough words he spoke are they not the fundamental roots of those English words we still use? He operated like that, in that obscure realm. But he was like a light ignited within it; a light of Intellect, rugged Nobleness of heart, the only kind of lights we have so far; a Hero, as I say: and he had to shine there, and make his obscure realm a little brighter,—as is still the task of all of us.
We will fancy him to be the Type Norseman; the finest Teuton whom that race had yet produced. The rude Norse heart burst-up into boundless admiration round him; into adoration. He is as a root of so many great things; the fruit of him is found growing, from deep thousands of years, over the whole field of Teutonic Life. Our own Wednesday, as I said, is it not still Odin’s Day? Wednesbury, Wansborough, Wanstead, Wandsworth: Odin grew into England too, these are still leaves from that root! He was the Chief God to all the Teutonic Peoples; their Pattern Norseman;—in such way did they admire their Pattern Norseman; that was the fortune he had in the world.
We imagine him to be the ideal Norseman, the finest Germanic figure that race has ever produced. The rugged Norse spirit overflowed with admiration and worship for him. He is the source of so many amazing things; his influence has been growing for thousands of years throughout the entire landscape of Germanic culture. Our own Wednesday, as I mentioned, is it not still Odin's Day? Wednesbury, Wansborough, Wanstead, Wandsworth: Odin's presence spread to England as well; these are still remnants from that source! He was the chief god to all the Germanic peoples; their model Norseman—such was the esteem that they held for their model Norseman; that was the legacy he left in the world.
Thus if the man Odin himself have vanished utterly, there is this huge Shadow of him which still projects itself over the whole History of his People. For this Odin once admitted to be God, we can understand well that the whole Scandinavian Scheme of Nature, or dim No-scheme, whatever it might before have been, would now begin to develop itself altogether differently, and grow thenceforth in a new manner. What this Odin saw into, and taught with his runes and his rhymes, the whole Teutonic People laid to heart and carried forward. His way of thought became their way of thought:—such, under new conditions, is the history of every great thinker still. In gigantic confused lineaments, like some enormous camera-obscura shadow thrown upwards from the dead deeps of the Past, and covering the whole Northern Heaven, is not that Scandinavian Mythology in some sort the Portraiture of this man Odin? The gigantic image of his natural face, legible or not legible there, expanded and confused 266in that manner! Ah, Thought, I say, is always Thought. No great man lives in vain. The History of the world is but the Biography of great men.
So, if Odin himself has completely disappeared, there’s still this massive Shadow of him that looms over the entire History of his People. Odin once acknowledged himself as a God, and we can easily see that the entire Scandinavian view of Nature, or whatever it once was, would now start to develop in a completely different way and grow from then on in a new direction. What Odin understood and taught through his runes and rhymes, the whole Teutonic People embraced and carried forward. His way of thinking became their way of thinking: that’s how the story of every great thinker unfolds under new circumstances. In vast, confusing outlines, like a huge shadow projected from the depths of the Past, covering the entire Northern Sky, isn’t Scandinavian Mythology in some way a depiction of this man Odin? The massive image of his natural face, whether clear or unclear, expanded and twisted like that! Ah, Thought, I say, is always Thought. No great man lives in vain. The History of the world is really just the Biography of great men.
To me there is something very touching in this primeval figure of Heroism; in such artless, helpless, but hearty entire reception of a Hero by his fellow-men. Never so helpless in shape, it is the noblest of feelings, and a feeling in some shape or other perennial as man himself. If I could show in any measure, what I feel deeply for a long time now, That it is the vital element of manhood, the soul of man’s history here in our world,—it would be the chief use of this discoursing at present. We do not now call our great men Gods, nor admire without limit; ah, no, with limit enough! But if we have no great men, or do not admire at all,—that were a still worse case.
To me, there’s something really moving about this ancient idea of Heroism; in such a simple, vulnerable, but heartfelt reception of a Hero by his fellow humans. Even though it appears so helpless, it represents the noblest of feelings, a feeling that is somehow as enduring as humanity itself. If I could express even a bit of what I’ve felt deeply for a long time now, that it is the essential element of manhood, the essence of man’s history here in our world—this would be the main purpose of this discussion right now. We don’t call our great men Gods anymore, nor do we admire them without limits; oh no, with enough limits! But if we have no great men at all, or if we don’t admire them at all—that would be an even worse situation.
This poor Scandinavian Hero-worship, that whole Norse way of looking at the Universe, and adjusting oneself there, has an indestructible merit for us. A rude childlike way of recognising the divineness of Nature, the divineness of Man; most rude, yet heartfelt, robust, giantlike; betokening what a giant of a man this child would grow to!—It was a truth, and is none. Is it not as the half-dumb stifled voice of the long-buried generations of our own Fathers, calling out of the depths of ages to us, in whose veins their blood still runs: “This then, this is what we made of the world: this is all the image and notion we could form to ourselves of this great mystery of a Life and Universe. Despise it not. You are raised high above it, to large free scope of vision; but you too are not yet at the top. No, your notion too, so much enlarged, is but a partial, imperfect one: that matter is a thing no man will ever, in time or out of time, comprehend; after thousands of years of ever-new expansion, man will find himself but struggling to comprehend again a part of it: the thing is larger than man, not to be comprehended by him; an Infinite thing!”
This misguided Scandinavian hero-worship, that entire Norse perspective on the Universe and how to find one’s place in it, has an undeniable value for us. It's a primitive, childlike way of recognizing the divinity in Nature and in Humanity; so basic, yet sincere, strong, and powerful; suggesting what a remarkable person this child could become!—It was a truth, and it isn’t anymore. Isn't it like the muffled, stifled echo of the long-buried generations of our Ancestors, calling out from the depths of time to us, in whose veins their blood still flows: “This, then, is what we made of the world: this is the only image and idea we could create of this great mystery of Life and the Universe. Don’t look down on it. You stand far above it, with a broad, free perspective; but you are still not at the top. No, your understanding, though much broader, is still just a partial, flawed one: that matter is something no one will ever fully grasp, in this life or beyond; after thousands of years of continual expansion, humanity will find itself still struggling to understand just a fragment of it: the thing is larger than man, beyond his full comprehension; it is an Infinite thing!”
The essence of the Scandinavian, as indeed of all Pagan Mythologies, we found to be recognition of the divineness of Nature; sincere communion of man with 267the mysterious invisible Powers visibly seen at work in the world round him. This, I should say, is more sincerely done in the Scandinavian than in any Mythology I know. Sincerity is the great characteristic of it. Superior sincerity (far superior) consoles us for the total want of old Grecian grace. Sincerity, I think, is better than grace. I feel that these old Northmen were looking into Nature with open eye and soul: most earnest, honest; childlike, and yet manlike; with a great-hearted simplicity and depth and freshness, in a true, loving, admiring, unfearing way. A right valiant, true old race of men. Such recognition of Nature one finds to be the chief element of Paganism: recognition of Man, and his Moral Duty, though this too is not wanting, comes to be the chief element only in purer forms of religion. Here, indeed, is a great distinction and epoch in Human Beliefs; a great landmark in the religious development of Mankind. Man first puts himself in relation with Nature and her Powers, wonders and worships over those; not till a later epoch does he discern that all Power is Moral, that the grand point is the distinction for him of Good and Evil, of Thou shalt and Thou shalt not.
The core of Scandinavian, like all Pagan mythologies, revolves around recognizing the divinity of Nature; a genuine connection between humans and the mysterious, invisible forces that are visibly at work in the world around us. I would say that this is expressed more authentically in Scandinavian myths than in any others I know. Authenticity is its defining trait. This deep sincerity compensates for the complete absence of the old Greek elegance. I believe sincerity is more important than grace. I feel that these ancient Northmen gazed upon Nature with open eyes and hearts: earnest, honest; childlike yet mature; with a heartfelt simplicity, depth, and freshness, in a true, loving, admiring, and fearless way. They were a truly brave and genuine old race. This acknowledgment of Nature is the central aspect of Paganism: recognizing humanity and its moral obligations, although this too becomes more significant in purer forms of religion. Here lies a significant distinction and turning point in human beliefs; a major milestone in the religious evolution of humanity. Initially, humans establish a connection with Nature and its forces, marveling and worshiping them; it isn't until later that they realize that all power is moral, that the key focus is the distinction between Good and Evil, between You shall and You shall not.
With regard to all these fabulous delineations in the Edda, I will remark, moreover, as indeed was already hinted, that most probably they must have been of much newer date; most probably, even from the first, were comparatively idle for the old Norsemen, and as it were a kind of Poetic sport. Allegory and Poetic Delineation, as I said above, cannot be religious Faith; the Faith itself must first be there, then Allegory enough will gather round it, as the fit body round its soul. The Norse Faith, I can well suppose, like other Faiths, was most active while it lay mainly in the silent state, and had not yet much to say about itself, still less to sing.
Regarding all these amazing descriptions in the Edda, I will also point out, as was already suggested, that they were likely created much later; they were probably, from the start, somewhat trivial for the old Norsemen, a sort of poetic pastime. Allegory and poetic representation, as I mentioned earlier, cannot replace true religious faith; the faith itself must be present first, and then allegory will naturally accumulate around it, like a fitting body surrounding its soul. I can imagine that the Norse faith, like other faiths, was most vibrant when it was mostly unspoken and hadn’t yet formulated much to say about itself, let alone to sing about.
Among those shadowy Edda matters, amid all that fantastic congeries of assertions, and traditions, in their musical Mythologies, the main practical belief a man could have was probably not much more than this: of the Valkyrs and the Hall of Odin; of an inflexible Destiny; and that the one thing needful for a man 268was to be brave. The Valkyrs are Choosers of the Slain: a Destiny inexorable, which it is useless trying to bend or soften, has appointed who is to be slain; this was a fundamental point for the Norse believer;—as indeed it is for all earnest men everywhere, for a Mahomet, a Luther, for a Napoleon too. It lies at the basis this for every such man; it is the woof out of which his whole system of thought is woven. The Valkyrs; and then that these Choosers lead the brave to a heavenly Hall of Odin; only the base and slavish being thrust elsewhither, into the realms of Hela the Death-goddess: I take this to have been the soul of the whole Norse Belief. They understood in their heart that it was indispensable to be brave; that Odin would have no favour for them, but despise and thrust them out, if they were not brave. Consider too whether there is not something in this! It is an everlasting duty, valid in our day as in that, the duty of being brave. Valour is still value. The first duty of a man is still that of subduing Fear. We must get rid of Fear; we cannot act at all till then. A man’s acts are slavish, not true but specious: his very thoughts are false, he thinks too as a slave and coward, till he have got Fear under his feet. Odin’s creed, if we disentangle the real kernel of it, is true to this hour. A man shall and must be valiant; he must march forward, and quit himself like a man—trusting imperturbably in the appointment and choice of the upper Powers; and, on the whole, not fear at all. Now and always, the completeness of his victory over Fear will determine how much of a man he is.
Among those mysterious Edda matters, amidst all that amazing jumble of claims and traditions in their rhythmic Mythologies, the main practical belief a person could hold was probably something like this: about the Valkyrs and the Hall of Odin; about an unchangeable Destiny; and that the one essential thing for a person was to be brave. The Valkyrs are the Choosers of the Slain: an unavoidable Destiny, which it is pointless to try to alter or soften, has decided who will be slain; this was a foundational belief for the Norse follower;—as indeed it is for all sincere individuals everywhere, for a Muhammad, a Luther, and even a Napoleon. It underpins every such individual; it is the very fabric from which their entire system of thought is created. The Valkyrs; and then that these Choosers guide the brave to a heavenly Hall of Odin; only the cowardly and submissive are sent elsewhere, to the realms of Hela the Death-goddess: I believe this encapsulated the essence of the whole Norse Belief. They understood deep down that it was essential to be brave; that Odin would show them no favor, but would scorn and cast them out if they lacked bravery. Consider too whether there isn't something profound in this! It is an eternal duty, relevant in our time as in theirs, the duty of being brave. Valour is still valuable. The foremost duty of a person remains that of overcoming Fear. We must conquer Fear; we cannot act at all until then. A person's actions become servile, not genuine but deceptive: even their thoughts are flawed; they think like a slave and coward until they have trampled Fear underfoot. Odin’s belief, if we can extract the real essence of it, holds true to this day. A person shall and must be courageous; they must move forward and conduct themselves like a person—trusting unwaveringly in the decisions and choices of the higher Powers; and, overall, not fear at all. Now and always, the extent of their victory over Fear will define how much of a person they truly are.
It is doubtless very savage that kind of valour of the old Northmen. Snorro tells us they thought it a shame and misery not to die in battle; and if natural death seemed to be coming on, they would cut wounds in their flesh, that Odin might receive them as warriors slain. Old kings, about to die, had their body laid into a ship; the ship sent forth, with sails set and slow fire burning it; that, once out at sea, it might blaze-up in flame, and in such manner bury worthily the old hero, at once in the sky and in the ocean! Wild bloody valour; yet valour of its kind; better, I say, than none. In the old Sea-kings too, what an indomitable rugged 269energy! Silent, with closed lips, as I fancy them, unconscious that they were specially brave; defying the wild ocean with its monsters, and all men and things;—progenitors of our own Blakes and Nelsons! No Homer sang these Norse Sea-kings; but Agamemnon’s was a small audacity, and of small fruit in the world, to some of them;—to Hrolf’s of Normandy, for instance! Hrolf, or Rollo Duke of Normandy, the wild Sea-king, has a share in governing England at this hour.
It’s certainly brutal, that kind of bravery from the old Northmen. Snorro tells us they saw it as a shame and a misery not to die in battle; and if natural death seemed imminent, they would inflict wounds on themselves so Odin could welcome them as slain warriors. Dying kings would have their bodies placed in a ship; the ship was sent off, with its sails up and a slow fire burning it, so that once at sea, it could blaze in flames, thus burying the old hero in a worthy manner, both in the sky and in the ocean! Such wild, bloody valor; yet valor in its own way; better, I say, than none at all. In the old Sea-kings too, what an unyielding, rugged 269energy! Silent, with closed lips, as I picture them, unaware of their special bravery; defying the wild ocean with its monsters, and all men and things;—ancestors of our own Blakes and Nelsons! No Homer sang about these Norse Sea-kings; but Agamemnon's was a small audacity, and of minor impact in the world, compared to some of them;—like Hrolf's of Normandy, for example! Hrolf, or Rollo, Duke of Normandy, the wild Sea-king, still has a part in governing England today.
Nor was it altogether nothing, even that wild sea-roving and battling, through so many generations. It needed to be ascertained which was the strongest kind of men; who were to be ruler over whom. Among the Northland Sovereigns, too, I find some who got the title Wood-cutter; Forest-felling Kings. Much lies in that. I suppose at bottom many of them were forest-fellers as well as fighters, though the Skalds talk mainly of the latter,—misleading certain critics not a little; for no nation of men could ever live by fighting alone; there could not produce enough come out of that! I suppose the right good fighter was oftenest also the right good forest-feller,—the right good improver, discerner, doer and worker in every kind; for true valour, different enough from ferocity, is the basis of all. A more legitimate kind of valour that; showing itself against the untamed Forests and dark brute Powers of Nature, to conquer Nature for us. In the same direction have not we their descendants since carried it far? May such valour last forever with us!
It wasn’t entirely insignificant, even that wild life of sailing and fighting over so many generations. It was important to determine who was the strongest type of man; who would lead whom. Among the Northern Kings, I also see some who earned the title Wood-cutter; Forest-felling Kings. There's a lot to that. I think many of them were both forest workers and warriors, even though the poets mostly focus on the latter—misleading some critics quite a bit; because no nation could survive solely by fighting; there just wouldn’t be enough to sustain them! I believe that a truly good fighter was often also a skilled forest worker—a true innovator, perceiver, doer, and contributor in every aspect; because true courage, which is quite different from savagery, is the foundation of everything. That's a more genuine kind of bravery; it demonstrates itself against the wild Forests and fierce forces of Nature, aiming to conquer Nature for our benefit. Haven’t we, their descendants, continued down this path? May such courage last forever with us!
That the man Odin, speaking with a Hero’s voice and heart, as with an impressiveness out of Heaven, told his People the infinite importance of Valour, how man thereby became a god; and that his People, feeling a response to it in their own hearts, believed this message of his, and thought it a message out of Heaven, and him a Divinity for telling it them: this seems to me the primary seed-grain of the Norse Religion, from which all manner of mythologies, symbolic practices, speculations, allegories, songs and sagas would naturally grow. Grow,—how strangely! I called it a small light shining and shaping in the huge vortex of Norse 270darkness. Yet the darkness itself was alive; consider that. It was the eager inarticulate uninstructed Mind of the whole Norse People, longing only to become articulate, to go on articulating ever farther! The living doctrine grows, grows;—like a Banyan-tree; the first seed is the essential thing: any branch strikes itself down into the earth, becomes a new root; and so, in endless complexity, we have a whole wood, a whole jungle, one seed the parent of it all. Was not the whole Norse Religion, accordingly, in some sense, what we called ‘the enormous shadow of this man’s likeness’? Critics trace some affinity in some Norse mythuses, of the Creation and suchlike, with those of the Hindoos. The Cow Adumbla, ‘licking the rime from the rocks,’ has a kind of Hindoo look. A Hindoo Cow, transported into frosty countries. Probably enough; indeed we may say undoubtedly, these things will have a kindred with the remotest lands, with the earliest times. Thought does not die, but only is changed. The first man that began to think in this Planet of ours, he was the beginner of all. And then the second man, and the third man:—nay, every true Thinker to this hour is a kind of Odin, teaches men his way of thought, spreads a shadow of his own likeness over sections of the History of the World.
That the man Odin, speaking with a Hero's voice and heart, as if with a message from Heaven, told his People the immense importance of Valor, how a man could become a god through it; and that his People, resonating with this message in their own hearts, believed him and viewed his words as divine revelation: this seems to me the fundamental seed of the Norse Religion, from which all sorts of mythologies, symbolic practices, theories, allegories, songs, and sagas would naturally emerge. Emerge—how strangely! I called it a small light shining and shaping in the vast darkness of Norse 270darkness. Yet the darkness itself was alive; think about that. It was the eager inarticulate and uninformed Mind of the entire Norse People, yearning to express itself, to keep articulating further! The living doctrine grows, grows;—like a Banyan tree; the first seed is the key thing: any branch that reaches down into the ground becomes a new root; and so, in endless complexity, we end up with a whole forest, a whole jungle, one seed being the parent of it all. Wasn't the whole Norse Religion, in some sense, what we call 'the enormous shadow of this man's likeness'? Critics find some connections between certain Norse myths, like Creation, and those of the Hindus. The Cow Adumbla, ‘licking the frost from the rocks,’ has a bit of a Hindu feel. A Hindu Cow, transported to icy lands. Quite possible; in fact, we can say undoubtedly that these ideas connect with distant places and ancient times. Thought doesn’t die but only transforms. The first man to start thinking on this Planet of ours was the beginning of it all. And then the second man, and the third man:—indeed, every true Thinker to this day is a kind of Odin, teaching people his way of thinking, casting a shadow of his own likeness over parts of World History.
Of the distinctive poetic character or merit of this Norse Mythology I have not room to speak; nor does it concern us much. Some wild Prophecies we have, as the Völuspa in the Elder Edda; of a rapt, earnest, sibylline sort. But they were comparatively an idle adjunct of the matter, men who as it were but toyed with the matter, these later Skalds; and it is their songs chiefly that survive. In later centuries, I suppose, they would go on singing, poetically symbolising, as our modern Painters paint, when it was no longer from the innermost heart, or not from the heart at all. This is everywhere to be well kept in mind.
Of the unique poetic qualities or value of this Norse Mythology, I don’t have space to discuss; it’s not very relevant to us. We have some wild prophecies, like the Völuspa in the Elder Edda, which are intense and mysterious. However, they were largely a trivial addition to the main content, as those later Skalds seemed to just play around with it; it’s mainly their songs that have lasted. In later centuries, I imagine they would continue singing, artistically representing it, much like our modern painters do, even when it wasn’t coming from the deepest emotional place, or perhaps not from the heart at all. It's important to keep this in mind everywhere.
Gray’s fragments of Norse Lore, at any rate, will give one no notion of it;—any more than Pope will of Homer. It is no square-built gloomy palace of black ashlar marble, shrouded in awe and horror, as Gray 271gives it us: no; rough as the North Rocks, as the Iceland deserts, it is; with a heartiness, homeliness, even a tint of good humour and robust mirth in the middle of these fearful things. The strong old Norse heart did not go upon theatrical sublimities; they had not time to tremble. I like much their robust simplicity; their veracity, directness of conception. Thor ‘draws down his brows’ in a veritable Norse rage; ‘grasps his hammer till the knuckles grow white.’ Beautiful traits of pity too, an honest pity. Balder ‘the white God’ dies; the beautiful, benignant; he is the Sungod. They try all Nature for a remedy; but he is dead. Frigga, his mother, sends Hermoder to seek or see him: nine days and nine nights he rides through gloomy deep valleys, a labyrinth of gloom; arrives at the Bridge with its gold roof: the Keeper says, “Yes, Balder did pass here; but the Kingdom of the Dead is down yonder, far towards the North.” Hermoder rides on; leaps Hell-gate, Hela’s gate: does see Balder, and speak with him: Balder cannot be delivered. Inexorable! Hela will not, for Odin or any God, give him up. The beautiful and gentle has to remain there. His Wife had volunteered to go with him, to die with him. They shall forever remain there. He sends his ring to Odin; Nanna his wife sends her thimble to Frigga, as a remembrance—Ah me!—
Gray's snippets of Norse Lore won’t give you any idea of it—just like Pope doesn’t capture Homer. It’s not some imposing, gloomy palace of black stone, cloaked in fear and dread, like Gray presents it; no, it’s as rough as the North Rocks, like the Icelandic deserts, filled with a sense of warmth, comfort, and even a hint of humor and robust joy amid these terrifying elements. The strong old Norse heart didn’t dwell on dramatic grandeur; they didn’t have time to hesitate. I really appreciate their sturdy simplicity, their honesty, and straightforward thinking. Thor ‘furrows his brow’ in genuine Norse rage; ‘grips his hammer until the knuckles turn white.’ There are beautiful moments of compassion too, a sincere pity. Balder ‘the white God’ dies; he is the beautiful, kind one; he is the Sun God. They search all of Nature for a cure, but he is gone. Frigga, his mother, sends Hermoder to find or see him: for nine days and nine nights, he rides through dark, deep valleys, a maze of gloom; he arrives at the Bridge with its golden roof: the Keeper says, “Yes, Balder did pass here; but the Kingdom of the Dead is down there, far to the North.” Hermoder continues; he jumps Hell-gate, Hela’s gate: he sees Balder and talks with him: Balder cannot be rescued. Unyielding! Hela won’t give him up for Odin or any God. The beautiful and gentle must stay there. His wife volunteered to accompany him, to die with him. They will remain there forever. He sends his ring to Odin; Nanna, his wife, sends her thimble to Frigga, as a keepsake—Ah me!—
For indeed Valour is the fountain of Pity too;—of Truth, and all that is great and good in man. The robust homely vigour of the Norse heart attaches one much, in these delineations. Is it not a trait of right honest strength, says Uhland, who has written a fine Essay on Thor, that the Old Norse heart finds its friend in the Thunder-god? That it is not frightened away by his thunder; but finds that Summer-heat, the beautiful noble summer, must and will have thunder withal! The Norse heart loves this Thor and his hammer-bolt; sports with him. Thor is Summer-heat; the god of Peaceable Industry as well as Thunder. He is the Peasant’s friend; his true henchman and attendant is Thialfi, Manual Labour. Thor himself engages in all manner of rough manual work, scorns no business for its plebeianism; is ever and anon travelling to the country 272of the Jötuns, harrying those chaotic Frost-monsters, subduing them, at least straitening and damaging them. There is a great broad humour in some of these things.
For sure, courage is also the source of compassion;—of truth, and everything great and good in humanity. The strong, down-to-earth energy of the Norse heart resonates strongly in these portrayals. Isn’t it a sign of genuine strength, as Uhland notes in his excellent Essay on Thor, that the Old Norse heart connects with the Thunder-god? It is not intimidated by his thunder; instead, it recognizes that summer's warmth, the beautiful and noble summer, inevitably comes with thunder! The Norse heart loves Thor and his hammer; it revels in his presence. Thor represents summer warmth; he embodies peaceful industry as well as thunder. He is the farmer’s ally; his true helper and companion is Thialfi, Manual Labour. Thor himself engages in all sorts of hard physical work, never looks down on a task because it's considered common; he frequently travels to the realm of the Jötuns, attacking those chaotic frost monsters, conquering them, or at least restraining and weakening them. There is a great sense of humor in some of these stories.
Thor, as we saw above, goes to Jötun-land, to seek Hymir’s Caldron, that the Gods may brew beer. Hymir the huge Giant enters, his grey beard all full of hoar-frost; splits pillars with the very glance of his eye; Thor, after much rough tumult, snatches the Pot, claps it on his head; the ‘handles of it reach down to his heels.’ The Norse Skald has a kind of loving sport with Thor. This is the Hymir whose cattle, the critics have discovered, are Icebergs. Huge untutored Brobdignag genius,—needing only to be tamed-down; into Shakspeares, Dantes, Goethes! It is all gone now, that old Norse work,—Thor the Thunder-god changed into Jack the Giant-killer: but the mind that made it is here yet. How strangely things grow, and die, and do not die! There are twigs of that great world-tree of Norse Belief still curiously traceable. This poor Jack of the Nursery, with his miraculous shoes of swiftness, coat of darkness, sword of sharpness, he is one. Hynde Etin, and still more decisively Red Etin of Ireland, in the Scottish Ballads, these are both derived from Norseland; Etin is evidently a Jötun. Nay, Shakspeare’s Hamlet is a twig too of this same world-tree; there seems no doubt of that. Hamlet, Amleth, I find, is really a mythic personage; and his Tragedy, of the poisoned Father, poisoned asleep by drops in his ear, and the rest, is a Norse mythus! Old Saxo, as his wont was, made it a Danish history; Shakspeare, out of Saxo, made it what we see. That is a twig of the world-tree that has grown, I think;—by nature or accident that one has grown!
Thor, as mentioned earlier, heads to Jötun-land to find Hymir’s Cauldron so the Gods can brew beer. The gigantic Hymir enters, his gray beard covered in frost; he can break pillars just by looking at them. After a lot of chaos, Thor grabs the pot and places it on his head; its handles reach down to his heels. The Norse poets have a playful relationship with Thor. This Hymir has cattle that critics have identified as Icebergs. A huge, untamed creative genius—just waiting to be refined into Shakespeares, Dantes, and Goethes! The old Norse work is gone now—Thor the Thunder-god has been transformed into Jack the Giant-Killer: but the creativity behind it still remains. It's fascinating how things grow, fade away, and yet endure! There are still traces of that grand world-tree of Norse Belief. This simple Jack from nursery tales, with his magical shoes that make him swift, his cloak of darkness, and his sharp sword, is one of them. Hynde Etin, and even more clearly, Red Etin of Ireland in Scottish Ballads, both come from Norse lands; Etin clearly refers to a Jötun. Even Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a branch of the same world-tree; this is undeniable. Hamlet, Amleth, turns out to be a mythical figure; and his tragedy, with the poisoned father, who falls asleep from drops in his ear and everything else, is actually a Norse myth! Old Saxo, as usual, turned it into a Danish story; Shakespeare, based on Saxo, created what we know today. That branch of the world-tree has certainly grown;—whether by nature or accident, that one has flourished!
In fact, these old Norse songs have a truth in them, an inward perennial truth and greatness,—as, indeed, all must have that can very long preserve itself by tradition alone. It is a greatness not of mere body and gigantic bulk, but a rude greatness of soul. There is a sublime uncomplaining melancholy traceable in these old hearts. A great free glance into the very deeps of thought. They seem to have seen, these brave old Northmen, what Meditation has taught all men in all 273ages, That this world is after all but a show,—a phenomenon or appearance, no real thing. All deep souls see into that,—the Hindoo Mythologist, the German Philosopher,—the Shakspeare, the earnest Thinker, wherever he may be:
In fact, these old Norse songs carry a truth within them, a deep and lasting truth and greatness—just as anything that survives solely through tradition must have. It's a greatness that's not just about size or physical presence, but a raw greatness of spirit. There’s a profound, uncomplaining sadness evident in these old hearts. They seem to have gained a deep insight into the depths of thought. These brave old Northmen appear to have realized what Meditation has taught everyone across all 273 ages: that this world is ultimately just a performance—a phenomenon or illusion, not a true reality. All profound souls understand this—the Hindu mythologist, the German philosopher, Shakespeare, and any earnest thinker, wherever he may be:
‘We are such stuff as Dreams are made of!’
'We are made of the same stuff as dreams!'
One of Thor’s expeditions, to Utgard (the Outer Garden, central seat of Jötun-land), is remarkable in this respect. Thialfi was with him, and Loke. After various adventures they entered upon Giant-land; wandered over plains, wild uncultivated places, among stones and trees. At nightfall they noticed a house; and as the door, which indeed formed one whole side of the house, was open, they entered. It was a simple habitation; one large hall, altogether empty. They stayed there. Suddenly in the dead of the night loud noises alarmed them. Thor grasped his hammer; stood in the door, prepared for fight. His companions within ran hither and thither in their terror, seeking some outlet in that rude hall; they found a little closet at last, and took refuge there. Neither had Thor any battle: for, lo, in the morning it turned-out that the noise had been only the snoring of a certain enormous but peaceable Giant, the Giant Skrymir, who lay peaceably sleeping near by; and this that they took for a house was merely his Glove, thrown aside there; the door was the Glove-wrist; the little closet they had fled into was the Thumb! Such a glove;—I remark too that it had not fingers as ours have, but only a thumb, and the rest undivided: a most ancient, rustic glove!
One of Thor’s journeys to Utgard (the Outer Garden, the main area of Jötun-land) is notable for this reason. Thialfi was with him, along with Loke. After several adventures, they entered Giant-land; wandering over fields, wild uncharted spaces, among rocks and trees. As night fell, they spotted a house; and since the door, which actually made up one entire side of the house, was open, they went in. It was a simple place; one large hall, completely empty. They decided to stay there. Suddenly, in the dead of night, loud noises startled them. Thor grabbed his hammer and stood in the doorway, ready to fight. His companions inside ran around in terror, trying to find an escape in that rough hall; they eventually discovered a small closet and took cover there. Thor didn’t end up fighting, though; when morning came, it turned out that the noise had just been the snoring of a massive but peaceful Giant, the Giant Skrymir, who was sleeping nearby; and what they thought was a house was actually his Glove, tossed aside. The door was the glove's wrist, and the tiny closet they had hidden in was the Thumb! What a glove it was; I should also mention that it didn’t have fingers like ours, just a thumb, and the rest was all one piece: a very old, rustic glove!
Skrymir now carried their portmanteau all day; Thor, however, had his own suspicions, did not like the ways of Skrymir; determined at night to put an end to him as he slept. Raising his hammer, he struck down into the Giant’s face a right thunderbolt blow, of force to rend rocks. The Giant merely awoke; rubbed his cheek, and said, Did a leaf fall? Again Thor struck, so soon as Skrymir again slept; a better blow than before: but the Giant only murmured, Was that a grain of sand? Thor’s third stroke was with both his hands (the ‘knuckles white’ I suppose), and seemed to dint deep 274into Skrymir’s visage; but he merely checked his snore, and remarked, There must be sparrows roosting in this tree, I think; what is that they have dropt?—At the gate of Utgard, a place so high that you had to ‘strain your neck bending back to see the top of it,’ Skrymir went his ways. Thor and his companions were admitted; invited to take share in the games going on. To Thor, for his part, they handed a drinking-horn; it was a common feat, they told him, to drink this dry at one draught. Long and fiercely, three times over, Thor drank; but made hardly any impression. He was a weak child, they told him; could he lift that Cat he saw there? Small as the feat seemed, Thor with his whole godlike strength could not; he bent-up the creature’s back, could not raise its feet off the ground, could at the utmost raise one foot. Why, you are no man, said the Utgard people; there is an Old Woman that will wrestle you! Thor, heartily ashamed, seized this haggard Old Woman; but could not throw her.
Skrymir carried their suitcase all day, but Thor had his suspicions and didn’t trust Skrymir. At night, he decided to end him while he slept. Raising his hammer, he delivered a powerful strike to the Giant's face that could shatter rocks. The Giant simply woke up, rubbed his cheek, and asked, "Did a leaf fall?" Thor struck again as Skrymir fell back asleep, delivering an even better blow, but the Giant only muttered, "Was that a grain of sand?" For Thor’s third strike, he swung with both hands (his knuckles were probably white) and it seemed to make a deep dent in Skrymir’s face. Yet, the Giant merely paused in his snoring and commented, "I think there are sparrows roosting in this tree; what is that they've dropped?" At the gate of Utgard, which was so tall you had to strain your neck to see the top, Skrymir went on his way. Thor and his companions were let in and invited to join the ongoing games. They handed Thor a drinking horn and told him it was a common challenge to drink it dry in one go. Thor drank long and hard three times but barely made a dent. They told him he was weak and asked if he could lift the Cat over there. Despite its small appearance, Thor, using all his godly strength, could only bend the creature's back and couldn’t lift its feet off the ground, managing to raise only one foot at most. "You’re no man," said the Utgard people; "there’s an old woman who will wrestle you!" Ashamed, Thor grabbed the thin old woman, but he couldn’t throw her.
And now, on their quitting Utgard, the Chief Jötun, escorting them politely a little way, said to Thor: “You are beaten then:—yet be not so much ashamed; there was deception of appearance in it. That Horn you tried to drink was the Sea: you did make it ebb; but who could drink that, the bottomless! The Cat you would have lifted,—why, that is the Midgard-snake, the Great World-serpent, which, tail in mouth, girds and keeps-up the whole created world; had you torn that up, the world must have rushed to ruin! As for the Old Woman, she was Time, Old Age, Duration; with her what can wrestle? No man nor no god with her; gods or men, she prevails over all! And then those three strokes you struck,—look at these three valleys; your three strokes made these!” Thor looked at his attendant Jötun: it was Skrymir;—it was, say Norse critics, the old chaotic rocky Earth in person, and that glove-house was some Earth-cavern! But Skrymir had vanished; Utgard with its skyhigh gates, when Thor grasped his hammer to smite them, had gone to air; only the Giant’s voice was heard mocking: “Better come no more to Jötunheim!”—
And now, as they were leaving Utgard, the Chief Jötun politely escorted them a little way and said to Thor: “So you’ve been beaten—but don’t be too ashamed; there was a trick to it. That Horn you tried to drink from was the Sea: you actually made it recede, but who could drink from something so bottomless? The Cat you wanted to lift—that’s the Midgard-snake, the Great World-serpent, which wraps around and holds together the entire world; if you had pulled that up, the world would have collapsed! And the Old Woman was Time, Old Age, Duration; who can fight against her? No man or god can overcome her; she prevails over everyone! And those three blows you struck—look at these three valleys; your three blows created these!” Thor looked at his attendant Jötun: it was Skrymir;—according to Norse critics, it was the old chaotic rocky Earth in person, and that glove-house was some Earth-cavern! But Skrymir had vanished; Utgard with its towering gates had disappeared into thin air when Thor reached for his hammer to smash them; all that was left was the Giant’s mocking voice: “It’s better you don’t come back to Jötunheim!”—
This is of the allegoric period, as we see, and half 275play, not of the prophetic and entirely devout: but as a mythus is there not real antique Norse gold in it? More true metal, rough from the Mimerstithy, than in many a famed Greek Mythus shaped far better! A great broad Brobdignag grin of true humour is in this Skrymir; mirth resting on earnestness and sadness, as the rainbow on black tempest: only a right valiant heart is capable of that. It is the grim humour of our own Ben Jonson, rare old Ben; runs in the blood of us, I fancy; for one catches tones of it, under a still other shape, out of the American Backwoods.
This is from the allegorical period, as we can see, and it's more of a playful take, not fully prophetic or entirely devout: but isn’t there some genuine ancient Norse gold in it? More true metal, raw from the Mimerstithy, than in many a celebrated Greek myth that is crafted far better! There’s a huge, broad Brobdingnagian grin of true humor in this Skrymir; joy resting on seriousness and sadness, like a rainbow appearing after a dark storm: only a truly brave heart can manage that. It has the grim humor of our own Ben Jonson, the rare old Ben; I think it runs in our blood because you can hear echoes of it, in another form, from the American backwoods.
That is also a very striking conception, that of the Ragnarök, Consummation, or Twilight of the Gods. It is in the Völuspa Song; seemingly a very old, prophetic idea. The Gods and Jötuns, the divine Powers and the chaotic brute ones, after long contest and partial victory by the former, meet at last in universal world-embracing wrestle and duel; World-serpent against Thor, strength against strength; mutually extinctive; and ruin, ‘twilight’ sinking into darkness, swallows the created Universe. The old Universe with its Gods is sunk; but it is not final death: there is to be a new Heaven and a new Earth; a higher supreme God, and Justice to reign among men. Curious: this law of mutation, which also is a law written in man’s inmost thought, had been deciphered by these old earnest Thinkers in their rude style; and how, though all dies, and even gods die, yet all death is but a phœnix fire-death, and new-birth into the Greater and the Better! It is the fundamental Law of Being for a creature made of Time, living in this Place of Hope. All earnest men have seen into it; may still see into it.
That is also a very striking concept, that of the Ragnarök, Consummation, or Twilight of the Gods. It comes from the Völuspa Song; seemingly a very old, prophetic idea. The Gods and Jötuns, the divine Powers and the chaotic brute forces, after a long struggle with partial victories by the former, finally meet in a universal battle; World-serpent against Thor, strength against strength; mutually destructive; and ruin, ‘twilight’ fading into darkness, consumes the created Universe. The old Universe with its Gods is lost; but this is not the end: there will be a new Heaven and a new Earth; a higher supreme God, and Justice will reign among people. It’s interesting: this law of change, which is also a law written in the deepest thoughts of humanity, had been understood by these old serious Thinkers in their simple style; and how, even though everything dies, and even gods die, all death is just a phoenix fire-death, leading to new-birth into something Greater and Better! It is the fundamental Law of Being for a being made of Time, living in this Place of Hope. All earnest people have seen into it; they can still see into it.
And now, connected with this, let us glance at the last mythus of the appearance of Thor; and end there. I fancy it to be the latest in date of all these fables; a sorrowing protest against the advance of Christianity,—set forth reproachfully by some Conservative Pagan. King Olaf has been harshly blamed for his over-zeal in introducing Christianity; surely I should have blamed him far more for an under-zeal in that! He paid dear enough for it; he died by the revolt of his Pagan people, in battle, in the year 1033, at Stickelstad, near that 276Drontheim, where the chief Cathedral of the North has now stood for many centuries, dedicated gratefully to his memory as Saint Olaf. The mythus about Thor is to this effect. King Olaf, the Christian Reform King, is sailing with fit escort along the shore of Norway, from haven to haven; dispensing justice, or doing other royal work: on leaving a certain haven, it is found that a stranger, of grave eyes and aspect, red beard, of stately robust figure, has stept in. The courtiers address him; his answers surprise by their pertinency and depth: at length he is brought to the King. The stranger’s conversation here is not less remarkable, as they sail along the beautiful shore; but after some time, he addresses King Olaf thus: “Yes, King Olaf, it is all beautiful, with the sun shining on it there; green, fruitful, a right fair home for you, and many a sore day had Thor, many a wild fight with the rock Jötuns, before he could make it so. And now you seem minded to put away Thor. King Olaf, have a care!” said the stranger, drawing-down his brows;—and when they looked again, he was nowhere to be found.—This is the last appearance of Thor on the stage of this world!
And now, connected with this, let’s take a look at the last myth of Thor’s appearance and wrap it up. I think this is the latest of all these legends; a mournful protest against the rise of Christianity, presented reproachfully by some traditional Pagan. King Olaf has been harshly criticized for being overly enthusiastic in spreading Christianity; honestly, I would criticize him much more for being too passive about it! He paid a heavy price; he died due to the uprising of his Pagan people, in battle, in the year 1033, at Stickelstad, near that 276 Drontheim, where the main Cathedral of the North has stood for many centuries, dedicated to his memory as Saint Olaf. The myth about Thor goes like this. King Olaf, the Christian Reform King, is sailing with a suitable escort along the coast of Norway, from harbor to harbor; administering justice or doing other royal duties: upon leaving a certain harbor, it is discovered that a stranger, with serious eyes and a red beard, a strong and imposing figure, has stepped on board. The courtiers address him; his responses are surprising for their relevance and depth: eventually, he is brought to the King. The stranger’s conversation here is also remarkable, as they sail along the beautiful shoreline; but after a while, he speaks to King Olaf saying: “Yes, King Olaf, it’s all beautiful, with the sun shining on it; green, fruitful, a very nice home for you, and many a tough day Thor had, many a fierce battle with the rock Jötuns, before he could make it so. And now you seem determined to cast aside Thor. King Olaf, be careful!” said the stranger, furrowing his brows;—and when they looked again, he was nowhere to be found.—This is Thor’s final appearance on the stage of this world!
Do we not see well enough how the Fable might arise, without unveracity on the part of any one? It is the way most Gods have come to appear among men: thus, if in Pindar’s time ‘Neptune was seen once at the Nemean Games,’ what was this Neptune too but a ‘stranger of noble grave aspect,’ fit to be ‘seen’! There is something pathetic, tragic for me in this last voice of Paganism. Thor is vanished, the whole Norse world has vanished; and will not return ever again. In like fashion to that pass away the highest things. All things that have been in this world, all things that are or will be in it, have to vanish, we have our sad farewell to give them.
Don't we see clearly enough how a Fable could come about, without anyone being untruthful? This is how most Gods have come to appear among humans: for instance, if in Pindar's time 'Neptune was seen once at the Nemean Games,' what was this Neptune but a 'stranger with a noble, serious look,' fit to be 'seen'! There’s something deeply sad, tragic for me in this final expression of Paganism. Thor is gone, the entire Norse world has disappeared; and it will never return. In the same way, the highest things will fade away. Everything that has ever existed in this world, everything that is or will be in it, must disappear; we have our sorrowful goodbye to give them.
That Norse Religion, a rude but earnest, sternly impressive Consecration of Valour (so we may define it), sufficed for these old valiant Northmen. Consecration of Valour is not a bad thing! We will take it for good, so far as it goes. Neither is there no use in knowing something about this old Paganism of our Fathers. Unconsciously, and combined with higher 277things, it is in us yet, that old Faith withal! To know it consciously, brings us into closer and clearer relation with the Past—with our own possessions in the Past. For the whole Past, as I keep repeating, is the possession of the Present; the Past had always something true, and is a precious possession. In a different time, in a different place, it is always some other side of our common Human Nature that has been developing itself. The actual True is the sum of all these; not any one of them by itself, constitutes what of Human Nature is hitherto developed. Better to know them all than misknow them. “To which of these Three Religions do you specially adhere?” inquires Meister of his Teacher. “To all the Three!” answers the other: “To all the Three: for they by their union first constitute the True Religion.”
That Norse religion, a rough but sincere and seriously impressive Consecration of Valour (as we might call it), was enough for those brave old Northmen. The Consecration of Valour is not a bad thing! We will take it as good, as far as it goes. There's definitely some value in knowing a bit about the old Paganism of our ancestors. Unbeknownst to us, and mixed with higher 277 ideas, that old faith is still within us! Understanding it consciously brings us into a closer and clearer connection with the Past—it's about recognizing our own heritage in the Past. The entire Past, as I keep saying, is part of what we have in the Present; the Past always contained something true, and it's a valuable possession. In different times and places, it's always another aspect of our shared Human Nature that has been unfolding. The actual True is the sum of all these aspects; none of them alone defines what Human Nature has developed so far. It's better to know them all than to misunderstand them. “Which of these Three Religions do you especially follow?” Meister asks his Teacher. “To all the Three!” the other replies: “To all the Three, for their union is what first makes the True Religion.”
LECTURE II
Lecture 2
THE HERO AS PROPHET. MAHOMET: ISLAM
[Friday, 8th May 1840]
[Friday, May 8, 1840]
From the first rude times of Paganism among the Scandinavians in the North, we advance to a very different epoch of religion, among a very different people: Mahometanism among the Arabs. A great change; what a change and progress is indicated here, in the universal condition and thoughts of men!
From the early, rough days of Paganism in Scandinavia, we move to a completely different era of religion, among a very different group of people: Islam among the Arabs. It's a significant change; look at the shift and progress reflected here in the overall condition and mindset of humanity!
The Hero is not now regarded as a God among his fellowmen; but as one God-inspired, as a prophet. It is the second phasis of Hero-worship; the first or oldest, we may say, has passed away without return; in the history of the world there will not again be any man, never so great, whom his fellowmen will take for a god. Nay we might rationally ask, Did any set of human beings ever really think the man they saw there standing beside them a god, the maker of this world? Perhaps not: it was usually some man they remembered, or had seen. But neither can this any more be. The Great Man is not recognised henceforth as a god any more.
The Hero is no longer seen as a God among his peers; instead, he's regarded as someone inspired by God, like a prophet. This marks the second phase of Hero-worship; the first or oldest phase has faded away without a chance of coming back. In the history of the world, there won't be another person, no matter how great, whom others will consider a god. In fact, one might reasonably ask, did any group of people ever truly believe that the man they saw standing next to them was a god, the creator of this world? Probably not; it was typically someone they remembered or had seen. But that's not possible anymore. The Great Man is no longer recognized as a god.
278It was a rude gross error, that of counting the Great Man a god. Yet let us say that it is at all times difficult to know what he is, or how to account of him and receive him! The most significant feature in the history of an epoch is the manner it has of welcoming a Great Man. Ever, to the true instincts of men, there is something godlike in him. Whether they shall take him to be a god, to be a prophet, or what they shall take him to be? that is ever a grand question; by their way of answering that, we shall see, as through a little window, into the very heart of these men’s spiritual condition. For at bottom the Great Man, as he comes from the hand of nature, is ever the same kind of thing: Odin, Luther, Johnson, Burns; I hope to make it appear that these are all originally of one stuff; that only by the world’s reception of them, and the shapes they assume, are they so immeasurably diverse. The worship of Odin astonishes us—to fall prostrate before the Great Man, into deliquium of love and wonder over him, and feel in their hearts that he was a denizen of the skies, a god! This was imperfect enough: but to welcome, for example, a Burns as we did, was that what we can call perfect? The most precious gift that Heaven can give to the Earth; a man of ‘genius’ as we call it: the Soul of a Man actually sent down from the skies with a God’s-message to us—this we waste away as an idle artificial firework, sent to amuse us a little, and sink it into ashes, wreck and ineffectuality: such reception of a Great Man I do not call very perfect either! Looking into the heart of the thing, one may perhaps call that of Burns a still uglier phenomenon, betokening still sadder imperfections in mankind’s ways, than the Scandinavian method itself! To fall into mere unreasoning deliquium of love and admiration, was not good; but such unreasoning, nay irrational supercilious no-love at all is perhaps still worse!—It is a thing forever changing, this of Hero-worship: different in each age, difficult to do well in any age. Indeed, the heart of the whole business of the age, one may say, is to do it well.
278It was a major mistake to regard the Great Man as a god. However, it's always tough to really understand who he is or how to embrace him! The most telling aspect of any era is how it welcomes a Great Man. To those with true intuition, there’s something divine about him. Whether they see him as a god, a prophet, or something else entirely is a crucial question; their answer gives us insight into their spiritual state. Fundamentally, the Great Man, as he is created by nature, is always essentially the same: Odin, Luther, Johnson, Burns; I aim to show that they all originate from the same core; it's only through society’s reaction and the forms they take that they appear so vastly different. The worship of Odin astonishes us—bowing down before the Great Man, overwhelmed with love and awe for him, believing deep down that he belongs to the heavens, a god! This was far from perfect: but did we truly welcome a Burns in the right way? The greatest gift Heaven can offer to Earth; a man of ‘genius’ as we put it: the Spirit of a Man actually sent down with a divine message for us—yet we squander this gift as if it were a trivial firework meant to entertain us briefly, only for it to fade into nothingness, ruin, and ineffectiveness: that kind of reception for a Great Man isn’t what I’d call perfect either! If we look closer at this, one might argue that the reception of Burns presents an even uglier picture, reflecting even deeper flaws in humanity than the Scandinavian approach! To fall into a blind adoration and admiration wasn’t right; but such blind, even irrational, disdain might be even worse!—Hero-worship is always shifting, varying from age to age, and it's tricky to get it right in any era. In fact, one could say that the essence of our time is to do it well.
We have chosen Mahomet not as the most eminent Prophet, but as the one we are freest to speak of. He 279is by no means the truest of Prophets; but I do esteem him a true one. Farther, as there is no danger of our becoming, any of us, Mahometans, I mean to say all the good of him I justly can. It is the way to get at his secret: let us try to understand what he meant with the world; what the world meant and means with him, will then be a more answerable question. Our current hypotheses about Mahomet, that he was a scheming Impostor, a Falsehood incarnate, that his religion is a mere mass of quackery and fatuity, begins really to be now untenable to any one. The lies, which well-meaning zeal has heaped round this man, are disgraceful to ourselves only. When Pococke inquired of Grotius, Where the proof was of that story of the pigeon, trained to pick peas from Mahomet’s ear, and pass for an angel dictating to him? Grotius answered that there was no proof! It is really time to dismiss all that. The word this man spoke has been the life-guidance now of a hundred-and-eighty millions of men these twelve-hundred years. These hundred-and-eighty millions were made by God as well as we. A greater number of God’s creatures believe in Mahomet’s word at this hour than in any other word whatever. Are we to suppose that it was a miserable piece of spiritual legerdemain, this which so many creatures of the Almighty have lived by and died by? I, for my part, cannot form any such supposition. I will believe most things sooner than that. One would be entirely at a loss what to think of this world at all, if quackery so grew and were sanctioned here.
We chose Muhammad not because he’s the most prominent Prophet, but because we can speak about him more freely. He is certainly not the most truthful of Prophets, but I consider him to be a true one. Furthermore, since there’s no risk of any of us becoming Muslims, I intend to highlight all the good in him that I can. This is the way to uncover his essence: let’s try to understand what he meant to the world; what the world meant and means to him will then be a more relevant question. Our current beliefs about Muhammad—that he was a scheming fraud, an embodiment of falsehood, and that his religion is just a jumble of nonsense and folly—are becoming untenable for anyone now. The falsehoods, which well-meaning zealots have piled onto this man, only serve to shame us. When Pococke asked Grotius where the evidence was for the story of the pigeon that supposedly picked peas from Muhammad’s ear and posed as an angel dictating to him, Grotius replied that there was no evidence! It’s really time to put all that to rest. The words this man spoke have guided the lives of one hundred and eighty million people for the last twelve hundred years. These hundred and eighty million were created by God just like us. More of God’s creatures believe in Muhammad’s words right now than any other words in existence. Are we to think that this was some pathetic trickery that so many of the Almighty’s beings have lived and died by? I, for one, cannot entertain such a notion. I would rather believe almost anything than that. One would be completely lost in understanding this world if such deceit proliferated and was accepted here.
Alas, such theories are very lamentable. If we would attain to knowledge of anything in God’s true Creation, let us disbelieve them wholly! They are the product of an Age of Scepticism; they indicate the saddest spiritual paralysis, and mere death-life of the souls of men: more godless theory, I think, was never promulgated in this Earth. A false man found a religion? Why, a false man cannot build a brick house! If he do not know and follow truly the properties of mortar, burnt clay and what else he works in, it is no house that he makes, but a rubbish-heap. It will not stand for twelve centuries, to lodge a hundred-and-eighty millions; it will 280fall straightway. A man must conform himself to Nature’s laws, be verily in communion with Nature and the truth of things, or Nature will answer him, No, not at all! Speciosities are specious—ah, me!—a Cagliostro, many Cagliostros, prominent world-leaders, do prosper by their quackery, for a day. It is like a forged bank-note; they get it passed out of their worthless hands: others, not they, have to smart for it. Nature bursts-up in fire-flame, French Revolutions and suchlike, proclaiming with terrible veracity that forged notes are forged.
Unfortunately, such theories are really unfortunate. If we want to gain knowledge of anything in God’s true Creation, we should completely disbelieve them! They are a product of an Age of Skepticism; they reflect the saddest spiritual paralysis and the mere death of people's souls: I think no godless theory has ever been introduced on this Earth. A dishonest person founds a religion? Well, a dishonest person cannot build a brick house! If he doesn’t truly understand and follow the properties of mortar, burnt clay, and whatever else he’s working with, he won’t make a house but a pile of junk. It won’t last for twelve centuries to accommodate one hundred eighty million people; it will collapse right away. A man must align himself with Nature’s laws, truly be in communion with Nature and the truth of things, or Nature will respond to him, “No, not at all!” False appearances are deceptive—oh, how sad!—many quacks, like Cagliostro and other prominent world leaders, can prosper from their deceit for a time. It’s like a counterfeit banknote; they pass it off from their worthless hands: others, not them, have to pay for it. Nature erupts in flames, French Revolutions, and similar events, proclaiming with terrible truth that counterfeit notes are indeed forged.
But of a Great Man especially, of him I will venture to assert that it is incredible he should have been other than true. It seems to me the primary foundation of him, and of all that can lie in him, this. No Mirabeau, Napoleon, Burns, Cromwell, no man adequate to do anything, but is first of all in right earnest about it; what I call a sincere man. I should say sincerity, a deep, great, genuine sincerity, is the first characteristic of all men in any way heroic. Not the sincerity that calls itself sincere; ah, no, that is a very poor matter indeed;—a shallow braggart conscious sincerity; oftenest self-conceit mainly. The Great Man’s sincerity is of the kind he cannot speak of, is not conscious of: nay, I suppose, he is conscious rather of insincerity; for what man can walk accurately by the law of truth for one day? No, the Great Man does not boast himself sincere, far from that; perhaps does not ask himself if he is so: I would say rather, his sincerity does not depend on himself; he cannot help being sincere! The great Fact of Existence is great to him. Fly as he will, he cannot get out of the awful presence of this Reality. His mind is so made; he is great by that, first of all. Fearful and wonderful, real as Life, real as death, is this Universe to him. Though all men should forget its truth, and walk in a vain show, he cannot. At all moments the Flame-image glares-in upon him; undeniable, there, there!—I wish you to take this as my primary definition of a Great Man. A little man may have this, it is competent to all men that God has made: but a Great Man cannot be without it.
But when it comes to a Great Man, especially, I dare say it’s hard to believe he could be anything but genuine. To me, that’s the core of who he is, and everything that lies within him. No Mirabeau, Napoleon, Burns, or Cromwell, no man capable of achieving anything, is not first and foremost completely serious about it; what I mean is a sincere man. I'd say sincerity, a deep, profound, and genuine sincerity, is the top trait of all men who are in any way heroic. Not the sort of sincerity that boasts about itself; oh no, that's really quite trivial—a shallow, self-important claim to sincerity; often just self-conceit. The Great Man’s sincerity is the kind he doesn’t talk about, the kind he isn’t even aware of: in fact, I think he’s more aware of insincerity; because what man can consistently navigate the law of truth for even a single day? No, the Great Man doesn’t brag about being sincere, far from it; perhaps he doesn’t even question if he is: I’d argue rather that his sincerity doesn’t rely on his awareness; he can’t help but be sincere! The profound truth of Existence is significant to him. No matter how he tries to escape, he can’t evade the imposing presence of this Reality. His mind is structured that way; that’s what makes him great, above all else. This Universe is as fearful and wonderful, as real as Life, as real as death, to him. Even if everyone else forgets its truth and lives in a meaningless illusion, he cannot. Every moment, the Flame-image is glaring at him; undeniable, there it is!—I want you to accept this as my primary definition of a Great Man. A small man might have this trait; it’s something all people created by God can possess: but a Great Man cannot exist without it.
Such a man is what we call an original man: he comes 281to us at first-hand. A messenger he, sent from the Infinite Unknown with tidings to us. We may call him Poet, Prophet, God;—in one way or other, we all feel that the words he utters are as no other man’s words. Direct from the Inner Fact of things;—he lives, and has to live, in daily communion with that. Hearsays cannot hide it from him; he is blind, homeless, miserable, following hearsays; it glares-in upon him. Really his utterances, are they not a kind of ‘revelation;’—what we must call such for want of some other name? It is from the heart of the world that he comes; he is portion of the primal reality of things. God has made many revelations: but this man too, has not God made him, the latest and newest of all? The ‘inspiration of the Almighty giveth him understanding:’ we must listen before all to him.
Such a man is what we refer to as an original man: he comes to us directly. He’s like a messenger sent from the Infinite Unknown with news for us. We might call him Poet, Prophet, or God; in one way or another, we all sense that the words he speaks are unlike anyone else’s words. He communicates directly from the fundamental truth of things; he lives, and must live, in constant connection with that. Secondhand information can’t obscure it from him; he feels lost, homeless, and wretched, following what others say; it shines brightly in upon him. Truly, his words are they not a kind of ‘revelation;’—what else can we call it when we lack another term? He comes from the heart of the world; he is part of the primal reality of existence. God has made many revelations: but hasn’t God also created him, the latest and newest of all? The ‘inspiration of the Almighty gives him understanding:’ we must listen to him above all others.
This Mahomet, then, we will in no wise consider as an Inanity and Theatricality, a poor conscious ambitious schemer; we cannot conceive him so. The rude message he delivered was a real one withal; an earnest confused voice from the unknown Deep. The man’s words were not false, nor his workings here below; no Inanity and Simulacrum; a fiery mass of Life cast-up from the great bosom of Nature herself. To kindle the world; the world’s Maker had ordered it so. Neither can the faults, imperfections, insincerities even, of Mahomet, if such were never so well proved against him, shake this primary fact about him.
This Muhammad, then, we won't see as a trivial or theatrical figure, a mediocre, self-serving schemer; we can't think of him that way. The blunt message he delivered was real; it was a sincere, muddled voice from the unknown depths. The man’s words weren’t false, nor were his actions on this earth; it’s not trivial or fake; it’s a fiery surge of life brought forth from the great essence of Nature itself. To ignite the world; the world’s Creator had decreed it so. The faults, imperfections, and even insincerities of Muhammad, if such were ever convincingly demonstrated against him, cannot undermine this fundamental truth about him.
On the whole, we make too much of faults; the details of the business hide the real centre of it. Faults? The greatest of faults, I should say, is to be conscious of none. Readers of the Bible above all, one would think, might know better. Who is called there ‘the man according to God’s own heart’? David, the Hebrew King, had fallen into sins enough; blackest crimes; there was no want of sins. And thereupon the unbelievers sneer and ask, Is this your man according to God’s own heart? The sneer, I must say, seems to me but a shallow one. What are faults, what are the outward details of a life; if the inner secret of it, the remorse, temptations, true, often-baffled, never-ended struggle of it, be forgotten? ‘It is not in man that 282walketh to direct his steps.’ Of all acts, is not, for a man, repentance the most divine? The deadliest sin, I say, were that same supercilious consciousness of no sin;—that is death; the heart so conscious is divorced from sincerity, humility and fact; is dead: it is ‘pure’ as dead dry sand is pure. David’s life and history, as written for us in those Psalms of his, I consider to be the truest emblem ever given of a man’s moral progress and warfare here below. All earnest souls will ever discern in it the faithful struggle of an earnest human soul towards what is good and best. Struggle often baffled, sore baffled, down as into entire wreck; yet a struggle never ended; ever, with tears, repentance, true unconquerable purpose, begun anew. Poor human nature! Is not a man’s walking, in truth, always that: ‘a succession of falls’? Man can do no other. In this wild element of a Life, he has to struggle onwards; now fallen, deep-abased; and ever, with tears, repentance, with bleeding heart, he has to rise again, struggle again still onwards. That his struggle be a faithful unconquerable one: that is the question of questions. We will put-up with many sad details, if the soul of it were true. Details by themselves will never teach us what it is. I believe we misestimate Mahomet’s faults even as faults: but the secret of him will never be got by dwelling there. We will leave all this behind us; and assuring ourselves that he did mean some true thing, ask candidly what it was or might be.
Overall, we make too much of flaws; the specifics of the situation obscure its real essence. Flaws? The biggest flaw, in my opinion, is to be unaware of any. Readers of the Bible, above all, should know better. Who is referred to there as ‘the man after God’s own heart’? David, the Hebrew King, committed many sins; serious crimes; there was no shortage of sins. And then the skeptics mockingly ask, Is this your man after God’s own heart? I must say, that mockery seems quite shallow to me. What are flaws, what are the external details of a life, if the inner truth of it—the remorse, temptations, genuine, often thwarted, endless struggle—are ignored? ‘It is not in man that 282 walks to direct his steps.’ Of all actions, is not, for a person, repentance the most divine? I say the deadliest sin is that same arrogant awareness of no sin—that is death; the heart that is so self-righteous is cut off from sincerity, humility, and reality; it is lifeless: it is ‘pure’ like dry sand is pure. I view David’s life and story, as expressed in his Psalms, as the truest symbol of a person’s moral growth and battle here on Earth. All earnest souls will always see in it the genuine struggle of a devoted human heart striving for what is good and best. A struggle often thwarted, deeply so, leading to complete collapse; yet it is a struggle that never ends; ever, with tears, repentance, and a true, indomitable purpose, it begins again. Poor human nature! Is a man’s journey not really just that: ‘a series of falls’? A person can do no other. In this chaotic element of Life, he has to keep pushing forward; sometimes fallen, deeply humbled; and always, with tears and repentance, with a broken heart, he has to rise again, struggle again, and move forward. The question we must ask is whether his struggle is a sincere, unconquerable one: that is the key question. We can tolerate many sad details if the essence of it is true. Details alone will never teach us what it truly is. I believe we misjudge Muhammad’s flaws even as flaws: but the essence of him will never be understood by focusing on that. We will leave all that behind; and assuring ourselves that he did mean something true, we should honestly ask what it was or could be.
These Arabs Mahomet was born among are certainly a notable people. Their country itself is notable; the fit habitation for such a race. Savage inaccessible rock-mountains, great grim deserts, alternating with beautiful strips of verdure: wherever water is, there is greenness, beauty; odoriferous balm-shrubs, date-trees, frankincense-trees. Consider that wide waste horizon of sand, empty, silent, like a sand-sea, dividing habitable place from habitable. You are all alone there, left alone with the Universe; by day a fierce sun blazing down on it with intolerable radiance; by night the great deep Heaven with its stars. Such a country is fit for a swift-handed, deep-hearted race of men. There 283is something most agile, active, and yet most meditative, enthusiastic in the Arab character. The Persians are called the French of the East, we will call the Arabs Oriental Italians. A gifted noble people; a people of wild strong feelings, and of iron restraint over these: the characteristic of noblemindedness, of genius. The wild Bedouin welcomes the stranger to his tent, as one having right to all that is there; were it his worst enemy, he will slay his foal to treat him, will serve him with sacred hospitality for three days, will set him fairly on his way;—and then, by another law as sacred, kill him if he can. In words too, as in action. They are not a loquacious people, taciturn rather; but eloquent, gifted when they do speak. An earnest truthful kind of men. They are, as we know, of Jewish kindred: but with that deadly terrible earnestness of the Jews they seem to combine something graceful, brilliant, which is not Jewish. They had ‘Poetic contests’ among them before the time of Mahomet. Sale says, at Ocadh, in the South of Arabia, there were yearly fairs, and there, when the merchandising was done, Poets sang for prizes:—the wild people gathered to hear that.
These Arabs among whom Muhammad was born are certainly a remarkable people. Their land is notable as well; it's a fitting home for such a race. Rugged, inaccessible mountains and vast, desolate deserts alternate with beautiful patches of greenery: wherever there’s water, there’s life, beauty, aromatic balm shrubs, date palms, and frankincense trees. Consider the wide horizon of sand, empty and silent like a sea of sand, separating habitable areas from the barren. Out there, you are utterly alone, left to face the Universe; by day, a fierce sun beats down with unbearable brightness; by night, the vast deep sky adorned with its stars. Such a country is suited for a swift, passionate race of people. There is something incredibly lively, active, yet deeply contemplative and enthusiastic in the Arab character. The Persians are often called the French of the East; we might refer to the Arabs as the Oriental Italians. They are a gifted and noble people, full of intense emotions, but with a remarkable ability to restrain them—a hallmark of nobleness and genius. The wild Bedouin welcomes a stranger to his tent as if he has a right to everything there; even if it’s his worst enemy, he will slaughter his foal to host him, offering him sacred hospitality for three days, ensuring he sets off safely on his journey;—and then, by another sacred law, will kill him if he can. In conversation as well as in action, they are not overly talkative, rather reserved; but when they do speak, they are eloquent and gifted. They are earnest and truthful people. They are, as we know, of Jewish descent, but alongside the severe intensity of the Jews, they seem to possess a gracefulness and brilliance that is not typically Jewish. They held ‘Poetic contests’ among themselves before the time of Muhammad. Sale notes that at Ocadh, in the southern part of Arabia, there were annual fairs where, after trading was completed, poets competed for prizes:—the wild people gathered to listen.
One Jewish quality these Arabs manifest; the outcome of many or of all high qualities; what we may call religiosity. From of old they had been zealous workers, according to their light. They worshipped the stars, as Sabeans; worshipped many natural objects,—recognised them as symbols, immediate manifestations, of the Maker of Nature. It was wrong; and yet not wholly wrong. All God’s works are still in a sense symbols of God. Do we not, as I urged, still account it a merit to recognise a certain inexhaustible significance, ‘poetic beauty’ as we name it, in all natural objects whatsoever? A man is a poet, and honoured, for doing that, and speaking or singing it,—a kind of diluted worship. They had many Prophets, these Arabs; Teachers each to his tribe, each according to the light he had. But indeed, have we not from of old the noblest of proofs, still palpable to every one of us, of what devoutness and noblemindedness had dwelt in these rustic thoughtful peoples? Biblical critics seem 284agreed that our own Book of Job was written in that region of the world. I call that, apart from all theories about it, one of the grandest things ever written with pen. One feels, indeed, as if it were not Hebrew; such a noble universality, different from noble patriotism or sectarianism, reigns in it. A noble Book; all men’s Book! It is our first, oldest statement of the never-ending Problem,—man’s destiny, and God’s ways with him here in this earth. And all in such free flowing outlines; grand in its sincerity, in its simplicity; in its epic melody, and repose of reconcilement. There is the seeing eye, the mildly understanding heart. So true everywhere; true eyesight and vision for all things; material things no less than spiritual; the Horse,—‘hast thou clothed his neck with thunder?’—he ‘laughs at the shaking of the spear!’ Such living likenesses were never since drawn. Sublime sorrow, sublime reconciliation: oldest choral melody as of the heart of mankind;—so soft, and great; as the summer midnight, as the world with its seas and stars! There is nothing written, I think, in the Bible or out of it, of equal literary merit.—
One Jewish quality these Arabs show is the result of many, if not all, great qualities—what we might call religiosity. For a long time, they had been dedicated workers, according to their understanding. They worshipped the stars, like the Sabeans, and many natural objects, seeing them as symbols and immediate expressions of the Creator of Nature. It was wrong; yet not entirely wrong. All of God’s works are still, in a sense, reflections of God. Don’t we, as I mentioned, still consider it a virtue to recognize a certain endless significance—what we call ‘poetic beauty’—in all natural objects? A person is celebrated as a poet for doing this and expressing it—kind of a diluted form of worship. These Arabs had many prophets, teachers for each tribe, each according to the insight they had. But haven’t we always had the finest evidence, still clear to each of us, of the devotion and nobility that existed in these thoughtful rural communities? Biblical scholars generally agree that our own Book of Job was written in that part of the world. I regard that, aside from all theories about it, as one of the greatest pieces ever penned. One feels that it isn’t purely Hebrew; it has such a noble universality that transcends noble patriotism or sectarianism. It’s a noble book; a book for all humanity! It is our first and oldest discussion of the never-ending problem—man’s destiny and God’s ways with him here on earth. And it does so with such fluid outlines; grand in its sincerity, simplicity, epic melody, and serene resolution. It features the seeing eye and the gently understanding heart. So true everywhere; genuine insight and vision for all things—material things no less than spiritual. The Horse—‘Have you clothed his neck with thunder?’—he ‘laughs at the shaking of the spear!’ Such vivid representations have never been captured since. Sublime sorrow, sublime reconciliation: the oldest choral melody resonating from the heart of humanity—so soft and vast; like a summer midnight, like the world with its seas and stars! I believe there’s nothing written, in the Bible or outside of it, with equal literary merit.—
To the idolatrous Arabs one of the most ancient universal objects of worship was that Black Stone, still kept in the building called Caabah at Mecca. Diodorus Siculus mentions this Caabah in a way not to be mistaken, as the oldest, most honoured temple in his time; that is, some half-century before our Era. Silvestre de Sacy says there is some likelihood that the Black Stone is an aerolite. In that case, some one might see it fall out of Heaven! It stands now beside the Well Zemzem; the Caabah is built over both. A Well is in all places a beautiful affecting object, gushing out like life from the hard earth;—still more so in these hot dry countries, where it is the first condition of being. The Well Zemzem has its name from the bubbling sound of the waters, zem-zem; they think it is the Well which Hagar found with her little Ishmael in the wilderness: the aerolite and it have been sacred now, and had a Caabah over them, for thousands of years. A curious object, that Caabah! There it stands at this hour, in the black cloth-covering the Sultan sends it yearly; 285‘twenty-seven cubits high;’ with circuit, with double circuit of pillars, with festoon-rows of lamps and quaint ornaments: the lamps will be lighted again this night,—to glitter again under the stars. An authentic fragment of the oldest Past. It is the Keblah of all Moslem: from Delhi all onwards to Morocco, the eyes of innumerable praying men are turned towards it, five times, this day and all days: one of the notablest centres in the Habitation of Men.
To the idol-worshipping Arabs, one of the oldest universal objects of worship was the Black Stone, still housed in the building known as the Kaabah in Mecca. Diodorus Siculus refers to the Kaabah as the oldest, most revered temple of his time, which was about fifty years before our era. Silvestre de Sacy suggests that the Black Stone might be an aerolite. If that's true, someone could actually see it fall from the sky! It now stands next to the Well of Zamzam; the Kaabah is built over both. A well is always a beautiful and touching sight, springing forth like life from the hard ground—especially in these hot, dry countries where water is essential for survival. The Well of Zamzam gets its name from the bubbling sound of the water, "zem-zem"; it's believed to be the well that Hagar discovered with her young son Ishmael in the wilderness. Both the aerolite and the well have been sacred and have had a Kaabah over them for thousands of years. What a fascinating sight the Kaabah is! It stands today, draped in the black cloth sent by the Sultan every year; it's “twenty-seven cubits high,” with a circuit of pillars and rows of lamps with intricate decorations. The lamps will be lit again tonight—sparkling under the stars once more. It’s an authentic piece of the oldest past. It is the Qibla for all Muslims: from Delhi to Morocco, the eyes of countless praying individuals are directed toward it, five times a day, today and every day: one of the most significant centers in the habitation of humanity.
It had been from the sacredness attached to this Caabah Stone and Hagar’s Well, from the pilgrimings of all tribes of Arabs thither, that Mecca took its rise as a Town. A great town once, though much decayed now. It has no natural advantage for a town; stands in a sandy hollow amid bare barren hills, at a distance from the sea; its provisions, its very bread, have to be imported. But so many pilgrims needed lodgings: and then all places of pilgrimage do, from the first, become places of trade. The first day pilgrims meet, merchants have also met: where men see themselves assembled for one object, they find that they can accomplish other objects which depend on meeting together. Mecca became the Fair of all Arabia. And thereby indeed the chief staple and warehouse of whatever Commerce there was between the Indian and Western countries, Syria, Egypt, even Italy. It had at one time a population of 100,000; buyers, forwarders of those Eastern and Western products; importers for their own behoof of provisions and corn. The government was a kind of irregular aristocratic republic, not without a touch of theocracy. Ten Men of a chief tribe, chosen in some rough way, were Governors of Mecca, and Keepers of the Caabah. The Koreish were the chief tribe in Mahomet’s time; his own family was of that tribe. The rest of the Nation, fractioned and cut-asunder by deserts, lived under similar rude patriarchal governments by one or several: herdsmen, carriers, traders, generally robbers too; being oftenest at war one with another, or with all: held together by no open bond, if it were not this meeting at the Caabah, where all forms of Arab Idolatry assembled in common adoration;—held mainly by the inward indissoluble bond of 286a common blood and language. In this way had the Arabs lived for long ages, unnoticed by the world: a people of great qualities, unconsciously waiting for the day when they should become notable to all the world. Their Idolatries appear to have been in a tottering state; much was getting into confusion and fermentation among them. Obscure tidings of the most important Event ever transacted in this world, the Life and Death of the Divine Man in Judea, at once the symptom and cause of immeasurable change to all people in the world, had in the course of centuries reached into Arabia too; and could not but, of itself, have produced fermentation there.
It was the sacred significance of the Kaaba Stone and Hagar’s Well, along with the pilgrimages of all the Arab tribes, that led to the establishment of Mecca as a town. Once a thriving city, though it has greatly declined now. It has no natural advantages; it sits in a sandy low area surrounded by barren hills, far from the sea; its food, even its bread, has to be brought in. But so many pilgrims needed places to stay, and every place of pilgrimage tends to evolve into a trade hub. On the first day that pilgrims gather, merchants also show up: when people come together for one purpose, they often find they can achieve other goals through their interactions. Mecca became the marketplace for all of Arabia. Thus, it became the main hub and storage center for whatever trade existed between the East and the West, including Syria, Egypt, and even Italy. At one point, it had a population of 100,000; buyers and shippers of Eastern and Western goods; importers of food and grain for themselves. The local government functioned as a kind of irregular aristocratic republic, with a bit of theocracy mixed in. Ten men from a leading tribe, chosen in a rough manner, acted as governors of Mecca and guardians of the Kaaba. The Quraysh tribe was the dominant tribe during Muhammad’s time; his family belonged to that tribe. The rest of the nation, fragmented and scattered across deserts, lived under similar rough patriarchal governments run by one or several leaders: herders, carriers, traders, and often robbers; frequently at war with each other or with everyone; they were connected by no formal bond, except for gathering at the Kaaba, where various forms of Arab idol worship took place in a shared venerance;—held primarily by the inner unbreakable bond of a common blood and language. This is how the Arabs had lived for many ages, unnoticed by the world: a people with great qualities, unknowingly waiting for the day they would become known to everyone. Their idolatries seemed to be in a precarious state; much confusion and unrest was stirring among them. Subtle news of the most significant event in history, the life and death of the Divine Man in Judea, which was both a sign and a catalyst for immense change for all people, had, over the centuries, reached Arabia too; and it would have inevitably sparked turmoil there.
It was among this Arab people, so circumstanced, in the year 570 of our Era, that the man Mahomet was born. He was of the family of Hashem, of the Koreish tribe as we said; though poor, connected with the chief persons of his country.
It was among this Arab people, in these circumstances, in the year 570 of our Era, that the man Muhammad was born. He belonged to the Hashem family, part of the Quraysh tribe as mentioned; although he was poor, he was related to the prominent figures in his community.
Almost at his birth he lost his Father; at the age of six years his Mother too, a woman noted for her beauty, her worth and sense: he fell to the charge of his Grandfather, an old man, a hundred years old. A good old man: Mahomet’s Father, Abdallah, had been his youngest favourite son. He saw in Mahomet, with his old life-worn eyes, a century old, the lost Abdallah come back again, all that was left of Abdallah. He loved the little orphan Boy greatly; used to say, They must take care of that beautiful little Boy, nothing in their kindred was more precious than he. At his death, while the boy was still but two years old, he left him in charge to Abu Thaleb the eldest of the Uncles, as to him that now was head of the house. By this Uncle, a just and rational man as everything betokens, Mahomet was brought-up in the best Arab way.
Almost at his birth, he lost his father; at the age of six, he lost his mother too, a woman known for her beauty, worth, and wisdom. He came under the care of his grandfather, an old man a hundred years old. He was a good old man: Muhammad’s father, Abdullah, had been his youngest favorite son. With his century-old, life-worn eyes, he saw in Muhammad the return of lost Abdullah, all that remained of him. He loved the little orphan boy greatly and would say that they must take care of that beautiful little boy; nothing in their family was more precious than he. At his death, when the boy was still just two years old, he entrusted him to Abu Talib, the eldest of the uncles, as he was now the head of the household. Muhammad was raised by this uncle, a just and reasonable man as everything indicated, in the best Arab way.
Mahomet, as he grew up, accompanied his Uncle on trading journeys and suchlike; in his eighteenth year one finds him a fighter following his Uncle in war. But perhaps the most significant of all his journeys is one we find noted as of some years’ earlier date: a journey to the Fairs of Syria. The young man here first came in contact with a quite foreign world,—with one foreign 287element of endless moment to him: the Christian Religion. I know not what to make of that ‘Sergius, the Nestorian Monk,’ whom Abu Thaleb and he are said to have lodged with; or how much any monk could have taught one still so young. Probably enough it is greatly exaggerated, this of the Nestorian Monk. Mahomet was only fourteen; had no language but his own: much in Syria must have been a strange unintelligible whirlpool to him. But the eyes of the lad were open; glimpses of many things would doubtless be taken-in, and lie very enigmatic as yet, which were to ripen in a strange way into views, into beliefs and insights one day. These journeys to Syria were probably the beginning of much to Mahomet.
As Mahomet grew up, he went on trading trips with his uncle and, by the age of eighteen, he was a fighter alongside him in battle. However, perhaps the most significant journey he took was noted as occurring a few years earlier: a trip to the Fairs of Syria. It was here that the young man first encountered a completely foreign world—especially one significant element that would impact him: the Christian Religion. It's unclear what to make of ‘Sergius, the Nestorian Monk,’ with whom Abu Thaleb and he are said to have stayed; or how much any monk could have taught someone so young. It’s likely that the account of the Nestorian Monk is greatly exaggerated. Mahomet was only fourteen at the time and spoke only his own language; much of Syria must have seemed like an incomprehensible whirlwind to him. However, the boy was curious, and he would have absorbed glimpses of many things that, while still puzzling, would eventually develop into beliefs and insights. These trips to Syria likely marked the beginning of much for Mahomet.
One other circumstance we must not forget: that he had no school-learning; of the thing we call school-learning none at all. The art of writing was but just introduced into Arabia; it seems to be the true opinion that Mahomet never could write! Life in the Desert, with its experiences, was all his education. What of this infinite Universe he, from his dim place, with his own eyes and thoughts, could take in, so much and no more of it was he to know. Curious, if we will reflect on it, this of having no books. Except by what he could see for himself, or hear of by uncertain rumour of speech in the obscure Arabian Desert, he could know nothing. The wisdom that had been before him or at a distance from him in the world, was in a manner as good as not there for him. Of the great brother souls, flame-beacons through so many lands and times, no one directly communicates with this great soul. He is alone there, deep down in the bosom of the Wilderness; has to grow up so,—alone with Nature and his own Thoughts.
One other thing we shouldn’t forget is that he had no formal education; he didn’t have any of what we call school learning at all. The art of writing had only just been introduced in Arabia; it's widely believed that Muhammad couldn’t write! Life in the Desert, with all its experiences, was his only education. Whatever he could understand about this vast Universe, from his limited viewpoint, with his own eyes and thoughts, that was all he could know. It’s interesting to think about—having no books. He could only learn from what he could see himself or hear through unreliable rumors in the obscure Arabian Desert; he couldn't know anything else. The wisdom that existed before him or far away in the world was practically nonexistent for him. Among the great souls who shone brightly across different lands and times, none directly connect with this profound soul. He is alone there, deep in the heart of the Wilderness, growing up isolated with Nature and his own thoughts.
But, from an early age, he had been remarked as a thoughtful man. His companions named him ‘Al Amin, The Faithful.’ A man of truth and fidelity; true in what he did, in what he spake and thought. They noted that he always meant something. A man rather taciturn in speech; silent when there was nothing to be said; but pertinent, wise, sincere, when he did speak; always throwing light on the matter. This is 288the only sort of speech worth speaking! Through life we find him to have been regarded as an altogether solid, brotherly, genuine man. A serious, sincere character; yet amiable, cordial, companionable, jocose even;—a good laugh in him withal: there are men whose laugh is as untrue as anything about them; who cannot laugh. One hears of Mahomet’s beauty: his fine sagacious honest face, brown florid complexion, beaming black eyes;—I somehow like too that vein on the brow, which swelled-up black when he was in anger: like the ‘horse-shoe vein’ in Scott’s Redgauntlet. It was a kind of feature in the Hashem family, this black swelling vein in the brow; Mahomet had it prominent, as would appear. A spontaneous, passionate, yet just, true-meaning man! Full of wild faculty, fire and light: of wild worth, all uncultured; working out his life-task in the depths of the Desert there.
But from a young age, people noticed that he was a thoughtful man. His friends called him ‘Al Amin, The Faithful.’ He was a man of truth and loyalty; honest in what he did, said, and thought. They recognized that he always had a purpose. He was somewhat quiet; he didn't speak when there was nothing to say; but when he did speak, it was relevant, wise, and sincere, always shedding light on the topic. This is 288 the only kind of speech worth saying! Throughout his life, he was seen as a truly solid, brotherly, genuine man. A serious, sincere character; yet friendly, warm, sociable, even humorous—a man with a good laugh. There are men whose laughter is as false as anything about them; who simply cannot laugh. There are mentions of Mahomet’s beauty: his sharp, honest face, brown glowing complexion, shining black eyes;—I also find the vein on his forehead, which would swell black when he was angry, intriguing: like the ‘horse-shoe vein’ in Scott’s Redgauntlet. This black swelling vein in the forehead was a trait in the Hashem family; Mahomet had it prominently, as it seems. A spontaneous, passionate, yet just, true-to-himself man! Full of raw talent, energy, and brightness: of untamed worth, all unrefined, working out his life’s purpose in the depths of the Desert there.
How he was placed with Kadijah, a rich Widow, as her Steward, and travelled in her business, again to the Fairs of Syria; how he managed all, as one can well understand, with fidelity, adroitness; how her gratitude, her regard for him grew: the story of their marriage is altogether a graceful intelligible one, as told us by the Arab authors. He was twenty-five; she forty, though still beautiful. He seems to have lived in a most affectionate, peaceable, wholesome way with this wedded benefactress; loving her truly, and her alone. It goes greatly against the impostor theory, the fact that he lived in this entirely unexceptionable, entirely quiet and commonplace way, till the heat of his years was done. He was forty before he talked of any mission from Heaven. All his irregularities, real and supposed, date from after his fiftieth year, when the good Kadijah died. All his ‘ambition,’ seemingly, had been, hitherto, to live an honest life; his ‘fame,’ the mere good opinion of neighbours that knew him, had been sufficient hitherto. Not till he was already getting old, the prurient heat of his life all burnt out, and peace growing to be the chief thing this world could give him, did he start on the ‘career of ambition;’ and, belying all his past character and existence, set-up as a wretched empty charlatan to acquire what he could now no longer 289enjoy! For my share, I have no faith whatever in that.
How he was placed with Kadijah, a wealthy widow, as her steward and traveled in her business, again to the fairs of Syria; how he managed everything with loyalty and skill; how her gratitude and fondness for him grew: the story of their marriage is quite a graceful and clear one, as told by the Arab authors. He was twenty-five; she was forty, though still beautiful. He seems to have lived in a very affectionate, peaceful, and wholesome way with this married benefactor, truly loving her and no one else. It significantly contradicts the impostor theory that he lived in this entirely respectable, quiet, and ordinary way until he was past the heat of his youth. He was forty before he talked about any mission from Heaven. All his real or alleged irregularities began after his fiftieth year when the good Kadijah passed away. Up until then, all his "ambition" appeared to be to lead an honest life; his "fame," simply the good opinion of the neighbors who knew him, had been enough for him up to that point. Not until he was getting older, with the passionate intensity of his youth all burned out, and peace becoming the main thing this world could offer him, did he embark on a "career of ambition;" and, contradicting all his past character and existence, presented himself as a pathetic empty charlatan to gain what he could no longer enjoy! For my part, I have no faith in that at all.
Ah no: this deep-hearted Son of the Wilderness, with his beaming black eyes and open social deep soul, had other thoughts in him than ambition. A silent great soul; he was one of those who cannot but be in earnest; whom Nature herself has appointed to be sincere. While others walk in formulas and hearsays, contented enough to dwell there, this man could not screen himself in formulas; he was alone with his own soul and the reality of things. The great Mystery of Existence, as I said, glared-in upon him, with its terrors, with its splendours; no hearsays could hide that unspeakable fact, “Here am I!” Such sincerity, as we named it, has in very truth something of divine. The word of such a man is a Voice direct from Nature’s own Heart. Men do and must listen to that as to nothing else;—all else is wind in comparison. From of old, a thousand thoughts, in his pilgrimings and wanderings, had been in this man: What am I? What is this unfathomable Thing I live in, which men name Universe? What is Life; what is Death? What am I to believe? What am I to do? The grim rocks of Mount Hara, of Mount Sinai, the stern sandy solitudes answered not. The great Heaven rolling silent overhead, with its blue-glancing stars, answered not. There was no answer. The man’s own soul, and what of God’s inspiration dwelt there, had to answer!
Ah no: this deeply passionate Son of the Wilderness, with his bright black eyes and open, genuine soul, had thoughts beyond ambition. A quietly great soul; he was one of those who can only be serious; who Nature herself has destined to be sincere. While others follow formulas and gossip, content to remain there, this man couldn’t hide behind formulas; he was alone with his own soul and the reality of life. The great Mystery of Existence, as I said, confronted him, with its fears, with its wonders; no hearsay could obscure that indescribable truth, “Here I am!” Such sincerity, as we called it, truly has something divine. The word of such a man is a Voice straight from Nature’s own Heart. People listen to that as they do to nothing else;—everything else is just noise in comparison. From long ago, a thousand thoughts, during his travels and wanderings, had filled this man’s mind: What am I? What is this unfathomable Thing I live in, which people call the Universe? What is Life; what is Death? What should I believe? What should I do? The harsh rocks of Mount Hara, of Mount Sinai, the stark sandy silences offered no answers. The vast Heaven rolling silently overhead, with its twinkling blue stars, presented no reply. There was no answer. The man’s own soul, and whatever of God’s inspiration resided there, had to provide the answer!
It is the thing which all men have to ask themselves; which we too have to ask, and answer. This wild man felt it to be of infinite moment; all other things of no moment whatever in comparison. The jargon of argumentative Greek Sects, vague traditions of Jews, the stupid routine of Arab Idolatry, there was no answer in these. A Hero, as I repeat, has this first distinction, which indeed we may call first and last, the Alpha and Omega of his whole Heroism, That he looks through the shows of things into things. Use and wont, respectable hearsay, respectable formula: all these are good, or are not good. There is something behind and beyond all these, which all these must correspond with, be the image of, or they are—Idolatries: ‘bits of black wood 290pretending to be God;’ to the earnest soul a mockery and abomination. Idolatries never so gilded, waited on by heads of the Koreish, will do nothing for this man. Though all men walk by them, what good is it? The great Reality stands glaring there upon him. He there has to answer it, or perish miserably. Now, even now, or else through all Eternity never! Answer it; thou must find an answer.—Ambition? What could all Arabia do for this man; with the crown of Greek Heraclius, of Persian Chosroes, and all crowns in the Earth;—what could they all do for him? It was not of the Earth he wanted to hear tell; it was of the Heaven above and of the Hell beneath. All crowns and sovereignties whatsoever, where would they in a few brief years be? To be Sheik of Mecca or Arabia, and have a bit of gilt wood put into your hand,—will that be one’s salvation? I decidedly think, not. We will leave it altogether, this impostor hypothesis, as not credible; not very tolerable even, worthy chiefly of dismissal by us.
It’s something every person must confront; it’s something we too need to ask and answer. This wild man believed it was of infinite importance; everything else seemed insignificant in comparison. The arguments of Greek philosophers, the vague traditions of the Jews, and the foolish practices of Arab Idolatry provided no answers. A Hero, as I’ve said, has this primary distinction, which we might call both the beginning and the end, the Alpha and Omega of his entire Heroism: he sees beyond the appearances of things into things themselves. Customs and established beliefs, respected opinions, and formulas: these are either valuable or not. There is something deeper and beyond all of these, which they must all align with, reflect, or else they are—Idolatries: ‘pieces of black wood pretending to be God;’ a mockery and an abomination to the sincere soul. No matter how ornate, Idolatries, supported by the leaders of the Koreish, will not help this man. Even if everyone follows them, what good are they? The great Reality stands glaring at him. He must confront it or suffer miserably. Now, at this moment, or else for all Eternity never! He must find an answer. —Ambition? What could all of Arabia offer this man; with the crown of Greek Heraclius, of Persian Chosroes, and all the crowns on Earth—what would any of that do for him? He wasn’t interested in things of the Earth; he sought knowledge of the Heaven above and the Hell below. In a few short years, where would they be? To be Sheik of Mecca or Arabia and hold a piece of gilt wood in your hand—will that be one’s salvation? I firmly believe not. We will completely dismiss this fraudulent idea as implausible; not very bearable even, mainly deserving of dismissal by us.
Mahomet had been wont to retire yearly, during the month Ramadhan, into solitude and silence; as indeed was the Arab custom; a praiseworthy custom, which such a man, above all, would find natural and useful. Communing with his own heart, in the silence of the mountains; himself silent; open to the ‘small still voices:’ it was a right natural custom! Mahomet was in his fortieth year, when having withdrawn to a cavern in Mount Hara, near Mecca, during this Ramadhan, to pass the month in prayer, and meditation on those great questions, he one day told his wife Kadijah, who with his household was with him or near him this year, That by the unspeakable special favour of Heaven he had now found it all out; was in doubt and darkness no longer, but saw it all. That all these Idols and Formulas were nothing, miserable bits of wood; that there was One God in and over all; and we must leave all Idols, and look to Him. That God is great; and that there is nothing else great! He is the Reality. Wooden Idols are not real; He is real. He made us at first, sustains us yet; we and all things are but the 291shadow of Him; a transitory garment veiling the Eternal Splendour. ‘Allah akbar, God is great;’—and then also ‘Islam,’ That we must submit to God. That our whole strength lies in resigned submission to Him, whatsoever He do to us. For this world, and for the other! The thing He sends to us, were it death and worse than death, shall be good, shall be best; we resign ourselves to God.—‘If this be Islam,’ says Goethe, ‘do we not all live in Islam?’ Yes, all of us that have any moral life; we all live so. It has ever been held the highest wisdom for a man not merely to submit to Necessity,—Necessity will make him submit,—but to know and believe well that the stern thing which Necessity had ordered was the wisest, the best, the thing wanted there. To cease his frantic pretension of scanning this great God’s-World in his small fraction of a brain; to know that it had verily, though deep beyond his soundings, a Just Law, that the soul of it was Good;—that his part in it was to conform to the Law of the Whole, and in devout silence follow that; not questioning it, obeying it as unquestionable.
Muhammad used to retreat every year during the month of Ramadan into solitude and silence, which was a common practice among Arabs. It was a commendable tradition that someone like him would find both natural and beneficial. Spending time in contemplation in the quiet of the mountains; he himself silent; open to the 'small still voices'—it was a perfectly natural custom! Muhammad was 40 years old when he withdrew to a cave in Mount Hira, near Mecca, during this Ramadan, to spend the month in prayer and meditation on profound questions. One day he told his wife Khadijah, who was with him and the rest of his household that year, that through an extraordinary grace from Heaven he had finally discovered the truth; he was no longer in doubt or darkness but understood everything clearly. He realized that all these idols and rituals were nothing, merely miserable pieces of wood; that there was One God above all; and that we must abandon all idols and turn to Him. God is great, and nothing else is truly great. He is the Reality. Wooden idols are not real; He is real. He created us initially, continues to sustain us; we and everything else are just the shadow of Him, a temporary covering hiding the Eternal Splendor. ‘Allah akbar,’ God is great;—and also ‘Islam,’ which means we must submit to God. Our entire strength lies in our willingness to submit to Him, no matter what He does to us. Whether in this world or the next! Whatever He sends our way, even if it's death or something worse, it will be good, it will be the best; we surrender ourselves to God.—‘If this is Islam,’ Goethe says, ‘do we not all live in Islam?’ Yes, all of us who have any moral life; we all live this way. It has always been regarded as the highest wisdom for a man not just to endure Necessity—because Necessity will make him submit—but to understand and truly believe that the harsh circumstances which Necessity has imposed are the wisest, the best, the needed ones. To stop his frantic attempts to comprehend this vast God’s-World with his limited intellect; to recognize that it indeed has, though far beyond his understanding, a Just Law, and that the essence of it is Good;—that his role in it is to align himself with the Law of the Whole, and in humble silence follow it; not questioning it, but obeying it as unquestionable.
I say, this is yet the only true morality known. A man is right and invincible, virtuous and on the road towards sure conquest, precisely while he joins himself to the great deep Law of the World, in spite of all superficial laws, temporary appearances, profit-and-loss calculations; he is victorious while he coöperates with that great central Law, not victorious otherwise:—and surely his first chance of coöperating with it, or getting into the course of it, is to know with his whole soul that it is; that it is good, and alone good! This is the soul of Islam; it is properly the soul of Christianity;—for Islam is definable as a confused form of Christianity; had Christianity not been, neither had it been. Christianity also commands us, before all, to be resigned to God. We are to take no counsel with flesh-and-blood; give ear to no vain cavils, vain sorrows and wishes: to know that we know nothing; that the worst and cruelest to our eyes is not what it seems; that we have to receive whatsoever befalls us as sent from God above, and say, It is good and wise, God is great! “Though 292He slay me, yet will I trust in Him.” Islam means in its way Denial of Self, Annihilation of Self. This is yet the highest Wisdom that Heaven has revealed to our Earth.
I believe this is still the only true morality we know. A person is right and unstoppable, virtuous and on the path to certain success, precisely when they align themselves with the profound Law of the Universe, regardless of all superficial laws, temporary appearances, or profit-and-loss calculations; they are victorious when they cooperate with that central Law, and not otherwise:—and surely their first chance to cooperate with it, or get in line with it, is to know with their whole being that it is; that it is good, and the only good! This is the essence of Islam; it is essentially the essence of Christianity;—because Islam can be defined as a confused version of Christianity; had Christianity not existed, neither would Islam. Christianity also commands us, above all else, to be resigned to God. We shouldn’t seek advice from human opinions; we should ignore useless arguments, futile sorrows, and wishes: we must recognize that we know nothing; that what seems the worst and cruelest to us is not what it appears; that we must accept whatever happens to us as a message from God above, and say, It is good and wise, God is great! “Though 292He slay me, yet will I trust in Him.” Islam signifies, in its own way, Denial of Self, Annihilation of Self. This is still the highest Wisdom that Heaven has revealed to our Earth.
Such light had come, as it could, to illuminate the darkness of this wild Arab soul. A confused dazzling, splendour as of life and Heaven, in the great darkness which threatened to be death: he called it revelation and the angel Gabriel;—who of us yet can know what to call it? It is the ‘inspiration of the Almighty that giveth us understanding.’ To know; to get into the truth of anything, is ever a mystic act,—of which the best Logics can but babble on the surface. ‘Is not Belief the true god-announcing Miracle?’ says Novalis.—That Mahomet’s whole soul, set in flame with this grand Truth vouchsafed him, should feel as if it were important and the only important thing, was very natural. That Providence had unspeakably honoured him by revealing it, saving him from death and darkness; that he therefore was bound to make known the same to all creatures: this is what was meant by ‘Mahomet is the Prophet of God;’ this too is not without its true meaning.—
Such light had come, as it could, to illuminate the darkness of this wild Arab soul. A confusing, dazzling brilliance, like life and Heaven, in the great darkness that threatened to be death: he called it revelation and the angel Gabriel;—who of us can truly know what to call it? It is the ‘inspiration of the Almighty that gives us understanding.’ To know; to grasp the truth of anything is always a mystical act,—of which the best Logics can only skim the surface. ‘Isn't Belief the true god-announcing Miracle?’ says Novalis.—That Mahomet’s entire soul, ignited by this grand Truth bestowed upon him, should feel that it was significant and the only significant thing, was very natural. That Providence had indescribably honored him by revealing it, saving him from death and darkness; that he was therefore obliged to share it with all beings: this is what was meant by ‘Mahomet is the Prophet of God;’ this too holds its own true meaning.—
The good Kadijah, we can fancy, listened to him with wonder, with doubt: at length she answered: Yes, it was true this that he said. One can fancy too the boundless gratitude of Mahomet; and how of all the kindnesses she had done him, this of believing the earnest struggling word he now spoke was the greatest. ‘It is certain,’ says Novalis, ‘my Conviction gains infinitely, the moment another soul will believe in it.’ It is a boundless favour.—He never forgot this good Kadijah. Long afterwards, Ayesha his young favourite wife, a woman who indeed distinguished herself among the Moslem, by all manner of qualities, through her whole long life; this young brilliant Ayesha was, one day, questioning him: “Now am not I better than Kadijah? She was a widow; old, and had lost her looks: you love me better than you did her?”—“No, by Allah!” answered Mahomet: “No, by Allah! She believed in me when none else would believe. In the whole world I had but one friend, and she was 293that!”—Seid, his Slave, also believed in him; these with his young Cousin Ali, Abu Thaleb’s son, were his first converts.
The good Kadijah, we can imagine, listened to him with wonder and doubt. Eventually, she replied: Yes, what he said was true. One can also imagine the deep gratitude of Mahomet; out of all the kindnesses she had shown him, her believing in the earnest words he now spoke was the greatest. "It is certain," says Novalis, "my conviction grows infinitely the moment another soul believes in it." It is a boundless gift. He never forgot this good Kadijah. Much later, Ayesha, his young favorite wife, a woman who truly stood out among the Muslims with all her qualities throughout her long life, once asked him: “Am I not better than Kadijah? She was a widow; older, and had lost her looks: you love me more than you did her?”—“No, by Allah!” Mahomet replied: “No, by Allah! She believed in me when no one else would. In the whole world, I had only one friend, and she was 293 that!”—Seid, his slave, also believed in him; these, along with his young cousin Ali, Abu Thaleb’s son, were his first converts.
He spoke of his Doctrine to this man and that; but the most treated it with ridicule, with indifference; in three years, I think, he had gained but thirteen followers. His progress was slow enough. His encouragement to go on, was altogether the usual encouragement that such a man in such a case meets. After some three years of small success, he invited forty of his chief kindred to an entertainment; and there stood-up and told them what his pretension was: that he had this thing to promulgate abroad to all men; that it was the highest thing, the one thing: which of them would second him in that? Amid the doubt and silence of all, young Ali, as yet a lad of sixteen, impatient of the silence, started-up, and exclaimed in passionate fierce language, That he would! The assembly, among whom was Abu Thaleb, Ali’s Father, could not be unfriendly to Mahomet; yet the sight there, of one unlettered elderly man, with a lad of sixteen, deciding on such an enterprise against all mankind, appeared ridiculous to them; the assembly broke-up in laughter. Nevertheless it proved not a laughable thing; it was a very serious thing! As for this young Ali, one cannot but like him. A noble-minded creature, as he shows himself, now and always afterwards; full of affection, of fiery daring. Something chivalrous in him; brave as a lion; yet with a grace, a truth and affection worthy of Christian knighthood. He died by assassination in the Mosque at Bagdad; a death occasioned by his own generous fairness, confidence in the fairness of others: he said, If the wound proved not unto death, they must pardon the Assassin; but if it did, then they must slay him straightway, that so they two in the same hour might appear before God, and see which side of that quarrel was the just one!
He talked about his beliefs to this person and that person, but most people just mocked him or ignored him. In three years, I think he only gained thirteen followers. His progress was pretty slow. His encouragement to keep going was just the typical support someone in his situation usually gets. After about three years of little success, he invited forty of his closest relatives to a gathering and stood up to tell them what he was trying to do: he had this message to share with everyone that was the most important thing, the one thing—who among them would support him in this? Amid the doubt and silence from everyone, young Ali, still just a sixteen-year-old, impatient with the silence, jumped up and exclaimed passionately that he would! The gathering, which included Ali’s father, Abu Thaleb, couldn’t be unfriendly to Muhammad; yet seeing an uneducated older man with a sixteen-year-old deciding to take on such an endeavor against all of humanity seemed ridiculous to them, and they broke into laughter. But it turned out to be no laughing matter; it was very serious! As for young Ali, he’s someone you can't help but like—a noble-minded individual, as he shows himself then and always; full of love and fiery courage. He had a chivalrous spirit, brave as a lion, yet with a grace, truth, and affection worthy of Christian knighthood. He was assassinated in the Mosque in Baghdad; his death came from his own generous fairness and trust in others’ fairness: he said that if the wound didn’t prove fatal, they should forgive the assassin; but if it did, then they should kill him right away so they could both stand before God at the same time and see which side of that conflict was just!
Mahomet naturally gave offence to the Koreish, Keepers of the Caabah, superintendents of the Idols. One or two men of influence had joined him: the thing spread slowly, but it was spreading. Naturally, he gave offence to everybody: Who is this that pretends 294to be wiser than we all; that rebukes us all, as mere fools and worshippers of wood! Abu Thaleb the good Uncle spoke with him: Could he not be silent about all that; believe it all for himself, and not trouble others, anger the chief men, endanger himself and them all, talking of it? Mahomet answered: If the Sun stood on his right hand and the Moon on his left, ordering him to hold his peace, he could not obey! No: there was something in this Truth he had got which was of Nature herself; equal in rank to Sun, or Moon, or whatsoever thing Nature had made. It would speak itself there, so long as the Almighty allowed it, in spite of Sun and Moon, and all Koreish and all men and things. It must do that, and could do no other. Mahomet answered so; and, they say, ‘burst into tears.’ Burst into tears: he felt that Abu Thaleb was good to him; that the task he had got was no soft, but a stern and great one.
Mahomet naturally offended the Koreish, the guardians of the Caabah and overseers of the idols. A few influential men had joined him; the movement was spreading slowly, but it was gaining momentum. Of course, he upset everyone: Who is this guy who thinks he’s smarter than all of us and scolds us as if we’re just fools worshipping wooden idols? Abu Thaleb, his kind uncle, spoke to him: Couldn’t he just keep his beliefs to himself and not trouble others, anger the important leaders, and put everyone at risk by talking about it? Mahomet replied: Even if the Sun stood on his right and the Moon on his left telling him to be quiet, he couldn’t comply! No, there was something about this Truth he had discovered that was fundamental to Nature itself; it was equal in importance to the Sun, the Moon, or anything else that Nature created. It would express itself as long as the Almighty willed it, despite the Sun and Moon, the Koreish, and all men and things. It simply must do that; it couldn’t do anything else. Mahomet responded in this way, and they say he ‘burst into tears.’ He was overwhelmed: he realized that Abu Thaleb cared for him, and that his mission was not easy, but a serious and significant one.
He went on speaking to who would listen to him; publishing his Doctrine among the pilgrims as they came to Mecca; gaining adherents in this place and that. Continual contradiction, hatred, open or secret danger attended him. His powerful relations protected Mahomet himself; but by and by, on his own advice, all his adherents had to quit Mecca, and seek refuge in Abyssinia over the sea. The Koreish grew ever angrier; laid plots, and swore oaths among them, to put Mahomet to death with their own hands. Abu Thaleb was dead, the good Kadijah was dead. Mahomet is not solicitous of sympathy from us; but his outlook at this time was one of the dismalest. He had to hide in caverns, escape in disguise; fly hither and thither; homeless, in continual peril of his life. More than once it seemed all-over with him; more than once it turned on a straw, some rider’s horse taking fright or the like, whether Mahomet and his Doctrine had not ended there, and not been heard of at all. But it was not to end so.
He kept talking to anyone who would listen; spreading his teachings among the pilgrims as they arrived in Mecca; picking up followers here and there. He faced constant opposition, animosity, and danger, both openly and secretly. His influential relatives protected him, but eventually, on his own suggestion, all his supporters had to leave Mecca and find safety in Abyssinia across the sea. The Koreish became increasingly angry, plotting and swearing oaths to kill him themselves. Abu Talib was dead, and the kind Khadijah was gone. Mahomet wasn't looking for our sympathy, but his situation at that time was extremely bleak. He had to hide in caves, sneak around in disguise, and flee from place to place; homeless and continually at risk of losing his life. More than once, it seemed like it was all over for him; it could have changed with just a small event, like a rider’s horse getting startled, leading to the end of Mahomet and his teachings, never to be heard from again. But that was not how it was meant to end.
In the thirteenth year of his mission, finding his enemies all banded against him, forty sworn men, one out of every tribe, waiting to take his life, and no continuance possible at Mecca for him any longer, Mahomet 295fled to the place then called Yathreb, where he had gained some adherents; the place they now call Medina, or ‘Medinat al Nabi, the City of the Prophet,’ from that circumstance. It lay some 200 miles off, through rocks and deserts; not without great difficulty, in such mood as we may fancy, he escaped thither, and found welcome. The whole East dates its era from this Flight, Hegira as they name it: the Year 1 of this Hegira is 622 of our Era, the fifty-third of Mahomet’s life. He was now becoming an old man; his friends sinking round him one by one: his path desolate, encompassed with danger: unless he could find hope in his own heart, the outward face of things was but hopeless for him. It is so with all men in the like case. Hitherto Mahomet had professed to publish his Religion by the way of preaching and persuasion alone. But now, driven foully out of his native country, since unjust men had not only given no ear to his earnest Heaven’s-message, the deep cry of his heart, but would not even let him live if he kept speaking it,—the wild Son of the Desert resolved to defend himself, like a man and Arab. If the Koreish will have it so, they shall have it. Tidings, felt to be of infinite moment to them and all men, they would not listen to these; would trample them down by sheer violence, steel and murder: well, let steel try it then! Ten years more this Mahomet had: all of fighting, of breathless impetuous toil and struggle; with what result we know.
In the thirteenth year of his mission, with all his enemies united against him, forty sworn men—one from every tribe—waiting to kill him, and no way to continue in Mecca, Mahomet 295 fled to a place then called Yathreb, where he had gained some supporters; a place now known as Medina, or ‘Medinat al Nabi, the City of the Prophet,’ because of that. It was about 200 miles away, through rocky terrain and deserts; he made the difficult journey amid what we can imagine were challenging circumstances, where he found a warm welcome. The entire East marks its era from this Escape, referred to as Hegira: the Year 1 of this Hegira is 622 of our Era, the fifty-third year of Mahomet’s life. He was now becoming an old man; his friends were dying one by one around him, making his path lonely and dangerous. Unless he could find hope within himself, the world outside seemed utterly hopeless. This is true for everyone in a similar situation. Until this point, Mahomet had claimed to spread his Religion through preaching and persuasion alone. But now, being unjustly forced out of his homeland, since cruel people not only ignored his sincere message from Heaven and the deep plea of his heart but also wouldn’t allow him to live if he kept speaking it, the wild Son of the Desert decided to defend himself, like a man and an Arab. If the Koreish wanted it that way, then that’s how it would be. They refused to listen to news felt to be of immense importance to them and everyone else and instead chose to suppress it through sheer violence, steel, and murder: well, let them face steel then! Mahomet had ten more years ahead of him, all filled with fighting, breathless determination, and struggle; with what outcome we know.
Much has been said of Mahomet’s propagating his Religion by the sword. It is no doubt far nobler what we have to boast of the Christian Religion, that it propagated itself peaceably in the way of preaching and conviction. Yet withal, if we take this for an argument of the truth or falsehood of a religion, there is a radical mistake in it. The sword indeed: but where will you get your sword! Every new opinion, at its starting, is precisely in a minority of one. In one man’s head alone, there it dwells as yet. One man alone of the whole world believes it; there is one man against all men. That he take a sword, and try to propagate with that, will do little for him. You must first get your sword! On the whole, a thing will propagate itself as 296it can. We do not find, of the Christian Religion either, that it always disdained the sword, when once it had got one. Charlemagne’s conversion of the Saxons was not by preaching. I care little about the sword: I will allow a thing to struggle for itself in this world, with any sword or tongue or implement it has, or can lay hold of. We will let it preach, and pamphleteer, and fight, and to the uttermost bestir itself, and do, beak and claws, whatsoever is in it; very sure that it will, in the long-run, conquer nothing which does not deserve to be conquered. What is better than itself, it cannot put away, but only what is worse. In this great Duel, Nature herself is umpire, and can do no wrong: the thing which is deepest-rooted in Nature, what we call truest, that thing and not the other will be found growing at last.
A lot has been said about how Muhammad spread his religion by the sword. It's certainly more admirable that Christianity spread peacefully through preaching and convincing others. However, if we use this as a measure of a religion’s truth or falseness, there’s a fundamental misunderstanding. The sword is indeed a factor, but where do you get your sword? Every new idea starts as a minority of one. It exists in just one person's mind at first. Only one individual in the entire world believes it; it's one person against everyone else. If that person takes a sword to try to spread their belief, it won’t get them very far. You first need to acquire your sword! Ultimately, a belief will spread as effectively as it can. We also see that Christianity didn’t always reject the sword once it had one. Charlemagne didn’t convert the Saxons through preaching. I don’t care much for the sword; I’ll let an idea fight for itself using any resources, weapons, or words it can find. It can preach, write pamphlets, and battle, doing everything it has in it; I’m confident that, in the end, it will conquer nothing that doesn’t deserve to be conquered. What is better than itself cannot be dismissed, only what is worse. In this great Duel, Nature herself is the judge and can't be wrong: what is most deeply rooted in Nature, what we call truest, will ultimately prevail.
Here however, in reference to much that there is in Mahomet and his success, we are to remember what an umpire Nature is; what a greatness, composure of depth and tolerance there is in her. You take wheat to cast into the Earth’s bosom: your wheat may be mixed with chaff, chopped straw, barn-sweepings, dust and all imaginable rubbish; no matter: you cast it into the kind just Earth; she grows the wheat,—the whole rubbish she silently absorbs, shrouds it in, says nothing of the rubbish. The yellow wheat is growing there; the good Earth is silent about all the rest,—has silently turned all the rest to some benefit too, and makes no complaint about it! So everywhere in Nature! She is true and not a lie; and yet so great, and just, and motherly in her truth. She requires of a thing only that it be genuine of heart; she will protect it if so; will not, if not so. There is a soul of truth in all the things she ever gave harbour to. Alas, is not this the history of all highest Truth that comes or ever came into the world? The body of them all is imperfection, an element of light in darkness: to us they have to come embodied in mere Logic, in some merely scientific Theorem of the Universe; which cannot be complete; which cannot but be found, one day, incomplete, erroneous, and so die and disappear. The body of all Truth dies; and yet in all, I say, there is 297a soul which never dies; which in new and ever-nobler embodiment lives immortal as man himself! It is the way with Nature. The genuine essence of Truth never dies. That it be genuine, a voice from the great Deep of Nature, there is the point at Nature’s judgment-seat. What we call pure or impure, is not with her the final question. Not how much chaff is in you; but whether you have any wheat. Pure? I might say to many a man: Yes, you are pure; pure enough; but you are chaff,—insincere hypothesis, hearsay, formality; you never were in contact with the great heart of the Universe at all; you are properly neither pure nor impure; you are nothing, Nature has no business with you.
Here, when we think about much of what is found in Muhammad and his achievements, we should keep in mind what a referee Nature is; how great, composed, deep, and tolerant she is. You take wheat to plant in the Earth’s embrace: your wheat might be mixed with chaff, cut straw, barn debris, dirt, and all sorts of junk; it doesn't matter: you throw it into the welcoming Earth; she nurtures the wheat—silently absorbs all the junk, wraps it in, and says nothing about the rubbish. The golden wheat grows there; the good Earth stays quiet about everything else—she has silently turned all that junk into something useful too, and complains not at all! This is true everywhere in Nature! She is honest and not deceptive; yet she is so great, just, and nurturing in her honesty. She only demands that something be genuine at heart; she will protect it if it is; she won’t if it is not. There is a soul of truth in everything she ever embraced. Alas, isn't this the story of every highest Truth that has ever entered the world? The physical form of them all is flawed, a spark of light in darkness: to us, they must come expressed in mere Logic, in some simple scientific theory of the Universe; which cannot be complete; which will inevitably be found, one day, to be incomplete, flawed, and thus perish and fade away. The physical manifestations of all Truths perish; yet in all, I say, there is a soul that never dies; which, in new and ever-greater forms, lives on immortally as mankind itself! That is how Nature works. The true essence of Truth never dies. The key requirement is that it be genuine, a voice from the great Depth of Nature; that is the standard at Nature’s judgment seat. What we label as pure or impure isn’t the final question for her. It’s not about how much chaff is in you; but whether you have any wheat. Pure? I could say to many a man: Yes, you are pure; pure enough; but you are chaff—insincere ideas, hearsay, superficiality; you have never truly connected with the great heart of the Universe at all; you are in fact neither pure nor impure; you are nothing, Nature has no interest in you.
Mahomet’s Creed we called a kind of Christianity; and really, if we look at the wild rapt earnestness with which it was believed and laid to heart, I should say a better kind than that of those miserable Syrian Sects, with their vain janglings about Homoiousion and Homoousion, the head full of worthless noise, the heart empty and dead! The truth of it is embedded in portentous error and falsehood; but the truth of it makes it be believed, not the falsehood: it succeeded by its truth. A bastard kind of Christianity, but a living kind; with a heart-life in it: not dead, chopping barren logic merely! Out of all that rubbish of Arab idolatries, argumentative theologies, traditions, subtleties, rumours and hypotheses of Greeks and Jews, with their idle wire-drawings, this wild man of the Desert, with his wild sincere heart, earnest as death and life, with his great flashing natural eyesight, had seen into the kernel of the matter. Idolatry is nothing: these Wooden Idols of yours, ‘ye rub them with oil and wax, and the flies stick on them,’—these are wood, I tell you! They can do nothing for you; they are an impotent blasphemous pretence; a horror and abomination, if ye knew them. God alone is; God alone has power; He made us, He can kill us and keep us alive: ‘Allah akbar, God is great.’ Understand that His will is the best for you; that howsoever sore to flesh-and-blood, you will find it the wisest, best: you are bound to take it so; in this world and in the next, you have no other thing that you can do!
We called Mahomet’s Creed a kind of Christianity; and honestly, if we look at the intense passion with which it was believed and embraced, I’d say it’s a better kind than that of those miserable Syrian sects, with their pointless arguments about Homoiousion and Homoousion, where their heads are full of worthless chatter, and their hearts are empty and lifeless! The truth of it is wrapped up in significant error and falsehood; but it’s the truth that allows people to believe it, not the falsehood: it succeeded because of its truth. It’s a twisted kind of Christianity but a vibrant one; it has a heart and life in it, not just lifeless, barren logic! Amid all the clutter of Arab idolatries, argumentative theologies, traditions, subtleties, rumors, and hypotheses from Greeks and Jews, with their useless complexities, this wild man from the Desert, with his sincere heart, earnest as life and death, with his clear natural insight, saw the essence of the matter. Idolatry is meaningless: those wooden idols of yours, ‘you rub them with oil and wax, and the flies stick to them’—they are just wood, I tell you! They can’t do anything for you; they are an impotent, blasphemous pretense; a horror and abomination, if you knew better. God is the only one who is; God alone has power; He made us, He can kill us and keep us alive: ‘Allah akbar, God is great.’ Understand that His will is what’s best for you; no matter how painful it might be for you, you will find it’s the wisest, the best: you have to accept it; in this world and the next, you have no other choice!
298And now if the wild idolatrous men did believe this, and with their fiery hearts laid hold of it to do it, in what form soever it came to them, I say it was well worthy of being believed. In one form or the other, I say it is still the one thing worthy of being believed by all men. Man does hereby become the high-priest of this Temple of a World. He is in harmony with the Decrees of the Author of this World; coöperating with them, not vainly withstanding them: I know, to this day, no better definition of Duty than that same. All that is right includes itself in this of coöperating with the real Tendency of the World; you succeed by this (the World’s Tendency will succeed), you are good, and in the right course there. Homoiousion, Homoousion, vain logical jangle, then or before or at any time, may jangle itself out, and go whither and how it likes: this is the thing it all struggles to mean, if it would mean anything. If it do not succeed in meaning this, it means nothing. Not that Abstractions, logical Propositions, be correctly worded or incorrectly; but that living concrete Sons of Adam do lay this to heart: that is the important point. Islam devoured all these vain jangling Sects; and I think had right to do so. It was a Reality, direct from the great Heart of Nature once more. Arab idolatries, Syrian formulas, whatsoever was not equally real, had to go up in flame,—mere dead fuel, in various senses, for this which was fire.
298And now, if the wild, idolatrous people believed this and passionately embraced it in whatever form it came to them, I’d say it was truly worth believing. In one way or another, I still maintain that this is the one thing all people should believe in. A person then becomes the high priest of this Temple of the World. They align with the Decrees of the Creator of this World, cooperating with them rather than resisting them. To this day, I know no better definition of Duty than that. Everything that is right involves cooperating with the true Tendency of the World; you succeed through this (the World’s Tendency will prevail), you are virtuous, and you are on the right path. Homoiousion, Homoousion, irrelevant logical disputes, whether in the past or at any time, may sort themselves out and go wherever they please: this is the thing it all struggles to convey, if it has any meaning at all. If it fails to convey this, it signifies nothing. It’s not about whether abstractions or logical propositions are phrased correctly or incorrectly; what matters is that living, breathing Sons of Adam take this to heart: that is the crucial point. Islam consumed all these meaningless, quarreling sects, and I believe it had every right to do so. It was a Reality, directly from the great Heart of Nature once again. Arab idolatries, Syrian formulas, anything that wasn’t equally real had to be burned away—mere dead fuel, in various senses, for this which was fire.
It was during these wild warfarings and strugglings, especially after the Flight to Mecca, that Mahomet dictated at intervals his Sacred Book, which they name Koran, or Reading, ‘Thing to be read.’ This is the Work he and his disciples made so much of, asking all the world, Is not that a miracle? The Mahometans regard their Koran with a reverence which few Christians pay even to their Bible. It is admitted everywhere as the standard of all law and all practice; the thing to be gone-upon in speculation and life: the message sent direct out of Heaven, which this Earth has to conform to, and walk by; the thing to be read. Their Judges decide by it; all Moslem are bound to study it, seek in it for the light of their life. They have 299mosques where it is all read daily; thirty relays of priests take it up in succession, get through the whole each day. There, for twelve-hundred years, has the voice of this Book, at all moments, kept sounding through the ears and the hearts of so many men. We hear of Mahometan Doctors that had read it seventy-thousand times!
It was during these intense struggles and battles, especially after the Flight to Mecca, that Muhammad dictated his Sacred Book, which is called the Koran, or Reading, meaning ‘Thing to be read.’ This is the work he and his followers emphasized greatly, asking everyone around them, "Isn’t that a miracle?" Muslims view their Koran with a reverence that few Christians show even toward their Bible. It is recognized everywhere as the foundation of all law and practice; the guide for both thought and life: the message sent directly from Heaven, which this Earth must follow and live by; the thing to be read. Their judges make decisions based on it; all Muslims are required to study it and find in it the guidance for their lives. They have 299 mosques where it is read every day; thirty groups of clerics take turns reading it in succession, completing the entire text each day. For twelve hundred years, the voice of this Book has continuously resonated in the ears and hearts of countless people. There are reports of Muslim scholars who have read it seventy thousand times!
Very curious: if one sought for ‘discrepancies of national taste,’ here surely were the most eminent instance of that! We also can read the Koran; our Translation of it, by Sale, is known to be a very fair one. I must say, it is as toilsome reading as I ever undertook. A wearisome confused jumble, crude, incondite; endless iterations, long-windedness, entanglement; most crude, incondite;—insupportable stupidity, in short! Nothing but a sense of duty could carry any European through the Koran. We read in it, as we might in the State-Paper Office, unreadable masses of lumber, that perhaps we may get some glimpses of a remarkable man. It is true we have it under disadvantages: the Arabs see more method in it than we. Mahomet’s followers found the Koran lying all in fractions, as it had been written-down at first promulgation; much of it, they say, on shoulder-blades of mutton, flung pellmell into a chest: and they published it, without any discoverable order as to time or otherwise;—merely trying, as would seem, and this not very strictly, to put the longest chapters first. The real beginning of it, in that way, lies almost at the end: for the earliest portions were the shortest. Read in its historical sequence it perhaps would not be so bad. Much of it, too, they say, is rhythmic; a kind of wild chanting song, in the original. This may be a great point; much perhaps has been lost in the Translation here. Yet with every allowance, one feels it difficult to see how any mortal ever could consider this Koran as a Book written in Heaven, too good for the Earth; as a well-written book, or indeed as a book at all; and not a bewildered rhapsody; written, so far as writing goes, as badly as almost any book ever was. So much for national discrepancies, and the standard of taste.
Very curious: if someone looked for 'differences in national taste,' this would surely be the most notable example! We can also read the Koran; our translation of it by Sale is known to be quite decent. I must say, it’s the most laborious reading I’ve ever taken on. It’s a tedious, confusing mix, crude and poorly organized; filled with endless repetitions, excessive wordiness, and entanglements; just downright foolishness, really! Only a sense of duty could get any European through the Koran. We read it as we might read unreadable piles of documents in the State-Paper Office, hoping to catch glimpses of a remarkable man. It’s true we have some disadvantages: the Arabs find more structure in it than we do. Mahomet’s followers discovered the Koran in fragments, as it had originally been recorded at its announcement; much of it, they say, was written on sheep shoulder blades and tossed haphazardly into a chest: and they published it without any clear order in terms of time or otherwise; merely trying, it seems, and not very strictly, to put the longest chapters first. The actual beginning, in that sense, is almost at the end: the earliest sections were the shortest. If read in its historical order, it might not be so bad. They also say that much of it is rhythmic; a kind of wild chant in the original. This might be a significant point; a lot may have been lost in the translation here. Yet, despite all allowances, it’s hard to see how anyone ever could consider this Koran as a book written in Heaven, too good for Earth; as a well-written book, or really as a book at all; and not just a bewildering rhapsody; written, as far as writing goes, as poorly as almost any book ever was. So much for national discrepancies and standards of taste.
Yet I should say, it was not unintelligible how the 300Arabs might so love it. When once you get this confused coil of a Koran fairly off your hands, and have it behind you at a distance, the essential type of it begins to disclose itself; and in this there is a merit quite other than the literary one. If a book come from the heart, it will contrive to reach other hearts; all art and authorcraft are of small amount to that. One would say the primary character of the Koran is that of its genuineness, of its being a bonâ-fide book. Prideaux, I know, and others have represented it as a mere bundle of juggleries; chapter after chapter got-up to excuse and varnish the author’s successive sins, forward his ambitions and quackeries: but really it is time to dismiss all that. I do not assert Mahomet’s continual sincerity: who is continually sincere? But I confess I can make nothing of the critic, in these times, who would accuse him of deceit prepense; of conscious deceit generally, or perhaps at all;—still more, of living in a mere element of conscious deceit, and writing this Koran as a forger and juggler would have done! Every candid eye, I think, will read the Koran far otherwise than so. It is the confused ferment of a great rude human soul; rude, untutored, that cannot even read; but fervent, earnest, struggling vehemently to utter itself in words. With a kind of breathless intensity he strives to utter himself; the thoughts crowd on him pellmell: for very multitude of things to say, he can get nothing said. The meaning that is in him shapes itself into no form of composition, is stated in no sequence, method, or coherence;—they are not shaped at all, these thoughts of his; flung-out unshaped, as they struggle and tumble there, in their chaotic inarticulate state. We said ‘stupid:’ yet natural stupidity is by no means the character of Mahomet’s Book; it is natural uncultivation rather. The man has not studied speaking; in the haste and pressure of continual fighting, has not time to mature himself into fit speech. The panting breathless haste and vehemence of a man struggling in the thick of battle for life and salvation; this is the mood he is in! A headlong haste; for very magnitude of meaning, he cannot get himself articulated into words. The successive utterances of a soul in 301that mood, coloured by the various vicissitudes of three-and-twenty years; now well uttered, now worse: this is the Koran.
Yet I must say, it’s not hard to see why the Arabs would love it. Once you manage to set aside this confusing mess of a Koran and look at it from a distance, its true nature starts to reveal itself; and there’s a value here that goes beyond just literary merit. If a book comes from the heart, it will find its way to other hearts; all the art and crafting by the author matter little in comparison. One could argue that the main feature of the Koran is its genuineness, the fact that it’s a bonâ-fide book. I know Prideaux and others have portrayed it as nothing more than a collection of tricks; chapters created to justify the author's ongoing sins, promote his ambitions, and disguise his deceptions: but honestly, it’s time to move past that. I’m not claiming that Muhammad was constantly sincere; who is always sincere? But I have to admit I can’t understand critics today who accuse him of deliberate deception; of being generally, or even ever, deceitful;—even more so when they imply he lived in a constant state of conscious deceit and wrote this Koran like a fraud would! I believe that any fair-minded person will interpret the Koran very differently. It is the chaotic outpouring of a great, raw human spirit; rough, unrefined, that couldn’t even read; but passionate, earnest, desperately trying to express itself in words. With a kind of breathless urgency, he strives to express himself; thoughts flood in on him, and because there are so many things to say, he can’t get any of it out. The meaning within him doesn’t take any structured form; it’s not articulated in any order, method, or coherence;—these thoughts of his are not shaped at all, thrown out unshaped as they struggle and tumble around in their chaotic, inarticulate state. We called it ‘stupid:’ yet natural stupidity is not really what characterizes Muhammad’s Book; it’s more about natural unrefinement. The man hasn’t trained in speaking; in the rush and stress of ongoing battles, he’s got no time to develop into proper speech. The breathless urgency and intensity of a man fighting hard for life and salvation; this is the mindset he’s in! A reckless haste; overwhelmed by the meaning he carries, he can’t articulate it in words. The successive expressions of a soul in 301 that mindset, shaped by the various ups and downs of twenty-three years; sometimes well-expressed, sometimes less so: this is the Koran.
For we are to consider Mahomet, through these three-and-twenty years, as the centre of a world wholly in conflict. Battles with the Koreish and Heathen, quarrels among his own people, backslidings of his own wild heart; all this kept him in a perpetual whirl, his soul knowing rest no more. In wakeful nights, as one may fancy, the wild soul of the man, tossing amid these vortices, would hail any light of a decision for them as a veritable light from Heaven; any making-up of his mind, so blessed, indispensable for him there, would seem the inspiration of a Gabriel. Forger and juggler? No, no! This great fiery heart, seething, simmering like a great furnace of thoughts, was not a juggler’s. His life was a Fact to him; this God’s Universe an awful Fact and Reality. He has faults enough. The man was an uncultured semi-barbarous Son of Nature, much of the Bedouin still clinging to him: we must take him for that. But for a wretched Simulacrum, a hungry Impostor without eyes or heart, practising for a mess of pottage such blasphemous swindlery, forgery of celestial documents, continual high-treason against his Maker and Self, we will not and cannot take him.
For over twenty years, we need to see Muhammad as the center of a world that was completely at war. He fought battles against the Koreish and pagans, had arguments with his own people, and struggled with his own restless spirit; all of this kept him in a constant state of turmoil, his soul finding no peace. During sleepless nights, one might imagine that this wild man, tossing amid these conflicts, would see any moment of clarity as a genuine sign from Heaven; any decision he could come to, so precious and necessary for him there, would feel like divine inspiration from Gabriel. A trickster and deceiver? No, no! This intense, passionate heart, boiling over with thoughts, was not that of a charlatan. His life was a reality to him; this God's Universe was a frightening truth and reality. He had many flaws. The man was an unrefined, semi-barbaric Son of Nature, still holding onto much of his Bedouin heritage: we must accept that. But as a miserable imitation, a greedy fraud without vision or compassion, engaging in deceit for a bowl of stew, committing blasphemy and fraud, and constantly betraying both his Maker and himself, we refuse to see him that way.
Sincerity, in all senses, seems to me the merit of the Koran; what had rendered it precious to the wild Arab men. It is, after all, the first and last merit in a book; gives rise to merits of all kinds,—nay, at bottom, it alone can give rise to merit of any kind. Curiously, through these incondite masses of tradition, vituperation, complaint, ejaculation in the Koran, a vein of true direct insight, of what we might almost call poetry, is found straggling. The body of the Book is made-up of mere tradition, and as it were vehement enthusiastic extempore preaching. He returns forever to the old stories of the Prophets as they went current in the Arab memory: how Prophet after Prophet, the Prophet Abraham, the Prophet Hud, the Prophet Moses, Christian and other real and fabulous Prophets, had come to this Tribe and to that, warning men of 302their sin; and been received by them even as he Mahomet was,—which is a great solace to him. These things he repeats ten, perhaps twenty times; again and ever again with wearisome iteration; has never done repeating them. A brave Samuel Johnson, in his forlorn garret, might con-over the Biographies of Authors in that way! This is the great staple of the Koran. But curiously, through all this, comes ever and anon some glance as of the real thinker and seer. He has actually an eye for the world, this Mahomet: with a certain directness and rugged vigour, he brings home still, to our heart, the thing his own heart has been opened to. I make but little of his praises of Allah, which many praise; they are borrowed I suppose mainly from the Hebrew, at least they are far surpassed there. But the eye that flashes direct into the heart of things, and sees the truth of them; this is to me a highly interesting object. Great Nature’s own gift; which she bestows on all; but which only one in the thousand does not cast sorrowfully away: it is what I call sincerity of vision; the test of a sincere heart.
Sincerity, in every sense, strikes me as the valuable quality of the Koran; what made it precious to the wild Arab tribes. After all, it’s the most important quality in any book; it leads to all kinds of merits—indeed, at its core, it’s the only thing that can truly give rise to any merit. Interestingly, amid the chaotic collections of tradition, criticism, complaints, and exclamations in the Koran, there’s a thread of genuine insight, what we might even call poetry, that emerges sporadically. The main content of the Book consists of pure tradition, almost like passionate, spontaneous preaching. It constantly circles back to the stories of the Prophets as they were known in Arab culture: how Prophet after Prophet—Abraham, Hud, Moses, and various other real and legendary Prophets—came to this tribe or that, warning people of their sins; and how they were received just like Muhammad was—which brings him great comfort. He repeats these tales perhaps ten, even twenty times; again and again with exhausting repetition; he seems never to stop echoing them. A brave Samuel Johnson, in his lonely attic, might review the Biographies of Authors in a similar fashion! This is the main theme of the Koran. Yet, intriguingly, within all this, there are moments where a real thinker and seer emerges. Muhammad truly has a perspective on the world; with a certain straightforwardness and raw strength, he relates what his own heart has felt to ours. I think very little of his praises of Allah, which many admire; they are likely mostly borrowed from Hebrew sources, which express them far better. But the gaze that pierces straight into the essence of things, and sees their truth; that to me is a captivating quality. It’s Nature’s own gift; one that she offers to everyone; yet only one in a thousand does not sadly ignore it: this is what I call sincerity of vision; the hallmark of a sincere heart.
Mahomet can work no miracles; he often answers impatiently: I can work no miracles. I? ‘I am a Public Preacher;’ appointed to preach this doctrine to all creatures. Yet the world, as we can see, had really from of old been all one great miracle to him. Look over the world, says he; is it not wonderful, the work of Allah; wholly ‘a sign to you,’ if your eyes were open! This Earth, God made it for you: ‘appointed paths in it;’ you can live in it, go to and fro on it.—The clouds in the dry country of Arabia, to Mahomet they are very wonderful: Great clouds, he says, born in the deep bosom of the Upper Immensity, where do they come from! They hang there, the great black monsters; pour-down their rain deluges ‘to revive a dead earth,’ and grass springs, and tall leafy palm-trees with their date-clusters hanging round. Is not that a sign?’ Your cattle too,—Allah made them; serviceable dumb creatures; they change the grass into milk; you have your clothing from them, very strange creatures; they come ranking home at evening-time, ‘and,’ adds he, ‘and are a credit to you!’ Ships also,—he 303talks often about ships: Huge moving mountains, they spread-out their cloth wings, go bounding through the water there, Heaven’s wind driving them; anon they lie motionless, God has withdrawn the wind, they lie dead, and cannot stir! Miracles? cries he; what miracle would you have? Are not you yourselves there? God made you, ‘shaped you out of a little clay.’ Ye were small once; a few years ago ye were not at all. Ye have beauty, strength, thoughts, ‘ye have compassion on one another.’ Old age comes-on you, and gray hairs; your strength fades into feebleness; ye sink down, and again are not. ‘Ye have compassion on one another:’ this struck me much: Allah might have made you having no compassion on one another,—how had it been then! This is a great direct thought, a glance at first-hand into the very fact of things. Rude vestiges of poetic genius, of whatsoever is best and truest, are visible in this man. A strong untutored intellect: eyesight, heart; a strong wild man,—might have shaped himself into Poet, King, Priest, any kind of Hero.
Muhammad can't perform miracles; he often responds impatiently: "I can't work any miracles. I? I'm a Public Preacher, appointed to spread this message to all beings." Yet the world, as we can see, has always been one huge miracle to him. "Look at the world," he says; "isn't it amazing, the work of Allah? It's all 'a sign to you,' if you'd just open your eyes!" This Earth was made for you: "it has 'appointed paths in it;' you can live here, travel back and forth on it." The clouds in the dry land of Arabia seem very remarkable to Muhammad: "Those great clouds," he says, "formed in the vastness of the Upper Immensity—where do they come from? They hang there, those big black giants; they pour down their rain to 'revive a dead earth,' and grass grows, and tall leafy palm trees with their clusters of dates hanging around. Isn't that a sign?" Your livestock too—Allah created them; useful, silent creatures; they turn grass into milk; you get your clothes from them, such peculiar beings; they return home at night, "and," he adds, "they are a credit to you!" He often talks about ships: "Huge moving mountains, they spread out their cloth wings and glide through the water, driven by Heaven's wind; then suddenly they lie still, God has taken away the wind, they remain motionless, unable to move!" "Miracles?" he exclaims; "what kind of miracle do you want? Aren't you yourselves right there? God made *you*, 'shaped you out of a little clay.' You were once small; just a few years ago you didn't exist at all. You have beauty, strength, thoughts; 'you have compassion for one another.' Aging comes upon you with gray hairs; your strength fades into weakness; you decline and eventually cease to be. 'You have compassion for one another:' this struck me deeply: Allah could have created you without compassion for each other—what would that have been like then? This is a profound thought, a glimpse into the very essence of reality. Traces of poetic genius and everything that's best and truest can be seen in this man. He has a strong, untutored intellect: vision, heart; a fierce natural man—could have molded himself into a Poet, King, Priest, or any kind of Hero.
To his eyes it is forever clear that this world wholly is miraculous. He sees what, as we said once before, all great thinkers, the rude Scandinavians themselves, in one way or other, have contrived to see: That this so solid-looking material world is, at bottom, in very deed, Nothing; is a visual and tactual Manifestation of God’s power and presence,—a shadow hung-out by Him on the bosom of the void Infinite; nothing more. The Mountains, he says, these great rock-mountains, they shall dissipate themselves ‘like clouds;’ melt into the Blue as clouds do, and not be! He figures the Earth, in the Arab fashion, Sale tells us, as an immense Plain or flat Plate of ground, the mountains are set on that to steady it. At the Last Day they shall disappear ‘like clouds;’ the whole Earth shall go spinning, whirl itself off into wreck, and as dust and vapour vanish in the Inane. Allah withdraws his hand from it, and it ceases to be. The universal empire of Allah, presence everywhere of an unspeakable Power, a Splendour, and a Terror not to be named, as the true force, essence and reality, in all things whatsoever, 304was continually clear to this man. What a modern talks-of by the name, Forces of Nature, Laws of Nature; and does not figure as a divine thing; not even as one thing at all, but as a set of things, undivine enough,—saleable, curious, good for propelling steamships! With our Sciences and Cyclopædias, we are apt to forget the divineness, in these laboratories of ours. We ought not to forget it! That once well forgotten, I know not what else were worth remembering. Most sciences, I think, were then a very dead thing; withered, contentious, empty;—a thistle in late autumn. The best science, without this, is but as the dead timber; it is not the growing tree and forest,—which gives ever-new timber, among other things! Man cannot know either, unless he can worship in some way. His knowledge is a pedantry, and dead thistle, otherwise.
To him, it’s always clear that this world is completely miraculous. He sees what, as mentioned before, all great thinkers, even the rough Scandinavians, in one way or another, have managed to see: That this seemingly solid material world is, at its core, actually Nothing; it’s a visual and tactile expression of God’s power and presence—a shadow cast by Him on the vast void of Infinity; nothing more. The mountains, he says, these massive rock formations, will dissolve ‘like clouds;’ they will melt into the sky just like clouds do, and cease to exist! He imagines the Earth, in the Arab tradition, as a gigantic flat plate, with the mountains placed on it to steady it. On the Last Day, they will vanish ‘like clouds;’ the whole Earth will spin away, disintegrating into dust and vapor, disappearing into the void. Allah pulls His hand away, and it stops existing. The all-encompassing realm of Allah, the presence everywhere of an indescribable Power, a Glory, and a Fear beyond words, as the true force, essence, and reality in all things, 304 was constantly evident to this man. What modern people refer to as the Forces of Nature, Laws of Nature; not seen as divine at all; not even as a singular entity, but rather as a collection of things, undivine enough—marketable, interesting, good for driving steamships! With our Sciences and Encyclopedias, we tend to forget the divinity in these laboratories of ours. We shouldn’t forget it! Once that’s well forgotten, I don’t know what else is worth remembering. Most sciences, I believe, become very lifeless; shriveled, argumentative, empty;—like a thistle in late autumn. The best science, without this perspective, is just dead timber; it’s not the living tree and forest—which keeps providing fresh timber, among other things! A person cannot know either, unless they can worship in some form. Otherwise, their knowledge is mere pedantry and a lifeless thistle.
Much has been said and written about the sensuality of Mahomet’s Religion; more than was just. The indulgences, criminal to us, which he permitted, were not of his appointment; he found them practised, unquestioned from immemorial time in Arabia; what he did was to curtail them, restrict them, not on one but on many sides. His Religion is not an easy one: with rigorous fasts, lavations, strict complex formulas, prayers five times a day, and abstinence from wine, it did not ‘succeed by being an easy religion.’ As if indeed any religion, or cause holding of religion, could succeed by that! It is a calumny on men to say that they are roused to heroic action by ease, hope of pleasure, recompense,—sugar-plums of any kind, in this world or the next! In the meanest mortal there lies something nobler. The poor swearing soldier, hired to be shot, has his ‘honour of a soldier,’ different from drill-regulations and the shilling a day. It is not to taste sweet things, but to do noble and true things, and vindicate himself under God’s Heaven as a god-made Man, that the poorest son of Adam dimly longs. Show him the way of doing that, the dullest daydrudge kindles into a hero. They wrong man greatly who say he is to be seduced by ease. Difficulty, abnegation, martyrdom, death are the allurements that act on the heart of 305man. Kindle the inner genial life of him, you have a flame that burns-up all lower considerations. Not happiness, but something higher: one sees this even in the frivolous classes, with their ‘point of honour’ and the like. Not by flattering our appetites; no, by awakening the Heroic that slumbers in every heart, can any Religion gain followers.
Much has been discussed and written about the sensuality of Mahomet's religion; more than what is fair. The indulgences, which seem wrong to us, that he allowed were not of his own doing; he found them practiced and accepted for ages in Arabia. What he did was limit and restrict them, not just in one aspect but in many. His religion is not an easy one: with strict fasts, rituals, complex rules, prayers five times a day, and a ban on wine, it did not "succeed by being an easy religion." As if any religion, or any cause that derives from religion, could succeed in that way! It is a mistake to think that people are inspired to heroic actions by comfort, the promise of pleasure, or rewards—any kind of "sugar-coating," whether in this life or the next! Even in the most ordinary person, there exists something greater. The poor soldier, who is paid to be shot at, has his "honor as a soldier," something beyond his training and daily wage. It is not to indulge in sweet pleasures, but to achieve noble and true actions, to validate himself under God's Heaven as a god-made human, that the humblest individual yearns for in his heart. Show him how to achieve that, and even the dullest laborer can become a hero. They greatly underestimate humanity by suggesting that ease can lead to motivation. Challenge, sacrifice, martyrdom, and even death are the true drivers that resonate with the human spirit. If you ignite the inner warmth within him, you create a fire that consumes all lesser thoughts. Not happiness, but something of greater significance: this can be observed even in the more superficial classes, with their "sense of honor" and similar concepts. No, it's not about catering to our desires; it's about awakening the heroic spirit that lies dormant in every heart that will draw people to any religion.
Mahomet himself, after all that can be said about him, was not a sensual man. We shall err widely if we consider this man as a common voluptuary, intent mainly on base enjoyments,—nay on enjoyments of any kind. His household was of the frugalest; his common diet barley-bread and water: sometimes for months there was not a fire once lighted on his hearth. They record with just pride that he would mend his own shoes, patch his own cloak. A poor, hard-toiling, ill-provided man; careless of what vulgar men toil for. Not a bad man, I should say; something better in him than hunger of any sort,—or these wild Arab men, fighting and jostling three-and-twenty years at his hand, in close contact with him always, would not have reverenced him so! They were wild men, bursting ever and anon into quarrel, into all kinds of fierce sincerity; without right worth and manhood, no man could have commanded them. They called him Prophet, you say? Why, he stood there face to face with them; bare, not enshrined in any mystery; visibly clouting his own cloak, cobbling his own shoes; fighting, counselling, ordering in the midst of them: they must have seen what kind of a man he was, let him be called what you like! No emperor with his tiaras was obeyed as this man in a cloak of his own clouting. During three-and-twenty years of rough actual trial. I find something of a veritable Hero necessary for that, of itself.
Mohammed himself, despite everything that's been said about him, was not a sensual man. We would be mistaken to view him as just a typical pleasure-seeker, primarily focused on base pleasures—rather than any kind of pleasure at all. His household was very frugal; his usual diet consisted of barley bread and water. There were times when, for months, he didn’t light a fire in his home. They proudly note that he mended his own shoes and patched his own cloak. He was a poor, hard-working man who didn’t care about what ordinary people strive for. I wouldn’t call him a bad man; there was something better in him than any kind of hunger—or else these wild Arab men, who fought and struggled alongside him for twenty-three years, wouldn’t have revered him so much! They were wild individuals, often breaking into quarrels and expressing fierce honesty; without true worth and integrity, no one could have commanded them. They referred to him as a Prophet, you say? Well, he stood there face to face with them; unadorned, not shrouded in any mystery; visibly mending his own cloak and cobbling his own shoes. He fought, advised, and led right among them: they must have recognized what kind of man he was, regardless of what he was called! No emperor in his crowns was obeyed as this man was, in a cloak that he had patched himself. Over twenty-three years of real, tough trials, I find that it takes a true Hero for that alone.
His last words are a prayer; broken ejaculations of a heart struggling-up, in trembling hope, towards its Maker. We cannot say that his religion made him worse; it made him better; good, not bad. Generous things are recorded of him: when he lost his Daughter, the thing he answers is, in his own dialect, everyway sincere, and yet equivalent to that of Christians, ‘The 306Lord giveth, and the Lord taketh away; blessed be the name of the Lord.’ He answered in like manner of Seid, his emancipated well-beloved Slave, the second of the believers. Seid had fallen in the War of Tabûc, the first of Mahomet’s fightings with the Greeks. Mahomet said, It was well; Seid had done his Master’s work, Seid had now gone to his Master: it was all well with Seid. Yet Seid’s daughter found him weeping over the body;—the old gray-haired man melting in tears! “What do I see?” said she.—“You see a friend weeping over his friend.”—He went out for the last time into the mosque, two days before his death; asked, If he had injured any man? Let his own back bear the stripes. If he owed any man? A voice answered, “Yes, me three drachms,” borrowed on such an occasion. Mahomet ordered them to be paid: “Better be in shame now,” said he, “than at the Day of Judgment.”—You remember Kadijah, and the “No, by Allah!” Traits of that kind show us the genuine man, the brother of us all, brought visible through twelve centuries,—the veritable Son of our common Mother.
His last words are a prayer; broken exclamations from a heart reaching out, in trembling hope, to its Creator. We cannot say that his faith made him worse; it made him better; good, not bad. Kind acts are recorded of him: when he lost his daughter, what he said, in his own way, was sincere and similar to what Christians might express: ‘The 306Lord gives, and the Lord takes away; blessed be the name of the Lord.’ He responded similarly about Seid, his beloved freed slave, who was the second of the believers. Seid had died in the Battle of Tabûc, Mahomet’s first conflict with the Greeks. Mahomet said it was okay; Seid had done his Master’s work, and now he was with his Master: all was well with Seid. Yet Seid's daughter found him crying over the body—an old gray-haired man in tears! “What do I see?” she asked. “You see a friend mourning for his friend.” He went out for the last time into the mosque, two days before he died; he asked if he had wronged anyone. Let his own back take the blame. If he owed anyone? A voice answered, “Yes, me three drachms,” borrowed for a specific occasion. Mahomet ordered them to be paid: “Better to face shame now,” he said, “than at the Day of Judgment.” You remember Kadijah and her “No, by Allah!” Such traits reveal the true man, our common brother, made visible through twelve centuries—the real Son of our shared Mother.
Withal I like Mahomet for his total freedom from cant. He is a rough self-helping son of the wilderness; does not pretend to be what he is not. There is no ostentatious pride in him; but neither does he go much upon humility: he is there as he can be, in cloak and shoes of his own clouting; speaks plainly to all manner of Persian Kings, Greek Emperors, what it is they are bound to do; knows well enough, about himself, ‘the respect due unto thee.’ In a life-and-death war with Bedouins, cruel things could not fail; but neither are acts of mercy, of noble natural pity and generosity wanting. Mahomet makes no apology for the one, no boast of the other. They were each the free dictate of his heart; each called-for, there and then. Not a mealy-mouthed man! A candid ferocity, if the case call for it, is in him; he does not mince matters! The War of Tabûc is a thing he often speaks of: his men refused, many of them, to march on that occasion: pleaded the heat of the weather, the harvest, and so forth; he can never forget that. Your harvest? It 307lasts for a day. What will become of your harvest through all Eternity? Hot weather? Yes, it was hot; ‘but Hell will be hotter!’ Sometimes a rough sarcasm turns-up: He says to the unbelievers, Ye shall have the just measure of your deeds at that Great Day. They will be weighed-out to you; ye shall not have short weight!—Everywhere he fixes the matter in his eye; he sees it: his heart, now and then, is as if struck dumb by the greatness of it. ‘Assuredly,’ he says: that word, in the Koran, is written-down sometimes as a sentence by itself: ‘Assuredly.’
I like Muhammad for his complete lack of pretense. He's a rugged, self-reliant person from the wilderness; he doesn't pretend to be anything he's not. There's no showy pride in him; however, he doesn’t lean too much on humility either: he exists as he is, in a cloak and shoes he made himself; he speaks plainly to all kinds of Persian kings and Greek emperors about what they need to do; he knows well enough the respect that is due to him. In a life-and-death battle with Bedouins, cruel things were inevitable; but he also showed mercy, natural pity, and generosity. Muhammad doesn't apologize for one nor boast about the other. Each action was a free choice of his heart; each was needed, right there and then. He’s not someone who sugarcoats things! If the situation calls for it, he has a straightforward ferocity; he doesn’t hold back! He often talks about the Battle of Tabûk: many of his men refused to march that time; they complained about the heat, the harvest, and so on; he can never forget that. Your harvest? It lasts for a day. What will happen to your harvest for all eternity? Yes, it was hot; but ‘Hell will be hotter!’ Sometimes he has a bit of rough sarcasm: he tells the unbelievers, You will get exactly what you deserve on that Great Day. They will be weighed and measured; you will not get shortchanged!—Everywhere, he focuses on this matter; he sees it: his heart, sometimes, is almost stunned by its enormity. ‘Certainly,’ he says: that word, in the Quran, is sometimes written down as a standalone sentence: ‘Certainly.’
No Dilettantism in this Mahomet; it is a business of Reprobation and Salvation with him, of Time and Eternity: he is in deadly earnest about it! Dilettantism, hypothesis, speculation, a kind of amateur-search for Truth, toying and coquetting with Truth: this is the sorest sin. The root of all other imaginable sins. It consists in the heart and soul of the man never having been open to Truth;—‘living in a vain show.’ Such a man not only utters and produces falsehoods, but is himself a falsehood. The rational moral principle, spark of the Divinity, is sunk deep in him, in quiet paralysis of life-death. The very falsehoods of Mahomet are truer than the truths of such a man. He is the insincere man: smooth-polished, respectable in some times and places: inoffensive, says nothing harsh to anybody; most cleanly,—just as carbonic acid is, which is death and poison.
No Dilettantism in this Muhammad; it's a matter of Reprobation and Salvation for him, of Time and Eternity: he’s completely serious about it! Dilettantism, hypothesis, speculation—a sort of amateur search for Truth, playing around and flirting with Truth: this is the worst sin. It is the root of all other imaginable sins. It means that the heart and soul of the person have never been open to Truth;—‘living in a vain show.’ Such a person not only speaks and creates falsehoods but is a falsehood themselves. The rational moral principle, a spark of Divinity, is deeply buried in them, in a quiet paralysis of life and death. The very falsehoods of Muhammad are truer than the truths of such a person. He is the insincere person: smooth-polished, respectable in certain times and places: harmless, says nothing harsh to anyone; most cleanly—just like carbonic acid, which is death and poison.
We will not praise Mahomet’s moral precepts as always of the superfinest sort; yet it can be said that there is always a tendency to good in them; that they are the true dictates of a heart aiming towards what is just and true. The sublime forgiveness of Christianity, turning of the other cheek when the one has been smitten, is not here: you are to revenge yourself, but it is to be in measure, not overmuch, or beyond justice. On the other hand, Islam, like any great Faith, and insight into the essence of man, is a perfect equaliser of men: the soul of one believer outweighs all earthly kingships; all men, according to Islam too, are equal. Mahomet insists not on the propriety of giving alms, but on the necessity of it; he marks-down by law how 308much you are to give, and it is at your peril if you neglect. The tenth part of a man’s annual income, whatever that may be, is the property of the poor, of those that are afflicted and need help. Good all this: the natural voice of humanity, of pity and equity dwelling in the heart of this wild Son of Nature speaks so.
We won’t say that Muhammad’s moral teachings are always top-notch; however, they do show a consistent tendency toward good. They reflect the true impulses of a heart striving for justice and truth. The deep forgiveness found in Christianity, the idea of turning the other cheek when struck, isn’t present here: you are expected to seek revenge, but it should be measured, not excessive or unjust. On the other hand, Islam, like any major faith, offers profound insight into human nature and serves as a great equalizer: the soul of one believer is worth more than all earthly kingships; all people are equal in the eyes of Islam. Muhammad emphasizes the necessity of giving to those in need, not just the appropriateness of it; he legally mandates how much you should give, and neglecting this is at your own risk. A tenth of a person’s annual income, regardless of the amount, belongs to the poor, to those who are suffering and in need of assistance. This is all good: the innate voice of humanity, compassion, and fairness within this wild Son of Nature expresses it so.
Mahomet’s Paradise is sensual, his Hell sensual: true; in the one and the other there is enough that shocks all spiritual feeling in us. But we are to recollect that the Arabs already had it so; that Mahomet, in whatever he changed of it, softened and diminished all this. The worst sensualities, too, are the work of doctors, followers of his, not his work. In the Koran there is really very little said about the joys of Paradise; they are intimated rather than insisted on. Nor is it forgotten that the highest joys even there shall be spiritual; the pure Presence of the Highest, this shall infinitely transcend all other joys. He says, ‘Your salutation shall be, Peace.’ Salam, Have Peace!—the thing that all rational souls long for, and seek, vainly here below, as the one blessing. ‘Ye shall sit on seats, facing one another: all grudges shall be taken away out of your hearts.’ All grudges! Ye shall love one another freely; for each of you, in the eyes of his brothers, there will be Heaven enough!
Mahomet’s Paradise is sensual, and so is his Hell: it’s true; both are enough to shock all our spiritual feelings. But we need to remember that the Arabs had it like this already; Mahomet, in whatever changes he made, softened and reduced all of it. The worst sensualities are actually the work of doctors, his followers, not his own. In the Koran, there’s really not much said about the pleasures of Paradise; they’re suggested rather than emphasized. It’s also noted that the highest joys there will be spiritual; the pure Presence of the Highest will infinitely surpass all other joys. He says, ‘Your salutation shall be, Peace.’ Salam, Have Peace!—the thing that all rational souls long for and seek, often in vain, here on Earth, as the ultimate blessing. ‘You shall sit on thrones, facing one another: all grudges will be removed from your hearts.’ All grudges! You will love each other freely; for each of you, in the eyes of your brothers, there will be enough Heaven!
In reference to this of the sensual Paradise and Mahomet’s sensuality, the sorest chapter of all for us, there were many things to be said; which it is not convenient to enter upon here. Two remarks only I shall make, and therewith leave it to your candour. The first is furnished me by Goethe; it is a casual hint of his which seems well worth taking note of. In one of his Delineations, in Meister’s Travels it is, the hero comes-upon a Society of men with very strange ways, one of which was this: “We require,” says the Master, “that each of our people shall restrict himself in one direction,” shall go right against his desire in one matter, and make himself do the thing he does not wish, “should we allow him the greater latitude on all other sides.” There seems to me a great justness in this. Enjoying things which are pleasant; that is not the evil: it is the reducing of our moral self to 309slavery by them that is. Let a man assert withal that he is king over his habitudes; that he could and would shake them off, on cause shown: this is an excellent law. The Month Ramadhan for the Moslem, much in Mahomet’s Religion, much in his own Life, bears in that direction; if not by forethought, or clear purpose of moral improvement on his part, then by a certain healthy manful instinct, which is as good.
In relation to the sensual Paradise and Mahomet’s sensuality, the most difficult chapter for us, there's a lot to discuss, but it’s not the right place to go into it all. I’ll just make two remarks and leave the rest to your judgment. The first comes from Goethe; it's a casual thought of his that seems worth noting. In one of his works, Meister’s Travels, the hero encounters a group of men with very unusual customs, one of which is this: “We require,” says the Master, “that each person among us restricts themselves in one area,” meaning they should go against their desire in one specific matter and force themselves to do something they don’t want to do, “so that we can give them more freedom in all other areas.” I find great wisdom in this. Enjoying pleasant things isn’t the problem; the real issue is becoming a moral slave to them. A man should declare that he is in control of his habits; that he could and would break free from them if he had a good reason to do so: this is a strong principle. The Month of Ramadan for Muslims, much of what is in Mahomet’s Religion, and much of his own Life aligns with this idea; whether through forethought or a clear intention for moral improvement, or simply a healthy instinct, which is just as valuable.
But there is another thing to be said about the Mahometan Heaven and Hell. This namely, that, however gross and material they may be, they are an emblem of an everlasting truth, not always so well remembered elsewhere. That gross sensual Paradise of his; that horrible flaming Hell; the great enormous Day of Judgment he perpetually insists on: what is all this but a rude shadow, in the rude Bedouin imagination, of that grand spiritual Fact, and Beginning of Facts, which it is ill for us too if we do not all know and feel: the Infinite Nature of Duty? That man’s actions here are of infinite moment to him, and never die or end at all; that man, with his little life, reaches upwards high as Heaven, downwards low as Hell, and in his threescore years of Time holds an Eternity fearfully and wonderfully hidden: all this had burnt itself, as in flame-characters, into the wild Arab soul. As in flame and lightning, it stands written there; awful, unspeakable, ever present to him. With bursting earnestness, with a fierce savage sincerity, halt, articulating, not able to articulate, he strives to speak it, bodies it forth in that Heaven and that Hell. Bodied forth in what way you will, it is the first of all truths. It is venerable under all embodiments. What is the chief end of man here below? Mahomet has answered this question, in a way that might put some of us to shame! He does not, like a Bentham, a Paley, take Right and Wrong, and calculate the profit and loss, ultimate pleasure of the one and of the other; and summing all up by addition and subtraction into a net result, ask you, Whether on the whole the Right does not preponderate considerably? No, it is not better to do the one than the other; the one is to the other as life is to death,—as Heaven is to Hell. The one must 310in nowise be done, the other in nowise left undone. You shall not measure them; they are incommensurable: the one is death eternal to a man, the other is life eternal. Benthamee Utility, virtue by Profit and Loss; reducing this God’s-world to a dead brute Steam-engine, the infinite celestial Soul of Man to a kind of Hay-balance for weighing hay and thistles on, pleasures and pains on:—If you ask me which gives, Mahomet or they, the beggarlier and falser view of Man and his Destinies in this Universe, I will answer, It is not Mahomet!——
But there's another thing to say about the Muslim Heaven and Hell. Specifically, that, no matter how crude and material they may be, they symbolize an everlasting truth that isn't always remembered elsewhere. That crude sensual Paradise of his; that terrifying, fiery Hell; the immense Day of Judgment he constantly talks about: what are all of these but a rough shadow, in the simple Bedouin imagination, of that grand spiritual truth, and the Beginning of Truths, which it's troubling for us if we don't all know and feel: the Infinite Nature of Duty? That a person's actions here are of infinite significance to him, and never die or come to an end; that a man, in his brief life, reaches as high as Heaven, as low as Hell, and in his sixty years of time holds an eternity hidden in a fearful and wonderful way: all this has burned itself, like flame-characters, into the wild Arab soul. It stands written there, as if in flame and lightning; awful, unspeakable, always present to him. With intense earnestness, with fierce, savage sincerity, struggling to speak it, unable to articulate, he expresses it, bringing it to life in that Heaven and that Hell. However you phrase it, it is the first of all truths. It is respected in all its forms. What is the chief purpose of man here on Earth? Muhammad has answered this question in a way that might put some of us to shame! He doesn’t, like Bentham or Paley, analyze Right and Wrong, calculating the profit and loss, the ultimate pleasure of one versus the other; and by adding and subtracting them into a net result, ask you if, overall, the Right doesn’t greatly outweigh the Wrong? No, it's not better to do one than the other; one is to the other as life is to death — as Heaven is to Hell. One must 310 never be done, and the other must never be left undone. You can't measure them; they're incomparable: one means eternal death for a person, the other means eternal life. Benthamite Utility, virtue measured by Profit and Loss; reducing this God’s world to a lifeless, brutish Steam-engine, and the infinite celestial Soul of Man to a scale for weighing hay and thistles, pleasures and pains: — If you ask me who presents the poorer and false view of Man and his Destinies in this Universe, I will say, it is not Muhammad!——
On the whole, we will repeat that this Religion of Mahomet’s is a kind of Christianity; has a genuine element of what is spiritually highest looking through it, not to be hidden by all its imperfections. The Scandinavian God Wish, the god of all rude men,—this has been enlarged into a Heaven by Mahomet; but a Heaven symbolical of sacred Duty, and to be earned by faith and welldoing, by valiant action, and a divine patience which is still more valiant. It is Scandinavian Paganism, and a truly celestial element superadded to that. Call it not false; look not at the falsehood of it, look at the truth of it. For these twelve centuries, it has been the religion and life-guidance of the fifth part of the whole kindred of Mankind. Above all things, it has been a religion heartily believed. These Arabs believe their religion, and try to live by it! No Christians, since the early ages, or only perhaps the English Puritans in modern times, have ever stood by their Faith as the Moslem do by theirs,—believing it wholly, fronting Time with it, and Eternity with it. This night the watchman on the streets of Cairo when he cries “Who goes?” will hear from the passenger, along with his answer, “There is no God but God.” Allah akbar, Islam, sounds through the souls, and whole daily existence, of these dusky millions. Zealous missionaries preach it abroad among Malays, black Papuans, brutal Idolaters;—displacing what is worse, nothing that is better or good.
Overall, we can say that the religion of Muhammad is a form of Christianity; it contains a genuine element of the highest spiritual truth that can’t be overshadowed by its flaws. The Scandinavian god Wish, the deity worshiped by all rough men, has been expanded into a Heaven by Muhammad; but this Heaven symbolizes sacred Duty, to be attained through faith and good deeds, through brave actions, and a divine patience that is even more courageous. It combines Scandinavian Paganism with a truly celestial element added to it. Don’t call it false; don’t focus on its falsehoods, focus on its truths. For the past twelve centuries, it has been the religion and guiding principle for one-fifth of all humanity. Above all, it has been a faith that people sincerely believe. The Arabs believe in their religion and strive to live by it! No Christians since the early days, or maybe just the English Puritans in modern times, have upheld their faith as steadfastly as Muslims do—completely believing it, confronting Time and Eternity with it. This night, the watchman on the streets of Cairo, when he calls out “Who goes there?” will hear from the passerby, along with their answer, “There is no God but God.” Allah akbar, Islam, resonates through the hearts and daily lives of these countless souls. Passionate missionaries spread it among Malays, black Papuans, and brutal idolaters—replacing what is worse, but nothing better or good.
To the Arab Nation it was as a birth from darkness into light; Arabia first became alive by means of it. A poor shepherd people, roaming unnoticed in its deserts 311since the creation of the world: a Hero-Prophet was sent down to them with a word they could believe: see, the unnoticed becomes world-notable, the small has grown world-great; within one century afterwards, Arabia is at Grenada on this hand, at Delhi on that;—glancing in valour and splendour and the light of genius, Arabia shines through long ages over a great section of the world. Belief is great, life-giving. The history of a Nation becomes fruitful, soul-elevating, great, so soon as it believes. These Arabs, the man Mahomet, and that one century,—is it not as if a spark had fallen, one spark, on a world of what seemed black unnoticeable sand; but lo, the sand proves explosive powder, blazes heaven-high from Delhi to Grenada! I said, the Great Man was always as lightning out of Heaven; the rest of men waited for him like fuel, and then they too would flame.
To the Arab Nation, it was like being born from darkness into light; Arabia came alive through it. A struggling shepherd people, wandering unnoticed in their deserts since the beginning of time: a Hero-Prophet was sent to them with a message they could believe in: look, what was unnoticed became world-renowned, the small became great on a global scale; within just one century, Arabia was stretching from Grenada on one side to Delhi on the other; showing bravery, brilliance, and the light of genius, Arabia lit up the ages over a vast part of the world. Belief is powerful and life-giving. The history of a Nation becomes fruitful, uplifting, and significant as soon as it believes. These Arabs, the man Mahomet, and that one century—it's as if a single spark fell on a world that seemed like ordinary black sand; but behold, that sand turns out to be explosive powder, erupting sky-high from Delhi to Grenada! I said, the Great Man is always like lightning from Heaven; the rest of humanity awaited him like fuel, and then they too would ignite.
LECTURE III
Lecture 3
THE HERO AS POET. DANTE; SHAKSPEARE.
[Tuesday, 12th May 1840]
[Tuesday, May 12, 1840]
The Hero as Divinity, the Hero as Prophet, are productions of old ages; not to be repeated in the new. They presuppose a certain rudeness of conception, which the progress of mere scientific knowledge puts an end to. There needs to be, as it were, a world vacant, or almost vacant of scientific forms, if men in their loving wonder are to fancy their fellow-man either a god or one speaking with the voice of a god. Divinity and Prophet are past. We are now to see our Hero in the less ambitious, but also less questionable, character of Poet; a character which does not pass. The Poet is a heroic figure belonging to all ages; whom all ages possess, when once he is produced, whom the newest age as the oldest may produce;—and will produce, always when Nature pleases. Let Nature send a Hero-soul; 312in no age is it other than possible that he may be shaped into a Poet.
The Hero as a God, the Hero as a Prophet, belong to ancient times; they won't be seen again in the modern era. They assume a certain simplicity in thinking, which the advancement of scientific knowledge eliminates. There needs to be, so to speak, a world largely devoid of scientific understanding for people, in their wonder and admiration, to imagine their fellow human as either a god or someone speaking with a divine voice. The concepts of Divinity and Prophet are behind us. Now, we are to view our Hero in the more humble, yet less questionable, role of Poet; a role that endures. The Poet is a heroic figure of all times; available to every era once he emerges, and any age, whether new or old, can bring him forth;—and will do so whenever Nature wills it. If Nature sends forth a Heroic spirit; 312 in no age is it impossible for him to become a Poet.
Hero, Prophet, Poet,—many different names, in different times and places, do we give to Great Men; according to varieties we note in them, according to the sphere in which they have displayed themselves! We might give many more names, on this same principle. I will remark again, however, as a fact not unimportant to be understood, that the different sphere constitutes the grand origin of such distinction; that the Hero can be Poet, Prophet, King, Priest or what you will, according to the kind of world he finds himself born into. I confess, I have no notion of a truly great man that could not be all sorts of men. The Poet who could merely sit on a chair, and compose stanzas, would never make a stanza worth much. He could not sing the Heroic warrior, unless he himself were at least a Heroic warrior too. I fancy there is in him the Politician, the Thinker, Legislator, Philosopher;—in one or the other degree, he could have been, he is all these. So too I cannot understand how a Mirabeau, with that great glowing heart, with the fire that was in it, with the bursting tears that were in it, could not have written verses, tragedies, poems, touched all hearts in that way, had his course of life and education led him thitherward. The grand fundamental character is that of Great Man; that the man be great. Napoleon has words in him which are like Austerlitz Battles. Louis Fourteenth’s Marshals are a kind of poetical men withal; the things Turenne says are full of sagacity and geniality, like sayings of Samuel Johnson. The great heart, the clear deep-seeing eye: there it lies; no man whatever, in what province soever, can prosper at all without these. Petrarch and Boccaccio did diplomatic messages, it seems, quite well: one can easily believe it; they had done things a little harder than these! Burns, a gifted song-writer, might have made a still better Mirabeau. Shakspeare,—one knows not what he could not have made, in the supreme degree.
Hero, Prophet, Poet—you can call Great Men by many names in different times and places, based on the unique traits we see in them and the roles they've taken on! We could come up with even more names using the same idea. I want to point out, though, that the different sphere is the main reason for such distinctions; a Hero can be a Poet, Prophet, King, Priest, or anything else, depending on the type of world he was born into. Honestly, I can't imagine a truly great person who couldn't be all sorts of people. A Poet who just sits in a chair and writes stanzas wouldn't create anything worthwhile. He couldn't celebrate the Heroic warrior unless he himself was at least a Heroic warrior as well. I believe he also has the Politician, Thinker, Legislator, and Philosopher in him; to some degree, he could be all of these. Likewise, I can't understand how someone like Mirabeau, with that passionate heart, that inner fire, and those overflowing tears, couldn't have written verses, tragedies, or poems that deeply touched others, if his life and education had guided him that way. The essential quality is being a Great Man; that the person is truly great. Napoleon has words in him that resonate like the Battles of Austerlitz. Louis Fourteenth's Marshals have a poetic side; Turenne's words are full of wisdom and warmth, much like sayings from Samuel Johnson. The great heart and the clear, insightful eye—those are essential; no one can truly succeed in any field without them. Petrarch and Boccaccio handled diplomatic messages quite well, seemingly; you can easily believe that—they had tackled even tougher challenges! Burns, a talented songwriter, might have made an even better Mirabeau. Shakespeare—who knows what he could have accomplished at the highest level!
True, there are aptitudes of Nature too. Nature does not make all great men, more than all other men, in the self-same mould. Varieties of aptitude doubtless; 313but infinitely more of circumstance; and far oftenest it is the latter only that are looked to. But it is as with common men in the learning of trades. You take any man, as yet a vague capability of a man, who could be any kind of craftsman; and make him into a smith, a carpenter, a mason: he is then and thenceforth that and nothing else. And if, as Addison complains, you sometimes see a street-porter staggering under his load on spindle-shanks, and near at hand a tailor with the frame of a Samson handling a bit of cloth and small Whitechapel needle,—it cannot be considered that aptitude of Nature alone has been consulted here either!—The Great Man also, to what shall he be bound apprentice? Given your Hero, is he to become Conqueror, King, Philosopher, Poet? It is an inexplicably complex controversial-calculation between the world and him! He will read the world and its laws; the world with its laws will be there to be read. What the world, on this matter, shall permit and bid is, as we said, the most important fact about the world.—
Sure, there are natural talents too. Nature doesn’t make all great men, just like it doesn’t make all other men, in the same way. There are definitely different kinds of talents; 313 but far more important are the circumstances; and more often than not, it’s the latter that people focus on. It’s similar to how regular people learn trades. You take any guy, who is just a vague potential, and he could be any type of craftsman—then you train him to be a blacksmith, a carpenter, or a mason: he becomes that and nothing else. If, as Addison complains, you sometimes see a street porter struggling under a heavy load with skinny legs, while nearby a tailor with the strength of Samson struggles with a small piece of cloth and a tiny Whitechapel needle—one can’t say that only natural talent has been taken into account here either! The Great Man, what will he apprentice in? Given your Hero, is he to become a Conqueror, King, Philosopher, or Poet? It’s a complicated and controversial calculation between him and the world! He will learn about the world and its rules; the world with its rules will be there to be understood. What the world will allow and dictate about this subject is, as we mentioned, the most crucial fact about it.
Poet and Prophet differ greatly in our loose modern notions of them. In some old languages, again, the titles are synonymous; Vates means both Prophet and Poet: and indeed at all times, Prophet and Poet, well understood, have much kindred of meaning. Fundamentally indeed they are still the same; in this most important respect especially, That they have penetrated both of them into the sacred mystery of the Universe; what Goethe calls ‘the open secret.’ “Which is the great secret?” asks one.—“The open secret,”—open to all, seen by almost none! That divine mystery, which lies everywhere in all Beings, ‘the Divine Idea of the World, that which lies at the bottom of Appearance,’ as Fichte styles it; of which all Appearance, from the starry sky to the grass of the field, but especially the Appearance of Man and his work, is but the vesture, the embodiment that renders it visible. This divine mystery is in all times and in all places; veritably is. In most times and places it is greatly overlooked; and the Universe, definable always in one or the other dialect, as the realised Thought of God, 314is considered a trivial, inert, commonplace matter,—as if, says the Satirist, it were a dead thing, which some upholsterer had put together! It could do no good at present, to speak much about this; but it is a pity for every one of us if we do not know it, live ever in the knowledge of it. Really a most mournful pity;—a failure to live at all, if we live otherwise!
Poets and prophets are viewed very differently in our modern understanding. In some ancient languages, the terms are interchangeable; Vates means both prophet and poet. In fact, throughout history, these two roles share a lot of common ground. At their core, they remain the same, especially in this crucial aspect: both have delved into the deep mystery of the Universe, what Goethe refers to as "the open secret.” “What is the great secret?” someone asks.—“The open secret”—accessible to all, yet seen by very few! That divine mystery, present in all beings, "the Divine Idea of the World, that which underlies Appearance," as Fichte puts it; all appearances, from the starry sky to the grass in the field, and especially the appearance of humanity and our creations, are merely the vesture, the representation that makes it visible. This divine mystery exists at all times and in all places; it truly does. In many times and places, it’s largely ignored; the Universe, which can always be defined in various ways as the realized Thought of God, 314is often seen as a trivial, lifeless, mundane thing—as if, as the satirist puts it, it were a lifeless object that someone had cobbled together! It wouldn’t do much good to speak extensively about this now; however, it’s a shame for each of us if we don’t understand it and live constantly in awareness of it. Truly, it’s a very sad loss—an inability to truly live if we exist otherwise!
But now, I say, whoever may forget this divine mystery, the Vates, whether Prophet or Poet, has penetrated into it; is a man sent hither to make it more impressively known to us. That always is his message; he is to reveal that to us,—that sacred mystery which he more than others lives ever present with. While others forget it, he knows it;—I might say, he has been driven to know it; without consent asked of him, he finds himself living in it, bound to live in it. Once more, here is no Hearsay, but a direct Insight and Belief; this man too could not help being a sincere man! Whosoever may live in the shows of things, it is for him a necessity of nature to live in the very fact of things. A man once more, in earnest with the Universe, though all others were but toying with it. He is a Vates, first of all, in virtue of being sincere. So far Poet and Prophet, participators in the ‘open secret,’ are one.
But now, I say, whoever may forget this divine mystery, the Vates, whether Prophet or Poet, has delved into it; he is a person sent here to make it more powerfully known to us. That is always his message; he is here to reveal that to us—this sacred mystery that he, more than others, is always aware of. While others forget it, he knows it;—I could say he has been compelled to know it; without his consent, he finds himself living in it, bound to live in it. Once again, this is no hearsay, but a direct insight and belief; this man cannot help but be sincere! Whoever may live in the appearances of things, for him it is a necessity of nature to live in the reality of things. A man, once more, genuinely engaged with the Universe, while everyone else toys with it. He is a Vates, primarily because he is sincere. So far, Poet and Prophet, sharing in the ‘open secret,’ are one.
With respect to their distinction again: The Vates Prophet, we might say, has seized that sacred mystery rather on the moral side, as Good and Evil, Duty and Prohibition; the Vates Poet on what the Germans call the æsthetic side, as Beautiful, and the like. The one we may call a revealer of what we are to do, the other of what we are to love. But indeed these two provinces run into one another, and cannot be disjoined. The Prophet too has his eye on what we are to love: how else shall he know what it is we are to do? The highest Voice ever heard on this earth said withal, “Consider the lilies of the field; they toil not, neither do they spin: yet Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these.” A glance, that, into the deepest deep of Beauty. ‘The lilies of the field,’—dressed finer than earthly princes, springing-up there in the humble furrow-field; a beautiful eye looking-out on you, from 315the great inner Sea of Beauty! How could the rude Earth make these, if her Essence, rugged as she looks and is, were not inwardly Beauty? In this point of view, too, a saying of Goethe’s, which has staggered several, may have meaning: ‘The Beautiful,’ he intimates, ‘is higher than the Good: the Beautiful includes in it the Good.’ The true Beautiful; which however, I have said somewhere, ‘differs from the false as Heaven does from Vauxhall!’ So much for the distinction and identity of Poet and Prophet.—
Regarding their distinction again: The Vates Prophet is mainly concerned with moral aspects, focusing on Good and Evil, Duty and Prohibition, while the Vates Poet is engaged with the aesthetic side, such as Beauty and similar concepts. We can think of one as revealing what we should do and the other as showing what we should love. However, these two areas overlap and can't be separated. The Prophet also considers what we should love; otherwise, how would he know what we should do? The most profound voice ever heard on this earth said, “Consider the lilies of the field; they do not labor, nor do they spin: yet Solomon in all his glory was not dressed like one of these.” That is a glimpse into the deepest essence of Beauty. ‘The lilies of the field’—clothed more splendidly than earthly princes, blooming in the simple furrow-field; a beautiful eye looking out at you from the great inner Sea of Beauty! How could the rough Earth create these if her Essence, as harsh as it appears, isn’t fundamentally Beauty? From this perspective, a remark by Goethe, which has puzzled many, may hold truth: ‘The Beautiful,’ he suggests, ‘is superior to the Good: the Beautiful encompasses the Good.’ The true Beautiful; which, as I've mentioned before, ‘differs from the false like Heaven differs from Vauxhall!’ So much for the distinction and unity of the Poet and the Prophet.—
In ancient and also in modern periods we find a few Poets who are accounted perfect; whom it were a kind of treason to find fault with. This is noteworthy; this is right: yet in strictness it is only an illusion. At bottom, clearly enough, there is no perfect Poet! A vein of Poetry exists in the hearts of all men; no man is made altogether of Poetry. We are all poets when we read a poem well. The ‘imagination that shudders at the Hell of Dante,’ is not that the same faculty, weaker in degree, as Dante’s own? No one but Shakspeare can embody, out of Saxo Grammaticus, the story of Hamlet as Shakspeare did: but every one models some kind of story out of it; every one embodies it better or worse. We need not spend time in defining. Where there is no specific difference, as between round and square, all definition must be more or less arbitrary. A man that has so much more of the poetic element developed in him as to have become noticeable, will be called Poet by his neighbours. World-Poets too, those whom we are to take for perfect Poets, are settled by critics in the same way. One who rises so far above the general level of Poets will, to such and such critics, seem a Universal Poet; as he ought to do. And yet it is, and must be, an arbitrary distinction. All Poets, all men, have some touches of the Universal; no man is wholly made of that. Most Poets are very soon forgotten: but not the noblest Shakspeare or Homer of them can be remembered forever;—a day comes when he too is not!
In both ancient and modern times, there are a few Poets considered perfect; it would almost be treason to criticize them. This is significant and true, yet strictly speaking, it's just an illusion. Deep down, it's clear that no Poet is truly perfect! There’s a spark of Poetry in everyone; no one is entirely made of Poetry. We all become poets when we read a poem well. The 'imagination that shudders at Dante's Hell'—isn't that just a weaker version of Dante’s own talent? No one but Shakespeare can tell the story of Hamlet from Saxo Grammaticus like he did, but everyone interprets the story in their own way; everyone embodies it, for better or worse. We don't need to waste time on definitions. When there’s no clear difference, like between round and square, all definitions become somewhat arbitrary. A person who has developed the poetic element enough to stand out will be labeled a Poet by their peers. Similarly, World-Poets, those we consider perfect Poets, are judged by critics in the same manner. Someone who rises so far above the average Poet may be seen as a Universal Poet by certain critics, as they should be. Yet, this is, and must remain, an arbitrary distinction. All Poets, all people, possess some hints of the Universal; no one is entirely composed of it. Most Poets are quickly forgotten, but not even the greatest, Shakespeare or Homer, can be remembered forever;—there comes a day when they too will not be!
Nevertheless, you will say, there must be a difference between true Poetry and true Speech not poetical: what is the difference? On this point many things have been 316written, especially by late German Critics, some of which are not very intelligible at first. They say, for example, that the Poet has an infinitude in him; communicates an Unendlichkeit, a certain character of ‘infinitude,’ to whatsoever he delineates. This, though not very precise, yet on so vague a matter is worth remembering: if well meditated, some meaning will gradually be found in it. For my own part, I find considerable meaning in the old vulgar distinction of Poetry being metrical, having music in it, being a Song. Truly, if pressed to give a definition, one might say this as soon as anything else: If your delineation be authentically musical, musical, not in word only, but in heart and substance, in all the thoughts and utterances of it, in the whole conception of it, then it will be poetical; if not, not.—Musical: how much lies in that! A musical thought is one spoken by a mind that has penetrated into the inmost heart of the thing; detected the inmost mystery of it, namely the melody that lies hidden in it; the inward harmony of coherence which is its soul, whereby it exists, and has a right to be, here in this world. All inmost things, we may say, are melodious; naturally utter themselves in Song. The meaning of Song goes deep. Who is there that, in logical words, can express the effect music has on us? A kind of inarticulate unfathomable speech, which leads us to the edge of the Infinite, and lets us for moments gaze into that!
Nevertheless, you might say, there has to be a difference between true Poetry and true Speech that isn't poetic: what is that difference? Many things have been written about this, especially by recent German Critics, some of which are not very clear at first. They argue, for example, that the Poet has an infinitude within them; that they convey an Unendlichkeit, a certain sense of ‘infinitude,’ in whatever they depict. While this may not be very specific, it’s something to keep in mind when considering such an ambiguous topic: if reflected upon, some meaning will gradually emerge from it. Personally, I find significant meaning in the old common distinction that Poetry is metrical, has music in it, and is essentially a Song. Honestly, if asked to define it, one might describe it this way as easily as any other: If what you're depicting is truly musical, musical not just in words but in spirit and essence, in all its thoughts and expressions, in its overall idea, then it will be poetic; if not, then it won’t. —Musical: how much is contained in that! A musical thought is one expressed by a mind that has delved into the very core of the matter; uncovered its deepest secret, namely the melody hidden within it; the internal harmony of coherence that forms its essence, the reason it exists, and has a place in this world. We might say that all essential things are melodious; they naturally express themselves in Song. The significance of Song runs deep. Who among us can articulate in logical words the impact music has on us? It’s a kind of inexpressible, unfathomable speech that brings us to the brink of the Infinite and allows us to glimpse into it for a moment!
Nay all speech, even the commonest speech, has something of song in it: not a parish in the world but has its parish-accent;—the rhythm or tune to which the people there sing what they have to say! Accent is a kind of chanting; all men have accent of their own,—though they only notice that of others. Observe too how all passionate language does of itself become musical,—with a finer music than the mere accent; the speech of a man even in zealous anger becomes a chant, a song. All deep things are Song. It seems somehow the very central essence of us, Song; as if all the rest were but wrappages and hulls! The primal element of us; of us, and of all things. The Greeks fabled of Sphere-Harmonies; it was the feeling they had of the 317inner structure of Nature; that the soul of all her voices and utterances was perfect music. Poetry, therefore, we will call musical Thought. The Poet is he who thinks in that manner. At bottom, it turns still on power of intellect; it is a man’s sincerity and depth of vision that makes him a Poet. See deep enough, and you see musically; the heart of Nature being everywhere music, if you can only reach it.
Every form of speech, even the most ordinary, has a hint of melody in it: no community in the world lacks its unique accent;—the rhythm or tune that the locals sing in their conversations! Accent is a type of chant; everyone has their own accent—though they typically only notice those of others. Notice how all passionate language naturally becomes musical,—with a deeper melody than simple accent; even speech from a man in fervent anger turns into a chant, a song. All profound things are Song. It seems to be the very core of our being, Song; as if everything else is just wrapping and shells! It's the essential element of us; of us, and of everything. The Greeks spoke of Sphere-Harmonies; they believed it reflected their understanding of the 317underlying structure of Nature; that the essence of all her voices and expressions was perfect music. So, let’s define Poetry as musical Thought. A Poet is someone who thinks in this way. Ultimately, it still relies on intellectual capability; it’s a person’s sincerity and depth of insight that makes them a Poet. Look deeply enough, and you’ll see musically; the heart of Nature being music everywhere, if you can only access it.
The Vates Poet, with his melodious Apocalypse of Nature, seems to hold a poor rank among us, in comparison with the Vates Prophet; his function, and our esteem of him for his function, alike slight. The Hero taken as Divinity; the Hero taken as Prophet; then next the Hero taken only as Poet: does it not look as if our estimate of the Great Man, epoch after epoch, were continually diminishing? We take him first for a god, then for one god-inspired; and now in the next stage of it, his most miraculous word gains from us only the recognition that he is a Poet, beautiful verse-maker, man of genius, or suchlike!—It looks so; but I persuade myself that intrinsically it is not so. If we consider well, it will perhaps appear that in man still there is the same altogether peculiar admiration for the Heroic Gift, by what name soever called, that there at any time was.
The Vates Poet, with his beautiful Apocalypse of Nature, seems to hold a low status among us compared to the Vates Prophet; both his role and our regard for it are equally minimal. The Hero seen as a God; the Hero seen as a Prophet; and then the Hero seen merely as a Poet: doesn’t it seem like our view of the Great Man, generation after generation, keeps shrinking? We first see him as a divine being, then as someone inspired by the divine; and now, in the next phase, his most amazing words earn him just the title of Poet, a creator of beautiful verses, a man of talent, or something like that!—It may seem that way, but I convince myself that fundamentally it isn’t. If we think about it deeply, we might realize that in humanity there still exists the same unique admiration for the Heroic Gift, regardless of what we call it, just as there always has been.
I should say, if we do not now reckon a Great Man literally divine, it is that our notions of God, of the supreme unattainable Fountain of Splendour, Wisdom and Heroism, are ever rising higher; not altogether that our reverence for these qualities, as manifested in our like, is getting lower. This is worth taking thought of. Sceptical Dilettantism, the curse of these ages, a curse which will not last forever, does indeed in this the highest province of human things, as in all provinces, make sad work; and our reverence for great men, all crippled, blinded, paralytic as it is, comes out in poor plight, hardly recognisable. Men worship the shows of great men; the most disbelieve that there is any reality of great men to worship. The dreariest, fatalest faith; believing which, one would literally despair of human things. Nevertheless look, for example, at Napoleon! A Corsican lieutenant of artillery; that is the show of him: yet is he not obeyed, worshipped after his sort, as 318all the Tiaraed and Diademed of the world put together could not be? High Duchesses, and ostlers of inns, gather round the Scottish rustic, Burns;—a strange feeling dwelling in each that they had never heard a man like this; that, on the whole, this is the man! In the secret heart of these people it still dimly reveals itself, though there is no accredited way of uttering it at present, that this rustic, with his black brows and flashing sun-eyes, and strange words moving laughter and tears, is of a dignity far beyond all others, incommensurable with all others. Do not we feel it so? But now, were Dilettantism, Scepticism, Triviality, and all that sorrowful brood, cast-out of us,—as, by God’s blessing, they shall one day be; were faith in the shows of things entirely swept-out, replaced by clear faith in the things, so that a man acted on the impulse of that only, and counted the other non-extant; what a new livelier feeling towards this Burns were it!
I have to say, if we don't currently see a Great Man as literally divine, it's because our ideas of God, the ultimate, unattainable source of brilliance, wisdom, and heroism are continually rising higher; not just because our respect for these qualities manifested in people is decreasing. This is worth considering. Skeptical Dilettantism, a curse of our time, which won't last forever, really does mess things up in this highest realm of human experience, just like in other areas. Our reverence for great men, even though it’s all twisted, blurred, and paralyzed, ends up in a sorry state, almost unrecognizable. People worship the image of great men; most don't believe there's any real greatness to admire. It’s a bleak, devastating belief; holding on to it makes you feel hopeless about humanity. But look at Napoleon, for example! A Corsican artillery officer; that's the image of him: yet isn’t he obeyed, worshipped in his own way, more than all the crowned heads and queens in the world combined? High duchesses and innkeepers gather around the Scottish guy, Burns; it’s a strange feeling in each of them that they've never encountered someone like him—that, overall, this is the guy! Deep down, though they can't really express it these days, their secret hearts still hint that this rustic, with his black brows and bright, piercing eyes, and unique words that bring out laughter and tears, holds a dignity far beyond all others, incomparable with anyone else. Don't we feel this too? But if Dilettantism, Skepticism, Triviality, and that sad bunch could be completely removed from us— and, by God’s blessing, they will one day be; if faith in the illusions of things was entirely wiped out, replaced by a clear faith in the things, so that a person acted on that alone and saw everything else as nonexistent—what a fresh, vibrant feeling we would have towards this Burns!
Nay here in these pages, such as they are, have we not two mere Poets, if not deified, yet we may say beatified? Shakspeare and Dante are Saints of Poetry; really, if we will think of it, canonised, so that it is impiety to meddle with them. The unguided instinct of the world, working across all these perverse impediments, has arrived at such result. Dante and Shakspeare are a peculiar Two. They dwell apart, in a kind of royal solitude; none equal, none second to them: in the general feeling of the world, a certain transcendentalism, a glory as of complete perfection, invests these two. They are canonised, though no Pope or Cardinals took hand in doing it! Such, in spite of every perverting influence, in the most unheroic times, is still our indestructible reverence for heroism.—We will look a little at these Two, the Poet Dante and the Poet Shakspeare: what little it is permitted us to say here of the Hero as Poet will most fitly arrange itself in that fashion.
No, in these pages, as they are, we have not just two mere Poets; if they aren't deified, we could say they are beatified? Shakespeare and Dante are Saints of Poetry; truly, if we think about it, canonized, so getting involved with them is almost sacrilegious. The instinct of the world, navigating through all these strange obstacles, has come to this conclusion. Dante and Shakespeare are a unique pair. They exist in a kind of royal solitude; no one equals them, no one comes close: in the general sentiment of the world, there’s a certain transcendentalism, a glory of complete perfection that surrounds these two. They are canonized, even though no Pope or Cardinals were involved in the process! Such is our indestructible reverence for heroism, despite all the distorting influences in these unheroic times. — We will take a moment to examine these two, the Poet Dante and the Poet Shakespeare: whatever little we can say here about the Hero as Poet will best fit in that context.
Many volumes have been written by way of commentary on Dante and his Book; yet, on the whole, with no great result. His Biography is, as it were, irrecoverably lost for us. An unimportant, wandering, 319sorrowstricken man, not much note was taken of him while he lived; and the most of that has vanished, in the long space that now intervenes. It is five centuries since he ceased writing and living here. After all commentaries, the Book itself is mainly what we know of him. The Book;—and one might add that Portrait commonly attributed to Giotto, which, looking on it, you cannot help inclining to think genuine, whoever did it. To me it is a most touching face; perhaps of all faces that I know, the most so. Lonely there, painted as on vacancy, with the simple laurel wound round it; the deathless sorrow and pain, the known victory which is also deathless;—significant of the whole history of Dante! I think it is the mournfulest face that ever was painted from reality; an altogether tragic, heart-affecting face. There is in it, as foundation of it, the softness, tenderness, gentle affection as of a child; but all this is as if congealed into sharp contradiction, into abnegation, isolation, proud hopeless pain. A soft ethereal soul looking-out so stern, implacable, grim-trenchant, as from imprisonment of thick-ribbed ice! Withal it is a silent pain too, a silent scornful one: the lip is curled in a kind of godlike disdain of the thing that is eating-out his heart,—as if it were withal a mean insignificant thing, as if he whom it had power to torture and strangle were greater than it. The face of one wholly in protest, and life-long unsurrendering battle, against the world. Affection all converted into indignation: an implacable indignation; slow, equable, silent, like that of a god! The eye too, it looks-out as in a kind of surprise, a kind of inquiry, Why the world was of such a sort? This is Dante: so he looks, this ‘voice of ten silent centuries,’ and sings us ‘his mystic unfathomable song.’
Many books have been written commenting on Dante and his work, but overall, the impact has been minimal. His biography seems irretrievably lost to us. He was an unremarkable, wandering, sorrowful man, hardly noticed during his lifetime; most of what was known about him has faded over the centuries. It's been five hundred years since he stopped writing and living among us. After all the commentaries, the primary source of knowledge about him remains the Book itself. Also, one might mention the portrait often attributed to Giotto, which feels genuine no matter who created it. To me, it portrays an incredibly poignant face; perhaps the most touching face I know. There it is, painted as if in emptiness, with a simple laurel wrapped around it; capturing the eternal sorrow and pain, the recognized victory that is also timeless—symbolic of Dante's entire story! I believe it’s the most sorrowful face ever painted from real life; entirely tragic and deeply affecting. It has, at its core, the softness, tenderness, and gentle affection of a child, but all of that seems frozen into sharp contradiction, into renunciation, isolation, and proud, hopeless pain. A delicate, ethereal soul gazing out so sternly, uncompromising, grimly sharp, as if trapped in thick, icy confinement! Furthermore, it reflects a silent pain, a scornful silence: the lip curls with a kind of divine disdain for what is consuming his heart—as if what tormented him were trivial and unimportant, while the one it had the power to torture and choke was greater than it. The expression shows someone wholly in protest, engaged in a lifelong battle against the world. Affection transformed into indignation: an unyielding indignation; slow, steady, silent, like that of a god! The eye looks out with a kind of surprise, almost questioning why the world is as it is. This is Dante: this is how he looks, this ‘voice of ten silent centuries,’ singing us ‘his mystic unfathomable song.’
The little that we know of Dante’s Life corresponds well enough with this Portrait and this Book. He was born at Florence, in the upper class of society, in the year 1265. His education was the best then going; much school-divinity, Aristotelean logic, some Latin classics,—no inconsiderable insight into certain provinces of things: and Dante, with his earnest intelligent nature, we need not doubt, learned better than 320most all that was learnable. He has a clear cultivated understanding, and of great subtlety; the best fruit of education he had contrived to realise from these scholastics. He knows accurately and well what lies close to him; but, in such a time, without printed books or free intercourse, he could not know well what was distant: the small clear light, most luminous for what is near, breaks itself into singular chiaroscuro striking on what is far off. This was Dante’s learning from the schools. In life, he had gone through the usual destinies; been twice out campaigning as a soldier for the Florentine State, been on embassy; had in his thirty-fifth year, by natural gradation of talent and service, become one of the Chief Magistrates of Florence. He had met in boyhood a certain Beatrice Portinari, a beautiful little girl of his own age and rank, and grown-up thenceforth in partial sight of her, in some distant intercourse with her. All readers know his graceful affecting account of this; and then of their being parted; of her being wedded to another, and of her death soon after. She makes a great figure in Dante’s Poem; seems to have made a great figure in his life. Of all beings it might seem as if she, held apart from him, far apart at last in the dim Eternity, were the only one he had ever with his whole strength of affection loved. She died: Dante himself was wedded; but it seems not happily, far from happily. I fancy, the rigorous earnest man, with his keen excitabilities, was not altogether easy to make happy.
The little we know about Dante’s life lines up pretty well with this portrait and this book. He was born in Florence, into the upper class, in 1265. He received an excellent education for his time, which included a lot of theology, Aristotelian logic, and some Latin classics—he certainly gained a decent understanding of several subjects. Given Dante’s earnest and intelligent nature, it’s safe to say he absorbed much of what was available to learn. He had a clear, well-developed understanding and was very insightful; he made the most of his studies from the scholastics. He was well aware of what was right in front of him, but without printed books or open communication, he couldn’t have a good grasp of distant knowledge: the small, clear light he had illuminated nearby things but scattered when it came to the far-off. This was the extent of Dante’s academic learning. In life, he went through the normal experiences; he fought as a soldier for the Florentine State twice, served on diplomatic missions, and by the time he was thirty-five, through his talent and service, he became one of the Chief Magistrates of Florence. As a boy, he encountered Beatrice Portinari, a beautiful girl of his age and status, and he spent the rest of his life partially in her presence, with some distant interactions. Everyone knows his touching account of this, their separation, her marriage to someone else, and her death shortly after. She plays a significant role in Dante’s poem and seems to have had a huge impact on his life. Of all the people, it seems like she, separated from him and ultimately distant in the vastness of eternity, was the only one he ever truly loved with all his heart. She died, and Dante married, but it apparently wasn’t a happy union—far from it. I imagine that the intense, serious man, with his strong emotions, wasn’t easy to make happy.
We will not complain of Dante’s miseries: had all gone right with him as he wished it, he might have been Prior, Podestà, or whatsoever they call it, of Florence, well accepted among neighbours,—and the world had wanted one of the most notable words ever spoken or sung. Florence would have had another prosperous Lord Mayor; and the ten dumb centuries continued voiceless, and the ten other listening centuries (for there will be ten of them and more) had no Divina Commedia to hear! We will complain of nothing. A nobler destiny was appointed for this Dante; and he, struggling like a man led towards death and crucifixion, could not help fulfilling it. Give him the choice of his 321happiness! He knew not, more than we do, what was really happy, what was really miserable.
We won’t complain about Dante’s hardships: if everything had gone as he wanted, he might have become the Prior, Podestà, or whatever they call it, of Florence, well-respected by his neighbors—and the world would have missed out on some of the most remarkable words ever spoken or sung. Florence would have had another successful Lord Mayor; and the ten silent centuries would have remained mute, while the ten other centuries listening (for there will be more than ten) would have had no Divina Commedia to enjoy! We won’t complain about anything. A greater destiny was set for this Dante; and he, struggling like a man being led toward death and crucifixion, couldn’t help but fulfill it. Give him the choice of his 321happiness! He didn’t know any better than we do what was truly happy or truly miserable.
In Dante’s Priorship, the Guelf-Ghibelline, Bianchi-Neri, or some other confused disturbance rose to such a height, that Dante, whose party had seemed the stronger, was with his friends cast unexpectedly forth into banishment; doomed thenceforth to a life of woe and wandering. His property was all confiscated and more; he had the fiercest feeling that it was entirely unjust, nefarious in the sight of God and man. He tried what was in him to get reinstated; tried even by warlike surprisal, with arms in his hand: but it would not do; bad only had become worse. There is a record, I believe, still extant in the Florence Archives, dooming this Dante, wheresoever caught, to be burnt alive. Burnt alive; so it stands, they say: a very curious civic document. Another curious document, some considerable number of years later, is a Letter of Dante’s to the Florentine Magistrates, written in answer to a milder proposal of theirs, that he should return on condition of apologising and paying a fine. He answers, with fixed stern pride: “If I cannot return without calling myself guilty, I will never return, nunquam revertar.”
In Dante’s time as a leader, the conflict between the Guelfs and Ghibellines, Bianchi and Neri, or some other chaotic disturbance escalated so much that Dante, whose group had seemed stronger, along with his friends, was unexpectedly exiled; destined from then on to a life of suffering and wandering. His property was entirely seized, and he felt it was completely unjust, wrong in the eyes of both God and man. He did everything he could to be reinstated, even attempting to do so through armed confrontation: but it didn’t work; things only got worse. There’s a record, I believe, still available in the Florence Archives, sentencing Dante to be burned alive wherever he might be found. Burned alive; that’s what it says, they claim: a very intriguing civic document. Another intriguing document, many years later, is a letter from Dante to the Florentine magistrates, written in response to their gentler proposal that he could return if he apologized and paid a fine. He replies, with steadfast pride: “If I cannot return without declaring myself guilty, I will never return, nunquam revertar.”
For Dante there was now no home in this world. He wandered from patron to patron, from place to place; proving in his own bitter words, ‘How hard is the path, Come è duro calle.’ The wretched are not cheerful company. Dante, poor and banished, with his proud earnest nature, with his moody humours, was not a man to conciliate men. Petrarch reports of him that being at Can della Scala’s court, and blamed one day for his gloom and taciturnity, he answered in no courtier-like way. Della Scala stood among his courtiers, with mimes and buffoons (nebulones ac histriones) making him heartily merry; when turning to Dante, he said: “Is it not strange, now, that this poor fool should make himself so entertaining; while you, a wise man, sit there day after day, and have nothing to amuse us with at all?” Dante answered bitterly: “No, not strange; your Highness is to recollect the Proverb, Like to Like;”—given the amuser, the amusee 322must also be given! Such a man, with his proud silent ways, with his sarcasms and sorrows, was not made to succeed at court. By degrees, it came to be evident to him that he had no longer any resting-place, or hope of benefit, in this earth. The earthly world had cast him forth, to wander, wander; no living heart to love him now; for his sore miseries there was no solace here.
For Dante, there was no home in this world anymore. He moved from patron to patron, from place to place, proving with his own bitter words, ‘How hard is the path, Come è duro calle.’ The wretched are not cheerful company. Dante, poor and exiled, with his proud and earnest nature, and his moody temperament, was not someone who won people over. Petrarch reports that while at Can della Scala’s court, he was criticized one day for his gloominess and silence, and he responded in a way that was far from courtly. Della Scala stood among his courtiers, with mimes and jesters (nebulones ac histriones) making him laugh. He turned to Dante and said, “Isn’t it odd that this fool can entertain us so well, while you, a wise man, sit here day after day with nothing to amuse us?” Dante replied bitterly, “No, not odd; your Highness should remember the proverb, Like to Like”—for every entertainer, the entertained must also be found! Such a man, with his proud silence, sarcasm, and sorrows, wasn’t meant to thrive at court. Gradually, it became clear to him that he no longer had any place to rest or any hope of support in this world. The earthly realm had cast him out to wander, wander; no living heart to love him anymore; there was no comfort here for his deep miseries.
The deeper naturally would the Eternal World impress itself on him; that awful reality over which, after all, this Time-world, with its Florences and banishments, only flutters as an unreal shadow. Florence thou shalt never see: but Hell and Purgatory and Heaven thou shalt surely see! What is Florence, Can della Scala, and the World and Life altogether? Eternity: thither, of a truth, not elsewhither, art thou and all things bound! The great soul of Dante, homeless on earth, made its home more and more in that awful other world. Naturally his thoughts brooded on that, as on the one fact important for him. Bodied or bodiless, it is the one fact important for all men:—but to Dante, in that age, it was bodied in fixed certainty of scientific shape; he no more doubted of that Malebolge Pool, that it all lay there with its gloomy circles, with its alti guai, and that he himself should see it, than we doubt that we should see Constantinople if we went thither. Dante’s heart, long filled with this, brooding over it in speechless thought and awe, bursts forth at length into ‘mystic unfathomable song;’ and this his Divine Comedy, the most remarkable of all modern Books, is the result.
The deeper the Eternal World would naturally impress itself on him; that awful reality over which, after all, this Time-world, with its Florences and banishments, only flutters as an unreal shadow. Florence you shall never see: but Hell and Purgatory and Heaven you shall surely see! What is Florence, Can della Scala, and the World and Life altogether? Forever: truly, that is where you and all things are bound! Dante's great soul, homeless on earth, made its home more and more in that awful other world. Naturally, his thoughts dwelled on that as the one fact important for him. Bodied or bodiless, it is the one fact important for all men:—but for Dante, in that age, it was embodied in fixed certainty of scientific shape; he no longer doubted that Malebolge Pool, that it all lay there with its gloomy circles, with its alti guai, and that he himself would see it, than we doubt that we would see Constantinople if we went there. Dante's heart, long filled with this, brooding over it in speechless thought and awe, finally bursts forth into ‘mystic unfathomable song;’ and this, his Divine Comedy, the most remarkable of all modern Books, is the result.
It must have been a great solacement to Dante, and was, as we can see, a proud thought for him at times, That he, here in exile, could do this work; that no Florence, nor no man or men, could hinder him from doing it, or even much help him in doing it. He knew too, partly, that it was great; the greatest a man could do. ‘If thou follow thy star, Se tu segui tua stella,’—so could the Hero, in his forsakenness, in his extreme need, still say to himself: “Follow thou thy star, thou shalt not fail of a glorious haven!” The labour of writing, we find, and indeed could know 323otherwise, was great and painful for him; he says, This Book, ‘which has made me lean for many years.’ Ah yes, it was won, all of it, with pain and sore toil,—not in sport, but in grim earnest. His Book, as indeed most good Books are, has been written, in many senses, with his heart’s blood. It is his whole history, this Book. He died after finishing it; not yet very old, at the age of fifty-six;—broken-hearted rather, as is said. He lies buried in his death-city Ravenna: Hic claudor Dantes patriis extorris ab oris. The Florentines begged back his body, in a century after; the Ravenna people would not give it. “Here am I Dante laid, shut-out from my native shores.”
It must have been a great comfort to Dante, and at times, a proud thought for him, that he, here in exile, could do this work; that no Florence, nor any man or men, could stop him from doing it, or even help him much in doing it. He also knew, at least in part, that it was significant; the greatest a person could do. ‘If you follow your star, Se tu segui tua stella,’—so could the Hero, in his loneliness, in his dire need, still say to himself: “Follow your star, and you won’t fail to reach a glorious haven!” The work of writing, we find, and indeed could know 323 otherwise, was great and painful for him; he says, This Book, ‘which has made me lean for many years.’ Ah yes, it was earned, all of it, with pain and hard work,—not in fun, but in serious effort. His Book, as indeed most good Books are, has been written, in many senses, with his heart's blood. It is his entire history, this Book. He died after finishing it; not very old, at the age of fifty-six;—rather broken-hearted, as it is said. He is buried in his city of death, Ravenna: Hic claudor Dantes patriis extorris ab oris. The Florentines requested his body back a century later; the people of Ravenna would not give it up. “Here am I, Dante, laid to rest, shut out from my native shores.”
I said, Dante’s Poem was a Song: it is Tieck who calls it ‘a mystic unfathomable Song;’ and such is literally the character of it. Coleridge remarks very pertinently somewhere, that wherever you find a sentence musically worded, of true rhythm and melody in the words, there is something deep and good in the meaning too. For body and soul, word and idea, go strangely together here as everywhere. Song: we said before, it was the Heroic of Speech! All old Poems, Homer’s and the rest, are authentically Songs. I would say, in strictness, that all right Poems are; that whatsoever is not sung is properly no Poem, but a piece of Prose cramped into jingling lines,—to the great injury of the grammar, to the great grief of the reader, for most part! What we want to get at is the thought the man had, if he had any: why should he twist it into jingle, if he could speak it out plainly? It is only when the heart of him is rapt into true passion of melody, and the very tones of him, according to Coleridge’s remark, become musical by the greatness, depth and music of his thoughts, that we can give him right to rhyme and sing; that we call him a Poet, and listen to him as the Heroic of Speakers,—whose speech is Song. Pretenders to this are many; and to an earnest reader, I doubt, it is for most part a very melancholy, not to say an insupportable business, that of reading rhyme! Rhyme that had no inward necessity to be rhymed;—it ought to have told us plainly, without any jingle, what it was aiming at. I would advise all men 324who can speak their thought, not to sing it; to understand that, in a serious time, among serious men, there is no vocation in them for singing it. Precisely as we love the true song, and are charmed by it as by something divine, so shall we hate the false song, and account it a mere wooden noise, a thing hollow, superfluous, altogether an insincere and offensive thing.
I said that Dante’s poem was a song: it's Tieck who calls it ‘a mystic unfathomable song;’ and that really captures its essence. Coleridge points out somewhere that whenever you come across a musical sentence, with true rhythm and melody, there’s usually something meaningful and valuable in the content too. Here, as everywhere, body and soul, word and idea, are oddly connected. Song: as we said before, it was the Heroic of Speech! All old poems, including Homer’s and others, are genuinely songs. I would argue that, strictly speaking, all true poems are; that anything that isn’t sung is really not a poem at all, but just prose awkwardly forced into rhyme—significantly damaging the grammar and causing great frustration for the reader, in most cases! What we really want to grasp is the thought the author had, if they had any: why would they twist it into rhyme if they could express it clearly? It is only when their heart is truly caught up in a passion for melody, and their very tones, as Coleridge noted, become musical due to the greatness, depth, and music of their thoughts, that we grant them the right to rhyme and sing; that we call them a poet and listen to them as the Heroic of Speakers—whose speech is song. There are many who claim this title; and for a serious reader, I suspect it’s often a rather melancholy, if not unbearable, task to read rhyme! Rhyme that has no inner need to be rhymed—it should have communicated clearly, without any jingle, what it was trying to express. I would advise everyone 324 who can articulate their thoughts not to sing them; to recognize that, in a serious time, among serious people, there’s no place for singing it. Just as we love a true song and feel enchanted by it as if it were something divine, we will detest the false song, considering it a mere wooden noise, something hollow, unnecessary, entirely insincere and offensive.
I give Dante my highest praise when I say of his Divine Comedy that it is, in all senses, genuinely a Song. In the very sound of it there is a canto fermo; it proceeds as by a chant. The language, his simple terza rima, doubtless helped him in this. One reads along naturally with a sort of lilt. But I add, that it could not be otherwise; for the essence and material of the work are themselves rhythmic. Its depth, and rapt passion and sincerity, makes its musical;—go deep enough, there is music everywhere. A true inward symmetry, what one calls an architectural harmony, reigns in it, proportionates it all: architectural; which also partakes of the character of music. The three kingdoms, Inferno, Purgatorio, Paradiso, look-out on one another like compartments of a great edifice; a great supernatural world-cathedral, piled-up there, stern, solemn, awful; Dante’s World of Souls! It is, at bottom, the sincerest of all Poems; sincerity, here too, we find to be the measure of worth. It came deep out of the author’s heart of hearts; and it goes deep, and through long generations, into ours. The people of Verona, when they saw him on the streets, used to say, “Eccovi l’ uom ch’ è stato all’ Inferno, See, there is the man that was in Hell!” Ah, yes, he had been in Hell;—in Hell enough, in long severe sorrow and struggle; as the like of him is pretty sure to have been. Commedias that come-out divine are not accomplished otherwise. Thought, true labour of any kind, highest virtue itself, is it not the daughter of Pain? Born as out of the black whirlwind;—true effort, in fact, as of a captive struggling to free himself: that is Thought. In all ways we are ‘to become perfect through suffering.’—But, as I say, no work known to me is so elaborated as this of Dante’s. It has all been as if molten, in the hottest furnace of his soul. It had made him ‘lean’ 325for many years. Not the general whole only; every compartment of it is worked-out, with intense earnestness, into truth, into clear visuality. Each answers to the other; each fits in its place, like a marble stone accurately hewn and polished. It is the soul of Dante, and in this the soul of the middle ages, rendered forever rhythmically visible there. No light task; a right intense one: but a task which is done.
I give Dante my highest praise when I say that his Divine Comedy is truly a Song in every sense. The way it sounds has a canto fermo; it feels like a chant. His simple terza rima definitely helps with this. You read it naturally with a kind of lilt. But I must add that it couldn’t be any other way; the essence and material of the work are deeply rhythmic. Its depth, rapt passion, and sincerity make it musical; dive deep enough, and you'll find music everywhere. A true inner symmetry, what we call architectural harmony, reigns throughout; it’s architectural and also music-like. The three realms, Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso, look out at each other like sections of a grand building; a vast, supernatural world-cathedral, standing there, stern, solemn, and awe-inspiring; Dante’s World of Souls! At its core, it’s the sincerest of all Poems; sincerity is, once again, the measure of value. It came deep from the author's innermost heart and resonates deeply through generations into ours. The people of Verona would say when they saw him in the streets, “Eccovi l’ uom ch’ è stato all’ Inferno, Look, there’s the man who went to Hell!” Ah, yes, he had indeed been in Hell;—in Hell enough, suffering severely and struggling, as one like him is bound to have done. Comedies that turn out divine aren’t achieved any other way. Isn’t true thought and the true labor of any kind, the highest virtue itself, a product of Pain? Born from a black whirlwind;—true effort, in fact, as if a captive trying to break free: that’s what Thought is. In every way, we are supposed to become perfect through suffering.—But, as I said, no work I know of is as intricately crafted as this one by Dante. It has all been shaped as if melted in the hottest furnace of his soul. It made him ‘lean’ 325 for many years. Not just the overall piece; every part of it is worked out with intense seriousness into truth, into clear imagery. Each section corresponds to the others; each fits perfectly like a marble stone finely carved and polished. This is Dante’s soul, and in it, the soul of the middle ages is rendered rhythmically visible. It’s no light task; it’s incredibly intense: but it’s a task that is done.
Perhaps one would say, intensity, with the much that depends on it, is the prevailing character of Dante’s genius. Dante does not come before us as a large catholic mind; rather as a narrow and even sectarian mind: it is partly the fruit of his age and position, but partly too of his own nature. His greatness has, in all senses, concentered itself into fiery emphasis and depth. He is world-great not because he is world-wide, but because he is world-deep. Through all objects he pierces as it were down into the heart of Being. I know nothing so intense as Dante. Consider, for example, to begin with the outermost development of his intensity, consider how he paints. He has a great power of vision; seizes the very type of a thing; presents that and nothing more. You remember that first view he gets of the Hall of Dite: red pinnacle, redhot cone of iron glowing through the dim immensity of gloom;—so vivid, so distinct, visible at once and forever! It is as an emblem of the whole genius of Dante. There is a brevity, an abrupt precision in him: Tacitus is not briefer, more condensed; and then in Dante it seems a natural condensation, spontaneous to the man. One smiting word; and then there is silence, nothing more said. His silence is more eloquent than words. It is strange with what a sharp decisive grace he snatches the true likeness of a matter: cuts into the matter as with a pen of fire. Plutus, the blustering giant, collapses at Virgil’s rebuke; it is ‘as the sails sink, the mast being suddenly broken.’ Or that poor Brunetto Latini, with the cotto aspetto, ‘face baked,’ parched brown and lean; and the ‘fiery snow,’ that falls on them there, a ‘fiery snow without wind,’ slow, deliberate, never-ending! Or the lids of those Tombs; square sarcophaguses, in that silent dim-burning Hall, 326each with its Soul in torment; the lids laid open there; they are to be shut at the Day of Judgment, through Eternity. And how Farinata rises; and how Cavalcante falls—at hearing of his Son, and the past tense ‘fue’! The very movements in Dante have something brief; swift, decisive, almost military. It is of the inmost essence of his genius this sort of painting. The fiery, swift Italian nature of the man, so silent, passionate, with its quick abrupt movements, its silent ‘pale rages,’ speaks itself in these things.
Maybe one would say that intensity, with everything that relies on it, is the defining trait of Dante’s genius. Dante doesn’t present himself as a broad-minded thinker; instead, he comes across as quite narrow and even sectarian. This is partly a reflection of his time and circumstances, but also of his personal nature. His greatness is concentrated, in every sense, into fiery emphasis and depth. He is universally acknowledged as great not because he embraces the whole world, but because he delves deeply into it. He seems to pierce through all things to reach the essence of existence. I know nothing as intense as Dante. For instance, let’s start with the most outward expression of his intensity: consider how he portrays. He possesses a tremendous power of vision; he captures the very essence of a thing, presenting that and nothing else. Remember that initial glimpse he has of the Hall of Dite: a red pinnacle, a red-hot cone of iron glowing through the vastness of darkness—so vivid, so distinct, visible instantly and forever! It serves as an emblem of Dante's entire genius. There’s a brevity, a sudden precision in him: Tacitus is not more concise or condensed; and in Dante, it feels like a natural, spontaneous compression. One striking word; then there’s silence, nothing further is said. His silence is more expressive than words. It’s fascinating how with sharp, decisive grace he captures the true essence of a matter, cutting into it as if with a pen of fire. Plutus, the blustering giant, crumbles at Virgil’s reprimand; it’s like ‘the sails sink as the mast is suddenly broken.’ Or that unfortunate Brunetto Latini, with the cotto aspetto, ‘baked face,’ parched brown and lean; and the ‘fiery snow’ that falls on them there, a ‘fiery snow without wind,’ slow, deliberate, never-ending! Or the lids of those tombs; square sarcophagi, in that silent dimly-lit Hall, 326each with its soul in torment; the lids laid open there; they will be closed only on Judgment Day, for all eternity. And how Farinata rises; and how Cavalcante falls—upon hearing about his son, and the past tense ‘fue’! Even Dante’s movements have something brief, swift, decisive, almost military. This kind of painting is at the core of his genius. The passionate, fiery Italian nature of the man, so silent, intense, with its quick, abrupt actions, its quiet ‘pale rages,’ expresses itself in these works.
For though this of painting is one of the outermost developments of a man, it comes like all else from the essential faculty of him; it is physiognomical of the whole man. Find a man whose words paint you a likeness, you have found a man worth something; mark his manner of doing it, as very characteristic of him. In the first place, he could not have discerned the object at all, or seen the vital type of it, unless he had, what we may call, sympathised with it,—had sympathy in him to bestow on objects. He must have been sincere about it too; sincere and sympathetic: a man without worth cannot give you the likeness of any object; he dwells in vague outwardness, fallacy and trivial hearsay, about all objects. And indeed may we not say that intellect altogether expresses itself in this power of discerning what an object is? Whatsoever of faculty a man’s mind may have will come out here. Is it even of business, a matter to be done? The gifted man is he who sees the essential point, and leaves all the rest aside as surplusage: it is his faculty too, the man of business’s faculty, that he discern the true likeness, not the false superficial one, of the thing he has got to work in. And how much of morality is in the kind of insight we get of anything; ‘the eye seeing in all things what it brought with it the faculty of seeing’! To the mean eye all things are trivial, as certainly as to the jaundiced they are yellow. Raphael, the Painters tell us, is the best of all Portrait-painters withal. No most gifted eye can exhaust the significance of any object. In the commonest human face there lies more than Raphael will take-away with him.
For although painting is one of the most external expressions of a person, it still originates from his fundamental abilities; it reflects the whole person. If you find someone whose words create a vivid image for you, you've found someone of value; notice how uniquely he does it, as it's very characteristic of him. First of all, he couldn't have perceived the subject or seen its true essence unless he has what we might call sympathy for it — a capacity for empathy that he extends to objects. He must also be sincere about it; sincere and sympathetic: a person of little worth can't provide an accurate representation of any object. He remains lost in vague external appearances, misconceptions, and trivial gossip about everything. And indeed, can we not say that intellect is entirely expressed through this ability to understand what an object truly is? Whatever skills a person's mind possesses will emerge here. Is it even about business, a task at hand? A truly gifted person sees the essential point and dismisses everything else as unnecessary: it is also the skill of a businessperson to identify the true likeness, rather than a misleading superficial one, of the matter they need to deal with. And how much morality is reflected in the insight we gain about anything; ‘the eye perceives in everything what it is capable of seeing’! To a narrow-minded person, everything appears trivial, just as to someone with jaundice, everything looks yellow. Painters tell us that Raphael is the best of all portrait artists. No matter how gifted an eye might be, it cannot fully grasp the significance of any object. Even in the most ordinary human face, there is more depth than Raphael can capture.
Dante’s painting is not graphic only, brief, true, and 327of a vividness as of fire in dark night; taken on the wider scale, it is everyway noble, and the outcome of a great soul. Francesca and her Lover, what qualities in that! A thing woven as out of rainbows, on a ground of eternal black. A small flute-voice of infinite wail speaks there, into our very heart of hearts. A touch of womanhood in it too; della bella persona, che mi fu tolta; and how, even in the Pit of woe, it is a solace that he will never part from her! Saddest tragedy in these alti guai. And the racking winds, in that aer bruno, whirl them away again, to wail forever!—Strange to think: Dante was the friend of this poor Francesca’s father; Francesca herself may have sat upon the Poet’s knee, as a bright innocent little child. Infinite pity, yet also infinite rigour of law: it is so Nature is made; it is so Dante discerned that she was made. What a paltry notion is that of his Divine Comedy’s being a poor splenetic impotent terrestrial libel; putting those into Hell whom he could not be avenged-upon on earth! I suppose if ever pity, tender as a mother’s, was in the heart of any man, it was in Dante’s. But a man who does not know rigour cannot pity either. His very pity will be cowardly, egoistic,—sentimentality, or little better. I know not in the world an affection equal to that of Dante. It is a tenderness, a trembling, longing, pitying love: like the wail of Æolean harps, soft, soft; like a child’s young heart;—and then that stern, sore-saddened heart! These longings of his towards his Beatrice; their meeting together in the Paradiso; his gazing in her pure transfigured eyes, her that had been purified by death so long, separated from him so far:—one likens it to the song of angels; it is among the purest utterances of affection, perhaps the very purest, that ever came out of a human soul.
Dante’s painting isn't just visual; it’s brief, truthful, and has a vividness like fire in the dark night. When viewed on a larger scale, it’s undeniably noble and reflects a great soul. Francesca and her Lover—what depth in that! It’s crafted like something out of rainbows against a backdrop of eternal black. A gentle, infinite wail resonates within us, touching our very hearts. There’s also a hint of femininity; della bella persona, che mi fu tolta; and even in the depths of despair, it’s comforting that he will never be apart from her! The saddest tragedy exists in these alti guai. The stirring winds in that aer bruno swirl them away again, to lament forever!—It’s remarkable to think: Dante was friends with this poor Francesca’s father; she may have even sat on the Poet’s lap as a bright, innocent little girl. Infinite pity, yet also an unyielding sense of law: this is how Nature is designed; this is how Dante understood her nature. What a trivial idea it is to think that his Divine Comedy is just a lame, vengeful attack on those he couldn't get back at on earth! If ever there was a compassion tender as a mother’s heart, it was in Dante’s. But a man who doesn't understand rigor can't genuinely feel pity either. His pity would be cowardly, selfish—mere sentimentality, if that. I can't think of a love in this world that matches Dante's. It’s a tenderness, a trembling, yearning, empathic love: like the soft wail of Æolian harps, gentle, gentle; like a child’s innocent heart;—and then there’s that stern, sorrow-laden heart! His longings for Beatrice; their reunion in the Paradiso; his gaze into her pure, transfigured eyes, her whose soul had been purified by death long ago, separated from him by such distance:—it’s akin to the song of angels; it's among the purest expressions of love, perhaps the very purest, that has ever emerged from a human soul.
For the intense Dante is intense in all things; he has got into the essence of all. His intellectual insight as painter, on occasion too as reasoner, is but the result of all other sorts of intensity. Morally great, above all, we must call him; it is the beginning of all. His scorn, his grief are as transcendent as his love;—as indeed, what are they but the inverse or converse of his love? 328’A Dio spiacenti ed a’ nemici sui, Hateful to God and to the enemies of God:’ lofty scorn, unappeasable silent reprobation and aversion; ‘Non ragionam di lor, We will not speak of them, look only and pass.’ Or think of this; ‘They have not the hope to die, Non han speranza di morte.’ One day, it had risen sternly benign on the scathed heart of Dante, that he, wretched, never-resting, worn as he was, would full surely die; ‘that Destiny itself could not doom him not to die.’ Such words are in this man. For rigour, earnestness and depth, he is not to be paralleled in the modern world; to seek his parallel we must go into the Hebrew Bible, and live with the antique Prophets there.
For the intense Dante is intense in everything; he has tapped into the essence of all things. His sharp understanding as a painter, and sometimes as a thinker, stems from all kinds of intensity. We must call him morally great, above all; that's where it all starts. His scorn and grief are as powerful as his love; after all, aren’t they just the inverse or converse of his love? 328’A Dio spiacenti ed a’ nemici sui, Hateful to God and to the enemies of God:’ lofty disdain, unyielding silent condemnation and rejection; ‘Non ragionam di lor, We will not talk about them, just look and move on.’ Or consider this: ‘They have not the hope to die, Non han speranza di morte.’ One day, it struck Dante, in his harsh reality, that he, miserable and restless, as worn out as he was, would certainly die; ‘that Fate itself could not condemn him to not die.’ Such thoughts exist in this man. In terms of rigor, seriousness, and depth, he has no equal in the modern world; to find someone like him, we have to look to the Hebrew Bible and spend time with the ancient Prophets there.
I do not agree with much modern criticism, in greatly preferring the Inferno to the two other parts of the Divine Commedia. Such preference belongs, I imagine, to our general Byronism of taste, and is like to be a transient feeling. The Purgatorio and Paradiso, especially the former, one would almost say, is even more excellent than it. It is a noble thing that Purgatorio, ‘Mountain of Purification’; an emblem of the noblest conception of that age. If Sin is so fatal, and Hell is and must be so rigorous, awful, yet in Repentance too is man purified; Repentance is the grand Christian act. It is beautiful how Dante works it out. The tremolar dell’ onde that ‘trembling’ of the ocean-waves, under the first pure gleam of morning, dawning afar on the wandering Two, is as the type of an altered mood. Hope has now dawned; never-dying Hope, if in company still with heavy sorrow. The obscure sojourn of dæmons and reprobate is underfoot; a soft breathing of penitence mounts higher and higher, to the Throne of Mercy itself. “Pray for me,” the denizens of that Mount of Pain all say to him. “Tell my Giovanna to pray for me,” my daughter Giovanna; “I think her mother loves me no more!” They toil painfully up by that winding steep, ‘bent-down like corbels of a building,’ some of them,—crushed-together so ‘for the sin of pride’; yet nevertheless in years, in ages and æons, they shall have reached the top, which is Heaven’s gate, and by Mercy shall have been admitted in. The joy too of all, when one has prevailed; the whole Mountain 329shakes with joy, and a psalm of praise rises, when one soul has perfected repentance and got its sin and misery left behind! I call all this a noble embodiment of a true noble thought.
I don't agree with a lot of modern criticism; I greatly prefer the Inferno over the other two parts of the Divine Commedia. I think this preference is part of our general Byron-inspired taste and is likely to be a temporary feeling. The Purgatorio and Paradiso, especially the former, might even be better than it. Purgatorio, the ‘Mountain of Purification,’ is a wonderful idea, representing the best concept of that time. If sin is so deadly, and hell is as harsh and terrifying as it must be, then through repentance, humanity can be cleansed; repentance is the ultimate Christian act. It’s beautiful how Dante expresses this. The tremolar dell’ onde, or the ‘trembling’ of the ocean waves, under the first pure light of morning shining on the wandering two, symbolizes a shift in mood. Hope has now emerged; everlasting hope, even while still accompanied by deep sorrow. The dark dwelling of demons and the damned is behind them; a gentle wave of repentance rises higher and higher, reaching the Throne of Mercy itself. “Pray for me,” say all the souls of that Mountain of Pain. “Tell my Giovanna to pray for me,” my daughter Giovanna; “I think her mother loves me no more!” They struggle painfully up that winding slope, “bent down like corbels of a building,” some of them—crushed together like that “for the sin of pride”; yet in years, ages, and eons, they will reach the top, which is Heaven's gate, and through Mercy, they will be admitted. The joy of everyone when one succeeds; the whole mountain 329 shakes with happiness, and a hymn of praise rises when one soul has completed their repentance and left their sin and misery behind! I consider all this a noble embodiment of a truly great idea.
But indeed the Three compartments mutually support one another, are indispensable to one another. The Paradiso, a kind of inarticulate music to me, is the redeeming side of the Inferno; the Inferno without it were untrue. All three make-up the true Unseen World, as figured in the Christianity of the Middle Ages; a thing forever memorable, forever true in the essence of it, to all men. It was perhaps delineated in no human soul with such depth of veracity as in this of Dante’s; a man sent to sing it, to keep it long memorable. Very notable with what brief simplicity he passes out of the every-day reality, into the Invisible one; and in the second or third stanza, we find ourselves in the World of Spirits; and dwell there, as among things palpable, indubitable! To Dante they were so; the real world, as it is called, and its facts, was but the threshold to an infinitely higher Fact of a World. At bottom, the one was as preter-natural as the other. Has not each man a soul? He will not only be a spirit, but is one. To the earnest Dante it is all one visible Fact; he believes it, sees it; is the Poet of it in virtue of that. Sincerity, I say again, is the saving merit, now as always.
But truly, the three parts support each other and are essential to one another. The Paradiso, which feels like a kind of inexpressible music to me, represents the hopeful side of the Inferno; without it, the Inferno wouldn't be complete. Together, they form the genuine Unseen World, as depicted in medieval Christianity; something that remains significant and true in its essence for all people. It may have been expressed in no other soul with such deep honesty as in Dante's; a man sent to convey it and make it lasting. It's striking how simply he transitions from everyday reality into the Invisible world; by the second or third stanza, we find ourselves in the realm of Spirits, living there as if it's something tangible and unquestionable! To Dante, they were indeed real; what we call the real world and its facts were merely the doorway to a far greater reality. Ultimately, both were as preter-natural as the other. Doesn't every person have a soul? Not only will he become a spirit, but he already is one. For the earnest Dante, it's all one visible Truth; he believes it, sees it, and is the Poet of it because of that. I mention again that sincerity is the essential merit, now as ever.
Dante’s Hell, Purgatory, Paradise, are a symbol withal, an emblematic representation of his Belief about this Universe:—some Critic in a future age, like those Scandinavian ones the other day, who has ceased altogether to think as Dante did, may find this too all an ‘Allegory,’ perhaps an idle Allegory! It is a sublime embodiment, or sublimest, of the soul of Christianity. It expresses, as in huge worldwide architectural emblems, how the Christian Dante felt Good and Evil to be the two polar elements of this Creation, on which it all turns; that these two differ not by preferability of one to the other, but by incompatibility absolute and infinite; that the one is excellent and high as light and Heaven, the other hideous, black as Gehenna and the Pit of Hell! Everlasting Justice, yet with Penitence, 330with everlasting Pity,—all Christianism, as Dante and the Middle Ages had it, is emblemed here. Emblemed: and yet, as I urged the other day, with what entire truth of purpose; how unconscious of any embleming! Hell, Purgatory, Paradise: these things were not fashioned as emblems; was there, in our Modern European Mind, any thought at all of their being emblems? Were they not indubitable awful facts; the whole heart of man taking them for practically true, all Nature everywhere confirming them? So is it always in these things. Men do not believe an Allegory. The future Critic, whatever his new thought may be, who considers this of Dante to have been all got-up as an Allegory, will commit one sore mistake!—Paganism we recognised as a veracious expression of the earnest awe-struck feeling of man towards the Universe; veracious, true once, and still not without worth for us. But mark here the difference of Paganism and Christianism; one great difference. Paganism emblemed chiefly the Operations of Nature; the destinies, efforts, combinations, vicissitudes of things and men in this world; Christianism emblemed the Law of Human Duty, the Moral Law of Man. One was for the sensuous nature: a rude helpless utterance of the first Thought of men,—the chief recognised virtue, Courage, Superiority to Fear. The other was not for the sensuous nature, but for the moral. What a progress is here, if in that one respect only!—
Dante’s Hell, Purgatory, and Paradise symbolize his beliefs about the Universe. A critic in a future time, like those Scandinavian thinkers from recently, who no longer thinks as Dante did, might view all of this as mere ‘Allegory,’ perhaps even a trivial one! It represents the essence of Christianity in a profound way. It illustrates, much like massive architectural emblems, how Dante viewed Good and Evil as the two opposing forces of Creation, the foundation of everything. These two aren’t just different in value, but are absolutely and infinitely incompatible; one is as noble and elevated as light and Heaven, while the other is terrible, dark as Gehenna and the Pit of Hell! Everlasting Justice, yet accompanied by Penitence, along with everlasting Pity—this is the entirety of Christianity, as understood by Dante and the Middle Ages. It’s emblematic: and yet, as I mentioned before, with such genuine intention; completely unaware of any symbolic representation! Hell, Purgatory, Paradise: these things weren't created as symbols; was there, in our Modern European Mind, any thought that they were symbolic? Weren’t they undeniable, terrifying realities, with the whole of humanity regarding them as practically true, and all of Nature everywhere affirming them? It’s always like this with these matters. People don’t believe in an Allegory. The future critic, whatever new perspective he may have, who views Dante’s work as merely an Allegory, will make a significant mistake! We acknowledged Paganism as a true reflection of humanity's deep, awe-filled feelings towards the Universe; it was authentic, once true, and still holds value for us. But note the distinction between Paganism and Christianity; one major difference. Paganism mainly symbolized the workings of Nature; the fates, struggles, combinations, and changes of things and people in this world; Christianity symbolized the Law of Human Duty, the Moral Law of Man. One was focused on the sensory nature: a raw, helpless expression of the primary Thoughts of men—the recognized virtue being Courage, superiority over Fear. The other was aimed not at the sensory nature, but at the moral. What progress this represents, even if just in that one aspect!
And so in this Dante, as we said, had ten silent centuries, in a very strange way, found a voice. The Divina Commedia is of Dante’s writing; yet in truth it belongs to ten Christian centuries, only the finishing of it is Dante’s. So always. The craftsman there, the smith with that metal of his, with these tools, with these cunning methods,—how little of all he does is properly his work! All past inventive men work there with him;—as indeed with all of us, in all things. Dante is the spokesman of the Middle Ages; the Thought they lived by stands here in everlasting music. These sublime ideas of his, terrible and beautiful, are the fruit of the Christian Meditation of all the good men 331who had gone before him. Precious they; but also is not he precious? Much, had not he spoken, would have been dumb; not dead, yet living voiceless.
And so in this, Dante, as we said, had ten silent centuries, in a very strange way, found a voice. The Divine Comedy is written by Dante; yet in truth it belongs to ten Christian centuries, only the finishing touches are Dante’s. So it goes. The craftsman there, the smith with his metal, with these tools, with these clever methods—how little of what he does is truly his work! All the inventive minds from the past work there alongside him;—just like all of us, in everything. Dante is the voice of the Middle Ages; the ideas they lived by echo here in timeless music. These sublime ideas of his, both terrifying and beautiful, are the result of the Christian reflections of all the good men 331 who came before him. They are precious; but isn’t he precious too? Much of what would have been left unsaid without him. Not dead, yet living without a voice.
On the whole, is it not an utterance, this Mystic Song, at once of one of the greatest human souls, and of the highest thing that Europe had hitherto realised for itself? Christianism, as Dante sings it, is another than Paganism in the rude Norse mind; another than ‘Bastard Christianism’ half-articulately spoken in the Arab Desert seven-hundred years before!—The noblest idea made real hitherto among men, is sung, and emblemed-forth abidingly, by one of the noblest men. In the one sense and in the other, are we not right glad to possess it? As I calculate, it may last yet for long thousands of years. For the thing that is uttered from the inmost parts of a man’s soul, differs altogether from what is uttered by the outer part. The outer is of the day, under the empire of mode; the outer passes away, in swift endless changes; the inmost is the same yesterday, today and forever. True souls, in all generations of the world, who look on this Dante, will find a brotherhood in him; the deep sincerity of his thoughts, his woes and hopes, will speak likewise to their sincerity; they will feel that this Dante too was a brother. Napoleon in Saint-Helena is charmed with the genial veracity of old Homer. The oldest Hebrew Prophet, under a vesture the most diverse from ours, does yet, because he speaks from the heart of man, speak to all men’s hearts. It is the one sole secret of continuing long memorable. Dante, for depth of sincerity, is like an antique Prophet too; his words, like theirs, come from his very heart. One need not wonder if it were predicted that his Poem might be the most enduring thing our Europe has yet made; for nothing so endures as a truly spoken word. All cathedrals, pontificalities, brass and stone, and outer arrangement never so lasting, are brief in comparison to an unfathomable heart-song like this: one feels as if it might survive, still of importance to men, when these had all sunk into new irrecognisable combinations, and had ceased individually to be. Europe has made much; great cities, great empires, encyclopædias, 332creeds, bodies of opinion and practice: but it has made little of the class of Dante’s Thought. Homer yet is, veritably present face to face with every open soul of us; and Greece, where is it? Desolate for thousands of years; away, vanished; a bewildered heap of stones and rubbish, the life and existence of it all gone. Like a dream; like the dust of King Agamemnon! Greece was; Greece, except in the words it spoke, is not.
Overall, isn't this Mystic Song a declaration, capturing both one of the greatest human spirits and the highest achievement that Europe had realized up to that point? Christianity, as Dante expresses it, differs greatly from the Pagan ideas in the rugged Norse mind; it’s also different from the ‘Bastard Christianity’ crudely articulated in the Arab Desert seven hundred years earlier!—The noblest idea made real among humans is expressed and symbolically represented enduringly by one of the noblest individuals. In both senses, aren’t we glad to have it? I believe it could last for many thousands of years to come. What comes from the deepest parts of a person's soul is completely different from what emerges from the surface. The outer expression is temporary, shaped by trends; the outer fades away with rapid and endless changes, while the innermost remains the same yesterday, today, and forever. Genuine souls, across all generations of the world, who look upon Dante will find a connection with him; the profound sincerity of his thoughts, his sorrows and hopes, will resonate with their own sincerity; they will feel that Dante was indeed a brother. Napoleon in Saint Helena is captivated by the genuine truth of old Homer. The oldest Hebrew Prophet, dressed in a manner vastly different from our own, still speaks to all human hearts because he speaks from the human heart. This is the single secret of enduring significance. Dante, with his depth of sincerity, resembles an ancient Prophet too; his words, like theirs, flow from his very heart. It’s not surprising that it was foretold his Poem might be the most lasting creation from Europe yet; for nothing endures like a genuinely spoken word. All cathedrals, grand titles, brass and stone, and even the most lasting external structures are brief compared to a profound heart-song like this: it feels like it could remain relevant to people even when these structures have crumbled into new unrecognizable forms and have ceased to exist individually. Europe has achieved much; great cities, vast empires, encyclopedias, 332belief systems, bodies of opinion and practice: but it has created little of the caliber of Dante’s Thought. Homer still is, genuinely present face to face with each of our open souls; yet where is Greece? Desolate for thousands of years; gone, vanished; a disoriented pile of stones and rubble, with its life and essence completely lost. Like a dream; like the dust of King Agamemnon! Greece existed; Greece, except in the words she spoke, does not exist anymore.
The uses of this Dante? We will not say much about his ‘uses.’ A human soul who has once got into that primal element of Song, and sung-forth fitly somewhat therefrom, has worked in the depths of our existence; feeding through long times the life-roots of all excellent human things whatsoever,—in a way that ‘utilities’ will not succeed well in calculating! We will not estimate the Sun by the quantity of gas-light it saves us; Dante shall be invaluable, or of no value. One remark I may make: the contrast in this respect between the Hero-Poet and the Hero-Prophet. In a hundred years, Mahomet, as we saw, had his Arabians at Grenada and at Delhi; Dante’s Italians seem to be yet very much where they were. Shall we say, then, Dante’s effect on the world was small in comparison? Not so: his arena is far more restricted: but also it is far nobler, clearer;—perhaps not less but more important. Mahomet speaks to great masses of men, in the coarse dialect adapted to such; a dialect filled with inconsistencies, crudities, follies: on the great masses alone can he act, and there with good and with evil strangely blended. Dante speaks to the noble, the pure and great, in all times and places. Neither does he grow obsolete, as the other does. Dante burns as a pure star, fixed there in the firmament, at which the great and the high of all ages kindle themselves: he is the possession of all the chosen of the world for uncounted time. Dante, one calculates, may long survive Mahomet. In this way the balance may be made straight again.
The uses of Dante? We won’t say much about his 'uses.' A human soul that has entered that primal element of Song and expressed something fitting from it has worked deep within our existence; nourishing over time the life-roots of all excellent human things— in a way that 'utilities' will never be able to accurately measure! We wouldn’t assess the Sun by the amount of gas-light it saves us; Dante is either priceless or worthless. One thing I should mention: the difference here between the Hero-Poet and the Hero-Prophet. Within a hundred years, Mohammad, as we saw, had his Arabs in Granada and Delhi; Dante’s Italians seem to still be very much where they were. So, should we say that Dante’s impact on the world was minimal by comparison? Not really: his scope is much more limited, but also much nobler and clearer; perhaps not less but even more significant. Mohammad speaks to large groups of people in a rough dialect suited for that; a dialect filled with inconsistencies, crudities, and foolishness: he can only influence the masses and there it’s a blend of good and evil. Dante speaks to the noble, the pure, and the great across all times and places. And unlike the other, he doesn’t become outdated. Dante shines like a pure star fixed in the sky, inspiring the great and the high of every age: he is the treasure of all the chosen ones of the world for countless ages. It’s believed that Dante may outlast Mohammad. This way, the scales can be balanced again.
But, at any rate, it is not by what is called their effect on the world by what we can judge of their effect there, that a man and his work are measured. Effect? 333Influence? Utility? Let a man do his work; the fruit of it is the care of Another than he. It will grow its own fruit; and whether embodied in Caliph Thrones and Arabian Conquests, so that it ‘fills all Morning and Evening Newspapers,’ and all Histories, which are a kind of distilled Newspapers; or not embodied so at all;—what matters that? That is not the real fruit of it! The Arabian Caliph, in so far only as he did something, was something. If the great Cause of Man, and Man’s work in God’s Earth, got no furtherance from the Arabian Caliph, then no matter how many scimetars he drew, how many gold piasters pocketed, and what uproar and blaring he made in this world—he was but a loud-sounding inanity and futility; at bottom, he was not at all. Let us honour the great empire of Silence, once more! The boundless treasury which we do not jingle in our pockets, or count up and present before men! It is perhaps, of all things, the usefulest for each of us to do, in these loud times.——
But anyway, a man's worth and his work aren't measured by their so-called effects on the world, based on what we can see. Effect? Influence? Utility? Let a man just do his work; the outcome is in the hands of someone else. It will produce its own results, and whether it leads to Caliph thrones and Arabian conquests, filling up all the morning and evening newspapers, and all the histories, which are kind of like condensed newspapers; or if it doesn't manifest that way at all—what does it matter? That's not the real outcome! The Arabian Caliph, only insofar as he accomplished something, had any significance. If the greater Cause of Humanity and Man’s work on God’s Earth didn’t benefit from the Arabian Caliph, then no matter how many scimitars he drew, how many gold piasters he pocketed, or how much noise and chaos he created in this world—he was just a meaningless distraction; at his core, he was nothing. Let’s celebrate the vast empire of Silence once again! The limitless treasure that we do not rattle in our pockets or count out to show others! It might be the most valuable thing for each of us to focus on in these noisy times.——
As Dante, the Italian man, was sent into our world to embody musically the Religion of the Middle Ages, the Religion of our Modern Europe, its Inner Life; so Shakspeare, we may say, embodies for us the Outer Life of our Europe as developed then, its chivalries, courtesies, humours, ambitions, what practical way of thinking, acting, looking at the world, men then had. As in Homer we may still construe Old Greece; so in Shakspeare and Dante, after thousands of years, what our modern Europe was, in Faith and in Practice, will still be legible. Dante has given us the Faith or soul; Shakspeare, in a not less noble way, has given us the Practice or body. This latter also we were to have: a man was sent for it, the man Shakspeare. Just when that chivalry way of life had reached its last finish, and was on the point of breaking down into slow or swift dissolution, as we now see it everywhere, this other sovereign Poet, with his seeing eye, with his perennial singing voice, was sent to take note of it, to give long-enduring record of it. Two fit men: Dante, deep, fierce as the central fire of the world; Shakspeare, wide, placid, far-seeing, as the Sun, the upper light of the 334world. Italy produced the one world-voice; we English had the honour of producing the other.
As Dante, the Italian, was brought into our world to express musically the Religion of the Middle Ages, the Religion of our Modern Europe, its Inner Life; in the same way, we can say that Shakespeare embodies for us the Outer Life of Europe as it developed back then, its chivalries, courtesies, moods, ambitions, and the practical ways of thinking, acting, and viewing the world that people had at that time. Just as we can still interpret Ancient Greece through Homer, we can also read what our modern Europe was like in terms of Faith and Practice through Shakespeare and Dante, even after thousands of years. Dante has given us the Faith or soul; Shakespeare, in an equally noble manner, has given us the Practice or body. This latter was also necessary; a man was sent for it, the man Shakespeare. Just when that chivalric way of life had reached its final form and was about to break down into slow or quick dissolution, as we now see everywhere, this other great Poet, with his perceptive eye and timeless singing voice, was sent to observe it and provide a lasting record of it. Two fitting men: Dante, deep and fierce like the world's central fire; Shakespeare, broad, calm, and far-sighted, like the Sun, the upper light of the 334 world. Italy produced the one world-voice; we English had the honor of producing the other.
Curious enough how, as it were by mere accident, this man came to us. I think always, so great, quiet, complete and self-sufficing is this Shakspeare, had the Warwickshire Squire not prosecuted him for deer-stealing, we had perhaps never heard of him as a Poet! The woods and skies, the rustic Life of Man in Stratford there, had been enough for this man! But indeed that strange outbudding of our whole English Existence, which we call the Elizabethan Era, did not it too come as of its own accord? The ‘Tree Igdrasil’ buds and withers by its own laws,—too deep for our scanning. Yet it does bud and wither, and every bough and leaf of it is there, by fixed eternal laws; not a Sir Thomas Lucy but comes at the hour fit for him. Curious, I say, and not sufficiently considered: how everything does coöperate with all; not a leaf rotting on the highway but is indissoluble portion of solar and stellar systems; no thought, word or act of man but has sprung withal out of all men, and works sooner or later, recognisably or irrecognisably, on all men! It is all a Tree: circulation of sap and influences, mutual communication of every minutest leaf with the lowest talon of a root, with every other greatest and minutest portion of the whole. The Tree Igdrasil, that has its roots down in the Kingdoms of Hela and Death, and whose boughs overspread the highest Heaven!—
It's interesting how, almost by chance, this man came to us. I always think that great, calm, complete, and self-sufficient is this Shakespeare; had the Warwickshire Squire not pursued him for deer-stealing, we might never have heard of him as a poet! The woods and skies, the simple life of man in Stratford would have been enough for him! But indeed, that strange emergence of our entire English existence, which we call the Elizabethan Era, didn't it also come about spontaneously? The 'Tree Igdrasil' buds and withers by its own laws—too deep for us to fully understand. Yet it does bud and wither, and every branch and leaf is there, governed by fixed eternal laws; not a Sir Thomas Lucy comes but at the right moment for him. It’s curious, I say, and not given enough thought: how everything cooperates with everything else; not a single leaf decaying on the road that isn’t an essential part of solar and stellar systems; no thought, word, or action of man that hasn’t emerged from all men and eventually influences all men, either visibly or invisibly! It’s all one Tree: circulation of sap and influences, mutual communication of every tiny leaf with the lowest root, with every other largest and smallest part of the whole. The Tree Igdrasil, with its roots deep in the realms of Hela and Death, and whose branches reach across the highest Heaven!
In some sense it may be said that this glorious Elizabethan Era with its Shakspeare, as the outcome and flowerage of all which had preceded it, is itself attributable to the Catholicism of the Middle Ages. The Christian Faith, which was the theme of Dante’s Song, had produced this Practical Life which Shakspeare was to sing. For Religion then, as it now and always is, was the soul of Practice; the primary vital fact in men’s life. And remark here, as rather curious, that Middle-Age Catholicism was abolished, so far as Acts of Parliament could abolish it, before Shakspeare, the noblest product of it, made his appearance. He did make his appearance nevertheless. Nature at her own time, with Catholicism or what else might be necessary, sent him 335forth; taking small thought of Acts of Parliament. King-Henrys, Queen-Elizabeths go their way; and Nature too goes hers. Acts of Parliament, on the whole, are small, notwithstanding the noise they make. What Act of Parliament, debate at St. Stephen’s, on the hustings or elsewhere, was it that brought this Shakspeare into being? No dining at Freemasons’ Tavern, opening subscription-lists, selling of shares, and infinite other jangling and true or false endeavouring! This Elizabethan Era, and all its nobleness and blessedness, came without proclamation, preparation of ours. Priceless Shakspeare was the free gift of Nature; given altogether silently;—received altogether silently, as if it had been a thing of little account. And yet, very literally, it is a priceless thing. One should look at that side of matters too.
In a way, you could say that this incredible Elizabethan Era, with Shakespeare at its center, is the result of everything that came before it, and it’s linked to the Catholicism of the Middle Ages. The Christian Faith, which inspired Dante’s work, laid the groundwork for the practical life that Shakespeare would celebrate. Back then, just as it is now and always has been, religion was the heart of how people lived; it was the key factor in their lives. It’s interesting to note that Middle-Age Catholicism was abolished, at least in terms of Acts of Parliament, before Shakespeare, one of its greatest products, came onto the scene. Still, he did arrive. Nature, in her own time, regardless of the need for Catholicism or anything else, brought him forth, without worrying about Acts of Parliament. Kings, queens, and Parliament may follow their own paths, but Nature follows hers. Overall, Acts of Parliament are minor players, despite the commotion they create. What law or debate in Parliament was responsible for the emergence of Shakespeare? No amount of gatherings at Freemasons’ Tavern, opening subscription lists, selling shares, or endless chatter or efforts, true or false, could do that! This Elizabethan Era, along with all its greatness and blessings, came without any announcements or our preparations. Priceless Shakespeare was a gift from Nature; given quietly and received quietly, as if it was something of little importance. Yet, in reality, it is incredibly valuable. That's a perspective worth considering.
Of this Shakspeare of ours, perhaps the opinion one sometimes hears a little idolatrously expressed is, in fact, the right one; I think the best judgment not of this country only, but of Europe at large, is slowly pointing to the conclusion, That Shakspeare is the chief of all Poets hitherto; the greatest intellect who, in our recorded world, has left record of himself in the way of Literature. On the whole, I know not such a power of vision, such a faculty of thought, if we take all the characters of it, in any other man. Such a calmness of depth; placid joyous strength; all things imaged in that great soul of his so true and clear, as in a tranquil unfathomable sea! It has been said, that in the constructing of Shakspeare’s Dramas there is, apart from all other ‘faculties’ as they are called, an understanding manifested, equal to that in Bacon’s Novum Organum. That is true; and it is not a truth that strikes every one. It would become more apparent if we tried, any of us for himself, how, out of Shakspeare’s dramatic materials, we could fashion such a result! The built house seems all so fit,—everyway as it should be, as if it came there by its own law and the nature of things,—we forget the rude disorderly quarry it was shaped from. The very perfection of the house, as if Nature herself had made it, hides the builder’s merit. Perfect, more perfect than any other 336man, we may call Shakspeare in this: he discerns, knows as by instinct, what condition he works under, what his materials are, what his own force and its relation to them is. It is not a transitory glance of insight that will suffice; it is deliberate illumination of the whole matter; it is a calmly seeing eye; a great intellect, in short. How a man, of some wide thing that he has witnessed, will construct a narrative, what kind of picture and delineation he will give of it,—is the best measure you could get of what intellect is in the man. Which circumstance is vital and shall stand prominent; which unessential, fit to be suppressed; where is the true beginning, the true sequence and ending? To find out this, you task the whole force of insight that is in the man. He must understand the thing; according to the depth of his understanding, will the fitness of his answer be. You will try him so. Does like join itself to like; does the spirit of method stir in that confusion, so that its embroilment becomes order? Can the man say, Fiat lux, Let there be light; and out of chaos make a world? Precisely as there is light in himself, will he accomplish this.
Of our Shakespeare, the opinion that you sometimes hear expressed almost worshipfully is, in fact, probably the right one; I believe the best judgment not just of this country, but of Europe as a whole, is gradually leading to the conclusion that Shakespeare is the greatest of all poets to date; the most brilliant intellect who, in our recorded history, has left a mark in the realm of literature. Overall, I don’t know of anyone else who possesses such extraordinary vision and thought. His depth is so calm; he has a peaceful, joyful strength; everything reflected in that great soul of his is so true and clear, like a serene, unfathomable sea! It has been said that in the construction of Shakespeare’s dramas, there is a level of understanding, aside from other so-called ‘faculties’, that is equal to what is found in Bacon’s Novum Organum. That is true, and it’s a truth that doesn’t strike everyone immediately. It would become clearer if any of us tried for ourselves to see how we could shape such a result from Shakespeare’s dramatic materials! The finished work seems so perfect—everything appears just as it should be, as if it naturally belongs there—we forget the rough, chaotic raw materials it was made from. The very perfection of the work, as if Nature herself created it, hides the builder’s skill. We could call Shakespeare perfect, more perfect than anyone else, in this: he instinctively understands the conditions he is working under, what his materials are, and the relationship between his own strength and those materials. It’s not just a passing insight that suffices; it’s a deliberate illumination of the entire matter; it’s a calmly seeing eye; in short, a great intellect. How a person constructs a narrative from some larger experience they have witnessed, and what kind of picture and depiction they provide—is the best measure of their intellect. Which aspects are critical and should stand out; which are unimportant and can be left out; where is the true beginning, the true sequence, and the ending? To discover this, you draw upon the full force of insight within the person. They must understand the matter; the depth of their understanding will determine how well their response fits. You will test them in this way. Does like attract like; does a sense of order emerge from chaos, so that disorder becomes organized? Can the individual declare, Fiat lux, Let there be light; and create a world from chaos? Just as there is light within him, so will he achieve this.
Or indeed we may say again, it is in what I called Portrait-painting, delineating of men and things, especially of men, that Shakspeare is great. All the greatness of the man comes out decisively here. It is unexampled, I think, that calm creative perspicacity of Shakspeare. The thing he looks at reveals not this or that face of it, but its inmost heart, and generic secret: it dissolves itself as in light before him, so that he discerns the perfect structure of it. Creative, we said: poetic creation, what is this too but seeing the thing sufficiently? The word that will describe the thing, follows of itself from such clear intense sight of the thing. And is not Shakspeare’s morality, his valour, candour, tolerance, truthfulness; his whole victorious strength and greatness, which can triumph over such obstructions, visible there too? Great as the world! No twisted, poor convex-concave mirror, reflecting all objects with its own convexities and concavities; a perfectly level mirror;—that is to say withal, if we will 337understand it, a man justly related to all things and men, a good man. It is truly a lordly spectacle how this great soul takes-in all kinds of men and objects, a Falstaff, an Othello, a Juliet, a Coriolanus; sets them all forth to us in their round completeness; loving, just, the equal brother of all. Novum Organum, and all the intellect you will find in Bacon, is of a quite secondary order; earthly, material, poor in comparison with this. Among modern men, one finds, in strictness, almost nothing of the same rank. Goethe alone, since the days of Shakspeare, reminds me of it. Of him too you say that he saw the object; you may say what he himself says of Shakspeare: ‘His characters are like watches with dial-plates of transparent crystal; they show you the hour like others, and the inward mechanism also is all visible.’
Or we might say again, it’s in what I referred to as Portrait-painting, portraying people and things, especially people, that Shakespeare excels. All the greatness of the man shines through decisively here. I think it’s unprecedented, that calm, creative insight of Shakespeare. What he examines reveals not just one side of it, but its deepest essence and underlying truth: it melts away in the light before him, so he can see its complete structure. Creative, as we said: poetic creation—what is this if not seeing the thing thoroughly? The word that describes the thing naturally follows from such clear, intense observation of it. And isn’t Shakespeare’s morality—his courage, honesty, tolerance, and truthfulness; his whole victorious strength and greatness, which can overcome such obstacles—visible there too? Great as the world! No twisted, flawed convex-concave mirror reflecting all objects with its own distortions; a perfectly level mirror;—that is, if we choose to understand it, a man rightly connected to all things and people, a good man. It’s truly a majestic sight how this great soul embraces all kinds of people and things—a Falstaff, an Othello, a Juliet, a Coriolanus; he presents them to us in their full completeness; loving, just, the equal brother of all. Novum Organum, and all the intellect you’ll find in Bacon, are of a much lower order; earthly, material, and insufficient in comparison to this. Among modern people, there’s really nothing of the same caliber. Goethe alone, since Shakespeare’s time, reminds me of it. You would say of him too that he saw the object; you can echo what he himself says about Shakespeare: ‘His characters are like watches with transparent crystal faces; they tell you the time like others, and the inner workings are also fully visible.’
The seeing eye! It is this that discloses the inner harmony of things; what Nature meant, what musical idea Nature has wrapped-up in these often rough embodiments. Something she did mean. To the seeing eye that something were discernible. Are they base, miserable things? You can laugh over them, you can weep over them; you can in some way or other genially relate yourself to them;—you can, at lowest, hold your peace about them, turn away your own and others’ face from them, till the hour come for practically exterminating and extinguishing them! At bottom, it is the Poet’s first gift, as it is all men’s, that he have intellect enough. He will be a Poet if he have: a Poet in word; or failing that, perhaps still better, a Poet in act. Whether he write at all; and if so, whether in prose or in verse, will depend on accidents: who knows on what extremely trivial accidents,—perhaps on his having had a singing-master, on his being taught to sing in his boyhood! But the faculty which enables him to discern the inner heart of things, and the harmony that dwells there (for whatsoever exists has a harmony in the heart of it, or it would not hold together and exist), is not the result of habits or accidents, but the gift of Nature herself; the primary outfit for a Heroic Man in what sort soever. To the Poet, as to every other, we say 338first of all, See. If you cannot do that, it is of no use to keep stringing rhymes together, jingling sensibilities against each other, and name yourself a Poet; there is no hope for you. If you can, there is, in prose or verse, in action or speculation, all manner of hope. The crabbed old Schoolmaster used to ask, when they brought him a new pupil, “But are ye sure he’s not a dunce?” Why, really one might ask the same thing in regard to every man proposed for whatsoever function; and consider it as the one inquiry needful: Are ye sure he’s not a dunce? There is, in this world, no other entirely fatal person.
The seeing eye! It reveals the inner harmony of things; it shows what Nature intended and the musical idea that Nature has hidden in these often rough forms. There is something she did mean. To the seeing eye, that something can be recognized. Are they lowly, miserable things? You can laugh at them, you can cry over them; you can somehow connect with them in a friendly way;—you can, at the very least, ignore them, turning your own face and others’ away from them, until the moment comes for practically destroying and eliminating them! Ultimately, it is the Poet’s first gift, as it is for everyone, to have enough intellect. He will be a Poet if he has it: a Poet in words; or, if not, perhaps even better, a Poet in actions. Whether he writes at all, and if so, whether in prose or verse, depends on circumstances: who knows on what extremely trivial circumstances—perhaps on having had a singing teacher, on being taught to sing in his childhood! But the ability to find the inner essence of things and the harmony that exists there (for everything that exists has a harmony at its core, or it wouldn’t hold together and exist) is not the result of habits or chance, but a gift from Nature herself; the essential equipment for any Heroic Man, in any form. To the Poet, as to everyone else, we say first of all, See. If you can’t do that, it’s pointless to keep stringing rhymes together, clashing sensibilities, and calling yourself a Poet; there is no hope for you. If you can, then there is, in prose or verse, in action or thought, all kinds of hope. The grumpy old Schoolmaster used to ask, when they brought him a new pupil, “But are you sure he’s not a dunce?” Well, honestly, one might ask the same thing about every person proposed for any role; and consider it as the one important question: Are you sure he’s not a dunce? There is, in this world, no other truly fatal type of person.
For, in fact, I say the degree of vision that dwells in a man is a correct measure of the man. If called to define Shakspeare’s faculty, I should say superiority of Intellect, and think I had included all under that. What indeed are faculties? We talk of faculties as if they were distinct, things separable; as if a man had intellect, imagination, fancy, &c, as he has hands, feet and arms. That is a capital error. Then again, we hear of a man’s ‘intellectual nature,’ and of his ‘moral nature,’ as if these again were divisible, and existed apart. Necessities of language do perhaps prescribe such forms of utterance; we must speak, I am aware, in that way, if we are to speak at all. But words ought not to harden into things for us. It seems to me, our apprehension of this matter is, for the most part, radically falsified thereby. We ought to know withal, and to keep for ever in mind, that these divisions are at bottom but names; that man’s spiritual nature, the vital Force which dwells in him, is essentially one and indivisible; that what we call imagination, fancy, understanding, and so forth, are but different figures of the same Power of Insight, all indissolubly connected with each other, physiognomically related; that if we knew one of them, we might know all of them. Morality itself, what we call the moral quality of a man, what is this but another side of the one vital Force whereby he is and works? All that a man does is physiognomical of him. You may see how a man would fight, by the way in which he sings; his courage, or want of courage, is visible in the word he utters, in the opinion 339he has formed, no less than in the stroke he strikes. He is one; and preaches the same Self abroad in all these ways.
Because, in truth, I believe the level of vision a person possesses is a true measure of who they are. If asked to define Shakespeare’s talent, I would say it’s his superior intellect, and I would think that covers everything. What are faculties, anyway? We discuss faculties as if they’re separate, distinct things; as if a person has intellect, imagination, creativity, etc., like they have hands, feet, and arms. That’s a major mistake. Then we hear about a person’s “intellectual nature” and “moral nature,” as if these can be divided and exist independently. Necessities of language may require such phrasing; I know we must speak this way if we are to communicate at all. But words shouldn’t become rigid concepts for us. It seems to me that our understanding of this issue is largely distorted as a result. We should recognize and always remember that these divisions are really just names; that a person’s spiritual nature, the vital energy within them, is fundamentally one and indivisible; that what we refer to as imagination, creativity, understanding, and so on, are merely different expressions of the same Power of Insight, all deeply interconnected and related; that if we understand one of them, we could understand all of them. Morality itself, what we call a person’s moral quality, isn’t that just another aspect of the one vital energy through which they exist and act? Everything a person does reflects who they are. You can tell how someone would approach a fight by the way they sing; their courage, or lack thereof, is evident in the words they say, in the opinions they form, just as much as in the actions they take. They are one; and express the same Self in all these ways.
Without hands a man might have feet, and could still walk: but, consider it,—without morality, intellect were impossible for him; a thoroughly immoral man could not know anything at all! To know a thing, what we can call knowing, a man must first love the thing, sympathise with it: that is, be virtuously related to it. If he have not the justice to put down his own selfishness at every turn, the courage to stand by the dangerous-true at every turn, how shall he know? His virtues, all of them, will lie recorded in his knowledge. Nature, with her truth, remains to the bad, to the selfish and the pusillanimous forever a sealed book: what such can know of Nature is mean, superficial, small; for the uses of the day merely.—But does not the very Fox know something of Nature? Exactly so: it knows where the geese lodge! The human Reynard, very frequent everywhere in the world, what more does he know but this and the like of this? Nay, it should be considered, too, that if the Fox had not a certain vulpine morality, he could not even know where the geese were, or get at the geese! If he spent his time in splenetic atrabiliar reflections on his own misery, his ill usage by Nature, Fortune and other Foxes, and so forth; and had not courage, promptitude, practicality, and other suitable vulpine gifts and graces, he would catch no geese. We may say of the Fox too, that his morality and insight are of the same dimensions; different faces of the same internal unity of vulpine life!—These things are worth stating; for the contrary of them acts with manifold very baleful perversion, in this time: what limitations, modifications they require, your own candour will supply.
Without hands, a man might have feet and still be able to walk. But think about it—without morality, it's impossible for him to have intellect; a completely immoral man wouldn't know anything at all! To truly know something, a person must first love it and have sympathy for it; in other words, they need to be virtuously connected to it. If he lacks the fairness to suppress his own selfishness at every turn and the bravery to uphold the difficult truths, how will he truly understand? His virtues will be reflected in his knowledge. Nature, with her truth, remains a sealed book for the bad, the selfish, and the cowardly: what such people can know about Nature is trivial, superficial, and limited—only for immediate purposes. But doesn't even the Fox know something about Nature? Exactly: it knows where the geese are! The human Reynard, who is quite common in the world, what else does he know but this and similar things? It should also be noted that if the Fox didn't possess a certain vulpine morality, he wouldn't even know where the geese are or how to catch them! If he spent his time wallowing in bitter thoughts about his own misery and how poorly he's treated by Nature, Fortune, and other Foxes, and lacked courage, quick thinking, practical skills, and other useful vulpine traits, he wouldn't catch any geese. We can also say that the Fox's morality and insight are intertwined; different aspects of the same essential nature of vulpine life!—These points are worth mentioning; the opposite of them has a very harmful effect on man in this time: what limitations and adjustments they need, your own honesty will clarify.
If I say, therefore, that Shakspeare is the greatest of Intellects, I have said all concerning him. But there is more in Shakspeare’s intellect than we have yet seen. It is what I call an unconscious intellect; there is more virtue in it than he himself is aware of. Novalis beautifully remarks of him, that those Dramas of his are Products of Nature too, deep as Nature herself. I find 340a great truth in this saying. Shakspeare’s Art is not Artifice; the noblest worth of it is not there by plan or precontrivance. It grows-up from the deeps of Nature, through this noble sincere soul, who is a voice of Nature. The latest generations of men will find new meanings in Shakspeare, new elucidations of their own human being; ‘new harmonies with the infinite structure of the Universe; concurrences with later ideas, affinities with the higher powers and senses of man.’ This well deserves meditating. It is Nature’s highest reward to a true simple great soul, that he get thus to be a part of herself. Such a man’s works, whatsoever he with utmost conscious exertion and forethought shall accomplish, grow up withal unconsciously, from the unknown deeps in him;—as the oak-tree grows from the Earth’s bosom, as the mountains and waters shape themselves; with a symmetry grounded on Nature’s own laws, conformable to all Truth whatsoever. How much in Shakspeare lies hid; his sorrows, his silent struggles known to himself; much that was not known at all, not speakable at all; like roots, like sap and forces working underground! Speech is great; but Silence is greater.
If I say that Shakespeare is the greatest of thinkers, that covers everything about him. But there's even more to Shakespeare's intellect than we've seen so far. It's what I call an unconscious intellect; there’s more worth in it than he himself realizes. Novalis beautifully points out that his dramas are also products of nature, as deep as nature itself. I find a profound truth in this statement. Shakespeare's art is not mere artifice; its highest value isn't there by design or planning. It emerges from the depths of nature, through this noble, sincere soul, who is a voice of nature. Future generations will find new meanings in Shakespeare, new insights into their own humanity; ‘new harmonies with the infinite structure of the universe; alignments with later ideas, connections with the higher powers and senses of humankind.’ This is worth pondering. Nature’s greatest reward to a truly simple, great soul is that he becomes a part of herself. The works of such a man, no matter what he accomplishes with the deepest conscious effort and forethought, arise unconsciously from the unknown depths within him; just as an oak tree grows from the earth’s embrace, as mountains and waters take shape; with a balance based on nature’s own laws, consistent with all truth. So much lies hidden in Shakespeare; his sorrows and silent struggles known only to himself; much that was completely unknown, unspeakable; like roots, like sap and forces working underground! Speech is powerful; but silence is even more so.
Withal the joyful tranquillity of this man is notable. I will not blame Dante for his misery: it is as battle without victory; but true battle,—the first, indispensable thing. Yet I call Shakspeare greater than Dante, in that he fought truly, and did conquer. Doubt it not, he had his own sorrows: those Sonnets of his will even testify expressly in what deep waters he had waded, and swum struggling for his life;—as what man like him ever failed to have to do? It seems to me a heedless notion, our common one, that he sat like a bird on the bough; and sang forth, free and offhand, never knowing the troubles of other men. Not so; with no man is it so. How could a man travel forward from rustic deer-poaching to such tragedy-writing, and not fall-in with sorrows by the way? Or, still better, how could a man delineate a Hamlet, a Coriolanus, a Macbeth, so many suffering heroic hearts, if his own heroic heart had never suffered?—And now, in contrast with all this, observe his mirthfulness, his genuine overflowing love 341of laughter! You would say, in no point does he exaggerate but only in laughter. Fiery objurgations, words that pierce and burn, are to be found in Shakspeare; yet he is always in measure here; never what Johnson would remark as a specially ‘good hater.’ But his laughter seems to pour from him in floods; he heaps all manner of ridiculous nicknames on the butt he is bantering, tumbles and tosses him in all sorts of horse-play; you would say, with his whole heart laughs. And then, if not always the finest, it is always a genial laughter. Not at mere weakness, at misery or poverty; never. No man who can laugh, what we call laughing, will laugh at these things. It is some poor character only desiring to laugh, and have the credit of wit, that does so. Laughter means sympathy; good laughter is not ‘the crackling of thorns under the pot.’ Even at stupidity and pretension this Shakspeare does not laugh otherwise than genially. Dogberry and Verges tickle our very hearts; and we dismiss them covered with explosions of laughter: but we like the poor fellows only the better for our laughing; and hope they will get on well there, and continue Presidents of the City-watch. Such laughter, like sunshine on the deep sea, is very beautiful to me.
The joyful calm of this man is remarkable. I won’t fault Dante for his despair; it’s like a battle without victory, but it is a true battle—the first and most essential thing. Still, I say Shakespeare is greater than Dante because he truly fought and did conquer. Don’t doubt it; he had his own struggles. His Sonnets clearly show the deep waters he had to navigate, fighting for his life, just like any man like him. It seems wrong to think he just sat like a bird on a branch, singing freely and without a care, unaware of the troubles others faced. That’s not the case; no one lives that way. How could a man move from hunting deer in the countryside to writing such powerful tragedies without encountering sorrows along the way? Or, even better, how could he create characters like Hamlet, Coriolanus, and Macbeth, all suffering heroic hearts, if his own heroic heart had never endured pain? And now, in contrast to all this, notice his joyfulness and his genuine, overflowing love of laughter! You’d think he only exaggerates in his laughter. He has fiery outbursts, words that cut deeply, but he always maintains a sense of balance; he’s never what Johnson would call a particularly “good hater.” His laughter seems to flow out of him abundantly; he throws all kinds of silly nicknames at whoever he’s teasing, playfully tumbling them in all sorts of antics; it’s clear he laughs with his whole heart. And while it may not always be the most refined, it’s always a warm laughter. Not at mere weakness, misery, or poverty—never. No one who can truly laugh will mock those things. It’s only some weak character who merely wishes to laugh and be seen as witty that does so. Laughter signifies sympathy; genuine laughter isn’t “the crackling of thorns under a pot.” Even at stupidity and pretense, Shakespeare laughs in a kind way. Dogberry and Verges warm our hearts; we leave them laughing, but we actually like those poor guys even more for it, wishing them well as they continue their roles in the City-watch. Such laughter, like sunlight on the deep sea, is truly beautiful to me.
We have no room to speak of Shakspeare’s individual works; though perhaps there is much still waiting to be said on that head. Had we, for instance, all his plays reviewed as Hamlet, in Wilhelm Meister, is! A thing which might, one day, be done. August Wilhelm Schlegel has a remark on his Historical Plays, Henry Fifth and the others, which is worth remembering. He calls them a kind of National Epic. Marlborough, you recollect, said, he knew no English History but what he had learned from Shakspeare. There are really, if we look to it, few as memorable Histories. The great salient points are admirably seized; all rounds itself off, into a kind of rhythmic coherence; it is, as Schlegel says, epic;—as indeed all delineation by a great thinker will be. There are right beautiful things in those Pieces, which indeed together form one beautiful thing. That battle of Agincourt strikes me as one of the most perfect 342things, in its sort, we anywhere have of Shakspeare’s. The description of the two hosts: the worn-out, jaded English; the dread hour, big with destiny, when the battle shall begin; and then that deathless valour: “Ye good yeomen, whose limbs were made in England!” There is a noble Patriotism in it,—far other than the ‘indifference’ you sometimes hear ascribed to Shakspeare. A true English heart breathes, calm and strong, through the whole business; not boisterous, protrusive; all the better for that. There is a sound in it like the ring of steel. This man too had a right stroke in him, had it come to that!
We have no space to discuss Shakespeare's individual works, although there’s probably still plenty to say about them. If we had all his plays reviewed like Hamlet is in Wilhelm Meister, that would be something! Maybe one day it will happen. August Wilhelm Schlegel made a noteworthy comment about his Historical Plays, like Henry Fifth and others, calling them a kind of National Epic. Remember, Marlborough said he didn't know any English history except what he learned from Shakespeare. In reality, there are few histories as memorable. The major highlights are perfectly captured; everything comes together into a sort of rhythmic coherence; it is, as Schlegel says, epic; and truly, that’s how all portrayals by a great thinker should be. There are truly beautiful elements in those pieces, which together form one beautiful whole. The battle of Agincourt strikes me as one of the most perfect examples of Shakespeare’s work. The depiction of the two armies: the worn-out, exhausted English; the tense moment, heavy with fate, just before the battle begins; and then that immortal bravery: “Ye good yeomen, whose limbs were made in England!” There’s a noble patriotism in it that’s very different from the ‘indifference’ sometimes attributed to Shakespeare. A true English spirit resonates, calm and strong, throughout the whole thing; not loud or showy; and that makes it even better. There’s a sound in it like the ring of steel. This man also had a solid strike in him, if it had come to that!
But I will say, of Shakspeare’s works generally, that we have no full impress of him there; even as full as we have of many men. His works are so many windows, through which we see a glimpse of the world that was in him. All his works seem, comparatively speaking, cursory, imperfect, written under cramping circumstances; giving only here and there a note of the full utterance of the man. Passages there are that come upon you like splendour out of Heaven; bursts of radiance, illuminating the very heart of the thing: you say, “That is true, spoken once and forever; wheresoever and whensoever there is an open human soul, that will be recognised as true!” Such bursts, however, make us feel that the surrounding matter is not radiant; that it is, in part, temporary, conventional. Alas, Shakspeare had to write for the Globe Play-house: his great soul had to crush itself, as it could, into that and no other mould. It was with him, then, as it is with us all. No man works save under conditions. The sculptor cannot set his own free Thought before us; but his Thought as he could translate it into the stone that was given, with the tools that were given. Disjecta membra are all that we find of any Poet, or of any man.
But I will say that with Shakespeare’s works overall, we don’t get a complete picture of him; not even as clear as we do of many other people. His works are like windows through which we catch glimpses of the world inside him. Compared to other writings, all of his works seem a bit rushed and unfinished, created under restrictive circumstances; they only occasionally reveal the full expression of the man. There are passages that strike you like brilliance from the heavens; moments of clarity that illuminate the very essence of the subject: you think, “That is true, spoken once and for all; wherever and whenever there’s an open human soul, that will be recognized as true!” However, such moments highlight that the surrounding content isn’t as bright; it’s somewhat temporary and conventional. Sadly, Shakespeare had to write for the Globe Playhouse: his immense talent had to compress itself into that specific format and no other. It’s the same for all of us. No one can create freely without limitations. The sculptor can’t present his free Thought to us; instead, he can only express his Thought through the stone and tools he has. Disjecta membra are all we find of any poet or any person.
Whoever looks intelligently at this Shakspeare may recognise that he too was a Prophet, in his way; of an insight analogous to the Prophetic, though he took it up in another strain. Nature seemed to this man also divine; unspeakable, deep as Tophet, high as Heaven: ‘We are such stuff as Dreams are made of!’ That 343scroll in Westminster Abbey, which few read with understanding, is of the depth of any seer. But the man sang; did not preach, except musically. We called Dante the melodious Priest of Middle-Age Catholicism. May we not call Shakspeare the still more melodious Priest of a true Catholicism, the ‘Universal Church’ of the Future and of all times? No narrow superstition, harsh asceticism, intolerance, fanatical fierceness or perversion: a Revelation, so far as it goes, that such a thousandfold hidden beauty and divineness dwells in all Nature; which let all men worship as they can! We may say without offence, that there rises a kind of universal Psalm out of this Shakspeare too; not unfit to make itself heard among the still more sacred Psalms. Not in disharmony with these, if we understood them, but in harmony!—I cannot call this Shakspeare a ‘Sceptic,’ as some do; his indifference to the creeds and theological quarrels of his time misleading them. No: neither unpatriotic, though he says little about his Patriotism; nor sceptic, though he says little about his Faith. Such ‘indifference’ was the fruit of his greatness withal: his whole heart was in his own grand sphere of worship (we may call it such): these other controversies, vitally important to other men, were not vital to him.
Whoever looks closely at Shakespeare may recognize that he was a kind of Prophet in his own right, with an insight that's somewhat prophetic, although he approached it differently. Nature seemed divine to him as well; it was profound, as deep as Hell and as high as Heaven: 'We are such stuff as Dreams are made of!' That 343 scroll in Westminster Abbey, which few truly understand, has depth comparable to any seer. But this man sang; he didn’t preach, except in a musical way. We call Dante the melodious Priest of Middle-Age Catholicism. Can we not also call Shakespeare the even more melodious Priest of a true Catholicism, which is the 'Universal Church' of the Future and all times? There is no narrow superstition, harsh asceticism, intolerance, fanatical fierceness, or perversion here: it’s a Revelation, as far as it goes, that an incredible hidden beauty and divinity exists in all Nature; let everyone worship as best they can! We can say without offense that a kind of universal Psalm arises from this Shakespeare as well; one that could hold its own among even the more sacred Psalms. It’s not in disharmony with these, if we truly understood them, but in harmony!—I can’t label Shakespeare a ‘Sceptic,’ as some do; their perception of his indifference to the creeds and theological disputes of his time is misleading. No: he wasn’t unpatriotic, even if he says little about his Patriotism; nor was he a sceptic, even if he says little about his Faith. Such 'indifference' was a result of his greatness; his whole heart was in his own grand sphere of worship (we can call it that): these other controversies, which were vitally important to others, were not vital to him.
But call it worship, call it what you will, is it not a right glorious thing, and set of things, this that Shakspeare has brought us? For myself, I feel that there is actually a kind of sacredness in the fact of such a man being sent into this Earth. Is he not an eye to us all; a blessed heaven-sent Bringer of Light?—And, at bottom, was it not perhaps far better that this Shakspeare, everyway an unconscious man, was conscious of no Heavenly message? He did not feel, like Mahomet, because he saw into those internal Splendours, that he specially was the ‘Prophet of God:’ and was he not greater than Mahomet in that? Greater; and also, if we compute strictly, as we did in Dante’s case, more successful. It was intrinsically an error that notion of Mahomet’s, of his supreme Prophethood: and has come down to us inextricably involved in error to this day; dragging along with it such a coil of fables, impurities, 344intolerances, as makes it a questionable step for me here and now to say, as I have done, that Mahomet was a true Speaker at all, and not rather an ambitious charlatan, perversity and simulacrum; no Speaker, but a Babbler! Even in Arabia, as I compute, Mahomet will have exhausted himself and become obsolete, while this Shakspeare, this Dante may still be young;—while this Shakspeare may still pretend to be a Priest of Mankind, of Arabia as of other places, for unlimited periods to come!
But whether you call it worship or something else, isn’t it an amazing thing that Shakespeare has given us? Personally, I believe there’s something sacred about the very fact that such a man existed on this Earth. Isn’t he like an eye for all of us; a blessed, heaven-sent Bringer of Light?—And, in the end, wasn’t it probably better that Shakespeare, who was completely unaware, didn’t consider himself to have any divine message? He didn’t think, like Muhammad, that seeing into those inner beauties made him a ‘Prophet of God’: isn’t that a sign of his greatness? Greater; and if we analyze strictly, as we did with Dante, he was also more successful. The idea of Muhammad’s supreme Prophethood was fundamentally mistaken; it has come down to us tangled in error even now, dragging along a mess of myths, impurities, 344and intolerances, making it a questionable thing for me to say that Muhammad was a true Speaker at all, instead of just an ambitious fraud, a distortion and imitation; a Babbler! Even in Arabia, I believe Muhammad will have worn out and become irrelevant, while this Shakespeare, this Dante may still feel fresh;—while this Shakespeare may continue to act as a Priest of Mankind, in Arabia and beyond, for an indefinite time to come!
Compared with any speaker or singer one knows, even with Æschylus or Homer, why should he not, for veracity and universality, last like them? He is sincere as they; reaches deep down like them, to the universal and perennial. But as for Mahomet, I think it had been better for him not to be so conscious! Alas, poor Mahomet; all that he was conscious of was a mere error; a futility and triviality,—as indeed such ever is. The truly great in him too was the unconscious: that he was a wild Arab lion of the desert, and did speak-out with that great thunder-voice of his, not by words which he thought to be great, but by actions, by feelings, by a history which were great! His Koran has become a stupid piece of prolix absurdity; we do not believe, like him, that God wrote that! The Great Man here too, as always, is a Force of Nature: whatsoever is truly great in him springs-up from the inarticulate deeps.
Compared to any speaker or singer you know, even Æschylus or Homer, why shouldn't he last like them in terms of truthfulness and universality? He is sincere like they are; he digs deep down to the universal and timeless just like they do. But as for Muhammad, I think it would have been better for him to be less aware! Alas, poor Muhammad; all that he was aware of was a simple mistake; a futility and triviality, as such things always are. The truly great part of him was the unconscious: he was a wild Arab lion of the desert and he expressed himself with that powerful thunderous voice, not through words he thought were great, but through actions, feelings, and a history that were great! His Quran has become a confusing piece of long-winded nonsense; we don't believe, like he did, that God wrote that! The Great Man here, as always, is a Force of Nature: whatever is truly great in him comes from the unspoken depths.
Well: this is our poor Warwickshire Peasant, who rose to be Manager of a Playhouse, so that he could live without begging; whom the Earl of Southampton cast some kind glances on; whom Sir Thomas Lucy, many thanks to him, was for sending to the Treadmill! We did not account him a god, like Odin, while he dwelt with us;—on which point there were much to be said. But I will say rather, or repeat: In spite of the sad state Hero-worship now lies in, consider what this Shakspeare has actually become among us. Which Englishman we ever made, in this land of ours, which million of Englishmen, would we not give-up rather than the Stratford Peasant? There is no regiment of highest Dignitaries that we would sell him for. He is the grandest 345thing we have yet done. For our honour among foreign nations, as an ornament to our English Household, what item is there that we would not surrender rather than him? Consider now, if they asked us, Will you give-up your Indian Empire or your Shakspeare, you English; never have had any Indian Empire, or never have had any Shakspeare? Really it were a grave question. Official persons would answer doubtless in official language; but we, for our part too, should not we be forced to answer: Indian Empire, or no Indian Empire; we cannot do without Shakspeare! Indian Empire will go, at any rate, some day; but this Shakspeare does not go, he lasts forever with us; we cannot give-up our Shakspeare!
Well, this is our poor Warwickshire peasant who became the Manager of a theater so he could live without begging; the one the Earl of Southampton looked at kindly; the one Sir Thomas Lucy, thanks to him, wanted to send to the Treadmill! We didn't consider him a god, like Odin, while he was with us—there’s a lot to say about that. But what I want to emphasize is that despite the sad state of hero worship today, look at what this Shakespeare has truly become among us. Which Englishman, out of all of us, would we rather give up than the Stratford peasant? There’s no group of top dignitaries we would trade him for. He is the greatest thing we have done. For our honor among foreign nations, as a point of pride in our English culture, what would we give up rather than him? Now consider this: if someone asked us, would you give up your Indian Empire or your Shakespeare, you English; never had an Indian Empire, or never had a Shakespeare? It would really be a serious question. Official people would probably respond in official terms, but we would have to answer: Indian Empire or no Indian Empire; we cannot live without Shakespeare! The Indian Empire will vanish someday, but this Shakespeare will remain with us forever; we cannot give up our Shakespeare!
Nay, apart from spiritualities; and considering him merely as a real, marketable, tangibly-useful possession. England, before long, this Island of ours, will hold but a small fraction of the English: in America, in New Holland, east and west to the very Antipodes, there will be a Saxondom covering great spaces of the Globe. And now, what is it that can keep all these together into virtually one Nation, so that they do not fall-out and fight, but live at peace, in brotherlike intercourse, helping one another? This is justly regarded as the greatest practical problem, the thing all manner of sovereignties and governments are here to accomplish: what is it that will accomplish this? Acts of Parliament, administrative prime-ministers cannot. America is parted from us, so far as Parliament could part it. Call it not fantastic, for there is much reality in it: Here, I say, is an English King, whom no time or chance, Parliament or combination of Parliaments, can dethrone! This King Shakspeare, does not he shine, in crowned sovereignty, over us all, as the noblest, gentlest, yet strongest of rallying-signs; indestructible; really more valuable in that point of view than any other means or appliance whatsoever? We can fancy him as radiant aloft over all the Nations of Englishmen, a thousand years hence. From Paramatta, from New York, wheresoever, under what sort of Parish-Constable soever, English men and women are, they will say to one another: “Yes, this Shakspeare is ours; we produced 346him, we speak and think by him; we are of one blood and kind with him.” The most common-sense politician too, if he pleases, may think of that.
No, putting aside spiritual matters and thinking of him simply as a real, marketable, and useful possession. Before long, England—this island of ours—will contain only a small fraction of the English. In America, in New Holland, and across the globe to the Antipodes, there will be a Saxondom covering vast areas. So, what can keep all these people together as one nation, so they don’t fall apart and fight but instead live peacefully, in a brotherly manner, helping each other? This is rightly considered the greatest practical challenge, the goal that all kinds of governments and authorities are meant to achieve: what can accomplish this? Acts of Parliament and administrative prime ministers cannot. America has been separated from us as much as Parliament could manage. Don't dismiss this as fanciful; there’s a lot of reality to it. Here, I assert, is an English King whom no amount of time, chance, Parliament, or any combination of Parliaments can dethrone! This King Shakespeare, doesn’t he shine in crowned sovereignty over all of us, as the noblest, gentlest, yet strongest symbol to rally around; indestructible; actually more valuable in that sense than any other means or tools? We can imagine him shining above all the nations of English speakers a thousand years from now. From Paramatta, from New York, anywhere, under any type of local authority, English men and women will say to one another: “Yes, this Shakespeare is ours; we produced him, we speak and think through him; we are of one blood and kind with him.” Even the most practical politician, if he chooses, can consider that.
Yes, truly, it is a great thing for a Nation that it get an articulate voice; that it produce a man who will speak-forth melodiously what the heart of it means! Italy, for example, poor Italy lies dismembered, scattered asunder, not appearing in any protocol or treaty as a unity at all; yet the noble Italy is actually one: Italy produced its Dante; Italy can speak! The Czar of all the Russias, he is strong, with so many bayonets, Cossacks and cannons; and does a great feat in keeping such a tract of Earth politically together; but he cannot yet speak. Something great in him, but it is a dumb greatness. He has had no voice of genius, to be heard of all men and times. He must learn to speak. He is a great dumb monster hitherto. His cannons and Cossacks will all have rusted into nonentity, while that Dante’s voice is still audible. The Nation that has a Dante is bound together as no dumb Russia can be.—We must here end what we had to say of the Hero-Poet.
Yes, truly, it’s an amazing thing for a nation to find its voice; to produce someone who can express beautifully what its heart truly feels! Take Italy, for example—poor Italy lies fragmented, scattered and doesn’t appear as a united entity in any agreements or treaties; yet noble Italy is actually one: Italy gave us Dante; Italy can speak! The Czar of all the Russias is powerful, with countless soldiers and cannons; and he achieves the significant task of holding such a vast land together politically; but he still cannot speak. There’s something great in him, but it’s a mute greatness. He hasn’t had a voice of genius that can be heard by all people and across all time. He must learn to speak. Until now, he’s been a great silent monster. His cannons and soldiers will eventually fade into nothingness, while Dante’s voice will still resonate. A nation with a Dante is more unified than any silent Russia can ever be.—We must now conclude our thoughts on the Hero-Poet.
LECTURE IV
Lecture 4
THE HERO AS PRIEST. LUTHER; REFORMATION: KNOX; PURITANISM.
[Friday, 15th May 1840]
[Friday, May 15, 1840]
Our present discourse is to be of the Great Man as Priest. We have repeatedly endeavoured to explain that all sorts of Heroes are intrinsically of the same material; that given a great soul, open to the Divine Significance of Life, then there is given a man fit to speak of this, to sing of this, to fight and work for this, in a great, victorious, enduring manner; there is given a Hero,—the outward shape of whom will depend on the time and the environment he finds himself in. The priest too, as I understand it, is a kind of 347Prophet; in him too there is required to be a light of inspiration, as we must name it. He presides over the worship of the people; is the Uniter of them with the Unseen Holy. He is the spiritual Captain of the people; as the Prophet is their spiritual King with many captains: he guides them heavenward, by wise guidance through this Earth and its work. The ideal of him is, that he too be what we can call a voice from the unseen Heaven; interpreting, even as the Prophet did, and in a more familiar manner unfolding the same to men. The unseen Heaven,—the ‘open secret of the Universe,’—which so few have an eye for! He is the Prophet shorn of his more awful splendour; burning with mild equable radiance, as the enlightener of daily life. This, I say, is the ideal of a Priest. So in old times; so in these, and in all times. One knows very well that, in reducing ideals to practice, great latitude of tolerance is needful; very great. But a Priest who is not this at all, who does not any longer aim or try to be this, is a character—of whom we had rather not speak in this place.
Our current discussion is about the Great Man as Priest. We've often tried to explain that all types of Heroes come from the same core; when there's a great soul open to the Divine Significance of Life, there's someone ready to speak, sing, fight, and work for this in a magnificent, successful, and lasting way; this person is a Hero, whose outward appearance will depend on the time and environment they exist in. The priest, as I see it, is also a kind of 347Prophet; within him, there needs to be a light of inspiration, as we must call it. He leads the worship of the people and connects them with the Unseen Holy. He is the spiritual Captain of the people, while the Prophet is their spiritual King supported by many captains: he guides them towards heaven, offering wise guidance through Earth and its tasks. The ideal of him is that he too should be what we might call a voice from the unseen Heaven; interpreting, much like the Prophet did, and more casually revealing this to people. The unseen Heaven—the ‘open secret of the Universe’—which so few recognize! He is the Prophet stripped of his more daunting glory, shining with soft, steady light as the enlightener of everyday life. This, I say, is the ideal of a Priest. So it was in ancient times; so it is now, and so it will always be. It's clear that when it comes to making ideals a reality, a great deal of tolerance is essential; very much so. But a Priest who is none of this, who no longer strives or aims to be this, is a character we’d rather not discuss here.
Luther and Knox were by express vocation Priests, and did faithfully perform that function in its common sense. Yet it will suit us better here to consider them chiefly in their historical character, rather as Reformers than Priests. There have been other Priests perhaps equally notable, in calmer times, for doing faithfully the office of a Leader of Worship; bringing down, by faithful heroism in that kind, a light from Heaven into the daily life of their people; leading them forward, as under God’s guidance, in the way wherein they were to go. But when this same way was a rough one, of battle, confusion and danger, the spiritual Captain, who led through that, becomes, especially to us who live under the fruit of his leading, more notable than any other. He is the warfaring and battling Priest; who led his people, not to quiet faithful labour as in smooth times, but to faithful valorous conflict, in times all violent, dismembered: a more perilous service, and a more memorable one, be it higher or not. These two men we will account our best Priests, inasmuch as they were our best Reformers. Nay I may ask, Is not every 348true Reformer, by the nature of him, a Priest first of all? He appeals to Heaven’s invisible justice against Earth’s visible force; knows that it, the invisible, is strong and alone strong. He is a believer in the divine truth of things; a seer, seeing through the shows of things; a worshipper, in one way or the other, of the divine truth of things; a Priest, that is. If he be not first a Priest, he will never be good for much as a Reformer.
Luther and Knox were specifically called to be priests and faithfully carried out that role in its usual sense. However, it makes more sense for us to look at them primarily as historical figures, more as Reformers than as priests. There have been other priests, perhaps equally noteworthy, in more peaceful times, who faithfully led worship; bringing down, through their dedicated heroism, a light from Heaven into the everyday lives of their people; guiding them, under God’s direction, in the path they were meant to take. But when that same path was a harsh one, filled with battles, chaos, and dangers, the spiritual leader who guided through that becomes, especially for us who benefit from their leadership, more significant than anyone else. He is the fighting and contending priest; who led his people, not to peaceful faithful work in smooth times, but to brave and determined conflict during tumultuous, fragmented times: a more dangerous service, and a more memorable one, whether it is greater or not. We consider these two men our best priests, because they were also our best Reformers. Indeed, I might ask, isn’t every true Reformer, by their very nature, a priest first? They appeal to Heaven’s unseen justice against the visible power of Earth; they understand that the unseen is strong and solely strong. They believe in the divine truth of things; they are seers, looking beyond the appearances of things; worshippers, in one way or another, of the divine truth of existence; a priest, in other words. If they are not first a priest, they won’t be much good as a Reformer.
Thus, then, as we have seen Great Men, in various situations, building up Religions, heroic Forms of human Existence in this world, Theories of Life worthy to be sung by a Dante, Practices of Life by a Shakspeare,—we are now to see the reverse process; which also is necessary, which also may be carried on in the Heroic manner. Curious how this should be necessary; yet necessary it is. The mild shining of the Poet’s light has to give place to the fierce lightning of the Reformer: unfortunately the Reformer too is a personage that cannot fail in History! The Poet indeed, with his mildness, what is he but the product and ultimate adjustment of Reform, or Prophecy with its fierceness? No wild Saint Dominics and Thebaïd Eremites, there had been no melodious Dante; rough Practical Endeavour, Scandinavian and other, from Odin to Walter Raleigh, from Ulfila to Cranmer, enabled Shakspeare to speak. Nay the finished Poet, I remark sometimes, is a symptom that his epoch itself has reached perfection and is finished; that before long there will be a new epoch, new Reformers needed.
So, as we’ve seen great people in different situations creating religions, heroic ways of living in this world, theories of life worthy of being celebrated by a Dante, and lifestyles worthy of a Shakespeare, now we’re going to look at the opposite process; which is also necessary and can be done in a heroic way. It’s interesting how this is necessary; yet it is. The gentle glow of the poet’s light must give way to the fierce lightning of the reformer: unfortunately, the reformer is a figure that cannot be ignored in history! The poet, with his gentleness, is really just the end result and perfect balance of reform or prophecy with its intensity. Without wild figures like Saint Dominic and the desert hermits, there would be no melodic Dante; tough practical efforts, Scandinavian and others, from Odin to Walter Raleigh, from Ulfila to Cranmer, made it possible for Shakespeare to speak. Indeed, I sometimes notice that a completed poet is a sign that their era itself has reached perfection and is coming to an end; which means a new era and new reformers will soon be needed.
Doubtless it were finer, could we go along always in the way of music; be tamed and taught by our Poets, as the rude creatures were by their Orpheus of old. Or failing this rhythmic musical way, how good were it could we get so much as into the equable way; I mean, if peaceable Priests, reforming from day to day, would always suffice us! But it is not so; even this latter has not yet been realised. Alas, the battling Reformer too is, from time to time, a needful and inevitable phenomenon. Obstructions are never wanting: the very things that were once indispensable furtherances become obstructions; and need to be shaken off, and left behind us,—a business often of enormous difficulty. It is 349notable enough, surely, how a Theorem or spiritual Representation, so we may call it, which once took in the whole Universe, and was completely satisfactory in all parts of it to the highly-discursive acute intellect of Dante, one of the greatest in the world,—had in the course of another century become dubitable to common intellects; become deniable; and is now, to every one of us, flatly incredible, obsolete as Odin’s Theorem! To Dante, human Existence, and God’s ways with men, were all well represented by those Malebolges, Purgatorios; to Luther not well. How was this? Why could not Dante’s Catholicism continue; but Luther’s Protestantism must needs follow? Alas, nothing will continue.
It would definitely be better if we could always follow the path of music; being guided and taught by our poets, just like the wild creatures were by their Orpheus long ago. Or if we can't achieve that rhythmic musical path, how nice would it be if we could at least find a way to be equable; I mean, if peaceful priests, reforming day by day, could always be enough for us! But it’s not like that; even this hasn’t happened yet. Unfortunately, the fighting reformer is sometimes a necessary and unavoidable reality. There are always obstacles: even things that were once essential aids become hindrances; and they need to be shaken off and left behind—a task that is often incredibly difficult. It’s 349quite striking how a theorem or spiritual representation, if we can call it that, which once encompassed the entire universe and was completely satisfying in every part to the highly analytical and sharp mind of Dante, one of the greatest poets in history, became questionable to average minds over another century; it became deniable, and now, for each of us, it is outright unbelievable, as outdated as Odin’s Theorem! To Dante, human existence and God’s dealings with people were well represented by those Malebolges and Purgatorios; but to Luther, they were not. How did this happen? Why couldn’t Dante’s Catholicism endure, but Luther’s Protestantism had to emerge? Unfortunately, nothing will continue.
I do not make much of ‘Progress of the Species,’ as handled in these times of ours; nor do I think you would care to hear much about it. The talk on that subject is too often of the most extravagant, confused sort. Yet I may say, the fact itself seems certain enough; nay we can trace out the inevitable necessity of it in the nature of things. Every man, as I have stated somewhere, is not only a learner but a doer: he learns with the mind given him what has been; but with the same mind he discovers farther, he invents and devises somewhat of his own. Absolutely without originality there is no man. No man whatever believes, or can believe, exactly what his grandfather believed: he enlarges somewhat, by fresh discovery, his view of the Universe, and consequently his Theorem of the Universe,—which is an infinite Universe, and can never be embraced wholly or finally by any view or Theorem, in any conceivable enlargement: he enlarges somewhat, I say; finds somewhat that was credible to his grandfather incredible to him, false to him, inconsistent with some new thing he has discovered or observed. It is the history of every man; and in the history of Mankind we see it summed-up into great historical amounts,—revolutions, new epochs. Dante’s Mountain of Purgatory does not stand ‘in the ocean of the other Hemisphere,’ when Columbus has once sailed thither! Men find no such thing extant in the other Hemisphere. It is not there. It must cease to be believed to be there. So with all beliefs whatsoever 350in this world,—all Systems of Belief, and Systems of Practice that spring from these.
I don’t think much of the 'Progress of the Species' as it's talked about today; I doubt you’d want to hear too much about it either. The conversations around it are often overly dramatic and confusing. Still, the reality seems pretty clear; we can see the necessity of it in the way things are. Every person, as I’ve mentioned before, is not just a learner but also an actor: they learn with the mind they've been given about what has happened, and with that same mind, they explore further, inventing and creating their own ideas. There’s no person without originality. No one believes exactly what their grandfather believed; they expand their understanding of the universe through new discoveries, and thus their view of the universe—an infinite universe—can never be fully captured by any single perspective or theory, no matter how broad. They expand their thinking, I say; they realize that some ideas their grandfather found credible are now unbelievable or false to them, conflicting with new things they’ve discovered or observed. This is the story of every person, and in the story of humanity, we see it reflected in major historical events—revolutions, new eras. Dante’s Mountain of Purgatory does not exist ‘in the ocean of the other Hemisphere’ once Columbus has sailed there! People find nothing like that in the other Hemisphere. It’s simply not there. It must stop being believed to exist. The same goes for all beliefs in this world—every System of Belief, and the Systems of Practice that come from them. 350
If we add now the melancholy fact, that when Belief waxes uncertain, Practice too becomes unsound, and errors, injustices and miseries everywhere more and more prevail, we shall see material enough for revolution. At all turns, a man who will do faithfully, needs to believe firmly. If he have to ask at every turn the world’s suffrage; if he cannot dispense with the world’s suffrage, and make his own suffrage serve, he is a poor eye-servant; the work committed to him will be misdone. Every such man is a daily contributor to the inevitable downfall. Whatsoever work he does, dishonestly, with an eye to the outward look of it, is a new offence, parent of new misery to somebody or other. Offences accumulate till they become insupportable; and are then violently burst through, cleared off as by explosion. Dante’s sublime Catholicism, incredible now in theory, and defaced still worse by faithless, doubting and dishonest practice, has to be torn asunder by a Luther; Shakspeare’s noble feudalism, as beautiful as it once looked and was, has to end in a French Revolution. The accumulation of offences is, as we say, too literally exploded, blasted asunder volcanically; and there are long troublous periods before matters come to a settlement again.
If we acknowledge the sad truth that when belief starts to waver, practice becomes shaky too, and errors, injustices, and suffering increasingly take hold, we can see plenty of reasons for revolution. At every turn, a person who wants to act sincerely needs to have strong beliefs. If he has to seek approval from others at every step, and can’t rely on his own judgment, he’s a poor servant; the work assigned to him will be done poorly. Each such person contributes daily to the inevitable collapse. Any work he does dishonestly, focused only on appearances, leads to new wrongs and brings misery to someone. Offenses pile up until they become unbearable; then they explode in a violent release. Dante’s grand Catholicism, unbelievable in theory now and even more tarnished by faithless, doubtful, and dishonest practice, needs to be dismantled by a Luther; Shakespeare’s once-noble feudalism, beautiful as it used to be, must lead to a French Revolution. The buildup of offenses is, as we say, quite literally exploded, blasted apart volcanically, and there are long troubled periods before things settle down again.
Surely it were mournful enough to look only at this face of the matter, and find in all human opinions and arrangements merely the fact that they were uncertain, temporary, subject to the law of death! At bottom, it is not so: all death, here too we find, is but of the body, not of the essence or soul; all destruction, by violent revolution or howsoever it be, is but new creation on a wider scale. Odinism was Valour; Christianism was Humility, a nobler kind of Valour. No thought that ever dwelt honestly as true in the heart of man but was an honest insight into God’s truth on man’s part, and has an essential truth in it which endures through all changes, an everlasting possession for us all. And, on the other hand, what a melancholy notion is that, which has to represent all men, in all countries and times except our own, as having spent 351their life in blind condemnable error, mere lost Pagans, Scandinavians, Mahometans, only that we might have the true ultimate knowledge! All generations of men were lost and wrong, only that this present little section of a generation might be saved and right. They all marched forward there, all generations since the beginning of the world, like the Russian soldiers into the ditch of Schweidnitz Fort, only to fill-up the ditch with their dead bodies, that we might march-over and take the place! It is an incredible hypothesis.
Surely, it would be sad enough to look only at this aspect of the matter and find that all human opinions and arrangements are just uncertain, temporary, and subject to death! But fundamentally, that's not the case: all death, even here, is only about the body, not about the essence or soul; all destruction, whether through violent revolution or in any form, is just new creation on a larger scale. Odinism was Valor; Christianity was Humility, a nobler form of Valor. No thought that ever honestly resided in the human heart was anything other than a sincere insight into God’s truth from humanity’s perspective, and it holds an essential truth that endures through all changes, an everlasting possession for all of us. On the other hand, what a bleak idea it is to think that all people, in all countries and times except our own, spent their lives in blind, condemnable error, mere lost Pagans, Scandinavians, Mahometans, just so we could have the true ultimate knowledge! All generations of people were lost and wrong just so this tiny section of a generation could be saved and right. They all moved forward, all generations since the beginning of the world, like Russian soldiers into the ditch of Schweidnitz Fort, only to fill the ditch with their dead bodies so that we could march over and claim the place! It’s an unbelievable hypothesis.
Such incredible hypothesis we have seen maintained with fierce emphasis; and this or the other poor individual man, with his sect of individual men, marching as over the dead bodies of all men, towards sure victory: but when he too, with his hypothesis and ultimate infallible credo, sank into the ditch, and became a dead body, what was to be said?—Withal, it is an important fact in the nature of man, that he tends to reckon his own insight as final, and goes upon it as such. He will always do it, I suppose, in one or the other way; but it must be in some wider, wiser way than this. Are not all true men that live, or that ever lived, soldiers of the same army, enlisted, under Heaven’s captaincy, to do battle against the same enemy, the Empire of Darkness and Wrong? Why should we misknow one another, fight not against the enemy but against ourselves, from mere difference of uniform? All uniforms shall be good, so they hold in them true valiant men. All fashions of arms, the Arab turban and swift scimetar, Thor’s strong hammer smiting down Jötuns, shall be welcome. Luther’s battle-voice, Dante’s march-melody, all genuine things are with us, not against us. We are all under one Captain, soldiers of the same host.—Let us now look a little at this Luther’s fighting; what kind of battle it was, and how he comported himself in it. Luther too was of our spiritual Heroes; a Prophet to his country and time.
Such incredible ideas we've seen held with fierce determination; and this or that poor individual man, along with his group of followers, marching as if over the dead bodies of everyone else, toward certain victory: but when he too, with his beliefs and ultimate unshakeable truths, fell into the ditch and became one of those dead bodies, what could be said?—Nevertheless, it's a significant fact about human nature that people tend to regard their own insights as final and act on them as if they are. I suppose they'll always do this in one way or another; but it has to be in some broader, wiser way than this. Aren't all true people who live, or who have ever lived, part of the same army, enlisting under Heaven’s guidance to fight against the same enemy, the Empire of Darkness and Injustice? Why should we misunderstand each other, fighting not against the enemy but against ourselves, just because of different uniforms? All uniforms are good as long as they house true brave individuals. All styles of weapons, whether it’s the Arab turban and swift scimitar or Thor’s mighty hammer striking down Jötuns, should be welcomed. Luther’s battle cry, Dante’s march song, all genuine things stand with us, not against us. We are all under one Captain, soldiers of the same force.—Now, let’s take a closer look at Luther’s battle; what kind of fight it was and how he handled himself in it. Luther was also one of our spiritual Heroes; a Prophet for his country and his time.
As introductory to the whole, a remark about Idolatry will perhaps be in place here. One of Mahomet’s characteristics, which indeed belongs to all Prophets, is unlimited implacable zeal against Idolatry. It is the 352grand theme of Prophets: Idolatry, the worshipping of dead Idols as the Divinity, is a thing they cannot away-with, but have to denounce continually, and brand with inexpiable reprobation; it is the chief of all the sins they see done under the sun. This is worth noting. We will not enter here into the theological question about Idolatry. Idol is Eidolon, a thing seen, a symbol. It is not God, but a Symbol of God; and perhaps one may question whether any the most benighted mortal ever took it for more than a Symbol. I fancy, he did not think that the poor image his own hands had made was God; but that God was emblemed by it, that God was in it some way or another. And now in this sense, one may ask, Is not all worship whatsoever a worship by Symbols, by eidola, or things seen? Whether seen, rendered visible as an image or picture to the bodily eye; or visible only to the inward eye, to the imagination, to the intellect: this makes a superficial, but no substantial difference. It is still a Thing Seen, significant of Godhead; an Idol. The most rigorous Puritan has his Confession of Faith, and intellectual Representation of Divine things, and worships thereby; thereby is worship first made possible for him. All creeds, liturgies, religious forms, conceptions that fitly invest religious feelings, are in this sense eidola, things seen. All worship whatsoever must proceed by Symbols, by Idols:—we may say, all Idolatry is comparative, and the worst Idolatry is only more idolatrous.
As an introduction to everything, a note about Idolatry might be relevant here. One characteristic of Mahomet, which actually applies to all Prophets, is an intense and unyielding opposition to Idolatry. This is the 352central theme of Prophets: The worship of dead Idols as if they were the Divine is something they cannot tolerate, and they must constantly condemn it and label it with severe disapproval; it is the worst of all sins they see happening in the world. This is important to recognize. We won't delve into the theological debate about Idolatry here. An Idol is Eidolon, something visible, a symbol. It is not God, but a Symbol of God; and maybe one could argue that even the most ignorant person never believed it was anything more than a Symbol. I suspect he did not think that the poor image he created with his own hands was God; rather, he thought that God was represented by it, that God was in it in some way. And now in this sense, one might ask, isn’t all worship in some way worship by Symbols, by eidola, or things seen? Whether seen, made visible as an image or picture to the physical eye; or visible only to the inner eye, to the imagination, to the intellect: this creates a surface-level, but no substantial difference. It remains a Thing Seen, indicative of the Divine; an Idol. The most strict Puritan holds his Confession of Faith, and an intellectual representation of Divine matters, and worships through that; through that, worship is made possible for him. All creeds, liturgies, religious forms, and concepts that appropriately render religious feelings are in this sense eidola, things sensed. All forms of worship must proceed through Symbols, through Idols:—we could say, all Idolatry is relative, and the worst Idolatry is just more idolatrous.
Where, then, lies the evil of it? some fatal evil must lie in it, or earnest prophetic men would not on all hands so reprobate it. Why is Idolatry so hateful to Prophets? It seems to me as if, in the worship of those poor wooden symbols, the thing that had chiefly provoked the Prophet, and filled his inmost soul with indignation and aversion, was not exactly what suggested itself to his own thought, and came out of him in words to others, as the thing. The rudest heathen that worshipped Canopus, or the Caabah Black-Stone, he, as we saw, was superior to the horse that worshipped nothing at all! Nay there was a kind of lasting merit in that poor act of his; analogous to what is still meritorious in Poets: recognition of a certain endless 353divine beauty and significance in stars and all natural objects whatsoever. Why should the Prophet so mercilessly condemn him? The poorest mortal worshipping his Fetish, while his heart is full of it, may be an object of pity, of contempt and avoidance, if you will; but cannot surely be an object of hatred. Let his heart be honestly full of it, the whole space of his dark narrow mind illuminated thereby; in one word, let him entirely believe in his Fetish,—it will then be, I should say, if not well with him, yet as well as it can readily be made to be, and you will leave him alone, unmolested there.
Where does the evil lie, then? There must be some serious flaw in it, or prophetic figures wouldn't condemn it so universally. Why do Prophets despise Idolatry? It seems to me that, in the worship of those simple wooden symbols, what angered the Prophet the most and filled him with deep indignation and disgust wasn’t necessarily the obvious issue that he expressed in words to others. The simplest pagan worshipping Canopus, or the Kaaba's Black Stone, as we saw, was still better than the horse that worshipped nothing at all! In fact, there was a kind of enduring merit in that primitive act, similar to what still holds value for Poets: recognizing a certain endless 353divine beauty and significance in stars and all natural objects. Why would the Prophet so harshly judge him? The most destitute person worshipping his Fetish, while genuinely devoted, can be pitied, looked down upon, or avoided if you like; but surely he cannot be hated. If his heart is truly filled with it, illuminating the entire limited space of his dark mind; in other words, if he completely believes in his Fetish—then I would say, even if things aren't perfect for him, they would be as good as they could realistically be, and you would leave him alone, undisturbed there.
But here enters the fatal circumstance of Idolatry, that, in the era of the Prophets, no man’s mind is any longer honestly filled with his Idol or Symbol. Before the Prophet can arise who, seeing through it, knows it to be mere wood, many men must have begun dimly to doubt that it was little more. Condemnable Idolatry is insincere Idolatry. Doubt has eaten-out the heart of it: a human soul is seen clinging spasmodically to an Ark of the Covenant, which it half-feels now to have become a Phantasm. This is one of the balefulest sights. Souls are no longer filled with their Fetish; but only pretend to be filled, and would fain make themselves feel that they are filled. “You do not believe,” said Coleridge; “you only believe that you believe.” It is the final scene in all kinds of Worship and Symbolism; the sure symptom that death is now nigh. It is equivalent to what we call Formulism, and Worship of Formulas, in these days of ours. No more immoral act can be done by a human creature; for it is the beginning of all immorality, or rather it is the impossibility henceforth of any morality whatsoever: the innermost moral soul is paralysed thereby, cast into fatal magnetic sleep! Men are no longer sincere men. I do not wonder that the earnest man denounces this, brands it, prosecutes it with unextinguishable aversion. He and it, all good and it, are at death-feud. Blamable Idolatry is Cant, and even what one may call Sincere-Cant. Sincere-Cant: that is worth thinking of! Every sort of Worship ends with this phasis.
But here comes the crucial issue of Idolatry, that during the time of the Prophets, no one's mind is genuinely filled with their Idol or Symbol. Before a Prophet can emerge who sees through it and recognizes it as just wood, many people must have started to doubt that it was anything more. Condemnable Idolatry is insincere Idolatry. Doubt has hollowed it out: a human soul is seen desperately clinging to an Ark of the Covenant, which it half-senses has now become an illusion. This is one of the most distressing sights. Souls are no longer filled with their Fetish; they only pretend to be filled and wish to convince themselves that they are. “You do not believe,” said Coleridge; “you only believe that you believe.” It is the final act in all forms of Worship and Symbolism; a clear indication that death is approaching. It corresponds to what we refer to as Formulism and the Worship of Formulas in our time. No more immoral act can be committed by a human being; for it signifies the start of all immorality, or rather, it marks the impossibility of any morality at all from that point onward: the deepest moral soul is paralyzed, thrown into a fatal magnetic sleep! People are no longer sincere individuals. I am not surprised that the earnest person denounces this, criticizes it, and opposes it with unquenchable disgust. They and it, all that is good and it, are at war. Blamable Idolatry is Cant, even what one might call Sincere-Cant. Sincere-Cant: that is worth considering! Every kind of Worship ends with this phase.
I find Luther to have been a Breaker of Idols, no less than any other Prophet. The wooden gods of the 354Koreish, made of timber and bees-wax, were not more hateful to Mahomet than Tetzel’s Pardons of Sin, made of sheepskin and ink, were to Luther. It is the property of every Hero, in every time, in every place and situation, that he come back to reality; that he stand upon things, and not shows of things. According as he loves, and venerates, articulately or with deep speechless thought, the awful realities of things, so will the hollow shows of things, however regular, decorous, accredited by Koreishes or Conclaves, be intolerable and detestable to him. Protestantism too is the work of a Prophet: the prophet-work of that sixteenth century. The first stroke of honest demolition to an ancient thing grown false and idolatrous; preparatory afar off to a new thing, which shall be true, and authentically divine!—
I see Luther as a Breaker of Idols, just like any other Prophet. The wooden gods of the 354Koreish, made from wood and beeswax, were no more despised by Mahomet than Tetzel’s Pardons of Sin, crafted from sheepskin and ink, were to Luther. Every Hero, in any time, place, and situation, has to connect back to reality; they need to stand on solid ground, not just illusions. Depending on how much they love and respect the harsh truths of existence, the empty appearances of things—no matter how orderly, respectable, or endorsed by Koreishes or Conclaves—will be unbearable and loathsome to them. Protestantism too is the work of a Prophet: the prophetic work of the sixteenth century. It marks the first honest act of tearing down an ancient belief that had become false and idolatrous; it paves the way for something new that will be true and genuinely divine!
At first view it might seem as if Protestantism were entirely destructive to this that we call Hero-worship, and represent as the basis of all possible good, religious or social, for mankind. One often hears it said that Protestantism introduced a new era, radically different from any the world had ever seen before: the era of ‘private judgment,’ as they call it. By this revolt against the Pope, every man became his own Pope; and learnt, among other things, that he must never trust any Pope, or spiritual Hero-captain, any more! Whereby, is not spiritual union, all hierarchy and subordination among men, henceforth an impossibility? So we hear it said.—Now I need not deny that Protestantism was a revolt against spiritual sovereignties, Popes and much else. Nay I will grant that English Puritanism, revolt against earthly sovereignties, was the second act of it; that the enormous French Revolution itself was the third act, whereby all sovereignties earthly and spiritual were, as might seem, abolished or made sure of abolition. Protestantism is the grand root from which our whole subsequent European History branches out. For the spiritual will always body itself forth in the temporal history of men; the spiritual is the beginning of the temporal. And now, sure enough, the cry is everywhere for Liberty and Equality, Independence and so forth: instead of Kings, Ballot-boxes and 355Electoral suffrages; it seems made out that any Hero-sovereign, or loyal obedience of men to a man, in things temporal or things spiritual, has passed away forever from the world. I should despair of the world altogether, if so. One of my deepest convictions is, that it is not so. Without sovereigns, true sovereigns, temporal and spiritual, I see nothing possible but an anarchy: the hatefulest of things. But I find Protestantism, whatever anarchic democracy it have produced, to be the beginning of new genuine sovereignty and order. I find it to be a revolt against false sovereigns; the painful but indispensable first preparative for true sovereigns getting place among us! This is worth explaining a little.
At first glance, it might seem like Protestantism completely destroys what we call hero-worship, which we see as the foundation of all potential good, whether religious or social, for humanity. People often say that Protestantism kicked off a new era, one that was fundamentally different from anything the world had experienced before: the era of "private judgment." By challenging the Pope, every individual became their own Pope and learned, among other things, that they could never trust any Pope or spiritual leader again! This raises the question: is spiritual unity, along with all hierarchy and subordination among people, now impossible? That's what we often hear. Now, I won’t deny that Protestantism was a rebellion against spiritual authorities, Popes, and much more. In fact, I’ll accept that English Puritanism, which was a rebellion against earthly powers, was a second act; that the massive French Revolution was a third act that seemed to abolish all earthly and spiritual authorities. Protestantism is the main root from which our entire subsequent European history branches out. The spiritual will always manifest itself in the temporal history of humanity; the spiritual is the starting point of the temporal. And sure enough, the demand for liberty, equality, independence, and so on, is everywhere: instead of kings, we have ballot boxes and 355 electoral votes; it seems as if any hero-sovereign or the loyalty of people to a person, in both temporal or spiritual matters, has disappeared forever. I would lose all hope for the world if that were true. One of my strongest beliefs is that it’s not the case. Without true sovereigns, both temporal and spiritual, I see nothing but chaos: the most detestable of situations. However, I view Protestantism, despite the anarchic democracy it has fostered, as the starting point for new genuine sovereignty and order. I see it as a rebellion against false sovereigns; a painful but necessary first step toward allowing true sovereigns to take their rightful place among us! This is worth explaining further.
Let us remark, therefore, in the first place, that this of ‘private judgment’ is, at bottom, not a new thing in the world, but only new at that epoch of the world. There is nothing generically new or peculiar in the Reformation; it was a return to Truth and Reality in opposition to Falsehood and Semblance, as all kinds of Improvement and genuine Teaching are and have been. Liberty of private judgment, if we will consider it, must at all times have existed in the world. Dante had not put-out his eyes, or tied shackles on himself; he was at home in that Catholicism of his, a free-seeing soul in it, if many a poor Hogstraten, Tetzel and Dr. Eck had now become slaves in it. Liberty of judgment? No iron chain, or outward force of any kind, could ever compel the soul of a man to believe or to disbelieve: it is his own indefeasible light, that judgment of his; he will reign, and believe there, by the grace of God alone! The sorriest sophistical Bellarmine, preaching sightless faith and passive obedience, must first, by some kind of conviction, have abdicated his right to be convinced. His ‘private judgment’ indicated that, as the advisablest step he could take. The right of private judgment will subsist, in full force, wherever true men subsist. A true man believes with his whole judgment, with all the illumination and discernment that is in him, and has always so believed. A false man, only struggling to ‘believe that he believes,’ will naturally manage it in some other way. Protestantism 356said to this latter, Woe! and to the former, Well done! At bottom, it was no new saying; it was a return to all old sayings that ever had been said. Be genuine, be sincere: that was, once more, the meaning of it. Mahomet believed with his whole mind; Odin with his whole mind,—he, and all true Followers of Odinism. They, by their private judgment, had ‘judged’—so.
Let’s note, first of all, that this concept of ‘private judgment’ is not something brand new in the world; it was just new for that time period. There’s nothing fundamentally new or unique about the Reformation; it was a return to Truth and Reality in contrast to Falsehood and Appearance, just like all forms of Improvement and genuine Teaching have been. If we think about it, liberty of private judgment must have always existed in the world. Dante didn’t blind himself or put himself in chains; he was secure in his Catholicism, a free-thinking soul within it, even if many, like Hogstraten, Tetzel, and Dr. Eck, became trapped in it. Liberty of judgment? No iron chain or external force could ever make a person believe or disbelieve anything. It's his own unbreakable light, his judgment; he will reign and believe there, solely by the grace of God! The most pitiful sophistical Bellarmine, preaching blind faith and passive obedience, must have first, through some kind of conviction, given up his right to be convinced. His ‘private judgment’ indicated that this was the most sensible step he could take. The right of private judgment will thrive wherever true individuals exist. A true individual believes with all of their judgment, with every bit of clarity and insight they have, and has always believed that way. A false individual, just struggling to ‘believe that they believe,’ will find a way to manage it some other way. Protestantism 356 said to this latter group, Woe! and to the former, Well done! Ultimately, it wasn’t a new idea; it was a return to all the old ideas that had ever been expressed. Be genuine, be sincere: that was the message once again. Muhammad believed with his whole mind; Odin did the same—he and all true Followers of Odinism. They, through their private judgment, had ‘judged’—so.
And now, I venture to assert, that the exercise of private judgment, faithfully gone about, does by no means necessarily end in selfish independence, isolation; but rather ends necessarily in the opposite of that. It is not honest inquiry that makes anarchy; but it is error, insincerity, half-belief and untruth that make it. A man protesting against error is on the way towards uniting himself with all men that believe in truth. There is no communion possible among men who believe only in hearsays. The heart of each is lying dead; has no power of sympathy even with things,—or he would believe them and not hearsays. No sympathy even with things; how much less with his fellow-men! He cannot unite with men; he is an anarchic man. Only in a world of sincere men is unity possible;—and there, in the longrun, it is as good as certain.
And now, I want to say that the exercise of private judgment, when done sincerely, does not inevitably lead to selfish independence or isolation; instead, it leads to the opposite. It’s not honest questioning that creates chaos; rather, it’s error, insincerity, half-belief, and untruth that do. A person rejecting error is on the path to connecting with all those who believe in truth. There can be no genuine connection among those who only believe in rumors. Each person's heart is lifeless; they have no capacity for empathy even with things—otherwise, they would believe in them and not just in hearsay. If they can’t empathize even with things, how much less can they empathize with their fellow humans? They cannot connect with others; they are an anarchic person. Unity is only possible in a world of sincere people; and there, over time, it is as good as certain.
For observe one thing, a thing too often left out of view, or rather altogether lost sight of, in this controversy: That it is not necessary a man should himself have discovered the truth he is to believe in, and never so sincerely to believe in. A Great Man, we said, was always sincere, as the first condition of him. But a man need not be great in order to be sincere; that is not the necessity of Nature and all Time, but only of certain corrupt unfortunate epochs of Time. A man can believe, and make his own, in the most genuine way, what he has received from another;—and with boundless gratitude to that other! The merit of originality is not novelty; it is sincerity. The believing man is the original man; whatsoever he believes, he believes it for himself, not for another. Every son of Adam can become a sincere man, an original man, in this sense; no mortal is doomed to be an insincere man. Whole ages, what we call ages of Faith, are 357original; all men in them, or the most of men in them, sincere. These are the great and fruitful ages: every worker, in all spheres, is a worker not on semblance but on substance; every work issues in a result: the general sum of such work is great; for all of it, as genuine, tends towards one goal; all of it is additive, none of it subtractive. There is true union, true kingship, loyalty, all true and blessed things, so far as the poor Earth can produce blessedness for men.
For one thing, let's note something that’s often overlooked or completely forgotten in this debate: it's not necessary for a person to have discovered the truth they believe in, or to believe in it with all their sincerity. We said a Great Man is always sincere, which is a fundamental trait. But a person doesn’t have to be great to be sincere; that expectation only applies to certain unfortunate periods in history. A person can genuinely believe in and embrace what they’ve received from someone else—with immense gratitude! The value of originality isn’t in being novel; it’s in being sincere. The person who believes is the original one; whatever they believe, they do it for themselves, not for anyone else. Every descendant of Adam can be a sincere person, an original person, in this way; no one is fated to be insincere. Entire eras, what we call ages of Faith, are 357original; most of the people in those times are sincere. These are the great and productive ages: every worker, in all fields, is engaging with reality rather than mere appearance; every effort leads to a result. The total of such efforts is substantial; all of it, being genuine, aims toward one purpose; all of it is additive, none of it subtractive. There is real unity, true kinship, loyalty, and all other genuine and blessed things, as far as this poor Earth can offer happiness to people.
Hero-worship? Ah me, that a man be self-subsistent, original, true, or what we call it, is surely the farthest in the world from indisposing him to reverence and believe other men’s truth! It only disposes, necessitates and invincibly compels him to disbelieve other men’s dead formulas, hearsays and untruths. A man embraces truth with his eyes open, and because his eyes are open: does he need to shut them before he can love his Teacher of truth? He alone can love, with a right gratitude and genuine loyalty of soul, the Hero-Teacher who has delivered him out of darkness into light. Is not such a one a true Hero and Serpent-queller; worthy of all reverence! The black monster, Falsehood, our one enemy in this world, lies prostrate by his valour; it was he that conquered the world for us!—See, accordingly, was not Luther himself reverenced as a true Pope, or Spiritual Father, being verily such? Napoleon, from amid boundless revolt of Sansculottism, became a King. Hero-worship never dies, nor can die. Loyalty and Sovereignty are everlasting in the world:—and there is this in them, that they are grounded not on garnitures and semblances, but on realities and sincerities. Not by shutting your eyes, your ‘private judgment;’ no, but by opening them, and by having something to see! Luther’s message was deposition and abolition to all false Popes and Potentates, but life and strength, though afar off, to new genuine ones.
Hero-worship? Oh, how a man can be independent, original, and true is definitely the furthest thing from making him unwilling to respect and trust in the truths of others! It actually leads him to dismiss the falsehoods, hearsays, and untruths of others. A man embraces truth with his eyes wide open, and just because his eyes are open, does he need to close them to love his Teacher of truth? Only he can love, with true gratitude and genuine loyalty, the Hero-Teacher who has guided him from darkness into light. Isn’t such a person a real Hero and a conqueror of lies, deserving all our respect? The dark monster, Falsehood, our only enemy in this world, lies defeated by his courage; it was he who won the world for us!—Look, wasn’t Luther himself seen as a true Pope or Spiritual Father, indeed being such? Napoleon, emerging from the chaos of Sansculottism, became a King. Hero-worship never dies and cannot die. Loyalty and Sovereignty are eternal in this world:—and they are based not on decorations and appearances, but on true substance and honesty. Not by closing your eyes, your ‘private judgment;’ no, but by opening them and having something to see! Luther’s message was about the removal and abolition of all false Popes and rulers, but it also brought life and strength, even from a distance, to new genuine ones.
All this of Liberty and Equality, Electoral suffrages, Independence and so forth, we will take, therefore, to be a temporary phenomenon, by no means a final one. Though likely to last a long time, with sad enough embroilments for us all, we must welcome it, as the penalty of sins that are past, the pledge of inestimable benefits 358that are coming. In all ways, it behoved men to quit simulacra and return to fact; cost what it might, that did behove to be done. With spurious Popes, and Believers having no private judgment,—quacks pretending to command over dupes,—what can you do? Misery and mischief only. You cannot make an association out of insincere men; you cannot build an edifice except by plummet and level,—at right-angles to one another! In all this wild revolutionary work, from Protestantism downwards, I see the blessedest result preparing itself: not abolition of Hero-worship, but rather what I would call a whole World of Heroes. If Hero mean sincere man, why may not every one of us be a Hero? A world all sincere, a believing world: the like has been; the like will again be,—cannot help being. That were the right sort of Worshippers for Heroes: never could the truly Better be so reverenced as where all were True and Good!—But we must hasten to Luther and his Life.
All this talk about Liberty and Equality, voting rights, Independence, and so on, we will see as a temporary situation, definitely not a final one. Although it’s likely to stick around for a long time, with enough troubles for all of us, we must embrace it as the price we pay for past mistakes and a promise of incredible benefits to come. In every way, it's important for people to abandon illusions and return to reality; whatever it takes, that must be done. With fake leaders and followers who have no independent thinking—charlatans pretending to have control over their gullible followers—what can you accomplish? Only misery and chaos. You can't create a community with insincere people; you can't build a structure without a proper foundation—everything needs to be square and aligned! In all this chaotic revolutionary effort, from Protestantism onward, I see the most amazing outcome taking shape: not the end of idolizing great individuals, but rather, what I would call a whole World of Heroes. If a Hero means a sincere person, why can't each one of us be a Hero? A world full of sincerity, a believing world: we've seen it before; it will happen again—it has to happen. That would be the right kind of worshippers for Heroes: genuine goodness could never be truly revered where everyone was not True and Good!—But we must move on to Luther and his Life.
Luther’s birthplace was Eisleben in Saxony; he came into the world there on the 10th of November 1483. It was an accident that gave this honour to Eisleben. His parents, poor mine-labourers in a village of that region, named Mohra, had gone to the Eisleben Winter-Fair: in the tumult of this scene the Frau Luther was taken with travail, found refuge in some poor house there, and the boy she bore was named Martin Luther. Strange enough to reflect upon it. This poor Frau Luther, she had gone with her husband to make her small merchandisings; perhaps to sell the lock of yarn she had been spinning, to buy the small winter-necessaries for her narrow hut or household; in the whole world, that day, there was not a more entirely unimportant-looking pair of people than this Miner and his Wife. And yet what were all Emperors, Popes and Potentates, in comparison? There was born here, once more, a Mighty Man; whose light was to flame as the beacon over long centuries and epochs of the world; the whole world and its history was waiting for this man. It is strange, it is great. It leads us back to another Birth-hour, in a still meaner environment, Eighteen 359Hundred years ago,—of which it is fit that we say nothing, that we think only in silence; for what words are there! The Age of Miracles past? The Age of Miracles is forever here!—
Luther was born in Eisleben, Saxony, on November 10, 1483. It was purely by chance that Eisleben received this honor. His parents, who were poor miners from a nearby village called Mohra, had gone to the Eisleben Winter Fair. Amidst the chaos of the event, Frau Luther went into labor and found shelter in a modest house, where she gave birth to a son named Martin Luther. It’s interesting to think about. This poor Frau Luther had accompanied her husband to sell some small goods; perhaps she was trying to sell a bit of yarn she had spun to buy some winter essentials for their tiny home. On that day, there wasn’t a pair of people in the world who appeared more ordinary than this miner and his wife. Yet, how do they compare to all the emperors, popes, and powerful figures? A great man was born here once again, whose influence would shine like a beacon for centuries through different eras. The whole world and its history were waiting for him. It’s remarkable, it’s profound. It takes us back to another birth, in an even humbler setting, 180 years prior—of which we should say nothing and only think in silence; for what words can capture it? Is the Age of Miracles over? The Age of Miracles is always present!—
I find it altogether suitable to Luther’s function in this Earth, and doubtless wisely ordered to that end by the Providence presiding over him and us and all things, that he was born poor, and brought-up poor, one of the poorest of men. He had to beg, as the schoolchildren in those times did; singing for alms and bread, from door to door. Hardship, rigorous Necessity was the poor boy’s companion; no man nor no thing would put-on a false face to flatter Martin Luther. Among things, not among the shows of things, had he to grow. A boy of rude figure, yet with weak health, with his large greedy soul, full of all faculty and sensibility, he suffered greatly. But it was his task to get acquainted with realities, and keep acquainted with them, at whatever cost: his task was to bring the whole world back to reality, for it had dwelt too long with semblance! A youth nursed-up in wintry whirlwinds, in desolate darkness and difficulty, that he may step-forth at last from his stormy Scandinavia, strong as a true man, as a god: a Christian Odin,—a right Thor once more, with his thunder-hammer, to smite asunder ugly enough Jötuns and Giant-monsters!
I think it’s completely fitting for Luther's role in this world, and undoubtedly arranged wisely by the Providence watching over him, us, and everything, that he was born into poverty and raised in hardship, one of the poorest of men. He had to beg, just like schoolchildren did back then; singing for food and money from house to house. Struggle and tough necessity were the poor boy's constant companions; no man or thing would pretend to flatter Martin Luther. He had to grow among real things, not just appearances. A boy with a rough appearance and poor health, yet with a large, eager soul, full of talent and sensitivity, he suffered greatly. But his mission was to get to know realities and maintain that connection at any cost: his task was to bring the whole world back to what’s real, as it had lingered too long in illusion! A youth raised amidst winter storms, in bleak darkness and challenges, so that he could finally emerge from his turbulent Scandinavia, strong as a true man, as a god: a Christian Odin—once again a real Thor with his thunder hammer, ready to smash apart the hideous Jötuns and giant monsters!
Perhaps the turning incident of his life, we may fancy, was that death of his friend Alexis, by lightning, at the gate of Erfurt. Luther had struggled-up through boyhood, better and worse; displaying, in spite of all hindrances, the largest intellect, eager to learn: his father judging doubtless that he might promote himself in the world, set him upon the study of Law. This was the path to rise; Luther, with little will in it either way, had consented: he was now nineteen years of age. Alexis and he had been to see the old Luther people at Mansfeldt; were got back again near Erfurt, when a thunderstorm came on; the bolt struck Alexis, he fell dead at Luther’s feet. What is this Life of ours?—gone in a moment, burnt-up like a scroll, into the blank Eternity! What are all earthly preferments, Chancellorships, Kingships? They lie shrunk together—there! 360The Earth has opened on them; in a moment they are not, and Eternity is. Luther, struck to the heart, determined to devote himself to God and God’s service alone. In spite of all dissuasions from his father and others, he became a Monk in the Augustine Convent at Erfurt.
Perhaps the defining moment of his life was the death of his friend Alexis, who was struck by lightning at the gate of Erfurt. Luther had navigated through his childhood, facing ups and downs, showing, despite all obstacles, a remarkable intellect and a strong desire to learn. His father, believing that he could succeed in the world, pushed him to study Law. This was seen as a pathway to success; Luther, having little desire either way, agreed to it at the age of nineteen. He and Alexis had visited the old Luther family in Mansfeldt and were returning near Erfurt when a thunderstorm hit. A lightning strike hit Alexis, and he fell dead at Luther’s feet. What is this life of ours?—gone in an instant, burned up like a scroll, into the void of Eternity! What do all earthly achievements, Chancellorships, and Kingships matter? They are all reduced to nothing—there! 360The Earth has swallowed them; in an instant, they cease to exist while Eternity remains. Deeply affected, Luther resolved to dedicate himself to God and His service alone. Despite all the discouragements from his father and others, he became a monk in the Augustine Convent at Erfurt.
This was probably the first light-point in the history of Luther, his purer will now first decisively uttering itself; but, for the present, it was still as one light-point in an element all of darkness. He says he was a pious monk, ich bin ein frommer Mönch gewesen; faithfully, painfully struggling to work-out the truth of this high act of his; but it was to little purpose. His misery had not lessened; had rather, as it were, increased into infinitude. The drudgeries he had to do, as novice in his Convent, all sorts of slave-work, were not his grievance: the deep earnest soul of the man had fallen into all manner of black scruples, dubitations; he believed himself likely to die soon, and far worse than die. One hears with a new interest for poor Luther that, at this time, he lived in terror of the unspeakable misery; fancied that he was doomed to eternal reprobation. Was it not the humble sincere nature of the man? What was he, that he should be raised to Heaven! He that had known only misery, and mean slavery: the news was too blessed to be credible. It could not become clear to him how, by fasts, vigils, formalities and mass-work, a man’s soul could be saved. He fell into the blackest wretchedness; had to wander staggering as on the verge of bottomless Despair.
This was probably the first moment of clarity in Luther's life, when his true intentions began to express themselves. However, at that time, it was still just one glimmer of light in a sea of darkness. He stated he was a devout monk, ich bin ein frommer Mönch gewesen; diligently and painfully trying to understand the truth behind his significant actions, but it felt like a futile effort. His suffering had not decreased; rather, it seemed to have grown infinitely worse. The hard work he had to do as a novice in his convent, all sorts of menial tasks, was not his main issue: the deeply earnest nature of the man had become plagued by all kinds of dark doubts and uncertainties; he believed he might soon die, and even worse than that. One learns with newfound sympathy for poor Luther that during this time, he lived in fear of unimaginable suffering, convinced that he was doomed to eternal damnation. Was it not the humble and sincere essence of the man? Who was he to be welcomed into Heaven! He who had only experienced misery and servitude: the news seemed too good to be true. It was unclear to him how, through fasting, sleepless nights, rituals, and mass, a person's soul could be saved. He sank into profound despair, wandering as if teetering on the edge of bottomless sorrow.
It must have been a most blessed discovery, that of an old Latin Bible which he found in the Erfurt Library about this time. He had never seen the Book before. It taught him another lesson than that of fasts and vigils. A brother monk too, of pious experience, was helpful. Luther learned now that a man was saved not by singing masses, but by the infinite grace of God: a more credible hypothesis. He gradually got himself founded, as on the rock. No wonder he should venerate the Bible, which had brought this blessed help to him. He prized it as the Word of the Highest must be prized 361by such a man. He determined to hold by that; as through life and to death he firmly did.
It must have been a truly amazing discovery when he found an old Latin Bible in the Erfurt Library around this time. He had never seen this book before. It taught him something beyond just fasting and keeping vigil. A fellow monk, who had a lot of spiritual experience, was also very helpful. Luther realized that a person is saved not by performing masses, but by the infinite grace of God—a much more believable idea. He gradually established himself on this solid foundation. It makes sense that he should hold the Bible in such high regard, as it brought him this precious help. He valued it as the Word of the Highest should be valued by someone like him. He decided to stick with this belief, and throughout his life and into death, he truly did. 361
This, then, is his deliverance from darkness, his final triumph over darkness, what we call his conversion; for himself the most important of all epochs. That he should now grow daily in peace and clearness; that, unfolding now the great talents and virtues implanted in him, he should rise to importance in his Convent, in his country, and be found more and more useful in all honest business of life, is a natural result. He was sent on missions by his Augustine Order, as a man of talent and fidelity fit to do their business well: the Elector of Saxony, Friedrich, named the Wise, a truly wise and just prince, had cast his eye on him as a valuable person; made him Professor in his new University of Wittenberg, Preacher too at Wittenberg; in both which capacities, as in all duties he did, this Luther, in the peaceable sphere of common life, was gaining more and more esteem with all good men.
This is his escape from darkness, his ultimate victory over it, what we call his conversion; for him, the most significant moment of his life. That he would now grow daily in peace and clarity; that, revealing the great talents and virtues within him, he would rise to prominence in his Convent, in his country, and become increasingly useful in all honest endeavors, is a natural outcome. He was sent on missions by his Augustine Order, regarded as a talented and trustworthy person fit to carry out their work: the Elector of Saxony, Friedrich, known as the Wise, a genuinely wise and just ruler, recognized his value; he appointed him as a Professor at the new University of Wittenberg and as a Preacher there as well. In both roles, as in all his duties, Luther was gaining more and more respect among all good people in the peaceful realm of everyday life.
It was in his twenty-seventh year that he first saw Rome; being sent thither, as I said, on mission from his Convent. Pope Julius the Second, and what was going-on at Rome, must have filled the mind of Luther with amazement. He had come as to the Sacred City, throne of God’s Highpriest on Earth; and he found it—what we know! Many thoughts it must have given the man; many which we have no record of, which perhaps he did not himself know how to utter. This Rome, this scene of false priests, clothed not in the beauty of holiness, but in far other vesture, is false: but what is it to Luther? A mean man he, how shall he reform a world? That was far from his thoughts. A humble, solitary man, why should he at all meddle with the world? It was the task of quite higher men than he. His business was to guide his own footsteps wisely through the world. Let him do his own obscure duty in it well; the rest, horrible and dismal as it looks, is in God’s hand, not in his.
It was in his twenty-seventh year that he first saw Rome; he was sent there, as I mentioned, on a mission from his Convent. Pope Julius the Second and everything happening in Rome must have filled Luther's mind with wonder. He had come to the Holy City, the throne of God’s High Priest on Earth; and he found it—well, we know! It must have given him many thoughts; many of which we have no record of, and perhaps he didn’t even know how to express them. This Rome, this scene of false priests, not dressed in the beauty of holiness but in very different attire, is false: but what does it matter to Luther? He is just an ordinary man; how can he reform the world? That wasn’t even on his mind. A humble, solitary man, why should he interfere with the world at all? It was the job of much greater men than he. His responsibility was to wisely guide his own path through the world. Let him do his own small duty well; the rest, as horrible and dismal as it appears, is in God’s hands, not his.
It is curious to reflect what might have been the issue, had Roman Popery happened to pass this Luther by; to go on in its great wasteful orbit, and not come athwart his little path, and force him to assault it! 362Conceivable enough that, in this case, he might have held his peace about the abuses of Rome; left Providence, and God on high, to deal with them! A modest quiet man; not prompt he to attack irreverently persons in authority. His clear task, as I say, was to do his own duty; to walk wisely in this world of confused wickedness, and save his own soul alive. But the Roman Highpriesthood did come athwart him: afar off at Wittenberg he, Luther, could not get lived in honesty for it; he remonstrated, resisted, came to extremity; was struck-at, struck again, and so it came to wager of battle between them! This is worth attending to in Luther’s history. Perhaps no man of so humble, peaceable a disposition ever filled the world with contention. We cannot but see that he would have loved privacy, quiet diligence in the shade; that it was against his will he ever became a notoriety. Notoriety: what would that do for him? The goal of his march through this world was the Infinite Heaven; an indubitable goal for him: in a few years, he should either have attained that, or lost it forever! We will say nothing at all, I think, of that sorrowfulest of theories, of its being some mean shopkeeper grudge, of the Augustine Monk against the Dominican, that first kindled the wrath of Luther, and produced the Protestant Reformation. We will say to the people who maintain it, if indeed any such exist now: Get first into the sphere of thought by which it is so much as possible to judge of Luther, or of any man like Luther, otherwise than distractedly; we may then begin arguing with you.
It's interesting to think about what could have happened if Roman Catholicism had completely ignored Luther. If it had continued on its path without intersecting his life, he might have stayed silent about Rome's abuses, leaving it all to God to handle. He was a modest, quiet man and not one to disrespect authority. His goal was simple: to do his own duty, navigate through a confusing and corrupt world, and save his own soul. However, the Roman clergy did confront him; from afar in Wittenberg, Luther couldn't ignore it and ended up opposing it. He resisted and faced serious consequences, leading to a battle between them. This is an important part of Luther’s story. It’s hard to find someone so humble and peaceful who nonetheless sparked so much conflict. We can see he preferred privacy and hard work in the background; he never wanted to be in the spotlight. What would notoriety do for him? His aim was the Infinite Heaven, a clear goal for him: in a few years, he would either achieve it or lose it forever! We won't dwell on that sad theory that suggests his anger toward the Dominican order was just a petty grudge, claiming that this began the Protestant Reformation. To those who believe that, if any still do: try to understand the mindset needed to judge Luther or anyone like him fairly, and then we can start a meaningful discussion.
The Monk Tetzel, sent out carelessly in the way of trade, by Leo Tenth,—who merely wanted to raise a little money, and for the rest seems to have been a Pagan rather than a Christian, so far as he was anything,—arrived at Wittenberg, and drove his scandalous trade there. Luther’s flock bought Indulgences: in the confessional of his Church, people pleaded to him that they had already got their sins pardoned. Luther, if he would not be found wanting at his own post, a false sluggard and coward at the very centre of the little space of ground that was his own and no other man’s, had to step-forth against Indulgences, and declare aloud 363that they were a futility and sorrowful mockery, that no man’s sins could be pardoned by them. It was the beginning of the whole Reformation. We know how it went; forward from this first public challenge of Tetzel, on the last day of October 1517, through remonstrance and argument;—spreading ever wider, rising ever higher; till it became unquenchable, and enveloped all the world. Luther’s heart’s-desire was to have this grief and other griefs amended; his thought was still far other than that of introducing separation in the Church, or revolting against the Pope, Father of Christendom.—The elegant Pagan Pope cared little about this Monk and his doctrines; wished, however, to have done with the noise of him: in a space of some three years, having tried various softer methods, he thought good to end it by fire. He dooms the Monk’s writings to be burnt by the hangman, and his body to be sent bound to Rome,—probably for a similar purpose. It was the way they had ended with Huss, with Jerome, the century before. A short argument, fire. Poor Huss: he came to that Constance Council, with all imaginable promises and safe-conducts; an earnest, not rebellious kind of man: they laid him instantly in a stone dungeon ‘three-feet wide, six-feet high, seven-feet long;’ burnt the true voice of him out of this world; choked it in smoke and fire. That was not well done!
The monk Tetzel, recklessly sent out to make money by Leo Tenth—who seemed more like a pagan than a Christian, if he was anything—arrived in Wittenberg and started his scandalous business there. Luther’s followers bought indulgences; in his church's confessional, people told him they had already had their sins forgiven. Luther, if he didn’t want to be seen as a lazy coward in his own territory, had to stand up against indulgences and openly declare that they were a useless and sorrowful mockery, that no one’s sins could be forgiven by them. This was the start of the entire Reformation. We know how it played out; from this first public challenge to Tetzel on the last day of October 1517, through protests and debates; spreading wider and gaining momentum until it became unstoppable and reached all over the world. Luther's real desire was to fix this issue and others like it; he had no intention of causing a split in the Church or rebelling against the Pope, the Father of Christendom. The sophisticated pagan pope didn’t care much about this monk and his beliefs; however, he wanted to silence him. After about three years of trying various gentler approaches, he decided to deal with it through fire. He condemned the monk’s writings to be burned by the executioner, and ordered that his body be sent bound to Rome—likely for the same fate. This was how they dealt with Huss and Jerome a century earlier. A simple argument: fire. Poor Huss: he came to the Council of Constance with all kinds of promises and safe-passes; he was a sincere, not rebellious man: but they quickly locked him up in a stone dungeon ‘three-feet wide, six-feet high, seven-feet long;’ and burned the truth out of this world, choking it in smoke and flames. That was not right!
I, for one, pardon Luther for now altogether revolting against the Pope. The elegant Pagan, by this fire-decree of his, had kindled into noble just wrath the bravest heart then living in this world. The bravest, if also one of the humblest, peaceablest; it was now kindled. These words of mine, words of truth and soberness, aiming faithfully, as human inability would allow, to promote God’s truth on Earth, and save men’s souls, you, God’s vicegerent on earth, answer them by the hangman and fire? You will burn me and them, for answer to the God’s-message they strove to bring you? You are not God’s vicegerent; you are another’s than his, I think I take your Bull, as an emparchmented Lie, and burn it. You will do what you see good next: this is what I do.—It was on the 10th of 364December 1520, three years after the beginning of the business, that Luther, ‘with a great concourse of people,’ took this indignant step of burning the Pope’s fire-decree ‘at the Elster-Gate of Wittenberg.’ Wittenberg looked on ‘with shoutings;’ the whole world was looking on. The Pope should not have provoked that ‘shout’! It was the shout of the awakening of nations. The quiet German heart, modest, patient of much, had at length got more than it could bear. Formulism, Pagan Popeism, and other Falsehood and corrupt Semblance had ruled long enough: and here once more was a man found who durst tell all men that God’s world stood not on semblances but on realities; that Life was a truth, and not a lie!
I, for one, forgive Luther for completely rebelling against the Pope. This refined individual, with his fiery decree, had ignited righteous anger in the bravest heart alive at that time. The bravest, who was also humble and peaceful; that fire was now lit. My words, grounded in truth and sincerity, aim to genuinely promote God’s truth on Earth and save people's souls. In response, you, God’s representative on Earth, will answer by resorting to execution and burning? You will burn me and others for trying to bring you God’s message? You are not God’s representative; you are someone else’s, and I see your Bull as a crafted Lie, which I will burn it. You will do what seems right to you next; this is what I will do. It was on December 10, 1520, three years after this whole situation started, that Luther, ‘with a large crowd of people,’ took this bold step of burning the Pope’s fiery decree ‘at the Elster Gate of Wittenberg.’ Wittenberg watched ‘with cheers;’ the whole world was watching. The Pope should not have triggered that ‘cheer’! It was the cheer signaling the awakening of nations. The quiet German spirit, modest and patient for so long, had finally reached its limit. Formalism, Pagan Popeism, and other falsehoods and corrupt appearances had dominated for long enough: and here once again was a man who dared to tell everyone that God’s world was based on realities, not appearances; that life was a truth, not a lie!
At bottom, as was said above, we are to consider Luther as a Prophet Idol-breaker; a bringer-back of men to reality. It is the function of great men and teachers. Mahomet said, These idols of yours are wood; you put wax and oil on them, the flies stick on them: they are not God, I tell you, they are black wood! Luther said to the Pope, This thing of yours that you call a Pardon of Sins, it is a bit of rag-paper with ink. It is nothing else; it, and so much like it, is nothing else. God alone can pardon sins. Popeship, spiritual Fatherhood of God’s Church, is that a vain semblance, of cloth and parchment? It is an awful fact. God’s Church is not a semblance, Heaven and Hell are not semblances. I stand on this, since you drive me to it. Standing on this, I a poor German monk am stronger than you all. I stand solitary, friendless, but on God’s Truth; you with your tiaras, triple-hats, with your treasuries and armories, thunders spiritual and temporal, stand on the Devil’s Lie, and are not so strong!—
At the core, as mentioned earlier, we need to view Luther as a prophet who destroys idols; someone who brings people back to reality. This is the role of great individuals and teachers. Mohammad said, "These idols you have are just wood; you cover them in wax and oil, and flies stick to them: they are not God, I’m telling you, they are just dark wood!" Luther told the Pope, "This thing you call a Pardon of Sins is just a piece of rag paper with ink on it. It means nothing; it is exactly that—nothing else. Only God can forgive sins. The papacy, the spiritual fatherhood of God’s Church—are those just empty appearances, made of cloth and parchment? It’s a serious reality. God’s Church is not an illusion, and Heaven and Hell are not illusions. I hold firm to this, since you push me to do so. Holding firm to this, I, a poor German monk, am stronger than all of you. I might be alone and friendless, but I stand on God’s Truth; while you, with your tiaras, triple crowns, your treasures and armories, your spiritual and worldly thunder, stand on the Devil’s Lie and are not as strong!"
The Diet of Worms, Luther’s appearance there on the 17th of April 1521, may be considered as the greatest scene in Modern European History; the point, indeed, from which the whole subsequent history of civilisation takes its rise. After multiplied negotiations, disputations, it had come to this. The young Emperor Charles Fifth, with all the Princes of Germany, Papal nuncios, dignitaries spiritual and temporal, are assembled there: Luther is to appear and answer for himself, whether he 365will recant or not. The world’s pomp and power sits there on this hand: on that, stands-up for God’s Truth, one man, the poor miner Hans Luther’s Son. Friends had reminded him of Huss, advised him not to go; he would not be advised. A large company of friends rode-out to meet him, with still more earnest warnings; he answered, “Were there as many Devils in Worms as there are roof-tiles, I would on.” The people, on the morrow, as he went to the Hall of the Diet, crowded the windows and housetops, some of them calling out to him, in solemn words, not to recant: “Whosoever denieth me before men!” they cried to him,—as in a kind of solemn petition and adjuration. Was it not in reality our petition too, the petition of the whole world, lying in dark bondage of soul, paralysed under a black spectral Nightmare and triple-hatted Chimera, calling itself Father in God, and what not: “Free us; it rests with thee; desert us not!”
The Diet of Worms, where Luther appeared on April 17, 1521, is considered one of the most significant moments in Modern European History; it's the point from which the entire subsequent history of civilization begins. After numerous negotiations and debates, it all came down to this. The young Emperor Charles V, along with all the Princes of Germany, Papal envoys, and various spiritual and temporal dignitaries, were gathered: Luther was to appear and defend himself, deciding whether he would recant or not. On one side was the world's power and prestige; on the other stood one man, Hans Luther's Son, standing up for God's Truth. Friends had warned him about Huss and advised him against going; he refused to listen. A large group of friends rode out to meet him, offering even more serious warnings; he replied, “Even if there were as many devils in Worms as there are roof tiles, I would go on.” The next day, as he walked to the Hall of the Diet, people crowded the windows and rooftops, some calling out to him solemnly not to recant: “Whoever denies me before men!” they urged him, in a kind of serious plea and appeal. Was this not truly our plea too, the plea of the whole world, trapped in a dark bondage of the soul, paralyzed under a grim spectral Nightmare and a triple-hatted Chimera claiming to be Father in God, and whatnot: “Free us; it rests with you; don’t abandon us!”
Luther did not desert us. His speech, of two hours, distinguished itself by its respectful, wise and honest tone; submissive to whatsoever could lawfully claim submission, not submissive to any more than that. His writings, he said, were partly his own, partly derived from the Word of God. As to what was his own, human infirmity entered into it; unguarded anger, blindness, many things doubtless which it were a blessing for him could he abolish altogether. But as to what stood on sound truth and the Word of God, he could not recant it. How could he? “Confute me,” he concluded, “by proofs of Scripture, or else by plain just arguments: I cannot recant otherwise. For it is neither safe nor prudent to do ought against conscience. Here stand I; I can do no other: God assist me!”—It is, as we say, the greatest moment in the Modern History of Men. English Puritanism, England and its Parliaments, Americas, and vast work these two centuries; French Revolution, Europe and its work everywhere at present: the germ of it all lay there: had Luther in that moment done other, it had all been otherwise! The European World was asking him: Am I to sink ever lower into falsehood, stagnant putrescence, loathsome accursed death; or, with whatever paroxysm, 366to cast the falsehoods out of me, and be cured and live?—
Luther did not abandon us. His two-hour speech stood out for its respectful, wise, and honest tone; he was submissive to whatever could rightly demand submission, but not to more than that. He mentioned that his writings were partly his own and partly drawn from the Word of God. Regarding what was his own, human weakness played a role; unguarded anger, blindness, and many things he would be better off without. But regarding what was based on sound truth and the Word of God, he could not take it back. How could he? “Confute me,” he concluded, “with proof from Scripture or clear, logical arguments: I cannot recant any other way. For it is neither safe nor wise to act against my conscience. Here I stand; I cannot do otherwise: God help me!”—This is, as we say, the most significant moment in Modern History. English Puritanism, England and its Parliaments, the Americas, and the vast work of these two centuries; the French Revolution, Europe and its current developments: the seed of it all was sown there: had Luther acted differently in that moment, everything would have been different! The European World was asking him: Am I to sink ever deeper into falsehood, stagnant decay, and loathsome, cursed death; or, with whatever struggle, to cast out the falsehoods, be healed, and live?—
Great wars, contentions and disunion followed out of this Reformation; which last down to our day, and are yet far from ended. Great talk and crimination has been made about these. They are lamentable, undeniable; but after all what has Luther or his cause to do with them? It seems strange reasoning to charge the Reformation with all this. When Hercules turned the purifying river into King Augeas’s stables, I have no doubt the confusion that resulted was considerable all around: but I think it was not Hercules’s blame; it was some other’s blame! The Reformation might bring what results it liked when it came, but the Reformation simply could not help coming. To all Popes and Popes’ advocates, expostulating, lamenting and accusing, the answer of the world is: Once for all, your Popehood has become untrue. No matter how good it was, how good you say it is, we cannot believe it; the light of our whole mind, given us to walk-by from Heaven above, finds it henceforth a thing unbelievable. We will not believe it, we will not try to believe it,—we dare not! The thing is untrue; we were traitors against the Giver of all Truth, if we durst pretend to think it true. Away with it; let whatsoever likes come in the place of it: with it we can have no farther trade!—Luther and his Protestantism is not responsible for wars; the false Simulacra that forced him to protest, they are responsible. Luther did what every man that God has made has not only the right, but lies under the sacred duty, to do: answered a Falsehood when it questioned him, Dost thou believe me?—No!—At what cost soever, without counting of costs, this thing behoved to be done. Union, organisation spiritual and material, a far nobler than, any Popedom or Feudalism in their truest days, I never doubt, is coming for the world; sure to come. But on Fact alone, not on Semblance and Simulacrum, will it be able either to come, or to stand when come. With union grounded on falsehood, and ordering us to speak and act lies, we will not have anything to do. Peace? 367A brutal lethargy is peaceable, the noisome grave is peaceable. We hope for a living peace, not a dead one!
Great wars, conflicts, and division have followed from this Reformation; these issues persist even today and are far from over. There’s been a lot of talk and blame about them. They are unfortunate and undeniable; but what does Luther or his cause have to do with all this? It seems odd to hold the Reformation responsible for everything. When Hercules cleaned out King Augeas’s stables with a river, I’m sure the chaos that followed was significant: but that wasn’t Hercules’s fault; it was someone else's! The Reformation might bring any consequences it wants when it arrives, but it simply couldn’t be stopped from coming. To all the Popes and their supporters, lamenting and accusing, the response from the world is: Once and for all, your papacy has become untrue. No matter how good it was, or how good you claim it is, we can’t accept it; the clarity of our minds, given to us from Heaven above, now deems it unbelievable. We will not believe it, we will not even attempt to believe it—we dare not! The thing is untrue; we would be traitors to the Giver of all Truth if we even pretended to think it was true. Get rid of it; let whatever comes in its place come: we want nothing more to do with it! Luther and his Protestantism are not responsible for wars; the false images that forced him to protest are the ones to blame. Luther did what every person that God has made not only has the right but is under a sacred duty to do: he answered a Falsehood when it questioned him, “Do you believe me?”—“No!”—At whatever cost, without counting costs, this needed to be done. A union, both spiritual and material, far nobler than any Papacy or Feudalism in their finest days, is surely coming to the world. It will come based on Fact alone, not on Appearance or Falsehood, and it can only stand when it arrives if it is grounded on truth. With a union built on falsehood, ordering us to speak and act lies, we will have nothing to do with it. Peace? 367 A brutal lethargy is a form of peace, the stench of the grave is peaceful. We hope for a living peace, not a dead one!
And yet, in prizing justly the indispensable blessings of the New, let us not be unjust to the Old. The Old was true, if it no longer is. In Dante’s days it needed no sophistry, self-blinding, or other dishonesty, to get itself reckoned true. It was good then; nay there is in the soul of it a deathless good. The cry of ‘No Popery’ is foolish enough in these days. The speculation that Popery is on the increase, building new chapels and so forth, may pass for one of the idlest ever started. Very curious: to count-up a few Popish chapels, listen to a few Protestant logic-choppings,—to much dull-droning, drowsy inanity that still calls itself Protestant, and say: See, Protestantism is dead; Popeism is more alive than it, will be alive after it!—Drowsy inanities, not a few, that call themselves Protestant are dead; but Protestantism has not died yet, that I hear of! Protestantism, if we will look, has in these days produced its Goethe, its Napoleon; German Literature and the French Revolution; rather considerable signs of life! Nay, at bottom, what else is alive but Protestantism? The life of most else that one meets is a galvanic one merely,—not a pleasant, not a lasting sort of life!
And yet, while valuing the essential blessings of the New, let’s not ignore the Old. The Old was real, even if it isn’t anymore. Back in Dante’s time, it didn’t require any trickery, self-deception, or dishonesty to be recognized as true. It was good then; in fact, there’s an everlasting goodness at its core. The shout of ‘No Popery’ sounds pretty foolish these days. The idea that Popery is on the rise, building new chapels and so on, could be considered one of the silliest notions out there. It’s quite odd to tally up a few Catholic chapels, listen to some Protestant debates—filled with a lot of dull, tiresome nonsense that still calls itself Protestant—and conclude: Look, Protestantism is dead; Catholicism is more alive than it and will outlive it! There are indeed many dull ideas claiming to be Protestant that are dead; but Protestantism, as far as I know, isn’t dead yet! Protestantism has, in recent times, produced its own Goethe, its Napoleon; it has influenced German Literature and the French Revolution—pretty significant signs of life! In truth, what else is truly alive but Protestantism? The life of most other things we encounter is merely a mechanical one—not a pleasant or lasting kind of life!
Popery can build new chapels; welcome to do so, to all lengths. Popery cannot come back, any more than Paganism can,—which also still lingers in some countries. But, indeed, it is with these things, as with the ebbing of the sea: you look at the waves oscillating hither, thither on the beach; for minutes you cannot tell how it is going; look in half an hour where it is,—look in half a century where your Popehood is! Alas, would there were no greater danger to our Europe than the poor old Pope’s revival! Thor may as soon try to revive.—And withal this oscillation has a meaning. The poor old Popehood will not die away entirely, as Thor has done, for some time yet; nor ought it. We may say, the Old never dies till this happen, Till all the soul of good that was in it have got itself transfused into the practical New. While a good work remains capable of being done by the Romish form; 368or, what is inclusive of all, while a pious life remains capable of being led by it, just so long, if we consider, will this or the other human soul adopt it, go about as a living witness of it. So long it will obtrude itself on the eye of us who reject it, till we in our practice too have appropriated whatsoever of truth was in it. Then, but also not till then, it will have no charm more for any man. It lasts here for a purpose. Let it last as long as it can.—
Popery can build new chapels; feel free to do so as much as you want. Popery can’t return, just like Paganism can’t—though it still lingers in some places. But honestly, it’s like the ebb of the sea: you watch the waves moving back and forth on the shore; for minutes, you can’t tell what’s happening; look again in half an hour and see where it stands—check back in fifty years and see what’s become of your Papacy! Sadly, I wish there was no greater threat to Europe than the poor old Pope making a comeback! Thor might as well try to come back too. And this back-and-forth has a meaning. The poor old Papacy won’t completely fade away, like Thor has, for a while yet; nor should it. We can say that the Old never truly dies until this happens: until all the good that was in it has been transformed into something practical and new. As long as a good work can still be done through the Catholic Church, or more generally, as long as a pious life can still be led through it, just as long will some human soul embrace it and represent it as a living testimony. It will keep pushing itself into view for those of us who reject it until we too have taken in whatever truth was in it. Only then, and not before, will it lose its appeal for anyone. It’s here for a reason. Let it exist as long as it can.
Of Luther I will add now, in reference to all these wars and bloodshed, the noticeable fact that none of them began so long as he continued living. The controversy did not get to fighting so long as he was there. To me it is proof of his greatness in all senses, this fact. How seldom do we find a man that has stirred-up some vast commotion, who does not himself perish, swept-away in it! Such is the usual course of revolutionists. Luther continued, in a good degree, sovereign of this greatest revolution; all Protestants, of what rank or function soever, looking much to him for guidance: and he held it peaceable, continued firm at the centre of it. A man to do this must have a kingly faculty: he must have the gift to discern at all turns where the true heart of the matter lies, and to plant himself courageously on that, as a strong true man, that other true men may rally round him there. He will not continue leader of men otherwise. Luther’s clear deep force of judgment, his force of all sorts, of silence, of tolerance and moderation, among others, are very notable in these circumstances.
Of Luther, I want to point out that regarding all these wars and violence, it’s noteworthy that none of them started while he was still alive. The conflict didn’t escalate into fighting as long as he was around. To me, this is proof of his greatness in every sense. How often do we see someone who ignites such a huge upheaval without getting caught up in it themselves? That’s usually what happens to revolutionaries. Luther largely remained the guiding force in this major revolution; all Protestants, regardless of their status or role, looked to him for leadership, and he maintained peace, staying steady at the center of it. To achieve this, a person must possess a royal quality: they must have the ability to sense where the core issue lies and stand firmly on that ground, so that other like-minded individuals can gather around him. Otherwise, he won't remain a leader of men. Luther’s clear, deep judgment, along with his strengths in silence, tolerance, and moderation, among others, are very remarkable in this context.
Tolerance, I say; a very genuine kind of tolerance: he distinguishes what is essential, and what is not; the unessential may go very much as it will. A complaint comes to him that such and such a Reformed Preacher, ‘will not preach without a cassock.’ Well, answers Luther, what harm will a cassock do the man? ‘Let him have a cassock to preach in; let him have three cassocks if he find benefit in them!’ His conduct in the matter of Karlstadt’s wild image-breaking; of the Anabaptists; of the Peasants’ War, shows a noble strength, very different from spasmodic violence. With 369sure prompt insight he discriminates what is what: a strong just man, he speaks-forth what is the wise course, and all men follow him in that. Luther’s Written Works give similar testimony of him. The dialect of these speculations is now grown obsolete for us; but one still reads them with a singular attraction. And indeed the mere grammatical diction is still legible enough; Luther’s merit in literary history is of the greatest; his dialect became the language of all writing. They are not well written, these Four-and-twenty Quartos of his; written hastily, with quite other than literary objects. But in no Books have I found a more robust, genuine, I will say noble faculty of a man than in these. A rugged honesty, homeliness, simplicity; a rugged sterling sense and strength. He flashes-out illumination from him; his smiting idiomatic phrases seem to cleave into the very secret of the matter. Good humour too, nay tender affection, nobleness, and depth: this man could have been a Poet too! He had to work an Epic Poem, not write one. I call him a great Thinker; as indeed his greatness of heart already betokens that.
Tolerance, I’d say; a real kind of tolerance: he knows what’s important and what isn’t; the unimportant can go as it pleases. A complaint comes to him that a certain Reformed Preacher “won’t preach without a cassock.” Well, Luther answers, what’s the harm in a cassock? “Let him wear a cassock to preach in; let him have three cassocks if they’re helpful!” His actions regarding Karlstadt’s extreme iconoclasm, the Anabaptists, and the Peasants’ War show a strength that’s noble and far from just being reactive. With sure and prompt insight, he distinguishes what matters: a strong and just man, he articulates what the wise path is, and everyone follows him. Luther’s Written Works reflect this as well. The language of these ideas may feel outdated to us now, but they still have a unique appeal. While the grammar is still clear enough, Luther’s impact on literary history is immense; his style became the standard for writing. These Four-and-twenty Quartos of his aren’t well written; they were produced quickly, with purposes other than literary achievement. Yet in no books have I found a more robust, authentic, I would say noble, expression of a man than in these. There’s a rugged honesty, simplicity, and straightforward strength. He radiates insight; his impactful phrases seem to get to the very heart of things. There’s good humor too, along with a gentle affection, nobility, and depth: this man could have been a Poet as well! He needed to work an Epic Poem, not just write one. I regard him as a great Thinker; indeed, his greatness of heart makes that clear.
Richter says of Luther’s words, ‘his words are half-battles.’ They may be called so. The essential quality of him was, that he could fight and conquer; that he was a right piece of human Valour. No more valiant man, no mortal heart to be called braver, that one has record of, ever lived in that Teutonic Kindred, whose character is valour. His defiance of the ‘Devils’ in Worms was not a mere boast, as the like might be if now spoken. It was a faith of Luther’s that there were Devils, spiritual denizens of the Pit, continually besetting men. Many times, in his writings, this turns-up; and a most small sneer has been grounded on it by some. In the room of the Wartburg where he sat translating the Bible, they still show you a black spot on the wall; the strange memorial of one of these conflicts. Luther sat translating one of the Psalms; he was worn-down with long labour, with sickness, abstinence from food: there rose before him some hideous indefinable Image, which he took for the Evil One, to forbid his work: Luther started-up, with fiend-defiance; 370flung his inkstand at the spectre, and it disappeared! The spot still remains there; a curious monument of several things. Any apothecary’s apprentice can now tell us what we are to think of this apparition, in a scientific sense: but the man’s heart that dare rise defiant, face to face, against Hell itself, can give no higher proof of fearlessness. The thing he will quail before exists not on this Earth or under it.—Fearless enough! ‘The Devil is aware,’ writes he on one occasion, ‘that this does not proceed out of fear in me. I have seen and defied innumerable Devils. Duke George,’ of Leipzig, a great enemy of his, ‘Duke George is not equal to one Devil,’—far short of a Devil! ‘If I had business at Leipzig, I would ride into Leipzig, though it rained Duke-Georges for nine days running.’ What a reservoir of Dukes to ride into!—
Richter comments on Luther’s words, saying, “his words are half-battles.” They could definitely be called that. What defined him was his ability to fight and win; he embodied true human courage. No man braver, no heart more valiant, has ever been recorded in that Teutonic lineage known for its bravery. His defiance of the ‘Devils’ in Worms wasn’t just a boast, unlike how it might sound today. Luther firmly believed in the existence of Devils, spiritual beings from the Pit that constantly plagued humanity. This belief appears frequently in his writings, and some have sneered at it. In the Wartburg room where he translated the Bible, there’s still a black mark on the wall, a strange reminder of one of these confrontations. Luther was translating one of the Psalms, exhausted from long labor, illness, and lack of food, when a terrifying, indescribable image appeared before him, which he believed to be the Evil One, trying to stop his work. Luther jumped up, defiantly faced it, and threw his inkstand at the specter, causing it to vanish! The mark remains, an intriguing monument to several things. Any apothecary’s apprentice could now explain what this apparition was in scientific terms, but a man’s heart that dares to stand defiantly against Hell itself offers no greater proof of fearlessness. The only thing he would fear does not exist on this Earth or beneath it.—Fearless enough! “The Devil knows,” he writes once, “that this comes not from fear in me. I have seen and defied countless Devils. Duke George,” from Leipzig, a major adversary of his, “Duke George is nothing compared to one Devil”—far less than a Devil! “If I had business in Leipzig, I’d ride right in, even if it rained Duke Georges for nine days straight.” What a lot of Dukes to ride through!—
At the same time, they err greatly who imagine that this man’s courage was ferocity, mere coarse disobedient obstinacy and savagery, as many do. Far from that. There may be an absence of fear which arises from the absence of thought or affection, from the presence of hatred and stupid fury. We do not value the courage of the tiger highly! With Luther it was far otherwise; no accusation could be more unjust than this of mere ferocious violence brought against him. A most gentle heart withal, full of pity and love, as indeed the truly valiant heart ever is. The tiger before a stronger foe—flies: the tiger is not what we call valiant, only fierce and cruel. I know few things more touching than those soft breathings of affection, soft as a child’s or a mother’s, in this great wild heart of Luther. So honest, unadulterated with any cant; homely, rude in their utterance; pure as water welling from the rock. What, in fact, was all that downpressed mood of despair and reprobation, which we saw in his youth, but the outcome of pre-eminent thoughtful gentleness, affections too keen and fine? It is the course such men as the poor Poet Cowper fall into. Luther to a slight observer might have seemed a timid, weak man; modesty, affectionate shrinking tenderness the chief distinction of him. It is a noble valour which is 371roused in a heart like this, once stirred-up into defiance, all kindled into a heavenly blaze.
At the same time, those who think that this man’s courage was just aggression, stubbornness, or savagery are greatly mistaken, as many believe. It's quite the opposite. Fearlessness can sometimes come from a lack of thought or caring, fueled by hatred and mindless rage. We don’t think highly of a tiger’s courage! With Luther, it was very different; nothing could be more unfair than accusing him of mere violent ferocity. He had a gentle heart, filled with compassion and love, as truly brave hearts often do. The tiger flees before a stronger enemy—it's fierce and cruel, but not what we consider brave. I can’t think of many things more moving than the tender expressions of affection in Luther's great wild heart, soft as a child’s or a mother’s. They are so honest, free from pretense; simple and rough in their expression, pure like water from a rock. What was that oppressive mood of despair and rejection we saw in his youth but a result of profound thoughtfulness and delicate feelings? It’s a path that those like the unfortunate Poet Cowper often find themselves on. To a casual observer, Luther might have appeared shy and weak, with modesty and tender affection being his main traits. It’s a noble bravery that rises in a heart like his, ignited into a heavenly blaze once challenged.
In Luther’s Table-Talk, a posthumous Book of anecdotes and sayings collected by his friends, the most interesting now of all the Books proceeding from him, we have many beautiful unconscious displays of the man, and what sort of nature he had. His behaviour at the deathbed of his little Daughter, so still, so great and loving, is among the most affecting things. He is resigned that his little Magdalene should die, yet longs inexpressibly that she might live;—follows, in awe-struck thought, the flight of her little soul through those unknown realms. Awe-struck; most heartfelt, we can see; and sincere,—for after all dogmatic creeds and articles, he feels what nothing it is that we know, or can know: His little Magdalene shall be with God, as God wills; for Luther too that is all; Islam is all.
In Luther’s Table-Talk, a posthumous collection of anecdotes and sayings gathered by his friends, there are many beautiful, unguarded glimpses of the man and his character. His behavior at the deathbed of his little daughter is incredibly moving—so calm, so profound, and loving. He accepts that his little Magdalene should die, yet he longs indescribably for her to live; he watches in awe as her little soul journeys into the unknown. It's heartfelt, sincere, and deeply affecting—because despite all dogmatic beliefs and doctrines, he recognizes how little we truly know. His little Magdalene will be with God, as God wishes; for Luther, that is everything; Islam is everything.
Once, he looks-out from his solitary Patmos, the Castle of Coburg, in the middle of the night: The great vault of Immensity, long flights of clouds sailing through it,—dumb, gaunt, huge:—who supports all that? “None ever saw the pillars of it; yet it is supported.” God supports it. We must know that God is great, that God is good; and trust, where we cannot see.—Returning home from Leipzig once, he is struck by the beauty of the harvest-fields: How it stands, that golden yellow corn, on its fair taper stem, its golden head bent, all rich and waving there,—the meek Earth, at God’s kind bidding, has produced it once again; the bread of man!—In the garden at Wittenburg one evening at sunset, a little bird was perched for the night: That little bird, says Luther, above it are the stars and deep Heaven of worlds; yet it has folded its little wings; gone trustfully to rest there as in its home: the Maker of it has given it too a home!—Neither are mirthful turns wanting: there is a great free human heart in this man. The common speech of him has a rugged nobleness, idiomatic, expressive, genuine; gleams here and there with beautiful poetic tints. One feels him to be a great brother man. His love of Music, indeed, is not this, as it were, the summary of all these affections in him? Many a wild unutterability he spoke-forth 372from him in the tones of his flute. The Devils fled from his flute, he says. Death-defiance on the one hand, and such love of music on the other; I could call these the two opposite poles of a great soul; between these two all great things had room.
Once, he looked out from his solitary Patmos, the Castle of Coburg, in the middle of the night: The vast sky of immensity, long streaks of clouds floating through it—silent, gaunt, immense—who supports all that? “No one has ever seen the pillars of it; yet it is supported.” God supports it. We must acknowledge that God is great, that God is good; and trust where we cannot see. Returning home from Leipzig one time, he is struck by the beauty of the harvest fields: How the golden yellow corn stands tall on its fair, slender stem, its golden head bent, rich and waving there—the humble Earth, at God’s kind command, has produced it once again; the bread of man! In the garden at Wittenburg one evening at sunset, a little bird was perched for the night: That little bird, says Luther, above it are the stars and the vast Heaven of worlds; yet it has folded its tiny wings; it has gone trustfully to rest there as if it were at home: the Maker of it has provided it a home! Neither are there any lack of joyful moments: there is a great free human heart in this man. His common speech has a rugged nobility, idiomatic, expressive, genuine; it glimmers here and there with beautiful poetic shades. You feel he is a great brother to man. His love of music, indeed, isn’t this the essence of all these affections in him? Many a wild unutterable feeling he expressed through the tones of his flute. The devils fled from his flute, he says. A defiance of death on one hand, and such a love of music on the other; I could call these the two opposite poles of a great soul; between these two, all great things found a place.
Luther’s face is to me expressive of him; in Kranach’s best portraits I find the true Luther. A rude plebeian face; with its huge crag-like brows and bones, the emblem of rugged energy; at first, almost a repulsive face. Yet in the eyes especially there is a wild silent sorrow; an unnamable melancholy, the element of all gentle and fine affections; giving to the rest the true stamp of nobleness. Laughter was in this Luther, as we said; but tears also were there. Tears also were appointed him; tears and hard toil. The basis of his life was Sadness, Earnestness. In his latter days, after all triumphs and victories, he expresses himself heartily weary of living; he considers that God alone can and will regulate the course things are taking, and that perhaps the Day of Judgment is not far. As for him, he longs for one thing: that God would release him from his labour, and let him depart and be at rest. They understand little of the man who cite this in discredit of him!—I will call this Luther a true Great Man; great in intellect, in courage, affection and integrity; one of our most lovable and precious men. Great, not as a hewn obelisk; but as an Alpine mountain,—so simple, honest, spontaneous, not setting-up to be great at all; there for quite another purpose than being great! Ah yes, unsubduable granite, piercing far and wide into the Heavens; yet in the clefts of it fountains, green beautiful valleys with flowers! A right Spiritual Hero and Prophet; once more, a true Son of Nature and Fact, for whom these centuries, and many that are to come yet, will be thankful to Heaven.
Luther’s face is very expressive of who he is; in Kranach’s best portraits, I see the real Luther. He has a rough, common man’s face, with his large, craggy brows and bones, symbolizing raw energy; at first glance, it’s almost a repulsive face. Yet especially in his eyes, there’s a wild, silent sorrow; an indescribable melancholy, the essence of all gentle and fine feelings; this gives the rest of his features a true mark of nobility. Laughter was part of this Luther, as we said; but tears were there too. Tears were part of his life; tears and hard work. The foundation of his life was Sadness and Seriousness. In his later years, after all his triumphs and victories, he openly expresses his deep weariness of life; he believes that only God can and will direct the course of things, and that perhaps the Day of Judgment isn’t too far off. As for him, he longs for one thing: for God to free him from his labor and let him go and find peace. Those who cite this to discredit him understand little of the man! I will call this Luther a true Great Man; great in intellect, courage, love, and integrity; one of our most lovable and precious figures. Great, not like a carved obelisk, but like an Alpine mountain—so simple, honest, and spontaneous, not trying to be great at all; here for quite another purpose than to be great! Ah yes, unyielding granite, stretching far and wide into the heavens; yet in its crevices lay fountains and beautiful green valleys with flowers! A true Spiritual Hero and Prophet; once more, a genuine Son of Nature and Reality, for whom these centuries, and many yet to come, will be grateful to Heaven.
The most interesting phasis which the Reformation anywhere assumes, especially for us English, is that of Puritanism. In Luther’s own country Protestantism soon dwindled into a rather barren affair: not a religion or faith, but rather now a theological jangling of argument, the proper seat of it not the heart; the essence of it sceptical contention: which indeed has jangled 373more and more, down to Voltaireism itself,—through Gustavus-Adolphus contentions onward to French-Revolution ones! But in our Island there arose a Puritanism, which even got itself established as a Presbyterianism and National Church among the Scotch; which came forth as a real business of the heart; and has produced in the world very notable fruit. In some senses, one may say it is the only phasis of Protestantism that ever got to the rank of being a Faith, a true heart-communication with Heaven, and of exhibiting itself in History as such. We must spare a few words for Knox; himself a brave and remarkable man; but still more important as Chief Priest and Founder, which one may consider him to be, of the Faith that became Scotland’s, New England’s, Oliver Cromwell’s. History will have something to say about this, for some time to come!
The most interesting phase of the Reformation, especially for us English, is Puritanism. In Luther’s homeland, Protestantism quickly turned into a rather empty practice: not a religion or faith, but more like a theological clash of arguments, where the heart was not the focus; its essence became skeptical debate, which has only intensified, leading to Voltaire and beyond—through the disputes of Gustavus Adolphus to the ones of the French Revolution! However, in our country, Puritanism emerged and even established itself as Presbyterianism and a National Church in Scotland; it arose as a genuine matter of the heart and has produced notably significant results in the world. In some ways, one could argue that it’s the only phase of Protestantism that truly became a Faith, a real heart-to-heart connection with Heaven, and has shown itself in History as such. We should take a moment to mention Knox; a brave and remarkable man, but even more important as the Chief Priest and Founder of the Faith that became Scotland's, New England's, and Oliver Cromwell's. History will have more to say about this for a long time to come!
We may censure Puritanism as we please; and no one of us, I suppose, but would find it a very rough defective thing. But we, and all men, may understand that it was a genuine thing; for Nature has adopted it, and it has grown, and grows. I say sometimes, that all goes by wager-of-battle in this world; that strength, well understood, is the measure of all worth. Give a thing time; if it can succeed, it is a right thing. Look now at American Saxondom; and at that little Fact of the sailing of the Mayflower, two hundred years ago, from Delft Haven in Holland! Were we of open sense as the Greeks were, we had found a Poem here; one of Nature’s own Poems; such as she writes in broad facts over great continents. For it was properly the beginning of America: there were straggling settlers in America before, some material as of a body was there; but the soul of it was first this. These poor men, driven-out of their country, not able well to live in Holland, determine on settling in the New World. Black untamed forests are there, and wild savage creatures; but not so cruel as Starchamber hangmen. They thought the Earth would yield them food, if they tilled honestly; the everlasting heaven would stretch there too, overhead; they should be left in peace, to prepare for Eternity by living well in this world of Time; worshipping in what they thought the true, not 374the idolatrous way. They clubbed their small means together; hired a ship, the little ship Mayflower, and made ready to set sail.
We can criticize Puritanism all we want, and I think we’d all agree it has its flaws. But we, like everyone else, can recognize that it was something real; Nature embraced it, and it has evolved and continues to evolve. Sometimes I say that everything in this world is determined by a sort of battle; that strength, when truly understood, is what defines all value. Give something time; if it manages to succeed, then it’s a valid thing. Just look at American Saxondom and that little fact of the Mayflower setting sail two hundred years ago from Delft Haven in Holland! If we were as open-minded as the Greeks, we would see a Poem here; one of Nature’s own Poems, written in broad strokes across vast continents. This marked the true beginning of America: there were a few settlers here before, some foundational elements existed; but the soul of it started with this. These unfortunate men, driven out of their homeland and unable to thrive in Holland, decided to settle in the New World. There were dark, untamed forests, filled with wild creatures; but they were not as cruel as the hangmen of the Star Chamber. They believed the land would provide for them if they worked honestly; and the endless sky would stretch above them; they hoped to be left in peace, preparing for Eternity by living rightly in this world of Time; worshipping in what they regarded as the true manner, not in an idolatrous way. They pooled their limited resources, chartered a ship, the little Mayflower, and prepared to set sail.
In Neal’s History of the Puritans** Neal (London, 1755), i. 490. is an account of the ceremony of their departure: solemnity, we might call it rather, for it was a real act of worship. Their minister went down with them to the beach, and their brethren whom they were to leave behind; all joined in solemn prayer, That God would have pity on His poor children, and go with them into that waste wilderness, for He also had made that, He was there also as well as here.—Hah! These men, I think, had a work! The weak thing, weaker than a child, becomes strong one day, if it be a true thing. Puritanism was only despicable, laughable then; but nobody can manage to laugh at it now. Puritanism has got weapons and sinews; it has fire-arms, war-navies; it has cunning in its ten fingers, strength in its right arm; it can steer ships, fell forests, remove mountains;—it is one of the strongest things under the sun at present!
In Neal’s History of the PuritansUnderstood. Please provide the text you'd like modernized.* Neal (London, 1755), p. 490. there's a description of the ceremony for their departure: we might call it solemnity, since it was a genuine act of worship. Their minister accompanied them to the beach, and their fellow believers, whom they were leaving behind, all took part in a solemn prayer, asking God to have mercy on His struggling children and to go with them into that desolate wilderness, for He had created it and was present there just as He was here. —Hah! These men, I believe, had a mission! Something fragile, weaker than a child, can become strong one day if it’s genuine. Puritanism was seen as pathetic and laughable back then; but no one can mock it now. Puritanism has gained weapons and power; it has firearms and naval forces; it exhibits skill in its ten fingers and strength in its right arm; it can navigate ships, fell forests, and move mountains;—it is one of the strongest forces on earth today!
In the history of Scotland, too, I can find properly but one epoch: we may say it contains nothing of world-interest at all but this Reformation by Knox. A poor barren country, full of continual broils, dissensions, massacrings; a people in the last state of rudeness and destitution, little better perhaps than Ireland at this day. Hungry fierce barons, not so much as able to form any arrangement with each other how to divide what they fleeced from these poor drudges; but obliged, as the Columbian Republics are at this day, to make of every alteration a revolution; no way of changing a ministry but by hanging the old ministers on gibbets: this is a historical spectacle of no very singular significance! ‘Bravery’ enough, I doubt not; fierce fighting in abundance: but not braver or fiercer than that of their old Scandinavian Sea-king ancestors; whose exploits we have not found worth dwelling on! It is a country as yet without a soul: nothing developed in it but what is rude, external, semi-animal. And now at the Reformation, the internal life is kindled, as it were, under the ribs of this outward material death. A 375cause, the noblest of causes kindles itself, like a beacon set on high; high as Heaven, yet attainable from Earth;—whereby the meanest man becomes not a Citizen only, but a Member of Christ’s visible Church; a veritable Hero, if he prove a true man!
In Scotland's history, I can really only identify one significant period: we might say it holds nothing of global interest except for the Reformation led by Knox. It's a largely desolate country, plagued by constant conflicts, disagreements, and massacres; a people existing in a state of rawness and poverty, perhaps not much better off than Ireland today. Greedy, fierce barons, unable to even agree on how to share what they took from these poor laborers; forced, much like the Republics of Colombia are today, to view every change as a revolution; no way to change a government except by hanging the old ministers on gallows: this is a historical scene of no particular importance! There’s certainly bravery; fierce fighting in abundance: but not braver or fiercer than that of their old Scandinavian Sea-king ancestors; whose exploits we have not found worth focusing on! It's a country still lacking a soul: nothing has developed in it but what is crude, superficial, and somewhat animalistic. And now, with the Reformation, internal life begins to spark, as if beneath the surface of this external material decay. A cause, the noblest of causes, lights up like a beacon set high; high as Heaven, yet reachable from Earth;—through which the humblest person becomes not just a Citizen, but a Member of Christ’s visible Church; a true Hero, if he proves to be a genuine person!
Well; this is what I mean by a whole ‘nation of heroes;’ a believing nation. There needs not a great soul to make a hero; there needs a god-created soul which will be true to its origin; that will be a great soul! The like has been seen, we find. The like will be again seen, under wider forms than the Presbyterian: there can be no lasting good done till then.—Impossible! say some. Possible? Has it not been, in this world, as a practised fact? Did Hero-worship fail in Knox’s case? Or are we made of other clay now? Did the Westminster Confession of Faith add some new property to the soul of man? God made the soul of man. He did not doom any soul of man to live as a Hypothesis and Hearsay, in a world filled with such, and with the fatal work and fruit of such!——
Well, this is what I mean by a whole ‘nation of heroes;’ a believing nation. You don't need a great soul to be a hero; you need a god-created soul that stays true to its origin; that will be a great soul! We've seen this before, and we'll see it again, in broader forms than just the Presbyterian: no lasting good can be achieved until then.—“Impossible!” some might say. But is it possible? Has it not been, in this world, as a proven fact? Did hero-worship fail with Knox? Are we made of different stuff now? Did the Westminster Confession of Faith give man's soul any new attributes? God created the soul of man. He didn’t condemn any soul of man to exist as a Hypothesis and Hearsay, in a world filled with such things, and with the destructive work and consequences of such!——
But to return: This that Knox did for his Nation, I say, we may really call a resurrection as from death. It was not a smooth business; but it was welcome surely, and cheap at that price, had it been far rougher. On the whole, cheap at any price;—as life is. The people began to live: they needed first of all to do that, at what cost and costs soever. Scotch Literature and Thought, Scotch Industry; James Watt, David Hume, Walter Scott, Robert Burns: I find Knox and the Reformation acting in the heart’s core of every one of these persons and phenomena; I find that without the Reformation they would not have been. Or what of Scotland? The Puritanism of Scotland became that of England, of New England. A tumult in the High Church of Edinburgh spread into a universal battle and struggle over all these realms;—there came out, after fifty years’ struggling, what we call the ‘Glorious Revolution,’ a Habeas-Corpus Act, Free Parliaments, and much else!—Alas, is it not too true what we said, That many men in the van do always, like Russian soldiers, march into the ditch of Schweidnitz, and fill it up with their dead bodies, that the rear may pass over them dry-shod 376and gain the honour? How many earnest rugged Cromwells, Knoxes, poor Peasant Covenants, wrestling, battling for very life, in rough miry places, have to struggle, and suffer, and fall, greatly censured, bemired,—before a beautiful Revolution of Eighty-eight can step-over them in official pumps and silk-stockings, with universal three-times-three!
But to get back to the point: What Knox did for his nation, I say, we can truly call a resurrection from the dead. It wasn’t an easy process, but it was definitely welcomed, and worth it even if it had been much harsher. Overall, it was worth any price—just like life is. The people began to live: that was their priority, no matter the cost. Scottish literature and thought, Scottish industry; James Watt, David Hume, Walter Scott, Robert Burns: I see Knox and the Reformation at the very core of each of these people and ideas; without the Reformation, they wouldn’t have existed. And what about Scotland? The Puritanism of Scotland became that of England and New England. A disturbance in the High Church of Edinburgh turned into a widespread conflict throughout all these regions; what emerged, after fifty years of struggle, is what we now call the ‘Glorious Revolution,’ a Habeas-Corpus Act, free parliaments, and much more!—Alas, is it not painfully true what we said, that many men at the front always, like Russian soldiers, march into the ditch of Schweidnitz, and fill it with their dead bodies, so that those behind them can pass over dry-shod and gain the glory? How many earnest, rugged Cromwells, Knoxes, and poor Peasant Covenanters, fighting for their very lives in rough, muddy places, have to struggle, suffer, and fall, often harshly criticized, bemired,—before a beautiful Revolution of ’88 can step over them in official pumps and silk stockings, receiving universal three-times-three!
It seems to me hard measure that this Scottish man, now after three-hundred years, should have to plead like a culprit before the world; intrinsically for having been, in such way as it was then possible to be, the bravest of all Scotchmen! Had he been a poor Half-and-half, he could have crouched into the corner, like so many others; Scotland had not been delivered; and Knox had been without blame. He is the one Scotchman to whom, of all others, his country and the world owe a debt. He has to plead that Scotland would forgive him for having been worth to it any million ‘unblamable’ Scotchmen that need no forgiveness! He bared his breast to the battle; had to row in French galleys, wander forlorn in exile, in clouds and storms; was censured, shot-at through his windows; had a right sore fighting life: if this world were his place of recompense, he had made but a bad venture of it. I cannot apologise for Knox. To him it is very indifferent, these two-hundred-and-fifty years or more, what men say of him. But we, having got above all those details of his battle, and living now in clearness on the fruits of his victory, we, for our own sake, ought to look through the rumours and controversies enveloping the man, into the man himself.
It seems really unfair that this Scottish man, now after three hundred years, should have to plead like a criminal before the world; basically for having been, in the way it was possible back then, the bravest of all Scots! If he had been just an average person, he could have hidden in a corner like so many others; Scotland wouldn’t have been freed, and Knox wouldn’t have been blamed. He is the one Scot to whom, more than anyone else, his country and the world owe a debt. He has to ask Scotland to forgive him for being worth more to it than any million 'blameless' Scots who need no forgiveness! He stood up to battle; had to row in French galleys, wander alone in exile through storms; he was attacked and shot at through his windows; he had a tough, fighting life: if this world were his place of reward, he didn’t get much out of it. I can’t defend Knox. To him, it doesn’t really matter, after all these two hundred and fifty years or more, what people say about him. But we, having moved beyond all those details of his struggle, and living now clearly on the benefits of his victory, should for our own sake look beyond the gossip and controversies surrounding the man, and see the man himself.
For one thing, I will remark that this post of Prophet to his Nation was not of his seeking; Knox had lived forty years quietly obscure, before he became conspicuous. He was the son of poor parents; had got a college education; become a Priest; adopted the Reformation, and seemed well content to guide his own steps by the light of it, nowise unduly intruding it on others. He had lived as Tutor in gentlemen’s families; preaching when any body of persons wished to hear his doctrine: resolute he to walk by the truth, and speak the truth when called to do it; not ambitious of more; 377not fancying himself capable of more. In this entirely obscure way he had reached the age of forty; was with the small body of Reformers who were standing siege in St Andrew’s Castle,—when one day in their chapel, the Preacher after finishing his exhortation to these fighters in the forlorn hope, said suddenly, That there ought to be other speakers, that all men who had a priest’s heart and gift in them ought now to speak;—which gifts and heart one of their own number, John Knox the name of him, had: Had he not? said the Preacher, appealing to all the audience: what then is his duty? The people answered affirmatively; it was a criminal forsaking of his post, if such a man held the word that was in him silent. Poor Knox was obliged to stand-up; he attempted to reply; he could say no word;—burst into a flood of tears, and ran out. It is worth remembering, that scene. He was in grievous trouble for some days. He felt what a small faculty was his for this great work. He felt what a baptism he was called to be baptised withal. He ‘burst into tears.’
For one thing, I want to point out that this role of Prophet to his Nation wasn't something he sought out; Knox had lived a quiet, unnoticed life for forty years before he became prominent. He was the son of poor parents, received a college education, became a Priest, embraced the Reformation, and seemed satisfied to follow it for himself without imposing it on others. He had worked as a Tutor in wealthy families, preaching whenever a group wanted to hear his views: determined to live by the truth and speak it when needed, not wanting anything more, not thinking he was capable of more. In this completely unnoticed way, he reached the age of forty and was with the small group of Reformers besieged in St Andrew's Castle—when one day in their chapel, the Preacher, after finishing his message to these fighters in a desperate situation, suddenly said that there should be other speakers, that all men with a priest's heart and talent should now speak; which gifts and heart one of their own, John Knox, had: Didn't he? asked the Preacher, addressing the audience: what is his duty then? The people agreed; it would be a serious dereliction of duty if such a man kept the words he had inside silent. Poor Knox was compelled to stand up; he tried to respond; he couldn't say a word—he burst into tears and ran out. It's worth remembering that scene. He was in deep distress for several days. He realized how limited his ability was for this significant task. He understood the heavy burden he was called to bear. He 'burst into tears.'
Our primary characteristic of a Hero, that he is sincere, applies emphatically to Knox. It is not denied anywhere that this, whatever might be his other qualities or faults, is among the truest of men. With a singular instinct he holds to the truth and fact; the truth alone is there for him, the rest a mere shadow and deceptive nonentity. However feeble, forlorn the reality may seem, on that and that only can he take his stand. In the Galleys of the River Loire, whither Knox and the others, after their Castle of St Andrew’s was taken, had been sent as Galley-slaves,—some officer or priest, one day, presented them an Image of the Virgin Mother, requiring that they, the blasphemous heretics, should do it reverence. Mother? Mother of God? said Knox, when the turn came to him: This is no Mother of God: this is ‘a pented bredd,’—a piece of wood, I tell you, with paint on it! She is fitter for swimming, I think, than for being worshipped, added Knox, and flung the thing into the river. It was not very cheap jesting there: but come of it what might, this thing to Knox was and must continue nothing other than the real truth; it was a pented bredd; worship it he would not.
Our main trait of a Hero, which is his sincerity, definitely applies to Knox. No one can deny that, regardless of his other qualities or flaws, he is one of the truest men. He has a unique instinct for holding onto truth and facts; for him, only the truth exists, while everything else is just a shadow and a deceptive nothing. No matter how weak or hopeless the reality may seem, it's the only thing he can stand on. When Knox and the others were sent as galley slaves to the Galleys of the River Loire after their Castle of St Andrew’s was captured, one day an officer or priest presented them with an image of the Virgin Mother, demanding that they—the blasphemous heretics—show it respect. "Mother? Mother of God?" Knox said when it was his turn. "This is no Mother of God: this is ‘a pented bredd,’—a piece of wood, I tell you, with paint on it! I think it’s better for swimming than for being worshipped," Knox added, and he tossed the thing into the river. It wasn't exactly cheap humor there, but no matter what came of it, for Knox, this was and would always be nothing other than the real truth; it was a pented bredd; he would not worship it.
378He told his fellow-prisoners, in this darkest time, to be of courage; the Cause they had was the true one, and must and would prosper; the whole world could not put it down. Reality is of God’s making; it is alone strong. How many pented bredds, pretending to be real, are fitter to swim than to be worshipped!—This Knox cannot live but by fact: he clings to reality as the shipwrecked sailor to the cliff. He is an instance to us how a man, by sincerity itself, becomes heroic: it is the grand gift he has. We find in Knox a good honest intellectual talent, no transcendent one;—a narrow, inconsiderable man, as compared with Luther: but in heartfelt instinctive adherence to truth, in sincerity, as we say, he has no superior; nay, one might ask, What equal he has? The heart of him is of the true Prophet cast. “He lies there,” said the Earl of Morton at his grave, “who never feared the face of man.” He resembles, more than any of the moderns, an Old-Hebrew Prophet. The same inflexibility, intolerance, rigid narrow-looking adherence to God’s truth, stern rebuke in the name of God to all that forsake truth: an Old-Hebrew Prophet in the guise of an Edinburgh Minister of the Sixteenth Century. We are to take him for that; not require him to be other.
378He encouraged his fellow prisoners, in this darkest time, to be brave; the cause they supported was the right one and would succeed; nothing in the world could stop it. Reality is created by God; it is the only thing that is truly strong. How many fake beliefs, pretending to be real, are better suited to swim than to be worshipped!—This Knox can only survive by sticking to the facts: he holds onto reality like a shipwrecked sailor clings to a cliff. He shows us how a person can become heroic through sincerity alone: that is his great gift. Knox has a solid, honest intellectual ability, nothing extraordinary; he is a narrow, limited man compared to Luther; but in his heartfelt, instinctive loyalty to the truth, in sincerity, as we say, he stands unmatched; in fact, one might ask who is equal to him? His heart is made of true prophetic material. “He lies there,” said the Earl of Morton at his grave, “who never feared the face of man.” He resembles an Old Hebrew Prophet more than any of today's figures. He exhibits the same inflexibility, intolerance, and rigid commitment to God’s truth, sternly admonishing all who abandon it: an Old Hebrew Prophet in the form of a Sixteenth Century Edinburgh Minister. We should accept him as that; we should not expect him to be anything else.
Knox’s conduct to Queen Mary, the harsh visits he used to make in her own palace, to reprove her there, have been much commented upon. Such cruelty, such coarseness fills us with indignation. On reading the actual narrative of the business, what Knox said, and what Knox meant, I must say one’s tragic feeling is rather disappointed. They are not so coarse, these speeches; they seem to me about as fine as the circumstances would permit! Knox was not there to do the courtier; he came on another errand. Whoever, reading these colloquies of his with the Queen, thinks they are vulgar insolences of a plebeian priest to a delicate high lady, mistakes the purport and essence of them altogether. It was unfortunately not possible to be polite with the Queen of Scotland, unless one proved untrue to the Nation and Cause of Scotland. A man who did not wish to see the land of his birth made a hunting-field for intriguing ambitious Guises, and the Cause of 379God trampled underfoot of Falsehoods, Formulas and the Devil’s Cause, had no method of making himself agreeable! “Better that women weep,” said Morton, “than that bearded men be forced to weep.” Knox was the constitutional opposition-party in Scotland: the Nobles of the country, called by their station to take that post, were not found in it; Knox had to go or no one. The hapless Queen;—but the still more hapless Country, if she were made happy! Mary herself was not without sharpness enough, among her other qualities: “Who are you,” said she once, “that presume to school the nobles and sovereign of this realm?”—“Madam, a subject born within the same,” answered he. Reasonably answered! If the ‘subject’ have truth to speak, it is not the ‘subject’s’ footing that will fail him here.—
Knox’s behavior towards Queen Mary, especially the harsh visits he made to her palace to reprimand her, has drawn a lot of criticism. Such cruelty and rudeness evoke our indignation. However, after reading the actual accounts of what Knox said and meant, one’s tragic feelings are somewhat disappointed. His speeches aren’t as crude as they might seem; they strike me as about as respectful as the situation would allow! Knox wasn’t there to play the courtier; he had a different mission. Anyone who reads his dialogues with the Queen and thinks they are the vulgar insolence of a common priest speaking to a refined lady completely misses their meaning and purpose. Unfortunately, it was impossible to be polite with the Queen of Scotland unless one was willing to betray the nation and the cause of Scotland. A man who wanted to prevent his homeland from being turned into a battleground for ambitious Guises and have the cause of God trampled by falsehoods and the devil's work had no way to make himself agreeable! “Better that women weep,” said Morton, “than that bearded men be forced to weep.” Knox represented the constitutional opposition in Scotland: the nobles who should have taken that role were absent, so Knox had to step in where no one else would. The unfortunate Queen;—but the even more unfortunate country if she were made happy! Mary herself had enough sharpness among her other traits: “Who are you,” she once asked, “to admonish the nobles and sovereign of this realm?”—“Madam, a subject born within the same,” he replied. A reasonable answer! If a ‘subject’ has truth to share, it doesn't matter what their status is in that moment.
We blame Knox for his intolerance. Well, surely it is good that each of us be as tolerant as possible. Yet, at bottom, after all the talk there is and has been about it, what is tolerance? Tolerance has to tolerate the unessential; and to see well what that is. Tolerance has to be noble, measured, just in its very wrath, when it can tolerate no longer. But, on the whole, we are not altogether here to tolerate! We are here to resist, to control and vanquish withal. We do not ‘tolerate’ Falsehoods, Thieveries, Iniquities, when they fasten on us; we say to them, Thou art false, thou art not tolerable! We are here to extinguish Falsehoods, and put an end to them, in some wise way! I will not quarrel so much with the way; the doing of the thing is our great concern. In this sense Knox was, full surely, intolerant.
We blame Knox for his intolerance. Well, it’s certainly good for each of us to be as tolerant as possible. Yet, in the end, after all the discussions about it, what is tolerance? Tolerance must accept the unessential and recognize what that really is. Tolerance should be noble, measured, and just in its anger when it can’t tolerate anymore. But, overall, we’re not really here just to tolerate! We’re here to resist, to control, and to overcome. We do not ‘tolerate’ falsehoods, thefts, or injustices when they strike us; we tell them, You are false, you are not acceptable! We’re here to eliminate falsehoods and end them in some way! I won’t argue too much about the method; what matters most is getting the job done. In that sense, Knox was definitely intolerant.
A man sent to row in French Galleys, and suchlike, for teaching the Truth in his own land, cannot always be in the mildest humour! I am not prepared to say that Knox had a soft temper; nor do I know that he had what we call an ill-temper. An ill nature he decidedly had not. Kind honest affections dwell in the much-enduring, hard-worn, ever-battling man. That he could rebuke Queens, and had such weight among those proud turbulent Nobles, proud enough whatever else they were; and could maintain to the 380end a kind of virtual Presidency and Sovereignty in that wild realm, he who was only ‘a subject born within the same:’ this of itself will prove to us that he was found, close at hand, to be no mean acrid man; but at heart a healthful, strong, sagacious man. Such alone can bear rule in that kind. They blame him for pulling-down cathedrals, and so forth, as if he were a seditious rioting demagogue: precisely the reverse is seen to be the fact, in regard to cathedrals and the rest of it, if we examine! Knox wanted no pulling-down of stone edifices; he wanted leprosy and darkness to be thrown out of the lives of men. Tumult was not his element; it was the tragic feature of his life that he was forced to dwell so much in that. Every such man is the born enemy of Disorder; hates to be in it: but what then? Smooth Falsehood is not Order; it is the general sum-total of Disorder. Order is Truth,—each thing standing on the basis that belongs to it: Order and Falsehood cannot subsist together.
A man sent to row in French galleys and similar places for teaching the truth in his own country can't always be in the best mood! I'm not saying Knox had a gentle temperament; nor do I know if he had what we'd consider a bad temper. He definitely did not have a bad nature. Kind, honest feelings reside in this tough, resilient, and ever-fighting man. The fact that he could rebuke queens and held such influence among those proud, rebellious nobles—who were proud enough, no matter what else they were—and could maintain a sort of virtual presidency and sovereignty in that chaotic realm, he who was merely ‘a subject born within the same,’ proves that he was not a mean or bitter man; but at heart, a healthy, strong, and wise one. Only such a person can lead in that way. They criticize him for tearing down cathedrals and so on, as if he were a rebellious, rioting demagogue: the exact opposite is true when we take a closer look at cathedrals and everything else! Knox didn't want to tear down stone buildings; he wanted to rid people’s lives of disease and darkness. Disorder was not what he thrived in; it was a tragic aspect of his life that he had to endure it so much. Every such man is instinctively against disorder; he despises being in it: but what can you do? Smooth falsehood is not order; it's the totality of disorder. Order is truth—everything standing on its rightful basis: order and falsehood cannot coexist.
Withal, unexpectedly enough, this Knox has a vein of drollery in him; which I like much, in combination with his other qualities. He has a true eye for the ridiculous. His History, with its rough earnestness, is curiously enlivened with this. When the two Prelates, entering Glasgow Cathedral, quarrel about precedence; march rapidly up, take to hustling one another, twitching one another’s rochets, and at last flourishing their crosiers like quarter-staves, it is a great sight for him everyway! Not mockery, scorn, bitterness alone; though there is enough of that too. But a true, loving, illuminating laugh mounts-up over the earnest visage; not a loud laugh; you would say, a laugh in the eyes most of all. An honest-hearted, brotherly man; brother to the high, brother also to the low; sincere in his sympathy with both. He has his pipe of Bourdeaux too, we find, in that old Edinburgh house of his; a cheery social man, with faces that loved him! They go far wrong who think this Knox was a gloomy, spasmodic, shrieking fanatic. Not at all: he is one of the solidest of men. Practical, cautious-hopeful, patient; a most shrewd, observing, quietly discerning man. In fact, he has very much the type of character we assign to the 381Scotch at present: a certain sardonic taciturnity is in him; insight enough; and a stouter heart than he himself knows of. He has the power of holding his peace over many things which do not vitally concern him,—“They? what are they?” But the thing which does vitally concern him, that thing he will speak of; and in a tone the whole world shall be made to hear: all the more emphatic for his long silence.
Unexpectedly enough, Knox has a sense of humor that I really like, especially when combined with his other qualities. He has a genuine eye for the ridiculous. His History, while serious, is oddly brightened by this. When the two Prelates enter Glasgow Cathedral and argue about who takes precedence, rushing in, shoving each other, tugging at each other’s robes, and finally waving their crosiers like they’re in a brawl, it’s quite a sight for him! It’s not just mockery, scorn, or bitterness, though there’s plenty of that too. Instead, a sincere, illuminating laugh shines through his serious expression; it’s not loud, more of a laugh in the eyes. He’s a genuine, brotherly man; a brother to the high and low alike, earnest in his empathy for both. He also has his pipe of Bordeaux in his old Edinburgh house; a sociable guy, he was well-loved! Those who think this Knox was a gloomy, frenzied fanatic are mistaken; he’s one of the most solid men. Practical, cautiously optimistic, patient; he’s incredibly perceptive, observant, and quietly insightful. In fact, he closely resembles the kind of character we associate with the 381Scots today: there’s a certain sardonic quietness in him, enough insight, and a stronger heart than he realizes. He can keep quiet about many things that don’t concern him deeply—“They? What are they?” But the things that truly matter to him, he will speak about, and in a voice the whole world will hear; all the more powerful because of his long silence.
This Prophet of the Scotch is to me no hateful man!—He had a sore fight of an existence: wrestling with Popes and Principalities; in defeat, contention, life-long struggle; rowing as a galley-slave, wandering as an exile. A sore fight: but he won it. “Have you hope?” they asked him in his last moment, when he could no longer speak. He lifted his finger, ‘pointed upwards with his finger,’ and so died. Honour to him! His works have not died. The letter of his work dies, as of all men’s; but the spirit of it never.
This Scotch Prophet is not a man I despise! He had a tough life: battling against Popes and authorities; facing defeats, ongoing conflicts, and a lifelong struggle; working like a galley slave, and living as an exile. It was a tough fight, but he won it. "Do you have hope?" they asked him in his final moments when he could no longer speak. He lifted his finger, pointed upward, and passed away. Respect to him! His works continue to live on. The written part of his work may fade away, like everyone else's, but the essence of it never does.
One word more as to the letter of Knox’s work. The unforgivable offence in him is, that he wished to set-up Priests over the head of Kings. In other words he strove to make the Government of Scotland a Theocracy. This indeed is properly the sum of his offences, the essential sin; for which what pardon can there be? It is most true, he did, at bottom, consciously or unconsciously, mean a Theocracy, or Government of God. He did mean that Kings and Prime Ministers, and all manner of persons, in public or private, diplomatising or whatever else they might be doing, should walk according to the Gospel of Christ, and understand that this was their Law, supreme over all laws. He hoped once to see such a thing realised; and the Petition, Thy Kingdom come, no longer an empty word. He was sore grieved when he saw greedy worldly Barons clutch hold of the Church’s property; when he expostulated that it was not secular property, that it was spiritual property, and should be turned to true churchly uses, education, schools, worship;—and the Regent Murray had to answer, with a shrug of the shoulders, “It is a devout imagination!” This was Knox’s scheme of right and truth; this he zealously endeavoured after, to realise it. If we think this scheme of truth was too 382narrow, was not true, we may rejoice that he could not realise it; that it remained after two centuries of effort, unrealisable, and is a ‘devout imagination’ still. But how shall we blame him for struggling to realise it? Theocracy, Government of God, is precisely the thing to be struggled for! All Prophets, zealous Priests, are there for that purpose. Hildebrand wished a Theocracy; Cromwell wished it, fought for it; Mahomet attained it. Nay, is it not what all zealous men, whether called Priests, Prophets, or whatsoever else called, do essentially wish, and must wish? That right and truth, or God’s Law, reign supreme among men, this is the Heavenly Ideal (well named in Knox’s time, and namable in all times, a revealed ‘Will of God’) towards which the Reformer will insist that all be more and more approximated. All true Reformers, as I said, are by the nature of them Priests, and strive for a Theocracy.
One last thing about Knox’s work. His unforgivable offense was that he wanted to place Priests above Kings. In other words, he aimed to turn the Government of Scotland into a Theocracy. This is essentially the core of his wrongdoing, the fundamental sin; what kind of forgiveness could there be for that? It’s true that, whether he realized it or not, he intended to create a Theocracy, a Government of God. He believed that Kings, Prime Ministers, and anyone in public or private roles, whether negotiating or doing anything else, should follow the Gospel of Christ, recognizing that this was the ultimate Law above all others. He once hoped to see this come to fruition, making the Petition, Thy Kingdom come, more than just empty words. He was deeply upset when he saw greedy worldly Barons taking hold of the Church’s assets; he protested that it wasn’t secular property, but spiritual property that should be used for true church purposes—education, schools, worship. The Regent Murray simply shrugged and replied, “It’s just a devout imagination!” This was Knox’s vision of right and truth, and he passionately worked to achieve it. If we believe that this vision of truth was too 382narrow or incorrect, we can be thankful that he couldn’t make it happen; that it remained unattainable after two centuries of effort and is still just a ‘devout imagination’. But how can we blame him for trying to bring it to life? Theocracy, the Government of God, is exactly what we should strive for! All Prophets and passionate Priests exist for that purpose. Hildebrand desired a Theocracy; Cromwell sought it and fought for it; Mahomet achieved it. Isn't it what all passionate individuals, whether called Priests, Prophets, or by any other name, inherently wish for? That right and truth, or God’s Law, should reign supreme among people—that is the Heavenly Ideal (appropriately named in Knox’s time and relevant in all eras, it is a revealed ‘Will of God’) toward which Reformers will continually strive to move closer. All true Reformers, as I mentioned, are inherently Priests, working toward a Theocracy.
How far such Ideals can ever be introduced into Practice, and at what point our impatience with their non-introduction ought to begin, is always a question. I think we may say safely, Let them introduce themselves as far as they can contrive to do it! If they are the true faith of men, all men ought to be more or less impatient always where they are not found introduced. There will never be wanting Regent Murrays enough to shrug their shoulders, and say, “A devout imagination!” We will praise the Hero-priest, rather, who does what is in him to bring them in; and wears out, in toil, calumny, contradiction, a noble life, to make a God’s Kingdom of this Earth. The Earth will not become too godlike!
How far these ideals can be put into action, and when we should start feeling impatient about their lack of implementation, is always a question. I think it’s safe to say, let them introduce themselves as much as they can! If they are genuinely the true beliefs of humanity, everyone should feel some level of impatience wherever they aren’t present. There will always be enough people like Regent Murray who will just shrug and say, “A fanciful thought!” Instead, we should commend the hero-priest who does everything in their power to bring these ideals to life, enduring hard work, slander, and opposition, and dedicating their noble life to creating a God’s Kingdom on Earth. The Earth can never be too divine!
LECTURE V
LECTURE 5
THE HERO AS A MAN OF LETTERS. JOHNSON, ROUSSEAU, BURNS.
[Tuesday, 19th May 1840]
[Tuesday, May 19, 1840]
Hero-gods, Prophets, Poets, Priests are forms of Heroism that belong to the old ages, make their appearance in the remotest times; some of them have ceased to be possible long since, and cannot any more show themselves in this world. The Hero as Man of Letters, again, of which class we are to speak today, is altogether a product of these new ages; and so long as the wondrous art of Writing, or of Ready-writing which we call Printing, subsists, he may be expected to continue, as one of the main forms of Heroism for all future ages. He is, in various respects, a very singular phenomenon.
Hero gods, Prophets, Poets, and Priests are types of Heroism that belong to ancient times; they emerged in the most distant past. Some of them have long since become impossible and can no longer appear in this world. The Hero as Man of Letters, which is our focus today, is a completely modern creation; as long as the incredible art of Writing, or Ready-writing, which we refer to as Printing, continues, he is expected to remain a prominent form of Heroism for all future generations. In many ways, he is a very unique phenomenon.
He is new, I say; he has hardly lasted above a century in the world yet. Never, till about a hundred years ago, was there seen any figure of a Great Soul living apart in that anomalous manner; endeavouring to speak-forth the inspiration that was in him by Printed Books, and find place and subsistence by what the world would please to give him for doing that. Much had been sold and bought, and left to make its own bargain in the marketplace; but the inspired wisdom of a Heroic Soul never till then, in that naked manner. He, with his copy-rights and copy-wrongs, in his squalid garret, in his rusty coat; ruling (for this is what he does), from his grave, after death, whole nations and generations who would, or would not, give him bread while living,—is a rather curious spectacle! Few shapes of Heroism can be more unexpected.
He’s new, I say; he’s only been in the world for a little over a hundred years. Never before, until about a century ago, did anyone see a Great Soul living in such an unusual way; trying to express the inspiration inside him through printed books, and finding a place to live and survive based on what the world would give him for doing that. Much has been sold and traded, left to fend for itself in the marketplace; but the inspired wisdom of a Heroic Soul had never been presented so openly before that. He, with his copyrights and disputes, in his rundown attic, wearing his worn-out coat; ruling (and this is what he does), from his grave, whole nations and generations who wouldn’t or couldn’t support him while he was alive—this is quite an interesting sight! Few examples of Heroism could be more surprising.
Alas, the Hero from of old has had to cramp himself into strange shapes: the world knows not well at any time what to do with him, so foreign is his aspect in the world! It seemed absurd to us, that men, in their rude admiration, should take some wise great Odin for a god, and worship him as such, some wise great Mahomet 384for one god-inspired, and religiously follow his Law for twelve centuries: but that a wise great Johnson, a Burns, a Rousseau, should be taken for some idle non-descript, extant in the world to amuse idleness, and have a few coins and applauses thrown in, that he might live thereby; this perhaps, as before hinted, will one day seem a still absurder phasis of things!—Meanwhile, since it is the spiritual always that determines the material, this same Man-of-Letters Hero must be regarded as our most important modern person. He, such as he may be, is the soul of all. What he teachers, the whole world will do and make. The world’s manner of dealing with him is the most significant feature of the world’s general position. Looking well at his life, we may get a glance, as deep as is readily possible for us, into the life of those singular centuries which have produced him, in which we ourselves live and work.
Unfortunately, the hero from the past has had to fit himself into strange forms: the world never quite knows what to do with him, so different is he in the modern world! It seems ridiculous to us that people, in their rough admiration, would take a wise great Odin for a god and worship him as such, or take a wise great Muhammad for a divinely inspired leader and religiously follow his Law for twelve centuries. Yet a wise great Johnson, a Burns, a Rousseau, should be seen as mere entertainers, existing just to pass the time, with a few coins and applause thrown in so they can get by; this might one day, as mentioned before, seem an even more absurd situation! In the meantime, since it is the spiritual that always shapes the material, this same literary hero must be seen as our most important modern figure. He, whatever he may be, is the essence of everything. What he teaches, the entire world will act upon and create. The world’s way of treating him is the most significant aspect of its overall stance. By carefully examining his life, we may gain a glimpse, as deep as we can, into the extraordinary centuries that have produced him, in which we ourselves live and work.
There are genuine Men of Letters, and not genuine; as in every kind there is a genuine and a spurious. If Hero be taken to mean genuine, then I say the Hero as Man of Letters will be found discharging a function for us which is ever honourable, ever the highest; and was once well known to be the highest. He is uttering-forth, in such a way as he has, the inspired soul of him; all that a man, in any case, can do. I say inspired; for what we call ‘originality,’ ‘sincerity,’ ‘genius,’ the heroic quality we have no good name for, signifies that. The Hero is he who lives in the inward sphere of things, in the True, Divine and Eternal, which exists always, unseen to most, under the Temporary, Trivial: his being is in that; he declares that abroad, by act or speech as it may be, in declaring himself abroad. His life, as we said before, is a piece of the everlasting heart of Nature herself: all men’s life is,—but the weak many know not the fact, and are untrue to it, in most times; the strong few are strong, heroic, perennial, because it cannot be hidden from them. The Man of Letters, like every Hero, is there to proclaim this in such sort as he can. Intrinsically it is the same function which the old generations named a man Prophet, Priest, Divinity for doing; which all manner of Heroes, by speech or by act, are sent into the world to do.
There are true Men of Letters and those who aren't; just like in any category, there's the genuine and the fake. If we consider Hero to mean authentic, then I argue that the Hero as a Man of Letters fulfills a role for us that's always honorable and the highest; it was once widely recognized as the highest. He expresses, in his unique way, his inspired essence; all that a person can achieve, in any sense. I say inspired; because what we refer to as ‘originality,’ ‘sincerity,’ ‘genius,’ the heroic quality that we don’t have a solid term for, means that. The Hero is someone who resides in the inner realm of existence, in the True, Divine, and Eternal, which is always present, though mostly unseen beneath the Temporary and Trivial: his true essence is in that; he makes this known outwardly, through his actions or words, by presenting himself. His life, as we mentioned before, is a part of the everlasting core of Nature itself: everyone’s life is connected to it,—but the weak majority often overlook this truth and betray it most of the time; the strong few are robust, heroic, and enduring because this truth cannot be concealed from them. The Man of Letters, like every Hero, is there to share this as best as he can. Essentially, it is the same role that earlier generations termed as Prophet, Priest, or Divine for fulfilling; which all kinds of Heroes, through speech or action, are sent into the world to accomplish.
385Fichte the German Philosopher delivered, some forty years ago at Erlangen, a highly remarkable Course of Lectures on this subject: ‘Ueber das Wesen des Gelehrten, On the Nature of the Literary Man.’ Fichte, in conformity with the Transcendental Philosophy, of which he was a distinguished teacher, declares first: That all things which we see or work with in this Earth, especially we ourselves and all persons, are as a kind of vesture or sensuous Appearance: that under all there lies, as the essence of them, what he calls the ‘Divine Idea of the World;’ this is the Reality which ‘lies at the bottom of all Appearance.’ To the mass of men no such Divine Idea is recognisable in the world; they live merely, says Fichte, among the superficialities, practicalities and shows of the world, not dreaming that there is anything divine under them. But the Man of Letters is sent hither specially that he may discern for himself, and make manifest to us, this same Divine Idea: in every new generation it will manifest itself in a new dialect; and he is there for the purpose of doing that. Such is Fichte’s phraseology; with which we need not quarrel. It is his way of naming what I here, by other words, am striving imperfectly to name; what there is at present no name for: The unspeakable Divine Significance, full of splendour, of wonder and terror, that lies in the being of every man, of every thing,—the Presence of the God who made every man and thing. Mahomet taught this in his dialect; Odin in his: it is the thing which all thinking hearts, in one dialect or another, are here to teach.
385Fichte, the German philosopher, gave a remarkable series of lectures on this topic about forty years ago in Erlangen titled ‘Ueber das Wesen des Gelehrten, On the Nature of the Literary Man.’ Fichte, who was a prominent figure in Transcendental Philosophy, begins by stating that all things we see or interact with on this Earth, especially ourselves and other people, are like a kind of clothing or sensory appearances. Beneath all of this lies what he refers to as the ‘Divine Idea of the World’; this is the reality that underlies all appearances. For most people, such a Divine Idea isn't recognizable in the world; they simply navigate through the surface-level aspects and practicalities of life, unaware that there's anything divine beneath them. However, the man of letters is here specifically to recognize and reveal this Divine Idea: it will express itself in new ways with each generation, and he is there to articulate that. This is Fichte’s way of describing it, which we need not dispute. It’s his method of labeling what I’m trying, though imperfectly, to express here; it's something that currently lacks a name: the indescribable Divine Significance, filled with brilliance, wonder, and terror, that exists in every individual and in everything—the presence of the God who created every person and thing. Mahomet taught this in his way; Odin in his: it’s the universal truth that all thoughtful individuals, in one form or another, are here to share.
Fichte calls the Man of Letters, therefore, a Prophet, or as he prefers to phrase it, a Priest, continually unfolding the Godlike to men: Men of Letters are a perpetual Priesthood, from age to age, teaching all men that a God is still present in their life; that all ‘Appearance,’ whatsoever we see in the world, is but as a vesture for the ‘Divine Idea of the World,’ for ‘that which lies at the bottom of Appearance.’ In the true Literary Man there is thus ever, acknowledged or not by the world, a sacredness: he is the light of the world; the world’s Priest:—guiding it, like a sacred Pillar of Fire, in its dark pilgrimage through the waste of Time. Fichte discriminates 386with sharp zeal the true Literary Man, what we here call the Hero as Man of Letters, from multitudes of false unheroic. Whoever lives not wholly in this Divine Idea, or living partially in it, struggles not, as for the one good, to live wholly in it,—he is, let him live where else he like, in what pomps and prosperities he like, no Literary Man; he is, says Fichte, a ‘Bungler, Stümper.’ Or at best, if he belong to the prosaic provinces, he may be a ‘Hodman;’ Fichte even calls him elsewhere a ‘Nonentity,’ and has in short no mercy for him, no wish that he should continue happy among us! This is Fichte’s notion of the Man of Letters. It means, in its own form, precisely what we here mean.
Fichte describes the Man of Letters as a Prophet, or as he likes to say, a Priest, who continuously reveals the Divine to people. Men of Letters represent a constant Priesthood, teaching each generation that a God is still part of their lives; that everything we see in the world is merely a disguise for the ‘Divine Idea of the World,’ for ‘what lies beneath Appearance.’ In the true Literary Man, whether recognized by the world or not, there is always a sense of sacredness: he is the light of the world; the world’s Priest—leading it, like a sacred Pillar of Fire, through its dark journey across time. Fichte distinguishes the true Literary Man, whom we refer to as the Hero as Man of Letters, from many false, unheroic ones. Anyone who doesn’t fully embrace this Divine Idea, or who partially lives in it yet does not strive for the ultimate good of fully embracing it—no matter where they live or how prosperous they may be—is not a Literary Man; Fichte labels them a ‘Bungler, Stümper.’ At best, if they belong to the more mundane realms, they might be a ‘Hodman’; Fichte even calls them a ‘Nonentity’ elsewhere and shows no mercy towards them, wishing they wouldn’t remain content among us! This is Fichte’s understanding of the Man of Letters. It signifies, in its own way, exactly what we mean here.
In this point of view, I consider that, for the last hundred years, by far the notablest of all Literary Men is Fichte’s countryman, Goethe. To that man too, in a strange way, there was given what we may call a life in the Divine Idea of the World; vision of the inward divine mystery: and strangely, out of his Books, the world rises imaged once more as godlike, the workmanship and temple of a God. Illuminated all, not in fierce impure fire-splendour as of Mahomet, but in mild celestial radiance;—really a Prophecy in these most unprophetic times; to my mind, by far the greatest, though one of the quietest, among all the great things that have come to pass in them. Our chosen specimen of the Hero as Literary Man would be this Goethe. And it were a very pleasant plan for me here to discourse of his heroism: for I consider him to be a true Hero; heroic in what he said and did, and perhaps still more in what he did not say and did not do; to me a noble spectacle: a great heroic ancient man, speaking and keeping silence as an ancient Hero, in the guise of a most modern, high-bred, high-cultivated Man of Letters! We have had no such spectacle; no man capable of affording such, for the last hundred-and-fifty years.
From this perspective, I believe that, for the past hundred years, the most notable literary figure is Goethe, Fichte’s fellow countryman. In a unique way, he was granted what we might call a life guided by the Divine Idea of the World; a vision of the inner divine mystery. Strangely, through his books, the world re-emerges as godlike, a creation and temple of a God. Everything is illuminated, not in the fierce, impure fire of Mahomet, but in gentle celestial light; truly a prophecy in these times when prophecies are rare. In my opinion, he is by far the greatest, though one of the quietest, among all the remarkable events that have occurred. Our chosen example of the Hero as a literary figure would be Goethe. It would be a delightful plan for me to discuss his heroism here; I view him as a true Hero—heroic in what he expressed and accomplished, and perhaps even more so in what he chose not to say and do; to me, he represents a noble sight: a great, heroic figure from ancient times, speaking and remaining silent like an ancient Hero, but in the form of a very modern, sophisticated, and highly cultured Man of Letters! We haven't witnessed such a scene; no one has been capable of offering it in the last one hundred and fifty years.
But at present, such is the general state of knowledge about Goethe, it were worse than useless to attempt speaking of him in this case. Speak as I might, Goethe, to the great majority of you would remain problematic, vague; no impression but a false one could be realised. 387Him we must leave to future times. Johnson, Burns, Rousseau, three great figures from a prior time, from a far inferior state of circumstances, will suit us better here. Three men of the Eighteenth Century; the conditions of their life far more resemble what those of ours still are in England, than what Goethe’s in Germany were. Alas, these men did not conquer like him; they fought bravely, and fell. They were not heroic bringers of the light, but heroic seekers of it. They lived under galling conditions; struggling as under mountains of impediment, and could not unfold themselves into clearness, or victorious interpretation of that ‘Divine Idea.’ It is rather the Tombs of three Literary Heroes that I have to show you. There are the monumental heaps, under which three spiritual giants lie buried. Very mournful, but also great and full of interest for us. We will linger by them for a while.
But right now, the general understanding of Goethe is such that it would be more harmful than helpful to try to discuss him here. No matter how I talk about him, most of you would still find Goethe unclear and problematic; any impression formed would likely be a false one. 387 We’ll have to leave him for future generations. Johnson, Burns, and Rousseau—three significant figures from an earlier time and a much tougher set of circumstances—are more fitting for us to focus on here. These three men from the Eighteenth Century lived under conditions that resemble our own in England much more than Goethe’s did in Germany. Unfortunately, these men did not achieve victory like he did; they fought bravely and fell. They weren’t heroic bringers of light, but heroic seekers of it. They lived under oppressive conditions, struggling as if weighed down by mountains of obstacles, and they could not express themselves clearly or emerge victoriously in interpreting that ‘Divine Idea.’ What I have to share with you is more like the Tombs of three Literary Heroes. There are monumental mounds where these three spiritual giants are laid to rest. It’s very sad, but also profound and interesting for us. We’ll spend some time with them.
Complaint is often made, in these times, of what we call the disorganised condition of society: how ill many arranged forces of society fulfil their work; how many powerful forces are seen working in a wasteful, chaotic, altogether unarranged manner. It is too just a complaint, as we all know. But perhaps if we look at this of Books and the Writers of Books, we shall find here, as it were, the summary of all other disorganisation;—a sort of heart, from which, and to which, all other confusion circulates in the world! Considering what Book-writers do in the world, and what the world does with Book-writers, I should say, It is the most anomalous thing the world at present has to show.—We should get into a sea far beyond sounding, did we attempt to give account of this: but we must glance at it for the sake of our subject. The worst element in the life of these three Literary Heroes was, that they found their business and position such a chaos. On the beaten road there is tolerable travelling; but it is sore work, and many have to perish, fashioning a path through the impassable!
People often complain these days about what we call the disorganized state of society: how poorly many of its forces are aligned to get their jobs done; how powerful forces seem to be acting in a wasteful, chaotic, and completely uncoordinated way. This complaint is well-founded, as we all recognize. However, if we take a closer look at the situation concerning Books and the Writers of Books, we might find in it, so to speak, a summary of all other disorganization—a sort of heart from which all other confusion in the world spreads and to which it returns! Considering what book writers contribute to society and what society does with them, I would say it’s the most peculiar situation currently on display. We would dive into murky waters far beyond our depth if we tried to fully explain this, but we must touch on it for the sake of our topic. The toughest aspect of the lives of these three Literary Heroes was that they discovered their work and standing to be such a mess. On well-trodden paths, traveling is manageable; but it’s tough going, and many have to struggle to carve out a route through the impossible!
Our pious Fathers, feeling well what importance lay in the speaking of man to men, founded churches, made endowments, regulations; everywhere in the civilised world there is a Pulpit, environed with all manner of 388complex dignified appurtenances and furtherances, that therefrom a man with the tongue may, to best advantage, address his fellow-men. They felt that this was the most important thing; that without this there was no good thing. It is a right pious work, that of theirs; beautiful to behold! But now with the art of Writing, with the art of Printing, a total change has come over that business. The Writer of a Book, is not he a Preacher preaching not to this parish or that, on this day or that, but to all men in all times and places? Surely it is of the last importance that he do his work right, whoever do it wrong;—that the eye report not falsely, for then all the other members are astray! Well; how he may do his work, whether he do it right or wrong, or do it at all, is a point which no man in the world has taken the pains to think of. To a certain shopkeeper, trying to get some money for his books, if lucky, he is of some importance; to no other man of any. Whence he came, whither he is bound, by what ways he arrived, by what he might be furthered on his course, no one asks. He is an accident in society. He wanders like a wild Ishmaelite, in a world of which he is as the spiritual light, either the guidance or the misguidance!
Our devout ancestors understood how important it was for people to communicate with one another, so they established churches, created endowments, and set up regulations; all over the civilized world, there’s a pulpit surrounded by all sorts of elaborate decorations and enhancements, allowing someone to speak effectively to their fellow humans. They recognized this as the most crucial task; without it, nothing good could exist. Their efforts are truly commendable and beautiful to witness! But now, with the invention of writing and printing, everything has changed. A book's author isn’t just a preacher speaking to a specific congregation on a particular day; he’s addressing all people across all times and places. It’s incredibly important that he does his job well, whatever others might do wrong; if the eye reports inaccurately, then all the other faculties are misled! Yet, how he performs his role, whether he does it properly or poorly, or whether he does it at all, is something no one in the world seems to have considered. To a certain bookseller, trying to make some money off his works, he is somewhat significant; to no one else, he’s not. No one questions where he came from, where he’s headed, how he got there, or what might aid him on his journey. He is merely an accident in society, wandering like a wild Ishmaelite in a world where he serves as the spiritual light, whether directing others or leading them astray!
Certainly the art of writing is the most miraculous of all things man has devised. Odin’s Runes were the first form of the work of a Hero; Books, written words, are still miraculous Runes, of the latest form! In Books lies the soul of the whole Past Time; the articulate audible voice of the Past, when the body and material substance of it has altogether vanished like a dream. Mighty fleets and armies, harbours and arsenals, vast cities, high-domed, many-engined,—they are precious, great: but what do they become? Agamemnon, the many Agamemnons, Pericleses, and their Greece; all is gone now to some ruined fragments, dumb mournful wrecks and blocks: but the Books of Greece! There Greece, to every thinker, still very literally lives; can be called-up again into life. No magic Rune is stranger than a Book. All that Mankind has done, thought, gained or been: it is lying as in magic preservation in the pages of Books. They are the chosen possession of men.
Certainly, the art of writing is the most amazing thing humans have created. Odin’s Runes were the first version of a Hero's work; Books, written words, are still incredible Runes, in a modern form! Within Books lies the soul of all of history; the clear, spoken voice of the Past, even when its physical body has completely faded away like a dream. Mighty fleets and armies, harbors and arsenals, vast cities with high domes and complex machines—they are valuable and impressive: but what do they become? Agamemnon, the many Agamemnons, Pericles, and their Greece; all has now turned to crumbling fragments, silent, sorrowful wrecks and remnants: but the Books of Greece! In those Books, Greece still lives for every thinker; it can be brought back to life. No magic Rune is more extraordinary than a Book. Everything humanity has done, thought, achieved, or been—it is preserved like magic within the pages of Books. They are the treasured possession of humankind.
389Do not Books still accomplish miracles as Runes were fabled to do? They persuade men. Not the wretchedest circulating-library novel, which foolish girls thumb and con in remote villages but will help to regulate the actual practical weddings and households of those foolish girls. So ‘Celia’ felt, so ‘Clifford’ acted: the foolish Theorem of Life, stamped into those young brains, comes out as a solid Practice one day. Consider whether any Rune in the wildest imagination of Mythologist ever did such wonders as, on the actual firm Earth, some Books have done! What built St Paul’s Cathedral? Look at the heart of the matter, it was that divine Hebrew Book,—the word partly of the man Moses, an outlaw tending his Midianitish herds, four thousand years ago, in the wildernesses of Sinai! It is the strangest of things, yet nothing is truer. With the art of Writing, of which Printing is a simple, an inevitable and comparatively insignificant corollary, the true reign of miracles for mankind commenced. It related, with a wondrous new contiguity and perpetual closeness, the Past and Distant with the Present in time and place; all times and all places with this our actual Here and Now. All things were altered for men; all modes of important work of men: teaching, preaching, governing, and all else.
389Don’t Books still perform miracles like Runes were said to do? They influence people. Not even the most ridiculous novel from the library, which silly girls read and dream about in remote villages, can't help but affect the real marriages and households of those silly girls. So 'Celia' felt, and 'Clifford' acted: the foolish idea of Life, embedded in those young minds, eventually becomes solid reality. Think about whether any Rune from the wildest fantasies of Mythologists ever achieved wonders like some Books have done on this actual Earth! What constructed St Paul’s Cathedral? Looking closer at it, it was that divine Hebrew Book,—partly written by Moses, an outlaw tending his Midianite flocks, four thousand years ago in the deserts of Sinai! It’s the oddest thing, yet nothing is truer. With the art of Writing, of which Printing is a straightforward, inevitable, and fairly minor outcome, the true era of miracles for humanity began. It connected, in a remarkable new way with constant closeness, the Past and Distant with the Present in both time and space; all times and all places with our actual Here and Now. Everything changed for people; all important aspects of human work: teaching, preaching, governing, and everything else.
To look at Teaching, for instance. Universities are a notable, respectable product of the modern ages. Their existence too is modified, to the very basis of it, by the existence of Books. Universities arose while there were yet no Books procurable; while a man, for a single Book, had to give an estate of land. That, in those circumstances, when a man had some knowledge to communicate, he should do it by gathering the learners round him, face to face, was a necessity for him. If you wanted to know what Abelard knew, you must go and listen to Abelard. Thousands, as many as thirty-thousand, went to hear Abelard and that metaphysical theology of his. And now for any other teacher who had something of his own to teach, there was a great convenience opened: so many thousands eager to learn were already assembled yonder; of all places the best place for him was that. For any third teacher it was 390better still; and grew ever the better, the more teachers there came. It only needed now that the King took notice of this new phenomenon; combined or agglomerated the various schools into one school; gave it edifices, privileges, encouragements, and named it Universitas, or School of all Sciences: the University of Paris, in its essential characters, was there. The model of all subsequent Universities; which down even to these days, for six centuries now, have gone on to found themselves. Such, I conceive, was the origin of Universities.
To consider teaching, for example. Universities are a significant, respected product of modern times. Their very existence is shaped, fundamentally, by the presence of books. Universities emerged when books were not yet available; a person had to give up an entire estate just to get one book. In those circumstances, when someone had knowledge to share, gathering learners around him in person was a necessity. If you wanted to learn what Abelard knew, you had to go listen to him. Thousands, as many as thirty thousand, came to hear Abelard and his metaphysical theology. Now, for any other teacher with something to share, there was a great convenience: so many eager learners were already assembled there; it was the best place for him to be. For any third teacher, it was even better; it improved even more as more teachers arrived. It only needed the King to notice this new phenomenon; he combined the various schools into one, provided them with buildings, privileges, support, and named it Universitas, or School of all Sciences: thus, the University of Paris, in its essential form, was established. This was the model for all subsequent universities, which have continued to establish themselves for six centuries now. Such, I believe, was the origin of universities.
It is clear, however, that with this simple circumstance, facility of getting Books, the whole conditions of the business from top to bottom were changed. Once invent Printing, you metamorphosed all Universities, or superseded them! The Teacher needed not now to gather men personally round him, that he might speak to them what he knew: print it in a Book, and all learners far and wide, for a trifle, had it each at his own fireside, much more effectually to learn it!—Doubtless there is still peculiar virtue in Speech; even writers of Books may still, in some circumstances, find it convenient to speak also,—witness our present meeting here! There is, one would say, and must ever remain while man has a tongue, a distinct province for Speech as well as for Writing and Printing. In regard to all things this must remain; to Universities among others. But the limits of the two have nowhere yet been pointed out, ascertained; much less put in practice: the University which would completely take-in that great new fact, of the existence of Printed Books, and stand on a clear footing for the Nineteenth Century as the Paris one did for the Thirteenth, has not yet come into existence. If we think of it, all that a University, or final highest School can do for us, is still but what the first School began doing,—teach us to read. We learn to read, in various languages, in various sciences; we learn the alphabet and letters of all manner of Books. But the place where we go to get knowledge, even theoretic knowledge, is the Books themselves! It depends on what we read, after all manner of Professors have done their best for us. The true University of these days is a Collection of Books.
It’s clear, though, that with this simple fact—the ease of obtaining books—the entire landscape of education changed completely. Once printing was invented, it transformed all universities or even replaced them! Teachers no longer needed to gather students around them to share their knowledge; they could just print it in a book, and learners everywhere could easily access it at home, making it much more effective for them to learn! Sure, there's still unique value in spoken communication; even authors of books may find it useful to speak under certain circumstances—just like our meeting here today! There will always be a role for speech just as there is for writing and printing, as long as humans can talk. This must also hold true for universities. However, the boundaries between the two have yet to be clearly defined or put into practice. The university that fully embraces the significant reality of printed books and positions itself clearly for the nineteenth century, as the Paris one did for the thirteenth, has not yet been established. If we think about it, everything a university or the highest educational institution can do for us is still what the first school did—teach us to read. We learn to read in various languages and subjects; we learn the alphabet and the letters of all kinds of books. But the source of our knowledge, even theoretical knowledge, is the books themselves! Ultimately, it depends on what we read after all the professors have done their best for us. The true university of today is a collection of books.
391But to the Church itself, as I hinted already, all is changed, in its preaching, in its working, by the introduction of Books. The Church is the working recognised Union of our Priests or Prophets, of those who by wise teaching guide the souls of men. While there was no Writing, even while there was no Easy-writing or Printing, the preaching of the voice was the natural sole method of performing this. But now with Books!—He that can write a true Book, to persuade England, is not he the Bishop and Archbishop, the Primate of England and of All England? I many a time say, the writers of Newspapers, Pamphlets, Poems, Books, these are the real working effective Church of a modern country. Nay not only our preaching, but even our worship, is not it too accomplished by means of Printed Books? The noble sentiment which a gifted soul has clothed for us in melodious words, which brings melody into our hearts,—is not this essentially, if we will understand it, of the nature of worship? There are many, in all countries, who, in this confused time, have no other method of worship. He who, in any way, shows us better than we knew before that a lily of the fields is beautiful, does he not show it us as an effluence of the Fountain of all Beauty; as the handwriting, made visible there, of the great Maker of the Universe? He has sung for us, made us sing with him, a little verse of a sacred Psalm. Essentially so. How much more he who sings, who says, or in any way brings home to our heart the noble doings, feelings, darings and endurances of a brother man! He has verily touched our hearts as with a live coal from the altar. Perhaps there is no worship more authentic.
391But for the Church itself, as I already hinted, everything has changed in its preaching and its operations because of the introduction of Books. The Church represents the active, recognized Union of our Priests or Prophets, those who guide people's souls through wise teaching. When there were no Written texts, and even before Easy-writing or Printing, preaching by voice was the natural and only way to do this. But now with Books!—Isn't he who can write a true Book that convinces England the Bishop and Archbishop, the Primate of England and of All England? I often say that the writers of Newspapers, Pamphlets, Poems, Books—these are the real, effective Church of a modern country. Not only our preaching, but even our worship, is it not also completed through Printed Books? The noble sentiment expressed by a gifted person in beautiful words, which brings joy into our hearts—if we really think about it, isn't this basically an act of worship? Many people, in all countries, in this chaotic time, have no other way to worship. He who, in any way, shows us that a lily of the fields is beautiful, reveals it to us as an expression of the Source of all Beauty; as the handwriting made visible from the great Creator of the Universe? He has sung for us, made us sing along with him, a little verse from a sacred Psalm. Essentially so. How much more so for him who sings, who speaks, or who in any way brings to our hearts the noble actions, feelings, courage, and endurance of a fellow human being! He has truly touched our hearts as with a live coal from the altar. Perhaps there is no more authentic worship than this.
Literature, so far as it is Literature, is an ‘apocalypse of Nature,’ a revealing of the ‘open secret.’ It may well enough be named, in Fichte’s style; a ‘continuous revelation’ of the Godlike in the Terrestrial and Common. The Godlike does ever, in very truth, endure there; is brought out, now in this dialect, now in that, with various degrees of clearness: all true gifted Singers and Speakers are, consciously or unconsciously, doing so. The dark stormful indignation of a Byron, so wayward and perverse, may have touches of it; nay the 392withered mockery of a French sceptic,—his mockery of the False, a love and worship of the True. How much more the sphere-harmony of a Shakspeare, of a Goethe; the cathedral-music of a Milton! They are something too, those humble genuine lark-notes of a Burns,—skylark, starting from the humble furrow, far overhead into the blue depths, and singing to us so genuinely there! For all true singing is of the nature of worship; as indeed all true working may be said to be,—whereof such singing is but the record, and fit melodious representation, to us. Fragments of a real ‘Church Liturgy’ and ‘Body of Homilies,’ strangely disguised from the common eye, are to be found weltering in that huge froth-ocean of Printed Speech we loosely call Literature! Books are our Church too.
Literature, as it truly is, is an 'apocalypse of Nature,' revealing the 'open secret.' It can be aptly referred to, in Fichte’s terms, as a 'continuous revelation' of the divine within the earthly and ordinary. The divine truly endures there, expressed through various dialects with differing degrees of clarity: all genuinely gifted singers and speakers are, whether they realize it or not, doing this. The intense, tumultuous anger of a Byron, so unconventional and twisted, may have hints of it; even the withered mockery of a French skeptic—his scorn for the False reflects a love and reverence for the True. How much more is it present in the harmonious sphere of a Shakespeare, a Goethe; the cathedral-like music of a Milton! There’s also something special about those humble, sincere notes of a Burns—the skylark that rises from the simple furrow, soaring high into the blue sky and singing to us so genuinely there! For all true singing is a form of worship; indeed, all true working can be said to be that way—of which such singing is merely the record and fitting melodic representation for us. Fragments of a real 'Church Liturgy' and 'Body of Homilies,' strangely hidden from the common eye, can be found swirling in that vast frothy ocean of Printed Speech we casually call Literature! Books are our Church too.
Or turning now to the Government of men. Witenagemote, old Parliament, was a great thing. The affairs of the nation were there deliberated and decided; what we were to do as a nation. But does not, though the name Parliament subsists, the parliamentary debate go on now, everywhere and at all times, in a far more comprehensive way, out of Parliament altogether? Burke said there were Three Estates in Parliament; but, in the Reporters’ Gallery yonder, there sat a Fourth Estate more important far than they all. It is not a figure of speech, or a witty saying; it is a literal fact,—very momentous to us in these times. Literature is our Parliament too. Printing, which comes necessarily out of Writing, I say often, is equivalent to Democracy: invent Writing, Democracy is inevitable. Writing brings Printing; brings universal every-day extempore Printing, as we see at present. Whoever can speak, speaking now to the whole nation, becomes a power, a branch of government, with inalienable weight in law-making, in all acts of authority. It matters not what rank he has, what revenues or garnitures: the requisite thing is, that he have a tongue which others will listen to; this and nothing more is requisite. The nation is governed by all that has tongue in the nation: Democracy is virtually there. Add only, that whatsoever power exists will have itself, by and by, organised; working secretly under bandages, obscurations, obstructions, 393it will never rest till it get to work free, unencumbered, visible to all. Democracy virtually extant will insist on becoming palpably extant.—
Or turning now to the Government of people. The Witenagemote, the old Parliament, was significant. The nation's issues were debated and decided there; it determined what we, as a nation, should do. However, even though the name Parliament still exists, isn't the parliamentary debate happening now, everywhere and all the time, in a much broader way, outside of Parliament entirely? Burke mentioned there were Three Estates in Parliament; but in the Reporters’ Gallery over there, there's a Fourth Estate that's much more important than all of them. This is not just a clever phrase or saying; it's a literal fact—very significant for us today. Literature is also our Parliament. I often say that printing, which necessarily comes from writing, is equivalent to democracy: invent writing, and democracy is bound to follow. Writing leads to printing; it brings universal, everyday, spontaneous printing, as we see now. Anyone who can speak, addressing the entire nation, becomes a power, a branch of government, with undeniable influence in law-making and all acts of authority. It doesn't matter what their status is, what wealth or possessions they have; the essential thing is that they have a voice that others will listen to; that's all that's necessary. The nation is governed by everyone who has a voice within it: democracy is essentially there. Just add that any power that exists will eventually organize itself; working quietly under constraints, obscurity, and obstacles, it will not rest until it can operate freely, openly, and visibly to all. The democracy that is practically existing will demand to become clearly present.—
On all sides, are we not driven to the conclusion that, of the things which man can do or make here below, by far the most momentous, wonderful and worthy are the things we call Books! Those poor bits of rag-paper with black ink on them;—from the Daily Newspaper to the sacred Hebrew Book, what have they not done, what are they not doing!—For indeed, whatever be the outward form of the thing (bits of paper, as we say, and black ink), is it not verily, at bottom, the highest act of man’s faculty that produces a Book? It is the Thought of man; the true thaumaturgic virtue; by which man works all things whatsoever. All that he does, and brings to pass, is the vesture of a Thought. This London City, with all its houses, palaces, steam-engines, cathedrals, and huge immeasurable traffic and tumult, what is it but a Thought, but millions of Thoughts made into One;—a huge immeasurable Spirit of a Thought, embodied in brick, in iron, smoke, dust, Palaces, Parliaments, Hackney Coaches, Katherine Docks, and the rest of it! Not a brick was made but some man had to think of the making of that brick.—The thing we called ‘bits of paper with traces of black ink,’ is the purest embodiment a Thought of man can have. No wonder it is, in all ways, the activest and noblest.
On all sides, aren't we led to the conclusion that, of all the things people can do or create here on Earth, the most significant, amazing, and deserving are the things we call Books? Those seemingly worthless scraps of paper with black ink on them;—from daily newspapers to the sacred Hebrew Book, what haven’t they done, and what are they not doing!—For really, no matter what their outward form is (bits of paper, as we say, and black ink), isn’t it truly, at its core, the highest achievement of human creativity that produces a Book? It is the Thought of humanity; the true magical force; by which people create all things. Everything they do and accomplish is just the manifestation of a Thought. This city of London, with all its buildings, palaces, steam engines, cathedrals, and massive, bustling traffic and chaos, what is it but a Thought, a multitude of Thoughts combined into One;—a vast, immeasurable Spirit of a Thoughts, embodied in brick, iron, smoke, dust, palaces, parliaments, hackney cabs, Katherine Docks, and everything else! No brick was made without someone needing to think of the creation of that brick.—What we refer to as 'bits of paper with marks of black ink' is the purest embodiment that human Thought can achieve. It’s no surprise that it is the most active and noble in every way.
All this, of the importance and supreme importance of the Man of Letters in modern Society, and how the Press is to such a degree superseding the Pulpit, the Senate, the Senatus Academicus and much else, has been admitted for a good while; and recognised often enough, in late times, with a sort of sentimental triumph and wonderment. It seems to me, the Sentimental by and by will have to give place to the Practical. If Men of Letters are so incalculably influential, actually performing such work for us from age to age, and even from day to day, then I think we may conclude that Men of Letters will not always wander like unrecognised unregulated Ishmaelites among us! Whatsoever thing, as I said above, has virtual unnoticed power will castoff 394its wrappages, bandages, and step-forth one day with palpably articulated, universally visible power. That one man wear the clothes, and take the wages, of a function which is done by quite another: there can be no profit in this; this is not right, it is wrong. And yet, alas, the making of it right,—what a business, for long times to come! Sure enough, this that we call Organisation of the Literary Guild is still a great way off, encumbered with all manner of complexities. If you asked me what were the best possible organisation for the Men of Letters in modern society; the arrangement of furtherance and regulation, grounded the most accurately on the actual facts of their position and of the world’s position,—I should beg to say that the problem far exceeded my faculty! It is not one man’s faculty; it is that of many successive men turned earnestly upon it, that will bring-out even an approximate solution. What the best arrangement were, none of us could say. But if you ask, Which is the worst? I answer: This which we now have, that Chaos should sit umpire in it; this is the worst. To the best, or any good one, there is yet a long way.
All this highlights the importance of the Man of Letters in modern society and how the Press is increasingly replacing the Pulpit, the Senate, the Senatus Academicus, and much more. This has been acknowledged for quite some time and often recognized with a mix of sentimental pride and surprise. However, I believe that sentimentality will eventually need to give way to practicality. If Men of Letters are so incredibly influential, consistently doing significant work for us over the years and even from day to day, then it’s reasonable to conclude that they won’t always remain like unrecognized, unregulated wanderers among us! Whatever has an unnoticed power will eventually shed its limitations and emerge with clearly defined, visible strength. It’s simply not right for one person to wear the role and take the benefits of a job that someone else is actually doing. This situation is neither profitable nor fair, and yet, unfortunately, setting it right—what a challenge that will be for a long time to come! We are still far from achieving what we call the Organization of the Literary Guild, which is tangled up with all kinds of complexities. If you were to ask me what the best possible organization for Men of Letters in modern society would be—the setup for their support and regulation based on the actual facts of their situation and the world’s—I would have to say that the problem is beyond my capabilities! It requires the efforts of many dedicated individuals over time to come up with even a rough solution. None of us can say what the best arrangement would be. But if you ask what the worst is, I would say: the current state we have, where chaos acts as the judge; that is definitely the worst. We still have a long way to go to reach anything better or even just good.
One remark I must not omit, That royal or parliamentary grants of money are by no means the chief thing wanted! To give our Men of Letters stipends, endowments and all furtherance of cash, will do little towards the business. On the whole, one is weary of hearing about the omnipotence of money. I will say rather that, for a genuine man, it is no evil to be poor; that there ought to be Literary Men poor,—to show whether they are genuine or not! Mendicant Orders, bodies of good men doomed to beg, were instituted in the Christian Church; a most natural and even necessary development of the spirit of Christianity. It was itself founded on Poverty, on Sorrow, Contradiction, Crucifixion, every species of worldly Distress and Degradation. We may say, that he who has not known those things, and learned from them the priceless lessons they have to teach, has missed a good opportunity of schooling. To beg, and go barefoot, in coarse woollen cloak with a rope round your loins, and be despised of all the world, was no beautiful business;—nor an 395honourable one in any eye, till the nobleness of those who did so had made it honoured of some!
One thing I have to mention is that royal or parliamentary funding is definitely not the most important thing we need! Giving our writers salaries, grants, and any financial support won’t do much for the cause. Overall, I’m tired of hearing about the power of money. I’d rather say that for a true person, being poor isn’t a bad thing; there should be poor Literary Men—to show whether they're genuine or not! Mendicant Orders, groups of good people destined to beg, were established in the Christian Church; a very natural and even necessary result of the spirit of Christianity. It was founded on Poverty, Sorrow, Contradiction, Crucifixion, and all kinds of worldly Distress and Degradation. We can say that someone who hasn’t experienced these things and learned from the invaluable lessons they offer has missed a great chance for growth. To beg, to go barefoot, in a rough wool cloak with a rope around your waist, and to be scorned by everyone wasn’t a beautiful experience—and it certainly wasn’t seen as honorable until the nobility of those who did it had made it respectable in some eyes!
Begging is not in our course at the present time: but for the rest of it, who will say that a Johnson is not perhaps the better for being poor? It is needful for him, at all rates, to know that outward profit, that success of any kind is not the goal he has to aim at. Pride, vanity, ill-conditioned egoism of all sorts, are bred in his heart, as in every heart; need, above all, to be cast-out of his heart,—to be, with whatever pangs, torn-out of it, cast-forth from it, as a thing worthless. Byron, born rich and noble, made-out even less than Burns, poor and plebeian. Who knows but, in that same ‘best possible organisation’ as yet far off, Poverty may still enter as an important element? What if our Men of Letters, Men setting-up to be Spiritual Heroes, were still then, as they now are, a kind of ‘involuntary monastic order;’ bound still to this same ugly Poverty,—till they had tried what was in it too, till they had learned to make it too do for them! Money, in truth, can do much, but it cannot do all. We must know the province of it, and confine it; and even spurn it back, when it wishes to get farther.
Begging isn't part of our agenda right now, but who can say that a Johnson isn't maybe better off being poor? It's essential for him, at the very least, to understand that external success and profit are not the goals he should strive for. Pride, vanity, and all kinds of bad egoism grow in his heart, just like in everyone's heart; he needs, above all, to be rid of it—to painfully tear it out, to discard it as if it were worthless. Byron, born wealthy and noble, accomplished even less than Burns, who was poor and from the lower class. Who knows, in that ideal 'best possible organization' that still lies ahead, if Poverty might still play a crucial role? What if our Writers and those who claim to be Spiritual Heroes were still, just like today, a kind of 'involuntary monastic order'; still bound to that same ugly Poverty—until they had experienced what's in it too, until they had learned to make it work for them? Money can do a lot, but it can't do everything. We need to understand its limits and keep it in check, even pushing it away when it tries to go further.
Besides, were the money-furtherances, the proper season for them, the fit assigner of them, all settled,—how is the Burns to be recognised that merits these? He must pass through the ordeal, and prove himself. This ordeal; this wild welter of a chaos which is called Literary Life; this too is a kind of ordeal! There is clear truth in the idea that a struggle from the lower classes of society, towards the upper regions and rewards of society, must ever continue. Strong men are born there, who ought to stand elsewhere than there. The manifold, inextricably complex, universal struggle of these constitutes, and must constitute, what is called the progress of society. For Men of Letters, as for all other sorts of men. How to regulate that struggle? There is the whole question. To leave it as it is, at the mercy of blind Chance; a whirl of distracted atoms, one cancelling the other; one of the thousand arriving saved, nine-hundred-and-ninety-nine lost by the way; your royal Johnson languishing inactive in garrets, or 396harnessed to the yoke of Printer Cave; your Burns dying broken-hearted as a Gauger; your Rousseau driven into mad exasperation, kindling French Revolutions by his paradoxes: this, as we said, is clearly enough the worst regulation. The best, alas, is far from us!
Besides, if the financial support, the right timing, and the proper allocation are all sorted out—how is the talent worth these rewards supposed to be recognized? They have to go through a trial and prove themselves. This trial; this chaotic mess known as Literary Life; this too is a kind of trial! There's definitely some truth in the idea that the struggle of the lower classes to rise to the upper tiers and rewards of society must always continue. Strong individuals are born there, who should be standing somewhere better. The complex, intertwined struggle of these individuals is what shapes, and must shape, what we call social progress. This applies to Men of Letters just like it does to all other types of people. The real question is how to manage that struggle? Leaving it as it is, at the mercy of blind Chance—a whirlwind of chaotic elements, where one cancels out the other; one in a thousand makes it through, while nine hundred and ninety-nine are lost along the way; your royal Johnson languishing inactive in garrets, or 396tied to the yoke of Printer Cave; your Burns dying heartbroken as a gauger; your Rousseau driven into madness, igniting French Revolutions with his paradoxes: this, as we said, is clearly the worst way to regulate it. The best solution, unfortunately, is still far from us!
And yet there can be no doubt but it is coming; advancing on us, as yet hidden in the bosom of centuries: this is a prophecy one can risk. For so soon as men get to discern the importance of a thing, they do infallibly set about arranging it, facilitating, forwarding it; and rest not till, in some approximate degree, they have accomplished that. I say, of all Priesthoods, Aristocracies, Governing Classes at present extant in the world, there is no class comparable for importance to that Priesthood of the Writers of Books. This is a fact which he who runs may read,—and draw inferences from. “Literature will take care of itself,” answered Mr Pitt, when applied-to for some help for Burns. “Yes,” adds Mr Southey, “it will take care of itself; and of you too, if you do not look to it!”
And yet there's no doubt it's coming; approaching us, still hidden in the depths of history: this is a prediction worth making. Because as soon as people recognize the significance of something, they inevitably start arranging, facilitating, and promoting it; and they won't stop until, to some extent, they've achieved that. I believe, of all the religious leaders, aristocracies, and governing classes currently in the world, none is as important as the Priesthood of the Publishers of Books. This is a truth that anyone can see — and draw conclusions from. “Literature will manage itself,” Mr. Pitt responded when asked for support for Burns. “Yes,” Mr. Southey chimed in, “it will manage itself; and you too, if you don't pay attention!”
The result to individual Men of Letters is not the momentous one; they are but individuals, an infinitesimal fraction of the great body; they can struggle on, and live or else die, as they have been wont. But it deeply concerns the whole society, whether it will set its light on high places, to walk thereby; or trample it under foot, and scatter it in all ways of wild waste (not without conflagration), as heretofore! Light is the one thing wanted for the world. Put wisdom in the head of the world, the world will fight its battle victoriously, and be the best world man can make it. I call this anomaly of a disorganic Literary Class the heart of all other anomalies, at once product and parent; some good arrangement for that would be as the punctum saliens of a new vitality and just arrangement for all. Already, in some European countries, in France, in Prussia, one traces some beginnings of an arrangement for the Literary Class; indicating the gradual possibility of such. I believe that it is possible; that it will have to be possible.
The outcome for individual writers isn’t very significant; they are just individuals, a tiny part of the larger whole. They can keep going and either thrive or fail, just as they always have. But it really matters to society as a whole whether it chooses to elevate its knowledge and wisdom or trample it underfoot, wasting it in reckless ways (not without destruction), as has happened before! Knowledge is what the world truly needs. If the world gains wisdom, it will successfully tackle its challenges and become the best version it can be. I see the disorganized state of the Literary Class as the root of all other issues, both a consequence and a cause; finding a good solution for this could spark a new energy and proper order for everything else. Already, in some European countries, like France and Prussia, we can see the beginnings of a structure for supporting the Literary Class, showing that this is gradually becoming a reality. I believe it’s possible; it must be made possible.
By far the most interesting fact I hear about the 397Chinese is one on which we cannot arrive at clearness, but which excites endless curiosity even in the dim state: this namely, that they do attempt to make their Men of Letters their Governors! It would be rash to say, one understood how this was done, or with what degree of success it was done. All such things must be very unsuccessful; yet a small degree of success is precious; the very attempt how precious! There does seem to be, all over China, a more or less active search everywhere to discover the men of talent that grow up in the young generation. Schools there are for every one: a foolish sort of training, yet still a sort. The youths who distinguish themselves in the lower school are promoted into favourable stations in the higher, that they may still more distinguish themselves,—forward and forward: it appears to be out of these that the Official Persons, and incipient Governors, are taken. These are they whom they try first, whether they can govern or not. And surely with the best hope: for they are the men that have already shown intellect. Try them: they have not governed or administered as yet; perhaps they cannot; but there is no doubt they have some Understanding, without which no man can! Neither is Understanding a tool, as we are too apt to figure; ‘it is a hand which can handle any tool.’ Try these men: they are of all others the best worth trying.—Surely there is no kind of government, constitution, revolution, social apparatus or arrangement, that I know of in this world, so promising to one’s scientific curiosity as this. The man of intellect at the top of affairs: this is the aim of all constitutions and revolutions, if they have any aim. For the man of true intellect, as I assert and believe always, is the noblehearted man withal, the true, just, humane and valiant man. Get him for governor, all is got; fail to get him, though you had Constitutions plentiful as blackberries, and a Parliament in every village, there is nothing yet got!—
By far the most interesting thing I hear about the 397Chinese is something we're not clear on, but it sparks endless curiosity even in this vague state: namely, that they try to make their intellectuals their leaders! It would be rash to say we truly understand how this is done, or how successful it is. All such attempts must be quite unsuccessful; still, even a little success is valuable; the very effort is valuable! There seems to be a general search throughout China to identify talented individuals in the younger generation. Schools exist for everyone: it's a somewhat useless form of training, yet still a form. The students who excel in lower schools are promoted to better positions in higher schools, so they can excel even more—moving forward and forward: it seems these are the ones from whom the officials and future leaders are selected. These are the individuals they test first, to see if they can lead or not. And surely there's hope: because they are the individuals who have already demonstrated intelligence. Test them: they have not governed or managed anything yet; perhaps they can’t; but there’s no doubt they do possess some understanding, without which no one can lead! Understanding isn’t a tool, as we often picture it; it’s a hand that can use any tool. Test these individuals: they are the best candidates to evaluate. Surely there is no type of government, constitution, revolution, or social structure that I know of in this world that's more promising for scientific curiosity than this. The idea of having an intellectual in charge of affairs: this is the goal of all constitutions and revolutions, if they have any purpose. Because the truly intelligent person, as I always assert and believe, is the noble-hearted person, the true, just, humane, and courageous individual. Get him as governor, and you’ve achieved everything; fail to get him, even if you had constitutions as plentiful as blackberries and a parliament in every village, you have accomplished nothing!—
These things look strange, truly; and are not such as we commonly speculate upon. But we are fallen into strange times; these things will require to be speculated upon; to be rendered practicable, to be in some way put in practice. These and many others. On 398all hands of us, there is the announcement, audible enough, that the old Empire of Routine has ended; that to say a thing has long been, is no reason for its continuing to be. The things which have been are fallen into decay, are fallen into incompetence; large masses of mankind, in every society of our Europe, are no longer capable of living at all by the things which have been. When millions of men can no longer by their utmost exertion gain food for themselves, and ‘the third man for thirty-six weeks each year is short of third-rate potatoes,’ the things which have been must decidedly prepare to alter themselves!—I will now quit this of the organisation of Men of Letters.
These things seem odd, for sure; and they're not what we usually think about. But we’re in strange times; these things will need to be considered; they need to be made practical and somehow put into action. These and many others. On 398 all of us can clearly hear the announcement that the old Empire of Routine has ended; that just because something has been true for a long time doesn’t mean it will continue to be. The things that have existed are now decaying, are now ineffective; large groups of people in every society across Europe can no longer sustain themselves by the things that have been. When millions can no longer even manage to feed themselves with their best efforts, and ‘the third man is short of third-rate potatoes for thirty-six weeks each year,’ then the things that have been definitely need to change!—I will now move on from this discussion about the organization of Writers.
Alas, the evil that pressed heaviest on those Literary Heroes of ours was not the want of organisation for Men of Letters, but a far deeper one; out of which, indeed, this and so many other evils for the Literary Man, and for all men, had, as from their fountain, taken rise. That our Hero as Man of Letters had to travel without highway, companionless, through an inorganic chaos,—and to leave his own life and faculty lying there, as a partial contribution towards pushing some highway through it: this, had not his faculty itself been so perverted and paralysed, he might have put up with, might have considered to be but the common lot of Heroes. His fatal misery was the spiritual paralysis, so we may name it, of the Age in which his life lay; whereby his life too, do what he might, was half-paralysed! The Eighteenth was a Sceptical Century; in which little word there is a whole Pandora’s Box of miseries. Scepticism means not intellectual Doubt alone, but moral Doubt; all sorts of infidelity, insincerity, spiritual paralysis. Perhaps, in few centuries that one could specify since the world began, was a life of Heroism more difficult for a man. That was not an age of Faith,—an age of Heroes! The very possibility of Heroism had been, as it were, formally abnegated in the minds of all. Heroism was gone forever; Triviality, Formulism and Commonplace were come forever. The ‘age of miracles’ had been, or perhaps had not been; but it was not any longer. An effete 399world; wherein Wonder, Greatness, Godhood could not now dwell;—in one word, a godless world!
Unfortunately, the biggest challenge faced by our Literary Heroes wasn’t just the lack of organization among writers, but something much deeper; from which many other problems for the Literary Man, and for everyone, originated. That our Hero, as a writer, had to navigate a chaotic, disorganized landscape all alone, leaving behind part of his life and talent as a small contribution to create a path through it: if his abilities hadn’t been twisted and stifled, he might have accepted this as just the common fate of Heroes. His ultimate despair was the spiritual paralysis of his time; no matter how hard he tried, his life too was half-paralyzed! The Eighteenth Century was a Sceptical Century; that little word holds a whole box of troubles. Scepticism doesn’t just mean intellectual doubt, but moral doubt; all kinds of infidelity, insincerity, and spiritual paralysis. Perhaps, in only a few centuries since the world began, was it harder for a man to live a life of Heroism. It wasn’t a time of Faith—an age of Heroes! The very idea of Heroism had essentially been rejected by everyone. Heroism was gone forever; triviality, formulaic thinking, and the commonplace had taken over for good. The ‘age of miracles’ had been, or maybe had never existed; but it certainly was no longer. An exhausted world; where Wonder, Greatness, Divinity could no longer exist;—in short, a godless world!
How mean, dwarfish are their ways of thinking, in this time,—compared not with the Christian Shakspeares and Miltons, but with the old Pagan Skalds, with any species of believing men! The living Tree Igdrasil, with the melodious prophetic waving of its world-wide boughs, deep-rooted as Hela, has died-out into the clanking of a World-Machine. ‘Tree’ and ‘Machine’: contrast these two things. I, for my share, declare the world to be no machine! I say that it does not go by wheel-and-pinion ‘motives,’ self-interests, checks, balances; that there is something far other in it than the clank of spinning-jennies, and parliamentary majorities; and, on the whole, that it is not a machine at all!—The old Norse Heathen had a truer notion of God’s-world than these poor Machine-Sceptics: the old Heathen Norse were sincere men. But for these poor Sceptics there was no sincerity, no truth. Half-truth and hearsay was called truth. Truth, for most men, meant plausibility; to be measured by the number of votes you could get. They had lost any notion that sincerity was possible, or of what sincerity was. How many Plausibilities asking, with unaffected surprise and the air of offended virtue, What! am not I sincere? Spiritual Paralysis, I say, nothing left but a Mechanical life, was the characteristic of that century. For the common man, unless happily he stood below his century and belonged to another prior one, it was impossible to be a Believer, a Hero; he lay buried, unconscious, under these baleful influences. To the strongest man, only with infinite struggle and confusion was it possible to work himself half-loose; and lead as it were, in an enchanted, most tragical way, a spiritual death-in-life, and be a Half-Hero!
How petty and small-minded are their ways of thinking today—compared not to the Christian Shakespeares and Miltons, but to the old Pagan Skalds, or any group of genuinely believing people! The living Tree Igdrasil, with its beautiful, prophetic swaying boughs that stretch across the world, deep-rooted as Hela, has turned into the clanking of a World-Machine. ‘Tree’ and ‘Machine’: let's contrast these two concepts. For my part, I assert that the world is not a machine! I argue that it doesn't operate on wheel-and-pinion ‘motives,’ self-interests, checks, and balances; that there’s something far deeper than the clanging of spinning jennies and parliamentary majorities; and overall, that it is not a machine at all! The old Norse Heathens had a truer understanding of God’s world than these poor Machine Sceptics: the old Heathen Norse were sincere individuals. But for these poor Sceptics, there was no sincerity and no truth. Half-truths and hearsay were considered truth. For most people, truth meant what seemed plausible; it was measured by the number of votes one could gather. They had lost any sense that sincerity was possible, or even what sincerity truly was. How many Plausibilities asked, with genuine surprise and a sense of offended virtue, “What! Am I not sincere?” Spiritual Paralysis, I declare, left nothing but a mechanical existence; that was the hallmark of that century. For the average person, unless by chance he stood below his time and belonged to an earlier era, it was impossible to be a Believer, a Hero; he lay buried, unconscious, under these harmful influences. For even the strongest person, only through immense struggle and confusion could it be possible to break free, leading what felt like a tragic, enchanted existence, a spiritual death-in-life, and emerge as a Half-Hero!
Scepticism is the name we give to all this; as the chief symptom, as the chief origin of all this. Concerning which so much were to be said! It would take many Discourses, not a small fraction of one Discourse, to state what one feels about that Eighteenth Century and its ways. As indeed this, and the like of this, which we now call Scepticism, is precisely the black 400malady and life-foe, against which all teaching and discoursing since man’s life began has directed itself: the battle of Belief against Unbelief is the never-ending battle! Neither is it in the way of crimination that one would wish to speak. Scepticism, for that century, we must consider as the decay of old ways of believing, the preparation afar off for new better and wider ways,—an inevitable thing. We will not blame men for it; we will lament their hard fate. We will understand that destruction of old forms is not destruction of everlasting substances; that Scepticism, as sorrowful and hateful as we see it, is not an end but a beginning.
Skepticism is what we call all this; it's the main symptom, the main cause of everything. There's so much to say about it! It would take many discussions, not just a small part of one, to express what we feel about the Eighteenth Century and its attitudes. This thing we now refer to as Skepticism is truly the dark plague and life enemy, against which all teaching and discussion since the dawn of humanity has fought: the struggle of Belief against Unbelief is a never-ending battle! We don't want to speak in a blaming way. Skepticism, for that century, should be seen as the decline of old beliefs, the distant preparation for new, better, and broader beliefs—something that was bound to happen. We won’t blame people for it; we’ll mourn their difficult situation. We’ll recognize that the destruction of old forms doesn’t mean the destruction of eternal substances; that Skepticism, as sad and detestable as it seems, is not an end but a beginning.
The other day speaking, without prior purpose that way, of Bentham’s theory of man and man’s life, I chanced to call it a more beggarly one than Mahomet’s. I am bound to say, now when it is once uttered, that such is my deliberate opinion. Not that one would mean offence against the man Jeremy Bentham, or those who respect and believe him. Bentham himself, and even the creed of Bentham, seems to me comparatively worthy of praise. It is a determinate being what all the world, in a cowardly, half-and-half manner, was tending to be. Let us have the crisis; we shall either have death or the cure. I call this gross, steam-engine Utilitarianism an approach towards new Faith. It was a laying down of cant; a saying to oneself: “Well then, this world is a dead iron machine, the god of it Gravitation and selfish Hunger; let us see what, by checking and balancing, and good adjustment of tooth and pinion, can be made of it!” Benthamism has something complete, manful, in such fearless committal of itself to what it finds true; you may call it Heroic, though a Heroism with its eyes put out! It is the culminating point, and fearless ultimatum, of what lay in the half-and-half state, pervading man’s whole existence in that Eighteenth Century. It seems to me, all deniers of Godhood, and all lip-believers of it, are bound to be Benthamites, if they have courage and honesty. Benthamism is an eyeless Heroism: the Human Species, like a hapless blinded Samson grinding in the Philistine Mill, clasps convulsively the pillars of its Mill; brings huge ruin down, but ultimately 401deliverance withal. Of Bentham I meant to say no harm.
The other day, while talking without any particular aim about Bentham’s theory of man and life, I happened to call it a poorer theory than Muhammad’s. I must say, now that I’ve said it, that this is my honest opinion. This isn’t meant to offend Jeremy Bentham or those who admire and believe in him. Bentham himself, and even his philosophy, seem comparatively deserving of praise to me. It represents a determined being that everyone else, in a cowardly, half-hearted way, was aiming to become. Let’s face the crisis; we will either face death or find a solution. I consider this crude, steam-powered Utilitarianism a step towards a new Faith. It was a rejection of pretense; a way of saying to oneself: “Alright then, this world is a lifeless iron machine, ruled by Gravity and selfish Hunger; let’s see what we can create by adjusting and balancing its components!” Benthamism has something complete and courageous in its fearless commitment to what it recognizes as true; you might call it Heroic, though it’s a Heroism that is blind! It epitomizes the bold culmination and ultimate declaration of what existed in the indecisive state that permeated human existence in the Eighteenth Century. It seems to me that all who deny God and all who merely profess belief in Him are bound to adopt Benthamism, if they have the courage and integrity. Benthamism is an eyeless Heroism: the Human Species, like a blind Samson trapped in a Philistine Mill, desperately clings to the pillars of its Mill; it brings down great destruction, but ultimately 401achieves liberation as well. I meant no harm in speaking of Bentham.
But this I do say, and would wish all men to know and lay to heart, that he who discerns nothing but Mechanism in the Universe has in the fatalest way missed the secret of the Universe altogether. That all Godhood should vanish out of men’s conception of this Universe seems to me precisely the most brutal error,—I will not disparage Heathenism by calling it a Heathen error,—that men could fall into. It is not true; it is false at the very heart of it. A man who thinks so will think wrong about all things in the world; this original sin will vitiate all other conclusions he can form. One might call it the most lamentable of delusions,—not forgetting Witchcraft itself! Witchcraft worshipped at least a living Devil: but this worships a dead iron Devil; no God, not even a Devil!—Whatsoever is noble, divine, inspired, drops thereby out of life. There remains everywhere in life a despicable caput-mortuum; the mechanical hull, all soul fled out of it. How can a man act heroically? The ‘Doctrine of Motives’ will teach him that it is, under more or less disguise, nothing but a wretched love of Pleasure, fear of Pain; that Hunger, of applause, of cash, of whatsoever victual it may be, is the ultimate fact of man’s life. Atheism, in brief;—which does indeed frightfully punish itself. The man, I say, is become spiritually a paralytic man; this god-like Universe a dead mechanical steam-engine, all working by motives, checks, balances, and I know not what; wherein, as in the detestable belly of some Phalaris’-Bull of his own contriving, he the poor Phalaris sits miserably dying!
But I want to say this, and I hope everyone understands and remembers it: those who see only Mechanism in the Universe have tragically missed the essence of it entirely. The idea that all notions of God should disappear from people's understanding of this Universe strikes me as the most brutal error—one I wouldn't even categorize as a Heathen mistake. It's simply not true; it's fundamentally false. A person who thinks this way will be mistaken about everything in the world; this original sin will taint every other conclusion they reach. One might call it the most unfortunate of delusions—not to mention Witchcraft itself! At least Witchcraft worshipped a living Devil, but this mindset worships a dead, iron Devil—no God, not even a Devil! Everything noble, divine, and inspired gets stripped away from life. What remains is a contemptible caput-mortuum; a mechanical shell, completely devoid of soul. How can a person act heroically? The ‘Doctrine of Motives’ will teach him that it's, with varying degrees of disguise, merely a miserable pursuit of Pleasure and an avoidance of Pain; that the desire for approval, money, or any kind of sustenance is the ultimate reality of human life. In short, atheism—which severely punishes itself. This person has become spiritually paralyzed; this god-like Universe now resembles a dead mechanical steam engine, functioning solely on motives, checks, balances, and I can't even say what else; where, like the wretched Phalaris, he sits miserably dying in the abhorrent belly of his own contraption!
Belief I define to be the healthy act of a man’s mind. It is a mysterious indescribable process, that of getting to believe;—indescribable, as all vital acts are. We have our mind given us, not that it may cavil and argue, but that it may see into something, give us clear belief and understanding about something, whereon we are then to proceed to act. Doubt, truly, is not itself a crime. Certainly we do not rush out, clutch-up the first thing we find, and straightway believe that! All manner of doubt, inquiry, σκέψις as it is named, about 402all manner of objects, dwells in every reasonable mind. It is the mystic working of the mind, on the object it is getting to know and believe. Belief comes out of all this, above ground, like the tree from its hidden roots. But now if, even on common things, we require that a man keep his doubts silent, and not babble of them till they in some measure become affirmations or denials; how much more in regard to the highest things, impossible to speak of in words at all! That a man parade his doubt, and get to imagine that debating and logic (which means at best only the manner of telling us your thought, your belief or disbelief, about a thing) is the triumph and true work of what intellect he has: alas, this is as if you should overturn the tree, and instead of green boughs, leaves, and fruits, show us ugly taloned roots turned-up into the air,—and no growth, only death and misery going on!
Belief is what I see as a healthy function of the mind. It's a mysterious, indescribable process of coming to believe—indescribable, like all vital actions. Our minds are given to us not to bicker and argue, but to perceive something, giving us clear belief and understanding about it, so we can then take action. Doubt, in itself, isn’t a crime. We certainly don't rush out, grab the first thing we see, and believe in it right away! All kinds of doubt, inquiry, thought as it’s called, exists in every reasonable mind regarding various subjects. It's the mind's mystical engagement with the object it’s coming to know and believe. Belief emerges from this, just like a tree grows from its hidden roots. But now, if we expect a person to keep their doubts silent about common things, and not speak of them until they somewhat turn into affirmations or denials, how much more so regarding the highest matters, which are impossible to express in words at all! For someone to flaunt their doubt and think that debating and logic (which is really just a way of expressing your thoughts, beliefs, or disbeliefs about something) is the ultimate achievement of their intellect: alas, that’s like overturning the tree and instead of showing us green branches, leaves, and fruits, revealing ugly, claw-like roots exposed to the air—with no growth, only death and despair happening!
For the Scepticism, as I said, is not intellectual only; It is moral also; a chronic atrophy and disease of the whole soul. A man lives by believing something; not by debating and arguing about many things. A sad case for him when all that he can manage to believe is something he can button in his pocket, and with one or the other organ eat and digest! Lower than that he will not get. We call those ages in which he gets so low the mournfulest, sickest, and meanest of all ages. The world’s heart is palsied, sick: how can any limb of it be whole? Genuine Acting ceases in all departments of the world’s work; dextrous Similitude of Acting begins. The world’s wages are pocketed, the world’s work is not done. Heroes have gone out; quacks have come in. Accordingly, what Century, since the end of the Roman world, which also was a time of scepticism, simulacra and universal decadence, so abounds with Quacks as that Eighteenth! Consider them, with their tumid sentimental vapouring about virtue, benevolence,—the wretched Quack-squadron, Cagliostro at the head of them! Few men were without quackery; they had got to consider it a necessary ingredient and amalgam for truth. Chatham, our brave Chatham himself, comes down to the House, all wrapt and bandaged; he ‘has crawled out in great bodily 403suffering,’ and so on;—forgets, says Walpole, that he is acting the sick man; in the fire of debate, snatches his arm from the sling, and oratorically swings and brandishes it! Chatham himself lives the strangest mimetic life, half hero, half quack, all along. For indeed the world is full of dupes; and you have to gain the world’s suffrage! How the duties of the world will be done in that case, what quantities of error, which means failure, which means sorrow and misery, to some and to many, will gradually accumulate in all provinces of the world’s business, we need not compute.
For Scepticism, as I mentioned, is not just intellectual; it’s also moral; it’s a continuous weakening and illness of the entire soul. A person lives by believing in something; they don't thrive by endlessly debating and arguing about various things. It’s a tragic situation when all they can bring themselves to believe is something they can carry in their pocket and eat and digest with one body part or another! They won't sink any lower than that. We refer to the times when they sink so low as the saddest, sickliest, and meanest ages. The world's heart is paralyzed and sick: how can any part of it be whole? Genuine Acting stops in all areas of the world’s work; clever Imitation of Acting begins. The world’s earnings are taken, yet the world’s work is left undone. Heroes have disappeared; frauds have taken their place. So, which Century, since the fall of the Roman world, which was also marked by skepticism, imitation, and widespread decline, has more frauds than the Eighteenth? Just look at them, with their inflated sentimental talk about virtue and kindness—the miserable Quack squad, led by Cagliostro! Few men were free from quackery; they came to treat it as a necessary mix with truth. Chatham, our brave Chatham himself, shows up in the House, all wrapped up and bandaged; he 'has crawled out in great bodily suffering,' and so on;—forgets, says Walpole, that he’s pretending to be sick; in the heat of debate, he pulls his arm from the sling and passionately waves it around! Chatham himself lives the most peculiar imitative life, part hero, part quack, all along. Because the world is filled with fools; and you have to win the world’s approval! As for how the world’s responsibilities will be handled in that situation, how much error, which signifies failure, which means pain and misery for some and many, will gradually accumulate in every area of the world’s work, we don’t need to calculate.
It seems to me, you lay your finger here on the heart of the world’s maladies, when you call it a Sceptical World. An insincere world; a godless untruth of a world! It is out of this, as I consider, that the whole tribe of social pestilences, French Revolutions, Chartisms, and what not, have derived their being, their chief necessity to be. This must alter. Till this alter, nothing can beneficially alter. My one hope of the world, my inexpugnable consolation in looking at the miseries of the world, is that this is altering. Here and there one does now find a man who knows, as of old, that this world is a Truth, and no Plausibility and Falsity; that he himself is alive, not dead or paralytic; and that the world is alive, instinct with Godhood, beautiful and awful, even as in the beginning of days! One man once knowing this, many men, all men, must by and by come to know it. It lies there clear, for whosoever will take the spectacles off his eyes and honestly look, to know! For such a man, the Unbelieving Century, with its unblessed Products, is already past: a new century is already come. The old unblessed Products and Performances, as solid as they look, are Phantasms, preparing speedily to vanish. To this and the other noisy, very great-looking Simulacrum with the whole world huzzahing at its heels, he can say, composedly stepping aside: Thou art not true; thou art not extant, only semblant; go thy way!—Yes, hollow Formulism, gross Benthamism, and other unheroic atheistic Insincerity is visibly and even rapidly declining. An unbelieving Eighteenth Century is but an exception,—such as now and then occurs. I prophesy 404that the world will once more become sincere; a believing world: with many Heroes in it, a heroic world! It will then be a victorious world; never till then!
It seems to me that you're touching on the core of the world's problems when you refer to it as a Sceptical World. It's an insincere world, a godless, deceitful world! From this, I believe, has come a whole array of social issues, like the French Revolutions, Chartisms, and so on. This has to change. Until this changes, nothing can positively change. My only hope for the world, my unbreakable comfort in looking at the world's suffering, is that this is changing. Here and there, you can find a person who understands, as in the past, that this world is a Truth, not just a Plausibility or a Falsehood; that he is alive, not dead or lifeless; and that the world is alive, full of the essence of Divinity, beautiful and terrifying, just like in the beginning! Once one person knows this, many people, all people, will eventually come to know it. It's clear and available for anyone willing to take off their glasses and look honestly! For such a person, the Unbelieving Century, along with its unworthy creations, is already over: a new century has begun. The old unworthy creations and acts, no matter how solid they seem, are illusions, soon to disappear. To this noisy, impressive Simulacrum, with the whole world cheering it on, he can calmly say as he steps aside: You are not true; you do not truly exist, just a semblance; go away!—Yes, hollow Formalism, crude Benthamism, and other unheroic atheistic Insincerity are clearly and even quickly fading. An unbelieving Eighteenth Century is just an exception, like one that occasionally happens. I prophesy that the world will once again become sincere; a believing world: with many Heroes in it, a heroic world! It will then be a victorious world; not until then!
Or indeed what of the world and its victories? Men speak too much about the world. Each one of us here, let the world go how it will, and be victorious or not victorious, has he not a Life of his own to lead? One Life; a little gleam of Time between two Eternities; no second chance to us forevermore! It were well for us to live not as fools and simulacra, but as wise and realities. The world’s being saved will not save us; nor the world’s being lost destroy us. We should look to ourselves: there is great merit here in the ‘duty of staying at home’! And, on the whole, to say truth, I never heard of ‘worlds’ being ‘saved’ in any other way. That mania of saving worlds is itself a piece of the Eighteenth Century with its windy sentimentalism. Let us not follow it too far. For the saving of the world I will trust confidently to the Maker of the world; and look a little to my own saving, which I am more competent to!—In brief, for the world’s sake, and for our own, we will rejoice greatly that Scepticism, Insincerity, Mechanical Atheism, with all their poison-dews, are going, and as good as gone.—
Or really, what about the world and its victories? People talk too much about the world. Each of us here, whether the world thrives or fails, doesn’t he have a life of his own to live? One life; a brief moment in time between two eternities; no second chances for us ever! It would be wise for us to live not as fools and imitations, but as wise individuals and realities. The world being saved won’t save us; nor will the world being lost destroy us. We should focus on ourselves: there’s great value in the 'duty of staying at home'! Honestly, I’ve never heard of 'worlds' being 'saved' in any other way. That obsession with saving worlds is really a remnant of the Eighteenth Century with its empty sentimentalism. Let’s not get carried away with it. For the saving of the world, I will confidently leave that to the Creator of the world; and focus a bit more on my own salvation, which I can handle better!—In short, for the sake of the world, and for our own, we will be glad that Scepticism, Insincerity, Mechanical Atheism, with all their harmful effects, are fading away, and almost gone.—
Now it was under such conditions, in those times of Johnson, that our Men of Letters had to live. Times in which there was properly no truth in life. Old truths had fallen nigh dumb; the new lay yet hidden, not trying to speak. That Man’s Life here below was a Sincerity and Fact, and would forever continue such, no new intimation, in that dusk of the world, had yet dawned. No intimation; not even any French Revolution,—which we define to be a Truth once more, though a Truth clad in hellfire! How different was the Luther’s Pilgrimage, with its assured goal, from the Johnson’s, girt with mere traditions, suppositions, grown now incredible, unintelligible! Mahomet’s Formulas were of ‘wood waxed and oiled,’ and could be burnt out of one’s way: poor Johnson’s were far more difficult to burn.—The strong man will ever find work, which means difficulty, pain, to the full measure of his strength. But to make-out a victory, in those circumstances of 405our poor Hero as Man of Letters, was perhaps more difficult than in any. Not obstruction, disorganisation, Bookseller Osborne and Fourpence-halfpenny a day; not this alone; but the light of his own soul was taken from him. No landmark on the Earth; and, alas, what is that to having no loadstar in the Heaven! We need not wonder that none of those Three men rose to victory. That they fought truly is the highest praise. With a mournful sympathy we will contemplate, if not three living victorious Heroes, as I said, the Tombs of three fallen Heroes! They fell for us too; making a way for us. There are the mountains which they hurled abroad in their confused War of the Giants; under which, their strength and life spent, they now lie buried.
Now, it was under these conditions, during the Johnson era, that our writers had to live. Times where there was hardly any truth in life. Old truths had nearly fallen silent; the new ones were still hidden, not even attempting to express themselves. The idea that human life here on Earth was straightforward and real, and would always remain so, had not yet seen any new signs, in that dark time. No indications; not even the French Revolution—which we define as a truth once again, though a truth wrapped in chaos! How different Luther's Pilgrimage was, with its clear destination, from Johnson's, surrounded by mere traditions and assumptions that had now become unbelievable and incomprehensible! Muhammad’s teachings were like 'wood that’s been polished and varnished,' easily removed; but poor Johnson's ideas were far harder to eliminate. The strong man will always find work, meaning challenges and pain, that fully tests his strength. Yet to achieve victory in those circumstances for our poor hero as a writer was perhaps more challenging than ever. It wasn't just the obstacles, disorganization, Bookseller Osborne, and a meager Fourpence-halfpenny a day; it was that the light of his own spirit had been taken from him. No markers on Earth; and, unfortunately, imagine having no guiding star in the heavens! We shouldn’t be surprised that none of those three men achieved victory. That they fought earnestly is the highest praise. With a compassionate sorrow, we’ll remember, if not three living victorious heroes, then the tombs of three fallen heroes! They fell for us too, paving the way for us. There are the mountains they cast out in their chaotic battles; under which, having spent their strength and lives, they now lie buried.
I have already written of these three Literary Heroes, expressly or incidentally; what I suppose is known to most of you; what need not be spoken or written a second time. They concern us here as the singular Prophets of that singular age; for such they virtually were; and the aspect they and their world exhibit, under this point of view, might lead us into reflections enough! I call them, all three, Genuine Men more or less; faithfully, for most part unconsciously, struggling to be genuine, and plant themselves on the everlasting truth of things. This to a degree that eminently distinguishes them from the poor artificial mass of their contemporaries; and renders them worthy to be considered as Speakers, in some measure, of the everlasting truth, as Prophets in that age of theirs. By Nature herself, a noble necessity was laid on them to be so. They were men of such magnitude that they could not live on unrealities,—clouds, froth and all inanity gave-way under them: there was no footing for them but on firm earth; no rest or regular motion for them, if they got not footing there. To a certain extent, they were Sons of Nature once more in an age of Artifice; once more, Original Men.
I have already talked about these three Literary Heroes, either directly or indirectly; what I believe most of you know; what doesn’t need to be repeated. They are important to us here as the unique Prophets of that special time; because that’s essentially what they were; and the way they and their world appear, from this angle, could lead us to many reflections! I refer to them, all three, as Genuine Men more or less; faithfully, and mostly without realizing it, working to be authentic, and grounding themselves in the everlasting truth of things. This sets them apart from the poor, artificial crowd of their contemporaries; and makes them worthy of being seen as Speakers, in some way, of that enduring truth, as Prophets of their time. By Nature herself, a noble necessity was placed upon them to be so. They were men of such stature that they couldn’t survive on pretenses—clouds, froth, and all nonsense fell away beneath them: there was no ground for them except solid earth; no rest or real progress for them unless they found their footing there. To some degree, they were Sons of Nature once more in an age of Artifice; once again, Original Men.
As for Johnson, I have always considered him to be, by nature, one of our great English souls. A strong and noble man; so much left undeveloped in him to the last: in a kindlier element what might he not have been,—Poet, 406Priest, sovereign Ruler! On the whole, a man must not complain of his ‘element,’ of his ‘time,’ or the like; it is thriftless work doing so. His time is bad: well then, he is there to make it better!—Johnson’s youth was poor, isolated, hopeless, very miserable. Indeed, it does not seem possible that, in any the favourablest outward circumstances, Johnson’s life could have been other than a painful one. The world might have had more of profitable work out of him, or less; but his effort against the world’s work could never have been a light one. Nature, in return for his nobleness, had said to him, Live in an element of diseased sorrow. Nay, perhaps the sorrow and the nobleness were intimately and even inseparably connected with each other. At all events, poor Johnson had to go about girt with continual hypochondria, physical and spiritual pain. Like a Hercules with the burning Nessus’-shirt on him, which shoots-in on him dull incurable misery: the Nessus’-shirt not to be stript-off, which is his own natural skin! In this manner he had to live. Figure him there, with his scrofulous diseases, with his great greedy heart, and unspeakable chaos of thoughts; stalking mournful as a stranger in this Earth; eagerly devouring what spiritual thing he could come at: school-languages and other merely grammatical stuff, if there were nothing better! The largest soul that was in all England; and provision made for it of ‘fourpence-halfpenny a day.’ Yet a giant invincible soul; a true man’s. One remembers always that story of the shoes at Oxford: the rough, seamy-faced, rawboned College Servitor stalking about, in winter-season, with his shoes worn-out; how the charitable Gentleman Commoner secretly places a new pair at his door; and the rawboned Servitor, lifting them, looking at them near, with his dim eyes, with what thoughts,—pitches them out of window! Wet feet, mud, frost, hunger or what you will; but not beggary: we cannot stand beggary! Rude stubborn self-help here; a whole world of squalor, rudeness, confused misery and want, yet of nobleness and manfulness withal. It is a type of the man’s life, this pitching-away of the shoes. An original man;—not a secondhand, borrowing or begging man. Let us 407stand on our own basis, at any rate! On such shoes as we ourselves can get. On frost and mud, if you will, but honestly on that;—on the reality and substance which Nature gives us, not on the semblance, on the thing she has given another than us!—
As for Johnson, I've always viewed him as one of our great English spirits. A strong and noble man; so much potential remained unexplored in him until the end: in a more nurturing environment, he could have been a Poet, 406Priest, or a sovereign Ruler! Overall, a person shouldn't complain about their ‘situation,’ their ‘time,’ or anything like that; it’s a waste of energy. His time is tough: well then, he’s there to make it better!—Johnson’s youth was poor, lonely, hopeless, and very miserable. In fact, it seems unlikely that, even with the best external circumstances, Johnson’s life could have been anything other than painful. The world might have benefited more or less from his work, but his struggle against the world's challenges could never have been easy. Nature, in exchange for his nobility, told him, Live in an environment of deep sorrow. Perhaps the sorrow and nobility were deeply and inseparably linked. In any case, poor Johnson had to live bound by constant hypochondria, physical and emotional pain. Like Hercules wearing the burning shirt of Nessus, which inflicted upon him dull, incurable misery: the Nessus’ shirt that couldn't be stripped off, which was his own natural skin! This is how he had to exist. Picture him there, struggling with his scrofulous illnesses, with his big, eager heart, and chaotic thoughts; moving about sorrowfully like a stranger in this world; eagerly consuming whatever spiritual nourishment he could find: school languages and other strictly grammatical stuff, if nothing better was available! The largest soul in all of England, yet living on ‘fourpence-halfpenny a day.’ And still, an indomitable soul; a true man’s. One always recalls the story of the shoes at Oxford: the rough, worn-faced, rawboned college servant walking around in winter with his shoes completely worn out; how a kind Gentleman Commoner secretly leaves a new pair at his door; and the rawboned servant, upon picking them up, examining them closely with his dim eyes, with what thoughts—throws them out of the window! Wet feet, mud, frost, hunger, or whatever else; but not beggary: we cannot accept beggary! Here's a stubborn self-reliance; a whole realm of squalor, rudeness, confusion, and hardship, yet infused with nobility and manliness. This act of discarding the shoes symbolizes his life. An original man— not someone who borrows or begs. Let's 407stand on our own foundation, at least! With whatever shoes we can manage. On frost and mud, if you must, but honestly on that;—on the reality and substance provided by Nature us, not on the façade, on what she has given to someone else!
And yet with all this rugged pride of manhood and self-help was there ever soul more tenderly affectionate, loyally submissive to what was really higher than he? Great souls are always loyally submissive, reverent to what is over them; only small mean souls are otherwise. I could not find a better proof of what I said the other day, That the sincere man was by nature the obedient man; that only in a World of Heroes was there loyal Obedience to the Heroic. The essence of originality is not that it be new: Johnson believed altogether in the old; he found the old opinions credible for him, fit for him; and in a right heroic manner lived under them. He is well worth study in regard to that. For we are to say that Johnson was far other than a mere man of words and formulas; he was a man of truths and facts. He stood by the old formulas; the happier was it for him that he could so stand: but in all formulas that he could stand by, there needed to be a most genuine substance. Very curious how, in that poor Paper-age, so barren, artificial, thick-quilted with Pedantries, Hearsays, the great Fact of this Universe glared in, forever wonderful, indubitable, unspeakable, divine-infernal, upon this man too! How he harmonised his Formulas with it, how he managed at all under such circumstances: that is a thing worth seeing. A thing ‘to be looked at with reverence, with pity, with awe.’ That Church of St. Clement Danes, where Johnson still worshipped in the era of Voltaire, is to me a venerable place.
And yet, despite all this strong pride of manhood and self-reliance, was there ever a soul more tenderly affectionate or more loyally submissive to something truly greater than himself? Great souls are always loyally submissive and respectful to what is above them; only small-minded souls are not. I couldn't find a better proof of what I said the other day, that the sincere person is naturally the obedient person; that only in a World of Heroes is there loyal obedience to the Heroic. The essence of originality isn't that it has to be new: Johnson completely believed in the old; he found the old opinions credible and suitable for him, and in a truly heroic way, lived by them. He is definitely worth studying in this regard. For we must say that Johnson was much more than just a man of words and formulas; he was a man of truths and facts. He stood by the old formulas; it was fortunate for him that he could do so: but in all the formulas that he could support, there had to be a very genuine substance. It’s fascinating how, in that poor Paper-age, so barren, artificial, and weighed down with pedantry and hearsay, the great Fact of this Universe shone through, forever wonderful, undeniable, indescribable, divine and hellish, upon this man too! How he reconciled his formulas with it, how he managed at all under such circumstances: that is something worth examining. A thing ‘to be looked at with reverence, with pity, with awe.’ That Church of St. Clement Danes, where Johnson still worshipped during the era of Voltaire, is to me a revered place.
It was in virtue of his sincerity, of his speaking still in some sort from the heart of Nature, though in the current artificial dialect, that Johnson was a Prophet. Are not all dialects ‘artificial’? Artificial things are not all false;—nay every true Product of Nature will infallibly shape itself; we may say all artificial things are, at the starting of them, true. What we call ‘Formulas’ are not in their origin bad; they are indispensably good. 408Formula is method, habitude; found wherever man is found. Formulas fashion themselves as Paths do, as beaten Highways, leading towards some sacred or high object, whither many men are bent. Consider it. One man, full of heartfelt earnest impulse, finds-out a way of doing somewhat,—were it of uttering his soul’s reverence for the Highest, were it but of fitly saluting his fellow-man. An inventor was needed to do that, a poet; he has articulated the dim-struggling thought that dwelt in his own and many hearts. This is his way of doing that; these are his footsteps, the beginning of a ‘Path.’ And now see: the second man travels naturally in the footsteps of his foregoer, it is the easiest method. In the footsteps of his foregoer; yet with improvements, with changes where such seem good; at all events with enlargements, the Path ever widening itself as more travel it;—till at last there is a broad Highway whereon the whole world may travel and drive. While there remains a City or Shrine, or any Reality to drive to, at the farther end, the Highway shall be right welcome! When the City is gone, we will forsake the Highway. In this manner all Institutions, Practices, Regulated Things in the world have come into existence, and gone out of existence. Formulas all begin by being full of substance; you may call them the skin, the articulation into shape, into limbs and skin, of a substance that is already there: they had not been there otherwise. Idols, as we said, are not idolatrous till they become doubtful, empty for the worshipper’s heart. Much as we talk against Formulas, I hope no one of us is ignorant withal of the high significance of true Formulas; that they were, and will ever be, the indispensablest furniture of our habitation in this world.——
It was because of his sincerity, his ability to speak somewhat from the heart of Nature, even while using the current artificial language, that Johnson was seen as a Prophet. Aren't all dialects ‘artificial’? Just because something is artificial doesn’t mean it's false; every true product of Nature will inevitably shape itself; we can say that all artificial things are, at their inception, true. The so-called ‘Formulas’ aren’t inherently bad; they are absolutely essential. 408 A formula is method, a habit; it exists wherever humanity exists. Formulas develop like paths, like well-trodden highways, leading toward some sacred or lofty goal that many people pursue. Think about it. One person, driven by genuine passion, discovers a way to express something—whether it's to convey their soul’s reverence for the Highest or simply to greet their fellow human beings properly. An inventor, a poet, was needed to accomplish that; he has articulated the dimly felt thought that lingered in his own and others' hearts. This is his way of expressing it; these are his footsteps, the start of a ‘Path.’ And now notice: the second person naturally follows in the footsteps of the first; it’s the easiest approach. Following in the footsteps of his predecessor, yet with improvements, with changes where they seem appropriate; in any case, with expansions, the Path continually widening as more people travel it—until eventually, it becomes a broad Highway where the whole world can travel and drive. As long as there’s a City, a Shrine, or any destination worth reaching at the other end, the Highway will be most welcome! Once the City is gone, we will abandon the Highway. This is how all Institutions, Practices, and Regulated Things in the world have come into being and faded away. Formulas start off being full of substance; you can think of them as the skin, the structure that gives form to the substance that's already there: they wouldn’t exist otherwise. Idols, as we mentioned, aren't idolatrous until they become questionable, hollow for the worshipper’s heart. No matter how much we criticize Formulas, I hope none of us is unaware of the high significance of true Formulas; they have been, and will always be, the essential furnishings of our existence in this world.——
Mark, too, how little Johnson boasts of his ‘sincerity.’ He has no suspicion of his being particularly sincere,—of his being particularly anything! A hard-struggling, weary-hearted man, or ‘scholar’ as he calls himself, trying hard to get some honest livelihood in the world, not to starve, but to live—without stealing! A noble unconsciousness is in him. He does not ‘engrave Truth on his watch-seal;’ no, but he stands by truth, speaks 409by it, works and lives by it. Thus it ever is. Think of it once more. The man whom Nature has appointed to do great things is, first of all, furnished with that openness to Nature which renders him incapable of being insincere! To his large, open, deep-feeling heart Nature is a Fact: all hearsay is hearsay; the unspeakable greatness of this Mystery of Life, let him acknowledge it or not, nay even though he seem to forget it or deny it, is ever present to him,—fearful and wonderful, on this hand and on that. He has a basis of sincerity; unrecognised, because never questioned or capable of question. Mirabeau, Mahomet, Cromwell, Napoleon: all the Great Men I ever heard-of have this as the primary material of them. Innumerable commonplace men are debating, are talking everywhere their commonplace doctrines, which they have learned by logic, by rote, at secondhand: to that kind of man all this is still nothing. He must have truth; truth which he feels to be true. How shall he stand otherwise? His whole soul, at all moments, in all ways, tells him that there is no standing. He is under the noble necessity of being true. Johnson’s way of thinking about this world is not mine, any more than Mahomet’s was: but I recognise the everlasting element of heart-sincerity in both; and see with pleasure how neither of them remains ineffectual. Neither of them is as chaff sown; in both of them is something which the seed-field will grow.
Mark how little Johnson boasts about his ‘sincerity.’ He doesn't think he’s particularly sincere—he's not particularly anything! He’s a hard-working, weary-hearted man, or ‘scholar’ as he calls himself, trying hard to earn a decent living in the world, not just to survive, but to live—without resorting to theft! There’s a noble innocence about him. He doesn’t ‘engrave Truth on his watch-seal;’ no, but he stands by truth, speaks 409by it, works and lives by it. That’s how it always is. Think about it again. The person whom Nature has chosen to achieve great things is, first and foremost, given a connection to Nature that makes him incapable of being inhim,—fearful and wonderful, on both sides. He has a foundation of sincerity; unrecognized, because it's never questioned or capable of being questioned. Mirabeau, Muhammad, Cromwell, Napoleon: all the Great Men I’ve ever heard of share this as their core quality. Countless ordinary men are debating and discussing their usual ideas, which they’ve learned through logic, by heart, secondhand: for that kind of person, all this still means nothing. He must have the truth; the truth that he feels is true. How can he stand otherwise? His entire soul, at every moment, in every way, tells him that there’s no standing still. He is under the noble necessity of being genuine. Johnson’s views about this world are not mine, just as Muhammad’s weren’t: but I recognize the enduring quality of heartfelt sincerity in both; and I see with pleasure how neither of them remains ineffective. Neither of them is like chaff scattered about; in both of them is something that the seed-field will grow.
Johnson was a Prophet to his people; preached a Gospel to them,—as all like him always do. The highest Gospel he preached we may describe as a kind of Moral Prudence: ‘in a world where much is to be done, and little is to be known,’ see how you will do it! A thing well worth preaching. ‘A world where much is to be done, and little is to be known:’ do not sink yourselves in boundless bottomless abysses of Doubt, of wretched god-forgetting Unbelief;—you were miserable then, powerless, mad: how could you do or work at all? Such Gospel Johnson preached and taught;—coupled, theoretically and practically, with this other great Gospel, ‘Clear your mind of Cant!’ Have no trade with Cant: stand on the cold mud in the frosty 410weather, but let it be in your own real torn shoes: ‘that will be better for you,’ as Mahomet says! I call this, I call these two things joined together, a great Gospel, the greatest perhaps that was possible at that time.
Johnson was a leader for his people; he shared a message with them—just like others like him always do. The most important message he shared can be described as a kind of Moral Prudence: ‘in a world where there’s a lot to do, but little to be understood,’ look at how you will do it! That’s definitely worth sharing. ‘A world where there’s a lot to do, but little to be understood:’ don’t drown yourselves in endless, deep abysses of Doubt, in miserable, god-forgetting Unbelief;—you were miserable then, powerless, insane: how could you do anything at all? This is the message Johnson preached and taught;—theoretically and practically linked with this other important message, ‘Clear your mind of pretenses!’ Don’t engage with pretenses: stand on the cold ground in the frosty 410 weather, but make sure it’s in your own real, worn-out shoes: ‘that will be better for you,’ as Muhammad says! I consider this, I consider these two things joined together, a great message, perhaps the greatest that was possible at that time.
Johnson’s Writings, which once had such currency and celebrity, are now, as it were, disowned by the young generation. It is not wonderful; Johnson’s opinions are fast becoming obsolete: but his style of thinking and of living, we may hope, will never become obsolete. I find in Johnson’s Books the indisputablest traces of a great intellect and great heart:—ever welcome, under what obstructions and perversions soever. They are sincere words, those of his; he means things by them. A wondrous buckram style,—the best he could get to then; a measured grandiloquence, stepping or rather stalking along in a very solemn way, grown obsolete now; sometimes a tumid size of phraseology not in proportion to the contents of it: all this you will put-up with. For the phraseology, tumid or not, has always something within it. So many beautiful styles and books, with nothing in them;—a man is a malefactor to the world who writes such! They are the avoidable kind!—Had Johnson left nothing but his Dictionary, one might have traced there a great intellect, a genuine man. Looking to its clearness of definition, its general solidity, honesty, insight, and successful method, it may be called the best of all Dictionaries. There is in it a kind of architectural nobleness; it stands there like a great solid square-built edifice, finished, symmetrically complete: you judge that a true Builder did it.
Johnson’s writings, which once had a lot of influence and fame, are now almost rejected by the younger generation. It’s not surprising; Johnson’s opinions are quickly becoming outdated. However, we can hope that his way of thinking and living will never go out of style. In Johnson's books, I see clear signs of a great mind and a big heart—always appreciated, no matter the challenges or distortions. His words are sincere; he really means what he says. His style is remarkable, the best he could manage at the time; a measured grandeur that moves in a very serious manner, which feels outdated now; sometimes with inflated size of language that doesn’t match the content: you’ll have to tolerate all that. Because the wording, whether pompous or not, always has something within it. There are so many beautiful styles and books with nothing in them; a person who writes that kind of stuff is a malefactor to the world! Those are the kinds to avoid! If Johnson had left nothing but his Dictionary, you could still see a great intellect and a genuine man in it. Thanks to its clear definitions, overall solidity, honesty, insight, and effective method, it could be called the best of all dictionaries. There’s a kind of architectural nobility in it; it stands as a solid, well-constructed building, finished and symmetrically complete: you can tell a true builder created it.
One word, in spite of our haste, must be granted to poor Bozzy. He passes for a mean, inflated, gluttonous creature; and was so in many senses. Yet the fact of his reverence for Johnson will ever remain noteworthy. The foolish conceited Scotch Laird, the most conceited man of his time, approaching in such awestruck attitude the great dusty irascible Pedagogue in his mean garret there: it is a genuine reverence for Excellence; a worship for Heroes, at a time when neither Heroes nor worship were surmised to exist. Heroes, it would seem 411exist always, and a certain worship of them! We will also take the liberty to deny altogether that of the witty Frenchman, that no man is a Hero to his valet-de-chambre. Or if so, it is not the Hero’s blame, but the Valet’s: that his soul, namely, is a mean valet-soul! He expects his Hero to advance in royal stage-trappings, with measured step, trains borne behind him, trumpets sounding before him. It should stand rather, No man can be a Grand-Monarque to his valet-de-chambre. Strip your Louis Quatorze of his king-gear, and there is left nothing but a poor forked radish with a head fantastically carved;—admirable to no valet. The Valet does not know a Hero when he sees him! Alas, no: it requires a kind of Hero to do that;—and one of the world’s wants, in this as in other senses, is for the most part want of such.
One word, despite our rush, should be given to poor Bozzy. He’s seen as a petty, arrogant, greedy individual; and he certainly has been in many ways. Yet, his respect for Johnson will always be significant. The foolish, self-absorbed Scottish Laird, the most arrogant man of his time, approaches the great, grumpy teacher in his shabby little attic with such reverence; it shows a true respect for greatness—a worship of Heroes, at a time when neither Heroes nor worship were thought to exist. Heroes seem to always 411 exist, along with a certain admiration for them! We’ll also take the liberty of completely rejecting the witty Frenchman’s claim that no man is a Hero to his servant. If that’s the case, it’s not the Hero’s fault but the servant’s: his soul is just a lowly servant-soul! He expects his Hero to appear in royal attire, walking gracefully, with trains behind him and trumpets sounding ahead. It should really say, no man can be a Grand-Monarque to his servant. Strip your Louis XIV of his royal regalia, and what you’re left with is just a poor, forked radish with a bizarrely carved head;—impressive to no servant. The servant doesn’t recognize a Hero when he sees one! Alas, no: it takes a certain kind of Hero to do that;—and one of the world’s needs, in this as in many other areas, is mostly a lack of such.
On the whole, shall we not say, that Boswell’s admiration was well bestowed; that he could have found no soul in all England so worthy of bending down before? Shall we not say, of this great mournful Johnson too, that he guided his difficult confused existence wisely; led it well, like a right-valiant man? That waste chaos of Authorship by trade; that waste chaos of Scepticism in religion and politics, in life-theory and life-practice; in his poverty, in his dust and dimness, with the sick body and the rusty coat: he made it do for him, like a brave man. Not wholly without a loadstar in the Eternal; he had still a loadstar, as the brave all need to have: with his eye set on that, he would change his course for nothing in these confused vortices of the lower sea of Time. ‘To the Spirit of Lies, bearing death and hunger, he would in no wise strike his flag.’ Brave old Samuel: ultimus Romanorum!
Overall, can we not say that Boswell’s admiration was well placed; that he could have found no one in all of England more deserving of respect? Can we not also say of this great, sorrowful Johnson that he navigated his complicated, confusing life wisely; led it well, like a truly courageous man? That chaotic existence of making a living as a writer; that chaotic skepticism in religion and politics, in theory and practice of life; in his poverty, in his obscurity, with his sick body and worn-out coat: he made it work for him, like a brave man. Not completely without a guiding star in the Eternal; he still had a guiding star, as all courageous people need to have: with his focus on that, he wouldn’t change his course for anything in these troubled currents of the lower sea of Time. “To the Spirit of Lies, bringing death and hunger, he would never lower his flag.” Brave old Samuel: ultimus Romanorum!
Of Rousseau and his Heroism I cannot say so much. He is not what I call a strong man. A morbid, excitable, spasmodic man; at best, intense rather than strong. He had not ‘the talent of Silence,’ an invaluable talent; which few Frenchmen, or indeed men of any sort in these times, excel in! The suffering man ought really ‘to consume his own smoke;’ there is no good in emitting smoke till you have made it into fire,—which, in the 412metaphorical sense too, all smoke is capable of becoming! Rousseau has not depth or width, not calm force for difficulty; the first characteristic of true greatness. A fundamental mistake to call vehemence and rigidity strength! A man is not strong who takes convulsion-fits; though six men cannot hold him then. He that can walk under the heaviest weight without staggering, he is the strong man. We need forever, especially in these loud-shrieking days, to remind ourselves of that. A man who cannot hold his peace, till the time come for speaking and acting, is no right man.
Of Rousseau and his heroism, I can't say much. He's not what I consider a strong man. He's a sensitive, excitable, and erratic man; at best, he's intense rather than truly strong. He lacked 'the talent of Silence,' which is a priceless skill that few Frenchmen, or indeed any men these days, seem to possess! A suffering person should really 'consume his own smoke;' there's no point in letting out smoke until you've turned it into fire—which, metaphorically speaking, all smoke can become! Rousseau lacks depth and breadth; he doesn't have the calm strength needed to face challenges, which is the first mark of true greatness. It’s a fundamental mistake to confuse passion and rigidity with strength! A man isn’t strong just because he goes into fits of convulsions, even if six men can’t restrain him then. The truly strong man is the one who can carry the heaviest burden without faltering. We need to constantly remind ourselves of that, especially in these noisy, chaotic times. A man who can’t hold his peace until it’s time to speak and act isn’t a proper man.
Poor Rousseau’s face is to me expressive of him. A high but narrow contracted intensity in it: bony brows; deep, straight-set eyes, in which there is something bewildered-looking,—bewildered, peering with lynx-eagerness. A face full of misery, even ignoble misery, and also of the antagonism against that; something mean, plebeian there, redeemed only by intensity: the face of what is called a Fanatic,—a sadly contracted Hero! We name him here because, with all his drawbacks, and they are many, he has the first and chief characteristic of a Hero: he is heartily in earnest. In earnest, if ever man was; as none of these French Philosophes were. Nay, one would say, of an earnestness too great for his otherwise sensitive, rather feeble nature; and which indeed in the end drove him into the strangest incoherences, almost delirations. There had come, at last, to be a kind of madness in him: his Ideas possessed him like demons; hurried him so about, drove him over steep places!—
Poor Rousseau’s face expresses who he is. It has a high but narrow intensity: bony brows, deep, straight-set eyes that look bewildered—bewildered, peering with keen eagerness. His face is full of misery, even a sort of ignoble misery, along with a resistance to it; there’s something petty and common about it, redeemed only by intensity: the face of what is called a Fanatic—a sadly contracted Hero! We mention him here because, despite his many shortcomings, he possesses the first and foremost characteristic of a Hero: he is wholeheartedly in earnest. Truly earnest, more than any man I know; as none of those French Philosophes were. In fact, one might argue that his earnestness is almost too much for his otherwise sensitive and rather fragile nature, which eventually led him into strange incoherences, almost delirium. There had developed a sort of madness in him: his Ideas possessed him like demons, hurrying him around and driving him over steep places!
The fault and misery of Rousseau was what we easily name by a single word Egoism; which is indeed the source and summary of all faults and miseries whatsoever. He had not perfected himself into victory over mere Desire; a mean hunger, in many sorts, was still the motive principle of him. I am afraid he was a very vain man; hungry for the praises of men. You remember Genlis’s experience of him. She took Jean Jacques to the Theatre; he bargaining for a strict incognito,—”He would not be seen there for the world!” The curtain did happen nevertheless to be drawn aside: the Pit recognised Jean Jacques, but took no great notice 413of him! He expressed the bitterest indignation; gloomed all evening, spake no other than surly words. The glib Countess remained entirely convinced that his anger was not at being seen, but at not being applauded when seen. How the whole nature of the man is poisoned; nothing but suspicion, self-isolation, fierce moody ways! He could not live with anybody. A man of some rank from the country, who visited him often, and used to sit with him, expressing all reverence and affection for him, comes one day, finds Jean Jacques full of the sourest unintelligible humour. “Monsieur,” said Jean Jacques, with flaming eyes, “I know why you come here. You come to see what a poor life I lead; how little is in my poor pot that is boiling there. Well, look into the pot! There is half a pound of meat, one carrot and three onions; that is all: go and tell the whole world that, if you like, Monsieur!”—A man of this sort was far gone. The whole world got itself supplied with anecdotes for light laughter, for a certain theatrical interest, from these perversions and contortions of poor Jean Jacques. Alas, to him they were not laughing or theatrical; too real to him! The contortions of a dying gladiator: the crowded amphitheatre looks-on with entertainment; but the gladiator is in agonies and dying.
The fault and suffering of Rousseau can easily be summed up in one word: Egoism; it really is the root and summary of all faults and suffering. He hadn’t mastered the ability to overcome basic Desire; a basic hunger, in many forms, still drove him. I’m afraid he was a very vain man, hungry for the approval of others. You remember Genlis’s experience with him. She took Jean Jacques to the theater, and he insisted on a strict incognito—“He wouldn’t want to be seen there for the world!” However, the curtain was drawn aside anyway: the audience recognized Jean Jacques but didn’t pay him much attention. He expressed the deepest indignation; sulked all evening, speaking nothing but grumpy words. The smooth-talking Countess was completely convinced that his anger wasn’t from being seen, but from not being applauded when he was. How his whole character is poisoned; filled only with suspicion, self-isolation, and fierce moodiness! He couldn’t stand to be around anyone. A man of some status from the countryside, who visited him often and treated him with respect and affection, came one day to find Jean Jacques in the foulest, most incomprehensible humor. “Monsieur,” Jean Jacques said with fiery eyes, “I know why you’re here. You’ve come to see what a miserable life I lead; to see how little is in my poor pot boiling over there. Well, take a look! There’s half a pound of meat, one carrot, and three onions; that’s all—go tell the whole world that if you want, Monsieur!”—A man like this was in deep distress. The whole world got to hear stories for light amusement and some theatrical interest from the strange behaviors and twists of poor Jean Jacques. Alas, to him they were not funny or performative; they were far too real! The struggles of a dying gladiator: the packed amphitheater watches with entertainment, but the gladiator is in agony and dying.
And yet this Rousseau, as we say, with his passionate appeals to Mothers, with his Contrat-social, with his celebrations of Nature, even of savage life in Nature, did once more touch upon Reality, struggle towards Reality; was doing the function of a Prophet to his Time. As he could, and as the Time could! Strangely through all that defacement, degradation and almost madness, there is in the inmost heart of poor Rousseau a spark of real heavenly fire. Once more, out of the element of that withered mocking Philosophism, Scepticism and Persiflage, there has arisen in that man the ineradicable feeling and knowledge that this Life of ours is true; not a Scepticism, Theorem, or Persiflage, but a Fact, an awful Reality. Nature had made that revelation to him; had ordered him to speak it out. He got it spoken out; if not well and clearly, then ill and dimly,—as clearly as he could. Nay what are all errors 414and perversities of his, even those stealings of ribbons aimless confused miseries and vagabondisms, if we will interpret them kindly, but the blinkard dazzlements and staggerings to and fro of a man sent on an errand he is too weak for, by a path he cannot yet find? Men are led by strange ways. One should have tolerance for a man, hope of him; leave him to try yet what he will do. While life lasts, hope lasts for every man.
And yet this Rousseau, as we say, with his passionate appeals to mothers, with his Social Contract, with his celebrations of nature, even the wild side of life in nature, did once again connect with reality, striving towards it; he was fulfilling the role of a prophet for his time. As much as he could, and as much as the time allowed! Strangely, through all that destruction, degradation, and almost madness, there is in the deepest heart of poor Rousseau a spark of real divine fire. Once more, from the midst of that withered mocking philosophy, skepticism, and sarcasm, there has emerged in that man an unshakeable feeling and understanding that this life of ours is true; not a skepticism, theorem, or sarcasm, but a fact, a harsh reality. Nature revealed that to him; it compelled him to express it. He managed to express it; if not well and clearly, then poorly and vaguely— as clearly as he could. And what are all his errors and flaws, even those aimless wanderings and confused struggles, if we interpret them kindly, but the bewildered dazzlements and falterings of a man sent on a mission he is too weak for, along a path he cannot yet find? People are guided in strange ways. One should have tolerance for a man, hope for him; allow him to keep trying at what he will do. As long as life lasts, hope lasts for everyone.
Of Rousseau’s literary talents, greatly celebrated still among his countrymen, I do not say much. His Books, like himself, are what I call unhealthy; not the good sort of Books. There is a sensuality in Rousseau. Combined with such an intellectual gift as his, it makes pictures of a certain gorgeous attractiveness: but they are not genuinely poetical. Not white sunlight: something operatic; a kind of rosepink, artificial bedizenment. It is frequent, or rather it is universal, among the French since his time. Madame de Staël has something of it; St. Pierre; and down onwards to the present astonishing convulsionary ‘Literature of Desperation,’ it is everywhere abundant. That same rosepink is not the right hue. Look at a Shakspeare, at a Goethe, even at a Walter Scott! He who has once seen into this, has seen the difference of the True from the Sham-True, and will discriminate them ever afterwards.
Of Rousseau’s literary talents, which are still highly regarded among his fellow countrymen, I won’t say much. His books, like him, are what I consider unhealthy; not the good kind of books. There’s a sensuality in Rousseau. When combined with his intellectual gift, it creates images that are strikingly attractive, but they aren’t genuinely poetic. It’s not pure sunlight; it’s something operatic; a sort of artificial rose-pink embellishment. This tendency is common, or rather universal, among the French since his time. Madame de Staël has some of it; St. Pierre does too; and right up to the current chaotic ‘Literature of Desperation,’ it’s everywhere. That same rose-pink is not the right color. Look at Shakespeare, Goethe, or even Walter Scott! Once someone realizes this, they can distinguish the True from the Sham-True and will continue to do so.
We had to observe in Johnson how much good a Prophet, under all disadvantages and disorganisations, can accomplish for the world. In Rousseau we are called to look rather at the fearful amount of evil which, under such disorganisation, may accompany the good. Historically it is a most pregnant spectacle, that of Rousseau. Banished into Paris garrets, in the gloomy company of his own Thoughts and Necessities there; driven from post to pillar; fretted, exasperated till the heart of him went mad, he had grown to feel deeply that the world was not his friend nor the world’s law. It was expedient, if anyway possible, that such a man should not have been set in flat hostility with the world. He could be cooped into garrets, laughed at as a maniac, left to starve like a wild beast in his cage;—but he could not be hindered from setting the world on fire. The French Revolution found its Evangelist in Rousseau. 415His semi-delirious speculations on the miseries of civilised life, the preferability of the savage to the civilised, and suchlike, helped well to produce a whole delirium in France generally. True, you may well ask, What could the world, the governors of the world, do with such a man? Difficult to say what the governors of the world could do with him! What he could do with them is unhappily clear enough,—guillotine a great many of them! Enough now of Rousseau.
We had to notice in Johnson how much good a Prophet, despite all the challenges and chaos, can achieve for the world. In Rousseau, we’re prompted to consider the significant amount of harm that can accompany the good in such disorder. Historically, Rousseau's situation is quite striking. Banished to shabby Paris rooms, surrounded by his own thoughts and needs, constantly moving from one problem to another, frustrated and worn down to the point of madness, he came to realize that the world was not on his side nor did it follow the world’s rules. It was necessary, if at all possible, that such a man should not be outright against the world. He could be confined to his tiny rooms, mocked as a madman, left to starve like a wild animal in a cage—but he could not be stopped from igniting a fire in the world. The French Revolution found its preacher in Rousseau. 415 His nearly frantic thoughts on the struggles of civilized life, the idea that savagery is better than civilization, and others like that helped create a widespread frenzy in France. It’s understandable to ask, what could the world, the leaders of the world, do with a man like him? It’s hard to say what the leaders could do with him! What he could do to them is painfully clear—guillotine a great many of them! Enough now of Rousseau.
It was a curious phenomenon, in the withered, unbelieving, secondhand Eighteenth Century, that of a Hero starting up, among the artificial pasteboard figures and productions, in the guise of a Robert Burns. Like a little well in the rocky desert places,—like a sudden splendour of Heaven in the artificial Vauxhall! People knew not what to make of it. They took it for a piece of the Vauxhall fire-work; alas, it let itself be so taken, though struggling half-blindly, as in bitterness of death, against that! Perhaps no man had such a false reception from his fellow-men. Once more a very wasteful life-drama was enacted under the sun.
It was an odd phenomenon, in the jaded and skeptical secondhand Eighteenth Century, that a Hero emerged, among the fake cardboard characters and productions, in the form of a Robert Burns. Like a little oasis in the rocky desert, like a sudden burst of brilliance in the artificial Vauxhall! People didn't know what to make of it. They assumed it was just part of the Vauxhall fireworks; unfortunately, it allowed itself to be viewed that way, even while struggling, almost blindly, against it in a desperate way. Perhaps no one ever received such a distorted impression from their fellow humans. Once again, a very extravagant life-drama played out under the sun.
The tragedy of Burns’s life is known to all of you. Surely we may say, if discrepancy between place held and place merited constitute perverseness of lot for a man, no lot could be more perverse than Burns’s. Among those secondhand acting-figures, mimes for most part, of the Eighteenth Century, once more a giant Original man; one of those men who reach down to the perennial Deeps, who take rank with the Heroic among men: and he was born in a poor Ayrshire hut. The largest soul of all the British lands came among us in the shape of a hard-handed Scottish Peasant.
The tragedy of Burns's life is known to all of you. Surely we can say that if a gap between the position one holds and the position one deserves represents a cruel fate for a person, then no fate could be more cruel than Burns's. Among those mostly secondhand performers, the mimes of the Eighteenth Century, there was once again a giant Original man; one of those who connects with the deep, timeless truths and stands among the greats of humanity: and he was born in a poor cottage in Ayrshire. The greatest spirit of all the British Isles came to us in the form of a hard-working Scottish peasant.
His Father, a poor toiling man, tried various things; did not succeed in any; was involved in continual difficulties. The Steward, Factor as the Scotch call him, used to send letters and threatenings, Burns says, ‘which threw us all into tears.’ The brave, hard-toiling, hard-suffering Father, his brave heroine of a wife; and those children, of whom Robert was one! In this Earth, so wide otherwise, no shelter for them. The letters ‘threw us all into tears:’ figure it. The brave Father, I say 416always;—a silent Hero and Poet; without whom the son had never been a speaking one! Burns’s Schoolmaster came afterwards to London, learnt what good society was; but declares that in no meeting of men did he ever enjoy better discourse than at the hearth of this peasant. And his poor ‘seven acres of nursery-ground,’—not that, nor the miserable patch of clay-farm, nor anything he tried to get a living by, would prosper with him; he had a sore unequal battle all his days. But he stood to it valiantly; a wise, faithful, unconquerable man;—swallowing-down how many sore sufferings daily into silence; fighting like an unseen Hero,—nobody publishing newspaper paragraphs about his nobleness; voting pieces of plate to him! However, he was not lost: nothing is lost. Robert is there; the outcome of him,—and indeed of many generations of such as him.
His father, a poor hardworking man, tried various things; he didn’t succeed at any and faced constant difficulties. The steward, or factor as they call him in Scotland, would send letters and threats that, as Burns said, “made us all cry.” The brave, hard-working, and hard-suffering father, his heroic wife, and those children, including Robert! In this vast world, there was no shelter for them. The letters “made us all cry”—just imagine. The brave father, I say, always; a silent hero and poet, without whom the son would never have found his voice! Burns's schoolmaster later came to London, learned what good company was, but claimed that he never enjoyed better conversation than at the home of this peasant. And his poor "seven acres of nursery-ground"—none of that, nor the miserable little clay farm, nor anything he tried to make a living from, would prosper for him; he fought an unfair battle all his life. But he persevered valiantly; a wise, loyal, unbreakable man—swallowing down countless pains in silence, fighting like an unseen hero—no one publishing newspaper articles about his nobility or giving him awards! However, he was not forgotten: nothing is lost. Robert is there; the result of him—and indeed of many generations like him.
This Burns appears under every disadvantage: uninstructed, poor, born only to hard manual toil; and writing, when it came to that, in a rustic special dialect, known only to a small province of the country he lived in. Had he written, even what he did write, in the general language of England, I doubt not he had already become universally recognised as being, or capable to be, one of our greatest men. That he should have tempted so many to penetrate through the rough husk of that dialect of his, is proof that there lay something far from common within it. He has gained a certain recognition, and is continuing to do so over all quarters of our wide Saxon world: wheresoever a Saxon dialect is spoken, it begins to be understood, by personal inspection of this and the other, that one of the most considerable Saxon men of the Eighteenth century was an Ayrshire Peasant named Robert Burns. Yes, I will say, here too was a piece of the right Saxon stuff: strong as the Harz-rock, rooted in the depths of the world;—rock, yet with wells of living softness in it! A wild impetuous whirlwind of passion and faculty slumbered quiet there; such heavenly melody dwelling in the heart of it. A noble rough genuineness; homely, rustic, honest; true simplicity of strength: with its 417lightning-fire, with its soft dewy pity;—like the old Norse Thor, the Peasant-god!—
This Burns faced every disadvantage: uneducated, poor, born only for hard labor, and writing, when he did, in a rural dialect known only to a small part of the country he lived in. If he had written, even what he did write, in the standard English of his time, I have no doubt he would have already been recognized as one of our greatest figures. The fact that so many people have been drawn to look beyond the rough exterior of his dialect shows that something truly exceptional lay within it. He has gained a certain recognition and continues to do so across our vast Saxon world: wherever a Saxon dialect is spoken, it is becoming clear through personal exploration that one of the most significant Saxon individuals of the Eighteenth century was an Ayrshire peasant named Robert Burns. Yes, I will say, here too is a piece of true Saxon character: strong as rock, rooted in the depths of the earth;—a rock that still has springs of living softness! A wild, passionate whirlwind of creativity lay quietly there, with a heavenly melody in its heart. A noble, rugged authenticity; humble, rustic, honest; a pure simplicity of strength: with its 417flashing fire, with its gentle, dewy compassion;—like the old Norse Thor, the Peasant-god!
Burns’s Brother Gilbert, a man of much sense and worth, has told me that Robert, in his young days, in spite of their hardship, was usually the gayest of speech; a fellow of infinite frolic, laughter, sense and heart; far pleasanter to hear there, stript cutting peats in the bog, or suchlike, than he ever afterwards knew him. I can well believe it. This basis of mirth (‘fond gaillard,’ as old Marquis Mirabeau calls it), a primal-element of sunshine and joyfulness, coupled with his other deep and earnest qualities, is one of the most attractive characteristics of Burns. A large fund of Hope dwells in him; spite of his tragical history, he is not a mourning man. He shakes his sorrows gallantly aside; bounds forth victorious over them. It is as the lion shaking ‘dew-drops from his mane;’ as the swift-bounding horse, that laughs at the shaking of the spear.—But indeed, Hope, Mirth, of the sort like Burns’s, are they not the outcome properly of warm generous affection,—such as is the beginning of all to every man?
Burns's brother Gilbert, a sensible and worthy man, has told me that Robert, even in his younger days, despite their struggles, was usually the most cheerful in conversation; a guy full of fun, laughter, wisdom, and heart; much more enjoyable to listen to while they were cutting peat in the bog than he ever was later on. I can totally believe it. This foundation of joy ('fond gaillard', as the old Marquis Mirabeau puts it), a fundamental element of sunshine and happiness, combined with his other deep and sincere traits, is one of the most appealing aspects of Burns. A strong sense of hope lives within him; despite his tragic history, he is not a man who mourns. He shakes off his sorrows bravely; he leaps forward, triumphant over them. It's like a lion shaking 'dew-drops from his mane'; like a fast-running horse that laughs at the shaking of a spear.—But really, aren’t hope and joy, like Burns’s, the result of warm, generous affection—the very beginning for every person?
You would think it strange if I called Burns the most gifted British soul we had in all that century of his: and yet I believe the day is coming when there will be little danger in saying so. His writings, all that he did under such obstructions, are only a poor fragment of him. Professor Stewart remarked very justly, what indeed is true of all Poets good for much, that his poetry was not any particular faculty; but the general result of a naturally vigorous original mind expressing itself in that way. Burns’s gifts, expressed in conversation, are the theme of all that ever heard him. All kinds of gifts: from the gracefulest utterances of courtesy, to the highest fire of passionate speech; loud floods of mirth, soft wailings of affection, laconic emphasis, clear piercing insight; all was in him. Witty duchesses celebrate him as a man whose speech ‘led them off their feet.’ This is beautiful: but still more beautiful that which Mr. Lockhart has recorded, which I have more than once alluded to, How the waiters and ostlers at inns 418would get out of bed, and come crowding to hear this man speak! Waiters and ostlers:—they too were men, and here was a man! I have heard much about his speech; but one of the best things I ever heard of it was, last year, from a venerable gentleman long familiar with him. That it was speech distinguished by always having something in it. “He spoke rather little than much,” this old man told me; “sat rather silent in those early days, as in the company of persons above him; and always when he did speak, it was to throw new light on the matter.” I know not why any one should ever speak otherwise!—But if we look at his general force of soul, his healthy robustness everyway, the rugged down-rightness, penetration, generous valour and manfulness that was in him,—where shall we readily find a better-gifted man?
You might find it odd if I called Burns the most talented British soul we had in his entire century; however, I believe the day is coming when it won’t seem risky to say so. His writings, all that he accomplished despite various challenges, are just a small piece of who he was. Professor Stewart rightly pointed out, and this is true for many productive poets, that his poetry wasn't about any specific ability but rather the overall outcome of a naturally strong, original mind expressing itself in that way. Burns's talents, displayed in conversation, are what everyone who met him remembers. All kinds of abilities: from the most graceful features of politeness to the highest intensity of passionate speech; loud bursts of laughter, soft expressions of love, concise emphasis, and sharp clarity—all of it was in him. Witty duchesses praised him as someone whose words ‘knocked them off their feet.’ This is lovely, but even more beautiful is what Mr. Lockhart wrote, which I’ve referred to more than once, about how waiters and stablehands at inns would get out of bed and crowd around to listen to this man speak! Waiters and stablehands—they were men too, and here was a true man! I’ve heard a lot about his speech, but one of the best things I heard last year came from an elderly gentleman who knew him well. He said it was speech marked by always having something worth saying. “He spoke rather little than much,” this old man told me; “he mostly sat quietly in those early days, as if in the company of people he respected; and whenever he spoke, it was to shed new light on the topic.” I don’t know why anyone would ever speak differently! But if we consider his overall strength of character, his healthy robustness in every way, the rugged straightforwardness, insight, generous courage, and true manliness in him—where else will we easily find someone more gifted?
Among the great men of the Eighteenth Century, I sometimes feel as if Burns might be found to resemble Mirabeau more than any other. They differ widely in vesture; yet look at them intrinsically. There is the same burly thick-necked strength of body as of soul;—built, in both cases, on what the old Marquis calls a fond gaillard. By nature, by course of breeding, indeed by nation, Mirabeau has much more of bluster; a noisy, forward, unresting man. But the characteristic of Mirabeau too is veracity and sense, power of true insight, superiority of vision. The thing that he says is worth remembering. It is a flash of insight into some object or other: so do both these men speak. The same raging passions; capable too in both of manifesting themselves as the tenderest noble affections. Wit, wild laughter, energy, directness, sincerity: these were in both. The types of the two men are not dissimilar. Burns too could have governed, debated in National Assemblies; politicised, as few could. Alas, the courage which had to exhibit itself in capture of smuggling schooners in the Solway Frith; in keeping silence over so much, where no good speech, but only inarticulate rage was possible: this might have bellowed forth Ushers de Brézé and the like; and made itself visible to all men, in managing of kingdoms, in ruling of great ever-memorable epochs! But they said to 419him reprovingly, his Official Superiors said, and wrote: ‘You are to work, not think.’ Of your thinking-faculty, the greatest in this land, we have no need; you are to gauge beer there; for that only are you wanted. Very notable;—and worth mentioning, though we know what is to be said and answered! As if Thought, Power of Thinking, were not, at all times, in all places and situations of the world, precisely the thing that was wanted. The fatal man, is he not always the unthinking man, the man who cannot think and see; but only grope, and hallucinate, and missee the nature of the thing he works with? He missees it, mistakes it as we say; takes it for one thing, and it is another thing,—and leaves him standing like a Futility there! He is the fatal man; unutterably fatal, put in the high places of men.—“Why complain of this?” say some: “Strength is mournfully denied its arena; that was true from of old.” Doubtless; and the worse for the arena, answer I! Complaining profits little; stating of the truth may profit. That a Europe, with its French Revolution just breaking out, finds no need of a Burns except for gauging beer,—is a thing I, for one, cannot rejoice at!—
Among the great figures of the Eighteenth Century, I sometimes think Burns might resemble Mirabeau more than anyone else. They look very different on the outside, but if you consider them internally, there’s a shared strong, solid build both physically and mentally; both are what the old Marquis describes as a fond gaillard. By nature, by upbringing, and certainly by nationality, Mirabeau is much more boastful; a loud, forward, restless man. However, what stands out about Mirabeau is his truthfulness and insight, his ability to see things clearly. What he expresses is worth remembering. It’s an insightful flash about some topic or another: both these men communicate in this way. They share the same intense passions, and both can also express the gentlest noble affections. Wit, wild laughter, energy, straightforwardness, sincerity—these traits were present in both men. Their types are not that dissimilar. Burns could have led, participated in National Assemblies, and engaged in politics like few could. Sadly, the bravery that manifested in capturing smuggling ships in the Solway Frith; in remaining silent about so much when only inarticulate rage was possible—that could have made him a standout like Ushers de Brézé and could have shown itself in governing kingdoms and leading significant historical eras! But his superiors reproached him and said: ‘You’re meant to work, not think.’ They claimed they had no use for your thinking skills, the greatest in this land; they just wanted you to measure beer. It’s quite remarkable—and worth mentioning, though we know the usual responses! As if thought, the ability to think, wasn’t always the necessary thing in every place and situation in the world. The truly damaging individuals are those who cannot think or see, who merely fumble and hallucinate, misunderstanding the nature of what they’re dealing with. They misinterpret it and confuse it—seeing one thing when it’s really something else—and end up in a state of futility! These are the truly harmful individuals, irreparably harmful when they occupy high positions in society. “Why complain about this?” some say: “Strength is sadly denied its venue; that has always been true.” Certainly; and that’s a loss for the arena, I would argue! Complaining doesn’t help much; acknowledging the truth might. That Europe, with its French Revolution just starting, finds no use for a Burns except for measuring beer is something I, for one, cannot celebrate!
Once more we have to say here, that the chief quality of Burns is the sincerity of him. So in his Poetry, so in his Life. The Song he sings is not of fantasticalities; it is of a thing felt, really there; the prime merit of this, as of all in him, and of his Life generally, is truth. The Life of Burns is what we may call a great tragic sincerity. A sort of savage sincerity,—not cruel, far from that; but wild, wrestling naked with the truth of things. In that sense, there is something of the savage in all great men.
Once again, we must emphasize that Burns's main quality is his sincerity. This is true in both his poetry and his life. The songs he sings aren't about fantasies; they're rooted in real feelings and genuine experiences. The central virtue of everything he does, and of his life overall, is truth. Burns's life can be described as a profound tragic sincerity. It's a kind of raw honesty—not harsh, but unrefined, grappling openly with the reality of things. In that way, there's a touch of the wild in all great individuals.
Hero-worship,—Odin, Burns? Well; these Men of Letters too were not without a kind of Hero-worship: but what a strange condition has that got into now! The waiters and ostlers of Scotch inns, prying about the door, eager to catch any word that fell from Burns, were doing unconscious reverence to the Heroic. Johnson had his Boswell for worshipper. Rousseau had worshippers enough; princes calling on him in his mean garret; the great, the beautiful doing reverence to the 420poor moonstruck man. For himself a most portentous contradiction; the two ends of his life not to be brought into harmony. He sits at the tables of grandees; and has to copy music for his own living. He cannot even get his music copied. “By dint of dining out,” says he, “I run the risk of dying by starvation at home.” For his worshippers too a most questionable thing! If doing Hero-worship well or badly be the test of vital wellbeing or illbeing to a generation, can we say that these generations are very first-rate?—And yet our heroic Men of Letters do teach, govern, are kings, priests, or what you like to call them; intrinsically there is no preventing it by any means whatever. The world has to obey him who thinks and sees in the world. The world can alter the manner of that; can either have it as blessed continuous summer sunshine, or as unblessed black thunder and tornado,—with unspeakable difference of profit for the world! The manner of it is very alterable; the matter and fact of it is not alterable by any power under the sky. Light; or, failing that, lightning: the world can take its choice. Not whether we call an Odin god, prophet, priest, or what we call him; but whether we believe the word he tells us: there it all lies. If it be a true word, we shall have to believe it; believing it, we shall have to do it. What name or welcome we give him or it, is a point that concerns ourselves mainly. It, the new Truth, new deeper revealing of the Secret of this Universe, is verily of the nature of a message from on high; and must and will have itself obeyed.—
Hero-worship—Odin, Burns? Well, these writers also had their own form of hero-worship, but how strange is the state of it now! The waiters and stable hands at Scottish inns, hovering around the door, eager to catch any words from Burns, were unconsciously paying homage to the heroic. Johnson had his Boswell to idolize him. Rousseau had plenty of admirers; even princes visited him in his humble garret, the great and beautiful showing reverence to the poor, lovesick man. For him, it was a confusing contradiction; the two extremes of his life never aligned. He dined with nobles but had to copy music to make a living. He couldn't even get his music copied. “By dining out,” he said, “I risk starving at home.” As for his admirers, that’s questionable too! If the way we do hero-worship defines a generation's well-being, can we say that these generations are top-notch? Yet, our heroic writers do educate, lead, and are like kings and priests, and there’s no way to stop that. The world has to listen to those who think and perceive things deeply. The world can change how it listens—whether it experiences blessed, endless summer sunshine or unblessed, dark storms and tornadoes—with a huge difference in the outcome! The way of it can change; the essence of it cannot be altered by any power on earth. Light, or if that fails, lightning: the world can choose. It’s not about whether we call Odin a god, prophet, or priest; it’s about whether we believe the message he delivers. That’s where it all matters. If it’s a true message, we will have to believe it; believing it means we will have to act on it. What name or welcome we give him or it is mainly a concern for ourselves. The new Truth, the deeper revelation of the universe’s secret, truly feels like a message from above, and it must and will be obeyed.
My last remark is on that notablest phasis of Burns’s history,—his visit to Edinburgh. Often it seems to me as if his demeanour there were the highest proof he gave of what a fund of worth and genuine manhood was in him. If we think of it, few heavier burdens could be laid on the strength of a man. So sudden; all common Lionism, which ruins innumerable men, was as nothing to this. It is as if Napoleon had been made a King of, not gradually, but at once from the Artillery Lieutenancy in the Regiment La Fère. Burns, still only in his twenty-seventh year, is no longer even a ploughman; he is flying to the West Indies to escape 421disgrace and a jail. This month he is a ruined peasant, his wages seven pounds a year, and these gone from him: next month he is in the blaze of rank and beauty, handing down jewelled Duchesses to dinner; the cynosure of all eyes! Adversity is sometimes hard upon a man; but for one man who can stand prosperity, there are a hundred that will stand adversity. I admire much the way in which Burns met all this. Perhaps no man one could point out, was ever so sorely tried, and so little forgot himself. Tranquil, unastonished; not abashed, not inflated, neither awkwardness nor affectation: he feels that he there is the man Robert Burns; that the ‘rank is but the guinea-stamp;’ that the celebrity is but the candle-light, which will show what man, not in the least make him a better or other man! Alas, it may readily, unless he look to it, make him a worse man; a wretched inflated wind-bag,—inflated till he burst and become a dead lion; for whom, as some one has said, ‘there is no resurrection of the body;’ worse than a living dog!—Burns is admirable here.
My final comment is about the most significant moment in Burns's life—his visit to Edinburgh. It often seems to me that his behavior there was the clearest evidence of his worth and true manhood. If you think about it, few things could weigh more heavily on a person. It was so sudden; all the typical attention that ruins countless people meant nothing compared to this. It's like if Napoleon had jumped straight from being an Artillery Lieutenant in the Regiment La Fère to being a King. Burns, still only twenty-seven, is no longer even a farmer; he's fleeing to the West Indies to avoid disgrace and imprisonment. This month he’s a ruined peasant earning seven pounds a year, and those are gone; next month he's surrounded by nobility and beauty, hosting dinner with jeweled Duchesses, the center of attention! Adversity can be tough on a person, but for every one person who can handle success, a hundred can handle hardship. I really admire how Burns handled all of this. Perhaps no one else has ever been so severely tested and remained so grounded. Calm, unfazed; neither embarrassed nor arrogant, without awkwardness or pretense: he knows he is Robert Burns; that 'rank is just a stamp on a coin;' that fame is merely a light that reveals who a person is, not what makes them a better or different person! Unfortunately, if he's not careful, it can easily make him a worse person; a miserable, inflated windbag—blown up until he bursts and becomes a dead lion; for whom, as someone has said, ‘there is no resurrection of the body;’ worse than a living dog!—Burns truly shines here.
And yet, alas, as I have observed elsewhere, these Lion-hunters were the ruin and death of Burns. It was they that rendered it impossible for him to live! They gathered round him in his Farm; hindered his industry; no place was remote enough from them. He could not get his Lionism forgotten, honestly as he was disposed to do so. He falls into discontents, into miseries, faults; the world getting ever more desolate for him; health, character, peace of mind all gone;—solitary enough now. It is tragical to think of! These men came but to see him; it was out of no sympathy with him, nor no hatred to him. They came to get a little amusement: they got their amusement;—and the Hero’s life went for it!
And yet, unfortunately, as I've noted before, these Lion-hunters were the downfall of Burns. They made it impossible for him to live! They surrounded him at his farm, disrupted his work; there was no place far enough away from them. He couldn't escape his Lionism, even though he genuinely wanted to. He fell into frustration, misery, and flaws; the world became increasingly bleak for him; his health, reputation, and peace of mind all vanished—he was now quite alone. It's tragic to think about! These men came just to see him; it wasn't out of any sympathy or hatred towards him. They came for a bit of entertainment: they got their fun— and the Hero's life paid the price!
Richter says, in the Island of Sumatra, there is a kind of ‘Light-chafers,’ large Fire-flies, which people stick upon spits, and illuminate the ways with at night. Persons of condition can thus travel with a pleasant radiance, which they much admire. Great honour to the Fire-flies! But—!—
Richter says that on the Island of Sumatra, there are a type of ‘Light-chafers,’ large fireflies that people put on skewers to light up the paths at night. Well-off individuals can travel with a nice glow, which they greatly appreciate. A great honor to the fireflies! But—!—
LECTURE VI
Lecture 6
THE HERO AS KING. CROMWELL, NAPOLEON: MODERN REVOLUTIONISM.
[Friday, 22nd May 1840]
[Friday, May 22, 1840]
We come now to the last form of Heroism; that which we call Kingship. The Commander over men; he to whose will our wills are to be subordinated, and loyally surrender themselves, and find their welfare in doing so, may be reckoned the most important of Great Men. He is practically the summary for us of all the various figures of Heroism; Priest, Teacher, whatsoever of earthly or of spiritual dignity we can fancy to reside in a man, embodies itself here, to command over us, to furnish us with constant practical teaching, to tell us for the day and hour what we are to do. He is called Rex, Regulator, Roi: our own name is still better; King, Könning, which means Can-ning, Ableman.
We now arrive at the final form of Heroism, which we refer to as Kingship. The Leader of people; the one whose will our wills are expected to follow, who we loyally submit to and find our well-being in doing so, can be considered the most significant of Great Men. He essentially represents to us all the different aspects of Heroism; the Priest, the Teacher, any form of earthly or spiritual dignity we can imagine existing in a person, manifests here to lead us, to provide us with regular practical guidance, to inform us of what we should do in each moment. He is called Rex, Regulator, Roi: our own term is even better; King, Könning, which translates to Can-ning, Ableman.
Numerous considerations, pointing towards deep, questionable, and indeed unfathomable regions, present themselves here: on the most of which we must resolutely for the present forbear to speak at all. As Burke said that perhaps fair Trial by Jury was the Soul of Government, and that all legislation, administration, parliamentary debating, and the rest of it, went on, in ‘order to bring twelve impartial men into a jury-box;’—so, by much stronger reason, may I say here, that the finding of your Ableman and getting him invested with the symbols of ability, with dignity, worship (worth-ship), royalty, kinghood, or whatever we call it, so that he may actually have room to guide according to his faculty of doing it,—is the business, well or ill accomplished, of all social procedure whatsoever in this world! Hustings-speeches, Parliamentary motions, Reform Bills, French Revolutions, all mean at heart this; or else nothing. Find in any country the Ablest Man that exists there; raise him to the supreme place, and loyally 423reverence him: you have a perfect government for that country; no ballot-box, parliamentary eloquence, voting, constitution-building, or other machinery whatsoever can improve it a whit. It is in the perfect state: an ideal country. The Ablest Man; he means also the truest-hearted, justest, the Noblest Man: what he tells us to do must be precisely the wisest, fittest, that we could anywhere or anyhow learn;—the thing which it will in all ways behove us, with right loyal thankfulness, and nothing doubting, to do! Our doing and life were then, so far as government could regulate it, well regulated; that were the ideal of constitutions.
Numerous factors lead us to deep, questionable, and truly unfathomable areas that we must, for now, refrain from discussing at all. Just as Burke suggested that perhaps fair Trial by Jury is the soul of government, and that all legislation, administration, parliamentary debates, and the like exist to bring twelve impartial people into a jury box, I can assert even more strongly that finding your Ableman and empowering him with the symbols of ability—with dignity, honor (worth-ship), royalty, kingship, or whatever we call it—so that he truly has the ability to lead according to his capacity, is the essential task, successfully or unsuccessfully achieved, of all social actions in this world! Election speeches, parliamentary bills, reform initiatives, French revolutions—all ultimately mean this, or nothing at all. If you can find the most capable person in any country, elevate him to the highest position, and truly respect him, you have created a perfect government for that country; no ballot box, parliamentary eloquence, voting, constitution-making, or any other system can improve it even slightly. It is in its ideal state: a perfect country. The most capable person is also the truest-hearted, fairest, noblest person; what he advises us to do must be the wisest, most suitable guidance we could ever receive;—the very actions that we should, with true loyalty and without doubt, pursue! Our actions and lives would then, as far as governance permits, be well directed; that would be the ideal of constitutions.
Alas, we know very well that Ideals can never be completely embodied in practice. Ideals must ever lie a very great way off; and we will right thankfully content ourselves with any not intolerable approximation thereto! Let no man, as Schiller says, too querulously ‘measure by a scale of perfection the meagre product of reality’ in this poor world of ours. We will esteem him no wise man; we will esteem him a sickly, discontented, foolish man. And yet, on the other hand, it is never to be forgotten that Ideals do exist; that if they be not approximated to at all, the whole matter goes to wreck! Infallibly. No bricklayer builds a wall perfectly perpendicular, mathematically this is not possible; a certain degree of perpendicularity suffices him; and he, like a good bricklayer, who must have done with his job, leaves it so. And yet if he sway too much from the perpendicular; above all, if he throw plummet and level quite away from him, and pile brick on brick heedless, just as it comes to hand—! Such bricklayer, I think, is in a bad way. He has forgotten himself: but the Law of Gravitation does not forget to act on him; he and his wall rush-down into confused welter of ruin!—
Unfortunately, we know very well that ideals can never be completely realized in practice. Ideals will always seem distant, and we should happily settle for any reasonable approximation to them! Let no one, as Schiller says, too harshly 'measure the meager outcome of reality' against a perfect standard in this flawed world of ours. We will not consider him a wise man; we will see him as a sickly, dissatisfied, foolish person. Yet, on the other hand, it must never be forgotten that ideals do exist; if they aren't strived for at all, everything falls apart! Certainly. No bricklayer builds a wall perfectly vertical; mathematically, that's impossible. A certain degree of verticality is enough for him; and like a good bricklayer, who has to finish his work, he leaves it at that. But if he strays too far from being vertical; especially if he disregards plumb and level completely, piling bricks carelessly as they come—! Such a bricklayer, I think, is in trouble. He has lost sight of his purpose: but the law of gravity doesn't forget to act on him; he and his wall will come crashing down into a chaotic mess of destruction!
This is the history of all rebellions, French Revolutions, social explosions in ancient or modern times. You have put the too Unable man at the head of affairs! The too ignoble, unvaliant, fatuous man. You have forgotten that there is any rule, or natural necessity whatever, of putting the Able Man there. Brick must lie on brick as it may and can. Unable Simulacrum of 424Ability, quack, in a word, must adjust himself with quack, in all manner of administration of human things;—which accordingly lie unadministered, fermenting into unmeasured masses of failure, of indigent misery: in the outward, and in the inward or spiritual, miserable millions stretch-out the hand for their due supply, and it is not there. The ‘law of gravitation’ acts; Nature’s laws do none of them forget to act. The miserable millions burst-forth into Sansculottism, or some other sort of madness; bricks and bricklayers lie as a fatal chaos!—
This is the history of all rebellions, French Revolutions, social upheavals in ancient or modern times. You have put the totally Uncapable person in charge! The too ignoble, cowardly, foolish person. You have forgotten that there’s any rule or natural necessity to put the capable person there. Brick must be placed on brick as it can and should. The incapable imitation of 424 ability, quack, in short, must work with quackery in all forms of managing human affairs;—which end up unmanaged, festering into immense failure and desperate misery: in the outward and in the inward or spiritual sense, miserable millions reach out for their rightful support, and it’s not there. The ‘law of gravitation’ is in effect; Nature’s laws never forget to work. The miserable millions erupt into Sansculottism or another form of madness; bricks and bricklayers lie in a disastrous chaos!
Much sorry stuff, written some hundred years ago or more, about the ‘Divine right of Kings,’ moulders unread now in the Public Libraries of this country. Far be it from us to disturb the calm process by which it is disappearing harmlessly from the earth, in those repositories! At the same time, not to let the immense rubbish go without leaving us, as it ought, some soul of it behind—I will say that it did mean something; something true, which it is important for us and all men to keep in mind. To assert that in whatever man you chose to lay hold of (by this or the other plan of clutching at him); and clapt a round piece of metal on the head of, and called King,—there straightway came to reside a divine virtue, so that he became a kind of God, and a Divinity inspired him with faculty and right to rule over you to all lengths: this,—what can we do with this but leave it to rot silently in the Public Libraries? But I will say withal, and that is what these Divine-right men meant, That in Kings, and in all human Authorities, and relations that men god-created can form among each other, there is verily either a Divine Right or else a Diabolic Wrong; one or the other of these two! For it is false altogether, what the last Sceptical Century taught us, that this world is a steam-engine. There is a God in this world; and a God’s-sanction, or else the violation of such, does look-out from all ruling and obedience, from all moral acts of men. There is no act more moral between men than that of rule and obedience. Woe to him that claims obedience when it is not due; woe to him that refuses it when it is! God’s law is in that, I say, however the Parchment-laws 425may run: there is a Divine Right or else a Diabolic Wrong at the heart of every claim that one man makes upon another.
A lot of outdated stuff written over a hundred years ago about the ‘Divine right of Kings’ is sitting unread in the Public Libraries of this country. We shouldn’t interfere with the quiet way it’s slowly fading away from the world in those places! At the same time, we can’t let this immense nonsense go without taking some essence of it with us—we should acknowledge that it did have a meaning; something true, which is important for us and all people to remember. To claim that whenever you chose a man to hold onto (by this method or that) and put a circular piece of metal on his head, calling him King, a divine ability instantly appeared, making him a kind of God with the authority to rule over you—what can we do with that except let it die quietly in the Public Libraries? But I must add, and this is what those Divine-right supporters meant, that in Kings, and all human authorities and relationships that people can create among themselves, there truly exists either a Divine Right or a Diabolical Wrong; it’s one or the other! For it’s completely false what the last skeptical century taught us, that this world is just a machine. There is a God in this world; and God’s approval, or the lack of it, is evident in all ruling and obedience, in all moral actions of people. There is no act more moral between humans than that of ruling and obeying. Woe to the one who demands obedience when it’s not warranted; woe to the one who denies it when it is! God’s law is present in that, I say, regardless of how the Parchment-laws 425 may be written: there is a Divine Right or a Diabolical Wrong at the core of every claim one person makes on another.
It can do none of us harm to reflect on this: in all the relations of life it will concern us; in Loyalty and Royalty, the highest of these. I esteem the modern error, That all goes by self-interest and the checking and balancing of greedy knaveries, and that, in short, there is nothing divine whatever in the association of men, a still more despicable error, natural as it is to an unbelieving century, than that of a ‘divine right’ in people called Kings. I say, Find me the true Könning, King, or Able-man, and he has a divine right over me. That we knew in some tolerable measure how to find him, and that all men were ready to acknowledge his divine right when found: this is precisely the healing which a sick world is everywhere, in these ages, seeking after! The true King, as guide of the practical, has ever something of the Pontiff in him,—guide of the spiritual, from which all practice has its rise. This too is a true saying, That the King is head of the Church.—But we will leave the Polemic stuff of a dead century to lie quiet on its bookshelves.
It doesn’t hurt any of us to think about this: in all our relationships, it's important; especially in Loyalty and Royalty, which are the highest of them. I believe the modern mistake is thinking that everything is driven by self-interest and the constant checking and balancing of greedy scheming, and that, in short, there's nothing noble in the connection between people, which is an even more contemptible error, natural as it may be in a skeptical age, than the idea of a 'divine right' in those called Kings. I say, show me the true King, or able person, and he has a divine right over me. If we knew at least somewhat how to find him, and if all men were willing to recognize his divine right when they did, that would be exactly the solution a troubled world is desperately seeking in these times! The true King, as a guide in the practical, always has a bit of the Pontiff in him—guide of the spiritual, from which all practical matters originate. It is also true that the King is head of the Church. But let’s leave the argumentative issues of a bygone century to rest quietly on their bookshelves.
Certainly it is a fearful business, that of having your Ableman to seek, and not knowing in what manner to proceed about it! That is the world’s sad predicament in these times of ours. They are times of Revolution, and have long been. The bricklayer with his bricks, no longer heedful of plummet or the law of gravitation, have toppled, tumbled, and it all welters as we see! But the beginning of it was not the French Revolution; that is rather the end, we can hope. It were truer to say, the beginning was three centuries farther back: in the Reformation of Luther. That the thing which still called itself Christian Church had become a Falsehood, and brazenly went about pretending to pardon men’s sins for metallic coined money, and to do much else which in the everlasting truth of Nature it did not now do: here lay the vital malady. The inward being wrong, all outward went ever more and more wrong. Belief died away; all was Doubt, Disbelief. The builder 426cast away his plummet; said to himself, “What is gravitation? Brick lies on brick there!” Alas, does it not still sound strange to many of us, the assertion that there is a God’s truth in the business of god-created men; that all is not a kind of grimace, an ‘expediency,’ diplomacy, one knows not what!—
Certainly, it’s a scary thing to have to search for your Ableman without knowing how to go about it! That’s the sad situation we find ourselves in these days. These are revolutionary times, and they have been for a long time. The bricklayer, ignoring the plumb line and the law of gravity, has caused everything to collapse and crumble, and it’s a chaotic mess as we can see! But the start of this was not the French Revolution; that’s more like the end, or at least we hope it is. It would be more accurate to say that the real beginning was three centuries earlier: during Luther’s Reformation. The institution that still called itself the Christian Church had turned into a Falsehood, shamelessly pretending to forgive people’s sins for money and doing many other things that, according to the eternal truths of Nature, it wasn’t actually doing: that was the core issue. With the inner self being wrong, everything outward spiraled further into chaos. Faith faded away; only doubt and disbelief remained. The builder tossed aside his plumb line and thought to himself, “What is gravity? Brick just sits on brick!” Sadly, doesn’t it still sound strange to many of us, the idea that there’s a divine truth in the lives of God-created men; that everything isn’t just a facade, a matter of ‘expediency,’ or diplomacy, or who knows what!—
From that first necessary assertion of Luther’s, “You, self-styled Papa, you are no Father in God at all; you are—a Chimera, whom I know not how to name in polite language!”—from that onwards to the shout which rose round Camille Desmoulins in the Palais-Royal, “Aux armes!” when the people had burst-up against all manner of Chimeras,—I find a natural historical sequence. That shout too, so frightful, half-infernal, was a great matter. Once more the voice of awakened nations; starting confusedly, as out of nightmare, as out of death-sleep, into some dim feeling that Life was real; that God’s-world was not an expediency and diplomacy! Infernal;—yes, since they would not have it otherwise. Infernal, since not celestial or terrestrial!—Hollowness, insincerity has to cease;—sincerity of some sort has to begin. Cost what it may, reigns of terror, horrors of French Revolution or what else, we have to return to truth. Here is a Truth, as I said: a Truth clad in hell-fire, since they would not but have it so!—
From that first necessary declaration by Luther, “You, self-proclaimed Papa, you are not a Father in God at all; you are—a Chimera, whom I don’t know how to refer to politely!”—to the shout that erupted around Camille Desmoulins in the Palais-Royal, “Aux armes!” when the people rose up against all types of Chimeras,—I see a clear historical progression. That shout, terrifying and half-infernal, was significant. Once again, it was the voice of awakened nations; stirring confusedly, as if from a nightmare, as if from death-sleep, into a vague realization that Life was real; that God's world was not just about expediency and diplomacy! Infernal;—yes, since they refused to have it any other way. Infernal, because it was neither celestial nor terrestrial!—Hollowness, insincerity must end;—some form of sincerity must begin. No matter the cost, whether it’s reigns of terror, the horrors of the French Revolution or anything else, we must return to the truth. Here is a Truth, as I mentioned: a Truth wrapped in hell-fire, since they wouldn’t have it any other way!—
A common theory among considerable parties of men in England and elsewhere used to be, that the French Nation had, in those days, as it were gone mad; that the French Revolution was a general act of insanity, a temporary conversion of France and large sections of the world into a kind of Bedlam. The Event had risen and raged; but was a madness and nonentity,—gone now happily into the region of Dreams and the Picturesque!—To such comfortable philosophers, the Three Days of July 1830 must have been a surprising phenomenon. Here is the French Nation risen again, in musketry and death-struggle, out shooting and being shot, to make that same mad French Revolution good! The sons and grandsons of those men, it would seem, persist in the enterprise: they do not disown it; they will have it made good; will have themselves shot, if 427it be not made good! To philosophers who had made-up their life-system on that ‘madness’ quietus, no phenomenon could be more alarming. Poor Niebuhr, they say, the Prussian Professor and Historian, fell broken-hearted in consequence; sickened, if we can believe it, and died of the Three Days! It was surely not a very heroic death;—little better than Racine’s, dying because Louis Fourteenth looked sternly on him once. The world had stood some considerable shocks, in its time; might have been expected to survive the Three Days too, and be found turning on its axis after even them! The Three Days told all mortals that the old French Revolution, mad as it might look, was not a transitory ebullition of Bedlam, but a genuine product of this Earth where we all live; that it was verily a Fact, and that the world in general would do well everywhere to regard it as such.
A common belief among many people in England and beyond used to be that the French Nation, back then, had gone a bit nuts; that the French Revolution was a widespread act of insanity, a temporary turning of France and large parts of the world into a kind of madhouse. The Event had erupted and intensified, but it was just madness and nothingness—thankfully now faded into the realm of dreams and the picturesque! For those comfortable thinkers, the Three Days of July 1830 must have been a shocking surprise. Here was the French Nation rising once again, in battle and chaos, shooting and being shot, trying to validate that same crazy French Revolution! The sons and grandsons of those men, it seems, are still committed to the cause: they don’t reject it; they want it to succeed; they're ready to be shot if it doesn’t! For the philosophers who had based their life views on that “madness” being over, nothing could be more alarming. Poor Niebuhr, the Prussian Professor and Historian, it is said, was heartbroken as a result; he fell ill, if we are to believe it, and died because of the Three Days! It surely wasn’t a very heroic death—little better than Racine's, who died because Louis XIV looked sternly at him once. The world had endured many significant shocks over time; it should have been expected to survive the Three Days too, and still be found spinning on its axis afterward! The Three Days told everyone that the old French Revolution, as crazy as it may seem, was not a fleeting outburst of madness but a real product of this Earth we all inhabit; that it was indeed a fact, and that the world at large should recognize it as such.
Truly, without the French Revolution, one would not know what to make of an age like this at all. We will hail the French Revolution, as shipwrecked mariners might the sternest rock, in a world otherwise all of baseless sea and waves. A true Apocalypse, though a terrible one, to this false withered artificial time; testifying once more that Nature is preternatural; if not divine, then diabolic; that Semblance is not reality; that it has to become reality, or the world will take-fire under it,—burn it into what it is, namely Nothing! Plausibility has ended; empty Routine has ended; much has ended. This, as with a Trump of Doom, has been proclaimed to all men. They are the wisest who will learn it soonest. Long confused generations before it be learned; peace impossible till it be! The earnest man, surrounded, as ever, with a world of inconsistencies, can await patiently, patiently strive to do his work, in the midst of that. Sentence of Death is written down in Heaven against all that; sentence of Death is now proclaimed on the Earth against it: this he with his eyes may see. And surely, I should say, considering the other side of the matter, what enormous difficulties lie there, and how fast, fearfully fast, in all countries, the inexorable demand for solution of them is pressing on,—he may easily find other 428work to do than labouring in the Sansculottic province at this time of day!
Honestly, without the French Revolution, it would be hard to make sense of an age like this at all. We will celebrate the French Revolution like shipwrecked sailors might cling to the hardest rock in a world that's otherwise just a featureless sea and waves. A true Apocalypse, though a terrible one, to this false, withered, artificial time; showing once again that Nature is preternatural; if not divine, then demonic; that appearance is not reality; it must become reality, or the world will catch fire beneath it—burn it into what it truly is, which is Nothing! Plausibility has come to an end; empty Routine has ended; a lot has ended. This, like a Trumpet of Doom, has been announced to all people. The wisest are those who will understand it the quickest. Long confused generations will suffer until they do! The earnest person, surrounded, as always, by a world of inconsistencies, can wait patiently, and strive to do his work amid that. A Sentence of Death is written in Heaven against all that; a Sentence of Death is now declared on Earth against it: he can see this with his own eyes. And truly, I must say, considering the other side of the situation, what enormous difficulties lie ahead, and how quickly, fearfully quickly, in all countries, the relentless demand for their resolution is pressing on—he may easily find other 428work to do than laboring in the Sansculottic province at this time of day!
To me, in these circumstances, that of ‘Hero-worship’ becomes a fact inexpressibly precious; the most solacing fact one sees in the world at present. There is an everlasting hope in it for the management of the world. Had all traditions, arrangements, creeds, societies that men ever instituted, sunk away, this would remain. The certainty of Heroes being sent us; our faculty, our necessity, to reverence Heroes when sent: it shines like a polestar through smoke-clouds, dust-clouds, and all manner of down-rushing and conflagration.
To me, in these circumstances, the idea of 'Hero-worship' becomes something incredibly valuable; it's the most comforting truth we have in the world today. It holds an everlasting hope for managing the world. Even if all traditions, arrangements, beliefs, and societies created by people were to disappear, this would still remain. The assurance that Heroes are sent to us; our ability and need to honor these Heroes when they arrive: it shines like a guiding star through smoke, dust, and all kinds of chaos and destruction.
Hero-worship would have sounded very strange to those workers and fighters in the French Revolution. Not reverence for Great Men; not any hope or belief, or even wish, that Great Men could again appear in the world! Nature, turned into a ‘Machine,’ was as if effete now; could not any longer produce Great Men:—I can tell her, she may give-up the trade altogether, then; we cannot do without Great Men!—But neither have I any quarrel with that of ‘Liberty and Equality;’ with the faith that, wise great men being impossible, a level immensity of foolish small men would suffice. It was a natural faith then and there. “Liberty and Equality; no Authority needed any longer. Hero-worship, reverence for such Authorities, has proved false, is itself a falsehood; no more of it! We have had such forgeries, we will now trust nothing. So many base plated coins passing in the market, the belief has now become common that no gold any longer exists,—and even that we can do very well without gold!” I find this, among other things, in that universal cry of Liberty and Equality; and find it very natural, as matters then stood.
Hero-worship would have sounded really strange to those workers and fighters during the French Revolution. There was no reverence for Great Men; no hope or belief, or even wish, that Great Men could show up in the world again! Nature, turned into a ‘Machine,’ seemed ineffective now; it couldn’t produce Great Men anymore:—I can tell her she might as well give up on that, because we can’t do without Great Men!—But I don’t have any issue with the idea of ‘Liberty and Equality;’ the belief that, since wise great men are impossible, a vast number of ordinary small men would be enough. It felt like a natural belief at that time. “Liberty and Equality; no Authority needed anymore. Hero-worship, respect for such Authorities, has proven false, is itself a falsehood; no more of it! We’ve had such forgeries, and we’ll now trust nothing. With so many counterfeit coins circulating in the market, the common belief has now become that no real gold exists,—and even that we can manage quite well without gold!” I see this, among other things, in that universal cry for Liberty and Equality; and I find it very natural, given how things were at that time.
And yet surely it is but the transition from false to true. Considered as the whole truth, it is false altogether;—the product of entire sceptical blindness, as yet only struggling to see. Hero-worship exists forever, and everywhere: not Loyalty alone; it extends from divine adoration down to the lowest practical regions of life. ‘Bending before men,’ if it is not to 429be a mere empty grimace, better dispensed with than practised, is Hero-worship,—a recognition that there does dwell in that presence of our brother something divine; that every created man, as Novalis said, is a ‘revelation in the Flesh.’ They were Poets too, that devised all those graceful courtesies which make life noble! Courtesy is not a falsehood or grimace; it need not be such. And Loyalty, religious Worship itself, are still possible; nay still inevitable.
And yet surely it is just the transition from false to true. Seen as the complete truth, it’s entirely false; it’s the result of total skeptical blindness, yet still only struggling to see. Hero-worship exists forever and everywhere: not just Loyalty; it extends from divine adoration down to the very basic aspects of life. 'Bending before men,' if it’s not just an empty show, is better not done than practiced, is Hero-worship—a recognition that something divine resides in our fellow humans; that every created person, as Novalis said, is a ‘revelation in the Flesh.’ They were Poets too, who crafted all those graceful gestures that make life noble! Courtesy is not a falsehood or a pretense; it doesn’t have to be. And Loyalty, religious Worship itself, is still possible; in fact, it’s still inevitable.
May we not say, moreover, while so many of our late Heroes have worked rather as revolutionary men, that nevertheless every Great Man, every genuine man, is by the nature of him a son of Order, not of Disorder? It is a tragical position for a true man to work in revolutions. He seems an anarchist; and indeed a painful element of anarchy does encumber him at every step,—him to whose whole soul anarchy is hostile, hateful. His mission is Order; every man’s is. He is here to make what was disorderly, chaotic, into a thing ruled, regular. He is the missionary of Order. Is not all work of man in this world a making of Order? The carpenter finds rough trees: shapes them, constrains them into square fitness, into purpose and use. We are all born enemies of Disorder: it is tragical for us all to be concerned in image-breaking and down-pulling; for the Great Man, more a man than we, it is doubly tragical.
Can we not say, too, that while so many of our recent heroes have acted as revolutionaries, every great person, every true individual, is inherently a child of Order, not Disorder? It’s a tragic situation for a genuine person to be involved in revolutions. They appear to be anarchists; and indeed, a painful sense of anarchy weighs them down at every turn—someone whose entire being is opposed to, and hates, anarchy. Their mission is Order; everyone’s is. They are here to transform what is chaotic and disordered into something structured and regular. They are the advocates of Order. Isn’t all human work in this world about creating Order? The carpenter starts with rough trees: he shapes them, molds them into square fit, into purpose and utility. We are all born adversaries of Disorder: it’s tragic for all of us to be involved in breaking down and tearing apart; for the Great Man, more a person than we, it’s doubly tragic.
Thus too all human things, maddest French Sansculottisms, do and must work towards Order. I say, there is not a man in them, raging in the thickest of the madness, but is impelled withal, at all moments, towards Order. His very life means that; Disorder is dissolution, death. No chaos but it seeks a centre to revolve round. While man is man, some Cromwell or Napoleon is the necessary finish of a Sansculottism.—Curious: in those days when Hero-worship was the most incredible thing to every one, how it does come-out nevertheless, and assert itself practically, in a way which all have to credit. Divine right, take it on the great scale, is found to mean divine might withal! While old false Formulas are getting trampled everywhere into destruction, new genuine Substances unexpectedly 430unfold themselves indestructible. In rebellious ages, when Kingship itself seems dead and abolished, Cromwell, Napoleon step-forth again as Kings. The history of these men is what we have now to look at, as our last phasis of Heroism. The old ages are brought back to us; the manner in which Kings were made, and Kingship itself first took rise, is again exhibited in the history of these Two.
Thus too, all human things, the wildest French Sansculottism, do and must work towards Order. I say, there isn't a man among them, caught in the madness, who isn't driven, at every moment, towards Order. His very existence implies that; Disorder is disintegration, death. No chaos exists that doesn’t seek a centre to revolve around. As long as man is man, some Cromwell or Napoleon is the inevitable outcome of a Sansculottism. — Interestingly, in those times when Hero-worship seemed unbelievable to everyone, it still managed to make itself known practically, in a way that everyone had to acknowledge. Divine right, on a grand scale, turns out to mean divine might as well! While old false Formulas are being trampled into destruction everywhere, new genuine Substances unexpectedly unfold, indestructible. In rebellious times, when Kingship itself seems dead and abolished, Cromwell and Napoleon step forward again as Kings. The history of these men is what we need to examine now, as our last phase of Heroism. The old ages return to us; the way Kings were made, and how Kingship itself first arose, is once again demonstrated in the history of these Two.
We have had many civil-wars in England; wars of Red and White Roses, wars of Simon de Montfort; wars enough, which are not very memorable. But that war of the Puritans has a significance which belongs to no one of the others. Trusting to your candour, which will suggest on the other side what I have not room to say, I will call it a section once more of that great universal war which alone makes-up the true History of the World,—the war of Belief against Unbelief! The struggle of men intent on the real essence of things, against men intent on the semblances and forms of things. The Puritans, to many, seem mere savage Iconoclasts, fierce destroyers of Forms; but it were more just to call them haters of untrue Forms. I hope we know how to respect Laud and his King as well as them. Poor Laud seems to me to have been weak and ill-starred, not dishonest; an unfortunate Pedant rather than anything worse. His ‘Dreams’ and superstitions, at which they laugh so, have an affectionate, lovable kind of character. He is like a College-Tutor, whose whole world is forms, College-rules; whose notion is that these are the life and safety of the world. He is placed suddenly, with that unalterable luckless notion of his, at the head not of a College but of a Nation, to regulate the most complex deep-reaching interests of men. He thinks they ought to go by the old decent regulations; nay that their salvation will lie in extending and improving these. Like a weak man, he drives with spasmodic vehemence towards his purpose; cramps himself to it, heeding no voice of prudence, no cry of pity: He will have his College-rules obeyed by his Collegians; that first; and till that, nothing. He is an ill-starred Pedant, as I said. He 431would have it the world was a College of that kind, and the world was not that. Alas, was not his doom stern enough? Whatever wrongs he did, were they not all frightfully avenged on him?
We’ve had many civil wars in England—wars over the Red and White Roses, wars of Simon de Montfort; enough wars that aren’t really memorable. But the war of the Puritans has a significance that none of the others have. Trusting in your understanding, which will point out what I can’t fully express here, I’ll call it once again a part of that great universal conflict that truly makes up the History of the World—the war between Belief and Unbelief! It’s the struggle between people focused on the true essence of things and those fixated on appearances and forms. To many, the Puritans seem like mere savage iconoclasts, fierce destroyers of Forms; but it’s more accurate to describe them as haters of fake Forms. I hope we can respect Laud and his King just as we do them. Poor Laud seems to have been weak and unlucky, not dishonest; more of an unfortunate Pedant than anything else. His 'Dreams' and superstitions, which they laugh at, have a kind of affectionate charm. He’s like a College Tutor, whose entire world revolves around forms and College rules; who believes these are the life and safety of the world. Suddenly, with his unyielding and unfortunate beliefs, he finds himself leading not a College but a Nation, tasked with regulating the most complex and deep issues of people’s lives. He thinks they should follow the old decent regulations; in fact, he believes their salvation lies in extending and improving these. Like a weak man, he pushes forward with fits of intensity toward his goal; he limits himself to it, ignoring all voices of reason, all cries of compassion: He insists his College rules be followed by his students; that comes first, and until then, nothing else matters. He is, as I said, a poorly-fated Pedant. He would have thought the world was a College of that nature, and the world was not that. Alas, wasn’t his fate harsh enough? Whatever wrongs he committed, were they not all dreadfully avenged upon him?
It is meritorious to insist on forms; Religion and all else naturally clothes itself in forms. Everywhere the formed world is the only habitable one. The naked formlessness of Puritanism is not the thing I praise in the Puritans; it is the thing I pity,—praising only the spirit which had rendered that inevitable! All substances clothe themselves in forms: but there are suitable true forms, and then there are untrue unsuitable. As the briefest definition, one might say, Forms which grow round a substance, if we rightly understand that, will correspond to the real nature and purport of it, will be true, good; forms which are consciously put round a substance, bad. I invite you to reflect on this. It distinguishes true from false in Ceremonial Form, earnest solemnity from empty pageant, in all human things.
It’s commendable to focus on forms; religion and everything else naturally takes shape. The structured world is the only one we can really inhabit. The raw formlessness of Puritanism isn’t something I admire in the Puritans; it’s something I feel sorry for—only praising the spirit that made that unavoidable! All substances take shape, but some forms are suitable and true, while others are false and inappropriate. In the simplest terms, we might say that forms which grow around a substance, if we truly understand that, will match its real nature and purpose, and will be true and good; forms that are consciously put around a substance are bad. I encourage you to think about this. It helps to distinguish true from false in ceremonial form, genuine solemnity from shallow spectacle, in all human endeavors.
There must be a veracity, a natural spontaneity in forms. In the commonest meeting of men, a person making, what we call, ‘set speeches,’ is not he an offence? In the mere drawing-room, whatsoever courtesies you see to be grimaces, prompted by no spontaneous reality within, are a thing you wish to get away from. But suppose now it were some matter of vital concernment, some transcendent matter (as Divine Worship is), about which your whole soul, struck dumb with its excess of feeling, knew not how to form itself into utterance at all, and preferred formless silence to any utterance there possible,—what should we say of a man coming forward to represent or utter it for you in the way of upholsterer-mummery? Such a man,—let him depart swiftly, if he love himself! You have lost your only son; are mute, struck down, without even tears: an importunate man importunately offers to celebrate Funeral Games for him in the manner of the Greeks! Such mummery is not only not to be accepted,—it is hateful, unendurable. It is what the old Prophets called ‘Idolatry,’ worshipping of hollow shows; what all earnest men do and will reject. We 432can partly understand what those poor Puritans meant. Laud dedicating that St. Catherine Creed’s Church, in the manner we have it described; with his multiplied ceremonial bowings, gesticulations, exclamations: surely it is rather the rigorous formal Pedant, intent on his ‘College-rules,’ than the earnest Prophet, intent on the essence of the matter!
There needs to be honesty and a natural spontaneity in forms. In the most ordinary gatherings of people, when someone delivers what we call ‘set speeches,’ isn’t that offensive? In the simple drawing-room, the polite gestures that you can tell are just fake and not coming from genuine feelings are something you want to escape. But imagine if it were about something truly important, something profound (like Divine Worship), where your whole soul, overwhelmed with too much emotion, didn’t know how to express itself at all and would rather remain silent than say anything—what should we think of someone stepping in to represent or voice it for you in a theatrical way? That person—let him leave quickly if he values himself! You have lost your only son; you’re speechless, crushed, without even tears: a persistent person insistently offers to hold Funeral Games for him just like the Greeks! That kind of pretense is not only unacceptable—it’s detestable and unbearable. It’s what the old Prophets called ‘Idolatry,’ worship of empty shows; which all sincere people reject and will continue to reject. We can somewhat understand what those poor Puritans meant. Laud dedicating that St. Catherine Creed’s Church, in the way it has been described; with his countless ceremonial bows, gestures, and exclamations: it surely shows more of a strict formal Pedant, focused on his ‘College rules,’ rather than an earnest Prophet, focused on the essence of the matter!
Puritanism found such forms insupportable; trampled on such forms;—we have to excuse it for saying, No form at all rather than such! It stood preaching in its bare pulpit, with nothing but the Bible in its hand. Nay, a man preaching from his earnest soul into the earnest souls of men: is not this virtually the essence of all Churches whatsoever? The nakedest, savagest reality, I say, is preferable to any semblance, however dignified. Besides, it will clothe itself with due semblance by and by, if it be real. No fear of that; actually no fear at all. Given the living man, there will be found clothes for him; he will find himself clothes. But the suit-of-clothes pretending that it is both clothes and man—!—We cannot ‘fight the French’ by three-hundred-thousand red uniforms; there must be men in the inside of them! Semblance, I assert, must actually not divorce itself from Reality. If Semblance do,—why then there must be men found to rebel against Semblance, for it has become a lie! These two Antagonisms at war here, in the case of Laud and the Puritans, are as old nearly as the world. They went to fierce battle over England in that age; and fought-out their confused controversy to a certain length, with many results for all of us.
Puritanism found these forms unacceptable; it rejected them;—we can understand it saying, No form at all is better than this! It stood preaching in its bare pulpit, holding nothing but the Bible. A man preaching from his genuine soul into the genuine souls of others: isn’t this really the core of all Churches? The rawest, most authentic reality, I say, is better than any appearance, no matter how dignified. Besides, if it’s real, it will eventually gain the right appearance on its own. There’s no need to worry about that—actually, no need at all. With a living man, there will be clothes for him; he will find clothes for himself. But a suit of clothes pretending to be both clothes and a man—! We can’t “fight the French” just by having three-hundred-thousand red uniforms; there must be men inside them! I assert that appearance must not separate itself from reality. If appearance does—then there must be men to rebel against it, for it has become a lie! These two opposing forces at war here, in the case of Laud and the Puritans, are almost as old as the world itself. They engaged in fierce battles over England in that era, fighting their complicated controversy to a certain extent, with many outcomes for all of us.
In the age which directly followed that of the Puritans, their cause or themselves were little likely to have justice done them. Charles Second and his Rochesters were not the kind of men you would set to judge what the worth or meaning of such men might have been. That there could be any faith or truth in the life of a man, was what these poor Rochesters, and the age they ushered-in, had forgotten. Puritanism was hung on gibbets,—like the bones of the leading Puritans. Its work nevertheless went on accomplishing itself. All 433true work of a man, hang the author of it on what gibbet you like, must and will accomplish itself. We have our Habeas-Corpus, our free Representation of the People; acknowledgment, wide as the world, that all men are, or else must, shall, and will become, what we call free men;—men with their life grounded on reality and justice, not on tradition, which has become unjust and a chimera! This in part and much besides this, was the work of the Puritans.
In the period that came right after the Puritans, it was unlikely that their cause or themselves would be treated fairly. Charles II and his companions weren't the type of people you would trust to assess the value or significance of such individuals. The idea that there could be any genuine faith or truth in a man's life was something these misguided folks, along with the era they ushered in, had forgotten. Puritanism was put to death—just like the bodies of the leading Puritans. Yet, its influence continued to unfold. All true work of a person, no matter how you choose to disregard the author, inevitably achieves its purpose. We have our Habeas Corpus, our free Representation of the People; a global recognition that all people are, or will eventually become, what we call free individuals—people whose lives are grounded in reality and justice, not in traditions that have become unjust and illusory! This, along with much more, was the achievement of the Puritans.
And indeed, as these things became gradually manifest, the character of the Puritans began to clear itself. Their memories were, one after another, taken down from the gibbet; nay a certain portion of them are now, in these days, as good as canonised. Eliot, Hampden, Pym, nay Ludlow, Hutchinson, Vane himself, are admitted to be a kind of Heroes; political Conscript Fathers, to whom in no small degree we owe what makes us a free England: it would not be safe for anybody to designate these men as wicked now. Few Puritans of note but find their apologists somewhere, and have a certain reverence paid them by earnest men. One Puritan, I think, and almost he alone, our poor Cromwell, seems to hang yet on the gibbet, and find no hearty apologist anywhere. Him neither saint nor sinner will acquit of great wickedness. A man of ability, infinite talent, courage, and so forth: but he betrayed the Cause. Selfish ambition, dishonesty, duplicity; a fierce, coarse, hypocritical Tartufe; turning all that noble Struggle for constitutional Liberty into a sorry farce played for his own benefit: this and worse is the character they give of Cromwell. And then there come contrasts with Washington and others; above all, with these noble Pyms and Hampdens, whose noble work he stole for himself, and ruined into a futility and deformity.
And indeed, as these things gradually became clear, the identity of the Puritans started to come into focus. Their memories have been, one by one, taken down from the gallows; in fact, some of them are now, in these days, practically canonized. Eliot, Hampden, Pym, and even Ludlow, Hutchinson, and Vane himself are acknowledged as kind of heroes; political founding fathers, to whom we largely owe what makes us a free England: it wouldn’t be safe for anyone to label these men as evil now. Few notable Puritans lack defenders, and many earnest people hold them in some reverence. One Puritan, I think, who is almost alone in this regard is our poor Cromwell; he seems to still hang on the gallows and has no genuine supporter anywhere. Neither saint nor sinner can absolve him of great wrongdoing. A man of ability, immense talent, courage, and so on: but he betrayed the Cause. Selfish ambition, dishonesty, duplicity; a fierce, crude, hypocritical Tartufe; turning that noble struggle for constitutional liberty into a sad joke played for his own benefit: this and worse is the reputation they give to Cromwell. And then there are comparisons to Washington and others; especially with these noble Pym and Hampden, whose honorable work he appropriated for himself and ruined into something futile and grotesque.
This view of Cromwell seems to me the not unnatural product of a century like the Eighteenth. As we said of the Valet, so of the Sceptic: He does not know a Hero when he sees him! The Valet expected purple mantles, gilt sceptres, body-guards and flourishes of trumpets: the Sceptic of the Eighteenth century looks for regulated respectable Formulas, ‘Principles,’ or what else he 434may call them; a style of speech and conduct which has got to seem ‘respectable,’ which can plead for itself in a handsome articulate manner, and gain the suffrages of an enlightened sceptical Eighteenth century! It is, at bottom, the same thing that both the Valet and he expect: the garnitures of some acknowledged royalty, which then they will acknowledge! The King coming to them in the rugged unformulistic state shall be no King.
This view of Cromwell seems to me to be a natural outcome of a century like the Eighteenth. Just as we said about the Valet, the Sceptic is the same: he doesn’t recognize a Hero when he sees one! The Valet expected ornate robes, golden scepters, bodyguards, and trumpets: the Sceptic of the Eighteenth century looks for structured, respectable formulas, ‘Principles,’ or whatever else he might call them; a style of speech and behavior that has to seem ‘respectable,’ which can make a strong case for itself in a polished and articulate way, and earn the favor of an enlightened, skeptical Eighteenth century! At its core, it’s the same thing both the Valet and he expect: the trappings of some acknowledged royalty, which then they will recognize! The King approaching them in a rough, unformulated state will not be seen as a King.
For my own share, far be it from me to say or insinuate a word of disparagement against such characters as Hampden, Eliot, Pym; whom I believe to have been right worthy and useful men. I have read diligently what books and documents about them I could come at;—with the honestest wish to admire, to love and worship them like Heroes; but I am sorry to say, if the real truth must be told, with very indifferent success! At bottom, I found that it would not do. They are very noble men, these; step along in their stately way, with their measured euphemisms, philosophies, parliamentary eloquences, Ship-moneys, Monarchies of Man; a most constitutional, unblamable, dignified set of men. But the heart remains cold before them; the fancy alone endeavours to get-up some worship of them. What man’s heart does, in reality, break-forth into any fire of brotherly love for these men? They are become dreadfully dull men! One breaks-down often enough in the constitutional eloquence of the admirable Pym, with his ‘seventhly and lastly.’ You find that it may be the admirablest thing in the world, but that it is heavy,—heavy as lead, barren as brick-clay; that, in a word, for you there is little or nothing now surviving there! One leaves all these Nobilities standing in their niches of honour: the rugged out-cast Cromwell, he is the man of them all in whom one still finds human stuff. The great savage Baresark: he could write no euphemistic Monarchy of Man; did not speak, did not work with glib regularity; had no straight story to tell for himself anywhere. But he stood bare, not cased in euphemistic coat-of-mail; he grappled like a giant, face to face, heart to heart, with the naked truth of things! That, after all, is the sort of man for one. I plead 435guilty to valuing such a man beyond all other sorts of men. Smooth-shaven Respectabilities not a few one finds, that are not good for much. Small thanks to a man for keeping his hands clean, who would not touch the work but with gloves on!
For my part, I certainly don’t want to say anything negative about people like Hampden, Eliot, or Pym; I sincerely believe they were good and useful individuals. I’ve read everything I could find about them, with a genuine desire to admire and even worship them as heroes. Unfortunately, if I’m being completely honest, I haven’t had much success! Ultimately, I found that it just isn’t meant to be. They are truly noble men, moving along in their dignified manner, with their carefully chosen words, philosophies, and parliamentary speeches, a very proper and respectable group of men. But honestly, there’s no real warmth toward them; it’s just imagination trying to create some form of admiration. What person genuinely feels a surge of brotherly love for these figures? They’ve become painfully dull! You can get bogged down in the constitutional eloquence of the admirable Pym, with his ‘seventhly and lastly.’ You realize that even though it might be the most impressive thing ever, it’s also so heavy—sturdy as lead, as uninspiring as brick clay; in short, there’s little left that truly resonates! You leave these noble figures standing in their honored places: rugged outcast Cromwell is the one who still has a human touch. The great savage Baresark: he couldn’t write a polished ‘Monarchy of Man’; he didn't speak or act with smooth regularity and had no straightforward tale to tell. But he stood bare, not armored in elegant phrases; he faced the raw truth of things like a giant, heart to heart! That, after all, is the kind of person I value most. I admit to valuing such a person above all others. There are plenty of smoothly polished respectable types who aren’t worth much. It doesn’t earn a man much respect to keep his hands clean if he won’t even touch the work without gloves!
Neither, on the whole, does this constitutional tolerance of the Eighteenth century for the other happier Puritans seem to be a very great matter. One might say, it is but a piece of Formulism and Scepticism, like the rest. They tell us, It was a sorrowful thing to consider that the foundation of our English Liberties should have been laid by ‘Superstition.’ These Puritans came forward with Calvinistic incredible Creeds, Anti-Laudisms, Westminster Confessions; demanding, chiefly of all, that they should have liberty to worship in their own way. Liberty to tax themselves: that was the thing they should have demanded! It was Superstition, Fanaticism, disgraceful Ignorance of Constitutional Philosophy to insist on the other thing!—Liberty to tax oneself? Not to pay-out money from your pocket except on reason shown? No century, I think, but a rather barren one would have fixed on that as the first right of man! I should say, on the contrary, A just man will generally have better cause than money in what shape soever, before deciding to revolt against his Government. Ours is a most confused world; in which a good man will be thankful to see any kind of Government maintain itself in a not insupportable manner; and here in England, to this hour, if he is not ready to pay a great many taxes which he can see very small reason in, it will not go well with him, I think! He must try some other climate than this. Taxgatherer? Money? He will say: “Take my money, since you can, and it is so desirable to you; take it,—and take yourself away with it; and leave me alone to my work here. I am still here; can still work, after all the money you have taken from me!” But if they come to him, and say, “Acknowledge a Lie; pretend to say you are worshipping God, when you are not doing it: believe not the thing that you find true, but the thing that I find, or pretend to find true!” He will answer: “No; by God’s help, no! You may take my purse; but I cannot have my 436moral Self annihilated. The purse is any Highwayman’s who might meet me with a loaded pistol: but the Self is mine and God my Maker’s; it is not yours; and I will resist you to the death, and revolt against you, and, on the whole, front all manner of extremities, accusations and confusions, in defence of that!”—
Neither does this constitutional tolerance from the Eighteenth century for the other happier Puritans seem very significant overall. One might say it’s just a form of superficial thought and skepticism, like everything else. They tell us it’s unfortunate to think that the foundation of our English liberties was laid by ‘superstition.’ These Puritans came forward with their Calvinistic beliefs, anti-Laudism, and Westminster Confessions, mainly demanding the right to worship in their own way. The real thing they should have demanded was the liberty to tax themselves! Insisting on the other stuff was superstitious, fanatical, and showed a disgraceful ignorance of constitutional philosophy!—Liberty to tax oneself? Not paying out money from your pocket unless there's a good reason? I think only a rather barren century would have chosen that as the first right of man! In fact, I would say a just person usually has a better reason than money in any form before deciding to revolt against their government. Our world is quite confusing, where a good person will be grateful to see any form of government maintain itself in a bearable way; and here in England, even today, if he’s not willing to pay a lot of taxes he sees little reason for, it won’t go well for him, I believe! He must try another place. Tax collector? Money? He would say: “Take my money, since you can and it’s so important to you; take it—and take yourself away with it; and leave me to my work here. I am still here; I can still work, no matter how much money you’ve taken from me!” But if they approach him and say, “Acknowledge a lie; pretend you’re worshipping God when you’re not: believe not what you find true, but what I claim, or pretend to claim, is true!” He will respond: “No, with God’s help, no! You may take my wallet; but I cannot allow my 436moral self to be destroyed. The wallet could belong to any highway robber who might hold a loaded gun against me: but the self belongs to me and to God my Maker; it’s not yours; and I will resist you to the death, and revolt against you, and face all sorts of extremes, accusations, and confusions in defense of that!”
Really, it seems to me the one reason which could justify revolting, this of the Puritans. It has been the soul of all just revolts among men. Not Hunger alone produced even the French Revolution: no, but the feeling of the insupportable all-pervading Falsehood which had now embodied itself in Hunger, in universal material Scarcity and Nonentity, and thereby become indisputably false in the eyes of all! We will leave the Eighteenth century with its ‘liberty to tax itself.’ We will not astonish ourselves that the meaning of such men as the Puritans remained dim to it. To men who believe in no reality at all, how shall a real human soul, the intensest of all realities, as it were the Voice of this world’s Maker still speaking to us,—be intelligible? What it cannot reduce into constitutional doctrines relative to ‘taxing,’ or other the like material interest, gross, palpable to the sense, such a century will needs reject as an amorphous heap of rubbish. Hampdens, Pyms, and Ship-money will be the theme of much constitutional eloquence, striving to be fervid;—which will glitter, if not as fire does, then as ice does: and the irreducible Cromwell will remain a chaotic mass of ‘madness,’ ‘hypocrisy,’ and much else.
Honestly, it seems to me that the only reason that could justify revolting is this one from the Puritans. It's been the essence of all legitimate uprisings among people. It wasn't just Hunger that sparked the French Revolution; it was the sense of an unbearable, all-encompassing Falsehood that had taken the shape of Hunger, universal material Scarcity, and Nonentity, which became indisputably false in everyone's eyes! Let's move on from the Eighteenth century with its ‘liberty to tax itself.’ We shouldn't be shocked that the purpose of people like the Puritans seemed unclear to them. For those who don't believe in any real truth, how can a real human soul— the most intense of all realities, almost like the Voice of the world's Creator still speaking to us—be understood? What they can't break down into constitutional doctrines related to ‘taxing’ or some other material interests, obvious and tangible to the senses, such a century will dismiss as a shapeless pile of rubbish. Hampdens, Pyms, and Ship-money will be extensively discussed in constitutional speeches, trying to seem passionate;—which will shine, if not like fire, then like ice: and the complex Cromwell will remain an incomprehensible blend of ‘madness,’ ‘hypocrisy,’ and much more.
From of old, I will confess, this theory of Cromwell’s falsity has been incredible to me. Nay I cannot believe the like, of any Great Man whatever. Multitudes of Great Men figure in History as false selfish men; but if we will consider it, they are but figures for us, unintelligible shadows; we do not see into them as men that could have existed at all. A superficial unbelieving generation only, with no eye but for the surfaces and semblances of things, could form such notions of Great Men. Can a great soul be possible without a conscience in it, the essence of all real souls, great or small?—No, we cannot figure Cromwell as a Falsity and Fatuity; 437the longer I study him and his career, I believe this the less. Why should we? There is no evidence of it. Is it not strange that, after all the mountains of calumny this man has been subject to, after being represented as the very prince of liars, who never, or hardly ever, spoke truth, but always some cunning counterfeit of truth, there should not yet have been one falsehood brought clearly home to him? A prince of liars, and no lie spoken by him. Not one that I could yet get sight of. It is like Pococke asking Grotius, Where is your proof of Mahomet’s Pigeon? No proof!—Let us leave all these calumnious chimeras, as chimeras ought to be left. They are not portraits of the man; they are distracted phantasms of him, the joint product of hatred and darkness.
Honestly, I've always found the idea that Cromwell was a fraud to be unbelievable. I can’t accept it about any Great Man. Many Great Men in history are portrayed as false and selfish, but if we really think about it, they’re just figures to us, confusing shadows; we don’t truly see them as real people who existed. Only a shallow, skeptical generation that only looks at the surface of things could come up with such ideas about Great Men. Can a truly great soul exist without a conscience, which is the essence of all true souls, big or small?—No, we can’t imagine Cromwell as a falsehood or a fool; 437 the more I study him and his life, the less I believe that. Why should we? There’s no evidence for it. Isn’t it odd that, despite all the slander this man has faced, being labeled as the ultimate liar who never or rarely spoke the truth, there hasn’t been a single clear falsehood directly tied to him? A master liar, yet no lies spoken by him. Not one that I’ve been able to find. It’s like Pococke asking Grotius, “Where’s your proof of Mahomet’s Pigeon?” No proof!—Let’s ignore all these slanderous fantasies, as they should be ignored. They don’t represent the man; they’re distorted phantoms of him, the result of hatred and darkness.
Looking at the man’s life with our own eyes, it seems to me, a very different hypothesis suggests itself. What little we know of his earlier obscure years, distorted as it has come down to us, does it not all betoken an earnest, affectionate, sincere kind of man? His nervous melancholic temperament indicates rather a seriousness too deep for him. Of those stories of ‘Spectres;’ of the white Spectre in broad daylight, predicting that he should be King of England, we are not bound to believe much;—probably no more than of the other black Spectre, or Devil in person, to whom the Officer saw him sell himself before Worcester Fight! But the mournful, over-sensitive, hypochondriac humour of Oliver, in his young years, is otherwise indisputably known. The Huntingdon Physician told Sir Philip Warwick himself, He had often been sent for at midnight; Mr. Cromwell was full of hypochondria, thought himself near dying, and “had fancies about the Town-cross.” These things are significant. Such an excitable deep-feeling nature, in that rugged stubborn strength of his, is not the symptom of falsehood; it is the symptom and promise of quite other than falsehood!
Looking at the man’s life through our own lens, it seems to me that a very different idea comes to mind. What little we know about his early, obscure years—distorted as it has come down to us—suggests he was an earnest, caring, sincere kind of man. His nervous, melancholic temperament hints at a seriousness that’s too deep for him. We’re not obligated to believe much of the stories about ‘Spectres’; the white Spectre seen in broad daylight predicting he would be King of England is probably just as questionable as the other black Spectre, or Devil, whom the Officer claimed he saw him sell his soul to before the Battle of Worcester! But Oliver’s sad, overly sensitive, hypochondriac nature during his younger years is otherwise undeniably known. The physician from Huntingdon even told Sir Philip Warwick that he had often been called late at night; Mr. Cromwell was full of hypochondria, thought he was close to death, and “had strange ideas about the Town-cross.” These facts are significant. Such an excitable, deep-feeling nature, combined with his rugged, stubborn strength, is not a sign of falsehood; it’s a sign and promise of something quite different from falsehood!
The young Oliver is sent to study Law; falls, or is said to have fallen, for a little period, into some of the dissipations of youth; but if so, speedily repents, abandons all this: not much above twenty, he is married, settled as an altogether grave and quiet man. ‘He 438pays-back what money he had won at gambling,’ says the story;—he does not think any gain of that kind could be really his. It is very interesting, very natural, this ‘conversion,’ as they well name it; this awakening of a great true soul from the worldly slough, to see into the awful truth of things;—to see that time and its shows all rested on Eternity, and this poor Earth of ours was the threshold either of Heaven or of Hell! Oliver’s life at St Ives or Ely, as a sober industrious Farmer, is it not altogether as that of a true and devout man? He has renounced the world and its ways; its prizes are not the thing that can enrich him. He tills the earth; he reads his Bible; daily assembles his servants round him to worship God. He comforts persecuted ministers, is fond of preachers; nay can himself preach,—exhorts his neighbours to be wise, to redeem the time. In all this what ‘hypocrisy,’ ‘ambition,’ ‘cant,’ or other falsity? The man’s hopes, I do believe, were fixed on the other Higher World; his aim to get well thither, by walking well through his humble course in this world. He courts no notice: what could notice here do for him? ‘Ever in his great Taskmaster’s eye.’
The young Oliver is sent to study Law but, for a little while, he falls into some youthful distractions. However, he quickly regrets it and abandons that lifestyle. By the age of twenty, he is married and settled down as a serious and quiet man. "He pays back any money he won from gambling," the story goes; he doesn’t believe any gain like that can really be his. This change, often called a 'conversion,' is very interesting and natural—it shows a great soul awakening from a worldly mindset to grasp the profound truth of things: to realize that time and its fleeting pleasures are all built on Eternity, and this poor Earth is just the threshold to either Heaven or Hell! Oliver’s life in St Ives or Ely, as a sober and hardworking farmer, resembles that of a genuinely devoted person. He has turned his back on the world and its ways; its rewards don’t enrich him. He cultivates the land, reads his Bible, and gathers his servants daily to worship God. He comforts persecuted ministers and enjoys the company of preachers; he can even preach himself, encouraging his neighbors to be wise and make the most of their time. Where is the 'hypocrisy,' 'ambition,' or any other falsehood in that? I truly believe the man’s hopes were set on the Higher World; his goal was to reach it by living well through his humble journey in this world. He seeks no recognition; what could recognition do for him? "Always in his great Taskmaster’s eye."
It is striking, too, how he comes-out once into public view; he, since no other is willing to come: in resistance to a public grievance. I mean, in that matter of the Bedford Fens. No one else will go to law with Authority; therefore he will. That matter once settled, he returns back into obscurity, to his Bible and his Plough. ‘Gain influence’? His influence is the most legitimate; derived from personal knowledge of him, as a just, religious, reasonable and determined man. In this way he has lived till past forty; old age is now in view of him, and the earnest portal of Death and Eternity; it was at this point that he suddenly became ‘ambitious’! I do not interpret his Parliamentary mission in that way!
It's also striking how he steps into the public eye; he does so because no one else is willing to step up in response to a public issue. I'm talking about the situation with the Bedford Fens. Since no one else will challenge the Authority legally, he will. Once that's settled, he goes back to his quiet life with his Bible and his plow. “Gain influence”? His influence is the most legitimate; it comes from people knowing him personally as a fair, religious, reasonable, and determined man. This is how he has lived into his forties; old age is now in his sight, along with the serious reality of Death and Eternity; it was at this point that he suddenly became “ambitious”! I don’t see his Parliamentary mission that way!
His successes in Parliament, his successes through the war, are honest successes of a brave man; who has more resolution in the heart of him, more light in the head of him than other men. His prayers to God; his spoken thanks to the God of Victory, who had preserved 439him safe, and carried him forward so far, through the furious clash of a world all set in conflict, through desperate-looking envelopments at Dunbar; through the death-hail of so many battles; mercy after mercy; to the ‘crowning mercy’ of Worcester Fight: all this is good and genuine for a deep-hearted Calvinistic Cromwell. Only to vain unbelieving Cavaliers, worshipping not God but their own ‘lovelocks,’ frivolities and formalities, living quite apart from contemplations of God, living without God in the world, need it seem hypocritical.
His achievements in Parliament and during the war are genuine successes of a brave man who has more determination in his heart and more clarity in his mind than others. He offers prayers to God and expresses his gratitude to the God of Victory, who has kept him safe and helped him navigate through the intense chaos of a world at war, through the daunting situations at Dunbar, through the deadly barrage of countless battles, and with mercy after mercy, culminating in the 'crowning mercy' of the Worcester Fight. This is all authentic for a deeply earnest Calvinistic Cromwell. Only to the arrogant, unbelieving Cavaliers—who worship not God but their own vanity, trivialities, and rituals, living completely disconnected from thoughts of God, living without God in the world—might it seem hypocritical.
Nor will his participation in the King’s death involve him in condemnation with us. It is a stern business killing of a King! But if you once go to war with him, it lies there; this and all else lies there. Once at war, you have made wager of battle with him: it is he to die, or else you. Reconciliation is problematic; may be possible, or, far more likely, is impossible. It is now pretty generally admitted that the Parliament, having vanquished Charles First, had no way of making any tenable arrangement with him. The large Presbyterian party, apprehensive now of the Independents, were most anxious to do so; anxious indeed as for their own existence; but it could not be. The unhappy Charles, in those final Hampton-Court negotiations, shows himself as a man fatally incapable of being dealt with. A man who, once for all, could not and would not understand:—whose thought did not in any measure represent to him the real fact of the matter; nay worse, whose word did not at all represent his thought. We may say this of him without cruelty, with deep pity rather: but it is true and undeniable. Forsaken there of all but the name of Kingship, he still, finding himself treated with outward respect as a King, fancied that he might play-off party against party, and smuggle himself into his old power by deceiving both. Alas, they both discovered that he was deceiving them. A man whose word will not inform you at all what he means or will do, is not a man you can bargain with. You must get out of that man’s way, or put him out of yours! The Presbyterians, in their despair, were still for believing Charles, though found false, unbelievable again and again. Not so Cromwell: “For all our 440fighting,” says he, “we are to have a little bit of paper?” No!—
Nor will his involvement in the King’s death get him condemned along with us. It’s a serious matter to kill a King! But if you go to war with him, that’s where everything lies; it's all on the line. Once you're at war, you’re betting on a fight with him: either he dies or you do. Making peace afterward is tough; it might be possible, but it’s more likely impossible. It’s now widely accepted that after defeating Charles First, Parliament had no way of reaching any workable agreement with him. The large Presbyterian faction, now worried about the Independents, was very eager to make a deal; they cared for their own survival. But it couldn’t happen. The unfortunate Charles, during those last negotiations at Hampton Court, showed himself to be someone who just couldn’t handle the situation. He was someone who could neither understand nor choose to understand the reality; worse, his words didn’t reflect his thoughts at all. We can say this about him without being cruel, rather with deep pity: but it’s true and undeniable. Left with nothing but the title of Kingship, he still believed that since he was treated with external respect as a King, he could play the factions against each other and sneak back into power by fooling them both. Sadly, they both discovered that he was tricking them. A man whose words don’t tell you what he means or what he will do is not someone you can negotiate with. You have to either stay out of his way or remove him from yours! The Presbyterians, in their hopelessness, still wanted to believe Charles, even though he had proved false repeatedly. Not Cromwell, though: “After all our 440fighting,” he says, “are we just going to have a little piece of paper?” No!—
In fact, everywhere we have to note the decisive practical eye of this man; how he drives towards the practical and practicable; has a genuine insight into what is fact. Such an intellect, I maintain, does not belong to a false man: the false man sees false shows, plausibilities, expediences: the true man is needed to discern even practical truth. Cromwell’s advice about the Parliament’s Army, early in the contest, How they were to dismiss their city-tapsters, flimsy riotous persons, and choose substantial yeomen, whose heart was in the work, to be soldiers for them: this is advice by a man who saw. Fact answers, if you see into Fact. Cromwell’s Ironsides were the embodiment of this insight of his; men fearing God; and without any other fear. No more conclusively genuine set of fighters ever trod the soil of England, or of any other land.
In fact, everywhere we go, we have to acknowledge this man's decisive practical eye; how he focuses on the practical and achievable; he has a real understanding of what is true. I assert that such an intellect doesn’t belong to a dishonest person: the dishonest person sees false appearances, plausible arguments, and makes convenient choices: the honest person is needed to even recognize practical truth. Cromwell’s advice regarding the Parliament’s Army, early in the conflict, on how they should get rid of their city drinkers, unreliable and disorderly individuals, and select solid yeomen, whose hearts were in the work, to be their soldiers: this is advice from a man who saw. Facts respond if you truly understand them. Cromwell’s Ironsides were the embodiment of this insight of his; men who feared God; and without any other fear. No more genuinely committed group of fighters has ever walked the soil of England, or any other land.
Neither will we blame greatly that word of Cromwell’s to them; which was so blamed: “If the King should meet me in battle, I would kill the King.” Why not? These words were spoken to men who stood as before a Higher than Kings. They had set more than their own lives on the cast. The Parliament may call it, in official language, a fighting ‘for the King;’ but we, for our share, cannot understand that. To us it is no dilettante work, no sleek officiality; it is sheer rough death and earnest. They have brought it to the calling-forth of War; horrid internecine fight, man grappling with man in fire-eyed rage,—the infernal element in man called forth, to try it by that! Do that therefore; since that is the thing to be done.—The successes of Cromwell seem to me a very natural thing! Since he was not shot in battle, they were an inevitable thing. That such a man, with the eye to see, with the heart to dare, should advance, from post to post, from victory to victory, till the Huntingdon Farmer became, by whatever name you might call him, the acknowledged Strongest Man in England, virtually the King of England, requires no magic to explain it!—
We won’t heavily criticize Cromwell’s words to them, which were so condemned: “If the King were to confront me in battle, I would kill the King.” Why not? These words were directed at men who saw something greater than Kings. They had put more than their own lives on the line. Parliament may formally call it a fight ‘for the King;’ but we, for our part, can’t grasp that. To us, this isn’t some casual endeavor or polished official statement; it’s about real danger and seriousness. They have brought about the call to War; a horrific internal conflict, with man battling man in intense fury—bringing forth the dark side of humanity to confront it! So let’s do that; since that’s what needs to be done.—Cromwell's successes seem very natural to me! Since he wasn’t killed in battle, they were unavoidable. That such a man, with the vision to see and the courage to act, should move from victory to victory, until the Huntingdon farmer became, by whatever name you choose, the recognized Strongest Man in England, essentially the King of England, doesn’t need any magic to explain!—
Truly it is a sad thing for a people, as for a man, to fall into Scepticism, into dilettantism, insincerity; 441not to know a Sincerity when they see it. For this world, and for all worlds, what curse is so fatal? The heart lying dead, the eye cannot see. What intellect remains is merely the vulpine intellect. That a true King be sent them is of small use; they do not know him when sent. They say scornfully, Is this your King? The Hero wastes his heroic faculty in bootless contradiction from the unworthy; and can accomplish little. For himself he does accomplish a heroic life, which is much, which is all; but for the world he accomplishes comparatively nothing. The wild rude Sincerity, direct from Nature, is not glib in answering from the witness-box; in your small-debt pie-powder court, he is scouted as a counterfeit. The vulpine intellect ‘detects’ him. For being a man worth any thousand men, the response, your Knox, your Cromwell gets, is an argument for two centuries, whether he was a man at all. God’s greatest gift to this Earth is sneeringly flung away. The miraculous talisman is a paltry plated coin, not fit to pass in the shops as a common guinea.
It's truly sad for a society, just like for an individual, to fall into skepticism, dilettantism, and insincerity; 441 to not recognize sincerity when it shows up. What kind of curse could be more destructive for this world, and for all worlds? When the heart is lifeless, the eye cannot perceive. The intellect that remains is merely cunning. It's of little use to send them a true King; they won’t recognize him when he arrives. They scornfully ask, Is this your King? The Hero wastes his heroic qualities in futile arguments against the unworthy, and can achieve very little. For himself, he does achieve a heroic life, which is significant, even everything; but for the world, he achieves comparatively nothing. The raw, honest sincerity, straight from Nature, isn’t smooth or quick to respond in the courtroom; in your small-debt pie-powder court, he’s treated as a fake. The cunning intellect ‘detects’ him. For being a person worth a thousand others, the reception your Knox or Cromwell gets is a debate for two centuries about whether he was a true man at all. God’s greatest gift to this Earth is dismissively thrown away. The miraculous talisman is seen as a cheap plated coin, unfit to be exchanged in shops for a common guinea.
Lamentable this! I say, this must be remedied. Till this be remedied in some measure, there is nothing remedied. ‘Detect quacks’? Yes do, for Heaven’s sake; but know withal the men that are to be trusted! Till we know that, what is all our knowledge; how shall we even so much as ‘detect’? For the vulpine sharpness, which considers itself to be knowledge, and ‘detects’ in that fashion, is far mistaken. Dupes indeed are many: but, of all dupes, there is none so fatally situated as he who lives in undue terror of being duped. The world does exist; the world has truth in it or it would not exist! First recognise what is true, we shall then discern what is false; and properly never till then.
This is unfortunate! I say this needs to be fixed. Until this is addressed in some way, nothing is truly fixed. 'Spot the frauds'? Yes, please do, for goodness' sake; but also know who can actually be trusted! Until we know that, what is all our knowledge worth? How can we even begin to 'spot' anything? The cunning sharpness that thinks it knows and 'detects' in that way is completely wrong. There are indeed many fools, but of all fools, none are in a worse situation than someone who lives in constant fear of being fooled. The world does exist; the world has truth in it, or it wouldn’t exist! First, recognize what is true, then we can discern what is false—and only then.
‘Know the men that are to be trusted:’ alas, this is yet, in these days, very far from us. The sincere alone can recognise sincerity. Not a Hero only is needed, but a world fit for him; a world not of Valets;—the Hero comes almost in vain to it otherwise! Yes, it is far from us: but it must come; thank God, it is visibly coming. Till it do come, what have we? Ballot-boxes, suffrages, French Revolutions:—if we are as 442Valets, and do not know the Hero when we see him, what good are all these? A heroic Cromwell comes; and for a hundred-and-fifty years he cannot have a vote from us. Why, the insincere, unbelieving world is the natural property of the Quack, and of the Father of quacks and quackeries! Misery, confusion, unveracity are alone possible there. By ballot-boxes we alter the figure of our Quack; but the substance of him continues. The Valet-World has to be governed by the Sham-Hero, by the King merely dressed in King-gear. It is his; he is its! In brief, one of two things: We shall either learn to know a Hero, a true Governor and Captain, somewhat better, when we see him; or else go on to be forever governed by the Unheroic;—had we ballot-boxes clattering at every street-corner, there were no remedy in these.
‘Know the men you can trust:’ unfortunately, this is still very distant for us today. Only the genuine can recognize genuineness. We need not just a Hero, but a world that can support him; a world not filled with Valets;—otherwise, the Hero comes almost in vain! Yes, it’s far from us: but it must come; thankfully, it is clearly on its way. Until it arrives, what do we have? Ballot boxes, votes, French Revolutions:—if we are still like 442Valets, and cannot recognize the Hero when he appears, what good are all these? A heroic Cromwell comes; yet for a hundred and fifty years, he can’t get a vote from us. Why, the insincere, disbelieving world naturally belongs to the Quack, and to the Father of quacks and quackeries! Only misery, confusion, and untruth can thrive there. Through ballot boxes, we change the appearance of our Quack; but his essence remains the same. The Valet-World has to be ruled by the Sham-Hero, by the King merely dressed in royal attire. It belongs to him; he belongs to it! In short, we have two choices: We will either learn to recognize a Hero, a true Leader and Captain, a bit better when we see him; or continue to be ruled by the Unheroic;—even with ballot boxes clanging at every street corner, there would be no solution to this.
Poor Cromwell,—great Cromwell! The inarticulate Prophet; Prophet who could not speak. Rude, confused, struggling to utter himself, with his savage depth, with his wild sincerity; and he looked so strange, among the elegant Euphemisms, dainty little Falklands, didactic Chillingworths, diplomatic Clarendons! Consider him. An outer hull of chaotic confusion, visions of the Devil, nervous dreams, almost semi-madness; and yet such a clear determinate man’s-energy working in the heart of that. A kind of chaotic man. The ray as of pure starlight and fire, working in such an element of boundless hypochondria, unformed black of darkness! And yet withal this hypochondria, what was it but the very greatness of the man? The depth and tenderness of his wild affections: the quantity of sympathy he had with things,—the quantity of insight he would yet get into the heart of things, the mastery he would yet get over things: this was his hypochondria. The man’s misery, as man’s misery always does, came of his greatness. Samuel Johnson too is that kind of man. Sorrow-stricken, half-distracted; the wide element of mournful black enveloping him,—wide as the world. It is the character of a prophetic man; a man with his whole soul seeing, and struggling to see.
Poor Cromwell—great Cromwell! The inarticulate Prophet; the Prophet who couldn’t speak. Rough, confused, struggling to express himself, with his savage profundity and wild sincerity; he looked so out of place among the elegant Euphemisms, delicate little Falklands, didactic Chillingworths, and diplomatic Clarendons! Think about him. An outer shell of chaotic confusion, visions of the devil, nervous dreams, almost semi-madness; and yet a clear, determined man’s energy workings at the core of that chaos. A kind of chaotic man. A ray of pure starlight and fire, existing in such an environment of boundless hypochondria, unformed black darkness! And even with all this hypochondria, what was it but the very greatness of the man? The depth and tenderness of his wild affections: the amount of sympathy he had with things—the insight he would yet gain into the heart of things, the mastery he would yet acquire over things: that was his hypochondria. The man’s sorrow, as it often does, originated from his greatness. Samuel Johnson is also that type of man. Deeply sorrowful, half-distracted; enveloped by the wide element of mournful black—as broad as the world. It’s the trait of a prophetic man; a man with his whole soul seeing and struggling to see.
On this ground, too, I explain to myself Cromwell’s reputed confusion of speech. To himself the internal 443meaning was sun-clear; but the material with which he was to clothe it in utterance was not there. He had lived silent; a great unnamed sea of Thought round him all his days; and in his way of life little call to attempt naming or uttering that. With his sharp power of vision, resolute power of action, I doubt not he could have learned to write Books withal, and speak fluently enough:—he did harder things than writing of Books. This kind of man is precisely he who is fit for doing manfully all things you will set him on doing. Intellect is not speaking and logicising; it is seeing and ascertaining. Virtue, Vir-tus, manhood, hero-hood, is not fair-spoken immaculate regularity; it is first of all, what the Germans well name it, Tugend (Taugend, dow-ing or Dough-tiness), Courage and the Faculty to do. This basis of the matter Cromwell had in him.
On this point, I also try to understand Cromwell’s supposed speech confusion. To him, the meaning was crystal clear; however, he lacked the words to express it. He had lived in silence, surrounded by a vast, unnamed sea of Thought his whole life, and in his way of living, there was little reason to try to name or express that. With his keen vision and strong will, I have no doubt he could have learned to write books and speak quite fluently—he accomplished harder tasks than writing books. This type of person is exactly the one suited to tackle anything you set before him. Intellect isn’t just about speaking and reasoning; it’s about seeing and understanding. Virtue, manhood, heroism, isn’t just polished, flawless regularity; it is primarily what the Germans call Tugend (Taugend, doing or Dough-tiness), which means courage and the ability to take action. Cromwell had this foundational quality within him.
One understands moreover how, though he could not speak in Parliament, he might preach, rhapsodic preaching; above all, how he might be great in extempore prayer. These are the free outpouring utterances of what is in the heart: method is not required in them; warmth, depth, sincerity are all that is required. Cromwell’s habit of prayer is a notable feature of him. All his great enterprises were commenced with prayer. In dark inextricable-looking difficulties, his Officers and he used to assemble, and pray alternately, for hours, for days, till some definite resolution rose among them, some ‘door of hope,’ as they would name it, disclosed itself. Consider that. In tears, in fervent prayers, and cries to the great God, to have pity on them, to make His light shine before them. They, armed Soldiers of Christ, as they felt themselves to be; a little band of Christian Brothers, who had drawn the sword against a great black devouring world not Christian, but Mammonish, Devilish,—they cried to God in their straits, in their extreme need, not to forsake the Cause that was His. The light which now rose upon them,—how could a human soul, by any means at all, get better light? Was not the purpose so formed like to be precisely the best, wisest, the one to be followed without hesitation any more? To them it was as the 444shining of Heaven’s own Splendour in the waste-howling darkness; the Pillar of Fire by night, that was to guide them on their desolate perilous way. Was it not such? Can a man’s soul, to this hour, get guidance by any other method than intrinsically by that same,—devout prostration of the earnest struggling soul before the Highest, the Giver of all Light; be such prayer a spoken, articulate, or be it a voiceless, inarticulate one? There is no other method. ‘Hypocrisy’? One begins to be weary of all that. They who call it so, have no right to speak on such matters. They never formed a purpose, what one can call a purpose. They went about balancing expediences, plausibilities; gathering votes, advices; they never were alone with the truth of a thing at all.—Cromwell’s prayers were likely to be ‘eloquent,’ and much more than that. His was the heart of a man who could pray.
One understands how, even though he couldn’t speak in Parliament, he could still preach, passionately sharing his thoughts; especially how he could excel in spontaneous prayer. These are the heartfelt expressions of what lies within: no method is necessary; all that’s needed is warmth, depth, and sincerity. Cromwell’s habit of prayer is a significant part of who he was. All of his major undertakings began with prayer. In seemingly impossible situations, his officers and he would gather and take turns praying, for hours or even days, until a clear decision emerged among them, a ‘door of hope,’ as they would call it, opened up. Think about that. In tears and fervent prayers, they cried out to God, asking for mercy, to let His light shine upon them. They saw themselves as armed Soldiers of Christ; a small group of Christian Brothers who had taken up arms against a vast, devouring world that was not Christian, but greedy and devilish—they called on God in their struggles, in their greatest need, not to abandon the Cause that was His. The light that rose upon them—how could any human soul find better guidance? Wasn’t the purpose so formed precisely the best, the wisest, the one to follow without hesitation? To them, it was like the 444shining of Heaven’s own brightness in the dark wilderness; the Pillar of Fire by night, guiding them on their perilous journey. Was it not just that? Can a man’s soul still find guidance any other way than through that—humbly prostrating the earnest, struggling soul before the Highest, the Giver of all Light; whether such prayer is spoken or unspoken? There is no other way. ‘Hypocrisy’? One is starting to grow tired of that. Those who call it such have no right to comment on these matters. They’ve never formed a purpose, what one would call a purpose. They just weighed options and probabilities; they gathered votes and advice; they were never truly alone with the truth of a thing. Cromwell’s prayers were likely to be ‘eloquent,’ and much more than that. He had the heart of a man who could pray.
But indeed his actual Speeches, I apprehend, were not nearly so ineloquent, incondite, as they look. We find he was, what all speakers aim to be, an impressive speaker, even in Parliament; one who, from the first, had weight. With that rude passionate voice of his, he was always understood to mean something, and men wished to know what. He disregarded eloquence, nay despised and disliked it; spoke always without premeditation of the words he was to use. The Reporters, too, in those days seem to have been singularly candid; and to have given the Printer precisely what they found on their own notepaper. And withal, what a strange proof is it of Cromwell’s being the premeditative ever-calculating hypocrite, acting a play before the world, That to the last he took no more charge of his Speeches! How came he not to study his words a little, before flinging them out to the public? If the words were true words, they could be left to shift for themselves.
But his actual speeches, I believe, were not nearly as awkward or poorly put together as they appear. We see that he was, like all good speakers aspire to be, an impressive speaker, even in Parliament; someone who, from the start, carried weight. With that rough, passionate voice of his, he was always understood to mean something, and people wanted to know what it was. He ignored eloquence, even looked down on it and didn’t like it; he always spoke without planning the words he would use. The reporters at that time also seem to have been unusually honest, giving the printer exactly what they found on their own notepads. And it's strange evidence of Cromwell being the ever-calculating hypocrite, performing for the world, that he took no more care over his speeches to the very end! Why didn’t he take some time to consider his words before throwing them out to the public? If the words were true, they could stand on their own.
But with regard to Cromwell’s ‘lying,’ we will make one remark. This, I suppose, or something like this, to have been the nature of it. All parties found themselves deceived in him; each party understood him to be meaning this, heard him even say so, and behold he 445turns-out to have been meaning that! He was, cry they, the chief of liars. But now, intrinsically, is not all this the inevitable fortune, not of a false man in such times, but simply of a superior man? Such a man must have reticences in him. If he walk wearing his heart upon his sleeve for daws to peck at, his journey will not extend far! There is no use for any man’s taking-up his abode in a house built of glass. A man always is to be himself the judge how much of his mind he will show to other men; even to those he would have work along with him. There are impertinent inquiries made: your rule is, to leave the inquirer uninformed on that matter; not, if you can help it, misinformed; but precisely as dark as he was! This, could one hit the right phrase of response, is what the wise and faithful man would aim to answer in such a case.
But when it comes to Cromwell’s so-called ‘lying,’ we’ll make one observation. This, I suppose, or something similar, was the essence of it. Every group felt misled by him; each group believed he meant this, even heard him say so, only to discover that he actually meant that! They cried out that he was the biggest liar. But isn’t all this, fundamentally, just the unavoidable fate not of a dishonest man during such times, but simply of a superior individual? Such a person must have reticences within them. If he goes around wearing his heart on his sleeve for others to pick at, he won't get far! There’s no point in anyone living in a house made of glass. A person must always be the judge of how much of his thoughts he shows to others, even to those he wants to collaborate with. There are intrusive questions asked: your guideline is to keep the inquirer uninformed on that topic; and if you can help it, not misinformed; but just as much in the dark as they were! This, if one could find the right way to respond, is what a wise and loyal person would strive to convey in such a situation.
Cromwell, no doubt of it, spoke often in the dialect of small subaltern parties; uttered to them a part of his mind. Each little party thought him all its own. Hence their rage, one and all, to find him not of their party, but of his own party! Was it his blame? At all seasons of his history he must have felt, among such people, how, if he explained to them the deeper insight he had, they must either have shuddered aghast at it, or believing it, their own little compact hypothesis must have gone wholly to wreck. They could not have worked in his province any more; nay perhaps they could not now have worked in their own province. It is the inevitable position of a great man among small men. Small men, most active, useful, are to be seen everywhere, whose whole activity depends on some conviction which to you is palpably a limited one; imperfect, what we call an error. But would it be a kindness always, is it a duty always or often, to disturb them in that? Many a man, doing loud work in the world, stands only on some thin traditionality, conventionality; to him indubitable, to you incredible: break that beneath him, he sinks to endless depths! “I might have my hand full of truth,” said Fontenelle, “and open only my little finger.”
Cromwell, there's no doubt, often spoke in the language of small, lesser groups; he shared part of his thoughts with them. Each small group believed he was completely theirs. That's why they were all so furious to discover he wasn't part of their group, but had his own agenda! Was that his fault? Throughout his life, he must have realized that if he shared the deeper insights he had with these people, they would either have been horrified by it or, if they accepted it, their narrow little beliefs would fall apart completely. They couldn't have operated in his realm anymore; in fact, they might not have been able to operate even within their own confines. This is the inevitable situation for a significant figure among smaller individuals. You can find small-minded people—often very active and useful—everywhere, whose entire productivity relies on a belief that you can clearly see is limited; imperfect, what we call a mistake. But is it always kind, or a duty, to disturb them in this belief? Many a person making noise in the world stands only on some flimsy tradition or convention; it's undeniable to them but unbelievable to you: if you shatter that foundation beneath them, they plunge into despair! “I might have my hand full of truth,” said Fontenelle, “and only open my little finger.”
And if this be the fact even in matters of doctrine, 446how much more in all departments of practice! He that cannot withal keep his mind to himself cannot practise any considerable thing whatever. And we call it ‘dissimulation,’ all this? What would you think of calling the general of an army a dissembler because he did not tell every corporal and private soldier, who pleased to put the question, what his thoughts were about everything?—Cromwell, I should rather say, managed all this in a manner we must admire for its perfection. An endless vortex of such questioning ‘corporals’ rolled confusedly round him through his whole course; whom he did answer. It must have been as a great true-seeing man that he managed this too. Not one proved falsehood, as I said; not one! Of what man that ever wound himself through such a coil of things will you say so much?—
And if this is true even in matters of doctrine, 446how much more so in every area of practice! Anyone who can't keep his thoughts to himself can't accomplish anything significant at all. And we call it ‘dissimulation,’ all this? What would you think of calling the general of an army a dissembler because he didn’t share his thoughts about everything with every corporal and private soldier who asked?—Cromwell, I’d rather say, handled all this in a way we must admire for its perfection. An endless whirlwind of such questioning ‘corporals’ swarmed around him throughout his entire journey; he did answer them. He must have approached it as a truly insightful person would. Not one falsehood, as I said; not one! What other person who has navigated such a tangled mess can you say the same about?—
But in fact there are two errors, widely prevalent, which pervert to the very basis our judgments formed about such men as Cromwell; about their ‘ambition,’ ‘falsity,’ and such-like. The first is what I might call substituting the goal of their career for the course and starting point of it. The vulgar Historian of a Cromwell fancies that he had determined on being Protector of England, at the time when he was ploughing the marsh lands of Cambridgeshire. His career lay all mapped-out: a program of the whole drama; which he then step by step dramatically unfolded, with all manner of cunning, deceptive dramaturgy, as he went on,—the hollow, scheming Ὑποκριτής, or Play-actor that he was! This is a radical perversion; all but universal in such cases. And think for an instant how different the fact is! How much does one of us foresee of his own life? Short way ahead of us it is all dim; an unwound skein of possibilities, of apprehensions, attemptabilities, vague-looming hopes. This Cromwell had not his life lying all in that fashion of Program, which he needed then, with that unfathomable cunning of his, only to enact dramatically, scene after scene! Not so. We see it so; but to him it was in no measure so. What absurdities would fall-away of themselves, were this one undeniable fact kept honestly in view by History! 447Historians indeed will tell you that they do keep it in view;—but look whether such is practically the fact! Vulgar History, as in this Cromwell’s case, omits it altogether; even the best kinds of History only remember it now and then. To remember it duly with rigorous perfection, as in the fact it stood, requires indeed a rare faculty; rare, nay impossible. A very Shakspeare for faculty; or more than Shakspeare; who could enact a brother-man’s biography, see with the brother-man’s eyes at all points of his course what things he saw; in short, know his course and him, as few ‘Historians’ are like to do. Half or more of all the thick-plied perversions which distort our image of Cromwell, will disappear, if we honestly so much as try to represent them so; in sequence, as they were; not in the lump, as they are thrown-down before us.
But actually, there are two common misconceptions that distort our understanding of figures like Cromwell, particularly regarding their 'ambition,' 'deceit,' and similar traits. The first error is what I call confusing the goal of their career with the course and starting point of it. The average historian of Cromwell imagines he decided to become the Protector of England while he was farming the marshlands of Cambridgeshire. His career seems pre-planned, like a script of the entire drama, which he then unfolds step by step with various cunning and deceptive theatrics—just the hollow, scheming Hypocrite, or actor he was! This is a fundamental distortion, nearly universal in such cases. Consider how different the reality is! How much can any of us predict about our own lives? The near future is all blurry—a tangled skein of possibilities, feelings, attempts, and vague hopes. Cromwell did not have his life laid out like that Program he could just enact dramatically, scene by scene! That's how we see it, but to him it was not like that at all. What absurdities would vanish if history honestly kept in mind this undeniable fact! 447Historians will claim they remember it—but check if that's true! Common History, as in Cromwell's case, completely ignores it; even the best historians only recall it sporadically. To accurately remember it as it was requires a rare talent; it's exceptional, almost impossible. A true Shakespearean talent, or even more; someone who could enact a fellow human's life, seeing through his eyes as he navigated events—essentially, knowing him and his journey as few 'historians' can. Many of the thick layers of distortions that misrepresent Cromwell will fade away if we merely attempt to present them sequentially, as they were, rather than all at once, as they are thrown together in front of us.
But a second error, which I think the generality commit, refers to this same ‘ambition’ itself. We exaggerate the ambition of Great Men; we mistake what the nature of it is. Great Men are not ambitious in that sense; he is a small poor man that is ambitious so. Examine the man who lives in misery because he does not shine above other men; who goes about producing himself, pruriently anxious about his gifts and claims; struggling to force everybody, as it were begging everybody for God’s sake, to acknowledge him a great man, and set him over the heads of men! Such a creature is among the wretchedest sights seen under this sun. A great man? A poor morbid prurient empty man; fitter for the ward of a hospital, than for a throne among men. I advise you to keep-out of his way. He cannot walk on quiet paths; unless you will look at him, wonder at him, write paragraphs about him, he cannot live. It is the emptiness of the man, not his greatness. Because there is nothing in himself, he hungers and thirsts that you would find something in him. In good truth, I believe no great man, not so much as a genuine man who had health and real substance in him of whatever magnitude, was ever much tormented in this way.
But a second mistake that I believe most people make relates to this same 'ambition'. We overstate the ambition of Great Men; we misinterpret its true nature. Great Men aren't ambitious in that way; it's the small, poor man who is truly ambitious like that. Look at the person who lives in misery because he doesn't stand out from others; someone who is constantly trying to showcase himself, anxiously worried about his talents and recognition; struggling to make everyone acknowledge him as a great man, begging to be placed above others! Such a person is one of the most pitiful sights under this sun. A great man? A poor, sickly, desperate person; more suited for a hospital ward than for a throne among others. I advise you to avoid him. He can't walk quietly; unless you admire him, marvel at him, or write about him, he cannot exist. It's the emptiness of the man, not his greatness. Because he has nothing in himself, he craves that you find something in him. Honestly, I believe no great man, not even a genuinely healthy and substantial person of any kind, has ever been seriously troubled in this way.
Your Cromwell, what good could it do him to be ‘noticed’ by noisy crowds of people? God his Maker 448already noticed him. He, Cromwell, was already there; no notice would make him other than he already was. Till his hair was grown gray; and Life from the downhill slope was all seen to be limited, not infinite but finite, and all a measurable matter how it went,—he had been content to plough the ground, and read his Bible. He in his old days could not support it any longer, without selling himself to Falsehood, that he might ride in gilt carriages to Whitehall, and have clerks with bundles of papers haunting him, “Decide this, decide that,” which in utmost sorrow of heart no man can perfectly decide! What could gilt carriages do for this man? From of old, was there not in his life a weight of meaning, a terror and a splendour as of Heaven itself? His existence there as man set him beyond the need of gilding. Death, Judgment and Eternity: these already lay as the background of whatsoever he thought or did. All his life lay begirt as in a sea of nameless Thoughts, which no speech of a mortal could name. God’s Word, as the Puritan prophets of that time had read it: this was great, and all else was little to him. To call such a man ‘ambitious,’ to figure him as the prurient windbag described above, seems to me the poorest solecism. Such a man will say: “Keep your gilt carriages and huzzaing mobs, keep your red-tape clerks, your influentialities, your important businesses. Leave me alone, leave me alone; there is too much of life in me already!” Old Samuel Johnson, the greatest soul in England in his day, was not ambitious. ‘Corsica Boswell’ flaunted at public shows with printed ribbons round his hat; but the great old Samuel stayed at home. The world-wide soul wrapt-up in its thoughts, in its sorrows;—what could paradings, and ribbons in the hat, do for it?
Your Cromwell, what good would it do him to be 'noticed' by loud crowds of people? God, his Creator, already noticed him. He, Cromwell, was already there; no attention would change who he was. Until his hair turned gray, and as life on the downhill slope became clearly limited—not infinite, but finite, and all a measurable matter of how it went—he had been content to work the land and read his Bible. In his old age, he couldn’t stand it anymore without selling himself to Falsehood, just to ride in fancy carriages to Whitehall and have clerks with stacks of papers bothering him, “Decide this, decide that,” which no man can decide perfectly with a heavy heart! What could fancy carriages do for this man? From long ago, didn’t his life carry a weight of meaning, a terror and splendor like Heaven itself? His existence as a man already set him beyond the need for embellishment. Death, Judgment, and Eternity: these were the backdrop of everything he thought or did. His life was surrounded by a sea of nameless Thoughts, which no mortal speech could name. God’s Word, as the Puritan prophets of that time understood it: this was significant, and everything else seemed small to him. To call such a man ‘ambitious,’ to portray him as the flashy windbag described above, seems to me the greatest misunderstanding. Such a man would say: “Keep your fancy carriages and cheering crowds, keep your bureaucratic clerks, your connections, your important affairs. Leave me alone; there is too much of life in me already!” Old Samuel Johnson, the greatest soul in England in his time, was not ambitious. ‘Corsica Boswell’ showed off at public events with printed ribbons around his hat, but great old Samuel stayed home. The world-worn soul wrapped up in its thoughts, in its sorrows—what could parades and ribbons in the hat do for it?
Ah yes, I will say again: The great silent men! Looking round on the noisy inanity of the world, words with little meaning, actions with little worth, one loves to reflect on the great Empire of Silence. The noble silent men, scattered here and there, each in his department; silently thinking, silently working; whom no Morning Newspaper makes mention of! They are the salt of the Earth. A country that has none or few of 449these is in a bad way. Like a forest which had no roots; which had all turned into leaves and boughs;—which must soon wither and be no forest. Woe for us if we had nothing but what we can show, or speak. Silence, the great Empire of Silence: higher than the stars; deeper than the Kingdoms of Death! It alone is great; all else is small.—I hope we English will long maintain our grand talent pour le silence. Let others that cannot do without standing on barrel-heads, to spout, and be seen of all the market-place, cultivate speech exclusively,—become a most green forest without roots! Solomon says, There is a time to speak; but also a time to keep silence. Of some great silent Samuel, not urged to writing, as old Samuel Johnson says he was, by want of money, and nothing other, one might ask, “Why do not you too get up and speak; promulgate your system, found your sect?” “Truly,” he will answer, “I am continent of my thought hitherto; happily I have yet had the ability to keep it in me, no compulsion strong enough to speak it. My ‘system’ is not for promulgation first of all; it is for serving myself to live by. That is the great purpose of it to me. And then the ‘honour’? Alas, yes;—but as Cato said of the statue: So many statues in that Forum of yours, may it not be better if they ask, Where is Cato’s statue?”—
Ah yes, I’ll say it again: The great silent men! Looking around at the noisy nonsense of the world, words with little meaning, actions with little value, you can’t help but think about the great Empire of Silence. The noble silent men, scattered here and there, each excelling in his field; silently thinking, silently working; who are mentioned in no Morning Newspaper! They are the salt of the Earth. A country that has few or none of 449 these is in a bad way. Like a forest that has no roots; which has turned entirely into leaves and branches;—which will soon wither and cease to be a forest. Woe to us if we have nothing but what we can show or speak. Silence, the great Empire of Silence: higher than the stars; deeper than the Kingdoms of Death! It alone is great; everything else is small.—I hope we English will long maintain our grand talent pour le silence. Let others who can’t help but stand on soapboxes, shouting and seeking attention in the marketplace, focus solely on speech—becoming a lush forest without roots! Solomon says, There is a time to speak; but also a time to keep silent. Of some great silent Samuel, not driven to write as old Samuel Johnson claimed he was, by lack of money, or anything else, one might ask, “Why don’t you get up and speak; promote your ideas, start your own movement?” “Honestly,” he would reply, “I am continent of my thoughts up to now; thankfully, I’ve managed to keep them inside me, with no pressure strong enough to make me speak. My ‘system’ is not for promoting first and foremost; it’s for helping me live. That’s its main purpose for me. And then the ‘honor’? Alas, yes;—but as Cato said about the statue: So many statues in that Forum of yours, wouldn’t it be better if they asked, Where is Cato’s statue?”—
But, now, by way of counterpoise to this of Silence, let me say that there are two kinds of ambition; one wholly blamable, the other laudable and inevitable. Nature has provided that the great silent Samuel shall not be silent too long. The selfish wish to shine over others, let it be accounted altogether poor and miserable. ‘Seekest thou great things, seek them not:’ this is most true. And yet, I say, there is an irrepressible tendency in every man to develop himself according to the magnitude which Nature has made him of; to speak-out, to act-out, what Nature has laid in him. This is proper, fit, inevitable; nay it is a duty, and even the summary of duties for a man. The meaning of life here on earth might be defined as consisting in this: To unfold your self, to work what thing you have the faculty for. It is a necessity for the human being, the 450first law of our existence. Coleridge beautifully remarks that the infant learns to speak by this necessity it feels.—We will say therefore: To decide about ambition, whether it is bad or not, you have two things to take into view. Not the coveting of the place alone, but the fitness of the man for the place withal: that is the question. Perhaps the place was his; perhaps he had a natural right, and even obligation, to seek the place! Mirabeau’s ambition to be Prime Minister, how shall we blame it, if he were ‘the only man in France that could have done any good there’? Hopefuler perhaps had he not so clearly felt how much good he could do! But a poor Necker, who could do no good, and had even felt that he could do none, yet sitting broken-hearted because they had flung him out, and he was now quit of it, well might Gibbon mourn over him.—Nature, I say, has provided amply that the silent great man shall strive to speak withal; too amply, rather!
But now, to balance this discussion about Silence, let me say there are two types of ambition: one that is entirely blameworthy and another that is admirable and unavoidable. Nature has ensured that the great silent Samuel won't remain silent for too long. The selfish desire to outshine others should be seen as completely pathetic and miserable. 'If you seek great things, don’t pursue them'—this is very true. Yet, I argue that there is an unstoppable urge in every person to grow into the magnitude that Nature has given them; to express themselves, to act on what Nature has instilled in them. This is appropriate, necessary, even a duty, and really the essence of a man's responsibilities. The meaning of life here on earth could be summed up as: to unfold your self, to develop the talents you possess. This is a human necessity, the 450first law of our existence. Coleridge beautifully points out that an infant learns to speak because of this necessity it feels. So, when it comes to judging ambition—whether it's good or bad—you need to consider two things. Not just the desire for the position but also the person's suitability for that position; that’s the key question. Maybe the position was his; perhaps he had a natural right, even an obligation, to pursue it! Mirabeau’s ambition to be Prime Minister—how can we criticize it if he was 'the only man in France who could have made a difference there'? It might have been better if he hadn't so clearly felt how much good he could do! But poor Necker, who couldn't do any good and even recognized his inability, sat there heartbroken because they had tossed him out and he was now free from it—all of this could certainly make Gibbon mourn for him. I contend that Nature has made ample provision for the great silent man to strive to speak; too ample, in fact!
Fancy, for example, you had revealed to the brave old Samuel Johnson, in his shrouded-up existence, that it was possible for him to do priceless divine work for his country and the whole world. That the perfect Heavenly Law might be made law on this earth; that the prayer he prayed daily, ‘Thy kingdom come,’ was at length to be fulfilled! If you had convinced his judgment of this; that it was possible, practicable; that he the mournful silent Samuel was called to take a part in it! Would not the whole soul of the man have flamed up into a divine clearness, into noble utterance and determination to act; casting all sorrows and misgivings under his feet, counting all affliction and contradiction small,—the whole dark element of his existence blazing into articulate radiance of light and lightning? It were a true ambition this! And think now how it actually was with Cromwell. From of old, the sufferings of God’s Church, true zealous preachers of the truth flung into dungeons, whipt, set on pillories, their ears cropt off, God’s Gospel-cause trodden under foot of the unworthy: all this had lain heavy on his soul. Long years he had looked upon it, in silence, in prayer; seeing no remedy on Earth; trusting well that a remedy in Heaven’s goodness would come,—that such 451a course was false, unjust, and could not last forever. And now behold the dawn of it; after twelve years silent waiting, all England stirs itself; there is to be once more a Parliament, the Right will get a voice for itself: inexpressible well-grounded hope has come again into the Earth. Was not such a Parliament worth being a member of? Cromwell threw down his ploughs and hastened thither.
Imagine if you had revealed to the brave old Samuel Johnson, in his isolated existence, that he could do invaluable work for his country and the world. That the perfect Heavenly Law could become law on earth; that the prayer he said every day, ‘Thy kingdom come,’ was finally going to come true! If you had convinced him of this; that it was possible and achievable; that he, the sorrowful, silent Samuel, was meant to play a role in it! Wouldn’t the entirety of his being have ignited with divine clarity, leading to noble expression and a determination to act; pushing aside all sorrows and doubts, dismissing all suffering and opposition as insignificant,—transforming the dark aspects of his life into a brilliant light? What an admirable ambition that would be! And think about how it actually was with Cromwell. For a long time, the suffering of God’s Church, true passionate preachers of the truth thrown into dungeons, whipped, put on pillories, their ears cut off, God’s Gospel trampled underfoot by the unworthy: all this weighed heavily on his soul. For many years he had watched it, in silence and prayer; seeing no solution on Earth; trusting that a solution would come from Heaven’s goodness,—that such a course was false, unjust, and couldn’t last forever. And now, behold the dawn of it; after twelve years of silent waiting, all England was stirring; there would be a Parliament again, and the Right would have a voice: an indescribable, well-founded hope had returned to the Earth. Wasn’t such a Parliament worth joining? Cromwell set aside his plows and rushed there.
He spoke there,—rugged bursts of earnestness, of a self-seen truth, where we get a glimpse of them. He worked there; he fought and strove, like a strong true giant of a man, through cannon-tumult and all else,—on and on, till the Cause triumphed, its once so formidable enemies all swept from before it, and the dawn of hope had become clear light of victory and certainty. That he stood there as the strongest soul of England, the undisputed Hero of all England,—what of this? It was possible that the law of Christ’s Gospel could now establish itself in the world! The Theocracy which John Knox in his pulpit might dream of as a ‘devout imagination,’ this practical man, experienced in the whole chaos of most rough practice, dared to consider as capable of being realised. Those that were highest in Christ’s Church, the devoutest wisest men, were to rule the land: in some considerable degree, it might be so and should be so. Was it not true, God’s truth? And if true, was it not then the very thing to do? The strongest practical intellect in England dared to answer, Yes! This I call a noble true purpose; is it not, In its own dialect, the noblest that could enter into the heart of Statesman or man? For a Knox to take it up was something; but for a Cromwell, with his great sound sense and experience of what our world was,—History, I think, shows it only this once in such a degree. I account it the culminating point of Protestantism; the most heroic phasis that ‘Faith in the Bible’ was appointed to exhibit here below. Fancy it: that it were made manifest to one of us, how we could make the Right supremely victorious over Wrong, and all that we had longed and prayed for, as the highest good to England and all lands, an attainable fact!
He spoke there—powerful bursts of sincerity and a truth he had seen for himself, giving us a glimpse of them. He worked there; he fought and struggled like a strong, genuine giant of a man, through the chaos of battle and everything else—on and on, until the Cause triumphed, its once formidable enemies all swept away, and the dawn of hope had become the bright light of victory and certainty. That he stood there as the strongest figure in England, the undisputed Hero of England—what does that mean? It was possible that the law of Christ’s Gospel could now be established in the world! The theocracy that John Knox might dream of from his pulpit as a ‘devout imagination,’ this practical man, experienced in the chaos of rough reality, dared to consider as achievable. Those at the highest levels of Christ’s Church, the most devoted and wise men, were meant to rule the land: to some extent, it could and should be this way. Was it not true, God’s truth? And if it was true, was it not the very thing to pursue? The strongest practical intellect in England had the courage to answer, Yes! I call this a noble true purpose; isn’t it, in its own way, the most noble that could enter the heart of any statesman or man? For a Knox to take it up was something, but for a Cromwell, with his great practical sense and experience of what our world was—History, I believe, only shows this once at such a level. I consider it the peak of Protestantism; the most heroic phase that ‘Faith in the Bible’ was meant to exhibit here on Earth. Imagine if it were revealed to one of us how we could make the Right completely victorious over Wrong, and all that we had longed and prayed for, as the highest good for England and all nations, an attainable fact!
Well, I must say, the vulpine intellect, with its knowingness, 452its alertness and expertness in ‘detecting hypocrites,’ seems to me a rather sorry business. We have had one such Statesman in England; one man, that I can get sight of, who ever had in the heart of him any such purpose at all. One man, in the course of fifteen hundred years; and this was his welcome. He had adherents by the hundred or the ten; opponents by the million. Had England rallied all round him,—why, then, England might have been a Christian land! As it is, vulpine knowingness sits yet at its hopeless problem, ‘Given a world of Knaves, to educe an Honesty from their united action;’—how cumbrous a problem, you may see in Chancery Law-Courts, and some other places! Till at length, by Heaven’s just anger, but also by Heaven’s great grace, the matter begins to stagnate; and this problem is becoming to all men a palpably hopeless one.—
Well, I have to say, the clever intellect, with its awareness, 452its alertness and skill in ‘spotting hypocrites,’ seems to me a pretty sad situation. We have had one such statesman in England; one person that I can think of, who ever had in his heart such a purpose at all. One person, in the course of fifteen hundred years; and this was his welcome. He had supporters by the hundreds or tens; opponents by the millions. If England had rallied around him,—well, then, England might have been a Christian land! As it stands, cleverness still grapples with its hopeless problem, ‘Given a world of Knaves, to bring out an Honesty from their combined efforts;’—how cumbersome a problem, as you can see in Chancery Law Courts, and some other places! Eventually, by Heaven’s just anger, but also by Heaven’s great grace, the situation begins to stagnate; and this problem is becoming palpably hopeless for everyone.—
But with regard to Cromwell and his purposes: Hume and a multitude following him, come upon me here with an admission that Cromwell was sincere at first; a sincere ‘Fanatic’ at first, but gradually became a ‘Hypocrite’ as things opened round him. This of the Fanatic-Hypocrite is Hume’s theory of it; extensively applied since,—to Mahomet and many others. Think of it seriously, you will find something in it; not much, not all, very far from all. Sincere hero hearts do not sink in this miserable manner. The Sun flings forth impurities, gets balefully incrusted with spots; but it does not quench itself, and become no Sun at all, but a mass of Darkness! I will venture to say that such never befell a great, deep Cromwell; I think, never. Nature’s own lion-hearted Son! Antæus-like, his strength is got by touching the Earth, his Mother; lift him up from the Earth, lift him up into Hypocrisy, Inanity, his strength is gone. We will not assert that Cromwell was an immaculate man; that he fell into no faults, no insincerities among the rest. He was no dilettante professor of ‘perfections,’ ‘immaculate conducts.’ He was a rugged Orson, rending his rough way through actual true work,—doubtless with many a fall therein. Insincerities, faults, very many faults 453daily and hourly: it was too well known to him; known to God and him! The Sun was dimmed many a time; but the Sun had not himself grown a Dimness. Cromwell’s last words, as he lay waiting for death, are those of a Christian heroic man. Broken prayers to God, that He would judge him and this Cause, He since man could not, in justice yet in pity. They are most touching words. He breathed out his wild great soul, its toils and sins all ended now, into the presence of his Maker, in this manner.
But regarding Cromwell and his intentions: Hume and many others who agree with him suggest that Cromwell was sincere at first; a genuine ‘Fanatic’ in the beginning, but gradually became a ‘Hypocrite’ as events unfolded around him. This idea of the Fanatic-Hypocrite is Hume’s theory, which has been widely applied since then—to Mahomet and others. Give it some serious thought, and you’ll find some truth in it; not a lot, not everything, far from everything. True, sincere hearts don’t sink in such a miserable way. The Sun releases impurities and gets tainted with spots; but it doesn’t extinguish itself or turn into complete Darkness! I would dare to say that such a downfall never happened to a great, profound Cromwell; I believe, never. Nature’s own lion-hearted Son! Like Antaeus, his strength comes from touching the Earth, his Mother; lift him up from the Earth, lift him up into Hypocrisy and emptiness, and his strength is lost. We won’t claim that Cromwell was a flawless man; that he never made mistakes or displayed insincerity among others. He was not a superficial professor of ‘perfections’ or ‘immaculate behavior.’ He was a rugged individual, carving his way through real work, likely with many a fall along the way. Insincerities, faults, many faults, day by day: he was well aware of them; known to God and himself! The Sun dimmed many times; but the Sun did not become a source of Dimness itself. Cromwell’s last words, as he lay awaiting death, were those of a heroic Christian man. Broken prayers to God, asking Him to judge him and this Cause, since man could not, in justice yet in pity. They are very moving words. He exhaled his wild great soul, all its struggles and sins come to an end, into the presence of his Maker in this way.
I, for one, will not call the man a Hypocrite! Hypocrite, mummer, the life of him a mere theatricality; empty barren quack, hungry for the shouts of mobs? The man had made obscurity do very well for him till his head was gray; and now he was, there as he stood recognised unblamed, the virtual King of England. Cannot a man do without King’s Coaches and Cloaks? Is it such a blessedness to have clerks forever pestering you with bundles of papers in red tape? A simple Diocletian prefers planting of cabbages; a George Washington, no very immeasurable man, does the like. One would say, it is what any genuine man could do; and would do. The instant his real work were out in the matter of Kingship,—away with it!
I, for one, won’t call him a hypocrite! Hypocrite, pretender, his life just a show; empty, barren fraud, craving the cheers of crowds? The guy managed to stay under the radar really well until his hair turned gray; and now he was, as he stood there, recognized and uncriticized, the de facto King of England. Can’t a man get by without royal carriages and fancy clothes? Is it really such a blessing to have clerks constantly bugging you with piles of paperwork? A simple Diocletian would rather grow cabbage; a George Washington, who wasn’t anything extraordinary, would do the same. You could say, it’s something any genuine man could and would do. The moment his true job regarding kingship was over—he’s done!
Let us remark, meanwhile, how indispensable everywhere a King is, in all movements of men. It is strikingly shown, in this very War, what becomes of men when they cannot find a Chief Man, and their enemies can. The Scotch Nation was all but unanimous in Puritanism; zealous and of one mind about it, as in this English end of the Island was far from being the case. But there was no great Cromwell among them; poor tremulous, hesitating, diplomatic Argyles and suchlike; none of them had a heart true enough for the truth, or durst commit himself to the truth. They had no leader; and the scattered Cavalier party in that country had one: Montrose, the noblest of all the Cavaliers; an accomplished, gallant-hearted, splendid man; what one may call the Hero-Cavalier. Well, look at it; on the one hand subjects without a King; on the other a King without subjects! The subjects without King can do nothing; the subjectless 454King can do something. This Montrose, with a handful of Irish or Highland savages, few of them so much as guns in their hands, dashes at the drilled Puritan armies like a wild whirlwind; sweeps them, time after time, some five times over, from the field before him. He was at one period, for a short while, master of all Scotland. One man; but he was a man: a million zealous men, but without the one; they against him were powerless! Perhaps of all the persons in that Puritan struggle, from first to last, the single indispensable one was verily Cromwell. To see and dare, and decide; to be a fixed pillar in the welter of uncertainty;—a King among them, whether they called him so or not.
Let’s note how essential a King is in every group of people. This War clearly shows what happens to people when they can’t find a leader, while their enemies can. The Scottish Nation was almost entirely on board with Puritanism; they were passionate and united about it, which was not the case in this English part of the Island. But they had no great leader like Cromwell; they had only weak, indecisive figures like Argyle, who lacked the courage to fully commit to the truth. Without a leader, the scattered Cavalier faction in that country had one: Montrose, the noblest of the Cavaliers; a charming, brave, and impressive man—a true Hero-Cavalier. Look at the situation: on one side, subjects without a King; on the other, a King without subjects! The subjects without a King can accomplish nothing; the King without subjects can achieve something. Montrose, with just a handful of Irish or Highland warriors—most of them without even guns—charged at the organized Puritan armies like a wild storm, defeating them repeatedly, about five times. For a brief time, he was master of all Scotland. He was one man; they were millions of dedicated men, but without that one man; against him, they were powerless! Perhaps the one truly essential person in that entire Puritan struggle, from start to finish, was Cromwell. He could see, have the courage, and make decisions; he was a steady pillar amid the chaos—a King among those who may not have called him one.
Precisely here, however, lies the rub for Cromwell. His other proceedings have all found advocates, and stand generally justified; but this dismissal of the Rump Parliament and assumption of the Protectorship, is what no one can pardon him. He had fairly grown to be King in England; Chief Man of the victorious party in England: but it seems he could not do without the King’s Cloak, and sold himself to perdition in order to get it. Let us see a little how this was.
Exactly here, however, is the problem for Cromwell. His other actions have all had supporters and are usually defended; but his dismissal of the Rump Parliament and taking on the role of Protector is something that no one can forgive him for. He had pretty much become the King of England; the leading figure of the victorious side in England: but it seems he couldn’t manage without the King's title, and he sacrificed his integrity to obtain it. Let’s take a closer look at how this happened.
England, Scotland, Ireland, all lying now subdued at the feet of the Puritan Parliament, the practical question arose, What was to be done with it? How will you govern these Nations, which Providence in a wondrous way has given-up to your disposal? Clearly those hundred surviving members of the Long Parliament, who sit there as supreme authority, cannot continue for ever to sit. What is to be done?—It was a question which theoretical constitution-builders may find easy to answer; but to Cromwell, looking there into the real practical facts of it, there could be none more complicated. He asked of the Parliament, What it was they would decide upon? It was for the Parliament to say. Yet the Soldiers too, however contrary to Formula, they who had purchased this victory with their blood, it seemed to them that they also should have something to say in it! We will not “For all our fighting have nothing but a little piece of paper.” 455We understand that the Law of God’s Gospel, to which He through us has given the victory, shall establish itself, or try to establish itself, in this land!
England, Scotland, and Ireland are now all subdued at the feet of the Puritan Parliament, and the big question arose: What should be done with it? How will you govern these nations, which Providence has surprisingly placed in your hands? Clearly, the hundred remaining members of the Long Parliament, who act as the supreme authority, can’t continue to sit there forever. What is to be done? Theoretical constitution-makers might find this easy to answer, but for Cromwell, looking at the real practical situation, it was anything but simple. He asked the Parliament what they would decide. It was up to the Parliament to determine that. Yet the soldiers, who had fought and shed blood for this victory, felt they also deserved a say in it! They refused to accept “For all our fighting, we’ll get nothing but a little piece of paper.” 455 We believe that the Law of God’s Gospel, which He has helped us achieve victory through, should establish itself, or at least attempt to do so, in this land!
For three years, Cromwell says, this question had been sounded in the ears of the Parliament. They could make no answer; nothing but talk, talk. Perhaps it lies in the nature of parliamentary bodies; perhaps no Parliament could in such case make any answer but even that of talk, talk! Nevertheless the question must and shall be answered. You sixty men there, becoming fast odious, even despicable, to the whole nation, whom the nation already calls Rump Parliament, you cannot continue to sit there: who or what then is to follow? ‘Free Parliament,’ right of Election, Constitutional Formulas of one sort or the other,—the thing is a hungry Fact coming on us, which we must answer or be devoured by it! And who are you that prate of Constitutional Formulas, rights of Parliament? You have had to kill your King, to make Pride’s Purges, to expel and banish by the law of the stronger whosoever would not let your Cause prosper: there are but fifty or three-score of you left there, debating in these days. Tell us what we shall do; not in the way of Formula, but of practicable Fact!
For three years, Cromwell says, this issue has been echoed in the ears of Parliament. They couldn’t come up with an answer; it was all just talk, talk. Maybe that's just the nature of parliamentary bodies; perhaps no Parliament could respond in any way other than with talk, talk! Still, this question must and will be answered. You sixty men there, becoming increasingly hated, even contemptible, to the whole nation, whom the nation already refers to as the Rump Parliament, you can’t keep sitting there: so what’s next? ‘Free Parliament,’ the right to vote, various Constitutional Formulas—the reality is a pressing issue that we must address or we’ll be consumed by it! And who are you to argue about Constitutional Formulas, the rights of Parliament? You’ve had to execute your King, to carry out Pride’s Purge, to expel and banish anyone who stood in the way of your Cause: there are only fifty or so of you left debating these days. Tell us what we should do; not in terms of Formulas, but of concrete actions!
How they did finally answer, remains obscure to this day. The diligent Godwin himself admits that he cannot make it out. The likeliest is, that this poor Parliament still would not, and indeed could not dissolve and disperse; that when it came to the point of actually dispersing, they again, for the tenth or twentieth time, adjourned it,—and Cromwell’s patience failed him. But we will take the favourablest hypothesis ever started for the Parliament; the favourablest, though I believe it is not the true one, but too favourable.
How they finally responded remains unclear to this day. The diligent Godwin himself admits that he can’t figure it out. The most likely explanation is that this struggling Parliament still wouldn’t, and truly couldn’t, dissolve and disperse; when it actually came time to disband, they once again, for the tenth or twentieth time, postponed it—and Cromwell’s patience ran out. However, let’s consider the most favorable theory ever proposed for the Parliament; the most favorable, although I believe it isn’t the true one, but too positive.
According to this version: At the uttermost crisis, when Cromwell and his Officers were met on the one hand, and the fifty or sixty Rump Members on the other, it was suddenly told Cromwell that the Rump in its despair was answering in a very singular way; that in their splenetic envious despair, to keep-out the army at least, these men were hurrying through the 456House a kind of Reform Bill,—Parliament to be chosen by the whole of England; equable electoral division into districts; free suffrage, and the rest of it! A very questionable, or indeed for them an unquestionable thing. Reform Bill, free suffrage of Englishmen? Why, the Royalists themselves, silenced indeed but not exterminated, perhaps outnumber us; the great numerical majority of England was always indifferent to our Cause, merely looked at it and submitted to it. It is in weight and force, not by counting of heads, that we are the majority! And now with your Formulas and Reform Bills, the whole matter, sorely won by our swords, shall again launch itself to sea; become a mere hope, and likelihood, small even as a likelihood? And it is not a likelihood; it is a certainty, which we have won, by God’s strength and our own right hands, and do now hold here. Cromwell walked down to these refractory Members; interrupted them in that rapid speed of their Reform Bill;—ordered them to begone, and talk there no more.—Can we not forgive him? Can we not understand him? John Milton, who looked on it all near at hand, could applaud him. The Reality had swept the Formulas away before it. I fancy, most men who were realities in England might see into the necessity of that.
According to this version: At the critical moment, when Cromwell and his Officers faced off against about fifty or sixty Rump Members, Cromwell suddenly heard that the Rump, in their desperate state, was reacting in a very unusual way; that in their spiteful envy, to at least keep the army at bay, these men were rushing through the 456House with some kind of Reform Bill—Parliament to be chosen by all of England; fair electoral divisions into districts; universal suffrage, and so on! A highly questionable, or indeed for them an unquestionable proposition. A Reform Bill, free suffrage for Englishmen? Well, the Royalists themselves, silenced but not eradicated, might outnumber us; the vast majority of England was always indifferent to our Cause, just observing it and putting up with it. Our majority is based on strength and influence, not merely headcount! And now, with your Formulas and Reform Bills, the whole matter—which we fought hard for—might just drift away again; become just a hope, and a small one at that? It’s not just a possibility; it’s a certainty that we have secured, by God’s strength and our own hands, and we hold it here. Cromwell approached these unruly Members; interrupted their rapid progress with the Reform Bill;—ordered them to leave and stop talking there.—Can we not forgive him? Can we not understand him? John Milton, who was watching everything up close, could applaud him. The Reality had swept away the Formulas. I think most men who were genuinely involved in England could understand the necessity of that.
The strong daring man, therefore, has set all manner of Formulas and logical superficialities against him; has dared appeal to the genuine fact of this England, Whether it will support him or not? It is curious to see how he struggles to govern in some constitutional way; find some Parliament to support him; but cannot. His first Parliament, the one they call Barebones’s Parliament, is, so to speak, a Convocation of the Notables. From all quarters of England the leading Ministers and chief Puritan Officials nominate the men most distinguished by religious reputation, influence and attachment to the true Cause: these are assembled to shape-out a plan. They sanctioned what was past; shaped as they could what was to come. They were scornfully called Barebones’s Parliament, the man’s name, it seems, was not Barebones, but Barbone,—a good enough man. Nor was it a jest, their work; it 457was a most serious reality,—a trial on the part of these Puritan Notables how far the Law of Christ could become the Law of this England. There were men of sense among them, men of some quality; men of deep piety I suppose the most of them were. They failed, it seems, and broke down, endeavouring to reform the Court of Chancery! They dissolved themselves, as incompetent; delivered-up their power again into the hands of the Lord-General Cromwell, to do with it what he liked and could.
The bold, daring man has faced all sorts of formulas and shallow logic against him; he has bravely appealed to the true state of England, whether it would support him or not. It's interesting to see how he tries to govern in some constitutional manner; he seeks a Parliament to back him but cannot find one. His first Parliament, known as Barebones’s Parliament, is essentially a Convocation of the Notables. From all over England, the top Ministers and main Puritan Officials nominate the most distinguished men based on their religious reputation, influence, and loyalty to the true Cause: these individuals are brought together to formulate a plan. They approved what had happened before; they shaped what could happen next as best they could. They were mockingly called Barebones’s Parliament; the man's name was not actually Barebones, but Barbone—a decent enough person. Their work was no joke; it 457 was a very serious reality—a test by these Puritan Notables to see how far the Law of Christ could be implemented as the Law of this England. There were sensible individuals among them, people of some quality; I suppose most of them were deeply pious. They seemed to have failed and fell short, trying to reform the Court of Chancery! They dissolved themselves, admitting they were not up to the task; they handed their power back to the Lord-General Cromwell, to do with it what he wished and could.
What will he do with it? The Lord-General Cromwell, ‘Commander-in Chief of all the Forces raised and to be raised;’ he hereby sees himself, at this unexampled juncture, as it were the one available Authority left in England, nothing between England and utter Anarchy but him alone. Such is the undeniable Fact of his position and England’s, there and then. What will he do with it? After deliberation, he decides that he will accept it; will formally, with public solemnity, say and vow before God and men, “Yes, the Fact is so, and I will do the best I can with it!” Protectorship, Instrument of Government,—these are the external forms of the thing; worked-out and sanctioned as they could in the circumstances be, by the Judges, by the leading Official people, ‘Council of Officers and Persons of interest in the Nation:’ and as for the thing itself, undeniably enough, at the pass matters had now come to, there was no alternative but Anarchy or that. Puritan England might accept it or not; but Puritan England was, in real truth, saved from suicide thereby!—I believe the Puritan People did, in an inarticulate, grumbling, yet on the whole grateful and real way, accept this anomalous act of Oliver’s; at least, he and they together made it good, and always better to the last. But in their Parliamentary articulate way, they had their difficulties, and never knew fully what to say to it!—
What will he do with it? Lord-General Cromwell, ‘Commander-in-Chief of all the Forces raised and to be raised;’ sees himself, at this unprecedented moment, as the only authority left in England, standing between the nation and complete chaos. This is the undeniable reality of his position and England’s at that time. What will he do with it? After some thought, he decides that he will accept it; he will formally, with public seriousness, say and vow before God and everyone, “Yes, this is true, and I will do the best I can with it!” Protectorship, Instrument of Government—these are the formal titles of the role; put together and approved as well as possible under the circumstances by the judges, the leading officials, and the ‘Council of Officers and People of interest in the Nation.’ And undeniably, given how far things had progressed, there was no choice but Anarchy or this solution. Puritan England could accept it or not; but the truth is, it was saved from self-destruction by this!—I believe the Puritan people did, in a vague, grumbling, but overall thankful and genuine way, accept this unusual action of Oliver’s; at least, he and they together made it work, and continually improved it until the end. But in their Parliamentary articulate way, they faced challenges and never fully knew how to address it!—
Oliver’s second Parliament, properly his first regular Parliament, chosen by the rule laid-down in the Instrument of Government, did assemble, and worked;—but got, before long, into bottomless questions as to the Protector’s right, as to ‘usurpation,’ and so forth; and 458had at the earliest legal day to be dismissed. Cromwell’s concluding Speech to these men is a remarkable one. So likewise to his third Parliament, in similar rebuke for their pedantries and obstinacies. Most rude, chaotic, all these Speeches are; but most earnest-looking. You would say, it was a sincere helpless man; not used to speak the great inorganic thought of him, but to act it rather! A helplessness of utterance, in such bursting fulness of meaning. He talks much about ‘births of Providence:’ All these changes, so many victories and events, were not forethoughts, and theatrical contrivances of men, of me or of men; it is blind blasphemers that will persist in calling them so! He insists with a heavy sulphurous wrathful emphasis on this. As he well might. As if a Cromwell in that dark huge game he had been playing, the world wholly thrown into chaos round him, had foreseen it all, and played it all off like a precontrived puppetshow by wood and wire! These things were foreseen by no man, he says; no man could tell what a day would bring forth: they were ‘births of Providence,’ God’s finger guided us on, and we came at last to clear height of victory, God’s Cause triumphant in these Nations; and you as a Parliament could assemble together, and say in what manner all this could be organised, reduced into rational feasibility among the affairs of men. You were to help with your wise counsel in doing that. “You have had such an opportunity as no Parliament in England ever had.” Christ’s Law, the Right and True, was to be in some measure made the Law of this land. In place of that, you have got into your idle pedantries, constitutionalities, bottomless cavillings and questionings about written laws for my coming here;—and would send the whole matter into Chaos again, because I have no Notary’s parchment, but only God’s voice from the battle-whirlwind, for being President among you! That opportunity is gone; and we know not when it will return. You have had your constitutional Logic; and Mammon’s Law, not Christ’s Law, rules yet in this land. “God be judge between you and me!” These are his final words to them: Take you your constitution-formulas in your hand; and I 459my informal struggles, purposes, realities and acts; and “God be judge between you and me!”—
Oliver’s second Parliament, really his first official Parliament, which was chosen according to the guidelines in the Instrument of Government, did gather and function;—but soon got stuck in endless debates about the Protector’s right, about ‘usurpation,’ and the like; and 458had to be dismissed at the earliest legal opportunity. Cromwell’s final Speech to these men is quite notable. Similarly, to his third Parliament, he gave a comparable reprimand for their tediousness and stubbornness. All these Speeches are rather rough and chaotic; but they appear deeply earnest. You’d think it was a sincerely helpless individual; not accustomed to speak the expansive inorganic thoughts of himself, but to act on them instead! There’s a sense of helplessness in his words, overflowing with meaning. He frequently mentions ‘births of Providence:’ All these changes, numerous victories and events, weren’t premeditated or theatrical tricks of people, of me or anyone else; it’s blind blasphemers who keep insisting otherwise! He emphasizes this with a heavy, wrathful tone. As he rightly should. As if a Cromwell, amid that large, dark game he had been partaking in, with the world completely chaotic around him, had foreseen everything and orchestrated it like a planned puppet show with wood and strings! No man, he asserts, foresaw these things; no one could predict what a day would bring: they were ‘births of Providence,’ guided by God’s hand, leading us to a clear victory, with God’s Cause triumphant in these Nations; and you as a Parliament should gather and decide on how all this could be organized, made rationally feasible among human affairs. You were meant to assist with your wise counsel in that task. “You’ve been given an opportunity no Parliament in England has ever had.” Christ’s Law, the Right and True, was supposed to become somewhat the Law of this country. Instead, you’ve fallen into your trivial details, constitutional formalities, endless nitpicking, and debates about written laws regarding my presence here;—and would throw the entire matter back into Chaos, because I don’t have a Notary’s parchment, only God’s voice from the battle whirlwind, for being your leader! That opportunity is lost; we have no idea when it will come back. You’ve had your constitutional Logic; and Mammon’s Law, not Christ’s Law, still governs this land. “God be judge between you and me!” These are his final words to them: Take your constitutional formulas in your hand; and I 459my informal struggles, intentions, realities, and actions; and “God be judge between you and me!”—
We said above what shapeless, involved chaotic things the printed Speeches of Cromwell are. Wilfully ambiguous, unintelligible, say the most: a hypocrite shrouding himself in confused Jesuitic jargon! To me they do not seem so. I will say rather, they afforded the first glimpses I could ever get into the reality of this Cromwell, nay into the possibility of him. Try to believe that he means something, search lovingly what that may be: you will find a real speech lying imprisoned in these broken rude tortuous utterances; a meaning in the great heart of this inarticulate man! You will, for the first time, begin to see that he was a man; not an enigmatic chimera, unintelligible to you, incredible to you. The Histories and Biographies written of this Cromwell, written in shallow sceptical generations that could not know or conceive of a deep believing man, are far more obscure than Cromwell’s Speeches. You look through them only into the infinite vague of Black and the Inane. ‘Heats and Jealousies,’ says Lord Clarendon himself: ‘heats and jealousies,’ mere crabbed whims, theories and crochets; these induced slow sober quiet Englishmen to lay down their ploughs and work; and fly into red fury of confused war against the best-conditioned of Kings! Try if you can find that true. Scepticism writing about Belief may have great gifts; but it is really ultra vires there. It is Blindness laying-down the Laws of Optics.—
We mentioned earlier how messy and chaotic the printed speeches of Cromwell are. Deliberately vague, confusing—some say he’s a hypocrite hiding behind complicated Jesuit jargon! But to me, they don’t come across that way. Instead, I think they provide the first real insights I’ve had into who Cromwell truly was, or even the possibility of who he could be. If you try to believe that he means something, and look for what that might be with an open heart, you’ll discover a genuine speech trapped within these jagged and convoluted expressions; there’s meaning in the core of this inarticulate man! For the first time, you’ll start to see that he was a real person, not just an obscure enigma that you can’t understand. The histories and biographies written about Cromwell, crafted by shallow, skeptical generations that couldn’t comprehend or appreciate a deeply believing individual, are far more obscure than Cromwell’s speeches. When you read them, you only glimpse the endless void of the black and the meaningless. ‘Heats and Jealousies,’ as Lord Clarendon himself says: ‘heats and jealousies,’ mere sour tempers, theories, and eccentricities; these compelled calm, rational Englishmen to abandon their plows and engage in a furious, chaotic war against one of the best kings! Try to see if you can find that to be true. Skepticism writing about belief may have a lot of skill, but it truly is ultra vires in that context. It’s like blindness trying to set the rules of optics.—
Cromwell’s third Parliament split on the same rock as his second. Ever the constitutional Formula: How came you there? Show us some Notary parchment! Blind pedants:—“Why, surely the same power which makes you a Parliament, that, and something more, made me a Protector!” If my Protectorship is nothing, what in the name of wonder is your Parliamenteership, a reflex and creation of that?—
Cromwell’s third Parliament hit a dead end just like his second. The same constitutional question arose: How did you get there? Show us some official documents! Blind fools: “Well, obviously the same power that makes you a Parliament, and even more, made me a Protector!” If my Protectorship means nothing, then what on earth does your Parliamenteership mean, which is just a reflection and product of that?
Parliaments having failed, there remained nothing but the way of Despotism. Military Dictators, each with his district, to coerce the Royalists and other gainsayers, to govern them, if not by act of Parliament, then by the sword. Formula shall not carry it, while 460the Reality is here! I will go on, protecting oppressed Protestants abroad, appointing just judges, wise managers, at home, cherishing true Gospel ministers; doing the best I can to make England a Christian England, greater than old Rome, the Queen of Protestant Christianity; I, since you will not help me; I while God leaves me life!—Why did he not give it up; retire into obscurity again, since the Law would not acknowledge him? cry several. That is where they mistake. For him there was no giving of it up! Prime Ministers have governed countries, Pitt, Pombal, Choiseul; and their word was a law while it held: but this Prime Minister was one that could not get resigned. Let him once resign, Charles Stuart and the Cavaliers waited to kill him; to kill the Cause and him. Once embarked, there is no retreat, no return. This Prime Minister could retire nowhither except into his tomb.
Parliaments having failed, the only option left was Despotism. Military Dictators, each in charge of their own area, to coerce the Royalists and anyone else who disagreed, to control them, if not through Parliament, then by force. Rules won’t matter while 460 the reality is here! I will continue to protect oppressed Protestants abroad, appoint fair judges, wise leaders at home, and support true Gospel ministers; doing everything I can to make England a Christian nation, greater than old Rome, the center of Protestant Christianity; I, since you will not assist me; I while God gives me life!—Why didn’t he just give up and fade away into obscurity when the Law wouldn’t recognize him? some say. That’s where they’re wrong. For him, there was no giving up! Prime Ministers have ruled countries, Pitt, Pombal, Choiseul; and their words were law while they held power: but this Prime Minister was one who could not resign. If he ever resigned, Charles Stuart and the Cavaliers were waiting to kill him; to destroy the Cause and him. Once committed, there’s no way back, no turning around. This Prime Minister could retire nowhere but to his grave.
One is sorry for Cromwell in his old days. His complaint is incessant of the heavy burden Providence has laid on him. Heavy; which he must bear till death. Old Colonel Hutchinson, as his wife relates it, Hutchinson, his old battle-mate, coming to see him on some indispensable business, much against his will,—Cromwell ‘follows him to the door,’ in a most fraternal, domestic, conciliatory style; begs that he would be reconciled to him, his old brother in arms; says how much it grieves him to be misunderstood, deserted by true fellow-soldiers, dear to him from of old: the rigorous Hutchinson, cased in his republican formula, sullenly goes his way.—And the man’s head now white; his strong arm growing weary with its long work! I think always too of his poor Mother, now very old, living in that Palace of his; a right brave woman: as indeed they lived all an honest God-fearing Household there: if she heard a shot go off, she thought it was her son killed. He had to come to her at least once a day, that she might see with her own eyes that he was yet living. The poor old Mother!——What had this man gained; what had he gained? He had a life of sore strife and toil, to his last day. Fame, ambition, place in History? His dead body was hung in chains; his ‘place in History,’—place in History forsooth!—has 461been a place of ignominy, accusation, blackness and disgrace; and here, this day, who knows if it is not rash in me to be among the first that ever ventured to pronounce him not a knave and a liar, but a genuinely honest man! Peace to him. Did he not, in spite of all, accomplish much for us? We walk smoothly over his great rough heroic life; step-over his body sunk in the ditch there. We need not spurn it, as we step on it!—Let the Hero rest. It was not to men’s judgment that he appealed; nor have men judged him very well.
One feels sorry for Cromwell in his old age. He constantly complains about the heavy burden that Providence has placed on him. A heavy burden that he must bear until death. Old Colonel Hutchinson, as his wife recounts, visits him on some urgent matter, much against his will. Cromwell “follows him to the door” in a very brotherly, friendly, and conciliatory manner; he asks Hutchinson to reconcile with him, his old comrade in arms; he expresses how much it pains him to be misunderstood and abandoned by true fellow-soldiers, whom he has cherished for so long. The stern Hutchinson, stuck in his republican principles, reluctantly goes on his way. And here is a man with gray hair now; his strong arm growing tired from all its long work! I always think too of his poor mother, now very old, living in that Palace of his; a truly brave woman. They all lived an honest, God-fearing household there: if she heard a gunshot, she feared it was her son who had been killed. He had to visit her at least once a day so she could see with her own eyes that he was still alive. The poor old mother!——What had this man achieved; what had he achieved? He lived a life of great struggle and toil, until his last day. Fame, ambition, a place in History? His dead body was hung in chains; his “place in History”—a place in History, for sure!—has turned out to be a place of shame, accusation, darkness, and disgrace; and here, today, who knows if it’s too bold of me to be among the first to declare him not a knave or a liar, but genuinely an honest man! Peace to him. Did he not, despite everything, accomplish much for us? We pass smoothly over his great, rough, heroic life; we step over his body sunk in the ditch there. We need not spurn it as we step on it!—Let the Hero rest. He did not appeal to men’s judgment; nor have men judged him very well.
Precisely a century and a year after this of Puritanism had got itself hushed-up into decent composure, and its results made smooth in 1688, there broke-out a far deeper explosion, much more difficult to hush-up, known to all mortals, and like to be long known, by the name of French Revolution. It is properly the third and final act of Protestantism; the explosive confused return of Mankind to Reality and Fact, now that they were perishing of Semblance and Sham. We call our English Puritanism the second act: “Well then, the Bible is true; let us go by the Bible!” “In Church,” said Luther; “In Church and State,” said Cromwell, “let us go by what actually is God’s Truth.” Men have to return to reality; they cannot live on semblance. The French Revolution, or third act, we may well call the final one; for lower than that savage Sansculottism men cannot go. They stand there on the nakedest haggard Fact, undeniable in all seasons and circumstances; and may and must begin again confidently to build-up from that. The French explosion, like the English one, got its King,—who had no Notary parchment to show for himself. We have still to glance for a moment at Napoleon, our second modern King.
Exactly a hundred and one years after Puritanism had quieted down into a respectable silence, and its effects were smoothed over in 1688, a much bigger upheaval erupted, one that was far harder to ignore, known to everyone and likely to be remembered for a long time as the French Revolution. This event is actually the third and final chapter of Protestantism; it signifies the chaotic yet essential return of humanity to Reality and Fact, especially as they were dying from Illusion and Pretense. We refer to our English Puritanism as the second chapter: “Well then, the Bible is true; let’s follow the Bible!” “In Church,” said Luther; “In Church and State,” said Cromwell, “let’s adhere to what is truly God’s Truth.” People have to reconnect with reality; they can’t survive on illusions. The French Revolution, or third chapter, can rightly be called the final one; because humanity cannot sink lower than that brutal Sansculottism. They stand there confronting the raw, undeniable Fact, consistent in all times and situations; and they can and must start over confidently from there. Like the English upheaval, the French revolution also took down its King—who had no legal documents to defend his position. We still need to take a brief look at Napoleon, our second modern King.
Napoleon does by no means seem to me so great a man as Cromwell. His enormous victories which reached over all Europe, while Cromwell abode mainly in our little England, are but as the high stilts on which the man is seen standing; the stature of the man is not altered thereby. I find in him no such sincerity as In Cromwell; only a far inferior sort. No silent walking, 462through long years, with the Awful Unnamable of this Universe; ‘walking with God,’ as he called it; and faith and strength in that alone: latent thought and valour, content to lie latent, then burst out as in blaze of Heaven’s lightning! Napoleon lived in an age when God was no longer believed; the meaning of all Silence, Latency, was thought to be Nonentity: he had to begin not out of the Puritan Bible, but out of poor Sceptical Encyclopédies. This was the length the man carried it. Meritorious to get so far. His compact, prompt, everyway articulate character is in itself perhaps small, compared with our great chaotic inarticulate Cromwell’s. Instead of ‘dumb Prophet struggling to speak,’ we have a portentous mixture of the Quack withal! Hume’s notion of the Fanatic-Hypocrite, with such truth as it has, will apply much better to Napoleon than it did to Cromwell, to Mahomet or the like,—where indeed taken strictly it has hardly any truth at all. An element of blamable ambition shows itself, from the first, in this man; gets the victory over him at last, and involves him and his work in ruin.
Napoleon doesn't seem to me to be as great a man as Cromwell. His massive victories across Europe, while Cromwell mostly stayed in England, are just like the tall stilts that make him appear taller; they don’t change his true stature. I see no sincerity in him like I do in Cromwell; it's of a much lesser kind. There’s no silent journey, 462 through the long years, with the Awful Unnamable of this Universe; ‘walking with God,’ as he described it; relying solely on faith and strength in that connection: latent thought and courage, content to remain hidden before exploding like a flash of Heaven’s lightning! Napoleon lived in a time when God was no longer believed in; the meaning of all Silence and Latency was thought to be Nonentity: he had to originate not from the Puritan Bible, but from skeptical Encyclopédies. This was as far as he could take it. It's commendable to get that far. His compact, prompt, and articulate nature may seem small compared to our grand, chaotic, inarticulate Cromwell. Instead of a ‘dumb Prophet struggling to speak,’ we get a daunting mix of a Quack! Hume’s idea of the Fanatic-Hypocrite, with whatever truth it may have, fits Napoleon much better than it did Cromwell, Mahomet, or the like—where, in fact, if examined closely, it holds very little truth at all. From the start, an element of blameworthy ambition emerges in this man; it ultimately conquers him and leads to his downfall and the ruin of his legacy.
‘False as a bulletin’ became a proverb in Napoleon’s time. He makes what excuse he could for it: that it was necessary to mislead the enemy, to keep up his own men’s courage, and so forth. On the whole, there are no excuses. A man in no case has liberty to tell lies. It had been, in the long-run, better for Napoleon too if he had not told any. In fact, if a man have any purpose reaching beyond the hour and day, meant to be found extant next day, what good can it ever be to promulgate lies? The lies are found-out; ruinous penalty is exacted for them. No man will believe the liar next time even when he speaks truth, when it is of the last importance that he be believed. The old cry of wolf!—A Lie is no-thing; you cannot of nothing make something; you make nothing at last, and lose your labour into the bargain.
‘False as a bulletin’ became a proverb in Napoleon’s time. He made whatever excuse he could for it: that it was necessary to mislead the enemy, to keep up his own men’s morale, and so on. Overall, there are no good reasons. A person never has the right to tell lies. In the long run, it would have been better for Napoleon if he had told none. In fact, if someone has a goal that extends beyond the hour and day, meant to be around the next day, what good does it do to spread lies? The lies are exposed; severe consequences result from them. No one will trust the liar next time even when he tells the truth, especially when it’s crucial that he be believed. The old cry of wolf!—A lie is nothing; you cannot create something from nothing; you end up with nothing and waste your efforts in the process.
Yet Napoleon had a sincerity; we are to distinguish between what is superficial and what is fundamental in insincerity. Across these outer man[oe]uvrings and quackeries of his, which were many and most blamable, 463let us discern withal that the man had a certain instinctive ineradicable feeling for reality; and did base himself upon fact, so long as he had any basis. He has an instinct of Nature better than his culture was. His savans, Bourrienne tells us, in that voyage to Egypt were one evening busily occupied arguing that there could be no God. They had proved it, to their satisfaction, by all manner of logic. Napoleon looking up into the stars, answers, “Very ingenious, Messieurs: but who made all that?” The Atheistic logic runs-off from him like water; the great Fact stares him in the face: “Who made all that?” So too in Practice: he, as every man that can be great, or have victory in this world, sees, through all entanglements, the practical heart of the matter; drives straight towards that. When the steward of his Tuileries Palace was exhibiting the new upholstery, with praises, and demonstration how glorious it was, and how cheap withal, Napoleon, making little answer, asked for a pair of scissors, clipt one of the gold tassels from a window-curtain, put it in his pocket, and walked on. Some days afterwards, he produced it at the right moment, to the horror of his upholstery functionary; it was not gold but tinsel! In Saint Helena, it is notable how he still, to his last days, insists on the practical, the real. “Why talk and complain; above all, why quarrel with one another? There is no result in it; it comes to nothing that one can do. Say nothing, if one can do nothing!” He speaks often so, to his poor discontented followers; he is like a piece of silent strength in the middle of their morbid querulousness there.
Yet Napoleon had sincerity; we need to differentiate between what is superficial and what is fundamental in insincerity. Amidst his many outer maneuvers and deceptions, which were numerous and quite blameworthy, 463 we can see that the man possessed an instinctive and deep-seated connection to reality; he grounded himself in fact, as long as he had a basis for it. His instinct for Nature was better than his education. His savans, as Bourrienne tells us, during that voyage to Egypt, were one evening deeply engaged in arguing that there could be no God. They had convinced themselves of it through all sorts of reasoning. Looking up at the stars, Napoleon responded, “Very clever, gentlemen: but who made all that?” Atheistic logic washed off him like water; the great Fact confronted him: “Who made all that?” Similarly in practice: he, like anyone who can be great or achieve victory in this world, saw through all the complications to the practical heart of the matter; he aimed straight for that. When the steward of his Tuileries Palace was showing off the new upholstery, praising it and demonstrating how magnificent and inexpensive it was, Napoleon, giving little response, asked for a pair of scissors, snipped one of the gold tassels from a window curtain, put it in his pocket, and moved on. A few days later, he revealed it at the right moment, to the shock of his upholstery manager; it turned out to be tinsel, not gold! In Saint Helena, it's notable how he still, up until his last days, emphasized the practical and the real. “Why talk and complain; above all, why argue with each other? There is no result in it; it amounts to nothing that one can do. Say nothing if one can do nothing!” He often spoke this way to his unhappy followers; he was like a source of silent strength amidst their morbid complaints there.
And accordingly was there not what we can call a faith in him, genuine so far as it went? That this new enormous Democracy asserting itself here in the French Revolution is an insuppressible Fact, which the whole world, with its old forces and institutions cannot put down; this was a true insight of his, and took his conscience and enthusiasm along with it,—a faith. And did he not interpret the dim purport of it well? ‘La carrière ouverte aux talens, The implements to him who can handle them:’ this actually is the truth, and even the whole truth; it includes whatever the French 464Revolution, or any Revolution, could mean. Napoleon, in his first period, was a true Democrat. And yet by the nature of him, fostered too by his military trade, he knew that Democracy, if it were a true thing at all could not be an anarchy: the man had a heart-hatred for anarchy. On that Twentieth of June (1792), Bourrienne and he sat in a coffee-house, as the mob rolled by: Napoleon expresses the deepest contempt for persons in authority that they do not restrain this rabble. On the Tenth of August he wonders why there is no man to command these poor Swiss; they would conquer if there were. Such a faith in Democracy, yet hatred of Anarchy, it is that carries Napoleon through all his great work. Through his brilliant Italian Campaigns, onwards to the Peace of Leoben, one would say, his inspiration is: ‘Triumph to the French Revolution; assertion of it against these Austrian Simulacra that pretend to call it a Simulacrum!’ Withal, however, he feels, and has a right to feel, how necessary a strong Authority is; how the Revolution cannot prosper or last without such. To bridle-in that great devouring, self-devouring French Revolution; to tame it, so that its intrinsic purpose can be made good, that it may become organic, and be able to live among other organisms and formed things, not as a wasting destruction alone: is not this still what he partly aimed at, as the true purport of his life; nay what he actually managed to do? Through Wagrams, Austerlitzes; triumph after triumph,—he triumphed so far. There was an eye to see in this man, a soul to dare and do. He rose naturally to be the King. All men saw that he was such. The common soldiers used to say on the march: “These babbling Avocats, up at Paris; all talk and no work! What wonder it runs all wrong? We shall have to go and put our Petit Caporal there!” They went, and put him there; they and France at large. Chief-consulship, Emperorship, victory over Europe;—till the poor Lieutenant of La Fère, not unnaturally, might seem to himself the greatest of all men that had been in the world for some ages.
And wasn't there something we can call a faith in him, genuine as far as it went? The new enormous Democracy making its presence felt during the French Revolution is an unstoppable fact, one that all the old forces and institutions in the world cannot suppress; this was a true insight of his, and it stirred his conscience and enthusiasm — a faith. And didn’t he interpret its vague meaning well? ‘La carrière ouverte aux talens, The tools for those who know how to use them:’ this really is the truth, and even the whole truth; it encompasses everything the French 464 Revolution, or any Revolution, could signify. Napoleon, in his early days, was a true Democrat. Yet, by his nature, enhanced by his military background, he understood that Democracy, if it were genuine at all, could not be anarchy: he had a deep-seated hatred for anarchy. On that Twentieth of June (1792), Bourrienne and he were sitting in a coffeehouse as the crowd surged by: Napoleon expressed deep contempt for the authorities for not controlling this mob. On the Tenth of August, he wondered why no one was there to lead these poor Swiss; they would prevail if only there were. Such a belief in Democracy, yet a hatred for Anarchy, is what propelled Napoleon through all his great achievements. From his brilliant Italian Campaigns to the Peace of Leoben, one might say his motivation was: ‘Victory for the French Revolution; an affirmation of it against these Austrian puppets pretending it’s all a façade!’ However, he also felt — and had every right to feel — how essential a strong Authority is; how the Revolution can’t thrive or endure without it. To rein in that vast, ravenous, self-destructive French Revolution; to tame it, so that its true purpose can be fulfilled, allowing it to become organic and exist alongside other structures and formed entities, not just as a force of devastation: isn’t this still part of what he aimed for as the true meaning of his life — indeed, what he actually achieved? Through Wagrams, Austerlitzes; triumph after triumph — he succeeded to this extent. This man had a vision and a soul to act boldly. He naturally rose to be the King. Everyone could see that he was one. The ordinary soldiers used to say on the march: “These talkative Avocats in Paris; all talk and no action! What a surprise everything's going wrong! We need to put our Petit Caporal in charge!” They went and put him there; they and France as a whole. Chief consul, Emperor, victories over Europe; — until the poor Lieutenant of La Fère, not unreasonably, might consider himself the greatest man in the world for some ages.
But at this point, I think, the fatal charlatan-element got the upper hand. He apostatised from his old Faith 465in Facts: took to believing in Semblances; strove to connect himself with Austrian Dynasties, Popedoms, with the old false Feudalities which he once saw clearly to be false;—considered that he would found “his Dynasty” and so forth; that the enormous French Revolution meant only that! The man was ‘given-up to strong delusion, that he should believe a lie;’ a fearful but most sure thing. He did not know true from false now when he looked at them,—the fearfulest penalty a man pays for yielding to untruth of heart. Self and false ambition had now become his god: self-deception once yielded to, all other deceptions follow naturally more and more. What a paltry patch-work of theatrical paper-mantles, tinsel and mummery, had this man wrapt his own great reality in, thinking to make it more real thereby! His hollow Pope’s-Concordat, pretending to be a re-establishment of Catholicism, felt by himself to be the method of extirpating it, “la vaccine de la religion:” his ceremonial Coronations, consecrations by the old Italian Chimera in Notre-Dame,—“wanting nothing to complete the pomp of it,” as Augereau said, “nothing but the half-million of men who had died to put an end to all that”! Cromwell’s Inauguration was by the Sword and Bible; what we must call a genuinely true one. Sword and Bible were borne before him, without any chimera: were not these the real emblems of Puritanism; its true decoration and insignia? It had used them both in a very real manner, and pretended to stand by them now! But this poor Napoleon mistook: he believed too much in the Dupeability of men; saw no fact deeper in men than Hunger and this! He was mistaken. Like a man that should build upon cloud; his house and he fall down in confused wreck, and depart out of the world.
But at this point, I think, the destructive charlatan side took control. He turned away from his old beliefs and started believing in appearances; he tried to connect himself with Austrian dynasties, the papacy, and the outdated false feudalities he once clearly recognized as untrue—he thought he would establish “his dynasty” and so on; that the massive French Revolution meant nothing else! The man was given over to a strong delusion that he should believe a lie; a terrible but very certain reality. He couldn’t tell true from false anymore when he looked at them—the worst penalty a person pays for giving in to the untruth within. His own self and false ambitions had now become his god: once he allowed self-deception, all other deceptions naturally followed more and more. What a pathetic patchwork of theatrical facades, glitter, and nonsense had this man wrapped his own great reality in, thinking it would make it more real! His hollow Concordat with the Pope, pretending to be a restoration of Catholicism, he felt was a way of eradicating it, “the vaccine of religion:” his ceremonial coronations, consecrated by the old Italian illusion in Notre-Dame—“lacking only one thing to complete the pomp,” as Augereau said, “the half-million men who had died to put an end to all that”! Cromwell’s inauguration was by the Sword and Bible; what we must call a genuinely true one. Sword and Bible were carried before him without any illusions: were not these the real emblems of Puritanism, its true decoration and insignia? It had used them both in a very real way and claimed to stand by them now! But this poor Napoleon was mistaken: he believed too much in the gullibility of people; saw no deeper truth in humanity than hunger and this! He was wrong. Like a man who builds on clouds; his house and he come crashing down in a confused wreck, vanishing from the world.
Alas, in all of us this charlatan-element exists; and might be developed, were the temptation strong enough. ‘Lead us not into temptation’! But it is fatal, I say, that it be developed. The thing into which it enters as a cognisable ingredient is doomed to be altogether transitory; and, however huge it may look, is in itself small. Napoleon’s working, accordingly, what was it with all the noise it made? A flash as of gunpowder 466wide-spread; a blazing-up as of dry heath. For an hour the whole Universe seems wrapt in smoke and flame; but only for an hour. It goes out: the Universe with its old mountains and streams, its stars above and kind soil beneath, is still there.
Unfortunately, we all have this element of deception within us; and it could be developed if the temptation were strong enough. “Lead us not into temptation!” But it is deadly, I say, that it gets developed. Anything that includes this as a noticeable part is destined to be completely temporary; and no matter how big it may seem, it is in essence small. Napoleon’s actions—what were they amidst all the noise they created? A flash like gunpowder that spreads wide; a flare-up like dry brush. For an hour, the whole Universe seems enveloped in smoke and flames; but only for an hour. It fades away: the Universe with its old mountains and streams, its stars above and fertile ground beneath, is still there.
The Duke of Weimar told his friends always, To be of courage; this Napoleonism was unjust, a falsehood, and could not last. It is true doctrine. The heavier this Napoleon trampled on the world, holding it tyrannously down, the fiercer would the world’s recoil against him be, one day. Injustice pays itself with frightful compound-interest. I am not sure but he had better have lost his best park of artillery, or had his best regiment drowned in the sea, than shot that poor German Bookseller, Palm! It was a palpable tyrannous murderous injustice, which no man, let him paint an inch thick, could make-out to be other. It burnt deep into the hearts of men, it and the like of it; suppressed fire flashed in the eyes of men, as they thought of it,—waiting their day! Which day came: Germany rose round him.—What Napoleon did will in the long-run amount to what he did justly; what Nature with her laws will sanction. To what of reality was in him; to that and nothing more. The rest was all smoke and waste. La carrière ouverte aux talens: that great true Message, which has yet to articulate and fulfil itself everywhere, he left in a most inarticulate state. He was a great ébauche, a rude-draught never completed; as indeed what great man is other? Left in too rude a state, alas!
The Duke of Weimar often told his friends to be brave; this Napoleonism was unjust, a falsehood, and would not last. It's a true principle. The more this Napoleon crushed the world, tyrannizing over it, the stronger the world's backlash against him would be one day. Injustice comes with terrifying compound interest. I’m not sure he wouldn’t have been better off losing his best artillery or having his best regiment drowned at sea than executing that poor German bookseller, Palm! It was a blatant, tyrannical, murderous injustice that no one could, no matter how they tried to justify it, see as anything else. It burned deeply into people's hearts, and similar acts ignited suppressed fury in their eyes as they thought about it—waiting for their moment! That moment came: Germany rose up around him. What Napoleon did will ultimately amount to what he did rightly; it will be validated by Nature and her laws. What reality existed in him corresponds only to that, and nothing more. The rest was just smoke and waste. La carrière ouverte aux talents: that great, true message, which still needs to be expressed and fulfilled everywhere, he left in a very unclear state. He was a great ébauche, a rough draft that was never completed; indeed, what great man is not? Left in too rough a state, alas!
His notions of the world, as he expresses them there at St. Helena, are almost tragical to consider. He seems to feel the most unaffected surprise that it has all gone so; that he is flung-out on the rock here, and the World is still moving on its axis. France is great, and all-great; and at bottom, he is France. England itself, he says, is by Nature only an appendage of France; “another Isle of Oleron to France.” So it was by Nature, by Napoleon-Nature; and yet look how in fact,—Here am I! He cannot understand it: inconceivable that the reality has not corresponded to his program of it; that France was not all-great, that he 467was not France. ‘Strong delusion,’ that he should believe the thing to be which is not! The compact, clear-seeing, decisive Italian nature of him, strong, genuine, which he once had, has enveloped itself, half-dissolved itself, in a turbid atmosphere of French fanfaronade. The world was not disposed to be trodden-down underfoot; to be bound into masses, and built together, as he liked, for a pedestal to France and him: the world had quite other purposes in view! Napoleon’s astonishment is extreme. But alas, what help now? He had gone that way of his; and Nature also had gone her way. Having once parted with Reality, he tumbles helpless in Vacuity; no rescue for him. He had to sink there, mournfully as man seldom did; and break his great heart, and die,—this poor Napoleon: a great implement too soon wasted, till it was useless: our last Great Man!
His views on the world, as he shares them at St. Helena, are almost tragic to think about. He seems genuinely surprised that everything has turned out this way; that he’s stuck on this lonely rock while the world keeps spinning. France is powerful and, in essence, he embodies France. He claims that England is naturally just an extension of France; “another Isle of Oleron for France.” So it was by nature, by the nature of Napoleon; and yet, look at the reality—Here I am! He struggles to grasp it: it’s unimaginable that reality hasn’t matched his vision; that France wasn’t all-powerful and that he 467 wasn’t France. ‘What a strong delusion it is for him to believe in something that isn't real!’ The cohesive, clear-sighted, and decisive Italian character he once had has become clouded, half-dissolved in a murky atmosphere of French bravado. The world wasn't meant to be crushed underfoot, forced into masses, or assembled as he wished to create a pedestal for France and himself; the world had entirely different goals! Napoleon’s astonishment is profound. But alas, what good is that now? He chose his path, and nature took its own course. Once he lost touch with reality, he fell helplessly into emptiness; there was no saving him. He had to fall into despair as few men have; to break his massive heart and die—this poor Napoleon: a great tool wasted too soon, rendered useless: our last Great Man!
Our last, in a double sense. For here finally these wide roamings of ours through so many times and places, in search and study of Heroes, are to terminate. I am sorry for it: there was pleasure for me in this business, if also much pain. It is a great subject, and a most grave and wide one, this which, not to be too grave about it, I have named Hero-worship. It enters deeply, as I think, into the secret of Mankind’s ways and vitalest interests in this world, and is well worth explaining at present. With six months, instead of six days, we might have done better. I promised to break-ground on it; I know not whether I have even managed to do that. I have had to tear it up in the rudest manner in order to get into it at all. Often enough, with these abrupt utterances thrown-out isolated, unexplained, has your tolerance been put to the trial. Tolerance, patient candour, all-hoping favour and kindness, which I will not speak of at present. The accomplished and distinguished, the beautiful, the wise, something of what is best in England, have listened patiently to my rude words. With many feelings, I heartily thank you all; and say, Good be with you all!
Our final one, in more ways than one. For here, at last, these wide-ranging explorations of ours through so many times and places, in search of and studying Heroes, are coming to an end. I regret this: there was enjoyment for me in this journey, even if it came with a lot of struggle. It’s a profound topic, and a very serious and broad one, this which, to lighten the mood a bit, I have called Hero-worship. It goes deep into the core of humanity’s behavior and essential interests in this world, and it deserves to be discussed right now. With six months, instead of six days, we could have done a much better job. I promised to start the conversation; I’m not sure if I even managed to accomplish that. I had to tear it apart in the most abrupt way just to dive into it at all. Often enough, with these sudden statements thrown out isolated and unexplained, your patience has been put to the test. Patience, open-mindedness, all-hopeful goodwill and kindness, which I won't mention right now. The accomplished, the distinguished, the beautiful, the wise, some of the best in England, have listened patiently to my blunt words. With many emotions, I sincerely thank you all; and say, may you all be well!
INDEX
- Abdallah, father of Mahomet, 286
- Abelard, theology of, 389
- Abu Thaleb, uncle of Mahomet, 286, 387, 294
- Action the true end of Man, 119, 121
- Actual, the, the true Ideal, 148, 149
- Adamitism, 43
- Afflictions, merciful, 145
- Agincourt, Shakspeare’s battle of, 341
- Alexis, Luther’s friend, his sudden death, 359
- Ali, young, Mahomet’s kinsman and convert, 293
- Allegory, the sportful shadow of earnest faith, 243, 267
- Ambition, Fate’s appendage of, 78;
- Apprenticeships, 92
- Aprons, use and significance of, 31
- Arabia and the Arabs, 282, 310
- Art, all true Works of, symbolic, 163
- Baldr, the white Sungod, 255, 271
- Baphometic Fire-baptism, 128
- Barebone’s Parliament, 456
- Battle-field, a, 131
- Battle, Life-, our, 65;
- Being, the boundless Phantasmagoria of, 39
- Belief and Opinion, 146, 147
- Belief, the true god-announcing miracle, 292, 311, 375, 401;
- war of, 430.
- See Religion, Scepticism.
- Benthamism, 309, 400
- Bible of Universal History, 134, 146
- Biography, meaning and uses of, 56;
- significance of biographic facts, 152
- Blumine, 104;
- Bolivar’s Cavalry-uniform, 37
- Books, miraculous influence of, 130, 149, 388, 392;
- our modern University, Church and Parliament, 390
- Boswell, his reverence for Johnson, 410
- Banyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress, 244
- Burns, Gilbert, 417
- Burns, Robert, his birth, and humble heroic parents, 415;
- Kaaba, the, with its Black Stone and Sacred Well, 284, 285
- Canopus, the worship of, 247
- Charles I. fatally incapable of being dealt with, 439
- Childhood, happy season of, 68;
- early influences and sports, 69
- China, literary governors of, 397
- Christian Faith, a good Mother’s simple version of the, 75;
- Christian Love, 143, 145
- Church. See Books.
- Church-Clothes, 161;
- Circumstances, influence of, 71
- Clergy, the, with their surplices and cassock-aprons girt-on, 32, 158
- Clothes, not a spontaneous growth of the human animal, but an artificial device, 2;
- analogy between the Costumes of the body and the Customs of the spirit, 25;
- Decoration the first purpose of Clothes, 28;
- what Clothes have done for us, and what they threaten to do, 30, 43;
- fantastic garbs of the Middle Ages, 34;
- a simple costume, 35;
- tangible and mystic influences of Clothes, 36, 45;
- animal and human Clothing contrasted, 41;
- a Court-Ceremonial minus Clothes, 45;
- necessity for Clothes, 47;
- transparent Clothes, 49;
- all Emblematic things are Clothes, 54, 203;
- Genesis of the modern Clothes-Philosopher, 61;
- Character and conditions needed, 153, 156;
- George Fox’s suit of Leather, 159;
- Church-Clothes, 161;
- Old-Clothes, 179;
- practical inferences, 203
- Codification, 50
- Combination, value of, 101, 221
- Commons, British House of, 31
- Concealment. See Secrecy.
- Constitution, our invaluable British, 187
- Conversion, 149
- Courtesy, due to all men, 179
- Courtier, a luckless, 36
- Cromwell, 430;
- his hypochondria, 437, 442;
- early marriage and conversion, 437;
- an industrious farmer, 438;
- his victories and participation in the King’s death, 439;
- practicalness of, 440;
- his Ironsides, 440;
- his speeches, 444, 459;
- his ‘ambition’ and such-like, 446;
- a ‘Fanatic,’ but gradually became a ‘Hypocrite,’ 452;
- 470his dismissal of the Rump Parliament, 456;
- Protectorship and Parliamentary Futilities, 457;
- his last days, and closing sorrows, 460
- Custom the greatest of Weavers, 194
- Great!, mystic significance of the, 204;
- Dante and his Book, 318;
- biography in his Book, and Portrait, 319;
- his birth, education and early career, 319, 320;
- his love for Beatrice Portinari, 320;
- unhappy marriage, 320;
- banishment, 321;
- uncourtier-like ways of, 321;
- his Divina Commedia genuinely a song, 322;
- the Unseen World, as figured in the Christianity of the Middle Ages, 329;
- the ‘uses’ of Dante, 332
- David, the Hebrew King, 281
- Death, nourishment even in, 81, 127
- Della Scala, the court of, 321
- Devil, internecine war with the, 9, 90, 128, 139;
- cannot now so much as believe in him, 127
- Dilettantes and Pedants, 52;
- patrons of Literature, 96
- Diodorus Siculus, 284
- Diogenes, 159
- Divine Right of Kings, 424
- Doubt can only be removed by Action, 147.
- See Unbelief.
- Drudgery contrasted with Dandyism, 210;
- ‘Communion of Drudges,’ and what may come of it, 214
- Duelling, a picture of, 136
- Duty, no longer a divine Messenger and Guide, but a false earthly Fantasm, 122, 123;
- Edda, the Scandinavian, 253
- Editor’s first acquaintance with Teufelsdröckh and his Philosophy of Clothes, 4;
- efforts to make known his discovery to British readers, 7;
- admitted into the Teufelsdröckh watch-tower, 14, 25;
- first feels the pressure of his task, 37;
- his bulky Weissnichtwo Packet, 55;
- strenuous efforts to evolve some historic order out of such interminable documentary confusion, 59;
- partial success, 67, 76, 117;
- mysterious hints, 152, 177;
- astonishment and hesitation, 163;
- congratulations, 201;
- farewell, 219
- Education, influence of early, 71;
- Eighteenth Century, the sceptical, 398, 404, 433
- Eisleben, the birthplace of Luther, 358
- Eliot, 433, 434
- Elizabethan Era, the, 334
- Emblems, all visible things, 54
- Emigration, 173
- Eternity, looking through Time, 15, 55, 168
- Evil, Origin of, 143
- Eyes and Spectacles, 51
- Facts, engraved Hierograms, for which the fewest have the key, 153
- Faith, the one thing needful, 122
- Fantasy, the true Heaven-gate or Hell-gate of man, 109, 165
- Fashionable Novels, 208
- Fatherhood, 65
- Faults, his, not the criterion of any man 281
- Feebleness, the true misery, 124
- Fichte’s theory of literary men, 385
- Fire, and vital fire, 53, 129;
- miraculous nature of, 254
- Force, universal presence of, 53
- Forms, necessity for, 431
- Fortunatus’ Wishing-hat, 195, 197
- Fox’s, George, heavenward aspirations and earthly independence, 159
- Fraser’s Magazine, 6, 227
- Frederick the Great, symbolic glimpse of, 61
- Friendship, now obsolete, 89;
- Frost. See Fire.
- Futteral and his Wife, 61
- Future, organic filaments of the, 183
- Genius, the world’s treatment of, 94
- German speculative thought, 2, 9, 20, 24, 41;
- Gerund-grinding, 80
- Ghost, an authentic, 198
- Giotto, his portrait of Dante, 319
- God, the unslumbering, omnipresent, eternal, 40;
- Goethe’s inspired melody, 190;
- ‘characters,’ 337;
- notablest of literary men, 386
- Good, growth and propagation of, 75
- Graphic, secret of being, 325
- Gray’s misconception of Norse lore, 270
- Great Men, 134.
- See Man.
- Grimm the German Antiquary, and Odin, 260
- Gullibility, blessings of, 84
- Gunpowder, use of, 29, 136
- Habit, how, makes dullards of us all, 42
- Hagar, the Well of, 284, 285
- Half-men, 139
- Hampden, 433, 434
- Happiness, the whim of, 144
- Hegira, the, 295
- Heroes, Universal History of the united biographies of, 139, 266;
- Hero-worship, the corner-stone of all Society, 189;
- Heuschrecke and his biographic documents, 7;
- History, all-inweaving tissue of, 15;
- Homer’s Iliad, 169
- Hope, this world emphatically the place of, 122;
- false shadows of, 140
- Horse, his own tailor, 41
- Hutchinson and Cromwell, 433, 460
- Iceland, the home of Norse Poets, 253
- Ideal, the, exists only in the Actual, 148, 149
- Idolatry, 351;
- criminal only when insincere, 353
- Igdrasil, the Life-Tree, 257, 334
- Imagination. See Fantasy.
- Immortality, a glimpse of, 196
- Imposture, statistics of, 84
- Independence, foolish parade of, 175, 188
- Indifference, centre of, 128
- Infant intuitions and acquirements, 68;
- genius and dulness, 71
- Inspiration, perennial, 147, 157, 190
- Intellect, the summary of man’s gifts, 338, 397
- Invention, 29, 120
- Invisible, the, Nature the visible Garment of, 41;
- Irish, the, Poor-Slave, 213
- Islam, 291
- Isolation, 81
- Jesus of Nazareth, our divinest Symbol, 168, 171
- Job, the Book of, 284
- Johnson’s difficulties, poverty, hypochondria, 405, 406;
- Jötuns, 254, 272
- Julius the Second, Pope, 361
- Kadijah, the good, Mahomet’s first Wife, 288, 292
- King, our true, chosen for us in Heaven, 187;
- Kingdom, a man’s, 91
- Know thyself, and what thou canst work at, 124
- Knox’s influence on Scotland, 374;
- Koran, the, 298
- Koreish, the, Keepers of the Caabah, 293, 294, 354
- Kranach’s portrait of Luther, 372
- Labor, sacredness of, 171
- Ladrones Islands, what the natives of, thought regarding Fire, 254
- Lamaism, Grand, 242
- Land-owning, trade of, 96
- Language, the Garment of Thought, 54;
- dead vocables, 80
- Laughter, significance of, 24
- Leo X., the elegant Pagan Pope, 363
- Liberty and Equality, 357, 428
- Lieschen, 17
- Life, Human, picture of, 14, 115, 129, 141;
- Light the beginning of all Creation, 148
- Literary Men, 383;
- in China, 397
- Literature, chaotic condition of, 387;
- not our heaviest evil, 398
- Logic-mortar and wordy Air-Castles, 40;
- Louis XV., ungodly age of, 123
- Love, what we emphatically name, 102;
- Ludicrous, feeling and instances of the, 36, 136
- Luther’s birth and parentage, 358;
- hardship and rigorous necessity;
- death of his friend Alexis, 359;
- becomes a monk;
- his religious despair;
- finds a Bible, 360;
- his deliverance from darkness;
- at Rome, 361;
- Tetzel, 362;
- burns the Pope’s Bull, 363, 364;
- at the Diet of Worms, 364;
- King of the Reformation, 368;
- ‘Duke Georges for nine days running,’ 370;
- his little daughter’s deathbed;
- his solitary Patmos, 371;
- his Portrait, 372
- Magna Carta, 203
- Mahomet’s birth, boyhood, and youth, 286;
- marries Kadijah, 288;
- quiet, unambitious life, 288;
- divine commission, 290;
- the good Kadijah believes him, 292;
- 472Seid, his slave, 293;
- his Cousin Ali, 293;
- his offences and sore struggles, 293;
- flight from Mecca; being driven to take the sword, he uses it, 295;
- the Koran, 298;
- a veritable Hero, 305;
- Seid’s death, 306;
- freedom from cant, 306;
- the infinite nature of duty, 309
- Malthus’s over-population panic, 170
- Man, by nature naked, 2, 42, 46;
- Mary, Queen, and Knox, 378
- Mayflower, sailing of the, 373
- Mecca, its rise, 285; Mahomet’s flight from, 294, 295
- Metaphors, the stuff of Language, 54
- Metaphysics inexpressibly unproductive, 40, 51
- Middle Ages, represented by Dante and Shakspeare, 329, 333
- Milton, 124
- Mirabeau, his ambition, 450
- Miracles, significance of, 191, 197
- Monmouth Street, and its ‘Ou’ clo’’ Angels of Doom, 181
- Montrose, the Hero-Cavalier, 453, 454
- Mother’s, a, religious influence, 75
- Motive-Millwrights, 166
- Mountain scenery, 115
- Musical, all deep things, 317
- Mystery, all-pervading domain of, 51
- Nudity and hypocritical Clothing, 42, 47;
- Names, significance and influence of, 65, 195
- Napoleon and his Political Evangel, 135;
- compared with Cromwell, 461;
- a portentous mixture of Quack and Hero, 462;
- his instinct for the practical, 463;
- his democratic faith 463;
- his hatred of Anarchy, 464;
- apostatised from his old faith in Facts, and took to believing in Semblances, 464, 465;
- this Napoleonism was unjust, and could not last, 466
- Nature, the God-written Apocalypse of,39, 49;
- Necessity, brightened into Duty, 74
- Newspaper Editors, 33;
- Nothingness of life, 138, 139
- Nottingham bargemen, 255, 256
- Novalis, on Man, 248;
- Compliance, the lesson of, 74, 75
- Odin, the first Norse ‘man of genius,’ 258;
- Olaf, King, and Thor, 275
- Original man the sincere man, 280, 356
- Orpheus, 197
- Over-population, 170
- Own, conservation of a man’s, 151
- Paganism, Scandinavian, 241;
- not mere Allegory, 243;
- Nature-worship, 245, 266;
- Hero-worship, 248;
- creed of our fathers, 253, 272, 274;
- Impersonation of the visible workings of Nature, 254;
- contrasted with Greek Paganism, 256;
- the first Norse Thinker, 258;
- main practical Belief; indispensable to be brave, 267;
- hearty, homely, rugged Mythology, 270;
- Balder and Thor, 271;
- Consecration of Valour, 276
- Paradise and Fig-leaves, 27;
- Parliaments superseded by Books, 392;
- Cromwell’s Parliaments, 454
- Passivity and Activity, 74, 121
- Past, the, inextricably linked with the Present, 129;
- Paupers, what to do with, 173
- Peace-Era, the much-predicted, 133
- Peasant Saint, the, 172
- Pelham, and the Whole Duty of Dandies, 209
- Perseverance, law of, 178
- Person, mystery of a, 48, 101, 103, 179
- Philosophies, Cause-and-Effect, 26
- Phœnix Death-birth, 178, 183, 201
- Pitt, Mr., his reply when asked for help to Burns, 396
- Plato, the child-man of, 245
- Poet, the, and Prophet, 313, 332, 342
- Poetry and Prose, distinction of, 315, 323
- Popery, 367
- Poverty, advantages of, 334
- Priest, the true, a kind of Prophet, 346
- Printing, consequences of, 392
- Private judgment, 354
- Progress of the Species, 349
- Property, 150
- Prose. See Poetry.
- Proselytising, 6, 221
- Protestantism, the root of Modern European History, 364;
- Purgatory, noble Catholic conception of, 328
- Puritanism, founded by Knox, 373;
- Pym, 433, 434
- 473Radical ideas, Speculative, 10, 20, 47, 188
- Ragnarök, 275
- Raleigh’s, Sir Walter, fine mantle, 36
- Ramadhan, the month of, 290
- Raphael, the best of Portrait-Painters, 326
- Reformer, the true, 347
- Religion, dead letter and living spirit of, 87;
- Reverence, early growth of, 75;
- indispensability of, 188
- Revolution, 423;
- Richter, 24, 369
- Right and Wrong, 309, 329
- Rousseau, not a strong man, 411;
- Runes, 263, 264, 388
- Sabaeans, the worship of, 247, 283
- Sæmund, an early Christian priest, 253, 254
- St. Clement Danes, Church of, 407
- Saints, living Communion of, 185, 190
- Sarcasm, the panoply of, 99
- Sartor Resartus, genesis of, 7;
- its purpose, 201
- Saturn or Chronos, 98
- Savage, the aboriginal, 28
- Scarecrow, significance of the, 46
- Sceptical goose-cackle, 51
- Scepticism, a spiritual paralysis, 398-405, 433
- Schlegel, August Wilhelm, 341
- School education, insignificance of, 78, 80;
- Science, the Torch of, 1;
- the Scientific Head, 51
- Scotland awakened into life by Knox, 374
- Secrecy, benignant efficacies of, 164
- Secret, the open, 313
- Seid, Mahomet’s slave and friend, 293, 306
- Self-activity, 20
- Self-annihilation, 141
- Shakspeare and the Elizabethan Era, 334;
- Shame, divine, mysterious growth of, 30;
- the soil of all Virtue, 165
- Shekinah, Man the true, 247
- Silence, 135;
- Simon’s, Saint-, aphorism of the golden age, 178;
- a false application, 223
- Sincerity, better than gracefulness, 267;
- Smoke, advantage of consuming one’s, 114
- Snorro, his description of Odin, 260, 264, 268
- Society founded upon Cloth, 38, 45, 47;
- Solitude. See Silence.
- Sorrow-pangs of Self-deliverance, 115, 120, 121;
- Southey, and Literature, 396
- Space and Time, the Dream-Canvas upon which Life is imaged, 40, 49, 192, 195
- Spartan wisdom, 172
- Speculative intuition, 38.
- See German.
- Speech, great, but not greatest, 164
- Sphinx-riddle, the Universe a, 97
- Star worship, 247, 283
- Stealing, 151, 172
- Stupidity, blessings of, 123
- Style, varieties of, 54
- Suicide, 126
- Summary, 231
- Sunset, 70, 116
- Swallows, migrations and co-operative instincts of, 72
- Swineherd, the, 70
- Symbols, 163;
- Taboo, the War of, 306
- Tailors, symbolic significance of, 217
- Temptations in the wilderness, 138
- Testimonies of Authors, 227
- Tetzel, the Monk, 362, 363
- Teufelsdröckh’s Philosophy of Clothes, 4;
- he proposes a toast, 10;
- his personal aspect, and silent deep-seated Sansculottism, 11;
- thawed into speech, 13;
- memorable watch-tower utterances, 14;
- alone with the Stars, 16;
- extremely miscellaneous environment, 17;
- plainness of speech, 21;
- universal learning, and multiplex literary style, 22;
- ambiguous-looking morality, 23;
- one instance of laughter, 24;
- almost total want of arrangement, 25;
- feeling of the ludicrous, 36;
- speculative Radicalism, 47;
- a singular Character, 58;
- Genesis properly an Exodus, 62;
- unprecedented Name, 65;
- infantine experience, 66;
- Pedagogy, 76;
- an almost Hindoo Passivity, 76;
- schoolboy jostling, 79;
- heterogeneous University Life, 83;
- fever-paroxysms of Doubt, 87;
- first practical knowledge of the English, 88;
- getting under way, 90;
- ill success, 94;
- glimpse of high life, 96;
- 474casts himself on the Universe, 101;
- reverent feeling towards Women, 102;
- frantically in love, 104;
- first interview with Blumine, 106;
- inspired moments, 108;
- short of practical kitchen-stuff, 111;
- ideal bliss and actual catastrophe, 112;
- sorrows and peripatetic stoicism, 113;
- a parting glimpse of his Beloved on her way to England, 116;
- how he overran the whole earth, 118;
- Doubt darkened unto Unbelief, 122;
- love of Truth, 124;
- a feeble unit, amidst a threatening Infinitude, 125;
- Baphometic Fire-baptism, 128;
- placid indifference, 129;
- a Hyperborean intruder, 136;
- Nothingness of life, 138;
- Temptations in the wilderness, 138;
- dawning of a better day, 141;
- the Ideal in the Actual, 148;
- finds his true Calling, 149;
- his Biography a symbolic Adumbration, significant to those who can decipher it, 152;
- a wonder-lover, seeker and worker, 156;
- in Monmouth Street among the Hebrews, 181;
- concluding hints, 219;
- his public History not yet done, perhaps the better part only beginning, 223
- Theocracy, a, striven for by all true Reformers, 382, 451
- Thinking Man, a, the worst enemy of the Prince of Darkness, 91, 150;
- true Thought can never die, 185
- Thor, and his adventures, 255, 271-274;
- his last appearance, 275
- Thought, miraculous influence of, 258, 266, 393;
- musical Thought, 316
- Thunder. See Thor.
- Time, the great mystery of, 246
- Time-Spirit, life-battle with the, 65, 98;
- Time, the universal wonder-hider, 197
- Titles of Honour, 186
- Tolerance, true and false, 368, 379
- Tools, influence of, 30;
- the Pen, most miraculous of tools, 150
- Trial by Jury, Burke’s opinion of, 422
- Turenne, 312
- Disbelief, era of, 86, 112;
- Universities, 83, 389
- Utgard, Thor’s expedition to, 273, 274
- Utilitarianism, 121, 176
- Valkyries, the, 267, 268
- Valour, the basis of all virtue, 268, 271;
- Vates, the, 313, 314, 317
- View-hunting and diseased Self-consciousness, 117
- Voltaire, 146;
- Conflict, 131
- Wisdom, 50
- Wish, the Norse god, 255;
- enlarged into a heaven by Mahomet, 310
- Woman’s influence, 102
- Wonder the basis of Worship, 50;
- region of, 51
- Words, slavery to, 40;
- Word-mongering and Motive-grinding, 123
- Workshop of Life, 149.
- See Labour.
- Worms, Luther at, 364
- Worship, transcendent wonder, 247.
- See Hero-worship.
- Youth Men and Maidens, 97
- Zamzam, the sacred Well, 284
THE END
THE END
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!