This is a modern-English version of Utopia, originally written by More, Thomas, Saint. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.

Utopia

by Thomas More


Contents

INTRODUCTION
DISCOURSES OF RAPHAEL HYTHLODAY, OF THE BEST STATE OF A COMMONWEALTH
OF THEIR TOWNS, PARTICULARLY OF AMAUROT
OF THEIR MAGISTRATES
OF THEIR TRADES, AND MANNER OF LIFE
OF THEIR TRAFFIC
OF THE TRAVELLING OF THE UTOPIANS
OF THEIR SLAVES, AND OF THEIR MARRIAGES
OF THEIR MILITARY DISCIPLINE
OF THE RELIGIONS OF THE UTOPIANS

UTOPIA

INTRODUCTION

Sir Thomas More, son of Sir John More, a justice of the King’s Bench, was born in 1478, in Milk Street, in the city of London. After his earlier education at St. Anthony’s School, in Threadneedle Street, he was placed, as a boy, in the household of Cardinal John Morton, Archbishop of Canterbury and Lord Chancellor. It was not unusual for persons of wealth or influence and sons of good families to be so established together in a relation of patron and client. The youth wore his patron’s livery, and added to his state. The patron used, afterwards, his wealth or influence in helping his young client forward in the world. Cardinal Morton had been in earlier days that Bishop of Ely whom Richard III. sent to the Tower; was busy afterwards in hostility to Richard; and was a chief adviser of Henry VII., who in 1486 made him Archbishop of Canterbury, and nine months afterwards Lord Chancellor. Cardinal Morton—of talk at whose table there are recollections in “Utopia”—delighted in the quick wit of young Thomas More. He once said, “Whoever shall live to try it, shall see this child here waiting at table prove a notable and rare man.”

Sir Thomas More, the son of Sir John More, a judge in the King’s Bench, was born in 1478 on Milk Street in London. After attending St. Anthony’s School on Threadneedle Street, he was taken as a boy into the household of Cardinal John Morton, the Archbishop of Canterbury and Lord Chancellor. It was common for wealthy or influential people and the sons of good families to establish such relationships of patronage. The young boy wore his patron’s livery, enhancing his status. Later, the patron would use his wealth or influence to help his young protégé succeed in life. Cardinal Morton was previously the Bishop of Ely, who Richard III sent to the Tower; he later opposed Richard and became a key advisor to Henry VII, who named him Archbishop of Canterbury in 1486 and Lord Chancellor nine months later. Cardinal Morton—whose conversations at the table are mentioned in “Utopia”—appreciated the sharp wit of young Thomas More. He once remarked, “Whoever lives to see it will find this child waiting at the table become a remarkable and exceptional man.”

At the age of about nineteen, Thomas More was sent to Canterbury College, Oxford, by his patron, where he learnt Greek of the first men who brought Greek studies from Italy to England—William Grocyn and Thomas Linacre. Linacre, a physician, who afterwards took orders, was also the founder of the College of Physicians. In 1499, More left Oxford to study law in London, at Lincoln’s Inn, and in the next year Archbishop Morton died.

At around nineteen, Thomas More was sent to Canterbury College, Oxford, by his patron, where he learned Greek from the first people who brought Greek studies from Italy to England—William Grocyn and Thomas Linacre. Linacre, a doctor who later became a clergyman, also founded the College of Physicians. In 1499, More left Oxford to study law in London at Lincoln’s Inn, and the following year, Archbishop Morton passed away.

More’s earnest character caused him while studying law to aim at the subduing of the flesh, by wearing a hair shirt, taking a log for a pillow, and whipping himself on Fridays. At the age of twenty-one he entered Parliament, and soon after he had been called to the bar he was made Under-Sheriff of London. In 1503 he opposed in the House of Commons Henry VII.’s proposal for a subsidy on account of the marriage portion of his daughter Margaret; and he opposed with so much energy that the House refused to grant it. One went and told the king that a beardless boy had disappointed all his expectations. During the last years, therefore, of Henry VII. More was under the displeasure of the king, and had thoughts of leaving the country.

More's earnest nature drove him during his law studies to focus on mastering his desires by wearing a hair shirt, using a log as a pillow, and whipping himself on Fridays. At twenty-one, he entered Parliament, and shortly after being called to the bar, he became Under-Sheriff of London. In 1503, he opposed Henry VII's proposal for a subsidy for his daughter Margaret's marriage portion in the House of Commons. He argued so passionately that the House refused to grant it. Someone reported to the king that a beardless boy had dashed all his hopes. Consequently, in the final years of Henry VII's reign, More fell out of favor with the king and considered leaving the country.

Henry VII. died in April, 1509, when More’s age was a little over thirty. In the first years of the reign of Henry VIII. he rose to large practice in the law courts, where it is said he refused to plead in cases which he thought unjust, and took no fees from widows, orphans, or the poor. He would have preferred marrying the second daughter of John Colt, of New Hall, in Essex, but chose her elder sister, that he might not subject her to the discredit of being passed over.

Henry VII died in April 1509, when More was just over thirty. In the early years of Henry VIII's reign, he built a successful legal practice, where he reportedly refused to represent cases he believed were unjust and did not take fees from widows, orphans, or the poor. He would have preferred to marry the second daughter of John Colt from New Hall in Essex, but chose her older sister instead to spare her the shame of being overlooked.

In 1513 Thomas More, still Under-Sheriff of London, is said to have written his “History of the Life and Death of King Edward V., and of the Usurpation of Richard III.” The book, which seems to contain the knowledge and opinions of More’s patron, Morton, was not printed until 1557, when its writer had been twenty-two years dead. It was then printed from a MS. in More’s handwriting.

In 1513, Thomas More, who was still the Under-Sheriff of London, reportedly wrote his “History of the Life and Death of King Edward V, and of the Usurpation of Richard III.” The book, which appears to reflect the thoughts and insights of More’s patron, Morton, wasn't published until 1557, twenty-two years after More had died. It was then printed from a manuscript in More’s handwriting.

In the year 1515 Wolsey, Archbishop of York, was made Cardinal by Leo X.; Henry VIII. made him Lord Chancellor, and from that year until 1523 the King and the Cardinal ruled England with absolute authority, and called no parliament. In May of the year 1515 Thomas More—not knighted yet—was joined in a commission to the Low Countries with Cuthbert Tunstal and others to confer with the ambassadors of Charles V., then only Archduke of Austria, upon a renewal of alliance. On that embassy More, aged about thirty-seven, was absent from England for six months, and while at Antwerp he established friendship with Peter Giles (Latinised Ægidius), a scholarly and courteous young man, who was secretary to the municipality of Antwerp.

In 1515, Wolsey, the Archbishop of York, was made a Cardinal by Leo X. Henry VIII appointed him as Lord Chancellor, and from that year until 1523, the King and the Cardinal ruled England with full power, without calling any parliament. In May of 1515, Thomas More—who had not yet been knighted—was appointed to a commission to the Low Countries along with Cuthbert Tunstal and others to discuss a renewal of alliance with the ambassadors of Charles V., who was then just the Archduke of Austria. During this mission, More, who was about thirty-seven years old, was away from England for six months, and while in Antwerp, he became friends with Peter Giles (also known as Ægidius), a learned and courteous young man who served as the secretary for the municipality of Antwerp.

Cuthbert Tunstal was a rising churchman, chancellor to the Archbishop of Canterbury, who in that year (1515) was made Archdeacon of Chester, and in May of the next year (1516) Master of the Rolls. In 1516 he was sent again to the Low Countries, and More then went with him to Brussels, where they were in close companionship with Erasmus.

Cuthbert Tunstal was an up-and-coming church leader, chancellor to the Archbishop of Canterbury, who in 1515 became the Archdeacon of Chester, and in May of the following year, 1516, was appointed Master of the Rolls. In 1516, he went back to the Low Countries, and More accompanied him to Brussels, where they spent time together with Erasmus.

More’s “Utopia” was written in Latin, and is in two parts, of which the second, describing the place ([Greek text]—or Nusquama, as he called it sometimes in his letters—“Nowhere”), was probably written towards the close of 1515; the first part, introductory, early in 1516. The book was first printed at Louvain, late in 1516, under the editorship of Erasmus, Peter Giles, and other of More’s friends in Flanders. It was then revised by More, and printed by Frobenius at Basle in November, 1518. It was reprinted at Paris and Vienna, but was not printed in England during More’s lifetime. Its first publication in this country was in the English translation, made in Edward’s VI.’s reign (1551) by Ralph Robinson. It was translated with more literary skill by Gilbert Burnet, in 1684, soon after he had conducted the defence of his friend Lord William Russell, attended his execution, vindicated his memory, and been spitefully deprived by James II. of his lectureship at St. Clement’s. Burnet was drawn to the translation of “Utopia” by the same sense of unreason in high places that caused More to write the book. Burnet’s is the translation given in this volume.

More’s “Utopia” was written in Latin and is divided into two parts. The second part, which describes the place (Νουσχάμα— or “Nowhere,” as he sometimes referred to it in his letters), was likely written towards the end of 1515, while the first, introductory part, was written in early 1516. The book was first printed in Louvain in late 1516, edited by Erasmus, Peter Giles, and other friends of More in Flanders. More then revised it, and it was printed by Frobenius in Basle in November 1518. It was reprinted in Paris and Vienna but wasn’t printed in England during More’s lifetime. Its first publication in England was an English translation made during Edward VI’s reign (1551) by Ralph Robinson. A more skillful translation was done by Gilbert Burnet in 1684, shortly after he defended his friend Lord William Russell, attended his execution, vindicated his memory, and was spitefully stripped of his lectureship at St. Clement’s by James II. Burnet was motivated to translate “Utopia” by the same irrationality in high places that inspired More to write the book. Burnet’s translation is the one included in this volume.

The name of the book has given an adjective to our language—we call an impracticable scheme Utopian. Yet, under the veil of a playful fiction, the talk is intensely earnest, and abounds in practical suggestion. It is the work of a scholarly and witty Englishman, who attacks in his own way the chief political and social evils of his time. Beginning with fact, More tells how he was sent into Flanders with Cuthbert Tunstal, “whom the king’s majesty of late, to the great rejoicing of all men, did prefer to the office of Master of the Rolls;” how the commissioners of Charles met them at Bruges, and presently returned to Brussels for instructions; and how More then went to Antwerp, where he found a pleasure in the society of Peter Giles which soothed his desire to see again his wife and children, from whom he had been four months away. Then fact slides into fiction with the finding of Raphael Hythloday (whose name, made of two Greek words [Greek text] and [Greek text], means “knowing in trifles”), a man who had been with Amerigo Vespucci in the three last of the voyages to the new world lately discovered, of which the account had been first printed in 1507, only nine years before Utopia was written.

The title of the book has added an adjective to our language—we refer to an impractical plan as Utopian. However, beneath the playful story, the discussion is very serious and filled with practical ideas. It’s written by a knowledgeable and witty Englishman, who critiques the main political and social problems of his time in his unique style. Starting with reality, More recounts how he was sent to Flanders with Cuthbert Tunstal, “whom the king recently appointed to the position of Master of the Rolls to the great joy of everyone;” how the commissioners of Charles met them in Bruges, then returned to Brussels for directions; and how More then traveled to Antwerp, where he enjoyed the company of Peter Giles, which eased his longing to see his wife and children, from whom he had been apart for four months. Then reality shifts into fiction with the introduction of Raphael Hythloday (whose name, derived from two Greek words, means “knowing in trifles”), a man who had sailed with Amerigo Vespucci on the last three voyages to the newly discovered world, the accounts of which were first published in 1507, just nine years before Utopia was written.

Designedly fantastic in suggestion of details, “Utopia” is the work of a scholar who had read Plato’s “Republic,” and had his fancy quickened after reading Plutarch’s account of Spartan life under Lycurgus. Beneath the veil of an ideal communism, into which there has been worked some witty extravagance, there lies a noble English argument. Sometimes More puts the case as of France when he means England. Sometimes there is ironical praise of the good faith of Christian kings, saving the book from censure as a political attack on the policy of Henry VIII. Erasmus wrote to a friend in 1517 that he should send for More’s “Utopia,” if he had not read it, and “wished to see the true source of all political evils.” And to More Erasmus wrote of his book, “A burgomaster of Antwerp is so pleased with it that he knows it all by heart.”

Intentionally imaginative in its details, “Utopia” is the creation of a scholar who had studied Plato’s “Republic” and was inspired by Plutarch’s account of Spartan life under Lycurgus. Behind the mask of an ideal communist society, laced with some clever absurdities, lies a strong English argument. At times, More refers to France when he really means England. Occasionally, there’s ironic praise of the integrity of Christian kings, which protects the book from being seen as a political critique of Henry VIII's policies. In 1517, Erasmus wrote to a friend suggesting he should get a copy of More’s “Utopia” if he hadn’t read it yet and wanted to see the real source of all political evils. And to More, Erasmus commented on his book, “A burgomaster of Antwerp loves it so much that he knows it by heart.”

H. M.

H. M.

DISCOURSES OF RAPHAEL HYTHLODAY, OF THE BEST STATE OF A COMMONWEALTH

Henry VIII., the unconquered King of England, a prince adorned with all the virtues that become a great monarch, having some differences of no small consequence with Charles the most serene Prince of Castile, sent me into Flanders, as his ambassador, for treating and composing matters between them. I was colleague and companion to that incomparable man Cuthbert Tonstal, whom the King, with such universal applause, lately made Master of the Rolls; but of whom I will say nothing; not because I fear that the testimony of a friend will be suspected, but rather because his learning and virtues are too great for me to do them justice, and so well known, that they need not my commendations, unless I would, according to the proverb, “Show the sun with a lantern.” Those that were appointed by the Prince to treat with us, met us at Bruges, according to agreement; they were all worthy men. The Margrave of Bruges was their head, and the chief man among them; but he that was esteemed the wisest, and that spoke for the rest, was George Temse, the Provost of Casselsee: both art and nature had concurred to make him eloquent: he was very learned in the law; and, as he had a great capacity, so, by a long practice in affairs, he was very dexterous at unravelling them. After we had several times met, without coming to an agreement, they went to Brussels for some days, to know the Prince’s pleasure; and, since our business would admit it, I went to Antwerp. While I was there, among many that visited me, there was one that was more acceptable to me than any other, Peter Giles, born at Antwerp, who is a man of great honour, and of a good rank in his town, though less than he deserves; for I do not know if there be anywhere to be found a more learned and a better bred young man; for as he is both a very worthy and a very knowing person, so he is so civil to all men, so particularly kind to his friends, and so full of candour and affection, that there is not, perhaps, above one or two anywhere to be found, that is in all respects so perfect a friend: he is extraordinarily modest, there is no artifice in him, and yet no man has more of a prudent simplicity. His conversation was so pleasant and so innocently cheerful, that his company in a great measure lessened any longings to go back to my country, and to my wife and children, which an absence of four months had quickened very much. One day, as I was returning home from mass at St. Mary’s, which is the chief church, and the most frequented of any in Antwerp, I saw him, by accident, talking with a stranger, who seemed past the flower of his age; his face was tanned, he had a long beard, and his cloak was hanging carelessly about him, so that, by his looks and habit, I concluded he was a seaman. As soon as Peter saw me, he came and saluted me, and as I was returning his civility, he took me aside, and pointing to him with whom he had been discoursing, he said, “Do you see that man? I was just thinking to bring him to you.” I answered, “He should have been very welcome on your account.” “And on his own too,” replied he, “if you knew the man, for there is none alive that can give so copious an account of unknown nations and countries as he can do, which I know you very much desire.” “Then,” said I, “I did not guess amiss, for at first sight I took him for a seaman.” “But you are much mistaken,” said he, “for he has not sailed as a seaman, but as a traveller, or rather a philosopher. This Raphael, who from his family carries the name of Hythloday, is not ignorant of the Latin tongue, but is eminently learned in the Greek, having applied himself more particularly to that than to the former, because he had given himself much to philosophy, in which he knew that the Romans have left us nothing that is valuable, except what is to be found in Seneca and Cicero. He is a Portuguese by birth, and was so desirous of seeing the world, that he divided his estate among his brothers, ran the same hazard as Americus Vesputius, and bore a share in three of his four voyages that are now published; only he did not return with him in his last, but obtained leave of him, almost by force, that he might be one of those twenty-four who were left at the farthest place at which they touched in their last voyage to New Castile. The leaving him thus did not a little gratify one that was more fond of travelling than of returning home to be buried in his own country; for he used often to say, that the way to heaven was the same from all places, and he that had no grave had the heavens still over him. Yet this disposition of mind had cost him dear, if God had not been very gracious to him; for after he, with five Castalians, had travelled over many countries, at last, by strange good fortune, he got to Ceylon, and from thence to Calicut, where he, very happily, found some Portuguese ships; and, beyond all men’s expectations, returned to his native country.” When Peter had said this to me, I thanked him for his kindness in intending to give me the acquaintance of a man whose conversation he knew would be so acceptable; and upon that Raphael and I embraced each other. After those civilities were past which are usual with strangers upon their first meeting, we all went to my house, and entering into the garden, sat down on a green bank and entertained one another in discourse. He told us that when Vesputius had sailed away, he, and his companions that stayed behind in New Castile, by degrees insinuated themselves into the affections of the people of the country, meeting often with them and treating them gently; and at last they not only lived among them without danger, but conversed familiarly with them, and got so far into the heart of a prince, whose name and country I have forgot, that he both furnished them plentifully with all things necessary, and also with the conveniences of travelling, both boats when they went by water, and waggons when they travelled over land: he sent with them a very faithful guide, who was to introduce and recommend them to such other princes as they had a mind to see: and after many days’ journey, they came to towns, and cities, and to commonwealths, that were both happily governed and well peopled. Under the equator, and as far on both sides of it as the sun moves, there lay vast deserts that were parched with the perpetual heat of the sun; the soil was withered, all things looked dismally, and all places were either quite uninhabited, or abounded with wild beasts and serpents, and some few men, that were neither less wild nor less cruel than the beasts themselves. But, as they went farther, a new scene opened, all things grew milder, the air less burning, the soil more verdant, and even the beasts were less wild: and, at last, there were nations, towns, and cities, that had not only mutual commerce among themselves and with their neighbours, but traded, both by sea and land, to very remote countries. There they found the conveniencies of seeing many countries on all hands, for no ship went any voyage into which he and his companions were not very welcome. The first vessels that they saw were flat-bottomed, their sails were made of reeds and wicker, woven close together, only some were of leather; but, afterwards, they found ships made with round keels and canvas sails, and in all respects like our ships, and the seamen understood both astronomy and navigation. He got wonderfully into their favour by showing them the use of the needle, of which till then they were utterly ignorant. They sailed before with great caution, and only in summer time; but now they count all seasons alike, trusting wholly to the loadstone, in which they are, perhaps, more secure than safe; so that there is reason to fear that this discovery, which was thought would prove so much to their advantage, may, by their imprudence, become an occasion of much mischief to them. But it were too long to dwell on all that he told us he had observed in every place, it would be too great a digression from our present purpose: whatever is necessary to be told concerning those wise and prudent institutions which he observed among civilised nations, may perhaps be related by us on a more proper occasion. We asked him many questions concerning all these things, to which he answered very willingly; we made no inquiries after monsters, than which nothing is more common; for everywhere one may hear of ravenous dogs and wolves, and cruel men-eaters, but it is not so easy to find states that are well and wisely governed.

Henry VIII, the undefeated King of England, a prince with all the qualities of a great monarch, had some significant disagreements with Charles, the Prince of Castile, and sent me to Flanders as his ambassador to negotiate and resolve their issues. I was colleagues with that remarkable man Cuthbert Tonstal, whom the King recently appointed Master of the Rolls, gaining much praise; but I won’t say much about him. It’s not that I worry my praise will be doubted, but rather his knowledge and virtues are so vast that I can’t do them justice, and everyone knows how great he is, so he doesn’t need my commendations, as the saying goes, “Why show the sun with a lantern?” The Prince's representatives met us in Bruges as agreed; they were all honorable men. The Margrave of Bruges was their leader, but the one considered the wisest and who spoke for the rest was George Temse, the Provost of Casselsee. He was naturally eloquent and highly knowledgeable in the law, with great capacity and extensive experience in practical affairs, making him skilled at solving complex issues. After several meetings without reaching an agreement, they went to Brussels for a few days to consult the Prince. Since our discussions allowed it, I took the opportunity to visit Antwerp. While I was there, many came to visit me, but one stood out among them, Peter Giles, a man of great honor from Antwerp, who deserves more recognition than he gets. I’ve never met a more educated and well-mannered young man; he is both worthy and knowledgeable, extremely polite to everyone, particularly kind to his friends, and filled with openness and warmth. Perhaps there are only one or two others like him who are such perfect friends in all respects. He is exceptionally modest, genuine, and yet has a wise simplicity about him. His company was so enjoyable and cheerfully innocent that it greatly eased my longing to return to my home, wife, and children after being away for four months. One day, as I was coming home from mass at St. Mary’s, the main church in Antwerp, I happened to see him talking to a stranger who looked past his prime; he had a tan face, a long beard, and his cloak hung loosely, leading me to believe he was a sailor. As soon as Peter spotted me, he came over to greet me, and while I was replying, he pulled me aside and gestured toward the man he was speaking with, saying, “Do you see that man? I was just thinking of introducing him to you.” I replied, “He would have been very welcome because of you.” “And because of himself,” he said, “if you knew him, as no one else can share such detailed knowledge of unknown nations and lands as he can, which I know you’re very eager to hear about.” “Then,” I said, “I guessed correctly, as I took him for a sailor at first glance.” “But you’re mistaken,” he responded, “he hasn’t sailed as a sailor, but as a traveler, or more accurately, a philosopher. This Raphael, bearing the name Hythloday from his family, knows Latin but is especially skilled in Greek, having focused more on it than the former because he realized that the Romans left us little of value in philosophy, apart from what’s found in Seneca and Cicero. He is originally from Portugal and was so eager to see the world that he split his inheritance among his brothers, took the same risks as Americus Vesputius, and participated in three of his four published voyages; however, he didn’t return with him on the last trip but insisted on being one of the twenty-four left at the furthest point during their last expedition to New Castile. Leaving him there pleased him greatly, as he preferred traveling to returning home to face burial in his own country; he often mentioned that the way to heaven is the same from all locations, and a person without a grave has the skies above him. Yet this desire for adventure nearly cost him dearly without God’s favor. After journeying with five Castalians through many countries, he fortunately arrived in Ceylon and subsequently at Calicut, where he happily found some Portuguese ships; astonishingly, he returned to his homeland against all odds.” After Peter shared this, I thanked him for wanting to introduce me to someone whose company he knew I would appreciate, and Raphael and I embraced. After the usual polite exchanges between strangers meeting for the first time, we all went to my house, entered the garden, sat on a green bank, and conversed. He shared that when Vesputius had sailed off, he and his companions who stayed behind in New Castile gradually won the locals' favor by frequently interacting with them and treating them kindly. Eventually, they not only lived among them without any danger but got close to a prince, whose name and country I forget, who generously provided them with all necessary supplies and travel equipment, including boats for water travel and wagons for land travel. He sent along a trustworthy guide to introduce and recommend them to other princes they wished to meet. After days of traveling, they came upon well-governed towns, cities, and thriving communities. Under the equator and in both directions, vast, parched deserts lay under constant sun, with withered soil and grim surroundings, often uninhabited or filled with wild beasts and serpents, and occasionally a few men who were as savage as the animals. But as they traveled further, a new landscape unfolded; the weather became milder, the air less intense, the land greener, and even the beasts grew less feral. Eventually, they found nations, towns, and cities that engaged in trade, both by sea and land, with far-off regions. They discovered numerous opportunities to explore various territories, as no ship would embark on a voyage that they and their companions weren’t welcomed to join. The first vessels they encountered had flat bottoms with sails made of reeds and wicker, tightly woven, and some were leather; later, they discovered ships with round keels and canvas sails just like ours, with sailors knowledgeable in both astronomy and navigation. He won their favor by introducing them to the compass, which they had never heard of until then. They used to be cautious sailors, only traveling in the summer, but now they treat all seasons alike, relying entirely on the lodestone, which may seem secure but is not entirely safe; thus, there’s reason to fear that a discovery thought to be advantageous could lead to significant troubles due to their recklessness. It would take too long to recount everything he observed everywhere; it’s too great a diversion from our current purpose. Anything essential regarding the wise and prudent systems he noted among civilized nations could perhaps be discussed on a more appropriate occasion. We asked him many questions about these matters, which he answered willingly; we didn’t ask about monsters, as those tales are everywhere, often featuring ravenous dogs, wolves, and brutal cannibals, yet finding well and wisely governed states is much rarer.

As he told us of many things that were amiss in those new-discovered countries, so he reckoned up not a few things, from which patterns might be taken for correcting the errors of these nations among whom we live; of which an account may be given, as I have already promised, at some other time; for, at present, I intend only to relate those particulars that he told us, of the manners and laws of the Utopians: but I will begin with the occasion that led us to speak of that commonwealth. After Raphael had discoursed with great judgment on the many errors that were both among us and these nations, had treated of the wise institutions both here and there, and had spoken as distinctly of the customs and government of every nation through which he had past, as if he had spent his whole life in it, Peter, being struck with admiration, said, “I wonder, Raphael, how it comes that you enter into no king’s service, for I am sure there are none to whom you would not be very acceptable; for your learning and knowledge, both of men and things, is such, that you would not only entertain them very pleasantly, but be of great use to them, by the examples you could set before them, and the advices you could give them; and by this means you would both serve your own interest, and be of great use to all your friends.” “As for my friends,” answered he, “I need not be much concerned, having already done for them all that was incumbent on me; for when I was not only in good health, but fresh and young, I distributed that among my kindred and friends which other people do not part with till they are old and sick: when they then unwillingly give that which they can enjoy no longer themselves. I think my friends ought to rest contented with this, and not to expect that for their sakes I should enslave myself to any king whatsoever.” “Soft and fair!” said Peter; “I do not mean that you should be a slave to any king, but only that you should assist them and be useful to them.” “The change of the word,” said he, “does not alter the matter.” “But term it as you will,” replied Peter, “I do not see any other way in which you can be so useful, both in private to your friends and to the public, and by which you can make your own condition happier.” “Happier?” answered Raphael, “is that to be compassed in a way so abhorrent to my genius? Now I live as I will, to which I believe, few courtiers can pretend; and there are so many that court the favour of great men, that there will be no great loss if they are not troubled either with me or with others of my temper.” Upon this, said I, “I perceive, Raphael, that you neither desire wealth nor greatness; and, indeed, I value and admire such a man much more than I do any of the great men in the world. Yet I think you would do what would well become so generous and philosophical a soul as yours is, if you would apply your time and thoughts to public affairs, even though you may happen to find it a little uneasy to yourself; and this you can never do with so much advantage as by being taken into the council of some great prince and putting him on noble and worthy actions, which I know you would do if you were in such a post; for the springs both of good and evil flow from the prince over a whole nation, as from a lasting fountain. So much learning as you have, even without practice in affairs, or so great a practice as you have had, without any other learning, would render you a very fit counsellor to any king whatsoever.” “You are doubly mistaken,” said he, “Mr. More, both in your opinion of me and in the judgment you make of things: for as I have not that capacity that you fancy I have, so if I had it, the public would not be one jot the better when I had sacrificed my quiet to it. For most princes apply themselves more to affairs of war than to the useful arts of peace; and in these I neither have any knowledge, nor do I much desire it; they are generally more set on acquiring new kingdoms, right or wrong, than on governing well those they possess: and, among the ministers of princes, there are none that are not so wise as to need no assistance, or at least, that do not think themselves so wise that they imagine they need none; and if they court any, it is only those for whom the prince has much personal favour, whom by their fawning and flatteries they endeavour to fix to their own interests; and, indeed, nature has so made us, that we all love to be flattered and to please ourselves with our own notions: the old crow loves his young, and the ape her cubs. Now if in such a court, made up of persons who envy all others and only admire themselves, a person should but propose anything that he had either read in history or observed in his travels, the rest would think that the reputation of their wisdom would sink, and that their interests would be much depressed if they could not run it down: and, if all other things failed, then they would fly to this, that such or such things pleased our ancestors, and it were well for us if we could but match them. They would set up their rest on such an answer, as a sufficient confutation of all that could be said, as if it were a great misfortune that any should be found wiser than his ancestors. But though they willingly let go all the good things that were among those of former ages, yet, if better things are proposed, they cover themselves obstinately with this excuse of reverence to past times. I have met with these proud, morose, and absurd judgments of things in many places, particularly once in England.” “Were you ever there?” said I. “Yes, I was,” answered he, “and stayed some months there, not long after the rebellion in the West was suppressed, with a great slaughter of the poor people that were engaged in it.

As he shared with us many issues in those newly discovered countries, he also listed several things that could serve as examples for addressing the mistakes of the nations we live in; I can provide those details later, as I have already promised. For now, I want to focus on what he told us about the customs and laws of the Utopians, starting with how we came to discuss that society. After Raphael had spoken wisely about the numerous mistakes in both our society and those nations, had discussed the smart practices found here and there, and had described as clearly as if he had lived there forever the customs and governance of every country he had visited, Peter said, “I can’t help but wonder, Raphael, why you don’t serve any king, because I’m sure there’s no one who wouldn’t appreciate you. Your knowledge of people and things is so extensive that you could entertain them and provide them with great help through your examples and advice; in doing so, you'd not only benefit yourself but also be valuable to your friends.” “As for my friends,” he replied, “I don’t need to worry much, as I’ve already done everything I owe them. When I was young and healthy, I shared what others typically hold onto until they are old or sick and can no longer enjoy it. I think my friends should be satisfied with this and not expect me to tie myself to any king.” “Come on now!” Peter said. “I don’t mean you should be a slave to any king, just that you should help them and be useful.” “Changing the word doesn’t change the idea,” he said. “Whatever you call it,” Peter replied, “I can’t see another way for you to be so helpful, both to your friends privately and to the public, and to make your own situation better.” “Better?” Raphael said. “Can that be achieved in a way that goes against my nature? I live as I choose, which I believe few courtiers can claim; many seek the favor of powerful people, so there’s no great loss if they’re not burdened by me or others like me.” At this point, I said, “I see, Raphael, that you don’t desire wealth or power; and honestly, I admire you a lot more than I do any of those great figures. Yet I think it would suit your generous and philosophical nature well if you devoted your time and thoughts to public affairs, even if it might be a bit uncomfortable for you; you could do this most effectively by joining the council of some great prince and encouraging him toward noble actions, which I know you would do in that capacity. The flow of good and bad in a nation stems from the prince like a lasting fountain. With your knowledge, even without practical experience, or with your significant experience without additional education, you would make a great advisor to any king.” “You’re mistaken on both counts,” he said, “Mr. More, both in how you perceive me and how you judge situations. I don’t have the capabilities you think I do, and even if I did, the public wouldn’t benefit one bit from me sacrificing my peace for it. Most princes focus more on war than on the useful arts of peace, and I have little knowledge in this area and don’t care for it much either; they’re generally more interested in acquiring new kingdoms, regardless of how right or wrong it is, than in governing well what they already have. Among the ministers of princes, there’s no one who doesn’t think they’re wise enough to need help, or at least, they believe they don’t need any; if they do seek out help, it’s only from those who the prince favors personally, whom they try to attach to their own interests through flattery. Indeed, nature has made us all love flattery and enjoy our own opinions; the old crow loves his young, and the ape her cubs. So, if someone in such an environment, filled with people who envy others and only admire themselves, were to suggest something they had either read in history or observed in their travels, the rest would feel their reputation for wisdom would be at risk and their own interests threatened if they couldn’t shoot it down. And if all else fails, they would revert to claiming that such and such things pleased our ancestors, and it would be better for us if we could mimic them. They would use that as a sufficient rebuttal to anything that could be said, as if it were a tragedy if anyone were found to be wiser than their ancestors. Even though they willingly let go of all the good things from the past, if better things are proposed, they stubbornly cling to an excuse of reverence for bygone days. I have encountered this arrogant, gloomy, and nonsensical mentality in many places, especially once in England.” “Were you ever there?” I asked. “Yes, I was,” he replied. “And I stayed for several months after the rebellion in the West was put down, which resulted in a great slaughter of those poor people involved.”

“I was then much obliged to that reverend prelate, John Morton, Archbishop of Canterbury, Cardinal, and Chancellor of England; a man,” said he, “Peter (for Mr. More knows well what he was), that was not less venerable for his wisdom and virtues than for the high character he bore: he was of a middle stature, not broken with age; his looks begot reverence rather than fear; his conversation was easy, but serious and grave; he sometimes took pleasure to try the force of those that came as suitors to him upon business by speaking sharply, though decently, to them, and by that he discovered their spirit and presence of mind; with which he was much delighted when it did not grow up to impudence, as bearing a great resemblance to his own temper, and he looked on such persons as the fittest men for affairs. He spoke both gracefully and weightily; he was eminently skilled in the law, had a vast understanding, and a prodigious memory; and those excellent talents with which nature had furnished him were improved by study and experience. When I was in England the King depended much on his counsels, and the Government seemed to be chiefly supported by him; for from his youth he had been all along practised in affairs; and, having passed through many traverses of fortune, he had, with great cost, acquired a vast stock of wisdom, which is not soon lost when it is purchased so dear. One day, when I was dining with him, there happened to be at table one of the English lawyers, who took occasion to run out in a high commendation of the severe execution of justice upon thieves, ‘who,’ as he said, ‘were then hanged so fast that there were sometimes twenty on one gibbet!’ and, upon that, he said, ‘he could not wonder enough how it came to pass that, since so few escaped, there were yet so many thieves left, who were still robbing in all places.’ Upon this, I (who took the boldness to speak freely before the Cardinal) said, ‘There was no reason to wonder at the matter, since this way of punishing thieves was neither just in itself nor good for the public; for, as the severity was too great, so the remedy was not effectual; simple theft not being so great a crime that it ought to cost a man his life; no punishment, how severe soever, being able to restrain those from robbing who can find out no other way of livelihood. In this,’ said I, ‘not only you in England, but a great part of the world, imitate some ill masters, that are readier to chastise their scholars than to teach them. There are dreadful punishments enacted against thieves, but it were much better to make such good provisions by which every man might be put in a method how to live, and so be preserved from the fatal necessity of stealing and of dying for it.’ ‘There has been care enough taken for that,’ said he; ‘there are many handicrafts, and there is husbandry, by which they may make a shift to live, unless they have a greater mind to follow ill courses.’ ‘That will not serve your turn,’ said I, ‘for many lose their limbs in civil or foreign wars, as lately in the Cornish rebellion, and some time ago in your wars with France, who, being thus mutilated in the service of their king and country, can no more follow their old trades, and are too old to learn new ones; but since wars are only accidental things, and have intervals, let us consider those things that fall out every day. There is a great number of noblemen among you that are themselves as idle as drones, that subsist on other men’s labour, on the labour of their tenants, whom, to raise their revenues, they pare to the quick. This, indeed, is the only instance of their frugality, for in all other things they are prodigal, even to the beggaring of themselves; but, besides this, they carry about with them a great number of idle fellows, who never learned any art by which they may gain their living; and these, as soon as either their lord dies, or they themselves fall sick, are turned out of doors; for your lords are readier to feed idle people than to take care of the sick; and often the heir is not able to keep together so great a family as his predecessor did. Now, when the stomachs of those that are thus turned out of doors grow keen, they rob no less keenly; and what else can they do? For when, by wandering about, they have worn out both their health and their clothes, and are tattered, and look ghastly, men of quality will not entertain them, and poor men dare not do it, knowing that one who has been bred up in idleness and pleasure, and who was used to walk about with his sword and buckler, despising all the neighbourhood with an insolent scorn as far below him, is not fit for the spade and mattock; nor will he serve a poor man for so small a hire and in so low a diet as he can afford to give him.’ To this he answered, ‘This sort of men ought to be particularly cherished, for in them consists the force of the armies for which we have occasion; since their birth inspires them with a nobler sense of honour than is to be found among tradesmen or ploughmen.’ ‘You may as well say,’ replied I, ‘that you must cherish thieves on the account of wars, for you will never want the one as long as you have the other; and as robbers prove sometimes gallant soldiers, so soldiers often prove brave robbers, so near an alliance there is between those two sorts of life. But this bad custom, so common among you, of keeping many servants, is not peculiar to this nation. In France there is yet a more pestiferous sort of people, for the whole country is full of soldiers, still kept up in time of peace (if such a state of a nation can be called a peace); and these are kept in pay upon the same account that you plead for those idle retainers about noblemen: this being a maxim of those pretended statesmen, that it is necessary for the public safety to have a good body of veteran soldiers ever in readiness. They think raw men are not to be depended on, and they sometimes seek occasions for making war, that they may train up their soldiers in the art of cutting throats, or, as Sallust observed, “for keeping their hands in use, that they may not grow dull by too long an intermission.” But France has learned to its cost how dangerous it is to feed such beasts. The fate of the Romans, Carthaginians, and Syrians, and many other nations and cities, which were both overturned and quite ruined by those standing armies, should make others wiser; and the folly of this maxim of the French appears plainly even from this, that their trained soldiers often find your raw men prove too hard for them, of which I will not say much, lest you may think I flatter the English. Every day’s experience shows that the mechanics in the towns or the clowns in the country are not afraid of fighting with those idle gentlemen, if they are not disabled by some misfortune in their body or dispirited by extreme want; so that you need not fear that those well-shaped and strong men (for it is only such that noblemen love to keep about them till they spoil them), who now grow feeble with ease and are softened with their effeminate manner of life, would be less fit for action if they were well bred and well employed. And it seems very unreasonable that, for the prospect of a war, which you need never have but when you please, you should maintain so many idle men, as will always disturb you in time of peace, which is ever to be more considered than war. But I do not think that this necessity of stealing arises only from hence; there is another cause of it, more peculiar to England.’ ‘What is that?’ said the Cardinal: ‘The increase of pasture,’ said I, ‘by which your sheep, which are naturally mild, and easily kept in order, may be said now to devour men and unpeople, not only villages, but towns; for wherever it is found that the sheep of any soil yield a softer and richer wool than ordinary, there the nobility and gentry, and even those holy men, the abbots! not contented with the old rents which their farms yielded, nor thinking it enough that they, living at their ease, do no good to the public, resolve to do it hurt instead of good. They stop the course of agriculture, destroying houses and towns, reserving only the churches, and enclose grounds that they may lodge their sheep in them. As if forests and parks had swallowed up too little of the land, those worthy countrymen turn the best inhabited places into solitudes; for when an insatiable wretch, who is a plague to his country, resolves to enclose many thousand acres of ground, the owners, as well as tenants, are turned out of their possessions by trick or by main force, or, being wearied out by ill usage, they are forced to sell them; by which means those miserable people, both men and women, married and unmarried, old and young, with their poor but numerous families (since country business requires many hands), are all forced to change their seats, not knowing whither to go; and they must sell, almost for nothing, their household stuff, which could not bring them much money, even though they might stay for a buyer. When that little money is at an end (for it will be soon spent), what is left for them to do but either to steal, and so to be hanged (God knows how justly!), or to go about and beg? and if they do this they are put in prison as idle vagabonds, while they would willingly work but can find none that will hire them; for there is no more occasion for country labour, to which they have been bred, when there is no arable ground left. One shepherd can look after a flock, which will stock an extent of ground that would require many hands if it were to be ploughed and reaped. This, likewise, in many places raises the price of corn. The price of wool is also so risen that the poor people, who were wont to make cloth, are no more able to buy it; and this, likewise, makes many of them idle: for since the increase of pasture God has punished the avarice of the owners by a rot among the sheep, which has destroyed vast numbers of them—to us it might have seemed more just had it fell on the owners themselves. But, suppose the sheep should increase ever so much, their price is not likely to fall; since, though they cannot be called a monopoly, because they are not engrossed by one person, yet they are in so few hands, and these are so rich, that, as they are not pressed to sell them sooner than they have a mind to it, so they never do it till they have raised the price as high as possible. And on the same account it is that the other kinds of cattle are so dear, because many villages being pulled down, and all country labour being much neglected, there are none who make it their business to breed them. The rich do not breed cattle as they do sheep, but buy them lean and at low prices; and, after they have fattened them on their grounds, sell them again at high rates. And I do not think that all the inconveniences this will produce are yet observed; for, as they sell the cattle dear, so, if they are consumed faster than the breeding countries from which they are brought can afford them, then the stock must decrease, and this must needs end in great scarcity; and by these means, this your island, which seemed as to this particular the happiest in the world, will suffer much by the cursed avarice of a few persons: besides this, the rising of corn makes all people lessen their families as much as they can; and what can those who are dismissed by them do but either beg or rob? And to this last a man of a great mind is much sooner drawn than to the former. Luxury likewise breaks in apace upon you to set forward your poverty and misery; there is an excessive vanity in apparel, and great cost in diet, and that not only in noblemen’s families, but even among tradesmen, among the farmers themselves, and among all ranks of persons. You have also many infamous houses, and, besides those that are known, the taverns and ale-houses are no better; add to these dice, cards, tables, football, tennis, and quoits, in which money runs fast away; and those that are initiated into them must, in the conclusion, betake themselves to robbing for a supply. Banish these plagues, and give orders that those who have dispeopled so much soil may either rebuild the villages they have pulled down or let out their grounds to such as will do it; restrain those engrossings of the rich, that are as bad almost as monopolies; leave fewer occasions to idleness; let agriculture be set up again, and the manufacture of the wool be regulated, that so there may be work found for those companies of idle people whom want forces to be thieves, or who now, being idle vagabonds or useless servants, will certainly grow thieves at last. If you do not find a remedy to these evils it is a vain thing to boast of your severity in punishing theft, which, though it may have the appearance of justice, yet in itself is neither just nor convenient; for if you suffer your people to be ill-educated, and their manners to be corrupted from their infancy, and then punish them for those crimes to which their first education disposed them, what else is to be concluded from this but that you first make thieves and then punish them?’

“I was then very grateful to that respected church leader, John Morton, Archbishop of Canterbury, Cardinal, and Chancellor of England; a man,” he said, “Peter (because Mr. More knows well who he was), who was no less revered for his wisdom and virtues than for the high position he held: he was of average height, not bent by age; his appearance inspired respect rather than fear; his conversation was relaxed, yet serious and dignified; he sometimes enjoyed testing the resolve of those who came to him as petitioners by speaking sharply, though decently, to them, and through this, he revealed their character and composure, which he greatly admired as long as it didn’t turn into arrogance, viewing such people as the most suitable for dealing with important matters. He spoke both eloquently and weightily; he had a deep understanding of the law, an immense intellect, and a remarkable memory; and those excellent qualities that nature had given him were enhanced by learning and experience. When I was in England, the King relied heavily on his advice, and the Government seemed to be mainly supported by him; for he had been involved in politics from a young age, and having faced various ups and downs in fortune, he had, at great cost, gathered a wealth of wisdom, which is not easily forgotten when earned through hardship. One day, while I was having dinner with him, one of the English lawyers present began to rave about the harsh enforcement of justice against thieves, mentioning how quickly they were hanged, ‘so quickly,’ he said, ‘that there were sometimes twenty on one gallows!’ He wondered out loud how, since so few escaped, there were still so many thieves left who continued to rob everywhere. I, taking the liberty to speak freely in front of the Cardinal, said, ‘There’s no reason to be surprised, as this way of punishing thieves is neither just nor beneficial for society; because while the punishment is far too harsh, it is also ineffective; petty theft isn’t such a grave crime that it should cost a person their life; no punishment, however severe, can stop those from robbing who have no other means to survive. In this,’ I continued, ‘not only you in England but much of the world are following the example of poor teachers, who are quicker to punish their students than to guide them. There are harsh penalties enacted against thieves, yet it would be far better to provide good opportunities for every man, showing them a way to live, thereby protecting them from the desperate need to steal and from the fate that follows.’ ‘There has been enough effort put into that,’ he replied; ‘there are many trades, and there is farming, through which they can manage to live, unless they prefer to pursue bad choices.’ ‘That won’t work,’ I replied, ‘as many lose their limbs in civil or foreign wars, like recently in the Cornish rebellion, or in your wars with France some time ago; those who have been maimed while serving their king and country cannot return to their old jobs and are too old to learn new ones; but since wars are merely random events with intervals, let’s focus on the daily occurrences. Many noblemen among you are as idle as drones, living off the labor of others, particularly their tenants, whom they squeeze to increase their profits. This, indeed, is their only instance of thriftiness, for in all other matters they are extravagant, even to the point of impoverishing themselves; moreover, they keep around a large number of idle individuals who have never learned a trade to support themselves; and once their lord passes away or they become ill, they are quickly thrown out; for your lords prefer to support the idle rather than care for the sick, and often the heir cannot maintain the large household that his predecessor did. Now, when those who are thus cast out find themselves hungry, they steal just as eagerly; and what else can they do? When they have wandered about, wearing out both their health and clothing, looking ragged and desperate, men of status won’t take them in, and the poor are too afraid to help them, knowing that someone raised in idleness and luxury, who used to strut about with his sword and armor, looking down on everyone else with disdain, isn’t fit for hard labor; nor will he work for a poor person’s meager pay and low standard of living. To this, he responded, ‘Such individuals should be particularly supported, as they provide the strength for our armies when we need them; their birth gives them a greater sense of honor than is typically found among tradesmen or farmers.’ ‘You might as well argue,’ I replied, ‘that we should support thieves for the sake of war since you will never lack one as long as you have the other; and just as robbers can sometimes turn out to be brave soldiers, it’s just as true that soldiers often become bold robbers; there’s a close connection between the two lifestyles. But this negative habit of employing many servants isn’t unique to this nation. In France, there exists a far worse group of people; the entire country is filled with soldiers who are kept even during peacetime (if such a state can truly be called peace); they are maintained for the same reasons you give for those idle retainers of noblemen: it’s a belief among those so-called statesmen that a robust body of professional soldiers must always be ready for public safety. They think inexperienced fighters can’t be trusted, and they sometimes seek reason to engage in war, to train their soldiers in the art of killing, or, as Sallust remarked, “to keep their hands in practice, so they don’t dull from long breaks.” But France has learned the hard way how dangerous it is to support such creatures. The stories of how the Romans, Carthaginians, Syrians, and many other nations and cities were both overthrown and completely ruined by their standing armies should serve as a lesson to others; and the folly of this belief seen in France is evident, for their professional soldiers often find that your inexperienced fighters prove too strong for them, about which I won’t say much, lest you think I’m flattering the English. Daily experiences illustrate that the workers in the towns or the laborers in the fields aren’t afraid to fight those idle gentlemen, if they aren’t hindered by some affliction or discouraged by extreme poverty; so there is no reason to worry that those strong and well-built men (for it is only such that noblemen seek to keep around until they ruin them), who now weaken from a life of ease and are softened by their effeminate lifestyle, would be less prepared for duty if they were properly raised and employed. Moreover, it seems completely unreasonable that, in planning for a war that you can avoid at will, you should maintain so many idle men who will only cause you trouble during times of peace, which should always be prioritized over war. But I don't think this necessity for stealing stems from only that; there's another cause unique to England.’ ‘What’s that?’ asked the Cardinal. ‘The increase in pastures,’ I replied, ‘which allows your sheep, which are naturally gentle and easy to manage, to be said to now consume people and depopulate not just villages but towns; wherever it’s discovered that the sheep in any area produce softer and richer wool, the nobility and gentry, and even those holy men, the abbots! not satisfied with the old rents their farms provided, nor thinking it enough that they live comfortably without contributing to society, decide to harm it instead. They halt agricultural progress, destroying homes and towns, preserving only the churches, and enclosing lands solely for their sheep. As if forests and parks hadn't consumed enough land already, these worthy landowners turn the most populated areas into wastelands; for when an insatiable scoundrel, who is a blight on his community, decides to enclose thousands of acres, both the owners and tenants are forced out of their properties by trickery or by force, or, being worn down by mistreatment, they are compelled to sell; leading to the displacement of those unfortunate individuals, both men and women, married and single, old and young, along with their struggling but numerous families (since farm work requires many hands), all forced to find new homes with no idea where to go; and they must sell their household items for almost nothing, which wouldn’t fetch them much cash even if they waited for a buyer. When that little money runs out (which it will quickly), what options are left for them other than to steal and face the gallows (who knows how justly!), or to go and beg? And if they resort to begging, they are thrown in prison as idle vagabonds, even though they would be more than willing to work if they could just find someone to hire them; for there is no longer any demand for farm labor, which they are trained for, when there is no arable land available. One shepherd can tend to a flock, which would otherwise require many hands for plowing and harvesting. This also raises the price of grain in many places. The price of wool has risen so high that the poor who used to make cloth can no longer afford it; and this leaves many of them idle as well: for since the rise in pasture, God has punished the greed of the owners with a disease among the sheep, which has killed vast numbers of them – it seems more just that it should have affected the owners instead. But, suppose the sheep multiply significantly; their price isn’t likely to drop; because, although they can’t be called a monopoly as they aren’t owned by just one person, they are in so few hands, and those hands are so wealthy that, since they aren’t pressured to sell until they choose, they rarely do so until they’ve pushed the price as high as possible. The same goes for other types of livestock, which are expensive because many villages have been destroyed, and all rural labor is significantly neglected; there’s no one who makes it their mission to raise them. The rich don’t raise cattle like they do sheep; they buy them when they’re lean and cheap, fatten them on their own land, and then sell them for high prices. I doubt that all the problems this creates have been fully recognized; for, as they sell cattle at high prices, if they consume them faster than the breeding areas can provide, then the stock must decrease, leading to significant scarcity; and through this, your island, which once seemed the happiest in the world in this regard, will suffer greatly from the cursed greed of a few: furthermore, the rising price of grain forces all to reduce their households as much as possible; and what can those dismissed do other than either beg or steal? And to this last, a person with a strong will is far more easily inclined than to the former. Additionally, luxury is creeping in quickly to fuel your poverty and suffering; there’s excessive vanity in clothing, extravagant costs in food, and this isn’t just among noble families but even among tradesmen, farmers, and across all social classes. You also have many disreputable establishments, and aside from those commonly known, the taverns and alehouses are no better; add to this gambling, card games, tables, football, tennis, and quoits, which all drain money quickly; and those caught up in these activities will eventually resort to theft to keep afloat. Eliminate these plagues, and order those who have depopulated so much land to either rebuild the villages they’ve destroyed or lease their lands to those who will, restrict the hoarding of the wealthy, which is almost as bad as monopolies; provide fewer opportunities for idleness; revive agriculture and regulate wool production, so that there may be work found for those groups of idle people whom want can easily turn into thieves, or who currently, being idle vagabonds or useless servants, will inevitably become thieves in time. If you don’t find a solution to these problems, it is pointless to boast about your harsh punishments for theft, which may seem just on the surface, but really isn’t either fair or practical; because if you allow your people to grow up poorly educated and their morals to be corrupted from childhood, and then punish them for crimes they were conditioned to commit from their upbringing, what else can you conclude but that you first create thieves and then punish them?’

“While I was talking thus, the Counsellor, who was present, had prepared an answer, and had resolved to resume all I had said, according to the formality of a debate, in which things are generally repeated more faithfully than they are answered, as if the chief trial to be made were of men’s memories. ‘You have talked prettily, for a stranger,’ said he, ‘having heard of many things among us which you have not been able to consider well; but I will make the whole matter plain to you, and will first repeat in order all that you have said; then I will show how much your ignorance of our affairs has misled you; and will, in the last place, answer all your arguments. And, that I may begin where I promised, there were four things—’ ‘Hold your peace!’ said the Cardinal; ‘this will take up too much time; therefore we will, at present, ease you of the trouble of answering, and reserve it to our next meeting, which shall be to-morrow, if Raphael’s affairs and yours can admit of it. But, Raphael,’ said he to me, ‘I would gladly know upon what reason it is that you think theft ought not to be punished by death: would you give way to it? or do you propose any other punishment that will be more useful to the public? for, since death does not restrain theft, if men thought their lives would be safe, what fear or force could restrain ill men? On the contrary, they would look on the mitigation of the punishment as an invitation to commit more crimes.’ I answered, ‘It seems to me a very unjust thing to take away a man’s life for a little money, for nothing in the world can be of equal value with a man’s life: and if it be said, “that it is not for the money that one suffers, but for his breaking the law,” I must say, extreme justice is an extreme injury: for we ought not to approve of those terrible laws that make the smallest offences capital, nor of that opinion of the Stoics that makes all crimes equal; as if there were no difference to be made between the killing a man and the taking his purse, between which, if we examine things impartially, there is no likeness nor proportion. God has commanded us not to kill, and shall we kill so easily for a little money? But if one shall say, that by that law we are only forbid to kill any except when the laws of the land allow of it, upon the same grounds, laws may be made, in some cases, to allow of adultery and perjury: for God having taken from us the right of disposing either of our own or of other people’s lives, if it is pretended that the mutual consent of men in making laws can authorise man-slaughter in cases in which God has given us no example, that it frees people from the obligation of the divine law, and so makes murder a lawful action, what is this, but to give a preference to human laws before the divine? and, if this is once admitted, by the same rule men may, in all other things, put what restrictions they please upon the laws of God. If, by the Mosaical law, though it was rough and severe, as being a yoke laid on an obstinate and servile nation, men were only fined, and not put to death for theft, we cannot imagine, that in this new law of mercy, in which God treats us with the tenderness of a father, He has given us a greater licence to cruelty than He did to the Jews. Upon these reasons it is, that I think putting thieves to death is not lawful; and it is plain and obvious that it is absurd and of ill consequence to the commonwealth that a thief and a murderer should be equally punished; for if a robber sees that his danger is the same if he is convicted of theft as if he were guilty of murder, this will naturally incite him to kill the person whom otherwise he would only have robbed; since, if the punishment is the same, there is more security, and less danger of discovery, when he that can best make it is put out of the way; so that terrifying thieves too much provokes them to cruelty.

“While I was speaking, the Counsellor, who was there, had prepared a response and decided to summarize everything I had said, following the formal style of a debate, where people usually repeat things more accurately than they respond, as if testing people’s memories. ‘You’ve spoken well for an outsider,’ he said, ‘having heard many things from us that you haven’t fully considered; but I will clarify everything for you. First, I will repeat in order all that you have stated; then I will demonstrate how much your lack of understanding of our issues has misguided you; and finally, I will address all your arguments. Now, to start where I promised, there are four points—’ ‘Be quiet!’ said the Cardinal; ‘this will take too long, so we’ll relieve you of the burden of responding now, and we’ll save it for our next meeting, which can be tomorrow, if Raphael’s matters and yours allow for it. But, Raphael,’ he said to me, ‘I’d really like to know why you believe theft shouldn’t be punished by death: do you think it should be allowed, or do you suggest another punishment that would be better for society? Because since death doesn’t stop theft, if people thought their lives were safe, what fear or constraint could deter wrongdoers? Conversely, they would see a lighter punishment as an invitation to commit even more crimes.’ I responded, ‘It seems very unjust to take a person’s life for a small amount of money, because nothing is as valuable as a human life. And if someone argues that it’s not really for the money that someone suffers, but for breaking the law, I must say that extreme justice can be an extreme harm. We shouldn’t support those harsh laws that make the smallest offenses punishable by death, nor the Stoic belief that treats all crimes the same; as if there’s no difference between killing a person and stealing from them. If we look at it fairly, there’s no similarity or proportion. God has commanded us not to kill, so should we really kill so easily for a little money? But if someone argues that we are only forbidden to kill except when the laws allow it, laws could similarly be made to permit adultery and perjury. For if God has taken away our right to control our own lives or the lives of others, then claiming that people can give each other rights through laws makes killing lawful where God has not given an example; this prioritizes human laws over divine ones. If we accept this, then people can impose any restrictions they want on God's laws in other areas too. If, under Mosaic law, which was harsh and strict for an obstinate and servile nation, people were only fined for theft and not executed, we can’t assume that in this new law of mercy, where God treats us as a father, He has given us a greater allowance for cruelty than He did to the Jews. Because of these reasons, I believe that executing thieves is not lawful; and it’s clear that punishing a thief and a murderer equally is irrational and harmful to society. If a robber realizes that the risk is the same for being caught for theft as murder, he’s likely to kill the person he would otherwise just rob, since if the punishment is the same, there’s more safety and less chance of getting caught when the person who could testify against him is eliminated. So, excessively frightening thieves only pushes them towards greater brutality.”

“But as to the question, ‘What more convenient way of punishment can be found?’ I think it much easier to find out that than to invent anything that is worse; why should we doubt but the way that was so long in use among the old Romans, who understood so well the arts of government, was very proper for their punishment? They condemned such as they found guilty of great crimes to work their whole lives in quarries, or to dig in mines with chains about them. But the method that I liked best was that which I observed in my travels in Persia, among the Polylerits, who are a considerable and well-governed people: they pay a yearly tribute to the King of Persia, but in all other respects they are a free nation, and governed by their own laws: they lie far from the sea, and are environed with hills; and, being contented with the productions of their own country, which is very fruitful, they have little commerce with any other nation; and as they, according to the genius of their country, have no inclination to enlarge their borders, so their mountains and the pension they pay to the Persian, secure them from all invasions. Thus they have no wars among them; they live rather conveniently than with splendour, and may be rather called a happy nation than either eminent or famous; for I do not think that they are known, so much as by name, to any but their next neighbours. Those that are found guilty of theft among them are bound to make restitution to the owner, and not, as it is in other places, to the prince, for they reckon that the prince has no more right to the stolen goods than the thief; but if that which was stolen is no more in being, then the goods of the thieves are estimated, and restitution being made out of them, the remainder is given to their wives and children; and they themselves are condemned to serve in the public works, but are neither imprisoned nor chained, unless there happens to be some extraordinary circumstance in their crimes. They go about loose and free, working for the public: if they are idle or backward to work they are whipped, but if they work hard they are well used and treated without any mark of reproach; only the lists of them are called always at night, and then they are shut up. They suffer no other uneasiness but this of constant labour; for, as they work for the public, so they are well entertained out of the public stock, which is done differently in different places: in some places whatever is bestowed on them is raised by a charitable contribution; and, though this way may seem uncertain, yet so merciful are the inclinations of that people, that they are plentifully supplied by it; but in other places public revenues are set aside for them, or there is a constant tax or poll-money raised for their maintenance. In some places they are set to no public work, but every private man that has occasion to hire workmen goes to the market-places and hires them of the public, a little lower than he would do a freeman. If they go lazily about their task he may quicken them with the whip. By this means there is always some piece of work or other to be done by them; and, besides their livelihood, they earn somewhat still to the public. They all wear a peculiar habit, of one certain colour, and their hair is cropped a little above their ears, and a piece of one of their ears is cut off. Their friends are allowed to give them either meat, drink, or clothes, so they are of their proper colour; but it is death, both to the giver and taker, if they give them money; nor is it less penal for any freeman to take money from them upon any account whatsoever: and it is also death for any of these slaves (so they are called) to handle arms. Those of every division of the country are distinguished by a peculiar mark, which it is capital for them to lay aside, to go out of their bounds, or to talk with a slave of another jurisdiction, and the very attempt of an escape is no less penal than an escape itself. It is death for any other slave to be accessory to it; and if a freeman engages in it he is condemned to slavery. Those that discover it are rewarded—if freemen, in money; and if slaves, with liberty, together with a pardon for being accessory to it; that so they might find their account rather in repenting of their engaging in such a design than in persisting in it.

“But regarding the question, ‘What more convenient way of punishment can be found?’ I think it's much easier to determine that than to come up with something worse. Why should we doubt that the method used by the ancient Romans, who were skilled in governance, was quite appropriate for punishment? They sentenced those found guilty of serious crimes to work their entire lives in quarries or to dig in mines with chains on them. However, the method I liked best was one I observed during my travels in Persia among the Polylerits, who are a significant and well-managed people. They pay a yearly tribute to the King of Persia, but in every other respect, they are a free nation governed by their own laws. They are far from the sea and surrounded by hills; content with their own fruitful land, they have little trade with other nations. Because they have no desire to expand their territory, and thanks to their mountains and the tribute they pay to the Persians, they are safe from invasions. Thus, they have no internal wars; they live comfortably rather than lavishly, and can be considered a happy nation rather than one that is prominent or famous—most people know them only by name, if at all, beyond their immediate neighbors. Those guilty of theft among them are required to compensate the owner rather than, as in other places, the prince, since they believe the prince has no more claim to the stolen goods than the thief does. If the stolen item no longer exists, then the thief’s belongings are valued, and restitution is made from them, with the remainder given to their spouses and children. The thieves themselves are sentenced to public work but are not imprisoned or chained unless there are extraordinary circumstances regarding their crimes. They work freely for the public: if they are lazy or reluctant to work, they are whipped, but if they give their best effort, they are treated well without any stigma. Their names are called each night, and then they are confined. Their only discomfort comes from the constant labor; however, since they work for the public, they are well-supported from public resources, which varies by location: in some places, whatever is provided comes from charitable donations, which, despite seeming unpredictable, is generously supplied due to the people's kindness, while in other areas, public funds are designated for them or a regular tax is imposed to support their maintenance. In some regions, they aren’t assigned to public work; rather, private individuals needing to hire workers go to the market and hire them for a lesser rate than they would pay a free person. If they work slowly, the employer can urge them on with a whip. This way, there is always work for them to do, allowing them to contribute to their own livelihood while still benefiting the public. They all wear a specific uniform of one color, their hair is cut just above their ears, and a part of one ear is cut off. Friends can provide them with food, drink, or clothing as long as it's in the right color; however, giving them money is punishable by death for both the giver and the receiver. It is equally punishable for any free person to accept money from them for any reason: it is also a capital offense for any of these slaves (as they are called) to handle weapons. Each group in the country has a unique identifier, and it is a serious crime for them to remove it, leave their area, or communicate with a slave from another jurisdiction; even attempting to escape is as punishable as a successful escape. It is a death sentence for any other slave to assist in this, and if a free person gets involved, they are condemned to slavery. Those who report it are rewarded—with money if they are free, or with freedom and a pardon if they are slaves—so they might see the benefit in regretting their involvement rather than pursuing such an endeavor.”

“These are their laws and rules in relation to robbery, and it is obvious that they are as advantageous as they are mild and gentle; since vice is not only destroyed and men preserved, but they are treated in such a manner as to make them see the necessity of being honest and of employing the rest of their lives in repairing the injuries they had formerly done to society. Nor is there any hazard of their falling back to their old customs; and so little do travellers apprehend mischief from them that they generally make use of them for guides from one jurisdiction to another; for there is nothing left them by which they can rob or be the better for it, since, as they are disarmed, so the very having of money is a sufficient conviction: and as they are certainly punished if discovered, so they cannot hope to escape; for their habit being in all the parts of it different from what is commonly worn, they cannot fly away, unless they would go naked, and even then their cropped ear would betray them. The only danger to be feared from them is their conspiring against the government; but those of one division and neighbourhood can do nothing to any purpose unless a general conspiracy were laid amongst all the slaves of the several jurisdictions, which cannot be done, since they cannot meet or talk together; nor will any venture on a design where the concealment would be so dangerous and the discovery so profitable. None are quite hopeless of recovering their freedom, since by their obedience and patience, and by giving good grounds to believe that they will change their manner of life for the future, they may expect at last to obtain their liberty, and some are every year restored to it upon the good character that is given of them. When I had related all this, I added that I did not see why such a method might not be followed with more advantage than could ever be expected from that severe justice which the Counsellor magnified so much. To this he answered, ‘That it could never take place in England without endangering the whole nation.’ As he said this he shook his head, made some grimaces, and held his peace, while all the company seemed of his opinion, except the Cardinal, who said, ‘That it was not easy to form a judgment of its success, since it was a method that never yet had been tried; but if,’ said he, ‘when sentence of death were passed upon a thief, the prince would reprieve him for a while, and make the experiment upon him, denying him the privilege of a sanctuary; and then, if it had a good effect upon him, it might take place; and, if it did not succeed, the worst would be to execute the sentence on the condemned persons at last; and I do not see,’ added he, ‘why it would be either unjust, inconvenient, or at all dangerous to admit of such a delay; in my opinion the vagabonds ought to be treated in the same manner, against whom, though we have made many laws, yet we have not been able to gain our end.’ When the Cardinal had done, they all commended the motion, though they had despised it when it came from me, but more particularly commended what related to the vagabonds, because it was his own observation.

“These are their laws and rules regarding theft, and it’s clear that they are as beneficial as they are gentle; since not only is wrongdoing eradicated and people protected, but they are treated in a way that helps them understand the importance of being honest and dedicating the rest of their lives to making amends for the harm they have caused society. There’s also no risk of them reverting to their old habits; travelers feel so safe around them that they often use them as guides between regions, because they've got nothing left to steal or benefit from. They are disarmed, and just possessing money is enough to convict them. Since they are definitely punished if caught, they know there’s no chance of escaping; their clothing is so different from what people usually wear that they can't run away without being noticed, even if they were to go naked, since their cropped ear would give them away. The only threat to be concerned about comes from them plotting against the government, but groups from different areas can’t coordinate unless there’s a widespread conspiracy among all the slaves of the various jurisdictions, which isn’t possible because they can’t meet or communicate. Plus, no one would risk a plan that would be so dangerous to hide and so profitable to discover. None of them are completely without hope of regaining their freedom; with their obedience and patience, and by showing good reasons to believe that they will change their ways, they might eventually gain their liberty, and some are restored to it every year thanks to the good character given to them. After I had shared all this, I mentioned that I didn't see why such a method couldn't be followed with more advantage than the harsh justice the Counsellor praised so highly. He replied, ‘That could never happen in England without endangering the entire nation.’ As he said this, he shook his head, made some grimaces, and fell silent, while everyone else seemed to agree with him, except the Cardinal who remarked, ‘It’s hard to judge its success since it’s a method that’s never been tried before; but if,’ he said, ‘when a thief is sentenced to death, the prince were to give him a reprieve for a while and try this method, denying him sanctuary, and if it had a positive effect on him, it could be implemented; and if it didn’t work, the worst would be to execute the sentence on the condemned in the end; and I don’t see,’ he added, ‘why it would be unjust, inconvenient, or dangerous to allow such a delay. In my opinion, vagabonds should be treated the same way, because despite our many laws against them, we still haven’t achieved our goal.’ Once the Cardinal finished, everyone praised the idea, even though they had dismissed it when I first proposed it, but they particularly appreciated what he said about dealing with vagabonds since it was his observation.”

“I do not know whether it be worth while to tell what followed, for it was very ridiculous; but I shall venture at it, for as it is not foreign to this matter, so some good use may be made of it. There was a Jester standing by, that counterfeited the fool so naturally that he seemed to be really one; the jests which he offered were so cold and dull that we laughed more at him than at them, yet sometimes he said, as it were by chance, things that were not unpleasant, so as to justify the old proverb, ‘That he who throws the dice often, will sometimes have a lucky hit.’ When one of the company had said that I had taken care of the thieves, and the Cardinal had taken care of the vagabonds, so that there remained nothing but that some public provision might be made for the poor whom sickness or old age had disabled from labour, ‘Leave that to me,’ said the Fool, ‘and I shall take care of them, for there is no sort of people whose sight I abhor more, having been so often vexed with them and with their sad complaints; but as dolefully soever as they have told their tale, they could never prevail so far as to draw one penny from me; for either I had no mind to give them anything, or, when I had a mind to do it, I had nothing to give them; and they now know me so well that they will not lose their labour, but let me pass without giving me any trouble, because they hope for nothing—no more, in faith, than if I were a priest; but I would have a law made for sending all these beggars to monasteries, the men to the Benedictines, to be made lay-brothers, and the women to be nuns.’ The Cardinal smiled, and approved of it in jest, but the rest liked it in earnest. There was a divine present, who, though he was a grave morose man, yet he was so pleased with this reflection that was made on the priests and the monks that he began to play with the Fool, and said to him, ‘This will not deliver you from all beggars, except you take care of us Friars.’ ‘That is done already,’ answered the Fool, ‘for the Cardinal has provided for you by what he proposed for restraining vagabonds and setting them to work, for I know no vagabonds like you.’ This was well entertained by the whole company, who, looking at the Cardinal, perceived that he was not ill-pleased at it; only the Friar himself was vexed, as may be easily imagined, and fell into such a passion that he could not forbear railing at the Fool, and calling him knave, slanderer, backbiter, and son of perdition, and then cited some dreadful threatenings out of the Scriptures against him. Now the Jester thought he was in his element, and laid about him freely. ‘Good Friar,’ said he, ‘be not angry, for it is written, “In patience possess your soul.”’ The Friar answered (for I shall give you his own words), ‘I am not angry, you hangman; at least, I do not sin in it, for the Psalmist says, “Be ye angry and sin not.”’ Upon this the Cardinal admonished him gently, and wished him to govern his passions. ‘No, my lord,’ said he, ‘I speak not but from a good zeal, which I ought to have, for holy men have had a good zeal, as it is said, “The zeal of thy house hath eaten me up;” and we sing in our church that those who mocked Elisha as he went up to the house of God felt the effects of his zeal, which that mocker, that rogue, that scoundrel, will perhaps feel.’ ‘You do this, perhaps, with a good intention,’ said the Cardinal, ‘but, in my opinion, it were wiser in you, and perhaps better for you, not to engage in so ridiculous a contest with a Fool.’ ‘No, my lord,’ answered he, ‘that were not wisely done, for Solomon, the wisest of men, said, “Answer a Fool according to his folly,” which I now do, and show him the ditch into which he will fall, if he is not aware of it; for if the many mockers of Elisha, who was but one bald man, felt the effect of his zeal, what will become of the mocker of so many Friars, among whom there are so many bald men? We have, likewise, a bull, by which all that jeer us are excommunicated.’ When the Cardinal saw that there was no end of this matter he made a sign to the Fool to withdraw, turned the discourse another way, and soon after rose from the table, and, dismissing us, went to hear causes.

“I’m not sure if it’s worth sharing what happened next because it was pretty silly; but I’ll go ahead anyway since it relates to the topic, and maybe it’ll serve some purpose. There was a Jester nearby, who acted like a fool so convincingly that he seemed like one for real; his jokes were so dull and flat that we ended up laughing more at him than at the jokes themselves, yet sometimes he would randomly say things that weren’t unpleasant, proving the old saying, ‘He who rolls the dice often will occasionally hit the jackpot.’ When someone pointed out that I had taken care of the thieves and the Cardinal had managed the vagabonds, leaving only the need to provide for the poor who couldn’t work due to illness or old age, the Fool said, ‘Leave that to me, I’ll handle it, because there’s no group I dislike more than them; they’ve bothered me too often with their sad stories. Even when they told their tales in the most sorrowful ways, they never got a penny from me; either I didn’t want to give them anything, or when I did want to, I had nothing to give. Now they know me well enough not to bother trying; they just let me go without making a fuss, because they don’t expect anything—about as much as they would if I were a priest; but I’d like to make a law to send all these beggars to monasteries, the men to the Benedictines as lay-brothers, and the women to be nuns.’ The Cardinal smiled and joked about it, but the others took him seriously. There was a religious figure present, a serious man, who found this comment about the priests and monks amusing enough that he began to engage with the Fool, saying, ‘This won’t get you rid of all the beggars unless you include us Friars too.’ ‘That’s already taken care of,’ the Fool replied, ‘because the Cardinal has provided for you through his plan to control vagabonds and put them to work, since I don’t know any vagabonds quite like you.’ This got a good reaction from the whole group, who glanced at the Cardinal and saw he wasn’t displeased; only the Friar was upset, as you might expect, and he got so angry that he couldn’t help but yell at the Fool, calling him a knave, slanderer, backbiter, and son of perdition, while also quoting some harsh threats from the Scriptures against him. The Jester, seeing he was in his element, responded freely. ‘Good Friar,’ he said, ‘don’t be angry, for it’s written, “In patience possess your soul.”’ The Friar countered (I’ll quote his exact words), ‘I’m not angry, you executioner; at least, I’m not sinning in it, because the Psalmist says, “Be ye angry and sin not.”’ At this, the Cardinal gently advised him to control his temper. ‘No, my lord,’ he replied, ‘I’m only speaking from good zeal, which I ought to have, because holy men have had a good zeal, as it’s said, “The zeal of thy house has consumed me;” and we sing in our church that those who mocked Elisha when he went to the house of God felt the consequences of his zeal, which that mocker, that rogue, that scoundrel, may also feel.’ ‘You might be doing this with good intentions,’ said the Cardinal, ‘but it seems wiser and better for you not to engage in such a ridiculous battle with a Fool.’ ‘No, my lord,’ he responded, ‘that wouldn’t be wise, because Solomon, the wisest of men, said, “Answer a Fool according to his folly,” which I’m doing now and showing him the pit he’ll fall into if he isn’t careful; for if the many mockers of Elisha, who was just one bald man, felt the consequences of his zeal, what will happen to the mocker of so many Friars, among whom there are many bald men? We also have a bull stating that anyone who mocks us is excommunicated.’ When the Cardinal saw there was no end in sight, he signaled for the Fool to step back, shifted the conversation to something else, and soon after stood up from the table, dismissing us to handle court cases.

“Thus, Mr. More, I have run out into a tedious story, of the length of which I had been ashamed, if (as you earnestly begged it of me) I had not observed you to hearken to it as if you had no mind to lose any part of it. I might have contracted it, but I resolved to give it you at large, that you might observe how those that despised what I had proposed, no sooner perceived that the Cardinal did not dislike it but presently approved of it, fawned so on him and flattered him to such a degree, that they in good earnest applauded those things that he only liked in jest; and from hence you may gather how little courtiers would value either me or my counsels.”

“Therefore, Mr. More, I've shared a lengthy story, one I would have been embarrassed about if you hadn’t listened to it as if you were eager to hear every bit. I could have shortened it, but I chose to give you the whole account so you could see how those who dismissed my proposal suddenly changed their tune when they saw that the Cardinal actually liked it. They immediately began to flatter him and praise the very things he only joked about liking, which shows how little courtiers really think of me or my advice.”

To this I answered, “You have done me a great kindness in this relation; for as everything has been related by you both wisely and pleasantly, so you have made me imagine that I was in my own country and grown young again, by recalling that good Cardinal to my thoughts, in whose family I was bred from my childhood; and though you are, upon other accounts, very dear to me, yet you are the dearer because you honour his memory so much; but, after all this, I cannot change my opinion, for I still think that if you could overcome that aversion which you have to the courts of princes, you might, by the advice which it is in your power to give, do a great deal of good to mankind, and this is the chief design that every good man ought to propose to himself in living; for your friend Plato thinks that nations will be happy when either philosophers become kings or kings become philosophers. It is no wonder if we are so far from that happiness while philosophers will not think it their duty to assist kings with their counsels.” “They are not so base-minded,” said he, “but that they would willingly do it; many of them have already done it by their books, if those that are in power would but hearken to their good advice. But Plato judged right, that except kings themselves became philosophers, they who from their childhood are corrupted with false notions would never fall in entirely with the counsels of philosophers, and this he himself found to be true in the person of Dionysius.

To this, I replied, “You’ve done me a huge favor by sharing this with me; since everything you've said has been both wise and enjoyable, you’ve made me feel like I was back in my own country and young again by bringing back memories of that good Cardinal, who raised me since childhood. And although you are very dear to me for many reasons, I hold you even closer to my heart because you honor his memory so much. But despite all this, I can’t change my view, as I still believe that if you could get past your dislike of royal courts, you could do a lot of good for humanity with the advice you have to offer. This should be the main goal that every good person aims for in life; Plato believed that nations would be happy when either philosophers become kings or kings become philosophers. It’s no surprise we’re so far from that happiness when philosophers don’t think it’s their duty to help kings with their advice.” “They’re not so narrow-minded,” he said, “that they wouldn’t be willing to do so; many have already contributed through their writings, if only those in power would listen to their wise counsel. But Plato was right to say that unless kings become philosophers themselves, those who have been corrupted by false ideas since childhood will never fully embrace the advice of philosophers, and he learned this firsthand through Dionysius."

“Do not you think that if I were about any king, proposing good laws to him, and endeavouring to root out all the cursed seeds of evil that I found in him, I should either be turned out of his court, or, at least, be laughed at for my pains? For instance, what could I signify if I were about the King of France, and were called into his cabinet council, where several wise men, in his hearing, were proposing many expedients; as, by what arts and practices Milan may be kept, and Naples, that has so often slipped out of their hands, recovered; how the Venetians, and after them the rest of Italy, may be subdued; and then how Flanders, Brabant, and all Burgundy, and some other kingdoms which he has swallowed already in his designs, may be added to his empire? One proposes a league with the Venetians, to be kept as long as he finds his account in it, and that he ought to communicate counsels with them, and give them some share of the spoil till his success makes him need or fear them less, and then it will be easily taken out of their hands; another proposes the hiring the Germans and the securing the Switzers by pensions; another proposes the gaining the Emperor by money, which is omnipotent with him; another proposes a peace with the King of Arragon, and, in order to cement it, the yielding up the King of Navarre’s pretensions; another thinks that the Prince of Castile is to be wrought on by the hope of an alliance, and that some of his courtiers are to be gained to the French faction by pensions. The hardest point of all is, what to do with England; a treaty of peace is to be set on foot, and, if their alliance is not to be depended on, yet it is to be made as firm as possible, and they are to be called friends, but suspected as enemies: therefore the Scots are to be kept in readiness to be let loose upon England on every occasion; and some banished nobleman is to be supported underhand (for by the League it cannot be done avowedly) who has a pretension to the crown, by which means that suspected prince may be kept in awe. Now when things are in so great a fermentation, and so many gallant men are joining counsels how to carry on the war, if so mean a man as I should stand up and wish them to change all their counsels—to let Italy alone and stay at home, since the kingdom of France was indeed greater than could be well governed by one man; that therefore he ought not to think of adding others to it; and if, after this, I should propose to them the resolutions of the Achorians, a people that lie on the south-east of Utopia, who long ago engaged in war in order to add to the dominions of their prince another kingdom, to which he had some pretensions by an ancient alliance: this they conquered, but found that the trouble of keeping it was equal to that by which it was gained; that the conquered people were always either in rebellion or exposed to foreign invasions, while they were obliged to be incessantly at war, either for or against them, and consequently could never disband their army; that in the meantime they were oppressed with taxes, their money went out of the kingdom, their blood was spilt for the glory of their king without procuring the least advantage to the people, who received not the smallest benefit from it even in time of peace; and that, their manners being corrupted by a long war, robbery and murders everywhere abounded, and their laws fell into contempt; while their king, distracted with the care of two kingdoms, was the less able to apply his mind to the interest of either. When they saw this, and that there would be no end to these evils, they by joint counsels made an humble address to their king, desiring him to choose which of the two kingdoms he had the greatest mind to keep, since he could not hold both; for they were too great a people to be governed by a divided king, since no man would willingly have a groom that should be in common between him and another. Upon which the good prince was forced to quit his new kingdom to one of his friends (who was not long after dethroned), and to be contented with his old one. To this I would add that after all those warlike attempts, the vast confusions, and the consumption both of treasure and of people that must follow them, perhaps upon some misfortune they might be forced to throw up all at last; therefore it seemed much more eligible that the king should improve his ancient kingdom all he could, and make it flourish as much as possible; that he should love his people, and be beloved of them; that he should live among them, govern them gently and let other kingdoms alone, since that which had fallen to his share was big enough, if not too big, for him:—pray, how do you think would such a speech as this be heard?”

"Don't you think that if I were with any king, trying to suggest good laws and working to remove all the bad things I saw in him, I would either be kicked out of his court or, at the very least, laughed at for my efforts? For example, what impact would I have if I were with the King of France, sitting in his council where several wise men are proposing various strategies? They're discussing how to maintain Milan, recover Naples—which has slipped from their grasp so many times—how to conquer the Venetians and then the rest of Italy, and how to add Flanders, Brabant, all of Burgundy, and other kingdoms already in his sights to his empire. One suggests forming a league with the Venetians, to last as long as it benefits him, advising that he should share some of the spoils with them until he no longer needs or fears them, at which point he can easily take control. Another proposes hiring Germans and securing the Swiss with pensions. Yet another suggests winning over the Emperor with money, which holds power over him; another thinks a peace treaty with the King of Aragon is necessary, proposing to give up the King of Navarre’s claims to solidify it. Another suggests that the Prince of Castile could be persuaded with the prospect of an alliance and that some of his courtiers could be swayed to the French side with pay. The toughest issue is what to do about England; a peace treaty should be initiated, and even if their alliance isn't reliable, it should be made as solid as possible, calling them friends while treating them as suspected enemies. So, the Scots should be kept ready to strike at England whenever possible, and some exiled nobleman should be covertly supported (since the League doesn't allow it openly) who has a claim to the crown, thereby keeping that suspected prince in check. Now, when tensions are so high and so many capable men are discussing how to carry on the war, if someone as insignificant as me were to stand up and urge them to completely change their plans—to ignore Italy and stay home, since the kingdom of France is already too vast for one person to manage; that he shouldn't think about adding more territories—if, after that, I suggested they consider the situation of the Achorians, a people in the southeast of Utopia who long ago engaged in war to gain another kingdom to which their prince had some old claims, which they conquered but found the burden of keeping it was as troublesome as the conquest itself; that the conquered people were always rebelling or vulnerable to foreign attacks, forcing them into perpetual warfare either for or against them, preventing them from disbanding their army; that in the meantime they were weighed down by taxes, their wealth leaving the kingdom, and their blood spilled for their king’s glory without any real benefit to the people, who saw no gain even in peace; and that their morals were decaying from a long war, with crime and murders rampant, and their laws disregarded; while their king, divided by concerns for two kingdoms, was less able to focus on the needs of either. When they realized this, and that there would be no end to these problems, they collectively approached their king, humbly asking him to choose which of the two kingdoms he wanted to keep, since he couldn't hold both; because they were too large a people to be ruled by a divided king, as no one would willingly share their groom with another. So, the good prince was forced to give up his new kingdom to one of his friends (who was soon dethroned) and settle for his old one. I would also add that after all those military efforts, the immense chaos, and the drain on both resources and lives that would follow, they might ultimately be forced to relinquish everything due to misfortune; therefore, it seemed much better for the king to enhance and prosper his original kingdom as much as possible; to love and be loved by his people; to live among them, govern gently, and leave other kingdoms alone, since what he had was big enough—if not too big—for him. So, how do you think a speech like this would be received?"

“I confess,” said I, “I think not very well.”

“I'll admit,” I said, “I don't think it's going very well.”

“But what,” said he, “if I should sort with another kind of ministers, whose chief contrivances and consultations were by what art the prince’s treasures might be increased? where one proposes raising the value of specie when the king’s debts are large, and lowering it when his revenues were to come in, that so he might both pay much with a little, and in a little receive a great deal. Another proposes a pretence of a war, that money might be raised in order to carry it on, and that a peace be concluded as soon as that was done; and this with such appearances of religion as might work on the people, and make them impute it to the piety of their prince, and to his tenderness for the lives of his subjects. A third offers some old musty laws that have been antiquated by a long disuse (and which, as they had been forgotten by all the subjects, so they had also been broken by them), and proposes the levying the penalties of these laws, that, as it would bring in a vast treasure, so there might be a very good pretence for it, since it would look like the executing a law and the doing of justice. A fourth proposes the prohibiting of many things under severe penalties, especially such as were against the interest of the people, and then the dispensing with these prohibitions, upon great compositions, to those who might find their advantage in breaking them. This would serve two ends, both of them acceptable to many; for as those whose avarice led them to transgress would be severely fined, so the selling licences dear would look as if a prince were tender of his people, and would not easily, or at low rates, dispense with anything that might be against the public good. Another proposes that the judges must be made sure, that they may declare always in favour of the prerogative; that they must be often sent for to court, that the king may hear them argue those points in which he is concerned; since, how unjust soever any of his pretensions may be, yet still some one or other of them, either out of contradiction to others, or the pride of singularity, or to make their court, would find out some pretence or other to give the king a fair colour to carry the point. For if the judges but differ in opinion, the clearest thing in the world is made by that means disputable, and truth being once brought in question, the king may then take advantage to expound the law for his own profit; while the judges that stand out will be brought over, either through fear or modesty; and they being thus gained, all of them may be sent to the Bench to give sentence boldly as the king would have it; for fair pretences will never be wanting when sentence is to be given in the prince’s favour. It will either be said that equity lies of his side, or some words in the law will be found sounding that way, or some forced sense will be put on them; and, when all other things fail, the king’s undoubted prerogative will be pretended, as that which is above all law, and to which a religious judge ought to have a special regard. Thus all consent to that maxim of Crassus, that a prince cannot have treasure enough, since he must maintain his armies out of it; that a king, even though he would, can do nothing unjustly; that all property is in him, not excepting the very persons of his subjects; and that no man has any other property but that which the king, out of his goodness, thinks fit to leave him. And they think it is the prince’s interest that there be as little of this left as may be, as if it were his advantage that his people should have neither riches nor liberty, since these things make them less easy and willing to submit to a cruel and unjust government. Whereas necessity and poverty blunts them, makes them patient, beats them down, and breaks that height of spirit that might otherwise dispose them to rebel. Now what if, after all these propositions were made, I should rise up and assert that such counsels were both unbecoming a king and mischievous to him; and that not only his honour, but his safety, consisted more in his people’s wealth than in his own; if I should show that they choose a king for their own sake, and not for his; that, by his care and endeavours, they may be both easy and safe; and that, therefore, a prince ought to take more care of his people’s happiness than of his own, as a shepherd is to take more care of his flock than of himself? It is also certain that they are much mistaken that think the poverty of a nation is a means of the public safety. Who quarrel more than beggars? who does more earnestly long for a change than he that is uneasy in his present circumstances? and who run to create confusions with so desperate a boldness as those who, having nothing to lose, hope to gain by them? If a king should fall under such contempt or envy that he could not keep his subjects in their duty but by oppression and ill usage, and by rendering them poor and miserable, it were certainly better for him to quit his kingdom than to retain it by such methods as make him, while he keeps the name of authority, lose the majesty due to it. Nor is it so becoming the dignity of a king to reign over beggars as over rich and happy subjects. And therefore Fabricius, a man of a noble and exalted temper, said ‘he would rather govern rich men than be rich himself; since for one man to abound in wealth and pleasure when all about him are mourning and groaning, is to be a gaoler and not a king.’ He is an unskilful physician that cannot cure one disease without casting his patient into another. So he that can find no other way for correcting the errors of his people but by taking from them the conveniences of life, shows that he knows not what it is to govern a free nation. He himself ought rather to shake off his sloth, or to lay down his pride, for the contempt or hatred that his people have for him takes its rise from the vices in himself. Let him live upon what belongs to him without wronging others, and accommodate his expense to his revenue. Let him punish crimes, and, by his wise conduct, let him endeavour to prevent them, rather than be severe when he has suffered them to be too common. Let him not rashly revive laws that are abrogated by disuse, especially if they have been long forgotten and never wanted. And let him never take any penalty for the breach of them to which a judge would not give way in a private man, but would look on him as a crafty and unjust person for pretending to it. To these things I would add that law among the Macarians—a people that live not far from Utopia—by which their king, on the day on which he began to reign, is tied by an oath, confirmed by solemn sacrifices, never to have at once above a thousand pounds of gold in his treasures, or so much silver as is equal to that in value. This law, they tell us, was made by an excellent king who had more regard to the riches of his country than to his own wealth, and therefore provided against the heaping up of so much treasure as might impoverish the people. He thought that moderate sum might be sufficient for any accident, if either the king had occasion for it against the rebels, or the kingdom against the invasion of an enemy; but that it was not enough to encourage a prince to invade other men’s rights—a circumstance that was the chief cause of his making that law. He also thought that it was a good provision for that free circulation of money so necessary for the course of commerce and exchange. And when a king must distribute all those extraordinary accessions that increase treasure beyond the due pitch, it makes him less disposed to oppress his subjects. Such a king as this will be the terror of ill men, and will be beloved by all the good.

“But what,” he said, “if I were to team up with a different group of advisors, whose main focus was how to increase the prince’s wealth? One suggests raising the value of money when the king has a lot of debt and lowering it when his income is coming in, allowing him to pay off a lot with just a little, and gain a lot with a little. Another suggests faking a war to raise funds for it, then concluding peace as soon as that's done, all while using religious justifications to sway the people, making them credit their prince with piety and care for their lives. A third proposes reviving old, forgotten laws (which everyone has ignored and broken) and suggests enforcing the penalties for these laws, which would not only bring in a massive amount of money but also sound like justice. A fourth proposes banning many things with harsh penalties, particularly those against the people's interests, and then allowing exemptions for hefty payments from those who would benefit from breaking them. This serves two purposes, both appealing to many; those driven by greed would face heavy fines, while selling exemptions would make it appear as if the prince cares for his people and isn’t easily giving in to anything against the public good. Another advisor suggests ensuring judges always side with the king’s authority; they should be frequently summoned to court so the king can hear them argue points relevant to him. Regardless of how unjust his claims may be, at least one of the judges, motivated by contrary opinions, pride, or wanting to impress the king, would find a way to provide the king with a justification to win the argument. If judges disagree, even the most obvious truth becomes debatable, and once the truth is questioned, the king can then interpret the law for his own gain; judges who resist will likely be swayed by fear or modesty. Once won over, they can all be sent to the Bench to boldly deliver judgments as the king desires; there will always be good reasons when a ruling favors the prince. It will either be claimed that justice is on his side, or they will find some wording in the law to support that view, or impose a strained interpretation. And when all else fails, the king’s absolute authority will be cited, as something above any law, to which a devout judge must pay particular attention. Thus, everyone agrees with Crassus’ saying that a prince can never have too much treasure, as he needs it to maintain his armies; that a king can never act unjustly, even if he wanted to; that all property belongs to him, including the very lives of his subjects; and that no one possesses anything but what the king generously allows them to keep. They believe it is in the prince’s best interest to leave his people as little as possible, as if having wealth or freedom might make them less willing to accept a cruel and unfair government. On the other hand, poverty and necessity make them subdued, compliant, and strip away the spirit that might lead them to revolt. Now, what if, after all these suggestions were presented, I stood up and argued that such advice was unfit for a king and harmful to him; that his honor and safety rely more on the wealth of his people than on his own; that they choose a king for their benefit, not his; that through his care and efforts, they should live comfortably and safely; and that a prince ought to prioritize his people’s happiness over his own needs, much like a shepherd must care for his flock more than for himself? It is also evident that those who think a nation’s poverty ensures public safety are gravely mistaken. Who fights more than the poor? Who desires change more than someone who is unhappy with their situation? And who acts so recklessly to create chaos as those without anything to lose, hoping to gain? If a king loses influence to the extent that he can't keep his subjects loyal except through oppression and making them miserable, he would be better off resigning than maintaining a kingdom by such means, which tarnish the dignity associated with power. It is certainly less honorable for a king to rule over beggars than over thriving and content citizens. This is why Fabricius, a man of noble character, said he would prefer to govern wealthy people than be wealthy himself; for it is unjust for one person to enjoy wealth and comfort while everyone around them is suffering. A poor physician who can’t heal one ailment without inducing another is no better than a king who can’t correct his people’s faults without depriving them of life's essentials—this shows he doesn’t understand how to lead a free nation. He should rather put aside his laziness or arrogance, as the disdain or resentment his people feel comes from his own faults. He should live within his means without harming others, aligning his spending with his income. He should punish crimes and strive to prevent them with wise leadership, rather than being harsh after allowing them to become common. He should avoid arbitrarily reviving outdated laws, especially those long forgotten and unnecessary. And he should never impose penalties for violating those laws if a judge wouldn't do so for an ordinary citizen, as they would view him as deceitful and unjust for trying to enforce them. I would also point to the law among the Macarians—a people near Utopia—where their king, upon taking the throne, swears an oath, confirmed with solemn sacrifices, never to hold more than a thousand pounds of gold or the equivalent amount in silver in his treasury. This law was established by a great king who valued his country’s wealth more than his own and sought to prevent the accumulation of riches that might impoverish the people. He believed that a moderate amount would suffice for emergencies, whether the king needed it against rebels or the kingdom against invaders; but it would not encourage a prince to infringe upon others’ rights—this was the main reason he established that law. He also thought it would ensure a healthy flow of money, essential for commerce and trade. And when a king must distribute extra wealth that exceeds reasonable limits, it makes him less inclined to oppress his subjects. Such a king will instill fear in evildoers and be loved by all the good.”

“If, I say, I should talk of these or such-like things to men that had taken their bias another way, how deaf would they be to all I could say!” “No doubt, very deaf,” answered I; “and no wonder, for one is never to offer propositions or advice that we are certain will not be entertained. Discourses so much out of the road could not avail anything, nor have any effect on men whose minds were prepossessed with different sentiments. This philosophical way of speculation is not unpleasant among friends in a free conversation; but there is no room for it in the courts of princes, where great affairs are carried on by authority.” “That is what I was saying,” replied he, “that there is no room for philosophy in the courts of princes.” “Yes, there is,” said I, “but not for this speculative philosophy, that makes everything to be alike fitting at all times; but there is another philosophy that is more pliable, that knows its proper scene, accommodates itself to it, and teaches a man with propriety and decency to act that part which has fallen to his share. If when one of Plautus’ comedies is upon the stage, and a company of servants are acting their parts, you should come out in the garb of a philosopher, and repeat, out of Octavia, a discourse of Seneca’s to Nero, would it not be better for you to say nothing than by mixing things of such different natures to make an impertinent tragi-comedy? for you spoil and corrupt the play that is in hand when you mix with it things of an opposite nature, even though they are much better. Therefore go through with the play that is acting the best you can, and do not confound it because another that is pleasanter comes into your thoughts. It is even so in a commonwealth and in the councils of princes; if ill opinions cannot be quite rooted out, and you cannot cure some received vice according to your wishes, you must not, therefore, abandon the commonwealth, for the same reasons as you should not forsake the ship in a storm because you cannot command the winds. You are not obliged to assault people with discourses that are out of their road, when you see that their received notions must prevent your making an impression upon them: you ought rather to cast about and to manage things with all the dexterity in your power, so that, if you are not able to make them go well, they may be as little ill as possible; for, except all men were good, everything cannot be right, and that is a blessing that I do not at present hope to see.” “According to your argument,” answered he, “all that I could be able to do would be to preserve myself from being mad while I endeavoured to cure the madness of others; for, if I speak truth, I must repeat what I have said to you; and as for lying, whether a philosopher can do it or not I cannot tell: I am sure I cannot do it. But though these discourses may be uneasy and ungrateful to them, I do not see why they should seem foolish or extravagant; indeed, if I should either propose such things as Plato has contrived in his ‘Commonwealth,’ or as the Utopians practise in theirs, though they might seem better, as certainly they are, yet they are so different from our establishment, which is founded on property (there being no such thing among them), that I could not expect that it would have any effect on them. But such discourses as mine, which only call past evils to mind and give warning of what may follow, leave nothing in them that is so absurd that they may not be used at any time, for they can only be unpleasant to those who are resolved to run headlong the contrary way; and if we must let alone everything as absurd or extravagant—which, by reason of the wicked lives of many, may seem uncouth—we must, even among Christians, give over pressing the greatest part of those things that Christ hath taught us, though He has commanded us not to conceal them, but to proclaim on the housetops that which He taught in secret. The greatest parts of His precepts are more opposite to the lives of the men of this age than any part of my discourse has been, but the preachers seem to have learned that craft to which you advise me: for they, observing that the world would not willingly suit their lives to the rules that Christ has given, have fitted His doctrine, as if it had been a leaden rule, to their lives, that so, some way or other, they might agree with one another. But I see no other effect of this compliance except it be that men become more secure in their wickedness by it; and this is all the success that I can have in a court, for I must always differ from the rest, and then I shall signify nothing; or, if I agree with them, I shall then only help forward their madness. I do not comprehend what you mean by your ‘casting about,’ or by ‘the bending and handling things so dexterously that, if they go not well, they may go as little ill as may be;’ for in courts they will not bear with a man’s holding his peace or conniving at what others do: a man must barefacedly approve of the worst counsels and consent to the blackest designs: so that he would pass for a spy, or, possibly, for a traitor, that did but coldly approve of such wicked practices; and therefore when a man is engaged in such a society, he will be so far from being able to mend matters by his ‘casting about,’ as you call it, that he will find no occasions of doing any good—the ill company will sooner corrupt him than be the better for him; or if, notwithstanding all their ill company, he still remains steady and innocent, yet their follies and knavery will be imputed to him; and, by mixing counsels with them, he must bear his share of all the blame that belongs wholly to others.

“If I were to discuss these or similar topics with people who have a completely different perspective, how deaf would they be to everything I say!” “No doubt, very deaf,” I replied. “And it's no surprise, because you should never present ideas or advice that you know will be ignored. Conversations that stray so far from the norm won’t help or influence people whose minds are already set. This type of philosophical speculation is fine among friends in a casual chat, but there's no place for it in the courts of princes, where significant matters are handled with authority.” “That’s what I was saying,” he replied, “that philosophy has no place in the courts of princes.” “Yes, it does,” I said, “but not this kind of speculative philosophy that claims everything is appropriate at all times. There’s another kind of philosophy that is more adaptable, that understands its context, fits into it, and teaches a person to act appropriately in their assigned role. If during a Plautus comedy, when servants are performing their roles, you were to step out dressed as a philosopher and recite a passage from Seneca’s *Octavia* to Nero, wouldn’t it be better for you to stay silent than to turn the situation into an awkward tragi-comedy by mixing such different elements? You ruin the play at hand when you mix in things that are completely different, even if they are much better. So, do your best with the play that's being performed, and don’t confuse it with thoughts of something more enjoyable. The same goes for a commonwealth and the councils of princes; if bad ideas can’t be completely eliminated and you can't fix certain ingrained vices as you'd like, you shouldn't abandon the commonwealth. Just as you wouldn’t leave a ship in a storm because you can’t control the winds. You’re not expected to bombard people with ideas that are outside their understanding when you know their established beliefs will prevent you from making an impact. Instead, you should try to navigate the situation skillfully so that, if you can't make things go well, they at least don’t go too poorly. Because unless everyone is good, not everything can be right, and that's a blessing I don't expect to see anytime soon.” “According to your argument,” he responded, “it seems all I could do is keep myself sane while trying to help others who are crazy. If I'm being honest, I have to repeat what I've just said to you. As for whether a philosopher can lie, I can't say; I know I can't. But even if these discussions might be uncomfortable or unwelcome for them, I don’t see why they would come off as foolish or outrageous. In fact, if I proposed ideas like those Plato presented in his *Republic* or the practices of the Utopians, while they may seem better—and they certainly are—they are so different from our system, which is based on property (something they lack), that I wouldn’t expect them to have any impact. However, my discussions, which simply reflect on past mistakes and warn of potential future issues, aren’t so absurd that they can’t be used anytime; they will only be unpleasant to those determined to head the other way. If we were to disregard everything as absurd or extravagant—which, due to the wicked lives of many, might seem strange—we would have to, even among Christians, stop advocating the majority of what Christ has taught us, even though He instructed us not to hide these truths but to share them openly. The core of His teachings clashes more with the lifestyles of people today than anything I've said, yet preachers seem to have mastered the art you’re advising me about: noticing that the world wouldn’t easily conform to the rules Christ provided, they have adjusted His doctrine to fit their lives, almost as if it were a flexible standard, so they can find some common ground. But I see no positive outcome from this compromise except that it allows people to become more complacent in their wrongdoing. This is my experience in a court; I will always differ from the crowd and consequently won't matter, or if I go along with them, I will only be complicit in their madness. I don’t understand what you mean by ‘casting about’ or ‘dexterously managing things so that if they don’t go well, they go as little wrong as possible.’ In courts, they're not going to tolerate a person remaining silent or ignoring what others do; one must openly endorse the worst advice and consent to the most despicable schemes. A person would be seen as a spy or perhaps even a traitor for simply giving lukewarm approval to such wicked actions. So, when someone is involved in such a circle, they will be far from able to improve matters by your ‘casting about,’ as you call it; they will find no chances to do good—the bad company will corrupt them much faster than they will improve the group. And even if, despite their terrible company, they remain steadfast and innocent, their foolishness and wrongdoing will still be attributed to them, and by mixing their advice with others, they must share in all the blame that rightfully belongs to someone else.”

“It was no ill simile by which Plato set forth the unreasonableness of a philosopher’s meddling with government. ‘If a man,’ says he, ‘were to see a great company run out every day into the rain and take delight in being wet—if he knew that it would be to no purpose for him to go and persuade them to return to their houses in order to avoid the storm, and that all that could be expected by his going to speak to them would be that he himself should be as wet as they, it would be best for him to keep within doors, and, since he had not influence enough to correct other people’s folly, to take care to preserve himself.’

“It wasn't a bad comparison when Plato highlighted the foolishness of a philosopher getting involved in politics. 'If a man,' he says, 'saw a large group running out into the rain and enjoying getting wet—if he knew it would be pointless to try to convince them to go back inside to avoid the storm, and that all he could expect from speaking to them would be to get just as wet himself, it would be best for him to stay indoors, and since he doesn't have enough influence to change other people's foolishness, to make sure to take care of himself.'”

“Though, to speak plainly my real sentiments, I must freely own that as long as there is any property, and while money is the standard of all other things, I cannot think that a nation can be governed either justly or happily: not justly, because the best things will fall to the share of the worst men; nor happily, because all things will be divided among a few (and even these are not in all respects happy), the rest being left to be absolutely miserable. Therefore, when I reflect on the wise and good constitution of the Utopians, among whom all things are so well governed and with so few laws, where virtue hath its due reward, and yet there is such an equality that every man lives in plenty—when I compare with them so many other nations that are still making new laws, and yet can never bring their constitution to a right regulation; where, notwithstanding every one has his property, yet all the laws that they can invent have not the power either to obtain or preserve it, or even to enable men certainly to distinguish what is their own from what is another’s, of which the many lawsuits that every day break out, and are eternally depending, give too plain a demonstration—when, I say, I balance all these things in my thoughts, I grow more favourable to Plato, and do not wonder that he resolved not to make any laws for such as would not submit to a community of all things; for so wise a man could not but foresee that the setting all upon a level was the only way to make a nation happy; which cannot be obtained so long as there is property, for when every man draws to himself all that he can compass, by one title or another, it must needs follow that, how plentiful soever a nation may be, yet a few dividing the wealth of it among themselves, the rest must fall into indigence. So that there will be two sorts of people among them, who deserve that their fortunes should be interchanged—the former useless, but wicked and ravenous; and the latter, who by their constant industry serve the public more than themselves, sincere and modest men—from whence I am persuaded that till property is taken away, there can be no equitable or just distribution of things, nor can the world be happily governed; for as long as that is maintained, the greatest and the far best part of mankind, will be still oppressed with a load of cares and anxieties. I confess, without taking it quite away, those pressures that lie on a great part of mankind may be made lighter, but they can never be quite removed; for if laws were made to determine at how great an extent in soil, and at how much money, every man must stop—to limit the prince, that he might not grow too great; and to restrain the people, that they might not become too insolent—and that none might factiously aspire to public employments, which ought neither to be sold nor made burdensome by a great expense, since otherwise those that serve in them would be tempted to reimburse themselves by cheats and violence, and it would become necessary to find out rich men for undergoing those employments, which ought rather to be trusted to the wise. These laws, I say, might have such effect as good diet and care might have on a sick man whose recovery is desperate; they might allay and mitigate the disease, but it could never be quite healed, nor the body politic be brought again to a good habit as long as property remains; and it will fall out, as in a complication of diseases, that by applying a remedy to one sore you will provoke another, and that which removes the one ill symptom produces others, while the strengthening one part of the body weakens the rest.” “On the contrary,” answered I, “it seems to me that men cannot live conveniently where all things are common. How can there be any plenty where every man will excuse himself from labour? for as the hope of gain doth not excite him, so the confidence that he has in other men’s industry may make him slothful. If people come to be pinched with want, and yet cannot dispose of anything as their own, what can follow upon this but perpetual sedition and bloodshed, especially when the reverence and authority due to magistrates falls to the ground? for I cannot imagine how that can be kept up among those that are in all things equal to one another.” “I do not wonder,” said he, “that it appears so to you, since you have no notion, or at least no right one, of such a constitution; but if you had been in Utopia with me, and had seen their laws and rules, as I did, for the space of five years, in which I lived among them, and during which time I was so delighted with them that indeed I should never have left them if it had not been to make the discovery of that new world to the Europeans, you would then confess that you had never seen a people so well constituted as they.” “You will not easily persuade me,” said Peter, “that any nation in that new world is better governed than those among us; for as our understandings are not worse than theirs, so our government (if I mistake not) being more ancient, a long practice has helped us to find out many conveniences of life, and some happy chances have discovered other things to us which no man’s understanding could ever have invented.” “As for the antiquity either of their government or of ours,” said he, “you cannot pass a true judgment of it unless you had read their histories; for, if they are to be believed, they had towns among them before these parts were so much as inhabited; and as for those discoveries that have been either hit on by chance or made by ingenious men, these might have happened there as well as here. I do not deny but we are more ingenious than they are, but they exceed us much in industry and application. They knew little concerning us before our arrival among them. They call us all by a general name of ‘The nations that lie beyond the equinoctial line;’ for their chronicle mentions a shipwreck that was made on their coast twelve hundred years ago, and that some Romans and Egyptians that were in the ship, getting safe ashore, spent the rest of their days amongst them; and such was their ingenuity that from this single opportunity they drew the advantage of learning from those unlooked-for guests, and acquired all the useful arts that were then among the Romans, and which were known to these shipwrecked men; and by the hints that they gave them they themselves found out even some of those arts which they could not fully explain, so happily did they improve that accident of having some of our people cast upon their shore. But if such an accident has at any time brought any from thence into Europe, we have been so far from improving it that we do not so much as remember it, as, in aftertimes perhaps, it will be forgot by our people that I was ever there; for though they, from one such accident, made themselves masters of all the good inventions that were among us, yet I believe it would be long before we should learn or put in practice any of the good institutions that are among them. And this is the true cause of their being better governed and living happier than we, though we come not short of them in point of understanding or outward advantages.” Upon this I said to him, “I earnestly beg you would describe that island very particularly to us; be not too short, but set out in order all things relating to their soil, their rivers, their towns, their people, their manners, constitution, laws, and, in a word, all that you imagine we desire to know; and you may well imagine that we desire to know everything concerning them of which we are hitherto ignorant.” “I will do it very willingly,” said he, “for I have digested the whole matter carefully, but it will take up some time.” “Let us go, then,” said I, “first and dine, and then we shall have leisure enough.” He consented; we went in and dined, and after dinner came back and sat down in the same place. I ordered my servants to take care that none might come and interrupt us, and both Peter and I desired Raphael to be as good as his word. When he saw that we were very intent upon it he paused a little to recollect himself, and began in this manner:—

“Honestly, if I’m being straightforward about my true feelings, I have to admit that as long as there’s property and money serves as the measure for everything else, I don’t believe a nation can be governed justly or happily. It’s not justly because the best things will end up with the worst people; and it’s not happily because everything will be divided among a few (and even those few aren’t truly happy), leaving the rest completely miserable. So, when I think about the wise and good system of the Utopians, where everything is so well managed and with so few laws, where virtue is rewarded, and yet there’s such equality that everyone has enough—when I compare them to so many other nations that are constantly making new laws but can never get their systems right; where, despite everyone owning property, the laws they create can't secure it or even help people distinguish what belongs to them versus what belongs to others, evident from the constant lawsuits that emerge every day—I find myself growing more favorable to Plato. I understand why he decided not to make any laws for those who wouldn’t agree to share everything; such a wise man must have realized that leveling everything out was the only way to ensure a nation’s happiness, which can’t happen as long as there is property. When everyone grabs as much as they can in one way or another, it inevitably follows that, no matter how rich a nation may be, a few will hoard the wealth while the rest fall into poverty. Thus, there will be two types of people—those who deserve their fortunes switched: the former are useless but wicked and greedy; the latter are sincere and humble men who, through their constant effort, benefit the public more than themselves. I’m convinced that until property is eliminated, there can’t be a fair or just distribution of resources, nor can the world be governed happily; as long as property exists, the majority of humanity will remain burdened with worries and anxieties. I admit, while we can lessen the pressures on many people without completely removing them, we can never fully eliminate them; for if laws were created to limit how much land and money each person can have— to keep the prince in check from gaining too much power, and to restrain the populace from becoming too arrogant, while preventing anyone from seeking public positions, which shouldn’t be for sale or become a financial burden, since otherwise, those in power would be tempted to exploit others through trickery and violence. It would then become necessary to seek out wealthy individuals for these positions when they should be entrusted to the wise. I say these laws might have the same effect as diet and care on a terminally ill patient; they might ease and alleviate the issues, but they can never be completely healed, nor can the body politic be restored to health as long as property exists. It will inevitably turn out, like managing a range of ailments, that treating one issue may cause another, and remedies for one bad symptom will create others, while strengthening one part of the body weakens the rest.” “On the contrary,” I replied, “I think it’s impossible for people to live well when everything is shared. How can there be plenty if no one feels compelled to work? Since the hope of gain doesn’t motivate them, their reliance on others’ labor might make them lazy. If people suffer from want but can’t own anything, what follows but constant conflict and bloodshed, especially when the respect and authority due to leaders fall apart? I can’t see how that can be maintained when everyone is entirely equal.” “I’m not surprised,” he said, “that you feel this way, since you don’t really understand, or at least don’t have an accurate notion of such a system; but if you had been in Utopia with me, and had seen their laws and regulations as I did during my five years there—and during which time I was so happy with them that I never would have left if it hadn’t been to reveal that new world to the Europeans—you would acknowledge that you’ve never encountered a society so well structured as theirs.” “You won’t easily convince me,” said Peter, “that any nation in that new world is better governed than those we have; for just as our minds are not inferior to theirs, our government (if I’m not mistaken) is older, and centuries of experience have allowed us to discover many conveniences of life, along with a few fortunate discoveries that no one’s intelligence could have invented alone.” “As for the age of either their government or ours,” he replied, “you can’t fairly judge it unless you’ve studied their histories; for if they’re to be believed, they had towns long before these areas were even populated. And regarding those discoveries made by chance or by clever individuals, these could just as easily have occurred there as here. I won’t deny that we might be more inventive than they are, but they greatly outshine us in diligence and focus. They knew very little about us before we arrived. They refer to us collectively as ‘the nations that lie beyond the equinoctial line’ because their records mention a shipwreck on their coast twelve hundred years ago, where some Romans and Egyptians, who reached the shore safely, lived out their remaining days among them. Such was their cleverness that from this single event, they managed to learn from those unexpected guests and acquired all the useful skills known among the Romans, which were taught by these shipwrecked individuals; and through the ideas they shared, they even discovered some skills themselves, so effectively did they make the most of having some of our people wash up on their shores. But if such an event ever brought people here from there, we have long since forgotten it, just as our people might forget that I was ever there. For although they took advantage of one such incident to learn all our best inventions, I believe it would take a long time before we would learn or apply any of the good practices that exist among them. This is the real reason they’re better governed and happier than we, even though we’re not lacking in understanding or external advantages.” At this point, I said to him, “Please, I urge you to describe that island to us in detail; don’t be too brief, but systematically lay out everything regarding their land, rivers, towns, people, culture, structure, laws—in short, everything you think we’d want to know about them of which we currently have no idea.” “I’ll gladly do it,” he said, “since I’ve thought it all through carefully, but it will take some time.” “Let’s go, then,” I said, “first dine, and then we’ll have plenty of time.” He agreed, and we went in for dinner, and after eating, we returned to the same spot. I instructed my servants to ensure we wouldn’t be interrupted, and both Peter and I asked Raphael to keep his promise. Seeing we were very focused, he paused for a moment to gather his thoughts and began this way:—

“The island of Utopia is in the middle two hundred miles broad, and holds almost at the same breadth over a great part of it, but it grows narrower towards both ends. Its figure is not unlike a crescent. Between its horns the sea comes in eleven miles broad, and spreads itself into a great bay, which is environed with land to the compass of about five hundred miles, and is well secured from winds. In this bay there is no great current; the whole coast is, as it were, one continued harbour, which gives all that live in the island great convenience for mutual commerce. But the entry into the bay, occasioned by rocks on the one hand and shallows on the other, is very dangerous. In the middle of it there is one single rock which appears above water, and may, therefore, easily be avoided; and on the top of it there is a tower, in which a garrison is kept; the other rocks lie under water, and are very dangerous. The channel is known only to the natives; so that if any stranger should enter into the bay without one of their pilots he would run great danger of shipwreck. For even they themselves could not pass it safe if some marks that are on the coast did not direct their way; and if these should be but a little shifted, any fleet that might come against them, how great soever it were, would be certainly lost. On the other side of the island there are likewise many harbours; and the coast is so fortified, both by nature and art, that a small number of men can hinder the descent of a great army. But they report (and there remains good marks of it to make it credible) that this was no island at first, but a part of the continent. Utopus, that conquered it (whose name it still carries, for Abraxa was its first name), brought the rude and uncivilised inhabitants into such a good government, and to that measure of politeness, that they now far excel all the rest of mankind. Having soon subdued them, he designed to separate them from the continent, and to bring the sea quite round them. To accomplish this he ordered a deep channel to be dug, fifteen miles long; and that the natives might not think he treated them like slaves, he not only forced the inhabitants, but also his own soldiers, to labour in carrying it on. As he set a vast number of men to work, he, beyond all men’s expectations, brought it to a speedy conclusion. And his neighbours, who at first laughed at the folly of the undertaking, no sooner saw it brought to perfection than they were struck with admiration and terror.

The island of Utopia is about two hundred miles wide in the middle and stays almost that wide for a large part, but it narrows at both ends. Its shape is somewhat like a crescent. Between its tips, the sea comes in eleven miles wide and opens into a large bay, surrounded by land for about five hundred miles, and is well protected from the wind. In this bay, there's no strong current; the whole coastline acts like one continuous harbor, making it easy for everyone living on the island to trade with each other. However, the entrance to the bay is very dangerous due to rocks on one side and shallows on the other. In the center, there is a single rock that shows above the water and can easily be avoided; on top of it, there's a tower with a garrison. The other rocks are submerged and present a serious hazard. Only the locals know the channel, so if any outsider tries to enter the bay without one of their pilots, they risk shipwreck. Even the locals wouldn't be able to get through safely without some markers along the coast to guide them, and if these markers were even slightly changed, any fleet that approached would surely be lost, no matter how large. On the other side of the island, there are also many harbors, and the coast is fortified both naturally and artificially, allowing a small number of defenders to stop a large army from landing. They say (and there are credible signs to back this up) that this wasn't originally an island but part of the mainland. Utopus, who conquered it (and after whom it is named, as it was first called Abraxa), transformed the rough, uncivilized inhabitants into a well-organized society, making them far more cultured than any other group. After quickly subduing them, he aimed to separate them from the mainland and encircle them with water. To do this, he ordered a deep channel, fifteen miles long, to be dug; and to ensure that the locals didn't feel enslaved, he made both the inhabitants and his own soldiers help with the work. By deploying a vast workforce, he unexpectedly completed the project quickly. His neighbors, who initially mocked the idea as foolish, were later filled with admiration and fear when they saw it successfully finished.

“There are fifty-four cities in the island, all large and well built, the manners, customs, and laws of which are the same, and they are all contrived as near in the same manner as the ground on which they stand will allow. The nearest lie at least twenty-four miles’ distance from one another, and the most remote are not so far distant but that a man can go on foot in one day from it to that which lies next it. Every city sends three of their wisest senators once a year to Amaurot, to consult about their common concerns; for that is the chief town of the island, being situated near the centre of it, so that it is the most convenient place for their assemblies. The jurisdiction of every city extends at least twenty miles, and, where the towns lie wider, they have much more ground. No town desires to enlarge its bounds, for the people consider themselves rather as tenants than landlords. They have built, over all the country, farmhouses for husbandmen, which are well contrived, and furnished with all things necessary for country labour. Inhabitants are sent, by turns, from the cities to dwell in them; no country family has fewer than forty men and women in it, besides two slaves. There is a master and a mistress set over every family, and over thirty families there is a magistrate. Every year twenty of this family come back to the town after they have stayed two years in the country, and in their room there are other twenty sent from the town, that they may learn country work from those that have been already one year in the country, as they must teach those that come to them the next from the town. By this means such as dwell in those country farms are never ignorant of agriculture, and so commit no errors which might otherwise be fatal and bring them under a scarcity of corn. But though there is every year such a shifting of the husbandmen to prevent any man being forced against his will to follow that hard course of life too long, yet many among them take such pleasure in it that they desire leave to continue in it many years. These husbandmen till the ground, breed cattle, hew wood, and convey it to the towns either by land or water, as is most convenient. They breed an infinite multitude of chickens in a very curious manner; for the hens do not sit and hatch them, but a vast number of eggs are laid in a gentle and equal heat in order to be hatched, and they are no sooner out of the shell, and able to stir about, but they seem to consider those that feed them as their mothers, and follow them as other chickens do the hen that hatched them. They breed very few horses, but those they have are full of mettle, and are kept only for exercising their youth in the art of sitting and riding them; for they do not put them to any work, either of ploughing or carriage, in which they employ oxen. For though their horses are stronger, yet they find oxen can hold out longer; and as they are not subject to so many diseases, so they are kept upon a less charge and with less trouble. And even when they are so worn out that they are no more fit for labour, they are good meat at last. They sow no corn but that which is to be their bread; for they drink either wine, cider or perry, and often water, sometimes boiled with honey or liquorice, with which they abound; and though they know exactly how much corn will serve every town and all that tract of country which belongs to it, yet they sow much more and breed more cattle than are necessary for their consumption, and they give that overplus of which they make no use to their neighbours. When they want anything in the country which it does not produce, they fetch that from the town, without carrying anything in exchange for it. And the magistrates of the town take care to see it given them; for they meet generally in the town once a month, upon a festival day. When the time of harvest comes, the magistrates in the country send to those in the towns and let them know how many hands they will need for reaping the harvest; and the number they call for being sent to them, they commonly despatch it all in one day.

"There are fifty-four cities on the island, all large and well-constructed, with the same customs, laws, and manners. They're planned similarly according to the land they're built on. The closest cities are at least twenty-four miles apart, and the most distant ones are still close enough that someone can walk to the nearest one in a day. Each city sends three of their wisest senators to Amaurot once a year to discuss shared issues; Amaurot is the main town on the island, located near its center, making it the most convenient location for their meetings. Each city's jurisdiction covers at least twenty miles, and in areas where towns are spaced further apart, they cover much more land. No town wants to expand its borders because the people see themselves as tenants rather than landlords. They’ve built farmhouses across the countryside for farmers; these homes are well-designed and equipped with everything needed for agricultural work. Residents take turns rotating from the cities to live in these homes; each farm family consists of at least forty people, plus two slaves. Each family has a man and a woman overseeing it, and there’s a magistrate for every thirty families. Each year, twenty people from this family return to the town after spending two years in the countryside, while another twenty are sent out to learn agricultural work from those who have been living there for a year, as they need to teach the newcomers coming from the town after them. This system ensures that those living on the farms are well-versed in agriculture, avoiding any mistakes that might lead to a shortage of grain. Although there’s a yearly rotation of farmers to prevent anyone from being forced to endure the tough life too long, many actually enjoy it so much that they request to stay for many years. These farmers cultivate the land, raise livestock, cut wood, and transport it to the towns, either over land or by water, whichever is more convenient. They also raise a large number of chickens in an interesting way; instead of hens sitting on eggs, they put a large batch of eggs in a warm, consistent environment to hatch, and as soon as the chicks emerge from their shells, they think of the people who feed them as their mothers and follow them just like normal chicks follow their hen. They raise very few horses, but those they do have are spirited and are only used for training the youth in riding; they don’t use them for plowing or carrying because they rely on oxen for those tasks. Although horses are stronger, they find that oxen can work longer and aren’t as susceptible to as many illnesses, which makes them cheaper and easier to care for. Even when oxen are worn out and no longer fit for work, they provide good meat. They only grow grain for their bread; they drink wine, cider, perry, and often water, sometimes boiled with honey or licorice, which they have in abundance. Even though they know exactly how much grain each town and its surrounding area needs, they grow much more and raise more livestock than necessary, giving away any surplus they don’t use to their neighbors. If they need something that can’t be produced in the country, they get it from the town without trading anything in return. The town magistrates make sure to provide it, as they generally meet once a month in the town on a festival day. When harvest time comes, the magistrates in the countryside notify those in the towns about how many workers they will need for the harvest; they send the requested number, which is usually completed in just one day."

OF THEIR TOWNS, PARTICULARLY OF AMAUROT

“He that knows one of their towns knows them all—they are so like one another, except where the situation makes some difference. I shall therefore describe one of them, and none is so proper as Amaurot; for as none is more eminent (all the rest yielding in precedence to this, because it is the seat of their supreme council), so there was none of them better known to me, I having lived five years all together in it.

"Anyone who knows one of their towns knows them all—they're all so similar, except where the location makes a difference. So, I'll describe one of them, and Amaurot is the best choice; since none is more prominent (all the others are less important because this is where their supreme council meets), and it's the one I know best since I lived there for five years."

“It lies upon the side of a hill, or, rather, a rising ground. Its figure is almost square, for from the one side of it, which shoots up almost to the top of the hill, it runs down, in a descent for two miles, to the river Anider; but it is a little broader the other way that runs along by the bank of that river. The Anider rises about eighty miles above Amaurot, in a small spring at first. But other brooks falling into it, of which two are more considerable than the rest, as it runs by Amaurot it is grown half a mile broad; but, it still grows larger and larger, till, after sixty miles’ course below it, it is lost in the ocean. Between the town and the sea, and for some miles above the town, it ebbs and flows every six hours with a strong current. The tide comes up about thirty miles so full that there is nothing but salt water in the river, the fresh water being driven back with its force; and above that, for some miles, the water is brackish; but a little higher, as it runs by the town, it is quite fresh; and when the tide ebbs, it continues fresh all along to the sea. There is a bridge cast over the river, not of timber, but of fair stone, consisting of many stately arches; it lies at that part of the town which is farthest from the sea, so that the ships, without any hindrance, lie all along the side of the town. There is, likewise, another river that runs by it, which, though it is not great, yet it runs pleasantly, for it rises out of the same hill on which the town stands, and so runs down through it and falls into the Anider. The inhabitants have fortified the fountain-head of this river, which springs a little without the towns; that so, if they should happen to be besieged, the enemy might not be able to stop or divert the course of the water, nor poison it; from thence it is carried, in earthen pipes, to the lower streets. And for those places of the town to which the water of that small river cannot be conveyed, they have great cisterns for receiving the rain-water, which supplies the want of the other. The town is compassed with a high and thick wall, in which there are many towers and forts; there is also a broad and deep dry ditch, set thick with thorns, cast round three sides of the town, and the river is instead of a ditch on the fourth side. The streets are very convenient for all carriage, and are well sheltered from the winds. Their buildings are good, and are so uniform that a whole side of a street looks like one house. The streets are twenty feet broad; there lie gardens behind all their houses. These are large, but enclosed with buildings, that on all hands face the streets, so that every house has both a door to the street and a back door to the garden. Their doors have all two leaves, which, as they are easily opened, so they shut of their own accord; and, there being no property among them, every man may freely enter into any house whatsoever. At every ten years’ end they shift their houses by lots. They cultivate their gardens with great care, so that they have both vines, fruits, herbs, and flowers in them; and all is so well ordered and so finely kept that I never saw gardens anywhere that were both so fruitful and so beautiful as theirs. And this humour of ordering their gardens so well is not only kept up by the pleasure they find in it, but also by an emulation between the inhabitants of the several streets, who vie with each other. And there is, indeed, nothing belonging to the whole town that is both more useful and more pleasant. So that he who founded the town seems to have taken care of nothing more than of their gardens; for they say the whole scheme of the town was designed at first by Utopus, but he left all that belonged to the ornament and improvement of it to be added by those that should come after him, that being too much for one man to bring to perfection. Their records, that contain the history of their town and State, are preserved with an exact care, and run backwards seventeen hundred and sixty years. From these it appears that their houses were at first low and mean, like cottages, made of any sort of timber, and were built with mud walls and thatched with straw. But now their houses are three storeys high, the fronts of them are faced either with stone, plastering, or brick, and between the facings of their walls they throw in their rubbish. Their roofs are flat, and on them they lay a sort of plaster, which costs very little, and yet is so tempered that it is not apt to take fire, and yet resists the weather more than lead. They have great quantities of glass among them, with which they glaze their windows; they use also in their windows a thin linen cloth, that is so oiled or gummed that it both keeps out the wind and gives free admission to the light.

“It is situated on the slope of a hill, or rather, on rising ground. Its shape is almost square because one side shoots up nearly to the top of the hill and it slopes down for two miles to the river Anider; however, it is slightly wider along the other side that runs by the riverbank. The Anider springs up about eighty miles upstream from Amaurot, beginning as a small spring. However, as other streams flow into it—two of which are more significant than the rest—the river widens to half a mile by the time it reaches Amaurot, and it continues to grow larger until, after flowing for sixty miles below, it empties into the ocean. Between the town and the sea, and for several miles upstream, it flows strongly every six hours. The tide comes up about thirty miles, so full that the river is entirely salt water, pushing back the fresh water. For a few miles above that, the water is brackish; but higher up, as it flows by the town, it is entirely fresh, and when the tide goes out, it remains fresh all the way to the sea. There’s a bridge over the river, not made of wood, but from fine stone, with many impressive arches; it is located on the side of town farthest from the sea, allowing ships to lie along the town’s edge without obstruction. There is also another river that flows nearby, which, although not large, has a pleasant stream as it rises from the same hill on which the town sits and runs through it to join the Anider. The residents have fortified the source of this river, located just outside the town, so that if they are ever besieged, the enemy cannot block or poison the water supply; from there, it flows through earthen pipes to the lower streets. For the areas of the town where the water from that small river cannot reach, they have large cisterns to collect rainwater, which compensates for any shortage. The town is surrounded by a high, thick wall with many towers and forts; there is also a broad, deep dry ditch filled with thorns encircling three sides of the town, while the river serves as a ditch on the fourth. The streets are well-suited for transportation and are well-protected from the wind. Their buildings are good, and so uniform that an entire side of a street looks like one continuous house. The streets are twenty feet wide, with gardens behind all the houses. These gardens are large but surrounded by buildings, facing the streets so that every house has both a door to the street and a back door to the garden. All their doors have two leaves, which open easily but shut automatically; and, since there’s no private property among them, anyone can freely enter any house. Every ten years, they exchange houses by lottery. They take good care of their gardens, which flourish with vines, fruits, herbs, and flowers; everything is so well-organized and maintained that I have never seen gardens anywhere more fruitful and beautiful than theirs. This careful arrangement of their gardens is encouraged not only by the enjoyment they find in it but also by the competition between residents of different streets, as they strive against each other. In fact, there is nothing in the town that is both more useful and more enjoyable. It seems that the founder of the town prioritized the gardens above all else; they say the entire layout of the town was originally designed by Utopus, but he left the details for its enhancement and decoration to those who would come after him, as that was too much for one person to accomplish completely. Their historical records, which document the history of their town and State, are preserved meticulously and date back seventeen hundred and sixty years. From these records, it is clear that their houses were originally low and humble, like cottages, made from various kinds of timber, with mud walls and thatched roofs. Now, however, their houses are three stories tall, with facades made of stone, plaster, or brick, and they fill the spaces between their walls with rubble. Their roofs are flat, and they apply a type of plaster on them, which is very affordable yet fire-resistant and provides better weather protection than lead. They possess large amounts of glass for glazing their windows; they also use a thin linen cloth in their windows, treated with oil or glue, allowing light in while keeping out the wind.”

OF THEIR MAGISTRATES

“Thirty families choose every year a magistrate, who was anciently called the Syphogrant, but is now called the Philarch; and over every ten Syphogrants, with the families subject to them, there is another magistrate, who was anciently called the Tranibore, but of late the Archphilarch. All the Syphogrants, who are in number two hundred, choose the Prince out of a list of four who are named by the people of the four divisions of the city; but they take an oath, before they proceed to an election, that they will choose him whom they think most fit for the office: they give him their voices secretly, so that it is not known for whom every one gives his suffrage. The Prince is for life, unless he is removed upon suspicion of some design to enslave the people. The Tranibors are new chosen every year, but yet they are, for the most part, continued; all their other magistrates are only annual. The Tranibors meet every third day, and oftener if necessary, and consult with the Prince either concerning the affairs of the State in general, or such private differences as may arise sometimes among the people, though that falls out but seldom. There are always two Syphogrants called into the council chamber, and these are changed every day. It is a fundamental rule of their government, that no conclusion can be made in anything that relates to the public till it has been first debated three several days in their council. It is death for any to meet and consult concerning the State, unless it be either in their ordinary council, or in the assembly of the whole body of the people.

“Every year, thirty families select a magistrate, formerly known as the Syphogrant, but now called the Philarch. Over every ten Syphogrants, overseeing the families associated with them, is another magistrate, once referred to as the Tranibore, but lately termed the Archphilarch. There are two hundred Syphogrants who choose the Prince from a list of four nominated by the citizens of the four divisions of the city. Before proceeding with the election, they take an oath to select the person they believe is most suitable for the position; they cast their votes in secret, so it remains unknown who each individual voted for. The Prince serves for life, unless removed due to suspicion of attempting to enslave the people. Tranibors are newly elected each year, but most of them tend to stay on; all other magistrates are elected annually. The Tranibors convene every third day, and more often if needed, to discuss either state affairs or any private disputes that may occasionally arise among the citizens, although that seldom happens. Two Syphogrants are always called into the council chamber, and these are changed daily. A fundamental rule of their government is that no decisions regarding the public can be made unless they have been debated for three separate days in their council. It is punishable by death for anyone to meet and discuss state matters, except in their regular council or in a gathering of the entire populace.”

“These things have been so provided among them that the Prince and the Tranibors may not conspire together to change the government and enslave the people; and therefore when anything of great importance is set on foot, it is sent to the Syphogrants, who, after they have communicated it to the families that belong to their divisions, and have considered it among themselves, make report to the senate; and, upon great occasions, the matter is referred to the council of the whole island. One rule observed in their council is, never to debate a thing on the same day in which it is first proposed; for that is always referred to the next meeting, that so men may not rashly and in the heat of discourse engage themselves too soon, which might bias them so much that, instead of consulting the good of the public, they might rather study to support their first opinions, and by a perverse and preposterous sort of shame hazard their country rather than endanger their own reputation, or venture the being suspected to have wanted foresight in the expedients that they at first proposed; and therefore, to prevent this, they take care that they may rather be deliberate than sudden in their motions.

“These arrangements have been set up so that the Prince and the Tranibors can’t join forces to change the government and oppress the people. As a result, when something significant comes up, it’s sent to the Syphogrants. They discuss it with the families in their divisions and, after considering it among themselves, report back to the senate. For major issues, the matter is referred to the council of the whole island. One rule they follow in their council is to never debate an issue on the same day it is first proposed; instead, it’s always set aside for the next meeting. This way, people avoid rash decisions made in the heat of the moment, which could lead them to prioritize defending their initial opinions over what’s best for the public. They want to prevent a situation where, out of embarrassment or pride, someone would jeopardize their country rather than risk their reputation or be seen as lacking foresight in their initial suggestions. Therefore, they ensure they take time to think things through rather than act impulsively.”

OF THEIR TRADES, AND MANNER OF LIFE

“Agriculture is that which is so universally understood among them that no person, either man or woman, is ignorant of it; they are instructed in it from their childhood, partly by what they learn at school, and partly by practice, they being led out often into the fields about the town, where they not only see others at work but are likewise exercised in it themselves. Besides agriculture, which is so common to them all, every man has some peculiar trade to which he applies himself; such as the manufacture of wool or flax, masonry, smith’s work, or carpenter’s work; for there is no sort of trade that is in great esteem among them. Throughout the island they wear the same sort of clothes, without any other distinction except what is necessary to distinguish the two sexes and the married and unmarried. The fashion never alters, and as it is neither disagreeable nor uneasy, so it is suited to the climate, and calculated both for their summers and winters. Every family makes their own clothes; but all among them, women as well as men, learn one or other of the trades formerly mentioned. Women, for the most part, deal in wool and flax, which suit best with their weakness, leaving the ruder trades to the men. The same trade generally passes down from father to son, inclinations often following descent: but if any man’s genius lies another way he is, by adoption, translated into a family that deals in the trade to which he is inclined; and when that is to be done, care is taken, not only by his father, but by the magistrate, that he may be put to a discreet and good man: and if, after a person has learned one trade, he desires to acquire another, that is also allowed, and is managed in the same manner as the former. When he has learned both, he follows that which he likes best, unless the public has more occasion for the other.

Agriculture is something everyone understands, so no one, whether male or female, is unaware of it. They learn about it from childhood, both in school and through hands-on experience, as they often go out into the fields around the town to watch others work and to get involved themselves. In addition to agriculture, each person has a specific trade they focus on, like wool or flax processing, masonry, blacksmithing, or carpentry, since no particular trade is more prestigious than others. Across the island, everyone wears similar clothing, with the only differences made to distinguish between men and women, as well as the married and unmarried. The style never changes, and since it’s neither uncomfortable nor unattractive, it suits the climate and works for both summer and winter. Each family makes its own clothes; however, both women and men learn at least one of the trades mentioned earlier. Women typically work with wool and flax, which match their strengths, while men take on the heavier trades. Generally, trades are passed down from father to son, with interests often following family lines. However, if someone’s talent lies elsewhere, they can be adopted into a family that practices the trade they prefer, and both the father and the magistrate ensure they are placed with a reputable, sensible person. If someone learns one trade and wants to acquire another, that is also allowed and managed similarly to the first. Once they have learned both, they pursue the one they prefer unless there’s a greater need for the other in the community.

The chief, and almost the only, business of the Syphogrants is to take care that no man may live idle, but that every one may follow his trade diligently; yet they do not wear themselves out with perpetual toil from morning to night, as if they were beasts of burden, which as it is indeed a heavy slavery, so it is everywhere the common course of life amongst all mechanics except the Utopians: but they, dividing the day and night into twenty-four hours, appoint six of these for work, three of which are before dinner and three after; they then sup, and at eight o’clock, counting from noon, go to bed and sleep eight hours: the rest of their time, besides that taken up in work, eating, and sleeping, is left to every man’s discretion; yet they are not to abuse that interval to luxury and idleness, but must employ it in some proper exercise, according to their various inclinations, which is, for the most part, reading. It is ordinary to have public lectures every morning before daybreak, at which none are obliged to appear but those who are marked out for literature; yet a great many, both men and women, of all ranks, go to hear lectures of one sort or other, according to their inclinations: but if others that are not made for contemplation, choose rather to employ themselves at that time in their trades, as many of them do, they are not hindered, but are rather commended, as men that take care to serve their country. After supper they spend an hour in some diversion, in summer in their gardens, and in winter in the halls where they eat, where they entertain each other either with music or discourse. They do not so much as know dice, or any such foolish and mischievous games. They have, however, two sorts of games not unlike our chess; the one is between several numbers, in which one number, as it were, consumes another; the other resembles a battle between the virtues and the vices, in which the enmity in the vices among themselves, and their agreement against virtue, is not unpleasantly represented; together with the special opposition between the particular virtues and vices; as also the methods by which vice either openly assaults or secretly undermines virtue; and virtue, on the other hand, resists it. But the time appointed for labour is to be narrowly examined, otherwise you may imagine that since there are only six hours appointed for work, they may fall under a scarcity of necessary provisions: but it is so far from being true that this time is not sufficient for supplying them with plenty of all things, either necessary or convenient, that it is rather too much; and this you will easily apprehend if you consider how great a part of all other nations is quite idle. First, women generally do little, who are the half of mankind; and if some few women are diligent, their husbands are idle: then consider the great company of idle priests, and of those that are called religious men; add to these all rich men, chiefly those that have estates in land, who are called noblemen and gentlemen, together with their families, made up of idle persons, that are kept more for show than use; add to these all those strong and lusty beggars that go about pretending some disease in excuse for their begging; and upon the whole account you will find that the number of those by whose labours mankind is supplied is much less than you perhaps imagined: then consider how few of those that work are employed in labours that are of real service, for we, who measure all things by money, give rise to many trades that are both vain and superfluous, and serve only to support riot and luxury: for if those who work were employed only in such things as the conveniences of life require, there would be such an abundance of them that the prices of them would so sink that tradesmen could not be maintained by their gains; if all those who labour about useless things were set to more profitable employments, and if all they that languish out their lives in sloth and idleness (every one of whom consumes as much as any two of the men that are at work) were forced to labour, you may easily imagine that a small proportion of time would serve for doing all that is either necessary, profitable, or pleasant to mankind, especially while pleasure is kept within its due bounds: this appears very plainly in Utopia; for there, in a great city, and in all the territory that lies round it, you can scarce find five hundred, either men or women, by their age and strength capable of labour, that are not engaged in it. Even the Syphogrants, though excused by the law, yet do not excuse themselves, but work, that by their examples they may excite the industry of the rest of the people; the like exemption is allowed to those who, being recommended to the people by the priests, are, by the secret suffrages of the Syphogrants, privileged from labour, that they may apply themselves wholly to study; and if any of these fall short of those hopes that they seemed at first to give, they are obliged to return to work; and sometimes a mechanic that so employs his leisure hours as to make a considerable advancement in learning is eased from being a tradesman and ranked among their learned men. Out of these they choose their ambassadors, their priests, their Tranibors, and the Prince himself, anciently called their Barzenes, but is called of late their Ademus.

The main job of the Syphogrants is to ensure that no one lives idly and that everyone works hard at their trade. However, they don’t exhaust themselves with endless labor from morning to night like work animals, which is a tough form of slavery often seen among mechanics everywhere except in Utopia. Instead, they divide the day and night into twenty-four hours, designating six hours for work—three before lunch and three after. After dinner, which they call sup, they go to bed at eight o'clock, counting from noon, and sleep for eight hours. The rest of their time, aside from work, eating, and sleeping, is left to individual choice. However, they cannot waste this time on luxury and idleness; instead, it should be spent on some productive activity according to their interests, which mostly means reading. It’s common to have public lectures every morning before sunrise, but attendance is required only for those chosen for literary pursuits. Still, many men and women from all walks of life attend lectures that interest them. If others, not suited for contemplation, prefer to focus on their trades during that time, as many do, they’re encouraged rather than discouraged, praised for contributing to the community. After supper, they spend an hour enjoying leisure activities—gardening in the summer and socializing in the eating halls during winter, either through music or conversation. They don’t even know games like dice or other mindless, harmful pastimes. However, they do have two types of games that are similar to chess: one involves different numbers where one number effectively consumes another, and the other depicts a battle between virtues and vices, illustrating the inner conflict among vices and their united front against virtue, along with the ways in which vice either openly attacks or secretly undermines virtue, while virtue defends itself. The time set aside for labor is worth examining closely; just because they only have six hours for work doesn’t mean they suffer from a lack of necessary resources. On the contrary, this amount of time is more than enough for them to have all they need and want, even bordering on excess, especially when you consider how many people from other nations are completely idle. For starters, women generally do very little work, representing half of humanity, and even when some women are diligent, their husbands might be lazy. Then there’s the large group of idle priests and those labeled as religious, plus all the wealthy landowners known as nobles and gentry, along with their families, who mostly consist of idle individuals kept around for show rather than practical purpose. Don't forget the robust beggars who roam about pretending to be sick as an excuse for begging. Taken together, you’ll find that the number of people whose labor actually sustains humanity is much smaller than you might think. Consider how few of those who do work are engaged in tasks that are genuinely useful; we often value everything by its monetary worth, which leads to many pointless and excessive trades that only support waste and luxury. If all workers were focused solely on the essential things needed for life, there would be such an abundance that prices would drop to the point where tradesmen couldn't survive on their earnings. If those employed in useless activities were redirected toward more useful jobs, and if all the lazy individuals (each consuming as much as two hardworking people) were made to work, you can easily imagine that a short amount of time would suffice for all that is necessary, beneficial, or enjoyable for humanity, especially if pleasure is kept in moderation. This is quite evident in Utopia; in a large city and surrounding area, you can hardly find five hundred capable men or women who aren’t engaged in work. Even the Syphogrants, who are legally exempted, do not exempt themselves; they work to set an example for the rest of the population. A similar exemption applies to those recommended by the priests, who gain privilege from labor through the secret votes of the Syphogrants, allowing them to focus fully on study. If any of these individuals fail to meet the expectations they initially raised, they are required to return to work. Occasionally, a skilled worker who makes significant progress in learning during their free time may be relieved of their trade and recognized among the learned. From this group, they select their ambassadors, priests, Tranibors, and the Prince himself—historically called Barzenes, but recently referred to as Ademus.

“And thus from the great numbers among them that are neither suffered to be idle nor to be employed in any fruitless labour, you may easily make the estimate how much may be done in those few hours in which they are obliged to labour. But, besides all that has been already said, it is to be considered that the needful arts among them are managed with less labour than anywhere else. The building or the repairing of houses among us employ many hands, because often a thriftless heir suffers a house that his father built to fall into decay, so that his successor must, at a great cost, repair that which he might have kept up with a small charge; it frequently happens that the same house which one person built at a vast expense is neglected by another, who thinks he has a more delicate sense of the beauties of architecture, and he, suffering it to fall to ruin, builds another at no less charge. But among the Utopians all things are so regulated that men very seldom build upon a new piece of ground, and are not only very quick in repairing their houses, but show their foresight in preventing their decay, so that their buildings are preserved very long with but very little labour, and thus the builders, to whom that care belongs, are often without employment, except the hewing of timber and the squaring of stones, that the materials may be in readiness for raising a building very suddenly when there is any occasion for it. As to their clothes, observe how little work is spent in them; while they are at labour they are clothed with leather and skins, cut carelessly about them, which will last seven years, and when they appear in public they put on an upper garment which hides the other; and these are all of one colour, and that is the natural colour of the wool. As they need less woollen cloth than is used anywhere else, so that which they make use of is much less costly; they use linen cloth more, but that is prepared with less labour, and they value cloth only by the whiteness of the linen or the cleanness of the wool, without much regard to the fineness of the thread. While in other places four or five upper garments of woollen cloth of different colours, and as many vests of silk, will scarce serve one man, and while those that are nicer think ten too few, every man there is content with one, which very often serves him two years; nor is there anything that can tempt a man to desire more, for if he had them he would neither be the, warmer nor would he make one jot the better appearance for it. And thus, since they are all employed in some useful labour, and since they content themselves with fewer things, it falls out that there is a great abundance of all things among them; so that it frequently happens that, for want of other work, vast numbers are sent out to mend the highways; but when no public undertaking is to be performed, the hours of working are lessened. The magistrates never engage the people in unnecessary labour, since the chief end of the constitution is to regulate labour by the necessities of the public, and to allow the people as much time as is necessary for the improvement of their minds, in which they think the happiness of life consists.

"And so, considering the large number of people among them who are neither allowed to be idle nor to engage in unproductive work, you can easily estimate how much can be accomplished in those few hours when they are required to work. Moreover, it should be noted that the essential trades among them are carried out with less effort than anywhere else. Building or repairing houses here requires many workers because often a careless heir lets a house built by their father fall into disrepair, meaning the next person has to spend a lot to fix what could have been maintained at a low cost. It often happens that one person invests a fortune into building a house, only for another to neglect it due to an obsession with architectural aesthetics, causing it to deteriorate while they build an equally costly new one. However, in Utopia, everything is organized so that people rarely build on new land, and they are not only quick to repair their houses but also take precautions to prevent their decay. Consequently, their buildings last a long time with very little effort, leaving the builders, who are responsible for that care, often without work aside from cutting timber and squaring stones, ensuring materials are ready to construct a new building quickly when needed. As for their clothing, notice how little effort goes into it; while they work, they wear leather and skins carelessly wrapped around them, which last seven years. When they appear in public, they throw on an outer garment that covers the rest, all in a single color, which is the natural color of the wool. Since they require less woolen fabric than is typical elsewhere, the fabric they do use is much less expensive. They use linen more frequently, but it's produced with less labor, and they value fabric simply based on the whiteness of the linen or cleanliness of the wool, without much concern for the quality of the thread. While in other places a man might struggle with four or five outer garments of different colors, along with several silk vests—some people feel ten is barely enough—here, every man is satisfied with just one, which often lasts him two years; nothing could tempt someone to want more, as having more wouldn't make him warmer or improve his appearance in any significant way. Thus, since everyone is engaged in some useful work and since they are satisfied with fewer things, it leads to an abundance of all necessities among them, so much so that, when there’s no other work, many are sent out to repair the roads; but when there are no public projects to undertake, working hours are reduced. The magistrates never force the people into pointless labor since the primary purpose of their governance is to manage work according to public needs and to give people enough time for self-improvement, which they believe is key to a happy life."

OF THEIR TRAFFIC

“But it is now time to explain to you the mutual intercourse of this people, their commerce, and the rules by which all things are distributed among them.

“But it’s time to explain the interactions of this people, their trade, and the rules that govern how everything is shared among them.

“As their cities are composed of families, so their families are made up of those that are nearly related to one another. Their women, when they grow up, are married out, but all the males, both children and grand-children, live still in the same house, in great obedience to their common parent, unless age has weakened his understanding, and in that case he that is next to him in age comes in his room; but lest any city should become either too great, or by any accident be dispeopled, provision is made that none of their cities may contain above six thousand families, besides those of the country around it. No family may have less than ten and more than sixteen persons in it, but there can be no determined number for the children under age; this rule is easily observed by removing some of the children of a more fruitful couple to any other family that does not abound so much in them. By the same rule they supply cities that do not increase so fast from others that breed faster; and if there is any increase over the whole island, then they draw out a number of their citizens out of the several towns and send them over to the neighbouring continent, where, if they find that the inhabitants have more soil than they can well cultivate, they fix a colony, taking the inhabitants into their society if they are willing to live with them; and where they do that of their own accord, they quickly enter into their method of life and conform to their rules, and this proves a happiness to both nations; for, according to their constitution, such care is taken of the soil that it becomes fruitful enough for both, though it might be otherwise too narrow and barren for any one of them. But if the natives refuse to conform themselves to their laws they drive them out of those bounds which they mark out for themselves, and use force if they resist, for they account it a very just cause of war for a nation to hinder others from possessing a part of that soil of which they make no use, but which is suffered to lie idle and uncultivated, since every man has, by the law of nature, a right to such a waste portion of the earth as is necessary for his subsistence. If an accident has so lessened the number of the inhabitants of any of their towns that it cannot be made up from the other towns of the island without diminishing them too much (which is said to have fallen out but twice since they were first a people, when great numbers were carried off by the plague), the loss is then supplied by recalling as many as are wanted from their colonies, for they will abandon these rather than suffer the towns in the island to sink too low.

“As their cities are made up of families, their families consist of people who are closely related. When their women grow up, they get married and move out, but all the males, including children and grandchildren, still live in the same house, showing great respect to their common parent, unless age has dulled his mind; in that case, the eldest son steps in for him. To prevent any city from becoming too large or from losing its population unexpectedly, a rule is in place that no city can contain more than six thousand families, not including those in the surrounding countryside. Each family must have no fewer than ten and no more than sixteen members, but there’s no set number for children under age. This guideline is easily followed by moving some children from larger families to those that have fewer. Similarly, they provide support to slower-growing cities from those that are expanding rapidly. If the population across the entire island grows too much, they take a number of their citizens from different towns and send them to nearby continents. There, if they find that the people have more land than they can effectively farm, they establish a colony, welcoming the locals into their community if they wish to join. When the locals choose to integrate, they quickly adapt to their way of life and rules, benefiting both groups; their careful land management ensures there’s enough food for everyone, even if it might otherwise be too scarce or unproductive for just one group. However, if the natives refuse to follow their laws, they expel them from the areas they claim for themselves, using force if there’s resistance, as they believe it’s justifiable for one nation to prevent others from occupying land that remains unused and uncultivated, given that every person, by natural law, has a right to a portion of land necessary for survival. If an unforeseen event significantly reduces the inhabitants of any town to the point where it can't be replenished from other towns without harming them too much (which is said to have occurred only twice since they became a people, when many were lost to the plague), they make up the loss by recalling as many as needed from their colonies, as they prioritize keeping their towns in the island from declining too low.”

“But to return to their manner of living in society: the oldest man of every family, as has been already said, is its governor; wives serve their husbands, and children their parents, and always the younger serves the elder. Every city is divided into four equal parts, and in the middle of each there is a market-place. What is brought thither, and manufactured by the several families, is carried from thence to houses appointed for that purpose, in which all things of a sort are laid by themselves; and thither every father goes, and takes whatsoever he or his family stand in need of, without either paying for it or leaving anything in exchange. There is no reason for giving a denial to any person, since there is such plenty of everything among them; and there is no danger of a man’s asking for more than he needs; they have no inducements to do this, since they are sure they shall always be supplied: it is the fear of want that makes any of the whole race of animals either greedy or ravenous; but, besides fear, there is in man a pride that makes him fancy it a particular glory to excel others in pomp and excess; but by the laws of the Utopians, there is no room for this. Near these markets there are others for all sorts of provisions, where there are not only herbs, fruits, and bread, but also fish, fowl, and cattle. There are also, without their towns, places appointed near some running water for killing their beasts and for washing away their filth, which is done by their slaves; for they suffer none of their citizens to kill their cattle, because they think that pity and good-nature, which are among the best of those affections that are born with us, are much impaired by the butchering of animals; nor do they suffer anything that is foul or unclean to be brought within their towns, lest the air should be infected by ill-smells, which might prejudice their health. In every street there are great halls, that lie at an equal distance from each other, distinguished by particular names. The Syphogrants dwell in those that are set over thirty families, fifteen lying on one side of it, and as many on the other. In these halls they all meet and have their repasts; the stewards of every one of them come to the market-place at an appointed hour, and according to the number of those that belong to the hall they carry home provisions. But they take more care of their sick than of any others; these are lodged and provided for in public hospitals. They have belonging to every town four hospitals, that are built without their walls, and are so large that they may pass for little towns; by this means, if they had ever such a number of sick persons, they could lodge them conveniently, and at such a distance that such of them as are sick of infectious diseases may be kept so far from the rest that there can be no danger of contagion. The hospitals are furnished and stored with all things that are convenient for the ease and recovery of the sick; and those that are put in them are looked after with such tender and watchful care, and are so constantly attended by their skilful physicians, that as none is sent to them against their will, so there is scarce one in a whole town that, if he should fall ill, would not choose rather to go thither than lie sick at home.

But to go back to their way of living in society: the oldest man in each family, as mentioned before, is in charge. Wives serve their husbands, children serve their parents, and the younger always serves the elder. Each city is divided into four equal parts, with a marketplace in the center of each. The goods that are brought there and produced by the different families are taken to designated houses where similar items are kept. Every father goes there and takes whatever he or his family needs, without paying for it or leaving anything in exchange. There’s no reason to deny anyone since there’s plenty of everything among them, and there’s no risk of someone asking for more than they need; they have no motivation to do that because they know they'll always have what they need. It's the fear of scarcity that drives any living creature to be greedy or ravenous; but apart from fear, there’s a pride in humans that makes them feel it's a special achievement to outshine others in showiness and excess. However, the laws of the Utopians eliminate that. Near these markets, there are others for all kinds of food, including herbs, fruits, bread, as well as fish, birds, and livestock. There are also designated areas outside their towns, near running water, for slaughtering their animals and washing away waste, which is handled by their slaves; they don’t let any of their citizens kill livestock because they believe that pity and kindness—some of the best feelings we’re born with—are greatly diminished by the killing of animals. They also don’t allow anything dirty or unclean to be brought inside their towns for fear that bad odors might contaminate the air and affect their health. In every street, there are large halls spaced evenly apart, each with a specific name. The Syphogrants live in those that oversee thirty families, with fifteen on each side. In these halls, they all gather for meals; the stewards of each hall go to the marketplace at a set time and bring back supplies based on how many belong to the hall. They take special care of the sick, more than anyone else; these individuals are housed and cared for in public hospitals. Each town has four hospitals located outside their walls, which are so large they could be considered small towns. Because of this, even if they had a large number of sick people, they could accommodate them comfortably and keep those with contagious diseases far enough from others to prevent any risk of spreading illness. The hospitals are equipped with everything necessary for the comfort and recovery of the sick, and those admitted there receive such attentive and watchful care. They're constantly looked after by skilled doctors, so that no one is sent there against their will, and it's rare for anyone in an entire town to prefer to stay sick at home instead of going to the hospital if they fall ill.

“After the steward of the hospitals has taken for the sick whatsoever the physician prescribes, then the best things that are left in the market are distributed equally among the halls in proportion to their numbers; only, in the first place, they serve the Prince, the Chief Priest, the Tranibors, the Ambassadors, and strangers, if there are any, which, indeed, falls out but seldom, and for whom there are houses, well furnished, particularly appointed for their reception when they come among them. At the hours of dinner and supper the whole Syphogranty being called together by sound of trumpet, they meet and eat together, except only such as are in the hospitals or lie sick at home. Yet, after the halls are served, no man is hindered to carry provisions home from the market-place, for they know that none does that but for some good reason; for though any that will may eat at home, yet none does it willingly, since it is both ridiculous and foolish for any to give themselves the trouble to make ready an ill dinner at home when there is a much more plentiful one made ready for him so near hand. All the uneasy and sordid services about these halls are performed by their slaves; but the dressing and cooking their meat, and the ordering their tables, belong only to the women, all those of every family taking it by turns. They sit at three or more tables, according to their number; the men sit towards the wall, and the women sit on the other side, that if any of them should be taken suddenly ill, which is no uncommon case amongst women with child, she may, without disturbing the rest, rise and go to the nurses’ room (who are there with the sucking children), where there is always clean water at hand and cradles, in which they may lay the young children if there is occasion for it, and a fire, that they may shift and dress them before it. Every child is nursed by its own mother if death or sickness does not intervene; and in that case the Syphogrants’ wives find out a nurse quickly, which is no hard matter, for any one that can do it offers herself cheerfully; for as they are much inclined to that piece of mercy, so the child whom they nurse considers the nurse as its mother. All the children under five years old sit among the nurses; the rest of the younger sort of both sexes, till they are fit for marriage, either serve those that sit at table, or, if they are not strong enough for that, stand by them in great silence and eat what is given them; nor have they any other formality of dining. In the middle of the first table, which stands across the upper end of the hall, sit the Syphogrant and his wife, for that is the chief and most conspicuous place; next to him sit two of the most ancient, for there go always four to a mess. If there is a temple within the Syphogranty, the Priest and his wife sit with the Syphogrant above all the rest; next them there is a mixture of old and young, who are so placed that as the young are set near others, so they are mixed with the more ancient; which, they say, was appointed on this account: that the gravity of the old people, and the reverence that is due to them, might restrain the younger from all indecent words and gestures. Dishes are not served up to the whole table at first, but the best are first set before the old, whose seats are distinguished from the young, and, after them, all the rest are served alike. The old men distribute to the younger any curious meats that happen to be set before them, if there is not such an abundance of them that the whole company may be served alike.

“After the hospital steward has taken what the doctor prescribes for the sick, the best items left in the market are distributed evenly among the halls based on their numbers. However, priority is given to the Prince, the Chief Priest, the Tranibors, the Ambassadors, and any visiting strangers, though the latter rarely come. There are special, well-furnished houses designated for their stay when they do. At dinner and supper times, the entire Syphogranty is summoned together by the sound of a trumpet, and they meet to eat together, except for those in the hospitals or who are sick at home. Once the halls have been served, anyone can take food home from the market, as it's understood that they do so for good reasons; although anyone can eat at home, most choose not to because it's both silly and troublesome to prepare a less satisfying meal at home when a more plentiful feast is available nearby. All the unpleasant and menial tasks related to these halls are done by their slaves, while the preparation and cooking of the food and setting the tables are done by women, with all families taking turns. They sit at three or more tables, depending on their numbers; men sit along the wall, and women sit across from them. This setup allows any woman who suddenly falls ill, which happens often among pregnant women, to leave discreetly for the nurses’ room (where nurses are present with the infants), where clean water and cradles are always available for laying down the young children if needed, along with a fire for changing and dressing them. Each child is nursed by its own mother unless death or illness intervenes; in such cases, the Syphogrants’ wives quickly find a nurse, which is usually easy, since anyone who can help is happy to volunteer. They tend to be very inclined to this act of kindness, and the child they nurse regards the nurse as its mother. All children under five years old sit among the nurses, while the younger children of both genders, until they are ready for marriage, either serve those at the table or stand silently nearby eating whatever is given to them; they don’t have any formal dining etiquette. At the middle of the first table, located across the upper end of the hall, the Syphogrant and his wife sit, as that is the most prominent spot. Next to them sit two of the oldest members, since there are always four to a table. If there's a temple within the Syphogranty, the Priest and his wife sit with the Syphogrant above all others; following them, there’s a mix of old and young people placed together so that the young are near others and are interspersed with the elderly. This arrangement is said to help instill the seriousness of the older individuals and the respect due to them, which keeps the younger ones from using inappropriate language or gestures. Dishes aren’t served to the entire table all at once; instead, the best dishes are served first to the elders, whose seats are distinct from the younger guests, and after them, everyone else is served equally. The older men pass any special dishes that appear before them to the younger guests if there aren’t enough to serve the entire group.”

“Thus old men are honoured with a particular respect, yet all the rest fare as well as they. Both dinner and supper are begun with some lecture of morality that is read to them; but it is so short that it is not tedious nor uneasy to them to hear it. From hence the old men take occasion to entertain those about them with some useful and pleasant enlargements; but they do not engross the whole discourse so to themselves during their meals that the younger may not put in for a share; on the contrary, they engage them to talk, that so they may, in that free way of conversation, find out the force of every one’s spirit and observe his temper. They despatch their dinners quickly, but sit long at supper, because they go to work after the one, and are to sleep after the other, during which they think the stomach carries on the concoction more vigorously. They never sup without music, and there is always fruit served up after meat; while they are at table some burn perfumes and sprinkle about fragrant ointments and sweet waters—in short, they want nothing that may cheer up their spirits; they give themselves a large allowance that way, and indulge themselves in all such pleasures as are attended with no inconvenience. Thus do those that are in the towns live together; but in the country, where they live at a great distance, every one eats at home, and no family wants any necessary sort of provision, for it is from them that provisions are sent unto those that live in the towns.

Old men are treated with special respect, but everyone else is treated just as well. Meals start with a short reading of moral lessons, enough to not be boring or uncomfortable to listen to. This gives older men the chance to share useful and enjoyable stories, but they don't dominate the conversation during meals; instead, they encourage younger people to join in, allowing everyone to express themselves and show their personalities. They finish dinner quickly but take their time at supper since they have work to do afterwards and will be going to sleep after that, which they believe helps digestion. They always enjoy music during supper, and fruit is served after the meal. While at the table, some burn perfumes and sprinkle fragrant ointments and sweet waters—essentially, they do everything they can to lift their spirits, indulging in all the pleasures that come without any downsides. This is how people in towns socialize; however, in the countryside, where people live far apart, everyone eats at home, and no household lacks essential supplies because they send provisions to those living in towns.

OF THE TRAVELLING OF THE UTOPIANS

If any man has a mind to visit his friends that live in some other town, or desires to travel and see the rest of the country, he obtains leave very easily from the Syphogrant and Tranibors, when there is no particular occasion for him at home. Such as travel carry with them a passport from the Prince, which both certifies the licence that is granted for travelling, and limits the time of their return. They are furnished with a waggon and a slave, who drives the oxen and looks after them; but, unless there are women in the company, the waggon is sent back at the end of the journey as a needless encumbrance. While they are on the road they carry no provisions with them, yet they want for nothing, but are everywhere treated as if they were at home. If they stay in any place longer than a night, every one follows his proper occupation, and is very well used by those of his own trade; but if any man goes out of the city to which he belongs without leave, and is found rambling without a passport, he is severely treated, he is punished as a fugitive, and sent home disgracefully; and, if he falls again into the like fault, is condemned to slavery. If any man has a mind to travel only over the precinct of his own city, he may freely do it, with his father’s permission and his wife’s consent; but when he comes into any of the country houses, if he expects to be entertained by them, he must labour with them and conform to their rules; and if he does this, he may freely go over the whole precinct, being then as useful to the city to which he belongs as if he were still within it. Thus you see that there are no idle persons among them, nor pretences of excusing any from labour. There are no taverns, no ale-houses, nor stews among them, nor any other occasions of corrupting each other, of getting into corners, or forming themselves into parties; all men live in full view, so that all are obliged both to perform their ordinary task and to employ themselves well in their spare hours; and it is certain that a people thus ordered must live in great abundance of all things, and these being equally distributed among them, no man can want or be obliged to beg.

If someone wants to visit friends in another town or desires to travel and explore the country, it's easy for them to get permission from the Syphogrant and Tranibors when there's no pressing matter at home. Travelers are given a passport from the Prince, which grants them permission to travel and states when they need to return. They're provided with a wagon and a slave who drives the oxen and takes care of them; however, if there are no women along, the wagon is sent back at the end of the trip since it’s seen as unnecessary. While on the road, they don't carry food with them, yet they have everything they need and are treated like they’re at home. If they stay somewhere longer than a night, everyone goes about their usual work and is well-treated by those in their trade. However, if anyone leaves their city without permission and is found wandering without a passport, they are punished for being a fugitive and sent home in disgrace; if they repeat this mistake, they face enslavement. If someone simply wants to travel within their own city limits, they can do so with their father's permission and their wife's consent; but when they visit country houses, if they expect to be hosted, they must work with the residents and follow their rules. If they do this, they can freely navigate the entire area, contributing to their city as if they were still within it. This shows that there are no idle people among them, nor any excuses for avoiding work. There are no taverns, bars, or brothels, nor any other opportunities for corrupt behavior or forming cliques; everyone lives in plain sight, which means they must all do their tasks and use their free time wisely. It’s clear that a society organized this way must enjoy an abundance of resources, and since these resources are equally distributed, no one goes without or feels the need to beg.

“In their great council at Amaurot, to which there are three sent from every town once a year, they examine what towns abound in provisions and what are under any scarcity, that so the one may be furnished from the other; and this is done freely, without any sort of exchange; for, according to their plenty or scarcity, they supply or are supplied from one another, so that indeed the whole island is, as it were, one family. When they have thus taken care of their whole country, and laid up stores for two years (which they do to prevent the ill consequences of an unfavourable season), they order an exportation of the overplus, both of corn, honey, wool, flax, wood, wax, tallow, leather, and cattle, which they send out, commonly in great quantities, to other nations. They order a seventh part of all these goods to be freely given to the poor of the countries to which they send them, and sell the rest at moderate rates; and by this exchange they not only bring back those few things that they need at home (for, indeed, they scarce need anything but iron), but likewise a great deal of gold and silver; and by their driving this trade so long, it is not to be imagined how vast a treasure they have got among them, so that now they do not much care whether they sell off their merchandise for money in hand or upon trust. A great part of their treasure is now in bonds; but in all their contracts no private man stands bound, but the writing runs in the name of the town; and the towns that owe them money raise it from those private hands that owe it to them, lay it up in their public chamber, or enjoy the profit of it till the Utopians call for it; and they choose rather to let the greatest part of it lie in their hands, who make advantage by it, than to call for it themselves; but if they see that any of their other neighbours stand more in need of it, then they call it in and lend it to them. Whenever they are engaged in war, which is the only occasion in which their treasure can be usefully employed, they make use of it themselves; in great extremities or sudden accidents they employ it in hiring foreign troops, whom they more willingly expose to danger than their own people; they give them great pay, knowing well that this will work even on their enemies; that it will engage them either to betray their own side, or, at least, to desert it; and that it is the best means of raising mutual jealousies among them. For this end they have an incredible treasure; but they do not keep it as a treasure, but in such a manner as I am almost afraid to tell, lest you think it so extravagant as to be hardly credible. This I have the more reason to apprehend because, if I had not seen it myself, I could not have been easily persuaded to have believed it upon any man’s report.

In their big council at Amaurot, which sends three representatives from each town every year, they look into which towns have plenty of resources and which ones are running low, so that they can share what they have without any sort of trade involved. Depending on their abundance or lack, they assist one another, making the whole island feel like one big family. Once they’ve taken care of their entire country and stockpiled resources for two years (to avoid the negative effects of a bad season), they organize the export of surplus goods like grain, honey, wool, flax, wood, wax, tallow, leather, and livestock in large quantities to other nations. They set aside one-seventh of all these goods to be freely donated to the poor in the recipient countries, selling the rest at reasonable prices. Through this exchange, they not only bring back a few essentials (since they hardly need anything but iron) but also a significant amount of gold and silver; over time, this trade has amassed them a vast treasure. They aren't too concerned about selling their goods for cash upfront or on credit. Much of their treasure is now in bonds; however, in all their contracts, no individual is held accountable; instead, the agreements are made in the name of the town. Towns that owe them money collect it from those who owe them and either store it safely or profit from it until the Utopians request it. They prefer to leave most of it with those who benefit from it rather than calling for it themselves, but if they see that other neighbors are in greater need, they reclaim and lend it to them. Whenever they enter into war—which is the only situation where their treasure is truly useful—they use it themselves; in critical times or unexpected situations, they spend it to hire foreign troops, whom they prefer to put at risk over their own people. They pay these troops well, knowing this can turn them against their own side or at least persuade them to abandon it, creating distrust among enemies. For this purpose, they possess an incredible amount of treasure, but they manage it in such a way that I almost hesitate to describe it, fearing it might sound too outrageous to be believable. I particularly feel this way because if I hadn't seen it with my own eyes, I wouldn't have readily believed anyone else's account.

“It is certain that all things appear incredible to us in proportion as they differ from known customs; but one who can judge aright will not wonder to find that, since their constitution differs so much from ours, their value of gold and silver should be measured by a very different standard; for since they have no use for money among themselves, but keep it as a provision against events which seldom happen, and between which there are generally long intervening intervals, they value it no farther than it deserves—that is, in proportion to its use. So that it is plain they must prefer iron either to gold or silver, for men can no more live without iron than without fire or water; but Nature has marked out no use for the other metals so essential as not easily to be dispensed with. The folly of men has enhanced the value of gold and silver because of their scarcity; whereas, on the contrary, it is their opinion that Nature, as an indulgent parent, has freely given us all the best things in great abundance, such as water and earth, but has laid up and hid from us the things that are vain and useless.

"It’s clear that everything seems unbelievable to us when it’s different from what we’re used to; however, a wise person won’t be surprised to see that, because their society is so different from ours, their worth of gold and silver is measured by a different standard. They don’t use money among themselves but keep it just in case something rare happens, and since these events are few and far between, they only value it as much as it’s useful. It’s obvious they would prefer iron over gold or silver, since people can’t live without iron any more than they can live without fire or water; Nature hasn’t assigned any vital use for the other metals that can’t be easily overlooked. People’s foolishness has raised the value of gold and silver due to their scarcity; on the other hand, they believe that Nature, as a generous parent, has provided us with all the best things in abundance, like water and land, but has hidden away the things that are useless."

“If these metals were laid up in any tower in the kingdom it would raise a jealousy of the Prince and Senate, and give birth to that foolish mistrust into which the people are apt to fall—a jealousy of their intending to sacrifice the interest of the public to their own private advantage. If they should work it into vessels, or any sort of plate, they fear that the people might grow too fond of it, and so be unwilling to let the plate be run down, if a war made it necessary, to employ it in paying their soldiers. To prevent all these inconveniences they have fallen upon an expedient which, as it agrees with their other policy, so is it very different from ours, and will scarce gain belief among us who value gold so much, and lay it up so carefully. They eat and drink out of vessels of earth or glass, which make an agreeable appearance, though formed of brittle materials; while they make their chamber-pots and close-stools of gold and silver, and that not only in their public halls but in their private houses. Of the same metals they likewise make chains and fetters for their slaves, to some of which, as a badge of infamy, they hang an earring of gold, and make others wear a chain or a coronet of the same metal; and thus they take care by all possible means to render gold and silver of no esteem; and from hence it is that while other nations part with their gold and silver as unwillingly as if one tore out their bowels, those of Utopia would look on their giving in all they possess of those metals (when there were any use for them) but as the parting with a trifle, or as we would esteem the loss of a penny! They find pearls on their coasts, and diamonds and carbuncles on their rocks; they do not look after them, but, if they find them by chance, they polish them, and with them they adorn their children, who are delighted with them, and glory in them during their childhood; but when they grow to years, and see that none but children use such baubles, they of their own accord, without being bid by their parents, lay them aside, and would be as much ashamed to use them afterwards as children among us, when they come to years, are of their puppets and other toys.

“If these metals were stored in any tower in the kingdom, it would stir up jealousy from the Prince and Senate, leading to that silly mistrust people often fall into—a fear that they intend to sacrifice the public’s interest for their own private gain. If they were to create dishes or any kind of metalware, they worry that people might become too attached to it, making them reluctant to part with it during a war when it’s needed to pay soldiers. To avoid all these issues, they’ve come up with a solution that fits their other policies but is very different from ours, and it would hardly be believed by us who value gold so much and hoard it so carefully. They eat and drink from clay or glass vessels, which look nice even though they’re made of fragile materials; meanwhile, they use gold and silver for their chamber pots and toilets, not just in public places but also in their homes. They also make chains and shackles for their slaves from the same metals; for some, as a mark of disgrace, they hang a gold earring, and others wear a chain or crown of the same metal. In this way, they try to make gold and silver worthless. Consequently, while other nations part with their gold and silver as if it were tearing out their intestines, people in Utopia would view giving away all their metals (when there’s a need for them) as giving up a trinket, or like how we would feel about losing a penny! They find pearls along their shores and diamonds and garnets in their mountains; they don’t actively seek them out, but if they happen to find them, they polish them up and use them to adorn their children, who enjoy them and take pride in them during their childhood. But as they grow up and realize that only children use such trinkets, they willingly put them aside without needing their parents’ encouragement, feeling as embarrassed to use them later as children do here when they grow up and abandon their dolls and toys.”

“I never saw a clearer instance of the opposite impressions that different customs make on people than I observed in the ambassadors of the Anemolians, who came to Amaurot when I was there. As they came to treat of affairs of great consequence, the deputies from several towns met together to wait for their coming. The ambassadors of the nations that lie near Utopia, knowing their customs, and that fine clothes are in no esteem among them, that silk is despised, and gold is a badge of infamy, used to come very modestly clothed; but the Anemolians, lying more remote, and having had little commerce with them, understanding that they were coarsely clothed, and all in the same manner, took it for granted that they had none of those fine things among them of which they made no use; and they, being a vainglorious rather than a wise people, resolved to set themselves out with so much pomp that they should look like gods, and strike the eyes of the poor Utopians with their splendour. Thus three ambassadors made their entry with a hundred attendants, all clad in garments of different colours, and the greater part in silk; the ambassadors themselves, who were of the nobility of their country, were in cloth-of-gold, and adorned with massy chains, earrings and rings of gold; their caps were covered with bracelets set full of pearls and other gems—in a word, they were set out with all those things that among the Utopians were either the badges of slavery, the marks of infamy, or the playthings of children. It was not unpleasant to see, on the one side, how they looked big, when they compared their rich habits with the plain clothes of the Utopians, who were come out in great numbers to see them make their entry; and, on the other, to observe how much they were mistaken in the impression which they hoped this pomp would have made on them. It appeared so ridiculous a show to all that had never stirred out of their country, and had not seen the customs of other nations, that though they paid some reverence to those that were the most meanly clad, as if they had been the ambassadors, yet when they saw the ambassadors themselves so full of gold and chains, they looked upon them as slaves, and forbore to treat them with reverence. You might have seen the children who were grown big enough to despise their playthings, and who had thrown away their jewels, call to their mothers, push them gently, and cry out, ‘See that great fool, that wears pearls and gems as if he were yet a child!’ while their mothers very innocently replied, ‘Hold your peace! this, I believe, is one of the ambassadors’ fools.’ Others censured the fashion of their chains, and observed, ‘That they were of no use, for they were too slight to bind their slaves, who could easily break them; and, besides, hung so loose about them that they thought it easy to throw their away, and so get from them.” But after the ambassadors had stayed a day among them, and saw so vast a quantity of gold in their houses (which was as much despised by them as it was esteemed in other nations), and beheld more gold and silver in the chains and fetters of one slave than all their ornaments amounted to, their plumes fell, and they were ashamed of all that glory for which they had formed valued themselves, and accordingly laid it aside—a resolution that they immediately took when, on their engaging in some free discourse with the Utopians, they discovered their sense of such things and their other customs. The Utopians wonder how any man should be so much taken with the glaring doubtful lustre of a jewel or a stone, that can look up to a star or to the sun himself; or how any should value himself because his cloth is made of a finer thread; for, how fine soever that thread may be, it was once no better than the fleece of a sheep, and that sheep, was a sheep still, for all its wearing it. They wonder much to hear that gold, which in itself is so useless a thing, should be everywhere so much esteemed that even man, for whom it was made, and by whom it has its value, should yet be thought of less value than this metal; that a man of lead, who has no more sense than a log of wood, and is as bad as he is foolish, should have many wise and good men to serve him, only because he has a great heap of that metal; and that if it should happen that by some accident or trick of law (which, sometimes produces as great changes as chance itself) all this wealth should pass from the master to the meanest varlet of his whole family, he himself would very soon become one of his servants, as if he were a thing that belonged to his wealth, and so were bound to follow its fortune! But they much more admire and detest the folly of those who, when they see a rich man, though they neither owe him anything, nor are in any sort dependent on his bounty, yet, merely because he is rich, give him little less than divine honours, even though they know him to be so covetous and base-minded that, notwithstanding all his wealth, he will not part with one farthing of it to them as long as he lives!

“I've never seen a clearer example of how different customs affect people's perceptions than what I witnessed with the ambassadors from the Anemolians when they came to Amaurot during my visit. They arrived to discuss important matters, gathering with delegates from various towns awaiting their arrival. The ambassadors from nearby nations, familiar with Utopian customs and understanding that fancy clothing holds no value there—where silk is looked down upon and gold is seen as shameful—would come dressed modestly. In contrast, the Anemolians, who lived farther away and had little interaction with Utopians, assumed that because the Utopians wore simple clothing, they must not possess the fine luxuries they ignored. Being more vain than wise, they decided to dress extravagantly, aiming to appear godlike and dazzle the modest Utopians with their opulence. Thus, three ambassadors entered with a hundred attendants, all in colorful outfits, most of them in silk; the ambassadors, noblemen of their nation, donned cloth-of-gold and were adorned with heavy chains, earrings, and rings of gold. Their caps were decorated with bracelets studded with pearls and other gems—in short, they wore all those things that were seen among Utopians as symbols of slavery, disgrace, or childish playthings. It was amusing to see, on one hand, how grand they felt comparing their rich attire to the plain outfits of the Utopians, who had gathered in large numbers to witness their arrival. On the other hand, it was clear how misguided they were in thinking that their extravagance would impress the Utopians. To those Utopians who had never traveled beyond their borders and had not seen other cultures, the spectacle appeared absurd. While they offered some respect to the modestly dressed Utopians, thinking they might be the true ambassadors, they viewed the extravagant ones as slaves, withholding the reverence they might typically give. Children who had grown past valuing toys discarded their jewels, nudging their mothers and exclaiming, ‘Look at that foolish person wearing pearls and gems as if they were still a child!’ Their mothers would innocently reply, ‘Be quiet! I believe that’s just one of the ambassadors’ fools.’ Others criticized the design of their chains, pointing out, ‘They’re useless, too flimsy to bind any slave who could easily break free; besides, they hang loose enough for anyone to just throw them off and escape.’ However, after the ambassadors spent a day among the Utopians and saw the vast amounts of gold in their homes (which the Utopians despised as much as they revered it), and realized that one slave's chains and fetters held more gold and silver than all their own ornaments combined, their confidence waned, and they felt ashamed of the splendor they had once prided themselves on, deciding to abandon it. This realization came as they engaged in open discussions with the Utopians and learned about their perspective on such things and their customs. The Utopians were baffled by how someone could be so enchanted by the superficial shine of a jewel or a stone, which seems trivial when one can look up at a star or the sun itself, or why anyone would value themselves for their clothes being made of fine thread; because no matter how fine that thread is, it once was no better than sheep's fleece, and the sheep remains just a sheep, despite its wearing it. They were astounded to hear that gold, a thing of no real use, is so highly regarded that even humans, for whom it was created and from whom it derives its value, are deemed of lesser worth than this metal; that a man of lead, lacking sense and flawed as he is, could have many wise and good people serving him simply because he possesses a large quantity of gold; and that if by some twist of fate or legal shift—all of which can lead to drastic changes—this wealth passes from master to the lowest servant in the household, the former master would rapidly find himself reduced to the status of one of his servants, as if he were nothing more than an extension of his wealth, bound to follow its fortunes! But even more, they detest the folly of those who, when encountering a wealthy man, regardless of whether they owe him anything or are dependent on his generosity, still bestow almost divine honors upon him simply due to his riches, even when they know him to be so greedy and petty-minded that he wouldn’t part with a single penny for them as long as he lives!”

“These and such like notions have that people imbibed, partly from their education, being bred in a country whose customs and laws are opposite to all such foolish maxims, and partly from their learning and studies—for though there are but few in any town that are so wholly excused from labour as to give themselves entirely up to their studies (these being only such persons as discover from their childhood an extraordinary capacity and disposition for letters), yet their children and a great part of the nation, both men and women, are taught to spend those hours in which they are not obliged to work in reading; and this they do through the whole progress of life. They have all their learning in their own tongue, which is both a copious and pleasant language, and in which a man can fully express his mind; it runs over a great tract of many countries, but it is not equally pure in all places. They had never so much as heard of the names of any of those philosophers that are so famous in these parts of the world, before we went among them; and yet they had made the same discoveries as the Greeks, both in music, logic, arithmetic, and geometry. But as they are almost in everything equal to the ancient philosophers, so they far exceed our modern logicians for they have never yet fallen upon the barbarous niceties that our youth are forced to learn in those trifling logical schools that are among us. They are so far from minding chimeras and fantastical images made in the mind that none of them could comprehend what we meant when we talked to them of a man in the abstract as common to all men in particular (so that though we spoke of him as a thing that we could point at with our fingers, yet none of them could perceive him) and yet distinct from every one, as if he were some monstrous Colossus or giant; yet, for all this ignorance of these empty notions, they knew astronomy, and were perfectly acquainted with the motions of the heavenly bodies; and have many instruments, well contrived and divided, by which they very accurately compute the course and positions of the sun, moon, and stars. But for the cheat of divining by the stars, by their oppositions or conjunctions, it has not so much as entered into their thoughts. They have a particular sagacity, founded upon much observation, in judging of the weather, by which they know when they may look for rain, wind, or other alterations in the air; but as to the philosophy of these things, the cause of the saltness of the sea, of its ebbing and flowing, and of the original and nature both of the heavens and the earth, they dispute of them partly as our ancient philosophers have done, and partly upon some new hypothesis, in which, as they differ from them, so they do not in all things agree among themselves.

“These and similar ideas have been absorbed by people partly due to their upbringing in a country where the customs and laws contradict these foolish beliefs, and partly from their education and studies—since very few in any town are completely free from work to devote themselves entirely to studying (these are usually individuals who show an extraordinary talent and inclination for academics from a young age). Still, their children and a large part of the population, both men and women, are encouraged to spend their free hours reading, and they continue this throughout their lives. They learn in their own language, which is rich and enjoyable, allowing them to express their thoughts fully. It spans many regions, although its purity varies. They had never even heard of the famous philosophers from these parts of the world until we arrived, yet they had achieved similar discoveries as the Greeks in music, logic, arithmetic, and geometry. While they match the ancient philosophers in many respects, they surpass our modern logicians; they have not yet encountered the complicated subtleties that our youth are forced to learn in trivial logic classes. They are so far removed from chasing fanciful ideas that none of them understood what we meant when we spoke of a man in the abstract, as if he were a common entity among all individuals (even though we described him as something tangible, none could grasp the concept), yet distinct from every individual, as if he were some monstrous giant. Despite their unfamiliarity with these empty ideas, they possessed knowledge of astronomy and were well-versed in the movements of celestial bodies. They have several well-designed instruments that enable them to accurately calculate the paths and positions of the sun, moon, and stars. However, the notion of predicting the future through the stars, based on their alignments or conjunctions, hasn’t even crossed their minds. They have a unique keen insight, grounded in extensive observation, to judge the weather, allowing them to know when to expect rain, wind, or other changes in the atmosphere. When it comes to the philosophy behind phenomena like the salinity of the sea, its tides, as well as the origins and nature of the heavens and the earth, they engage in discussions partly like our ancient philosophers did, and partly based on some new theories, in which they differ from each other and don't always reach a consensus.”

“As to moral philosophy, they have the same disputes among them as we have here. They examine what are properly good, both for the body and the mind; and whether any outward thing can be called truly good, or if that term belong only to the endowments of the soul. They inquire, likewise, into the nature of virtue and pleasure. But their chief dispute is concerning the happiness of a man, and wherein it consists—whether in some one thing or in a great many. They seem, indeed, more inclinable to that opinion that places, if not the whole, yet the chief part, of a man’s happiness in pleasure; and, what may seem more strange, they make use of arguments even from religion, notwithstanding its severity and roughness, for the support of that opinion so indulgent to pleasure; for they never dispute concerning happiness without fetching some arguments from the principles of religion as well as from natural reason, since without the former they reckon that all our inquiries after happiness must be but conjectural and defective.

When it comes to moral philosophy, they have the same arguments among themselves as we do here. They explore what is truly good for both the body and the mind, and whether anything external can be considered genuinely good, or if that term only applies to the qualities of the soul. They also examine the nature of virtue and pleasure. However, their main debate focuses on a person's happiness and what it consists of—whether it's found in one thing or many. They seem to lean more towards the view that, if not everything, at least the main part of a person's happiness lies in pleasure. Surprisingly, they even use arguments from religion, despite its strictness, to support this pleasure-friendly view. They never discuss happiness without referencing principles from religion as well as natural reason, since they believe that without the former, all our searches for happiness would be merely speculative and lacking.

“These are their religious principles:—That the soul of man is immortal, and that God of His goodness has designed that it should be happy; and that He has, therefore, appointed rewards for good and virtuous actions, and punishments for vice, to be distributed after this life. Though these principles of religion are conveyed down among them by tradition, they think that even reason itself determines a man to believe and acknowledge them; and freely confess that if these were taken away, no man would be so insensible as not to seek after pleasure by all possible means, lawful or unlawful, using only this caution—that a lesser pleasure might not stand in the way of a greater, and that no pleasure ought to be pursued that should draw a great deal of pain after it; for they think it the maddest thing in the world to pursue virtue, that is a sour and difficult thing, and not only to renounce the pleasures of life, but willingly to undergo much pain and trouble, if a man has no prospect of a reward. And what reward can there be for one that has passed his whole life, not only without pleasure, but in pain, if there is nothing to be expected after death? Yet they do not place happiness in all sorts of pleasures, but only in those that in themselves are good and honest. There is a party among them who place happiness in bare virtue; others think that our natures are conducted by virtue to happiness, as that which is the chief good of man. They define virtue thus—that it is a living according to Nature, and think that we are made by God for that end; they believe that a man then follows the dictates of Nature when he pursues or avoids things according to the direction of reason. They say that the first dictate of reason is the kindling in us a love and reverence for the Divine Majesty, to whom we owe both all that we have and, all that we can ever hope for. In the next place, reason directs us to keep our minds as free from passion and as cheerful as we can, and that we should consider ourselves as bound by the ties of good-nature and humanity to use our utmost endeavours to help forward the happiness of all other persons; for there never was any man such a morose and severe pursuer of virtue, such an enemy to pleasure, that though he set hard rules for men to undergo, much pain, many watchings, and other rigors, yet did not at the same time advise them to do all they could in order to relieve and ease the miserable, and who did not represent gentleness and good-nature as amiable dispositions. And from thence they infer that if a man ought to advance the welfare and comfort of the rest of mankind (there being no virtue more proper and peculiar to our nature than to ease the miseries of others, to free from trouble and anxiety, in furnishing them with the comforts of life, in which pleasure consists) Nature much more vigorously leads them to do all this for himself. A life of pleasure is either a real evil, and in that case we ought not to assist others in their pursuit of it, but, on the contrary, to keep them from it all we can, as from that which is most hurtful and deadly; or if it is a good thing, so that we not only may but ought to help others to it, why, then, ought not a man to begin with himself? since no man can be more bound to look after the good of another than after his own; for Nature cannot direct us to be good and kind to others, and yet at the same time to be unmerciful and cruel to ourselves. Thus as they define virtue to be living according to Nature, so they imagine that Nature prompts all people on to seek after pleasure as the end of all they do. They also observe that in order to our supporting the pleasures of life, Nature inclines us to enter into society; for there is no man so much raised above the rest of mankind as to be the only favourite of Nature, who, on the contrary, seems to have placed on a level all those that belong to the same species. Upon this they infer that no man ought to seek his own conveniences so eagerly as to prejudice others; and therefore they think that not only all agreements between private persons ought to be observed, but likewise that all those laws ought to be kept which either a good prince has published in due form, or to which a people that is neither oppressed with tyranny nor circumvented by fraud has consented, for distributing those conveniences of life which afford us all our pleasures.

“These are their religious principles: That the soul of man is immortal, and that God, in His goodness, has intended for it to be happy; therefore, He has set rewards for good and virtuous actions, and punishments for vice, to be given out after this life. Although these beliefs are passed down through tradition, they believe that even reason itself leads a person to accept and acknowledge them; and they openly admit that if these beliefs were removed, no one would be so unaware as not to chase after pleasure by any means, lawful or unlawful, taking care that a lesser pleasure doesn’t get in the way of a greater one, and that no pleasure should be sought that leads to significant pain; for they think it’s the craziest thing to pursue virtue, which is difficult and unappealing, and not only to give up life’s pleasures but also to willingly endure great pain and trouble, if there’s no hope of a reward. And what reward could there be for someone who has gone through their entire life, not only without pleasure but in pain, if there’s nothing to look forward to after death? Yet they don’t believe that happiness lies in all types of pleasure, but only in those that are genuinely good and honorable. There are some among them who see happiness as pure virtue; others believe that our nature leads us through virtue to happiness, viewing it as the greatest good for humanity. They define virtue as living in accordance with Nature and think that we are created by God for that purpose; they believe that a person follows Nature’s guidance when they pursue or avoid things based on reason’s direction. They claim that the first command of reason is to ignite a love and respect for the Divine Majesty, to whom we owe everything we have and all we can ever hope for. Next, reason instructs us to keep our minds as free from passion and as cheerful as possible and to view ourselves as obligated by good nature and humanity to do everything we can to promote the happiness of others; for no one has ever been such a serious and harsh pursuer of virtue, such an enemy of pleasure, that although they imposed strict rules causing others to endure great pain, sleepless nights, and other hardships, they didn’t also encourage them to do their best to relieve the suffering of the miserable and didn’t present kindness and good nature as desirable traits. From this, they conclude that if a person should strive to improve the well-being and comfort of others (with no virtue being more essential to our nature than alleviating the misery of others, easing their troubles, and providing them with life’s comforts, where pleasure resides), then Nature certainly leads them to do all this for themselves even more strongly. A life of pleasure is either genuinely harmful, in which case we shouldn’t assist others in their quest for it, but rather strive to prevent them from it as much as possible, as if it were something extremely harmful and deadly; or if it is a good thing, one that we can and should help others achieve, then why shouldn’t a person start with themselves? Since no one is more obligated to look after the welfare of another than they are to look after their own; because Nature cannot direct us to be good and kind to others while simultaneously being unmerciful and cruel to ourselves. Therefore, as they define virtue as living according to Nature, they believe that Nature encourages everyone to seek pleasure as the ultimate goal of all their actions. They also notice that, to support our pleasures in life, Nature inclines us to form societies; for no person is so elevated above others that they would be the only favorite of Nature, which, on the contrary, seems to place all members of the same species on an equal footing. From this, they derive that no person should pursue their own comforts so passionately as to harm others; and thus, they think that not only should all agreements between individuals be honored, but also that all laws created by a good ruler in proper form, or those to which a people, not oppressed by tyranny nor fooled by deceit, has consented, ought to be upheld in distributing the comforts of life that provide us with all our pleasures.”

“They think it is an evidence of true wisdom for a man to pursue his own advantage as far as the laws allow it, they account it piety to prefer the public good to one’s private concerns, but they think it unjust for a man to seek for pleasure by snatching another man’s pleasures from him; and, on the contrary, they think it a sign of a gentle and good soul for a man to dispense with his own advantage for the good of others, and that by this means a good man finds as much pleasure one way as he parts with another; for as he may expect the like from others when he may come to need it, so, if that should fail him, yet the sense of a good action, and the reflections that he makes on the love and gratitude of those whom he has so obliged, gives the mind more pleasure than the body could have found in that from which it had restrained itself. They are also persuaded that God will make up the loss of those small pleasures with a vast and endless joy, of which religion easily convinces a good soul.

“They believe it’s wise for a person to pursue their own benefit as much as the law allows, and they see it as a virtue to prioritize the common good over personal interests. However, they consider it unfair for someone to seek enjoyment by taking away another's pleasures. On the other hand, they view it as a sign of a kind and good character when someone is willing to sacrifice their own benefit for the sake of others. They believe that in doing so, a good person can find just as much joy in what they give up as what they gain; because when they need help, they can expect the same kindness from others. Even if that support isn’t there, the satisfaction of doing a good deed, along with the appreciation and gratitude from those they've helped, brings more happiness to the mind than the pleasures they have given up could provide to the body. They are also convinced that God will compensate for any small losses with great and everlasting joy, which faith readily reassures a good person of.”

“Thus, upon an inquiry into the whole matter, they reckon that all our actions, and even all our virtues, terminate in pleasure, as in our chief end and greatest happiness; and they call every motion or state, either of body or mind, in which Nature teaches us to delight, a pleasure. Thus they cautiously limit pleasure only to those appetites to which Nature leads us; for they say that Nature leads us only to those delights to which reason, as well as sense, carries us, and by which we neither injure any other person nor lose the possession of greater pleasures, and of such as draw no troubles after them. But they look upon those delights which men by a foolish, though common, mistake call pleasure, as if they could change as easily the nature of things as the use of words, as things that greatly obstruct their real happiness, instead of advancing it, because they so entirely possess the minds of those that are once captivated by them with a false notion of pleasure that there is no room left for pleasures of a truer or purer kind.

“Upon examining the whole situation, they believe that all our actions, and even our virtues, end in pleasure, which they see as our main goal and greatest happiness. They define any movement or state, whether physical or mental, that Nature teaches us to enjoy as pleasure. They carefully limit pleasure to those desires that Nature guides us towards, arguing that Nature only leads us to the joys that both reason and our senses direct us to, and that don’t harm anyone else or prevent us from experiencing greater pleasures that come without troubles. However, they view those pleasures that people mistakenly call pleasure, as if they could change the nature of things just by changing the words, as obstacles to true happiness instead of contributors to it, because these misguided pleasures completely occupy the minds of those who are enchanted by them, leaving no space for more genuine or purer forms of pleasure.”

“There are many things that in themselves have nothing that is truly delightful; on the contrary, they have a good deal of bitterness in them; and yet, from our perverse appetites after forbidden objects, are not only ranked among the pleasures, but are made even the greatest designs, of life. Among those who pursue these sophisticated pleasures they reckon such as I mentioned before, who think themselves really the better for having fine clothes; in which they think they are doubly mistaken, both in the opinion they have of their clothes, and in that they have of themselves. For if you consider the use of clothes, why should a fine thread be thought better than a coarse one? And yet these men, as if they had some real advantages beyond others, and did not owe them wholly to their mistakes, look big, seem to fancy themselves to be more valuable, and imagine that a respect is due to them for the sake of a rich garment, to which they would not have pretended if they had been more meanly clothed, and even resent it as an affront if that respect is not paid them. It is also a great folly to be taken with outward marks of respect, which signify nothing; for what true or real pleasure can one man find in another’s standing bare or making legs to him? Will the bending another man’s knees give ease to yours? and will the head’s being bare cure the madness of yours? And yet it is wonderful to see how this false notion of pleasure bewitches many who delight themselves with the fancy of their nobility, and are pleased with this conceit—that they are descended from ancestors who have been held for some successions rich, and who have had great possessions; for this is all that makes nobility at present. Yet they do not think themselves a whit the less noble, though their immediate parents have left none of this wealth to them, or though they themselves have squandered it away. The Utopians have no better opinion of those who are much taken with gems and precious stones, and who account it a degree of happiness next to a divine one if they can purchase one that is very extraordinary, especially if it be of that sort of stones that is then in greatest request, for the same sort is not at all times universally of the same value, nor will men buy it unless it be dismounted and taken out of the gold. The jeweller is then made to give good security, and required solemnly to swear that the stone is true, that, by such an exact caution, a false one might not be bought instead of a true; though, if you were to examine it, your eye could find no difference between the counterfeit and that which is true; so that they are all one to you, as much as if you were blind. Or can it be thought that they who heap up a useless mass of wealth, not for any use that it is to bring them, but merely to please themselves with the contemplation of it, enjoy any true pleasure in it? The delight they find is only a false shadow of joy. Those are no better whose error is somewhat different from the former, and who hide it out of their fear of losing it; for what other name can fit the hiding it in the earth, or, rather, the restoring it to it again, it being thus cut off from being useful either to its owner or to the rest of mankind? And yet the owner, having hid it carefully, is glad, because he thinks he is now sure of it. If it should be stole, the owner, though he might live perhaps ten years after the theft, of which he knew nothing, would find no difference between his having or losing it, for both ways it was equally useless to him.

“There are many things that aren’t truly enjoyable on their own; in fact, they often come with a fair bit of bitterness. Yet, because of our misguided cravings for forbidden things, they are not only seen as pleasures but even become the biggest pursuits in life. Among those seeking these refined pleasures are those I mentioned before, who believe they are better off because they wear nice clothes. They are mistaken in both how they view their clothes and how they view themselves. When we think about the purpose of clothing, why should fine fabric be considered better than plain fabric? Still, these people act as if they have real advantages over others, unaware that these advantages are completely based on their misconceptions. They carry themselves with an air of importance, believing they deserve respect just for wearing fancy garments that they wouldn’t claim if they were dressed modestly, and they even take offense if that respect isn’t shown. It is also foolish to be impressed by outward signs of respect that mean nothing; what true satisfaction can one person find in another bowing or curtsying to them? Will someone bending their knees ease your own troubles? And does a bare head cure your madness? Yet, it's amazing how this false idea of pleasure captivates many who indulge in feelings of superiority, proud of the belief that they are descendants of wealthy ancestors or those who had great fortunes. This is all that counts for aristocracy nowadays. Still, they don’t think any less noble of themselves even if their parents left them none of that wealth or they’ve squandered it all away. Utopians have no better view of those who obsess over gems and precious stones, convinced that acquiring an extraordinary one, especially if it's currently in high demand, is a happiness just short of divine. The value of these stones isn’t constant; people won't buy them unless they are removed from their gold settings. Jewellers are then required to provide good guarantees and solemnly swear that the stone is genuine, taking such precautions to prevent being tricked into buying a fake. Yet, if you examined it closely, you might see no difference between the counterfeit and the real thing, making them indistinguishable to you, as if you were blind. Can we really believe that those who amass useless wealth, not for any practical purpose but merely for the sake of admiring it, experience true pleasure in doing so? Their delight is just a false shadow of joy. Those who hide their wealth out of fear of losing it are no better; what other term fits for burying it in the ground or simply returning it to the earth, making it useless to both themselves and to others? Still, the owner is pleased with their careful hiding, thinking they are now safe. If it were stolen, the owner might live another ten years without knowing, yet they would find no real difference between having it or losing it, as it was equally useless to them either way.”

“Among those foolish pursuers of pleasure they reckon all that delight in hunting, in fowling, or gaming, of whose madness they have only heard, for they have no such things among them. But they have asked us, ‘What sort of pleasure is it that men can find in throwing the dice?’ (for if there were any pleasure in it, they think the doing it so often should give one a surfeit of it); ‘and what pleasure can one find in hearing the barking and howling of dogs, which seem rather odious than pleasant sounds?’ Nor can they comprehend the pleasure of seeing dogs run after a hare, more than of seeing one dog run after another; for if the seeing them run is that which gives the pleasure, you have the same entertainment to the eye on both these occasions, since that is the same in both cases. But if the pleasure lies in seeing the hare killed and torn by the dogs, this ought rather to stir pity, that a weak, harmless, and fearful hare should be devoured by strong, fierce, and cruel dogs. Therefore all this business of hunting is, among the Utopians, turned over to their butchers, and those, as has been already said, are all slaves, and they look on hunting as one of the basest parts of a butcher’s work, for they account it both more profitable and more decent to kill those beasts that are more necessary and useful to mankind, whereas the killing and tearing of so small and miserable an animal can only attract the huntsman with a false show of pleasure, from which he can reap but small advantage. They look on the desire of the bloodshed, even of beasts, as a mark of a mind that is already corrupted with cruelty, or that at least, by too frequent returns of so brutal a pleasure, must degenerate into it.

“Among those foolish seekers of pleasure, they consider anyone who enjoys hunting, fowling, or gaming to be mad, as they have no such activities among them. They have asked us, ‘What kind of pleasure do people find in rolling dice?’ (because if there were any real enjoyment in it, they think doing it so often would make someone sick of it); ‘and what enjoyment can one get from the barking and howling of dogs, which seem more annoying than pleasant?’ They also can't understand the appeal of seeing dogs chase a hare any more than watching one dog chase another; if the pleasure comes from watching them run, then both scenarios offer the same visual entertainment. But if the joy comes from seeing the hare caught and torn apart by the dogs, that should instead invoke pity for a weak, harmless, and scared hare being devoured by strong, fierce, and cruel dogs. Therefore, all this hunting business is left to their butchers, who, as mentioned before, are all slaves, and they regard hunting as one of the more disgraceful tasks of a butcher, believing it more profitable and respectable to kill animals that are more necessary and useful to humans, while tearing apart such a small and pitiful creature seems to them to attract only those who are misled by a false sense of pleasure, from which they gain little benefit. They see the desire for bloodshed, even of animals, as a sign of a mind already tainted by cruelty or one that, through excessive indulging in such brutal pleasure, must inevitably become corrupt.”

“Thus though the rabble of mankind look upon these, and on innumerable other things of the same nature, as pleasures, the Utopians, on the contrary, observing that there is nothing in them truly pleasant, conclude that they are not to be reckoned among pleasures; for though these things may create some tickling in the senses (which seems to be a true notion of pleasure), yet they imagine that this does not arise from the thing itself, but from a depraved custom, which may so vitiate a man’s taste that bitter things may pass for sweet, as women with child think pitch or tallow taste sweeter than honey; but as a man’s sense, when corrupted either by a disease or some ill habit, does not change the nature of other things, so neither can it change the nature of pleasure.

“Even though the masses of people see these and countless other similar things as pleasures, the Utopians believe the opposite. They recognize that there is nothing truly enjoyable about them, so they don’t consider them real pleasures. While these things might cause a fleeting sensation in the senses (which seems like real pleasure), they think this feeling doesn’t come from the things themselves, but from a twisted custom that can distort a person’s taste to the point where bitter things can seem sweet, much like pregnant women who think pitch or tallow taste sweeter than honey. However, just as a person’s sense, when corrupted by illness or bad habits, doesn't change the true nature of other things, it also can’t alter the essence of pleasure.”

“They reckon up several sorts of pleasures, which they call true ones; some belong to the body, and others to the mind. The pleasures of the mind lie in knowledge, and in that delight which the contemplation of truth carries with it; to which they add the joyful reflections on a well-spent life, and the assured hopes of a future happiness. They divide the pleasures of the body into two sorts—the one is that which gives our senses some real delight, and is performed either by recruiting Nature and supplying those parts which feed the internal heat of life by eating and drinking, or when Nature is eased of any surcharge that oppresses it, when we are relieved from sudden pain, or that which arises from satisfying the appetite which Nature has wisely given to lead us to the propagation of the species. There is another kind of pleasure that arises neither from our receiving what the body requires, nor its being relieved when overcharged, and yet, by a secret unseen virtue, affects the senses, raises the passions, and strikes the mind with generous impressions—this is, the pleasure that arises from music. Another kind of bodily pleasure is that which results from an undisturbed and vigorous constitution of body, when life and active spirits seem to actuate every part. This lively health, when entirely free from all mixture of pain, of itself gives an inward pleasure, independent of all external objects of delight; and though this pleasure does not so powerfully affect us, nor act so strongly on the senses as some of the others, yet it may be esteemed as the greatest of all pleasures; and almost all the Utopians reckon it the foundation and basis of all the other joys of life, since this alone makes the state of life easy and desirable, and when this is wanting, a man is really capable of no other pleasure. They look upon freedom from pain, if it does not rise from perfect health, to be a state of stupidity rather than of pleasure. This subject has been very narrowly canvassed among them, and it has been debated whether a firm and entire health could be called a pleasure or not. Some have thought that there was no pleasure but what was ‘excited’ by some sensible motion in the body. But this opinion has been long ago excluded from among them; so that now they almost universally agree that health is the greatest of all bodily pleasures; and that as there is a pain in sickness which is as opposite in its nature to pleasure as sickness itself is to health, so they hold that health is accompanied with pleasure. And if any should say that sickness is not really pain, but that it only carries pain along with it, they look upon that as a fetch of subtlety that does not much alter the matter. It is all one, in their opinion, whether it be said that health is in itself a pleasure, or that it begets a pleasure, as fire gives heat, so it be granted that all those whose health is entire have a true pleasure in the enjoyment of it. And they reason thus:—‘What is the pleasure of eating, but that a man’s health, which had been weakened, does, with the assistance of food, drive away hunger, and so recruiting itself, recovers its former vigour? And being thus refreshed it finds a pleasure in that conflict; and if the conflict is pleasure, the victory must yet breed a greater pleasure, except we fancy that it becomes stupid as soon as it has obtained that which it pursued, and so neither knows nor rejoices in its own welfare.’ If it is said that health cannot be felt, they absolutely deny it; for what man is in health, that does not perceive it when he is awake? Is there any man that is so dull and stupid as not to acknowledge that he feels a delight in health? And what is delight but another name for pleasure?

“They consider several types of pleasures, which they refer to as true ones; some are physical, and others are mental. The pleasures of the mind come from knowledge and the joy that comes from contemplating the truth; they also include the happy reflections on a life well-lived and the confident hopes of future happiness. They categorize physical pleasures into two types—one is the kind that provides real enjoyment to our senses, achieved either by nourishing our bodies and supplying what fuels our internal heat through eating and drinking, or when we relieve any burden that weighs us down, like sudden pain, or that which comes from satisfying the natural urge to reproduce. The other type of pleasure doesn’t stem from fulfilling the body’s needs or relieving overload, yet, through an unseen power, it impacts our senses, stirs our emotions, and leaves a generous impression on our minds—this is the pleasure derived from music. Another form of physical pleasure comes from having a strong, healthy body, where life and energy seem to invigorate every part. This vibrant health, when completely free from pain, provides a pleasure that is independent of any external joys; and although this pleasure may not affect us as powerfully as some others, it is often regarded as the greatest of all, and nearly all the Utopians see it as the foundation of all other joys in life, as it alone makes life easy and desirable. Without it, a person is truly incapable of experiencing any other pleasure. They view being free from pain, unless it comes from perfect health, as more like a state of dullness than pleasure. This topic has been closely examined among them, and there has been debate over whether complete health can be considered a pleasure or not. Some have believed that there is no pleasure except what is ‘stimulated’ by some tangible motion in the body. However, this view has long been dismissed among them, so that now they nearly all agree that health is the greatest of all physical pleasures; and just as there is pain in illness that opposes pleasure as much as sickness opposes health, they also believe health is accompanied by pleasure. If someone argues that sickness isn't truly painful, but only carries pain with it, they think that’s a clever argument that doesn’t change anything. In their view, it’s the same whether we say that health is a pleasure in itself or that it generates pleasure; just like fire produces heat, so it’s accepted that anyone in good health experiences true pleasure in it. They reason: ‘What is the pleasure of eating, except that a person’s health, which may have been weak, drives away hunger with the help of food, and thus restores its former strength? After being revitalized, it finds pleasure in that struggle; and if the struggle brings pleasure, then the victory must bring even greater pleasure, unless we think it becomes dull as soon as it gets what it sought, and then neither recognizes nor enjoys its own well-being.’ If someone claims that health cannot be felt, they completely reject that; for who in good health doesn’t notice it when they’re awake? Is there anyone so dull as to not recognize that they feel a joy in being healthy? And what is joy but another term for pleasure?”

“But, of all pleasures, they esteem those to be most valuable that lie in the mind, the chief of which arise out of true virtue and the witness of a good conscience. They account health the chief pleasure that belongs to the body; for they think that the pleasure of eating and drinking, and all the other delights of sense, are only so far desirable as they give or maintain health; but they are not pleasant in themselves otherwise than as they resist those impressions that our natural infirmities are still making upon us. For as a wise man desires rather to avoid diseases than to take physic, and to be freed from pain rather than to find ease by remedies, so it is more desirable not to need this sort of pleasure than to be obliged to indulge it. If any man imagines that there is a real happiness in these enjoyments, he must then confess that he would be the happiest of all men if he were to lead his life in perpetual hunger, thirst, and itching, and, by consequence, in perpetual eating, drinking, and scratching himself; which any one may easily see would be not only a base, but a miserable, state of a life. These are, indeed, the lowest of pleasures, and the least pure, for we can never relish them but when they are mixed with the contrary pains. The pain of hunger must give us the pleasure of eating, and here the pain out-balances the pleasure. And as the pain is more vehement, so it lasts much longer; for as it begins before the pleasure, so it does not cease but with the pleasure that extinguishes it, and both expire together. They think, therefore, none of those pleasures are to be valued any further than as they are necessary; yet they rejoice in them, and with due gratitude acknowledge the tenderness of the great Author of Nature, who has planted in us appetites, by which those things that are necessary for our preservation are likewise made pleasant to us. For how miserable a thing would life be if those daily diseases of hunger and thirst were to be carried off by such bitter drugs as we must use for those diseases that return seldomer upon us! And thus these pleasant, as well as proper, gifts of Nature maintain the strength and the sprightliness of our bodies.

“But among all pleasures, they consider those of the mind to be the most valuable, especially those that come from true virtue and the assurance of a clear conscience. They believe that health is the primary pleasure of the body; they think that the joys of eating and drinking, along with all other sensory delights, are only desirable as long as they promote or sustain health. These pleasures aren’t enjoyable in themselves, but only as they counteract the effects of our natural weaknesses. Just as a wise person prefers to avoid illness rather than rely on medicine, and seeks to be free from pain rather than find relief through treatments, it’s more desirable to not need these kinds of pleasures than to have to indulge in them. If anyone believes there’s true happiness in these enjoyments, they must admit that they would be the happiest person alive if they lived in constant hunger, thirst, and discomfort, and consequently, in constant eating, drinking, and scratching; which anyone can easily see would be not only degrading but a miserable way to live. These are indeed the lowest pleasures and the least pure, as we can only enjoy them when mixed with opposing pains. The pain of hunger provides the pleasure of eating, and in this case, the pain outweighs the pleasure. The pain is more intense and lasts much longer; it begins before the pleasure and doesn’t end until the pleasure that cancels it out does, making them both end together. Therefore, they believe that none of these pleasures should be valued beyond their necessity; yet they enjoy them and, with genuine gratitude, acknowledge the kindness of the great Creator of Nature, who has instilled in us appetites that make what is necessary for our survival also enjoyable. For how miserable life would be if the daily challenges of hunger and thirst were to be treated with such bitter remedies as those we take for the rarer ailments! Thus, these enjoyable and fitting gifts of Nature help maintain the strength and vitality of our bodies.”

“They also entertain themselves with the other delights let in at their eyes, their ears, and their nostrils as the pleasant relishes and seasoning of life, which Nature seems to have marked out peculiarly for man, since no other sort of animals contemplates the figure and beauty of the universe, nor is delighted with smells any further than as they distinguish meats by them; nor do they apprehend the concords or discords of sound. Yet, in all pleasures whatsoever, they take care that a lesser joy does not hinder a greater, and that pleasure may never breed pain, which they think always follows dishonest pleasures. But they think it madness for a man to wear out the beauty of his face or the force of his natural strength, to corrupt the sprightliness of his body by sloth and laziness, or to waste it by fasting; that it is madness to weaken the strength of his constitution and reject the other delights of life, unless by renouncing his own satisfaction he can either serve the public or promote the happiness of others, for which he expects a greater recompense from God. So that they look on such a course of life as the mark of a mind that is both cruel to itself and ungrateful to the Author of Nature, as if we would not be beholden to Him for His favours, and therefore rejects all His blessings; as one who should afflict himself for the empty shadow of virtue, or for no better end than to render himself capable of bearing those misfortunes which possibly will never happen.

“They also enjoy the other pleasures that come through their eyes, ears, and noses, which add flavor to life and seem specially intended by Nature for humans, since no other animals appreciate the beauty and design of the universe, nor do they enjoy smells beyond identifying food by them; they also don’t perceive harmonies or disharmonies in sound. However, in all kinds of pleasure, they ensure that smaller joys don’t interfere with greater ones, and that pleasure doesn’t lead to pain, which they believe always follows dishonest pleasures. They consider it madness for someone to wear out their appearance or natural strength, to ruin the liveliness of their body through laziness, or to waste it by fasting; it is seen as madness to weaken one’s health and ignore other pleasures of life, unless by giving up personal satisfaction one can serve the public or enhance the happiness of others, for which they expect a greater reward from God. Therefore, they view such a way of life as indicative of a mind that is both cruel to itself and ungrateful to the Creator, as if we refuse to acknowledge Him for His gifts, thereby rejecting all His blessings; it’s like someone who punishes themselves for the mere illusion of virtue, or for no better reason than to prepare for misfortunes that may never occur.”

“This is their notion of virtue and of pleasure: they think that no man’s reason can carry him to a truer idea of them unless some discovery from heaven should inspire him with sublimer notions. I have not now the leisure to examine whether they think right or wrong in this matter; nor do I judge it necessary, for I have only undertaken to give you an account of their constitution, but not to defend all their principles. I am sure that whatever may be said of their notions, there is not in the whole world either a better people or a happier government. Their bodies are vigorous and lively; and though they are but of a middle stature, and have neither the fruitfullest soil nor the purest air in the world; yet they fortify themselves so well, by their temperate course of life, against the unhealthiness of their air, and by their industry they so cultivate their soil, that there is nowhere to be seen a greater increase, both of corn and cattle, nor are there anywhere healthier men and freer from diseases; for one may there see reduced to practice not only all the art that the husbandman employs in manuring and improving an ill soil, but whole woods plucked up by the roots, and in other places new ones planted, where there were none before. Their principal motive for this is the convenience of carriage, that their timber may be either near their towns or growing on the banks of the sea, or of some rivers, so as to be floated to them; for it is a harder work to carry wood at any distance over land than corn. The people are industrious, apt to learn, as well as cheerful and pleasant, and none can endure more labour when it is necessary; but, except in that case, they love their ease. They are unwearied pursuers of knowledge; for when we had given them some hints of the learning and discipline of the Greeks, concerning whom we only instructed them (for we know that there was nothing among the Romans, except their historians and their poets, that they would value much), it was strange to see how eagerly they were set on learning that language: we began to read a little of it to them, rather in compliance with their importunity than out of any hopes of their reaping from it any great advantage: but, after a very short trial, we found they made such progress, that we saw our labour was like to be more successful than we could have expected: they learned to write their characters and to pronounce their language so exactly, had so quick an apprehension, they remembered it so faithfully, and became so ready and correct in the use of it, that it would have looked like a miracle if the greater part of those whom we taught had not been men both of extraordinary capacity and of a fit age for instruction: they were, for the greatest part, chosen from among their learned men by their chief council, though some studied it of their own accord. In three years’ time they became masters of the whole language, so that they read the best of the Greek authors very exactly. I am, indeed, apt to think that they learned that language the more easily from its having some relation to their own. I believe that they were a colony of the Greeks; for though their language comes nearer the Persian, yet they retain many names, both for their towns and magistrates, that are of Greek derivation. I happened to carry a great many books with me, instead of merchandise, when I sailed my fourth voyage; for I was so far from thinking of soon coming back, that I rather thought never to have returned at all, and I gave them all my books, among which were many of Plato’s and some of Aristotle’s works: I had also Theophrastus on Plants, which, to my great regret, was imperfect; for having laid it carelessly by, while we were at sea, a monkey had seized upon it, and in many places torn out the leaves. They have no books of grammar but Lascares, for I did not carry Theodorus with me; nor have they any dictionaries but Hesichius and Dioscerides. They esteem Plutarch highly, and were much taken with Lucian’s wit and with his pleasant way of writing. As for the poets, they have Aristophanes, Homer, Euripides, and Sophocles of Aldus’s edition; and for historians, Thucydides, Herodotus, and Herodian. One of my companions, Thricius Apinatus, happened to carry with him some of Hippocrates’s works and Galen’s Microtechne, which they hold in great estimation; for though there is no nation in the world that needs physic so little as they do, yet there is not any that honours it so much; they reckon the knowledge of it one of the pleasantest and most profitable parts of philosophy, by which, as they search into the secrets of nature, so they not only find this study highly agreeable, but think that such inquiries are very acceptable to the Author of nature; and imagine, that as He, like the inventors of curious engines amongst mankind, has exposed this great machine of the universe to the view of the only creatures capable of contemplating it, so an exact and curious observer, who admires His workmanship, is much more acceptable to Him than one of the herd, who, like a beast incapable of reason, looks on this glorious scene with the eyes of a dull and unconcerned spectator.

“This is their idea of virtue and pleasure: they believe that no one can truly understand these concepts unless some divine insight inspires them with higher thoughts. I don’t have the time right now to explore whether they’re right or wrong about this; nor do I think it’s necessary, since my purpose is to describe their system, not to defend their beliefs. I am certain that no other people in the world are better or have a happier government. Their bodies are strong and lively; and although they are of average height and don’t have the most fertile land or the cleanest air, they manage to stay healthy by living a balanced lifestyle and working hard on their land. As a result, they experience greater yields of both crops and livestock than anywhere else, and their population is among the healthiest and least prone to illness. You can see them applying not only agricultural techniques for improving poor soil but also uprooting entire forests and planting new ones where there were none before. Their main reason for this is to make transportation easier, so their timber is either close to their towns or near the sea or rivers for easier floating; carrying wood over land is much harder than transporting grain. The people are hardworking, eager to learn, cheerful, and pleasant, and they can handle a lot of work when necessary; but outside of that, they enjoy their leisure time. They are relentless in their pursuit of knowledge; when we introduced them to some Greek learning and education, they were eager to learn that language. We started teaching them a bit, not because we expected much benefit from it, but more to satisfy their requests. However, after a short time, we were surprised by how quickly they picked it up – they learned to write and pronounce the language so accurately and remembered it so well that it would have seemed miraculous if most of those we taught weren’t extraordinary individuals who were also at the right age for learning. They were mostly chosen from among their educated men by their main council, though some studied voluntarily. In three years, they mastered the entire language and could read major Greek authors quite precisely. I tend to think they found it easier to learn because it shares some similarities with their own language. I believe they are descended from the Greeks; although their language is closer to Persian, they still maintain many names for their towns and government officials that have Greek origins. On my fourth voyage, I brought along many books as cargo instead of merchandise, thinking I might never return. I gave them all my books, including many works by Plato and some by Aristotle. I also had Theophrastus on Plants, which I regret was incomplete; a monkey had damaged it while we were at sea. They don’t have grammar books other than Lascares since I didn’t bring Theodorus with me, and their only dictionaries are Hesichius and Dioscorides. They hold Plutarch in high regard and appreciate Lucian’s humor and writing style. As for poets, they have Aldus’s editions of Aristophanes, Homer, Euripides, and Sophocles, and for historians, Thucydides, Herodotus, and Herodian. One of my friends, Thricius Apinatus, happened to bring some works of Hippocrates and Galen’s Microtechne, which they greatly value; although they require medical care less than any other nation, they highly respect it. They consider medical knowledge one of the most enjoyable and useful parts of philosophy, believing that as they explore the mysteries of nature, this pursuit not only brings them joy but is also pleasing to the Creator. They think that just as the Creator, like the inventors of intricate machines among humans, has revealed the vast universe to beings capable of understanding it, a keen observer who appreciates His craftsmanship is far more pleasing to Him than someone of the masses who gazes upon this magnificent scene like an unthinking spectator.”

“The minds of the Utopians, when fenced with a love for learning, are very ingenious in discovering all such arts as are necessary to carry it to perfection. Two things they owe to us, the manufacture of paper and the art of printing; yet they are not so entirely indebted to us for these discoveries but that a great part of the invention was their own. We showed them some books printed by Aldus, we explained to them the way of making paper and the mystery of printing; but, as we had never practised these arts, we described them in a crude and superficial manner. They seized the hints we gave them; and though at first they could not arrive at perfection, yet by making many essays they at last found out and corrected all their errors and conquered every difficulty. Before this they only wrote on parchment, on reeds, or on the barks of trees; but now they have established the manufactures of paper and set up printing presses, so that, if they had but a good number of Greek authors, they would be quickly supplied with many copies of them: at present, though they have no more than those I have mentioned, yet, by several impressions, they have multiplied them into many thousands. If any man was to go among them that had some extraordinary talent, or that by much travelling had observed the customs of many nations (which made us to be so well received), he would receive a hearty welcome, for they are very desirous to know the state of the whole world. Very few go among them on the account of traffic; for what can a man carry to them but iron, or gold, or silver? which merchants desire rather to export than import to a strange country: and as for their exportation, they think it better to manage that themselves than to leave it to foreigners, for by this means, as they understand the state of the neighbouring countries better, so they keep up the art of navigation which cannot be maintained but by much practice.

"The Utopians, motivated by a love for learning, are really clever at finding all the skills needed to perfect it. They owe us two things: the making of paper and the art of printing. However, they're not entirely indebted to us for these inventions, as a significant part of the innovation was their own. We showed them some books printed by Aldus and explained how to make paper and the printing process, but since we never practiced these skills ourselves, our explanations were a bit rough and simple. They took our suggestions and, although they initially struggled to get it right, they eventually learned and improved through many attempts, overcoming every challenge. Before this, they only wrote on parchment, reeds, or tree bark, but now they've created paper manufacturing and set up printing presses. If they had more Greek authors, they'd quickly produce many copies, but for now, they only have a few I've mentioned, which they've printed into the thousands. If someone visits them with unique talents or someone who has traveled and seen the customs of various nations (which is why we were welcomed so warmly), they would receive a heartfelt greeting, as they're very eager to learn about the world. Very few people come to trade with them, as what could one bring but iron, gold, or silver? Those are things merchants prefer to export rather than import into a foreign land. As for their own exports, they prefer to handle that themselves rather than leave it to outsiders, since this way they better understand the conditions of nearby countries and maintain their navigation skills, which can only be upheld through practice."

OF THEIR SLAVES, AND OF THEIR MARRIAGES

“They do not make slaves of prisoners of war, except those that are taken in battle, nor of the sons of their slaves, nor of those of other nations: the slaves among them are only such as are condemned to that state of life for the commission of some crime, or, which is more common, such as their merchants find condemned to die in those parts to which they trade, whom they sometimes redeem at low rates, and in other places have them for nothing. They are kept at perpetual labour, and are always chained, but with this difference, that their own natives are treated much worse than others: they are considered as more profligate than the rest, and since they could not be restrained by the advantages of so excellent an education, are judged worthy of harder usage. Another sort of slaves are the poor of the neighbouring countries, who offer of their own accord to come and serve them: they treat these better, and use them in all other respects as well as their own countrymen, except their imposing more labour upon them, which is no hard task to those that have been accustomed to it; and if any of these have a mind to go back to their own country, which, indeed, falls out but seldom, as they do not force them to stay, so they do not send them away empty-handed.

They don't enslave prisoners of war except for those captured in battle, nor do they enslave the children of their slaves or those from other nations. The slaves among them are only those condemned to this life for committing a crime, or, more commonly, those whom their merchants find condemned to die in the places where they trade, and sometimes they redeem them for low prices or even get them for free. They are subjected to constant labor and are always chained, but the treatment differs: their own people are treated far worse than outsiders. They are seen as more corrupt than others, and because they couldn’t be restrained by the benefits of their excellent education, they are deemed deserving of harsher treatment. Another group of slaves includes the poor from neighboring countries who voluntarily come to serve them. They treat these individuals better and use them similarly to their own countrymen, except they impose more labor on them, which isn't a difficult task for those accustomed to it. If any of these people want to return to their own country, which is rare, they don't force them to stay, and they make sure they don’t leave empty-handed.

“I have already told you with what care they look after their sick, so that nothing is left undone that can contribute either to their ease or health; and for those who are taken with fixed and incurable diseases, they use all possible ways to cherish them and to make their lives as comfortable as possible. They visit them often and take great pains to make their time pass off easily; but when any is taken with a torturing and lingering pain, so that there is no hope either of recovery or ease, the priests and magistrates come and exhort them, that, since they are now unable to go on with the business of life, are become a burden to themselves and to all about them, and they have really out-lived themselves, they should no longer nourish such a rooted distemper, but choose rather to die since they cannot live but in much misery; being assured that if they thus deliver themselves from torture, or are willing that others should do it, they shall be happy after death: since, by their acting thus, they lose none of the pleasures, but only the troubles of life, they think they behave not only reasonably but in a manner consistent with religion and piety; because they follow the advice given them by their priests, who are the expounders of the will of God. Such as are wrought on by these persuasions either starve themselves of their own accord, or take opium, and by that means die without pain. But no man is forced on this way of ending his life; and if they cannot be persuaded to it, this does not induce them to fail in their attendance and care of them: but as they believe that a voluntary death, when it is chosen upon such an authority, is very honourable, so if any man takes away his own life without the approbation of the priests and the senate, they give him none of the honours of a decent funeral, but throw his body into a ditch.

“I've already explained how carefully they care for their sick, ensuring that nothing is overlooked that could help in their comfort or health. For those with chronic and incurable illnesses, they do everything possible to support them and make their lives as comfortable as they can. They visit them frequently and work hard to help them have a peaceful time; however, when someone is suffering from excruciating and persistent pain, with no hope for recovery or relief, the priests and magistrates come to encourage them. They remind the patients that, since they can no longer engage in life's activities and are becoming a burden to themselves and everyone around them, they have truly outlived their time. Therefore, they should not prolong such a deep illness but instead choose to die since they can only live in pain. They are assured that by freeing themselves from suffering, or allowing others to help them, they will find happiness after death: by doing this, they feel they lose only the troubles of life, not its pleasures. They believe they act not only reasonably but also in a way that aligns with religion and piety, as they follow the guidance provided by their priests, who interpret the will of God. Those influenced by these arguments either starve themselves willingly or take opium, dying painlessly as a result. However, no one is forced to end their life in this way, and if they cannot be convinced, the care and attention they receive do not wane. While they regard a voluntary death, chosen with such authority, as very honorable, if someone takes their own life without the approval of the priests and the senate, they are denied a proper funeral and their body is discarded in a ditch.”

“Their women are not married before eighteen nor their men before two-and-twenty, and if any of them run into forbidden embraces before marriage they are severely punished, and the privilege of marriage is denied them unless they can obtain a special warrant from the Prince. Such disorders cast a great reproach upon the master and mistress of the family in which they happen, for it is supposed that they have failed in their duty. The reason of punishing this so severely is, because they think that if they were not strictly restrained from all vagrant appetites, very few would engage in a state in which they venture the quiet of their whole lives, by being confined to one person, and are obliged to endure all the inconveniences with which it is accompanied. In choosing their wives they use a method that would appear to us very absurd and ridiculous, but it is constantly observed among them, and is accounted perfectly consistent with wisdom. Before marriage some grave matron presents the bride, naked, whether she is a virgin or a widow, to the bridegroom, and after that some grave man presents the bridegroom, naked, to the bride. We, indeed, both laughed at this, and condemned it as very indecent. But they, on the other hand, wondered at the folly of the men of all other nations, who, if they are but to buy a horse of a small value, are so cautious that they will see every part of him, and take off both his saddle and all his other tackle, that there may be no secret ulcer hid under any of them, and that yet in the choice of a wife, on which depends the happiness or unhappiness of the rest of his life, a man should venture upon trust, and only see about a handsbreadth of the face, all the rest of the body being covered, under which may lie hid what may be contagious as well as loathsome. All men are not so wise as to choose a woman only for her good qualities, and even wise men consider the body as that which adds not a little to the mind, and it is certain there may be some such deformity covered with clothes as may totally alienate a man from his wife, when it is too late to part with her; if such a thing is discovered after marriage a man has no remedy but patience; they, therefore, think it is reasonable that there should be good provision made against such mischievous frauds.

“Their women don’t get married before they turn eighteen, and men wait until they’re at least twenty-two. If anyone engages in forbidden relationships before marriage, they face severe punishment, and the chance to marry is taken away unless they get a special permit from the Prince. Such issues reflect poorly on the heads of the family where they occur, as it suggests they have failed in their responsibilities. The reason for these harsh punishments is that they believe if people weren't strictly restricted from all temptations, very few would choose to enter a commitment that risks their entire life’s peace by being tied to one person while having to endure all the challenges that come with it. When selecting their wives, they follow a practice that seems quite absurd and ridiculous to us, but they see it as completely wise. Before marriage, a serious woman presents the bride, naked, whether she is a virgin or a widow, to the groom, and then a serious man presents the groom, naked, to the bride. We laughed at this and deemed it very indecent. However, they, in turn, were astonished at the foolishness of men from other cultures who, even when buying a cheap horse, are so cautious that they inspect every part and remove the saddle and other gear to check for any hidden issues, yet when it comes to choosing a wife—whose qualities will determine the happiness or unhappiness of his life—they take a leap of faith and only examine a small part of her face, with the rest of her body covered, potentially hiding something unpleasant or contagious. Not all men are wise enough to choose a woman solely for her good traits, and even wise men recognize that physical appearance can significantly impact a person's mindset. It’s evident that a serious deformity can be concealed under clothing and could completely alienate a man from his wife when it’s too late to separate; if such a discovery happens after marriage, the man has no option but to endure. Therefore, they believe it’s reasonable to have strong measures in place to guard against such deceptive practices.”

“There was so much the more reason for them to make a regulation in this matter, because they are the only people of those parts that neither allow of polygamy nor of divorces, except in the case of adultery or insufferable perverseness, for in these cases the Senate dissolves the marriage and grants the injured person leave to marry again; but the guilty are made infamous and are never allowed the privilege of a second marriage. None are suffered to put away their wives against their wills, from any great calamity that may have fallen on their persons, for they look on it as the height of cruelty and treachery to abandon either of the married persons when they need most the tender care of their consort, and that chiefly in the case of old age, which, as it carries many diseases along with it, so it is a disease of itself. But it frequently falls out that when a married couple do not well agree, they, by mutual consent, separate, and find out other persons with whom they hope they may live more happily; yet this is not done without obtaining leave of the Senate, which never admits of a divorce but upon a strict inquiry made, both by the senators and their wives, into the grounds upon which it is desired, and even when they are satisfied concerning the reasons of it they go on but slowly, for they imagine that too great easiness in granting leave for new marriages would very much shake the kindness of married people. They punish severely those that defile the marriage bed; if both parties are married they are divorced, and the injured persons may marry one another, or whom they please, but the adulterer and the adulteress are condemned to slavery, yet if either of the injured persons cannot shake off the love of the married person they may live with them still in that state, but they must follow them to that labour to which the slaves are condemned, and sometimes the repentance of the condemned, together with the unshaken kindness of the innocent and injured person, has prevailed so far with the Prince that he has taken off the sentence; but those that relapse after they are once pardoned are punished with death.

There was even more reason for them to regulate this issue because they are the only people in that region who do not allow polygamy or divorce, except in cases of adultery or extreme misconduct. In those situations, the Senate ends the marriage and allows the affected person to remarry, but the guilty party is branded as infamous and can never marry again. No one is allowed to divorce their spouse against their will, regardless of any serious misfortunes that may have befallen them, as they see it as the ultimate cruelty and betrayal to abandon a spouse when they need their partner's support the most, especially in old age, which brings many ailments and is a burden in itself. However, it sometimes happens that when a married couple isn't getting along well, they mutually agree to separate and seek other partners with the hope of being happier, but this is only done with the Senate's permission. The Senate only allows divorce after a thorough investigation by both the senators and their wives into the reasons for the request, and even when they're satisfied with the reasons, the process is slow because they believe that being too lenient with remarriages could undermine the bond between married couples. They impose strict penalties on those who betray their marriage vows; if both parties are married, they're divorced, and the injured people can marry each other or anyone else they choose. However, the adulterer and adulteress are sentenced to slavery. If either of the wronged parties can't help but love their married partner, they can still live with them but must endure the same labor as the enslaved. Occasionally, the remorse of the condemned, along with the unwavering affection of the innocent party, has led the Prince to lift the sentence, but those who relapse after being pardoned face the death penalty.

“Their law does not determine the punishment for other crimes, but that is left to the Senate, to temper it according to the circumstances of the fact. Husbands have power to correct their wives and parents to chastise their children, unless the fault is so great that a public punishment is thought necessary for striking terror into others. For the most part slavery is the punishment even of the greatest crimes, for as that is no less terrible to the criminals themselves than death, so they think the preserving them in a state of servitude is more for the interest of the commonwealth than killing them, since, as their labour is a greater benefit to the public than their death could be, so the sight of their misery is a more lasting terror to other men than that which would be given by their death. If their slaves rebel, and will not bear their yoke and submit to the labour that is enjoined them, they are treated as wild beasts that cannot be kept in order, neither by a prison nor by their chains, and are at last put to death. But those who bear their punishment patiently, and are so much wrought on by that pressure that lies so hard on them, that it appears they are really more troubled for the crimes they have committed than for the miseries they suffer, are not out of hope, but that, at last, either the Prince will, by his prerogative, or the people, by their intercession, restore them again to their liberty, or, at least, very much mitigate their slavery. He that tempts a married woman to adultery is no less severely punished than he that commits it, for they believe that a deliberate design to commit a crime is equal to the fact itself, since its not taking effect does not make the person that miscarried in his attempt at all the less guilty.

“Their laws don’t set the punishment for other crimes; that’s up to the Senate, which decides based on the specifics of the case. Husbands can correct their wives, and parents can discipline their children, unless the wrongdoing is so serious that public punishment is deemed necessary to deter others. Generally, slavery is the punishment for even the worst crimes, as it’s no less daunting for the offenders than death. They believe keeping them in a state of servitude is better for society than killing them because their labor benefits the public more than their deaths would. Plus, witnessing their suffering provides a more lasting fear for others than their executions would. If slaves rebel and refuse to accept their labor, they are treated like wild animals that can’t be controlled, either by prison or chains, and ultimately are executed. However, those who endure their punishment patiently, to the point that they seem more distressed by their crimes than their suffering, still hold onto hope that either the Prince will, by his authority, or the people, through their pleas, will restore their freedom or at least significantly lessen their bondage. The person who lures a married woman into adultery is punished just as harshly as the one who actually commits it because they believe that intent to commit a crime is equivalent to the crime itself; failing in the attempt doesn’t lessen the guilt of the person who tried.”

“They take great pleasure in fools, and as it is thought a base and unbecoming thing to use them ill, so they do not think it amiss for people to divert themselves with their folly; and, in their opinion, this is a great advantage to the fools themselves; for if men were so sullen and severe as not at all to please themselves with their ridiculous behaviour and foolish sayings, which is all that they can do to recommend themselves to others, it could not be expected that they would be so well provided for nor so tenderly used as they must otherwise be. If any man should reproach another for his being misshaped or imperfect in any part of his body, it would not at all be thought a reflection on the person so treated, but it would be accounted scandalous in him that had upbraided another with what he could not help. It is thought a sign of a sluggish and sordid mind not to preserve carefully one’s natural beauty; but it is likewise infamous among them to use paint. They all see that no beauty recommends a wife so much to her husband as the probity of her life and her obedience; for as some few are caught and held only by beauty, so all are attracted by the other excellences which charm all the world.

They really enjoy fools, and while it's seen as dishonorable and inappropriate to treat them badly, they don't think there's anything wrong with having fun at their expense. In their view, this actually benefits the fools because if people were too serious to enjoy their silly behavior and foolish remarks—which is all they have to offer—then they wouldn’t be taken care of as well or treated with as much kindness as they otherwise would be. If someone were to insult another for their physical imperfections, it wouldn’t be seen as a criticism of the person being insulted, but rather as shameful for the one making the insult since it’s something beyond their control. It’s believed that having a lazy and low-minded attitude is shown by not taking care of one’s natural beauty, yet it’s also frowned upon to wear makeup. Everyone understands that no beauty makes a wife more appealing to her husband than her integrity and obedience; while a few might be captivated just by looks, the qualities that truly attract everyone are the other virtues that appeal to all.

“As they fright men from committing crimes by punishments, so they invite them to the love of virtue by public honours; therefore they erect statues to the memories of such worthy men as have deserved well of their country, and set these in their market-places, both to perpetuate the remembrance of their actions and to be an incitement to their posterity to follow their example.

“As they scare people away from committing crimes through punishments, they also encourage them to embrace virtue with public honors. That’s why they build statues to honor those deserving individuals who have served their country well and place these in public squares, both to keep the memory of their deeds alive and to inspire future generations to follow their example."

“If any man aspires to any office he is sure never to compass it. They all live easily together, for none of the magistrates are either insolent or cruel to the people; they affect rather to be called fathers, and, by being really so, they well deserve the name; and the people pay them all the marks of honour the more freely because none are exacted from them. The Prince himself has no distinction, either of garments or of a crown; but is only distinguished by a sheaf of corn carried before him; as the High Priest is also known by his being preceded by a person carrying a wax light.

“If anyone aims for any position, they're unlikely to achieve it. They all get along well because none of the officials are arrogant or cruel to the people; they prefer to be called fathers, and they truly deserve that title. The people show them respect freely because none is demanded from them. The Prince himself has no special clothing or crown; he is only recognized by a sheaf of corn carried in front of him, just as the High Priest is known by having someone carry a wax light ahead of him.”

“They have but few laws, and such is their constitution that they need not many. They very much condemn other nations whose laws, together with the commentaries on them, swell up to so many volumes; for they think it an unreasonable thing to oblige men to obey a body of laws that are both of such a bulk, and so dark as not to be read and understood by every one of the subjects.

“They have very few laws, and their system is designed so they don’t need many. They strongly criticize other countries whose laws, along with the commentaries on them, fill so many volumes; they believe it’s unreasonable to require people to follow a set of laws that are both so extensive and unclear that not all citizens can read and understand them.”

“They have no lawyers among them, for they consider them as a sort of people whose profession it is to disguise matters and to wrest the laws, and, therefore, they think it is much better that every man should plead his own cause, and trust it to the judge, as in other places the client trusts it to a counsellor; by this means they both cut off many delays and find out truth more certainly; for after the parties have laid open the merits of the cause, without those artifices which lawyers are apt to suggest, the judge examines the whole matter, and supports the simplicity of such well-meaning persons, whom otherwise crafty men would be sure to run down; and thus they avoid those evils which appear very remarkably among all those nations that labour under a vast load of laws. Every one of them is skilled in their law; for, as it is a very short study, so the plainest meaning of which words are capable is always the sense of their laws; and they argue thus: all laws are promulgated for this end, that every man may know his duty; and, therefore, the plainest and most obvious sense of the words is that which ought to be put upon them, since a more refined exposition cannot be easily comprehended, and would only serve to make the laws become useless to the greater part of mankind, and especially to those who need most the direction of them; for it is all one not to make a law at all or to couch it in such terms that, without a quick apprehension and much study, a man cannot find out the true meaning of it, since the generality of mankind are both so dull, and so much employed in their several trades, that they have neither the leisure nor the capacity requisite for such an inquiry.

“They don’t have any lawyers among them because they see them as people who twist the truth and manipulate the law. So, they believe it’s much better for everyone to represent themselves and trust the judge, just like in other places clients rely on a counselor. This approach cuts down on many delays and helps reveal the truth more reliably. Once the parties present their case without the tricks lawyers might suggest, the judge reviews everything and supports the honesty of those well-meaning individuals, who would otherwise be taken advantage of by deceitful people. This way, they avoid the problems that are noticeable in nations burdened by a complicated legal system. Everyone is knowledgeable about their laws; because it’s a quick study, the clearest meaning of the words is always how the laws should be interpreted. They argue that all laws are meant to ensure that everyone knows their responsibilities; therefore, the most straightforward interpretation is the one that should be applied. A more complicated understanding would be difficult for most people to grasp and would only make the laws useless to the majority, especially those who need guidance the most. Essentially, it’s the same as not having a law at all if it’s written in such a way that a person can’t grasp its true meaning without sharp insight and considerable effort. Most people are too busy with their work and don’t have the time or ability needed for such inquiries.”

“Some of their neighbours, who are masters of their own liberties (having long ago, by the assistance of the Utopians, shaken off the yoke of tyranny, and being much taken with those virtues which they observe among them), have come to desire that they would send magistrates to govern them, some changing them every year, and others every five years; at the end of their government they bring them back to Utopia, with great expressions of honour and esteem, and carry away others to govern in their stead. In this they seem to have fallen upon a very good expedient for their own happiness and safety; for since the good or ill condition of a nation depends so much upon their magistrates, they could not have made a better choice than by pitching on men whom no advantages can bias; for wealth is of no use to them, since they must so soon go back to their own country, and they, being strangers among them, are not engaged in any of their heats or animosities; and it is certain that when public judicatories are swayed, either by avarice or partial affections, there must follow a dissolution of justice, the chief sinew of society.

“Some of their neighbors, who are in control of their own freedoms (having long ago, with the help of the Utopians, freed themselves from tyranny, and being quite impressed by the virtues they see in them), have come to want them to send magistrates to govern them, some changing them every year and others every five years. At the end of their term, they return them to Utopia with great honors and respect, and take others to govern in their place. This seems to be a smart solution for their happiness and safety; since the well-being of a nation relies heavily on its magistrates, they couldn't have made a better choice than selecting men who are not influenced by personal gain. Wealth doesn't benefit them, as they must soon return to their own country, and being outsiders, they aren't caught up in local disputes or rivalries. It’s clear that when public decision-making is influenced by greed or favoritism, it leads to a breakdown of justice, which is the foundation of society.”

“The Utopians call those nations that come and ask magistrates from them Neighbours; but those to whom they have been of more particular service, Friends; and as all other nations are perpetually either making leagues or breaking them, they never enter into an alliance with any state. They think leagues are useless things, and believe that if the common ties of humanity do not knit men together, the faith of promises will have no great effect; and they are the more confirmed in this by what they see among the nations round about them, who are no strict observers of leagues and treaties. We know how religiously they are observed in Europe, more particularly where the Christian doctrine is received, among whom they are sacred and inviolable! which is partly owing to the justice and goodness of the princes themselves, and partly to the reverence they pay to the popes, who, as they are the most religious observers of their own promises, so they exhort all other princes to perform theirs, and, when fainter methods do not prevail, they compel them to it by the severity of the pastoral censure, and think that it would be the most indecent thing possible if men who are particularly distinguished by the title of ‘The Faithful’ should not religiously keep the faith of their treaties. But in that new-found world, which is not more distant from us in situation than the people are in their manners and course of life, there is no trusting to leagues, even though they were made with all the pomp of the most sacred ceremonies; on the contrary, they are on this account the sooner broken, some slight pretence being found in the words of the treaties, which are purposely couched in such ambiguous terms that they can never be so strictly bound but they will always find some loophole to escape at, and thus they break both their leagues and their faith; and this is done with such impudence, that those very men who value themselves on having suggested these expedients to their princes would, with a haughty scorn, declaim against such craft; or, to speak plainer, such fraud and deceit, if they found private men make use of it in their bargains, and would readily say that they deserved to be hanged.

The Utopians refer to countries that come to them for help as Neighbours; those they’ve helped more specifically are called Friends. While other nations are constantly forming and breaking alliances, they choose not to enter any treaties. They believe alliances are pointless and think that if the common bonds of humanity don’t connect people, promises won’t mean much either. They are further convinced of this by observing neighboring nations, which don’t adhere strictly to treaties. We can see how religiously treaties are observed in Europe, especially among those who practice Christianity. Among them, treaties are sacred and untouchable! This is partly because of the fairness and integrity of their leaders, and partly due to the respect they show for the popes, who, as the most devoted observers of their own promises, encourage all leaders to honor theirs and, when gentle persuasion fails, compel them through strict pastoral discipline. They believe it would be incredibly shameful for people designated as ‘The Faithful’ not to uphold their agreements. However, in that newly discovered world, which is no farther from us geographically than it is in terms of customs and lifestyles, there’s no trust in treaties, even if they’re made with the highest formality. In fact, this makes them easier to break as people find minor excuses in the wording of these agreements, which are intentionally vague enough that they can always find a way out, thus violating both their treaties and their integrity. This is done so brazenly that those who pride themselves on devising such tricks for their leaders would scornfully criticize such deceit if they observed ordinary individuals using it in their dealings, readily declaring that those people deserve to be hanged.

“By this means it is that all sort of justice passes in the world for a low-spirited and vulgar virtue, far below the dignity of royal greatness—or at least there are set up two sorts of justice; the one is mean and creeps on the ground, and, therefore, becomes none but the lower part of mankind, and so must be kept in severely by many restraints, that it may not break out beyond the bounds that are set to it; the other is the peculiar virtue of princes, which, as it is more majestic than that which becomes the rabble, so takes a freer compass, and thus lawful and unlawful are only measured by pleasure and interest. These practices of the princes that lie about Utopia, who make so little account of their faith, seem to be the reasons that determine them to engage in no confederacy. Perhaps they would change their mind if they lived among us; but yet, though treaties were more religiously observed, they would still dislike the custom of making them, since the world has taken up a false maxim upon it, as if there were no tie of nature uniting one nation to another, only separated perhaps by a mountain or a river, and that all were born in a state of hostility, and so might lawfully do all that mischief to their neighbours against which there is no provision made by treaties; and that when treaties are made they do not cut off the enmity or restrain the licence of preying upon each other, if, by the unskilfulness of wording them, there are not effectual provisoes made against them; they, on the other hand, judge that no man is to be esteemed our enemy that has never injured us, and that the partnership of human nature is instead of a league; and that kindness and good nature unite men more effectually and with greater strength than any agreements whatsoever, since thereby the engagements of men’s hearts become stronger than the bond and obligation of words.

By this means, all types of justice in the world are regarded as a lowly and common virtue, unworthy of royal greatness—or at least, there seem to be two kinds of justice; one is petty and drags along the ground, belonging only to the lower classes, and therefore has to be tightly controlled by numerous restraints to prevent it from crossing the limits set for it; the other is the unique virtue of rulers, which, being more majestic than what suits the common people, operates with more freedom, where lawful and unlawful are only determined by pleasure and self-interest. The practices of the princes surrounding Utopia, who hold their faith in little regard, seem to be reasons that lead them to avoid forming alliances. They might reconsider if they lived among us; however, even if treaties were more faithfully upheld, they would still resist the idea of making them, as society has adopted a false belief that there’s no natural bond uniting one nation to another, which are only separated by a mountain or a river, and that everyone is born into a state of hostility, allowing them to inflict harm on their neighbors that treaties don’t address. Moreover, when treaties are made, they don't eliminate enmity or restrain the freedom to prey on each other without clear provisions against it. Instead, they believe that no one should be considered our enemy if they have never wronged us, and that the shared nature of humanity serves as a bond stronger than any agreement; that kindness and goodwill unite people more effectively and powerfully than any agreements could, since the ties of people’s hearts are ultimately stronger than mere words.

OF THEIR MILITARY DISCIPLINE

They detest war as a very brutal thing, and which, to the reproach of human nature, is more practised by men than by any sort of beasts. They, in opposition to the sentiments of almost all other nations, think that there is nothing more inglorious than that glory that is gained by war; and therefore, though they accustom themselves daily to military exercises and the discipline of war, in which not only their men, but their women likewise, are trained up, that, in cases of necessity, they may not be quite useless, yet they do not rashly engage in war, unless it be either to defend themselves or their friends from any unjust aggressors, or, out of good nature or in compassion, assist an oppressed nation in shaking off the yoke of tyranny. They, indeed, help their friends not only in defensive but also in offensive wars; but they never do that unless they had been consulted before the breach was made, and, being satisfied with the grounds on which they went, they had found that all demands of reparation were rejected, so that a war was unavoidable. This they think to be not only just when one neighbour makes an inroad on another by public order, and carries away the spoils, but when the merchants of one country are oppressed in another, either under pretence of some unjust laws, or by the perverse wresting of good ones. This they count a juster cause of war than the other, because those injuries are done under some colour of laws. This was the only ground of that war in which they engaged with the Nephelogetes against the Aleopolitanes, a little before our time; for the merchants of the former having, as they thought, met with great injustice among the latter, which (whether it was in itself right or wrong) drew on a terrible war, in which many of their neighbours were engaged; and their keenness in carrying it on being supported by their strength in maintaining it, it not only shook some very flourishing states and very much afflicted others, but, after a series of much mischief ended in the entire conquest and slavery of the Aleopolitanes, who, though before the war they were in all respects much superior to the Nephelogetes, were yet subdued; but, though the Utopians had assisted them in the war, yet they pretended to no share of the spoil.

They really dislike war as a brutal thing, and, to the shame of human nature, it's more carried out by humans than any kind of animals. Contrary to the views of almost all other nations, they believe there is nothing more dishonorable than the glory achieved through war. Therefore, even though they practice military exercises and train for war daily, involving both men and women so that they won't be entirely useless in times of need, they do not rush into war unless it’s to defend themselves or their friends from unjust attackers, or to help an oppressed nation shake off the yoke of tyranny. They do assist their friends in both defensive and offensive wars, but only if they have been consulted beforehand and agree that all efforts for reparations were rejected, making war unavoidable. They see this as just not only when one neighbor invades another by public decree and takes their goods, but also when merchants from one country suffer in another due to unjust laws or a twisted interpretation of good laws. They consider this a more valid reason for war than the former, because the injuries are inflicted under the guise of law. This was the only reason for the war they fought with the Nephelogetes against the Aleopolitanes shortly before our time; the merchants of the former believed they faced great injustice from the latter, which led to a terrible war that drew in many of their neighbors. Their determination to continue was backed by their strength, shaking some prosperous states and severely affecting others, and ultimately resulting in the complete conquest and enslavement of the Aleopolitanes, who, despite being superior to the Nephelogetes in every way before the war, were subdued. However, even though the Utopians aided them in the conflict, they claimed no share of the spoils.

“But, though they so vigorously assist their friends in obtaining reparation for the injuries they have received in affairs of this nature, yet, if any such frauds were committed against themselves, provided no violence was done to their persons, they would only, on their being refused satisfaction, forbear trading with such a people. This is not because they consider their neighbours more than their own citizens; but, since their neighbours trade every one upon his own stock, fraud is a more sensible injury to them than it is to the Utopians, among whom the public, in such a case, only suffers, as they expect no thing in return for the merchandise they export but that in which they so much abound, and is of little use to them, the loss does not much affect them. They think, therefore, it would be too severe to revenge a loss attended with so little inconvenience, either to their lives or their subsistence, with the death of many persons; but if any of their people are either killed or wounded wrongfully, whether it be done by public authority, or only by private men, as soon as they hear of it they send ambassadors, and demand that the guilty persons may be delivered up to them, and if that is denied, they declare war; but if it be complied with, the offenders are condemned either to death or slavery.

“But, even though they strongly support their friends in getting compensation for the harms done to them in these situations, if any fraud was committed against themselves, and no violence was inflicted on them personally, they would simply stop trading with that group if they were denied satisfaction. This isn’t because they value their neighbors more than their own citizens; it’s just that their neighbors trade based on their own resources, so fraud is a more significant harm to them than it is to the Utopians. Among the Utopians, the public is the only one who suffers in such cases, as they expect nothing in return for the goods they export except for what they have in abundance, which is not very valuable to them, so the loss doesn’t affect them much. They feel it would be too harsh to seek revenge for a loss that causes so little inconvenience to their lives or livelihoods by killing many people. However, if any of their own are unjustly killed or injured, whether by public authority or by private individuals, as soon as they find out, they send ambassadors to demand that the guilty parties be handed over to them, and if that demand is refused, they declare war; but if their demand is met, the offenders face either death or slavery.”

“They would be both troubled and ashamed of a bloody victory over their enemies; and think it would be as foolish a purchase as to buy the most valuable goods at too high a rate. And in no victory do they glory so much as in that which is gained by dexterity and good conduct without bloodshed. In such cases they appoint public triumphs, and erect trophies to the honour of those who have succeeded; for then do they reckon that a man acts suitably to his nature, when he conquers his enemy in such a way as that no other creature but a man could be capable of, and that is by the strength of his understanding. Bears, lions, boars, wolves, and dogs, and all other animals, employ their bodily force one against another, in which, as many of them are superior to men, both in strength and fierceness, so they are all subdued by his reason and understanding.

They would feel both troubled and ashamed of a bloody victory over their enemies, thinking it would be as foolish as paying too much for the most valuable goods. They take more pride in victories won through skill and good management without bloodshed. In such cases, they hold public celebrations and build trophies to honor those who have succeeded; they believe a person acts in accordance with their true nature when they defeat an enemy in a way that only a human can—through the power of their intellect. Bears, lions, boars, wolves, dogs, and other animals use their physical strength against one another, and although many of them are stronger and fiercer than humans, they are all overcome by human reason and intelligence.

“The only design of the Utopians in war is to obtain that by force which, if it had been granted them in time, would have prevented the war; or, if that cannot be done, to take so severe a revenge on those that have injured them that they may be terrified from doing the like for the time to come. By these ends they measure all their designs, and manage them so, that it is visible that the appetite of fame or vainglory does not work so much on there as a just care of their own security.

“The only goal of the Utopians in war is to achieve through force what could have been given to them peacefully, which would have avoided the conflict; or, if that isn't possible, to retaliate so harshly against those who have harmed them that it discourages any future wrongdoing. They focus all their plans on these objectives and approach them in a way that clearly shows their motivation isn't driven by a desire for fame or glory, but rather a sincere concern for their own safety.”

“As soon as they declare war, they take care to have a great many schedules, that are sealed with their common seal, affixed in the most conspicuous places of their enemies’ country. This is carried secretly, and done in many places all at once. In these they promise great rewards to such as shall kill the prince, and lesser in proportion to such as shall kill any other persons who are those on whom, next to the prince himself, they cast the chief balance of the war. And they double the sum to him that, instead of killing the person so marked out, shall take him alive, and put him in their hands. They offer not only indemnity, but rewards, to such of the persons themselves that are so marked, if they will act against their countrymen. By this means those that are named in their schedules become not only distrustful of their fellow-citizens, but are jealous of one another, and are much distracted by fear and danger; for it has often fallen out that many of them, and even the prince himself, have been betrayed, by those in whom they have trusted most; for the rewards that the Utopians offer are so immeasurably great, that there is no sort of crime to which men cannot be drawn by them. They consider the risk that those run who undertake such services, and offer a recompense proportioned to the danger—not only a vast deal of gold, but great revenues in lands, that lie among other nations that are their friends, where they may go and enjoy them very securely; and they observe the promises they make of their kind most religiously. They very much approve of this way of corrupting their enemies, though it appears to others to be base and cruel; but they look on it as a wise course, to make an end of what would be otherwise a long war, without so much as hazarding one battle to decide it. They think it likewise an act of mercy and love to mankind to prevent the great slaughter of those that must otherwise be killed in the progress of the war, both on their own side and on that of their enemies, by the death of a few that are most guilty; and that in so doing they are kind even to their enemies, and pity them no less than their own people, as knowing that the greater part of them do not engage in the war of their own accord, but are driven into it by the passions of their prince.

“As soon as they declare war, they make sure to post numerous schedules, sealed with their official mark, in the most visible locations of their enemy's territory. This is done secretly and simultaneously in many places. In these notices, they promise significant rewards for anyone who kills the prince, and smaller rewards for those who kill anyone else they see as key in the conflict, right after the prince himself. They double the amount for anyone who can capture the marked individual alive and hand them over. They not only offer protection but also rewards to those named in the notices if they betray their fellow citizens. This tactic makes those listed distrustful of their neighbors and suspicious of one another, filled with fear and danger; it has often happened that many, including the prince, have been betrayed by those they trusted the most. The rewards offered by the Utopians are so incredibly generous that there’s no crime people wouldn’t consider committing for them. They acknowledge the risks that those who take on such tasks face, and they provide compensation that matches the danger—not just a lot of gold, but also substantial land holdings among friendly nations, where they can live securely. They are very serious about keeping the promises they make. They strongly support this method of undermining their enemies, even though others may see it as dishonorable and cruel; they view it as a smart way to quickly end what would otherwise be a prolonged war without risking a single battle. They also believe it shows mercy and love for humanity by preventing the massive loss of life that would occur during the war, both for their side and the enemy's, by eliminating a few of the most guilty; they feel that in doing this, they are kind even to their adversaries and care for them just as much as for their own people, knowing that most of those involved don’t fight out of choice but are compelled by their leaders' passions.”

“If this method does not succeed with them, then they sow seeds of contention among their enemies, and animate the prince’s brother, or some of the nobility, to aspire to the crown. If they cannot disunite them by domestic broils, then they engage their neighbours against them, and make them set on foot some old pretensions, which are never wanting to princes when they have occasion for them. These they plentifully supply with money, though but very sparingly with any auxiliary troops; for they are so tender of their own people that they would not willingly exchange one of them, even with the prince of their enemies’ country.

“If this method doesn’t work with them, they stir up conflict among their enemies and encourage the prince’s brother or some of the nobility to vie for the crown. If they can’t divide them through internal strife, they turn their neighbors against them and revive some old claims, which princes always have on hand when they need them. They generously provide these claims with money, but are very reluctant to send any additional troops; they are so protective of their own people that they wouldn’t want to risk even one of them, even for the prince of their enemies’ country.”

“But as they keep their gold and silver only for such an occasion, so, when that offers itself, they easily part with it; since it would be no convenience to them, though they should reserve nothing of it to themselves. For besides the wealth that they have among them at home, they have a vast treasure abroad; many nations round about them being deep in their debt: so that they hire soldiers from all places for carrying on their wars; but chiefly from the Zapolets, who live five hundred miles east of Utopia. They are a rude, wild, and fierce nation, who delight in the woods and rocks, among which they were born and bred up. They are hardened both against heat, cold, and labour, and know nothing of the delicacies of life. They do not apply themselves to agriculture, nor do they care either for their houses or their clothes: cattle is all that they look after; and for the greatest part they live either by hunting or upon rapine; and are made, as it were, only for war. They watch all opportunities of engaging in it, and very readily embrace such as are offered them. Great numbers of them will frequently go out, and offer themselves for a very low pay, to serve any that will employ them: they know none of the arts of life, but those that lead to the taking it away; they serve those that hire them, both with much courage and great fidelity; but will not engage to serve for any determined time, and agree upon such terms, that the next day they may go over to the enemies of those whom they serve if they offer them a greater encouragement; and will, perhaps, return to them the day after that upon a higher advance of their pay. There are few wars in which they make not a considerable part of the armies of both sides: so it often falls out that they who are related, and were hired in the same country, and so have lived long and familiarly together, forgetting both their relations and former friendship, kill one another upon no other consideration than that of being hired to it for a little money by princes of different interests; and such a regard have they for money that they are easily wrought on by the difference of one penny a day to change sides. So entirely does their avarice influence them; and yet this money, which they value so highly, is of little use to them; for what they purchase thus with their blood they quickly waste on luxury, which among them is but of a poor and miserable form.

“But as they keep their gold and silver only for special occasions, when the time comes, they easily let it go; it wouldn’t benefit them if they held onto it. Besides the wealth they have at home, they also have a huge treasure abroad; many nearby nations are heavily in their debt. They hire soldiers from everywhere to fight their wars, especially from the Zapolets, who live five hundred miles east of Utopia. They are a rough, wild, and fierce people who thrive in the woods and rocks where they were born and raised. They are tough against heat, cold, and hard work, and they don’t know anything about the luxuries of life. They don’t practice agriculture, nor do they care about their homes or clothes; they focus only on cattle, and mostly live by hunting or stealing, as if they were made solely for war. They look for every opportunity to engage in battles and eagerly take advantage of any that come their way. Large numbers of them often go out and offer their services for very low pay to anyone who will hire them; they know none of the skills of life, except those that involve taking it away. They fight for those who employ them with courage and loyalty, but won’t commit to serving for a set period. They make agreements that allow them to switch sides to the enemies of those they serve if offered a better deal, and they might just as easily return to their original employers if they are offered a higher wage. There are few wars in which they don’t make up a significant portion of the armies on both sides. It often happens that those who are related and have been hired from the same region, having lived together for a long time, forget their relationships and past friendships, killing each other simply because they’ve been paid a small amount by different princes. They have such a strong attachment to money that they can easily be swayed by a difference of a single penny a day to switch allegiance. Their greed influences them completely; yet this money, which they value so highly, is of little use to them, as what they buy with their blood is quickly wasted on luxuries, which for them are of a poor and miserable sort.”

“This nation serves the Utopians against all people whatsoever, for they pay higher than any other. The Utopians hold this for a maxim, that as they seek out the best sort of men for their own use at home, so they make use of this worst sort of men for the consumption of war; and therefore they hire them with the offers of vast rewards to expose themselves to all sorts of hazards, out of which the greater part never returns to claim their promises; yet they make them good most religiously to such as escape. This animates them to adventure again, whenever there is occasion for it; for the Utopians are not at all troubled how many of these happen to be killed, and reckon it a service done to mankind if they could be a means to deliver the world from such a lewd and vicious sort of people, that seem to have run together, as to the drain of human nature. Next to these, they are served in their wars with those upon whose account they undertake them, and with the auxiliary troops of their other friends, to whom they join a few of their own people, and send some man of eminent and approved virtue to command in chief. There are two sent with him, who, during his command, are but private men, but the first is to succeed him if he should happen to be either killed or taken; and, in case of the like misfortune to him, the third comes in his place; and thus they provide against all events, that such accidents as may befall their generals may not endanger their armies. When they draw out troops of their own people, they take such out of every city as freely offer themselves, for none are forced to go against their wills, since they think that if any man is pressed that wants courage, he will not only act faintly, but by his cowardice dishearten others. But if an invasion is made on their country, they make use of such men, if they have good bodies, though they are not brave; and either put them aboard their ships, or place them on the walls of their towns, that being so posted, they may find no opportunity of flying away; and thus either shame, the heat of action, or the impossibility of flying, bears down their cowardice; they often make a virtue of necessity, and behave themselves well, because nothing else is left them. But as they force no man to go into any foreign war against his will, so they do not hinder those women who are willing to go along with their husbands; on the contrary, they encourage and praise them, and they stand often next their husbands in the front of the army. They also place together those who are related, parents, and children, kindred, and those that are mutually allied, near one another; that those whom nature has inspired with the greatest zeal for assisting one another may be the nearest and readiest to do it; and it is matter of great reproach if husband or wife survive one another, or if a child survives his parent, and therefore when they come to be engaged in action, they continue to fight to the last man, if their enemies stand before them: and as they use all prudent methods to avoid the endangering their own men, and if it is possible let all the action and danger fall upon the troops that they hire, so if it becomes necessary for themselves to engage, they then charge with as much courage as they avoided it before with prudence: nor is it a fierce charge at first, but it increases by degrees; and as they continue in action, they grow more obstinate, and press harder upon the enemy, insomuch that they will much sooner die than give ground; for the certainty that their children will be well looked after when they are dead frees them from all that anxiety concerning them which often masters men of great courage; and thus they are animated by a noble and invincible resolution. Their skill in military affairs increases their courage: and the wise sentiments which, according to the laws of their country, are instilled into them in their education, give additional vigour to their minds: for as they do not undervalue life so as prodigally to throw it away, they are not so indecently fond of it as to preserve it by base and unbecoming methods. In the greatest heat of action the bravest of their youth, who have devoted themselves to that service, single out the general of their enemies, set on him either openly or by ambuscade; pursue him everywhere, and when spent and wearied out, are relieved by others, who never give over the pursuit, either attacking him with close weapons when they can get near him, or with those which wound at a distance, when others get in between them. So that, unless he secures himself by flight, they seldom fail at last to kill or to take him prisoner. When they have obtained a victory, they kill as few as possible, and are much more bent on taking many prisoners than on killing those that fly before them. Nor do they ever let their men so loose in the pursuit of their enemies as not to retain an entire body still in order; so that if they have been forced to engage the last of their battalions before they could gain the day, they will rather let their enemies all escape than pursue them when their own army is in disorder; remembering well what has often fallen out to themselves, that when the main body of their army has been quite defeated and broken, when their enemies, imagining the victory obtained, have let themselves loose into an irregular pursuit, a few of them that lay for a reserve, waiting a fit opportunity, have fallen on them in their chase, and when straggling in disorder, and apprehensive of no danger, but counting the day their own, have turned the whole action, and, wresting out of their hands a victory that seemed certain and undoubted, while the vanquished have suddenly become victorious.

“This nation serves the Utopians against everyone else because they pay more than anyone else. The Utopians believe that while they seek out the best people for their own use at home, they utilize the worst for warfare. They hire these individuals with the promise of huge rewards to expose themselves to all kinds of dangers, most of whom never come back to claim what they were promised; however, they fulfill those promises to those who do survive. This motivates them to take risks again whenever the opportunity arises, as the Utopians don’t really care how many of these individuals get killed. They see it as a service to humanity if they can help rid the world of such corrupt and wicked individuals, who seem to represent the worst of human nature. In addition, they have troops for their wars based on the reasons for undertaking them, along with auxiliary forces from their allies, to whom they send a mix of their own people, along with a man of notable and proven virtue to lead. They send two individuals with him, who, while under his command, are considered regular soldiers; the first one is designated to replace him if he gets killed or captured, and in case that happens, the third person steps in. This way, they prepare for all scenarios, ensuring that any misfortune that befalls their leaders does not endanger their armies. When they mobilize their own troops, they select volunteers from each city, as no one is forced into service against their will. They believe that if someone is compelled to fight without courage, they will not only perform poorly but also discourage others with their cowardice. However, if their country is invaded, they utilize anyone with good physical capabilities, even if they lack bravery, placing them on ships or on the walls of their cities to prevent their escape. Thus, whether it's out of shame, the heat of battle, or the impossibility of fleeing, they often rise to the occasion and handle themselves well because they have no other choice. While they don’t force anyone to join foreign wars against their will, they encourage and praise women who want to accompany their husbands, often standing alongside them at the front lines. They also group relatives—parents, children, and close kin—together so that those who are most motivated to support each other can readily do so. It is considered a great disgrace if a husband or wife outlives one another, or if a child survives a parent, so when engaged in battle, they fight to the last person if their enemies are present. They use every sensible strategy to avoid putting their own men in danger, aiming to let the hired troops bear the brunt of the action and danger first. But if it becomes necessary for them to fight, they charge with as much courage as they previously avoided it with caution. Their charge isn't fierce at first, but it builds over time; as they continue fighting, they become more determined, pressing harder against the enemy—often choosing to die rather than give ground. Knowing that their children will be cared for after their deaths frees them from the anxiety about their families that often burdens brave men, fueling them with a noble and unwavering resolve. Their military skills enhance their courage, and the wise lessons they learn from their education imbue them with additional strength of mind; they do not undervalue life to the point of recklessly throwing it away, yet they’re not obsessively attached to it in ways that lead them to preserve it through dishonorable means. In the heat of battle, the bravest young men dedicated to service target the enemy general, attacking him either openly or via ambush, pursuing him relentlessly. When they tire, they are replaced by others who never cease the chase, either fighting him with close-range weapons when they get near or wounding him from a distance when others intervene. Thus, unless he escapes, they seldom fail to either kill him or capture him. After a victory, they aim to kill as few as possible, focusing more on capturing prisoners than on killing those who are fleeing. They also maintain discipline in their forces during enemy pursuits, ensuring that their own unit remains intact. So, if they are forced to engage the last of their battalions before achieving victory, they prefer to let their enemies escape rather than pursue them while their own army is disorganized, recalling instances when a defeated army, thinking they had won, pursued recklessly, only to be ambushed by a few who had remained in reserve, reversing what seemed to be a certain victory.”

“It is hard to tell whether they are more dexterous in laying or avoiding ambushes. They sometimes seem to fly when it is far from their thoughts; and when they intend to give ground, they do it so that it is very hard to find out their design. If they see they are ill posted, or are like to be overpowered by numbers, they then either march off in the night with great silence, or by some stratagem delude their enemies. If they retire in the day-time, they do it in such order that it is no less dangerous to fall upon them in a retreat than in a march. They fortify their camps with a deep and large trench; and throw up the earth that is dug out of it for a wall; nor do they employ only their slaves in this, but the whole army works at it, except those that are then upon the guard; so that when so many hands are at work, a great line and a strong fortification is finished in so short a time that it is scarce credible. Their armour is very strong for defence, and yet is not so heavy as to make them uneasy in their marches; they can even swim with it. All that are trained up to war practise swimming. Both horse and foot make great use of arrows, and are very expert. They have no swords, but fight with a pole-axe that is both sharp and heavy, by which they thrust or strike down an enemy. They are very good at finding out warlike machines, and disguise them so well that the enemy does not perceive them till he feels the use of them; so that he cannot prepare such a defence as would render them useless; the chief consideration had in the making them is that they may be easily carried and managed.

“It’s tough to tell if they’re better at setting traps or dodging them. They sometimes seem to escape when they're not even thinking about it, and when they plan to retreat, they do it in a way that makes it hard to figure out their strategy. If they realize their position is weak or they might be outnumbered, they either slip away silently at night or trick their enemies with some clever plan. When they pull back during the day, they do it in such an organized way that attacking them while they're retreating is just as risky as hitting them while they’re advancing. They fortify their camps with a deep, wide trench and use the dirt they dig out to build a wall. They don’t just have their slaves do this; everyone in the army helps out, except for those on guard duty, so with so many people working together, they can set up a strong defense in no time at all. Their armor is very protective but light enough to allow for easy movement, and they can even swim while wearing it. Everyone trained for battle practices swimming. Both cavalry and infantry make good use of arrows and are very skilled with them. They don’t have swords, but they fight with a sharp, heavy poleaxe that they can use to thrust or strike down an opponent. They are excellent at coming up with war machines and disguise them so well that the enemy doesn’t notice until it’s too late, leaving them unprepared for a defense that could render those machines ineffective. The main focus in creating these machines is that they should be easy to carry and operate.”

“If they agree to a truce, they observe it so religiously that no provocations will make them break it. They never lay their enemies’ country waste nor burn their corn, and even in their marches they take all possible care that neither horse nor foot may tread it down, for they do not know but that they may have use for it themselves. They hurt no man whom they find disarmed, unless he is a spy. When a town is surrendered to them, they take it into their protection; and when they carry a place by storm they never plunder it, but put those only to the sword that oppose the rendering of it up, and make the rest of the garrison slaves, but for the other inhabitants, they do them no hurt; and if any of them had advised a surrender, they give them good rewards out of the estates of those that they condemn, and distribute the rest among their auxiliary troops, but they themselves take no share of the spoil.

“If they agree to a truce, they stick to it so strictly that no provocations will make them break it. They never destroy their enemies’ land or burn their crops, and even while marching, they take every precaution to ensure that neither horse nor foot tramples it down, since they don’t know when they might need it themselves. They hurt no one who is disarmed, unless he is a spy. When a town surrenders to them, they protect it; and when they take a place by force, they never loot it, but instead only kill those who resist the surrender and make the rest of the garrison slaves. As for the other inhabitants, they do them no harm; if any of them had advised a surrender, they reward them with good rewards from the estates of those they condemn and share the rest among their auxiliary troops, but they themselves take no share of the spoils.

“When a war is ended, they do not oblige their friends to reimburse their expenses; but they obtain them of the conquered, either in money, which they keep for the next occasion, or in lands, out of which a constant revenue is to be paid them; by many increases the revenue which they draw out from several countries on such occasions is now risen to above 700,000 ducats a year. They send some of their own people to receive these revenues, who have orders to live magnificently and like princes, by which means they consume much of it upon the place; and either bring over the rest to Utopia or lend it to that nation in which it lies. This they most commonly do, unless some great occasion, which falls out but very seldom, should oblige them to call for it all. It is out of these lands that they assign rewards to such as they encourage to adventure on desperate attempts. If any prince that engages in war with them is making preparations for invading their country, they prevent him, and make his country the seat of the war; for they do not willingly suffer any war to break in upon their island; and if that should happen, they would only defend themselves by their own people; but would not call for auxiliary troops to their assistance.

“When a war ends, they don’t require their allies to pay them back for their expenses; instead, they collect from the conquered, either in cash, which they save for future needs, or in land, from which they receive a steady income. The revenue they gather from various countries in such situations has now increased to over 700,000 ducats a year. They send some of their own people to collect these revenues, who are instructed to live lavishly and like royalty, which results in them spending a lot of it locally; they either bring the remainder back to Utopia or lend it to the country where it is collected. This is what they usually do, unless some rare major situation forces them to demand it all at once. From these lands, they allocate rewards to those they encourage to take on risky ventures. If any prince planning to engage in war with them starts preparing to invade their territory, they take action first and make his land the battleground; they prefer not to let any war disturb their island. If it were to happen, they would only rely on their own people to defend themselves and would not call for extra troops to assist them.”

OF THE RELIGIONS OF THE UTOPIANS

“There are several sorts of religions, not only in different parts of the island, but even in every town; some worshipping the sun, others the moon or one of the planets. Some worship such men as have been eminent in former times for virtue or glory, not only as ordinary deities, but as the supreme god. Yet the greater and wiser sort of them worship none of these, but adore one eternal, invisible, infinite, and incomprehensible Deity; as a Being that is far above all our apprehensions, that is spread over the whole universe, not by His bulk, but by His power and virtue; Him they call the Father of All, and acknowledge that the beginnings, the increase, the progress, the vicissitudes, and the end of all things come only from Him; nor do they offer divine honours to any but to Him alone. And, indeed, though they differ concerning other things, yet all agree in this: that they think there is one Supreme Being that made and governs the world, whom they call, in the language of their country, Mithras. They differ in this: that one thinks the god whom he worships is this Supreme Being, and another thinks that his idol is that god; but they all agree in one principle, that whoever is this Supreme Being, He is also that great essence to whose glory and majesty all honours are ascribed by the consent of all nations.

“There are many types of religions, not just in different parts of the island, but even in every town; some worship the sun, others the moon or one of the planets. Some venerate those who were notable in the past for their virtue or achievements, not only as ordinary gods but as the supreme God. Yet the more enlightened among them worship none of these, but rather adore one eternal, invisible, infinite, and incomprehensible Deity; a Being that is far beyond our understanding, that pervades the entire universe, not by His size, but by His power and virtue; they call Him the Father of All, recognizing that the origins, growth, development, changes, and conclusion of all things come solely from Him; they offer divine honors only to Him. Indeed, although they may differ on other matters, they all agree on this: that they believe there is one Supreme Being who created and governs the world, whom they refer to in their native language as Mithras. They do differ in this: one person believes the god they worship is this Supreme Being, and another thinks that their idol represents that god; but they all share the principle that whoever this Supreme Being is, He is also the great essence to whom all honors and praises are attributed by the consensus of all nations.”

“By degrees they fall off from the various superstitions that are among them, and grow up to that one religion that is the best and most in request; and there is no doubt to be made, but that all the others had vanished long ago, if some of those who advised them to lay aside their superstitions had not met with some unhappy accidents, which, being considered as inflicted by heaven, made them afraid that the god whose worship had like to have been abandoned had interposed and revenged themselves on those who despised their authority.

“Gradually, they move away from the various superstitions that exist among them and embrace the one religion that is the most respected and sought after. There's no doubt that all the other superstitions would have disappeared long ago if some of those who urged them to abandon their beliefs hadn’t encountered some unfortunate events. These events were seen as punishments from above, making them fear that the god whose worship was about to be forsaken had intervened and sought retribution against those who disregarded their authority.”

“After they had heard from us an account of the doctrine, the course of life, and the miracles of Christ, and of the wonderful constancy of so many martyrs, whose blood, so willingly offered up by them, was the chief occasion of spreading their religion over a vast number of nations, it is not to be imagined how inclined they were to receive it. I shall not determine whether this proceeded from any secret inspiration of God, or whether it was because it seemed so favourable to that community of goods, which is an opinion so particular as well as so dear to them; since they perceived that Christ and His followers lived by that rule, and that it was still kept up in some communities among the sincerest sort of Christians. From whichsoever of these motives it might be, true it is, that many of them came over to our religion, and were initiated into it by baptism. But as two of our number were dead, so none of the four that survived were in priests’ orders, we, therefore, could only baptise them, so that, to our great regret, they could not partake of the other sacraments, that can only be administered by priests, but they are instructed concerning them and long most vehemently for them. They have had great disputes among themselves, whether one chosen by them to be a priest would not be thereby qualified to do all the things that belong to that character, even though he had no authority derived from the Pope, and they seemed to be resolved to choose some for that employment, but they had not done it when I left them.

“After they heard from us about the teachings, way of life, and miracles of Christ, as well as the remarkable dedication of many martyrs, whose blood was willingly shed and played a major role in spreading their faith across numerous nations, it’s hard to imagine how eager they were to embrace it. I won’t say whether this was due to some divine inspiration or because it aligned with their belief in a communal way of living, which is a viewpoint that is both unique and cherished by them; since they recognized that Christ and His followers lived by that principle, and it continues to be practiced in some communities among the most genuine Christians. Whatever the reason, it's true that many of them converted to our faith and were baptized. However, since two of our members had died and none of the four survivors were ordained priests, we could only baptize them. Unfortunately, they couldn't receive the other sacraments, which can only be administered by priests, but they have been educated about them and strongly desire them. They've had significant debates among themselves over whether someone chosen by them as a priest would have the authority to perform all the tasks related to that role, even without formal approval from the Pope, and they seemed determined to select some for that role, though they hadn’t done so by the time I left them.”

“Those among them that have not received our religion do not fright any from it, and use none ill that goes over to it, so that all the while I was there one man was only punished on this occasion. He being newly baptised did, notwithstanding all that we could say to the contrary, dispute publicly concerning the Christian religion, with more zeal than discretion, and with so much heat, that he not only preferred our worship to theirs, but condemned all their rites as profane, and cried out against all that adhered to them as impious and sacrilegious persons, that were to be damned to everlasting burnings. Upon his having frequently preached in this manner he was seized, and after trial he was condemned to banishment, not for having disparaged their religion, but for his inflaming the people to sedition; for this is one of their most ancient laws, that no man ought to be punished for his religion. At the first constitution of their government, Utopus having understood that before his coming among them the old inhabitants had been engaged in great quarrels concerning religion, by which they were so divided among themselves, that he found it an easy thing to conquer them, since, instead of uniting their forces against him, every different party in religion fought by themselves. After he had subdued them he made a law that every man might be of what religion he pleased, and might endeavour to draw others to it by the force of argument and by amicable and modest ways, but without bitterness against those of other opinions; but that he ought to use no other force but that of persuasion, and was neither to mix with it reproaches nor violence; and such as did otherwise were to be condemned to banishment or slavery.

“Those among them who haven't adopted our religion don't scare anyone away from it, and they don't mistreat anyone who does convert. During my entire time there, only one person was punished for this. He had just been baptized and, despite all our efforts to dissuade him, publicly debated the Christian faith with more passion than wisdom. He was so intense that he not only preferred our worship to theirs but also condemned all their rituals as unholy, calling everyone who followed them wicked and sacrilegious, saying they deserved eternal damnation. After he preached in this way several times, he was arrested, and after a trial, he was sentenced to exile—not for criticizing their religion, but for inciting unrest among the people. This is due to one of their oldest laws, which states that no one should be punished for their beliefs. When Utopus first established their government, he realized that before his arrival, the local inhabitants had been deeply divided by religious disputes, making it easy for him to conquer them since instead of uniting against him, each religious faction fought on its own. Once he had defeated them, he enacted a law allowing everyone to follow the religion of their choice and to persuade others through reasoned and respectful dialogue, without any bitterness towards differing opinions. He insisted that no other methods should be used except for persuasion, and that reproach or violence should not be involved; those who acted otherwise would face exile or slavery.”

“This law was made by Utopus, not only for preserving the public peace, which he saw suffered much by daily contentions and irreconcilable heats, but because he thought the interest of religion itself required it. He judged it not fit to determine anything rashly; and seemed to doubt whether those different forms of religion might not all come from God, who might inspire man in a different manner, and be pleased with this variety; he therefore thought it indecent and foolish for any man to threaten and terrify another to make him believe what did not appear to him to be true. And supposing that only one religion was really true, and the rest false, he imagined that the native force of truth would at last break forth and shine bright, if supported only by the strength of argument, and attended to with a gentle and unprejudiced mind; while, on the other hand, if such debates were carried on with violence and tumults, as the most wicked are always the most obstinate, so the best and most holy religion might be choked with superstition, as corn is with briars and thorns; he therefore left men wholly to their liberty, that they might be free to believe as they should see cause; only he made a solemn and severe law against such as should so far degenerate from the dignity of human nature, as to think that our souls died with our bodies, or that the world was governed by chance, without a wise overruling Providence: for they all formerly believed that there was a state of rewards and punishments to the good and bad after this life; and they now look on those that think otherwise as scarce fit to be counted men, since they degrade so noble a being as the soul, and reckon it no better than a beast’s: thus they are far from looking on such men as fit for human society, or to be citizens of a well-ordered commonwealth; since a man of such principles must needs, as oft as he dares do it, despise all their laws and customs: for there is no doubt to be made, that a man who is afraid of nothing but the law, and apprehends nothing after death, will not scruple to break through all the laws of his country, either by fraud or force, when by this means he may satisfy his appetites. They never raise any that hold these maxims, either to honours or offices, nor employ them in any public trust, but despise them, as men of base and sordid minds. Yet they do not punish them, because they lay this down as a maxim, that a man cannot make himself believe anything he pleases; nor do they drive any to dissemble their thoughts by threatenings, so that men are not tempted to lie or disguise their opinions; which being a sort of fraud, is abhorred by the Utopians: they take care indeed to prevent their disputing in defence of these opinions, especially before the common people: but they suffer, and even encourage them to dispute concerning them in private with their priest, and other grave men, being confident that they will be cured of those mad opinions by having reason laid before them. There are many among them that run far to the other extreme, though it is neither thought an ill nor unreasonable opinion, and therefore is not at all discouraged. They think that the souls of beasts are immortal, though far inferior to the dignity of the human soul, and not capable of so great a happiness. They are almost all of them very firmly persuaded that good men will be infinitely happy in another state: so that though they are compassionate to all that are sick, yet they lament no man’s death, except they see him loath to part with life; for they look on this as a very ill presage, as if the soul, conscious to itself of guilt, and quite hopeless, was afraid to leave the body, from some secret hints of approaching misery. They think that such a man’s appearance before God cannot be acceptable to Him, who being called on, does not go out cheerfully, but is backward and unwilling, and is as it were dragged to it. They are struck with horror when they see any die in this manner, and carry them out in silence and with sorrow, and praying God that He would be merciful to the errors of the departed soul, they lay the body in the ground: but when any die cheerfully, and full of hope, they do not mourn for them, but sing hymns when they carry out their bodies, and commending their souls very earnestly to God: their whole behaviour is then rather grave than sad, they burn the body, and set up a pillar where the pile was made, with an inscription to the honour of the deceased. When they come from the funeral, they discourse of his good life, and worthy actions, but speak of nothing oftener and with more pleasure than of his serenity at the hour of death. They think such respect paid to the memory of good men is both the greatest incitement to engage others to follow their example, and the most acceptable worship that can be offered them; for they believe that though by the imperfection of human sight they are invisible to us, yet they are present among us, and hear those discourses that pass concerning themselves. They believe it inconsistent with the happiness of departed souls not to be at liberty to be where they will: and do not imagine them capable of the ingratitude of not desiring to see those friends with whom they lived on earth in the strictest bonds of love and kindness: besides, they are persuaded that good men, after death, have these affections; and all other good dispositions increased rather than diminished, and therefore conclude that they are still among the living, and observe all they say or do. From hence they engage in all their affairs with the greater confidence of success, as trusting to their protection; while this opinion of the presence of their ancestors is a restraint that prevents their engaging in ill designs.

This law was created by Utopus to maintain public peace, which he noticed was often disturbed by daily arguments and conflicts, but also because he believed that the well-being of religion itself demanded it. He felt it was unwise to make hasty decisions and doubted whether different forms of religion could all come from God, who might inspire people in various ways and appreciate this diversity. Thus, he thought it was inappropriate and foolish for anyone to threaten or intimidate another into believing something that didn't seem true to them. Even if only one religion was genuinely true and the others false, he believed that the power of truth would ultimately shine through if upheld by solid arguments and approached with an open and unbiased mind. On the contrary, if debates were conducted with violence and chaos, the most virtuous religions could be overwhelmed by superstition, just like crops can be smothered by weeds; therefore, he allowed people the freedom to believe as they saw fit. He only enacted a serious law against those who, in degrading human dignity, believed that our souls die with our bodies or that the world is governed by chance, without a wise and overarching Providence. They previously believed in a system of rewards and punishments for the good and bad after this life and now see those who think otherwise as hardly worthy of being called human since they trivialize something as noble as the soul, treating it as no better than an animal’s. Consequently, they do not regard such individuals as suitable for human society or as citizens of a well-ordered community; after all, someone with such views would inevitably disregard all their laws and customs whenever they felt inclined to do so. It is clear that a person who fears nothing but the law and anticipates nothing after death will not hesitate to break the laws of their country, either through deception or force, when they can fulfill their desires this way. They never promote those who hold these beliefs to honors or positions of authority or trust, viewing them as individuals with base and sordid minds. However, they do not punish them, as they accept the principle that no one can force themselves to believe anything they choose; nor do they coerce anyone into disguising their thoughts through threats, allowing people to avoid the temptation to lie or hide their opinions, as this kind of deception is abhorred by the Utopians. They do take measures to prevent public debates on these opinions, especially in front of the common people, but they encourage private discussions about them with their priests and other respected individuals, confident that these conversations will help dispel the misguided notions. Many among them hold a view considered neither bad nor unreasonable and thus not discouraged: they believe that animal souls are immortal, though far less dignified than human souls and incapable of such great happiness. Almost all of them are firmly convinced that good people will be infinitely happy in another state; therefore, although they feel compassion for the sick, they do not mourn anyone's death unless they perceive reluctance to depart from life, interpreting this as a bad omen, as if the soul, aware of guilt and devoid of hope, feared leaving the body due to some foreknowledge of impending misery. They believe that a person's appearance before God cannot be pleasing if, when called, they do not approach willingly but are hesitant and reluctant, almost dragged to it. They are horrified when they witness someone die in this manner, carrying the body out silently and sorrowfully, praying to God for mercy on the mistakes of the departed soul as they lay the body in the ground. However, when someone dies cheerfully and full of hope, they do not mourn but sing hymns as they carry out the body, earnestly commending the soul to God. Their behavior at such times is grave rather than sad; they burn the body and erect a pillar where the pyre was with an inscription honoring the deceased. After the funeral, they speak of the person's good life and commendable actions, but they most often and joyfully talk about their serenity at the moment of death. They believe that this respect shown for the memories of good people is the best motivation for others to follow their example and the most respectful tribute that can be paid to them. They think that although departed souls may be invisible to us because of the limitations of human perception, they are still present among us and hear the discussions regarding themselves. They don’t think it would be consistent with the happiness of those who have passed to be unable to go wherever they wish and cannot imagine them being ungrateful for not wanting to see those friends they were closest to in life. Moreover, they are convinced that good people, after death, retain and even enhance their feelings of affection and other benevolent traits, leading them to believe they are still among the living and observe everything said or done about them. This belief empowers them in all their endeavors, as they trust in the protection of their ancestors, while the idea of their presence serves as a check against pursuing ill intentions.

“They despise and laugh at auguries, and the other vain and superstitious ways of divination, so much observed among other nations; but have great reverence for such miracles as cannot flow from any of the powers of nature, and look on them as effects and indications of the presence of the Supreme Being, of which they say many instances have occurred among them; and that sometimes their public prayers, which upon great and dangerous occasions they have solemnly put up to God, with assured confidence of being heard, have been answered in a miraculous manner.

They look down on and mock omens and other pointless superstitions used for fortune-telling that are common in other cultures. However, they hold a deep respect for miracles that can't be explained by natural forces, seeing them as signs of the Supreme Being's presence. They claim that many such occurrences have happened among them, and that sometimes their public prayers, which they earnestly offer to God during serious and dangerous situations with full confidence of being heard, have been answered in miraculous ways.

“They think the contemplating God in His works, and the adoring Him for them, is a very acceptable piece of worship to Him.

“They believe that thinking about God through His creations and showing Him admiration for them is a highly valued form of worship.”

“There are many among them that upon a motive of religion neglect learning, and apply themselves to no sort of study; nor do they allow themselves any leisure time, but are perpetually employed, believing that by the good things that a man does he secures to himself that happiness that comes after death. Some of these visit the sick; others mend highways, cleanse ditches, repair bridges, or dig turf, gravel, or stone. Others fell and cleave timber, and bring wood, corn, and other necessaries, on carts, into their towns; nor do these only serve the public, but they serve even private men, more than the slaves themselves do: for if there is anywhere a rough, hard, and sordid piece of work to be done, from which many are frightened by the labour and loathsomeness of it, if not the despair of accomplishing it, they cheerfully, and of their own accord, take that to their share; and by that means, as they ease others very much, so they afflict themselves, and spend their whole life in hard labour: and yet they do not value themselves upon this, nor lessen other people’s credit to raise their own; but by their stooping to such servile employments they are so far from being despised, that they are so much the more esteemed by the whole nation.

Many among them, motivated by religion, neglect education and avoid any kind of study. They don’t allow themselves any free time and are constantly busy, believing that the good deeds they perform will earn them happiness after death. Some of them visit the sick; others repair roads, clean ditches, fix bridges, or dig turf, gravel, or stone. Others cut down and split timber, bringing wood, grain, and other supplies into their towns with carts. Not only do they serve the public, but they also assist private individuals more than slaves do. When there's a tough, unpleasant job that frightens many due to the labor and the unpleasantness of it, if not the hopelessness of completing it, they willingly take it on themselves. In doing so, they greatly relieve others but inflict hardship on themselves, spending their entire lives in hard work. Yet, they do not take pride in this or diminish others' reputations to elevate their own. Instead, by humbling themselves to such menial tasks, they are far from being looked down upon; in fact, they are even more respected by the entire nation.

“Of these there are two sorts: some live unmarried and chaste, and abstain from eating any sort of flesh; and thus weaning themselves from all the pleasures of the present life, which they account hurtful, they pursue, even by the hardest and painfullest methods possible, that blessedness which they hope for hereafter; and the nearer they approach to it, they are the more cheerful and earnest in their endeavours after it. Another sort of them is less willing to put themselves to much toil, and therefore prefer a married state to a single one; and as they do not deny themselves the pleasure of it, so they think the begetting of children is a debt which they owe to human nature, and to their country; nor do they avoid any pleasure that does not hinder labour; and therefore eat flesh so much the more willingly, as they find that by this means they are the more able to work: the Utopians look upon these as the wiser sect, but they esteem the others as the most holy. They would indeed laugh at any man who, from the principles of reason, would prefer an unmarried state to a married, or a life of labour to an easy life: but they reverence and admire such as do it from the motives of religion. There is nothing in which they are more cautious than in giving their opinion positively concerning any sort of religion. The men that lead those severe lives are called in the language of their country Brutheskas, which answers to those we call Religious Orders.

Of these, there are two types: some live unmarried and celibate, avoiding all kinds of meat. By distancing themselves from the pleasures of the present life, which they view as harmful, they strive, often through the hardest and most painful means, for the happiness they hope to achieve in the future. The closer they get to it, the more cheerful and determined they become in their efforts. The other group is less inclined to endure much hardship and therefore prefers being married over staying single. They enjoy the pleasures of marriage and feel that having children is a responsibility they owe to humanity and their country. They don’t shy away from any enjoyment that doesn’t interfere with work, and they willingly eat meat, as they believe it helps them be more productive. The Utopians consider this group wiser, while they regard the first group as the most devout. They would indeed find it amusing if someone chose celibacy over marriage or a life of labor over an easy one, but they respect and admire those who do so for religious reasons. They are very careful about expressing definite opinions on any religion. The men who live such austere lives are called Brutheskas in their language, which corresponds to what we refer to as Religious Orders.

“Their priests are men of eminent piety, and therefore they are but few, for there are only thirteen in every town, one for every temple; but when they go to war, seven of these go out with their forces, and seven others are chosen to supply their room in their absence; but these enter again upon their employments when they return; and those who served in their absence, attend upon the high priest, till vacancies fall by death; for there is one set over the rest. They are chosen by the people as the other magistrates are, by suffrages given in secret, for preventing of factions: and when they are chosen, they are consecrated by the college of priests. The care of all sacred things, the worship of God, and an inspection into the manners of the people, are committed to them. It is a reproach to a man to be sent for by any of them, or for them to speak to him in secret, for that always gives some suspicion: all that is incumbent on them is only to exhort and admonish the people; for the power of correcting and punishing ill men belongs wholly to the Prince, and to the other magistrates: the severest thing that the priest does is the excluding those that are desperately wicked from joining in their worship: there is not any sort of punishment more dreaded by them than this, for as it loads them with infamy, so it fills them with secret horrors, such is their reverence to their religion; nor will their bodies be long exempted from their share of trouble; for if they do not very quickly satisfy the priests of the truth of their repentance, they are seized on by the Senate, and punished for their impiety. The education of youth belongs to the priests, yet they do not take so much care of instructing them in letters, as in forming their minds and manners aright; they use all possible methods to infuse, very early, into the tender and flexible minds of children, such opinions as are both good in themselves and will be useful to their country, for when deep impressions of these things are made at that age, they follow men through the whole course of their lives, and conduce much to preserve the peace of the government, which suffers by nothing more than by vices that rise out of ill opinions. The wives of their priests are the most extraordinary women of the whole country; sometimes the women themselves are made priests, though that falls out but seldom, nor are any but ancient widows chosen into that order.

Their priests are highly devoted individuals, but they are few in number, with only thirteen in each town, one for every temple. When they go to war, seven of them fight alongside the forces, while seven others are selected to take their place during their absence. When the priests return, they resume their duties, and those who filled in for them assist the high priest until there are vacancies due to death, as one priest oversees the others. They are elected by the people just like other officials, through secret ballots to avoid factions. Once selected, they are consecrated by the priesthood. They are responsible for all sacred matters, the worship of God, and monitoring the behavior of the people. It is considered shameful for a man to be summoned by any of them or for them to speak to him privately, as this raises suspicion. Their primary role is to encourage and advise the people, while the authority to correct and punish wrongdoers lies solely with the Prince and other officials. The most severe action a priest can take is to banish those who are irredeemably wicked from participating in worship, which is the punishment they fear the most, as it brings them disgrace and deep distress due to their reverence for their faith. They won’t remain free from trouble for long; if those banned do not quickly prove their repentance to the priests, the Senate will intervene and punish them for their wrongdoing. The education of youth falls to the priests, but while they may not focus heavily on teaching them to read and write, they prioritize shaping their character and conduct. They strive to instill good values and ideas in children’s young and adaptable minds from an early age, which will benefit both themselves and their country. When these lessons take root early on, they can influence individuals throughout their lives and significantly support governmental stability, which is most vulnerable to vices stemming from misguided beliefs. The wives of their priests are the most remarkable women in the country; occasionally, women themselves become priests, though this is rare, and typically only elderly widows are selected for this role.

“None of the magistrates have greater honour paid them than is paid the priests; and if they should happen to commit any crime, they would not be questioned for it; their punishment is left to God, and to their own consciences; for they do not think it lawful to lay hands on any man, how wicked soever he is, that has been in a peculiar manner dedicated to God; nor do they find any great inconvenience in this, both because they have so few priests, and because these are chosen with much caution, so that it must be a very unusual thing to find one who, merely out of regard to his virtue, and for his being esteemed a singularly good man, was raised up to so great a dignity, degenerate into corruption and vice; and if such a thing should fall out, for man is a changeable creature, yet, there being few priests, and these having no authority but what rises out of the respect that is paid them, nothing of great consequence to the public can proceed from the indemnity that the priests enjoy.

“None of the magistrates receive more honor than the priests do; and if they ever commit a crime, they won't be questioned about it. Their punishment is left to God and their own consciences, because they don't believe it's right to lay hands on anyone, no matter how wicked they might be, who has been specifically dedicated to God. They also don’t see much problem with this, partly because there are so few priests and because these priests are chosen very carefully. So, it’s quite rare to find one, simply for their virtue and being seen as a genuinely good person, elevated to such a high position who then falls into corruption and vice. And if that were to happen, since human nature can change, the fact that there are few priests, and they hold no authority other than the respect they command, means that not much of consequence to the public can come from the immunity that the priests have.”

“They have, indeed, very few of them, lest greater numbers sharing in the same honour might make the dignity of that order, which they esteem so highly, to sink in its reputation; they also think it difficult to find out many of such an exalted pitch of goodness as to be equal to that dignity, which demands the exercise of more than ordinary virtues. Nor are the priests in greater veneration among them than they are among their neighbouring nations, as you may imagine by that which I think gives occasion for it.

“They have, in fact, very few of them, so that having more people sharing in the same honor wouldn't diminish the status of that order, which they value so highly. They also find it hard to identify many individuals with such exceptional goodness who can live up to that dignity, which requires the display of above-average virtues. Moreover, the priests hold no greater respect among them than they do among neighboring nations, as you might guess from what I believe causes this.”

“When the Utopians engage in battle, the priests who accompany them to the war, apparelled in their sacred vestments, kneel down during the action (in a place not far from the field), and, lifting up their hands to heaven, pray, first for peace, and then for victory to their own side, and particularly that it may be gained without the effusion of much blood on either side; and when the victory turns to their side, they run in among their own men to restrain their fury; and if any of their enemies see them or call to them, they are preserved by that means; and such as can come so near them as to touch their garments have not only their lives, but their fortunes secured to them; it is upon this account that all the nations round about consider them so much, and treat them with such reverence, that they have been often no less able to preserve their own people from the fury of their enemies than to save their enemies from their rage; for it has sometimes fallen out, that when their armies have been in disorder and forced to fly, so that their enemies were running upon the slaughter and spoil, the priests by interposing have separated them from one another, and stopped the effusion of more blood; so that, by their mediation, a peace has been concluded on very reasonable terms; nor is there any nation about them so fierce, cruel, or barbarous, as not to look upon their persons as sacred and inviolable.

“When the Utopians go into battle, the priests who accompany them, dressed in their sacred robes, kneel down nearby during the fight and lift their hands to heaven, praying first for peace and then for victory for their side, especially that it can be achieved without a lot of bloodshed on either side. When victory is achieved, they rush in among their troops to calm their anger. If any enemies see them or call out to them, they are protected by that action; those who can get close enough to touch their garments not only secure their lives but also their fortunes. This is why all the neighboring nations respect them so much and treat them with reverence; they have often been just as capable of saving their own people from their enemies’ wrath as they have been of saving their enemies from their anger. There have been times when their armies have been in chaos and forced to retreat, with enemies charging in for slaughter and plunder. The priests have managed to intercede and separate the two sides, preventing further bloodshed, allowing for peace to be made on reasonable terms. No nation around them, however fierce, cruel, or barbaric, fails to regard their persons as sacred and untouchable.”

“The first and the last day of the month, and of the year, is a festival; they measure their months by the course of the moon, and their years by the course of the sun: the first days are called in their language the Cynemernes, and the last the Trapemernes, which answers in our language, to the festival that begins or ends the season.

“The first and last day of the month, and of the year, is a celebration; they track their months by the movement of the moon and their years by the movement of the sun: the first days are called Cynemernes in their language, and the last days are known as Trapemernes, which translates in our language to the festival that starts or ends the season."

“They have magnificent temples, that are not only nobly built, but extremely spacious, which is the more necessary as they have so few of them; they are a little dark within, which proceeds not from any error in the architecture, but is done with design; for their priests think that too much light dissipates the thoughts, and that a more moderate degree of it both recollects the mind and raises devotion. Though there are many different forms of religion among them, yet all these, how various soever, agree in the main point, which is the worshipping the Divine Essence; and, therefore, there is nothing to be seen or heard in their temples in which the several persuasions among them may not agree; for every sect performs those rites that are peculiar to it in their private houses, nor is there anything in the public worship that contradicts the particular ways of those different sects. There are no images for God in their temples, so that every one may represent Him to his thoughts according to the way of his religion; nor do they call this one God by any other name but that of Mithras, which is the common name by which they all express the Divine Essence, whatsoever otherwise they think it to be; nor are there any prayers among them but such as every one of them may use without prejudice to his own opinion.

They have amazing temples that are not only beautifully constructed but also quite spacious, which is especially important since they have so few of them. The interiors are a bit dark, but that’s intentional; their priests believe that too much light distracts the mind and that a moderate amount of light helps focus thoughts and enhances devotion. Although there are many different religions among them, they all agree on the main point, which is worshipping the Divine Essence. Therefore, there’s nothing seen or heard in their temples that contradicts the various beliefs; each sect carries out its unique rituals in private homes, and the public worship doesn’t conflict with the practices of different sects. There are no images of God in their temples, allowing everyone to envision Him according to their beliefs. They all refer to this one God as Mithras, which is the shared name they use to express the Divine Essence, regardless of their individual interpretations. Moreover, there are no prayers among them except for those that everyone can use without conflicting with their own beliefs.

“They meet in their temples on the evening of the festival that concludes a season, and not having yet broke their fast, they thank God for their good success during that year or month which is then at an end; and the next day, being that which begins the new season, they meet early in their temples, to pray for the happy progress of all their affairs during that period upon which they then enter. In the festival which concludes the period, before they go to the temple, both wives and children fall on their knees before their husbands or parents and confess everything in which they have either erred or failed in their duty, and beg pardon for it. Thus all little discontents in families are removed, that they may offer up their devotions with a pure and serene mind; for they hold it a great impiety to enter upon them with disturbed thoughts, or with a consciousness of their bearing hatred or anger in their hearts to any person whatsoever; and think that they should become liable to severe punishments if they presumed to offer sacrifices without cleansing their hearts, and reconciling all their differences. In the temples the two sexes are separated, the men go to the right hand, and the women to the left; and the males and females all place themselves before the head and master or mistress of the family to which they belong, so that those who have the government of them at home may see their deportment in public. And they intermingle them so, that the younger and the older may be set by one another; for if the younger sort were all set together, they would, perhaps, trifle away that time too much in which they ought to beget in themselves that religious dread of the Supreme Being which is the greatest and almost the only incitement to virtue.

They gather in their temples on the evening of the festival that marks the end of a season, and since they haven’t broken their fast yet, they thank God for their good fortune during the year or month that is now concluding. The next day, which kicks off the new season, they meet early in their temples to pray for a successful progression of all their affairs in the upcoming period. During the festival that wraps up the period, before heading to the temple, both wives and children kneel before their husbands or parents and confess everything they've done wrong or where they feel they’ve fallen short in their responsibilities, seeking forgiveness. This way, any minor disagreements within families are resolved, allowing them to offer their prayers with a clear and peaceful mind; for they believe it’s a serious offense to engage in worship with troubled thoughts or harboring hatred or anger in their hearts towards anyone. They think they would face severe consequences if they dared to make sacrifices without first purifying their hearts and settling their disputes. In the temples, men and women are separated, with the men on one side and the women on the other; everyone positions themselves in front of the head of the family they belong to so that those who govern them at home can observe their behavior in public. They mix the younger and older members together so that if the younger ones were grouped all together, they wouldn’t waste that time which should instill in them a respectful fear of the Supreme Being, which is the greatest—and almost the only—motivation for virtue.

“They offer up no living creature in sacrifice, nor do they think it suitable to the Divine Being, from whose bounty it is that these creatures have derived their lives, to take pleasure in their deaths, or the offering up their blood. They burn incense and other sweet odours, and have a great number of wax lights during their worship, not out of any imagination that such oblations can add anything to the divine nature (which even prayers cannot do), but as it is a harmless and pure way of worshipping God; so they think those sweet savours and lights, together with some other ceremonies, by a secret and unaccountable virtue, elevate men’s souls, and inflame them with greater energy and cheerfulness during the divine worship.

“They don’t offer any living creature as a sacrifice, nor do they believe it’s fitting for the Divine Being, from whom these creatures have received their lives, to take pleasure in their deaths or the shedding of their blood. They burn incense and other pleasant scents, and they have many wax candles during their worship, not because they think such offerings can add anything to the divine nature (which even prayers cannot), but because it’s a harmless and pure way to worship God. They believe that these sweet fragrances and lights, along with some other rituals, have a mysterious and inexplicable power that lifts people’s spirits and energizes them during divine worship."

“All the people appear in the temples in white garments; but the priest’s vestments are parti-coloured, and both the work and colours are wonderful. They are made of no rich materials, for they are neither embroidered nor set with precious stones; but are composed of the plumes of several birds, laid together with so much art, and so neatly, that the true value of them is far beyond the costliest materials. They say, that in the ordering and placing those plumes some dark mysteries are represented, which pass down among their priests in a secret tradition concerning them; and that they are as hieroglyphics, putting them in mind of the blessing that they have received from God, and of their duties, both to Him and to their neighbours. As soon as the priest appears in those ornaments, they all fall prostrate on the ground, with so much reverence and so deep a silence, that such as look on cannot but be struck with it, as if it were the effect of the appearance of a deity. After they have been for some time in this posture, they all stand up, upon a sign given by the priest, and sing hymns to the honour of God, some musical instruments playing all the while. These are quite of another form than those used among us; but, as many of them are much sweeter than ours, so others are made use of by us. Yet in one thing they very much exceed us: all their music, both vocal and instrumental, is adapted to imitate and express the passions, and is so happily suited to every occasion, that, whether the subject of the hymn be cheerful, or formed to soothe or trouble the mind, or to express grief or remorse, the music takes the impression of whatever is represented, affects and kindles the passions, and works the sentiments deep into the hearts of the hearers. When this is done, both priests and people offer up very solemn prayers to God in a set form of words; and these are so composed, that whatsoever is pronounced by the whole assembly may be likewise applied by every man in particular to his own condition. In these they acknowledge God to be the author and governor of the world, and the fountain of all the good they receive, and therefore offer up to him their thanksgiving; and, in particular, bless him for His goodness in ordering it so, that they are born under the happiest government in the world, and are of a religion which they hope is the truest of all others; but, if they are mistaken, and if there is either a better government, or a religion more acceptable to God, they implore His goodness to let them know it, vowing that they resolve to follow him whithersoever he leads them; but if their government is the best, and their religion the truest, then they pray that He may fortify them in it, and bring all the world both to the same rules of life, and to the same opinions concerning Himself, unless, according to the unsearchableness of His mind, He is pleased with a variety of religions. Then they pray that God may give them an easy passage at last to Himself, not presuming to set limits to Him, how early or late it should be; but, if it may be wished for without derogating from His supreme authority, they desire to be quickly delivered, and to be taken to Himself, though by the most terrible kind of death, rather than to be detained long from seeing Him by the most prosperous course of life. When this prayer is ended, they all fall down again upon the ground; and, after a little while, they rise up, go home to dinner, and spend the rest of the day in diversion or military exercises.

“All the people show up at the temples dressed in white clothing; however, the priest’s attire is colorful, and both the craftsmanship and colors are impressive. They aren’t made from any luxurious materials, as they are neither embroidered nor adorned with gems; instead, they are crafted from the feathers of various birds, arranged so skillfully and neatly that their true value far exceeds that of the most expensive materials. It is said that the arrangement and placement of these feathers represent some dark mysteries that are passed down among their priests through a secret tradition; these act like hieroglyphics, reminding them of the blessing they have received from God and their duties to both Him and their neighbors. When the priest appears in these garments, everyone falls prostrate on the ground with such reverence and deep silence that onlookers can’t help but be moved, as if witnessing a deity. After a while in this position, they all stand at a signal from the priest and sing hymns to honor God, accompanied by music throughout. The instruments they use are quite different from ours; some are much sweeter, while others we already use ourselves. However, they excel in one aspect: all their music, both vocal and instrumental, is designed to imitate and express emotions. It is so well-suited for every occasion that, whether the subject of the hymn is cheerful, meant to soothe or provoke thought, or to convey grief or regret, the music captures the essence of whatever is being expressed, stirs the emotions, and deeply resonates with the listeners’ hearts. After this, both the priests and the congregation offer solemn prayers to God using a set form of words, crafted so that what the whole assembly pronounces can also apply to each individual. In these prayers, they acknowledge God as the creator and ruler of the world and the source of all the good they have, and they offer their thanks to Him; they specifically bless Him for His kindness in allowing them to live under the best government in the world and to practice what they hope is the truest religion. However, if they are mistaken and if there is a better government or a religion that is more pleasing to God, they ask for His kindness to reveal it to them, vowing to follow Him wherever He leads. If their government is indeed the best and their religion the truest, they pray for Him to strengthen them in it and lead the whole world to follow the same rules of life and share the same beliefs about Him, unless, according to the unfathomable nature of His mind, He delights in a variety of religions. Then they pray that God will guide them to Himself in due time, without presuming to limit Him on how early or late that should be; however, if it can be asked without diminishing His ultimate authority, they wish to be taken to Him quickly, even if it means enduring a terrible death, rather than to be long delayed from seeing Him by the most prosperous life. Once this prayer concludes, they all fall back down to the ground; after a little while, they get up, go home for dinner, and spend the rest of the day either enjoying leisure or engaging in military exercises.”

“Thus have I described to you, as particularly as I could, the Constitution of that commonwealth, which I do not only think the best in the world, but indeed the only commonwealth that truly deserves that name. In all other places it is visible that, while people talk of a commonwealth, every man only seeks his own wealth; but there, where no man has any property, all men zealously pursue the good of the public, and, indeed, it is no wonder to see men act so differently, for in other commonwealths every man knows that, unless he provides for himself, how flourishing soever the commonwealth may be, he must die of hunger, so that he sees the necessity of preferring his own concerns to the public; but in Utopia, where every man has a right to everything, they all know that if care is taken to keep the public stores full no private man can want anything; for among them there is no unequal distribution, so that no man is poor, none in necessity, and though no man has anything, yet they are all rich; for what can make a man so rich as to lead a serene and cheerful life, free from anxieties; neither apprehending want himself, nor vexed with the endless complaints of his wife? He is not afraid of the misery of his children, nor is he contriving how to raise a portion for his daughters; but is secure in this, that both he and his wife, his children and grand-children, to as many generations as he can fancy, will all live both plentifully and happily; since, among them, there is no less care taken of those who were once engaged in labour, but grow afterwards unable to follow it, than there is, elsewhere, of these that continue still employed. I would gladly hear any man compare the justice that is among them with that of all other nations; among whom, may I perish, if I see anything that looks either like justice or equity; for what justice is there in this: that a nobleman, a goldsmith, a banker, or any other man, that either does nothing at all, or, at best, is employed in things that are of no use to the public, should live in great luxury and splendour upon what is so ill acquired, and a mean man, a carter, a smith, or a ploughman, that works harder even than the beasts themselves, and is employed in labours so necessary, that no commonwealth could hold out a year without them, can only earn so poor a livelihood and must lead so miserable a life, that the condition of the beasts is much better than theirs? For as the beasts do not work so constantly, so they feed almost as well, and with more pleasure, and have no anxiety about what is to come, whilst these men are depressed by a barren and fruitless employment, and tormented with the apprehensions of want in their old age; since that which they get by their daily labour does but maintain them at present, and is consumed as fast as it comes in, there is no overplus left to lay up for old age.

I've described to you, as clearly as I could, the structure of that society, which I believe is the best in the world and truly deserves the name of a commonwealth. In all other places, it’s clear that while people talk about a commonwealth, each person only looks out for their own wealth. But in Utopia, where no one owns property, everyone works for the public good. It’s not surprising to see people act differently because in other societies, every person knows that unless they provide for themselves, no matter how prosperous the commonwealth may be, they will starve. That’s why they feel the need to prioritize their own interests over the community’s. However, in Utopia, where everyone has the right to everything, they understand that if the public stores are kept full, no individual will go without. There's no unequal distribution, so no one is poor or in need; even though no one owns anything, they're all rich. After all, what makes a person rich is living a peaceful and happy life, free from worries—neither fearing for their own needs nor suffering from constant complaints from their partner. They aren’t troubled by the plight of their children or worried about how to provide dowries for their daughters, secure in the knowledge that they, their wives, their children, and their grandchildren, for as many generations as they can imagine, will live abundantly and joyfully. Additionally, they care for those who have worked but can no longer do so just as well as they care for the currently employed. I would love to hear anyone compare the justice found among them with that of any other nation; among which, I swear, I see nothing resembling justice or fairness. What kind of justice is it that a nobleman, a goldsmith, a banker, or anyone else who either does nothing or is engaged in activities that are not beneficial to the public can live in luxury from ill-gotten gains, while a worker, a carter, a smith, or a farmer, who works harder than the animals themselves, and whose labor is so essential that no commonwealth could survive for a year without it, can barely scrape by and leads a miserable life? The condition of these workers is even worse than that of animals. At least the animals don't work as tirelessly, yet they eat well, with more enjoyment, and don’t worry about the future. Meanwhile, these people are weighed down by fruitless work and anxiety about what the future holds, since what they earn through their daily labor only keeps them afloat in the moment and is spent as quickly as it comes in, leaving nothing saved for old age.

“Is not that government both unjust and ungrateful, that is so prodigal of its favours to those that are called gentlemen, or goldsmiths, or such others who are idle, or live either by flattery or by contriving the arts of vain pleasure, and, on the other hand, takes no care of those of a meaner sort, such as ploughmen, colliers, and smiths, without whom it could not subsist? But after the public has reaped all the advantage of their service, and they come to be oppressed with age, sickness, and want, all their labours and the good they have done is forgotten, and all the recompense given them is that they are left to die in great misery. The richer sort are often endeavouring to bring the hire of labourers lower, not only by their fraudulent practices, but by the laws which they procure to be made to that effect, so that though it is a thing most unjust in itself to give such small rewards to those who deserve so well of the public, yet they have given those hardships the name and colour of justice, by procuring laws to be made for regulating them.

Isn’t that government both unfair and ungrateful, being so generous with its favors to those called gentlemen, goldsmiths, or other idlers who thrive on flattery or the pursuit of shallow pleasures, while ignoring those of lower status, like farmers, coal miners, and blacksmiths, without whom it couldn’t survive? Yet after the public has gained all the benefits from their work, when they become burdened by age, illness, and need, all their efforts and the good they’ve done are forgotten, and the only reward they receive is being left to suffer in great misery. The wealthy often try to drive down laborers' wages, not just through deceitful tactics but also through laws they get created for that purpose, so even though it’s clearly unjust to offer such meager rewards to those who contribute so much to society, they have dressed those hardships in the guise of justice by having laws made to regulate them.

“Therefore I must say that, as I hope for mercy, I can have no other notion of all the other governments that I see or know, than that they are a conspiracy of the rich, who, on pretence of managing the public, only pursue their private ends, and devise all the ways and arts they can find out; first, that they may, without danger, preserve all that they have so ill-acquired, and then, that they may engage the poor to toil and labour for them at as low rates as possible, and oppress them as much as they please; and if they can but prevail to get these contrivances established by the show of public authority, which is considered as the representative of the whole people, then they are accounted laws; yet these wicked men, after they have, by a most insatiable covetousness, divided that among themselves with which all the rest might have been well supplied, are far from that happiness that is enjoyed among the Utopians; for the use as well as the desire of money being extinguished, much anxiety and great occasions of mischief is cut off with it, and who does not see that the frauds, thefts, robberies, quarrels, tumults, contentions, seditions, murders, treacheries, and witchcrafts, which are, indeed, rather punished than restrained by the severities of law, would all fall off, if money were not any more valued by the world? Men’s fears, solicitudes, cares, labours, and watchings would all perish in the same moment with the value of money; even poverty itself, for the relief of which money seems most necessary, would fall. But, in order to the apprehending this aright, take one instance:—

“Therefore, I must say that, as I hope for mercy, I can't view any of the other governments I see or know as anything but a conspiracy of the wealthy. They pretend to manage public affairs but are really just pursuing their own interests. They come up with all sorts of methods to ensure they can safely keep what they've gained unfairly and to get the poor to work for them at the lowest wages possible, while oppressing them as much as they want. And if they can manage to get these schemes formalized under the guise of public authority, which is seen as representing all the people, then they are considered laws. Yet these wicked individuals, after their insatiable greed has led them to hoard resources that could have benefitted everyone, are far from the happiness enjoyed by the Utopians. In Utopia, both the desire for and the use of money are eliminated, which cuts down on a lot of anxiety and potential for harm. Who doesn’t see that the frauds, thefts, robberies, fights, riots, disputes, uprisings, murders, betrayals, and even witchcraft—things that are often punished but not truly prevented by strict laws—would all disappear if money were no longer valued in society? People's fears, worries, cares, labor, and sleepless nights would vanish once the value of money is gone; even poverty itself, for which money seems most necessary, would fade away. But to grasp this correctly, consider one example:—”

“Consider any year, that has been so unfruitful that many thousands have died of hunger; and yet if, at the end of that year, a survey was made of the granaries of all the rich men that have hoarded up the corn, it would be found that there was enough among them to have prevented all that consumption of men that perished in misery; and that, if it had been distributed among them, none would have felt the terrible effects of that scarcity: so easy a thing would it be to supply all the necessities of life, if that blessed thing called money, which is pretended to be invented for procuring them was not really the only thing that obstructed their being procured!

“Think about any year that was so unproductive that thousands of people died from starvation; and yet, if you looked at the granaries of all the wealthy individuals who had stockpiled grain at the end of that year, you would find there was enough stored to have prevented the suffering and death of those people. If it had been shared among everyone, no one would have experienced the devastating effects of that scarcity. It would be so easy to provide for all the basic needs of life if it weren't for that blessed thing called money, which is supposed to help us get those needs but is actually the main thing standing in the way of making them available!”

“I do not doubt but rich men are sensible of this, and that they well know how much a greater happiness it is to want nothing necessary, than to abound in many superfluities; and to be rescued out of so much misery, than to abound with so much wealth: and I cannot think but the sense of every man’s interest, added to the authority of Christ’s commands, who, as He was infinitely wise, knew what was best, and was not less good in discovering it to us, would have drawn all the world over to the laws of the Utopians, if pride, that plague of human nature, that source of so much misery, did not hinder it; for this vice does not measure happiness so much by its own conveniences, as by the miseries of others; and would not be satisfied with being thought a goddess, if none were left that were miserable, over whom she might insult. Pride thinks its own happiness shines the brighter, by comparing it with the misfortunes of other persons; that by displaying its own wealth they may feel their poverty the more sensibly. This is that infernal serpent that creeps into the breasts of mortals, and possesses them too much to be easily drawn out; and, therefore, I am glad that the Utopians have fallen upon this form of government, in which I wish that all the world could be so wise as to imitate them; for they have, indeed, laid down such a scheme and foundation of policy, that as men live happily under it, so it is like to be of great continuance; for they having rooted out of the minds of their people all the seeds, both of ambition and faction, there is no danger of any commotions at home; which alone has been the ruin of many states that seemed otherwise to be well secured; but as long as they live in peace at home, and are governed by such good laws, the envy of all their neighbouring princes, who have often, though in vain, attempted their ruin, will never be able to put their state into any commotion or disorder.”

“I have no doubt that wealthy people are aware of this, and they know how much happier it is to lack nothing necessary than to have an excess of unnecessary things; and to be freed from so much suffering is better than to have a lot of wealth. I believe that every person’s interests, combined with the authority of Christ’s teachings, who was infinitely wise and knew what was best for us, would have drawn everyone to the laws of Utopia if it weren't for pride, that plague of human nature that causes so much misery. This vice doesn't gauge happiness by its own comfort but rather by the suffering of others; it wouldn't be satisfied with being considered god-like if there were no one left to look down upon. Pride thinks its own happiness shines brighter when compared to the misfortunes of others, believing that by showcasing its own wealth, it makes others feel their poverty even more. This is the infernal serpent that sneaks into people's hearts and takes hold too tightly to be easily removed; therefore, I am pleased that the Utopians have adopted this form of government, which I wish all the world could wisely follow. They have indeed established such a plan and foundation for their society that it enables people to live happily under it, and it’s likely to last a long time. They have rooted out all seeds of ambition and faction from their people’s minds, eliminating the danger of internal conflicts, which alone has led to the downfall of many states that seemed otherwise secure. As long as they live in peace at home and are governed by such good laws, the envy of all their neighboring rulers, who have often tried in vain to destroy them, will never be able to disrupt their state.”

When Raphael had thus made an end of speaking, though many things occurred to me, both concerning the manners and laws of that people, that seemed very absurd, as well in their way of making war, as in their notions of religion and divine matters—together with several other particulars, but chiefly what seemed the foundation of all the rest, their living in common, without the use of money, by which all nobility, magnificence, splendour, and majesty, which, according to the common opinion, are the true ornaments of a nation, would be quite taken away—yet since I perceived that Raphael was weary, and was not sure whether he could easily bear contradiction, remembering that he had taken notice of some, who seemed to think they were bound in honour to support the credit of their own wisdom, by finding out something to censure in all other men’s inventions, besides their own, I only commended their Constitution, and the account he had given of it in general; and so, taking him by the hand, carried him to supper, and told him I would find out some other time for examining this subject more particularly, and for discoursing more copiously upon it. And, indeed, I shall be glad to embrace an opportunity of doing it. In the meanwhile, though it must be confessed that he is both a very learned man and a person who has obtained a great knowledge of the world, I cannot perfectly agree to everything he has related. However, there are many things in the commonwealth of Utopia that I rather wish, than hope, to see followed in our governments.

When Raphael finished speaking, a lot of thoughts came to me about the customs and laws of that society, which seemed quite absurd, both in how they conducted wars and their beliefs about religion and the divine—along with various other details, but mostly their communal living without money. This setup eliminated all nobility, grandeur, and the prestige that people generally consider essential to a nation. Still, I noticed that Raphael was tired and might not handle disagreement well. I recalled that he had observed some individuals who felt it was their duty to uphold their own wisdom by criticizing the ideas of others. So, I simply praised their Constitution and the overview he had given. I then took his hand and led him to dinner, telling him that I would find another time to discuss this topic in more depth. And honestly, I’d be happy to take that opportunity. In the meantime, while I must admit he is a very knowledgeable person with a deep understanding of the world, I can’t fully agree with everything he shared. However, there are many aspects of Utopia’s system that I wish, rather than hope, we could see adopted in our governments.


Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!