This is a modern-English version of The Mathematicall Praeface to Elements of Geometrie of Euclid of Megara, originally written by Dee, John. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.

The variation in text sizes is as in the original.

The variation in text sizes is as in the original.

In the printed book, all sidenotes were shown in the outer margin. For this e-text, they have been divided. Text sidenotes—including single numerals—are in the right margin; symbols are on the left, along with page numbers. The continuous quotation marks could not be reproduced, so they are shown as oversized open quotes “ and close quotes ” in the left margin.

In the printed book, all sidenotes were shown in the outer margin. For this e-text, they have been divided. Text sidenotes—including single numbers—are in the right margin; symbols are on the left, along with page numbers. The continuous quotation marks could not be reproduced, so they are shown as oversized open quotes “ and close quotes ” in the left margin.

The original book did not have numbered pages. Instead it labeled all recto (right-side) pages, grouped into six eight-page signatures. The signatures themselves have an unusual sequence: pointer (pointing finger); * (asterisk); a; b; c; A. The verso (left-side) pages were unmarked; they are identified here as ||. The final page was an unnumbered foldout, about twice the size of a normal page.

The original book didn't have numbered pages. Instead, it labeled all the right-side pages, organized into six eight-page signatures. The signatures had an unusual order: pointer (pointing finger); * (asterisk); a; b; c; A. The left-side pages were unmarked; they're identified here as ||. The final page was an unnumbered foldout, roughly twice the size of a standard page.

Unless otherwise noted, spelling and punctuation are unchanged. A few specific notes are given at the end of the text, along with those passages of Euclid identified by number.

Unless otherwise noted, spelling and punctuation are unchanged. A few specific notes are given at the end of the text, along with those passages of Euclid identified by number.

 


pointer.ii
The Translator to the Reader.

T(There) Here is (gentle Reader) nothing (the word of God onely set apart) which so much beautifieth and adorneth the soule and minde of mã, as doth the knowledge of good artes and sciences: as the knowledge of naturall and morall Philosophie. The one setteth before our eyes, the creatures of God, both in the heauens aboue, and in the earth beneath: in which as in a glasse, we beholde the exceding maiestie and wisedome of God, in adorning and beautifying them as we see: in geuing vnto them such wonderfull and manifolde proprieties, and naturall workinges, and that so diuersly and in such varietie: farther in maintaining and conseruing them continually, whereby to praise and adore him, as by S. Paule we are taught. The other teacheth vs rules and preceptes of vertue, how, in common life amongest men, we ought to walke vprightly: what dueties pertaine to our selues, what pertaine to the gouernment or good order both of an housholde, and also of a citie or common wealth. The reading likewise of histories, conduceth not a litle, to the adorning of the soule & minde of man, a studie of all men cõmended: by it are seene and knowen the artes and doinges of infinite wise men gone before vs. In histories are contained infinite examples of heroicall vertues to be of vs followed, and horrible examples of vices to be of vs eschewed. Many other artes also there are which beautifie the minde of man: but of all other none do more garnishe & beautifie it, then those artes which are called Mathematicall. Unto the knowledge of which no man can attaine, without the perfecte knowledge and instruction of the principles, groundes, and Elementes of Geometrie. But perfectly || to be instructed in them, requireth diligent studie and reading of olde auncient authors. Amongest which, none for a beginner is to be preferred before the most auncient Philosopher Euclide of Megara. For of all others he hath in a true methode and iuste order, gathered together whatsoeuer any before him had of these Elementes written: inuenting also and adding many thinges of his owne: wherby he hath in due forme accomplished the arte: first geuing definitions, principles, & groundes, wherof he deduceth his Propositions or conclusions, in such wonderfull wise, that that which goeth before, is of necessitie required to the proufe of that which followeth. So that without the diligent studie of Euclides Elementes, it is impossible to attaine vnto the perfecte knowledge of Geometrie, and consequently of any of the other Mathematicall sciences. Wherefore considering the want & lacke of such good authors hitherto in our Englishe tounge, lamenting also the negligence, and lacke of zeale to their countrey in those of our nation, to whom God hath geuen both knowledge, & also abilitie to translate into our tounge, and to publishe abroad such good authors, and bookes (the chiefe instrumentes of all learninges): seing moreouer that many good wittes both of gentlemen and of others of all degrees, much desirous and studious of these artes, and seeking for them as much as they can, sparing no paines, and yet frustrate of their intent, by no meanes attaining to that which they seeke: I haue for their sakes, with some charge & great trauaile, faithfully translated into our vulgare toũge, & set abroad in Print, this booke of Euclide. Whereunto I haue added easie and plaine declarations and examples by figures, of the definitions. In which booke also ye shall in due place finde manifolde additions, Scholies, Annotations, and Inuentions: which I haue gathered out of many of the most famous & chiefe Mathematiciẽs, both of old time, and in our age: as by diligent reading it in course, ye shall pointer.iij well perceaue. The fruite and gaine which I require for these my paines and trauaile, shall be nothing els, but onely that thou gentle reader, will gratefully accept the same: and that thou mayest thereby receaue some profite: and moreouer to excite and stirre vp others learned, to do the like, & to take paines in that behalfe. By meanes wherof, our Englishe tounge shall no lesse be enriched with good Authors, then are other straunge tounges: as the Dutch, French, Italian, and Spanishe: in which are red all good authors in a maner, found amongest the Grekes or Latines. Which is the chiefest cause, that amongest thẽ do florishe so many cunning and skilfull men, in the inuentions of straunge and wonderfull thinges, as in these our daies we see there do. Which fruite and gaine if I attaine vnto, it shall encourage me hereafter, in such like sort to translate, and set abroad some other good authors, both pertaining to religion (as partly I haue already done)
and also pertaining to the Mathematicall Artes.
Thus gentle reader farewell.

T(There) Dear Reader, there is nothing that enhances and beautifies a person's soul and mind like the knowledge of good arts and sciences, particularly the understanding of natural and moral philosophy. The former shows us God’s creations, both in the heavens above and on the earth below: in which, like a mirror, we see the incredible majesty and wisdom of God in adorning and beautifying them as we observe: by giving them such wonderful and diverse properties and natural workings. Furthermore, he maintains and preserves them continually, allowing us to praise and adore Him, as taught by St. Paul. The latter teaches us the rules and principles of virtue, guiding us on how to live uprightly among people in everyday life: what duties pertain to ourselves, and what relate to the governance or good order of both a household and a city or commonwealth. Additionally, reading histories significantly contributes to enriching the soul and mind of man, a pursuit encouraged for all. Through history, we can see and learn about the arts and actions of countless wise individuals who came before us. Histories contain countless examples of heroic virtues for us to emulate, as well as horrific examples of vices for us to avoid. There are many other arts that beautify the mind, but none do so more than the arts called mathematical. Attaining knowledge of these requires a thorough understanding of the principles, foundations, and elements of geometry. However, being perfectly instructed in them requires diligent study and reading of ancient authors. Among them, none is more suited for beginners than the most ancient philosopher Euclid of Megara. He has, in true method and just order, compiled everything that others had previously written about these elements: also inventing and adding many of his own contributions, helping to properly complete the art: first providing definitions, principles, and foundations, from which he deduces his propositions or conclusions in such a remarkable way that what comes before is necessary for proving what follows. Thus, without diligent study of Euclid's elements, it's impossible to achieve perfect knowledge of geometry, and consequently, of any other mathematical sciences. Therefore, given the lack of good authors in our English language, lamenting the negligence and absence of zeal among our nation’s people who have been given both knowledge and the ability to translate into our language and publish such esteemed authors and books (the primary instruments of all learning): noticing, moreover, that many bright minds, both gentlemen and others of all ranks, are eager and studious of these arts, seeking them tirelessly but still failing to achieve what they seek, I have, for their sake, at some expense and through great effort, faithfully translated into our common tongue and published this book of Euclid in print. To it, I have added simple and clear explanations and examples through figures of the definitions. In this book, you will also find multiple additions, comments, annotations, and inventions that I have gathered from many of the most renowned mathematicians, both ancient and modern: as you will clearly perceive through careful reading. The reward and gain I seek for my efforts will be nothing more than that you, dear reader, will graciously accept this, so that you may gain some benefit, and also to inspire and encourage other learned individuals to do the same and to put in effort in that regard. Through this, our English language will be no less enriched with good authors than other foreign languages: like Dutch, French, Italian, and Spanish, which contain nearly all good authors found among the Greeks or Latins. This is the primary reason why so many skilled and talented individuals flourish among them in the inventions of strange and wonderful things, as we see in our day. If I achieve this reward and gain, it will motivate me further to translate and publish other good authors, both relating to religion (as I have partly already done)
and also pertaining to the mathematical arts.
So, dear reader, farewell.

(?¿)

(?¿)


[pointer.iiij]
No text provided to modernize. TO THE UNFAILING LOVERS
of truth, and devoted Students of Noble
Sciences, JOHN DEE of London, sincerely

wisheth grace from heauen, and most prosperous
successe in all their honest attemptes and
exercises.

D(Divine) Iuine Plato, the great Master of many worthy Philosophers, and the constant auoucher, and pithy perswader of Vnum, Bonum, and Ens: in his Schole and Academie, sundry times (besides his ordinary Scholers) was visited of a certaine kinde of men, allured by the noble fame of Plato, and the great commendation of hys profound and profitable doctrine. But when such Hearers, after long harkening to him, perceaued, that the drift of his discourses issued out, to conclude, this Vnum, Bonum, and Ens, to be Spirituall, Infinite, Æternall, Omnipotent, &c. Nothyng beyng alledged or expressed, How, worldly goods: how, worldly dignitie: how, health, Strẽgth or lustines of body: nor yet the meanes, how a merueilous sensible and bodyly blysse and felicitie hereafter, might be atteyned: Straightway, the fantasies of those hearers, were dampt: their opinion of Plato, was clene chaunged: yea his doctrine was by them despised: and his schole, no more of them visited. Which thing, his Scholer, Aristotle, narrowly cõsidering, founde the cause therof, to be, For that they had no forwarnyng and information, in generall, whereto his doctrine tended. For, so, might they haue had occasion, either to haue forborne his schole hauntyng: (if they, then, had misliked his Scope and purpose) or constantly to haue continued therin: to their full satisfaction: if such his finall scope & intent, had ben to their desire. Wherfore, Aristotle, euer, after that, vsed in brief, to forewarne his owne Scholers and hearers, both of what matter, and also to what ende, he tooke in hand to speake, or teach. While I consider the diuerse trades of these two excellent Philosophers (and am most sure, both, that Plato right well, otherwise could teach: and that Aristotle mought boldely, with his hearers, haue dealt in like sorte as Plato did) I am in no little pang of perplexitie: Bycause, that, which I mislike, is most easy for me to performe (and to haue Plato for my exãple.) And that, which I know to be most commendable: and (in this first bringyng, into common handling, the Artes Mathematicall) to be most necessary: is full of great difficultie and sundry daungers. Yet, neither do I think it mete, for so straunge matter (as now is ment to be published) and to so straunge an audience, to be bluntly, at first, put forth, without a peculiar Preface: Nor (Imitatyng Aristotle) well can I hope, that accordyng to the amplenes and dignitie of the State Mathematicall, I am able, either playnly to prescribe the materiall boundes: or precisely to expresse the chief purposes, and most wonderfull applications therof. And though I am sure, that such as did shrinke from Plato his schole, after they had perceiued his finall || conclusion, would in these thinges haue ben his most diligent hearers (so infinitely mought their desires, in fine and at length, by our Artes Mathematicall be satisfied) yet, by this my Præface & forewarnyng, Aswell all such, may (to their great behofe) the soner, hither be allured: as also the Pythagoricall, and Platonicall perfect scholer, and the constant profound Philosopher, with more ease and spede, may (like the Bee,) gather, hereby, both wax and hony.

D(Divine) In the works of Plato, the great master of many distinguished philosophers, and the unwavering advocate and persuasive promoter of Vnum, Bonum, and Ens: in his school and academy, he was often visited by a certain kind of people drawn by Plato's noble reputation and the high praise of his deep and valuable teachings. However, when these listeners, after a long time of hearing him, realized that the aim of his discussions was to conclude that this Vnum, Bonum, and Ens was spiritual, infinite, eternal, omnipotent, etc., without any explanation of how worldly goods, worldly status, health, strength, or physical allure could lead to a marvelous sensory and bodily bliss and happiness in the future, their enthusiasm waned; their view of Plato changed completely; indeed, they dismissed his teachings, and his school was no longer attended by them. This situation, closely observed by his student Aristotle, led him to find the reason: Because they had no warning or general information about the purpose of his teachings. If they had, they might have had the chance to either avoid attending his school (if they found his aim and purpose unappealing) or to remain consistently engaged in it to their satisfaction if his ultimate goal had aligned with their desires. Therefore, Aristotle always made sure to briefly warn his own students and listeners about what matter he was discussing and also to what end he intended to speak or teach."” As I reflect on the different approaches of these two excellent philosophers (and I am confident that Plato could have taught very well in a different way, and that Aristotle could boldly have engaged with his listeners just as Plato did), I find myself in a bit of a quandary: what I dislike is much easier for me to accomplish (following Plato as my example), while that which I understand to be most commendable—and, in this initial effort to bring the Mathematical Arts into public discourse—is very difficult and full of various dangers. Yet, I also don't think it's appropriate to publish something so unfamiliar (as is now intended) to such an unfamiliar audience without a specific preface: nor can I, imitating Aristotle, confidently say that I can clearly define the material boundaries or precisely articulate the main purposes and most amazing applications of the Mathematical State. Although I am sure that those who turned away from Plato's school after they understood his ultimate conclusion would have been his most eager listeners (as their desires could ultimately have been infinitely satisfied by our Mathematical Arts), yet, with this preface and warning, all such individuals may (to their great benefit) be drawn here more quickly, and the Pythagorean and Platonic perfect scholar, along with the committed profound philosopher, may, with greater ease and speed, gather both wax and honey from this work, much like a bee.

Wherfore, seyng I finde great occasion (for the causes alleged, and farder, in respect of my Art Mathematike generall) to vse a certaine forewarnyng and Præface, whose content shalbe, The intent of this Preface. that mighty, most plesaunt, and frutefull Mathematicall Tree, with his chief armes and second (grifted) braunches: Both, what euery one is, and also, what commodity, in generall, is to be looked for, aswell of griff as stocke: And forasmuch as this enterprise is so great, that, to this our tyme, it neuer was (to my knowledge) by any achieued: And also it is most hard, in these our drery dayes, to such rare and straunge Artes, to wyn due and common credit: Neuertheles, if, for my sincere endeuour to satisfie your honest expectation, you will but lend me your thãkefull mynde a while: and, to such matter as, for this time, my penne (with spede) is hable to deliuer, apply your eye or eare attentifely: perchaunce, at once, and for the first salutyng, this Preface you will finde a lesson long enough. And either you will, for a second (by this) be made much the apter: or shortly become, well hable your selues, of the lyons claw, to coniecture his royall symmetrie, and farder propertie. Now then, gentle, my frendes, and countrey men, Turne your eyes, and bend your myndes to that doctrine, which for our present purpose, my simple talent is hable to yeld you.

Therefore, seeing that I find a significant reason (for the causes mentioned, and further, in regard to my General Mathematical Art) to use a certain warning and Preface, whose content shall be, The purpose of this Preface. that mighty, most enjoyable, and fruitful Mathematical Tree, with its main branches and secondary (gifted) branches: both, what each one is, and also, what benefits, in general, are to be expected, both from the gifts and the roots: And since this endeavor is so great that, to my knowledge, it has never been achieved by anyone up to this time: And also, it is very difficult, in these gloomy days, for such rare and strange arts to gain proper and widespread recognition: However, if, for my genuine effort to meet your reasonable expectations, you will just lend me your grateful mind for a moment: and, to the matters that, for now, my pen (quickly) can deliver, focus your eyes or ears attentively: perhaps, at once, and for the first greeting, this Preface you will find quite lengthy. And either you will, for a second (by this) become much more prepared: or soon be able to discern the royal symmetry and further properties of the lion's claw yourselves. Now then, gentle friends and fellow countrymen, turn your eyes and focus your minds on that knowledge, which for our current purpose, my simple talent is able to provide you.

All thinges which are, & haue beyng, are found vnder a triple diuersitie generall. For, either, they are demed Supernaturall, Naturall, or, of a third being. Thinges Supernaturall, are immateriall, simple, indiuisible, incorruptible, & vnchangeable. Things Naturall, are materiall, compounded, diuisible, corruptible, and chaungeable. Thinges Supernaturall, are, of the minde onely, comprehended: Things Naturall, of the sense exterior, ar hable to be perceiued. In thinges Naturall, probabilitie and coniecture hath place: But in things Supernaturall, chief demõstration, & most sure Science is to be had. By which properties & comparasons of these two, more easily may be described, the state, condition, nature and property of those thinges, which, we before termed of a third being: which, by a peculier name also, are called Thynges Mathematicall. For, these, beyng (in a maner) middle, betwene thinges supernaturall and naturall: are not so absolute and excellent, as thinges supernatural: Nor yet so base and grosse, as things naturall: But are thinges immateriall: and neuerthelesse, by materiall things hable somewhat to be signified. And though their particular Images, by Art, are aggregable and diuisible: yet the generall Formes, notwithstandyng, are constant, vnchaungeable, vntrãsformable, and incorruptible. Neither of the sense, can they, at any tyme, be perceiued or iudged. Nor yet, for all that, in the royall mynde of man, first conceiued. But, surmountyng the imperfectiõ of coniecture, weenyng and opinion: and commyng short of high intellectuall cõceptiõ, are the Mercurial fruite of Dianœticall discourse, in perfect imagination subsistyng. A meruaylous newtralitie haue these thinges Mathematicall, and also a straunge participatiõ betwene thinges supernaturall, immortall, intellectual, simple and indiuisible: and thynges naturall, mortall, sensible, compounded and diuisible. Probabilitie and sensible prose, may well serue in thinges naturall: and is commendable: In Mathematicall reasoninges, a probable Argument, is nothyng regarded: nor yet the testimony of sense, any whit credited: But onely a perfect demonstration, of truthes certaine, necessary, and inuincible: vniuersally and necessaryly concluded: *.i is allowed as sufficient for an Argument exactly and purely Mathematical.

All things that exist and have being are classified under a general triple diversity. They are either considered Supernatural, Natural, or belong to a third category. Supernatural things are immaterial, simple, indivisible, incorruptible, and unchangeable. Natural things, on the other hand, are material, compound, divisible, corruptible, and changeable. Supernatural things can only be understood by the mind, while Natural things can be perceived by the senses. In Natural things, probability and conjecture are relevant; but in Supernatural things, definitive demonstration and secure science are present. These properties and comparisons of the two make it easier to describe the state, condition, nature, and properties of what we referred to as a third category: things known as Mathematical Things. These things, in a way, are in the middle between supernatural and natural things: they are not as absolute and excellent as supernatural things, nor as base and crude as natural things. They are immaterial, yet they can signify certain aspects of material things. Although their particular images can be crafted and divided by art, the general Forms remain constant, unchangeable, untransformable, and incorruptible. At no time can they be perceived or judged by the senses, nor can they be initially conceived in the royal mind of man. Rather, surpassing the imperfection of conjecture, assumption, and opinion, and falling short of high intellectual conception, they are the Mercurial fruits of Dianœtic discourse, existing in perfect imagination. There is a remarkable neutrality in these Mathematical Things, and also a strange participation between supernatural, immortal, intellectual, simple, and indivisible things, and natural, mortal, sensible, compound, and divisible things. Probability and sensible prose serve well in natural things and are commendable; however, in Mathematical reasoning, a probable argument is not valued at all, nor is the testimony of senses given any credence. Instead, only a perfect demonstration of certain, necessary, and invincible truths, universally and necessarily concluded, is allowed as sufficient for an Argument exactly and purely Mathematical."”

Of Mathematicall thinges, are two principall kindes: namely, Number, and Magnitude. Number. Number, we define, to be, a certayne Mathematicall Sũme, of Vnits. Note the worde, Vnit, to expresse the Greke Monas, & not Vnitie: as we haue all, commonly, till now, vsed. And, an Vnit, is that thing Mathematicall, Indiuisible, by participation of some likenes of whose property, any thing, which is in deede, or is counted One, may resonably be called One. We account an Vnit, a thing Mathematicall, though it be no Number, and also indiuisible: because, of it, materially, Number doth consist: which, principally, is a thing Mathematicall. Magnitude. Magnitude is a thing Mathematicall, by participation of some likenes of whose nature, any thing is iudged long, broade, or thicke. A thicke Magnitude we call a Solide, or a Body. What Magnitude so euer, is Solide or Thicke, is also broade, & long. A broade magnitude, we call a Superficies or a Plaine. Euery playne magnitude, hath also length. A long magnitude, we terme a Line. A Line is neither thicke nor broade, but onely long: Euery certayne Line, hath two endes: A point. The endes of a line, are Pointes called. A Point, is a thing Mathematicall, indiuisible, which may haue a certayne determined situation. If a Poynt moue from a determined situation, the way wherein it moued, is also a Line: mathematically produced, whereupon, of the auncient Mathematiciens, A Line.Line is called the race or course of a Point. A Poynt we define, by the name of a thing Mathematicall: though it be no Magnitude, and indiuisible: because it is the propre ende, and bound of a Line: which is a true Magnitude. Magnitude. And Magnitude we may define to be that thing Mathematicall, which is diuisible for euer, in partes diuisible, long, broade or thicke. Therefore though a Poynt be no Magnitude, yet Terminatiuely, we recken it a thing Mathematicall (as I sayd) by reason it is properly the end, and bound of a line. Neither Number, nor Magnitude, haue any Materialitie. First, we will consider of Number, and of the Science Mathematicall, to it appropriate, called Arithmetike: and afterward of Magnitude, and his Science, called Geometrie. But that name contenteth me not: whereof a word or two hereafter shall be sayd. How Immateriall and free from all matter, Number is, who doth not perceaue? yea, who doth not wonderfully wõder at it? For, neither pure Element, nor Aristoteles, Quinta Essentia, is hable to serue for Number, as his propre matter. Nor yet the puritie and simplenes of Substance Spirituall or Angelicall, will be found propre enough thereto. And therefore the great & godly Philosopher Anitius Boetius, sayd: Omnia quæcunque a primæua rerum natura constructa sunt, Numerorum videntur ratione formata. Hoc enim fuit principale in animo Conditoris Exemplar. That is: All thinges (which from the very first originall being of thinges, haue bene framed and made) do appeare to be Formed by the reason of Numbers. For this was the principall example or patterne in the minde of the Creator. O comfortable allurement, O rauishing perswasion, to deale with a Science, whose Subiect, is so Auncient, so pure, so excellent, so surmounting all creatures, so vsed of the Almighty and incomprehensible wisdome of the Creator, in the distinct creation of all creatures: in all their distinct partes, properties, natures, and vertues, by order, and most absolute number, brought, from Nothing, to the Formalitie of their being and state. By Numbers propertie therefore, of vs, by all possible meanes, (to the perfection of the Science) learned, we may both winde and draw our selues into the inward and deepe search and vew, of all creatures distinct vertues, natures, properties, and Formes: And also, farder, arise, clime, ascend, and mount vp (with Speculatiue winges) in spirit, to behold in the Glas of Creation, the Forme of Formes, the Exemplar Number of all thinges Numerable: both visible and inuisible, mortall and || immortall, Corporall and Spirituall. Part of this profound and diuine Science, had Ioachim the Prophesier atteyned vnto: by Numbers Formall, Naturall, and Rationall, forseyng, concludyng, and forshewyng great particular euents, long before their comming. His bookes yet remainyng, hereof, are good profe: And the noble Earle of Mirandula, (besides that,) a sufficient witnesse: that Ioachim, in his prophesies, proceded by no other way, then by Numbers Formall. And this Earle hym selfe, in Rome, Ano. 1488. *set vp 900. Conclusions, in all kinde of Sciences, openly to be disputed of: and among the rest, in his Conclusions Mathematicall, (in the eleuenth Conclusion) hath in Latin, this English sentence. By Numbers, a way is had, to the searchyng out, and vnderstandyng of euery thyng, hable to be knowen. For the verifying of which Conclusion, I promise to aunswere to the 74. Questions, vnder written, by the way of Numbers. Which Cõclusions, I omit here to rehearse: aswell auoidyng superfluous prolixitie: as, bycause Ioannes Picus, workes, are commonly had. But, in any case, I would wish that those Conclusions were red diligently, and perceiued of such, as are earnest Obseruers and Considerers of the constant law of nũbers: which is planted in thyngs Naturall and Supernaturall: and is prescribed to all Creatures, inuiolably to be kept. For, so, besides many other thinges, in those Conclusions to be marked, it would apeare, how sincerely, & within my boundes, I disclose the wonderfull mysteries, by numbers, to be atteyned vnto.

Of Mathematical things, there are two main types: Number and Magnitude. Number. Number is defined as a certain mathematical sum of Units. Please note the term "Unit" to represent the Greek Monas, not "Unity," as we have all commonly used until now. And, a Unit is that mathematical thing, indivisible, which may reasonably be called One. We consider a Unit to be a mathematical entity, though it is not a Number, because Number consists materially of it: which is fundamentally a mathematical thing. Magnitude. Magnitude is a mathematical thing, which, by sharing some likeness of its nature, allows any object to be judged as long, broad, or thick. A thick Magnitude we call a Solid, or a Body. Any Magnitude that is Solid or Thick is also broad and long. A broad magnitude is referred to as a Surface or a Plane. Every plain magnitude also has length. A long magnitude is called a Line. A Line is neither thick nor broad, but only long. Every specific Line has two ends: A point. The ends of a line are called Points. A Point is a mathematical thing, indivisible, that can have a certain determined position. If a Point moves from a determined position, the path it moves along is also a Line: mathematically produced, from which ancient mathematicians A Line. defined a Line as the race or course of a Point. A Point we define as a mathematical entity: though it is not a Magnitude and is indivisible, because it is the proper end and boundary of a Line: which is a true Magnitude. Magnitude. And Magnitude can be defined as that mathematical thing which is endlessly divisible into parts, long, broad, or thick. Therefore, although a Point is not a Magnitude, we can consider it a mathematical entity (as I mentioned) because it is essentially the end and boundary of a line. Neither Number nor Magnitude have any material existence. First, we will consider Number, and the science associated with it, called Arithmetic: and afterward Magnitude and its science, called Geometry. But that name alone does not satisfy me: a word or two shall be mentioned hereafter. How immaterial and free from all matter Number is, who does not perceive? Yes, who does not marvel at it? For neither pure Element nor Aristotle's Quintessence can serve as the proper matter for Number. Nor can the purity and simplicity of spiritual or angelic substance be found proper enough for it. Therefore, the great and revered philosopher Anicius Boethius said: All things (which from the very primal nature of things have been formed and made) seem to be shaped by the reason of Numbers. For this was the primary example or pattern in the mind of the Creator. That is: Everything that has been created since the very beginning seems to be shaped by the logic of Numbers. This was the main example or template in the Creator's mind. O comforting allure, O delightful persuasion, to engage in a science, whose subject is so ancient, so pure, so excellent, so surpassing all creatures, so employed by the Almighty and incomprehensible wisdom of the Creator, in the distinct creation of all creatures: in all their distinct parts, properties, natures, and virtues, through order and the most absolute number brought, from Nothing, to the Formal of their being and state. By the property of Numbers thus, we can, by all possible means (to achieve the perfection of the Science), deeply investigate and view the distinct virtues, natures, properties, and Forms of all creatures: and also further rise, climb, ascend, and soar (with speculative wings) in spirit, to behold in the Glass of Creation, the Form of Forms, the Exemplar Number of all Numerable things: both visible and invisible, mortal and || immortal, corporeal and spiritual. Part of this profound and divine Science was attained by Joachim the Prophet: through Formal, Natural, and Rational Numbers, foreseeing, concluding, and predicting great specific events long before their occurrence. His remaining books are good evidence of this. And the noble Earl of Mirandula serves as sufficient testimony: that Joachim, in his prophecies, proceeded by no other way than by Formal Numbers. This Earl himself, in Rome, 1488. *set forth 900 Conclusions in all kinds of Sciences to be openly debated: and among them, in his Mathematical Conclusions (in the eleventh Conclusion), has this English sentence in Latin: By Numbers, a way is had, to the searching out and understanding of everything that can be known. For the verification of this Conclusion, I promise to answer the 74 Questions written below, by the way of Numbers. I omit to repeat these Conclusions here: both to avoid unnecessary length and because Joannes Picus's works are commonly available. But in any case, I hope those Conclusions will be read carefully and understood by those who earnestly observe and consider the constant law of numbers: which is established in both Natural and Supernatural things: and is prescribed to all Creatures, to be upheld unbroken. For beyond many other aspects, in those Conclusions, it would appear how sincerely, and within my limits, I reveal the wonderful mysteries, to be attained through numbers.

Of my former wordes, easy it is to be gathered, that Number hath a treble state: One, in the Creator: an other in euery Creature (in respect of his complete constitution:) and the third, in Spirituall and Angelicall Myndes, and in the Soule of mã. In the first and third state, Number, is termed Number Numbryng. But in all Creatures, otherwise, Number, is termed Nũber Numbred. And in our Soule, Nũber beareth such a swaye, and hath such an affinitie therwith: that some of the old Philosophers taught, Mans Soule, to be a Number mouyng it selfe. And in dede, in vs, though it be a very Accident: yet such an Accident it is, that before all Creatures it had perfect beyng, in the Creator, Sempiternally. Number Numbryng therfore, is the discretion discerning, and distincting of thinges. But in God the Creator, This discretion, in the beginnyng, produced orderly and distinctly all thinges. For his Numbryng, then, was his Creatyng of all thinges. And his Continuall Numbryng, of all thinges, is the Conseruation of them in being: And, where and when he will lacke an Vnit: there and then, that particular thyng shalbe Discreated. Here I stay. But our Seuerallyng, distinctyng, and Numbryng, createth nothyng: but of Multitude considered, maketh certaine and distinct determination. And albeit these thynges be waighty and truthes of great importance, yet (by the infinite goodnes of the Almighty Ternarie,) Artificiall Methods and easy wayes are made, by which the zelous Philosopher, may wyn nere this Riuerish Ida, this Mountayne of Contemplation: and more then Contemplation. And also, though Number, be a thyng so Immateriall, so diuine, and æternall: yet by degrees, by litle and litle, stretchyng forth, and applying some likenes of it, as first, to thinges Spirituall: and then, bryngyng it lower, to thynges sensibly perceiued: as of a momentanye sounde iterated: then to the least thynges that may be seen, numerable: And at length, (most grossely,) to a multitude of any corporall thynges seen, or felt: and so, of these grosse and sensible thynges, we are trayned to learne a certaine Image or likenes of numbers: and to vse Arte in them to our pleasure and proffit. So grosse is our conuersation, and dull is our apprehension: while mortall Sense, in vs, ruleth the common wealth of our litle world. Hereby we say, Three Lyons, are three: or a Ternarie. Three Egles, are three, or a Ternarie.   Which* Ternaries, are eche, the Vnion, knot, and Vniformitie, of three discrete and distinct Vnits. That is, we may in eche Ternarie, thrise, seuerally pointe, and shew a part, One, One, and One. Where, in Numbryng, we say One, two, *.ij Three. But how farre, these visible Ones, do differre from our Indiuisible Vnits (in pure Arithmetike, principally considered) no man is ignorant. Yet from these grosse and materiall thynges, may we be led vpward, by degrees, so, informyng our rude Imagination, toward the cõceiuyng of Numbers, absolutely (:Not supposing, nor admixtyng any thyng created, Corporall or Spirituall, to support, conteyne, or represent those Numbers imagined:) that at length, we may be hable, to finde the number of our owne name, gloriously exemplified and registred in the booke of the Trinitie most blessed and æternall.

Of my previous words, it's easy to gather that Number has a threefold state: one in the Creator, another in every Creature (regarding its complete constitution), and the third in Spiritual and Angelic Minds, and in the Soul of man. In the first and third states, Number is referred to as Number Numbryng. But in all other Creatures, Number is called Nũber Numbred. And in our Soul, Nũber holds such influence and has such an affinity that some of the ancient Philosophers taught that Man's Soul is a Number moving itself. Indeed, in us, although it is a mere Accident, it is such an Accident that before all Creatures, it had perfect existence in the Creator, eternally. Therefore, Number Numbryng is the discernment and distinction of things. But in God the Creator, this discernment, at the beginning, produced all things orderly and distinctly. For His Numbryng was His Creation of all things. And His continuous Numbryng of all things is their preservation in existence; and wherever and whenever He will lack a Unit, that particular thing shall be Discreated. Here I pause. But our separating, distinguishing, and Numbryng create nothing; rather, by considering Multitude, we make certain and distinct determinations. And although these things are significant and truths of great importance, yet (by the infinite goodness of the Almighty Ternarie), artificial methods and easier ways are created, through which the diligent Philosopher can reach this River-like Ida, this Mountain of Contemplation, and even beyond Contemplation. Also, although Number is something so immaterial, so divine, and eternal, we can gradually, little by little, extend and apply some resemblance of it, first to spiritual things, and then lower to things we perceive with our senses, such as a momentary repeated sound; then to the smallest things that can be seen and counted; and finally, (in a more basic sense) to a multitude of any physical things seen or felt. Thus, from these rough and tangible things, we are trained to learn a certain image or likeness of numbers, and to use art in them for our pleasure and benefit. Our conversations are so coarse, and our understanding is dull, while mortal Sense rules the commonwealth of our little world. Hence we say, three lions are three, or a Ternarie. Three eagles are three, or a Ternarie.   Which Ternaries are each the Union, knot, and Uniformity of three discrete and distinct Units. That is, in each Ternarie, we can point out and show a part thrice: One, One, and One. In Numbryng, we say one, two, *.ij three. But how far these visible Ones differ from our Indivisible Units (in pure Arithmetike, principally considered), no one is ignorant. Yet from these coarse and material things, we may be led upward by degrees, informing our rough imagination toward the conception of Numbers absolutely (not assuming or mixing in anything created, physical or spiritual, to support, contain, or represent those imagined Numbers), so that eventually, we may be able to find the number of our own name, gloriously exemplified and recorded in the book of the most blessed and eternal Trinity.

But farder vnderstand, that vulgar Practisers, haue Numbers, otherwise, in sundry Considerations: and extend their name farder, then to Numbers, whose least part is an Vnit. For the common Logist, Reckenmaster, or Arithmeticien, in hys vsing of Numbers: of an Vnit, imagineth lesse partes: and calleth them Fractions. As of an Vnit, he maketh an halfe, and thus noteth it, ½. and so of other, (infinitely diuerse) partes of an Vnit. Yea and farder, hath, Fractions of Fractions. &c. And, forasmuch, as, Addition, Substraction, Multiplication, Diuision and Extraction of Rotes, are the chief, and sufficient partes of Arithmetike: Arithmetike. which is, the Science that demonstrateth the properties, of Numbers, and all operatiõs, in numbers to be performed: Note. How often, therfore, these fiue sundry sortes of Operations, do, for the most part, of their execution, differre from the fiue operations of like generall property and name, in our Whole numbers practisable, So often, (for a more distinct doctrine) we, vulgarly account and name it, an other kynde of Arithmetike. And by this reason: 1. the Consideration, doctrine, and working, in whole numbers onely: where, of an Vnit, is no lesse part to be allowed: is named (as it were) an Arithmetike by it selfe. And so of the Arithmetike of Fractions. 2. In lyke sorte, the necessary, wonderfull and Secret doctrine of Proportion, and proportionalytie hath purchased vnto it selfe a peculier maner of handlyng and workyng: and so may seme an other forme of Arithmetike. 3. Moreouer, the Astronomers, for spede and more commodious calculation, haue deuised a peculier maner of orderyng nũbers, about theyr circular motions, by Sexagenes, and Sexagesmes. By Signes, Degrees and Minutes &c. which commonly is called the Arithmetike of Astronomical or Phisicall Fractions. That, haue I briefly noted, by the name of Arithmetike Circular. Bycause it is also vsed in circles, not Astronomicall. &c. 4. Practise hath led Numbers farder, and hath framed them, to take vpon them, the shew of Magnitudes propertie: Which is Incommensurabilitie and Irrationalitie. (For in pure Arithmetike, an Vnit, is the common Measure of all Numbers.) And, here, Nũbers are become, as Lynes, Playnes and Solides: some tymes Rationall, some tymes Irrationall. And haue propre and peculier characters, (as 2√. 3√. and so of other.A Which is to signifie Rote Square, Rote Cubik: and so forth:) & propre and peculier fashions in the fiue principall partes: Wherfore the practiser, estemeth this, a diuerse Arithmetike from the other. Practise bryngeth in, here, diuerse compoundyng of Numbers: as some tyme, two, three, foure (or more) Radicall nũbers, diuersly knit, by signes, of More & Lesse: as thus 2√12 + 3√15. Or thus 4√19 + 3√12 - 2√2. &c. And some tyme with whole numbers, or fractions of whole Number, amõg them: as 20 + 2√24. 3√16 + 33 - 2√10. 4√44 + 12¼ + 3√9. And so, infinitely, may hap the varietie. After this: Both the one and the other hath fractions incident: and so is this Arithmetike greately enlarged, by diuerse exhibityng and vse of Compositions and mixtynges. Consider how, I (beyng desirous to deliuer the student from error and Cauillation) do giue to this Practise, the name of the Arithmetike of Radicall numbers: Not, of Irrationall or Surd Numbers: which other while, are Rationall: though they haue the Signe of a Rote before || them, which, Arithmetike of whole Numbers most vsuall, would say they had no such Roote: and so account them Surd Numbers: which, generally spokẽ, is vntrue: as Euclides tenth booke may teach you. Therfore to call them, generally, Radicall Numbers, (by reason of the signe √. prefixed,) is a sure way: and a sufficient generall distinction from all other ordryng and vsing of Numbers: And yet (beside all this) Consider: the infinite desire of knowledge, and incredible power of mans Search and Capacitye: how, they, ioyntly haue waded farder (by mixtyng of speculation and practise) and haue found out, and atteyned to the very chief perfection (almost) of Numbers Practicall vse. Which thing, is well to be perceiued in that great Arithmeticall Arte of Æquation: commonly called the Rule of Coss. or Algebra. The Latines termed it, Regulam Rei & Census, that is, the Rule of the thyng and his value. With an apt name: comprehendyng the first and last pointes of the worke. And the vulgar names, both in Italian, Frenche and Spanish, depend (in namyng it,) vpon the signification of the Latin word, Res: A thing: vnleast they vse the name of Algebra. And therin (commonly) is a dubble error. The one, of them, which thinke it to be of Geber his inuentyng: the other of such as call it Algebra. For, first, though Geber for his great skill in Numbers, Geometry, Astronomy, and other maruailous Artes, mought haue semed hable to haue first deuised the sayd Rule: and also the name carryeth with it a very nere likenes of Geber his name: yet true it is, that a Greke Philosopher and Mathematicien, named Diophantus, before Geber his tyme, wrote 13. bookes therof (of which, six are yet extant: and I had them to *vse, * Anno. 1550. of the famous Mathematicien, and my great frende, Petrus Montaureus:) And secondly, the very name, is Algiebar, and not Algebra: as by the Arabien Auicen, may be proued: who hath these precise wordes in Latine, by Andreas Alpagus (most perfect in the Arabik tung) so translated. Scientia faciendi Algiebar & Almachabel. i. Scientia inueniendi numerum ignotum, per additionem Numeri, & diuisionem & æquationem. Which is to say: The Science of workyng Algiebar and Almachabel, that is, the Science of findyng an vnknowen number, by Addyng of a Number, & Diuision & æquation. Here haue you the name: and also the principall partes of the Rule, touched. To name it, The rule, or Art of Æquation, doth signifie the middle part and the State of the Rule. This Rule, hath his peculier Characters: 5. and the principal partes of Arithmetike, to it appertayning, do differre from the other Arithmeticall operations. This Arithmetike, hath Nũbers Simple, Cõpound, Mixt: and Fractions, accordingly. This Rule, and Arithmetike of Algiebar, is so profound, so generall and so (in maner) conteyneth the whole power of Numbers Application practicall: that mans witt, can deale with nothyng, more proffitable about numbers: nor match, with a thyng, more mete for the diuine force of the Soule, (in humane Studies, affaires, or exercises) to be tryed in. Perchaunce you looked for, (long ere now,) to haue had some particular profe, or euident testimony of the vse, proffit and Commodity of Arithmetike vulgar, in the Common lyfe and trade of men. Therto, then, I will now frame my selfe: But herein great care I haue, least length of sundry profes, might make you deme, that either I did misdoute your zelous mynde to vertues schole: or els mistrust your hable witts, by some, to gesse much more. A profe then, foure, fiue, or six, such, will I bryng, as any reasonable man, therwith may be persuaded, to loue & honor, yea learne and exercise the excellent Science of Arithmetike.

But further understand that regular practitioners have numbers, in many different aspects. They extend their definition beyond just numbers, where the smallest part is a Unit. For the common logician, calculator, or mathematician, when working with numbers, they envision smaller parts of a unit and call them Fractions. For instance, from a Unit, they create a half, marking it as ½, and likewise for other (infinitely diverse) parts of a Unit. Moreover, they also have Fractions of Fractions, etc. And since Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication, Division, and Extraction of Roots are the main and sufficient parts of Arithmetic: Math. This is the Science that demonstrates the properties of Numbers, and all operations to be performed with them: Note. How often, therefore, these five different types of operations differ, for the most part, in their execution from the five operations of similar general properties and names in our whole numbers: so often (for clearer teaching) we commonly refer to it as another kind of Arithmetic. And for this reason: 1. the consideration, teaching, and work with whole numbers only: where a Unit is no less part allowed, is referred to (so to speak) as Arithmetic by itself. And similarly for Arithmetic of Fractions. 2. In the same way, the necessary, wonderful, and secret doctrine of Proportion has acquired its own way of handling and working, making it seem like another form of Arithmetic. 3. Furthermore, the Astronomers, for speed and convenience in calculations, have devised a specific way of arranging numbers about their circular motions, using sexagesimals. By Signs, Degrees, and Minutes, etc., which is commonly referred to as the Arithmetic of Astronomical or Physical Fractions. I have briefly noted this under the name of Circular Arithmetic, because it is also used in circles, not just Astronomical, etc. 4. Practice has further expanded Numbers and has shaped them to take on the appearance of Magnitudes properties: which are Incommensurability and Irrationality. (For in pure Arithmetic, a Unit is the common measure of all numbers.) Here, numbers have become like Lines, Planes, and Solids: sometimes Rational, sometimes Irrational. They have unique and specific symbols, (like 2√, 3√, and so forth.A This signifies Square Root, Cube Root: and so on): and unique styles in the five main parts. Therefore, the practitioner regards this as a different Arithmetic from the others. Practice introduces various combinations of Numbers: sometimes two, three, four (or more) Radical numbers, combined in different ways by signs of More & Less: such as 2√12 + 3√15. Or 4√19 + 3√12 - 2√2, etc. And sometimes with whole numbers or fractions of whole numbers among them: such as 20 + 2√24. 3√16 + 33 - 2√10. 4√44 + 12¼ + 3√9. And infinitely, such variety may occur. After this, both types involved have incidents of fractions: and so this Arithmetic is greatly expanded by various compositions and mixtures. Consider how I, being eager to help the student avoid error and confusion, name this Practice as the Arithmetic of Radical numbers: not Irrational or Surd Numbers: which sometimes are Rational, even if they have the sign of a root before them, which Arithmetic of whole numbers would usually say do not have such roots, thus categorizing them as Surd Numbers: which, generally spoken, is untrue: as Euclid's tenth book might teach you. Therefore, to refer to them generally as Radical Numbers, (due to the sign √ prefixed,) is a reliable way and a sufficient general distinction from all other arrangements and usages of Numbers: And yet (besides all this) consider: the infinite desire for knowledge and the incredible power of human Search and Capacity: how they have jointly delved deeper (through a mixture of theory and practice) and discovered, and achieved the utmost perfection (almost) of Numbers practical use. This is clearly demonstrated in the great art of Arithmetic known as Equation: commonly referred to as the Rule of Coss or Algebra. The Latins called it, Regulam Rei & Census, that is, the Understanding the concept and its significance. With an apt name: encompassing the beginning and the end points of the work. The common names in Italian, French, and Spanish depend (in how they name it) on the meaning of the Latin word, Res: A thing: unless they use the name Algebra. And therein lies (commonly) a double error. One, from those who think it originated from Geber's invention: and the other from those who call it Algebra. For, first, although Geber with his great skill in Numbers, Geometry, Astronomy, and other marvelous Arts, might seem capable of having first devised this Rule: and the name closely resembles Geber's name: it is true that a Greek philosopher and mathematician, named Diophantus, before Geber's time, wrote 13 books on it (of which six are still extant: and I had access to them to *use, 1550. from the famous mathematician and my great friend, Petrus Montaureus:). And secondly, the accurate name is Algiebar and not Algebra: as proven by the Arab Auicen, who has these exact words in Latin, as translated by Andreas Alpagus (most proficient in the Arabic tongue). Scientia faciendi Algiebar & Almachabel. i. Scientia inueniendi numerum ignotum, per additionem Numeri, & divisionem & aequationem. Which translates to: The Science of Working Algiebar and Almachabel, which means the The science of discovering an unknown number through addition, division, and equations. Here you have the name, and also the main parts of the Rule mentioned. To call it The rule, or Art of Equation, signifies the middle part and the state of the Rule. This Rule has its unique Characters: 5. and the main parts of Arithmetic relevant to it differ from the other arithmetic operations. This Arithmetic contains Simple, Compound, Mixed Numbers: and Fractions, accordingly. This Rule, and Arithmetic of Algiebar, is so profound, so general, and so (in a way) encompasses the whole power of Practical Number Application, that human intellect can deal with nothing more beneficial about numbers: nor find a thing more suited for the divine force of the Soul, (in human studies, affairs, or practices) to be tested in. Perhaps you have long awaited to have some specific proof or evident testimony of the use, benefit, and utility of common Arithmetic in everyday life and trade. To that end, I will now focus: but I take great care here, lest a lengthy discussion of various proofs might lead you to think either that I doubt your eager mind for virtue's school: or that I underestimate your capable intellects, by suggesting you might expect much more. I will provide, then, four, five, or six such examples, that any reasonable person might be persuaded to love & honor, indeed learn and practice, the excellent Science of Arithmetic.

And first: who, nerer at hand, can be a better witnesse of the frute receiued by Arithmetike, then all kynde of Marchants? Though not all, alike, either nede it, or vse it. How could they forbeare the vse and helpe of the Rule, called the Golden *.iij Rule? Simple and Compounde: both forward and backward? How might they misse Arithmeticall helpe in the Rules of Felowshyp: either without tyme, or with tyme? and betwene the Marchant & his Factor? The Rules of Bartering in wares onely: or part in wares, and part in money, would they gladly want? Our Marchant venturers, and Trauaylers ouer Sea, how could they order their doynges iustly and without losse, vnleast certaine and generall Rules for Exchaũge of money, and Rechaunge, were, for their vse, deuised? The Rule of Alligation, in how sundry cases, doth it conclude for them, such precise verities, as neither by naturall witt, nor other experience, they, were hable, els, to know? And (with the Marchant then to make an end) how ample & wonderfull is the Rule of False positions? especially as it is now, by two excellent Mathematiciens (of my familier acquayntance in their life time) enlarged? I meane Gemma Frisius, and Simon Iacob. Who can either in brief conclude, the generall and Capitall Rules? or who can Imagine the Myriades of sundry Cases, and particular examples, in Act and earnest, continually wrought, tried and concluded by the forenamed Rules, onely? How sundry other Arithmeticall practises, are commonly in Marchantes handes, and knowledge: They them selues, can, at large, testifie.

And first: who, if not nearby, can be a better witness to the benefits of Arithmetic than all kinds of merchants? Though not all merchants need it or use it the same way. How could they do without the help of the rule called the Golden *.iij Rule? Simple and Compound: both forwards and backwards? How could they manage without Arithmetic skills in the rules of partnership: either without timing or with timing? And between the merchant and his agent? Would they be willing to do without the rules for bartering goods alone or parts in goods and parts in money? Our merchant adventurers and travelers overseas, how could they manage their affairs justly and without loss, unless certain and general rules for the exchange and re-exchange of money were devised for their use? The Rule of Alligation, in how many cases, provides them with such precise truths that neither natural wit nor any other experience would enable them to know otherwise? And (to conclude with the merchant) how broad and remarkable is the Rule of False Positions? Especially as it has been expanded by two excellent mathematicians (whom I knew well during their lifetimes) namely Gemma Frisius and Simon Iacob. Who can concisely explain the general and fundamental rules? Or who can imagine the myriad of diverse cases and specific examples, acted upon and continually tested and resolved solely by those rules? How numerous other Arithmetic practices are commonly in the hands and knowledge of merchants: they themselves can confirm this in detail.

The Mintmaster, and Goldsmith, in their Mixture of Metals, either of diuerse kindes, or diuerse values: how are they, or may they, exactly be directed, and meruailously pleasured, if Arithmetike be their guide? And the honorable Phisiciãs, will gladly confesse them selues, much beholding to the Science of Arithmetike, and that sundry wayes: But chiefly in their Art of Graduation, and compounde Medicines. And though Galenus, Auerrois, Arnoldus, Lullus, and other haue published their positions, aswell in the quantities of the Degrees aboue Temperament, as in the Rules, concluding the new Forme resulting: yet a more precise, commodious, and easy Method, is extant: by a Countreyman of ours R. B. (aboue 200. yeares ago) inuented. And forasmuch as I am vncertaine, who hath the same: or when that litle Latin treatise, (as the Author writ it,) shall come to be Printed: (Both to declare the desire I haue to pleasure my Countrey, wherin I may: and also, for very good profe of Numbers vse, in this most subtile and frutefull, Philosophicall Conclusion,) I entend in the meane while, most briefly, and with my farder helpe, to communicate the pith therof vnto you.

The Mintmaster and Goldsmith, in their mixture of metals, whether of different types or different values: how can they be accurately guided and wonderfully pleased if Arithmetic is their mentor? And the esteemed physicians will readily admit they owe a lot to the science of Arithmetic, in many ways: but mainly in their art of dosage and compound medicines. Although Galen, Averroes, Arnold, Lullus, and others have published their theories regarding the quantities of degrees above temperament and the rules leading to the new Form that results, there exists a more precise, convenient, and easier Method invented by a fellow countryman of ours R. B. (over 200 years ago). And since I'm uncertain who possesses the same or when that little Latin treatise (as the author wrote it) will be printed: (both to express my desire to benefit my country as much as I can, and also for a very good demonstration of the practical use of numbers in this most subtle and fruitful philosophical conclusion), I intend, in the meantime, to briefly share the essence of it with you, with my further assistance.

First describe a circle: whose diameter let be an inch. Diuide the Circumference into foure equall partes. Frõ the Center, by those 4. sections, extend 4. right lines: eche of 4. inches and a halfe long: or of as many as you liste, aboue 4. without the circumference of the circle: So that they shall be of 4. inches long (at the least) without the Circle. Make good euident markes, at euery inches end. If you list, you may subdiuide the inches againe into 10. or 12. smaller partes, equall. At the endes of the lines, write the names of the 4. principall elementall Qualities. Hote and Colde, one against the other. And likewise Moyst and Dry, one against the other. And in the Circle write Temperate. Which Temperature hath a good Latitude: as appeareth by the Complexion of man. And therefore we haue allowed vnto it, the foresayd Circle: and not a point Mathematicall or Physicall.B

First, describe a circle with a diameter of one inch. Divide the circumference into four equal parts. From the center, draw four straight lines from those sections, each 4.5 inches long or as long as you like, extending 4 inches outside the circumference of the circle. Make clear marks at the end of each inch. If you wish, you can subdivide the inches again into 10 or 12 smaller equal parts. At the ends of the lines, write the names of the four main elemental qualities: Hot and Cold facing each other, and Moist and Dry facing each other. Write Temperate inside the circle. This Temperature has a good range, as shown by human complexion. Therefore, we have assigned it to the mentioned circle, rather than a mathematical or physical point. B

diagram: see end of text for alternative

diagram: see end of text for alternative

* Consider some of Lullus's advice in his book on Q. Essentia.

Now, when you haue two thinges Miscible, whose degrees are * truely knowen: Of necessitie, either they are of one Quantitie and waight, or of diuerse. If they be of one Quantitie and waight: whether their formes, be Contrary Qualities, or of one kinde (but of diuerse intentions and degrees) or a Temperate, and a Contrary, The forme resulting of their Mixture, is in the Middle betwene the degrees of || the formes mixt. As for example, let A, be Moist in the first degree: and B, Dry in the third degree. Adde 1. and 3. that maketh 4: the halfe or middle of 4. is 2. This 2. is the middle, equally distant from A and B (for the * Note. *Temperament is counted none. And for it, you must put a Ciphre, if at any time, it be in mixture). Counting then from B, 2. degrees, toward A: you finde it to be Dry in the first degree: So is the Forme resulting of the Mixture of A, and B, in our example. I will geue you an other example. Suppose, you haue two thinges, as C, and D: and of C, the Heate to be in the 4. degree: and of D, the Colde, to be remisse, euen vnto the Temperament. Now, for C, you take 4: and for D, you take a Ciphre: which, added vnto 4, yeldeth onely 4. The middle, or halfe, whereof, is 2. Wherefore the Forme resulting of C, and D, is Hote in the second degree: for, 2. degrees, accounted from C, toward D, ende iuste in the 2. degree of heate. Of the third maner, I will geue also an example: which let be this: Note. I haue a liquid Medicine whose Qualitie of heate is in the 4. degree exalted: as was C, in the example foregoing: and an other liquid Medicine I haue: whose Qualitie, is heate, in the first degree. Of eche of these, I mixt a like quantitie: Subtract here, the lesse frõ the more: and the residue diuide into two equall partes: whereof, the one part, either added to the lesse, or subtracted from the higher degree, doth produce the degree of the *.iiij Forme resulting, by this mixture of C, and E. As, if from 4. ye abate 1. there resteth 3. the halfe of 3. is 1½: Adde to 1. this 1½: you haue 2½. Or subtract from 4. this 1½: you haue likewise 2½ remayning. Which declareth, the Forme resulting, to be Heate, in the middle of the third degree.

Now, when you have two mixable things, whose degrees are * truly known: They must either be the same in quantity and weight, or different. If they are the same in quantity and weight: whether their forms have opposing qualities, or are of the same kind (but with different intentions and degrees) or a Temperate and a Contrary, the form resulting from their mixture is in the middle between the degrees of the mixed forms. For example, let A be Moist in the first degree, and B be Dry in the third degree. Add 1 and 3, which makes 4; the half or middle of 4 is 2. This 2 is the middle, equally distant from A and B (for the * Reminder.*Temperament is counted as none. And for it, you must put a zero if it’s ever in the mixture). Counting then from B, 2 degrees toward A: you find it to be Dry in the first degree: So the Form resulting from the mixture of A and B is as we discussed. I will give you another example. Suppose you have two things, like C and D: and for C, the heat is in the 4th degree; and for D, the cold is mild, even to the Temperament. Now, for C, you take 4; and for D, you take a zero: which added to 4 gives only 4. The middle, or half, of this is 2. Therefore, the Form resulting from C and D is hot in the second degree: since counting 2 degrees from C toward D, you land exactly in the 2nd degree of heat. For the third method, I will also give an example: which is this: Note. I have a liquid medicine whose heat quality is exalted in the 4th degree: like C, in the previous example: and another liquid medicine whose heat quality is in the first degree. From each of these, I mix equal quantities: Subtract the lesser from the greater: and divide the remainder into two equal parts: whereof, one part, either added to the lesser, or subtracted from the higher degree, produces the degree of the *.iiij
resulting form from this mixture of C and E. For instance, if you subtract 1 from 4, you have 3; the half of 3 is 1½: Add this 1½ to 1, and you get 2½. Or subtract this 1½ from 4, and you also get 2½ remaining. This shows that the Forme resulting is Heat, in the middle of the third degree.

The Second Rule. But if the Quantities of two thinges Commixt, be diuerse, and the Intensions (of their Formes Miscible) be in diuerse degrees, and heigthes. (Whether those Formes be of one kinde, or of Contrary kindes, or of a Temperate and a Contrary, What proportion is of the lesse quantitie to the greater, the same shall be of the difference, which is betwene the degree of the Forme resulting, and the degree of the greater quantitie of the thing miscible, to the difference, which is betwene the same degree of the Forme resulting, and the degree of the lesse quantitie. As for example. Let two pound of Liquor be geuen, hote in the 4. degree: & one pound of Liquor be geuen, hote in the third degree. I would gladly know the Forme resulting, in the Mixture of these two Liquors. Set downe your nũbers in order, thus. diagram: see end of text for alternative Now by the rule of Algiebar, haue I deuised a very easie, briefe, and generall maner of working in this case. Let vs first, suppose that Middle Forme resulting, to be 1X: as that Rule teacheth. And because (by our Rule, here geuen) as the waight of 1. is to 2: So is the difference betwene 4. (the degree of the greater quantitie) and 1X: to the difference betwene 1X and 3: (the degree of the thing, in lesse quãtitie. And with all, 1X, being alwayes in a certaine middell, betwene the two heigthes or degrees). For the first difference, I set 4-1X: and for the second, I set 1X-3. And, now againe, I say, as 1. is to 2. so is 4-1X to 1X-3. Wherfore, of these foure proportionall numbers, the first and the fourth Multiplied, one by the other, do make as much, as the second and the third Multiplied the one by the other. Let these Multiplications be made accordingly. And of the first and the fourth, we haue 1X-3. and of the second & the third, 8-2X. Wherfore, our Æquation is betwene 1X-3: and 8-2X. Which may be reduced, according to the Arte of Algiebar: as, here, adding 3. to eche part, geueth the Æquation, thus, 1X=11-2X. And yet againe, contracting, or Reducing it: Adde to eche part, 2X: Then haue you 3X æquall to 11: thus represented 3X=11. Wherefore, diuiding 11. by 3: the Quotient is 3⅔: the Valew of our 1X, Coss, or Thing, first supposed. And that is the heigth, or Intension of the Forme resulting: which is, Heate, in two thirdes of the fourth degree: And here I set the shew of the worke in conclusion, thus. The proufe hereof is easie: by subtracting 3. from 3⅔, diagram: see end of text for alternative resteth ⅔. Subtracte the same heigth of the Forme resulting, (which is 3⅔) frõ 4: then resteth ⅓: You see, that ⅔ is double to ⅓: as 2.P. is double to 1.P. So should it be: by the rule here geuen. Note. As you added to eche part of the Æquation, 3: so if ye first added to eche part 2X, it would stand, 3X-3=8. And now adding to eche part 3: you haue (as afore) 3X=11.

The 2nd Rule. If the quantities of two mixed substances are different, and the intensities (of their mixable forms) vary in degrees and levels—whether these forms are of the same type or opposing types, or a balanced and an opposing type—the ratio of the smaller quantity to the larger will mirror the difference between the resulting form's degree and the degree of the larger quantity of the mix, compared to the difference between the same degree of the resulting form and the degree of the smaller quantity. For example, if you have two pounds of liquid that is hot at the 4th degree, and one pound of liquid that is hot at the 3rd degree, I’d like to know the resulting form from mixing these two liquids. Arrange your numbers like this: diagram: see end of text for alternative According to the rule of Algebra, I’ve come up with a simple, brief, and general method for this. Let’s start by assuming the Middle Resulting Form to be 1X, as the rule suggests. And since (by our given rule) as the weight of 1 is to 2, so is the difference between 4 (the degree of the larger quantity) and 1X, to the difference between 1X and 3 (the degree of the lesser quantity). Moreover, 1X always stays at a middle point between the two extremes or degrees. For the first difference, I write 4 - 1X; and for the second, I write 1X - 3. Now again, I say, as 1 is to 2, so is 4 - 1X to 1X - 3. Therefore, the product of the first and fourth numbers equals the product of the second and third numbers. Let’s multiply them accordingly. From the first and fourth, we get 1X - 3, and from the second and third, we get 8 - 2X. Thus, our equation is between 1X - 3 and 8 - 2X, which can be simplified according to the principles of Algebra: by adding 3 to both sides, we obtain the equation 1X = 11 - 2X. Next, by rearranging it: add 2X to both parts, and you have 3X equal to 11, represented as 3X = 11. Therefore, dividing 11 by 3 gives a quotient of 3⅔, which is the Value of our initial 1X, Coss, or Thing. That is the intensity of the Resulting Form: which is Heat, at two-thirds of the fourth degree. Here, I will conclude with the demonstration of the work accordingly. The proof is simple: by subtracting 3 from 3⅔, diagram: see end of text for alternative you get ⅔. Subtracting the same height of the Resulting Form (which is 3⅔) from 4 leaves you with ⅓. You can see that ⅔ is double ⅓: just as 2.P is double 1.P. That’s how it should work according to the given rule. Note: as you added 3 to each side of the equation, if you had initially added 2X to each side, it would become 3X - 3 = 8. And by adding 3 to each side again, you have (as stated before) 3X = 11.

And though I, here, speake onely of two thyngs Miscible: and most commonly mo then three, foure, fiue or six, (&c.) are to be Mixed: (and in one Compound || to be reduced: & the Forme resultyng of the same, to serue the turne) yet these Rules are sufficient: duely repeated and iterated. Note. In procedyng first, with any two: and then, with the Forme Resulting, and an other: & so forth: For, the last worke, concludeth the Forme resultyng of them all: I nede nothing to speake, of the Mixture (here supposed) what it is. Common Philosophie hath defined it, saying, Mixtio est miscibilium, alteratorum, per minima coniunctorum, Vnio. Euery word in the definition, is of great importance. I nede not also spend any time, to shew, how, the other manner of distributing of degrees, doth agree to these Rules. Neither nede I of the farder vse belonging to the Crosse of Graduation (before described) in this place declare, vnto such as are capable of that, which I haue all ready sayd. Neither yet with examples specifie the Manifold varieties, by the foresayd two generall Rules, to be ordered. The witty and Studious, here, haue sufficient: And they which are not hable to atteine to this, without liuely teaching, and more in particular: would haue larger discoursing, then is mete in this place to be dealt withall: And other (perchaunce) with a proude snuffe will disdaine this litle: and would be vnthankefull for much more. I, therfore conclude: and wish such as haue modest and earnest Philosophicall mindes, to laude God highly for this: and to Meruayle, that the profoundest and subtilest point, concerning Mixture of Formes and Qualities Naturall, is so Matcht and maryed with the most simple, easie, and short way of the noble Rule of Algiebar. Who can remaine, therfore vnpersuaded, to loue, alow, and honor the excellent Science of Arithmetike? For, here, you may perceiue that the litle finger of Arithmetike, is of more might and contriuing, then a hunderd thousand mens wittes, of the middle sorte, are hable to perfourme, or truely to conclude, with out helpe thereof.

And even though I'm only talking about two things that can be mixed, there are usually more than three, four, five, or six, etc., that can be combined; and in one compound to be reduced, with the resulting form serving a purpose. These rules are enough when applied repeatedly and systematically. || As we begin with any two, we proceed with the resulting form, and then another, and so on. The final task concludes the resulting form of all of them. I don’t need to explain what mixture is here, as common philosophy has already defined it, stating, Mixtio est miscibilium, alteratorum, per minima coniunctorum, Unio. Every word in that definition is very significant. I also won’t spend time showing how other ways of distributing degrees fit these rules. Nor will I explain the further use related to the previously described Cross of Graduation in this context for those who are capable of understanding what I've already said. Additionally, I will not specify the many varieties that can be organized by the aforementioned two general rules. Those who are clever and studious will find enough here. Those who cannot grasp this without direct teaching and more specifics would need more elaborate explanations than are appropriate in this instance. Others might dismiss this little bit with disdain and would be ungrateful for much more. Therefore, I conclude and hope that those with modest and earnest philosophical minds will praise God for this and marvel that the deepest and most subtle point concerning Mixture of Formes and Qualities Naturall is so well aligned and combined with the simplest, easiest, and shortest method of the noble rule of Algebra. Who can, therefore, remain unconvinced to love, approve, and honor the excellent science of Arithmetic? Here, you can see that the little finger of Arithmetic is more powerful and capable than the wits of a hundred thousand average people, who can't achieve or conclude anything truly without its help.

Now will we farder, by the wise and valiant Capitaine, be certified, what helpe he hath, by the Rules of Arithmetike: in one of the Artes to him appertaining: And of the Grekes named Τακτικὴ. Τακτικὴ. That is, the Skill of Ordring Souldiers in Battell ray after the best maner to all purposes. This Art so much dependeth vppon Numbers vse, and the Mathematicals, that Ælianus (the best writer therof,) in his worke, to the Emperour Hadrianus, by his perfection, in the Mathematicals, (beyng greater, then other before him had,) thinketh his booke to passe all other the excellent workes, written of that Art, vnto his dayes. For, of it, had written Æneas: Cyneas of Thessaly: Pyrrhus Epirota: and Alexander his sonne: Clearchus: Pausanias: Euangelus: Polybius, familier frende to Scipio: Eupolemus: Iphicrates, Possidonius: and very many other worthy Capitaines, Philosophers and Princes of Immortall fame and memory: Whose fayrest floure of their garland (in this feat) was Arithmetike: and a litle perceiuerance, in Geometricall Figures. But in many other cases doth Arithmetike stand the Capitaine in great stede. As in proportionyng of vittayles, for the Army, either remaining at a stay: or suddenly to be encreased with a certaine number of Souldiers: and for a certain tyme. Or by good Art to diminish his company, to make the victuals, longer to serue the remanent, & for a certaine determined tyme: if nede so require. And so in sundry his other accountes, Reckeninges, Measurynges, and proportionynges, the wise, expert, and Circumspect Capitaine will affirme the Science of Arithmetike, to be one of his chief Counsaylors, directers and aiders. Which thing (by good meanes) was euident to the Noble, the Couragious, the loyall, and Curteous   Iohn, late Earle of Warwicke. Who was a yong Gentleman, throughly knowne to very few. Albeit his lusty valiantnes, force, and Skill in Chiualrous feates and exercises: his humblenes, and frendelynes to all men, were thinges, openly, of the world perceiued. But what rotes (otherwise,) vertue had fastened in his brest, what Rules of godly and honorable a.j life he had framed to him selfe: what vices, (in some then liuing) notable, he tooke great care to eschew: what manly vertues, in other noble men, (florishing before his eyes,) he Sythingly aspired after: what prowesses he purposed and ment to achieue: with what feats and Artes, he began to furnish and fraught him selfe, for the better seruice of his Kyng and Countrey, both in peace & warre. These (I say) his Heroicall Meditations, forecastinges and determinations, no twayne, (I thinke) beside my selfe, can so perfectly, and truely report. And therfore, in Conscience, I count it my part, for the honor, preferment, & procuring of vertue (thus, briefly) to haue put his Name, in the Register of Fame Immortall.

Now we will further, through the wise and brave Captain, find out what help he has, according to the Rules of Arithmetic: in one of the Arts that belong to him: And the Greeks named it Tactics. Tactics. That is, the skill of arranging soldiers in battle in the best way for all purposes.I’m sorry, but it seems that you haven’t provided any text to modernize. Please provide the short piece of text you’d like me to work on. This Art depends so much on the use of numbers and mathematics that Ælianus (the best writer on this subject) believed that his book, due to his superior skills in mathematics, surpassed all other excellent works written on this Art up to his time. For Æneas had written about it: Cyneas of Thessaly: Pyrrhus of Epirus: and Alexander, his son: Clearchus: Pausanias: Euangelus: Polybius, a close friend of Scipio: Eupolemus: Iphicrates: Possidonius: and many other worthy captains, philosophers, and princes of everlasting fame and memory: Whose finest quality in this field was Arithmetic: and a little perseverance in Geometric figures. But in many other situations, Arithmetic significantly benefits the Captain. Such as in calculating provisions for the Army, whether remaining stationary or suddenly increased by a certain number of soldiers for a certain period. Or, with good planning, reducing his company to make the food last longer for the remaining soldiers for a specific determined time, if needed. And so in various other accounts, calculations, measurements, and proportions, the wise, experienced, and cautious Captain will regard the Science of Arithmetic as one of his chief advisors, directors, and helpers. This was clearly evident to the noble, courageous, loyal, and courteous Iohn, the former Earl of Warwick. He was a young man, well-known to very few. Although his eager bravery, strength, and skill in chivalrous feats and exercises, along with his humility and friendliness to everyone, were things openly recognized by the world. But what deeper roots virtue had taken hold of in his heart, what rules of godly and honorable life he had framed for himself, what notable vices he took great care to avoid, what manly virtues he strived for in other noble men flourishing before his eyes, what great deeds he intended to accomplish, and what skills and arts he began to cultivate for the better service of his King and Country, both in peace and war. These, I think, no two people, aside from myself, can report so perfectly and truly. And therefore, in good conscience, I consider it my duty, for the honor, promotion, and advancement of virtue, to have placed his name in the Register of Fame Immortal.

To our purpose. This Iohn, by one of his actes (besides many other: both in England and Fraunce, by me, in him noted.) did disclose his harty loue to vertuous Sciences: and his noble intent, to excell in Martiall prowesse: When he, with humble request, and instant Solliciting: got the best Rules (either in time past by Greke or Romaine, or in our time vsed: and new Stratagemes therin deuised) for ordring of all Companies, summes and Numbers of mẽ, (Many, or few) with one kinde of weapon, or mo, appointed: with Artillery, or without: on horsebacke, or on fote: to giue, or take onset: to seem many, being few: to seem few, being many. To marche in battaile or Iornay: with many such feates, to Foughten field, Skarmoush, or Ambushe appartaining: This noble Earle, dyed Anno. 1554. skarse of 24. yeares of age: hauing no issue by his wife: Daughter to the Duke of Somerset. And of all these, liuely designementes (most curiously) to be in velame parchement described: with Notes & peculier markes, as the Arte requireth: and all these Rules, and descriptions Arithmeticall, inclosed in a riche Case of Gold, he vsed to weare about his necke: as his Iuell most precious, and Counsaylour most trusty. Thus, Arithmetike, of him, was shryned in gold: Of Numbers frute, he had good hope. Now, Numbers therfore innumerable, in Numbers prayse, his shryne shall finde.

To our purpose. This John, through one of his actions (among many others: both in England and France, as I’ve noted) showed his deep love for virtuous Sciences and his noble intention to excel in martial skills. He humbly requested and eagerly sought out the best methods (whether from the past by Greeks or Romans, or those used in our time, along with new strategies devised) for organizing all types of groups, numbers of men (whether many or few), using one type of weapon or more, with artillery or without, on horseback or on foot, to launch or receive an attack, to appear numerous while being few, or to appear few while being numerous. To march in battle or as part of a campaign, with many such skills, pertaining to fighting in the field, skirmishes, or ambushes: This noble Earl passed away in 1554 at just 24 years old, without any children from his wife, who was the daughter of the Duke of Somerset. And all of these lively designs (most carefully) were described on fine parchment, with notes and special markings, as the Art demands: and all these rules and arithmetic descriptions, enclosed in a rich gold case, he used to wear around his neck as his most precious jewel and most trusted advisor. Thus, Arithmetic was enshrined in gold because of him: From Numbers fruits, he had great hope. Now, therefore, countless praises for Numbers will find his shrine.

What nede I, (for farder profe to you) of the Scholemasters of Iustice, to require testimony: how nedefull, how frutefull, how skillfull a thing Arithmetike is? I meane, the Lawyers of all sortes. Vndoubtedly, the Ciuilians, can meruaylously declare: how, neither the Auncient Romaine lawes, without good knowledge of Numbers art, can be perceiued: Nor (Iustice in infinite Cases) without due proportion, (narrowly considered,) is hable to be executed. How Iustly, & with great knowledge of Arte, did Papinianus institute a law of partition, and allowance, betwene man and wife after a diuorce? But how Accursius, Baldus, Bartolus, Iason, Alexander, and finally Alciatus, (being otherwise, notably well learned) do iumble, gesse, and erre, from the æquity, art and Intent of the lawmaker: Arithmetike can detect, and conuince: and clerely, make the truth to shine. Good Bartolus, tyred in the examining & proportioning of the matter: and with Accursius Glosse, much cumbred: burst out, and sayd: Nulla est in toto libro, hac glossa difficilior: Cuius computationem nec Scholastici nec Doctores intelligunt. &c. That is: In the whole booke, there is no Glosse harder then this: Whose accoumpt or reckenyng, neither the Scholers, nor the Doctours vnderstand. &c. What can they say of Iulianus law, Si ita Scriptum. &c. Of the Testators will iustly performing, betwene the wife, Sonne and daughter? How can they perceiue the æquitie of Aphricanus, Arithmeticall Reckening, where he treateth of Lex Falcidia? How can they deliuer him, from his Reprouers: and their maintainers: as Ioannes, Accursius Hypolitus and Alciatus? How Iustly and artificially, was Africanus reckening made? Proportionating to the Sommes bequeathed, the Contributions of eche part? Namely, for the hundred presently receiued, 17 1/7. And for the hundred, receiued after ten monethes, 12 6/7: which make the 30: which were to be cõtributed by the legataries to the heire. || For, what proportion, 100 hath to 75: the same hath 17 1/7 to 12 6/7: Which is Sesquitertia: that is, as 4, to 3. which make 7. Wonderfull many places, in the Ciuile law, require an expert Arithmeticien, to vnderstand the deepe Iudgemẽt, & Iust determinatiõ of the Auncient Romaine Lawmakers. But much more expert ought he to be, who should be hable, to decide with æquitie, the infinite varietie of Cases, which do, or may happen, vnder euery one of those lawes and ordinances Ciuile. Hereby, easely, ye may now coniecture: that in the Canon law: and in the lawes of the Realme (which with vs, beare the chief Authoritie), Iustice and equity might be greately preferred, and skilfully executed, through due skill of Arithmetike, and proportions appertainyng. The worthy Philosophers, and prudent lawmakers (who haue written many bookes De Republica: How the best state of Common wealthes might be procured and mainteined,) haue very well determined of Iustice: (which, not onely, is the Base and foundacion of Common weales: but also the totall perfection of all our workes, words, and thoughtes:) defining it, Iustice. to be that vertue, by which, to euery one, is rendred, that to him appertaineth. God challengeth this at our handes, to be honored as God: to be loued, as a father: to be feared as a Lord & master. Our neighbours proportiõ, is also prescribed of the Almighty lawmaker: which is, to do to other, euen as we would be done vnto. These proportions, are in Iustice necessary: in duety, commendable: and of Common wealthes, the life, strength, stay and florishing. Aristotle in his Ethikes (to fatch the sede of Iustice, and light of direction, to vse and execute the same) was fayne to fly to the perfection, and power of Numbers: for proportions Arithmeticall and Geometricall. Plato in his booke called Epinomis (which boke, is the Threasury of all his doctrine) where, his purpose is, to seke a Science, which, when a man had it, perfectly: he might seme, and so be, in dede, Wise. He, briefly, of other Sciences discoursing, findeth them, not hable to bring it to passe: But of the Science of Numbers, he sayth. Illa, quæ numerum mortalium generi dedit, id profecto efficiet. Deum autem aliquem, magis quam fortunam, ad salutem nostram, hoc munus nobis arbitror contulisse. &c. Nam ipsum bonorum omnium Authorem, cur non maximi boni, Prudentiæ dico, causam arbitramur? That Science, verely, which hath taught mankynde number, shall be able to bryng it to passe. And, I thinke, a certaine God, rather then fortune, to haue giuen vs this gift, for our blisse. For, why should we not Iudge him, who is the Author of all good things, to be also the cause of the greatest good thyng, namely, Wisedome? There, at length, he proueth Wisedome to be atteyned, by good Skill of Numbers. With which great Testimony, and the manifold profes, and reasons, before expressed, you may be sufficiently and fully persuaded: of the perfect Science of Arithmetike, to make this accounte: That   of all Sciences, next to Theologie, it is most diuine, most pure, most ample and generall, most profounde, most subtile, most commodious and most necessary. Whose next Sister, is the Absolute Science of Magnitudes: of which (by the Direction and aide of him, whose Magnitude is Infinite, and of vs Incomprehensible) I now entend, so to write, that both with the Multitude, and also with the Magnitude of Meruaylous and frutefull verities, you (my frendes and Countreymen) may be stird vp, and awaked, to behold what certaine Artes and Sciences, (to our vnspeakable behofe) our heauenly father, hath for vs prepared, and reuealed, by sundry Philosophers and Mathematiciens.

What do I need, (for further proof to you) from the schoolmasters of justice, to request testimony: how essential, how beneficial, how skilled a thing Arithmetic is? I mean, the lawyers of all kinds. Undoubtedly, the Civil lawyers can marvelously explain: how neither the ancient Roman laws, without a good knowledge of Numbers art, can be understood: Nor (justice in infinite cases) without proper proportion, (carefully considered,) can be executed. How justly, & with great knowledge of the art, did Papinianus establish a law of division and allowance between husband and wife after a divorce? But how Accursius, Baldus, Bartolus, Iason, Alexander, and finally Alciatus, (being otherwise notably well learned) fumble, guess, and err, from the equity, art, and intent of the lawmaker: Arithmetic can detect, and convince: and clearly make the truth shine. Good Bartolus, tired from examining & proportioning the matter: and much burdened by Accursius's gloss: burst out, and said: Nulla est in toto libro, hac glossa difficilior: Cuius computationem nec Scholastici nec Doctores intelligunt. &c. That is: Throughout the entire book, there isn't a more challenging point than this: Whose story or calculation neither the scholars nor the doctors comprehend. &c. What can they say of Iulianus' law, Si ita Scriptum. &c. Of the testator's will justly performing, between the wife, son, and daughter? How can they perceive the equity of Aphricanus, Arithmetic Reckoning, where he discusses Lex Falcidia? How can they defend him from his reproachful critics and their supporters: like Ioannes, Accursius Hypolitus, and Alciatus? How justly and skillfully was Africanus' reckoning made? Proportioning the sums bequeathed, the contributions of each part? Namely, for the hundred currently received, 17 1/7. And for the hundred, received after ten months, 12 6/7: which make the 30: which were to be contributed by the legatees to the heir. || For, what proportion, 100 has to 75: the same has 17 1/7 to 12 6/7: Which is Sesquitertia: that is, as 4 to 3, which makes 7. Many places in the Civil law require an expert Arithmetician, to understand the deep judgment, & just determination of the ancient Roman lawmakers. But much more expert ought he to be, who should be able to decide with equity, the infinite variety of cases, which do or may happen, under every one of those laws and civil ordinances. Hereby, easily, you may now conjecture: that in the Canon law: and in the laws of the realm (which with us, bear the chief authority), justice and equity might be greatly preferred and skillfully executed, through due skill of Arithmetic and the proper proportions involved. The worthy philosophers and prudent lawmakers (who have written many books De Republica: How the best state of commonwealths might be procured and maintained,) have very well defined justice: (which, not only is the base and foundation of commonwealths: but also the total perfection of all our works, words, and thoughts:) defining it, Fairness. to be that virtue, by which, to everyone, is rendered, that which is due to him.It seems there is no text provided. Please provide a phrase for modernization. God demands this from us, to be honored as God: to be loved, as a father: to be feared as a Lord & master. Our neighbor's proportion is also prescribed by the Almighty lawmaker: which is, to do to others, even as we would have done to us. These proportions are in justice necessary: in duty, commendable: and for commonwealths, the life, strength, support, and flourishing. Aristotle in his Ethics (to grasp the essence of justice, and the light of direction, to use and execute the same) was compelled to rely on the perfection and power of numbers: for both arithmetic and geometric proportions. Plato in his book called Epinomis (which book, is the treasury of all his doctrine) where his purpose is to seek a science, which, when a man possesses it perfectly, he might seem, and thus be, in fact, Wise. He, briefly, while discussing other sciences, finds them unable to achieve it: But of the science of numbers, he says. Illa, quæ numerum mortalium generi dedit, id profecto efficiet. Deum autem aliquem, magis quam fortunam, ad salutem nostram, hoc munus nobis arbitror contulisse. &c. Nam ipsum bonorum omnium Authorem, cur non maximi boni, Prudentiæ dico, causam arbitramur? The science that has truly taught humanity about numbers will certainly make things happen. I believe that a certain God, rather than luck, has given us this gift for our happiness. After all, why shouldn't we consider Him, the creator of all good things, to also be the source of the greatest good, which is Wisdom? There, in the end, he proves Wisdom to be attained by good skill of Numbers. With this great testimony, and the various proofs, and reasons previously stated, you may be sufficiently and fully persuaded: of the perfect science of Arithmetic, to make this account: That of all sciences, next to Theology, it is the most divine, most pure, most ample and general, most profound, most subtle, most useful and most necessary. Whose next sister is the absolute science of Magnitudes: of which (by the direction and aid of him, whose Magnitude is infinite, and of us incomprehensible) I now intend to write, so that both with the Multitude, and also with the Magnitude of marvelous and fruitful truths, you (my friends and countrymen) may be stirred up and awakened, to behold what certain arts and sciences, (to our unspeakable benefit) our heavenly father has prepared for us, and revealed, by various Philosophers and Mathematicians.

Both, Number and Magnitude, haue a certaine Originall sede, (as it were) of an incredible property: and of man, neuer hable, Fully, to be declared. Of Number, an Vnit, and of Magnitude, a Poynte, doo seeme to be much like Originall a.ij causes: But the diuersitie neuerthelesse, is great. We defined an Vnit, to be a thing Mathematicall Indiuisible: A Point, likewise, we sayd to be a Mathematicall thing Indiuisible. And farder, that a Point may haue a certaine determined Situation: that is, that we may assigne, and prescribe a Point, to be here, there, yonder. &c. Herein, (behold) our Vnit is free, and can abyde no bondage, or to be tyed to any place, or seat: diuisible or indiuisible. Agayne, by reason, a Point may haue a Situation limited to him: a certaine motion, therfore (to a place, and from a place) is to a Point incident and appertainyng. But an Vnit, can not be imagined to haue any motion. A Point, by his motion, produceth, Mathematically, a line: (as we sayd before) which is the first kinde of Magnitudes, and most simple: An Vnit, can not produce any number. A Line, though it be produced of a Point moued, yet, it doth not consist of pointes: Number, though it be not produced of an Vnit, yet doth it Consist of vnits, as a materiall cause. But formally, Number. Number, is the Vnion, and Vnitie of Vnits. Which vnyting and knitting, is the workemanship of our minde: which, of distinct and discrete Vnits, maketh a Number: by vniformitie, resulting of a certaine multitude of Vnits. And so, euery number, may haue his least part, giuen: namely, an Vnit: But not of a Magnitude, (no, not of a Lyne,) the least part can be giuẽ: by cause, infinitly, diuision therof, may be conceiued. All Magnitude, is either a Line, a Plaine, or a Solid. Which Line, Plaine, or Solid, of no Sense, can be perceiued, nor exactly by hãd (any way) represented: nor of Nature produced: But, as (by degrees) Number did come to our perceiuerance: So, by visible formes, we are holpen to imagine, what our Line Mathematicall, is. What our Point, is. So precise, are our Magnitudes, that one Line is no broader then an other: for they haue no bredth: Nor our Plaines haue any thicknes. Nor yet our Bodies, any weight: be they neuer so large of dimensiõ. Our Bodyes, we can haue Smaller, then either Arte or Nature can produce any: and Greater also, then all the world can comprehend. Our least Magnitudes, can be diuided into so many partes, as the greatest. As, a Line of an inch long, (with vs) may be diuided into as many partes, as may the diameter of the whole world, from East to West: or any way extended: What priuiledges, aboue all manual Arte, and Natures might, haue our two Sciences Mathematicall? to exhibite, and to deale with thinges of such power, liberty, simplicity, puritie, and perfection? And in them, so certainly, so orderly, so precisely to procede: as, excellent is that workemã Mechanicall Iudged, who nerest can approche to the representing of workes, Mathematically demonstrated?   And our two Sciences, remaining pure, and absolute, in their proper termes, and in their owne Matter: to haue, and allowe, onely such Demonstrations, as are plaine, certaine, vniuersall, and of an æternall veritye? Geometrie. This Science of Magnitude, his properties, conditions, and appertenances: commonly, now is, and from the beginnyng, hath of all Philosophers, ben called Geometrie. But, veryly, with a name to base and scant, for a Science of such dignitie and amplenes. And, perchaunce, that name, by cõmon and secret consent, of all wisemen, hitherto hath ben suffred to remayne: that it might carry with it a perpetuall memorye, of the first and notablest benefite, by that Science, to common people shewed: Which was, when Boundes and meres of land and ground were lost, and confounded (as in Egypt, yearely, with the ouerflowyng of Nilus, the greatest and longest riuer in the world) or, that ground bequeathed, were to be assigned: or, ground sold, were to be layd out: or (when disorder preuailed) that Commõs were distributed into seueralties. For, where, vpon these & such like occasiõs, Some by ignorãce, some by negligẽce, Some by fraude, and some by violence, did wrongfully limite, measure, encroach, or challenge (by || pretence of iust content, and measure) those landes and groundes: great losse, disquietnes, murder, and warre did (full oft) ensue: Till, by Gods mercy, and mans Industrie, The perfect Science of Lines, Plaines, and Solides (like a diuine Iusticier,) gaue vnto euery man, his owne. The people then, by this art pleasured, and greatly relieued, in their landes iust measuring: & other Philosophers, writing Rules for land measuring: betwene them both, thus, confirmed the name of Geometria, that is, (according to the very etimologie of the word) Land measuring. Wherin, the people knew no farder, of Magnitudes vse, but in Plaines: and the Philosophers, of thẽ, had no feet hearers, or Scholers: farder to disclose vnto, then of flat, plaine Geometrie. And though, these Philosophers, knew of farder vse, and best vnderstode the etymologye of the worde, yet this name Geometria, was of them applyed generally to all sortes of Magnitudes: vnleast, otherwhile, of Plato, and Pythagoras: When they would precisely declare their owne doctrine. Then, was * Plato. 7. de Rep. *Geometria, with them, Studium quod circa planum versatur. But, well you may perceiue by Euclides Elementes, that more ample is our Science, then to measure Plaines: and nothyng lesse therin is tought (of purpose) then how to measure Land. An other name, therfore, must nedes be had, for our Mathematicall Science of Magnitudes: which regardeth neither clod, nor turff: neither hill, nor dale: neither earth nor heauen: but is absolute Megethologia: not creping on ground, and dasseling the eye, with pole perche, rod or lyne: but liftyng the hart aboue the heauens, by inuisible lines, and   immortall beames meteth with the reflexions, of the light incomprehensible: and so procureth Ioye, and perfection vnspeakable. Of which true vse of our Megethica, or Megethologia, Diuine Plato seemed to haue good taste, and iudgement: and (by the name of Geometrie) so noted it: and warned his Scholers therof: as, in hys seuenth Dialog, of the Common wealth, may euidently be sene. Where (in Latin) thus it is: right well translated: Profecto, nobis hoc non negabunt, Quicunque vel paululum quid Geometriæ gustârunt, quin hæc Scientia, contrà, omnino se habeat, quàm de ea loquuntur, qui in ipsa versantur. In English, thus. Verely (sayth Plato) whosoeuer haue, (but euen very litle) tasted of Geometrie, will not denye vnto vs, this: but that this Science, is of an other condicion, quite contrary to that, which they that are exercised in it, do speake of it. And there it followeth, of our Geometrie, Quòd quæritur cognoscendi illius gratia, quod semper est, non & eius quod oritur quandoque & interit. Geometria, eius quod est semper, Cognitio est. Attollet igitur (ô Generose vir) ad Veritatem, animum: atque ita, ad Philosophandum preparabit cogitationem, vt ad supera conuertamus: quæ, nunc, contra quàm decet, ad inferiora deijcimus. &c. Quàm maximè igitur præcipiendum est, vt qui præclarissimam hanc habitãt Civitatem, nullo modo, Geometriam spernant. Nam & quæ præter ipsius propositum, quodam modo esse videntur, haud exigua sunt. &c. It must nedes be confessed (saith Plato) That [Geometrie] is learned, for the knowyng of that, which is euer: and not of that, which, in tyme, both is bred and is brought to an ende. &c. Geometrie is the knowledge of that which is euerlastyng. It will lift vp therfore (O Gentle Syr) our mynde to the Veritie: and by that meanes, it will prepare the Thought, to the Philosophicall loue of wisdome: that we may turne or conuert, toward heauenly thinges [both mynde and thought] which now, otherwise then becommeth vs, we cast down on base or inferior things. &c. Chiefly, therfore, Commaundement must be giuen, that such as do inhabit this most honorable Citie, by no meanes, despise Geometrie. For euen those thinges [done by it] which, in manner, seame to be, beside the purpose of Geometrie: are of a.iij no small importance. &c. And besides the manifold vses of Geometrie, in matters appertainyng to warre, he addeth more, of second vnpurposed frute, and commoditye, arrising by Geometrie: saying: Scimus quin etiam, ad Disciplinas omnes facilius per discendas, interesse omnino, attigerit ne Geometriam aliquis, an non. &c. Hanc ergo Doctrinam, secundo loco discendam Iuuenibus statuamus. That is. But, also, we know, that for the more easy learnyng of all Artes, it importeth much, whether one haue any knowledge in Geometrie, or no. &c. Let vs therfore make an ordinance or decree, that this Science, of young men shall be learned in the second place. This was Diuine Plato his Iudgement, both of the purposed, chief, and perfect vse of Geometrie: and of his second, dependyng, deriuatiue commodities. And for vs, Christen men, a thousand thousand mo occasions are, to haue nede of the helpe of* I. D.
* Herein, I would gladly shake of, the earthly name, of Geometrie.
Megethologicall Contemplations: wherby, to trayne our Imaginations and Myndes, by litle and litle, to forsake and abandon, the grosse and corruptible Obiectes, of our vtward senses: and to apprehend, by sure doctrine demonstratiue, Things Mathematicall. And by them, readily to be holpen and conducted to conceiue, discourse, and conclude of things Intellectual, Spirituall, æternall, and such as concerne our Blisse euerlasting: which, otherwise (without Speciall priuiledge of Illumination, or Reuelation frõ heauen) No mortall mans wyt (naturally) is hable to reach vnto, or to Compasse. And, veryly, by my small Talent (from aboue) I am hable to proue and testifie, that the litterall Text, and order of our diuine Law, Oracles, and Mysteries, require more skill in Numbers, and Magnitudes: then (commonly) the expositors haue vttered: but rather onely (at the most) so warned: & shewed their own want therin. (To name any, is nedeles: and to note the places, is, here, no place: But if I be duely asked, my answere is ready.) And without the litterall, Grammaticall, Mathematicall or Naturall verities of such places, by good and certaine Arte, perceiued, no Spirituall sense (propre to those places, by Absolute Theologie) will thereon depend.   No man, therfore, can doute, but toward the atteyning of knowledge incomparable, and Heauenly Wisedome: Mathematicall Speculations, both of Numbers and Magnitudes: are meanes, aydes, and guides: ready, certaine, and necessary. From henceforth, in this my Preface, will I frame my talke, to Plato his fugitiue Scholers: or, rather, to such, who well can, (and also wil,) vse their vtward senses, to the glory of God, the benefite of their Countrey, and their owne secret contentation, or honest preferment, on this earthly Scaffold. To them, I will orderly recite, describe & declare a great Number of Artes, from our two Mathematicall fountaines, deriued into the fieldes of Nature. Wherby, such Sedes, and Rotes, as lye depe hyd in the groũd of Nature, are refreshed, quickened, and prouoked to grow, shote vp, floure, and giue frute, infinite, and incredible. And these Artes, shalbe such, as vpon Magnitudes properties do depende, more, then vpon Number. And by good reason we may call them Artes, and Artes Mathematicall Deriuatiue: for (at this tyme) I Define An Arte. An Arte, to be a Methodicall cõplete Doctrine, hauing abundancy of sufficient, and peculier matter to deale with, by the allowance of the Metaphisicall Philosopher: the knowledge whereof, to humaine state is necessarye. And that I account, Art Mathematicall Deriuatiue. An Art Mathematicall deriuatiue, which by Mathematicall demonstratiue Method, in Nũbers, or Magnitudes, ordreth and confirmeth his doctrine, as much & as perfectly, as the matter subiect will admit. And for that, || I entend to vse the name and propertie of a A Mechanitien. Mechanicien, otherwise, then (hitherto) it hath ben vsed, I thinke it good, (for distinction sake) to giue you also a brief description, what I meane therby. A Mechanicien, or a Mechanicall workman is he, whose skill is, without knowledge of Mathematicall demonstration, perfectly to worke and finishe any sensible worke, by the Mathematicien principall or deriuatiue, demonstrated or demonstrable. Full well I know, that he which inuenteth, or maketh these demonstrations, is generally called A speculatiue Mechanicien: which differreth nothyng from a Mechanicall Mathematicien. So, in respect of diuerse actions, one man may haue the name of sundry artes: as, some tyme, of a Logicien, some tymes (in the same matter otherwise handled) of a Rethoricien. Of these trifles, I make, (as now, in respect of my Preface,) small account: to fyle thẽ for the fine handlyng of subtile curious disputers. In other places, they may commaunde me, to giue good reason: and yet, here, I will not be vnreasonable.

Both Number and Magnitude have a certain original base (as it were) with an incredible quality that cannot fully be explained by man. Of Number, a Unit, and of Magnitude, a Point, seem to have very similar original causes: However, the differences are significant. We define a Unit as a mathematically indivisible thing; likewise, we say that a Point is also a mathematically indivisible thing. Furthermore, a Point can have a determined Position: that is, we can assign and designate a Point to be here, there, over yonder, etc. In this regard, our Unit is free and cannot abide any bondage or be tied to any specific location, whether divisible or indivisible. Again, due to its nature, a Point can have a defined Position; thus, a certain motion (to a place, and from a place) is inherent and applicable to a Point. However, an Unit cannot be imagined to possess any motion. A Point, through its motion, mathematically produces a line (as we stated before), which is the simplest and first type of Magnitude. An Unit cannot produce any number. A Line, even though produced by a moving Point, does not consist of Points; Number, though it is not produced by a Unit, does consist of units as a material cause. But formally, Number. Number is the unity and oneness of Units. This uniting and binding is the work of our mind, which takes distinct and discrete Units and creates a Number through uniformity, arising from a certain multitude of Units. Therefore, every number can have its least part assigned, namely, a Unit: But no part of a Magnitude (not even of a Line) can be assigned as the least part because it can infinitely be divided. All Magnitudes can be a Line, a Plane, or a Solid. No sense can perceive, nor can they be precisely represented by hand (in any way), nor are they produced by Nature. However, just as Number gradually came to our understanding, so by visible forms, we can help ourselves imagine what our mathematical Line is. What our Point is. So precise are our Magnitudes that one Line is no broader than another because they have no width. Nor do our Planes have any thickness. Nor do our Bodies have any weight, no matter how large their dimensions. Our Bodies can be smaller than anything Art or Nature can produce, and larger than anything the entire world can comprehend. Our smallest Magnitudes can be divided into as many parts as the largest. For example, a Line that is an inch long can be divided into as many parts as can the diameter of the whole world, whether from East to West or any other direction. What privileges, above all manual Art and the might of Nature, do our two Mathematical Sciences have? To exhibit and deal with things of such power, freedom, simplicity, purity, and perfection? And in them, to proceed so certainly, so orderly, and so precisely: as that mechanical workman is judged excellent, who can most closely approach representing works that are mathematically proven? And our two Sciences, remaining pure and absolute in their proper terms and in their own Matter, should only acknowledge such Demonstrations as are clear, certain, universal, and of eternal truth. Geometry. This Science of Magnitude, its properties, conditions, and attachments is now, and has been from the beginning, called Geometrie by all Philosophers. But, it truly deserves a name much more dignified and expansive. Perhaps this name, by common and secret consent of all wise men, has thus far persisted so that it may carry a perpetual memory of the first and most notable benefit that Science provided to the common people: which was when the boundaries and borders of land were lost and confused (as in Egypt, yearly, with the flooding of the Nilus, the greatest and longest river in the world), or when land bequeathed needed to be assigned, or land sold needed to be laid out, or (when disorder prevailed) that Commons were divided into individual properties. For, in these and similar cases, some due to ignorance, some due to negligence, some due to fraud, and some due to violence, wrongfully limited, measured, encroached upon, or claimed (under the pretense of just content and measurement) those lands and properties: great loss, unrest, murder, and war often ensued. Until, by God's mercy and human industry, the perfect Science of Lines, Planes, and Solids (like a divine Justiciar) gave to every man his own. The people then, through this art, found pleasure and great relief in justly measuring their land: and other Philosophers wrote Rules for land measurement: thus, between them both, the name of Geometria was confirmed, which means, according to the very etymology of the word, Land measuring. In which, the people knew no further use of Magnitudes than in Planes: and the Philosophers had no audience or students to disclose more of than flat, plain Geometrie. And although these Philosophers were aware of further uses and best understood the etymology of the word, yet this name Geometria was generalised to refer to all sorts of Magnitudes: unless other times, specifically by Plato and Pythagoras, when they wanted to precisely declare their own doctrine. Then, was * Plato. 7. on the Republic. * Geometria was, with them, Studium quod circa planum versatur. But, you can see well through Euclides Elementes, that our Science is more extensive than merely measuring Planes; and nothing less is taught (on purpose) than how to measure Land. Therefore, another name must necessarily be established for our Mathematical Science of Magnitudes: which concerns neither clod nor turf; neither hill nor valley; neither earth nor heaven: but is absolute Megethologia: not creeping on the ground and dazzling the eye with pole perch, rod, or line: but lifting the heart above the heavens, by invisible lines, and immortal beams intersects with the reflections of incomprehensible light: and thus brings about joy and unspeakable perfection."” Of which true use of our Megethica, or Megethologia, Diuine Plato seemed to have a good sense and judgment: and (by the name of Geometrie) so noted it: and warned his Scholars of this, as seen in his seventh Dialog of the Commonwealth. Where (in Latin) it is thus: rightly translated: Profecto, nobis hoc non negabunt, Quicunque vel paululum quid Geometriæ gustârunt, quin hæc Scientia, contrà, omnino se habeat, quàm de ea loquuntur, qui in ipsa versantur. In English, thus. Absolutely (says Plato) Anyone who has even a bit of a feel for Geometry won't deny this: this Science is completely different from what those who study it claim. And there it follows, of our Geometrie, Quòd quæritur cognoscendi illius gratia, quod semper est, non & eius quod oritur quandoque & interit. Geometria, eius quod est semper, Cognitio est. Attollet igitur (ô Generose vir) ad Veritatem, animum: atque ita, ad Philosophandum preparabit cogitationem, vt ad supera conuertamus: quæ, nunc, contra quàm decet, ad inferiora deijcimus. &c. Quàm maximè igitur præcipiendum est, vt qui præclarissimam hanc habitãt Civitatem, nullo modo, Geometriam spernant. Nam & quæ præter ipsius propositum, quodam modo esse videntur, haud exigua sunt. &c. It must certainly be confessed (says Plato) That [Geometry] is understood for the knowledge of what is eternal, not for what is born and expires in time. Geometrical knowledge is about what is timeless. It will elevate our minds to the Truth, thus preparing our thoughts for the philosophical pursuit of wisdom, allowing us to turn towards heavenly matters. both mind and thought which now, unlike how we should, we focus on low or unworthy things. &c. Therefore, we must especially ensure that those living in this esteemed City do not underestimate Geometry. For even those things [done by it] which, in nature, appear to be unrelated to the purpose of Geometry: are of a.iij not insignificant. &c. And besides the many uses of Geometrie in matters pertaining to war, he adds more about second unexpected benefits and usefulness arising from Geometrie: saying: Scimus quin etiam, ad Disciplinas omnes facilius per discendas, interesse omnino, attigerit ne Geometriam aliquis, an non. &c. Hanc ergo Doctrinam, secundo loco discendam Iuuenibus statuamus. That is. But we also know that for easier learning of all subjects, it’s important whether someone has any knowledge of Geometry or not. Therefore, let’s agree that this subject should be taught to young people as a second priority. This was Diuine Plato his judgment, both of the intended, chief, and perfect use of Geometrie: and of his second, dependent, derivative benefits. And for us, Christian men, there are thousands of other reasons to need the help of* I. D.
* Here, I would happily cast aside the earthly name of Geometry.
Megethologicall Contemplations: whereby to train our Imaginations and Minds, little by little, to forsake and abandon the gross and corruptible objects of our outward senses: and to grasp, through sure demonstrative doctrine, Mathematical Things. And by them, we can easily be aided and guided to conceive, discourse, and conclude on Intellectual, Spiritual, eternal things, and matters concerning our everlasting Bliss: which, without the special privilege of Illumination or Revelation from heaven, no mortal man's wit (naturally) is able to reach or comprehend. And, truly, by my small Talent (from above) I can prove and testify that the literal Text, and order of our divine Law, Oracles, and Mysteries require more skill in Numbers and Magnitudes than (commonly) the expositors have articulated: but rather have only, at most, warned and shown their own lack therein. (To name any is unnecessary, and to note the places is, here, no place: But if I am duly asked, my answer is ready.) And without the literal, grammatical, mathematical, or natural truths of such places, perceived by good and certain Art, no Spiritual sense (specific to those places through Absolute Theologie) will depend on them. No one can doubt that towards attaining incomparable knowledge and Heavenly Wisdom: Mathematical Speculations, both of Numbers and Magnitudes, are means, aids, and guides: ready, certain, and necessary. Henceforth, in this my Preface, I will direct my talk to Plato’s fugitive Scholars: or rather, to those who can well (and will) use their external senses, to the glory of God, the benefit of their Country, and their own personal satisfaction or honorable advancement on this earthly stage. To them, I will orderly recite, describe, and declare a great number of arts, derived from our two Mathematical fountains, into the fields of Nature. Thus, such Seats and Roots, as lie deep hidden in the ground of Nature, are refreshed, revitalized, and urged to grow, shoot up, flower, and yield infinite and incredible fruits. And these Arts will be such that depend more on the properties of Magnitudes than on Number. And by good reason, we may call them Arts, and Mathematically Derivative Arts: for (at this time) I Define An Art. An art is a systematic and comprehensive doctrine that has a wealth of specific and adequate material to work with, according to the standards of the Metaphysical Philosopher: understanding this is essential for the human condition. And that I account, Art Mathematical Derivative. A Mathematically Derivative Art organizes and validates its principles using mathematical methods, in numbers or measurements, as thoroughly and accurately as the topic permits. And for that, || I intend to use the name and property of a A Mechanic. Mechanicien, differently than it has been used hitherto, I think it good, (for distinction sake) to provide you with a brief description of what I mean by that. A Mechanicien, or mechanical worker, is someone who skillfully completes any physical task without needing to rely on mathematical proofs or the principles established by mathematicians. I fully recognize that the one who invents or creates these demonstrations is generally called A speculative Mechanicien: which does not differ at all from a Mechanical Mathematicien. Therefore, regarding different actions, one person may be known by various Arts: sometimes as a Logician, sometimes (in the same matter viewed differently) as a Rhetorician. I pay little regard to these trifles (as of now, in respect to my Preface): to simply polish them for the clever handling of subtle, curious disputants. In other instances, they may command me to provide good reason: and yet, here, I will not be unreasonable.

1. First, then, from the puritie, absolutenes, and Immaterialitie of Principall Geometrie, is that kinde of Geometrie deriued, which vulgarly is counted Geometrie: and is the Arte of Measuring sensible magnitudes, their iust quãtities and contentes. Geometrie vulgar. This, teacheth to measure, either at hand: and the practiser, to be by the thing Measured: and so, by due applying of Cumpase, Rule, Squire, Yarde, Ell, Perch, Pole, Line, Gaging rod, (or such like instrument) to the Length, Plaine, or Solide measured, 1. *to be certified, either of the length, perimetry, or distance lineall: and this is called, Mecometrie. Or 2. *to be certified of the content of any plaine Superficies: whether it be in ground Surueyed, Borde, or Glasse measured, or such like thing: which measuring, is named Embadometrie. 3. *Or els to vnderstand the Soliditie, and content of any bodily thing: as of Tymber and Stone, or the content of Pits, Pondes, Wells, Vessels, small & great, of all fashions. Where, of Wine, Oyle, Beere, or Ale vessells, &c, the Measuring, commonly, hath a peculier name: and is called Gaging. And the generall name of these Solide measures, is Stereometrie. 2. Or els, this vulgar Geometrie, hath consideration to teach the practiser, how to measure things, with good distance betwene him and the thing measured: and to vnderstand thereby, either 1. *how Farre, a thing seene (on land or water) is from the measurer: and this may be called Apomecometrie: 2. Or, how High or depe, aboue or vnder the leuel of the measurers stãding, any thing is, which is sene on land or water, called Hypsometrie. 3. *Or, it informeth the measurer, how Broad any thing is, which is in the measurers vew: so it be on Land or Water, situated: and may be called Platometrie. Though I vse here to condition, the thing measured, to be on Land, or Water Situated: Note. yet, know for certaine, that the sundry heigthe of Cloudes, blasing Starres, and of the Mone, may (by these meanes) haue their distances from the earth: and, of the blasing Starres and Mone, the Soliditie (aswell as distances) to be measured: But because, neither these things are vulgarly taught: nor of a common practiser so ready to be executed: I, rather, let such measures be reckened incident to some of our other Artes, dealing with thinges on high, more purposely, then this vulgar Land measuring Geometrie doth: as in Perspectiue and Astronomie, &c.

1. First, then, from the purity, completeness, and immateriality of Principal Geometry, comes the kind of Geometry that is commonly known as Geometry: and is the The process of measuring physical dimensions, their precise amounts, and areas. Vulgar Geometry. This teaches how to measure, either directly or practically, being next to the thing measured. By properly using tools like compasses, rulers, squares, yards, ell, perch, pole, line, or any similar instruments to measure the length, area, or solid being measured, Please provide the short piece of text you would like me to modernize. *to confirm either the length, perimeter, or linear distance: and this is called Mecometria. Or 2. *to confirm the area of any flat surface, whether it be land surveyed, a border, or glass measured, or something similar: this type of measurement is called Embadometria. 3. *Or to understand the volume and content of any physical object, like timber and stone, or the volume of pits, ponds, wells, containers, large and small, of all shapes. For wine, oil, beer, or ale vessels, this measurement is usually called Gaging. The general term for these solid measurements is Stereometria. 2. Alternatively, this vulgar Geometry has the purpose of teaching the practitioner how to measure things from a good distance away from the item being measured, allowing them to understand either 1. *how far a visible object (on land or water) is from the measurer: this can be referred to as Apomecometria: 2. *Or, how high or deep, above or below the level where the measurer is standing, any visible thing is on land or water, called Hypsometrie. 3. *Or, it informs the measurer how wide an object is within their view, whether it's situated on land or water, and this can be called Platometrie. Although I condition the measured object to be on land or water, Note. be aware that the varying heights of clouds, shooting stars, and the moon can (by these methods) have their distances from the earth calculated; and the solidity (as well as distances) of shooting stars and the moon can be measured. However, since these things are neither commonly taught nor easily executed by an average practitioner, I shall consider such measurements as part of other arts that deal with high objects, more appropriately than this vulgar land measuring geometry does, as in Perspective and Astronomy, etc.

OF these Feates (farther applied) is Sprong the Feate of Geodesie, or Land Measuring: more cunningly to measure & Suruey Land, Woods, and Waters, a farre of. More cunningly, I say: But God knoweth (hitherto) in these Realmes of England and Ireland (whether through ignorance or fraude, I can not tell, in euery particular) Note. how great wrong and iniurie hath (in my time) bene committed a.iij by vntrue measuring and surueying of Land or Woods, any way. And, this I am sure: that the Value of the difference, betwene the truth and such Surueyes, would haue bene hable to haue foũd (for euer) in eche of our two Vniuersities, an excellent Mathematicall Reader: to eche, allowing (yearly) a hundred Markes of lawfull money of this realme: which, in dede, would seme requisit, here, to be had (though by other wayes prouided for) as well, as, the famous Vniuersitie of Paris, hath two Mathematicall Readers: and eche, two hundreth French Crownes yearly, of the French Kinges magnificent liberalitie onely. Now, againe, to our purpose returning: Moreouer, of the former knowledge Geometricall, are growen the Skills of Geographie, Chorographie, Hydrographie, and Stratarithmetrie.

OF these feats (further applied) has arisen the skill of Geodesy, or land measuring: a more clever way to measure and survey land, woods, and waters from afar. More clever, I say: But God knows (up until now) in these realms of England and Ireland (whether through ignorance or fraud, I can’t tell in every case) Note. how much wrong and injury has (in my time) been committed a.iij by inaccurate measuring and surveying of land or woods in any form. And, I am sure: that the value of the difference between the truth and such surveys would have been enough to fund (forever) in each of our two universities an excellent mathematics lecturer; providing each with a yearly allowance of a hundred marks in lawful money of this realm: which, indeed, would seem necessary, to be equipped for this, as well as the famous University of Paris has two mathematics lecturers, each receiving two hundred French crowns yearly, from the generous bounty of the French king alone. Now, again, returning to our topic: Moreover, from the earlier geometric knowledge have arisen the skills of Geography, Chorography, Hydrography, and Stratarithmetics.

Geographie teacheth wayes, by which, in sũdry formes, (as Sphærike, Plaine or other), the Situation of Cities, Townes, Villages, Fortes, Castells, Mountaines, Woods, Hauens, Riuers, Crekes, & such other things, vpõ the outface of the earthly Globe (either in the whole, or in some principall mẽber and portion therof cõtayned) may be described and designed, in cõmensurations Analogicall to Nature and veritie: and most aptly to our vew, may be represented. Of this Arte how great pleasure, and how manifolde commodities do come vnto vs, daily and hourely: of most men, is perceaued. While, some, to beautifie their Halls, Parlers, Chambers, Galeries, Studies, or Libraries with: other some, for thinges past, as battels fought, earthquakes, heauenly fyringes, & such occurentes, in histories mentioned: therby liuely, as it were, to vewe the place, the region adioyning, the distance from vs: and such other circumstances. Some other, presently to vewe the large dominion of the Turke: the wide Empire of the Moschouite: and the litle morsell of ground, where Christendome (by profession) is certainly knowen. Litle, I say, in respecte of the rest. &c. Some, either for their owne iorneyes directing into farre landes: or to vnderstand of other mens trauailes. To conclude, some, for one purpose: and some, for an other, liketh, loueth, getteth, and vseth, Mappes, Chartes, & Geographicall Globes. Of whose vse, to speake sufficiently, would require a booke peculier.

Geography teaches us ways to describe the location of cities, towns, villages, forts, castles, mountains, woods, harbors, rivers, creeks, and other features on the surface of the Earth (either as a whole or in specific parts of it) in a way that corresponds to nature and reality. It can be represented most effectively for our view. "” The enjoyment and countless benefits we gain from this art are apparent to most people. Some use it to decorate their halls, lounges, bedrooms, galleries, studies, or libraries, while others focus on past events, such as battles fought, earthquakes, celestial phenomena, and other occurrences mentioned in history, allowing them to vividly visualize the place, the surrounding region, the distance from us, and other related circumstances. Others wish to see the vast dominion of the Turk, the extensive Empire of the Muscovite, and the small piece of land where Christianity (by belief) is definitely known. I say it is small in comparison to the rest. Some, either for their own journeys to distant lands or to learn about the travels of others, also seek this information. In conclusion, some have one reason, and others have another; they like, appreciate, acquire, and use maps, charts, and geographical globes. To speak sufficiently about their use would require a dedicated book.

Chorographie seemeth to be an vnderling, and a twig, of Geographie: and yet neuerthelesse, is in practise manifolde, and in vse very ample. This teacheth Analogically to describe a small portion or circuite of ground, with the contentes: not regarding what commensuration it hath to the whole, or any parcell, without it, contained. But in the territory or parcell of ground which it taketh in hand to make description of, it leaueth out (or vndescribed) no notable, or odde thing, aboue the ground visible. Yea and sometimes, of thinges vnder ground, geueth some peculier marke: or warning: as of Mettall mines, Cole pittes, Stone quarries. &c. Thus, a Dukedome, a Shiere, a Lordship, or lesse, may be described distinctly. But marueilous pleasant, and profitable it is, in the exhibiting to our eye, and commensuration, the plat of a Citie, Towne, Forte, or Pallace, in true Symmetry: not approching to any of them: and out of Gunne shot. &c. Hereby, the Architect may furnishe him selfe, with store of what patterns he liketh: to his great instruction: euen in those thinges which outwardly are proportioned: either simply in them selues: or respectiuely, to Hilles, Riuers, Hauens, and Woods adioyning. Some also, terme this particular description of places, Topographie.

Geographical mapping seems to be a subordinate branch of Geography: and yet, it is quite diverse in practice and widely applicable. This method teaches us to describe a small area of land along with its contents, without considering how it relates to the whole or any surrounding parts. However, within the territory or area that it aims to describe, it leaves out no notable or unusual feature visible above ground. In fact, it sometimes even marks or alerts us to things underground, such as mineral mines, coal pits, stone quarries, etc. Thus, a dukedom, a shire, a lordship, or a smaller area can be described in detail. It is remarkably enjoyable and beneficial to present to our eyes, and measure, the layout of a city, town, fortress, or palace in true symmetry, without getting too close to any of them, and from a safe distance, such as out of gunshot range. This way, the Architect can gather plenty of patterns that he likes, for his great learning, even in those elements that are proportioned outwardly, either simply by themselves or in relation to nearby hills, rivers, harbors, and woods. Some also refer to this detailed description of places as Topography.

Hydrographie, deliuereth to our knowledge, on Globe or in Plaine, the perfect Analogicall description of the Ocean Sea coastes, through the whole world: or in the chiefe and principall partes thereof: with the Iles and chiefe || particular places of daungers, conteyned within the boundes, and Sea coastes described: as, of Quicksandes, Bankes, Pittes, Rockes, Races, Countertides, Whorlepooles. &c. This, dealeth with the Element of the water chiefly: as Geographie did principally take the Element of the Earthes description (with his appertenances) to taske. And besides thys, Hydrographie, requireth a particular Register of certaine Landmarkes (where markes may be had) from the sea, well hable to be skried, in what point of the Seacumpase they appeare, and what apparent forme, Situation, and bignes they haue, in respecte of any daungerous place in the sea, or nere vnto it, assigned: And in all Coastes, what Mone, maketh full Sea: and what way, the Tides and Ebbes, come and go, the Hydrographer ought to recorde. The Soundinges likewise: and the Chanels wayes: their number, and depthes ordinarily, at ebbe and flud, ought the Hydrographer, by obseruation and diligence of Measuring, to haue certainly knowen. And many other pointes, are belonging to perfecte Hydrographie, and for to make a Rutter, by: of which, I nede not here speake: as of the describing, in any place, vpon Globe or Plaine, the 32. pointes of the Compase, truely: (wherof, scarsly foure, in England, haue right knowledge: bycause, the lines therof, are no straight lines, nor Circles.) Of making due proiection of a Sphere in plaine. Of the Variacion of the Compas, from true Northe: And such like matters (of great importance, all) I leaue to speake of, in this place: bycause, I may seame (al ready) to haue enlarged the boundes, and duety of an Hydrographer, much more, then any man (to this day) hath noted, or prescribed. Yet am I well hable to proue, all these thinges, to appertaine, and also to be proper to the Hydrographer. The chief vse and ende of this Art, is the Art of Nauigation: but it hath other diuerse vses: euen by them to be enioyed, that neuer lacke sight of land.

Water mapping provides us with a comprehensive and detailed description of the coastal areas of the ocean around the world, including the main regions and islands: along with particular hazardous areas described within these boundaries, such as quicksands, banks, pits, rocks, currents, whirlpools, etc. This field primarily focuses on water, just as Geography primarily deals with the description of land and its features. Additionally, Hydrography requires a specific record of certain landmarks (where they are recognizable) from the water, detailing their position within the compass, their apparent shape, location, and size in relation to any dangerous spots in or near the water. It is essential for the Hydrographer to document which moon phases create high tide and the direction in which tides and ebbs flow. The soundings and channel pathways, including their quantity and depths during high and low tide, should be accurately recorded by the Hydrographer through careful observation and measurement. There are many other aspects necessary for effective Hydrography and for constructing a Rutter, which I won’t discuss here, such as accurately representing the 32 points of the compass on a globe or map (where barely four are accurately known in England, as these lines are not straight or circular). Matters such as properly projecting a sphere onto a plane, the variation of the compass from true north, and similar important topics will be left unaddressed at this point, as I may have already expanded on the duties and scope of a Hydrographer more than anyone has noted or defined to this day. Nevertheless, I can certainly prove that all these aspects relate directly to the Hydrographer. The primary use and purpose of this art is navigation, but it has several other diverse applications, even for those who are never out of sight of land.

Stratarithmetrie, is the Skill, (appertainyng to the warre,) by which a man can set in figure, analogicall to any Geometricall figure appointed, any certaine number or summe of men: of such a figure capable: (by reason of the vsuall spaces betwene Souldiers allowed: and for that, of men, can be made no Fractions. Yet, neuertheles, he can order the giuen summe of men, for the greatest such figure, that of them, cã be ordred) and certifie, of the ouerplus: (if any be) and of the next certaine summe, which, with the ouerplus, will admit a figure exactly proportionall to the figure assigned. By which Skill, also, of any army or company of men: (the figure & sides of whose orderly standing, or array, is knowen) he is able to expresse the iust number of men, within that figure conteined: or (orderly) able to be conteined. * Note. *And this figure, and sides therof, he is hable to know: either beyng by, and at hand: or a farre of. Thus farre, stretcheth the description and property of Stratarithmetrie: sufficient for this tyme and place. The difference betwene Stratarithmetrie and Tacticie. It differreth from the Feate Tacticall, De aciebus instruendis. bycause, there, is necessary the wisedome and foresight, to what purpose he so ordreth the men: and Skillfull hability, also, for any occasion, or purpose, to deuise and vse the aptest and most necessary order, array and figure of his Company and Summe of men. By figure, I meane: as, either of a Perfect Square, Triangle, Circle, Ouale, long square, (of the Grekes it is called Eteromekes) Rhombe, Rhomboïd, Lunular, Ryng, Serpentine, and such other Geometricall figures: Which, in warres, haue ben, and are to be vsed: for commodiousnes, necessity, and auauntage &c. And no small skill ought he to haue, that should make true report, or nere the truth, of the numbers and Summes, of footemen or horsemen, in the Enemyes ordring. A farre of, to make an estimate, betwene nere termes of More and Lesse, is not a thyng very rife, among those that gladly would b.j. do it. I. D.
Frende,
you will finde it hard, to performe my description of this Feate. But by Chorographie, you may helpe your selfe some what: where the Figures knowne (in Sides and Angles) are not Regular: And where, Resolution into Triangles can serue. &c. And yet you will finde it strange to deale thus generally with Arithmeticall figures: and, that for Battayle ray. Their contentes, differ so much from like Geometricall Figures.
Great pollicy may be vsed of the Capitaines, (at tymes fete, and in places conuenient) as to vse Figures, which make greatest shew, of so many as he hath: and vsing the aduauntage of the three kindes of vsuall spaces: (betwene footemen or horsemen) to take the largest: or when he would seme to haue few, (beyng many:) contrarywise, in Figure, and space. The Herald, Purseuant, Sergeant Royall, Capitaine, or who soeuer is carefull to come nere the truth herein, besides the Iudgement of his expert eye, his skill of Ordering Tacticall, the helpe of his Geometricall instrument: Ring, or Staffe Astronomicall: (commodiously framed for cariage and vse) He may wonderfully helpe him selfe, by perspectiue Glasses. In which, (I trust) our posterity will proue more skillfull and expert, and to greater purposes, then in these dayes, can (almost) be credited to be possible.

Stratarithmetics is the skill, (related to warfare) that allows a person to arrange a specific number or sum of soldiers into a geometry that corresponds to any designated geometric figure. This is because the usual spacing between soldiers has to be taken into account, and fractions of soldiers cannot exist. Nevertheless, a person can organize the given number of soldiers into the largest possible figure that can be formed, accounting for any surplus, and can also determine the next exact number that, along with the surplus, will fit neatly into the assigned figure. With this skill, they can also identify the exact number of soldiers contained within that established figure, either standing orderly or potentially capable of doing so. * Reminder. *And they can recognize this figure and its dimensions whether they are nearby or at a distance. This is the extent of the description and properties of Stratarithmetrie: enough for this time and place. The difference between Stratarithmetrie and Tacticie. It differs from the skill of Tacticall, De aciebus instruendis. because there, wisdom and foresight are necessary to determine why the soldiers are arranged in that way, and skillful ability is needed to devise and use the most suitable and necessary order, formation, and figure of their company and the number of soldiers involved. By figure, I mean any of the following: perfect square, triangle, circle, oval, long square, (which the Greeks call Eteromekes), rhombus, rhomboid, lunular, ring, serpentine, and other geometric figures. These have been and are used in warfare for convenience, necessity, and advantage, etc. One should possess considerable skill to accurately report or estimate the numbers of infantry or cavalry in the enemy’s arrangement. Making a distant estimate, between slightly more or less, is not something that is common among those who wish to do it. b.j. I. D. Friend, you might find it challenging to meet my description of this skill. However, you can help yourself by using chorography, where familiar shapes (in sides and angles) aren’t regular and breaking them down into triangles can be useful, etc. You might still find it odd to work with arithmetic figures, particularly for battle formations. Their contents are quite different from those of comparable geometric figures. Great strategies can be utilized by captains (at opportune times and in suitable places) to use figures that create the largest possible impression of the number of soldiers they have. They can take advantage of the three common types of space (between infantry or cavalry) to maximize the display, or conversely, to appear to have fewer soldiers (when they actually have many) in terms of figure and spacing. The herald, pursuivant, royal sergeant, captain, or anyone who is diligent in approaching the truth regarding this matter, besides relying on their expert judgment, their tactical organization skills, and the aid of their geometric tools: rings or astronomical staffs (conveniently designed for ease of transport and use), can greatly benefit from the use of perspective glasses. I trust that our future generations will prove to be more skilled and competent in this area and for greater purposes than can nearly be believed possible in these days.

Thus haue I lightly passed ouer the Artificiall Feates, chiefly dependyng vpon vulgar Geometrie: & commonly and generally reckened vnder the name of Geometrie. But there are other (very many) Methodicall Artes, which, declyning from the purity, simplicitie, and Immateriality, of our Principall Science of Magnitudes: do yet neuertheles vse the great ayde, direction, and Method of the sayd principall Science, and haue propre names, and distinct: both from the Science of Geometrie, (from which they are deriued) and one from the other. As Perspectiue, Astronomie, Musike, Cosmographie, Astrologie, Statike, Anthropographie, Trochilike, Helicosophie, Pneumatithmie, Menadrie, Hypogeiodie, Hydragogie, Horometrie, Zographie, Architecture, Nauigation, Thaumaturgike and Archemastrie. I thinke it necessary, orderly, of these to giue some peculier descriptions: and withall, to touch some of their commodious vses, and so to make this Preface, to be a little swete, pleasant Nosegaye for you: to comfort your Spirites, beyng almost out of courage, and in despayre, (through brutish brute) Weenyng that Geometrie, had but serued for buildyng of an house, or a curious bridge, or the roufe of Westminster hall, or some witty pretty deuise, or engyn, appropriate to a Carpenter, or a Ioyner &c. That the thing is farre otherwise, then the world, (commonly) to this day, hath demed, by worde and worke, good profe wilbe made.

I've breezed through the Artificial Feats, mainly relying on common Geometry: which is generally recognized under the name of Geometry. However, there are many other Methodical Arts, which, straying from the purity, simplicity, and immateriality of our main science of Magnitudes, still use the significant support, guidance, and methods from this main science, and have their own specific names, distinct from both the science of Geometry (from which they are derived) and from each other. These include Perspective, Astronomy, Music, Cosmography, Astrology, Statics, Anthropology, Hummingbird Studies, Spiral Studies, Pneumatics, Menadrie, Underground Geography, Hydrology, Timekeeping, Zography, Architecture, Navigation, Magic and Alchemy. I think it’s necessary to provide detailed descriptions of these in order, and also to touch on some of their useful applications, to create this Preface as a delightful little bouquet for you: to lift your spirits, which may be somewhat low and in despair (due to the brutish mentality) thinking that Geometry only serves to build a house, a fancy bridge, or the roof of Westminster Hall, or some clever device or engine related to a carpenter or a joiner, etc. The reality is far different from what the world (commonly) believes to this day, as will be clearly demonstrated.

Among these Artes, by good reason, Perspectiue ought to be had, ere of Astronomicall Apparences, perfect knowledge can be atteyned. And bycause of the prerogatiue of Light, beyng the first of Gods Creatures: and the eye, the light of our body, and his Sense most mighty, and his organ most Artificiall and Geometricall: At Perspectiue, we will begyn therfore. Perspectiue, is an Art Mathematicall, which demonstrateth the maner, and properties, of all Radiations Direct, Broken, and Reflected. This Description, or Notation, is brief: but it reacheth so farre, as the world is wyde. It concerneth all Creatures, all Actions, and passions, by Emanation of beames perfourmed. Beames, or naturall lines, (here) I meane, not of light onely, or of colour (though they, to eye, giue shew, witnes, and profe, wherby to ground the Arte vpon) but also of other Formes, both Substantiall, and Accidentall, the certaine and determined actiue Radiall emanations. By this Art (omitting to speake of the highest pointes) we may vse our eyes, and the light, with greater pleasure: and perfecter Iudgement: both of things, in light seen, & of other: which by like order of Lightes Radiations, worke and produce their effectes. We may be ashamed to be ignorant of the cause, why so sundry wayes our eye is deceiued, and abused: as, while the eye weeneth a roũd Globe or Sphere (beyng farre of) to be a flat and plaine Circle, and so likewise iudgeth || a plaine Square, to be roũd: supposeth walles parallels, to approche, a farre of: rofe and floure parallels, the one to bend downward, the other to rise vpward, at a little distance from you. Againe, of thinges being in like swiftnes of mouing, to thinke the nerer, to moue faster: and the farder, much slower. Nay, of two thinges, wherof the one (incomparably) doth moue swifter then the other, to deme the slower to moue very swift, & the other to stand: what an error is this, of our eye? Of the Raynbow, both of his Colours, of the order of the colours, of the bignes of it, the place and heith of it, (&c) to know the causes demonstratiue, is it not pleasant, is it not necessary? of two or three Sonnes appearing: of Blasing Sterres: and such like thinges: by naturall causes, brought to passe, (and yet neuertheles, of farder matter, Significatiue) is it not commodious for man to know the very true cause, & occasion Naturall? Yea, rather, is it not, greatly, against the Souerainty of Mans nature, to be so ouershot and abused, with thinges (at hand) before his eyes? as with a Pecockes tayle, and a Doues necke: or a whole ore, in water, holden, to seme broken. Thynges, farre of, to seeme nere: and nere, to seme farre of. Small thinges, to seme great: and great, to seme small. One man, to seme an Army. Or a man to be curstly affrayed of his owne shaddow. Yea, so much, to feare, that, if you, being (alone) nere a certaine glasse, and proffer, with dagger or sword, to foyne at the glasse, you shall suddenly be moued to giue backe (in maner) by reason of an A marueilous Glasse.   Image, appearing in the ayre, betwene you & the glasse, with like hand, sword or dagger, & with like quicknes, foyning at your very eye, likewise as you do at the Glasse. Straunge, this is, to heare of: but more meruailous to behold, then these my wordes can signifie. And neuerthelesse by demonstration Opticall, the order and cause therof, is certified: euen so, as the effect is consequent. Yea, thus much more, dare I take vpon me, toward the satisfying of the noble courrage, that longeth ardently for the wisedome of Causes Naturall: as to let him vnderstand, that, in London, he may with his owne eyes, haue profe of that, which I haue sayd herein. A Gentleman, (which, for his good seruice, done to his Countrey, is famous and honorable: S. W. P. and for skill in the Mathematicall Sciences, and Languages, is the Od man of this land. &c.) euen he, is hable: and (I am sure) will, very willingly, let the Glasse, and profe be sene: and so I (here) request him: for the encrease of wisedome, in the honorable: and for the stopping of the mouthes malicious: and repressing the arrogancy of the ignorant. Ye may easily gesse, what I meane. This Art of Perspectiue, is of that excellency, and may be led, to the certifying, and executing of such thinges, as no man would easily beleue: without Actuall profe perceiued. I speake nothing of Naturall Philosophie, which, without Perspectiue, can not be fully vnderstanded, nor perfectly atteined vnto. Nor, of Astronomie: which, without Perspectiue, can not well be grounded: Nor Astrologie, naturally Verified, and auouched. That part hereof, which dealeth with Glasses (which name, Glasse, is a generall name, in this Arte, for any thing, from which, a Beame reboundeth) is called Catoptrike: and hath so many vses, both merueilous, and proffitable: that, both, it would hold me to long, to note therin the principall conclusions, all ready knowne: And also (perchaunce) some thinges, might lacke due credite with you: And I, therby, to leese my labor: and you, to slip into light Iudgement*,   Before you haue learned sufficiently the powre of Nature and Arte.

Among these Arts, it's clear that Viewpoint should be prioritized before achieving a complete understanding of Astronomical Appearances. Because of the significance of Light, which is the first of God's Creations, and the eye, which is the light of our body, the strongest sense, and the most ingenious and Geometric organ, we will begin with Perspective. Perspective is a mathematical art that shows how direct, broken, and reflected rays work and their properties. This description is brief, but it extends as far as the world is wide. It concerns all Creatures, all Actions, and emotions through the emanation of performed beams. When I mention beams or natural lines here, I'm not referring solely to light or color (though they provide sight, evidence, and proof to base the Art on), but also to other Forms, both Substantial and Accidental, the certain and defined active radial emanations. Through this Art (without discussing the highest points), we can use our eyes and the light with greater pleasure and clearer judgment regarding things seen in light, and others that work and produce their effects by a similar order of Light's Radiations. We should be embarrassed to remain ignorant of why our eye is deceived and misled in so many ways: for instance, perceiving a distant round globe or sphere as a flat circle, or judging a flat square to be round; assuming parallel walls converge when seen from afar; or perceiving a roof and floor as parallels that bend downwards and upwards, respectively, at a short distance from us. Additionally, we often think that objects moving at the same speed will appear that the closer one is moving faster and the further one much slower. Incredible is the error of our eye when we see one thing, much faster than another, and mistakenly believe the slower is remarkably swift while the faster seems to stand still! Understanding the causes behind the Rainbow's colors, their order, size, position, and height—isn't it both enjoyable and necessary? To know the natural causes behind the appearance of two or three Suns, blazing stars, and similar phenomena, is it not beneficial for us to understand the true natural causes and circumstances? Yes, isn't it greatly contrary to the dignity of human nature to be so deceived and misled by things right in front of our eyes? Just like the feathers of a peacock's tail, or the neck of a dove, or an entire rod in water that appears broken. Things far away seem near, and nearby things seem far away. Small items appear large, while large ones look small. One person looks like an army, or a person might be terribly frightened of their own shadow. Indeed, to the extent that if you happen to be alone near a certain mirror and you thrust a dagger or sword at the glass, you would instinctively back away as if there were an A stunning glass. image appearing in the air between you and the mirror, mimicking your movements with the same hand, sword, or dagger, and acting with the same quickness as you do at the mirror. Strange, indeed, to hear of this; but it's even more astonishing to see than my words can convey. Still, through optical demonstration, the order and cause of it can be verified, just as the effect follows. Moreover, I dare to assure those noble souls eagerly seeking the wisdom of Natural Causes that in London, one can witness the proof of what I've stated here. A gentleman, renowned and respected for his good service to his country S.W.P. and recognized for his expertise in Mathematics and Languages, is fully capable and, I'm sure, will gladly allow the glass to be seen and the proof to be demonstrated. Thus, I request him here for the increase of wisdom among the honorable and to silence the malicious while curtailing the arrogance of the ignorant. You can easily guess what I mean. This Art of Perspective is of such excellence and can lead to the certification and realization of things that no one would easily believe without actual demonstrated proof. I speak nothing of Natural Philosophy, which cannot be fully understood or achieved without Perspective, nor of Astronomy, which cannot be well grounded without Perspective, nor Astrology, naturally verified and confirmed. That part of it which deals with Glasses (where "Glass" is a general term in this Art for anything from which a Beam is reflected) is called Catoptrics, and has so many wondrous and useful applications that it would take too long to note the principal conclusions already known. Besides, perhaps some things might not hold true credibility with you, leading me to waste my effort and you to lapsing into superficial judgment* before you've sufficiently learned the power of Nature and Art.

Now, to procede: Astronomie, is an Arte Mathematicall, which demonstrateth the distance, magnitudes, and all naturall motions, apparences, and passions propre to the Planets and fixed Sterres: for b.ij any time past, present and to come: in respect of a certaine Horizon, or without respect of any Horizon. By this Arte we are certified of the distance of the Starry Skye, and of eche Planete from the Centre of the Earth: and of the greatnes of any Fixed starre sene, or Planete, in respect of the Earthes greatnes. As, we are sure (by this Arte) that the Solidity, Massines and Body of the Sonne, conteineth the quantitie of the whole Earth and Sea, a hundred thre score and two times, lesse by ⅛ one eight parte of the earth. But the Body of the whole earthly globe and Sea, is bigger then the body of the Mone, three and forty times lesse by ⅛ of the Mone. Wherfore the Sonne is bigger then the Mone, 7000 times, lesse, by 59 39/64 that is, precisely 6940 25/64 bigger then the Mone. And yet the vnskillfull man, would iudge them a like bigge. Wherfore, of Necessity, the one is much farder from vs, then the other. The Sonne, when he is fardest from the earth (which, now, in our age, is, when he is in the 8. degree, of Cancer) is, 1179 Semidiameters of the Earth, distante. And the Mone when she is fardest from the earth, is 68 Semidiameters of the earth and ⅓ The nerest, that the Mone commeth to the earth, is Semidiameters 52¼ The distance of the Starry Skye is, frõ vs, in Semidiameters of the earth 20081½ Twenty thousand fourescore, one, and almost a halfe. Subtract from this, the Mones nerest distance, from the Earth: and therof remaineth Semidiameters of the earth 20029¼ Twenty thousand nine and twenty and a quarter. Note. So thicke is the heauenly Palace, that the Planetes haue all their exercise in, and most meruailously perfourme the Commaũdement and Charge to them giuen by the omnipotent Maiestie of the king of kings. This is that, which in Genesis is called Ha Rakia. Consider it well. The Semidiameter of the earth, cõteineth of our common miles 3436 4/11 three thousand, foure hundred thirty six and foure eleuenth partes of one myle: Such as the whole earth and Sea, round about, is 21600. One and twenty thousand six hundred of our myles. Allowyng for euery degree of the greatest circle, thre score myles. Now if you way well with your selfe but this litle parcell of frute Astronomicall, as concerning the bignesse, Distances of Sonne, Mone, Sterry Sky, and the huge massines of Ha Rakia, will you not finde your Consciences moued, with the kingly Prophet, to sing the confession of Gods Glory, and say, The Heauens declare the glory of God, and the Firmament [Ha Rakia] sheweth forth the workes of his handes. And so forth, for those fiue first staues, of that kingly Psalme. Well, well, It is time for some to lay hold on wisedome, and to Iudge truly of thinges: and notso to expound the Holy word, all by Allegories: as to Neglect the wisedome, powre and Goodnes of God, in, and by his Creatures, and Creation to be seen and learned. By parables and Analogies of whose natures and properties, the course of the Holy Scripture, also, declareth to vs very many Mysteries. The whole Frame of Gods Creatures, (which is the whole world,) is to vs, a bright glasse: from which, by reflexion, reboundeth to our knowledge and perceiuerance, Beames, and Radiations: representing the Image of his Infinite goodnes, Omnipotẽcy, and wisedome. And we therby, are taught and persuaded to Glorifie our Creator, as God: and be thankefull therfore. Could the Heathenistes finde these vses, of these most pure, beawtifull, and Mighty Corporall Creatures: and shall we, after that the true Sonne of rightwisenesse is risen aboue the Horizon, of our temporall Hemisphærie, and hath so abundantly streamed into our hartes, the direct beames of his goodnes, mercy, and grace: Whose heat All Creatures feele: Spirituall and Corporall: Visible and || Inuisible. Shall we (I say) looke vpon the Heauen, Sterres, and Planets, as an Oxe and an Asse doth: no furder carefull or inquisitiue, what they are: why were they Created, How do they execute that they were Created for? Seing, All Creatures, were for our sake created: and both we, and they, Created, chiefly to glorifie the Almighty Creator: and that, by all meanes, to vs possible. Nolite ignorare (saith Plato in Epinomis) Astronomiam, Sapientissimũ quiddam esse. Be ye not ignorant, Astronomie to be a thyng of excellent wisedome. Astronomie, was to vs, from the beginning commended, and in maner commaunded by God him selfe. In asmuch as he made the Sonne, Mone, and Sterres, to be to vs, for Signes, and knowledge of Seasons, and for Distinctions of Dayes, and yeares. Many wordes nede not. But I wish, euery man should way this word, Signes. And besides that, conferre it also with the tenth Chapter of Hieremie. And though Some thinke, that there, they haue found a rod: Yet Modest Reason, will be indifferent Iudge, who ought to be beaten therwith, in respect of our purpose. Leauing that: I pray you vnderstand this: that without great diligence of Obseruation, examination and Calculation, their periods and courses (wherby Distinction of Seasons, yeares, and New Mones might precisely be knowne) could not exactely be certified. Which thing to performe, is that Art, which we here haue Defined to be Astronomie. Wherby, we may haue the distinct Course of Times, dayes, yeares, and Ages: aswell for Consideratiõ of Sacred Prophesies, accomplished in due time, foretold: as for high Mysticall Solemnities holding: And for all other humaine affaires, Conditions, and couenantes, vpon certaine time, betwene man and man: with many other great vses: Wherin, (verely), would be great incertainty, Confusion, vntruth, and brutish Barbarousnes: without the wonderfull diligence and skill of this Arte: continually learning, and determining Times, and periodes of Time, by the Record of the heauenly booke, wherin all times are written: and to be read with an Astronomicall staffe, in stede of a festue.

Now, to proceed: Astrophysics, is a mathematical science that shows the distances, sizes, and all natural movements, appearances, and features specific to the planets and fixed stars: for b.ij Any time in the past, present, or future: in relation to a specific horizon, or without considering any horizon. Through this science, we know the distance of the starry sky and of each planet from the center of the Earth: and of the size of any fixed star or planet in relation to the size of the Earth. For instance, we know (through this science) that the mass and volume of the Sun is about one hundred sixty-two times smaller than the Earth and sea by ⅛. However, the mass of the entire Earth and sea is about forty-three times larger than that of the Moon, minus ⅛ of the Moon. Therefore, the Sun is 7,000 times larger than the Moon, minus 59 39/64, which is precisely 6,940 25/64 times larger than the Moon. Yet, an unskilled person might think they are of equal size. Hence, one is necessarily much farther from us than the other. The Sun, when it is farthest from the Earth (which, in our time, is when it is at the 8th degree of Cancer), is 1,179 semi-diameters of the Earth away. The Moon, when it is farthest from the Earth, is 68 semi-diameters of the Earth and ⅓. The closest that the Moon comes to the Earth is 52¼ semi-diameters. The distance of the starry sky from us is 20,081½ semi-diameters of the Earth, which is twenty thousand eighty-one and almost a half. Subtract from this the Moon's closest distance from the Earth: and that leaves 20,029¼ semi-diameters of the Earth, which is twenty thousand twenty-nine and a quarter. Note. So dense is the heavenly realm that the planets have all their activities within it, and most remarkably perform the commands given to them by the omnipotent majesty of the King of kings. This is what is referred to in Genesis as Ha Rakia. Think about it. The semi-diameter of the Earth contains about 3,436 4/11 of our common miles: the entire Earth and Sea, overall, measures 21,600. That is, twenty-one thousand six hundred of our miles. Allowing for each degree of the great circle, sixty miles. Now, if you just consider this little piece of astronomical knowledge regarding the size, distances of the Sun, Moon, starry sky, and the vastness of Ha Rakia, won’t you find your conscience stirred, like that of the royal prophet, to sing in praise of God’s glory and say, The sky shows off the greatness of God, and the universe [Ha Rakia] displays the works of his hands? And so on, for those first five lines of that royal Psalm. Clearly, it is time for some to embrace wisdom and to judge correctly about things: and not to interpret the Holy Word solely through allegories, neglecting to see the wisdom, power, and goodness of God in his creatures and creation. Through the parables and analogies of their natures and properties, the course of the Holy Scripture also reveals to us many mysteries. The whole framework of God’s creatures (which is the whole world) is to us a bright mirror: from which, through reflection, we receive knowledge and understanding, beams and radiations that represent the image of his infinite goodness, omnipotence, and wisdom. And we are taught and persuaded to glorify our Creator as God and be grateful for it. Could the pagans find these uses of these most pure, beautiful, and mighty corporal creatures, and shall we, after the true Sun of righteousness has risen above the horizon of our temporal hemisphere, and has abundantly filled our hearts with the direct rays of his goodness, mercy, and grace: whose warmth all creatures feel: spiritual and corporal: visible and || invisible. Shall we (I say) look upon the heavens, stars, and planets, as an ox and a donkey do: without any further care or curiosity about what they are: why they were created, and how they fulfill their purpose? Seeing that all creatures were created for our sake: and both we and they were created primarily to glorify the Almighty Creator: and that, by all means, possible to us. Nolite ignorare (says Plato in Epinomis) Astronomiam, sapientissimum quiddam esse. Don't be unaware; astronomy is a subject of great knowledge. Astronomy has been commended to us from the start and, in a way, commanded by God himself. In as much as He made the Sun, Moon, and stars to serve as signs and for knowledge of seasons, and for the distinctions of days and years. There’s no need for many words. But I wish that everyone would weigh this word, signs. And in addition, compare it with the tenth chapter of Jeremiah. And although some think they have found a stick there: yet modest reason will fairly judge who ought to be beaten with it regarding our intent. Leaving that aside: I ask you to understand this: that without great diligence in observation, examination, and calculation, their periods and courses (through which distinction of seasons, years, and new moons could be precisely known) could not be accurately determined. The accomplishment of this task is what we have defined as Astronomy. Through it, we may have a distinct understanding of times, days, years, and ages: as well for the consideration of sacred prophecies, fulfilled in due time, foretold: as for high mystical solemnities: and for all other human affairs, conditions, and agreements at certain times between man and man: with many other great uses: wherein there would undoubtedly be great uncertainty, confusion, untruth, and brutish barbarism without the wonderful diligence and skill of this science: constantly learning and determining times and periods by the record of the heavenly book, where all times are written and can be read with an astronomical staff instead of a festal celebration.

Musike, of Motion, hath his Originall cause: Therfore, after the motions most swift, and most Slow, which are in the Firmament, of Nature performed: and vnder the Astronomers Consideration: now I will Speake of an other kinde of Motion, producing sound, audible, and of Man numerable. Musike I call here that Science, which of the Grekes is called Harmonice. Not medling with the Controuersie betwene the auncient Harmonistes, and Canonistes. Musike is a Mathematicall Science, which teacheth, by sense and reason, perfectly to iudge, and order the diuersities of soundes, hye and low. Astronomie and Musike are Sisters, saith Plato. As, for Astronomie, the eyes: So, for Harmonious Motion, the eares were made. But as Astronomie hath a more diuine Contemplation, and cõmodity, then mortall eye can perceiue: So, is Musike to be considered, that the 1. *Minde may be preferred, before the eare. And from audible sound, we ought to ascende, to the examination: which numbers are Harmonious, and which not. And why, either, the one are: or the other are not. I could at large, in the heauenly 2. *motions and distances, describe a meruailous Harmonie, of Pythagoras Harpe 3. with eight stringes. Also, somwhat might be sayd of Mercurius* 4. two Harpes, eche of foure Stringes Elementall. And very straunge matter, might be alledged of the Harmonie, to our 5. *Spirituall part appropriate. As in Ptolomaus third boke, in the fourth and sixth Chapters may appeare.* 6. And what is the cause of the apt bonde, and frendly felowship, of the Intellectuall and Mentall part of vs, with our grosse & corruptible body: but a certaine Meane, and Harmonious Spiritualitie, with b.iii both participatyng, & of both (in a maner) resultynge In the 7. *Tune of Mans voyce, and also 8. * the sound of Instrument, what might be sayd, of Harmonie: No common Musicien would lightly beleue. I. D.
Read in Aristotle his 8. booke of Politikes: the 5, 6, and 7. chapters. Where you shall haue some occasion farder to thinke of Musike, than commonly is thought.
But of the sundry Mixture (as I may terme it) and concurse, diuerse collation, and Application of these Harmonies: as of thre, foure, fiue, or mo: Maruailous haue the effectes ben: and yet may be founde, and produced the like: with some proportionall consideration for our time, and being: in respect of the State, of the thinges then: in which, and by which, the wondrous effectes were wrought. Democritus and Theophrastus affirmed, that, by Musike, griefes and diseases of the Minde, and body might be cured, or inferred. And we finde in Recorde, that Terpander, Arion, Ismenias, Orpheus, Amphion, Dauid, Pythagoras, Empedocles, Asclepiades and Timotheus, by Harmonicall Consonãcy, haue done, and brought to pas, thinges, more then meruailous, to here of. Of them then, making no farder discourse, in this place: Sure I am, that Common Musike, commonly vsed, is found to the Musiciens and Hearers, to be so Commodious and pleasant, That if I would say and dispute, but thus much: That it were to be otherwise vsed, then it is, I should finde more repreeuers, then I could finde priuy, or skilfull of my meaning. In thinges therfore euident, and better knowen, then I can expresse: and so allowed and liked of, (as I would wish, some other thinges, had the like hap) I will spare to enlarge my lines any farder, but consequently follow my purpose.

Music, as a form of motion, has its original cause. Therefore, after the swiftest and slowest motions in the universe, as dictated by nature and under Astronomers' Consideration, I will now speak of another kind of motion that produces audible sound, which can be counted by humans. I refer to music here as that science known to the Greeks as Harmonice. Without engaging in the debate between the ancient Harmonists and Canonists, Music is a mathematical science that teaches, through feelings and logic, to accurately assess and organize different types of sounds, both high and low. Astronomy and music are said to be sisters by Plato. Just as Astronomy is perceived by the eyes, harmonious motion is perceived by the ears. However, just as Astronomy has a more divine contemplation and benefit than what the mortal eye can see, music should be considered so that the 1. *mind may be valued above the ear. From audible sound, we should ascend to examine which numbers are harmonious and which are not, and why one set is and the other is not. I could extensively describe a marvelous harmony in the celestial 2. *motions and distances, using Pythagoras' harp 3. with eight strings. Additionally, something could be said about Mercurius* 4. having two harps, each with four elemental strings. Very strange matters could be cited regarding the harmony appropriate to our 5. *spiritual part. As appears in the third book of Ptolemaus, in the fourth and sixth chapters.* 6. And what causes the strong bond and friendly relationship between our intellectual and mental parts and our physical, corruptible body? It is a certain means and harmonious spirituality, with both participating and, in a way, resulting in the 7. *tune of the human voice, and also 8. *the sound of instruments, which could be discussed regarding harmony: no ordinary musician would easily believe it. I. D.
Read in Aristotle's 8th book of Politikes: chapters 5, 6, and 7. Here you will find more reasons to think about music beyond the usual perspective.
But regarding the various mixtures (as I may call it), and the diverse collations and applications of these harmonies: from three, four, five, or more: they have had marvelous effects, and similar results can still be found and produced, with some proportional consideration for our time and context, based on the state of affairs then, in which and by which astonishing effects were achieved. Democritus and Theophrastus asserted that music could cure the griefs and ailments of the mind and body. We find recorded that Terpander, Arion, Ismenias, Orpheus, Amphion, David, Pythagoras, Empedocles, Asclepiades, and Timotheus, through harmonic consonance, accomplished and achieved things that are more than marvelous to hear about. As for them, I won't elaborate further here. I am sure that common music, widely used, is recognized by musicians and listeners as so convenient and enjoyable, that if I were to argue just this: that it ought to be used differently than it is, I would find more critics than those who understand or agree with my intent. In matters therefore evident and better known than I can express, and so accepted and appreciated (as I wish some other subjects had similar fortune), I will refrain from extending my commentary further and will instead follow my purpose accordingly.

Of Cosmographie, I appointed briefly in this place, to geue you some intelligence. Cosmographie, is the whole and perfect description of the heauenly, and also elementall parte of the world, and their homologall application, and mutuall collation necessarie. This Art, requireth Astronomie, Geographie, Hydrographie and Musike. Therfore, it is no small Arte, nor so simple, as in common practise, it is (slightly) considered. This matcheth Heauen, and the Earth, in one frame, and aptly applieth parts Correspõdent: So, as, the Heauenly Globe, may (in practise) be duely described vpon the Geographicall, and Hydrographicall Globe. And there, for vs to consider an Æquonoctiall Circle, an Ecliptike line, Colures, Poles, Sterres in their true Longitudes, Latitudes, Declinations, and Verticalitie: also Climes, and Parallels: and by an Horizon annexed, and reuolution of the earthly Globe (as the Heauen, is, by the Primouant, caried about in 24. æquall Houres) to learne the Risinges and Settinges of Sterres (of Virgill in his Georgikes: of Hesiod: of Hippocrates in his Medicinall Sphære, to Perdicca King of the Macedonians: of Diocles, to King Antigonus, and of other famous Philosophers prescribed) a thing necessary, for due manuring of the earth, for Nauigation, for the Alteration of mans body: being, whole, Sicke, wounded, or brused. By the Reuolution, also, or mouing of the Globe Cosmographicall, the Rising and Setting of the Sonne: the Lengthes, of dayes and nightes: the Houres and times (both night and day) are knowne: with very many other pleasant and necessary vses: Wherof, some are knowne: but better remaine, for such to know and vse:   who of a sparke of true fire, can make a wonderfull bonfire, by applying of due matter, duely.

Of Cosmography, I want to briefly share some insight with you. Cosmography is the thorough and precise description of both the celestial and terrestrial aspects of the world, along with their relevant uses and necessary comparisons. This art requires Astronomy, Geography, Hydrography, and Music. Therefore, it's not a small or simple art, as it's often considered in everyday practice. It connects Heaven and Earth in one framework and appropriately relates corresponding parts: so that the Heavenly Sphere can be accurately represented on the Geographical and Hydrographical Globe. There, we can examine an Equinoctial Circle, an Ecliptic line, Colures, Poles, and Stars in their true Longitudes, Latitudes, Declinations, and Verticality: also Climates and Parallels: and through an Horizon attached, and the rotation of the earthly Globe (as Heaven is circled by the Prime Meridian in 24 equal hours) to learn the Rising and Setting of Stars (from Virgil in his Georgics: Hesiod: Hippocrates in his Medical Sphere to King Perdiccas of the Macedonians: Diocles to King Antigonus, and other famous Philosophers mentioned) is essential for proper cultivation of the earth, for Navigation, and for the alteration of the human body: whether whole, sick, injured, or bruised. Through the revolution or movement of the Cosmographical Globe, the Rising and Setting of the Sun, the lengths of days and nights, and the hours and times (both night and day) are known: along with many other useful and delightful applications, some of which are known but many are better understood and applied by those who can turn a spark of true fire into a wonderful bonfire through the right materials, used properly.

Of Astrologie, here I make an Arte, seuerall from Astronomie: not by new deuise, but by good reason and authoritie: for, Astrologie, is an Arte Mathematicall, which reasonably demonstrateth the operations and effectes, of the naturall beames, of light, and secrete influence: of the Sterres and Planets: in euery element and elementall body: || at all times, in any Horizon assigned. This Arte is furnished with many other great Artes and experiences: As with perfecte Perspectiue, Astronomie, Cosmographie, Naturall Philosophie of the 4. Elementes, the Arte of Graduation, and some good vnderstãding in Musike: and yet moreouer, with an other great Arte, hereafter following, though I, here, set this before, for some considerations me mouing. Sufficient (you see) is the stuffe, to make this rare and secrete Arte, of: and hard enough to frame to the Conclusion Syllogisticall. Yet both the manifolde and continuall trauailes of the most auncient and wise Philosophers, for the atteyning of this Arte: and by examples of effectes, to confirme the same: hath left vnto vs sufficient proufe and witnesse: and we, also, daily may perceaue, That mans body, and all other Elementall bodies, are altered, disposed, ordred, pleasured, and displeasured, by the Influentiall working of the Sunne, Mone, and the other Starres and Planets. And therfore, sayth Aristotle, in the first of his Meteorologicall bookes, in the second Chapter: Est autem necessariò Mundus iste, supernis lationibus ferè continuus. Vt, inde, vis eius vniuersa regatur. Ea siquidem Causà prima putanda omnibus est, vnde motus principium existit. That is: This [Elementall] World is of necessitie, almost, next adioyning, to the heauenly motions: That, from thence, all his vertue or force may be gouerned. For, that is to be thought the first Cause vnto all: from which, the beginning of motion, is. And againe, in the tenth Chapter. Oportet igitur & horum principia sumamus, & causas omnium similiter. Principium igitur vt mouens, præcipuumque & omnium primum, Circulus ille est, in quo manifeste Solis latio, &c. And so forth. His Meteorologicall bookes, are full of argumentes, and effectuall demonstrations, of the vertue, operation, and power of the heauenly bodies, in and vpon the fower Elementes, and other bodies, of them (either perfectly, or vnperfectly) composed. And in his second booke, De Generatione & Corruptione, in the tenth Chapter. Quocirca & prima latio, Ortus & Interitus causa non est: Sed obliqui Circuli latio: ea namque & continua est, & duobus motibus fit: In Englishe, thus. Wherefore the vppermost motion, is not the cause of Generation and Corruption, but the motion of the Zodiake: for, that, both, is continuall, and is caused of two mouinges. And in his second booke, and second Chapter of hys Physikes. Homo namque generat hominem, atque Sol. For Man (sayth he) and the Sonne, are cause of mans generation. Authorities may be brought, very many: both of 1000. 2000. yea and 3000. yeares Antiquitie: of great Philosophers, Expert, Wise, and godly men, for that Conclusion: which, daily and hourely, we men, may discerne and perceaue by sense and reason: All beastes do feele, and simply shew, by their actions and passions, outward and inward: All Plants, Herbes, Trees, Flowers, and Fruites. And finally, the Elementes, and all thinges of the Elementes composed, do geue Testimonie (as Aristotle sayd) that theyr Whole Dispositions, vertues, and naturall motions, depend of the Actiuitie of the heauenly motions and Influences. Whereby, beside the specificall order and forme, due to euery seede: and beside the Nature, propre to the Indiuiduall Matrix, of the thing produced: What shall be the heauenly Impression, the perfect and circumspecte Astrologien hath to Conclude. Not onely (by Apotelesmes) τὸ ὁτὶ. but by Naturall and Mathematicall demonstration τὸ διότι. Whereunto, what Sciences are requisite (without exception) I partly haue here warned: And in my Propædeumes (besides other matter there disclosed) I haue Mathematically furnished vp the whole Method: To this our age, not so carefully handled by any, that b.iiij euer I saw, or heard of. I was, * Anno. 1548 and 1549. in Louayn. (for *21. yeares ago) by certaine earnest disputations, of the Learned Gerardus Mercator, and Antonius Gogaua, (and other,) therto so prouoked: and (by my constant and inuincible zeale to the veritie) in obseruations of Heauenly Influencies (to the Minute of time,) than, so diligent: And chiefly by the Supernaturall influence, from the Starre of Iacob, so directed: That any Modest and Sober Student, carefully and diligently seking for the Truth, will both finde & cõfesse, therin, to be the Veritie, of these my wordes: And also become a Reasonable Reformer, of three Sortes of people: about these Influentiall Operations, greatly erring from the truth. Note. Wherof, the one, is Light Beleuers, the other, Light Despisers, and the third Light Practisers. The first, & most cõmon Sort, thinke the Heauen and Sterres, to be answerable to any their doutes or desires: 1. which is not so: and, in dede, they, to much, ouer reache. The Second sorte thinke no Influentiall vertue (frõ the heauenly bodies) to beare any Sway in Generation 2. and Corruption, in this Elementall world. And to the Sunne, Mone and Sterres (being so many, so pure, so bright, so wonderfull bigge, so farre in distance, so manifold in their motions, so constant in their periodes. &c.) they assigne a sleight, simple office or two, and so allow vnto thẽ (according to their capacities) as much vertue, and power Influentiall, as to the Signe of the Sunne, Mone, and seuen Sterres, hanged vp (for Signes) in London, for distinction of houses, & such grosse helpes, in our worldly affaires: And they vnderstand not (or will not vnderstand) of the other workinges, and vertues of the Heauenly Sunne, Mone, and Sterres: not so much, as the Mariner, or Husband man: no, not so much, as the Elephant doth, as the Cynocephalus, as the Porpentine doth: nor will allow these perfect, and incorruptible mighty bodies, so much vertuall Radiation, & Force, as they see in a litle peece of a Magnes stone: which, at great distance, sheweth his operation. And perchaunce they thinke, the Sea & Riuers (as the Thames) to be some quicke thing, and so to ebbe, and flow, run in and out, of them selues, at their owne fantasies. God helpe, God helpe. Surely, these men, come to short: and either are to dull: or willfully blind: or, perhaps, to malicious. The third man, is the common and vulgare Astrologien, or Practiser: who, being not duely, artificially, and perfectly 3. furnished: yet, either for vaine glory, or gayne: or like a simple dolt, & blinde Bayard, both in matter and maner, erreth: to the discredit of the Wary, and modest Astrologien: and to the robbing of those most noble corporall Creatures, of their Naturall Vertue: being most mighty: most beneficiall to all elementall Generation, Corruption and the appartenances: and most Harmonious in their Monarchie: For which thinges, being knowen, and modestly vsed: we might highly, and continually glorifie God, with the princely Prophet, saying. The Heauens declare the Glorie of God: who made the Heauẽs in his wisedome: who made the Sonne, for to haue dominion of the day: the Mone and Sterres to haue dominion of the nyght: whereby, Day to day vttereth talke: and night, to night declareth knowledge. Prayse him, all ye Sterres, and Light. Amen.

About Astrology, I am creating an art form that is distinct from Astronomy: not through new inventions, but through solid reasoning and established authority. Astrology is a mathematical art that effectively shows how the natural light rays and hidden influences of the stars and planets impact every element and elemental body: || at all times, in any given timeframe. This art is supported by many other significant arts and experiences, including perfect Perspective, Astronomy, Cosmography, Natural Philosophy of the four elements, the art of graduation, and a solid understanding of Music: and also, with another significant art that follows, though I present this first due to various considerations. Clearly, the material provided is sufficient to create this rare and secret art, and complex enough to lead to conclusive syllogism. Yet, the manifold and continuous efforts of the most ancient and wise philosophers to attain this art, as well as examples of its effects to confirm it, have left us with enough proof and testimony. We can also see daily that the human body, along with all other elemental bodies, is altered, arranged, influenced, pleased, and displeased by the impactful workings of the Sun, Moon, and the other stars and planets. Therefore, Aristotle states in the first of his Meteorological books, in the second chapter: It is necessary that this world is almost continuously connected to heavenly movements so that all its power can be governed from there. This is to be considered the primary cause of all things, from which the motion begins. That is: This [Elemental] The world is closely connected to the movements of the heavens: From this, all its power and influence can be directed. This is regarded as the primary Cause of everything: from which all motion begins. And again, in the tenth chapter. Therefore, we must take the principles of these and the causes of all alike. Thus, the primary moving principle, and the most essential of all, is that circle in which the motion of the Sun is clearly seen, etc. And so on. His Meteorological books are filled with arguments and effective demonstrations of the virtue, operation, and power of heavenly bodies on and within the four elements and other bodies, whether perfectly or imperfectly composed of them. In his second book, On Generation and Corruption, in the tenth chapter. Therefore, the uppermost motion is not the cause of Generation and Corruption, but the motion of the Zodiac: for that is both continuous and arises from two movements. In English, thus: Therefore, the highest movement is not the cause of Generation and Corruption, but the movement of the Zodiac: because it is both continuous and comes from two movements. And in his second book, and second chapter of his Physics. For Man (he says) and the Sun, are the cause of man's generation. For Man (he says) and the Sun are the reasons for man's creation. Numerous authorities can be referenced, extending back 1000, 2000, even 3000 years: from great Philosophers, Experts, Wise, and godly men, regarding this conclusion: which we can discern and perceive daily through our senses and reasoning. All animals feel and clearly manifest, through their actions and feelings, both outwardly and inwardly: All Plants, Herbs, Trees, Flowers, and Fruits. Finally, the Elements, and all things composed from them, testify (as Aristotle said) that their Entire dispositions, virtues, and natural movements are influenced by the activity of celestial motions and forces. Therefore, apart from the specific order and form associated with each seed and the unique nature of the individual matrix of what is created, the careful and insightful astrologer must determine what the celestial influence will be. Not only (by Apotelesmes) the fact that, but also by natural and mathematical demonstration the reason. Regarding which sciences are necessary (without exception) I have partly warned here: And in my Propædeumes (besides other matters disclosed there) I have mathematically outlined the whole method: To our age, not so carefully handled by anyone that b.iiij I have ever seen or heard of. I was, In 1548 and 1549, in Louvain. (for *21 years ago) provoked by certain earnest disputes of the learned Gerardus Mercator and Antonius Gogaua, (and others), and (by my consistent and unwavering zeal for the truth) through observations of heavenly influences (to the minute) at that time, so diligently: And primarily by the supernatural influence from the Star of Jacob, so directed: That any modest and sober student earnestly seeking the truth will both find and confess the truth of my words: And also become a reasonable reformer of three types of people regarding these influential operations, who greatly err from the truth. Note. Of these, the first is Light Believers, the second, Light Haters, and the third Light Practitioners. The first, and most common group, thinks that the heavens and stars are responsive to all their doubts or desires: There is no text provided to modernize. Please provide a short piece of text (5 words or fewer) for me to work on. which is not true: and, in fact, they often overreach. The second group believes there is no influential virtue (from the heavenly bodies) that has any sway in Generation and Corruption in this elemental world. They assign a minimal, simple role or two to the Sun, Moon, and Stars (which are so many, so pure, so bright, so wonderfully large, so distant, so multifaceted in their motions, so constant in their cycles, etc.), allowing them (according to their capacities) as much influence and power as a symbol of the Sun, Moon, and seven stars hung up (as signs) in London, for distinguishing houses, and providing such gross aids in our worldly affairs. They do not understand (or refuse to understand) the other workings and virtues of the Heavenly Sun, Moon, and Stars: not even as much as sailors or farmers do; in fact, not as much as an Elephant, or Cynocephalus, or Porcupine do. They won’t grant these perfect, incorruptible mighty bodies as much radiant virtue and force as they see in a small piece of Magnes stone: which, at great distances, shows its operation. And perhaps they think the seas and rivers (like the Thames) are lively things, flowing in and out on their own whims. God help us, God help us! Surely, these people come up short: they are either too dull, willfully blind, or perhaps too malicious. The third man is the common and ordinary Astrologer or practitioner, who, not being adequately, artificially, and perfectly prepared, either for vain glory, gain, or as a simple fool, both in knowledge and manner, errs: discrediting the cautious and modest Astrologer and robbing those most noble corporeal creatures of their natural virtue: which is most powerful and beneficial to all elemental Generation, Corruption, and their belongings: and most harmonious in their monarchy. For if we were to know these things, and use them modestly, we could greatly and continually glorify God, with the princely prophet saying: The heavens proclaim the glory of God, who created them with wisdom; He made the Sun to rule over the day and the Moon and Stars to rule over the night. Day after day, they speak, and night after night, they share knowledge. Praise Him, all you Stars and Light. Amen.

In order, now foloweth, of Statike, somewhat to say, what we meane by that name: and what commodity, doth, on such Art, depend. Statike, is an Arte Mathematicall, which demonstrateth the causes of heauynes, and lightnes of all thynges: and of motions and properties, to heauynes and lightnes, belonging. And for asmuch as, by the Bilanx, or Balance (as the chief sensible Instrument,) Experience of these demonstrations may || be had: we call this Art, Statike: that is, the Experimentes of the Balance. Oh, that men wist, what proffit, (all maner of wayes) by this Arte might grow, to the hable examiner, and diligent practiser. Thou onely, knowest all thinges precisely (O God) who hast made weight and Balance, thy Iudgement: who hast created all thinges in Number, Waight, and Measure: and hast wayed the mountaines and hils in a Balance: who hast peysed in thy hand, both Heauen and earth. We therfore warned by the Sacred word, to Consider thy Creatures: and by that consideration, to wynne a glyms (as it were,) or shaddow of perceiuerance, that thy wisedome, might, and goodnes is infinite, and vnspeakable, in thy Creatures declared: And being farder aduertised, by thy mercifull goodnes, that, three principall wayes, were, of the, vsed in Creation of all thy Creatures, namely, Number, Waight and Measure, And for as much as, of Number and Measure, the two Artes (auncient, famous, and to humaine vses most necessary,) are, all ready, sufficiently knowen and extant: This third key, we beseche thee (through thy accustomed goodnes,) that it may come to the nedefull and sufficient knowledge, of such thy Seruauntes, as in thy workemanship, would gladly finde, thy true occasions (purposely of the vsed) whereby we should glorifie thy name, and shew forth (to the weaklinges in faith) thy wondrous wisedome and Goodnes. Amen.

In order, here follows a discussion of Static, explaining what we mean by that name and what benefits it brings. Statike is a mathematical art that shows the reasons for heaviness and lightness in everything, along with the movements and characteristics associated with heaviness and lightness. Because we can gain experience of these demonstrations through the Bilanx or Balance (which serves as the main tangible instrument), we call this art Statike: meaning the Experiments of the Balance. Oh, if only people knew the benefits that could arise in various ways from this art for those who are capable of examining and diligently practicing it. Only you know all things exactly (O God), who have made weight and balance your judgment; who have created everything in Number, Weight, and Measure; and have weighed the mountains and hills in a balance; who have held both heaven and earth in your hand. Therefore, we are warned by the Sacred word to consider your creatures, and through that consideration, to gain a glimpse (as it were) or a hint of understanding, that your wisdom, power, and goodness are infinite and indescribable, as declared in your creatures. And as we are further informed by your merciful goodness, that three principal aspects were used in the creation of all your creatures, namely, Number, Weight, and Measure. Since the two arts of Number and Measure (ancient, renowned, and most necessary for human use) are already well known and available, we beseech you (through your customary goodness) that this third key may come to the necessary and sufficient knowledge of your servants who, in your craftsmanship, would gladly seek out your true purposes (especially for use) so we might glorify your name and demonstrate (to the weak in faith) your wondrous wisdom and goodness. Amen.

Meruaile nothing at this pang (godly frend, you Gentle and zelous Student.) An other day, perchaunce, you will perceiue, what occasion moued me. Here, as now, I will giue you some ground, and withall some shew, of certaine commodities, by this Arte arising. And bycause this Arte is rare, my wordes and practises might be to darke: vnleast you had some light, holden before the matter: and that, best will be, in giuing you, out of Archimedes demonstrations, a few principal Conclusions, as foloweth.

Meruaile nothing at this point (godly friend, you Gentle and zealous Student.) Another day, perhaps, you will understand what prompted me. Here, as now, I will give you some background, along with some insight, into certain benefits that come from this Art. And because this Art is rare, my words and practices might be a bit obscure, unless you have some guidance to shed light on the subject: and that will be best achieved by presenting you with a few key Conclusions from Archimedes’ demonstrations, as follows.

1.

The Superficies of euery Liquor, by it selfe consistyng, and in quyet, is Sphæricall: the centre whereof, is the same, which is the centre of the Earth.

The surface of every liquid, when it stands alone and is still, is spherical: the center of this sphere is the same as the center of the Earth.

2.

If Solide Magnitudes, being of the same bignes, or quãtitie, that any Liquor is, and hauyng also the same Waight: be let downe into the same Liquor, they will settle downeward, so, that no parte of them, shall be aboue the Superficies of the Liquor: and yet neuertheles, they will not sinke vtterly downe, or drowne.

If solid objects, having the same size or quantity as any liquid and also weighing the same, are placed in that liquid, they will settle down so that no part of them is above the surface of the liquid. However, they will not sink completely or drown.

3.

If any Solide Magnitude beyng Lighter then a Liquor, be let downe into the same Liquor, it will settle downe, so farre into the same Liquor, that so great a quantitie of that Liquor, as is the parte of the Solid Magnitude, settled downe into the same Liquor: is in Waight, æquall, to the waight of the whole Solid Magnitude.

If any solid object is lighter than a liquid and is placed in that liquid, it will sink down into the liquid until the weight of the liquid displaced by the solid object is equal to the weight of the entire solid object.

4.
c.j.

Any Solide Magnitude, Lighter then a Liquor, forced downe into the same Liquor, will moue vpward, with so great a power, by how much, the Liquor hauyng æquall quantitie to the whole Magnitude, is heauyer then the same Magnitude.

Any solid object that is lighter than a liquid, when pushed down into the same liquid, will move upward with a force proportional to how much heavier the liquid is than the entire object.

5.

Any Solid Magnitude, heauyer then a Liquor, beyng let downe into the same Liquor, will sinke downe vtterly: And wilbe in that Liquor, Lighter by so much, as is the waight or heauynes of the Liquor, hauing bygnes or quantitie, æquall to the Solid Magnitude.

Any solid object that is heavier than a liquid, when placed into that liquid, will sink completely. And in that liquid, it will feel lighter by an amount equal to the weight of the liquid that has the same volume as the solid object.

6.
I. D.
The cutting of a sphere in any specified proportion can be done mechanically by adjusting the liquid to a specific weight in relation to the weight of the sphere floating in it.

If any Solide Magnitude, Lighter then a Liquor, be let downe into the same Liquor, the waight of the same Magnitude, will be, to the Waight of the Liquor. (Which is æquall in quantitie to the whole Magnitude,) in that proportion, that the parte, of the Magnitude settled downe, is to the whole Magnitude.

If any solid object, lighter than a liquid, is placed in that same liquid, the weight of the object will relate to the weight of the liquid (which is equal in quantity to the entire object) in the same proportion as the part of the object that is submerged is to the whole object.

BY these verities, great Errors may be reformed, in Opinion of the Naturall Motion of thinges, Light and Heauy. Which errors, are in Naturall Philosophie (almost) of all mẽ allowed: to much trusting to Authority: and false Suppositions. As, Of any two bodyes, the heauyer, to moue downward faster then the lighter. A common error, noted. This error, is not first by me, Noted: but by one Iohn Baptist de Benedictis. The chief of his propositions, is this: which seemeth a Paradox.

BY these truths, major misconceptions can be corrected regarding the natural motion of things, light and heavy. These misconceptions are widely accepted in natural philosophy due to excessive reliance on authority and false assumptions. For example, Of any two objects, the heavier one falls faster than the lighter one. A noted common mistake. This error was not first pointed out by me, but by one John Baptist de Benedictis. The main point of his argument is this, which seems like a paradox.

A contradiction.

If there be two bodyes of one forme, and of one kynde, æquall in quantitie or vnæquall, they will moue by æquall space, in æquall tyme: So that both theyr mouynges be in ayre, or both in water: or in any one Middle.

If there are two objects that are the same shape and type, whether they are the same size or not, they will travel the same distance in the same amount of time, whether they are both moving through air, both in water, or in any other medium.

Hereupon, in the feate of N. T. Gunnyng, certaine good discourses (otherwise) may receiue great amendement, and furderance. The wonderfull vse of these Propositions. In the entended purpose, also, allowing somwhat to the imperfection of Nature: not aunswerable to the precisenes of demonstration. Moreouer, by the foresaid propositions (wisely vsed.) The Ayre, the water, the Earth, the Fire, may be nerely, knowen, how light or heauy they are (Naturally) in their assigned partes: or in the whole. And then, to thinges Elementall, turning your practise: you may deale for the proportion of the Elementes, in the thinges Compounded. Then, to the proportions of the Humours in Man: their waightes: and the waight of his bones, and flesh. &c. Than, by waight, to haue consideration of the Force of man, any maner of way: in whole or in part. Then, may you, of Ships water drawing, diuersly, in the Sea and in fresh water, haue pleasant consideration: and of waying vp of any thing, sonken in Sea or in fresh water &c. And (to lift vp your head a loft:) by waight, you may, as precisely, as by any instrument els, measure the Diameters of Sonne and Mone. &c. Frende, I pray you, way these thinges, with the iust Balance of Reason. And you will finde Meruailes vpon Meruailes: And esteme one Drop of Truth (yea in Naturall Philosophie) more worth, then whole Libraries of Opinions, vndemonstrated: or not aunswering to Natures Law, and your experience. Leauing these || thinges, thus: I will giue you two or three, light practises, to great purpose: and so finish my Annotation Staticall. In Mathematicall matters, by the Mechaniciens ayde, we will behold, here, the Commodity of waight. The practise Staticall, to know the proportion, betwene the Cube, and the Sphære. Make a Cube, of any one Vniforme: and through like heauy stuffe: of the same Stuffe, make a Sphære or Globe, precisely, of a Diameter æquall to the Radicall side of the Cube. Your stuffe, may be wood, Copper, Tinne, Lead, Siluer. &c. (being, as I sayd, of like nature, condition, and like waight throughout.) And you may, by Say Balance, haue prepared a great number of the smallest waightes: which, by those Balance can be discerned or tryed: and so, haue proceded to make you a perfect Pyle, company & Number of waightes: to the waight of six, eight, or twelue pound waight: most diligently tryed, all. And of euery one, the Content knowen, in your least waight, that is wayable. [They that can not haue these waightes of precisenes: may, by Sand, Vniforme, and well dusted, make them a number of waightes, somewhat nere precisenes: by halfing euer the Sand: they shall, at length, come to a least common waight. Therein, I leaue the farder matter, to their discretion, whom nede shall pinche.] The Venetians consideration of waight, may seme precise enough: by eight descentes progressionall,* * I. D.
For, so, haue you .256. partes of a Graine.
halfing, from a grayne. Your Cube, Sphære, apt Balance, and conuenient waightes, being ready: fall to worke.❉. First, way your Cube. Note the Number of the waight. Way, after that, your Sphære. Note likewise, the Nũber of the waight. If you now find the waight of your Cube, to be to the waight of the Sphære, as 21. is to 11: Then you see, how the Mechanicien and Experimenter, without Geometrie and Demonstration, are (as nerely in effect) tought the proportion of the Cube to the Sphere: as I haue demonstrated it, in the end of the twelfth boke of Euclide. Often, try with the same Cube and Sphære. Then, chaunge, your Sphære and Cube, to an other matter: or to an other bignes: till you haue made a perfect vniuersall Experience of it. Possible it is, that you shall wynne to nerer termes, in the proportion.

Here, in the art of N. T. Shooting, some insightful discussions can receive significant improvement and advancement. The amazing application of these Propositions. In the intended goal, while acknowledging the imperfections of Nature which aren't always in line with precise demonstration. Furthermore, with the aforementioned propositions (when used wisely), the Air, Water, Earth, and Fire can be understood in terms of how light or heavy they are (naturally) in their respective parts or as a whole. Then, regarding elemental substances, you can work out the proportions of the elements in compound materials. Next, you can look at the proportions of the Humors in humans: their weights, along with the weight of bones and flesh, etc. Then, based on weight, you can consider a person's strength in any manner: as a whole or in parts. After that, for ships, you can contemplate their water displacement differently in saltwater and freshwater, and also consider the weights of any objects submerged in seawater or freshwater, etc. And (to lift your eyes upward): you can measure the Diameters of the Sun and Moon just as accurately as with any other instrument, based on weight. Friend, I urge you to weigh these things using the precise Balance of Reason. You will find wonders upon wonders and value one Drop of Truth (even in Natural Philosophy) more than entire Libraries of Opinions, which lack demonstration or do not align with Nature's Law and your own experience. Leaving these things thus: I will give you two or three simple practices with great purpose and finish my Static Analysis. In mathematical matters, with the help of mechanics, we will examine, here, the benefits of weight. The fixed exercise is to understand the ratio between the Cube and the Sphere. Create a Cube of any uniform material: and from the same heavy material, make a Sphere or Globe, precisely with a diameter equal to the side length of the Cube. Your material can be wood, copper, tin, lead, silver, etc. (provided it’s of the same nature, condition, and consistent weight throughout). You may have prepared a significant quantity of small weights by using a scale, which can be determined or tested; thus, you can create a perfect pile, collection, and number of weights, ideally weighing six, eight, or twelve pounds, all rigorously tested. For each, the content known in your smallest weight that can be measured. [Those who cannot have weights of precise measure can create a number of weights, somewhat close to precision, using uniform and well-dusted sand; by continually halving the sand, they will eventually arrive at a least common weight. In this, I leave the further matters to the discretion of those in need.] The Venetians' approach to weight may seem precise enough: by halving through eight progressive steps,* * I. D.
Because, you have .256 parts of a grain.
halfway down from a grain. With your Cube, Sphere, accurate scale, and suitable weights ready, proceed. ❉. First, weigh your Cube. Note the weight. Then weigh your Sphere. Note that weight as well. If you now find the weight of your Cube to be to the weight of the Sphere as 21 is to 11, then you see how the Mechanic and Experimenter, without geometry and demonstration, learn the proportion of the Cube to the Sphere, as I have demonstrated in the end of the twelfth book of Euclid. Test with the same Cube and Sphere repeatedly. Then, change your Sphere and Cube to different materials or sizes until you have created a perfect universal experience of this. It is possible you will arrive at closer terms in the proportion.

When you haue found this one certaine Drop of Naturall veritie, procede on, to Inferre, and duely to make assay, of matter depending. As, bycause it is well demonstrated, that a Cylinder, whose heith, and Diameter of his base, is æquall to the Diameter of the Sphære, is Sesquialter to the same Sphære (that is, as 3. to 2:) To the number of the waight of the Sphære, adde halfe so much, as it is: and so haue you the number of the waight of that Cylinder. Which is also Comprehended of our former Cube: So, that the base of that Cylinder, is a Circle described in the Square, which is the base of our Cube. But the Cube and the Cylinder, being both of one heith, haue their Bases in the same proportion, in the which, they are, one to an other, in their Massines or Soliditie. But, before, we haue two numbers, expressing their Massines, Solidities, and Quantities, by waight: wherfore, we haue * The proportion of the Square to the Circle inscribed. *the proportion of the Square, to the Circle, inscribed in the same Square. And so are we fallen into the knowledge sensible, and Experimentall of Archimedes great Secret: of him, by great trauaile of minde, sought and found. Wherfore, to any Circle giuen, you can giue a Square æquall: * The Squaring of the Circle, Mechanically. *as I haue taught, in my Annotation, vpon the first proposition of the twelfth boke, And likewise, to any Square giuen, you may giue a Circle æquall: * To any Square geuen, to geue a Circle, equall. *If you describe a Circle, which shall be in that proportion, to your Circle inscribed, as the Square is to the same Circle: This, you may do, by my Annotations, vpon the second proposition of the twelfth boke of Euclide, in my third Probleme there. Your diligence may come to a proportion, of the Square to the Circle inscribed, nerer the truth, then is the proportion of 14. to 11. And consider, that you may begyn at the Circle and Square, and so come to conclude of the Sphære, & the Cube, what c.ij their proportion is: as now, you came from the Sphære to the Circle. For, of Siluer, or Gold, or Latton Lamyns or plates (thorough one hole drawẽ, as the maner is) if you make a Square figure & way it: and then, describing theron, the Circle inscribed: & cut of, & file away, precisely (to the Circle) the ouerplus of the Square: you shall then, waying your Circle, see, whether the waight of the Square, be to your Circle, as 14. to 11. As I haue Noted, in the beginning of Euclides twelfth boke. &c. after this resort to my last proposition, vpon the last of the twelfth. And there, helpe your selfe, to the end. And, here, Note this, by the way. Note Squaring of the Circle without knowledge of the proportion betwene Circumference and Diameter. That we may Square the Circle, without hauing knowledge of the proportion, of the Circumference to the Diameter: as you haue here perceiued. And otherwayes also, I can demonstrate it. So that, many haue cumberd them selues superfluously, by trauailing in that point first, which was not of necessitie, first: and also very intricate. And easily, you may, (and that diuersly) come to the knowledge of the Circumference: the Circles Quantitie, being first knowen. Which thing, I leaue to your consideration: making hast to despatch an other Magistrall Probleme: and to bring it, nerer to your knowledge, and readier dealing with, then the world (before this day,) had it for you, that I can tell of. And that is, A Mechanicall Dubblyng of the Cube: &c. Which may, thus, be done: To Dubble the Cube redily: by Art Mechanicall: depending vppon Demonstration Mathematicall. Make of Copper plates, or Tyn plates, a foursquare vpright Pyramis, or a Cone: perfectly fashioned in the holow, within. Wherin, let great diligence be vsed, to approche (as nere as may be) to the Mathematicall perfection of those figures. At their bases, let them be all open: euery where, els, most close, and iust to. From the vertex, to the Circumference of the base of the Cone: & to the sides of the base of the Pyramis: I. D.
The 4. sides of this Pyramis must be 4. Isosceles Triangles alike and æquall.
Let 4. straight lines be drawen, in the inside of the Cone and Pyramis: makyng at their fall, on the perimeters of the bases, equall angles on both sides them selues, with the sayd perimeters. These 4. lines (in the Pyramis: and as many, in the Cone) diuide: one, in 12. æquall partes: and an other, in 24. an other, in 60, and an other, in 100. (reckenyng vp from the vertex.) Or vse other numbers of diuision, as experience shall teach you. Then,* I. D.
* In all workinges with this Pyramis or Cone, Let their Situations be in all Pointes and Conditions, alike, or all one: while you are about one Worke. Els you will erre.
set your Cone or Pyramis, with the vertex downward, perpendicularly, in respect of the Base. (Though it be otherwayes, it hindreth nothyng.) So let thẽ most stedily be stayed. Now, if there be a Cube, which you wold haue Dubbled. Make you a prety Cube of Copper, Siluer, Lead, Tynne, Wood, Stone, or Bone. Or els make a hollow Cube, or Cubik coffen, of Copper, Siluer, Tynne, or Wood &c. These, you may so proportiõ in respect of your Pyramis or Cone, that the Pyramis or Cone, will be hable to conteine the waight of them, in water, 3. or 4. times: at the least: what stuff so euer they be made of. Let not your Solid angle, at the vertex, be to sharpe: but that the water may come with ease, to the very vertex, of your hollow Cone or Pyramis. Put one of your Solid Cubes in a Balance apt: take the waight therof exactly in water. Powre that water, (without losse) into the hollow Pyramis or Cone, quietly. Marke in your lines, what numbers the water Cutteth: Take the waight of the same Cube againe: in the same kinde of water, which you had before: put that* also, I. D.
* Consider well whan you must put your waters togyther: and whan, you must empty your first water, out of your Pyramis or Cone. Els you will erre.
into the Pyramis or Cone, where you did put the first. Marke now againe, in what number or place of the lines, the water Cutteth them. Two || wayes you may conclude your purpose: it is to wete, either by numbers or lines. By numbers: as, if you diuide the side of your Fundamentall Cube into so many æquall partes, as it is capable of, conueniently, with your ease, and precisenes of the diuision. For, as the number of your first and lesse line (in your hollow Pyramis or Cone,) is to the second or greater (both being counted from the vertex) so shall the number of the side of your Fundamentall Cube, be to the nũber belonging to the Radicall side, of the Cube, dubble to your Fundamentall Cube: Which being multiplied Cubik wise, will sone shew it selfe, whether it be dubble or no, to the Cubik number of your Fundamentall Cube. By lines, thus: As your lesse and first line, (in your hollow Pyramis or Cone,) is to the second or greater, so let the Radical side of your Fundamẽtall Cube, be to a fourth proportionall line, by the 12. proposition, of the sixth boke of Euclide. Which fourth line, shall be the Rote Cubik, or Radicall side of the Cube, dubble to your Fundamentall Cube: which is the thing we desired.   God be thanked for this Inuention, & the fruite ensuing. For this, may I (with ioy) say, ΕΥΡΗΚΑ, ΕΥΡΗΚΑ, ΕΥΡΗΚΑ: thanking the holy and glorious Trinity: hauing greater cause therto, then * Vitruuius. Lib. 9. Cap. 3. *Archimedes had (for finding the fraude vsed in the Kinges Crowne, of Gold): as all men may easily Iudge: by the diuersitie of the frute following of the one, and the other. Where I spake before, of a hollow Cubik Coffen: the like vse, is of it: and without waight. Thus. Fill it with water, precisely full, and poure that water into your Pyramis or Cone. And here note the lines cutting in your Pyramis or Cone. Againe, fill your coffen, like as you did before. Put that Water, also, to the first. Marke the second cutting of your lines. Now, as you proceded before, so must you here procede. * Note. *And if the Cube, which you should Double, be neuer so great: you haue, thus, the proportion (in small) betwene your two litle Cubes: And then, the side, of that great Cube (to be doubled) being the third, will haue the fourth, found, to it proportionall: by the 12. of the sixth of Euclide.

When you have found this one sure drop of natural truth, proceed to infer and properly test matters at hand. It is well established that a cylinder, whose height and diameter of its base is equal to the diameter of the sphere, is one and a half times the same sphere (that is, as 3 to 2). To the weight of the sphere, add half of that weight, and you will have the weight of that cylinder. This is also included in our previous cube. Thus, the base of that cylinder is a circle inscribed in the square, which is the base of our cube. But, since the cube and the cylinder have the same height, their bases are in the same proportion to each other in terms of their volume or solidity. Therefore, we have two numbers expressing their volumes, solidities, and quantities by weight; hence, we have * The ratio of the square to the inscribed circle. * the proportion of the square to the circle inscribed in the same square. And so we have entered the understandable, experimental knowledge of Archimedes' great secret, which he sought and found through considerable mental effort. Therefore, for any given circle, you can create an equal square: * The mechanical process of squaring the circle. * as I have taught in my annotation on the first proposition of the twelfth book. Likewise, for any given square, you can create an equal circle: For any square, draw a circle that has the same area. * If you draw a circle that is proportionate to your inscribed circle, as the square is to the same circle: this can be done by my annotations on the second proposition of the twelfth book of Euclid, in my third problem there. Your diligence can lead you to a proportion of the square to the inscribed circle that is closer to the truth than the proportion of 14 to 11. And consider that you may start with the circle and square, and thus conclude the relationship between the sphere and the cube, just as you did from the sphere to the circle. For, using silver, gold, or bronze sheets or plates (drawn through one hole, as is customary), if you create a square figure and weigh it: then, inscribing the circle within it, and carefully cutting off and filing away the excess of the square to the circle, you will then weigh your circle and see whether the weight of the square is to your circle as 14 to 11. As I noted at the beginning of Euclid's twelfth book. After this, refer to my last proposition on the last part of the twelfth. And there, help yourself to the end. And here, take note of this along the way. Note: Squaring the circle without understanding the ratio between circumference and diameter. That we may square the circle, without knowing the proportion of the circumference to the diameter: as you have perceived here. I can also demonstrate it in another way. Many have burdened themselves unnecessarily by focusing on that point first, which was not essential from the start, and also quite complex. It is easy to come to know the circumference, once the area of the circle is known. This I leave for your consideration, as I hasten to dispatch another major problem: to bring it closer to your knowledge and easier for you to handle than what the world has had for you up to this day, which I can tell of. And that is, A Mechanical Doubling of the Cube: &c. Which can be accomplished as follows: To easily double the cube: using mechanical methods based on mathematical proof. Make a square upright pyramid or cone using copper or tin plates, ensuring the interior is perfectly shaped. It's important to strive for mathematical perfection in these shapes as closely as possible. The bases should be completely open; otherwise, they should be tightly sealed. From the vertex to the edge of the base of the cone and to the sides of the base of the pyramid: I. D.
The four sides of this pyramid must be four equal isosceles triangles.
Draw four straight lines inside the cone and the pyramid, making equal angles with the edges of the bases where they meet. These four lines (in the pyramid, and the same in the cone) should divide one into 12 equal parts, another into 24, another into 60, and another into 100 (counting up from the vertex). You can use different numbers of divisions as you gain experience. Then,* I. D.
* In all operations involving this pyramid or cone, make sure their positions are consistent at all points and under all conditions while you work. Otherwise, you'll make mistakes.
Position your cone or pyramid with the point facing down, standing straight up on its base. (Even if it's placed differently, it won't cause any issues.) Ensure it is stable and secure. Now, if there is a cube that you want to double, create a neat cube from copper, silver, lead, tin, wood, stone, or bone. Alternatively, make a hollow cube or cubical coffin from copper, silver, tin, or wood, etc. You may design these in proportion to your pyramid or cone, so that the pyramid or cone can contain their weight in water at least 3 or 4 times, regardless of the material they are made from. Don't let your solid angle at the vertex be too sharp, so that the water can easily reach the very top of your hollow cone or pyramid. Place one of your solid cubes on a suitable balance and accurately take its weight in water. Pour that water (without loss) into the hollow pyramid or cone, quietly. Mark the lines where the water cuts through, then take the weight of the same cube again in the same kind of water that you had before; place that* also, I. D.
* Make sure to pay attention to when you should mix your waters and when you should discard the first water from your pyramid or cone. Otherwise, you might make a mistake.
into the pyramid or cone where you put the first batch. Now, mark again where the water intersects your marked lines. You can conclude your goal in two ways: either by numbers or by lines. By numbers: if you divide the side of your foundational cube into equal parts as it can conveniently be divided with your ease and precision of division. For, as the number of your first and smaller line (in your hollow pyramid or cone) is to the second or larger (both being counted from the vertex), so shall the number of the side of your foundational cube be to the number belonging to the radical side of the cube double your foundational cube. When cubed, this will quickly show whether it is double compared to the cubic number of your foundational cube. By lines: as your smaller and first line (in your hollow pyramid or cone) is to the second or larger, let the radical side of your foundational cube be to a fourth proportional line, by the 12th proposition of the sixth book of Euclid. This fourth line will be the cubic root or radical side of the cube double that of your foundational cube: which is what we desired. Thank God for this invention and the results that followed. For this, may I (with joy) say, Eureka, Eureka, Eureka: thanking the holy and glorious Trinity; having more cause to do so than * Vitruvius. Book 9. Chapter 3. * Archimedes had (for discovering the fraud used in the King's crown of gold): as anyone can easily judge by the differences in the results that follow from each case. Where I previously mentioned a hollow cubical coffin, it serves the same purpose, and without weight. Thus, fill it with water precisely to the top, and pour that water into your pyramid or cone. Again, mark the lines cutting through your pyramid or cone. Next, fill your coffin again just as before. Pour that water into the first batch. Note the second intersection of your lines. Now, as you proceeded before, so should you proceed here. * Note. * And if the cube that you want to double is ever so large: you now have, in small, the proportion between your two small cubes. Then, the side of that large cube (to be doubled), being the third, will have the fourth side proportional to it found, by the 12th of the sixth of Euclid.

Note, as concerning the Sphæricall Superficies of the Water. Note, that all this while, I forget not my first Proposition Staticall, here rehearsed: that, the Superficies of the water, is Sphæricall. Wherein, vse your discretion: to the first line, adding a small heare breadth, more: and to the second, halfe a heare breadth more, to his length. For, you will easily perceaue, that the difference can be no greater, in any Pyramis or Cone, of you to be handled. Which you shall thus trye. For finding the swelling of the water aboue leuell.   Square the Semidiameter, from the Centre of the earth, to your first Waters Superficies. Square then, halfe the Subtendent of that watry Superficies (which Subtendent must haue the equall partes of his measure, all one, with those of the Semidiameter of the earth to your watry Superficies): Subtracte this square, from the first: Of the residue, take the Rote Square. That Rote, Subtracte from your first Semidiameter of the earth to your watry Superficies: that, which remaineth, is the heith of the water, in the middle, aboue the leuell. Which, you will finde, to be a thing insensible. And though it were greatly sensible,* * Note. yet, by helpe of my sixt Theoreme vpon the last Proposition of Euclides twelfth booke, noted: you may reduce all, to a true Leuell. But, farther diligence, of you is to be vsed, against accidentall causes of the waters swelling: as by hauing (somwhat) with a moyst Sponge, before, made moyst your hollow Pyramis or Cone, will preuent an accidentall cause of Swelling, &c. Experience will teach you abundantly: with great ease, pleasure, and cõmoditie.

Note about the Spherical Surface of the Water. Remember, throughout this, I have not forgotten my initial static proposition: that the surface of the water is spherical. Use your judgment here: for the first line, add a small hair's breadth more, and to the second, add half a hair's breadth more to its length. You'll easily see that the difference cannot be greater in any pyramid or cone that you will manage. Here's how you can test this. To find the rise of the water above level. Square the radius from the center of the earth to your first water surface. Then square half the horizontal line of that watery surface (this horizontal line should have equal parts of its measure, the same as the radius of the earth to your watery surface): subtract this square from the first. From the remainder, take the square root. Subtract that root from your original radius of the earth to your watery surface: what remains is the height of the water in the middle above the level. You will find this to be something imperceptible. And even if it were significantly perceptible,* * Note. with the help of my sixth theorem on the last proposition of Euclid's twelfth book, noted: you can adjust everything to a true level. However, you must be diligent against accidental causes of the water's swelling, such as having (somewhat) moistened your hollow pyramid or cone with a damp sponge beforehand, which will prevent an accidental cause of swelling, etc. Experience will teach you abundantly, with great ease, enjoyment, and utility.

Thus, may you Double the Cube Mechanically, Treble it, and so forth, in any proportion. Note this Abridgement of Dubbling the Cube. &c. Now will I Abridge your paine, cost, and Care herein. Without all preparing of your Fundamentall Cubes: you may (alike) worke this Conclusion. For, that, was rather a kinde of Experimentall demõstration, then the shortest way: c.iij and all, vpon one Mathematicall Demonstration depending. Take water (as much as conueniently will serue your turne: as I warned before of your Fundamentall Cubes bignes) Way it precisely. Put that water, into your Pyramis or Cone. Of the same kinde of water, then take againe, the same waight you had before: put that likewise into the Pyramis or Cone. For, in eche time, your marking of the lines, how the Water doth cut them, shall geue you the proportion betwen the Radicall sides, of any two Cubes, wherof the one is Double to the other: working as before I haue taught you: * Note.   *sauing that for you Fundamentall Cube his Radicall side: here, you may take a right line, at pleasure.

So, you can mechanically Double the Cube, Treble it, and so on, in any proportion. Please see this summary of Doubling the Cube. &c. Now, I will simplify this for you and save you the pain, cost, and effort involved. Without preparing your Fundamental Cubes, you can still work with this conclusion in the same way. This was more of an experimental demonstration than the shortest method: c.iij and all depends on one mathematical demonstration. Take water (enough to serve your purpose, as I previously warned you about the size of your Fundamental Cubes). Measure it precisely. Put that water into your Pyramid or Cone. Then take the same weight of the same kind of water you had before and put that into the Pyramid or Cone as well. Each time, your markings on the lines showing how the water intersects them will give you the proportion between the radical sides of any two cubes, where one is double the other: work as I’ve taught you before: * Note. * Saving that for your Fundamental Cube’s radical side: here, you can take a straight line at your convenience.

Yet farther proceding with our droppe of Naturall truth: To giue Cubes one to the other in any proportion, Rationall or Irrationall. you may (now) geue Cubes, one to the other, in any proportiõ geuẽ: Rationall or Irrationall: on this maner. Make a hollow Parallelipipedon of Copper or Tinne: with one Base wãting, or open: as in our Cubike Coffen. Frõ the bottome of that Parallelipipedon, raise vp, many perpendiculars, in euery of his fower sides. Now if any proportion be assigned you, in right lines: Cut one of your perpendiculars (or a line equall to it, or lesse then it) likewise: by the 10. of the sixth of Euclide. And those two partes, set in two sundry lines of those perpendiculars (or you may set them both, in one line) making their beginninges, to be, at the base: and so their lengthes to extend vpward. Now, set your hollow Parallelipipedon, vpright, perpendicularly, steadie. Poure in water, handsomly, to the heith of your shorter line. Poure that water, into the hollow Pyramis or Cone. Marke the place of the rising. Settle your hollow Parallelipipedon againe. Poure water into it: vnto the heith of the second line, exactly. Poure that water* * Emptying the first. duely into the hollow Pyramis or Cone: Marke now againe, where the water cutteth the same line which you marked before. For, there, as the first marked line, is to the second: So shall the two Radicall sides be, one to the other, of any two Cubes: which, in their Soliditie, shall haue the same proportion, which was at the first assigned: were it Rationall or Irrationall.

Yet further proceeding with our drop of natural truth: To exchange cubes with each other in any quantity, whether rational or irrational. You can now exchange cubes with each other in any proportion, whether rational or irrational.: like this. Create a hollow rectangular box made of copper or tin: with one base left open, as in our cubic coffers. From the bottom of that rectangular box, raise up many vertical lines on each of its four sides. Now, if you are given any proportion in straight lines: Cut one of your verticals (or a line equal to it, or less than it) similarly, according to the 10th proposition in the sixth of Euclid. Place those two parts in two separate lines of those verticals (or you may place both in one line) starting at the base and extending upward. Now, set your hollow rectangular box upright, steady and vertical. Pour in water carefully, up to the height of your shorter line. Pour that water into the hollow pyramid or cone. Mark the level of the rise. Set your hollow rectangular box back down. Pour water into it: to the height of the second line exactly. Pour that water Emptying the first. properly into the hollow pyramid or cone: Again mark where the water intersects the same line you marked before. For there, as the first marked line is to the second: So shall the two radical sides be, one to the other, of any two cubes: which, in their solidity, will have the same proportion that was originally assigned, whether it is rational or irrational.

Thus, in sundry waies you may furnishe your selfe with such straunge and profitable matter: which, long hath bene wished for. And though it be Naturally done and Mechanically: yet hath it a good Demonstration Mathematicall. The demonstrations of this Dubbling of the Cube, and of the rest. Which is this: Alwaies, you haue two Like Pyramids: or two Like Cones, in the proportions assigned: and like Pyramids or Cones, are in proportion, one to the other, in the proportion of their Homologall sides (or lines) tripled. Wherefore, if to the first, and second lines, found in your hollow Pyramis or Cone, you ioyne a third and a fourth, in continuall proportion: that fourth line, shall be to the first, as the greater Pyramis or Cone, is to the lesse: by the 33. of the eleuenth of Euclide. If Pyramis to Pyramis, or Cone to Cone, be double, then shall* I. D.
* Hereby, helpe your self to become a præcise practiser. And so consider, how, nothing at all, you are hindred (sensibly) by the Conuexitie of the water.
Line to Line, be also double, &c. But, as our first line, is to the second, so is the Radicall side of our Fundamentall Cube, to the Radicall side of the Cube to be made, or to be doubled: and therefore, to those twaine also, a third and a fourth line, in continuall proportion, ioyned: will geue the fourth line in that proportion to the first, as our fourth Pyramidall, or Conike line, was to his first: but that was double, or treble, &c. as the Pyramids or Cones were, one to an other (as we haue proued) therfore, this fourth, shalbe also double or treble to the first, as the Pyramids or Cones were one to an other: But our made Cube, is described of the second in proportion, of the fower proportionall lines: therfore* * By the 33. of the eleuenth booke of Euclide. as the fourth line, is to the first, so is that Cube, to the first Cube: and we haue proued the fourth line, to be to the first, as the Pyramis or Cone, is to the Pyramis or Cone: Wherefore the Cube is || to the Cube, as Pyramis is to Pyramis, or Cone is to Cone. But we* I. D.
* And your diligence in practise, can so (in waight of water) performe it: Therefore, now, you are able to geue good reason of your whole doing.
Suppose Pyramis to Pyramis, or Cone to Cone, to be double or treble. &c. Therfore Cube, is to Cube, double, or treble, &c. Which was to be demonstrated. And of the Parallelipipedõ, it is euidẽt, that the water Solide Parallelipipedons, are one to the other, as their heithes are, seing they haue one base. Wherfore the Pyramids or Cones, made of those water Parallelipipedons, are one to the other, as the lines are (one to the other) betwene which, our proportion was assigned. But the Cubes made of lines, after the proportiõ of the Pyramidal or Conik homologall lines, are one to the other, as the Pyramides or Cones are, one to the other (as we before did proue) therfore, the Cubes made, shalbe one to the other, as the lines assigned, are one to the other: Which was to be demonstrated. Note. * Note this Corollary. *This, my Demonstratiõ is more generall, then onely in Square Pyramis or Cone: Consider well. Thus, haue I, both Mathematically and Mechanically, ben very long in wordes: yet (I trust) nothing tedious to them, who, to these thinges, are well affected. And verily I am forced (auoiding prolixitie) to omit sundry such things, easie to be practised: which to the Mathematicien, would be a great Threasure: and to the Mechanicien, no small gaine. * The great Commodities following of these new Inuentions. *Now may you, Betwene two lines giuen, finde two middle proportionals, in Continuall proportion: by the hollow Parallelipipedon, and the hollow Pyramis, or Cone. Now, any Parallelipipedon rectangle being giuen: thre right lines may be found, proportionall in any proportion assigned, of which, shal be produced a Parallelipipedon, æquall to the Parallelipipedon giuen. Hereof, I noted somwhat, vpon the 36. proposition, of the 11. boke of Euclide. Now, all those thinges, which Vitruuius in his Architecture, specified hable to be done, by dubbling of the Cube: Or, by finding of two middle proportionall lines, betwene two lines giuen, may easely be performed. Now, that Probleme, which I noted vnto you, in the end of my Addition, vpon the 34. of the 11. boke of Euclide, is proued possible. Now, may any regular body, be Transformed into an other, &c. Now, any regular body: any Sphere, yea any Mixt Solid: and (that more is) Irregular Solides, may be made (in any proportiõ assigned) like vnto the body, first giuen. Thus, of a Manneken, (as the Dutch Painters terme it) in the same Symmetrie, may a Giant be made: and that, with any gesture, by the Manneken vsed: and contrarywise. Now, may you, of any Mould, or Modell of a Ship, make one, of the same Mould (in any assigned proportion) bigger or lesser. Now, may you, of any * *Gunne, or little peece of ordinaũce, make an other, with the same Symmetrie (in all pointes) as great, and as little, as you will. Marke that: and thinke on it. Infinitely, may you apply this, so long sought for, and now so easily concluded: and withall, so willingly and frankly communicated to such, as faithfully deale with vertuous studies. Such is the Fruite of the Mathematicall Sciences and Artes. Thus, can the Mathematicall minde, deale Speculatiuely in his own Arte: and by good meanes, Mount aboue the cloudes and sterres: And thirdly, he can, by order, Descend, to frame Naturall thinges, to wonderfull vses: and when he list, retire home into his owne Centre: and there, prepare more Meanes, to Ascend or Descend by: and, all, to the glory of God, and our honest delectation in earth.

Thus, in various ways, you can equip yourself with intriguing and beneficial knowledge that has long been desired. Although it is accomplished naturally and mechanically, it still provides a solid mathematical demonstration. The demonstrations of this Doubling of the Cube and more. This means that you will always have two identical pyramids or two identical cones in the specified proportions, and similar pyramids or cones are proportionate to one another based on their homologous sides (or lines) multiplied by three. Therefore, if you take the first and second lines found in your hollow pyramid or cone and add a third and a fourth in continuous proportion, the fourth line will be to the first as the larger pyramid or cone is to the smaller one, according to the 33rd proposition of the eleventh book of Euclid. If the pyramid to pyramid or cone to cone is doubled, then I. D.
* Use this to help yourself become a precise practitioner. Remember, you are hardly affected (in a noticeable way) by the curve of the water.
Line to line will also be doubled, etc. However, as our first line relates to the second, so does the radical side of our foundational cube relate to the radical side of the cube to be created or doubled. Therefore, by adding a third and fourth line in continuous proportion to those two, you will get the fourth line in the same proportion to the first, as our fourth pyramidal or conical line was to its first; but that was doubled or tripled, etc., as the pyramids or cones were in relation to one another (as we have proven). Thus, this fourth will also be double or triple to the first, just like the pyramids or cones were to each other. However, our constructed cube is drawn from the second in proportion to the four proportional lines; hence * Based on the 33rd proposition of the eleventh book of Euclid. as the fourth line relates to the first, so does that cube relate to the first cube. We have proven that the fourth line is to the first as the pyramid or cone is to the pyramid or cone. Therefore, the cube is || to the cube as the pyramid is to the pyramid or the cone is to the cone. But we I. D.
* Your hard work in practice can achieve this in the weight of water: So, you can now provide a clear explanation of your entire process.
Suppose the pyramid to pyramid or cone to cone is double or triple, etc. Therefore, the cube is to the cube double or triple, etc. This was to be demonstrated. And concerning the parallelepiped, it is evident that the solid water parallelepipeds are proportional to one another as their heights are, since they have a common base. Therefore, the pyramids or cones formed from those water parallelepipeds are proportional to one another as the lines are (one to the other) between which our proportion was established. However, the cubes made from lines, following the proportion of the pyramidal or conical homologous lines, are also proportional to one another, just as the pyramids or cones are to each other (as we have previously proven). Thus, the cubes created will be proportional to one another, just as the assigned lines are proportional to one another: This was to be demonstrated. Note. * Note this follow-up. *This demonstration is more general than just in square pyramids or cones: Consider this carefully. Thus, I have been very lengthy both mathematically and mechanically: yet (I trust) not tedious to those who are well inclined towards these matters. And truly I am compelled (to avoid verbosity) to skip over many such things that are easy to practice, which would be a significant treasure for the mathematician and not a small gain for the mechanic. * The significant advantages that come from these new inventions. *Now you can, Between two given lines, find two middle proportionals in continuous proportion: using the hollow parallelepiped and the hollow pyramid or cone. Now, with any given rectangular parallelepiped, three straight lines can be found that are proportional in any assigned ratio, from which a parallelepiped will be produced that is equal to the given parallelepiped. I noted something about this in the 36th proposition of the 11th book of Euclid. Now, all those things that Vitruvius specified in his architecture that can be done by doubling the cube or by finding two middle proportional lines between two given lines can be easily performed. Now, the problem I mentioned to you at the end of my addition to the 34th of the 11th book of Euclid is proven possible. Now, any regular body can be transformed into another, etc. Now, any regular body, any sphere, even any mixed solid: and (more importantly) irregular solids can be made (in any assigned proportion) like the initially given body. Thus, from a mannequin, as the Dutch painters call it, a giant can be made in the same symmetry, and that with any gesture used by the mannequin: and vice versa. Now you can create a larger or smaller ship from any mold or model of a ship in the same mold (in any assigned proportion). Now, you can create another gun or small piece of artillery that has the same symmetry (in all details) as large or as small as you desire. Keep that in mind and reflect on it. Infinitely, You can now apply this long-desired knowledge, which is easily understood and generously shared with those who genuinely commit to meaningful learning. This is the benefit of the mathematical sciences and arts. Thus, a mathematical mind can deal speculatively in its own art: and through good means, rise above the clouds and stars: And thirdly, it can orderly descend to shape natural things for wonderful uses: and whenever it wishes, retire home into its own center: and there prepare further means to ascend or descend by: all for the glory of God, and our enjoyment on earth.

Although, the Printer, hath looked for this Præface, a day or two, yet could I not bring my pen from the paper, before I had giuen you comfortable warning, and brief instructions, of some of the Commodities, by Statike, hable to be reaped: In the rest, I will therfore, be as brief, as it is possible: and with all, describing them, somwhat accordingly. And that, you shall perceiue, by this, which in order commeth c.iiij next. For, wheras, it is so ample and wonderfull, that, an whole yeare long, one might finde fruitfull matter therin, to speake of: and also in practise, is a Threasure endeles: yet will I glanse ouer it, with wordes very few.

Although the printer has been waiting for this preface for a day or two, I couldn’t put my pen to paper before giving you some helpful advice and brief instructions about the benefits that can be gained from Statike. Therefore, I will be as concise as possible while describing them somewhat accordingly. You’ll see this in what comes next. It’s so extensive and remarkable that one could find fruitful topics to discuss for a whole year. In practice, it’s an endless treasure, yet I will touch on it with very few words.

THis do I call Anthropographie. Which is an Art restored, and of my preferment to your Seruice. I pray you, thinke of it, as of one of the chief pointes, of Humane knowledge. Although it be, but now, first Cõfirmed, with this new name: yet the matter, hath from the beginning, ben in consideration of all perfect Philosophers. Anthropographie, is the description of the Number, Measure, Waight, figure, Situation, and colour of euery diuerse thing, conteyned in the perfect body of MAN: with certain knowledge of the Symmetrie, figure, waight, Characterization, and due locall motion, of any parcell of the sayd body, assigned: and of Nũbers, to the sayd parcell appertainyng. This, is the one part of the Definition, mete for this place: Sufficient to notifie, the particularitie, and excellency of the Arte: and why it is, here, ascribed to the Mathematicals. Yf the description of the heauenly part of the world, had a peculier Art, called Astronomie: If the description of the earthly Globe, hath his peculier arte, called Geographie. If the Matching of both, hath his peculier Arte, called Cosmographie: Which is the Descriptiõ of the whole, and vniuersall frame of the world: Why should not the description of MAN is the Lesse World. him, who is the Lesse world: and, frõ the beginning, called Microcosmus (that is. The Lesse World.) And for whose sake, and seruice, all bodily creatures els, were created: Who, also, participateth with Spirites, and Angels: and is made to the Image and similitude of God: haue his peculier Art? and be called the Arte of Artes: rather, then, either to want a name, or to haue to base and impropre a name? You must of sundry professions, borow or challenge home, peculier partes hereof: and farder procede: as, God, Nature, Reason and Experience shall informe you. The Anatomistes will restore to you, some part: The Physiognomistes, some: The Chyromantistes some. The Metaposcopistes, some: The excellent, Albert Durer, a good part: the Arte of Perspectiue, will somwhat, for the Eye, helpe forward: Pythagoras, Hipocrates, Plato, Galenus, Meletius, & many other (in certaine thinges) will be Contributaries. And farder, the Heauen, the Earth, and all other Creatures, will eche shew, and offer their Harmonious seruice, to fill vp, that, which wanteth hereof: and with your own Experience, concluding: you may Methodically register the whole, for the posteritie: Whereby, good profe will be had, of our Harmonious, and Micro Cosmus. Microcosmicall constitution. * The outward Image, and vew hereof: to the Art of Zographie and Painting, to Sculpture, and Architecture: (for Church, House, Fort, or Ship) is most necessary and profitable: for that, it is the chiefe base and foundation of them. Looke in * Lib. 3. Cap. 1. *Vitruuius, whether I deale sincerely for your behoufe, or no. Looke in Albertus Durerus, De Symmetria humani Corporis. Looke in the 27. and 28. Chapters, of the second booke, De occulta Philosophia. Consider the Arke of Noe. And by that, wade farther. Remember the Delphicall Oracle NOSCE TEIPSVM (Knowe thy selfe) so long agoe pronounced: of so many a Philosopher repeated: and of the Wisest attempted: And then, you will perceaue, how long agoe, you haue bene called to the Schole, where this Arte might be learned. Well. I am nothing affrayde, of the disdayne of some such, as thinke Sciences and Artes, to be but Seuen. Perhaps, those Such, may, with ignorance, and shame enough, come short of them Seuen also: and yet neuerthelesse || they can not prescribe a certaine number of Artes: and in eche, certaine vnpassable boundes, to God, Nature, and mans Industrie. New Artes, dayly rise vp: and there was no such order taken, that,   All Artes, should in one age, or in one land, or of one man, be made knowen to the world. Let vs embrace the giftes of God, and wayes to wisedome, in this time of grace, from aboue, continually bestowed on them, who thankefully will receiue them: Et bonis Omnia Cooperabuntur in bonum.

This is what I call Human geography. It’s an art that has been revived, and I prefer to offer it to your service. Please consider it one of the key aspects of human knowledge. Although it’s just now being confirmed under this new name, the subject has been a topic of interest for all great philosophers since the beginning. Anthropography is the study of the quantity, size, weight, shape, location, and color of all the different aspects of the perfect human body. This includes a clear understanding of the symmetry, shape, weight, features, and proper local movement of each part of the body, as well as the measurements associated with that part. This is one part of the definition suitable for this context: sufficient to highlight the particularity and excellence of the art and explain why it is categorized here among the mathematical sciences. If the description of the celestial part of the world has a specific art called Astronomy; if the description of the earthly globe has its own specific art called Geography; if the combination of both has a specific art called Cosmography—which is the description of the entire and universal structure of the world—then why shouldn’t the description of MAN is the Lesser World. him, who is the lesser world, and from the beginning known as Microcosmos (which means The Less World), created for his sake and service, with whom all other bodily creatures were made, who also shares in the spirit and angels, and is made in the image and likeness of God, have its own specific art? Should it not be called the Art of Arts, rather than either lacking a name or being given a name that is too lowly and inappropriate? You must borrow or claim distinct parts of this from various professions and proceed further as God, nature, reason, and experience inform you. Anatomists will provide you with some insights; physiognomists will offer some; chiromancers will add some; metaphysicians will bring in some; the renowned Albert Durer will contribute significantly; the art of perspective will help to some extent for the eye; Pythagoras, Hippocrates, Plato, Galen, Meletius, and many others (in certain matters) will be contributors. Moreover, heaven, earth, and all other creatures will each show and offer their harmonious service to complete what is lacking in this regard: and by your own experience, you can systematically document the whole for future generations: thus, we will have strong proof of our harmonious and Micro Cosmos. microcosmic constitution. Understood! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize. The outward image and view of this: pertains to the art of Zography and painting, to sculpture and architecture (for churches, houses, forts, or ships) and is most necessary and beneficial as it serves as the primary base and foundation for them. Look in Understood. Please provide the text you would like me to modernize. Lib. 3. Cap. 1. Vitruvius, to see if I am dealing fairly for your benefit or not. Check out Albertus Durerus, De Symmetria humani Corporis. Check out chapters 27 and 28 of the second book, De occulta Philosophia. Consider the Ark of Noah. And from that, dive deeper. Remember the Delphic Oracle NOSCE TEIPSVM Know yourself that was proclaimed long ago, repeated by many philosophers, and sought by the Wisest: and then you will recognize how long ago you were called to the school where this art could be learned. Well, I am not at all afraid of the disdain from some who think sciences and arts are only seven in number. Perhaps those individuals, in their ignorance and enough shame, fall short of even those seven; yet still, they cannot prescribe a specific number of arts or establish certain unbreakable boundaries to God, nature, and human effort. New arts are emerging every day, and there has been no system put in place such that all arts should be known to the world in one age, or in one land, or by one person. Let us embrace the gifts of God and the paths to wisdom, continually bestowed from above in this time of grace, upon those who gratefully receive them: Et bonis Omnia Cooperabuntur in bonum.

Trochilike, is that Art Mathematicall, which demonstrateth the properties of all Circular motions, Simple and Compounde. And bycause the frute hereof, vulgarly receiued, is in Wheles, it hath the name of Trochilike: as a man would say, Whele Art. By this art, a Whele may be geuen which shall moue ones about, in any tyme assigned. Two Wheles may be giuen, whose turnynges about in one and the same tyme, (or equall tymes), shall haue, one to the other, any proportion appointed. By Wheles, may a straight line be described: Likewise, a Spirall line in plaine, Conicall Section lines, and other Irregular lines, at pleasure, may be drawen. These, and such like, are principall Conclusions of this Arte: and helpe forward many pleasant and profitable Mechanicall workes: Saw Milles. As Milles, to Saw great and very long Deale bordes, no man being by. Such haue I seene in Germany: and in the Citie of Prage: in the kingdome of Bohemia: Coyning Milles, Hand Milles for Corne grinding: And all maner of Milles, and Whele worke: By Winde, Smoke, Water, Waight, Spring, Man or Beast, moued. Take in your hand, Agricola De re Metallica: and then shall you (in all Mines) perceaue, how great nede is, of Whele worke. By Wheles, straunge workes and incredible, are done: as will, in other Artes hereafter, appeare. A wonderfull example of farther possibilitie, and present commoditie, was sene in my time, in a certaine Instrument: which by the Inuenter and Artificer (before) was solde for xx. Talentes of Golde: and then had (by misfortune) receaued some iniurie and hurt: And one Ianellus of Cremona did mend the same, and presented it vnto the Emperour Charles the fifth. Hieronymus Cardanus, can be my witnesse, that therein, was one Whele, which moued, and that, in such rate, that, in 7000. yeares onely, his owne periode should be finished. A thing almost incredible: But how farre, I keepe me within my boundes: very many men (yet aliue) can tell.

Hummingbird-like, is the mathematical discipline that shows the characteristics of all circular movements, whether simple or complex. And because the results of this art, commonly accepted, are in wheels, it is named Trochilike: as one might say, Wheel Art. With this art, one can create a wheel that will rotate around a point in any specified duration. Two wheels can also be created that will turn at the same time (or equal times), having a predetermined proportion to each other. Using wheels, a straight line can be drawn: similarly, a spiral line in a plane, conic sections, and other irregular lines can be drawn as desired. These, and similar concepts, are the main conclusions of this art and contribute to many enjoyable and useful mechanical works: Sawmills. Like mills used to saw large, long boards, with no one present. I have seen such things in Germany and in the city of Prague, in the kingdom of Bohemia: coin mills, hand mills for grinding grain, and all kinds of mills and wheel work: powered by wind, smoke, water, weight, spring, human, or animal. Take in your hand Agricola De re Metallica: and you will then see (in all mines) how great the need for wheel work is. Incredible and strange works are done by wheels: as will be shown in other arts later on. A remarkable example of further possibility and present practicality was seen in my time with a certain instrument, which was sold by the inventor and craftsman for twenty talents of gold, and then, by misfortune, it had received some damage. One Ianellus of Cremona repaired it and presented it to Emperor Charles the Fifth. Hieronymus Cardanus can attest that within that instrument was a wheel that turned so that, in 7,000 years, it would complete its own cycle. An almost unbelievable thing: But I limit myself to my scope: very many men (still alive) can confirm this.

Helicosophie, is nere Sister to Trochilike: and is, An Arte Mathematicall, which demonstrateth the designing of all Spirall lines in Plaine, on Cylinder, Cone, Sphære, Conoid, and Sphæroid, and their properties appertayning. The vse hereof, in Architecture, and diuerse Instrumentes and Engines, is most necessary. For, in many thinges, the Skrue worketh the feate, which, els, could not be performed. By helpe hereof, it is * Atheneus Lib. 5. cap. 8. *recorded, that, where all the power of the Citie of Syracusa, was not hable to moue a certaine Ship (being on ground) mightie Archimedes, setting to, his Skruish Engine, caused Hiero the king, by him self, at ease, to remoue her, as he would. Proclus. Pag. 18. Wherat, the King wondring: Απὸ τάυτης τῆς ἡμήρας, περὶ παντὸς, Αρχιμήδει λέγοντι πιϛευτέομ. From this day, forward (said the King) Credit ought to be giuen to Archimedes, what soeuer he sayth.

Helicosophy is closely related to Trochilike: and is A mathematical art that shows the design of all spiral lines on a plane, cylinder, cone, sphere, conoid, and spheroid, along with their related properties. Its use in architecture, and various instruments and machines, is very important. In many cases, the screw performs tasks that could not otherwise be accomplished. With its help, it is * Atheneus Book 5, Chapter 8. *recorded that, when the entire power of the city of Syracuse was unable to move a certain ship (which was aground), the mighty Archimedes, by using his screw engine, enabled Hiero the king to effortlessly move it himself, as he wished. Proclus. Page 18. The King, marveling at this, exclaimed: From this day on, about everything, Archimedes says it should be believed __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.. From this day forward (said the King), credit should be given to Archimedes for whatever he says.

Pneumatithmie demonstrateth by close hollow Geometricall Figures, (regular and irregular) the straunge properties (in motion or stay) of the Water, Ayre, Smoke, and Fire, in theyr cõtinuitie, d.j and as they are ioyned to the Elementes next them. This Arte, to the Naturall Philosopher, is very proffitable: to proue, that Vacuum, or Emptines is not in the world. And that, all Nature, abhorreth it so much: that, contrary to ordinary law, the Elementes will moue or stand. As, Water to ascend: rather then betwene him and Ayre, Space or place should be left, more then (naturally) that quãtitie of Ayre requireth, or can fill. Againe, Water to hang, and not descend: rather then by descending, to leaue Emptines at his backe. The like, is of Fire and Ayre: they will descend: when, either, their Cõtinuitie should be dissolued: or their next Element forced from them. And as they will not be extended, to discontinuitie: So, will they not, nor yet of mans force, can be prest or pent, in space, not sufficient and aunswerable to their bodily substance. Great force and violence will they vse, to enioy their naturall right and libertie. To go to the bottom of the Sea without daunger. Hereupon, two or three men together, by keping Ayre vnder a great Cauldron, and forcyng the same downe, orderly, may without harme descend to the Sea bottome: and continue there a tyme &c. Where, Note, how the thicker Element (as the Water) giueth place to the thynner (as, is the ayre:) and receiueth violence of the thinner, in maner. &c. Pumps and all maner of Bellowes, haue their ground of this Art: and many other straunge deuises. As, Hydraulica, Organes goyng by water. &c. Of this Feat, (called commonly Pneumatica,) goodly workes are extant, both in Greke, and Latin. With old and learned Schole men, it is called Scientia de pleno & vacuo.

Air pressure systems shows through detailed, hollow geometric shapes (both regular and irregular) the unusual properties (either in motion or at rest) of water, air, smoke, and fire, in their continuity, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ DJ and how they interact with the elements around them. This field is very beneficial to natural philosophers, as it proves that vacuum or emptiness does not exist in the world. All of nature strongly resists it to the extent that, contrary to natural laws, the elements will move or remain still. For example, water will rise rather than leave a space or gap between it and the air that exceeds the amount of air that naturally fills that space. Similarly, water will hang in place and not fall, preferring to stay rather than create emptiness behind it. The same applies to fire and air: they will descend only when their continuity is disrupted or when their neighboring element is forcibly taken away. Just as they will not allow discontinuity, they cannot be compressed or confined by human force in a space that does not match their physical substance. They will exert great force and violence to maintain their natural rights and freedom. To explore the depths of the ocean safely. With this in mind, two or three people can keep air trapped under a large cauldron and force it down carefully, allowing them to safely descend to the bottom of the sea and remain there for a while. Here, note how the denser element (like water) makes room for the lighter one (like air) and in turn experiences pressure from the lighter element. Pumps and all kinds of bellows derive from this art, along with many other fascinating inventions, such as hydraulics and water-powered organs. There are many notable works on this topic (commonly called pneumatics), both in Greek and Latin. In the tradition of ancient and learned scholars, it is known as scientia de pleno & vacuo.

Menadrie, is an Arte Mathematicall, which demonstrateth, how, aboue Natures vertue and power simple: Vertue and force may be multiplied: and so, to direct, to lift, to pull to, and to put or cast fro, any multiplied or simple, determined Vertue, Waight or Force: naturally, not, so, directible or moueable. Very much is this Art furdred by other Artes: as, in some pointes, by Perspectiue: in some, by Statike: in some, by Trochilike: and in other, by Helicosophie: and Pneumatithmie. By this Art, all Cranes, Gybbettes, & Ingines to lift vp, or to force any thing, any maner way, are ordred: and the certaine cause of their force, is knowne: As, the force which one man hath with the Duche waghen Racke: therwith, to set vp agayne, a mighty waghen laden, being ouerthrowne. The force of the Crossebow Racke, is certainly, here, demonstrated. The reason, why one mã, doth with a leauer, lift that, which Sixe men, with their handes onely, could not, so easily do. By this Arte, in our common Cranes in London, where powre is to Crane vp, the waight of 2000. pound: by two Wheles more (by good order added) Arte concludeth, that there may be Craned vp 200000. pound waight &c. So well knew Archimedes this Arte: that he alone, with his deuises and engynes, (twise or thrise) spoyled and discomfited the whole Army and Hoste of the Romaines, besieging Syracusa, Plutarchus in Marco Marcello. Marcus Marcellus the Consul, being their Generall Capitaine. Synesius in Epistolis. Such huge Stones, so many, with such force, and so farre, did he with his engynes hayle among them, out of the Citie. Polybius. Plinius. Quintilianus. T. Liuius. And by Sea likewise: though their Ships might come to the walls of Syracusa, yet hee vtterly confounded the Romaine Nauye. What with his mighty Stones hurlyng: what with Pikes of* * Athenæus. 18 fote long, made like shaftes: which he forced almost a quarter of a myle. What, with his catchyng hold of their Shyps, and hoysing them vp aboue the water, and suddenly letting them fall into the Sea againe: what with his* * Galenus. Anthemius. Burning Glasses: by which he fired their other Shippes a far-of: what, with his other pollicies, deuises, and engines, he so manfully acquit him selfe: that all the Force, courage, and pollicie of the Romaines (for a great season) || could nothing preuaile, for the winning of Syracusa. Wherupon, the Romanes named Archimedes, Briareus, and Centimanus. Zonaras maketh mention of one Proclus, who so well had perceiued Archimedes Arte of Menadrie, and had so well inuented of his owne, that with his Burning Glasses, Burning Glasses. being placed vpon the walles of Bysance, he multiplied so the heate of the Sunne, and directed the beames of the same against his enemies Nauie with such force, and so sodeinly (like lightening) that he burned and destroyed both man and ship. And Dionspecifieth of Priscus, a Geometricien in Bysance, who inuented and vsed sondry Engins, of Force multiplied: Which was cause, that the Emperour Seuerus pardoned him, his life, after he had wonne Bysance: Bycause he honored the Arte, wytt, and rare industrie of Priscus. But nothing inferior to the inuention of these engines of Force, was the inuention of Gunnes. Gunnes. Which, from an English man, had the occasion and order of first inuenting: though in an other land, and by other men, it was first executed. And they that should see the record, where the occasion and order generall, of Gunning, is first discoursed of, would thinke: that, small thinges, slight, and cõmon: comming to wise mens consideration, and industrious mens handling, may grow to be of force incredible.

Menagerieis a Mathematical Art that demonstrates how, beyond nature's basic strength and power, virtue and force can be amplified. This allows us to direct, elevate, pull, and throw any multiplied or simple, defined virtue, weight, or force that, by nature, cannot be managed or moved. This art is significantly enhanced by other disciplines: in some ways, by Perspective; in others, by Statics; in some areas, by Traction; and in others, by Helicosophy and Pneumatics. Through this art, all cranes, gallows, and machines designed to lift or move anything in various ways are organized, and the specific source of their force is understood. For example, the amount of force one person can exert using a Dutch wagon jack to lift a heavily loaded overturned wagon. The force generated by the mechanism of a crossbow is also illustrated here. It shows why one person can lift something with a lever that six men couldn’t lift easily by hand. Through this art, cranes in London, capable of lifting 2,000 pounds, can, with the addition of two more wheels (when arranged correctly), be able to lift up to 200,000 pounds, etc. Archimedes understood this art so well that, with his devices and machines, he single-handedly defeated the entire Roman Army besieging Syracuse, Plutarchus in Marco Marcello. Marcus Marcellus, the Consul, being their general. Synesius in Epistolis. He hurled such enormous stones, in such quantity and with such force, from the city. Polybius. Plinius. Quintilianus. T. Liuius. Even at sea, despite their ships reaching the walls of Syracuse, he completely outmatched the Roman navy. With his powerful stone projectiles and 18-foot long spikes designed like javelins, he launched them nearly a quarter-mile. He captured their ships, lifted them above the water, and then suddenly dropped them back into the sea. With his* * Athenæus. burning glasses that ignited their other ships from a distance, along with his various strategies, devices, and machines, he fought so bravely that the vast force, bravery, and tactics of the Romans || could not succeed in taking Syracuse. Consequently, the Romans referred to Archimedes as Briareus and Centimanus. Zonaras mentions a man named Proclus, who understood Archimedes's art of Menadrie so well and created his own innovations that, using his burning glasses placed on the walls of Byzantium, he focused the sun's heat, directing its rays against the enemy fleet with such intensity and swiftness (like lightning) that he burned and destroyed both soldiers and ships. Dion mentions Priscus, a Geometrician in Byzantium, who invented and utilized various machines of multiplied force, which led to Emperor Severus sparing his life after conquering Byzantium because he valued the art, intellect, and rare creativity of Priscus. However, nothing less significant than these machines of force was the invention of guns. Guns. Although the initial idea and design originated with an Englishman, it was executed in another country by other people. Those looking at the records that detail the common origin and design of firearms might think that, small, seemingly insignificant things, once taken seriously and handled by industrious people, can grow to possess incredible force.

Hypogeiodie, is an Arte Mathematicall, demonstratyng, how, vnder the Sphæricall Superficies of the earth, at any depth, to any perpendicular line assigned (whose distance from the perpendicular of the entrance: and the Azimuth, likewise, in respect of the said entrance, is knowen) certaine way may be præscribed and gone: And how, any way aboue the Superficies of the earth designed, may vnder earth, at any depth limited, be kept: goyng alwayes, perpendicularly, vnder the way, on earth designed: And, contrarywise, Any way, (straight or croked,) vnder the earth, beyng giuen: vppon the vtface, or Superficies of the earth, to Lyne out the same: So, as, from the Centre of the earth, perpendiculars drawen to the Sphæricall Superficies of the earth, shall precisely fall in the Correspondent pointes of those two wayes. This, with all other Cases and circumstances herein, and appertenances, this Arte demonstrateth. This Arte, is very ample in varietie of Conclusions: and very profitable sundry wayes to the Common Wealth. The occasion of my Inuenting this Arte, was at the request of two Gentlemen, who had a certaine worke (of gaine) vnder ground: and their groundes did ioyne ouer the worke: and by reason of the crokednes, diuers depthes, and heithes of the way vnder ground, they were in doubt, and at controuersie, vnder whose ground, as then, the worke was. The name onely (before this) was of me published, De Itinere Subterraneo: The rest, be at Gods will. For Pioners, Miners, Diggers for Mettalls, Stone, Cole, and for secrete passages vnder ground, betwene place and place (as this land hath diuerse) and for other purposes, any man may easily perceaue, both the great fruite of this Arte, and also in this Arte, the great aide of Geometrie.

Hypogeoidis a mathematical art that shows how, beneath the Earth's spherical surface, you can create and follow a specific route at any depth based on a given vertical line (with known distance from the vertical entry point and azimuth related to that entry point). It also illustrates how any above-ground path can be tracked underground at a set depth, while consistently staying directly below the designated surface path. On the other hand, for any underground path (whether straight or curved), it explains how to project that onto the Earth's surface. Therefore, from the center of the Earth, perpendicular lines drawn to the spherical surface will exactly intersect at corresponding points of those two paths. This art covers all these scenarios and their related elements. This art offers a wide variety of conclusions and is very beneficial in various ways to society. The reason I invented this art was at the request of two gentlemen who had a certain profit-driven project underground; their lands adjoined above the project, and due to the crookedness, various depths, and heights of the underground route, they were uncertain and in dispute over whose land the project was located. Previously, I had published the name De Itinere Subterraneo: the rest is up to God. For pioneers, miners, and diggers of metals, stone, coal, and for secret underground passages between locations (as this land has many), and for other purposes, anyone can easily see both the significant benefits of this art and the substantial help of geometry within it.

Hydragogie, demonstrateth the possible leading of Water, by Natures lawe, and by artificiall helpe, from any head (being a Spring, standing, or running Water) to any other place assigned. d.ij Long, hath this Arte bene in vse: and much thereof written: and very marueilous workes therein, performed: as may yet appeare, in Italy: by the Ruynes remaining of the Aqueductes. In other places, of Riuers leading through the Maine land, Nauigable many a Mile. And in other places, of the marueilous forcinges of Water to Ascend. which all, declare the great skill, to be required of him, who should in this Arte be perfecte, for all occasions of waters possible leading. To speake of the allowance of the Fall, for euery hundred foote: or of the Ventills (if the waters labour be farre, and great) I neede not: Seing, at hand (about vs) many expert men can sufficiently testifie, in effecte, the order: though the Demonstration of the Necessitie thereof, they know not: Nor yet, if they should be led, vp and downe, and about Mountaines, from the head of the Spring: and then, a place being assigned: and of them, to be demaunded, how low or high, that last place is, in respecte of the head, from which (so crokedly, and vp and downe) they be come: Perhaps, they would not, or could not, very redily, or nerely assoyle that question. Geometrie therefore, is necessary to Hydragogie. Of the sundry wayes to force water to ascend, eyther by Tympane, Kettell mills, Skrue, Ctesibike, or such like: in Vitruuius, Agricola, (and other,) fully, the maner may appeare. And so, thereby, also be most euident, how the Artes, of Pneumatithmie, Helicosophie, Statike, Trochilike, and Menadrie, come to the furniture of this, in Speculation, and to the Commoditie of the Common Wealth, in practise.

Hydragogyshows how to direct water, following natural laws and using artificial methods, from a source (such as a spring, still water, or moving water) to a specific location. d.ij This art has been in use for a long time, with much written about it and many remarkable works accomplished, as can still be seen in Italy by the ruins of aqueducts. In other areas, rivers have been navigated for many miles over land. In other cases, there are amazing methods to force water to rise, all of which show the great skill required to master this art for all possible situations involving water movement. There's no need for me to discuss the allowance of fall for every hundred feet or the vents (if the water's journey is long and demanding), since many experts around us can adequately testify to the process, even if they don't fully understand the necessity of it. Nor can they easily answer how low or high the final destination is compared to the source, especially after navigating through hills and valleys to reach that point. Therefore, Geometry is essential for Hydragogie. The various methods of forcing water to rise—whether through Tympane, Kettle mills, Screw, Ctesibius, or similar techniques—are clearly outlined in the works of Vitruvius, Agricola, and others. Thus, it becomes evident how the arts of Pneumatics, Helicosophy, Statics, Trochilic, and Menadrie contribute to this field, both in theory and in practical benefits for the community.

Horometrie, is an Arte Mathematicall, which demõstrateth, how, at all times appointed, the precise vsuall denominatiõ of time, may be knowen, for any place assigned. These wordes, are smoth and plaine easie Englishe, but the reach of their meaning, is farther, then you woulde lightly imagine. Some part of this Arte, was called in olde time, Gnomonice: and of late, Horologiographia: and in Englishe, may be termed, Dialling. Auncient is the vse, and more auncient, is the Inuention. The vse, doth well appeare to haue bene (at the least) aboue two thousand and three hundred yeare agoe: in* 4. Reg. 20. King Achaz Diall, then, by the Sunne, shewing the distinction of time. By Sunne, Mone, and Sterres, this Dialling may be performed, and the precise Time of day or night knowen. But the demonstratiue delineation of these Dialls, of all sortes, requireth good skill, both of Astronomie, and Geometrie Elementall, Sphæricall, Phænomenall, and Conikall. Then, to vse the groundes of the Arte, for any regular Superficies, in any place offred: and (in any possible apt position therof) theron, to describe (all maner of wayes) how, vsuall howers, may be (by the Sunnes shadow) truely determined: will be found no sleight Painters worke. So to Paint, and prescribe the Sunnes Motion, to the breadth of a heare. In this Feate (in my youth) I Inuented a way, How in any Horizontall, Murall, or Æquinoctiall Diall, &c. At all howers (the Sunne shining) the Signe and Degree ascendent, may be knowen. Which is a thing very necessary for the Rising of those fixed Sterres: whose Operation in the Ayre, is of great might, euidently. I speake no further, of the vse hereof. Bur forasmuch as, Mans affaires require knowledge of Times & Momentes, when, neither Sunne, Mone, or Sterre, can be sene: Therefore, by Industrie Mechanicall, was inuented, first, how, by Water, running orderly, the Time and howers might be knowen: whereof, the famous Ctesibius, was Inuentor: a man, of Vitruuius, to the Skie (iustly) extolled. Then, after that, by Sand running, were howers measured: Then, by Trochilike with waight: And of late time, by Trochilike with Spring: without waight. All these, || by Sunne or Sterres direction (in certaine time) require ouersight and reformation, according to the heauenly Æquinoctiall Motion: besides the inæqualitie of their owne Operation. There remayneth (without parabolicall meaning herein) among the Philosophers, A perpetuall Motion. a more excellent, more commodious, and more marueilous way, then all these: of hauing the motion of the Primouant (or first æquinoctiall motion,) by Nature and Arte, Imitated: which you shall (by furder search in waightier studyes) hereafter, vnderstand more of. And so, it is tyme to finish this Annotation, of Tymes distinction, vsed in our common, and priuate affaires: The commoditie wherof, no man would want, that can tell, how to bestow his tyme.

Timekeepingis a mathematical discipline that demonstrates how the standard division of time can be accurately determined for any specific location at any given moment. These words are smooth and straightforward English, but their meaning is deeper than you might readily think. Part of this art was once called Gnomonics; recently, it has been referred to as Horologiography; in English, it can be termed dialing. The use of this art is ancient, and its invention even older. The use clearly appears to have been established (at least) over two thousand three hundred years ago, in* 4. Reg. 20. King Ahaz's dial, which indicated the passage of time by the sun. By using the sun, moon, and stars, this dialing can be done, allowing the precise time of day or night to be known. However, accurately demonstrating these dials of all types requires good skills in both Astronomy and Geometry: elementary, spherical, phenomenological, and conical. Thus, to apply the fundamentals of the art to any regular surface in any offered location, and (in any suitable position) to depict (in all sorts of ways) how usual hours can be accurately determined (using the sun’s shadow) is no simple task. It involves producing and detailing the sun’s motion to the accuracy of a hair’s breadth. In this pursuit (during my youth), I invented a method to determine the sign and degree of the ascendant at any hour (when the sun is shining) on any horizontal, wall, or equinoctial dial, etc. This is very necessary for tracking the rise of fixed stars, whose influence in the atmosphere is quite significant. I won’t elaborate further on its uses. However, since human activities require knowledge of times and moments when neither the sun, moon, nor stars can be seen, it was through mechanical ingenuity that it was first invented how time and hours could be known by orderly running water, of which the famous Ctesibius was the inventor, a man justly praised by Vitruvius. Then, afterward, hours were measured with running sand; then, with a weight mechanism known as Trochilike; and more recently, by Trochilike with springs, without weights. All these, || require oversight and adjustment according to the celestial equinoctial motion at certain times, in addition to the irregularity of their own operation. There remains (without a metaphorical intent here) among philosophers, a perpetual motion machine. a more excellent, convenient, and remarkable method than all these: to have the motion of the primum movens (or first equinoctial motion) imitated by nature and art, which you will understand more about through further study in weightier topics later. Thus, it is time to conclude this annotation on the distinctions of time used in our common and private affairs: the benefits of which no one would want to miss, who knows how to manage their time effectively.

Zographie, is an Arte Mathematicall, which teacheth and demonstrateth, how, the Intersection of all visuall Pyramides, made by any playne assigned, (the Centre, distance, and lightes, beyng determined) may be, by lynes, and due propre colours, represented. A notable Arte, is this: and would require a whole Volume, to declare the property thereof: and the Commodities ensuyng. Great skill of Geometrie, Arithmetike, Perspectiue, and Anthropographie, with many other particular Artes, hath the Zographer, nede of, for his perfection. For, the most excellent Painter, (who is but the propre Mechanicien, & Imitator sensible, of the Zographer) hath atteined to such perfection, that Sense of Man and beast, haue iudged thinges painted, to be things naturall, and not artificiall: aliue, and not dead. This Mechanicall Zographer (commonly called the Painter) is meruailous in his skill: and seemeth to haue a certaine diuine power: As, of frendes absent, to make a frendly, present comfort: yea, and of frendes dead, to giue a continuall, silent presence: not onely with vs, but with our posteritie, for many Ages. And so procedyng, Consider, How, in Winter, he can shew you, the liuely vew of Sommers Ioy, and riches: and in Sommer, exhibite the countenance of Winters dolefull State, and nakednes. Cities, Townes, Fortes, Woodes, Armyes, yea whole Kingdomes (be they neuer so farre, or greate) can he, with ease, bring with him, home (to any mans Iudgement) as Paternes liuely, of the thinges rehearsed. In one little house, can he, enclose (with great pleasure of the beholders,) the portrayture liuely, of all visible Creatures, either on earth, or in the earth, liuing: or in the waters lying, Creping, slyding, or swimming: or of any foule, or fly, in the ayre flying. Nay, in respect of the Starres, the Skie, the Cloudes: yea, in the shew of the very light it selfe (that Diuine Creature) can he match our eyes Iudgement, most nerely. What a thing is this? thinges not yet being, he can represent so, as, at their being, the Picture shall seame (in maner) to haue Created them. To what Artificer, is not Picture, a great pleasure and Commoditie? Which of them all, will refuse the Direction and ayde of Picture? The Architect, the Goldsmith, and the Arras Weauer: of Picture, make great account. Our liuely Herbals, our portraitures of birdes, beastes, and fishes: and our curious Anatomies, which way, are they most perfectly made, or with most pleasure, of vs beholden? Is it not, by Picture onely? And if Picture, by the Industry of the Painter, be thus commodious and meruailous: what shall be thought of Zographie, the Scholemaster of Picture, and chief gouernor? Though I mencion not Sculpture, in my Table of Artes Mathematicall: yet may all men perceiue, How, that Picture and Sculpture, are Sisters germaine: and both, right profitable, in a Commõ wealth. and of Sculpture, aswell as of Picture, excellent Artificers haue written great bokes in commendation. Witnesse I take, of Georgio Vasari, Pittore Aretino: of Pomponius Gauricus: and other. To these two Artes, (with other,) is a certaine od Arte, called Althalmasat, much beholdyng: more, then the common Sculptor, Entayler, Keruer, Cutter, Grauer, Founder, d.iij or Paynter (&c) know their Arte, to be commodious.

Zographyis a mathematical art that teaches and shows how to represent the intersection of all visible pyramids created by a given plane, with the center, distance, and lighting defined using lines and suitable colors. This is an impressive art and would require a whole volume to explain its properties and the advantages that follow. A skilled Geometer, Arithmetic expert, Perspective specialist, and Anthropographer, among many other specific disciplines, are essential for a Zographer to achieve mastery. The most exceptional Painter, who is simply a skilled craftsman and perceptive imitator of the Zographer, has achieved such a level of skill that both humans and animals see painted objects as natural rather than artificial; alive rather than lifeless. This mechanical Zographer (commonly known as the Painter) is remarkable in their talents and seems to possess a sort of divine power: they can bring comfort from absent friends into a tangible form, and even provide a continuous, silent presence of deceased friends—not only with us but also with our descendants for many ages. Moreover, consider how, in winter, they can showcase the lively view of summer’s joy and abundance, and in summer, depict the bleakness and emptiness of winter. They can effortlessly bring cities, towns, forts, forests, armies, and even entire kingdoms—regardless of their distance or size—close to anyone's judgment as vibrant representations of those things. Within a small house, they can capture (to the great delight of viewers) the lively portrayal of all visible creatures, whether they live on land, underground, in water—crawling, sliding, or swimming—or any bird or insect flying in the air. In relation to the stars, the sky, and the clouds; indeed, in the very appearance of light itself (that divine entity), they can closely match what our eyes perceive. What an amazing thing this is! They can portray things that do not yet exist in such a way that, upon their existence, the picture seems to have, in a sense, created them. To which craftsman is a picture not a great pleasure and benefit? Who among them would refuse the guidance and support of an image? Architects, goldsmiths, and tapestry weavers hold great appreciation for pictures. Our vibrant herbal works, our portrayals of birds, beasts, and fish: how are they made most perfectly and with the greatest enjoyment for us to see? Is it not solely through pictures? And if pictures, created by the Painter's efforts, are thus beneficial and extraordinary, what should we conclude about Zographie, the master of pictures and chief governor? Although I do not include Sculpture in my list of mathematical arts, it is clear to everyone how Picture and Sculpture are closely related, both equally beneficial in society. Skilled artisans have written extensive works praising both Sculpture and Picture. I mention Giorgio Vasari, Pittore Aretino, Pomponius Gauricus, and others as evidence. Alongside these two arts, there exists a unique art known as Althalmasat, which holds more importance than what the typical Sculptor, Entailer, Carver, Cutter, Graver, Founder, d.iij or Painter (&c) acknowledge as valuable.

An objection. Architecture, to many may seme not worthy, or not mete, to be reckned among the Artes Mathematicall. To whom, I thinke good, to giue some account of my so doyng. Not worthy, (will they say,) bycause it is but for building, of a house, Pallace, Church, Forte, or such like, grosse workes. And you, also, defined the Artes Mathematicall, to be such, as dealed with no Materiall or corruptible thing: and also did demonstratiuely procede in their faculty, by Number or Magnitude. First, The Answer. you see, that I count, here, Architecture, among those Artes Mathematicall, which are Deriued from the Principals: and you know, that such, may deale with Naturall thinges, and sensible matter. Of which, some draw nerer, to the Simple and absolute Mathematicall Speculation, then other do.   And though, the Architect procureth, enformeth, & directeth, the Mechanicien, to handworke, & the building actuall, of house, Castell, or Pallace, and is chief Iudge of the same: yet, with him selfe (as chief Master and Architect,) remaineth the Demonstratiue reason and cause, of the Mechaniciens worke: in Lyne, plaine, and Solid: by Geometricall, Arithmeticall, Opticall, Musicall, Astronomicall, Cosmographicall (& to be brief) by all the former Deriued Artes Mathematicall, and other Naturall Artes, hable to be confirmed and stablished. If this be so: then, may you thinke, that Architecture, hath good and due allowance, in this honest Company of Artes Mathematicall Deriuatiue. I will, herein, craue Iudgement of two most perfect Architectes: the one, being Vitruuius, the Romaine: who did write ten bookes thereof, to the Emperour Augustus (in whose daies our Heauenly Archemaster, was borne): and the other, Leo Baptista Albertus, a Florentine: who also published ten bookes therof. Architectura (sayth Vitruuius) est Scientia pluribus disciplinis & varijs eruditionibus ornata: cuius Iudicio probantur omnia, quæ ab cæteris Artificibus perficiuntur opera. That is. Architecture, is a Science garnished with many doctrines & diuerse instructions: by whose Iudgement, all workes, by other workmen finished, are Iudged. It followeth. Ea nascitur ex Fabrica, & Ratiocinatione. &c. Ratiocinatio autem est, quæ, res fabricatas, Solertia ac ratione proportionis, demonstrare atque explicare potest. Architecture, groweth of Framing, and Reasoning. &c. Reasoning, is that, which of thinges framed, with forecast, and proportion: can make demonstration, and manifest declaration. Againe. Cùm, in omnibus enim rebus, tùm maximè etiam in Architectura, hæc duo insunt: quod significatur, & quod significat. Significatur proposita res, de qua dicitur: hanc autem Significat Demonstratio, rationibus doctrinarum explicata. Forasmuch as, in all thinges: therefore chiefly in Architecture, these two thinges are: the thing signified: and that which signifieth. The thing propounded, whereof we speake, is the thing Signified. But Demonstration, expressed with the reasons of diuerse doctrines, doth signifie the same thing. After that. Vt literatus sit, peritus Graphidos, eruditus Geometriæ, & Optices non ignarus: instructus Arithmetica: historias complures nouerit, Philosophos diligenter audiuerit: Musicam sciuerit: Medicinæ non sit ignarus, responsa Iurisperitorũ nouerit: Astrologiam, Cælique rationes cognitas habeat. An Architect (sayth he) ought to vnderstand Languages, to be skilfull of Painting, well instructed in Geometrie, not ignorant of Perspectiue, furnished with Arithmetike, haue knowledge of many histories, and diligently haue heard Philosophers, haue skill of Musike, not ignorant of Physike, know the aunsweres of Lawyers, and haue Astronomie, || and the courses Cælestiall, in good knowledge. He geueth reason, orderly, wherefore all these Artes, Doctrines, and Instructions, are requisite in an excellent Architect. And (for breuitie) omitting the Latin text, thus he hath. Secondly, it is behofefull for an Architect to haue the knowledge of Painting: that he may the more easilie fashion out, in patternes painted, the forme of what worke he liketh. And Geometrie, geueth to Architecture many helpes: and first teacheth the Vse of the Rule, and the Cumpasse: wherby (chiefly and easilie) the descriptions of Buildinges, are despatched in Groundplats: and the directions of Squires, Leuells, and Lines. Likewise, by Perspectiue, the Lightes of the heauen, are well led, in the buildinges: from certaine quarters of the world. By Arithmetike, the charges of Buildinges are summed together: the measures are expressed, and the hard questions of Symmetries, are by Geometricall Meanes and Methods discoursed on. &c. Besides this, of the Nature of thinges (which in Greke is called φυσιολογία) Philosophie doth make declaration. Which, it is necessary, for an Architect, with diligence to haue learned: because it hath many and diuers naturall questions: as specially, in Aqueductes. For in their courses, leadinges about, in the leuell ground, and in the mountinges, the naturall Spirites or breathes are ingendred diuers wayes: The hindrances, which they cause, no man can helpe, but he, which out of Philosophie, hath learned the originall causes of thinges. Likewise, who soeuer shall read Ctesibius, or Archimedes bookes, (and of others, who haue written such Rules) can not thinke, as they do: vnlesse he shall haue receaued of Philosophers, instructions in these thinges. And Musike he must nedes know: that he may haue vnderstanding, both of Regular and Mathematicall Musike: that he may temper well his Balistes, Catapultes, and Scorpions. &c. Moreouer, the Brasen Vessels, which in Theatres, are placed by Mathematicall order, in ambries, vnder the steppes: and the diuersities of the soundes (which ye Grecians call ηχεῖα) are ordred according to Musicall Symphonies & Harmonies: being distributed in ye Circuites, by Diatessaron, Diapente, and Diapason. That the conuenient voyce, of the players sound, whẽ it came to these preparations, made in order, there being increased: with yt increasing, might come more cleare & pleasant, to ye eares of the lokers on. &c. And of Astronomie, is knowẽ ye East, West, South, and North. The fashion of the heauen, the Æquinox, the Solsticie, and the course of the sterres. Which thinges, vnleast one know: he can not perceiue, any thyng at all, the reason of Horologies. Seyng therfore this ample Science, is garnished, beautified and stored, with so many and sundry skils and knowledges: I thinke, that none can iustly account them selues Architectes, of the suddeyne. But they onely, who from their childes yeares, ascendyng by these degrees of knowledges, beyng fostered vp with the atteynyng of many Languages and Artes, haue wonne to the high Tabernacle of Architecture. &c. And to whom Nature hath giuen such quicke Circumspection, sharpnes of witt, and Memorie, that they may be very absolutely skillfull in Geometrie, Astronomie, Musike, and the rest of the Artes Mathematicall: d.iiij Such, surmount and passe the callyng, and state, of Architectes: A Mathematicien. and are become Mathematiciens. &c. And they are found, seldome. As, in tymes past, was Aristarchus Samius: Philolaus, and Archytas, Tarentynes: Apollonius Pergęus: Eratosthenes Cyreneus: Archimedes, and Scopas, Syracusians. Who also, left to theyr posteritie, many Engines and Gnomonicall workes: by numbers and naturall meanes, inuented and declared.

An objection. Architecture might not seem, to many, worthy or appropriate to be counted among the Mathematical Arts. To those, I think it's good to provide some explanation for my reasoning. They might say it’s not worthy because it’s just about constructing a house, palace, church, fort, or similar heavy tasks. And you have also defined the Mathematical Arts as those that deal with nothing material or corruptible, and that demonstrate their principles through numbers or magnitudes. First, The Solution. you see that I include Architecture here among those Mathematical Arts derived from the principles, and you know that such arts can engage with natural things and tangible matter. Of these, some draw closer to simple and absolute mathematical speculation than others do. And even though the Architect directs and shapes the Mechanic to perform the actual construction of a house, castle, or palace, and is the chief judge of the same, within himself (as the chief Master and Architect) remains the demonstrative reasoning and cause of the mechanician’s work: in line, plain, and solid: through Geometric, Arithmetic, Optical, Musical, Astronomical, Cosmographical (and to be brief) by all the aforementioned derived Mathematical Arts and other natural arts, which are capable of being confirmed and established. If this is so, then you may believe that Architecture deserves good and appropriate recognition in this honorable company of derivative Mathematical Arts. I will, in this matter, seek the judgment of two remarkable Architects: one being Vitruvius, the Roman, who authored ten books on the subject for Emperor Augustus (in whose time our heavenly Master was born): and the other, Leo Baptista Alberti, a Florentine, who also published ten books on the topic. Architectura (says Vitruvius) is a science adorned with many disciplines and various instructions: by whose judgment, all works accomplished by other craftsmen are assessed. That is, Architecture is a field that incorporates various principles and teachings, through which we assess all the work done by other tradespeople. It continues. It arises from Craftsmanship and Reasoning. & c. Reasoning is that which can demonstrate and explain crafted things, through skill and the logic of proportion. Architecture is built on Framing and Reasoning. Reasoning is what can demonstrate and clarify the created objects, with foresight and balance. Again. In all matters, and especially in Architecture, these two elements exist: what is signified and what signifies. The propositional matter, about which we speak, is the thing signified. However, the demonstration explained with the reasons of various doctrines signifies the same thing. Following that, To be educated, skilled in Drawing, knowledgeable in Geometry and not ignorant of Perspective: instructed in Arithmetic: familiar with many histories, having diligently listened to Philosophers, having knowledge of Music, not ignorantly regarding Medicine, aware of the responses of legal experts, and having knowledge of Astronomy, An Architect (he says) should understand languages, be skilled in painting, have a solid grasp of geometry, know about perspective, be proficient in arithmetic, have knowledge of various histories, have attentively learned from philosophers, possess musical skills, be aware of physics, understand legal principles, and be knowledgeable in astronomy, || and the movements of the heavens, clearly understood. He gives orderly reasoning for why all these arts, doctrines, and instructions are necessary for an excellent Architect. And (for brevity), leaving out the Latin text, thus he has. Secondly, it's crucial for an architect to have knowledge of painting so that they can easily create patterns reflecting the design of the work they envision. Geometry offers many tools for architecture, mainly by teaching the use of a ruler and compass, which primarily facilitate the layout of buildings in ground plans and establish the directions of squares, levels, and lines. Similarly, perspective helps direct natural light into buildings from various angles around the world. Arithmetic adds up construction costs, outlines measurements, and addresses the intricate issues of symmetries through geometric means and methods. Additionally, philosophy uncovers the nature of things (which in Greek is called φυσιολογία). It's vital for an architect to have diligently studied this as it covers many different natural questions, especially about aqueducts. In their pathways across flat lands and hills, natural forces or breaths are generated in various ways, and only those who have learned philosophy can address the obstacles they create by understanding the original causes of things. Likewise, anyone reading the works of Ctesibius or Archimedes (and other authors of such guidelines) cannot think as they do unless they have learned from philosophers about these topics. An architect also needs to understand music—both regular and mathematical—to properly tune their ballistae, catapults, and scorpions. Furthermore, the bronze vessels placed in theaters, arranged mathematically in alcoves under the steps, and the variations of sounds (which the Greeks call ηχεῖα) are organized according to musical symphonies and harmonies; arranged in circuits by diatessaron, diapente, and diapason. The correct voice of the performers, when hitting these arranged notes, might resonate more clearly and pleasantly for the audience. Regarding astronomy, it's important to know the positions of east, west, south, and north, as well as the arrangement of the heavens, the equinox, the solstice, and the paths of the stars. Without this knowledge, one cannot understand anything about clock reasoning. Therefore, considering that this significant science is enriched, enhanced, and filled with such a variety of skills and knowledge, I believe no one can truly call themselves architects of the sudden. Only those who, from their youth, rise through these levels of knowledge, nurtured in the acquisition of many languages and arts, reach the heights of architecture. And for those whom nature has granted such keen insight, sharp wit, and memory, ensuring they can excel in geometry, astronomy, music, and other mathematical arts: d.iiij Such, exceed and go beyond the calling and role of Architects: A math expert. and have become mathematicians, etc. They are rarely found, just like Aristarchus of Samos, Philolaus, and Archytas of Tarentum were in the past: Apollonius of Perga, Eratosthenes of Cyrene, Archimedes, and Scopas of Syracuse. They also left behind many devices and gnomonic works, invented and explained using numbers and natural methods.

Thus much, and the same wordes (in sense) in one onely Chapter of this Incõparable Architect Vitruuius, shall you finde. And if you should, but take his boke in your hand, and slightly loke thorough it, you would say straight way: Vitruuius. This is Geometrie, Arithmetike, Astronomie, Musike, Anthropographie, Hydragogie, Horometrie. &c. and (to cõclude) the Storehouse of all workmãship. Now, let vs listen to our other Iudge, our Florentine, Leo Baptista: and narrowly consider, how he doth determine of Architecture. Sed anteque vltra progrediar. &c. But before I procede any further (sayth he) I thinke, that I ought to expresse, what man I would haue to bee allowed an Architect. For, I will not bryng in place a Carpenter: as though you might Compare him to the Chief Masters of other Artes. For the hand of the Carpenter, is the Architectes Instrument. VVho is an Architect. But I will appoint the Architect to be that man, who hath the skill, (by a certaine and meruailous meanes and way,) both in minde and Imagination to determine and also in worke to finish: what workes so euer, by motion of waight, and cuppling and framyng together of bodyes, may most aptly be Commodious for the worthiest Vses of Man. And that he may be able to performe these thinges, he hath nede of atteynyng and knowledge of the best, and most worthy thynges. &c. The whole Feate of Architecture in buildyng, consisteth in Lineamentes, and in Framyng. And the whole power and skill of Lineamentes, tendeth to this: that the right and absolute way may be had, of Coaptyng and ioyning Lines and angles: by which, the face of the buildyng or frame, may be comprehended and concluded. And it is the property of Lineamentes, to prescribe vnto buildynges, and euery part of them, an apt place, & certaine nũber: a worthy maner, and a semely order: that, so, ye whole forme and figure of the buildyng, may rest in the very Lineamentes. &c. And we may prescribe in mynde and imagination the whole formes,* * The Immaterialitie of perfect Architecture. all material stuffe beyng secluded. Which point we shall atteyne, by Notyng and forepointyng the angles, and lines, by a sure and certaine direction and connexion. Seyng then, these thinges, are thus: What, Lineament is. Lineamente, shalbe the certaine and constant prescribyng, conceiued in mynde: made in lines and angles: and finished with a learned minde and wyt. We thanke you Master Baptist, that you haue so aptly brought your Arte, and phrase therof, to haue some Mathematicall perfection: Note. by certaine order, nũber, forme, figure, and Symmetrie mentall: all naturall & sensible stuffe set a part. Now, then, it is euident, (Gentle reader) how aptely and worthely, I haue preferred Architecture, to be bred and fostered vp in the Dominion of the pereles Princesse, Mathematica: and to be a naturall Subiect of hers. And the name of Architecture, is of the principalitie, which this Science hath, aboue all other Artes. And Plato affirmeth, the Architect to be Master ouer all, that make any worke. Wherupon, he is neither Smith, nor Builder: nor, separately, any Artificer: but the || Hed, the Prouost, the Directer, and Iudge of all Artificiall workes, and all Artificers. For, the true Architect, is hable to teach, Demonstrate, distribute, describe, and Iudge all workes wrought. And he, onely, searcheth out the causes and reasons of all Artificiall thynges. Thus excellent, is Architecture: though few (in our dayes) atteyne thereto: yet may not the Arte, be otherwise thought on, then in very dede it is worthy. Nor we may not, of auncient Artes, make new and imperfect Definitions in our dayes: for scarsitie of Artificers: No more, than we may pynche in, the Definitions of Wisedome, or Honestie, or of Frendeshyp or of Iustice. No more will I consent, to Diminish any whit, of the perfection and dignitie, (by iust cause) allowed to absolute Architecture. Vnder the Direction of this Arte, are thre principall, necessary Mechanicall Artes. Namely, Howsing, Fortification, and Naupegie. Howsing, I vnderstand, both for Diuine Seruice, and Mans common vsage: publike, and priuate. Of Fortification and Naupegie, straunge matter might be told you: But perchaunce, some will be tyred, with this Bederoll, all ready rehearsed: and other some, will nycely nip my grosse and homely discoursing with you: made in post hast: for feare you should wante this true and frendly warnyng, and tast giuyng, of the Power Mathematicall. Lyfe is short, and vncertaine: Tymes are perilouse: &c. And still the Printer awayting, for my pen staying: All these thinges, with farder matter of Ingratefulnes, giue me occasion to passe away, to the other Artes remainyng, with all spede possible.

Thus much, and the same words (in meaning) in just one Chapter of this incomparable Architect Vitruvius, you shall find. And if you merely take his book in your hand and glance through it, you would immediately say: Vitruvius. This is Geometry, Arithmetic, Astronomy, Music, Anthropography, Hydraulics, Timekeeping, &c. and (to conclude) the Storehouse of all craftsmanship. Now, let us listen to our other judge, our Florentine, Leon Battista: and carefully consider how he defines Architecture. Sed anteque ulterius progrediar. & c. But before I go any further (he says) I believe I should clarify what kind of person qualifies as an Architect. I'm not going to include a Carpenter in this conversation, as if you could compare them to the leading Masters of other trades. The Carpenter's hands are the tools of the Architect. What is an Architect? But I define the Architect as that person who has the skill, (by certain and wonderful means,) both in mind and imagination to determine and also in work to complete: whatever works, by the motion of weight, and coupling and framing together of bodies, may be most appropriately suitable for the noblest uses of man. To do this, they need to gain knowledge of the best and most worthy things. The entire task of Architecture in building involves shapes and framing. The whole capability and skill of shapes aim to provide the right and absolute method of joining lines and angles, allowing us to understand and conclude the appearance of the building or frame. Shapes naturally assign buildings and every part of them a suitable place and a specific number: an appropriate manner and an orderly arrangement, so that the overall form and figure of the building depend on these shapes. And we can visualize in our minds and imaginations the whole forms.** The Intangibility of Perfect Architecture. while leaving out all physical things. We'll get to this point by marking and outlining the angles and lines with a clear and definite direction and connection. So, considering that these things are like this: What is shape? Shapes will be the definite and consistent guidelines, imagined in thought: formed by lines and angles: and finished with knowledge and intelligence. We thank you, Master Baptista, for so aptly bringing your art and its terminology to have some mathematical perfection: Note. by certain order, number, form, figure, and Symmetry mental: all natural and sensible materials set aside. Now, then, it is evident, (Gentle reader) how appropriately and worthily I have elevated Architecture to be nurtured in the realm of the peerless Princess, Mathematics: and to be a natural subject of hers. The term Architecture signifies the authority that this Science possesses above all other Arts. And Plato asserts that the Architect is the Master over all who create any work. Thus, he is neither a Blacksmith nor a Builder: nor, separately, any Artificer: but the || Head, the Provost, the Director, and Judge of all Artificial works, and all Artificers. For the true Architect is capable of teaching, demonstrating, distributing, describing, and judging all works created. And he alone seeks out the causes and reasons for all artificial things. Thus excellent is Architecture: though few (in our days) achieve it: it cannot be otherwise considered than it truly deserves. Nor can we create new and imperfect definitions of ancient Arts in our times due to a shortage of Artificers: no more than we can diminish the Definitions of Wisdom, or Honesty, or of Friendship, or of Justice. Neither will I agree to lessen any degree of perfection and dignity, (by just cause) attributed to true Architecture. Under the Direction of this Art, there are three principal, necessary Mechanical Arts. Namely, Housing, Fortification, and Nautical Navigation. Housing, I understand, refers to both Divine Service and man's common usage: public and private. Regarding Fortification and Nautical Navigation, strange matters could be shared with you: But perhaps some will be tired of this list I've already mentioned: and others will delicately critique my rough and hurried discussion with you: made in haste: for fear you might lack this true and friendly warning, and taste of the Mathematical Power. Life is short and uncertain: Times are perilous: &c. And still, the Printer awaits, for my pen is paused: All these things, along with further matters of ingratitude, prompt me to move on to the other remaining Arts as swiftly as possible.

THe Arte of Nauigation, demonstrateth how, by the shortest good way, by the aptest Directiõ, & in the shortest time, a sufficient Ship, betwene any two places (in passage Nauigable,) assigned: may be cõducted: and in all stormes, & naturall disturbances chauncyng, how, to vse the best possible meanes, whereby to recouer the place first assigned. What nede, the Master Pilote, hath of other Artes, here before recited, it is easie to know: as, of Hydrographie, Astronomie, Astrologie, and Horometrie. Presupposing continually, the common Base, and foundacion of all: namely Arithmetike and Geometrie. So that, he be hable to vnderstand, and Iudge his own necessary Instrumentes, and furniture Necessary: Whether they be perfectly made or no: and also can, (if nede be) make them, hym selfe. As Quadrantes, The Astronomers Ryng, The Astronomers staffe, The Astrolabe vniuersall. An Hydrographicall Globe. Charts Hydrographicall, true, (not with parallell Meridians). The Common Sea Compas: The Compas of variacion: The Proportionall, and Paradoxall Compasses Anno. 1559. (of me Inuented, for our two Moscouy Master Pilotes, at the request of the Company) Clockes with spryng: houre, halfe houre, and three houre Sandglasses: & sundry other Instrumẽtes: And also, be hable, on Globe, or Playne to describe the Paradoxall Compasse: and duely to vse the same, to all maner of purposes, whereto it was inuented. And also, be hable to Calculate the Planetes places for all tymes.

The Art ofNavigationdemonstrates how to navigate a capable ship between any two navigable locations using the shortest and most efficient route in the least amount of time. It also teaches how to employ the best strategies to reach the intended destination during storms and natural disturbances. It's easy to see why the Master Pilot needs other skills mentioned earlier, such as Hydrography, Astronomy, Astrology, and Horometry. All of this is based on the common foundation of Arithmetic and Geometry. They must be able to understand and assess their own necessary instruments and equipment, determining whether they are well-made. If necessary, they should also be able to craft them themselves, including Quadrants, the Astronomer’s Ring, the Astronomer’s staff, the universal Astrolabe, a hydrographic globe, accurate hydrographic charts (not with parallel meridians), the standard sea compass, the variation compass, and the proportional and paradoxical compasses. Year 1559. (invented by me for our two Moscow master pilots at the request of the Company) clocks with springs, hour, half-hour, and three-hour sandglasses, and various other instruments. They should also be capable of describing the paradoxical compass on a globe or flat surface and using it appropriately for all intended purposes. Additionally, they should be able to calculate the positions of the planets at any time.

Moreouer, with Sonne Mone or Sterre (or without) be hable to define the Longitude & Latitude of the place, which he is in: So that, the Longitude & Latitude of the place, from which he sayled, be giuen: or by him, be knowne. whereto, appertayneth expert meanes, to be certified euer, of the Ships way. &c. And by foreseing the Rising, Settyng, Nonestedyng, or Midnightyng of certaine tempestuous fixed Sterres: or their Coniunctions, and Anglynges with the Planetes, &c. he ought to haue expert coniecture of Stormes, Tempestes, and Spoutes: and such lyke Meteorologicall effectes, daungerous on Sea. For (as Plato sayth,) Mutationes, A.j opportunitatesque temporum presentire, non minus rei militari, quàm Agriculturæ, Nauigationique conuenit. To foresee the alterations and opportunities of tymes, is conuenient, no lesse to the Art of Warre, then to Husbandry and Nauigation. And besides such cunnyng meanes, more euident tokens in Sonne and Mone, ought of hym to be knowen: such as (the Philosophicall Poëte) Virgilius teacheth, in hys Georgikes. Where he sayth,C

Moreover, with the Sun, Moon, or stars (or even without them), one should be able to determine the longitude and latitude of their current location. This includes knowing the longitude and latitude of the place from which they sailed, whether provided or known by them. There are expert methods to always be informed of the ship's course, etc. By anticipating the rising, setting, noon, or midnight positions of certain stormy fixed stars, or their conjunctions and angles with the planets, they should have an educated guess about storms, tempests, and squalls, as well as other meteorological phenomena that can be dangerous at sea. For, as Plato says, “To foresee the changes and opportunities of times is important, not only for military matters but also for agriculture and navigation.” In addition to such clever methods, one should be aware of clearer signs from the Sun and Moon, such as those taught by the philosophical poet Virgil in his Georgics. Where he says, C

Sol quoque & exoriens & quum se condet in vndas,

Sol quoque & exoriens & quum se condet in vndas,

Signa dabit, Solem certissima signa sequuntur. &c.

Sign will be given, the sun surely follows the signs. &c.

Georgic. 1.

    ———— Nam sæpe videmus,

Nam sæpe videmus,

Ipsius in vultu varios errare colores.

Colors in his face.

Cæruleus, pluuiam denunciat, igneus Euros.

The blue warns of rain, fiery east wind.

Sin maculæ incipient rutilo immiscerier igni,

Sin maculæ incipient rutilo immiscerier igni,

Omnia tum pariter vento, nimbisque videbis

You'll see everything together in the wind and clouds.

Feruere: non illa quisquam me nocte per altum

Feruere: not anyone during the night in the deep

Ire, neque a terra moueat conuellere funem. &c.

Ire, neque a terra moueat conuellere funem. &c.

Sol tibi signa dabit. Solem quis dicere falsum

Sol tibi signa dabit. Solem quis dicere falsum

Audeat? ———— &c.

Audeat? ———— &c.

And so of Mone, Sterres, Water, Ayre, Fire, Wood, Stones, Birdes, and Beastes, and of many thynges els, a certaine Sympathicall forewarnyng may be had: sometymes to great pleasure and proffit, both on Sea and Land. Sufficiently, for my present purpose, it doth appeare, by the premisses, how Mathematicall, the Arte of Nauigation, is: and how it nedeth and also vseth other Mathematicall Artes: And now, if I would go about to speake of the manifold Commodities, commyng to this Land, and others, by Shypps and Nauigation, you might thinke, that I catch at occasions, to vse many wordes, where no nede is.

And so, regarding money, stars, water, air, fire, wood, stones, birds, and animals, as well as many other things, we can get a certain sympathetic warning: sometimes for great pleasure and benefit, both at sea and on land. For my current purpose, it's clear from the previous points how mathematical the art of navigation is and how it requires and also uses other mathematical arts: And now, if I were to discuss the many benefits that come to this country and others through ships and navigation, you might think I’m looking for opportunities to use many words where it isn’t necessary.

Yet, this one thyng may I, (iustly) say. In Nauigation, none ought to haue greater care, to be skillfull, then our English Pylotes. And perchaunce, Some, would more attempt: And other Some, more willingly would be aydyng, it they wist certainely, What Priuiledge, God had endued this Iland with, by reason of Situation, most commodious for Nauigation, to Places most Famous & Riche. And though, * Anno. 1567 S. H. G. (of* Late) a young Gentleman, a Courragious Capitaine, was in a great readynes, with good hope, and great causes of persuasion, to haue ventured, for a Discouerye, (either Westerly, by Cape de Paramantia: or Esterly, aboue Noua Zemla, and the Cyremisses) and was, at the very nere tyme of Attemptyng, called and employed otherwise (both then, and since,) in great good seruice to his Countrey, as the Irish Rebels haue *tasted: * Anno. 1569 Yet, I say, (though the same Gentleman, doo not hereafter, deale therewith) Some one, or other, should listen to the Matter: and by good aduise, and discrete Circumspection, by little, and little, wynne to the sufficient knowledge of that Trade and Voyage: Which, now, I would be sory, (through Carelesnesse, want of Skill, and Courrage,) should remayne Vnknowne and vnheard of. Seyng, also, we are herein, halfe Challenged, by the learned, by halfe request, published. Therof, verely, might grow Commoditye, to this Land chiefly, and to the rest of the Christen Common wealth, farre passing all riches and worldly Threasure.

Yet, there’s one thing I can justly say. In Navigating, no one should take more care to be skilled than our English pilots. And perhaps some would be more willing to attempt it, while others would gladly help if they knew for sure what privileges God has granted this island because of its ideal location for Navigating to the most famous and wealthy places. And even though, * Year 1567 S. H. G. (recently) a young gentleman, a courageous captain, was ready and hopeful, with strong reasons to persuade him, to take a risk for a discovery (either west by Cape de Paramantia or east above Nova Zemla and the Cyremisses), he was just about to attempt it when he was called away and given other important duties (both then and since) in great service to his country, as the Irish rebels have experienced: * Year 1569 Yet, I say, (even if that gentleman doesn't deal with it in the future) someone should pay attention to the matter and, with good advice and thoughtful caution, gradually gain sufficient knowledge of that trade and trip: which I would regret, (due to carelessness, lack of skill, and courage) should remain unknown and unheard of. Seeing, too, that we are half challenged by the learned, published by half a request. From this, there could truly arise a great benefit for this land, and for the rest of the Christian commonwealth, far surpassing all riches and worldly treasure.

Thaumaturgike, is that Art Mathematicall, which giueth certaine order to make straunge workes, of the sense to be perceiued, and of men greatly to be wondred at. By sundry meanes, this Wonder-worke is wrought. Some, by Pneumatithmie. As the workes of Ctesibius and Hero, || Some by waight. wherof Timæus speaketh. Some, by Stringes strayned, or Springs, therwith Imitating liuely Motions. Some, by other meanes, as the Images of Mercurie: and the brasen hed, made by Albertus Magnus, which dyd seme to speake. Boethius was excellent in these feates. To whom, Cassiodorus writyng, sayth. Your purpose is to know profound thynges: and to shew meruayles. By the disposition of your Arte, Metals do low: Diomedes of brasse, doth blow a Trumpet loude: a brasen Serpent hisseth: byrdes made, sing swetely. Small thynges we rehearse of you, who can Imitate the heauen. &c. Of the straunge Selfmouyng, which, at Saint Denys, by Paris, * Anno. 1551 *I saw, ones or twise (Orontius beyng then with me, in Company) it were to straunge to tell. But some haue written it. And yet, (I hope) it is there, of other to be sene. And by Perspectiue also straunge thinges, are done. As partly (before) I gaue you to vnderstand in Perspectiue. As, to see in the Ayre, a loft, the lyuely Image of an other man, either walkyng to and fro: or standyng still. Likewise, to come into an house, and there to see the liuely shew of Gold, Siluer or precious stones: and commyng to take them in your hand, to finde nought but Ayre. Hereby, haue some men (in all other matters counted wise) fouly ouershot thẽ selues: misdeaming of the meanes. Therfore sayd Claudius Cælestinus. De his quæ Mundo mirabiliter eueniunt. cap. 8. Hodie magnæ literaturæ viros & magna reputationis videmus, opera quedam quasi miranda, supra Naturã putare: de quibus in Perspectiua doctus causam faciliter reddidisset. That is. Now a dayes, we see some men, yea of great learnyng and reputation, to Iudge certain workes as meruaylous, aboue the power of Nature: Of which workes, one that were skillfull in Perspectiue might easely haue giuen the Cause. Of Archimedes Sphære, Cicero witnesseth. Tusc. 1. Which is very straunge to thinke on. For when Archimedes (sayth he) did fasten in a Sphære, the mouynges of the Sonne, Mone, and of the fiue other Planets, he did, as the God, which (in Timæus of Plato) did make the world. That, one turnyng, should rule motions most vnlike in slownes, and swiftnes. But a greater cause of meruayling we haue by Claudianus report hereof. Who affirmeth this Archimedes worke, to haue ben of Glasse. And discourseth of it more at large: which I omit. The Doue of wood, which the Mathematicien Archytas did make to flye, is by Agellius spoken of. Of Dædalus straunge Images, Plato reporteth. Homere of Vulcans Selfmouers, (by secret wheles) leaueth in writyng. Aristotle, in hys Politikes, of both, maketh mention. Meruaylous was the workemanshyp, of late dayes, performed by good skill of Trochilike. &c. For in Noremberge, A flye of Iern, beyng let out of the Artificers hand, did (as it were) fly about by the gestes, at the table, and at length, as though it were weary, retourne to his masters hand agayne. Moreouer, an Artificiall Egle, was ordred, to fly out of the same Towne, a mighty way, and that a loft in the Ayre, toward the Emperour comming thether: and followed hym, beyng come to the gate of the towne.* Thus, you see, what, Arte Mathematicall can performe, when Skill, will, Industry, and Hability, are duely applyed to profe.

Magicis the mathematical art that arranges processes to create amazing works that can be experienced by the senses and are highly admired by people. This Wonder-work is accomplished through various means. Some examples are Pneumatithmie, like the inventions of Ctesibius and Hero, || some by weight, as discussed by Timæus. Others use strings or springs to mimic lively motions. There are also different methods, such as the images of Mercury and the brass head created by Albertus Magnus, which seemed to speak. Boethius excelled in these feats, and Cassiodorus wrote about him, saying: Your goal is to grasp deep truths and to showcase amazing things. Through your art, metals come to life: the brass Diomedes blares a loud trumpet, the brass serpent hisses, and created birds sing beautifully. We highlight just a few of your accomplishments; who can replicate the heavens, etc. Regarding the strange self-moving objects that I saw once or twice in Saint Denis, near Paris, when Orontius was with me, it would be too strange to describe. But some have written about it, and I hope it is still there for others to see. Also, through Perspectiue, strange things can be accomplished. As I partly explained to you before in Perspectiue, like seeing the lively image of another person in the air, either walking back and forth or standing still. Similarly, entering a house and seeing a realistic display of gold, silver, or precious stones, only to find that when you reach for them, there's nothing but air. Because of this, some people, who are otherwise considered wise, have severely misjudged the means. Thus, Claudius Cælestinus remarked: On the extraordinary events that occur in the world. Chapter 8. Nowadays, we see some men, even those of great learning and reputation, judging certain works as marvelous, beyond the power of nature: of which a skilled person in perspective could easily explain the cause. Regarding Archimedes' Sphere, Cicero affirms: Tuscany 1. When Archimedes (he says) linked the movements of the sun, moon, and the five other planets in a sphere, he resembled the god who (in Plato's Timæus) created the universe. This enabled a single rotation to control motions that vary greatly in speed and slowness. But we have an even greater reason to marvel, as reported by Claudianus, who states that this Archimedes' work was made of glass, and he discusses it further, which I will not cover here. The wooden dove that the mathematician Archytas made to fly is mentioned by Agellius. Plato recounts the strange images of Dædalus, and Homer writes about Vulcan's self-movers (activated by hidden wheels). Aristotle refers to both in his Politikes. The craftsmanship of recent days, showcased by skilled Trochilike, is impressive. For in Nuremberg, a mechanical fly made of iron was released from the artificer's hand and seemed to flutter by at the table, eventually returning to its master's hand as if it were tired. Furthermore, an artificial eagle was engineered to fly out of the same town for quite a distance, soaring through the air toward the emperor's arrival and following him to the town gate.* Understood! Please provide the text you would like me to modernize. Thus, you see what mathematical art can achieve when skill, desire, diligence, and ability are applied effectively.

A Digression. And for these, and such like marueilous Actes and Feates, Naturally, Mathematically, and Mechanically, wrought and contriued: Apologeticall. ought any honest Student, and Modest Christian Philosopher, be counted, & called a Coniurer? Shall the folly of Idiotes, and the Mallice of the Scornfull, so much preuaile, that He, who seeketh no worldly gaine or glory at their handes: But onely, of God, the threasor of heauenly wisedome, & knowledge of pure veritie: Shall he (I say) in the meane A.ij space, be robbed and spoiled of his honest name and fame? He that seketh (by S. Paules aduertisement) in the Creatures Properties, and wonderfull vertues, to finde iuste cause, to glorifie the Æternall, and Almightie Creator by: Shall that man, be (in hugger mugger) condemned, as a Companion of the Helhoundes, and a Caller, and Coniurer of wicked and damned Spirites? He that bewaileth his great want of time, sufficient (to his contentation) for learning of Godly wisdome, and Godly Verities in: and onely therin setteth all his delight: Will that mã leese and abuse his time, in dealing with the Chiefe enemie of Christ our Redemer: the deadly foe of all mankinde: the subtile and impudent peruerter of Godly Veritie: the Hypocriticall Crocodile: the Enuious Basiliske, continually desirous, in the twinke of an eye, to destroy all Mankinde, both in Body and Soule, æternally? Surely (for my part, somewhat to say herein) I haue not learned to make so brutish, and so wicked a Bargaine. Should I, for my xx. or xxv. yeares Studie: for two or three thousand Markes spending: seuen or eight thousand Miles going and trauailing, onely for good learninges sake: And that, in all maner of wethers: in all maner of waies and passages: both early and late: in daunger of violence by man: in daunger of destruction by wilde beastes: in hunger: in thirst: in perilous heates by day, with toyle on foote: in daungerous dampes of colde, by night, almost bereuing life: (as God knoweth): with lodginges, oft times, to small ease: and somtime to lesse securitie. And for much more (then all this) done & suffred, for Learning and attaining of Wisedome: Should I (I pray you) for all this, no otherwise, nor more warily: or (by Gods mercifulnes) no more luckily, haue fished, with so large, and costly, a Nette, so long time in drawing (and that with the helpe and aduise of Lady Philosophie, & Queene Theologie): but at length, to haue catched, and drawen vp,* * A prouerb. Fayre fisht, and caught a Frog. a Frog? Nay, a Deuill? For, so, doth the Common peuish Pratler Imagine and Iangle: And, so, doth the Malicious skorner, secretly wishe, & brauely and boldly face down, behinde my backe. Ah, what a miserable thing, is this kinde of Men? How great is the blindnes & boldnes, of the Multitude, in thinges aboue their Capacitie? What a Land: what a People: what Maners: what Times are these? Are they become Deuils, them selues: and, by false witnesse bearing against their Neighbour, would they also, become Murderers? Doth God, so long geue them respite, to reclaime them selues in, from this horrible slaundering of the giltlesse: contrary to their owne Consciences: and yet will they not cease? Doth the Innocent, forbeare the calling of them, Iuridically to aunswere him, according to the rigour of the Lawes: and will they despise his Charitable pacience? As they, against him, by name, do forge, fable, rage, and raise slaunder, by Worde & Print: Will they prouoke him, by worde and Print, likewise, to Note their Names to the World: with their particular deuises, fables, beastly Imaginations, and vnchristen-like slaunders? Well: Well. O (you such) my vnkinde Countrey men. O vnnaturall Countrey men. O vnthankfull Countrey men. O Brainsicke, Rashe, Spitefull, and Disdainfull Countrey men. Why oppresse you me, thus violently, with your slaundering of me: Contrary to Veritie: and contrary to your owne Consciences? And I, to this hower, neither by worde, deede, or thought, haue bene, any way, hurtfull, damageable, or iniurious to you, or yours? Haue I, so long, so dearly, so farre, so carefully, so painfully, so daungerously sought & trauailed for the learning of Wisedome, & atteyning of Vertue: And in the end (in your iudgemẽt) am I become, worse, then when I begã? Worse, thẽ a Mad man? A dangerous Member in the Common Wealth: and no Member of the Church of Christ? Call you this, to be Learned? Call you this, to be a Philosopher? and a louer of Wisedome? To forsake the straight heauenly way: and to wallow in the broad way of || damnation? To forsake the light of heauenly Wisedome: and to lurke in the dungeon of the Prince of darkenesse? To forsake the Veritie of God, & his Creatures: and to fawne vpon the Impudent, Craftie, Obstinate Lier, and continuall disgracer of Gods Veritie, to the vttermost of his power? To forsake the Life & Blisse Æternall: and to cleaue vnto the Author of Death euerlasting? that Murderous Tyrant, most gredily awaiting the Pray of Mans Soule? Well: I thanke God and our Lorde Iesus Christ, for the Comfort which I haue by the Examples of other men, before my time: To whom, neither in godlines of life, nor in perfection of learning, I am worthy to be compared: and yet, they sustained the very like Iniuries, that I do: or rather, greater. Pacient Socrates, his Apologie will testifie: Apuleius his Apologies, will declare the Brutishnesse of the Multitude. Ioannes Picus, Earle of Mirandula, his Apologie will teach you, of the Raging slaunder of the Malicious Ignorant against him. Ioannes Trithemius, his Apologie will specifie, how he had occasion to make publike Protestation: as well by reason of the Rude Simple: as also, in respect of such, as were counted to be of the wisest sort of men. Many could I recite: But I deferre the precise and determined handling of this matter: being loth to detect the Folly & Mallice of my Natiue Countrey men.* Who, so hardly, can disgest or like any extraordinary course of Philosophicall Studies: not falling within the Cumpasse of their Capacitie: or where they are not made priuie of the true and secrete cause, of such wonderfull Philosophicall Feates. These men, are of fower sortes, chiefly. The first, I may name, Vaine pratling busie bodies: The second, Fond Frendes: The third, Imperfectly zelous: and the fourth, Malicious Ignorant. To eche of these (briefly, and in charitie) I will say a word or two, and so returne to my Præface. 1. Vaine pratling busie bodies, vse your idle assemblies, and conferences, otherwise, then in talke of matter, either aboue your Capacities, for hardnesse: or contrary to your Consciences, in Veritie. 2. Fonde Frendes, leaue of, so to commend your vnacquainted frend, vpon blinde affection: As, because he knoweth more, then the common Student: that, therfore, he must needes be skilfull, and a doer, in such matter and maner, as you terme Coniuring. Weening, thereby, you aduaunce his fame: and that you make other men, great marueilers of your hap, to haue such a learned frend. Cease to ascribe Impietie, where you pretend Amitie. For, if your tounges were true, then were that your frend, Vntrue, both to God, and his Soueraigne. Such Frendes and Fondlinges, I shake of, and renounce you: Shake you of, your Folly. 3. Imperfectly zelous, to you, do I say: that (perhaps) well, do you Meane: But farre you misse the Marke: If a Lambe you will kill, to feede the flocke with his bloud. Sheepe, with Lambes bloud, haue no naturall sustenaunce: No more, is Christes flocke, with horrible slaunders, duely ædified. Nor your faire pretense, by such rashe ragged Rhetorike, any whit, well graced. But such, as so vse me, will finde a fowle Cracke in their Credite. Speake that you know: And know, as you ought: Know not, by Heare say, when life lieth in daunger. Search to the quicke, & let Charitie be your guide. 4. Malicious Ignorant, what shall I say to thee? Prohibe linguam tuam a malo. A detractione parcite linguæ. Cause thy toung to refraine frõ euill. Refraine your toung from slaunder. Though your tounges be sharpned, Serpent like, & Adders poyson lye in your lippes: Psal. 140. yet take heede, and thinke, betimes, with your selfe, Vir linguosus non stabilietur in terra. Virum violentum venabitur malum, donec præcipitetur. For, sure I am, Quia faciet Dominus Iudicium afflicti: & vindictam pauperum.

A Side Note. For these and similar amazing acts and feats, created through natural, mathematical, and mechanical means: Sorry. should any honest student and modest Christian philosopher be labeled or called a Magician? Will the foolishness of idiots and the malice of the scornful prevail so much that the person seeking no worldly gain or glory from them, but only from God, the source of heavenly wisdom and knowledge of pure truth, be robbed of his honest reputation? The one who seeks, following Saint Paul's guidance, in the properties and wonderful attributes of creation, to find just cause to glorify the Eternal and Almighty Creator: shall that person be condemned, in secret, as a companion of hellhounds, and a summoner and conjurer of wicked and damned spirits? The person who laments his great lack of time, sufficiently ample for learning divine wisdom and truths, and finds ultimate delight therein—will he waste and misuse his time engaging with the chief enemy of Christ our Redeemer, the deadly foe of all humankind, the subtle and shameless perverter of divine truth, the hypocritical crocodile, the envious basilisk, continually eager to destroy all of humankind, both in body and soul, eternally? Surely (for my part, to say something here) I have not learned to make such a brutish and wicked deal. Should I, for my twenty or twenty-five years of study; for spending two or three thousand marks; traveling seven or eight thousand miles solely for the sake of good learning; enduring all manners of weather, through all kinds of roads and paths; early and late; at risk of violence from men; in danger of destruction from wild beasts; in hunger; in thirst; perilous heat by day, with toil on foot; in dangerous cold, almost robbing me of life at night (as God knows); with lodging often of little comfort and sometimes even less security; and for much more than all this, done and suffered in pursuit of knowledge and wisdom—should I (I ask you) for all of this, not more carefully, nor (by God's mercy) more fortunately, have fished with such a large and costly net, for so long, with the help and advice of Lady Philosophy and Queen Theology, only to have finally caught and drawn up,* A saying: Fair caught fish and snagged a frog. a frog? No, a devil? For that is what the common foolish gossip imagine and chatter; and so does the malicious scorner secretly wish, and boldly face down behind my back. Ah, what a miserable state these kinds of men are in! How great is the blindness and boldness of the multitude in matters beyond their grasp! What a land, what a people, what manners, what times are these? Have they become devils themselves, and, by bearing false witness against their neighbor, would they also become murderers? Does God, for so long, grant them respite to reclaim themselves from this dreadful slandering of the innocent, contrary to their own consciences, and yet they will not cease? Does the innocent forbear from calling them, legally, to answer according to the rigor of the laws, while they despise his charitable patience? As they, against him, by name, concoct, fabricate, rage, and raise slander by word and print: will they provoke him, by word and print again, to expose their names to the world, with their particular schemes, fables, beastly imaginations, and unchristian-like slanders? Well, well. O (you such) my unkind countrymen. O unnatural countrymen. O ungrateful countrymen. O foolish, rash, spiteful, and disdainful countrymen. Why do you oppress me so violently with your slander, contrary to truth and against your own consciences? And I, to this hour, have not been in any way harmful, damaging, or injurious to you or yours by word, deed, or thought. Have I, for so long, so dearly, so far, so carefully, so painfully, so dangerously sought and traveled for the learning of wisdom, and the attainment of virtue: and in the end (in your judgment) have I become worse than when I began? Worse than a madman? A dangerous member of the commonwealth, yet no member of the church of Christ? Is this what you call being learned? Is this what you call being a philosopher and a lover of wisdom? To forsake the straight heavenly path and wallow in the broad way of damnation? To abandon the light of heavenly wisdom and lurk in the dungeon of the prince of darkness? To forsake the truth of God and his creations, and to fawn upon the impudent, crafty, obstinate liar, and continual disgrace of God's truth, to the very limit of his power? To forsake eternal life and bliss and cling to the author of everlasting death? That murderous tyrant, eagerly awaiting the prey of man's soul? Well, I thank God and our Lord Jesus Christ for the comfort I gain from the examples of other men before my time: to whom, neither in godliness of life nor in perfection of learning, am I worthy to be compared; and yet, they suffered the very same injuries that I do, or rather, even greater ones. Patient Socrates, his Apologie will testify: Apuleius's Apologies will reveal the brutality of the multitude. Ioannes Picus, Count of Mirandula, his Apologie will teach you about the raging slander of the ignorant malicious against him. Ioannes Trithemius, his Apologie will specify how he had reason to make a public protest, both due to the rude simple-minded and also in regard to others considered to be among the wisest. "Many could I recite: But I refrain from the precise and complete handling of this matter, being reluctant to expose the folly and malice of my native countrymen.* Sure! Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize. Who, can hardly digest or appreciate any extraordinary course of philosophical study not contained within the scope of their understanding, or where they are not informed of the true and secret cause of such wonderful philosophical feats.It seems there was an issue with your request as there's no text following the quotation mark. Please provide the short piece of text you would like me to modernize. These men can be divided into four categories. The first, I may label, Vain Prattle Busy Bodies: The second, Foolish Friends: The third, Imperfectly Zealous: and the fourth, Malicious Ignorant. To each of these (briefly and charitably) I will say a word or two before returning to my preface. Please provide the text you'd like me to modernize. Vain Prattle Busy Bodies, conduct your idle gatherings and discussions differently, than by talking about matters either beyond your understanding or contrary to your consciences, in truth. 2. Foolish Friends, stop praising your unfamiliar friend out of blind affection: just because he knows more than the average student does not mean he must be skilled and active in matters you term Conjuring. Thinking this way, you enhance his reputation and make others marvel at your fortune in having such a learned friend. Cease to assign impiety where you claim friendship. For if your tongues were true, then your friend would be untrue, both to God and his Sovereign. Such Friends and Foolish Ones, I rebuke and renounce you: shake off your folly. 3. Imperfectly Zealous, to you I say: you may mean well, but you miss the mark: if you kill a lamb to feed the flock with its blood. Sheep cannot sustain themselves with lambs' blood: nor can Christ's flock be well-fed on horrible slanders. Nor can your fine pretense by such rash and ragged rhetoric be justified. But those who treat me this way will find a serious crack in their credibility. Speak what you know: and know as you ought: do not know by hearsay when life is at stake. Seek to the core, and let charity be your guide. 4. Malicious Ignorant, what shall I say to you? Prohibe linguam tuam a malo. A detractione parcite linguæ. Keep your tongue from doing evil. Avoid speaking slander. Even if your tongues are sharpened, like a serpent, and the poison of adders lies on your lips: Psalms 140. yet take heed, and think, early, with yourself, Vir linguosus non stabilietur in terra. Virum violentum venabitur malum, donec præcipitetur. For, surely I believe, Quia faciet Dominus Iudicium afflicti: & vindictam pauperum.

Thus, I require you, my assured frendes, and Countrey men (you Mathematiciens, Mechaniciens, and Philosophers, Charitable and discrete) to deale in my A.iij behalf, with the light & vntrue tounged, my enuious Aduersaries, or Fond frends. And farther, I would wishe, that at leysor, you would consider, how Basilius Magnus, layeth Moses and Daniel, before the eyes of those, which count all such Studies Philosophicall (as mine hath bene) to be vngodly, or vnprofitable. Waye well S. Stephen his witnesse of Moses. Act. 7. C. Eruditus est Moses omni Sapientia Ægyptiorũ: & erat potens in verbis & operibus suis. Moses was instructed in all maner of wisedome of the Ægyptians: and he was of power both in his wordes, and workes. You see this Philosophicall Power & Wisedome, which Moses had, to be nothing misliked of the Holy Ghost. Yet Plinius hath recorded, Moses to be a wicked Magicien. And that (of force) must be, either for this Philosophicall wisedome, learned, before his calling to the leading of the Children of Israel: or for those his wonders, wrought before King Pharao, after he had the conducting of the Israelites. As concerning the first, you perceaue, how S. Stephen, at his Martyrdome (being full of the Holy Ghost) in his Recapitulation of the olde Testament, hath made mention of Moses Philosophie: with good liking of it: And Basilius Magnus also, auoucheth it, to haue bene to Moses profitable (and therefore, I say, to the Church of God, necessary). But as cõcerning Moses wonders, done before King Pharao: God, him selfe, sayd: Vide vt omnia ostenta, quæ posui in manu tua, facias coram Pharaone. See that thou do all those wonders before Pharao, which I haue put in thy hand. Thus, you euidently perceaue, how rashly, Plinius hath slaundered Moses, Lib. 30. Cap. 1. of vayne fraudulent Magike, saying: Est & alia Magices Factio, a Mose, Iamne, & Iotape, Iudæis pendens: sed multis millibus annorum post Zoroastrem. &c. 1. Let all such, therefore, who, in Iudgement and Skill of Philosophie, are farre Inferior to Plinie, take good heede, least they ouershoote them selues rashly, in   Iudging of Philosophers straunge Actes: and the Meanes, how they are done. 2. But, much more, ought they to beware of forging, deuising, and imagining monstrous feates, and wonderfull workes, when and where, no such were done: no, not any sparke or likelihode, of such, as they, without all shame, do report. 3. And (to conclude) most of all, let them be ashamed of Man, and afraide of the dreadfull and Iuste Iudge: both Folishly or Maliciously to deuise: and then, deuilishly to father their new fond Monsters on me: Innocent, in hand and hart: for trespacing either against the lawe of God, or Man, in any my Studies or Exercises, Philosophicall, or Mathematicall: As in due time, I hope, will be more manifest.

I ask you, my trusted friends and fellow countrymen (you mathematicians, mechanics, and philosophers, kind and wise), to stand up for me against the misleading and deceitful tongues of my envious adversaries and naïve friends. Furthermore, I wish that in your free time, you would consider how Basilius Magnus presents Moses and Daniel to those who dismiss all such studies as unholy or unbeneficial. Think carefully about S. Stephen’s testimony regarding Moses. Act 7 C. Moses was educated in all the wisdom of the Egyptians; he was powerful in both his words and deeds. You see that this philosophical power and wisdom which Moses possessed was not condemned by the Holy Spirit. Yet Plinius recorded Moses as a wicked magician. This must either concern his philosophical wisdom learned before he was called to lead the Children of Israel, or the miracles he performed before King Pharaoh after he took on the leadership of the Israelites. Regarding the first, you see how S. Stephen, during his martyrdom (being filled with the Holy Spirit) in his summary of the Old Testament, spoke favorably of Moses’s philosophy. Basilius Magnus also asserts that it was beneficial to Moses (and therefore I say, necessary for the Church of God). As for the miracles Moses performed before King Pharaoh: God Himself said: Make sure you perform all the wonders I have put in your hands before Pharaoh. Thus, you can clearly see how rashly Plinius slandered Moses, Lib. 30. Ch. 1. claiming there is another form of magic associated with Moses, Janne, and Iotape, hanging in the balance of the Jews, but many thousands of years after Zoroaster, etc. 1. Let all those, therefore, who are far less knowledgeable and skilled in philosophy than Plinius, take care not to overstep themselves rashly, in judging of philosophers' strange acts: and the means by which they are accomplished. 2. Moreover, they should be even more cautious about inventing, devising, and imagining monstrous feats and wonderful works where none were done: no, not even a hint or possibility of such, as they shamefully report. 3. And (to conclude) most importantly, let them be ashamed of man and afraid of the dreadful and just Judge: both foolishly or maliciously to devise and then wickedly to attribute their new fanciful monsters to me: innocent in heart and hand: for transgressing neither the law of God nor man in any of my studies or exercises, philosophical or mathematical: as I hope will become clearer in due time.

NOw end I, with Archemastrie. Which name, is not so new, as this Arte is rare. For an other Arte, vnder this, a degree (for skill and power) hath bene indued with this English name before. And yet, this, may serue for our purpose, sufficiently, at this present. This Arte, teacheth to bryng to actuall experience sensible, all worthy conclusions by all the Artes Mathematicall purposed, & by true Naturall Philosophie concluded: & both addeth to them a farder scope, in the termes of the same Artes, & also by hys propre Method, and in peculier termes, procedeth, with helpe of the foresayd Artes, to the performance of complet Experiẽces, which of no particular Art, are hable (Formally) to be challenged. If you remember, how we considered Architecture, in respect of all common handworkes: some light may you haue, therby, to vnderstand the Souerainty and propertie of this Science. Science I may call it, rather, then an Arte: for the excellency and Mastershyp it hath, ouer so many, and so mighty Artes and || Sciences. And bycause it procedeth by Experiences, and searcheth forth the causes of Conclusions, by Experiences: and also putteth the Conclusions them selues, in Experience, it is named of some, Scientia Experimentalis. The Experimentall Science. Nicolaus Cusanus termeth it so, in hys Experimentes Statikall, And an other Philosopher, R. B. of this land Natiue (the floure of whose worthy fame, can neuer dye nor wither) did write therof largely, at the request of Clement the sixt. The Arte carrieth with it, a wonderfull Credit: By reason, it certefieth, sensibly, fully, and completely to the vtmost power of Nature, and Arte. This Arte, certifieth by Experience complete and absolute: and other Artes, with their Argumentes, and Demonstrations, persuade: and in wordes, proue very well their Conclusions.* But   wordes, and Argumentes, are no sensible certifying: nor the full and finall frute of Sciences practisable. And though some Artes, haue in them, Experiences, yet they are not complete, and brought to the vttermost, they may be stretched vnto, and applyed sensibly. As for example: the Naturall Philosopher disputeth and maketh goodly shew of reason: And the Astronomer, and the Opticall Mechanicien, put some thynges in Experience: but neither, all, that they may: nor yet sufficiently, and to the vtmost, those, which they do, There, then, the Archemaster steppeth in, and leadeth forth on, the Experiences, by order of his doctrine Experimentall, to the chief and finall power of Naturall and Mathematicall Artes. Of two or three men, in whom, this Description of Archemastry was Experimentally, verified, I haue read and hard: and good record, is of their such perfection. So that, this Art, is no fantasticall Imagination: as some Sophister, might, Cum suis Insolubilibus, make a florish: and dassell your Imagination: and dash your honest desire and Courage, from beleuing these thinges, so vnheard of, so meruaylous, & of such Importance. Well: as you will. I haue forewarned you. I haue done the part of a frende: I haue discharged my Duety toward God: for my small Talent, at hys most mercyfull handes receiued. To this Science, doth the Science Alnirangiat, great Seruice. Muse nothyng of this name. I chaunge not the name, so vsed, and in Print published by other: beyng a name, propre to the Science. Vnder this, commeth Ars Sintrillia, by Artephius, briefly written. But the chief Science, of the Archemaster, (in this world) as yet knowen, is an other (as it were) OPTICAL Science: wherof, the name shall be told (God willyng) when I shall haue some, (more iust) occasion, therof, to Discourse.

Now I present to you Archery. This name isn’t new, but this art is quite rare. Another art, under this one, with a degree of skill and power has already been given this English name before. Yet, this one will suffice for our purposes right now. This art teaches how to bring to life, through experience, all valuable conclusions suggested by various mathematical fields and confirmed by genuine natural philosophy. It also broadens their application using the language of those fields and, through its own methods and unique terminology, works with the help of the mentioned fields to conduct thorough experiments that no single discipline can fully claim. If you remember how we considered Architecture in relation to all common crafts, you may gain some insight into the superiority and uniqueness of this science. I would rather call it a Science than an art, due to its excellence and mastery over so many strong arts and sciences. It derives from Experiences, seeks out the causes of conclusions through Experiences, and also puts the conclusions themselves to the test in Experience; it’s referred to by some as Scientia Experimentalis. The Experimental Science. Nicolaus Cusanus calls it this in his Experimentes Statikall. Another Philosopher, R. B. a native of this land (whose remarkable fame can never fade or wither) wrote extensively about it at the request of Clement the sixth. This art carries with it a marvelous credibility: because it certifies sensibly, fully, and completely to the utmost power of Nature and Art. This art certifies complete and absolute through Experience, while other arts, with their arguments and demonstrations, persuade and verbally prove their conclusions very well.* However, words and arguments do not provide a sensible certification nor the complete and final fruit of applicable sciences. Although some arts include Experiences, they are not comprehensive and brought to their fullest potential in a sensible application. For example: the natural philosopher argues and presents a strong case of reasoning; the astronomer and optical mechanic put some things to Experience: but they do neither fully nor sufficiently what they can do. Here, the Archemaster comes in, leading forward the Experiences according to his Experimental doctrine, to the ultimate and final power of natural and mathematical arts. I have read and heard of two or three men in whom this description of Archemastry was Experimentally verified, and there is good record of their high level of perfection. Therefore, this art is not a fanciful imagination: as some sophists might, Cum suis Insolubilibus, make flashy claims that dazzle your imagination and deter your honest desire and courage from believing these unheard-of, marvelous, and significant things. Well, it’s up to you. I have warned you. I have done my part as a friend: I have fulfilled my duty toward God for my small talent received at His most merciful hands. The Science Alnirangiat plays a significant role in this science. Don’t worry about the name. I won’t change the name, as it is already used and published by others; it is a name proper to the science. Under this, comes Ars Sintrillia, briefly written by Artephius. But the main science of the Archemaster, (currently known in this world), is another one (as it were) OPTICAL Science: the name of which I will share (God willing) when I have a more appropriate occasion to discuss it.

Here, I must end, thus abruptly (Gentle frende, and vnfayned louer of honest and necessary verities.) For, they, who haue (for your sake, and vertues cause) requested me, (an old forworne Mathematicien) to take pen in hand: (through the confidence they reposed in my long experience: and tryed sincerity) for the declaryng and reportyng somewhat, of the frute and commodity, by the Artes Mathematicall, to be atteyned vnto: euen they, Sore agaynst their willes, are forced, for sundry causes, to satisfie the workemans request, in endyng forthwith: He, so feareth this, so new an attempt, & so costly: And in matter so slenderly (hetherto) among the common Sorte of Studentes, considered or estemed.

I must wrap this up abruptly (Dear friend, and genuine lover of honest and essential truths.) Those who have asked me (for your benefit and the sake of virtue) to write this down (based on their trust in my long experience and proven honesty) to share a bit about the results and benefits we can gain from the Math Arts: they, very reluctantly, are compelled for various reasons to meet the request of the worker, finishing up right away: He fears this new challenge so much, and it’s so expensive: And the topic has been so lightly regarded (until now) among the general group of students.

And where I was willed, somewhat to alledge, why, in our vulgare Speche, this part of the Principall Science of Geometrie, called Euclides Geometricall Elementes, is published, to your handlyng: being vnlatined people, and not Vniuersitie Scholers: Verily, I thinke it nedelesse.

And where I was asked to explain why this part of the main science of Geometry, called Euclid's Geometrical Elements, is presented to you, who are not Latin speakers or university scholars: Honestly, I think it's unnecessary.

1. For, the Honour, and Estimation of the Vniuersities, and Graduates, is, hereby, nothing diminished. Seing, from, and by their Nurse Children, you receaue all this Benefite: how great soeuer it be.

1. Because the honor and respect of the Colleges and Graduates are in no way lessened by this. You receive all these benefits from their nurtured students, no matter how great they may be.

A.iiij

2. Neither are their Studies, hereby, any whit hindred. No more, then the Italian Vniuersities, as Academia Bononiensis, Ferrariensis, Florentina, Mediolanensis, Patauina, Papiensis, Perusina, Pisana, Romana, Senensis, or any one of them, finde them selues, any deale, disgraced, or their Studies any thing hindred, by Frater Lucas de Burgo, or by Nicolaus Tartalea, who in vulgar Italian language, haue published, not onely Euclides Geometrie, but of Archimedes somewhat: and in Arithmetike and Practicall Geometrie, very large volumes, all in their vulgar speche. Nor in Germany haue the famous Vniuersities, any thing bene discontent with Albertus Durerus, his Geometricall Institutions in Dutch: or with Gulielmus Xylander, his learned translation of the first sixe bookes of Euclide, out of the Greke into the high Dutch. Nor with Gualterus H. Riffius, his Geometricall Volume: very diligently translated into the high Dutch tounge, and published. Nor yet the Vniuersities of Spaine, or Portugall, thinke their reputation to be decayed: or suppose any their Studies to be hindred by the Excellent P. Nonnius, his Mathematicall workes, in vulgare speche by him put forth. Haue you not, likewise, in the French tounge, the whole Mathematicall Quadriuie? and yet neither Paris, Orleance, or any of the other Vniuersities of Fraunce, at any time, with the Translaters, or Publishers offended: or any mans Studie thereby hindred?

2. Their studies are not hindered at all. Just like the Italian universities, such as Bologna, Ferrara, Florence, Milan, Padua, Pavia, Perugia, Pisa, Rome, Siena, or any of them, don’t feel any disgrace or hindrance in their studies because of Brother Lucas de Burgo or Nicolaus Tartalea, who have published not only Euclid's Geometry but also some of Archimedes’ work in everyday Italian. Similarly, the renowned German universities are not at all displeased with Albert Dürer's Geometric Institutions in Dutch, or with Gulielmus Xylander's learned translation of the first six books of Euclid from Greek into High Dutch. Nor are the universities in Spain or Portugal concerned about their reputation being diminished or their studies being hindered by the excellent P. Nonnius's mathematical works published in the vernacular. Don't you also have the complete Mathematical Quadrivium in French? Yet neither Paris, Orléans, nor any other universities in France have ever been offended by the translators or publishers, nor has anyone's study been hindered by it.

3. And surely, the Common and Vulgar Scholer (much more, the Gramarian) before his comming to the Vniuersitie, shall (or may) be, now (according to Plato his Counsell) sufficiently instructed in Arithmetike and Geometrie, for the better and easier learning of all maner of Philosophie, Academicall, or Peripateticall. And by that meanes, goe more cherefully, more skilfully, and spedily forwarde, in his Studies, there to be learned. And, so, in lesse time, profite more, then (otherwise) he should, or could do.

3. Certainly, both the average student and especially the grammarian, before arriving at the University, can be, as Plato advised, adequately taught in Arithmetic and Geometry, which will make it easier to learn all kinds of Philosophy, whether Academic or Peripatetic. This way, they can progress more happily, skillfully, and quickly in their studies, gaining more in less time than they otherwise could.

4. Also many good and pregnant Englishe wittes, of young Gentlemen, and of other, who neuer intend to meddle with the profound search and Studie of Philosophie (in the Vniuersities to be learned) may neuerthelesse, now, with more ease and libertie, haue good occasion, vertuously to occupie the sharpnesse of their wittes: where, els (perchance) otherwise, they would in fond exercises, spend (or rather leese) their time: neither seruing God: nor furdering the Weale, common or priuate.

4. Many smart and talented young men, along with others who never plan to delve into deep philosophical study at the Universities, can now more easily and freely find good ways to sharpen their minds. Otherwise, they might waste their time on silly activities, which neither serve God nor contribute to the common good or personal welfare.

5. And great Comfort, with good hope, may the Vniuersities haue, by reason of this Englishe Geometrie, and Mathematicall Præface, that they (hereafter) shall be the more regarded, esteemed, and resorted vnto. For, when it shall be knowen and reported, that of the Mathematicall Sciences onely, such great Commodities are ensuing (as I haue specified): and that in dede, some of you vnlatined Studentes, can be good witnesse, of such rare fruite by you enioyed (thereby): as either, before this, was not heard of: or els, not so fully credited: Well, may all men coniecture, that farre greater ayde, and better furniture, to winne to the Perfection of all Philosophie, Vniuersities. may in the Vniuersities be had: being the Storehouses & Threasory of all Sciences,   and all Artes, necessary for the best, and most noble State of Common Wealthes.

5. And great comfort, along with good hope, may the Universities have because of this English Geometry and Math Introduction, which will likely lead to them being more valued, esteemed, and visited in the future. For, when it becomes known and reported that such significant benefits arise solely from the Mathematical Sciences (as I have mentioned): and that indeed, some of you un-Latinized students can testify to the rare rewards you’ve enjoyed (because of it): which were either unheard of before or not fully acknowledged: Well, anyone can guess that far greater support and better resources for achieving the perfection of all philosophy, Colleges. can be found in the Universities: being the storehouses and treasury of all sciences, and all arts necessary for the best and most noble state of common wealths.

6. Besides this, how many a Common Artificer, is there, in these Realmes of England and Ireland, that dealeth with Numbers, Rule, & Cumpasse: Who, with their owne Skill and experience, already had, will be hable (by these good helpes and informations) to finde out, and deuise, new workes, straunge Engines, and Instrumentes: for sundry purposes in the Common Wealth? or for priuate pleasure? and for the better maintayning of their owne estate? I will not (therefore) || fight against myne owne shadowe. For, no man (I am sure) will open his mouth against this Enterprise. No mã (I say) who either hath Charitie toward his brother (and would be glad of his furtherance in vertuous knowledge): or that hath any care & zeale for the bettering of the Cõmon state of this Realme. Neither any, that make accompt, what the wiser sort of men (Sage and Stayed) do thinke of them. To none (therefore) will I make any Apologie, for a vertuous acte doing: and for cõmending, or setting forth, Profitable Artes to English men, in the English toung. But, vnto God our Creator, let vs all be thankefull: for that, As he, of his Goodnes, by his Powre, and in his wisedome,   hath Created all thynges, in Number, Waight, and Measure: So, to vs, of hys great Mercy, he hath reuealed Meanes, whereby, to atteyne the sufficient and necessary knowledge of the foresayd hys three principall Instrumentes: Which Meanes, I haue abundantly proued vnto you, to be the Sciences and Artes Mathematicall.

6. Aside from this, how many common craftsmen are there in England and Ireland who work with numbers, rules, and compasses? With their own skills and experience, they will be able (with these helpful resources and information) to discover and create new works, strange devices, and tools for various purposes in the common good or for personal enjoyment, and to better sustain their own livelihood. I will not, therefore, || fight against my own shadow. For I am sure no one will speak out against this endeavor. No one, I say, who either has charity for their neighbor (and would be glad to help him in gaining virtuous knowledge) or who cares for the improvement of the common state of this realm. Nor will it matter to anyone what the wise individuals (sage and composed) think of them. Therefore, I will not make any apology for engaging in a virtuous act: commending or promoting practical arts to English people, in the English language. But, let us all be grateful to God our Creator: for that, as He, in His goodness, has created everything through His power and wisdom, with precise number, weight, and measure: so, in His great mercy, He has revealed ways for us to acquire the sufficient and necessary knowledge of these three principal instruments: which means I have abundantly shown you to be the sciences and mathematical arts.

And though I haue ben pinched with straightnes of tyme: that, no way, I could so pen downe the matter (in my Mynde) as I determined: hopyng of conuenient laysure: Yet. if vertuous zeale, and honest Intent prouoke and bryng you to the readyng and examinyng of this Compendious treatise, I do not doute, but, as the veritie therof (accordyng to our purpose) will be euident vnto you: So the pith and force therof, will persuade you: and the wonderfull frute therof, highly pleasure you. And that you may the easier perceiue, and better remember, the principall pointes, whereof my Preface treateth, The Ground platt of this Præface in a Table. I will giue you the Groundplatt of my whole discourse, in a Table annexed: from the first to the last, somewhat Methodically contriued.

And even though I've been pressed for time, to the point where I couldn't write down my thoughts as I intended, hoping for some free time, I believe that if your virtuous enthusiasm and honest intention drive you to read and examine this brief treatise, I have no doubt that the truth of it (as it relates to our purpose) will become clear to you. The essence and strength of it will convince you, and its remarkable results will bring you great pleasure. To help you understand and remember the main points that my Preface addresses, The outline of this Preface in a table. I will provide you with the Floor plan of my entire discussion in a table attached, organized from start to finish in a somewhat methodical way.

If Hast, hath caused my poore pen, any where, to stumble: You will, (I am
sure) in part of recompence, (for my earnest and sincere good will to pleasure
you), Consider the rockish huge mountaines, and the perilous
vnbeaten wayes, which (both night and day, for the while) it
hath toyled and labored through, to bryng you this good
Newes, and Comfortable profe, of Vertues frute.

If haste has caused my humble pen to stumble anywhere, you will, (I’m
sure) in part as a reward for my earnest and genuine desire to
please you, consider the huge rocky mountains and the perilous
untrodden paths that it has toiled and labored through, both night and day, to
bring you this good news and comforting proof of virtue's fruits.

So, I Commit you vnto Gods Mercyfull direction, for the rest: hartely
besechyng hym, to prosper your Studyes, and honest Intentes:
to his Glory, & the Commodity of our Countrey. Amen.

So, I commit you to God's merciful guidance for the rest: wholeheartedly
asking Him to bless your studies and good intentions:
for His glory and the benefit of our country. Amen.

Written at my poore House
At Mortlake.

Written at my small house
In Mortlake.

Anno. 1570. February. 9.

Feb 9, 1570.


J. DEE

J. DEE

Here haue you (according to my promisse) the Groundplat of

Here you have (as I promised) the layout of

my MATHEMATICALL Præface: annexed to Euclide (now first)

my MATHEMATICALLY Preface: attached to Euclid (now first)

published in our Englishe tounge. An. 1570. Febr. 3.

published in our English tongue. An. 1570. Feb. 3.

     

Simple, Which dealeth with Numbers onely: and demon­strateth all their properties and apper­tenances: where, an Vnit, is Indiui­sible.

Easy, This only addresses numbers and displays all their properties and characteristics: where a unit is indivisible.

   

In thinges Super­naturall, æternall, & Diuine: By Appli­cation, Ascending.

In supernatural, eternal, and divine things: By application, ascending.

 

Arithmetike.

Arithmetic.

Mixt, Which with aide of Geometrie principall, demon­strateth some Arith­meticall Conclusion, or Purpose.

Mixtape, Which, with the help of basic Geometry, shows some Arithmetic Conclusion or Objective.

 

The vse
whereof, is either,

The vse
which is either,

The like Vses and Appli­cations are, (though in a degree lower) in the Artes Mathe­maticall Deriuatiue.

The same goes for Vses and Applications, (though to a lesser degree) in the Mathematical Arts Derivative.

Principall, which are two, onely,

Principals, which are two, only,

 
 


In thinges Mathe­maticall: without farther Appli­cation.

In mathematical matters: without further application.

Sciences, and Artes Mathe­maticall, are, either

Sciences and Arts, Mathematical, are either

 
 


Simple, Which dealeth with Magni­tudes, onely: and demon­strateth all their properties, passions, and apper­tenances: whose Point, is Indiui­sible.

Simple, This deals only with magnitudes and shows all their properties, characteristics, and relationships; a point which cannot be divided.

 
 


Geometrie.

Geometry.

In thinges Naturall: both Substã­tiall, & Accidentall, Visible, & Inuisible. &c. By Appli­cation: Descending.

In natural things: both substantial and accidental, visible and invisible, etc. By application: Descending.

   

Mixt, Which with aide of Arith­metike principall, demon­strateth some Geometricall purpose, as EVCLIDES ELEMENTES.

Blend, Which, with the help of basic arithmetic, shows some geometric purpose, as EUCLID'S ELEMENTS.

     
   

Arith­metike, vulgar: which consi­dereth

Arithmetic, basic: which considers

Arith­metike of most vsuall whole numbers: And of Fractions to them apper­taining.

Arithmetic of the most commonly used whole numbers: And of fractions related to them.

Arith­metike of Propor­tions.

Arithmetic of Proportions.

Arith­metike Circular.

Circular Math.

Arith­metike of Radicall Nũbers: Simple, Compound, Mixt: And of their Fractions.

Arithmetics of Radical Numbers: Simple, Compound, Mixed: And of their Fractions.

Arith­metike of Cossike Nũbers: with their Fractions: And the great Arte of Algiebar.

Arithmetics of Cosmic Numbers: along with their Fractions: And the great Art of Algebra.

The names of the Princi­palls: as,

The names of the Principals:

 

At hand

At hand

All Lengthes.—

All Lengths.—

All Plaines: As, Land, Borde, Glasse, &c.

All Plains: Like, Land, Border, Glass, etc.

All Solids: As, Timber, Stone, Vessels, &c.

All Solids: Like, Wood, Stone, Containers, etc.

Mecometrie.

Measuring.

Embadometrie.

Embadometry.

Stereometrie.

Stereometry.

Deriuatiue frõ the Princi­palls: of which, some haue

Derivatives from the Principals: of which, some have

 

Geometrie, vulgar: which teacheth Measuring

Geometry, which teaches measurement

 

How farre, from the Measurer, any thing is: of him sene, on Land or Water: called Apomecometrie.

How far away?, From the Measurer, anything that can be seen, whether on land or water, is called Apomecometry.

   

Geodesie: more cunningly to Measure and Suruey Landes, Woods, Waters. &c.

Geospatial science: more intelligently assess and map land, forests, water, etc.

     

With distãce from the thing Measured, as,

From a distance from the measured thing, as,

How high or deepe, from the leuell of the Measurers standing, any thing is: Seene of hym, on Land or Water: called Hypso­metrie.

How high or low, From the perspective of the standing measurers, everything is: Observed Hypsometry.

 

Of which are growen the Feates & Artes of

From where come the feats & arts of

Geographie.

Geography.

 

Choro­graphie.

Choreography.

 

Hydro­graphie.

Hydrography.

   

How broad, a thing is, which is in the Measurers view: so it be situated on Land or Water: called Plato­metrie.

How wide, Something is, from the Measurer's perspective: whether it’s situated on land or water: referred to as Plato Metrics.

   

Strat­arith­metrie.

Strat-arithmetrie.

   

 
 


Perspectiue,

Perspective,

Which demon­strateth the maners and properties of all Radia­tions: Directe, Broken, and Reflected.

Which shows the manners and characteristics of all radiations: Direct, Broken, and Reflected.

 

Astro­nomie,

Astronomy,

Which demon­strateth the Distances, Magni­tudes, and all Naturall motions, Apparences, and Passions, proper to the Planets and fixed Starres: for any time, past, present, and to come: in respecte of a certaine Horizon, or without respecte of any Horizon.

Which shows the distances, sizes, and all natural movements, appearances, and characteristics that belong to the planets and fixed stars: for any time—past, present, and future—in relation to a specific horizon, or regardless of any horizon.

Musike,

Music,

Which demon­strateth by reason, and teacheth by sense, perfectly to iudge and order the diuer­sitie of Soundes, hie or low.

Which demonstrates through reasoning and teaches through experience, perfectly to judge and arrange the variety of sounds, high or low.

Cosmo­graphie,

Cosmography,

Which, wholy and perfectly maketh description of the Heauenlym and also Elementall part of the World: and of these partes, maketh homologall appli­cation, and mutuall collation necessary.

Which completely and perfectly describes both the heavenly and elemental parts of the world; and from these parts, it makes necessary comparisons and mutual correlations.

Astro­logie,

Astrology,

Which reasonably demon­strateth the opera­tions and effectes of the naturall beames of light, and secrete Influence of the Planets, and fixed Starres, in euery Element and Elementall body: at all times, in any Horizon assigned.

This reasonably demonstrates the operations and effects of natural beams of light, and the secret influence of the planets and fixed stars, in every element and elemental body: at all times, in any assigned horizon.

Statike,

Static,

Which demon­strateth the causes of heauines and lightnes of all thinges: and of the motions and properties to heauines and lightnes belonging.

Which shows the reasons for the heaviness and lightness of everything: and the movements and qualities related to heaviness and lightness.

Anthropographie,

Demography,

Which describeth the Nũber, Measure, Waight, Figure, Situation, and colour of euery diuers thing contained in the perfecte body of MAN: and geueth certaine knowledge of the Figure, Symmetrie, Waight, Charac­terization, & due Locall motion of any percell of the said body assigned: and of numbers to the said percell apper­taining.

Which describes the number, size, weight, shape, position, and color of every different thing found in the perfect body of MAN: and provides certain knowledge of the shape, symmetry, weight, characteristics, and proper local motion of any part of the said body assigned: and of numbers related to the said part.

Propre names
as,

Proper names
as,

Trochilike,

Hummingbird-like,

Which demon­strateth the properties of all Circular motions: Simple and Compound.

Which shows the characteristics of all circular movements: simple and complex.

 

Helico­sophie,

Helicosophy

Which demon­strateth the designing of all Spirall lines: in Plaine, on Cylinder, Cone, Sphære, Conoïd, and Sphæroid: and their properties.

Which demonstrates the design of all spiral lines: in flat surfaces, on cylinders, cones, spheres, conoids, and spheroids: and their properties.

Pneuma­tithmie,

Pneumatics

Which demon­strateth by close hollow Geometricall figures (Regular and Irregular) the straunge properties (in motion or stay) of the Water, Ayre, Smoke, and Fire, in their Conti­nuitie, and as they are ioyned to the Elementes next them.

Which demonstrates through detailed hollow geometric shapes (both regular and irregular) the strange properties (when in motion or still) of water, air, smoke, and fire, in their continuity, and how they are connected to the elements around them.

   

Menadrie,

Menagerie,

Which demon­strateth, how, aboue Natures Vertue, and power simple: Vertue and force, may be multi­plied: and so to directe, to lift, to pull to, and to put or cast fro, any multi­plied, or simple deter­mined Vertue, Waight, or Force: naturally, not, so, direc­tible, or moueable.

Which shows how, beyond Nature's strength, both power and ability can be multiplied; and thus we can direct, lift, pull, or throw any multiplied or simply determined ability, weight, or force: naturally, these cannot be directed or moved in that way.

Hypogeiodie,

Hypogeoid

Which demon­strateth, how, vnder the Sphæricall Super­ficies of the Earth, at any depth, to any perpen­dicular line assigned (whose distance from the perpen­dicular of the entrance: and the Azimuth likewise, in respecte of the sayd entrance, is knowen) certaine way, may be prescribed and gone, &c.

This shows how, under the spherical surface of the Earth, at any depth, a specific path can be determined and followed to any assigned vertical line (where the distance from the vertical entry point and the azimuth in relation to that entry point is known), etc.

Hydra­gogie,

Hydrotherapy,

Which demon­strateth the possible leading of water by Natures law, and by artificiall helpe, from any head (being Spring, standing, or running water) to any other place assigned.

This shows how water can be moved according to nature's laws and with human assistance, from any source (whether it's a spring, still water, or flowing water) to any other designated location.

Horometrie,

Horometry,

Which demon­strateth, how, at all times appointed, the precise, vsuall denomi­nation of time, may be knowen, for any place assigned.

This shows how, at all scheduled times, the exact, usual names for time can be known for any given location.

Zographie,

Zography,

Which demon­strateth and teacheth, how, the Inter­section of all visuall Pyramids, made by any plaine assigned (the Center, distance, and lightes being deter­mined) may be, by lines, and proper colours repre­sented.

Which demonstrates and teaches how the intersection of all visual pyramids, created by any given plane (with the center, distance, and lights being determined) can be represented by lines and appropriate colors.

Archi­tecture,

Architecture,

Which is a Science garnished with many doctrines, and diuers Instructions: by whose iudgement, all workes by other workmen finished, are iudged.

Which is a science filled with many teachings and various instructions; by whose judgment, all works completed by other workers are evaluated.

Nauigation,

Navigation,

Which demon­strateth, how, by the Shortest good way, by the aptest direction, and in the shortest time: a suffi­cient Shippe, betwene any two places (in passage nauigable) assigned, may be conducted: and in all stormes and naturall distur­bances chauncing, how to vse the best possible meanes, to recouer the place first assigned.

This shows how, by the shortest and most effective route, and in the least amount of time, a suitable ship can be navigated between any two designated points (in navigable passage). It also explains how to use the best possible methods to reach the originally assigned location during storms and natural disturbances.

Thaumaturgike,

Magic,

Which geueth certaine order to make straunge workes, of the sense to be perceiued: and of men greatly to be wondred at.

Which gives a specific way to create strange works that can be perceived by the senses, and that make people truly marvel.

 

Arche­mastrie,

Archemastry,

Which teacheth to bring to actuall experience sensible, all worthy conclu­sions, by all the Artes Mathe­maticall purposed: and by true Naturall philo­sophie, concluded: And both addeth to them a farder Scope, in the termes of the same Artes: and also, by his proper Method, and in peculiar termes, procedeth, with helpe of the forsayd Artes, to the perfor­mance of complete Experi­ences: which, of no parti­cular Arte, are hable (Formally) to be challenged.

Which teaches how to bring valuable conclusions to actual experience through all the mathematical arts. By using true natural philosophy, it reaches additional understanding in the terms of those arts. Additionally, through its own method and specific terminology, it works together with the aforementioned arts to achieve complete experiences, which cannot be formally challenged by any particular art.


Title Page Text

full text below

full text below

THE ELEMENTS
Of Geometry
of the most auncient
Philosopher
EVCLIDE
of Megara.
Faithfully (now first) translated
into the Englishe toung, by
H. Billingsley, Citizen of London.
Whereunto are annexed certaine
Commentaries, Annotations, and Innovations,
from the best Mathematicians,
both from the past and
in our current age.

With a very fruitfull Præface made by M. I. Dee,
specifying the chiefe Mathematicall Sciẽces, what
they are, and how useful they are: where, also, some new mathematical and mechanical secrets are revealed, which have been largely overlooked until now.

Imprinted at London by Iohn Daye.
Transcriber’s Footnotes

A. Mathematical Notation. John Dee used the “root” sign √ in combination with some less familiar symbols:

A. Mathematical Notation. John Dee used the square root sign √ along with some lesser-known symbols:

‘power of 1’ symbol

“First power”, here used to express an unknown. Shown in this e-text as X (capitalized).

“First power,” used here to indicate something unknown. Represented in this e-text as X (capitalized).

square root

Root sign combined with “second power” symbol = square root. Shown in this e-text as 2√.

Root sign combined with the “second power” symbol = square root. Shown in this e-text as 2√.

cube root

Root sign combined with “third power” symbol = cube root. Shown in this e-text as 3√.

Root sign combined with the “third power” symbol = cube root. Shown in this e-text as 3√.

cube root

Doubled “second power” symbol = 4th power; with root sign = fourth root. Shown in this e-text as 4√.

Doubled “second power” symbol = 4th power; with root sign = fourth root. Shown in this e-text as 4√.

B. Diagrams: The symbol drawn as P (Pounds) is shown here as P. See above for X symbol.

B. Diagrams: The symbol represented as P (Pounds) is displayed here as P. Refer to the previous section for the X symbol.

                            HOTE
                              +C
                              |
                              |
                              +
                              |
                              |
                              +
                              |
                              |
                              +E
                              |
MOIST                  A  TEMPERATE                B     DRYE
  +------+------+------+------+------+------+------+------+
                              |D
                              |
                              +
                              |
                              |
                              +
                              |
                              |
                              +
                              |
                              |
                              +
                            COLD
 _____________________
|         |           |
| {P}. 2. |  Hote. 4. |
|         |           |
| {P}. 1. |  Hote. 3. |
|_________|___________|
The text is too short and lacks sufficient context to be modernized.

C. “Vergilius teaches in his Georgikes.” The quoted lines, with breaks at each “&c.”, are 438-439; 451-457; 463-464.

C. “Vergilius teaches in his Georgics.” The quoted lines, with breaks at each “&c.”, are 438-439; 451-457; 463-464.


Euclid citations

The following Propositions were identified by number.

The following propositions were numbered.

6.12: (How) to find a fourth (line) proportional to three given straight lines.

6.12: How to find a fourth proportional line to three given straight lines.

11.34: In equal parallelepipedal solids the bases are reciprocally proportional to the heights; and those parallelepipedal solids in which the bases are reciprocally proportional to the heights are equal.

11.34: In equal parallelepiped solids, the bases are inversely proportional to the heights; and those parallelepiped solids in which the bases are inversely proportional to the heights are equal.

11.36: If three straight lines are proportional, then the parallelepipedal solid formed out of the three equals the parallelepipedal solid on the mean which is equilateral, but equiangular with the aforesaid solid.

11.36: If three straight lines are proportional, then the solid shape made from the three is the same as the solid shape that is balanced and equal in angles to the one previously mentioned.

12.1: Similar polygons inscribed in circles are to one another as the squares on their diameters.

12.1: Similar polygons inscribed in circles are proportional to the squares of their diameters.

12.2: Circles are to one another as the squares on their diameters.

12.2: Circles relate to each other like the squares of their diameters.

12.18 (“last”): Spheres are to one another in triplicate ratio of their respective diameters.

12.18 (“last”): The spheres relate to each other in a threefold ratio of their respective diameters.


Notes on the text

The Greek letter η (eta) was consistently printed as if it were the ou-ligature ȣ.

The Greek letter η (eta) was consistently printed as if it were the ou-ligature ȣ.

The Latin -que was written as an abbreviation resembling -q´;. It is shown here as que.

The Latin -que was written as an abbreviation that looked like -q´;. It's presented here as que.

Less common words include “fatch” (probably used as a variant of “fetch”) and the mathematical terms “sexagene” and “sexagesme”.

Less common words include “fatch” (likely a variant of “fetch”) and the mathematical terms “sexagene” and “sexagesme.”


Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!