This is a modern-English version of The Life of Charles Dickens, Vol. I-III, Complete, originally written by Forster, John.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
THE LIFE
OF


THE LIFE
OF
CHARLES DICKENS
BY
JOHN FORSTER.
THREE VOLUMES IN TWO.
VOL. I.
————————
BOSTON:
JAMES R. OSGOOD & COMPANY,
(LATE TICKNOR & FIELDS, AND FIELDS, OSGOOD, & CO.)
1875.
THE LIFE
OF
CHARLES DICKENS
BY
JOHN FORSTER.
VOL. I.
1812-1842.
DAUGHTERS OF CHARLES DICKENS,
M Y G O D - D A U G H T E R M A R Y
AND
HER SISTER KATE,
This Book is Dedicated
BY THEIR FRIEND,
AND THEIR FATHER'S FRIEND AND EXECUTOR,
JOHN FORSTER
NOTE TO THE PRESENT EDITION.
Such has been the rapidity of the demand for successive impressions of this book, that I have found it impossible, until now, to correct at pages 31, 87, and 97 three errors of statement made in the former editions; and some few other mistakes, not in themselves important, at pages 96, 101, and 102. I take the opportunity of adding that the mention at p. 83 is not an allusion to the well-known "Penny" and "Saturday" Magazines, but to weekly periodicals of some years' earlier date resembling them in form. One of them, I have since found from a later mention by Dickens himself, was presumably of a less wholesome and instructive character. "I used," he says, "when I was at school, to take in the Terrific Register, making myself unspeakably miserable, and frightening my very wits out of my head, for the small charge of a penny weekly; which, considering that there was an illustration to every number in which there was always a pool of blood, and at least one body, was cheap." An obliging correspondent writes to me upon my reference to the Fox-under-the-hill, at p. 62: "Will you permit me to say that the house, shut up and almost ruinous, is still to be found at the bottom of a curious and most precipitous court, the entrance of which is just past Salisbury Street. . . . It was once, I think, the approach to the halfpenny boats. The house is now shut out from the water-side by the Embankment."
Such has been the speed of demand for new copies of this book that I’ve found it impossible, until now, to fix the three errors in the text at pages 31, 87, and 97 from previous editions; along with a few other mistakes, which aren’t significant on their own, at pages 96, 101, and 102. I’d like to clarify that the mention on p. 83 isn’t referring to the well-known "Penny" and "Saturday" Magazines, but to weekly publications from several years prior that are similar in format. One of them, as I have learned from a later comment by Dickens himself, was likely less wholesome and educational. "I used," he says, "when I was in school, to subscribe to the Terrific Register, making myself absolutely miserable and scaring myself silly, for the low price of a penny a week; which, considering each issue had an illustration that always featured a pool of blood and at least one corpse, was a bargain." A helpful reader wrote to me regarding my mention of the Fox-under-the-hill at p. 62: "Will you allow me to mention that the house, which is closed and nearly in ruins, is still located at the end of a unique and very steep alley, the entrance of which is just past Salisbury Street... I believe it once served as the entrance to the halfpenny boats. The house is now cut off from the riverside by the Embankment."
Palace Gate House, Kensington,
23d December, 1871.
Kensington Palace Gate House,
December 23, 1871.
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
————————
CHAPTER I. 1812-1822. | ||
Pages 21-46. | ||
Childhood. Age. 1-10. | ||
page | ||
Birth at Landport in Portsea | 21 | |
Family of John Dickens | 22 | |
Powers of observation in children | 23 | |
Two years old | 23 | |
In London, æt. 2-3 | 23 | |
In Chatham, æt. 4-9 | 23 | |
Vision of boyhood | 24 | |
The queer small child | 25 | |
Mother's teaching | 26 | |
Day-school in Rome Lane | 27 | |
Retrospects of childhood | 27 | |
David Copperfield and Charles Dickens | 28 | |
Access to small but good library | 29 | |
Tragedy-writing | 30 | |
Comic-song singing | 31 | |
Cousin James Lamert | 31 | |
First taken to theatre | 32 | |
At Mr. Giles's school | 32 | |
Encored in the recitations | 33 | |
Boyish recollections | 33 | |
Birthplace of his fancy | 35 | |
Last night in Chatham | 35 | |
In London | 36 | |
First impressions | 36 | |
Bayham Street, Camden-town | 36 | |
Faculty of early observation | 37 | |
His description of his father | 38 | |
Small theatre made for him | 38 | |
Sister Fanny at Royal Academy of Music | 39 | |
Walks about London | 39 | |
Biography and autobiography | 40 | |
At his godfather's and his uncle's | 41 | |
First efforts at description | 42 | |
"Res Angusta Domi" | 42 | |
Mother exerting herself | 43 | |
Father in the Marshalsea | 43 | |
Visit to the prison | 44 | |
Captain Porter | 44 | |
Old friends disposed of | 45 | |
At the pawnbroker's | 46 | |
CHAPTER II. 1822-1824. | ||
Pages 47-70. | ||
Tough Experiences in Childhood. Æt. 10-12. | ||
Mr. Dilke's half-crown | 48 | |
Story of boyhood told | 48 | |
D. C. and C. D. | 48 | |
Enterprise of the cousins Lamert | 49 | |
First employment in life | 51 | |
Blacking-warehouse | 51 | |
A poor little drudge | 52 | |
Bob Fagin and Poll Green | 52 | |
"Facilis Descensus" | 52 | |
Crushed hopes | 53 | |
The home in Gower Street | 53 | |
Regaling alamode | 54 | |
Home broken up | 54 | |
[viii]At Mrs. Roylance's in Camden-town | 55 | |
Sundays in prison | 55 | |
Pudding-shops and coffee-shops | 56 | |
What was and might have been | 57 | |
Thomas and Harry | 58 | |
A lodging in Lant Street | 59 | |
Meals in the Marshalsea | 59 | |
C. D. and the Marchioness | 60 | |
Originals of Garland family | 60 | |
Adventure with Bob Fagin | 61 | |
Saturday-night shows | 61 | |
Appraised officially | 62 | |
Publican and wife at Cannon Row | 63 | |
Marshalsea incident in Copperfield | 64 | |
Incident as it occurred | 65 | |
Materials for Pickwick | 66 | |
Sister Fanny's musical prize | 66 | |
From Hungerford Stairs to Chandos Street | 67 | |
Father's quarrel with James Lamert | 68 | |
Quits the warehouse | 68 | |
Bitter associations of servitude | 69 | |
What became of the blacking business | 70 | |
CHAPTER III. 1824-1830. | ||
Pages 71-95. | ||
School Days and Starting in Life. Age. 12-18. | ||
Outcome of boyish trials | 71 | |
Disadvantage in later years | 72 | |
Advantages | 73 | |
Next move in life | 74 | |
Wellington House Academy | 74 | |
Revisited and described | 75 | |
Letter from a schoolfellow | 76 | |
C. D.'s recollections of school | 77 | |
Schoolfellow's recollections of C. D. | 77 | |
Fac-simile of schoolboy letter | 79 | |
Daniel Tobin | 81 | |
Another schoolfellow's recollections | 82 | |
Writing tales and getting up plays | 83 | |
Master Beverley scene-painter | 84 | |
Street-acting | 84 | |
The schoolfellows after forty years | 85 | |
Smallness of the world | 86 | |
In attorneys' offices | 87 | |
At minor theatres | 88 | |
The father on the son's education | 89 | |
Studying short-hand | 90 | |
In British Museum reading-room | 90 | |
Preparing for the gallery | 91 | |
D. C. for C. D. | 91 | |
A real Dora in 1829 | 92 | |
The same Dora in 1855 | 93 | |
Dora changed into Flora | 94 | |
Ashes of youth and hope | 95 | |
CHAPTER IV. 1831-1835. | ||
Pages 96-106. | ||
Reporters' Gallery and News Writing. | ||
Æt. 19-23. | ||
Reporting for True Sun | 96 | |
First seen by me | 97 | |
Reporting for Mirror and Chronicle | 97 | |
First published piece | 97 | |
Discipline and experiences of reporting | 98 | |
Life as a reporter | 99 | |
John Black | 100 | |
Mr. Thomas Beard | 101 | |
A letter to his editor | 102 | |
Incident of reporting days | 102 | |
The same more correctly told | 103 | |
Origin of "Boz" | 104 | |
Captain Holland | 104 | |
Mr. George Hogarth | 105 | |
Sketches in Evening Chronicle | 105 | |
C. D.'s first hearty appreciator | 106 | |
[ix] | ||
CHAPTER V. 1836. | ||
Pages 107-115. | ||
First Book, and Origin of Pickwick. Age. 24. | ||
Sketches by Boz | 107 | |
Fancy-piece by N. P. Willis: a poor English author | 107 | |
Start of Pickwick | 108 | |
Marriage to Miss Hogarth | 108 | |
First connection with Chapman & Hall | 109 | |
Mr. Seymour's part in Pickwick | 109 | |
Letters relating thereto | 110 | |
C. D.'s own account | 110 | |
False claims refuted | 111 | |
Pickwick's original, his figure and his name | 112 | |
First sprightly runnings of genius | 113 | |
The Sketches characterized | 114 | |
Mr. Seymour's death | 115 | |
New illustrator chosen | 115 | |
Mr. Hablot K. Browne | 115 | |
C. D. leaves the gallery | 116 | |
Strange Gentleman and Village Coquettes | 116 | |
CHAPTER VI. 1837. | ||
Pages 117-140. | ||
Writing the Pickwick Papers. Age. 25. | ||
First letter from him | 117 | |
As he was thirty-five years ago | 118 | |
Mrs. Carlyle and Leigh Hunt | 119 | |
Birth of eldest son | 119 | |
From Furnival's Inn to Doughty Street | 119 | |
A long-remembered sorrow | 120 | |
I visit him | 120 | |
Hasty compacts with publishers | 121 | |
Self-sold into quasi-bondage | 121 | |
Agreements for editorship and writing | 121 | |
Mr. Macrone's scheme to reissue Sketches | 122 | |
Attempts to prevent it | 123 | |
Exorbitant demand | 123 | |
Impatience of suspense | 123 | |
Purchase advised | 124 | |
Oliver Twist | 125 | |
Characters real to himself | 125 | |
Sense of responsibility for his writings | 126 | |
Criticism that satisfied him | 126 | |
Help given with his proofs | 126 | |
Writing Pickwick, Nos. 14 and 15 | 127 | |
Scenes in a debtors' prison | 128 | |
A recollection of Smollett | 128 | |
Reception of Pickwick | 129 | |
A popular rage | 129 | |
Mr. Carlyle's "dreadful" story | 130 | |
Secrets of success | 130 | |
Pickwick inferior to later books | 131 | |
Exception for Sam Weller and Mr. Pickwick | 131 | |
Personal habits of C. D. | 132 | |
Reliefs after writing | 133 | |
Natural discontents | 134 | |
The early agreements | 134 | |
Tale to follow Oliver Twist | 135 | |
Compromise with Mr. Bentley | 135 | |
Trip to Flanders | 135 | |
First visit to Broadstairs | 136 | |
Piracies of Pickwick | 137 | |
A sufferer from agreements | 138 | |
First visit to Brighton | 138 | |
What he is doing with Oliver Twist | 139 | |
Reading De Foe | 139 | |
"No Thoroughfare" | 139 | |
Proposed help to Macready | 140 | |
[x] | ||
CHAPTER VII. 1837-1838. | ||
Pages 141-151. | ||
Between Pickwick and Nicholas. Æt. 25-26. | ||
Edits Life of Grimaldi | 141 | |
His own opinion of it | 142 | |
An objection answered | 142 | |
His recollections of 1823 | 142 | |
Completion of Pickwick | 143 | |
A purpose long entertained | 144 | |
Relations with Chapman & Hall | 144 | |
Payments made for Pickwick | 145 | |
Agreement for Nicholas Nickleby | 145 | |
Oliver Twist characterized | 146 | |
Reasons for acceptance with every class | 146 | |
Nightmare of an agreement | 147 | |
Letter to Mr. Bentley | 147 | |
Proposal as to Barnaby Rudge | 148 | |
Result of it | 148 | |
Birth of eldest daughter | 149 | |
Young Gentlemen and Young Couples | 149 | |
First number of Nicholas Nickleby | 150 | |
2d of April, 1838 | 150 | |
CHAPTER VIII. 1838. | ||
Pages 152-164. | ||
Oliver Twist. Age. 26. | ||
Interest in characters at close of Oliver | 152 | |
Writing of the last chapter | 153 | |
Cruikshank illustrations | 154 | |
Etchings for last volume | 154 | |
How executed | 154 | |
Slander respecting them exposed | 155 | |
Falsehood ascribed to the artist | 155 | |
Reputation of the new tale | 156 | |
Its workmanship | 157 | |
Social evils passed away | 157 | |
Living only in what destroyed them | 157 | |
Chief design of the story | 158 | |
Its principal figures | 158 | |
Comedy and tragedy of crime | 159 | |
Reply to attacks | 160 | |
Le Sage, Gay, and Fielding | 160 | |
Likeness to them | 161 | |
Again the shadow of Barnaby | 161 | |
Appeal to Mr. Bentley for delay | 161 | |
A very old story | 162 | |
"Sic vos non vobis" | 162 | |
Barnaby given up by Mr. Bentley | 163 | |
Resignation of Miscellany | 163 | |
Parent parting from child | 164 | |
CHAPTER IX. 1838-1839. | ||
Pages 165-179. | ||
Nicholas Nickleby. | ||
Æt. 26-27. | ||
Doubts of success dispelled | 165 | |
Realities of English life | 166 | |
Characters self-revealed | 167 | |
Miss Bates and Mrs. Nickleby | 167 | |
Smike and Dotheboys | 167 | |
A favorite type of humanity | 168 | |
Sydney Smith and Newman Noggs | 168 | |
Kindliness and breadth of humor | 169 | |
Goldsmith and Smollett | 169 | |
Early and later books | 170 | |
Biographical not critical | 171 | |
Characteristics | 171 | |
Materials for the book | 171 | |
Birthday letter | 172 | |
A difficulty at starting | 172 | |
Never in advance with Nickleby | 173 | |
Always with later books | 173 | |
Enjoying a play | 174 | |
[xi]At the Adelphi | 174 | |
Writing Mrs. Nickleby's love-scene | 175 | |
Sydney Smith vanquished | 175 | |
Winding up the story | 176 | |
Parting from creatures of his fancy | 177 | |
The Nickleby dinner | 178 | |
Persons present | 178 | |
The Maclise portrait | 178 | |
CHAPTER X. 1838-1839. | ||
Pages 180-190. | ||
During and After Nickleby. Age. 26-27. | ||
The Cottage at Twickenham | 180 | |
Daniel Maclise | 180 | |
Ainsworth and other friends | 181 | |
Mr. Stanley of Alderley | 182 | |
Petersham cottage | 182 | |
Childish enjoyments | 182 | |
Writes a farce for Covent Garden | 183 | |
Entered at the Middle Temple | 183 | |
We see Wainewright in Newgate | 184 | |
Oliver Twist and the Quarterly | 184 | |
Hood's Up the Rhine | 185 | |
Shakspeare Society | 185 | |
Birth of second daughter | 186 | |
House-hunting | 186 | |
Barnaby at his tenth page | 186 | |
Letter from Exeter | 187 | |
A landlady and her friends | 187 | |
A home for his father and mother | 188 | |
Autobiographical | 189 | |
Visit to an upholsterer | 189 | |
Visit from the same | 190 | |
CHAPTER XI. 1839. | ||
Pages 191-199. | ||
New Writing Project. Æt. 27-28. | ||
Thoughts for the future | 191 | |
Doubts of old serial form | 192 | |
Suggestion for his publishers | 192 | |
My mediation with them | 193 | |
Proposed weekly publication | 193 | |
Design of it | 193 | |
Old favorites to be revived | 194 | |
Subjects to be dealt with | 194 | |
Chapters on Chambers | 194 | |
Gog and Magog Relaxations | 194 | |
Savage Chronicles | 195 | |
Others as well as himself to write | 195 | |
Travels to Ireland and America in view | 195 | |
Stipulation as to property and payments | 196 | |
Great hopes of success | 197 | |
Assent of his publishers | 197 | |
No planned story | 197 | |
Terms of agreement | 197 | |
Notion for his hero | 198 | |
A name hit upon | 199 | |
Sanguine of the issue | 199 | |
CHAPTER XII. 1840-1841. | ||
Pages 200-216. | ||
The Old Curiosity Shop. Æt. 28-29. | ||
Visit to Walter Landor | 200 | |
First thought of Little Nell | 200 | |
Hopeful of Master Humphrey | 201 | |
A title for the child-story | 202 | |
First sale of Master Humphrey's Clock | 202 | |
Its original plan abandoned | 203 | |
Reasons for this | 203 | |
To be limited to one story | 203 | |
Disadvantages of weekly publication | 204 | |
A favorite description | 204 | |
In Bevis Marks for Sampson Brass | 205 | |
At Lawn House, Broadstairs | 205 | |
Dedication of his first volume to Rogers | 205 | |
[xii]Chapters 43-45 | 206 | |
Dick Swiveller and the Marchioness | 207 | |
Masterpiece of kindly fun | 207 | |
Closing of the tale | 208 | |
Effect upon the writer | 208 | |
Making-believe very much | 209 | |
The end approaching | 209 | |
The realities of fiction | 209 | |
Death of Little Nell | 210 | |
My share in the close | 211 | |
A suggestion adopted by him | 211 | |
Success of the story | 211 | |
Useful lessons | 212 | |
Its mode of construction | 213 | |
Character and characteristics | 213 | |
The art of it | 213 | |
A recent tribute | 214 | |
Harte's "Dickens in Camp" | 215 | |
CHAPTER XIII. 1840. | ||
Pages 217-231. | ||
Devonshire Terrace and Broadstairs. Æt. 28. | ||
A good saying | 217 | |
Landor mystified | 218 | |
The mirthful side of Dickens | 218 | |
Extravagant flights | 218 | |
Humorous despair | 219 | |
Riding exercise | 220 | |
First of the ravens | 220 | |
The groom Topping | 220 | |
The smoky chimneys | 221 | |
Juryman at an inquest | 222 | |
Practical humanity | 222 | |
Publication of Clock's first number | 222 | |
Transfer of Barnaby settled | 223 | |
A true prediction | 224 | |
Revisiting old scenes | 224 | |
C. D. to Chapman & Hall | 224 | |
Terms of sale of Barnaby | 225 | |
A gift to a friend | 226 | |
Final escape from bondage | 226 | |
Published libels about him | 227 | |
Said to be demented | 227 | |
To be insane and turned Catholic | 228 | |
Begging letter-writers | 228 | |
A donkey asked for | 228 | |
Mr. Kindheart | 229 | |
Friendly meetings | 229 | |
Social talk | 229 | |
Reconciling friends | 230 | |
Hint for judging men | 230 | |
CHAPTER XIV. 1841. | ||
Pages 232-248. | ||
Barnaby Rudge. Age. 29. | ||
Advantage in beginning Barnaby | 232 | |
Birth of fourth child and second son | 233 | |
The Raven | 233 | |
A loss in the family | 234 | |
Grip's death | 235 | |
C. D. describes his illness | 235 | |
Family mourners | 236 | |
Apotheosis by Maclise | 237 | |
Grip the second | 239 | |
The inn at Chigwell | 239 | |
A Clock Dinner | 240 | |
Lord Jeffrey in London | 240 | |
The Lamplighter | 240 | |
The Pic Nic Papers | 241 | |
Character of Lord George Gordon | 241 | |
A doubtful fancy | 242 | |
Interest in new labor | 243 | |
Constraints of weekly publication | 243 | |
The prison-riots | 244 | |
A serious illness | 244 | |
Close of Barnaby | 244 | |
Character of the tale | 245 | |
Defects in the plot | 245 | |
The No-Popery riots | 245 | |
Descriptive power displayed | 246 | |
Leading persons in story | 247 | |
Mr. Dennis the hangman | 248 | |
[xiii] | ||
CHAPTER XV. 1841. | ||
Pages 249-262. | ||
Dinner in Edinburgh. Æt. 29. | ||
His son Walter Landor | 249 | |
Dies in Calcutta (1863) | 250 | |
C. D. and the new poor-law | 250 | |
Moore and Rogers | 251 | |
Jeffrey's praise of Little Nell | 251 | |
Resolve to visit Scotland | 251 | |
Edinburgh dinner proposed | 252 | |
Sir David Wilkie's death | 252 | |
Peter Robertson | 253 | |
Professor Wilson | 253 | |
A fancy of Scott | 254 | |
Lionization made tolerable | 254 | |
Thoughts of home | 255 | |
The dinner and speeches | 255 | |
His reception | 256 | |
Wilson's eulogy | 256 | |
Home yearnings | 257 | |
Freedom of city voted to him | 257 | |
Speakers at the dinner | 257 | |
Politics and party influences | 258 | |
Whig jealousies | 259 | |
At the theatre | 260 | |
Hospitalities | 260 | |
Moral of it all | 260 | |
Proposed visit to the Highlands | 261 | |
Maclise and Macready | 261 | |
Guide to the Highlands | 262 | |
Mr. Angus Fletcher (Kindheart) | 262 | |
CHAPTER XVI. 1841. | ||
Pages 263-276. | ||
Highlands Adventures. Æt. 29. | ||
A fright | 264 | |
Fletcher's eccentricities | 264 | |
The Trossachs | 264 | |
The traveler's guide | 265 | |
A comical picture | 265 | |
Highland accommodation | 265 | |
Grand scenery | 266 | |
Changes in route | 267 | |
A waterfall | 267 | |
Entrance to Glencoe | 267 | |
The pass of Glencoe | 268 | |
Loch Leven | 269 | |
A July evening | 269 | |
Postal service at Loch Earn Head | 269 | |
The maid of the inn | 270 | |
Impressions of Glencoe | 270 | |
An adventure | 271 | |
Torrents swollen with rain | 271 | |
Dangerous traveling | 272 | |
Incidents and accidents | 272 | |
Broken-down bridge | 273 | |
A fortunate resolve | 273 | |
Post-boy in danger | 274 | |
The rescue | 274 | |
Narrow escape | 274 | |
A Highland inn and inmates | 275 | |
English comfort at Dalmally | 275 | |
Dinner at Glasgow proposed | 276 | |
Eagerness for home | 276 | |
CHAPTER XVII. 1841. | ||
Pages 277-283. | ||
Again at Broadstairs. Age. 29. | ||
Peel and his party | 277 | |
Getting very radical | 278 | |
Thoughts of colonizing | 278 | |
Political squib by C. D. | 278 | |
Fine old English Tory times | 279 | |
Mesmerism | 280 | |
Metropolitan prisons | 280 | |
Book by a workman | 280 | |
An August day by the sea | 281 | |
Another story in prospect | 281 | |
Clock discontents | 281 | |
New adventure | 282 | |
Agreement for it signed | 282 | |
[xiv]The book that proved to be Chuzzlewit | 283 | |
Peel and Lord Ashley | 283 | |
Visions of America | 283 | |
CHAPTER XVIII. 1841. | ||
Pages 284-291. | ||
Eve of the Trip to America. Age. 29. | ||
Greetings from America | 284 | |
Reply to Washington Irving | 284 | |
Difficulties in the way | 285 | |
Resolve to go | 286 | |
Wish to revisit scenes of boyhood | 286 | |
Proposed book of travel | 286 | |
Arrangements for the journey | 287 | |
Impatience of suspense | 287 | |
Resolve to leave the children | 288 | |
Mrs. Dickens reconciled | 288 | |
A grave illness | 288 | |
Domestic griefs | 289 | |
The old sorrow | 289 | |
At Windsor | 290 | |
Son Walter's christening | 290 | |
At Liverpool with the travelers | 291 | |
CHAPTER XIX. 1842. | ||
Pages 292-309. | ||
First Impressions of America. Æt. 30. | ||
Rough passage | 293 | |
A steamer in a storm | 293 | |
Resigned to the worst | 293 | |
Of himself and fellow-travelers | 294 | |
The Atlantic from deck | 294 | |
The ladies' cabin | 294 | |
Its occupants | 295 | |
Card-playing on the Atlantic | 295 | |
Ship-news | 296 | |
A wager | 297 | |
Halifax harbor | 297 | |
Ship aground | 297 | |
Captain Hewitt | 298 | |
Speaker of House of Assembly | 299 | |
Ovation to C. D. | 299 | |
Arrival at Boston | 300 | |
Incursion of editors | 300 | |
At Tremont House | 300 | |
The welcome | 301 | |
Deputations | 301 | |
Dr. Channing to C. D. | 302 | |
Public appearances | 302 | |
A secretary engaged | 303 | |
Bostonians | 303 | |
General characteristics | 304 | |
Personal notices | 304 | |
Perils of steamers | 305 | |
A home-thought | 305 | |
American institutions | 306 | |
How first impressed | 306 | |
Reasons for the greeting | 306 | |
What was welcomed in C. D. | 307 | |
Old World and New World | 308 | |
Daniel Webster as to C. D. | 308 | |
Channing as to C. D. | 308 | |
Subsequent disappointments | 309 | |
New York invitation to dinner | ![]() | Facing page 309. |
Fac-similes of signatures | ||
Additional fac-similes | ||
New York invitation to ball | ||
Fac-similes of signatures | ||
Additional fac-similes | ||
CHAPTER XX. 1842. | ||
Pages 310-334. | ||
Second Impressions of America. Æt. 30. | ||
Second letter | 310 | |
International copyright | 311 | |
Third letter | 311 | |
The dinner at Boston | 312 | |
Worcester, Springfield, and Hartford | 313 | |
[xv]Queer traveling | 313 | |
Levees at Hartford and New Haven | 313 | |
At Wallingford | 314 | |
Serenades | 314 | |
Cornelius C. Felton | 315 | |
Payment of personal expenses declined | 315 | |
At New York | 315 | |
Irving and Colden | 315 | |
Description of the ball | 316 | |
Newspaper accounts | 317 | |
A phase of character | 317 | |
Opinion in America | 318 | |
International copyright | 318 | |
American authors in regard to it | 319 | |
Outcry against the nation's guest | 319 | |
Declines to be silent on copyright | 319 | |
Speech at dinner | 320 | |
Irving in the chair | 320 | |
Chairman's break-down | 321 | |
An incident afterwards in London | 321 | |
Results of copyright speeches | 322 | |
A bookseller's demand for help | 322 | |
Suggestion for copyright memorial | 323 | |
Henry Clay's opinion | 323 | |
Life in New York | 324 | |
Distresses of popularity | 324 | |
Intentions for future | 325 | |
Refusal of invitations | 325 | |
Going south and west | 325 | |
As to return | 326 | |
Dangers incident to steamers | 326 | |
Slavery | 327 | |
Ladies of America | 327 | |
Party conflicts | 328 | |
Non-arrival of Cunard steamer | 328 | |
Copyright petition for Congress | 328 | |
No hope of the Caledonia | 329 | |
A substitute for her | 330 | |
Anxiety as to letters | 330 | |
Of distinguished Americans | 330 | |
Hotel bills | 331 | |
Thoughts of the children | 331 | |
Acadia takes Caledonia's place | 332 | |
Letter to C. D. from Carlyle | 332 | |
Carlyle on copyright | 332 | |
Argument against stealing | 333 | |
Rob Roy's plan worth bettering | 334 | |
C. D. as to Carlyle | 334 | |
CHAPTER XXI. 1842. | ||
Pages 335-357. | ||
Philadelphia, Washington, and the South. Age. 30. | ||
At Philadelphia | 335 | |
Rule in printing letters | 335 | |
Promise as to railroads | 336 | |
Experience of them | 337 | |
Railway-cars | 337 | |
Charcoal stoves | 337 | |
Ladies' cars | 338 | |
Spittoons | 338 | |
Massachusetts and New York | 339 | |
Police-cells and prisons | 339 | |
House of detention and inmates | 340 | |
Women and boy prisoners | 341 | |
Capital punishment | 342 | |
A house of correction | 342 | |
Four hundred single cells | 343 | |
Comparison with English prisons | 344 | |
Inns and landlords | 344 | |
At Washington | 344 | |
Hotel extortion | 345 | |
Philadelphia penitentiary | 345 | |
The solitary system | 345 | |
Solitary prisoners | 346 | |
Talk with inspectors | 346 | |
Bookseller Carey | 347 | |
Changes of temperature | 347 | |
Henry Clay | 348 | |
Proposed journeyings | 348 | |
Letters from England | 349 | |
Congress and Senate | 349 | |
Leading American statesmen | 349 | |
[xvi]The people of America | 350 | |
Englishmen "located" there | 350 | |
"Surgit amari aliquid" | 351 | |
The copyright petition | 351 | |
At Richmond | 351 | |
Irving appointed to Spain | 352 | |
Experience of a slave city | 353 | |
Incidents of slave-life | 353 | |
Discussion with a slaveholder | 353 | |
Feeling of South to England | 354 | |
Levees at Richmond | 354 | |
One more banquet accepted | 355 | |
My gift of Shakspeare | 355 | |
Home letters and fancies | 356 | |
Self-reproach of a noble nature | 356 | |
Washington Irving's leave-taking | 357 | |
CHAPTER XXII. 1842. | ||
Pages 358-380. | ||
Canal-Boat Trips: heading to the Far West. Age. 30. | ||
Character in the letters | 358 | |
The Notes less satisfactory | 359 | |
Personal narrative in letters | 359 | |
The copyright differences | 360 | |
Social dissatisfactions | 360 | |
A fact to be remembered | 361 | |
Literary merits of the letters | 361 | |
Personal character portrayed | 362 | |
On board for Pittsburgh | 362 | |
Choicest passages of Notes | 362 | |
Queer stage-coach | 363 | |
Something revealed on the top | 364 | |
At Harrisburg | 364 | |
Treaties with Indians | 365 | |
Local legislatures | 365 | |
A levee | 365 | |
Morning and night in canal-boat | 366 | |
At and after breakfast | 366 | |
Making the best of it | 367 | |
Hardy habits | 368 | |
By rail across mountain | 368 | |
Mountain scenery | 369 | |
New settlements | 369 | |
Original of Eden in Chuzzlewit | 369 | |
A useful word | 370 | |
Party in America | 371 | |
Home news | 371 | |
Meets an early acquaintance | 372 | |
"Smallness of the world" | 372 | |
Queer customers at levees | 372 | |
Our anniversary | 373 | |
The Cincinnati steamer | 374 | |
Frugality in water and linen | 374 | |
Magnetic experiments | 375 | |
Life-preservers | 376 | |
Bores | 376 | |
Habits of neatness | 377 | |
Wearying for home | 377 | |
Another solitary prison | 378 | |
New terror to loneliness | 378 | |
Arrival at Cincinnati | 378 | |
Two judges in attendance | 379 | |
The city described | 379 | |
On the pavement | 380 | |
CHAPTER XXIII. 1842. | ||
Pages 381-406. | ||
The Far West: to Niagara Falls. Age. 30. | ||
Descriptions in letters and in Notes | 381 | |
Outline of westward travel | 382 | |
An Arabian-Night city | 383 | |
A temperance festival | 383 | |
A party at Judge Walker's | 383 | |
The party from another view | 384 | |
Young lady's description of C. D. | 384 | |
Mournful results of boredom | 385 | |
Down the Mississippi | 386 | |
Listening and watching | 386 | |
A levee at St. Louis | 386 | |
Compliments | 387 | |
Lord Ashburton's arrival | 387 | |
Talk with a judge on slavery | 388 | |
A black burnt alive | 388 | |
[xvii]Feeling of slaves themselves | 389 | |
American testimony | 389 | |
Pretty little scene | 390 | |
A mother and her husband | 390 | |
The baby | 391 | |
St. Louis in sight | 392 | |
Meeting of wife and husband | 392 | |
Trip to a prairie | 393 | |
On the prairie at sunset | 393 | |
General character of scenery | 394 | |
The prairie described | 394 | |
Disappointment and enjoyment | 394 | |
Soirée at Planter's House Inn | 395 | |
Good fare | 395 | |
No gray heads in St. Louis | 396 | |
Dueling | 396 | |
Mrs. Dickens as a traveler | 397 | |
From Cincinnati to Columbus | 397 | |
What a levee is like | 398 | |
From Columbus to Sandusky | 398 | |
The travelers alone | 399 | |
A log house inn | 400 | |
Making tidy | 400 | |
A monetary crisis | 400 | |
Americans not a humorous people | 401 | |
The only recreations | 401 | |
From Sandusky to Buffalo | 402 | |
On Lake Erie | 402 | |
Reception and consolation of a mayor | 403 | |
From Buffalo to Niagara | 403 | |
Nearing the Falls | 404 | |
The Horse-shoe | 404 | |
Effect upon him of Niagara | 405 | |
The old recollection | 405 | |
Looking forward | 406 | |
CHAPTER XXIV. 1842. | ||
Pages 407-418. | ||
Niagara and Montreal. At. 30. | ||
Last two letters | 407 | |
Dickens vanquished | 407 | |
Obstacles to copyright | 408 | |
Two described | 408 | |
Value of literary popularity | 409 | |
Substitute for literature | 410 | |
The secretary described | 410 | |
His paintings | 411 | |
The lion and —— | 411 | |
Toryism of Toronto | 412 | |
Canadian attentions | 412 | |
Proposed theatricals | 413 | |
Last letter | 413 | |
The private play | 414 | |
Stage manager's report | 414 | |
Bill of the performance | 415 | |
The lady performers | 417 | |
A touch of Crummles | 417 | |
Home | 418 |
page | |
Autograph of C. D. (1837) | Fly-leaf |
C. D. æt. 27. From Maclise's Painting, by Graves, A.R.A. | Title-page |
Fac-simile of Letter written in Boyhood | 79 |
Outline of the Maclise Painting of 1839. Engraved by Jeens | 178 |
Apotheosis of Grip the Raven, by Maclise, R.A. | 237 |
Fac-simile of C. D.'s autograph signature Boz (1841) | 276 |
Fac-simile of Invitation to the Public Dinner in New York, with the signatures | 309 |
Fac-simile of Invitation to the Public Ball in New York, with the signatures | 309 |
Fac-simile of the Bill of the Private Play in Canada | 415 |
THE LIFE
OF
CHARLES DICKENS.
CHAPTER I.
CHILDHOOD
1812-1822.
Charles Dickens, the most popular novelist of the century, and one of the greatest humorists that England has produced, was born at Landport in Portsea on Friday, the 7th of February, 1812.[22]
Charles Dickens, the most famous novelist of the century and one of the greatest humorists England has ever produced, was born in Landport, Portsea, on Friday, February 7, 1812.[22]
His father, John Dickens, a clerk in the Navy-pay office, was at this time stationed in the Portsmouth dockyard. He had made acquaintance with the lady, Elizabeth Barrow, who became afterwards his wife, through her elder brother, Thomas Barrow, also engaged on the establishment at Somerset House; and she bore him in all a family of eight children, of whom two died in infancy. The eldest, Fanny (born 1810), was followed by Charles (entered in the baptismal register of Portsea as Charles John Huffham, though on the very rare occasions when he subscribed that name he wrote Huffam); by another son, named Alfred, who died in childhood; by Letitia (born 1816); by another daughter, Harriet, who died also in childhood; by Frederick (born 1820); by Alfred Lamert (born 1822); and by Augustus (born 1827); of all of whom only the second daughter now survives.
His father, John Dickens, was a clerk in the Navy pay office and was stationed at the Portsmouth dockyard at that time. He met Elizabeth Barrow, who later became his wife, through her older brother, Thomas Barrow, who also worked at Somerset House. Together, they had a total of eight children, though two died in infancy. Their first child, Fanny (born 1810), was followed by Charles (listed in the baptismal register of Portsea as Charles John Huffham, but he rarely signed that name and wrote Huffam instead); then came another son, Alfred, who died in childhood; Letitia (born 1816); another daughter, Harriet, who also died in childhood; Frederick (born 1820); Alfred Lamert (born 1822); and Augustus (born 1827). Out of all of them, only the second daughter is still alive.
Walter Scott tells us, in his fragment of autobiography, speaking of the strange remedies applied to his lameness, that he remembered lying on the floor in the parlor of his grandfather's farm-house, swathed up in a sheepskin warm from the body of the sheep, being then not three years old. David Copperfield's memory goes beyond this. He represents himself seeing so far back into the blank of his infancy as to discern therein his mother and her servant, dwarfed to his sight by stooping down or kneeling on the floor, and himself going unsteadily from the one to the other. He admits this may be fancy, though he believes the power of observation in numbers of very young children to be quite wonderful for its closeness and accuracy, and thinks that the recollection of most of us can go farther back into such times[23] than many of us suppose. But what he adds is certainly not fancy. "If it should appear from anything I may set down in this narrative that I was a child of close observation, or that as a man I have a strong memory of my childhood, I undoubtedly lay claim to both of these characteristics." Applicable as it might be to David Copperfield, this was simply and unaffectedly true of Charles Dickens.
Walter Scott shares in his autobiography that he remembers lying on the floor in the parlor of his grandfather's farmhouse, wrapped in a warm sheepskin fresh from the sheep, when he was not yet three years old. David Copperfield’s memory stretches even further back. He describes being able to recall his mother and her servant, who seemed small to him because they were bent down or kneeling on the floor, while he moved unsteadily between the two. He acknowledges that this could be just his imagination, but he believes that many very young children have an incredible ability to observe things closely and accurately. He thinks that most of us can remember further back into our early years than we realize. However, what he adds is definitely not just imagination. "If it seems from anything I write in this story that I was a child who observed things closely, or that as an adult I have a strong memory of my childhood, then I definitely claim both of these traits." While this statement applies to David Copperfield, it was simply and genuinely true of Charles Dickens.
He has often told me that he remembered the small front garden to the house at Portsea, from which he was taken away when he was two years old, and where, watched by a nurse through a low kitchen-window almost level with the gravel walk, he trotted about with something to eat, and his little elder sister with him. He was carried from the garden one day to see the soldiers exercise; and I perfectly recollect that, on our being at Portsmouth together while he was writing Nickleby, he recognized the exact shape of the military parade seen by him as a very infant, on the same spot, a quarter of a century before.
He has often told me how he remembers the small front garden of the house in Portsea, where he was taken away when he was two years old. He would be watched by a nurse through a low kitchen window almost level with the gravel path, as he wandered around with something to eat, alongside his little older sister. One day, he was taken from the garden to watch the soldiers drill. I clearly remember that when we were in Portsmouth together, while he was writing Nickleby, he recognized the exact shape of the military parade he had seen as a toddler, right in that same spot, twenty-five years earlier.
When his father was again brought up by his duties to London from Portsmouth, they went into lodgings in Norfolk Street, Middlesex Hospital; and it lived also in the child's memory that they had come away from Portsea in the snow. Their home, shortly after, was again changed, on the elder Dickens being placed upon duty in Chatham dockyard; and the house where he lived in Chatham, which had a plain-looking whitewashed plaster front and a small garden before and behind, was in St. Mary's Place, otherwise called the Brook, and next door to a Baptist meeting-house called Providence Chapel, of which a Mr. Giles, to be presently[24] mentioned, was minister. Charles at this time was between four and five years old;[1] and here he stayed till he was nine. Here the most durable of his early impressions were received; and the associations that were around him when he died were those which at the outset of his life had affected him most strongly.
When his father was called back to London from Portsmouth for work, they moved into a place on Norfolk Street near Middlesex Hospital. The child also remembered that they left Portsea in the snow. Soon after, their home changed again when the older Dickens was assigned to Chatham dockyard. The house they lived in at Chatham had a simple whitewashed plaster front and a small garden in the front and back. It was located on St. Mary's Place, also known as the Brook, right next to a Baptist meeting house called Providence Chapel, where a Mr. Giles, who will be mentioned shortly, was the minister. At this time, Charles was between four and five years old, and he lived there until he was nine. Here, he formed the most lasting of his early memories, and the connections he had in this place were the ones that influenced him the most throughout his life.
The house called Gadshill Place stands on the strip of highest ground in the main road between Rochester and Gravesend. Often had we traveled past it together, years and years before it became his home, and never without some allusion to what he told me when first I saw it in his company, that amid the recollections connected with his childhood it held always a prominent place, for, upon first seeing it as he came from Chatham with his father, and looking up at it with much admiration, he had been promised that he might himself live in it, or in some such house, when he came to be a man, if he would only work hard enough. Which for a long time was his ambition. The story is a pleasant one, and receives authentic confirmation at the opening of one of his essays on traveling abroad, when as he passes along the road to Canterbury there crosses it a vision of his former self:
The house known as Gadshill Place is on the highest ground along the main road between Rochester and Gravesend. We often drove past it together, long before it became his home, and each time I remembered what he told me when I first saw it with him: that it had always held a special place in his childhood memories. When he first saw it while coming back from Chatham with his father, he admired it greatly and was promised that he could live there, or in a similar house, when he grew up, if he worked hard enough. For a long time, that was his goal. It's a nice story, which he confirms in one of his essays about traveling abroad, when he recalls passing the road to Canterbury and seeing a vision of his younger self.
"So smooth was the old high-road, and so fresh were[25] the horses, and so fast went I, that it was midway between Gravesend and Rochester, and the widening river was bearing the ships, white-sailed or black-smoked, out to sea, when I noticed by the wayside a very queer small boy.
"So smooth was the old highway, and so fresh were[25] the horses, and I was going so fast, that it was halfway between Gravesend and Rochester, and the expanding river was carrying the ships, some with white sails and others with black smoke, out to sea, when I noticed a very strange little boy by the side of the road."
"'Holloa!' said I to the very queer small boy, 'where do you live?'
"'Hey!' I said to the very strange little boy, 'where do you live?'"
"'At Chatham,' says he.
"'At Chatham,' he says."
"'What do you do there?' says I.
"'What do you do there?' I ask."
"'I go to school,' says he.
'I go to school,' he says.
"I took him up in a moment, and we went on. Presently, the very queer small boy says, 'This is Gadshill we are coming to, where Falstaff went out to rob those travelers, and ran away.'
"I picked him up in no time, and we continued on. Soon, the really strange little boy says, 'We're coming to Gadshill, where Falstaff went out to rob those travelers and then ran away.'"
"'You know something about Falstaff, eh?' said I.
"'You know something about Falstaff, right?' I said."
"'All about him,' said the very queer small boy. 'I am old (I am nine), and I read all sorts of books. But do let us stop at the top of the hill, and look at the house there, if you please!'
"'All around him,' said the very strange little boy. 'I'm old (I'm nine), and I read all kinds of books. But please let’s stop at the top of the hill and look at the house over there!'
"'You admire that house?' said I.
"'You like that house?' I asked."
"'Bless you, sir,' said the very queer small boy, 'when I was not more than half as old as nine, it used to be a treat for me to be brought to look at it. And now I am nine, I come by myself to look at it. And ever since I can recollect, my father, seeing me so fond of it, has often said to me, If you were to be very persevering and were to work hard, you might some day come to live in it. Though that's impossible!' said the very queer small boy, drawing a low breath, and now staring at the house out of window with all his might.
"‘Bless you, sir,’ said the very strange little boy, ‘when I was just a little younger than nine, it was such a treat for me to be taken to see it. Now that I’m nine, I come by myself to look at it. Ever since I can remember, my dad, noticing how much I love it, has often told me, If you work really hard and stick with it, you might someday get to live in it. Though that’s just impossible!’ said the very strange little boy, taking a deep breath and now staring at the house out the window with all his might."
"I was rather amazed to be told this by the very queer small boy; for that house happens to be[26] my house, and I have reason to believe that what he said was true."
"I was pretty surprised to hear this from the very strange little boy; because that house happens to be[26] my house, and I have good reason to believe that what he said was true."
The queer small boy was indeed his very self. He was a very little and a very sickly boy. He was subject to attacks of violent spasm which disabled him for any active exertion. He was never a good little cricket-player. He was never a first-rate hand at marbles, or peg-top, or prisoner's base. But he had great pleasure in watching the other boys, officers' sons for the most part, at these games, reading while they played; and he had always the belief that this early sickness had brought to himself one inestimable advantage, in the circumstance of his weak health having strongly inclined him to reading. It will not appear, as my narrative moves on, that he owed much to his parents, or was other than in his first letter to Washington Irving he described himself to have been, a "very small and not-over-particularly-taken-care-of boy;" but he has frequently been heard to say that his first desire for knowledge, and his earliest passion for reading, were awakened by his mother, who taught him the first rudiments not only of English, but also, a little later, of Latin. She taught him regularly every day for a long time, and taught him, he was convinced, thoroughly well. I once put to him a question in connection with this to which he replied in almost exactly the words he placed five years later in the mouth of David Copperfield: "I faintly remember her teaching me the alphabet; and when I look upon the fat black letters in the primer, the puzzling novelty of their shapes, and the easy good nature of O and S, always seem to present themselves before me as they used to do."[27]
The queer little boy was truly himself. He was very small and quite sickly. He often experienced severe spasms that left him unable to participate in any active activities. He was never good at cricket. He wasn't a top player at marbles, or spinning tops, or tag. But he took great joy in watching the other boys, mostly officers' sons, play those games while he read. He always believed that his early sickness gave him one invaluable advantage: his poor health pushed him toward reading. As my story unfolds, it will become clear that he didn't owe much to his parents, nor was he anything other than what he described himself as in his first letter to Washington Irving, a "very small and not-over-particularly-taken-care-of boy." However, he often said that his initial desire for knowledge and early love of reading were sparked by his mother, who taught him the basics not only of English but also, a bit later, Latin. She taught him regularly every day for a long time, and he was certain she taught him very well. I once asked him a question related to this, to which he replied almost exactly in the words he later put in the mouth of David Copperfield: "I faintly remember her teaching me the alphabet; and when I look at the fat black letters in the primer, the puzzling novelty of their shapes, and the easy good nature of O and S, always seem to come to mind as they used to."[27]
Then followed the preparatory day-school, a school for girls and boys to which he went with his sister Fanny, and which was in a place called Rome (pronounced Room) Lane. Revisiting Chatham in his manhood, and looking for the place, he found it had been pulled down to make a new street, "ages" before; but out of the distance of the ages arose nevertheless a not dim impression that it had been over a dyer's shop; that he went up steps to it; that he had frequently grazed his knees in doing so; and that in trying to scrape the mud off a very unsteady little shoe, he generally got his leg over the scraper.[2] Other similar memories of childhood have dropped from him occasionally in his lesser writings; whose readers may remember how vividly portions of his boyhood are reproduced in his fancy of the Christmas-tree, and will hardly have forgotten what he says, in his thoughtful little paper on Nurses' stories, of the doubtful places and people to which children may be introduced before they are six years old, and forced, night after night, to go back to against their wills, by servants to whom they[28] are intrusted. That childhood exaggerates what it sees, too, has he not tenderly told? How he thought the Rochester High Street must be at least as wide as Regent Street, which he afterwards discovered to be little better than a lane; how the public clock in it, supposed to be the finest clock in the world, turned out to be as moon-faced and weak a clock as a man's eyes ever saw; and how in its town-hall, which had appeared to him once so glorious a structure that he had set it up in his mind as the model on which the genie of the lamp built the palace for Aladdin, he had painfully to recognize a mere mean little heap of bricks, like a chapel gone demented. Yet not so painfully, either, when second thoughts wisely came. "Ah! who was I that I should quarrel with the town for being changed to me, when I myself had come back, so changed, to it? All my early readings and early imaginations dated from this place, and I took them away so full of innocent construction and guileless belief, and I brought them back so worn and torn, so much the wiser and so much the worse!"
Then came the prep school, a school for girls and boys that he attended with his sister Fanny, located on a street called Rome (pronounced Room) Lane. When he returned to Chatham as an adult and tried to find the place, he discovered it had been torn down to make way for a new street "ages" ago; however, from the distant past, he still had a faint memory that it had been above a dyer's shop; that he had to climb steps to get there; that he often scraped his knees doing so; and that while attempting to clean the mud off a very unsteady little shoe, he usually ended up getting his leg caught on the scraper.[2] Other similar childhood memories have occasionally surfaced in his lesser-known writings; readers might recall how vividly parts of his boyhood are brought to life in his description of the Christmas tree, and they likely won't forget what he said in his thoughtful little essay on nurses' stories about the questionable places and people children might be exposed to before they turn six, and the way they are forced, night after night, to return against their will by the caretakers they're left with. He has also gently reminded us how childhood exaggerates what it sees. How he believed the Rochester High Street must be at least as wide as Regent Street, only to later find it was hardly wider than a lane; how the public clock there, claimed to be the finest in the world, turned out to be as weak-looking and unimpressive as any clock he ever saw; and how the town hall, which once seemed to him a glorious building so much so that he pictured it as the model the genie of the lamp used to create Aladdin's palace, he sadly had to recognize as just a shabby little pile of bricks, like a chapel gone mad. But not too sadly, once he thought it through. "Ah! Who was I to complain about the town changing for me when I had returned so changed myself? All my early readings and imaginations originated from this place, and I left with them so filled with innocent wonder and naive belief, and I returned so worn and torn, so much wiser, yet so much worse off!"
And here I may at once expressly mention, what already has been hinted, that even as Fielding described himself and his belongings in Captain Booth and Amelia, and protested always that he had writ in his books nothing more than he had seen in life, so it may be said of Dickens in more especial relation to David Copperfield. Many guesses have been made since his death, connecting David's autobiography with his own; accounting, by means of such actual experiences, for the so frequent recurrence in his writings of the prison-life, its humor and pathos, described in them with such[29] wonderful reality; and discovering in what David tells Steerforth at school of the stories he had read in his childhood, what it was that had given the bent to his own genius. There is not only truth in all this, but it will very shortly be seen that the identity went deeper than any had supposed, and covered experiences not less startling in the reality than they appear to be in the fiction.
And here I can clearly point out, as has already been suggested, that just like Fielding described himself and his life in Captain Booth and Amelia, claiming he wrote nothing but what he had experienced, the same can be said for Dickens, especially in relation to David Copperfield. Since his death, many have made guesses connecting David's autobiography to Dickens's own life; explaining, through these real experiences, the frequent themes of prison life—its humor and emotional depth—described in his works with such incredible realism. Additionally, when David shares with Steerforth at school the stories he read as a child, it reveals what shaped his own creativity. There’s not only truth in this, but it will soon become clear that the similarities run deeper than anyone realized, encompassing experiences that are as shocking in reality as they appear in fiction.
Of the "readings" and "imaginations" which he describes as brought away from Chatham, this authority can tell us. It is one of the many passages in Copperfield which are literally true, and its proper place is here. "My father had left a small collection of books in a little room up-stairs to which I had access (for it adjoined my own), and which nobody else in our house ever troubled. From that blessed little room, Roderick Random, Peregrine Pickle, Humphrey Clinker, Tom Jones, the Vicar of Wakefield, Don Quixote, Gil Blas, and Robinson Crusoe came out, a glorious host, to keep me company. They kept alive my fancy, and my hope of something beyond that place and time,—they, and the Arabian Nights and the Tales of the Genii,—and did me no harm; for whatever harm was in some of them was not there for me; I knew nothing of it. It is astonishing to me now how I found time, in the midst of my porings and blunderings over heavier themes, to read those books as I did. It is curious to me how I could ever have consoled myself under my small troubles (which were great troubles to me), by impersonating my favorite characters in them. . . . I have been Tom Jones (a child's Tom Jones, a harmless creature) for a week together. I have sustained my own idea of[30] Roderick Random for a month at a stretch, I verily believe. I had a greedy relish for a few volumes of voyages and travels—I forget what, now—that were on those shelves; and for days and days I can remember to have gone about my region of our house, armed with the centre-piece out of an old set of boot-trees: the perfect realization of Captain Somebody, of the royal British Navy, in danger of being beset by savages, and resolved to sell his life at a great price. . . . When I think of it, the picture always rises in my mind, of a summer evening, the boys at play in the churchyard, and I sitting on my bed, reading as if for life. Every barn in the neighborhood, every stone in the church, and every foot of the churchyard, had some association of its own, in my mind, connected with these books, and stood for some locality made famous in them. I have seen Tom Pipes go climbing up the church-steeple; I have watched Strap, with the knapsack on his back, stopping to rest himself upon the wicket-gate; and I know that Commodore Trunnion held that club with Mr. Pickle, in the parlor of our little village ale-house." Every word of this personal recollection had been written down as fact, some years before it found its way into David Copperfield; the only change in the fiction being his omission of the name of a cheap series of novelists then in course of publication, by which his father had become happily the owner of so large a lump of literary treasure in his small collection of books.
Of the "readings" and "imaginations" he talks about as coming from Chatham, this source can tell us. It's one of the many passages in Copperfield that are literally true, and it belongs here. "My father had left a small set of books in a small room upstairs that I could access (since it was next to my own), and no one else in our house ever bothered it. From that blessed little room, Roderick Random, Peregrine Pickle, Humphrey Clinker, Tom Jones, The Vicar of Wakefield, Don Quixote, Gil Blas, and Robinson Crusoe emerged, a wonderful group, to keep me company. They fueled my imagination and my hope for something beyond that place and time—along with The Arabian Nights and The Tales of the Genii—and did me no harm; because whatever harm was in some of them didn’t touch me; I didn’t know anything about it. It's amazing to me now how I found time, amidst all my struggles with heavier subjects, to read those books as I did. It’s curious how I ever managed to console myself under my small troubles (that felt huge to me) by acting out my favorite characters from them. I was Tom Jones (a child’s version of Tom Jones, a harmless character) for a whole week. I think I kept up my idea of Roderick Random for a month straight. I had a strong interest in some travel books—I can't remember which ones now—that were on those shelves; and for days and days, I remember wandering around our house, equipped with the centerpiece from an old set of boot trees: the perfect image of Captain Somebody of the Royal British Navy, in danger of being attacked by savages, resolved to sell his life dearly. When I think of it, I always picture a summer evening, the boys playing in the churchyard, and me sitting on my bed, reading as if my life depended on it. Every barn in the neighborhood, every stone in the church, and every inch of the churchyard had some memory associated with those books, represented some famous location from them. I saw Tom Pipes climbing up the church steeple; I watched Strap with the backpack on his back, stopping to rest at the wicket gate; and I know that Commodore Trunnion held that club with Mr. Pickle in the parlor of our little village pub." Every word of this personal memory was written down as fact, years before it made its way into David Copperfield; the only change in the story was the omission of the name of a low-cost series of novelists that were being published at the time, through which his father became the fortunate owner of a sizable collection of literary treasures within his small set of books.
The usual result followed. The child took to writing, himself, and became famous in his childish circle for having written a tragedy called Misnar, the Sultan of India, founded (and very literally founded, no doubt)[31] on one of the Tales of the Genii. Nor was this his only distinction. He told a story offhand so well, and sang small comic songs so especially well, that he used to be elevated on chairs and tables, both at home and abroad, for more effective display of these talents; and when he first told me of this, at one of the Twelfth-night parties on his eldest son's birthday, he said he never recalled it that his own shrill little voice of childhood did not again tingle in his ears, and he blushed to think what a horrible little nuisance he must have been to many unoffending grown-up people who were called upon to admire him.
The usual outcome followed. The child started writing on his own and became well-known in his circle for writing a tragedy called Misnar, the Sultan of India, which was based (and very literally based, no doubt) [31] on one of the Tales of the Genii. But that wasn't his only achievement. He told stories so well on the spot and sang small comic songs so particularly well that he would be lifted onto chairs and tables, both at home and elsewhere, for a better showcase of these talents; and when he first mentioned this to me at one of the Twelfth-night parties on his eldest son's birthday, he said he couldn’t help but remember how his own shrill little childhood voice would still tingle in his ears, and he felt embarrassed thinking about what a terrible little nuisance he must have been to many unsuspecting adults who had to admire him.
His chief ally and encourager in these displays was a youth of some ability, much older than himself, named James Lamert, stepson to his mother's sister, and therefore a sort of cousin, who was his great patron and friend in his childish days. Mary, the eldest daughter of Charles Barrow, himself a lieutenant in the navy, had for her first husband a commander in the navy called Allen; on whose death by drowning at Rio Janeiro she had joined her sister, the navy-pay clerk's wife, at Chatham; in which place she subsequently took for her second husband Dr. Lamert, an army-surgeon, whose son James, even after he had been sent to Sandhurst for his education, continued still to visit Chatham from time to time. He had a turn for private theatricals; and as his father's quarters were in the ordnance hospital there, a great rambling place otherwise at that time almost uninhabited, he had plenty of room in which to get up his entertainments. The staff-doctor himself played his part, and his portrait will be found in Pickwick.
His main supporter and motivator for these performances was a talented young man named James Lamert, who was much older than him and the stepson of his mother's sister, making him a sort of cousin. James was a significant patron and friend during his childhood. Mary, the eldest daughter of Charles Barrow, a lieutenant in the navy, had her first husband, Commander Allen, who tragically drowned in Rio de Janeiro. After his death, she moved in with her sister, the wife of a navy-pay clerk, in Chatham. There, she later married Dr. Lamert, an army surgeon. His son, James, continued to visit Chatham from time to time, even after he started his education at Sandhurst. He had a passion for amateur theater, and since his father's quarters were located in the ordnance hospital, which was a vast, mostly deserted place at that time, he had plenty of space to organize his shows. The staff doctor also took part in the performances, and you'll find his portrait in Pickwick.
By Lamert, I have often heard him say, he was first[32] taken to the theatre at the very tenderest age. He could hardly, however, have been younger than Charles Lamb, whose first experience was of having seen Artaxerxes when six years old; and certainly not younger than Walter Scott, who was only four when he saw As You Like It on the Bath stage, and remembered having screamed out, Ain't they brothers? when scandalized by Orlando and Oliver beginning to fight.[3] But he was at any rate old enough to recollect how his young heart leaped with terror as the wicked king Richard, struggling for life against the virtuous Richmond, backed up and bumped against the box in which he was; and subsequent visits to the same sanctuary, as he tells us, revealed to him many wondrous secrets, "of which not the least terrific were, that the witches in Macbeth bore an awful resemblance to the thanes and other proper inhabitants of Scotland; and that the good king Duncan couldn't rest in his grave, but was constantly coming out of it and calling himself somebody else."
By Lamert, I’ve often heard him say that he was first taken to the theater at a very young age. However, he couldn’t have been younger than Charles Lamb, who saw Artaxerxes when he was six years old; and he definitely wasn’t younger than Walter Scott, who was only four when he saw As You Like It on the Bath stage and remembered screaming, Ain't they brothers? when he was shocked by Orlando and Oliver starting to fight. But he was at least old enough to remember how his young heart raced with fear as the evil king Richard struggled for life against the virtuous Richmond, backing up against the box he was in; and on later visits to that same place, as he tells us, he discovered many amazing secrets, “of which not the least terrifying were that the witches in Macbeth looked eerily similar to the thanes and other proper residents of Scotland; and that the good king Duncan couldn’t stay in his grave, but kept coming out of it and calling himself someone else.”
During the last two years of Charles's residence at Chatham, he was sent to a school kept in Clover Lane by the young Baptist minister already named, Mr. William Giles. I have the picture of him here, very strongly in my mind, as a sensitive, thoughtful, feeble-bodied little boy, with an unusual sort of knowledge and fancy for such a child, and with a dangerous kind of wandering intelligence that a teacher might turn to[33] good or evil, happiness or misery, as he directed it. Nor does the influence of Mr. Giles, such as it was, seem to have been other than favorable. Charles had himself a not ungrateful sense in after-years that this first of his masters, in his little-cared-for childhood, had pronounced him to be a boy of capacity; and when, about half-way through the publication of Pickwick, his old teacher sent a silver snuff-box with admiring inscription to the "inimitable Boz," it reminded him of praise far more precious obtained by him at his first year's examination in the Clover Lane academy, when his recitation of a piece out of the Humorist's Miscellany about Doctor Bolus had received, unless his youthful vanity bewildered him, a double encore. A habit, the only bad one taught him by Mr. Giles, of taking for a time, in very moderate quantities, the snuff called Irish blackguard, was the result of this gift from his old master; but he abandoned it after some few years, and it was never resumed.
During the last two years of Charles’s time in Chatham, he attended a school run by a young Baptist minister named Mr. William Giles. I can vividly picture him as a sensitive, thoughtful, frail little boy, possessing an unusual kind of knowledge and imagination for his age, along with a risky kind of wandering intelligence that a teacher could direct toward either good or bad outcomes, happiness or misery. The influence of Mr. Giles, for all its worth, seemed mostly positive. In later years, Charles felt a sense of gratitude that his first teacher had recognized him as a capable boy during his neglected childhood. When, about halfway through the publication of Pickwick, his old teacher sent a silver snuff-box with an admiring inscription to the "inimitable Boz," it reminded him of a far more treasured praise he received during his first-year examination at the Clover Lane academy, when his recitation of a piece from the Humorist's Miscellany about Doctor Bolus earned him, unless his youthful pride misled him, a double encore. One bad habit instilled by Mr. Giles was a brief indulgence in the moderately used snuff called Irish blackguard, which came from this gift from his old master; however, he gave it up after a few years, and it was never taken up again.
It was in the boys' playing-ground near Clover Lane in which the school stood, that, according to one of his youthful memories, he had been, in the hay-making time, delivered from the dungeons of Seringapatam, an immense pile "(of haycock)," by his countrymen the victorious British "(boy next door and his two cousins)," and had been recognized with ecstasy by his affianced one "(Miss Green)," who had come all the way from England "(second house in the terrace)" to ransom and marry him. It was in this playing-field, too, as he has himself recorded, he first heard in confidence from one whose father was greatly connected, "being under government," of the existence of a terrible banditti[34] called the radicals, whose principles were that the prince-regent wore stays, that nobody had a right to any salary, and that the army and navy ought to be put down; horrors at which he trembled in his bed, after supplicating that the radicals might be speedily taken and hanged. Nor was it the least of the disappointments of his visit in after-life to the scenes of his boyhood that he found this play-field had been swallowed up by a railway station. It was gone, with its two beautiful trees of hawthorn; and where the hedge, the turf, and all the buttercups and daisies had been, there was nothing but the stoniest of jolting roads.
It was in the boys' playground near Clover Lane where the school was located that, according to one of his childhood memories, he had been rescued during hay-making season from the dungeons of Seringapatam, a massive pile of hay, by his fellow countrymen, the victorious British, represented by the boy next door and his two cousins. He had been joyfully recognized by his fiancée, Miss Green, who had traveled all the way from England to rescue and marry him. It was in this playground, too, as he himself recorded, that he first heard in confidence from someone whose father was well-connected, being in government, about a terrifying group called the radicals. Their beliefs were that the prince-regent wore stays, that no one had the right to any salary, and that the army and navy should be disbanded. He shuddered in bed at the thought of them, praying that the radicals would be quickly caught and hanged. One of the biggest disappointments of his later visit to his childhood haunts was discovering that this playground had been replaced by a railway station. It was gone, along with its two beautiful hawthorn trees, and where the hedge, turf, buttercups, and daisies used to be, there was now nothing but a rough, stone-filled road.
He was not much over nine years old when his father was recalled from Chatham to Somerset House, and he had to leave this good master, and the old place endeared to him by recollections that clung to him afterwards all his life long. It was here he had made the acquaintance not only of the famous books that David Copperfield specially names, of Roderick Random, Peregrine Pickle, Humphrey Clinker, Tom Jones, the Vicar of Wakefield, Don Quixote, Gil Blas, Robinson Crusoe, the Arabian Nights, and the Tales of the Genii, but also of the Spectator, the Tatler, the Idler, the Citizen of the World, and Mrs. Inchbald's Collection of Farces. These latter had been, as well, in the little library to which access was open to him; and of all of them his earliest remembrance was the having read them over and over at Chatham, not for the first, the second, or the third time. They were a host of friends when he had no single friend; and in leaving the place, I have often heard him say, he seemed to be leaving them too, and everything that had given his ailing little life its picturesqueness[35] or sunshine. It was the birthplace of his fancy; and he hardly knew what store he had set by its busy varieties of change and scene, until he saw the falling cloud that was to hide its pictures from him forever. The gay bright regiments always going and coming, the continual paradings and firings, the successions of sham sieges and sham defenses, the plays got up by his cousin in the hospital, the navy-pay yacht in which he had sailed to Sheerness with his father, and the ships floating out in the Medway with their far visions of sea,—he was to lose them all. He was never to watch the boys at their games any more, or see them sham over again the sham sieges and sham defenses. He was to be taken to London inside the stage-coach Commodore; and Kentish woods and fields, Cobham park and hall, Rochester cathedral and castle, and all the wonderful romance together, including the red-cheeked baby he had been wildly in love with, were to vanish like a dream. "On the night before we came away," he told me, "my good master came flitting in among the packing-cases to give me Goldsmith's Bee as a keepsake. Which I kept for his sake, and its own, a long time afterwards." A longer time afterwards he recollected the stage-coach journey, and said in one of his published papers that never had he forgotten, through all the intervening years, the smell of the damp straw in which he was packed and forwarded like game, carriage-paid. "There was no other inside passenger, and I consumed my sandwiches in solitude and dreariness, and it rained hard all the way, and I thought life sloppier than I expected to find it."
He was just over nine years old when his father was called back from Chatham to Somerset House, and he had to leave his good master and the old place, which he cherished for the memories that stuck with him for the rest of his life. It was there that he had gotten to know not only the famous books that David Copperfield specifically mentions, like Roderick Random, Peregrine Pickle, Humphrey Clinker, Tom Jones, the Vicar of Wakefield, Don Quixote, Gil Blas, Robinson Crusoe, the Arabian Nights, and the Tales of the Genii, but also The Spectator, The Tatler, The Idler, The Citizen of the World, and Mrs. Inchbald's Collection of Farces. These had also been part of the small library accessible to him; and his earliest memory was reading them over and over at Chatham, not just the first time, or the second, or the third. They were a bunch of friends when he had no real friends; and when leaving the place, he often said it felt like he was leaving them too, along with everything that made his struggling little life colorful or bright. It was where his imagination was born; and he didn’t realize how much he valued its bustling variety until he saw the dark cloud that would hide its images from him forever. The lively regiments always coming and going, the constant parades and cannon fire, the fake sieges and defenses, the plays his cousin staged in the hospital, the navy-pay yacht in which he sailed to Sheerness with his father, and the ships floating out in the Medway—he was going to lose them all. He wouldn’t be able to watch the boys play again or witness their make-believe sieges and defenses. He was to be taken to London inside the stagecoach named Commodore; and Kentish woods and fields, Cobham park and hall, Rochester cathedral and castle, along with all the wonderful stories—including the rosy-cheeked baby he had been madly in love with—were to vanish like a dream. "On the night before we left," he told me, "my good master slipped in among the packing boxes to give me Goldsmith's Bee as a keepsake. I kept it for his sake, and for its own, for a long time afterwards." Much later, he remembered the stagecoach journey and mentioned in one of his published papers that he had never forgotten, through all the years that followed, the smell of the damp straw in which he was packed and sent off like cargo, shipping paid. "There was no other passenger inside, and I ate my sandwiches in solitude and gloom, and it rained heavily the entire way, making me think life was messier than I’d expected."
The earliest impressions received and retained by him[36] in London were of his father's money involvements; and now first he heard mentioned "the deed," representing that crisis of his father's affairs in fact which is ascribed in fiction to Mr. Micawber's. He knew it in later days to have been a composition with creditors; though at this earlier date he was conscious of having confounded it with parchments of a much more demoniacal description. One result from the awful document soon showed itself in enforced retrenchment. The family had to take up its abode in a house in Bayham Street, Camden-town.
The earliest memories he had from London were of his father's financial troubles; and now he first heard about "the deed," which represented the real crisis of his father's finances that was often fictionalized as Mr. Micawber's situation. Later on, he learned it was a settlement with creditors; but at that time, he mixed it up with documents that had a much darker significance. One consequence of that terrifying document quickly became obvious: they had to cut back on expenses. The family had to move into a house on Bayham Street in Camden Town.
Bayham Street was about the poorest part of the London suburbs then, and the house was a mean small tenement, with a wretched little back-garden abutting on a squalid court. Here was no place for new acquaintances to him: no boys were near with whom he might hope to become in any way familiar. A washerwoman lived next door, and a Bow-Street officer lived over the way. Many, many times has he spoken to me of this, and how he seemed at once to fall into a solitary condition apart from all other boys of his own age, and to sink into a neglected state at home which had been always quite unaccountable to him. "As I thought," he said on one occasion very bitterly, "in the little back-garret in Bayham Street, of all I had lost in losing Chatham, what would I have given, if I had had anything to give, to have been sent back to any other school, to have been taught something anywhere!" He was at another school already, not knowing it. The self-education forced upon him was teaching him, all unconsciously as yet, what, for the future that awaited him, it most behooved him to know.[37]
Bayham Street was one of the poorest areas in the London suburbs at that time, and the house was a shabby little tenement, with a miserable small backyard next to a rundown court. This was no place for him to make new friends: there were no boys around with whom he could get to know. A washerwoman lived next door, and a Bow-Street officer lived across the street. He often talked to me about this, how he felt completely isolated from other boys his age, and how he seemed to fall into a neglected state at home that he could never really understand. "As I thought," he said one time, very bitterly, "in that tiny back garret in Bayham Street, about all I lost when I lost Chatham, what would I have given, if I had anything to give, to be sent back to any other school, to learn something anywhere!" He was already in another school, although he wasn’t aware of it. The self-education he was forced into was teaching him, without him realizing it yet, what he really needed to know for the future ahead of him.[37]
That he took, from the very beginning of this Bayham-Street life, his first impression of that struggling poverty which is nowhere more vividly shown than in the commoner streets of the ordinary London suburb, and which enriched his earliest writings with a freshness of original humor and quite unstudied pathos that gave them much of their sudden popularity, there cannot be a doubt. "I certainly understood it," he has often said to me, "quite as well then as I do now." But he was not conscious yet that he did so understand it, or of the influence it was exerting on his life even then. It seems almost too much to assert of a child, say at nine or ten years old, that his observation of everything was as close and good, or that he had as much intuitive understanding of the character and weaknesses of the grown-up people around him, as when the same keen and wonderful faculty had made him famous among men. But my experience of him led me to put implicit faith in the assertion he unvaryingly himself made, that he had never seen any cause to correct or change what in his boyhood was his own secret impression of anybody whom he had had, as a grown man, the opportunity of testing in later years.
From the very start of his life on Bayham Street, he got his first impression of the struggling poverty vividly depicted in the typical streets of an ordinary London suburb. This experience infused his early writings with a freshness of original humor and unforced pathos, which contributed to their sudden popularity. "I definitely understood it," he often told me, "just as well then as I do now." However, he wasn't aware at that moment that he understood it, nor the impact it was having on his life even back then. It's almost too much to claim that a child, say around nine or ten, observed everything as closely and accurately, or that he had as much instinctive understanding of the character and flaws of the adults around him as he did when his keen insights later made him famous. Yet, my experiences with him led me to fully trust his constant assertion that he never found reason to change or correct the impressions he formed in his childhood of anyone he later had the chance to evaluate as an adult.
How it came that, being what he was, he should now have fallen into the misery and neglect of the time about to be described, was a subject on which thoughts were frequently interchanged between us; and on one occasion he gave me a sketch of the character of his father, which, as I can here repeat it in the exact words employed by him, will be the best preface I can make to what I feel that I have no alternative but to tell. "I know my father to be as kind-hearted and generous a[38] man as ever lived in the world. Everything that I can remember of his conduct to his wife, or children, or friends, in sickness or affliction, is beyond all praise. By me, as a sick child, he has watched night and day, unweariedly and patiently, many nights and days. He never undertook any business, charge, or trust, that he did not zealously, conscientiously, punctually, honorably discharge. His industry has always been untiring. He was proud of me, in his way, and had a great admiration of the comic singing. But, in the ease of his temper, and the straitness of his means, he appeared to have utterly lost at this time the idea of educating me at all, and to have utterly put from him the notion that I had any claim upon him, in that regard, whatever. So I degenerated into cleaning his boots of a morning, and my own; and making myself useful in the work of the little house; and looking after my younger brothers and sisters (we were now six in all); and going on such poor errands as arose out of our poor way of living."
How it happened that, given who he was, he fell into the misery and neglect that I’m about to describe was something we often discussed. One time, he shared a detailed picture of his father's character with me, which I can repeat here in his exact words. It will serve as the best introduction to what I feel I must share. "I know my father to be as kind-hearted and generous a man as ever lived. Everything I can remember about how he treated his wife, children, or friends during times of sickness or hardship is truly commendable. As a sick child, he watched over me day and night, tirelessly and patiently, for many days and nights. He never took on any business, responsibility, or trust that he didn’t handle with zeal, integrity, punctuality, and honor. His hard work has always been relentless. He was proud of me in his own way and had great admiration for my comic singing. However, due to his temperament and tight finances, he seemed to have completely forgotten the idea of educating me, and he appeared to have dismissed the notion that I had any claim on him for that. So, I ended up cleaning his boots in the morning, as well as my own; helping out around the house; looking after my younger siblings (we were now six in total); and running whatever small errands came up due to our limited means."
The cousin by marriage of whom I have spoken, James Lamert, who had lately completed his education at Sandhurst and was waiting in hopes of a commission, lived now with the family in Bayham Street, and had not lost his taste for the stage, or his ingenuities in connection with it. Taking pity on the solitary lad, he made and painted a little theatre for him. It was the only fanciful reality of his present life; but it could not supply what he missed most sorely, the companionship of boys of his own age, with whom he might share in the advantages of school and contend for its prizes. His sister Fanny was at about this time elected as a[39] pupil to the Royal Academy of Music; and he has told me what a stab to his heart it was, thinking of his own disregarded condition, to see her go away to begin her education, amid the tearful good wishes of everybody in the house.
The cousin by marriage I mentioned, James Lamert, who had recently finished his education at Sandhurst and was waiting hopefully for a commission, was living with the family on Bayham Street. He hadn't lost his love for the theater or his talents related to it. Feeling sorry for the lonely boy, he built and painted a small theater for him. That was the only imaginative escape from his current life; however, it couldn't replace what he missed the most—the company of boys his own age with whom he could share the benefits of school and compete for its prizes. Around this time, his sister Fanny was selected as a[39] pupil at the Royal Academy of Music, and he told me how painful it was for him, considering his own ignored situation, to watch her leave to start her education while everyone in the house wished her well through tearful farewells.
Nevertheless, as time went on, his own education still unconsciously went on as well, under the sternest and most potent of teachers; and, neglected and miserable as he was, he managed gradually to transfer to London all the dreaminess and all the romance with which he had invested Chatham. There were then at the top of Bayham Street some almshouses, and were still when he revisited it with me nearly twenty-seven years ago; and to go to this spot, he told me, and look from it over the dust-heaps and dock-leaves and fields (no longer there when we saw it together) at the cupola of St. Paul's looming through the smoke, was a treat that served him for hours of vague reflection afterwards. To be taken out for a walk into the real town, especially if it were anywhere about Covent Garden or the Strand, perfectly entranced him with pleasure. But most of all he had a profound attraction of repulsion to St. Giles's. If he could only induce whomsoever took him out to take him through Seven-Dials, he was supremely happy. "Good Heaven!" he would exclaim, "what wild visions of prodigies of wickedness, want, and beggary arose in my mind out of that place!" He was all this time, the reader will remember, still subject to continual attacks of illness, and, by reason of them, a very small boy even for his age.
However, as time went on, his education was still ongoing, even if he didn't realize it, under the strictest and most powerful teachers; and despite feeling neglected and miserable, he slowly managed to bring to London all the daydreaming and romance he had associated with Chatham. There were some almshouses at the top of Bayham Street, and they were still there when he revisited it with me nearly twenty-seven years ago; and he told me that going to this spot and looking out over the dust heaps and the dock leaves and the fields (which were no longer there when we saw it together) at the dome of St. Paul's rising through the smoke was a pleasure that gave him hours of thought afterward. Being taken out for a walk in the real town, especially around Covent Garden or the Strand, filled him with joy. But above all, he felt a strong mix of attraction and repulsion toward St. Giles's. If he could get whoever was with him to take him through Seven Dials, he was incredibly happy. "Good heavens!" he would exclaim, "what wild visions of wickedness, want, and poverty came to my mind from that place!" All this time, as the reader will recall, he was still suffering from ongoing bouts of illness, and because of that, he was quite a small boy for his age.
That part of his boyhood is now very near of which, when the days of fame and prosperity came to him, he[40] felt the weight upon his memory as a painful burden until he could lighten it by sharing it with a friend; and an accident I will presently mention led him first to reveal it. There is, however, an interval of some months still to be described, of which, from conversations or letters that passed between us, after or because of this confidence, and that already have yielded fruit to these pages, I can supply some vague and desultory notices. The use thus made of them, it is due to myself to remark, was contemplated then; for though, long before his death, I had ceased to believe it likely that I should survive to write about him, he had never withdrawn the wish at this early time strongly expressed, or the confidences, not only then but to the very eve of his death reposed in me, that were to enable me to fulfill it.[4] The fulfillment indeed he had himself[41] rendered more easy by partially uplifting the veil in David Copperfield.
That part of his childhood is now very close, and when he achieved fame and success, he felt the weight of those memories as a painful burden until he could ease it by sharing with a friend; an incident I will mention shortly led him to reveal it. However, there are still several months to describe, which I can provide some vague and scattered details about from conversations or letters exchanged between us, after or due to this trust, which have already contributed to these pages. I should note that my use of them was intended at the time; because, long before his death, I had stopped believing it was likely that I would live long enough to write about him, he never took back the wish he had expressed early on or the confidences he shared with me, not only then but up until the very eve of his death, which enabled me to fulfill it. The fulfillment, in fact, he had made easier by partially lifting the veil in David Copperfield.
The visits made from Bayham Street were chiefly to two connections of the family, his mother's elder brother and his godfather. The latter, who was a rigger, and mast-, oar-, and block-maker, lived at Limehouse in a substantial handsome sort of way, and was kind to his godchild. It was always a great treat to him to go to Mr. Huffham's; and the London night-sights as he returned were a perpetual joy and marvel. Here, too, the comic-singing accomplishment was brought into play so greatly to the admiration of one of the godfather's guests, an honest boat-builder, that he pronounced the little lad to be a "progidy." The visits to the uncle who was at this time fellow-clerk with his father, in Somerset House, were nearer home. Mr. Thomas Barrow, the eldest of his mother's family, had broken his leg in a fall; and, while laid up with this illness, his lodging was in Gerrard Street, Soho, in the upper part of the house of a worthy gentleman then recently deceased, a bookseller named Manson, father to the partner in the celebrated firm of Christie & Manson, whose widow at this time carried on the business. Attracted by the look of the lad as he went up-stairs, these good people lent him books to amuse him; among them Miss Porter's Scottish Chiefs, Holbein's Dance of Death, and George Colman's Broad Grins. The latter seized his fancy very much; and he was so impressed by its description of Covent Garden, in the[42] piece called "The Elder Brother," that he stole down to the market by himself to compare it with the book. He remembered, as he said in telling me this, snuffing up the flavor of the faded cabbage-leaves as if it were the very breath of comic fiction. Nor was he far wrong, as comic fiction then and for some time after was. It was reserved for himself to give sweeter and fresher breath to it. Many years were to pass first, but he was beginning already to make the trial.
The visits from Bayham Street were mostly to two family connections: his mother’s older brother and his godfather. The latter, who was a rigger and made masts, oars, and blocks, lived in Limehouse in a nice, substantial way and was kind to his godchild. Going to Mr. Huffham's was always a big treat for him, and the sights of London at night on the way back were a constant joy and wonder. Here, he would also show off his comic singing, which impressed one of his godfather's guests, a hardworking boat-builder, so much that he called the little boy a "prodigy." The visits to his uncle, who was at that time a fellow clerk with his father at Somerset House, were closer to home. Mr. Thomas Barrow, the oldest of his mother's family, had broken his leg in a fall, and while he was recovering, he was living on Gerrard Street in Soho, in the upper part of the house of a decent gentleman who had recently passed away, a bookseller named Manson, who was the father of a partner in the well-known firm of Christie & Manson, which at that time was run by his widow. Drawn to the sight of the boy going upstairs, these kind people lent him books to keep him entertained; among them were Miss Porter's Scottish Chiefs, Holbein's Dance of Death, and George Colman's Broad Grins. The latter really captured his imagination, and he was so moved by its depiction of Covent Garden in the piece called "The Elder Brother" that he snuck out to the market by himself to see it for real. He remembered, as he told me this, that he could smell the stench of the wilted cabbage leaves as if it were the very essence of comic fiction. And he wasn't far off, as comic fiction was like that then and for quite a while after. It was meant for him to give it a sweeter, fresher breath. Many years would pass first, but he was already starting to try.
His uncle was shaved by a very odd old barber out of Dean Street, Soho, who was never tired of reviewing the events of the last war, and especially of detecting Napoleon's mistakes, and rearranging his whole life for him on a plan of his own. The boy wrote a description of this old barber, but never had courage to show it. At about the same time, taking for his model the description of the canon's housekeeper in Gil Blas, he sketched a deaf old woman who waited on them in Bayham Street, and who made delicate hashes with walnut-ketchup. As little did he dare to show this, either; though he thought it, himself, extremely clever.
His uncle was shaved by a very strange old barber from Dean Street, Soho, who never tired of talking about the events of the last war, especially pointing out Napoleon's mistakes and redesigning his entire life according to his own ideas. The boy wrote a description of this old barber but never had the nerve to show it. Around the same time, inspired by the description of the canon's housekeeper in Gil Blas, he sketched a deaf old woman who served them in Bayham Street, known for making delicate hashes with walnut ketchup. He also didn’t dare to show this, although he thought it was extremely clever.
In Bayham Street, meanwhile, affairs were going on badly; the poor boy's visits to his uncle, while the latter was still kept a prisoner by his accident, were interrupted by another attack of fever; and on his recovery the mysterious "deed" had again come uppermost. His father's resources were so low, and all his expedients so thoroughly exhausted, that trial was to be made whether his mother might not come to the rescue. The time was arrived for her to exert herself, she said; and she "must do something." The godfather[43] down at Limehouse was reported to have an Indian connection. People in the East Indies always sent their children home to be educated. She would set up a school. They would all grow rich by it. And then, thought the sick boy, "perhaps even I might go to school myself."
In Bayham Street, things were going poorly; the poor boy’s visits to his uncle, who was still recovering from his accident, were interrupted by another bout of fever. When he got better, the mysterious "deed" came back into focus. His father's resources were running low, and all his attempts had been exhausted, so they were going to see if his mother could help. She said it was time for her to step up and that she "must do something." The godfather down in Limehouse was said to have connections in India. People in the East Indies always sent their kids back home for their education. She would start a school. They would all get rich from it. And then, thought the sick boy, "maybe even I could go to school myself."
A house was soon found at number four, Gower Street north; a large brass plate on the door announced Mrs. Dickens's Establishment; and the result I can give in the exact words of the then small actor in the comedy, whose hopes it had raised so high: "I left, at a great many other doors, a great many circulars calling attention to the merits of the establishment. Yet nobody ever came to school, nor do I recollect that anybody ever proposed to come, or that the least preparation was made to receive anybody. But I know that we got on very badly with the butcher and baker; that very often we had not too much for dinner; and that at last my father was arrested." The interval between the sponging-house and the prison was passed by the sorrowful lad in running errands and carrying messages for the prisoner, delivered with swollen eyes and through shining tears; and the last words said to him by his father before he was finally carried to the Marshalsea were to the effect that the sun was set upon him forever. "I really believed at the time," said Dickens to me, "that they had broken my heart." He took afterwards ample revenge for this false alarm by making all the world laugh at them in David Copperfield.
A house was quickly found at number four, Gower Street North; a large brass plate on the door announced Mrs. Dickens's Place; and I can give the outcome in the exact words of the young actor in the comedy, whose hopes were raised so high: "I left, at a lot of other doors, a lot of circulars highlighting the benefits of the establishment. Yet nobody ever came to school, nor do I remember anyone ever suggesting they would come, or that any preparation was made to welcome anyone. But I know we had a rough time with the butcher and baker; there were many times we didn’t have enough for dinner; and eventually my father was arrested." The time between the sponging-house and the prison was spent by the sad boy running errands and delivering messages for the prisoner, with swollen eyes and through streaming tears; and the last words his father said to him before he was taken to the Marshalsea were that the sun had set on him forever. "I really believed at the time," Dickens told me, "that they had broken my heart." He later took ample revenge for this false alarm by making the whole world laugh at them in David Copperfield.
The readers of Mr. Micawber's history who remember David's first visit to the Marshalsea prison, and how upon seeing the turnkey he recalled the turnkey in the[44] blanket in Roderick Random, will read with curious interest what follows, written as a personal experience of fact two or three years before the fiction had even entered into his thoughts:
The readers of Mr. Micawber's story who remember David's first trip to the Marshalsea prison, and how seeing the jailer brought to mind the jailer in the [44] blanket in Roderick Random, will read with curious interest what comes next, written as a personal experience that happened two or three years before those fictional thoughts had even crossed his mind:
"My father was waiting for me in the lodge, and we went up to his room (on the top story but one), and cried very much. And he told me, I remember, to take warning by the Marshalsea, and to observe that if a man had twenty pounds a year and spent nineteen pounds nineteen shillings and sixpence, he would be happy; but that a shilling spent the other way would make him wretched. I see the fire we sat before, now; with two bricks inside the rusted grate, one on each side, to prevent its burning too many coals. Some other debtor shared the room with him, who came in by-and-by; and, as the dinner was a joint-stock repast, I was sent up to 'Captain Porter' in the room overhead, with Mr. Dickens's compliments, and I was his son, and could he, Captain P., lend me a knife and fork?
"My dad was waiting for me in the lodge, and we headed up to his room (one floor below the top) and cried a lot. He told me, I remember, to take a lesson from the Marshalsea and to understand that if a man had twenty pounds a year and spent nineteen pounds, nineteen shillings, and sixpence, he would be happy; but spending just one shilling the other way would make him miserable. I can still picture the fire we sat in front of, with two bricks inside the rusty grate, one on each side, to keep it from burning too many coals. Another debtor shared the room with him, who came in after a while; and since dinner was a shared meal, I was sent up to 'Captain Porter' in the room above, with Mr. Dickens's compliments, and I was his son, and could he, Captain P., lend me a knife and fork?"
"Captain Porter lent the knife and fork, with his compliments in return. There was a very dirty lady in his little room; and two wan girls, his daughters, with shock heads of hair. I thought I should not have liked to borrow Captain Porter's comb. The captain himself was in the last extremity of shabbiness; and if I could draw at all, I would draw an accurate portrait of the old, old, brown great-coat he wore, with no other coat below it. His whiskers were large. I saw his bed rolled up in a corner; and what plates, and dishes, and pots he had, on a shelf; and I knew (God knows how) that the two girls with the shock heads were Captain Porter's natural children, and that the dirty lady was not married[45] to Captain P. My timid, wondering station on his threshold was not occupied more than a couple of minutes, I dare say; but I came down again to the room below with all this as surely in my knowledge as the knife and fork were in my hand."
"Captain Porter lent the knife and fork, along with his compliments in return. There was a very dirty woman in his small room, and two pale girls, his daughters, with messy hair. I thought I wouldn’t want to borrow Captain Porter’s comb. The captain himself looked extremely shabby; if I could draw at all, I would create an accurate portrait of the old brown overcoat he wore, with nothing else underneath. His whiskers were large. I noticed his bed rolled up in a corner, and what plates, dishes, and pots he had on a shelf. I knew (God knows how) that the two girls with messy hair were Captain Porter’s biological children and that the dirty woman was not married to Captain P. My timid, curious position on his threshold didn’t last more than a couple of minutes, I’d say; but I went down to the room below with all this information firmly in my mind, just like the knife and fork were in my hand."
How there was something agreeable and gipsy-like in the dinner after all, and how he took back the captain's knife and fork early in the afternoon, and how he went home to comfort his mother with an account of his visit, David Copperfield has also accurately told. Then, at home, came many miserable daily struggles that seemed to last an immense time, yet did not perhaps cover many weeks. Almost everything by degrees was sold or pawned, little Charles being the principal agent in those sorrowful transactions. Such of the books as had been brought from Chatham—Peregrine Pickle, Roderick Random, Tom Jones, Humphrey Clinker, and all the rest—went first. They were carried off from the little chiffonier, which his father called the library, to a bookseller in the Hampstead Road, the same that David Copperfield describes as in the City Road; and the account of the sales, as they actually occurred and were told to me long before David was born, was reproduced word for word in his imaginary narrative: "The keeper of this bookstall, who lived in a little house behind it, used to get tipsy every night, and to be violently scolded by his wife every morning. More than once, when I went there early, I had audience of him in a turn-up bedstead, with a cut in his forehead or a black eye bearing witness to his excesses overnight (I am afraid he was quarrelsome in his drink); and he, with a shaking hand, endeavoring to find the needful shillings[46] in one or other of the pockets of his clothes, which lay upon the floor, while his wife, with a baby in her arms and her shoes down at heel, never left off rating him. Sometimes he had lost his money, and then he would ask me to call again; but his wife had always got some (had taken his, I dare say, while he was drunk), and secretly completed the bargain on the stairs, as we went down together."
How there was something pleasant and free-spirited about the dinner after all, and how he took back the captain's knife and fork early in the afternoon, and how he went home to comfort his mother with a story about his visit, David Copperfield has also told accurately. Then, at home, there were many miserable daily struggles that felt like they lasted a long time, though they might not have stretched over many weeks. Almost everything gradually got sold or pawned, with little Charles playing the main role in those sad transactions. The books that had come from Chatham—Peregrine Pickle, Roderick Random, Tom Jones, Humphrey Clinker, and the rest—went first. They were taken from the small chiffonier, which his father called the library, to a bookseller on the Hampstead Road, the same one that David Copperfield mentions as being on the City Road; and the account of the sales, just as they happened and were told to me long before David was born, was repeated word for word in his fictional narrative: “The owner of this bookstall, who lived in a little house behind it, used to get drunk every night and be harshly scolded by his wife every morning. More than once, when I visited early, I found him in a pull-out bed, sporting a cut on his forehead or a black eye as proof of his drinking excesses (I’m afraid he was aggressive when drunk); and he, with a trembling hand, trying to find the needed coins[46] in one of the pockets of his clothes, which were strewn on the floor, while his wife, holding a baby in her arms with worn-out shoes, never stopped berating him. Sometimes he would have lost his money, and then he would ask me to come back; but his wife always had some (probably took it from him while he was drunk), and secretly completed the deal on the stairs as we walked down together.”
The same pawnbroker's shop, too, which was so well known to David, became not less familiar to Charles; and a good deal of notice was here taken of him by the pawnbroker, or by his principal clerk who officiated behind the counter, and who, while making out the duplicate, liked of all things to hear the lad conjugate a Latin verb and translate or decline his musa and dominus. Everything to this accompaniment went gradually; until, at last, even of the furniture of Gower Street number four there was nothing left except a few chairs, a kitchen table, and some beds. Then they encamped, as it were, in the two parlors of the emptied house, and lived there night and day.
The same pawnbroker's shop, which David knew so well, became just as familiar to Charles; and the pawnbroker, or his main clerk who worked behind the counter, paid a lot of attention to him. The clerk especially enjoyed hearing the boy conjugate a Latin verb and translate or decline his musa and dominus while making out the duplicate. Everything moved along slowly until, finally, there was nothing left in the furniture of number four Gower Street except a few chairs, a kitchen table, and some beds. Then they set up camp, so to speak, in the two parlors of the empty house, living there day and night.
All which is but the prelude to what remains to be described.
All of this is just the introduction to what still needs to be described.
CHAPTER II.
HARD EXPERIENCES IN BOYHOOD.
1822-1824.
The incidents to be told now would probably never have been known to me, or indeed any of the occurrences of his childhood and youth, but for the accident of a question which I put to him one day in the March or April of 1847.
The incidents I'm about to share would likely have remained unknown to me, along with all the events from his childhood and early years, if it weren't for a question I asked him one day in March or April of 1847.
I asked if he remembered ever having seen in his boyhood our friend the elder Mr. Dilke, his father's acquaintance and contemporary, who had been a clerk in the same office in Somerset House to which Mr. John Dickens belonged. Yes, he said, he recollected[48] seeing him at a house in Gerrard Street, where his uncle Barrow lodged during an illness, and Mr. Dilke had visited him. Never at any other time. Upon which I told him that some one else had been intended in the mention made to me, for that the reference implied not merely his being met accidentally, but his having had some juvenile employment in a warehouse near the Strand; at which place Mr. Dilke, being with the elder Dickens one day, had noticed him, and received, in return for the gift of a half-crown, a very low bow. He was silent for several minutes; I felt that I had unintentionally touched a painful place in his memory; and to Mr. Dilke I never spoke of the subject again. It was not, however, then, but some weeks later, that Dickens made further allusion to my thus having struck unconsciously upon a time of which he never could lose the remembrance while he remembered anything, and the recollection of which, at intervals, haunted him and made him miserable, even to that hour.
I asked if he remembered ever having seen our friend the older Mr. Dilke from his childhood, who was a friend of his father and worked in the same office at Somerset House where Mr. John Dickens was employed. Yes, he said, he remembered seeing him at a house on Gerrard Street, where his uncle Barrow stayed during an illness, and Mr. Dilke had come to visit him. But he hadn’t seen him at any other time. I then told him that someone else had been meant in the reference I was given because it wasn't just about meeting him by chance; it involved having some early job in a warehouse near the Strand. At that location, Mr. Dilke, who was with the older Dickens one day, had noticed him and received a very low bow in exchange for a half-crown. He was quiet for several minutes; I sensed that I had unintentionally brought up a painful reminder from his past, and I never mentioned the subject of Mr. Dilke again. However, it wasn't until a few weeks later that Dickens made another reference to how I had unknowingly touched upon a time that he could never forget as long as he had any memory. The recollection haunted him at times and made him miserable, even to that day.
Very shortly afterwards I learnt in all their detail the incidents that had been so painful to him, and what then was said to me or written respecting them revealed the story of his boyhood. The idea of David Copperfield, which was to take all the world into his confidence, had not at this time occurred to him; but what it had so startled me to know, his readers were afterwards told with only such change or addition as for the time might sufficiently disguise himself under cover of his hero. For the poor little lad, with good ability and a most sensitive nature, turned at the age of ten into a "laboring hind" in the service of "Murdstone[49] and Grinby," and conscious already of what made it seem very strange to him that he could so easily have been thrown away at such an age, was indeed himself. His was the secret agony of soul at finding himself "companion to Mick Walker and Mealy Potatoes," and his the tears that mingled with the water in which he and they rinsed and washed out bottles. It had all been written, as fact, before he thought of any other use for it; and it was not until several months later, when the fancy of David Copperfield, itself suggested by what he had so written of his early troubles, began to take shape in his mind, that he abandoned his first intention of writing his own life. Those warehouse experiences fell then so aptly into the subject he had chosen, that he could not resist the temptation of immediately using them; and the manuscript recording them, which was but the first portion of what he had designed to write, was embodied in the substance of the eleventh and earlier chapters of his novel. What already had been sent to me, however, and proof-sheets of the novel interlined at the time, enable me now to separate the fact from the fiction, and to supply to the story of the author's childhood those passages, omitted from the book, which, apart from their illustration of the growth of his character, present to us a picture of tragical suffering, and of tender as well as humorous fancy, unsurpassed in even the wonders of his published writings.
Very soon after, I learned all the details of the incidents that had caused him so much pain, and what was said to me or written about them revealed his childhood story. The idea of David Copperfield, meant to share everything with the world, hadn’t crossed his mind yet; but what startled me to know was later told to his readers with only enough changes or additions to hide himself behind his hero. The poor little boy, who was smart and extremely sensitive, turned into a "laboring hind" at the age of ten working for "Murdstone[49] and Grinby," and he was already aware of what made it feel so strange to him that he could have been cast aside so easily at such a young age. He experienced the secret agony of feeling like he was "friends with Mick Walker and Mealy Potatoes," and shed tears that mixed with the water in which he and they rinsed and cleaned out bottles. It had all been written down as fact before he thought of any other purpose for it; and it wasn’t until several months later, when the concept of David Copperfield, itself inspired by what he had written about his early struggles, began to take shape in his mind, that he changed his mind about writing his own life story. Those warehouse experiences fit so perfectly into his chosen subject that he couldn’t resist the urge to use them right away; and the manuscript documenting them, which was just the first part of what he had planned to write, became part of the eleventh and earlier chapters of his novel. However, what had already been sent to me, along with proof-sheets of the novel marked up at the time, allows me now to separate fact from fiction and to add to the author’s childhood story the parts that were left out of the book, which, aside from illustrating his character's development, present an image of tragic suffering, along with tender and humorous imagination, unmatched even by the wonders of his published works.
The person indirectly responsible for the scenes to be described was the young relative James Lamert, the cousin by his aunt's marriage of whom I have made frequent mention, who got up the plays at Chatham, and[50] after passing at Sandhurst had been living with the family in Bayham Street in the hope of obtaining a commission in the army. This did not come until long afterwards, when, in consideration of his father's services, he received it, and relinquished it then in favor of a younger brother; but he had meanwhile, before the family removed from Camden-town, ceased to live with them. The husband of a sister of his (of the same name as himself, being indeed his cousin, George Lamert), a man of some property, had recently embarked in an odd sort of commercial speculation, and had taken him into his office and his house, to assist in it. I give now the fragment of the autobiography of Dickens:
The person indirectly responsible for the scenes to be described was the young relative James Lamert, the cousin from his aunt's marriage that I’ve mentioned often, who organized the plays at Chatham, and[50] after getting through Sandhurst had been living with the family on Bayham Street, hoping to get a commission in the army. This didn’t happen until much later, when, due to his father's service, he finally received one but then turned it down in favor of a younger brother; however, he had already stopped living with the family before they moved from Camden Town. The husband of one of his sisters (sharing his name and also his cousin, George Lamert), a man with some wealth, had recently started a strange kind of business venture and brought him into his office and home to help out. I now present a fragment of Dickens' autobiography:
"This speculation was a rivalry of 'Warren's Blacking, 30, Strand,'—at that time very famous. One Jonathan Warren (the famous one was Robert), living at 30, Hungerford Stairs, or Market, Strand (for I forget which it was called then), claimed to have been the original inventor or proprietor of the blacking-recipe, and to have been deposed and ill used by his renowned relation. At last he put himself in the way of selling his recipe, and his name, and his 30, Hungerford Stairs, Strand (30, Strand, very large, and the intermediate direction very small), for an annuity; and he set forth by his agents that a little capital would make a great business of it. The man of some property was found in George Lamert, the cousin and brother-in-law of James. He bought this right and title, and went into the blacking-business and the blacking-premises.
"This speculation was a competition with 'Warren's Blacking, 30, Strand,' which was quite famous at that time. One Jonathan Warren (the well-known one was Robert), who lived at 30, Hungerford Stairs or Market, Strand (I can’t remember which it was called back then), claimed to be the original inventor or owner of the blacking recipe, and that he had been ousted and mistreated by his famous relative. Eventually, he decided to sell his recipe, his name, and his location at 30, Hungerford Stairs, Strand (30, Strand was very large, and the middle address very small), for an annuity; and he had his agents assert that a small investment could turn it into a big business. A man with some wealth named George Lamert, who was the cousin and brother-in-law of James, was found. He purchased this right and title, and got into the blacking business and the blacking facilities."
"—In an evil hour for me, as I often bitterly thought. Its chief manager, James Lamert, the relative who had[51] lived with us in Bayham Street, seeing how I was employed from day to day, and knowing what our domestic circumstances then were, proposed that I should go into the blacking-warehouse, to be as useful as I could, at a salary, I think, of six shillings a week. I am not clear whether it was six or seven. I am inclined to believe, from my uncertainty on this head, that it was six at first, and seven afterwards. At any rate, the offer was accepted very willingly by my father and mother, and on a Monday morning I went down to the blacking-warehouse to begin my business life.
"—At a really unfortunate time for me, as I often thought bitterly. The main manager, James Lamert, who was related to us and had lived with us in Bayham Street, noticed how I was spending my days and understood our home situation. He suggested that I work in the blacking-warehouse, doing whatever I could to help out, for a salary of, I believe, six shillings a week. I'm not sure if it was six or seven. I tend to think, given my uncertainty about this, that it started as six and then went to seven later. Either way, my father and mother readily accepted the offer, and on a Monday morning, I went down to the blacking-warehouse to start my working life."
"It is wonderful to me how I could have been so easily cast away at such an age. It is wonderful to me that, even after my descent into the poor little drudge I had been since we came to London, no one had compassion enough on me—a child of singular abilities, quick, eager, delicate, and soon hurt, bodily or mentally—to suggest that something might have been spared, as certainly it might have been, to place me at any common school. Our friends, I take it, were tired out. No one made any sign. My father and mother were quite satisfied. They could hardly have been more so if I had been twenty years of age, distinguished at a grammar-school, and going to Cambridge.
"It's amazing to me how easily I could have been discarded at such a young age. It's surprising that, even after I had become the poor little worker I was since we moved to London, no one had enough compassion for me—a child with unique talents, quick, eager, delicate, and easily hurt, both physically and emotionally—to suggest that something could have been done to enroll me in any regular school. I guess our friends were just worn out. No one gave any hint. My parents were completely satisfied. They couldn't have been happier if I had been twenty years old, excelling at a grammar school, and headed to Cambridge."
"The blacking-warehouse was the last house on the left-hand side of the way, at old Hungerford Stairs. It was a crazy, tumble-down old house, abutting of course on the river, and literally overrun with rats. Its wainscoted rooms, and its rotten floors and staircase, and the old gray rats swarming down in the cellars, and the sound of their squeaking and scuffling coming up the stairs at all times, and the dirt and decay of the place,[52] rise up visibly before me, as if I were there again. The counting-house was on the first floor, looking over the coal-barges and the river. There was a recess in it, in which I was to sit and work. My work was to cover the pots of paste-blacking; first with a piece of oil-paper, and then with a piece of blue paper; to tie them round with a string; and then to clip the paper close and neat, all round, until it looked as smart as a pot of ointment from an apothecary's shop. When a certain number of grosses of pots had attained this pitch of perfection, I was to paste on each a printed label, and then go on again with more pots. Two or three other boys were kept at similar duty down-stairs on similar wages. One of them came up, in a ragged apron and a paper cap, on the first Monday morning, to show me the trick of using the string and tying the knot. His name was Bob Fagin; and I took the liberty of using his name, long afterwards, in Oliver Twist.
The blacking warehouse was the last building on the left side of the road, at the old Hungerford Stairs. It was a dilapidated, rundown building, right by the river, and literally infested with rats. Its paneled rooms, decaying floors and stairs, the old gray rats swarming in the cellars, the sounds of their squeaking and scurrying echoing up the stairs at all hours, and the filth and decay of the place[52] come vividly to mind, as if I were there again. The counting room was on the first floor, overlooking the coal barges and the river. There was a nook in it where I was supposed to sit and work. My job was to cover the pots of paste blacking; first with a piece of oil paper, then with a piece of blue paper; tie them with string; and then trim the paper neatly all around so it looked as presentable as a pot of ointment from a pharmacy. Once a certain number of gross of pots had reached this level of perfection, I had to stick a printed label on each one and then continue with more pots. Two or three other boys were doing similar tasks downstairs for similar pay. One of them came up, wearing a ragged apron and a paper cap, on the first Monday morning to show me how to use the string and tie the knot. His name was Bob Fagin, and I later took the liberty of using his name in Oliver Twist.
"Our relative had kindly arranged to teach me something in the dinner-hour; from twelve to one, I think it was; every day. But an arrangement so incompatible with counting-house business soon died away, from no fault of his or mine; and, for the same reason, my small work-table, and my grosses of pots, my papers, string, scissors, paste-pot, and labels, by little and little, vanished out of the recess in the counting-house, and kept company with the other small work-tables, grosses of pots, papers, string, scissors, and paste-pots, down-stairs. It was not long before Bob Fagin and I, and another boy whose name was Paul Green, but who was currently believed to have been christened Poll (a belief which I transferred, long afterwards[53] again, to Mr. Sweedlepipe, in Martin Chuzzlewit), worked generally, side by side. Bob Fagin was an orphan, and lived with his brother-in-law, a waterman. Poll Green's father had the additional distinction of being a fireman, and was employed at Drury Lane theatre; where another relation of Poll's, I think his little sister, did imps in the pantomimes.
Our relative had kindly arranged to teach me something during dinner hour; it was from twelve to one, I think, every day. But an arrangement that didn't fit well with the office work quickly fell apart, not due to any fault of his or mine; and for the same reason, my small work-table, my stock of pots, papers, string, scissors, paste, and labels gradually disappeared from the corner of the office and joined the other small work-tables, pots, papers, string, scissors, and paste downstairs. Before long, Bob Fagin and I, along with another boy named Paul Green—though everyone believed he was actually named Poll (a belief I later transferred to Mr. Sweedlepipe in Martin Chuzzlewit)—were often working side by side. Bob Fagin was an orphan and lived with his brother-in-law, who was a waterman. Poll Green's dad had the additional distinction of being a fireman and worked at Drury Lane theatre, where another relative of Poll's, I think his little sister, performed in the pantomimes.
"No words can express the secret agony of my soul as I sunk into this companionship; compared these every-day associates with those of my happier childhood; and felt my early hopes of growing up to be a learned and distinguished man, crushed in my breast. The deep remembrance of the sense I had of being utterly neglected and hopeless; of the shame I felt in my position; of the misery it was to my young heart to believe that, day by day, what I had learned, and thought, and delighted in, and raised my fancy and my emulation up by, was passing away from me, never to be brought back any more; cannot be written. My whole nature was so penetrated with the grief and humiliation of such considerations, that even now, famous and caressed and happy, I often forget in my dreams that I have a dear wife and children; even that I am a man; and wander desolately back to that time of my life.
"No words can capture the secret pain of my soul as I fell into this friendship; comparing these everyday companions to those from my happier childhood; and feeling my early dreams of becoming a learned and distinguished man crushed inside me. The deep memory of feeling completely neglected and hopeless; the shame I felt in my situation; the misery it brought to my young heart to believe that, day by day, everything I had learned, thought about, delighted in, and aspired to was slipping away from me, never to return, is beyond expression. My whole being was so filled with the grief and humiliation of these thoughts that even now, famous, admired, and happy, I often forget in my dreams that I have a loving wife and children; even that I'm a man; and I wander back desolately to that time in my life."
"My mother and my brothers and sisters (excepting Fanny in the Royal Academy of Music) were still encamped, with a young servant-girl from Chatham workhouse, in the two parlors in the emptied house in Gower Street north. It was a long way to go and return within the dinner-hour, and usually I either carried my dinner with me, or went and bought it at some neighboring[54] shop. In the latter case, it was commonly a saveloy and a penny loaf; sometimes, a fourpenny plate of beef from a cook's shop; sometimes, a plate of bread and cheese, and a glass of beer, from a miserable old public-house over the way: the Swan, if I remember right, or the Swan and something else that I have forgotten. Once, I remember tucking my own bread (which I had brought from home in the morning) under my arm, wrapped up in a piece of paper like a book, and going into the best dining-room in Johnson's alamode beef-house in Clare Court, Drury Lane, and magnificently ordering a small plate of alamode beef to eat with it. What the waiter thought of such a strange little apparition, coming in all alone, I don't know; but I can see him now, staring at me as I ate my dinner, and bringing up the other waiter to look. I gave him a halfpenny, and I wish, now, that he hadn't taken it."
"My mom and my siblings (except for Fanny at the Royal Academy of Music) were still living in the two parlors of the empty house on Gower Street North, along with a young servant girl from the Chatham workhouse. It was quite a trek to go there and back within the dinner hour, so I usually either brought my lunch with me or bought it at a nearby shop. When I bought my meal, it was usually a saveloy and a penny loaf; sometimes it was a fourpenny plate of beef from a takeout place; other times I’d get a plate of bread and cheese, along with a glass of beer, from a rundown old pub across the street: the Swan, if I remember correctly, or maybe the Swan and something else I can't recall. Once, I remember tucking my own bread (which I had brought from home that morning) under my arm, wrapped in a piece of paper like a book, and walking into the best dining room at Johnson's alamode beef-house in Clare Court, Drury Lane, and boldly ordering a small plate of alamode beef to go with it. I don’t know what the waiter thought of such a strange little sight, strolling in all alone, but I can picture him now, staring at me while I ate and bringing the other waiter over to take a look. I gave him a halfpenny, and I wish now that he hadn’t accepted it."
I lose here for a little while the fragment of direct narrative, but I perfectly recollect that he used to describe Saturday night as his great treat. It was a grand thing to walk home with six shillings in his pocket, and to look in at the shop-windows and think what it would buy. Hunt's roasted corn, as a British and patriotic substitute for coffee, was in great vogue just then; and the little fellow used to buy it, and roast it on the Sunday. There was a cheap periodical of selected pieces called the Portfolio, which he had also a great fancy for taking home with him. The new proposed "deed," meanwhile, had failed to propitiate his father's creditors; all hope of arrangement passed away; and the end was that his mother and her encampment in Gower Street north broke up and went to live in the[55] Marshalsea. I am able at this point to resume his own account:
I lose the direct narrative here for a bit, but I clearly remember that he used to talk about Saturday night as his favorite treat. It felt great to walk home with six shillings in his pocket, looking at shop windows and imagining what he could buy. Hunt's roasted corn, a British and patriotic alternative to coffee, was really popular at that time; he would buy it and roast it on Sundays. There was also a budget magazine of selected pieces called the Portfolio that he really liked to take home with him. Meanwhile, the newly proposed "deed" didn’t manage to win over his father's creditors; all hope for a resolution faded away, and ultimately, his mother and her camp in Gower Street North broke up and moved to the [55] Marshalsea. I can now pick up his account again:
"The key of the house was sent back to the landlord, who was very glad to get it; and I (small Cain that I was, except that I had never done harm to any one) was handed over as a lodger to a reduced old lady, long known to our family, in Little College Street, Camden-town, who took children in to board, and had once done so at Brighton; and who, with a few alterations and embellishments, unconsciously began to sit for Mrs. Pipchin in Dombey when she took in me.
"The key to the house was returned to the landlord, who was very happy to receive it; and I (little Cain that I was, except that I had never harmed anyone) was placed as a lodger with an elderly lady, who had been known to our family for a long time, in Little College Street, Camden Town. She took in children as boarders and had previously done so in Brighton; and, with a few changes and decorations, she unknowingly started to serve as the inspiration for Mrs. Pipchin in Dombey when she took me in."
"She had a little brother and sister under her care then; somebody's natural children, who were very irregularly paid for; and a widow's little son. The two boys and I slept in the same room. My own exclusive breakfast, of a penny cottage loaf and a penny-worth of milk, I provided for myself. I kept another small loaf, and a quarter of a pound of cheese, on a particular shelf of a particular cupboard; to make my supper on when I came back at night. They made a hole in the six or seven shillings, I know well; and I was out at the blacking-warehouse all day, and had to support myself upon that money all the week. I suppose my lodging was paid for, by my father. I certainly did not pay it myself; and I certainly had no other assistance whatever (the making of my clothes, I think, excepted), from Monday morning until Saturday night. No advice, no counsel, no encouragement, no consolation, no support, from any one that I can call to mind, so help me God.
She had a little brother and sister to take care of, who were someone else's kids that were paid for pretty irregularly, and a widow's young son. The two boys and I shared a room. I took care of my own breakfast with a penny cottage loaf and a penny's worth of milk. I kept another small loaf and a quarter pound of cheese on a specific shelf in a specific cupboard to make my dinner when I got back at night. I know they took a chunk out of the six or seven shillings; I spent all day at the blacking warehouse, and I had to live off that money for the whole week. I think my dad paid for my lodging. I definitely didn't pay for it myself, and I sure didn’t get any other help (except maybe for making my clothes) from Monday morning to Saturday night. No advice, no guidance, no motivation, no comfort, no support from anyone I can remember, I swear.
"Sundays, Fanny and I passed in the prison. I was at the academy in Tenterden Street, Hanover Square,[56] at nine o'clock in the morning, to fetch her; and we walked back there together, at night.
Sundays, Fanny and I spent in the prison. I was at the academy on Tenterden Street, Hanover Square,[56] at nine in the morning to pick her up; and we walked back there together at night.
"I was so young and childish, and so little qualified—how could I be otherwise?—to undertake the whole charge of my own existence, that, in going to Hungerford Stairs of a morning, I could not resist the stale pastry put out at half-price on trays at the confectioners' doors in Tottenham Court Road; and I often spent in that the money I should have kept for my dinner. Then I went without my dinner, or bought a roll, or a slice of pudding. There were two pudding-shops between which I was divided, according to my finances. One was in a court close to St. Martin's Church (at the back of the church) which is now removed altogether. The pudding at that shop was made with currants, and was rather a special pudding, but was dear: two penn'orth not being larger than a penn'orth of more ordinary pudding. A good shop for the latter was in the Strand, somewhere near where the Lowther Arcade is now. It was a stout, hale pudding, heavy and flabby; with great raisins in it, stuck in whole, at great distances apart. It came up hot, at about noon every day; and many and many a day did I dine off it.
I was really young and immature, and not at all ready—how could I be?—to take on the responsibility of my own life. So, every morning when I headed to Hungerford Stairs, I couldn't resist the stale pastries sold at half-price on trays outside the confectioners' on Tottenham Court Road; I often spent the money I had intended for my dinner on them instead. That meant I would either go without dinner or buy a roll, or maybe a slice of pudding. There were two pudding shops I liked to choose between, depending on how much money I had. One was in a little court behind St. Martin's Church (which isn't there anymore). The pudding at that shop was made with currants and was pretty special, but it was expensive: two pennies for a portion that was no bigger than a penny's worth of regular pudding. The other shop, which sold more ordinary pudding, was in the Strand, somewhere near where the Lowther Arcade is now. It had a thick, hearty pudding that was heavy and soft, with big raisins stuck in it, spaced far apart. It came out hot every day around noon, and I had many days when that was my entire meal.
"We had half an hour, I think, for tea. When I had money enough, I used to go to a coffee-shop, and have half a pint of coffee, and a slice of bread-and-butter. When I had no money, I took a turn in Covent Garden market, and stared at the pineapples. The coffee-shops to which I most resorted were, one in Maiden Lane; one in a court (non-existent now) close to Hungerford market; and one in St. Martin's Lane, of which I only recollect that it stood near the church,[57] and that in the door there was an oval glass plate, with coffee-room painted on it, addressed towards the street. If I ever find myself in a very different kind of coffee-room now, but where there is such an inscription on glass, and read it backward on the wrong side moor-eeffoc (as I often used to do then, in a dismal reverie,) a shock goes through my blood.
"We had about half an hour for tea, I think. When I had enough money, I used to go to a coffee shop, get half a pint of coffee, and a slice of bread and butter. When I was broke, I strolled through Covent Garden market and stared at the pineapples. The coffee shops I went to the most were one in Maiden Lane, one in a court (which doesn’t exist anymore) near Hungerford market, and one in St. Martin's Lane. I only remember that it was near the church, and that there was an oval glass plate in the door with the words break room painted on it, facing the street. If I ever find myself in a very different kind of coffee room now, but with that kind of glass inscription, and see it backward on the wrong side coffee (which I often did back then, lost in a gloomy daydream), I feel a shiver run through my blood.[57]"
"I know I do not exaggerate, unconsciously and unintentionally, the scantiness of my resources and the difficulties of my life. I know that if a shilling or so were given me by any one, I spent it in a dinner or a tea. I know that I worked, from morning to night, with common men and boys, a shabby child. I know that I tried, but ineffectually, not to anticipate my money, and to make it last the week through; by putting it away in a drawer I had in the counting-house, wrapped into six little parcels, each parcel containing the same amount and labeled with a different day. I know that I have lounged about the streets, insufficiently and unsatisfactorily fed. I know that, but for the mercy of God, I might easily have been, for any care that was taken of me, a little robber or a little vagabond.
I know I'm not exaggerating, either consciously or unconsciously, about how limited my resources are and the struggles I've faced in life. I realize that if someone gave me a shilling or so, I’d just spend it on a meal or tea. I worked from morning to night alongside everyday people and boys, looking pretty shabby myself. I know I tried, though unsuccessfully, to resist spending my money too soon and to make it last for the week; I would put it away in a drawer in the counting-house, wrapped in six little bundles, each containing the same amount and labeled for a different day. I know I’ve wandered the streets, not getting enough to eat or feeling satisfied. I’m aware that without God's mercy, I could have easily turned into a little thief or a little drifter due to the lack of care I received.
"But I held some station at the blacking-warehouse too. Besides that my relative at the counting-house did what a man so occupied, and dealing with a thing so anomalous, could, to treat me as one upon a different footing from the rest, I never said, to man or boy, how it was that I came to be there, or gave the least indication of being sorry that I was there. That I suffered in secret, and that I suffered exquisitely, no one ever knew but I. How much I suffered, it is, as I have said already, utterly beyond my power to tell. No[58] man's imagination can overstep the reality. But I kept my own counsel, and I did my work. I knew from the first that, if I could not do my work as well as any of the rest, I could not hold myself above slight and contempt. I soon became at least as expeditious and as skillful with my hands as either of the other boys. Though perfectly familiar with them, my conduct and manners were different enough from theirs to place a space between us. They, and the men, always spoke of me as 'the young gentleman.' A certain man (a soldier once) named Thomas, who was the foreman, and another named Harry, who was the carman and wore a red jacket, used to call me 'Charles' sometimes, in speaking to me; but I think it was mostly when we were very confidential, and when I had made some efforts to entertain them over our work with the results of some of the old readings, which were fast perishing out of my mind. Poll Green uprose once, and rebelled against the 'young gentleman' usage; but Bob Fagin settled him speedily.
"But I had a position at the blacking warehouse too. Besides that, my relative at the counting house did what he could, given the unusual situation, to treat me differently from the others. I never told anyone how I ended up there, nor did I show any sign of being unhappy about it. The pain I felt was kept secret, and I suffered intensely—no one else knew but me. It's hard to express just how much I suffered; it's beyond what anyone can imagine. But I kept my thoughts to myself and focused on my work. I realized from the beginning that if I couldn't do my job as well as the others, I’d be subject to ridicule and disdain. I quickly became at least as quick and skilled with my hands as any of the other boys. Although I was familiar with them, my behavior and manners were different enough to create a distance between us. They and the men always referred to me as 'the young gentleman.' A certain man named Thomas, who had once been a soldier and was the foreman, and another named Harry, the carman in a red jacket, sometimes called me 'Charles' when speaking to me—mostly when we were feeling friendly, and I had shared some of the old readings that were quickly fading from my mind. Once, Poll Green got upset about the 'young gentleman' label, but Bob Fagin quickly put him in his place."
"My rescue from this kind of existence I considered quite hopeless, and abandoned as such, altogether; though I am solemnly convinced that I never, for one hour, was reconciled to it, or was otherwise than miserably unhappy. I felt keenly, however, the being so cut off from my parents, my brothers and sisters, and, when my day's work was done, going home to such a miserable blank; and that, I thought, might be corrected. One Sunday night I remonstrated with my father on this head, so pathetically, and with so many tears, that his kind nature gave way. He began to think that it was not quite right. I do believe he[59] had never thought so before, or thought about it. It was the first remonstrance I had ever made about my lot, and perhaps it opened up a little more than I intended. A back-attic was found for me at the house of an insolvent-court agent, who lived in Lant Street in the borough, where Bob Sawyer lodged many years afterwards. A bed and bedding were sent over for me, and made up on the floor. The little window had a pleasant prospect of a timber-yard; and when I took possession of my new abode I thought it was a Paradise."
"I thought my escape from this kind of life was completely hopeless and had given up on it altogether; yet I truly believe that I was never at peace with it or anything but miserable. I felt the loss of my parents, my siblings, and after a long day’s work, coming home to such a bleak emptiness; and that, I thought, could be changed. One Sunday night, I pleaded with my father about this so emotionally and with so many tears that his kind nature softened. He began to realize that it might not be quite right. I genuinely don’t think he had thought about it before. It was the first time I ever spoke out about my situation, and maybe it opened up more than I meant to share. They found me a room in the attic of a court agent who lived on Lant Street in the borough, where Bob Sawyer would stay many years later. A bed and bedding were sent over and set up on the floor. The small window offered a nice view of a lumberyard; and when I moved into my new place, I thought it was a Paradise."
There is here another blank, which it is, however, not difficult to supply from letters and recollections of my own. What was to him of course the great pleasure of his paradise of a lodging was its bringing him again, though after a fashion sorry enough, within the circle of home. From this time he used to breakfast "at home,"—in other words, in the Marshalsea; going to it as early as the gates were open, and for the most part much earlier. They had no want of bodily comforts there. His father's income, still going on, was amply sufficient for that; and in every respect indeed but elbow-room, I have heard him say, the family lived more comfortably in prison than they had done for a long time out of it. They were waited on still by the maid-of-all-work from Bayham Street, the orphan girl of the Chatham workhouse, from whose sharp little worldly and also kindly ways he took his first impression of the Marchioness in the Old Curiosity Shop. She also had a lodging in the neighborhood, that she might be early on the scene of her duties; and when Charles met her, as he would do occasionally, in his lounging-place by London Bridge, he would occupy the time before[60] the gates opened by telling her quite astonishing fictions about the wharves and the tower. "But I hope I believed them myself," he would say. Besides breakfast, he had supper also in the prison, and got to his lodging generally at nine o'clock. The gates closed always at ten.
There’s another gap here, but it's not hard to fill in with my own letters and memories. For him, the biggest joy of his paradise-like lodging was that it brought him back, albeit in a rather sad way, into the comfort of home. From that point on, he would have breakfast “at home”—meaning in the Marshalsea—arriving as soon as the gates opened, often much earlier. They had no shortage of physical comforts there. His father’s ongoing income was more than enough for that, and in every way except for a lack of space, I’ve heard him say the family lived more comfortably in prison than they had for a long time outside it. They were still looked after by the maid-of-all-work from Bayham Street, the orphan girl from the Chatham workhouse, whose sharp yet kind ways gave him his first impression of the Marchioness in the Old Curiosity Shop. She also had a place nearby so she could start her duties early, and when Charles ran into her, as he occasionally did at his hangout by London Bridge, he would spend the time before[60] the gates opened telling her some pretty outrageous stories about the wharves and the tower. “But I hope I believed them myself,” he would say. Besides breakfast, he also had supper in the prison and usually got to his lodging around nine o’clock. The gates always closed at ten.
I must not omit what he told me of the landlord of this little lodging. He was a fat, good-natured, kind old gentleman. He was lame, and had a quiet old wife; and he had a very innocent grown-up son, who was lame too. They were all very kind to the boy. He was taken with one of his old attacks of spasm one night, and the whole three of them were about his bed until morning. They were all dead when he told me this; but in another form they still live very pleasantly as the Garland family in the Old Curiosity Shop.
I shouldn’t leave out what he told me about the landlord of this little place. He was a big, friendly, kind old man. He was lame and had a quiet old wife, and they had a simple-minded grown son who was also lame. They were all very caring towards the boy. One night, he had one of his old spasms, and the three of them stayed by his side until morning. They were all gone when he told me this, but they still live on happily in another form as the Garland family in the Old Curiosity Shop.
He had a similar illness one day in the warehouse, which I can describe in his own words: "Bob Fagin was very good to me on the occasion of a bad attack of my old disorder. I suffered such excruciating pain that time, that they made a temporary bed of straw in my old recess in the counting-house, and I rolled about on the floor, and Bob filled empty blacking-bottles with hot water, and applied relays of them to my side, half the day. I got better, and quite easy towards evening; but Bob (who was much bigger and older than I) did not like the idea of my going home alone, and took me under his protection. I was too proud to let him know about the prison, and, after making several efforts to get rid of him, to all of which Bob Fagin in his goodness was deaf, shook hands with him on the steps of a house near Southwark Bridge on the Surrey side,[61] making believe that I lived there. As a finishing piece of reality in case of his looking back, I knocked at the door, I recollect, and asked, when the woman opened it, if that was Mr. Robert Fagin's house."
He had a similar illness one day in the warehouse, which I can describe in his own words: "Bob Fagin was really kind to me during a bad episode of my old condition. I was in so much pain that they made a temporary bed of straw in my old spot in the counting-house, and I was rolling around on the floor, while Bob filled empty blacking bottles with hot water and kept applying them to my side for half the day. I started to feel better and more comfortable by evening; but Bob (who was much bigger and older than I was) didn't like the idea of me going home alone, so he decided to look after me. I was too proud to let him know about my time in prison, and after several attempts to shake him off, all of which Bob Fagin ignored out of kindness, I shook hands with him on the steps of a house near Southwark Bridge on the Surrey side,[61] pretending that I lived there. To make it seem real in case he looked back, I remember knocking on the door and asking the woman who opened it if that was Mr. Robert Fagin's house."
The Saturday nights continued, as before, to be precious to him. "My usual way home was over Blackfriars Bridge, and down that turning in the Blackfriars Road which has Rowland Hill's chapel on one side, and the likeness of a golden dog licking a golden pot over a shop-door on the other. There are a good many little low-browed old shops in that street, of a wretched kind; and some are unchanged now. I looked into one a few weeks ago, where I used to buy boot-laces on Saturday nights, and saw the corner where I once sat down on a stool to have a pair of ready-made half-boots fitted on. I have been seduced more than once, in that street on a Saturday night, by a show-van at a corner; and have gone in, with a very motley assemblage, to see the Fat-pig, the Wild-indian, and the Little-lady. There were two or three hat-manufactories there then (I think they are there still); and among the things which, encountered anywhere or under any circumstances, will instantly recall that time, is the smell of hat-making."
Saturday nights still meant a lot to him. "I usually took the route home over Blackfriars Bridge, then down that turn in the Blackfriars Road with Rowland Hill's chapel on one side and a golden dog licking a golden pot over a shop door on the other. There are plenty of little, old-fashioned shops in that street, many of them in pretty bad shape; some still look the same today. A few weeks ago, I peered into one where I used to buy boot laces on Saturday nights and saw the spot where I once sat on a stool to try on a pair of ready-made half-boots. I've been tempted more than once in that street on a Saturday night by a show van at the corner and ended up going in, along with a diverse crowd, to see the Fat-pig, the Wild Indian, and the Little Lady. There were a couple of hat-making factories back then (I think they’re still around); and one of the things that can instantly take me back to that time, no matter where I am or what’s happening, is the smell of hat-making."
His father's attempts to avoid going through the court having failed, all needful ceremonies had to be undertaken to obtain the benefit of the insolvent debtors' act; and in one of these little Charles had his part to play. One condition of the statute was that the wearing-apparel and personal matters retained were not to exceed twenty pounds sterling in value. "It was necessary, as a matter of form, that the clothes I wore should be seen by the official appraiser. I had a half-holiday[62] to enable me to call upon him, at his own time, at a house somewhere beyond the Obelisk. I recollect his coming out to look at me with his mouth full, and a strong smell of beer upon him, and saying good-naturedly that 'that would do,' and 'it was all right.' Certainly the hardest creditor would not have been disposed (even if he had been legally entitled) to avail himself of my poor white hat, little jacket, or corduroy trowsers. But I had a fat old silver watch in my pocket, which had been given me by my grandmother before the blacking-days, and I had entertained my doubts as I went along whether that valuable possession might not bring me over the twenty pounds. So I was greatly relieved, and made him a bow of acknowledgment as I went out."
His father's attempts to avoid going to court had failed, so all necessary steps had to be taken to benefit from the insolvent debtors' act, and little Charles had a role to play in this. One condition of the statute was that the clothes and personal items he kept couldn’t exceed twenty pounds sterling in value. "It was needed, as a formality, for the official appraiser to see the clothes I was wearing. I took a half-holiday[62] to visit him at his convenience, at a house somewhere beyond the Obelisk. I remember him coming out to look at me with his mouth full, smelling strongly of beer, and saying good-naturedly that 'that would do,' and 'it was all right.' Certainly, even the toughest creditor wouldn’t have been inclined (even if he were legally entitled) to seize my poor white hat, little jacket, or corduroy trousers. But I had a chunky old silver watch in my pocket, which my grandmother had given me before the days of working with blacking, and I had worried on my way whether that valuable possession might push me over the twenty pounds limit. So I was quite relieved and gave him a nod of thanks as I left."
Still, the want felt most by him was the companionship of boys of his own age. He had no such acquaintance. Sometimes he remembered to have played on the coal-barges at dinner-time, with Poll Green and Bob Fagin; but those were rare occasions. He generally strolled alone, about the back streets of the Adelphi, or explored the Adelphi arches. One of his favorite localities was a little public-house by the water-side, called the Fox-under-the-hill, approached by an underground passage which we once missed in looking for it together; and he had a vision which he has mentioned in Copperfield of sitting eating something on a bench outside, one fine evening, and looking at some coal-heavers dancing before the house. "I wonder what they thought of me," says David. He had himself already said the same in his fragment of autobiography.
Still, what he wanted most was the company of boys his own age. He had no friends like that. Sometimes he remembered playing on the coal barges at lunchtime with Poll Green and Bob Fagin, but those were rare moments. Usually, he walked alone through the back streets of the Adelphi or explored the arches there. One of his favorite spots was a small pub by the water called the Fox-under-the-hill, which you could get to via an underground passage that we once missed while looking for it together. He had a memory, which he mentioned in Copperfield, of sitting outside on a bench one lovely evening, eating something and watching some coal heavers dancing in front of the pub. "I wonder what they thought of me," says David. He had already reflected on the same thought in his own autobiography.
Another characteristic little incident he made afterwards[63] one of David's experiences, but I am able to give it here without the disguises that adapt it to the fiction: "I was such a little fellow, with my poor white hat, little jacket, and corduroy trowsers, that frequently, when I went into the bar of a strange public-house for a glass of ale or porter to wash down the saveloy and the loaf I had eaten in the street, they didn't like to give it me. I remember, one evening (I had been somewhere for my father, and was going back to the borough over Westminster Bridge), that I went into a public-house in Parliament Street,—which is still there, though altered,—at the corner of the short street leading into Cannon Row, and said to the landlord behind the bar, 'What is your very best—the VERY best—ale, a glass?' For the occasion was a festive one, for some reason: I forget why. It may have been my birthday, or somebody else's. 'Two-pence,' says he. 'Then,' says I, 'just draw me a glass of that, if you please, with a good head to it.' The landlord looked at me, in return, over the bar, from head to foot, with a strange smile on his face, and, instead of drawing the beer, looked round the screen and said something to his wife, who came out from behind it, with her work in her hand, and joined him in surveying me. Here we stand, all three, before me now, in my study in Devonshire Terrace. The landlord, in his shirt-sleeves, leaning against the bar window-frame; his wife, looking over the little half-door; and I, in some confusion, looking up at them from outside the partition. They asked me a good many questions, as what my name was, how old I was, where I lived, how I was employed, etc. etc. To all of[64] which, that I might commit nobody, I invented appropriate answers. They served me with the ale, though I suspect it was not the strongest on the premises; and the landlord's wife, opening the little half-door and bending down, gave me a kiss that was half admiring and half compassionate, but all womanly and good, I am sure."
Another little incident he mentioned later[63] was one of David's experiences, but I can share it here without the fictional embellishments: "I was such a tiny kid, with my poor white hat, little jacket, and corduroy pants, that often when I walked into a strange pub for a glass of ale or porter to wash down the saveloy and the loaf I had eaten on the street, they were reluctant to serve me. I remember one evening (I had been out for my father and was heading back to the borough over Westminster Bridge), I went into a pub in Parliament Street—which is still there, though changed—at the corner of the short street leading into Cannon Row, and asked the landlord behind the bar, 'What is your very best—the VERY best—ale, a glass?' It was a festive occasion for some reason: I can't recall why. It might have been my birthday, or someone else's. 'Two pence,' he replied. 'Then,' I said, 'just pour me a glass of that, please, with a good head on it.' The landlord looked me over, head to toe, with a strange smile on his face, and instead of pouring the beer, he turned to the side and said something to his wife, who came out from behind the screen with her work in hand and joined him in watching me. Here we stand, all three, before me now in my study on Devonshire Terrace. The landlord, in his shirt sleeves, leaning against the bar window frame; his wife looking over the little half-door; and me, a bit confused, looking up at them from outside the partition. They asked me a lot of questions, like what my name was, how old I was, where I lived, how I was employed, etc. etc. To which, so as not to implicate anyone, I made up fitting answers. They served me the ale, although I suspected it wasn't the strongest on the premises; and the landlord's wife, opening the little half-door and bending down, gave me a kiss that was half admiring and half compassionate, but definitely all womanly and kind."
A later, and not less characteristic, incident of the true story of this time found also a place, three or four years after it was written, in his now famous fiction. It preceded but by a short time the discharge, from the Marshalsea, of the elder Dickens; to whom a rather considerable legacy from a relative had accrued not long before ("some hundreds," I understood), and had been paid into court during his imprisonment. The scene to be described arose on the occasion of a petition drawn up by him before he left, praying, not for the abolition of imprisonment for debt, as David Copperfield relates, but for the less dignified but more accessible boon of a bounty to the prisoners to drink his majesty's health on his majesty's forthcoming birthday.
A later, equally notable event from this true story also appeared, three or four years after it was written, in his now-famous fiction. It occurred shortly before the release of the elder Dickens from the Marshalsea, who had recently received a substantial inheritance from a relative ("some hundreds," I heard), which had been deposited in court during his time in prison. The following scene took place when he submitted a petition before leaving, asking not for the end of imprisonment for debt, as David Copperfield describes, but for the less dignified yet more achievable favor of a grant for the prisoners to toast the king's health on his upcoming birthday.
"I mention the circumstance because it illustrates, to me, my early interest in observing people. When I went to the Marshalsea of a night, I was always delighted to hear from my mother what she knew about the histories of the different debtors in the prison; and when I heard of this approaching ceremony, I was so anxious to see them all come in, one after another (though I knew the greater part of them already, to speak to, and they me), that I got leave of absence on purpose, and established myself in a corner, near the[65] petition. It was stretched out, I recollect, on a great ironing-board, under the window, which in another part of the room made a bedstead at night. The internal regulations of the place, for cleanliness and order, and for the government of a common room in the ale-house, where hot water and some means of cooking, and a good fire, were provided for all who paid a very small subscription, were excellently administered by a governing committee of debtors, of which my father was chairman for the time being. As many of the principal officers of this body as could be got into the small room without filling it up, supported him, in front of the petition; and my old friend Captain Porter (who had washed himself, to do honor to so solemn an occasion) stationed himself close to it, to read it to all who were unacquainted with its contents. The door was then thrown open, and they began to come in, in a long file; several waiting on the landing outside, while one entered, affixed his signature, and went out. To everybody in succession, Captain Porter said, 'Would you like to hear it read?' If he weakly showed the least disposition to hear it, Captain Porter, in a loud sonorous voice, gave him every word of it. I remember a certain luscious roll he gave to such words as 'Majesty—gracious Majesty—your gracious Majesty's unfortunate subjects—your Majesty's well-known munificence,'—as if the words were something real in his mouth, and delicious to taste; my poor father meanwhile listening with a little of an author's vanity, and contemplating (not severely) the spikes on the opposite wall. Whatever was comical in this scene, and whatever was pathetic, I sincerely believe I perceived in my corner,[66] whether I demonstrated or not, quite as well as I should perceive it now. I made out my own little character and story for every man who put his name to the sheet of paper. I might be able to do that now, more truly: not more earnestly, or with a closer interest. Their different peculiarities of dress, of face, of gait, of manner, were written indelibly upon my memory. I would rather have seen it than the best play ever played; and I thought about it afterwards, over the pots of paste-blacking, often and often. When I looked, with my mind's eye, into the Fleet prison during Mr. Pickwick's incarceration, I wonder whether half a dozen men were wanting from the Marshalsea crowd that came filing in again, to the sound of Captain Porter's voice!"
I mention this because it shows my early interest in observing people. When I went to the Marshalsea at night, I always loved hearing from my mother about the stories of the different debtors in the prison; and when I heard about this upcoming ceremony, I was so eager to see them all come in, one after another (even though I already knew most of them, and they knew me), that I took a leave of absence just for this and settled into a corner near the[65] petition. I remember it was laid out on a big ironing board under the window, which served as a bed panel at night. The internal rules of the place, for cleanliness and order, and for managing a common room in the ale-house, where hot water and some cooking facilities and a good fire were available to anyone who paid a small fee, were well-managed by a governing committee of debtors, with my father as chairman at the time. As many of the main officers of this group as could fit into the small room without crowding it gathered in front of the petition; my old friend Captain Porter (who had cleaned himself up to honor such a serious occasion) stood nearby to read it to anyone unfamiliar with its content. The door was then thrown open, and they started coming in, in a long line; several waited in the hallway outside, while one entered, signed his name, and left. To each person in turn, Captain Porter asked, "Would you like to hear it read?" If he showed even the slightest interest in hearing it, Captain Porter would, in a loud, booming voice, read every word of it. I remember the way he emphasized certain phrases like "Majesty—gracious Majesty—your gracious Majesty's unfortunate subjects—your Majesty's well-known generosity," as if those words were something real in his mouth and delicious to savor; my poor father, meanwhile, listened with a bit of an author's pride, contemplating (not harshly) the spikes on the opposite wall. Whatever was funny in this scene, and whatever was moving, I truly believe I perceived from my corner,[66] whether I showed it or not, just as well as I would now. I created my own little character and story for every man who signed the sheet of paper. I might be able to do that now, even more accurately: not more earnestly, or with a closer interest. Their different quirks in dress, face, walk, and manner were indelibly etched in my memory. I would have preferred to see that over the best play ever performed; and I thought about it later, often, while cleaning the paste. When I looked, with my mind's eye, into Fleet prison during Mr. Pickwick's incarceration, I wonder if half a dozen men were missing from the Marshalsea crowd that came filing in again, to the sound of Captain Porter's voice!
When the family left the Marshalsea they all went to lodge with the lady in Little College Street, a Mrs. Roylance, who has obtained unexpected immortality as Mrs. Pipchin; and they afterwards occupied a small house in Somers-town. But, before this time, Charles was present with some of them in Tenterden Street to see his sister. Fanny received one of the prizes given to the pupils of the Royal Academy of Music. "I could not bear to think of myself—beyond the reach of all such honorable emulation and success. The tears ran down my face. I felt as if my heart were rent. I prayed, when I went to bed that night, to be lifted out of the humiliation and neglect in which I was. I never had suffered so much before. There was no envy in this." There was little need that he should say so. Extreme enjoyment in witnessing the exercise of her talents, the utmost pride in every success obtained by them, he[67] manifested always to a degree otherwise quite unusual with him; and on the day of her funeral, which we passed together, I had most affecting proof of his tender and grateful memory of her in these childish days. A few more sentences, certainly not less touching than any that have gone before, will bring the story of them to its close. They stand here exactly as written by him:
When the family left the Marshalsea, they all went to stay with a lady on Little College Street, Mrs. Roylance, who gained unexpected fame as Mrs. Pipchin. Later, they moved into a small house in Somers Town. But before that, Charles was with some of them on Tenterden Street to see his sister. Fanny received one of the awards given to students at the Royal Academy of Music. "I couldn't stand to think of myself—out of reach of such honorable competition and success. Tears streamed down my face. I felt like my heart was breaking. That night, when I went to bed, I prayed to be lifted out of the humiliation and neglect I was feeling. I had never suffered so much before. There was no envy in this." He didn’t need to say that. He showed extreme joy in witnessing her talents and the utmost pride in every accomplishment they achieved, in a way that was quite unusual for him. On the day of her funeral, which we attended together, I received the most touching proof of his fond and grateful memories of her from those childhood days. A few more sentences, certainly as moving as any that have come before, will bring their story to a close. They are presented here exactly as he wrote them:
"I am not sure that it was before this time, or after it, that the blacking-warehouse was removed to Chandos Street, Covent Garden. It is no matter. Next to the shop at the corner of Bedford Street in Chandos Street are two rather old-fashioned houses and shops adjoining one another. They were one then, or thrown into one, for the blacking-business; and had been a butter-shop. Opposite to them was, and is, a public-house, where I got my ale, under these new circumstances. The stones in the street may be smoothed by my small feet going across to it at dinner-time, and back again. The establishment was larger now, and we had one or two new boys. Bob Fagin and I had attained to great dexterity in tying up the pots. I forget how many we could do in five minutes. We worked, for the light's sake, near the second window as you come from Bedford Street; and we were so brisk at it that the people used to stop and look in. Sometimes there would be quite a little crowd there. I saw my father coming in at the door one day when we were very busy, and I wondered how he could bear it.
"I'm not sure if it was before this time or after that the blacking warehouse moved to Chandos Street, Covent Garden. It doesn't really matter. Next to the shop at the corner of Bedford Street on Chandos Street are two somewhat old-fashioned houses and shops that are next to each other. They were combined then for the blacking business and had previously been a butter shop. Across from them was, and still is, a pub where I went to get my ale in these new circumstances. The stones in the street may have been smoothed by my little feet as I crossed over to it at lunchtime and back again. The place was bigger now, and we had one or two new boys. Bob Fagin and I had become really skilled at tying up the pots. I can't remember how many we could do in five minutes. We worked, for better light, near the second window as you come from Bedford Street, and we were so quick at it that people would stop and look inside. Sometimes, there would even be a little crowd there. One day when we were very busy, I saw my dad come in through the door, and I wondered how he could handle it."
"Now, I generally had my dinner in the warehouse. Sometimes I brought it from home, so I was better off.[68] I see myself coming across Russell Square from Somers-town, one morning, with some cold hotch-potch in a small basin tied up in a handkerchief. I had the same wanderings about the streets as I used to have, and was just as solitary and self-dependent as before; but I had not the same difficulty in merely living. I never, however, heard a word of being taken away, or of being otherwise than quite provided for.
"These days, I usually had my dinner in the warehouse. Sometimes I brought it from home, which made life easier for me.[68] I remember crossing Russell Square from Somers Town one morning, carrying some cold hotch-potch in a small basin wrapped in a handkerchief. I wandered the streets just like I used to, feeling just as alone and self-reliant as before; but I found it easier to just get by. I never heard a word about being taken away or about not being fully taken care of."
"At last, one day, my father, and the relative so often mentioned, quarreled; quarreled by letter, for I took the letter from my father to him which caused the explosion, but quarreled very fiercely. It was about me. It may have had some backward reference, in part, for anything I know, to my employment at the window. All I am certain of is, that, soon after I had given him the letter, my cousin (he was a sort of cousin, by marriage) told me he was very much insulted about me, and that it was impossible to keep me after that. I cried very much, partly because it was so sudden, and partly because in his anger he was violent about my father, though gentle to me. Thomas, the old soldier, comforted me, and said he was sure it was for the best. With a relief so strange that it was like oppression, I went home.
"Finally, one day, my father and the relative I've mentioned a lot got into a fierce argument. They fought through letters, as I had delivered a letter from my father to him that triggered the confrontation. It was about me. There might have been some previous context related to my job at the window, but I can't say for sure. All I know is that shortly after I gave him the letter, my cousin (he was a kind of cousin, through marriage) told me he felt very insulted because of me and that it was impossible for him to keep me around after that. I cried a lot, mostly because it was so unexpected and also because, in his anger, he was harsh towards my father, even though he was gentle with me. Thomas, the old soldier, tried to comfort me and assured me that it was for the best. I went home feeling an odd sense of relief that felt almost like a weight pressing down on me."
"My mother set herself to accommodate the quarrel, and did so next day. She brought home a request for me to return next morning, and a high character of me, which I am very sure I deserved. My father said I should go back no more, and should go to school. I do not write resentfully or angrily; for I know how all these things have worked together to make me what I am; but I never afterwards forgot, I never shall forget,[69] I never can forget, that my mother was warm for my being sent back.
"My mom worked to resolve the argument and managed to do so the next day. She came back with a request for me to return the following morning and a glowing recommendation about me, which I’m sure I deserved. My dad insisted I shouldn’t go back anymore and should go to school instead. I’m not writing this in a resentful or angry way because I understand how all these things have contributed to making me who I am; however, I never forgot, I never will forget, I can never forget, that my mom was passionate about me going back.[69]
"From that hour until this at which I write, no word of that part of my childhood which I have now gladly brought to a close has passed my lips to any human being. I have no idea how long it lasted; whether for a year, or much more, or less. From that hour until this my father and my mother have been stricken dumb upon it. I have never heard the least allusion to it, however far off and remote, from either of them. I have never, until I now impart it to this paper, in any burst of confidence with any one, my own wife not excepted, raised the curtain I then dropped, thank God.
"Since that moment until now, I haven’t spoken a single word about that part of my childhood that I’m finally bringing to an end. I have no idea how long it went on; whether it lasted a year, much longer, or less. Since that moment, my father and mother have been completely silent about it. I’ve never heard even the slightest reference to it from either of them, no matter how distant. Until now, when I write it down, I have never shared it with anyone—not even my wife—since I closed that chapter, and I’m grateful for that."
"Until old Hungerford market was pulled down, until old Hungerford Stairs were destroyed, and the very nature of the ground changed, I never had the courage to go back to the place where my servitude began. I never saw it. I could not endure to go near it. For many years, when I came near to Robert Warren's in the Strand, I crossed over to the opposite side of the way, to avoid a certain smell of the cement they put upon the blacking-corks, which reminded me of what I was once. It was a very long time before I liked to go up Chandos Street. My old way home by the borough made me cry, after my eldest child could speak.
"Until the old Hungerford market was torn down, until the old Hungerford Stairs were demolished, and the very nature of the land changed, I never had the courage to return to the place where my servitude began. I never saw it. I couldn’t bear to go near it. For many years, when I walked past Robert Warren’s in the Strand, I crossed to the other side of the street to avoid a certain smell from the cement they put on the blacking-corks, which reminded me of what I used to be. It took me a very long time before I felt comfortable going up Chandos Street. My old route home by the borough made me cry, especially after my eldest child learned to speak."
"In my walks at night I have walked there often, since then, and by degrees I have come to write this. It does not seem a tithe of what I might have written, or of what I meant to write."
"In my nighttime strolls, I've often walked there since then, and over time I've come to write this. It doesn’t feel like even a fraction of what I could have written, or what I intended to write."
The substance of some after-talk explanatory of points in the narrative, of which a note was made at[70] the time, may be briefly added. He could hardly have been more than twelve years old when he left the place, and was still unusually small for his age; much smaller, though two years older, than his own eldest son was at the time of these confidences. His mother had been in the blacking-warehouse many times; his father not more than once or twice. The rivalry of Robert Warren by Jonathan's representatives, the cousins George and James, was carried to wonderful extremes in the way of advertisement; and they were all very proud, he told me, of the cat scratching the boot, which was their house's device. The poets in the house's regular employ he remembered, too, and made his first study from one of them for the poet of Mrs. Jarley's wax-work. The whole enterprise, however, had the usual end of such things. The younger cousin tired of the concern; and a Mr. Wood, the proprietor who took James's share and became George's partner, sold it ultimately to Robert Warren. It continued to be his at the time Dickens and myself last spoke of it together, and he had made an excellent bargain of it.
The essence of some follow-up explanations about points in the story, noted at[70] at the time, can be summed up briefly. He was probably no more than twelve years old when he left that place and was still quite small for his age; much smaller, despite being two years older, than his own eldest son when he shared these memories. His mother had been to the blacking warehouse many times; his father only once or twice. The competition from Robert Warren, represented by Jonathan's cousins George and James, reached remarkable heights in terms of advertising; they were all very proud, he told me, of the cat scratching the boot, which was their brand symbol. He also remembered the poets regularly employed by the company and had his first lesson from one of them, studying for the poet of Mrs. Jarley's waxwork. However, like many ventures of that kind, it had the usual outcome. The younger cousin lost interest in the business, and a Mr. Wood, the owner who took over James's share and became George's partner, ultimately sold it to Robert Warren. It remained in his possession the last time Dickens and I discussed it together, and he had made a great deal out of it.
CHAPTER III.
SCHOOL-DAYS AND START IN LIFE.
1824-1830.
In what way these strange experiences of his boyhood affected him afterwards, this narrative of his life must show; but there were influences that made themselves felt even on his way to manhood.
In what ways these strange experiences from his childhood impacted him later, this narrative of his life will reveal; but there were influences that became evident even as he was growing up.
What at once he brought out of the humiliation that had impressed him so deeply, though scarcely as yet quite consciously, was a natural dread of the hardships that might still be in store for him, sharpened by what he had gone through; and this, though in its effect for the present imperfectly understood, became by degrees a passionate resolve, even while he was yielding to circumstances, not to be what circumstances were conspiring[72] to make him. All that was involved in what he had suffered and sunk into, could not have been known to him at the time; but it was plain enough later, as we see; and in conversation with me after the revelation was made, he used to find, at extreme points in his life, the explanation of himself in those early trials. He had derived great good from them, but not without alloy. The fixed and eager determination, the restless and resistless energy, which opened to him opportunities of escape from many mean environments, not by turning off from any path of duty, but by resolutely rising to such excellence or distinction as might be attainable in it, brought with it some disadvantage among many noble advantages. Of this he was himself aware, but not to the full extent. What it was that in society made him often uneasy, shrinking, and over-sensitive, he knew; but all the danger he ran in bearing down and overmastering the feeling, he did not know. A too great confidence in himself, a sense that everything was possible to the will that would make it so, laid occasionally upon him self-imposed burdens greater than might be borne by any one with safety. In that direction there was in him, at such times, something even hard and aggressive; in his determinations a something that had almost the tone of fierceness; something in his nature that made his resolves insuperable, however hasty the opinions on which they had been formed. So rare were these manifestations, however, and so little did they prejudice a character as entirely open and generous as it was at all times ardent and impetuous, that only very infrequently, towards the close of the middle term of a friendship[73] which lasted without the interruption of a day for more than three-and-thirty years, were they ever unfavorably presented to me. But there they were; and when I have seen strangely present, at such chance intervals, a stern and even cold isolation of self-reliance side by side with a susceptivity almost feminine and the most eager craving for sympathy, it has seemed to me as though his habitual impulses for everything kind and gentle had sunk, for the time, under a sudden hard and inexorable sense of what fate had dealt to him in those early years. On more than one occasion, indeed, I had confirmation of this. "I must entreat you," he wrote to me in June, 1862, "to pause for an instant, and go back to what you know of my childish days, and to ask yourself whether it is natural that something of the character formed in me then, and lost under happier circumstances, should have reappeared in the last five years. The never-to-be-forgotten misery of that old time bred a certain shrinking sensitiveness in a certain ill-clad ill-fed child, that I have found come back in the never-to-be-forgotten misery of this later time."
What he initially drew from the humiliation that affected him so deeply, though he wasn't fully aware of it yet, was a natural fear of the difficulties that might still lie ahead, intensified by what he had endured. This, although not fully understood at the moment, gradually turned into a passionate resolve—while he was adapting to circumstances—not to be what those circumstances were conspiring to make him. All that was involved in what he had suffered and sunk into wasn’t clear to him at the time; but it became evident later, as we can see. In conversations with me after the truth was revealed, he often found that the explanation for himself at crucial moments in his life could be traced back to those early struggles. He gained a lot from them, but not without some drawbacks. The strong and eager determination, the restless and unstoppable energy, which opened up opportunities for him to escape many unpleasant situations, not by veering off from any path of duty, but by firmly rising to a level of excellence or distinction that was achievable, also came with some downsides among many noble benefits. He was aware of this but not entirely. He understood what made him often uneasy, withdrawn, and overly sensitive in society; however, he didn’t realize all the risks he faced in suppressing and overcoming those feelings. An overly high confidence in himself, a belief that everything was achievable with enough will, occasionally placed self-imposed burdens on him that were too heavy for anyone to handle safely. During those times, there was something almost harsh and aggressive in him; a fierceness in his determination that made his resolutions unbreakable, despite how quickly they had been formed. However, these instances were rare, and they hardly affected a character that was otherwise completely open and generous, as well as consistently passionate and impulsive. It was only very infrequently, towards the end of a friendship that lasted for more than thirty-three years without a single day’s interruption, that I ever witnessed them in a negative light. Yet, they were there; and when I occasionally saw a cold and stern isolation of self-reliance alongside a sensitivity almost feminine and a deep yearning for sympathy, it seemed to me that his usual tendencies toward kindness and gentleness had temporarily submerged under a sudden, harsh awareness of what fate had dealt him in those early years. On more than one occasion, I had confirmation of this. "I must urge you," he wrote to me in June 1862, "to take a moment and reflect back on what you know about my childhood, and to consider whether it’s natural for something of the character formed in me then, and lost under happier circumstances, to have resurfaced in the last five years. The unforgettable misery of that past created a certain sensitivity in a poorly dressed, malnourished child, which I’ve found has returned in the unforgettable misery of this later time."
One good there was, however, altogether without drawback, and which claims simply to be mentioned before my narrative is resumed. The story of his childish misery has itself sufficiently shown that he never throughout it lost his precious gift of animal spirits, or his native capacity for humorous enjoyment; and there were positive gains to him from what he underwent, which were also rich and lasting. To what in the outset of his difficulties and trials gave the decisive bent to his genius, I have already made special reference;[74] and we are to observe, of what followed, that with the very poor and unprosperous, out of whose sufferings and strugglings, and the virtues as well as vices born of them, his not least splendid successes were wrought, his childish experiences had made him actually one. They were not his clients whose cause he pleaded with such pathos and humor, and on whose side he got the laughter and tears of all the world, but in some sort his very self. Nor was it a small part of this manifest advantage that he should have obtained his experience as a child and not as a man; that only the good part, the flower and fruit of it, was plucked by him; and that nothing of the evil part, none of the earth in which the seed was planted, remained to soil him.
There was, however, one good thing that was completely without drawback, and it deserves to be mentioned before I continue my story. His childhood suffering clearly showed that he never lost his valuable sense of humor or his natural ability to enjoy life; in fact, he actually benefited from what he went through, which provided him with rich and lasting rewards. I’ve already pointed out what initially shaped his genius during his struggles;[74] and we should note that from what followed, he was actually one of the very poor and struggling people whose hardships and the virtues as well as vices that came from them led to some of his most remarkable successes. He wasn’t just advocating for his clients with such emotion and humor, eliciting laughter and tears from everyone. In a way, he was representing himself. An important advantage was that he gained this experience as a child, not as an adult; he only took the good parts, the best of it, and none of the negativity or the harsh realities that surrounded the seeds that were planted remained to taint him.
His next move in life can also be given in his own language: "There was a school in the Hampstead Road kept by Mr. Jones, a Welshman, to which my father dispatched me to ask for a card of terms. The boys were at dinner, and Mr. Jones was carving for them with a pair of holland sleeves on, when I acquitted myself of this commission. He came out, and gave me what I wanted; and hoped I should become a pupil. I did. At seven o'clock one morning, very soon afterwards, I went as day-scholar to Mr. Jones's establishment, which was in Mornington Place, and had its school-room sliced away by the Birmingham Railway, when that change came about. The school-room, however, was not threatened by directors or civil engineers then, and there was a board over the door, graced with the words Wellington House Academy."
His next step in life can also be described in his own words: "There was a school on Hampstead Road run by Mr. Jones, a Welshman, where my father sent me to ask for a brochure of fees. The boys were having dinner, and Mr. Jones was serving them while wearing a pair of holland sleeves when I carried out this task. He came out and gave me what I needed and hoped I would become a student. I did. One morning at seven o'clock, shortly after that, I enrolled as a day student at Mr. Jones's school, which was located on Mornington Place, and its classroom was partially sliced by the Birmingham Railway when that change happened. The classroom wasn't under threat from directors or civil engineers then, and there was a sign above the door with the words Wellington House Academy."
At Wellington House Academy he remained nearly two years, being a little over fourteen years of age when[75] he quitted it. In his minor writings as well as in Copperfield will be found general allusions to it, and there is a paper among his pieces reprinted from Household Words which purports specifically to describe it. To the account therein given of himself when he went to the school, as advanced enough, so safely had his memory retained its poor fragments of early schooling, to be put into Virgil, as getting sundry prizes, and as attaining to the eminent position of its first boy, one of his two schoolfellows with whom I have had communication makes objection; but both admit that the general features of the place are reproduced with wonderful accuracy, and more especially in those points for which the school appears to have been much more notable than for anything connected with the scholarship of its pupils.
At Wellington House Academy, he stayed for almost two years, being just over fourteen years old when he left. In his shorter writings as well as in Copperfield, you can find general references to it, and there's a piece among his works reprinted from Household Words that specifically aims to describe it. Regarding the account of himself when he first attended the school, it was stated that he was advanced enough to be put into Virgil, won several prizes, and reached the notable position of being the top student. One of his two classmates I've spoken with disagrees with this, but they both agree that the general characteristics of the place are captured with remarkable accuracy, especially in those aspects for which the school seemed to be more known than for the academic achievements of its students.
In the reprinted piece Dickens describes it as remarkable for white mice. He says that red-polls, linnets, and even canaries were kept by the boys in desks, drawers, hat-boxes, and other strange refuges for birds; but that white mice were the favorite stock, and that the boys trained the mice much better than the master trained the boys. He recalled in particular one white mouse who lived in the cover of a Latin dictionary, ran up ladders, drew Roman chariots, shouldered muskets, turned wheels, and even made a very creditable appearance on the stage as the dog of Montàrgis, who might have achieved greater things but for having had the misfortune to mistake his way in a triumphal procession to the Capitol, when he fell into a deep inkstand and was dyed black and drowned.
In the reprinted piece, Dickens describes it as notable for having white mice. He mentions that the boys kept red-polls, linnets, and even canaries in desks, drawers, hat boxes, and other unusual spots for birds; but white mice were the favorite pets, and the boys trained the mice much better than the master trained them. He specifically remembered one white mouse that lived in the cover of a Latin dictionary, ran up ladders, pulled Roman chariots, carried muskets, turned wheels, and even had a surprisingly good performance on stage as the dog of Montàrgis, who might have accomplished greater feats if he hadn’t had the bad luck of getting lost during a triumphal procession to the Capitol, where he fell into a deep inkstand and ended up black and drowned.
Nevertheless he mentions the school as one also of[76] some celebrity in its neighborhood, though nobody could have said why; and adds that among the boys the master was supposed to know nothing, and one of the ushers was supposed to know everything. "We are still inclined to think the first-named supposition perfectly correct. We went to look at the place only this last midsummer, and found that the railway had cut it up, root and branch. A great trunk line had swallowed the playground, sliced away the school-room, and pared off the corner of the house. Which, thus curtailed of its proportions, presented itself in a green stage of stucco, profile-wise towards the road, like a forlorn flat-iron without a handle, standing on end."
Nevertheless, he mentions the school as a notable place in its area, though no one could say exactly why; and adds that among the boys, the teacher was thought to know nothing, while one of the assistants was believed to know everything. "We still tend to think the first assumption is completely accurate. We visited the place just last midsummer and found that the railway had completely divided it. A major train line had taken over the playground, chopped off the schoolroom, and trimmed the corner of the building. Now, reduced in size, it stood in a green layer of stucco, facing the road, looking like a lonely flat-iron without a handle, standing upright."
One who knew him in those early days, Mr. Owen P. Thomas, thus writes to me (February, 1871): "I had the honor of being Mr. Dickens's schoolfellow for about two years (1824-1826), both being day-scholars, at Mr. Jones's 'Classical and Commercial Academy,' as then inscribed in front of the house, and which was situated at the corner of Granby Street and the Hampstead Road. The house stands now in its original state, but the school and large playground behind disappeared on the formation of the London and Northwestern Railway, which at this point runs in a slanting direction from Euston Square underneath the Hampstead Road. We were all companions and playmates when out of school, as well as fellow-students therein." (Mr. Thomas includes in this remark the names of Henry Danson, now a physician in practice in London; of Daniel Tobin, whom I remember to have been frequently assisted by his old schoolfellow in later years; and of Richard Bray.) "You will find a graphic[77] sketch of the school by Mr. Dickens himself in Household Words of 11th October, 1851. The article is entitled Our School. The names of course are feigned; but, allowing for slight coloring, the persons and incidents described are all true to life, and easily recognizable by any one who attended the school at the time. The Latin master was Mr. Manville, or Mandeville, who for many years was well known at the library of the British Museum. The academy, after the railroad overthrew it, was removed to another house in the neighborhood, but Mr. Jones and two at least of his assistant masters have long ago departed this life."
One person who knew him back in those early days, Mr. Owen P. Thomas, writes to me (February 1871): "I had the privilege of being Mr. Dickens's schoolmate for about two years (1824-1826), both of us being day students at Mr. Jones's 'Classical and Commercial Academy,' as it was labeled in front of the building, which was located at the corner of Granby Street and the Hampstead Road. The building still stands in its original form, but the school and the large playground behind it disappeared when the London and Northwestern Railway was constructed, which runs diagonally from Euston Square underneath the Hampstead Road at this point. We were all friends and playmates outside of school, as well as classmates inside it." (Mr. Thomas mentions the names of Henry Danson, who is now a practicing physician in London; Daniel Tobin, whom I remember often helped by his old schoolmate in later years; and Richard Bray.) "You will find a detailed sketch of the school by Mr. Dickens himself in Household Words from October 11, 1851. The article is titled Our School. The names, of course, are fictional; but, with a little embellishment, the people and events described are all accurate and easily recognized by anyone who attended the school at the time. The Latin teacher was Mr. Manville, or Mandeville, who was well known at the British Museum library for many years. After the railroad disrupted it, the academy moved to another building in the area, but Mr. Jones and at least two of his assistant teachers have long since passed away."
One of the latter was the usher believed to know everything, who was writing-master, mathematical master, English master, divided the little boys with the Latin master, made out the bills, mended the pens, and always called at parents' houses to inquire after sick boys, because he had gentlemanly manners. This picture my correspondent recognized; as well as those of the fat little dancing-master who taught them hornpipes, of the Latin master who stuffed his ears with onions for his deafness, of the gruff serving-man who nursed the boys in scarlet fever, and of the principal himself, who was always ruling ciphering-books with a bloated mahogany ruler, smiting the palms of offenders with the same diabolical instrument, or viciously drawing a pair of pantaloons tight with one of his large hands and caning the wearer with the other.
One of the latter was the usher who seemed to know everything. He was the writing teacher, math teacher, and English teacher, shared the little boys with the Latin teacher, handled the bills, fixed the pens, and always dropped by parents' homes to check on sick boys because he had polite manners. My correspondent recognized this picture; as well as those of the chubby little dance teacher who taught them hornpipes, the Latin teacher who stuffed his ears with onions for his deafness, the harsh serving man who took care of the boys during scarlet fever, and the principal himself, who was always ruling ciphering books with a thick mahogany ruler, smacking the hands of offenders with the same tool, or maliciously pulling a pair of pants tight with one of his large hands and caning the wearer with the other.
"My recollection of Dickens whilst at school," Mr. Thomas continues, "is that of a healthy-looking boy, small but well built, with a more than usual flow of spirits, inducing to harmless fun, seldom or never I[78] think to mischief, to which so many lads at that age are prone. I cannot recall anything that then indicated he would hereafter become a literary celebrity; but perhaps he was too young then. He usually held his head more erect than lads ordinarily do, and there was a general smartness about him. His weekday dress of jacket and trowsers, I can clearly remember, was what is called pepper-and-salt; and, instead of the frill that most boys of his age wore then, he had a turn-down collar, so that he looked less youthful in consequence. He invented what we termed a 'lingo,' produced by the addition of a few letters of the same sound to every word; and it was our ambition, walking and talking thus along the street, to be considered foreigners. As an alternate amusement the present writer well remembers extemporizing tales of some sort, and reciting them offhand, with Dickens and Danson or Tobin walking on either side of him. I inclose you a copy of a note I received from him when he was between thirteen and fourteen years of age, perhaps one of the earliest productions of his pen. The Leg referred to was the Legend of something, a pamphlet romance I had lent him; the Clavis was of course the Latin school-book so named."
"My memory of Dickens from school," Mr. Thomas continues, "is of a healthy-looking boy, small but well-built, with a lively spirit that led to harmless fun, rarely or never, I think, to mischief, which many boys his age tend to fall into. I can't recall anything that suggested he would later become a literary star; maybe he was just too young then. He often held his head higher than most boys do, and there was a general sharpness about him. I clearly remember his weekday outfit of a jacket and trousers, which was what’s called pepper-and-salt; instead of the ruffled collar that most boys his age wore, he had a turn-down collar, which made him look a bit older as a result. He created what we called a 'lingo,' which added a few letters of the same sound to every word; our goal while walking and talking like that down the street was to be seen as foreigners. As another way to have fun, I remember improvising stories of some kind and reciting them on the spot, with Dickens and Danson or Tobin walking on either side of me. I'm enclosing you a copy of a note I received from him when he was about thirteen or fourteen, probably one of the first things he wrote. The Leg mentioned was the Legend of something, a pamphlet romance I had lent him; the Clavis was, of course, the Latin schoolbook of the same name."
There is some underlying whim or fun in the "Leg" allusions which Mr. Thomas appears to have overlooked, and certainly fails to explain; but the note, which is here given in fac-simile, may be left to speak for itself; and in the signature the reader will be amused to see the first faint beginning of a flourish afterwards famous.[79]
There’s a playful element in the "Leg" references that Mr. Thomas seems to have missed and definitely doesn’t clarify; however, the note provided here in facsimile can speak for itself. Readers will likely enjoy seeing the initial hint of a signature flourish that became well-known later on.[79]

[80]"After a lapse of years," Mr. Thomas continues, "I recognized the celebrated writer as the individual I had known so well as a boy, from having preserved[81] this note; and upon Mr. Dickens visiting Reading in December, 1854, to give one of his earliest readings for the benefit of the literary institute, of which he had become president on Mr. Justice Talfourd's death, I took the opportunity of showing it to him, when he was much diverted therewith. On the same occasion we conversed about mutual schoolfellows, and among others Daniel Tobin was referred to, whom I remembered to have been Dickens's most intimate companion in the school-days (1824 to 1826). His reply was that Tobin either was then, or had previously been, assisting him in the capacity of amanuensis; but there is a subsequent mystery about Tobin, in connection with his friend and patron, which I have never been able to comprehend; for I understood shortly afterwards that there was entire separation between them, and it must have been an offense of some gravity to have sundered an acquaintance formed in early youth, and which had endured, greatly to Tobin's advantage, so long. He resided in our school-days in one of the now old and grimy-looking stone-fronted houses in George Street, Euston Road, a few doors from the Orange-tree tavern. It is the opinion of the other schoolfellow with whom we were intimate, Doctor Danson, that upon leaving school Mr. Dickens and Tobin entered the same solicitor's office, and this he thinks was either in or near Lincoln's Inn Fields."
[80] "After many years," Mr. Thomas continues, "I recognized the famous writer as the person I had known so well as a boy, thanks to this note I kept; and when Mr. Dickens visited Reading in December 1854 to give one of his earliest readings to support the literary institute, of which he had become president after Mr. Justice Talfourd's death, I took the chance to show it to him, and he found it quite amusing. We also talked about some of our mutual schoolmates, and Daniel Tobin came up. I recalled that he was Dickens's closest friend during our school days (1824 to 1826). Dickens replied that Tobin was either currently or had previously been helping him as his secretary; however, there’s a later mystery regarding Tobin and his relationship with Dickens that I've never figured out. I learned soon after that they had completely separated, and there must have been a serious reason behind it, given that their friendship from youth had lasted so long and had benefited Tobin greatly. He lived, during our school days, in one of those now old and shabby stone-fronted houses on George Street, Euston Road, just a few doors down from the Orange-tree tavern. Another schoolmate, Dr. Danson, believes that after leaving school, Mr. Dickens and Tobin both joined the same law firm, which he thinks was either in or near Lincoln's Inn Fields."
The offense of Tobin went no deeper than the having at last worn out even Dickens's patience and kindness. His applications for relief were so incessantly repeated, that to cut him and them adrift altogether was the only way of escape from what had become an[82] intolerable nuisance. To Mr. Thomas's letter the reader will thank me for adding one not less interesting with which Dr. Henry Danson has favored me. We have here, with the same fun and animal spirits, a little of the proneness to mischief which his other schoolfellow says he was free from; but the mischief is all of the harmless kind, and might perhaps have been better described as but part of an irrepressible vivacity:
The trouble with Tobin was that he had finally worn out even Dickens's patience and kindness. His requests for help were so constant that cutting him and his demands off completely was the only way to escape what had become an[82] unbearable nuisance. The reader will appreciate my adding another interesting letter from Dr. Henry Danson, in response to Mr. Thomas's correspondence. Here, along with the same humor and lively spirit, we see a bit of the mischief that his other schoolmate claims he didn't have; but the mischief is all harmless and could perhaps be better described as part of an unstoppable energy:
"My impression is that I was a schoolfellow of Dickens for nearly two years: he left before me, I think at about fifteen years of age. Mr. Jones's school, called the Wellington Academy, was in the Hampstead Road, at the northeast corner of Granby Street. The school-house was afterwards removed for the London and Northwestern Railway. It was considered at the time a very superior sort of school,—one of the best, indeed, in that part of London; but it was most shamefully mismanaged, and the boys made but very little progress. The proprietor, Mr. Jones, was a Welshman; a most ignorant fellow, and a mere tyrant; whose chief employment was to scourge the boys. Dickens has given a very lively account of this place in his paper entitled Our School, but it is very mythical in many respects, and more especially in the compliment he pays in it to himself. I do not remember that Dickens distinguished himself in any way, or carried off any prizes. My belief is that he did not learn Greek or Latin there; and you will remember there is no allusion to the classics in any of his writings. He was a handsome, curly-headed lad, full of animation and animal spirits, and probably[83] was connected with every mischievous prank in the school. I do not think he came in for any of Mr. Jones's scourging propensity: in fact, together with myself, he was only a day-pupil, and with these there was a wholesome fear of tales being carried home to the parents. His personal appearance at that time is vividly brought home to me in the portrait of him taken a few years later by Mr. Lawrence. He resided with his friends in a very small house in a street leading out of Seymour Street, north of Mr. Judkin's chapel.
My impression is that I was in school with Dickens for almost two years; he left before me, probably around age fifteen. Mr. Jones's school, called the Wellington Academy, was on the Hampstead Road, at the northeast corner of Granby Street. The school building was later taken down for the London and Northwestern Railway. At the time, it was considered a very good school—one of the best in that area of London; however, it was poorly managed, and the boys made very little progress. The owner, Mr. Jones, was a Welshman, a really ignorant guy, and a complete tyrant, whose main job was to punish the boys. Dickens wrote a very lively account of this place in his piece titled Our School, but it’s pretty mythical in many ways, especially the compliment he pays to himself in it. I don’t remember Dickens standing out in any way or winning any prizes. I believe he didn’t learn Greek or Latin there, and you'll notice he never mentions the classics in any of his writings. He was a handsome, curly-haired kid, full of energy and spirit, and probably got involved in every mischievous prank at the school. I don’t think he faced any of Mr. Jones's punishments; in fact, like me, he was just a day student, and for us, there was a real fear of our parents hearing any gossip. I vividly remember his appearance from a portrait taken a few years later by Mr. Lawrence. He lived with his friends in a tiny house on a street off Seymour Street, north of Mr. Judkin's chapel.
"Depend on it, he was quite a self-made man, and his wonderful knowledge and command of the English language must have been acquired by long and patient study after leaving his last school.
"Count on it, he was definitely a self-made man, and his amazing knowledge and mastery of the English language must have come from years of dedicated study after finishing his last school."
"I have no recollection of the boy you name. His chief associates were, I think, Tobin, Mr. Thomas, Bray, and myself. The first-named was his chief ally, and his acquaintance with him appears to have continued many years afterwards. At about that time Penny and Saturday Magazines were published weekly, and were greedily read by us. We kept bees, white mice, and other living things clandestinely in our desks; and the mechanical arts were a good deal cultivated, in the shape of coach-building, and making pumps and boats, the motive power of which was the white mice.
"I don’t remember the boy you’re talking about. His main friends were, I think, Tobin, Mr. Thomas, Bray, and me. Tobin was his closest ally, and it seems they stayed friends for many years after that. Around that time, Penny and Saturday Magazines were published weekly, and we eagerly read them. We secretly kept bees, white mice, and other small creatures in our desks, and we explored mechanical skills by building coaches and making pumps and boats, all powered by the white mice."
"I think at that time Dickens took to writing small tales, and we had a sort of club for lending and circulating them. Dickens was also very strong in using a sort of lingo, which made us quite unintelligible to bystanders. We were very strong, too, in theatricals.[84] We mounted small theatres, and got up very gorgeous scenery to illustrate the Miller and his Men and Cherry and Fair Star. I remember the present Mr. Beverley, the scene-painter, assisted us in this. Dickens was always a leader at these plays, which were occasionally presented with much solemnity before an audience of boys and in the presence of the ushers. My brother, assisted by Dickens, got up the Miller and his Men, in a very gorgeous form. Master Beverley constructed the mill for us in such a way that it could tumble to pieces with the assistance of crackers. At one representation the fireworks in the last scene, ending with the destruction of the mill, were so very real that the police interfered and knocked violently at the doors. Dickens's after-taste for theatricals might have had its origin in these small affairs.
I think back then, Dickens started writing short stories, and we had this club where we borrowed and shared them. He was also great at using a kind of slang that made us pretty hard to understand for anyone nearby. We were really into putting on plays, too.[84] We set up little theaters and created some amazing sets to bring to life the Miller and his Men and Cherry and Fair Star. I remember the current Mr. Beverley, the scene painter, helped us with this. Dickens always took charge during these plays, which we sometimes performed with a lot of seriousness in front of an audience of boys and the ushers. My brother, with Dickens’s help, staged Miller and his Men in a very elaborate way. Master Beverley built the mill so it could break apart with the help of fireworks. During one show, the fireworks in the final scene, which ended with the mill’s destruction, were so realistic that the police showed up and banged loudly on the doors. Dickens’s later interest in theater might have started with these little productions.
"I quite remember Dickens on one occasion heading us in Drummond Street in pretending to be poor boys, and asking the passers-by for charity,—especially old ladies, one of whom told us she 'had no money for beggar-boys.' On these adventures, when the old ladies were quite staggered by the impudence of the demand, Dickens would explode with laughter and take to his heels.
"I clearly remember Dickens one time leading us down Drummond Street, pretending to be poor boys and asking passers-by for donations—especially from old ladies, one of whom told us she 'had no money for beggar boys.' During these escapades, when the old ladies were completely shocked by our boldness, Dickens would burst out laughing and run away."
"I met him one Sunday morning shortly after he left the school, and we very piously attended the morning service at Seymour Street Chapel. I am sorry to say Master Dickens did not attend in the slightest degree to the service, but incited me to laughter by declaring his dinner was ready and the potatoes would be spoiled, and in fact behaved in such a manner that it was lucky for us we were not ejected from the chapel.[85]
I met him one Sunday morning shortly after he left school, and we went to the morning service at Seymour Street Chapel. I’m sorry to say Master Dickens didn’t pay any attention to the service at all; instead, he made me laugh by saying his dinner was ready and the potatoes would be ruined, and honestly, he behaved in such a way that we were lucky we weren’t kicked out of the chapel.[85]
"I heard of him some time after from Tobin, whom I met carrying a foaming pot of London particular in Lincoln's Inn Fields, and I then understood that Dickens was in the same or some neighboring office.
"I heard about him later from Tobin, whom I ran into while he was carrying a frothy pint of London particular in Lincoln's Inn Fields, and then I realized that Dickens was in the same or a nearby office."
"Many years elapsed after this before I became aware, from accidentally reading Our School, that the brilliant and now famous Dickens was my old schoolfellow. I didn't like to intrude myself upon him; and it was not until three or four years ago, when he presided at the University College dinner at Willis's rooms, and made a most brilliant and effective speech, that I sent him a congratulatory note reminding him of our former fellowship. To this he sent me a kind note in reply, and which I value very much. I send you copies of these."[5]
"Many years went by before I found out, by accidentally reading Our School, that the talented and now famous Dickens was my old schoolmate. I didn't want to impose on him, and it wasn't until three or four years ago, when he gave a fantastic and impactful speech at the University College dinner at Willis's rooms, that I sent him a congratulatory note reminding him of our past connection. He replied with a warm note, which I really appreciate. I'm sending you copies of these." [5]
From Dickens himself I never heard much allusion to the school thus described; but I knew that, besides being the subject dealt with in Household Words, it had supplied some of the lighter traits of Salem House for Copperfield; and that to the fact of one of its tutors being afterwards engaged to teach a boy of Macready's, our common friend, Dickens used to point for one of the illustrations of his favorite theory as to the smallness of the world, and how things and persons apparently the most unlikely to meet were continually knocking up against each other. The employment as his amanuensis of his schoolfellow Tobin dates as early as his Doctors'-Commons days, but both my correspondents are mistaken in the impression they appear to have received that Tobin had been previously his fellow-clerk in the same attorney's office. I had thought him more likely to have been accompanied there by another of his boyish acquaintances who became afterwards[87] a solicitor, Mr. Mitton, not recollected by either of my correspondents in connection with the school, but whom I frequently met with him in later years, and for whom he had the regard arising out of such early associations. In this, however, I have since discovered my own mistake: the truth being that it was this gentleman's connection, not with the Wellington Academy, but with a school kept by Mr. Dawson in Hunter Street, Brunswick Square, where the brothers of Dickens were subsequently placed, which led to their early knowledge of each other. I fancy that they were together also, for a short time, at Mr. Molloy's in New Square, Lincoln's Inn; but, whether or not this was so, Dickens certainly had not quitted school many months before his father had made sufficient interest with an attorney of Gray's Inn, Mr. Edward Blackmore, to obtain him regular employment in his office. In this capacity of clerk, our only trustworthy glimpse of him we owe to the last-named gentleman, who has described briefly, and I do not doubt authentically, the services so rendered by him to the law. It cannot be said that they were noteworthy, though it might be difficult to find a more distinguished person who has borne the title, unless we make exception for the very father of literature himself, whom Chaucer, with amusing illustration of the way in which words change their meanings, calls "that conceited clerke Homère."
From Dickens himself, I never heard much mention of the school described here; however, I knew that, besides being the topic of Household Words, it inspired some of the lighter aspects of Salem House in Copperfield. Dickens often referred to the fact that one of its tutors later taught a boy of our mutual friend Macready as an example of his favorite theory about how small the world is and how people and situations that seem most unlikely to intersect frequently do. His use of his schoolmate Tobin as his amanuensis dates back to his days at Doctors' Commons, but both of my correspondents seem mistaken in thinking that Tobin had previously been his fellow-clerk at the same attorney's office. I had thought it more likely that he had gone there with another childhood friend, Mr. Mitton, who later became a solicitor. Neither of my correspondents mentioned him in relation to the school, but I often saw him with Dickens in later years, and Dickens held him in high regard due to their early friendship. However, I’ve since discovered my own error: it turns out that this gentleman’s connection was not with the Wellington Academy but with a school run by Mr. Dawson on Hunter Street, Brunswick Square, where Dickens’s brothers were later enrolled. I believe they were also together for a brief time at Mr. Molloy’s in New Square, Lincoln’s Inn; but regardless of whether that was the case, Dickens certainly hadn’t left school long before his father used his connections to secure him regular work at the office of an attorney in Gray’s Inn, Mr. Edward Blackmore. Thanks to this gentleman, we have our only reliable glimpse of Dickens as a clerk, which he described briefly and, I believe, authentically, detailing the services he provided in that role. It wouldn’t be fair to say those services were remarkable, although it might be hard to find a more distinguished individual who held the title, unless we consider the very father of literature himself, whom Chaucer humorously refers to as “that conceited clerke Homère.”
"I was well acquainted," writes Mr. Edward Blackmore of Alresford, "with his parents, and, being then in practice in Gray's Inn, they asked me if I could find employment for him. He was a bright, clever-looking youth, and I took him as a clerk. He came to me in[88] May, 1827, and left in November, 1828; and I have now an account-book which he used to keep of petty disbursements in the office, in which he charged himself with the modest salary first of thirteen shillings and sixpence, and afterwards of fifteen shillings, a week. Several incidents took place in the office of which he must have been a keen observer, as I recognized some of them in his Pickwick and Nickleby; and I am much mistaken if some of his characters had not their originals in persons I well remember. His taste for theatricals was much promoted by a fellow-clerk named Potter, since dead, with whom he chiefly associated. They took every opportunity, then unknown to me, of going together to a minor theatre, where (I afterwards heard) they not unfrequently engaged in parts. After he left me I saw him at times in the lord chancellor's court, taking notes of cases as a reporter. I then lost sight of him until his Pickwick made its appearance." This letter indicates the position he held at Mr. Blackmore's; and we have but to turn to the passage in Pickwick which describes the several grades of attorney's clerk, to understand it more clearly. He was very far below the articled clerk, who has paid a premium and is attorney in perspective. He was not so high as the salaried clerk, with nearly the whole of his weekly thirty shillings spent on his personal pleasures. He was not even on the level with his middle-aged copying-clerk, always needy and uniformly shabby. He was simply among, however his own nature may have lifted him above, the "office-lads in their first surtouts, who feel a befitting contempt for boys at day-schools, club as they go home at night for saveloys and porter, and[89] think there's nothing like life." Thus far, not more or less, had he now reached. He was one of the office-lads, and probably in his first surtout.
"I was well acquainted," writes Mr. Edward Blackmore of Alresford, "with his parents, and, since I was then practicing in Gray's Inn, they asked me if I could help him find a job. He was a bright, smart-looking young man, so I took him on as a clerk. He joined me in[88] May 1827 and left in November 1828; I still have an account book he used for recording small expenses in the office, where he listed his modest salary of first thirteen shillings and sixpence, and later fifteen shillings, per week. Several incidents occurred in the office that he must have been keenly aware of, as I recognized some of them in his Pickwick and Nickleby; I would be very surprised if some of his characters didn't have their originals in people I clearly remember. His interest in theater was strongly encouraged by a fellow clerk named Potter, who has since passed away, and they often hung out together. They took every chance, which I was not aware of at the time, to visit a smaller theater where (I later heard) they frequently took on roles. After he left my employ, I saw him occasionally in the Lord Chancellor's court, taking notes on cases as a reporter. I then lost track of him until his Pickwick was published." This letter shows the position he held at Mr. Blackmore's office; to understand it better, we only need to refer to the section in Pickwick that describes the different levels of attorney's clerk. He was well below the articled clerk, who has paid a premium and is on the path to becoming an attorney. He wasn't as high as the salaried clerk, who spent almost all of his weekly thirty shillings on personal enjoyment. He wasn't even on par with the middle-aged copying clerk, who was always broke and consistently shabby. He was simply one of, regardless of how his nature may have elevated him, the "office lads in their first coats, who look down on boys at day schools, grab tubas on their way home at night, and think there's nothing better than life." At this point, he had reached no more, no less. He was one of the office lads, probably in his first coat.
But, even thus, the process of education went on, defying what seemed to interrupt it; and in the amount of his present equipment for his needs of life, what he brought from the Wellington House Academy can have borne but the smallest proportion to his acquirement at Mr. Blackmore's. Yet to seek to identify, without help from himself, any passages in his books with those boyish law-experiences, would be idle and hopeless enough. In the earliest of his writings, and down to the very latest, he worked exhaustively the field which is opened by an attorney's office to a student of life and manners; but we have not now to deal with his numerous varieties of the genus clerk drawn thus for the amusement of others, but with the acquisitions which at present he was storing up for himself from the opportunities such offices opened to him. Nor would it be possible to have better illustrative comment on all these years than is furnished by his father's reply to a friend it was now hoped to interest on his behalf, which more than once I have heard him whimsically, but good-humoredly, imitate. "Pray, Mr. Dickens, where was your son educated?" "Why, indeed, sir—ha! ha!—he may be said to have educated himself!" Of the two kinds of education which Gibbon says that all men who rise above the common level receive,—the first, that of his teachers, and the second, more personal and more important, his own,—he had the advantage only of the last. It nevertheless sufficed for him.[90]
But even so, the process of education continued, overcoming any interruptions; and in terms of what he had for his current needs in life, what he brought from Wellington House Academy was only a small part of what he gained at Mr. Blackmore's. However, trying to connect specific moments in his books with those boyhood legal experiences without any help from himself would be pointless and futile. From his earliest writings to his most recent ones, he thoroughly explored the insights provided by an attorney's office for a student of life and society; but our focus isn’t on the many types of clerks he created for others’ amusement, but rather on the knowledge he was currently gathering for himself from the opportunities those offices offered him. Furthermore, there's no better illustration of all these years than his father's response to a friend who was now hoped to be interested in him, which I’ve heard him imitate whimsically but good-naturedly more than once. "Please, Mr. Dickens, where was your son educated?" "Well, sir—ha! ha!—you could say he educated himself!" Of the two kinds of education that Gibbon claims all men who rise above the ordinary receive—the first from teachers, and the second, which is more personal and more important, his own—he benefited only from the latter. Yet it was more than enough for him.[90]
Very nearly another eighteen months were now to be spent mainly in practical preparation for what he was, at this time, led finally to choose as an employment from which a fair income was certain with such talents as he possessed; his father already having taken to it, in these latter years, in aid of the family resources. In his father's house, which was at Hampstead through the first portion of the Mornington Street school time, then in the house out of Seymour Street mentioned by Dr. Danson, and afterwards, upon the elder Dickens going into the gallery, in Bentinck Street, Manchester Square, Charles had continued to live; and, influenced doubtless by the example before him, he took sudden determination to qualify himself thoroughly for what his father was lately become, a newspaper parliamentary reporter. He set resolutely, therefore, to the study of short-hand; and, for the additional help of such general information about books as a fairly-educated youth might be expected to have, as well as to satisfy some higher personal cravings, he became an assiduous attendant in the British Museum reading-room. He would frequently refer to these days as decidedly the usefulest to himself he had ever passed; and, judging from the results, they must have been so. No man who knew him in later years, and talked to him familiarly of books and things, would have suspected his education in boyhood, almost entirely self-acquired as it was, to have been so rambling or hap-hazard as I have here described it. The secret consisted in this, that, whatever for the time he had to do, he lifted himself, there and then, to the level of, and at no time disregarded the rules that guided the hero of his novel. "Whatever[91] I have tried to do in life, I have tried with all my heart to do well. What I have devoted myself to, I have devoted myself to completely. Never to put one hand to anything on which I could throw my whole self, and never to affect depreciation of my work, whatever it was, I find now to have been my golden rules."
Almost another eighteen months were spent mostly getting ready for what he ultimately chose as a career that promised a decent income based on his skills; his father had already taken it up in recent years to help the family finances. Charles lived in his father's house in Hampstead during the first part of his time at Mornington Street school, then in the house outside Seymour Street mentioned by Dr. Danson, and later, when his father moved to the gallery, in Bentinck Street, Manchester Square. Influenced by his father's example, he decided to thoroughly prepare himself to become a newspaper parliamentary reporter. So, he committed himself to studying shorthand, and to gain additional general knowledge about books, which a well-educated young man should have, as well as to satisfy his own intellectual curiosity, he became a regular visitor to the British Museum reading room. He often referred to this period as the most beneficial time of his life, and judging by the results, it certainly was. No one who knew him later and chatted with him about books and various topics would have guessed that his childhood education was almost entirely self-taught and as scattered as I've described. The secret was that, no matter what he was doing at the time, he pushed himself to meet the standards he held in high regard, never ignoring the rules that guided the hero of his novel. "Whatever I have tried to do in life, I have tried with all my heart to do well. What I have committed to, I have committed to fully. I made it a golden rule never to do anything halfway and never to undervalue my work, whatever it was."
Of the difficulties that beset his short-hand studies, as well as of what first turned his mind to them, he has told also something in Copperfield. He had heard that many men distinguished in various pursuits had begun life by reporting the debates in parliament, and he was not deterred by a friend's warning that the mere mechanical accomplishment for excellence in it might take a few years to master thoroughly; "a perfect and entire command of the mystery of short-hand writing and reading being about equal in difficulty to the mastery of six languages." Undaunted, he plunged into it, self-teaching in this as in graver things, and, having bought Mr. Gurney's half-guinea book, worked steadily his way through its distractions. "The changes that were rung upon dots, which in such a position meant such a thing, and in such another position something else entirely different; the wonderful vagaries that were played by circles; the unaccountable consequences that resulted from marks like flies' legs; the tremendous effects of a curve in a wrong place; not only troubled my waking hours, but reappeared before me in my sleep. When I had groped my way, blindly, through these difficulties, and had mastered the alphabet, there then appeared a procession of new horrors, called arbitrary characters; the most despotic characters I have ever[92] known; who insisted, for instance, that a thing like the beginning of a cobweb meant expectation, and that a pen-and-ink sky-rocket stood for disadvantageous. When I had fixed these wretches in my mind, I found that they had driven everything else out of it; then, beginning again, I forgot them; while I was picking them up, I dropped the other fragments of the system: in short, it was almost heart-breaking."
He has mentioned some of the challenges he faced during his shorthand studies, as well as what initially drew him to them, in Copperfield. He learned that many successful people in various fields started their careers by reporting debates in parliament, and he wasn't discouraged by a friend's warning that mastering the skill could take several years. "Achieving a complete and thorough understanding of shorthand writing and reading is about as challenging as mastering six languages." Undeterred, he dove into it, teaching himself as he had with other serious subjects, and after buying Mr. Gurney's half-guinea book, he diligently worked through its complexities. "The changes that came from dots, where one position meant one thing and another position meant something completely different; the strange quirks created by circles; the bizarre results from marks that looked like flies' legs; the serious consequences of a curve in the wrong spot—not only troubled my waking hours but also invaded my sleep. Once I blindly navigated these difficulties and mastered the alphabet, I encountered a whole new set of challenges called arbitrary characters; the most oppressive characters I’ve ever known. They demanded that a shape resembling the start of a cobweb meant expectation, and that a pen-and-ink firework symbolized disadvantage. After I managed to memorize these tricky symbols, I found they had pushed everything else out of my mind; then, starting over, I forgot them. While I was trying to grasp them again, I dropped other parts of the system: in short, it was almost devastating."
What it was that made it not quite heart-breaking to the hero of the fiction, its readers know; and something of the same kind was now to enter into the actual experience of its writer. First let me say, however, that after subduing to his wants in marvelously quick time this unruly and unaccommodating servant of stenography, what he most desired was still not open to him. "There never was such a short-hand writer," has been often said to me by Mr. Beard, the friend he first made in that line when he entered the gallery, and with whom to the close of his life he maintained the friendliest intercourse. But there was no opening for him in the gallery yet. He had to pass nearly two years as a reporter for one of the offices in Doctors' Commons, practicing in this and the other law courts, before he became a sharer in parliamentary toils and triumphs; and what sustained his young hero through something of the same sort of trial was also his own support. He too had his Dora, at apparently the same hopeless elevation; striven for as the one only thing to be attained, and even more unattainable, for neither did he succeed nor happily did she die; but the one idol, like the other, supplying a motive to exertion for the time, and otherwise opening out to the idolater,[93] both in fact and fiction, a highly unsubstantial, happy, foolish time. I used to laugh and tell him I had no belief in any but the book Dora, until the incident of a sudden reappearance of the real one in his life, nearly six years after Copperfield was written, convinced me there had been a more actual foundation for those chapters of his book than I was ready to suppose. Still, I would hardly admit it, and, that the matter could possibly affect him then, persisted in a stout refusal to believe. His reply (1855) throws a little light on this juvenile part of his career, and I therefore venture to preserve it:
What made it not completely heart-breaking for the hero of the story, the readers know; and something similar was about to affect the actual experience of its writer. First, let me say that after quickly getting this unruly and unhelpful stenographer to meet his needs, what he most wanted was still not available to him. "There never was such a shorthand writer," Mr. Beard often said to me. He was the friend he first made in that field when he entered the gallery, and they remained close friends until the end of his life. But there wasn’t a position for him in the gallery yet. He had to spend almost two years working as a reporter for one of the offices in Doctors' Commons, practicing in various law courts, before he shared in the struggles and successes of parliament. What kept the young hero going through a similar trial was his own resolve. He too had his Dora, seemingly at the same impossible height; pursued as the one thing he wanted to achieve, and even more unreachable, as he neither succeeded nor tragically lost her; but that one idol, like the other, provided a reason to strive for a time, otherwise leading the idolater, [93] both in reality and fiction, to a highly fleeting, happy, foolish time. I used to laugh and tell him I didn’t believe in anyone but the book Dora, until a sudden reappearance of the real one in his life, nearly six years after Copperfield was written, convinced me there was a more real basis for those chapters of his book than I was willing to accept. Still, I would hardly admit it, and insisted on a firm refusal to believe that it could possibly affect him then. His reply (1855) sheds some light on this early part of his career, and I therefore feel it’s worth keeping:
"I don't quite apprehend what you mean by my overrating the strength of the feeling of five-and-twenty years ago. If you mean of my own feeling, and will only think what the desperate intensity of my nature is, and that this began when I was Charley's age; that it excluded every other idea from my mind for four years, at a time of life when four years are equal to four times four; and that I went at it with a determination to overcome all the difficulties, which fairly lifted me up into that newspaper life, and floated me away over a hundred men's heads; then you are wrong, because nothing can exaggerate that. I have positively stood amazed at myself ever since!—And so I suffered, and so worked, and so beat and hammered away at the maddest romances that ever got into any boy's head and stayed there, that to see the mere cause of it all, now, loosens my hold upon myself. Without for a moment sincerely believing that it would have been better if we had never got separated, I cannot see the occasion of so much emotion as I should see any one else. No one[94] can imagine in the most distant degree what pain the recollection gave me in Copperfield. And, just as I can never open that book as I open any other book, I cannot see the face (even at four-and-forty), or hear the voice, without going wandering away over the ashes of all that youth and hope in the wildest manner." More and more plainly seen, however, in the light of four-and-forty, the romance glided visibly away, its work being fairly done; and at the close of the month following that in which this letter was written, during which he had very quietly made a formal call with his wife at his youthful Dora's house, and contemplated with a calm equanimity, in the hall, her stuffed favorite Jip, he began the fiction in which there was a Flora to set against its predecessor's Dora, both derived from the same original. The fancy had a comic humor in it he found it impossible to resist, but it was kindly and pleasant to the last;[6] and if the later picture showed[95] him plenty to laugh at in this retrospect of his youth, there was nothing he thought of more tenderly than the earlier, as long as he was conscious of anything.
"I don't really understand what you mean by me exaggerating the strength of the feelings from twenty-five years ago. If you’re talking about my own feelings and considering how intense my nature is—how it all started when I was Charley's age; that it consumed my thoughts for four years, during a time when four years feels like a lifetime; and that I tackled it with a determination that lifted me into that newspaper life and carried me over a hundred people's heads—then you're mistaken because nothing can exaggerate that. I've actually been amazed at myself ever since! I suffered, I worked hard, and I tirelessly beat away at the wildest fantasies that ever entered a boy's mind and stuck there, and just to see the cause of it all now makes me lose my grip on myself. Without sincerely believing that things would have been better if we had never separated, I can't understand the level of emotion I would expect from anyone else. No one can even imagine how much pain the memories caused me in Copperfield. Just like I can't pick up that book the same way I do with any other book, I can't see that face (even now at forty-four) or hear that voice without being taken back to the ashes of all that youth and hope in an overwhelming way." However, more clearly seen through the lens of being forty-four, the romance faded away as its purpose was fulfilled; and at the end of the month after this letter was written, during which he had quietly made a formal visit with his wife to his youthful Dora's house and calmly observed her stuffed pet Jip in the hallway, he started a new story featuring a Flora to contrast with Dora from before, both inspired by the same original. He found the whimsical humor in it impossible to resist, and it was kind and enjoyable to the end; and if the later depiction allowed him to find plenty to laugh at when reflecting on his youth, nothing was more tender in his thoughts than the earlier one, as long as he was aware of anything.
CHAPTER IV.
REPORTERS' GALLERY AND NEWSPAPER LITERATURE.
1831-1835.
Dickens was nineteen years old when at last he entered the gallery. His father, with whom he still lived in Bentinck Street, had already, as we have seen, joined the gallery as a reporter for one of the morning papers, and was now in the more comfortable circumstances derived from the addition to his official pension which this praiseworthy labor insured; but his own engagement on the Chronicle dates somewhat later. His first parliamentary service was given to the True Sun, a journal which had then on its editorial staff some dear friends of mine, through whom I became myself a contributor to it, and afterwards, in common with all concerned, whether in its writing, reporting, printing, or publishing, a sharer in its difficulties. The most formidable of these arrived one day in a general strike of the reporters; and I well remember noticing at this[97] dread time, on the staircase of the magnificent mansion we were lodged in, a young man of my own age, whose keen animation of look would have arrested attention anywhere, and whose name, upon inquiry, I then for the first time heard. It was coupled with the fact, which gave it interest even then, that "young Dickens" had been spokesman for the recalcitrant reporters, and conducted their case triumphantly. He was afterwards during two sessions engaged for the Mirror of Parliament, which one of his uncles by the mother's side originated and conducted; and finally, in his twenty-third year, he became a reporter for the Morning Chronicle.
Dickens was nineteen when he finally entered the gallery. His father, who he still lived with on Bentinck Street, had already joined the gallery as a reporter for one of the morning papers and was now in a more comfortable situation thanks to the additional income from this commendable work added to his official pension; however, Dickens' own work at the Chronicle came a bit later. His first parliamentary job was with the True Sun, a publication that had some close friends of mine on its editorial team, through whom I also became a contributor. Eventually, like everyone involved—be it writing, reporting, printing, or publishing—I shared in its challenges. The most daunting of these challenges came one day during a general strike of the reporters. I distinctly remember noticing a young man my age on the staircase of the grand building we were in. His lively presence would catch anyone's attention, and it was then that I first heard his name. It was noted, which made it interesting even then, that "young Dickens" had been the spokesperson for the rebellious reporters and successfully handled their case. He was later employed for two sessions by the Mirror of Parliament, a publication started and run by one of his maternal uncles, and finally, by the age of twenty-three, he became a reporter for the Morning Chronicle.
A step far more momentous to him (though then he did not know it) he had taken shortly before. In the December number for 1833 of what then was called the Old Monthly Magazine, his first published piece of writing had seen the light. He has described himself dropping this paper (Mr. Minns and his Cousin, as he afterwards entitled it, but which appeared in the magazine as A Dinner at Poplar Walk) stealthily one evening at twilight, with fear and trembling, into a dark letter-box in a dark office up a dark court in Fleet Street; and he has told his agitation when it appeared in all the glory of print: "On which occasion I walked down to Westminster Hall, and turned into it for half an hour, because my eyes were so dimmed with joy and pride that they could not bear the street, and were not fit to be seen there." He had purchased the magazine at a shop in the Strand; and exactly two years afterwards, in the younger member of a publishing firm who had called, at the chambers in Furnival's[98] Inn to which he had moved soon after entering the gallery, with the proposal that originated Pickwick, he recognized the person he had bought that magazine from, and whom before or since he had never seen.
A much more significant step for him (though he didn't realize it at the time) happened shortly before. In the December 1833 issue of what was then called the Old Monthly Magazine, his first published piece saw the light of day. He described how he nervously dropped this paper (which he later titled Mr. Minns and his Cousin, but which appeared in the magazine as A Dinner at Poplar Walk) one evening at twilight into a dark letterbox in a dark office down a dark alley in Fleet Street. He recounted his excitement when it came out in print: "On that occasion, I walked down to Westminster Hall and stayed there for half an hour because my eyes were so filled with joy and pride that they couldn't handle the street and weren't fit to be seen there." He had bought the magazine from a shop in the Strand, and exactly two years later, he recognized the younger member of a publishing firm who had come to the chambers in Furnival's[98] Inn where he had moved shortly after starting in the gallery, with the proposal that led to Pickwick. He realized it was the same person he had bought that magazine from and whom he had never seen before or since.
This interval of two years more than comprised what remained of his career in the gallery and the engagements connected with it; but that this occupation was of the utmost importance in its influence on his life, in the discipline of his powers as well as of his character, there can be no doubt whatever. "To the wholesome training of severe newspaper work, when I was a very young man, I constantly refer my first successes," he said to the New York editors when he last took leave of them. It opened to him a wide and varied range of experience, which his wonderful observation, exact as it was humorous, made entirely his own. He saw the last of the old coaching-days, and of the old inns that were a part of them; but it will be long before the readers of his living page see the last of the life of either. "There never was," he once wrote to me (in 1845), "anybody connected with newspapers who, in the same space of time, had so much express and post-chaise experience as I. And what gentlemen they were to serve, in such things, at the old Morning Chronicle! Great or small it did not matter. I have had to charge for half a dozen break-downs in half a dozen times as many miles. I have had to charge for the damage of a great-coat from the drippings of a blazing wax candle, in writing through the smallest hours of the night in a swift-flying carriage-and-pair. I have had to charge for all sorts of breakages fifty times in a journey without question, such being the ordinary results of the pace which[99] we went at. I have charged for broken hats, broken luggage, broken chaises, broken harness—everything but a broken head, which is the only thing they would have grumbled to pay for."
This two-year period made up what was left of his career in the gallery and the related engagements; but there's no doubt that this work had a huge impact on his life, shaping both his skills and his character. "I always credit my early successes to the valuable training I received from tough newspaper work when I was very young," he told the New York editors when he last said goodbye to them. It opened up a wide and varied range of experiences, which his keen and humorous observations made uniquely his own. He witnessed the end of the old coaching days and the inns that were part of that era; however, it will be a long time before readers of his alive writing see the last of either. "No one in newspapers ever had so much experience with express and post-chaise travel in such a short time as I did," he once wrote to me (in 1845). "And what gentlemen they were to work with at the old Morning Chronicle! It didn't matter if they were great or small. I had to charge for half a dozen breakdowns over the same number of miles. I even had to charge for damages to a great coat from the drippings of a blazing wax candle while writing during the small hours of the night in a fast-moving carriage and pair. I charged for all sorts of damages fifty times on one trip without question, as those were the usual results of the pace we went at. I charged for broken hats, broken luggage, broken carriages, broken harness—everything except for a broken head, which is the only thing they would have complained about paying for."
Something to the same effect he said publicly twenty years later, on the occasion of his presiding, in May, 1865, at the second annual dinner of the Newspaper Press Fund, when he condensed within the compass of his speech a summary of the whole of his reporting life. "I am not here," he said, "advocating the case of a mere ordinary client of whom I have little or no knowledge. I hold a brief to-night for my brothers. I went into the gallery of the House of Commons as a parliamentary reporter when I was a boy, and I left it—I can hardly believe the inexorable truth—nigh thirty years ago. I have pursued the calling of a reporter under circumstances of which many of my brethren here can form no adequate conception. I have often transcribed for the printer, from my short-hand notes, important public speeches in which the strictest accuracy was required, and a mistake in which would have been to a young man severely compromising, writing on the palm of my hand, by the light of a dark-lantern, in a post-chaise and four, galloping through a wild country, and through the dead of the night, at the then surprising rate of fifteen miles an hour. The very last time I was at Exeter, I strolled into the castle-yard there, to identify, for the amusement of a friend, the spot on which I once 'took,' as we used to call it, an election-speech of Lord John Russell at the Devon contest, in the midst of a lively fight maintained by all the vagabonds in that division of the county, and under such a pelting rain[100] that I remember two good-natured colleagues, who chanced to be at leisure, held a pocket-handkerchief over my note-book, after the manner of a state canopy in an ecclesiastical procession. I have worn my knees by writing on them on the old back row of the old gallery of the old House of Commons; and I have worn my feet by standing to write in a preposterous pen in the old House of Lords, where we used to be huddled together like so many sheep,—kept in waiting, say, until the woolsack might want restuffing. Returning home from exciting political meetings in the country to the waiting press in London, I do verily believe I have been upset in almost every description of vehicle known in this country. I have been, in my time, belated on miry by-roads, towards the small hours, forty or fifty miles from London, in a wheelless carriage, with exhausted horses and drunken post-boys, and have got back in time for publication, to be received with never-forgotten compliments by the late Mr. Black, coming in the broadest of Scotch from the broadest of hearts I ever knew. These trivial things I mention as an assurance to you that I never have forgotten the fascination of that old pursuit. The pleasure that I used to feel in the rapidity and dexterity of its exercise has never faded out of my breast. Whatever little cunning of hand or head I took to it, or acquired in it, I have so retained as that I fully believe I could resume it to-morrow, very little the worse from long disuse. To this present year of my life, when I sit in this hall, or where not, hearing a dull speech (the phenomenon does occur), I sometimes beguile the tedium of the moment by mentally following the speaker in the old, old way; and sometimes,[101] if you can believe me, I even find my hand going on the table-cloth, taking an imaginary note of it all." The latter I have known him do frequently. It was indeed a quite ordinary habit with him.
Something similar to this he said publicly twenty years later, when he was presiding over the second annual dinner of the Newspaper Press Fund in May 1865, summarizing his entire reporting career in his speech. "I'm not here," he said, "to advocate for just an ordinary client I know little about. Tonight, I'm representing my fellow reporters. I started as a parliamentary reporter when I was a kid, and I can hardly believe it was nearly thirty years ago that I left the House of Commons. I’ve worked as a reporter under conditions most of my colleagues here can't even imagine. I’ve often prepared important public speeches for printing from my shorthand notes, where accuracy was crucial, and any mistake could be seriously compromising for a young man. I would write on the palm of my hand, using a dark lantern light, while racing through rough countryside at fifteen miles an hour in a post-chaise. The last time I visited Exeter, I wandered into the castle yard to point out to a friend the spot where I once took notes of an election speech by Lord John Russell during a lively contest, while all sorts of characters were around, and it was pouring rain so hard that two good-natured colleagues, who happened to be around, held a handkerchief over my notebook like a canopy at a religious procession. I’ve worn my knees down writing on them from the old back row of the gallery in the old House of Commons, and my feet are tired from standing to write in the cramped space of the old House of Lords, where we were packed together like sheep, just waiting for the woolsack to be restuffed. Coming home from exciting political rallies in the country to the press in London, I genuinely believe I’ve been in almost every type of vehicle known in this country. I’ve been delayed on muddy backroads late at night, forty or fifty miles from London, stuck in a carriage without wheels, with tired horses and drunken post-boys, and still made it back in time for the papers, receiving unforgettable compliments from the late Mr. Black, who spoke in the broadest of Scots from the kindest heart I ever knew. I mention these trivial things to assure you that I’ve never forgotten the allure of that old profession. The enjoyment I felt from its quickness and skill hasn’t faded from my heart. Whatever skills I picked up then, I believe I could take up again tomorrow without much trouble from the time away. Even now, when I sit in this hall or elsewhere, listening to a dull speech (which does happen), I sometimes pass the time by mentally following the speaker like I used to; and sometimes, believe it or not, my hand finds itself moving on the tablecloth, pretending to take notes." This was indeed a very common habit of his.
Mr. James Grant, a writer who was himself in the gallery with Dickens, and who states that among its eighty or ninety reporters he occupied the very highest rank, not merely for accuracy in reporting but for marvelous quickness in transcribing, has lately also told us that while there he was exceedingly reserved in his manners, and that, though showing the usual courtesies to all he was concerned with in his duties, the only personal intimacy he formed was with Mr. Thomas Beard, then too reporting for the Morning Chronicle. I have already mentioned the friendly and familiar relations maintained with this gentleman to the close of his life; and in confirmation of Mr. Grant's statement I can further say that the only other associate of these early reporting days to whom I ever heard him refer with special regard was the late Mr. Vincent Dowling, many years editor of Bell's Life, with whom he did not continue much personal intercourse, but of whose character as well as talents he had formed a very high opinion. Nor is there anything to add to the notice of these days which the reader's fancy may not easily supply. A letter has been kept as written by him while engaged on one of his "expresses;" but it is less for its saying anything new, than for its confirming with a pleasant vividness what has been said already, that its contents will justify mention here.
Mr. James Grant, a writer who was in the gallery with Dickens and who claims he was one of the top reporters among the eighty or ninety present, not only for his accuracy but also for his amazing speed in transcribing, has recently noted that while there he was quite reserved in his demeanor. He showed the usual courtesies to everyone he worked with, but the only personal connection he formed was with Mr. Thomas Beard, who was also reporting for the Morning Chronicle at that time. I've already noted the friendly and familiar relationship he maintained with this gentleman until the end of his life. To support Mr. Grant's statement, I can add that the only other colleague from those early reporting days he ever mentioned with special fondness was the late Mr. Vincent Dowling, who was editor of Bell's Life for many years. Although he didn’t have much personal interaction with Dowling, he held a very high opinion of both his character and his talents. There’s nothing more to add about those days that the reader's imagination can’t easily fill in. A letter has been kept that he wrote while working on one of his “expresses,” but it's included here not because it says anything new, but because it brightly confirms what has already been said.
He writes, on a "Tuesday morning" in May, 1835, from the Bush Inn, Bristol; the occasion that has[102] taken him to the west, connected with a reporting party, being Lord John Russell's Devonshire contest above named, and his associate-chief being Mr. Beard, intrusted with command for the Chronicle in this particular express. He expects to forward "the conclusion of Russell's dinner" by Cooper's company's coach leaving the Bush at half-past six next morning; and by the first Ball's coach on Thursday morning he will forward the report of the Bath dinner, indorsing the parcel for immediate delivery, with extra rewards for the porter. Beard is to go over to Bath next morning. He is himself to come back by the mail from Marlborough; he has no doubt, if Lord John makes a speech of any ordinary dimensions, it can be done by the time Marlborough is reached; "and taking into consideration the immense importance of having the addition of saddle-horses from thence, it is, beyond all doubt, worth an effort. . . . I need not say," he continues, "that it will be sharp work and will require two of us; for we shall both be up the whole of the previous night, and shall have to sit up all night again to get it off in time." He adds that as soon as they have had a little sleep they will return to town as quickly as they can; but they have, if the express succeeds, to stop at sundry places along the road to pay money and notify satisfaction. And so, for himself and Beard, he is his editor's very sincerely.
He writes on a "Tuesday morning" in May 1835 from the Bush Inn in Bristol. The reason he's gone west is connected to a reporting assignment, specifically for Lord John Russell's Devonshire election, with Mr. Beard as his main associate in charge for the Chronicle on this particular trip. He plans to send "the conclusion of Russell's dinner" via Cooper's company coach, leaving the Bush at 6:30 the next morning. By the first Ball's coach on Thursday morning, he will also send the report of the Bath dinner, marking the parcel for immediate delivery and offering extra tips for the porter. Beard will head over to Bath the next morning, while he himself will return by mail from Marlborough. He is confident that if Lord John gives a speech of any reasonable length, it can be completed by the time they reach Marlborough. "Considering how crucial it is to have saddle-horses from there, it’s definitely worth the effort. . . . I don’t need to mention," he continues, "that this will be a tight schedule and will require both of us; we’ll be awake the entire previous night and will have to stay up again to get it done on time." He adds that as soon as they catch a bit of sleep, they'll return to town as quickly as possible, but if the express goes well, they'll need to stop at various locations along the way to make payments and confirm satisfaction. And so, on behalf of himself and Beard, he sends his best regards to his editor.
Another anecdote of these reporting days, with its sequel, may be added from his own alleged relation, in which, however, mistakes occur that it seems strange he should have made. The story, as told, is that the late Lord Derby, when Mr. Stanley, had on some important[103] occasion made a speech which all the reporters found it necessary greatly to abridge; that its essential points had nevertheless been so well given in the Chronicle that Mr. Stanley, having need of it for himself in greater detail, had sent a request to the reporter to meet him in Carlton House Terrace and take down the entire speech; that Dickens attended and did the work accordingly, much to Mr. Stanley's satisfaction; and that, on his dining with Mr. Gladstone in recent years, and finding the aspect of the dining-room strangely familiar, he discovered afterwards on inquiry that it was there he had taken the speech. The story, as it actually occurred, is connected with the brief life of the Mirror of Parliament. It was not at any special desire of Mr. Stanley's, but for that new record of the debates, which had been started by one of the uncles of Dickens and professed to excel Hansard in giving verbatim reports, that the famous speech against O'Connell was taken as described. The young reporter went to the room in Carlton Terrace because the work of his uncle Barrow's publication required to be done there; and if, in later years, the great author was in the same room as the guest of the prime minister, it must have been but a month or two before he died, when for the first time he visited and breakfasted with Mr. Gladstone.
Another story from those reporting days, along with its follow-up, can be shared from his own supposed account, though there are some errors in it that seem odd for him to have made. The tale goes that the late Lord Derby, when he was Mr. Stanley, gave a significant speech on an important occasion that all the reporters needed to summarize heavily; however, its key points were so well presented in the Chronicle that Mr. Stanley, needing the full details for himself, asked the reporter to meet him at Carlton House Terrace to record the entire speech. Dickens attended and did the work, much to Mr. Stanley’s satisfaction. Later, when he dined with Mr. Gladstone in more recent years and found the dining room oddly familiar, he later discovered upon asking that it was there he had recorded the speech. The actual event relates to the short life of the Mirror of Parliament. It wasn’t by Mr. Stanley's particular request, but rather for that new record of debates, which had been initiated by one of Dickens's uncles and claimed to surpass Hansard in providing verbatim reports, that the notable speech against O'Connell was taken as described. The young reporter went to the room in Carlton Terrace because his uncle Barrow’s publication needed that work done there; and if, in later years, the famous author was in the same room as the Prime Minister’s guest, it must have been just a month or two before he passed away when he first visited and had breakfast with Mr. Gladstone.
The mention of his career in the gallery may close with the incident. I will only add that his observation while there had not led him to form any high opinion of the House of Commons or its heroes, and that of the Pickwickian sense which so often takes the place of common sense in our legislature he omitted no[104] opportunity of declaring his contempt at every part of his life.
The mention of his career in the gallery might wrap up with the incident. I'll just add that his time spent there didn't make him think highly of the House of Commons or its figures, and he took every chance to express his disdain for the Pickwickian mindset that often replaces common sense in our government throughout every part of his life.
The other occupation had meanwhile not been lost sight of, and for this we are to go back a little. Since the first sketch appeared in the Monthly Magazine, nine others have enlivened the pages of later numbers of the same magazine, the last in February, 1835, and that which appeared in the preceding August having first had the signature of Boz. This was the nickname of a pet child, his youngest brother Augustus, whom in honor of the Vicar of Wakefield he had dubbed Moses, which being facetiously pronounced through the nose became Boses, and being shortened became Boz. "Boz was a very familiar household word to me, long before I was an author, and so I came to adopt it." Thus had he fully invented his Sketches by Boz before they were even so called, or any one was ready to give much attention to them; and the next invention needful to himself was some kind of payment in return for them. The magazine was owned as well as conducted at this time by a Mr. Holland, who had come back from Bolivar's South American campaigns with the rank of captain, and had hoped to make it a popular mouthpiece for his ardent liberalism. But this hope, as well as his own health, quite failed; and he had sorrowfully to decline receiving any more of the sketches when they had to cease as voluntary offerings. I do not think that either he or the magazine lived many weeks after an evening I passed with him in Doughty Street in 1837, when he spoke in a very touching way of the failure of this and other enterprises of his life, and of the help that Dickens had been to him.[105]
The other job hadn’t been forgotten in the meantime, so let’s rewind a bit. Since the first sketch was published in the Monthly Magazine, nine more have brightened the pages of later issues of the same magazine, the latest being in February 1835, and the one from the previous August was signed by Boz for the first time. This was a nickname for his youngest brother Augustus, whom he playfully named Moses in honor of the Vicar of Wakefield. Pronounced through the nose, it morphed into Boses, and then got shortened to Boz. "Boz was a common name in my household long before I became an author, so I decided to use it." He had completely created his Sketches by Boz before they were officially named or anyone gave them much attention; what he still needed was some sort of payment for them. At that time, the magazine was owned and run by Mr. Holland, who had returned from Bolivar’s South American campaigns with the rank of captain and had hoped to make it a popular voice for his passionate liberalism. Unfortunately, that hope, along with his health, faded; he sadly had to stop accepting any more sketches when they could no longer be offered voluntarily. I don't think either he or the magazine survived long after an evening I spent with him in Doughty Street in 1837, when he spoke very movingly about the failures of this and other projects in his life, and of how much help Dickens had been to him.[105]
Nothing thus being forthcoming from the Monthly, it was of course but natural the sketches too should cease to be forthcoming; and, even before the above-named February number appeared, a new opening had been found for them. An evening offshoot to the Morning Chronicle had been lately in hand; and to a countryman of Black's engaged in the preparations for it, Mr. George Hogarth, Dickens was communicating from his rooms in Furnival's Inn, on the evening of Tuesday, the 20th of January, 1835, certain hopes and fancies he had formed. This was the beginning of his knowledge of an accomplished and kindly man, with whose family his relations were soon to become so intimate as to have an influence on all his future career. Mr. Hogarth had asked him, as a favor to himself, to write an original sketch for the first number of the enterprise, and in writing back to say with what readiness he should comply, and how anxiously he should desire to do his best for the person who had made the request, he mentioned what had arisen in his mind. It had occurred to him that he might not be unreasonably or improperly trespassing farther on Mr. Hogarth if, trusting to his kindness to refer the application to the proper quarter, he begged to ask whether it was probable, if he commenced a regular series of articles under some attractive title for the Evening Chronicle, its conductors would think he had any claim to some additional remuneration (of course, of no great amount) for doing so. In short, he wished to put it to the proprietors—first, whether a continuation of some chapters of light papers in the style of his street-sketches would be considered of use to the new journal; and secondly, if so, whether they[106] would not think it fair and reasonable that, taking his share of the ordinary reporting business of the Chronicle besides, he should receive something for the papers beyond his ordinary salary as a reporter. The request was thought fair, he began the sketches, and his salary was raised from five to seven guineas a week.
Nothing came from the Monthly, so it was only natural that the sketches would stop as well; and even before the February issue came out, a new opportunity had been found for them. An evening edition of the Morning Chronicle was in the works, and Mr. George Hogarth, a colleague of Black's involved in its preparations, was in touch with Dickens from his rooms at Furnival's Inn on the evening of Tuesday, January 20, 1835, sharing some hopes and ideas he had in mind. This marked the beginning of his relationship with a talented and kind man, whose family would soon become closely connected to him, influencing his entire career. Mr. Hogarth had asked Dickens, as a personal favor, to write an original piece for the first issue of the new publication. In his reply, Dickens expressed his eagerness to help the person who made the request and mentioned an idea he had. He thought he might be pushing it by asking Mr. Hogarth, trusting in his goodwill to pass on the question to the right people, whether it would be possible that if he started a regular series of articles under an appealing title for the Evening Chronicle, the editors would consider that he deserved some additional payment (of course, not a huge amount) for doing so. Essentially, he wanted to ask the owners—first, if they would find a continuation of some light articles in the style of his street sketches useful for the new journal; and second, if so, whether they would agree that, in addition to his regular reporting duties for the Chronicle, it would be fair and reasonable for him to receive some extra payment for the articles beyond his typical salary as a reporter. The request was deemed reasonable, he started the sketches, and his salary was increased from five to seven guineas a week.
They went on, with undiminished spirit and freshness, throughout the year; and, much as they were talked of outside as well as in the world of newspapers, nothing in connection with them delighted the writer half so much as the hearty praise of his own editor. Mr. Black is one of the men who has passed without recognition out of a world his labors largely benefited, but with those who knew him no man was so popular, as well for his broad kindly humor as for his honest great-hearted enjoyment of whatever was excellent in others. Dickens to the last remembered that it was most of all the cordial help of this good old mirth-loving man which had started him joyfully on his career of letters. "It was John Black that flung the slipper after me," he would often say. "Dear old Black! my first hearty out-and-out appreciator," is an expression in one of his letters written to me in the year he died.
They continued on with the same energy and enthusiasm throughout the year; and despite all the buzz about them both in the media and beyond, nothing delighted the writer more than the genuine praise from his editor. Mr. Black is one of those individuals who left the world largely unrecognized despite his significant contributions, but among those who knew him, no one was more beloved, thanks to his warm sense of humor and his genuine appreciation for the excellence in others. Dickens always remembered that it was primarily the supportive encouragement of this cheerful old man that joyfully launched him on his writing journey. "It was John Black who threw the slipper after me," he would often say. "Dear old Black! my first true supporter," is a line from one of his letters to me written in the year he passed away.
CHAPTER V.
FIRST BOOK, AND ORIGIN OF PICKWICK.
1836.
The opening of 1836 found him collecting into two volumes the first series of Sketches by Boz, of which he had sold the copyright for a conditional payment of (I think) a hundred and fifty pounds to a young publisher named Macrone, whose acquaintance he had made through Mr. Ainsworth a few weeks before.[7] At this[108] time also, we are told in a letter before quoted, the editorship of the Monthly Magazine having come into Mr. James Grant's hands, this gentleman, applying to him through its previous editor to know if he would again contribute to it, learned two things: the first, that he was going to be married; and the second, that, having entered into an arrangement to write a monthly serial, his duties in future would leave him small spare time. Both pieces of news were soon confirmed. The Times of the 26th of March, 1836, gave notice that on the 31st would be published the first shilling number of the Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club, edited by Boz; and the same journal of a few days later announced that on the 2d of April Mr. Charles Dickens had married Catherine, the eldest daughter of Mr. George Hogarth, whom already we have met as his fellow-worker on the Chronicle. The honeymoon was passed in the neighborhood to which at all times of[109] interest in his life he turned with a strange recurring fondness; and while the young couple are at the quiet little village of Chalk, on the road between Gravesend and Rochester, I will relate exactly the origin of the ever-memorable Mr. Pickwick.
The beginning of 1836 found him putting together two volumes of the first series of Sketches by Boz, for which he had sold the copyright for a conditional payment of (I believe) one hundred and fifty pounds to a young publisher named Macrone, whom he had met through Mr. Ainsworth a few weeks earlier.[7] At this[108] time, as mentioned in a previously quoted letter, Mr. James Grant had taken over the editorship of the Monthly Magazine. He reached out to him through the magazine's former editor to see if he would contribute again and discovered two things: first, that he was about to get married; and second, that since he had agreed to write a monthly serial, he would have little free time going forward. Both pieces of news were quickly confirmed. The Times on March 26, 1836, announced that on March 31, the first shilling issue of the Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club, edited by Boz; would be published, and a few days later, the same newspaper reported that on April 2, Mr. Charles Dickens had married Catherine, the eldest daughter of Mr. George Hogarth, whom we have already met as his colleague at the Chronicle. The honeymoon was spent in the area he always seemed to have a fondness for, and while the young couple were in the charming little village of Chalk, situated between Gravesend and Rochester, I will share the exact origin of the unforgettable Mr. Pickwick.
A young publishing-house had started recently, among other enterprises ingenious rather than important, a Library of Fiction; among the authors they wished to enlist in it was the writer of the sketches in the Monthly; and, to the extent of one paper during the past year, they had effected this through their editor, Mr. Charles Whitehead, a very ingenious and very unfortunate man. "I was not aware," wrote the elder member of the firm to Dickens, thirteen years later, in a letter to which reference was made[8] in the preface to Pickwick in one of his later editions, "that you were writing in the Chronicle, or what your name was; but Whitehead, who was an old Monthly man, recollected it, and got you to write The Tuggs's at Ramsgate."
A young publishing house had recently started, engaging in various creative ventures that were more clever than significant, including a Library of Fiction. Among the authors they aimed to recruit was the writer of the sketches in the Monthly; and, for one issue in the past year, they managed to do this through their editor, Mr. Charles Whitehead, who was an incredibly clever but rather unfortunate man. "I didn't know," wrote the senior partner of the firm to Dickens thirteen years later in a letter that was referenced[8] in the preface to Pickwick in one of its later editions, "that you were writing for the Chronicle, or what your name was; but Whitehead, who had been with the Monthly for a long time, remembered it and got you to write The Tuggs's at Ramsgate."
And now comes another person on the scene. "In November, 1835," continues Mr. Chapman, "we published a little book called the Squib Annual, with plates by Seymour; and it was during my visit to him to see[110] after them that he said he should like to do a series of cockney-sporting plates of a superior sort to those he had already published. I said I thought they might do, if accompanied by letter-press and published in monthly parts; and, this being agreed to, we wrote to the author of Three Courses and a Dessert, and proposed it; but, receiving no answer, the scheme dropped for some months, till Seymour said he wished us to decide, as another job had offered which would fully occupy his time; and it was on this we decided to ask you to do it. Having opened already a connection with you for our Library of Fiction, we naturally applied to you to do the Pickwick; but I do not think we even mentioned our intention to Mr. Seymour, and I am quite sure that from the beginning to the end nobody but yourself had anything whatever to do with it. Our prospectus was out at the end of February, and it had all been arranged before that date."
And now another person joins the story. "In November 1835," Mr. Chapman continues, "we published a little book called the Squib Annual, featuring illustrations by Seymour; and during my visit to him to check on the illustrations[110], he mentioned that he would like to create a series of high-quality cockney-sporting plates, better than the ones he had already released. I thought it could work if we included written content and published it in monthly installments; and after agreeing on this, we contacted the author of Three Courses and a Dessert and proposed the idea. However, we didn't get a response, so the plan was put on hold for a few months, until Seymour asked us to make a decision as another project had come up that would take up all his time; that’s when we decided to ask you to take it on. Since we already had a connection for our Library of Fiction, we naturally approached you for the Pickwick; but I don't believe we even mentioned our intentions to Mr. Seymour, and I'm sure that from start to finish, only you were involved. Our prospectus was released at the end of February, and everything had been organized before that date."
The member of the firm who carried the application to him in Furnival's Inn was not the writer of this letter, but Mr. Hall, who had sold him two years before, not knowing that he was the purchaser, the magazine in which his first effusion was printed; and he has himself described what passed at the interview: "The idea propounded to me was that the monthly something should be a vehicle for certain plates to be executed by Mr. Seymour; and there was a notion, either on the part of that admirable humorous artist, or of my visitor, that a Nimrod Club, the members of which were to go out shooting, fishing, and so forth, and getting themselves into difficulties through their want of dexterity, would be the best means of introducing these.[111] I objected, on consideration that, although born and partly bred in the country, I was no great sportsman, except in regard to all kinds of locomotion; that the idea was not novel, and had already been much used; that it would be infinitely better for the plates to arise naturally out of the text; and that I would like to take my own way, with a freer range of English scenes and people, and was afraid I should ultimately do so in any case, whatever course I might prescribe to myself at starting. My views being deferred to, I thought of Mr. Pickwick, and wrote the first number; from the proof-sheets of which Mr. Seymour made his drawing of the club and his happy portrait of its founder. I connected Mr. Pickwick with a club, because of the original suggestion; and I put in Mr. Winkle expressly for the use of Mr. Seymour."
The person from the firm who brought the application to him at Furnival's Inn wasn't the writer of this letter, but Mr. Hall, who had sold him the magazine where his first piece was published two years earlier, not realizing he was the buyer. He described what happened in their meeting: "The idea presented to me was that the monthly publication would feature certain illustrations by Mr. Seymour; and there was a thought, either from that wonderful humorous artist or my visitor, that a Nimrod Club, where members would go out shooting, fishing, and getting into trouble due to their lack of skill, would be the best way to introduce these.[111] I objected, considering that, although I was born and partly raised in the countryside, I wasn’t a big sportsman, except when it came to various forms of travel; that the idea wasn’t new and had already been used a lot; that it would be far better for the illustrations to come organically from the text; and that I wanted to explore my own style, with a wider range of English settings and characters, and I feared I would eventually do so regardless of any direction I might set for myself at the beginning. My opinions being respected, I thought of Mr. Pickwick and wrote the first issue; from the proof-sheets of which Mr. Seymour created his drawing of the club and his cheerful portrait of its founder. I linked Mr. Pickwick with a club because of the original suggestion, and I included Mr. Winkle specifically for Mr. Seymour’s use."
Mr. Hall was dead when this statement was first made, in the preface to the cheap edition in 1847; but Mr. Chapman clearly recollected his partner's account of the interview, and confirmed every part of it, in his letter of 1849,[9] with one exception. In giving Mr.[112] Seymour credit for the figure by which all the habitable globe knows Mr. Pickwick, and which certainly at the outset helped to make him a reality, it had given the artist too much. The reader will hardly be so startled as I was on coming to the closing line of Mr. Chapman's confirmatory letter: "As this letter is to be historical, I may as well claim what little belongs to me in the matter, and that is the figure of Pickwick. Seymour's first sketch was of a long, thin man. The present immortal one he made from my description of a friend of mine at Richmond, a fat old beau, who would wear, in spite of the ladies' protests, drab tights and black gaiters. His name was John Foster."
Mr. Hall was already dead when this statement was first made in the preface to the cheap edition in 1847; however, Mr. Chapman clearly remembered his partner's account of the interview and confirmed every part of it in his letter from 1849,[9] with one exception. While acknowledging Mr.[112] Seymour for the image that the entire world knows as Mr. Pickwick, which definitely helped solidify his character from the start, it credited the artist a bit too much. The reader will probably not be as surprised as I was when I reached the last line of Mr. Chapman's confirming letter: "Since this letter is meant to be historical, I might as well stake my claim to what little is mine in this matter, and that is the figure of Pickwick. Seymour's first sketch was of a tall, thin man. The iconic version we know today was created based on my description of a friend from Richmond, a heavyset old gentleman who would insist on wearing, despite the ladies' objections, drab tights and black gaiters. His name was John Foster."
On the coincidences, resemblances, and surprises of life, Dickens liked especially to dwell, and few things moved his fancy so pleasantly. The world, he would say, was so much smaller than we thought it; we were all so connected by fate without knowing it; people supposed to be far apart were so constantly elbowing each other; and to-morrow bore so close a resemblance to nothing half so much as to yesterday. Here[113] were the only two leading incidents of his own life before I knew him, his marriage and the first appearance of his Pickwick; and it turned out after all that I had some shadowy association with both. He was married on the anniversary of my birthday, and the original of the figure of Mr. Pickwick bore my name.[10]
On the coincidences, similarities, and surprises of life, Dickens loved to focus on, and few things inspired him so joyfully. The world, he would say, was much smaller than we realized; we were all connected by fate without even knowing it; people we thought were far apart were often brushing against each other; and tomorrow resembled nothing as much as yesterday did. Here[113] were the two most significant events of his life before I knew him, his marriage and the first appearance of his Pickwick, and it turned out that I had some vague connection to both. He got married on my birthday, and the character of Mr. Pickwick was named after me.[10]
The first number had not yet appeared when his Sketches by Boz, Illustrative of Every-Day Life and Every-Day People, came forth in two duodecimos with some capital cuts by Cruikshank, and with a preface in which he spoke of the nervousness he should have had in venturing alone before the public, and of his delight in getting the help of Cruikshank, who had frequently contributed to the success, though his well-earned reputation rendered it impossible for him ever to have shared the hazard, of similar undertakings. It very soon became apparent that there was no hazard here. The Sketches were much more talked about than the first two or three numbers of Pickwick, and I remember still with what hearty praise the book was first named to me by my dear friend Albany Fonblanque, as keen and clear a judge as ever lived either of books or men. Richly did it merit all the praise it had, and more, I will add, than he was ever disposed to give to it himself. He decidedly underrated it. He gave, in subsequent writings, so much more perfect form and fullness to everything it contained, that he did not[114] care to credit himself with the marvel of having yet so early anticipated so much. But the first sprightly runnings of his genius are undoubtedly here. Mr. Bumble is in the parish sketches, and Mr. Dawkins the dodger in the Old Bailey scenes. There is laughter and fun to excess, never misapplied; there are the minute points and shades of character, with all the discrimination and nicety of detail, afterwards so famous; there is everywhere the most perfect ease and skill of handling. The observation shown throughout is nothing short of wonderful. Things are painted literally as they are, and, whatever the picture, whether of every-day vulgar, shabby-genteel, or downright low, with neither the condescending air which is affectation, nor the too familiar one which is slang. The book altogether is a perfectly unaffected, unpretentious, honest performance. Under its manly, sensible, straightforward vein of talk there is running at the same time a natural flow of sentiment never sentimental, of humor always easy and unforced, and of pathos for the most part dramatic or picturesque, under which lay the germ of what his mature genius took afterwards most delight in. Of course there are inequalities in it, and some things that would have been better away; but it is a book that might have stood its ground, even if it had stood alone, as containing unusually truthful observation of a sort of life between the middle class and the low, which, having few attractions for bookish observers, was quite unhackneyed ground. It had otherwise also the very special merit of being in no respect bookish or commonplace in its descriptions of the old city with which its writer was so familiar. It was a picture of every-day[115] London at its best and worst, in its humors and enjoyments as well as its sufferings and sins, pervaded everywhere not only with the absolute reality of the things depicted, but also with that subtle sense and mastery of feeling which gives to the reader's sympathies invariably right direction, and awakens consideration, tenderness, and kindness precisely for those who most need such help.
The first number hadn't even come out when his Sketches by Boz, Illustrative of Everyday Life and Everyday People was released in two small volumes featuring some amazing illustrations by Cruikshank. In the preface, he talked about how nervous he would have felt going solo in front of the public and how thrilled he was to have Cruikshank’s support, who had often contributed to success but had a well-earned reputation that made it impossible for him to share the risks of similar projects. It quickly became clear that there was no risk involved here. The Sketches received much more attention than the first couple of Pickwick numbers, and I still remember how enthusiastically my dear friend Albany Fonblanque praised the book when he first mentioned it to me. He was as sharp a critic of both books and people as anyone could be. It truly deserved all the praise it got, and more, which I will add he was never willing to acknowledge on his own. He later gave much more refined expression and depth to everything it contained in his subsequent writings, so he didn't want to fully recognize the talent he had so early on displayed. But the initial lively bursts of his genius are without a doubt present here. Mr. Bumble appears in the parish sketches, and Mr. Dawkins, the dodger, shows up in the Old Bailey scenes. There is laughter and fun in abundance, never misused; the details of character are captured with the precision and exactness that would later become famous; and everywhere there is a perfect ease and skill in the writing. The observations throughout are nothing short of remarkable. Things are depicted just as they are, whether they are everyday vulgarity, lower-middle-class pretentiousness, or outright low life, without the condescending tone of affectation or the overly familiar tone of slang. Overall, the book is refreshingly genuine, straightforward, and honest. Beneath its sensible, direct language flows a natural sentiment that’s never sentimental, humor that’s always light and effortless, and pathos that is mostly dramatic or visual, under which lies the seed of what his later genius would enjoy most. Of course, there are inconsistencies, and a few things that might have been better left out; but it’s a book that could have held its own, even if standing alone, as it contains unusually accurate observations of a kind of life between the middle class and the low, which, having few attractions for typical literary observers, was largely unexplored territory. It also has the unique advantage of being anything but literary or ordinary in its depictions of the old city that the author knew so well. It paints a picture of everyday London at its best and worst, capturing its humor and joys as well as its pains and vices, infused throughout not only with the absolute reality of the subjects depicted but also with that subtle understanding and emotional skill that guides the reader’s sympathies in the right direction, stirring up consideration, tenderness, and kindness especially for those who need it most.
Between the first and the second numbers of Pickwick, the artist, Mr. Seymour, died by his own hand; and the number came out with three instead of four illustrations. Dickens had seen the unhappy man only once, forty-eight hours before his death; when he went to Furnival's Inn with an etching for the "stroller's tale" in that number, which, altered at Dickens's suggestion, he brought away again for the few further touches that occupied him to a late hour of the night before he destroyed himself. A notice attached to the number informed the public of this latter fact. There was at first a little difficulty in replacing him, and for a single number Mr. Buss was interposed. But before the fourth number a choice had been made, which as time went on was so thoroughly justified, that through the greater part of the wonderful career which was then beginning the connection was kept up, and Mr. Hablot Browne's name is not unworthily associated with the masterpieces of Dickens's genius. An incident which I heard related by Mr. Thackeray at one of the Royal Academy dinners belongs to this time: "I can remember when Mr. Dickens was a very young man, and had commenced delighting the world with some charming humorous works in covers which were[116] colored light green and came out once a month, that this young man wanted an artist to illustrate his writings; and I recollect walking up to his chambers in Furnival's Inn, with two or three drawings in my hand, which, strange to say, he did not find suitable." Dickens has himself described another change now made in the publication: "We started with a number of twenty-four pages and four illustrations. Mr. Seymour's sudden and lamented death before the second number was published, brought about a quick decision upon a point already in agitation: the number became one of thirty-two pages with only two illustrations, and remained so to the end."
Between the first and second issues of Pickwick, the artist, Mr. Seymour, took his own life; and the issue was released with three illustrations instead of four. Dickens had only seen the troubled man once, forty-eight hours before his death, when he visited Furnival's Inn with an etching for the "stroller's tale" in that issue. After Dickens suggested some changes, Seymour took it back to make a few more adjustments, which kept him busy until late the night before he ended his life. A notice attached to the issue informed the public of this unfortunate event. Initially, there was a bit of difficulty in finding a replacement, and for one issue, Mr. Buss was brought in. However, by the time the fourth issue came out, a choice had been made that was so well-received over time that throughout much of the remarkable career that was just beginning, the partnership continued, and Mr. Hablot Browne's name became rightly linked with the masterpieces of Dickens’s work. An incident I heard recounted by Mr. Thackeray at one of the Royal Academy dinners dates back to this time: "I remember when Mr. Dickens was quite young and had begun to charm the world with delightful humorous works covered in light green, which came out monthly. This young man was looking for an artist to illustrate his writings, and I remember walking up to his rooms at Furnival's Inn with a couple of drawings in my hand, which, strangely enough, he didn’t think were suitable." Dickens also described another change made in the publication: "We started with an issue of twenty-four pages and four illustrations. Mr. Seymour's sudden and tragic death before the second issue was published led to a swift decision on an already discussed matter: the issue became thirty-two pages long with only two illustrations, and that remained the standard until the end."
The Session of 1836 terminated his connection with the gallery, and some fruits of his increased leisure showed themselves before the close of the year. His eldest sister's musical attainments and connections had introduced him to many cultivators and professors of that art; he was led to take much interest in Mr. Braham's enterprise at the St. James's theatre; and in aid of it he wrote a farce for Mr. Harley, founded upon one of his sketches, and the story and songs for an opera composed by his friend Mr. Hullah. Both the Strange Gentleman, acted in September, and the Village Coquettes, produced in December, 1836, had a good success; and the last is memorable to me for having brought me first into personal communication with Dickens.
The Session of 1836 ended his association with the gallery, and some results of his newfound free time began to show before the year was over. His oldest sister’s musical skills and connections had introduced him to many musicians and educators in that field; he became interested in Mr. Braham's project at the St. James's theatre; and to support it, he wrote a farce for Mr. Harley, based on one of his sketches, as well as the story and songs for an opera composed by his friend Mr. Hullah. Both the Strange Gentleman, performed in September, and the Village Coquettes, premiered in December 1836, were successful; and the latter is memorable to me because it was the first time I had a personal interaction with Dickens.
CHAPTER VI.
WRITING THE PICKWICK PAPERS.
1837.
The first letter I had from him was at the close of 1836, from Furnival's Inn, when he sent me the book of his opera of the Village Coquettes, which had been published by Mr. Bentley; and this was followed, two months later, by his collected Sketches, both first and second series; which he desired me to receive "as a very small testimony of the donor's regard and obligations,[118] as well as of his desire to cultivate and avail himself of a friendship which has been so pleasantly thrown in his way. . . . In short, if you will receive them for my sake and not for their own, you will very greatly oblige me." I had met him in the interval at the house of our common friend Mr. Ainsworth, and I remember vividly the impression then made upon me.
The first letter I received from him was at the end of 1836, from Furnival's Inn. He sent me the book of his opera, the Village Coquettes, which had been published by Mr. Bentley. Two months later, he followed up with his collected Sketches, both first and second series, which he asked me to accept "as a very small token of the donor's appreciation and obligations,[118] as well as his wish to foster and benefit from a friendship that has come to him so pleasantly. . . . In short, if you will take them for my sake and not for their own, you will greatly oblige me." In the meantime, I had met him at the house of our mutual friend Mr. Ainsworth, and I clearly remember the impression he made on me then.
Very different was his face in those days from that which photography has made familiar to the present generation. A look of youthfulness first attracted you, and then a candor and openness of expression which made you sure of the qualities within. The features were very good. He had a capital forehead, a firm nose with full wide nostril, eyes wonderfully beaming with intellect and running over with humor and cheerfulness, and a rather prominent mouth strongly marked with sensibility. The head was altogether well formed and symmetrical, and the air and carriage of it were extremely spirited. The hair so scant and grizzled in later days was then of a rich brown and most luxuriant abundance, and the bearded face of his last two decades had hardly a vestige of hair or whisker; but there was that in the face as I first recollect it which no time could change, and which remained implanted on it unalterably to the last. This was the quickness, keenness, and practical power, the eager, restless, energetic outlook on each several feature, that seemed to tell so little of a student or writer of books, and so much of a man of action and business in the world. Light and motion flashed from every part of it. It was as if made of steel, was said of it, four or five years after the time to which I am referring, by a most original and delicate[119] observer, the late Mrs. Carlyle. "What a face is his to meet in a drawing-room!" wrote Leigh Hunt to me, the morning after I made them known to each other. "It has the life and soul in it of fifty human beings." In such sayings are expressed not alone the restless and resistless vivacity and force of which I have spoken, but that also which lay beneath them of steadiness and hard endurance.
His face back then was very different from the one that photography has made familiar to today’s generation. At first, you were drawn in by his youthful appearance, followed by a candid and open expression that assured you of his inner qualities. His features were striking. He had a strong forehead, a firm nose with wide nostrils, and eyes that sparkled with intelligence, overflowing with humor and cheerfulness. His mouth was quite pronounced, showing a strong sense of empathy. Altogether, his head was well-shaped and symmetrical, radiating a spirited energy. The hair that is now sparse and gray was once a rich brown, thick and luxurious, and the bearded face he wore in his later years hardly had any hair left. Yet, there was something about his face as I first remember it that no passage of time could change, which stayed with him unchanged until the end. This was the quickness, sharpness, and practical power of his features, the eager and restless energy that suggested he was more a man of action and business than just a student or writer. Light and motion radiated from him. "It was as if made of steel," was noted four or five years later by the insightful Mrs. Carlyle. "What a face to encounter in a drawing-room!" Leigh Hunt wrote to me the morning after they met. "It has the life and soul of fifty human beings." These observations capture not only the vibrant and unstoppable energy I’ve mentioned but also the underlying qualities of stability and resilience.
Several unsuccessful efforts were made by each to get the other to his house before the door of either was opened at last. A son had been born to him on Twelfth-day (the 6th January, 1837), and before the close of the following month he and his wife were in the lodgings at Chalk they had occupied after their marriage. Early in March there is a letter from him accounting for the failure of a promise to call on me because of "a crew of house-agents and attorneys" through whom he had nearly missed his conveyance to Chalk, and been made "more than half wild besides." This was his last letter from Furnival's Inn. In that same month he went to 48, Doughty Street; and in his first letter to me from that address, dated at the close of the month, there is this passage: "We only called upon you a second time in the hope of getting you to dine with us, and were much disappointed not to find you. I have delayed writing a reply to your note, meaning to call upon you. I have been so much engaged, however, in the pleasant occupation of 'moving' that I have not had time; and I am obliged at last to write and say that I have been long engaged to the Pickwick publishers to a dinner in honor of that hero which comes off to-morrow. I am consequently unable to accept[120] your kind invite, which I frankly own I should have liked much better."
Several unsuccessful attempts were made by each to get the other to his house before either of them finally opened their door. He had a son born on Twelfth Day (January 6, 1837), and by the end of the following month, he and his wife were back in the Chalk lodging they had stayed in after their marriage. In early March, I received a letter from him explaining why he couldn’t keep his promise to visit me, citing "a bunch of house-agents and attorneys" that almost made him miss his ride to Chalk and left him "more than half wild" besides. This was his last letter from Furnival's Inn. That same month, he moved to 48 Doughty Street, and in his first letter to me from that address, dated at the end of the month, he wrote: "We only called on you a second time hoping to get you to dinner with us, and we were very disappointed not to find you. I’ve hesitated to reply to your note because I intended to visit you. However, I've been so busy with the enjoyable task of 'moving' that I haven’t had time, and I finally have to write and say that I’ve had a long-standing commitment to the Pickwick publishers for a dinner in honor of that hero, which is happening tomorrow. So, unfortunately, I can't accept your kind invitation, which I honestly would have preferred."
That Saturday's celebration of his twelfth number, the anniversary of the birth of Pickwick, preceded by but a few weeks a personal sorrow which profoundly moved him. His wife's next younger sister, Mary, who lived with them, and by sweetness of nature even more than by graces of person had made herself the ideal of his life, died with a terrible suddenness that for the time completely bore him down.[11] His grief and suffering were intense, and affected him, as will be seen, through many after-years. The publication of Pickwick was interrupted for two months, the effort of writing it not being possible to him. He moved for change of scene to Hampstead, and here, at the close of May, I visited him, and became first his guest. More than ordinarily susceptible at the moment to all kindliest impressions, his heart opened itself to mine. I left him as much his friend, and as entirely in his confidence, as if I had known him for years. Nor had many weeks passed before he addressed to me from Doughty Street words which it is my sorrowful pride to remember have had literal fulfillment: "I look back with unmingled pleasure to every link which each ensuing week has added to the chain of our attachment. It shall go hard, I hope, ere anything but Death impairs the toughness of a bond now so firmly riveted." It remained unweakened till death came.
That Saturday's celebration of his twelfth number, the anniversary of the birth of Pickwick, came just a few weeks after a personal loss that deeply affected him. His wife’s younger sister, Mary, who lived with them and had become the ideal in his life due to her sweet nature even more than her looks, died suddenly in a way that completely overwhelmed him. His grief and suffering were intense and impacted him, as will be shown, for many years to come. The publication of Pickwick was delayed for two months as he found it impossible to write. He sought a change of scenery in Hampstead, and here, at the end of May, I visited him and became his guest. More open than usual to all forms of kindness at that moment, he connected with me on a deep level. I left him feeling like a close friend, fully trusted by him, as if we had known each other for years. Not many weeks passed before he wrote to me from Doughty Street, words that I sadly take pride in remembering have come true: "I look back with complete pleasure at every link that each passing week has added to the chain of our connection. It will take a lot, I hope, before anything but Death weakens the strength of a bond that is now so firmly established." It remained strong until death arrived.
There were circumstances that drew us at once into[121] frequent and close communication. What the sudden popularity of his writings implied, was known to others some time before it was known to himself; and he was only now becoming gradually conscious of all the disadvantage this had placed him at. He would have laughed if, at this outset of his wonderful fortune in literature, his genius acknowledged by all without misgiving, young, popular, and prosperous, any one had compared him to the luckless men of letters of former days, whose common fate was to be sold into a slavery which their later lives were passed in vain endeavors to escape from. Not so was his fate to be, yet something of it he was doomed to experience. He had unwittingly sold himself into a quasi-bondage, and had to purchase his liberty at a heavy cost, after considerable suffering.
There were circumstances that immediately pulled us into[121] frequent and close communication. The sudden popularity of his writings was noticed by others long before he realized it himself; he was just starting to understand the disadvantages this had put him in. He would have laughed if, at the beginning of his amazing success in literature, with his talent recognized by everyone without doubt, young, popular, and thriving, anyone had compared him to the unfortunate writers of the past, who commonly faced a fate of being trapped in a kind of slavery that they spent the rest of their lives trying to escape. That wouldn’t be his fate, yet he was still destined to experience some part of it. He had unknowingly sold himself into a sort of bondage and had to pay a steep price for his freedom after going through considerable suffering.
It was not until the fourth or fifth number of Pickwick (in the latter Sam Weller made his first appearance) that its importance began to be understood by "the trade," and on the eve of the issue of its sixth number, the 22d August, 1836, he had signed an agreement with Mr. Bentley to undertake the editorship of a monthly magazine to be started the following January, to which he was to supply a serial story; and soon afterwards he had agreed with the same publisher to write two other tales, the first at a specified early date; the expressed remuneration in each case being certainly quite inadequate to the claims of a writer of any marked popularity. Under these Bentley agreements he was now writing, month by month, the first half of Oliver Twist, and, under his Chapman & Hall agreement, the last half of Pickwick, not even by a week in advance[122] of the printer with either; when a circumstance became known to him of which he thus wrote to me:
It wasn't until the fourth or fifth issue of Pickwick (in which Sam Weller made his first appearance) that its significance started to be recognized by "the trade." On the eve of the release of its sixth issue, on August 22, 1836, he signed an agreement with Mr. Bentley to take on the editorship of a monthly magazine set to launch the following January, for which he would provide a serialized story. Shortly after, he also agreed with the same publisher to write two other tales, the first of which was due at a specified early date; the payment for each was definitely not adequate for a writer of any notable popularity. Under these agreements with Bentley, he was now writing, month by month, the first half of Oliver Twist, and, under his Chapman & Hall agreement, the last half of Pickwick, not even a week ahead of the printer with either; when he learned of a situation that he then wrote to me about:
"I heard half an hour ago, on authority which leaves me in no doubt about the matter (from the binder of Pickwick, in fact), that Macrone intends publishing a new issue of my Sketches in monthly parts of nearly the same size and in just the same form as the Pickwick Papers. I need not tell you that this is calculated to injure me most seriously, or that I have a very natural and most decided objection to being supposed to presume upon the success of the Pickwick, and thus foist this old work upon the public in its new dress for the mere purpose of putting money in my own pocket. Neither need I say that the fact of my name being before the town, attached to three publications at the same time, must prove seriously prejudicial to my reputation. As you are acquainted with the circumstances under which these copyrights were disposed of, and as I know I may rely on your kind help, may I beg you to see Macrone, and to state in the strongest and most emphatic manner my feeling on this point? I wish him to be reminded of the sums he paid for those books; of the sale he has had for them; of the extent to which he has already pushed them; and of the very great profits he must necessarily have acquired from them. I wish him also to be reminded that no intention of publishing them in this form was in the remotest manner hinted to me, by him or on his behalf, when he obtained possession of the copyright. I then wish you to put it to his feelings of common honesty and fair dealing whether after this communication he will persevere in his intention." What else the letter contained[123] need not be quoted, but it strongly moved me to do my best.
"I heard half an hour ago, from a reliable source (the binder of Pickwick, actually), that Macrone plans to publish a new edition of my Sketches in monthly installments, almost the same size and format as the Pickwick Papers. I don't need to tell you that this could seriously harm my career, or that I have a perfectly reasonable and strong objection to being thought to exploit the success of Pickwick by reintroducing this old work to the public just to make money for myself. I also don't need to mention that having my name associated with three publications simultaneously could seriously damage my reputation. Since you know the circumstances behind the sale of these copyrights, and because I know I can count on your support, could I ask you to speak to Macrone and express my feelings on this matter in the strongest possible terms? I want him to be reminded of how much he paid for those books, the sales he has made, the extent to which he has already promoted them, and the significant profits he must have earned from them. I also want him to know that there was no hint of any plan to publish them in this format when he took over the copyright. Please appeal to his sense of honesty and fair play to see if he will change his mind after this conversation." What else the letter contained[123] need not be quoted, but it strongly moved me to do my best.
I found Mr. Macrone inaccessible to all arguments of persuasion, however. That he had bought the book for a small sum at a time when the smallest was not unimportant to the writer, shortly before his marriage, and that he had since made very considerable profits by it, in no way disturbed his position that he had a right to make as much as he could of what was his, without regard to how it had become so. There was nothing for it but to change front, and, admitting it might be a less evil to the unlucky author to repurchase than to let the monthly issue proceed, to ask what further gain was looked for; but so wide a mouth was opened at this that I would have no part in the costly process of filling it. I told Dickens so, and strongly counseled him to keep quiet for a time.
I found Mr. Macrone completely resistant to any arguments for persuasion. The fact that he had bought the book for a small amount at a time when even a small sum mattered to the author, just before his marriage, and that he had since made significant profits from it, did nothing to change his belief that he had the right to profit as much as he could from what was his, regardless of how he came to have it. There was no choice but to change strategy, admitting it might be less harmful for the unfortunate author to buy it back than to let the monthly release continue, and to ask what additional profit was expected; but the response was so overwhelming that I wanted no part in the expensive process of addressing it. I told Dickens this and strongly advised him to remain quiet for a while.
But the worry and vexation were too great with all the work he had in hand, and I was hardly surprised next day to receive the letter sent me; which yet should be prefaced with the remark that suspense of any kind was at all times intolerable to the writer. The interval between the accomplishment of anything, and "its first motion," Dickens never could endure, and he was too ready to make any sacrifice to abridge or end it. This did not belong to the strong side of his character, and advantage was frequently taken of the fact. "I sent down just now to know whether you were at home (two o'clock), as Chapman & Hall were with me, and, the case being urgent, I wished to have the further benefit of your kind advice and assistance. Macrone and H—— (arcades ambo) waited on them[124] this morning, and after a long discussion peremptorily refused to take one farthing less than the two thousand pounds. H—— repeated the statement of figures which he made to you yesterday, and put it to Hall whether he could say from his knowledge of such matters that the estimate of probable profit was exorbitant. Hall, whose judgment may be relied on in such matters, could not dispute the justice of the calculation. And so the matter stood. In this dilemma it occurred to them (my Pickwick men), whether, if the Sketches must appear in monthly numbers, it would not be better for them to appear for their benefit and mine conjointly than for Macrone's sole use and behoof; whether they, having all the Pickwick machinery in full operation, could not obtain for them a much larger sale than Macrone could ever get; and whether, even at this large price of two thousand pounds, we might not, besides retaining the copyright, reasonably hope for a good profit on the outlay. These suggestions having presented themselves, they came straight to me (having obtained a few hours' respite) and proposed that we should purchase the copyrights between us for the two thousand pounds, and publish them in monthly parts. I need not say that no other form of publication would repay the expenditure; and they wish me to explain by an address that they, who may be fairly put forward as the parties, have been driven into that mode of publication, or the copyrights would have been lost. I considered the matter in every possible way. I sent for you, but you were out. I thought of"—what need not be repeated, now that all is past and gone—"and consented. Was I right? I think you will say yes."[125] I could not say no, though I was glad to have been no party to a price so exorbitant; which yet profited extremely little the person who received it. He died in hardly more than two years; and if Dickens had enjoyed the most liberal treatment at his hands, he could not have exerted himself more generously for the widow and children.
But the worry and frustration were too overwhelming with all the work he had in front of him, so I wasn’t surprised the next day to receive the letter sent to me; it should be noted that any kind of suspense was always unbearable for the writer. Dickens could never stand the gap between finishing something and getting it going, and he was too quick to make any sacrifice to shorten or eliminate it. This was not one of his stronger qualities, and people often took advantage of it. “I just sent a message to see if you were home (two o'clock), since Chapman & Hall were with me, and, since the situation was urgent, I wanted to get your valuable advice and help. Macrone and H—— (both in the same boat) met with them this morning, and after a long discussion, they firmly refused to take even one penny less than two thousand pounds. H—— repeated the figures he shared with you yesterday and asked Hall if he could confirm, based on his experience, that the expected profit estimate was excessive. Hall, whose judgment can be trusted in such matters, couldn’t dispute the fairness of the calculation. And that’s where we stood. In this situation, it occurred to them (my Pickwick guys) that if the Sketches must be published in monthly parts, it might be better for them to be published for both their benefit and mine rather than just for Macrone's profit; whether they could use the full Pickwick machinery to get a much larger sale than Macrone could ever achieve; and whether, even at the high price of two thousand pounds, we might not, while retaining the copyright, reasonably hope for a decent profit on the investment. Once these ideas came up, they came straight to me (having gotten a few hours' break) and suggested we buy the copyrights together for two thousand pounds and publish them in monthly parts. I don't need to say that no other publication method would cover the costs; and they want me to clarify through a statement that they, who can rightly be seen as the involved parties, were pushed into that mode of publication, or the copyrights would have been lost. I thought about it from every angle. I sent for you, but you were out. I thought of—what doesn’t need to be repeated now that it's all in the past—and agreed. Was I right? I think you’ll say yes.”[125] I couldn’t say no, even though I was relieved not to be involved in such an exorbitant price; which ended up benefiting very little the person who received it. He died in hardly over two years; and even if Dickens had received the most generous treatment from him, he could not have done more to help the widow and children.
His new story was now beginning largely to share attention with his Pickwick Papers, and it was delightful to see how real all its people became to him. What I had most, indeed, to notice in him, at the very outset of his career, was his indifference to any praise of his performances on the merely literary side, compared with the higher recognition of them as bits of actual life, with the meaning and purpose on their part, and the responsibility on his, of realities rather than creatures of fancy. The exception that might be drawn from Pickwick is rather in seeming than substance. A first book has its immunities, and the distinction of this from the rest of the writings appears in what has been said of its origin. The plan of it was simply to amuse. It was to string together whimsical sketches of the pencil by entertaining sketches of the pen; and, at its beginning, where or how it was to end was as little known to himself as to any of its readers. But genius is a master as well as a servant, and when the laughter and fun were at their highest something graver made its appearance. He had to defend himself for this; and he said that, though the mere oddity of a new acquaintance was apt to impress one at first, the more serious qualities were discovered when we became friends with the man. In other words he might have[126] said that the change was become necessary for his own satisfaction. The book itself, in teaching him what his power was, had made him more conscious of what would be expected from its use; and this never afterwards quitted him. In what he was to do hereafter, as in all he was doing now, with Pickwick still to finish and Oliver only beginning, it constantly attended him. Nor could it well be otherwise, with all those fanciful creations so real, to a nature in itself so practical and earnest; and in this spirit I had well understood the letter accompanying what had been published of Oliver since its commencement the preceding February, which reached me the day after I visited him. Something to the effect of what has just been said, I had remarked publicly of the portion of the story sent to me; and his instant warm-hearted acknowledgment, of which I permit myself to quote a line or two, showed me in what perfect agreement we were: "How can I thank you? Can I do better than by saying that the sense of poor Oliver's reality, which I know you have had from the first, has been the highest of all praise to me? None that has been lavished upon me have I felt half so much as that appreciation of my intent and meaning. You know I have ever done so, for it was your feeling for me and mine for you that first brought us together, and I hope will keep us so till death do us part. Your notices make me grateful, but very proud: so have a care of them."
His new story was starting to get as much attention as his Pickwick Papers, and it was wonderful to see how real all the characters became to him. What I noticed most at the beginning of his career was his lack of interest in compliments about his writing skills, compared to the greater importance he placed on them as representations of real life, with their own meaning and purpose, and his responsibility for portraying realities rather than mere inventions. The exception with Pickwick is more about appearance than substance. A first book has its privileges, and this one stands out from his other work because of its origins. The aim was simply to entertain. It aimed to connect quirky sketches drawn by the pencil with amusing sketches written by the pen; at the start, neither he nor the readers had any idea where it might end. But genius serves as both a master and a servant, and as the laughter and enjoyment peaked, something more serious emerged. He had to justify this shift, explaining that while the initial oddity of a new acquaintance may impress at first, deeper qualities surface once you become friends. In other words, he could have said the change was necessary for his own satisfaction. The book itself, by revealing his abilities, made him more aware of what would be expected from its use; and this understanding never left him. In everything he did afterward, with Pickwick still unfinished and Oliver just beginning, this awareness stayed with him. It couldn't be otherwise, given how real all those imaginative creations were to someone with such a practical and serious nature. I understood the letter that accompanied what had been published of Oliver since it started the previous February, which I received the day after my visit to him. I had publicly commented along the lines of what I've just mentioned about the part of the story that was sent to me; and his heartfelt response, from which I quote a line or two, showed how perfectly we aligned: "How can I thank you? Can I do better than by saying that the sense of poor Oliver's reality, which I know you've felt from the beginning, has been the greatest praise I could ask for? None of the flattery I've received means as much to me as your appreciation of my intentions and meaning. You know I've always felt this way, for it was your feelings for me and mine for you that first brought us together, and I hope will keep us united until death do us part. Your comments make me grateful, but also very proud: so take care with them."
There was nothing written by him after this date which I did not see before the world did, either in manuscript or proofs; and in connection with the latter I shortly began to give him the help which he[127] publicly mentioned twenty years later in dedicating his collected writings to me. One of his letters reminds me when these corrections began, and they were continued very nearly to the last. They lightened for him a labor of which he had more than enough imposed upon him at this time by others, and they were never anything but an enjoyment to me. "I have," he wrote, "so many sheets of the Miscellany to correct before I can begin Oliver, that I fear I shall not be able to leave home this morning. I therefore send your revise of the Pickwick by Fred, who is on his way with it to the printers. You will see that my alterations are very slight, but I think for the better." This was the fourteenth number of the Pickwick Papers. Fred was his next younger brother, who lived with him at the time.
There was nothing he wrote after this date that I didn't see before the world did, whether in manuscript or proofs; and related to the latter, I soon started to help him, which he publicly acknowledged twenty years later when he dedicated his collected works to me. One of his letters reminds me of when these corrections began, and they continued almost until the end. They eased a burden he had already taken on from others at that time, and they were always a pleasure for me. "I have," he wrote, "so many sheets of the Miscellany to correct before I can start Oliver, that I'm afraid I won't be able to leave home this morning. So I’m sending your revisions of the Pickwick with Fred, who is on his way to the printers with it. You'll see that my changes are very minor, but I believe they're for the better." This was the fourteenth number of the Pickwick Papers. Fred was his younger brother, who lived with him at the time.
The number following this was the famous one in which the hero finds himself in the Fleet; and another of his letters will show what enjoyment the writing of it had given to himself. I had sent to ask him where we were to meet for a proposed ride that day. "Here," was his reply. "I am slippered and jacketed, and, like that same starling who is so very seldom quoted, can't get out. I am getting on, thank Heaven, like 'a house o' fire,' and think the next Pickwick will bang all the others. I shall expect you at one, and we will walk to the stable together. If you know anybody at Saint Paul's, I wish you'd send round and ask them not to ring the bell so. I can hardly hear my own ideas as they come into my head, and say what they mean."
The number that follows this was the famous one where the hero finds himself in the Fleet; and another of his letters will show how much enjoyment writing it gave him. I had sent a message asking him where we were supposed to meet for a ride that day. "Here," was his reply. "I’m in my slippers and jacket, and like that same starling who is rarely quoted, I can't get out. I'm making good progress, thank Heaven, like 'a house on fire,' and I think the next Pickwick will outshine all the others. I’ll expect you at one, and we can walk to the stable together. If you know anyone at Saint Paul's, I’d appreciate it if you could ask them not to ring the bell so much. I can hardly hear my own thoughts as they come to me and figure out what they mean."
The exulting tone of confidence in what he had thus[128] been writing was indeed well justified. He had as yet done nothing so remarkable, in blending humor with tragedy, as his picture of what the poor side of a debtors' prison was in the days of which we have seen that he had himself had bitter experience; and we have but to recall, as it rises sharply to the memory, what is contained in this portion of a work that was not only among his earliest but his least considered as to plan, to understand what it was that not alone had given him his fame so early, but that in itself held the germ of the future that awaited him. Every point was a telling one, and the truthfulness of the whole unerring. The dreadful restlessness of the place, undefined yet unceasing, unsatisfying and terrible, was pictured throughout with De Foe's minute reality; while points of character were handled in that greater style which connects with the richest oddities of humor an insight into principles of character universal as nature itself. When he resolved that Sam Weller should be occupant of the prison with Mr. Pickwick, he was perhaps thinking of his favorite Smollett, and how, when Peregrine Pickle was inmate of the Fleet, Hatchway and Pipes refused to leave him; but Fielding himself might have envied his way of setting about it. Nor is any portion of his picture less admirable than this. The comedy gradually deepening into tragedy; the shabby vagabonds who are the growth of debtors' prisons, contrasting with the poor simple creatures who are their sacrifices and victims; Mr. Mivins and Mr. Smangle side by side with the cobbler ruined by his legacy, who sleeps under the table to remind himself of his old four-poster; Mr. Pickwick's first night in the marshal's[129] room, Sam Weller entertaining Stiggins in the snuggery, Jingle in decline, and the chancery prisoner dying; in all these scenes there was writing of the first order, a deep feeling of character, that delicate form of humor which has a quaintly pathetic turn in it as well, comedy of the richest and broadest kind, and the easy handling throughout of a master in his art. We place the picture by the side of those of the great writers of this style, of fiction in our language, and it does not fall by the comparison.
The upbeat tone of confidence in what he had written was definitely justified. He hadn't done anything quite as remarkable as his portrayal of the grim reality of a debtors' prison during the times he had personally endured; and if we think back to this part of a work that was not only one of his earliest but also his least planned, we can see what had earned him early fame and contained the seeds of his future success. Every detail hit home, and the overall truthfulness was undeniable. The terrible restlessness of the place, vague yet constant, frustrating and horrific, was depicted with Defoe's meticulous realism; while character insights were delivered in a way that linked the richest quirks of humor to universal aspects of human nature. When he decided that Sam Weller would share a prison with Mr. Pickwick, he might have been thinking of his favorite Smollett and how, when Peregrine Pickle was at the Fleet, Hatchway and Pipes refused to leave him; yet Fielding himself might have envied this approach. No part of his depiction was any less admirable. The comedy gradually turning into tragedy; the shabby outcasts formed by debtors' prisons, contrasting with the innocent souls who are their sacrifices; Mr. Mivins and Mr. Smangle alongside the cobbler ruined by his inheritance, who sleeps under the table to remember his former four-poster; Mr. Pickwick's first night in the marshal's room, Sam Weller entertaining Stiggins in the cozy nook, Jingle on the decline, and the chancery prisoner dying; in all these scenes, there was first-rate writing, a deep understanding of character, that subtle humor with a strangely touching quality, rich and broad comedy, and the effortless skill of a master in his craft. We place this picture next to those of the great writers of this genre in our language, and it holds its own by comparison.
Of what the reception of the book had been up to this time, and of the popularity Dickens had won as its author, this also will be the proper place to speak. For its kind, its extent, and the absence of everything unreal or factitious in the causes that contributed to it, it is unexampled in literature. Here was a series of sketches, without the pretense to such interest as attends a well-constructed story; put forth in a form apparently ephemeral as its purpose; having none that seemed higher than to exhibit some studies of cockney manners with help from a comic artist; and after four or five parts had appeared, without newspaper notice or puffing, and itself not subserving in the public anything false or unworthy, it sprang into a popularity that each part carried higher and higher, until people at this time talked of nothing else, tradesmen recommended their goods by using its name, and its sale, outstripping at a bound that of all the most famous books of the century, had reached to an almost fabulous number. Of part one, the binder prepared four hundred; and of part fifteen, his order was for more than forty thousand. Every class, the high equally with the low, was[130] attracted to it. The charm of its gayety and good humor, its inexhaustible fun, its riotous overflow of animal spirits, its brightness and keenness of observation, and, above all, the incomparable ease of its many varieties of enjoyment, fascinated everybody. Judges on the bench and boys in the street, gravity and folly, the young and the old, those who were entering life and those who were quitting it, alike found it to be irresistible. "An archdeacon," wrote Mr. Carlyle afterwards to me, "with his own venerable lips, repeated to me, the other night, a strange profane story: of a solemn clergyman who had been administering ghostly consolation to a sick person; having finished, satisfactorily as he thought, and got out of the room, he heard the sick person ejaculate, 'Well, thank God, Pickwick will be out in ten days any way!'—This is dreadful."
Of what the reception of the book had been up to this point, and of the popularity Dickens had gained as its author, this is definitely the right time to discuss it. For its type, its reach, and the absence of anything fake or artificial in the reasons that contributed to it, it is unmatched in literature. Here was a series of sketches, without the pretense to the sort of interest that comes from a well-crafted story; presented in a form that seemed as fleeting as its purpose; with no aim higher than to showcase some observations of Cockney life with the help of a comic artist; and after four or five parts had come out, without any media attention or promotion, and not serving anything false or unworthy to the public, it suddenly gained a popularity that each part pushed further and further, until people were talking about nothing else, tradespeople promoted their goods by mentioning its name, and its sales, skyrocketing past those of all the most famous books of the century, reached an almost unbelievable number. For part one, the binder prepared four hundred copies; for part fifteen, his order was for more than forty thousand. Every class, from the upper to the lower, was drawn to it. The charm of its cheerfulness and good humor, its endless fun, its lively overflow of energy, its bright and sharp observations, and, above all, the unmatched ease of its various pleasures, captivated everyone. Judges on the bench and kids in the street, seriousness and silliness, the young and the old, those starting out in life and those leaving it, all found it irresistible. "An archdeacon," Mr. Carlyle wrote to me later on, "with his own respected words, recounted to me a strange profane story the other night: of a solemn clergyman who had been giving ghostly comfort to a sick person; having finished, as satisfactorily as he believed, and made his way out of the room, he heard the sick person exclaim, 'Well, thank God, Pickwick will be out in ten days anyway!'—This is shocking."
Let me add that there was something more in it all than the gratification of mere fun and laughter, more even than the rarer pleasure that underlies the outbreak of all forms of genuine humor. Another chord had been struck. Over and above the lively painting of manners which at first had been so attractive, there was something that left deeper mark. Genial and irrepressible enjoyment, affectionate heartiness of tone, unrestrained exuberance of mirth, these are not more delightful than they are fleeting and perishable qualities; but the attention eagerly excited by the charm of them in Pickwick found itself retained by something more permanent. We had all become suddenly conscious, in the very thick of the extravaganza of adventure and fun set before us, that here were real people. It was not somebody talking humorously about them,[131] but they were there themselves. That a number of persons belonging to the middle and lower ranks of life (Wardles, Winkles, Wellers, Tupmans, Bardells, Snubbinses, Perkers, Bob Sawyers, Dodsons, and Foggs) had been somehow added to his intimate and familiar acquaintance, the ordinary reader knew before half a dozen numbers were out; and it took not many more to make clear to the intelligent reader that a new and original genius in the walk of Smollett and Fielding had arisen in England.
Let me add that there was something deeper going on than just the enjoyment of fun and laughter, even more than the rarer pleasure that underlies all genuine humor. Another chord was struck. Beyond the lively portrayal of characters that was initially so appealing, there was something that left a lasting impression. Joyful and infectious enjoyment, warm-heartedness, and unrestrained happiness are wonderful qualities, but they are as fleeting as they are delightful; however, the excitement sparked by their charm in Pickwick was held by something more lasting. We suddenly became aware, right in the midst of the wild adventures and fun laid out before us, that these were real people. It wasn't just someone humorously talking about them,[131] they were actually there. The ordinary reader realized, within just a few issues, that a number of characters from the middle and lower classes (Wardles, Winkles, Wellers, Tupmans, Bardells, Snubbinses, Perkers, Bob Sawyers, Dodsons, and Foggs) had somehow been added to his close and familiar circle; and it didn't take many more issues for the perceptive reader to see that a new and original talent in the vein of Smollett and Fielding had emerged in England.
I do not, for reasons to be hereafter stated, think the Pickwick Papers comparable to the later books; but, apart from the new vein of humor it opened, its wonderful freshness and its unflagging animal spirits, it has two characters that will probably continue to attract to it an unfading popularity. Its pre-eminent achievement is of course Sam Weller,—one of those people that take their place among the supreme successes of fiction, as one that nobody ever saw but everybody recognizes, at once perfectly natural and intensely original. Who is there that has ever thought him tedious? Who is so familiar with him as not still to be finding something new in him? Who is so amazed by his inexhaustible resources, or so amused by his inextinguishable laughter, as to doubt of his being as ordinary and perfect a reality, nevertheless, as anything in the London streets? When indeed the relish has been dulled that makes such humor natural and appreciable, and not his native fun only, his ready and rich illustration, his imperturbable self-possession, but his devotion to his master, his chivalry and his gallantry, are no longer discovered, or believed no longer to exist, in[132] the ranks of life to which he belongs, it will be worse for all of us than for the fame of his creator. Nor, when faith is lost in that possible combination of eccentricities and benevolences, shrewdness and simplicity, good sense and folly, all that suggests the ludicrous and nothing that suggests contempt for it, which form the delightful oddity of Pickwick, will the mistake committed be one merely of critical misjudgment. But of this there is small fear. Sam Weller and Mr. Pickwick are the Sancho and the Quixote of Londoners, and as little likely to pass away as the old city itself.
I don’t think the Pickwick Papers measure up to the later books, for reasons I’ll explain later; however, aside from introducing a new style of humor, its remarkable freshness and endless energy, it features two characters that will likely continue to draw enduring popularity. Its most significant achievement is, of course, Sam Weller—one of those characters that stands among the greatest successes in fiction, someone no one has ever met but everyone recognizes, perfectly natural yet intensely original. Who has ever found him boring? Who knows him so well that they still don’t discover something new about him? Who can help but be entertained by his boundless resources and unquenchable laughter, and doubt that he is as ordinary and real as anything you’d find on the streets of London? When the enjoyment that makes such humor relatable and appreciated has faded—along with not just his natural wit, but also his quick and rich storytelling, his calm demeanor, his loyalty to his master, his chivalry, and his charm—if those qualities are no longer noticed or believed to exist in the social circles he belongs to, it will be worse for all of us than for his creator’s legacy. And when we lose faith in that mix of quirks and kindness, cleverness and naivety, common sense and silliness, all that suggests humor without any contempt for it—which forms the delightful oddity of Pickwick—the mistake made won’t just be a simple misjudgment of criticism. However, there is little risk of that. Sam Weller and Mr. Pickwick are the Sancho and Quixote of Londoners, and they’re just as unlikely to fade away as the old city itself.
Dickens was very fond of riding in these early years, and there was no recreation he so much indulged, or with such profit to himself, in the intervals of his hardest work. I was his companion oftener than I could well afford the time for, the distances being great and nothing else to be done for the day; but when a note would unexpectedly arrive while I knew him to be hunted hard by one of his printers, telling me he had been sticking to work so closely that he must have rest, and, by way of getting it, proposing we should start together that morning at eleven o'clock for "a fifteen-mile ride out, ditto in, and a lunch on the road" with a wind-up of six o'clock dinner in Doughty Street, I could not resist the good fellowship. His notion of finding rest from mental exertion in as much bodily exertion of equal severity, continued with him to the last; taking in the later years what I always thought the too great strain of as many miles in walking as he now took in the saddle, and too often indulging it at night; for, though he was always passionately fond of walking, he observed as yet a moderation[133] in it, even accepting as sufficient my seven or eight miles' companionship. "What a brilliant morning for a country walk!" he would write, with not another word in his dispatch. Or, "Is it possible that you can't, oughtn't, shouldn't, mustn't, won't be tempted, this gorgeous day?" Or, "I start precisely—precisely, mind—at half-past one. Come, come, come, and walk in the green lanes. You will work the better for it all the week. Come! I shall expect you." Or, "You don't feel disposed, do you, to muffle yourself up and start off with me for a good brisk walk over Hampstead Heath? I knows a good 'ous there where we can have a red-hot chop for dinner, and a glass of good wine:" which led to our first experience of Jack Straw's Castle, memorable for many happy meetings in coming years. But the rides were most popular and frequent. "I think," he would write, "Richmond and Twickenham, thro' the park, out at Knightsbridge, and over Barnes Common, would make a beautiful ride." Or, "Do you know, I shouldn't object to an early chop at some village inn?" Or, "Not knowing whether my head was off or on, it became so addled with work, I have gone riding the old road, and should be truly delighted to meet or be overtaken by you." Or, "Where shall it be—oh, where—Hampstead, Greenwich, Windsor? where?????? while the day is bright, not when it has dwindled away to nothing! For who can be of any use whatsomdever such a day as this, excepting out of doors?" Or it might be interrogatory summons to "A hard trot of three hours?" or intimation as laconic "To be heard of at Eel-pie House, Twickenham!" When first I knew him, I may[134] add, his carriage for his wife's use was a small chaise with a smaller pair of ponies, which, having a habit of making sudden rushes up by-streets in the day and peremptory standstills in ditches by night, were changed in the following year for a more suitable equipage.
Dickens loved riding in those early years, and it was the only pastime he really enjoyed, as well as one that benefited him during breaks from his toughest work. I often joined him, even when I could hardly spare the time, since the distances were large and there was nothing else to do for the day; but when a note would unexpectedly arrive, saying he had been pushing hard with one of his printers, telling me he needed to rest, and suggesting we set off that morning at eleven for "a fifteen-mile ride out, the same back, and a lunch on the way," followed by a six o'clock dinner in Doughty Street, I couldn't say no to the camaraderie. His idea of finding rest from mental labor in equally intense physical activity lasted until the end; in his later years, he often took on what I thought was too much stress by walking as many miles as he rode, sometimes doing it at night; for although he was always passionately fond of walking, he still somewhat moderated it, even accepting my company for just seven or eight miles. "What a beautiful morning for a country walk!" he would write, with no other words in his message. Or, "Is it possible that you can’t, shouldn’t, mustn’t, wouldn't be tempted on this gorgeous day?" Or, "I start at exactly half-past one. Come, come, come, and walk in the green lanes. You’ll work better for it all week. Come! I’ll be waiting for you." Or, "You don't feel like bundling up and heading out with me for a brisk walk over Hampstead Heath, do you? I know a good place where we can have a hot chop for dinner and a glass of good wine," which led to our first visit to Jack Straw's Castle, remembered for many joyful gatherings in the future. But the rides were the most popular and frequent. "I think," he would write, "Richmond and Twickenham, through the park, out at Knightsbridge, and over Barnes Common, would make a beautiful ride." Or, "Do you know, I wouldn’t mind an early chop at some village inn?" Or, "Not sure if my head is on straight, as it’s so addled with work, I’ve gone riding on the old road and would be truly delighted to meet up with you." Or, "Where shall it be—oh, where—Hampstead, Greenwich, Windsor? where?????? while the day is bright, not when it’s faded away! Because who can really be of any help on a day like this, except outside?" Or it might be a question asking if we should go for "A hard trot of three hours?" or a short note saying "To be found at Eel-pie House, Twickenham!" When I first met him, his carriage for his wife was a small chaise pulled by a smaller pair of ponies, which had a tendency to suddenly dash up side streets during the day and come to abrupt stops in ditches at night, so they were replaced the following year with a more suitable vehicle.
To this mention of his habits while at work when our friendship began, I have to add what will complete the relation already given, in connection with his Sketches, of the uneasy sense accompanying his labor that it was yielding insufficient for himself while it enriched others, which is a needful part of his story at this time. At midsummer, 1837, replying to some inquiries, and sending his agreement with Mr. Bentley for the Miscellany under which he was writing Oliver, he went on: "It is a very extraordinary fact (I forgot it on Sunday) that I have never had from him a copy of the agreement respecting the novel, which I never saw before or since I signed it at his house one morning long ago. Shall I ask him for a copy or no? I have looked at some memoranda I made at the time, and I fear he has my second novel on the same terms, under the same agreement. This is a bad lookout, but we must try and mend it. You will tell me you are very much surprised at my doing business in this way. So am I, for in most matters of labor and application I am punctuality itself. The truth is (though you do not need I should explain the matter to you, my dear fellow), that if I had allowed myself to be worried by these things, I could never have done as much as I have. But I much fear, in my desire to avoid present vexations, I have laid up a bitter store for the future." The second novel, which he had promised in a complete form[135] for a very early date, and had already selected subject and title for, was published four years later as Barnaby Rudge; but of the third he at present knew nothing but that he was expected to begin it, if not in the magazine, somewhere or other independently within a specified time.
To this mention of his work habits when our friendship began, I need to add what completes the story I’ve already shared, related to his Sketches, about the uneasy feeling he had while working that his efforts were not enough for him but benefited others, which is an important part of his story at this point. In midsummer, 1837, in response to some questions, and while sending his agreement with Mr. Bentley for the Miscellany under which he was writing Oliver, he said: "It’s a really strange fact (I forgot about it on Sunday) that I have never experienced a copy of the agreement concerning the novel, which I’ve never seen before or since I signed it at his house one morning a long time ago. Should I ask him for a copy or not? I’ve looked at some notes I made back then, and I fear he has my second novel under the same terms, with the same agreement. This is a bad situation, but we have to try to fix it. You might tell me you’re really surprised at my way of doing business. So am I, because in most matters of work and dedication, I am the epitome of punctuality. The truth is (though you don’t need me to explain this to you, my dear friend), that if I had let myself get stressed about these issues, I could never have accomplished as much as I have. But I really worry that in my effort to avoid current annoyances, I’ve set myself up for some serious problems in the future." The second novel, which he had promised in a complete form[135] for a very early date, and for which he had already chosen a subject and title, was published four years later as Barnaby Rudge; but as for the third, he currently knew nothing except that he was expected to start it, if not in the magazine, somewhere independently within a specified timeframe.
The first appeal made, in taking action upon his letter, had reference to the immediate pressure of the Barnaby novel; but it also opened up the question of the great change of circumstances since these various agreements had been precipitately signed by him, the very different situation brought about by the extraordinary increase in the popularity of his writings, and the advantage it would be to both Mr. Bentley and himself to make more equitable adjustment of their relations. Some misunderstandings followed, but were closed by a compromise in September, 1837; by which the third novel was abandoned[12] on certain conditions, and Barnaby was undertaken to be finished by November, 1838. This involved a completion of the new story during the progress of Oliver, whatever might be required to follow on the close of Pickwick; and I doubted its wisdom. But it was accepted for the time.
The first appeal made in response to his letter referred to the urgent demand for the Barnaby novel; however, it also raised the issue of the significant change in circumstances since he had hastily signed these various agreements, along with the very different situation created by the remarkable rise in the popularity of his works. It would benefit both Mr. Bentley and him to adjust their relationship in a fairer way. Some misunderstandings occurred but were resolved with a compromise in September 1837, where the third novel was set aside[12] under certain conditions, and it was agreed that Barnaby would be completed by November 1838. This meant finishing the new story while working on Oliver, no matter what was needed after Pickwick ended; I questioned whether that was a wise move. But it was accepted for the time being.
He had meanwhile taken his wife abroad for a ten days' summer holiday, accompanied by the shrewd observant young artist, Mr. Hablot Browne, whose admirable illustrations to Pickwick had more than supplied[136] Mr. Seymour's loss; and I had a letter from him on their landing at Calais on the 2d of July:
He had taken his wife abroad for a ten-day summer vacation, joined by the clever, observant young artist, Mr. Hablot Browne, whose excellent illustrations for Pickwick more than made up for Mr. Seymour's loss; and I received a letter from him when they arrived in Calais on July 2nd:
"We have arranged for a post-coach to take us to Ghent, Brussels, Antwerp, and a hundred other places, that I cannot recollect now and couldn't spell if I did. We went this afternoon in a barouche to some gardens where the people dance, and where they were footing it most heartily,—especially the women, who in their short petticoats and light caps look uncommonly agreeable. A gentleman in a blue surtout and silken berlins accompanied us from the hotel, and acted as curator. He even waltzed with a very smart lady (just to show us, condescendingly, how it ought to be done), and waltzed elegantly, too. We rang for slippers after we came back, and it turned out that this gentleman was the Boots."
"We've arranged for a coach to take us to Ghent, Brussels, Antwerp, and a bunch of other places that I can't remember right now and couldn't spell if I tried. This afternoon, we went in a fancy carriage to some gardens where people were dancing, and they were really getting into it—especially the women, who looked great in their short skirts and light caps. A guy in a blue coat and fancy shoes joined us from the hotel and acted as our guide. He even danced the waltz with a stylish lady (just to show us how it’s done, of course) and did it elegantly, too. When we got back, we asked for slippers, and it turned out that this guy was the shoeshiner."
His later sea-side holiday was passed at Broadstairs, as were those of many subsequent years, and the little watering-place has been made memorable by his pleasant sketch of it. From his letters to myself a few lines may be given of his first doings and impressions there.
His later seaside holiday was spent in Broadstairs, like many of the following years, and this little resort town has become memorable thanks to his delightful description of it. From his letters to me, I can share a few lines about his initial activities and impressions there.
Writing on the 3d of September, he reports himself just risen from an attack of illness. "I am much better, and hope to begin Pickwick No. 18 to-morrow. You will imagine how queer I must have been when I tell you that I have been compelled for four-and-twenty mortal hours to abstain from porter or other malt liquor!!! I have done it though—really. . . . I have discovered that the landlord of the Albion has delicious hollands (but what is that to you? for you cannot sympathize with my feelings), and that a cobbler who lives opposite to my bedroom window is a Roman Catholic, and gives an hour and a half to his devotions every[137] morning behind his counter. I have walked upon the sands at low-water from this place to Ramsgate, and sat upon the same at high-ditto till I have been flayed with the cold. I have seen ladies and gentlemen walking upon the earth in slippers of buff, and pickling themselves in the sea in complete suits of the same. I have seen stout gentlemen looking at nothing through powerful telescopes for hours, and, when at last they saw a cloud of smoke, fancying a steamer behind it, and going home comfortable and happy. I have found out that our next neighbor has a wife and something else under the same roof with the rest of his furniture,—the wife deaf and blind, and the something else given to drinking. And if you ever get to the end of this letter you will find out that I subscribe myself on paper, as on everything else (some atonement perhaps for its length and absurdity)," etc. etc.
Writing on September 3rd, he says he's just recovered from being ill. "I’m feeling much better and hope to start Pickwick No. 18 tomorrow. You can imagine how strange I must have felt, considering I had to avoid porter or any other beer for a full 24 hours!!! But I managed it—really. I’ve discovered that the landlord of the Albion serves delicious hollands (but what does that matter to you? since you can’t relate to my feelings), and that a cobbler who lives across from my bedroom window is a Roman Catholic, spending an hour and a half in prayer every morning behind his counter. I walked along the sands at low tide from here to Ramsgate and sat on the beach at high tide until I got chilled to the bone. I’ve seen ladies and gentlemen strolling about in buff slippers and swimming in the sea fully dressed in the same. I’ve watched portly gentlemen staring at nothing through strong telescopes for hours, and when they finally spotted a cloud of smoke, they imagined a steamer behind it and went home feeling content and happy. I’ve found out that our next-door neighbor has a wife and something else under the same roof with his other belongings—the wife is deaf and blind, and the something else has a drinking problem. And if you make it to the end of this letter you will see that I sign my name on paper, just like everywhere else (perhaps as some sort of penance for its length and absurdity)," etc. etc.
In his next letter (from 12, High Street, Broadstairs, on the 7th) there is allusion to one of the many piracies of Pickwick, which had distinguished itself beyond the rest by a preface abusive of the writer plundered: "I recollect this 'member of the Dramatic Authors' Society' bringing an action once against Chapman who rented the City theatre, in which it was proved that he had undertaken to write under special agreement seven melodramas for five pounds, to enable him to do which a room had been hired in a gin-shop close by. The defendant's plea was that the plaintiff was always drunk, and had not fulfilled his contract. Well, if the Pickwick has been the means of putting a few shillings in the vermin-eaten pockets of so miserable a creature, and has saved him from a workhouse or a jail, let him empty out[138] his little pot of filth and welcome. I am quite content to have been the means of relieving him. Besides, he seems to have suffered by agreements!"
In his next letter (from 12, High Street, Broadstairs, on the 7th), he refers to one of the many piracies of Pickwick, which stood out from the rest due to a preface that insulted the original author: "I remember this 'member of the Dramatic Authors' Society' once suing Chapman, who rented the City theatre, where it was shown that he had agreed to write seven melodramas for five pounds. To do this, he rented a room in a nearby gin-shop. The defendant argued that the plaintiff was always drunk and hadn’t fulfilled his contract. Well, if Pickwick has helped throw a few coins into the filthy pockets of such a pathetic guy and saved him from a workhouse or jail, then let him pour out his little pot of dirt and be thankful. I'm completely fine with having helped him. Besides, it seems he's had trouble with agreements!"
His own troubles in that way were compromised for the time, as already hinted, at the close of this September month; and at the end of the month following, after finishing Pickwick and resuming Oliver, the latter having been suspended by him during the recent disputes, he made his first visit to Brighton. The opening of his letter of Friday the 3d of November is full of regrets that I had been unable to join them there: "It is a beautiful day, and we have been taking advantage of it, but the wind until to-day has been so high and the weather so stormy that Kate has been scarcely able to peep out of doors. On Wednesday it blew a perfect hurricane, breaking windows, knocking down shutters, carrying people off their legs, blowing the fires out, and causing universal consternation. The air was for some hours darkened with a shower of black hats (second-hand), which are supposed to have been blown off the heads of unwary passengers in remote parts of the town, and have been industriously picked up by the fishermen. Charles Kean was advertised for Othello 'for the benefit of Mrs. Sefton, having most kindly postponed for this one day his departure for London.' I have not heard whether he got to the theatre, but I am sure nobody else did. They do The Honeymoon to-night, on which occasion I mean to patronize the drayma. We have a beautiful bay-windowed sitting-room here, fronting the sea, but I have seen nothing of B.'s brother who was to have shown me the lions, and my notions of the place are consequently somewhat confined:[139] being limited to the pavilion, the chain-pier, and the sea. The last is quite enough for me, and, unless I am joined by some male companion (do you think I shall be?), is most probably all I shall make acquaintance with. I am glad you like Oliver this month: especially glad that you particularize the first chapter. I hope to do great things with Nancy. If I can only work out the idea I have formed of her, and of the female who is to contrast with her, I think I may defy Mr. —— and all his works.[13] I have had great difficulty in keeping my hands off Fagin and the rest of them in the evenings; but, as I came down for rest, I have resisted the temptation, and steadily applied myself to the labor of being idle. Did you ever read (of course you have, though) De Foe's History of the Devil? What a capital thing it is! I bought it for a couple of shillings yesterday morning, and have been quite absorbed in it ever since. We must have been jolter-headed geniuses not to have anticipated M.'s reply. My best remembrances to him. I see H. at this moment. I must be present at a rehearsal of that opera. It will be better than any comedy that was ever played. Talking of comedies, I still see No Thoroughfare staring me in the face, every time I[140] look down that road. I have taken places for Tuesday next. We shall be at home at six o'clock, and I shall hope at least to see you that evening. I am afraid you will find this letter extremely dear at eightpence, but if the warmest assurances of friendship and attachment, and anxious lookings-forward to the pleasure of your society, be worth anything, throw them into the balance, together with a hundred good wishes and one hearty assurance that I am," etc. etc. "Charles Dickens. No room for the flourish—I'll finish it the next time I write to you."
His own troubles in that regard were put on hold for now, as hinted earlier, at the end of September; and by the end of the following month, after finishing Pickwick and picking up Oliver again—having paused on it during the recent arguments—he made his first trip to Brighton. The start of his letter on Friday, November 3rd, is filled with regrets that I couldn’t join them there: "It’s a beautiful day, and we’ve been making the most of it, but until today, the wind has been so strong and the weather so stormy that Kate has hardly been able to step outside. On Wednesday, it was a perfect hurricane, breaking windows, knocking down shutters, sweeping people off their feet, blowing out the fires, and causing a widespread panic. For a few hours, the air was filled with a shower of second-hand black hats, which are thought to have been blown off the heads of unsuspecting passersby in the more remote parts of town and were industriously collected by the fishermen. Charles Kean was advertised for Othello 'for the benefit of Mrs. Sefton, having most kindly postponed his departure for London for this one day.' I haven’t heard whether he made it to the theater, but I’m sure nobody else did. They’re doing The Honeymoon tonight, and I plan to attend the play. We have a lovely sitting room with a bay window here, facing the sea, but I haven’t seen B.’s brother, who was supposed to show me around, so my ideas about the place are somewhat limited: just the pavilion, the chain pier, and the sea. The last is plenty for me, and unless I’m joined by some male companion (do you think I will be?), it’s probably all I’ll explore. I’m glad you like Oliver this month, especially happy that you mentioned the first chapter. I hope to accomplish great things with Nancy. If I can just fully express my vision of her and the female character set against her, I think I'll be able to stand up to Mr. —— and all his works. I’ve had a tough time keeping my hands off Fagin and the others during the evenings; but since I came down to relax, I’ve resisted the temptation and focused on doing nothing. Have you ever read Defoe's History of the Devil? It’s such a great read! I bought it for a few shillings yesterday morning and have been completely absorbed in it since then. We must have been foolish not to anticipate M.’s reply. Please send my best regards to him. I see H. at this moment. I must attend a rehearsal of that opera. It will be better than any comedy ever performed. Speaking of comedies, I still see No Entry staring me in the face every time I look down that road. I’ve got tickets for next Tuesday. We’ll be home by six o'clock, and I hope to at least see you that evening. I’m afraid you’ll find this letter pretty pricey at eight pence, but if the warmest expressions of friendship and eagerness to enjoy your company are worth anything, count them in, along with a hundred good wishes and a heartfelt assurance that I am," etc. etc. "Charles Dickens. No space for a flourish—I’ll finish it the next time I write to you."
The flourish that accompanied his signature is familiar to every one. The allusion to the comedy expresses a fancy he at this time had of being able to contribute some such achievement in aid of Macready's gallant efforts at Covent Garden to bring back to the stage its higher associations of good literature and intellectual enjoyment. It connects curiously now that unrealized hope with the exact title of the only story he ever helped himself to dramatize, and which Mr. Fechter played at the Adelphi three years before his death.
The flourish that came with his signature is known by everyone. The reference to the comedy reflects a desire he had at that time to contribute to Macready's brave efforts at Covent Garden to restore the theater's higher connections to good literature and intellectual enjoyment. It oddly links that unfulfilled hope with the exact title of the only story he ever adapted for the stage, which Mr. Fechter performed at the Adelphi three years before his death.
CHAPTER VII.
BETWEEN PICKWICK AND NICKLEBY.
1837-1838.
Not remotely bearing on the stage, nevertheless, was the employment on which I found him busy at his return from Brighton; one result of his more satisfactory relations with Mr. Bentley having led to a promise to edit for him a life of the celebrated clown Grimaldi. The manuscript had been prepared from autobiographical notes by a Mr. Egerton Wilks, and contained one or two stories told so badly, and so well worth better telling, that the hope of enlivening their dullness at the cost of very little labor constituted a sort of attraction for him. Except the preface, he did not write a line of this biography, such modifications or additions as he made having been dictated by him to his father; whom I found often in the supreme enjoyment of the office of amanuensis. He had also a most indifferent opinion of[142] the mass of material which in general composed it, describing it to me as "twaddle," and his own modest estimate of the book, on its completion, may be guessed from the number of notes of admiration (no less than thirty) which accompanied his written mention to me of the sale with which it started in the first week of its publication: "Seventeen hundred Grimaldis have been already sold, and the demand increases daily!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
Not remotely relevant to the stage was the project he was focused on after returning from Brighton; one positive outcome from his improved relationship with Mr. Bentley had him promising to edit a biography of the famous clown Grimaldi. The manuscript was based on autobiographical notes from a Mr. Egerton Wilks and included a couple of stories that were told so poorly, yet deserved to be told better, that he found the chance to brighten them up with little effort somewhat appealing. Apart from the preface, he didn’t write a single line of this biography; any changes or additions were dictated to his father, who I often found thoroughly enjoying his role as a scribe. He also held a rather low opinion of[142] the overall material, referring to it as "nonsense," and his humble assessment of the book after it was finished can be inferred from the number of congratulatory notes (a total of thirty) that accompanied his message to me about its launch week sales: "Seventeen hundred Grimaldis have already been sold, and the demand is growing every day!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
It was not to have all its own way, however. A great many critical faults were found; and one point in particular was urged against his handling such a subject, that he could never himself even have seen Grimaldi. To this last objection he was moved to reply, and had prepared a letter for the Miscellany, "from editor to sub-editor," which it was thought best to suppress, but of which the opening remark may now be not unamusing: "I understand that a gentleman unknown is going about this town privately informing all ladies and gentlemen of discontented natures, that, on a comparison of dates and putting together of many little circumstances which occur to his great sagacity, he has made the profound discovery that I can never have seen Grimaldi whose life I have edited, and that the book must therefore of necessity be bad. Now, sir, although I was brought up from remote country parts in the dark ages of 1819 and 1820 to behold the splendor of Christmas pantomimes and the humor of Joe, in whose honor I am informed I clapped my hands with great precocity, and although I even saw him act in the remote times of 1823, yet as I had not then aspired to the dignity of a tail-coat, though forced by a relentless parent into[143] my first pair of boots, I am willing, with the view of saving this honest gentleman further time and trouble, to concede that I had not arrived at man's estate when Grimaldi left the stage, and that my recollections of his acting are, to my loss, but shadowy and imperfect. Which confession I now make publickly, and without mental qualification or reserve, to all whom it may concern. But the deduction of this pleasant gentleman that therefore the Grimaldi book must be bad, I must take leave to doubt. I don't think that to edit a man's biography from his own notes it is essential you should have known him, and I don't believe that Lord Braybrooke had more than the very slightest acquaintance with Mr. Pepys, whose memoirs he edited two centuries after he died."
It wasn't going to have it all its own way, though. A lot of critical issues were raised; and one specific point was made against his handling of the subject—that he could never have actually seen Grimaldi. In response to this last objection, he felt compelled to reply and had written a letter for the Miscellany, "from editor to sub-editor," which it was decided to keep under wraps, but the opening line might now be somewhat amusing: "I understand that an unknown gentleman is going around this town privately informing all the ladies and gentlemen of discontented nature that, by comparing dates and piecing together many small details that occur to his great wisdom, he has made the insightful discovery that I could never have seen Grimaldi, whose life I have edited, and that the book must therefore be inherently flawed. Now, sir, although I was raised from the far-off countryside during the dark ages of 1819 and 1820 to witness the brilliance of Christmas pantomimes and the humor of Joe, for whom I’m told I clapped my hands with great enthusiasm, and although I even saw him perform back in 1823, I must admit that I had not yet attained the status of wearing a tailcoat, even though a relentless parent forced me into my first pair of boots. I’m willing, to save this honest gentleman further time and trouble, to concede that I was not yet a man when Grimaldi left the stage, and that my memories of his performances are, unfortunately, only vague and incomplete. This confession I now make publicly, without any hesitation or reservation, to all whom it may concern. However, I must respectfully question this gentleman’s conclusion that therefore the Grimaldi book must be bad. I don’t think it’s necessary to know a man to edit his biography from his own notes, and I doubt that Lord Braybrooke had more than the slightest acquaintance with Mr. Pepys, whose memoirs he edited two centuries after his death."
Enormous meanwhile, and without objection audible on any side, had been the success of the completed Pickwick, which we celebrated by a dinner, with himself in the chair and Talfourd in the vice-chair, everybody in hearty good humor with every other body; and a copy of which I received from him on the 11th of December in the most luxurious of Hayday's bindings, with a note worth preserving for its closing allusion. The passage referred to in it was a comment, in delicately chosen words, that Leigh Hunt had made on the inscription at the grave in Kensal Green:[14] "Chapman & Hall have just sent me, with a copy of our deed, three 'extra-super' bound copies of Pickwick, as per specimen inclosed. The first I forward to you, the second I have presented to our good friend Ainsworth,[144] and the third Kate has retained for herself. Accept your copy with one sincere and most comprehensive expression of my warmest friendship and esteem; and a hearty renewal, if there need be any renewal when there has been no interruption, of all those assurances of affectionate regard which our close friendship and communion for a long time back has every day implied. . . . That beautiful passage you were so kind and considerate as to send me, has given me the only feeling akin to pleasure (sorrowful pleasure it is) that I have yet had, connected with the loss of my dear young friend and companion; for whom my love and attachment will never diminish, and by whose side, if it please God to leave me in possession of sense to signify my wishes, my bones, whenever or wherever I die, will one day be laid. Tell Leigh Hunt when you have an opportunity how much he has affected me, and how deeply I thank him for what he has done. You cannot say it too strongly."
Massive success has happened with the completed Pickwick, which we celebrated with a dinner, with him in the chair and Talfourd in the vice-chair, everyone in great spirits with one another; and I received a copy from him on December 11th, in the finest binding from Hayday, along with a note worth keeping for its closing remark. The note referred to Leigh Hunt's elegantly phrased comment about the inscription at the grave in Kensal Green: [14] "Chapman & Hall just sent me, with a copy of our deed, three 'extra-super' bound copies of Pickwick, as per the enclosed sample. I'm sending the first to you, the second I’ve given to our good friend Ainsworth,[144] and the third Kate has kept for herself. Accept your copy with my heartfelt and sincere expression of the warmest friendship and respect; and a genuine renewal, if there needs to be a renewal when there has been no break, of all those assurances of affection that our close friendship has implied for a long time. . . . That beautiful passage you kindly sent me has given me the closest feeling to pleasure (though it's a sorrowful pleasure) that I’ve had so far regarding the loss of my dear young friend and companion, for whom my love and attachment will never fade, and by whose side, if God allows me to keep my senses to express my wishes, my bones will one day be laid, wherever I die. Please tell Leigh Hunt, when you get the chance, how much he has moved me, and how deeply I thank him for what he’s done. You can't say it too strongly."
The "deed" mentioned was one executed in the previous month to restore to him a third ownership in the book which had thus far enriched all concerned but himself. The original understanding respecting it Mr. Edward Chapman thus describes for me: "There was no agreement about Pickwick except a verbal one. Each number was to consist of a sheet and a half, for which we were to pay fifteen guineas; and we paid him for the first two numbers at once, as he required the money to go and get married with. We were also to pay more according to the sale, and I think Pickwick altogether cost us three thousand pounds." Adjustment to the sale would have cost four times as much,[145] and of the actual payments I have myself no note; but, as far as my memory serves, they are overstated by Mr. Chapman. My impression is that, above and beyond the first sum due for each of the twenty numbers (making no allowance for their extension after the first to thirty-two pages), successive checks were given, as the work went steadily on to the enormous sale it reached, which brought up the entire sum received to two thousand five hundred pounds. I had, however, always pressed so strongly the importance to him of some share in the copyright, that this at last was conceded in the deed above mentioned, though five years were to elapse before the right should accrue; and it was only yielded as part consideration for a further agreement entered into at the same date (the 19th of November, 1837), whereby Dickens engaged to "write a new work, the title whereof shall be determined by him, of a similar character and of the same extent as the Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club," the first number of which was to be delivered on the 15th of the following March, and each of the numbers on the same day of each of the successive nineteen months; which was also to be the date of the payment to him, by Messrs. Chapman & Hall, of twenty several sums of one hundred and fifty pounds each for five years' use of the copyright, the entire ownership in which was then to revert to Dickens. The name of this new book, as all the world knows, was The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby; and between April, 1838, and October, 1839, it was begun and finished accordingly.[146]
The "deed" mentioned was one completed the month before to give him back a one-third ownership in the book that had so far benefited everyone except him. Mr. Edward Chapman describes the original agreement regarding it as follows: "There was no formal contract about Pickwick, only a verbal one. Each issue was to have a sheet and a half, for which we were to pay fifteen guineas; and we paid him for the first two issues upfront because he needed the money to get married. We were also to pay more based on sales, and I think Pickwick ultimately cost us three thousand pounds." Adjustments to the sales would have cost four times that,[145] and I have no record of the actual payments; however, as far as I remember, Mr. Chapman has overstated them. I believe that, in addition to the initial payment for each of the twenty issues (not accounting for the extension beyond the first to thirty-two pages), we issued additional checks as the work continued to sell incredibly well, raising the total received to two thousand five hundred pounds. I consistently emphasized how important it was for him to have some share in the copyright, and this was finally included in the aforementioned deed, even though he wouldn’t gain that right for five years; it was only granted as part of the consideration for another agreement made on the same date (November 19, 1837), in which Dickens agreed to "write a new work, the title of which he would decide, similar in nature and length to the Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club," with the first issue due on March 15 of the following year and subsequent issues on the same date for the next nineteen months; this would also be when Messrs. Chapman & Hall would pay him twenty separate sums of one hundred and fifty pounds each for five years' use of the copyright, after which complete ownership would revert to Dickens. The title of this new book, as everyone knows, was The Life and Adventures of Nicholas Nickleby; and it was begun and completed between April 1838 and October 1839.[146]
All through the interval of these arrangements Oliver Twist had been steadily continued. Month by month, for many months, it had run its opening course with the close of Pickwick, as we shall see it close with the opening of Nickleby; and the expectations of those who had built most confidently on the young novelist were more than confirmed. Here was the interest of a story simply but well constructed; and characters with the same impress of reality upon them, but more carefully and skillfully drawn. Nothing could be meaner than the subject, the progress of a parish or workhouse boy, nothing less so than its treatment. As each number appeared, his readers generally became more and more conscious of what already, as we have seen, had revealed itself amid even the riotous fun of Pickwick, that the purpose was not solely to amuse; and, far more decisively than its predecessor, the new story further showed what were the not least potent elements in the still increasing popularity that was gathering around the writer. His qualities could be appreciated as well as felt in an almost equal degree by all classes of his various readers. Thousands were attracted to him because he placed them in the midst of scenes and characters with which they were already themselves acquainted; and thousands were reading him with no less avidity because he introduced them to passages of nature and life of which they before knew nothing, but of the truth of which their own habits and senses sufficed to assure them. Only to genius are so revealed the affinities and sympathies of high and low, in regard to the customs and usages of life; and only a writer of the first rank can bear the application of such a test.[147] For it is by the alliance of common habits, quite as much as by the bonds of a common humanity, that we are all of us linked together; and the result of being above the necessity of depending on other people's opinions, and that of being below it, are pretty much the same. It would equally startle both high and low to be conscious of the whole that is implied in this close approximation; but for the common enjoyment of which I speak such consciousness is not required; and for the present Fagin may be left undisturbed in his school of practical ethics with only the Dodger, Charley Bates, and his other promising scholars.
Throughout the time these arrangements were made, Oliver Twist continued to be published steadily. Month after month, for many months, it followed its opening path alongside the end of Pickwick, and as we’ll see, it will conclude with the beginning of Nickleby; the expectations of those who had placed their confidence in the young novelist were more than met. Here was a story that was simply, yet effectively constructed, featuring characters that felt real but were drawn with more care and skill. The subject—the story of a parish or workhouse boy—could not be more humble, yet its treatment was anything but. With each issue, readers became increasingly aware of what had already shown itself even amid the wild fun of Pickwick: the purpose was not just to entertain; and more clearly than its predecessor, the new story demonstrated some of the powerful elements contributing to the writer's growing popularity. His qualities could be appreciated as well as felt almost equally by all types of readers. Thousands were drawn to him because he immersed them in scenes and characters they were already familiar with; and thousands read him with equal eagerness because he introduced them to parts of nature and life they had never encountered before, but the truth of which their own experiences and senses confirmed. Only geniuses see the connections and shared feelings of the high and low in relation to the customs and practices of life; and only a top-tier writer can withstand such scrutiny.[147] We are all linked by both our shared habits and our common humanity, and the result of being above the need to rely on others' opinions and being below it feels pretty much the same. Both the high and low would be equally shocked to realize the implications of this close connection; but for the shared enjoyment I’m talking about, such awareness isn’t necessary; and for now, Fagin can remain undisturbed in his school of practical ethics with just the Dodger, Charley Bates, and his other promising students.
With such work as this in hand, it will hardly seem surprising that as the time for beginning Nickleby came on, and as he thought of his promise for November, he should have the sense of "something hanging over him like a hideous nightmare." He felt that he could not complete the Barnaby Rudge novel by the November of that year, as promised, and that the engagement he would have to break was unfitting him for engagements he might otherwise fulfill. He had undertaken what, in truth, was impossible. The labor of at once editing the Miscellany and supplying it with monthly portions of Oliver more than occupied all the time left him by other labors absolutely necessary. "I no sooner get myself up," he wrote, "high and dry, to attack Oliver manfully, than up come the waves of each month's work, and drive me back again into a sea of manuscript." There was nothing for it but that he should make further appeal to Mr. Bentley. "I have recently," he wrote to him on the 11th of February, 1838, "been thinking a great deal about[148] Barnaby Rudge. Grimaldi has occupied so much of the short interval I had between the completion of the Pickwick and the commencement of the new work, that I see it will be wholly impossible for me to produce it by the time I had hoped, with justice to myself or profit to you. What I wish you to consider is this: would it not be far more to your interest, as well as within the scope of my ability, if Barnaby Rudge began in the Miscellany immediately on the conclusion of Oliver Twist, and were continued there for the same time, and then published in three volumes? Take these simple facts into consideration. If the Miscellany is to keep its ground, it must have some continuous tale from me when Oliver stops. If I sat down to Barnaby Rudge, writing a little of it when I could (and with all my other engagements it would necessarily be a very long time before I could hope to finish it that way), it would be clearly impossible for me to begin a new series of papers in the Miscellany. The conduct of three different stories at the same time, and the production of a large portion of each, every month, would have been beyond Scott himself. Whereas, having Barnaby for the Miscellany, we could at once supply the gap which the cessation of Oliver must create, and you would have all the advantage of that prestige in favor of the work which is certain to enhance the value of Oliver Twist considerably. Just think of this at your leisure. I am really anxious to do the best I can for you as well as for myself, and in this case the pecuniary advantage must be all on your side." This letter nevertheless, which had also requested an overdue account of the sales of the Miscellany, led to differences[149] which were only adjusted after six months' wrangling; and I was party to the understanding then arrived at, by which, among other things, Barnaby was placed upon the footing desired, and was to begin when Oliver closed.
With this kind of work on his plate, it’s no surprise that as the time to start Nickleby approached, and as he thought about his promise for November, he felt a sense of “something looming over him like a terrible nightmare.” He realized he couldn’t finish the Barnaby Rudge novel by that November as promised, and the commitment he would have to break was making it harder for him to take on other commitments he might be able to fulfill. He had taken on what was really impossible. The task of editing the Miscellany and providing it with monthly installments of Oliver consumed all the time left for other necessary work. “As soon as I get myself set up,” he wrote, “ready to tackle Oliver head-on, the waves of each month’s work come crashing in, dragging me back into a sea of manuscript.” He had no choice but to reach out to Mr. Bentley again. “I have recently,” he wrote to him on February 11, 1838, “been doing a lot of thinking about[148] Barnaby Rudge. Grimaldi took up so much of the short time I had between finishing Pickwick and starting the new project, that I see it will be entirely impossible for me to produce it by the time I had hoped, with fairness to myself or benefit to you. What I’d like you to think about is this: wouldn’t it be much more in your interest, and within my ability, if Barnaby Rudge started in the Miscellany right after Oliver Twist ends, continued there for the same duration, and then published in three volumes? Consider these simple facts. If the Miscellany is going to hold its ground, it must have some ongoing story from me when Oliver wraps up. If I sat down to write Barnaby Rudge, working on it whenever I could (and with all my other commitments, it would take me a very long time to finish it that way), it would be utterly impossible for me to start a new series in the Miscellany. Managing three different stories simultaneously, and producing a large portion of each every month, would have been beyond even Scott. However, by having Barnaby in the Miscellany, we could immediately fill the gap that Oliver’s end would create, and you would benefit from the boost in prestige that would surely enhance the value of Oliver Twist significantly. Just think about this when you have time. I’m genuinely eager to do my best for both of us, and in this situation, the financial advantage has to be all in your favor.” This letter, which also asked for an overdue report on the sales of the Miscellany, led to disputes[149] that were only resolved after six months of arguing; and I was part of the agreement that resulted, which, among other things, put Barnaby on the desired path, set to begin when Oliver ended.
Of the progress of his Oliver, and his habits of writing at the time, it may perhaps be worth giving some additional glimpses from his letters of 1838. "I was thinking about Oliver till dinner-time yesterday," he wrote on the 9th of March,[15] "and, just as I had fallen upon him tooth and nail, was called away to sit with Kate. I did eight slips, however, and hope to make them fifteen this morning." Three days before, a little daughter had been born to him, who became a little god-daughter to me; on which occasion (having closed his announcement with a postscript of "I can do nothing this morning. What time will you ride? The sooner the better, for a good long spell"), we rode out fifteen miles on the great north road, and, after dining at the Red Lion in Barnet on our way home, distinguished the already memorable day by bringing in both hacks dead lame.
Of the progress of his Oliver and his writing routine at the time, it might be worth sharing some insights from his letters in 1838. "I was thinking about Oliver until dinner time yesterday," he wrote on March 9th,[15] "and just as I was getting into it, I was called away to sit with Kate. I did eight drafts, though, and I hope to make them fifteen this morning." Three days earlier, he welcomed a little daughter into the world, who later became my goddaughter; on that occasion (he ended his announcement with a note saying, "I can't do anything this morning. What time will you ride? The sooner the better, for a good long spell"), we rode out fifteen miles on the main north road, and after having dinner at the Red Lion in Barnet on our way home, we marked the already memorable day by bringing both horses back dead lame.
On that day week, Monday, the 13th, after describing[150] himself "sitting patiently at home waiting for Oliver Twist who has not yet arrived," which was his pleasant form of saying that his fancy had fallen into sluggishness that morning, he made addition not less pleasant as to some piece of painful news I had sent him, now forgotten: "I have not yet seen the paper, and you throw me into a fever. The comfort is, that all the strange and terrible things come uppermost, and that the good and pleasant things are mixed up with every moment of our existence so plentifully that we scarcely heed them." At the close of the month Mrs. Dickens was well enough to accompany him to Richmond, for now the time was come to start Nickleby; and, having been away from town when Pickwick's first number came out, he made it a superstition to be absent at all future similar times. The magazine-day of that April month, I remember, fell upon a Saturday, and the previous evening had brought me a peremptory summons: "Meet me at the Shakspeare on Saturday night at eight; order your horse at midnight, and ride back with me." Which was done accordingly. The smallest hour was sounding from St. Paul's into the night before we started, and the night was none of the pleasantest; but we carried news that lightened every part of the road, for the sale of Nickleby had reached that day the astonishing number of nearly fifty thousand! I left him working with unusual cheerfulness at Oliver Twist when I left the Star and Garter on the next day but one, after celebrating with both friends on the previous evening an anniversary[16] which concerned[151] us all (their second and my twenty-sixth), and which we kept always in future at the same place, except when they were living out of England, for twenty successive years. It was a part of his love of regularity and order, as well as of his kindliness of nature, to place such friendly meetings as these under rules of habit and continuance.
On that Monday, the 13th, after explaining[150] that he was "sitting patiently at home waiting for Oliver Twist who hasn’t arrived yet," which was his way of saying he was feeling a bit sluggish that morning, he added something else that made me smile about some painful news I had sent him, which he had now forgotten: "I haven't seen the paper yet, and you've got me all anxious. The bright side is, that all the strange and terrible things get the most attention, while the good and pleasant things are so mixed into our daily lives that we barely notice them." By the end of the month, Mrs. Dickens was well enough to join him in Richmond, as it was time to begin Nickleby; and, having been away from town when the first issue of Pickwick came out, he developed a superstition about being absent during all future releases. I remember that the magazine day in April fell on a Saturday, and the evening before I received a firm request: "Meet me at the Shakspeare on Saturday night at eight; order your horse for midnight, and ride back with me." And so it was done. The clock was striking the smallest hour from St. Paul’s into the night when we set off, and it wasn’t the most pleasant night; but we carried news that brightened our journey, as the sales of Nickleby that day had reached an incredible nearly fifty thousand copies! I left him working with an unusual cheerfulness on Oliver Twist when I left the Star and Garter two days later, after celebrating with both friends the night before an anniversary[16] that was important to[151] all of us (their second and my twenty-sixth), which we always celebrated in the same place for twenty years, except when they were living abroad. It was part of his love for routine and order, as well as his kindness, to establish these friendly gatherings with consistent traditions.
CHAPTER VIII.
OLIVER TWIST.
1838.
The whole of his time not occupied by Nickleby was now given to Oliver, and as the story shaped itself to its close it took extraordinary hold of him. I never knew him work so frequently after dinner, or to such late hours (a practice he afterwards abhorred), as during the final months of this task; which it was now his hope to complete before October, though its close in the magazine would not be due until the following March. "I worked pretty well last night," he writes, referring to it in May, "very well indeed; but, although I did eleven close slips before half-past twelve, I have four to write to complete the chapter; and, as I foolishly left them till this morning, have the steam to get up afresh."[153] A month later he writes, "I got to the sixteenth slip last night, and shall try hard to get to the thirtieth before I go to bed."[17] Then, on a "Tuesday night," at the opening of August, he wrote, "Hard at work still. Nancy is no more. I showed what I have done to Kate last night, who was in an unspeakable 'state:' from which and my own impression I augur well. When I have sent Sikes to the devil, I must have yours." "No, no," he wrote, in the following month: "don't, don't let us ride till to-morrow, not having yet disposed of the Jew, who is such an out-and-outer that I don't know what to make of him." No small difficulty to an inventor, where the creatures of his invention are found to be as real as himself; but this also was mastered; and then there remained but the closing quiet chapter to tell the fortunes of those who had figured in the tale. To this he summoned me in the first week of September, replying to a request of mine that he'd give me a call that day: "Come and give me a call, and let us have 'a bit o' talk' before we have a bit o' som'at else. My missis is going out to dinner, and I ought to go, but I have got a bad cold. So do you come, and sit here, and read, or work, or do something, while I write the LAST chapter of Oliver, which will be arter a lamb chop." How well I remember that evening! and our talk of what should be the fate of Charley Bates, on behalf of whom (as indeed for the Dodger too) Talfourd[154] had pleaded as earnestly in mitigation of judgment as ever at the bar for any client he had most respected.
The entire time he wasn't working on Nickleby was now dedicated to Oliver, and as the story moved toward its conclusion, it captivated him in an extraordinary way. I had never seen him work so often after dinner or late into the night (a habit he later despised) as during the final months of this project; he hoped to finish it before October, even though its final installment in the magazine wouldn’t be due until the following March. "I worked pretty well last night," he wrote in May, "very well indeed; but even though I managed eleven pages before half-past midnight, I still have four more to write to finish the chapter; and because I foolishly left them for this morning, I need to get energized again."[153] A month later he wrote, "I got to the sixteenth page last night, and I'll try hard to reach the thirtieth before I go to bed."[17] Then, on a "Tuesday night" at the beginning of August, he wrote, "Still hard at work. Nancy is gone. I showed what I had done to Kate last night, who was in an indescribable 'state:' from which, along with my own impression, I feel optimistic. Once I send Sikes to his demise, I need your input." "No, no," he wrote the next month, "don't, let's not ride until tomorrow, since I haven't dealt with the Jew, who is such an extreme character that I don't even know how to handle him." It’s no small challenge for a creator when the characters of his imagination feel as real as he does; but he managed that too, and then there was just the final quiet chapter left to reveal the fates of those who had featured in the story. He called me in the first week of September, responding to my request for him to visit that day: "Come over and see me, and let’s have 'a bit o' talk' before we have a bit of something else. My wife's going out to dinner, and I should go, but I’ve got a bad cold. So why don’t you come, and sit here, and read, or work, or do something while I write the LAST chapter of Oliver, which will be after a lamb chop." How well I remember that evening! And our discussion about what should happen to Charley Bates, for whom (as indeed for the Dodger too) Talfourd[154] had advocated just as passionately in seeking a lighter sentence as he ever had for any client he held in high regard.
The publication had been announced for October, but the third-volume illustrations intercepted it a little. This part of the story, as we have seen, had been written in anticipation of the magazine, and the designs for it, having to be executed "in a lump," were necessarily done somewhat hastily. The matter supplied in advance of the monthly portions in the magazine formed the bulk of the last volume as published in the book; and for this the plates had to be prepared by Cruikshank also in advance of the magazine, to furnish them in time for the separate publication: Sikes and his dog, Fagin in the cell, and Rose Maylie and Oliver, being the three last. None of these Dickens had seen until he saw them in the book on the eve of its publication; when he so strongly objected to one of them that it had to be canceled. "I returned suddenly to town yesterday afternoon," he wrote to the artist at the end of October, "to look at the latter pages of Oliver Twist before it was delivered to the booksellers, when I saw the majority of the plates in the last volume for the first time. With reference to the last one,—Rose Maylie and Oliver,—without entering into the question of great haste, or any other cause, which may have led to its being what it is, I am quite sure there can be little difference of opinion between us with respect to the result. May I ask you whether you will object to designing this plate afresh, and doing so at once, in order that as few impressions as possible of the present one may go forth? I feel confident you[155] know me too well to feel hurt by this inquiry, and with equal confidence in you I have lost no time in preferring it." This letter, printed from a copy in Dickens's handwriting fortunately committed to my keeping, entirely disposes of a wonderful story[18] originally promulgated[156] in America with a minute particularity of detail that might have raised the reputation of Sir Benjamin Backbite himself. Whether all Sir Benjamin's laurels, however, should fall to the person by whom the tale is told,[19] or whether any part belongs to the authority alleged for it, is unfortunately not quite clear. There would hardly have been a doubt, if the fable had been confined to the other side of the Atlantic; but it has been reproduced and widely circulated on this side also; and the distinguished artist whom it calumniates by attributing the invention to him has been left undefended from its slander. Dickens's letter spares me the necessity of characterizing, by the only word which would have been applicable to it, a tale of such incredible and monstrous absurdity as that one of the masterpieces of its author's genius had been merely an illustration of etchings by Mr. Cruikshank!
The publication was set for October, but the illustrations for the third volume delayed it a bit. This part of the story, as we've seen, had been written in anticipation of the magazine, and the designs for it, needing to be done "in a lump," were necessarily created somewhat quickly. The material supplied ahead of the monthly magazine content made up most of the last volume as it was published in the book; for this, Cruikshank also had to prepare the plates in advance of the magazine to provide them on time for the separate publication: Sikes and his dog, Fagin in the cell, and Rose Maylie with Oliver were the last three. Dickens hadn’t seen any of these until he saw them in the book right before its publication; he objected so strongly to one of them that it had to be canceled. "I returned suddenly to town yesterday afternoon,” he wrote to the artist at the end of October, “to check the last pages of Oliver Twist before it went to the booksellers, and I saw most of the plates in the last volume for the first time. Regarding the last one—Rose Maylie and Oliver—without getting into the reasons that may have led to its current state, I’m pretty sure we won’t see eye to eye on the result. May I ask if you would be willing to redesign this plate from scratch and do so right away, so that as few copies of the current version can be printed? I’m confident you know me well enough not to take offense at this request, and with the same confidence in you, I’ve wasted no time in making it." This letter, taken from a copy in Dickens's handwriting that I’m fortunate to have, completely dismisses a fantastic story[18] originally spread in America with such detailed specifics that it could have boosted the reputation of Sir Benjamin Backbite himself. However, whether all of Sir Benjamin’s honors should go to the storyteller,[19] or if any part belongs to the authority claimed for it, is unfortunately unclear. There would hardly be any doubt if the tale had stayed on the other side of the Atlantic; but it's been reproduced and widely shared on this side as well; and the distinguished artist it maligns by attributing the invention to him has been left vulnerable to its defamation. Dickens's letter saves me from having to describe, with the only word that fits, a story so incredibly absurd as to suggest that one of his masterpieces was merely an illustration of etchings by Mr. Cruikshank!
The completed Oliver Twist found a circle of admirers, not so wide in its range as those of others of his books, but of a character and mark that made their honest liking for it, and steady advocacy of it, important to his fame; and the book has held its ground in the first class of his writings. It deserves that place. The admitted exaggerations in Pickwick are incident[157] to its club's extravaganza of adventure, of which they are part, and are easily separable from the reality of its wit and humor, and its incomparable freshness; but no such allowances were needed here. Make what deduction the too scrupulous reader of Oliver might please for "lowness" in the subject, the precision and the unexaggerated force of the delineation were not to be disputed. The art of copying from nature as it really exists in the common walks had not been carried by any one to greater perfection, or to better results in the way of combination. Such was his handling of the piece of solid, existing, every-day life, which he made here the groundwork of his wit and tenderness, that the book which did much to help out of the world the social evils it portrayed will probably preserve longest the picture of them as they then were. Thus far, indeed, he had written nothing to which in a greater or less degree this felicity did not belong. At the time of which I am speaking, the debtors' prisons described in Pickwick, the parochial management denounced in Oliver, and the Yorkshire schools exposed in Nickleby, were all actual existences,—which now have no vivider existence than in the forms he thus gave to them. With wiser purposes, he superseded the old petrifying process of the magician in the Arabian tale, and struck the prisons and parish abuses of his country, and its schools of neglect and crime, into palpable life forever. A portion of the truth of the past, of the character and very history of the moral abuses of his time, will thus remain always in his writings; and it will be remembered that with only[158] the light arms of humor and laughter, and the gentle ones of pathos and sadness, he carried cleansing and reform into those Augean stables.
The finished Oliver Twist gained a group of fans, not as large as those of some of his other books, but their genuine appreciation and consistent support were crucial to his reputation; the book has maintained its status among his best works. It deserves that recognition. The acknowledged exaggerations in Pickwick are part of its club's wild adventures, which can be easily separated from its sharp wit and humor, and its unmatched freshness; however, no such allowances were necessary here. Whatever criticism the overly meticulous reader of Oliver might make about its "low" subject matter, the accuracy and true impact of its description were undeniable. No one has achieved a better or more effective portrayal of everyday life as it really is. His portrayal of real, daily experiences became the foundation for his humor and compassion, and the book that helped highlight the social issues it depicted will likely keep the image of those times alive the longest. Up to that point, he hadn't written anything that didn't showcase this remarkable quality to some extent. At the time I’m referencing, the debtor's prisons described in Pickwick, the poor management criticized in Oliver, and the Yorkshire schools exposed in Nickleby were all real places—now they only live on vividly through his portrayal. With wise intentions, he replaced the old method of freezing reality, like a magician from Arabian tales, and brought the prisons and social issues of his country, along with its neglectful and criminal schools, to vivid life forever. A part of the truth of the past, the character and actual history of the moral failures of his era will always be found in his writings; and it will be remembered that with nothing more than the gentle tools of humor and laughter, along with the soft touches of pathos and sadness, he brought about change and reform in those dire situations.
Not that such intentions are in any degree ever intruded by this least didactic of writers. It is the fact that teaches, and not any sermonizing drawn from it. Oliver Twist is the history of a child born in a workhouse and brought up by parish overseers, and there is nothing introduced that is out of keeping with the design. It is a series of pictures from the tragi-comedy of lower life, worked out by perfectly natural agencies, from the dying mother and the starved wretches of the first volume, through the scenes and gradations of crime, careless or deliberate, which have a frightful consummation in the last volume, but are never without the reliefs and self-assertions of humanity even in scenes and among characters so debased. It is indeed the primary purpose of the tale to show its little hero, jostled as he is in the miserable crowd, preserved everywhere from the vice of its pollution by an exquisite delicacy of natural sentiment which clings to him under every disadvantage. There is not a more masterly touch in fiction, and it is by such that this delightful fancy is consistently worked out to the last, than Oliver's agony of childish grief on being brought away from the branch-workhouse, the wretched home associated only with suffering and starvation, and with no kind word or look, but containing still his little companions in misery.
Not that this least preachy of writers ever forces such intentions. It’s the reality that teaches, not any sermon drawn from it. Oliver Twist tells the story of a child born in a workhouse and raised by parish overseers, and everything included fits the overall design. It’s a series of snapshots from the tragic-comedy of low life, depicted by completely natural forces, from the dying mother and the starving wretches in the first volume, through the scenes and stages of crime, whether careless or intentional, that culminate terrifyingly in the last volume, yet are never without the touches of humanity even amid such degraded situations and characters. The main goal of the story is to show its little hero, who, despite being jostled in the miserable crowd, is everywhere kept from the pollution of vice by a delicate natural sentiment that clings to him through every hardship. There’s no better moment in fiction, and it’s through such moments that this delightful narrative unfolds consistently to the end, than Oliver's heartbreaking childhood grief when he’s taken away from the branch workhouse, that miserable home tied only to suffering and starvation, devoid of any kind word or kind look, yet still containing his little companions in misery.
Of the figures the book has made familiar to every one it is not my purpose to speak. To name one or two will be enough. Bumble and his wife; Charley[159] Bates and the Artful Dodger; the cowardly charity-boy, Noah Claypole, whose Such agony, please, sir, puts the whole of a school-life into one phrase; the so-called merry old Jew, supple and black-hearted Fagin; and Bill Sikes, the bolder-faced bulky-legged ruffian, with his white hat and white shaggy dog,—who does not know them all, even to the least points of dress, look, and walk, and all the small peculiarities that express great points of character? I have omitted poor wretched Nancy; yet it is to be said of her, with such honest truthfulness her strength and weakness are shown, in the virtue that lies neighbored in her nature so closely by vice, that the people meant to be entirely virtuous show poorly beside her. But, though Rose and her lover are trivial enough beside Bill and his mistress, being indeed the weak part of the story, it is the book's pre-eminent merit that vice is nowhere made attractive in it. Crime is not more intensely odious, all through, than it is also most wretched and most unhappy. Not merely when its exposure comes, when the latent recesses of guilt are laid bare, and all the agonies of remorse are witnessed; not in the great scenes only, but in those lighter passages where no such aim might seem to have guided the apparently careless hand, this is emphatically so. Whether it be the comedy or the tragedy of crime, terror and retribution dog closely at its heels. They are as plainly visible when Fagin is first shown in his den, boiling the coffee in the saucepan and stopping every now and then to listen when there is the least noise below,—the villainous confidence of habit never extinguishing in him the anxious watchings and listenings of crime,—as[160] when we see him at the last in the condemned cell, like a poisoned human rat in a hole.
Of the characters this book has made known to everyone, I won’t go into detail. Just mentioning a few is enough. Bumble and his wife; Charley[159] Bates and the Artful Dodger; the cowardly charity boy, Noah Claypole, whose Such agony, please, sir captures a whole school life in one phrase; the so-called merry old Jew, the cunning and cold-hearted Fagin; and Bill Sikes, the brash, heavy-set thug with his white hat and shaggy white dog—who doesn’t know them all, even the smallest details about their clothing, appearance, and mannerisms, and all the little quirks that reveal their true character? I’ve left out poor wretched Nancy; yet it must be said that her strength and weakness are presented with such honesty, in the virtue that is so closely intertwined with her vice, that those meant to be purely virtuous pale in comparison. But while Rose and her lover are pretty insignificant next to Bill and his mistress, really being the weaker part of the story, the book’s greatest strength is that vice is never made appealing. Crime is portrayed as incredibly loathsome throughout, as well as utterly miserable and unhappy. This remains true not just when the crime is exposed, showing the hidden depths of guilt and the agonies of remorse, but in the lighter moments where it seems that no such purpose guided the seemingly casual writing. Whether it’s the comedy or the tragedy of crime, fear and punishment are always close behind. They are as noticeable when Fagin is first introduced in his lair, boiling coffee in a saucepan and pausing to listen at every little sound below—the villainous confidence from his past habits never masking the anxious watchfulness of a criminal—as[160] when we see him at the end in the condemned cell, like a poisoned rat trapped in a hole.
A word may be added upon the attacks directed against the subject of the book, to which Dickens made reply in one of his later editions, declaring his belief that he had tried to do a service to society, and had certainly done no disservice, in depicting a knot of such associates in crime in all their deformity and squalid wretchedness, skulking uneasily through a miserable life to a painful and shameful death. It is, indeed, never the subject that can be objectionable, if the treatment is not so, as we may see by much popular writing since, where subjects unimpeachably high are brought low by degrading sensualism. When the object of a writer is to exhibit the vulgarity of vice, and not its pretensions to heroism or cravings for sympathy, he may measure his subject with the highest. We meet with a succession of swindlers and thieves in Gil Blas; we shake hands with highwaymen and housebreakers all round in the Beggars' Opera; we pack cards with La Ruse or pick pockets with Jonathan in Fielding's Mr. Wild the Great; we follow cruelty and vice from its least beginning to its grossest ends in the prints of Hogarth; but our morals stand none the looser for any of them. As the spirit of the Frenchman was pure enjoyment, the strength of the Englishmen lay in wisdom and satire. The low was set forth to pull down the false pretensions of the high. And though for the most part they differ in manner and design from Dickens in this tale, desiring less to discover the soul of goodness in things evil than to brand the stamp of evil on things apt to pass for good, their objects and results are substantially the same.[161] Familiar with the lowest kind of abasement of life, the knowledge is used, by both him and them, to teach what constitutes its essential elevation; and by the very coarseness and vulgarity of the materials employed we measure the gentlemanliness and beauty of the work that is done. The quack in morality will always call such writing immoral, and the impostors will continue to complain of its treatment of imposture, but for the rest of the world it will still teach the invaluable lesson of what men ought to be from what they are. We cannot learn it more than enough. We cannot too often be told that as the pride and grandeur of mere external circumstance is the falsest of earthly things, so the truth of virtue in the heart is the most lovely and lasting; and from the pages of Oliver Twist this teaching is once again to be taken by all who will look for it there.
A few words can be added about the criticism aimed at the subject of this book, to which Dickens responded in one of his later editions. He expressed his belief that he attempted to do a service to society and certainly did no harm by illustrating a group of criminal associates in all their deformity and miserable existence, shuffling through a pitiful life to a painful and shameful end. Indeed, it’s never the subject itself that is objectionable if the treatment isn’t, as evidenced by much popular writing since then, where commendable subjects are dragged down by degrading sensuality. When a writer aims to showcase the vulgarity of vice and not its claims to heroism or need for sympathy, they can certainly tackle even the highest subjects. We encounter a series of con artists and thieves in Gil Blas; we shake hands with robbers and burglars throughout the Beggars' Opera; we play cards with La Ruse or pick pockets with Jonathan in Fielding's Mr. Wild the Great; we track the progression of cruelty and vice from its smallest beginnings to its most grotesque ends in Hogarth's prints; yet our morals aren't weakened by any of it. While the Frenchman's spirit was all about pure enjoyment, the strength of the Englishmen lay in wisdom and satire. The low was showcased to undermine the false pretensions of the high. And although they generally differ in style and intent from Dickens in this story, aiming less to find the goodness within evil than to highlight the evil in things that might seem good, their goals and outcomes are fundamentally the same.[161] Familiar with the lowest forms of life's degradation, both he and others use this knowledge to teach what constitutes true elevation; and through the very coarseness and vulgarity of the subjects handled, we can measure the refinement and beauty of the work produced. The charlatan in morality will always label such writing as immoral, and the frauds will keep complaining about its depiction of imposture, but to the rest of the world, it will continue to impart the invaluable lesson of what men should be based on what they truly are. We can’t be reminded of this enough. We can’t hear too often that, just as the pride and grandeur of mere external circumstance are the most deceptive of earthly things, the truth of virtue in the heart is the most beautiful and enduring; and from the pages of Oliver Twist, this lesson can again be learned by anyone willing to seek it out.
And now, while Oliver was running a great career of popularity and success, the shadow of the tale of Barnaby Rudge, which he was to write on similar terms, and to begin in the Miscellany when the other should have ended, began to darken everything around him. We had much discussion respecting it, and I had no small difficulty in restraining him from throwing up the agreement altogether; but the real hardship of his position, and the considerate construction to be placed on every effort made by him to escape from obligations incurred in ignorance of the sacrifices implied by them, will be best understood from his own frank and honest statement. On the 21st of January, 1839, inclosing me the copy of a letter which he proposed to send to Mr. Bentley the following morning, he thus wrote: "From what I have already said to you, you will have[162] been led to expect that I entertained some such intention. I know you will not endeavor to dissuade me from sending it. Go it must. It is no fiction to say that at present I cannot write this tale. The immense profits which Oliver has realized to its publisher and is still realizing; the paltry, wretched, miserable sum it brought to me (not equal to what is every day paid for a novel that sells fifteen hundred copies at most); the recollection of this, and the consciousness that I have still the slavery and drudgery of another work on the same journeyman-terms; the consciousness that my books are enriching everybody connected with them but myself, and that I, with such a popularity as I have acquired, am struggling in old toils, and wasting my energies in the very height and freshness of my fame, and the best part of my life, to fill the pockets of others, while for those who are nearest and dearest to me I can realize little more than a genteel subsistence: all this puts me out of heart and spirits. And I cannot—cannot and will not—under such circumstances that keep me down with an iron hand, distress myself by beginning this tale until I have had time to breathe, and until the intervention of the summer, and some cheerful days in the country, shall have restored me to a more genial and composed state of feeling. There—for six months Barnaby Rudge stands over. And but for you, it should stand over altogether. For I do most solemnly declare that morally, before God and man, I hold myself released from such hard bargains as these, after I have done so much for those who drove them. This net that has been wound about me so chafes me, so exasperates and irritates my mind, that to break it[163] at whatever cost—that I should care nothing for—is my constant impulse. But I have not yielded to it. I merely declare that I must have a postponement very common in all literary agreements; and for the time I have mentioned—six months from the conclusion of Oliver in the Miscellany—I wash my hands of any fresh accumulation of labor, and resolve to proceed as cheerfully as I can with that which already presses upon me."[20]
And now, while Oliver was enjoying a huge surge of popularity and success, the looming shadow of the story Barnaby Rudge, which he was set to write under similar conditions and start in the Miscellany when the other was done, began to overshadow everything around him. We had a lot of discussions about it, and I struggled to keep him from abandoning the agreement entirely; but the true difficulty of his situation, and the understanding needed for every effort he made to escape from commitments made without knowing the sacrifices they entailed, will be best illustrated by his own candid and honest words. On January 21, 1839, enclosing a copy of the letter he planned to send to Mr. Bentley the next morning, he wrote: "From what I’ve already said to you, you might expect that I have some intention like this. I know you won’t try to talk me out of sending it. It has to go. It’s not an exaggeration to say that right now I cannot write this story. The huge profits that Oliver has brought in for its publisher and keeps bringing in; the pathetic, miserable amount it gave me (not even close to what is typically paid for a novel that sells at most fifteen hundred copies); the memory of this, and the awareness that I'm still stuck with the grind of another work under the same terrible terms; the realization that my books are making everyone involved rich except me, and that I, with the popularity I’ve gained, am struggling in old traps and wasting my energy at the height and freshness of my fame, and the best years of my life, just to line other people's pockets, while for those who mean the most to me I can barely provide a decent living: all this drains my spirit and motivation. And I cannot—cannot and will not—under these circumstances that hold me down so tightly, distress myself by starting this story until I’ve had time to breathe, and until the summer comes, bringing some cheerful days in the countryside to restore me to a more positive and calm state of mind. There—for six months Barnaby Rudge is on hold. And if it weren’t for you, it would be on hold altogether. For I seriously declare that morally, before God and man, I consider myself free from such harsh agreements after I’ve done so much for those who pushed them. This net that has been thrown around me irks me so much, so infuriates and annoys my mind, that breaking it—that I wouldn’t care about at all—is my constant urge. But I haven’t given in to it. I only state that I must have a postponement, very common in all literary agreements; and for the time I've mentioned—six months from the end of Oliver in the Miscellany—I wash my hands of any new accumulation of work and resolve to handle as cheerfully as I can what is already pressing on me."[20]
To describe what followed upon this is not necessary. It will suffice to state the results. Upon the appearance in the Miscellany, in the early months of 1839, of the last portion of Oliver Twist, its author, having been relieved altogether from his engagement to the magazine, handed over, in a familiar epistle from a parent to his child, the editorship to Mr. Ainsworth; and the still subsisting agreement to write Barnaby Rudge was, upon the overture of Mr. Bentley himself in June of the following year, 1840, also put an end to, on payment by Dickens, for the copyright of Oliver Twist and such printed stock as remained of[164] the edition then on hand, of two thousand two hundred and fifty pounds. What was further incident to this transaction will be told hereafter; and a few words may meanwhile be taken, not without significance in regard to it, from the parent's familiar epistle. It describes the child as aged two years and two months (so long had he watched over it); gives sundry pieces of advice concerning its circulation, and the importance thereto of light and pleasant articles of food; and concludes, after some general moralizing on the shiftings and changes of this world having taken so wonderful a turn that mail-coach guards were become no longer judges of horse-flesh, "I reap no gain or profit by parting from you, nor will any conveyance of your property be required, for in this respect you have always been literally Bentley's Miscellany and never mine."
It’s unnecessary to describe what happened next. It’s enough to state the results. When the last part of *Oliver Twist* appeared in the *Miscellany* in early 1839, its author, having completely stepped away from his commitment to the magazine, handed over the editorship to Mr. Ainsworth in a casual letter like one from a parent to a child. The ongoing agreement to write *Barnaby Rudge* was also ended in June of the following year, 1840, at the suggestion of Mr. Bentley himself, with Dickens paying two thousand two hundred and fifty pounds for the copyright of *Oliver Twist* and any remaining printed stock from the edition at hand. More details about this transaction will be shared later; meanwhile, some relevant remarks can be taken from the parent’s casual letter. It mentions the child being two years and two months old (which is how long he had looked after it), offers various pieces of advice regarding its circulation and the importance of light and enjoyable content, and concludes, after some general reflections on how the world changes so remarkably that mail-coach guards are no longer the experts on horses, “I gain nothing by separating from you, nor will there be any need for you to convey your property, for in this matter you have always been literally Bentley's Miscellany and never mine.”
CHAPTER IX.
NICHOLAS NICKLEBY.
1838-1839.
I well recollect the doubt there was, mixed with the eager expectation which the announcement of his second serial story had awakened, whether the event would justify all that interest, and if indeed it were possible that the young writer could continue to walk steadily under the burden of the popularity laid upon him. The first number dispersed this cloud of a question in a burst of sunshine; and as much of the gayety of nations as had been eclipsed by old Mr. Pickwick's voluntary exile to Dulwich was restored by the cheerful confidence with which young Mr. Nicholas Nickleby stepped into his shoes. Everything that had given charm to the first book was here, with more attention to the important[166] requisite of a story, and more wealth as well as truth of character.
I understand remember the uncertainty mixed with the eager anticipation that the announcement of his second serial story had sparked, wondering if the story would live up to all that interest and whether the young writer could keep up under the weight of his newfound popularity. The first issue swept away this cloud of doubt in a burst of brightness; and as much of the joy of society that had been dimmed by old Mr. Pickwick's voluntary retreat to Dulwich was restored by the upbeat confidence with which young Mr. Nicholas Nickleby stepped into his role. Everything that had made the first book charming was present here, with more focus on the essential[166] aspects of storytelling, along with richer and more authentic character development.
How this was poured forth in each successive number, it hardly needs that I should tell. To recall it now, is to talk of what since has so interwoven itself with common speech and thought as to have become almost part of the daily life of us all. It was well said of him, soon after his death, in mentioning how largely his compositions had furnished one of the chief sources of intellectual enjoyment to this generation, that his language had become part of the language of every class and rank of his countrymen, and his characters were a portion of our contemporaries. "It seems scarcely possible," continued this otherwise not too indulgent commentator, "to believe that there never were any such persons as Mr. Pickwick and Mrs. Nickleby and Mrs. Gamp. They are to us not only types of English life, but types actually existing. They at once revealed the existence of such people, and made them thoroughly comprehensible. They were not studies of persons, but persons. And yet they were idealized in the sense that the reader did not think that they were drawn from the life. They were alive; they were themselves." The writer might have added that this is proper to all true masters of fiction who work in the higher regions of their calling.
How this was expressed in each issue, I hardly need to explain. Remembering it now is like discussing something that has become so deeply woven into everyday language and thought that it feels like a part of our daily lives. After his death, it was rightly pointed out how much his works had provided one of the main sources of intellectual enjoyment for this generation; his language became part of the speech of every class and rank among his countrymen, and his characters felt like real people in our lives. "It seems hardly believable," continued this otherwise not overly generous critic, "that there were never people like Mr. Pickwick and Mrs. Nickleby and Mrs. Gamp. To us, they are not only representations of English life but actual types of people we know. They revealed the existence of such individuals and made them fully understandable. They were not mere studies of characters; they were real people. Yet they were idealized in a way that the reader wouldn't assume they were based on real life. They felt alive; they were themselves." The writer might have added that this quality is characteristic of all true masters of fiction who reach the higher levels of their craft.
Nothing certainly could express better what the new book was at this time making manifest to its thousands of readers; not simply an astonishing variety in the creations of character, but what it was that made these creations so real; not merely the writer's wealth of genius, but the secret and form of his art. There[167] never was any one who had less need to talk about his characters, because never were characters so surely revealed by themselves; and it was thus their reality made itself felt at once. They talked so well that everybody took to repeating what they said, as the writer just quoted has pointed out; and the sayings being the constituent elements of the characters, these also of themselves became part of the public. This, which must always be a novelist's highest achievement, was the art carried to exquisite perfection on a more limited stage by Miss Austen; and, under widely different conditions both of art and work, it was pre-eminently that of Dickens. I told him, on reading the first dialogue of Mrs. Nickleby and Miss Knag, that he had been lately reading Miss Bates in Emma, but I found that he had not at this time made the acquaintance of that fine writer.
Nothing could better express what the new book was revealing to its thousands of readers at this time; not just an incredible variety in character creation, but what made these characters feel so real; not only the writer's immense talent, but the essence and structure of his craft. There[167] was never anyone who needed to discuss their characters less because they were so clearly presented in their own right; and it was this clarity that made their reality instantly felt. They were such great conversationalists that everyone started quoting them, as the writer mentioned; and these quotes, being the core of the characters, became part of the public consciousness. This, which should always be a novelist's greatest accomplishment, was the art brought to exquisite perfection on a smaller scale by Miss Austen; and, under very different artistic and contextual circumstances, it was distinctly that of Dickens. I mentioned to him, after reading the first dialogue between Mrs. Nickleby and Miss Knag, that he had recently been reading Miss Bates in Emma, but I discovered that he hadn't yet had the chance to get to know that wonderful writer.
Who that recollects the numbers of Nickleby as they appeared can have forgotten how each number added to the general enjoyment? All that had given Pickwick its vast popularity, the overflowing mirth, hearty exuberance of humor, and genial kindliness of satire, had here the advantage of a better-laid design, more connected incidents, and greater precision of character. Everybody seemed immediately to know the Nickleby family as well as his own. Dotheboys, with all that rendered it, like a piece by Hogarth, both ludicrous and terrible, became a household word. Successive groups of Mantalinis, Kenwigses, Crummleses, introduced each its little world of reality, lighted up everywhere with truth and life, with capital observation, the quaintest drollery, and quite boundless mirth and fun.[168] The brothers Cheeryble brought with them all the charities. With Smike came the first of those pathetic pictures that filled the world with pity for what cruelty, ignorance, or neglect may inflict upon the young. And Newman Noggs ushered in that class of the creatures of his fancy in which he took himself perhaps the most delight, and which the oftener he dealt with the more he seemed to know how to vary and render attractive: gentlemen by nature, however shocking bad their hats or ungenteel their dialects; philosophers of modest endurance, and needy but most respectable coats; a sort of humble angels of sympathy and self-denial, though without a particle of splendor or even good looks about them, except what an eye as fine as their own feelings might discern. "My friends," wrote Sydney Smith, describing to Dickens the anxiety of some ladies of his acquaintance to meet him at dinner, "have not the smallest objection to be put into a number, but on the contrary would be proud of the distinction; and Lady Charlotte, in particular, you may marry to Newman Noggs." Lady Charlotte was not a more real person to Sydney than Newman Noggs; and all the world that Dickens attracted to his books could draw from them the same advantage as the man of wit and genius. It has been lately objected that humanity is not seen in them in its highest or noblest types, and the assertion may hereafter be worth considering; but what is very certain is, that they have inculcated humanity in familiar and engaging forms to thousands and tens of thousands of their readers, who can hardly have failed each to make his little world around him somewhat the better for their teaching. From first to last they were[169] never for a moment alien to either the sympathies or the understandings of any class; and there were crowds of people at this time that could not have told you what imagination meant, who were adding month by month to their limited stores the boundless gains of imagination.
Who that remembers the episodes of Nickleby as they were published can forget how each one contributed to the overall enjoyment? Everything that made Pickwick so popular—the overflowing joy, vibrant humor, and warm-hearted satire—was enhanced here by a better structure, more interconnected events, and sharper character development. Everyone seemed to know the Nickleby family as well as they knew their own. Dotheboys, with all its absurdity and horror, became a common reference. Various groups like the Mantalinis, Kenwigses, and Crummleses each introduced their own little slice of reality, filled with truth and life, rich observations, quirky humor, and endless laughter and fun.[168] The brothers Cheeryble brought along all their charitable deeds. With Smike came the first of those moving portrayals that spread sympathy for the suffering caused by cruelty, ignorance, or neglect toward the young. And Newman Noggs represented a category of characters he seemed to enjoy most, and the more he wrote about them, the better he got at making them interesting: gentlemen at heart, no matter how awful their hats or how uncouth their speech; philosophers full of quiet strength, wearing shabby but respectable coats; humble angels of empathy and selflessness, lacking any shine or even looks, except for what a sensitive eye could perceive. "My friends," Sydney Smith wrote to Dickens, describing some ladies he knew who were eager to have him over for dinner, "have no objections to being featured in a story, but rather would be proud of the recognition; and Lady Charlotte, in particular, you may match with Newman Noggs." Lady Charlotte was no more real to Sydney than Newman Noggs; and everyone who was drawn to Dickens’s books gained just as much benefit as the clever and gifted man. Recently, some have argued that humanity isn’t portrayed in its most elevated or noble forms, and this claim may be worth discussing later; but what’s clear is that he has taught humanity in relatable and appealing ways to thousands upon thousands of readers, each of whom has likely made their own little world a bit better because of these lessons. From start to finish, they were never distant from the feelings or understandings of any social class; and there were many people at that time who couldn’t have defined imagination yet were gradually enriching their limited lives with its infinite rewards. [169]
One other kindliest product of humor in Nickleby, not to be passed over in even thus briefly recalling a few first impressions of it, was the good little miniature-painter Miss La Creevy, living by herself, overflowing with affections she has nobody to bestow on, but always cheerful by dint of industry and good-heartedness. When she is disappointed in the character of a woman she has been to see, she eases her mind by saying a very cutting thing at her expense in a soliloquy: and thereby illustrates one of the advantages of having lived alone so long, that she made always a confidante of herself; was as sarcastic as she could be, by herself, on people who offended her; pleased herself, and did no harm. Here was one of those touches, made afterwards familiar to the readers of Dickens by innumerable similar fancies, which added affection to their admiration for the writer, and enabled them to anticipate the feeling with which posterity would regard him as indeed the worthy companion of the Goldsmiths and Fieldings. There was a piece of writing, too, within not many pages of it, of which Leigh Hunt exclaimed on reading it that it surpassed the best things of the kind in Smollett that he was able to call to mind. This was the letter of Miss Squeers to Ralph Nickleby, giving him her version of the chastisement inflicted by Nicholas on the schoolmaster: "My pa requests me[170] to write to you, the doctors considering it doubtful whether he will ever recuvver the use of his legs which prevents his holding a pen. We are in a state of mind beyond everything, and my pa is one mask of brooses both blue and green likewise two forms are steepled in his Goar. . . . Me and my brother were then the victims of his feury since which we have suffered very much which leads us to the arrowing belief that we have received some injury in our insides, especially as no marks of violence are visible externally. I am screaming out loud all the time I write and so is my brother which takes off my attention rather and I hope will excuse mistakes". . . .
One other endearing aspect of humor in Nickleby, not to be overlooked even in this brief recap of a few first thoughts, was the kind-hearted miniature painter, Miss La Creevy, who lived alone, full of love she had no one to share it with, yet always cheerful due to her hard work and kindness. When she's let down by a woman she’s visited, she vents her frustration by saying something quite cutting about her in a little monologue, highlighting one of the perks of having lived alone for so long: she always had herself as a confidante; she could be as sarcastic as she wanted about people who annoyed her; she entertained herself without causing harm. This is one of those delightful touches, made familiar to readers of Dickens through countless similar ideas, that deepened their affection for the writer and helped them foresee the esteem with which future generations would view him as a fitting companion of Goldsmith and Fielding. There was also a piece of writing not far from this, which Leigh Hunt remarked upon reading that it outshone the best of Smollett that he could remember. This was Miss Squeers' letter to Ralph Nickleby, conveying her take on the punishment Nicholas dealt to the schoolmaster: "My pa requests me[170] to write to you, the doctors considering it doubtful whether he will ever recover the use of his legs which prevents him from holding a pen. We are in a state of mind beyond everything, and my pa is covered in bruises, both blue and green, plus two lumps are swelling on his forehead. . . . My brother and I have been the victims of his fury since then, which has caused us considerable distress, leading us to believe that we have suffered some internal injury, especially since no visible marks of violence are apparent on the outside. I am crying out loud the entire time I'm writing this, and so is my brother, which is quite distracting, and I hope it will excuse any mistakes." . . .
Thus rapidly may be indicated some elements that contributed to the sudden and astonishingly wide popularity of these books. I purposely reserve from my present notices of them, which are biographical rather than critical, any statement of the reasons for which I think them inferior in imagination and fancy to some of the later works; but there was continued and steady growth in them on the side of humor, observation, and character, while freshness and raciness of style continued to be an important help. There are faults of occasional exaggeration in the writing, but none that do not spring from animal spirits and good humor, or a pardonable excess, here and there, on the side of earnestness; and it has the rare virtue, whether gay or grave, of being always thoroughly intelligible and for the most part thoroughly natural, of suiting itself without effort to every change of mood, as quick, warm, and comprehensive as the sympathies it is taxed to express. The tone also is excellent. We are never[171] repelled by egotism or conceit, and misplaced ridicule never disgusts us. When good is going on, we are sure to see all the beauty of it; and when there is evil, we are in no danger of mistaking it for good. No one can paint more picturesquely by an apposite epithet, or illustrate more happily by a choice allusion. Whatever he knows or feels, too, is always at his fingers' ends, and is present through whatever he is doing. What Rebecca says to Ivanhoe of the black knight's mode of fighting would not be wholly inapplicable to Dickens's manner of writing: "There is more than mere strength, there seems as if the whole soul and spirit of the champion were given to every blow he deals." This, when a man deals his blows with a pen, is the sort of handling that freshens with new life the oldest facts, and breathes into thoughts the most familiar an emotion not felt before. There seemed to be not much to add to our knowledge of London until his books came upon us, but each in this respect outstripped the other in its marvels. In Nickleby the old city reappears under every aspect; and whether warmth and light are playing over what is good and cheerful in it, or the veil is uplifted from its darker scenes, it is at all times our privilege to see and feel it as it absolutely is. Its interior hidden life becomes familiar as its commonest outward forms, and we discover that we hardly knew anything of the places we supposed that we knew the best.
Some factors quickly show why these books became so unexpectedly popular. I'm intentionally leaving out my opinions about why I consider them less imaginative and creative than some newer works; however, it’s clear there was a steady improvement in humor, observation, and character development, while the fresh and lively writing style remained a significant plus. There are occasional instances of exaggeration in the writing, but these arise from enthusiasm and good humor, or occasionally from a forgivable excess of seriousness. The writing has the rare quality of being completely clear and for the most part very natural, adapting effortlessly to any shift in mood, as quick, warm, and encompassing as the emotions it aims to convey. The tone is also excellent. We’re never put off by self-importance or arrogance, and misplaced mockery never annoys us. When something good is happening, we can always appreciate its beauty; and when there’s wrongdoing, we don’t get it confused with goodness. No one can sketch more vividly with a well-chosen word or illustrate more effectively with a smart reference. Everything he knows or feels is always right at his fingertips, present in whatever he’s doing. Rebecca’s comment to Ivanhoe about the black knight’s fighting style could easily apply to Dickens's writing: "There’s more than just strength; it feels like the entire soul and spirit of the champion is behind every strike he makes." When someone writes with the same intensity, it revitalizes even the most familiar facts and injects new emotion into well-worn thoughts. It felt like we didn’t have much more to learn about London until his books arrived, with each one surpassing the last in its wonders. In Nickleby, the old city comes back to life from every angle; whether it’s basking in warmth and light or revealing its darker aspects, we get the chance to see and feel it exactly as it is. Its hidden inner life becomes as familiar as its most common outward appearances, and we realize that we hardly knew anything about the places we thought we knew best.
Of such notices as his letters give of his progress with Nickleby, which occupied him from February, 1838, to October, 1839, something may now be said. Soon after the agreement for it was signed, before the Christmas[172] of 1837 was over, he went down into Yorkshire with Mr. Hablot Browne to look up the Cheap Schools in that county to which public attention had been painfully drawn by a law-case in the previous year; which had before been notorious for cruelties committed in them, whereof he had heard as early as in his childish days;[21] and which he was bent upon destroying if he could. I soon heard the result of his journey; and the substance of that letter, returned to him for the purpose, is in his preface to the story written for the collected edition. He came back confirmed in his design, and in February set to work upon his first chapter. On his birthday he wrote to me, "I have begun! I wrote four slips last night, so you see the beginning is made. And what is more, I can go on: so I hope the book is in training at last." "The first chapter of Nicholas is done," he wrote two days later. "It took time, but I think answers the purpose as well as it could." Then, after a dozen days more, "I wrote twenty slips of Nicholas yesterday, left only four to do this morning (up at 8 o'clock too!), and have ordered my horse at one." I joined him as he expected, and we read together at dinner that day the first number of Nicholas Nickleby.
Of the updates his letters provide about his progress with Nickleby, which he worked on from February 1838 to October 1839, there’s something to discuss now. Shortly after signing the contract, and before Christmas of 1837 was over, he traveled to Yorkshire with Mr. Hablot Browne to investigate the Cheap Schools in that area. These schools had gained negative attention due to a legal case the previous year that highlighted the cruel practices within them, which he had heard about since childhood, and he was determined to put an end to them if he could. I quickly learned the outcome of his trip; the main points from that letter, which he sent back for this purpose, are included in his preface to the story in the collected edition. He returned more committed to his goal and in February started working on his first chapter. On his birthday, he wrote to me, "I have begun! I wrote four pages last night, so the beginning is done. And what's more, I can keep going: I hope the book is finally in progress." "The first chapter of Nicholas is finished," he wrote two days later. "It took a while, but I think it serves its purpose as well as it could." Then, after another twelve days, he said, "I wrote twenty pages of Nicholas yesterday, just four more to do this morning (up at 8 o'clock too!), and I've ordered my horse for one." I met up with him as planned, and that day at dinner, we read together the first issue of Nicholas Nickleby.
In the following number there was a difficulty which it was marvelous should not oftener have occurred to him in this form of publication. "I could not write a[173] line till three o'clock," he says, describing the close of that number, "and have yet five slips to finish, and don't know what to put in them, for I have reached the point I meant to leave off with." He found easy remedy for such a miscalculation at his outset, and it was nearly his last as well as first misadventure of the kind: his difficulty in Pickwick, as he once told me, having always been, not the running short, but the running over: not the whip, but the drag, that was wanted. Sufflaminandus erat, as Ben Jonson said of Shakspeare. And in future works, with such marvelous nicety could he do always what he had planned, strictly within the space available, that only another similar instance is remembered by me. The third number introduced the school; and "I remain dissatisfied until you have seen and read number three," was his way of announcing to me his own satisfaction with that first handling of Dotheboys Hall. Nor had it the least part in my admiration of his powers at this time that he never wrote without the printer at his heels; that, always in his later works two or three numbers in advance, he was never a single number in advance with this story; that the more urgent the call upon him the more readily he rose to it; and that his astonishing animal spirits never failed him. As late in the November month of 1838 as the 20th, he thus wrote to me: "I have just begun my second chapter; cannot go out to-night; must get on; think there will be a Nickleby at the end of this month now (I doubted it before); and want to make a start towards it if I possibly can." That was on Tuesday; and on Friday morning in the same week, explaining to me the failure of something[174] that had been promised the previous day, he tells me, "I was writing incessantly until it was time to dress; and have not yet got the subject of my last chapter, which must be finished to-night."
In the next issue, he faced a challenge that was surprising it hadn't happened more often in this type of publication. "I couldn't write a[173] line until three o'clock," he says, describing the end of that issue, "and I still have five slips to finish, but I don’t know what to put in them, since I've reached the point I planned to stop at." He found an easy fix for that miscalculation at the beginning, and it was nearly his last misadventure of that kind: his issue in Pickwick, as he once told me, was never running short, but running long: not needing more inspiration, but needing to restrain himself. Sufflaminandus erat, as Ben Jonson said of Shakespeare. In his future works, he managed to execute his plans with such amazing precision within the space allowed that I can only recall another similar instance. The third issue introduced the school, and "I remain dissatisfied until you have seen and read number three," was his way of expressing his satisfaction with that initial portrayal of Dotheboys Hall. It didn't lessen my admiration for his talent at the time that he always wrote with the printer right behind him; that, while in his later works he was two or three issues ahead, he was never ahead with this story; that the more pressing the demand on him, the more he rose to meet it; and that his incredible energy never let him down. As late as November 20th, 1838, he wrote to me: "I just started my second chapter; can’t go out tonight; I have to keep going; I think there will be a Nickleby at the end of this month now (I wasn't sure before); and I want to make a start on it if I can." That was on Tuesday; and by Friday morning of that same week, explaining to me why something[174] that had been promised the previous day hadn't happened, he told me, "I was writing non-stop until it was time to get ready; and I still haven't figured out the topic of my last chapter, which must be finished tonight."
But this was not all. Between that Tuesday and Friday an indecent assault had been committed on his book by a theatrical adapter named Stirling, who seized upon it without leave while yet only a third of it was written; hacked, cut, and garbled its dialogue to the shape of one or two farcical actors; invented for it a plot and an ending of his own, and produced it at the Adelphi; where the outraged author, hard pressed as he was with an unfinished number, had seen it in the interval between the two letters I have quoted. He would not have run such a risk in later years, but he threw off lightly at present even such offenses to his art; and though I was with him at a representation of his Oliver Twist the following month at the Surrey theatre, when in the middle of the first scene he laid himself down upon the floor in a corner of the box and never rose from it until the drop-scene fell, he had been able to sit through Nickleby and to see a kind of merit in some of the actors. Mr. Yates had a sufficiently humorous meaning in his wildest extravagance, and Mr. O. Smith could put into his queer angular oddities enough of a hard dry pathos, to conjure up shadows at least of Mantalini and Newman Noggs; of Ralph Nickleby there was indeed nothing visible save a wig, a spencer, and a pair of boots; but there was a quaint actor named Wilkinson who proved equal to the drollery though not to the fierce brutality of Squeers; and even Dickens, in the letter that amazed me by telling[175] me of his visit to the theatre, was able to praise "the skillful management and dressing of the boys, the capital manner and speech of Fanny Squeers, the dramatic representation of her card-party in Squeers's parlor, the careful making-up of all the people, and the exceedingly good tableaux formed from Browne's sketches. . . . Mrs. Keeley's first appearance beside the fire (see wollum), and all the rest of Smike, was excellent; bating sundry choice sentiments and rubbish regarding the little robins in the fields which have been put in the boy's mouth by Mr. Stirling the adapter." His toleration could hardly be extended to the robins, and their author he very properly punished by introducing and denouncing him at Mr. Crummles's farewell supper.
But that wasn't all. Between that Tuesday and Friday, an inappropriate attack had been made on his book by a theater adapter named Stirling, who took it without permission while only a third of it was complete; he chopped, cut, and twisted its dialogue to fit the style of one or two comedic actors; invented his own plot and ending, and staged it at the Adelphi. The outraged author, though busy with an unfinished work, had seen the performance in the break between the two letters I mentioned. He wouldn't have taken such a risk in later years, but at the moment, he brushed off even these offenses to his craft rather easily. Although I was with him at a showing of his Oliver Twist the following month at the Surrey Theatre, where he laid down on the floor in a corner of the box and didn't get up until the curtain fell, he had managed to sit through Nickleby and even found some merit in certain actors. Mr. Yates brought enough humor to his wildest antics, and Mr. O. Smith could infuse his quirky, angular oddities with enough of a dry pathos to evoke shadows of Mantalini and Newman Noggs. As for Ralph Nickleby, there was nothing visible but a wig, a spencer, and a pair of boots; yet there was a quirky actor named Wilkinson who mastered the comedy, though not the harsh brutality of Squeers. Even Dickens, in the letter that surprised me by detailing his theater visit, praised "the skillful management and dressing of the boys, the excellent portrayal and speech of Fanny Squeers, the dramatic scene of her card party in Squeers's parlor, the careful makeup of all the cast, and the very good tableaux based on Browne's sketches. . . . Mrs. Keeley's first appearance by the fire (see volume), and all the rest with Smike, was excellent; aside from some choice sentiments and nonsense about the little robins in the fields that Mr. Stirling, the adapter, had placed in the boy's mouth." His tolerance hardly extended to the robins, and he rightly punished their author by calling him out at Mr. Crummles's farewell dinner.
The story was well in hand at the next letter to be quoted, for I limit myself to those only with allusions that are characteristic or illustrative. "I must be alone in my glory to-day," he wrote, "and see what I can do. I perpetrated a great amount of work yesterday, and have every day indeed since Monday, but I must buckle-to again and endeavor to get the steam up. If this were to go on long, I should 'bust' the boiler. I think Mrs. Nickleby's love-scene will come out rather unique." The steam doubtless rose dangerously high when such happy inspiration came. It was but a few numbers earlier than this, while that eccentric lady was imparting her confidences to Miss Knag, that Sydney Smith confessed himself vanquished by a humor against which his own had long striven to hold out. "Nickleby is very good," he wrote to Sir George Phillips after the sixth number. "I stood out against Mr.[176] Dickens as long as I could, but he has conquered me."[22]
The story was well underway at the next letter to be quoted, as I only focus on those with references that are defining or illustrative. "I need to be alone in my glory today," he wrote, "and see what I can accomplish. I did a ton of work yesterday, and I have been working hard every day since Monday, but I need to push myself again and try to get the momentum going. If this keeps up for too long, I might 'blow' the boiler. I think Mrs. Nickleby's love scene will turn out pretty unique." The excitement must have been building dangerously high when such happy inspiration struck. Just a few issues before this, while that quirky lady was sharing her secrets with Miss Knag, Sydney Smith admitted he was defeated by a humor he had long tried to resist. "Nickleby is very good," he wrote to Sir George Phillips after the sixth issue. "I held out against Mr.[176] Dickens for as long as I could, but he has beaten me."[22]
The close of the story was written at Broadstairs, from which (he had taken a house "two doors from the Albion Hotel, where we had that merry night two years ago") he wrote to me on the 9th September, 1839, "I am hard at it, but these windings-up wind slowly, and I shall think I have done great things if I have entirely finished by the 20th. Chapman & Hall came down yesterday with Browne's sketches, and dined here. They imparted their intentions as to a Nicklebeian fête which will make you laugh heartily—so I reserve them till you come. It has been blowing great guns for the last three days, and last night (I wish you could have seen it!) there was such a sea! I staggered down to the pier, and, creeping under the lee of a large boat which was high and dry, watched it breaking for nearly an hour. Of course I came back wet through." On the afternoon of Wednesday, the 18th, he wrote again: "I shall not finish entirely before Friday, sending Hicks the last twenty pages of manuscript by the night-coach. I have had pretty stiff work, as you may suppose, and I have taken great pains. The discovery is made, Ralph is dead, the loves have come all right, Tim Linkinwater has proposed, and I have now only to break up Dotheboys and the book together. I am very anxious that you should see this conclusion before it leaves my hands, and I plainly see[177] therefore that I must come to town myself on Saturday if I would not endanger the appearance of the number. So I have written to Hicks to send proofs to your chambers as soon as he can that evening; and, if you don't object, I will dine with you any time after five, and we will devote the night to a careful reading. I have not written to Macready, for they have not yet sent me the title-page of dedication, which is merely 'To W. C. Macready, Esq., the following pages are inscribed, as a slight token of admiration and regard, by his friend the Author.' Meanwhile will you let him know that I have fixed the Nickleby dinner for Saturday, the 5th of October? Place, the Albion in Aldersgate Street. Time, six for half-past exactly. . . . I shall be more glad than I can tell you to see you again, and I look forward to Saturday, and the evenings that are to follow it, with most joyful anticipation. I have had a good notion for Barnaby, of which more anon."
The end of the story was written in Broadstairs, where he had rented a house "two doors down from the Albion Hotel, where we had that fun night two years ago." On September 9, 1839, he wrote to me, "I'm working hard, but wrapping things up takes time, and I’ll feel like I've accomplished something if I finish by the 20th. Chapman & Hall came down yesterday with Browne's sketches and had dinner here. They shared their plans for a Nicklebeian party that will make you laugh—a secret I'll keep until you arrive. It's been super windy for the last three days, and last night (I wish you could have seen it!) the sea was wild! I staggered down to the pier and, finding shelter under a large boat that was high and dry, I watched the waves crashing for nearly an hour. Of course, I came back completely soaked." On the afternoon of Wednesday, the 18th, he wrote again: "I won’t finish everything before Friday; I’ll send Hicks the last twenty pages of the manuscript by the night coach. I've been working hard, as you can imagine, and I've put in a lot of effort. The mystery is solved, Ralph is dead, the love stories have all turned out well, Tim Linkinwater has proposed, and now I just need to wrap up Dotheboys and the book together. I'm really eager for you to see this ending before it goes out, so I realize that I need to come to town myself on Saturday if I want to avoid delaying the release. I've asked Hicks to send proofs to your office as soon as he can that evening, and if you don't mind, I’d love to have dinner with you anytime after five, and we’ll spend the night carefully reading. I haven’t contacted Macready yet because they haven’t sent me the dedication title page, which simply says, 'To W. C. Macready, Esq., the following pages are inscribed, as a small token of admiration and regard, by his friend the Author.' In the meantime, could you let him know I’ve set the Nickleby dinner for Saturday, October 5th? Place: the Albion in Aldersgate Street. Time: six for half-past sharp. . . . I’m more excited than I can express to see you again, and I’m looking forward to Saturday and the upcoming evenings with great anticipation. I’ve come up with a great idea for Barnaby, but I’ll share more details later."
The shadow from the old quarter, we see, the unwritten Barnaby tale, intrudes itself still; though hardly, as of old, making other pleasanter anticipations less joyful. Such, indeed, at this time was his buoyancy of spirit that it cost him little, compared with the suffering it gave him at all subsequent similar times, to separate from the people who for twenty months had been a part of himself. The increased success they had achieved left no present room but for gladness and well-won pride; and so, to welcome them into the immortal family of the English novel, and open cheerily to their author "fresh woods and pastures new," we had the dinner[178] celebration. But there is small need now to speak of what has left, to one of the few survivors, only the sadness of remembering that all who made the happiness of it are passed away. There was Talfourd, facile and fluent of kindliest speech, with whom we were in constant and cordial intercourse, and to whom, grateful for his copyright exertions in the House of Commons, he had dedicated Pickwick; there was Maclise, dear and familiar friend to us both, whose lately-painted portrait of Dickens hung in the room;[23] and there was the painter of the Rent-day, who made a speech as good as his pictures, rich in color and quaint with homely allusion, all about the reality of Dickens's genius, and how there had been nothing like him issuing his novels part by part since Richardson issued his novels volume by volume, and how in both cases people talked about the characters as if they were next-door neighbors or friends; and as many letters were written to the author of Nickleby to implore him not to kill poor Smike, as had been sent by young ladies to the author of[179] Clarissa to "save Lovelace's soul alive." These and others are gone. Of those who survive, only three arise to my memory,—Macready, who spoke his sense of the honor done him by the dedication in English as good as his delivery of it, Mr. Edward Chapman, and Mr. Thomas Beard.
The shadow from the old quarter still looms over us, the yet-to-be-written Barnaby story intrudes; though not as much as before, it doesn't dampen our other happier expectations. Indeed, at this moment, his spirit was so buoyant that it hardly cost him anything, compared to the pain it would bring him at later times, to part ways with the people who had been a part of him for twenty months. Their newfound success brought nothing but joy and well-deserved pride; thus, to welcome them into the timeless circle of the English novel and cheerfully open up "fresh woods and pastures new" to their author, we held a dinner celebration. However, there’s little point in reminiscing about what’s gone, as for one of the few survivors, it only brings the sadness of remembering that all those who made it joyful have passed away. There was Talfourd, who was easy and warm in conversation, with whom we shared constant and friendly exchanges, and to whom he had dedicated Pickwick out of gratitude for his copyright efforts in the House of Commons; there was Maclise, a dear and familiar friend to both of us, whose recently painted portrait of Dickens hung in the room; and there was the artist of the Rent-day, who gave a speech as charming as his paintings, rich in color and filled with everyday references about the reality of Dickens's genius, highlighting how nothing else like it had emerged since Richardson released his novels volume by volume. Both cases saw people discussing the characters as though they were neighbors or friends; just as many letters were sent to the author of Nickleby pleading not to kill poor Smike, similar to those sent by young ladies to the author of Clarissa to "save Lovelace's soul." These and others are gone. Of the survivors, only three come to mind—Macready, who expressed his gratitude for the honor of the dedication in English just as good as his delivery, Mr. Edward Chapman, and Mr. Thomas Beard.
CHAPTER X.
DURING AND AFTER NICKLEBY.
1838-1839.
The name of his old gallery-companion may carry me back from the days to which the close of Nickleby had led me to those when it was only beginning. "This snow will take away the cold weather," he had written, in that birthday letter of 1838 already quoted, "and then for Twickenham." Here a cottage was taken, nearly all the summer was passed, and a familiar face there was Mr. Beard's. There, with Talfourd and with Thackeray and Jerrold, we had many friendly days, too; and the social charm of Maclise was seldom wanting. Nor was there anything that exercised a greater fascination over Dickens than the grand enjoyment of idleness, the ready self-abandonment to the luxury of laziness, which we both so laughed at in Maclise, under whose easy swing of indifference, always the most[181] amusing at the most aggravating events and times, we knew that there was artist-work as eager, energy as unwearying, and observation almost as penetrating as Dickens's own. A greater enjoyment than the fellowship of Maclise at this period it would indeed be difficult to imagine. Dickens hardly saw more than he did, while yet he seemed to be seeing nothing; and the small esteem in which this rare faculty was held by himself, a quaint oddity that gave to shrewdness itself in him an air of Irish simplicity, his unquestionable turn for literature, and a varied knowledge of it not always connected with such intense love and such unwearied practice of one special and absorbing art, combined to render him attractive far beyond the common. His fine genius and his handsome person, of neither of which at any time he seemed himself to be in the slightest degree conscious, completed the charm. Edwin Landseer, all the world's favorite, and the excellent Stanfield, came a few months later, in the Devonshire-Terrace days; but another painter-friend was George Cattermole, who had then enough and to spare of fun as well as fancy to supply ordinary artists and humorists by the dozen, and wanted only a little more ballast and steadiness to have had all that could give attraction to good-fellowship. A friend now especially welcome, too, was the novelist Mr. Ainsworth, who shared with us incessantly for the three following years in the companionship which began at his house; with whom we visited, during two of those years, friends of art and letters in his native Manchester, from among whom Dickens brought away his Brothers Cheeryble, and to whose sympathy in tastes and pursuits,[182] accomplishments in literature, open-hearted generous ways, and cordial hospitality, many of the pleasures of later years were due. Frederick Dickens, to whom soon after this a treasury clerkship was handsomely given, on Dickens's application, by Mr. Stanley of Alderley, known in and before those Manchester days, was for the present again living with his father, but passed much time in his brother's home; and another familiar face was that of Mr. Thomas Mitton, who had known him when himself a law-clerk in Lincoln's Inn, through whom there was introduction of the relatives of a friend and partner, Mr. Smithson, the gentleman connected with Yorkshire mentioned in his preface to Nickleby, who became very intimate in his house. These, his father and mother and their two younger sons, with members of his wife's family, and his married sisters and their husbands, Mr. and Mrs. Burnett and Mr. and Mrs. Austin, are figures that all associate themselves prominently with the days of Doughty Street and the cottages of Twickenham and Petersham as remembered by me in the summers of 1838 and 1839.
The name of his old gallery companion takes me back from the time that the end of Nickleby led me to when it was just starting. "This snow will take away the cold weather," he wrote in that birthday letter from 1838 that I've referenced already, "and then for Twickenham." Here, a cottage was rented, and we spent nearly the whole summer there, where Mr. Beard was a familiar face. There, alongside Talfourd, Thackeray, and Jerrold, we shared many enjoyable days, and Maclise's social charm was always present. Nothing fascinated Dickens more than the genuine pleasure of idleness and the willingness to indulge in the luxury of laziness, which we both found amusing in Maclise. Under his nonchalant indifference, the most amusing moments could occur during the most frustrating times, but we knew he had the eagerness of an artist, unwavering energy, and an observational skill almost as sharp as Dickens's own. It’s hard to imagine a greater pleasure than the camaraderie with Maclise during this time. Dickens barely observed more than he did, yet it seemed like he noticed nothing at all; the low regard he held for his unusual ability, a quirky quality that gave even his sharpness an air of Irish simplicity, along with his undeniable literary talent and a broad understanding of literature—none of which was always tied to a deep love for or constant practice in one specific and consuming art—made him appealing far beyond the ordinary. His remarkable talent and good looks, neither of which he seemed even slightly aware of, added to his charm. A few months later, during the Devonshire-Terrace days, our favorite Edwin Landseer and the excellent Stanfield joined us; however, another painter-friend was George Cattermole, who at the time had plenty of fun and creativity to share with everyday artists and humorists, needing just a bit more stability to have everything that could attract good friendship. Also especially welcomed was the novelist Mr. Ainsworth, who spent the next three years constantly with us, beginning at his home; during those two years, we visited art and literary friends in his hometown of Manchester, from which Dickens took away his Brothers Cheeryble. Thanks to their shared tastes and interests, literary talents, and generous and warm hospitality, many of the joys of later years were owed to them. Frederick Dickens, who was soon after appointed to a treasury clerkship thanks to Dickens's request to Mr. Stanley of Alderley, known since and before those Manchester days, was once again living with his father but spent a lot of time at his brother's place; another familiar face was Mr. Thomas Mitton, who had known him back when he was a law clerk at Lincoln's Inn. Through him, we were introduced to the relatives of a friend and partner, Mr. Smithson, the gentleman from Yorkshire mentioned in his preface to Nickleby, who became very close with his family. These include his father, mother, and their two younger sons, along with members of his wife's family and his married sisters and their husbands, Mr. and Mrs. Burnett and Mr. and Mrs. Austin, who are all figures closely associated with the days of Doughty Street and the cottages of Twickenham and Petersham as I recall them during the summers of 1838 and 1839.
In the former of these years the sports were necessarily quieter[24] than at Petersham, where extensive garden-grounds[183] admitted of much athletic competition, from the more difficult forms of which I in general modestly retired, but where Dickens for the most part held his own against even such accomplished athletes as Maclise and Mr. Beard. Bar-leaping, bowling, and quoits were among the games carried on with the greatest ardor; and in sustained energy, what is called keeping it up, Dickens certainly distanced every competitor. Even the lighter recreations of battledoor and bagatelle were pursued with relentless activity; and at such amusements as the Petersham races, in those days rather celebrated, and which he visited daily while they lasted, he worked much harder himself than the running horses did.
In those earlier years, the sports were definitely quieter[24] than at Petersham, where the large gardens[183] allowed for plenty of athletic competition. Generally, I modestly stepped back from the more challenging events, but Dickens mostly held his own against even skilled athletes like Maclise and Mr. Beard. Bar-leaping, bowling, and quoits were among the games played with great enthusiasm; in terms of stamina, or what is called keeping it up, Dickens definitely outperformed every competitor. Even the lighter games of battledore and bagatelle were pursued with relentless energy. At events like the Petersham races, which were quite popular back then, he put in far more effort than the racing horses did, visiting daily while they were on.
What else his letters of these years enable me to recall, that could possess any interest now, may be told in a dozen sentences. He wrote a farce by way of helping the Covent Garden manager which the actors could not agree about, and which he turned afterwards into a story called The Lamplighter. He entered his name among the students at the inn of the Middle Temple, though he did not eat dinners there until many years later. We made together a circuit of nearly all the London prisons, and, in coming to the[184] prisoners under remand while going over Newgate, accompanied by Macready and Mr. Hablot Browne,[25] were startled by a sudden tragic cry of "My God! there's Wainewright!" In the shabby-genteel creature, with sandy disordered hair and dirty moustache, who had turned quickly round with a defiant stare at our entrance, looking at once mean and fierce, and quite capable of the cowardly murders he had committed, Macready had been horrified to recognize a man familiarly known to him in former years, and at whose table he had dined. Between the completion of Oliver and its publication, Dickens went to see something of North Wales; and, joining him at Liverpool, I returned with him.[26] Soon after his arrival he had pleasant communication with Lockhart, dining with him at Cruikshank's a little later; and this was the prelude to a Quarterly notice of Oliver by Mr. Ford, written at the instance of Lockhart, but without the raciness he would have put into it, in which amende was made for previous less favorable remarks in that review. Dickens had not, however, waited for this to express publicly his hearty sympathy with Lockhart's handling of some passages in his admirable Life of Scott that had drawn[185] down upon him the wrath of the Ballantynes. This he did in the Examiner; where also I find him noticing a book by Thomas Hood: "rather poor, but I have not said so, because Hood is too, and ill besides." In the course of the year he was taken into Devonshire to select a home for his father, on the removal of the latter (who had long given up his reporting duties) from his London residence; and this he found in a cottage at Alphington, near Exeter, where he placed the elder Dickens with his wife and their youngest son. The same year closed Macready's Covent Garden management, and at the dinner to the retiring manager, when the Duke of Cambridge took the chair, Dickens spoke with that wonderful instinct of knowing what to abstain from saying, as well as what to say, which made his after-dinner speeches quite unique. Nor should mention be omitted of the Shakspeare Society, now diligently attended, of which Procter, Talfourd, Macready, Thackeray, Henry Davison, Blanchard, Charles Knight, John Bell, Douglas Jerrold, Maclise, Stanfield, George Cattermole, the good Tom Landseer, Frank Stone, and other old friends were members, and where, out of much enjoyment and many disputings,[27] there arose,[186] from Dickens and all of us, plenty of after-dinner oratory. The closing months of this year of 1839 had special interest for him. At the end of October another daughter was born to him, who bears the name of that dear friend of his and mine, Macready, whom he asked to be her godfather; and before the close of the year he had moved out of Doughty Street into Devonshire Terrace, a handsome house with a garden of considerable size, shut out from the New Road by a high brick wall facing the York Gate into Regent's Park. These various matters, and his attempts at the Barnaby novel on the conclusion of Nickleby, are the subject of his letters between October and December.
What else his letters from these years allow me to remember, which could still be interesting now, can be summarized in a few sentences. He wrote a farce to help the Covent Garden manager that the actors couldn’t agree on, which he later turned into a story called The Lamplighter. He signed up as a student at the Middle Temple, though he didn’t have meals there until many years later. We toured nearly all the London prisons together, and while visiting the prisoners under remand at Newgate, accompanied by Macready and Mr. Hablot Browne, we were shocked by a sudden tragic shout of "My God! there’s Wainewright!" In the scruffy, genteel figure, with messy sandy hair and a dirty mustache, who turned quickly to glare at us as we entered, looking both petty and fierce, and entirely capable of the cowardly murders he had committed, Macready was horrified to recognize a man he had known well in earlier years, at whose table he had dined. Between finishing Oliver and its publication, Dickens took a trip to see some of North Wales; I met him in Liverpool and traveled back with him. Soon after arriving, he had a pleasant conversation with Lockhart and dined with him at Cruikshank’s a little later; this led to a Quarterly review of Oliver by Mr. Ford, written at Lockhart’s request, though it lacked the liveliness he would have added, which made up for previous less favorable comments in that review. However, Dickens hadn’t waited for this to publicly express his strong support for Lockhart’s treatment of some passages in his excellent Life of Scott, which had drawn the ire of the Ballantynes. He did this in the Examiner; where he also mentioned a book by Thomas Hood: "rather weak, but I haven’t said so, because Hood is too, and poorly besides." During the year, he was taken to Devonshire to find a home for his father after the latter (who had long stopped his reporting duties) moved from his London home; he found a cottage in Alphington, near Exeter, where he settled the elder Dickens with his wife and their youngest son. That same year marked the end of Macready's management at Covent Garden, and at the farewell dinner for the retiring manager, presided over by the Duke of Cambridge, Dickens spoke with that remarkable sense of knowing what to say and what to avoid saying, which made his after-dinner speeches truly unique. It's also worth mentioning the Shakespeare Society, which he attended regularly, where Procter, Talfourd, Macready, Thackeray, Henry Davison, Blanchard, Charles Knight, John Bell, Douglas Jerrold, Maclise, Stanfield, George Cattermole, the good Tom Landseer, Frank Stone, and other old friends were members, and where, amid much enjoyment and many debates, there was plenty of after-dinner oratory from Dickens and all of us. The final months of 1839 held special significance for him. At the end of October, another daughter was born to him, named after his dear friend Macready, whom he asked to be her godfather; and before the year ended, he moved from Doughty Street to Devonshire Terrace, a beautiful house with a large garden, shielded from the New Road by a tall brick wall facing the York Gate into Regent's Park. These various matters, along with his efforts on the Barnaby novel after finishing Nickleby, are the focus of his letters from October to December.
"Thank God, all goes famously. I have worked at Barnaby all day, and moreover seen a beautiful (and reasonable) house in Kent Terrace, where Macready once lived, but larger than his." Again (this having gone off): "Barnaby has suffered so much from the house-hunting, that I mustn't chop to-day." Then (for the matter of the Middle Temple), "I return the form. It's the right temple, I take for granted. Barnaby moves, not at race-horse speed, but yet as fast (I think) as under these unsettled circumstances could possibly be expected." Or again: "All well. Barnaby has reached his tenth page. I have just turned lazy, and have passed into Christabel, and thence to Wallenstein." At last the choice was made. "A house of great promise (and great premium), 'undeniable'[187] situation, and excessive splendor, is in view. Mitton is in treaty, and I am in ecstatic restlessness. Kate wants to know whether you have any books to send her, so please to shoot here any literary rubbish on hand." To these I will only add a couple of extracts from his letters while in Exeter arranging his father's and mother's new home. They are very humorous; and the vividness with which everything, once seen, was photographed in his mind and memory, is pleasantly shown in them.
"Thank God, everything is going great. I’ve been working on Barnaby all day, and I also found a beautiful (and affordable) house in Kent Terrace, which is bigger than the one Macready used to live in." Then, regarding the house-hunting, "Barnaby has been through so much because of it that I shouldn’t chop today." Then (about the Middle Temple), "I’m sending back the form. I assume it's the right temple. Barnaby is moving, not at race-horse speed, but still as fast as can be expected under these uncertain circumstances." Or again: "All good. Barnaby has reached his tenth page. I've gotten a bit lazy and have switched to Christabel, and then to Wallenstein." Finally, the choice was made. "A house with great potential (and a hefty price), in an 'unquestionable'[187] location, and excessive splendor, is in sight. Mitton is in negotiations, and I’m feeling a mix of excitement and restlessness. Kate wants to know if you have any books to send her, so please send over any literary junk you have." To this, I’ll just add a couple of excerpts from his letters while in Exeter arranging a new home for his parents. They’re really funny; and the way he vividly captured everything he saw in his mind and memory is nicely reflected in them.
"I took a little house for them this morning" (5th March, 1839: from the New London Inn), "and if they are not pleased with it I shall be grievously disappointed. Exactly a mile beyond the city on the Plymouth road there are two white cottages: one is theirs and the other belongs to their landlady. I almost forget the number of rooms, but there is an excellent parlor with two other rooms on the ground floor, there is really a beautiful little room over the parlor which I am furnishing as a drawing-room, and there is a splendid garden. The paint and paper throughout is new and fresh and cheerful-looking, the place is clean beyond all description, and the neighborhood I suppose the most beautiful in this most beautiful of English counties. Of the landlady, a Devonshire widow with whom I had the honor of taking lunch to-day, I must make most especial mention. She is a fat, infirm, splendidly-fresh-faced country dame, rising sixty and recovering from an attack 'on the nerves'—I thought they never went off the stones, but I find they try country air with the best of us. In the event of my mother's being ill at any time, I really think the[188] vicinity of this good dame, the very picture of respectability and good humor, will be the greatest possible comfort. Her furniture and domestic arrangements are a capital picture, but that I reserve till I see you, when I anticipate a hearty laugh. She bears the highest character with the bankers and the clergyman (who formerly lived in my cottage himself), and is a kind-hearted worthy capital specimen of the sort of life, or I have no eye for the real and no idea of finding it out.
"I rented a little house for them this morning" (5th March, 1839: from the New London Inn), "and if they don’t like it, I’ll be really disappointed. Exactly a mile beyond the city on the Plymouth road, there are two white cottages: one is theirs, and the other belongs to their landlady. I almost forget how many rooms there are, but there’s a great parlor with two other rooms on the ground floor, and there’s actually a lovely little room over the parlor that I’m turning into a drawing-room, plus a wonderful garden. The paint and wallpaper throughout are new and fresh and cheerful-looking, the place is incredibly clean, and the neighborhood is probably the most beautiful in this stunning part of England. I must especially mention the landlady, a Devonshire widow with whom I had the pleasure of having lunch today. She’s a plump, frail, wonderfully fresh-faced country lady, nearing sixty and recovering from a 'nervous' condition—I thought those never went away, but I see they try country air like everyone else. If my mom happens to get sick at any time, I really think having this good lady nearby, the very picture of respectability and good humor, will be the greatest comfort. Her furniture and home setup are a fantastic sight, but I’ll save that until I see you, when I expect we’ll have a good laugh. She has the highest reputation with the bankers and the clergyman (who used to live in my cottage himself) and is a kind-hearted, top-notch example of that kind of life, or I have no sense of what’s real and no idea how to find it."
"This good lady's brother and his wife live in the next nearest cottage, and the brother transacts the good lady's business, the nerves not admitting of her transacting it herself, although they leave her in her debilitated state something sharper than the finest lancet. Now, the brother having coughed all night till he coughed himself into such a perspiration that you might have 'wringed his hair,' according to the asseveration of eye-witnesses, his wife was sent for to negotiate with me; and if you could have seen me sitting in the kitchen with the two old women, endeavoring to make them comprehend that I had no evil intentions or covert designs, and that I had come down all that way to take some cottage and had happened to walk down that road and see that particular one, you would never have forgotten it. Then, to see the servant-girl run backwards and forwards to the sick man, and when the sick man had signed one agreement which I drew up and the old woman instantly put away in a disused tea-caddy, to see the trouble and the number of messages it took before the sick man could be brought to sign another (a duplicate) that we might have one[189] apiece, was one of the richest scraps of genuine drollery I ever saw in all my days. How, when the business was over, we became conversational; how I was facetious, and at the same time virtuous and domestic; how I drank toasts in the beer, and stated on interrogatory that I was a married man and the father of two blessed infants; how the ladies marveled thereat; how one of the ladies, having been in London, inquired where I lived, and, being told, remembered that Doughty Street and the Foundling Hospital were in the Old Kent Road, which I didn't contradict,—all this and a great deal more must make us laugh when I return, as it makes me laugh now to think of. Of my subsequent visit to the upholsterer recommended by the landlady; of the absence of the upholsterer's wife, and the timidity of the upholsterer fearful of acting in her absence; of my sitting behind a high desk in a little dark shop, calling over the articles in requisition and checking off the prices as the upholsterer exhibited the goods and called them out; of my coming over the upholsterer's daughter with many virtuous endearments, to propitiate the establishment and reduce the bill; of these matters I say nothing, either, for the same reason as that just mentioned. The discovery of the cottage I seriously regard as a blessing (not to speak it profanely) upon our efforts in this cause. I had heard nothing from the bank, and walked straight there, by some strange impulse, directly after breakfast. I am sure they may be happy there; for if I were older, and my course of activity were run, I am sure I could, with God's blessing, for many and many a year." . . .
"This lady's brother and his wife live in the nearby cottage, and the brother handles the lady's business because her nerves prevent her from managing it herself, even though they leave her in her weakened state feeling sharper than the finest surgical instrument. Now, the brother had been coughing all night until he was so sweaty that you could have 'wrung out his hair,' according to witnesses, so his wife was sent to talk to me. If you could have seen me sitting in the kitchen with the two older women, trying to make them understand that I had no bad intentions or hidden agendas, and that I had come all that way to find a cottage and had just happened to walk down that road and notice that specific one, you wouldn't forget it. Then, seeing the maid running back and forth to the sick man, and after the sick man signed one agreement I prepared—which the old woman immediately put away in a forgotten tea caddy—it took so much effort and so many messages before the sick man could be brought to sign another (a duplicate) so we could each have one, was one of the most genuinely hilarious things I've ever witnessed. After the business was settled, we became chatty; I made jokes while being both proper and homey; I toasted with the beer and stated, when asked, that I was a married man and the father of two lovely children; the ladies were amazed by that; one lady, who had been to London, asked where I lived, and when I told her, she remembered that Doughty Street and the Foundling Hospital were on the Old Kent Road, which I didn’t dispute—all of this and so much more makes me laugh when I think of it now. I’ll say nothing about my later visit to the upholsterer recommended by the landlady; the absence of the upholsterer’s wife made him nervous about proceeding without her; me sitting behind a high desk in a small dark shop, listing the items I needed while checking the prices as the upholsterer showed me the goods and named them; or my attempts to charm the upholsterer’s daughter with many sweet words to win favor and lower the bill—I won’t mention these either for the same reason above. I truly see the discovery of the cottage as a big blessing (not to sound irreverent) on our efforts in this pursuit. I hadn’t heard anything from the bank and, for some strange reason, walked straight there right after breakfast. I’m sure they can be happy there; if I were older and my active days were behind me, I’m sure I could, with God’s blessing, be happy there for many years to come."
"The theatre is open here, and Charles Kean is to-night[190] playing for his last night. If it had been the 'rig'lar' drama I should have gone, but I was afraid Sir Giles Overreach might upset me, so I stayed away. My quarters are excellent, and the head-waiter is such a waiter! Knowles (not Sheridan Knowles, but Knowles of the Cheetham Hill Road[28]) is an ass to him. This sounds bold, but truth is stranger than fiction. By-the-by, not the least comical thing that has occurred was the visit of the upholsterer (with some further calculations) since I began this letter. I think they took me here at the New London for the Wonderful Being I am; they were amazingly sedulous; and no doubt they looked for my being visited by the nobility and gentry of the neighborhood. My first and only visitor came to-night: a ruddy-faced man in faded black, with extracts from a feather-bed all over him; an extraordinary and quite miraculously dirty face; a thick stick; and the personal appearance altogether of an amiable bailiff in a green old age. I have not seen the proper waiter since, and more than suspect I shall not recover this blow. He was announced (by the waiter) as 'a person.' I expect my bill every minute. . . .
"The theater is open here, and Charles Kean is performing tonight for his final show. If it had been a regular drama, I would have gone, but I was worried Sir Giles Overreach might unsettle me, so I stayed away. My accommodations are excellent, and the head waiter is really something! Knowles (not Sheridan Knowles, but Knowles from Cheetham Hill Road) is a complete fool to him. This may sound bold, but truth is stranger than fiction. By the way, one of the funniest things that happened was the upholsterer visiting (with some additional calculations) since I started this letter. I think they took me here at the New London for the Wonderful Being I am; they were incredibly eager, and I'm sure they expected me to be visited by the local nobility and gentry. My first and only visitor came tonight: a ruddy-faced man in worn black, looking like he just emerged from a feather bed; an extraordinarily dirty face; a sturdy stick; and overall, the look of a friendly bailiff in old age. I haven’t seen the proper waiter since, and I strongly suspect I won’t recover from this shock. He was introduced (by the waiter) as 'a person.' I expect my bill any minute..."
"The waiter is laughing outside the door with another waiter—this is the latest intelligence of my condition."
"The waiter is laughing outside the door with another waiter—this is the latest update on how I'm doing."
CHAPTER XI.
NEW LITERARY PROJECT.
1839.
The time was now come for him seriously to busy himself with a successor to Pickwick and Nickleby, which he had not, however, waited thus long before turning over thoroughly in his mind. Nickleby's success had so far outgone even the expectation raised by Pickwick's, that, without some handsome practical admission of this fact at the close, its publishers could hardly hope to retain him. This had been frequently discussed by us, and was well understood. But, apart from the question of his resuming with them at all, he had persuaded himself it might be unsafe to resume in the old way, believing the public likely to tire of the same twenty numbers over again. There was also another and more sufficient reason for change which[192] naturally had great weight with him, and this was the hope that, by invention of a new mode as well as kind of serial publication, he might be able for a time to discontinue the writing of a long story with all its strain on his fancy, in any case to shorten and vary the length of the stories written by himself, and perhaps ultimately to retain all the profits of a continuous publication without necessarily himself contributing every line that was to be written for it. These considerations had been discussed still more anxiously; and for several months some such project had been taking form in his thoughts.
The time had come for him to seriously focus on finding a successor to Pickwick and Nickleby, which he hadn't, however, delayed for long before fully considering. The success of Nickleby had exceeded even the expectations set by Pickwick, so without a significant acknowledgment of this fact at the end, its publishers could hardly expect to keep him. This had been talked about frequently between us and was well understood. But aside from whether he would continue working with them at all, he had convinced himself it might be risky to go back to the old approach, believing the audience might get bored with the same twenty installments again. There was also another, more compelling reason for change, which naturally mattered a lot to him, and that was the hope that, by inventing a new method as well as type of serial publication, he might be able to step back from writing a long story, easing the strain on his creativity. In any case, he aimed to shorten and vary the length of the stories he wrote and maybe, in the end, keep all the profits from a continuous publication without having to write every single line for it himself. These thoughts had been discussed even more seriously, and for several months, a project like this had been taking shape in his mind.
While he was at Petersham (July, 1839) he thus wrote to me: "I have been thinking that subject over. Indeed, I have been doing so to the great stoppage of Nickleby and the great worrying and fidgeting of myself. I have been thinking that if Chapman & Hall were to admit you into their confidence with respect to what they mean to do at the conclusion of Nickleby, without admitting me, it would help us very much. You know that I am well disposed towards them, and that if they do something handsome, even handsomer perhaps than they dreamt of doing, they will find it their interest, and will find me tractable. You know also that I have had straightforward offers from responsible men to publish anything for me at a percentage on the profits and take all the risk; but that I am unwilling to leave them, and have declared to you that if they behave with liberality to me I will not on any consideration, although to a certain extent I certainly and surely must gain by it. Knowing all this, I feel sure that if you were to put before them the glories of[193] our new project, and, reminding them that when Barnaby is published I am clear of all engagements, were to tell them that if they wish to secure me and perpetuate our connection now is the time for them to step gallantly forward and make such proposals as will produce that result,—I feel quite sure that if this should be done by you, as you only can do it, the result will be of the most vital importance to me and mine, and that a very great deal may be effected, thus, to recompense your friend for very small profits and very large work as yet. I shall see you, please God, on Tuesday night; and if they wait upon you on Wednesday, I shall remain in town until that evening."
While he was at Petersham (July, 1839), he wrote to me: "I've been thinking about that topic a lot. In fact, it's really slowed down my work on Nickleby and made me quite anxious. I’ve been considering that if Chapman & Hall were to let you in on what they plan to do at the end of Nickleby without including me, it would really help us a lot. You know I have a positive attitude toward them, and if they do something generous—maybe even more generous than they’ve considered—I think they’ll find it to their benefit, and I’ll be easy to work with. You also know that I’ve received straightforward offers from trustworthy people to publish anything for me on a profit-sharing basis and take all the risks, but I don’t want to leave them. I’ve told you that if they treat me well, I won’t abandon them, even though I would certainly gain something from it. Knowing all this, I'm convinced that if you present them the potential of our new project, and remind them that once Barnaby is published, I’ll be free from all commitments, and tell them that if they want to keep me on and strengthen our partnership, now is the time for them to make bold proposals to achieve that—I truly believe that if you do this, as only you can, it will be incredibly important for me and my future, and a lot could be done to reward your friend for the small profits and significant work so far. I hope to see you on Tuesday night; and if they meet with you on Wednesday, I’ll stay in town until that evening."
They came; and the tenor of the interview was so favorable that I wished him to put in writing what from time to time had been discussed in connection with the new project. This led to the very interesting letter I shall now quote, written also in the same month from Petersham. I did not remember, until I lately read it, that the notion of a possible visit to America had been in his thoughts so early.
They arrived, and the tone of the meeting was so positive that I asked him to put in writing what had been discussed occasionally regarding the new project. This resulted in the very interesting letter that I’m about to quote, which was also written in the same month from Petersham. I didn’t recall, until I read it recently, that the idea of a potential visit to America had crossed his mind so early on.
"I should be willing to commence on the thirty-first of March, 1840, a new publication, consisting entirely of original matter, of which one number, price threepence, should be published every week, and of which a certain amount of numbers should form a volume, to be published at regular intervals. The best general idea of the plan of the work might be given, perhaps, by reference to the Spectator, the Tatler, and Goldsmith's Bee; but it would be far more popular both in the subjects of which it treats and its mode of treating them.[194]
"I plan to launch a new publication on March 31, 1840, featuring entirely original content. Each issue will cost threepence and be released weekly, with a specific number of issues collected into a volume published at regular intervals. To give you a general idea of the concept, you can think of it like the Spectator, the Tatler, and Goldsmith's Bee; however, it will be more popular in both the topics it covers and how it presents them.[194]
"I should propose to start, as the Spectator does, with some pleasant fiction relative to the origin of the publication; to introduce a little club or knot of characters and to carry their personal histories and proceedings through the work; to introduce fresh characters constantly; to reintroduce Mr. Pickwick and Sam Weller, the latter of whom might furnish an occasional communication with great effect; to write amusing essays on the various foibles of the day as they arise; to take advantage of all passing events; and to vary the form of the papers by throwing them into sketches, essays, tales, adventures, letters from imaginary correspondents, and so forth, so as to diversify the contents as much as possible.
"I think I should start, like the Spectator does, with some enjoyable storytelling about how the publication began; to create a little group of characters and weave their personal stories and activities throughout the work; to constantly introduce new characters; to bring back Mr. Pickwick and Sam Weller, the latter of whom could provide occasional updates with great impact; to write entertaining essays about the various quirks of the time as they arise; to take advantage of current events; and to change up the format of the pieces by turning them into sketches, essays, stories, adventures, letters from fictional correspondents, and so on, to keep the content as varied as possible."
"In addition to this general description of the contents, I may add that under particular heads I should strive to establish certain features in the work, which should be so many veins of interest and amusement running through the whole. Thus the Chapters on Chambers, which I have long thought and spoken of, might be very well incorporated with it; and a series of papers has occurred to me containing stories and descriptions of London as it was many years ago, as it is now, and as it will be many years hence, to which I would give some such title as The Relaxations of Gog and Magog, dividing them into portions like the Arabian Nights, and supposing Gog and Magog to entertain each other with such narrations in Guildhall all night long, and to break off every morning at daylight. An almost inexhaustible field of fun, raillery, and interest would be laid open by pursuing this idea.
"In addition to this general overview of the contents, I should mention that under specific topics, I aim to establish certain features in the work that will serve as threads of interest and entertainment throughout. For example, the chapters on Chambers, which I've thought about and talked about for a long time, could fit very well into this. I've also come up with a series of articles that contain stories and descriptions of London as it was many years ago, as it is now, and as it will be many years in the future, to which I would give a title like The Relaxations of Gog and Magog. I envision dividing them into sections like the Arabian Nights, imagining Gog and Magog entertaining each other with these tales in Guildhall all night, stopping only at dawn. This idea could open up a nearly endless source of fun, humor, and interest."
"I would also commence, and continue from time to[195] time, a series of satirical papers purporting to be translated from some Savage Chronicles, and to describe the administration of justice in some country that never existed, and record the proceedings of its wise men. The object of this series (which if I can compare it with anything would be something between Gulliver's Travels and the Citizen of the World) would be to keep a special lookout upon the magistrates in town and country, and never to leave those worthies alone.
I would also start, and periodically continue, a series of satirical articles pretending to be translations from some Savage Chronicles, aiming to describe the justice system in a country that never existed, and document the actions of its wise leaders. The goal of this series (which I would compare to a mix of Gulliver's Travels and The Citizen of the World) would be to keep a close watch on the local magistrates, both in town and country, never giving those worthy individuals a moment's peace.
"The quantity of each number that should be written by myself would be a matter for discussion and arrangement. Of course I should pledge and bind myself upon that head. Nobody but myself would ever pursue these ideas, but I must have assistance of course, and there must be some contents of a different kind. Their general nature might be agreed upon beforehand, but I should stipulate that this assistance is chosen solely by myself, and that the contents of every number are as much under my own control, and subject to as little interference, as those of a number of Pickwick or Nickleby.
"The amount of each issue that I should write would be open for discussion and planning. Of course, I would commit to that. No one but me would ever pursue these ideas, but I definitely need help, and there has to be some content of a different nature. We could agree on the general concept beforehand, but I would insist that I choose this help myself, and that the content of each issue is entirely under my control and subject to minimal interference, just like any issue of Pickwick or Nickleby.
"In order to give fresh novelty and interest to this undertaking, I should be ready to contract to go at any specified time (say in the midsummer or autumn of the year, when a sufficient quantity of matter in advance should have been prepared, or earlier if it were thought fit) either to Ireland or to America, and to write from thence a series of papers descriptive of the places and people I see, introducing local tales, traditions, and legends, something after the plan of Washington Irving's Alhambra. I should wish the republication of these papers in a separate form, with others[196] to render the subject complete (if we should deem it advisable), to form part of the arrangement for the work; and I should wish the same provision to be made for the republication of the Gog and Magog series, or indeed any that I undertook.
To bring fresh excitement and interest to this project, I would be willing to agree to travel at a set time (like in midsummer or autumn, when there would be enough material ready, or sooner if needed) either to Ireland or to America, and to write a series of articles describing the places and people I encounter, including local stories, traditions, and legends, similar to Washington Irving's Alhambra. I would also want these articles to be published separately, along with others[196] to cover the topic completely (if we decide it's a good idea), as part of the plan for the work; I would like the same option for republishing the Gog and Magog series, or any other series I take on.
"This is a very rough and slight outline of the project I have in view. I am ready to talk the matter over, to give any further explanations, to consider any suggestions, or to go into the details of the subject immediately. I say nothing of the novelty of such a publication nowadays, or its chances of success. Of course I think them very great, very great indeed,—almost beyond calculation,—or I should not seek to bind myself to anything so extensive.
"This is a basic outline of the project I have in mind. I'm ready to discuss it, provide more explanations, consider any suggestions, or dive into the details right away. I won't mention how unique this kind of publication is today, or its chances of succeeding. Naturally, I believe those chances are very high—almost incalculable—otherwise, I wouldn't commit to something so ambitious."
"The heads of the terms upon which I should be prepared to go into this undertaking would be—That I be made a proprietor in the work and a sharer in the profits. That when I bind myself to write a certain portion of every number, I am insured, for that writing in every number, a certain sum of money. That those who assist me, and contribute the remainder of every number, shall be paid by the publishers immediately after its appearance, according to a scale to be calculated and agreed upon, on presenting my order for the amount to which they may be respectively entitled. Or, if the publishers prefer it, that they agree to pay me a certain sum for the whole of every number, and leave me to make such arrangements for that part which I may not write, as I think best. Of course I should require that for these payments, or any other outlay connected with the work, I am not held accountable in any way; and that no portion of them is to be considered[197] as received by me on account of the profits. I need not add that some arrangement would have to be made, if I undertake my Travels, relative to the expenses of traveling.
The key terms I’d need to agree to this project would be—That I become a partner in the work and share in the profits. That when I commit to writing a specific portion of each issue, I’m guaranteed a certain amount of money for that writing in every issue. That those who help me and contribute the rest of each issue will be paid by the publishers right after it’s released, based on a scale to be calculated and agreed upon, upon presenting my order for the amount they’re entitled to. Alternatively, if the publishers prefer, they can agree to pay me a fixed amount for the entire issue, and I can make arrangements for the parts I don’t write as I see fit. Of course, I’d require that for these payments or any other expenses related to the work, I’m not held responsible in any way; and none of these amounts should be considered as received by me from the profits. I should also mention that some arrangement would need to be made if I take on my Travels regarding travel expenses.
"Now, I want our publishing friends to take these things into consideration, and to give me the views and proposals they would be disposed to entertain when they have maturely considered the matter."
"Now, I want our publishing friends to think about these things and share their thoughts and proposals that they might be willing to consider once they’ve thought it through."
The result of their consideration was, on the whole, satisfactory. An additional fifteen hundred pounds was to be paid at the close of Nickleby, the new adventure was to be undertaken, and Cattermole was to be joined with Browne as its illustrator. Nor was its plan much modified before starting, though it was felt by us all that, for the opening numbers at least, Dickens would have to be sole contributor, and that, whatever otherwise might be its attraction, or the success of the detached papers proposed by him, some reinforcement of them from time to time, by means of a story with his name continued at reasonable if not regular intervals, would be found absolutely necessary. Without any such planned story, however, the work did actually begin, its course afterwards being determined by circumstances stronger than any project he had formed. The agreement, drawn up in contemplation of a mere miscellany of detached papers or essays, and in which no mention of any story appeared, was signed at the end of March; and its terms were such as to place him in his only proper and legitimate position in regard to all such contracts, of being necessarily a gainer in any case, and, in the event of success, the greatest gainer of all concerned in the undertaking. All the risk of[198] every kind was to be undergone by the publishers; and, as part of the expenses to be defrayed by them of each weekly number, he was to receive fifty pounds. Whatever the success or failure, this was always to be paid. The numbers were then to be accounted for separately, and half the realized profits paid to him, the other half going to the publishers; each number being held strictly responsible for itself, and the loss upon it, supposing any, not carried to the general account. The work was to be continued for twelve months certain, with leave to the publishers then to close it; but if they elected to go on, he was himself bound to the enterprise for five years, and the ultimate copyright as well as profit was to be equally divided.
The outcome of their discussion was generally positive. An additional fifteen hundred pounds would be paid at the end of Nickleby, a new project was set to launch, and Cattermole was to join Browne as the illustrator. The plan didn't change much before starting, though we all agreed that for at least the opening issues, Dickens would need to be the only contributor. Despite whatever other attractions or success the separate pieces he proposed might have, we felt that he would need to regularly add a story with his name to keep it interesting. Without any planned story, however, the work actually began, with its direction later determined by circumstances beyond any initial plans he had. The agreement, created with the idea of a simple collection of separate articles or essays, and which didn’t mention any story, was signed at the end of March. The terms guaranteed that he would be in the best possible position regarding all such contracts, ensuring he would benefit no matter the outcome, and if it was successful, he would gain the most from the project. All the risks of any kind would fall on the publishers; as part of the expenses for each weekly issue, he was to receive fifty pounds. This amount would always be paid regardless of success or failure. Each issue would be handled separately, with half of the profits going to him and the other half to the publishers; each issue would be responsible for its own results, and any losses wouldn’t affect the overall accounting. The project was set to continue for a guaranteed twelve months, with the option for the publishers to end it then; however, if they chose to continue, he would be committed to the project for five years, and both the copyright and profits would be split equally.
Six weeks before signature of this agreement, while a title was still undetermined, I had this letter from him: "I will dine with you. I intended to spend the evening in strict meditation (as I did last night); but perhaps I had better go out, lest all work and no play should make me a dull boy. I have a list of titles too, but the final title I have determined on—or something very near it. I have a notion of this old file in the queer house, opening the book by an account of himself, and, among other peculiarities, of his affection for an old quaint queer-cased clock; showing how that when they have sat alone together in the long evenings, he has got accustomed to its voice, and come to consider it as the voice of a friend; how its striking, in the night, has seemed like an assurance to him that it was still, a cheerful watcher at his chamber-door; and now its very face has seemed to have something of welcome in its dusty features, and to relax from its[199] grimness when he has looked at it from his chimney-corner. Then I mean to tell how that he has kept odd manuscripts in the old, deep, dark, silent closet where the weights are; and taken them from thence to read (mixing up his enjoyments with some notion of his clock); and how, when the club came to be formed, they, by reason of their punctuality and his regard for this dumb servant, took their name from it. And thus I shall call the book either Old Humphrey's Clock, or Master Humphrey's Clock; beginning with a woodcut of old Humphrey and his clock, and explaining the why and wherefore. All Humphrey's own papers will be dated then From my clock-side, and I have divers thoughts about the best means of introducing the others. I thought about this all day yesterday and all last night till I went to bed. I am sure I can make a good thing of this opening, which I have thoroughly warmed up to in consequence."
Six weeks before signing this agreement, while the title was still undecided, I received this letter from him: "I will have dinner with you. I planned to spend the evening in deep thought (like I did last night); but maybe I should go out, so all work and no play doesn’t make me a dull boy. I have a list of titles too, but the final title I’ve settled on—or something very close to it. I imagine this old file in the strange house, starting the book with a story about himself, and among other quirks, his fondness for an old, oddly-shaped clock; how during long evenings spent alone together, he became accustomed to its ticking and began to see it as the voice of a friend; how its chimes at night reassured him that it was still there, a cheerful guardian at his bedroom door; and now its very face seems to hold a welcoming aspect in its dusty features, softening its sternness when he looks at it from his cozy corner. Then I plan to share how he kept odd manuscripts in the old, dark, quiet closet where the weights are; and pulled them out to read (mixing his delights with thoughts of his clock); and how, when the club was formed, they named themselves after it because of their punctuality and his fondness for this silent companion. So, I’ll call the book either *Old Humphrey's Clock* or *Master Humphrey's Clock*; starting with an illustration of old Humphrey and his clock, and explaining the reason behind it. All of Humphrey's own papers will be dated from my clock-side, and I have several ideas about the best way to introduce the others. I thought about this all day yesterday and all last night until I went to bed. I’m sure I can create something great with this opening, which I’ve really warmed up to as a result."
A few days later: "I incline rather more to Master Humphrey's Clock than Old Humphrey's—if so be that there is no danger of the pensive confounding master with a boy." After two days more: "I was thinking all yesterday, and have begun at Master Humphrey to-day." Then, a week later: "I have finished the first number, but have not been able to do more in the space than lead up to the Giants, who are just on the scene."
A few days later: "I prefer Master Humphrey's Clock over Old Humphrey's—as long as there's no risk of mixing up the thoughtful master with a boy." Two days later: "I was thinking about it all yesterday, and I started on Master Humphrey today." Then, a week later: "I've finished the first issue, but I haven't been able to do more than introduce the Giants, who are just about to appear."
CHAPTER XII.
THE OLD CURIOSITY SHOP.
1840-1841.
A day or two after the date of the last letter quoted, Dickens and his wife, with Maclise and myself, visited Landor in Bath, and it was during three happy days we passed together there that the fancy which was shortly to take the form of Little Nell first occurred to its author,[29]—but as yet with the intention only of making[201] out of it a tale of a few chapters. On the 1st of March we returned from Bath; and on the 4th I had this letter: "If you can manage to give me a call in the course of the day or evening, I wish you would. I am laboriously turning over in my mind how I can best effect the improvement we spoke of last night, which I will certainly make by hook or by crook, and which I would like you to see before it goes finally to the printer's. I have determined not to put that witch-story into number 3, for I am by no means satisfied of the effect of its contrast with Humphrey. I think of lengthening Humphrey, finishing the description of the society, and closing with the little child-story, which is sure to be effective, especially after the old man's quiet way."[202] Then there came hard upon this: "What do you think of the following double title for the beginning of that little tale? 'Personal Adventures of Master Humphrey: The Old Curiosity Shop.' I have thought of Master Humphrey's Tale, Master Humphrey's Narrative, A Passage in Master Humphrey's Life—but I don't think any does as well as this. I have also thought of The Old Curiosity Dealer and the Child instead of The Old Curiosity Shop. Perpend. Topping waits."——And thus was taking gradual form, with less direct consciousness of design on his own part than I can remember in any other instance of all his career, a story which was to add largely to his popularity, more than any other of his works to make the bond between himself and his readers one of personal attachment, and very widely to increase the sense entertained of his powers as a pathetic as well as humorous writer.
A day or two after the last quoted letter, Dickens and his wife, along with Maclise and me, visited Landor in Bath. It was during the three enjoyable days we spent there that the idea which would soon become Little Nell first came to its author,[29]—but at that time, he only intended to make it a short tale of a few chapters. On March 1st, we returned from Bath, and on the 4th, I received this letter: "If you can stop by today or this evening, I’d really appreciate it. I’m working hard to figure out how to best make the improvements we discussed last night, which I’m definitely going to do by any means necessary, and I’d like you to see it before it goes to the printer. I’ve decided not to include that witch story in number 3 because I’m not happy with how it contrasts with Humphrey. I’m thinking about extending Humphrey, finishing the society description, and ending with the little child story, which is sure to be impactful, especially after the old man’s calm demeanor."[202] Then right after this, he asked, "What do you think about this double title for the beginning of that little tale? 'Humphrey's Personal Adventures: The Old Curiosity Shop.' I thought about Master Humphrey's Tale, Master Humphrey's Narrative, A Passage in Master Humphrey's Life—but I don’t think any of those are as good as this. I also considered The Old Curiosity Dealer and the Child instead of The Old Curiosity Shop. Think about it. Topping is waiting."——And so was gradually taking shape, with less conscious planning on his part than I can remember in any other instance throughout his career, a story that would significantly increase his popularity, more than any of his other works, create a personal connection between him and his readers, and greatly enhance the public perception of his abilities as both a tragic and humorous writer.
He had not written more than two or three chapters, when the capability of the subject for more extended treatment than he had at first proposed to give to it pressed itself upon him, and he resolved to throw everything else aside, devoting himself to the one story only. There were other strong reasons for this. Of the first number of the Clock nearly seventy thousand were sold; but with the discovery that there was no continuous tale the orders at once diminished, and a change must have been made even if the material and means for it had not been ready. There had been an interval of three numbers between the first and second chapters, which the society of Mr. Pickwick and the two Wellers made pleasant enough; but after the introduction of Dick Swiveller there were three consecutive chapters;[203] and in the continued progress of the tale to its close there were only two more breaks, one between the fourth and fifth chapters and one between the eighth and ninth, pardonable and enjoyable now for the sake of Sam and his father. The reintroduction of these old favorites, it will have been seen, formed part of his original plan; of his abandonment of which his own description may be added, from his preface to the collected edition: "The first chapter of this tale appeared in the fourth number of Master Humphrey's Clock, when I had already been made uneasy by the desultory character of that work, and when, I believe, my readers had thoroughly participated in the feeling. The commencement of a story was a great satisfaction to me, and I had reason to believe that my readers participated in this feeling too. Hence, being pledged to some interruptions and some pursuit of the original design, I set cheerfully about disentangling myself from those impediments as fast as I could; and, this done, from that time until its completion The Old Curiosity Shop was written and published from week to week, in weekly parts."
He had only written two or three chapters when he realized the topic had more depth than he initially thought and decided to focus solely on that one story. There were other strong reasons for this. Nearly seventy thousand copies of the first issue of the Clock had sold, but when readers discovered there wasn’t a continuous story, the orders immediately dropped, making a change necessary even if he hadn’t been prepared with material for it. There had been a gap of three issues between the first and second chapters, which was made enjoyable by the company of Mr. Pickwick and the two Wellers; however, after Dick Swiveller was introduced, there were three chapters in a row;[203] and as the story progressed toward its conclusion, there were only two more breaks—one between the fourth and fifth chapters and one between the eighth and ninth, which were easy to forgive and enjoyable due to Sam and his father. The reintroduction of these beloved characters was part of his original plan; as he described in his preface to the collected edition: "The first chapter of this tale appeared in the fourth issue of Master Humphrey's Clock, at a time when I was already feeling uneasy about the scattered nature of that work, and I believe my readers felt the same. Starting a story brought me great satisfaction, and I had reason to believe my readers shared that sentiment as well. Therefore, being committed to some interruptions and pursuing the original idea, I cheerfully set to work on untangling myself from those obstacles as quickly as I could; and having done this, from that point until its completion, The Old Curiosity Shop was written and published weekly, in parts."
He had very early himself become greatly taken with it. "I am very glad indeed," he wrote to me after the first half-dozen chapters, "that you think so well of the Curiosity Shop, and especially that what may be got out of Dick strikes you. I mean to make much of him. I feel the story extremely myself, which I take to be a good sign; and am already warmly interested in it. I shall run it on now for four whole numbers together, to give it a fair chance." Every step lightened the road as it became more and more real with[204] each character that appeared in it, and I still recall the glee with which he told me what he intended to do not only with Dick Swiveller, but with Septimus Brass, changed afterwards to Sampson. Undoubtedly, however, Dick was his favorite. "Dick's behavior in the matter of Miss Wackles will, I hope, give you satisfaction," is the remark of another of his letters. "I cannot yet discover that his aunt has any belief in him, or is in the least degree likely to send him a remittance, so that he will probably continue to be the sport of destiny." His difficulties were the quickly recurring times of publication, the confined space in each number that yet had to contribute its individual effect, and (from the suddenness with which he had begun) the impossibility of getting in advance. "I was obliged to cramp most dreadfully what I thought a pretty idea in the last chapter. I hadn't room to turn:" to this or a similar effect his complaints are frequent, and of the vexations named it was by far the worst. But he steadily bore up against all, and made a triumph of the little story.
He had really become quite fascinated with it early on. "I'm really glad," he wrote to me after the first six chapters, "that you think so highly of the Curiosity Shop, and especially that you appreciate what can be drawn from Dick. I intend to focus a lot on him. I feel really connected to the story, which I think is a good sign, and I'm already emotionally invested in it. I'm going to keep it going for four whole issues in a row to give it a fair shot." Each step made the path easier as it became more real with[204] every character introduced, and I still remember the excitement with which he shared his plans not just for Dick Swiveller, but for Septimus Brass, who was later renamed Sampson. Undoubtedly, Dick was his favorite. "I hope Dick's actions regarding Miss Wackles will satisfy you," he mentioned in another letter. "I still haven't found any evidence that his aunt believes in him or is likely to send him money, so he'll probably remain at fate's mercy." His challenges included the tight publishing schedule, the limited space in each issue that still had to deliver its own unique impact, and (due to how suddenly he started) the inability to plan ahead. "I had to squeeze down what I thought was a great idea in the last chapter. I didn't have space to work with;” his complaints about this or something similar came up often, and among these frustrations, this was by far the worst. But he consistently pushed through all of it and turned the little story into a success.
To help his work he went twice to Broadstairs, in June and in September. From this he wrote to me (17th June), "It's now four o'clock, and I have been at work since half-past eight. I have really dried myself up into a condition which would almost justify me in pitching off the cliff, head first—but I must get richer before I indulge in a crowning luxury. Number 15, which I began to-day, I anticipate great things from. There is a description of getting gradually out of town, and passing through neighborhoods of distinct and various characters, with which, if I had read[205] it as anybody else's writing, I think I should have been very much struck. The child and the old man are on their journey of course, and the subject is a very pretty one." Between these two Broadstairs visits he wrote to me, "I intended calling on you this morning on my way back from Bevis Marks, whither I went to look at a house for Sampson Brass. But I got mingled up in a kind of social paste with the Jews of Houndsditch, and roamed about among them till I came out in Moorfields, quite unexpectedly. So I got into a cab, and came home again, very tired, by way of the City Road." At the opening of September he was again at Broadstairs. The residence he most desired there, Fort House, stood prominently at the top of a breezy hill on the road to Kingsgate, with a corn-field between it and the sea, and this in many subsequent years he always occupied; but he was fain to be content, as yet, with Lawn House, a smaller villa between the hill and the corn-field, from which he now wrote of his attentions to Mr. Sampson Brass's sister: "I have been at work of course" (2d September), "and have just finished a number. I have effected a reform by virtue of which we breakfast at a quarter-before eight, so that I get to work at half-past, and am commonly free by one o'clock or so, which is a great happiness. Dick is now Sampson's clerk, and I have touched Miss Brass in Number 25, lightly, but effectively I hope."
To help with his work, he went to Broadstairs twice, once in June and once in September. He wrote to me on June 17th, "It's now four o'clock, and I've been working since 8:30. I've really worn myself out to the point where I might as well jump off the cliff headfirst—but I need to get richer before I indulge in such a luxury. I expect great things from Number 15, which I started today. There's a description of gradually leaving the city and passing through neighborhoods with distinct and diverse characteristics. If I had read it as someone else's writing, I think it would have impressed me a lot. The child and the old man are, of course, on their journey, and the subject is quite lovely." Between these two visits to Broadstairs, he wrote to me, "I planned to stop by and see you this morning on my way back from Bevis Marks, where I went to check out a house for Sampson Brass. But I got caught up in a social mix with the Jews of Houndsditch and wandered around until I unexpectedly ended up in Moorfields. So, I took a cab and came home, very tired, via the City Road." At the beginning of September, he was back in Broadstairs. The place he really wanted, Fort House, was situated at the top of a breezy hill on the way to Kingsgate, with a cornfield between it and the sea, which he always occupied in later years. But for now, he had to settle for Lawn House, a smaller villa located between the hill and the cornfield. From there, he wrote about his attention to Mr. Sampson Brass's sister: "I've been working, of course" (September 2nd), "and have just finished a number. I've managed to reform our breakfast schedule so that we eat at a quarter to eight, which means I can start working at 8:30 and usually finish by one o'clock or so, which is really nice. Dick is now Sampson's clerk, and I've touched on Miss Brass in Number 25, lightly but hopefully effectively."
At this point it became necessary to close the first volume of the Clock, which was issued accordingly with a dedication to Rogers, and a preface to which allusion will be made hereafter. "I have opened the second[206] volume," he wrote to me on the 9th of September, "with Kit; and I saw this morning looking out at the sea, as if a veil had been lifted up, an affecting thing that I can do with him by-and-by. Nous verrons." "I am glad you like that Kit number," he wrote twelve days later; "I thought you would. I have altered that about the opera-going. Of course I had no intention to delude the many-headed into a false belief concerning opera-nights, but merely to specify a class of senators. I needn't have done it, however, for God knows they're pretty well all alike." This referred to an objection made by me to something he had written of "opera-going senators on Wednesday nights;" and, of another change made in compliance with some other objection of mine, he wrote on the 4th of October, "You will receive the proof herewith. I have altered it. You must let it stand now. I really think the dead mankind a million fathoms deep, the best thing in the sentence. I have a notion of the dreadful silence down there, and of the stars shining down upon their drowned eyes,—the fruit, let me tell you, of a solitary walk by starlight on the cliffs. As to the child-image, I have made a note of it for alteration. In number thirty there will be some cutting needed, I think. I have, however, something in my eye near the beginning which I can easily take out. You will recognize a description of the road we traveled between Birmingham and Wolverhampton; but I had conceived it so well in my mind that the execution doesn't please me quite as well as I expected. I shall be curious to know whether you think there's anything in the notion of the man and his furnace-fire. It would have been a good thing to[207] have opened a new story with, I have been thinking since."
At this point, it was necessary to wrap up the first volume of the Clock, which was published with a dedication to Rogers and a preface that will be referenced later. "I've started on the second[206] volume," he wrote to me on September 9, "with Kit; and this morning, while looking out at the sea, it felt like a veil was lifted—I saw something moving that we can discuss later. We'll see." "I'm glad you liked that Kit number," he wrote twelve days later; "I thought you would. I've changed that part about opera-going. I never meant to mislead anyone about opera nights, just wanted to point out a type of senator. I probably didn’t need to clarify at all, because God knows they’re pretty much all the same.” This referred to a complaint I had about something he wrote regarding "opera-going senators on Wednesday nights." In response to another change he made based on my feedback, he wrote on October 4, "You’ll receive the proof with this. I’ve made the changes. It has to stay as it is now. Honestly, I think the phrase about the dead mankind a million fathoms deep is the best part of the sentence. I can picture the terrible silence down there and the stars shining on their drowned eyes—let me tell you, that image came from a lonely walk under the stars on the cliffs. As for the child-image, I’ve made a note to change that. In number thirty, I think there will need to be some cuts. However, there’s something at the beginning that I can easily remove. You’ll recognize the description of the road we took between Birmingham and Wolverhampton; I had a clear vision of it in my mind, but the way it turned out didn’t quite match my expectations. I’m curious to know what you think about the idea of the man and his furnace-fire. It would have been a great way to start a new story, something I’ve been thinking about since.”
In the middle of October he returned to town, and by the end of the month he had so far advanced that the close of the story began to be not far distant. "Tell me what you think," he had written just before his return, "of 36 and 37? The way is clear for Kit now, and for a great effect at the last with the Marchioness." The last allusion I could not in the least understand, until I found, in the numbers just sent me, those exquisite chapters of the tale, the 57th and 58th, in which Dick Swiveller realizes his threat to Miss Wackles, discovers the small creature that his destiny is expressly saving up for him, dubs her Marchioness, and teaches her the delights of hot purl and cribbage. This is comedy of the purest kind; its great charm being the good-hearted fellow's kindness to the poor desolate child hiding itself under cover of what seems only mirth and fun. Altogether, and because of rather than in spite of his weakness, Dick is a captivating person. His gayety and good humor survive such accumulations of "staggerers," he makes such discoveries of the "rosy" in the very smallest of drinks, and becomes himself by his solacements of verse such a "perpetual grand Apollo," that his failings are all forgiven, and hearts resolutely shut against victims of destiny in general open themselves freely to Dick Swiveller.
In the middle of October, he returned to town, and by the end of the month, he had made enough progress that the end of the story was not far off. "Let me know what you think about 36 and 37," he had written just before coming back. "The way is clear for Kit now, and there's a great moment coming up with the Marchioness." I couldn't understand that last part at all until I found, in the recent chapters he sent me, the beautiful chapters 57 and 58, where Dick Swiveller fulfills his promise to Miss Wackles, discovers the little creature that fate has set aside for him, calls her Marchioness, and introduces her to the joys of hot purl and cribbage. This is pure comedy; its main appeal is the kind-hearted guy's care for the poor, lonely child hiding beneath what seems like mere laughter and fun. All in all, and because of rather than despite his flaws, Dick is a charming character. His cheerfulness and good spirits endure through his many setbacks, he finds the bright side even in the tiniest drinks, and through his comfort in poetry, he becomes such a "perpetual grand Apollo" that his shortcomings are all overlooked, and hearts that are usually closed off to the misfortunes of others open up easily to Dick Swiveller.
At the opening of November, there seems to have been a wish on Maclise's part to try his hand at an illustration for the story; but I do not remember that it bore other fruit than a very pleasant day at Jack Straw's Castle, where Dickens read one of the later[208] numbers to us. "Maclise and myself (alone in the carriage)," he wrote, "will be with you at two exactly. We propose driving out to Hampstead and walking there, if it don't rain in buckets'-full. I sha'n't send Bradburys' the MS. of next number till to-morrow, for it contains the shadow of the number after that, and I want to read it to Mac, as, if he likes the subject, it will furnish him with one, I think. You can't imagine (gravely I write and speak) how exhausted I am to-day with yesterday's labors. I went to bed last night utterly dispirited and done up. All night I have been pursued by the child; and this morning I am unrefreshed and miserable. I don't know what to do with myself. . . . I think the close of the story will be great." Connected with the same design on Maclise's part there was another reading, this time at my house, and of the number shadowed forth by what had been read at Hampstead. "I will bring the MS.," he writes on the 12th of November, "and, for Mac's information if needful, the number before it. I have only this moment put the finishing touch to it. The difficulty has been tremendous—the anguish unspeakable. I didn't say six. Therefore dine at half-past five like a Christian. I shall bring Mac at that hour."
At the beginning of November, it seems Maclise wanted to try illustrating the story, but I don’t remember it leading to much more than a really nice day at Jack Straw's Castle, where Dickens read one of the later[208] issues to us. "Maclise and I (just the two of us in the carriage)," he wrote, "will meet you at exactly two o'clock. We're planning to drive out to Hampstead and take a walk there, as long as it doesn't rain heavily. I won't send Bradburys the manuscript of the next issue until tomorrow because it contains hints of the one after that, and I want to read it to Mac, since if he likes the topic, it will give him something to work with, I think. You can't imagine (I say this seriously) how exhausted I am today from yesterday's work. I went to bed last night totally defeated and worn out. All night I've been tormented by the child; now, this morning, I feel drained and miserable. I don’t know what to do with myself... I think the ending of the story will be fantastic." Related to Maclise's plans, there was another reading at my house, and it was of the issue hinted at by what was read at Hampstead. "I’ll bring the manuscript," he wrote on November 12th, "and, for Mac's reference if necessary, the previous number. I just added the final touch to it. The struggle has been huge—the pain indescribable. I didn't say six. So please have dinner at half-past five like a decent person. I'll bring Mac then."
He had sent me, shortly before, the chapters in which the Marchioness nurses Dick in his fever, and puts his favorite philosophy to the hard test of asking him whether he has ever put pieces of orange-peel into cold water and made believe it was wine. "If you make believe very much, it's quite nice; but if you don't, you know, it hasn't much flavor:" so it stood originally, and to the latter word in the little creature's mouth[209] I seem to have objected. Replying (on the 16th of December) he writes, "'If you make believe very much, it's quite nice; but if you don't, you know, it seems as if it would bear a little more seasoning, certainly.' I think that's better. Flavor is a common word in cookery, and among cooks, and so I used it. The part you cut out in the other number, which was sent me this morning, I had put in with a view to Quilp's last appearance on any stage, which is casting its shadow upon my mind; but it will come well enough without such a preparation, so I made no change. I mean to shirk Sir Robert Inglis, and work to-night. I have been solemnly revolving the general story all this morning. The forty-fifth number will certainly close. Perhaps this forty-first, which I am now at work on, had better contain the announcement of Barnaby? I am glad you like Dick and the Marchioness in that sixty-fourth chapter. I thought you would."
He had sent me, shortly before, the chapters where the Marchioness takes care of Dick during his fever and puts his favorite philosophy to the test by asking him if he has ever put pieces of orange peel in cold water and pretended it was wine. "If you pretend a lot, it's pretty nice; but if you don't, you know, it doesn't have much flavor," is how it was originally stated, and I think I had a problem with the last word in the little creature's mouth[209]. In his reply (on December 16th), he writes, "If you pretend a lot, it's pretty nice; but if you don't, you know, it seems like it could use a little more seasoning, definitely." I think that's better. Flavor is a common term in cooking, and among chefs, so I used it. The part you took out in the other issue, which I received this morning, I included thinking about Quilp's last appearance on any stage, which is lingering in my mind; but it will be fine without that setup, so I made no changes. I plan to avoid Sir Robert Inglis and work tonight. I've been seriously thinking about the overall story all morning. The forty-fifth issue will definitely conclude it. Maybe this forty-first issue, which I'm currently working on, should announce Barnaby? I'm glad you like Dick and the Marchioness in that sixty-fourth chapter. I thought you would.
Fast shortening as the life of little Nell was now, the dying year might have seen it pass away; but I never knew him wind up any tale with such a sorrowful reluctance as this. He caught at any excuse to hold his hand from it, and stretched to the utmost limit the time left to complete it in. Christmas interposed its delays too, so that Twelfth-night had come and gone when I wrote to him in the belief that he was nearly done. "Done!" he wrote back to me on Friday, the 7th; "Done!!! Why, bless you, I shall not be done till Wednesday night. I only began yesterday, and this part of the story is not to be galloped over, I can tell you. I think it will come famously—but I am the wretchedest of the wretched. It casts the most horrible[210] shadow upon me, and it is as much as I can do to keep moving at all. I tremble to approach the place a great deal more than Kit; a great deal more than Mr. Garland; a great deal more than the Single Gentleman. I sha'n't recover it for a long time. Nobody will miss her like I shall. It is such a very painful thing to me, that I really cannot express my sorrow. Old wounds bleed afresh when I only think of the way of doing it: what the actual doing it will be, God knows. I can't preach to myself the schoolmaster's consolation, though I try. Dear Mary died yesterday, when I think of this sad story. I don't know what to say about dining to-morrow—perhaps you'll send up to-morrow morning for news? That'll be the best way. I have refused several invitations for this week and next, determining to go nowhere till I had done. I am afraid of disturbing the state I have been trying to get into, and having to fetch it all back again." He had finished, all but the last chapter, on the Wednesday named; that was the 12th of January; and on the following night he read to me the two chapters of Nell's death, the seventy-first and seventy-second, with the result described in a letter to me of the following Monday, the 17th January, 1841:
As quickly as little Nell's life was coming to an end, the dying year could have seen it pass away; but I’ve never known him to end a story with such a heartbreaking reluctance. He grasped at any excuse to delay finishing it and stretched out the time he had left to complete it. Christmas added its own delays, so Twelfth Night had come and gone by the time I wrote to him, thinking he was nearly done. “Done!” he replied to me on Friday, the 7th; “Done!!! Why, bless you, I won’t be done until Wednesday night. I only started yesterday, and I can assure you this part of the story shouldn’t be rushed. I think it will turn out beautifully—but I feel like the most miserable person alive. It casts such a dark shadow over me that it’s all I can do to keep moving. I’m much more terrified to approach the end than Kit; far more than Mr. Garland; way more than the Single Gentleman. It’s going to take me a long time to get over it. Nobody will miss her like I will. It’s such a painful thing for me that I really can’t express my sadness. Old wounds reopen just thinking about how to do it; what the actual experience will be, only God knows. I can’t convince myself with the schoolmaster’s comfort, though I try. Dear Mary died yesterday as I think of this sad story. I don’t know what to say about dinner tomorrow—maybe you’ll send someone tomorrow morning for an update? That would be the best way. I’ve turned down several invitations for this week and next, deciding not to go anywhere until I finish. I’m afraid of disrupting the mindset I’ve been trying to achieve, and having to get it all back again.” He finished everything except the last chapter by the mentioned Wednesday, which was January 12th; and on the following night, he read to me the two chapters covering Nell's death, the seventy-first and seventy-second, leading to the outcome described in a letter to me the following Monday, January 17th, 1841:
"I can't help letting you know how much your yesterday's letter pleased me. I felt sure you liked the chapters when we read them on Thursday night, but it was a great delight to have my impression so strongly and heartily confirmed. You know how little value I should set on what I had done, if all the world cried out that it was good, and those whose good opinion and approbation I value most were silent. The assurance[211] that this little closing of the scene touches and is felt by you so strongly, is better to me than a thousand most sweet voices out of doors. When I first began, on your valued suggestion, to keep my thoughts upon this ending of the tale, I resolved to try and do something which might be read by people about whom Death had been, with a softened feeling, and with consolation. . . . After you left last night, I took my desk up-stairs, and, writing until four o'clock this morning, finished the old story. It makes me very melancholy to think that all these people are lost to me forever, and I feel as if I never could become attached to any new set of characters." The words printed in italics, as underlined by himself, give me my share in the story which had gone so closely to his heart. I was responsible for its tragic ending. He had not thought of killing her, when, about half-way through, I asked him to consider whether it did not necessarily belong even to his own conception, after taking so mere a child through such a tragedy of sorrow, to lift her also out of the commonplace of ordinary happy endings so that the gentle pure little figure and form should never change to the fancy. All that I meant he seized at once, and never turned aside from it again.
I can't help but tell you how much I loved your letter from yesterday. I was pretty sure you enjoyed the chapters when we read them together on Thursday night, but it was such a pleasure to have my feelings confirmed so strongly and sincerely. You know I wouldn't care much about what I've done if everyone else said it was great and the people whose opinions I value most stayed quiet. The fact that this little conclusion of the story resonates with you so deeply means more to me than a thousand praises from outside. When I first started, based on your valued suggestion, to focus on this ending, I decided to create something that people who have dealt with Death could read and find some comfort in. After you left last night, I took my desk upstairs and wrote until four o'clock this morning, finishing the old story. It makes me really sad to think that all these characters are lost to me forever, and I feel like I could never get attached to a new group of characters. The words in italics, as he underlined himself, give me my connection to the story that was so dear to him. I was responsible for its tragic ending. He hadn't thought about killing her when, about halfway through, I asked him to consider whether it was necessary to lift her out of the ordinary happy endings after taking such a young child through this tragedy, so that the gentle, pure little figure wouldn't ever change in our imaginations. He understood everything I meant immediately and never wavered from it again.
The published book was an extraordinary success, and, in America more especially, very greatly increased the writer's fame. The pathetic vein it had opened was perhaps mainly the cause of this, but opinion at home continued still to turn on the old characteristics,—the freshness of humor of which the pathos was but another form and product, the grasp of reality with which character had again been seized, the discernment[212] of good under its least attractive forms and of evil in its most captivating disguises, the cordial wisdom and sound heart, the enjoyment and fun, luxuriant yet under proper control. No falling-off was found in these; and I doubt if any of his people have been more widely liked than Dick Swiveller and the Marchioness. The characters generally, indeed, work out their share in the purpose of the tale; the extravagances of some of them help to intensify its meaning; and the sayings and doings of the worst and the best alike have their point and applicability. Many an oversuspicious person will find advantage in remembering what a too liberal application of Foxey's principle of suspecting everybody brought Mr. Sampson Brass to; and many an overhasty judgment of poor human nature will unconsciously be checked, when it is remembered that Mr. Christopher Nubbles did come back to work out that shilling.
The published book was a huge success, especially in America, which greatly boosted the writer's fame. The emotional depth it revealed was probably the main reason for this, but opinions back home still focused on the old traits—the freshness of humor that was just another expression of the pathos, the realistic grasp of characters, the insight into good under its least appealing forms and evil in its most charming disguises, the warm wisdom and kind heart, the enjoyment and fun that was rich yet well-controlled. There was no decline in these aspects; and I doubt any of his characters have been more widely loved than Dick Swiveller and the Marchioness. The characters generally fulfill their roles in the story; the eccentricities of some heighten its meaning; and the actions and words of both the worst and the best characters carry their significance and relevance. Many overly suspicious people will benefit from remembering how Mr. Sampson Brass ended up as a result of excessively applying Foxey's principle of suspecting everyone; and many quick judgments about human nature will be unconsciously tempered when it's recalled that Mr. Christopher Nubbles actually came back to earn that shilling.
But the main idea and chief figure of the piece constitute its interest for most people, and give it rank upon the whole with the most attractive productions of English fiction. I am not acquainted with any story in the language more adapted to strengthen in the heart what most needs help and encouragement, to sustain kindly and innocent impulses, and to awaken everywhere the sleeping germs of good. It includes necessarily much pain, much uninterrupted sadness; and yet the brightness and sunshine quite overtop the gloom. The humor is so benevolent; the view of errors that have no depravity of heart in them is so indulgent; the quiet courage under calamity, the purity that nothing impure can soil, are so full of tender teaching. Its effect as a mere piece of art, too, considering[213] the circumstances in which I have shown it to be written, I think very noteworthy. It began with a plan for but a short half-dozen chapters; it grew into a full-proportioned story under the warmth of the feeling it had inspired its writer with; its very incidents created a necessity at first not seen; and it was carried to a close only contemplated after a full half of it had been written. Yet, from the opening of the tale to that undesigned ending,—from the image of little Nell asleep amid the quaint grotesque figures of the old curiosity warehouse to that other final sleep she takes among the grim forms and carvings of the old church aisle,—the main purpose seems to be always present. The characters and incidents that at first appear most foreign to it are found to have had with it a close relation. The hideous lumber and rottenness that surround the child in her grandfather's home take shape again in Quilp and his filthy gang. In the first still picture of Nell's innocence in the midst of strange and alien forms, we have the forecast of her after-wanderings, her patient miseries, her sad maturity of experience before its time. Without the show-people and their blended fictions and realities, their wax-works, dwarfs, giants, and performing dogs, the picture would have wanted some part of its significance. Nor could the genius of Hogarth himself have given it higher expression than in the scenes by the cottage door, the furnace-fire, and the burial-place of the old church, over whose tombs and gravestones hang the puppets of Mr. Punch's show while the exhibitors are mending and repairing them. And when, at last, Nell sits within the quiet old church where all her wanderings end, and gazes on those silent[214] monumental groups of warriors,—helmets, swords, and gauntlets wasting away around them,—the associations among which her life had opened seem to have come crowding on the scene again, to be present at its close,—but stripped of their strangeness; deepened into solemn shapes by the suffering she has undergone; gently fusing every feeling of a life past into hopeful and familiar anticipation of a life to come; and already imperceptibly lifting her, without grief or pain, from the earth she loves, yet whose grosser paths her light steps only touched to show the track through them to heaven. This is genuine art, and such as all cannot fail to recognize who read the book in a right sympathy with the conception that pervades it. Nor, great as the discomfort was of reading it in brief weekly snatches, can I be wholly certain that the discomfort of so writing it involved nothing but disadvantage. With so much in every portion to do, and so little space to do it in, the opportunities to a writer for mere self-indulgence were necessarily rare.
But the main idea and key character of the story are what draw most people in, placing it among the most appealing works of English fiction. I don’t know of any story in the language better suited to strengthen what needs support and encouragement in the heart, uplift kind and innocent impulses, and stir the dormant seeds of goodness everywhere. It necessarily contains a lot of pain and unrelenting sadness; yet the brightness and sunshine definitely outweigh the gloom. The humor is so generous; the perspective on mistakes that don’t stem from a corrupt heart is so forgiving; the quiet bravery in the face of adversity, and the purity that nothing impure can tarnish, carry such gentle lessons. Its effect as a work of art is also noteworthy, given the circumstances in which I’ve explained it was created. It started with a plan for just a short six chapters; it evolved into a full story fueled by the warmth of feeling it sparked in its writer; its very events created a necessity not initially apparent; and it reached a conclusion only considered after a good portion had been written. Yet, from the beginning of the tale to that unplanned ending—from the image of little Nell sleeping among the quirky figures of the old curiosity shop to that other final sleep she takes among the grim figures and carvings of the old church aisle—the main purpose seems to always be present. The characters and events that initially seem most unrelated to it are found to be closely tied. The hideous clutter and decay surrounding the child in her grandfather’s home reappear in Quilp and his filthy gang. In the first still image of Nell’s innocence amid the strange and foreign forms, we have a glimpse of her later wanderings, her patient sufferings, her sad maturity of experience before its time. Without the show-people and their mixed fictions and realities, their wax figures, dwarfs, giants, and performing dogs, the picture would have lost some of its significance. Nor could Hogarth’s genius himself have given it a higher expression than in the scenes by the cottage door, the furnace-fire, and the burial ground of the old church, over whose tombs and gravestones hang the puppets from Mr. Punch’s show while the exhibitors repair them. And when, at last, Nell sits in the quiet old church where all her wanderings end, gazing at those silent monumental groups of warriors—helmets, swords, and gauntlets decaying around them—the connections her life had opened seem to crowd back onto the scene at its end—but stripped of their strangeness; deepened into solemn shapes by the suffering she has endured; gently blending every feeling from a past life into hopeful and familiar anticipation of a future life; and already subtly lifting her, without grief or pain, from the earth she loves, yet whose coarser paths her light steps only touched to illuminate the way through them to heaven. This is genuine art, and anyone who reads the book with the right sympathy for the concept that flows throughout it can’t help but recognize it. And although reading it in small weekly portions was quite uncomfortable, I can't be entirely sure that this discomfort in writing it entailed only downsides. With so much to convey in every part and so little space to do it, a writer's chances for mere self-indulgence were necessarily limited.
Of the innumerable tributes the story has received, and to none other by Dickens have more or more various been paid, there is one, the very last, which has much affected me. Not many months before my friend's death, he had sent me two Overland Monthlies containing two sketches by a young American writer far away in California, "The Luck of Roaring Camp," and "The Outcasts of Poker Flat," in which he had found such subtle strokes of character as he had not anywhere else in late years discovered; the manner resembling himself, but the matter fresh to a degree that had surprised him; the painting in all respects masterly, and[215] the wild rude thing painted a quite wonderful reality. I have rarely known him more honestly moved. A few months passed; telegraph-wires flashed over the world that he had passed away on the 9th of June; and the young writer of whom he had then written to me, all unconscious of that praise, put his tribute of gratefulness and sorrow into the form of a poem called Dickens in Camp.[30] It embodies the same kind of incident which had so affected the master himself, in the papers to which I have referred; it shows the gentler influences which, in even those Californian wilds, can restore outlawed "roaring camps" to silence and humanity; and there is hardly any form of posthumous tribute which I can imagine likely to have better satisfied his desire of fame than one which should thus connect, with the special favorite among all his heroines, the restraints and authority exerted by his genius over the rudest and least civilized of competitors in that far fierce race for wealth.
Of all the countless tributes the story has received, and none other from Dickens has been more numerous or diverse, there's one, the very last, that truly moved me. Just months before my friend's death, he sent me two Overland Monthlies featuring sketches by a young American writer in California, "The Luck of Roaring Camp" and "The Outcasts of Poker Flat." He found such nuanced character depictions in them that he hadn't seen anywhere else in recent years; the style reminded him of his own, but the content was fresh enough to surprise him. The writing was expertly crafted, and the wild, rough elements depicted a striking reality. I’ve rarely seen him so genuinely touched. A few months later, the telegraph wires announced his passing on June 9th; the young writer, unaware of my friend's praise, expressed his gratitude and sorrow through a poem titled Dickens in Camp.[30] It captures the same kind of moments that had so deeply impacted the master himself in the writings I mentioned; it illustrates the gentler influences that, even in those Californian wildernesses, can bring outlawed "roaring camps" back to silence and humanity. I can't imagine a form of posthumous tribute that would better fulfill his desire for fame than one that connects, through his favorite among all his heroines, the control and authority exerted by his genius over the roughest and least civilized competitors in that fierce race for wealth.
The river flowed below;
The distant Sierras, rising up in the background
Their snow-covered minarets:
"The roaring camp-fire, with rude humor, painted
The healthy rosy color
On a tired face and body that slumped and weakened
In the intense competition for wealth;
"Till one arose, and from his pack's scant treasure
A hoarded book attracted,
And cards were dropped from the hands of bored relaxation.
[216]To hear the story again;
"And then, while round them shadows gathered faster,
And as the firelight faded,
He read aloud from the book where the Master
Had written about 'Little Nell:'
"Perhaps 'twas boyish fancy,—for the reader
Was the youngest of them all,—
But as he read, surrounded by pine and cedar trees,
A hush seemed to fall;
"The fir-trees, gathering closer in the shadows,
Listened in every splash,
While the entire camp with 'Nell' on English meadows
Wandered and lost their way.
"And so in mountain solitudes—o'ertaken
As if by some magic—
Their worries fell away from them like needles tossed aside.
From the windy pine.
"Lost is that camp, and wasted all its fire;
And who created that spell?—
Ah, tall pine trees and the impressive Kentish steeple,
You have one story to tell!
"Lost is that camp! but let its fragrant story
Mix with the breath that excites
With the scent of hop vines, all the thoughtful beauty
That fills the Kent hills.
"And on that grave where English oak and holly
And laurel wreaths intertwine,
Don't consider it too arrogant or foolish—
This spray of Western pine!
"July, 1870."
CHAPTER XIII.
DEVONSHIRE TERRACE AND BROADSTAIRS.
1840.
It was an excellent saying of the first Lord Shaftesbury, that, seeing every man of any capacity holds within himself two men, the wise and the foolish, each of them ought freely to be allowed his turn; and it was one of the secrets of Dickens's social charm that he could, in strict accordance with this saying, allow each part of him its turn; could afford thoroughly to give rest and relief to what was serious in him, and, when the time came to play his gambols, could surrender himself wholly to the enjoyment of the time, and become the very genius and embodiment of one of his own most whimsical fancies.
It was a great saying from the first Lord Shaftesbury that since every person with any ability has two sides within them—the wise and the foolish—each side should be allowed its moment. One of the secrets to Dickens's social appeal was his ability to let each part of himself have its turn, giving full attention and rest to his serious side, and when it was time to have fun, he could completely embrace the moment and fully embody one of his most whimsical ideas.
Turning back from the narrative of his last piece of[218] writing to recall a few occurrences of the year during which it had occupied him, I find him at its opening in one of these humorous moods, and another friend, with myself, enslaved by its influence. "What on earth does it all mean?" wrote poor puzzled Mr. Landor to me, inclosing a letter from him of the date of the 11th of February, the day after the royal nuptials of that year. In this he had related to our old friend a wonderful hallucination arising out of that event, which had then taken entire possession of him. "Society is unhinged here," thus ran the letter, "by her majesty's marriage, and I am sorry to add that I have fallen hopelessly in love with the Queen, and wander up and down with vague and dismal thoughts of running away to some uninhabited island with a maid of honor, to be entrapped by conspiracy for that purpose. Can you suggest any particular young person, serving in such a capacity, who would suit me? It is too much perhaps to ask you to join the band of noble youths (Forster is in it, and Maclise) who are to assist me in this great enterprise, but a man of your energy would be invaluable. I have my eye upon Lady . . . , principally because she is very beautiful and has no strong brothers. Upon this, and other points of the scheme, however, we will confer more at large when we meet; and meanwhile burn this document, that no suspicion may arise or rumor get abroad."
Turning back from the story of his last piece of[218] writing to recall a few events from the year he was working on it, I find him starting off in one of those humorous moods, with another friend and me caught up in it. "What on earth does it all mean?" wrote the confused Mr. Landor to me, including a letter he wrote on February 11th, the day after the royal wedding that year. In this letter, he shared with our old friend a strange vision he had because of that event, which completely consumed him. "Society is a bit off-kilter here," the letter said, "and I regret to say that I’ve hopelessly fallen in love with the Queen, wandering around with vague and gloomy thoughts of escaping to some deserted island with a lady-in-waiting, where I’d be trapped in a plot to make it happen. Can you suggest any specific young woman in that role who would be a good match for me? It may be too much to ask you to join the group of noble young men (Forster is in it, and Maclise) who are helping me with this grand scheme, but someone with your energy would be incredibly helpful. I have my eye on Lady . . . , mainly because she’s very beautiful and has no strong brothers. However, we can discuss this and other details of the plan more when we meet; in the meantime, please burn this letter so that no one gets suspicious or hears any rumors."
The maid of honor and the uninhabited island were flights of fancy, but the other daring delusion was for a time encouraged to such whimsical lengths, not alone by him, but (under his influence) by the two friends named, that it took the wildest forms of humorous extravagance;[219] and of the private confidences much interchanged, as well as of the style of open speech in which our joke of despairing unfitness for any further use or enjoyment of life was unflaggingly kept up, to the amazement of bystanders knowing nothing of what it meant, and believing we had half lost our senses, I permit myself to give from his letters one further illustration. "I am utterly lost in misery," he writes to me on the 12th of February, "and can do nothing. I have been reading Oliver, Pickwick, and Nickleby to get my thoughts together for the new effort, but all in vain:
The maid of honor and the deserted island were just flights of imagination, but the other daring fantasy was encouraged to such playful extremes—by him and, under his influence, by the two friends mentioned—that it took on the most absurd forms of humor. Our private exchanges, along with the open way we joked about our desperate uselessness and inability to enjoy life, amazed onlookers who had no idea what it all meant and thought we had completely lost our minds. To illustrate this, I'll share one more excerpt from his letters. "I am completely overwhelmed with misery," he wrote to me on February 12th, "and I can't do anything. I've been reading Oliver, Pickwick, and Nickleby to clear my head for the new effort, but it’s all in vain:"
My heart isn't in this;
My heart is in Windsor.
A follower, my dear.
Some ailments which dated from an earlier period in his life made themselves felt in the spring of the year, as I remember, and increased horse-exercise was strongly recommended to him. "I find it will be positively necessary to go, for five days in the week, at least," he wrote to me in March, "on a perfect regimen of diet and exercise, and am anxious therefore not to delay treating for a horse." We were now in consequence, when he was not at the sea-side, much on horseback in suburban lanes and roads; and the spacious garden of his new house was also turned to healthful use at even his busiest times of work. I mark this, too, as the time when the first of his ravens took up residence there; and as the beginning of disputes with two of his neighbors about the smoking of the stable-chimney, which his groom Topping, a highly absurd little man with flaming red hair, so complicated by secret devices of his own, meant to conciliate each complainant alternately and having the effect of aggravating both, that law-proceedings were only barely avoided. "I shall give you," he writes, "my latest report of the chimney in the form of an address from Topping, made to me on our way from little Hall's at Norwood the other night, where he and Chapman and I had been walking all day, while Topping drove Kate, Mrs. Hall, and her sisters, to Dulwich. Topping had been regaled upon the premises, and was just drunk enough to be confidential. 'Beggin' your pardon, sir, but the genelman next door sir, seems to be gettin' quite comfortable and pleasant[221] about the chimley.'—'I don't think he is, Topping.'—'Yes he is sir I think. He comes out in the yard this morning and says, Coachman he says' (observe the vision of a great large fat man called up by the word) is that your raven he says, Coachman? or is it Mr. Dickens's raven? he says. My master's sir, I says. Well, he says, It's a fine bird. I think the chimley 'ill do now Coachman,—now the jint's taken off the pipe he says. I hope it will sir, I says; my master's a genelman as wouldn't annoy no genelman if he could help it, I'm sure; and my missis is so afraid of havin' a bit o' fire that o' Sundays our little bit o' weal or wot not, goes to the baker's a purpose.—Damn the chimley, Coachman, he says, it's a smokin' now.—It ain't a smokin' your way sir, I says; Well he says no more it is, Coachman, and as long as it smokes anybody else's way, it's all right and I'm agreeable.' Of course I shall now have the man from the other side upon me, and very likely with an action of nuisance for smoking into his conservatory."
Some health issues from earlier in his life started bothering him in the spring, as I recall, and he was strongly advised to increase his exercise on horseback. "I realize it’s going to be absolutely necessary for me to ride for at least five days a week," he wrote to me in March, "following a strict diet and exercise routine, and I’m eager not to delay getting a horse.” Because of this, when he wasn't at the seaside, we spent a lot of time riding through suburban lanes and roads; even the large garden of his new house was used for exercise during his busiest work periods. I also note that this was when the first of his ravens made its home there, and arguments began with two neighbors over the smoke from the stable chimney, which his groom Topping, a rather ridiculous little man with bright red hair, complicated further with his own schemes, trying to appease each complainant alternately but managing to irritate both, to the point where legal action was narrowly avoided. "I'll give you," he writes, "my latest update about the chimney in the form of a speech from Topping, made to me while we were walking back from little Hall's at Norwood the other night, where he, Chapman, and I had been walking all day, while Topping drove Kate, Mrs. Hall, and her sisters to Dulwich. Topping had been enjoying some drinks, just tipsy enough to be chatty. 'Excuse me, sir, but the gentleman next door seems to be getting quite comfortable and friendly about the chimney.'—'I don’t think he is, Topping.'—'Yes, I think he is, sir. He came out in the yard this morning and said, Coachman, he said, is that your raven? or is it Mr. Dickens's raven? I said, it’s my master's, sir. Well, he said, it’s a fine bird. I think the chimney will be all right now, Coachman,—now the joint’s been taken off the pipe, he said. I hope it will be, I said; my master is a gentleman who wouldn’t annoy anyone if he could help it, and my missis is so afraid of having a bit of fire that on Sundays our little bit of meat or whatever, goes to the baker's for cooking.—Damn the chimney, Coachman, he said, it's smoking now.—It’s not smoking your way, sir, I said; Well, he said, no more it is, Coachman, and as long as it smokes anyone else’s way, it’s all good and I’m fine with that.' Of course, now I’ll have the man from the other side coming after me, probably with a nuisance lawsuit for smoking into his conservatory."
A graver incident, which occurred to him also among his earliest experiences as tenant of Devonshire Terrace, illustrates too well the always practical turn of his kindness and humanity not to deserve relation here. He has himself described it in one of his minor writings, in setting down what he remembered as the only good that ever came of a beadle. Of that great parish functionary, he says, "having newly taken the lease of a house in a certain distinguished metropolitan parish, a house which then appeared to me to be a frightfully first-class family mansion involving awful responsibilities, I became the prey." In other words, he was[222] summoned, and obliged to sit, as juryman at an inquest on the body of a little child alleged to have been murdered by its mother; of which the result was, that, by his persevering exertion, seconded by the humane help of the coroner, Mr. Wakley, the verdict of himself and his fellow-jurymen charged her only with concealment of the birth. "The poor desolate creature dropped upon her knees before us with protestations that we were right (protestations among the most affecting that I have ever heard in my life), and was carried away insensible. I caused some extra care to be taken of her in the prison, and counsel to be retained for her defense when she was tried at the Old Bailey; and her sentence was lenient, and her history and conduct proved that it was right." How much he felt the little incident, at the actual time of its occurrence, may be judged from the few lines written to me next morning: "Whether it was the poor baby, or its poor mother, or the coffin, or my fellow-jurymen, or what not, I can't say, but last night I had a most violent attack of sickness and indigestion, which not only prevented me from sleeping, but even from lying down. Accordingly Kate and I sat up through the dreary watches."
A more serious incident that happened to him early on as a tenant of Devonshire Terrace illustrates his practical kindness and humanity, deserving mention here. He described it himself in one of his lesser-known writings, recalling it as the only good that ever came from a beadle. Of this significant parish official, he said, "Having just taken the lease of a house in a well-known metropolitan parish, which seemed to me to be an incredibly upscale family mansion with huge responsibilities, I became a victim." In other words, he was summoned and forced to sit as a juror at an inquest on the body of a little child allegedly murdered by its mother. Thanks to his persistent effort, along with the compassionate assistance of the coroner, Mr. Wakley, the verdict from him and his fellow jurors charged her only with concealing the birth. "The poor, desolate woman fell to her knees in front of us, insisting that we were correct (her pleas were among the most touching I have ever heard in my life), and was taken away unconscious. I arranged for extra care for her in prison and made sure she had legal representation when she was tried at the Old Bailey. Her sentence was lenient, and her story and behavior showed that it was the right decision." The intensity of his feelings about this incident at the time can be gauged from a few lines he wrote to me the next morning: "Whether it was the poor baby, its mother, the coffin, my fellow jurors, or something else, I can't say, but last night I had a severe bout of sickness and indigestion, which not only kept me from sleeping but even from lying down. So, Kate and I stayed up during the long hours."
The day of the first publication of Master Humphrey (Saturday, 4th April) had by this time come, and, according to the rule observed in his two other great ventures, he left town with Mrs. Dickens on Friday, the 3d. With Maclise we had been together at Richmond the previous night; and I joined him at Birmingham the day following with news of the sale of the whole sixty thousand copies to which the first working had[223] been limited, and of orders already in hand for ten thousand more! The excitement of the success somewhat lengthened our holiday; and, after visiting Shakspeare's house at Stratford and Johnson's at Lichfield, we found our resources so straitened in returning, that, employing as our messenger of need his younger brother Alfred, who had joined us from Tamworth, where he was a student-engineer, we had to pawn our gold watches at Birmingham.
The day of the first publication of Master Humphrey (Saturday, April 4th) had finally arrived, and, following the pattern he used for his other two major projects, he left town with Mrs. Dickens on Friday, the 3rd. I had been with Maclise at Richmond the night before, and I met up with him in Birmingham the next day to share the news that all sixty thousand copies from the initial print run had sold out, plus we already had orders for another ten thousand! The excitement from this success made our holiday last a bit longer; after visiting Shakespeare's house in Stratford and Johnson's in Lichfield, we found ourselves short on funds for the return trip. We ended up having to use his younger brother Alfred, who had joined us from Tamworth where he was studying engineering, to help us out by pawning our gold watches in Birmingham.
At the end of the following month he went to Broadstairs, and not many days before (on the 20th of May) a note from Mr. Jordan on behalf of Mr. Bentley opened the negotiations formerly referred to,[31] which transferred to Messrs. Chapman & Hall the agreement for Barnaby Rudge. I was myself absent when he left, and in a letter announcing his departure he had written, "I don't know of a word of news in all London, but there will be plenty next week, for I am going away, and I hope you'll send me an account of it. I am doubtful whether it will be a murder, a fire, a vast robbery, or the escape of Gould, but it will be something remarkable no doubt. I almost blame myself for the death of that poor girl who leaped off the monument upon my leaving town last year. She would not have done it if I had remained, neither would the two men have found the skeleton in the sewers." His prediction was quite accurate, for I had to tell him, after not many days, of the potboy who shot at the queen. "It's a great pity," he replied, very sensibly, "they couldn't suffocate that boy, Master Oxford, and say no more[224] about it. To have put him quietly between two feather beds would have stopped his heroic speeches, and dulled the sound of his glory very much. As it is, she will have to run the gauntlet of many a fool and madman, some of whom may perchance be better shots and use other than Brummagem firearms." How much of this actually came to pass, the reader knows.
At the end of the following month, he went to Broadstairs, and just days before (on May 20th), a note from Mr. Jordan on behalf of Mr. Bentley started the discussions mentioned earlier,[31] which transferred the agreement for Barnaby Rudge to Messrs. Chapman & Hall. I was away when he left, and in a letter announcing his departure, he wrote, "I don't know any news from London, but there’ll be plenty next week since I'm leaving, and I hope you'll send me an update. I'm not sure if it will be a murder, a fire, a big robbery, or the escape of Gould, but it will surely be something remarkable. I almost feel responsible for the death of that poor girl who jumped off the monument right after I left town last year. She wouldn't have done it if I had stayed, and the two men wouldn't have found the skeleton in the sewers." His prediction turned out to be quite accurate because I had to inform him, after just a few days, about the potboy who shot at the queen. "It's a real shame," he replied thoughtfully, "that they couldn't just silence that boy, Master Oxford, and leave it at that. Just putting him quietly between two feather beds would have stopped his dramatic speeches and dulled the sound of his glory considerably. As it is, she'll have to deal with many a fool and madman, some of whom might be better shots and use weapons other than cheap firearms." How much of this actually happened, the reader knows.
From the letters of his present Broadstairs visit, there is little further to add to their account of his progress with his story; but a couple more lines may be given for their characteristic expression of his invariable habit upon entering any new abode, whether to stay in it for days or for years. On a Monday night he arrived, and on the Tuesday (2d of June) wrote to me, "Before I tasted bit or drop yesterday, I set out my writing-table with extreme taste and neatness, and improved the disposition of the furniture generally." He stayed till the end of June; when Maclise and myself joined him for the pleasure of posting back home with him and Mrs. Dickens, by way of his favorite Chatham and Rochester and Cobham, where we passed two agreeable days in revisiting well-remembered scenes. I had meanwhile brought to a close the treaty for repurchase of Oliver and surrender of Barnaby, upon terms which are succinctly stated in a letter written by him to Messrs. Chapman & Hall on the 2d of July, the day after our return:
From the letters of his current visit to Broadstairs, there is little more to add about his progress with his story; however, a couple of lines can be shared to highlight his consistent habit when entering any new place, whether he plans to stay for a few days or years. He arrived on a Monday night, and on Tuesday (June 2nd), he wrote to me, "Before I had a bite to eat or a drink yesterday, I arranged my writing desk with great style and neatness, and I reorganized the furniture overall." He stayed until the end of June, when Maclise and I joined him for the enjoyment of traveling back home with him and Mrs. Dickens, taking his favorite route through Chatham, Rochester, and Cobham, where we spent two pleasant days revisiting familiar places. In the meantime, I had finalized the agreement to buy back *Oliver* and hand over *Barnaby*, on terms that are summarized in a letter he wrote to Messrs. Chapman & Hall on July 2nd, the day after our return:
"The terms upon which you advance the money to-day for the purchase of the copyright and stock[32] of[225] Oliver on my behalf are understood between us to be these. That this 2250l. is to be deducted from the purchase-money of a work by me entitled Barnaby Rudge, of which two chapters are now in your hands, and of which the whole is to be written within some convenient time to be agreed upon between us. But if it should not be written (which God forbid!) within five years, you are to have a lien to this amount on the property belonging to me that is now in your hands, namely, my shares in the stock and copyright of Sketches by Boz, The Pickwick Papers, Nicholas Nickleby, Oliver Twist, and Master Humphrey's Clock; in which we do not include any share of the current profits of the last-named work, which I shall remain at liberty to draw at the times stated in our agreement. Your purchase of Barnaby Rudge is made upon the following terms. It is to consist of matter sufficient for ten monthly numbers of the size of Pickwick and Nickleby, which you are, however, at liberty to divide and publish in fifteen smaller numbers if you think fit. The terms for the purchase of this edition in numbers, and for the copyright of the whole book for six months after the publication of the last number, are 3000l. At the expiration of the six months the whole copyright reverts to me." The sequel was, as all the world knows, that Barnaby became successor to Little Nell, the money being repaid by the profits of the Clock; but I ought to mention also the more generous sequel[226] that my own small service had, on my receiving from him, after not many days, an antique silver-mounted jug of great beauty of form and workmanship, but with a wealth far beyond jeweler's chasing or artist's design in the written words that accompanied it.[33] I accepted them to commemorate, not the help they would have far overpaid, but the gladness of his own escape from the last of the agreements that had hampered the opening of his career, and the better future that was now before him.
"The terms on which you are lending me money today for the purchase of the copyright and stock[32] of[225] Oliver are understood between us as follows. The £2250 is to be deducted from the purchase price of a work I’m writing called Barnaby Rudge, two chapters of which you currently have, and the entire work will be completed within a reasonable timeframe that we will agree on. However, if it isn’t finished (which I hope won’t happen!) within five years, you will have a lien on this amount against my property that you currently hold, which includes my shares in the stock and copyright of Sketches by Boz, The Pickwick Papers, Nicholas Nickleby, Oliver Twist, and Master Humphrey's Clock; this does not include any share of the current profits from the last-named work, which I will still be allowed to draw from as specified in our agreement. Your purchase of Barnaby Rudge will be based on the following terms. It should consist of enough material for ten monthly installments the size of Pickwick and Nickleby, which you can choose to split and publish in fifteen smaller installments if you prefer. The purchase price for this edition in installments, along with the copyright for the entire book for six months after the last installment is published, is £3000. After the six months, the full copyright will revert to me." The follow-up was, as everyone knows, that Barnaby succeeded Little Nell, with the money being repaid through the profits of the Clock; but I should also mention the more generous afterthought[226] that my small effort had, when I received from him, after just a few days, a beautiful antique silver-mounted jug of exquisite form and craftsmanship, but with a value that surpassed any jeweler's work or artist's design, found in the words he wrote that accompanied it.[33] I accepted them as a way to remember, not the help they would have well overcompensated, but the joy of his own release from the last agreements that had held back his career, and the brighter future that now lay ahead of him.
At the opening of August he was with Mrs. Dickens for some days in Devonshire, on a visit to his father, but he had to take his work with him; and, as he wrote to me, they had only one real holiday, when Dawlish, Teignmouth, Babbicombe, and Torquay were explored, returning to Exeter at night. In the beginning of September he was again at Broadstairs.
At the start of August, he spent a few days with Mrs. Dickens in Devonshire, visiting his father, but he had to bring his work along. As he mentioned to me, they only had one actual holiday, during which they explored Dawlish, Teignmouth, Babbicombe, and Torquay, returning to Exeter at night. In early September, he was back at Broadstairs.
"I was just going to work," he wrote on the 9th, "when I got this letter, and the story of the man who[227] went to Chapman & Hall's knocked me down flat. I wrote until now (a quarter to one) against the grain, and have at last given it up for one day. Upon my word it is intolerable. I have been grinding my teeth all the morning. I think I could say in two lines something about the general report with propriety. I'll add them to the proof" (the preface to the first volume of the Clock was at this time in preparation), "giving you full power to cut them out if you should think differently from me, and from C. and H., who in such a matter must be admitted judges." He refers here to a report, rather extensively circulated at the time, and which through various channels had reached his publishers, that he was suffering from loss of reason and was under treatment in an asylum.[34] I would have withheld from him the mention of it, as an absurdity that must quickly pass away, but against my wish it had been communicated to him, and I had difficulty in keeping within judicious bounds his extreme and very natural wrath.
"I was just heading to work," he wrote on the 9th, "when I got this letter, and the story about the guy who went to Chapman & Hall completely flattened me. I wrote until now (a quarter to one) against my better judgment, and I've finally decided to quit for the day. Honestly, it’s unbearable. I’ve been grinding my teeth all morning. I think I could sum up the general report properly in two lines. I'll add them to the proof" (the preface to the first volume of the Clock was being prepared at this time), "giving you full permission to cut them out if you disagree with me and with C. and H., who must be considered the judges in this matter." He refers here to a widely circulated report at the time, which had reached his publishers through various channels, claiming that he was losing his mind and was receiving treatment in an asylum. I would have preferred not to mention it to him, considering it an absurdity that would soon fade away, but despite my wishes, it had been communicated to him, and I struggled to keep his extreme and completely understandable anger within reasonable limits.
A few days later (the 15th) he wrote, "I have been rather surprised of late to have applications from[228] Roman Catholic clergymen, demanding (rather pastorally, and with a kind of grave authority) assistance, literary employment, and so forth. At length it struck me that, through some channel or other, I must have been represented as belonging to that religion. Would you believe that in a letter from Lamert, at Cork, to my mother, which I saw last night, he says, 'What do the papers mean by saying that Charles is demented, and, further, that he has turned Roman Catholic?'—!" Of the begging-letter-writers, hinted at here, I ought earlier to have said something. In one of his detached essays he has described, without a particle of exaggeration, the extent to which he was made a victim by this class of swindler, and the extravagance of the devices practiced on him; but he has not confessed, as he might, that for much of what he suffered he was himself responsible, by giving so largely, as at first he did, to almost every one who applied to him. What at last brought him to his senses in this respect, I think, was the request made by the adventurer who had exhausted every other expedient, and who desired finally, after describing himself reduced to the condition of a traveling Cheap Jack in the smallest way of crockery, that a donkey might be left out for him next day, which he would duly call for. This I perfectly remember, and I much fear that the applicant was the Daniel Tobin before mentioned.[35]
A few days later (the 15th) he wrote, "I've been pretty surprised lately to receive requests from[228] Roman Catholic priests, asking (in a sort of pastoral way, with a certain serious authority) for help, job opportunities, and so on. It finally struck me that, somehow, I must have been portrayed as being part of that religion. Can you believe that in a letter from Lamert in Cork to my mom, which I saw last night, he says, 'What do the newspapers mean by claiming that Charles is out of his mind, and, additionally, that he has converted to Roman Catholicism?'—!" I should have said something earlier about the people who write begging letters that I hinted at here. In one of his separate essays, he described, without a hint of exaggeration, how much he was taken advantage of by this type of con artist and the ridiculous schemes that were pulled on him; however, he hasn’t admitted, as he could have, that he was partly to blame for much of what he went through because he gave generously to almost everyone who reached out to him at first. What eventually opened his eyes to this, I think, was a request from a scammer who had run out of all other options and who finally, after describing how he had been reduced to a traveling cheap vendor with just a few pieces of pottery, wanted a donkey to be left out for him the next day, which he would come to collect. I remember this clearly, and I fear that the person asking was the Daniel Tobin I mentioned earlier.[35]
Many and delightful were other letters written from Broadstairs at this date, filled with whimsical talk and humorous description relating chiefly to an eccentric[229] friend who stayed with him most of the time, and is sketched in one of his published papers as Mr. Kindheart; but all too private for reproduction now. He returned in the middle of October, when we resumed our almost daily ridings, foregatherings with Maclise at Hampstead and elsewhere, and social entertainments with Macready, Talfourd, Procter, Stanfield, Fonblanque, Elliotson, Tennent, D'Orsay, Quin, Harness, Wilkie, Edwin Landseer, Rogers, Sydney Smith, and Bulwer. Of the genius of the author of Pelham and Eugene Aram he had, early and late, the highest admiration, and he took occasion to express it during the present year in a new preface which he published to Oliver Twist. Other friends became familiar in later years; but, disinclined as he was to the dinner-invitations that reached him from every quarter, all such meetings with those whom I have named, and in an especial manner the marked attentions shown him by Miss Coutts which began with the very beginning of his career, were invariably welcome.
There were many charming letters written from Broadstairs during this time, filled with quirky conversations and funny descriptions, mainly about an eccentric[229] friend who spent most of his time there, described in one of his published papers as Mr. Kindheart; but they're too private to share now. He returned in mid-October, and we started up our almost daily rides, meet-ups with Maclise at Hampstead and elsewhere, and social gatherings with Macready, Talfourd, Procter, Stanfield, Fonblanque, Elliotson, Tennent, D'Orsay, Quin, Harness, Wilkie, Edwin Landseer, Rogers, Sydney Smith, and Bulwer. He had, from the beginning to the end, the highest admiration for the genius of the author of Pelham and Eugene Aram, and he expressed this admiration during the current year in a new preface he published for Oliver Twist. Other friends became more familiar in later years; however, since he was not keen on the dinner invitations he received from every direction, all the gatherings with those I’ve mentioned, especially the special attention he received from Miss Coutts that began early in his career, were always welcome.
To speak here of the pleasure his society afforded, would anticipate the fitter mention to be made hereafter. But what in this respect distinguishes nearly all original men, he possessed eminently. His place was not to be filled up by any other. To the most trivial talk he gave the attraction of his own character. It might be a small matter,—something he had read or observed during the day, some quaint odd fancy from a book, a vivid little out-door picture, the laughing exposure of some imposture, or a burst of sheer mirthful enjoyment,—but of its kind it would be something unique, because genuinely part of himself. This, and[230] his unwearying animal spirits, made him the most delightful of companions; no claim on good-fellowship ever found him wanting; and no one so constantly recalled to his friends the description Johnson gave of Garrick, as the cheerfulest man of his age.
To talk about the enjoyment his company provided would be better saved for later. But what sets apart almost all original thinkers, he had in abundance. No one could take his place. Even the most trivial conversations took on the appeal of his unique character. It could be something minor—something he had read or noticed that day, a quirky idea from a book, a vivid scene from outside, a playful reveal of some deception, or a burst of genuine laughter—whatever it was, it would be special because it was truly a part of him. This, along with his boundless energy, made him the most enjoyable companion; he never fell short in being friendly; and no one reminded his friends more of Johnson's description of Garrick as the happiest man of his time.
Of what occupied him in the way of literary labor in the autumn and winter months of the year, some description has been given; and, apart from what has already thus been said of his work at the closing chapters of The Old Curiosity Shop, nothing now calls for more special allusion, except that in his town-walks in November, impelled thereto by specimens recently discovered in his country-walks between Broadstairs and Ramsgate, he thoroughly explored the ballad literature of Seven-Dials, and took to singing himself, with an effect that justified his reputation for comic singing in his childhood, not a few of these wonderful productions. His last successful labor of the year was the reconciliation of two friends; and his motive, as well as the principle that guided him, as they are described by himself, I think worth preserving. For the first: "In the midst of this child's death, I, over whom something of the bitterness of death has passed, not lightly perhaps, was reminded of many old kindnesses, and was sorry in my heart that men who really liked each other should waste life at arm's length." For the last: "I have laid it down as a rule in my judgment of men, to observe narrowly whether some (of whom one is disposed to think badly) don't carry all their faults upon the surface, and others (of whom one is disposed to think well) don't carry many more beneath it. I have long ago made sure that our friend is in the first[231] class; and when I know all the foibles a man has, with little trouble in the discovery, I begin to think he is worth liking." His latest letter of the year, dated the day following, closed with the hope that we might, he and I, enjoy together "fifty more Christmases, at least, in this world, and eternal summers in another." Alas!
Some description has been given of what filled his time with literary work in the autumn and winter months of the year; aside from what has already been mentioned about his effort on the final chapters of The Old Curiosity Shop, nothing needs to be emphasized further, except that during his town walks in November, motivated by finds from his country walks between Broadstairs and Ramsgate, he thoroughly explored the ballad literature of Seven Dials and started singing himself, in a way that justified his reputation for comic singing in childhood, not a few of these amazing pieces. His last successful task of the year was reconciling two friends; and the reasons behind it, along with the principles that guided him, as he described them, are worth noting. For the first: "In the midst of this child's death, I, who have experienced some of the bitterness of death, not lightly perhaps, was reminded of many old kindnesses, and was genuinely sorry that men who truly liked each other should waste their lives apart." For the last: "I have made it a rule in judging people to closely observe whether some (whom one might think poorly of) don't show all their faults on the surface, while others (whom one might think highly of) hide many more beneath it. I figured out long ago that our friend is in the first class; and when I know all a man's quirks, which isn't hard to discover, I start to think he's worth liking." His last letter of the year, dated the next day, ended with the hope that he and I could enjoy "fifty more Christmases, at least, in this world, and eternal summers in another." Alas!
CHAPTER XIV.
BARNABY RUDGE.
1841.
The letters of 1841 yield similar fruit as to his doings and sayings, and may in like manner first be consulted for the literary work he had in hand.
The letters from 1841 provide similar insights into his actions and words, and can similarly be referenced first for the literary project he was working on.
He had the advantage of beginning Barnaby Rudge with a fair amount of story in advance, which he had only to make suitable, by occasional readjustment of chapters, to publication in weekly portions; and on this he was engaged before the end of January. "I am at present" (22d January, 1841) "in what Leigh Hunt would call a kind of impossible state,—thinking what on earth Master Humphrey can think of through four mortal pages. I added, here and there, to the last chapter of the Curiosity Shop yesterday, and it leaves me only four pages to write." (They were filled by a[233] paper from Humphrey introductory of the new tale, in which will be found a striking picture of London from midnight to the break of day.) "I also made up, and wrote the needful insertions for, the second number of Barnaby,—so that I came back to the mill a little." Hardly yet; for after four days he writes, having meanwhile done nothing, "I have been looking (three o'clock) with an appearance of extraordinary interest and study at one leaf of the Curiosities of Literature ever since half-past ten this morning—I haven't the heart to turn over." Then on Friday the 29th better news came. "I didn't stir out yesterday, but sat and thought all day; not writing a line; not so much as the cross of a t or dot of an i. I imaged forth a good deal of Barnaby by keeping my mind steadily upon him; and am happy to say I have gone to work this morning in good twig, strong hope, and cheerful spirits. Last night I was unutterably and impossible-to-form-an-idea-of-ably miserable. . . . By-the-by, don't engage yourself otherwise than to me for Sunday week, because it's my birthday. I have no doubt we shall have got over our troubles here by that time, and I purpose having a snug dinner in the study." We had the dinner, though the troubles were not over; but the next day another son was born to him. "Thank God," he wrote on the 9th, "quite well. I am thinking hard, and have just written to Browne inquiring when he will come and confer about the raven." He had by this time resolved to make that bird, whose accomplishments had been daily ripening and enlarging for the last twelve months to the increasing mirth and delight of all of us, a prominent figure in Barnaby; and the invitation to[234] the artist was for a conference how best to introduce him graphically.
He started Barnaby Rudge with a good amount of story already prepared, which he just needed to adjust by occasionally rearranging chapters for weekly publication. He was working on this before the end of January. "Right now" (22nd January, 1841), "I’m in what Leigh Hunt would call an impossible state—wondering what on earth Master Humphrey can think about for four entire pages. Yesterday, I added a few things to the last chapter of the Curiosity Shop, and now I only have four pages left to write." (Those pages were filled by a[233] piece from Humphrey introducing the new story, which includes a vivid picture of London from midnight to dawn.) "I also put together the necessary content for the second issue of Barnaby, so I’ve returned to the grind a bit." Not quite yet; because after four days, he wrote, having done nothing in the meantime, "I’ve been staring (at three o'clock) with an intense interest at one leaf of the Curiosities of Literature since half-past ten this morning—I just can’t bring myself to turn the page." Then on Friday the 29th, better news arrived. "I didn’t go out yesterday; I just sat and thought all day, not writing a single line; not a cross of a t or a dot of an i. I visualized a lot of Barnaby by focusing my thoughts on it, and I’m happy to say I started working this morning feeling good, with strong hope and a cheerful spirit. Last night, I was unbelievably miserable and couldn't even begin to express it. By the way, don’t make any other plans besides meeting me for Sunday week because it’s my birthday. I’m sure we’ll have resolved our issues by then, and I plan to have a cozy dinner in the study." We had the dinner, even though our troubles weren’t over; but the next day, another son was born. "Thank God," he wrote on the 9th, "he’s doing well. I’m deep in thought and just wrote to Browne asking when he’ll come to discuss the raven." By this point, he had decided to make that bird, whose skills had been developing and growing over the past year to everyone’s increasing joy, a central character in Barnaby; and the invitation to[234] the artist was for a meeting to figure out how best to introduce him visually.
The next letter mentioning Barnaby was from Brighton (25th February), whither he had flown for a week's quiet labor: "I have (it's four o'clock) done a very fair morning's work, at which I have sat very close, and been blessed besides with a clear view of the end of the volume. As the contents of one number usually require a day's thought at the very least, and often more, this puts me in great spirits. I think—that is, I hope—the story takes a great stride at this point, and takes it well. Nous verrons. Grip will be strong, and I build greatly on the Varden household."
The next letter mentioning Barnaby was from Brighton (February 25th), where he had gone for a week of focused work: "I have (it's four o'clock) done a pretty solid morning's work, sitting tight and also enjoying a clear view of the end of the volume. Since the contents of one section usually require at least a day's thought, and often more, this puts me in really good spirits. I think—I hope—the story makes a significant leap at this point, and does it good. We'll see. Grip will be strong, and I have high hopes for the Varden household."
Upon his return he had to lament a domestic calamity, which, for its connection with that famous personage in Barnaby, must be mentioned here. The raven had for some days been ailing, and Topping had reported of him, as Shakspeare of Hamlet, that he had lost his mirth and foregone all customary exercises; but Dickens paid no great heed, remembering his recovery from an illness of the previous summer when he swallowed some white paint; so that the graver report which led him to send for the doctor came upon him unexpectedly, and nothing but his own language can worthily describe the result. Unable from the state of his feelings to write two letters, he sent the narrative to Maclise, under an enormous black seal, for transmission to me; and thus it befell that this fortunate bird receives a double passport to fame, so great a humorist having celebrated his farewell to the present world, and so great a painter his welcome to another.
Upon his return, he had to mourn a family disaster, which, because of its link to that famous character in Barnaby, needs to be mentioned here. The raven had been unwell for a few days, and Topping had reported on him, like Shakespeare did with Hamlet, saying he had lost his joy and stopped doing all his usual activities; but Dickens didn't think much of it, remembering how the raven recovered from an illness the previous summer when he swallowed some white paint. So, the more serious report that led him to call for the doctor came as a surprise, and only his own words can truly capture the result. Unable to write two letters because of his emotions, he sent the story to Maclise, sealed with a huge black seal, to pass on to me; and so it happened that this lucky bird gained two passes to fame, as such a great humorist marked his farewell to this world, and such a great painter welcomed him to another.
"You will be greatly shocked" (the letter is dated[235] Friday evening, March 12, 1841) "and grieved to hear that the Raven is no more. He expired to-day at a few minutes after twelve o'clock at noon. He had been ailing for a few days, but we anticipated no serious result, conjecturing that a portion of the white paint he swallowed last summer might be lingering about his vitals without having any serious effect upon his constitution. Yesterday afternoon he was taken so much worse that I sent an express for the medical gentleman (Mr. Herring), who promptly attended, and administered a powerful dose of castor oil. Under the influence of this medicine, he recovered so far as to be able at eight o'clock p.m. to bite Topping. His night was peaceful. This morning at daybreak he appeared better; received (agreeably to the doctor's directions) another dose of castor oil; and partook plentifully of some warm gruel, the flavor of which he appeared to relish. Towards eleven o'clock he was so much worse that it was found necessary to muffle the stable-knocker. At half-past, or thereabouts, he was heard talking to himself about the horse and Topping's family, and to add some incoherent expressions which are supposed to have been either a foreboding of his approaching dissolution, or some wishes relative to the disposal of his little property: consisting chiefly of half-pence which he had buried in different parts of the garden. On the clock striking twelve he appeared slightly agitated, but he soon recovered, walked twice or thrice along the coach-house, stopped to bark, staggered, exclaimed Halloa old girl! (his favorite expression), and died.
"You will be very shocked" (the letter is dated[235] Friday evening, March 12, 1841) "and saddened to hear that the Raven is no more. He passed away today just after twelve o'clock noon. He had been unwell for a few days, but we didn't expect anything serious, thinking that some of the white paint he swallowed last summer might still be affecting him without causing major issues. Yesterday afternoon, his condition worsened so much that I sent for the doctor (Mr. Herring), who came quickly and gave him a strong dose of castor oil. After taking this medicine, he felt better enough to bite Topping at eight o'clock p.m.. He had a peaceful night. This morning at daybreak, he seemed better; he took (as per the doctor's advice) another dose of castor oil and enjoyed some warm gruel, which he seemed to like. By around eleven o'clock, he got much worse, and we had to muffle the stable knocker. At about half past, he was heard talking to himself about the horse and Topping's family, adding some jumbled phrases that might have been predictions of his near death or comments about how to manage his little possessions: mostly half-pennies he had buried in different spots in the garden. When the clock struck twelve, he seemed a bit restless but soon regained himself, walked back and forth around the coach-house, paused to bark, swayed, shouted Halloa old girl! (his favorite saying), and then died.
"He behaved throughout with a decent fortitude,[236] equanimity, and self-possession, which cannot be too much admired. I deeply regret that being in ignorance of his danger I did not attend to receive his last instructions. Something remarkable about his eyes occasioned Topping to run for the doctor at twelve. When they returned together our friend was gone. It was the medical gentleman who informed me of his decease. He did it with great caution and delicacy, preparing me by the remark that 'a jolly queer start had taken place;' but the shock was very great notwithstanding. I am not wholly free from suspicions of poison. A malicious butcher has been heard to say that he would 'do' for him: his plea was that he would not be molested in taking orders down the mews, by any bird that wore a tail. Other persons have also been heard to threaten: among others, Charles Knight, who has just started a weekly publication price fourpence: Barnaby being, as you know, threepence. I have directed a post-mortem examination, and the body has been removed to Mr. Herring's school of anatomy for that purpose.
"He handled everything with impressive bravery,[236] calmness, and composure, which is truly admirable. I deeply regret that, unaware of his danger, I missed the chance to hear his final instructions. There was something unusual about his eyes that made Topping run to get the doctor at twelve. When they came back together, our friend was gone. It was the doctor who told me he had passed away. He approached the news with great care and sensitivity, starting by saying that 'a really strange event had occurred;' but the shock was still immense. I can’t shake off the suspicion of poison. A vindictive butcher was heard saying he would 'take care of him:' he claimed he didn’t want to be bothered while taking orders down the mews by any creature that had a tail. Other people have also been heard making threats, including Charles Knight, who just launched a weekly publication costing fourpence: Barnaby is, as you know, threepence. I've arranged for a post-mortem examination, and the body has been sent to Mr. Herring's school of anatomy for that purpose."
"I could wish, if you can take the trouble, that you could inclose this to Forster immediately after you have read it. I cannot discharge the painful task of communication more than once. Were they ravens who took manna to somebody in the wilderness? At times I hope they were, and at others I fear they were not, or they would certainly have stolen it by the way. In profound sorrow, I am ever your bereaved friend C. D. Kate is as well as can be expected, but terribly low, as you may suppose. The children seem rather glad of it. He bit their ankles. But that was play."[237]
"I would appreciate it if you could send this to Forster right after you read it. I can't go through the painful task of communication more than once. Were those ravens who brought manna to someone in the wilderness? Sometimes I hope they were, and other times I fear they weren't, or they would have definitely taken it along the way. With deep sadness, I remain your grieving friend, C. D. Kate is doing as well as can be expected but is terribly down, as you might guess. The kids seem to be somewhat happy about it. He bit their ankles, but that was just play." [237]

Maclise's covering letter was an apotheosis, to be rendered only in fac-simile.
Maclise's cover letter was a masterpiece, meant to be reproduced exactly.
In what way the loss was replaced, so that Barnaby should have the fruit of continued study of the habits of the family of birds which Grip had so nobly represented, Dickens has told in the preface to the story; and another, older, and larger Grip, obtained through Mr. Smithson, was installed in the stable, almost before the stuffed remains of his honored predecessor had been sent home in a glass case, by way of ornament to his master's study.
In what way the loss was made up for, so that Barnaby would benefit from the ongoing study of the habits of the bird family that Grip had so bravely represented, Dickens shared in the story's preface; and another, older, and larger Grip, acquired through Mr. Smithson, was set up in the stable almost before the preserved remains of his esteemed predecessor had been returned home in a glass case, intended as decoration for his master's study.
I resume our correspondence on what he was writing: "I see there is yet room for a few lines" (25th March), "and you are quite right in wishing what I cut out to be restored. I did not want Joe to be so short about Dolly, and really wrote his references to that young lady carefully,—as natural things with a meaning in them. Chigwell, my dear fellow, is the greatest place in the world. Name your day for going. Such a delicious old inn opposite the churchyard,—such a lovely ride,—such beautiful forest scenery,—such an out-of-the-way, rural place,—such a sexton! I say again, name your day." The day was named at once; and the whitest of stones marks it, in now sorrowful memory. His promise was exceeded by our enjoyment; and his delight in the double recognition, of himself and of Barnaby, by the landlord of the nice old inn, far exceeded any pride he would have taken in what the world thinks the highest sort of honor.
I’m picking up our conversation about what he was writing: "I see there’s still space for a few more lines" (25th March), "and you’re totally right to want what I cut out to be put back. I didn’t mean for Joe to be so brief about Dolly, and I really wrote his mentions of that young lady thoughtfully—as natural things with meaning behind them. Chigwell, my dear friend, is the best place in the world. Just tell me when you want to go. There’s such a charming old inn across from the churchyard—such a lovely ride—such beautiful forest scenery—such a hidden, rural spot—such a sexton! I say again, tell me when." The date was set right away; and the whitest stone marks it, now with a heavy heart. His promise was surpassed by our enjoyment; and his joy at being recognized, along with Barnaby, by the owner of the nice old inn, far outweighed any pride he would have felt from what the world sees as the highest kind of honor.
"I have shut myself up" (26th March) "by myself to-day, and mean to try and 'go it' at the Clock; Kate being out, and the house peacefully dismal. I don't[240] remember altering the exact part you object to, but if there be anything here you object to, knock it out ruthlessly." "Don't fail" (April the 5th) "to erase anything that seems to you too strong. It is difficult for me to judge what tells too much, and what does not. I am trying a very quiet number to set against this necessary one. I hope it will be good, but I am in very sad condition for work. Glad you think this powerful. What I have put in is more relief, from the raven." Two days later: "I have done that number, and am now going to work on another. I am bent (please Heaven) on finishing the first chapter by Friday night. I hope to look in upon you to-night, when we'll dispose of the toasts for Saturday. Still bilious—but a good number, I hope, notwithstanding. Jeffrey has come to town, and was here yesterday." The toasts to be disposed of were those to be given at the dinner on the 10th to celebrate the second volume of Master Humphrey: when Talfourd presided, when there was much jollity, and, according to the memorandum drawn up that Saturday night now lying before me, we all in the greatest good humor glorified each other: Talfourd proposing the Clock, Macready Mrs. Dickens, Dickens the publishers, and myself the artists; Macready giving Talfourd, Talfourd Macready, Dickens myself, and myself the comedian Mr. Harley, whose humorous songs had been the not least considerable element in the mirth of the evening.
"I've locked myself away" (March 26th) "today, and I'm planning to work on the Clock; Kate is out, and the house is peacefully gloomy. I don't[240] recall changing the specific part you have an issue with, but if there's anything here that bothers you, feel free to cut it out without mercy." "Make sure" (April 5th) "to remove anything that seems too intense to you. It's hard for me to tell what is too much and what isn't. I'm working on a very subtle piece to balance out this necessary one. I hope it turns out well, but I'm not in great shape for working. I'm glad you think this is powerful. What I've included is more of a relief from the darkness." Two days later: "I've finished that piece and am now starting on another. I’m determined (God willing) to complete the first chapter by Friday night. I hope to drop by to see you tonight, so we can sort out the toasts for Saturday. Still feeling a bit off—but I hope it will be a good piece regardless. Jeffrey has come to town and was here yesterday." The toasts we need to sort were for the dinner on the 10th to celebrate the second volume of Master Humphrey: Talfourd presided, and there was plenty of joy, and according to the notes from that Saturday night now in front of me, we all, in great spirits, praised one another: Talfourd proposed the Clock, Macready proposed Mrs. Dickens, Dickens proposed the publishers, and I proposed the artists; Macready toasted Talfourd, Talfourd toasted Macready, Dickens toasted me, and I toasted the comedian Mr. Harley, whose funny songs were a big part of the evening's laughter.
Five days later he writes, "I finished the number yesterday, and, although I dined with Jeffrey, and was obliged to go to Lord Denman's afterwards (which made me late), have done eight slips of the[241] Lamplighter for Mrs. Macrone, this morning. When I have got that off my mind, I shall try to go on steadily, fetching up the Clock lee-way." The Lamplighter was his old farce,[36] which he now turned into a comic tale; and this, with other contributions given him by friends and edited by him as Pic Nic Papers, enabled him to help the widow of his old publisher in her straitened means by a gift of £300. He had finished his work of charity before he next wrote of Barnaby Rudge, but he was fetching up his lee-way lazily. "I am getting on" (29th of April) "very slowly. I want to stick to the story; and the fear of committing myself, because of the impossibility of trying back or altering a syllable, makes it much harder than it looks. It was too bad of me to give you the trouble of cutting the number, but I knew so well you would do it in the right places. For what Harley would call the 'onward work' I really think I have some famous thoughts." There is an interval of a month before the next allusion: "Solomon's expression" (3d of June) "I meant to be one of those strong ones to which strong circumstances give birth in the commonest minds. Deal with it as you like. . . . Say what you please of Gordon" (I had objected to some points in his view of this madman, stated much too favorably as I thought), "he must have been at heart a kind man, and a lover of the despised and rejected, after his own fashion. He lived upon a small income, and always within it; was known to relieve the necessities of many people; exposed in his place the corrupt attempt of a minister to buy him[242] out of Parliament; and did great charities in Newgate. He always spoke on the people's side, and tried against his muddled brains to expose the profligacy of both parties. He never got anything by his madness, and never sought it. The wildest and most raging attacks of the time allow him these merits: and not to let him have 'em in their full extent, remembering in what a (politically) wicked time he lived, would lie upon my conscience heavily. The libel he was imprisoned for when he died, was on the Queen of France; and the French government interested themselves warmly to procure his release,—which I think they might have done, but for Lord Grenville." I was more successful in the counsel I gave against a fancy he had at this part of the story, that he would introduce as actors in the Gordon riots three splendid fellows who should order, lead, control, and be obeyed as natural guides of the crowd in that delirious time, and who should turn out, when all was over, to have broken out from Bedlam; but, though he saw the unsoundness of this, he could not so readily see, in Gordon's case, the danger of taxing ingenuity to ascribe a reasonable motive to acts of sheer insanity. The feeblest parts of the book are those in which Lord George and his secretary appear.
Five days later he writes, "I finished the number yesterday, and even though I had dinner with Jeffrey and had to go to Lord Denman's afterward (which made me late), I managed to get eight slips of the[241] Lamplighter done for Mrs. Macrone this morning. Once I get that off my mind, I’ll try to keep moving forward, catching up on the Clock backlog." The Lamplighter was his old farce,[36] which he now turned into a comic story; and this, along with other contributions from friends that he edited as Pic Nic Papers, allowed him to assist the widow of his old publisher with a gift of £300. He completed his charitable work before he next mentioned Barnaby Rudge, but he was lazily catching up on his backlog. "I’m making progress" (April 29th) "very slowly. I want to stick to the story, and the fear of locking myself in because I can’t go back or change a word makes it much harder than it seems. I apologize for putting you through the trouble of cutting the number, but I knew you would do it in all the right places. For what Harley would call the 'onward work,' I really think I have some brilliant ideas." There's a month’s break before the next reference: "Solomon's expression" (June 3rd) "I intended to be one of those strong ideas that strong circumstances bring out in ordinary minds. Handle it however you want. . . . Say what you will about Gordon" (I had raised concerns about some aspects of his portrayal of this madman, which I thought was overly positive), "he must have been at heart a kind person, someone who cared for the despised and rejected in his own way. He lived on a modest income and always managed to live within it; he was known to help many people in need; he exposed the corrupt scheme of a minister trying to buy him[242] out of Parliament; and did great charitable work in Newgate. He always spoke for the people and tried, despite his confused thoughts, to highlight the corruption of both parties. He never gained anything from his madness and never sought it. Even the wildest and most furious critiques of the time acknowledge these merits: to overlook them entirely, considering the (politically) wicked era he lived in, would weigh heavily on my conscience. The libel he was imprisoned for when he died was against the Queen of France; and the French government took a strong interest in getting him released—which I believe they could have done if not for Lord Grenville." I was more effective in advising against a notion he had at this part of the story, where he wanted to introduce three remarkable characters who would guide, lead, and command respect as natural leaders of the crowd during that chaotic time, only to reveal afterward that they had escaped from Bedlam. Although he recognized the flaw in this, he couldn't easily grasp, in Gordon’s situation, the risk of trying to find a logical motive behind acts of outright insanity. The weakest parts of the book are where Lord George and his secretary appear.
He left for Scotland after the middle of June, but he took work with him. "You may suppose," he wrote from Edinburgh on the 30th, "I have not done much work; but by Friday night's post from here I hope to send the first long chapter of a number and both the illustrations; from Loch Earn on Tuesday night, the closing chapter of that number; from the same place[243] on Thursday night, the first long chapter of another, with both the illustrations; and, from some place which no man ever spelt but which sounds like Ballyhoolish, on Saturday, the closing chapter of that number, which will leave us all safe till I return to town." Nine days later he wrote from "Ballechelish," "I have done all I can or need do in the way of Barnaby until I come home, and the story is progressing (I hope you will think) to good strong interest. I have left it, I think, at an exciting point, with a good dawning of the riots. In the first of the two numbers I have written since I have been away, I forget whether the blind man, in speaking to Barnaby about riches, tells him they are to be found in crowds. If I have not actually used that word, will you introduce it? A perusal of the proof of the following number (70) will show you how, and why." "Have you," he wrote shortly after his return (29th July), "seen No. 71? I thought there was a good glimpse of a crowd, from a window—eh?" He had now taken thoroughly to the interest of his closing chapters, and felt more than ever the constraints of his form of publication. "I am warming up very much" (on the 5th August from Broadstairs) "about Barnaby. Oh! if I only had him, from this time to the end, in monthly numbers. N'importe! I hope the interest will be pretty strong,—and, in every number, stronger." Six days later, from the same place: "I was always sure I could make a good thing of Barnaby, and I think you'll find that it comes out strong to the last word. I have another number ready, all but two slips. Don't fear for young Chester. The time hasn't come——there we go again, you see, with the weekly delays. I am in[244] great heart and spirits with the story, and with the prospect of having time to think before I go on again." A month's interval followed, and what occupied it will be described shortly. On the 11th September he wrote, "I have just burnt into Newgate, and am going in the next number to tear the prisoners out by the hair of their heads. The number which gets into the jail you'll have in proof by Tuesday." This was followed up a week later: "I have let all the prisoners out of Newgate, burnt down Lord Mansfield's, and played the very devil. Another number will finish the fires, and help us on towards the end. I feel quite smoky when I am at work. I want elbow-room terribly." To this trouble, graver supervened at his return, a serious personal sickness not the least; but he bore up gallantly, and I had never better occasion than now to observe his quiet endurance of pain, how little he thought of himself where the sense of self is commonly supreme, and the manful duty with which everything was done that, ailing as he was, he felt it necessary to do. He was still in his sick-room (22d October) when he wrote, "I hope I sha'n't leave off any more, now, until I have finished Barnaby." Three days after that, he was busying himself eagerly for others; and on the 2d of November the printers received the close of Barnaby Rudge.
He left for Scotland after mid-June, but he took work with him. "You might think," he wrote from Edinburgh on the 30th, "that I haven't done much work; but by Friday night's post from here, I hope to send the first long chapter of a number and both illustrations; from Loch Earn on Tuesday night, the closing chapter of that number; from the same place[243] on Thursday night, the first long chapter of another, with both illustrations; and from some place that no one can spell but sounds like Ballyhoolish, on Saturday, the closing chapter of that number, which will keep us all safe until I return to town." Nine days later, he wrote from "Ballechelish," "I've done all I can or need to do for Barnaby until I get home, and the story is progressing (I hope you'll think) with good strong interest. I’ve left it at an exciting point, with the start of the riots. In the first of the two numbers I've written since I’ve been away, I can’t remember if the blind man, while talking to Barnaby about riches, says they can be found in crowds. If I didn’t actually use that word, could you add it? A look at the proof of the next number (70) will show you how and why." "Have you," he wrote shortly after his return (29th July), "seen No. 71? I thought there was a good glimpse of a crowd from a window—right?" He had now really gotten into the interest of his closing chapters, feeling more than ever the limits of his publishing format. "I'm getting really excited" (on 5th August from Broadstairs) "about Barnaby. Oh! if I only had him, from now to the end, in monthly numbers. N'importe! I hope the interest will be pretty strong,—and, in every number, stronger." Six days later, from the same place: "I was always sure I could make a good thing out of Barnaby, and I think you'll see it comes out strong to the last word. I have another number ready, just two slips shy. Don’t worry about young Chester. The time hasn't come—there we go again, with the weekly delays. I'm feeling[244] great about the story, and looking forward to having time to think before I go on again." A month's break followed, and what happened during it will be described shortly. On 11th September, he wrote, "I just entered Newgate, and in the next number, I'm going to tear the prisoners out by the hair. You'll have the proof of the number that gets into the jail by Tuesday." This was followed up a week later: "I've let all the prisoners out of Newgate, burnt down Lord Mansfield's, and caused total chaos. Another number will wrap up the fires and help us move toward the end. I feel quite smoky when I'm working. I really need some space." Alongside this trouble, more serious issues arose upon his return, including serious personal illness; but he handled it bravely, and I never had a better opportunity than now to observe his quiet endurance of pain, how little he thought of himself when self-regard is usually at its peak, and the steadfast duty with which he tackled everything he felt was necessary to do, despite being unwell. He was still in his sick room (22nd October) when he wrote, "I hope I won’t stop again until I finish Barnaby." Three days later, he was eagerly working for others; and on 2nd November, the printers received the final part of Barnaby Rudge.
This tale was Dickens's first attempt out of the sphere of the life of the day and its actual manners. Begun during the progress of Oliver Twist, it had been for some time laid aside; the form it ultimately took had been comprised only partially within its first design; and the story in its finished shape presented strongly a special purpose, the characteristic of all but his very[245] earliest writings. Its scene is laid at the time when the incessant execution of men and women, comparatively innocent, disgraced every part of the country; demoralizing thousands, whom it also prepared for the scaffold. In those days the theft of a few rags from a bleaching-ground, or the abstraction of a roll of ribbons from a counter, was visited with the penalty of blood; and such laws brutalized both their ministers and victims. It was the time, too, when a false religious outcry brought with it appalling guilt and misery. These are vices that leave more behind them than the first forms assumed, and they involve a lesson sufficiently required to justify a writer in dealing with them. There were also others grafted on them. In Barnaby himself it was desired to show what sources of comfort there might be, for the patient and cheerful heart, in even the worst of all human afflictions; and in the hunted life of his outcast father, whose crime had entailed not that affliction only but other more fearful wretchedness, we have as powerful a picture as any in his writings of the inevitable and unfathomable consequences of sin. But, as the story went on, it was incident to these designs that what had been accomplished in its predecessor could hardly be attained here, in singleness of purpose, unity of idea, or harmony of treatment; and other defects supervened in the management of the plot. The interest with which the tale begins has ceased to be its interest before the close; and what has chiefly taken the reader's fancy at the outset almost wholly disappears in the power and passion with which, in the later chapters, the great riots are described. So admirable is this description, however, that it would be[246] hard to have to surrender it even for a more perfect structure of fable.
This story was Dickens's first effort outside the realm of contemporary life and its actual customs. It started while he was working on Oliver Twist, but he set it aside for a while; the final version ended up being only partly aligned with his initial concept. The finished story strongly presented a specific purpose, which is a common trait in all but his earliest works. It is set in a time when the constant execution of relatively innocent people shamed the entire country, demoralizing thousands who were also prepared for the gallows. Back then, stealing a few rags from a bleaching yard or a roll of ribbons from a counter was punishable by death; such laws dehumanized both those who enforced them and those who fell victim to them. It was also an era when a false religious outcry brought immense guilt and suffering. These vices leave behind more than their initial forms and carry a lesson significant enough to warrant a writer addressing them. There were also other issues intertwined with these. Through Barnaby, the narrative aimed to show the sources of comfort that a patient and optimistic heart could find even in the worst human suffering; and in the troubled life of his outcast father, whose crime led to not just that suffering but even greater misery, we have a compelling representation of the inevitable and profound consequences of sin. However, as the story unfolded, it became apparent that the accomplishments of its predecessor could hardly be replicated here in terms of single-minded purpose, unified ideas, or cohesive treatment, leading to additional flaws in the plot management. The interest that captivated readers at the beginning dissipated by the end, and what initially engaged the reader almost entirely vanished in the intense power and passion with which the later chapters describe the major riots. Despite this, the depiction is so remarkable that it would be tough to let it go, even for a more perfect narrative structure.
There are few things more masterly in any of his books. From the first low mutterings of the storm to its last terrible explosion, this frantic outbreak of popular ignorance and rage is depicted with unabated power. The aimlessness of idle mischief by which the ranks of the rioters are swelled at the beginning; the recklessness induced by the monstrous impunity allowed to the early excesses; the sudden spread of this drunken guilt into every haunt of poverty, ignorance, or mischief in the wicked old city, where the rich materials of crime lie festering; the wild action of its poison on all, without scheme or plan of any kind, who come within its reach; the horrors that are more bewildering for this complete absence of purpose in them; and, when all is done, the misery found to have been self-inflicted in every cranny and corner of London, as if a plague had swept over the streets: these are features in the picture of an actual occurrence, to which the manner of the treatment gives extraordinary force and meaning. Nor, in the sequel, is there anything displayed with more profitable vividness than the law's indiscriminate cruelty at last, in contrast with its cowardly indifference at first; while, among the casual touches lighting up the scene with flashes of reality that illumine every part of it, may be instanced the discovery, in the quarter from which screams for succor are loudest when Newgate is supposed to be accidentally on fire, of four men who were certain in any case to have perished on the drop next day.
There are few things more skillfully done in any of his books. From the first low rumblings of the storm to its last, terrifying explosion, this wild outburst of public ignorance and anger is depicted with unwavering intensity. The pointless mischief that initially swells the ranks of the rioters; the recklessness brought on by the outrageous lack of consequences for the early chaos; the rapid spread of this reckless guilt into every area of poverty, ignorance, or trouble in the corrupt old city, where the ingredients for crime are rotting away; the chaotic impact of its poison on everyone, without any plan or scheme, who come into contact with it; the horrors that are even more confusing because of their complete lack of purpose; and, when everything is said and done, the misery found to be self-inflicted in every nook and cranny of London, as if a plague had swept through the streets: these are features in the picture of a real event, to which the style of the treatment adds remarkable strength and significance. Nor, in the aftermath, is there anything shown with more striking clarity than the law's indiscriminate cruelty at last, compared to its cowardly indifference at first; while, among the random details that light up the scene with flashes of reality illuminating every part of it, the discovery in the area from which cries for help are loudest when Newgate is believed to be accidentally on fire of four men who were definitely going to be executed the next day stands out.
The story, which has unusually careful writing in it,[247] and much manly upright thinking, has not so many people eagerly adopted as of kin by everybody, as its predecessors are famous for; but it has yet a fair proportion of such as take solid form within the mind and keep hold of the memory. To these belong in an especial degree Gabriel Varden and his household, on whom are lavished all the writer's fondness and not a little of his keenest humor. The honest locksmith with his jovial jug, and the tink-tink-tink of his pleasant nature making cheerful music out of steel and iron; the buxom wife, with her plaguy tongue that makes every one wretched whom her kindly disposition would desire to make happy; the good-hearted plump little Dolly, coquettish minx of a daughter, with all she suffers and inflicts by her fickle winning ways and her small self-admiring vanities; and Miggs the vicious and slippery, acid, amatory, and of uncomfortable figure, sower of family discontents and discords, who swears all the while she wouldn't make or meddle with 'em "not for a annual gold-mine and found in tea and sugar:" there is not much social painting anywhere with a better domestic moral than in all these; and a nice propriety of feeling and thought regulates the use of such satire throughout. No one knows more exactly how far to go with that formidable weapon, or understands better that what satirizes everything, in effect satirizes nothing.
The story, which features particularly careful writing,[247] and a lot of strong, principled thinking, hasn't been embraced by as many people as its famous predecessors; however, it still has a fair number of characters that stick in your mind and linger in memory. Among these are especially Gabriel Varden and his family, who receive the writer's affection and a good dose of his sharpest humor. The honest locksmith with his cheerful drink, and the tink-tink-tink of his pleasant nature creating joyful music from steel and iron; the stout wife with her annoying tongue that makes everyone miserable whom her well-meaning heart aims to please; the good-natured, plump little Dolly, a flirtatious daughter who causes both suffering and delight with her capricious charm and self-admiration; and Miggs, the nasty, sly, bitter, lovesick, uncomfortable figure, stirring up family tensions and conflicts, who claims she'd never create or interfere with them "not for an annual goldmine found in tea and sugar." There's not much social commentary anywhere with a better domestic lesson than in all these; and a nice propriety of feeling and thought guides the use of such satire throughout. No one knows exactly how far to go with that powerful tool, or understands better that whatever mocks everything, in effect, mocks nothing.
Another excellent group is that which the story opens with, in the quaint old kitchen of the Maypole; John Willett and his friends, genuinely comic creations all of them. Then we have Barnaby and his raven: the light-hearted idiot, as unconscious of guilt as of suffering,[248] and happy with no sense but of the influences of nature; and the grave sly bird, with sufficient sense to make himself as unhappy as rascally habits will make the human animal. There is poor brutish Hugh, too, loitering lazily outside the Maypole door, with a storm of passions in him raging to be let loose; already the scaffold's withered fruit, as he is doomed to be its ripe offering; and though with all the worst instincts of the savage, yet not without also some of the best. Still farther out of kindly nature's pitying reach lurks the worst villain of the scene: with this sole claim to consideration, that it was by constant contact with the filthiest instrument of law and state he had become the mass of moral filth he is. Mr. Dennis the hangman is a portrait that Hogarth would have painted with the same wholesome severity of satire which is employed upon it in Barnaby Rudge[249].
Another great group is the one that the story starts with, in the charming old kitchen of the Maypole; John Willett and his friends, all genuinely funny characters. Then there’s Barnaby and his raven: the cheerful fool, as unaware of guilt as he is of suffering, [248] and happy only in tune with the rhythms of nature; and the clever, sly bird, who has just enough sense to make himself as miserable as the worst human habits can make someone. There's also poor brutish Hugh, hanging around lazily outside the Maypole door, with a storm of emotions inside him ready to explode; already the withered fruit of the gallows, as he is destined to be its ripe offering; and though he has all the worst instincts of the savage, he also possesses some of the better ones. Even further out of the kind embrace of nature lurks the worst villain of the scene: with the only reason for consideration being that his constant exposure to the filthiest tools of law and state has turned him into a mass of moral corruption. Mr. Dennis the hangman is a character that Hogarth would have painted with the same sharp satire that is used in Barnaby Rudge[249].
CHAPTER XV.
PUBLIC DINNER IN EDINBURGH.
1841.
Among the occurrences of the year, apart from the tale he was writing, the birth of his fourth child and second son has been briefly mentioned. "I mean to call the boy Edgar," he wrote, the day after he was born (9th February), "a good honest Saxon name, I think." He changed his mind in a few days, however, on resolving to ask Landor to be godfather. This intention, as soon as formed, he announced to our excellent old friend, telling him it would give the child something to boast of, to be called Walter Landor, and that to call him so would do his own heart good. For, as to himself, whatever realities had gone out of the ceremony of christening, the meaning still[250] remained in it of enabling him to form a relationship with friends he most loved; and as to the boy, he held that to give him a name to be proud of was to give him also another reason for doing nothing unworthy or untrue when he came to be a man. Walter, alas! only lived to manhood. He obtained a military cadetship through the kindness of Miss Coutts, and died at Calcutta on the last day of 1863, in his twenty-third year.
Among the events of the year, besides the story he was writing, the birth of his fourth child and second son is briefly mentioned. "I plan to name the boy Edgar," he wrote the day after his birth (February 9th), "a good honest Saxon name, I think." However, he changed his mind a few days later, deciding to ask Landor to be the godfather. As soon as he made this decision, he told our wonderful old friend, explaining that it would give the child something to be proud of, being named Walter Landor, and that using that name would make him happy. For himself, despite how the actual event of the christening had lost some of its significance, it still held the meaning of allowing him to connect with the friends he cherished most; and for the boy, he believed that giving him a name to be proud of would also give him another reason to avoid doing anything shameful or dishonest when he grew up. Sadly, Walter only lived to adulthood. He got a military cadetship thanks to Miss Coutts's kindness and died in Calcutta on the last day of 1863 at the age of twenty-two.
The interest taken by this distinguished lady in him and in his had begun, as I have said, at an earlier date than even this; and I remember, while Oliver Twist was going on, his pleasure because of her father's mention of him in a speech at Birmingham, for his advocacy of the cause of the poor. Whether to the new poor-law Sir Francis Burdett objected as strongly as we have seen that Dickens did, as well as many other excellent men, who forgot the atrocities of the system it displaced in their indignation at the needless and cruel harshness with which it was worked at the outset, I have not at hand the means of knowing. But certainly this continued to be strongly the feeling of Dickens, who exulted in nothing so much as at any misadventure to the Whigs in connection with it. "How often used Black and I," he wrote to me in April, "to quarrel about the effect of the poor-law bill! Walter comes in upon the cry. See whether the Whigs go out upon it." It was the strong desire he had to make himself heard upon it, even in Parliament, that led him not immediately to turn aside from a proposal, now privately made by some of the magnates of Reading, to bring him in for that borough; but the notion was soon dismissed,[251] as, on its revival more than once in later times, it continued very wisely to be. His opinions otherwise were extremely radical at present, as will be apparent shortly; and he did not at all relish Peel's majority of one when it came soon after, and unseated the Whigs. It was just now, I may add, he greatly enjoyed a quiet setting-down of Moore by Rogers at Sir Francis Burdett's table, for talking exaggerated toryism. So debased was the House of Commons by reform, said Moore, that a Burke, if you could find him, would not be listened to. "No such thing, Tommy," said Rogers; "find yourself, and they'd listen even to you."
The interest this distinguished lady had in him and his affairs had actually started earlier than what I've mentioned, and I remember that during the run of Oliver Twist, he was pleased when her father brought him up in a speech in Birmingham, praising him for championing the poor. I’m not sure if Sir Francis Burdett opposed the new poor law as vehemently as Dickens and many other admirable men did. They overlooked the horrors of the system it replaced, focused instead on the unnecessary and cruel harshness with which it was initially enforced. But it was clear that Dickens strongly felt this way; he celebrated any misfortune the Whigs faced regarding it. "How often did Black and I argue," he wrote to me in April, "about the impact of the poor-law bill! Walter jumps in on the discussion. Let's see if the Whigs are ousted because of it." He was eager to make his voice heard on the issue, even in Parliament, which is why he considered a private offer from some influential people in Reading to help him secure a seat there. However, that idea was quickly dropped, and even when it came up again later, it was smartly dismissed. His views were quite radical at this time, as you'll soon see; he wasn’t happy when Peel’s narrow victory came shortly after and removed the Whigs from power. I should also mention that he really enjoyed when Rogers put Moore in his place at Sir Francis Burdett's dinner table for his over-the-top Tory comments. Moore claimed that the House of Commons had become so degraded by reform that even a Burke wouldn’t be heard if he were found. "Not true, Tommy," Rogers replied; "find yourself, and they'd even listen to you."
This was not many days before he hinted to me an intention soon to be carried out in a rather memorable manner: "I have done nothing to-day" (18th March: we had bought books together, the day before, at Tom Hill's sale) "but cut the Swift, looking into it with a delicious laziness in all manner of delightful places, and put poor Tom's books away. I had a letter from Edinburgh this morning, announcing that Jeffrey's visit to London will be the week after next; telling me that he drives about Edinburgh declaring there has been 'nothing so good as Nell since Cordelia,' which he writes also to all manner of people; and informing me of a desire in that romantic town to give me greeting and welcome. For this and other reasons I am disposed to make Scotland my destination in June rather than Ireland. Think, do think, meantime (here are ten good weeks), whether you couldn't, by some effort worthy of the owner of the gigantic helmet, go with us. Think of such a fortnight,—York, Carlisle, Berwick, your own Borders, Edinburgh, Rob Roy's country, railroads,[252] cathedrals, country inns, Arthur's Seat, lochs, glens, and home by sea. DO think of this, seriously, at leisure." It was very tempting, but not to be.
This was just a few days before he hinted to me about a plan he intended to carry out in a memorable way: "I haven't done anything today" (18th March: we bought books together the day before at Tom Hill's sale) "except browse through the Swift, getting lost in it with a delightful laziness in all sorts of wonderful places, and putting away poor Tom's books. I received a letter from Edinburgh this morning, saying that Jeffrey's visit to London will be the week after next; it mentions that he drives around Edinburgh declaring there hasn't been 'anything as good as Nell since Cordelia,' which he also writes to all sorts of people; and it tells me there’s a desire in that romantic town to give me a greeting and welcome. For this and other reasons, I'm thinking of making Scotland my destination in June instead of Ireland. Please, do think about it (we have ten good weeks) and see if you could, through some effort worthy of the owner of the gigantic helmet, join us. Imagine such a fortnight—York, Carlisle, Berwick, your own Borders, Edinburgh, Rob Roy's country, railroads, [252] cathedrals, country inns, Arthur's Seat, lochs, glens, and home by sea. Please think about this seriously, when you have the time." It was very tempting, but it wasn't meant to be.
Early in April Jeffrey came, many feasts and entertainments welcoming him, of which he very sparingly partook; and before he left, the visit to Scotland in June was all duly arranged, to be initiated by the splendid welcome of a public dinner in Edinburgh, with Lord Jeffrey himself in the chair. Allan the painter had come up meanwhile, with increasing note of preparation; and it was while we were all regretting Wilkie's absence abroad, and Dickens with warrantable pride was saying how surely the great painter would have gone to this dinner, that the shock of his sudden death[37] came, and there was left but the sorrowful satisfaction of honoring his memory. There was one other change before the day. "I heard from Edinburgh this morning," he wrote on the 15th of June. "Jeffrey is not well enough to take the chair, so Wilson does. I think under all circumstances of politics, acquaintance, and Edinburgh Review, that it's much better as it is—Don't you?"
Early in April, Jeffrey arrived, welcomed by many feasts and celebrations, though he took part in them sparingly. Before he left, the visit to Scotland in June was all set up, starting with a grand public dinner in Edinburgh, where Lord Jeffrey would be in charge. Meanwhile, Allan the painter had come up, preparing more and more. As we all lamented Wilkie's absence abroad, and Dickens, with justifiable pride, remarked that the great painter would surely have attended this dinner, we received the shock of his sudden death[37] leaving us with nothing but the sorrowful satisfaction of honoring his memory. There was one more change before the day arrived. "I heard from Edinburgh this morning," he wrote on June 15. "Jeffrey is not well enough to take the chair, so Wilson is. Given all the circumstances of politics, friendship, and the Edinburgh Review, I think it's much better this way—Don't you?"
His first letter from Edinburgh, where he and Mrs. Dickens had taken up quarters at the Royal Hotel on their arrival the previous night, is dated the 23d of June: "I have been this morning to the Parliament House, and am now introduced (I hope) to everybody in Edinburgh. The hotel is perfectly besieged, and[253] I have been forced to take refuge in a sequestered apartment at the end of a long passage, wherein I write this letter. They talk of 300 at the dinner. We are very well off in point of rooms, having a handsome sitting-room, another next to it for Clock purposes, a spacious bedroom, and large dressing-room adjoining. The castle is in front of the windows, and the view noble. There was a supper ready last night which would have been a dinner anywhere." This was his first practical experience of the honors his fame had won for him, and it found him as eager to receive as all were eager to give. Very interesting still, too, are those who took leading part in the celebration; and in his pleasant sketches of them there are some once famous and familiar figures not so well known to the present generation. Here, among the first, are Wilson and Robertson.
His first letter from Edinburgh, where he and Mrs. Dickens checked into the Royal Hotel after arriving the night before, is dated June 23rd: "I went this morning to the Parliament House and am now (I hope) introduced to everyone in Edinburgh. The hotel is completely crowded, and[253] I’ve had to take refuge in a secluded room at the end of a long hallway, where I’m writing this letter. They’re expecting about 300 people for dinner. We’re quite well off in terms of space, as we have a nice sitting room, another room next door for Clock purposes, a spacious bedroom, and a large dressing room attached. The castle is right in front of our windows, and the view is stunning. Last night there was a supper prepared that would have counted as dinner anywhere." This was his first real taste of the recognition his fame had brought him, and he was just as eager to receive it as everyone else was to give it. It’s still very interesting who played a key role in the celebration; in his enjoyable sketches of them, there are some once-famous figures that aren’t as well known to today’s generation. Among the first are Wilson and Robertson.
"The renowned Peter Robertson is a large, portly, full-faced man, with a merry eye, and a queer way of looking under his spectacles which is characteristic and pleasant. He seems a very warm-hearted earnest man too, and I felt quite at home with him forthwith. Walking up and down the hall of the courts of law (which was full of advocates, writers to the signet, clerks, and idlers) was a tall, burly, handsome man of eight-and-fifty, with a gait like O'Connell's, the bluest eye you can imagine, and long hair—longer than mine—falling down in a wild way under the broad brim of his hat. He had on a surtout coat, a blue checked shirt; the collar standing up, and kept in its place with a wisp of black neckerchief; no waistcoat; and a large pocket-handkerchief thrust into his[254] breast, which was all broad and open. At his heels followed a wiry, sharp-eyed, shaggy devil of a terrier, dogging his steps as he went slashing up and down, now with one man beside him, now with another, and now quite alone, but always at a fast, rolling pace, with his head in the air, and his eyes as wide open as he could get them. I guessed it was Wilson, and it was. A bright, clear-complexioned, mountain-looking fellow, he looks as though he had just come down from the Highlands, and had never in his life taken pen in hand. But he has had an attack of paralysis in his right arm, within this month. He winced when I shook hands with him; and once or twice, when we were walking up and down, slipped as if he had stumbled on a piece of orange-peel. He is a great fellow to look at, and to talk to; and, if you could divest your mind of the actual Scott, is just the figure you would put in his place."
The famous Peter Robertson is a large, sturdy man with a round face, a cheerful eye, and a quirky way of peeking out from under his glasses that's both distinctive and enjoyable. He comes across as quite warm-hearted and sincere, making me feel comfortable with him right away. Strolling up and down the court's hallway, which was crowded with lawyers, legal clerks, and onlookers, was a tall, solidly built, handsome man in his late fifties, walking with a gait reminiscent of O'Connell's, sporting strikingly blue eyes, and long hair—longer than mine—falling wildly beneath the broad brim of his hat. He wore a long coat and a blue checked shirt with the collar popped up, held in place by a black neckerchief; he had no waistcoat and a large handkerchief stuffed into his open chest pocket. Following him closely was a wiry, sharp-eyed, scruffy terrier, keeping pace as he dashed back and forth, sometimes alongside one person, sometimes another, and at times completely solo, but always moving quickly with his head held high and eyes wide open. I figured it was Wilson, and it was. He looked bright and fresh-faced, like someone who’d just descended from the Highlands and had never picked up a pen in his life. However, he had suffered a paralysis attack in his right arm recently. He flinched when I shook his hand, and a couple of times while we were walking, he stumbled as if he had tripped over an orange peel. He’s definitely an impressive person to look at and talk to, and if you could forget that he was Scott, he would be just the person you’d picture in that role.
Nor have the most ordinary incidents of the visit any lack of interest for us now, in so far as they help to complete the picture of himself: "Allan has been squiring me about, all the morning. He and Fletcher have gone to a meeting of the dinner-stewards, and I take the opportunity of writing to you. They dine with us to-day, and we are going to-night to the theatre. M'Ian is playing there. I mean to leave a card for him before evening. We are engaged for every day of our stay, already; but the people I have seen are so very hearty and warm in their manner that much of the horrors of lionization gives way before it. I am glad to find that they propose giving me for a toast on Friday the Memory of Wilkie. I should have liked it better[255] than anything, if I could have made my choice. Communicate all particulars to Mac. I would to God you were both here. Do dine together at the Gray's Inn on Friday, and think of me. If I don't drink my first glass of wine to you, may my pistols miss fire, and my mare slip her shoulder. All sorts of regard from Kate. She has gone with Miss Allan to see the house she was born in, etc. Write me soon, and long, etc."
Nor have the most ordinary incidents of the visit lost interest for us now, as they help paint a fuller picture of him: "Allan has been showing me around all morning. He and Fletcher have gone to a meeting of the dinner-stewards, so I’m taking the chance to write to you. They’re having dinner with us today, and we’re going to the theater tonight. M'Ian is performing there. I plan to leave a card for him before the evening. We’re booked solid for every day of our stay already, but the people I’ve met are so warm and welcoming that it makes much of the stress of being in the spotlight fade away. I’m pleased to hear they plan to toast ‘The Memory of Wilkie’ on Friday. I would have preferred that over anything else if I could have chosen. Please share all the details with Mac. I wish you were both here. Do have dinner together at Gray's Inn on Friday and think of me. If I don't raise my first glass of wine to you, may my pistols misfire and my mare slip her shoulder. All sorts of regards from Kate. She has gone with Miss Allan to see the house where she was born, etc. Write to me soon, and at length, etc."
His next letter was written the morning after the dinner, on Saturday, the 26th June: "The great event is over; and, being gone, I am a man again. It was the most brilliant affair you can conceive; the completest success possible, from first to last. The room was crammed, and more than seventy applicants for tickets were of necessity refused yesterday. Wilson was ill, but plucked up like a lion, and spoke famously.[38] I[256] send you a paper herewith, but the report is dismal in the extreme. They say there will be a better one—I don't know where or when. Should there be, I will send it to you. I think (ahem!) that I spoke rather well. It was an excellent room, and both the subjects (Wilson and Scottish Literature, and the Memory of Wilkie) were good to go upon. There were nearly two hundred ladies present. The place is so contrived that the cross table is raised enormously: much above the[257] heads of people sitting below: and the effect on first coming in (on me, I mean) was rather tremendous. I was quite self-possessed, however, and, notwithstanding the enthoosemoosy, which was very startling, as cool as a cucumber. I wish to God you had been there, as it is impossible for the 'distinguished guest' to describe the scene. It beat all natur." . . .
His next letter was written the morning after dinner, on Saturday, June 26th: "The big event is over; now that it’s done, I'm a man again. It was the most amazing affair you can imagine; a complete success from start to finish. The room was packed, and more than seventy people who wanted tickets had to be turned away yesterday. Wilson was sick but rallied like a champ and spoke brilliantly. I’m sending you a newspaper article along with this, but the report is pretty bleak. They say there will be a better one—I have no idea when or where. If that happens, I’ll send it to you. I think (ahem!) that I spoke fairly well. It was a fantastic room, and both topics (Wilson and Scottish Literature, and the Memory of Wilkie) were excellent. There were nearly two hundred women in attendance. The way the space is set up, the main table is situated way up high, much above the heads of the people sitting below, and the effect when I first walked in (I mean for me) was quite overwhelming. I managed to keep my composure, though, and despite the enthusiasm, which was quite surprising, I was as cool as a cucumber. I wish to God you had been there; it's impossible for the 'distinguished guest' to truly capture the scene. It was beyond anything you can imagine."
Here was the close of his letter: "I have been expecting every day to hear from you, and not hearing mean to make this the briefest epistle possible. We start next Sunday (that's to-morrow week). We are going out to Jeffrey's to-day (he is very unwell), and return here to-morrow evening. If I don't find a letter from you when I come back, expect no Lights and Shadows of Scottish Life from your indignant correspondent. Murray the manager made very excellent, tasteful, and gentlemanly mention of Macready, about whom Wilson had been asking me divers questions during dinner." "A hundred thanks for your letter," he writes four days later. "I read it this morning with the greatest pleasure and delight, and answer it with ditto, ditto. Where shall I begin—about my darlings? I am delighted with Charley's precocity. He takes arter his father, he does. God bless them, you can't imagine (you! how can you?) how much I long to see them. It makes me quite sorrowful to think of them. . . . Yesterday, sir, the lord provost, council, and magistrates voted me by acclamation the freedom of the city, in testimony (I quote the letter just received from 'James Forrest, lord provost') 'of the sense entertained by them of your distinguished abilities as an author.' I acknowledged this morning[258] in appropriate terms the honor they had done me, and through me the pursuit to which I was devoted. It is handsome, is it not?"
Here’s the end of his letter: "I've been expecting to hear from you every day, and since I haven't, I’ll keep this note as brief as possible. We're leaving next Sunday (that’s tomorrow week). We’re going to Jeffrey's today (he’s not feeling well) and will be back tomorrow evening. If I don’t find a letter from you when I return, don’t expect any Lights and Shadows of Scottish Life from your upset correspondent. Murray, the manager, made a really nice, tasteful, and respectful mention of Macready, about whom Wilson had been asking me various questions during dinner." "A hundred thanks for your letter," he writes four days later. "I read it this morning with great pleasure and joy, and I’m answering it with the same feelings. Where should I start—about my loved ones? I’m thrilled with Charley’s smarts. He takes after his father, he really does. God bless them, you can't imagine (you! how can you?) how much I miss seeing them. It makes me quite sad to think about them... Yesterday, the lord provost, council, and magistrates voted me the freedom of the city by acclamation, as a recognition (I quote the letter just received from 'James Forrest, lord provost') 'of the admiration they hold for your outstanding abilities as an author.' I acknowledged this honor this morning[258] in proper terms on behalf of myself and the work I've dedicated myself to. It is quite nice, isn’t it?"
The parchment scroll of the city-freedom, recording the grounds on which it was voted, hung framed in his study to the last, and was one of his valued possessions. Answering some question of mine, he told me further as to the speakers, and gave some amusing glimpses of the party-spirit which still at that time ran high in the capital of the north.
The framed parchment scroll of the city’s freedom, listing the reasons it was voted for, hung in his study until the end and was one of his prized possessions. When I asked him a question, he shared more about the speakers and provided some entertaining insights into the strong party spirit that was still prevalent in the northern capital at that time.
"The men who spoke at the dinner were all the most rising men here, and chiefly at the Bar. They were all, alternately, Whigs and Tories; with some few Radicals, such as Gordon, who gave the memory of Burns. He is Wilson's son-in-law and the lord-advocate's nephew—a very masterly speaker indeed, who ought to become a distinguished man. Neaves, who gave the other poets, a little too lawyer-like for my taste, is a great gun in the courts. Mr. Primrose is Lord Rosebery's son. Adam Black, the publisher as you know. Dr. Alison, a very popular friend of the poor. Robertson you know. Allan you know. Colquhoun is an advocate. All these men were selected for the toasts as being crack speakers, known men, and opposed to each other very strongly in politics. For this reason, the professors and so forth who sat upon the platform about me made no speeches and had none assigned them. I felt it was very remarkable to see such a number of gray-headed men gathered about my brown flowing locks; and it struck most of those who were present very forcibly. The judges, solicitor-general, lord-advocate, and so forth, were all here to call, the day after[259] our arrival. The judges never go to public dinners in Scotland. Lord Meadowbank alone broke through the custom, and none of his successors have imitated him. It will give you a good notion of party to hear that the solicitor-general and lord-advocate refused to go, though they had previously engaged, unless the croupier or the chairman were a Whig. Both (Wilson and Robertson) were Tories, simply because, Jeffrey excepted, no Whig could be found who was adapted to the office. The solicitor laid strict injunctions on Napier not to go if a Whig were not in office. No Whig was, and he stayed away. I think this is good?—bearing in mind that all the old Whigs of Edinburgh were cracking their throats in the room. They gave out that they were ill, and the lord-advocate did actually lie in bed all the afternoon; but this is the real truth, and one of the judges told it me with great glee. It seems they couldn't quite trust Wilson or Robertson, as they thought; and feared some Tory demonstration. Nothing of the kind took place; and ever since, these men have been the loudest in their praises of the whole affair."
The speakers at the dinner were all prominent figures, mainly from the Bar. They took turns identifying as Whigs and Tories, with a few Radicals thrown in, like Gordon, who honored Burns. He is Wilson's son-in-law and the lord-advocate's nephew—a truly skilled speaker who deserves to become well-known. Neaves, who mentioned the other poets, was a bit too lawyer-like for my taste but is a big player in the courts. Mr. Primrose is Lord Rosebery's son. Adam Black, the publisher, is known to you. Dr. Alison is a very popular advocate for the poor. You know Robertson. You know Allan. Colquhoun is an advocate. All these men were chosen for the toasts because they are excellent speakers, well-known, and have strong opposing political views. For this reason, the professors and others on the platform with me did not give speeches, nor were any assigned to them. I found it quite notable to see so many gray-haired men gathered around my brown flowing hair, which struck many present quite strongly. The judges, solicitor-general, lord-advocate, and others were all here to convene the day after[259] our arrival. Judges in Scotland typically don't attend public dinners. Lord Meadowbank was the only one to break that custom, and none of his successors have followed in his footsteps. To give you a sense of the political landscape, the solicitor-general and lord-advocate declined to attend, despite prior commitments, unless the croupier or chairman was a Whig. Both (Wilson and Robertson) were Tories, simply because, aside from Jeffrey, no suitable Whig could be found for the role. The solicitor strictly instructed Napier not to attend if a Whig wasn't in office. Since no Whig was, he stayed away. I think this is interesting, considering all the old Whigs of Edinburgh were putting on a show in the room. They claimed to be unwell, and the lord-advocate actually stayed in bed all afternoon; but that's the real story, and one of the judges shared it with me with great amusement. It seems they couldn't fully trust Wilson or Robertson, as they suspected; and they feared some Tory backlash. Nothing of the sort happened, and since then, these men have been the most vocal in praising the entire event.
The close of his letter tells us all his engagements, and completes his graceful picture of the hearty Scottish welcome given him. It has also some personal touches that may be thought worth preserving. "A threat reached me last night (they have been hammering at it in their papers, it seems, for some time) of a dinner at Glasgow. But I hope, having circulated false rumors of my movements, to get away before they send to me; and only to stop there on my way home, to change horses and send to the post-office. . . . You[260] will like to know how we have been living. Here's a list of engagements, past and present. Wednesday, we dined at home, and went incog. to the theatre at night, to Murray's box; the pieces admirably done, and M'Ian in the Two Drovers quite wonderful and most affecting. Thursday, to Lord Murray's; dinner and evening party. Friday, the dinner. Saturday, to Jeffrey's, a beautiful place about three miles off" (Craigcrook, which at Lord Jeffrey's invitation I afterwards visited with him), "stop there all night, dine on Sunday, and home at eleven. Monday, dine at Dr. Alison's, four miles off. Tuesday, dinner and evening party at Allan's. Wednesday, breakfast with Napier, dine with Blackwood's seven miles off, evening party at the treasurer's of the town-council, supper with all the artists (!!). Thursday, lunch at the solicitor-general's, dine at Lord Gillies's, evening party at Joseph Gordon's, one of Brougham's earliest supporters. Friday, dinner and evening party at Robertson's. Saturday, dine again at Jeffrey's; back to the theatre, at half-past nine to the moment, for public appearance;[39] places all let, etc. etc. etc. Sunday, off at seven o'clock in the morning to Stirling, and then to Callender, a stage further. Next day, to Loch Earn, and pull up there for three days, to rest and work. The moral of all this is, that there is no place like home; and that I thank God most heartily for having given me a quiet spirit, and a heart that won't hold many people. I sigh for Devonshire[261] Terrace and Broadstairs, for battledoor and shuttlecock; I want to dine in a blouse with you and Mac; and I feel Topping's merits more acutely than I have ever done in my life. On Sunday evening, the 17th of July, I shall revisit my household gods, please Heaven. I wish the day were here. For God's sake be in waiting. I wish you and Mac would dine in Devonshire Terrace that day with Fred. He has the key of the cellar. Do. We shall be at Inverary in the Highlands on Tuesday week, getting to it through the Pass of Glencoe, of which you may have heard! On Thursday following we shall be at Glasgow, where I shall hope to receive your last letter before we meet. At Inverary, too, I shall make sure of finding at least one, at the post-office. . . . Little Allan is trying hard for the post of queen's limner for Scotland, vacant by poor Wilkie's death. Every one is in his favor but ——, who is jobbing for some one else. Appoint him, will you, and I'll give up the premiership.—How I breakfasted to-day in the house where Scott lived seven-and-twenty years; how I have made solemn pledges to write about missing children in the Edinburgh Review, and will do my best to keep them; how I have declined to be brought in, free gratis for nothing and qualified to boot, for a Scotch county that's going a-begging, lest I should be thought to have dined on Friday under false pretenses; these, with other marvels, shall be yours anon. . . . I must leave off sharp, to get dressed and off upon the seven miles' dinner-trip. Kate's affectionate regards. My hearty loves to Mac and Grim." Grim was another great artist having the same beginning to his name, whose tragic studies had suggested an[262] epithet quite inapplicable to any of his personal qualities.
The end of his letter sums up all his plans and finishes the lovely image of the warm Scottish welcome he received. It also includes some personal notes that might be worth keeping. "I received a threat last night (it seems they've been pushing it in their papers for a while) about a dinner in Glasgow. But I hope to leave before they manage to reach out to me, and only stop there on my way home to change horses and send something to the post office. . . . You'll want to know how we’ve been living. Here’s a list of engagements, past and present. Wednesday, we had dinner at home and went incognito to the theater that night, to Murray's box; the performances were excellent, and M'Ian in the Two Drovers was truly amazing and very moving. Thursday, we went to Lord Murray's for dinner and an evening party. Friday, was the dinner. Saturday, we visited Jeffrey's, a beautiful place about three miles away" (Craigcrook, which I later visited with him at Lord Jeffrey's invitation), "stayed there all night, had dinner on Sunday, and got home by eleven. Monday, dinner at Dr. Alison's, four miles away. Tuesday, dinner and an evening party at Allan's. Wednesday, breakfast with Napier, dinner with Blackwood’s seven miles away, evening party at the treasurer's of the town council, and supper with all the artists (!!). Thursday, lunch at the solicitor-general's, dinner at Lord Gillies's, and an evening party at Joseph Gordon's, one of Brougham’s earliest supporters. Friday, dinner and an evening party at Robertson's. Saturday, we had dinner again at Jeffrey's; back to the theater precisely at half-past nine for a public appearance; all places sold out, etc. etc. etc. Sunday, off at seven o'clock in the morning to Stirling, and then to Callender, another stage further. The next day, to Loch Earn, and we'll stay there for three days, to rest and work. The moral of all this is that there's no place like home, and I am truly grateful to God for giving me a calm spirit and a heart that doesn’t hold many people. I long for Devonshire Terrace and Broadstairs, for battledoor and shuttlecock; I want to have dinner in a hoodie with you and Mac; and I feel Topping's worth more keenly than I ever have. On Sunday evening, July 17th, I plan to return to my home, please God. I wish the day were here. Please be ready. I hope you and Mac can have dinner at Devonshire Terrace that day with Fred. He has the key to the cellar. Do. We’ll be in Inverary in the Highlands on Tuesday next week, getting there through the Pass of Glencoe, which you may have heard of! The following Thursday, we’ll be in Glasgow, where I hope to receive your last letter before we meet. At Inverary, too, I’ll make sure to find at least one letter at the post office. . . . Little Allan is trying really hard to get the position of queen's limner for Scotland, which is open due to poor Wilkie's death. Everyone is supporting him except for ——, who is pushing for someone else. Please appoint him, and I'll give up the premiership.—How I had breakfast today in the house where Scott lived twenty-seven years; how I have made solemn promises to write about missing children in the Edinburgh Review, and will do my best to keep them; how I have turned down being nominated, free of charge and qualified to boot, for a Scotch county that's up for grabs, lest I be thought to have dined on Friday under false pretenses; these, along with other surprises, will be shared with you soon. . . . I must wrap this up quickly to get dressed and head out on the seven-mile dinner trip. Kate sends her affectionate regards. My warm love to Mac and Grim." Grim was another great artist with the same beginning to his name, whose tragic studies had given him a nickname completely unrelated to any of his personal traits.
The narrative of the trip to the Highlands must have a chapter to itself and its incidents of adventure and comedy. The latter chiefly were due to the guide who accompanied him, a quasi-Highlander himself, named a few pages back as Mr. Kindheart, whose real name was Mr. Angus Fletcher, and to whom it hardly needs that I should give other mention than will be supplied by such future notices of him as my friend's letters may contain. He had a wayward kind of talent, which he could never concentrate on a settled pursuit; and though at the time we knew him first he had taken up the profession of a sculptor, he abandoned it soon afterwards. His mother, a woman distinguished by many remarkable qualities, lived now in the English lake-country; and it was no fault of hers that this home was no longer her son's. But what mainly had closed it to him was undoubtedly not less the secret of such liking for him as Dickens had. Fletcher's eccentricities and absurdities, often divided by the thinnest partition from the most foolish extravagance, but occasionally clever, and always the genuine though whimsical outgrowth of the life he led, had a curious sort of charm for Dickens. He enjoyed the oddity and humor; tolerated all the rest; and to none more freely than to Kindheart during the next few years, both in Italy and in England, opened his house and hospitality. The close of the poor fellow's life, alas! was in only too sad agreement with all the previous course of it; but this will have mention hereafter. He is waiting now to introduce Dickens to the Highlands.
The story of the trip to the Highlands deserves its own chapter filled with adventure and comedy. Most of the humor came from the guide, a sort-of Highlander named Mr. Kindheart, who was actually Mr. Angus Fletcher. I won’t go into more detail about him right now, as my friend's future letters will provide more information. He had a quirky talent that he could never focus on any one thing. Although he had started out as a sculptor, he soon gave that up. His mother, a remarkable woman, lived in the English lake country, and it wasn’t her fault that her home was no longer his. What mainly drove him away was probably Dickens’s complicated feelings toward him. Fletcher's eccentricities and absurdities, often just a hair away from complete foolishness but sometimes clever and always a silly reflection of his lifestyle, were oddly charming to Dickens. He appreciated the oddball humor, put up with everything else, and generously welcomed Kindheart into his home in both Italy and England over the next few years. Sadly, the end of this poor guy's life mirrored the ups and downs of his entire journey, but we’ll get to that later. Right now, he's ready to introduce Dickens to the Highlands.
CHAPTER XVI.
ADVENTURES IN THE HIGHLANDS.
1841.
From Loch Earn Head Dickens wrote on Monday, the 5th of July, having reached it, "wet through," at four that afternoon: "Having had a great deal to do in a crowded house on Saturday night at the theatre, we left Edinburgh yesterday morning at half-past seven, and traveled, with Fletcher for our guide, to a place called Stewart's Hotel, nine miles further than Callender. We had neglected to order rooms, and were obliged to make a sitting-room of our own bed-chamber; in which my genius for stowing furniture away was of the very greatest service. Fletcher slept in a kennel with three panes of glass in it, which formed part and parcel of a window; the other three panes whereof belonged to a man who slept on the other side[264] of the partition. He told me this morning that he had had a nightmare all night, and had screamed horribly, he knew. The stranger, as you may suppose, hired a gig and went off at full gallop with the first glimpse of daylight.[40] Being very tired (for we had not had more than three hours' sleep on the previous night) we lay till ten this morning, and at half-past eleven went through the Trossachs to Loch Katrine, where I walked from the hotel after tea last night. It is impossible to say what a glorious scene it was. It rained as it never does rain anywhere but here. We conveyed Kate up a rocky pass to go and see the island of the Lady of the Lake, but she gave in after the first five minutes, and[265] we left her, very picturesque and uncomfortable, with Tom" (the servant they had brought with them from Devonshire Terrace) "holding an umbrella over her head, while we climbed on. When we came back, she had gone into the carriage. We were wet through to the skin, and came on in that state four-and-twenty miles. Fletcher is very good-natured, and of extraordinary use in these outlandish parts. His habit of going into kitchens and bars, disconcerting at Broadstairs, is here of great service. Not expecting us till six, they hadn't lighted our fires when we arrived here; and if you had seen him (with whom the responsibility of the omission rested) running in and out of the sitting-room and the two bedrooms with a great pair of bellows, with which he distractedly blew each of the fires out in turn, you would have died of laughing. He had on his head a great Highland cap, on his back a white coat, and cut such a figure as even the inimitable can't depicter. . . .
From Loch Earn Head, Dickens wrote on Monday, the 5th of July, having arrived, "soaked to the skin," at four that afternoon: "After a busy night at the theater in a packed house on Saturday, we left Edinburgh yesterday morning at half-past seven, traveling with Fletcher as our guide to a place called Stewart's Hotel, which is nine miles beyond Callender. We forgot to book rooms in advance, so we had to turn our bedroom into a sitting room; my talent for squeezing furniture into tight spaces was incredibly helpful. Fletcher slept in a small kennel with three panes of glass, which was part of a window; the other three panes belonged to a guy on the other side of the wall. He told me this morning that he’d had a nightmare all night and probably screamed like crazy. As you can imagine, the stranger hired a carriage and took off at full speed as soon as it was light.[40] Being really tired (because we only got about three hours of sleep the night before), we stayed in bed until ten this morning, and at half-past eleven we went through the Trossachs to Loch Katrine, where I walked from the hotel after tea last night. It’s impossible to describe how stunning the scene was. It rained in a way that only happens here. We helped Kate up a rocky path to see the island of the Lady of the Lake, but she gave up after just five minutes, and we left her, looking picturesque but uncomfortable, with Tom" (the servant who came with them from Devonshire Terrace) "holding an umbrella over her head while we continued on. When we returned, she had gotten into the carriage. We were completely soaked and traveled twenty-four miles in that state. Fletcher is very good-natured and incredibly useful in these remote areas. His habit of going into kitchens and bars, which was awkward at Broadstairs, is a big help here. Not expecting us until six, they hadn’t lit our fires when we arrived; and if you had seen him (with whom the blame for the oversight lay) running back and forth between the sitting room and the two bedrooms with a big pair of bellows, frantically blowing each fire out in turn, you would have laughed your head off. He was wearing a large Highland cap on his head and a white coat on his back, looking like something even the greatest artist couldn’t capture. . . .
"The inns, inside and out, are the queerest places imaginable. From the road, this one," at Loch Earn Head, "looks like a white wall, with windows in it by mistake. We have a good sitting-room, though, on the first floor: as large (but not as lofty) as my study. The bedrooms are of that size which renders it impossible for you to move, after you have taken your boots off, without chipping pieces out of your legs. There isn't a basin in the Highlands which will hold my face; not a drawer which will open, after you have put your clothes in it; not a water-bottle capacious enough to wet your toothbrush. The huts are wretched and miserable beyond all description. The food (for those who can pay for it) 'not bad,' as M. would say: oat-cake,[266] mutton, hotch-potch, trout from the loch, small beer bottled, marmalade, and whiskey. Of the last-named article I have taken about a pint to-day. The weather is what they call 'soft'—which means that the sky is a vast water-spout that never leaves off emptying itself; and the liquor has no more effect than water. . . . I am going to work to-morrow, and hope before leaving here to write you again. The elections have been sad work indeed. That they should return Sibthorp and reject Bulwer, is, by Heaven, a national disgrace. . . . I don't wonder the devil flew over Lincoln. The people were far too addle-headed, even for him. . . . I don't bore you with accounts of Ben this and that, and Lochs of all sorts of names, but this is a wonderful region. The way the mists were stalking about to-day, and the clouds lying down upon the hills; the deep glens, the high rocks, the rushing waterfalls, and the roaring rivers down in deep gulfs below; were all stupendous. This house is wedged round by great heights that are lost in the clouds; and the loch, twelve miles long, stretches out its dreary length before the windows. In my next I shall soar to the sublime, perhaps; in this here present writing I confine myself to the ridiculous. But I am always," etc. etc.
"The inns, both inside and out, are the strangest places you can imagine. From the road, this one at Loch Earn Head looks like a white wall with some windows that seem like a mistake. We have a decent sitting room on the first floor that’s as big (but not as tall) as my study. The bedrooms are so tiny that once you take off your boots, it's nearly impossible to move without bumping into things. There isn’t a basin in the Highlands that can hold my face; not a drawer that will open after you put your clothes in it; not a water bottle big enough to rinse your toothbrush. The huts are wretched and miserable beyond belief. The food (for those who can afford it) is 'not bad,' as M. would put it: oat cakes, mutton, hotch-potch, trout from the loch, bottled small beer, marmalade, and whiskey. I've had about a pint of the last one today. The weather is what they call 'soft'—which means the sky is a giant water spout that never stops pouring; and the liquor feels no different than water. . . . I plan to work tomorrow and hope to write to you again before I leave. The elections have been quite a disappointment. It’s a national disgrace that they chose Sibthorp and rejected Bulwer. . . . I’m not surprised the devil flew over Lincoln. The people were way too confused, even for him. . . . I won't bore you with stories about Ben and all sorts of lochs, but this is an amazing area. The way the mists were moving around today, the clouds resting on the hills; the deep valleys, the tall rocks, the rushing waterfalls, and the roaring rivers below in steep gorges; it was all incredible. This house is surrounded by towering heights that disappear into the clouds; and the loch, twelve miles long, stretches out its dreary length right in front of the windows. In my next letter, I might aim for something grand, but for now, I’ll stick to the ridiculous. But I'm always," etc. etc.
His next letter bore the date of "Ballechelish, Friday evening, ninth July, 1841, half-past nine, p.m.," and described what we had often longed to see together, the Pass of Glencoe. . . . "I can't go to bed without writing to you from here, though the post will not leave this place until we have left it and arrived at another. On looking over the route which Lord Murray made out for me, I found he had put down Thursday[267] next for Abbotsford and Dryburgh Abbey, and a journey of seventy miles besides! Therefore, and as I was happily able to steal a march upon myself at Loch Earn Head, and to finish in two days what I thought would take me three, we shall leave here to-morrow morning; and, by being a day earlier than we intended at all the places between this and Melrose (which we propose to reach by Wednesday night), we shall have a whole day for Scott's house and tomb, and still be at York on Saturday evening, and home, God willing, on Sunday. . . . We left Loch Earn Head last night, and went to a place called Killin, eight miles from it, where we slept. I walked some six miles with Fletcher after we got there, to see a waterfall; and truly it was a magnificent sight, foaming and crashing down three great steeps of riven rock; leaping over the first as far off as you could carry your eye, and rumbling and foaming down into a dizzy pool below you, with a deafening roar. To-day we have had a journey of between 50 and 60 miles, through the bleakest and most desolate part of Scotland, where the hill-tops are still covered with great patches of snow, and the road winds over steep mountain-passes, and on the brink of deep brooks and precipices. The cold all day has been intense, and the rain sometimes most violent. It has been impossible to keep warm, by any means; even whiskey failed; the wind was too piercing even for that. One stage of ten miles, over a place called the Black Mount, took us two hours and a half to do; and when we came to a lone public called the King's House, at the entrance to Glencoe,—this was about three o'clock,—we were wellnigh frozen. We got a[268] fire directly, and in twenty minutes they served us up some famous kippered salmon, broiled; a broiled fowl; hot mutton ham and poached eggs; pancakes; oat-cake; wheaten bread; butter; bottled porter; hot water, lump sugar, and whiskey; of which we made a very hearty meal. All the way, the road had been among moors and mountains, with huge masses of rock, which fell down God knows where, sprinkling the ground in every direction, and giving it the aspect of the burial-place of a race of giants. Now and then we passed a hut or two, with neither window nor chimney, and the smoke of the peat fire rolling out at the door. But there were not six of these dwellings in a dozen miles; and anything so bleak and wild, and mighty in its loneliness, as the whole country, it is impossible to conceive. Glencoe itself is perfectly terrible. The pass is an awful place. It is shut in on each side by enormous rocks from which great torrents come rushing down in all directions. In amongst these rocks on one side of the pass (the left as we came) there are scores of glens, high up, which form such haunts as you might imagine yourself wandering in, in the very height and madness of a fever. They will live in my dreams for years—I was going to say as long as I live, and I seriously think so. The very recollection of them makes me shudder. . . . Well, I will not bore you with my impressions of these tremendous wilds, but they really are fearful in their grandeur and amazing solitude. Wales is a mere toy compared with them."
His next letter was dated "Ballechelish, Friday evening, July 9, 1841, 9:30 p.m.," and it described the Pass of Glencoe, something we had often wanted to see together. "I can't go to bed without writing to you from here, even though the post won't leave until we've moved on to another location. Looking over the route Lord Murray planned for me, I saw he had marked down Thursday for Abbotsford and Dryburgh Abbey, plus a journey of seventy miles! So, since I was lucky enough to get a jump on my plans at Loch Earn Head and finish in two days what I thought would take me three, we're leaving here tomorrow morning. By being a day ahead of schedule at all the stops between this and Melrose (which we aim to reach by Wednesday night), we will have a full day for Scott's house and tomb, and still make it to York by Saturday evening, and home, God willing, on Sunday. We left Loch Earn Head last night and went to a spot called Killin, eight miles away, where we spent the night. I walked about six miles with Fletcher after we arrived to see a waterfall; it was a stunning sight, cascading and crashing down three steep rock faces, leaping so far off you could barely see, rumbling and foaming into a dizzying pool below, with a deafening roar. Today we traveled between 50 and 60 miles through the bleakest and most desolate part of Scotland, where the hilltops still have large patches of snow, and the road winds over steep mountain passes and along deep rivers and cliffs. The cold has been intense all day, and the rain has occasionally been quite heavy. It was impossible to stay warm by any means; even whiskey couldn't help; the wind was too cutting for that. One ten-mile stretch over the Black Mount took us two and a half hours to complete, and when we reached a lonely inn called the King's House at the entrance to Glencoe—around three o'clock—we were nearly frozen. We quickly got a fire going, and within twenty minutes they served us some famous kippered salmon, a broiled chicken, hot mutton ham with poached eggs, pancakes, oat cakes, wheaten bread, butter, bottled porter, hot water, lump sugar, and whiskey; it made for a hearty meal. The whole way, the road was through moors and mountains, with huge rocks that seemed to have fallen from who knows where, scattered in all directions, giving the ground the look of a giant's graveyard. Here and there, we passed a hut or two, with no windows or chimneys, the smoke from the peat fire rolling out the door. But there were no more than six of these homes in a twelve-mile stretch; it’s hard to imagine a place so bleak, wild, and enormous in its solitude as this entire area. Glencoe itself is truly terrifying. The pass is an awful place, flanked on each side by enormous rocks from which torrents rush down in every direction. Tucked among these rocks on one side of the pass (the left as we approached) are many high glens that you might envision wandering through in the height of a fever’s madness. They'll haunt my dreams for years—I was going to say for as long as I live, and I honestly believe that. The very thought of them sends shivers down my spine. I won't bore you with my feelings about these incredible wilds, but they truly are awe-inspiring in their grandeur and amazing solitude. Wales is just a toy compared to them."
The further mention of his guide's whimsical ways may stand, for it cannot now be the possible occasion[269] of pain or annoyance, or of anything but very innocent laughter:
The further mention of his guide's quirky habits may remain, as it can no longer be the cause[269] of pain or annoyance, but only of very innocent laughter:
"We are now in a bare white house on the banks of Loch Leven, but in a comfortably-furnished room on the top of the house,—that is, on the first floor,—with the rain pattering against the window as though it were December, the wind howling dismally, a cold damp mist on everything without, a blazing fire within half way up the chimney, and a most infernal Piper practicing under the window for a competition of pipers which is to come off shortly. . . . The store of anecdotes of Fletcher with which we shall return will last a long time. It seems that the F.'s are an extensive clan, and that his father was a Highlander. Accordingly, wherever he goes, he finds out some cotter or small farmer who is his cousin. I wish you could see him walking into his cousins' curds and cream, and into their dairies generally! Yesterday morning, between eight and nine, I was sitting writing at the open window, when the postman came to the inn (which at Loch Earn Head is the post-office) for the letters. He is going away, when Fletcher, who has been writing somewhere below-stairs, rushes out, and cries, 'Halloa there! Is that the Post?' 'Yes!' somebody answers. 'Call him back!' says Fletcher: 'Just sit down till I've done, and don't go away till I tell you.'—Fancy! The General Post, with the letters of forty villages in a leathern bag! . . . To-morrow at Oban. Sunday at Inverary. Monday at Tarbet. Tuesday at Glasgow (and that night at Hamilton). Wednesday at Melrose. Thursday at ditto. Friday I don't know where. Saturday at York. Sunday—how glad I shall be to shake hands with you![270] My love to Mac. I thought he'd have written once. Ditto to Macready. I had a very nice and welcome letter from him, and a most hearty one from Elliotson. . . . P.S. Half asleep. So excuse drowsiness of matter and composition. I shall be full of joy to meet another letter from you! . . . P.P.S. They speak Gaelic here, of course, and many of the common people understand very little English. Since I wrote this letter, I rang the girl up-stairs, and gave elaborate directions (you know my way) for a pint of sherry to be made into boiling negus; mentioning all the ingredients one by one, and particularly nutmeg. When I had quite finished, seeing her obviously bewildered, I said, with great gravity, 'Now you know what you're going to order?' 'Oh, yes. Sure.' 'What?'—a pause—'Just'—another pause—'Just plenty of nutbergs!'"
"We are now in a plain white house by Loch Leven, but in a comfortably furnished room on the top floor, with rain pattering against the window as if it were December, the wind howling sadly, and a cold, damp mist covering everything outside, while a blazing fire crackles in the fireplace. Below the window, a pretty terrible piper is practicing for an upcoming competition. The stories about Fletcher we’ll take back will last quite a while. It turns out the F.’s are a big clan, and his father was a Highlander. So wherever he goes, he finds some remote farmer or cottage owner who is his cousin. I wish you could see him walking into his cousins' homes and their dairies! Yesterday morning, between eight and nine, I was sitting at the open window writing when the postman came to the inn (which serves as the post office at Loch Earn Head) for the letters. As he was leaving, Fletcher, who had been writing downstairs, rushed out and shouted, 'Hey! Is that the Post?' 'Yes!' someone replied. 'Call him back!' Fletcher said: 'Just sit down until I’m done, and don’t leave until I tell you.' Can you imagine? The General Post, with letters from forty villages in a leather bag! Tomorrow in Oban. Sunday in Inveraray. Monday in Tarbet. Tuesday in Glasgow (and that night in Hamilton). Wednesday in Melrose. Thursday in the same place. Friday I have no idea where. Saturday in York. Sunday— I’ll be so happy to shake your hand! My love to Mac. I thought he would have written back. Same to Macready. I got a very nice and welcoming letter from him, and a heartfelt one from Elliotson. P.S. Half asleep. So excuse the drowsiness in my writing and composition. I can’t wait to get another letter from you! P.P.S. They speak Gaelic here, of course, and many local people understand very little English. Since I wrote this letter, I called the girl upstairs and gave detailed instructions (you know how I am) for a pint of sherry to be made into boiling negus, mentioning each ingredient specifically, especially nutmeg. When I finished, noticing her confusion, I said seriously, 'Now you know what you’re going to order?' 'Oh, yes. Sure.' 'What?'—a pause—'Just'—another pause—'Just plenty of nutbergs!'"
The impression made upon him by the Pass of Glencoe was not overstated in this letter. It continued with him as he there expressed it; and as we shall see hereafter, even where he expected to find Nature in her most desolate grandeur on the dreary waste of an American prairie, his imagination went back with a higher satisfaction to Glencoe. But his experience of it is not yet completely told. The sequel was in a letter of two days' later date, from "Dalmally, Sunday, July the eleventh, 1841:"
The impact that the Pass of Glencoe had on him wasn't exaggerated in this letter. It stayed with him just as he described; and as we’ll see later, even when he anticipated encountering Nature in her most stark beauty on the bleak expanse of an American prairie, his thoughts returned to Glencoe with even greater appreciation. However, his experience of it isn't fully shared yet. The continuation was in a letter dated two days later, from "Dalmally, Sunday, July 11, 1841:"
"As there was no place of this name in our route, you will be surprised to see it at the head of this present writing. But our being here is a part of such moving accidents by flood and field as will astonish you. If you should happen to have your hat on, take it off, that your hair may stand on end without any interruption. To[271] get from Ballyhoolish (as I am obliged to spell it when Fletcher is not in the way; and he is out at this moment) to Oban, it is necessary to cross two ferries, one of which is an arm of the sea, eight or ten miles broad. Into this ferry-boat, passengers, carriages, horses, and all, get bodily, and are got across by hook or by crook if the weather be reasonably fine. Yesterday morning, however, it blew such a strong gale that the landlord of the inn, where we had paid for horses all the way to Oban (thirty miles), honestly came up-stairs just as we were starting, with the money in his hand, and told us it would be impossible to cross. There was nothing to be done but to come back five-and-thirty miles, through Glencoe and Inverouran, to a place called Tyndrum, whence a road twelve miles long crosses to Dalmally, which is sixteen miles from Inverary. Accordingly we turned back, and in a great storm of wind and rain began to retrace the dreary road we had come the day before. . . . I was not at all ill pleased to have to come again through that awful Glencoe. If it had been tremendous on the previous day, yesterday it was perfectly horrific. It had rained all night, and was raining then, as it only does in these parts. Through the whole glen, which is ten miles long, torrents were boiling and foaming, and sending up in every direction spray like the smoke of great fires. They were rushing down every hill and mountain side, and tearing like devils across the path, and down into the depths of the rocks. Some of the hills looked as if they were full of silver, and had cracked in a hundred places. Others as if they were frightened, and had broken out into a deadly sweat. In others there was no compromise or[272] division of streams, but one great torrent came roaring down with a deafening noise, and a rushing of water that was quite appalling. Such a spaet, in short (that's the country word), has not been known for many years, and the sights and sounds were beyond description. The post-boy was not at all at his ease, and the horses were very much frightened (as well they might be) by the perpetual raging and roaring; one of them started as we came down a steep place, and we were within that much (——) of tumbling over a precipice; just then, too, the drag broke, and we were obliged to go on as we best could, without it: getting out every now and then, and hanging on at the back of the carriage to prevent its rolling down too fast, and going Heaven knows where. Well, in this pleasant state of things we came to King's House again, having been four hours doing the sixteen miles. The rumble where Tom sat was by this time so full of water that he was obliged to borrow a gimlet and bore holes in the bottom to let it run out. The horses that were to take us on were out upon the hills, somewhere within ten miles round; and three or four bare-legged fellows went out to look for 'em, while we sat by the fire and tried to dry ourselves. At last we got off again (without the drag and with a broken spring, no smith living within ten miles), and went limping on to Inverouran. In the first three miles we were in a ditch and out again, and lost a horse's shoe. All this time it never once left off raining; and was very windy, very cold, very misty, and most intensely dismal. So we crossed the Black Mount, and came to a place we had passed the day before, where a rapid river runs over a bed of broken[273] rock. Now, this river, sir, had a bridge last winter, but the bridge broke down when the thaw came, and has never since been mended; so travelers cross upon a little platform, made of rough deal planks stretching from rock to rock; and carriages and horses ford the water, at a certain point. As the platform is the reverse of steady (we had proved this the day before), is very slippery, and affords anything but a pleasant footing, having only a trembling little rail on one side, and on the other nothing between it and the foaming stream, Kate decided to remain in the carriage, and trust herself to the wheels rather than to her feet. Fletcher and I had got out, and it was going away, when I advised her, as I had done several times before, to come with us; for I saw that the water was very high, the current being greatly swollen by the rain, and that the post-boy had been eyeing it in a very disconcerted manner for the last half-hour. This decided her to come out; and Fletcher, she, Tom, and I, began to cross, while the carriage went about a quarter of a mile down the bank, in search of a shallow place. The platform shook so much that we could only come across two at a time, and then it felt as if it were hung on springs. As to the wind and rain! . . . well, put into one gust all the wind and rain you ever saw and heard, and you'll have some faint notion of it! When we got safely to the opposite bank, there came riding up a wild Highlander, in a great plaid, whom we recognized as the landlord of the inn, and who, without taking the least notice of us, went dashing on,—with the plaid he was wrapped in, streaming in the wind,—screeching in Gaelic to the post-boy on the opposite bank,[274] and making the most frantic gestures you ever saw, in which he was joined by some other wild man on foot, who had come across by a short cut, knee-deep in mire and water. As we began to see what this meant, we (that is, Fletcher and I) scrambled on after them, while the boy, horses, and carriage were plunging in the water, which left only the horses' heads and the boy's body visible. By the time we got up to them, the man on horseback and the men on foot were perfectly mad with pantomime; for as to any of their shouts being heard by the boy, the water made such a great noise that they might as well have been dumb. It made me quite sick to think how I should have felt if Kate had been inside. The carriage went round and round like a great stone, the boy was as pale as death, the horses were struggling and plashing and snorting like sea-animals, and we were all roaring to the driver to throw himself off and let them and the coach go to the devil, when suddenly it came all right (having got into shallow water), and, all tumbling and dripping and jogging from side to side, climbed up to the dry land. I assure you we looked rather queer, as we wiped our faces and stared at each other in a little cluster round about it. It seemed that the man on horseback had been looking at us through a telescope as we came to the track, and knowing that the place was very dangerous, and seeing that we meant to bring the carriage, had come on at a great gallop to show the driver the only place where he could cross. By the time he came up, the man had taken the water at a wrong place, and in a word was as nearly drowned (with carriage, horses, luggage, and all) as ever man was. Was this a good adventure?[275]
"As there was no place with this name on our route, you'll be surprised to see it at the beginning of this writing. But our presence here is part of such surprising events caused by floods and unexpected journeys that will amaze you. If you're wearing a hat, take it off so your hair can stand on end without any distractions. To[271]get from Ballyhoolish (which I have to spell out when Fletcher isn't around; and he’s out right now) to Oban, we need to cross two ferries, one of which is an arm of the sea, eight or ten miles wide. Passengers, vehicles, horses, and everything else end up in the ferry boat and are ferried across by any means possible if the weather is decent. However, yesterday morning, it was so windy that the innkeeper, where we had already paid for horses all the way to Oban (thirty miles), honestly came upstairs just as we were getting ready to leave, with the money in hand, and told us it would be impossible to cross. There was nothing to do but go back thirty-five miles, through Glencoe and Inverouran, to a place called Tyndrum, where a twelve-mile road leads to Dalmally, which is sixteen miles from Inverary. So we turned back and started retracing the miserable road we had traveled the day before through a fierce storm of wind and rain. I was actually quite pleased to pass through that terrifying Glencoe again. If it had been overwhelming the day before, yesterday it was absolutely horrific. It rained all night and continued to rain, as it often does in these parts. Throughout the entire glen, which is ten miles long, torrents surged and churned, sending spray in every direction like smoke from huge fires. They rushed down every hill and mountainside, tearing across the path, and plunging into the rocks below. Some hills looked as if they were filled with silver and had cracked in many places. Others looked like they were terrified, breaking out in a cold sweat. In certain areas, there was no division of streams; instead, one massive torrent roared down with a deafening noise and a ferocious flow of water that was genuinely alarming. Such a spaet (that’s the local term), in short, hasn’t been seen in many years, and the sights and sounds were indescribable. The post-boy was clearly uneasy, and the horses were very frightened (which was understandable) by the constant raging and roaring; one of them bolted as we descended a steep slope, and we came this close (——) to tumbling over a precipice; just then, the drag broke, and we were forced to continue as best we could without it: getting out now and then, and hanging onto the back of the carriage to keep it from rolling down too fast and going who knows where. In this delightful situation, we arrived back at King's House, having taken four hours to cover sixteen miles. The place where Tom was sitting was so filled with water by this point that he had to borrow a gimlet and drill holes in the bottom to let it drain out. The horses meant to take us further were somewhere on the hills, within ten miles, and three or four bare-legged guys went out to look for them while we sat by the fire trying to dry off. Finally, we set off again (without the drag and with a broken spring, with no blacksmith within ten miles), and limped on to Inverouran. In the first three miles, we ended up in a ditch and back out again, and lost a horse's shoe. Throughout this time, it didn’t stop raining once; it was very windy, very cold, very misty, and incredibly gloomy. So we crossed the Black Mount and arrived at a spot we had passed the day before, where a rapidly flowing river cascades over a bed of broken[273]rock. Now, this river, sir, had a bridge last winter, but the bridge collapsed during the thaw and hasn’t been repaired since; so travelers cross on a small platform made of rough wooden planks that stretch from rock to rock, and vehicles and horses ford the water at a certain point. Since the platform was quite unstable (we had proven this the day before), very slippery, and offered anything but a secure footing, with only a shaky little rail on one side, and nothing but a foaming stream on the other, Kate decided to stay in the carriage and trust the wheels rather than her feet. Fletcher and I had gotten out, and as the carriage was moving away, I advised her, as I had done several times before, to join us; I saw that the water was very high, the current swollen from the rain, and the post-boy had been eyeing it with great concern for the last half hour. This prompted her to come out; and Fletcher, she, Tom, and I started to cross, while the carriage moved about a quarter of a mile downriver in search of a shallower area. The platform shook so much that we could only cross two at a time, and it felt as if it were suspended on springs. As for the wind and rain! … well, just imagine all the wind and rain you’ve ever experienced, and put it into one gust, and you’ll have a slight idea of it! When we finally made it to the other bank, a wild Highlander in a large plaid rode up, whom we recognized as the innkeeper, and who, without acknowledging us, dashed on—his plaid streaming in the wind—screaming in Gaelic to the post-boy on the opposite bank,[274]making the most frantic gestures you could ever imagine, joined by another wild man on foot who had come across by a shortcut, knee-deep in mud and water. As we started to understand what this meant, we (that is, Fletcher and I) scrambled after them, while the boy, horses, and carriage plunged into the water, leaving only the horses' heads and the boy's body above the surface. By the time we caught up with them, the man on horseback and the men on foot were completely frantic with gestures because none of their shouts could be heard by the boy; the noise of the water was so overwhelming that they might as well have been silent. I felt quite sick picturing how I would feel if Kate had been inside. The carriage whirled round like a great stone, the boy looked pale as a ghost, the horses were struggling and splashing and snorting like sea creatures, and we were all shouting at the driver to leap off and let the horses and the carriage go to hell, when suddenly everything worked out (having gotten into shallower water), and tumbling and dripping and jolting from side to side, they climbed up onto dry land. I assure you we looked quite odd as we wiped our faces and stared at each other in a little group around it. It turned out that the man on horseback had been watching us through a telescope as we approached the track, and knowing that the area was very dangerous, and seeing that we were determined to bring the carriage, had galloped over to show the driver the only safe place to cross. By the time he reached us, the man had attempted to cross at the wrong place, and was as close to drowning (along with the carriage, horses, luggage, and all) as anyone could be. Was this a good adventure?[275]
"We all went on to the inn,—the wild man galloping on first, to get a fire lighted,—and there we dined on eggs and bacon, oat-cake, and whiskey; and changed and dried ourselves. The place was a mere knot of little outhouses, and in one of these there were fifty Highlanders all drunk. . . . Some were drovers, some pipers, and some workmen engaged to build a hunting-lodge for Lord Breadalbane hard by, who had been driven in by stress of weather. One was a paper-hanger. He had come out three days before to paper the inn's best room, a chamber almost large enough to keep a Newfoundland dog in, and, from the first half-hour after his arrival to that moment, had been hopelessly and irreclaimably drunk. They were lying about in all directions: on forms, on the ground, about a loft overhead, round the turf-fire wrapped in plaids, on the tables, and under them. We paid our bill, thanked our host very heartily, gave some money to his children, and after an hour's rest came on again. At ten o'clock at night we reached this place, and were overjoyed to find quite an English inn, with good beds (those we have slept on, yet, have always been of straw), and every possible comfort. We breakfasted this morning at half-past ten, and at three go on to Inverary to dinner. I believe the very rough part of the journey is over, and I am really glad of it. Kate sends all kind of regards. I shall hope to find a letter from you at Inverary when the post reaches there, to-morrow. I wrote to Oban yesterday, desiring the post-office keeper to send any he might have for us, over to that place. Love to Mac."
"We all headed to the inn—the wild man took off first to get a fire started—and we had dinner with eggs and bacon, oat-cake, and whiskey; then we changed and dried off. The place was just a cluster of small outbuildings, and in one of these, there were fifty Highlanders completely drunk. Some were drovers, some pipers, and some were workers hired to build a hunting lodge for Lord Breadalbane nearby, who had been forced in by the bad weather. One was a wallpaper hanger. He had come out three days before to wallpaper the inn's best room, a room almost big enough to fit a Newfoundland dog, and from the first half-hour after he arrived until that moment, he had been hopelessly and irretrievably drunk. They were sprawled out in every direction: on benches, on the ground, in a loft above, around the turf fire wrapped in blankets, on the tables, and under them. We settled our bill, thanked our host sincerely, gave some money to his kids, and after resting for an hour, we moved on. By ten o'clock at night, we reached this place and were thrilled to find a proper English inn, with good beds (the ones we've slept on so far have all been straw), and every possible comfort. We had breakfast this morning at half-past ten, and at three, we’re heading to Inverary for dinner. I believe the toughest part of the journey is behind us, and I'm really glad about it. Kate sends all kinds of regards. I hope to find a letter from you at Inverary when the post arrives there tomorrow. I wrote to Oban yesterday, asking the post office keeper to send any mail he might have for us over to that place. Love to Mac."
One more letter, brief, but overflowing at every[276] word with his generous nature, must close the delightful series written from Scotland. It was dated from Inverary the day following his exciting adventure; promised me another from Melrose (which has unfortunately not been kept with the rest); and inclosed the invitation to a public dinner at Glasgow. "I have returned for answer that I am on my way home, on pressing business connected with my weekly publication, and can't stop. But I have offered to come down any day in September or October, and accept the honor then. Now, I shall come and return per mail; and, if this suits them, enter into a solemn league and covenant to come with me. Do. You must. I am sure you will. . . . Till my next, and always afterwards, God bless you. I got your welcome letter this morning, and have read it a hundred times. What a pleasure it is! Kate's best regards. I am dying for Sunday, and wouldn't stop now for twenty dinners of twenty thousand each.
One more letter, short but filled with his generous spirit at every[276] word, wraps up the delightful series written from Scotland. It was sent from Inverary the day after his thrilling adventure; he promised me another from Melrose (which, unfortunately, isn't with the rest); and included an invitation to a public dinner in Glasgow. "I replied that I'm on my way home due to pressing business related to my weekly publication, and I can't stop. But I've offered to come down any day in September or October and accept the honor then. Now, I'll send this back by mail; and if it works for them, I'll make a serious commitment to come with me. Do. You must. I’m sure you will. . . . Until my next letter, and always after that, God bless you. I got your lovely letter this morning and have read it a hundred times. What a joy it is! Kate sends her best regards. I can't wait for Sunday, and I wouldn't stop now for twenty dinners worth twenty thousand each.

"Will Lord John meet the Parliament, or resign first?" I agreed to accompany him to Glasgow; but illness intercepted that celebration.
"Will Lord John meet with Parliament, or resign first?" I agreed to go with him to Glasgow; but illness got in the way of that celebration.
CHAPTER XVII.
AGAIN AT BROADSTAIRS.
1841.
Soon after his return, at the opening of August, he went to Broadstairs; and the direction in which that last question shows his thoughts to have been busy was that to which he turned his first holiday leisure. He sent me some rhymed squibs as his anonymous contribution to the fight the Liberals were then making against what was believed to be intended by the return to office of the Tories; ignorant as we were how much wiser than his party the statesman then at the head of it was, or how greatly what we all most desired would be advanced by the very success that had been most disheartening. There will be no harm now in giving one of these pieces, which will sufficiently show the tone of all of them, and with what a hearty relish they were written. I doubt indeed if he ever enjoyed anything more than the power of thus taking part occasionally, unknown to outsiders, in the sharp conflict[278] the press was waging at the time. "By Jove, how radical I am getting!" he wrote to me (13th August). "I wax stronger and stronger in the true principles every day. I don't know whether it's the sea, or no, but so it is." He would at times even talk, in moments of sudden indignation at the political outlook, of carrying off himself and his household gods, like Coriolanus, to a world elsewhere! "Thank God there is a Van Diemen's Land. That's my comfort. Now, I wonder if I should make a good settler! I wonder, if I went to a new colony with my head, hands, legs, and health, I should force myself to the top of the social milk-pot and live upon the cream! What do you think? Upon my word, I believe I should."
Soon after he got back, at the beginning of August, he went to Broadstairs; and the topic that his last question indicated was what he focused on during his first holiday break. He sent me some witty poems as his anonymous contribution to the fight the Liberals were then engaged in against what was thought to be the intention behind the Tories returning to power; we were unaware of how much smarter the politician leading them was compared to his party, or how much our greatest hopes would actually be advanced by the very success that felt so discouraging. It’s fine now to share one of these pieces, which will clearly show the tone of all of them, and how passionately they were written. I truly doubt he ever enjoyed anything more than the chance to occasionally be involved, unnoticed by outsiders, in the intense struggle the press was having at the time. "By Jove, how radical I’m getting!" he wrote to me (13th August). "I’m getting stronger in the true principles every day. I don’t know if it’s the sea or what, but that’s how it is." Sometimes he would even talk, in moments of sudden frustration with the political situation, about taking himself and his household goods, like Coriolanus, to another world! "Thank God there’s a Van Diemen's Land. That’s my comfort. I wonder if I’d be a good settler! If I moved to a new colony with my brain, hands, legs, and good health, would I work my way to the top of the social ladder and live off the best? What do you think? Honestly, I believe I would."
His political squibs during the Tory interregnum comprised some capital subjects for pictures after the manner of Peter Pindar; but that which I select has no touch of personal satire in it, and he would himself, for that reason, have least objected to its revival. Thus ran his new version of "The Fine Old English Gentleman, to be said or sung at all conservative dinners:"
His political jabs during the Tory interregnum included some great topics for illustrations in the style of Peter Pindar; however, the one I choose doesn't have any personal satire in it, and he would probably have had the least objection to it being brought back. Here’s his new take on "The Fine Old English Gentleman, to be said or sung at all conservative dinners:"
I'll sing you a new ballad, and I'll warrant it first-rate,
Of the days of that old gentleman who had that old estate;
When they spent the public money at a bountiful old rate
On ev'ry mistress, pimp, and scamp, at ev'ry noble gate.
Back in the good old days of the English Tories;
Soon they'll be back!
The good old laws were garnished well with gibbets, whips, and chains,
With fine old English penalties, and fine old English pains,
With rebel heads and seas of blood once hot in rebel veins;
For all these things were requisite to guard the rich old gains
From the good old English Tory days;
[279]Soon they'll be back!
This brave old code, like Argus, had a hundred watchful eyes,
And ev'ry English peasant had his good old English spies,
To tempt his starving discontent with fine old English lies,
Then call the good old Yeomanry to stop his peevish cries,
During the traditional Tory era in England;
Soon they will return!
The good old times for cutting throats that cried out in their need,
The good old times for hunting men who held their fathers' creed,
The good old times when William Pitt, as all good men agreed,
Came down direct from Paradise at more than railroad speed. . . .
Oh, the good old English Tory days;
When will they return?
In those rare days, the press was seldom known to snarl or bark,
But sweetly sang of men in pow'r, like any tuneful lark;
Grave judges, too, to all their evil deeds were in the dark;
And not a man in twenty score knew how to make his mark.
Oh, the great old English Tory days;
They will be back soon! . . .
But tolerance, though slow in flight, is strong-wing'd in the main;
That night must come on these fine days, in course of time was plain;
The pure old spirit struggled, but its struggles were in vain;
A nation's grip was on it, and it died in choking pain,
Back in the good old days of the English Tory party,
All of the old days.
The bright old day now dawns again; the cry runs through the land,
In England there shall be—dear bread! in Ireland—sword and brand!
And poverty, and ignorance, shall swell the rich and grand,
So, rally round the rulers with the gentle iron hand
Of the good old English Tory days;
Hail to the future!
Of matters in which he had been specially interested before he quitted London, one or two may properly be named. He had always sympathized, almost as strongly as Archbishop Whately did, with Dr. Elliotson's mesmeric[280] investigations; and, reinforced as these were in the present year by the displays of a Belgian youth whom another friend, Mr. Chauncy Hare Townshend, brought over to England, the subject, which to the last had an attraction for him, was for the time rather ardently followed up. The improvement during the last few years in the London prisons was another matter of eager and pleased inquiry with him; and he took frequent means of stating what in this respect had been done, since even the date when his Sketches were written, by two most efficient public officers at Clerkenwell and Tothill Fields, Mr. Chesterton and Lieutenant Tracey, whom the course of these inquiries turned into private friends. His last letter to me before he quitted town sufficiently explains itself. "Slow rises worth by poverty deprest" was the thought in his mind at every part of his career, and he never for a moment was unmindful of the duty it imposed upon him: "I subscribed for a couple of copies" (31st July) "of this little book. I knew nothing of the man, but he wrote me a very modest letter of two lines, some weeks ago. I have been much affected by the little biography at the beginning, and I thought you would like to share the emotion it had raised in me. I wish we were all in Eden again—for the sake of these toiling creatures."
Of the matters he had been particularly interested in before leaving London, a couple can be mentioned. He always empathized, almost as strongly as Archbishop Whately, with Dr. Elliotson's work on mesmerism[280]; and this year, it was further energized by the demonstrations of a Belgian youth that another friend, Mr. Chauncy Hare Townshend, brought to England. The topic, which had always intrigued him, was passionately pursued for a time. The improvements in London prisons over the last few years were another area he eagerly explored; he frequently highlighted the advancements made since the publication of his Sketches by two highly effective public officials at Clerkenwell and Tothill Fields—Mr. Chesterton and Lieutenant Tracey—who became private friends through the course of these inquiries. His last letter to me before leaving town is self-explanatory. "Slow rises worth by poverty depressed" was the thought that accompanied him throughout his career, and he was always mindful of the responsibility it entailed: "I subscribed for a couple of copies" (31st July) "of this little book. I knew nothing about the author, but he sent me a very humble two-line letter a few weeks ago. I was deeply moved by the brief biography at the start, and I thought you would like to share in the emotions it stirred in me. I wish we could all be back in Eden again—for the sake of these struggling individuals."
In the middle of August (Monday, 16th) I had announcement that he was coming up for special purposes: "I sit down to write to you without an atom of news to communicate. Yes, I have,—something that will surprise you, who are pent up in dark and dismal Lincoln's Inn Fields. It is the brightest day you ever saw. The sun is sparkling on the water so that I can hardly[281] bear to look at it. The tide is in, and the fishing-boats are dancing like mad. Upon the green-topped cliffs the corn is cut and piled in shocks; and thousands of butterflies are fluttering about, taking the bright little red flags at the mast-heads for flowers, and panting with delight accordingly. [Here the Inimitable, unable to resist the brilliancy out of doors, breaketh off, rusheth to the machines, and plungeth into the sea. Returning, he proceedeth:] Jeffrey is just as he was when he wrote the letter I sent you. No better, and no worse. I had a letter from Napier on Saturday, urging the children's-labor subject upon me. But, as I hear from Southwood Smith that the report cannot be printed until the new Parliament has sat at the least six weeks, it will be impossible to produce it before the January number. I shall be in town on Saturday morning and go straight to you. A letter has come from little Hall begging that when I do come to town I will dine there, as they wish to talk about the new story. I have written to say that I will do so on Saturday, and we will go together; but I shall be by no means good company. . . . I have more than half a mind to start a bookseller of my own. I could; with good capital too, as you know; and ready to spend it. G. Varden beware!"
In the middle of August (Monday, 16th), I got the news that he was coming up for special reasons: "I’m sitting down to write to you without a single update to share. Actually, I do have something that will surprise you, stuck in the dark and gloomy Lincoln's Inn Fields. It’s the brightest day you’ve ever seen. The sun is sparkling on the water so much that I can barely[281] look at it. The tide is in, and the fishing boats are bouncing around like crazy. On the green-topped cliffs, the corn is cut and stacked in shocks, and thousands of butterflies are fluttering around, mistaking the bright little red flags at the mastheads for flowers, and happily buzzing about. [Here the Inimitable, unable to resist the brilliance outside, breaks off, rushes to the machines, and plunges into the sea. When he returns, he continues:] Jeffrey is just the same as he was when he wrote the letter I sent you. No better, no worse. I got a letter from Napier on Saturday, pushing the children’s labor issue on me. But since I hear from Southwood Smith that the report can’t be published until the new Parliament has been sitting for at least six weeks, it won’t be possible to release it before the January issue. I’ll be in town on Saturday morning and will head straight to you. A letter has come from little Hall asking that when I do come to town, I’ll have dinner there, as they want to discuss the new story. I’ve written to say I’ll do that on Saturday, and we can go together; but I won’t be much fun to talk to. . . . I’m seriously considering starting my own bookstore. I could, with good funding too, as you know, and I’m ready to spend it. G. Varden, watch out!"
Small causes of displeasure had been growing out of the Clock, and were almost unavoidably incident to the position in which he found himself respecting it. Its discontinuance had become necessary, the strain upon himself being too great without the help from others which experience had shown to be impracticable; but I thought he had not met the difficulty wisely by undertaking,[282] which already he had done, to begin a new story so early as the following March. On his arrival, therefore, we decided on another plan, with which we went armed that Saturday afternoon to his publishers, and of which the result will be best told by himself. He had returned to Broadstairs the following morning, and next day (Monday, the 23d of August) he wrote to me in very enthusiastic terms of the share I had taken in what he calls "the development on Saturday afternoon; when I thought Chapman very manly and sensible, Hall morally and physically feeble though perfectly well intentioned, and both the statement and reception of the project quite triumphant. Didn't you think so too?" A fortnight later, Tuesday, the 7th of September, the agreement was signed in my chambers, and its terms were to the effect following. The Clock was to cease with the close of Barnaby Rudge, the respective ownerships continuing as provided; and the new work in twenty numbers, similar to those of Pickwick and Nickleby, was not to begin until after an interval of twelve months, in November, 1842. During its publication he was to receive two hundred pounds monthly, to be accounted as part of the expenses; for all which, and all risks incident, the publishers made themselves responsible, under conditions the same as in the Clock agreement; except that out of the profits of each number they were to have only a fourth, three-fourths going to him, and this arrangement was to hold good until the termination of six months from the completed book, when, upon payment to him of a fourth of the value of all existing stock, they were to have half the future interest. During the twelve months' interval before the[283] book began, he was to be paid one hundred and fifty pounds each month; but this was to be drawn from his three-fourths of the profits, and in no way to interfere with the monthly payments of two hundred pounds while the publication was going on.[41] Such was the "project," excepting only a provision to be mentioned hereafter against the improbable event of the profits being inadequate to the repayment; and my only drawback from the satisfaction of my own share in it arose from my fear of the use he was likely to make of the leisure it afforded him.
Small annoyances had been building up regarding the Clock, which were almost unavoidable given his situation with it. It had become necessary to discontinue it, as the pressure on him was too much without support from others, which experience had shown to be unrealistic; however, I thought he hadn't handled the challenge wisely by choosing to start a new story as early as the following March. Therefore, when he arrived, we decided on another plan, which we took to his publishers that Saturday afternoon, and the outcome is best described by him. He returned to Broadstairs the next morning, and the day after (Monday, August 23rd), he wrote to me enthusiastically about my involvement in what he called "the development on Saturday afternoon; when I thought Chapman was very strong and sensible, Hall somewhat weak both morally and physically but well-meaning, and the proposal and its reception quite successful. Didn't you think so too?" Two weeks later, on Tuesday, September 7th, the agreement was signed in my office, and its terms were as follows. The Clock was to end with Barnaby Rudge, with ownership rights continuing as stated; and the new work, in twenty installments like Pickwick and Nickleby, would not begin until after a twelve-month break, in November 1842. During its publication, he was to receive two hundred pounds a month, treated as part of the expenses; for all of this, and related risks, the publishers would take on responsibility, with conditions similar to the Clock agreement; except that they would only take a quarter of the profits from each installment, with him receiving three-quarters, and this setup would remain until six months after the book was completed, when, on paying him a quarter of the value of all existing stock, they would acquire half of the future profits. During the twelve months before the book started, he was to receive one hundred and fifty pounds per month; but this would come from his three-quarters of the profits and would not affect the two hundred pounds monthly payments during publication.[41] That was the "project," with only a provision to be mentioned later regarding the unlikely situation where profits fell short of the repayment; and my only concern with my own involvement in it was my worry about how he might use the free time it provided him.
That this fear was not ill founded appeared at the close of the next note I had from him: "There's no news" (13th September) "since my last. We are going to dine with Rogers to-day, and with Lady Essex, who is also here. Rogers is much pleased with Lord Ashley, who was offered by Peel a post in the government, but resolutely refused to take office unless Peel pledged himself to factory-improvement. Peel 'hadn't made up his mind,' and Lord Ashley was deaf to all other inducements, though they must have been very tempting. Much do I honor him for it. I am in an exquisitely lazy state, bathing, walking, reading, lying in the sun, doing everything but working. This frame of mind is superinduced by the prospect of rest, and the promising arrangements which I owe to you. I am still haunted by visions of America night and day. To miss this opportunity would be a sad thing. Kate cries dismally if I mention the subject. But, God willing, I think it must be managed somehow!"
That this fear was not unfounded became clear at the end of the next note I got from him: "There's no news" (13th September) "since my last. We're going to have dinner with Rogers today, and with Lady Essex, who's also here. Rogers is really happy with Lord Ashley, who was offered a government position by Peel, but firmly refused to take it unless Peel committed to improving factories. Peel 'hadn't made up his mind,' and Lord Ashley ignored all other tempting offers. I really admire him for that. I'm in a wonderfully lazy mood, swimming, walking, reading, lying in the sun, doing everything but working. This state of mind is brought on by the promise of rest and the great plans that I owe to you. I'm still haunted by thoughts of America day and night. Missing this opportunity would be disappointing. Kate gets really upset if I bring it up. But, God willing, I think it must be arranged somehow!"
CHAPTER XVIII.
EVE OF THE VISIT TO AMERICA.
1841.
The notion of America was in his mind, as we have seen, when he first projected the Clock; and a very hearty letter from Washington Irving about Little Nell and the Curiosity Shop, expressing the delight with his writings and the yearnings to himself which had indeed been pouring in upon him for some time from every part of the States, had very strongly revived it. He answered Irving with more than his own warmth: unable to thank him enough for his cordial and generous praise, or to tell him what lasting gratification it had given. "I wish I could find in your welcome letter," he added, "some hint of an intention to visit England. I should love to go with you, as I have gone, God knows how often, into Little Britain, and Eastcheap, and Green Arbor Court, and Westminster Abbey. . . . It would gladden my heart to compare notes with you about all[285] those delightful places and people that I used to walk about and dream of in the daytime, when a very small and not-over-particularly-taken-care-of boy." After interchange of these letters the subject was frequently revived; upon his return from Scotland it began to take shape as a thing that somehow or other, at no very distant date, must be; and at last, near the end of a letter filled with many unimportant things, the announcement, doubly underlined, came to me.
The idea of America was in his thoughts, as we've seen, when he first came up with the Clock; and a really heartfelt letter from Washington Irving about Little Nell and the Curiosity Shop, expressing his enjoyment of the writings and the longing he felt, which had indeed been pouring in from all over the States for some time, had reignited that notion. He replied to Irving with even more enthusiasm: unable to thank him enough for his warm and generous praise, or to convey the lasting joy it had brought him. "I wish I could find in your welcoming letter," he added, "some hint that you plan to visit England. I would love to go with you, just like I have so many times, God knows how often, into Little Britain, and Eastcheap, and Green Arbor Court, and Westminster Abbey. . . . It would make me really happy to share memories with you about all[285] those wonderful places and people that I used to wander around and daydream about when I was a very small boy who wasn’t particularly well taken care of." After exchanging these letters, the topic often came back up; upon his return from Scotland, it started to feel like something that somehow, before too long, had to happen; and finally, near the end of a letter filled with many trivial things, the announcement, doubly underlined, came to me.
The decision once taken, he was in his usual fever until its difficulties were disposed of. The objections to separation from the children led at first to the notion of taking them, but this was as quickly abandoned; and what remained to be overcome yielded readily to the kind offices of Macready, the offer of whose home to the little ones during the time of absence, though not accepted to the full extent, gave yet the assurance needed to quiet natural apprehensions. All this, including an arrangement for publication of such notes as might occur to him on the journey, took but a few days; and I was reading in my chambers a letter he had written the previous day from Broadstairs, when a note from him reached me, written that morning in London, to tell me he was on his way to take share of my breakfast. He had come overland by Canterbury after posting his first letter, had seen Macready the previous night, and had completed some part of the arrangements. This mode of rapid procedure was characteristic of him at all similar times, and will appear in the few following extracts from his letters:
Once he made the decision, he was in his usual frenzied state until he dealt with the challenges. Initially, the objections to separating from the kids led him to consider taking them along, but that idea was quickly dropped. What remained to be resolved was easily managed thanks to Macready, who offered to take care of the kids while he was away. Although the offer wasn't fully accepted, it provided the reassurance needed to calm their natural worries. All of this, including planning for the publication of any notes he might write during the trip, took just a few days. I was reading a letter he wrote the day before from Broadstairs when I received a note from him that morning in London, saying he was on his way to join me for breakfast. He had traveled overland via Canterbury after mailing his first letter, met with Macready the night before, and completed some of the arrangements. This fast-paced approach was typical for him in similar situations and will be evident in the few following extracts from his letters:
"Now" (19th September) "to astonish you. After balancing, considering, and weighing the matter in[286] every point of view, I have made up my mind (with God's leave) to go to America—and to start as soon after Christmas as it will be safe to go." Further information was promised immediately; and a request followed, characteristic as any he could have added to his design of traveling so far away, that we should visit once more together the scenes of his boyhood. "On the ninth of October we leave here. It's a Saturday. If it should be fine dry weather, or anything like it, will you meet us at Rochester, and stop there two or three days to see all the lions in the surrounding country? Think of this. . . . If you'll arrange to come, I'll have the carriage down, and Topping; and, supposing news from Glasgow don't interfere with us, which I fervently hope it will not, I will insure that we have much enjoyment."
"Now" (September 19) "to surprise you. After thinking it over from every angle, [286] I have decided (with God's permission) to go to America—and to leave as soon after Christmas as it’s safe to do so." More details were promised soon, and he made a request, typical of his desire to travel so far, that we would revisit the places of his childhood together. "On October ninth, we're leaving here. It's a Saturday. If the weather is nice, could you meet us in Rochester and stay there for two or three days to see all the attractions in the area? Think about it. . . . If you can make arrangements to come, I’ll have the carriage ready, along with Topping; and as long as nothing from Glasgow gets in our way, which I'm really hoping doesn’t happen, I’ll make sure we have a great time."
Three days later than that which announced his resolve, the subject was resumed: "I wrote to Chapman & Hall asking them what they thought of it, and saying I meant to keep a note-book, and publish it for half a guinea or thereabouts, on my return. They instantly sent the warmest possible reply, and said they had taken it for granted I would go, and had been speaking of it only the day before. I have begged them to make every inquiry about the fares, cabins, berths, and times of sailing; and I shall make a great effort to take Kate and the children. In that case I shall try to let the house furnished, for six months (for I shall remain that time in America); and if I succeed, the rent will nearly pay the expenses out, and home. I have heard of family cabins at £100; and I think one of these is large enough to hold us all. A single fare,[287] I think, is forty guineas. I fear I could not be happy if we had the Atlantic between us; but leaving them in New York while I ran off a thousand miles or so, would be quite another thing. If I can arrange all my plans before publishing the Clock address, I shall state therein that I am going: which will be no unimportant consideration, as affording the best possible reason for a long delay. How I am to get on without you for seven or eight months, I cannot, upon my soul, conceive. I dread to think of breaking up all our old happy habits for so long a time. The advantages of going, however, appear by steady looking-at so great, that I have come to persuade myself it is a matter of imperative necessity. Kate weeps whenever it is spoken of. Washington Irving has got a nasty low fever. I heard from him a day or two ago."
Three days later than when he announced his decision, the topic came up again: "I wrote to Chapman & Hall asking what they thought about it and mentioned that I planned to keep a notebook and publish it for about half a guinea when I return. They quickly sent back a very warm response, saying they assumed I would go and had been discussing it just the day before. I've asked them to look into the fares, cabins, berths, and sailing times; and I will make a strong effort to take Kate and the kids. If that happens, I'll try to rent the house furnished for six months (since I'll be in America that long); and if I succeed, the rent will nearly cover the costs of the trip there and back. I have heard about family cabins for £100; and I think one of those is big enough for all of us. A single fare, [287] I believe, is forty guineas. I’m afraid I couldn't be happy with the Atlantic Ocean between us; but leaving them in New York while I travel a thousand miles or so would be a completely different story. If I can sort out all my plans before I publish the Clock address, I'll mention in it that I am going: which will be a significant reason for a long delay. I truly can't imagine how I'll manage without you for seven or eight months. I dread the thought of disrupting all our old happy routines for such a long time. However, the benefits of going seem, upon careful consideration, to be so great that I’ve convinced myself it’s absolutely necessary. Kate cries every time it’s mentioned. Washington Irving has come down with a nasty low fever. I heard from him a day or two ago."
His next letter was the unexpected arrival which came by hand from Devonshire Terrace, when I thought him still by the sea: "This is to give you notice that I am coming to breakfast with you this morning on my way to Broadstairs. I repeat it, sir,—on my way to Broadstairs. For, directly I got Macready's note yesterday I went to Canterbury, and came on by day-coach for the express purpose of talking with him; which I did between 11 and 12 last night in Clarence Terrace. The American preliminaries are necessarily startling, and, to a gentleman of my temperament, destroy rest, sleep, appetite, and work, unless definitely arranged.[42] Macready has quite decided me in respect of time and so forth. The instant I have wrung a reluctant[288] consent from Kate, I shall take our joint passage in the mail-packet for next January. I never loved my friends so well as now." We had all discountenanced his first thought of taking the children; and, upon this and other points, the experience of our friend who had himself traveled over the States was very valuable. His next letter, two days later from Broadstairs, informed me of the result of the Macready conference: "Only a word. Kate is quite reconciled. 'Anne' (her maid) goes, and is amazingly cheerful and light of heart upon it. And I think, at present, that it's a greater trial to me than anybody. The 4th of January is the day. Macready's note to Kate was received and acted upon with a perfect response. She talks about it quite gayly, and is satisfied to have nobody in the house but Fred, of whom, as you know, they are all fond. He has got his promotion, and they give him the increased salary from the day on which the minute was made by Baring, I feel so amiable, so meek, so fond of people, so full of gratitudes and reliances, that I am like a sick man. And I am already counting the days between this and coming home again."
His next letter was an unexpected delivery from Devonshire Terrace, just when I thought he was still by the sea: "I’m writing to let you know that I’m coming to breakfast with you this morning on my way to Broadstairs. I’ll say it again, sir—on my way to Broadstairs. As soon as I received Macready's note yesterday, I went to Canterbury and took the day coach specifically to talk with him; which I did between 11 and 12 last night in Clarence Terrace. The American preliminaries are understandably surprising, and for someone with my temperament, they disrupt my rest, sleep, appetite, and work unless they’re laid out clearly. [42] Macready has firmly decided things regarding timing and such. The moment I get a hesitant agreement from Kate, I’ll book our tickets together for the mail packet in January. I’ve never appreciated my friends more than I do now." We had all been against his idea of taking the kids, and on this and other matters, the experience of our friend who had traveled across the States was really helpful. His next letter, two days later from Broadstairs, updated me on the outcome of the Macready meeting: "Just a quick note. Kate is completely on board. 'Anne' (her maid) is coming and is surprisingly cheerful about it. Honestly, I think it’s more of a struggle for me than for anyone else. January 4th is the date. Macready's note to Kate was received well and responded to perfectly. She talks about it quite happily and is fine with having only Fred in the house, whom, as you know, they all adore. He’s been promoted, and they’re giving him the raised salary from the day Baring approved it. I’m feeling so friendly, so gentle, so fond of people, and so full of gratitude and hopes that it’s like I’m unwell. I’m already counting the days until I get to come home again."
He was soon, alas! to be what he compared himself to. I met him at Rochester at the end of September, as arranged; we passed a day and night there; a day and night in Cobham and its neighborhood, sleeping at the Leather Bottle; and a day and night at Gravesend. But we were hardly returned when some slight symptoms of bodily trouble took suddenly graver form, and an illness followed involving the necessity of surgical attendance. This, which with mention of the helpful courage displayed by him has before been[289] alluded to,[43] put off necessarily the Glasgow dinner; and he had scarcely left his bedroom when a trouble arose near home which touched him to the depths of the greatest sorrow of his life, and, in the need of exerting himself for others, what remained of his own illness seemed to pass away.
He was soon, unfortunately, to become what he compared himself to. I met him in Rochester at the end of September, as planned; we spent a day and night there; a day and night in Cobham and its surroundings, staying at the Leather Bottle; and a day and night at Gravesend. But we had barely returned when some minor signs of health issues suddenly escalated, leading to an illness that required surgery. This situation, along with the mention of his brave demeanor, has been noted before[289][43] and was the reason for postponing the Glasgow dinner; and he had hardly left his bedroom when a problem arose nearby that deeply affected him, bringing the greatest sorrow of his life. Yet, in his need to support others, any remnants of his own illness seemed to fade away.
His wife's younger brother had died with the same unexpected suddenness that attended her younger sister's death; and the event had followed close upon the decease of Mrs. Hogarth's mother while on a visit to her daughter and Mr. Hogarth. "As no steps had been taken towards the funeral," he wrote (25th October) in reply to my offer of such service as I could render, "I thought it best at once to bestir myself; and not even you could have saved my going to the cemetery. It is a great trial to me to give up Mary's grave; greater than I can possibly express. I thought of moving her to the catacombs and saying nothing about it; but then I remembered that the poor old lady is buried next her at her own desire, and could not find it in my heart, directly she is laid in the earth, to take her grandchild away. The desire to be buried next her is as strong upon me now as it was five years ago; and I know (for I don't think there ever was love like that I bear her) that it will never diminish. I fear I can do nothing. Do you think I can? They would move her on Wednesday, if I resolved to have it done. I cannot bear the thought of being excluded from her dust; and yet I feel that her brothers and sisters, and her mother, have a better right than I to[290] be placed beside her. It is but an idea. I neither think nor hope (God forbid) that our spirits would ever mingle there. I ought to get the better of it, but it is very hard. I never contemplated this—and coming so suddenly, and after being ill, it disturbs me more than it ought. It seems like losing her a second time. . . ." "No," he wrote the morning after, "I tried that. No, there is no ground on either side to be had. I must give it up. I shall drive over there, please God, on Thursday morning, before they get there; and look at her coffin."
His wife's younger brother died just as unexpectedly as her younger sister had; this happened shortly after Mrs. Hogarth's mother passed away while visiting her daughter and Mr. Hogarth. "Since no arrangements had been made for the funeral," he wrote (October 25th) in response to my offer of assistance, "I felt it was best to take action right away; not even you could have stopped me from going to the cemetery. It’s a huge struggle for me to let go of Mary’s grave, greater than I can possibly say. I considered moving her to the catacombs and keeping it quiet, but then I remembered that the poor old lady is buried next to her by her own wish, and I couldn't bring myself to take her grandchild away right after she’s laid to rest. The wish to be buried next to her is just as strong for me now as it was five years ago; and I know (because I don’t think there’s ever been a love like what I feel for her) that it will never fade. I fear I can’t do anything. Do you think I can? They would move her on Wednesday if I decided to have it done. I can’t stand the thought of being kept away from her remains; yet I feel that her brothers, sisters, and mother have a better claim than I do to be placed beside her. It's just a thought. I don't think or hope (God forbid) that our spirits would ever be together there. I should be able to handle this, but it’s really hard. I never expected this—and coming so suddenly, and after being sick, it bothers me more than it should. It feels like losing her all over again. . . ." "No," he wrote the next morning, "I tried that. No, there’s no ground to be gained on either side. I have to let it go. I’ll drive over there, God willing, on Thursday morning, before they arrive; and I’ll look at her coffin."
He suffered more than he let any one perceive, and was obliged again to keep his room for some days. On the 2d of November he reported himself as progressing and ordered to Richmond, which, after a week or so, he changed to the White Hart at Windsor, where I passed some days with him, Mrs. Dickens, and her younger sister Georgina; but it was not till near the close of that month he could describe himself as thoroughly on his legs again, in the ordinary state on which he was wont to pride himself, bolt upright, staunch at the knees, a deep sleeper, a hearty eater, a good laugher, and nowhere a bit the worse, "bating a little weakness now and then, and a slight nervousness at times."
He suffered more than anyone realized and had to stay in his room for a few days. On November 2nd, he reported that he was getting better and was sent to Richmond, which he later changed to the White Hart in Windsor after about a week. I spent a few days there with him, Mrs. Dickens, and her younger sister Georgina. It wasn't until near the end of that month that he could say he was fully back on his feet, in the usual shape he used to take pride in: standing tall, solid at the knees, a deep sleeper, a hearty eater, a good laugher, and not really any worse for wear, "except for a bit of weakness now and then, and some slight nervousness occasionally."
We had some days of much enjoyment at the end of the year, when Landor came up from Bath for the christening of his godson; and the "Britannia," which was to take the travelers from us in January, brought over to them in December all sorts of cordialities, anticipations, and stretchings-forth of palms, in token of the welcome awaiting them. On New Year's Eve they[291] dined with me, and I with them on New Year's Day; when (his house having been taken for the period of his absence by General Sir John Wilson) we sealed up his wine-cellar, after opening therein some sparkling Moselle in honor of the ceremony, and drinking it then and there to his happy return. Next morning (it was a Sunday) I accompanied them to Liverpool, Maclise having been suddenly stayed by his mother's death; the intervening day and its occupations have been humorously sketched in his American book; and on the 4th they sailed. I never saw the Britannia after I stepped from her deck back to the small steamer that had taken us to her. "How little I thought" (were the last lines of his first American letter), "the first time you mounted the shapeless coat, that I should have such a sad association with its back as when I saw it by the paddle-box of that small steamer!"
We had some really enjoyable days at the end of the year when Landor came up from Bath for his godson's christening. The "Britannia," which was set to take the travelers from us in January, brought over all kinds of warm greetings, hopes, and outstretched hands in December to show the welcome awaiting them. On New Year's Eve, they had dinner with me, and I joined them for dinner on New Year's Day. Since General Sir John Wilson rented his house while he was away, we sealed up his wine cellar after opening some sparkling Moselle to honor the occasion and toasted to his safe return right then and there. The next morning (it was a Sunday), I went with them to Liverpool. Maclise couldn’t join us because of his mother's sudden death. The day before and what we did then are humorously described in his American book. They sailed on the 4th. I never saw the Britannia again after I stepped off her deck back onto the small steamer that had taken us to her. "How little I thought" (were the last lines of his first American letter), "the first time you climbed onto that shapeless coat, that I would have such a sad memory of its back when I saw it by the paddle-box of that small steamer!"
CHAPTER XIX.
FIRST IMPRESSIONS OF AMERICA.
1842.
The first lines of that letter were written as soon as he got sight of earth again, from the banks of Newfoundland, on Monday, the 17th of January, the fourteenth day from their departure: even then so far from Halifax that they could not expect to make it before Wednesday night, or to reach Boston until Saturday or Sunday. They had not been fortunate in the passage. During the whole voyage the weather had been unprecedentedly[293] bad, the wind for the most part dead against them, the wet intolerable, the sea horribly disturbed, the days dark, and the nights fearful. On the previous Monday night it had blown a hurricane, beginning at five in the afternoon and raging all night. His description of the storm is published, and the peculiarities of a steamer's behavior in such circumstances are hit off as if he had been all his life a sailor. Any but so extraordinary an observer would have described a steamer in a storm as he would have described a sailing-ship in a storm. But any description of the latter would be as inapplicable to my friend's account of the other as the ways of a jackass to those of a mad bull. In the letter from which it was taken, however, there were some things addressed to myself alone: "For two or three hours we gave it up as a lost thing; and with many thoughts of you, and the children, and those others who are dearest to us, waited quietly for the worst. I never expected to see the day again, and resigned myself to God as well as I could. It was a great comfort to think of the earnest and devoted friends we had left behind, and to know that the darlings would not want."
The first lines of that letter were written as soon as he saw land again, from the shores of Newfoundland, on Monday, January 17, fourteen days after their departure. They were still so far from Halifax that they couldn't expect to arrive before Wednesday night, and Boston would be unreachable until Saturday or Sunday. Their journey had not been fortunate. Throughout the entire voyage, the weather had been unusually[293] terrible, with the wind mostly against them, the rain unbearable, the sea violently rough, the days gloomy, and the nights terrifying. The previous Monday night had seen a hurricane, starting at five in the afternoon and raging all night. His account of the storm has been published, and he described how a steamer behaves in such conditions as if he had been a sailor his whole life. Any less observant person would have described a steamer in a storm just as they would a sailing ship in a storm. But any description of a sailing ship would be as irrelevant to my friend's account of the steamer as the behavior of a donkey is to that of a raging bull. However, the letter contained some things meant only for me: "For two or three hours, we thought we were lost; and with many thoughts of you, the kids, and those who are most dear to us, we quietly faced the worst. I never expected to see another day, and I resigned myself to God as best as I could. It was a great comfort to think of the earnest and devoted friends we had left behind, and to know that the little ones would be okay."
This was not the exaggerated apprehension of a landsman merely. The head engineer, who had been in one or other of the Cunard vessels since they began running, had never seen such stress of weather; and I heard Captain Hewitt himself say afterwards that nothing but a steamer, and one of that strength, could have kept her course and stood it out. A sailing-vessel must have beaten off and driven where she could; while through all the fury of that gale they actually[294] made fifty-four miles headlong through the tempest, straight on end, not varying their track in the least.
This wasn't just an exaggerated fear from someone unfamiliar with the sea. The head engineer, who had worked on one of the Cunard ships since they first started operating, had never witnessed such extreme weather. I later heard Captain Hewitt himself say that only a steamship, especially one as strong as theirs, could have maintained its course and endured it. A sailing ship would have been forced to turn and find shelter; yet through the chaos of that storm they actually[294] traveled fifty-four miles straight through the tempest, unwavering in their path.
He stood out against sickness only for the day following that on which they sailed. For the three following days he kept his bed, miserable enough, and had not, until the eighth day of the voyage, six days before the date of his letter, been able to get to work at the dinner-table. What he then observed of his fellow-travelers, and had to tell of their life on board, has been set forth in his Notes with delightful humor; but in its first freshness I received it in this letter, and some whimsical passages, then suppressed, there will be no harm in printing now:
He only managed to hold up against illness for one day after they set sail. For the next three days, he was stuck in bed, feeling pretty miserable, and he didn't get back to work at the dinner table until the eighth day of the trip, which was six days before the date of his letter. What he noticed about his fellow travelers and what he had to say about their life on board is shared in his Notes with great humor; but I received it in its original form through this letter, and some funny bits that were later left out can be shared now:
"We have 86 passengers; and such a strange collection of beasts never was got together upon the sea, since the days of the Ark. I have never been in the saloon since the first day; the noise, the smell, and the closeness being quite intolerable. I have only been on deck once!—and then I was surprised and disappointed at the smallness of the panorama. The sea, running as it does and has done, is very stupendous, and viewed from the air or some great height would be grand no doubt. But seen from the wet and rolling decks, in this weather and these circumstances, it only impresses one giddily and painfully. I was very glad to turn away, and come below again.
"We have 86 passengers, and such a weird mix of creatures has never been gathered on the sea since the days of the Ark. I haven't been in the saloon since the first day; the noise, the smell, and the closeness are just unbearable. I’ve only been on deck once!—and I was both surprised and disappointed by how small the view was. The sea, as it moves and has always moved, is pretty impressive, and I'm sure it would look grand from the air or a great height. But from the wet and rolling decks, in this weather and these conditions, it just makes you feel dizzy and uncomfortable. I was really glad to turn away and go back below.
"I have established myself, from the first, in the ladies' cabin—you remember it? I'll describe its other occupants, and our way of passing the time, to you.
"I've made myself comfortable in the ladies' cabin from the start—you remember it? I'll tell you about the other people there and how we spend our time."
"First, for the occupants. Kate and I, and Anne—when she is out of bed, which is not often. A queer[295] little Scotch body, a Mrs. P—,[44] whose husband is a silversmith in New York. He married her at Glasgow three years ago, and bolted the day after the wedding; being (which he had not told her) heavily in debt. Since then she has been living with her mother; and she is now going out under the protection of a male cousin, to give him a year's trial. If she is not comfortable at the expiration of that time, she means to go back to Scotland again. A Mrs. B—, about 20 years old, whose husband is on board with her. He is a young Englishman domiciled in New York, and by trade (as well as I can make out) a woolen-draper. They have been married a fortnight. A Mr. and Mrs. C—, marvelously fond of each other, complete the catalogue. Mrs. C—, I have settled, is a publican's daughter, and Mr. C— is running away with her, the till, the time-piece off the bar mantel-shelf, the mother's gold watch from the pocket at the head of the bed; and other miscellaneous property. The women are all pretty; unusually pretty. I never saw such good faces together, anywhere."
"First, about the residents. Kate and I, along with Anne—when she gets out of bed, which isn’t very often. A quirky little Scottish woman, Mrs. P—, whose husband is a silversmith in New York. He married her in Glasgow three years ago and bolted the day after the wedding; he had never mentioned to her that he was heavily in debt. Since then, she has been living with her mother, and now she’s going out with a male cousin for a year to see how it goes. If she's not happy after that, she plans to return to Scotland. Then there's Mrs. B—, about 20 years old, whose husband is with her. He’s a young Englishman living in New York and, as far as I can tell, he works as a woolen draper. They’ve only been married for two weeks. Finally, there’s Mr. and Mrs. C—, who are incredibly in love with each other. I’ve figured out that Mrs. C— is the daughter of a pub owner, and Mr. C— is eloping with her, taking the cash register, the clock from the bar shelf, the mother’s gold watch from the pocket at the head of the bed, and other random items. All the women are beautiful; unusually beautiful. I’ve never seen such lovely faces together anywhere."
Their "way of passing the time" will be found in the Notes much as it was written to me; except that there was one point connected with the card-playing which he feared might overtax the credulity of his readers, but which he protested had occurred more than once: "Apropos of rolling, I have forgotten to mention that in playing whist we are obliged to put[296] the tricks in our pockets, to keep them from disappearing altogether; and that five or six times in the course of every rubber we are all flung from our seats, roll out at different doors, and keep on rolling until we are picked up by stewards. This has become such a matter of course, that we go through it with perfect gravity, and, when we are bolstered up on our sofas again, resume our conversation or our game at the point where it was interrupted." The news that excited them from day to day, too, of which little more than a hint appears in the Notes, is worth giving as originally written:
Their "way of passing the time" can be found in the Notes, just as it was shared with me; except there was one detail about the card-playing that he thought might be hard for his readers to believe, but he insisted it had happened more than once: "Speaking of rolling, I forgot to mention that when we play whist, we have to put[296] the tricks in our pockets to stop them from completely disappearing; and that five or six times during each rubber, we all get thrown from our seats, roll out through different doors, and keep rolling until stewards pick us up. This has become so routine that we handle it with complete seriousness, and when we're propped back on our sofas, we continue our conversation or our game right from where it was interrupted." The news that excited them from day to day, which is only hinted at in the Notes, is worth sharing as it was originally written:
"As for news, we have more of that than you would think for. One man lost fourteen pounds at vingt-un in the saloon yesterday, or another got drunk before dinner was over, or another was blinded with lobster-sauce spilt over him by the steward, or another had a fall on deck and fainted. The ship's cook was drunk yesterday morning (having got at some salt-water-damaged whiskey), and the captain ordered the boatswain to play upon him with the hose of the fire-engine until he roared for mercy—which he didn't get: for he was sentenced to look out, for four hours at a stretch for four nights running, without a great-coat, and to have his grog stopped. Four dozen plates were broken at dinner. One steward fell down the cabin stairs with a round of beef, and injured his foot severely. Another steward fell down after him and cut his eye open. The baker's taken ill; so is the pastry-cook. A new man, sick to death, has been required to fill the place of the latter officer, and has been dragged out of bed and propped up in a little house upon deck, between two[297] casks, and ordered (the captain standing over him) to make and roll out pie-crust; which he protests, with tears in his eyes, it is death to him in his bilious state to look at. Twelve dozen of bottled porter has got loose upon deck, and the bottles are rolling about distractedly, overhead. Lord Mulgrave (a handsome fellow, by-the-by, to look at, and nothing but a good 'un to go) laid a wager with twenty-five other men last night, whose berths, like his, are in the fore-cabin, which can only be got at by crossing the deck, that he would reach his cabin first. Watches were set by the captain's, and they sallied forth, wrapped up in coats and storm caps. The sea broke over the ship so violently, that they were five-and-twenty minutes holding on by the handrail at the starboard paddle-box, drenched to the skin by every wave, and not daring to go on or come back, lest they should be washed overboard. News! A dozen murders in town wouldn't interest us half as much."
"As for the news, we have more than you’d expect. One guy lost fourteen pounds playing blackjack in the bar yesterday, another got drunk before dinner was even over, someone else got blinded when the steward spilled lobster sauce on him, and another person fainted after taking a tumble on deck. The ship's cook was drunk yesterday morning (he found some whiskey that got ruined by saltwater), and the captain ordered the boatswain to spray him with the fire hose until he begged for mercy—which he didn’t get: he was sentenced to stand watch for four hours straight for four nights in a row without a coat and had his grog taken away. Four dozen plates were broken at dinner. One steward tripped down the cabin stairs while carrying a roast and badly hurt his foot. Another steward followed him down and cut his eye. The baker has fallen ill; so has the pastry chef. A new guy, who’s feeling terrible, has been forced to take the pastry chef’s place, and he’s been dragged out of bed and propped up in a small shack on deck, between two barrels, and told (with the captain overseeing) to make and roll out pie crust; he insists, with tears in his eyes, that just looking at it in his nauseous state feels like it’s killing him. Twelve dozen bottles of porter have gotten loose on deck and are rolling around chaotically above us. Lord Mulgrave (who’s quite the looker, by the way, but just a decent guy) made a bet with twenty-five other men last night, whose cabins, like his, are in the fore-cabin, which can only be accessed by crossing the deck, that he would reach his cabin first. The captain set the watches, and they set out, bundled up in coats and storm caps. The sea crashed over the ship so hard that they spent twenty-five minutes hanging onto the handrail at the starboard paddle box, soaked to the skin with every wave, afraid to go forward or back in case they got swept overboard. News? A dozen murders in town wouldn't faze us half as much."
Nevertheless their excitements were not over. At the very end of the voyage came an incident very lightly touched in the Notes, but more freely told to me under date of the 21st January: "We were running into Halifax harbor on Wednesday night, with little wind and a bright moon; had made the light at its outer entrance, and given the ship in charge to the pilot; were playing our rubber, all in good spirits (for it had been comparatively smooth for some days, with tolerably dry decks and other unusual comforts), when suddenly the ship struck! A rush upon deck followed, of course. The men (I mean the crew! think of this) were kicking off their shoes and throwing[298] off their jackets preparatory to swimming ashore; the pilot was beside himself; the passengers dismayed; and everything in the most intolerable confusion and hurry. Breakers were roaring ahead; the land within a couple of hundred yards; and the vessel driving upon the surf, although her paddles were worked backwards, and everything done to stay her course. It is not the custom of steamers, it seems, to have an anchor ready. An accident occurred in getting ours over the side; and for half an hour we were throwing up rockets, burning blue-lights, and firing signals of distress, all of which remained unanswered, though we were so close to the shore that we could see the waving branches of the trees. All this time, as we veered about, a man was heaving the lead every two minutes; the depths of water constantly decreasing; and nobody self-possessed but Hewitt. They let go the anchor at last, got out a boat, and sent her ashore with the fourth officer, the pilot, and four men aboard, to try and find out where we were. The pilot had no idea; but Hewitt put his little finger upon a certain part of the chart, and was as confident of the exact spot (though he had never been there in his life) as if he had lived there from infancy. The boat's return about an hour afterwards proved him to be quite right. We had got into a place called the Eastern Passage, in a sudden fog and through the pilot's folly. We had struck upon a mud-bank, and driven into a perfect little pond, surrounded by banks and rocks and shoals of all kinds: the only safe speck in the place. Eased by this report, and the assurance that the tide was past the ebb, we turned in at three o'clock in the morning, to lie there all night."[299]
Nonetheless, their excitement was far from over. At the very end of the journey, an event briefly mentioned in the Notes, but explained to me in detail on January 21st, happened: "We were entering Halifax harbor on Wednesday night, with little wind and a bright full moon; we had reached the light at the outer entrance and turned over the ship to the pilot; while we were playing our card game, all in good spirits (it had been fairly smooth for several days, with reasonably dry decks and other unusual comforts), when suddenly the ship hit! Naturally, everyone rushed to the deck. The crew—think about that—were kicking off their shoes and tossing off their jackets in preparation to swim to shore; the pilot was panicking; the passengers were dismayed; and everything was in complete chaos and haste. Waves were crashing ahead; land was just a couple of hundred yards away; the vessel was heading straight for the surf, even though her paddles were reversed, and everything possible was done to stop her. It seems that it's not standard for steamers to have an anchor ready. An accident occurred while trying to get ours over the side. For half an hour, we were shooting off rockets, burning colored lights, and sending distress signals, all of which went unanswered, even though we were so close to shore that we could see the trees swaying. During this time, while we drifted, someone was checking the depth every two minutes; the water levels kept dropping; and no one remained composed except for Hewitt. They finally dropped the anchor, launched a boat, and sent it ashore with the fourth officer, the pilot, and four crew members to try to find out where we were. The pilot had no clue, but Hewitt confidently pointed to a spot on the chart, as certain of its location (even though he had never been there) as if he had lived there his whole life. The boat returned about an hour later, proving he was completely correct. We had accidentally ended up in a place called the Eastern Passage, lost in sudden fog due to the pilot's mistake. We had run aground on a mud bank and ended up in a little pond, surrounded by banks, rocks, and all kinds of shallow areas— the only safe spot in the area. Relieved by this news, and knowing the tide had turned, we went to bed at three o'clock in the morning and stayed put for the night."[299]
The next day's landing at Halifax, and delivery of the mails, are sketched in the Notes; but not his personal part in what followed: "Then, sir, comes a breathless man who has been already into the ship and out again, shouting my name as he tears along. I stop, arm in arm with the little doctor whom I have taken ashore for oysters. The breathless man introduces himself as The Speaker of the House of Assembly; will drag me away to his house; and will have a carriage and his wife sent down for Kate, who is laid up with a hideously swoln face. Then he drags me up to the Governor's house (Lord Falkland is the governor), and then Heaven knows where; concluding with both houses of parliament, which happen to meet for the session that very day, and are opened by a mock speech from the throne delivered by the governor, with one of Lord Grey's sons for his aide-de-camp, and a great host of officers about him. I wish you could have seen the crowds cheering the inimitable[45] in the streets. I wish you could have seen judges, law-officers, bishops, and law-makers welcoming the inimitable. I wish you could have seen the inimitable shown to a great elbow-chair by the Speaker's throne, and sitting alone in the middle of the floor of the House of Commons, the observed of all observers, listening with exemplary gravity to the queerest speaking possible, and breaking in spite of himself into a smile as he thought of this commencement to the Thousand and One stories in reserve for home and Lincoln's Inn Fields and Jack Straw's Castle.—Ah, Forster! when I do come back again!——"
The next day's arrival in Halifax and the delivery of the mail are described in the Notes; but not his personal role in what happened next: "Then, a breathless man who has already been in and out of the ship runs toward me, shouting my name as he rushes by. I stop, arm in arm with the little doctor I've taken ashore for oysters. The breathless man introduces himself as The Speaker of the House of Assembly; he will pull me away to his house; and he will have a carriage and his wife sent for Kate, who is stuck at home with a terribly swollen face. Then he takes me up to the Governor's house (Lord Falkland is the governor), and then who knows where; ending with both houses of parliament, which just happen to meet for the session that very day, opened by a mock speech from the throne delivered by the governor, with one of Lord Grey's sons serving as his aide-de-camp, and a large crowd of officers around him. I wish you could have seen the crowds cheering the inimitable[45] in the streets. I wish you could have seen judges, law officers, bishops, and lawmakers welcoming the inimitable. I wish you could have seen the inimitable shown to a grand armchair by the Speaker's throne, sitting alone in the middle of the House of Commons floor, the center of attention, listening with serious composure to the strangest speeches imaginable, and breaking into a smile despite himself as he thought about this beginning to the Thousand and One stories waiting for home and Lincoln's Inn Fields and Jack Straw's Castle.—Ah, Forster! when I do come back again!——"
He resumed his letter at Tremont House on Saturday, the 28th of January, having reached Boston that day week at five in the afternoon; and, as his first American experience is very lightly glanced at in the Notes, a fuller picture will perhaps be welcome. "As the Cunard boats have a wharf of their own at the custom-house, and that a narrow one, we were a long time (an hour at least) working in. I was standing in full fig on the paddle-box beside the captain, staring about me, when suddenly, long before we were moored to the wharf, a dozen men came leaping on board at the peril of their lives, with great bundles of newspapers under their arms; worsted comforters (very much the worse for wear) round their necks; and so forth. 'Aha!' says I, 'this is like our London Bridge;' believing of course that these visitors were news-boys. But what do you think of their being Editors? And what do you think of their tearing violently up to me and beginning to shake hands like madmen? Oh! if you could have seen how I wrung their wrists! And if you could but know how I hated one man in very dirty gaiters, and with very protruding upper teeth, who said to all comers after him, 'So you've been introduced to our friend Dickens—eh?' There was one among them, though, who really was of use; a Doctor S., editor of the ——. He ran off here (two miles at least), and ordered rooms and dinner. And in course of time Kate, and I, and Lord Mulgrave (who was going back to his regiment at Montreal on Monday, and had agreed to live with us in the mean while) sat down in a spacious and handsome room to a very handsome dinner, bating peculiarities of putting on table, and had[301] forgotten the ship entirely. A Mr. Alexander, to whom I had written from England promising to sit for a portrait, was on board directly we touched the land, and brought us here in his carriage. Then, after sending a present of most beautiful flowers, he left us to ourselves, and we thanked him for it."
He continued his letter from Tremont House on Saturday, January 28th, after arriving in Boston the previous week at five in the afternoon. Since his first American experience is only briefly mentioned in the Notes, a more detailed account might be appreciated. "The Cunard boats have their own wharf at the customs house, which is quite narrow, so it took us a long time (at least an hour) to get into port. I was standing proudly on the paddle-box next to the captain, looking around, when suddenly, well before we were docked, about twelve men jumped onboard at great risk to themselves, carrying large bundles of newspapers. They had worn-out scarves around their necks and so on. 'Ah,' I thought, 'this is just like our London Bridge,' believing, of course, that these newcomers were newsboys. But guess what? They were Editors! And can you imagine them rushing over to me and shaking hands like crazy? Oh! If only you could have seen how I shook their hands! And just so you know, I detested one guy in very dirty boots with prominent upper teeth, who greeted everyone after him with, 'So you've been introduced to our friend Dickens—right?' However, there was one among them who was genuinely helpful; Dr. S., editor of the ——. He dashed off (at least two miles) to book rooms and dinner. Eventually, Kate, I, and Lord Mulgrave (who was heading back to his regiment in Montreal on Monday and had agreed to stay with us in the meantime) sat down in a spacious and elegant room to a lovely dinner, despite some odd ways they set the table, and I completely forgot about the ship. A Mr. Alexander, to whom I had written from England promising to sit for a portrait, was on board as soon as we landed and brought us here in his carriage. After sending us a gift of beautiful flowers, he left us alone, and we thanked him for it."
What further he had to say of that week's experience finds its first public utterance here. "How can I tell you," he continues, "what has happened since that first day? How can I give you the faintest notion of my reception here; of the crowds that pour in and out the whole day; of the people that line the streets when I go out; of the cheering when I went to the theatre; of the copies of verses, letters of congratulation, welcomes of all kinds, balls, dinners, assemblies without end? There is to be a public dinner to me here in Boston, next Tuesday, and great dissatisfaction has been given to the many by the high price (three pounds sterling each) of the tickets. There is to be a ball next Monday week at New York, and 150 names appear on the list of the committee. There is to be a dinner in the same place, in the same week, to which I have had an invitation with every known name in America appended to it. But what can I tell you about any of these things which will give you the slightest notion of the enthusiastic greeting they give me, or the cry that runs through the whole country? I have had deputations from the Far West, who have come from more than two thousand miles' distance: from the lakes, the rivers, the back-woods, the log houses, the cities, factories, villages, and towns. Authorities from nearly all the States have written to me. I have heard from the[302] universities, Congress, Senate, and bodies, public and private, of every sort and kind. 'It is no-nonsense, and no common feeling,' wrote Dr. Channing to me yesterday. 'It is all heart. There never was, and never will be, such a triumph.' And it is a good thing, is it not, . . . to find those fancies it has given me and you the greatest satisfaction to think of, at the core of it all? It makes my heart quieter, and me a more retiring, sober, tranquil man, to watch the effect of those thoughts in all this noise and hurry, even than if I sat, pen in hand, to put them down for the first time. I feel, in the best aspects of this welcome, something of the presence and influence of that spirit which directs my life, and through a heavy sorrow has pointed upwards with unchanging finger for more than four years past. And if I know my heart, not twenty times this praise would move me to an act of folly." . . .
What he has to say about that week’s experience is shared publicly here for the first time. "How can I tell you," he continues, "what has happened since that first day? How can I give you the slightest idea of my reception here; of the crowds that come and go all day; of the people who line the streets when I step out; of the cheering when I went to the theater; of the poems, congratulatory letters, welcomes of all kinds, parties, dinners, and endless gatherings? There’s a public dinner for me here in Boston next Tuesday, and many are upset about the high ticket price (three pounds each). There’s a ball next Monday week in New York, with 150 names on the committee list. There’s also a dinner in the same place that week, to which I’ve received an invitation that includes every notable name in America. But what can I share about any of this that would give you even a hint of the enthusiastic welcome I’ve received, or the excitement that’s spreading throughout the country? I’ve had groups come from the Far West, traveling over two thousand miles: from the lakes, rivers, backwoods, log cabins, cities, factories, villages, and towns. Officials from almost all the states have reached out to me. I've received messages from the universities, Congress, Senate, and various public and private organizations. 'It’s no ordinary thing, and not common sentiment,’ Dr. Channing wrote to me yesterday. 'It’s all from the heart. There has never been, and never will be, such a triumph.' And it’s nice, isn’t it, to find those dreams that have brought you and me so much joy at the core of all of this? It calms my heart and makes me a more humble, serious, and peaceful person as I observe the impact of those thoughts amid all this chaos, even more than if I were sitting here with pen in hand, writing them down for the first time. I sense, in the best moments of this welcome, the presence and influence of that spirit that guides my life, which, despite overwhelming sorrow, has pointed upward without wavering for more than four years. And if I know my heart, not even twenty times this praise would lead me to act foolishly."
There were but two days more before the post left for England, and the close of this part of his letter sketched the engagements that awaited him on leaving Boston: "We leave here next Saturday. We go to a place called Worcester, about 75 miles off, to the house of the governor of this place; and stay with him all Sunday. On Monday we go on by railroad about 50 miles further to a town called Springfield, where I am met by a 'reception committee' from Hartford 20 miles further, and carried on by the multitude: I am sure I don't know how, but I shouldn't wonder if they appear with a triumphal car. On Wednesday I have a public dinner there. On Friday I shall be obliged to present myself in public again, at a place called New[303] Haven, about 30 miles further. On Saturday evening I hope to be at New York; and there I shall stay ten days or a fortnight. You will suppose that I have enough to do. I am sitting for a portrait and for a bust. I have the correspondence of a secretary of state, and the engagements of a fashionable physician. I have a secretary whom I take on with me. He is a young man of the name of Q.; was strongly recommended to me; is most modest, obliging, silent, and willing; and does his work well. He boards and lodges at my expense when we travel; and his salary is ten dollars per month—about two pounds five of our English money. There will be dinners and balls at Washington, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and I believe everywhere. In Canada, I have promised to play at the theatre with the officers, for the benefit of a charity. We are already weary, at times, past all expression; and I finish this by means of a pious fraud. We were engaged to a party, and have written to say we are both desperately ill. . . . 'Well,' I can fancy you saying, 'but about his impressions of Boston and the Americans?'—Of the latter, I will not say a word until I have seen more of them, and have gone into the interior. I will only say, now, that we have never yet been required to dine at a table-d'hôte; that, thus far, our rooms are as much our own here as they would be at the Clarendon; that but for an odd phrase now and then—such as Snap of cold weather; a tongue-y man for a talkative fellow; Possible? as a solitary interrogation; and Yes? for indeed—I should have marked, so far, no difference whatever between the parties here and those I have left behind. The women are very[304] beautiful, but they soon fade; the general breeding is neither stiff nor forward; the good nature, universal. If you ask the way to a place—of some common water-side man, who don't know you from Adam—he turns and goes with you. Universal deference is paid to ladies; and they, walk about at all seasons, wholly unprotected. . . . This hotel is a trifle smaller than Finsbury Square; and is made so infernally hot (I use the expression advisedly) by means of a furnace with pipes running through the passages, that we can hardly bear it. There are no curtains to the beds, or to the bedroom windows. I am told there never are, hardly, all through America. The bedrooms are indeed very bare of furniture. Ours is nearly as large as your great room, and has a wardrobe in it of painted wood not larger (I appeal to K.) than an English watch-box. I slept in this room for two nights, quite satisfied with the belief that it was a shower-bath."
There were just two days left before the mail left for England, and the end of this part of his letter outlined the plans he had after leaving Boston: "We leave here next Saturday. We’re heading to a place called Worcester, about 75 miles away, to stay at the governor's house, and we’ll be there all Sunday. On Monday, we’ll take the train about 50 miles further to a town called Springfield, where a 'reception committee' from Hartford, 20 miles beyond, will meet me and likely carry me along with a lot of fanfare—I wouldn’t be surprised if they show up with a parade. On Wednesday, I have a public dinner there. On Friday, I have to make a public appearance again in a place called New Haven, about 30 miles further. By Saturday evening, I hope to be in New York, where I plan to stay for ten days or maybe two weeks. You can imagine I have plenty to do. I’m sitting for a portrait and a bust. I have the responsibilities of a secretary of state and the appointments of a popular doctor. I have a secretary traveling with me. His name is Q.; he was highly recommended to me; he is very modest, helpful, quiet, and eager, and he does his job well. He eats and sleeps at my expense while we travel, and his salary is ten dollars a month—about two pounds five in our British money. There will be dinners and dances in Washington, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and, I believe, everywhere. In Canada, I promised to perform at the theater with the officers for a charity event. We’re already feeling quite exhausted at times beyond expression, and I’m wrapping this up with a little white lie. We had a party invitation, and we’ve written to say we are both extremely ill. . . . 'Well,' I can imagine you saying, 'but what about his thoughts on Boston and the Americans?'—Regarding the latter, I won’t say anything until I’ve seen more of them and traveled into the interior. For now, I’ll only mention that we’ve never had to eat at a communal table; so far, our rooms are just as much ours here as they would be at the Clarendon; and aside from the occasional odd phrasing—like Snap of cold weather; a tongue-y man for a talkative person; Possible? as a single-question inquiry; and Yes? for indeed—I wouldn’t have noted any difference between the people here and those I left behind. The women are very[304] beautiful, but they don’t last long; the general manners are neither stiff nor overly forward; the friendliness is everywhere. If you ask someone for directions—some random person by the water, who doesn’t know you at all—they’ll turn and walk with you. Everyone shows respect to ladies, and they walk around at all times without escorts. . . . This hotel is a bit smaller than Finsbury Square and is made so unbearably hot (I mean that seriously) by a furnace with pipes running through the hallways that we can hardly stand it. There aren’t any curtains on the beds or the bedroom windows. I’m told this is pretty much the case all over America. The bedrooms really lack furniture. Ours is nearly as big as your large room and has a wardrobe made of painted wood that isn’t larger (I’ll ask K.) than an English watch box. I slept in this room for two nights, fully convinced it was like a shower-bath."
The last addition made to this letter, from which many vividest pages of the Notes (among them the bright quaint picture of Boston streets) were taken with small alteration, bore date the 29th of January: "I hardly know what to add to all this long and unconnected history. Dana, the author of that Two Years before the Mast" (a book which I had praised much to him, thinking it like De Foe), "is a very nice fellow indeed; and in appearance not at all the man you would expect. He is short, mild-looking, and has a care-worn face. His father is exactly like George Cruikshank after a night's jollity—only shorter. The professors at the Cambridge university, Longfellow, Felton, Jared Sparks, are noble fellows. So is Kenyon's friend, Ticknor.[305] Bancroft is a famous man; a straightforward, manly, earnest heart; and talks much of you, which is a great comfort. Doctor Channing I will tell you more of, after I have breakfasted alone with him next Wednesday. . . . Sumner is of great service to me. . . . The president of the Senate here presides at my dinner on Tuesday. Lord Mulgrave lingered with us till last Tuesday (we had our little captain to dinner on the Monday), and then went on to Canada. Kate is quite well, and so is Anne, whose smartness surpasses belief. They yearn for home, and so do I.
The last update to this letter, from which many of the most vivid pages of the Notes (including the bright, quirky picture of Boston streets) were taken with minor changes, was dated January 29th: "I hardly know what else to add to this long and disconnected story. Dana, the author of Two Years Before the Mast" (a book I had often praised to him, thinking it similar to Defoe), "is a really nice guy; and he doesn't look at all like what you'd expect. He’s short, mild-looking, and has a face that shows signs of wear. His father looks exactly like George Cruikshank after a night of fun—only shorter. The professors at Cambridge, Longfellow, Felton, Jared Sparks, are great guys. So is Kenyon's friend, Ticknor.[305] Bancroft is a well-known figure; he's straightforward, genuine, and has a sincere heart; he talks a lot about you, which is very comforting. I'll tell you more about Doctor Channing after I've had breakfast alone with him next Wednesday. . . . Sumner is really helpful to me. . . . The president of the Senate is hosting my dinner on Tuesday. Lord Mulgrave stayed with us until last Tuesday (we had our little captain to dinner on Monday), and then he headed to Canada. Kate is doing well, and so is Anne, whose cleverness is hard to believe. They both miss home, and so do I.
"Of course you will not see in the papers any true account of our voyage, for they keep the dangers of the passage, when there are any, very quiet. I observed so many perils peculiar to steamers that I am still undecided whether we shall not return by one of the New York liners. On the night of the storm, I was wondering within myself where we should be, if the chimney were blown overboard; in which case, it needs no great observation to discover that the vessel must be instantly on fire from stem to stern. When I went on deck next day, I saw that it was held up by a perfect forest of chains and ropes, which had been rigged in the night. Hewitt told me (when we were on shore, not before) that they had men lashed, hoisted up, and swinging there, all through the gale, getting these stays about it. This is not agreeable—is it?
"Of course, you won't read any real account of our trip in the papers because they keep the dangers of the journey quiet, especially when there are any. I noticed so many risks specific to steamships that I'm still unsure whether we should return on one of the New York liners. On the night of the storm, I kept wondering where we would be if the smokestack were to get blown overboard; in that case, it doesn't take much to realize that the ship would be instantly ablaze from front to back. The next day, when I went on deck, I saw it was supported by a web of chains and ropes that had been set up overnight. Hewitt told me (when we were on land, not before) that they had men tied up, hoisted, and swinging there throughout the storm, securing those stays. This isn't exactly pleasant, is it?"
"I wonder whether you will remember that next Tuesday is my birthday! This letter will leave here that morning.
"I wonder if you'll remember that next Tuesday is my birthday! This letter will be sent out that morning."
"On looking back through these sheets, I am astonished to find how little I have told you, and how much[306] I have, even now, in store which shall be yours by word of mouth. The American poor, the American factories, the institutions of all kinds—I have a book, already. There is no man in this town, or in this State of New England, who has not a blazing fire and a meat dinner every day of his life. A flaming sword in the air would not attract so much attention as a beggar in the streets. There are no charity uniforms, no wearisome repetition of the same dull ugly dress, in that blind school.[46] All are attired after their own tastes, and every boy and girl has his or her individuality as distinct and unimpaired as you would find it in their own homes. At the theatres, all the ladies sit in the fronts of the boxes. The gallery are as quiet as the dress circle at dear Drury Lane. A man with seven heads would be no sight at all, compared with one who couldn't read and write.
"Looking back through these pages, I’m surprised by how little I’ve shared with you and how much more I still have to tell you in person. I already have a book about the American poor, the American factories, and various institutions. There isn't a man in this town or anywhere in New England who doesn't have a warm fire and a meat dinner every day. A flaming sword in the air wouldn't get as much attention as a beggar on the streets. There are no charity uniforms or boring, repetitive outfits in that blind school. Everyone dresses according to their own style, and each boy and girl has their individuality as distinct and complete as you'd find in their own homes. At the theaters, all the ladies sit at the front of the boxes. The audience in the gallery is just as quiet as the dress circle at dear Drury Lane. A man with seven heads wouldn’t be nearly as shocking as someone who can’t read or write."
"I won't speak (I say 'speak'! I wish I could) about the dear precious children, because I know how much we shall hear about them when we receive those letters from home for which we long so ardently."
"I won't talk (I say 'talk'! I wish I could) about the dear precious children, because I know we'll hear so much about them when we get those letters from home that we've been longing for."
Unmistakably to be seen, in this earliest of his letters, is the quite fresh and unalloyed impression first received by him at this memorable visit; and it is due, as well to himself as to the great country which welcomed him, that this should be considered independently[307] of any modification it afterwards underwent. Of the fervency and universality of the welcome there could indeed be no doubt, and as little that it sprang from feelings honorable both to giver and receiver. The sources of Dickens's popularity in England were in truth multiplied many-fold in America. The hearty, cordial, and humane side of his genius had fascinated them quite as much; but there was also something beyond this. The cheerful temper that had given new beauty to the commonest forms of life, the abounding humor which had added largely to all innocent enjoyment, the honorable and in those days rare distinction of America which left no home in the Union inaccessible to such advantages, had made Dickens the object everywhere of grateful admiration, for the most part of personal affection. But even this was not all. I do not say it either to lessen or to increase the value of the tribute, but to express simply what it was; and there cannot be a question that the young English author, whom by his language they claimed equally for their own, was almost universally regarded by the Americans as a kind of embodied protest against what they believed to be worst in the institutions of England, depressing and overshadowing in a social sense, and adverse to purely intellectual influences. In all the papers of every grade in the Union, of which many were sent to me at the time, the feeling of triumph over the mother-country in this particular is everywhere predominant. You Worship titles, they said, and military heroes, and millionaires, and we of the New World want to show you, by extending the kind of homage that the Old World reserves for kings and conquerors,[308] to a young man with nothing to distinguish him but his heart and his genius, what it is we think in these parts worthier of honor, than birth, or wealth, a title, or a sword. Well, there was something in this too, apart from a mere crowing over the mother-country. The Americans had honestly more than a common share in the triumphs of a genius which in more than one sense had made the deserts and wildernesses of life to blossom like the rose. They were entitled to select for a welcome, as emphatic as they might please to render it, the writer who pre-eminently in his generation had busied himself to "detect and save," in human creatures, such sparks of virtue as misery or vice had not availed to extinguish; to discover what is beautiful and comely under what commonly passes for the ungainly and the deformed; to draw happiness and hopefulness from despair itself; and, above all, so to have made known to his own countrymen the wants and sufferings of the poor, the ignorant, and the neglected, that they could be left in absolute neglect no more. "A triumph has been prepared for him," wrote Mr. Ticknor to our dear friend Kenyon, "in which the whole country will join. He will have a progress through the States unequaled since Lafayette's." Daniel Webster told the Americans that Dickens had done more already to ameliorate the condition of the English poor than all the statesmen Great Britain had sent into Parliament. His sympathies are such, exclaimed Dr. Channing, as to recommend him in an especial manner to us. He seeks out that class, in order to benefit them, with whom American institutions and laws sympathize most strongly; and it is in the passions,[309] sufferings, and virtues of the mass that he has found his subjects of most thrilling interest. "He shows that life in its rudest form may wear a tragic grandeur; that amidst follies and excesses, provoking laughter or scorn, the moral feelings do not wholly die; and that the haunts of the blackest crime are sometimes lighted up by the presence and influence of the noblest souls. His pictures have a tendency to awaken sympathy with our race, and to change the unfeeling indifference which has prevailed towards the depressed multitude, into a sorrowful and indignant sensibility to their wrongs and woes."
In this earliest of his letters, you can clearly see the fresh and genuine impression he received during that memorable visit. It's important to acknowledge that this perception comes from both him and the great country that welcomed him, and it should be viewed independently of any changes it later underwent. There was no doubt about the warmth and universality of the welcome he received, nor that it stemmed from feelings that were honorable to both the giver and the receiver. Dickens's popularity in England was significantly amplified in America. They were just as captivated by the heartfelt, kind, and humane aspects of his genius, but there was even more to it. The cheerful spirit that brought new life to the simplest of everyday moments, the abundant humor that enhanced innocent pleasures, and the unique pride of America, which ensured that no home was inaccessible to such benefits, made Dickens an object of widespread admiration, and often personal affection. But that wasn't all. I'm not saying this to diminish or inflate the importance of the tribute; I simply want to express what it was. There’s no question that the young English author, whom they claimed as their own through his language, was seen by Americans as a kind of living protest against what they viewed as the worst aspects of English institutions, which were socially oppressive and detrimental to intellectual growth. In countless newspapers across the Union, many of which were sent to me at the time, there was a consistent sense of triumph over the mother country. They said, “You worship titles, military heroes, and millionaires, while we in the New World want to demonstrate, by giving the same kind of respect that the Old World reserves for kings and conquerors, to a young man distinguished only by his heart and genius, what we believe is worthier of honor than birth, wealth, a title, or a sword.” There was something to this, beyond just boasting over the mother country. Americans genuinely had more than a shared stake in the achievements of a genius who had, in a very real sense, made the harshest aspects of life bloom like roses. They had every right to choose an emphatic welcome for the writer who, more than anyone else in his time, dedicated himself to “detecting and saving” the flickers of virtue in people that misery or vice hadn’t extinguished; to finding beauty and grace where most saw only the ugly and deformed; to drawing happiness and hope from despair; and, above all, to revealing to his fellow countrymen the needs and struggles of the poor, the ignorant, and the neglected, ensuring that these groups could not be ignored any longer. "A triumph has been prepared for him," Mr. Ticknor wrote to our dear friend Kenyon, "in which the whole country will join. He will have a journey through the States unmatched since Lafayette's." Daniel Webster told Americans that Dickens had already done more to improve the situation of the English poor than all the statesmen Britain had sent to Parliament. Dr. Channing exclaimed that his sympathies especially recommended him to us. He seeks out that class with whom American institutions and laws resonate most deeply, and in the struggles, sufferings, and virtues of the masses, he has found his most compelling subjects. "He shows that life, even in its harshest form, can possess a tragic grandeur; that amidst foolishness and excesses that provoke laughter or scorn, moral feelings do not completely vanish; and that the darkest places of crime can be illuminated by the presence and influence of the noblest souls. His stories inspire sympathy for our humanity and transform the apathy that has existed towards the oppressed into a sorrowful and indignant awareness of their wrongs and suffering."
Whatever may be the turn which we are to see the welcome take, by dissatisfaction that arose on both sides, it is well that we should thus understand what in its first manifestations was honorable to both. Dickens had his disappointments, and the Americans had theirs; but what was really genuine in the first enthusiasm remained without grave alloy from either; and the letters, as I proceed to give them, will so naturally explain and illustrate the misunderstanding as to require little further comment. I am happy to be able here to place on record fac-similes of the invitations to the public entertainments in New York which reached him before he quitted Boston. The mere signatures suffice to show how universal the welcome was from that great city of the Union.
Whatever direction the welcome might take due to the dissatisfaction that arose on both sides, it's important to recognize what was initially honorable for both. Dickens faced his letdowns, and the Americans had theirs; however, what was truly genuine in the early excitement remained largely unaffected by either side. The letters that I will present will clearly explain and illustrate the misunderstandings, requiring little additional commentary. I'm glad to include here copies of the invitations to the public events in New York that were sent to him before he left Boston. The signatures alone show how widespread the welcome was from that major city of the Union.
CHAPTER XX.
SECOND IMPRESSIONS OF AMERICA.
1842.
His second letter, radiant with the same kindly warmth that gave always pre-eminent charm to his genius, was dated from the Carlton Hotel, New York, on the 14th February, but its only allusion of any public interest was to the beginning of his agitation of the question of international copyright. He went to America[311] with no express intention of starting this question in any way, and certainly with no belief that such remark upon it as a person in his position could alone be expected to make would be resented strongly by any sections of the American people. But he was not long left in doubt on this head. He had spoken upon it twice publicly, "to the great indignation of some of the editors here, who are attacking me for so doing, right and left." On the other hand, all the best men had assured him that, if only at once followed up in England, the blow struck might bring about a change in the law; and, yielding to the pleasant hope that the best men could be a match for the worst, he urged me to enlist on his side what force I could, and in particular, as he had made Scott's claim his war-cry, to bring Lockhart into the field. I could not do much, but I did what I could.
His second letter, glowing with the same friendly warmth that always made his genius so charming, was sent from the Carlton Hotel, New York, on February 14th. Its only mention of any public interest was his campaign for international copyright. He went to America[311] without any specific plan to raise this issue and certainly didn't expect that any comments from someone in his position would be met with strong resistance from any part of the American public. But he soon found out he was mistaken. He had publicly discussed it twice, "to the great indignation of some of the editors here, who are attacking me for doing so, left and right." On the flip side, all the right-minded people assured him that if followed up immediately in England, the point he raised might lead to a change in the law. Encouraged by the hope that the right people could overcome the wrong ones, he urged me to rally any support I could, especially since he had made Scott's claim his battle cry, to bring Lockhart into the mix. I couldn't do much, but I did what I could.
Three days later he began another letter; and, as this will be entirely new to the reader, I shall print it as it reached me, with only such omission of matter concerning myself as I think it my duty, however reluctantly, to make throughout these extracts. There was nothing in its personal details, or in those relating to international copyright, available for his Notes; from which they were excluded by the two rules he observed in that book,—the first to be altogether silent as to the copyright discussion, and the second to abstain from all mention of individuals. But there can be no harm here in violating either rule, for, as Sydney Smith said with his humorous sadness, "We are all dead now."
Three days later, he started writing another letter. Since this will be completely new to the reader, I’ll share it exactly as I received it, omitting only the parts related to myself that I feel obliged to, even if I do so reluctantly, throughout these excerpts. There was nothing in its personal details or anything related to international copyright relevant for his Notes; which were excluded by the two rules he followed in that book—the first being to remain completely silent about the copyright discussion, and the second to avoid mentioning any individuals. However, there’s no harm in breaking either rule here, because, as Sydney Smith said with his wry humor, "We are all dead now."
"Carlton House, New York: Thursday, February Seventeenth, 1842. . . . As there is a sailing-packet[312] from here to England to-morrow which is warranted (by the owners) to be a marvelous fast sailer, and as it appears most probable that she will reach home (I write the word with a pang) before the Cunard steamer of next month, I indite this letter. And lest this letter should reach you before another letter which I dispatched from here last Monday, let me say in the first place that I did dispatch a brief epistle to you on that day, together with a newspaper, and a pamphlet touching the Boz ball; and that I put in the post-office at Boston another newspaper for you containing an account of the dinner, which was just about to come off, you remember, when I wrote to you from that city.
"Carlton House, New York: Thursday, February Seventeenth, 1842. . . . There’s a sailing packet[312] leaving for England tomorrow that the owners say is a really fast ship, and it seems likely that it will get home (I say that with a heavy heart) before the Cunard steamer next month, so I’m writing this letter. Also, in case this letter arrives before another one I sent from here last Monday, I want to clarify that I did send a short letter to you on that day along with a newspaper and a pamphlet about the Boz ball; and I also mailed another newspaper for you from Boston that had details about the dinner that was just about to happen when I wrote to you from there."
"It was a most superb affair; and the speaking admirable. Indeed, the general talent for public speaking here is one of the most striking of the things that force themselves upon an Englishman's notice. As every man looks on to being a member of Congress, every man prepares himself for it; and the result is quite surprising. You will observe one odd custom,—the drinking of sentiments. It is quite extinct with us, but here everybody is expected to be prepared with an epigram as a matter of course.
"It was an impressive event, and the speeches were remarkable. In fact, the general skill for public speaking here is one of the most striking things that catches an Englishman's attention. Just as every man aspires to be a member of Congress, everyone prepares for it, and the outcome is quite astonishing. You’ll notice one unusual tradition—the toasting of sentiments. It's completely fallen out of practice with us, but here, everyone is expected to have a clever phrase ready to share."
"We left Boston on the fifth, and went away with the governor of the city to stay till Monday at his house at Worcester. He married a sister of Bancroft's, and another sister of Bancroft's went down with us. The village of Worcester is one of the prettiest in New England. . . . On Monday morning at nine o'clock we started again by railroad and went on to Springfield, where a deputation of two were waiting, and everything was in readiness that the utmost attention could suggest.[313] Owing to the mildness of the weather, the Connecticut river was 'open,' videlicet not frozen, and they had a steamboat ready to carry us on to Hartford; thus saving a land-journey of only twenty-five miles, but on such roads at this time of year that it takes nearly twelve hours to accomplish! The boat was very small, the river full of floating blocks of ice, and the depth where we went (to avoid the ice and the current) not more than a few inches. After two hours and a half of this queer traveling, we got to Hartford. There, there was quite an English inn; except in respect of the bedrooms, which are always uncomfortable; and the best committee of management that has yet presented itself. They kept us more quiet, and were more considerate and thoughtful, even to their own exclusion, than any I have yet had to deal with. Kate's face being horribly bad, I determined to give her a rest here; and accordingly wrote to get rid of my engagement at New Haven, on that plea. We remained in this town until the eleventh: holding a formal levee every day for two hours, and receiving on each from two hundred to three hundred people. At five o'clock on the afternoon of the eleventh, we set off (still by railroad) for New Haven, which we reached about eight o'clock. The moment we had had tea, we were forced to open another levee for the students and professors of the college (the largest in the States), and the townspeople. I suppose we shook hands, before going to bed, with considerably more than five hundred people; and I stood, as a matter of course, the whole time. . . .
"We left Boston on the fifth and traveled with the governor of the city to his home in Worcester, where we stayed until Monday. He is married to one of Bancroft's sisters, and another sister of Bancroft's joined us on the trip. Worcester is one of the prettiest villages in New England. . . . On Monday morning at nine o'clock, we set off again by train and went on to Springfield, where two representatives were waiting for us and everything was prepared with the utmost care. [313] Because the weather was mild, the Connecticut River was 'open,' which means it wasn't frozen, and they had a steamboat ready to take us to Hartford, saving us a land journey of just twenty-five miles; but on the roads at this time of year, it takes almost twelve hours to get there! The boat was very small, the river was full of floating ice, and we traveled in water that was only a few inches deep to avoid the ice and the current. After two and a half hours of this strange journey, we arrived in Hartford. There, we found a pretty English-style inn, although the bedrooms were always uncomfortable, and the best management committee yet encountered. They kept us more peaceful and were more considerate and thoughtful—even to the point of excluding themselves—than any I’ve dealt with so far. Since Kate's face was looking really bad, I decided to give her a break here and wrote to cancel my engagement in New Haven for that reason. We stayed in town until the eleventh, holding a formal reception every day for two hours, receiving between two hundred to three hundred people each time. At five o'clock on the afternoon of the eleventh, we left (still by train) for New Haven, which we reached around eight o'clock. As soon as we had tea, we had to open another reception for the students and professors of the largest college in the States, as well as the townspeople. I think we shook hands with considerably more than five hundred people before going to bed, and I stood the whole time, as was expected. . . . "
"Now, the deputation of two had come on with us from Hartford; and at New Haven there was another[314] committee; and the immense fatigue and worry of all this, no words can exaggerate. We had been in the morning over jails and deaf and dumb asylums; had stopped on the journey at a place called Wallingford, where a whole town had turned out to see me, and to gratify whose curiosity the train stopped expressly; had had a day of great excitement and exertion on the Thursday (this being Friday); and were inexpressibly worn out. And when at last we got to bed and were 'going' to fall asleep, the choristers of the college turned out in a body, under the window, and serenaded us! We had had, by-the-by, another serenade at Hartford, from a Mr. Adams (a nephew of John Quincy Adams) and a German friend. They were most beautiful singers: and when they began, in the dead of the night, in a long, musical, echoing passage outside our chamber door; singing, in low voices to guitars, about home and absent friends and other topics that they knew would interest us; we were more moved than I can tell you. In the midst of my sentimentality, though, a thought occurred to me which made me laugh so immoderately that I was obliged to cover my face with the bedclothes. 'Good Heavens!' I said to Kate, 'what a monstrously ridiculous and commonplace appearance my boots must have, outside the door!' I never was so impressed with a sense of the absurdity of boots, in all my life.
"Now, two representatives had joined us from Hartford, and there was another committee in New Haven; you can't overstate the sheer exhaustion and stress of all this. That morning, we had visited jails and schools for the deaf and mute; we made a stop in a place called Wallingford, where the entire town had come out to see me, and the train had actually paused just for them. We had an incredibly eventful and tiring day on Thursday (today is Friday), and we were utterly worn out. Finally, when we went to bed and were about to drift off, the college choir came together right under our window and serenaded us! By the way, we had another serenade in Hartford from a Mr. Adams (a nephew of John Quincy Adams) and a German friend. They were incredible singers: when they started in the still of the night, in a long, melodious passage outside our door, softly strumming guitars and singing about home and absent friends and other topics they knew would resonate with us, we were deeply touched. In the middle of my sentimental moment, though, I had a thought that made me laugh so hard I had to cover my face with the bedclothes. 'Good heavens!' I said to Kate, 'my boots must look ridiculously ordinary out there by the door!' I had never felt so aware of the absurdity of boots in my life."
"The New Haven serenade was not so good; though there were a great many voices, and a 'reg'lar' band. It hadn't the heart of the other. Before it was six hours old, we were dressing with might and main, and making ready for our departure; it being a drive of[315] twenty minutes to the steamboat, and the hour of sailing nine o'clock. After a hasty breakfast we started off; and after another levee on the deck (actually on the deck), and 'three times three for Dickens,' moved towards New York.
"The New Haven serenade wasn't very good, even though there were a lot of voices and a regular band. It just didn't have the soul of the other one. By the time it was six hours old, we were getting ready to leave, since it was a twenty-minute drive to the steamboat and we needed to set sail at nine o'clock. After a quick breakfast, we took off; and after another reception on the deck (actually on the deck), and 'three cheers for Dickens,' we moved toward New York."
"I was delighted to find on board a Mr. Felton whom I had known at Boston. He is the Greek professor at Cambridge, and was going on to the ball and dinner. Like most men of his class whom I have seen, he is a most delightful fellow,—unaffected, hearty, genial, jolly; quite an Englishman of the best sort. We drank all the porter on board, ate all the cold pork and cheese, and were very merry indeed. I should have told you, in its proper place, that both at Hartford and New Haven a regular bank was subscribed, by these committees, for all my expenses. No bill was to be got at the bar, and everything was paid for. But as I would on no account suffer this to be done, I stoutly and positively refused to budge an inch until Mr. Q. should have received the bills from the landlord's own hands, and paid them to the last farthing. Finding it impossible to move me, they suffered me, most unwillingly, to carry the point.
"I was thrilled to find Mr. Felton on board, who I had known in Boston. He’s the Greek professor at Cambridge and was heading to the ball and dinner. Like most guys from his background that I’ve come across, he’s a really great guy—down to earth, warm, friendly, and cheerful; truly an exemplary Englishman. We finished off all the porter on board, devoured all the cold pork and cheese, and had a blast. I should have mentioned earlier that in Hartford and New Haven, a regular bank was set up by these committees to cover all my expenses. No one was supposed to get a bill at the bar, and everything was prepaid. However, I refused to let that happen and staunchly insisted that I wouldn't budge until Mr. Q had received the bills directly from the landlord and paid them down to the last penny. Realizing they couldn't change my mind, they reluctantly allowed me to have my way."
"About half-past 2 we arrived here. In half an hour more, we reached this hotel, where a very splendid suite of rooms was prepared for us; and where everything is very comfortable, and no doubt (as at Boston) enormously dear. Just as we sat down to dinner, David Golden made his appearance; and when he had gone, and we were taking our wine, Washington Irving came in alone, with open arms. And here he stopped, until ten o'clock at night." (Through Lord Jeffrey, with[316] whom he was connected by marriage, and Macready, of whom he was the cordial friend, we already knew Mr. Colden; and his subsequent visits to Europe led to many years' intimate intercourse, greatly enjoyed by us both.) "Having got so far, I shall divide my discourse into four points. First, the ball. Secondly, some slight specimens of a certain phase of character in the Americans. Thirdly, international copyright. Fourthly, my life here, and projects to be carried out while I remain.
"About 2:30, we got here. In another half hour, we reached the hotel, where a really nice suite of rooms had been prepared for us, and where everything is super comfortable, though probably (like in Boston) incredibly expensive. Just as we sat down to dinner, David Golden showed up; and after he left, while we were enjoying our wine, Washington Irving came in by himself, welcoming us warmly. He stayed until 10 o'clock that night." (Through Lord Jeffrey, who was related to him by marriage, and Macready, who was his good friend, we already knew Mr. Colden; and his later visits to Europe led to many years of close interaction, which we both greatly enjoyed.) "Having come this far, I'll break my conversation into four points. First, the ball. Second, a few examples of a certain aspect of American character. Third, international copyright. Fourth, my life here and the plans I want to accomplish while I'm here."
"Firstly, the ball. It came off last Monday (vide pamphlet.) 'At a quarter-past 9, exactly' (I quote the printed order of proceeding), we were waited upon by 'David Colden, Esquire, and General George Morris;' habited, the former in full ball costume, the latter in the full dress uniform of Heaven knows what regiment of militia. The general took Kate, Golden gave his arm to me, and we proceeded downstairs to a carriage at the door, which took us to the stage-door of the theatre, greatly to the disappointment of an enormous crowd who were besetting the main door and making a most tremendous hullaballoo. The scene on our entrance was very striking. There were three thousand people present in full dress; from the roof to the floor, the theatre was decorated magnificently; and the light, glitter, glare, show, noise, and cheering, baffle my descriptive powers. We were walked in through the centre of the centre dress-box, the front whereof was taken out for the occasion; so to the back of the stage, where the mayor and other dignitaries received us; and we were then paraded all round the enormous ball-room, twice, for the gratification of the many-headed.[317] That done, we began to dance—Heaven knows how we did it, for there was no room. And we continued dancing until, being no longer able even to stand, we slipped away quietly, and came back to the hotel. All the documents connected with this extraordinary festival (quite unparalleled here) we have preserved; so you may suppose that on this head alone we shall have enough to show you when we come home. The bill of fare for supper is, in its amount and extent, quite a curiosity.
"First off, the ball. It took place last Monday (see pamphlet). 'At exactly a quarter-past 9' (I’m quoting the printed schedule), we were joined by 'David Colden, Esquire, and General George Morris;' the former in full ball attire, and the latter in the full dress uniform of who knows what militia. The general took Kate, Colden offered his arm to me, and we headed downstairs to a carriage at the door, which drove us to the stage door of the theater, much to the disappointment of a huge crowd gathered at the main entrance making a tremendous racket. The scene upon our arrival was quite striking. There were three thousand people in formal wear; the theater was lavishly decorated from the ceiling to the floor; and the light, sparkle, glare, spectacle, noise, and cheers overwhelmed my ability to describe it. We were led in through the center of the center box, the front of which was removed for the occasion; then to the back of the stage, where the mayor and other dignitaries welcomed us; and we were then paraded around the massive ballroom twice, much to the delight of the crowd. After that, we started dancing—God knows how we managed it, as there was hardly any space. We kept dancing until we were no longer able to stand, then quietly slipped away and returned to the hotel. We’ve preserved all the documents related to this extraordinary festival (truly unmatched here); so you can imagine that we’ll have plenty to show you when we get home. The supper menu is, in terms of its variety and quantity, quite a curiosity."
"Now, the phase of character in the Americans which amuses me most was put before me in its most amusing shape by the circumstances attending this affair. I had noticed it before, and have since; but I cannot better illustrate it than by reference to this theme. Of course I can do nothing but in some shape or other it gets into the newspapers. All manner of lies get there, and occasionally a truth so twisted and distorted that it has as much resemblance to the real fact as Quilp's leg to Taglioni's. But with this ball to come off, the newspapers were if possible unusually loquacious; and in their accounts of me, and my seeings, sayings, and doings on the Saturday night and Sunday before, they describe my manner, mode of speaking, dressing, and so forth. In doing this, they report that I am a very charming fellow (of course), and have a very free and easy way with me; 'which,' say they, 'at first amused a few fashionables;' but soon pleased them exceedingly. Another paper, coming after the ball, dwells upon its splendor and brilliancy; hugs itself and its readers upon all that Dickens saw, and winds up by gravely expressing its conviction that[318] Dickens was never in such society in England as he has seen in New York, and that its high and striking tone cannot fail to make an indelible impression on his mind! For the same reason I am always represented, whenever I appear in public, as being 'very pale;' 'apparently thunderstruck;' and utterly confounded by all I see. . . . You recognize the queer vanity which is at the root of all this? I have plenty of stories in connection with it to amuse you with when I return."
"Now, the aspect of American character that I find most entertaining was brought to my attention in the most amusing way by the circumstances surrounding this event. I had noticed it before, and I still do; but I can best illustrate it by referring to this theme. Of course, whatever I do somehow ends up in the newspapers. All kinds of lies are published, and occasionally a truth so twisted and distorted that it bears as much resemblance to the real fact as Quilp's leg does to Taglioni's. But with this upcoming ball, the newspapers were unusually talkative; and in their accounts of me, my conversations, and my actions on the Saturday night and Sunday before, they describe my style, way of speaking, outfit, and so forth. In doing this, they report that I am a very charming guy (naturally) and that I have a very relaxed and easygoing demeanor; 'which,' they say, 'at first amused a few fashionable people;' but soon, they greatly enjoyed it. Another publication, post-ball, focuses on its splendor and brilliance; it revels in everything Dickens experienced and concludes by seriously declaring its belief that Dickens has never been in such company in England as he found in New York, and that its high and striking atmosphere will surely leave a lasting impression on his mind! For the same reason, I am always depicted, whenever I appear in public, as being 'very pale;' 'apparently shocked;' and completely bewildered by everything I see. . . . Do you recognize the peculiar vanity at the heart of all this? I have plenty of stories related to it that will amuse you when I return."
"It is unnecessary to say . . . that this letter didn't come by the sailing packet, and will come by the Cunard boat. After the ball I was laid up with a very bad sore throat, which confined me to the house four whole days; and as I was unable to write, or indeed to do anything but doze and drink lemonade, I missed the ship. . . . I have still a horrible cold, and so has Kate, but in other respects we are all right. I proceed to my third head: the international copyright question.
"It goes without saying that this letter didn't come by the sailing packet, and will come by the Cunard boat. After the ball, I was stuck at home with a really bad sore throat, which kept me indoors for four entire days. Since I couldn’t write or do anything except doze and drink lemonade, I missed the ship. I still have a horrible cold, and so does Kate, but otherwise we're doing fine. Now, moving on to my third point: the international copyright question."
"I believe there is no country on the face of the earth where there is less freedom of opinion on any subject in reference to which there is a broad difference of opinion, than in this.—There!—I write the words with reluctance, disappointment, and sorrow; but I believe it from the bottom of my soul. I spoke, as you know, of international copyright, at Boston; and I spoke of it again at Hartford. My friends were paralyzed with wonder at such audacious daring. The notion that I, a man alone by himself, in America, should venture to suggest to the Americans that there was one point on which they were neither just to their[319] own countrymen nor to us, actually struck the boldest dumb! Washington Irving, Prescott, Hoffman, Bryant, Halleck, Dana, Washington Allston—every man who writes in this country is devoted to the question, and not one of them dares to raise his voice and complain of the atrocious state of the law. It is nothing that of all men living I am the greatest loser by it. It is nothing that I have a claim to speak and be heard. The wonder is that a breathing man can be found with temerity enough to suggest to the Americans the possibility of their having done wrong. I wish you could have seen the faces that I saw, down both sides of the table at Hartford, when I began to talk about Scott. I wish you could have heard how I gave it out. My blood so boiled as I thought of the monstrous injustice that I felt as if I were twelve feet high when I thrust it down their throats.
"I believe there is no country on earth where there's less freedom to express opinions on subjects where there's a significant difference of views than here. There! I write this with reluctance, disappointment, and sadness, but I truly believe it. As you know, I spoke about international copyright in Boston and again in Hartford. My friends were stunned by such boldness. The idea that I, a man on my own in America, would dare to suggest to Americans that they were being unfair to their own countrymen as well as to us left even the boldest speechless! Washington Irving, Prescott, Hoffman, Bryant, Halleck, Dana, Washington Allston—every writer in this country is committed to the issue, yet not one of them dares to raise their voice and call out the appalling state of the law. It means nothing that I am the one suffering the most from it. It means nothing that I have a right to speak and be heard. The real surprise is that anyone would be brave enough to suggest to Americans that they might have made a mistake. I wish you could have seen the expressions on the faces around the table in Hartford when I started talking about Scott. I wish you could have heard how passionately I delivered my message. My blood was boiling as I thought of the outrageous injustice; I felt like I was twelve feet tall as I forcefully made them listen."
"I had no sooner made that second speech than such an outcry began (for the purpose of deterring me from doing the like in this city) as an Englishman can form no notion of. Anonymous letters, verbal dissuasions; newspaper attacks making Colt (a murderer who is attracting great attention here) an angel by comparison with me; assertions that I was no gentleman, but a mere mercenary scoundrel; coupled with the most monstrous misrepresentations relative to my design and purpose in visiting the United States; came pouring in upon me every day. The dinner committee here (composed of the first gentlemen in America, remember that) were so dismayed, that they besought me not to pursue the subject, although they every one agreed with me. I answered that I would. That nothing should[320] deter me. . . . That the shame was theirs, not mine; and that as I would not spare them when I got home, I would not be silenced here. Accordingly, when the night came, I asserted my right, with all the means I could command to give it dignity, in face, manner, or words; and I believe that if you could have seen and heard me, you would have loved me better for it than ever you did in your life.
I had barely finished that second speech when an uproar started (to try to stop me from doing it again in this city) that no Englishman could ever imagine. Anonymous letters, verbal discouragement; newspaper articles making Colt (a murderer who is getting a lot of attention here) look like an angel compared to me; claims that I wasn't a gentleman, but just a greedy scoundrel; along with the most outrageous lies about my intentions and purpose for visiting the United States came flooding in every day. The dinner committee here (made up of the top gentlemen in America, remember that) were so shocked that they begged me not to continue on the subject, even though they all agreed with me. I told them I would. That nothing would deter me. . . . That the shame was theirs, not mine; and that since I would not hold back once I got home, I wouldn’t be silenced here either. So, when the night arrived, I asserted my right, with all the means I could muster to give it the respect it deserved, in face, manner, or words; and I believe that if you could have seen and heard me, you would have loved me even more than you ever did in your life.
"The New York Herald, which you will receive with this, is the Satirist of America; but having a great circulation (on account of its commercial intelligence and early news) it can afford to secure the best reporters. . . . My speech is done, upon the whole, with remarkable accuracy. There are a great many typographical errors in it; and by the omission of one or two words, or the substitution of one word for another, it is often materially weakened. Thus, I did not say that I 'claimed' my right, but that I 'asserted' it; and I did not say that I had 'some claim,' but that I had 'a most righteous claim,' to speak. But altogether it is very correct."
The New York Herald, which you will receive with this, is the Satirist of America; but because it has a large circulation (thanks to its business news and early updates), it can afford to hire the best reporters. . . . My speech is mostly accurate. There are quite a few typing mistakes in it; and by leaving out one or two words, or replacing one word with another, it often loses its impact. So, I didn’t say that I 'claimed' my right, but that I 'asserted' it; and I didn’t say that I had 'some claim,' but that I had 'a most righteous claim,' to speak. But overall, it is very accurate.
Washington Irving was chairman of this dinner, and, having from the first a dread that he should break down in his speech, the catastrophe came accordingly. Near him sat the Cambridge professor who had come with Dickens by boat from New Haven, with whom already a warm friendship had been formed that lasted for life, and who has pleasantly sketched what happened. Mr. Felton saw Irving constantly in the interval of preparation, and could not but despond at his daily iterated foreboding of I shall certainly break down; though besides[321] the real dread there was a sly humor which heightened its whimsical horror with an irresistible drollery. But the professor plucked up hope a little when the night came and he saw that Irving had laid under his plate the manuscript of his speech. During dinner, nevertheless, his old foreboding cry was still heard, and "at last the moment arrived; Mr. Irving rose; and the deafening and long-continued applause by no means lessened his apprehension. He began in his pleasant voice; got through two or three sentences pretty easily, but in the next hesitated; and, after one or two attempts to go on, gave it up, with a graceful allusion to the tournament and the troop of knights all armed and eager for the fray; and ended with the toast Charles Dickens, the guest of the nation. There! said he, as he resumed his seat amid applause as great as had greeted his rising, There! I told you I should break down, and I've done it!" He was in London a few months later, on his way to Spain; and I heard Thomas Moore describe[47] at Rogers's table the difficulty there had been to overcome his reluctance, because of this break-down, to go to the dinner of the Literary Fund on the occasion of Prince Albert's presiding. "However," said Moore, "I told him only to attempt a few words, and I suggested what they should be, and he said he'd never thought of anything so easy, and he went, and did famously." I knew very well, as I listened, that this had not been the result; but as the distinguished American had found himself, on this second occasion, not among orators as in New York, but among men as unable as[322] himself to speak in public, and equally able to do better things,[48] he was doubtless more reconciled to his own failure. I have been led to this digression by Dickens's silence on his friend's break-down. He had so great a love for Irving that it was painful to speak of him as at any disadvantage, and of the New York dinner he wrote only in its connection with his own copyright speeches.
Washington Irving was the chair of this dinner, and he had a fear from the start that he would mess up his speech, which unfortunately happened. Next to him was the Cambridge professor who traveled with Dickens by boat from New Haven, and they had formed a strong friendship that lasted a lifetime, with the professor fondly recalling the events. Mr. Felton saw Irving often during the preparation period and couldn’t help but feel concerned at his constant repetition of, I’m definitely going to mess up; even though his real fear was mixed with a sneakiness that added a humorous touch to the situation. However, the professor felt a bit more hopeful when the night arrived, seeing that Irving had placed the manuscript of his speech under his plate. Still, during dinner, Irving's old fears echoed, and finally, the moment came; Mr. Irving stood up, and the loud and prolonged applause didn’t ease his nerves. He started speaking in his charming voice; he managed two or three sentences fairly well, but then he hesitated and, after a couple of attempts to continue, gave up, making a graceful reference to the tournament and the knights who were fully prepared for battle; he concluded with the toast Charles Dickens, the national guest. There! he exclaimed as he took his seat to applause that was just as loud as when he stood up, I told you I would break down, and I did! A few months later, while in London on his way to Spain, I heard Thomas Moore describe at Rogers's table how difficult it had been to convince Irving to attend the Literary Fund dinner where Prince Albert was the host due to his earlier breakdown. "However," Moore said, "I advised him to just say a few words, suggested what they should be, and he remarked he had never thought of anything so easy, and he went on and did great." I knew very well, as I listened, that this had not been the case; but since the distinguished American found himself this time not among orators like in New York, but among people just as unable to speak publicly as he was, who could communicate better in other ways, he was likely more at peace with his own shortcomings. I’ve been led to this diversion by Dickens's choice to stay silent about his friend's breakdown. He cared so much for Irving that it was hard for him to mention him in a negative light, and he only referred to the New York dinner in the context of his own speeches about copyright.
"The effect of all this copyright agitation at least has been to awaken a great sensation on both sides of the subject; the respectable newspapers and reviews taking up the cudgels as strongly in my favor, as the others have done against me. Some of the vagabonds take great credit to themselves (grant us patience!) for having made me popular by publishing my books in newspapers: as if there were no England, no Scotland, no Germany, no place but America in the whole world. A splendid satire upon this kind of trash has just occurred. A man came here yesterday, and demanded, not besought but demanded, pecuniary assistance; and fairly bullied Mr. Q. for money. When I came home, I dictated a letter to this effect,—that such applications reached me in vast numbers every day; that if I were[323] a man of fortune, I could not render assistance to all who sought it; and that, depending on my own exertion for all the help I could give, I regretted to say I could afford him none. Upon this, my gentleman sits down and writes me that he is an itinerant bookseller; that he is the first man who sold my books in New York; that he is distressed in the city where I am reveling in luxury; that he thinks it rather strange that the man who wrote Nickleby should be utterly destitute of feeling; and that he would have me 'take care I don't repent it.' What do you think of that?—as Mac would say. I thought it such a good commentary, that I dispatched the letter to the editor of the only English newspaper here, and told him he might print it if he liked.
"The impact of all this copyright debate has at least sparked a huge reaction on both sides of the issue; the respectable newspapers and reviews are strongly supporting me, just as others have opposed me. Some of the freeloaders take great pride in claiming (give us a break!) that they have made me popular by publishing my books in their newspapers: as if there were no England, no Scotland, no Germany, and no place but America in the entire world. A perfect satire on this kind of nonsense just happened. A man came here yesterday and demanded, not asked but demanded, financial help; he even bullied Mr. Q for money. When I got home, I dictated a letter saying that I receive countless requests like this every day; that if I were a wealthy man, I couldn't possibly assist everyone who asked; and that, relying on my own efforts for any support I could give, I regretted to say I couldn't help him. In response, my gentleman sits down and writes to tell me that he is a traveling bookseller; that he was the first person to sell my books in New York; that he is struggling in the city where I'm living in luxury; that he finds it quite strange that the author of Nickleby should be completely lacking in empathy; and that he wants me to 'make sure I don’t regret it.' What do you think of that?—as Mac would say. I thought it was such a great commentary that I sent the letter to the editor of the only English newspaper here and told him he could print it if he wanted."
"I will tell you what I should like, my dear friend, always supposing that your judgment concurs with mine, and that you would take the trouble to get such a document. I should like to have a short letter addressed to me by the principal English authors who signed the international copyright petition, expressive of their sense that I have done my duty to the cause. I am sure I deserve it, but I don't wish it on that ground. It is because its publication in the best journals here would unquestionably do great good. As the gauntlet is down, let us go on. Clay has already sent a gentleman to me express from Washington (where I shall be on the 6th or 7th of next month) to declare his strong interest in the matter, his cordial approval of the 'manly' course I have held in reference to it, and his desire to stir in it if possible. I have lighted up such a blaze that a meeting of the foremost people[324] on the other side (very respectfully and properly conducted in reference to me, personally, I am bound to say) was held in this town t'other night. And it would be a thousand pities if we did not strike as hard as we can, now that the iron is so hot.
"I want to tell you what I would like, my dear friend, assuming that you agree with me and are willing to put in the effort to obtain such a document. I would like a short letter addressed to me by the main English authors who signed the international copyright petition, expressing their acknowledgment that I have done my part for the cause. I’m sure I deserve it, but that’s not my main reason. It’s because publishing it in the top journals here would definitely be beneficial. Now that the challenge has been issued, let’s keep going. Clay has already sent someone directly from Washington (where I’ll be on the 6th or 7th of next month) to express his strong interest in this matter, his full support for the ‘manly’ approach I’ve taken regarding it, and his wish to get involved if possible. I've ignited such enthusiasm that there was a meeting of the leading individuals on the other side (very respectfully and appropriately conducted regarding me, I must say) held in this town the other night. It would be a huge shame if we didn’t strike while the iron is hot.
"I have come at last, and it is time I did, to my life here, and intentions for the future. I can do nothing that I want to do, go nowhere where I want to go, and see nothing that I want to see. If I turn into the street, I am followed by a multitude. If I stay at home, the house becomes, with callers, like a fair. If I visit a public institution, with only one friend, the directors come down incontinently, waylay me in the yard, and address me in a long speech. I go to a party in the evening, and am so inclosed and hemmed about by people, stand where I will, that I am exhausted for want of air. I dine out, and have to talk about everything, to everybody. I go to church for quiet, and there is a violent rush to the neighborhood of the pew I sit in, and the clergyman preaches at me. I take my seat in a railroad-car, and the very conductor won't leave me alone. I get out at a station, and can't drink a glass of water, without having a hundred people looking down my throat when I open my mouth to swallow. Conceive what all this is! Then by every post, letters on letters arrive, all about nothing, and all demanding an immediate answer. This man is offended because I won't live in his house; and that man is thoroughly disgusted because I won't go out more than four times in one evening. I have no rest or peace, and am in a perpetual worry.
"I’ve finally arrived, and it’s about time I did, to my life here and my plans for the future. I can’t do anything I want, go anywhere I want, or see anything I want. If I step outside, I’m followed by a crowd. If I stay home, the place fills up with visitors like a carnival. If I visit a public place with just one friend, the directors rush over, corner me in the yard, and give me a long speech. I go to a party in the evening and am so surrounded by people, no matter where I stand, that I feel exhausted from lack of air. I eat out and have to talk about everything with everyone. I go to church for some peace, and there’s a chaotic rush around the pew where I sit, and the pastor preaches directly at me. I take a seat on a train, and even the conductor won't leave me alone. I get off at a station, and I can’t drink a glass of water without a hundred people watching me when I open my mouth. Just imagine what all of this is like! Then, with every mail delivery, letters keep coming in, all about nothing, and all needing an immediate response. This guy is upset because I won’t stay at his place; and that guy is totally annoyed because I refuse to go out more than four times in one evening. I have no peace or rest and am in a constant state of worry."
"Under these febrile circumstances, which this climate[325] especially favors, I have come to the resolution that I will not (so far as my will has anything to do with the matter) accept any more public entertainments or public recognitions of any kind, during my stay in the United States; and in pursuance of this determination I have refused invitations from Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, Virginia, Albany, and Providence. Heaven knows whether this will be effectual, but I shall soon see, for on Monday morning, the 28th, we leave for Philadelphia. There I shall only stay three days. Thence we go to Baltimore, and there I shall only stay three days. Thence to Washington, where we may stay perhaps ten days; perhaps not so long. Thence to Virginia, where we may halt for one day; and thence to Charleston, where we may pass a week perhaps, and where we shall very likely remain until your March letters reach us, through David Colden. I had a design of going from Charleston to Columbia in South Carolina, and there engaging a carriage, a baggage-tender and negro boy to guard the same, and a saddle-horse for myself,—with which caravan I intended going 'right away,' as they say here, into the West, through the wilds of Kentucky and Tennessee, across the Alleghany Mountains, and so on until we should strike the lakes and could get to Canada. But it has been represented to me that this is a track only known to traveling merchants; that the roads are bad, the country a tremendous waste, the inns log houses, and the journey one that would play the very devil with Kate. I am staggered, but not deterred. If I find it possible to be done in the time, I mean to do it; being quite satisfied that without some such dash[326] I can never be a free agent, or see anything worth the telling.
"Given these intense circumstances, which this climate[325] particularly encourages, I have decided that I will not (as far as I can control it) accept any more public events or recognitions while I’m in the United States; and in line with this decision, I have turned down invitations from Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, Virginia, Albany, and Providence. God knows if this will actually work, but I’ll find out soon because on Monday morning, the 28th, we’re heading to Philadelphia. I’ll only be there for three days. Then we’ll go to Baltimore, where I’ll also stay three days. After that, we’re off to Washington, where we might stay for about ten days, or maybe not that long. Next, we’ll go to Virginia, where we might stop for just one day; and then to Charleston, where we might spend a week or so, and where we’ll likely hang around until your March letters reach us via David Colden. I had planned to travel from Charleston to Columbia in South Carolina, hire a carriage, a baggage handler, and a young black boy to look after it, along with a saddle horse for myself—with this group, I intended to head ‘right away,’ as people say here, into the West, through the wilderness of Kentucky and Tennessee, across the Alleghany Mountains, and so on until we reach the lakes and could get to Canada. However, it has been pointed out to me that this is a route known only to traveling merchants; that the roads are terrible, the land a vast wasteland, the inns log cabins, and the journey would be quite harsh on Kate. I’m taken aback, but I’m not discouraged. If I can manage it in time, I intend to go for it; fully believing that without some sort of adventure[326] I can never truly be free or see anything worth sharing."
"We mean to return home in a packet-ship,—not a steamer. Her name is the George Washington, and she will sail from here, for Liverpool, on the seventh of June. At that season of the year they are seldom more than three weeks making the voyage; and I never will trust myself upon the wide ocean, if it please Heaven, in a steamer again. When I tell you all that I observed on board that Britannia, I shall astonish you. Meanwhile, consider two of their dangers. First, that if the funnel were blown overboard the vessel must instantly be on fire, from stem to stern; to comprehend which consequence, you have only to understand that the funnel is more than 40 feet high, and that at night you see the solid fire two or three feet above its top. Imagine this swept down by a strong wind, and picture to yourself the amount of flame on deck; and that a strong wind is likely to sweep it down you soon learn, from the precautions taken to keep it up in a storm, when it is the first thing thought of. Secondly, each of these boats consumes between London and Halifax 700 tons of coals; and it is pretty clear, from this enormous difference of weight in a ship of only 1200 tons burden in all, that she must either be too heavy when she comes out of port, or too light when she goes in. The daily difference in her rolling, as she burns the coals out, is something absolutely fearful. Add to all this, that by day and night she is full of fire and people, that she has no boats, and that the struggling of that enormous machinery in a heavy sea seems as though it would rend her into fragments—and you may have a pretty con-sid-erable[327] damned good sort of a feeble notion that it don't fit nohow; and that it a'n't calculated to make you smart, overmuch; and that you don't feel 'special bright; and by no means first-rate; and not at all tonguey (or disposed for conversation); and that however rowdy you may be by natur', it does use you up com-plete, and that's a fact; and makes you quake considerable, and disposed toe damn the ĕnginĕ!—All of which phrases, I beg to add, are pure Americanisms of the first water.
"We plan to return home on a packet ship, not a steamer. Its name is the George Washington, and it will set sail for Liverpool on June seventh. At that time of year, the journey usually takes no more than three weeks, and I’ll never trust myself on the open ocean, if Heaven permits, in a steamer again. When I tell you everything I observed on board that Britannia, you will be shocked. In the meantime, consider two of their dangers. First, if the funnel were to blow overboard, the ship would immediately catch fire from stem to stern; to understand this, you only need to know that the funnel is over 40 feet tall, and at night, you can see the solid fire two or three feet above its top. Imagine that being knocked down by a strong wind, and picture the amount of flames on deck. You quickly learn that a strong wind is likely to blow it down from the precautions taken to keep it stable in a storm, which is the top priority. Secondly, each of these boats burns through 700 tons of coal between London and Halifax; it’s pretty clear, given this huge weight difference in a ship with a total burden of only 1200 tons, that it must either be too heavy when it leaves port or too light when it comes back. The daily variation in how it rolls, as it burns through the coal, is absolutely terrifying. On top of all this, day and night, the ship is full of fire and people, it has no lifeboats, and the struggle of that massive machinery in rough seas seems like it could tear the ship apart—and you can get a pretty good sense that it doesn't fit well, and it’s not designed to make you feel too great, and you don’t feel particularly bright, or first-rate, or talkative at all; and that no matter how rowdy you might be by nature, it completely exhausts you, and that’s a fact; it makes you quite anxious and leads you to curse the engine!—All of these phrases, I should add, are pure Americanisms without a doubt."
"When we reach Baltimore, we are in the regions of slavery. It exists there, in its least shocking and most mitigated form; but there it is. They whisper, here (they dare only whisper, you know, and that below their breaths), that on that place, and all through the South, there is a dull gloomy cloud on which the very word seems written. I shall be able to say, one of these days, that I accepted no public mark of respect in any place where slavery was;—and that's something.
"When we get to Baltimore, we enter a region with slavery. It’s there, in its least shocking and more subdued form; but it’s still present. People whisper about it here (they only dare to whisper, mind you, and just under their breaths), that in this place, and throughout the South, there’s a heavy, gloomy cloud under which the very word seems to be written. One of these days, I’ll be able to say that I didn’t accept any public acknowledgment in any place where slavery existed;—and that’s something."
"The ladies of America are decidedly and unquestionably beautiful. Their complexions are not so good as those of Englishwomen; their beauty does not last so long; and their figures are very inferior. But they are most beautiful. I still reserve my opinion of the national character,—just whispering that I tremble for a radical coming here, unless he is a radical on principle, by reason and reflection, and from the sense of right. I fear that if he were anything else, he would return home a Tory. . . . I say no more on that head for two months from this time, save that I do fear that the heaviest blow ever dealt at liberty will be dealt by this country, in the failure of its example to[328] the earth. The scenes that are passing in Congress now, all tending to the separation of the States, fill one with such a deep disgust that I dislike the very name of Washington (meaning the place, not the man), and am repelled by the mere thought of approaching it."
The women of America are definitely and undeniably beautiful. Their skin isn't as nice as that of English women; their beauty doesn't last as long; and their figures are quite inferior. But they are still very beautiful. I’m holding off my thoughts on the national character—I can only quietly say that I worry about any radicals coming here, unless they’re radicals based on principles, reason, reflection, and a sense of what’s right. I fear that if they aren’t, they would go back home as a Tory. . . . I won’t say more about that for two months, except that I truly worry the biggest blow to liberty could come from this country, if it fails to be an example to[328] the world. The events happening in Congress right now, all leading to the separation of the States, fill me with such deep disgust that I can't stand the very name of Washington (referring to the place, not the man), and I’m turned off by the mere thought of going there.
"Twenty-seventh February. Sunday.
"There begins to be great consternation here, in reference to the Cunard packet which (we suppose) left Liverpool on the fourth. She has not yet arrived. We scarcely know what to do with ourselves in our extreme anxiety to get letters from home. I have really had serious thoughts of going back to Boston, alone, to be nearer news. We have determined to remain here until Tuesday afternoon, if she should not arrive before, and to send Mr. Q. and the luggage on to Philadelphia to-morrow morning. God grant she may not have gone down! but every ship that comes in brings intelligence of a terrible gale (which indeed was felt ashore here) on the night of the fourteenth; and the sea-captains swear (not without some prejudice, of course) that no steamer could have lived through it, supposing her to have been in its full fury. As there is no steam-packet to go to England, supposing the Caledonia not to arrive, we are obliged to send our letters by the Garrick ship, which sails early to-morrow morning. Consequently I must huddle this up, and dispatch it to the post-office with all speed. I have so much to say that I could fill quires of paper, which renders this sudden pull-up the more provoking.
There's a lot of worry here about the Cunard ship that we think left Liverpool on the fourth. It still hasn't shown up. We're not sure what to do with ourselves as we anxiously await letters from home. I've seriously considered going back to Boston alone just to be closer to the news. We've decided to stay here until Tuesday afternoon, unless she arrives before then, and to send Mr. Q. and the luggage on to Philadelphia tomorrow morning. I really hope she hasn't gone down! But every ship that comes in brings news of a terrible storm (which we felt here on shore) on the night of the fourteenth; and sea captains insist (not without some bias, of course) that no steamer could have survived it if she was in the thick of it. Since there’s no steamship to England in case the Caledonia doesn't arrive, we have to send our letters with the Garrick ship, which sets sail early tomorrow morning. So, I need to rush this and get it to the post office quickly. I have so much to say that I could fill pages, which makes this sudden halt even more frustrating.
"I have in my portmanteau a petition for an international copyright law, signed by all the best American[329] writers, with Washington Irving at their head. They have requested me to hand it to Clay for presentation, and to back it with any remarks I may think proper to offer. So 'Hoo-roar for the principle, as the money-lender said ven he vouldn't renoo the bill.'
"I have in my suitcase a petition for an international copyright law, signed by all the top American writers, with Washington Irving leading the charge. They’ve asked me to give it to Clay for presentation and to support it with any comments I feel are appropriate. So 'Hooray for the principle, as the moneylender said when he wouldn’t renew the bill.'”
"God bless you. . . . You know what I would say about home and the darlings. A hundred times God bless you. . . . Fears are entertained for Lord Ashburton also. Nothing has been heard of him."
"God bless you... You know what I would say about home and the kids. A hundred times, God bless you... There are also worries about Lord Ashburton. No one has heard anything from him."
A brief letter, sent me next day by the minister's bag, was in effect a postscript to the foregoing, and expressed still more strongly the doubts and apprehensions his voyage out had impressed him with, and which, though he afterwards saw reason greatly to modify his misgivings, were not so strange at that time as they appear to us now:
A short letter, sent to me the next day by the minister's bag, served as a postscript to the previous message and expressed even more strongly the doubts and concerns he felt about his journey. Though he later found reasons to significantly change his worries, they weren't as unusual back then as they seem to us now:
"Carlton House, New York, February twenty-eighth, 1842. . . . The Caledonia, I grieve and regret to say, has not arrived. If she left England to her time, she has been four-and-twenty days at sea. There is no news of her; and on the nights of the fourteenth and eighteenth it blew a terrible gale, which almost justifies the worst suspicions. For myself, I have hardly any hope of her; having seen enough, in our passage out, to convince me that steaming across the ocean in heavy weather is as yet an experiment of the utmost hazard.
"Carlton House, New York, February 28, 1842... I’m sorry to say the Caledonia hasn't arrived. If she left England on time, she has been at sea for 24 days. There’s no news about her, and during the nights of the 14th and 18th, there was a terrible storm, which raises serious concerns. Personally, I hardly have any hope left for her; I’ve seen enough on our trip over to know that steaming across the ocean in rough weather is still an extremely risky experiment."
"As it was supposed that there would be no steamer whatever for England this month (since in ordinary course the Caledonia would have returned with the mails on the 2d of March), I hastily got the letters ready yesterday and sent them by the Garrick; which[330] may perhaps be three weeks out, but is not very likely to be longer. But belonging to the Cunard company is a boat called the Unicorn, which in the summertime plies up the St. Lawrence, and brings passengers from Canada to join the British and North American steamers at Halifax. In the winter she lies at the last-mentioned place; from which news has come this morning that they have sent her on to Boston for the mails, and, rather than interrupt the communication, mean to dispatch her to England in lieu of the poor Caledonia. This in itself, by the way, is a daring deed; for she was originally built to run between Liverpool and Glasgow, and is no more designed for the Atlantic than a Calais packet-boat; though she once crossed it, in the summer season.
"As it was expected that there wouldn’t be any steamer for England this month (since the Caledonia would typically have returned with the mail on March 2nd), I quickly prepared the letters yesterday and sent them by the Garrick; which[330] may be out for about three weeks, but it's unlikely to be any longer. However, belonging to the Cunard company is a boat called the Unicorn, which operates on the St. Lawrence River in the summer and brings passengers from Canada to connect with the British and North American steamers at Halifax. In the winter, she stays at the aforementioned place; and this morning, news came in that they’ve sent her to Boston for the mail, and rather than disrupt communication, they plan to send her to England instead of the poor Caledonia. This, by the way, is quite a bold move; she was originally built to operate between Liverpool and Glasgow and isn’t suited for the Atlantic any more than a Calais packet boat; although she did cross it once during the summer season."
"You may judge, therefore, what the owners think of the probability of the Caledonia's arrival. How slight an alteration in our plans would have made us passengers on board of her!
"You can tell what the owners think about the chances of the Caledonia arriving. If only we had made a small change in our plans, we could have been on board with her!"
"It would be difficult to tell you, my dear fellow, what an impression this has made upon our minds, or with what intense anxiety and suspense we have been waiting for your letters from home. We were to have gone South to-day, but linger here until to-morrow afternoon (having sent the secretary and luggage forward) for one more chance of news. Love to dear Macready, and to dear Mac, and every one we care for. It's useless to speak of the dear children. It seems now as though we should never hear of them. . . .
"It’s hard to express, my dear friend, the impact this has had on us or how anxiously we've been waiting for your letters from home. We were supposed to head South today, but we’re sticking around until tomorrow afternoon (having sent the secretary and our bags ahead) for one last chance to get some news. Send my love to dear Macready, and to dear Mac, and everyone else we care about. There's no point in talking about the kids. It feels like we may never hear from them again. . . ."
"P.S. Washington Irving is a great fellow. We have laughed most heartily together. He is just the man he ought to be. So is Doctor Channing, with[331] whom I have had an interesting correspondence since I saw him last at Boston. Halleck is a merry little man. Bryant a sad one, and very reserved. Washington Allston the painter (who wrote Monaldi) is a fine specimen of a glorious old genius. Longfellow, whose volume of poems I have got for you, is a frank accomplished man as well as a fine writer, and will be in town 'next fall.' Tell Macready that I suspect prices here must have rather altered since his time. I paid our fortnight's bill here, last night. We have dined out every day (except when I was laid up with a sore throat), and only had in all four bottles of wine. The bill was 70l. English!!!
"P.S. Washington Irving is a great guy. We’ve laughed a lot together. He’s exactly who he should be. So is Doctor Channing, with[331] whom I’ve had an interesting correspondence since I last saw him in Boston. Halleck is a cheerful little man. Bryant is more serious and very reserved. Washington Allston, the painter (who wrote Monaldi), is a great example of an amazing old genius. Longfellow, whose book of poems I have for you, is an open and accomplished man as well as a fantastic writer and will be in town 'next fall.' Tell Macready that I suspect prices here have probably changed quite a bit since his time. I paid our bill for the last two weeks here last night. We’ve dined out every day (except when I was stuck with a sore throat), and we only had a total of four bottles of wine. The bill was 70l. English!!!"
"You will see, by my other letter, how we have been fêted and feasted; and how there is war to the knife about the international copyright; and how I will speak about it, and decline to be put down. . . .
"You'll see from my other letter how we’ve been celebrated and treated to lavish meals; how there’s a fierce struggle over international copyright; and how I will address it and refuse to back down. . . ."
"Oh for news from home! I think of your letters so full of heart and friendship, with perhaps a little scrawl of Charley's or Mamey's, lying at the bottom of the deep sea; and am as full of sorrow as if they had once been living creatures.—Well! they may come, yet."
"Oh, how I long for news from home! I think of your letters, so full of love and friendship, with maybe a little note from Charley or Mamey, sitting at the bottom of the deep sea; and I feel as sad as if they were once living beings.—Well! They might still come."
They did reach him, but not by the Caledonia. His fears as to that vessel were but too well founded. On the very day when she was due in Boston (the 18th of February) it was learned in London that she had undergone misadventure; that, her decks having been swept and her rudder torn away, though happily no lives were lost, she had returned disabled to Cork; and that the[332] Acadia, having received her passengers and mails, was to sail with them from Liverpool next day.
They managed to get to him, but not on the Caledonia. His concerns about that ship were completely justified. On the exact day it was supposed to arrive in Boston (February 18th), it was reported in London that it had faced problems; its decks were flooded and its rudder was damaged, but thankfully no one lost their life, and it returned to Cork in a disabled state. Meanwhile, the [332] Acadia, having taken on its passengers and mail, was set to depart from Liverpool the next day.
Of the main subject of that letter written on the day preceding,—of the quite unpremeditated impulse, out of which sprang his advocacy of claims which he felt to be represented in his person,—of the injustice done by his entertainers to their guest in ascribing such advocacy to selfishness,—and of the graver wrong done by them to their own highest interests, nay, even to their commonest and most vulgar interests, in continuing to reject those claims, I will add nothing now to what all those years ago I labored very hard to lay before many readers. It will be enough if I here print, from the authors' letters I sent out to him by the next following mail, in compliance with his wish, this which follows from a very dear friend of his and mine. I fortunately had it transcribed before I posted it to him; Mr. Carlyle having in some haste written from "Templand, 26 March, 1842," and taken no copy.
Of the main topic of that letter written the day before—of the completely spontaneous urge that led him to support claims he believed represented him—of the unfairness shown by his hosts in attributing that support to selfishness—and of the deeper wrong done to their own best interests, and even to their most basic and common interests, by continuing to dismiss those claims—I won’t add anything now to what I worked hard to present to many readers all those years ago. It will be enough if I print here, from the letters I sent him by the next mail at his request, what follows from a very dear friend of both his and mine. I was lucky to have it transcribed before I sent it to him; Mr. Carlyle had hastily written from "Templand, 26 March, 1842," and didn't keep a copy.
"We learn by the newspapers that you everywhere in America stir up the question of international copyright, and thereby awaken huge dissonance where all else were triumphant unison for you. I am asked my opinion of the matter, and requested to write it down in words.
"We read in the newspapers that you are raising the issue of international copyright all over America, causing a huge disagreement where there should be harmony for you. I've been asked for my opinion on the matter and requested to put it into writing."
"Several years ago, if memory err not, I was one of many English writers who, under the auspices of Miss Martineau, did already sign a petition to congress praying for an international copyright between the two Nations,—which properly are not two Nations, but one; indivisible by parliament, congress, or any kind of human law or diplomacy, being already united by Heaven's[333] Act of Parliament, and the everlasting law of Nature and Fact. To that opinion I still adhere, and am like to continue adhering.
"Several years ago, if I remember correctly, I was one of many English writers who, with the support of Miss Martineau, signed a petition to Congress asking for an international copyright between our two countries—which really are not two countries, but one; indivisible by parliament, congress, or any type of human law or diplomacy, since we are already united by Heaven's[333] Act of Parliament and the enduring law of Nature and Fact. I still believe that, and I will likely continue to believe it."
"In discussion of the matter before any congress or parliament, manifold considerations and argumentations will necessarily arise; which to me are not interesting, nor essential for helping me to a decision. They respect the time and manner in which the thing should be; not at all whether the thing should be or not. In an ancient book, reverenced I should hope on both sides of the Ocean, it was thousands of years ago written down in the most decisive and explicit manner, 'Thou shalt not steal.' That thou belongest to a different 'Nation,' and canst steal without being certainly hanged for it, gives thee no permission to steal! Thou shalt not in anywise steal at all! So it is written down, for Nations and for Men, in the Law-Book of the Maker of this Universe. Nay, poor Jeremy Bentham and others step in here, and will demonstrate that it is actually our true convenience and expediency not to steal; which I for my share, on the great scale and on the small, and in all conceivable scales and shapes, do also firmly believe it to be. For example, if Nations abstained from stealing, what need were there of fighting,—with its butcherings and burnings, decidedly the most expensive thing in this world? How much more two Nations, which, as I said, are but one Nation; knit in a thousand ways by Nature and Practical Intercourse; indivisible brother elements of the same great Saxondom, to which in all honorable ways be long life!
"In discussing the issue in any congress or parliament, many considerations and arguments will inevitably come up; but for me, they're neither interesting nor essential for making a decision. They concern the time and manner of how things should be handled, not whether something should happen at all. In an ancient book, respected on both sides of the ocean, it was written thousands of years ago in the most clear and definitive way, 'Thou shalt not steal.' Just because you belong to a different 'Nation' and can steal without the risk of hanging doesn't give you permission to steal! You shall not steal in any way! It is clearly stated for nations and individuals in the Law-Book of the Creator of this Universe. Moreover, poor Jeremy Bentham and others argue that it is actually in our best interest not to steal; which I firmly believe, whether on a grand scale or a small one, and in every possible situation. For instance, if nations refrained from stealing, what would be the need for fighting—with its violence and destruction, certainly the most costly thing in this world? How much more so for two nations that, as I mentioned, are really just one nation; connected in countless ways by Nature and Practical Interaction; inseparable parts of the same great Saxon culture, to which I wish long life in all honorable ways!"
"When Mr. Robert Roy M'Gregor lived in the district of Menteith on the Highland border two centuries[334] ago, he for his part found it more convenient to supply himself with beef by stealing it alive from the adjacent glens, than by buying it killed in the Stirling butchers' market. It was Mr. Roy's plan of supplying himself with beef in those days, this of stealing it. In many a little 'Congress' in the district of Menteith, there was debating, doubt it not, and much specious argumentation this way and that, before they could ascertain that, really and truly, buying was the best way to get your beef; which, however, in the long run they did with one assent find it indisputably to be: and accordingly they hold by it to this day."
"When Mr. Robert Roy M'Gregor lived in the Menteith area on the Highland border two centuries[334] ago, he found it easier to get beef by stealing it alive from the nearby glens rather than buying it already butchered in the Stirling market. Stealing was Mr. Roy's method of getting beef back then. In many small 'Congress' meetings in Menteith, they debated, no doubt, and had plenty of convincing arguments back and forth before agreeing that, truly, buying was the best way to get your beef; which, in the end, they all agreed was undeniably the case: and so they continue to believe it to this day."
This brave letter was an important service rendered at a critical time, and Dickens was very grateful for it. But, as time went on, he had other and higher causes for gratitude to its writer. Admiration of Carlyle increased in him with his years; and there was no one whom in later life he honored so much, or had a more profound regard for.
This courageous letter was a significant help during a crucial time, and Dickens was very thankful for it. However, as time passed, he found even more important reasons to appreciate its author. His admiration for Carlyle grew as he aged; there was no one he respected more in his later life or held in higher esteem.
CHAPTER XXI.
PHILADELPHIA, WASHINGTON, AND THE SOUTH.
1842.
Dickens's next letter was begun in the "United States Hotel, Philadelphia," and bore date "Sunday, sixth March, 1842." It treated of much dealt with afterwards at greater length in the Notes, but the freshness and vivacity of the first impressions in it have surprised me. I do not, however, print any passage here which has not its own interest independently of anything contained in that book. The rule will be continued,[336] as in the portions of letters already given, of not transcribing anything before printed, or anything having even but a near resemblance to descriptions that appear in the Notes.
Dickens' next letter was started at the "United States Hotel, Philadelphia," dated "Sunday, March 6, 1842." It covered topics that were discussed later in more detail in the Notes, but I was surprised by the freshness and liveliness of the initial impressions shared in it. However, I'm not including any excerpt here that doesn't have its own interest apart from what's found in that book. The same rule will apply,[336] as in the letters already presented, of not repeating anything previously published or anything that closely resembles descriptions in the Notes.
". . . . . . . As this is likely to be the only quiet day I shall have for a long time, I devote it to writing to you. We have heard nothing from you[49] yet, and only have for our consolation the reflection that the Columbia[50] is now on her way out. No news had been heard of the Caledonia yesterday afternoon, when we left New York. We were to have quitted that place last Tuesday, but have been detained there all the week by Kate having so bad a sore throat that she was obliged to keep her bed. We left yesterday afternoon at five o'clock, and arrived here at eleven last night. Let me say, by the way, that this is a very trying climate.
. . . . . . . As this is probably going to be the only quiet day I'll have for a while, I'm using it to write to you. We haven't heard anything from you[49] yet, and all we have for comfort is the thought that the Columbia[50] is now on her way out. We hadn't heard any news about the Caledonia yesterday afternoon when we left New York. We were supposed to leave that place last Tuesday, but we got held up all week because Kate had a really bad sore throat and had to stay in bed. We left yesterday afternoon at five o'clock and got here at eleven last night. By the way, I have to say that this climate is very tough.
"I have often asked Americans in London which were the better railroads,—ours or theirs? They have taken time for reflection, and generally replied on mature consideration that they rather thought we excelled; in respect of the punctuality with which we arrived at our stations, and the smoothness of our traveling. I wish you could see what an American railroad is, in some parts where I now have seen them. I won't say I wish you could feel what it is, because that would be an unchristian and savage aspiration. It is never inclosed, or warded off. You walk down the main street[337] of a large town; and, slap-dash, headlong, pell-mell, down the middle of the street, with pigs burrowing, and boys flying kites and playing marbles, and men smoking, and women talking, and children crawling, close to the very rails, there comes tearing along a mad locomotive with its train of cars, scattering a red-hot shower of sparks (from its wood fire) in all directions; screeching, hissing, yelling, and panting; and nobody one atom more concerned than if it were a hundred miles away. You cross a turnpike-road; and there is no gate, no policeman, no signal—nothing to keep the wayfarer or quiet traveler out of the way, but a wooden arch on which is written, in great letters, 'Look out for the locomotive.' And if any man, woman, or child don't look out, why, it's his or her fault, and there's an end of it.
"I've often asked Americans in London which railroads are better—ours or theirs? They've taken a moment to think about it and usually concluded that we have the edge, especially when it comes to how on-time we are and how smooth our rides are. I wish you could see what an American railroad is like in some areas where I've seen them. I won’t say I wish you could feel it, because that would be unkind and brutal. It’s never fenced off or separated. You walk down the main street of a large town, and suddenly, right down the middle of the street, with pigs rummaging around, boys flying kites, people smoking, women chatting, and kids crawling close to the rails, a crazy locomotive comes barreling through, throwing sparks everywhere from its wood fire; screeching, hissing, yelling, and panting; and no one seems any more concerned than if it were a hundred miles away. You cross a highway, and there’s no gate, no police officer, no signal—nothing to keep travelers or peaceful pedestrians from wandering into the way, except for a wooden arch that says in big letters, 'Watch out for the locomotive.' And if anyone doesn’t watch out, well, that’s their problem, and that’s that."
"The cars are like very shabby omnibuses,—only larger; holding sixty or seventy people. The seats, instead of being placed long ways, are put cross-wise, back to front. Each holds two. There is a long row of these on each side of the caravan, and a narrow passage up the centre. The windows are usually all closed, and there is very often, in addition, a hot, close, most intolerable charcoal stove in a red-hot glow. The heat and closeness are quite insupportable. But this is the characteristic of all American houses, of all the public institutions, chapels, theatres, and prisons. From the constant use of the hard anthracite coal in these beastly furnaces, a perfectly new class of diseases is springing up in the country. Their effect upon an Englishman is briefly told. He is always very sick and[338] very faint; and has an intolerable headache, morning, noon, and night.
"The cars are like really run-down buses—just bigger; they can fit sixty or seventy people. The seats, instead of facing forward, are arranged sideways, back to front. Each seat accommodates two people. There's a long row of these seats on each side of the vehicle, with a narrow aisle down the middle. The windows are usually all shut, and there's often a hot, stuffy, extremely annoying charcoal stove glowing red-hot. The heat and stuffiness are completely unbearable. But this is typical of all American homes, as well as all public places, churches, theaters, and jails. Because of the constant burning of hard anthracite coal in these awful furnaces, a whole new range of diseases is rising up in the country. The effect on an Englishman can be summed up quickly: he always feels very sick and very faint, and he's plagued by a terrible headache, morning, noon, and night.[338]
"In the ladies' car, there is no smoking of tobacco allowed. All gentlemen who have ladies with them sit in this car; and it is usually very full. Before it, is the gentlemen's car; which is something narrower. As I had a window close to me yesterday which commanded this gentlemen's car, I looked at it pretty often, perforce. The flashes of saliva flew so perpetually and incessantly out of the windows all the way, that it looked as though they were ripping open feather-beds inside, and letting the wind dispose of the feathers.[51] But this spitting is universal. In the courts of law, the judge has his spittoon on the bench, the counsel have theirs, the witness has his, the prisoner his, and the crier his. The jury are accommodated at the rate of three men to a spittoon (or spit-box as they call it here); and the spectators in the gallery are provided for, as so many men who in the course of nature expectorate without cessation. There are spit-boxes in every steamboat, bar-room, public dining-room, house of office, and place of general resort, no matter what it be. In the hospitals, the students are requested, by placard, to use the boxes provided for them, and not to spit upon the stairs. I have twice seen gentlemen, at evening parties in New York, turn aside when they were not engaged in conversation, and spit upon the drawing-room carpet. And in every bar-room and hotel passage the stone floor looks as if it were paved[339] with open oysters—from the quantity of this kind of deposit which tessellates it all over. . . .
"In the ladies' car, smoking tobacco isn’t allowed. All gentlemen with ladies sit in this car, which is usually quite crowded. In front of it is the gentlemen's car, which is a bit narrower. Since I had a window right by me yesterday that overlooked this gentlemen's car, I found myself looking at it quite often. The constant spatters of saliva flying out of the windows made it seem like they were emptying feather beds inside and letting the wind scatter the feathers. [51] But this spitting is a common thing. In courtrooms, the judge has his spittoon on the bench, the lawyers have theirs, the witnesses have theirs, the prisoners have theirs, and the crier has his too. The jury is set up for three men per spittoon (or spit-box, as they call it here), and the spectators in the gallery have similar arrangements, being numerous men who naturally spit without pause. There are spit-boxes in every steamboat, bar, public dining room, office, and any place where people gather, regardless of what it is. In hospitals, students are asked, via posters, to use the boxes provided for them and not to spit on the stairs. I've seen gentlemen at evening parties in New York turn aside when not in conversation and spit on the drawing-room carpet. In every bar and hotel hallway, the stone floor looks like it’s paved with open oysters due to the amount of this kind of mess that covers it. . . . [339]
"The institutions at Boston, and at Hartford, are most admirable. It would be very difficult indeed to improve upon them. But this is not so at New York; where there is an ill-managed lunatic asylum, a bad jail, a dismal workhouse, and a perfectly intolerable place of police-imprisonment. A man is found drunk in the streets, and is thrown into a cell below the surface of the earth; profoundly dark; so full of noisome vapors that when you enter it with a candle you see a ring about the light, like that which surrounds the moon in wet and cloudy weather; and so offensive and disgusting in its filthy odors that you cannot bear its stench. He is shut up within an iron door, in a series of vaulted passages where no one stays; has no drop of water, or ray of light, or visitor, or help of any kind; and there he remains until the magistrate's arrival. If he die (as one man did not long ago), he is half eaten by the rats in an hour's time (as this man was). I expressed, on seeing these places the other night, the disgust I felt, and which it would be impossible to repress. 'Well, I don't know,' said the night constable—that's a national answer, by-the-by,—'well, I don't know. I've had six-and-twenty young women locked up here together, and beautiful ones too, and that's a fact.' The cell was certainly no larger than the wine-cellar in Devonshire Terrace; at least three feet lower; and stunk like a common sewer. There was one woman in it then. The magistrate begins his examinations at five o'clock in the morning; the watch is set at seven at night; if the prisoners have been given[340] in charge by an officer, they are not taken out before nine or ten; and in the interval they remain in these places, where they could no more be heard to cry for help, in case of a fit or swoon among them, than a man's voice could be heard after he was coffined up in his grave.
The institutions in Boston and Hartford are really impressive. It would be very hard to make them any better. But that's not the case in New York, where there’s a poorly managed mental asylum, a terrible jail, a dismal workhouse, and an absolutely unbearable police holding facility. If a person is found drunk on the streets, they're thrown into a cell underground; it's pitch black, filled with awful fumes, so that when you enter with a candle, you see a halo around the light like the ring around the moon on a cloudy night; and the terrible odors are so offensive that you can’t handle the stench. They’re locked behind an iron door in a series of vaults where no one stays, with no water, no light, no visitors, or help of any kind; and they stay there until the magistrate arrives. If they die (like one man did not long ago), the rats will have half eaten him within an hour (just like this man). When I saw these places the other night, I expressed the disgust I felt, which was impossible to hide. 'Well, I don't know,' said the night constable—that’s a typical national response, by the way—'well, I don’t know. I’ve had twenty-six young women locked up here together, and beautiful ones too, and that's a fact.' The cell was definitely no bigger than the wine cellar in Devonshire Terrace; at least three feet lower; and it smelled like a common sewer. There was one woman in there at the time. The magistrate starts his hearings at five in the morning; the watch begins at seven at night; if the prisoners have been handed over to an officer, they’re not taken out until nine or ten; and during that time, they remain in those places, where they couldn’t be heard crying for help in case they had a seizure or fainted, any more than a voice could be heard once it is coffined in the grave.
"There is a prison in this same city, and indeed in the same building, where prisoners for grave offenses await their trial, and to which they are sent back when under remand. It sometimes happens that a man or woman will remain here for twelve months, waiting the result of motions for new trial, and in arrest of judgment, and what not. I went into it the other day: without any notice or preparation, otherwise I find it difficult to catch them in their work-a-day aspect. I stood in a long, high, narrow building, consisting of four galleries one above the other, with a bridge across each, on which sat a turnkey, sleeping or reading as the case might be. From the roof, a couple of wind-sails dangled and drooped, limp and useless; the sky-light being fast closed, and they only designed for summer use. In the centre of the building was the eternal stove; and along both sides of every gallery was a long row of iron doors—looking like furnace-doors, being very small, but black and cold as if the fires within had gone out.
There’s a prison in this city, in fact, in the same building, where inmates awaiting trial for serious crimes are held, and to which they are returned when on remand. Sometimes a person can spend up to a year here, waiting for the outcomes of motions for new trials and other legal proceedings. I visited the place the other day: without any prior notice or preparation, otherwise, I find it hard to see them in their everyday state. I stood in a long, high, narrow building made up of four tiers, one above the other, with a bridge across each level where a guard sat, either sleeping or reading. A couple of ventilation shafts dangled from the ceiling, droopy and useless; the skylight was tightly shut, and they were meant only for summer use. In the middle of the building was the constant stove; along both sides of each gallery were long rows of iron doors—looking like furnace doors, very small, but black and cold as if the fires inside had gone out.
"A man with keys appears, to show us round. A good-looking fellow, and, in his way, civil and obliging." (I omit a dialogue of which the substance has been printed,[52] and give only that which appears for the first time here.)
"A man with keys comes in to give us a tour. He’s good-looking and, in his own way, polite and helpful." (I skip a conversation that has already been published,[52] and only include what appears for the first time here.)
"'Suppose a man's here for twelve months. Do you mean to say he never comes out at that little iron door?'
"'So, a guy is here for twelve months. Are you saying he never goes out through that little iron door?'"
"'He may walk some, perhaps—not much.'
"He might walk a bit, maybe—not much."
"'Will you show me a few of them?'
'Will you show me a few of them?'
"'Ah! All, if you like.'
"'Oh! Everyone, if that's cool.'"
"He threw open a door, and I looked in. An old man was sitting on his bed, reading. The light came in through a small chink, very high up in the wall. Across the room ran a thick iron pipe to carry off filth; this was bored for the reception of something like a big funnel in shape; and over the funnel was a watercock. This was his washing apparatus and water-closet. It was not savory, but not very offensive. He looked up at me; gave himself an odd, dogged kind of shake; and fixed his eyes on his book again. I came out, and the door was shut and locked. He had been there a month, and would have to wait another month for his trial. 'Has he ever walked out now, for instance?' 'No.' . . .
"He swung open a door, and I peered inside. An elderly man was sitting on his bed, reading. Light streamed in through a small gap high up in the wall. A thick iron pipe ran across the room to drain waste; it had a funnel-like shape at one end, and above the funnel was a water tap. This served as his washing setup and toilet. It didn't smell great, but it wasn't too offensive. He glanced up at me, gave himself an odd, stubborn shake, and returned his gaze to his book. I stepped back out, and the door was shut and locked. He had been there for a month and would have to wait another month for his trial. 'Has he ever walked out, for example?' 'No.'”
"'In England, if a man is under sentence of death even, he has a yard to walk in at certain times.'
"'In England, even a man on death row has a yard to walk in at specific times.'"
"'Possible?'
"Is that possible?"
" . . . Making me this answer with a coolness which is perfectly untranslatable and inexpressible, and which is quite peculiar to the soil, he took me to the women's side, telling me, upon the way, all about this man, who, it seems, murdered his wife, and will certainly be hanged. The women's doors have a small square aperture in them; I looked through one, and saw a pretty boy about ten or twelve years old, who seemed lonely and miserable enough—as well he might. 'What's he been[342] doing?' says I. 'Nothing,' says my friend. 'Nothing!' says I. 'No,' says he. 'He's here for safe keeping. He saw his father kill his mother, and is detained to give evidence against him—that was his father you saw just now.' 'But that's rather hard treatment for a witness, isn't it?' 'Well, I don't know. It a'n't a very rowdy life, and that's a fact.' So my friend, who was an excellent fellow in his way, and very obliging, and a handsome young man to boot, took me off to show me some more curiosities; and I was very much obliged to him, for the place was so hot, and I so giddy, that I could scarcely stand. . . .
" . . . Giving me this response with a coolness that’s impossible to translate and really unique to this place, he took me to the women’s side, telling me along the way all about this man who apparently murdered his wife and will definitely be hanged. The women’s doors have a small square opening in them; I looked through one and saw a pretty boy around ten or twelve years old who looked lonely and quite miserable—as he probably should. 'What’s he been[342] doing?' I asked. 'Nothing,' my friend replied. 'Nothing!' I said. 'No,' he answered. 'He’s here for his own safety. He witnessed his father kill his mother and is being kept to testify against him—that was his father you saw just now.' 'But that seems like pretty harsh treatment for a witness, doesn’t it?' I said. 'Well, I don’t know. It’s not exactly an exciting life, and that’s a fact.' So my friend, who was genuinely a good guy and very helpful, and a good-looking young man as well, took me to show me some more interesting things; and I was really grateful to him because it was so hot, and I felt so dizzy that I could hardly stand. . . ."
"When a man is hanged in New York, he is walked out of one of these cells, without any condemned sermon or other religious formalities, straight into the narrow jail-yard, which may be about the width of Cranbourn Alley. There, a gibbet is erected, which is of curious construction; for the culprit stands on the earth with the rope about his neck, which passes through a pulley in the top of the 'Tree' (see Newgate Calendar passim), and is attached to a weight something heavier than the man. This weight, being suddenly let go, drags the rope down with it, and sends the criminal flying up fourteen feet into the air; while the judge, and jury, and five-and-twenty citizens (whose presence is required by the law), stand by, that they may afterwards certify to the fact. This yard is a very dismal place; and when I looked at it, I thought the practice infinitely superior to ours: much more solemn, and far less degrading and indecent.
"When a man is hanged in New York, he's taken out of one of these cells, without any final sermon or religious rituals, straight into the narrow jail yard, which is about the width of Cranbourn Alley. There, a gallows is set up, which is rather unique; the person stands on the ground with a rope around his neck, passing through a pulley at the top of the 'Tree' (see Newgate Calendar passim), and is attached to a weight that's a bit heavier than him. When this weight is suddenly released, it pulls the rope down and sends the criminal soaring fourteen feet into the air; meanwhile, the judge, the jury, and twenty-five citizens (who are required by law to be present) stand by to confirm what happened afterward. This yard is a really grim place; and when I looked at it, I thought this method was far superior to ours: much more solemn and significantly less degrading and indecent."

"There is another prison near New York which is a house of correction. The convicts labor in stone-quarries[343] near at hand, but the jail has no covered yards or shops, so that when the weather is wet (as it was when I was there) each man is shut up in his own little cell, all the live-long day. These cells, in all the correction-houses I have seen, are on one uniform plan,—thus: a, b, c, and d, are the walls of the building with windows in them, high up in the wall. The shaded place in the centre represents four tiers of cells, one above the other, with doors of grated iron, and a light grated gallery to each tier. Four tiers front to b, and four to d, so that by this means you may be said, in walking round, to see eight tiers in all. The intermediate blank space you walk in, looking up at these galleries; so that, coming in at the door e, and going either to the right or left till you come back to the door again, you see all the cells under one roof and in one high room. Imagine them in number 400, and in every one a man locked up; this one with his hands through the bars of his grate, this one in bed (in the middle of the day, remember), and this one flung down in a heap upon the ground with his head against the bars like a wild beast. Make the rain pour down in torrents outside. Put the everlasting stove in the midst; hot, suffocating, and vaporous, as a witch's cauldron. Add a smell like that of a thousand old mildewed umbrellas wet through, and a thousand dirty-clothes-bags musty, moist, and fusty, and you will[344] have some idea—a very feeble one, my dear friend, on my word—of this place yesterday week. You know of course that we adopted our improvements in prison-discipline from the American pattern; but I am confident that the writers who have the most lustily lauded the American prisons have never seen Chesterton's domain or Tracey's.[53] There is no more comparison between these two prisons of ours, and any I have seen here yet, than there is between the keepers here, and those two gentlemen. Putting out of sight the difficulty we have in England of finding useful labor for the prisoners (which of course arises from our being an older country and having vast numbers of artisans unemployed), our system is more complete, more impressive, and more satisfactory in every respect. It is very possible that I have not come to the best, not having yet seen Mount Auburn. I will tell you when I have. And also when I have come to those inns, mentioned—vaguely rather—by Miss Martineau, where they undercharge literary people for the love the landlords bear them. My experience, so far, has been of establishments where (perhaps for the same reason) they very monstrously and violently overcharge a man whose position forbids remonstrance.
There's another prison near New York that's a correctional facility. The inmates work in nearby stone quarries[343], but the jail has no sheltered yards or workshops, so when it rains (like it did when I was there), each person is confined to their small cell all day long. These cells, in all the correctional facilities I’ve seen, follow a standard layout—like this: a, b, c, and d are the walls of the building with high windows. The shaded area in the center illustrates four tiers of cells stacked one on top of the other, with grated iron doors and a light grated walkway for each tier. There are four tiers facing b and four facing d, so as you walk around, you could say you see eight tiers total. The empty space you walk in lets you look up at the galleries, so entering through door e and walking either left or right until you return to the door, you see all the cells under one roof in one tall room. Picture there being 400 of them, each with a man locked up; one guy has his hands stretched through the bars of his grate, another is in bed (remember, it's the middle of the day), and another is slumped against the bars like a wild animal. Imagine the rain pouring down outside. Place the constant stove in the center, hot, stifling, and steamy like a witch's cauldron. Add a smell like a thousand old, moldy umbrellas soaked through, and a thousand dirty, musty laundry bags, and you’ll have some idea—a rather weak one, my dear friend, I assure you—of what this place was like last week. You know, of course, that we took our improvements in jail discipline from the American model; but I’m sure the writers who have praised American prisons the most have never seen Chesterton's facility or Tracey's.[53] There’s no comparison between our two prisons and any I've seen here yet, just like there’s no comparison between the guards here and those two individuals. Setting aside the challenge we have in England of finding meaningful work for prisoners (which, of course, comes from being an older country with many unemployed artisans), our system is more comprehensive, more impactful, and more satisfying in every way. It’s very possible that I haven’t found the best yet, as I haven't seen Mount Auburn. I’ll let you know when I do. And also when I finally get to those inns, which Miss Martineau vaguely mentioned, where they undercharge writers because the landlords appreciate them. So far, my experience has been at places where (perhaps for the same reason) they overly and shamelessly charge someone in a position that doesn’t allow for complaints.
"Washington State, Sunday, March the Thirteenth, 1842.
"In allusion to the last sentence, my dear friend, I must tell you a slight experience I had in Philadelphia. My rooms had been ordered for a week, but, in consequence of Kate's illness, only Mr. Q. and the luggage had gone on. Mr. Q. always lives at the table-d'hôte,[345] so that while we were in New York our rooms were empty. The landlord not only charged me half the full rent for the time during which the rooms were reserved for us (which was quite right), but charged me also for board for myself and Kate and Anne, at the rate of nine dollars per day for the same period, when we were actually living, at the same expense, in New York!!! I did remonstrate upon this head, but was coolly told it was the custom (which I have since been assured is a lie), and had nothing for it but to pay the amount. What else could I do? I was going away by the steamboat at five o'clock in the morning; and the landlord knew perfectly well that my disputing an item of his bill would draw down upon me the sacred wrath of the newspapers, which would one and all demand in capitals if this was the gratitude of the man whom America had received as she had never received any other man but La Fayette?
"Referring to the last sentence, my dear friend, I have to share a small experience I had in Philadelphia. I had booked my rooms for a week, but because Kate was sick, only Mr. Q. and the luggage went ahead. Mr. Q. always stays at the dining table, so our rooms were empty while we were in New York. The landlord charged me half the full rent for the time the rooms were reserved for us (which was fair), but he also charged me for board for myself, Kate, and Anne, at nine dollars per day for that same period, even though we were actually living in New York at the same cost!!! I did protest about this, but was casually told it was the custom (which I have since learned is false), and I had no choice but to pay the bill. What else could I do? I was leaving by steamboat at five o'clock in the morning; and the landlord knew that disputing a charge would bring down the ire of the newspapers, which would all demand in big letters if this was the gratitude of the man whom America had welcomed like no other, except La Fayette?"
"I went last Tuesday to the Eastern Penitentiary near Philadelphia, which is the only prison in the States, or I believe in the world, on the principle of hopeless, strict, and unrelaxed solitary confinement, during the whole term of the sentence. It is wonderfully kept, but a most dreadful, fearful place. The inspectors, immediately on my arrival in Philadelphia, invited me to pass the day in the jail, and to dine with them when I had finished my inspection, that they might hear my opinion of the system. Accordingly I passed the whole day in going from cell to cell, and conversing with the prisoners. Every facility was given me, and no constraint whatever imposed upon any man's free speech. If I were to write you a letter of twenty sheets, I could[346] not tell you this one day's work; so I will reserve it until that happy time when we shall sit round the table a Jack Straw's—you, and I, and Mac—and go over my diary. I never shall be able to dismiss from my mind the impressions of that day. Making notes of them, as I have done, is an absurdity, for they are written, beyond all power of erasure, in my brain. I saw men who had been there, five years, six years, eleven years, two years, two months, two days; some whose term was nearly over, and some whose term had only just begun. Women too, under the same variety of circumstances. Every prisoner who comes into the jail comes at night; is put into a bath, and dressed in the prison-garb; and then a black hood is drawn over his face and head, and he is led to the cell from which he never stirs again until his whole period of confinement has expired. I looked at some of them with the same awe as I should have looked at men who had been buried alive and dug up again.
I went last Tuesday to the Eastern Penitentiary near Philadelphia, which is the only prison in the U.S., or I think in the world, based on the principle of hopeless, strict, and unyielding solitary confinement for the entire duration of the sentence. It is impressively maintained, but a truly dreadful and frightening place. The inspectors, as soon as I arrived in Philadelphia, invited me to spend the day in the prison and to have dinner with them afterward so they could hear my thoughts on the system. So, I spent the whole day going from cell to cell and talking with the prisoners. They provided me with every opportunity, and there were no restrictions on anyone's ability to speak freely. If I were to write you a twenty-page letter, I still couldn't describe this one day's experience; so I'll save it until that wonderful time when we can all sit around the table at Jack Straw's—you, me, and Mac—and go through my diary. I’ll never be able to shake the impressions of that day. Taking notes, as I have, seems pointless because they are etched in my mind beyond the possibility of erasure. I met men who had been there for five years, six years, eleven years, two years, two months, and two days; some whose sentences were almost finished, and others just starting. There were women as well, under varying circumstances. Every prisoner who enters the jail comes at night; they're put in a bath and dressed in prison clothes, then a black hood is pulled over their face and head, and they're led to a cell from which they won’t leave until their entire sentence is served. I looked at some of them with the same awe I'd have felt if I were looking at men who had been buried alive and exhumed again.
"We dined in the jail: and I told them after dinner how much the sight had affected me, and what an awful punishment it was. I dwelt upon this; for, although the inspectors are extremely kind and benevolent men, I question whether they are sufficiently acquainted with the human mind to know what it is they are doing. Indeed, I am sure they do not know. I bore testimony, as every one who sees it must, to the admirable government of the institution (Stanfield is the keeper: grown a little younger, that's all); but added that nothing could justify such a punishment but its working a reformation in the prisoners. That for short terms—say two years for the maximum—I conceived, especially[347] after what they had told me of its good effects in certain cases, it might perhaps be highly beneficial; but that, carried to so great an extent, I thought it cruel and unjustifiable; and, further, that their sentences for small offenses were very rigorous, not to say savage. All this they took like men who were really anxious to have one's free opinion and to do right. And we were very much pleased with each other, and parted in the friendliest way.
"We had dinner in the jail, and after the meal, I shared how much the experience impacted me and how severe the punishment felt. I emphasized this point because, although the inspectors are genuinely kind and caring, I doubt they fully understand the human mind and the consequences of their actions. In fact, I'm certain they don't. I acknowledged, as anyone who sees it would, the excellent management of the institution (Stanfield is the keeper, looking a bit younger, that's all); however, I added that nothing could justify such a punishment unless it led to the reform of the inmates. For shorter sentences—say two years at most—I thought, especially after hearing about its positive effects in certain cases, it could potentially be very beneficial. However, I believed that extending it to such a degree was cruel and unjustifiable, and furthermore, that their penalties for minor offenses were excessively harsh, if not brutal. They received all this like people who genuinely wanted to hear honest feedback and do the right thing. We were quite pleased with each other and parted on friendly terms."
"They sent me back to Philadelphia in a carriage they had sent for me in the morning; and then I had to dress in a hurry, and follow Kate to Carey's the bookseller's, where there was a party. He married a sister of Leslie's. There are three Miss Leslies here, very accomplished; and one of them has copied all her brother's principal pictures. These copies hang about the room. We got away from this as soon as we could; and next morning had to turn out at five. In the morning I had received and shaken hands with five hundred people, so you may suppose that I was pretty well tired. Indeed, I am obliged to be very careful of myself; to avoid smoking and drinking; to get to bed soon; and to be particular in respect of what I eat. . . . You cannot think how bilious and trying the climate is. One day it is hot summer, without a breath of air; the next, twenty degrees below freezing, with a wind blowing that cuts your skin like steel. These changes have occurred here several times since last Wednesday night.
They sent me back to Philadelphia in a carriage they arranged for me in the morning; then I had to quickly get dressed and follow Kate to Carey's, the bookseller's, where there was a party. He married one of Leslie's sisters. There are three Miss Leslies here, all very talented; and one of them has copied all her brother's main paintings. These copies are hung around the room. We left as soon as we could; and the next morning, we had to get up at five. That morning, I had met and shaken hands with five hundred people, so you can imagine I was pretty exhausted. In fact, I have to be very careful about my health; avoiding smoking and drinking, going to bed early, and being particular about what I eat. You wouldn’t believe how rough the climate is. One day it feels like hot summer with not a hint of breeze; the next, it's twenty degrees below freezing, with a wind that cuts through you like steel. These swings in weather have happened several times since last Wednesday night.
"I have altered my route, and don't mean to go to Charleston. The country, all the way from here, is nothing but a dismal swamp; there is a bad night of[348] sea-coasting in the journey; the equinoctial gales are blowing hard; and Clay (a most charming fellow, by-the-by), whom I have consulted, strongly dissuades me. The weather is intensely hot there; the spring fever is coming on; and there is very little to see, after all. We therefore go next Wednesday night to Richmond, which we shall reach on Thursday. There we shall stop three days; my object being to see some tobacco-plantations. Then we shall go by James River back to Baltimore, which we have already passed through, and where we shall stay two days. Then we shall go West at once, straight through the most gigantic part of this continent: across the Alleghany Mountains, and over a prairie.
"I've changed my plans and I'm not going to Charleston. The countryside all the way there is just a miserable swamp; the journey involves a tough night of sea-coasting; the spring storms are hitting hard; and Clay (a really charming guy, by the way) that I consulted, strongly advises against it. The weather there is extremely hot; spring fever is starting to kick in; and there isn’t much to see, anyway. So, we’ll head to Richmond next Wednesday night, arriving there on Thursday. We’ll stay for three days because I want to check out some tobacco plantations. After that, we'll go back to Baltimore via the James River, a place we've already been to, and we'll spend two days there. Then we’ll head west right away, straight through the most massive part of this continent: across the Alleghany Mountains and over a prairie."
"Still at Washington, Fifteenth March, 1842. . . . It is impossible, my dear friend, to tell you what we felt when Mr. Q. (who is a fearfully sentimental genius, but heartily interested in all that concerns us) came to where we were dining last Sunday, and sent in a note to the effect that the Caledonia[54] had arrived! Being really assured of her safety, we felt as if the distance between us and home were diminished by at least one-half. There was great joy everywhere here, for she had been quite despaired of, but our joy was beyond all telling. This news came on by express. Last night your letters reached us. I was dining with a club (for I can't avoid a dinner of that sort, now and then), and Kate sent me a note about nine o'clock to say they were here. But she didn't open them—which I consider heroic—until I came[349] home. That was about half-past ten; and we read them until nearly two in the morning.
"Still in Washington, March 15, 1842. . . . It's impossible, my dear friend, to express how we felt when Mr. Q. (who is incredibly sentimental but genuinely cares about everything that affects us) showed up where we were having dinner last Sunday and sent in a note saying that the Caledonia[54] had arrived! Once we were sure she was safe, it felt like the distance between us and home had shrunk by at least half. There was a lot of joy all around here because she had been completely despaired of, but our happiness was beyond words. This news came by express. Last night, your letters finally reached us. I was out dining with a club (since I can't avoid those kinds of dinners every now and then), and Kate sent me a note around nine o'clock to say they had arrived. But she didn't open them—which I find brave—until I got[349] home. That was around half-past ten, and we read them until nearly two in the morning."
"I won't say a word about your letters; except that Kate and I have come to a conclusion which makes me tremble in my shoes, for we decide that humorous narrative is your forte, and not statesmen of the commonwealth. I won't say a word about your news; for how could I in that case, while you want to hear what we are doing, resist the temptation of expending pages on those darling children? . . .
"I won't say anything about your letters, except that Kate and I have come to a conclusion that makes me nervous because we believe that humorous storytelling is your strength, not political leadership. I won't comment on your news; how could I resist the urge to spend pages talking about those adorable kids while you want to know what we're up to?..."
"I have the privilege of appearing on the floor of both Houses here, and go to them every day. They are very handsome and commodious. There is a great deal of bad speaking, but there are a great many very remarkable men, in the legislature: such as John Quincy Adams, Clay, Preston, Calhoun, and others: with whom I need scarcely add I have been placed in the friendliest relations. Adams is a fine old fellow—seventy-six years old, but with most surprising vigor, memory, readiness, and pluck. Clay is perfectly enchanting; an irresistible man. There are some very notable specimens, too, out of the West. Splendid men to look at, hard to deceive, prompt to act, lions in energy, Crichtons in varied accomplishments, Indians in quickness of eye and gesture, Americans in affectionate and generous impulse. It would be difficult to exaggerate the nobility of some of these glorious fellows.
"I have the privilege of being present in both Houses here and go to them every day. They are really impressive and spacious. There’s quite a bit of bad speaking, but there are also many remarkable people in the legislature: like John Quincy Adams, Clay, Preston, Calhoun, and others: with whom I’ve developed a strong friendship. Adams is a great old guy—seventy-six years old, but with astonishing energy, memory, quick thinking, and courage. Clay is absolutely charming; an irresistible person. There are also some very impressive figures from the West. They’re fantastic to look at, hard to fool, quick to act, full of energy, talented in many ways, quick on their feet, and Americans in their kind and generous spirit. It would be hard to overstate the greatness of some of these amazing people."
"When Clay retires, as he does this month, Preston will become the leader of the Whig party. He so solemnly assures me that the international copyright shall and will be passed, that I almost begin to hope;[350] and I shall be entitled to say, if it be, that I have brought it about. You have no idea how universal the discussion of its merits and demerits has become, or how eager for the change I have made a portion of the people.
"When Clay retires this month, Preston will take over as the leader of the Whig party. He firmly assures me that the international copyright will definitely be approved, and I’m starting to feel a glimmer of hope;[350] and I can claim credit for making it happen if it does. You have no idea how much people are talking about its pros and cons, or how many are excited about the change I’ve helped create."
"You remember what —— was, in England. If you could but see him here! If you could only have seen him when he called on us the other day,—feigning abstraction in the dreadful pressure of affairs of state; rubbing his forehead as one who was aweary of the world; and exhibiting a sublime caricature of Lord Burleigh. He is the only thoroughly unreal man I have seen on this side the ocean. Heaven help the President! All parties are against him, and he appears truly wretched. We go to a levee at his house to-night. He has invited me to dinner on Friday, but I am obliged to decline; for we leave, per steamboat, to-morrow night.
You remember what —— was like in England. If you could see him here! If only you had seen him when he visited us the other day—pretending to be lost in thought under the heavy burden of state affairs; rubbing his forehead like someone tired of the world; and putting on a ridiculous impression of Lord Burleigh. He’s the only entirely fake person I’ve encountered on this side of the ocean. God help the President! Everyone is against him, and he looks genuinely miserable. We’re going to a reception at his house tonight. He invited me to dinner on Friday, but I have to turn it down because we’re leaving by steamboat tomorrow night.
"I said I wouldn't write anything more concerning the American people, for two months. Second thoughts are best. I shall not change, and may as well speak out—to you. They are friendly, earnest, hospitable, kind, frank, very often accomplished, far less prejudiced than you would suppose, warm-hearted, fervent, and enthusiastic. They are chivalrous in their universal politeness to women, courteous, obliging, disinterested; and, when they conceive a perfect affection for a man (as I may venture to say of myself), entirely devoted to him. I have received thousands of people of all ranks and grades, and have never once been asked an offensive or unpolite question,—except by Englishmen, who, when they have been 'located' here[351] for some years, are worse than the devil in his blackest painting. The State is a parent to its people; has a parental care and watch over all poor children, women laboring of child, sick persons, and captives. The common men render you assistance in the streets, and would revolt from the offer of a piece of money. The desire to oblige is universal; and I have never once traveled in a public conveyance without making some generous acquaintance whom I have been sorry to part from, and who has in many cases come on miles, to see us again. But I don't like the country. I would not live here, on any consideration. It goes against the grain with me. It would with you. I think it impossible, utterly impossible, for any Englishman to live here and be happy. I have a confidence that I must be right, because I have everything, God knows, to lead me to the opposite conclusion; and yet I cannot resist coming to this one. As to the causes, they are too many to enter upon here. . . .
"I said I wouldn't write anything more about the American people for two months. It's better to reconsider. I won't change my mind, so I might as well share my thoughts—with you. They are friendly, sincere, welcoming, kind, straightforward, often well-educated, much less prejudiced than you might think, warm-hearted, passionate, and enthusiastic. They are chivalrous in their universal politeness toward women, courteous, helpful, selfless; and when they develop a deep affection for someone (as I might say is the case with me), they are completely devoted to that person. I have welcomed thousands of people from all walks of life, and I've never been asked an offensive or rude question—except by Englishmen who, after being 'settled' here[351] for a few years, can be worse than the devil at his most wicked. The State cares for its people; it takes a parental approach to all disadvantaged children, expectant mothers, sick individuals, and prisoners. Ordinary people will help you in the streets and would refuse any offer of money in return. The desire to help is widespread; and I have never traveled in public transport without making some wonderful connection that I regretted leaving, and who in many cases came miles just to see us again. But I don't like the country. I wouldn't live here for any reason. It simply doesn't sit well with me. It wouldn't with you either. I believe it's impossible, completely impossible, for any Englishman to live here and be happy. I have faith that I must be right, because I have every reason, God knows, to come to the opposite conclusion; yet I cannot help but arrive at this one. As for the reasons, there are too many to discuss here. . . ."
"One of two petitions for an international copyright which I brought here from American authors, with Irving at their head, has been presented to the House of Representatives. Clay retains the other for presentation to the Senate after I have left Washington. The presented one has been referred to a committee; the Speaker has nominated as its chairman Mr. Kennedy, member for Baltimore, who is himself an author and notoriously favorable to such a law; and I am going to assist him in his report.
"One of two petitions for an international copyright that I brought from American authors, led by Irving, has been submitted to the House of Representatives. Clay is keeping the other one to present to the Senate after I've left Washington. The submitted petition has been assigned to a committee; the Speaker has appointed Mr. Kennedy, the representative for Baltimore and a well-known author who is strongly in favor of such a law, as its chairman. I'm going to help him with his report."
"Richmond, Virginia. Thursday Night, March 17.
"Irving was with me at Washington yesterday, and[352] wept heartily at parting. He is a fine fellow, when you know him well; and you would relish him, my dear friend, of all things. We have laughed together at some absurdities we have encountered in company, quite in my vociferous Devonshire-Terrace style. The 'Merrikin' government has treated him, he says, most liberally and handsomely in every respect. He thinks of sailing for Liverpool on the 7th of April, passing a short time in London, and then going to Paris. Perhaps you may meet him. If you do, he will know that you are my dearest friend, and will open his whole heart to you at once. His secretary of legation, Mr. Coggleswell, is a man of very remarkable information, a great traveler, a good talker, and a scholar.
"Irving was with me in Washington yesterday, and[352] cried a lot when we parted. He’s a great guy once you get to know him, and you would really enjoy him, my dear friend, more than anything. We’ve laughed together about some of the absurd things we've come across in company, just like I do in my loud Devonshire-Terrace way. The 'Merrikin' government has treated him, he says, very generously and graciously in every way. He’s thinking of sailing to Liverpool on April 7th, spending a little time in London, and then heading to Paris. You might run into him. If you do, he’ll know you’re my closest friend and will open up to you immediately. His secretary of legation, Mr. Coggleswell, is a really knowledgeable guy, a great traveler, a good conversationalist, and a scholar."
"I am going to sketch you our trip here from Washington, as it involves nine miles of a 'Virginny Road.' That done, I must be brief, good brother." . . .
"I’m going to outline our trip here from Washington, since it covers nine miles of a 'Virginia Road.' Once that’s done, I’ll keep it short, my good brother." . . .
The reader of the American Notes will remember the admirable and most humorous description of the night steamer on the Potomac, and of the black driver over the Virginia road. Both were in this letter; which, after three days, he resumed "At Washington again, Monday, March the twenty-first:
The reader of the American Notes will recall the great and very funny description of the night steamer on the Potomac, and of the black driver on the Virginia road. Both were in this letter; which, after three days, he resumed "At Washington again, Monday, March the twenty-first:
"We had intended to go to Baltimore from Richmond, by a place called Norfolk; but, one of the boats being under repair, I found we should probably be detained at this Norfolk two days. Therefore we came back here yesterday, by the road we had traveled before; lay here last night; and go on to Baltimore this afternoon, at four o'clock. It is a journey of only two hours and a half. Richmond is a prettily situated town, but, like other towns in slave districts (as the[353] planters themselves admit), has an aspect of decay and gloom which to an unaccustomed eye is most distressing. In the black car (for they don't let them sit with the whites), on the railroad as we went there, were a mother and family, whom the steamer was conveying away, to sell; retaining the man (the husband and father, I mean) on his plantation. The children cried the whole way. Yesterday, on board the boat, a slave-owner and two constables were our fellow-passengers. They were coming here in search of two negroes who had run away on the previous day. On the bridge at Richmond there is a notice against fast driving over it, as it is rotten and crazy: penalty—for whites, five dollars; for slaves, fifteen stripes. My heart is lightened as if a great load had been taken from it, when I think that we are turning our backs on this accursed and detested system. I really don't think I could have borne it any longer. It is all very well to say 'be silent on the subject.' They won't let you be silent. They will ask you what you think of it; and will expatiate on slavery as if it were one of the greatest blessings of mankind. 'It's not,' said a hard, bad-looking fellow to me the other day, 'it's not the interest of a man to use his slaves ill. It's damned nonsense that you hear in England.'—I told him quietly that it was not a man's interest to get drunk, or to steal, or to game, or to indulge in any other vice, but he did indulge in it for all that; that cruelty, and the abuse of irresponsible power, were two of the bad passions of human nature, with the gratification of which, considerations of interest or of ruin, had nothing whatever to do; and that, while every candid man must admit[354] that even a slave might be happy enough with a good master, all human beings knew that bad masters, cruel masters, and masters who disgraced the form they bore, were matters of experience and history, whose existence was as undisputed as that of slaves themselves. He was a little taken aback by this, and asked me if I believed in the Bible. Yes, I said, but if any man could prove to me that it sanctioned slavery, I would place no further credence in it. 'Well then,' he said, 'by God, sir, the niggers must be kept down, and the whites have put down the colored people wherever they have found them.' 'That's the whole question,' said I. 'Yes, and by God,' says he, 'the British had better not stand out on that point when Lord Ashburton comes over, for I never felt so warlike as I do now,—and that's a fact.' I was obliged to accept a public supper in this Richmond, and I saw plainly enough there that the hatred which these Southern States bear to us as a nation has been fanned up and revived again by this Creole business, and can scarcely be exaggerated.
"We planned to travel from Richmond to Baltimore via a place called Norfolk, but since one of the boats was being repaired, I realized we would probably be stuck in Norfolk for two days. So, we came back here yesterday using the same road we had taken before, stayed overnight, and will head to Baltimore this afternoon at four o'clock. It’s just a two-and-a-half-hour journey. Richmond is a nicely located town, but like other towns in slave regions (as the planters themselves admit), it has a decayed and gloomy appearance that is quite distressing to someone not used to it. On the black car (as the slaves aren’t allowed to sit with the whites) on the train there, there was a mother and her kids being taken away to be sold, while the husband and father remained on his plantation. The children cried the entire trip. Yesterday, on the boat, we shared our ride with a slave owner and two constables who were looking for two black people that had escaped the day before. There’s a sign on the bridge at Richmond warning against speeding over it because it’s old and unstable: the penalty is five dollars for whites and fifteen lashes for slaves. I feel a weight lifted off my heart just thinking about leaving behind this cursed and hated system. Honestly, I don’t think I could have endured it any longer. People often say, 'just don’t talk about it.' But they won’t let you stay silent. They will ask your opinion, and they will go on about slavery as if it’s one of the greatest benefits to mankind. 'It’s not,' a rough-looking guy told me the other day, 'it’s not in a man's best interest to mistreat his slaves. That’s just nonsense you hear in England.' I quietly replied that it’s also not in a man’s interest to get drunk, steal, gamble, or indulge in any other vices, yet they do it anyway; that cruelty and the abuse of unchecked power are part of human nature, and those issues have nothing to do with self-interest or ruin. While every honest person has to admit that a slave might be reasonably happy with a good master, everyone knows that cruel masters exist, and those who disgrace their position are as real as the existence of slaves themselves. He was a bit shocked by this and asked if I believed in the Bible. Yes, I said, but if anyone could prove to me that it endorses slavery, I wouldn’t believe it anymore. 'Well then,' he said, 'by God, sir, the blacks must be kept down, and the whites have suppressed the colored people wherever they’ve found them.' 'That’s the main issue,' I said. 'Yes, and by God,' he replied, 'the British better not resist when Lord Ashburton comes over, because I’ve never felt so ready for a fight as I do now—and that’s the truth.' I had to accept an invitation for a public dinner in Richmond, and I clearly saw that the hatred these Southern states hold against us as a nation has been reignited by this Creole situation and can hardly be overstated."
. . . . "We were desperately tired at Richmond, as we went to a great many places and received a very great number of visitors. We appoint usually two hours in every day for this latter purpose, and have our room so full at that period that it is difficult to move or breathe. Before we left Richmond, a gentleman told me, when I really was so exhausted that I could hardly stand, that 'three people of great fashion' were much offended by having been told, when they called last evening, that I was tired and not visible, then, but would be 'at home' from twelve to two next day! Another gentleman (no doubt of great fashion also)[355] sent a letter to me two hours after I had gone to bed, preparatory to rising at four next morning, with instructions to the slave who brought it to knock me up and wait for an answer!
. . . . "We were incredibly tired in Richmond, since we visited a lot of places and had a huge number of visitors. We usually set aside two hours each day for this, and our room gets so packed during that time that it’s hard to move or breathe. Before we left Richmond, a gentleman told me, when I was so worn out I could barely stand, that 'three high-profile people' were quite upset because when they came by the previous evening, they were told I was tired and unavailable, but that I would be 'at home' from twelve to two the next day! Another gentleman (likely another high-profile person as well) [355] sent me a letter two hours after I went to bed, preparing for me to wake up at four the next morning, with instructions for the servant who delivered it to wake me up and wait for a reply!"
"I am going to break my resolution of accepting no more public entertainments, in favor of the originators of the printed document overleaf. They live upon the confines of the Indian territory, some two thousand miles or more west of New York! Think of my dining there! And yet, please God, the festival will come off—I should say about the 12th or 15th of next month." . . .
"I’m going to break my resolution of not accepting any more public events, in support of the creators of the printed document on the other side. They live on the edge of Indian territory, about two thousand miles or more west of New York! Just imagine me dining there! And yet, if all goes well, the festival should happen—I’d say around the 12th or 15th of next month."
The printed document was a series of resolutions, moved at a public meeting attended by all the principal citizens, judges, professors, and doctors of St. Louis, urgently inviting to that city of the Far West the distinguished writer then the guest of America, eulogizing his genius, and tendering to him their warmest hospitalities. He was at Baltimore when he closed his letter.
The printed document was a series of resolutions, proposed at a public meeting attended by all the key citizens, judges, professors, and doctors of St. Louis, urgently inviting the distinguished writer, who was then visiting America, to their city in the Far West, praising his talent, and offering him their warmest hospitality. He was in Baltimore when he finished his letter.
"Baltimore, Tuesday, March 22d.
"I have a great diffidence in running counter to any impression formed by a man of Maclise's genius, on a subject he has fully considered." (Referring, apparently, to some remark by myself on the picture of the Play-scene in Hamlet, exhibited this year.) "But I quite agree with you about the King in Hamlet. Talking of Hamlet, I constantly carry in my great-coat pocket the Shakspeare you bought for me in Liverpool. What an unspeakable source of delight that book is to me![356]
"I feel really hesitant to disagree with any opinion formed by someone as talented as Maclise, especially on a topic he has thoroughly thought about." (Apparently referring to something I said about the painting of the Play-scene in Hamlet, displayed this year.) "But I totally agree with you about the King in Hamlet. Speaking of Hamlet, I always carry the Shakspeare you got for me in Liverpool in my coat pocket. That book brings me so much joy![356]
"Your Ontario letter I found here to-night: sent on by the vigilant and faithful Colden, who makes every thing having reference to us or our affairs a labor of the heartiest love. We devoured its contents, greedily. Good Heaven, my dear fellow, how I miss you! and how I count the time 'twixt this and coming home again! Shall I ever forget the day of our parting at Liverpool! when even —— became jolly and radiant in his sympathy with our separation! Never, never shall I forget that time. Ah! how seriously I thought then, and how seriously I have thought many, many times since, of the terrible folly of ever quarreling with a true friend, on good-for-nothing trifles! Every little hasty word that has ever passed between us rose up before me like a reproachful ghost. At this great distance, I seem to look back upon any miserable small interruption of our affectionate intercourse, though only for the instant it has never outlived, with a sort of pity for myself as if I were another creature.
I found your Ontario letter here tonight, sent by the diligent and loyal Colden, who puts his heart into everything related to us or our affairs. We eagerly absorbed its contents. Good heavens, my dear friend, how I miss you! I’m counting the days until I can come home again! Will I ever forget the day we parted in Liverpool, when even —— became cheerful and bright in his sympathy for our separation? I will never forget that moment. Ah! How seriously I thought back then, and how seriously I’ve thought many times since, about the ridiculousness of quarreling with a true friend over meaningless trivialities! Every little hasty word we’ve exchanged feels like a haunting reminder. At this great distance, I look back on the tiniest interruptions in our affectionate relationship, even if they were short-lived, with a sort of pity for myself as if I were a different person.
"I have bought another accordion. The steward lent me one, on the passage out, and I regaled the ladies' cabin with my performances. You can't think with what feeling I play Home Sweet Home every night, or how pleasantly sad it makes us. . . . And so God bless you. . . . I leave space for a short postscript before sealing this, but it will probably contain nothing. The dear, dear children! what a happiness it is to know that they are in such hands!
"I've bought another accordion. The steward lent me one on the way out, and I entertained the ladies' cabin with my playing. You can't imagine how I feel when I play Home Sweet Home every night, or how pleasantly sad it makes us. . . . So God bless you. . . . I've left room for a short postscript before sealing this, but it will probably be empty. The dear, dear children! What a joy it is to know they are in such good hands!"
"P.S. Twenty-third March, 1842. Nothing new. And all well. I have not heard that the Columbia is in, but she is hourly expected. Washington Irving has[357] come on for another leave-taking,[55] and dines with me to-day. We start for the West, at half-after eight to-morrow morning. I send you a newspaper, the most respectable in the States, with a very just copyright article."
CHAPTER XXII.
CANAL-BOAT JOURNEYS: BOUND FAR WEST.
1842.
It would not be possible that a more vivid or exact impression than that which is derivable from these letters could be given of either the genius or the character of the writer. The whole man is here in the supreme hour of his life, and in all the enjoyment of its highest sensations. Inexpressibly sad to me has been the task of going over them, but the surprise has equaled the sadness. I had forgotten what was in them. That they contained, in their first vividness,[359] all the most prominent descriptions of his published book, I knew. But the reproduction of any part of these was not permissible here; and, believing that the substance of them had been thus almost wholly embodied in the American Notes, when they were lent to assist in its composition, I turned to them with very small expectation of finding anything available for present use. Yet the difficulty has been, not to find, but to reject; and the rejection when most unavoidable has not been most easy. Even where the subjects recur that are in the printed volume, there is a freshness of first impressions in the letters that renders it no small trial to act strictly on the rule adhered to in these extracts from them. In the Notes there is of course very much, masterly in observation and description, of which there is elsewhere no trace; but the passages amplified from the letters have not been improved, and the manly force and directness of some of their views and reflections, conveyed by touches of a picturesque completeness that no elaboration could give, have here and there not been strengthened by rhetorical additions in the printed work. There is also a charm in the letters which the plan adopted in the book necessarily excluded from it. It will always, of course, have value as a deliberate expression of the results gathered from the American experiences, but the personal narrative of this famous visit to America is in the letters alone. In what way his experiences arose, the desire at the outset to see nothing that was not favorable, the slowness with which adverse impressions were formed, and the eager recognition of every truthful and noble quality that arose and remained[360] above the fault-finding, are discoverable only in the letters.
It’s hard to imagine a more vibrant or accurate reflection of the writer's genius and character than what you can find in these letters. The full essence of the person is captured here during the peak of his life, enjoying its most intense feelings. Going through them has been incredibly sad for me, but the surprise I've felt has matched that sadness. I had forgotten the contents of these letters. I knew that their initial vividness included all the key descriptions from his published book. However, I couldn’t reproduce any part of these letters here; and thinking that their essence had been mostly included in the American Notes—when they were borrowed to help craft it—I approached them with little hope of finding anything useful. Yet, the challenge has been not finding material, but deciding what to leave out; and even when leaving something out was most necessary, it hasn’t been easy. Even when the topics in the printed volume resurface, there's a freshness in the letters that makes it difficult to stick strictly to the guidelines for these excerpts. The Notes include a lot of insightful observations and descriptions that aren’t found anywhere else; but the parts taken from the letters haven't been enhanced, and the strong clarity and straightforwardness of some of their thoughts and reflections, presented with a vividness that no extra detail could improve, have sometimes not been bolstered by rhetorical additions in the printed work. There’s also a charm in the letters that the book's structure couldn’t accommodate. It will always hold value as a thoughtful summary of the insights gained from the American experiences, but the personal narrative of this famous trip to America exists only within the letters. The way his experiences unfolded—the initial desire to see only the positive aspects, the gradual formation of negative impressions, and the eager recognition of every truthful and admirable quality that emerged above the criticism—can only be found in the letters.
Already it is manifest from them that the before-mentioned disappointments, as well of the guest in his entertainers as of the entertainers in their guest, had their beginning in the copyright differences; but it is not less plain that the social dissatisfactions on his side were of even earlier date, and with the country itself had certainly nothing to do. It was objected to him, I well remember, that in making such unfavorable remarks as his published book did on many points, he was assailing the democratic institutions that had formed the character of the nation; but the answer is obvious, that, democratic institutions being universal in America, they were as fairly entitled to share in the good as in the bad; and in what he praised, of which there is here abundant testimony, he must be held to have exalted those institutions as much, as in what he blamed he could be held to depreciate them. He never sets himself up in judgment on the entire people. As we see, from the way the letters show us that the opinions he afterwards published were formed, he does not draw conclusions while his observation is only half concluded; and he refrains throughout from the example too strongly set him, even in the very terms of his welcome by the writers of America,[56] of flinging one nation in the other's face. He leaves each upon its own ground. His great business in his publication, as in the first impressions recorded here, is to exhibit social influences at work as he saw them himself; and it would surely[361] have been of all bad compliments the worst, when resolving, in the tone and with the purpose of a friend, to make public what he had observed in America, if he had supposed that such a country would take truth amiss.
It's clear from them that the disappointments mentioned earlier, both from the guest towards his hosts and from the hosts towards their guest, began with the copyright issues. However, it's also obvious that the social discontent on his part existed even before that and had nothing to do with the country itself. I remember well that people objected to him, claiming that his negative remarks in his published book attacked the democratic institutions that shaped the nation. But the obvious response is that, since democratic institutions are universal in America, they deserve to receive equal credit for both the good and the bad. In praising what he did, which is well documented here, he elevated those institutions just as much as he could be said to criticize them for their flaws. He never puts himself in a position to judge the entire populace. From the letters, we see that the opinions he later published were shaped without drawing conclusions while he was still gathering observations. He avoids the temptation, even when welcomed by American writers, to pit one nation against the other. He leaves each on its own ground. His main aim in his publications, as well as in the first impressions recorded here, is to show the social influences at work as he saw them. It would have been the worst of insults, given his intention to share his observations in America in a friendly manner, if he believed that such a country would take offense to the truth.
There is, however, one thing to be especially remembered, as well in reading the letters as in judging of the book which was founded on them. It is a point to which I believe Mr. Emerson directed the attention of his countrymen. Everything of an objectionable kind, whether the author would have it so or not, stands out more prominently and distinctly than matter of the opposite description. The social sin is a more tangible thing than the social virtue. Pertinaciously to insist upon the charities and graces of life, is to outrage their quiet and unobtrusive character; but we incur the danger of extending the vulgarities and indecencies if we seem to countenance by omitting to expose them. And if this is only kept in view in reading what is here given, the proportion of censure will be found not to overbalance the just admiration and unexaggerated praise.
There is, however, one thing to remember, both when reading the letters and when judging the book based on them. I believe Mr. Emerson pointed this out to his fellow countrymen. Anything objectionable, whether the author intended it or not, stands out more clearly than the opposite kind of content. Social sin is a more tangible issue than social virtue. Insisting on the positive aspects of life can undermine their quiet and subtle nature, but we run the risk of highlighting the vulgarities and indecencies if we don't expose them. If this perspective is kept in mind while reading what is presented here, the amount of criticism will not overshadow the rightful admiration and sincere praise.
Apart from such considerations, it is to be also said, the letters, from which I am now printing exactly as they were written, have claims, as mere literature, of an unusual kind. Unrivaled quickness of observation, the rare faculty of seizing out of a multitude of things the thing only that is essential, the irresistible play of humor, such pathos as only humorists of this high order possess, and the unwearied unforced vivacity of ever fresh, buoyant, bounding animal spirits, never found more natural, variously easy, or picturesque expression.[362] Written amid such distraction, fatigue, and weariness as they describe, amid the jarring noises of hotels and streets, aboard steamers, on canal-boats, and in log huts, there is not an erasure in them. Not external objects only, but feelings, reflections, and thoughts, are photographed into visible forms with the same unexampled ease. They borrow no help from the matters of which they treat. They would have given, to the subjects described, old acquaintance and engrossing interest if they had been about a people in the moon. Of the personal character at the same time self-portrayed, others, whose emotions it less vividly awakens, will judge more calmly and clearly than myself. Yet to myself only can it be known how small were the services of friendship that sufficed to rouse all the sensibilities of this beautiful and noble nature. Throughout our life-long intercourse it was the same. His keenness of discrimination failed him never excepting here, when it was lost in the limitless extent of his appreciation of all kindly things; and never did he receive what was meant for a benefit that he was not eager to return it a hundredfold. No man more truly generous ever lived.
Aside from those points, I should also mention that the letters I’m printing exactly as they were written have unique literary qualities. They showcase an unmatched sharpness of observation, a rare ability to extract only what’s essential from a plethora of details, an irresistible sense of humor, and the kind of pathos that only top-tier humorists can convey. The lively and uplifting spirit shines through in a way that feels natural, varied, and picturesque. Even though they were written amidst distractions, fatigue, and weariness—as they describe themselves—in noisy hotels, bustling streets, on steamers, in canal boats, and in log cabins, there’s not a single correction in them. They skillfully capture not just external scenes but also feelings, reflections, and thoughts, all with remarkable ease. They don’t rely on the subjects they discuss for inspiration. Whether about people on Earth or those living on the moon, they bring a sense of familiarity and deep interest. As for the personal character being portrayed, those whose emotions aren’t as deeply stirred may judge more calmly and clearly than I can. Yet only I truly know how little the friendship offered was enough to awaken all the sensitivities of this beautiful and noble nature. Throughout our lives, it was always the same. His sharp discernment never wavered, except here, where it was overwhelmed by his infinite appreciation of all kind things. He never received a kindness meant for him without being eager to return it a hundredfold. No one more genuinely generous ever lived.[362]
His next letter was begun from "on board the canal-boat. Going to Pittsburgh. Monday, March twenty-eighth, 1842;" and the difficulties of rejection, to which reference has just been made, have been nowhere felt by me so much. Several of the descriptive masterpieces of the book are in it, with such touches of original freshness as might fairly have justified a reproduction of them in their first form. Among these are the Harrisburg coach on its way through the Susquehanna[363] valley; the railroad across the mountain; the brown-forester of the Mississippi, the interrogative man in pepper-and-salt, and the affecting scene of the emigrants put ashore as the steamer passes up the Ohio. But all that I may here give, bearing any resemblance to what is given in the Notes, are the opening sketch of the small creature on the top of the queer stage-coach, to which the printed version fails to do adequate justice, and an experience to which the interest belongs of having suggested the settlement of Eden in Martin Chuzzlewit. . . . "We left Baltimore last Thursday, the twenty-fourth, at half-past eight in the morning, by railroad; and got to a place called York, about twelve. There we dined, and took a stage-coach for Harrisburg; twenty-five miles further. This stage-coach was like nothing so much as the body of one of the swings you see at a fair set upon four wheels and roofed and covered at the sides with painted canvas. There were twelve inside! I, thank my stars, was on the box. The luggage was on the roof; among it, a good-sized dining-table, and a big rocking-chair. We also took up an intoxicated gentleman, who sat for ten miles between me and the coachman; and another intoxicated gentleman who got up behind, but in the course of a mile or two fell off without hurting himself, and was seen in the distant perspective reeling back to the grog-shop where we had found him. There were four horses to this land-ark, of course; but we did not perform the journey until after half-past six o'clock that night. . . . The first half of the journey was tame enough, but the second lay through the valley of the Susquehanah (I think I spell it right, but I haven't that[364] American Geography at hand), which is very beautiful. . . .
His next letter started with "on board the canal boat. Heading to Pittsburgh. Monday, March 28, 1842;" and I have never felt the difficulties of rejection more keenly. Several of the amazing descriptions in the book are included, with such fresh originality that it would have been fair to reproduce them in their original form. Among these are the Harrisburg coach traveling through the Susquehanna[363] valley, the railroad crossing the mountain, the brown-forester of the Mississippi, the inquisitive man in pepper-and-salt attire, and the moving scene of the emigrants being put ashore as the steamer moves up the Ohio. But all I can share here that resembles what is found in the Notes are the opening description of the little creature on top of the strange stagecoach, which the printed version doesn’t do justice to, and an experience that inspired the settlement of Eden in Martin Chuzzlewit. . . . "We left Baltimore last Thursday, the twenty-fourth, at 8:30 AM by railroad, and arrived at a place called York around noon. There, we had lunch and took a stagecoach for Harrisburg, twenty-five miles further. This stagecoach looked a lot like the body of a swing you see at a fair, set on four wheels and covered with painted canvas on the sides. There were twelve inside! Thankfully, I was on the box seat. The luggage was on the roof, including a good-sized dining table and a big rocking chair. We also picked up a drunk gentleman who sat between me and the driver for ten miles; and another drunk guy who got on the back but fell off after a mile or two without injuring himself, and was seen staggering back to the bar where we found him. There were four horses pulling this land-ark, of course, but we didn't take off until after 6:30 PM that night. . . . The first half of the journey was quite dull, but the second part went through the Susquehanna valley (I think I've spelled that right, but I don't have that[364] American Geography with me), which is really beautiful. . . .
"I think I formerly made a casual remark to you touching the precocity of the youth of this country. When we changed horses on this journey I got down to stretch my legs, refresh myself with a glass of whiskey-and-water, and shake the wet off my great-coat,—for it was raining very heavily, and continued to do so, all night. Mounting to my seat again, I observed something lying on the roof of the coach, which I took to be a rather large fiddle in a brown bag. In the course of ten miles or so, however, I discovered that it had a pair of dirty shoes at one end, and a glazed cap at the other; and further observation demonstrated it to be a small boy, in a snuff-colored coat, with his arms quite pinioned to his sides by deep forcing into his pockets. He was, I presume, a relative or friend of the coachman's, as he lay atop of the luggage, with his face towards the rain; and, except when a change of position brought his shoes in contact with my hat, he appeared to be asleep. Sir, when we stopped to water the horses, about two miles from Harrisburg, this thing slowly upreared itself to the height of three foot eight, and, fixing its eyes on me with a mingled expression of complacency, patronage, national independence, and sympathy for all outer barbarians and foreigners, said, in shrill piping accents, 'Well now, stranger, I guess you find this a'most like an English a'ternoon,—hey?' It is unnecessary to add that I thirsted for his blood. . . .
"I think I casually mentioned to you before about how advanced the youth in this country are. When we switched horses on this trip, I got off to stretch my legs, enjoy a glass of whiskey and water, and shake the rain off my coat, since it was pouring heavily and continued to rain all night. When I got back into my seat, I noticed something on the roof of the coach that I first thought was a pretty large fiddle in a brown bag. However, after about ten miles, I realized it had a pair of dirty shoes at one end and a cap at the other. Further inspection revealed it was a small boy in a brown coat, with his arms pinned to his sides from being stuffed into his pockets. I assumed he was a relative or friend of the coachman since he lay on top of the luggage, facing the rain, and aside from when a change in his position brought his shoes into contact with my hat, he seemed to be asleep. Sir, when we stopped to water the horses about two miles from Harrisburg, this little creature slowly sat up to a height of three foot eight, and fixing his eyes on me with a mix of self-satisfaction, superiority, patriotism, and pity for all outsiders and foreigners, said in high-pitched tones, 'Well now, stranger, I guess you find this almost like an English afternoon, huh?' It's needless to say that I was filled with a desire to take him down. . . ."
"We had all next morning in Harrisburg, as the canal-boat was not to start until three o'clock in the[365] afternoon. The officials called upon me before I had finished breakfast; and, as the town is the seat of the Pennsylvanian legislature, I went up to the Capitol. I was very much interested in looking over a number of treaties made with the poor Indians, their signatures being rough drawings of the creatures or weapons they are called after; and the extraordinary drawing of these emblems, showing the queer, unused, shaky manner in which each man has held the pen, struck me very much.
"We had all morning in Harrisburg since the canal-boat wasn't set to leave until three o'clock in the[365] afternoon. The officials came to see me before I had finished my breakfast, and since the town is home to the Pennsylvania legislature, I went up to the Capitol. I found it really interesting to look through several treaties made with the Native Americans, where their signatures were just rough drawings of the animals or weapons they were named after. The unique drawings of these symbols, which showed the unusual, shaky way each person held the pen, really struck me.
"You know my small respect for our House of Commons. These local legislatures are too insufferably apish of mighty legislation, to be seen without bile; for which reason, and because a great crowd of senators and ladies had assembled in both houses to behold the inimitable, and had already begun to pour in upon him even in the secretary's private room, I went back to the hotel, with all speed. The members of both branches of the legislature followed me there, however, so we had to hold the usual levee before our half-past one o'clock dinner. We received a great number of them. Pretty nearly every man spat upon the carpet, as usual; and one blew his nose with his fingers,—also on the carpet, which was a very neat one, the room given up to us being the private parlor of the landlord's wife. This has become so common since, however, that it scarcely seems worth mentioning. Please to observe that the gentleman in question was a member of the senate, which answers (as they very often tell me) to our House of Lords.
You know I don't have much respect for our House of Commons. These local legislatures are just too ridiculous when it comes to serious legislation; I can’t stand to watch them without feeling sick. That’s why, with a large crowd of senators and ladies gathered in both houses to see the spectacle, and they had already started to flood into the secretary's private room, I hurried back to the hotel. However, the members from both branches of the legislature followed me there, so we had to hold the usual gathering before our 1:30 PM dinner. We welcomed a lot of them. Almost every man spat on the carpet, as usual; and one guy used his fingers to wipe his nose—also on the carpet, which was actually very nice, since the room we were in was the private parlor of the landlord's wife. This has become so common since then that it hardly seems worth mentioning. Just so you know, the guy in question was a member of the senate, which they often tell me is like our House of Lords.
"The innkeeper was the most attentive, civil, and obliging person I ever saw in my life. On being asked[366] for his bill, he said there was no bill: the honor and pleasure, etc. being more than sufficient.[57] I did not permit this, of course, and begged Mr. Q. to explain to him that, traveling four strong, I could not hear of it on any account.
"The innkeeper was the most attentive, polite, and helpful person I have ever met. When I asked for my bill, he said there was no charge: the honor and pleasure, etc. were more than enough.[57] I didn't allow this, of course, and asked Mr. Q. to explain to him that, traveling with four people, I couldn’t accept that under any circumstances."
"And now I come to the Canal-Boat. Bless your heart and soul, my dear fellow,—if you could only see us on board the canal-boat! Let me think, for a moment, at what time of the day or night I should best like you to see us. In the morning? Between five and six in the morning, shall I say? Well! you would like to see me, standing on the deck, fishing the dirty water out of the canal with a tin ladle chained to the boat by a long chain; pouring the same into a tin basin (also chained up in like manner); and scrubbing my face with the jack towel. At night, shall I say? I don't know that you would like to look into the cabin at night, only to see me lying on a temporary shelf exactly the width of this sheet of paper when it's open (I measured it this morning),[58] with one man above me, and another below; and, in all, eight-and-twenty in a low cabin, which you can't stand upright in with your hat on. I don't think you would like to look in at breakfast-time either, for then these shelves have only just been taken down and put away, and the atmosphere of the place is, as you may suppose, by no means fresh; though there are upon the table tea and coffee, and bread and butter, and salmon, and shad, and liver, and steak, and potatoes, and pickles, and ham, and pudding, and sausages;[367] and three-and-thirty people sitting round it, eating and drinking; and savory bottles of gin, and whiskey, and brandy, and rum, in the bar hard by; and seven-and-twenty out of the eight-and-twenty men, in foul linen, with yellow streams from half-chewed tobacco trickling down their chins. Perhaps the best time for you to take a peep would be the present: eleven o'clock in the forenoon: when the barber is at his shaving, and the gentlemen are lounging about the stove waiting for their turns, and not more than seventeen are spitting in concert, and two or three are walking overhead (lying down on the luggage every time the man at the helm calls 'Bridge!'), and I am writing this in the ladies' cabin, which is a part of the gentlemen's, and only screened off by a red curtain. Indeed, it exactly resembles the dwarf's private apartment in a caravan at a fair; and the gentlemen, generally, represent the spectators at a penny a head. The place is just as clean and just as large as that caravan you and I were in at Greenwich Fair last past. Outside, it is exactly like any canal-boat you have seen near the Regent's Park, or elsewhere.
"And now I come to the canal boat. Bless your heart and soul, my dear friend—if only you could see us on board the canal boat! Let me think for a moment about when I’d like you to see us best. In the morning? Between five and six in the morning, should I say? Well! You would like to see me standing on the deck, fishing the dirty water out of the canal with a tin ladle chained to the boat by a long chain; pouring it into a tin basin (also chained just like that); and scrubbing my face with the jack towel. At night, should I say? I’m not sure you would want to peek into the cabin then, just to find me lying on a temporary shelf exactly the width of this sheet of paper when it's open (I measured it this morning), with one man above me and another below; and, in total, twenty-eight of us in a low cabin where you can’t stand up straight with your hat on. I don’t think you’d be keen to look in at breakfast time either, because the shelves have only just been taken down and put away, and the atmosphere, as you might guess, is by no means fresh; though there are tea and coffee, and bread and butter, and salmon, and shad, and liver, and steak, and potatoes, and pickles, and ham, and pudding, and sausages; and thirty-three people sitting around it, eating and drinking; and bottles of gin, whiskey, brandy, and rum in the bar nearby; and twenty-seven of the twenty-eight men are in dirty linen, with yellow streams from half-chewed tobacco dripping down their chins. Maybe the best time for you to take a look would be now: eleven o'clock in the morning, when the barber is shaving, and the gentlemen are lounging around the stove waiting for their turns, and not more than seventeen are spitting in sync, and a couple of guys are walking overhead (lying down on the luggage every time the guy at the helm calls 'Bridge!'), and I’m writing this in the ladies' cabin, which is part of the gentlemen's area, only separated by a red curtain. Indeed, it looks exactly like the dwarf's private room in a caravan at a fair; and the gentlemen generally represent the audience at a penny a head. The place is just as clean and as big as that caravan you and I visited at Greenwich Fair last time. Outside, it looks exactly like any canal boat you’ve seen near Regent’s Park or elsewhere."
"You never can conceive what the hawking and spitting is, the whole night through. Last night was the worst. Upon my honor and word I was obliged, this morning, to lay my fur coat on the deck, and wipe the half-dried flakes of spittle from it with my handkerchief; and the only surprise seemed to be that I should consider it necessary to do so. When I turned in last night, I put it on a stool beside me, and there it lay, under a cross-fire from five men,—three opposite, one above, and one below. I make no complaints, and[368] show no disgust. I am looked upon as highly facetious at night, for I crack jokes with everybody near me until we fall asleep. I am considered very hardy in the morning, for I run up, bare-necked, and plunge my head into the half-frozen water, by half-past five o'clock. I am respected for my activity, inasmuch as I jump from the boat to the towing-path, and walk five or six miles before breakfast; keeping up with the horses all the time. In a word, they are quite astonished to find a sedentary Englishman roughing it so well, and taking so much exercise; and question me very much on that head. The greater part of the men will sit and shiver round the stove all day, rather than put one foot before the other. As to having a window open, that's not to be thought of.
You can't imagine how much hawking and spitting goes on all night. Last night was the worst. Honestly, this morning, I had to lay my fur coat on the deck and wipe the half-dried spit off it with my handkerchief; and the only surprise was that I felt it was necessary to do that. When I went to bed last night, I put it on a stool next to me, and it was getting hit from five directions—three across from me, one above, and one below. I don't complain and don’t show any disgust. People think I'm really funny at night because I joke around with everyone until we fall asleep. In the morning, I’m seen as pretty tough since I jump up, bare-necked, and dunk my head into the half-frozen water by around 5:30. I'm respected for being active because I jump from the boat to the towing path and walk five or six miles before breakfast, keeping pace with the horses the whole time. In short, they are quite surprised to see a sedentary Englishman handling it so well and getting so much exercise, and they ask me a lot about it. Most of the guys will sit shivering around the stove all day rather than take a step. As for having a window open, that's out of the question.
"We expect to reach Pittsburgh to-night, between eight and nine o'clock; and there we ardently hope to find your March letters awaiting us. We have had, with the exception of Friday afternoon, exquisite weather, but cold. Clear starlight and moonlight nights. The canal has run, for the most part, by the side of the Susquehanah and Iwanata rivers; and has been carried through tremendous obstacles. Yesterday we crossed the mountain. This is done by railroad. . . . You dine at an inn upon the mountain; and, including the half-hour allowed for the meal, are rather more than five hours performing this strange part of the journey. The people north and 'down east' have terrible legends of its danger; but they appear to be exceedingly careful, and don't go to work at all wildly. There are some queer precipices close to the rails, certainly; but every precaution is taken, I am inclined to[369] think, that such difficulties, and such a vast work, will admit of.
"We expect to reach Pittsburgh tonight between eight and nine o'clock, and we really hope to find your March letters waiting for us there. We've had, except for Friday afternoon, beautiful weather, but it's been cold. Clear nights with starlight and moonlight. The canal has mostly run alongside the Susquehanna and Iwanata rivers and has faced some massive challenges. Yesterday, we crossed the mountain. This is done by railroad. . . You have dinner at an inn on the mountain, and including the half-hour for the meal, it takes a little over five hours to complete this unusual part of the journey. People from the north and 'down east' have terrible stories about its danger, but they seem to be very cautious and don't act recklessly at all. There are some odd cliffs right by the tracks, for sure, but I'm inclined to think that every precaution is taken, given the difficulties and the scale of this project."
"The scenery, before you reach the mountains, and when you are on them, and after you have left them, is very grand and fine; and the canal winds its way through some deep, sullen gorges, which, seen by moonlight, are very impressive: though immeasurably inferior to Glencoe, to whose terrors I have not seen the smallest approach. We have passed, both in the mountains and elsewhere, a great number of new settlements and detached log houses. Their utterly forlorn and miserable appearance baffles all description. I have not seen six cabins out of six hundred, where the windows have been whole. Old hats, old clothes, old boards, old fragments of blanket and paper, are stuffed into the broken glass; and their air is misery and desolation. It pains the eye to see the stumps of great trees thickly strewn in every field of wheat; and never to lose the eternal swamp and dull morass, with hundreds of rotten trunks, of elm and pine and sycamore and logwood, steeped in its unwholesome water; where the frogs so croak at night that after dark there is an incessant sound as if millions of phantom teams, with bells, were traveling through the upper air, at an enormous distance off. It is quite an oppressive circumstance, too, to come upon great tracks, where settlers have been burning down the trees; and where their wounded bodies lie about, like those of murdered creatures; while here and there some charred and blackened giant rears two bare arms aloft, and seems to curse his enemies. The prettiest sight I have seen was yesterday,[370] when we—on the heights of the mountain, and in a keen wind—looked down into a valley full of light and softness; catching glimpses of scattered cabins; children running to the doors; dogs bursting out to bark; pigs scampering home, like so many prodigal sons; families sitting out in their gardens; cows gazing upward, with a stupid indifference; men in their shirt-sleeves, looking on at their unfinished houses, and planning work for to-morrow;—and the train riding on, high above them, like a storm. But I know this is beautiful—very—very beautiful!
The scenery before you reach the mountains, while you're on them, and after you've left them is really grand and beautiful. The canal winds its way through deep, gloomy gorges that, seen by moonlight, are quite striking, although they’re no match for Glencoe, which I haven't seen even come close to. Along the way, in the mountains and elsewhere, we've passed countless new settlements and isolated log houses. Their hopeless and miserable appearance defies description. Out of six hundred cabins, I haven’t seen six with intact windows. Old hats, worn clothes, broken boards, and scraps of blanket and paper are stuffed into the shattered glass, creating an atmosphere of misery and desolation. It's painful to see the stumps of huge trees scattered in every field of wheat, while the constant presence of the eternal swamp and dull bog, filled with hundreds of decaying trunks of elm, pine, sycamore, and logwood, soaked in unhealthy water, is unavoidable. At night, the frogs croak so loudly that it sounds as if millions of ghostly teams with bells are traveling through the upper air, far in the distance. It's also quite oppressive to come across large areas where settlers have been burning down trees, leaving their charred remains on the ground like the bodies of slain animals, while here and there some blackened giants raise two bare arms high, seeming to curse their foes. The most beautiful sight I’ve seen was yesterday, [370] when we, on the mountain heights in a brisk wind, looked down into a valley filled with light and warmth, catching glimpses of scattered cabins, children running to the door, dogs bursting out to bark, pigs hurriedly returning home like wayward sons, families relaxing in their gardens, cows staring up with blank indifference, and men in their shirtsleeves watching their unfinished houses and planning tomorrow’s work—while the train moved on high above them like a storm. But I know this is beautiful—truly, very beautiful!
"I wonder whether you and Mac mean to go to Greenwich Fair! Perhaps you dine at the Crown and Sceptre to-day, for it's Easter-Monday—who knows! I wish you drank punch, dear Forster. It's a shabby thing, not to be able to picture you with that cool green glass. . . .
"I wonder if you and Mac are planning to go to Greenwich Fair! Maybe you're having dinner at the Crown and Sceptre today, since it's Easter Monday—who knows! I wish you enjoyed punch, dear Forster. It's such a letdown not to be able to picture you with that cool green glass. . . ."
"I told you of the many uses of the word 'fix.' I ask Mr. Q. on board a steamboat if breakfast be nearly ready, and he tells me yes he should think so, for when he was last below the steward was 'fixing the tables'—in other words, laying the cloth. When we have been writing, and I beg him (do you remember anything of my love of order, at this distance of time?) to collect our papers, he answers that he'll 'fix 'em presently.' So when a man's dressing he's 'fixing' himself, and when you put yourself under a doctor he 'fixes' you in no time. T'other night, before we came on board here, when I had ordered a bottle of mulled claret and waited some time for it, it was put on table with an apology from the landlord (a lieutenant-colonel) that 'he feared it wasn't fixed properly.' And here, on Saturday morning,[371] a Western man, handing the potatoes to Mr. Q. at breakfast, inquired if he wouldn't take some of 'these fixings' with his meat. I remained as grave as a judge. I catch them looking at me sometimes, and feel that they think I don't take any notice. Politics are very high here; dreadfully strong; handbills, denunciations, invectives, threats, and quarrels. The question is, who shall be the next President. The election comes off in three years and a half from this time."
"I told you about the many uses of the word 'fix.' I asked Mr. Q. on a steamboat if breakfast was almost ready, and he said yes, he thought so, because when he was last down below, the steward was 'fixing the tables'—in other words, setting the cloth. After we had been writing, and I asked him (do you remember anything about my love of order, even now?) to gather our papers, he replied that he'd 'fix 'em shortly.' So when a man is getting dressed, he's 'fixing' himself, and when you see a doctor, he 'fixes' you in no time. The other night, before we came on board here, when I had ordered a bottle of mulled claret and waited a while for it, it was brought to the table with an apology from the landlord (a lieutenant-colonel) that 'he feared it wasn't fixed properly.' And here, on Saturday morning,[371] a Western man, handing the potatoes to Mr. Q. at breakfast, asked if he wouldn't like some of 'these fixings' with his meat. I stayed as serious as a judge. I catch them looking at me sometimes, and I feel they think I don't notice. Politics are very intense here; extremely strong; handbills, denunciations, insults, threats, and disputes. The question is, who will be the next President. The election is happening in three years and a half from now."
He resumed his letter, "on board the steamboat from Pittsburgh to Cincinnati, April the 1st, 1842. A very tremulous steamboat, which makes my hand shake. This morning, my dear friend, this very morning, which, passing by without bringing news from England, would have seen us on our way to St. Louis (viâ Cincinnati and Louisville) with sad hearts and dejected countenances, and the prospect of remaining for at least three weeks longer without any intelligence of those so inexpressibly dear to us—this very morning, bright and lucky morning that it was, a great packet was brought to our bedroom door, from HOME. How I have read and re-read your affectionate, hearty, interesting, funny, serious, delightful, and thoroughly Forsterian Columbia letter, I will not attempt to tell you; or how glad I am that you liked my first; or how afraid I am that my second was not written in such good spirits as it should have been; or how glad I am again to think that my third was; or how I hope you will find some amusement from my fourth: this present missive. All this, and more affectionate and earnest words than the post-office would convey at any price, though they have no sharp edges to hurt the stamping-clerk—you will understand,[372] I know, without expression, or attempt at expression. So, having got over the first agitation of so much pleasure; and having walked the deck; and being now in the cabin, where one party are playing at chess, and another party are asleep, and another are talking round the stove, and all are spitting; and a persevering bore of a horrible New Englander with a droning voice like a gigantic bee will sit down beside me, though I am writing, and talk incessantly, in my very ear, to Kate; here goes again.
He continued his letter, "on board the steamboat from Pittsburgh to Cincinnati, April 1st, 1842. A very shaky steamboat that makes my hand tremble. This morning, my dear friend, this very morning, which, if it had passed without news from England, would have found us on our way to St. Louis (via Cincinnati and Louisville) with heavy hearts and gloomy faces, facing at least three more weeks without any updates about those who mean so much to us—this very bright and lucky morning, a big packet was delivered to our bedroom door, from HOME. I can't even express how many times I've read and re-read your warm, heartfelt, interesting, funny, serious, delightful, and thoroughly Forsterian Columbia letter; or how happy I am that you liked my first; or how worried I am that my second wasn't written in as good spirits as it should have been; or how relieved I am again to think that my third was; or how I hope you'll find some enjoyment in my fourth: this current letter. All of this, and more affectionate and sincere sentiments than the post office could deliver at any cost, even though they have no sharp edges to bother the stamping clerk—you will understand,[372] I know, without needing any expression or attempt at expression. So, having gotten over the initial excitement of such happiness; and having walked the deck; and now being in the cabin, where one group is playing chess, another group is asleep, and another is chatting around the stove, and everyone is spitting; and an annoying bore of a dreadful New Englander with a droning voice like a giant bee will sit down next to me, even though I’m writing, and talk nonstop, right in my ear, to Kate; here I go again.
"Let me see. I should tell you, first, that we got to Pittsburgh between eight and nine o'clock of the evening of the day on which I left off at the top of this sheet; and were there received by a little man (a very little man) whom I knew years ago in London. He rejoiceth in the name of D. G.; and, when I knew him, was in partnership with his father on the Stock-Exchange, and lived handsomely at Dalston. They failed in business soon afterwards, and then this little man began to turn to account what had previously been his amusement and accomplishment, by painting little subjects for the fancy shops. So I lost sight of him, nearly ten years ago; and here he turned up t'other day, as a portrait-painter in Pittsburgh! He had previously written me a letter which moved me a good deal, by a kind of quiet independence and contentment it breathed, and still a painful sense of being alone, so very far from home. I received it in Philadelphia, and answered it. He dined with us every day of our stay in Pittsburgh (they were only three), and was truly gratified and delighted to find me unchanged,—more so than I can tell you. I am very glad to-night to[373] think how much happiness we have fortunately been able to give him.
"Let me think. I should tell you that we arrived in Pittsburgh between eight and nine o'clock in the evening on the day I stopped writing on the top of this page; and we were welcomed by a little man (a very little man) whom I knew years ago in London. He goes by the name of D. G.; back when I knew him, he was in business with his father on the Stock Exchange and lived comfortably in Dalston. They went bankrupt not long after, and then this little man started using what had once been his hobby and talent to paint small pieces for novelty shops. I lost track of him nearly ten years ago, and then he appeared the other day as a portrait artist in Pittsburgh! He had previously sent me a letter that really moved me, with a sense of quiet independence and contentment, yet still a painful feeling of loneliness, so far from home. I got it in Philadelphia and wrote back. He joined us for dinner every day of our short stay in Pittsburgh (which lasted only three days) and was genuinely thrilled to see that I hadn’t changed, more so than I can express. I'm really happy tonight to think about how much joy we’ve been fortunate enough to bring him."
"Pittsburgh is like Birmingham—at least its townsfolks say so; and I didn't contradict them. It is, in one respect. There is a great deal of smoke in it. I quite offended a man at our yesterday's levee, who supposed I was 'now quite at home,' by telling him that the notion of London being so dark a place was a popular mistake. We had very queer customers at our receptions, I do assure you. Not least among them, a gentleman with his inexpressibles imperfectly buttoned and his waistband resting on his thighs, who stood behind the half-opened door, and could by no temptation or inducement be prevailed upon to come out. There was also another gentleman, with one eye and one fixed gooseberry, who stood in a corner, motionless like an eight-day clock, and glared upon me, as I courteously received the Pittsburgians. There were also two red-headed brothers—boys—young dragons rather—who hovered about Kate, and wouldn't go. A great crowd they were, for three days; and a very queer one."
"Pittsburgh is kind of like Birmingham—at least that's what the locals say; and I didn't argue with them. In one way, it really is. There's a lot of smoke. I upset a guy at yesterday's social event who thought I was 'now quite at home' by telling him that the idea of London being so dark was a common misconception. We had some really odd guests at our receptions, I assure you. Not least among them was a guy with his pants barely buttoned and his waistband hanging on his thighs, who stood behind the half-open door and wouldn’t budge no matter what. There was also another guy, with one eye and a fixed stare like a gooseberry, who stood motionless in a corner, glaring at me while I politely greeted the folks from Pittsburgh. And then there were two red-headed brothers—really just boys—who flitted around Kate and wouldn’t leave. They were quite the crowd, for three days; and a very strange one."
"Still in the same situation. April the Second, 1842.
"Many, many happy returns of the day. It's only eight o'clock in the morning now, but we mean to drink your health after dinner, in a bumper; and scores of Richmond dinners to us! We have some wine (a present sent on board by our Pittsburgh landlord) in our own cabin; and we shall tap it to good purpose, I assure you; wishing you all manner and kinds of happiness, and a long life to ourselves that we may be[374] partakers of it. We have wondered a hundred times already, whether you and Mac will dine anywhere together, in honor of the day. I say yes, but Kate says no. She predicts that you'll ask Mac, and he won't go. I have not yet heard from him.
"Happy birthday! It's only eight in the morning right now, but we plan to raise a glass to your health after dinner, and here's to all the great dinners in Richmond! We have some wine (a gift from our landlord in Pittsburgh) in our cabin, and we’ll definitely make good use of it, wishing you all sorts of happiness and a long life for ourselves so we can enjoy it with you. We’ve wondered a hundred times if you and Mac will have dinner together to celebrate. I think you will, but Kate disagrees. She thinks you’ll invite Mac, and he won’t come. I haven't heard from him yet."
"We have a better cabin here than we had on board the Britannia; the berths being much wider, and the den having two doors: one opening on the ladies' cabin, and one upon a little gallery in the stern of the boat. We expect to be at Cincinnati some time on Monday morning, and we carry about fifty passengers. The cabin for meals goes right through the boat, from the prow to the stern, and is very long; only a small portion of it being divided off, by a partition of wood and ground glass, for the ladies. We breakfast at half-after seven, dine at one, and sup at six. Nobody will sit down to any one of these meals, though the dishes are smoking on the board, until the ladies have appeared and taken their chairs. It was the same in the canal-boat.
"We have a better cabin here than we had on the Britannia; the beds are much wider, and the room has two doors: one leading to the ladies' cabin and another to a small balcony at the back of the boat. We expect to arrive in Cincinnati sometime on Monday morning, and we have about fifty passengers. The dining area runs the entire length of the boat, from the front to the back, and it's quite long; only a small section is separated off by a wooden and frosted glass partition for the ladies. We have breakfast at 7:30 AM, lunch at 1 PM, and dinner at 6 PM. No one will sit down for any of these meals, even with the dishes steaming on the table, until the ladies have arrived and taken their seats. It was the same on the canal boat."
"The washing department is a little more civilized than it was on the canal, but bad is the best. Indeed, the Americans when they are traveling, as Miss Martineau seems disposed to admit, are exceedingly negligent; not to say dirty. To the best of my making out, the ladies, under most circumstances, are content with smearing their hands and faces in a very small quantity of water. So are the men; who superadd to that mode of ablution a hasty use of the common brush and comb. It is quite a practice, too, to wear but one cotton shirt a week, and three or four fine linen fronts. Anne reports that this is Mr. Q.'s course of proceeding; and my portrait-painting[375] friend told me that it was the case with pretty nearly all his sitters; so that when he bought a piece of cloth not long ago, and instructed the sempstress to make it all into shirts, not fronts, she thought him deranged.
The washing area is a bit more civilized than it was on the canal, but it's still not great. In fact, as Miss Martineau seems to agree, Americans when they travel are pretty careless, if not downright dirty. From what I've gathered, women, in most cases, are fine with just smearing their hands and faces with a tiny amount of water. The men do something similar, adding a quick use of a shared brush and comb. It's also common for them to wear just one cotton shirt a week and three or four nice linen fronts. Anne says this is how Mr. Q. behaves; my friend who paints portraits told me it's the same with almost all his clients. So when he bought some cloth recently and asked the seamstress to make it all into shirts, not fronts, she thought he was out of his mind.
"My friend the New Englander, of whom I wrote last night, is perhaps the most intolerable bore on this vast continent. He drones, and snuffles, and writes poems, and talks small philosophy and metaphysics, and never will be quiet, under any circumstances. He is going to a great temperance convention at Cincinnati; along with a doctor of whom I saw something at Pittsburgh. The doctor, in addition to being everything that the New Englander is, is a phrenologist besides. I dodge them about the boat. Whenever I appear on deck, I see them bearing down upon me—and fly. The New Englander was very anxious last night that he and I should 'form a magnetic chain,' and magnetize the doctor, for the benefit of all incredulous passengers; but I declined on the plea of tremendous occupation in the way of letter-writing.
"My friend from New England, whom I mentioned last night, is probably the most unbearable bore on this huge continent. He drones on, sniffles, writes poems, talks about trivial philosophy and metaphysics, and will never be quiet, no matter what. He’s going to a big temperance convention in Cincinnati, along with a doctor I heard a bit about in Pittsburgh. The doctor, besides being everything the New Englander is, is also a phrenologist. I avoid them on the boat. Whenever I show up on deck, I see them heading my way—and I take off. The New Englander was very eager last night for us to 'form a magnetic chain' and magnetize the doctor, to entertain all the skeptical passengers; but I said no, claiming I was too busy with letter-writing."
"And, speaking of magnetism, let me tell you that the other night at Pittsburgh, there being present only Mr. Q. and the portrait-painter, Kate sat down, laughing, for me to try my hand upon her. I had been holding forth upon the subject rather luminously, and asserting that I thought I could exercise the influence, but had never tried. In six minutes, I magnetized her into hysterics, and then into the magnetic sleep. I tried again next night, and she fell into the slumber in little more than two minutes. . . . I can wake her with perfect ease; but I confess (not being prepared for anything so sudden and complete) I was on the first occasion[376] rather alarmed. . . . The Western parts being sometimes hazardous, I have fitted out the whole of my little company with Life-Preservers, which I inflate with great solemnity when we get aboard any boat, and keep, as Mrs. Cluppins did her umbrella in the court of common pleas, ready for use upon a moment's notice." . . .
"And speaking of magnetism, let me tell you that the other night in Pittsburgh, when only Mr. Q. and the portrait artist were there, Kate sat down laughing for me to try my hand at drawing her. I had been talking quite animatedly about the topic and claiming I thought I could exert that influence, but had never actually tried it. In six minutes, I had her in hysterics and then into a magnetic sleep. I tried again the next night, and she fell asleep in just over two minutes. I can wake her up easily, but I admit (not being prepared for anything so sudden and complete) I was quite alarmed the first time. The western regions can sometimes be risky, so I've equipped my whole little group with Life Preservers, which I inflate with great seriousness whenever we get on a boat, and keep, just like Mrs. Cluppins did with her umbrella in the court of common pleas, ready for immediate use."
He resumed his letter, on "Sunday, April the third," with allusion to a general who had called upon him in Washington with two literary ladies, and had written to him next day for an immediate interview, as "the two LL's" were ambitious of the honor of a personal introduction. "Besides the doctor and the dread New Englander, we have on board that valiant general who wrote to me about the 'two LL's.' He is an old, old man with a weazen face, and the remains of a pigeon-breast in his military surtout. He is acutely gentlemanly and officer-like. The breast has so subsided, and the face has become so strongly marked, that he seems, like a pigeon-pie, to show only the feet of the bird outside, and to keep the rest to himself. He is perhaps the most horrible bore in this country. And I am quite serious when I say that I do not believe there are, on the whole earth besides, so many intensified bores as in these United States. No man can form an adequate idea of the real meaning of the word, without coming here. There are no particular characters on board, with these three exceptions. Indeed, I seldom see the passengers but at meal-times, as I read and write in our own little state-room. . . . I have smuggled two chairs into our crib, and write this on a book upon my knee. Everything is in the neatest order, of course; and my shaving-tackle, dressing-case, brushes, books,[377] and papers, are arranged with as much precision as if we were going to remain here a month. Thank God we are not.
He continued his letter, on "Sunday, April 3rd," mentioning a general who had visited him in Washington with two literary women and had written to him the next day for an urgent meeting, as "the two LL's" were eager for a personal introduction. "Besides the doctor and the dreaded New Englander, we have on board that brave general who wrote to me about the 'two LL's.' He’s really old with a wrinkled face and what's left of a pigeon chest in his military coat. He comes off as very gentlemanly and officer-like. The chest has sunk so much, and his face has become so weathered, that he seems, like a pigeon pie, to show only the bird’s feet outside and keeps the rest to himself. He is probably the most tedious bore in this country. I’m serious when I say that I don’t think there are, anywhere else in the world, so many extreme bores as in the United States. No one can truly grasp the full meaning of the word without coming here. There are no distinct characters on board, except for these three. In fact, I hardly see the other passengers except at mealtimes, as I read and write in our own little cabin. I’ve sneaked two chairs into our space and am writing this on a book in my lap. Everything is arranged very neatly, of course; my shaving kit, toiletries, brushes, books,[377] and papers are organized with as much care as if we were going to stay here for a month. Thank God we are not.
"The average width of the river rather exceeds that of the Thames at Greenwich. In parts it is much broader; and then there is usually a green island, covered with trees, dividing it into two streams. Occasionally we stop for a few minutes at a small town, or village (I ought to say city, everything is a city here); but the banks are for the most part deep solitudes, overgrown with trees, which, in these western latitudes, are already in leaf, and very green. . . .
The average width of the river is actually greater than that of the Thames at Greenwich. In some areas, it's much wider, often with a green island full of trees splitting it into two streams. Sometimes we take a quick break in a small town or village (I should say city, since everything feels like a city here); but mostly, the banks are quiet and secluded, overrun with trees that, in these western regions, are already in leaf and very green.
"All this I see, as I write, from the little door into the stern-gallery which I mentioned just now. It don't happen six times in a day that any other passenger comes near it; and, as the weather is amply warm enough to admit of our sitting with it open, here we remain from morning until night: reading, writing, talking. What our theme of conversation is, I need not tell you. No beauty or variety makes us weary less for home. We count the days, and say, 'When May comes, and we can say—next month—the time will seem almost gone.' We are never tired of imagining what you are all about. I allow of no calculation for the difference of clocks, but insist on a corresponding minute in London. It is much the shortest way, and best. . . . Yesterday, we drank your health and many happy returns—in wine, after dinner; in a small milk-pot jug of gin-punch, at night. And when I made a temporary table, to hold the little candlestick, of one of my dressing-case trays; cunningly inserted under the mattress of my berth with a weight atop of it to[378] keep it in its place, so that it made a perfectly exquisite bracket; we agreed, that, please God, this should be a joke at the Star and Garter on the second of April eighteen hundred and forty-three. If your blank can be surpassed, . . . believe me ours transcends it. My heart gets, sometimes, sore for home.
All this I see, as I write, from the little door into the stern-gallery that I just mentioned. It doesn’t happen six times a day that any other passenger comes near it; and since the weather is warm enough to keep it open, we stay here from morning till night: reading, writing, talking. I don’t need to tell you what we talk about. No beauty or variety makes us any less homesick. We count the days, saying, “When May comes, and we can say—next month—the time will feel almost gone.” We never get tired of imagining what you all are doing. I don’t factor in the difference of clocks and just focus on a corresponding minute in London. It’s the simplest and best way. . . . Yesterday, we toasted to your health and many happy returns—in wine after dinner; in a small milk jug filled with gin punch at night. And when I made a temporary table to hold the little candlestick out of one of my dressing-case trays, cleverly placed under the mattress of my berth with a weight on top to[378] keep it steady, creating a perfectly neat bracket; we agreed, God willing, this should be a joke at the Star and Garter on April 2nd, eighteen hundred and forty-three. If your blank can be surpassed, . . . believe me ours exceeds it. My heart sometimes feels sore spot for home.
"At Pittsburgh I saw another solitary confinement prison: Pittsburgh being also in Pennsylvania. A horrible thought occurred to me when I was recalling all I had seen, that night. What if ghosts be one of the terrors of these jails? I have pondered on it often, since then. The utter solitude by day and night; the many hours of darkness; the silence of death; the mind forever brooding on melancholy themes, and having no relief; sometimes an evil conscience very busy; imagine a prisoner covering up his head in the bedclothes and looking out from time to time, with a ghastly dread of some inexplicable silent figure that always sits upon his bed, or stands (if a thing can be said to stand, that never walks as men do) in the same corner of his cell. The more I think of it, the more certain I feel that not a few of these men (during a portion of their imprisonment at least) are nightly visited by spectres. I did ask one man in this last jail, if he dreamed much. He gave me a most extraordinary look, and said—under his breath—in a whisper, 'No.'"
"At Pittsburgh, I saw another solitary confinement prison, since Pittsburgh is also in Pennsylvania. A chilling thought struck me as I remembered everything I had seen that night. What if ghosts are one of the horrors of these jails? I've thought about it a lot since then. The complete isolation day and night; the long hours of darkness; the silence of death; the mind constantly fixating on sad thoughts with no escape; sometimes an agitated conscience; picture a prisoner pulling the blankets over his head and peering out occasionally, haunted by an indescribable, silent figure that always sits on his bed or stands (if you can say something that never walks like a person can stands) in the same corner of his cell. The more I consider it, the more convinced I become that some of these men (at least during part of their time in prison) are visited at night by spirits. I asked one man in this last jail if he dreamed a lot. He gave me a very unusual look and said—barely audible—in a whisper, 'No.'"
"Cincy. Fourth April, 1842.
"We arrived here this morning: about three o'clock, I believe, but I was fast asleep in my berth. I turned out soon after six, dressed, and breakfasted on board. About half-after eight, we came ashore and drove to the[379] hotel, to which we had written on from Pittsburgh ordering rooms; and which is within a stone's throw of the boat-wharf. Before I had issued an official notification that we were 'not at home,' two Judges called, on the part of the inhabitants, to know when we would receive the townspeople. We appointed to-morrow morning, from half-past eleven to one; arranged to go out, with these two gentlemen, to see the town, at one; and were fixed for an evening party to-morrow night at the house of one of them. On Wednesday morning we go on by the mail-boat to Louisville, a trip of fourteen hours; and from that place proceed in the next good boat to St. Louis, which is a voyage of four days. Finding from my judicial friends (well-informed and most agreeable gentlemen) this morning that the prairie travel to Chicago is a very fatiguing one, and that the lakes are stormy, sea-sicky, and not over safe at this season, I wrote by our captain to St. Louis (for the boat that brought us here goes on there) to the effect, that I should not take the lake route, but should come back here; and should visit the prairies, which are within thirty miles of St. Louis, immediately on my arrival there. . . .
"We got here this morning, around three o'clock, I think, but I was fast asleep in my cabin. I got up shortly after six, got dressed, and had breakfast on board. At about half past eight, we came ashore and drove to the[379] hotel, where we had made a reservation from Pittsburgh for rooms; it's just a short walk from the boat dock. Before I could officially let everyone know we were 'not at home,' two judges came by, representing the locals, to ask when we would be available to meet the townspeople. We scheduled that for tomorrow morning, from half past eleven until one; planned to go out with these two gentlemen to see the town at one; and had an evening party tomorrow night at one of their homes. On Wednesday morning, we’ll take the mail-boat to Louisville, which will take about fourteen hours; from there, we’ll head to St. Louis on the next good boat, which is a four-day trip. My judicial friends, who are well-informed and very pleasant gentlemen, told me this morning that traveling over the prairie to Chicago is quite exhausting, and that the lakes can be stormy, cause seasickness, and aren't very safe this time of year. So, I wrote to St. Louis through our captain (since the boat that brought us here is going there) to let them know that I wouldn’t be taking the lake route, but instead would come back here and visit the prairies, which are just thirty miles from St. Louis, as soon as I arrive there. . . ."
"I have walked to the window, since I turned this page, to see what aspect the town wears. We are in a wide street: paved in the carriage-way with small white stones, and in the footway with small red tiles. The houses are for the most part one story high; some are of wood; others of a clean white brick. Nearly all have green blinds outside every window. The principal shops over the way are, according to the inscriptions over them, a Large Bread Bakery; a Book Bindery; a[380] Dry Goods Store; and a Carriage Repository; the last-named establishment looking very like an exceedingly small retail coal-shed. On the pavement under our window, a black man is chopping wood; and another black man is talking (confidentially) to a pig. The public table, at this hotel and at the hotel opposite, has just now finished dinner. The diners are collected on the pavement, on both sides of the way, picking their teeth, and talking. The day being warm, some of them have brought chairs into the street. Some are on three chairs; some on two; and some, in defiance of all known laws of gravity, are sitting quite comfortably on one: with three of the chair's legs, and their own two, high up in the air. The loungers, underneath our window, are talking of a great Temperance convention which comes off here to-morrow. Others, about me. Others, about England. Sir Robert Peel is popular here, with everybody. . . ."
"I walked to the window since I turned this page to see what the town looks like. We are on a wide street: the road is paved with small white stones, and the sidewalk is covered with small red tiles. Most of the houses are one story tall; some are wooden, and others have clean white brick facades. Almost all of them have green shutters on every window. The main shops across the street, according to the signs above them, are a Large Bread Bakery, a Book Bindery, a[380] Dry Goods Store, and a Carriage Repository, which looks very much like a tiny retail coal shed. On the pavement below our window, a Black man is chopping wood, and another Black man is talking quietly to a pig. The public dining area at this hotel and the one opposite has just finished dinner. The diners have gathered on the pavement on both sides of the street, picking their teeth and chatting. Since the day is warm, some have brought chairs into the street. Some are sitting on three chairs, some on two, and some, defying all known laws of gravity, are sitting quite comfortably on one chair: with three legs of the chair and their own two legs up in the air. The people lounging under our window are discussing a big Temperance convention happening here tomorrow. Others are talking about various topics. Sir Robert Peel is popular with everyone here. . . ."
CHAPTER XXIII.
THE FAR WEST: TO NIAGARA FALLS.
1842.
The next letter described his experiences in the Far West, his stay in St. Louis, his visit to a prairie, the return to Cincinnati, and, after a stage-coach ride from that city to Columbus, the travel thence to Sandusky, and so, by Lake Erie, to the Falls of Niagara. All these subjects appear in the Notes, but nothing printed[382] there is repeated in the extracts now to be given. Of the closing passages of his journey, when he turned from Columbus in the direction of home, the story, here for the first time told, is in his most characteristic vein; the account that will be found of the prairie will probably be preferred to what is given in the Notes; the Cincinnati sketches are very pleasant; and even such a description as that of the Niagara Falls, of which so much is made in the book, has here an independent novelty and freshness. The first vividness is in his letter. The naturalness of associating no image or sense but of repose, with a grandeur so mighty and resistless, is best presented suddenly; and, in a few words, we have the material as well as moral beauty of a scene unrivaled in its kind upon the earth. The instant impression we find to be worth more than the eloquent recollection.
The next letter talks about his experiences in the Far West, his time in St. Louis, his visit to a prairie, returning to Cincinnati, and after a stagecoach trip from that city to Columbus, traveling from there to Sandusky, and then, by Lake Erie, to Niagara Falls. All these topics are mentioned in the Notes, but nothing printed[382] there is repeated in the excerpts to follow. The final parts of his journey, when he left Columbus heading home, tell a story, shared here for the first time, that reflects his true style; the description of the prairie will likely be favored over what’s included in the Notes; the sketches of Cincinnati are quite enjoyable; and even his description of Niagara Falls, which is heavily emphasized in the book, has a unique freshness here. The initial vividness is captured in his letter. The natural way he connects the idea of peacefulness with such powerful and overwhelming grandeur is best conveyed in a sudden moment; and, in just a few words, we get the material and moral beauty of a scene unmatched anywhere else on earth. That immediate impression proves to be more valuable than the eloquent memory.
The captain of the boat that had dropped them at Cincinnati and gone to St. Louis had stayed in the latter place until they were able to join and return with him; this letter bears date accordingly, "On board the Messenger again. Going from St. Louis back to Cincinnati. Friday, fifteenth April, 1842;" and its first paragraph is an outline of the movements which it afterwards describes in detail. "We remained in Cincinnati one whole day after the date of my last, and left on Wednesday morning, the 6th. We reached Louisville soon after midnight on the same night; and slept there. Next day at one o'clock we put ourselves on board another steamer, and traveled on until Sunday evening, the tenth; when we reached St. Louis at about nine o'clock. The next day we devoted to seeing the[383] city. Next day, Tuesday, the twelfth, I started off with a party of men (we were fourteen in all) to see a prairie; returned to St. Louis about noon on the thirteenth; attended a soirée and ball—not a dinner—given in my honor that night; and yesterday afternoon at four o'clock we turned our faces homewards. Thank Heaven!
The captain of the boat that had dropped them off in Cincinnati and gone to St. Louis stayed there until they could join him and head back; this letter is dated, "On board the Messenger again. Going from St. Louis back to Cincinnati. Friday, April 15, 1842;" and its first paragraph gives an overview of the events that it later describes in detail. "We stayed in Cincinnati for a whole day after my last letter and left on Wednesday morning, the 6th. We arrived in Louisville shortly after midnight that same night and spent the night there. The next day at one o'clock, we boarded another steamer and continued traveling until Sunday evening, the 10th; when we reached St. Louis around nine o'clock. The following day was spent exploring the[383] city. The next day, Tuesday the 12th, I set out with a group of men (we were fourteen in total) to see a prairie; I returned to St. Louis around noon on the 13th; attended a soirée and ball—not a dinner—held in my honor that night; and yesterday afternoon at four o'clock we headed homeward. Thank goodness!
"Cincinnati is only fifty years old, but is a very beautiful city; I think the prettiest place I have seen here, except Boston. It has risen out of the forest like an Arabian-Night city; is well laid out; ornamented in the suburbs with pretty villas; and above all, for this is a very rare feature in America, has smooth turf-plots and well-kept gardens. There happened to be a great temperance festival; and the procession mustered under, and passed, our windows early in the morning. I suppose they were twenty thousand strong, at least. Some of the banners were quaint and odd enough. The ship-carpenters, for instance, displayed on one side of their flag the good Ship Temperance in full sail; on the other, the Steamer Alcohol blowing up sky-high. The Irishmen had a portrait of Father Mathew, you may be sure. And Washington's broad lower jaw (by-the-by, Washington had not a pleasant face) figured in all parts of the ranks. In a kind of square at one outskirt of the city they divided into bodies, and were addressed by different speakers. Drier speaking I never heard. I own that I felt quite uncomfortable to think they could take the taste of it out of their mouths with nothing better than water.
Cincinnati is only fifty years old, but it's a really beautiful city; I think it's the prettiest place I've seen here, aside from Boston. It has emerged from the forest like an Arabian Nights city; it's well planned out, decorated in the suburbs with lovely villas; and above all, for this is pretty rare in America, it has smooth lawns and well-maintained gardens. There happened to be a big temperance festival, and the parade gathered under and passed by our windows early in the morning. I’d guess there were at least twenty thousand people participating. Some of the banners were quite unique and interesting. The shipbuilders, for example, showed on one side of their flag the good Ship Temperance in full sail; on the other side, the Steamer Alcohol exploding into the sky. The Irish community had a portrait of Father Mathew, of course. And Washington’s broad lower jaw (by the way, Washington didn’t have a very pleasant face) was featured throughout the crowd. They formed groups in a kind of square at one edge of the city and were addressed by different speakers. I’ve never heard drier speeches. I admit I felt quite uncomfortable thinking they could quench their thirst with nothing better than water.
"In the evening we went to a party at Judge Walker's, and were introduced to at least one hundred and fifty[384] first-rate bores, separately and singly. I was required to sit down by the greater part of them, and talk![59] In[385] the night we were serenaded (as we usually are in every place we come to), and very well serenaded, I assure you. But we were very much knocked up. I really think my face has acquired a fixed expression of sadness from the constant and unmitigated boring I endure. The LL's have carried away all my cheerfulness. There is a line in my chin (on the right side of the under lip), indelibly fixed there by the New Englander I told you of in my last. I have the print of a crow's foot on the outside of my left eye, which I attribute to the literary characters of small towns. A dimple has vanished from my cheek, which I felt myself robbed of at the time by a wise legislator. But on the other hand I am really indebted for a good broad grin to P.. E.., literary critic of Philadelphia, and sole proprietor of the English language in its grammatical and idiomatical purity; to P.. E.., with the shiny straight hair and turned-down shirt-collar, who taketh all of us English men of letters to task in print, roundly and uncompromisingly, but told me, at the same time, that I had 'awakened a new era' in his mind. . . .
"In the evening, we went to a party at Judge Walker's and were introduced to at least one hundred and fifty[384] first-rate bores, one by one. I was required to sit down with most of them and talk![59] That night, we were serenaded (as we usually are wherever we go), and I assure you, it was a very good serenade. But we were quite exhausted. I genuinely think my face has taken on a permanent sad expression from the constant and relentless boredom I endure. The literary locals have drained all my cheerfulness. There's a line on my chin (on the right side of my lower lip), which was indelibly marked by the New Englander I mentioned in my last. I have the imprint of a crow's foot at the outer corner of my left eye, which I blame on the literary figures from small towns. A dimple has disappeared from my cheek, and I felt like I was robbed of it by a savvy legislator. However, on the bright side, I owe a good wide grin to P.. E.., the literary critic from Philadelphia and the sole guardian of the English language in its grammatical and idiomatic purity; to P.. E.., with his shiny straight hair and turned-down shirt collar, who holds all of us English writers accountable in print, without reservation, but also told me that I had 'awakened a new era' in his mind. . . .
"The last 200 miles of the voyage from Cincinnati to St. Louis are upon the Mississippi, for you come down the Ohio to its mouth. It is well for society that this Mississippi, the renowned father of waters, had no[386] children who take after him. It is the beastliest river in the world." . . . (His description is in the Notes.)
"The last 200 miles of the trip from Cincinnati to St. Louis are on the Mississippi, as you come down the Ohio to its mouth. It's a good thing for society that this Mississippi, the famous father of rivers, had no[386] children who resemble him. It’s the most disgusting river in the world." . . . (His description is in the Notes)
"Conceive the pleasure of rushing down this stream by night (as we did last night) at the rate of fifteen miles an hour; striking against floating blocks of timber every instant; and dreading some infernal blow at every bump. The helmsman in these boats is in a little glass house upon the roof. In the Mississippi, another man stands in the very head of the vessel, listening and watching intently; listening, because they can tell in dark nights by the noise when any great obstruction is at hand. This man holds the rope of a large bell which hangs close to the wheel-house, and whenever he pulls it the engine is to stop directly, and not to stir until he rings again. Last night, this bell rang at least once in every five minutes; and at each alarm there was a concussion which nearly flung one out of bed. . . . While I have been writing this account, we have shot out of that hideous river, thanks be to God; never to see it again, I hope, but in a nightmare. We are now on the smooth Ohio, and the change is like the transition from pain to perfect ease.
Imagine the thrill of speeding down this river at night (like we did last night) at fifteen miles per hour; bumping into floating logs every second; and fearing a nasty jolt with every bump. The person steering the boat is in a little glass box on the roof. On the Mississippi, another guy stands right at the front of the boat, listening and watching closely; he listens because, on dark nights, he can tell by the sound when a big obstruction is near. This man pulls the rope of a large bell that hangs near the wheelhouse, and whenever he pulls it, the engine has to stop immediately and not move again until he rings it once more. Last night, that bell rang at least every five minutes; and with each ring there was a jolt that almost threw someone out of bed... While I've been writing this, we’ve finally shot out of that terrible river, thank God; I hope never to see it again except in nightmares. We are now on the smooth Ohio, and the difference feels like going from pain to perfect comfort.
"We had a very crowded levee in St. Louis. Of course the paper had an account of it. If I were to drop a letter in the street, it would be in the newspaper next day, and nobody would think its publication an outrage. The editor objected to my hair, as not curling sufficiently. He admitted an eye; but objected again to dress, as being somewhat foppish, 'and indeed perhaps rather flash.' 'But such,' he benevolently adds, 'are the differences between American and English taste—rendered more apparent, perhaps, by all the[387] other gentlemen present being dressed in black.' Oh that you could have seen the other gentlemen! . . .
"We had a really packed levee in St. Louis. Of course, the newspaper wrote about it. If I dropped a letter in the street, it would be in the paper the next day, and no one would think it was outrageous to publish it. The editor had issues with my hair, saying it didn't curl enough. He accepted one eye; but then complained about my outfit, calling it a bit showy, 'and maybe a bit flashy too.' 'But such,' he kindly adds, 'are the differences between American and English taste—made even clearer, perhaps, by the fact that all the[387]other gentlemen present were dressed in black.' Oh, if only you could have seen the other gentlemen! . . .
"A St. Louis lady complimented Kate upon her voice and manner of speaking, assuring her that she should never have suspected her of being Scotch, or even English. She was so obliging as to add that she would have taken her for an American, anywhere: which she (Kate) was no doubt aware was a very great compliment, as the Americans were admitted on all hands to have greatly refined upon the English language! I need not tell you that out of Boston and New York a nasal drawl is universal, but I may as well hint that the prevailing grammar is also more than doubtful; that the oddest vulgarisms are received idioms; that all the women who have been bred in slave-States speak more or less like negroes, from having been constantly in their childhood with black nurses; and that the most fashionable and aristocratic (these are two words in great use), instead of asking you in what place you were born, inquire where you 'hail from.' ! !
A lady from St. Louis complimented Kate on her voice and way of speaking, assuring her that she would never have guessed she was Scottish or even English. She kindly added that she would have thought Kate was American anywhere, which Kate surely knew was a huge compliment, as Americans are generally recognized for having refined the English language! I don’t need to tell you that outside of Boston and New York, a nasal drawl is common, but I might as well point out that the standard grammar is also pretty questionable; that the oddest slang is considered normal; that all the women raised in slave states speak somewhat like Black people, from having grown up with Black nurses; and that the most fashionable and elite (these terms are quite popular) don’t ask you where you were born, but where you “hail from.”
"Lord Ashburton arrived at Annapolis t'other day, after a voyage of forty odd days in heavy weather. Straightway the newspapers state, on the authority of a correspondent who 'rowed round the ship' (I leave you to fancy her condition), that America need fear no superiority from England, in respect of her wooden walls. The same correspondent is 'quite pleased' with the frank manner of the English officers; and patronizes them as being, for John Bulls, quite refined. My face, like Haji Baba's, turns upside down, and my liver is changed to water, when I come upon such things, and think who writes and who read them. . . .[388]
"Lord Ashburton arrived in Annapolis the other day after a journey of over forty days in rough weather. Immediately, the newspapers report, based on a correspondent who 'rowed around the ship' (you can imagine her condition), that America has nothing to fear from England when it comes to her wooden ships. The same correspondent is 'quite happy' with the straightforward nature of the English officers and thinks of them as being, for John Bulls, quite refined. My expression, like Haji Baba's, turns upside down, and I feel my insides turn to water when I see such things and think about who writes and who reads them. . . .[388]
"They won't let me alone about slavery. A certain judge in St. Louis went so far yesterday that I fell upon him (to the indescribable horror of the man who brought him) and told him a piece of my mind. I said that I was very averse to speaking on the subject here, and always forbore, if possible; but when he pitied our national ignorance of the truths of slavery, I must remind him that we went upon indisputable records, obtained after many years of careful investigation, and at all sorts of self-sacrifice, and that I believed we were much more competent to judge of its atrocity and horror than he who had been brought up in the midst of it. I told him that I could sympathize with men who admitted it to be a dreadful evil, but frankly confessed their inability to devise a means of getting rid of it; but that men who spoke of it as a blessing, as a matter of course, as a state of things to be desired, were out of the pale of reason; and that for them to speak of ignorance or prejudice was an absurdity too ridiculous to be combated. . . .
"They won't leave me alone about slavery. A certain judge in St. Louis went so far yesterday that I confronted him (to the indescribable horror of the person who brought him) and told him exactly what I thought. I said that I really didn’t want to talk about this subject here, and I always tried to avoid it if I could; but when he expressed pity for our national ignorance regarding the truths of slavery, I had to remind him that we relied on undeniable records, obtained after many years of careful investigation and through all sorts of self-sacrifice, and that I believed we were far more qualified to judge its atrocity and horror than he, who had been raised in the thick of it. I told him that I could empathize with those who acknowledged it as a terrible evil but honestly admitted their inability to find a solution to eliminate it; but those who talked about it as if it were a blessing, as if it were perfectly normal, as a desirable state of affairs, were completely out of touch with reality; and that for them to speak of ignorance or prejudice was an absurdity too ridiculous to be debated. . . ."
"It is not six years ago, since a slave in this very same St. Louis, being arrested (I forget for what), and knowing he had no chance of a fair trial, be his offense what it might, drew his bowie-knife and ripped the constable across the body. A scuffle ensuing, the desperate negro stabbed two others with the same weapon. The mob who gathered round (among whom were men of mark, wealth, and influence in the place) overpowered him by numbers; carried him away to a piece of open ground beyond the city; and burned him alive. This, I say, was done within six years, in broad day; in a city with its courts, lawyers, tipstaffs,[389] judges, jails, and hangman; and not a hair on the head of one of those men has been hurt to this day. And it is, believe me, it is the miserable, wretched independence in small things, the paltry republicanism which recoils from honest service to an honest man, but does not shrink from every trick, artifice, and knavery in business, that makes these slaves necessary, and will render them so, until the indignation of other countries sets them free.
"It's not been six years since a slave in this very St. Louis was arrested (I can't remember the reason), and knowing he had no chance of a fair trial, regardless of his offense, he took out his bowie knife and attacked the constable. A fight broke out, and in his desperation, he stabbed two others with the same weapon. The mob that gathered around (including some notable people of wealth and influence) overpowered him with their numbers and took him to an open area outside the city; and burned him alive. This happened, I remind you, within the last six years, in broad daylight, in a city that had its courts, lawyers, officers, judges, jails, and executioners; and not one of those men has faced any consequences to this day. And believe me, it's the miserable, pathetic independence in small matters, the petty republicanism that avoids honest work for an honest person but doesn’t hesitate to use every trick, scheme, and deception in business, that makes these slaves necessary, and will keep them that way until the outrage of other countries sets them free."
"They say the slaves are fond of their masters. Look at this pretty vignette[60] (part of the stock in trade of a newspaper), and judge how you would feel, when men, looking in your face, told you such tales with the newspaper lying on the table. In all the slave-districts, advertisements for runaways are as much matters of course as the announcement of the play for the evening with us. The poor creatures themselves fairly worship English people: they would do anything for them. They are perfectly acquainted with all that takes place in reference to emancipation; and of course their attachment to us grows out of their deep devotion to their owners. I cut this illustration out of a newspaper which had a leader in reference to the abominable and hellish doctrine of Abolition—repugnant alike to every law of God and Nature. 'I know something,' said a Dr. Bartlett (a very accomplished man), late a fellow-passenger of ours,—'I know something of their fondness[390] for their masters. I live in Kentucky; and I can assert upon my honor that, in my neighborhood, it is as common for a runaway slave, retaken, to draw his bowie-knife and rip his owner's bowels open, as it is for you to see a drunken fight in London.'
"They say that slaves are attached to their masters. Look at this nice little scene[60] (a common feature in a newspaper), and think about how you would feel if people were telling you such stories while the newspaper was right there on the table. In all the slave regions, ads for runaway slaves are everyday occurrences, just like announcing the evening's play for us. The poor individuals genuinely admire English people: they would do anything for them. They're fully aware of everything going on regarding emancipation; and of course, their loyalty to us comes from their strong devotion to their owners. I cut this example from a newspaper that had an editorial discussing the despicable and immoral idea of Abolition—contrary to every law of God and Nature. 'I know something,' said Dr. Bartlett (a very knowledgeable man) who was our fellow traveler—'I know something about their loyalty[390] to their masters. I live in Kentucky, and I can honestly say that in my area, it’s as common for a runaway slave who is caught to pull out his bowie knife and stab his owner, as it is for you to witness a drunken brawl in London.'"
"In the same situation, Saturday, Sixteenth April, 1842.
"Let me tell you, my dear Forster, before I forget it, a pretty little scene we had on board the boat between Louisville and St. Louis, as we were going to the latter place. It is not much to tell, but it was very pleasant and interesting to witness."
"Let me tell you, my dear Forster, before I forget, about a charming little scene we had on the boat between Louisville and St. Louis while we were heading to the latter. It's not a lot to share, but it was really enjoyable and interesting to see."
What follows has been printed in the Notes, and ought not, by the rule I have laid down, to be given here. But, beautiful as the printed description is, it has not profited by the alteration of some touches and the omission of others in the first fresh version of it, which, for that reason, I here preserve,—one of the most charming soul-felt pictures of character and emotion that ever warmed the heart in fact or fiction. It was, I think, Jeffrey's favorite passage in all the writings of Dickens; and certainly, if any one would learn the secret of their popularity, it is to be read in the observation and description of this little incident.
What’s printed in the Notes shouldn’t be included here according to the rule I’ve set. However, as beautiful as the printed description is, it hasn’t benefited from some edits and the removal of others in the latest version. For that reason, I’m keeping it here—it's one of the most charming and heartfelt portrayals of character and emotion that ever touched the heart, whether in real life or fiction. I believe this was Jeffrey's favorite passage from all of Dickens' works; and truly, if anyone wants to understand the secret to their popularity, it can be found in the observation and description of this little incident.
"There was a little woman on board, with a little baby; and both little woman and little child were cheerful, good-looking, bright-eyed, and fair to see. The little woman had been passing a long time with a sick mother in New York, and had left her home in St. Louis in that condition in which ladies who truly love their lords desire to be. The baby had been born in her mother's house, and she had not seen her husband[391] (to whom she was now returning) for twelve months: having left him a month or two after their marriage. Well, to be sure, there never was a little woman so full of hope, and tenderness, and love, and anxiety, as this little woman was: and there she was, all the livelong day, wondering whether 'he' would be at the wharf; and whether 'he' had got her letter; and whether, if she sent the baby on shore by somebody else, 'he' would know it, meeting it in the street: which, seeing that he had never set eyes upon it in his life, was not very likely in the abstract, but was probable enough to the young mother. She was such an artless little creature; and was in such a sunny, beaming, hopeful state; and let out all this matter, clinging close about her heart, so freely; that all the other lady passengers entered into the spirit of it as much as she: and the captain (who heard all about it from his wife) was wondrous sly, I promise you: inquiring, every time we met at table, whether she expected anybody to meet her at St. Louis, and supposing she wouldn't want to go ashore the night we reached it, and cutting many other dry jokes which convulsed all his hearers, but especially the ladies. There was one little, weazen, dried-apple old woman among them, who took occasion to doubt the constancy of husbands under such circumstances of bereavement; and there was another lady (with a lap-dog), old enough to moralize on the lightness of human affections, and yet not so old that she could help nursing the baby now and then, or laughing with the rest when the little woman called it by its father's name, and asked it all manner of fantastic questions concerning him, in the joy of her heart. It was something of a blow to the[392] little woman that when we were within twenty miles of our destination it became clearly necessary to put the baby to bed; but she got over that with the same good humor, tied a little handkerchief over her little head, and came out into the gallery with the rest. Then, such an oracle as she became in reference to the localities! and such facetiousness as was displayed by the married ladies! and such sympathy as was shown by the single ones! and such peals of laughter as the little woman herself (who would just as soon have cried) greeted every jest with! At last, there were the lights of St. Louis—and here was the wharf—and those were the steps—and the little woman, covering her face with her hands, and laughing, or seeming to laugh, more than ever, ran into her own cabin, and shut herself up tight. I have no doubt that, in the charming inconsistency of such excitement, she stopped her ears lest she should hear 'him' asking for her; but I didn't see her do it. Then a great crowd of people rushed on board, though the boat was not yet made fast, and was staggering about among the other boats to find a landing-place; and everybody looked for the husband, and nobody saw him; when all of a sudden, right in the midst of them,—God knows how she ever got there,—there was the little woman hugging with both arms round the neck of a fine, good-looking, sturdy fellow! And in a moment afterwards, there she was again, dragging him through the small door of her small cabin, to look at the baby as he lay asleep!—What a good thing it is to know that so many of us would have been quite down-hearted and sorry if that husband had failed to come!"
There was a small woman on board with a tiny baby, and both the woman and the child were cheerful, attractive, bright-eyed, and pleasant to look at. The woman had spent a long time taking care of her sick mother in New York, and had left her home in St. Louis in that state which ladies who truly love their husbands hope to be in. The baby was born at her mother’s house, and she hadn't seen her husband[391] (to whom she was now returning) for twelve months, having left him a month or two after their wedding. Indeed, there never was a little woman so full of hope, tenderness, love, and anxiety as she was: there she was all day long, wondering if 'he' would be at the dock; if 'he' had received her letter; and whether, if she sent the baby on shore with someone else, 'he' would recognize it when they crossed paths in the street: which, considering he had never seen it before, was unlikely in the abstract but seemed quite possible to the young mother. She was such an innocent little thing, filled with sunshine, joy, and hope; and she shared all these thoughts that clung to her heart so openly that all the other lady passengers joined in her excitement: and the captain (who heard all about it from his wife) was quite mischievous, I assure you, asking each time we met at the table if she was expecting anyone to meet her in St. Louis, and guessing she wouldn't want to go ashore the night we arrived, along with many other dry jokes that had everyone in stitches, especially the ladies. There was one small, haggard, old woman among them who expressed doubt about husbands staying faithful under such circumstances of separation; and there was another lady (with a lap-dog), old enough to reflect on the fickleness of human affections, yet not so old that she couldn't help nursing the baby occasionally or laughing along with the others when the little woman called it by its father's name and asked it all sorts of whimsical questions about him, in her joyful state. It was a bit deflating for the[392] little woman that when we were within twenty miles of our destination it was clearly time to put the baby to bed; but she overcame that with the same good humor, tied a little handkerchief over her head, and came out to the gallery with everyone else. Then, she became such an expert on the local sights! And how funny the married ladies were! And how supportive the single ones were! And how the little woman herself (who would have preferred to cry) greeted every joke with peals of laughter! Finally, there were the lights of St. Louis—and here was the dock—and those were the steps—and the little woman, covering her face with her hands and laughing, or seeming to laugh, more than ever, ran into her own cabin and shut herself in tight. I have no doubt that, in the delightful inconsistency of such excitement, she covered her ears to avoid hearing 'him' calling for her; but I didn't see her do it. Then a huge crowd of people surged on board, even though the boat hadn’t tied up yet and was lurching among the other boats looking for a place to dock; and everyone was searching for the husband, but nobody saw him; when suddenly, right in the middle of them,—God knows how she got there,—there was the little woman hugging a strong, good-looking guy around the neck! Moments later, she was dragging him through the small door of her tiny cabin to see the baby sleeping!—What a wonderful thing it is to know that so many of us would have felt heartbroken and disappointed if that husband had not shown up!
He then resumes; but in what follows nothing is repeated[393] that will be found in his printed description of the jaunt to the looking-glass prairie:
He continues; however, in what comes next, nothing is repeated[393] that can be found in his published account of the trip to the looking-glass prairie:
"But about the prairie—it is not, I must confess, so good in its way as this; but I'll tell you all about that too, and leave you to judge for yourself. Tuesday the 12th was the day fixed; and we were to start at five in the morning—sharp. I turned out at four; shaved and dressed; got some bread and milk; and, throwing up the window, looked down into the street. Deuce a coach was there, nor did anybody seem to be stirring in the house. I waited until half-past five; but no preparations being visible even then, I left Mr. Q. to look out, and lay down upon the bed again. There I slept until nearly seven, when I was called. . . . Exclusive of Mr. Q. and myself, there were twelve of my committee in the party: all lawyers except one. He was an intelligent, mild, well-informed gentleman of my own age,—the Unitarian minister of the place. With him, and two other companions, I got into the first coach. . . .
"But about the prairie—it’s not, I have to admit, quite as nice as this; but I’ll share all that with you and let you decide for yourself. Tuesday the 12th was our set date, and we were supposed to leave at five in the morning—sharp. I got up at four, shaved and got dressed, grabbed some bread and milk, and when I opened the window, I looked down into the street. Not a single cab was there, and it didn’t seem like anyone was moving around in the house either. I waited until half-past five, but since I still didn’t see any signs of activity, I left Mr. Q. to keep an eye out and went back to bed. I slept there until almost seven, when I was called. . . . Besides Mr. Q. and me, there were twelve people from my committee in the group: all lawyers except for one. He was a smart, gentle, well-informed guy around my age—the Unitarian minister of the town. With him and two other friends, I got into the first cab. . . .
"We halted at so good an inn at Lebanon that we resolved to return there at night, if possible. One would scarcely find a better village alehouse of a homely kind in England. During our halt I walked into the village, and met a dwelling-house coming down-hill at a good round trot, drawn by some twenty oxen! We resumed our journey as soon as possible, and got upon the looking-glass prairie at sunset. We halted near a solitary log house for the sake of its water; unpacked the baskets; formed an encampment with the carriages; and dined.
"We stopped at such a nice inn in Lebanon that we decided to come back there at night, if we could. You would hardly find a better cozy village pub anywhere in England. While we were resting, I walked into the village and saw a dwelling-house being pulled down the hill at a good speed by about twenty oxen! We continued our journey as soon as we could and reached the looking-glass prairie at sunset. We stopped near a lonely log cabin because of its water source; unpacked the baskets; set up camp with the carriages; and had dinner."
"Now, a prairie is undoubtedly worth seeing—but[394] more, that one may say one has seen it, than for any sublimity it possesses in itself. Like most things, great or small, in this country, you hear of it with considerable exaggerations. Basil Hall was really quite right in depreciating the general character of the scenery. The widely-famed Far West is not to be compared with even the tamest portions of Scotland or Wales. You stand upon the prairie, and see the unbroken horizon all round you. You are on a great plain, which is like a sea without water. I am exceedingly fond of wild and lonely scenery, and believe that I have the faculty of being as much impressed by it as any man living. But the prairie fell, by far, short of my preconceived idea. I felt no such emotions as I do in crossing Salisbury Plain. The excessive flatness of the scene makes it dreary, but tame. Grandeur is certainly not its characteristic. I retired from the rest of the party, to understand my own feelings the better; and looked all round, again and again. It was fine. It was worth the ride. The sun was going down, very red and bright; and the prospect looked like that ruddy sketch of Catlin's, which attracted our attention (you remember?); except that there was not so much ground as he represents, between the spectator and the horizon. But to say (as the fashion is here) that the sight is a landmark in one's existence, and awakens a new set of sensations, is sheer gammon. I would say to every man who can't see a prairie—go to Salisbury Plain, Marlborough Downs, or any of the broad, high, open lands near the sea. Many of them are fully as impressive, and Salisbury Plain is decidedly more so.
"Now, a prairie is definitely worth seeing—but[394] more for the sake of saying you’ve seen it than for any inherent beauty it has. Like many things, big or small, in this country, you hear about it with a lot of exaggeration. Basil Hall was spot on in downplaying the overall quality of the scenery. The famous Far West doesn’t compare to even the most ordinary parts of Scotland or Wales. You stand on the prairie and see the endless horizon all around you. You’re on a massive plain that feels like a sea without water. I really love wild and desolate landscapes, and I think I can appreciate them as much as anyone else. But the prairie fell way short of my expectations. I didn’t feel anything like what I do when I cross Salisbury Plain. The extreme flatness of the landscape makes it dull, but not wild. Grandeur is definitely not its defining feature. I stepped away from the rest of the group to better understand my feelings and looked around again and again. It was beautiful. It was worth the journey. The sun was setting, very bright and red; and the view resembled that striking painting by Catlin that caught our attention (remember?); except there wasn’t as much ground as he depicts between the viewer and the horizon. But to claim (as people do here) that the sight is a pivotal moment in your life and sparks a whole new set of feelings is just nonsense. I would tell anyone who can’t see a prairie—go to Salisbury Plain, Marlborough Downs, or any of the wide, high, open lands near the sea. Many of them are just as impressive, and Salisbury Plain is definitely more so."
"We had brought roast fowls, buffalo's tongue, ham,[395] bread, cheese, butter, biscuits, sherry, champagne, lemons and sugar for punch, and abundance of ice. It was a delicious meal; and, as they were most anxious that I should be pleased, I warmed myself into a state of surpassing jollity; proposed toasts from the coach-box (which was the chair); ate and drank with the best; and made, I believe, an excellent companion to a very friendly companionable party. In an hour or so we packed up, and drove back to the inn at Lebanon. While supper was preparing, I took a pleasant walk with my Unitarian friend; and when it was over (we drank nothing with it but tea and coffee) we went to bed. The clergyman and I had an exquisitely clean little chamber of our own; and the rest of the party were quartered overhead. . . .
"We brought roast chickens, buffalo tongue, ham,[395] bread, cheese, butter, biscuits, sherry, champagne, lemons and sugar for punch, and plenty of ice. It was a delicious meal; and since they were really eager to make me happy, I got into a wonderfully cheerful mood; proposed toasts from the front seat (which was the chair); ate and drank with the best; and I think I made a great companion to a very friendly and sociable group. After about an hour, we packed up and drove back to the inn in Lebanon. While supper was being prepared, I took a nice walk with my Unitarian friend, and when it was over (we only drank tea and coffee with it), we went to bed. The clergyman and I had a beautifully clean little room of our own, while the rest of the group was staying upstairs. . . .
"We got back to St. Louis soon after twelve at noon; and I rested during the remainder of the day. The soirée came off at night, in a very good ball-room at our inn,—the Planter's House. The whole of the guests were introduced to us, singly. We were glad enough, you may believe, to come away at midnight; and were very tired. Yesterday, I wore a blouse. To-day, a fur coat. Trying changes!
"We returned to St. Louis just after noon, and I took it easy for the rest of the day. The party took place that night in a nice ballroom at our hotel—the Planter's House. All the guests were introduced to us one by one. We were definitely ready to leave by midnight, and we were exhausted. Yesterday, I wore a blouse. Today, a fur coat. Trying out some new looks!"
"In the Same Boat"
"Sunday, Sixteenth April, 1842.
"The inns in these outlandish corners of the world would astonish you by their goodness. The Planter's House is as large as the Middlesex Hospital, and built very much on our hospital plan, with long wards abundantly ventilated, and plain whitewashed walls. They had a famous notion of sending up at breakfast-time large glasses of new milk with blocks of ice in them as[396] clear as crystal. Our table was abundantly supplied indeed at every meal. One day when Kate and I were dining alone together, in our own room, we counted sixteen dishes on the table at the same time.
"The inns in these remote areas of the world would surprise you with their quality. The Planter's House is as big as the Middlesex Hospital, designed similarly to our hospital layout, with long wards that are well-ventilated and plain whitewashed walls. They had an interesting idea of serving large glasses of fresh milk with ice cubes in them at breakfast, as clear as crystal. Our table was definitely well-stocked at every meal. One day, when Kate and I were having dinner alone in our room, we counted sixteen dishes on the table at once."
"The society is pretty rough, and intolerably conceited. All the inhabitants are young. I didn't see one gray head in St. Louis. There is an island close by, called Bloody Island. It is the dueling-ground of St. Louis; and is so called from the last fatal duel which was fought there. It was a pistol duel, breast to breast, and both parties fell dead at the same time. One of our prairie party (a young man) had acted as second there, in several encounters. The last occasion was a duel with rifles, at forty paces; and coming home he told us how he had bought his man a coat of green linen to fight in, woolen being usually fatal to rifle-wounds. Prairie is variously called (on the refinement principle, I suppose) Paraarer; parearer; and paroarer. I am afraid, my dear fellow, you will have had great difficulty in reading all the foregoing text. I have written it, very laboriously, on my knee; and the engine throbs and starts as if the boat were possessed with a devil.
The society is pretty rough and incredibly arrogant. All the inhabitants are young. I didn't see a single gray hair in St. Louis. There’s an island nearby called Bloody Island. It’s the dueling ground of St. Louis, named after the last deadly duel fought there. It was a pistol duel, face to face, and both combatants fell dead at the same moment. One of our group from the prairie, a young man, had been a second in several duels there. The last one was a rifle duel at forty paces; on the way back, he told us how he bought his opponent a green linen coat to fight in, since wool is usually deadly for rifle wounds. Prairie is referred to in various ways (I guess for the sake of refinement): Paraarer, parearer, and paroarer. I'm afraid, my dear friend, you’re going to have a hard time reading all of this. I’ve written it very laboriously on my lap, and the engine is thumping and shaking as if the boat was possessed by a devil.
Sandusky,
"Sunday, Twenty-fourth April, 1842.
"We went ashore at Louisville this night week, where I left off, two lines above; and slept at the hotel, in which we had put up before. The Messenger being abominably slow, we got our luggage out next morning, and started on again at eleven o'clock in the Benjamin Franklin mail-boat: a splendid vessel, with a cabin more than two hundred feet long, and little state-rooms[397] affording proportionate conveniences. She got in at Cincinnati by one o'clock next morning, when we landed in the dark and went back to our old hotel. As we made our way on foot over the broken pavement, Anne measured her length upon the ground, but didn't hurt herself. I say nothing of Kate's troubles—but you recollect her propensity? She falls into, or out of, every coach or boat we enter; scrapes the skin off her legs; brings great sores and swellings on her feet; chips large fragments out of her ankle-bones; and makes herself blue with bruises. She really has, however, since we got over the first trial of being among circumstances so new and so fatiguing, made a most admirable traveler in every respect. She has never screamed or expressed alarm under circumstances that would have fully justified her in doing so, even in my eyes; has never given way to despondency or fatigue, though we have now been traveling incessantly, through a very rough country, for more than a month, and have been at times, as you may readily suppose, most thoroughly tired; has always accommodated herself, well and cheerfully, to everything; and has pleased me very much, and proved herself perfectly game.
"We went ashore in Louisville last week, where I left off, two lines above, and stayed at the same hotel we had been to before. The Messenger was painfully slow, so we got our luggage out the next morning and set off again at eleven o'clock on the Benjamin Franklin mail boat: a magnificent vessel, with a cabin over two hundred feet long and small state-rooms[397] providing decent amenities. We arrived in Cincinnati by one o'clock the next morning, landing in the dark and returning to our old hotel. As we walked over the broken pavement, Anne fell down but didn't hurt herself. I won't mention Kate's troubles—but you remember her habits, right? She trips into or out of every coach or boat we board, scrapes her legs, ends up with big sores and swelling on her feet, chips pieces out of her ankle-bones, and gets covered in bruises. However, since we got over the initial challenge of being in such unfamiliar and exhausting circumstances, she has become a most admirable traveler in every way. She has never screamed or shown alarm in situations that would have completely justified it, even in my eyes; has never given in to despair or fatigue, even though we’ve been traveling nonstop through a pretty rough area for over a month and have been, as you can imagine, pretty worn out at times; has always adapted well and cheerfully to everything; and has impressed me a lot and shown herself to be incredibly resilient."
"We remained at Cincinnati all Tuesday the nineteenth, and all that night. At eight o'clock on Wednesday morning the twentieth, we left in the mail-stage for Columbus: Anne, Kate, and Mr. Q. inside; I on the box. The distance is a hundred and twenty miles; the road macadamized; and, for an American road, very good. We were three-and-twenty hours performing the journey. We traveled all night; reached Columbus at seven in the morning; breakfasted; and[398] went to bed until dinner-time. At night we held a levee for half an hour, and the people poured in as they always do: each gentleman with a lady on each arm, exactly like the Chorus to God Save the Queen. I wish you could see them, that you might know what a splendid comparison this is. They wear their clothes precisely as the chorus people do; and stand—supposing Kate and me to be in the centre of the stage, with our backs to the footlights—just as the company would, on the first night of the season. They shake hands exactly after the manner of the guests at a ball at the Adelphi or the Haymarket; receive any facetiousness on my part as if there were a stage direction 'all laugh;' and have rather more difficulty in 'getting off' than the last gentlemen, in white pantaloons, polished boots, and berlins, usually display, under the most trying circumstances.
We stayed in Cincinnati all day on Tuesday the 19th and through the night. At 8 a.m. on Wednesday the 20th, we took the mail stage to Columbus: Anne, Kate, and Mr. Q. were inside; I sat on the box. The distance was 120 miles; the road was paved and, for an American road, pretty good. It took us 23 hours to complete the journey. We traveled all night, arrived in Columbus at 7 in the morning, had breakfast, and[398]went to bed until dinner time. In the evening, we hosted a gathering for half an hour, and the crowd came in as they always do: each gentleman with a lady on each arm, just like the chorus of "God Save the Queen." I wish you could see them; you'd understand how accurate that comparison is. They wear their clothes just like the chorus members do and stand—if Kate and I were in the center of the stage with our backs to the audience—exactly like the company would on opening night. They shake hands just like guests at a ball at the Adelphi or the Haymarket; they respond to my jokes as if there were a stage direction saying 'everyone laughs;' and they have a bit more trouble 'getting off' than the last gentlemen in white trousers, shiny boots, and capes usually show, even under the most challenging situations.
"Next morning, that is to say, on Friday, the 22d, at seven o'clock exactly, we resumed our journey. The stage from Columbus to this place only running thrice a week, and not on that day, I bargained for an 'exclusive extra' with four horses; for which I paid forty dollars, or eight pounds English: the horses changing, as they would if it were the regular stage. To insure our getting on properly, the proprietors sent an agent on the box; and, with no other company but him and a hamper full of eatables and drinkables, we went upon our way. It is impossible to convey an adequate idea to you of the kind of road over which we traveled. I can only say that it was, at the best, but a track through the wild forest, and among the swamps, bogs, and morasses of the withered bush. A great portion of it was[399] what is called a 'corduroy road:' which is made by throwing round logs or whole trees into a swamp, and leaving them to settle there. Good Heaven! if you only felt one of the least of the jolts with which the coach falls from log to log! It is like nothing but going up a steep flight of stairs in an omnibus. Now the coach flung us in a heap on its floor, and now crushed our heads against its roof. Now one side of it was deep in the mire, and we were holding on to the other. Now it was lying on the horses' tails, and now again upon its back. But it never, never was in any position, attitude, or kind of motion, to which we are accustomed in coaches; or made the smallest approach to our experience of the proceedings of any sort of vehicle that goes on wheels. Still, the day was beautiful, the air delicious, and we were alone; with no tobacco-spittle, or eternal prosy conversation about dollars and politics (the only two subjects they ever converse about, or can converse upon), to bore us. We really enjoyed it; made a joke of the being knocked about; and were quite merry. At two o'clock we stopped in the wood to open our hamper and dine; and we drank to our darlings and all friends at home. Then we started again and went on until ten o'clock at night: when we reached a place called Lower Sandusky, sixty-two miles from our starting-point. The last three hours of the journey were not very pleasant; for it lightened—awfully: every flash very vivid, very blue, and very long; and, the wood being so dense that the branches on either side of the track rattled and broke against the coach, it was rather a dangerous neighborhood for a thunder-storm.[400]
The next morning, on Friday the 22nd, at precisely seven o'clock, we continued our journey. Since the stage from Columbus to this location only runs three times a week and not on that day, I arranged for an 'exclusive extra' with four horses, paying forty dollars, or eight British pounds. The horses changed as they would for the regular stage. To ensure everything went smoothly, the owners sent an agent on the box seat, and with just him and a basket full of food and drinks, we set off. It’s hard to fully describe the kind of road we traveled. At best, it was just a track through the wild forest and across swamps, bogs, and marshy areas of the dry brush. A large part of it was what’s known as a 'corduroy road,' made by laying down logs or entire trees in a swamp and letting them settle. Goodness! If only you could feel even one of the jolts we experienced as the coach bounced from log to log! It was like climbing a steep flight of stairs in a bus. At times, the coach would throw us onto the floor, and at other moments, it would bang our heads against the roof. Sometimes one side sank deep into the mud while we clung to the other side. Other times, it was tilted on the horses' tails or lying on its back. But it was never, ever in any position or movement that we recognized from usual coaches, nor did it resemble the experience of any vehicle with wheels. Still, the day was beautiful, the air refreshing, and we were alone; free from tobacco spit and the boring, endless discussions about dollars and politics (the only two topics anyone ever talks about). We genuinely enjoyed it, joked about being tossed around, and were quite cheerful. At two o'clock, we stopped in the woods to open our basket and have lunch; we toasted to our loved ones and friends back home. Then we set off again and continued until ten o'clock at night when we arrived at a place called Lower Sandusky, sixty-two miles from where we began. The last three hours of the journey were pretty unpleasant, as it started to thunder—terribly. Each flash was very bright, very blue, and lasted a long time; with the woods so dense that the branches on either side of the track rattled and hit the coach, it was quite a dangerous area for a thunderstorm.[400]
"The inn at which we halted was a rough log house. The people were all abed, and we had to knock them up. We had the queerest sleeping-room, with two doors, one opposite the other; both opening directly on the wild black country, and neither having any lock or bolt. The effect of these opposite doors was, that one was always blowing the other open: an ingenuity in the art of building, which I don't remember to have met with before. You should have seen me, in my shirt, blockading them with portmanteaus, and desperately endeavoring to make the room tidy! But the blockading was really needful, for in my dressing-case I have about 250l. in gold; and for the amount of the middle figure in that scarce metal there are not a few men in the West who would murder their fathers. Apropos of this golden store, consider at your leisure the strange state of things in this country. It has no money; really no money. The bank-paper won't pass; the newspapers are full of advertisements from tradesmen who sell by barter; and American gold is not to be had, or purchased. I bought sovereigns, English sovereigns, at first; but as I could get none of them at Cincinnati, to this day, I have had to purchase French gold; 20-franc pieces; with which I am traveling as if I were in Paris!
The inn where we stopped was a rough log cabin. Everyone was already in bed, so we had to wake them up. We had the strangest sleeping room, with two doors, one directly across from the other; both opening right into the wild, dark landscape, and neither had a lock or bolt. The way these opposite doors worked meant that one would always blow the other open: a unique approach to building that I don’t think I’ve come across before. You should have seen me, in my shirt, blocking them with suitcases, desperately trying to tidy up the room! But blocking them was really necessary because I have about £250 in gold in my dressing case; for that amount of money in that rare metal, there are definitely some men in the West who would kill their own fathers. Speaking of this stash of gold, think about the strange situation in this country. It has no money; really, no money. The paper currency isn't accepted; the newspapers are full of ads from traders who are selling items through barter; and American gold is unavailable, or can't be bought. I initially bought British sovereigns, but since I couldn’t get any in Cincinnati, I’ve had to buy French gold coins—20-franc pieces—traveling around as if I were in Paris!
"But let's go back to Lower Sandusky. Mr. Q. went to bed up in the roof of the log house somewhere, but was so beset by bugs that he got up after an hour and lay in the coach, . . . where he was obliged to wait till breakfast-time. We breakfasted, driver and all, in the one common room. It was papered with newspapers, and was as rough a place as need be. At half-past seven we started again, and we reached Sandusky[401] at six o'clock yesterday afternoon. It is on Lake Erie, twenty-four hours' journey by steamboat from Buffalo. We found no boat here, nor has there been one, since. We are waiting, with every thing packed up, ready to start on the shortest notice; and are anxiously looking out for smoke in the distance.
"But let's return to Lower Sandusky. Mr. Q. went to bed in the loft of the log cabin, but he was so bothered by bugs that he got up after an hour and laid on the couch, . . . where he had to wait until breakfast. We all had breakfast together in the communal room. The walls were covered in newspapers, and it was as rough a place as you could imagine. At 7:30, we set off again, and we arrived in Sandusky[401] at six o'clock yesterday evening. It’s located on Lake Erie, a twenty-four-hour boat ride from Buffalo. We haven’t found any boats here, nor has there been one since. We're waiting, with everything packed and ready to go at a moment's notice, and we're anxiously looking for smoke in the distance."
"There was an old gentleman in the log inn at Lower Sandusky who treats with the Indians on the part of the American government, and has just concluded a treaty with the Wyandot Indians at that place to remove next year to some land provided for them west of the Mississippi, a little way beyond St. Louis. He described his negotiation to me, and their reluctance to go, exceedingly well. They are a fine people, but degraded and broken down. If you could see any of their men and women on a race-course in England, you would not know them from gipsies.
There was an old man at the log inn in Lower Sandusky who negotiates with the Indians on behalf of the American government and has just finished a treaty with the Wyandot Indians there to move next year to some land set aside for them west of the Mississippi, just a bit beyond St. Louis. He explained his negotiation to me, and their reluctance to leave, very well. They are a great people, but they’ve been beaten down and are struggling. If you saw any of their men or women at a racetrack in England, you wouldn't be able to tell them apart from gypsies.
"We are in a small house here, but a very comfortable one, and the people are exceedingly obliging. Their demeanor in these country parts is invariably morose, sullen, clownish, and repulsive. I should think there is not, on the face of the earth, a people so entirely destitute of humor, vivacity, or the capacity of enjoyment. It is most remarkable. I am quite serious when I say that I have not heard a hearty laugh these six weeks, except my own; nor have I seen a merry face on any shoulders but a black man's. Lounging listlessly about; idling in bar-rooms; smoking; spitting; and lolling on the pavement in rocking-chairs, outside the shop-doors; are the only recreations. I don't think the national shrewdness extends beyond the Yankees; that is, the Eastern men. The rest are heavy, dull,[402] and ignorant. Our landlord here is from the East. He is a handsome, obliging, civil fellow. He comes into the room with his hat on; spits in the fireplace as he talks; sits down on the sofa with his hat on; pulls out his newspaper, and reads; but to all this I am accustomed. He is anxious to please—and that is enough.
"We're in a small house here, but it's very comfortable, and the people are super friendly. Their attitude in these rural areas is usually gloomy, sullen, awkward, and off-putting. I honestly think there’s no one on this planet as completely lacking in humor, liveliness, or the ability to enjoy life. It’s quite surprising. I’m serious when I say that I haven’t heard a genuine laugh in six weeks, except for my own; nor have I seen a happy face on anyone except for a Black man. They just lounge around aimlessly; hanging out in bars; smoking; spitting; and slouching in rocking chairs outside shop doors are their only pastimes. I don’t believe the national cleverness goes beyond the Yankees; that is, the Eastern folks. The rest are heavy, dull, and ignorant. Our landlord here is from the East. He’s a good-looking, helpful, polite guy. He walks into the room with his hat on; spits in the fireplace while he talks; sits down on the sofa with his hat still on; pulls out his newspaper and reads; but I’m used to all this. He’s eager to please—and that’s all that matters."
"We are wishing very much for a boat; for we hope to find our letters at Buffalo. It is half-past one; and, as there is no boat in sight, we are fain (sorely against our wills) to order an early dinner.
"We really want a boat because we hope to find our letters in Buffalo. It's one-thirty, and since there’s no boat in sight, we reluctantly have to order an early dinner."
"I don't know at what length I might have written you from Sandusky, my beloved friend, if a steamer had not come in sight just as I finished the last unintelligible sheet! (oh! the ink in these parts!): whereupon I was obliged to pack up bag and baggage, to swallow a hasty apology for a dinner, and to hurry my train on board with all the speed I might. She was a fine steamship, four hundred tons burden, name the Constitution, had very few passengers on board, and had bountiful and handsome accommodation. It's all very fine talking about Lake Erie, but it won't do for persons who are liable to sea-sickness. We were all sick. It's almost as bad in that respect as the Atlantic. The waves are very short, and horribly constant. We reached Buffalo at six this morning; went ashore to breakfast; sent to the post-office forthwith; and received—oh![403] who or what can say with how much pleasure and what unspeakable delight!—our English letters!
"I don't know how much I might have written to you from Sandusky, my dear friend, if a steamer hadn't appeared just as I finished the last confusing page! (Oh, the ink in this place!): so I had to pack up everything, take a quick apology for dinner, and rush to get my train on board as quickly as I could. It was a great steamship, four hundred tons, named the Constitution, with very few passengers and plenty of nice accommodations. Everyone talks about Lake Erie, but it's not great for people who get seasick. We were all sick. It's almost just as bad as the Atlantic in that way. The waves are short and incredibly constant. We arrived in Buffalo at six this morning; went ashore for breakfast; sent a letter to the post office right away; and received—oh![403] who can express just how much joy and delight we felt!—our English letters!"
"We lay all Sunday night at a town (and a beautiful town too) called Cleveland; on Lake Erie. The people poured on board, in crowds, by six on Monday morning, to see me; and a party of 'gentlemen' actually planted themselves before our little cabin, and stared in at the door and windows while I was washing, and Kate lay in bed. I was so incensed at this, and at a certain newspaper published in that town which I had accidentally seen in Sandusky (advocating war with England to the death, saying that Britain must be 'whipped again,' and promising all true Americans that within two years they should sing Yankee Doodle in Hyde Park and Hail Columbia in the courts of Westminster), that when the mayor came on board to present himself to me, according to custom, I refused to see him, and bade Mr. Q. tell him why and wherefore. His honor took it very coolly, and retired to the top of the wharf, with a big stick and a whittling knife, with which he worked so lustily (staring at the closed door of our cabin all the time) that long before the boat left, the big stick was no bigger than a cribbage-peg!
"We spent all Sunday night in a town (a beautiful town too) called Cleveland, on Lake Erie. By six on Monday morning, crowds of people rushed on board to see me; and a group of 'gentlemen' actually positioned themselves in front of our small cabin, staring in through the door and windows while I was washing, and Kate was still in bed. I was so furious about this, and about a particular newspaper published in that town which I had accidentally seen in Sandusky (calling for war with England to the death, saying that Britain must be 'whipped again,' and assuring all true Americans that within two years they would be singing Yankee Doodle in Hyde Park and Hail Columbia in the courts of Westminster), that when the mayor came on board to introduce himself to me, as was customary, I refused to see him and instructed Mr. Q. to explain my reasons. The mayor took it very calmly and went to the top of the wharf, with a big stick and a whittling knife, which he whittled away at so vigorously (while staring at the closed door of our cabin the whole time) that long before the boat left, the big stick was no thicker than a cribbage peg!
"I never in my life was in such a state of excitement as coming from Buffalo here, this morning. You come by railroad, and are nigh two hours upon the way. I looked out for the spray, and listened for the roar, as far beyond the bounds of possibility as though, landing in Liverpool, I were to listen for the music of your pleasant voice in Lincoln's Inn Fields. At last,[404] when the train stopped, I saw two great white clouds rising up from the depths of the earth,—nothing more. They rose up slowly, gently, majestically, into the air. I dragged Kate down a deep and slippery path leading to the ferry-boat; bullied Anne for not coming fast enough; perspired at every pore; and felt, it is impossible to say how, as the sound grew louder and louder in my ears, and yet nothing could be seen for the mist.
"I’ve never been as excited in my life as I was traveling from Buffalo here this morning. The train ride took almost two hours. I was looking for the mist and listening for the roar, as impossible as it would be to hear your lovely voice in Lincoln's Inn Fields when landing in Liverpool. Finally, [404] when the train stopped, I saw two big white clouds rising up from the ground—nothing more. They lifted slowly, gently, majestically into the air. I pulled Kate down a steep and slippery path to the ferry boat; urged Anne to hurry up; was sweating everywhere; and felt, I can't quite describe how, as the sound grew louder and louder in my ears, even though I couldn't see anything through the mist."
"There were two English officers with us (ah! what gentlemen, what noblemen of nature they seemed), and they hurried off with me; leaving Kate and Anne on a crag of ice; and clambered after me over the rocks at the foot of the small Fall, while the ferryman was getting the boat ready. I was not disappointed—but I could make out nothing. In an instant I was blinded by the spray, and wet to the skin. I saw the water tearing madly down from some immense height, but could get no idea of shape, or situation, or anything but vague immensity. But when we were seated in the boat, and crossing at the very foot of the cataract—then I began to feel what it was. Directly I had changed my clothes at the inn I went out again, taking Kate with me, and hurried to the Horse-shoe Fall. I went down alone, into the very basin. It would be hard for a man to stand nearer God than he does there. There was a bright rainbow at my feet; and from that I looked up to—great Heaven! to what a fall of bright green water! The broad, deep, mighty stream seems to die in the act of falling; and from its unfathomable grave arises that tremendous ghost of spray and mist which is never laid, and has been haunting this place[405] with the same dread solemnity—perhaps from the creation of the world.
There were two English officers with us (ah! what gentlemen, what noblemen of nature they seemed), and they hurried off with me, leaving Kate and Anne on a chunk of ice. They climbed after me over the rocks at the base of the small waterfall while the ferryman was getting the boat ready. I was not disappointed—but I couldn’t make out anything. In an instant, I was blindsided by the spray and soaked to the skin. I saw the water rushing down madly from some immense height, but I couldn't grasp its shape, location, or anything other than a vague sense of its vastness. But once we were seated in the boat, crossing right at the base of the waterfall—that's when I started to understand what it was. As soon as I changed my clothes at the inn, I went out again, taking Kate with me, and hurried to the Horseshoe Falls. I went down alone into the very basin. It would be hard for a person to stand closer to God than there. There was a bright rainbow at my feet; and from there, I looked up to—great Heaven! to what an incredible cascade of bright green water! The broad, deep, powerful stream seems to die in the act of falling, and from its unfathomable grave rises that tremendous ghost of spray and mist that never settles, haunting this place[405] with the same dread solemnity—perhaps since the creation of the world.
"We purpose remaining here a week. In my next I will try to give you some idea of my impressions, and to tell you how they change with every day. At present it is impossible. I can only say that the first effect of this tremendous spectacle on me was peace of mind—tranquillity—great thoughts of eternal rest and happiness—nothing of terror. I can shudder at the recollection of Glencoe (dear friend, with Heaven's leave we must see Glencoe together), but whenever I think of Niagara I shall think of its beauty.
"We plan to stay here for a week. In my next update, I'll try to share my impressions and how they change each day. Right now, that's impossible. All I can say is that the first effect of this incredible sight on me was peace of mind—calmness—thoughts of eternal rest and happiness—nothing terrifying. I can shudder at the memory of Glencoe (my dear friend, with Heaven's permission we have to see Glencoe together), but whenever I think of Niagara, I'll think of its beauty."
"If you could hear the roar that is in my ears as I write this. Both Falls are under our windows. From our sitting-room and bedroom we look down straight upon them. There is not a soul in the house but ourselves. What would I give if you and Mac were here to share the sensations of this time! I was going to add, what would I give if the dear girl whose ashes lie in Kensal Green had lived to come so far along with us—but she has been here many times, I doubt not, since her sweet face faded from my earthly sight.
"If you could hear the roar in my ears as I write this. Both Falls are right outside our windows. From our living room and bedroom, we look directly down at them. There's no one else in the house but us. What I would give for you and Mac to be here to share this moment! I almost added, what I would give if the dear girl whose ashes rest in Kensal Green had lived to be here with us—but I believe she has visited us many times since her sweet face disappeared from my view."
"One word on the precious letters before I close. You are right, my dear fellow, about the papers; and you are right (I grieve to say) about the people. Am I right? quoth the conjurer. Yes! from gallery, pit, and boxes. I did let out those things, at first, against my will, but when I come to tell you all—well; only wait—only wait—till the end of July. I say no more.
"Just a word about the valuable letters before I wrap up. You’re correct, my dear friend, about the documents; and you’re right (which pains me to admit) about the people. Am I right? asked the magician. Yes! came the response from the audience. I did reveal those things, at first, against my will, but when I finally share everything with you—well; just wait—just wait—until the end of July. I’ll say no more."
"I do perceive a perplexingly divided and subdivided duty, in the matter of the book of travels. Oh![406] the sublimated essence of comicality that I could distil, from the materials I have! . . . You are a part, and an essential part, of our home, dear friend, and I exhaust my imagination in picturing the circumstances under which I shall surprise you by walking into 58, Lincoln's Inn Fields. We are truly grateful to God for the health and happiness of our inexpressibly dear children and all our friends. But one letter more—only one. . . . I don't seem to have been half affectionate enough, but there are thoughts, you know, that lie too deep for words."
"I see a confusingly divided and complicated duty when it comes to the travel book. Oh![406] the pure essence of humor I could create from the materials I have! ... You are a part, an essential part, of our home, dear friend, and I run out of ideas picturing the moment I’ll surprise you by walking into 58, Lincoln's Inn Fields. We are truly thankful to God for the health and happiness of our incredibly dear children and all our friends. But just one more letter—only one... I don’t feel like I’ve been affectionate enough, but there are, you know, thoughts that run too deep for words."
CHAPTER XXIV.
NIAGARA AND MONTREAL.
1842.
My friend was better than his word, and two more letters reached me before his return. The opening of the first was written from Niagara on the 3d, and its close from Montreal on the 12th, of May; from which latter city also, on the 26th of that month, the last of all was written.
My friend kept his promise and sent me two more letters before he came back. The first one was written from Niagara on May 3rd, and he finished it in Montreal on the 12th. He sent the final letter from that city as well, on the 26th of the same month.
Much of the first of these letters had reference to the international copyright agitation, and gave strong expression to the indignation awakened in him (nor less in some of the best men of America) by the adoption, at a public meeting in Boston itself, of a memorial against any change of the law, in the course of which it was stated that, if English authors were invested with any control over the republication of their own books, it would be no longer possible for American editors to[408] alter and adapt them to the American taste. This deliberate declaration, however, unsparing as Dickens's anger at it was, in effect vanquished him. He saw the hopelessness of pursuing further any present effort to bring about the change desired; and he took the determination not only to drop any allusion to it in his proposed book, but to try what effect might be produced, when he should again be in England, by a league of English authors to suspend further intercourse with American publishers while the law should remain as it is. On his return he made accordingly a public appeal to this effect, stating his own intention for the future to forego all profit derivable from the authorized transmission of early proofs across the Atlantic; but his hopes in this particular also were doomed to disappointment. I now leave the subject, quoting only from his present letter the general remarks with which it is dismissed by himself.
Much of the first of these letters dealt with the international copyright debate, expressing strong outrage in him (and in some of the best people in America) over a memorial adopted at a public meeting in Boston that opposed any changes to the law. It was stated that if English authors were given any control over the republication of their own books, it would make it impossible for American editors to alter and adapt them to American tastes. This outright declaration, although it stirred Dickens's anger, ultimately defeated him. He recognized the futility of continuing any efforts to bring about the desired change and decided not only to avoid mentioning it in his upcoming book but also to see what might happen when he returned to England, by proposing a group of English authors suspend further dealings with American publishers while the law remained unchanged. Upon his return, he made a public appeal for this, announcing his own intention to forgo any profits from the authorized transmission of early proofs across the Atlantic; however, his hopes in this regard were also met with disappointment. I will now leave the topic, quoting only the general remarks with which he dismisses it in his current letter.
"Niagara Falls,"
"Tuesday, Third May, 1842.
"I'll tell you what the two obstacles to the passing of an international copyright law with England are: firstly, the national love of 'doing' a man in any bargain or matter of business; secondly, the national vanity. Both these characteristics prevail to an extent which no stranger can possibly estimate.
"I'll tell you what the two obstacles to passing an international copyright law with England are: first, the national tendency to try to outsmart someone in any deal or business matter; second, the national pride. Both of these traits are so strong that no outsider can truly understand their impact."
"With regard to the first, I seriously believe that it is an essential part of the pleasure derived from the perusal of a popular English book, that the author gets nothing for it. It is so dar-nation 'cute—so knowing in Jonathan to get his reading on those terms. He has the Englishman so regularly on the hip that his eye[409] twinkles with slyness, cunning, and delight; and he chuckles over the humor of the page with an appreciation of it quite inconsistent with, and apart from, its honest purchase. The raven hasn't more joy in eating a stolen piece of meat, than the American has in reading the English book which he gets for nothing.
"Regarding the first point, I genuinely think that an important part of the enjoyment of reading a popular English book is that the author doesn’t get anything out of it. It’s so clever—so insightful for Jonathan to get his reading on those terms. He has the Englishman so completely figured out that his eye[409] sparkles with slyness, cleverness, and joy; and he laughs at the humor of the page with an appreciation that completely separates it from its honest purchase. The raven experiences no more joy in eating a stolen piece of meat than the American does in reading the English book that he gets for free."
"With regard to the second, it reconciles that better and more elevated class who are above this sort of satisfaction, with surprising ease. The man's read in America! The Americans like him! They are glad to see him when he comes here! They flock about him, and tell him that they are grateful to him for spirits in sickness; for many hours of delight in health; for a hundred fanciful associations which are constantly interchanged between themselves and their wives and children at home! It is nothing that all this takes place in countries where he is paid; it is nothing that he has won fame for himself elsewhere, and profit too. The Americans read him; the free, enlightened, independent Americans; and what more would he have? Here's reward enough for any man. The national vanity swallows up all other countries on the face of the earth, and leaves but this above the ocean. Now, mark what the real value of this American reading is. Find me in the whole range of literature one single solitary English book which becomes popular with them before, by going through the ordeal at home and becoming popular there, it has forced itself on their attention—and I am content that the law should remain as it is, forever and a day. I must make one exception. There are some mawkish tales of fashionable life before which crowds fall down as they were gilded calves,[410] which have been snugly enshrined in circulating libraries at home, from the date of their publication.
"Regarding the second point, it easily connects with that refined class who are above this kind of satisfaction. The man’s popular in America! The Americans like him! They’re happy to see him when he’s here! They gather around him and tell him they appreciate him for lifting their spirits in sickness, for many hours of joy in good health, for a hundred whimsical memories that they share with their wives and kids back home! It doesn’t matter that all this happens in places where he’s paid; it doesn’t matter that he’s gained fame and profit elsewhere. The Americans read him; the free, enlightened, independent Americans; and what more would he want? That’s enough reward for anyone. National pride overshadows all other countries and leaves only this one standing above the ocean. Now, let’s look at the true value of this American readership. Find me a single English book in all of literature that becomes popular with them without first gaining popularity at home and drawing their attention—and I’m fine with keeping the system just as it is, forever. I do have one exception. There are some sentimental stories about fashionable life that crowds adore as if they were golden calves,[410] and these have been comfortably nestled in circulating libraries at home since they were released."
"As to telling them they will have no literature of their own, the universal answer (out of Boston) is, 'We don't want one. Why should we pay for one when we can get it for nothing? Our people don't think of poetry, sir. Dollars, banks, and cotton are our books, sir.' And they certainly are in one sense; for a lower average of general information than exists in this country on all other topics, it would be very hard to find. So much, at present, for international copyright."
"As for telling them they won’t have their own literature, the common response (from Boston) is, 'We don’t want one. Why should we pay for one when we can get it for free? Our people don't think about poetry, sir. Money, banks, and cotton are our books, sir.' And they really are in one way; it would be tough to find a place with a lower level of general knowledge on all other subjects than exists in this country. So, that’s where we stand on international copyright for now."
The same letter kept the promise made in its predecessor that one or two more sketches of character should be sent: "One of the most amusing phrases in use all through the country, for its constant repetition, and adaptation to every emergency, is 'Yes, Sir.' Let me give you a specimen." (The specimen was the dialogue, in the Notes, of straw-hat and brown-hat, during the stage-coach ride to Sandusky.) "I am not joking, upon my word. This is exactly the dialogue. Nothing else occurring to me at this moment, let me give you the secretary's portrait. Shall I?
The same letter kept the promise made in its predecessor that one or two more character sketches would be sent: "One of the most amusing phrases used all over the country, due to its constant repetition and adaptability to every situation, is 'Yes, Sir.' Let me give you an example." (The example was the dialogue in the Notes between the straw-hat and brown-hat during the stagecoach ride to Sandusky.) "I'm not joking, I swear. This is exactly the dialogue. Nothing else comes to mind at the moment, so let me share the secretary's portrait. Shall I?
"He is of a sentimental turn—strongly sentimental; and tells Anne as June approaches that he hopes 'we shall sometimes think of him' in our own country. He wears a cloak, like Hamlet; and a very tall, big, limp, dusty black hat, which he exchanges on long journeys for a cap like Harlequin's. . . . He sings; and in some of our quarters, when his bedroom has been near ours, we have heard him grunting bass notes through the keyhole of his door, to attract our attention.[411] His desire that I should formally ask him to sing, and his devices to make me do so, are irresistibly absurd. There was a piano in our room at Hartford (you recollect our being there, early in February?)—and he asked me one night, when we were alone, if 'Mrs. D.' played. 'Yes, Mr. Q.' 'Oh, indeed, Sir! I sing: so whenever you want a little soothing—' You may imagine how hastily I left the room, on some false pretense, without hearing more.
"He’s quite the sentimental type—very sentimental; and as June gets closer, he tells Anne that he hopes 'we will sometimes think of him' when we're back in our own country. He wears a cloak, like Hamlet, and a tall, big, floppy, dusty black hat, which he swaps for a cap like Harlequin's on long trips. He sings; and in some of our places, when his bedroom has been next to ours, we've heard him grunting bass notes through the keyhole of his door to get our attention.[411] His wish for me to formally ask him to sing, and his schemes to make me do it, are just hilariously ridiculous. There was a piano in our room at Hartford (remember we were there in early February?)—and one night, when we were alone, he asked me if 'Mrs. D.' played. 'Yes, Mr. Q.' 'Oh, really, Sir! I sing: so whenever you want a little soothing—' You can imagine how quickly I left the room on some pretense, without hearing any more."
"He paints. . . . An enormous box of oil-colors is the main part of his luggage: and with these he blazes away, in his own room, for hours together. Anne got hold of some big-headed, pot-bellied sketches he made of the passengers on board the canal-boat (including me in my fur coat), the recollection of which brings the tears into my eyes at this minute. He painted the Falls, at Niagara, superbly; and is supposed now to be engaged on a full-length representation of me: waiters having reported that chamber-maids have said that there is a picture in his room which has a great deal of hair. One girl opined that it was 'the beginning of the King's Arms;' but I am pretty sure that the Lion is myself. . . .
"He paints... An enormous box of oil paints is the main part of his luggage, and with these, he works for hours in his own room. Anne found some big-headed, pot-bellied sketches he made of the passengers on the canal boat (including me in my fur coat), and just thinking about them brings tears to my eyes right now. He painted the Falls at Niagara beautifully; and he's now believed to be working on a full-length portrait of me, as waiters have reported that chambermaids said there’s a picture in his room that has a lot of hair. One girl suggested it was 'the beginning of the King's Arms,' but I'm pretty sure the lion is me..."
"Sometimes, but not often, he commences a conversation. That usually occurs when we are walking the deck after dark; or when we are alone together in a coach. It is his practice at such times to relate the most notorious and patriarchal Joe Miller, as something that occurred in his own family. When traveling by coach, he is particularly fond of imitating cows and pigs; and nearly challenged a fellow-passenger the other day, who had been moved by the display of this[412] accomplishment into telling him that he was 'a Perfect Calf.' He thinks it an indispensable act of politeness and attention to inquire constantly whether we're not sleepy, or, to use his own words, whether we don't 'suffer for sleep.' If we have taken a long nap of fourteen hours or so, after a long journey, he is sure to meet me at the bedroom door when I turn out in the morning, with this inquiry. But, apart from the amusement he gives us, I could not by possibility have lighted on any one who would have suited my purpose so well. I have raised his ten dollars per month to twenty; and mean to make it up for six months."
"Sometimes, but not often, he starts a conversation. That usually happens when we’re walking on deck after dark or when we’re alone in a coach. At those times, he likes to share the most famous Joe Miller jokes as if they happened in his own family. When we're traveling by coach, he especially enjoys imitating cows and pigs; he nearly challenged a fellow passenger the other day who was so impressed by his performance that he told him he was 'a Perfect Calf.' He thinks it’s essential to always ask if we’re sleepy, or, as he puts it, whether we don’t 'suffer for sleep.' If we’ve had a long nap of about fourteen hours after a long trip, he always meets me at the bedroom door in the morning to ask that very question. But aside from the amusement he brings us, I could not have found anyone who fits my needs better. I’ve raised his pay from ten dollars a month to twenty, and I plan to support him for six months."
The conclusion of this letter was dated from "Montreal, Thursday, twelfth May," and was little more than an eager yearning for home: "This will be a very short and stupid letter, my dear friend; for the post leaves here much earlier than I expected, and all my grand designs for being unusually brilliant fall to the ground. I will write you one line by the next Cunard boat,—reserving all else until our happy and long long looked-for meeting.
The end of this letter was dated "Montreal, Thursday, May 12," and was basically just a strong desire to be home: "This
"We have been to Toronto and Kingston; experiencing attentions at each which I should have difficulty in describing. The wild and rabid toryism of Toronto is, I speak seriously, appalling. English kindness is very different from American. People send their horses and carriages for your use, but they don't exact as payment the right of being always under your nose. We had no less than five carriages at Kingston waiting our pleasure at one time; not to mention the commodore's barge and crew, and a beautiful government steamer. We dined with Sir Charles Bagot last Sunday. Lord[413] Mulgrave was to have met us yesterday at Lachine; but, as he was wind-bound in his yacht and couldn't get in, Sir Richard Jackson sent his drag four-in-hand, with two other young fellows who are also his aides, and in we came in grand style.
"We visited Toronto and Kingston, where we had experiences that are hard to put into words. The extreme Tory attitudes in Toronto are, seriously, shocking. Kindness here is quite different from what we're used to in America. People offer you their horses and carriages without expecting to be all up in your space all the time. At one point, we had no less than five carriages waiting for us in Kingston, not to mention the commodore's barge and crew, plus a beautiful government steamer. Last Sunday, we had dinner with Sir Charles Bagot. Lord[413] Mulgrave was supposed to meet us yesterday at Lachine; however, he was stuck on his yacht due to wind and couldn't make it, so Sir Richard Jackson sent his splendid four-in-hand carriage along with two other young men who are also his aides, and we arrived in style."
"The Theatricals (I think I told you[62] I had been invited to play with the officers of the Coldstream Guards here) are A Roland for an Oliver; Two o'Clock in the Morning; and either the Young Widow, or Deaf as a Post. Ladies (unprofessional) are going to play, for the first time. I wrote to Mitchell at New York for a wig for Mr. Snobbington, which has arrived, and is brilliant. If they had done Love, Law, and Physick, as at first proposed, I was already 'up' in Flexible, having played it of old, before my authorship days; but if it should be Splash in the Young Widow, you will have to do me the favor to imagine me in a smart livery-coat, shiny black hat and cockade, white knee-cords, white top-boots, blue stock, small whip, red cheeks, and dark eyebrows. Conceive Topping's state of mind if I bring this dress home and put it on unexpectedly! . . . God bless you, dear friend. I can say nothing about the seventh, the day on which we sail. It is impossible. Words cannot express what we feel, now that the time is so near. . . ."
"The Theatricals (I think I mentioned to you[62] that I was invited to perform with the officers of the Coldstream Guards here) include A Roland for an Oliver; Two o'Clock in the Morning; and either The Young Widow or Deaf as a Post. Unprofessional ladies are going to perform for the first time. I wrote to Mitchell in New York for a wig for Mr. Snobbington, which has arrived and looks amazing. If they had gone with Love, Law, and Physick, as initially proposed, I would have been prepared since I played it years ago, before I became a writer; but if we end up doing Splash in The Young Widow, you'll have to picture me in a stylish livery coat, shiny black hat and cockade, white knee breeches, white top boots, blue cravat, small whip, rosy cheeks, and dark eyebrows. Just imagine Topping's reaction if I bring this outfit home and put it on unexpectedly! . . . God bless you, dear friend. I can't say anything about the seventh, the day we set sail. It's impossible. Words can't capture what we feel now that the time is so close. . . ."
His last letter, dated from "Peasco's Hotel, Montreal, Canada, twenty-sixth of May," described the private theatricals, and inclosed me a bill of the play.
His last letter, dated from "Peasco's Hotel, Montreal, Canada, May 26th," talked about the private performances and included a program for the play.
"This, like my last, will be a stupid letter, because both Kate and I are thrown into such a state of excitement[414] by the near approach of the seventh of June that we can do nothing, and think of nothing.
"This, like my last, will be a silly letter, because both Kate and I are so excited[414] about the upcoming seventh of June that we can’t do anything or think about anything."
"The play came off last night. The audience, between five and six hundred strong, were invited as to a party; a regular table with refreshments being spread in the lobby and saloon. We had the band of the twenty-third (one of the finest in the service) in the orchestra, the theatre was lighted with gas, the scenery was excellent, and the properties were all brought from private houses. Sir Charles Bagot, Sir Richard Jackson, and their staffs were present; and as the military portion of the audience were all in full uniform, it was really a splendid scene.
The play took place last night. The audience, with around five to six hundred attendees, were treated like guests at a party; a full spread of refreshments was provided in the lobby and saloon. We had the band from the twenty-third (one of the best in the service) in the orchestra, the theater was lit with gas, the scenery was great, and all the props came from private homes. Sir Charles Bagot, Sir Richard Jackson, and their teams were there; and since the military members in the audience were all in full uniform, it was truly a fantastic sight.
"We 'went' also splendidly; though with nothing very remarkable in the acting way. We had for Sir Mark Chase a genuine odd fish, with plenty of humor; but our Tristram Sappy was not up to the marvelous reputation he has somehow or other acquired here. I am not however, let me tell you, placarded as stage-manager for nothing. Everybody was told they would have to submit to the most iron despotism; and didn't I come Macready over them? Oh, no. By no means. Certainly not. The pains I have taken with them, and the perspiration I have expended, during the last ten days, exceed in amount anything you can imagine. I had regular plots of the scenery made out, and lists of the properties wanted; and had them nailed up by the prompter's chair. Every letter that was to be delivered, was written; every piece of money that had to be given, provided; and not a single thing lost sight of. I prompted, myself, when I was not on; when I was, I made the regular prompter of the theatre my deputy;[417][416][415] and I never saw anything so perfectly touch and go, as the first two pieces. The bedroom scene in the interlude was as well furnished as Vestris had it; with a 'practicable' fireplace blazing away like mad, and everything in a concatenation accordingly. I really do believe that I was very funny: at least I know that I laughed heartily at myself, and made the part a character, such as you and I know very well: a mixture of T——, Harley, Yates, Keeley, and Jerry Sneak. It went with a roar, all through; and, as I am closing this, they have told me I was so well made up that Sir Charles Bagot, who sat in the stage-box, had no idea who played Mr. Snobbington, until the piece was over.
We did really well, even though the acting wasn’t anything extraordinary. Our Sir Mark Chase was a genuine character with a lot of humor, but our Tristram Sappy didn’t live up to his impressive reputation here. However, let me tell you, I’m not just sitting around as the stage manager for no reason. Everyone was warned that they’d have to follow strict rules; and did I end up dominating them like Macready? Oh, no. Not at all. The effort I’ve put into this and the sweat I’ve poured out over the last ten days is beyond anything you can imagine. I had detailed plans for the set and lists of props that were needed, and I posted them up by the prompter’s chair. Every letter that needed to be delivered was written out; every bit of money that had to be paid was arranged; and nothing was overlooked. I prompted the actors myself when I wasn’t on stage, and when I was, I made the regular prompter my assistant; and I’ve never seen anything so close and nerve-wracking as the first two acts. The bedroom scene in the interlude was as well put together as Vestris’s, with a 'working' fireplace blazing away, and everything else in place accordingly. I really think I was quite funny: at least I know I laughed hard at myself and turned the role into a character that you and I recognize well: a mix of T——, Harley, Yates, Keeley, and Jerry Sneak. It got a huge response all the way through; and as I’m finishing this, I’ve been told that I was so well made up that Sir Charles Bagot, who was sitting in the stage box, had no clue who played Mr. Snobbington until the performance ended.

"But only think of Kate playing! and playing devilish well, I assure you! All the ladies were capital, and we had no wait or hitch for an instant. You may suppose this, when I tell you that we began at eight, and had the curtain down at eleven. It is their custom here, to prevent heart-burnings in a very heart-burning town, whenever they have played in private, to repeat the performances in public. So, on Saturday (substituting, of course, real actresses for the ladies), we repeat the two first pieces to a paying audience, for the manager's benefit. . . .
"But just think about Kate playing! And she played incredibly well, I promise you! All the ladies were fantastic, and there wasn't a single pause or delay. You can imagine this when I tell you that we started at eight and finished by eleven. It's their practice here, to avoid any hard feelings in a town that's quite passionate, to repeat private performances in public. So, on Saturday (of course replacing the ladies with real actresses), we’ll repeat the first two pieces for a paying audience, for the manager’s benefit. …"
"I send you a bill, to which I have appended a key.
I’m sending you a bill, and I’ve attached a key.
"I have not told you half enough. But I promise you I shall make you shake your sides about this play. Wasn't it worthy of Crummles that when Lord Mulgrave and I went out to the door to receive the Governor-general, the regular prompter followed us in agony with four tall candlesticks with wax candles in[418] them, and besought us with a bleeding heart to carry two apiece, in accordance with all the precedents? . . .
"I haven't told you nearly enough. But I promise I'll have you laughing about this play. Wasn't it just like Crummles that when Lord Mulgrave and I stepped outside to greet the Governor-General, the regular prompter followed us in a panic, carrying four tall candlesticks with wax candles in[418] them, and pleaded with us, totally distressed, to carry two each, just like all the traditions?"
"I have hardly spoken of our letters, which reached us yesterday, shortly before the play began. A hundred thousand thanks for your delightful mainsail of that gallant little packet. I read it again and again; and had it all over again at breakfast-time this morning. I heard also, by the same ship, from Talfourd, Miss Coutts, Brougham, Rogers, and others. A delicious letter from Mac too, as good as his painting, I swear. Give my hearty love to him. . . . God bless you, my dear friend. As the time draws nearer, we get FEVERED with anxiety for home. . . . Kiss our darlings for us. We shall soon meet, please God, and be happier and merrier than ever we were, in all our lives. . . . Oh, home—home—home—home—home—home—HOME!!!!!!!!!!!"
"I’ve hardly talked about our letters, which arrived yesterday, just before the play started. A hundred thousand thanks for your wonderful letter that came with that brave little package. I read it over and over again; I even went through it again at breakfast this morning. I also heard from Talfourd, Miss Coutts, Brougham, Rogers, and others, all via the same ship. A delightful letter from Mac too, just as good as his painting, I swear. Send my love to him. . . . God bless you, my dear friend. As the time approaches, we’re getting really anxious to be home. . . . Please kiss our little ones for us. We’ll be together soon, God willing, and we’ll be happier and more cheerful than we’ve ever been in our lives. . . . Oh, home—home—home—home—home—home—HOME!!!!!!!!!!!"
THE LIFE
OF

THE LIFE
OF
CHARLES DICKENS
BY
JOHN FORSTER.
VOL. I.
1842-1852.
CORRECTIONS MADE IN THE LATER EDITIONS
OF THE FIRST VOLUME.
A notice written under date of the 23rd December, 1871, appeared with the Tenth Edition. "Such has been the rapidity of the demand for successive impressions of this book, that I have found it impossible, until now, to correct at pages 31, 87, and 97 three errors of statement made in the former editions; and some few other mistakes, not in themselves important, at pages 96, 101, and 102. I take the opportunity of adding, that the mention at p. 83 is not an allusion to the well-known 'Penny' and 'Saturday' magazines, but to weekly periodicals of some years' earlier date resembling them in form. One of them, I have since found from a later mention by Dickens himself, was presumably of a less wholesome and instructive character. 'I used,' he says, 'when I was at school, to take in the Terrific Register, making myself unspeakably miserable, and frightening my very wits out of my head, for the small charge of a penny weekly; which, considering that there was an illustration to every number in which there was always a pool of blood, and at least one body, was cheap.' An obliging correspondent writes to me upon my reference to the Fox-under-the-hill, at p. 62: 'Will you permit me to say, that the house, shut up and almost ruinous, is still to be found at the bottom of a curious and most precipitous court, the entrance of which is just past Salisbury-street. . . . It was once, I think, the approach to the halfpenny boats. The house is now shut out from the water-side by the Embankment.'" I proceed to state in detail what the changes thus referred to were.
An announcement written on December 23, 1871, appeared with the Tenth Edition. "The demand for new editions of this book has been so rapid that I've only now found it possible to correct three errors in statements made in earlier editions at pages 31, 87, and 97, along with a few other minor mistakes at pages 96, 101, and 102. I would also like to clarify that the mention on p. 83 does not refer to the well-known 'Penny' and 'Saturday' magazines, but to weekly publications from a few years earlier that were similar in format. One of them, as I learned from a later mention by Dickens himself, was likely less wholesome and educational. 'When I was at school,' he says, 'I used to subscribe to the Terrific Register, which made me extremely miserable and scared me out of my wits for the low price of a penny a week; this was quite a bargain, considering each issue included an illustration showing a pool of blood and at least one corpse.' A helpful reader wrote to me about my reference to the Fox-under-the-hill at p. 62: 'May I point out that the house, now closed and almost in ruins, can still be found at the end of a curious and very steep alley, the entrance of which is just past Salisbury-street. . . . It was once, I believe, the way to the halfpenny boats. The house is now separated from the riverside by the Embankment.'" I will now detail the changes mentioned.
The passage about James Lamert, beginning at the thirteenth line of p. 31, now stands: "His chief ally and encourager in these displays was a youth of some ability, much older than himself, named James Lamert, stepson to his mother's sister and therefore a sort of cousin, who was his great patron and friend in his childish days. Mary, the eldest daughter of Charles Barrow, himself a lieutenant in the navy, had for her first husband a commander in the navy called Allen; on whose death by drowning at Rio Janeiro she had joined her sister, the navy-pay clerk's wife, at Chatham; in which place she subsequently took for her second husband Doctor Lamert, an army surgeon, whose son James, even after he had been sent to Sandhurst for his education, continued still to visit Chatham from time to time. He had a turn for private theatricals; and as his father's quarters were in the ordnance-hospital there, a great rambling place otherwise at that time almost uninhabited, he had plenty of room in which to get up his[vi] entertainments." Two other corrections were consequent on this change. At the 21st line of page 38, for "the elder cousin" read "the cousin by marriage;" and at the 31st line of p. 49, "cousin by his mother's side" should be "cousin by his aunt's marriage."
The passage about James Lamert, starting at the thirteenth line of p. 31, now reads: "His main supporter and motivator in these activities was a talented young man, significantly older than him, named James Lamert. He was the stepson of his mother's sister, making him a sort of cousin, who was a major supporter and friend during his childhood. Mary, the oldest daughter of Charles Barrow, a lieutenant in the navy, had first married a navy commander named Allen; after he drowned in Rio de Janeiro, she moved in with her sister, the wife of a navy-pay clerk, in Chatham. There, she later married Doctor Lamert, an army surgeon, whose son James still visited Chatham occasionally even after being sent to Sandhurst for his education. He had an interest in private theater productions; and since his father's post was at the ordnance hospital there, a large, otherwise mostly abandoned place at that time, he had plenty of space to hold his[vi] shows." Two other corrections followed this change. At the 21st line of page 38, replace "the elder cousin" with "the cousin by marriage;" and at the 31st line of p. 49, "cousin by his mother's side" should be changed to "cousin by his aunt's marriage."
At the 15th line of the 41st page, "his bachelor-uncle, fellow-clerk," &c. should be "the uncle who was at this time fellow-clerk," &c. At the 11th line of page 54, "Charles-court" should be "Clare-court." The allusion to one of his favourite localities at the 23d line of page 62 should stand thus: "a little public-house by the water-side called the Fox-under-the-hill, approached by an underground passage which we once missed in looking for it together."
At the 15th line of the 41st page, "his bachelor-uncle, fellow-clerk," &c. should be "the uncle who was at this time fellow-clerk," &c. At the 11th line of page 54, "Charles-court" should be "Clare-court." The reference to one of his favorite spots at the 23rd line of page 62 should read: "a little pub by the water called the Fox-under-the-hill, reached by an underground passage that we once missed while looking for it together."
The passage at p. 87, having reference to an early friend who had been with him, as I supposed, at his first school, should run thus: "In this however I have since discovered my own mistake: the truth being that it was this gentleman's connection, not with the Wellington-academy, but with a school kept by Mr. Dawson in Hunter-street, Brunswick-square, where the brothers of Dickens were subsequently placed, which led to their early knowledge of each other. I fancy that they were together also, for a short time, at Mr. Molloy's in New-square, Lincoln's-inn; but, whether or not this was so, Dickens certainly had not quitted school many months before his father had made sufficient interest with an attorney of Gray's-inn, Mr. Edward Blackmore, to obtain him regular employment in his office." There is subsequent allusion to the same gentleman (at p. 182) as his "school-companion at Mr. Dawson's in Henrietta-street," which ought to stand as "having known him when himself a law-clerk in Lincoln's-inn."
The passage at p. 87, referring to an early friend who I believed was with him at his first school, should read: "In this, however, I've since realized my mistake: the truth is that it was this gentleman's connection, not with the Wellington academy, but with a school run by Mr. Dawson on Hunter Street, Brunswick Square, where Dickens's brothers were later placed, that led to their early acquaintance. I think they were also together for a brief time at Mr. Molloy's in New Square, Lincoln's Inn; but whether or not that was the case, Dickens definitely hadn't left school for long before his father had made enough of a connection with an attorney at Gray's Inn, Mr. Edward Blackmore, to secure him regular work in his office." There is later mention of the same gentleman (at p. 182) as his "school companion at Mr. Dawson's in Henrietta Street," which should be stated as "having known him when he was a law clerk in Lincoln's Inn."
At p. 96 I had stated that Mr. John Dickens reported for the Morning Chronicle; and at p. 101 that Mr. Thomas Beard reported for the Morning Herald; whereas Mr. Dickens, though in the gallery for other papers, did not report for the Chronicle, and Mr. Beard did report for that journal; and where (at p. 102) Dickens was spoken of as associated with Mr. Beard in a reporting party which represented respectively the Chronicle and Herald, the passage ought simply to have described him as "connected with a reporting party, being Lord John Russell's Devonshire contest above-named, and his associate chief being Mr. Beard, entrusted with command for the Chronicle in this particular express."
At p. 96 I mentioned that Mr. John Dickens was a reporter for the Morning Chronicle; and at p. 101 that Mr. Thomas Beard was a reporter for the Morning Herald; however, Mr. Dickens, although present in the gallery for other publications, did not report for the Chronicle, while Mr. Beard did report for that paper; and where (at p. 102) Dickens was mentioned as being part of a reporting team that represented the Chronicle and Herald, the description should have simply referred to him as "part of a reporting team, connected with Lord John Russell's Devonshire contest mentioned above, with Mr. Beard as the leading reporter for the Chronicle in this specific matter."
At p. 97 I had made a mistake about his "first published piece of writing," in too hastily assuming that he had himself forgotten what the particular piece was. It struck an intelligent and kind correspondent as very unlikely that Dickens should have fallen into error on such a point; and, making personal search for himself (as I ought to have done), discovered that what I supposed to be another piece was merely the same under another title. The description of his first printed sketch should therefore be "(Mr. Minns and his Cousin, as he afterwards entitled it, but which appeared in the magazine as A Dinner at Poplar Walk)." There is another mistake at p. 159, of "bandy-legged" instead of "bulky-legged" and, at p. 177, of "fresh fields" for "fresh woods."
At p. 97 I made a mistake regarding his "first published piece of writing," mistakenly assuming that he had forgotten what it was. An astute and kind correspondent thought it was unlikely for Dickens to have made such an error; and, after doing his own research (which I should have done), he found out that what I thought was another piece was actually the same work under a different title. The description of his first printed sketch should therefore be "(Mr. Minns and his Cousin, as he later titled it, but which appeared in the magazine as A Dinner at Poplar Walk)." There is another mistake at p. 159, of "bandy-legged" instead of "bulky-legged," and at p. 177, of "fresh fields" for "fresh woods."
Those several corrections were made in the Tenth Edition. To the Eleventh these words were prefixed (under date of the 23rd of January, 1872): "Since the above mentioned edition went to press, a published letter has rendered necessary a brief additional note to the remarks made at pp. 155-6." The remark occurs[vii] in my notice of the silly story of Mr. Cruikshank having originated Oliver Twist, and, with the note referred to, now stands in the form subjoined. "Whether all Sir Benjamin's laurels however should fall to the person by whom the tale is told,* or whether any part belongs to the authority alleged for it, is unfortunately not quite clear. There would hardly have been a doubt, if the fable had been confined to the other side of the Atlantic; but it has been reproduced and widely circulated on this side also; and the distinguished artist whom it calumniates by attributing the invention to him has been left undefended from its slander. Dickens's letter spares me the necessity of characterizing, by the only word which would have been applicable to it, a tale of such incredible and monstrous absurdity as that one of the masterpieces of its author's genius had been merely an illustration of etchings by Mr. Cruikshank!" Note to the words "person by whom the tale is told:" "*This question has been partly solved, since my last edition, by Mr. Cruikshank's announcement in the Times, that, though Dr. Mackenzie had 'confused some circumstances with respect to Mr. Dickens looking over some drawings and sketches,' the substance of his information as to who it was that originated Oliver Twist, and all its characters, had been derived from Mr. Cruikshank himself. The worst part of the foregoing fable, therefore, has not Dr. Mackenzie for its author; and Mr. Cruikshank is to be congratulated on the prudence of his rigid silence respecting it as long as Mr. Dickens lived."
Several corrections were made in the Tenth Edition. In the Eleventh, these words were added (dated January 23, 1872): "Since the mentioned edition was printed, a published letter has made it necessary to include a brief note to the comments found on pages 155-6." The comment appears[vii] in my notice of the ridiculous claim that Mr. Cruikshank originated Oliver Twist, and, along with the referenced note, now reads as follows. "It's not entirely clear whether all of Sir Benjamin's accolades should go to the person telling the story,* or if any credit should go to the source credited for it. There wouldn’t be any doubt if the story had been limited to the other side of the Atlantic, but it has been repeated and widely shared here as well; and the esteemed artist, who is wrongly accused of creating it, has been left unprotected from this slander. Dickens's letter saves me from needing to describe, with the only word that would truly apply, a tale of such unbelievable and outrageous absurdity as the notion that one of the masterpieces of its creator's genius was merely an illustration of etchings by Mr. Cruikshank!" Note on the words "person by whom the tale is told:" "*This question has been partly clarified since my last edition, by Mr. Cruikshank's statement in the Times, that, although Dr. Mackenzie had 'mixed up some details regarding Mr. Dickens reviewing some drawings and sketches,' the essence of his information about who originated Oliver Twist, and all its characters, came directly from Mr. Cruikshank himself. Therefore, the worst part of the preceding fable is not authored by Dr. Mackenzie; and Mr. Cruikshank deserves credit for wisely remaining silent about it while Mr. Dickens was alive."
In the Twelfth Edition I mentioned, in the note at p. 149, a little work of which all notice had been previously omitted; and the close of that note now runs: "He had before written for them, without his name, Sunday under Three Heads; and he added subsequently a volume of Young Couples." At p. 157, "parish abuses" is corrected in the same edition to "parish practices;" and at p. 173, "in his later works" to "in his latest works."
In the Twelfth Edition, I pointed out in the note on p. 149 a small work that had been overlooked before; and the end of that note now reads: "He had previously written for them, without his name, Sunday under Three Heads; and he later added a volume called Young Couples." On p. 157, "parish abuses" is updated in the same edition to "parish practices;" and on p. 173, "in his later works" is changed to "in his latest works."
I have received letters from several obliging correspondents, among them three or four who were scholars at the Wellington-house Academy before or after Dickens's time, and one who attended the school with him; but such remark as they suggest will more properly accompany my third and closing volume.
I’ve gotten letters from a few helpful correspondents, including three or four who were students at the Wellington-house Academy during or after Dickens' time, and one who went to school with him; however, any comments they inspire will be better suited for my third and final volume.
Palace Gate House, Kensington,
29th of October, 1872.
Kensington Palace Gate House,
October 29, 1872.
ILLUSTRATIONS.
PAGE | |
Autograph of Charles Dickens | Fly leaf |
Charles Dickens, æt. 47. From the portrait painted for the author in 1859 by W. P. Frith, R.A. Engraved by Robert Graves, A.R.A. | Frontispiece |
Charles Dickens, his Wife, and her Sister. Drawn by Daniel Maclise R.A. in 1842. Engraved by C. H. Jeens | 48 |
Sketch of the Villa Bagnerello (Albaro), by Angus Fletcher | 121 |
Drawing of the Palazzo Peschiere (Genoa), by Mr. Batson | 141 |
At 58, Lincoln's-inn-fields, Monday the 2nd of December, 1844. From a drawing by Daniel Maclise, R.A. Engraved by C. H. Jeens | 174 |
Rosemont, Lausanne. From a drawing by the Hon. Mrs. Watson | 229 |
M. Barthelémy's card | 325 |
Seventeen "fancies" for Mr. Dombey. Designed by H. K. Browne | 345 |
Twelve more similar fancies. From the design of the same artist | 346 |
Charles Dickens to George Cruikshank. Facsimile of a letter written in 1838, concerning the later illustrations to Oliver Twist | 349-50 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
CHAPTER I. 1842. | |
Pages 21-39. | |
American Notes. Age. 30. | |
PAGE | |
Return from America | 21 |
Longfellow in England | 22 |
At Broadstairs | 23 |
Preparing Notes | 23 |
Fancy for opening of Chuzzlewit | 24 |
Attractions at Margate | 25 |
Being, not always Believing | 26 |
Burlesque of classic tragedy | 26 |
A smart man and forged letter | 26 |
A proposed dedication | 27 |
Authorship and sea bathing | 28 |
Easy-living rich and patient poor | 28 |
Coming to the end | 29 |
Rejected motto for Notes | 30 |
Home of the Every Day Book | 31 |
Scene at a funeral | 32 |
An introductory chapter suppressed | 33 |
Chapter first printed | 33-37 |
Jeffrey's opinion of the Notes | 38 |
Later page anticipated | 38 |
Experience of America in 1868 | 38 |
CHAPTER II. 1843. | |
Pages 40-62. | |
First Year of Martin Chuzzlewit. Æt. 31. | |
A sunset at Land's-end | 40 |
A holiday described by C. D. | 41 |
The same described by Maclise | 42 |
A landscape and a portrait | 43 |
Names first given to Chuzzlewit | 44 |
Origin of the novel | 45 |
Prologue to a play | 45 |
On a tragedy by Browning | 46 |
George Eliot's first book | 47 |
Accompaniments of work | 47 |
Miss Georgina Hogarth | 48 |
Three portraits | 49 |
A public benefactor | 50 |
Controversy on Notes | 50 |
Original of Mrs. Gamp | 51 |
What he will do with her | 51 |
John Black | 53 |
Macready and America | 53 |
Apprehended disservice | 54 |
Exertions for Elton family | 55 |
Seaside life in ordinary | 55 |
Public speeches | 56 |
Ragged schools and results | 57 |
Unitarianism | 59 |
Return to Church of England | 59 |
Language of his Will | 59 |
Christmas Carol | 60 |
Birth of third son | 61 |
Amusing letter | 61 |
CHAPTER III. 1843-1844. | |
Pages 63-92. | |
Chuzzlewit Disappointments and A Christmas Carol. Æt. 31-32. | |
Falling-off in Chuzzlewit sale | 63 |
Publishers and authors | 64 |
Premature fears | 65 |
Resolve to change his publishers | 66 |
Proposal to his printers | 66 |
Desire to travel again | 67 |
Ways and means | 68 |
[x]Objections to the scheme | 69 |
Confidence in himself | 70 |
Want of confidence in others | 70 |
Bent on his plan | 71 |
Turning point of his career | 72 |
Grounds for course taken | 73 |
On Martin Chuzzlewit | 74 |
American portions | 75 |
The book's special superiority | 76 |
News from America | 76 |
American consolations | 77 |
Why no Pecksniffs in France | 78 |
Why Tartuffes in England | 78 |
A favourite scene of Thackeray's | 79 |
Process of creation in a novel | 80 |
Intended motto for story | 81 |
Leading characters | 82 |
A superb masterpiece | 83 |
Triumph of humorous art | 84 |
Publication of Christmas Carol | 84 |
Unrealized hopes | 85 |
Results of Carol sale | 86 |
Renewed negotiations with printers | 87 |
Agreement with Bradbury and Evans | 88 |
Letters about the Carol | 89 |
Spirit of the book | 90 |
Something better than literature | 91 |
CHAPTER IV. 1844. | |
Pages 93-110. | |
Year of Departure for Italy. Age. 32. | |
Gore-house friends | 93 |
Sensitive for his calling | 94 |
A troublesome cheque | 95 |
Education speeches | 95 |
Sufferings from stage-adaptations | 96 |
Wrongs from piracy | 96 |
Proceedings in Chancery | 97 |
A pirate's plea | 97 |
Result of Chancery experience | 99 |
Piracy preferred | 99 |
Reliefs to work | 100 |
The tempted and tempter | 101 |
Favourite bit of humour | 102 |
Criticized without humour | 102 |
Taine on Dickens | 102 |
Macready in New Orleans | 103 |
Society in England | 104 |
Writing in the Chronicle | 104 |
Conference with its new editor | 104 |
Preparations for departure | 105 |
In temporary quarters | 106 |
Begging-letter case | 106 |
The farewell dinner-party | 107 |
"Evenings of a Working-man" | 108 |
Greenwich dinner | 109 |
J. M. W. Turner and Carlyle | 110 |
CHAPTER V. 1844. | |
Pages 111-138. | |
Idleness at Albaro: Villa Bagnerello. Æt. 32. | |
The travel to Italy | 111 |
A bit of character | 112 |
French thrown away | 112 |
The Albaro villa | 113 |
First experiences | 114 |
Cloudy weather | 115 |
Sunsets and scenery | 116 |
Address to Maclise | 116 |
The Mediterranean | 117 |
Colours of sky and sea | 117 |
Warning to Maclise | 118 |
Perishing frescoes | 118 |
French Consul at Genoa | 119 |
Rooms in villa described | 120 |
Surrounding scenery | 121 |
Church-ruin on the rocks | 121 |
Angus Fletcher's sketch | 121 |
Work in abeyance | 122 |
Learning Italian | 122 |
Domestic news | 123 |
His English servants | 123 |
English residents | 124 |
Genoa the superb | 125 |
Church splendours and tinsel | 126 |
Theatres | 126 |
Italian plays | 127 |
[xi]Dumas' Kean | 127 |
Religious houses | 128 |
Sunday promenade | 128 |
Winter residence chosen | 129 |
A lucky arrival | 129 |
Dinner at French Consul's | 130 |
Verses in C. D.'s honour | 130 |
Others in Prince Joinville's | 131 |
Rumours of war with England | 131 |
A Marquis's reception | 132 |
Flight and tumble | 133 |
Quiet enjoyments | 134 |
English visitors and news | 135 |
Talk with Lord Robertson | 135 |
A suggestion for Jerrold | 136 |
Visit of Frederick Dickens | 136 |
An inn on the Alps | 136 |
Dangers of sea-bathing | 137 |
A change beginning | 138 |
CHAPTER VI. 1844. | |
Pages 139-162. | |
Work in Genoa: Palazzo Peschiere. Æt. 32. | |
Palace of the Fish-ponds | 139 |
Rooms and frescoes | 140 |
View over the city | 141 |
Dancing and praying | 142 |
Peschiere garden | 142 |
Trying to write | 143 |
A difficulty settled | 143 |
Craving for streets | 144 |
Design for his book | 144 |
Governor's levee | 144 |
Absence of the poet | 145 |
Subject he is working at | 145 |
C. D.'s politics | 146 |
Choice of a hero | 147 |
Master-passion | 147 |
Religious sentiment | 147 |
A dream | 148 |
Dialogue in a vision | 149 |
"What is the True religion?" | 149 |
Fragments of reality in a vision | 149 |
Trying regions of thought | 150 |
Reverence for Doctor Arnold | 150 |
First part of book finished | 151 |
Anticipation of its close | 151 |
Differences from published tale | 152 |
First outline of the Chimes | 152-156 |
Liking for the subject | 156 |
What the writing cost him | 156 |
Realities of fictitious sorrow | 157 |
Wild mountain weather | 157 |
Banquet at the Whistle | 158 |
Startling news | 158 |
Coming to London | 159 |
Secret of the visit | 160 |
Eager to try effect of story | 160 |
Plans a reading at my rooms | 160 |
The tale finished | 161 |
Proposed travel | 161 |
Party for the Reading | 162 |
CHAPTER VII. 1844. | |
Pages 163-178. | |
Italian Travel. Æt. 32. | |
Cities and people | 163 |
Venice | 164 |
Rapture of enjoyment | 165 |
Aboard the city | 165 |
What he saw and felt | 165 |
Solitary thoughts | 166 |
At Lodi | 166 |
About paintings and engravings | 167 |
Titian and Tintoretto | 168 |
Conventionalities | 169 |
Monks and painters | 169 |
The inns | 170 |
Compensation for discomfort | 170 |
Brave C of his Pictures | 171 |
Louis Roche of Avignon | 171 |
Dinner at the Peschiere | 172 |
Custom-house officers | 173 |
At Milan and Strasburg | 173 |
Passing the Simplon | 174 |
In London | 174 |
A Reading in Lincoln's-inn-fields | 174 |
Persons present | 175 |
Success of the visit | 175 |
[xii]In Paris with Macready | 176 |
Origin of our private play | 176 |
A recognition at Marseilles | 177 |
Friendly Americans | 177 |
On board for Genoa | 177 |
Information for travellers | 178 |
CHAPTER VIII. 1845. | |
Pages 179-200. | |
Last Months in Italy. Æt. 33. | |
Birthday gift for eldest son | 179 |
Suspicious "Characters" | 180 |
Jesuit interferences | 180 |
Birth of 1845 | 180 |
Travel southward | 181 |
Carrara and Pisa | 181 |
A wild journey | 182 |
Birds of prey | 183 |
A beggar and his staff | 183 |
"My lord" loses temper | 184 |
And has the worst of it | 184 |
At Rome | 184 |
The Campagna | 185 |
Bay of Naples | 185 |
Filth of Naples and Fondi | 186 |
The Lazzaroni | 186 |
False picturesque | 187 |
Sad English news | 187 |
True friends in calamity | 188 |
At Florence | 188 |
Wayside memorials and Landor's villa | 189 |
Death of Bobus Smith | 190 |
At Lord Holland's | 190 |
Lord Palmerston's brother | 190 |
Again at the Peschiere | 190 |
To publish or not? | 191 |
Thoughts of home | 192 |
American friends | 192 |
Deaths among English residents | 193 |
Scarlet breeches out of place | 193 |
Angus Fletcher | 193 |
Complaint of a meek footman | 194 |
Recalling Lady Holland | 194 |
A touch of Portsmouth | 195 |
Plans for meeting | 196 |
Last letter from Genoa | 196 |
Closing excitements and troubles | 196 |
Italians hard at work | 197 |
Returning by Switzerland | 197 |
Passage of the St. Gothard | 198 |
Splendours of Swiss scenery | 198 |
Dangers of it | 199 |
What is left behind the Alps | 199 |
A week in Flanders | 200 |
CHAPTER IX. 1845-1846. | |
Pages 201-221. | |
Back in England. Æt. 33-34. | |
Old hopes revived | 201 |
Notions for a periodical | 201 |
Proposed prospectus | 202 |
Chances for and against it | 203 |
Swept away by larger venture | 203 |
Christmas book of 1845 | 204 |
D'Orsay and the courier | 204 |
Another passage of Autobiography | 204 |
More of the story of early years | 205 |
Wish to try the stage | 205 |
Applies to manager of Covent Garden | 205 |
Sister Fanny in the secret | 206 |
Stage studies and rehearsings | 206 |
Strange news for Macready | 207 |
Requisites of author and actor | 208 |
Play chosen for private performance | 209 |
Fanny Kelly and her theatre | 209 |
Every Man in his Humour | 209 |
The company of actors | 210 |
Enjoying a character | 210 |
Troubles of management | 210 |
First and second performances | 211 |
Of the acting | 211 |
C. D. as performer | 212 |
C. D. as manager | 212 |
Two human mysteries | 213 |
The mysteries explained | 213 |
Training for the stage | 213 |
[xiii]At Broadstairs | 214 |
Ramsgate entertainments | 214 |
Birth of fourth son | 215 |
Second raven's death | 215 |
Intended daily paper | 215 |
Disturbing engagements | 216 |
Old ways interrupted | 216 |
My appeal against the enterprise | 217 |
Reply and issue | 217 |
Interruption and renewal | 218 |
The beginning and the end | 218 |
Forming new resolve | 219 |
Back to old scenes | 219 |
Editorship ceased | 219 |
Going to Switzerland | 220 |
A happy saying | 221 |
Leaves England | 221 |
CHAPTER X. 1846. | |
Pages 222-243. | |
A Home in Switzerland. Æt. 34. | |
On the Rhine | 222 |
German readers of Dickens | 223 |
Travelling Englishmen | 223 |
A hoaxing-match | 224 |
House-hunting | 224 |
Tempted by a mansion | 225 |
Chooses a cottage | 225 |
Earliest impressions | 226 |
Lausanne described | 227 |
Views from his farm | 228 |
Under his windows | 228 |
A sketch of Rosemont | 229 |
Design as to work | 230 |
The English colony | 231 |
Unaccommodating carriage | 232 |
A death in the lake | 232 |
Boatman's narrative | 233 |
The Theatre | 233 |
The Prison | 234 |
The Blind Institution | 235 |
Interesting cases | 235-240 |
Beginning work | 240 |
First slip of New Novel | 241 |
Sortes Shandyanæ | 242 |
The Christmas tale | 242 |
CHAPTER XI. 1846. | |
Pages 244-260. | |
Swiss People and Scenery. Æt. 34. | |
The mountains and lake | 244 |
The people and their manners | 245 |
A country fête | 246 |
Family sketch | 246 |
Rifle-shooting | 247 |
A marriage on the farm | 248 |
Gunpowder festivities | 248 |
Bride and mother | 248 |
First number of Dombey | 249 |
Christmas book | 249 |
General idea for new story | 250 |
Hints for illustration of it | 250 |
Haldimands and Cerjats | 251 |
Visit of Henry Hallam | 251 |
Local news | 252 |
Sight-seers from England | 252 |
Trip to Chamounix | 253 |
Mule-travelling | 253 |
Mont Blanc range | 254 |
Mer de Glace | 255 |
Tête Noire pass | 255 |
Help in an accident | 256 |
English, French, and Prussian | 256 |
Second number of Dombey | 257 |
Castle of Chillon described | 257 |
Honour to New Constitution | 258 |
Political celebration | 258 |
Malcontents | 259 |
Good conduct of the people | 259 |
Protestant and Catholic cantons | 260 |
A timely word on Ireland | 260 |
CHAPTER XII. 1846. | |
Pages 261-276. | |
Personal Sketches. Age. 34. | |
Home politics | 261 |
The Whigs and Peel | 261 |
Belief in emigration schemes | 262 |
[xiv]Mark Lemon | 263 |
An incident of character | 263 |
Hood's Tylney Hall | 264 |
Trait of the Duke of Wellington | 264 |
Mr. Watson of Rockingham | 264 |
A recollection of reporting days | 265 |
Returns to Dombey | 265 |
Two English travellers | 266 |
Party among the hills | 267 |
A Smollett and Fielding hero | 268 |
Milksop youths | 268 |
Ogre and Lambs | 268 |
Sir Joseph and his family | 269 |
Lord Vernon | 270 |
Passion for rifle-shooting | 270 |
A wonderful carriage | 270 |
The Ladies Taylor | 271 |
Proposed Reading of first Dombey | 272 |
A sketch from life | 272 |
Two sisters and their books | 272 |
Trip to Great St. Bernard | 273 |
Ascent of the mountain | 274 |
The Convent | 274 |
Scene at the mountain top | 274 |
Bodies found in the snow | 275 |
The holy fathers | 275 |
A tavern all but sign | 276 |
The monk and Pickwick | 276 |
CHAPTER XIII. 1846. | |
Pages 277-294. | |
Literary Work at Lausanne. Æt. 34. | |
A picture completed | 277 |
Great present want | 277 |
Daily life | 278 |
Imaginative needs | 278 |
Self-judgments | 279 |
The Now and the Hereafter | 279 |
Fancies for Christmas books | 280 |
Second number of Dombey | 280 |
A personal revelation | 281 |
Craving for streets | 281 |
Food for fancy | 282 |
Second Dombey done | 282 |
Curious wants of the mind | 283 |
Success of the Reading | 283 |
First thought of Public Readings | 284 |
Two stories in hand | 285 |
Unexpected difficulties | 286 |
Work under sensitive conditions | 286 |
Alarm for Dombey | 287 |
Doubts and misgivings | 287 |
Change of scene to be tried | 287 |
At Genoa | 288 |
Disquietudes of authorship | 288 |
Wanting counsel | 289 |
At the worst | 289 |
Report of Genoa | 290 |
A new social experience | 290 |
Feminine eccentricities | 291 |
A ladies' dinner | 291 |
Elephant-quellers | 292 |
"Like a Manchester cotton mill" | 292 |
Again at Rosemont | 293 |
Visit of the Talfourds | 293 |
Lodging his friends | 294 |
Intentions and hope | 294 |
CHAPTER XIV. 1846. | |
Pages 295-315. | |
Revolution in Geneva. Christmas Book and Final Days in Switzerland. Age. 34. | |
An arrival of manuscript | 295 |
A title | 295 |
Large sale of Dombey | 296 |
Again at Geneva | 296 |
Rising against the Jesuits | 297 |
Back to Lausanne | 297 |
The fight in Geneva | 298 |
Rifle against cannon | 299 |
True objection to Roman-Catholicism | 299 |
Genevese "aristocracy" | 299 |
A lesson | 300 |
Traces left by revolution | 300 |
[xv]Abettors of revolution | 301 |
Where the shoe pinches | 301 |
Daily News' changes | 302 |
My surrender of editorship | 302 |
Thoughts for the future | 303 |
Letters about Battle of Life | 303 |
Jeffrey's opinion | 303 |
Sketch of story | 304 |
A difficulty in plot | 305 |
Old characteristics | 305 |
His own comments | 306 |
Reply to criticism | 307 |
Stanfield illustrations | 307 |
Doubts of third part | 308 |
Strengthening the close | 308 |
Objections invited | 309 |
Tendency to blank verse | 309 |
Grave mistake by Leech | 310 |
How dealt with by C. D. | 310 |
First impulse | 311 |
Kindly afterthought | 311 |
Lord Gobden and free trade | 312 |
Needs while at work | 312 |
Pleasures of autumn | 313 |
Striking tents | 314 |
Sadness of leave-taking | 314 |
Travelling to Paris | 314 |
At Paris | 315 |
CHAPTER XV. 1846-1847. | |
Pages 316-333. | |
Three Months in Paris. Æt. 34-35. | |
A greeting from Lord Brougham | 316 |
French Sunday | 317 |
A house taken | 317 |
Absurdity of the abode | 318 |
Its former tenant | 319 |
Sister Fanny's illness | 319 |
Opinion of Elliotson | 320 |
The king of the barricades | 320 |
Unhealthy symptoms | 321 |
Incident in the streets | 321 |
The Parisian population | 322 |
Americans and French | 322 |
Unsettlement of plans | 323 |
Eldest son's education | 323 |
A true friend | 323 |
Christmas tale on the stage | 323 |
An alarming neighbour | 325 |
Startling blue-devils | 326 |
Approach to cannibalism | 326 |
In London | 326 |
Cheap edition of works | 326 |
Suppressed dedication | 326 |
Return to Paris | 326 |
Begging-letter writers | 327 |
Friendly services | 327 |
Imaginary dialogue | 328 |
A Boulogne reception | 328 |
Cautions to a traveller | 329 |
Citizen Dickens | 330 |
Sight-seeing | 330 |
At theatres | 330 |
Visits to famous Frenchmen | 331 |
Evening with Victor Hugo | 331 |
Adventure with a coachman | 332 |
Bibliothèque Royale | 333 |
Premonitory symptoms | 333 |
In London | 334 |
A party at Gore-house | 334 |
Illness of eldest son | 335 |
Snuff-shop readings | 336 |
Old charwoman's compliment | 336 |
CHAPTER XVI. 1846-1848. | |
Pages 337-367. | |
Dombey and Son. Age. 34-36. | |
Drift of the tale | 337 |
Why undervalued | 338 |
Mistakes of critics | 338 |
Adherence to first design | 338 |
Plan for Paul and his sister | 339 |
For Dombey and his daughter | 339 |
Proposed course of the story | 340 |
"The stock of the soup" | 340 |
Walter Gay and his fate | 341 |
Decided favourably | 341 |
Six pages too much | 342 |
Omissions objected to | 342 |
[xvi]New chapter written | 343 |
Portions sacrificed | 343 |
Anxiety for the face of his hero | 344 |
A suggested type of city-gentleman | 344 |
Artist-fancies for Mr. Dombey | 345-6 |
Dickens and his illustrators | 347 |
A silly story repeated | 347 |
Why noticed again | 348 |
Facsimile of letter to Cruikshank | 349-50 |
Dickens's words at the time | 349 |
Cruikshank's thirty-four years after | 350 |
A masterpiece of Dickens's writing | 351 |
Picture of him at work | 352 |
An experience of Ben Jonson's | 352 |
How objections are taken | 352 |
Shall Paul's life be prolonged? | 353 |
A Reading of the second number | 353 |
A number to be added to Paul's life | 354 |
Failure of an illustration | 354 |
What it should have been | 355 |
The Mrs. Pipchin of his childhood | 355 |
First thought of his Autobiography | 356 |
Opening his fourth number | 356 |
At Doctor Blimber's | 357 |
Paul's school life | 357 |
Paul and Florence | 357 |
Jeffrey's forecast of the tale | 358 |
Beginning his fifth number | 359 |
What he will do with it | 359 |
A damper to the spirits | 359 |
Close of Paul's life | 360 |
Jeffrey on Paul's death | 361 |
Thoughts for Edith | 362 |
Florence and Little Nell | 362 |
Judgments and comparisons | 363 |
Edith's first destiny | 363 |
Doubts suggested | 364 |
An important change | 364 |
Diogenes remembered | 365 |
Other characters | 365 |
Blimber establishment | 366 |
Supposed originals | 366 |
Surmises entirely wrong | 367 |
CHAPTER XVII. 1847-1852. | |
Pages 368-402. | |
Great Walk. Æt. 35-40. | |
Birth of fifth son | 368 |
Death of Lieut. Sydney Dickens | 368 |
Proposed benefit for Leigh Hunt | 369 |
The plays and actors | 370 |
The manager | 370 |
Troubles at rehearsals | 371 |
Pains rewarded | 371 |
Leigh Hunt's account | 372 |
Receipts and expenses | 373 |
Lord Lytton's prologue | 373 |
Appearance of Mrs. Gamp | 374 |
Fancy for a jeu d'esprit | 374 |
Mrs. Gamp at the play | 375 |
Failure of artists | 375 |
An unfinished fancy | 375 |
Mrs. Gamp with the strollers | 376 |
Alarm of Mrs. Harris | 376 |
Leigh Hunt and Poole | 377 |
Ticklish society | 378 |
Mrs. Gamp's cabman | 378 |
George Cruikshank | 379 |
Mr. Wilson the barber | 379 |
Wig experiences | 380 |
Fatigues of a powder ball | 380 |
Manager's moustache and whiskers | 381 |
Leech, Lemon, and Jerrold | 381-2 |
Mrs. Gamp's dislike of "Dougladge" | 382 |
Costello, Stone, and Egg | 383 |
"Only the engine" | 384 |
Cruikshank's Bottle | 384 |
Profits of Dombey | 385 |
Time come for savings | 385 |
Proposed edition of old novels | 385 |
Another dropped design | 386 |
The Praslin tragedy | 386 |
Penalty for seeing before others | 387 |
Street-music | 387 |
Margate theatre and manager | 387 |
As to Christmas book | 388 |
[xvii]Delay found necessary | 389 |
A literary Kitely | 389 |
Meetings at Leeds and Glasgow | 390 |
Book-friends | 391 |
Sheriff Alison | 391 |
Hospitable welcome | 391 |
Scott-monument | 392 |
Purchase of Shakespeare's house | 392 |
Scheme to benefit Knowles | 393 |
Plays rehearsed | 394 |
Merry Wives chosen | 394 |
Performances and result | 394 |
At Knebworth-park | 395 |
Guild of Literature and Art | 396 |
Unfortunate omission | 396 |
The farce that was to be written | 396 |
The farce that was substituted | 397 |
Not so Bad as we Seem | 397 |
Travelling theatre and scenes | 398 |
Success of the comedy | 398 |
An incident at Sunderland | 399 |
Troubles of a manager | 399 |
Acting under difficulties | 400 |
Scenery overturned | 401 |
Effects of fright | 401 |
Mr. Wilkie Collins | 402 |
CHAPTER XVIII. 1848-1851. | |
Pages 403-441. | |
Beach Vacations. Æt. 36-39. | |
Louis Philippe dethroned | 403 |
French missive from C. D. | 404 |
Aspirations of Citizen Dickens | 404 |
At Broadstairs | 405 |
By rail to China | 405 |
The Junk | 406 |
Mariners on deck and in cabin | 406 |
Perplexing questions | 406 |
A toy-shop on the seas | 407 |
Type of finality | 407 |
A contrast | 408 |
Home questions | 408 |
Temperance agitations | 409 |
The temptations to gin-shop | 409 |
Necessity of dealing with them | 409 |
Stages anterior to drunkenness | 410 |
Cruikshank's satire | 410 |
Realities of his pencil | 411 |
Its one-sidedness | 411 |
Dickens on Hogarth | 412 |
Cause as well as effect | 412 |
Exit of Gin-lane | 412 |
Wisdom of the great painter | 413 |
Late, but never too late | 413 |
Dickens on designs by Leech | 414 |
Originality of Leech | 414 |
Superiority of his method | 415 |
The requisites for it | 415 |
Excuses for the rising generation | 416 |
Intellectual juvenility | 416 |
A dangerous youth | 417 |
What Leech will be remembered for | 417 |
Odd adventures | 418 |
Pony-chaise accident | 418 |
Parallel to Squeers | 419 |
Strenuous idleness | 419 |
French philosophy | 420 |
Hint for Mr. Taine | 420 |
The better for idleness | 421 |
A favourite spot | 421 |
At Brighton | 421 |
With mad folks and doctors | 422 |
A name for his new book | 422 |
At Broadstairs | 422 |
Troubles in his writing | 423 |
A letter in character | 423 |
At Bonchurch | 425 |
The Rev. James White | 425 |
Mirth and melancholy | 425 |
Mrs. James White | 426 |
First impressions of Undercliff | 426 |
Talfourd made a judge | 427 |
Dickens's affection for him | 427 |
Church-school examination | 428 |
Dinners and pic-nics | 428 |
The comedian Regnier | 429 |
When acting is genuine | 429 |
Doubts as to health | 429 |
Arrivals and departures | 430 |
A startling revelation | 431 |
Effects of Bonchurch climate | 431 |
[xviii]Utter prostration | 431 |
Difficulties of existing there | 432 |
Distrust of doctors | 433 |
Other side of picture | 433 |
What I observed at the time | 434 |
From the Copperfield MS. | 434 |
Mr. Browne's sketch of Micawber | 435 |
Accident to John Leech | 435 |
Its consequences | 435 |
Depressing influences | 436 |
At Broadstairs | 436 |
Railway travellers | 437 |
The exhibition year | 438 |
A Copperfield banquet | 438 |
C. D. on money values | 439 |
His leisure reading | 439 |
A correction for Carlyle | 440 |
Good criticism | 441 |
Thoughts of a new book | 441 |
The old restlessness | 441 |
Beginning on a Friday | 441 |
CHAPTER XIX. 1848-1850. | |
Pages 442-456. | |
Haunted Man and Household Words. Age. 36-40. | |
Maturing book for Christmas | 442 |
Friendly plea for Mr. Macrone | 442 |
Completion of Christmas story | 443 |
Dropped motto | 443 |
The "ghost" and the "bargain" | 444 |
The Tetterby family | 445 |
Teachings of the little tale | 445 |
His own statement of its intention | 446 |
Forgive that you may forget | 446 |
Copperfield sales | 447 |
A letter from Russia | 448 |
Translation into Russian | 448 |
Sympathy of Siberia | 448 |
The Periodical taking form | 449 |
A design for it described | 449 |
Original and selected matter | 449 |
A Shadow for everywhere | 450 |
Hopes of success | 450 |
Doubts respecting it | 451 |
Incompatibility of design | 451 |
New design chosen | 452 |
Assistant editor appointed | 453 |
Titles proposed | 453 |
Appearance of first number | 454 |
Earliest contributors | 454 |
Opinion of Mr. Sala | 454 |
Child's dream of a star | 455 |
A fancy derived from childhood | 456 |
CHAPTER XX. 1848-1851. | |
Pages 457-494. | |
Last Years in Devonshire Terrace. Age. 36-39. | |
Sentiment about places | 457 |
Confidences | 458 |
Personal revelations | 458 |
Early memories | 459 |
At his sister's sick-bed | 459 |
Last thoughts | 460 |
Sister's death | 460 |
Book to be written in first person | 461 |
Riding over Salisbury Plain | 461 |
Visiting scene of a tragedy | 462 |
First sees Yarmouth | 462 |
Birth of sixth son | 462 |
Notion for a character | 463 |
Choosing a title | 463 |
"Mag's Diversions" | 464 |
"Copperfield" chosen | 464 |
Varieties of it proposed | 465 |
Title finally determined | 466 |
Difficulties of opening | 466 |
Rogers and Benedict | 466 |
Wit of Fonblanque | 467 |
Procter and Macready | 467 |
The Sheridans | 468 |
Lord Byron's Ada | 469 |
Dinner to Halévy and Scribe | 469 |
Brougham and "the Punch people" | 469 |
The Duke at Vauxhall | 470 |
Carlyle and Thackeray | 470 |
Judicious change of a "tag" | 471 |
[xix]A fact for a biographer | 471 |
Marryat's delight with children | 472 |
Bulwer Lytton and Monckton Milnes | 472 |
Lords Nugent and Dudley Stuart | 472-3 |
Kemble, Harness, and Dyce | 473 |
Mrs. Siddons and John Kemble | 473 |
Comparison and good distinction | 474 |
Mazzini and Edinburgh friends | 474 |
Artist-acquaintance | 475 |
Visitors at his house | 475 |
Friends from America | 476 |
M. Van de Weyer | 476 |
Ambition to see into heaven | 477 |
Literature and art in the city | 477 |
Doubtful compliment | 478 |
A hint for London citizens | 478 |
Letter against public executions | 479 |
American observer in England | 479 |
Marvels of English manners | 480 |
A letter from Rockingham | 481 |
Private theatricals | 481 |
Major Bentley and General Boxall | 481-2 |
A family scene | 482 |
Doing too much | 483 |
Death of Francis Jeffrey | 483 |
Progress of work | 484 |
The child-wife | 484 |
A run to Paris | 484 |
Banker or proctor | 485 |
Doubts as to Dora settled | 486 |
Of Rogers and Landor | 486 |
A third daughter born | 487 |
At Great Malvern | 487 |
Macready's farewell | 488 |
Experience of a brother author | 488 |
The Home at Shepherd's-bush | 488 |
Father's illness | 489 |
Death of John Dickens | 489 |
Tribute by his son | 490 |
Theatrical-fund dinner | 490 |
Plea for small actors | 491 |
Remembering the forgotten | 491 |
Death of his little daughter | 492 |
Difficult tasks in life | 492 |
Dora's grave | 493 |
Advocating sanitary reform | 493 |
Lord Shaftesbury | 494 |
Realities of his books to Dickens | 494 |
THE LIFE
OF
CHARLES DICKENS.
CHAPTER I.
AMERICAN NOTES.
1842.
The reality did not fall short of the anticipation of home. His return was the occasion of unbounded enjoyment; and what he had planned before sailing as the way we should meet, received literal fulfilment. By the sound of his cheery voice I first knew that he was come; and from my house we went together to Maclise, also "without a moment's warning." A Greenwich dinner in which several friends (Talfourd, Milnes, Procter, Maclise, Stanfield, Marryat, Barham, Hood, and Cruikshank[22] among them) took part, and other immediate greetings, followed; but the most special celebration was reserved for autumn, when, by way of challenge to what he had seen while abroad, a home-journey was arranged with Stanfield, Maclise, and myself for his companions, into such of the most striking scenes of a picturesque English county as the majority of us might not before have visited: Cornwall being ultimately chosen.
The reality lived up to the anticipation of home. His return was a time of pure joy; and what he had planned before leaving became a reality. I first realized he was back by the sound of his happy voice, and from my place, we headed to Maclise, also "without a moment's warning." We had a dinner in Greenwich with several friends (Talfourd, Milnes, Procter, Maclise, Stanfield, Marryat, Barham, Hood, and Cruikshank[22] among them) and exchanged other quick greetings, but the most special celebration was set for autumn. To challenge what he had experienced abroad, Stanfield, Maclise, and I planned a journey through some of the most beautiful spots in a picturesque English county that many of us had not seen before: Cornwall was ultimately chosen.
Before our departure he was occupied by his preparation of the American Notes; and to the same interval belongs the arrival in London of Mr. Longfellow, who became his guest, and (for both of us I am privileged to add) our attached friend. Longfellow's name was not then the pleasant and familiar word it has since been in England; but he had already written several of his most felicitous pieces, and he possessed all the qualities of delightful companionship, the culture and the charm, which have no higher type or example than the accomplished and genial American. He reminded me, when lately again in England, of two experiences out of many we had enjoyed together this quarter of a century before. One of them was a day at Rochester, when, met by one of those prohibitions which are the wonder of visitors and the shame of Englishmen, we overleapt gates and barriers, and, setting at defiance repeated threats of all the terrors of law coarsely expressed to us by the custodian of the place, explored minutely the castle ruins. The other was a night among those portions of the population which outrage law and defy its terrors all the days of their lives, the tramps and thieves of London; when, under guidance and protection of[23] the most trusted officers of the two great metropolitan prisons afforded to us by Mr. Chesterton and Lieut. Tracey, we went over the worst haunts of the most dangerous classes. Nor will it be unworthy of remark, in proof that attention is not drawn vainly to such scenes, that, upon Dickens going over them a dozen years later when he wrote a paper about them for his Household Words, he found important changes effected whereby these human dens, if not less dangerous, were become certainly more decent. On the night of our earlier visit, Maclise, who accompanied us, was struck with such sickness on entering the first of the Mint lodging-houses in the borough, that he had to remain, for the time we were in them, under guardianship of the police outside. Longfellow returned home by the Great Western from Bristol on the 21st of October, enjoying as he passed through Bath the hospitality of Landor; and at the end of the following week we started on our Cornish travel.
Before we left, he was busy preparing the American Notes; and during that same time, Mr. Longfellow arrived in London and became our guest, and (for both of us, I’m happy to add) a dear friend. Longfellow's name wasn’t as well-known or loved in England back then as it is now, but he had already written several of his best works, and he had all the qualities of great company—the culture and charm that epitomize the refined and friendly American. When I was recently back in England, he reminded me of two experiences from our time together a quarter-century ago. One was a day in Rochester when we faced one of those ridiculous prohibitions that shock visitors and embarrass Englishmen; we climbed over gates and barriers, ignoring the repeated threats and crude warnings from the custodian, and thoroughly explored the castle ruins. The other was a night spent among those who consistently break the law and fear nothing—the tramps and thieves of London; guided and protected by[23] the most trusted officers from the two major metropolitan prisons provided to us by Mr. Chesterton and Lieutenant Tracey, we visited the darkest areas inhabited by the most dangerous people. It’s worth noting that when Dickens revisited these locations a dozen years later to write about them for his Household Words, he found significant changes that, while these places remained perilous, had certainly become more civilized. During our earlier visit, Maclise, who came with us, was so disturbed upon entering the first of the Mint lodging-houses in the borough that he had to stay outside under police watch for the duration of our time there. Longfellow took the Great Western railway back home from Bristol on October 21st, enjoying the hospitality of Landor as he passed through Bath; and by the end of the following week, we set off on our journey to Cornwall.
But what before this had occupied Dickens in the writing way must now be told. Not long after his reappearance amongst us, his house being still in the occupation of Sir John Wilson, he went to Broadstairs, taking with him the letters from which I have quoted so largely to help him in preparing his American Notes; and one of his first announcements to me (18th of July) shows not only this labour in progress, but the story he was under engagement to begin in November working in his mind. "The subjects at the beginning of the book are of that kind that I can't dash at them, and now and then they fret me in consequence. When I come to Washington, I am all[24] right. The solitary prison at Philadelphia is a good subject, though; I forgot that for the moment. Have you seen the Boston chapter yet? . . . I have never been in Cornwall either. A mine certainly; and a letter for that purpose shall be got from Southwood Smith. I have some notion of opening the new book in the lantern of a lighthouse!" A letter a couple of months later (16th of Sept.) recurs to that proposed opening of his story which after all he laid aside; and shows how rapidly he was getting his American Notes into shape. "At the Isle of Thanet races yesterday I saw—oh! who shall say what an immense amount of character in the way of inconceivable villainy and blackguardism! I even got some new wrinkles in the way of showmen, conjurors, pea-and-thimblers, and trampers generally. I think of opening my new book on the coast of Cornwall, in some terribly dreary iron-bound spot. I hope to have finished the American book before the end of next month; and we will then together fly down into that desolate region." Our friends having Academy engagements to detain them, we had to delay a little; and I meanwhile turn back to his letters to observe his progress with his Notes, and other employments or enjoyments of the interval. They require no illustration that they will not themselves supply: but I may remark that the then collected Poems of Tennyson had become very favourite reading with him; and that while in America Mr. Mitchell the comedian had given him a small white shaggy terrier, who bore at first the imposing name of Timber Doodle, and became a great domestic pet and companion.[25]
But what had occupied Dickens with his writing before this needs to be shared. Not long after he returned to us, while his house was still occupied by Sir John Wilson, he went to Broadstairs, taking with him the letters I've quoted extensively to assist him in preparing his American Notes; and one of his first messages to me (July 18th) shows not only that this work was in progress but also that he was already thinking about the story he was contracted to start in November. "The topics at the beginning of the book are the kind that I can't just jump into, and they occasionally bother me as a result. When I get to Washington, I’ll be all[24] set. The solitary prison in Philadelphia is a good topic, though; I momentarily forgot that. Have you seen the Boston chapter yet?... I’ve never been to Cornwall either. A mine for sure; and I’ll get a letter for that purpose from Southwood Smith. I have this idea of starting the new book in the lantern of a lighthouse!" A letter a couple of months later (September 16th) revisits that proposed beginning of his story, which ultimately he chose to set aside; and shows how quickly he was shaping his American Notes. "At the races on the Isle of Thanet yesterday, I saw—oh! who can say how much character in the way of unbelievable villainy and scoundrelism! I even picked up some new tricks in the ways of showmen, conjurors, pea-and-thimblers, and wanderers in general. I’m thinking of starting my new book on the coast of Cornwall, in some terribly dreary, iron-bound spot. I hope to finish the American book by the end of next month; and then we can fly down to that desolate area together." Our friends had Academy commitments that held them back, so we had to delay a bit; and in the meantime, I’m looking back at his letters to note his progress with his Notes and other activities or pleasures during this time. They need no further explanation that they won’t provide themselves: but I should mention that Tennyson's collected Poems had become a favorite read for him; and while in America, Mr. Mitchell the comedian had given him a small white shaggy terrier, who initially had the grand name of Timber Doodle, and became a beloved pet and companion.[25]
"I have been reading" (7th of August) "Tennyson all this morning on the seashore. Among other trifling effects, the waters have dried up as they did of old, and shown me all the mermen and mermaids, at the bottom of the ocean; together with millions of queer creatures, half-fish and half-fungus, looking down into all manner of coral caves and seaweed conservatories; and staring in with their great dull eyes at every open nook and loop-hole. Who else, too, could conjure up such a close to the extraordinary and as Landor would say 'most wonderful' series of pictures in the 'dream of fair women,' as—
"I've been reading" (August 7) "Tennyson all morning at the beach. Among other trivial effects, the waters have receded like they used to, revealing all the mermen and mermaids at the ocean's bottom, along with millions of strange creatures, half-fish and half-fungus, peering into all kinds of coral caves and seaweed gardens; and staring in with their big dull eyes at every open nook and cranny. Who else, too, could bring to life such an end to the extraordinary and, as Landor would say, 'most wonderful' series of images in the 'dream of fair women,' as—
"'Squadrons and squares of men in brazen plates,
Scaffolds, calm water surfaces, various divers' troubles,
Rows of shining ceilings with iron grills,
And quiet harems!'
"I am getting on pretty well, but it was so glittering and sunshiny yesterday that I was forced to make holiday." Four days later: "I have not written a word this blessed day. I got to New York yesterday, and think it goes as it should . . . Little doggy improves rapidly, and now jumps over my stick at the word of command. I have changed his name to Snittle Timbery, as more sonorous and expressive. He unites with the rest of the family in cordial regards and loves. Nota Bene. The Margate theatre is open every evening, and the Four Patagonians (see Goldsmith's Essays) are performing thrice a week at Ranelagh . . ."
"I’m doing pretty well, but it was so bright and sunny yesterday that I had to take a day off." Four days later: "I haven't written a single word today. I got to New York yesterday, and I think everything is going smoothly... The little dog is getting better quickly and now jumps over my stick on command. I’ve changed his name to Snittle Timbery because it sounds better and fits him more. He sends his warm regards and love to the rest of the family. Nota Bene. The Margate theater is open every evening, and the Four Patagonians (see Goldsmith's Essays) are performing three times a week at Ranelagh..."
A visit from me was at this time due, to which these were held out as inducements; and there followed what it was supposed I could not resist, a transformation into the broadest farce of a deep tragedy by a dear friend[26] of ours. "Now you really must come. Seeing only is believing, very often isn't that, and even Being the thing falls a long way short of believing it. Mrs. Nickleby herself once asked me, as you know, if I really believed there ever was such a woman; but there'll be no more belief, either in me or my descriptions, after what I have to tell of our excellent friend's tragedy, if you don't come and have it played again for yourself 'by particular desire.' We saw it last night, and oh! if you had but been with us! Young Betty, doing what the mind of man without my help never can conceive, with his legs like padded boot-trees wrapped up in faded yellow drawers, was the hero. The comic man of the company enveloped in a white sheet, with his head tied with red tape like a brief and greeted with yells of laughter whenever he appeared, was the venerable priest. A poor toothless old idiot at whom the very gallery roared with contempt when he was called a tyrant, was the remorseless and aged Creon. And Ismene being arrayed in spangled muslin trowsers very loose in the legs and very tight in the ankles, such as Fatima would wear in Blue Beard, was at her appearance immediately called upon for a song. After this, can you longer. . . ?"
A visit from me was due at this time, and these were the reasons given to entice me; what followed was something I was told I couldn’t resist—a transformation of a deep tragedy into the broadest farce by a dear friend of ours. "You really have to come. Seeing isn’t always believing, and just being involved falls far short of truly believing it. Mrs. Nickleby herself once asked me, as you know, if I really believed there ever was such a woman; but after what I have to say about our excellent friend's tragedy, I think you’ll find that there will be no more belief in me or my descriptions if you don’t come and see it performed again 'by particular desire.' We watched it last night, and oh! if only you had been there! Young Betty, doing what no man's imagination without my help could ever conceive, with his legs like padded boot trees wrapped in faded yellow shorts, was the hero. The comedic guy in the group, wrapped in a white sheet with his head tied up with red tape like a brief, received a roar of laughter every time he appeared as the old priest. A poor, toothless old fool who was met with laughter and scorn from the gallery when he was called a tyrant was the heartless aged Creon. And Ismene, dressed in sparkly loose-fitting pants tight at the ankles, just like Fatima would wear in *Blue Beard*, was immediately asked to sing as soon as she appeared. After this, can you still...?"
With the opening of September I had renewed report of his book, and of other matters. "The Philadelphia chapter I think very good, but I am sorry to say it has not made as much in print as I hoped . . . In America they have forged a letter with my signature, which they coolly declare appeared in the Chronicle with the copyright circular; and in which I express myself in such terms as you may imagine, in reference[27] to the dinners and so forth. It has been widely distributed all over the States; and the felon who invented it is a 'smart man' of course. You are to understand that it is not done as a joke, and is scurrilously reviewed. Mr. Park Benjamin begins a lucubration upon it with these capitals, Dickens is a Fool, and a Liar. . . . I have a new protégé, in the person of a wretched deaf and dumb boy whom I found upon the sands the other day, half dead, and have got (for the present) into the union infirmary at Minster. A most deplorable case."
With the start of September, I received an update about his book and other things. "I think the Philadelphia chapter is really good, but unfortunately, it hasn't made as much of an impact in print as I hoped... In America, someone forged a letter with my signature, which they casually claim was published in the Chronicle along with the copyright notice; in it, I express my thoughts in ways you can imagine regarding the dinners and so on. It's been widely circulated across the States, and the person who created it is a 'smart man,' of course. You should know that this wasn't just meant as a joke, and it's received scathing reviews. Mr. Park Benjamin starts a piece on it with the bold statement, Dickens is a fool and a liar.... I have a new protégé, a poor deaf and dumb boy I found on the beach the other day, half dead, and I’ve managed to get him (for now) into the union infirmary at Minster. It’s a truly tragic situation."
On the 14th he told me: "I have pleased myself very much to-day in the matter of Niagara. I have made the description very brief (as it should be), but I fancy it is good. I am beginning to think over the introductory chapter, and it has meanwhile occurred to me that I should like, at the beginning of the volumes, to put what follows on a blank page. I dedicate this Book to those friends of mine in America, who, loving their country, can bear the truth, when it is written good humouredly and in a kind spirit. What do you think? Do you see any objection?"
On the 14th, he told me, "I've really enjoyed working on the Niagara description today. I kept it brief (as it should be), but I think it’s solid. I’m starting to plan out the introductory chapter, and I’ve been thinking it would be nice to include this on a blank page at the start of the volumes. I dedicate this Book to my friends in America, who, loving their country, can handle the truth when it's written in a good-natured and kind way. What do you think? Do you have any objections?"
My reply is to be inferred from what he sent back on the 20th. "I don't quite see my way towards an expression in the dedication of any feeling in reference to the American reception. Of course I have always intended to glance at it, gratefully, in the end of the book; and it will have its place in the introductory chapter, if we decide for that. Would it do to put in, after 'friends in America,' who giving me a welcome I must ever gratefully and proudly remember, left my judgment free, and who, loving, &c. If so, so be it."[28]
My response can be understood from what he replied on the 20th. "I’m not sure how to express any feelings about how the book was received in America. I’ve always meant to mention it appreciatively at the end of the book, and it will be included in the introductory chapter, if we go that route. Would it be okay to add, after 'friends in America,' who gave me a welcome I will always remember with gratitude and pride, left my judgment free, and who, loving, etc. If that works, then let's do it."[28]
Before the end of the month he wrote: "For the last two or three days I have been rather slack in point of work; not being in the vein. To-day I had not written twenty lines before I rushed out (the weather being gorgeous) to bathe. And when I have done that, it is all up with me in the way of authorship until to-morrow. The little dog is in the highest spirits; and jumps, as Mr. Kenwigs would say, perpetivally. I have had letters by the Britannia from Felton, Prescott, Mr. Q, and others, all very earnest and kind. I think you will like what I have written on the poor emigrants and their ways as I literally and truly saw them on the boat from Quebec to Montreal."
Before the end of the month, he wrote: "For the last two or three days, I’ve been pretty lazy when it comes to work; I just haven’t been in the right mindset. Today, I hadn’t written more than twenty lines before I ran out (the weather is beautiful) to go for a swim. And after that, I can’t get back to writing until tomorrow. The little dog is really cheerful and jumps, as Mr. Kenwigs would say, constantly. I’ve received letters by the Britannia from Felton, Prescott, Mr. Q, and others, all very earnest and kind. I think you’ll like what I wrote about the poor emigrants and their ways, as I saw them firsthand on the boat from Quebec to Montreal."
This was a passage, which, besides being in itself as attractive as any in his writings, gives such perfect expression to a feeling that underlies them all, that I subjoin it in a note.[63] On board this Canadian steamboat[29] he encountered crowds of poor emigrants and their children; and such was their patient kindness and cheerful endurance, in circumstances where the easy-living rich could hardly fail to be monsters of impatience and selfishness, that it suggested to him a reflection than which it was not possible to have written anything more worthy of observation, or more absolutely true. Jeremy Taylor has the same philosophy in his lesson on opportunities, but here it was beautified by the example with all its fine touches. It made us read Rich and Poor by new translation.
This was a passage that, while being just as captivating as any in his writings, perfectly expresses a feeling that underpins them all, so I’m including it in a note.[63] On this Canadian steamboat[29], he met many poor emigrants and their children; their patient kindness and cheerful endurance in situations where the comfortably wealthy would likely be impatient and selfish made him reflect on something that couldn’t be more worth noting or more absolutely true. Jeremy Taylor shares a similar philosophy in his lesson on opportunities, but here it was enhanced by the example, complete with all its fine details. It made us read Rich and Poor through a new lens.
The printers were now hard at work, and in the last week of September he wrote: "I send you proofs as far as Niagara . . . I am rather holiday-making this[30] week . . . taking principal part in a regatta here yesterday, very pretty and gay indeed. We think of coming up in time for Macready's opening, when perhaps you will give us a chop; and of course you and Mac will dine with us the next day? I shall leave nothing of the book to do after coming home, please God, but the two chapters on slavery and the people which I could manage easily in a week, if need were . . . The policeman who supposed the Duke of Brunswick to be one of the swell mob, ought instantly to be made an inspector. The suspicion reflects the highest credit (I seriously think) on his penetration and judgment." Three days later: "For the last two days we have had gales blowing from the north-east, and seas rolling on us that drown the pier. To-day it is tremendous. Such a sea was never known here at this season, and it is running in at this moment in waves of twelve feet high. You would hardly know the place. But we shall be punctual to your dinner hour on Saturday. If the wind should hold in the same quarter, we may be obliged to come up by land; and in that case I should start the caravan at six in the morning. . . . What do you think of this for my title—American Notes for General Circulation; and of this motto?
The printers were busy, and in the last week of September, he wrote: "I'm sending you proofs as far as Niagara. I'm sort of on holiday this week... took part in a really nice and lively regatta here yesterday. We're thinking of coming up in time for Macready's opening; hopefully, you'll treat us to a meal, and of course, you and Mac should join us for dinner the next day? I plan to finish everything on the book after coming home, God willing, except for the two chapters on slavery and the people, which I could manage easily in a week if needed... The policeman who thought the Duke of Brunswick was part of the swell mob should definitely be promoted to inspector. I really believe that his suspicion shows great perception and judgment." Three days later: "For the past two days, we've had gales blowing from the north-east, and the seas have been so rough that they’re flooding the pier. Today is wild. Such a sea has never been seen here this time of year, and right now, it's crashing in with waves twelve feet high. You would hardly recognize the place. But we’ll be on time for your dinner on Saturday. If the wind stays the same, we might need to come up by land; if that happens, I’d leave the caravan at six in the morning... What do you think about this for my title—American Notes for General Circulation; and how about this motto?
"In reply to a question from the Bench, the Solicitor for the Bank observed, that this kind of notes circulated the most extensively, in those parts of the world where they were stolen and forged. Old Bailey Report."
"In response to a question from the judge, the Bank's Solicitor noted that this type of notes spread the most in areas of the world where they were stolen and counterfeit. Old Bailey Report."
The motto was omitted, objection being made to it; and on the last day of the month I had the last of his letters during this Broadstairs visit. "Strange as it[31] may appear to you" (25th of September), "the sea is running so high that we have no choice but to return by land. No steamer can come out of Ramsgate, and the Margate boat lay out all night on Wednesday with all her passengers on board. You may be sure of us therefore on Saturday at 5, for I have determined to leave here to-morrow, as we could not otherwise manage it in time; and have engaged an omnibus to bring the whole caravan by the overland route. . . . We cannot open a window, or a door; legs are of no use on the terrace; and the Margate boats can only take people aboard at Herne Bay!" He brought with him all that remained to be done of his second volume except the last two chapters, including that to which he has referred as "introductory;" and on the following Wednesday (5th of October) he told me that the first of these was done. "I want you very much to come and dine to-day that we may repair to Drury-lane together; and let us say half-past four, or there is no time to be comfortable. I am going out to Tottenham this morning, on a cheerless mission I would willingly have avoided. Hone, of the Every Day Book, is dying; and sent Cruikshank yesterday to beg me to go and see him, as, having read no books but mine of late, he wanted to see and shake hands with me before (as George said) 'he went.' There is no help for it, of course; so to Tottenham I repair, this morning. I worked all day, and till midnight; and finished the slavery chapter yesterday."
The motto was left out, as there was an objection to it; and on the last day of the month, I received the final letter during this visit to Broadstairs. "As strange as it may seem" (September 25th), "the sea is so rough that we have no choice but to go back by land. No steamer can leave Ramsgate, and the Margate boat stayed out all night on Wednesday with all its passengers on board. So you can count on us being there on Saturday at 5, because I’ve decided to leave here tomorrow, as we couldn't manage it any other way; I've booked a bus to bring the whole group via the overland route. We can't open a window or a door; our legs are useless on the terrace; and the Margate boats can only take people on board at Herne Bay!" He brought with him everything that was left to do on his second volume except the last two chapters, including the one he called "introductory;" and on the following Wednesday (October 5th) he told me that the first one was finished. "I really want you to come have dinner today so we can head to Drury Lane together; let’s say half-past four, or we won’t have time to be comfortable. I’m going out to Tottenham this morning on a sad mission I would have preferred to avoid. Hone, from the Every Day Book, is dying; he sent Cruikshank yesterday to ask me to visit him because he’s only read my books lately and wants to see and shake hands with me before (as George said) 'he goes.' There’s no avoiding it, of course; so I’m off to Tottenham this morning. I worked all day and until midnight; and I finished the slavery chapter yesterday."
The cheerless visit had its mournful sequel before the next month closed, when he went with the same companion to poor Hone's funeral; and one of his letters[32] written at the time to Mr. Felton has so vividly recalled to me the tragi-comedy of an incident of that day, as for long after he used to describe it, and as I have heard the other principal actor in it good-naturedly admit to be perfectly true, that two or three sentences may be given here. The wonderful neighbourhood in this life of ours, of serious and humorous things, constitutes in itself very much of the genius of Dickens's writing; the laughter close to the pathos, but never touching it with ridicule; and this small occurrence may be taken in farther evidence of its reality.
The gloomy visit had a sad aftermath before the next month ended, when he went with the same friend to poor Hone's funeral; and one of his letters[32] written at the time to Mr. Felton has brought back to me so vividly the tragicomedy of an incident from that day, as he would often describe it later, and as I have heard the other key player in it happily admit to be completely true, that I can share a couple of sentences about it here. The amazing mix of serious and funny elements in our lives is a big part of what makes Dickens's writing so special; the laughter is always close to the sadness, but never mocks it; and this small event can serve as further evidence of its authenticity.
"We went into a little parlour where the funeral party was, and God knows it was miserable enough, for the widow and children were crying bitterly in one corner, and the other mourners (mere people of ceremony, who cared no more for the dead man than the hearse did) were talking quite coolly and carelessly together in another; and the contrast was as painful and distressing as anything I ever saw. There was an independent clergyman present, with his bands on and a bible under his arm, who, as soon as we were seated, addressed C thus, in a loud emphatic voice. 'Mr. C, have you seen a paragraph respecting our departed friend, which has gone the round of the morning papers?' 'Yes, sir,' says C, 'I have:' looking very hard at me the while, for he had told me with some pride coming down that it was his composition. 'Oh!' said the clergyman. 'Then you will agree with me, Mr. C, that it is not only an insult to me, who am the servant of the Almighty, but an insult to the Almighty, whose servant I am.' 'How is that, sir?' says C. 'It is stated, Mr. C, in that paragraph,' says the minister,[33] 'that when Mr. Hone failed in business as a bookseller, he was persuaded by me to try the pulpit; which is false, incorrect, unchristian, in a manner blasphemous, and in all respects contemptible. Let us pray.' With which, and in the same breath, I give you my word, he knelt down, as we all did, and began a very miserable jumble of an extemporary prayer. I was really penetrated with sorrow for the family" (he exerted himself zealously for them afterwards, as the kind-hearted C also did), "but when C, upon his knees and sobbing for the loss of an old friend, whispered me 'that if that wasn't a clergyman, and it wasn't a funeral, he'd have punched his head,' I felt as if nothing but convulsions could possibly relieve me."
We entered a small room where the funeral gathering was taking place, and honestly, it was pretty miserable. The widow and children were crying heavily in one corner, while the other mourners—just a bunch of formalities who cared no more about the deceased than the hearse did—were chatting casually in another corner. The contrast was painfully distressing, more than anything I've ever seen. There was an independent clergyman there, wearing his robes and holding a bible, who, as soon as we sat down, turned to C and said loudly, "Mr. C, have you seen the paragraph about our departed friend that’s been circulating in the morning papers?" "Yes, sir," C replied, looking at me intently, since he had proudly told me on the way over that he wrote it. "Oh!" the clergyman exclaimed. "Then you must agree with me, Mr. C, that it is not only an insult to me, as a servant of the Almighty, but an insult to the Almighty itself, whose servant I am." "How’s that, sir?" C asked. "It says in that paragraph," the minister continued, "that when Mr. Hone went bankrupt as a bookseller, he was persuaded by me to try preaching, which is false, wrong, un-Christian, almost blasphemous, and in every way despicable. Let us pray." And just like that, I swear, he knelt down, followed by all of us, and started a really pathetic jumble of an unscripted prayer. I truly felt sorrow for the family (he worked hard for them later, just as kind-hearted C did), but when C, on his knees and sobbing over the loss of an old friend, whispered to me that if it weren't a clergyman or a funeral, he'd have punched the guy, I felt like only a fit could possibly relieve me.
On the 10th of October I heard from him that the chapter intended to be introductory to the Notes was written, and waiting our conference whether or not it should be printed. We decided against it; on his part so reluctantly, that I had to undertake for its publication when a more fitting time should come. This in my judgment has arrived, and the chapter first sees the light on this page. There is no danger at present, as there would have been when it was written, that its proper self-assertion should be mistaken for an apprehension of hostile judgments which he was anxious to deprecate or avoid. He is out of reach of all that now; and reveals to us here, as one whom fear or censure can touch no more, his honest purpose in the use of satire even where his humorous temptations were strongest. What he says will on other grounds also be read with unusual interest, for it will be found to connect itself impressively not with his first experiences[34] only, but with his second visit to America at the close of his life. He held always the same high opinion of what was best in that country, and always the same contempt for what was worst in it.
On October 10th, I heard from him that the introductory chapter to the Notes was written and waiting for us to discuss whether it should be published. We decided against it; he was so reluctant that I promised to publish it when the time was right. I believe that time has come, and the chapter is being presented here for the first time. There’s no risk now, as there would have been when it was written, that its confident expression would be mistaken for a fear of negative opinions he wanted to avoid. He’s beyond all that now; and here he shares with us, free from fear or criticism, his genuine intention in using satire, even when his humorous urges were strongest. What he says will also be read with special interest because it connects powerfully not only with his early experiences[34] but also with his second visit to America at the end of his life. He always held the same high regard for the best aspects of that country and the same disdain for its worst.
"I have placed the foregoing title at the head of this page, because I challenge and deny the right of any person to pass judgment on this book, or to arrive at any reasonable conclusion in reference to it, without first being at the trouble of becoming acquainted with its design and purpose.
"I put the title at the top of this page because I challenge and deny anyone's right to judge this book or reach any reasonable conclusion about it without first taking the time to understand its design and purpose."
"It is not statistical. Figures of arithmetic have already been heaped upon America's devoted head, almost as lavishly as figures of speech have been piled above Shakespeare's grave.
"It’s not about statistics. Numbers have already been piled on America's devoted head, almost as generously as figures of speech have been stacked above Shakespeare's grave."
"It comprehends no small talk concerning individuals, and no violation of the social confidences of private life. The very prevalent practice of kidnapping live ladies and gentlemen, forcing them into cabinets, and labelling and ticketing them whether they will or no, for the gratification of the idle and the curious, is not to my taste. Therefore I have avoided it.
"It doesn’t include small talk about people, nor does it betray the trust of private lives. The common practice of kidnapping living individuals, forcing them into cabinets, and tagging them against their will for the amusement of the idle and the curious is not something I enjoy. So, I've steered clear of it."
"It has not a grain of any political ingredient in its whole composition.
"It doesn’t have a single bit of any political element in its entire makeup."
"Neither does it contain, nor have I intended that it should contain, any lengthened and minute account of my personal reception in the United States: not because I am, or ever was, insensible to that spontaneous effusion of affection and generosity of heart, in a most affectionate and generous-hearted people; but because I conceive that it would ill become me to[35] flourish matter necessarily involving so much of my own praises, in the eyes of my unhappy readers.
"Neither does it include, nor did I mean for it to include, a detailed account of how I was received in the United States: not because I'm, or ever was, unaware of the genuine warmth and generosity of such a caring and kind-hearted people; but because I think it would be inappropriate for me to[35] highlight matters that involve so much praise of myself in front of my unfortunate readers."
"This book is simply what it claims to be—a record of the impressions I received from day to day, during my hasty travels in America, and sometimes (but not always) of the conclusions to which they, and after-reflection on them, have led me; a description of the country I passed through; of the institutions I visited; of the kind of people among whom I journeyed; and of the manners and customs that came within my observation. Very many works having just the same scope and range, have been already published, but I think that these two volumes stand in need of no apology on that account. The interest of such productions, if they have any, lies in the varying impressions made by the same novel things on different minds; and not in new discoveries or extraordinary adventures.
"This book is exactly what it claims to be—a record of the impressions I gathered day by day during my quick travels in America, and sometimes (though not always) of the conclusions I’ve reached from them and my later reflections; a description of the country I traveled through; the institutions I visited; the types of people I encountered; and the manners and customs I observed. Many works with the same focus and scope have already been published, but I believe these two volumes don’t need any apology for that. The value of such works, if they have any, lies in the different impressions that the same new experiences create in different minds, rather than in new discoveries or extraordinary adventures."
"I can scarcely be supposed to be ignorant of the hazard I run in writing of America at all. I know perfectly well that there is, in that country, a numerous class of well-intentioned persons prone to be dissatisfied with all accounts of the Republic whose citizens they are, which are not couched in terms of exalted and extravagant praise. I know perfectly well that there is in America, as in most other places laid down in maps of the great world, a numerous class of persons so tenderly and delicately constituted, that they cannot bear the truth in any form. And I do not need the gift of prophecy to discern afar off, that they who will be aptest to detect malice, ill will, and all uncharitableness in these pages, and to show, beyond any doubt,[36] that they are perfectly inconsistent with that grateful and enduring recollection which I profess to entertain of the welcome I found awaiting me beyond the Atlantic—will be certain native journalists, veracious and gentlemanly, who were at great pains to prove to me, on all occasions during my stay there, that the aforesaid welcome was utterly worthless.
"I can hardly pretend to be unaware of the risks I take in writing about America. I know very well that there is a large group of well-meaning people in that country who tend to be unhappy with any descriptions of the Republic that don't include lofty and extravagant praise. I'm fully aware that in America, as in most other places shown on maps of the world, there's a significant number of people so sensitively and delicately made that they can't handle the truth in any form. I don’t need to be a fortune teller to see that those most likely to spot malice, ill will, and unkindness in these pages, and to prove, without a doubt, that they are completely at odds with the grateful and lasting appreciation I have for the warm welcome I received across the Atlantic, will be certain local journalists—truthful and respectable—who went to great lengths to show me, at every opportunity during my visit, that said welcome was utterly worthless.[36]"
"But, venturing to dissent even from these high authorities, I formed my own opinion of its value in the outset, and retain it to this hour; and in asserting (as I invariably did on all public occasions) my liberty and freedom of speech while I was among the Americans, and in maintaining it at home, I believe that I best show my sense of the high worth of that welcome, and of the honourable singleness of purpose with which it was extended to me. From first to last I saw, in the friends who crowded round me in America, old readers, over-grateful and over-partial perhaps, to whom I had happily been the means of furnishing pleasure and entertainment; not a vulgar herd who would flatter and cajole a stranger into turning with closed eyes from all the blemishes of the nation, and into chaunting its praises with the discrimination of a street ballad-singer. From first to last I saw, in those hospitable hands, a home-made wreath of laurel; and not an iron muzzle disguised beneath a flower or two.
"But, even though I dared to disagree with these esteemed authorities, I formed my own opinion about its value from the start and still hold it to this day. In asserting (as I consistently did on all public occasions) my liberty and freedom of speech while I was in America, and defending it at home, I believe I best demonstrate my appreciation for the great significance of that warm welcome and the honorable sincerity with which it was offered to me. Throughout my time there, I recognized in the friends who gathered around me in America the old readers—perhaps overly grateful and biased—who I had fortunately been able to bring pleasure and entertainment to; not a mindless crowd looking to flatter and persuade a stranger to ignore their nation's flaws and chant its praises like a street performer. From beginning to end, I perceived in those welcoming hands a handmade laurel wreath, and not a heavy muzzle masked beneath a flower or two."
"Therefore I take—and hold myself not only justified in taking, but bound to take—the plain course of saying what I think, and noting what I saw; and as it is not my custom to exalt what in my judgment are foibles and abuses at home, so I have no intention of softening down, or glozing over, those that I have observed abroad.[37]
"Therefore, I feel not only justified in saying what I think but also obligated to do so. I will straightforwardly share what I've seen. Just as I don't tend to exaggerate what I believe are flaws and issues at home, I also won’t downplay or sugarcoat those I've noticed abroad.[37]"
"If this book should fall into the hands of any sensitive American who cannot bear to be told that the working of the institutions of his country is far from perfect; that in spite of the advantage she has over all other nations in the elastic freshness and vigour of her youth, she is far from being a model for the earth to copy; and that even in those pictures of the national manners with which he quarrels most, there is still (after the lapse of several years, each of which may be fairly supposed to have had its stride in improvement) much that is just and true at this hour; let him lay it down, now, for I shall not please him. Of the intelligent, reflecting, and educated among his countrymen, I have no fear; for I have ample reason to believe, after many delightful conversations not easily to be forgotten, that there are very few topics (if any) on which their sentiments differ materially from mine.
"If this book happens to reach any sensitive American who can't stand hearing that the workings of their country's institutions aren't perfect; that despite the advantages of youth and energy over all other nations, it isn't a model for the world to follow; and that even in the depictions of national manners they disagree with the most, there is still a lot that is just and true even now (after several years, each of which can be thought of as having made some progress), then they should stop reading it now, because I won't satisfy them. As for the thoughtful, reflective, and educated among my fellow citizens, I’m not worried; I have plenty of reason to believe, after many memorable conversations that I won't easily forget, that there are very few topics (if any) where their views differ significantly from mine."
"I may be asked—'If you have been in any respect disappointed in America, and are assured beforehand that the expression of your disappointment will give offence to any class, why do you write at all?' My answer is, that I went there expecting greater things than I found, and resolved as far as in me lay to do justice to the country, at the expense of any (in my view) mistaken or prejudiced statements that might have been made to its disparagement. Coming home with a corrected and sobered judgment, I consider myself no less bound to do justice to what, according to my best means of judgment, I found to be the truth."
"I might be asked—'If you've been disappointed in America, and you know in advance that expressing that disappointment will upset anyone, why write at all?' My answer is that I went there expecting more than I found, and I committed myself to doing justice to the country, even if it meant correcting any (in my opinion) wrong or biased statements made about it. Now that I'm back home with a clearer and more realistic perspective, I feel just as obligated to recognize the truth as I see it."
Of the book for whose opening page this matter introductory was written, it will be enough merely to add that it appeared on the 18th of October; that[38] before the close of the year four large editions had been sold; and that in my opinion it thoroughly deserved the estimate formed of it by one connected with America by the strongest social affections, and otherwise in all respects an honourable, high-minded, upright judge. "You have been very tender," wrote Lord Jeffrey, "to our sensitive friends beyond sea, and my whole heart goes along with every word you have written. I think that you have perfectly accomplished all that you profess or undertake to do, and that the world has never yet seen a more faithful, graphic, amusing, kind-hearted narrative."
Of the book for which this introductory matter was written, it's enough to say that it was published on October 18th; that[38] by the end of the year, four large editions had sold; and that, in my opinion, it absolutely deserves the praise given by someone connected to America through strong social ties and who is, in every way, an honorable, high-minded, and fair judge. "You have been very considerate," wrote Lord Jeffrey, "to our sensitive friends across the sea, and my whole heart agrees with every word you've written. I believe you have completely fulfilled everything you set out to do, and that the world has never seen a more accurate, vivid, entertaining, and kind-hearted narrative."
I permit myself so far to anticipate a later page as to print here a brief extract from one of the letters of the last American visit. Without impairing the interest with which the narrative of that time will be read in its proper place, I shall thus indicate the extent to which present impressions were modified by the experience of twenty-six years later. He is writing from Philadelphia on the fourteenth of January, 1868.
I’ll go ahead and share a short excerpt from one of the letters from my last trip to America. This won’t take away from the interest of the full story when it’s presented later, but it will show how my current impressions have changed based on my experiences from twenty-six years ago. He is writing from Philadelphia on January 14, 1868.
"I see great changes for the better, socially. Politically, no. England governed by the Marylebone vestry and the penny papers, and England as she would be after years of such governing; is what I make of that. Socially, the change in manners is remarkable. There is much greater politeness and forbearance in all ways. . . . On the other hand there are still provincial oddities wonderfully quizzical; and the newspapers are constantly expressing the popular amazement at 'Mr. Dickens's extraordinary composure.' They seem to[39] take it ill that I don't stagger on to the platform overpowered by the spectacle before me, and the national greatness. They are all so accustomed to do public things with a flourish of trumpets, that the notion of my coming in to read without somebody first flying up and delivering an 'Oration' about me, and flying down again and leading me in, is so very unaccountable to them, that sometimes they have no idea until I open my lips that it can possibly be Charles Dickens."
"I see great changes for the better in society. Politically, not so much. England is run by the Marylebone vestry and the penny papers, and it’s clear what England could look like after years of such leadership. Socially, the shift in behavior is impressive. People are much more polite and patient in every way. . . . On the flip side, there are still some regional quirks that are wonderfully amusing; and the newspapers continually express the public's astonishment at 'Mr. Dickens's extraordinary composure.' They seem to[39] think it's odd that I don’t stumble onto the platform overwhelmed by the scene in front of me and the national pride. They’re so used to public appearances being accompanied by a big show that the idea of me coming up to read without someone first stepping up to give an 'Oration' about me and leading me on is so baffling to them that sometimes they don't even realize it’s Charles Dickens until I start speaking."
CHAPTER II.
FIRST YEAR OF MARTIN CHUZZLEWIT.
1843.
The Cornish trip had come off, meanwhile, with such unexpected and continued attraction for us that we were well into the third week of absence before we turned our faces homeward. Railways helped us then not much; but where the roads were inaccessible to post-horses, we walked. Tintagel was visited, and no part of mountain or sea consecrated by the legends of Arthur was left unexplored. We ascended to the cradle of the highest tower of Mount St. Michael, and descended into several mines. Land and sea yielded each its marvels to us; but of all the impressions brought away, of which some afterwards took forms as lasting as they could receive from the most delightful art, I doubt if any were the source of such deep emotion to us all as a sunset we saw at Land's-end. Stanfield[41] knew the wonders of the Continent, the glories of Ireland were native to Maclise, I was familiar from boyhood with border and Scottish scenery, and Dickens was fresh from Niagara; but there was something in the sinking of the sun behind the Atlantic that autumn afternoon, as we viewed it together from the top of the rock projecting farthest into the sea, which each in his turn declared to have no parallel in memory.
The Cornish trip had gone so well, with an unexpected and lasting appeal for us, that we were deep into the third week of being away before we started heading home. The trains didn’t help us much, so where the roads were impassable for horses, we walked. We visited Tintagel and explored every part of the mountains and sea that were part of Arthur's legends. We climbed to the top of the highest tower on Mount St. Michael and went down into several mines. Both land and sea offered us their wonders; however, of all the memories we took with us, some later became as lasting as the best art could make them, I doubt any stirred us as deeply as the sunset we witnessed at Land’s End. Stanfield[41] had seen the wonders of the Continent, Maclise knew the glories of Ireland, I was familiar with the landscapes of the borders and Scotland since childhood, and Dickens had just come from Niagara; yet there was something about the sun setting behind the Atlantic that autumn afternoon—seen by all of us from the farthest rock sticking out into the sea—that each of us agreed had no equal in our memories.
But with the varied and overflowing gladness of those three memorable weeks it would be unworthy now to associate only the saddened recollection of the sole survivor. "Blessed star of morning!" wrote Dickens to Felton while yet the glow of its enjoyment was upon him. "Such a trip as we had into Cornwall just after Longfellow went away! . . . Sometimes we travelled all night, sometimes all day, sometimes both. . . . Heavens! If you could have seen the necks of bottles, distracting in their immense varieties of shape, peering out of the carriage pockets! If you could have witnessed the deep devotion of the post-boys, the wild attachment of the hostlers, the maniac glee of the waiters! If you could have followed us into the earthy old churches we visited, and into the strange caverns on the gloomy sea-shore, and down into the depths of mines, and up to the tops of giddy heights where the unspeakable green water was roaring, I don't know how many hundred feet below! If you could have seen but one gleam of the bright fires by which we sat in the big rooms of ancient inns at night, until long after the small hours had come and gone. . . . I never laughed in my life as I did on this journey. It would have done you good to hear me. I was choking[42] and gasping and bursting the buckle off the back of my stock, all the way. And Stanfield got into such apoplectic entanglements that we were often obliged to beat him on the back with portmanteaus before we could recover him. Seriously, I do believe there never was such a trip. And they made such sketches, those two men, in the most romantic of our halting-places, that you would have sworn we had the Spirit of Beauty with us, as well as the Spirit of Fun."[64]
But with the varied and overflowing joy of those three unforgettable weeks, it would be unfair now to only connect them with the sad memory of the lone survivor. "Blessed morning star!" Dickens wrote to Felton while he was still basking in the glow of enjoyment. "What a trip we had to Cornwall just after Longfellow left! Sometimes we traveled all night, sometimes all day, sometimes both. Heaven! If you could have seen all the different shapes of bottles peeking out of the carriage pockets! If you could have witnessed the deep devotion of the post-boys, the wild affection of the stable hands, the crazy glee of the waitstaff! If you could have joined us in the ancient churches we visited, the strange caves by the gloomy shore, the depths of mines, and up to the dizzy heights where the incredible green water was roaring hundreds of feet below! If you could have just seen one flicker of the warm fires by which we sat in the grand rooms of ancient inns at night, long after the small hours had passed... I never laughed as much in my life as I did on this journey. You would have felt great to hear me. I was choking and gasping, bursting the buckle off the back of my collar the whole way. And Stanfield got so worked up that we often had to pat his back with suitcases before we could get him to calm down. Seriously, I truly believe there has never been a trip like this. And those two guys made such sketches at our most romantic stops that you would have sworn we had the Spirit of Beauty with us, as well as the Spirit of Fun."
The Logan Stone, by Stanfield, was one of them; and it laughingly sketched both the charm of what was seen and the mirth of what was done, for it perched me on the top of the stone. It is historical, however, the ascent having been made; and of this and other examples of steadiness at heights which deterred the rest, as well as of a subject suggested for a painting of which Dickens became the unknown purchaser, Maclise reminded me in some pleasant allusions many years later, which, notwithstanding their tribute to my athletic achievements, the good-natured reader must forgive my printing. They complete the little picture of our trip. Something I had written to him of recent travel among the mountain scenery of the wilder coasts of Donegal had touched the chord of these old remembrances. "As to your clambering," he replied, "don't I know what happened of old? Don't I still see the Logan Stone, and you perched on the giddy top, while we, rocking it on its pivot, shrank from all that lay concealed[43] below! Should I ever have blundered on the waterfall of St. Wighton, if you had not piloted the way? And when we got to Land's-end, with the green sea far under us lapping into solitary rocky nooks where the mermaids live, who but you only had the courage to stretch over, to see those diamond jets of brightness that I swore then, and believe still, were the flappings of their tails! And don't I recall you again, sitting on the tip-top stone of the cradle-turret over the highest battlement of the castle of St. Michael's Mount, with not a ledge or coigne of vantage 'twixt you and the fathomless ocean under you, distant three thousand feet? Last, do I forget you clambering up the goat-path to King Arthur's castle of Tintagel, when, in my vain wish to follow, I grovelled and clung to the soil like a Caliban, and you, in the manner of a tricksy spirit and stout Ariel, actually danced up and down before me!"
The Logan Stone, by Stanfield, was one of them; and it humorously captured both the beauty of what we saw and the fun of what we did, since it had me sitting on top of the stone. It's historical, though, since the climb really happened; and about this, along with other examples of bravery at heights that scared everyone else, Maclise reminded me years later with some nice references. While they praised my athletic feats, I hope the good-natured reader forgives me for sharing them. They complete the little picture of our trip. I had mentioned something to him about my recent travels through the rugged mountain scenery of the wilder coasts of Donegal, which sparked these old memories. "As for your climbing," he replied, "don't I know what happened back then? Don't I still picture the Logan Stone, with you sitting on the dizzying top while we, rocking it on its pivot, were afraid of what lay hidden below! Would I have ever stumbled upon the waterfall of St. Wighton if you hadn’t shown me the way? And when we reached Land's End, with the green sea far below us lapping into lonely rocky nooks where the mermaids live, who but you had the guts to lean over and see those sparkling jets of light that I swore then, and still believe, were the flicks of their tails! And don’t I remember you again, sitting on the very top stone of the cradle-turret over the highest battlement of St. Michael's Mount, with not a ledge or foothold between you and the endless ocean three thousand feet below? Lastly, do I forget you climbing up the goat-path to King Arthur's castle of Tintagel, while, in my foolish wish to follow, I crawled and clung to the ground like Caliban, and you, like a mischievous spirit and brave Ariel, actually danced up and down in front of me!"
The waterfall I led him to was among the records of the famous holiday, celebrated also by Thackeray in one of his pen-and-ink pleasantries, which were sent by both painters to the next year's Academy; and so eager was Dickens to possess this landscape by Maclise which included the likeness of a member of his family, yet so anxious that our friend should be spared the sacrifice which he knew would follow an avowal of his wish, that he bought it under a feigned name before the Academy opened, and steadily refused to take back the money which on discovery of the artifice Maclise pressed upon him.[65] Our friend, who already had munificently given[44] him a charming drawing of his four eldest children to accompany him and his wife to America, had his generous way nevertheless; and as a voluntary offering four years later, painted Mrs. Dickens on a canvas of the same size as the picture of her husband in 1839.
The waterfall I took him to was part of the history of the famous holiday, which Thackeray also celebrated in one of his witty illustrations, sent by both artists to the next year's Academy. Dickens was so eager to have this landscape by Maclise that featured a family member of his, yet he was so concerned about sparing our friend from the sacrifice he knew would come with admitting his desire. So, he bought it under a fake name before the Academy opened and firmly refused to take back the money when Maclise discovered the trick and tried to give it back to him.[65] Our friend, who had already generously given him a lovely drawing of his four eldest children to accompany him and his wife to America, still had his own way of being charitable; and as a voluntary gift four years later, he painted Mrs. Dickens on a canvas the same size as her husband’s portrait from 1839.
"Behold finally the title of the new book," was the first note I had from Dickens (12th of November) after our return; "don't lose it, for I have no copy." Title and even story had been undetermined while we travelled, from the lingering wish he still had to begin it among those Cornish scenes; but this intention had now been finally abandoned, and the reader lost nothing by his substitution for the lighthouse or mine in Cornwall, of the Wiltshire-village forge on the windy autumn evening which opens the tale of Martin Chuzzlewit. Into that name he finally settled, but only after much deliberation, as a mention of his changes will show. Martin was the prefix to all, but the surname varied from its first form of Sweezleden, Sweezleback, and Sweezlewag, to those of Chuzzletoe, Chuzzleboy, Chubblewig, and Chuzzlewig; nor was Chuzzlewit chosen at last until after more hesitation and discussion. What he had sent me in his letter as finally adopted, ran thus: "The Life and Adventures of Martin Chuzzlewig, his family, friends, and enemies. Comprising all his wills and his ways. With an historical record of what he did and what he didn't. The whole forming a complete key to the house of Chuzzlewig." All which latter portion of the title was of course dropped as the work became modified, in its progress, by changes at first not contemplated; but as early as the third number he sent me the plan of "old Martin's plot to degrade and punish[45] Pecksniff," and the difficulties he encountered in departing from other portions of his scheme were such as to render him, in his subsequent stories, more bent upon constructive care at the outset, and adherence as far as might be to any design he had formed.
"Finally, here's the title of the new book," was the first message I received from Dickens (November 12th) after we got back; "don't lose it, because I don't have a copy." The title and even the storyline were still undecided while we were traveling, due to his lingering desire to start it among those Cornish landscapes; however, that plan had now been completely dropped, and the reader didn't miss anything by replacing the lighthouse or my experience in Cornwall with the village forge in Wiltshire on the windy autumn evening that opens the tale of Martin Chuzzlewit. He ultimately settled on that name after much thought, as a record of his changes will reveal. Martin was the consistent first name, but the last name changed from its initial forms of Sweezleden, Sweezleback, and Sweezlewag, to Chuzzletoe, Chuzzleboy, Chubblewig, and Chuzzlewig; Chuzzlewit wasn't chosen until after even more hesitation and discussion. What he sent me in his letter as finally adopted was this: "The Life and Adventures of Martin Chuzzlewig, his family, friends, and enemies. Covering all his wills and his ways. With a historical record of what he did and what he didn't. The whole forming a complete key to the house of Chuzzlewig." Naturally, the latter part of the title was eventually dropped as the work evolved, influenced by changes he hadn't initially anticipated; but as early as the third installment, he sent me the plan for "old Martin's plot to degrade and punish[45] Pecksniff," and the challenges he faced in veering away from other parts of his scheme were significant enough to make him, in his later stories, more focused on careful construction from the beginning, and sticking as closely as possible to any plans he had created.
The first number, which appeared in January 1843, had not been quite finished when he wrote to me on the 8th of December: "The Chuzzlewit copy makes so much more than I supposed, that the number is nearly done. Thank God!" Beginning so hurriedly as at last he did, altering his course at the opening and seeing little as yet of the main track of his design, perhaps no story was ever begun by him with stronger heart or confidence. Illness kept me to my rooms for some days, and he was so eager to try the effect of Pecksniff and Pinch that he came down with the ink hardly dry on the last slip to read the manuscript to me. Well did Sydney Smith, in writing to say how very much the number had pleased him, foresee the promise there was in those characters. "Pecksniff and his daughters, and Pinch, are admirable—quite first-rate painting, such as no one but yourself can execute!" And let me here at once remark that the notion of taking Pecksniff for a type of character was really the origin of the book; the design being to show, more or less by every person introduced, the number and variety of humours and vices that have their root in selfishness.
The first issue, which came out in January 1843, wasn’t completely finished when he wrote to me on December 8th: "The Chuzzlewit copy makes so much more than I thought, that the issue is almost done. Thank God!" Starting off so quickly as he eventually did, changing his approach at the beginning and having little yet of the overall plan of his design, maybe no story was ever started by him with such strong determination or confidence. I was stuck in my rooms for a few days because of illness, and he was so eager to see how Pecksniff and Pinch would turn out that he came down to read the manuscript to me with the ink barely dry on the last page. Sydney Smith, in his letter saying how much he enjoyed the issue, correctly predicted the potential in those characters. "Pecksniff and his daughters, and Pinch, are fantastic—truly top-tier writing, the kind that only you can pull off!" And let me point out that the idea of using Pecksniff as a character type was really the starting point of the book; the goal being to illustrate, through each character introduced, the various humors and vices that stem from selfishness.
Another piece of his writing that claims mention at the close of 1842 was a prologue contributed to the Patrician's Daughter, Mr. Westland Marston's first dramatic effort, which had attracted him by the beauty[46] of its composition less than by the courage with which its subject had been chosen from the actual life of the time.
Another piece of his writing worth mentioning at the end of 1842 was a prologue he contributed to the Patrician's Daughter, Mr. Westland Marston's first play, which caught his attention more for the beauty of its writing than for the bravery shown in choosing a subject drawn from contemporary life. [46]
"You are the actors, and your homes are the stage."
This was the date, too, of Mr. Browning's tragedy of the Blot on the 'Scutcheon, which I took upon myself, after reading it in the manuscript, privately to impart to Dickens; and I was not mistaken in the belief that it would profoundly touch him. "Browning's play," he wrote (25th of November), "has thrown me into a perfect passion of sorrow. To say that there is anything in its subject save what is lovely, true, deeply affecting, full of the best emotion, the most earnest feeling, and the most true and tender source of interest, is to say that there is no light in the sun, and no heat in blood. It is full of genius, natural and great thoughts, profound and yet simple and beautiful in its vigour. I know nothing that is so affecting, nothing in any book I have ever read, as Mildred's recurrence to that 'I was so young—I had no mother.' I know no love like it, no passion like it, no moulding of a splendid thing after its conception, like it. And I swear it is a tragedy that must be played; and must be played, moreover, by Macready. There are some things I would have changed if I could (they are very slight, mostly broken lines); and I assuredly would have the old servant begin his tale upon the scene; and be taken by the throat, or drawn upon, by his master, in its commencement. But the tragedy I never shall forget, or less vividly remember than I do now. And if you tell Browning that I have seen it, tell him that[47] I believe from my soul there is no man living (and not many dead) who could produce such a work.—Macready likes the altered prologue very much." . . . There will come a more convenient time to speak of his general literary likings, or special regard for contemporary books; but I will say now that nothing interested him more than successes won honestly in his own field, and that in his large and open nature there was no hiding-place for little jealousies. An instance occurs to me which may be named at once, when, many years after the present date, he called my attention very earnestly to two tales then in course of publication in Blackwood's Magazine, and afterwards collected under the title of Scenes of Clerical Life. "Do read them," he wrote. "They are the best things I have seen since I began my course."
This was also the date of Mr. Browning's tragedy, Blot on the 'Scutcheon, which I took upon myself to share with Dickens after reading it in manuscript form, convinced it would deeply move him. "Browning's play," he wrote on November 25th, "has plunged me into a complete whirlwind of sorrow. To say there's anything in its subject other than lovely, true, deeply moving, full of the best emotions, the most earnest feelings, and the most genuine and tender source of interest is like saying there's no light in the sun and no warmth in blood. It’s filled with genius, natural and profound thoughts that are simple yet beautiful in their intensity. I know nothing so moving, nothing in any book I've ever read, as Mildred’s line, 'I was so young—I had no mother.' I know no love like this, no passion like this, no refinement of a magnificent thing after its conception like it. And I swear it is a tragedy that must be performed; and it must be performed by Macready. There are a few things I would have changed if I could (they're very minor, mostly broken lines); and I would definitely have the old servant begin his tale on stage; and have his master grab him by the throat or confront him at the start. But I will never forget this tragedy, nor will I remember it any less vividly than I do now. And if you tell Browning I've seen it, tell him that[47] I truly believe there’s no living man (and not many dead) who could create such a work.—Macready really likes the revised prologue." . . . There will come a more appropriate time to discuss his overall literary preferences or special fondness for contemporary books; but I’ll say now that nothing thrilled him more than successes achieved honestly in his own arena, and in his expansive and open nature, there was no room for petty jealousies. One instance comes to mind that I can mention right away, when, many years later, he earnestly drew my attention to two stories that were being published in Blackwood's Magazine, later collected under the title Scenes of Clerical Life. "Do read them," he wrote. "They are the best things I've seen since I started my journey."

Eighteen hundred and forty-three[66] opened with the most vigorous prosecution of his Chuzzlewit labour. "I hope the number will be very good," he wrote to me of number two (8th of January). "I have been hammering away, and at home all day. Ditto yesterday;[48] except for two hours in the afternoon, when I ploughed through snow half a foot deep, round about the wilds of Willesden." For the present, however, I shall glance only briefly from time to time at his progress with the earlier portions of the story on which he was thus engaged until the midsummer of 1844. Disappointments arose in connection with it, unexpected and strange, which had important influence upon him: but, I reserve the mention of these for awhile, that I may speak of the leading incidents of 1843.
Eighteen hundred and forty-three[66] started with the most intense work on his Chuzzlewit project. "I hope the second issue will be really good," he wrote to me about number two (January 8th). "I've been working hard, staying home all day. Same goes for yesterday;[48] except for two hours in the afternoon when I trudged through half a foot of snow around the outskirts of Willesden." For now, though, I’ll only briefly look at his progress with the earlier parts of the story he was working on until the summer of 1844. Unexpected and strange disappointments came up regarding it, which had a significant impact on him: but I’ll hold off on mentioning those for a bit so I can discuss the main events of 1843.
"I am in a difficulty," he wrote (12th of February), "and am coming down to you some time to-day or to-night. I couldn't write a line yesterday; not a word, though I really tried hard. In a kind of despair I started off at half-past two with my pair of petticoats to Richmond; and dined there!! Oh what a lovely day it was in those parts." His pair of petticoats were Mrs. Dickens and her sister Georgina: the latter, since his return from America, having become part of his household, of which she remained a member until his death; and he had just reason to be proud of the steadiness, depth, and devotion of her friendship. In a note-book begun by him in January 1855, where, for the first time in his life, he jotted down hints and fancies proposed to be made available in future writings, I find a character sketched of which, if the whole was not suggested by his sister-in-law, the most part was applicable to her. "She—sacrificed to children, and sufficiently rewarded. From a child herself, always 'the children' (of somebody else) to engross her. And so it comes to pass that she is never married;[49] never herself has a child; is always devoted 'to the children' (of somebody else); and they love her; and she has always youth dependent on her till her death—and dies quite happily." Not many days after that holiday at Richmond, a slight unstudied outline in pencil was made by Maclise of the three who formed the party there, as we all sat together; and never did a touch so light carry with it more truth of observation. The likenesses of all are excellent; and I here preserve the drawing because nothing ever done of Dickens himself has conveyed more vividly his look and bearing at this yet youthful time. He is in his most pleasing aspect; flattered, if you will; but nothing that is known to me gives a general impression so life-like and true of the then frank, eager, handsome face.
"I'm in a bit of a bind," he wrote (February 12th), "and I’ll be coming down to see you sometime today or tonight. I couldn't write a single word yesterday; not a line, even though I really tried hard. In a kind of despair, I left at 2:30 with my two companions to Richmond, and I had dinner there!! Oh, what a beautiful day it was in that area." His companions were Mrs. Dickens and her sister Georgina; the latter had joined his household upon his return from America and remained a member until his death. He had every reason to be proud of the consistency, depth, and loyalty of her friendship. In a notebook he started in January 1855, where for the first time in his life he jotted down ideas and inspirations meant for future writings, I find a character sketch that, while not entirely based on his sister-in-law, closely resembles her. "She—sacrificed for children and was adequately rewarded. Forever youthful, always 'the children' (of someone else) to occupy her time. Thus, she remains unmarried; never has a child of her own; is always devoted 'to the children' (of someone else); and they love her; she always has youth relying on her until her death—and dies happily." Just a few days after that holiday in Richmond, Maclise made a quick, casual pencil sketch of the three of them as we all sat together, and never has such a light touch conveyed more genuine observation. The likenesses of all are impressive; I’m keeping the drawing here because nothing else done of Dickens captures more vividly his look and demeanor during this still youthful time. He appears at his most charming; flattered, if you want to say so, but nothing I know gives such a life-like and accurate impression of his then open, eager, handsome face.
It was a year of much illness with me, which had ever-helpful and active sympathy from him. "Send me word how you are," he wrote, two days later. "But not so much for that I now write, as to tell you, peremptorily, that I insist on your wrapping yourself up and coming here in a hackney-coach, with a big portmanteau, to-morrow. It surely is better to be unwell with a Quick and Cheerful (and Co) in the neighbourhood, than in the dreary vastness of Lincoln's-inn-fields. Here is the snuggest tent-bedstead in the world, and there you are with the drawing-room for your workshop, the Q and C for your pal, and 'every-think in a concatenation accordingly.' I begin to have hopes of the regeneration of mankind after the reception of Gregory last night, though I have none of the Chronicle for not denouncing the villain. Have[50] you seen the note touching my Notes in the blue and yellow?"
I had a year full of sickness, but he was always there with his supportive and active sympathy. "Let me know how you are," he wrote two days later. "But I’m not writing just for that; I’m telling you, firmly, that you need to bundle up and come here in a cab tomorrow with a big suitcase. It’s definitely better to be unwell with a Quick and Cheerful (and Co) nearby than stuck in the gloomy emptiness of Lincoln's Inn Fields. I have the coziest bed in the world here, and you’ll have the drawing room as your workspace, the Q and C as your buddy, and everything else falling into place. After the reception of Gregory last night, I’m starting to feel hopeful about the future of humanity, even though I have no support from the Chronicle for not calling out the villain. Have[50] you seen the note about my Notes in the blue and yellow?"
The first of these closing allusions was to the editor of the infamous Satirist having been hissed from the Drury-lane stage, on which he had presented himself in the character of Hamlet; and I remember with what infinite pleasure I afterwards heard Chief Justice Tindal in court, charging the jury in an action brought by this malefactor against a publican of St. Giles's for having paid men to take part in the hissing of him, avow the pride he felt in "living in the same parish with a man of that humble station of life of the defendant's," who was capable of paying money out of his own pocket to punish what he believed to be an outrage to decency. The second allusion was to a statement of the reviewer of the American Notes in the Edinburgh to the effect, that, if he had been rightly informed, Dickens had gone to America as a kind of missionary in the cause of international copyright; to which a prompt contradiction had been given in the Times. "I deny it," wrote Dickens, "wholly. He is wrongly informed; and reports, without enquiry, a piece of information which I could only characterize by using one of the shortest and strongest words in the language."
The first of these references was to the editor of the notorious Satirist, who was booed off the stage at Drury Lane after performing as Hamlet. I remember the immense satisfaction I felt when I later heard Chief Justice Tindal in court, addressing the jury in a case brought by this wrongdoer against a pub owner in St. Giles's for paying people to participate in the booing. He expressed pride in "living in the same neighborhood as a man of the humble position of the defendant," who was willing to spend his own money to punish what he considered a violation of decency. The second reference was to a statement from the reviewer of the American Notes in the Edinburgh, claiming that, if accurately informed, Dickens had gone to America as a sort of missionary for international copyright. This was quickly contradicted in the Times. "I deny it," wrote Dickens, "completely. He is misinformed and reports, without investigation, something I can only describe using one of the simplest and most direct words in the language."
The disputes that had arisen out of the American book, I may add, stretched over great part of the year. It will quite suffice, however, to say here that the ground taken by him in his letters written on the spot, and printed in my former volume, which in all the more material statements his book invited public judgment upon and which he was moved to reopen in Chuzzlewit, was so kept by him against all comers, that[51] none of the counter-statements or arguments dislodged him from a square inch of it. But the controversy is dead now; and he took occasion, on his later visit to America, to write its epitaph.
The disputes that came up from the American book lasted for a significant part of the year. However, it’s enough to say here that the standpoint he presented in his letters written on the ground and published in my earlier volume, which invited public opinion on all the key points, and which he chose to revisit in Chuzzlewit, was firmly defended by him against all challengers, so that[51] none of the opposing arguments moved him an inch. But the controversy is over now; and during his later visit to America, he took the opportunity to write its epitaph.
Though I did not, to revert to his February letter, obey its cordial bidding by immediately taking up quarters with him, I soon after joined him at a cottage he rented in Finchley; and here, walking and talking in the green lanes as the midsummer months were coming on, his introduction of Mrs. Gamp, and the uses to which he should apply that remarkable personage, first occurred to him. In his preface to the book he speaks of her as a fair representation, at the time it was published, of the hired attendant on the poor in sickness: but he might have added that the rich were no better off, for Mrs. Gamp's original was in reality a person hired by a most distinguished friend of his own, a lady, to take charge of an invalid very dear to her; and the common habit of this nurse in the sick room, among other Gampish peculiarities, was to rub her nose along the top of the tall fender. Whether or not, on that first mention of her, I had any doubts whether such a character could be made a central figure in his story, I do not now remember; but if there were any at the time, they did not outlive the contents of the packet which introduced her to me in the flesh a few weeks after our return. "Tell me," he wrote from Yorkshire, where he had been meanwhile passing pleasant holiday with a friend, "what you think of Mrs. Gamp? You'll not find it easy to get through the hundreds of misprints in her conversation, but I want your opinion at once. I think you[52] know already something of mine. I mean to make a mark with her." The same letter enclosed me a clever and pointed little parable in verse which he had written for an annual edited by Lady Blessington.[67]
Though I didn’t follow his friendly suggestion in his February letter to immediately move in with him, I soon joined him at a cottage he rented in Finchley. We spent our time walking and talking in the green lanes as summer approached, and that’s when he first thought of introducing Mrs. Gamp and how he intended to use that interesting character. In his book's preface, he describes her as a true representation of hired help for the sick at the time it was published. But he could have mentioned that the wealthy weren’t any better off, since Mrs. Gamp was based on a real person hired by a notable friend of his, a lady, to care for someone very dear to her. One of this nurse's odd habits in the sick room was to rub her nose along the top of the tall fender. I can’t remember if I had any doubts about whether such a character could be the main focus of his story when he first mentioned her, but if I did, they didn’t last long after I received the packet that introduced her to me in person a few weeks after we returned. “Tell me,” he wrote from Yorkshire, where he was enjoying a pleasant holiday with a friend, “what do you think of Mrs. Gamp? You won’t find it easy to get through the hundreds of misprints in her conversation, but I want your opinion right away. I think you already know something of mine. I plan to make a mark with her.” The same letter also included a clever and pointed little poem he wrote for an annual edited by Lady Blessington.[67]
Another allusion in the February letter reminds me of the interest which his old work for the Chronicle gave him in everything affecting its credit, and that this was the year when Mr. John Black ceased to be its editor, in circumstances reviving strongly all Dickens's sympathies. "I am deeply grieved" (3rd of May, 1843) "about Black. Sorry from my heart's core. If I could find him out, I would go and comfort him this moment." He did find him out; and he and a certain number of us did also comfort this excellent man after a fashion extremely English, by giving him a Greenwich dinner on the 20th of May; when Dickens had arranged and ordered all to perfection, and the dinner succeeded in its purpose, as in other ways, quite wonderfully. Among the entertainers were Sheil and Thackeray, Fonblanque and Charles Buller, Southwood Smith and William Johnson Fox, Macready and Maclise, as well as myself and Dickens.
Another reference in the February letter reminds me of the interest his past work for the Chronicle sparked in everything related to its reputation, and this was the year Mr. John Black stopped being its editor, under circumstances that strongly reignited all of Dickens's sympathies. "I am deeply saddened" (May 3, 1843) "about Black. Truly sorry from the bottom of my heart. If I could find him, I would go comfort him right now." He did find him; and he and a few of us also comforted this great man in a very English way by treating him to a dinner in Greenwich on May 20th; Dickens organized everything perfectly, and the dinner was a resounding success in achieving its purpose, among other things, quite remarkably. Among the hosts were Sheil and Thackeray, Fonblanque and Charles Buller, Southwood Smith and William Johnson Fox, Macready and Maclise, along with myself and Dickens.
There followed another similar celebration, in which one of these entertainers was the guest and which owed hardly less to Dickens's exertions, when, at the Star-and-garter at Richmond in the autumn, we wished Macready good-speed on his way to America. Dickens took the chair at that dinner; and with Stanfield,[54] Maclise, and myself, was in the following week to have accompanied the great actor to Liverpool to say good-bye to him on board the Cunard ship, and bring his wife back to London after their leave-taking; when a word from our excellent friend Captain Marryat, startling to all of us except Dickens himself, struck him out of our party. Marryat thought that Macready might suffer in the States by any public mention of his having been attended on his way by the author of the American Notes and Martin Chuzzlewit, and our friend at once agreed with him. "Your main and foremost reason," he wrote to me, "for doubting Marryat's judgment, I can at once destroy. It has occurred to me many times; I have mentioned the thing to Kate more than once; and I had intended not to go on board, charging Radley to let nothing be said of my being in his house. I have been prevented from giving any expression to my fears by a misgiving that I should seem to attach, if I did so, too much importance to my own doings. But now that I have Marryat at my back, I have not the least hesitation in saying that I am certain he is right. I have very great apprehensions that the Nickleby dedication will damage Macready. Marryat is wrong in supposing it is not printed in the American editions, for I have myself seen it in the shop windows of several cities. If I were to go on board with him, I have not the least doubt that the fact would be placarded all over New York, before he had shaved himself in Boston. And that there are thousands of men in America who would pick a quarrel with him on the mere statement of his being my friend, I have no more doubt than I have[55] of my existence. You have only doubted Marryat because it is impossible for any man to know what they are in their own country, who has not seen them there."
There was another similar celebration, where one of the entertainers was the guest, which was largely thanks to Dickens's efforts. In the autumn, at the Star-and-Garter in Richmond, we wished Macready well on his journey to America. Dickens chaired that dinner; and with Stanfield,[54] Maclise, and me, he was supposed to accompany the great actor to Liverpool the following week to say goodbye to him on the Cunard ship and to bring his wife back to London after their farewell. However, a word from our good friend Captain Marryat, which surprised all of us except Dickens, removed him from our group. Marryat believed that Macready might face issues in the States if it became publicly known that he had been accompanied by the author of the American Notes and Martin Chuzzlewit, and our friend immediately agreed. "Your primary reason," he wrote to me, "for doubting Marryat's judgment, I can easily refute. I've thought about this many times; I've mentioned it to Kate more than once; and I intended not to go on board, telling Radley to keep my presence in his house a secret. I held back from expressing my concerns because I was worried it would seem like I was giving too much importance to my own actions. But now that I have Marryat's support, I have no hesitation in saying that I'm sure he’s right. I'm really worried that the Nickleby dedication will harm Macready. Marryat is mistaken in thinking it’s not printed in the American editions because I've actually seen it in the shop windows of several cities. If I went on board with him, I'm certain that the fact would be splashed all over New York before he even got a chance to shave in Boston. And I have no doubt that there are thousands of people in America who would want to pick a fight with him just because he’s my friend, as sure as I am[55] of my own existence. You only question Marryat because it’s impossible for anyone to know how things are in their own country unless they’ve seen it for themselves."
This letter was written from Broadstairs, whither he had gone in August, after such help as he only could give, and never took such delight as in giving, to a work of practical humanity. Earlier in the year he had presided at a dinner for the Printers' Pension-fund, which Thomas Hood, Douglas Jerrold, and myself attended with him; and upon the terrible summer-evening accident at sea by which Mr. Elton the actor lost his life, it was mainly by Dickens's unremitting exertions, seconded admirably by Mr. Serle and warmly taken up by Mr. Elton's own profession (the most generous in the world), that ample provision was made for the many children. At the close of August I had news of him from his favourite watering-place, too characteristic to be omitted. The day before had been a day of "terrific heat," yet this had not deterred him from doing what he was too often suddenly prone to do in the midst of his hardest work. "I performed an insane match against time of eighteen miles by the milestones in four hours and a half, under a burning sun the whole way. I could get" (he is writing next morning) "no sleep at night, and really began to be afraid I was going to have a fever. You may judge in what kind of authorship-training I am to-day. I could as soon eat the cliff as write about anything." A few days later, however, all was well again; and another sketch from himself, to his American friend, will show his sea-side life in ordinary. "In a bay-window in a[56] one-pair sits, from nine o'clock to one, a gentleman with rather long hair and no neckcloth, who writes and grins as if he thought he were very funny indeed. At one he disappears, presently emerges from a bathing-machine, and may be seen, a kind of salmon-coloured porpoise, splashing about in the ocean. After that he may be viewed in another bay-window on the ground floor, eating a strong lunch; and after that, walking a dozen miles or so, or lying on his back in the sand reading a book. Nobody bothers him unless they know he is disposed to be talked to; and I am told he is very comfortable indeed. He's as brown as a berry, and they do say is a small fortune to the innkeeper who sells beer and cold punch. But this is mere rumour. Sometimes he goes up to London (eighty miles or so away), and then I'm told there is a sound in Lincoln's-inn-fields at night, as of men laughing, together with a clinking of knives and forks and wine-glasses."[68]
This letter was written from Broadstairs, where he had gone in August, after providing all the help he could, and he took great joy in doing so, for a cause of practical humanity. Earlier in the year, he had hosted a dinner for the Printers' Pension Fund, which Thomas Hood, Douglas Jerrold, and I attended with him. After the tragic summer evening accident at sea that took the life of Mr. Elton, the actor, it was largely thanks to Dickens's tireless efforts, brilliantly supported by Mr. Serle and warmly embraced by Mr. Elton's own profession (the most generous in the world), that substantial support was arranged for the many children. At the end of August, I heard from him at his favorite seaside spot, which was too characteristic to leave out. The day before had been “incredibly hot,” yet this didn’t stop him from doing what he often impulsively did in the middle of his hardest work. “I took on a crazy race against the clock, covering eighteen miles by the milestones in four and a half hours, under a blazing sun the whole way. I could get” (he writes the next morning) “no sleep at night and honestly started to fear I was going to get a fever. You can imagine what kind of writing training I’m going through today. I could as soon eat the cliff as write about anything.” A few days later, though, all was well again; and another note from him to his American friend will illustrate his typical seaside life. “In a bay window on the first floor sits, from nine o'clock to one, a guy with rather long hair and no necktie, who writes and grins like he thinks he's really funny. At one he disappears, then comes out of a bathing machine, and you can see him, like a kind of salmon-colored porpoise, splashing around in the ocean. After that, you can find him in another bay window on the ground floor, having a hearty lunch. Then he walks ten miles or so, or lies on his back in the sand reading a book. Nobody bothers him unless they know he’s open to chatting; and I've been told he is pretty comfortable. He’s as brown as a berry, and they say he brings in a small fortune for the innkeeper who serves beer and cold punch. But that’s just hearsay. Sometimes he goes up to London (about eighty miles away), and then I'm told there's laughter in Lincoln's Inn Fields at night, along with the clinking of knives, forks, and wine glasses.”[68]
He returned to town "for good" on Monday the 2nd of October, and from the Wednesday to the Friday of that week was at Manchester, presiding at the opening of its great Athenæum, when Mr. Cobden and Mr. Disraeli also "assisted." Here he spoke mainly on a matter always nearest his heart, the education of the very poor. He protested against the danger of calling a little learning dangerous; declared his preference for the very least of the little over none at all; proposed to substitute for the old a new doggerel,
He returned to town "for good" on Monday, October 2nd, and from Wednesday to Friday of that week, he was in Manchester, leading the opening of its grand Athenæum, where Mr. Cobden and Mr. Disraeli also participated. Here, he primarily spoke about a topic that was always close to his heart: the education of the very poor. He argued against the idea that a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, expressed his preference for the smallest amount of knowledge over none at all, and suggested replacing the old with a new version of doggerel.
The same spirit impelled him to give eager welcome to the remarkable institution of Ragged schools, which, begun by a shoemaker of Southampton and a chimney-sweep of Windsor and carried on by a peer of the realm, has had results of incalculable importance to society. The year of which I am writing was its first, as this in which I write is its last; and in the interval, out of three hundred thousand children to whom it has given some sort of education, it is computed also to have given to a third of that number the means of honest employment.[69] "I sent Miss Coutts," he had[58] written (24th of September), "a sledge hammer account of the Ragged schools; and as I saw her name for two hundred pounds in the clergy education subscription-list, took pains to show her that religious mysteries and difficult creeds wouldn't do for such pupils. I told her, too, that it was of immense importance they should be washed. She writes back to know what the rent of some large airy premises would be, and what the expense of erecting a regular bathing or purifying place; touching which points I am in correspondence with the authorities. I have no doubt she will do whatever I ask her in the matter. She is a most excellent creature, I protest to God, and I have a most perfect affection and respect for her."
The same enthusiasm drove him to warmly embrace the incredible idea of Ragged schools, which started with a shoemaker from Southampton and a chimney sweep from Windsor and was supported by a nobleman. This initiative has brought invaluable benefits to society. The year I’m writing about was its first, just as this year is its last; and in between, it’s estimated to have provided some form of education to three hundred thousand children and helped a third of them find honest work.[69] "I sent Miss Coutts," he wrote on September 24th, "a thorough report on the Ragged schools; and since I saw her name next to two hundred pounds in the clergy education subscription list, I made sure to explain to her that religious mysteries and complex doctrines wouldn’t be suitable for these students. I also mentioned that it was crucial for them to be washed. She replied asking about the rent for some spacious, well-ventilated premises and the cost of building a proper bathing or cleansing facility; I’m currently in touch with the authorities about these matters. I’m confident she’ll do whatever I ask her regarding this. She is an absolutely wonderful person, I swear to God, and I hold her in the highest affection and respect."
One of the last things he did at the close of the year, in the like spirit, was to offer to describe the Ragged schools for the Edinburgh Review. "I have told Napier," he wrote to me, "I will give a description of them in a paper on education, if the Review is not[59] afraid to take ground against the church catechism and other mere formularies and subtleties, in reference to the education of the young and ignorant. I fear it is extremely improbable it will consent to commit itself so far." His fears were well-founded; but the statements then made by him give me opportunity to add that it was his impatience of differences on this point with clergymen of the Established Church that had led him, for the past year or two, to take sittings in the Little Portland-street Unitarian chapel; for whose officiating minister, Mr. Edward Tagart, he had a friendly regard which continued long after he had ceased to be a member of his congregation. That he did so quit it, after two or three years, I can distinctly state; and of the frequent agitation of his mind and thoughts in connection with this all-important theme, there will be other occasions to speak. But upon essential points he had never any sympathy so strong as with the leading doctrine and discipline of the Church of England; to these, as time went on, he found himself able to accommodate all minor differences; and the unswerving faith in Christianity itself, apart from sects and schisms, which had never failed him at any period of his life, found expression at its close in the language of his will. Twelve months before his death, these words were written. "I direct that my name be inscribed in plain English letters on my tomb . . . I conjure my friends on no account to make me the subject of any monument, memorial, or testimonial whatever. I rest my claim to the remembrance of my country on my published works, and to the remembrance of my friends upon their experience of me in addition thereto.[60] I commit my soul to the mercy of God, through our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ; and I exhort my dear children humbly to try to guide themselves by the teaching of the New Testament in its broad spirit, and to put no faith in any man's narrow construction of its letter here or there."
One of the last things he did at the end of the year, in a similar spirit, was to offer to describe the Ragged schools for the Edinburgh Review. "I told Napier," he wrote to me, "that I will provide a description of them in a paper on education, if the Review is not[59] afraid to take a stand against the church catechism and other mere formulas and subtleties when it comes to educating the young and uninformed. I fear it is very unlikely that it will agree to go that far." His concerns were justified; but his statements then give me a chance to mention that his impatience with differing views on this issue with clergymen of the Established Church led him, for the past couple of years, to attend services at the Little Portland-street Unitarian chapel; for whose officiating minister, Mr. Edward Tagart, he had a friendly regard that lasted long after he stopped being a member of his congregation. I can clearly say that he left it after two or three years; and there will be other times to discuss the frequent turmoil of his mind and thoughts concerning this crucial topic. But on essential points, he never had a sympathy as strong as with the main doctrine and practices of the Church of England; as time went on, he found he could accommodate all minor differences with these beliefs; and the unwavering faith in Christianity itself, apart from denominations and divisions, which had never failed him at any point in his life, found expression at the end in the words of his will. Twelve months before his death, he wrote these words: "I instruct that my name be inscribed in plain English letters on my tomb . . . I urge my friends not to make me the subject of any monument, memorial, or testimonial of any kind. I rest my claim to the remembrance of my country on my published works, and to the remembrance of my friends upon their experiences with me in addition to that.[60] I entrust my soul to the mercy of God, through our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ; and I urge my dear children to humbly try to guide themselves by the teaching of the New Testament in its broad spirit, and to put no faith in any man's narrow interpretation of its text here or there."
Active as he had been in the now ending year, and great as were its varieties of employment; his genius in its highest mood, his energy unwearied in good work, and his capacity for enjoyment without limit; he was able to signalize its closing months by an achievement supremely fortunate, which but for disappointments the year had also brought might never have been thought of. He had not begun until a week after his return from Manchester, where the fancy first occurred to him, and before the end of November he had finished, his memorable Christmas Carol. It was the work of such odd moments of leisure as were left him out of the time taken up by two numbers of his Chuzzlewit; and though begun with but the special design of adding something to the Chuzzlewit balance, I can testify to the accuracy of his own account of what befell him in its composition, with what a strange mastery it seized him for itself, how he wept over it, and laughed, and wept again, and excited himself to an extraordinary degree, and how he walked thinking of it fifteen and twenty miles about the black streets of London, many and many a night after all sober folks had gone to bed. And when it was done, as he told our friend Mr. Felton in America, he let himself loose like a madman. "Forster is out again," he added, by way of illustrating our practical[61] comments on his celebration of the jovial old season, "and if he don't go in again after the manner in which we have been keeping Christmas, he must be very strong indeed. Such dinings, such dancings, such conjurings, such blind-man's-buffings, such theatre-goings, such kissings-out of old years and kissings-in of new ones, never took place in these parts before."
Active as he had been in the year that was coming to an end, and with the many different tasks he had taken on; his creativity at its peak, his energy tireless in doing good work, and his ability to enjoy life without limits; he marked the final months of the year with an incredibly fortunate accomplishment, which he might never have considered without the disappointments the year also brought. He didn’t start until a week after getting back from Manchester, where the idea first came to him, and by the end of November, he had completed his memorable Christmas Carol. It was crafted during the odd moments of free time he had left after working on two installments of his Chuzzlewit; and although it began with the specific intention of adding something to the Chuzzlewit collection, I can confirm that his own account of what happened during its creation is accurate, how it took hold of him in a strange way, how he cried over it, laughed, cried again, got extremely excited about it, and how he walked, thinking about it, fifteen or twenty miles through the dark streets of London, many nights after all the sensible people had gone to bed. And when it was done, as he told our friend Mr. Felton in America, he let himself go like a madman. "Forster is out again," he added, to illustrate our practical [61] comments on his celebration of the festive old season, "and if he doesn't come back in after the way we've been celebrating Christmas, he must be incredibly strong. Such feasts, such dances, such magic shows, such games of blind man’s buff, such trips to the theater, such kissing goodbye to the old year and welcoming in the new—nothing like this has ever happened around here before."
Yet had it been to him, this closing year, a time also of much anxiety and strange disappointments of which I am now to speak; and before, with that view, we go back for a while to its earlier months, one step into the new year may be taken for what marked it with interest and importance to him. Eighteen hundred and forty-four was but fifteen days old when a third son (his fifth child, which received the name of its godfather Francis Jeffrey) was born; and here is an answer sent by him, two days later, to an invitation from Maclise, Stanfield, and myself to dine with us at Richmond. "Devonshire Lodge, Seventeenth of January, 1844. Fellow Countrymen! The appeal with which you have honoured me, awakens within my breast emotions that are more easily to be imagined than described. Heaven bless you. I shall indeed be proud, my friends, to respond to such a requisition. I had withdrawn from Public Life—I fondly thought forever—to pass the evening of my days in hydropathical pursuits, and the contemplation of virtue. For which latter purpose, I had bought a looking-glass.—But, my friends, private feeling must ever yield to a stern sense of public duty. The Man is lost in the Invited Guest, and I comply. Nurses, wet and dry; apothecaries; mothers-in-law;[62] babbies; with all the sweet (and chaste) delights of private life; these, my countrymen, are hard to leave. But you have called me forth, and I will come. Fellow countrymen, your friend and faithful servant, Charles Dickens."
Yet for him, this past year was filled with anxiety and unexpected disappointments that I’m about to discuss. Before we look back at its earlier months, let’s take a moment to acknowledge what made the beginning of the new year significant for him. The year 1844 was just fifteen days in when he welcomed his third son (his fifth child, named after his godfather Francis Jeffrey). Here’s a response he sent two days later to an invitation from Maclise, Stanfield, and me to join us for dinner in Richmond. "Devonshire Lodge, Seventeenth of January, 1844. Fellow Citizens! Your invitation touches me deeply in a way that’s easier to imagine than put into words. May heaven bless you. I would be proud, my friends, to accept such a request. I had stepped away from public life—I had hoped forever—to enjoy my later years with health pursuits and thoughts of virtue. For that purpose, I even bought a mirror. But, my friends, personal feelings must always give way to a strong sense of public duty. The Man is lost in the Invited Guest, and I accept. Nurses, both wet and dry; pharmacists; mothers-in-law; [62] babies; with all the sweet (and proper) joys of private life—these are hard to leave behind. But you have summoned me, and I will come. Fellow countrymen, your friend and loyal servant, Charles Dickens."
CHAPTER III.
CHUZZLEWIT DISAPPOINTMENTS AND CHRISTMAS CAROL.
1843-1844.
Chuzzlewit had fallen short of all the expectations formed of it in regard to sale. By much the most masterly of his writings hitherto, the public had rallied to it in far less numbers than to any of its predecessors. The primary cause of this, there is little doubt, had been the change to weekly issues in the form of publication of his last two stories; for into everything in this world mere habit enters more largely than we are apt to suppose. Nor had the temporary withdrawal to America been favourable to an immediate resumption by his readers of their old and intimate relations. This also is to be added, that the excitement by which a popular reputation is kept up to the highest selling mark, will always be subject to lulls too capricious for explanation. But whatever the causes, here[64] was the undeniable fact of a grave depreciation of sale in his writings, unaccompanied by any falling off either in themselves or in the writer's reputation. It was very temporary; but it was present, and to be dealt with accordingly. The forty and fifty thousand purchasers of Pickwick and Nickleby, the sixty and seventy thousand of the early numbers of the enterprize in which the Old Curiosity Shop and Barnaby Rudge appeared, had fallen to little over twenty thousand. They rose somewhat on Martin's ominous announcement, at the end of the fourth number, that he'd go to America; but though it was believed that this resolve, which Dickens adopted as suddenly as his hero, might increase the number of his readers, that reason influenced him less than the challenge to make good his Notes which every mail had been bringing him from unsparing assailants beyond the Atlantic. The substantial effect of the American episode upon the sale was yet by no means great. A couple of thousand additional purchasers were added, but the highest number at any time reached before the story closed was twenty-three thousand. Its sale, since, has ranked next after Pickwick and Copperfield.
Chuzzlewit didn’t meet the expectations for sales that were set for it. Although it was his best work so far, the public responded in much smaller numbers than they had for his earlier books. The main reason for this was likely the shift to weekly publications for his last two stories; habit plays a bigger role in our lives than we often realize. Additionally, his temporary move to America didn’t help readers fall back into their previous close relationship with him. It also needs to be noted that the excitement that keeps a popular reputation at its peak is always subject to sudden drops that are hard to explain. But whatever the reasons, it was clear[64] that there was a significant drop in sales of his works, even though the quality of the writing or his reputation didn’t decline. This decline was very brief, but it needed to be addressed. The forty to fifty thousand readers of Pickwick and Nickleby, and the sixty to seventy thousand from the early installments of the project that included Old Curiosity Shop and Barnaby Rudge, had dropped down to just over twenty thousand. Sales picked up a bit when Martin ominously announced, at the end of the fourth installment, that he would go to America; but although people believed this sudden decision, made as quickly as that of his character, would boost his readership, Dickens was more influenced by the pressure to produce a solid response to the critiques coming from relentless critics across the Atlantic. The impact of the American trip on sales wasn’t huge. Just a couple of thousand more readers were added, but the highest number of sales reached before the story wrapped up was twenty-three thousand. Its sales have since ranked just behind Pickwick and Copperfield.
We were now, however, to have a truth brought home to us which few that have had real or varied experience in such matters can have failed to be impressed by—that publishers are bitter bad judges of an author, and are seldom safe persons to consult in regard to the fate or fortunes that may probably await him. Describing the agreement for this book in September 1841, I spoke of a provision against the improbable event of its profits proving inadequate to certain necessary[65] repayments. In this unlikely case, which was to be ascertained by the proceeds of the first five numbers, the publishers were to have power to appropriate fifty pounds a month out of the two hundred pounds payable for authorship in the expenses of each number; but though this had been introduced with my knowledge, I knew also too much of the antecedent relations of the parties to regard it as other than a mere form to satisfy the attorneys in the case. The fifth number, which landed Martin and Mark in America, and the sixth, which described their first experiences, were published; and on the eve of the seventh, in which Mrs. Gamp was to make her first appearance, I heard with infinite pain that from Mr. Hall, the younger partner of the firm which had enriched itself by Pickwick and Nickleby, and a very kind well-disposed man, there had dropped an inconsiderate hint to the writer of those books that it might be desirable to put the clause in force. It had escaped him without his thinking of all that it involved; certainly the senior partner, whatever amount of as thoughtless sanction he had at the moment given to it, always much regretted it, and made endeavours to exhibit his regret; but the mischief was done, and for the time was irreparable.
We were about to face a reality that few people with real or varied experience in these matters could overlook—that publishers are terrible judges of an author and are rarely reliable sources for advice on what might happen to them. When I described the agreement for this book in September 1841, I mentioned a provision for the unlikely event that its profits didn’t cover certain necessary repayments. In this unlikely case, which was to be determined by the earnings from the first five installments, the publishers would have the authority to take fifty pounds a month from the two hundred pounds allocated for authorship to cover the costs of each issue. Although this was included with my knowledge, I was also too aware of the prior relationships between the parties to see it as anything more than a formality to satisfy the lawyers involved. The fifth issue, which introduced Martin and Mark in America, and the sixth, which documented their initial experiences, were published; and on the eve of the seventh, where Mrs. Gamp was set to make her debut, I was painfully informed that Mr. Hall, the younger partner at the firm that had profited from Pickwick and Nickleby, and who was a very kind and well-meaning man, had carelessly suggested to the writer of those books that it might be wise to activate the clause. He didn’t realize the implications of his words; certainly, the senior partner, despite any thoughtless approval he might have given at the moment, deeply regretted it and tried to show his regret; but the damage was done, and for now, it was irreparable.
"I am so irritated," Dickens wrote to me on the 28th of June, "so rubbed in the tenderest part of my eyelids with bay-salt, by what I told you yesterday, that a wrong kind of fire is burning in my head, and I don't think I can write. Nevertheless, I am trying. In case I should succeed, and should not come down to you this morning, shall you be at the club or elsewhere after dinner? I am bent on paying the money. And[66] before going into the matter with anybody I should like you to propound from me the one preliminary question to Bradbury and Evans. It is more than a year and a half since Clowes wrote to urge me to give him a hearing, in case I should ever think of altering my plans. A printer is better than a bookseller, and it is quite as much the interest of one (if not more) to join me. But whoever it is, or whatever, I am bent upon paying Chapman and Hall down. And when I have done that, Mr. Hall shall have a piece of my mind."
"I'm really annoyed," Dickens wrote to me on June 28th, "so irritated in the most sensitive part of my eyelids from what I told you yesterday, that there's a wrong kind of fire burning in my head, and I don't think I can write. Still, I'm trying. If I manage to get something done and don't come down to see you this morning, will you be at the club or somewhere else after dinner? I’m determined to pay the money. And[66] before discussing anything with anyone else, I’d like you to ask Bradbury and Evans one important question on my behalf. It's been over a year and a half since Clowes wrote to push me to give him a chance, in case I was ever thinking about changing my plans. A printer is better than a bookseller, and it's in their interest (if not more) to collaborate with me. But whoever it is, or whatever happens, I'm determined to settle up with Chapman and Hall for good. And once I've done that, Mr. Hall will hear what I really think."
What he meant by the proposed repayment will be understood by what formerly was said of his arrangements with these gentlemen on the repurchase of his early copyrights. Feeling no surprise at this announcement, I yet prevailed with him to suspend proceedings until his return from Broadstairs in October; and what then I had to say led to memorable resolves. The communication he had desired me to make to his printers had taken them too much by surprise to enable them to form a clear judgment respecting it; and they replied by suggestions which were in effect a confession of that want of confidence in themselves. They enlarged upon the great results that would follow a reissue of his writings in a cheap form; they strongly urged such an undertaking; and they offered to invest to any desired amount in the establishment of a magazine or other periodical to be edited by him. The possible dangers, in short, incident to their assuming the position of publishers as well as printers of new works from his pen, seemed at first to be so much greater than on closer examination they were found to be, that at the outset they shrank from encountering[67] them. And hence the remarkable letter I shall now quote (1st of November, 1843).
What he meant by the proposed repayment will be understood by what was previously said about his arrangements with these gentlemen regarding the repurchase of his early copyrights. While I wasn't surprised by this announcement, I convinced him to pause proceedings until he returned from Broadstairs in October; what I had to say then led to significant decisions. The message he wanted me to convey to his printers caught them off guard, making it difficult for them to form a clear judgment about it; their response included suggestions that effectively revealed their lack of confidence in themselves. They elaborated on the great outcomes that would come from reissuing his writings in a more affordable format; they strongly advocated for this undertaking and even offered to invest any amount needed in starting a magazine or other periodical that he would edit. The potential risks involved in them taking on the role of both publishers and printers for new works from him initially seemed much greater than they actually were upon closer examination, which is why they hesitated to face them. This led to the remarkable letter I will now quote (1st of November, 1843).
"Don't be startled by the novelty and extent of my project. Both startled me at first; but I am well assured of its wisdom and necessity. I am afraid of a magazine—just now. I don't think the time a good one, or the chances favourable. I am afraid of putting myself before the town as writing tooth and nail for bread, headlong, after the close of a book taking so much out of one as Chuzzlewit. I am afraid I could not do it, with justice to myself. I know that whatever we may say at first, a new magazine, or a new anything, would require so much propping, that I should be forced (as in the Clock) to put myself into it, in my old shape. I am afraid of Bradbury and Evans's desire to force on the cheap issue of my books, or any of them, prematurely. I am sure if it took place yet awhile, it would damage me and damage the property, enormously. It is very natural in them to want it; but, since they do want it, I have no faith in their regarding me in any other respect than they would regard any other man in a speculation. I see that this is really your opinion as well; and I don't see what I gain, in such a case, by leaving Chapman and Hall. If I had made money, I should unquestionably fade away from the public eye for a year, and enlarge my stock of description and observation by seeing countries new to me; which it is most necessary to me that I should see, and which with an increasing family I can scarcely hope to see at all, unless I see them now. Already for some time I have had this hope and intention before me; and though not having made money[68] yet, I find or fancy that I can put myself in the position to accomplish it. And this is the course I have before me. At the close of Chuzzlewit (by which time the debt will have been materially reduced) I purpose drawing from Chapman and Hall my share of the subscription—bills, or money, will do equally well. I design to tell them that it is not likely I shall do anything for a year; that, in the meantime, I make no arrangement whatever with any one; and our business matters rest in statu quo. The same to Bradbury and Evans. I shall let the house if I can; if not, leave it to be let. I shall take all the family, and two servants—three at most—to some place which I know beforehand to be cheap and in a delightful climate, in Normandy or Brittany, to which I shall go over, first, and where I shall rent some house for six or eight months. During that time, I shall walk through Switzerland, cross the Alps, travel through France and Italy; take Kate perhaps to Rome and Venice, but not elsewhere; and in short see everything that is to be seen. I shall write my descriptions to you from time to time, exactly as I did in America; and you will be able to judge whether or not a new and attractive book may not be made on such ground. At the same time I shall be able to turn over the story I have in my mind, and which I have a strong notion might be published with great advantage, first in Paris—but that's another matter to be talked over. And of course I have not yet settled, either, whether any book about the travel, or this, should be the first. 'All very well,' you say, 'if you had money enough.' Well, but if I can see my way to what would be necessary without binding myself in any form to[69] anything; without paying interest, or giving any security but one of my Eagle five thousand pounds; you would give up that objection. And I stand committed to no bookseller, printer, money-lender, banker, or patron whatever; and decidedly strengthen my position with my readers, instead of weakening it, drop by drop, as I otherwise must. Is it not so? and is not the way before me, plainly this? I infer that in reality you do yourself think, that what I first thought of is not the way? I have told you my scheme very badly, as I said I would. I see its great points, against many prepossessions the other way—as, leaving England, home, friends, everything I am fond of—but it seems to me, at a critical time, the step to set me right. A blessing on Mr. Mariotti my Italian master, and his pupil!—If you have any breath left, tell Topping how you are."
"Don't be surprised by the novelty and scale of my project. I was surprised too at first, but I'm confident in its wisdom and necessity. Right now, I'm hesitant about launching a magazine. I don't think the timing is right or the chances are good. I'm concerned about putting myself out there as someone who writes frantically for a living right after finishing a book that took so much out of me, like Chuzzlewit. I'm afraid I wouldn't be able to do it justice. I know that no matter what we say at first, a new magazine, or anything new, would need so much support that I would have to revert to my old ways again. I'm worried about Bradbury and Evans pushing for the quick release of my books, or any of them, too soon. I'm sure if it happens too soon, it would hurt both me and the work itself, enormously. It's only natural for them to want that; but since they do want it, I don't believe they view me any differently than they would any other person in a business venture. I see that you actually share this opinion; and I don't understand what I would gain by leaving Chapman and Hall in such a case. If I had made money, I would definitely step away from the public eye for a year, and expand my experience and insights by traveling to countries that are new to me; which I absolutely need to see, and which, with a growing family, I can hardly hope to see at all unless I do it now. I have had this hope and intention in mind for a while now; and even though I haven't made money[68] yet, I feel I can position myself to achieve it. This is the plan I have ahead of me. At the end of Chuzzlewit (by which point my debt will have been significantly reduced), I plan to withdraw from Chapman and Hall my share of the subscription—whether bills or cash works equally well. I intend to tell them that I probably won't be doing anything for a year; that, in the meantime, I’m not making any arrangements with anyone; and our business matters will remain in statu quo. The same goes for Bradbury and Evans. I’ll try to rent out my house; if that doesn’t work, I’ll leave it to be rented. I’ll take my whole family, and two servants—three at most—to some place that I know will be affordable and have a pleasant climate, in Normandy or Brittany, where I will go first, and where I’ll rent a house for six or eight months. During that time, I will walk through Switzerland, cross the Alps, travel through France and Italy; I might take Kate to Rome and Venice, but nowhere else; and basically see everything there is to see. I will write my impressions to you from time to time, just like I did in America; and you will be able to judge whether a new and interesting book could come from such experiences. At the same time, I’ll be able to work through the story I have in mind, which I strongly believe could be published with great success, first in Paris—but that’s another topic we can discuss later. And of course, I haven't yet decided whether any travel book or this one should come first. 'That’s great,' you might say, 'if you had enough money.' Well, but if I can figure out what I need without being tied down in any way; without paying interest, or offering any security other than my Eagle five thousand pounds; you would drop that concern. And I'm not beholden to any bookseller, printer, money-lender, banker, or patron; and this definitely strengthens my position with my readers, rather than weakening it, drop by drop, as it otherwise would. Isn't that right? And isn't the path ahead of me pretty clear? I gather that you really do think what I initially considered is not the way? I've explained my plan poorly, as I said I would. I see its significant advantages, despite many biases against it—like leaving England, home, friends, everything I cherish—but to me, at this crucial moment, it's the step that will set things right. A shout-out to Mr. Mariotti, my Italian teacher, and his student!—If you still have any energy left, tell Topping how you are."
I had certainly not much after reading this letter, written amid all the distractions of his work, with both the Carol and Chuzzlewit in hand; but such insufficient breath as was left to me I spent against the project, and in favour of far more consideration than he had given to it, before anything should be settled. "I expected you," he wrote next day (the 2nd of November), "to be startled. If I was startled myself, when I first got this project of foreign travel into my head, months AGO, how much more must you be, on whom it comes fresh: numbering only hours! Still, I am very resolute upon it—very. I am convinced that my expenses abroad would not be more than half of my expenses here; the influence of change and nature upon me, enormous. You know, as well as I, that I think[70] Chuzzlewit in a hundred points immeasurably the best of my stories. That I feel my power now, more than I ever did. That I have a greater confidence in myself than I ever had. That I know, if I have health, I could sustain my place in the minds of thinking men, though fifty writers started up to-morrow. But how many readers do not think! How many take it upon trust from knaves and idiots, that one writes too fast, or runs a thing to death! How coldly did this very book go on for months, until it forced itself up in people's opinion, without forcing itself up in sale! If I wrote for forty thousand Forsters, or for forty thousand people who know I write because I can't help it, I should have no need to leave the scene. But this very book warns me that if I can leave it for a time, I had better do so, and must do so. Apart from that again, I feel that longer rest after this story would do me good. You say two or three months, because you have been used to see me for eight years never leaving off. But it is not rest enough. It is impossible to go on working the brain to that extent for ever. The very spirit of the thing, in doing it, leaves a horrible despondency behind, when it is done; which must be prejudicial to the mind, so soon renewed, and so seldom let alone. What would poor Scott have given to have gone abroad, of his own free will, a young man, instead of creeping there, a driveller, in his miserable decay! I said myself in my note to you—anticipating what you put to me—that it was a question what I should come out with, first. The travel-book, if to be done at all, would cost me very little trouble; and surely would go very far to pay charges, whenever published. We have[71] spoken of the baby, and of leaving it here with Catherine's mother. Moving the children into France could not, in any ordinary course of things, do them anything but good. And the question is, what it would do to that by which they live: not what it would do to them.—I had forgotten that point in the B. and E. negociation; but they certainly suggested instant publication of the reprints, or at all events of some of them; by which of course I know, and as you point out, I could provide of myself what is wanted. I take that as putting the thing distinctly as a matter of trade, and feeling it so. And, as a matter of trade with them or anybody else, as a matter of trade between me and the public, should I not be better off a year hence, with the reputation of having seen so much in the meantime? The reason which induces you to look upon this scheme with dislike—separation for so long a time—surely has equal weight with me. I see very little pleasure in it, beyond the natural desire to have been in those great scenes; I anticipate no enjoyment at the time. I have come to look upon it as a matter of policy and duty. I have a thousand other reasons, but shall very soon myself be with you."
I really didn't have much after reading this letter, written among all the distractions of his work, with both Carol and Chuzzlewit in hand; but whatever little energy I had left, I spent against the idea and in favor of much more thought than he had given it before anything was finalized. "I expected you," he wrote the next day (November 2nd), "to be surprised. If I was surprised myself when I first got this idea of traveling abroad months AGO, how much more must you be, since it’s brand new to you: just a matter of hours! Still, I’m very determined about it—very. I am sure that my expenses overseas would be less than half of what they are here; the impact of change and nature on me is huge. You know, as well as I do, that I consider Chuzzlewit to be, in many ways, the best of my stories. I feel my abilities now more than ever. I have more confidence in myself than I ever had. I know that if I have my health, I could hold my place in the minds of thoughtful people, even if fifty new writers came out tomorrow. But how many readers do not think? How many just take the word of fools and idiots that someone writes too quickly or runs things into the ground? How poorly did this very book sell for months, until it finally gained some respect, even though it didn't sell? If I were writing for forty thousand Forsters, or for forty thousand people who understand that I write because I can't help it, I wouldn't need to step away. But this book warns me that if I can take a break for a while, I should do so, and I must. On top of that, I feel that a longer break after this story would do me good. You suggest two or three months because you've seen me work nonstop for eight years. But that’s not enough rest. It’s impossible to keep pushing the brain to that degree forever. The very essence of the task leaves a terrible sadness behind when it's completed, which must be harmful to a mind that’s meant to renew itself so quickly and is rarely left alone. What would poor Scott have given to travel abroad, of his own choice, as a young man instead of dragging himself there, old and broken, in his miserable decline! I mentioned in my note to you—anticipating what you would suggest—that it was a question of what I should release first. The travel book, if it happens, would take me very little effort; and it would surely help cover costs when published. We’ve already talked about the baby and leaving it with Catherine's mother. Moving the kids to France could only benefit them in a normal situation. The real question is what it would do to what supports them—not what it would do to them. I forgot that point in the B. and E. negotiations; but they definitely suggested immediate publication of the reprints, or at least some of them; which I know, as you noted, I could provide myself what is needed. I view that as clearly a matter of business, and I feel that way about it. And, as a business matter with them or anyone else, in a trade between me and the public, shouldn't I be in a better position a year from now, with the reputation of having seen so much in the meantime? The reason you look unfavorably upon this plan—being apart for so long—certainly weighs on me too. I see very little pleasure in it, aside from the natural desire to have experienced those great scenes; I expect no enjoyment in the moment. I’ve come to see it as a matter of strategy and obligation. I have a thousand other reasons, but I’ll be with you very soon."
There were difficulties, still to be strongly urged, against taking any present step to a final resolve; and he gave way a little. But the pressure was soon renewed. "I have been," he wrote (10th of November), "all day in Chuzzlewit agonies—conceiving only. I hope to bring forth to-morrow. Will you come here at six? I want to say a word or two about the cover of the Carol and the advertising, and to consult you on a nice point in the tale. It will come wonderfully[72] I think. Mac will call here soon after, and we can then all three go to Bulwer's together. And do, my dear fellow, do for God's sake turn over about Chapman and Hall, and look upon my project as a settled thing. If you object to see them, I must write to them." My reluctance as to the question affecting his old publishers was connected with the little story, which, amid all his perturbations and troubles and "Chuzzlewit agonies," he was steadily carrying to its close; and which remains a splendid proof of how thoroughly he was borne out in the assertion just before made, of the sense of his power felt by him, and his confidence that it had never been greater than when his readers were thus falling off from him. He had entrusted the Carol for publication on his own account, under the usual terms of commission, to the firm he had been so long associated with; and at such a moment to tell them, short of absolute necessity, his intention to quit them altogether, I thought a needless putting in peril of the little book's chances. He yielded to this argument; but the issue, as will be found, was less fortunate than I hoped.
There were challenges, still strongly pushed against making any immediate decision towards a final solution; and he agreed a bit. But the pressure quickly resumed. "I've been," he wrote (November 10), "in Chuzzlewit agony all day—just thinking. I hope to give birth to something tomorrow. Will you come here at six? I want to discuss the cover of the Carol and the advertising, and consult you on a tricky point in the story. I think it will turn out wonderfully[72]. Mac will come by shortly after, and then the three of us can go to Bulwer's together. And please, my dear friend, do consider moving forward with Chapman and Hall, and see my project as a settled thing. If you don’t want to meet them, I’ll have to write to them." My hesitation regarding the matter with his old publishers was linked to the little story that, despite all his distress and "Chuzzlewit agonies," he was steadily bringing to completion; and which stands as a great testament to how firmly he believed in his abilities and his confidence that it had never been stronger even when he was experiencing a drop in readership. He had taken the Carol for publication on his own, under the standard commission terms, with the company he had been associated with for so long; and at such a time to tell them, unless absolutely necessary, of his intention to leave them altogether, seemed like a needless risk to the book's prospects. He agreed with this reasoning; but the outcome, as will be seen, turned out to be less fortunate than I had hoped.
Let disappointments or annoyances, however, beset him as they might, once heartily in his work and all was forgotten. His temperament of course coloured everything, cheerful or sad, and his present outlook was disturbed by imaginary fears; but it was very certain that his labours and successes thus far had enriched others more than himself, and while he knew that his mode of living had been scrupulously governed by what he believed to be his means, the first suspicion that these might be inadequate made a change necessary[73] to so upright a nature. It was the turning-point of his career; and the issue, though not immediately, ultimately justified him. Much of his present restlessness I was too ready myself to ascribe to that love of change in him which was always arising from his passionate desire to vary and extend his observation; but even as to this the result showed him right in believing that he should obtain decided intellectual advantage from the mere effects of such farther travel. Here indeed he spoke from experience, for already he had returned from America with wider views than when he started, and with a larger maturity of mind. The money difficulties on which he dwelt were also, it is now to be admitted, unquestionable. Beyond his own domestic expenses necessarily increasing, there were many, never-satisfied, constantly-recurring claims from family quarters, not the more easily avoidable because unreasonable and unjust; and it was after describing to me one such with great bitterness, a few days following the letter last quoted, that he thus replied on the following day (19th of November) to the comment I had made upon it. "I was most horribly put out for a little while; for I had got up early to go at it, and was full of interest in what I had to do. But having eased my mind by that note to you, and taken a turn or two up and down the room, I went at it again, and soon got so interested that I blazed away till 9 last night; only stopping ten minutes for dinner! I suppose I wrote eight printed pages of Chuzzlewit yesterday. The consequence is that I could finish to-day, but am taking it easy, and making myself laugh very much." The very next day, unhappily, there came to himself a[74] repetition of precisely similar trouble in exaggerated form, and to me a fresh reminder of what was gradually settling into a fixed resolve. "I am quite serious and sober when I say, that I have very grave thoughts of keeping my whole menagerie in Italy, three years."
Let disappointments or annoyances bother him as they might, once he was fully engaged in his work, everything was forgotten. His temperament, of course, influenced everything, whether cheerful or sad, and his current outlook was troubled by imaginary fears; but it was clear that his efforts and successes had benefited others more than himself. While he knew his lifestyle had been carefully controlled by what he believed to be his means, the slightest doubt that these might be insufficient made a change necessary for someone so principled. It was the turning point of his career; and though the outcome wasn't immediate, it ultimately vindicated him. Much of his current restlessness I was quick to attribute to his love of change, which stemmed from his passionate desire to explore and expand his understanding; but even regarding this, the results showed he was right to believe he would gain significant intellectual benefit from simply traveling further. Indeed, he spoke from experience, for he had already returned from America with broader perspectives than when he left, and with greater maturity. The financial challenges he mentioned were also undeniably real. In addition to his increasing domestic expenses, there were many constant, unsatisfied demands from family, which were not any easier to deal with because they were unreasonable and unfair. It was after describing one such situation with great bitterness just a few days after the last quoted letter that he replied to my comment the next day (19th of November). "I was really upset for a little while; I had gotten up early to tackle it, and was very interested in what I had to do. But after venting my thoughts in that note to you and pacing the room a bit, I got back to it and soon became so engaged that I worked straight through until 9 last night, only taking a ten-minute break for dinner! I think I wrote eight printed pages of Chuzzlewit yesterday. The result is that I could finish today, but I’m taking it easy and having a lot of laughs." Unfortunately, the very next day brought him a repetition of that same trouble, but in an amplified form, and for me, it was another reminder of what was gradually becoming a firm decision. "I am quite serious and sober when I say that I have very serious thoughts about keeping my entire menagerie in Italy for three years."
Of the book which awoke such varied feelings and was the occasion of such vicissitudes of fortune, some notice is now due; and this, following still as yet my former rule, will be not so much critical as biographical. He had left for Italy before the completed tale was published, and its reception for a time was exactly what his just-quoted letter prefigures. It had forced itself up in public opinion without forcing itself up in sale. It was felt generally to be an advance upon his previous stories, and his own opinion is not to be questioned that it was in a hundred points immeasurably the best of them thus far; less upon the surface, and going deeper into springs of character. Nor would it be difficult to say, in a single word, where the excellence lay that gave it this superiority. It had brought his highest faculty into play: over and above other qualities it had given scope to his imagination; and it first expressed the distinction in this respect between his earlier and his later books. Apart wholly from this, too, his letters will have confirmed a remark already made upon the degree to which his mental power had been altogether deepened and enlarged by the effect of his visit to America.
Of the book that stirred such a mix of emotions and led to so many ups and downs, it deserves some attention now; and sticking to my previous approach, this will be more biographical than critical. He had gone to Italy before the complete story was published, and its reception was exactly what his previously quoted letter predicted. It gained traction in public opinion without significantly boosting sales. People generally felt it was a step forward from his earlier stories, and there’s no doubt that he believed it was, in many ways, the best work he had done up to that point—less superficial and more insightful into the depths of character. It's easy to pinpoint the quality that gave it this edge: it engaged his highest abilities and, in addition to other qualities, allowed his imagination to flourish; it clearly highlighted the difference between his earlier and later works. Besides this, his letters would have supported a previous observation about how his time in America had significantly deepened and expanded his mental capabilities.
In construction and conduct of story Martin Chuzzlewit is defective, character and description constituting[75] the chief part of its strength. But what it lost as a story by the American episode it gained in the other direction; young Martin, by happy use of a bitter experience, casting off his slough of selfishness in the poisonous swamp of Eden. Dickens often confessed, however, the difficulty it had been to him to have to deal with this gap in the main course of his narrative; and I will give an instance from a letter he wrote to me when engaged upon the number in which Jonas brings his wife to her miserable home. "I write in haste" (28th of July 1843), "for I have been at work all day; and, it being against the grain with me to go back to America when my interest is strong in the other parts of the tale, have got on but slowly. I have a great notion to work out with Sydney's favourite,[70] and long to be at him again." But obstructions of this kind with Dickens measured only and always the degree of readiness and resource with which he rose to meet them, and never had his handling of character been so masterly as in Chuzzlewit. The persons delineated in former books had been more agreeable, but never so interpenetrated with meanings brought out with a grasp so large, easy, and firm. As well in this as in the passionate vividness of its descriptions, the imaginative power makes itself felt. The windy autumn night, with the mad desperation of the hunted leaves and the roaring mirth of the blazing village forge; the market-day[76] at Salisbury; the winter walk, and the coach journey to London by night; the ship voyage over the Atlantic; the stormy midnight travel before the murder, the stealthy enterprise and cowardly return of the murderer; these are all instances of first-rate description, original in the design, imaginative in all the detail, and very complete in the execution. But the higher power to which I direct attention is even better discerned in the persons and dialogue. With nothing absent or abated in its sharp impressions of reality, there are more of the subtle requisites which satisfy reflection and thought. We have in this book for the most part, not only observation but the outcome of it, the knowledge as well as the fact. While we witness as vividly the life immediately passing, we are more conscious of the permanent life above and beyond it. Nothing nearly so effective therefore had yet been achieved by him. He had scrutinised as truly and satirised as keenly; but had never shown the imaginative insight with which he now sent his humour and his art into the core of the vices of the time.
In constructing and telling the story of Martin Chuzzlewit, there are flaws, but the characters and descriptions are its greatest strengths. While it lost some storytelling quality due to the American episode, it gained depth; young Martin, through a difficult experience, sheds his selfishness in the toxic swamp of Eden. Dickens often admitted, however, that it was challenging for him to deal with this gap in the main narrative. I’ll share an example from a letter he wrote to me while working on the part where Jonas brings his wife to her unhappy home. "I’m writing quickly" (July 28, 1843), "because I've been working all day, and it’s hard for me to go back to America when I’m really invested in other parts of the story, so I’ve made slow progress. I really want to work with Sydney's favorite,[70] and can’t wait to get back to him." But these kinds of obstacles for Dickens only measured how skillfully and resourcefully he faced them, and he had never handled characters so masterfully as he did in Chuzzlewit. The characters drawn in his earlier works might have been more likable, but they were never as rich with meanings presented with such a broad, confident, and steady grasp. In addition to the intense vibrancy of its descriptions, the imaginative power shines through. The blustery autumn night, with the frantic chaos of the swirling leaves and the boisterous laughter of the roaring village forge; the market day[76] in Salisbury; the winter walk, and the nighttime coach ride to London; the ocean voyage across the Atlantic; the stormy midnight travel before the murder, the sneaky venture and cowardly retreat of the murderer; all these are examples of outstanding descriptions—original in concept, imaginative in every detail, and thoroughly crafted. But the greater power I want to highlight is even more apparent in the characters and dialogue. Without losing any sharpness in its realistic impressions, there is more of the subtle elements that engage reflection and thought. In this book, we mostly find not just observation but the insights that come from it, knowledge alongside the facts. As we vividly witness the life happening around us, we become more aware of the enduring existence beyond it. Nothing quite so effective had been achieved by him before. He had analyzed as sharply and satirized as keenly, but had never exhibited the imaginative insight with which he now infused his humor and artistry into the very heart of the vices of his time.
Sending me the second chapter of his eighth number on the 15th of August, he gave me the latest tidings from America. "I gather from a letter I have had this morning that Martin has made them all stark staring raving mad across the water. I wish you would consider this. Don't you think the time has come when I ought to state that such public entertainments as I received in the States were either accepted before I went out, or in the first week after my arrival there; and that as soon as I began to have any acquaintance with the country, I set my face against any public recognition[77] whatever but that which was forced upon me to the destruction of my peace and comfort—and made no secret of my real sentiments." We did not agree as to this, and the notion was abandoned; though his correspondent had not overstated the violence of the outbreak in the States when those chapters exploded upon them. But though an angry they are a good humoured and a very placable people; and, as time moved on a little, the laughter on that side of the Atlantic became quite as great as our amusement on this side, at the astonishing fun and comicality of these scenes. With a little reflection the Americans had doubtless begun to find out that the advantage was not all with us, nor the laughter wholly against them.
Sending me the second chapter of his eighth issue on August 15, he shared the latest news from America. "I learned from a letter I received this morning that Martin has driven everyone over there completely mad. I wish you would think about this. Don't you think it's time for me to say that the public events I attended in the States were either planned before I went or during the first week after my arrival? As soon as I started to get to know the country, I rejected any public recognition whatsoever, except for what was forced on me to the detriment of my peace and comfort—and I was open about my true feelings." We didn't see eye to eye on this, and the idea was dropped; although his correspondent had not exaggerated the intensity of the response in the States when those chapters hit. But even when upset, they are a good-natured and quite forgiving people; and as time went on, the laughter on that side of the Atlantic became just as strong as our amusement on this side at the absurdity and humor of those scenes. After some reflection, the Americans likely began to realize that the advantage was not entirely on our side, nor was the laughter completely against them.
They had no Pecksniff at any rate. Bred in a more poisonous swamp than their Eden, of greatly older standing and much harder to be drained, Pecksniff was all our own. The confession is not encouraging to national pride, but this character is so far English, that though our countrymen as a rule are by no means Pecksniffs, the ruling weakness is to countenance and encourage the race. When people call the character exaggerated, and protest that the lines are too broad to deceive any one, they only refuse, naturally enough, to sanction in a book what half their lives is passed in tolerating if not in worshipping. Dickens, illustrating his never-failing experience of being obliged to subdue in his books what he knew to be real for fear it should be deemed impossible, had already made the remark in his preface to Nickleby, that the world, which is so very credulous in what professes to be true, is most incredulous in what professes to be imaginary. They[78] agree to be deceived in a reality, and reward themselves by refusing to be deceived in a fiction. That a great many people who might have sat for Pecksniff, should condemn him for a grotesque impossibility, as Dickens averred to be the case, was no more than might be expected. A greater danger he has exposed more usefully in showing the greater numbers, who, desiring secretly to be thought better than they are, support eagerly pretensions that keep their own in countenance, and, without being Pecksniffs, render Pecksniffs possible. All impostures would have something too suspicious or forbidding in their look if we were not prepared to meet them half way.
They didn't have a Pecksniff, at least. Raised in a more toxic environment than their paradise, one that's much older and harder to drain, Pecksniff was uniquely ours. This admission isn't great for national pride, but this character is so distinctly English that, although our countrymen aren’t typically Pecksniffs, there’s a tendency to tolerate and even encourage that type. When people say the character is exaggerated and argue that the portrayal is too extreme to fool anyone, they are simply refusing, understandably, to accept in a book what they spend half their lives putting up with, if not glorifying. Dickens, drawing from his consistent experience of needing to tone down what he knew to be true to avoid it seeming unbelievable, already noted in his preface to Nickleby that while the world is incredibly gullible when it comes to what claims to be true, it is very skeptical about what claims to be imaginary. They agree to be fooled in reality and reward themselves by refusing to be fooled in fiction. It's not surprising that many people who could be identified as Pecksniff would criticize him as an absurd impossibility, as Dickens claimed. A greater danger he highlighted is the larger group that, secretly wanting to appear better than they are, eagerly supports pretenses that validate their own behavior and, without being Pecksniffs themselves, make Pecksniffs possible. All deceptions would seem too suspicious or unwelcoming if we weren’t ready to meet them halfway.
There is one thing favourable to us however, even in this view, which a French critic has lately suggested. Informing us that there are no Pecksniffs to be found in France, Mr. Taine explains this by the fact that his countrymen have ceased to affect virtue, and pretend only to vice; that a charlatan setting up morality would have no sort of following; that religion and the domestic virtues have gone so utterly to rags as not to be worth putting on for a deceitful garment; and that, no principles being left to parade, the only chance for the French modern Tartuffe is to confess and exaggerate weaknesses. We seem to have something of an advantage here. We require at least that the respectable homage of vice to virtue should not be omitted. "Charity, my dear," says our English Tartuffe, upon being bluntly called what he really is, "when I take my chamber-candlestick to-night, remind me to be more than usually particular in praying for Mr. Anthony Chuzzlewit, who has done me an injustice." No amount of self-indulgence[79] weakens or lowers his pious and reflective tone. "Those are her daughters," he remarks, making maudlin overtures to Mrs. Todgers in memory of his deceased wife. "Mercy and Charity, Charity and Mercy, not unholy names I hope. She was beautiful. She had a small property." When his condition has fallen into something so much worse than maudlin that his friends have to put him to bed, they have not had time to descend the staircase when he is seen to be "fluttering" on the top landing, desiring to collect their sentiments on the nature of human life. "Let us be moral. Let us contemplate existence." He turns his old pupil out of doors in the attitude of blessing him, and when he has discharged that social duty retires to shed his personal tribute of a few tears in the back garden. No conceivable position, action, or utterance finds him without the vice in which his being is entirely steeped and saturated. Of such consummate consistency is its practice with him, that in his own house with his daughters he continues it to keep his hand in; and from the mere habit of keeping up appearances, even to himself, falls into the trap of Jonas. Thackeray used to say that there was nothing finer in rascaldom than this ruin of Pecksniff by his son-in-law at the very moment when the oily hypocrite believes himself to be achieving his masterpiece of dissembling over the more vulgar avowed ruffian. "'Jonas!' cried Mr. Pecksniff much affected, 'I am not a diplomatical character; my heart is in my hand. By far the greater part of the inconsiderable savings I have accumulated in the course of—I hope—a not dishonourable or useless career, is already given, devised, or bequeathed[80] (correct me, my dear Jonas, if I am technically wrong), with expressions of confidence which I will not repeat; and in securities which it is unnecessary to mention; to a person whom I cannot, whom I will not, whom I need not, name.' Here he gave the hand of his son-in-law a fervent squeeze, as if he would have added, 'God bless you: be very careful of it when you get it!'"
There's one thing in our favor, though, even considering this perspective, which a French critic recently pointed out. Mr. Taine tells us that there are no Pecksniffs in France, explaining this by saying that his fellow countrymen have stopped pretending to be virtuous and only pretend to be immoral. A fraud claiming to be moral wouldn’t attract any followers; religion and domestic virtues have completely fallen apart and aren’t even worth pretending to wear as a deceitful facade; and since no principles are left to show off, the only way for the French modern Tartuffe to survive is to admit and exaggerate his flaws. We seem to have a bit of an advantage here. We still expect that at least the respectable facade of vice paying homage to virtue should remain intact. “Charity, my dear,” says our English Tartuffe when someone bluntly labels him for what he truly is, “when I take my chamber candlestick tonight, please remind me to pray particularly hard for Mr. Anthony Chuzzlewit, who has wronged me.” No level of self-indulgence decreases or tarnishes his pious and reflective tone. “Those are her daughters,” he comments, making overly sentimental gestures to Mrs. Todgers in memory of his deceased wife. “Mercy and Charity, Charity and Mercy, I hope they’re not unholy names. She was beautiful. She had a little property.” When his condition sinks into something far worse than sentimental, to the point where his friends have to help him to bed, they haven’t even made it down the stairs before he is seen “fluttering” on the top landing, wanting to share his thoughts on the nature of human life. “Let’s be moral. Let’s reflect on existence.” He sends his old pupil away while pretending to bless him, and once he fulfills that social duty, he goes to shed a personal tribute with a few tears in the back garden. No conceivable position, action, or remark is free from the vice that completely permeates and saturates his being. His practice of this vice is so thoroughly consistent that even in his own home with his daughters, he carries it on to stay in practice; and by merely keeping up appearances, even to himself, he falls into Jonas’s trap. Thackeray used to say that nothing was finer in deceit than this downfall of Pecksniff at the hands of his son-in-law just when the oily hypocrite thinks he’s pulling off his greatest act of deception against a more openly brutal criminal. “‘Jonas!’ cried Mr. Pecksniff, quite moved, ‘I am not a diplomatic person; my heart is on my sleeve. The vast majority of the trivial savings I’ve accumulated over—what I hope is a not dishonorable or useless career—has already been given, devised, or bequeathed (correct me, my dear Jonas, if I’m technically wrong), with expressions of confidence I won’t repeat; and in securities that don’t need mentioning; to someone whom I cannot, whom I will not, whom I need not, name.’ Here he gave his son-in-law’s hand a heartfelt squeeze, as if to add, ‘God bless you: be very careful with it when you get it!’”
Certainly Dickens thus far had done nothing of which, as in this novel, the details were filled in with such minute and incomparable skill; where the wealth of comic circumstance was lavished in such overflowing abundance on single types of character; or where generally, as throughout the story, the intensity of his observation of individual humours and vices had taken so many varieties of imaginative form. Everything in Chuzzlewit indeed had grown under treatment, as will be commonly the case in the handling of a man of genius, who never knows where any given conception may lead him, out of the wealth of resource in development and incident which it has itself created. "As to the way," he wrote to me of its two most prominent figures, as soon as all their capabilities were revealed to him, "As to the way in which these characters have opened out, that is, to me, one of the most surprising processes of the mind in this sort of invention. Given what one knows, what one does not know springs up; and I am as absolutely certain of its being true, as I am of the law of gravitation—if such a thing be possible, more so." The remark displays exactly what in all his important characters was the very process of creation with him.
Certainly, Dickens had, up to this point, done nothing where, as in this novel, the details were filled in with such precise and unmatched skill; where the richness of humorous situations was poured out so abundantly on single character types; or where, throughout the story, the depth of his observation of individual quirks and flaws had taken so many creative forms. Everything in Chuzzlewit had indeed developed under his care, as is often the case with a genius who has no idea where a particular concept might lead him, drawing from the wealth of resources in development and events that it generates. "As for the way," he wrote to me about its two main characters, once all their potential was clear to him, "As for how these characters have unfolded, that is, to me, one of the most astonishing processes of the mind in this type of invention. Given what we know, what we don't know emerges; and I am just as sure of its truth as I am of the law of gravity—if such a thing is possible, even more so." This comment perfectly captures the creative process he experienced with all his significant characters.
Nor was it in the treatment only of his present fiction,[81] but also in its subject or design, that he had gone higher than in preceding efforts. Broadly what he aimed at, he would have expressed on the title-page if I had not dissuaded him, by printing there as its motto a verse altered from that prologue of his own composition to which I have formerly referred: "Your homes the scene. Yourselves, the actors, here!" Debtors' prisons, parish Bumbledoms, Yorkshire schools, were vile enough, but something much more pestiferous was now the aim of his satire; and he had not before so decisively shown vigour, daring, or discernment of what lay within reach of his art, as in taking such a person as Pecksniff for the central figure in a tale of existing life. Setting him up as the glass through which to view the groups around him, we are not the less moved to a hearty detestation of the social vices they exhibit, and pre-eminently of selfishness in all its forms, because we see more plainly than ever that there is but one vice which is quite irremediable. The elder Chuzzlewits are bad enough, but they bring their self-inflicted punishments; the Jonases and Tigg Montagues are execrable, but the law has its halter and its penal servitude; the Moulds and Gamps have plague-bearing breaths, from which sanitary wisdom may clear us; but from the sleek, smiling, crawling abomination of a Pecksniff, there is no help but self-help. Every man's hand should be against him, for his is against every man; and, as Mr. Taine very wisely warns us, the virtues have most need to be careful that they do not make themselves panders to his vice. It is an amiable weakness to put the best face on the worst things, but there is none more dangerous. There is nothing so common as the mistake[82] of Tom Pinch, and nothing so rare as his excuses.
He not only elevated the way he handled his current story,[81] but also the subject and design, going beyond his previous works. What he aimed to convey, he might have put on the title page with a motto adapted from an earlier prologue of his own creation, which I had talked him out of: "Your homes are the setting. You are the actors, right here!" While debtors' prisons, local governments, and Yorkshire schools were bad enough, his satire now targeted something even more toxic. He had never before shown such energy, boldness, or insight into what his art could capture as he did by choosing someone like Pecksniff as the main character in a story about real life. By using him as the lens through which we see the surrounding groups, we can't help but feel a strong disdain for the social ills they represent, especially the selfishness in all its forms, because it becomes clearer than ever that there is only one vice that can't be fixed. The older Chuzzlewits inflict their own punishments, the Jonases and Tigg Montagues are abhorrent, but the law can punish them; the Moulds and Gamps carry diseases, from which we can be saved with proper measures. However, the sleek, smiling, slimy horror that is Pecksniff offers no remedy except for self-defense. Everyone should be against him because he is against everyone; and as Mr. Taine wisely warns us, the virtuous must be careful not to become enablers of his vice. It's a nice but dangerous tendency to see the silver lining in bad situations. It is a common mistake, like that of Tom Pinch, yet rare to find his justifications.
The art with which that delightful character is placed at Mr. Pecksniff's elbow at the beginning of the story, and the help he gives to set fairly afloat the falsehood he innocently believes, contribute to an excellent management of this part of the design; and the same prodigal wealth of invention and circumstance which gives its higher imaginative stamp to the book, appears as vividly in its lesser as in its leading figures. There are wonderful touches of this suggestive kind in the household of Mould the undertaker; and in the vivid picture presented to us by one of Mrs. Gamp's recollections, we are transported to the youthful games of his children. "The sweet creeturs! playing at berryins down in the shop, and follerin' the order-book to its long home in the iron safe!" The American scenes themselves are not more full of life and fun and freshness, and do not contribute more to the general hilarity, than the cockney group at Todgers's; which is itself a little world of the qualities and humours that make up the interest of human life, whether it be high or low, vulgar or fine, filled in with a master's hand. Here, in a mere byestroke as it were, are the very finest things of the earlier books superadded to the new and higher achievement that distinguished the later productions. No part indeed of the execution of this remarkable novel is inferior. Young Bailey and Sweedlepipes are in the front rank of his humorous creations; and poor Mrs. Todgers, worn but not depraved by the cares of gravy and solicitudes of her establishment, with calculation shining out of one eye but affection and goodheartedness[83] still beaming in the other, is in her way quite as perfect a picture as even the portentous Mrs. Gamp with her grim grotesqueness, her filthy habits and foul enjoyments, her thick and damp but most amazing utterances, her moist clammy functions, her pattens, her bonnet, her bundle, and her umbrella. But such prodigious claims must have a special mention.
The skill with which that charming character is introduced at Mr. Pecksniff's side at the story's start, and the support he provides in getting the falsehood he naively believes off the ground, greatly enhance this part of the plot. The same overflowing creativity and detail that gives the book its imaginative quality is just as apparent in its minor characters as it is in the main ones. There are striking examples of this in the household of Mould the undertaker, and in the vivid image painted by one of Mrs. Gamp's memories, we're taken back to the youthful games of his children. "The sweet creatures! playing at burials down in the shop, and following the order-book to its final resting place in the iron safe!" The American scenes themselves are just as lively, fun, and fresh, and add to the overall cheerfulness as much as the cockney group at Todgers's does; it’s like a little world filled with the qualities and quirks that make human life interesting, whether it’s high or low, common or refined, all portrayed with a master’s touch. Here, in a mere aside, are the best elements of the earlier books combined with the new and greater achievements that mark the later works. Indeed, no part of this remarkable novel's execution is lacking. Young Bailey and Sweedlepipes are among his top humorous characters; and poor Mrs. Todgers, exhausted but still kind-hearted by the demands of her gravy and the worries of her establishment, with calculation shining from one eye but affection and warmth still glowing in the other, is just as perfectly depicted as even the memorable Mrs. Gamp with her eerie oddities, filthy habits and unrefined pleasures, her thick and damp yet remarkably expressive speech, her damp and clammy nature, her patten shoes, her bonnet, her bundle, and her umbrella. But such extraordinary portrayals deserve special recognition.
This world-famous personage has passed into and become one with the language, which her own parts of speech have certainly not exalted or refined. To none even of Dickens's characters has there been such a run of popularity; and she will remain among the everlasting triumphs of fiction, a superb masterpiece of English humour. What Mr. Mould says of her in his enthusiasm, that she's the sort of woman one would bury for nothing, and do it neatly too, every one feels to be an appropriate tribute; and this, by a most happy inspiration, is exactly what the genius to whom she owes her existence did, when he called her into life, to the foul original she was taken from. That which enduringly stamped upon his page its most mirth-moving figure, had stamped out of English life for ever one of its disgraces. The mortal Mrs. Gamp was handsomely put into her grave, and only the immortal Mrs. Gamp survived. Age will not wither this one, nor custom stale her variety. In the latter point she has an advantage over even Mr. Pecksniff. She has a friend, an alter ego, whose kind of service to her is expressed by her first utterance in the story; and with this, which introduces her, we may leave her most fitly. "'Mrs. Harris,' I says, at the very last case as ever I acted in, which it was but a young person, 'Mrs.[84] Harris,' I says, 'leave the bottle on the chimley-piece, and don't ask me to take none, but let me put my lips to it when I am so dispoged.' 'Mrs. Gamp,' she says in answer, 'if ever there was a sober creetur to be got at eighteen pence a day for working people, and three and six for gentlefolks—night watching,' said Mrs. Gamp with emphasis, 'being a extra charge—you are that inwallable person.' 'Mrs. Harris,' I says to her, 'don't name the charge, for if I could afford to lay all my fellow-creeturs out for nothink, I would gladly do it, sich is the love I bears 'em.'" To this there is nothing to be added, except that in the person of that astonishing friend every phase of fun and comedy in the character is repeated, under fresh conditions of increased appreciation and enjoyment. By the exuberance of comic invention which gives his distinction to Mr. Pecksniff, Mrs. Gamp profits quite as much; the same wealth of laughable incident which surrounds that worthy man is upon her heaped to overflowing; but over and above this, by the additional invention of Mrs. Harris, it is all reproduced, acted over with renewed spirit, and doubled and quadrupled in her favour. This on the whole is the happiest stroke of humorous art in all the writings of Dickens.
This world-famous character has become so integrated into the language that her original parts of speech certainly haven't elevated or refined it. No one, not even Dickens's characters, has matched her popularity; she will always be remembered as one of the great achievements of fiction, a brilliant example of English humor. What Mr. Mould says about her in his enthusiasm—that she's the kind of woman you’d go through trouble for, and do it well—is something everyone recognizes as a fitting tribute. Interestingly, this is exactly what the genius who created her did when he brought her to life, pulling her from the unpleasant original she was based on. That which permanently marked his page with its most humorous figure also erased one of English life’s embarrassments forever. The real Mrs. Gamp was laid to rest beautifully, and only the timeless Mrs. Gamp remains. Time won’t age her, nor will routine dull her charm. In this regard, she has an edge over even Mr. Pecksniff. She has a friend, an alter ego, whose kind of service to her is revealed in her first line in the story; with this introduction, we can best leave her. “‘Mrs. Harris,’ I said, at the very last case I ever worked on, which was just a young person, ‘Mrs. Harris,’ I said, ‘leave the bottle on the mantelpiece, and don’t ask me to take any, but let me sip from it when I’m in the mood.’ ‘Mrs. Gamp,’ she replied, ‘if there ever was a reliable creature you could get for eighteen pence a day for working folks, and three and six for gentlefolk—night watching,’ Mrs. Gamp said emphatically, ‘being an extra charge—you are that dependable person.’ ‘Mrs. Harris,’ I said to her, ‘don’t mention the fee, because if I could afford to lay all my fellow creatures out for nothing, I’d gladly do it, such is the love I have for them.’” There’s nothing more to add to this, except that in the presence of that remarkable friend, every aspect of fun and comedy in her character is recreated under new conditions of greater appreciation and enjoyment. Thanks to the vibrant comic imagination that distinguishes Mr. Pecksniff, Mrs. Gamp benefits just as much; the same abundance of humorous situations surrounding that kind man is piled onto her. But on top of this, with the added invention of Mrs. Harris, it is all reimagined, performed with renewed energy, and multiplied in her favor. This is, overall, the most brilliant feat of humorous art in all of Dickens's writings.
But this is a chapter of disappointments, and I have now to state, that as Martin Chuzzlewit's success was to seem to him at first only distant and problematical, so even the prodigious immediate success of the Christmas Carol itself was not to be an unmitigated pleasure. Never had a little book an outset so full of[85] brilliancy of promise. Published but a few days before Christmas, it was hailed on every side with enthusiastic greeting. The first edition of six thousand copies was sold the first day, and on the third of January 1844 he wrote to me that "two thousand of the three printed for second and third editions are already taken by the trade." But a very few weeks were to pass before the darker side of the picture came. "Such a night as I have passed!" he wrote to me on Saturday morning the 10th of February. "I really believed I should never get up again, until I had passed through all the horrors of a fever. I found the Carol accounts awaiting me, and they were the cause of it. The first six thousand copies show a profit of £230! And the last four will yield as much more. I had set my heart and soul upon a Thousand, clear. What a wonderful thing it is, that such a great success should occasion me such intolerable anxiety and disappointment! My year's bills, unpaid, are so terrific, that all the energy and determination I can possibly exert will be required to clear me before I go abroad; which, if next June come and find me alive, I shall do. Good Heaven, if I had only taken heart a year ago! Do come soon, as I am very anxious to talk with you. We can send round to Mac after you arrive, and tell him to join us at Hampstead or elsewhere. I was so utterly knocked down last night, that I came up to the contemplation of all these things quite bold this morning. If I can let the house for this season, I will be off to some seaside place as soon as a tenant offers. I am not afraid, if I reduce my expenses; but if I do not, I shall be ruined past all mortal hope of redemption."[86]
But this chapter is filled with disappointments, and I have to point out that while Martin Chuzzlewit's success seemed distant and uncertain at first, even the incredible immediate success of Christmas Carol was not entirely enjoyable. Never had a small book started out with such a dazzling promise. Released just a few days before Christmas, it was met with enthusiastic acclaim everywhere. The first edition of six thousand copies sold out on the first day, and by January 3, 1844, he wrote to me that "two thousand of the three printed for the second and third editions are already taken by the trade." But it was only a few weeks before the darker side of the situation emerged. "What a night I’ve had!" he wrote to me on the morning of Saturday, February 10. "I truly thought I wouldn’t get up again until I’d endured all the horrors of a fever. I found the Carol accounts waiting for me, and they were the cause of it. The first six thousand copies showed a profit of £230! And the last four will likely earn just as much. I had hoped for a clear profit of a thousand. Isn't it amazing that such a huge success could bring me such unbearable anxiety and disappointment? My unpaid bills are so overwhelming that I’ll need all the energy and determination I can muster to get back on my feet before I travel; which, if I’m alive next June, I plan to do. Good heavens, if only I had been more optimistic a year ago! Please come soon, as I’m eager to talk with you. We can reach out to Mac after you arrive and invite him to join us at Hampstead or somewhere else. I was so completely drained last night that I faced all these issues quite boldly this morning. If I can rent the house for the season, I’ll leave for some seaside location as soon as a tenant comes along. I’m not worried if I cut back on my expenses; but if I don’t, I’ll be hopelessly ruined."
The ultimate result was that his publishers were changed, and the immediate result that his departure for Italy became a settled thing; but a word may be said on these Carol accounts before mention is made of his new publishing arrangements.[71] Want of judgment[87] had been shown in not adjusting the expenses of production with a more equable regard to the selling price, but even as it was, before the close of the year, he had received £726 from a sale of fifteen thousand copies; and the difference between this and the amount realised by the same proportion of the sale of the successor to the Carol, undoubtedly justified him in the discontent now expressed. Of that second tale, as well as of the third and fourth, more than double the numbers of the Carol were at once sold, and of course there was no complaint of any want of success: but the truth really was, as to all the Christmas stories issued in this form, that the price charged, while too large for the public addressed by them, was too little to remunerate their outlay; and when in later years he put forth similar fancies for Christmas, charging for them fewer pence than the shillings required for these, he counted his purchasers, with fairly corresponding gains to himself, not by tens but by hundreds of thousands.[72]
The end result was that he switched publishers, and as a direct result, his move to Italy was finalized. However, it's worth discussing the sales from the Carol accounts before addressing his new publishing deals.[71] A lack of judgment[87] was evident in not aligning the production costs with a more balanced view of the selling price. Even so, by the end of the year, he had made £726 from selling fifteen thousand copies; and the difference between this and the earnings from the same percentage of sales of the sequel to the Carol clearly justified his feelings of discontent. For that second story, along with the third and fourth, more than double the number of Carol copies were sold immediately, and there were no complaints about a lack of success. But the reality was, regarding all the Christmas stories published in this way, that the price charged was too high for the audience they were targeting but too low to cover their costs. Later, when he released similar Christmas stories at a much lower price than the shillings charged for these, he found that his buyers numbered not in the tens but in the hundreds of thousands, which also brought him significant profits.[72]
It was necessary now that negotiations should be[88] resumed with his printers, but before any step was taken Messrs. Chapman and Hall were informed of his intention not to open fresh publishing relations with them after Chuzzlewit should have closed. Then followed deliberations and discussions, many and grave, which settled themselves at last into the form of an agreement with Messrs. Bradbury and Evans executed on the first of June 1844; by which, upon advance made to him of £2800, he assigned to them a fourth share in whatever he might write during the next ensuing eight years, to which the agreement was to be strictly limited. There were the usual protecting clauses, but no interest was to be paid, and no obligations were imposed as to what works should be written, if any, or the form of them; the only farther stipulation having reference to the event of a periodical being undertaken whereof Dickens might be only partially editor or author, in which case his proprietorship of copyright and profits was to be two thirds instead of three fourths. There was an understanding, at the time this agreement was signed, that a successor to the Carol would be ready for the Christmas of 1844; but no other promise was asked or made in regard to any other book, nor had he himself decided what form to give to his experiences of Italy, if he should even finally determine to publish them at all.
It was now necessary to resume negotiations with his printers, but before taking any steps, Messrs. Chapman and Hall were notified of his decision not to enter into new publishing relationships with them after Chuzzlewit concluded. This led to many serious discussions that ultimately resulted in an agreement with Messrs. Bradbury and Evans, finalized on June 1, 1844. In this agreement, he received an advance of £2800 in exchange for a fourth share of everything he wrote over the following eight years, which was the timeframe specified in the contract. There were the usual protective clauses, but no interest was to be paid, and there were no obligations regarding what works needed to be written or their format. The only additional stipulation was related to a situation where Dickens might partially edit or author a periodical; in that case, he would own two-thirds of the copyright and profits instead of three-fourths. At the time of signing, there was an understanding that a follow-up to the Carol would be ready for Christmas 1844, but no other promises were made regarding any other books, nor had he decided on how to present his experiences in Italy, if he ultimately chose to publish them at all.
Between this agreement and his journey six weeks elapsed, and there were one or two characteristic incidents before his departure: but mention must first be interposed of the success quite without alloy that also attended the little book, and carried off in excitement and delight every trace of doubt or misgiving.[89]
Between this agreement and his trip, six weeks passed, and there were one or two notable incidents before he left: but it's important to mention the completely unblemished success that also accompanied the little book, which swept away any lingering doubts or worries in excitement and delight.[89]
"Blessings on your kind heart!" wrote Jeffrey to the author of the Carol. "You should be happy yourself, for you may be sure you have done more good by this little publication, fostered more kindly feelings, and prompted more positive acts of beneficence, than can be traced to all the pulpits and confessionals in Christendom since Christmas 1842." "Who can listen," exclaimed Thackeray, "to objections regarding such a book as this? It seems to me a national benefit, and to every man or woman who reads it a personal kindness." Such praise expressed what men of genius felt and said; but the small volume had other tributes, less usual and not less genuine. There poured upon its author daily, all through that Christmas time, letters from complete strangers to him which I remember reading with a wonder of pleasure; not literary at all, but of the simplest domestic kind; of which the general burden was to tell him, amid many confidences about their homes, how the Carol had come to be read aloud there, and was to be kept upon a little shelf by itself, and was to do them all no end of good. Anything more to be said of it will not add much to this.
"Blessings on your kind heart!" wrote Jeffrey to the author of the Carol. "You should be happy yourself, because you can be sure you've done more good with this little publication, inspired more kindness, and encouraged more positive acts of generosity than can be traced to all the pulpits and confessionals in Christendom since Christmas 1842." "Who can listen," exclaimed Thackeray, "to criticisms about a book like this? It seems to me a national treasure, and for every man or woman who reads it, a personal gift." Such praise reflected what great minds felt and said; but the small volume received other tributes, less common yet equally genuine. Throughout that Christmas season, letters from complete strangers poured in daily for its author, which I remember reading with great pleasure; they weren't literary at all, but simply personal; the main message was to share how the Carol had been read aloud in their homes and was going to be kept on a special shelf, doing them a world of good. Anything more to say about it won’t add much to this.
There was indeed nobody that had not some interest in the message of the Christmas Carol. It told the selfish man to rid himself of selfishness; the just man to make himself generous; and the good-natured man to enlarge the sphere of his good nature. Its cheery voice of faith and hope, ringing from one end of the island to the other, carried pleasant warning alike to all, that if the duties of Christmas were wanting no good could come of its outward observances; that it[90] must shine upon the cold hearth and warm it, and into the sorrowful heart and comfort it; that it must be kindness, benevolence, charity, mercy, and forbearance, or its plum pudding would turn to bile, and its roast beef be indigestible.[73] Nor could any man have said it with the same appropriateness as Dickens. What was marked in him to the last was manifest now. He had identified himself with Christmas fancies. Its life and spirits, its humour in riotous abundance, of right belonged to him. Its imaginations as well as kindly thoughts were his; and its privilege to light up with some sort of comfort the squalidest places, he had made his own. Christmas Day was not more social or welcome: New Year's Day not more new: Twelfth Night not more full of characters. The duty of diffusing enjoyment had never been taught by a more abundant, mirthful, thoughtful, ever-seasonable writer.
There was truly no one who didn't have some connection to the message of the Christmas Carol. It encouraged the selfish person to let go of their selfishness; the fair person to become generous; and the kind-hearted person to expand their kindness. Its uplifting message of faith and hope, resonating from one end of the island to the other, served as a friendly reminder to everyone that if the duties associated with Christmas were neglected, no good would come from its outward celebrations; that it[90] had to bring warmth to the cold hearth and comfort to the sorrowful heart; that it had to embody kindness, compassion, charity, mercy, and patience, or its festive pudding would turn bitter, and its roast beef would be hard to digest.[73] No one could have expressed it with the same fittingness as Dickens. What was evident in him until the end was clear now. He had truly connected with the spirit of Christmas. Its essence and joy, along with its abundant humor, rightly belonged to him. Its vivid imaginings as well as generous thoughts were his; and the ability to brighten the dreariest places, he had claimed as his own. Christmas Day was never more sociable or inviting: New Year's Day never felt more fresh: Twelfth Night never had more lively characters. The lesson of spreading joy had never been conveyed by a more spirited, cheerful, thoughtful, and ever-relevant writer.
Something also is to be said of the spirit of the book, and of the others that followed it, which will not anticipate[91] special allusions to be made hereafter. No one was more intensely fond than Dickens of old nursery tales, and he had a secret delight in feeling that he was here only giving them a higher form. The social and manly virtues he desired to teach, were to him not less the charm of the ghost, the goblin, and the fairy fancies of his childhood; however rudely set forth in those earlier days. What now were to be conquered were the more formidable dragons and giants which had their places at our own hearths, and the weapons to be used were of a finer than the "ice-brook's temper." With brave and strong restraints, what is evil in ourselves was to be subdued; with warm and gentle sympathies, what is bad or unreclaimed in others was to be redeemed; the Beauty was to embrace the Beast, as in the divinest of all those fables; the star was to rise out of the ashes, as in our much-loved Cinderella; and we were to play the Valentine with our wilder brothers, and bring them back with brotherly care to civilization and happiness. Nor is it to be doubted, I think, that, in that largest sense of benefit, great public and private service was done; positive, earnest, practical good; by the extraordinary popularity, and nearly universal acceptance, which attended these little holiday volumes. They carried to countless firesides, with new enjoyment of the season, better apprehension of its claims and obligations; they mingled grave with glad thoughts, much to the advantage of both; what seemed almost too remote to meddle with they brought within reach of the charities, and what was near they touched with a dearer tenderness; they comforted the generous, rebuked the sordid, cured folly by kindly[92] ridicule and comic humour, and, saying to their readers Thus you have done, but it were better Thus, may for some have realised the philosopher's famous experience, and by a single fortunate thought revised the whole manner of a life. Criticism here is a second-rate thing, and the reader may be spared such discoveries as it might have made in regard to the Christmas Carol[93].
Something should also be said about the spirit of this book and the others that followed it, which will be elaborated on later. No one loved old nursery tales more than Dickens, and he secretly enjoyed the idea that he was elevating them to a higher level. The social and masculine virtues he wanted to teach were, for him, just as enchanting as the ghosts, goblins, and fairy tales of his childhood, no matter how crudely presented in those early days. What needed to be tackled now were the more daunting dragons and giants that existed in our own lives, using tools far better than the "ice-brook's temper." With strong and brave restraints, we were to conquer the evil within ourselves; with warm and gentle compassion, we were to redeem the flaws or unrefined aspects in others; Beauty was to embrace the Beast, just like in the most divine of those fables; the star was to rise from the ashes, as seen in our beloved Cinderella; and we were to serve as the Valentine for our wilder brothers and guide them back to civilization and happiness with brotherly care. It’s clear, I think, that in a broad sense, significant public and private good was achieved; positive, sincere, practical benefits came from the extraordinary popularity and nearly universal acceptance of these little holiday books. They brought a new enjoyment of the season to countless homes, enhancing understanding of its responsibilities and expectations; they combined serious and joyful thoughts, benefiting both; what seemed too distant to address became manageable through compassion, and what was close was approached with a deeper tenderness; they comforted the generous, chastised the greedy, cured foolishness with gentle ridicule and humor, and, by saying to their readers, You have done this, but it would be better to do that, may have for some fulfilled the philosopher's famous experience, revising their entire approach to life with one fortunate thought. Criticism here has little value, and readers can be spared any insights it might have had regarding the Christmas Carol.
CHAPTER IV.
YEAR OF DEPARTURE FOR ITALY.
1844.
And now, before accompanying Dickens on his Italian travel, one or two parting incidents will receive illustration from his letters. A thoughtful little poem written during the past summer for Lady Blessington has been quoted on a previous page: and it may remind me to say here what warmth of regard he had for her, and for all the inmates of Gore-house; how uninterruptedly joyous and pleasurable were his associations with them; and what valued help they now gave in his preparations for Italy. The poem, as we have seen, was written during a visit made in Yorkshire to the house of Mr. Smithson, already named as the partner of his early companion, Mr. Mitton; and this visit he repeated in sadder circumstances during the present year, when (April 1844) he attended Mr. Smithson's funeral. With members or connections of the family of this friend, his intercourse long continued.
And now, before we join Dickens on his trip to Italy, there are a couple of parting events that will be highlighted from his letters. A charming little poem he wrote last summer for Lady Blessington has been mentioned earlier, which reminds me to note the affection he had for her and everyone at Gore House; how consistently joyful and enjoyable his time with them was; and how much support they provided in his preparations for Italy. The poem, as we saw, was written during a visit to Mr. Smithson's house in Yorkshire, who, as already mentioned, was the partner of his early friend, Mr. Mitton. He visited again under sadder circumstances this year, when he attended Mr. Smithson's funeral in April 1844. He maintained long-lasting interactions with members or relatives of this friend's family.
In the previous February, on the 26th and 28th respectively,[94] he had taken the chair at two great meetings, in Liverpool of the Mechanics' Institution, and in Birmingham of the Polytechnic Institution, to which reference is made by him in a letter of the 21st. I quote the allusion because it shows thus early the sensitive regard to his position as a man of letters, and his scrupulous consideration for the feelings as well as interest of the class, which he manifested in many various and often greatly self-sacrificing ways all through his life. "Advise me on the following point. And as I must write to-night, having already lost a post, advise me by bearer. This Liverpool Institution, which is wealthy and has a high grammar-school the masters of which receive in salaries upwards of £2000 a year (indeed its extent horrifies me; I am struggling through its papers this morning), writes me yesterday by its secretary a business letter about the order of the proceedings on Monday; and it begins thus. 'I beg to send you prefixed, with the best respects of our committee, a bank order for twenty pounds in payment of the expenses contingent on your visit to Liverpool.'—And there, sure enough, it is. Now my impulse was, and is, decidedly to return it. Twenty pounds is not of moment to me; and any sacrifice of independence is worth it twenty times' twenty times told. But haggling in my mind is a doubt whether that would be proper, and not boastful (in an inexplicable way); and whether as an author, I have a right to put myself on a basis which the professors of literature in other forms connected with the Institution cannot afford to occupy. Don't you see? But of course you do. The case stands thus. The Manchester Institution, being in debt,[95] appeals to me as it were in formâ pauperis, and makes no such provision as I have named. The Birmingham Institution, just struggling into life with great difficulty, applies to me on the same grounds. But the Leeds people (thriving) write to me, making the expenses a distinct matter of business; and the Liverpool, as a point of delicacy, say nothing about it to the last minute, and then send the money. Now, what in the name of goodness ought I to do?—I am as much puzzled with the cheque as Colonel Jack was with his gold. If it would have settled the matter to put it in the fire yesterday, I should certainly have done it. Your opinion is requested. I think I shall have grounds for a very good speech at Brummagem; but I am not sure about Liverpool: having misgivings of over-gentility." My opinion was clearly for sending the money back, which accordingly was done.
In the previous February, on the 26th and 28th respectively,[94] he chaired two significant meetings, one in Liverpool for the Mechanics' Institution and another in Birmingham for the Polytechnic Institution, which he mentions in a letter dated the 21st. I quote this reference because it illustrates early on his sensitive awareness of his status as a literary figure, as well as his genuine consideration for the feelings and interests of his peers, which he demonstrated in many significant and often extremely self-sacrificing ways throughout his life. "Please advise me on this matter. Since I need to write tonight, having already missed a deadline, please let me know through the messenger. This Liverpool Institution, which is wealthy and boasts a high grammar school where teachers earn over £2000 a year (the scale of it honestly overwhelms me; I’m going through their documents this morning), sent me a formal business letter yesterday via its secretary about the proceedings for Monday; and it starts with, 'I would like to send you, with the best regards of our committee, a bank order for twenty pounds to cover the expenses related to your visit to Liverpool.'—And there it is. My instinct was, and still is, definitely to return it. Twenty pounds isn't significant to me, and sacrificing my independence is worth far more than that. But I’m wrestling with the question of whether returning it would be appropriate and not come off as boastful (in a strange way); and whether, as an author, I have the right to place myself in a position that others connected with the Institution can’t afford. Do you see what I mean? Of course you do. Here’s the situation. The Manchester Institution, being in debt,[95] appeals to me as if in a state of poverty, and doesn’t provide for such things as I’ve mentioned. The Birmingham Institution, just starting to get established with great difficulty, reaches out to me for similar reasons. But the people in Leeds (doing well) write to me, treating the expenses as a separate business matter; whereas Liverpool, out of courtesy, says nothing about it until the last minute, and then sends the payment. So, what on earth should I do?—I’m as confused with this cheque as Colonel Jack was with his gold. If burning it yesterday would have resolved the issue, I would have definitely done that. I’m seeking your opinion. I think I’ll have material for a solid speech in Birmingham; but I’m uncertain about Liverpool: I have worries about coming across as overly refined." My view was clearly to send the money back, which is what I ultimately did.
Both speeches, duly delivered to enthusiastic listeners at the places named, were good, and both, with suitable variations, had the same theme: telling his popular audience in Birmingham that the principle of their institute, education comprehensive and unsectarian, was the only safe one, for that without danger no society could go on punishing men for preferring vice to virtue without giving them the means of knowing what virtue was; and reminding his genteeler audience in Liverpool, that if happily they had been themselves well taught, so much the more should they seek to extend the benefit to all, since, whatever the precedence due to rank, wealth, or intellect, there was yet a nobility beyond them, expressed unaffectedly by the poet's verse and in the power of education to confer.[96]
Both speeches, delivered to enthusiastic audiences at the specified locations, were effective, and both had the same theme with appropriate variations: addressing his popular crowd in Birmingham, he emphasized that the principle of their institute—education that is comprehensive and non-sectarian—was the only safe approach. He argued that any society that continues to punish individuals for choosing vice over virtue must also provide them with the knowledge of what virtue truly is. He also reminded his more refined audience in Liverpool that if they had been fortunate enough to receive a good education, they should strive to extend that benefit to others. Regardless of the status that comes from rank, wealth, or intellect, there exists a nobility that surpasses these distinctions, which is reflected both in the poet’s words and in the empowering nature of education.[96]
It's only noble to be good:
True hearts are more than coronets,
And simpler faith than Norman blood.
He underwent some suffering, which he might have spared himself, at his return. "I saw the Carol last night," he wrote to me of a dramatic performance of the little story at the Adelphi. "Better than usual, and Wright seems to enjoy Bob Cratchit, but heart-breaking to me. Oh Heaven! if any forecast of this was ever in my mind! Yet O. Smith was drearily better than I expected. It is a great comfort to have that kind of meat under done; and his face is quite perfect." Of what he suffered from these adaptations of his books, multiplied remorselessly at every theatre, I have forborne to speak, but it was the subject of complaint with him incessantly; and more or less satisfied as he was with individual performances, such as Mr. Yates's Quilp or Mantalini and Mrs. Keeley's Smike or Dot, there was only one, that of Barnaby Rudge by the Miss Fortescue who became afterwards Lady Gardner, on which I ever heard him dwell with a thorough liking. It is true that to the dramatizations of his next and other following Christmas stories he gave help himself; but, even then, all such efforts to assist special representations were mere attempts to render more tolerable what he had no power to prevent, and, with a few rare exceptions, they were never very successful. Another and graver wrong was the piracy of his writings, every one of which had been reproduced with merely such colourable changes of title, incidents, and names of characters, as were believed to be sufficient to evade[97] the law and adapt them to "penny" purchasers. So shamelessly had this been going on ever since the days of Pickwick, in so many outrageous ways[74] and with all but impunity, that a course repeatedly urged by Talfourd and myself was at last taken in the present year with the Christmas Carol and the Chuzzlewit pirates. Upon a case of such peculiar flagrancy, however, that the vice-chancellor would not even hear Dickens's counsel; and what it cost our dear friend Talfourd to suppress his speech exceeded by very much the labour and pains with which he had prepared it. "The pirates," wrote Dickens to me, after leaving the court on the 18th of January, "are beaten flat. They are bruised, bloody, battered, smashed, squelched, and utterly undone. Knight Bruce would not hear Talfourd, but instantly gave judgment. He had interrupted Anderdon constantly by asking him to produce a passage which was not an expanded or contracted idea from my book. And at every successive passage he cried out, 'That is Mr. Dickens's case. Find another!' He said that there was not a shadow of doubt upon the matter. That there was no authority which would bear a construction in their favour; the piracy going beyond all previous instances. They[98] might mention it again in a week, he said, if they liked, and might have an issue if they pleased; but they would probably consider it unnecessary after that strong expression of his opinion. Of course I will stand by what we have agreed as to the only terms of compromise with the printers. I am determined that I will have an apology for their affidavits. The other men may pay their costs and get out of it, but I will stick to my friend the author." Two days later he wrote: "The farther affidavits put in by way of extenuation by the printing rascals are rather strong, and give one a pretty correct idea of what the men must be who hold on by the heels of literature. Oh! the agony of Talfourd at Knight Bruce's not hearing him! He had sat up till three in the morning, he says, preparing his speech; and would have done all kinds of things with the affidavits. It certainly was a splendid subject. We have heard nothing from the vagabonds yet. I once thought of printing the affidavits without a word of comment, and sewing them up with Chuzzlewit. Talfourd is strongly disinclined to compromise with the printers on any terms. In which case it would be referred to the master to ascertain what profits had been made by the piracy, and to order the same to be paid to me. But wear and tear of law is my consideration." The undertaking to which he had at last to submit was, that upon ample public apology, and payment of all costs, the offenders should be let go; but the real result was that, after infinite vexation and trouble, he had himself to pay all the costs incurred on his own behalf; and, a couple of years later, upon repetition of the wrong he had suffered[99] in so gross a form that proceedings were again advised by Talfourd and others, he wrote to me from Switzerland the condition of mind to which his experience had brought him. "My feeling about the —— is the feeling common, I suppose, to three fourths of the reflecting part of the community in our happiest of all possible countries; and that is, that it is better to suffer a great wrong than to have recourse to the much greater wrong of the law. I shall not easily forget the expense, and anxiety, and horrible injustice of the Carol case, wherein, in asserting the plainest right on earth, I was really treated as if I were the robber instead of the robbed. Upon the whole, I certainly would much rather not proceed. What do you think of sending in a grave protest against what has been done in this case, on account of the immense amount of piracy to which I am daily exposed, and because I have been already met in the court of chancery with the legal doctrine that silence under such wrongs barred my remedy: to which Talfourd's written opinion might be appended as proof that we stopped under no discouragement. It is useless to affect that I don't know I have a morbid susceptibility of exasperation, to which the meanness and badness of the law in such a matter would be stinging in the last degree. And I know of nothing that could come, even of a successful action, which would be worth the mental trouble and disturbance it would cost."[75]
He went through some pain that he could have avoided when he returned. "I saw the Carol last night," he wrote to me about a dramatic performance of the little story at the Adelphi. "Better than usual, and Wright seems to enjoy Bob Cratchit, but it’s heart-breaking for me. Oh Heaven! If I had ever thought of this! Yet O. Smith was more depressing than I expected. It’s such a relief to have that kind of meat undercooked; and his face is just perfect." I haven't mentioned what he suffered from these adaptations of his books, which multiplied relentlessly at every theater, but he constantly complained about it. While he was somewhat satisfied with individual performances, like Mr. Yates's Quilp or Mantalini and Mrs. Keeley's Smike or Dot, there was only one performance he seemed to truly enjoy, the one of Barnaby Rudge by the Miss Fortescue, who later became Lady Gardner. True, he helped with the dramatizations of his next and other subsequent Christmas stories, but even then, those attempts were just efforts to make bearable what he couldn’t prevent, and with a few rare exceptions, they were never very successful. Another serious issue was the piracy of his writings, each one reproduced with only slight changes to the titles, events, and character names, which were thought to be enough to dodge the law and target "penny" buyers. This had been happening so shamelessly since the days of Pickwick, in so many outrageous ways and with almost no consequences, that a course Talfourd and I repeatedly urged was finally taken this year against the Christmas Carol and Chuzzlewit pirates. However, there was a specific case so blatant that the vice-chancellor refused even to hear Dickens's lawyer; the effort our dear friend Talfourd put into suppressing his speech cost him far more than the effort he had put into preparing it. "The pirates," Dickens wrote to me after leaving court on January 18th, "are completely defeated. They are bruised, bloody, battered, smashed, crushed, and utterly wrecked. Knight Bruce wouldn’t listen to Talfourd, but immediately made his ruling. He kept interrupting Anderdon, asking him to present a passage that wasn't just an expanded or contracted idea from my book. With each successive passage, he yelled, 'That is Mr. Dickens's case. Find another!' He stated that there wasn’t a shadow of doubt on the matter. That there was no authority that would support their case; the piracy exceeded all previous instances. They could mention it again in a week if they wanted, and could have a hearing if they pleased; but they would likely find it unnecessary after that strong statement of his opinion. Of course, I will stand by what we have agreed on regarding the only terms of compromise with the printers. I am determined that I will have an apology for their affidavits. The others might pay their costs and walk away, but I will stick by my friend the author." Two days later he wrote: "The further affidavits put in as excuses by the printing crooks are quite strong and give a pretty accurate idea of what the men must be who cling to the heels of literature. Oh! The agony Talfourd felt at Knight Bruce not hearing him! He had stayed up until three in the morning, he says, prepping his speech; and would have done all kinds of things with the affidavits. It certainly was a grand topic. We haven't heard anything from the scoundrels yet. I once considered publishing the affidavits without any commentary, and binding them with Chuzzlewit. Talfourd is strongly opposed to compromising with the printers on any terms. If that happens, it would be referred to the master to find out what profits have been made from the piracy and to order those profits to be paid to me. But the wear and tear of legal processes is what I worry about." The arrangement he eventually had to accept was that after a full public apology and payment of all costs, the offenders would be let off; but the actual outcome was that, after endless frustration and trouble, he himself had to cover all the costs incurred on his behalf. A couple of years later, when the same offense was repeated in such a blatant manner that legal action was again suggested by Talfourd and others, he wrote to me from Switzerland about how his experiences had changed his mindset. "My feeling about the —— is probably shared by three-quarters of the more thoughtful part of the community in our happiest of all possible countries; that it's better to endure a great injustice than to resort to the much greater injustice of the law. I won't easily forget the expense, anxiety, and horrible injustice of the Carol case, where in asserting the plainest right on earth, I was actually treated as if I were the thief instead of the victim. Overall, I definitely would much rather not take action. What do you think about sending in a formal protest against what has been done in this case, due to the massive amount of piracy I face every day, and because I have already encountered the legal doctrine in the court of chancery that silence in the face of such wrongs invalidates my remedy; to which Talfourd’s written opinion could be added as proof that we didn’t back down under any discouragement? It's pointless to pretend that I’m not aware of my excessive irritation, to which the meanness and injustice of the law in such a case would be incredibly aggravating. And I don’t see anything that could come from even a successful lawsuit that would be worth the mental distress and upheaval it would cause."
A few notes of besetting temptations during his busiest days at Chuzzlewit, one taken from each of the first four months of the year when he was working at its masterly closing scenes, will amusingly exhibit, side by side, his powers of resistance and capacities of enjoyment. "I had written you a line" (16th of January), "pleading Jonas and Mrs. Gamp, but this frosty day tempts me sorely. I am distractingly late; but I[101] look at the sky, think of Hampstead, and feel hideously tempted. Don't come with Mae, and fetch me. I couldn't resist if you did." In the next (18th of February), he is not the tempted, but the tempter. "Stanfield and Mac have come in, and we are going to Hampstead to dinner. I leave Betsey Prig as you know, so don't you make a scruple about leaving Mrs. Harris. We shall stroll leisurely up, to give you time to join us, and dinner will be on the table at Jack Straw's at four. . . . In the very improbable (surely impossible?) case of your not coming, we will call on you at a quarter before eight, to go to the ragged school." The next (5th of March) shows him in yielding mood, and pitying himself for his infirmity of compliance. "Sir, I will—he—he—he—he—he—he—I will not eat with you, either at your own house or the club. But the morning looks bright, and a walk to Hampstead would suit me marvellously. If you should present yourself at my gate (bringing the R. A.'s along with you) I shall not be sapparized. So no more at this writing from Poor Mr. Dickens." But again the tables are turned, and he is tempter in the last; written on that Shakespeare day (23rd of April) which we kept always as a festival, and signed in character expressive of his then present unfitness for any of the practical affairs of life, including the very pressing business which at the moment ought to have occupied him, namely, attention to the long deferred nuptials of Miss Charity Pecksniff. "November blasts! Why it's the warmest, most genial, most intensely bland, delicious, growing, springy, songster-of-the-grovy,[102] bursting-forth-of-the-buddy, day as ever was. At half-past four I shall expect you. Ever, Moddle."
A few notes about the constant temptations he faced during his busiest days at Chuzzlewit, one from each of the first four months of the year when he was working on its masterful closing scenes, will amusingly show both his resistance and his ability to enjoy life. "I had written you a line" (16th of January), "trying to convince Jonas and Mrs. Gamp, but this cold day is really tempting me. I'm running very late; but I[101] look at the sky, think of Hampstead, and feel incredibly tempted. Don't come with Mae to get me. I couldn't say no if you did." In the next note (18th of February), he becomes the tempter. "Stanfield and Mac have arrived, and we’re heading to Hampstead for dinner. I'm leaving Betsey Prig as you know, so don’t feel bad about leaving Mrs. Harris. We’ll stroll leisurely to give you time to join us, and dinner will be ready at Jack Straw’s at four. . . . In the unlikely (surely impossible?) event of you not coming, we’ll stop by at a quarter before eight to head to the ragged school." The next note (5th of March) shows him giving in, feeling sorry for himself over his weakness to comply. "Sir, I will—he—he—he—he—he—he—I will not eat with you, either at your house or the club. But the morning looks bright, and a walk to Hampstead would be wonderful. If you happen to show up at my gate (bringing the R. A.'s with you), I won’t resist. So nothing more at this writing from Poor Dickens." But then the tables turn again, and he becomes the tempter in the last note; written on that Shakespeare day (23rd of April) which we always celebrated, and signed in a way that showed his current unfitness for any practical matters, including the pressing issue that should have occupied him, namely, the long-delayed marriage of Miss Charity Pecksniff. "November winds! Why, it’s the warmest, friendliest, most perfectly pleasant, delightful, blossoming, vibrant, song-filled, [102] most cheerful day ever. I’ll expect you at half-past four. Always, Moddle."
Moddle, the sentimental noodle hooked by Miss Pecksniff who flies on his proposed wedding-day from the frightful prospect before him, the reader of course knows; and has perhaps admired for his last supreme outbreak of common sense. It was a rather favourite bit of humour with Dickens; and I find it pleasant to think that he never saw the description given of it by a trained and skilful French critic, who has been able to pass under his review the whole of English literature without any apparent sense or understanding of one of its most important as well as richest elements. A man without the perception of humour taking English prose literature in hand, can of course set about it only in one way. Accordingly, in Mr. Taine's decisive judgments of our last great humourist, which proceed upon a principle of psychological analysis which it is only fair to say he applies impartially to everybody, Pickwick, Oliver Twist, and The Old Curiosity Shop are not in any manner even named or alluded to; Mrs. Gamp is only once mentioned as always talking of Mrs. Harris; and Mr. Micawber also only once as using always the same emphatic phrases; the largest extracts are taken from the two books in all the Dickens series that are weakest on the humorous side, Hard Times and the Chimes; Nickleby, with its many laughter-moving figures, is dismissed in a line and a half; Mr. Toots, Captain Cuttle, Susan Nipper, Toodles, and the rest have no place in what is said of Dombey; and, to close with what has caused and must excuse my digression, Mr. Augustus Moddle is introduced as a gloomy maniac[103] who makes us laugh and makes us shudder, and as drawn so truly for a madman that though at first sight agreeable, he is in reality horrible![76]
Moddle, the sentimental guy captivated by Miss Pecksniff, runs away on his wedding day from the terrifying future ahead of him, which the reader surely knows and might even admire for his final burst of common sense. This was a favorite comedic moment for Dickens, and I find it nice to think he never came across the description provided by a trained and skilled French critic who has reviewed all of English literature without grasping one of its most significant and rich elements. A person who lacks an understanding of humor tackling English prose can only approach it in one way. As a result, in Mr. Taine's definitive judgments of our last great humorist, which he applies equally to everyone through a principle of psychological analysis, Pickwick, Oliver Twist, and The Old Curiosity Shop aren’t even mentioned or referenced; Mrs. Gamp is only briefly mentioned for always talking about Mrs. Harris, and Mr. Micawber is noted just once for consistently using the same emphatic phrases. The longest excerpts are taken from the two weakest books in the Dickens series regarding humor, Hard Times and The Chimes; Nickleby, with its many laugh-inducing characters, is dismissed in a line and a half. Mr. Toots, Captain Cuttle, Susan Nipper, Toodles, and others are overlooked in the commentary on Dombey; and, to conclude with what has led to—and must excuse—my digression, Mr. Augustus Moddle is depicted as a gloomy maniac who makes us laugh and sends chills down our spines, drawn so accurately for a madman that even though he may seem agreeable at first glance, he is truly horrifying![103]
A month before the letter subscribed by Dickens in the character, so happily unknown to himself, of this gloomy maniac, he had written to me from amidst his famous chapter in which the tables are turned on Pecksniff; but here I quote the letter chiefly for noticeable words at its close. "I heard from Macready by the Hibernia. I have been slaving away regularly, but the weather is against rapid progress. I altered the verbal error, and substituted for the action you didn't like some words expressive of the hurry of the scene. Macready sums up slavery in New Orleans in the way of a gentle doubting on the subject, by a 'but' and a dash. I believe it is in New Orleans that the man is lying under sentence of death, who, not having the fear of God before his eyes, did not deliver up a captive slave[104] to the torture? The largest gun in that country has not burst yet—but it will. Heaven help us, too, from explosions nearer home! I declare I never go into what is called 'society' that I am not aweary of it, despise it, hate it, and reject it. The more I see of its extraordinary conceit, and its stupendous ignorance of what is passing out of doors, the more certain I am that it is approaching the period when, being incapable of reforming itself, it will have to submit to be reformed by others off the face of the earth." Thus we see that the old radical leanings were again rather strong in him at present, and I may add that he had found occasional recent vent for them by writing in the Morning Chronicle.
A month before the letter signed by Dickens in the character of this gloomy maniac—someone he was blissfully unaware of—he had written to me from the middle of his famous chapter where the tables turn on Pecksniff. I’m quoting this letter mainly for the notable words at the end. "I heard from Macready by the Hibernia. I’ve been working hard, but the weather isn’t cooperating with quick progress. I fixed the wording mistake and replaced the action you didn’t like with some phrases that capture the urgency of the scene. Macready summarizes the issue of slavery in New Orleans with a gentle hesitation, using a ‘but’ and a dash. I believe it’s in New Orleans that a man faces execution because, without the fear of God, he didn’t turn over a runaway slave to be tortured? The biggest gun in that country hasn’t gone off yet—but it will. Heaven help us if things explode closer to home! I honestly declare that every time I step into what’s known as 'society,' I feel exhausted by it, scorn it, hate it, and want nothing to do with it. The more I witness its outrageous arrogance and astonishing ignorance of what’s happening outside, the more convinced I am that it’s heading for a time when, unable to reform itself, it will be forced to be reformed by others off the face of the earth." So, we can see that his old radical inclinations are pretty strong again right now, and I should mention that he has recently expressed them occasionally by writing for the Morning Chronicle.
Some articles thus contributed by him having set people talking, the proprietors of the paper rather eagerly mooted the question what payment he would ask for contributing regularly; and ten guineas an article was named. Very sensibly, however, the editor who had succeeded his old friend Black pointed out to him, that though even that sum would not be refused in the heat of the successful articles just contributed, yet (I quote his own account in a letter of the 7th of March 1844) so much would hardly be paid continuously; and thereupon an understanding, was come to, that he would write as a volunteer and leave his payment to be adjusted to the results. "Then said the editor—and this I particularly want you to turn over in your mind, at leisure—supposing me to go abroad, could I contemplate such a thing as the writing of a letter a week under any signature I chose, with such scraps of descriptions and impressions as suggested[105] themselves to my mind? If so, would I do it for the Chronicle? And if so again, what would I do it for? He thought for such contributions Easthope would pay anything. I told him that the idea had never occurred to me; but that I was afraid he did not know what the value of such contributions would be. He repeated what he had said before; and I promised to consider whether I could reconcile it to myself to write such letters at all. The pros and cons need to be very carefully weighed. I will not tell you to which side I incline, but if we should disagree, or waver on the same points, we will call Bradbury and Evans to the council. I think it more than probable that we shall be of exactly the same mind, but I want you to be in possession of the facts and therefore send you this rigmarole." The rigmarole is not unimportant; because, though we did not differ on the wisdom of saying No to the Chronicle, the "council" spoken of was nevertheless held, and in it lay the germ of another newspaper enterprise he permitted himself to engage in twelve months later, to which he would have done more wisely to have also answered No.
Some articles he contributed got people talking, so the paper's owners eagerly discussed what payment he might want for writing regularly; ten guineas per article was suggested. However, the new editor, who had taken over from his old friend Black, pointed out that while that amount might be offered in the excitement of successful articles, it wouldn’t likely be paid continuously (I’m quoting his own account in a letter from March 7, 1844). They then agreed that he would write as a volunteer, with his payment to be determined by the outcomes. "Then the editor said—and I especially want you to think about this at your leisure—if I were to go abroad, could I consider writing a letter a week under any name I chose, including bits of descriptions and impressions that came to mind? If so, would I do it for the Chronicle? And if so, what would I do it for? He thought Easthope would pay anything for such contributions. I told him that the idea had never crossed my mind; but I was afraid he didn’t realize the true value of those contributions. He reiterated what he had said before, and I promised to think about whether I could convince myself to write those letters at all. I need to carefully weigh the pros and cons. I won’t tell you which way I lean, but if we should disagree or have the same concerns, we’ll involve Bradbury and Evans for advice. I think it’s very likely we’ll be on the same page, but I want you to have all the facts, so I’m sending you this lengthy explanation.” The lengthy explanation is significant; because, although we didn’t disagree on the wisdom of saying No to the Chronicle, the "council" mentioned was still held, and it was the beginning of another newspaper venture he allowed himself to pursue a year later, to which he would have been wiser to also say No.
The preparation for departure was now actively going forward, and especially his enquiries for two important adjuncts thereto, a courier and a carriage. As to the latter it occurred to him that he might perhaps get for little money "some good old shabby devil of a coach—one of those vast phantoms that hide themselves in a corner of the Pantechnicon;" and exactly such a one he found there; sitting himself inside it, a perfect Sentimental Traveller, while the managing man told him its history. "As for comfort—let me see—it is[106] about the size of your library; with night-lamps and day-lamps and pockets and imperials and leathern cellars, and the most extraordinary contrivances. Joking apart, it is a wonderful machine. And when you see it (if you do see it) you will roar at it first, and will then proclaim it to be 'perfectly brilliant, my dear fellow.'" It was marked sixty pounds; he got it for five-and-forty; and my own emotions respecting it he had described by anticipation quite correctly. In finding a courier he was even more fortunate; and these successes were followed by a third apparently very promising, but in the result less satisfactory. His house was let to not very careful people.
The preparations for departure were now in full swing, especially his search for two key essentials: a courier and a carriage. As for the carriage, he thought he might be able to snag a “good old shabby coach” for cheap—one of those big, dusty ones hiding in a corner of the storage facility; and he found exactly that. He climbed inside, a true Sentimental Traveler, while the manager shared its history. “As for comfort—let me see—it’s about the size of your library; it’s got night-lights and daytime lights, pockets, storage compartments, and some really unusual features. Jokes aside, it’s a fantastic vehicle. And when you see it (if you actually do see it), you’ll laugh at first and then call it ‘perfectly brilliant, my dear fellow.’” It was listed for sixty pounds, but he got it for forty-five; and he had anticipated my feelings about it perfectly. He was even luckier in finding a courier; these successes were followed by a third opportunity that seemed very promising but turned out to be less so. His house was rented out to some not-so-careful tenants.
The tenant having offered herself for Devonshire-terrace unexpectedly, during the last week or two of his stay in England he went into temporary quarters in Osnaburgh-terrace; and here a domestic difficulty befell of which the mention may be amusing, when I have disposed of an incident that preceded it too characteristic for omission. The Mendicity Society's officers had caught a notorious begging-letter writer, had identified him as an old offender against Dickens of which proofs were found on his person, and had put matters in train for his proper punishment; when the wretched creature's wife made such appeal before the case was heard at the police-court, that Dickens broke down in his character of prosecutor, and at the last moment, finding what was said of the man's distress at the time to be true, relented. "When the Mendicity officers themselves told me the man was in distress, I desired them to suppress what they knew about him, and slipped out of the bundle (in the police office) his first letter, which was the[107] greatest lie of all. For he looked wretched, and his wife had been waiting about the street to see me, all the morning. It was an exceedingly bad case however, and the imposition, all through, very great indeed. Insomuch that I could not say anything in his favour, even when I saw him. Yet I was not sorry that the creature found the loophole for escape. The officers had taken him illegally without any warrant; and really they messed it all through, quite facetiously."
The tenant unexpectedly offered herself for Devonshire Terrace, and during the last week or two of his stay in England, he moved to temporary quarters in Osnaburgh Terrace. Here, a domestic issue arose that might seem amusing once I cover an incident that’s too characteristic to leave out. The Mendicity Society's officers had caught a well-known begging-letter writer, identified him as a repeat offender against Dickens, with proof found on him, and had started the process for his punishment. However, the poor man's wife made such an appeal before the case went to the police court that Dickens faltered in his role as prosecutor. In the end, discovering that what was said about the man’s distress was true, he had a change of heart. “When the Mendicity officers themselves told me the man was in distress, I asked them to hide what they knew about him and removed his first letter from the bundle (in the police office), which was the greatest lie of all. He looked miserable, and his wife had been waiting around the street to see me all morning. It was a really bad case, though, and the deception was quite significant. So much so that I couldn’t say anything in his favor, even after I saw him. Yet, I wasn’t upset that the poor man found a way to escape. The officers had arrested him without a warrant, and they really messed it all up in a rather comical way.”
He will himself also best relate the small domestic difficulty into which he fell in his temporary dwelling, upon his unexpectedly discovering it to be unequal to the strain of a dinner party for which invitations had gone out just before the sudden "let" of Devonshire-terrace. The letter is characteristic in other ways, or I should hardly have gone so far into domesticities here; and it enables me to add that with the last on its list of guests, Mr. Chapman the chairman of Lloyd's, he held much friendly intercourse, and that few things more absurd or unfounded have been invented, even of Dickens, than that he found any part of the original of Mr. Dombey in the nature, the appearance, or the manners of this estimable gentleman. "Advise, advise," he wrote (9 Osnaburgh-terrace, 28th of May 1844), "advise with a distracted man. Investigation below stairs renders it, as my father would say, 'manifest to any person of ordinary intelligence, if the term may be considered allowable,' that the Saturday's dinner cannot come off here with safety. It would be a toss-up, and might come down heads, but it would put us into an agony with that kind of people. . . . Now, I feel a difficulty in dropping it altogether, and really fear that this[108] might have an indefinably suspicious and odd appearance. Then said I at breakfast this morning, I'll send down to the Clarendon. Then says Kate, have it at Richmond. Then I say, that might be inconvenient to the people. Then she says, how could it be if we dine late enough? Then I am very much offended without exactly knowing why; and come up here, in a state of hopeless mystification. . . . What do you think? Ellis would be quite as dear as anybody else; and unless the weather changes, the place is objectionable. I must make up my mind to do one thing or other, for we shall meet Lord Denman at dinner to-day. Could it be dropped decently? That, I think very doubtful. Could it be done for a couple of guineas apiece at the Clarendon? . . . In a matter of more importance I could make up my mind. But in a matter of this kind I bother and bewilder myself, and come to no conclusion whatever. Advise! Advise! . . . List of the Invited. There's Lord Normanby. And there's Lord Denman. There's Easthope, wife, and sister. There's Sydney Smith. There's you and Mac. There's Babbage. There's a Lady Osborne and her daughter. There's Southwood Smith. And there's Quin. And there are Thomas Chapman and his wife. So many of these people have never dined with us, that the fix is particularly tight. Advise! Advise!" My advice was for throwing over the party altogether, but additional help was obtained and the dinner went off very pleasantly. It was the last time we saw Sydney Smith.
He will explain the small domestic issue he faced in his temporary home when he unexpectedly realized it wasn’t suitable for the dinner party for which invitations had already been sent out right before the sudden rental of Devonshire-terrace. The letter is revealing in other ways, or I wouldn’t have shared these personal details; it also allows me to mention that he had a friendly relationship with Mr. Chapman, the chairman of Lloyd's, and that few things are more ridiculous or unfounded than the idea that any part of Mr. Dombey's character came from this respected gentleman. "Advise, advise,” he wrote (9 Osnaburgh-terrace, 28th of May 1844), “advise a frazzled man. Investigation downstairs makes it, as my father would put it, ‘obvious to anyone with ordinary intelligence, if that term can be accepted,’ that Saturday’s dinner cannot safely happen here. It would be a gamble, and while it could work out fine, it would put us in a tough spot with that crowd... Now, I feel hesitant to abandon it entirely, and I'm genuinely worried that this might seem oddly suspicious. This morning at breakfast, I said I’d book the Clarendon. Then Kate suggested Richmond. I said that could be inconvenient for the guests. She replied, how could it be if we dine late enough? I got quite annoyed without really understanding why and ended up here, completely confused... What do you think? Ellis would be just as expensive as anyone else; and unless the weather changes, the location is a concern. I need to decide on something, as we’re meeting Lord Denman for dinner today. Could we cancel without it being too awkward? I think that’s very unlikely. Could we do it for about two guineas each at the Clarendon?... In more important matters, I could make a decision. But when it comes to this, I stress myself out and don’t come to any conclusion at all. Advise! Advise!... List of the Invited. There’s Lord Normanby. And there’s Lord Denman. There’s Easthope, his wife, and sister. There’s Sydney Smith. There’s you and Mac. There’s Babbage. There’s Lady Osborne and her daughter. There’s Southwood Smith. And there’s Quin. And there are Thomas Chapman and his wife. So many of these people have never dined with us that the situation is particularly tricky. Advise! Advise!" My advice was to cancel the party altogether, but additional help was enlisted and the dinner ended up being very enjoyable. It was the last time we saw Sydney Smith.
Of one other characteristic occurrence he wrote before he left; and the very legible epigraph round the seal of his letter, "It is particularly requested that[109] if Sir James Graham should open this, he will not trouble himself to seal it again," expresses both its date and its writer's opinion of a notorious transaction of the time. "I wish" (28th of June) "you would read this, and give it me again when we meet at Stanfield's to-day. Newby has written to me to say that he hopes to be able to give Overs more money than was agreed on." The enclosure was the proof-sheet of a preface written by him to a small collection of stories by a poor carpenter dying of consumption, who hoped by their publication, under protection of such a name, to leave behind him some small provision for his ailing wife and little children.[77] The book was dedicated to the kind physician, Doctor Elliotson, whose name was for nearly thirty years a synonym with us all for unwearied, self-sacrificing, beneficent service to every one in need.
Of another significant event, he wrote before he left; and the clearly legible note around the seal of his letter, "It is especially requested that[109] if Sir James Graham opens this, he won't bother to seal it again," indicates both its date and the writer's opinion on a well-known incident of the time. "I wish" (June 28) "you would read this and return it to me when we meet at Stanfield's today. Newby told me that he hopes to be able to give Overs more money than was originally agreed upon." The enclosed document was the proof-sheet of a preface he wrote for a small collection of stories by a poor carpenter dying of tuberculosis, who hoped that by publishing them under such a reputable name, he could leave some financial support for his sick wife and young children.[77] The book was dedicated to the compassionate doctor, Doctor Elliotson, whose name was synonymous with tireless, selfless, and generous service to everyone in need for nearly thirty years.
The last incident before Dickens's departure was a farewell dinner to him at Greenwich, which took also the form of a celebration for the completion of Chuzzlewit[110], or, as the Ballantynes used to call it in Scott's case, a christening dinner; when Lord Normanby took the chair, and I remember sitting next the great painter Turner, who had come with Stanfield, and had enveloped his throat, that sultry summer day, in a huge red belcher-handkerchief which nothing would induce him to remove. He was not otherwise demonstrative, but enjoyed himself in a quiet silent way, less perhaps at the speeches than at the changing lights on the river. Carlyle did not come; telling me in his reply to the invitation that he truly loved Dickens, having discerned in the inner man of him a real music of the genuine kind, but that he'd rather testify to this in some other form than that of dining out in the dogdays.
The last event before Dickens left was a farewell dinner for him at Greenwich, which also celebrated the completion of Chuzzlewit[110]—or, as the Ballantynes used to refer to it in Scott's case, a christening dinner. Lord Normanby was the host, and I remember sitting next to the famous painter Turner, who had come with Stanfield. On that sultry summer day, Turner wrapped his throat in a huge red belcher handkerchief that he refused to take off. He wasn't very expressive, but he seemed to enjoy himself quietly, perhaps more because of the changing lights on the river than the speeches. Carlyle didn't attend; he told me in his reply to the invitation that he genuinely loved Dickens and recognized a real kind of music in his character, but he’d rather express that in another way than by dining out in the heat of summer.
CHAPTER V.
IDLENESS AT ALBARO: VILLA BAGNERELLO.
1844.
The travelling party arrived at Marseilles on the evening of Sunday the 14th of July. Not being able to get vetturino horses in Paris, they had come on, post; paying for nine horses but bringing only four, and thereby saving a shilling a mile out of what the four would have cost in England. So great thus far, however, had been the cost of travel, that "what with distance, caravan, sight-seeing, and everything," two hundred pounds would be nearly swallowed up before they were at their destination. The success otherwise had been complete. The children had not cried in their worst troubles, the carriage had gone lightly over abominable roads, and the courier had proved himself a perfect gem. "Surrounded by strange and perfectly novel circumstances," Dickens wrote to me from Marseilles,[112] "I feel as if I had a new head on side by side with my old one."
The traveling group arrived in Marseilles on the evening of Sunday, July 14th. Unable to find carriage horses in Paris, they continued on, paying for nine horses but only using four, saving a shilling per mile compared to what the four would have cost in England. However, the cost of travel had been so high that "considering distance, caravan, sightseeing, and everything," two hundred pounds would be almost entirely used up before they reached their destination. Otherwise, the trip had been a success. The children hadn't cried during their toughest moments, the carriage handled the terrible roads well, and the courier proved to be a perfect gem. "Surrounded by strange and completely new circumstances," Dickens wrote to me from Marseilles,[112] "I feel as if I have a new head alongside my old one."
To what shrewd and kindly observation the old one had helped him at every stage of his journey, his published book of travel tells, and of all that there will be nothing here; but a couple of experiences at his outset, of which he told me afterwards, have enough character in them to be worth mention.
To what sharp and caring observation the old one had assisted him at every stage of his journey, his published travel book reveals, and of all that, there will be nothing here; but a couple of experiences at the beginning, which he told me later, have enough character to be worth mentioning.
Shortly before there had been some public interest about the captain of a Boulogne steamer apprehended on a suspicion of having stolen specie, but reinstated by his owners after a public apology to him on their behalf; and Dickens had hardly set foot on the boat that was to carry them across, when he was attracted by the look of its captain, and discovered him after a few minutes' talk to be that very man. "Such an honest, simple, good fellow, I never saw," said Dickens, as he imitated for me the homely speech in which his confidences were related. The Boulogne people, he said, had given him a piece of plate, "but Lord bless us! it took a deal more than that to get him round again in his own mind; and for weeks and weeks he was uncommon low to be sure. Newgate, you see! What a place for a sea-faring man as had held up his head afore the best on 'em, and had more friends, I mean to say, and I do tell you the daylight truth, than any man on this station—ah! or any other, I don't care where!"
Shortly before, there had been some public interest in the captain of a Boulogne steamer who was arrested on suspicion of stealing money, but his owners reinstated him after publicly apologizing on his behalf. Dickens had barely stepped onto the boat that would take them across when he was struck by the appearance of its captain and, after chatting for a few minutes, realized he was that very man. "What a genuinely honest, simple, good guy he was," Dickens said, mimicking the down-to-earth way he shared his thoughts. The people of Boulogne had given him a piece of silverware, "but my goodness! It took a lot more than that to help him feel good about himself again; he was pretty low for weeks. Newgate, you see! What a place for a sailor who had once held his head high among the best, and who had more friends, honestly, than any man at this station—or anywhere else, for that matter!"
His first experience in a foreign tongue he made immediately on landing, when he had gone to the bank for money, and after delivering with most laborious distinctness a rather long address in French to the clerk behind the counter, was disconcerted by that functionary's[113] cool enquiry in the native-born Lombard-street manner, "How would you like to take it, sir?" He took it, as everybody must, in five-franc pieces, and a most inconvenient coinage he found it; for he required so much that he had to carry it in a couple of small sacks, and was always "turning hot about suddenly" taking it into his head that he had lost them.
His first experience with a foreign language happened right after he landed, when he went to the bank for some cash. After carefully delivering a fairly long speech in French to the clerk behind the counter, he was taken aback by the clerk's cool question in the local Lombard-street style, "How would you like to take it, sir?" He took it, like everyone else has to, in five-franc coins, which he found to be incredibly inconvenient. He needed so much money that he had to carry it in a couple of small bags and was always getting anxious, suddenly thinking he had lost them.
The evening of Tuesday the 16th of July saw him in a villa at Albaro, the suburb of Genoa in which, upon the advice of our Gore-house friends, he had resolved to pass the summer months before taking up his quarters in the city. His wish was to have had Lord Byron's house there, but it had fallen into neglect and become the refuge of a third-rate wine-shop. The matter had then been left to Angus Fletcher who just now lived near Genoa, and he had taken at a rent absurdly above its value[78] an unpicturesque and uninteresting[114] dwelling, which at once impressed its new tenant with its likeness to a pink jail. "It is," he said to me, "the most perfectly lonely, rusty, stagnant old staggerer of a domain that you can possibly imagine. What would I give if you could only look round the courtyard! I look down into it, whenever I am near that side of the house, for the stable is so full of 'vermin and swarmers' (pardon the quotation from my inimitable friend) that I always expect to see the carriage going out bodily, with legions of industrious fleas harnessed to and drawing it off, on their own account. We have a couple of Italian work-people in our establishment; and to hear one or other of them talking away to our servants with the utmost violence and volubility in Genoese, and our servants answering with great fluency in English (very loud: as if the others were only deaf, not Italian), is one of the most ridiculous things possible. The effect is greatly enhanced by the Genoese manner, which is exceedingly animated and pantomimic; so that two friends of the lower class conversing pleasantly in the street, always seem on the eve of stabbing each other forthwith. And a stranger is immensely astonished at their not doing it."
The evening of Tuesday, July 16th, found him in a villa in Albaro, the suburb of Genoa where, on the advice of our friends from Gore House, he decided to spend the summer before moving into the city. He had hoped to stay at Lord Byron's house there, but it had fallen into disrepair and turned into a rundown wine shop. The situation had then been handed over to Angus Fletcher, who was living near Genoa at the time, and he had rented a completely unremarkable and unattractive place for an absurdly high price, which immediately struck its new tenant as resembling a pink jail. "It is," he said to me, "the most perfectly lonely, rusty, stagnant old dump you can imagine. I'd give anything for you to see the courtyard! I look down into it whenever I’m near that side of the house, because the stable is so infested with 'vermin and swarmers' (forgive the quote from my inimitable friend) that I always expect to see the carriage being pulled away by a swarm of fleas, doing it all themselves. We have a couple of Italian workers in our place, and it’s hilarious to hear one of them angrily chatting away with our servants in Genoese while our servants reply fluently in English (very loudly, as if the Italians were just deaf, not speaking another language). The whole thing is made even funnier by the animated, almost theatrical way the Genoese talk; two lower-class friends chatting happily in the street always look like they’re about to stab each other at any moment. And a stranger is completely shocked that they don’t actually do it."
The heat tried him less than he expected, excepting always the sirocco, which, near the sea as they were, and right in the course of the wind as it blew against the house, made everything hotter than if there had been no wind. "One feels it most, on first getting up. Then, it is really so oppressive that a strong determination is necessary to enable one to go on dressing; one's tendency being to tumble down anywhere and lie there." It seemed to hit him, he said, behind the[115] knee, and made his legs so shake that he could not walk or stand. He had unfortunately a whole week of this without intermission, soon after his arrival; but then came a storm, with wind from the mountains; and he could bear the ordinary heat very well. What at first had been a home-discomfort, the bare walls, lofty ceilings, icy floors, and lattice blinds, soon became agreeable; there were regular afternoon breezes from the sea; in his courtyard was a well of very pure and very cold water; there were new milk and eggs by the bucketful, and, to protect from the summer insects these and other dainties, there were fresh vine-leaves by the thousand; and he satisfied himself, by the experience of a day or two in the city, that he had done well to come first to its suburb by the sea. What startled and disappointed him most were the frequent cloudy days.[79] He opened his third letter (3rd of August) by telling me there was a thick November fog, that rain was pouring incessantly, and that he did not remember to have seen in his life, at that time of year, such cloudy weather as he had seen beneath Italian skies.
The heat wasn’t as bad as he expected, except for the sirocco, which, since they were close to the sea and right in the path of the wind blowing against the house, made everything feel hotter than if there was no wind at all. "You really feel it the most when you first get up. It can be so stifling that you really have to force yourself to keep getting dressed; you just want to collapse anywhere and stay there." He said it felt like it hit him behind the knee, making his legs shake so much that he could hardly walk or stand. Unfortunately, he had to deal with a full week of this without a break right after he arrived; but then a storm came in with wind from the mountains, and he found he could handle the regular heat just fine. What had initially been an uncomfortable home with bare walls, high ceilings, cold floors, and lattice blinds soon became pleasant; there were regular afternoon breezes from the sea; in his courtyard was a well with very pure and very cold water; there were buckets of fresh milk and eggs, and to protect these and other treats from summer insects, there were fresh vine leaves in abundance; after spending a day or two in the city, he confirmed that it was a good decision to start off in its seaside suburb. What shocked and let him down the most were the frequent cloudy days. He opened his third letter (3rd of August) by telling me there was a thick November fog, that rain was falling nonstop, and that he couldn’t remember ever seeing, at that time of year, such cloudy weather under Italian skies.
"The story goes that it is in autumn and winter, when other countries are dark and foggy, that the beauty and clearness of this are most observable. I[116] hope it may prove so; for I have postponed going round the hills which encircle the city, or seeing any of the sights, until the weather is more favourable.[80] I have never yet seen it so clear, for any longer time of the day together, as on a bright, lark-singing, coast-of-France-discerning day at Broadstairs; nor have I ever seen so fine a sunset, throughout, as is very common there. But the scenery is exquisite, and at certain periods of the evening and the morning the blue of the Mediterranean surpasses all conception or description. It is the most intense and wonderful colour, I do believe, in all nature."
"The story goes that it’s in autumn and winter, when other countries are dark and foggy, that the beauty and clarity of this place are most noticeable. I[116] hope that proves to be true; I've held off on exploring the hills surrounding the city or seeing any of the sights until the weather is better.[80] I’ve never seen it this clear for such a long time during the day, except on a bright, lark-singing day at Broadstairs, when you can see the coast of France; nor have I ever witnessed such a beautiful sunset, which is quite common there. The scenery is stunning, and at certain times of the evening and morning, the blue of the Mediterranean exceeds all imagination or description. It’s the most intense and incredible color, I believe, in all of nature."
In his second letter from Albaro there was more of this subject; and an outbreak of whimsical enthusiasm in it, meant especially for Maclise, is followed by some capital description. "I address you, my friend," he wrote, "with something of the lofty spirit of an exile, a banished commoner, a sort of Anglo-Pole. I don't exactly know what I have done for my country in coming away from it, but I feel it is something; something great; something virtuous and heroic. Lofty emotions rise within me, when I see the sun set on the blue Mediterranean.[117] I am the limpet on the rock. My father's name is Turner, and my boots are green. . . . Apropos of blue. In a certain picture called the Serenade for which Browning wrote that verse[81] in Lincoln's-inn-fields, you, O Mac, painted a sky. If you ever have occasion to paint the Mediterranean, let it be exactly of that colour. It lies before me now, as deeply and intensely blue. But no such colour is above me. Nothing like it. In the south of France, at Avignon, at Aix, at Marseilles, I saw deep blue skies; and also in America. But the sky above me is familiar to my sight. Is it heresy to say that I have seen its twin brother shining through the window of Jack Straw's—that down in Devonshire-terrace I have seen a better sky? I dare say it is; but like a great many other heresies, it is true. . . . But such green, green, green, as flutters in the vineyard down below the windows, that I never saw; nor yet such lilac and such purple as float between me and the distant hills; nor yet in anything, picture, book, or vestal boredom, such awful, solemn, impenetrable blue, as in that same sea. It has such an absorbing, silent, deep, profound effect, that I can't help thinking it suggested the idea of Styx. It looks as if a draught of it, only so much as you[118] could scoop up on the beach in the hollow of your hand, would wash out everything else, and make a great blue blank of your intellect. . . . When the sun sets clearly, then, by Heaven, it is majestic. From any one of eleven windows here, or from a terrace overgrown with grapes, you may behold the broad sea, villas, houses, mountains, forts, strewn with rose leaves. Strewn with them? Steeped in them! Dyed, through and through and through. For a moment. No more. The sun is impatient and fierce (like everything else in these parts), and goes down headlong. Run to fetch your hat—and it's night. Wink at the right time of black night—and it's morning. Everything is in extremes. There is an insect here that chirps all day. There is one outside the window now. The chirp is very loud: something like a Brobdingnagian grasshopper. The creature is born to chirp; to progress in chirping; to chirp louder, louder, louder; till it gives one tremendous chirp and bursts itself. That is its life and death. Everything is 'in a concatenation accordingly.' The day gets brighter, brighter, brighter, till it's night. The summer gets hotter, hotter, hotter, till it explodes. The fruit gets riper, riper, riper, till it tumbles down and rots. . . . Ask me a question or two about fresco: will you be so good? All the houses are painted in fresco, hereabout (the outside walls I mean, the fronts, backs, and sides), and all the colour has run into damp and green seediness; and the very design has straggled away into the component atoms of the plaster. Beware of fresco! Sometimes (but not often) I can make out a Virgin with a mildewed glory round her head, holding nothing in an undiscernible lap with[119] invisible arms; and occasionally the leg or arm of a cherub. But it is very melancholy and dim. There are two old fresco-painted vases outside my own gate, one on either hand, which are so faint that I never saw them till last night; and only then, because I was looking over the wall after a lizard who had come upon me while I was smoking a cigar above, and crawled over one of these embellishments in his retreat. . . ."
In his second letter from Albaro, he shared more about this topic, and a burst of whimsical excitement aimed particularly at Maclise is followed by some excellent descriptions. "I’m writing to you, my friend," he said, "with a bit of the proud spirit of an exile, a banished commoner, kind of like an Anglo-Pole. I’m not really sure what I’ve done for my country by leaving it, but I feel like it’s something important; something great; something good and brave. I get these lofty feelings inside when I see the sun setting over the blue Mediterranean.[117] I’m like the limpet on the rock. My dad’s name is Turner, and my boots are green. . . . Speaking of blue. In a certain painting called the Serenade, for which Browning wrote that line[81] in Lincoln's-inn-fields, you, O Mac, painted a sky. If you ever get the chance to paint the Mediterranean, make sure it’s exactly that color. It’s right in front of me now, as deep and intense a blue as I’ve ever seen. But there’s no such color above me. Nothing like it. In the south of France, in Avignon, Aix, and Marseilles, I saw deep blue skies; also in America. But the sky above me feels familiar. Is it crazy to say I’ve seen its twin shining through the window of Jack Straw's—that back in Devonshire-terrace I’ve seen a better sky? I guess it is; but like many other crazy things, it’s true. . . . But such green, green, green, as flutters in the vineyard below my windows, that I’ve never seen; nor such lilac and purple as float between me and the distant hills; nor anything, picture, book, or boring moment, that has such awful, serious, impenetrable blue, as in that same sea. It has such a captivating, silent, deep, profound effect that I can’t help but think it inspired the idea of Styx. It looks as if a sip of it, just a little of what you [118] could scoop up on the beach in your hand, would wash away everything else and create a big blue void in your mind. . . . When the sun sets clearly, it’s simply majestic. From any of eleven windows here, or from a terrace overgrown with grapes, you can see the wide sea, villas, houses, mountains, and forts all covered in rose petals. Covered? Steeped in them! Dyed, all the way through! Just for a moment. No more. The sun is impatient and fierce (like everything else around here) and drops down quickly. Run to grab your hat—and suddenly it’s night. Blink at the right time of the pitch-black night—and it’s morning. Everything is extreme. There’s an insect here that chirps all day. There’s one outside my window right now. The chirp is really loud: like a gigantic grasshopper. The creature is born to chirp; to progress in chirping; to chirp louder, louder, louder; until it gives one huge chirp and bursts. That’s its life and death. Everything is 'in a concatenation accordingly.' The day gets brighter, brighter, brighter, until it’s night. The summer gets hotter, hotter, hotter, until it explodes. The fruit gets riper, riper, riper, until it falls off and rots. . . . Ask me a question or two about fresco: would you be so kind? All the houses around here are painted in fresco (the outside walls I mean, the fronts, backs, and sides), and all the color has faded into dampness and green decay; and even the design has strayed away into the tiny particles of the plaster. Beware of fresco! Sometimes (but not often) I can make out a Virgin with a moldy halo around her head, holding nothing in an indistinguishable lap with[119] invisible arms; and occasionally the leg or arm of a cherub. But it all feels very melancholy and dim. There are two old fresco-painted vases outside my own gate, one on each side, which are so faded that I never noticed them until last night; and only then because I was looking over the wall after a lizard that had come across me while I was smoking a cigar above, and crawled over one of these decorations in its escape. . . ."
That letter sketched for me the story of his travel through France, and I may at once say that I thus received, from week to week, the "first sprightly runnings" of every description in his Pictures from Italy. But my rule as to the American letters must be here observed yet more strictly; and nothing resembling his printed book, however distantly, can be admitted into these pages. Even so my difficulty of rejection will not be less; for as he had not actually decided, until the very last, to publish his present experiences at all, a larger number of the letters were left unrifled by him. He had no settled plan from the first, as in the other case.
That letter gave me a glimpse into his travels through France, and I can say right away that I received, week by week, the "first lively updates" of everything in his Pictures from Italy. However, I must stick even more closely to my rule regarding the American letters; nothing that resembles his published work, even slightly, can be included in these pages. Still, my struggle with rejection won’t be any easier; since he hadn’t really decided until the very end to publish his current experiences at all, a larger number of the letters were left untouched by him. He didn’t have a clear plan from the beginning, unlike in the other case.
His most valued acquaintance at Albaro was the French consul-general, a student of our literature who had written on his books in one of the French reviews, and who with his English wife lived in the very next villa, though so oddly shut away by its vineyard that to get from the one adjoining house to the other was a mile's journey.[82] Describing, in that August letter, his first call from this new friend thus pleasantly self-recommended, he makes the visit his excuse for breaking off[120] from a facetious description of French inns to introduce to me a sketch, from a pencil outline by Fletcher, of what bore the imposing name of the Villa di Bella vista, but which he called by the homelier one of its proprietor, Bagnerello. "This, my friend, is quite accurate. Allow me to explain it. You are standing, sir, in our vineyard, among the grapes and figs. The Mediterranean is at your back as you look at the house: of which two sides, out of four, are here depicted. The lower story (nearly concealed by the vines) consists of the hall, a wine-cellar, and some store-rooms. The three windows on the left of the first floor belong to the sala, lofty and whitewashed, which has two more windows round the corner. The fourth window did belong to the dining-room, but I have changed one of the nurseries for better air; and it now appertains to that branch of the establishment. The fifth and sixth, or two right-hand windows, sir, admit the light to the inimitable's (and uxor's) chamber; to which the first window round the right-hand corner, which you perceive in shadow, also belongs. The next window in shadow, young sir, is the bower of Miss H. The next, a nursery window; the same having two more round the corner again. The bowery-looking place stretching out upon the left of the house is the terrace, which opens out from a French window in the drawing-room on the same floor, of which you see nothing: and forms one side of the court-yard. The upper windows belong to some of those uncounted chambers upstairs; the fourth one, longer than the rest, being in F.'s bedroom. There is a kitchen or two up there besides, and my dressing-room; which you can't see from this point[121] of view. The kitchens and other offices in use are down below, under that part of the house where the roof is longest. On your left, beyond the bay of Genoa, about two miles off, the Alps stretch off into the far horizon; on your right, at three or four miles distance, are mountains crowned with forts. The intervening space on both sides is dotted with villas, some green, some red, some yellow, some blue, some (and ours among the number) pink. At your back, as I have said, sir, is the ocean; with the slim Italian tower of the ruined church of St. John the Baptist rising up before it, on the top of a pile of savage rocks. You go through the court-yard, and out at the gate, and down a narrow lane to the sea. Note. The sala goes sheer up to the top of the house; the ceiling being conical, and the[122] little bedrooms built round the spring of its arch. You will observe that we make no pretension to architectural magnificence, but that we have abundance of room. And here I am, beholding only vines and the sea for days together. . . . Good Heavens! How I wish you'd come for a week or two, and taste the white wine at a penny farthing the pint. It is excellent." . . . Then, after seven days: "I have got my paper and inkstand and figures now (the box from Osnaburgh-terrace only came last Thursday), and can think—I have begun to do so every morning—with a business-like air, of the Christmas book. My paper is arranged, and my pens are spread out in the usual form. I think you know the form—Don't you? My books have not passed the custom-house yet, and I tremble for some volumes of Voltaire. . . . I write in the best bedroom. The sun is off the corner window at the side of the house by a very little after twelve; and I can then throw the blinds open, and look up from my paper, at the sea, the mountains, the washed-out villas, the vineyards, at the blistering white hot fort with a sentry on the drawbridge standing in a bit of shadow no broader than his own musket, and at the sky, as often as I like. It is a very peaceful view, and yet a very cheerful one. Quiet as quiet can be."
His closest friend at Albaro was the French consul-general, a literature enthusiast who had written about our books in a French review. He lived with his English wife in the villa right next door, but it was so separated by its vineyard that getting from one house to the other was a mile's journey.[82] In that August letter, he described his first visit from this friend who had introduced himself so nicely, using the visit as an excuse to shift from a humorous description of French inns and to share a sketch, based on a pencil outline by Fletcher, of what was grandly called the Villa di Bella vista, which he referred to more casually as Bagnerello. "My friend, this is quite accurate. Let me explain. You are standing in our vineyard, surrounded by the grapes and figs. The Mediterranean is at your back as you look toward the house, of which two sides out of four are depicted here. The lower story (mostly hidden by the vines) includes a hall, a wine cellar, and some storage rooms. The three windows on the left of the first floor belong to the sala, which is tall and whitewashed, with two additional windows around the corner. The fourth window used to belong to the dining room, but I swapped one of the nurseries for better air; so now it belongs there. The fifth and sixth, or the two windows on the right, let light into the chamber of the inimitable (and his wife); the first window around the right corner, which you see in shadow, also belongs to it. The next window in shadow is Miss H.'s bower. The following one is a nursery window, with two more around the corner again. The space that looks like a bower extending to the left of the house is the terrace, which opens from a French window in the drawing room on the same floor, which you can't see; it forms one side of the courtyard. The upper windows belong to some of the many rooms upstairs; the fourth one, longer than the others, is in F.'s bedroom. There are one or two kitchens up there too, and my dressing room, which you can't see from this viewpoint. The kitchens and other working areas are down below, beneath the part of the house where the roof is the longest. On your left, beyond the bay of Genoa, about two miles away, the Alps stretch into the far horizon; on your right, three or four miles off, are mountains topped with forts. The space in between on both sides is dotted with villas of various colors—some green, some red, some yellow, some blue—and ours is among the pink ones. Behind you, as I said, is the ocean, with the slender Italian tower of the ruined church of St. John the Baptist rising before it, sitting atop a pile of rugged rocks. You walk through the courtyard, out at the gate, and down a narrow lane to the sea. Note: The sala goes straight up to the top of the house; the ceiling is conical, and the little bedrooms are built around the spring of its arch. You will notice that we make no claims to architectural grandeur, but we do have plenty of space. And here I am, surrounded only by vines and the sea for days on end. . . . Good heavens! How I wish you'd come for a week or two and taste the white wine at a penny farthing a pint. It's excellent." . . . Then, after seven days: "I have my paper and inkstand and numbers now (the box from Osnaburgh-terrace only arrived last Thursday), and can think—I’ve started doing so every morning—with a professional attitude, about the Christmas book. My paper is organized, and my pens are laid out in the usual way. I think you know the setup—Don’t you? My books haven’t cleared customs yet, and I’m worried about some volumes of Voltaire. . . . I write in the best bedroom. The sun moves off the corner window on the side of the house shortly after noon; then I can open the blinds and look up from my work at the sea, the mountains, the faded villas, the vineyards, the glaring white-hot fort with a guard on the drawbridge standing in a bit of shadow not wider than his own rifle, and the sky, as often as I wish. It's a very peaceful view, yet it's also quite uplifting. Quiet as quiet can be."
Not yet however had the time for writing come. A sharp attack of illness befell his youngest little daughter, Kate, and troubled him much. Then, after beginning the Italian grammar himself, he had to call in the help of a master; and this learning of the language took up time. But he had an aptitude for it, and after a month's application told me (24th of August) that he could ask[123] in Italian for whatever he wanted in any shop or coffee-house, and could read it pretty well. "I wish you could see me" (16th of September), "without my knowing it, walking about alone here. I am now as bold as a lion in the streets. The audacity with which one begins to speak when there is no help for it, is quite astonishing." The blank impossibility at the outset, however, of getting native meanings conveyed to his English servants, he very humorously described to me; and said the spell was first broken by the cook, "being really a clever woman, and not entrenching herself in that astonishing pride of ignorance which induces the rest to oppose themselves to the receipt of any information through any channel, and which made A. careless of looking out of window, in America, even to see the Falls of Niagara." So that he soon had to report the gain, to all of them, from the fact of this enterprising woman having so primed herself with "the names of all sorts of vegetables, meats, soups, fruits, and kitchen necessaries," that she was able to order whatever was needful of the peasantry that were trotting in and out all day, basketed and barefooted. Her example became at once contagious;[83] and before the end[124] of the second week of September news reached me that "the servants are beginning to pick up scraps of Italian; some of them go to a weekly conversazione of servants at the Governor's every Sunday night, having got over their consternation at the frequent introduction of quadrilles on these occasions; and I think they begin to like their foreigneering life."
Not yet, however, had the time for writing arrived. A sharp illness struck his youngest daughter, Kate, which troubled him greatly. After starting to learn Italian on his own, he eventually needed to get help from a teacher, and this took up time. But he had a knack for it, and after a month of effort, he told me (on August 24) that he could ask for anything he wanted in Italian at shops or cafes and could read it quite well. "I wish you could see me" (on September 16), "without my knowing it, walking around here alone. I'm now as bold as a lion in the streets. The boldness with which one starts to speak when there's no other choice is quite astonishing." He humorously described the initial frustration of trying to convey native meanings to his English servants, mentioning how the cook broke the ice. "She's a clever woman, not holding onto that ridiculous pride of ignorance that keeps the others from accepting any information, which made A. careless about looking out the window in America, even to see Niagara Falls." He soon had to report the progress made because of this enterprising woman, who had learned "the names of all sorts of vegetables, meats, soups, fruits, and kitchen necessities," allowing her to order what was needed from the villagers who came in and out all day, baskets in hand and barefoot. Her example quickly became contagious; and by the end of the second week of September, I heard that "the servants are starting to pick up bits of Italian; some of them even go to a weekly gathering for servants at the Governor's every Sunday night, having gotten over their shock at the frequent quadrilles at these events; and I think they are starting to enjoy their life abroad."
In the tradespeople they dealt with at Albaro he found amusing points of character. Sharp as they were after money, their idleness quenched even that propensity. Order for immediate delivery two or three pounds of tea, and the tea-dealer would be wretched. "Won't it do to-morrow?" "I want it now," you would reply; and he would say, "No, no, there can be no hurry!" He remonstrated against the cruelty. But everywhere there was deference, courtesy, more than civility. "In a café a little tumbler of ice costs something less than threepence, and if you give the waiter in addition what you would not offer to an English beggar, say, the third of a halfpenny, he is profoundly grateful." The attentions received from English residents were unremitting.[84] In moments of[125] need at the outset, they bestirred themselves ("large merchants and grave men") as if they were the family's salaried purveyors; and there was in especial one gentleman named Curry whose untiring kindness was long remembered.
In the tradespeople they dealt with at Albaro, he found amusing traits. As focused as they were on money, their laziness even dampened that obsession. If you ordered two or three pounds of tea for immediate delivery, the tea dealer would be miserable. "Can't it be done tomorrow?" they'd ask. "I want it now," you'd say, and they would respond, "No, no, there's no rush!" They complained about the unfairness. But everywhere, there was respect, courtesy, and more than just politeness. "In a café, a small glass of ice costs just under three pence, and if you tip the waiter what you wouldn’t even offer an English beggar—say, a third of a halfpenny—they are genuinely grateful." The attention they received from English residents was constant.[84] In times of need at the beginning, they acted as if they were the family's regular suppliers ("large merchants and serious men"), and especially memorable was one gentleman named Curry, whose endless kindness was long appreciated.
The light, eager, active figure soon made itself familiar in the streets of Genoa, and he never went into them without bringing some oddity away. I soon heard of the strada Nuova and strada Balbi; of the broadest of the two as narrower than Albany-street, and of the other as less wide than Drury-lane or Wych-street; but both filled with palaces of noble architecture and of such vast dimensions that as many windows as there are days in the year might be counted in one of them, and this not covering by any means the largest plot of ground. I heard too of the other streets, none with footways, and all varying in degrees of narrowness, but for the most part like Field-lane in Holborn, with little breathing-places like St. Martin's-court; and the widest only in parts wide enough to enable a carriage and pair to turn. "Imagine yourself looking down a street of Reform Clubs cramped after this odd fashion, the lofty roofs almost seeming to meet in the perspective." In the churches nothing[126] struck him so much as the profusion of trash and tinsel in them that contrasted with their real splendours of embellishment. One only, that of the Cappucini friars, blazed every inch of it with gold, precious stones, and paintings of priceless art; the principal contrast to its radiance being the dirt of its masters, whose bare legs, corded waists, and coarse brown serge never changed by night or day, proclaimed amid their corporate wealth their personal vows of poverty. He found them less pleasant to meet and look at than the country people of their suburb on festa-days, with the Indulgences that gave them the right to make merry stuck in their hats like turnpike-tickets. He did not think the peasant girls in general good-looking, though they carried themselves daintily and walked remarkably well: but the ugliness of the old women, begotten of hard work and a burning sun, with porters' knots of coarse grey hair grubbed up over wrinkled and cadaverous faces, he thought quite stupendous. He was never in a street a hundred yards long without getting up perfectly the witch part of Macbeth.
The lively, eager figure quickly became a familiar sight in the streets of Genoa, and he never came away without bringing back some oddity. I soon learned about the strada Nuova and strada Balbi; the wider of the two was said to be narrower than Albany Street, while the other was less wide than Drury Lane or Wych Street; but both were lined with stunning palaces of impressive architecture and such grand scale that you could count as many windows in one as there are days in a year, and this didn’t even cover the biggest piece of land. I also heard about the other streets, none of which had sidewalks, all varying in how narrow they were, but mostly resembling Field Lane in Holborn, with little spots to pause like St. Martin's Court; and the widest parts were just enough for a carriage and pair to turn around. "Picture yourself looking down a street of Reform Clubs cramped like this, with tall roofs almost seeming to touch in the distance." In the churches, nothing struck him as much as the abundance of junk and glitter that contrasted sharply with their true beauty. Only one, the church of the Cappucini friars, shone with gold, precious stones, and priceless artworks; the main contrast to its brilliance was the dirt of its friars, whose bare legs, knotted waists, and coarse brown robes never changed day or night, showcasing their personal vows of poverty amid their communal wealth. He found them less pleasant to encounter and look at than the local people in the area on feast days, with Indulgences sticking in their hats like toll tickets. He didn’t think the peasant girls were particularly attractive, although they carried themselves gracefully and walked well: but the old women’s ugliness, born from hard labor and a scorching sun, with their rough gray hair twisted up over wrinkled and gaunt faces, he found truly astonishing. He was never in a street longer than a hundred yards without thinking of the witch part of Macbeth.
With the theatres of course he soon became acquainted, and of that of the puppets he wrote to me again and again with humorous rapture. "There are other things," he added, after giving me the account which is published in his book, "too solemnly surprising to dwell upon. They must be seen. They must be seen. The enchanter carrying off the bride is not greater than his men brandishing fiery torches and dropping their lighted spirits of wine at every shake. Also the enchanter himself, when, hunted down and overcome, he leaps into the rolling sea, and finds a[127] watery grave. Also the second comic man, aged about 55 and like George the Third in the face, when he gives out the play for the next night. They must all be seen. They can't be told about. Quite impossible." The living performers he did not think so good, a disbelief in Italian actors having been always a heresy with him, and the deplorable length of dialogue to the small amount of action in their plays making them sadly tiresome. The first that he saw at the principal theatre was a version of Balzac's Père Goriot. "The domestic Lear I thought at first was going to be very clever. But he was too pitiful—perhaps the Italian reality would be. He was immensely applauded, though." He afterwards saw a version of Dumas' preposterous play of Kean, in which most of the representatives of English actors wore red hats with steeple crowns, and very loose blouses with broad belts and buckles round their waists. "There was a mysterious person called the Prince of Var-lees" (Wales), "the youngest and slimmest man in the company, whose badinage in Kean's dressing-room was irresistible; and the dresser wore top-boots, a Greek skull-cap, a black velvet jacket, and leather breeches. One or two of the actors looked very hard at me to see how I was touched by these English peculiarities—especially when Kean kissed his male friends on both cheeks." The arrangements of the house, which he described as larger than Drury-lane, he thought excellent. Instead of a ticket for the private box he had taken on the first tier, he received the usual key for admission which let him in as if he lived there; and for the whole set-out, "quite as comfortable and private as a box at our opera," paid only eight and fourpence[128] English. The opera itself had not its regular performers until after Christmas, but in the summer there was a good comic company, and he saw the Scaramuccia and the Barber of Seville brightly and pleasantly done. There was also a day theatre, beginning at half past four in the afternoon; but beyond the novelty of looking on at the covered stage as he sat in the fresh pleasant air, he did not find much amusement in the Goldoni comedy put before him. There came later a Russian circus, which the unusual rains of that summer prematurely extinguished.
He quickly got to know the theaters, and he wrote to me over and over with excited humor about the puppet theater. "There are other things," he added after sharing the account published in his book, "that are too surprisingly serious to go into. You have to see them. You have to see them. The enchanter carrying off the bride isn't more impressive than his men waving fiery torches and spilling their flaming spirits of wine with every move. Also, the enchanter himself, when he’s chased down and defeated, leaps into the rolling sea and meets a watery grave. And there’s the second comic guy, about 55, looking a bit like George the Third, when he announces the play for the next night. They all have to be seen. You can't explain them. Totally impossible." He didn’t think the live performers were as good; he’d always been skeptical of Italian actors, and the long dialogues with so little action in their plays made them painfully boring. The first show he saw at the main theater was an adaptation of Balzac's Père Goriot. "At first, I thought the domestic Lear would be very clever. But he was too sad—perhaps it was just the Italian style. He got a huge round of applause, though." Later, he saw a version of Dumas’ ridiculous play Kean, where most of the English actors wore red hats with tall crowns and very loose blouses with broad belts and buckles around their waists. "There was a mysterious figure called the Prince of Var-lees" (Wales), "the youngest and slimmest guy in the company, whose banter in Kean’s dressing room was irresistible; and the dresser wore top-boots, a Greek skull-cap, a black velvet jacket, and leather pants. A couple of the actors looked closely at me to see my reaction to these English quirks—especially when Kean kissed his male friends on both cheeks." He described the theater’s layout, which he thought was bigger than Drury Lane, as excellent. Instead of a ticket for the private box he had taken on the first tier, he received the usual key for admission that made him feel like he lived there; and for the whole experience, "just as comfortable and private as a box at our opera," he only paid eight shillings and four pence[128] English. The opera didn’t have its regular performers until after Christmas, but in the summer, there was a good comedy company, and he saw Scaramuccia and The Barber of Seville performed brightly and enjoyably. There was also a daytime theater that started at half past four in the afternoon; but beyond the novelty of watching the covered stage while sitting in the fresh air, he didn’t find much enjoyment in the Goldoni comedy presented to him. Later on, a Russian circus came, but the unusual rains that summer ended it prematurely.
The Religious Houses he made early and many enquiries about, and there was one that had stirred and baffled his curiosity much before he discovered what it really was. All that was visible from the street was a great high wall, apparently quite alone, no thicker than a party wall, with grated windows, to which iron screens gave farther protection. At first he supposed there had been a fire; but by degrees came to know that on the other side were galleries, one above another, one above another, and nuns always pacing them to and fro. Like the wall of a racket-ground outside, it was inside a very large nunnery; and let the poor sisters walk never so much, neither they nor the passers-by could see anything of each other. It was close upon the Acqua Sola, too; a little park with still young but very pretty trees, and fresh and cheerful fountains, which the Genoese made their Sunday promenade; and underneath which was an archway with great public tanks, where, at all ordinary times, washerwomen were washing away, thirty or forty together. At Albaro they were worse off in this matter: the clothes there being[129] washed in a pond, beaten with gourds, and whitened with a preparation of lime: "so that," he wrote to me (24th of August), "what between the beating and the burning they fall into holes unexpectedly, and my white trowsers, after six weeks' washing, would make very good fishing-nets. It is such a serious damage that when we get into the Peschiere we mean to wash at home."
He soon started asking a lot of questions about the religious houses, particularly one that had piqued his curiosity long before he figured out what it really was. All he could see from the street was a tall, solitary wall, no thicker than a standard partition, with barred windows, which were further secured by iron screens. Initially, he thought there had been a fire, but gradually he learned that on the other side were multiple galleries, one above the other, with nuns constantly walking back and forth. It was like the wall of a racquetball court, but inside was a large nunnery; no matter how much the poor sisters walked, neither they nor the people passing by could see each other. It was also close to the Acqua Sola, a small park with young but beautiful trees and fresh, cheerful fountains where the Genoese spent their Sundays. Beneath it was an archway with large public basins where washerwomen gathered, around thirty or forty at a time. In Albaro, it was worse; the clothes were washed in a pond, beaten with gourds, and whitened with lime: "so that," he wrote to me (August 24th), "with all the beating and the heat, they end up in unexpected holes, and my white trousers, after six weeks of washing, would make excellent fishing nets. It's such a serious problem that when we get to the Peschiere, we plan to wash at home."
Exactly a fortnight before this date, he had hired rooms in the Peschiere from the first of the following October; and so ended the house-hunting for his winter residence, that had taken him so often to the city. The Peschiere was the largest palace in Genoa let on hire, and had the advantage of standing on a height aloof from the town, surrounded by its own gardens. The rooms taken had been occupied by an English colonel, the remainder of whose term was let to Dickens for 500 francs a month (£20); and a few days after (20th of August) he described to me a fellow tenant: "A Spanish duke has taken the room under me in the Peschiere. The duchess was his mistress many years, and bore him (I think) six daughters. He always promised her that if she gave birth to a son, he would marry her; and when at last the boy arrived, he went into her bedroom, saying—'Duchess, I am charmed to "salute you!"' And he married her in good earnest, and legitimatized (as by the Spanish law he could) all the other children." The beauty of the new abode will justify a little description when he takes up his quarters there. One or two incidents may be related, meanwhile, of the closing weeks of his residence at Albaro.[130]
Exactly two weeks before this date, he had rented rooms in the Peschiere starting from the first of the following October; thus, his search for a winter residence, which had taken him frequently to the city, came to an end. The Peschiere was the largest palace in Genoa available for rent and had the advantage of being situated on a hill, away from the town, surrounded by its own gardens. The rooms he rented had previously been occupied by an English colonel, and the remainder of his lease was rented to Dickens for 500 francs a month (£20); a few days later (on August 20th), he described a fellow tenant to me: "A Spanish duke has rented the room below me in the Peschiere. The duchess was his mistress for many years and bore him (I think) six daughters. He always promised her that if she had a son, he would marry her; and when the boy finally arrived, he went into her bedroom, saying—'Duchess, I’m delighted to 'greet you!' And he married her for real, legitimizing (as he could under Spanish law) all the other children." The beauty of the new place will warrant a little description when he settles in there. Meanwhile, I can share a couple of incidents from the last weeks of his stay at Albaro.[130]
In the middle of August he dined with the French consul-general, and there will now be no impropriety in printing his agreeable sketch of the dinner. "There was present, among other Genoese, the Marquis di Negri: a very fat and much older Jerdan, with the same thickness of speech and size of tongue. He was Byron's friend, keeps open house here, writes poetry, improvises, and is a very good old Blunderbore; just the sort of instrument to make an artesian well with, anywhere. Well, sir, after dinner, the consul proposed my health, with a little French conceit to the effect that I had come to Italy to have personal experience of its lovely climate, and that there was this similarity between the Italian sun and its visitor, that the sun shone into the darkest places and made them bright and happy with its benignant influence, and that my books had done the like with the breasts of men, and so forth. Upon which Blunderbore gives his bright-buttoned blue coat a great rap on the breast, turns up his fishy eye, stretches out his arm like the living statue defying the lightning at Astley's, and delivers four impromptu verses in my honour, at which everybody is enchanted, and I more than anybody—perhaps with the best reason, for I didn't understand a word of them. The consul then takes from his breast a roll of paper, and says, 'I shall read them!' Blunderbore then says, 'Don't!' But the consul does, and Blunderbore beats time to the music of the verse with his knuckles on the table; and perpetually ducks forward to look round the cap of a lady sitting between himself and me, to see what I think of them. I exhibit lively emotion. The verses are in French—short line—on the taking[131] of Tangiers by the Prince de Joinville; and are received with great applause; especially by a nobleman present who is reported to be unable to read and write. They end in my mind (rapidly translating them into prose) thus,—
In mid-August, he had dinner with the French consul-general, and now there’s no reason not to share his amusing take on the evening. “Among the other Genoese guests was the Marquis di Negri: a very plump and much older version of Jerdan, with the same heavy way of speaking and a thick tongue. He was a friend of Byron, hosts gatherings here, writes poetry, improvises, and is quite the bumbling old fellow; just the kind of person you could drill a well with, anywhere. After dinner, the consul toasted my health, adding a little French flair by saying I’d come to Italy to experience its beautiful climate, and that just like the Italian sun, I had the ability to shine into the darkest places, bringing brightness and joy with my warm influence, and that my books had done the same for people’s hearts, and so on. At this point, Blunderbore gave his nicely-buttoned blue coat a good thump on the chest, rolled his fishy eye, extended his arm like a living statue defying lightning at Astley’s, and delivered four spontaneous verses in my honor, which delighted everyone, and I was especially pleased—perhaps for good reason, since I didn’t catch a word of it. The consul then pulled out a piece of paper and said, ‘I’ll read them!’ Blunderbore quickly interjected, ‘Don’t!’ But the consul proceeded, while Blunderbore kept the beat on the table with his knuckles, constantly leaning forward to peek around a lady sitting between us to see my reaction. I feigned enthusiastic appreciation. The verses were in French—short lines—about the capture of Tangiers by Prince de Joinville; they received a warm reception, particularly from a nobleman present who was said to be illiterate. I quickly translated it into prose in my mind, and it ended like this—
'The cannon of France Rendering thanks
Shake the foundation To Heaven.
Of the wondering sea, The King
The artillery on the shore And all the Royal Family
Is put to silence. Are bathed
Honour to Joinville In tears.
And the Brave! They call upon the name
The Great Intelligence Of Joinville!
Is borne France also
Upon the wings of Fame Weeps, and echoes it.
To Paris. Joinville is crowned
Her national citizens With Immortality;
Exchange caresses And Peace and Joinville,
In the streets! And the Glory of France,
The temples are crowded Diffuse themselves
With religious patriots Conjointly.'
If you can figure to yourself the choice absurdity of receiving anything into one's mind in this way, you can imagine the labour I underwent in my attempts to keep the lower part of my face square, and to lift up one eye gently, as with admiring attention. But I am bound to add that this is really pretty literal; for I read them afterwards."
If you can picture how ridiculous it is to take anything into your mind like that, you can imagine the effort I put into trying to keep my jaw straight and lift one eyebrow gently, as if I was paying close attention. But I have to admit that this is actually quite literal; I read them later on.
This, too, was the year of other uncomfortable glories of France in the last three years of her Orleans dynasty; among them the Tahiti business, as politicians may remember; and so hot became rumours of war with England at the opening of September that Dickens had serious thoughts of at once striking his tent. One[132] of his letters was filled with the conflicting doubts in which they lived for nigh a fortnight, every day's arrival contradicting the arrival of the day before: so that, as he told me, you met a man in the street to-day, who told you there would certainly be war in a week; and you met the same man in the street to-morrow, and he swore he always knew there would be nothing but peace; and you met him again the day after, and he said it all depended now on something perfectly new and unheard of before, which somebody else said had just come to the knowledge of some consul in some dispatch which said something about some telegraph which had been at work somewhere, signalizing some prodigious intelligence. However, it all passed harmlessly away, leaving him undisturbed opportunity to avail himself of a pleasure that arose out of the consul-general's dinner party, and to be present at a great reception given shortly after by the good "old Blunderbore" just mentioned, on the occasion of his daughter's birthday.
This was also the year of other uncomfortable achievements of France during the last three years of her Orleans dynasty; among them, the Tahiti incident, as politicians may remember; and rumors of war with England became so intense at the start of September that Dickens seriously considered packing up and leaving. One[132] of his letters detailed the conflicting uncertainties they faced for nearly two weeks, with each day's news contradicting what had been reported the day before: so that, as he told me, you would meet a man in the street today who insisted there would definitely be war within a week; then you would bump into the same guy tomorrow, and he would swear he always knew there would be nothing but peace; and you would encounter him again the following day, and he would claim it all depended now on something completely new and unheard of before, which someone said had just come to the attention of some consul in some dispatch that mentioned some telegraph that had been operating somewhere, signaling some major news. However, it all faded away harmlessly, leaving him free to enjoy a pleasure that came from the consul-general's dinner party and to attend a grand reception held shortly after by the good "old Blunderbore," as mentioned, for his daughter's birthday.
The Marquis had a splendid house, but Dickens found the grounds so carved into grottoes and fanciful walks as to remind him of nothing so much as our old White-conduit-house, except that he would have been well pleased, on the present occasion, to have discovered a waiter crying, "Give your orders, gents!" it being not easy to him at any time to keep up, the whole night through, on ices and variegated lamps merely. But the scene for awhile was amusing enough, and not rendered less so by the delight of the Marquis himself, "who was constantly diving out into dark corners and then among the lattice-work and flower pots,[133] rubbing his hands and going round and round with explosive chuckles in his huge satisfaction with the entertainment." With horror it occurred to Dickens, however, that four more hours of this kind of entertainment would be too much; that the Genoa gates closed at twelve; and that as the carriage had not been ordered till the dancing was expected to be over and the gates to reopen, he must make a sudden bolt if he would himself get back to Albaro. "I had barely time," he told me, "to reach the gate before midnight; and was running as hard as I could go, down-hill, over uneven ground, along a new street called the strada Sevra, when I came to a pole fastened straight across the street, nearly breast high, without any light or watchman—quite in the Italian style. I went over it, headlong, with such force that I rolled myself completely white in the dust; but although I tore my clothes to shreds, I hardly scratched myself except in one place on the knee. I had no time to think of it then, for I was up directly and off again to save the gate: but when I got outside the wall, and saw the state I was in, I wondered I had not broken my neck. I 'took it easy' after this, and walked home, by lonely ways enough, without meeting a single soul. But there is nothing to be feared, I believe, from midnight walks in this part of Italy. In other places you incur the danger of being stabbed by mistake; whereas the people here are quiet and good tempered, and very rarely commit any outrage."
The Marquis had an impressive house, but Dickens found the grounds so intricately shaped with grottos and whimsical pathways that it reminded him of the old White-conduit-house, except that he would have really welcomed a waiter shouting, "Place your orders, gentlemen!" It was never easy for him to get through an entire night on just ice desserts and colorful lights. However, the scene was entertaining enough for a while, especially with the Marquis himself, who kept popping out into dark corners and weaving through the latticework and flower pots, rubbing his hands and circling around with loud chuckles, clearly thrilled with the entertainment. Dickens suddenly realized, with a growing dread, that four more hours of this kind of fun would be too much; the Genoa gates closed at midnight; and since the carriage was ordered just after the dancing was supposed to wrap up and the gates reopen, he needed to make a quick exit to get back to Albaro. "I barely had time," he told me, "to reach the gate before midnight; I was running as fast as I could down a hill, over uneven ground, and along a new street called Strada Sevra, when I slammed into a pole set across the street at about chest height, with no light or watchman—totally Italian. I went over it headfirst, hitting the ground so hard that I ended up completely covered in dust; but though I ripped my clothes to shreds, I hardly grazed myself except for one spot on my knee. I didn't have time to think about it then, because I got right back up and continued on to make it to the gate; but when I got outside the wall and saw the state I was in, I couldn't believe I hadn’t broken my neck. After that, I took it easy and walked home through quiet paths, without running into a single soul. But I believe there's nothing to fear from late-night strolls in this part of Italy. In other places, you risk being accidentally stabbed; whereas here, the people are calm and good-natured, and very rarely commit any violence."
Such adventures, nevertheless, are seldom without consequences, and there followed in this case a short but sharp attack of illness. It came on with the old[134] "unspeakable and agonizing pain in the side," for which Bob Fagin had prepared and applied the hot bottles in the old warehouse time; and it yielded quickly to powerful remedies. But for a few days he had to content himself with the minor sights of Albaro. He sat daily in the shade of the ruined chapel on the seashore. He looked in at the festa in the small country church, consisting mainly of a tenor singer, a seraphine, and four priests sitting gaping in a row on one side of the altar "in flowered satin dresses and little cloth caps, looking exactly like the band at a wild-beast-caravan." He was interested in the wine-making, and in seeing the country tenants preparing their annual presents for their landlords, of baskets of grapes and other fruit prettily dressed with flowers. The season of the grapes, too, brought out after dusk strong parties of rats to eat them as they ripened, and so many shooting parties of peasants to get rid of these despoilers, that as he first listened to the uproar of the firing and the echoes he half fancied it a siege of Albaro. The flies mustered strong, too, and the mosquitos;[85] so that at night he had to lie covered up with gauze, like cold meat in a safe.
Such adventures, however, rarely come without consequences, and in this case, there was a brief but intense bout of illness. It started with the familiar "unbearable and excruciating pain in the side," for which Bob Fagin had prepared and used hot water bottles back in the old warehouse days; and it quickly responded to strong medications. But for a few days, he had to make do with the minor attractions of Albaro. He spent each day in the shade of the old chapel by the sea. He checked out the festival in the small country church, which mainly featured a tenor singer, a seraphine, and four priests sitting in a row on one side of the altar, "in floral satin robes and little cloth caps, looking just like the band at a wild animal circus." He was intrigued by the wine-making and watched as the local tenants prepared their annual gifts for their landlords, which included baskets of grapes and other fruit beautifully adorned with flowers. The grape harvest season also attracted large groups of rats at night to feast on the ripening fruit, prompting many shooting parties of peasants to eliminate these pests, so that when he first heard the noise of gunfire and the echoes, he almost imagined it was a siege of Albaro. The flies came out in force, too, along with the mosquitoes; so at night, he had to lie covered in gauze, like cold meat in a safe.
Of course all news from England, and especially visits paid him by English friends who might be travelling in Italy, were a great delight. This was the year when O'Connell was released from prison by the judgment of the Lords on appeal. "I have no faith in O'Connell taking the great position he might upon this: being beleaguered by vanity always. Denman delights me. I am glad to think I have always liked him so well. I am sure that whenever he makes a mistake, it is a mistake; and that no man lives who has a grander and nobler scorn of every mean and dastard action. I would to Heaven it were decorous to pay him some public tribute of respect . . . O'Connell's speeches are the old thing: fretty, boastful, frothy, waspish at the voices in the crowd, and all that: but with no true greatness. . . . What a relief to turn to that noble letter of Carlyle's" (in which a timely testimony had been borne to the truthfulness and honour of Mazzini), "which I think above all praise. My love to him." Among his English visitors were Mr. Tagart's family, on their way from a scientific congress at Milan; and Peter (now become Lord) Robertson from Rome, of whose talk he wrote very pleasantly. The sons of Burns had been entertained during the summer in Edinburgh at what was called a Burns Festival, of which, through Jerrold who was present, I had sent him no very favourable account; and this was now confirmed by Robertson, whose letters had given him an "awful" narrative of Wilson's speech, and of the whole business. "There was one man who spoke a quarter of an hour or so, to the toast of the navy; and could say nothing more than 'the—British—navy—always appreciates—' which[136] remarkable sentiment he repeated over and over again for that space of time; and then sat down. Robertson told me also that Wilson's allusion to, or I should rather say expatiation upon, the 'vices' of Burns, excited but one sentiment of indignation and disgust: and added, very sensibly, 'By God!—I want to know what Burns did! I never heard of his doing anything that need be strange or unaccountable to the Professor's mind. I think he must have mistaken the name, and fancied it a dinner to the sons of Burke'—meaning of course the murderer. In short he fully confirmed Jerrold in all respects." The same letter told me, too, something of his reading. Jerrold's Story of a Feather he had derived much enjoyment from. "Gauntwolf's sickness and the career of that snuffbox, masterly.[86] I have been deep in Voyages and Travels, and in De Foe. Tennyson I have also been reading, again and again. What a great creature he is! . . . What about the Goldsmith? Apropos, I am all eagerness to write a story about the length of that most delightful of all stories, the Vicar of Wakefield."
Of course, all news from England, especially visits from English friends traveling in Italy, brought him great joy. This was the year O'Connell was released from prison by the judgment of the Lords on appeal. "I have no faith in O'Connell taking the significant role he could play because he's always caught up in vanity. Denman delights me. I'm glad to think I have always liked him so much. I'm sure that whenever he makes a mistake, it *is* a mistake; and no one else has a greater and nobler disdain for every mean and cowardly action. I wish it were appropriate to pay him some public tribute of respect… O'Connell's speeches are just the same: fidgety, boastful, superficial, snapping at the voices in the crowd, and all that, but lacking any true greatness… What a relief to turn to that noble letter of Carlyle's" (in which a timely testimony was given to the truthfulness and honor of Mazzini), "which I think is beyond all praise. My love to him." Among his English visitors were Mr. Tagart's family, on their way from a scientific congress in Milan; and Peter (now Lord) Robertson from Rome, whose conversation he wrote about pleasantly. The sons of Burns had been entertained during the summer in Edinburgh at what was called a Burns Festival, of which I had sent him no very favorable account through Jerrold, who was present, and this was now confirmed by Robertson, whose letters had given him an "awful" narrative of Wilson's speech and the whole affair. "There was one man who spoke for about a quarter of an hour, toasting the navy; and all he could say was 'the—British—navy—always appreciates—,' which[136] he repeated over and over again for that entire time; and then he sat down. Robertson also told me that Wilson's reference to, or I should say lengthy discussion about, the 'vices' of Burns, provoked nothing but disgust and outrage: and added, very sensibly, 'By God!—I want to know *what Burns did!* I never heard of him doing anything that should seem strange or unaccountable to the Professor's mind. I think he must have mistaken the name and thought it was a dinner for the sons of *Burke*'—meaning, of course, the murderer. In short, he fully confirmed Jerrold in every respect." The same letter also mentioned something about his reading. He had greatly enjoyed Jerrold's *Story of a Feather*. "Gauntwolf's illness and the story of that snuffbox—masterful. I have been deeply into Voyages and Travels, and into Defoe. I've also been reading Tennyson, again and again. What a great talent he is!… What about the *Goldsmith?* By the way, I'm very eager to write a story about the length of that most delightful of all stories, the *Vicar of Wakefield*."
In the second week of September he went to meet his brother Frederick at Marseilles, and bring him back over the Cornice road to pass a fortnight's holiday at Genoa; and his description of the first inn upon the Alps they slept in is too good to be lost. "We lay last night," he wrote (9th of September) "at the[137] first halting-place on this journey, in an inn which is not entitled, as it ought to be, The house of call for fleas and vermin in general, but is entitled the grand hotel of the Post! I hardly know what to compare it to. It seemed something like a house in Somers-town originally built for a wine-vaults and never finished, but grown very old. There was nothing to eat in it and nothing to drink. They had lost the teapot; and when they found it, they couldn't make out what had become of the lid, which, turning up at last and being fixed on to the teapot, couldn't be got off again for the pouring in of more water. Fleas of elephantine dimensions were gambolling boldly in the dirty beds; and the mosquitoes!—But let me here draw a curtain (as I would have done if there had been any). We had scarcely any sleep, and rose up with hands and arms hardly human."
In the second week of September, he went to meet his brother Frederick in Marseilles and bring him back along the Cornice road to spend a two-week holiday in Genoa. His description of the first inn in the Alps where they stayed is too good to forget. "We stayed last night," he wrote (9th of September), "at the[137] first stop on this journey, in an inn that really should be called The House of Call for Fleas and Vermin in General, but is instead named the Grand Hotel of the Post! I can hardly find anything to compare it to. It looked somewhat like a house in Somers-town, originally built for a wine vault and never finished, but now very old. There was nothing to eat or drink. They had lost the teapot, and when they finally found it, they couldn’t figure out what happened to the lid, which, when it eventually showed up and was put back on the teapot, couldn’t be removed again to pour in more water. Fleas of gigantic size were boldly jumping around in the filthy beds; and the mosquitoes!—But let me draw a curtain here (if only there had been one). We barely slept and woke up with hands and arms barely human."
In four days they were at Albaro, and the morning after their arrival Dickens underwent the terrible shock of seeing his brother very nearly drowned in the bay. He swam out into too strong a current,[87] and was only narrowly saved by the accident of a fishing-boat preparing to leave the harbour at the time. "It was a world of horror and anguish," Dickens wrote to me, "crowded into four or five minutes of dreadful agitation; and, to complete the terror of it, Georgy, Charlotte" (the nurse), "and the children were on a[138] rock in full view of it all, crying, as you may suppose, like mad creatures." His own bathing was from the rock, and, as he had already told me, of the most primitive kind. He went in whenever he pleased, broke his head against sharp stones if he went in with that end foremost, floundered about till he was all over bruises, and then climbed and staggered out again. "Everybody wears a dress. Mine extremely theatrical: Masaniello to the life: shall be preserved for your inspection in Devonshire-terrace." I will add another personal touch, also Masaniello-like, which marks the beginning of a change which, though confined for the present to his foreign residence and removed when he came to England, was resumed somewhat later, and in a few more years wholly altered the aspect of his face. "The moustaches are glorious, glorious. I have cut them shorter, and trimmed them a little at the ends to improve the shape. They are charming, charming. Without them, life would be a blank."
In four days, they arrived at Albaro, and the morning after they got there, Dickens experienced the shocking moment of seeing his brother nearly drown in the bay. He swam out into a strong current and was only narrowly saved by a fishing boat that happened to be leaving the harbor at that moment. "It was a world of horror and anguish," Dickens wrote to me, "crammed into four or five minutes of terrifying chaos; and, to add to the fear, Georgy, Charlotte" (the nurse), "and the children were on a rock right in view of it all, crying, as you can imagine, like crazy people." His own swimming was from the rock, and, as he had already mentioned to me, it was quite basic. He went in whenever he wanted, bumped his head on sharp stones if he dove in headfirst, flailed around until he was bruised all over, and then climbed back out, staggering. "Everyone wears a dress. Mine is extremely theatrical: totally Masaniello: will be saved for you to see in Devonshire-terrace." I'll add another personal detail, also Masaniello-like, which marks the start of a change that, while currently restricted to his time abroad and disappearing when he returned to England, would later be picked back up and eventually transform his appearance completely. "The mustaches are glorious, glorious. I've cut them shorter and trimmed them a bit at the ends to improve the shape. They are charming, charming. Without them, life would be empty."
CHAPTER VI.
WORK IN GENOA: PALAZZO PESCHIERE.
1844.
In the last week of September they moved from Albaro into Genoa, amid a violent storm of wind and wet, "great guns blowing," the lightning incessant, and the rain driving down in a dense thick cloud. But the worst of the storm was over when they reached the Peschiere. As they passed into it along the stately old terraces, flanked on either side with antique sculptured figures, all the seven fountains were playing in its gardens, and the sun was shining brightly on its groves of camellias and orange-trees.
In the last week of September, they moved from Albaro to Genoa during a fierce storm with strong winds and heavy rain, "great guns blowing," lightning striking continuously, and rain pouring down like a thick curtain. But the worst of the storm had passed when they arrived at the Peschiere. As they entered along the grand old terraces, lined with ancient sculpted figures on both sides, all seven fountains were flowing in its gardens, and the sun was shining brightly on its groves of camellias and orange trees.
It was a wonderful place, and I soon became familiar with the several rooms that were to form their home for the rest of their stay in Italy. In the centre was the grand sala, fifty feet high, of an area larger than "the dining-room of the Academy," and painted, walls and ceiling, with frescoes three hundred years old, "as fresh as if the colours had been laid on yesterday."[140] On the same floor as this great hall were a drawing-room, and a dining-room,[88] both covered also with frescoes still bright enough to make them thoroughly cheerful, and both so nicely proportioned as to give to their bigness all the effect of snugness.[89] Out of these opened three other chambers that were turned into sleeping-rooms and nurseries. Adjoining the sala, right and left, were the two best bedrooms; "in size and shape like those at Windsor-castle but greatly higher;" both having altars, a range of three windows with stone balconies, floors tesselated in patterns of black and white stone, and walls painted every inch: on the left, nymphs pursued by satyrs "as large as life and as wicked;" on the right, "Phaeton larger than life, with horses bigger than Meux and Co.'s, tumbling headlong down into the best bed." The right-hand one he occupied with his wife, and of the left took possession as a study; writing behind a big screen he had lugged into it, and placed by one of the[141] windows, from which he could see over the city, as he wrote, as far as the lighthouse in its harbour. Distant little over a mile as the crow flew, flashing five times in four minutes, and on dark nights, as if by magic, illuminating brightly the whole palace-front every time it shone, this lighthouse was one of the wonders of Genoa.
It was an amazing place, and I quickly got to know the various rooms that would be their home for the rest of their time in Italy. In the center was the grand hall, fifty feet high, larger than "the dining-room of the Academy," with walls and ceiling covered in frescoes that were three hundred years old, "as fresh as if the colors had been applied yesterday."[140] On the same floor as this grand hall were a drawing room and a dining room,[88] both also adorned with frescoes that were still vibrant enough to create a cheerful atmosphere, and both were so well-proportioned that their size felt cozy.[89] Off these rooms were three other chambers converted into bedrooms and nurseries. Next to the hall, on both sides, were the two best bedrooms; "similar in size and shape to those at Windsor Castle but much taller;" each with altars, a series of three windows with stone balconies, floors patterned with black and white tiles, and walls painted from top to bottom: on the left, nymphs chased by satyrs "as large as life and as wicked;" on the right, "Phaeton larger than life, with horses bigger than those from Meux and Co.," tumbling headlong into the best bed. He occupied the right bedroom with his wife, while he claimed the left one as a study; he wrote behind a large screen he had brought in and set up by one of the[141] windows, from where he could see over the city, all the way to the lighthouse in the harbor. A little over a mile away as the crow flies, flashing five times in four minutes, and on dark nights, as if by magic, brightly illuminating the whole palace front every time it shone, this lighthouse was one of the wonders of Genoa.

When it had all become more familiar to him, he was fond of dilating on its beauties; and even the dreary sound of the chaunting from neighbouring mass-performances, as it floated in at all the open windows, which at first was a sad trouble, came to[142] have its charm for him. I remember a vivid account he gave me of a great festa on the hill behind the house, when the people alternately danced under tents in the open air and rushed to say a prayer or two in an adjoining church bright with red and gold and blue and silver; so many minutes of dancing, and of praying, in regular turns of each. But the view over into Genoa, on clear bright days, was a never failing enjoyment. The whole city then, without an atom of smoke, and with every possible variety of tower and steeple pointing up into the sky, lay stretched out below his windows. To the right and left were lofty hills, with every indentation in their rugged sides sharply discernible; and on one side of the harbour stretched away into the dim bright distance the whole of the Cornice, its first highest range of mountains hoary with snow. Sitting down one Spring day to write to me, he thus spoke of the sea and of the garden. "Beyond the town is the wide expanse of the Mediterranean, as blue, at this moment, as the most pure and vivid prussian blue on Mac's palette when it is newly set; and on the horizon there is a red flush, seen nowhere as it is here. Immediately below the windows are the gardens of the house, with gold fish swimming and diving in the fountains; and below them, at the foot of a steep slope, the public garden and drive, where the walks are marked out by hedges of pink roses, which blush and shine through the green trees and vines, close up to the balconies of these windows. No custom can impair, and no description enhance, the beauty of the scene."
When everything became more familiar to him, he liked to talk about its beauty; even the dreary sound of chanting from nearby mass gatherings, drifting in through the open windows, which at first felt like a sad nuisance, eventually grew to have its own charm for him. I remember a vivid story he shared about a big festival on the hill behind the house, where people alternated between dancing under tents in the open air and rushing to say a prayer or two in a nearby church decorated in bright red, gold, blue, and silver; a set amount of dancing and prayer, each in regular turns. But the view over Genoa on clear, sunny days was an endless source of joy. The whole city lay stretched out below his windows, with no smoke in sight, and every kind of tower and steeple pointing up into the sky. To the right and left were tall hills, with every indentation in their rugged sides clearly visible; on one side of the harbor, the entire Cornice stretched into the distant brightness, the highest peaks capped with snow. One Spring day, as he sat down to write to me, he described the sea and the garden: "Beyond the town is the vast expanse of the Mediterranean, as blue right now as the pure, vivid Prussian blue on Mac's palette when it's freshly set; and on the horizon, there’s a red glow, unlike anywhere else. Directly below the windows are the gardens of the house, with goldfish swimming and diving in the fountains; and beneath them, at the bottom of a steep slope, the public garden and drive, where pathways are lined with pink rose hedges that blush and shine through the green trees and vines, right up to the balconies of these windows. No habit can lessen, and no description can enhance, the beauty of this scene."
All these and other glories and beauties, however,[143] did not come to him at once. They counted for little indeed when he first set himself seriously to write. "Never did I stagger so upon a threshold before. I seem as if I had plucked myself out of my proper soil when I left Devonshire-terrace; and could take root no more until I return to it. . . . Did I tell you how many fountains we have here? No matter. If they played nectar, they wouldn't please me half so well as the West Middlesex water-works at Devonshire-terrace." The subject for his new Christmas story he had chosen, but he had not found a title for it, or the machinery to work it with; when, at the moment of what seemed to be his greatest trouble, both reliefs came. Sitting down one morning resolute for work, though against the grain, his hand being out and everything inviting to idleness, such a peal of chimes arose from the city as he found to be "maddening." All Genoa lay beneath him, and up from it, with some sudden set of the wind, came in one fell sound the clang and clash of all its steeples, pouring into his ears, again and again, in a tuneless, grating, discordant, jerking, hideous vibration that made his ideas "spin round and round till they lost themselves in a whirl of vexation and giddiness, and dropped down dead." He had never before so suffered, nor did he again; but this was his description to me next day, and his excuse for having failed in a promise to send me his title. Only two days later, however, came a letter in which not a syllable was written but "We have heard the Chimes at midnight, Master Shallow!" and I knew he had discovered what he wanted.
All these glories and beauties, however, [143] didn't come to him all at once. They didn't mean much when he first started to write seriously. "I've never struggled on a threshold like this before. It feels like I've uprooted myself from my home when I left Devonshire-terrace; I can't settle down again until I go back. . . . Did I mention how many fountains we have here? It doesn't matter. Even if they flowed with nectar, they wouldn't be half as satisfying as the West Middlesex water-works at Devonshire-terrace." He had chosen the subject for his new Christmas story, but he still hadn't come up with a title or the structure to work with; then, at what seemed to be his most difficult moment, both came to him. One morning, determined to work despite feeling resistance, with distractions all around him, he was overwhelmed by a loud peal of chimes from the city that he found "maddening." All of Genoa lay below him, and suddenly, with a gust of wind, he was hit by the clang and clash of all its steeples, filling his ears with a constant, grating, discordant noise that made his thoughts "spin round and round until they lost themselves in a whirl of frustration and dizziness, and just plummeted." He had never experienced such suffering before, nor would he again; but this was how he described it to me the next day, and it was his excuse for not sending me his title. Just two days later, though, he sent a letter with only the words, "We have heard the Chimes at midnight, Master Shallow!" and I knew he had found what he was looking for.
Other difficulties were still to be got over. He craved[144] for the London streets. He so missed his long night-walks before beginning anything that he seemed, as he said, dumbfounded without them. "I can't help thinking of the boy in the school-class whose button was cut off by Walter Scott and his friends. Put me down on Waterloo-bridge at eight o'clock in the evening, with leave to roam about as long as I like, and I would come home, as you know, panting to go on. I am sadly strange as it is, and can't settle. You will have lots of hasty notes from me while I am at work; but you know your man; and whatever strikes me, I shall let off upon you as if I were in Devonshire-terrace. It's a great thing to have my title, and see my way how to work the bells. Let them clash upon me now from all the churches and convents in Genoa, I see nothing but the old London belfry I have set them in. In my mind's eye, Horatio. I like more and more my notion of making, in this little book, a great blow for the poor. Something powerful, I think I can do, but I want to be tender too, and cheerful; as like the Carol in that respect as may be, and as unlike it as such a thing can be. The duration of the action will resemble it a little, but I trust to the novelty of the machinery to carry that off; and if my design be anything at all, it has a grip upon the very throat of the time." (8th of October.)
Other challenges were still ahead. He longed[144] for the streets of London. He missed his long nighttime walks so much before starting anything that he felt, as he put it, lost without them. "I can't stop thinking about the boy in class whose button was cut off by Walter Scott and his friends. Just drop me off on Waterloo Bridge at eight o'clock in the evening, and let me wander as long as I want, and I would come home, as you know, eager to keep going. I'm feeling a bit out of sorts and can't focus. You'll get plenty of quick notes from me while I'm working; but you know how I am; whatever comes to mind, I'll share with you as if I were still at Devonshire Terrace. It's fantastic to have my title and see how I can work the bells. Let them ring out to me now from all the churches and convents in Genoa; all I can see is the old London belfry I placed them in. In my mind's eye, Horatio. I increasingly like the idea of making, in this little book, a strong statement for the poor. I believe I can do something impactful, but I also want it to be kind and uplifting; as similar to the Carol in that way as possible, and as different from it as can be. The length of the story will be a bit like it, but I trust that the novelty of the storytelling will make it work; and if my idea means anything at all, it has a grip on the very heart of the time." (8th of October.)
Thus bent upon his work, for which he never had been in more earnest mood, he was disturbed by hearing that he must attend the levee of the Governor who had unexpectedly arrived in the city, and who would take it as an affront, his eccentric friend Fletcher told him, if that courtesy were not immediately paid. "It[145] was the morning on which I was going to begin, so I wrote round to our consul,"—praying, of course, that excuse should be made for him. Don't bother yourself, replied that sensible functionary, for all the consuls and governors alive; but shut yourself up by all means. "So," continues Dickens, telling me the tale, "he went next morning in great state and full costume, to present two English gentlemen. 'Where's the great poet?' said the Governor. 'I want to see the great poet.' 'The great poet, your excellency,' said the consul, 'is at work, writing a book, and begged me to make his excuses.' 'Excuses!' said the Governor, 'I wouldn't interfere with such an occupation for all the world. Pray tell him that my house is open to the honour of his presence when it is perfectly convenient for him; but not otherwise. And let no gentleman,' said the Governor, a surweyin' of his suite with a majestic eye, 'call upon Signor Dickens till he is understood to be disengaged.' And he sent somebody with his own cards next day. Now I do seriously call this, real politeness and pleasant consideration—not positively American, but still gentlemanly and polished. The same spirit pervades the inferior departments; and I have not been required to observe the usual police regulations, or to put myself to the slightest trouble about anything." (18th of October.)
So focused on his work, more seriously than ever before, he was interrupted by news that he had to attend the Governor's levee, who had suddenly arrived in the city. His quirky friend Fletcher warned him that it would be seen as an insult if he didn’t pay that respect immediately. "It[145] was the morning I planned to start, so I wrote to our consul,”—hoping that he would find an excuse for him. “Don’t worry about it,” replied the sensible official, “you can ignore all the consuls and governors out there; but lock yourself away if you want.” “So,” Dickens continues, recounting the story, “he went the next morning in full state and outfit to introduce two English gentlemen. ‘Where’s the great poet?’ asked the Governor. ‘I want to see the great poet.’ ‘The great poet, your excellency,’ said the consul, ‘is busy writing a book and asked me to make his apologies.’ ‘Apologies!’ said the Governor, ‘I wouldn’t disturb such important work for anything. Please let him know that my home is open to him whenever it’s perfectly convenient for him; not before. And let no gentleman,’ the Governor added, surveying his entourage with a commanding gaze, ‘visit Mr. Dickens until he is known to be free.’ He even sent someone with his own cards the next day. I seriously consider this real politeness and thoughtful consideration—not exactly American, but still courteous and refined. The same spirit is evident in the lower ranks; I haven't had to follow the usual police regulations or deal with any trouble about anything.” (18th of October.)
The picture I am now to give of him at work should be prefaced by a word or two that may throw light on the design he was working at. It was a large theme for so small an instrument; and the disproportion was not more characteristic of the man, than the throes of suffering and passion to be presently undergone by him[146] for results that many men would smile at. He was bent, as he says, on striking a blow for the poor. They had always been his clients, they had never been forgotten in any of his books, but here nothing else was to be remembered. He had become, in short, terribly earnest in the matter. Several months before he left England, I had noticed in him the habit of more gravely regarding many things before passed lightly enough; the hopelessness of any true solution of either political or social problems by the ordinary Downing-street methods had been startlingly impressed on him in Carlyle's writings; and in the parliamentary talk of that day he had come to have as little faith for the putting down of any serious evil, as in a then notorious city Alderman's gabble for the putting down of suicide. The latter had stirred his indignation to its depths just before he came to Italy, and his increased opportunities of solitary reflection since had strengthened and extended it. When he came therefore to think of his new story for Christmas time, he resolved to make it a plea for the poor. He did not want it to resemble his Carol, but the same kind of moral was in his mind. He was to try and convert Society, as he had converted Scrooge, by showing that its happiness rested on the same foundations as those of the individual, which are mercy and charity not less than justice. Whether right or wrong in these assumptions, need not be questioned here, where facts are merely stated to render intelligible what will follow; he had not made politics at any time a study, and they were always an instinct with him rather than a science; but the instinct was wholesome and sound, and to set class against class never[147] ceased to be as odious to him as he thought it righteous at all times to help each to a kindlier knowledge of the other. And so, here in Italy, amid the grand surroundings of this Palazzo Peschiere, the hero of his imagination was to be a sorry old drudge of a London ticket-porter, who in his anxiety not to distrust or think hardly of the rich, has fallen into the opposite extreme of distrusting the poor. From such distrust it is the object of the story to reclaim him; and, to the writer of it, the tale became itself of less moment than what he thus intended it to enforce. Far beyond mere vanity in authorship went the passionate zeal with which he began, and the exultation with which he finished, this task. When we met at its close, he was fresh from Venice, which had impressed him as "the wonder" and "the new sensation" of the world: but well do I remember how high above it all arose the hope that filled his mind. "Ah!" he said to me, "when I saw those places, how I thought that to leave one's hand upon the time, lastingly upon the time, with one tender touch for the mass of toiling people that nothing could obliterate, would be to lift oneself above the dust of all the Doges in their graves, and stand upon a giant's staircase that Sampson couldn't overthrow!" In varying forms this ambition was in all his life.
The picture I’m about to paint of him at work needs a little context to clarify his purpose. He was tackling a big topic for such a small instrument, and the mismatch was as typical of him as the suffering and passion he was about to endure for results that many would find laughable. He was determined, as he put it, to advocate for the poor. They had always been his focus, never far from his thoughts in any of his books, but this time, it was all that mattered. He had become, in short, intensely serious about it. A few months before he left England, I noticed he had started to take a more serious look at things he used to brush off lightly; he had come to realize that the ordinary methods of government were hopeless for solving significant political or social issues, a realization heavily influenced by Carlyle's writings. He had come to have as little faith in parliamentary discussions to resolve serious problems as he had in a then infamous city councilman's empty talk about stopping suicide. That had hurt him deeply just before he came to Italy, and his subsequent chance for solitary reflection had only strengthened and broadened those feelings. So, when it came time to think about his new Christmas story, he decided to make it a plea for the poor. He didn’t want it to feel like his Carol, but he had a similar moral in mind. He aimed to change society as he had changed Scrooge, showing that its happiness rested on the same principles as that of the individual: mercy and charity, not just justice. Whether he was right or wrong in this belief doesn’t need to be debated here; the point is just to clarify what’s coming next. He never truly studied politics; it had always been more of an instinct for him than a science. But that instinct was healthy and sound, and he always found the idea of pitting one class against another as disgusting, believing it was right to help people understand each other better. So, here in Italy, surrounded by the grandeur of the Palazzo Peschiere, the hero of his story was going to be a miserable old London ticket porter who, in his effort not to mistrust or judge the wealthy, had gone too far in distrusting the poor. The story aimed to reclaim him from that distrust, and for the writer, the tale itself mattered less than the message he wanted to convey. His passionate zeal for this task went far beyond mere vanity about authorship, and he finished it with undeniable satisfaction. When we met at the end, he had just returned from Venice, which had struck him as "the wonder" and "the new sensation" of the world. However, I remember how the hope that filled his mind rose high above everything else. "Ah!" he said to me, "when I saw those places, I thought how amazing it would be to leave a lasting impression on time, to create a gentle touch for the masses of hardworking people that nothing could erase. That would mean rising above the dust of all the Doges in their graves and standing on a giant's staircase that even Sampson couldn't take down!" This ambition had various forms throughout his life.
Another incident of these days will exhibit aspirations of a more solemn import that were not less part of his nature. It was depth of sentiment rather than clearness of faith which kept safe the belief on which they rested against all doubt or question of its sacredness, but every year seemed to strengthen it in him. This[148] was told me in his second letter after reaching the Peschiere; the first having sent me some such commissions in regard to his wife's family as his kindly care for all connected with him frequently led to. "Let me tell you," he wrote (30th of September), "of a curious dream I had, last Monday night; and of the fragments of reality I can collect; which helped to make it up. I have had a return of rheumatism in my back, and knotted round my waist like a girdle of pain; and had laid awake nearly all that night under the infliction, when I fell asleep and dreamed this dream. Observe that throughout I was as real, animated, and full of passion as Macready (God bless him!) in the last scene of Macbeth. In an indistinct place, which was quite sublime in its indistinctness, I was visited by a Spirit. I could not make out the face, nor do I recollect that I desired to do so. It wore a blue drapery, as the Madonna might in a picture by Raphael; and bore no resemblance to any one I have known except in stature. I think (but I am not sure) that I recognized the voice. Anyway, I knew it was poor Mary's spirit. I was not at all afraid, but in a great delight, so that I wept very much, and stretching out my arms to it called it 'Dear.' At this, I thought it recoiled; and I felt immediately, that not being of my gross nature, I ought not to have addressed it so familiarly. 'Forgive me!' I said. 'We poor living creatures are only able to express ourselves by looks and words. I have used the word most natural to our affections; and you know my heart.' It was so full of compassion and sorrow for me—which I knew spiritually, for, as I have said, I didn't perceive its emotions by its face—that it cut me to the heart; and[149] I said, sobbing, 'Oh! give me some token that you have really visited me!' 'Form a wish,' it said. I thought, reasoning with myself: 'If I form a selfish wish, it will vanish.' So I hastily discarded such hopes and anxieties of my own as came into my mind, and said, 'Mrs. Hogarth is surrounded with great distresses'—observe, I never thought of saying 'your mother' as to a mortal creature—'will you extricate her?' 'Yes.' 'And her extrication is to be a certainty to me, that this has really happened?' 'Yes.' 'But answer me one other question!' I said, in an agony of entreaty lest it should leave me. 'What is the True religion?' As it paused a moment without replying, I said—Good God in such an agony of haste, lest it should go away!—'You think, as I do, that the Form of religion does not so greatly matter, if we try to do good? or,' I said, observing that it still hesitated, and was moved with the greatest compassion for me, 'perhaps the Roman Catholic is the best? perhaps it makes one think of God oftener, and believe in him more steadily?' 'For you,' said the Spirit, full of such heavenly tenderness for me, that I felt as if my heart would break; 'for you, it is the best!' Then I awoke, with the tears running down my face, and myself in exactly the condition of the dream. It was just dawn. I called up Kate, and repeated it three or four times over, that I might not unconsciously make it plainer or stronger afterwards. It was exactly this. Free from all hurry, nonsense, or confusion, whatever. Now, the strings I can gather up, leading to this, were three. The first you know, from the main subject of my last letter. The second was, that there is a great altar in our bed-room, at which some family who once[150] inhabited this palace had mass performed in old time: and I had observed within myself, before going to bed, that there was a mark in the wall, above the sanctuary, where a religious picture used to be; and I had wondered within myself what the subject might have been, and what the face was like. Thirdly, I had been listening to the convent bells (which ring at intervals in the night), and so had thought, no doubt, of Roman Catholic services. And yet, for all this, put the case of that wish being fulfilled by any agency in which I had no hand; and I wonder whether I should regard it as a dream, or an actual Vision!" It was perhaps natural that he should omit, from his own considerations awakened by the dream, the very first that would have risen in any mind to which his was intimately known—that it strengthens other evidences, of which there are many in his life, of his not having escaped those trying regions of reflection which most men of thought and all men of genius have at some time to pass through. In such disturbing fancies during the next year or two, I may add that the book which helped him most was the Life of Arnold. "I respect and reverence his memory," he wrote to me in the middle of October, in reply to my mention of what had most attracted myself in it, "beyond all expression. I must have that book. Every sentence that you quote from it is the text-book of my faith."
Another incident from these days shows more serious aspirations that were just as much a part of him. It was the depth of feeling rather than clarity of belief that safeguarded the conviction on which they relied against all doubts or questions about its sacredness, and every year seemed to strengthen it within him. This[148] was shared in his second letter after he reached the Peschiere; the first contained some requests regarding his wife's family, which his thoughtful concern for all associated with him often led to. "Let me tell you," he wrote (September 30), "about a strange dream I had last Monday night, and the bits of reality that helped create it. I've had a flare-up of rheumatism in my back, tightening around my waist like a band of pain; I had been lying awake nearly all night under this discomfort when I finally dozed off and dreamed this dream. Just so you know, throughout the dream I was as real, animated, and passionate as Macready (God bless him!) in the final scene of Macbeth. In a vague place, which felt quite sublime in its vagueness, I was visited by a Spirit. I couldn’t make out its face, nor do I recall wishing to. It wore blue drapery, like the Madonna in a Raphael painting, and it didn’t resemble anyone I had known except in height. I think (but I’m not sure) that I recognized the voice. Anyway, I knew it was poor Mary's spirit. I felt no fear, only great joy, so much so that I cried a lot, and reaching out my arms to it, I called it 'Dear.' At this, I sensed it pulled back; and I immediately felt that, since it wasn’t of my earthly kind, I shouldn't have addressed it so casually. 'Forgive me!' I said. 'We poor living beings can only express ourselves with looks and words. I've used the term that feels most natural to our feelings; and you know my heart.' It was filled with compassion and sorrow for me—which I felt spiritually, since, as I mentioned, I didn’t perceive its emotions through its face—that it pierced my heart; and[149] I said, sobbing, 'Oh! give me some sign that you've truly visited me!' 'Make a wish,' it said. I thought to myself: 'If I make a selfish wish, it will disappear.' So I quickly threw out any hopes or worries of my own that came to mind, and instead said, 'Mrs. Hogarth is surrounded by great troubles'—notice, I never thought to say 'your mother' as to a living person—'will you help her?' 'Yes.' 'And to know her rescue is a certainty for me, that this has really happened?' 'Yes.' 'But answer me one more question!' I said, in a panic of pleading lest it should leave me. 'What is the True religion?' As it paused a moment without answering, I exclaimed—Good God in such a rush of anxiety, fearing it would vanish!—'You think, like I do, that the Form of religion doesn’t matter much if we strive to do good? or,' I said, noticing that it still hesitated, and was filled with the utmost compassion for me, 'maybe the Roman Catholic faith is the best? perhaps it makes one think of God more often, and believe in Him more firmly?' 'For you,' said the Spirit, full of such heavenly kindness for me that I felt as if my heart might break; 'for you, it is the best!' Then I woke up, with tears streaming down my face, and in exactly the state I was in during the dream. It was just dawn. I woke Kate and recounted it three or four times to ensure I wouldn’t unintentionally make it clearer or stronger later. It was precisely this. Completely devoid of hurry, nonsense, or confusion. Now, the threads I can piece together leading to this were three. The first you already know from the main topic of my last letter. The second is that there’s a significant altar in our bedroom where some family that once lived in this palace had mass performed long ago: and I had noticed before going to bed that there was a mark on the wall above the sanctuary where a religious picture once hung; and I had wondered what the subject might have been, and what the face looked like. Thirdly, I had been listening to the convent bells (which ring at intervals during the night), and thus had likely thought of Roman Catholic services. And yet, despite all this, suppose that wish were fulfilled by some means in which I had no part; would I consider it a dream or a genuine Vision?" It may have been natural for him to overlook, in his own reflections triggered by the dream, the very first thought that would have come to any mind familiar with his— that it strengthens other evidence, of which there are many in his life, showing he had not escaped those challenging realms of thought that most contemplative people and all geniuses must pass through at some point. For such unsettling thoughts over the next year or two, I can add that the book which helped him most was the Life of Arnold. "I respect and honor his memory," he wrote to me in mid-October, in response to my mentioning what had most drawn my attention in it, "beyond all expression. I must have that book. Every sentence you quote from it is the foundation of my faith."
He kept his promise that I should hear from him while writing, and I had frequent letters when he was fairly in his work. "With my steam very much up, I find it a great trial to be so far off from you, and consequently to have no one (always excepting Kate and[151] Georgy) to whom to expatiate on my day's work. And I want a crowded street to plunge into at night. And I want to be 'on the spot' as it were. But apart from such things, the life I lead is favourable to work." In his next letter: "I am in regular, ferocious excitement with the Chimes; get up at seven; have a cold bath before breakfast; and blaze away, wrathful and red-hot, until three o'clock or so; when I usually knock off (unless it rains) for the day . . . I am fierce to finish in a spirit bearing some affinity to those of truth and mercy, and to shame the cruel and the canting. I have not forgotten my catechism. 'Yes verily, and with God's help, so I will!'"
He kept his promise that I would hear from him while he was writing, and I received frequent letters when he was really into his work. "With my energy running high, I find it really tough to be so far away from you, and so to have no one (except for Kate and [151] Georgy) to talk to about my day's work. I also want a busy street to dive into at night. I want to be 'on the spot,' so to speak. But aside from those things, the life I lead is good for working." In his next letter: "I am in constant, intense excitement with the Chimes; I get up at seven; take a cold shower before breakfast; and go at it fiercely, angry and fired up, until about three o'clock, when I usually call it a day (unless it rains) . . . I’m determined to finish with a spirit that's somewhat aligned with truth and mercy, and to shame the harsh and the hypocritical. I haven't forgotten my catechism. 'Yes, indeed, and with God's help, so I will!'"
Within a week he had completed his first part, or quarter. "I send you to-day" (18th of October), "by mail, the first and longest of the four divisions. This is great for the first week, which is usually up-hill. I have kept a copy in shorthand in case of accidents. I hope to send you a parcel every Monday until the whole is done. I do not wish to influence you, but it has a great hold upon me, and has affected me, in the doing, in divers strong ways, deeply, forcibly. To give you better means of judgment I will sketch for you the general idea, but pray don't read it until you have read this first part of the MS." I print it here. It is a good illustration of his method in all his writing. His idea is in it so thoroughly, that, by comparison with the tale as printed, we see the strength of its mastery over his first design. Thus always, whether his tale was to be written in one or in twenty numbers, his fancies controlled him. He never, in any of his books, accomplished what he had wholly preconceived, often[152] as he attempted it. Few men of genius ever did. Once at the sacred heat that opens regions beyond ordinary vision, imagination has its own laws; and where characters are so real as to be treated as existences, their creator himself cannot help them having their own wills and ways. Fern the farm-labourer is not here, nor yet his niece the little Lilian (at first called Jessie) who is to give to the tale its most tragical scene; and there are intimations of poetic fancy at the close of my sketch which the published story fell short of. Altogether the comparison is worth observing.
Within a week, he had finished the first section, or quarter. "I'm sending you today" (October 18th), "by mail, the first and longest of the four parts. This is impressive for the first week, which is usually tough. I've kept a copy in shorthand in case anything goes wrong. I hope to send you a package every Monday until it’s all complete. I don't want to sway you, but I feel very connected to this project; it's impacted me in several intense ways while working on it. To give you a clearer idea, I’ll outline the general concept, but please don’t read it until you’ve gone through this first part of the manuscript." I’m including it here. It’s a good example of his style in all his writing. His idea is so embedded in it that, when compared to the printed story, we can see how strongly it shapes his initial vision. This is true no matter if his story was meant to be told in one or twenty installments; his imagination always guided him. In none of his books did he completely achieve what he originally envisioned, despite often trying. Few creative geniuses ever do. Once immersed in that special inspiration that reveals worlds beyond ordinary sight, imagination follows its own rules; and when characters are so lifelike that they seem to have their own existences, even their creator can’t help but let them follow their own paths. Fern the farmworker isn't here, nor is his niece, little Lilian (initially named Jessie), who is meant to bring the most tragic scene to the story; and there are hints of poetic creativity at the end of my outline that the published version didn’t capture. Overall, the comparison is worth noting.
"The general notion is this. That what happens to poor Trotty in the first part, and what will happen to him in the second (when he takes the letter to a punctual and a great man of business, who is balancing his books and making up his accounts, and complacently expatiating on the necessity of clearing off every liability and obligation, and turning over a new leaf and starting fresh with the new year), so dispirits him, who can't do this, that he comes to the conclusion that his class and order have no business with a new year, and really are 'intruding.' And though he will pluck up for an hour or so, at the christening (I think) of a neighbour's child, that evening: still, when he goes home, Mr. Filer's precepts will come into his mind, and he will say to himself, 'we are a long way past the proper average of children, and it has no business to be born:' and will be wretched again. And going home, and sitting there alone, he will take that newspaper out of his pocket, and reading of the crimes and offences of the poor, especially of those whom Alderman Cute is going to put down, will be quite confirmed[153] in his misgiving that they are bad; irredeemably bad. In this state of mind, he will fancy that the Chimes are calling, to him; and saying to himself 'God help me. Let me go up to 'em. I feel as if I were going to die in despair—of a broken heart; let me die among the bells that have been a comfort to me!'—will grope his way up into the tower; and fall down in a kind of swoon among them. Then the third quarter, or in other words the beginning of the second half of the book, will open with the Goblin part of the thing: the bells ringing, and innumerable spirits (the sound or vibration of them) flitting and tearing in and out of the church-steeple, and bearing all sorts of missions and commissions and reminders and reproaches, and comfortable recollections and what not, to all sorts of people and places. Some bearing scourges; and others flowers, and birds, and music; and others pleasant faces in mirrors, and others ugly ones: the bells haunting people in the night (especially the last of the old year) according to their deeds. And the bells themselves, who have a goblin likeness to humanity in the midst of their proper shapes, and who shine in a light of their own, will say (the Great Bell being the chief spokesman) Who is he that being of the poor doubts the right of poor men to the inheritance which Time reserves for them, and echoes an unmeaning cry against his fellows? Toby, all aghast, will tell him it is he, and why it is. Then the spirits of the bells will bear him through the air to various scenes, charged with this trust: That they show him how the poor and wretched, at the worst—yes, even in the crimes that aldermen put down, and he has[154] thought so horrible—have some deformed and hunchbacked goodness clinging to them; and how they have their right and share in Time. Following out the history of Meg the Bells will show her, that marriage broken off and all friends dead, with an infant child; reduced so low, and made so miserable, as to be brought at last to wander out at night. And in Toby's sight, her father's, she will resolve to drown herself and the child together. But before she goes down to the water, Toby will see how she covers it with a part of her own wretched dress, and adjusts its rags so as to make it pretty in its sleep, and hangs over it, and smooths its little limbs, and loves it with the dearest love that God ever gave to mortal creatures; and when she runs down to the water, Toby will cry 'Oh spare her! Chimes, have mercy on her! Stop her!'—and the bells will say, 'Why stop her? She is bad at heart—let the bad die.' And Toby on his knees will beg and pray for mercy: and in the end the bells will stop her, by their voices, just in time. Toby will see, too, what great things the punctual man has left undone on the close of the old year, and what accounts he has left unsettled: punctual as he is. And he will see a great many things about Richard, once so near being his son-in-law, and about a great many people. And the moral of it all will be, that he has his portion in the new year no less than any other man, and that the poor require a deal of beating out of shape before their human shape is gone; that even in their frantic wickedness there may be good in their hearts triumphantly asserting itself, though all the aldermen alive say 'No,' as he has learnt from the agony of his own child; and that the truth is[155] Trustfulness in them, not doubt, nor putting down, nor filing them away. And when at last a great sea rises, and this sea of Time comes sweeping down, bearing the alderman and such mudworms of the earth away to nothing, dashing them to fragments in its fury—Toby will climb a rock and hear the bells (now faded from his sight) pealing out upon the waters. And as he hears them, and looks round for help, he will wake up and find himself with the newspaper lying at his foot; and Meg sitting opposite to him at the table, making up the ribbons for her wedding to-morrow; and the window open, that the sound of the bells ringing the old year out and the new year in may enter. They will just have broken out, joyfully; and Richard will dash in to kiss Meg before Toby, and have the first kiss of the new year (he'll get it too); and the neighbours will crowd round with good wishes; and a band will strike up gaily (Toby knows a Drum in private); and the altered circumstances, and the ringing of the bells, and the jolly musick, will so transport the old fellow that he will lead off a country dance forthwith in an entirely new step, consisting of his old familiar trot. Then quoth the inimitable—Was it a dream of Toby's after all? Or is Toby but a dream? and Meg a dream? and all a dream! In reference to which, and the realities of which dreams are born, the inimitable will be wiser than he can be now, writing for dear life, with the post just going, and the brave C booted. . . . Ah how I hate myself, my dear fellow, for this lame and halting outline of the Vision I have in my mind. But it must go to you. . . . You will say what is best for the frontispiece". . . .[156]
"The basic idea is this. What happens to poor Trotty in the first part, and what will happen to him in the second (when he delivers a letter to a punctual and prominent businessman who is balancing his books, discussing the importance of clearing all debts and starting fresh with the new year), is so discouraging to him, since he can't do that, that he concludes that his class and situation have no place in a new year and are really 'intruding.' And though he'll manage to pull himself together for a short while during the christening (I believe) of a neighbor's child that evening, when he goes home, Mr. Filer's advice will creep into his mind, and he'll think to himself, 'We are far past the proper average of children, and there’s no reason for one to be born:' and will be miserable again. On his way home, sitting alone, he'll pull out that newspaper from his pocket and, reading about the crimes and offenses of the poor—especially those Alderman Cute is trying to put down—he will become even more convinced that they are inherently bad; irredeemably bad. In this frame of mind, he'll imagine that the Chimes are calling him; and saying to himself, 'God help me. Let me go to them. I feel as if I'm about to die from despair—of a broken heart; let me die among the bells that have brought me comfort!'—he will stumble his way up to the tower and collapse in a sort of faint among them. Then the third quarter, or in other words, the start of the second half of the book, will begin with the Goblin aspect of things: the bells ringing, and countless spirits (the sound or vibration of them) flitting in and out of the church steeple, carrying all sorts of messages, reminders, reproaches, comforting memories, and more, to various people and places. Some will carry whips; others flowers, birds, and music; others pleasant faces in mirrors, and others ugly ones: the bells haunting people at night (especially the last night of the old year) according to their actions. The bells themselves, who have a goblin resemblance to humanity amidst their proper shapes, and who shine with their own light, will say (with the Great Bell as the main spokesperson) Who is he that, being poor, doubts the rights of poor people to the inheritance Time has for them, and echoes a meaningless complaint against his fellow humans? Toby, all shocked, will admit that it is him, and explain why. Then the spirits of the bells will take him through the air to various scenes, on a mission to show him that even the poorest and most miserable, at their worst—yes, even in the crimes that aldermen denounce, which he has thought so horrendous—have some twisted and crippled goodness clinging to them; and how they are entitled to their share in Time. As they follow the story of Meg, the Bells will show her, with a marriage gone sour and all her friends dead, with an infant child; brought so low and made so miserable that she ends up wandering out at night. In Toby's view, her father’s, she will decide to drown herself and the child together. But just before she heads to the water, Toby will see her covering it with part of her own tattered dress, arranging its rags to make it look pretty in its sleep, leaning over it, smoothing its little limbs, and loving it with the deepest affection that God ever gave to any mortal; and when she rushes to the water, Toby will shout 'Oh spare her! Chimes, have mercy on her! Stop her!'—and the bells will respond, 'Why stop her? She is bad at heart—let the bad perish.' And Toby, on his knees, will plead for mercy: and in the end, the bells will stop her with their voices, just in time. Toby will also observe the significant things the punctual man has left unfinished at the end of the old year, and what accounts he has neglected to resolve: punctual as he is. He will learn many things about Richard, who was once so close to being his son-in-law, along with countless others. The moral of it all will be that he has just as much right to the new year as anyone else, and that the poor require a lot of shaping before their humanity fades; that even in their frantic wickedness, some good may be triumphantly asserting itself in their hearts, despite what all the alive aldermen say 'No,' as he learned from his child's suffering; and that the truth is Trust in them, not doubt, nor putting them down, nor dismissing them. And when at last a great sea rises, and this sea of Time comes rushing down, carrying the alderman and such worthless creatures of the earth away to nothing, smashing them to pieces in its fury—Toby will climb a rock and hear the bells (now out of his sight) ringing on the waters. And as he hears them, and looks around for help, he will wake up to find the newspaper at his feet; and Meg sitting across from him at the table, preparing ribbons for her wedding tomorrow; and the window open so the sound of the bells ringing out the old year and welcoming in the new year can come in. They will just have joyfully started ringing; and Richard will rush in to kiss Meg in front of Toby and receive the first kiss of the new year (he'll definitely get it); and the neighbors will gather around with good wishes; and a band will begin playing cheerfully (Toby knows a drummer personally); and the changed circumstances, the ringing of the bells, and the joyful music will so uplift the old man that he will immediately start a country dance in a completely new step, consisting of his old familiar trot. Then said the inimitable—Was it all just a dream of Toby's after all? Or is Toby merely a dream? And Meg a dream? And everything a dream! Regarding which, and the realities from which dreams are born, the inimitable will be wiser than he can be at this moment, writing for dear life, with the post just on its way, and the brave C all geared up. . . . Ah how I despise myself, my dear friend, for this clumsy and hesitant outline of the Vision I have in my mind. But it must go to you. . . . You will determine what’s best for the frontispiece." . . . [156]
With the second part or quarter, after a week's interval, came announcement of the enlargement of his plan, by which he hoped better to carry out the scheme of the story, and to get, for its following part, an effect for his heroine that would increase the tragic interest. "I am still in stout heart with the tale. I think it well-timed and a good thought; and as you know I wouldn't say so to anybody else, I don't mind saying freely thus much. It has great possession of me every moment in the day; and drags me where it will. . . . If you only could have read it all at once!—But you never would have done that, anyway, for I never should have been able to keep it to myself; so that's nonsense. I hope you'll like it. I would give a hundred pounds (and think it cheap) to see you read it. . . . Never mind."
With the second part or quarter, after a week's break, came the announcement of the expansion of his plan, which he hoped would better execute the story's scheme and create a deeper emotional impact for his heroine in the following section, increasing the tragic interest. "I'm still feeling positive about the tale. I think it's timely and a great concept; and as you know, I wouldn't say that to anyone else, so I feel okay sharing this much. It occupies my thoughts every moment of the day and pulls me in whatever direction it wants. . . . If only you could have read it all at once!—But you wouldn't have done that, anyway, because I could never have kept it to myself; so that’s pointless. I hope you enjoy it. I’d pay a hundred pounds (and think it’s worth it) to see you read it. . . . Never mind."
That was the first hint of an intention of which I was soon to hear more; but meanwhile, after eight more days, the third part came, with the scene from which he expected so much, and with a mention of what the writing of it had cost him. "This book (whether in the Hajji Baba sense or not I can't say, but certainly in the literal one) has made my face white in a foreign land. My cheeks, which were beginning to fill out, have sunk again; my eyes have grown immensely large; my hair is very lank; and the head inside the hair is hot and giddy. Read the scene at the end of the third part, twice. I wouldn't write it twice, for something. . . . You will see that I have substituted the name of Lilian for Jessie. It is prettier in sound, and suits my music better. I mention this, lest you should wonder who and what I mean by that name. To-morrow I shall begin afresh (starting the[157] next part with a broad grin, and ending it with the very soul of jollity and happiness); and I hope to finish by next Monday at latest. Perhaps on Saturday. I hope you will like the little book. Since I conceived, at the beginning of the second part, what must happen in the third, I have undergone as much sorrow and agitation as if the thing were real; and have wakened up with it at night. I was obliged to lock myself in when I finished it yesterday, for my face was swollen for the time to twice its proper size, and was hugely ridiculous." . . . His letter ended abruptly. "I am going for a long walk, to clear my head. I feel that I am very shakey from work, and throw down my pen for the day. There! (That's where it fell.)" A huge blot represented it, and, as Hamlet says, the rest was silence.
That was the first hint of an intention I would soon hear more about; but in the meantime, after eight more days, the third part arrived, featuring the scene he anticipated so much, along with a mention of what writing it had cost him. "This book (I can't say whether it's in the Hajji Baba sense or not, but definitely in the literal one) has turned my face pale in a foreign land. My cheeks, which were starting to fill out, have sunk again; my eyes have become incredibly large; my hair is very flat; and the head under the hair feels hot and dizzy. Read the scene at the end of the third part twice. I wouldn’t write it twice for just anything... You’ll see that I’ve changed the name Jessie to Lilian. It sounds prettier and fits my music better. I mention this so you won’t wonder who I mean by that name. Tomorrow I’ll start fresh (kicking off the next part with a big grin and wrapping it up with pure joy and happiness); and I hope to finish by next Monday at the latest. Maybe even on Saturday. I hope you’ll enjoy the little book. Ever since I figured out, at the start of the second part, what had to happen in the third, I’ve felt as much sorrow and anxiety as if it were real; I’ve even woken up at night thinking about it. I had to lock myself in when I finished it yesterday because my face was so swollen it looked like it was twice its normal size, which was pretty ridiculous.”... His letter ended abruptly. "I'm going for a long walk to clear my head. I feel really shaky from working, so I’m putting down my pen for the day. There! (That’s where it fell.)" A huge blot marked the spot, and as Hamlet says, the rest was silence.
Two days later, answering a letter from me that had reached in the interval, he gave sprightlier account of himself, and described a happy change in the weather. Up to this time, he protested, they had not had more than four or five clear days. All the time he had been writing they had been wild and stormy. "Wind, hail, rain, thunder and lightning. To-day," just before he sent me his last manuscript, "has been November slack-baked, the sirocco having come back; and to-night it blows great guns with a raging storm." "Weather worse," he wrote after three Mondays, "than any November English weather I have ever beheld, or any weather I have had experience of anywhere. So horrible to-day that all power has been rained and gloomed out of me. Yesterday, in pure determination to get the better of it, I walked twelve miles in[158] mountain rain. You never saw it rain. Scotland and America are nothing to it." But now all this was over. "The weather changed on Saturday night, and has been glorious ever since. I am afraid to say more in its favour, lest it should change again." It did not. I think there were no more complainings. I heard now of autumn days with the mountain wind lovely, enjoyable, exquisite past expression. I heard of mountain walks behind the Peschiere, most beautiful and fresh, among which, and along the beds of dry rivers and torrents, he could "pelt away," in any dress, without encountering a soul but the contadini. I heard of his starting off one day after finishing work, "fifteen miles to dinner—oh my stars! at such an inn!!!" On another day, of a party to dinner at their pleasant little banker's at Quinto six miles off, to which, while the ladies drove, he was able "to walk in the sun of the middle of the day and to walk home again at night." On another, of an expedition up the mountain on mules. And on another of a memorable tavern-dinner with their merchant friend Mr. Curry, in which there were such successions of surprising dishes of genuine native cookery that they took two hours in the serving, but of the component parts of not one of which was he able to form the remotest conception: the site of the tavern being on the city wall, its name in Italian sounding very romantic and meaning "the Whistle," and its bill of fare kept for an experiment to which, before another month should be over, he dared and challenged my cookery in Lincoln's-inn.
Two days later, in response to a letter I sent him, he shared a more upbeat update about himself and mentioned a positive change in the weather. Up until that point, he insisted, they hadn’t had more than four or five clear days. The entire time he had been writing, it had been wild and stormy. "Wind, hail, rain, thunder, and lightning. Today," just before he sent me his latest manuscript, "has been the kind of November weather that's just so-so because the sirocco has returned; and tonight it’s really blowing with a fierce storm." "The weather is worse," he wrote three Mondays later, "than any November weather I’ve ever seen in England or any bad weather I’ve experienced anywhere. It was so horrible today that all my energy has been wiped out. Yesterday, determined to overcome it, I walked twelve miles in mountain rain. You wouldn’t believe how hard it was raining. Scotland and America can’t compare." But all that was behind him now. "The weather changed on Saturday night, and it’s been beautiful ever since. I’m scared to say more good things about it, just in case it changes again." But it didn’t. I think there were no more complaints. I heard about autumn days with lovely mountain winds that were enjoyable and breathtaking beyond words. I heard about mountain walks behind the Peschiere that were stunningly beautiful and fresh, where he could "run around" in any outfit without running into anyone except for the local farmers. I heard about him heading out one day after finishing work, "fifteen miles to dinner—oh my goodness! at such an inn!!!" On another day, he went to dinner at their friendly little banker’s in Quinto, six miles away, where the ladies drove while he enjoyed "walking in the sun during the day and then walking home at night." On another occasion, he took a mule ride up the mountain. And yet another time, he enjoyed a memorable dinner at a tavern with their merchant friend Mr. Curry, where there was an amazing variety of surprising, authentic local dishes that took two hours to serve, but about which he could not even begin to guess the details: the tavern was located on the city wall, and its name in Italian sounded very romantic and meant "the Whistle," with a menu that he dared to challenge my cooking skill in Lincoln’s Inn before the month was over.
A visit from him to London was to be expected almost immediately! That all remonstrance would be[159] idle, under the restless excitement his work had awakened, I well knew. It was not merely the wish he had, natural enough, to see the last proofs and the woodcuts before the day of publication, which he could not otherwise do; but it was the stronger and more eager wish, before that final launch, to have a vivider sense than letters could give him of the effect of what he had been doing. "If I come, I shall put up at Cuttris's" (then the Piazza-hotel in Covent-garden) "that I may be close to you. Don't say to anybody, except our immediate friends, that I am coming. Then I shall not be bothered. If I should preserve my present fierce writing humour, in any pass I may run to Venice, Bologna, and Florence, before I turn my face towards Lincoln's-inn-fields; and come to England by Milan and Turin. But this of course depends in a great measure on your reply." My reply, dwelling on the fatigue and cost, had the reception I foresaw. "Notwithstanding what you say, I am still in the same mind about coming to London. Not because the proofs concern me at all (I should be an ass as well as a thankless vagabond if they did), but because of that unspeakable restless something which would render it almost as impossible for me to remain here and not see the thing complete, as it would be for a full balloon, left to itself, not to go up. I do not intend coming from here, but by way of Milan and Turin (previously going to Venice), and so, across the wildest pass of the Alps that may be open, to Strasburg. . . . As you dislike the Young England gentleman I shall knock him out, and replace him by a man (I can dash him in at your rooms in an hour) who recognizes no virtue in[160] anything but the good old times, and talks of them, parrot-like, whatever the matter is. A real good old city tory, in a blue coat and bright buttons and a white cravat, and with a tendency of blood to the head. File away at Filer, as you please; but bear in mind that the Westminster Review considered Scrooge's presentation of the turkey to Bob Cratchit as grossly incompatible with political economy. I don't care at all for the skittle-playing." These were among things I had objected to.
A visit from him to London was expected almost right away! I knew all objections would be pointless under the restless excitement his work had stirred up. It wasn’t just his natural desire to see the final proofs and the illustrations before the publication day—he couldn’t do that otherwise—but it was the stronger, more eager wish to really grasp the impact of what he had been working on, more than letters could convey, before that big launch. "If I come, I’ll stay at Cuttris’s" (then the Piazza hotel in Covent Garden) "so I can be close to you. Don’t tell anyone, except our close friends, that I’m coming. That way, I won’t be bothered. If I manage to keep my current intense writing mood, I might go to Venice, Bologna, and Florence before heading toward Lincoln's Inn Fields and coming to England via Milan and Turin. But of course, that depends a lot on what you say." My response, focusing on the fatigue and expense, got the reply I was expecting. "Despite what you say, I’m still set on coming to London. Not because the proofs matter to me at all (I’d be a fool as well as an ungrateful wanderer if they did), but because of that indescribable restless something that would make it almost impossible for me to stay here and not see the whole thing finished, just like it would be for a fully inflated balloon left alone, not to rise. I’m not coming from here, but via Milan and Turin (first going to Venice), and then crossing the wildest mountain pass in the Alps that might be open, to Strasbourg... Since you dislike the Young England gentleman, I’ll replace him with a guy (I can bring him to your rooms in an hour) who sees no value in anything but the good old days and talks about them mindlessly, no matter the topic. A real good old city Tory, in a blue coat with shiny buttons and a white cravat, and with a tendency to get flustered. Go ahead and criticize Filer as you like; just remember that the Westminster Review thought Scrooge's gift of the turkey to Bob Cratchit was totally out of line with political economy. I don’t care at all about the skittle-playing." These were some of the things I had raised as objections.
But the close of his letter revealed more than its opening of the reason, not at once so frankly confessed, for the long winter-journey he was about to make; and if it be thought that, in printing the passage, I take a liberty with my friend, it will be found that equal liberty is taken with myself, whom it goodnaturedly caricatures; so that the reader can enjoy his laugh at either or both. "Shall I confess to you, I particularly want Carlyle above all to see it before the rest of the world, when it is done; and I should like to inflict the little story on him and on dear old gallant Macready with my own lips, and to have Stanny and the other Mac sitting by. Now, if you was a real gent, you'd get up a little circle for me, one wet evening, when I come to town: and would say, 'My boy (sir, will you have the goodness to leave those books alone and to go downstairs—What the Devil are you doing! And mind, sir, I can see nobody—do you hear? Nobody. I am particularly engaged with a gentleman from Asia)—My boy, would you give us that little Christmas book (a little Christmas book of Dickens's, Macready, which I'm anxious you should hear); and don't slur it, now,[161] or be too fast, Dickens, please!'—I say, if you was a real gent, something to this effect might happen. I shall be under sailing orders the moment I have finished. And I shall produce myself (please God) in London on the very day you name. For one week: to the hour."
But the end of his letter revealed more than the beginning, which was not openly acknowledged, about the long winter journey he was about to take; and if it seems that, by printing this part, I'm being a bit presumptuous with my friend, you'll see that I'm just as much poking fun at myself, so the reader can have a laugh at either or both of us. "Shall I admit to you, I really want Carlyle more than anyone to see it before anyone else does, when it's finished; and I’d love to recount the little story to him and dear old brave Macready myself, with Stanny and the other Mac sitting nearby. Now, if you were a real gentleman, you'd arrange a little gathering for me one rainy evening when I come to town: and you would say, ‘My boy (mister, would you be so kind as to leave those books alone and come downstairs—What? on Earth are you doing! And remember, sir, I can't see anyone—do you hear? Nobody. I'm particularly busy with a gentleman from Asia)—My boy, could you give us that little Christmas book (a little Christmas book by Dickens, Macready, that I'm eager for you to hear); and please don’t rush it, Dickens, if you wouldn’t mind!’—I mean, if you were a real gentleman, something like this might actually happen. I'll be ready to go the moment I'm done. And I'll show up (God willing) in London on exactly the day you mentioned. For one week: to the hour."
The wish was complied with, of course; and that night in Lincoln's-inn-fields led to rather memorable issues. His next letter told me the little tale was done. "Third of November, 1844. Half-past two, afternoon. Thank God! I have finished the Chimes. This moment. I take up my pen again to-day; to say only that much; and to add that I have had what women call 'a real good cry!'" Very genuine all this, it is hardly necessary to say. The little book thus completed was not one of his greater successes, and it raised him up some objectors; but there was that in it which more than repaid the suffering its writing cost him, and the enmity its opinions provoked; and in his own heart it had a cherished corner to the last. The intensity of it seemed always best to represent to himself what he hoped to be longest remembered for; and exactly what he felt as to this, his friend Jeffrey warmly expressed. "All the tribe of selfishness, and cowardice and cant, will hate you in their hearts, and cavil when they can; will accuse you of wicked exaggeration, and excitement to discontent, and what they pleasantly call disaffection! But never mind. The good and the brave are with you, and the truth also."
The wish was granted, of course; and that night in Lincoln's Inn Fields led to some memorable events. His next letter told me the little story was finished. "November 3rd, 1844. 2:30 PM. Thank God! I have completed the Chimes. Just now. I'm picking up my pen again today to say just that; and to add that I've had what women call 'a good cry!'" This was all very genuine, it goes without saying. The little book he finished wasn’t one of his bigger hits, and it did raise some critics; but it contained something that more than compensated for the pain it caused him to write it, and the hostility its views sparked; and in his heart, he held a special place for it until the end. The intensity of it always seemed to best reflect what he hoped to be remembered for; and this is exactly what his friend Jeffrey enthusiastically conveyed. "All the people full of selfishness, cowardice, and pretense will secretly dislike you, and nitpick whenever they can; they’ll accuse you of wicked exaggeration and stirring up discontent, what they conveniently call disaffection! But don’t worry. The good and the brave are on your side, and so is the truth."
He resumed his letter on the fourth of November. "Here is the brave courier measuring bits of maps with a carving-fork, and going up mountains on a teaspoon. He and I start on Wednesday for Parma, Modena,[162] Bologna, Venice, Verona, Brescia, and Milan. Milan being within a reasonable journey from here, Kate and Georgy will come to meet me when I arrive there on my way towards England; and will bring me all letters from you. I shall be there on the 18th. . . . Now, you know my punctiwality. Frost, ice, flooded rivers, steamers, horses, passports, and custom-houses may damage it. But my design is, to walk into Cuttris's coffee-room on Sunday the 1st of December, in good time for dinner. I shall look for you at the farther table by the fire—where we generally go. . . . But the party for the night following? I know you have consented to the party. Let me see. Don't have any one, this particular night, to dinner, but let it be a summons for the special purpose at half-past 6. Carlyle, indispensable, and I should like his wife of all things: her judgment would be invaluable. You will ask Mac, and why not his sister? Stanny and Jerrold I should particularly wish; Edwin Landseer; Blanchard; perhaps Harness; and what say you to Fonblanque and Fox? I leave it to you. You know the effect I want to try . . . Think the Chimes a letter, my dear fellow, and forgive this. I will not fail to write to you on my travels. Most probably from Venice. And when I meet you (in sound health I hope) oh Heaven! what a week we will have."
He continued his letter on November 4th. "Here’s the brave courier measuring bits of maps with a carving fork and climbing mountains on a teaspoon. He and I are heading out on Wednesday for Parma, Modena,[162] Bologna, Venice, Verona, Brescia, and Milan. Since Milan is just a reasonable trip from here, Kate and Georgy will meet me when I arrive there on my way to England, and they’ll bring all your letters. I plan to be there on the 18th. ... You know how punctual I am. Frost, ice, flooded rivers, boats, horses, passports, and customs could mess that up. But my plan is to walk into Cuttris's coffee room on Sunday, December 1st, in time for dinner. I’ll look for you at the table by the fire—where we usually sit… But about the party on the following night? I know you’ve agreed to it. Let me see. Don’t have anyone over for dinner that particular night, but make it a gathering at half-past 6 for a special reason. Carlyle is essential, and I’d really like his wife to come: her judgment would be priceless. You will ask Mac, and why not his sister? I especially want Stanny and Jerrold; Edwin Landseer; Blanchard; maybe Harness; and what do you think about Fonblanque and Fox? I’ll leave it up to you. You know the vibe I want to create… Think of the Chimes as a letter, my dear friend, and forgive this. I won’t forget to write to you while I’m traveling. Most likely from Venice. And when I see you (hoping you’re in good health), oh my! what a week we’ll have."
CHAPTER VII.
ITALIAN TRAVEL.
1844.
So it all fell out accordingly. He parted from his disconsolate wife, as he told me in his first letter from Ferrara, on Wednesday the 6th of November: left her shut up in her palace like a baron's lady in the time of the crusades; and had his first real experience of the wonders of Italy. He saw Parma, Modena, Bologna, Ferrara, Venice, Verona, and Mantua. As to all which the impressions conveyed to me in his letters have been more or less given in his published Pictures. They are charmingly expressed. There is a sketch of a cicerone at Bologna which will remain in his books among their many delightful examples of his unerring and loving perception for every gentle, heavenly, and tender soul, under whatever conventional disguise it wanders here on earth, whether as poorhouse orphan or lawyer's clerk, architect's pupil at Salisbury or cheerful little guide to graves at Bologna; and there is another memorable description in his Rembrandt sketch, in form of a[164] dream, of the silent, unearthly, watery wonders of Venice. This last, though not written until after his London visit, had been prefigured so vividly in what he wrote at once from the spot, that those passages from his letter[90] may be read still with a quite undiminished interest. "I must not," he said, "anticipate myself. But, my dear fellow, nothing in the world that ever you have heard of Venice, is equal to the magnificent and stupendous reality. The wildest visions of the Arabian Nights are nothing to the piazza of Saint Mark, and the first impression of the inside of the church. The gorgeous and wonderful reality of Venice is beyond the fancy of the wildest dreamer. Opium couldn't build such a place, and enchantment couldn't shadow it forth in a vision. All that I have heard of it, read[165] of it in truth or fiction, fancied of it, is left thousands of miles behind. You know that I am liable to disappointment in such things from over-expectation, but Venice is above, beyond, out of all reach of coming near, the imagination of a man. It has never been rated high enough. It is a thing you would shed tears to see. When I came on board here last night (after a five miles' row in a gondola; which somehow or other, I wasn't at all prepared for); when, from seeing the city lying, one light, upon the distant water, like a ship, I came plashing through the silent and deserted streets; I felt as if the houses were reality—the water, fever-madness. But when, in the bright, cold, bracing day, I stood upon the piazza, this morning, by Heaven the glory of the place was insupportable! And diving down from that into its wickedness and gloom—its awful prisons, deep below the water; its judgment chambers, secret doors, deadly nooks, where the torches you carry with you blink as if they couldn't bear the air in which the frightful scenes were acted; and coming out again into the radiant, unsubstantial Magic of the town; and diving in again, into vast churches, and old tombs—a new sensation, a new memory, a new mind came upon me. Venice is a bit of my brain from this time. My dear Forster, if you could share my transports (as you would if you were here) what would I not give! I feel cruel not to have brought Kate and Georgy; positively cruel and base. Canaletti and Stanny, miraculous in their truth. Turner, very noble. But the reality itself, beyond all pen or pencil. I never saw the thing before that I should be afraid to describe. But to tell what Venice[166] is, I feel to be an impossibility. And here I sit alone, writing it: with nothing to urge me on, or goad me to that estimate, which, speaking of it to anyone I loved, and being spoken to in return, would lead me to form. In the sober solitude of a famous inn; with the great bell of Saint Mark ringing twelve at my elbow; with three arched windows in my room (two stories high) looking down upon the grand canal and away, beyond, to where the sun went down to-night in a blaze; and thinking over again those silent speaking faces of Titian and Tintoretto; I swear (uncooled by any humbug I have seen) that Venice is the wonder and the new sensation of the world! If you could be set down in it, never having heard of it, it would still be so. With your foot upon its stones, its pictures before you, and its history in your mind, it is something past all writing of or speaking of—almost past all thinking of. You couldn't talk to me in this room, nor I to you, without shaking hands and saying 'Good God my dear fellow, have we lived to see this!'"
So it all happened just like that. He said goodbye to his heartbroken wife in his first letter from Ferrara on Wednesday, November 6th. He left her locked up in her palace like a noblewoman during the Crusades and had his first real taste of the wonders of Italy. He visited Parma, Modena, Bologna, Ferrara, Venice, Verona, and Mantua. The impressions he shared with me in his letters are somewhat reflected in his published Pictures. They are beautifully written. There’s a sketch of a tour guide in Bologna that will remain in his books among the many delightful examples of his keen and loving perception of every gentle, heavenly, and tender soul, no matter the conventional disguise it wears here on earth, whether as a poor orphan or a lawyer's clerk, or an architect's apprentice in Salisbury, or a cheerful little guide to graves in Bologna; and there’s another memorable description in his Rembrandt sketch, presented as a[164] dream, of the serene, otherworldly, watery wonders of Venice. This last one, while written after his visit to London, had been so vividly foreshadowed in what he wrote right from the spot that those excerpts from his letter[90] can still be read with quite undiminished interest. "I must not," he said, "get ahead of myself. But, my dear friend, nothing in the world that you’ve heard about Venice compares to the magnificent, incredible reality. The wildest fantasies from the Arabian Nights are nothing compared to Saint Mark’s Square and the initial impression of the inside of the church. The beautiful and extraordinary reality of Venice is beyond what the wildest dreamer can imagine. Opium couldn't create such a place, and no magic could project it in a vision. Everything I’ve heard about it, read about it in truth or fiction, or imagined about it, is left thousands of miles behind. You know that I often get disappointed by such things due to over-expectation, but Venice is beyond anything within reach of a man's imagination. It has never been rated highly enough. It is something you would cry to see. When I came on board here last night (after a five-mile ride in a gondola that I somehow wasn't prepared for); when I saw the city resting, one light, upon the distant water, like a ship, and walked through the silent and deserted streets; I felt as if the houses were real—the water, a fevered madness. But when, this morning, in the bright, cold, invigorating day, I stood in the square, by Heaven, the glory of the place was overwhelming! And diving down from that into its darkness and gloom—its dreadful prisons, deep below the water; its judgment chambers, secret doors, and deadly corners, where the torches you carry blink as if they can’t bear the air that the terrifying scenes were played out in; and coming back again into the radiant, ethereal Magic of the town; and diving back into vast churches and ancient tombs—a new sensation, a new memory, a new perspective overtook me. Venice becomes a part of my brain from this moment on. My dear Forster, if you could share my excitement (as you would if you were here) what wouldn’t I give! I feel cruel for not bringing Kate and Georgy; genuinely cruel and thoughtless. Canaletti and Stanny are miraculous in their truth. Turner, quite noble. But the reality itself, beyond any pen or pencil. I’ve never encountered something before that I would be afraid to describe. But to express what Venice is, feels impossible. And here I sit alone, writing this: with nothing pushing me or driving me to reach that understanding, which, in discussing it with anyone I cared for, and being talked to in return, would lead me to form. In the quiet solitude of a famous inn; with the great bell of Saint Mark tolling twelve at my elbow; with three arched windows in my room (two stories high) looking down on the grand canal and beyond, to where the sun set tonight in a blaze; and reflecting again on those silent, expressive faces of Titian and Tintoretto; I swear (unmoved by any nonsense I have seen) that Venice is the wonder and the new sensation of the world! If you could be dropped into it, never having heard of it, it would still be like that. With your foot on its stones, its pictures before you, and its history in your mind, it is something beyond all writing or speaking about—almost beyond all thinking of. You couldn’t talk to me in this room, nor I to you, without shaking hands and saying ‘Good God my dear fellow, have we lived to see this!'"
Five days later, Sunday the 17th, he was at Lodi, from which he wrote to me that he had been, like Leigh Hunt's pig, up "all manner of streets" since he left his palazzo; that with one exception he had not on any night given up more than five hours to rest; that all the days except two had been bad ("the last two foggy as Blackfriars-bridge on Lord Mayor's day"); and that the cold had been dismal. But what cheerful, keen, observant eyes he carried everywhere; and, in the midst of new and unaccustomed scenes, and of objects and remains of art for which no previous study had prepared him, with what a delicate play of imagination[167] and fancy the minuteness and accuracy of his ordinary vision was exalted and refined; I think strikingly shown by the few unstudied passages I am preserving from these friendly letters. He saw everything for himself; and from mistakes in judging for himself which not all the learning and study in the world will save ordinary men, the intuition of genius almost always saved him. Hence there is hardly anything uttered by him, of this much-trodden and wearisomely-visited, but eternally beautiful and interesting country, that will not be found worth listening to.
Five days later, on Sunday the 17th, he was in Lodi, from which he wrote to me that he had been, like Leigh Hunt's pig, up "all kinds of streets" since he left his palazzo; that with one exception he hadn’t spent more than five hours resting on any night; that all the days except two had been bad ("the last two foggy as Blackfriars Bridge on Lord Mayor's Day"); and that the cold had been miserable. But what cheerful, sharp, observant eyes he had everywhere; and, in the midst of new and unfamiliar scenes, and of art objects and remains for which he had no prior preparation, with what a delicate imagination and fancy the detail and accuracy of his ordinary vision was heightened and refined; I think it’s strikingly shown by the few unstudied passages I’m keeping from these friendly letters. He saw everything for himself; and from mistakes in judgment that not all the knowledge and study in the world can save ordinary people from, the intuition of genius nearly always rescued him. So, there’s hardly anything he's said about this much-trodden and tiresomely-visited, yet eternally beautiful and interesting country, that won't be worth listening to.
"I am already brim-full of cant about pictures, and shall be happy to enlighten you on the subject of the different schools, at any length you please. It seems to me that the preposterous exaggeration in which our countrymen delight in reference to this Italy, hardly extends to the really good things.[91] Perhaps[168] it is in its nature, that there it should fall short. I have never seen any praise of Titian's great picture of the Transfiguration of the Virgin at Venice, which soared half as high as the beautiful and amazing reality. It is perfection. Tintoretto's picture too, of the Assembly of the Blest, at Venice also, with all the lines in it (it is of immense size and the figures are countless) tending majestically and dutifully to Almighty God in the centre, is grand and noble in the extreme. There are some wonderful portraits there, besides; and some confused, and hurried, and slaughterous battle pieces, in which the surprising art that[169] presents the generals to your eye, so that it is almost impossible you can miss them in a crowd though they are in the thick of it, is very pleasant to dwell upon. I have seen some delightful pictures; and some (at Verona and Mantua) really too absurd and ridiculous even to laugh at. Hampton-court is a fool to 'em—and oh there are some rum 'uns there, my friend. Some werry rum 'uns. . . . Two things are clear to me already. One is, that the rules of art are much too slavishly followed; making it a pain to you, when you go into galleries day after day, to be so very precisely sure where this figure will be turning round, and that figure will be lying down, and that other will have a great lot of drapery twined about him, and so forth. This becomes a perfect nightmare. The second is, that these great men, who were of necessity very much in the hands of the monks and priests, painted monks and priests a vast deal too often. I constantly see, in pictures of tremendous power, heads quite below the story and the painter; and I invariably observe that those heads are of the convent stamp, and have their counterparts, exactly, in the convent inmates of this hour. I see the portraits of monks I know at Genoa, in all the lame parts of strong paintings: so I have settled with myself that in such cases the lameness was not with the painter, but with the vanity and ignorance of his employers, who would be apostles on canvas at all events."[92]
"I'm already overwhelmed with talk about art and would be glad to share my thoughts on the different styles for as long as you'd like. It seems to me that the ridiculous exaggerations our countrymen have regarding Italy barely scratch the surface of the truly remarkable works.[91] Maybe it's just in the nature of things that it should fall short. I've never encountered praise for Titian's magnificent painting of the Transfiguration of the Virgin in Venice that comes anywhere close to capturing its incredible beauty. It’s perfection. Tintoretto's painting of the Assembly of the Blessed in Venice, with all its numerous figures and immense size, bravely and reverently directing attention to Almighty God at the center, is exceptionally grand. There are also some fantastic portraits there, as well as chaotic and bloody battle scenes, where the impressive artistry makes the generals stand out, making it nearly impossible to overlook them even in the midst of chaos—it's delightful to contemplate. I've seen some lovely paintings, and some in Verona and Mantua that were so absurd and ridiculous that they weren't even worth laughing at. Hampton Court can't compare to them—and oh, there are some truly bizarre ones there, my friend. Some really strange ones... Two things are already clear to me. One is that the rules of art are followed way too rigidly, which makes it frustrating to visit galleries day after day and precisely predict where this figure will be looking, that figure will be lying down, and that one will have a bunch of drapery around him, and so on. It becomes an absolute nightmare. The second is that these great artists, who were often under the control of monks and priests, painted monks and priests far too often. I often notice, in incredibly powerful paintings, heads that fall short compared to the rest of the story and the painter's work; and I consistently see that those heads resemble convent figures, just like the monks in the convents today. I recognize the faces of monks I know in Genoa in the less impressive parts of strong paintings: so I've concluded that in such cases, the weakness wasn't with the painter but rather with the vanity and ignorance of his patrons, who insisted on being depicted as apostles on canvas no matter what." [92]
In the same letter he described the Inns. "It is a[170] great thing—quite a matter of course—with English travellers, to decry the Italian inns. Of course you have no comforts that you are used to in England; and travelling alone, you dine in your bedroom always. Which is opposed to our habits. But they are immeasurably better than you would suppose. The attendants are very quick; very punctual; and so obliging, if you speak to them politely, that you would be a beast not to look cheerful, and take everything pleasantly. I am writing this in a room like a room on the two-pair front of an unfinished house in Eaton-square: the very walls make me feel as if I were a bricklayer distinguished by Mr. Cubitt with the favour of having it to take care of. The windows won't open, and the doors won't shut; and these latter (a cat could get in, between them and the floor) have a windy command of a colonnade which is open to the night, so that my slippers positively blow off my feet, and make little circuits in the room—like leaves. There is a very ashy wood-fire, burning on an immense hearth which has no fender (there is no such thing in Italy); and it only knows two extremes—an agony of heat when wood is put on, and an agony of cold when it has been on two minutes. There is also an uncomfortable stain in the wall, where the fifth door (not being strictly indispensable) was walled up a year or two ago, and never painted over. But the bed is clean; and I have had an excellent dinner; and without being obsequious or servile, which is not at all the characteristic of the people in the North of Italy, the waiters are so amiably disposed to invent little attentions which they suppose to be English, and are so lighthearted and goodnatured,[171] that it is a pleasure to have to do with them. But so it is with all the people. Vetturino-travelling involves a stoppage of two hours in the middle of the day, to bait the horses. At that time I always walk on. If there are many turns in the road, I necessarily have to ask my way, very often: and the men are such gentlemen, and the women such ladies, that it is quite an interchange of courtesies."
In the same letter, he described the inns. "It's a[170] common thing for English travelers to criticize Italian inns. Sure, you don’t have the comforts you’re used to in England; and when you’re traveling alone, you always eat in your bedroom. That’s not what we’re used to. But they’re way better than you’d think. The staff are very quick, punctual, and so accommodating, that if you speak to them politely, you’d have to be heartless not to stay cheerful and take things in stride. I'm writing this in a room that feels like a space in an unfinished house in Eaton Square: the walls make me feel like I’m a bricklayer entrusted by Mr. Cubitt to take care of it. The windows won’t open, and the doors won’t shut; there’s enough space under them for a cat to get in, and they create a draft to a colonnade that’s open to the night, so my slippers actually blow off my feet, swirling around the room like leaves. There’s a very ashy wood fire burning on a huge hearth that has no fender (that’s non-existent in Italy); and the fire only offers two extremes—blazing heat when you add wood, and freezing cold after just a couple of minutes. There’s also a bothersome stain on the wall where a fifth door (not strictly necessary) was sealed up a year or two ago, and hasn’t been painted over. But the bed is clean, I had a fantastic dinner, and without being overly polite or servile—which isn’t at all typical of the people in Northern Italy—the waiters are so eager to offer little gestures they think are English, and they’re so cheerful and friendly,[171] that it’s a joy to interact with them. The same goes for everyone else. Vetturino traveling requires a two-hour stop in the middle of the day to rest the horses. During that time, I always take a walk. If the road has many turns, I have to ask for directions often: and the men are such gentlemen, and the women such ladies, that it’s a lovely exchange of courtesies."
Of the help his courier continued to be to him I had whimsical instances in almost every letter, but he appears too often in the published book to require such celebration here. He is however an essential figure to two little scenes sketched for me at Lodi, and I may preface them by saying that Louis Roche, a native of Avignon, justified to the close his master's high opinion. He was again engaged for nearly a year in Switzerland, and soon after, poor fellow, though with a jovial robustness of look and breadth of chest that promised unusual length of days, was killed by heart-disease. "The brave C continues to be a prodigy. He puts out my clothes at every inn as if I were going to stay there twelve months; calls me to the instant every morning; lights the fire before I get up; gets hold of roast fowls and produces them in coaches at a distance from all other help, in hungry moments; and is invaluable to me. He is such a good fellow, too, that little rewards don't spoil him. I always give him, after I have dined, a tumbler of Sauterne or Hermitage or whatever I may have; sometimes (as yesterday) when we have come to a public-house at about eleven o'clock, very cold, having started before day-break and had nothing, I make him take his breakfast with me; and this renders him[172] only more anxious than ever, by redoubling attentions, to show me that he thinks he has got a good master . . . I didn't tell you that the day before I left Genoa, we had a dinner-party—our English consul and his wife; the banker; Sir George Crawford and his wife; the De la Rues; Mr. Curry; and some others, fourteen in all. At about nine in the morning, two men in immense paper caps enquired at the door for the brave C, who presently introduced them in triumph as the Governor's cooks, his private friends, who had come to dress the dinner! Jane wouldn't stand this, however; so we were obliged to decline. Then there came, at half-hourly intervals, six gentlemen having the appearance of English clergymen; other private friends who had come to wait. . . . We accepted their services; and you never saw anything so nicely and quietly done. He had asked, as a special distinction, to be allowed the supreme control of the dessert; and he had ices made like fruit, had pieces of crockery turned upside down so as to look like other pieces of crockery non-existent in this part of Europe, and carried a case of tooth-picks in his pocket. Then his delight was, to get behind Kate at one end of the table, to look at me at the other, and to say to Georgy in a low voice whenever he handed her anything, 'What does master think of datter 'rangement? Is he content?' . . . If you could see what these fellows of couriers are when their families are not upon the move, you would feel what a prize he is. I can't make out whether he was ever a smuggler, but nothing will induce him to give the custom-house-officers anything: in consequence of which that portmanteau of mine has been[173] unnecessarily opened twenty times. Two of them will come to the coach-door, at the gate of a town. 'Is there anything contraband in this carriage, signore?'—'No, no. There's nothing here. I am an Englishman, and this is my servant.' 'A buono mano signore?' 'Roche,'(in English) 'give him something, and get rid of him.' He sits unmoved. 'A buono mano signore?' 'Go along with you!' says the brave C. 'Signore, I am a custom-house-officer!' 'Well, then, more shame for you!'—he always makes the same answer. And then he turns to me and says in English: while the custom-house-officer's face is a portrait of anguish framed in the coach-window, from his intense desire to know what is being told to his disparagement: 'Datter chip,' shaking his fist at him, 'is greatest tief—and you know it you rascal—as never did en-razh me so, that I cannot bear myself!' I suppose chip to mean chap, but it may include the custom-house-officer's father and have some reference to the old block, for anything I distinctly know."
Of the help his courier continued to provide, I had amusing examples in almost every letter, but he appears so often in the published book that he doesn’t need further praise here. However, he is an important figure in two little scenes described for me at Lodi, and I should mention that Louis Roche, a native of Avignon, consistently proved his master's high opinion of him. He worked again for nearly a year in Switzerland, and soon after, the poor guy—despite looking robust and healthy—died from heart disease. "The brave C continues to be incredible. He lays out my clothes at every inn as if I were going to stay there for a year; calls me as soon as morning arrives; lights the fire before I even get up; manages to get roast chickens and has them ready in carriages, far from any other help, during hungry moments; and is invaluable to me. He’s such a good guy that small rewards don’t spoil him. After I’ve had dinner, I always give him a glass of Sauterne or Hermitage or whatever I have; sometimes (like yesterday) when we arrive at a pub around eleven in the morning, feeling cold and having started before dawn with nothing to eat, I make him have breakfast with me; this just makes him even more eager to show me that he thinks he has a good master . . . I didn’t tell you that the day before I left Genoa, we had a dinner party—our English consul and his wife; the banker; Sir George Crawford and his wife; the De la Rues; Mr. Curry; and a few others, totaling fourteen people. Around nine in the morning, two men in large paper hats asked for the brave C at the door, who then proudly introduced them as the Governor's cooks, his personal friends, who had come to prepare the dinner! Jane couldn’t handle that, though; so we had to say no. Then, at half-hour intervals, six gentlemen who looked like English clergymen showed up; more personal friends who had come to help. . . . We accepted their services; and you’ve never seen anything done so nicely and quietly. He had requested, as a special honor, to have full control over the dessert; and he made ices that looked like fruit, turned pieces of crockery upside down to resemble others not found in this part of Europe, and even carried a case of toothpicks in his pocket. Then his delight was to stand behind Kate at one end of the table, look at me from the other end, and ask Georgy in a low voice whenever he handed her something, 'What does the master think of that arrangement? Is he pleased?' . . . If you could see how these couriers are when their families aren’t on the move, you would understand what a gem he is. I can’t tell if he was ever a smuggler, but nothing will persuade him to give the customs officers anything: because of that, my portmanteau has been unnecessarily opened twenty times. Two of them will come to the coach door at the town gate. 'Is there anything illegal in this carriage, signore?'—'No, no. There’s nothing here. I’m English, and this is my servant.' 'A buono mano signore?' 'Roche,' (in English) 'give him something, and let’s get rid of him.' He remains unfazed. 'A buono mano signore?' 'Get lost!' says the brave C. 'Signore, I am a customs officer!' 'Well, then, more shame on you!'—he always gives the same reply. And then he turns to me and says in English, while the customs officer’s face looks like a portrait of anguish framed in the coach window, desperate to know what is being said about him: 'That chip,' shaking his fist at him, 'is the biggest thief—and you know it you rascal—as you’ve never hazed me so, that I can’t stand it!' I suppose 'chip' means 'chap,' but it might also imply the customs officer's father and refer to the old block, for all I know."
He closed his Lodi letter next day at Milan, whither his wife and her sister had made an eighty miles journey from Genoa, to pass a couple of days with him in Prospero's old Dukedom before he left for London. "We shall go our several ways on Thursday morning, and I am still bent on appearing at Cuttris's on Sunday the first, as if I had walked thither from Devonshire-terrace. In the meantime I shall not write to you again . . . to enhance the pleasure (if anything can enhance the pleasure) of our meeting . . . I am opening my arms so wide!" One more letter I had nevertheless; written at Strasburg on Monday night[174] the 25th; to tell me I might look for him one day earlier, so rapid had been his progress. He had been in bed only once, at Friburg for two or three hours, since he left Milan; and he had sledged through the snow on the top of the Simplon in the midst of prodigious cold. "I am sitting here in a wood-fire, and drinking brandy and water scalding hot, with a faint idea of coming warm in time. My face is at present tingling with the frost and wind, as I suppose the cymbals may, when that turbaned turk attached to the life guards' band has been newly clashing at them in St. James's-park. I am in hopes it may be the preliminary agony of returning animation."
He sealed his Lodi letter the next day in Milan, where his wife and her sister had traveled eighty miles from Genoa to spend a couple of days with him in Prospero's old Dukedom before he headed to London. "We’ll go our separate ways on Thursday morning, and I’m still planning to show up at Cuttris's on Sunday the first, as if I had walked there all the way from Devonshire-terrace. In the meantime, I won’t write to you again... to make our meeting even more enjoyable (if that’s even possible)... I’m opening my arms so wide!" However, I did get one more letter, written in Strasburg on Monday night, the 25th, letting me know I could expect him a day earlier since his journey had gone so quickly. He had only been in bed once, in Friburg for a couple of hours, since leaving Milan; and he had sledged through the snow on top of the Simplon in the middle of freezing temperatures. "I’m sitting here by a wood fire, drinking scalding hot brandy and water, with a vague hope of warming up soon. My face is currently tingling from the frost and wind, kind of like how the cymbals might feel after that turbaned Turk in the Life Guards band has been banging on them in St. James's Park. I hope this is just the initial discomfort before the warmth comes back."
There was certainly no want of animation when we met. I have but to write the words to bring back the eager face and figure, as they flashed upon me so suddenly this wintry Saturday night that almost before I could be conscious of his presence I felt the grasp of his hand. It is almost all I find it possible to remember of the brief, bright, meeting. Hardly did he seem to have come when he was gone. But all that the visit proposed he accomplished. He saw his little book in its final form for publication; and, to a select few brought together on Monday the 2nd of December at my house, had the opportunity of reading it aloud. An occasion rather memorable, in which was the germ of those readings to larger audiences by which, as much as by his books, the world knew him in his later life; but of which no detail beyond the fact remains in my memory, and all are now dead who were present at it excepting only Mr. Carlyle and myself. Among those however who have thus passed away was one, our excellent[175] Maclise, who, anticipating the advice of Captain Cuttle, had "made a note of" it in pencil, which I am able here to reproduce. It will tell the reader all he can wish to know. He will see of whom the party consisted; and may be assured (with allowance for a touch of caricature to which I may claim to be considered myself as the chief victim), that in the grave attention of Carlyle, the eager interest of Stanfield and Maclise, the keen look of poor Laman Blanchard, Fox's rapt solemnity, Jerrold's skyward gaze, and the tears of Harness and Dyce, the characteristic points of the scene are sufficiently rendered. All other recollection of it is passed and gone; but that at least its principal actor was made glad and grateful, sufficient farther testimony survives. Such was the report made of it, that once more, on the pressing intercession of our friend Thomas Ingoldsby (Mr. Barham), there was a second reading to which the presence and enjoyment of Fonblanque gave new zest;[93] and when I expressed to Dickens, after he left us, my grief that he had had so tempestuous a journey for such brief enjoyment, he replied that the visit had been one happiness and delight to him. "I would not recall an inch of the way to or from you, if it had been twenty times as long and twenty thousand times as wintry. It was worth any travel—anything! With the soil of the road in the very grain of my cheeks, I swear I wouldn't have[176] missed that week, that first night of our meeting, that one evening of the reading at your rooms, aye, and the second reading too, for any easily stated or conceived consideration."
There was definitely no lack of energy when we met. Just writing the words brings back the eager face and figure that flashed before me so suddenly that snowy Saturday night, almost before I could register his presence, I felt the grip of his hand. It’s almost all I can remember about the brief, bright meeting. He hardly seemed to have arrived before he was gone. But he accomplished everything he intended with the visit. He saw his little book in its final form for publication and had the chance to read it aloud to a select few gathered at my house on Monday, December 2nd. It was a memorable occasion, which was the start of those readings to larger audiences that made him known to the world as much as his books did later in life. However, all I remember now is the fact that everyone from that gathering has passed away except for Mr. Carlyle and me. Among those who have since departed was our wonderful Maclise, who, taking Captain Cuttle’s advice, had “made a note of” it in pencil, which I can reproduce here. It will give the reader everything they want to know. They will see who was at the gathering and can be assured (with a nod to a bit of caricature of which I can claim to be the primary victim) that the serious focus of Carlyle, the eager interest of Stanfield and Maclise, the intense expression of poor Laman Blanchard, Fox's deep solemnity, Jerrold's upward gaze, and the tears of Harness and Dyce capture the essence of the scene. All other memories of it have faded, but at least the main participant was made happy and grateful, and enough further evidence remains. Because of the report about it, once again, at the strong urging of our friend Thomas Ingoldsby (Mr. Barham), there was a second reading, to which Fonblanque’s presence added new enjoyment; and when I told Dickens, after he left us, how sorry I was that he had such a challenging journey for such a brief visit, he responded that the visit had been full of joy and delight for him. “I wouldn’t take back even an inch of the journey to or from you, even if it had been twenty times longer and twenty thousand times colder. It was worth any travel—anything! With the dust of the road still on my cheeks, I can honestly say I wouldn’t have missed that week, that first night we met, that one evening of the reading at your place, and yes, even the second reading, for any easily expressed or imagined reason.”
He wrote from Paris, at which he had stopped on his way back to see Macready, whom an engagement to act there with Mr. Mitchell's English company had prevented from joining us in Lincoln's-inn-fields. There had been no such frost and snow since 1829, and he gave dismal report of the city. With Macready he had gone two nights before to the Odéon to see Alexandre Dumas' Christine played by Madame St. George, "once Napoleon's mistress; now of an immense size, from dropsy I suppose; and with little weak legs which she can't stand upon. Her age, withal, somewhere about 80 or 90. I never in my life beheld such a sight. Every stage-conventionality she ever picked up (and she has them all) has got the dropsy too, and is swollen and bloated hideously. The other actors never looked at one another, but delivered all their dialogues to the pit, in a manner so egregiously unnatural and preposterous that I couldn't make up my mind whether to take it as a joke or an outrage." And then came allusion to a project we had started on the night of the reading, that a private play should be got up by us on his return from Italy. "You and I, sir, will reform this altogether." He had but to wait another night, however, when he saw it all reformed at the Italian opera where Grisi was singing in Il Pirato, and "the passion and fire of a scene between her, Mario, and Fornasari, was as good and great as it is possible for anything operatic to be. They drew on one another, the two[177] men—not like stage-players, but like Macready himself: and she, rushing in between them; now clinging to this one, now to that, now making a sheath for their naked swords with her arms, now tearing her hair in distraction as they broke away from her and plunged again at each other; was prodigious." This was the theatre at which Macready was immediately to act, and where Dickens saw him next day rehearse the scene before the doge and council in Othello, "not as usual facing the float but arranged on one side," with an effect that seemed to him to heighten the reality of the scene.
He wrote from Paris, where he had stopped on his way back to see Macready, who couldn't join us in Lincoln's Inn Fields because he was busy performing with Mr. Mitchell's English company. There hadn't been such frost and snow since 1829, and he gave a gloomy report about the city. Two nights earlier, he had gone with Macready to the Odéon to see Alexandre Dumas' Christine performed by Madame St. George, "once Napoleon's mistress; now she's incredibly large, probably because of dropsy; and she has little weak legs that she can't stand on. Her age is somewhere around 80 or 90. I have never seen anything like it. Every stage convention she ever learned (and she knows them all) has also become swollen and hideously bloated. The other actors never looked at each other, but delivered all their lines to the audience in such an absurdly unnatural and ridiculous way that I couldn't decide if I should treat it as a joke or an outrage." Then he mentioned a project we had started during the reading, that we should put on a private play when he returned from Italy. "You and I, sir, will completely change this." However, he only had to wait one more night, when he saw everything transformed at the Italian opera, where Grisi was singing in Il Pirato, and "the passion and intensity of a scene between her, Mario, and Fornasari was as good and powerful as anything operatic can be. The two men played off each other—not like regular actors, but like Macready himself: and she, rushing in between them; now clinging to one, now to the other, sometimes making a shield for their swords with her arms, sometimes tearing her hair in desperation as they pulled away from her and charged at each other again; it was incredible." This was the theatre where Macready was about to perform, and where Dickens saw him the next day rehearse the scene before the doge and council in Othello, "not as usual facing the front but positioned to one side," creating an effect that he thought heightened the realism of the scene.
He left Paris on the night of the 13th with the malle poste, which did not reach Marseilles till fifteen hours behind its time, after three days and three nights travelling over horrible roads. Then, in a confusion between the two rival packets for Genoa, he unwillingly detained one of them more than an hour from sailing; and only managed at last to get to her just as she was moving out of harbour. As he went up the side, he saw a strange sensation among the angry travellers whom he had detained so long; heard a voice exclaim "I am blarmed if it ain't Dickens!" and stood in the centre of a group of Five Americans! But the pleasantest part of the story is that they were, one and all, glad to see him; that their chief man, or leader, who had met him in New York, at once introduced them all round with the remark, "Personally our countrymen, and you, can fix it friendly sir, I do expectuate;" and that, through the stormy passage to Genoa which followed, they were excellent friends. For the greater part of the time, it is true, Dickens had to keep to his cabin; but he contrived to get enjoyment out of them[178] nevertheless. The member of the party who had the travelling dictionary wouldn't part with it, though he was dead sick in the cabin next to my friend's; and every now and then Dickens was conscious of his fellow-travellers coming down to him, crying out in varied tones of anxious bewilderment, "I say, what's French for a pillow?" "Is there any Italian phrase for a lump of sugar? Just look, will you?" "What the devil does echo mean? The garsong says echo to everything!" They were excessively curious to know, too, the population of every little town on the Cornice, and all its statistics; "perhaps the very last subjects within the capacity of the human intellect," remarks Dickens, "that would ever present themselves to an Italian steward's mind. He was a very willing fellow, our steward; and, having some vague idea that they would like a large number, said at hazard fifty thousand, ninety thousand, four hundred thousand, when they asked about the population of a place not larger than Lincoln's-inn-fields. And when they said Non Possible! (which was the leader's invariable reply), he doubled or trebled the amount; to meet what he supposed to be their views, and make it quite satisfactory."
He left Paris on the night of the 13th with the coach, which didn't arrive in Marseille until fifteen hours late, after three days and three nights traveling over terrible roads. Then, confused between the two competing boats for Genoa, he accidentally held one of them up for over an hour before it could leave; he only managed to board just as it was pulling out of the harbor. As he climbed aboard, he felt a strange reaction from the irritated passengers he had delayed for so long; he heard someone shout, "I'm damned if it ain't Dickens!" and found himself in the middle of a group of Five Americans! But the best part of the story is that they were all happy to see him; their leader, who had met him in New York, immediately introduced everyone with the remark, "Personally our countrymen, and you, can fix it friendly sir, I do expecturate;" and during the rough journey to Genoa that followed, they became great friends. For most of the time, it’s true, Dickens had to stay in his cabin; but he still found ways to enjoy their company. The member of the group with the travel dictionary wouldn’t let it go, even though he was feeling really ill in the cabin next to Dickens’; and from time to time, Dickens could hear his fellow passengers coming to him, asking in various tones of confused urgency, "I say, what's French for a pillow?" "Is there any Italian phrase for a lump of sugar? Can you check?" "What the heck does echo mean? The waiter says echo for everything!" They were also incredibly curious about the population of every little town along the coast and all its statistics; "perhaps the very last subjects within the capacity of the human intellect," Dickens notes, "that would ever occur to an Italian steward's mind. He was a very accommodating fellow, our steward; and, having some vague idea that they would like a big number, he randomly said fifty thousand, ninety thousand, four hundred thousand, when they asked about the population of a place not bigger than Lincoln's Inn Fields. When they exclaimed Non Possible! (which was the leader's standard response), he doubled or tripled the amount to match what he thought they wanted, making it totally satisfactory."
CHAPTER VIII.
LAST MONTHS IN ITALY.
1845.
On the 22nd of December he had resumed his ordinary Genoa life; and of a letter from Jeffrey, to whom he had dedicated his little book, he wrote as "most energetic and enthusiastic. Filer sticks in his throat rather, but all the rest is quivering in his heart. He is very much struck by the management of Lilian's story, and cannot help speaking of that; writing of it all indeed with the freshness and ardour of youth, and not like a man whose blue and yellow has turned grey." Some of its words have been already given. "Miss Coutts has sent Charley, with the best of letters to me, a Twelfth Cake weighing ninety pounds, magnificently decorated; and only think of the characters, Fairburn's Twelfth Night characters, being detained at the custom-house for Jesuitical surveillance! But these fellows[180] are—— Well! never mind. Perhaps you have seen the history of the Dutch minister at Turin, and of the spiriting away of his daughter by the Jesuits? It is all true; though, like the history of our friend's servant,[94] almost incredible. But their devilry is such that I am assured by our consul that if, while we are in the south, we were to let our children go out with servants on whom we could not implicitly rely, these holy men would trot even their small feet into churches with a view to their ultimate conversion! It is tremendous even to see them in the streets, or slinking about this garden." Of his purpose to start for the south of Italy in the middle of January, taking his wife with him, his letter the following week told me; dwelling on all he had missed, in that first Italian Christmas, of our old enjoyments of the season in England; and closing its pleasant talk with a postscript at midnight. "First of January, 1845. Many many many happy returns of the day! A life of happy years! The Baby is dressed in thunder, lightning, rain, and wind. His birth is most portentous here."
On December 22nd, he had resumed his normal life in Genoa; of a letter from Jeffrey, to whom he had dedicated his little book, he wrote as "most energetic and enthusiastic. Filer is kind of stuck in his throat, but everything else is full of feeling. He's really impressed by how Lilian's story is managed and can't stop talking about it; he's writing about it with the excitement and passion of youth, not like a man whose bright colors have faded to gray." Some of its words have already been shared. "Miss Coutts has sent Charley, along with a wonderful letter to me, a Twelfth Cake weighing ninety pounds, beautifully decorated; and just think, Fairburn's Twelfth Night characters are stuck at customs for Jesuit spying! But these guys are—— Well! never mind. Maybe you've heard the story of the Dutch minister in Turin and how the Jesuits took his daughter away? It's all true, although, like our friend's servant,[94] it's almost unbelievable. But their wickedness is such that our consul assures me that if, while we're in the south, we let our children go out with servants we can't fully trust, these holy men would even take them into churches with the aim of converting them! It's pretty terrifying to see them on the streets or sneaking around this garden." In his letter the following week, he mentioned his plans to head to southern Italy in mid-January, bringing his wife along, reflecting on everything he had missed during that first Italian Christmas and our old festive traditions in England; he wrapped up the cheerful conversation with a midnight postscript. "First of January, 1845. Wishing you many, many happy returns of the day! A life full of joyful years! The Baby is dressed in thunder, lightning, rain, and wind. His birth is quite ominous here."
It was of ill-omen to me, one of its earliest incidents being my only brother's death; but Dickens had a friend's true helpfulness in sorrow, and a portion of what he then wrote to me I permit myself to preserve[181] in a note[95] for what it relates of his own sad experiences and solemn beliefs and hopes. The journey southward began on the 20th January, and five days later I had a letter written from La Scala, at a little inn, "supported on low brick arches like a British haystack," the bed in their room "like a mangle," the ceiling without lath or plaster, nothing to speak of available for comfort or decency, and nothing particular to eat or drink. "But for all this I have become attached to the country and I don't care who knows it." They had left Pisa that morning and Carrara the day before: at the latter place an ovation awaiting him, the result of the zeal[182] of our eccentric friend Fletcher, who happened to be staying there with an English marble-merchant.[96] "There is a beautiful little theatre there, built of marble; and they had it illuminated that night, in my honour. There was really a very fair opera: but it is curious that the chorus has been always, time out of mind, made up of labourers in the quarries, who don't know a note of music, and sing entirely by ear. It was crammed to excess, and I had a great reception; a deputation waiting upon us in the box, and the orchestra turning out in a body afterwards and serenading us at Mr. Walton's." Between this and Rome they had a somewhat wild journey;[97] and before Radicofani was reached, there were disturbing rumours of bandits and even uncomfortable whispers as to their night's[183] lodging-place. "I really began to think we might have an adventure; and as I had brought (like an ass) a bag of Napoleons with me from Genoa, I called up all the theatrical ways of letting off pistols that I could call to mind, and was the more disposed to fire them from not having any." It ended in no worse adventure, however, than a somewhat exciting dialogue with an old professional beggar at Radicofani itself, in which he was obliged to confess that he came off second-best. It transpired at a little town hanging on a hill side, of which the inhabitants, being all of them beggars, had the habit of swooping down, like so many birds of prey, upon any carriage that approached it.
It was a bad sign for me, with the first bad moment being my only brother's death; but Dickens showed true friendship in my sorrow, and part of what he wrote to me back then I want to keep[181] in a note[95] for what it shares about his own sad experiences and serious beliefs and hopes. The trip south started on January 20th, and five days later I got a letter from La Scala, written from a little inn "propped up on low brick arches like a British haystack," with the bed in their room "like a mangle," the ceiling without lath or plaster, nothing available for comfort or decency, and nothing special to eat or drink. "But despite all this, I've grown fond of the country and I don't care who knows it." They had left Pisa that morning and Carrara the day before: at the latter place, a warm welcome awaited him, thanks to the enthusiasm of our quirky friend Fletcher, who happened to be there with an English marble merchant.[96] "There’s a beautiful little theater there, made of marble; and they lit it up that night in my honor. The opera was pretty good: but it’s funny that the chorus has always been made up of laborers from the quarries, who don’t know a note of music and sing completely by ear. It was packed to the brim, and I received a great welcome; a delegation came to visit us in the box, and the orchestra came out afterward to serenade us at Mr. Walton’s." Between this and Rome, they had a bit of a wild journey;[97] and before they got to Radicofani, there were unsettling rumors of bandits and even uncomfortable whispers about where they would stay the night. "I seriously started to think we might have an adventure; and since I had foolishly brought a bag of Napoleons with me from Genoa, I recalled all the theatrical ways of firing pistols that I could think of, and felt more inclined to shoot them off despite not having any." It ended up being no worse of an adventure than a somewhat exciting conversation with an old professional beggar at Radicofani itself, where he had to admit he came off second-best. It happened in a little town on a hillside, where the residents, all beggars, had a habit of swooping down like birds of prey on any carriage that approached.
"Can you imagine" (he named a first-rate bore, for whose name I shall substitute) "M. F. G. in a very frowsy brown cloak concealing his whole figure, and with very white hair and a very white beard, darting out of this place with a long staff in his hand, and begging? There he was, whether you can or not; out of breath with the rapidity of his dive, and staying with his staff all the Radicofani boys, that he might fight it out with me alone. It was very wet, and so was I: for I had kept, according to custom, my box-seat. It was blowing so hard that I could scarcely stand; and there was a custom-house on the spot, besides. Over and above all this, I had no small money; and the brave C never has, when I want it for a beggar. When I had excused myself several times, he suddenly drew himself up and said, with a wizard look (fancy the aggravation of M. F. G. as a wizard!) 'Do you know what you are doing, my lord? Do you mean to go on, to-day?'[184] 'Yes,' I said, 'I do.' 'My lord,' he said, 'do you know that your vetturino is unacquainted with this part of the country; that there is a wind raging on the mountain, which will sweep you away; that the courier, the coach, and all the passengers, were blown from the road last year; and that the danger is great and almost certain?' 'No,' I said, 'I don't.' 'My lord, you don't understand me, I think?' 'Yes I do, d—— you!' nettled by this (you feel it? I confess it). 'Speak to my servant. It's his business. Not mine'—for he really was too like M. F. G. to be borne. If you could have seen him!—'Santa Maria, these English lords! It's not their business, if they're killed! They leave it to their servants!' He drew off the boys; whispered them to keep away from the heretic; and ran up the hill again, almost as fast as he had come down. He stopped at a little distance as we moved on; and pointing to Roche with his long staff cried loudly after me, 'It's his business if you're killed, is it, my lord? Ha! ha! ha! whose business is it, when the English lords are born! Ha! ha! ha!' The boys taking it up in a shrill yell, I left the joke and them at this point. But I must confess that I thought he had the best of it. And he had so far reason for what he urged, that when we got on the mountain pass the wind became terrific, so that we were obliged to take Kate out of the carriage lest she should be blown over, carriage and all, and had ourselves to hang on to it, on the windy side, to prevent its going Heaven knows where!"
"Can you imagine" (he named a total bore, whose name I'll leave out) "M. F. G. in a scruffy brown coat that hid his whole body, with very white hair and a very white beard, rushing out of this place with a long stick in his hand, begging? There he was, whether you believe it or not; out of breath from his quick exit, using his stick to keep all the Radicofani boys at bay so he could confront me alone. It was pouring rain, and I was soaked too; I had stubbornly taken my usual spot on the box seat. The wind was so strong that I could hardly stand, and there was a customs office right there too. On top of everything, I had no spare change; the brave C never has any when I need it for a beggar. After I had declined a few times, he suddenly straightened up and said with a wizard-like expression (imagine M. F. G. as a wizard!) 'Do you know what you're doing, my lord? Do you plan to go on today?' [184] 'Yes,' I replied, 'I do.' 'My lord,' he said, 'are you aware that your driver doesn't know this area; that there's a fierce wind raging on the mountain that could blow you away; that last year, the courier, the coach, and all the passengers were blown off the road; and that the danger is real and almost certain?' 'No,' I said, 'I didn't know.' 'My lord, I don't think you understand me?' 'Yes, I do, damn you!' I snapped back (can you feel it? I admit it). 'Talk to my servant. It's his responsibility. Not mine'—because he really was too much like M. F. G. for me to put up with. If you could have seen him!—'Santa Maria, these English lords! They don't care if they get killed! They leave it to their servants!' He pulled the boys away, told them to stay clear of the heretic, and ran back up the hill almost as fast as he had come down. He paused a little distance away as we moved on, and pointing at Roche with his long stick shouted after me, 'It's his responsibility if you get killed, is it, my lord? Ha! ha! ha! whose responsibility is it when English lords are born! Ha! ha! ha!' The boys picked up his yell, and I left the joke and them at that point. But I have to admit I thought he had the upper hand. And he did have some reason for what he said, because when we reached the mountain pass the wind was brutal, forcing us to take Kate out of the carriage so she wouldn't be blown away, and we had to hold on to it on the windy side to stop it from getting blown who knows where!"
The first impression of Rome was disappointing. It was the evening of the 30th of January, and the cloudy[185] sky, dull cold rain, and muddy footways, he was prepared for; but he was not prepared for the long streets of commonplace shops and houses like Paris or any other capital, the busy people, the equipages, the ordinary walkers up and down. "It was no more my Rome, degraded and fallen and lying asleep in the sun among a heap of ruins, than Lincoln's-inn-fields is. So I really went to bed in a very indifferent humour." That all this yielded to later and worthier impressions I need hardly say; and he had never in his life, he told me afterwards, been so moved or overcome by any sight as by that of the Coliseum, "except perhaps by the first contemplation of the Falls of Niagara." He went to Naples for the interval before the holy week; and his first letter from it was to say that he had found the wonderful aspects of Rome before he left, and that for loneliness and grandeur of ruin nothing could transcend the southern side of the Campagna. But farther and farther south the weather had become worse; and for a week before his letter (the 11th of February), the only bright sky he had seen was just as the sun was coming up across the sea at Terracina. "Of which place, a beautiful one, you can get a very good idea by imagining something as totally unlike the scenery in Fra Diavolo as possible." He thought the bay less striking at Naples than at Genoa, the shape of the latter being more perfect in its beauty, and the smaller size enabling you to see it all at once, and feel it more like an exquisite picture. The city he conceived the greatest dislike to.[98] "The condition of the common[186] people here is abject and shocking. I am afraid the conventional idea of the picturesque is associated with such misery and degradation that a new picturesque will have to be established as the world goes onward. Except Fondi, there is nothing on earth that I have seen so dirty as Naples. I don't know what to liken the streets to where the mass of the lazzaroni live. You recollect that favourite pigstye of mine near Broadstairs? They are more like streets of such apartments heaped up story on story, and tumbled house on house,[187] than anything else I can think of, at this moment." In a later letter he was even less tolerant. "What would I give that you should see the lazzaroni as they really are—mere squalid, abject, miserable animals for vermin to batten on; slouching, slinking, ugly, shabby, scavenging scarecrows! And oh the raffish counts and more than doubtful countesses, the noodles and the blacklegs, the good society! And oh the miles of miserable streets and wretched occupants,[99] to which Saffron-hill or the Borough-mint is a kind of small gentility, which are found to be so picturesque by English lords and ladies; to whom the wretchedness left behind at home is lowest of the low, and vilest of the vile, and commonest of all common things. Well! well! I have often thought that one of the best chances of immortality for a writer is in the Death of his language, when he immediately becomes good company; and I often think here,—What would you say to these people, milady and milord, if they spoke out of the homely dictionary of your own 'lower orders.'" He was again at Rome on Sunday the second of March.
The first impression of Rome was unsatisfying. It was the evening of January 30th, and he was ready for the cloudy sky, dull cold rain, and muddy streets, but he wasn’t ready for the long streets of ordinary shops and houses that reminded him of Paris or any other capital, the busy people, the carriages, the regular pedestrians moving about. "It was no more my Rome, degraded and fallen and lying asleep in the sun among a heap of ruins, than Lincoln's Inn Fields is. So I went to bed feeling quite indifferent." I barely need to say that this changed with later and more meaningful impressions; he later told me that he had never been as moved or overwhelmed by anything as he was by the sight of the Coliseum, "except maybe the first look at the Falls of Niagara." He traveled to Naples during the time before Holy Week, and his first letter from there said he had discovered the beautiful aspects of Rome before leaving, noting that nothing compared to the loneliness and grandeur of ruin on the southern side of the Campagna. But as he went further south, the weather got worse; and for a week before his letter (February 11th), the only clear sky he had seen was just as the sun was rising over the sea at Terracina. "You can get a good idea of that beautiful place by imagining something as unlike the scenery in Fra Diavolo as possible." He found the bay at Naples less impressive than at Genoa, saying that the shape of the latter was more perfectly beautiful, and its smaller size allowed you to see it all at once, feeling more like an exquisite picture. He developed a strong dislike for the city. "The condition of the common people here is appalling and shocking. I'm afraid the typical idea of the picturesque is tied to such misery and degradation that a new picturesque will need to be created as the world moves forward. Except for Fondi, there's nothing I've seen that’s as dirty as Naples. I can’t think of anything to compare the streets where the majority of the lazzaroni live. Remember that favorite pigsty of mine near Broadstairs? Those streets are more like stories of such apartments piled up on top of each other and houses crammed together than anything else I can think of right now." In a later letter, he was even harsher. "What would I give for you to see the lazzaroni as they really are—mere filthy, miserable creatures for vermin to thrive on; slouching, sneaky, ugly, shabby, scavenging scarecrows! And the shabby counts and even more dubious countesses, the fools and the thieves, the so-called upper class! And the endless miserable streets and their wretched residents, to which Saffron Hill or Borough Mint resembles a kind of low gentility, that English lords and ladies find so picturesque; to them, the wretchedness left behind at home is the lowest of the low, the vilest of the vile, and the most ordinary of all ordinary things. Well! I've often thought that one of the best chances for a writer's immortality comes with the death of their language, when they instantly become good company; and I often think here—What would you say to these people, milady and milord, if they spoke from the simple dictionary of your own 'lower classes'?" He returned to Rome on Sunday, March 2nd.
Sad news from me as to a common and very dear friend awaited him there; but it is a subject on which I may not dwell farther than to say that there arose from it much to redeem even such a sorrow, and that this I could not indicate better than by these wise and[188] tender words from Dickens. "No philosophy will bear these dreadful things, or make a moment's head against them, but the practical one of doing all the good we can, in thought and deed. While we can, God help us! ourselves stray from ourselves so easily; and there are all around us such frightful calamities besetting the world in which we live; nothing else will carry us through it. . . . What a comfort to reflect on what you tell me. Bulwer Lytton's conduct is that of a generous and noble-minded man, as I have ever thought him. Our dear good Procter too! And Thackeray—how earnest they have all been! I am very glad to find you making special mention of Charles Lever. I am glad over every name you write. It says something for our pursuit, in the midst of all its miserable disputes and jealousies, that the common impulse of its followers, in such an instance as this, is surely and certainly of the noblest."
I'm sad to share that I have bad news about a mutual and very dear friend waiting there; however, it's a topic I can’t delve into too much. I can only say that much good came from it, even amidst the sorrow, and I can't express this better than with these wise and [188] tender words from Dickens: "No philosophy can withstand these dreadful things or defend against them for even a moment, except the practical approach of doing all the good we can, in thought and action. While we still can, God help us! We easily stray from our true selves, and the world around us is filled with such terrible misfortunes; nothing else will help us get through it. . . . It's comforting to reflect on what you've shared with me. Bulwer Lytton's actions show him to be a generous and noble-minded man, just as I have always believed. Our dear good Procter too! And Thackeray—how sincere they have all been! I'm really glad to see you mentioning Charles Lever. I'm pleased about every name you write. It speaks volumes about our field, amidst all its miserable disputes and jealousies, that the shared motivation of its followers, in a situation like this, is undeniably of the highest standard."
After the ceremonies of the holy week, of which the descriptions sent to me were reproduced in his book, he went to Florence,[100] which lived always afterwards in[189] his memory with Venice, and with Genoa. He thought these the three great Italian cities. "There are some places here,[101]—oh Heaven how fine! I wish you could see the tower of the palazzo Vecchio as it lies before me at this moment, on the opposite bank of[190] the Arno! But I will tell you more about it, and about all Florence, from my shady arm-chair up among the Peschiere oranges. I shall not be sorry to sit down in it again. . . . Poor Hood, poor Hood! I still look for his death, and he still lingers on. And Sydney Smith's brother gone after poor dear Sydney himself! Maltby will wither when he reads it; and poor old Rogers will contradict some young man at dinner, every day for three weeks."
After the holy week ceremonies, which were described in the book he sent me, he went to Florence,[100] a city that he always remembered alongside[189] Venice and Genoa. He considered these three to be the great Italian cities. "There are some incredible places here,[101]—oh, how beautiful! I wish you could see the tower of the Palazzo Vecchio as it stands before me right now, across the Arno! I’ll tell you more about it, and about all of Florence, from my comfy chair among the Peschiere oranges. I won’t mind sitting in it again. . . . Poor Hood, poor Hood! I keep expecting his death, yet he’s still hanging on. And Sydney Smith’s brother has passed away, following dear Sydney! Maltby will be devastated when he hears this; and poor old Rogers will argue with some young guy at dinner every day for three weeks."
Before he left Florence (on the 4th of April) I heard of a "very pleasant and very merry day" at Lord Holland's; and I ought to have mentioned how much he was gratified, at Naples, by the attentions of the English Minister there, Mr. Temple, Lord Palmerston's brother, whom he described as a man supremely agreeable, with everything about him in perfect taste, and with that truest gentleman-manner which has its root in kindness and generosity of nature. He was back at home in the Peschiere on Wednesday the ninth of April. Here he continued to write to me every week, for as long as he remained, of whatever he had seen: with no definite purpose as yet, but the pleasure of interchanging with myself the impressions and emotions undergone by him. "Seriously," he wrote to me on the 13th of April, "it is a great pleasure to me to find that you are really pleased with these shadows in the water, and think them worth the looking at. Writing at such odd places, and in such odd seasons, I have been half savage with myself, very often, for not doing better. But d'Orsay, from whom I had a charming letter three days since, seems to think as you do of what he has read in those shown to[191] him, and says they remind him vividly of the real aspect of these scenes. . . . Well, if we should determine, after we have sat in council, that the experiences they relate are to be used, we will call B. and E. to their share and voice in the matter." Shortly before he left, the subject was again referred to (7th of June). "I am in as great doubt as you about the letters I have written you with these Italian experiences. I cannot for the life of me devise any plan of using them to my own satisfaction, and yet think entirely with you that in some form I ought to use them." Circumstances not in his contemplation at this time settled the form they ultimately took.
Before he left Florence (on April 4th), I heard about a "very pleasant and very merry day" at Lord Holland's; and I should have mentioned how much he appreciated the attention of the English Minister in Naples, Mr. Temple, Lord Palmerston's brother, whom he described as a remarkably agreeable man, with everything about him in great taste, and with that true gentlemanly manner rooted in kindness and generosity. He was back home in the Peschiere on Wednesday, April 9th. He continued to write to me every week for as long as he stayed, sharing whatever he had seen: without any specific goal yet, just the joy of exchanging impressions and emotions with me. "Honestly," he wrote to me on April 13th, "it really pleases me to know that you enjoy these reflections in the water and find them worth observing. Writing in such unusual places and at such odd times, I've often felt quite frustrated with myself for not doing better. But d'Orsay, who sent me a lovely letter three days ago, seems to feel the same way you do about what he has read from the pieces I showed him, saying they remind him vividly of the true appearance of these scenes. . . . Well, if we decide, after we meet, that the experiences they describe are to be used, we will involve B. and E. in the conversation." Just before he left, the topic came up again (on June 7th). "I'm as uncertain as you are about the letters I've written to you about these Italian experiences. I can't come up with any plan to use them to my own satisfaction, yet I completely agree with you that I should use them in some way." Circumstances beyond his anticipation at that time determined the final format they would take.
Two more months were to finish his Italian holiday, and I do not think he enjoyed any part of it so much as its close. He had formed a real friendship for Genoa, was greatly attached to the social circle he had drawn round him there, and liked rest after his travel all the more for the little excitement of living its activities over again, week by week, in these letters to me. And so, from his "shady arm-chair up among the Peschiere oranges," I had at regular intervals what he called his rambling talk; went over with him again all the roads he had taken; and of the more important scenes and cities, such as Venice, Rome, and Naples, received such rich filling-in to the first outlines sent, as fairly justified the title of Pictures finally chosen for them. The weather all the time too had been without a flaw. "Since our return," he wrote on the 27th April, "we have had charming spring days. The garden is one grove of roses; we have left off fires; and we breakfast and dine again in the great hall, with[192] the windows open. To-day we have rain, but rain was rather wanted I believe, so it gives offence to nobody. As far as I have had an opportunity of judging yet, the spring is the most delightful time in this country. But for all that I am looking with eagerness to the tenth of June, impatient to renew our happy old walks and old talks in dear old home."
Two more months were left to wrap up his Italian holiday, and I don’t think he enjoyed any part of it as much as the end. He had developed a real friendship with Genoa, felt very connected to the social circle he had built there, and appreciated the rest after his travels even more because of the little thrill of reliving those experiences week by week through his letters to me. So, from his "shady armchair among the Peschiere oranges," I regularly received what he called his rambling talk; we revisited all the roads he had traveled, and for the more significant scenes and cities like Venice, Rome, and Naples, he provided such rich details that beautifully justified the title of Pictures that was ultimately chosen for them. The weather had also been perfect the whole time. "Since our return," he wrote on April 27th, "we’ve had lovely spring days. The garden is a sea of roses; we’ve stopped needing fires; and we’re having breakfast and dinner again in the great hall, with[192] the windows open. Today we have rain, but I believe that was needed, so it doesn’t bother anyone. From what I can tell so far, spring is the most delightful time in this country. Still, I’m eagerly looking forward to June 10th, excited to resume our happy old walks and talks in dear old home."
Of incidents during these remaining weeks there were few, but such as he mentioned had in them points of humour or character still worth remembering.[102] Two men were hanged in the city; and two ladies of quality, he told me, agreed to keep up for a time a prayer for the souls of these two miserable creatures so incessant that Heaven should never for a moment be left alone; to which end "they relieved each other" after such wise, that, for the whole of the stated time, one of them was always on her knees in the cathedral church of San Lorenzo. From which he inferred that "a morbid sympathy for criminals is not wholly peculiar to England, though it affects more people in that country perhaps than in any other."
During the remaining weeks, there weren't many incidents, but the ones he mentioned had elements of humor or character still worth remembering.[102] Two men were hanged in the city, and he told me that two ladies of high standing decided to continuously pray for the souls of these two unfortunate individuals, ensuring that Heaven would never be left unattended. To achieve this, "they took turns" in such a way that, throughout the entire designated time, one of them was always on her knees in the cathedral church of San Lorenzo. From this, he concluded that "a morbid sympathy for criminals isn't solely unique to England, although it may affect more people there than anywhere else."
Of Italian usages to the dead some notices from his letters have been given, and he had an example before he left of the way in which they affected English residents. A gentleman of his friend Fletcher's acquaintance living four miles from Genoa had the misfortune to lose his wife; and no attendance on the dead beyond the city gate, nor even any decent conveyance, being practicable, the mourner, to whom Fletcher had promised nevertheless the sad satisfaction of an English funeral, which he had meanwhile taken enormous secret pains to arrange with a small Genoese upholsterer, was waited upon, on the appointed morning, by a very bright yellow hackney-coach-and-pair driven by a coachman in yet brighter scarlet knee-breeches and waistcoat, who wanted to put the husband and the body inside together. "They were obliged to leave one of the coach-doors open for the accommodation even of the coffin; the widower walked beside the carriage to the Protestant cemetery; and Fletcher followed on a big grey horse."[103]
Of Italian customs regarding the dead, some notes from his letters have been shared, and he had an example before he left of how they impacted English residents. A gentleman who was a friend of Fletcher's, living four miles from Genoa, unfortunately lost his wife; and since no funeral services could be held outside the city gates, nor was there any decent means of transport available, the mourning husband, to whom Fletcher had promised the somber comfort of an English funeral—which he had secretly arranged with a small Genoese upholsterer—was met, on the scheduled morning, by a bright yellow hackney carriage pulled by a pair of horses, driven by a coachman in even brighter scarlet knee breeches and waistcoat, who wanted to fit both the husband and the coffin inside together. "They had to leave one of the coach doors open to fit the coffin; the widower walked alongside the carriage to the Protestant cemetery, and Fletcher followed on a large grey horse."[103]
Scarlet breeches reappear, not less characteristically, in what his next letter told of a couple of English travellers who took possession at this time (24th of May) of a portion of the ground floor of the Peschiere. They had with them a meek English footman who immediately confided to Dickens's servants, among other personal grievances, the fact that he was made to do everything, even cooking, in crimson breeches; which in a hot climate, he protested, was "a grinding of him down." "He is a poor soft country fellow; and his master locks him up at night, in a basement room with iron bars to the window. Between which our servants poke wine in, at midnight. His master and mistress buy old boxes at the curiosity shops, and pass their lives in lining 'em with bits of parti-coloured velvet. A droll existence, is it not? We are lucky to have had the palace to ourselves until now, but it is so large that we never see or hear these people; and I should not have known even, if they had not called upon us, that another portion of the ground floor had been taken by some friends of old Lady Holland—whom I seem to see again, crying about dear Sydney Smith, behind that green screen as we last saw her together."[104]
Scarlet pants show up again, just as characteristically, in what his next letter mentioned about a couple of English travelers who took over part of the ground floor of the Peschiere at this time (May 24th). They brought with them a timid English footman who immediately confided to Dickens's servants, among other personal complaints, that he was made to do everything, even cooking, while wearing crimson pants; which, in a hot climate, he insisted was "wearing him down." "He is a poor soft country fellow, and his master locks him up at night in a basement room with iron bars on the window. Our servants slide wine in through the bars at midnight. His master and mistress buy old boxes from curiosity shops and spend their lives lining them with pieces of colorful velvet. What a funny existence, right? We’ve been lucky to have the palace to ourselves until now, but it’s so big that we never see or hear these people; I wouldn’t have even known if they hadn’t come to visit us that another part of the ground floor had been taken by some friends of old Lady Holland—whom I can still picture crying about dear Sydney Smith behind that green screen the last time we saw her together."[104]
Then came a little incident also characteristic. An English ship of war, the Phantom, appeared in the harbour; and from her commander, Sir Henry Nicholson, Dickens received, among attentions very pleasant to him, an invitation to lunch on board and bring his wife, for whom, at a time appointed, a boat was to be sent to the Ponte Reale (the royal bridge). But no boat being there at the time, Dickens sent off his servant in another boat to the ship to say he feared some mistake. "While we were walking up and down a neighbouring piazza in his absence, a brilliant fellow in a dark blue shirt with a white hem to it all round the collar, regular corkscrew curls, and a face as brown as a berry, comes up to me and says 'Beg your pardon sir—Mr. Dickens?' 'Yes.' 'Beg your pardon sir, but I'm one of the ship's company of the Phantom sir, cox'en of the cap'en's gig sir, she's a lying off the pint sir—been there half an hour.' 'Well but my good fellow,' I said, 'you're at the wrong place!' 'Beg your pardon sir, I was afeerd it was the wrong place sir, but I've asked them Genoese here sir, twenty times, if it was Port Real; and they knows no more than a dead jackass!'—Isn't it a good thing to have made a regular Portsmouth name of it?"
Then came a little incident that really stood out. An English warship, the Phantom, showed up in the harbor, and its commander, Sir Henry Nicholson, invited Dickens to have lunch on board and bring his wife. A boat was supposed to be sent to the Ponte Reale (the royal bridge) at a planned time for this. However, since no boat was there when needed, Dickens sent his servant in another boat to the ship to explain that he was worried there might be a misunderstanding. "While we were pacing back and forth in a nearby square during his absence, a sharp-dressed guy in a dark blue shirt with a white collar, corkscrew curls, and a sun-kissed face came up to me and said, 'Excuse me, sir—Mr. Dickens?' 'Yes.' 'Excuse me, sir, but I’m part of the crew of the Phantom, coxswain of the captain’s gig, sir—she’s anchored off the point, been there for half an hour.' 'Well, my good fellow,' I replied, 'you’re at the wrong place!' 'I beg your pardon, sir, I was afraid it was the wrong place but I’ve asked these Genoese here twenty times if this is Port Real; and they don’t know any more than a dead donkey!'—Isn't it great to have turned it into a proper Portsmouth name?"
That was in his letter of the 1st June, which began by telling me it had been twice begun and twice flung into the basket, so great was his indisposition to write as the time for departure came; and which ended thus. "The fire-flies at night now, are miraculously splendid; making another firmament among the rocks on the seashore, and the vines inland. They get into the bedrooms, and fly about, all night, like beautiful little[196] lamps.[105] . . . I have surrendered much I had fixed my heart upon, as you know, admitting you have had reason for not coming to us here: but I stand by the hope that you and Mac will come and meet us at Brussels; it being so very easy. A day or two there, and at Antwerp, would be very happy for us; and we could still dine in Lincoln's-inn-fields on the day of arrival." I had been unable to join him in Genoa, urgently as he had wished it: but what is said here was done, and Jerrold was added to the party.
That was in his letter from June 1st, which started by saying it had been started twice and thrown in the trash twice because he was so reluctant to write as the departure approached; and it ended like this. "The fireflies at night now are incredibly beautiful, creating another sky among the rocks by the seashore and the vines inland. They get into the bedrooms and flutter around all night like lovely little[196] lamps.[105] . . . I’ve given up much that I had my heart set on, as you know, acknowledging that you had good reasons for not coming here: but I still hold on to the hope that you and Mac will come and meet us in Brussels; it’s very easy to arrange. A day or two there, and in Antwerp, would make us very happy; and we could still have dinner in Lincoln's Inn Fields on the day of arrival." I hadn’t been able to join him in Genoa, no matter how much he wanted me to: but what is mentioned here happened, and Jerrold was added to the group.
His last letter from Genoa was written on the 7th of June, not from the Peschiere, but from a neighbouring palace, "Brignole Rosso," into which he had fled from the miseries of moving. "They are all at sixes and sevens up at the Peschiere, as you may suppose; and Roche is in a condition of tremendous excitement, engaged in settling the inventory with the house-agent, who has just told me he is the devil himself. I had been appealed to, and had contented myself with this expression of opinion. 'Signor Noli, you are an old impostor!'[197] 'Illustrissimo,' said Signor Noli in reply, 'your servant is the devil himself: sent on earth to torture me.' I look occasionally towards the Peschiere (it is visible from this room), expecting to see one of them flying out of a window. Another great cause of commotion is, that they have been paving the lane by which the house is approached, ever since we returned from Rome. We have not been able to get the carriage up since that time, in consequence; and unless they finish to-night, it can't be packed in the garden, but the things will have to be brought down in baskets, piecemeal, and packed in the street. To avoid this inconvenient necessity, the Brave made proposals of bribery to the paviours last night, and induced them to pledge themselves that the carriage should come up at seven this evening. The manner of doing that sort of paving work here, is to take a pick or two with an axe, and then lie down to sleep for an hour. When I came out, the Brave had issued forth to examine the ground; and was standing alone in the sun among a heap of prostrate figures: with a Great Despair depicted in his face, which it would be hard to surpass. It was like a picture—'After the Battle'—Napoleon by the Brave: Bodies by the Paviours."
His last letter from Genoa was written on June 7th, not from the Peschiere, but from a nearby palace, "Brignole Rosso," where he had escaped from the chaos of moving. "Things are a complete mess up at the Peschiere, as you can imagine; and Roche is in a state of extreme excitement, busy sorting out the inventory with the estate agent, who just told me he’s the devil himself. I was asked for my opinion and settled for that remark. 'Signor Noli, you’re an old fraud!' 'Illustrissimo,' Signor Noli replied, 'your servant is the devil himself: sent to earth to torment me.' I occasionally look towards the Peschiere (it’s visible from this room), expecting to see one of them leap out of a window. Another major source of chaos is that they’ve been repaving the lane leading to the house ever since we returned from Rome. We haven’t been able to get the carriage up since then, and unless they finish tonight, it can’t be packed in the garden. The items will have to be brought down in baskets, piece by piece, and packed on the street. To avoid this inconvenient situation, the Brave made bribery proposals to the pavers last night and got them to promise that the carriage would come up at seven this evening. The way they do paving work around here is to take a pick or two with an axe and then lie down for a nap for an hour. When I came out, the Brave had gone to inspect the site; he was standing alone in the sun among a pile of fallen figures, with a look of Great Despair etched on his face that’s hard to beat. It was like a painting—'After the Battle'—Napoleon by the Brave: Bodies by the Pavers."
He came home by the Great St. Gothard, and was quite carried away by what he saw of Switzerland. The country was so divine that he should have wondered indeed if its sons and daughters had ever been other than a patriotic people. Yet, infinitely above the country he had left as he ranked it in its natural splendours, there was something more enchanting than these that he lost in leaving Italy; and he expressed this delightfully[198] in the letter from Lucerne (14th of June) which closes the narrative of his Italian life.
He returned home via the Great St. Gothard and was completely amazed by what he experienced in Switzerland. The beauty of the country was so impressive that he would have truly believed its people were nothing but patriotic. However, far surpassing the natural beauty of the land he had just left, there was something even more captivating that he felt he lost in leaving Italy; he expressed this joyfully[198] in the letter from Lucerne (June 14th) that wraps up his Italian journey.
"We came over the St. Gothard, which has been open only eight days. The road is cut through the snow, and the carriage winds along a narrow path between two massive snow walls, twenty feet high or more. Vast plains of snow range up the mountain-sides above the road, itself seven thousand feet above the sea; and tremendous waterfalls, hewing out arches for themselves in the vast drifts, go thundering down from precipices into deep chasms, here and there and everywhere: the blue water tearing through the white snow with an awful beauty that is most sublime. The pass itself, the mere pass over the top, is not so fine, I think, as the Simplon; and there is no plain upon the summit, for the moment it is reached the descent begins. So that the loneliness and wildness of the Simplon are not equalled there. But being much higher, the ascent and the descent range over a much greater space of country; and on both sides there are places of terrible grandeur, unsurpassable, I should imagine, in the world. The Devil's Bridge, terrific! The whole descent between Andermatt (where we slept on Friday night) and Altdorf, William Tell's town, which we passed through yesterday afternoon, is the highest sublimation of all you can imagine in the way of Swiss scenery. Oh God! what a beautiful country it is! How poor and shrunken, beside it, is Italy in its brightest aspect!
"We came over the St. Gothard, which has been open for only eight days. The road is carved through the snow, and the carriage winds along a narrow path between two enormous snow walls, twenty feet high or more. Vast expanses of snow stretch up the mountain sides above the road, which is itself seven thousand feet above sea level; and massive waterfalls, carving out arches for themselves in the huge drifts, thunder down from cliffs into deep chasms, appearing here and there: the blue water crashing through the white snow with a stunning beauty that is breathtaking. The pass itself, merely the passage over the top, isn’t as remarkable, I think, as the Simplon; and there’s no flat area at the summit because as soon as you arrive, the descent begins. So the solitude and wildness of the Simplon can’t be matched there. But since it’s much higher, the ascent and the descent cover a much larger area; and on both sides, there are places of incredible grandeur, unmatched, I imagine, anywhere in the world. The Devil's Bridge—terrifying! The entire descent between Andermatt (where we stayed on Friday night) and Altdorf, William Tell's town, which we passed through yesterday afternoon, is the ultimate representation of what you can imagine in terms of Swiss scenery. Oh God! what a beautiful country it is! How small and diminished Italy seems beside it, even in its brightest moments!"
"I look upon the coming down from the Great St. Gothard with a carriage and four horses and only one postilion, as the most dangerous thing that a carriage[199] and horses can do. We had two great wooden logs for drags, and snapped them both like matches. The road is like a geometrical staircase, with horrible depths beneath it; and at every turn it is a toss-up, or seems to be, whether the leaders shall go round or over. The lives of the whole party may depend upon a strap in the harness; and if we broke our rotten harness once yesterday, we broke it at least a dozen times. The difficulty of keeping the horses together in the continual and steep circle, is immense. They slip and slide, and get their legs over the traces, and are dragged up against the rocks; carriage, horses, harness, all a confused heap. The Brave, and I, and the postilion, were constantly at work, in extricating the whole concern from a tangle, like a skein of thread. We broke two thick iron chains, and crushed the box of a wheel, as it was; and the carriage is now undergoing repair, under the window, on the margin of the lake: where a woman in short petticoats, a stomacher, and two immensely long tails of black hair hanging down her back very nearly to her heels, is looking on—apparently dressed for a melodrama, but in reality a waitress at this establishment.
I see coming down from the Great St. Gothard with a carriage and four horses, driven by just one postilion, as the most dangerous thing a carriage and horses can do. We had two big wooden logs for brakes, and we snapped both of them like matchsticks. The road is like a geometric staircase, with terrifying drops beneath it; and at every turn, it feels like a gamble whether the lead horses will go around or over. The lives of everyone in the carriage might depend on a strap in the harness, and if we broke our worn-out harness once yesterday, we broke it at least a dozen times. It's incredibly hard to keep the horses together in the constant steep curves. They slip and slide, get their legs tangled in the traces, and end up getting dragged against the rocks; carriage, horses, harness—all in a jumbled mess. The Brave, the postilion, and I were constantly working to untangle everything, like pulling apart a knotted skein of thread. We broke two thick iron chains and crushed the box of one wheel, and now the carriage is being repaired beneath the window by the lake, where a woman in a short petticoat and bodice, with two long black braids hanging down almost to her heels, is watching—seemingly dressed for a melodrama, but actually just a waitress at this place.
"If the Swiss villages look beautiful to me in winter, their summer aspect is most charming: most fascinating: most delicious. Shut in by high mountains capped with perpetual snow; and dotting a rich carpet of the softest turf, overshadowed by great trees; they seem so many little havens of refuge from the troubles and miseries of great towns. The cleanliness of the little baby-houses of inns is wonderful to those who come from Italy. But the beautiful Italian manners, the[200] sweet language, the quick recognition of a pleasant look or cheerful word; the captivating expression of a desire to oblige in everything; are left behind the Alps. Remembering them, I sigh for the dirt again: the brick floors, bare walls, unplaistered ceilings, and broken windows."
"If the Swiss villages look beautiful to me in winter, their summer appearance is even more charming, fascinating, and delightful. Nestled among high mountains topped with eternal snow and scattered across a lush carpet of the softest grass, shaded by large trees, they seem like little havens of refuge from the troubles and sorrows of big cities. The cleanliness of the tiny, cozy inns is astonishing for those coming from Italy. However, the beautiful Italian manners, the sweet language, the quick appreciation of a friendly glance or cheerful word, and the charming eagerness to help in every way are left behind in the Alps. Thinking of them, I long for the dirt again: the brick floors, bare walls, unplastered ceilings, and broken windows."
We met at Brussels; Maclise, Jerrold, myself, and the travellers; passed a delightful week in Flanders together; and were in England at the close of June.
We met in Brussels; Maclise, Jerrold, myself, and the travelers; spent a wonderful week together in Flanders; and returned to England at the end of June.
CHAPTER IX.
AGAIN IN ENGLAND. 1845-1846.
His first letter after again taking possession of Devonshire-terrace revived a subject on which opinions had been from time to time interchanged during his absence, and to which there was allusion in the agreement executed before his departure. The desire was still as strong with him as when he started Master Humphrey's Clock to establish a periodical, that, while relieving his own pen by enabling him to receive frequent help from other writers, might yet retain always the popularity of his name. "I really think I have an idea, and not a bad one, for the periodical. I have turned it over, the last two days, very much in my mind: and think it positively good. I incline still to weekly; price three halfpence, if possible; partly original, partly select; notices of books, notices of theatres, notices of all good things, notices of all bad ones; Carol philosophy, cheerful views, sharp anatomization of humbug, jolly good temper; papers always in season,[202] pat to the time of year; and a vein of glowing, hearty, generous, mirthful, beaming reference in everything to Home, and Fireside. And I would call it, sir,—
His first letter after taking back Devonshire-terrace brought up a topic that had been discussed occasionally during his absence, and that was mentioned in the agreement signed before he left. His desire was still as strong as when he started Master Humphrey's Clock to create a magazine that would not only allow him to get regular help from other writers but also keep his name popular. "I really think I have a solid idea for the magazine. I've been thinking about it a lot over the last two days and I genuinely believe it’s a good one. I still prefer a weekly format; pricing it at three halfpennies if possible; partly original, partly curated content; reviews of books, reviews of theaters, reviews of all good things, reviews of all bad ones; Carol philosophy, upbeat perspectives, a sharp critique of nonsense, cheerful attitude; articles that are always relevant,[202] fitting the season; and a warm, hearty, generous, and joyful connection to Home and Fireside in everything. And I would call it, sir,—
A cheerful creature that chirrups on the Hearth.
Natural History.
"Now, don't decide hastily till you've heard what I would do. I would come out, sir, with a prospectus on the subject of the Cricket that should put everybody in a good temper, and make such a dash at people's fenders and arm-chairs as hasn't been made for many a long day. I could approach them in a different mode under this name, and in a more winning and immediate way, than under any other. I would at once sit down upon their very hobs; and take a personal and confidential position with them which should separate me, instantly, from all other periodicals periodically published, and supply a distinct and sufficient reason for my coming into existence. And I would chirp, chirp, chirp away in every number until I chirped it up to——well, you shall say how many hundred thousand! . . . Seriously, I feel a capacity in this name and notion which appears to give us a tangible starting-point, and a real, defined, strong, genial drift and purpose. I seem to feel that it is an aim and name which people would readily and pleasantly connect with me; and that, for a good course and a clear one, instead of making circles pigeon-like at starting, here we should[203] be safe. I think the general recognition would be likely to leap at it; and of the helpful associations that could be clustered round the idea at starting, and the pleasant tone of which the working of it is susceptible, I have not the smallest doubt. . . . But you shall determine. What do you think? And what do you say? The chances are, that it will either strike you instantly, or not strike you at all. Which is it, my dear fellow? You know I am not bigoted to the first suggestions of my own fancy; but you know also exactly how I should use such a lever, and how much power I should find in it. Which is it? What do you say?—I have not myself said half enough. Indeed I have said next to nothing; but like the parrot in the negro-story, I 'think a dam deal.'"
"Now, don’t make a hasty decision until you’ve heard what I would do. I’d come out, sir, with a proposal about Cricket that would put everyone in a good mood and make a bigger splash than anything in a long time. I could approach people differently with this name, in a more charming and direct way than with any other. I would immediately settle right in, taking a personal and friendly stance that would set me apart from all other regularly published magazines, giving a clear reason for my existence. And I would keep chirping away in every issue until I reached—well, you decide how many hundreds of thousands! Seriously, I feel a real potential in this name and idea that gives us a solid starting point, with a clear, defined, strong, and friendly purpose. I sense that it’s something people would easily and happily associate with me; and that, for a clear path forward, instead of just going around in circles at the start, we’d be safe here. I believe the general response would likely be enthusiastic; and I have no doubt about the supportive associations that could develop around the idea from the beginning, along with the pleasant tone that could come from it. But you get to decide. What do you think? What do you say? Chances are, this will either resonate with you immediately or not at all. Which is it, my dear friend? You know I’m not attached to my first thoughts, but you also know exactly how I would use this idea and how much weight I’d find in it. What is it? What do you say?—I haven’t said nearly enough. In fact, I’ve barely said anything; but like the parrot in the black story, I ‘think a damn lot.’"
My objection, incident more or less to every such scheme, was the risk of losing its general advantage by making it too specially dependent on individual characteristics; but there was much in favour of the present notion, and its plan had been modified so far, in the discussions that followed, as to involve less absolute personal identification with Dickens,—when discussion, project, everything was swept away by a larger scheme, in its extent and its danger more suitable to the wild and hazardous enterprises of that prodigious year (1845) of excitement and disaster. In this more tremendous adventure, already hinted at on a previous page, we all became involved; and the chirp of the Cricket, delayed in consequence until Christmas, was heard then in circumstances quite other than those that were first intended. The change he thus announced to me about half way through the summer, in the same[204] letter which told me the success of d'Orsay's kind exertion to procure a fresh engagement for his courier Roche.[106] "What do you think of a notion that has occurred to me in connection with our abandoned little weekly? It would be a delicate and beautiful fancy for a Christmas book, making the Cricket a little household god—silent in the wrong and sorrow of the tale, and loud again when all went well and happy." The reader will not need to be told that thus originated the story of the Cricket on the Hearth, a Fairy Tale of Home, which had a great popularity in the Christmas days of 1845. Its sale at the outset doubled that of both its predecessors.
My objection, which applied to pretty much every similar plan, was the risk of losing its overall benefits by making it too tied to individual traits. However, there were many good points about the current idea, and its approach had been adjusted enough during the following discussions to involve less direct personal connection to Dickens—until discussion, projects, and everything else were overshadowed by a bigger plan, one that, with its scale and risks, was more fitting for the wild and unpredictable events of that extraordinary year (1845) filled with excitement and chaos. In this more intense adventure, which I had already mentioned on a previous page, we all got involved; and the sound of the Cricket, delayed until Christmas as a result, was experienced under circumstances very different from what we originally intended. He shared this change with me about halfway through the summer, in the same[204] letter that informed me of the success of d'Orsay's kind efforts to secure a new contract for his courier Roche.[106] "What do you think of an idea I've had related to our abandoned little weekly? It would be a lovely and charming concept for a Christmas book, making the Cricket a little household god—silent during the wrong and sorrow of the story, and loud again when everything went well and happy." The reader doesn't need to be told that this is how the story of the Cricket on the Hearth, a Fairy Tale of Home, originated, which became very popular during the Christmas season of 1845. Its initial sales doubled those of both its predecessors.
But as yet the larger adventure has not made itself known, and the interval was occupied with the private play of which the notion had been started between us at his visit in December, and which cannot now be better introduced than by a passage of autobiography. This belongs to his early life, but I overlooked it when[205] engaged on that portion of the memoir; and the accident gives it now a more appropriate place. For, though the facts related belong to the interval described in the chapter on his school-days and start in life, when he had to pass nearly two years as a reporter for one of the offices in Doctors' Commons, the influences and character it illustrates had their strongest expression at this later time. I had asked him, after his return to Genoa, whether he continued to think that we should have the play; and this was his reply. It will startle and interest the reader, and I must confess that it took myself by surprise; for I did not thus early know the story of his boyish years, and I thought it strange that he could have concealed from me so much.
But so far, the bigger adventure hasn’t revealed itself, and the time was filled with the personal story that we had begun discussing during his visit in December, which I can now introduce better through a bit of autobiography. This part belongs to his early life, but I missed it when[205] working on that section of the memoir, and now it fits more appropriately. Although the events described occurred during the time covered in the chapter about his school days and early career, when he spent almost two years as a reporter for one of the offices in Doctors' Commons, the influences and character it shows were most strongly expressed during this later period. After he returned to Genoa, I asked him if he still thought we should have the play; this was his response. It will surprise and engage the reader, and I must admit it caught me off guard, as I didn’t know the story of his younger years at that point, and I found it odd that he had kept so much hidden from me.
"Are we to have that play??? Have I spoken of it, ever since I came home from London, as a settled thing! I do not know if I have ever told you seriously, but I have often thought, that I should certainly have been as successful on the boards as I have been between them. I assure you, when I was on the stage at Montreal (not having played for years) I was as much astonished at the reality and ease, to myself, of what I did as if I had been another man. See how oddly things come about! When I was about twenty, and knew three or four successive years of Mathews's At Homes from sitting in the pit to hear them, I wrote to Bartley who was stage manager at Covent-garden, and told him how young I was, and exactly what I thought I could do; and that I believed I had a strong perception of character and oddity, and a natural power of reproducing in my own person what I observed in others. There must have been something[206] in the letter that struck the authorities, for Bartley wrote to me, almost immediately, to say that they were busy getting up the Hunchback (so they were!) but that they would communicate with me again, in a fortnight. Punctual to the time, another letter came: with an appointment to do anything of Mathews's I pleased, before him and Charles Kemble, on a certain day at the theatre. My sister Fanny was in the secret, and was to go with me to play the songs. I was laid up, when the day came, with a terrible bad cold and an inflammation of the face; the beginning, by the bye, of that annoyance in one ear to which I am subject at this day. I wrote to say so, and added that I would resume my application next season. I made a great splash in the gallery soon afterwards; the Chronicle opened to me; I had a distinction in the little world of the newspaper, which made me like it; began to write; didn't want money; had never thought of the stage, but as a means of getting it; gradually left off turning my thoughts that way; and never resumed the idea. I never told you this, did I? See how near I may have been, to another sort of life.
Are we going to have that play??? I've mentioned it ever since I got back from London like it was a done deal! I’m not sure if I’ve ever told you this seriously, but I’ve often thought that I would’ve been just as successful on stage as I’ve been off it. I swear, when I was performing in Montreal (having not acted in years), I was just as surprised by how real and easy it felt, as if I were someone else. Isn’t it strange how things turn out? When I was about twenty, after experiencing Mathews's At Homes for three or four years from the audience, I wrote to Bartley, the stage manager at Covent Garden, telling him how young I was and exactly what I believed I could do. I mentioned that I thought I had a strong sense of character and a knack for mimicking what I observed in others. There must have been something in that letter that caught their attention because Bartley wrote back almost immediately, saying they were busy preparing the Hunchback (which they definitely were!) but that they’d get back to me in a fortnight. True to his word, I received another letter on time, inviting me to perform any of Mathews's pieces I wanted, in front of him and Charles Kemble, on a certain day at the theater. My sister Fanny was in on the secret and was going to accompany me to sing the songs. However, on the day of the performance, I was stuck in bed with a terrible cold and facial inflammation; by the way, that was the start of my ongoing ear issue. I wrote to let them know and added that I would try again next season. Shortly after that, I made a big impression in the gallery; the Chronicle opened up to me, and I gained a bit of recognition in the small newspaper world, which made me enjoy it. I began to write, didn’t need money; I never thought about the stage except as a way to earn it; slowly, I stopped focusing on acting and never thought about it again. I don’t think I’ve ever told you this, have I? Just think how close I could have been to a totally different life.
"This was at the time when I was at Doctors' Commons as a shorthand writer for the proctors. And I recollect I wrote the letter from a little office I had there, where the answer came also. It wasn't a very good living (though not a very bad one), and was wearily uncertain; which made me think of the Theatre in quite a business-like way. I went to some theatre every night, with a very few exceptions, for at least three years: really studying the bills first, and going to where there was the best acting: and always[207] to see Mathews whenever he played. I practised immensely (even such things as walking in and out, and sitting down in a chair): often four, five, six hours a day: shut up in my own room, or walking about in the fields. I prescribed to myself, too, a sort of Hamiltonian system for learning parts; and learnt a great number. I haven't even lost the habit now, for I knew my Canadian parts immediately, though they were new to me. I must have done a good deal: for, just as Macready found me out, they used to challenge me at Braham's: and Yates, who was knowing enough in those things, wasn't to be parried at all. It was just the same, that day at Keeley's, when they were getting up the Chuzzlewit last June.
"This was when I was at Doctors' Commons working as a shorthand writer for the proctors. I remember writing the letter from a small office I had there, where the answer also came. It wasn't a great living (though not a bad one), and it was frustratingly uncertain; which made me think of the Theatre in a very practical way. I went to some theatre almost every night, with very few exceptions, for at least three years: really studying the playbills first, and going to where the acting was the best: and always to see Mathews whenever he performed. I practiced a lot (even things like walking in and out, and sitting down in a chair): often four, five, or six hours a day: either locked in my room or walking around in the fields. I also set myself a sort of Hamiltonian method for learning lines; and I memorized a great number. I haven't even lost the habit now, because I learned my Canadian parts right away, even though they were new to me. I must have accomplished quite a bit: just as Macready recognized my talent, they would challenge me at Braham's: and Yates, who was savvy about these things, was not someone you could easily dismiss. It was the same that day at Keeley's, when they were putting together the Chuzzlewit last June."
"If you think Macready would be interested in this Strange news from the South, tell it him. Fancy Bartley or Charles Kemble now! And how little they suspect me!" In the later letter from Lucerne written as he was travelling home, he adds: "Did I ever tell you the details of my theatrical idea, before? Strange, that I should have quite forgotten it. I had an odd fancy, when I was reading the unfortunate little farce at Covent-garden, that Bartley looked as if some struggling recollection and connection were stirring up within him—but it may only have been his doubts of that humorous composition." The last allusion is to the farce of the Lamplighter which he read in the Covent-garden green-room, and to which former allusion was made in speaking of his wish to give help to Macready's managerial enterprise.
"If you think Macready would be interested in this strange news from the South, let him know. Can you imagine Bartley or Charles Kemble now? And how little they suspect me!" In the later letter from Lucerne, written as he was traveling home, he adds: "Did I ever tell you the details of my theatrical idea before? It's strange that I would completely forget it. I had a weird feeling when I was reading that unfortunate little farce at Covent Garden that Bartley looked like some struggling memory and connection were stirring within him—but it might just have been his doubts about that funny piece." The last reference is to the farce of the Lamplighter that he read in the Covent Garden green room, and to which a previous mention was made regarding his desire to support Macready's managerial venture.
What Might have Been is a history of too little profit to be worth anybody's writing, and here there is no[208] call even to regret how great an actor was in Dickens lost. He took to a higher calling, but it included the lower. There was no character created by him into which life and reality were not thrown with such vividness, that the thing written did not seem to his readers the thing actually done, whether the form of disguise put on by the enchanter was Mrs. Gamp, Tom Pinch, Mr. Squeers, or Fagin the Jew. He had the power of projecting himself into shapes and suggestions of his fancy which is one of the marvels of creative imagination, and what he desired to express he became. The assumptions of the theatre have the same method at a lower pitch, depending greatly on personal accident; but the accident as much as the genius favoured Dickens, and another man's conception underwent in his acting the process which in writing he applied to his own. Into both he flung himself with the passionate fullness of his nature; and though the theatre had limits for him that may be named hereafter, and he was always greater in quickness of assumption than in steadiness of delineation, there was no limit to his delight and enjoyment in the adventures of our theatrical holiday.
What Might Have Been is a story about too little profit to be worth anyone's time to write, and there's no[208] reason to even regret how great an actor Dickens could have been. He pursued a higher purpose, but it also included the lower aspects. Every character he created was infused with such vividness of life and reality that what he wrote felt like it actually happened to his readers, whether the character was Mrs. Gamp, Tom Pinch, Mr. Squeers, or Fagin the Jew. He had this incredible ability to project himself into the various shapes and ideas of his imagination, which is one of the wonders of creative talent, and he became whatever he aimed to express. The conventions of the theater operate similarly, but at a lesser intensity, relying heavily on personal luck; yet, both luck and genius were on Dickens' side, and another person's ideas transformed in his performance just as they did in his writing. He poured himself into both with passionate intensity; and although there were limits in theater that can be discussed later, and he was often quicker at assuming roles than at developing them with consistency, there was no limit to his joy and excitement in the adventures of our theatrical escapades.
In less than three weeks after his return we had selected our play, cast our parts, and all but engaged our theatre; as I find by a note from my friend of the 22nd of July, in which the good natured laugh can give now no offence, since all who might have objected to it have long gone from us. Fanny Kelly, the friend of Charles Lamb, and a genuine successor to the old school of actresses in which the Mrs. Orgers and Miss Popes were bred, was not more delightful on the stage[209] than impracticable when off, and the little theatre in Dean-street which the Duke of Devonshire's munificence had enabled her to build, and which with any ordinary good sense might handsomely have realized both its uses, as a private school for young actresses and a place of public amusement, was made useless for both by her mere whims and fancies. "Heavens! Such a scene as I have had with Miss Kelly here, this morning! She wanted us put off until the theatre should be cleaned and brushed up a bit, and she would and she would not, for she is eager to have us and alarmed when she thinks of us. By the foot of Pharaoh, it was a great scene! Especially when she choked, and had the glass of water brought. She exaggerates the importance of our occupation, dreads the least prejudice against the establishment in the minds of any of our company, says the place already has quite ruined her, and with tears in her eyes protests that any jokes at her additional expense in print would drive her mad. By the body of Cæsar, the scene was incredible! It's like a preposterous dream." Something of our play is disclosed by the oaths à la Bobadil, and of our actors by "the jokes" poor Miss Kelly was afraid of. We had chosen Every Man in his Humour, with special regard to the singleness and individuality of the "humours" portrayed in it; and our company included the leaders of a journal then in its earliest years, but already not more renowned as the most successful joker of jokes yet known in England, than famous for that exclusive use of its laughter and satire for objects the highest or most harmless which makes it still so enjoyable a companion to mirth-loving right-minded[210] men. Maclise took earnest part with us, and was to have acted, but fell away on the eve of the rehearsals; and Stanfield, who went so far as to rehearse Downright twice, then took fright and also ran away:[107] but Jerrold, who played Master Stephen, brought with him Lemon, who took Brainworm; Leech, to whom Master Matthew was given; A'Beckett, who had condescended to the small part of William; and Mr. Leigh, who had Oliver Cob. I played Kitely, and Bobadil fell to Dickens, who took upon him the redoubtable Captain long before he stood in his dress at the footlights; humouring the completeness of his assumption by talking and writing Bobadil, till the dullest of our party were touched and stirred to something of his own heartiness of enjoyment. One or two hints of these have been given, and I will only add to them his refusal of my wish that he should go and see some special performance of the Gamester. "Man of the House. Gamester! By the foot of Pharaoh, I will not see the Gamester. Man shall not force, nor horses drag, this poor gentleman-like carcass into the presence of the Gamester. I have said it. . . . The player Mac hath bidden me to eat and likewise[211] drink with him, thyself, and short-necked Fox to-night—An' I go not, I am a hog, and not a soldier. But an' thou goest not—Beware citizen! Look to it. . . . Thine as thou meritest. Bobadil (Captain). Unto Master Kitely. These."
In less than three weeks after his return, we had picked our play, assigned our roles, and were almost ready to book our theater; I found a note from my friend dated July 22nd, where the lightheartedness can now cause no offense since all who might have objected are long gone. Fanny Kelly, a friend of Charles Lamb and a true representative of the old school of actresses like Mrs. Orgers and Miss Popes, was just as delightful on stage as she was difficult off it. The little theater in Dean Street, which the Duke of Devonshire's generosity allowed her to build, could have served well both as a private school for young actresses and as a venue for public entertainment, but was rendered useless for both by her whims. “Goodness! What a scene I've had with Miss Kelly here this morning! She wanted us to postpone until the theater was cleaned and tidied up a bit. She was eager to have us, yet scared when she thought of us. By the foot of Pharaoh, it was quite a scene! Especially when she choked and had a glass of water brought to her. She exaggerates the significance of our work, fears the slightest negativity from anyone in our group, claims the place has nearly ruined her, and with tears in her eyes protests that any jokes at her expense in print would drive her mad. By the body of Caesar, the scene was unbelievable! It felt like an absurd dream.” Some hints about our play are revealed through our swearing à la Bobadil, and about our actors through “the jokes” that poor Miss Kelly feared. We had chosen Every Man in His Humor, particularly considering the distinctiveness of the “humours” presented; our group included leaders of a journal that was in its early years but was already celebrated for being the most successful source of humor in England, and notorious for using its laughter and satire for the loftiest or most innocent causes, making it still a delightful companion for fun-loving, good-hearted people. Maclise was seriously involved with us and was supposed to perform, but backed out just before rehearsals; and Stanfield, who rehearsed Downright twice, also got scared and dropped out: [107] but Jerrold, who played Master Stephen, brought Lemon, who took on Brainworm; Leech, who was given Master Matthew; A'Beckett, who agreed to the small role of William; and Mr. Leigh, who played Oliver Cob. I took on the role of Kitely, and Bobadil was assigned to Dickens, who embraced the challenging Captain long before he stood in costume at the footlights, fully immersing himself in the character by speaking and writing as Bobadil until even the dullest among us were stirred to some of his own exuberance. I've shared a couple of these anecdotes and will just add that he declined my request for him to go see a specific performance of the Gamester. "Man of the House. Gamester! By the foot of Pharaoh, I will not see the Gamester. No man shall force, nor horse drag, this poor gentleman-like carcass into the presence of the Gamester. I have said it. . . . The player Mac has invited me to eat and also drink with him, you, and short-necked Fox tonight—If I don’t go, I’m a pig, not a soldier. But if you don’t go—Beware citizen! Watch out. . . . Yours as you deserve. Bobadil (Captain). To Master Kitely. These."
The play was played on the 21st of September with a success that out-ran the wildest expectation; and turned our little enterprise into one of the small sensations of the day. The applause of the theatre found so loud an echo in the press, that for the time nothing else was talked about in private circles; and after a week or two we had to yield (we did not find it difficult) to a pressure of demand for more public performance in a larger theatre, by which a useful charity received important help, and its committee showed their gratitude by an entertainment to us at the Clarendon, a month or two later, when Lord Lansdowne took the chair. There was also another performance by us at the same theatre, before the close of the year, of a play by Beaumont and Fletcher. I may not farther indicate the enjoyments that attended the success, and gave always to the first of our series of performances a pre-eminently pleasant place in memory.
The play was performed on September 21st with a success that exceeded our wildest expectations and turned our small project into one of the big events of the day. The theater's applause echoed so loudly in the press that, for a while, it was the only thing everyone was talking about in private circles. After a week or two, we had to give in (which wasn’t hard to do) to the overwhelming demand for more public performances in a larger theater, which provided significant support for a worthwhile charity. The charity’s committee showed their appreciation by hosting an event for us at the Clarendon a month or two later, where Lord Lansdowne was the host. We also had another performance at the same theater before the end of the year, featuring a play by Beaumont and Fletcher. I won't go into further detail about the joys that came with our success, which always gave the first of our series of performances a special, memorable place in my mind.
Of the thing itself, however, it is necessary to be said that a modicum of merit goes a long way in all such matters, and it would not be safe now to assume that ours was much above the average of amateur attempts in general. Lemon certainly had most of the stuff, conventional as well as otherwise, of a regular actor in him, but this was not of a high kind; and though Dickens had the title to be called a born comedian, the turn for it being in his very nature, his[212] strength was rather in the vividness and variety of his assumptions, than in the completeness, finish, or ideality he could give to any part of them. It is expressed exactly by what he says of his youthful preference for the representations of the elder Mathews. At the same time this was in itself so thoroughly genuine and enjoyable, and had in it such quickness and keenness of insight, that of its kind it was unrivalled; and it enabled him to present in Bobadil, after a richly coloured picture of bombastical extravagance and comic exaltation in the earlier scenes, a contrast in the later of tragical humility and abasement, that had a wonderful effect. But greatly as his acting contributed to the success of the night, this was nothing to the service he had rendered as manager. It would be difficult to describe it. He was the life and soul of the entire affair. I never seemed till then to have known his business capabilities. He took everything on himself, and did the whole of it without an effort. He was stage-director, very often stage-carpenter, scene-arranger, property-man, prompter, and band-master. Without offending any one he kept every one in order. For all he had useful suggestions, and the dullest of clays under his potter's hand were transformed into little bits of porcelain. He adjusted scenes, assisted carpenters, invented costumes, devised playbills, wrote out calls, and enforced as well as exhibited in his proper person everything of which he urged the necessity on others. Such a chaos of dirt, confusion, and noise, as the little theatre was the day we entered it, and such a cosmos as he made it of cleanliness, order, and silence, before the rehearsals were over! There were only two things[213] left as we found them, bits of humanity both, understood from the first as among the fixtures of the place: a Man in a Straw Hat, tall, and very fitful in his exits and entrances, of whom we never could pierce the mystery, whether he was on guard or in possession, or what he was; and a solitary little girl, who flitted about so silently among our actors and actresses that she might have been deaf and dumb but for sudden small shrieks and starts elicited by the wonders going on, which obtained for her the name of Fireworks. There is such humorous allusion to both in a letter of Dickens's of a year's later date, on the occasion of the straw-hatted mystery revealing itself as a gentleman in training for the tragic stage, that it may pleasantly close for the present our private theatricals.
Of the thing itself, however, it's necessary to say that a little bit of talent goes a long way in matters like this, and it wouldn't be wise to think that our efforts were much better than the average amateur attempts. Lemon definitely had a lot of the conventional and non-conventional traits of a real actor, but they weren't of a high quality. While Dickens had the right to be called a born comedian, with a natural flair for it, his strength lay more in the vividness and variety of his portrayals than in the completeness, polish, or ideal quality he could bring to any of them. This is perfectly captured by what he says about his youthful preference for the performances of the elder Mathews. At the same time, this was so genuine and enjoyable in itself, and had such sharp insight, that, for its kind, it was unmatched. It allowed him to present in Bobadil, after a vibrant display of bombastic extravagance and comic elevation in the earlier scenes, a contrast in the later parts of tragic humility and downfall that had a remarkable impact. But as much as his acting contributed to the success of the night, it paled in comparison to the role he played as manager. It would be hard to describe. He was the life and soul of the whole event. I never realized until then how capable he was in business. He took everything upon himself, managing it all effortlessly. He acted as stage director, often as stage carpenter, scene arranger, props manager, prompter, and band leader. He kept everyone organized without upsetting anyone. He had great suggestions, and even the dullest days under his guidance turned into little masterpieces. He arranged scenes, assisted carpenters, created costumes, designed playbills, wrote out cues, and enforced everything he urged others to do, while also demonstrating it himself. The chaos of dirt, confusion, and noise in the little theater when we arrived was transformed into a space of cleanliness, order, and silence before rehearsals were done! The only two things that remained as we found them were both bits of humanity, clearly fixtures of the place: a tall man in a straw hat, who was very unpredictable in his entrances and exits, and about whom we could never figure out whether he was on guard or just there; and a solitary little girl, who moved about so quietly among our actors and actresses that she could have been deaf and mute, except for the occasional small screams and jumps that she made in reaction to the wonders happening around her, which earned her the nickname Fireworks. There’s a humorous reference to both in a letter from Dickens written a year later, when the mystery of the man in the straw hat was revealed to be a gentleman training for the tragic stage, which serves as a nice conclusion to our private theatricals for now.
"Our straw-hatted friend from Miss Kelly's! Oh my stars! To think of him, all that time—Macbeth in disguise; Richard the Third grown straight; Hamlet as he appeared on his seavoyage to England. What an artful villain he must be, never to have made any sign of the melodrama that was in him! What a wicked-minded and remorseless Iago to have seen you doing Kitely night after night! raging to murder you and seize the part! Oh fancy Miss Kelly 'getting him up' in Macbeth. Good Heaven! what a mass of absurdity must be shut up sometimes within the walls of that small theatre in Dean-street! Fireworks will come out shortly, depend upon it, in the dumb line; and will relate her history in profoundly unintelligible motions that will be translated into long and complicated descriptions by a grey-headed father, and a red-wigged countryman, his son. You remember the dumb[214] dodge of relating an escape from captivity? Clasping the left wrist with the right hand, and the right wrist with the left hand—alternately (to express chains)—and then going round and round the stage very fast, and coming hand over hand down an imaginary cord; at the end of which there is one stroke on the drum, and a kneeling to the chandelier? If Fireworks can't do that—and won't somewhere—I'm a Dutchman."
"Our friend in a straw hat from Miss Kelly's! Oh wow! To think of him, all that time—Macbeth in disguise; Richard the Third standing tall; Hamlet as he looked on his sea voyage to England. What a crafty villain he must be, never showing any hint of the drama within him! What a wickedly clever and heartless Iago to have seen you doing Kitely night after night! Furious to kill you and take the role! Oh, just imagine Miss Kelly 'getting him up' as Macbeth. Good heavens! What a bundle of ridiculousness must be contained sometimes within the walls of that small theater on Dean Street! Fireworks will come out soon, you can count on it, in the silent act; and will depict her story in deeply confusing motions that will be interpreted into long and complicated descriptions by a gray-haired father and a red-wigged countryman, his son. Remember the quiet[214] trick of showing an escape from captivity? Clasping the left wrist with the right hand, and the right wrist with the left hand—alternating (to represent chains)—and then spinning around the stage really fast, and coming hand over hand down an imaginary rope; at the end of which there is one drum beat, followed by a kneel to the chandelier? If Fireworks can’t do that—and doesn’t somewhere—I’m a Dutchman."
Graver things now claim a notice which need not be proportioned to their gravity, because, though they had an immediate effect on Dickens's fortunes, they do not otherwise form part of his story. But first let me say, he was at Broadstairs for three weeks in the autumn;[108] we had the private play on his return; and[215] a month later, on the 28th of October, a sixth child and fourth son, named Alfred Tennyson after his godfathers d'Orsay and Tennyson, was born in Devonshire-terrace. A death in the family followed, the older and more gifted of his ravens having indulged the same illicit taste for putty and paint which had been fatal to his predecessor. Voracity killed him, as it killed Scott's. He died unexpectedly before the kitchen-fire. "He kept his eye to the last upon the meat as it roasted, and suddenly turned over on his back with a sepulchral cry of Cuckoo!" The letter which told me this (31st of October) announced to me also that he was at a dead lock in his Christmas story: "Sick, bothered and depressed. Visions of Brighton come upon me; and I have a great mind to go there to finish my second part, or to Hampstead. I have a desperate thought of Jack Straw's. I never was in such bad writing cue as I am this week, in all my life." The reason was not far to seek. In the preparation for the proposed new Daily Paper to which reference has been made, he was now actively assisting, and had all but consented to the publication of his name.
More serious matters now demand attention that shouldn't necessarily match their weight because, while they had a direct impact on Dickens's fortunes, they don't actually relate to his story. But first, let me mention that he spent three weeks in Broadstairs during the autumn; [108] we held a private play upon his return; and [215] a month later, on October 28th, a sixth child and fourth son, named Alfred Tennyson after his godfathers d'Orsay and Tennyson, was born at Devonshire Terrace. A family death followed, as the older and more talented of his ravens had given in to the same dangerous cravings for putty and paint that had harmed his predecessor. Gluttony was his demise, just like it was for Scott's. He passed away unexpectedly in front of the kitchen fire. "He kept his eye on the meat as it roasted until he suddenly flipped over on his back with a haunting cry of Cuckoo!" The letter I received about this (October 31st) also informed me that he was stuck on his Christmas story: "Sick, bothered, and depressed. I keep thinking about Brighton, and I'm strongly considering going there to finish my second part, or to Hampstead. I'm also seriously contemplating Jack Straw's. I've never experienced such poor writing conditions as I have this week in my entire life." The reason for this wasn't hard to identify. In preparation for the new Daily Paper that had been mentioned, he was actively involved and had almost agreed to allow his name to be published.
I entertained at this time, for more than one powerful reason, the greatest misgiving of his intended share in the adventure. It was not fully revealed until later[216] on what difficult terms, physical as well as mental, Dickens held the tenure of his imaginative life; but already I knew enough to doubt the wisdom of what he was at present undertaking. In all intellectual labour, his will prevailed so strongly when he fixed it on any object of desire, that what else its attainment might exact was never duly measured; and this led to frequent strain and unconscious waste of what no man could less afford to spare. To the world gladdened by his work, its production might always have seemed quite as easy as its enjoyment; but it may be doubted if ever any man's mental effort cost him more. His habits were robust, but not his health; that secret had been disclosed to me before he went to America; and to the last he refused steadily to admit the enormous price he had paid for his triumphs and successes. The morning after his last note I heard again. "I have been so very unwell this morning, with giddiness, and headache, and botheration of one sort or other, that I didn't get up till noon: and, shunning Fleet-street" (the office of the proposed new paper), "am now going for a country walk, in the course of which you will find me, if you feel disposed to come away in the carriage that goes to you with this. It is to call for a pull of the first part of the Cricket, and will bring you, if you like, by way of Hampstead to me, and subsequently to dinner. There is much I should like to discuss, if you can manage it. It's the loss of my walks, I suppose; but I am as giddy as if I were drunk, and can hardly see." I gave far from sufficient importance at the time to the frequency of complaints of this kind, or to the recurrence, at almost regular periods after the year following the[217] present, of those spasms in the side of which he has recorded an instance in the recollections of his childhood, and of which he had an attack in Genoa; but though not conscious of it to its full extent, this consideration was among those that influenced me in a determination to endeavour to turn him from what could not but be regarded as full of peril. His health, however, had no real prominence in my letter; and it is strange now to observe that it appears as an argument in his reply. I had simply put before him, in the strongest form, all the considerations drawn from his genius and fame that should deter him from the labour and responsibility of a daily paper, not less than from the party and political involvements incident to it; and here was the material part of the answer made. "Many thanks for your affectionate letter, which is full of generous truth. These considerations weigh with me, heavily: but I think I descry in these times, greater stimulants to such an effort; greater chance of some fair recognition of it; greater means of persevering in it, or retiring from it unscratched by any weapon one should care for; than at any other period. And most of all I have, sometimes, that possibility of failing health or fading popularity before me, which beckons me to such a venture when it comes within my reach. At the worst, I have written to little purpose, if I cannot write myself right in people's minds, in such a case as this."
I had serious doubts about his planned involvement in the project for more than one major reason. It wasn't completely clear until later[216] how difficult it was for Dickens to manage both the physical and mental demands of his creative life. Even then, I knew enough to question whether what he was undertaking was wise. In all his intellectual work, when he focused his will on something he desired, he never adequately measured what it would take to achieve it. This often led to unnecessary strain and a waste of energy that he could ill afford. To the world that enjoyed his work, producing it likely seemed as easy as enjoying it; but few could understand just how costly his mental efforts truly were. His habits were vigorous, but his health was not; I had learned that before he left for America. All the way to the end, he steadfastly refused to acknowledge the heavy toll he had paid for his achievements. The morning after his last note, I heard from him again. "I've been feeling really unwell this morning, with dizziness, headaches, and all sorts of annoying issues, so I didn't get up until noon. To avoid Fleet Street" (the office of the proposed new paper), "I'm going for a country walk, during which you can find me if you want to come in the carriage that arrives for you with this. It's meant to pick up the first part of the Cricket and can bring you, if you want, by way of Hampstead to me, and then to dinner. There’s a lot I’d like to discuss if you can make it. I guess it’s the loss of my walks that does it; I feel as dizzy as if I were drunk, and can hardly see." At the time, I didn't think much of the frequent complaints he had or the recurring spasms he had experienced regularly after the year following the[217] present, including one he had in Genoa. While I didn’t fully grasp the significance, this concern played a role in my decision to try to steer him away from what seemed undeniably risky. However, his health didn’t really come into play in my letter; it’s odd now to see it mentioned in his response. I had simply laid out, as forcefully as possible, all the reasons related to his genius and fame that should discourage him from taking on the work and responsibilities of a daily paper, along with the political entanglements that would come with it; and this was the main part of his reply. "Thank you very much for your heartfelt letter, which contains so much generous truth. These considerations weigh on me, heavily: but I see, in these times, greater motivations for such an effort; a better chance of receiving fair recognition for it; better means of pushing through or walking away from it without getting hurt than at any other time. Most importantly, I sometimes consider the possibility of declining health or waning popularity, which draws me towards this kind of venture when it’s within reach. At the very least, I would feel I've written to little purpose if I can't write myself right in people's minds in a situation like this."
And so it went on: but it does not fall within my plan to describe more than the issue, which was to be accounted so far at least fortunate that it established a journal which has advocated steadily improvements in the condition of all classes, rich as well as poor, and[218] has been able, during late momentous occurrences, to give wider scope to its influence by its enterprise and liberality. To that result, the great writer whose name gave its earliest attraction to the Daily News was not enabled to contribute much; but from him it certainly received the first impress of the opinions it has since consistently maintained. Its prospectus is before me in his handwriting, but it bears upon itself sufficiently the character of his hand and mind. The paper would be kept free, it said, from personal influence or party bias; and would be devoted to the advocacy of all rational and honest means by which wrong might be redressed, just rights maintained, and the happiness and welfare of society promoted.
And so it continued: but I won’t describe more than the outcome, which was at least fortunate enough to create a publication that has consistently supported improvements for all classes, both rich and poor, and[218] has been able, during recent significant events, to expand its influence through its resourcefulness and generosity. The great writer whose name initially attracted people to the Daily News wasn't able to contribute much; however, from him, the paper certainly received the first stamp of the views it has since consistently upheld. I have its prospectus in his handwriting, and it clearly reflects his style and thoughts. The publication stated it would remain free from personal influence or party bias and would focus on promoting all rational and honest methods to correct wrongs, uphold just rights, and advance the happiness and welfare of society.
The day for the appearance of its first number was that which was to follow Peel's speech for the repeal of the corn laws; but, brief as my allusions to the subject are, the remark should be made that even before this day came there were interruptions to the work of preparation, at one time very grave, which threw such "changes of vexation" on Dickens's personal relations to the venture as went far to destroy both his faith and his pleasure in it. No opinion need be offered as to where most of the blame lay, and it would be useless now to apportion the share that might possibly have belonged to himself; but, owing to this cause, his editorial work began with such diminished ardour that its brief continuance could not but be looked for. A little note written "before going home" at six o'clock in the morning of Wednesday the 21st of January 1846, to tell me they had "been at press three quarters of an hour, and were out before the Times," marks the beginning;[219] and a note written in the night of Monday the 9th of February, "tired to death and quite worn out," to say that he had just resigned his editorial functions, describes the end. I had not been unprepared. A week before (Friday 30th of January) he had written: "I want a long talk with you. I was obliged to come down here in a hurry to give out a travelling letter I meant to have given out last night, and could not call upon you. Will you dine with us to-morrow at six sharp? I have been revolving plans in my mind this morning for quitting the paper and going abroad again to write a new book in shilling numbers. Shall we go to Rochester to-morrow week (my birthday) if the weather be, as it surely must be, better?" To Rochester accordingly we had gone, he and Mrs. Dickens and her sister, with Maclise and Jerrold and myself; going over the old Castle, Watts's Charity, and Chatham fortifications on the Saturday, passing Sunday in Cobham church and Cobham park; having our quarters both days at the Bull inn made famous in Pickwick; and thus, by indulgence of the desire which was always strangely urgent in him, associating his new resolve in life with those earliest scenes of his youthful time. On one point our feeling had been in thorough agreement. If long continuance with the paper was not likely, the earliest possible departure from it was desirable. But as the letters descriptive of his Italian travel (turned afterwards into Pictures from Italy) had begun with its first number, his name could not at once be withdrawn; and for the time during which they were still to appear, he consented to contribute other occasional letters on important social questions. Public executions and[220] Ragged schools were among the subjects chosen by him, and all were handled with conspicuous ability. But the interval they covered was a short one.
The day when the first issue was set to come out was right after Peel's speech about repealing the corn laws. Even though my mentions of this topic are brief, it’s worth noting that before this day arrived, there were significant interruptions during the preparation phase that caused a lot of frustration in Dickens's personal connection to the project, which nearly undermined both his confidence and enjoyment in it. There's no need to lay blame, and it would be pointless now to assign any responsibility that might have been his; however, because of this, he started his editorial work with much less enthusiasm, making its short duration predictable. A little note written "before going home" at six in the morning on Wednesday, January 21, 1846, stating they had "been at press for three quarters of an hour, and were out before the Times," marks the beginning;[219] and a note written late on Monday, February 9, saying he was "tired to death and quite worn out," indicating he had just quit his editorial duties, signifies the end. I wasn't entirely unprepared. A week earlier (Friday, January 30), he had written: "I need to talk with you. I had to hurry down here to issue a travel letter I meant to give out last night, and I couldn't see you. Will you have dinner with us tomorrow at six sharp? This morning, I’ve been thinking about plans to leave the paper and go abroad again to write a new book in shilling numbers. Shall we go to Rochester next week on my birthday if the weather is, as it surely must be, nicer?" So, we went to Rochester with him, Mrs. Dickens, her sister, Maclise, Jerrold, and myself; exploring the old Castle, Watts's Charity, and Chatham fortifications on Saturday, and spending Sunday in Cobham church and park; staying at the Bull inn, made famous in Pickwick; thus, by indulging a desire that was always strangely strong in him, linking his new life resolution to the earliest scenes of his youth. On one point, we were completely in agreement. If a long stay with the paper didn’t seem likely, leaving it as soon as possible was preferable. However, since the letters describing his travels in Italy (which later became Pictures from Italy) began with the first issue, he couldn't withdraw his name immediately; and for the time they still needed to appear, he agreed to contribute other occasional letters on significant social issues. Public executions and Ragged schools were among the topics he chose, all handled with remarkable skill. But the time they covered was brief.
To the supreme control which he had quitted, I succeeded, retaining it very reluctantly for the greater part of that weary, anxious, laborious year; but in little more than four months from the day the paper started, the whole of Dickens's connection with the Daily News, even that of contributing letters with his signature, had ceased. As he said in the preface to the republished Pictures, it was a mistake to have disturbed the old relations between himself and his readers, in so departing from his old pursuits. It had however been "a brief mistake;" the departure had been only "for a moment;" and now those pursuits were "joyfully" to be resumed in Switzerland. Upon the latter point we had much discussion; but he was bent on again removing himself from London, and his glimpse of the Swiss mountains on his coming from Italy had given him a passion to visit them again. "I don't think," he wrote to me, "I could shut out the paper sufficiently, here, to write well. No . . . I will write my book in Lausanne and in Genoa, and forget everything else if I can; and by living in Switzerland for the summer, and in Italy or France for the winter, I shall be saving money while I write." So therefore it was finally determined.
To the main control he had left, I took over, holding onto it very reluctantly for most of that exhausting, anxious, laborious year; but in just over four months from when the paper launched, all of Dickens's involvement with the Daily News, even that of sending letters with his name, had ended. As he mentioned in the preface to the republished Pictures, it was a mistake to have disrupted the old bond between himself and his readers by straying from his usual interests. However, it had been "a brief mistake;" the departure had only lasted "for a moment;" and now those interests were "joyfully" to be revisited in Switzerland. We had extensive discussions about this; but he was determined to leave London again, and his fleeting view of the Swiss mountains on his way back from Italy had ignited a desire to see them once more. "I don't think," he wrote to me, "I could shut out the paper enough, here, to write well. No . . . I will write my book in Lausanne and in Genoa, and forget everything else if I can; and by living in Switzerland during the summer and in Italy or France during the winter, I’ll save money while I write." So it was ultimately decided.
There is not much that calls for mention before he left. The first conceiving of a new book was always a restless time, and other subjects beside the characters that were growing in his mind would persistently intrude themselves into his night-wanderings. With some surprise I heard from him afterwards, for example, of a[221] communication opened with a leading member of the Government to ascertain what chances there might be for his appointment, upon due qualification, to the paid magistracy of London: the reply not giving him encouragement to entertain the notion farther. It was of course but an outbreak of momentary discontent; and if the answer had been as hopeful as for others' sake rather than his own one could have wished it to be, the result would have been the same. Just upon the eve of his departure, I may add, he took much interest in the establishment of the General Theatrical Fund, of which he remained a trustee until his death. It had originated in the fact that the Funds of the two large theatres, themselves then disused for theatrical performances, were no longer available for the ordinary members of the profession; and on the occasion of his presiding at its first dinner in April he said, very happily, that now the statue of Shakespeare outside the door of Drury-lane, as emphatically as his bust inside the church of Stratford-on-Avon, pointed out his grave. I am tempted also to mention as felicitous a word which I heard fall from him at one of the many private dinners that were got up in those days of parting to give him friendliest farewell. "Nothing is ever so good as it is thought," said Lord Melbourne. "And nothing so bad," interposed Dickens.
There isn’t much to mention before he left. The initial idea for a new book was always a restless time, and other topics besides the characters forming in his mind constantly interrupted his late-night thoughts. I was somewhat surprised to hear later from him about a[221] communication he had with a prominent member of the Government, trying to find out what his chances were for getting a paid magistrate position in London, given the right qualifications. The response didn’t encourage him to pursue that idea any further. It was just a momentary burst of discontent; even if the answer had been more hopeful, as one might wish for others rather than himself, the outcome would likely have been the same. Right before his departure, I should add, he was quite interested in establishing the General Theatrical Fund, which he remained a trustee of until his death. It had come about because the funds from the two large theaters, which were then no longer used for performances, were not available for the regular members of the profession. During his presidency at its first dinner in April, he cleverly remarked that now the statue of Shakespeare outside Drury Lane, just as much as his bust inside the church of Stratford-on-Avon, pointed out his grave. I’m also tempted to mention a clever remark I heard him make at one of the many private dinners organized as a friendly farewell for him: "Nothing is ever so good as it is thought," said Lord Melbourne. "And nothing is so bad," Dickens replied.
The last incidents were that he again obtained Roche for his travelling servant, and that he let his Devonshire-terrace house to Sir James Duke for twelve months, the entire proposed term of his absence. On the 30th of May they all dined with me, and on the following day left England.
The last events were that he once again arranged for Roche to be his traveling servant, and that he rented out his house on Devonshire Terrace to Sir James Duke for twelve months, which was the full duration of his trip. On May 30th, they all had dinner with me, and the next day they left England.
CHAPTER X.
A HOME IN SWITZERLAND.
1846.
Halting only at Ostend, Verviers, Coblentz, and Mannheim, they reached Strasburg on the seventh of June: the beauty of the weather[109] showing them the Rhine at its best. At Mayence there had come aboard their boat a German, who soon after accosted Mrs. Dickens on deck in excellent English: "Your countryman Mr. Dickens is travelling this way just now, our papers say. Do you know him, or have you passed him anywhere?" Explanations ensuing, it turned out, by one of the odd chances my friend thought himself always singled out for, that he had with him a letter of introduction to the brother of this gentleman; who then spoke to him of the popularity of his books in Germany, and of the many persons he had seen reading them in the steamboats[223] as he came along. Dickens remarking at this how great his own vexation was not to be able himself to speak a word of German, "Oh dear! that needn't trouble you," rejoined the other; "for even in so small a town as ours, where we are mostly primitive people and have few travellers, I could make a party of at least forty people who understand and speak English as well as I do, and of at least as many more who could manage to read you in the original." His town was Worms, which Dickens afterwards saw, " . . . a fine old place, though greatly shrunken and decayed in respect of its population; with a picturesque old cathedral standing on the brink of the Rhine, and some brave old churches shut up, and so hemmed in and overgrown with vineyards that they look as if they were turning into leaves and grapes."
Stopping only at Ostend, Verviers, Coblentz, and Mannheim, they arrived in Strasbourg on June 7th. The beautiful weather[109] showcased the Rhine at its finest. In Mayence, a German got on their boat and soon approached Mrs. Dickens on deck, speaking excellent English: "Your fellow countryman Mr. Dickens is traveling this way right now, or so our newspapers say. Do you know him, or have you seen him anywhere?" As they explained, it turned out—one of those quirky coincidences my friend always felt he was singled out for—that he had a letter of introduction to this gentleman’s brother. He then mentioned how popular Mr. Dickens' books were in Germany and how he had seen many people reading them on the steamboats[223] during his journey. Dickens expressed his frustration at not being able to speak any German himself. "Oh dear! That shouldn't bother you," replied the other. "Even in a small town like ours, where most of us are pretty traditional and we don’t have many travelers, I could gather at least forty people who understand and speak English as well as I do, and at least as many more who could read your work in the original." His town was Worms, which Dickens later visited. "…a lovely old place, although greatly reduced and run-down in terms of its population; with a picturesque old cathedral standing by the Rhine, and some impressive old churches closed off and so surrounded and overgrown with vineyards that they seem to be turning into leaves and grapes."
He had no other adventure on the Rhine. But, on the same steamer, a not unfamiliar bit of character greeted him in the well-known lineaments, moral and physical, of two travelling Englishmen who had got an immense barouche on board with them, and had no plan whatever of going anywhere in it. One of them wanted to have this barouche wheeled ashore at every little town and village they came to. The other was bent upon "seeing it out," as he said—meaning, Dickens supposed, the river; though neither of them seemed to have the slightest interest in it. "The locomotive one would have gone ashore without the carriage, and would have been delighted to get rid of it; but they had a joint courier, and neither of them would part with him for a moment; so they went growling and grumbling on together, and seemed to[224] have no satisfaction but in asking for impossible viands on board the boat, and having a grim delight in the steward's excuses."
He didn’t have any other adventures on the Rhine. But, on the same steamer, he ran into a familiar type of character in the well-known features, both moral and physical, of two traveling Englishmen who brought an enormous carriage on board with them but had no plans of actually going anywhere in it. One of them wanted to have this carriage unloaded at every little town and village they passed. The other was determined to “see it out,” as he put it—meaning, Dickens assumed, the river; though neither seemed to show the slightest interest in it. “The train guy would have gotten off without the carriage and would have been happy to see it go; but they had a shared courier, and neither would let him out of their sight for a second; so they continued on, grumbling and complaining, finding their only pleasure in asking for impossible dishes on the boat, and taking grim satisfaction in the steward's excuses.”
From Strasburg they went by rail on the 8th to Bâle, from which they started for Lausanne next day, in three coaches, two horses to each, taking three days for the journey: its only enlivening incident being an uproar between the landlord of an inn on the road, and one of the voituriers who had libelled Boniface's establishment by complaining of the food. "After various defiances on both sides, the landlord said 'Scélérat! Mécréant! Je vous boaxerai!' to which the voiturier replied, 'Aha! Comment dites-vous? Voulez-vous boaxer? Eh? Voulez-vous? Ah! Boaxez-moi donc! Boaxez-moi!'—at the same time accompanying these retorts with gestures of violent significance, which explained that this new verb-active was founded on the well-known English verb to boax, or box. If they used it once, they used it at least a hundred times, and goaded each other to madness with it always." The travellers reached the hotel Gibbon at Lausanne on the evening of Thursday the 11th of June; having been tempted as they came along to rest somewhat short of it, by a delightful glimpse of Neuchâtel. "On consideration however I thought it best to come on here, in case I should find, when I begin to write, that I want streets sometimes. In which case, Geneva (which I hope would answer the purpose) is only four and twenty miles away."
From Strasburg, they took a train on the 8th to Bâle, and the next day, they set out for Lausanne in three carriages, with two horses each, taking three days for the journey. The only exciting moment was a heated argument between the landlord of an inn along the way and one of the carriage drivers, who had complained about the food and called out the quality of Boniface's place. "After various insults from both sides, the landlord shouted 'Scoundrel! Villain! I’ll box your ears!' to which the driver responded, 'Aha! What did you say? Do you want to box? Huh? Do you? Oh! Come on then! Box me! Box me!'—while making wildly expressive gestures that made it clear this new verb was based on the well-known English verb to box. They used it at least a hundred times and drove each other to madness with it." The travelers arrived at Hotel Gibbon in Lausanne on the evening of Thursday, June 11th; they had been tempted to stop a bit earlier by a lovely view of Neuchâtel. "However, I thought it best to continue here, in case I find that I need streets for my writing. In that case, Geneva, which I hope would work, is only twenty-four miles away."
He at once began house-hunting, and had two days' hard work of it. He found the greater part of those let to the English like small villas in the Regent's-park,[225] with verandahs, glass-doors opening on lawns, and alcoves overlooking the lake and mountains. One he was tempted by, higher up the hill, "poised above the town like a ship on a high wave;" but the possible fury of its winter winds deterred him. Greater still was the temptation to him of "L'Elysée," more a mansion than a villa; with splendid grounds overlooking the lake, and in its corridors and staircases as well as furniture like an old fashioned country house in England; which he could have got for twelve months for £160. "But when I came to consider its vastness, I was rather dismayed at the prospect of windy nights in the autumn, with nobody staying in the house to make it gay." And so he again fell back upon the very first place he had seen, Rosemont, quite a doll's house; with two pretty little salons, a dining-room, hall, and kitchen, on the ground floor; and with just enough bedrooms upstairs to leave the family one to spare. "It is beautifully situated on the hill that rises from the lake, within ten minutes' walk of this hotel, and furnished, though scantily as all here are, better than others except Elysée, on account of its having being built and fitted up (the little salons in the Parisian way) by the landlady and her husband for themselves. They lived now in a smaller house like a porter's lodge, just within the gate. A portion of the grounds is farmed by a farmer, and he lives close by; so that, while it is secluded, it is not at all lonely." The rent was to be ten pounds a month for half a year, with reduction to eight for the second half, if he should stay so long; and the rooms and furniture were to be described to me, so that according to custom I[226] should be quite at home there, as soon as, also according to a custom well-known, his own ingenious re-arrangements and improvements in the chairs and tables should be completed. "I shall merely observe at present therefore, that my little study is upstairs, and looks out, from two French windows opening into a balcony, on the lake and mountains; and that there are roses enough to smother the whole establishment of the Daily News in. Likewise, there is a pavilion in the garden, which has but two rooms in it; in one of which, I think you shall do your work when you come. As to bowers for reading and smoking, there are as many scattered about the grounds, as there are in Chalk-farm tea-gardens. But the Rosemont bowers are really beautiful. Will you come to the bowers. . . ?"
He immediately started looking for a place to live and spent two days searching hard. He found most of the rentals for the English to be like small villas in Regent’s Park,[225] with porches, glass doors opening onto lawns, and alcoves overlooking the lake and mountains. One place tempted him, higher up the hill, "poised above the town like a ship on a high wave," but the potential strength of the winter winds made him hesitate. He was even more tempted by "L'Elysée," which was more like a mansion than a villa; it had gorgeous grounds overlooking the lake, and its corridors, staircases, and furniture resembled an old-fashioned country house in England. He could rent it for twelve months for £160. "But when I thought about how big it was, I felt a bit overwhelmed at the idea of windy autumn nights with no one in the house to make it lively." So he went back to the very first place he had seen, Rosemont, which was charmingly small; it had two lovely little salons, a dining room, hall, and kitchen on the ground floor, and just enough bedrooms upstairs to leave one for guests. "It’s beautifully located on the hill that rises from the lake, just a ten-minute walk from this hotel, and although it's furnished simply like everything else here, it's nicer than most except for Elysée because the landlady and her husband built and decorated it (the little salons in the Parisian style) for themselves. They now live in a smaller house like a porter’s lodge right by the gate. Part of the grounds is farmed by a farmer who lives nearby; so while it's secluded, it doesn't feel lonely at all." The rent was set at ten pounds a month for the first six months, dropping to eight for the second half if he decided to stay that long; and they would describe the rooms and furniture to me so that, following the usual practice, I would feel right at home there as soon as, according to a well-known custom, he finished his inventive rearrangements and improvements on the chairs and tables. "I’ll just mention for now that my little study is upstairs and has two French windows opening to a balcony with views of the lake and mountains; and that there are enough roses to smother the entire office of the Daily News. Also, there’s a small pavilion in the garden with just two rooms; I think you can work in one of them when you come. As for reading and smoking spots, there are as many scattered throughout the grounds as there are in the Chalk Farm tea gardens. But the Rosemont spots are truly beautiful. Will you come to the spots...?"
Very pleasant were the earliest impressions of Switzerland with which this first letter closed. "The country is delightful in the extreme—as leafy, green, and shady, as England; full of deep glens, and branchy places (rather a Leigh Huntish expression), and bright with all sorts of flowers in profusion.[110] It abounds in singing birds besides—very pleasant after Italy; and the moonlight on the lake is noble. Prodigious mountains rise up from its opposite shore (it is eight or nine miles across, at this point), and the Simplon, the St. Gothard, Mont Blanc, and all the Alpine wonders are piled there, in tremendous grandeur. The cultivation is uncommonly rich and profuse. There are all manner[227] of walks, vineyards, green lanes, cornfields, and pastures full of hay. The general neatness is as remarkable as in England. There are no priests or monks in the streets, and the people appear to be industrious and thriving. French (and very intelligible and pleasant French) seems to be the universal language. I never saw so many booksellers' shops crammed within the same space, as in the steep up-and-down streets of Lausanne."
The earliest impressions of Switzerland that wrapped up this first letter were very pleasant. "The country is incredibly delightful—just as leafy, green, and shady as England; filled with deep valleys and wooded areas (a bit of a Leigh Huntish phrase), and bright with all sorts of flowers everywhere. It also has a lot of singing birds, which is a nice change from Italy; and the moonlight over the lake is stunning. Huge mountains rise up from the opposite shore (it's about eight or nine miles across at this point), and the Simplon, St. Gothard, Mont Blanc, and all the Alpine wonders are stacked together in breathtaking grandeur. The agriculture is exceptionally rich and abundant. There are all kinds of paths, vineyards, green lanes, cornfields, and hay-filled pastures. The overall tidiness is as impressive as in England. There are no priests or monks in the streets, and the people seem industrious and thriving. French (which is very clear and pleasant) appears to be the universal language. I’ve never seen so many bookstores packed into the same area as in the steep streets of Lausanne."
Of the little town he spoke in his next letter as having its natural dulness increased by that fact of its streets going up and down hill abruptly and steeply, like the streets in a dream; and the consequent difficulty of getting about it. "There are some suppressed churches in it, now used as packers' warehouses: with cranes and pulleys growing out of steeple-towers; little doors for lowering goods through, fitted into blocked-up oriel windows; and cart-horses stabled in crypts. These also help to give it a deserted and disused appearance. On the other hand, as it is a perfectly free place subject to no prohibitions or restrictions of any kind, there are all sorts of new French books and publications in it, and all sorts of fresh intelligence from the world beyond the Jura mountains. It contains only one Roman Catholic church, which is mainly for the use of the Savoyards and Piedmontese who come trading over the Alps. As for the country, it cannot be praised too highly, or reported too beautiful. There are no great waterfalls, or walks through mountain-gorges, close at hand, as in some other parts of Switzerland; but there is a charming variety of enchanting scenery. There is the shore of the lake, where you[228] may dip your feet, as you walk, in the deep blue water, if you choose. There are the hills to climb up, leading to the great heights above the town; or to stagger down, leading to the lake. There is every possible variety of deep green lanes, vineyard, cornfield, pasture-land, and wood. There are excellent country roads that might be in Kent or Devonshire: and, closing up every view and vista, is an eternally changing range of prodigious mountains—sometimes red, sometimes grey, sometimes purple, sometimes black; sometimes white with snow; sometimes close at hand; and sometimes very ghosts in the clouds and mist."
In his next letter, he described the little town as having its natural dullness intensified by the steep, abrupt hills of its streets that felt like something out of a dream, making it tough to get around. "There are some old churches that have been turned into warehouses for packers, with cranes and pulleys sticking out from the steeples, tiny doors for lowering goods through blocked-up oriel windows, and cart-horses kept in crypts. This adds to its abandoned and unused vibe. However, since it’s a completely free place with no prohibitions or restrictions, it’s filled with all kinds of new French books and publications, as well as fresh news from beyond the Jura mountains. There’s only one Roman Catholic church left, mainly for the Savoyards and Piedmontese who come to trade over the Alps. As for the countryside, it’s hard to praise it enough or describe how beautiful it is. There aren’t any major waterfalls or trails through mountain gorges nearby, like in some other areas of Switzerland, but the variety of stunning scenery is delightful. There’s the lakeshore where you can dip your feet in the deep blue water while you walk if you want. There are hills to climb up, leading to the heights above the town, or to stagger down towards the lake. You’ll find every kind of deep green lane, vineyard, cornfield, pasture, and wood. There are great country roads that could be from Kent or Devonshire, and surrounding every view is a constantly changing range of enormous mountains—sometimes red, sometimes grey, sometimes purple, sometimes black; sometimes white with snow; sometimes close by, and sometimes just ghostly figures in the clouds and mist."
In the heart of these things he was now to live and work for at least six months; and, as the love of nature was as much a passion with him in his intervals of leisure, as the craving for crowds and streets when he was busy with the creatures of his fancy, no man was better qualified to enjoy what was thus open to him from his little farm.
In the center of all this, he was now set to live and work for at least six months. Since he had a deep love for nature during his free time, just as he longed for crowds and busy streets when he was engaged with his creative ideas, no one was better suited to appreciate what his small farm had to offer.
The view from each side of it was different in character, and from one there was visible the liveliest aspect of Lausanne itself, close at hand, and seeming, as he said, to be always coming down the hill with its steeples and towers, not able to stop itself. "From a fine long broad balcony on which the windows of my little study on the first floor (where I am now writing) open, the lake is seen to wonderful advantage,—losing itself by degrees in the solemn gorge of mountains leading to the Simplon pass. Under the balcony is a stone colonnade, on which the six French windows of the drawing-room open; and quantities of plants are clustered about the pillars and seats, very prettily. One[229] of these drawing-rooms is furnished (like a French hotel) with red velvet, and the other with green; in both, plenty of mirrors and nice white muslin curtains; and for the larger one in cold weather there is a carpet, the floors being bare now, but inlaid in squares with different-coloured woods." His description did not close until, in every nook and corner inhabited by the several members of the family, I was made to feel myself at home; but only the final sentence need be added. "Walking out into the balcony as I write, I am suddenly reminded, by the sight of the Castle of Chillon glittering in the sunlight on the lake, that I omitted to mention that object in my catalogue of the[230] Rosemont beauties. Please to put it in, like George Robins, in a line by itself."
The view from each side was different, and one side showed off the most vibrant aspect of Lausanne itself, right there, and as he said, always rolling down the hill with its steeples and towers, unable to stop. "From a nice long balcony where the windows of my little study on the first floor (where I'm writing now) open, you can see the lake beautifully—gradually losing itself in the majestic gorge of mountains leading to the Simplon pass. Below the balcony is a stone colonnade, with six French windows from the drawing-room opening onto it, and lots of plants clustered around the pillars and seating areas, which looks really nice. One[229] of these drawing-rooms is decorated (like a French hotel) with red velvet, and the other with green; both have plenty of mirrors and lovely white muslin curtains; and for the bigger one in cold weather, there's a carpet, although the floors are bare now and inlaid with different-colored wood squares." His description didn't end until I felt at home in every nook and cranny used by the family, but only the last sentence is needed. "As I step out onto the balcony while I write, I'm suddenly reminded by the sight of the Castle of Chillon sparkling in the sunlight on the lake that I forgot to mention it in my list of the[230] Rosemont beauties. Please make sure to add it, like George Robins, in a separate line."

Regular evening walks of nine or ten miles were named in the same letter (22nd of June) as having been begun;[111] and thoughts of his books were already stirring in him. "An odd shadowy undefined idea is at work within me, that I could connect a great battle-field somehow with my little Christmas story. Shapeless visions of the repose and peace pervading it in after-time; with the corn and grass growing over the slain, and people singing at the plough; are so perpetually floating before me, that I cannot but think there may turn out to be something good in them when I see them more plainly. . . . I want to get Four Numbers of the monthly book done here, and the Christmas book. If all goes well, and nothing changes, and I can accomplish this by the end of November, I shall run over to you in England for a few days with a light heart, and leave Roche to move the caravan to Paris in the meanwhile. It will be just the very point in the story when the life and crowd of that extraordinary place will come vividly to my assistance in writing." Such was his design; and, though difficulties[231] not now seen started up which he had a hard fight to get through, he managed to accomplish it. His letter ended with a promise to tell me, when next he wrote, of the small colony of English who seemed ready to give him even more than the usual welcome. Two visits had thus early been paid him by Mr. Haldimand, formerly a member of the English parliament, an accomplished man, who, with his sister Mrs. Marcet (the well-known authoress), had long made Lausanne his home. He had a very fine seat just below Rosemont, and his character and station had made him quite the little sovereign of the place. "He has founded and endowed all sorts of hospitals and institutions here, and he gives a dinner to-morrow to introduce our neighbours, whoever they are."
Regular evening walks of nine or ten miles were mentioned in the same letter (June 22) as having started; [111] and thoughts of his books were already stirring in him. "A strange, vague idea is brewing inside me, that I might connect a major battlefield somehow with my little Christmas story. Shapeless images of the peace and calm surrounding it later on; with corn and grass growing over the fallen, and people singing while plowing; are constantly floating in front of me, making me think that there might be something worthwhile in them when I can see them more clearly. . . . I want to finish Four Numbers of the monthly book here, along with the Christmas book. If everything goes well, nothing changes, and I can get this done by the end of November, I’ll come over to you in England for a few days with a light heart, leaving Roche to move the caravan to Paris in the meantime. It will be the perfect moment in the story when the life and energy of that incredible place will vividly help me in my writing." That was his plan; and, although unforeseen difficulties arose that he had to struggle through, he managed to complete it. His letter concluded with a promise to tell me, in his next correspondence, about the small colony of English people who seemed eager to give him even more than the usual welcome. He had already received two visits from Mr. Haldimand, a former member of the English parliament, an educated man, who, along with his sister Mrs. Marcet (the well-known author), had long made Lausanne their home. He had a beautiful estate just below Rosemont, and his character and status made him quite the little ruler of the area. "He has established and funded all sorts of hospitals and institutions here, and he’s hosting a dinner tomorrow to introduce our neighbors, whoever they may be."
He found them to be happily the kind of people who rendered entirely pleasant those frank and cordial hospitalities which the charm of his personal intercourse made every one so eager to offer him. The dinner at Mr. Haldimand's was followed by dinners from the guests he met there; from an English lady[112] married to a Swiss, Mr. and Mrs. Cerjat, clever and agreeable both, far beyond the common; from her sister wedded to an Englishman, Mr. and Mrs. Goff; and from Mr. and Mrs. Watson of Rockingham-castle in Northamptonshire,[232] who had taken the Elysée on Dickens giving it up, and with whom, as with Mr. Haldimand, his relations continued to be very intimate long after he left Lausanne. In his drive to Mr. Cerjat's dinner a whimsical difficulty presented itself. He had set up, for use of his wife and children, an odd little one-horse-carriage; made to hold three persons sideways, so that they should avoid the wind always blowing up or down the valley; and he found it attended with one of the drollest consequences conceivable. "It can't be easily turned; and as you face to the side, all sorts of evolutions are necessary to bring you 'broad-side to' before the door of the house where you are going. The country houses here are very like those upon the Thames between Richmond and Kingston (this, particularly), with grounds all round. At Mr. Cerjat's we were obliged to be carried, like the child's riddle, round the house and round the house, without touching the house; and we were presented in the most alarming manner, three of a row, first to all the people in the kitchen, then to the governess who was dressing in her bedroom, then to the drawing-room where the company were waiting for us, then to the dining-room where they were spreading the table, and finally to the hall where we were got out—scraping the windows of each apartment as we glared slowly into it."
He found them to be the kind of people who made their warm and friendly hospitality completely enjoyable, thanks to the charm of his personal interactions that made everyone eager to invite him. The dinner at Mr. Haldimand's was followed by invitations from the guests he met there: an English lady married to a Swiss man, Mr. and Mrs. Cerjat, who were both smart and delightful, far beyond the average; from her sister married to an Englishman, Mr. and Mrs. Goff; and from Mr. and Mrs. Watson of Rockingham Castle in Northamptonshire, who had taken over the Elysée after Dickens gave it up, and with whom, just like with Mr. Haldimand, he kept close ties long after leaving Lausanne. On his way to Mr. Cerjat's dinner, he encountered a somewhat amusing challenge. He had bought a quirky little one-horse carriage for his wife and kids that could fit three people sideways, designed to shield them from the wind that always blew up or down the valley. However, it led to one of the most amusing situations imaginable. "It can’t be easily turned; and since you’re facing sideways, all sorts of maneuvers are required to position you 'broadside to' the door of the house you’re going to. The countryside homes here resemble those along the Thames between Richmond and Kingston (especially this one), with grounds all around. At Mr. Cerjat's, we had to be carried, like a child’s riddle, around the house and around the house, without actually touching the house; and we were introduced in the most alarming way, three of us in a row, first to everyone in the kitchen, then to the governess who was getting dressed in her bedroom, then to the drawing-room where guests were waiting for us, then to the dining-room where they were setting the table, and finally to the hall where we were let out—scraping against the windows of each room as we slowly peered inside."
A dinner party of his own followed of course; and a sad occurrence, of which he and his guests were unconscious, signalised the evening (15th of July). "While we were sitting at dinner, one of the prettiest girls in Lausanne was drowned in the lake—in the most peaceful water, reflecting the steep mountains, and[233] crimson with the setting sun. She was bathing in one of the nooks set apart for women, and seems somehow to have entangled her feet in the skirts of her dress. She was an accomplished swimmer, as many of the girls are here, and drifted, suddenly, out of only five feet water. Three or four friends who were with her, ran away, screaming. Our children's governess was on the lake in a boat with M. Verdeil (my prison-doctor) and his family. They ran inshore immediately; the body was quickly got out; and M. Verdeil, with three or four other doctors, laboured for some hours to restore animation; but she only sighed once. After all that time, she was obliged to be borne, stiff and stark, to her father's house. She was his only child, and but 17 years old. He has been nearly dead since, and all Lausanne has been full of the story. I was down by the lake, near the place, last night; and a boatman acted to me the whole scene: depositing himself finally on a heap of stones, to represent the body."
A dinner party at his place naturally followed, and a tragic incident, which he and his guests were unaware of, marked the evening (15th of July). "While we were having dinner, one of the prettiest girls in Lausanne drowned in the lake—in the calm water, reflecting the steep mountains, and lit up with the setting sun. She was swimming in one of the areas reserved for women and somehow got her feet tangled in her dress. She was a skilled swimmer, like many of the girls here, and suddenly drifted out of the shallow water. Three or four friends who were with her ran away, screaming. Our children's governess was out on the lake in a boat with M. Verdeil (my prison doctor) and his family. They hurried to the shore right away; the body was quickly retrieved; and M. Verdeil, along with three or four other doctors, worked for hours to try to revive her, but she only sighed once. After all that time, she had to be carried, stiff and lifeless, to her father’s house. She was his only child and just 17 years old. He has been nearly devastated since, and the story has spread throughout Lausanne. I was down by the lake near that spot last night; and a boatman reenacted the whole scene for me, finally settling himself on a pile of stones to represent the body."
With M. Verdeil, physician to the prison and vice-president of the council of health, introduced by Mr. Haldimand, there had already been much communication; and I could give nothing more characteristic of Dickens than his reference to this, and other similar matters in which his interest was strongly moved during his first weeks at Lausanne.[113]
With M. Verdeil, the prison doctor and vice-president of the health council, introduced by Mr. Haldimand, there had already been a lot of communication; and I could share nothing more typical of Dickens than his mention of this and other similar issues that captured his strong interest during his first weeks in Lausanne.[113]
"Some years ago, when they set about reforming the prison at Lausanne, they turned their attention, in a correspondence of republican feeling, to America; and taking the Philadelphian system for granted, adopted it. Terrible fits, new phases of mental affection, and horrible madness, among the prisoners, were very soon the result; and attained to such an alarming height, that M. Verdeil, in his public capacity, began to report against the system, and went on reporting and working against it until he formed a party who were determined not to have it, and caused it to be abolished—except in cases where the imprisonment does not exceed ten months in the whole. It is remarkable that in his notes of the different cases, there is every effect I mentioned as having observed myself at Philadelphia; even down to those contained in the description of the man who had been there thirteen years, and who picked his hands so much as he talked. He has only recently, he says, read the American Notes; but he is so much struck by the perfect coincidence that he intends to republish some extracts from his own notes, side by side with these passages of mine translated into French. I went with him over the prison the other day. It is wonderfully well arranged for a continental jail, and in perfect[235] order. The sentences however, or some of them, are very terrible. I saw one man sent there for murder under circumstances of mitigation—for 30 years. Upon the silent social system all the time! They weave, and plait straw, and make shoes, small articles of turnery and carpentry, and little common wooden clocks. But the sentences are too long for that monotonous and hopeless life; and, though they are well-fed and cared for, they generally break down utterly after two or three years. One delusion seems to become common to three-fourths of them after a certain time of imprisonment. Under the impression that there is something destructive put into their food 'pour les guérir de crime' (says M. Verdeil), they refuse to eat!"
"Several years ago, when they started reforming the prison in Lausanne, they looked to America for inspiration, influenced by a sense of republican ideals. They assumed the Philadelphian system was the way to go and adopted it. Soon after, there were alarming incidents of severe mental illness and disturbing madness among the inmates. The situation got so serious that M. Verdeil, in his official capacity, began to speak out against the system and continued to advocate against it until he rallied a group determined to put an end to it, leading to its abolition—except for cases where the imprisonment is shorter than ten months in total. Interestingly, in his notes on various cases, he recorded every effect I mentioned from my own observations in Philadelphia; even down to the details about a man who had been incarcerated for thirteen years and who picked at his hands while talking. He mentions that he recently read the American Notes; and he is so amazed by the striking similarities that he plans to republish some excerpts from his own notes alongside my translated passages in French. I visited the prison with him the other day. It's impressively organized for a continental jail and in perfect[235] order. However, some of the sentences are quite harsh. I saw one man sentenced to thirty years for murder under mitigating circumstances—forced into the silent social system the whole time! They weave, braid straw, make shoes, small wood products, and basic wooden clocks. But the sentences are too long for such a monotonous and despairing life; and despite being well-fed and cared for, they typically break down completely after two to three years. After a certain amount of time in prison, a shared delusion seems to emerge among about three-fourths of them. Under the impression that something harmful is added to their food 'to cure them of crime' (as M. Verdeil puts it), they refuse to eat!"
It was at the Blind Institution, however, of which Mr. Haldimand was the president and great benefactor, that Dickens's attention was most deeply arrested; and there were two cases in especial of which the detail may be read with as much interest now as when my friend's letters were written, and as to which his own suggestions open up still rather startling trains of thought. The first, which in its attraction for him he found equal even to Laura Bridgman's, was that of a young man of 18: "born deaf and dumb, and stricken blind by an accident when he was about five years old. The Director of the institution is a young German, of great ability, and most uncommonly prepossessing appearance. He propounded to the scientific bodies of Geneva, a year ago (when this young man was under education in the asylum), the possibility of teaching him to speak—in other words, to play with his tongue upon his teeth and palate as if on an instrument, and[236] connect particular performances with particular words conveyed to him in the finger-language. They unanimously agreed that it was quite impossible. The German set to work, and the young man now speaks very plainly and distinctly: without the least modulation, of course, but with comparatively little hesitation; expressing the words aloud as they are struck, so to speak, upon his hands; and showing the most intense and wonderful delight in doing it. This is commonly acquired, as you know, by the deaf and dumb who learn by sight; but it has never before been achieved in the case of a deaf, dumb, and blind subject. He is an extremely lively, intelligent, good-humoured fellow; an excellent carpenter; a first-rate turner; and runs about the building with a certainty and confidence which none of the merely blind pupils acquire. He has a great many ideas, and an instinctive dread of death. He knows of God, as of Thought enthroned somewhere; and once told, on nature's prompting (the devil's of course), a lie. He was sitting at dinner, and the Director asked him whether he had had anything to drink; to which he instantly replied 'No,' in order that he might get some more, though he had been served in his turn. It was explained to him that this was a wrong thing, and wouldn't do, and that he was to be locked up in a room for it: which was done. Soon after this, he had a dream of being bitten in the shoulder by some strange animal. As it left a great impression on his mind, he told M. the Director that he had told another lie in the night. In proof of it he related his dream, and added, 'It must be a lie you know, because there is no strange animal here,[237] and I never was bitten.' Being informed that this sort of lie was a harmless one, and was called a dream, he asked whether dead people ever dreamed[114] while they were lying in the ground. He is one of the most curious and interesting studies possible."
It was at the Blind Institution, where Mr. Haldimand was the president and a major benefactor, that Dickens's attention was truly captured; and there were two cases in particular that remain as compelling to read about now as they were when my friend's letters were written, and his own suggestions still provoke rather surprising lines of thought. The first case, which intrigued him as much as Laura Bridgman did, involved an 18-year-old young man: "born deaf and mute, and blinded by an accident when he was about five years old. The Director of the institution is a young German, very talented, and exceptionally attractive. A year ago, when this young man was being educated in the asylum, he proposed to the scientific community of Geneva the possibility of teaching him to speak—essentially, to use his tongue on his teeth and palate as if it were an instrument, and connect specific actions with specific words conveyed to him in finger language. They all agreed it was impossible. The German set to work, and now the young man speaks very clearly and distinctly: without any modulation, of course, but with relatively little hesitation; expressing the words aloud as they come to him, so to speak, based on what he feels with his hands; and showing tremendous joy in doing it. This is usually learned by the deaf and mute who learn through sight; but it has never been accomplished with someone who is deaf, mute, and blind. He is an extremely lively, intelligent, and cheerful guy; an excellent carpenter; a top-notch turner; and moves around the building with confidence and certainty that none of the just blind students possess. He has many ideas and an instinctive fear of death. He knows of God, as if encompassing Thought somewhere; and once, on nature's prompting (or perhaps the devil's), he told a lie. He was sitting at dinner, and the Director asked him if he had anything to drink; to which he immediately replied 'No,' in hopes of getting more, even though he had already been served. It was explained to him that this was wrong and that he would be locked in a room for it: which happened. Shortly after this, he dreamt of being bitten on the shoulder by some strange animal. Because it left a strong impression on him, he told M. the Director that he had lied again during the night. To prove it, he recounted his dream and added, 'It has to be a lie, you know, because there are no strange animals here, and I was never bitten.' When he was told that this kind of lie is harmless and is called a dream, he asked if dead people ever dreamed while lying in the ground. He is one of the most curious and interesting subjects possible."
The second case had come in on the very day that Dickens visited the place. "When I was there" (8th of July) "there had come in, that morning, a girl of ten years old, born deaf and dumb and blind, and so perfectly untaught that she has not learnt to have the least control even over the performance of the common natural functions. . . . And yet she laughs sometimes (good God! conceive what at!)—and is dreadfully sensitive from head to foot, and very much alarmed, for some hours before the coming on of a thunder storm. Mr. Haldimand has been long trying to induce her parents to send her to the asylum. At last they have consented; and when I saw her, some of the little blind girls were trying to make friends with her, and to lead her gently about. She was dressed in just a loose robe from the necessity of changing her frequently, but had been in a bath, and had had her nails cut (which were previously very long and dirty), and was not at all ill-looking—quite the reverse; with a remarkably good and pretty little mouth, but a low and undeveloped head of course. It was pointed out to me, as very singular, that the moment she is left alone, or freed from anybody's touch (which is the same thing[238] to her), she instantly crouches down with her hands up to her ears, in exactly the position of a child before its birth; and so remains. I thought this such a strange coincidence with the utter want of advancement in her moral being, that it made a great impression on me; and conning it over and over, I began to think that this is surely the invariable action of savages too, and that I have seen it over and over again described in books of voyages and travels. Not having any of these with me, I turned to Robinson Crusoe; and I find De Foe says, describing the savages who came on the island after Will Atkins began to change for the better and commanded under the grave Spaniard for the common defence, 'their posture was generally sitting upon the ground, with their knees up towards their mouth, and the head put between the two hands, leaning down upon the knees'—exactly the same attitude!" In his next week's letter he reported further: "I have not been to the Blind asylum again yet, but they tell me that the deaf and dumb and blind child's face is improving obviously, and that she takes great delight in the first effort made by the Director to connect himself with an occupation of her time. He gives her, every day, two smooth round pebbles to roll over and over between her two hands. She appears to have an idea that it is to lead to something; distinctly recognizes the hand that gives them to her, as a friendly and protecting one; and sits for hours quite busy."
The second case came in on the very day that Dickens visited the place. "When I was there" (July 8th) "a ten-year-old girl came in that morning, who was born deaf, dumb, and blind, and so completely untaught that she hadn’t even learned to control basic natural functions. . . . And yet she laughs sometimes (can you imagine what at?)—and is extremely sensitive all over, getting very alarmed for several hours leading up to a thunderstorm. Mr. Haldimand has been trying for a long time to get her parents to send her to the asylum. Finally, they agreed; and when I saw her, some of the little blind girls were trying to make friends with her and gently guide her around. She was dressed in a loose robe since they had to change her often, but she had just taken a bath, and her nails (which had been very long and dirty) were cut. She didn’t look sick at all—quite the opposite; she had a remarkably nice and pretty little mouth, though her head was low and underdeveloped. It was pointed out to me, as very strange, that the moment she’s left alone or freed from anyone’s touch (which means the same thing to her), she immediately crouches down with her hands over her ears, in exactly the position of a child before birth; and she stays that way. I thought this was such a strange coincidence with her complete lack of moral development that it made a big impression on me; and thinking it over and over, I began to think that this must be the typical behavior of savages too, and I’ve read about it numerous times in travel books. Without any of those with me, I turned to Robinson Crusoe; and I found that Defoe describes the savages who came to the island after Will Atkins began to improve and was under the serious Spaniard for their common safety, saying, 'their posture was generally sitting on the ground, with their knees drawn up toward their mouths, and their head resting in their hands, leaning down on their knees'—exactly the same position!" In his letter the following week, he reported further: "I haven’t been back to the Blind asylum yet, but they tell me that the deaf, dumb, and blind child's face is obviously improving, and that she enjoys the first attempts by the Director to engage her in something to do. Every day, he gives her two smooth round pebbles to roll between her hands. She seems to understand that it leads to something; she clearly recognizes the hand that gives them to her as friendly and protective; and she sits for hours completely absorbed."
To one part of his very thoughtful suggestion I objected, and would have attributed to a mere desire for warmth, in her as in the savage, what he supposed to be part of an undeveloped or embryo state explaining[239] also the absence of sentient and moral being. To this he replied (25th of July): "I do not think that there is reason for supposing that the savage attitude originates in the desire of warmth, because all naked savages inhabit hot climates; and their instinctive attitude, if it had reference to heat or cold, would probably be the coolest possible; like their delight in water, and swimming. I do not think there is any race of savage men, however low in grade, inhabiting cold climates, who do not kill beasts and wear their skins. The girl decidedly improves in face, and, if one can yet use the word as applied to her, in manner too. No communication by the speech of touch has yet been established with her, but the time has not been long enough." In a later letter he tells me (24th of August): "The deaf, dumb, and blind girl is decidedly improved, and very much improved, in this short time. No communication is yet established with her, but that is not to be expected. They have got her out of that strange, crouching position; dressed her neatly; and accustomed her to have a pleasure in society. She laughs frequently, and also claps her hands and jumps; having, God knows how, some inward satisfaction. I never saw a more tremendous thing in its way, in my life, than when they stood her, t'other day, in the centre of a group of blind children who sang a chorus to the piano; and brought her hand, and kept it, in contact with the instrument. A shudder pervaded her whole being, her breath quickened, her colour deepened,—and I can compare it to nothing but returning animation in a person nearly dead. It was really awful to see how the sensation of the music fluttered and stirred the locked-up[240] soul within her." The same letter spoke again of the youth: "The male subject is well and jolly as possible. He is very fond of smoking. I have arranged to supply him with cigars during our stay here; so he and I are in amazing sympathy. I don't know whether he thinks I grow them, or make them, or produce them by winking, or what. But it gives him a notion that the world in general belongs to me." . . . Before his kind friend left Lausanne the poor fellow had been taught to say, "Monsieur Dickens m'a donné les cigares," and at their leave-taking his gratitude was expressed by incessant repetition of these words for a full half-hour.
I disagreed with part of his very thoughtful suggestion and would have attributed to a simple desire for warmth, in her as in the primitive human, what he considered to be a sign of an undeveloped or early state, which also explained[239] the lack of sentient and moral existence. He replied (July 25th): "I don't think we should assume that the primitive state comes from a desire for warmth because all naked primitive people live in hot climates; their natural stance, if it were related to temperature, would likely be the coolest possible, similar to their enjoyment of water and swimming. I don't believe there is any primitive group, no matter how low in status, living in cold regions that doesn't hunt animals and wear their skins. The girl shows definite improvement in her facial expression and, if we can still use the term, in her behavior as well. We haven't yet established communication through touch with her, but it hasn't been long enough." In a later letter, he wrote to me (August 24th): "The deaf, mute, and blind girl has definitely improved, and significantly so, in this short time. No communication has been established with her yet, but that's to be expected. They've gotten her out of that odd, crouched position, dressed her nicely, and helped her find joy in socializing. She laughs often and even claps her hands and jumps, seemingly having some inner pleasure. I have never witnessed anything as incredible as when they stood her the other day in the middle of a group of blind children who sang along with the piano; they brought her hand to the instrument and maintained that contact. A shiver ran through her entire being, her breathing quickened, and her color deepened—it's like witnessing someone on the verge of death start to come back to life. It was truly astonishing to see how the sensation of the music stirred the imprisoned[240] soul inside her." The same letter mentioned the young man: "The male subject is as cheerful and happy as can be. He loves to smoke. I've arranged to keep him supplied with cigars during our time here; so he and I are quite in sync. I don't know if he thinks I grow them, make them, or produce them magically or something else, but it makes him think the world at large is mine." … Before his kind friend left Lausanne, the poor guy had learned to say, "Monsieur Dickens m'a donné les cigares," and when they said goodbye, he expressed his gratitude by repeating those words over and over for a whole half-hour.
Certainly by no man was gratitude more persistently earned, than by Dickens, from all to whom nature or the world had been churlish or unfair. Not to those only made desolate by poverty or the temptations incident to it, but to those whom natural defects or infirmities had placed at a disadvantage with their kind, he gave his first consideration; helping them personally where he could, sympathising and sorrowing with them always, but above all applying himself to the investigation of such alleviation or cure as philosophy or science might be able to apply to their condition. This was a desire so eager as properly to be called one of the passions of his life, visible in him to the last hour of it.
Certainly, no one earned gratitude more persistently than Dickens from all those to whom nature or the world had been harsh or unfair. Not just those left desolate by poverty or its temptations, but also those who faced disadvantages due to natural defects or infirmities, received his foremost attention; he helped them personally when he could, always sympathizing and sharing in their sorrow, but above all, he focused on finding relief or solutions through philosophy or science for their situations. This strong desire was truly one of the passions of his life, evident in him until the very end.
Only a couple of weeks, themselves not idle ones, had passed over him at Rosemont when he made a dash at the beginning of his real work; from which indeed he had only been detained so long by the non-arrival of a box dispatched from London before his own[241] departure, containing not his proper writing materials only, but certain quaint little bronze figures that thus early stood upon his desk, and were as much needed for the easy flow of his writing as blue ink or quill pens. "I have not been idle" (28th of June) "since I have been here, though at first I was 'kept out' of the big box as you know. I had a good deal to write for Lord John about the Ragged schools. I set to work and did that. A good deal for Miss Coutts, in reference to her charitable projects. I set to work and did that. Half of the children's New Testament[115] to write, or pretty nearly. I set to work and did that. Next I cleared off the greater part of such correspondence as I had rashly pledged myself to; and then. . . .
Only a few weeks, which weren't idle ones, passed while he was at Rosemont before he jumped into his real work; he had really only been delayed by the late arrival of a box sent from London right before he left, which included not just his writing supplies but also some quirky little bronze figures that he needed on his desk to help his writing flow as much as blue ink or quill pens. "I have not been idle" (June 28) "since I've been here, even though initially I was 'kept out' of the big box, as you know. I had a lot to write for Lord John about the Ragged schools. I got to work and did that. Also quite a bit for Miss Coutts regarding her charitable projects. I got to work and did that. I had nearly half of the children's New Testament[115] to write. I got to work and did that. Next, I tackled most of the correspondence that I had carelessly promised to handle; and then. . . .
The same letter told me that he still inclined strongly to "the field of battle notion" for his Christmas volume, but was not as yet advanced in it; being curious first to see whether its capacity seemed to strike me at all. My only objection was to his adventure of opening two stories at once, of which he did not yet see the full danger; but for the moment the Christmas fancy was laid aside, and not resumed, except in passing allusions, until after the close of August, when the first two numbers of Dombey were done. The interval supplied fresh illustration of his life in his new home, not without much interest; and as I have shown what a pleasant social circle, "wonderfully friendly and hospitable"[116] to the last, already had grouped itself round him in Lausanne, and how full of "matter to be heard and learn'd" he found such institutions as its prison and blind school, the picture will receive attractive touches if I borrow from his letters written during this outset of Dombey, some farther notices as[243] well of the general progress of his work, as of what was specially interesting or amusing to him at the time, and of how the country and the people impressed him. In all of these his character will be found strongly marked.
The same letter told me that he was still very much leaning towards the "battlefield idea" for his Christmas book, but he hadn’t made much progress on it yet; he was curious to see if it resonated with me at all. My only concern was his plan to open two stories at once, which he didn’t fully realize could be risky. However, for now, the Christmas concept was put on hold and wasn’t picked up again, except for a few mentions, until after the end of August when the first two issues of Dombey were completed. The break provided fresh insights into his life in his new home, which was quite interesting; as I’ve shown how a lovely social circle, "wonderfully friendly and hospitable"[116] to the end, had formed around him in Lausanne, and how rich in "things to hear and learn" he found places like its prison and blind school, the picture will become even more appealing if I include some additional notes from his letters written during this start of Dombey. These notes will reflect both the general progress of his work and what particularly captivated or amused him at the time, as well as how the country and its people left an impression on him. In all of these, his personality will be clearly evident.
CHAPTER XI.
SWISS PEOPLE AND SCENERY.
1846.
What at once had struck him as the wonderful feature in the mountain scenery was its everchanging and yet unchanging aspect. It was never twice like the same thing to him. Shifting and altering, advancing and retreating, fifty times a day, it was unalterable only in its grandeur. The lake itself too had every kind of varying beauty for him. By moonlight it was indescribably solemn; and before the coming on of a storm had a strange property in it of being disturbed, while yet the sky remained clear and the evening bright, which he found to be mysterious and impressive in an especial degree. Such a storm had come among his earliest and most grateful experiences; a degree of heat worse even than in Italy[117] having disabled him at[245] the outset for all exertion until the lightning, thunder, and rain arrived. The letter telling me this (5th July) described the fruit as so abundant in the little farm, that the trees of the orchard in front of his house were bending beneath it; spoke of a field of wheat sloping down to the side window of his dining-room as already cut and carried; and said that the roses, which the hurricane of rain had swept away, were come back lovelier and in greater numbers than ever.
What struck him immediately as a wonderful feature of the mountain scenery was its constantly changing yet somehow constant appearance. It never looked the same to him twice. Shifting and altering, advancing and retreating, it transformed fifty times a day but remained unchanging only in its grandeur. The lake held every kind of varying beauty for him too. By moonlight, it was indescribably solemn; and just before a storm, it had a strange quality of being unsettled while the sky stayed clear and the evening bright, which he found particularly mysterious and impressive. One such storm was among his earliest and most cherished experiences; a level of heat even worse than in Italy[117] had left him unable to do anything until the lightning, thunder, and rain finally came. The letter informing me of this (5th July) described the fruit on the little farm as so plentiful that the orchard trees in front of his house were bending under the weight; it mentioned a field of wheat sloping down to the side window of his dining room that had already been cut and carried; and it said that the roses, which had been knocked down by the heavy rain, had returned more beautiful and in greater numbers than ever.
Of the ordinary Swiss people he formed from the first a high opinion which everything during his stay among them confirmed. He thought it the greatest injustice to call them "the Americans of the Continent." In his first letters he said of the peasantry all about Lausanne that they were as pleasant a people as need be. He never passed, on any of the roads, man, woman, or child, without a salutation; and anything churlish or disagreeable he never noticed in them. "They have not," he continued, "the sweetness and grace of the Italians, or the agreeable manners of the better specimens of French peasantry, but they are admirably educated (the schools of this canton are extraordinarily good, in every little village), and always[246] prepared to give a civil and pleasant answer. There is no greater mistake. I was talking to my landlord[118] about it the other day, and he said he could not conceive how it had ever arisen, but that when he returned from his eighteen years' service in the English navy he shunned the people, and had no interest in them until they gradually forced their real character upon his observation. We have a cook and a coachman here, taken at hazard from the people of the town; and I never saw more obliging servants, or people who did their work so truly with a will. And in point of cleanliness, order, and punctuality to the moment, they are unrivalled. . . ."
Of the ordinary Swiss people, he formed a high opinion from the beginning, which everything during his stay among them confirmed. He thought it was a huge injustice to call them "the Americans of the Continent." In his first letters, he mentioned that the local farmers around Lausanne were as pleasant a group as one could hope for. He always greeted every man, woman, or child he encountered on the roads, and he never noticed anything rude or disagreeable about them. "They don't have," he continued, "the charm and elegance of the Italians or the nice manners of the best French farmers, but they are incredibly well-educated (the schools in this area are exceptionally good, even in the smallest villages), and they're always ready to give a polite and friendly response. It's a big misconception. I was talking to my landlord about it the other day, and he said he couldn't understand how it had come to be, but when he returned after eighteen years in the English navy, he avoided the people and had no interest in them until they gradually revealed their true character to him. We have a cook and a driver here, randomly chosen from the local population, and I've never seen more accommodating workers or people who do their jobs so genuinely with a will. And in terms of cleanliness, order, and punctuality, they are unmatched. . . ."
The first great gathering of the Swiss peasantry which he saw was in the third week after his arrival, when a country fête was held at a place called The Signal; a deep green wood, on the sides and summit of a very high hill overlooking the town and all the country round; and he gave me very pleasant account of it. "There were various booths for eating and drinking, and the selling of trinkets and sweetmeats; and in one place there was a great circle cleared, in which the common people waltzed and polka'd, without[247] cessation, to the music of a band. There was a great roundabout for children (oh my stars what a family were proprietors of it! A sunburnt father and mother, a humpbacked boy, a great poodle-dog possessed of all sorts of accomplishments, and a young murderer of seventeen who turned the machinery); and there were some games of chance and skill established under trees. It was very pretty. In some of the drinking booths there were parties of German peasants, twenty together perhaps, singing national drinking-songs, and making a most exhilarating and musical chorus by rattling their cups and glasses on the table and drinking them against each other, to a regular tune. You know it as a stage dodge, but the real thing is splendid. Farther down the hill, other peasants were rifle-shooting for prizes, at targets set on the other side of a deep ravine, from two to three hundred yards off. It was quite fearful to see the astonishing accuracy of their aim, and how, every time a rifle awakened the ten thousand echoes of the green glen, some men crouching behind a little wall immediately in front of the targets, sprung up with large numbers in their hands denoting where the ball had struck the bull's eye—and then in a moment disappeared again. Standing in a ring near these shooters was another party of Germans singing hunting-songs, in parts, most melodiously. And down in the distance was Lausanne, with all sorts of haunted-looking old towers rising up before the smooth water of the lake, and an evening sky all red, and gold, and bright green. When it closed in quite dark, all the booths were lighted up; and the twinkling of the lamps[248] among the forest of trees was beautiful. . . ." To this pretty picture, a letter of a little later date, describing a marriage on the farm, added farther comical illustration of the rifle-firing propensities of the Swiss, and had otherwise also whimsical touches of character. "One of the farmer's people—a sister, I think—was married from here the other day. It is wonderful to see how naturally the smallest girls are interested in marriages. Katey and Mamey were as excited as if they were eighteen. The fondness of the Swiss for gunpowder on interesting occasions, is one of the drollest things. For three days before, the farmer himself, in the midst of his various agricultural duties, plunged out of a little door near my windows, about once in every hour, and fired off a rifle. I thought he was shooting rats who were spoiling the vines; but he was merely relieving his mind, it seemed, on the subject of the approaching nuptials. All night afterwards, he and a small circle of friends kept perpetually letting off guns under the casement of the bridal chamber. A Bride is always drest here, in black silk; but this bride wore merino of that colour, observing to her mother when she bought it (the old lady is 82, and works on the farm), 'You know, mother, I am sure to want mourning for you, soon; and the same gown will do.'"[119]
The first big gathering of the Swiss peasants he witnessed was in the third week after his arrival, during a local festival held at a place called The Signal; a lush green forest on the slopes and peak of a very tall hill that looked over the town and the surrounding countryside. He gave me a delightful account of it. "There were various booths for eating and drinking, as well as selling trinkets and sweets; and in one area, there was a large circle cleared where people danced the waltz and polka continuously to the music of a band. There was a big carousel for kids (oh my, what a family ran it! A sun-tanned mom and dad, a hunchbacked boy, a big poodle with all sorts of tricks, and a young kid of about seventeen who operated the machinery); there were also some games of chance and skill set up under trees. It was really charming. In some of the drinking booths, groups of German peasants—maybe twenty of them—were singing traditional drinking songs, creating a lively and melodious chorus by clinking their cups and glasses on the table while toasting each other, all to a catchy tune. You know it as a theatrical gimmick, but the real thing is fantastic. Further down the hill, other peasants were taking aim with rifles for prizes at targets placed across a deep ravine, two to three hundred yards away. It was almost terrifying to see how accurately they shot; every time a rifle echoed through the green valley, some men hidden behind a small wall right in front of the targets would jump up with large numbers indicating where the bullet hit the bull's eye—and then quickly disappear again. Standing nearby was another group of Germans singing hunting songs in harmony, sounding so melodious. And in the distance was Lausanne, with all sorts of old, eerie-looking towers rising before the calm waters of the lake, under a evening sky painted in reds, golds, and bright greens. As it got completely dark, all the booths lit up; the twinkling of the lamps among the trees was beautiful. . . ." To this charming scene, a letter written a bit later, describing a wedding on the farm, added even more comedic insight into the Swiss love for rifle shooting, along with other quirky character traits. "One of the farmer's relatives—his sister, I believe—got married from here the other day. It's amazing how naturally even the youngest girls are fascinated by weddings. Katey and Mamey were as thrilled as if they were eighteen. The Swiss affection for gunpowder on special occasions is one of the funniest things. For three days beforehand, the farmer himself, in the middle of his various farm chores, would pop out of a little door near my windows about once every hour to fire off a rifle. I thought he was shooting rats spoiling the vines, but he was just blowing off steam about the upcoming wedding. All night after that, he and a small group of friends kept firing guns right outside the bridal chamber window. Here, a bride is always dressed in black silk, but this bride wore merino of that color, telling her mother when she bought it (the old lady is 82 and works on the farm), 'You know, mom, I’m sure I’ll need mourning clothes for you soon; and this dress will work just fine.'"
Meanwhile, day by day, he was steadily moving on with his first number; feeling sometimes the want of streets in an "extraordinary nervousness it would be hardly possible to describe," that would come upon him after he had been writing all day; but at all other times finding the repose of the place very favourable to industry. "I am writing slowly at first, of course" (5th of July), "but I hope I shall have finished the first number in the course of a fortnight at farthest. I have done the first chapter, and begun another. I say nothing of the merits thus far, or of the idea beyond what is known to you; because I prefer that you should come as fresh as may be upon them. I shall certainly have a great surprise for people at the end of the fourth number;[120] and I think there is a new and peculiar sort of interest, involving the necessity of a little bit of delicate treatment whereof I will expound my idea to you by and by. When I have done this number, I may take a run to Chamounix perhaps. . . . My thoughts have necessarily been called away from the Christmas book. The first Dombey done, I think I should fly off to that, whenever the idea presented itself vividly before me. I still cherish the Battle fancy, though it is nothing but a fancy as yet." A week later he told me that he hoped to finish the first number by that day week or thereabouts, when he should then run and look for his Christmas book in the glaciers at Chamounix. His progress to this point had been pleasing him. "I think Dombey very strong—with great capacity in its leading idea; plenty of character that is likely to tell;[250] and some rollicking facetiousness, to say nothing of pathos. I hope you will soon judge of it for yourself, however; and I know you will say what you think. I have been very constantly at work." Six days later I heard that he had still eight slips to write, and for a week had put off Chamounix.
Meanwhile, day by day, he was steadily making progress on his first installment; sometimes feeling an overwhelming sense of nervousness that was hard to describe after writing all day, but at all other times finding the calmness of the place very conducive to productivity. "I am writing slowly at first, of course" (5th of July), "but I hope to finish the first installment within two weeks at the latest. I've completed the first chapter and started another. I'm not saying anything about its merits so far or the concept beyond what you already know because I want you to have as fresh a perspective as possible. I will definitely have a big surprise for everyone by the end of the fourth installment; and I think there’s a new and unique kind of interest that requires a bit of delicate handling, which I’ll explain to you later. After I finish this installment, I might take a trip to Chamounix perhaps. . . . My thoughts have understandably shifted away from the Christmas book. Once the first Dombey is done, I think I’ll dive into that whenever the idea comes to me clearly. I still hold onto the Battle idea, even if it’s just an idea for now." A week later, he told me he hoped to finish the first installment by that day next week or so, when he would then go searching for his Christmas book in the glaciers of Chamounix. He was pleased with his progress up to that point. "I think Dombey is very strong—with great potential in its main idea; plenty of characters that are likely to resonate; and some lighthearted humor, not to mention the emotional depth. I hope you’ll be able to judge it for yourself soon, and I know you will tell me what you really think. I've been working consistently." Six days later, I heard he still had eight sections to write and had postponed his trip to Chamounix for a week.
But though the fourth chapter yet was incomplete, he could repress no longer the desire to write to me of what he was doing (18th of July). "I think the general idea of Dombey is interesting and new, and has great material in it. But I don't like to discuss it with you till you have read number one, for fear I should spoil its effect. When done—about Wednesday or Thursday, please God—I will send it in two days' posts, seven letters each day. If you have it set at once (I am afraid you couldn't read it, otherwise than in print) I know you will impress on B. & E. the necessity of the closest secrecy. The very name getting out, would be ruinous. The points for illustration, and the enormous care required, make me excessively anxious. The man for Dombey, if Browne could see him, the class man to a T, is Sir A—— E——, of D——'s. Great pains will be necessary with Miss Tox. The Toodle family should not be too much caricatured, because of Polly. I should like Browne to think of Susan Nipper, who will not be wanted in the first number. After the second number, they will all be nine or ten years older, but this will not involve much change in the characters, except in the children and Miss Nipper. What a brilliant thing to be telling you all these names so familiarly, when you know nothing about 'em! I quite enjoy it. By the bye, I hope you may like the introduction[251] of Solomon Gills.[121] I think he lives in a good sort of house. . . . One word more. What do you think, as a name for the Christmas book, of The Battle of Life? It is not a name I have conned at all, but has just occurred to me in connection with that foggy idea. If I can see my way, I think I will take it next, and clear it off. If you knew how it hangs about me, I am sure you would say so too. It would be an immense relief to have it done, and nothing standing in the way of Dombey."
But even though the fourth chapter wasn’t finished, he couldn’t hold back the urge to write to me about what he was doing (July 18th). “I think the main idea of Dombey is interesting and fresh, and has a lot of potential. But I don’t want to talk about it with you until you’ve read the first one, in case I ruin its impact. Once it’s done—around Wednesday or Thursday, hopefully—I’ll send it in two days’ worth of posts, seven letters each day. If you can read it right away (I’m worried you wouldn’t be able to read it any other way), I know you’ll emphasize to B. & E. the need for complete secrecy. Even the name getting out would be disastrous. The aspects needing illustration and the massive effort required make me really anxious. The person for Dombey, if Browne could see him, is a perfect fit, Sir A—— E——, of D——'s. I’ll need to be very careful with Miss Tox. The Toodle family shouldn’t be exaggerated too much because of Polly. I’d like Browne to think about Susan Nipper, who won’t be needed in the first installment. After the second part, they’ll all be nine or ten years older, but this won’t change the characters much, except for the children and Miss Nipper. It’s quite amusing to share all these names so casually when you don’t know anything about them! I really enjoy it. By the way, I hope you like the introduction of Solomon Gills.[251][121] I think he lives in a decent house... One more thing. What do you think of the name The Struggle of Life for the Christmas book? It’s not a name I’ve considered much, but it just came to me in connection with that vague idea. If I can figure it out, I think I’ll take it next and get it done. If you knew how it’s been on my mind, I’m sure you’d agree. It would be such a relief to have it finished, with nothing getting in the way of Dombey.”
Within the time left for it the opening number was done, but two little incidents preceded still the trip to Chamounix. The first was a visit from Hallam to Mr. Haldimand. "Heavens! how Hallam did talk yesterday! I don't think I ever saw him so tremendous. Very good-natured and pleasant, in his way, but Good Heavens! how he did talk. That famous day you and I remember was nothing to it. His son was with him, and his daughter (who has an impediment in her speech, as if nature were determined to balance that faculty in the family), and his niece, a pretty woman, the wife of a clergyman and a friend of Thackeray's. It strikes me that she must be 'the little woman' he proposed to take us to drink tea with, once, in Golden-square. Don't you remember? His great favourite? She is quite a charming person anyhow." I hope to be pardoned for preserving an opinion which more familiar later acquaintance confirmed, and which can hardly now give anything but pleasure to the lady of[252] whom it is expressed. To the second incident he alludes more briefly. "As Haldimand and Mrs. Marcet and the Cerjats had devised a small mountain expedition for us for to-morrow, I didn't like to allow Chamounix to stand in the way. So we go with them first, and start on our own account on Tuesday. We are extremely pleasant with these people." The close of the same letter (25th of July), mentioning two pieces of local news, gives intimation of the dangers incident to all Swiss travelling, and of such special precautions as were necessary for the holiday among the mountains he was now about to take. "My first news is that a crocodile is said to have escaped from the Zoological gardens at Geneva, and to be now 'zigzag-zigging' about the lake. But I can't make out whether this is a great fact, or whether it is a pious fraud to prevent too much bathing and liability to accidents. The other piece of news is more serious. An English family whose name I don't know, consisting of a father, mother, and daughter, arrived at the hotel Gibbon here last Monday, and started off on some mountain expedition in one of the carriages of the country. It was a mere track, the road, and ought to have been travelled only by mules, but the Englishman persisted (as Englishmen do) in going on in the carriage; and in answer to all the representations of the driver that no carriage had ever gone up there, said he needn't be afraid he wasn't going to be paid for it, and so forth. Accordingly, the coachman got down and walked by the horses' heads. It was fiery hot; and, after much tugging and rearing, the horses began to back, and went down bodily, carriage and all, into a deep ravine.[253] The mother was killed on the spot; and the father and daughter are lying at some house hard by, not expected to recover."
During the remaining time, the opening number was completed, but there were still a couple of little events before the trip to Chamounix. The first was a visit from Hallam to Mr. Haldimand. "Wow! Hallam really talked a lot yesterday! I don't think I've ever seen him so intense. He was very kind and pleasant in his way, but goodness! he just wouldn't stop talking. That famous day you and I remember was nothing compared to this. His son was with him, along with his daughter (who has a speech impediment, as if nature was trying to balance things out in the family), and his niece, a pretty woman who is married to a clergyman and is friends with Thackeray. I think she must be 'the little woman' he once mentioned taking us to have tea with in Golden Square. Don’t you remember? His favorite? She’s quite a lovely person, anyway." I hope I'm forgiven for holding onto an opinion that later became even clearer with familiarity, one that should now only bring joy to the lady to whom it is directed. He briefly mentions the second incident: "Since Haldimand, Mrs. Marcet, and the Cerjats have planned a little mountain trip for us tomorrow, I didn’t want to let Chamounix interfere. So we’ll go with them first and set out on our own on Tuesday. We get along extremely well with these people." The end of the same letter (July 25th), which mentions two pieces of local news, hints at the dangers of traveling in Switzerland and the specific precautions needed for the holiday in the mountains he's about to take. "My first piece of news is that a crocodile is rumored to have escaped from the Geneva Zoo and is now 'zigzag-zigging' around the lake. But I can’t tell if this is a big deal or just a clever trick to deter too much swimming and keep people safe. The other news is more serious. An English family, whose name I don't know, consisting of a father, mother, and daughter, arrived at the hotel Gibbon here last Monday and set off on some mountain adventure in one of the local carriages. It was just a narrow pathway that should have only been traversed by mules, but the Englishman insisted (as they often do) on continuing in the carriage. Despite the driver’s warnings that no carriage had ever gone that way, he said not to worry about payment and so forth. So, the coachman got down and walked alongside the horses. It was blazing hot, and after a lot of struggling, the horses started to back up and plunged the whole carriage down into a deep ravine. The mother was killed instantly, and the father and daughter are lying at a nearby house, not expected to recover."
His next letter (written on the second of August) described his own first real experience of mountain-travel. "I begin my letter to-night, but only begin, for we returned from Chamounix in time for dinner just now, and are pretty considerably done up. We went by a mountain pass not often crossed by ladies, called the Col de Balme, where your imagination may picture Kate and Georgy on mules for ten hours at a stretch, riding up and down the most frightful precipices. We returned by the pass of the Tête Noire, which Talfourd knows, and which is of a different character, but astonishingly fine too. Mont Blanc, and the Valley of Chamounix, and the Mer de Glace, and all the wonders of that most wonderful place, are above and beyond one's wildest expectations. I cannot imagine anything in nature more stupendous or sublime. If I were to write about it now, I should quite rave—such prodigious impressions are rampant within me. . . . You may suppose that the mule-travelling is pretty primitive. Each person takes a carpet-bag strapped on the mule behind himself or herself: and that is all the baggage that can be carried. A guide, a thorough-bred mountaineer, walks all the way, leading the lady's mule; I say the lady's par excellence, in compliment to Kate; and all the rest struggle on as they please. The cavalcade stops at a lone hut for an hour and a half in the middle of the day, and lunches brilliantly on whatever it can get. Going by that Col de Balme pass, you climb up and up and up for five hours and[254] more, and look—from a mere unguarded ledge of path on the side of the precipice—into such awful valleys, that at last you are firm in the belief that you have got above everything in the world, and that there can be nothing earthly overhead. Just as you arrive at this conclusion, a different (and oh Heaven! what a free and wonderful) air comes blowing on your face; you cross a ridge of snow; and lying before you (wholly unseen till then), towering up into the distant sky, is the vast range of Mont Blanc, with attendant mountains diminished by its majestic side into mere dwarfs tapering up into innumerable rude Gothic pinnacles; deserts of ice and snow; forests of firs on mountain sides, of no account at all in the enormous scene; villages down in the hollow, that you can shut out with a finger; waterfalls, avalanches, pyramids and towers of ice, torrents, bridges; mountain upon mountain until the very sky is blocked away, and you must look up, overhead, to see it. Good God, what a country Switzerland is, and what a concentration of it is to be beheld from that one spot! And (think of this in Whitefriars and in Lincoln's-inn!) at noon on the second day from here, the first day being but half a one by the bye and full of uncommon beauty, you lie down on that ridge and see it all! . . . I think I must go back again (whether you come or not!) and see it again before the bad weather arrives. We have had sunlight, moonlight, a perfectly transparent atmosphere with not a cloud, and the grand plateau on the very summit of Mont Blanc so clear by day and night that it was difficult to believe in intervening chasms and precipices, and almost impossible to resist the idea[255] that one might sally forth and climb up easily. I went into all sorts of places; armed with a great pole with a spike at the end of it, like a leaping-pole, and with pointed irons buckled on to my shoes; and am all but knocked up. I was very anxious to make the expedition to what is called 'The Garden:' a green spot covered with wild flowers, lying across the Mer de Glace, and among the most awful mountains: but I could find no Englishman at the hotels who was similarly disposed, and the Brave wouldn't go. No sir! He gave in point blank (having been horribly blown in a climbing excursion the day before), and couldn't stand it. He is too heavy for such work, unquestionably.[122] In all other respects, I think he has exceeded himself on this journey; and if you could have seen him riding a very small mule, up a road exactly like the broken stairs of Rochester-castle; with a brandy bottle slung over his shoulder, a small pie in his hat, a roast fowl looking out of his pocket, and a mountain staff of six feet long carried cross-wise on the saddle before him; you'd have said so. He was (next to me) the admiration of Chamounix, but he utterly quenched me on the road."
His next letter (written on August 2) described his first real experience of mountain travel. "I’m starting my letter tonight, but just starting, since we got back from Chamonix just in time for dinner, and we are pretty worn out. We took a mountain pass not usually crossed by ladies, called the Col de Balme, where you can imagine Kate and Georgy on mules for ten hours straight, riding up and down the scariest cliffs. We came back via the Tête Noire pass, which Talfourd knows, and while it's different, it’s astonishingly beautiful too. Mont Blanc, the Valley of Chamonix, the Mer de Glace, and all the wonders of that incredible place surpass anything you could imagine. I can't think of anything in nature more stunning or awe-inspiring. If I were to write about it now, I’d be completely overwhelmed—such huge impressions are racing through me... You can probably guess that mule travel is pretty basic. Each person takes a carpet bag strapped on the mule behind them, and that's all the luggage allowed. A guide, a real mountaineer, walks the whole way, leading the lady's mule; I say the lady's in honor of Kate, while everyone else struggles along however they can. The group stops at a lonely hut for an hour and a half in the middle of the day and has a great lunch on whatever they can find. Going along that Col de Balme pass, you climb higher and higher for over five hours, staring from an unguarded ledge on the cliff into such terrifying valleys that you start to believe you've reached the top of everything in the world, and that nothing earthly is above you. Just as you come to this conclusion, a different (and oh, what a fresh and wonderful) breeze blows against your face; you cross a snowy ridge; and lying before you (completely unseen until then), rising into the distant sky, is the vast Mont Blanc range, with smaller mountains dwarfed by its grandeur tapering into countless rough Gothic spires; deserts of ice and snow; forests of firs on the mountainsides that don’t matter at all in the enormous scene; villages down in the valley that you can block out with a finger; waterfalls, avalanches, pyramids and towers of ice, torrents, bridges; mountain upon mountain until the sky is barely visible above, forcing you to look up to see it. Goodness, what a country Switzerland is, and what a concentration of beauty there is to be seen from that one spot! And (think of this in Whitefriars and in Lincoln's Inn!) at noon on the second day from here, the first day being just half of one but filled with rare beauty, you can lie down on that ridge and see it all!... I think I have to go back again (whether you come or not!) and see it all again before the bad weather arrives. We’ve had sunshine, moonlight, a perfectly clear atmosphere without a cloud, and the grand plateau at the very top of Mont Blanc so clear day and night that it felt hard to believe in the gaps and cliffs below, and almost impossible to shake the thought that you could just head out and climb up easily. I explored all sorts of places; armed with a long pole with a spike on the end like a leaping pole, and with metal spikes strapped to my shoes; and I'm almost worn out. I was really eager to make the expedition to what’s called 'The Garden': a green spot filled with wildflowers, lying across the Mer de Glace, and set among the most terrifying mountains; but I couldn’t find any Englishman at the hotels who wanted to join me, and the Brave wouldn't go. No, sir! He flat out refused (having been exhausted after a climbing trip the day before) and couldn’t handle it. He’s definitely too heavy for such work.[122] In every other way, I think he’s really excelled himself on this trip; and if you could have seen him riding a very small mule, up a road just like the broken stairs of Rochester Castle; with a brandy bottle slung over his shoulder, a small pie in his hat, a roast chicken peeking out of his pocket, and a six-foot-long mountain staff carried crosswise on the saddle before him; you would have agreed. He was (after me) the center of attention in Chamonix, but he completely overshadowed me on the way."
On the road as they returned there had been a small adventure, the day before this letter was written. Dickens was jingling slowly up the Tête Noire pass (his mule having thirty-seven bells on its head), riding at the moment quite alone, when—"an Englishman came bolting out of a little châlet in a most inaccessible and[256] extraordinary place, and said with great glee 'There has been an accident here sir!' I had been thinking of anything else you please; and, having no reason to suppose him an Englishman except his language, which went for nothing in the confusion, stammered out a reply in French and stared at him, in a very damp shirt and trowsers, as he stared at me in a similar costume. On his repeating the announcement, I began to have a glimmering of common sense; and so arrived at a knowledge of the fact that a German lady had been thrown from her mule and had broken her leg, at a short distance off, and had found her way in great pain to that cottage, where the Englishman, a Prussian, and a Frenchman, had presently come up; and the Frenchman, by extraordinary good fortune, was a surgeon! They were all from Chamounix, and the three latter were walking in company. It was quite charming to see how attentive they were. The lady was from Lausanne; where she had come from Frankfort to make excursions with her two boys, who are at the college here, during the vacation. She had no other attendants, and the boys were crying and very frightened. The Englishman was in the full glee of having just cut up one white dress, two chemises, and three pocket handkerchiefs, for bandages; the Frenchman had set the leg skilfully; the Prussian had scoured a neighboring wood for some men to carry her forward; and they were all at it, behind the hut, making a sort of handbarrow on which to bear her. When it was constructed, she was strapped upon it; had her poor head covered over with a handkerchief, and was carried away; and we all went on in company: Kate and[257] Georgy consoling and tending the sufferer, who was very cheerful, but had lost her husband only a year." With the same delightful observation, and missing no touch of kindly character that might give each actor his place in the little scene, the sequel is described; but it does not need to add more. It was hoped that by means of relays of men at Martigny the poor lady might have been carried on some twenty miles, in the cooler evening, to the head of the lake, and so have been got into the steamer; but she was too exhausted to be borne beyond the inn, and there she had to remain until joined by relatives from Frankfort.
On their way back, there was a little adventure the day before this letter was written. Dickens was making his way slowly up the Tête Noire pass (his mule had thirty-seven bells on its head), riding alone at the time when an Englishman suddenly burst out of a small chalet in a really inaccessible and extraordinary spot and exclaimed with great excitement, "There’s been an accident here, sir!" I had been deep in thought about other things, and since I had no reason to think of him as an Englishman beyond his language—which got lost in the confusion—I stammered out a reply in French and stared at him in a very damp shirt and trousers, as he stared back at me in a similar outfit. When he repeated the news, I started to gain a bit of common sense; and I realized that a German woman had fallen off her mule and broken her leg not far away, and had made her way in great pain to that cottage, where the Englishman, a Prussian, and a Frenchman had recently arrived; and by an extraordinary stroke of luck, the Frenchman was a surgeon! They all came from Chamounix and the other three were walking together. It was lovely to see how attentive they were. The lady was from Lausanne; she had traveled from Frankfurt to take trips with her two boys, who are in college here, during the break. She had no other helpers, and the boys were crying and very scared. The Englishman was happily in the midst of cutting up one white dress, two chemises, and three pocket handkerchiefs to use as bandages; the Frenchman had skillfully set the leg; the Prussian had gone into a nearby woods to find some men to carry her; and they were all busy, behind the hut, making a kind of handbarrow to transport her. Once it was ready, she was strapped onto it, her poor head was covered with a handkerchief, and she was carried off; we all continued together: Kate and Georgy comforted and tended to the sufferer, who was quite cheerful, despite having lost her husband just a year ago. With the same delightful observation, capturing every detail of kindness that gave each participant their role in this little scene, the continuation is described, but it doesn’t need to add more. It was hoped that with a relay of men at Martigny, the poor lady might be carried some twenty miles, in the cooler evening, to the head of the lake, and then onto the steamer; but she was too exhausted to be taken beyond the inn, and there she had to wait for relatives from Frankfurt to join her.
A few days' rest after his return were interposed, before he began his second number; and until the latter has been completed, and the Christmas story taken in hand, I do not admit the reader to his full confidences about his writing. But there were other subjects that amused and engaged him up to that date, as well when he was idle as when again he was at work, to which expression so full of character is given in his letters that they properly find mention here.
A few days of rest after his return passed before he started on his second piece, and until that's finished and the Christmas story is underway, I won't share his full thoughts on his writing with the reader. However, there were other topics that intrigued and occupied him up to that point, both when he was idle and when he was working again, which are expressed with so much character in his letters that they deserve a mention here.
Between the second and the ninth of August he went down one evening to the lake, five minutes after sunset, when the sky was covered with sullen black clouds reflected in the deep water, and saw the Castle of Chillon. He thought it the best deserving and least exaggerated in repute, of all the places he had seen. "The insupportable solitude and dreariness of the white walls and towers, the sluggish moat and drawbridge, and the lonely ramparts, I never saw the like of. But there is a court-yard inside; surrounded by prisons, oubliettes, and old chambers of torture; so[258] terrifically sad, that death itself is not more sorrowful. And oh! a wicked old Grand Duke's bedchamber upstairs in the tower, with a secret staircase down into the chapel, where the bats were wheeling about; and Bonnivard's dungeon; and a horrible trap whence prisoners were cast out into the lake; and a stake all burnt and crackled up, that still stands in the torture-ante-chamber to the saloon of justice (!)—what tremendous places! Good God, the greatest mystery in all the earth, to me, is how or why the world was tolerated by its Creator through the good old times, and wasn't dashed to fragments."
Between the second and ninth of August, he went down to the lake one evening, just five minutes after sunset, when the sky was dark with heavy black clouds reflected in the still water, and saw the Castle of Chillon. He considered it the most deserving and least exaggerated place he had seen. "The unbearable solitude and bleakness of the white walls and towers, the sluggish moat and drawbridge, and the lonely ramparts are unlike anything I’ve ever seen. But inside, there’s a courtyard surrounded by prisons, oubliettes, and old torture chambers; it's so hauntingly sad that even death doesn’t seem more sorrowful. And oh! An old Grand Duke's bedroom upstairs in the tower, with a secret staircase down to the chapel, where bats are flying around; and Bonnivard's dungeon; and a terrifying trapdoor that drops prisoners into the lake; and a stake all burned and charred, still standing in the torture ante-chamber to the courtroom—what incredible places! Good God, the greatest mystery in the world, to me, is how or why the Creator tolerated the world through those old times without destroying it."
On the ninth of August he wrote to me that there was to be a prodigious fête that day in Lausanne, in honour of the first anniversary of the proclamation of the New Constitution:[123] "beginning at sunrise with the firing of great guns, and twice two thousand rounds of rifles by two thousand men; proceeding at eleven o'clock with a great service, and some speechifying, in the church; and ending to-night with a great ball in the public promenade, and a general illumination of the town." The authorities had invited him to a place of honour in the ceremony; and though he did not go ("having been up till three o'clock in the morning, and being fast asleep at the appointed time"), the reply that sent[259] his thanks expressed also his sympathy. He was the readier with this from having discovered, in the "old" or "gentlemanly" party of the place ("including of course the sprinkling of English who are always tory, hang 'em!"), so wonderfully sore a feeling about the revolution thus celebrated, that to avoid its fête the majority had gone off by steamer the day before, and those who remained were prophesying assaults on the unilluminated houses, and other excesses. Dickens had no faith in such predictions. "The people are as perfectly good tempered and quiet always, as people can be. I don't know what the last Government may have been, but they seem to me to do very well with this, and to be rationally and cheaply provided for. If you believed what the discontented assert, you wouldn't believe in one solitary man or woman with a grain of goodness or civility. I find nothing but civility; and I walk about in all sorts of out-of-the-way places, where they live rough lives enough, in solitary cottages." The issue was told in two postscripts to his letter, and showed him to be so far right. "P.S. 6 o'clock afternoon. The fête going on, in great force. Not one of 'the old party' to be seen. I went down with one to the ground before dinner, and nothing would induce him to go within the barrier with me. Yet what they call a revolution was nothing but a change of government. Thirty-six thousand people, in this small canton, petitioned against the Jesuits—God knows with good reason. The Government chose to call them 'a mob.' So, to prove that they were not, they turned the Government out. I honour them for it. They are a genuine people, these Swiss. There is better metal in them than in all the[260] stars and stripes of all the fustian banners of the so-called, and falsely called, U-nited States. They are a thorn in the sides of European despots, and a good wholesome people to live near Jesuit-ridden Kings on the brighter side of the mountains." "P.P.S. August 10th. . . . The fête went off as quietly as I supposed it would; and they danced all night."
On August 9th, he wrote to me that there was going to be a huge celebration that day in Lausanne, to honor the first anniversary of the New Constitution: [123] "starting at sunrise with the firing of cannons, and two thousand rounds of rifles fired by two thousand men; continuing at 11 o'clock with a big service and some speeches in the church; and ending tonight with a grand ball in the public promenade, along with the entire town being illuminated." The authorities had invited him to a place of honor at the ceremony; and although he didn’t attend ("having been up until three in the morning, and being fast asleep at the time"), his response expressing thanks also conveyed his sympathy. He was especially quick to show this sympathy after discovering that the “old” or “gentlemanly” party in town (“including, of course, the usual sprinkling of English who are always Tory, damn them!”) felt so strongly against the revolution being celebrated that most of them had left the day before by steamer to avoid the fête, and those who stayed behind were predicting attacks on the unlit houses and other disturbances. Dickens didn’t believe these predictions. "The people are always perfectly good-natured and calm, as good as people can be. I don’t know what the last Government was like, but they seem to be doing very well with this one, and to be provided for in a rational and cost-effective way. If you believed what the disgruntled claim, you wouldn’t believe there’s a single man or woman with even a bit of goodness or politeness. I find nothing but civility; and I walk around in all sorts of remote places, where they live pretty tough lives in their solitary cottages." The matter was summarized in two postscripts to his letter, showing he was mostly correct. "P.S. 6 o’clock in the afternoon. The fête is going on strong. Not one of ‘the old party’ to be seen. I went down to the grounds with one of them before dinner, and nothing would persuade him to go inside the barrier with me. Yet what they call a revolution was nothing more than a change of government. Thirty-six thousand people in this small canton petitioned against the Jesuits—God knows for good reasons. The Government chose to label them 'a mob.' So, to prove they weren’t, they ousted the Government. I respect them for it. They are genuine people, these Swiss. They have more character in them than all the stars and stripes of all the pretentious banners of the so-called, and wrongly named, United States. They are a thorn in the sides of European despots, and a good, wholesome people to live near Jesuit-controlled kings on the brighter side of the mountains." "P.P.S. August 10th... The fête went off as quietly as I expected it would; and they danced all night."
These views had forcible illustration in a subsequent letter, where he describes a similar revolution that occurred at Geneva before he left the country; and nothing could better show his practical good sense in a matter of this kind. The description will be given shortly; and meanwhile I subjoin a comment made by him, not less worthy of attention, upon my reply to his account of the anti-Jesuit celebration at Lausanne. "I don't know whether I have mentioned before, that in the valley of the Simplon hard by here, where (at the bridge of St. Maurice, over the Rhone) this Protestant canton ends and a Catholic canton begins, you might separate two perfectly distinct and different conditions of humanity by drawing a line with your stick in the dust on the ground. On the Protestant side, neatness; cheerfulness; industry; education; continual aspiration, at least, after better things. On the Catholic side, dirt, disease, ignorance, squalor, and misery. I have so constantly observed the like of this, since I first came abroad, that I have a sad misgiving that the religion of Ireland lies as deep at the root of all its sorrows, even as English misgovernment and Tory villainy." Almost the counterpart of this remark is to be found in one of the later writings of Macaulay.
These views were clearly illustrated in a later letter where he describes a similar revolution that happened in Geneva before he left the country; and nothing could better show his practical good sense in this matter. The description will be provided shortly; in the meantime, I’ll add a comment he made, which is also worth noting, about my response to his account of the anti-Jesuit celebration in Lausanne. "I’m not sure if I’ve mentioned this before, but in the Simplon Valley nearby, where (at the St. Maurice bridge over the Rhone) a Protestant canton ends and a Catholic canton begins, you could draw a line in the dust on the ground to separate two completely distinct and different ways of life. On the Protestant side, there’s neatness, cheerfulness, hard work, education, and a constant desire for better things. On the Catholic side, there’s dirt, disease, ignorance, squalor, and misery. I’ve observed this consistently since I first came abroad, which gives me a grim feeling that the religion of Ireland is deeply rooted in all its troubles, just like English misgovernment and Tory villainy." A similar observation can be found in one of Macaulay's later writings.
CHAPTER XII.
SKETCHES CHIEFLY PERSONAL.
1846.
Some sketches from the life in his pleasantest vein now claim to be taken from the same series of letters; and I will prefix one or two less important notices, for the most part personal also, that have characteristic mention of his opinions in them.
Some sketches from his happiest moments are now said to be from the same series of letters; and I will include a couple of less significant notices, mostly personal as well, that notably reference his opinions.
Home-politics he criticized in what he wrote on the 24th of August, much in the spirit of his last excellent remark on the Protestant and Catholic cantons; having no sympathy with the course taken by the whigs in regard to Ireland after they had defeated Peel on his coercion bill, and resumed the government. "I am perfectly appalled by the hesitation and cowardice of the whigs. To bring in that arms bill, bear the brunt of the attack upon it, take out the obnoxious clauses, still retain the bill, and finally withdraw it, seems to me the meanest and most halting way of[262] going to work that ever was taken. I cannot believe in them. Lord John must be helpless among them. They seem somehow or other never to know what cards they hold in their hands, and to play them out blindfold. The contrast with Peel (as he was last) is, I agree with you, certainly not favourable. I don't believe now they ever would have carried the repeal of the corn law, if they could." Referring in the same letter[124] to the reluctance of public men of all parties to give the needful help to schemes of emigration, he ascribed it to a secret belief "in the gentle politico-economical principle that a surplus population must and ought to starve;" in which for himself he never could see anything but disaster for all who trusted to it. "I am convinced that its philosophers would sink any government, any cause, any doctrine, even the most righteous. There is a sense and humanity in the mass, in the long run, that will not bear them; and they will wreck their friends always, as they wrecked them in the working of the Poor-law-bill. Not all the figures that Babbage's calculating machine could turn up in twenty generations, would stand in the long run against the general heart."
He criticized domestic politics in his writing on August 24th, much in the vein of his last insightful comment on the Protestant and Catholic regions; he had no sympathy for the whigs’ approach to Ireland after they defeated Peel on his coercion bill and took over the government. "I'm completely shocked by the whigs' hesitation and cowardice. To introduce that arms bill, face the backlash against it, remove the controversial clauses, keep the bill, and then ultimately withdraw it seems to me like the weakest and most uncertain way to proceed that has ever been taken. I can't believe in them. Lord John must feel powerless among them. They never seem to know what cards they’re holding and play them blindfolded. The comparison with Peel (as he was at the end) is, I agree, definitely not favorable. I now don't think they ever would have succeeded in repealing the corn law, even if they could." Referring in the same letter to the hesitance of public figures from all parties to provide the necessary support for emigration plans, he attributed it to a hidden belief "in the gentle politico-economic principle that a surplus population must and ought to starve;" which he personally saw as nothing but a recipe for disaster for anyone who relied on it. "I’m convinced that its proponents would destroy any government, any cause, any doctrine, even the most just. There’s a sense of humanity in the masses, in the long run, that will not tolerate them; and they will consistently ruin their allies, just as they did during the implementation of the Poor Law Bill. Not even all the data that Babbage's calculating machine could generate in twenty generations would hold out in the long run against the collective heart."
Of other topics in his letters, one or two have the additional attractiveness derivable from touches of personal interest when these may with propriety be printed. Hardly within the class might have fallen a mention of Mark Lemon, of whom our recent play, and his dramatic adaptation of the Chimes, had given him pleasant experiences, if I felt less strongly not only that its publication would have been gladly sanctioned by the subject of it, but that it will not now displease another to whom also it refers, herself the member of a family in various ways distinguished on the stage, and to whom, since her husband's death, well-merited sympathy and respect have been paid. "After turning Mrs. Lemon's portrait over, in my mind, I am convinced that there is not a grain of bad taste in the matter, and that there is a manly composure and courage in the proceeding deserving of the utmost respect. If Lemon were one of your braggart honest men, he would set a taint of bad taste upon that action as upon everything else he might say or do; but being what he is, I admire him for it greatly, and hold it to be a proof of an exalted nature and a true heart. Your idea of him, is mine. I am sure he is an excellent fellow. We talk about not liking such and such a man because he doesn't look one in the face,—but how much we should esteem a man who looks the world in the face, composedly, and neither shirks it nor bullies it. Between ourselves, I say with shame and self-reproach that I am quite sure if Kate had been a Columbine her portrait would not be hanging, 'in character,' in Devonshire-terrace."
In his letters, a few topics stand out with a personal touch that makes them interesting enough to be shared. One such mention could be Mark Lemon, who had some enjoyable experiences thanks to our recent play and his dramatic adaptation of the Chimes. I strongly believe that sharing this would have been welcomed by him, and it shouldn't upset another person mentioned here, who comes from a family notable in the theater and has received well-deserved sympathy and respect since her husband's passing. "After considering Mrs. Lemon's portrait in my mind, I'm convinced there's nothing in bad taste here. There's a noble calmness and bravery in this action that deserves the utmost respect. If Lemon were one of those boastful honest men, he would spoil that moment just like everything else he says or does; but since he is who he is, I truly admire him for it, and I see it as a sign of a noble character and a sincere heart. Your view of him matches mine. I'm sure he's a great guy. We often criticize someone for not meeting our gaze, but how much should we value a person who faces the world calmly and neither hides from it nor intimidates it? Honestly, I feel ashamed to admit that if Kate had been a Columbine, her portrait wouldn't be hanging, 'in character,' in Devonshire-terrace."
He speaks thus of a novel by Hood. "I have[264] been reading poor Hood's Tylney Hall; the most extraordinary jumble of impossible extravagance, and especial cleverness, I ever saw. The man drawn to the life from the pirate-bookseller, is wonderfully good; and his recommendation to a reduced gentleman from the university, to rise from nothing as he, the pirate, did, and go round to the churches and see whether there's an opening, and begin by being a beadle, is one of the finest things I ever read, in its way." The same letter has a gentle little trait of the great duke, touching in its simplicity, and worth preserving. "I had a letter from Tagart the day before yesterday, with a curious little anecdote of the Duke of Wellington in it. They have had a small cottage at Walmer; and one day—the other day only—the old man met their little daughter Lucy, a child about Mamey's age, near the garden; and having kissed her, and asked her what was her name, and who and what her parents were, tied a small silver medal round her neck with a bit of pink ribbon, and asked the child to keep it in remembrance of him. There is something good, and aged, and odd in it. Is there not?"
He talks about a novel by Hood. "I have[264] been reading poor Hood's Tylney Hall; it's the most incredible mix of ridiculous extravagance and genuine cleverness I've ever seen. The character based on the pirate-bookseller is really well done; and his advice to a struggling gentleman from the university to rise from nothing like he did, the pirate, and go around to the churches to see if there’s a job opening, starting as a beadle, is one of the best things I've ever read, in its own way." The same letter includes a sweet little detail about the great duke that’s touching in its simplicity and worth keeping. "I got a letter from Tagart the day before yesterday, featuring a cute little story about the Duke of Wellington. They have a small cottage at Walmer, and one day—just recently—the old man met their little daughter Lucy, a child about Mamey's age, near the garden. After kissing her and asking for her name and who her parents were, he tied a small silver medal around her neck with a piece of pink ribbon and asked her to keep it as a reminder of him. There’s something lovely, aged, and quirky about it. Don’t you think?”
Another of his personal references was to Lord Grey, to whose style of speaking and general character of mind he had always a strongly-expressed dislike, drawn not impartially or quite justly from the days of reaction that followed the reform debates, when the whig leader's least attractive traits were presented to the young reporter. "He is a very intelligent agreeable fellow, the said Watson by the bye" (he is speaking of the member of the Lausanne circle with whom he established friendliest after-intercourse); "he sat for[265] Northamptonshire in the reform bill time, and is high sheriff of his county and all the rest of it; but has not the least nonsense about him, and is a thorough good liberal. He has a charming wife, who draws well, and is making a sketch of Rosemont for us that shall be yours in Paris." (It is already, by permission of its present possessor, the reader's, and all the world's who may take interest in the little doll's house of Lausanne which lodged so illustrious a tenant.) "He was giving me some good recollections of Lord Grey the other evening when we were playing at battledore (old Lord Grey I mean), and of the constitutional impossibility he and Lord Lansdowne and the rest laboured under, of ever personally attaching a single young man, in all the excitement of that exciting time, to the leaders of the party. It was quite a delight to me, as I listened, to recall my own dislike of his style of speaking, his fishy coldness, his uncongenial and unsympathetic politeness, and his insufferable though most gentlemanly artificiality. The shape of his head (I see it now) was misery to me, and weighed down my youth. . . ."
Another of his personal references was to Lord Grey, whose way of speaking and general mindset he had always strongly disliked, not impartially or quite fairly, stemming from the days of reaction that followed the reform debates, when the least appealing traits of the Whig leader were showcased to the young reporter. "He is a very intelligent, agreeable guy," said Watson, by the way (he's talking about the member of the Lausanne circle with whom he developed a friendly relationship afterwards); "he represented Northamptonshire during the reform bill period and is the high sheriff of his county, and all that; but he has no nonsense about him and is a true liberal. He has a lovely wife who draws well and is creating a sketch of Rosemont for us that will be yours in Paris." (It is already, with permission from its current owner, yours, and all the world's who might take an interest in the little doll's house of Lausanne that housed such an illustrious tenant.) "He was sharing some good memories of Lord Grey (I mean the old Lord Grey) the other evening when we were playing battledore, and of the constitutional impossibility that he, Lord Lansdowne, and the others faced in ever personally connecting a single young man, amidst all the excitement of that thrilling time, to the party leaders. It was quite a delight for me to listen and recall my own dislike of his speaking style, his cold demeanor, his unfriendly and unsympathetic politeness, and his unbearable though very gentlemanly artificiality. The shape of his head (I see it now) was distressing to me and weighed down my youth. . . ."
It was now the opening of the second week in August; and before he finally addressed himself to the second number of Dombey, he had again turned a lingering look in the direction of his Christmas book. "It would be such a great relief to me to get that small story out of the way." Wisely, however, again he refrained, and went on with Dombey; at which he had been working for a little time when he described to me (24th of August) a visit from two English travellers,[266] of one of whom with the slightest possible touch he gives a speaking likeness.[125]
It was now the start of the second week in August, and before he finally got to work on the second part of Dombey, he took another long look at his Christmas book. "It would be such a relief to get that small story done." However, he wisely held back again and continued with Dombey; he had been working on it for a little while when he told me (August 24th) about a visit from two English travelers, one of whom he captured with just the slightest touch. [266] [125]
"Not having your letter as usual, I sat down to write to you on speculation yesterday, but lapsed in my uncertainty into Dombey, and worked at it all day. It was, as it has been since last Tuesday morning, incessantly raining regular mountain rain. After dinner, at a little after seven o'clock, I was walking up and down under the little colonnade in the garden, racking my brain about Dombeys and Battles of Lives, when two travel-stained-looking men approached, of whom one, in a very limp and melancholy straw hat, ducked, perpetually to me as he came up the walk. I couldn't make them out at all; and it wasn't till I got close up to them that I recognised A. and (in the straw hat) N. They had come from Geneva by the steamer, and taken[267] a scrambling dinner on board. I gave them some fine Rhine wine, and cigars innumerable. A. enjoyed himself and was quite at home. N. (an odd companion for a man of genius) was snobbish, but pleased and good-natured. A. had a five pound note in his pocket which he had worn down, by careless carrying about, to some two-thirds of its original size, and which was so ragged in its remains that when he took it out bits of it flew about the table. 'Oh Lor you know—now really—like Goldsmith you know—or any of those great men!' said N. with the very 'snatches in his voice and burst of speaking' that reminded Leigh Hunt of Cloten. . . . The clouds were lying, as they do in such weather here, on the earth, and our friends saw no more of Lake Leman than of Battersea. Nor had they, it might appear, seen more of the Mer de Glace, on their way here; their talk about it bearing much resemblance to that of the man who had been to Niagara and said it was nothing but water."
"Since I didn’t get your usual letter, I decided to write to you on a whim yesterday, but lost my focus and got absorbed in Dombey, working on it all day. It had been raining nonstop, just like it has since last Tuesday morning, with that regular mountain rain. After dinner, around seven o'clock, I was pacing under the small colonnade in the garden, trying to think about Dombeys and Battles of Lives, when two scruffy-looking guys approached. One of them, wearing a sad, floppy straw hat, kept nodding at me as he walked down the path. I couldn't figure them out at all, and it wasn’t until I got closer that I recognized A. and N. (the one in the straw hat). They had come from Geneva by steamer and grabbed a hasty dinner on board. I offered them some nice Rhine wine and plenty of cigars. A. seemed to really enjoy himself and felt right at home. N. (an odd friend for a genius) was a bit snobby but overall pleased and good-natured. A. had a five-pound note in his pocket that had been worn down to about two-thirds of its original size from being carelessly carried around, and it was so ragged that bits of it flew around the table when he pulled it out. 'Oh my, you know—really—like Goldsmith, you know—or any of those great men!' said N., with a kind of enthusiasm in his voice that reminded Leigh Hunt of Cloten. . . . The clouds were lying low, as they do in this weather, so our friends saw no more of Lake Leman than they would see of Battersea. And it seemed they hadn’t seen much more of the Mer de Glace on their way here, as their conversation about it was reminiscent of a guy who had been to Niagara and claimed it was just a lot of water."
His next letter described a day's party of the Cerjats, Watsons, and Haldimands, among the neighbouring hills, which, contrary to his custom while at work, he had been unable to resist the temptation of joining. They went to a mountain-lake twelve miles off, had dinner at the public-house on the lake, and returned home by Vevay at which they rested for tea; and where pleasant talk with Mr. Cerjat led to anecdotes of an excellent friend of ours, formerly resident at Lausanne, with which the letter closed. Our friend was a distinguished writer, and a man of many sterling fine qualities, but with a habit of occasional free indulgence in coarseness of speech, which, though his earlier life[268] had made it as easy to acquire as difficult to drop, did always less than justice to a very manly, honest, and really gentle nature. He had as much genuinely admirable stuff in him as any favourite hero of Smollett or Fielding, and I never knew anyone who reminded me of those characters so much. "It would seem, Mr. Cerjat tells me, that he was, when here, infinitely worse in his general style of conversation, than now—sermuchser, as Toodles says, that Cerjat describes himself as having always been in unspeakable agony when he was at his table, lest he should forget himself (or remember himself, as I suggested) and break out before the ladies. There happened to be living here at that time a stately English baronet and his wife, who had two milksop sons, concerning whom they cherished the idea of accomplishing their education into manhood coexistently with such perfect purity and innocence, that they were hardly to know their own sex. Accordingly, they were sent to no school or college, but had masters of all sorts at home, and thus reached eighteen years or so, in what Falstaff calls a kind of male green-sickness. At this crisis of their innocent existence, our ogre friend encountered these lambs at dinner, with their father, at Cerjat's house; and, as if possessed by a devil, launched out into such frightful and appalling impropriety—ranging over every kind of forbidden topic and every species of forbidden word and every sort of scandalous anecdote—that years of education in Newgate would have been as nothing compared with their experience of that one afternoon. After turning paler and paler, and more and more stoney, the baronet, with a half-suppressed cry, rose and fled. But the[269] sons—intent on the ogre—remained behind instead of following him; and are supposed to have been ruined from that hour. Isn't that a good story? I can see our friend and his pupils now. . . . Poor fellow! He seems to have a hard time of it with his wife. She had no interest whatever in her children; and was such a fury, that, being dressed to go out to dinner, she would sometimes, on no other provocation than a pin out of its place or some such thing, fall upon a little maid she had, beat her till she couldn't stand, then tumble into hysterics, and be carried to bed. He suffered martyrdom with her; and seems to have been himself, in all good-natured easy-going ways, just what we know him now."
His next letter described a day’s party with the Cerjats, Watsons, and Haldimands, set among the nearby hills, which, unlike his usual work routine, he couldn’t resist joining. They traveled to a mountain lake twelve miles away, had dinner at a pub by the lake, and headed home through Vevay, where they stopped for tea. A pleasant conversation with Mr. Cerjat led to stories about an excellent friend of ours who used to live in Lausanne, with which the letter concluded. Our friend was a well-respected writer and a genuinely good person, but he had a tendency to occasionally speak coarsely, a habit he picked up earlier in life that was just as easy to adopt as it was hard to break. This didn’t do justice to his strong, honest, and really gentle nature. He had as much admirable character as any favorite hero from Smollett or Fielding, and I’d never met anyone who reminded me of those characters as much as he did. "It seems, Mr. Cerjat tells me, that when he was here, his general conversation style was much worse than it is now—'sermuchser,' as Toodles would say—so much that Cerjat described himself as being in constant dread while he was at the table, fearing he might slip up (or maybe remember himself, as I suggested) and say something inappropriate in front of the ladies. At that time, there was a distinguished English baronet and his wife living here who had two overly sheltered sons, whom they believed they could raise to manhood while maintaining absolute purity and innocence, to the point where they hardly knew their own gender. So, they didn't send them to any school or college but had various tutors at home, allowing them to grow up into young men around eighteen years old, in what Falstaff would call a kind of male green-sickness. At this pivotal moment in their innocent lives, our friend the ogre encountered these naive boys at dinner with their father at Cerjat’s house. As if taken over by a wild impulse, he launched into such horrendous and shocking topics—covering every kind of taboo subject, inappropriate language, and scandalous gossip—that it would have taken years of Newgate prison to compare with their experience from that one afternoon. The baronet turned paler and paler, growing more stone-faced, before letting out a half-suppressed cry and fleeing the scene. But instead of following him, the sons—fixated on the ogre—stayed behind, and are believed to have been ruined from that moment on. Isn't that a great story? I can picture our friend and his pupils now… Poor guy! He seems to be having a tough time with his wife. She had no interest in her children at all and could be such a rage that, when dressed to go out to dinner, she would occasionally lash out at their little maid over the slightest thing, like a misplaced pin, beating her until she couldn’t stand, then collapsing into hysterics and being taken to bed. He endured a lot with her; and it seems he was, in his good-natured and easygoing way, just as we know him now.
There were at this time some fresh arrivals of travelling English at Lausanne, outside their own little circle, and among them another baronet and his family made amusing appearance. "We have another English family here, one Sir Joseph and his lady, and ten children. Sir Joseph, a large baronet something in the Graham style, with a little, loquacious, flat-faced, damaged-featured, old young wife. They are fond of society, and couldn't well have less. They delight in a view, and live in a close street at Ouchy, down among the drunken boatmen and the drays and omnibuses, where nothing whatever is to be seen but the locked wheels of carts scraping down the uneven, steep, stone pavement. The baronet plays double-dummy all day long, with an unhappy Swiss whom he has entrapped for that purpose; the baronet's lady pays visits; and the baronet's daughters play a Lausanne piano, which must be heard to be appreciated. . . ."[270]
At this time, there were some new English travelers in Lausanne, outside their usual circle, including another baronet and his family who made quite an amusing impression. "We have another English family here, Sir Joseph and his wife, along with ten children. Sir Joseph is a big baronet, somewhat in the Graham style, with a small, talkative, flat-faced, slightly unattractive, old young wife. They enjoy socializing, and could hardly do less. They love a good view, yet live on a narrow street in Ouchy, surrounded by drunken boatmen, horse-drawn carts, and buses, where there’s nothing to see except the wheels of carts scraping down the uneven, steep stone pavement. The baronet spends all day playing double-dummy with an unhappy Swiss man he has roped into it; the baronet's wife makes social visits, and the baronet's daughters play the piano in Lausanne, which really has to be heard to be appreciated. . . ."[270]
Another sketch in the same letter touches little more than the eccentricities (but all in good taste and good humour) of the subject of it, who is still gratefully remembered by English residents in Italy for his scholarly munificence, and for very valuable service conferred by it on Italian literature. "Another curious man is backwards and forwards here—a Lord Vernon,[126] who is well-informed, a great Italian scholar deep in Dante, and a very good-humoured gentleman, but who has fallen into the strange infatuation of attending every rifle-match that takes place in Switzerland, accompanied by two men who load rifles for him, one after another, which he has been frequently known to fire off, two a minute, for fourteen hours at a stretch, without once changing his position or leaving the ground. He wins all kinds of prizes; gold watches, flags, teaspoons, tea-boards, and so forth; and is constantly travelling about with them, from place to place, in an extraordinary carriage, where you touch a spring and a chair flies out, touch another spring and a bed appears, touch another spring and a closet of pickles opens, touch another spring and disclose a pantry. While Lady Vernon (said to be handsome and accomplished) is continually cutting across this or that Alpine pass in the night, to meet him on the road, for a minute or two, on one of his excursions; these being the only times at which she can catch him. The last time he saw her, was five or six months ago, when they met and supped together on the St. Gothard! It is a monomania with him, of[271] course. He is a man of some note; seconded one of Lord Melbourne's addresses; and had forty thousand a year, now reduced to ten, but nursing and improving every day. He was with us last Monday, and comes back from some out-of-the-way place to join another small picnic next Friday. As I have said, he is the very soul of good nature and cheerfulness, but one can't help being melancholy to see a man wasting his life in such a singular delusion. Isn't it odd? He knows my books very well, and seems interested in everything concerning them; being indeed accomplished in books generally, and attached to many elegant tastes."
Another sketch in the same letter touches on little more than the quirks (but all in good taste and good humor) of the subject, who is still fondly remembered by English residents in Italy for his generous contributions and invaluable service to Italian literature. "Another interesting person is around here—a Lord Vernon,[126] who is well-informed, a great Italian scholar well-versed in Dante, and a very good-natured gentleman. However, he has developed this strange obsession with attending every rifle match that happens in Switzerland, bringing along two men who load rifles for him, one after the other. He’s known to shoot off two rounds a minute for fourteen hours straight without ever changing his position or leaving the spot. He wins all kinds of prizes—gold watches, flags, teaspoons, tea trays, and so on—and constantly travels around with them in an extraordinary carriage where you touch a spring and a chair pops out, touch another spring and a bed appears, touch another spring and a cupboard with pickles opens, touch another spring and a pantry is revealed. Meanwhile, Lady Vernon (said to be beautiful and talented) is always crossing this or that Alpine pass at night to meet him on the road for just a minute or two during one of his outings; those are the only times she can catch him. The last time he saw her was five or six months ago when they met and had dinner together on the St. Gothard! It’s an obsession for him, of course. He’s a man of some note; supported one of Lord Melbourne’s addresses and had forty thousand a year, which is now down to ten but is steadily growing and improving every day. He was with us last Monday and is coming back from some out-of-the-way place to join another small picnic next Friday. As I mentioned, he is the very embodiment of good nature and cheerfulness, but it’s hard not to feel a bit sad seeing a man squandering his life on such a peculiar fixation. Isn’t it strange? He knows my books very well and seems interested in everything related to them; he’s indeed knowledgeable about books in general and has a lot of refined tastes."
But the most agreeable addition to their own special circle was referred to in his first September letter, just when he was coming to the close of his second number of Dombey. "There are two nice girls here, the Ladies Taylor, daughters of Lord Headfort. Their mother was daughter (I think) of Sir John Stevenson, and Moore dedicated one part of the Irish Melodies to her. They inherit the musical taste, and sing very well. A proposal is on foot for our all bundling off on Tuesday (16 strong) to the top of the Great St. Bernard. But the weather seems to have broken, and the autumn rains to have set in; which I devoutly hope will break up the party. It would be a most serious hindrance to me, just now; but I have rashly promised. Do you know young Romilly? He is coming over from Geneva when 'the reading' comes off, and is a fine fellow I am told. There is not a bad little theatre here; and by way of an artificial crowd, I should certainly have got it open with an amateur company, if we were not so few that the only thing we want is the audience." . . .[272] The "reading" named by him was that of his first number, which was to "come off" as soon as I could get the proofs out to him; but which the changes needful to be made, and to be mentioned hereafter, still delayed. The St. Bernard holiday, which within sight of his Christmas-book labour he would fain have thrown over, came off as proposed very fortunately for the reader, who might otherwise have lost one of his pleasantest descriptions. But before giving it, one more little sketch of character may be interposed as delicately done as anything in his writings. Steele's observation is in the outline, and Charles Lamb's humour in its touch of colouring.
But the most welcome addition to their little group was mentioned in his first September letter, just as he was finishing the second issue of Dombey. "There are two nice girls here, the Ladies Taylor, daughters of Lord Headfort. Their mother was the daughter (I think) of Sir John Stevenson, and Moore dedicated part of the Irish Melodies to her. They have inherited a love for music and sing really well. There's a plan for us all to head out on Tuesday (16 of us) to the top of the Great St. Bernard. But it looks like the weather has turned, and the autumn rains have set in; I seriously hope this will disrupt the trip. It would be a major hassle for me right now; but I've foolishly promised. Do you know young Romilly? He is coming over from Geneva when 'the reading' takes place, and I’ve heard he’s a great guy. There’s a decent little theater here; and to create some artificial excitement, I would definitely have opened it with an amateur company, if we weren’t so few that what we really need is an audience." . . .[272] The "reading" he mentioned was that of his first issue, which was to happen as soon as I could send the proofs to him; but the necessary changes, which I’ll mention later, were still holding things up. Fortunately for the reader, the St. Bernard holiday, which he would have liked to skip while focusing on his Christmas book, went ahead as planned, otherwise, they might have missed one of his most enjoyable descriptions. But before sharing it, I want to add one more small character sketch, as delicately crafted as anything in his writings. Steele's observation shows in the outline, and Charles Lamb's humor adds a nice touch.
" . . . There are two old ladies (English) living here who may serve me for a few lines of gossip—as I have intended they should, over and over again, but I have always forgotten it. There were originally four old ladies, sisters, but two of them have faded away in the course of eighteen years, and withered by the side of John Kemble in the cemetery. They are very little, and very skinny; and each of them wears a row of false curls, like little rolling-pins, so low upon her brow, that there is no forehead; nothing above the eyebrows but a deep horizontal wrinkle, and then the curls. They live upon some small annuity. For thirteen years they have wanted very much to move to Italy, as the eldest old lady says the climate of this part of Switzerland doesn't agree with her, and preys upon her spirits; but they have never been able to go, because of the difficulty of moving 'the books.' This tremendous library belonged once upon a time to the father of these old ladies, and comprises about fifty[273] volumes. I have never been able to see what they are, because one of the old ladies always sits before them; but they look, outside, like very old backgammon-boards. The two deceased sisters died in the firm persuasion that this precious property could never be got over the Simplon without some gigantic effort to which the united family was unequal. The two remaining sisters live, and will die also, in the same belief. I met the eldest (evidently drooping) yesterday, and recommended her to try Genoa. She looked shrewdly at the snow that closes up the mountain prospect just now, and said that when the spring was quite set in, and the avalanches were down, and the passes well open, she would certainly try that place, if they could devise any plan, in the course of the winter, for moving 'the books.' The whole library will be sold by auction here, when they are both dead, for about a napoleon; and some young woman will carry it home in two journeys with a basket."
"... There are two elderly ladies (British) living here who might give me a few lines of gossip—as I’ve meant to for a long time, but I always forget. There used to be four old ladies, sisters, but two of them have passed away over the last eighteen years, withered away next to John Kemble in the cemetery. They are very small and very thin; each of them sports a row of false curls, like tiny rolling pins, so low on their foreheads that there’s no forehead visible—just a deep horizontal wrinkle above the eyebrows and then the curls. They get by on a small annuity. For thirteen years, they have really wanted to move to Italy, as the oldest lady insists that the climate in this part of Switzerland doesn’t suit her and brings down her spirits; but they’ve never been able to go due to the challenge of moving ‘the books.’ This vast library used to belong to their father and consists of about fifty[273] volumes. I’ve never seen what they are because one of the ladies always sits in front of them, but they look like very old backgammon boards from the outside. The two departed sisters believed firmly that this precious property couldn’t be transported over the Simplon without some massive effort, which the family collectively couldn’t manage. The two remaining sisters live and will also die with the same belief. I met the eldest (clearly looking down) yesterday and suggested she try Genoa. She looked skeptically at the snow currently blocking the mountain view and said that once spring truly arrives, and the avalanches have settled, and the passes are clear, she would definitely consider that location if they could come up with a plan over the winter for moving ‘the books.’ The entire library will be auctioned off here when they’re both gone for about a napoleon, and some young woman will take it home in two trips with a basket."
The last letter sent me before he fell upon his self-appointed task for Christmas, contained a delightful account of the trip to the Great St. Bernard. It was dated on the sixth of September.
The last letter he sent me before he took on his self-assigned task for Christmas included a wonderful description of the trip to the Great St. Bernard. It was dated September 6th.
"The weather obstinately clearing, we started off last Tuesday for the Great St. Bernard, returning here on Friday afternoon. The party consisted of eleven people and two servants—Haldimand, Mr. and Mrs. Cerjat and one daughter, Mr. and Mrs. Watson, two Ladies Taylor, Kate, Georgy, and I. We were wonderfully unanimous and cheerful; went away from here by the steamer; found at its destination a whole omnibus provided by the Brave (who went on in advance everywhere);[274] rode therein to Bex; found two large carriages ready to take us to Martigny; slept there; and proceeded up the mountain on mules next day. Although the St. Bernard convent is, as I dare say you know, the highest inhabited spot but one in the world, the ascent is extremely gradual and uncommonly easy: really presenting no difficulties at all, until within the last league, when the ascent, lying through a place called the valley of desolation, is very awful and tremendous, and the road is rendered toilsome by scattered rocks and melting snow. The convent is a most extraordinary place, full of great vaulted passages, divided from each other with iron gratings; and presenting a series of the most astonishing little dormitories, where the windows are so small (on account of the cold and snow), that it is as much as one can do to get one's head out of them. Here we slept: supping, thirty strong, in a rambling room with a great wood-fire in it set apart for that purpose; with a grim monk, in a high black sugar-loaf hat with a great knob at the top of it, carving the dishes. At five o'clock in the morning the chapel bell rang in the dismallest way for matins: and I, lying in bed close to the chapel, and being awakened by the solemn organ and the chaunting, thought for a moment I had died in the night and passed into the unknown world.
The weather finally cleared up, so we set off last Tuesday for the Great St. Bernard, returning here on Friday afternoon. There were eleven of us plus two servants—Haldimand, Mr. and Mrs. Cerjat and their daughter, Mr. and Mrs. Watson, two Ladies Taylor, Kate, Georgy, and me. We were all in great spirits and got along well; we left here by steamer and found a whole bus waiting for us at our destination, thanks to Brave (who had gone ahead everywhere);[274] we rode that to Bex; then we had two large carriages ready to take us to Martigny; we spent the night there and headed up the mountain on mules the next day. Although the St. Bernard convent is, as you probably know, the second highest inhabited place in the world, the climb is very gradual and surprisingly easy: it really presents no challenges until the last leg, when the ascent through a place called the valley of desolation is quite daunting, and the path becomes tough due to scattered rocks and melting snow. The convent is a remarkable place, filled with grand vaulted corridors separated by iron grates, and features a series of astonishing little dormitories with such small windows (due to the cold and snow) that it's quite a struggle to get your head out of them. We slept here: having dinner with thirty people in a sprawling room with a large wood fire that was set aside for that purpose, with a solemn monk in a tall black sugar-loaf hat with a big knob on top, carving the food. At five in the morning, the chapel bell rang in the most dismal way for matins: I, lying in bed close to the chapel, was awakened by the solemn organ and chanting, and for a moment thought I had died in the night and passed into the unknown world.
"I wish to God you could see that place. A great hollow on the top of a range of dreadful mountains, fenced in by riven rocks of every shape and colour: and in the midst, a black lake, with phantom clouds perpetually stalking over it. Peaks, and points, and plains of eternal ice and snow, bounding the view, and[275] shutting out the world on every side: the lake reflecting nothing: and no human figure in the scene. The air so fine, that it is difficult to breathe without feeling out of breath; and the cold so exquisitely thin and sharp that it is not to be described. Nothing of life or living interest in the picture, but the grey dull walls of the convent. No vegetation of any sort or kind. Nothing growing, nothing stirring. Everything iron-bound, and frozen up. Beside the convent, in a little outhouse with a grated iron door which you may unbolt for yourself, are the bodies of people found in the snow who have never been claimed and are withering away—not laid down, or stretched out, but standing up, in corners and against walls; some erect and horribly human, with distinct expressions on the faces; some sunk down on their knees; some dropping over on one side; some tumbled down altogether, and presenting a heap of skulls and fibrous dust. There is no other decay in that atmosphere; and there they remain during the short days and the long nights, the only human company out of doors, withering away by grains, and holding ghastly possession of the mountain where they died.
"I wish you could see that place. A large hollow atop a range of terrifying mountains, surrounded by jagged rocks of every shape and color: and in the middle, a black lake, with ghostly clouds constantly drifting over it. Peaks, points, and plains of eternal ice and snow frame the view, shutting out the world on all sides: the lake reflecting nothing, and no human figure in sight. The air is so thin that it’s hard to breathe without feeling out of breath; and the cold is so painfully sharp that it’s hard to describe. There’s nothing alive or interesting in the scene, just the grey dull walls of the convent. No vegetation at all. Nothing growing, nothing moving. Everything feels frozen and locked away. Next to the convent, in a small outbuilding with a barred iron door that you can unbolt yourself, are the bodies of people found in the snow who have never been claimed and are slowly decaying—not lying down or sprawled out, but standing in corners and against walls; some standing upright and eerily human, with clear expressions on their faces; some sunk to their knees; some leaning over to one side; some completely toppled, creating a heap of skulls and fibrous dust. There’s no other decay in that atmosphere; and there they remain during the short days and long nights, the only human companions outside, withering away grain by grain, haunting the mountain where they died."
"It is the most distinct and individual place I have seen, even in this transcendent country. But, for the Saint Bernard holy fathers and convent in themselves, I am sorry to say that they are a piece of as sheer humbug as we ever learnt to believe in, in our young days. Trashy French sentiment and the dogs (of which, by the bye, there are only three remaining) have done it all. They are a lazy set of fellows; not over fond of going out themselves; employing servants to clear the[276] road (which has not been important or much used as a pass these hundred years); rich; and driving a good trade in Innkeeping: the convent being a common tavern in everything but the sign. No charge is made for their hospitality, to be sure; but you are shown to a box in the chapel, where everybody puts in more than could, with any show of face, be charged for the entertainment; and from this the establishment derives a right good income. As to the self-sacrifice of living up there, they are obliged to go there young, it is true, to be inured to the climate: but it is an infinitely more exciting and various life than any other convent can offer; with constant change and company through the whole summer; with a hospital for invalids down in the valley, which affords another change; and with an annual begging-journey to Geneva and this place and all the places round for one brother or other, which affords farther change. The brother who carved at our supper could speak some English, and had just had Pickwick given him!—what a humbug he will think me when he tries to understand it! If I had had any other book of mine with me, I would have given it him, that I might have had some chance of being intelligible. . . ."
"It is the most unique and personal place I have ever seen, even in this incredible country. However, as for the Saint Bernard holy fathers and their convent, I regret to say they are quite the sham we used to believe in back in our younger days. Sentimental French nonsense and the dogs—of which, by the way, only three are left—have created this illusion. They are a lazy group; not too excited about going out themselves, relying on servants to clear the [276] road (which hasn’t been important or frequently used as a pass for the last hundred years); they’re wealthy and run a successful inn: the convent is basically a tavern, except for the sign. No fee is charged for their hospitality, of course; but you’re shown to a box in the chapel, where everyone puts in more than could realistically be charged for the accommodation; this provides the place with a decent income. Regarding the supposed self-sacrifice of living up there, it’s true they have to go there young to get used to the climate, but it’s a far more exciting and varied life than any other convent can provide; with constant changes and visitors throughout the summer; with a hospital for sick people down in the valley, which offers another change; and with an annual fundraising trip to Geneva and nearby places for one brother or another, which provides even more variation. The brother who carved for our dinner spoke some English and had just received Pickwick!—what a fool he will think I am when he tries to understand it! If I had any of my other books with me, I would have given him one, hoping to have a chance of being understood. . . ."
CHAPTER XIII.
LITERARY LABOUR AT LAUSANNE.
1846.
Something of the other side of the medal has now to be presented. His letters enable us to see him amid his troubles and difficulties of writing, as faithfully as in his leisure and enjoyments; and when, to the picture thus given of Dickens's home life in Switzerland, some account has been added of the vicissitudes of literary labour undergone in the interval, as complete a representation of the man will be afforded as could be taken from any period of his career. Of the larger life whereof it is part, the Lausanne life is indeed a perfect microcosm, wanting only the London streets. This was his chief present want, as will shortly be perceived: but as yet the reader does not feel it, and he sees otherwise in all respects at his best the great observer and humourist; interested in everything that commended itself to a thoroughly earnest and[278] eagerly enquiring nature; popular beyond measure with all having intercourse with him; the centre, and very soul, of social enjoyment; letting nothing escape a vision that was not more keen than kindly; and even when apparently most idle, never idle in the sense of his art, but adding day by day to experiences that widened its range, and gave freer and healthier play to an imagination always busily at work, alert and active in a singular degree, and that seemed to be quite untiring. At his heart there was a genuine love of nature at all times; and strange as it may seem to connect this with such forms of humorous delineation as are most identified with his genius, it is yet the literal truth that the impressions of this noble Swiss scenery were with him during the work of many subsequent years: a present and actual, though it might be seldom a directly conscious, influence. When he said afterwards, that, while writing the book on which he is now engaged, he had not seen less clearly each step of the wooden midshipman's staircase, each pew of the church in which Florence was married, or each bed in the dormitory of Doctor Blimber's establishment, because he was himself at the time by the lake of Geneva, he might as truly have said that he saw them all the more clearly even because of that circumstance. He worked his humour to its greatest results by the freedom and force of his imagination; and while the smallest or commonest objects around him were food for the one, the other might have pined or perished without additional higher aliment. Dickens had little love for Wordsworth, but he was himself an example of the truth the great poet never tired of enforcing, that[279] Nature has subtle helps for all who are admitted to become free of her wonders and mysteries.
Another aspect of the situation needs to be discussed now. His letters allow us to see him in the midst of his struggles and challenges with writing, just as clearly as during his times of relaxation and enjoyment. When we add details about the ups and downs of the literary work he faced during this time to the depiction of Dickens's family life in Switzerland, we get as complete a picture of him as we could from any phase of his career. The life he lived in Lausanne is indeed a perfect reflection of his larger existence, missing only the streets of London. This was his main present desire, which will soon become clear, but for now, the reader does not sense this absence and instead sees the great observer and humorist at his finest; he was interested in everything that engaged his genuinely earnest and eagerly curious nature, incredibly popular with everyone he interacted with, the heart and soul of social enjoyment, and missed nothing in a vision that was both sharp and kind. Even when he seemed most relaxed, he was never idle in terms of his art, but instead added daily experiences that expanded its scope and allowed his imagination, always actively engaged and impressively tireless, to flourish. He had a true love for nature at all times; and although it may seem odd to link this with the humorous portrayals for which he is most famed, it is indeed the truth that the striking Swiss scenery left a lasting impact on him for many years afterward: a present influence, though it might not always have been directly conscious. When he later remarked that, while writing the book he was currently working on, he had not seen each step of the wooden midshipman's staircase, each pew in the church where Florence was married, or each bed in the dormitory of Doctor Blimber's school less clearly because he was by Lake Geneva at the time, he could just as accurately have said that he saw them even more clearly because of that very situation. He maximized his humor with the freedom and strength of his imagination; while even the smallest or most ordinary objects around him served as inspiration for one, the other would have struggled or failed without additional higher nourishment. Dickens wasn’t fond of Wordsworth, but he embodied the truth the great poet continually emphasized, that [279] nature provides subtle support for all who are allowed to experience her wonders and mysteries.
Another noticeable thing in him is impressed upon these letters, as upon many also heretofore quoted, for indeed all of them are marvellously exact in the reproduction of his nature. He did not think lightly of his work; and the work that occupied him at the time was for the time paramount with him. But the sense he entertained, whether right or wrong, of the importance of what he had to do, of the degree to which it concerned others that the power he held should be exercised successfully, and of the estimate he was justified in forming as the fair measure of its worth or greatness, does not carry with it of necessity presumption or self-conceit. Few men have had less of either. It was part of the intense individuality by which he effected so much, to set the high value which in general he did upon what he was striving to accomplish; he could not otherwise have mastered one half the work he designed; and we are able to form an opinion, more just now for ourselves than it might have seemed to us then from others, of the weight and truth of such self-judgment. The fussy pretension of small men in great places, and the resolute self-assertion of great men in small places, are things essentially different. Respice finem. The exact relative importance of all our pursuits is to be arrived at by nicer adjustments of the Now and the Hereafter than are possible to contemporary judgments; and there have been some indications since his death confirmatory of the belief, that the estimate which he thought himself entitled to form of the labours to which his life was devoted, will be strengthened, not lessened, by time.[280]
Another striking thing about him is evident in these letters, as in many previously quoted, since they all remarkably capture his character. He didn’t take his work lightly; the task he faced at the time was his top priority. However, his sense of the importance of what he needed to do, whether right or wrong, regarding how it impacted others and the significance he believed he was justified in attributing to it, doesn’t necessarily imply arrogance or self-importance. Few people embodied less of either. It was part of his intense individuality that allowed him to achieve so much and to value highly what he was striving to accomplish; otherwise, he wouldn’t have been able to handle even half of the work he envisioned. We can form a more accurate opinion now than we could then, based on others' perspectives, about the weight and truth of such self-assessment. The pretentiousness of small individuals in significant roles and the determined self-assertion of great individuals in lesser positions are fundamentally different things. Respice finem. The true relative importance of all our pursuits can only be understood through more delicate balances of the present and the future than what contemporary judgments can provide; and there have been certain signs since his passing that support the belief that the judgment he felt entitled to make regarding the work to which his life was dedicated will be reinforced, not diminished, over time.[280]
Dickens proposed to himself, it will be remembered, to write at Lausanne not only the first four numbers of his larger book, but the Christmas book suggested to him by his fancy of a battle field; and reserving what is to be said of Dombey to a later chapter, this and its successor will deal only with what he finished as well as began in Switzerland, and will show at what cost even so much was achieved amid his other and larger engagements.
Dickens aimed to write in Lausanne not just the first four parts of his bigger book, but also the Christmas book inspired by his vision of a battlefield. Setting aside the discussion of Dombey for a later chapter, this chapter and the next will focus solely on what he completed along with what he started in Switzerland, illustrating the price he paid to achieve even this much amidst his other significant commitments.
He had restless fancies and misgivings before he settled to his first notion. "I have been thinking this last day or two," he wrote on the 25th of July, "that good Christmas characters might be grown out of the idea of a man imprisoned for ten or fifteen years; his imprisonment being the gap between the people and circumstances of the first part and the altered people and circumstances of the second, and his own changed mind. Though I shall probably proceed with the Battle idea, I should like to know what you think of this one?" It was afterwards used in a modified shape for the Tale of Two Cities. "I shall begin the little story straightway," he wrote a few weeks later; "but I have been dimly conceiving a very ghostly and wild idea, which I suppose I must now reserve for the next Christmas book. Nous verrons. It will mature in the streets of Paris by night, as well as in London." This took ultimately the form of the Haunted Man, which was not written until the winter of 1848. At last I knew that his first slip was done, and that even his eager busy fancy would not turn him back again.
He had restless thoughts and doubts before he settled on his first idea. "I've been thinking these last couple of days," he wrote on July 25th, "that good Christmas characters could emerge from the idea of a man locked up for ten or fifteen years; his imprisonment serving as the gap between the people and circumstances of the first part and the changed people and circumstances of the second, as well as his own changed mindset. Although I will probably go ahead with the Battle idea, I’d like to know what you think of this one?" This idea was later adapted for the Tale of Two Cities. "I’ll start the little story right away," he wrote a few weeks later; "but I’ve been vaguely thinking of a very ghostly and wild idea, which I guess I should save for the next Christmas book. Nous verrons. It will develop in the streets of Paris at night, as well as in London." This eventually became the Haunted Man, which wasn’t written until the winter of 1848. Finally, I realized that his first draft was done, and even his eager, busy mind wouldn’t take him back again.
But other unsatisfied wants and cravings had meanwhile[281] broken out in him, of which I heard near the close of the second number of Dombey. The first he had finished at the end of July; and the second, which he began on the 8th of August, he was still at work upon in the first week of September, when this remarkable announcement came to me. It was his first detailed confession of what he felt so continuously, and if that were possible even more strongly, as the years went on, that there is no single passage in any of his letters which throws such a flood of illuminative light into the portions of his life which always awaken the greatest interest. Very much that is to follow must be read by it. "You can hardly imagine," he wrote on the 30th of August, "what infinite pains I take, or what extraordinary difficulty I find in getting on fast. Invention, thank God, seems the easiest thing in the world; and I seem to have such a preposterous sense of the ridiculous, after this long rest" (it was now over two years since the close of Chuzzlewit), "as to be constantly requiring to restrain myself from launching into extravagances in the height of my enjoyment. But the difficulty of going at what I call a rapid pace, is prodigious; it is almost an impossibility. I suppose this is partly the effect of two years' ease, and partly of the absence of streets and numbers of figures. I can't express how much I want these. It seems as if they supplied something to my brain, which it cannot bear, when busy, to lose. For a week or a fortnight I can write prodigiously in a retired place (as at Broadstairs), and a day in London sets me up again and starts me. But the toil and labour of writing, day after day, without that magic lantern, is immense!! I don't say this[282] at all in low spirits, for we are perfectly comfortable here, and I like the place very much indeed, and the people are even more friendly and fond of me than they were in Genoa. I only mention it as a curious fact, which I have never had an opportunity of finding out before. My figures seem disposed to stagnate without crowds about them. I wrote very little in Genoa (only the Chimes), and fancied myself conscious of some such influence there—but Lord! I had two miles of streets at least, lighted at night, to walk about in; and a great theatre to repair to, every night." At the close of the letter he told me that he had pretty well matured the general idea of the Christmas book, and was burning to get to work on it. He thought it would be all the better, for a change, to have no fairies or spirits in it, but to make it a simple domestic tale.[127]
But other unfulfilled desires and cravings had meanwhile[281] emerged in him, which I found out near the end of the second installment of Dombey. He had completed the first part at the end of July; and on August 8th, he started the second part, which he was still working on during the first week of September when this significant revelation reached me. It was his first detailed admission of what he felt so consistently, and if possible even more intensely, as the years passed, that there is no single section in any of his letters that sheds such illuminating light on those parts of his life that always spark the greatest interest. Much of what follows needs to be understood through it. "You can hardly imagine," he wrote on August 30th, "the immense effort I put in, or the extraordinary difficulty I face in moving quick. Creating, thank God, feels like the easiest thing in the world, and I have such an absurd sense of the ridiculous, after this long break" (it had been over two years since the end of Chuzzlewit), "that I often have to hold myself back from diving into excesses in the midst of my enjoyment. But the challenge of maintaining what I call a quick pace is enormous; it feels almost impossible. I guess this is partly due to two years of ease, and partly because of the absence of streets and numbers. I can’t express how much I need these. It feels like they provide something to my mind that it just can't cope without while it's busy. For a week or two, I can write a lot in a quiet place (like at Broadstairs), and just a day in London revitalizes me and gets me going again. But the struggle and hard work of writing day after day, without that magic lantern, is huge!! I'm not saying this at all in a sad way, because we are perfectly comfortable here, and I really like the place, and the people are even more friendly and affectionate towards me than they were in Genoa. I just mention it as an interesting fact that I've never had a chance to discover before. My characters seem to stall without a crowd around them. I wrote very little in Genoa (only the Chimes), and I thought I noticed some kind of influence there—but goodness! I had at least two miles of streets, lit at night, to walk around in; and a big theater to go to every night." At the end of the letter, he told me that he had pretty much finalized the general idea for the Christmas book and was eager to start working on it. He thought it would be even better, for a change, to have no fairies or spirits in it, but to make it a straightforward domestic story.[127]
In less than a week from this date his second number was finished, his first slip of the little book done, and his confidence greater. They had had wonderful weather,[128] so clear that he could see from the Neuchâtel[283] road the whole of Mont Blanc, six miles distant, as plainly as if he were standing close under it in the courtyard of the little inn at Chamounix; and, though again it was raining when he wrote, his "nailed shoes" were by him and his "great waterproof cloak" in preparation for a "fourteen-mile walk" before dinner. Then, after three days more, came something of a sequel to the confession before made, which will be read with equal interest. "The absence of any accessible streets continues to worry me, now that I have so much to do, in a most singular manner. It is quite a little mental phenomenon. I should not walk in them in the day time, if they were here, I dare say: but at night I want them beyond description. I don't seem able to get rid of my spectres unless I can lose them in crowds. However, as you say, there are streets in Paris, and good suggestive streets too: and trips to London will be nothing then. When I have finished the Christmas book, I shall fly to Geneva for a day or two, before taking up with Dombey again. I like this place better and better; and never saw, I think, more agreeable people than our little circle is made up of. It is so little, that one is not 'bothered' in the least; and their interest in the inimitable seems to strengthen daily. I read them the first number last night 'was a' week, with unrelateable success; and old Mrs. Marcet,[284] who is devilish 'cute, guessed directly (but I didn't tell her she was right) that little Paul would die. They were all so apprehensive that it was a great pleasure to read it; and I shall leave here, if all goes well, in a brilliant shower of sparks struck out of them by the promised reading of the Christmas book." Little did either of us then imagine to what these readings were to lead, but even thus early they were taking in his mind the shape of a sort of jest that the smallest opportunity of favour might have turned into earnest. In his very next letter he wrote to me: "I was thinking the other day that in these days of lecturings and readings, a great deal of money might possibly be made (if it were not infra dig) by one's having Readings of one's own books. It would be an odd thing. I think it would take immensely. What do you say? Will you step to Dean-street, and see how Miss Kelly's engagement-book (it must be an immense volume!) stands? Or shall I take the St. James's?" My answer is to be inferred from his rejoinder: but even at this time, while heightening and carrying forward his jest, I suspected him of graver desires than he cared to avow; and the time was to come, after a dozen years, when with earnestness equal to his own I continued to oppose, for reasons to be stated in their place, that which he had set his heart upon too strongly to abandon, and which I still can only wish he had preferred to surrender with all that seemed to be its enormous gains! "I don't think you have exercised your usual judgment in taking Covent-garden for me. I doubt it is too large for my purpose. However, I shall stand by whatever you propose to the proprietors."
In less than a week from now, he had finished his second issue, completed the first draft of the little book, and felt more confident. They had great weather, so clear that he could see all of Mont Blanc, six miles away, as clearly as if he were standing right under it in the courtyard of the little inn in Chamounix. Although it was raining again while he wrote, his "nailed shoes" were nearby and his "great waterproof cloak" was ready for a "fourteen-mile walk" before dinner. Then, after three more days, there was a follow-up to his earlier confession, which will be just as interesting to read. "The lack of any accessible streets continues to trouble me in a really strange way now that I have so much to do. It's a bit of a mental phenomenon. I probably wouldn’t walk in them during the day if they were here, but at night I want them desperately. I can't seem to shake off my ghosts unless I can lose them in a crowd. However, as you mentioned, there are streets in Paris, and good ones at that: trips to London won’t be any trouble then. When I finish the Christmas book, I plan to dash off to Geneva for a day or two before diving back into Dombey. I'm really enjoying this place more and more; I think I've never met more pleasant people than in our little group. It's so small that it’s not overwhelming at all, and their interest in the unique seems to grow daily. I read them the first issue last night with incredible success, and old Mrs. Marcet, who is quite sharp, guessed right away (though I didn’t tell her she was right) that little Paul would die. They were all so anxious that it was a delight to read it, and if all goes well, I’ll leave here with a brilliant spark of excitement from them because of the upcoming reading of the Christmas book." Neither of us imagined where these readings would lead, but even at this early stage, they were subtly shaping in his mind a kind of joke that could easily turn serious with the right opportunity. In his very next letter, he wrote to me: "The other day, I was thinking that nowadays, with all this lecturing and reading, a lot of money could potentially be made (if it weren’t beneath one’s dignity) by doing readings of one’s own books. It would be a strange thing. I think it would catch on immensely. What do you think? Will you go to Dean Street and check how Miss Kelly's booking calendar (it must be a huge volume!) looks? Or should I go to St. James’s?" My response can be inferred from his reply: but even at this moment, while building on his joke, I suspected he had deeper aspirations than he was willing to admit; and years later, I would find myself opposing, with a determination equal to his own, what he had become so set on that he couldn’t let go, and which I still wish he had chosen to abandon, despite its seeming massive rewards! "I don't think you used your usual judgment in picking Covent Garden for me. I doubt it's too big for my needs. However, I’ll support whatever you suggest to the owners."
Soon came the changes of trouble and vexation I had too surely seen. "You remember," he wrote, "your objection about the two stories. I made over light of it. I ought to have considered that I have never before really tried the opening of two together—having always had one pretty far ahead when I have been driving a pair of them. I know it all now. The apparent impossibility of getting each into its place, coupled with that craving for streets, so thoroughly put me off the track, that, up to Wednesday or Thursday last, I really contemplated, at times, the total abandonment of the Christmas book this year, and the limitation of my labours to Dombey and Son! I cancelled the beginning of a first scene—which I have never done before—and, with a notion in my head, ran wildly about and about it, and could not get the idea into any natural socket. At length, thank Heaven, I nailed it all at once; and after going on comfortably up to yesterday, and working yesterday from half-past nine to six, I was last night in such a state of enthusiasm about it that I think I was an inch or two taller. I am a little cooler to-day, with a headache to boot; but I really begin to hope you will think it a pretty story, with some delicate notions in it agreeably presented, and with a good human Christmas groundwork. I fancy I see a great domestic effect in the last part."
Soon came the changes of trouble and frustration I had definitely anticipated. "You remember," he wrote, "your concern about the two storylines. I dismissed it too lightly. I should have realized that I've never really tried to open two at once—I've always had one pretty far along while I was working on both. I understand it all now. The apparent difficulty of fitting each into its place, combined with that longing for streets, threw me off track so much that, up until Wednesday or Thursday of last week, I seriously considered abandoning the Christmas book this year and just focusing on Dombey and Son! I scrapped the start of a first scene—which I've never done before—and, with an idea in mind, ran around trying to figure it out, unable to get the concept into any natural groove. Finally, thank goodness, I nailed it all at once; and after working comfortably up to yesterday and putting in hours yesterday from half-past nine to six, I felt such enthusiasm about it last night that I think I stood an inch or two taller. I’m a bit cooler today, though I have a headache; but I really starting to hope you’ll find it a lovely story, with some nicely presented delicate ideas, and a solid, relatable Christmas foundation. I can almost see a great domestic impact in the last part."
That was written on the 20th of September; but six days later changed the picture and surprised me not a little. I might grudge the space thus given to one of the least important of his books but that the illustration goes farther than the little tale it refers to,[286] and is a picture of him in his moods of writing, with their weakness as well as strength upon him, of a perfect truth and applicability to every period of his life. Movement and change while he was working were not mere restlessness, as we have seen; it was no impatience of labour, or desire of pleasure, that led at such times to his eager craving for the fresh crowds and faces in which he might lose or find the creatures of his fancy; and recollecting this, much hereafter will be understood that might else be very far from clear, in regard to the sensitive conditions under which otherwise he carried on these exertions of his brain. "I am going to write you" (26th of September) "a most startling piece of intelligence. I fear there may be no Christmas Book! I would give the world to be on the spot to tell you this. Indeed I once thought of starting for London to-night. I have written nearly a third of it. It promises to be pretty; quite a new idea in the story, I hope; but to manage it without the supernatural agency now impossible of introduction, and yet to move it naturally within the required space, or with any shorter limit than a Vicar of Wakefield, I find to be a difficulty so perplexing—the past Dombey work taken into account—that I am fearful of wearing myself out if I go on, and not being able to come back to the greater undertaking with the necessary freshness and spirit. If I had nothing but the Christmas book to do, I would do it; but I get horrified and distressed beyond conception at the prospect of being jaded when I come back to the other, and making it a mere race against time. I have written the first part; I know the end and upshot of the[287] second; and the whole of the third (there are only three in all). I know the purport of each character, and the plain idea that each is to work out; and I have the principal effects sketched on paper. It cannot end quite happily, but will end cheerfully and pleasantly. But my soul sinks before the commencement of the second part—the longest—and the introduction of the under-idea. (The main one already developed, with interest.) I don't know how it is. I suppose it is the having been almost constantly at work in this quiet place; and the dread for the Dombey; and the not being able to get rid of it, in noise and bustle. The beginning two books together is also, no doubt, a fruitful source of the difficulty; for I am now sure I could not have invented the Carol at the commencement of the Chuzzlewit, or gone to a new book from the Chimes. But this is certain. I am sick, giddy, and capriciously despondent. I have bad nights; am full of disquietude and anxiety; and am constantly haunted by the idea that I am wasting the marrow of the larger book, and ought to be at rest. One letter that I wrote you before this, I have torn up. In that the Christmas book was wholly given up for this year: but I now resolve to make one effort more. I will go to Geneva to-morrow, and try on Monday and Tuesday whether I can get on at all bravely, in the changed scene. If I cannot, I am convinced that I had best hold my hand at once; and not fritter my spirits and hope away, with that long book before me. You may suppose that the matter is very grave when I can so nearly abandon anything in which I am deeply interested, and fourteen or fifteen close MS. pages of which, that have made me laugh and[288] cry, are lying in my desk. Writing this letter at all, I have a great misgiving that the letter I shall write you on Tuesday night will not make it better. Take it, for Heaven's sake, as an extremely serious thing, and not a fancy of the moment. Last Saturday after a very long day's work, and last Wednesday after finishing the first part, I was full of eagerness and pleasure. At all other times since I began, I have been brooding and brooding over the idea that it was a wild thing to dream of, ever: and that I ought to be at rest for the Dombey."
That was written on September 20th; but six days later, everything changed, and I was quite surprised. I might hesitate to devote this much space to one of his less significant books, but the illustration conveys more than just the little story it refers to,[286] and depicts him in his writing moods, showing both his weaknesses and strengths in a way that perfectly captures the truth and relevance to every stage of his life. The movement and change while he was working weren't just restlessness, as we've seen; it wasn’t impatience with his work or a desire for pleasure that drove him to seek out fresh crowds and faces to lose or find the characters of his imagination. Remembering this makes much of what follows clearer, particularly about the sensitive conditions under which he engaged in these mental efforts. "I am going to write you" (September 26th) "a most startling piece of news. I’m afraid there may be no Christmas book! I would give anything to be there to tell you this. I even thought about heading to London tonight. I have almost a third of it written. It seems promising; I hope it brings a fresh idea to the story. However, figuring out how to do it without the supernatural element is now impossible to introduce, and yet to make it flow naturally within the limited space, or shorter than a Vicar of Wakefield, is such a confusing challenge—considering the previous Dombey work—that I’m worried about exhausting myself if I keep going, and not being able to return to the bigger project with the required energy and inspiration. If I only had the Christmas book to focus on, I would finish it; but I feel horrified and deeply stressed at the thought of being worn out when I return to the other and turning it into a mere race against time. I’ve written the first part; I know the conclusion and outcome of the[287] second part; and the entirety of the third (there are only three in total). I understand the purpose of each character, and what each is supposed to accomplish; and I have the main effects outlined. It can’t end completely happily, but it will wrap up cheerfully and pleasantly. Yet my heart sinks at the thought of starting the second part—the longest—and introducing the underlying idea. (The main one has already been developed with interest.) I don’t really know why. I guess it’s because I’ve been almost constantly working in this quiet place; and the anxiety over Dombey; and the inability to shake it off amidst noise and chaos. Starting two books simultaneously is certainly a major source of the challenge; because I’m now certain I wouldn’t have been able to create the Carol at the start of Chuzzlewit, or move to a new book from The Chimes. But this is clear. I am feeling sick, dizzy, and unpredictably despondent. I have had rough nights; I’m filled with unrest and worry; and I’m constantly plagued by the thought that I am squandering the essence of the larger book, and I ought to take a break. I tore up one letter I wrote you before this, which stated that the Christmas book was entirely canceled for this year; but I now decide to make one more attempt. I will go to Geneva tomorrow, and see on Monday and Tuesday if I can make any progress in this new environment. If I can’t, I’m convinced I should stop right away and not deplete my energy and hope while that big book looms ahead. You can guess it’s serious when I can almost give up on something I care so deeply about, and fourteen or fifteen close manuscript pages, which have made me both laugh and[288] cry, are sitting in my desk. I have a strong feeling that the letter I write you on Tuesday night won’t improve things. Please take this, for Heaven's sake, as an extremely serious matter, not just a fleeting thought. Last Saturday, after a very long day’s work, and last Wednesday after finishing the first part, I was filled with eagerness and joy. At all other times since I started, I’ve been mulling over the idea that it was a wild thing to dream of, ever: and that I ought to take a break for the Dombey."
The letter came, written on Wednesday not Tuesday night, and it left the question still unsettled. "When I came here" (Geneva, 30th of September) "I had a bloodshot eye; and my head was so bad, with a pain across the brow, that I thought I must have got cupped. I have become a great deal better, however, and feel quite myself again to-day. . . . I still have not made up my mind as to what I can do with the Christmas book. I would give any money that it were possible to consult with you. I have begun the second part this morning, and have done a very fair morning's work at it, but I do not feel it in hand within the necessary space and divisions: and I have a great uneasiness in the prospect of falling behind hand with the other labour, which is so transcendantly important. I feel quite sure that unless I (being in reasonably good state and spirits) like the Christmas book myself, I had better not go on with it; but had best keep my strength for Dombey, and keep my number in advance. On the other hand I am dreadfully averse to abandoning it, and am so torn between the two things that I know not what to do. It[289] is impossible to express the wish I have that I could take counsel with you. Having begun the second part I will go on here, to-morrow and Friday (Saturday, the Talfourds come to us at Lausanne, leaving on Monday morning), unless I see new reason to give it up in the meanwhile. Let it stand thus—that my next Monday's letter shall finally decide the question. But if you have not already told Bradbury and Evans of my last letter I think it will now be best to do so. . . . This non-publication of a Christmas book, if it must be, I try to think light of with the greater story just begun, and with this Battle of Life story (of which I really think the leading idea is very pretty) lying by me, for future use. But I would like you to consider, in the event of my not going on, how best, by timely announcement, in November's or December's Dombey, I may seem to hold the ground prospectively. . . . Heaven send me a good deliverance! If I don't do it, it will be the first time I ever abandoned anything I had once taken in hand; and I shall not have abandoned it until after a most desperate fight. I could do it, but for the Dombey, as easily as I did last year or the year before. But I cannot help falling back on that continually: and this, combined with the peculiar difficulties of the story for a Christmas book, and my being out of sorts, discourages me sadly. . . . Kate is here, and sends her love." . . . A postscript was added on the following day. "Georgy has come over from Lausanne, and joins with Kate, &c. &c. My head remains greatly better. My eye is recovering its old hue of beautiful white, tinged with celestial blue. If I hadn't come here, I think I should have had some bad low fever.[290] The sight of the rushing Rhone seemed to stir my blood again. I don't think I shall want to be cupped, this bout; but it looked, at one time, worse than I have confessed to you. If I have any return, I will have it done immediately."
The letter arrived, written on Wednesday instead of Tuesday night, leaving the question still open. "When I got here" (Geneva, September 30) "I had a bloodshot eye and a terrible headache, with pain across my brow, making me think I might need to get cupped. I’ve gotten a lot better, though, and I feel like myself again today. . . . I still haven’t figured out what I can do with the Christmas book. I would pay anything to consult with you. I started the second part this morning and made good progress, but I still don’t feel like I have it under control within the necessary sections and divisions. I’m quite anxious about the prospect of falling behind with the other work, which is incredibly important. I’m sure that unless I (being in reasonably good shape and mood) genuinely like the Christmas book myself, I’d better not continue with it; instead, I should conserve my strength for Dombey and keep my progress up. On the other hand, I really don’t want to give it up, and I’m so torn between the two that I don’t know what to do. It[289] is impossible to express how much I wish I could consult with you. Having started the second part, I’ll keep working on it here tomorrow and Friday (the Talfourds are coming to see us in Lausanne on Saturday, leaving Monday morning), unless I find a new reason to abandon it in the meantime. Let it stand that my next letter on Monday will finally decide this question. But if you haven’t let Bradbury and Evans know about my last letter, I think you should do that now. . . . I try to think lightly about not publishing a Christmas book, especially with the bigger story just started, and with this Battle of Life story (which I genuinely think has a lovely main idea) waiting for future use. But I would like you to think about how best, with a timely announcement in November's or December's Dombey, I can seem to hold the ground for the future in case I don’t go on. . . . Heaven help me find a good solution! If I don’t pursue it, it will be the first time I’ve ever given up on something I started; and I won’t have abandoned it without a fierce struggle. I could continue it, just like I did last year or the year before, if it weren’t for Dombey. But I can’t stop thinking about that, and combined with the specific challenges of the story for a Christmas book, and me being out of sorts, it’s really discouraging. . . . Kate is here and sends her love." . . . A postscript was added the next day: "Georgy has come over from Lausanne and joins Kate, etc., etc. My head is much better. My eye is regaining its old beautiful white hue, with a hint of celestial blue. If I hadn’t come here, I think I would have caught some nasty low fever.[290] The sight of the rushing Rhone seems to have rejuvenated me. I don’t think I’ll need to get cupped this time; it looked worse at one point than I’ve admitted to you. If I do have a recurrence, I’ll get it done right away."
He stayed two days longer at Geneva, which he found to be a very good place; pleasantly reporting himself as quite dismayed at first by the sight of gas in it, and as trembling at the noise in its streets, which he pronounced to be fully equal to the uproar of Richmond in Surrey; but deriving from it some sort of benefit both in health and in writing. So far his trip had been successful, though he had to leave the place hurriedly to welcome his English visitors to Rosemont.
He stayed two days longer in Geneva, which he found to be a really nice place. He humorously mentioned being a bit shocked at first by the sight of gas there and feeling nervous about the noise in the streets, which he said was just as loud as the chaos in Richmond in Surrey. However, he gained some benefits from it, both in terms of his health and his writing. Up to this point, his trip had been successful, although he had to leave the city quickly to welcome his English guests to Rosemont.
One social and very novel experience he had in his hotel, however, the night before he left, which may be told before he hastens back to Lausanne; for it could hardly now offend any one even if the names were given. "And now sir I will describe, modestly, tamely, literally, the visit to the small select circle which I promised should make your hair stand on end. In our hotel were Lady A, and Lady B, mother and daughter, who came to the Peschiere shortly before we left it, and who have a deep admiration for your humble servant the inimitable B. They are both very clever. Lady B, extremely well-informed in languages, living and dead; books, and gossip; very pretty; with two little children, and not yet five and twenty. Lady A, plump, fresh, and rosy; matronly, but full of spirits and good looks. Nothing would serve them but we must dine with them; and accordingly, on Friday at six, we went down to their room. I knew them to be[291] rather odd. For instance, I have known Lady A, full dressed, walk alone through the streets of Genoa, the squalid Italian bye streets, to the Governor's soirée; and announce herself at the palace of state, by knocking at the door. I have also met Lady B, full dressed, without any cap or bonnet, walking a mile to the opera, with all sorts of jingling jewels about her, beside a sedan chair in which sat enthroned her mama. Consequently, I was not surprised at such little sparkles in the conversation (from the young lady) as 'Oh God what a sermon we had here, last Sunday!' 'And did you ever read such infernal trash as Mrs. Gore's?'—and the like. Still, but for Kate and Georgy (who were decidedly in the way, as we agreed afterwards), I should have thought it all very funny; and, as it was, I threw the ball back again, was mighty free and easy, made some rather broad jokes, and was highly applauded. 'You smoke, don't you?' said the young lady, in a pause of this kind of conversation. 'Yes,' I said, 'I generally take a cigar after dinner when I am alone.' 'I'll give you a good 'un,' said she, 'when we go up-stairs.' Well sir, in due course we went up stairs, and there we were joined by an American lady residing in the same hotel, who looked like what we call in old England 'a reg'lar Bunter'—fluffy face (rouged); considerable development of figure; one groggy eye; blue satin dress made low with short sleeves, and shoes of the same. Also a daughter; face likewise fluffy; figure likewise developed; dress likewise low, with short sleeves, and shoes of the same; and one eye not yet actually groggy, but going to be. American lady married at sixteen; daughter sixteen[292] now, often mistaken for sisters, &c. &c. &c. When that was over, Lady B brought out a cigar box, and gave me a cigar, made of negrohead she said, which would quell an elephant in six whiffs. The box was full of cigarettes—good large ones, made of pretty strong tobacco; I always smoke them here, and used to smoke them at Genoa, and I knew them well. When I lighted my cigar, Lady B lighted hers, at mine; leaned against the mantelpiece, in conversation with me; put out her stomach, folded her arms, and with her pretty face cocked up sideways and her cigarette smoking away like a Manchester cotton mill, laughed, and talked, and smoked, in the most gentlemanly manner I ever beheld. Lady A immediately lighted her cigar; American lady immediately lighted hers; and in five minutes the room was a cloud of smoke, with us four in the centre pulling away bravely, while American lady related stories of her 'Hookah' up stairs, and described different kinds of pipes. But even this was not all. For presently two Frenchmen came in, with whom, and the American lady, Lady B sat down to whist. The Frenchmen smoked of course (they were really modest gentlemen, and seemed dismayed), and Lady B played for the next hour or two with a cigar continually in her mouth—never out of it. She certainly smoked six or eight. Lady A gave in soon—I think she only did it out of vanity. American lady had been smoking all the morning. I took no more; and Lady B and the Frenchmen had it all to themselves.
One social and quite novel experience I had at the hotel the night before I left, which I'll share before I rush back to Lausanne, probably won't offend anyone even if names are mentioned. "Now, I'll describe, in a humble and straightforward way, the visit to the small, exclusive circle I mentioned that would leave you shocked. At our hotel were Lady A and Lady B, a mother and daughter who arrived at the Peschiere shortly before we left and have a deep admiration for your truly unique friend, B. They are both very intelligent. Lady B is extremely knowledgeable about languages, both living and dead; literature, and the latest gossip; she's very pretty with two little kids and isn't even twenty-five yet. Lady A is plump, fresh, and rosy; matronly but full of energy and charm. They were insistent that we *must* have dinner with them, so on Friday at six, we headed down to their room. I knew they could be a bit eccentric. For example, Lady A, *fully dressed*, once walked alone through the rough streets of Genoa to get to the Governor's soirée and announced her arrival at the palace by knocking on the door. I also saw Lady B, fully dressed, without a cap or bonnet, walking a mile to the opera, wearing all sorts of jangly jewelry, next to her mother who was in a sedan chair. So, I wasn’t surprised by the little sparks in the conversation (from the young lady) like 'Oh God, what a sermon we had here last Sunday!' and 'Have you ever read such awful drivel as Mrs. Gore's?' and similar. Still, except for Kate and Georgy (who were definitely a distraction, as we agreed later), I would have found it all very amusing; and as it was, I responded playfully, joked a bit, and was met with great approval. 'You smoke, right?' the young lady asked during a pause in the chat. 'Yes,' I replied, 'I usually have a cigar after dinner when I'm alone.' 'I'll give you a good one,' she said, 'when we go upstairs.' So, eventually, we did head upstairs, where we were joined by an American lady staying at the same hotel, who looked like what we used to call in old England 'a real Bunter'—fluffy face (rouged); quite a curvy figure; one droopy eye; dressed in a blue satin gown with short sleeves, and matching shoes. She also had a daughter who had a similarly fluffy face; a developed figure; a similarly low dress with short sleeves, and matching shoes; and one eye that wasn’t completely droopy yet but was on its way. The American lady got married at sixteen; her daughter is now sixteen, and they are often mistaken for sisters, etc. etc. After that, Lady B pulled out a cigar box and gave me a cigar, which she said was made of blackhead and could knock out an elephant in just six puffs. The box was filled with big cigarettes made from pretty strong tobacco; I always smoke them here and used to smoke them in Genoa, so I knew them well. As I lit my cigar, Lady B lit hers from mine, leaned against the mantelpiece, engaged in conversation with me, puffed her stomach out, crossed her arms, and with her lovely face tilted sideways and her cigarette smoking away like a cotton mill, laughed, chatted, and smoked in the most gentlemanly way I’ve ever seen. Lady A quickly lit her cigar; the American lady did the same; and within five minutes, the room was filled with smoke, with the four of us at the center toking away while the American lady shared stories about her 'Hookah' upstairs and described different kinds of pipes. But that wasn’t all. Shortly after, two Frenchmen walked in, with whom, and the American lady, Lady B sat down to play whist. The Frenchmen smoked, of course (they were quite modest guys and seemed shocked), and Lady B played for the next hour or two with a cigar constantly in her mouth—never taking it out. She definitely smoked six or eight cigars. Lady A gave up quickly—I think she only did it out of vanity. The American lady had been smoking all morning. I stopped after that; and Lady B and the Frenchmen smoked away without me.
"Conceive this in a great hotel, with not only their own servants, but half a dozen waiters coming constantly[293] in and out! I showed no atom of surprise; but I never was so surprised, so ridiculously taken aback, in my life; for in all my experience of 'ladies' of one kind and another, I never saw a woman—not a basket woman or a gypsy—smoke, before!" He lived to have larger and wider experience, but there was enough to startle as well as amuse him in the scene described.
"Imagine this in a fancy hotel, with not just their own staff, but half a dozen waiters constantly coming in and out! I showed no hint of surprise; but I had never been so shocked, so completely taken aback, in my life; because in all my encounters with 'ladies' of various sorts, I had never seen a woman—not a market seller or a gypsy—smoke before!" He went on to have bigger and broader experiences, but there was enough to both surprise and entertain him in the scene described.
But now Saturday is come; he has hurried back for the friends who are on their way to his cottage; and on his arrival, even before they have appeared, he writes to tell me his better news of himself and his work.
But now Saturday has arrived; he's rushed back for the friends who are on their way to his cottage; and upon his arrival, even before they show up, he writes to share his good news about himself and his work.
"In the breathless interval" (Rosemont: 3rd of October) "between our return from Geneva and the arrival of the Talfourds (expected in an hour or two), I cannot do better than write to you. For I think you will be well pleased if I anticipate my promise, and Monday, at the same time. I have been greatly better at Geneva, though I still am made uneasy by occasional giddiness and headache: attributable, I have not the least doubt, to the absence of streets. There is an idea here, too, that people are occasionally made despondent and sluggish in their spirits by this great mass of still water, lake Leman. At any rate I have been very uncomfortable: at any rate I am, I hope, greatly better: and (lastly) at any rate I hope and trust, now, the Christmas book will come in due course!! I have had three very good days' work at Geneva, and trust I may finish the second part (the third is the shortest) by this day week. Whenever I finish it, I will send you the first two together. I do not think they can begin to illustrate it, until the third arrives; for it is a [294]single minded story, as it were, and an artist should know the end: which I don't think very likely, unless he reads it." Then, after relating a superhuman effort he was making to lodge his visitors in his doll's house ("I didn't like the idea of turning them out at night. It is so dark in these lanes, and groves, when the moon's not bright"), he sketched for me what he possibly might, and really did, accomplish. He would by great effort finish the small book on the 20th; would fly to Geneva for a week to work a little at Dombey, if he felt "pretty sound;" in any case would finish his number three by the 10th of November; and on that day would start for Paris: "so that, instead of resting unprofitably here, I shall be using my interval of idleness to make the journey and get into a new house, and shall hope so to put a pinch of salt on the tail of the sliding number in advance. . . . I am horrified at the idea of getting the blues (and bloodshots) again." Though I did not then know how gravely ill he had been, I was fain to remind him that it was bad economy to make business out of rest itself; but I received prompt confirmation that all was falling out as he wished. The Talfourds stayed two days: "and I think they were very happy. He was in his best aspect; the manner so well known to us, not the less loveable for being laughable; and if you could have seen him going round and round the coach that brought them, as a preliminary to paying the voiturier to whom he couldn't speak, in a currency he didn't understand, you never would have forgotten it." His friends left Lausanne on the 5th; and five days later he sent me two-thirds of the manuscript of his Christmas book.
"In the brief moment" (Rosemont: October 3rd) "between our return from Geneva and the arrival of the Talfourds (expected in an hour or two), I couldn't do better than write to you. I think you'll appreciate it if I share this ahead of schedule, and on Monday as well. I've been feeling much better in Geneva, although I still get occasional dizziness and headaches, which I’m sure are due to the lack of streets. There's also a belief here that the vast body of still water, Lake Leman, can sometimes make people feel down and sluggish. Still, I've been quite uncomfortable: but I'm, I hope, feeling considerably better: and (finally) I trust that the Christmas book will arrive on time!! I had a productive three days in Geneva, and I hope to finish the second part (the third is the shortest) by this time next week. Whenever I finish it, I'll send you the first two together. I don't think they can start illustrating it until the third part arrives; it's a [294]single-minded story, and an artist should know the ending, which I doubt is likely unless they read it." Then, after describing an extraordinary effort he was making to accommodate his visitors in his dollhouse ("I didn’t like the idea of sending them out at night. It gets so dark in these lanes and groves when the moon isn’t bright"), he outlined what he could possibly achieve. He would manage to finish the small book by the 20th; would rush to Geneva for a week to work a bit on Dombey, if he felt "pretty well;" in any case, he would complete number three by November 10th; and on that day he would leave for Paris: "so instead of wasting time here, I shall use my idle time to travel and settle into a new house, hoping to get a head start on the upcoming number. . . . I’m terrified at the thought of feeling blue (and having bloodshot eyes) again." Although I didn’t realize how seriously ill he had been at that time, I felt it was a bad idea to turn rest itself into a job; but I got a quick reassurance that everything was going according to his plans. The Talfourds stayed for two days: "and I think they were very happy. He was at his best; his familiar manner, even more lovable for being amusing; and if you could have seen him going around the coach that brought them, as a way to pay the driver he couldn't communicate with, using currency he didn’t understand, you would never forget it." His friends left Lausanne on the 5th; and five days later he sent me two-thirds of the manuscript of his Christmas book.
CHAPTER XIV.
REVOLUTION AT GENEVA, CHRISTMAS BOOK, AND LAST DAYS IN SWITZERLAND.
1846.
"I send you in twelve letters, counting this as one, the first two parts (thirty-five slips) of the Christmas book. I have two present anxieties respecting it. One to know that you have received it safely; and the second to know how it strikes you. Be sure you read the first and second parts together. . . . There seems to me to be interest in it, and a pretty idea; and it is unlike the others. . . . There will be some minor points for consideration: as, the necessity for some slight alterations in one or two of the Doctor's speeches in the first part; and whether it should be called 'The Battle of Life. A Love Story'—to express both a love[296] story in the common acceptation of the phrase, and also a story of love; with one or two other things of that sort. We can moot these by and by. I made a tremendous day's work of it yesterday and was horribly excited—so I am going to rush out, as fast as I can: being a little used up, and sick. . . . But never say die! I have been to the glass to look at my eye. Pretty bright!"
"I'm sending" you twelve letters, including this one, the first two parts (thirty-five slips) of the Christmas book. I have two concerns about it. One is to know that you received it safely; the other is to hear your thoughts on it. Make sure you read the first and second parts together. . . . I think there’s something interesting about it and a nice concept, and it's different from the others. . . . There are a few minor points to think about, like the need for some slight changes in one or two of the Doctor's speeches in the first part, and whether it should be called 'The Battle of Life. A Love Story'—to capture both a love story in the usual sense and also a story about love; plus a couple of other things like that. We can discuss these later. I put in a huge amount of work yesterday and got really excited—so I'm going to hurry out as fast as I can: feeling a bit drained and unwell. . . . But never give up! I looked in the mirror to check my eye. Pretty bright!"
I made it brighter next day by telling him that the first number of Dombey had outstripped in sale the first of Chuzzlewit by more than twelve thousand copies; and his next letter, sending the close of his little tale, showed his need of the comfort my pleasant news had given him. "I really do not know what this story is worth. I am so floored: wanting sleep, and never having had my head free from it for this month past. I think there are some places in this last part which I may bring better together in the proof, and where a touch or two may be of service; particularly in the scene between Craggs and Michael Warden, where, as it stands, the interest seems anticipated. But I shall have the benefit of your suggestions, and my own then cooler head, I hope; and I will be very careful with the proofs, and keep them by me as long as I can. . . . Mr. Britain must have another Christian name, then? 'Aunt Martha' is the Sally of whom the Doctor speaks in the first part. Martha is a better name. What do you think of the concluding paragraph? Would you leave it for happiness' sake? It is merely experimental. . . . I am flying to Geneva to-morrow morning." (That was on the 18th of October; and on the 20th he wrote from Geneva.) "We came here[297] yesterday, and we shall probably remain until Katey's birthday, which is next Thursday week. I shall fall to work on number three of Dombey as soon as I can. At present I am the worse for wear, but nothing like as much so as I expected to be on Sunday last. I had not been able to sleep for some time, and had been hammering away, morning, noon, and night. A bottle of hock on Monday, when Elliotson dined with us (he went away homeward yesterday morning), did me a world of good; the change comes in the very nick of time; and I feel in Dombeian spirits already. . . . But I have still rather a damaged head, aching a good deal occasionally, as it is doing now, though I have not been cupped—yet. . . . I dreamed all last week that the Battle of Life was a series of chambers impossible to be got to rights or got out of, through which I wandered drearily all night. On Saturday night I don't think I slept an hour. I was perpetually roaming through the story, and endeavouring to dove-tail the revolution here into the plot. The mental distress, quite horrible."
I brightened things up the next day by telling him that the first issue of Dombey sold over twelve thousand more copies than the first of Chuzzlewit; and in his next letter, which included the ending of his little story, it was clear how much comfort my good news provided him. "I honestly don't know what this story is worth. I'm so exhausted: I haven't slept and my mind hasn't been clear for the past month. I think there are some parts in this last section that I can connect better in the proof, and a few tweaks might help; particularly in the scene between Craggs and Michael Warden, where, as it stands, the tension seems a bit predictable. But I'll get your feedback, and I hope my mind will be clearer by then; I'll be very careful with the proofs and hold onto them as long as I can. . . . Mr. Britain needs another Christian name, right? 'Aunt Martha' is the Sally that the Doctor mentions in the first section. Martha's a better name. What do you think of the ending paragraph? Would you keep it for the sake of happiness? It’s just experimental. . . . I'm heading to Geneva tomorrow morning." (That was on October 18th; and on the 20th he wrote from Geneva.) "We arrived here[297] yesterday, and we’ll probably stay until Katey's birthday, which is next Thursday week. I'll get to work on number three of Dombey as soon as I can. Right now, I’m feeling pretty worn out, but not nearly as bad as I expected to be last Sunday. I hadn't been able to sleep for a while and had been working non-stop. A bottle of hock on Monday, when Elliotson had dinner with us (he left for home yesterday morning), really helped; the change comes just in time, and I already feel somewhat lifted. . . . But I still have a bit of a headache, it hurts a lot sometimes, like now, though I haven't been cupped—yet. . . . I dreamed all last week that the Battle of Life was a series of rooms that were impossible to sort out or escape from, which I wandered through all night. On Saturday night, I don't think I slept at all. I was constantly going through the story, trying to fit the twists into the plot. The mental stress was absolutely terrible."
Of the "revolution" he had written to me a week before, from Lausanne; where the news had just reached them, that, upon the Federal Diet decreeing the expulsion of the Jesuits, the Roman Catholic cantons had risen against the decree, the result being that the Protestants had deposed the grand council and established a provisional government, dissolving the Catholic league. His interest in this, and prompt seizure of what really was brought into issue by the conflict, is every way characteristic of Dickens. "You will know," he wrote from Lausanne on the 11th of October, "long before you get this, all about the revolution[298] at Geneva. There were stories of plots against the Government when I was there, but I didn't believe them; for all sorts of lies are always afloat against the radicals, and wherever there is a consul from a Catholic Power the most monstrous fictions are in perpetual circulation against them: as in this very place, where the Sardinian consul was gravely whispering the other day that a society called the Homicides had been formed, whereof the president of the council of state, the O'Connell of Switzerland and a clever fellow, was a member; who were sworn on skulls and cross-bones to exterminate men of property, and so forth. There was a great stir here, on the day of the fight in Geneva. We heard the guns (they shook this house) all day; and seven hundred men marched out of this town of Lausanne to go and help the radical party—arriving at Geneva just after it was all over. There is no doubt they had received secret help from here; for a powder barrel, found by some of the Genevese populace with 'Canton de Vaud' painted on it, was carried on a pole about the streets as a standard, to show that they were sympathized with by friends outside. It was a poor mean fight enough, I am told by Lord Vernon, who was present and who was with us last night. The Government was afraid; having no confidence whatever, I dare say, in its own soldiers; and the cannon were fired everywhere except at the opposite party, who (I mean the revolutionists) had barricaded a bridge with an omnibus only, and certainly in the beginning might have been turned with ease. The precision of the common men with the rifle was especially shown by a small party of five, who waited on the ramparts near[299] one of the gates of the town, to turn a body of soldiery who were coming in to the Government assistance. They picked out every officer and struck him down instantly, the moment the party appeared; there were three or four of them; upon which the soldiers gravely turned round and walked off. I dare say there are not fifty men in this place who wouldn't click your card off a target a hundred and fifty yards away, at least. I have seen them, time after time, fire across a great ravine as wide as the ornamental ground in St. James's-park, and never miss the bull's-eye.
Of the "revolution" he wrote to me about a week ago from Lausanne, where they had just learned that, after the Federal Diet ordered the expulsion of the Jesuits, the Roman Catholic cantons had rebelled against this decision. This resulted in the Protestants deposing the grand council and setting up a provisional government, disbanding the Catholic league. His interest in this situation and quick understanding of what was truly at stake in the conflict is very much in line with Dickens's character. "You will know," he wrote from Lausanne on October 11th, "long before you get this, all about the revolution[298] in Geneva. There were rumors of plots against the Government while I was there, but I didn’t believe them, because all sorts of lies are always spreading about the radicals, and wherever there’s a consul from a Catholic Power, the most outrageous fictions circulate against them. Like in this very place, where the Sardinian consul was seriously whispering the other day that a society called the Homicides had been formed, whose president, the O'Connell of Switzerland and a clever guy, was a member; they were allegedly sworn on skulls and cross-bones to eliminate men of property, and so on. There was a lot of commotion here on the day of the fight in Geneva. We heard the guns (they shook this house) all day, and seven hundred men marched out of this town of Lausanne to support the radical party—arriving in Geneva just after everything was over. There’s no doubt they had received secret help from here; a powder barrel found by some of the Genevese people, marked 'Canton de Vaud,' was carried through the streets on a pole as a symbol that they had supporters from outside. It was a pretty weak fight, I’m told by Lord Vernon, who was there and was with us last night. The Government was scared, probably with no confidence in its own soldiers; cannons were fired all over except at the opposing side, who (the revolutionists) had barricaded a bridge with just an omnibus, and could certainly have been driven back easily at the start. The sharpshooting skills of the common men were especially evident with a small group of five, who waited on the ramparts near[299] one of the town's gates to confront a group of soldiers coming in to support the Government. They picked off every officer and took him down instantly the moment they spotted him; there were three or four of them, and then the soldiers turned around and left. I doubt there are even fifty men here who couldn't hit your card from a target a hundred and fifty yards away, at least. I’ve seen them, time after time, shoot across a ravine as wide as the ornamental grounds in St. James's Park, and never miss the bull's-eye.
"It is a horribly ungentlemanly thing to say here, though I do say it without the least reserve—but my sympathy is all with the radicals. I don't know any subject on which this indomitable people have so good a right to a strong feeling as Catholicity—if not as a religion, clearly as a means of social degradation. They know what it is. They live close to it. They have Italy beyond their mountains. They can compare the effect of the two systems at any time in their own valleys; and their dread of it, and their horror of the introduction of Catholic priests and emissaries into their towns, seems to me the most rational feeling in the world. Apart from this, you have no conception of the preposterous, insolent little aristocracy of Geneva: the most ridiculous caricature the fancy can suggest of what we know in England. I was talking to two famous gentlemen (very intelligent men) of that place, not long ago, who came over to invite me to a sort of reception there—which I declined. Really their talk about 'the people' and 'the masses,' and the necessity they would shortly be under of shooting a few of them as an example[300] for the rest, was a kind of monstrosity one might have heard at Genoa. The audacious insolence and contempt of the people by their newspapers, too, is quite absurd. It is difficult to believe that men of sense can be such donkeys politically. It was precisely such a state of things that brought about the change here. There was a most respectful petition presented on the Jesuit question, signed by its tens of thousands of small farmers; the regular peasants of the canton, all splendidly taught in public schools, and intellectually as well as physically a most remarkable body of labouring men. This document is treated by the gentlemanly party with the most sublime contempt, and the signatures are said to be the signatures of 'the rabble.' Upon which, each man of the rabble shoulders his rifle, and walks in upon a given day agreed upon among them to Lausanne; and the gentlemanly party walk out without striking a blow."
"It’s a really unrefined thing to say here, but I will say it openly—my support is entirely with the radicals. I can't think of any issue on which these resilient people have more right to feel strongly than Catholicism—if not as a religion, definitely as a way of social decline. They understand it. They live close to it. They have Italy just beyond their mountains. They can compare the effects of both systems anytime in their own valleys; their fear of it and their disgust at the idea of Catholic priests and agents coming into their towns seem to me to be the most sensible feelings in the world. Besides that, you have no idea about the ridiculous, arrogant little aristocracy of Geneva: it’s the most laughable caricature of what we know in England. I was recently speaking to two well-known gentlemen (very intelligent men) from that place who came over to invite me to some sort of gathering there—which I declined. Honestly, their talk about 'the people' and 'the masses,' and their belief that they would soon have to shoot a few of them as an example[300] for the others, was something you'd expect to hear in Genoa. The audacious arrogance and disdain for the people in their newspapers is also absolutely ridiculous. It’s hard to believe that sensible people can be so politically clueless. This exact situation is what led to the change here. There was a very respectful petition presented regarding the Jesuit issue, signed by tens of thousands of small farmers; the regular peasants of the canton, all exceptionally educated in public schools, and intellectually as well as physically a truly remarkable group of hardworking men. This document is treated by the upper-class party with the utmost contempt, and the signatures are dismissed as 'the rabble.' In response, each member of the rabble grabs his rifle and marches on an agreed day to Lausanne; and the upper-class party walks out without putting up a fight."
Such traces of the "revolution" as he found upon his present visit to Geneva he described in writing to me from the hotel de l'Ecu on the 20th of October. "You never would suppose from the look of this town that there had been anything revolutionary going on. Over the window of my old bedroom there is a great hole made by a cannon-ball in the house-front; and two of the bridges are under repair. But these are small tokens which anything else might have brought about as well. The people are all at work. The little streets are rife with every sight and sound of industry; the place is as quiet by ten o'clock as Lincoln's-inn-fields; and the only outward and visible sign of public interest in political events is a little group at every[301] street corner, reading a public announcement from the new Government of the forthcoming election of state-officers, in which the people are reminded of their importance as a republican institution, and desired to bear in mind their dignity in all their proceedings. Nothing very violent or bad could go on with a community so well educated as this. It is the best antidote to American experiences, conceivable. As to the nonsense 'the gentlemanly interest' talk about, their opposition to property and so forth, there never was such mortal absurdity. One of the principal leaders in the late movement has a stock of watches and jewellery here of immense value—and had, during the disturbance—perfectly unprotected. James Fahzey has a rich house and a valuable collection of pictures; and, I will be bound to say, twice as much to lose as half the conservative declaimers put together. This house, the liberal one, is one of the most richly furnished and luxurious hotels on the continent. And if I were a Swiss with a hundred thousand pounds, I would be as steady against the Catholic cantons and the propagation of Jesuitism as any radical among 'em: believing the dissemination of Catholicity to be the most horrible means of political and social degradation left in the world. Which these people, thoroughly well educated, know perfectly. . . . The boys of Geneva were very useful in bringing materials for the construction of the barricades on the bridges; and the enclosed song may amuse you. They sing it to a tune that dates from the great French Revolution—a very good one."
The traces of the "revolution" that he noticed during his recent visit to Geneva were shared with me in writing from the hotel de l'Ecu on October 20th. "You would never guess just by looking at this town that anything revolutionary had happened. Over the window of my old room, there’s a huge hole from a cannonball in the building's front; and two of the bridges are being repaired. But these are minor signs that could have resulted from anything else. The people are all busy working. The small streets are filled with every sight and sound of activity; the place is as quiet by ten o'clock as Lincoln's-inn-fields; and the only visible sign of public interest in political events is a small group at every[301] street corner, reading a public notice from the new Government about the upcoming election of state officials, reminding the people of their significance as a republican institution, and urging them to uphold their dignity in all their actions. Nothing too violent or bad could happen in a community this well-educated. It's the best antidote to American experiences, you can imagine. As for the nonsense that 'the gentlemanly interest' talks about, like their opposition to property and so on, it’s just pure absurdity. One of the main leaders in the recent movement has a stockpile of watches and jewelry here worth a fortune—and was completely unprotected during the disturbances. James Fahzey has a rich house and a valuable art collection; and I would bet he has twice as much to lose as half the conservative critics put together. This liberal house is one of the most luxurious hotels on the continent. If I were Swiss with a hundred thousand pounds, I would stand firm against the Catholic cantons and the spread of Jesuitism just like any radical among them, believing that spreading Catholicism is the worst means of political and social degradation left in the world. And these educated people know that perfectly well. The boys of Geneva were very helpful in gathering materials for the barricades on the bridges; and the enclosed song might entertain you. They sing it to a tune from the great French Revolution—a really good one."
But revolutions may be small as well as their heroes, and while he thus was sending me his Gamin de[302] Genève I was sending him news of a sudden change in Whitefriars which had quite as vivid interest for him. Not much could be told him at first, but his curiosity instantly arose to fever pitch. "In reference to that Daily News revolution," he wrote from Geneva on the 26th, "I have been walking and wondering all day through a perfect Miss Burney's Vauxhall of conjectural dark walks. Heaven send you enlighten me fully on Wednesday, or number three will suffer!" Two days later he resumed, as he was beginning his journey back to Lausanne. "I am in a great state of excitement on account of your intelligence, and desperately anxious to know all about it. I shall be put out to an unspeakable extent if I don't find your letter awaiting me. God knows there has been small comfort for either of us in the D. N.'s nine months." There was not much to tell then, and there is less now; but at last the discomfort was over for us both, as I had been unable to reconcile myself to a longer continuance of the service I had given in Whitefriars since he quitted it. The subject may be left with the remark made upon it in his first letter after returning to Rosemont. "I certainly am very glad of the result of the Daily News business, though my gladness is dashed with melancholy to think that you should have toiled there so long, to so little purpose. I escaped more easily. However, it is all past now. . . . As to the undoubted necessity of the course you took, I have not a grain of question in my mind. That, being what you are, you had only one course to take and have taken it, I no more doubt than that the Old Bailey is not Westminster Abbey. In the utmost sum at which you value[303] yourself, you were bound to leave; and now you have left, you will come to Paris, and there, and at home again, we'll have, please God, the old kind of evenings and the old life again, as it used to be before those daily nooses caught us by the legs and sometimes tripped us up. Make a vow (as I have done) never to go down that court with the little news-shop at the corner, any more, and let us swear by Jack Straw as in the ancient times. . . . I am beginning to get over my sorrow for your nights up aloft in Whitefriars, and to feel nothing but happiness in the contemplation of your enfranchisement. God bless you!"
But revolutions can be small, just like their heroes, and while he was sending me his Gamin de[302] Genève, I was sharing news with him about a sudden change in Whitefriars that I knew would interest him just as much. At first, there wasn't much to share, but his curiosity quickly reached a fever pitch. "Regarding that Daily News revolution," he wrote from Geneva on the 26th, "I've been wandering all day through a perfect Miss Burney's Vauxhall of speculative dark paths. I hope you can give me a full update on Wednesday, or number three will be upset!" Two days later, he wrote again as he was starting his journey back to Lausanne. "I'm really excited about your news and desperately want to know all about it. I’ll be extremely disappointed if I don’t find your letter waiting for me. God knows there hasn't been much comfort for either of us in the D. N.'s nine months." There wasn’t much to tell back then, and there’s even less now; but finally, the discomfort was over for both of us, as I could no longer accept the continuation of the work I had done in Whitefriars since he left. The topic can be left with his comment in his first letter after getting back to Rosemont. "I’m really glad about the outcome of the Daily News situation, though I feel a bit sad thinking about how long you had to work there for so little result. I had an easier time. Anyway, it’s all in the past now. . . . I have no doubt that you had no choice but to take the route you did. Given who you are, it was the only option for you, just as I’m sure the Old Bailey isn’t Westminster Abbey. At the very least, you had to leave; and now that you have, you’ll come to Paris, and there, and at home again, we’ll hopefully have our old evenings and life back, like it was before those daily nooses caught us by the legs and sometimes tripped us up. Let's make a vow (like I have) never to go down that court with the little newsstand at the corner again, and let’s swear by Jack Straw as in the old days. . . . I’m starting to get over my sadness about your nights spent in Whitefriars and feeling nothing but happiness at the thought of your freedom. God bless you!"
The time was now shortening for him at Lausanne; but before my sketches of his pleasant days there close, the little story of his Christmas book may be made complete by a few extracts from the letters that followed immediately upon the departure of the Talfourds. Without comment they will explain its closing touches, his own consciousness of the difficulties in working out the tale within limits too confined not to render its proper development imperfect, and his ready tact in dealing with objection and suggestion from without. His condition while writing it did not warrant me in pressing what I might otherwise have thought necessary; but as the little story finally left his hands, it had points not unworthy of him; and a sketch of its design will render the fragments from his letters more intelligible. I read it lately with a sense that its general tone of quiet beauty deserved well the praise which Jeffrey in those days had given it. "I like and admire the Battle extremely," he said in a letter on its publication, sent me by Dickens and not included in Lord[304] Cockburn's Memoir. "It is better than any other man alive could have written, and has passages as fine as anything that ever came from the man himself. The dance of the sisters in that autumn orchard is of itself worth a dozen inferior tales, and their reunion at the close, and indeed all the serious parts, are beautiful, some traits of Clemency charming."
The time was now getting shorter for him in Lausanne; but before I wrap up my notes about his enjoyable days there, I can complete the little story of his Christmas book with a few excerpts from the letters that came right after the Talfourds left. Without any comments, they will shed light on its finishing touches, his awareness of the challenges in developing the story within limits that made its proper growth feel incomplete, and his quick skill in handling outside objections and suggestions. His situation while writing it didn’t allow me to press on what I might have thought necessary otherwise; but as the little story finally left his hands, it had qualities that were worthy of him; and a summary of its design will help make the snippets from his letters clearer. I read it recently and felt that its overall tone of quiet beauty truly deserved the praise Jeffrey had given it back then. "I like and admire the Battle extremely," he wrote in a letter on its release, which was sent to me by Dickens and isn't included in Lord[304] Cockburn's Memoir. "It is better than anything any other man alive could have written, and has passages as fine as anything that ever came from the man himself. The dance of the sisters in that autumn orchard alone is worth a dozen lesser tales, and their reunion at the end, along with all the serious parts, are beautiful, with some traits of Clemency being quite charming."
Yet it was probably here the fact, as with the Chimes, that the serious parts were too much interwoven with the tale to render the subject altogether suitable to the old mirth-bringing season; but this had also some advantages. The story is all about two sisters, the younger of whom, Marion, sacrifices her own affection to give happiness to the elder, Grace. But Grace had already made the same sacrifice for this younger sister; life's first and hardest battle had been won by her before the incidents begin; and when she is first seen, she is busying herself to bring about her sister's marriage with Alfred Heathfield, whom she has herself loved, and whom she has kept wholly unconscious, by a quiet change in her bearing to him, of what his own still disengaged heart would certainly not have rejected. Marion, however, had earlier discovered this, though it is not until her victory over herself that Alfred knows it; and meanwhile he is become her betrothed. The sisters thus shown at the opening, one believing her love undiscovered and the other bent for the sake of that love on surrendering her own, each practising concealment and both unselfishly true, form a pretty and tender picture. The second part is intended to give to Marion's flight the character of an elopement; and so to manage this as to show her all the time unchanged[305] to the man she is pledged to, yet flying from, was the author's difficulty. One Michael Warden is the deus ex machinâ by whom it is solved, hardly with the usual skill; but there is much art in rendering his pretensions to the hand of Marion, whose husband he becomes after an interval of years, the means of closing against him all hope of success, in the very hour when her own act might seem to be opening it to him. During the same interval Grace, believing Marion to be gone with Warden, becomes Alfred's wife; and not until reunion after six years' absence is the truth entirely known to her. The struggle, to all of them, has been filled and chastened with sorrow; but joy revisits them at its close. Hearts are not broken by the duties laid upon them; nor is life shown to be such a perishable holiday, that amidst noble sorrow and generous self-denial it must lose its capacity for happiness. The tale thus justifies its place in the Christmas series. What Jeffrey says of Clemency, too, may suggest another word. The story would not be Dickens's if we could not discover in it the power peculiar to him of presenting the commonest objects with freshness and beauty, of detecting in the homeliest forms of life much of its rarest loveliness, and of springing easily upward from everyday realities into regions of imaginative thought. To this happiest direction of his art, Clemency and her husband render new tribute; and in her more especially, once again, we recognize one of those true souls who fill so large a space in his writings, for whom the lowest seats at life's feasts are commonly kept, but whom he moves and welcomes to a more fitting place among the prized and honoured at the upper tables.[306]
Yet it was probably here, like in the Chimes, that the serious parts were too much intertwined with the story to make the subject entirely appropriate for the old joyful season; but this did have some advantages. The story revolves around two sisters, the younger of whom, Marion, sacrifices her own happiness to ensure the happiness of the elder, Grace. But Grace had already made the same sacrifice for her younger sister; life's first and hardest struggle was won by her before the events start; and when we first see her, she is working to arrange her sister's marriage with Alfred Heathfield, whom she herself loves, and whom she has kept completely unaware, due to a subtle change in her behavior towards him, of what his own still available heart would definitely not have rejected. Marion, however, discovered this earlier, although it isn't until her victory over her own feelings that Alfred learns of it; and in the meantime, he has become her fiancé. The sisters, shown at the beginning—one believing her love is hidden and the other determined to surrender her own for that love—each practicing concealment and both selflessly true, create a sweet and tender picture. The second part aims to characterize Marion's escape as an elopement; and managing this to show her all the while unchanged to the man she is engaged to, yet fleeing from, was the author's challenge. A character named Michael Warden serves as the deus ex machina who solves this, albeit not with the usual finesse; but there is skill in depicting his claims to Marion’s hand, which he eventually marries after several years, as simultaneously closing off all hope of success for him, at the very moment when her own actions might seem to open it to him. In that same time, Grace, believing Marion to have left with Warden, becomes Alfred's wife; and not until they are reunited after six years apart does she learn the whole truth. The struggle has been filled and refined with sorrow for all of them; but joy returns at the end. Hearts are not shattered by the responsibilities placed upon them; nor is life portrayed as such a fragile celebration that, amidst noble sorrow and generous self-denial, it must lose its ability to bring happiness. The tale thus validates its place in the Christmas series. What Jeffrey says about Clemency may suggest another thought. The story wouldn't be Dickens's if we couldn't recognize in it his unique ability to present everyday objects with freshness and beauty, to find rare loveliness in the simplest aspects of life, and easily leap from mundane realities into imaginative realms. In this most favorable direction of his art, Clemency and her husband offer new tribute; especially in her, we once again recognize one of those genuine characters who occupy a significant space in his writings, for whom the lowest seats at life's gatherings are typically reserved, but whom he elevates and welcomes to a more suitable place among the prized and honored at the higher tables.[306]
"I wonder whether you foresaw the end of the Christmas book! There are two or three places in which I can make it prettier, I think, by slight alterations. . . . I trust to Heaven you may like it. What an affecting story I could have made of it in one octavo volume. Oh to think of the printers transforming my kindly cynical old father into Doctor Taddler!" (28th of October.)
"I wonder if you saw the end of the Christmas book coming! There are a couple of places where I think I can make it nicer with a few small changes. I really hope you like it. What a touching story I could have created in one octavo volume. Just imagine the printers turning my warm-heartedly cynical old dad into Doctor Taddler!" (28th of October.)
"Do you think it worth while, in the illustrations, to throw the period back at all for the sake of anything good in the costume? The story may have happened at any time within a hundred years. Is it worth having coats and gowns of dear old Goldsmith's day? or thereabouts? I really don't know what to say. The probability is, if it has not occurred to you or to the artists, that it is hardly worth considering; but I ease myself of it by throwing it out to you. It may be already too late, or you may see reason to think it best to 'stick to the last' (I feel it necessary to italicize the joke), and abide by the ladies' and gentlemen's spring and winter fashions of this time. Whatever you think best, in this as in all other things, is best, I am sure. . . . I would go, in the illustrations, for 'beauty' as much as possible; and I should like each part to have a general illustration to it at the beginning, shadowing out its drift and bearing: much as Browne goes at that kind of thing on Dombey covers. I don't think I should fetter your discretion in the matter farther. The better it is illustrated, the better I shall be pleased of course." (29th of October.)[307]
"Do you think it’s worthwhile, in the illustrations, to set the time back for the sake of any good in the costume? The story could take place at any time within the last hundred years. Is it worth including outfits from the charming era of Goldsmith? I really don't know what to say. If it hasn't occurred to you or the artists, it's probably not worth considering, but I'm throwing it out there for you to think about. It might already be too late, or you might find it best to 'stick to the last' (I feel the need to italicize the joke) and go with the current spring and winter fashions. Whatever you decide, I trust that it is the best choice, just like with everything else. . . . For the illustrations, I would aim for 'beauty' as much as possible, and I would like each section to have a general illustration at the start that captures its essence and direction, much like how Browne does for the Dombey covers. I don’t think I should limit your discretion on this further. The better the illustrations, the more pleased I will be, of course." (29th of October.)[307]
" . . . I only write to say that it is of no use my writing at length, until I have heard from you; and that I will wait until I shall have read your promised communication (as my father would call it) to-morrow. I have glanced over the proofs of the last part and really don't wonder, some of the most extravagant mistakes occurring in Clemency's account to Warden, that the marriage of Grace and Alfred should seem rather unsatisfactory to you. Whatever is done about that must be done with the lightest hand, for the reader must take something for granted; but I think it next to impossible, without dreadful injury to the effect, to introduce a scene between Marion and Michael. The introduction must be in the scene between the sisters, and must be put, mainly, into the mouth of Grace. Rely upon it there is no other way, in keeping with the spirit of the tale. With this amendment, and a touch here and there in the last part (I know exactly where they will come best), I think it may be pretty and affecting, and comfortable too. . . ." (31st of October.)
"... I'm just writing to say it’s not really productive for me to write at length until I hear from you; and I’ll wait until I read your promised message (as my dad would say) tomorrow. I’ve skimmed through the proofs of the last part, and I honestly can’t blame you for finding the marriage of Grace and Alfred a bit unsatisfactory, given some of the wild mistakes in Clemency’s account to Warden. Whatever we decide about that needs to be handled delicately, because the reader has to take some things for granted; but I think it's nearly impossible, without seriously damaging the story, to add a scene between Marion and Michael. The introduction needs to happen in the scene between the sisters and should mostly come from Grace’s perspective. Trust me, that’s the only way that fits with the spirit of the story. With this change and a few adjustments here and there in the last part (I know exactly where they’ll fit best), I believe it can be quite beautiful, touching, and also reassuring..." (31st of October.)
" . . . I shall hope to touch upon the Christmas book as soon as I get your opinion. I wouldn't do it without. I am delighted to hear of noble old Stanny. Give my love to him, and tell him I think of turning Catholic. It strikes me (it may have struck you perhaps) that another good place for introducing a few lines of dialogue, is at the beginning of the scene between Grace and her husband, where he speaks about the messenger at the gate." (4th of November.)[308]
" . . . I hope to talk about the Christmas book as soon as I get your thoughts on it. I wouldn’t do it without your input. I’m glad to hear about the wonderful old Stanny. Send him my love, and let him know I’m thinking about becoming Catholic. It occurs to me (maybe it has to you too) that another good spot for adding some dialogue is at the beginning of the scene between Grace and her husband, where he mentions the messenger at the gate." (4th of November.)[308]
"Before I reply to your questions I wish to remark generally of the third part that all the passion that can be got into it, through my interpretation at all events, is there. I know that, by what it cost me; and I take it to be, as a question of art and interest, in the very nature of the story that it should move at a swift pace after the sisters are in each other's arms again. Anything after that would drag like lead, and must. . . . Now for your questions. I don't think any little scene with Marion and anybody can prepare the way for the last paragraph of the tale: I don't think anything but a printer's line can go between it and Warden's speech. A less period than ten years? Yes. I see no objection to six. I have no doubt you are right. Any word from Alfred in his misery? Impossible: you might as well try to speak to somebody in an express train. The preparation for his change is in the first part, and he kneels down beside her in that return scene. He is left alone with her, as it were, in the world. I am quite confident it is wholly impossible for me to alter that. . . . BUT (keep your eye on me) when Marion went away, she left a letter for Grace in which she charged her to encourage the love that Alfred would conceive for her, and forewarned her that years would pass before they met again, &c. &c. This coming out in the scene between the sisters, and something like it being expressed in the opening of the little scene between Grace and her husband before the messenger at the gate, will make (I hope) a prodigious difference; and I will try to put in something with Aunt Martha and the Doctor which shall carry the tale back more distinctly and unmistakeably to the battle-ground. I hope to make[309] these alterations next week, and to send the third part back to you before I leave here. If you think it can still be improved after that, say so to me in Paris and I will go at it again. I wouldn't have it limp, if it can fly. I say nothing to you of a great deal of this being already expressed in the sentiment of the beginning, because your delicate perception knows all that already. Observe for the artists. Grace will now only have one child—little Marion." . . . (At night, on same day.) . . . "You recollect that I asked you to read it all together, for I knew that I was working for that? But I have no doubt of your doubts, and will do what I have said. . . . I had thought of marking the time in the little story, and will do so. . . . Think, once more, of the period between the second and third parts. I will do the same." (7th of November.)
"Before I answer your questions, I want to generally comment on the third part: all the emotion that can be packed into it, at least through my interpretation, is there. I know this from what it cost me; and I believe, as a matter of artistry and engagement, it's essential for the story to move quickly after the sisters reunite. Anything beyond that would drag on and must. . . . Now, onto your questions. I don’t think any small scene with Marion and anyone else can set the stage for the final paragraph of the tale: I believe only a printer's line should come between it and Warden's speech. A shorter time than ten years? Yes. I see no problem with six. I'm sure you're right. Any word from Alfred in his anguish? Impossible: it’s like trying to talk to someone on an express train. The groundwork for his change is laid in the first part, and he kneels beside her in that reunion scene. He’s left alone with her, in a way, in the world. I’m completely confident I can't change that. . . . BUT (pay attention to me) when Marion left, she wrote a letter for Grace, urging her to nurture the love that Alfred would grow for her, and warned in advance her that years would pass before they saw each other again, etc., etc. This coming out in the scene between the sisters, and something similar expressed at the start of the brief scene between Grace and her husband before the messenger at the gate, should (I hope) make a huge difference; and I will try to include something with Aunt Martha and the Doctor that clearly ties the story back to the battlefield. I hope to make[309] these changes next week and send the third part back to you before I leave here. If you think it can still be improved after that, let me know when I’m in Paris and I’ll work on it again. I don’t want it to be dull if it can be exciting. I won’t mention that much of this is already expressed in the sentiment at the beginning because your keen perception knows all that already. Just a note for the artists: Grace will now only have one child—little Marion." . . . (At night, on the same day.) . . . "You remember I asked you to read it all together because I knew I was working towards that? But I have no doubt about your doubts, and will do what I said. . . . I planned to mark the time in the little story, and I will do so. . . . Think again about the timeframe between the second and third parts. I will do the same." (7th of November.)
"I hope you will think the third part (when you read it in type with these amendments) very much improved. I think it so. If there should still be anything wanting, in your opinion, pray suggest it to me in Paris. I am bent on having it right, if I can. . . . If in going over the proofs you find the tendency to blank verse (I cannot help it, when I am very much in earnest) too strong, knock out a word's brains here and there." (13th of November. Sending the proofs back.)
"I hope you think the third part (when you read it in print with these updates) is much improved. I believe it is. If there's anything you think is still missing, please let me know when you're in Paris. I'm determined to get it right, if I can. . . . If while going over the proofs you find the tendency toward blank verse (I can't help it when I'm really serious) is too strong, feel free to cut out a word or two here and there." (13th of November. Sending the proofs back.)
". . . Your Christmas book illustration-news makes me jump for joy. I will write you at length to-morrow. I should like this dedication: This Christmas Book is cordially inscribed To my English Friends in Switzerland.[310] Just those two lines, and nothing more. When I get the proofs again I think I may manage another word or two about the battle-field, with advantage. I am glad you like the alterations. I feel that they make it complete, and that it would have been incomplete without your suggestions." (21st of November. From Paris.)
. . . Your Christmas book illustration news makes me really happy. I'll write you a long message tomorrow. I would like this dedication: This Christmas Book is sincerely dedicated to my English Friends in Switzerland.[310] Just those two lines, and nothing more. When I get the proofs again, I think I can add another word or two about the battlefield, which will be beneficial. I'm glad you like the changes. I feel that they complete it, and that it would have been incomplete without your suggestions. (21st of November. From Paris.)
I had managed, as a glad surprise for him, to enlist both Stanfield and Maclise in the illustration of the story, in addition to the distinguished artists whom the publishers had engaged for it, Leech and Richard Doyle; and among the subjects contributed by Stanfield are three morsels of English landscape which had a singular charm for Dickens at the time, and seem to me still of their kind quite faultless. I may add a curious fact, never mentioned until now. In the illustration which closes the second part of the story, where the festivities to welcome the bridegroom at the top of the page contrast with the flight of the bride represented below, Leech made the mistake of supposing that Michael Warden had taken part in the elopement, and has introduced his figure with that of Marion. We did not discover this until too late for remedy, the publication having then been delayed, for these drawings, to the utmost limit; and it is highly characteristic of Dickens, and of the true regard he had for this fine artist, that, knowing the pain he must give in such circumstances by objection or complaint, he preferred to pass it silently. Nobody made remark upon it, and there the illustration still stands; but any one who reads the tale carefully will at once perceive what havoc it makes of one of the most delicate turns in it.[311]
I had managed, as a nice surprise for him, to get both Stanfield and Maclise to illustrate the story, along with the well-known artists hired by the publishers, Leech and Richard Doyle. Among the pieces contributed by Stanfield are three bits of English landscape that had a special charm for Dickens at the time, and I still think they are quite perfect. I should mention an interesting fact that hasn't been noted until now. In the illustration that ends the second part of the story, where the celebrations to welcome the groom are shown at the top of the page, contrasting with the bride’s escape depicted below, Leech mistakenly thought that Michael Warden was involved in the elopement, and he included his figure alongside Marion. We didn’t realize this until it was too late to fix, as the publication had already been delayed as much as possible for these drawings. It's very typical of Dickens, and shows how much he respected this talented artist, that he chose to keep quiet about the mistake rather than cause any discomfort by complaining. No one commented on it, and the illustration remains as it is; but anyone who reads the story closely will quickly see how it disrupts one of the most delicate parts of it.[311]
"When I first saw it, it was with a horror and agony not to be expressed. Of course I need not tell you, my dear fellow, Warden has no business in the elopement scene. He was never there! In the first hot sweat of this surprise and novelty, I was going to implore the printing of that sheet to be stopped, and the figure taken out of the block. But when I thought of the pain this might give to our kind-hearted Leech; and that what is such a monstrous enormity to me, as never having entered my brain, may not so present itself to others, I became more composed: though the fact is wonderful to me. No doubt a great number of copies will be printed by the time this reaches you, and therefore I shall take it for granted that it stands as it is. Leech otherwise is very good, and the illustrations altogether are by far the best that have been done for any of the Christmas books. You know how I build up temples in my mind that are not made with hands (or expressed with pen and ink, I am afraid), and how liable I am to be disappointed in these things. But I really am not disappointed in this case. Quietness and beauty are preserved throughout. Say everything to Mac and Stanny, more than everything! It is a delight to look at these little landscapes of the dear old boy. How gentle and elegant, and yet how manly and vigorous, they are! I have a perfect joy in them."
"When I first saw it, I was filled with a horror and agony that I can't describe. Of course, I don't need to tell you, my dear friend, Warden has no place in the elopement scene. He was never there! In that first overwhelming moment of shock and surprise, I almost begged them to stop printing that page and remove the figure from the block. But then I thought about the pain this might cause our kind-hearted Leech; and what seems like a monstrous issue to me—something that has never even crossed my mind—may not come off the same way to others, so I calmed down a bit. Still, the fact is astonishing to me. No doubt many copies will be printed by the time this reaches you, so I’ll assume it stays as it is. Otherwise, Leech is doing great, and the illustrations are definitely the best done for any of the Christmas books. You know how I build imaginary temples in my mind that aren't made with hands (or written down properly, I’m afraid), and how I often end up disappointed. But I really am not disappointed in this case. The quietness and beauty are maintained throughout. Please tell Mac and Stanny everything, more than everything! It's a joy to look at these little landscapes from the dear old boy. They are so gentle and elegant, yet so manly and vigorous! I take great joy in them."
Of the few days that remained of his Lausanne life, before he journeyed to Paris, there is not much requiring to be said. His work had continued during the whole of the month before departure to occupy him so entirely as to leave room for little else, and even occasional letters to very dear friends at home were[312] intermitted. Here is one example of many. "I will write to Landor as soon as I can possibly make time, but I really am so much at my desk perforce, and so full of work, whether I am there or elsewhere, between the Christmas book and Dombey, that it is the most difficult thing in the world for me to make up my mind to write a letter to any one but you. I ought to have written to Macready. I wish you would tell him, with my love, how I am situated in respect of pen, ink, and paper. One of the Lausanne papers, treating of free trade, has been very copious lately in its mention of Lord Gobden. Fact; and I think it a good name." Then, as the inevitable time approached, he cast about him for such comfort as the coming change might bring, to set against the sorrow of it; and began to think of Paris, "'in a less romantic and more homely contemplation of the picture,'" as not wholly undesirable. I have no doubt that constant change, too, is indispensable to me when I am at work: and at times something more than a doubt will force itself upon me whether there is not something in a Swiss valley that disagrees with me. Certainly, whenever I live in Switzerland again, it shall be on the hill-top. Something of the goître and cretin influence seems to settle on my spirits sometimes, on the lower ground.[129] How[313] sorry, ah yes! how sorry I shall be to leave the little society nevertheless. We have been thoroughly good-humoured and agreeable together, and I'll always give a hurrah for the Swiss and Switzerland."
Of the few days left of his life in Lausanne before heading to Paris, not much needs to be said. He was so absorbed in his work throughout the month leading up to his departure that there was little room for anything else, and even occasional letters to very dear friends back home were put on hold. Here’s an example of many: "I’ll write to Landor as soon as I can make time, but I’m really at my desk all the time, so busy with work, whether I’m here or not, juggling the Christmas book and Dombey, that it's incredibly hard for me to sit down and write a letter to anyone but you. I should have written to Macready. Please tell him, with my love, how I'm managing with pen, ink, and paper. One of the Lausanne papers has been very vocal lately about free trade and has mentioned Lord Gobden quite a lot. It’s true, and I think it’s a good name." As the inevitable time approached, he looked for whatever comfort the change might bring to offset the sadness of leaving; he began to think of Paris, "'in a less romantic and more practical way,'" as being not entirely undesirable. I’m sure that constant change is essential for me while I'm working, and sometimes I can’t help but wonder if there's something about being in a Swiss valley that doesn’t suit me. Definitely, the next time I live in Switzerland, it will be on a hilltop. There’s something about the goître and cretin influence that seems to weigh down my spirits sometimes when I'm in the lowlands.[129] How[313] sad, oh yes! how sad I’ll be to leave the little community nonetheless. We’ve all been really good-natured and friendly together, and I’ll always cheer for the Swiss and Switzerland."
One or two English travelling by Lausanne had meanwhile greeted him as they were passing home, and a few days given him by Elliotson had been an enjoyment without a drawback. It was now the later autumn, very high winds were coursing through the valley, and his last letter but one described the change which these approaches of winter were making in the scene. "We have had some tremendous hurricanes at Lausanne. It is an extraordinary place now for wind, being peculiarly situated among mountains—between the Jura, and the Simplon, St. Gothard, St. Bernard, and Mont Blanc ranges; and at night you would swear (lying in bed) you were at sea. You cannot imagine wind blowing so, over earth. It is very fine to hear. The weather generally, however, has been excellent. There is snow on the tops of nearly all the hills, but none has fallen in the valley. On a bright day, it is quite hot between eleven and half past two. The nights and mornings are cold. For the last two or three days, it has been thick weather; and I can see no more of Mont Blanc from where I am writing now than if I were in Devonshire terrace, though last week it bounded all the Lausanne walks. I would give a great deal that you could take a walk with me about Lausanne on a clear cold day. It is impossible to imagine anything more noble and beautiful than the scene; and the autumn colours in the foliage are more brilliant and vivid now than any description could[314] convey to you. I took Elliotson, when he was with us, up to a ravine I had found out in the hills eight hundred or a thousand feet deep! Its steep sides dyed bright yellow, and deep red, by the changing leaves; a sounding torrent rolling down below; the lake of Geneva lying at its foot; one enormous mass and chaos of trees at its upper end; and mountain piled on mountain in the distance, up into the sky! He really was struck silent by its majesty and splendour."
One or two English travelers passing through Lausanne had waved at him on their way home, and the few days he spent with Elliotson were thoroughly enjoyable. It was now late autumn, and strong winds were sweeping through the valley. His second-to-last letter described how the approach of winter was changing the landscape. "We’ve experienced some intense storms at Lausanne. It’s an incredible spot for wind, situated uniquely among mountains—between the Jura, Simplon, St. Gothard, St. Bernard, and Mont Blanc ranges; and at night, you’d swear (while lying in bed) that you were at sea. You wouldn’t believe how the wind blows across the land. It sounds amazing. Overall, the weather has been great. There’s snow on the peaks of nearly all the hills, but none has fallen in the valley. On sunny days, it can get quite hot between eleven and half past two, but the nights and mornings are chilly. For the past two or three days, it’s been foggy, and I can see no more of Mont Blanc from where I’m writing now than if I were on Devonshire Terrace, although last week it framed all the walks in Lausanne. I would give a lot for you to walk with me around Lausanne on a clear, cold day. You can’t imagine anything more magnificent and beautiful than the view; the autumn colors in the leaves are more vibrant and brilliant now than any description could convey. I took Elliotson, when he was with us, up to a ravine I found in the hills that was eight hundred or a thousand feet deep! Its steep sides were bright yellow and deep red from the changing leaves; a roaring torrent flowed below; the lake of Geneva lay at its base; an immense chaos of trees filled the upper end; and mountains stacked upon mountains in the distance, reaching up into the sky! He was truly speechless at its grandeur and beauty."
He had begun his third number of Dombey on the 26th of October, on the 4th of the following month he was half through it, on the 7th he was in the "agonies" of its last chapter, and on the 9th, one day before that proposed for its completion, all was done. This was marvellously rapid work, after what else he had undergone; but within a week, Monday the 16th being the day for departure, they were to strike their tents, and troubled and sad were the few days thus left him for preparation and farewell. He included in his leave-taking his deaf, dumb, and blind friends; and, to use his own homely phrase, was yet more terribly "down in the mouth" at taking leave of his hearing, speaking, and seeing friends. "I shall see you soon, please God, and that sets all to rights. But I don't believe there are many dots on the map of the world where we shall have left such affectionate remembrances behind us, as in Lausanne. It was quite miserable this last night, when we left them at Haldimand's."
He started his third installment of Dombey on October 26th, and by the 4th of the next month, he was halfway through it. On the 7th, he was in the "agonies" of writing the final chapter, and by the 9th—just a day before he planned to finish—all was complete. This was incredibly fast work, considering everything else he had been through. But within a week, on Monday the 16th, they were set to pack up their things, and the few days left for him to prepare and say goodbye were filled with worry and sadness. He said farewell to his deaf, dumb, and blind friends, and, to use his own simple words, he felt even more "down in the mouth" saying goodbye to his hearing, speaking, and seeing friends. "I shall see you soon, please God, and that makes everything right. But I don't think there are many places on the map of the world where we will leave such loving memories behind as we have in Lausanne. It was truly miserable that last night when we left them at Haldimand's."
He shall himself describe how they travelled post to Paris, occupying five days. "We got through the journey charmingly, though not quite so quickly as we hoped. The children as good as usual, and even Skittles[315] jolly to the last. (That name has long superseded Sampson Brass, by the bye. I call him so, from something skittle-playing and public-housey in his countenance.) We have been up at five every morning, and on the road before seven. We were three carriages: a sort of wagon, with a cabriolet attached, for the luggage; a ramshackle villainous old swing upon wheels (hired at Geneva), for the children; and for ourselves, that travelling chariot which I was so kind as to bring here for sale. It was very cold indeed crossing the Jura—nothing but fog and frost; but when we were out of Switzerland and across the French frontier, it became warmer, and continued so. We stopped at between six and seven each evening; had two rather queer inns, wild French country inns; but the rest good. They were three hours and a half examining the luggage at the frontier custom-house—atop of a mountain, in a hard and biting frost; where Anne and Roche had sharp work I assure you, and the latter insisted on volunteering the most astonishing and unnecessary lies about my books, for the mere pleasure of deceiving the officials. When we were out of the mountain country, we came at a good pace, but were a day late in getting to our hotel here."
He will describe how they traveled by post to Paris, taking five days. "We made the journey quite nicely, although not as quickly as we hoped. The kids were good as always, and even Skittles[315] was cheerful to the end. (That name has long replaced Sampson Brass, by the way. I call him that because he has a look that reminds me of playing skittles and hanging out in pubs.) We got up at five every morning and were on the road before seven. We had three vehicles: a sort of wagon with a cabriolet attached for the luggage; a rickety old junker on wheels (rented in Geneva) for the kids; and for ourselves, that traveling chariot I was kind enough to bring here for sale. It was really cold crossing the Jura—just fog and frost; but once we were out of Switzerland and across the French border, it got warmer and stayed that way. We stopped between six and seven every evening; had two rather strange inns, wild French country inns; but the rest were good. They took three and a half hours to inspect the luggage at the customs house on top of a mountain, in a biting frost; where Anne and Roche had a tough time, I assure you, and Roche even insisted on telling the most outrageous and unnecessary lies about my books, just for the fun of fooling the officials. Once we were out of the mountainous area, we made good time, but we arrived a day late at our hotel here."
They were in Paris when that was written; at the hotel Brighton; which they had reached in the evening of Friday the 20th of November.
They were in Paris when that was written, at the Hotel Brighton, which they had arrived at on the evening of Friday, November 20th.
CHAPTER XV.
THREE MONTHS IN PARIS.
1846-1847.
No man enjoyed brief residence in a hotel more than Dickens, but "several tons of luggage, other tons of servants, and other tons of children" are not desirable accompaniments to this kind of life; and his first day in Paris did not close before he had offered for an "eligible mansion." That same Saturday night he took a "colossal" walk about the city, of which the brilliancy and brightness almost frightened him; and among other things that attracted his notice was "rather a good book announced in a bookseller's window as Les Mystères de Londres par Sir Trollopp. Do you know him?" A countryman better known had given him earlier greeting. "The first man who took hold of me in the street, immediately outside this door, was[317] Bruffum in his check trousers, and without the proper number of buttons on his shirt, who was going away this morning, he told me, but coming back in two months, when we would go and dine—at some place known to him and fame."
No man enjoyed a short stay in a hotel more than Dickens, but "a ton of luggage, even more tons of servants, and even more tons of children" aren't ideal companions for this kind of lifestyle; and by the end of his first day in Paris, he had already expressed interest in an "eligible mansion." That same Saturday night, he took a "colossal" walk around the city, where the brilliance and brightness nearly overwhelmed him; among other things that caught his attention was "a pretty good book advertised in a bookseller's window as Les Mystères de Londres par Sir Trollopp. Do you know him?" An acquaintance from back home had greeted him earlier. "The first person who approached me in the street, right outside this door, was[317] Bruffum in his checkered pants, and with fewer buttons on his shirt than he should have had, who told me he was leaving this morning but would be back in two months, when we could go out to dinner—at some place he knows and is famous for."
Next day he took another long walk about the streets, and lost himself fifty times. This was Sunday, and he hardly knew what to say of it, as he saw it there and then. The bitter observance of that day he always sharply resisted, believing a little rational enjoyment to be not opposed to either rest or religion; but here was another matter. "The dirty churches, and the clattering carts and waggons, and the open shops (I don't think I passed fifty shut up, in all my strollings in and out), and the work-a-day dresses and drudgeries, are not comfortable. Open theatres and so forth I am well used to, of course, by this time; but so much toil and sweat on what one would like to see, apart from religious observances, a sensible holiday, is painful."
The next day, he took another long walk around the streets and got lost fifty times. It was Sunday, and he found it hard to articulate his feelings about it as he experienced it. He always strongly resisted the dreary observance of that day, believing that a bit of reasonable enjoyment wasn’t opposed to either rest or religion; but this was different. “The filthy churches, the noisy carts and wagons, and the open shops (I don’t think I saw fifty closed, during all my wandering in and out), along with the everyday clothes and chores, just aren't pleasant. I'm used to open theaters and stuff like that by now; but seeing so much hard work and sweat when you want to just enjoy a day off, away from religious practices, is upsetting.”
The date of his letter was the 22nd of November, and it had three postscripts.[130] The first, "Monday afternoon," told me a house was taken; that, unless the agreement should break off on any unforeseen fight[318] between Roche and the agent ("a French Mrs. Gamp"), I was to address him at No. 48, Rue de Courcelles, Faubourg St. Honoré; and that he would merely then advert to the premises as in his belief the "most ridiculous, extraordinary, unparalleled, and preposterous" in the whole world; being something between a baby-house, a "shades," a haunted castle, and a mad kind of clock. "They belong to a Marquis Castellan, and you will be ready to die of laughing when you go over them." The second P.S. declared that his lips should be sealed till I beheld for myself. "By Heaven it is not to be imagined by the mind of man!" The third P.S. closed the letter. "One room is a tent. Another room is a grove. Another room is a scene at the Victoria. The upstairs rooms are like fanlights over street-doors. The nurseries—but no, no, no, no more! . . ."
The date of his letter was November 22nd, and it had three postscripts.[130] The first, "Monday afternoon," informed me that a house had been taken; that, unless the agreement fell apart due to some unexpected conflict between Roche and the agent ("a French Mrs. Gamp"), I was to contact him at No. 48, Rue de Courcelles, Faubourg St. Honoré; and that he would then describe the place as, in his opinion, the "most ridiculous, extraordinary, unparalleled, and preposterous" in the whole world; being something like a playhouse, a "shades," a haunted castle, and a crazy kind of clock. "They belong to a Marquis Castellan, and you'll be ready to die laughing when you see them." The second P.S. stated that he wouldn't say a word until I saw it for myself. "By Heaven, you can't imagine it!" The third P.S. wrapped up the letter. "One room is a tent. Another room is a grove. Another room is a scene from the Victoria. The upstairs rooms are like fanlights over street doors. The nurseries—but no, no, no, no more! . . ."
His following letter nevertheless sent more, even in the form of an additional protestation that never till I saw it should the place be described. "I will merely observe that it is fifty yards long, and eighteen feet high, and that the bedrooms are exactly like opera-boxes. It has its little courtyard and garden, and porter's house, and cordon to open the door, and so forth; and is a Paris mansion in little. There is a gleam of reason in the drawing-room. Being a gentleman's house, and not one furnished to let, it has some very curious things in it; some of the oddest things you ever beheld in your life; and an infinity of easy chairs and sofas. . . . Bad weather. It is snowing hard. There is not a door or window here—but that's nothing! there's not a door or window in all[319] Paris—that shuts; not a chink in all the billions of trillions of chinks in the city that can he stopped to keep the wind out. And the cold!—but you shall judge for yourself; and also of this preposterous dining-room. The invention, sir, of Henry Bulwer, who when he had executed it (he used to live here), got frightened at what he had done, as well he might, and went away. . . . The Brave called me aside on Saturday night, and showed me an improvement he had effected in the decorative way. 'Which,' he said, 'will very much s'prize Mis'r Fors'er when he come.' You are to be deluded into the belief that there is a perspective of chambers twenty miles in length, opening from the drawing-room. . . ."
His next letter, however, conveyed even more, including an extra insistence that the place should never be described until I saw it. "I'll just mention that it’s fifty yards long and eighteen feet high, and the bedrooms are exactly like opera boxes. It has a small courtyard and garden, a porter’s house, and a bell to open the door, and so on; it's like a miniature Paris mansion. There’s a hint of reason in the drawing room. Since it's a gentleman's house, not a rental, it has some very unusual items in it—some of the strangest things you’d ever see—and an abundance of comfy chairs and sofas. . . . The weather is terrible. It’s snowing heavily. There isn’t a door or window here—but that’s no big deal! There isn’t a door or a window anywhere in[319] Paris that actually shuts; it doesn't matter how many billions of cracks exist in this city, none can be sealed to keep the wind out. And the cold!—but you’ll judge for yourself too, and also about this ridiculous dining room. It was designed by Henry Bulwer, who, after he finished it (he used to live here), got scared of what he had created and left. . . . The Brave pulled me aside on Saturday night and showed me a decorative improvement he had made. 'This,' he said, 'will really surprise Mr. Fors'er when he comes.' You’re meant to be tricked into thinking there’s a perspective of rooms stretching twenty miles from the drawing room. . . ."
My visit was not yet due, however, and what occupied or interested him in the interval may first be told. He had not been two days in Paris when a letter from his father made him very anxious for the health of his eldest sister. "I was going to the play (a melodrama in eight acts, five hours long), but hadn't the heart to leave home after my father's letter," he is writing on the 30th of November, "and sent Georgy and Kate by themselves. There seems to be no doubt whatever that Fanny is in a consumption." She had broken down in an attempt to sing at a party in Manchester; and subsequent examination by Sir Charles Bell's son, who was present and took much interest in her, too sadly revealed the cause. "He advised that neither she nor Burnett should be told the truth, and my father has not disclosed it. In worldly circumstances they are very comfortable, and they are very much respected. They seem to be happy together, and Burnett has a great[320] deal of teaching. You remember my fears about her when she was in London the time of Alfred's marriage, and that I said she looked to me as if she were in a decline? Kate took her to Elliotson, who said that her lungs were certainly not affected then. And she cried for joy. Don't you think it would be better for her to be brought up, if possible, to see Elliotson again? I am deeply, deeply grieved about it." This course was taken, and for a time there seemed room for hope; but the result will be seen. In the same letter I heard of poor Charles Sheridan, well known to us both, dying of the same terrible disease; and his chief, Lord Normanby, whose many acts of sympathy and kindness had inspired strong regard in Dickens, he had already found "as informal and good-natured as ever, but not so gay as usual, and having an anxious, haggard way with him, as if his responsibilities were more than he had bargained for." Nor, to account for this, had Dickens far to seek, when a little leisure enabled him to see something of what was passing in Paris in that last year of Louis Philippe's reign. What first impressed him most unfavourably was a glimpse in the Champs Elysées, of the King himself coming in from the country. "There were two carriages. His was surrounded by horseguards. It went at a great pace, and he sat very far back in a corner of it, I promise you. It was strange to an Englishman to see the Prefet of Police riding on horseback some hundreds of yards in advance of the cortége, turning his head incessantly from side to side, like a figure in a Dutch clock, and scrutinizing everybody and everything, as if he suspected all the twigs in all the trees in the long avenue."[321]
My visit wasn't due yet, but what caught his attention during that time can be shared first. He hadn't been in Paris for two days when a letter from his father made him really worried about the health of his oldest sister. "I was planning to go to the theater (a melodrama in eight acts, five hours long), but I couldn't bear to leave home after my father's letter," he wrote on November 30th, "so I sent Georgy and Kate by themselves. It seems there’s no doubt that Fanny is dealing with tuberculosis." She had faltered while trying to sing at a party in Manchester, and an examination by Sir Charles Bell's son, who was there and took a great interest in her, sadly confirmed it. "He recommended that neither she nor Burnett should be told the truth, and my father hasn't revealed it. They are quite comfortable financially and are very respected. They seem happy together, and Burnett has a lot of teaching to do. You remember how worried I was about her when she was in London during Alfred's wedding, and I mentioned that she looked like she was in decline? Kate took her to see Elliotson, who said that her lungs were definitely not affected then. And she cried tears of joy. Don’t you think it would be better for her to be brought back, if possible, to see Elliotson again? I’m profoundly saddened by this." This plan was followed, and for a while, there seemed to be hope; but the outcome will be revealed. In the same letter, I learned about poor Charles Sheridan, well known to both of us, dying from the same terrible illness; and his boss, Lord Normanby, whose many acts of sympathy and kindness had inspired Dickens's strong regard, he found "as laid-back and good-natured as ever, but not as cheerful as usual, having an anxious, worn look, as if his responsibilities were more than he could handle." Dickens didn’t have to look far to understand why, as a little free time allowed him to observe what was occurring in Paris during that final year of Louis Philippe's reign. What first struck him most negatively was a glimpse of the King himself returning from the countryside in the Champs Elysées. "There were two carriages. His was surrounded by horse guards. It moved at a rapid pace, and he sat very far back in a corner of it, I assure you. It was odd for an Englishman to see the Prefet of Police riding horseback several hundred yards ahead of the convoy, constantly turning his head from side to side, like a figure in a Dutch clock, scrutinizing everyone and everything, as if he suspected every branch in all the trees along the long avenue."
But these and other political indications were only, as they generally prove to be, the outward signs of maladies more deeply-seated. He saw almost everywhere signs of canker eating into the heart of the people themselves. "It is a wicked and detestable place, though wonderfully attractive; and there can be no better summary of it, after all, than Hogarth's unmentionable phrase." He sent me no letter that did not contribute something of observation or character. He went at first rather frequently to the Morgue, until shocked by something so repulsive that he had not courage for a long time to go back; and on that same occasion he had noticed the keeper smoking a short pipe at his little window, "and giving a bit of fresh turf to a linnet in a cage." Of the condition generally of the streets he reported badly; the quays on the other side of the Seine were not safe after dark; and here was his own night experience of one of the best quarters of the city. "I took Georgy out, the night before last, to show her the Palais Royal lighted up; and on the Boulevard, a street as bright as the brightest part of the Strand or Regent-street, we saw a man fall upon another, close before us, and try to tear the cloak off his back. It was in a little dark corner near the Porte St. Denis, which stands out in the middle of the street. After a short struggle, the thief fled (there were thousands of people walking about), and was captured just on the other side of the road."
But these and other political signs were only, as they usually are, the visible symptoms of deeper issues. He noticed almost everywhere indications of a rot eating away at the heart of the people themselves. "It's a wicked and disgusting place, although strangely appealing; and there’s no better way to sum it up than Hogarth's unmentionable phrase." He sent me no letter that didn’t include some observation or character insight. He initially visited the Morgue fairly often, until he was so disturbed by something repulsive that he didn't have the courage to go back for a long time; and on that occasion, he noticed the keeper smoking a short pipe at his little window, "and giving a bit of fresh turf to a linnet in a cage." He reported that the overall condition of the streets was bad; the quays on the other side of the Seine weren’t safe after dark; and here’s his own night experience in one of the best neighborhoods of the city. "I took Georgy out the night before last to show her the Palais Royal lit up; and on the Boulevard, a street as bright as the brightest part of the Strand or Regent Street, we saw a man attack another right in front of us, trying to rip the cloak off his back. It was in a small dark corner near the Porte St. Denis, which juts out in the middle of the street. After a brief struggle, the thief ran away (there were thousands of people walking by), and was caught just on the other side of the road."
An incident of that kind might mean little or much: but what he proceeded to remark of the ordinary Parisian workpeople and smaller shopkeepers, had a more grave complexion; and may be thought perhaps still to yield[322] some illustration, not without value, to the story of the quarter of a century that has passed since, and even to some of the appalling events of its latest year or two. "It is extraordinary what nonsense English people talk, write, and believe, about foreign countries. The Swiss (so much decried) will do anything for you, if you are frank and civil; they are attentive and punctual in all their dealings; and may be relied upon as steadily as the English. The Parisian workpeople and smaller shopkeepers are more like (and unlike) Americans than I could have supposed possible. To the American indifference and carelessness, they add a procrastination and want of the least heed about keeping a promise or being exact, which is certainly not surpassed in Naples. They have the American semi-sentimental independence too, and none of the American vigour or purpose. If they ever get free trade in France (as I suppose they will, one day), these parts of the population must, for years and years, be ruined. They couldn't get the means of existence, in competition with the English workmen. Their inferior manual dexterity, their lazy habits, perfect unreliability, and habitual insubordination, would ruin them in any such contest, instantly. They are fit for nothing but soldiering—and so far, I believe, the successors in the policy of your friend Napoleon have reason on their side. Eh bien, mon ami, quand vous venez à Paris, nous nous mettrons à quatre épingles, et nous verrons toutes les merveilles de la cité, et vous en jugerez. God bless me, I beg your pardon! It comes so natural."
An incident like that might seem insignificant or significant: but what he went on to say about the typical Parisian workers and smaller shopkeepers had a more serious tone; and it may still offer[322] some valuable insight into the story of the past twenty-five years, and even some of the shocking events of the last year or two. "It's amazing the nonsense that English people talk, write, and believe about other countries. The Swiss (who get so much criticism) will do anything for you if you’re honest and polite; they are attentive and punctual in all their dealings; and can be relied upon just like the English. The Parisian workers and smaller shopkeepers are more similar (and different) from Americans than I ever thought possible. Along with American indifference and carelessness, they add a tendency to procrastinate and a total disregard for keeping promises or being precise, which is certainly matched in Naples. They also share that American semi-sentimental independence, but lack the American energy or purpose. If they ever achieve free trade in France (as I assume they will someday), these groups of people will be devastated for years. They wouldn’t be able to make a living competing with English workers. Their poorer manual skills, lazy habits, complete unreliability, and habitual insubordination would lead to their downfall in such a competition, immediately. They are suited for nothing but soldiering—and based on that, I believe the successors of your friend Napoleon have a point. Well, my friend, when you come to Paris, we’ll dress to the nines, see all the wonders of the city, and you can judge for yourself. Goodness, I’m so sorry! It just comes so naturally."
On the 30th he wrote to me that he had got his papers into order and hoped to begin that day. But[323] the same letter told me of the unsettlement thus early of his half-formed Paris plans. Three months sooner than he designed he should be due in London for family reasons; should have to keep within the limit of four months abroad; and as his own house would not be free till July, would have to hire one from the end of March. "In these circumstances I think I shall send Charley to King's-college after Christmas. I am sorry he should lose so much French, but don't you think to break another half-year's schooling would be a pity? Of my own will I would not send him to King's-college at all, but to Bruce-castle instead. I suppose, however, Miss Coutts is best. We will talk over all this when I come to London." The offer to take charge of his eldest son's education had been pressed upon Dickens by this true friend, to whose delicate and noble consideration for him it would hardly become me to make other allusion here. Munificent as the kindness was, however, it was yet only the smallest part of the obligation which Dickens felt that he owed this lady; to whose generous schemes for the neglected and uncared-for classes of the population, in all which he deeply sympathised, he did the very utmost to render, through many years, unstinted service of his time and his labour, with sacrifice unselfish as her own. His proposed early visit to London, named in this letter, was to see the rehearsal of his Christmas story, dramatised by Mr. Albert Smith for Mr. and Mrs. Keeley at the Lyceum; and my own proposed visit to Paris was to be in the middle of January. "It will then be the height of the season, and a good time for testing the unaccountable French vanity which really does suppose[324] there are no fogs here, but that they are all in London."[131]
On the 30th, he wrote to me that he had gotten his papers in order and hoped to start that day. But[323] the same letter informed me of the early disruption to his half-planned Paris trip. He would have to be in London three months earlier than intended for family reasons, keep his stay abroad to four months, and since his own house wouldn’t be available until July, he would need to rent one from the end of March. "Given these circumstances, I think I’ll send Charley to King’s College after Christmas. I regret that he will lose so much French, but don’t you think it would be a shame to interrupt another half-year of schooling? If it were up to me, I wouldn’t send him to King’s College at all but to Bruce Castle instead. Nonetheless, I suppose Miss Coutts is the better option. We can discuss all this when I come to London." The offer to oversee his eldest son’s education had been strongly suggested to Dickens by this true friend, whose thoughtful and generous consideration for him I hardly dare reference here. Although her kindness was extravagant, it was just a small part of the gratitude Dickens felt he owed this lady; he wholeheartedly supported her ambitious plans for the neglected and abandoned segments of the population, dedicating many years to selflessly contribute his time and effort. His planned early visit to London, mentioned in this letter, was to attend the rehearsal of his Christmas story, adapted by Mr. Albert Smith for Mr. and Mrs. Keeley at the Lyceum; and my intended visit to Paris was set for mid-January. "It will be the peak of the season then, a great time to test the peculiar French vanity that genuinely believes[324] there are no fogs here, but that they all exist in London."[131]
The opening of his next letter, which bore date the 6th of December, and its amusing sequel, will sufficiently speak for themselves. "Cold intense. The water in the bedroom-jugs freezes into solid masses from top to bottom, bursts the jugs with reports like small cannon, and rolls out on the tables and wash-stands, hard as granite. I stick to the shower-bath, but have been most hopelessly out of sorts—writing sorts; that's all. Couldn't begin, in the strange place; took a violent dislike to my study, and came down into the drawing-room; couldn't find a corner that would answer my purpose; fell into a black contemplation of the waning month; sat six hours at a stretch, and wrote as many lines, &c. &c. &c. . . . Then, you know what arrangements are necessary with the chairs and tables; and then what correspondence had to be cleared off; and then how I tried to settle to my desk, and went about and about it, and dodged at it, like a bird at a lump of sugar. In short I have just begun; five printed pages finished, I should say; and hope I shall be blessed with a better condition this next week,[325] or I shall be behind-hand. I shall try to go at it—hard. I can't do more. . . . There is rather a good man lives in this street, and I have had a correspondence with him which is preserved for your inspection. His name is Barthélemy. He wears a prodigious Spanish cloak, a slouched hat, an immense beard, and long black hair. He called the other day and left his card. Allow me to enclose his card, which has originality and merit.
The opening of his next letter, dated December 6th, and its entertaining follow-up, will clearly speak for themselves. "It’s freezing cold. The water in the bedroom jugs turns into solid ice, breaking the jugs with loud pops like small cannons, and spills out onto the tables and washstands, rock hard. I stick to the shower, but I’ve been feeling completely out of sorts—writer’s block, that’s all. I couldn’t get started in the unfamiliar place; I really disliked my study, so I moved to the drawing-room; I couldn’t find a spot that worked; I ended up in a deep funk thinking about the dwindling month; I sat for six hours straight and only managed to write a few lines, etc. etc. etc. Then, you know how it is with moving chairs and tables; and then there was all the correspondence I needed to catch up on; and then I tried to settle at my desk, circling around it and hesitating like a bird at a piece of sugar. In short, I’ve just started; I’ve finished about five printed pages, I’d say; and I hope I’ll feel better this coming week,[325] or I’ll fall behind. I’ll try to dive into it—hard. I can’t do more. There’s a pretty decent guy living on this street, and I’ve had some correspondence with him that I’m saving for your review. His name is Barthélemy. He wears an enormous Spanish cloak, a slouched hat, a huge beard, and long black hair. He stopped by the other day and left his card. I’ll enclose his card, which is quite original and impressive.

He was in London eight days, from the 15th to the 23rd of December;[132] and among the occupations of his visit, besides launching his little story on the stage, was the settlement of form for a cheap edition of his writings, which began in the following year. It was to be printed in double-columns, and issued weekly in three-halfpenny numbers; there were to be new prefaces, but no illustrations; and for each book something less than a fourth of the original price was to be charged. Its success was very good, but did not come even near to the mark of the later issues of his writings. His own feeling as to this, however, though any failure at the moment affected him on other grounds, was always that of a quiet confidence; and he had expressed this in a proposed dedication of this very edition, which for other reasons was ultimately laid aside. It will be worth preserving here. "This cheap edition of my books is dedicated to the English people, in whose approval, if the books be true in spirit, they will live, and out of whose memory, if they be false, they will very soon die."
He was in London for eight days, from December 15th to the 23rd;[132] and among the things he did during his visit, besides launching his little story on stage, was to set up a low-cost edition of his writings, which began the following year. It was to be printed in double columns and released weekly in three-penny issues; there would be new prefaces but no illustrations, and each book would cost just under a quarter of the original price. Its success was pretty good, but it didn't come close to the later editions of his works. Regardless, his feelings about it—despite any momentary setbacks bothering him for other reasons—were always one of quiet confidence. He even put this into a proposed dedication for the edition, which was eventually set aside for different reasons, but it's worth keeping here: "This budget edition of my books is dedicated to the English people, whose approval will ensure their longevity if the books are true in spirit, and whose memory will cause them to fade quickly if they are not."
Upon his return to Paris I had frequent report of his progress with his famous fifth number, on the completion of which I was to join him. The day at one time[327] seemed doubtful. "It would be miserable to have to work while you were here. Still, I make such sudden starts, and am so possessed of what I am going to do, that the fear may prove to be quite groundless, and if any alteration would trouble you, let the 13th stand at all hazards." The cold he described as so intense, and the price of fuel so enormous, that though the house was not half warmed ("as you'll say, when you feel it") it cost him very near a pound a day. Begging-letter writers had found out "Monsieur Dickens, le romancier célèbre," and waylaid him at the door and in the street as numerously as in London: their distinguishing peculiarity being that they were nearly all of them "Chevaliers de la Garde Impériale de sa Majesté Napoléon le Grand," and that their letters bore immense seals with coats of arms as large as five-shilling pieces. His friends the Watsons passed new year's day with him on their way to Rockingham from Lausanne, leaving that country covered with snow and the Bise blowing cruelly over it, but describing it as nothing to the cold of Paris. On the day that closed the old year he had gone into the Morgue and seen an old man with grey head lying there. "It seemed the strangest thing in the world that it should have been necessary to take any trouble to stop such a feeble, spent, exhausted morsel of life. It was just dusk when I went in; the place was empty; and he lay there, all alone, like an impersonation of the wintry eighteen hundred and forty-six. . . . I find I am getting inimitable, so I'll stop."
When he returned to Paris, I received regular updates on his progress with his famous fifth issue, the one I was supposed to join him on once it was completed. At one point, the timing seemed uncertain. "It would be awful to have to work while you were here. Still, I can be so spontaneous, and I get so caught up in what I’m going to do that my worries may be completely unfounded. If any changes would bother you, let’s stick to the 13th no matter what." He described the cold as extremely harsh, and the cost of heating so high that even though the house was barely warm ("as you'll say when you feel it"), it was costing him nearly a pound a day. Panhandlers had discovered "Monsieur Dickens, the famous novelist," and were stopping him at the door and in the street just as often as in London. Their unique feature was that nearly all of them were "Knights of the Imperial Guard of His Majesty Napoleon the Great," and their letters had huge seals with coats of arms the size of five-shilling coins. His friends the Watsons spent New Year’s Day with him on their way to Rockingham from Lausanne, leaving a snowy landscape behind and the Bise wind cutting through it, but they said it was nothing compared to the cold in Paris. On the last day of the old year, he had gone into the Morgue and seen an old man with gray hair lying there. "It seemed the strangest thing in the world that any effort was necessary to remove such a frail, worn-out scrap of life. It was just getting dark when I went in; the place was empty; and he lay there, all alone, like a symbol of the cold of eighteen hundred and forty-six... I realize I’m becoming unique, so I’ll stop."
The time for my visit having come, I had grateful proof of the minute and thoughtful provision characteristic[328] of him in everything. My dinner had been ordered to the second at Boulogne, my place in the malle-poste taken, and these and other services announced in a letter, which, by way of doing its part also in the kindly work of preparation, broke out into French. He never spoke that language very well, his accent being somehow defective; but he practised himself into writing it with remarkable ease and fluency. "I have written to the Hôtel des Bains at Boulogne to send on to Calais and take your place in the malle-poste. . . . Of course you know that you'll be assailed with frightful shouts all along the two lines of ropes from all the touters in Boulogne, and of course you'll pass on like the princess who went up the mountain after the talking bird; but don't forget quietly to single out the Hôtel des Bains commissionnaire. The following circumstances will then occur. My experience is more recent than yours, and I will throw them into a dramatic form. . . . You are filtered into the little office, where there are some soldiers; and a gentleman with a black beard and a pen and ink sitting behind a counter. Barbe Noire (to the lord of L. I. F.). Monsieur, votre passeport. Monsieur. Monsieur, le voici! Barbe Noire. Où allez-vous, monsieur? Monsieur. Monsieur, je vais à Paris. Barbe Noire. Quand allez-vous partir, monsieur? Monsieur. Monsieur, je vais partir aujourd'hui. Avec la malle-poste. Barbe Noire. C'est bien. (To Gendarme.) Laissez sortir monsieur! Gendarme. Par ici, monsieur, s'il vous plait. Le gendarme ouvert une très petite porte. Monsieur se trouve subitement entouré de tous les gamins, agents, commissionnaires, porteurs, et polissons, en général, de Boulogne, qui[329] s'élancent sur lui, en poussant des cris épouvantables. Monsieur est, pour le moment, tout-à-fait effrayé et bouleversé. Mais monsieur reprend ses forces et dit, de haute voix: 'Le Commissionnaire de l'Hôtel des Bains!' Un petit homme (s'avançant rapidement, et en souriant doucement). Me voici, monsieur. Monsieur Fors Tair, n'est-ce pas? . . . Alors. . . . Alors monsieur se promène à l'Hôtel des Bains, où monsieur trouvera qu'un petit salon particulier, en haut, est déjà préparé pour sa réception, et que son dîner est déjà commandé, aux soins du brave Courier, à midi et demi. . . . Monsieur mangera son dîner près du feu, avec beaucoup de plaisir, et il boirera de vin rouge à la santé de Monsieur de Boze, et sa famille intéressante et aimable. La malle-poste arrivera au bureau de la poste aux lettres à deux heures ou peut-être un peu plus tard. Mais monsieur chargera le commissionnaire d'y l'accompagner de bonne heure, car c'est beaucoup mieux de l'attendre que de la perdre. La malle-poste arrivé, monsieur s'assiéra, aussi confortablement qu'il le peut, et il y restera jusqu'à son arrivé au bureau de la poste aux lettres à Paris. Parceque, le convoi (train) n'est pas l'affaire de monsieur, qui continuera s'asseoir dans la malle-poste, sur le chemin de fer, et après le chemin de fer, jusqu'il se trouve à la basse-cour du bureau de la poste aux lettres à Paris, où il trouvera une voiture qui a été dépêché de la Rue de Courcelles, quarante-huit. Mais monsieur aura la bonté d'observer—Si le convoi arriverait à Amiens après le départ du convoi à minuit, il faudra y rester jusqu'à l'arrivé d'un autre convoi à trois heures moins un quart. En attendant, monsieur peut rester au buffet (refreshment room), où l'on peut toujours[330] trouver un bon feu, et du café chaud, et des très bonnes choses à boire et à manger, pendant toute la nuit.—Est-ce que monsieur comprend parfaitement toutes ces règles pour sa guidance?—Vive le Roi des Français! Roi de la nation la plus grande, et la plus noble, et la plus extraordinairement merveilleuse, du monde! A bas des Anglais!
The time for my visit had arrived, and I was grateful for the detailed and considerate arrangements that were typical of him in everything. My dinner had been scheduled to the minute at Boulogne, my spot on the malle-poste secured, and these and other services were mentioned in a letter that, in its own way of contributing to the friendly preparations, burst out in French. He never spoke the language very well, his accent being somewhat off; but he practiced writing it with remarkable ease and fluency. "I've written to the Hôtel des Bains in Boulogne to send your details to Calais and hold your spot in the malle-poste. ... Of course, you know you'll be bombarded with horrible shouts from all the touts in Boulogne along the two lines of ropes, and of course, you'll glide through like the princess who climbed the mountain to find the talking bird; but don’t forget to quietly look for the Hôtel des Bains commissionnaire. The following events will then unfold. My experience is more recent than yours, so I'll present it dramatically. ... You will be filtered into the little office, where there are some soldiers; and a man with a black beard and a pen and ink sitting behind a counter. Barbe Noire (to the lord of L. I. F.). Sir, your passport. Sir. Sir, here it is! Barbe Noire. Where are you going, sir? Sir. Sir, I’m going to Paris. Barbe Noire. When are you leaving, sir? Sir. Sir, I'm leaving today. By the malle-poste. Barbe Noire. That's good. (To Gendarme.) Let him out! Gendarme. This way, sir, please. The gendarme opens a very small door. Suddenly, the gentleman is surrounded by all the kids, agents, commissionnaires, porters, and general troublemakers of Boulogne, who rush at him, making terrible noises. The gentleman is, for the moment, completely frightened and overwhelmed. But he regains his composure and says loudly, 'The commissionnaire from the Hôtel des Bains!' A little man (hurrying forward with a gentle smile). Here I am, sir. Mr. Fors Tair, right? ... So ... Mr. will stroll to the Hôtel des Bains, where he will find that a small private room upstairs is already prepared for him, and his dinner has already been ordered, thanks to the brave Courier, at twelve-thirty. ... Mr. will enjoy his dinner by the fire, and he will drink red wine to the health of Mr. de Boze and his lovely, lovely family. The malle-poste will arrive at the letter post office at two o'clock or maybe a little later. But Mr. will ask the commissionnaire to accompany him there early, because it's much better to wait for it than to miss it. Once the malle-poste arrives, Mr. will sit as comfortably as he can and remain there until he reaches the letter post office in Paris. Because the train is not Mr.'s concern, who will continue to sit in the malle-poste until he finds himself at the yard of the letter post office in Paris, where he will find a carriage that has been dispatched from 48 Rue de Courcelles. But Mr. kindly needs to note—If the train arrives in Amiens after the midnight departure, he must stay there until the arrival of another train at a quarter to three. In the meantime, Mr. can relax in the buffet (refreshment room), where he can always find a good fire, hot coffee, and very nice things to eat and drink, all night long.—Does Mr. understand all these rules perfectly for his guidance?—Long live the King of the French! King of the greatest, most noble, and extraordinarily wonderful nation in the world! Down with the English!
"Français naturalisé, et Citoyen de Paris."
We passed a fortnight together, and crowded into it more than might seem possible to such a narrow space. With a dreadful insatiability we passed through every variety of sight-seeing, prisons, palaces, theatres, hospitals, the Morgue and the Lazare, as well as the Louvre, Versailles, St. Cloud, and all the spots made memorable by the first revolution. The excellent comedian Regnier, known to us through Macready and endeared by many kindnesses, incomparable for his knowledge of the city and unwearying in friendly service, made us free of the green-room of the Français, where, on the birthday of Molière, we saw his "Don Juan" revived. At the Conservatoire we witnessed the masterly teaching of Samson; at the Odéon saw a new play by Ponsard, done but indifferently; at the Variétés "Gentil-Bernard," with four grisettes as if stepped out of a picture by Watteau; at the Gymnase "Clarisse Harlowe," with a death-scene of Rose Cheri which comes back to me, through the distance of time, as the prettiest piece of pure and gentle stage-pathos in my memory; at the Porte St. Martin "Lucretia Borgia" by Hugo; at the Cirque, scenes of the great[331] revolution, and all the battles of Napoleon; at the Comic Opera, "Gibby"; and at the Palais Royal the usual new-year's piece, in which Alexandre Dumas was shown in his study beside a pile of quarto volumes five feet high, which proved to be the first tableau of the first act of the first piece to be played on the first night of his new theatre. That new theatre, the Historique, we also saw verging to a very short-lived completeness; and we supped with Dumas himself, and Eugène Sue, and met Théophile Gautier and Alphonse Karr. We saw Lamartine also, and had much friendly intercourse with Scribe, and with the kind good-natured Amedée Pichot. One day we visited in the Rue du Bac the sick and ailing Chateaubriand, whom we thought like Basil Montagu; found ourselves at the other extreme of opinion in the sculpture-room of David d'Angers; and closed that day at the house of Victor Hugo, by whom Dickens was received with infinite courtesy and grace. The great writer then occupied a floor in a noble corner-house in the Place Royale, the old quarter of Ninon l'Enclos and the people of the Regency, of whom the gorgeous tapestries, the painted ceilings, the wonderful carvings and old golden furniture, including a canopy of state out of some palace of the middle age, quaintly and grandly reminded us. He was himself, however, the best thing we saw; and I find it difficult to associate the attitudes and aspect in which the world has lately wondered at him, with the sober grace and self-possessed quiet gravity of that night of twenty-five years ago. Just then Louis Philippe had ennobled him, but the man's nature was written noble. Rather under the middle size, of compact close-buttoned-up figure,[332] with ample dark hair falling loosely over his close-shaven face, I never saw upon any features so keenly intellectual such a soft and sweet gentility, and certainly never heard the French language spoken with the picturesque distinctness given to it by Victor Hugo. He talked of his childhood in Spain, and of his father having been Governor of the Tagus in Napoleon's wars; spoke warmly of the English people and their literature; declared his preference for melody and simplicity over the music then fashionable at the Conservatoire; referred kindly to Ponsard, laughed at the actors who had murdered his tragedy at the Odéon, and sympathized with the dramatic venture of Dumas. To Dickens he addressed very charming flattery, in the best taste; and my friend long remembered the enjoyment of that evening.
We spent two weeks together, cramming more into that time than you'd think possible in such a small space. With relentless eagerness, we explored every kind of attraction: prisons, palaces, theaters, hospitals, the Morgue and the Lazare, along with the Louvre, Versailles, St. Cloud, and all the places made famous by the first revolution. The wonderful comedian Regnier, who we knew from Macready and who was dear to us for his kindness, was unmatched in his knowledge of the city and tireless in his friendly assistance. He made us feel at home in the green room of the Français, where we saw a revival of Molière's "Don Juan" on Molière's birthday. At the Conservatoire, we observed the masterful teaching of Samson; at the Odéon, we saw a new play by Ponsard that was only so-so; at the Variétés, "Gentil-Bernard" featured four grisettes who seemed to have stepped out of a Watteau painting; at the Gymnase, "Clarisse Harlowe" included a death scene by Rose Cheri that I still remember as one of the most beautiful and gentle pieces of stage pathos; at the Porte St. Martin, we saw Hugo’s "Lucretia Borgia"; at the Cirque, scenes from the great revolution and all Napoleon's battles; at the Comic Opera, "Gibby"; and at the Palais Royal, the typical New Year's piece, where Alexandre Dumas was depicted in his study next to a towering stack of quarto volumes, which turned out to be the first tableau of the first act of the opening night of his new theater. We also witnessed the near-completion of the new theater, the Historique; had dinner with Dumas himself and Eugène Sue, and met Théophile Gautier and Alphonse Karr. We visited the ailing Chateaubriand on Rue du Bac, who reminded us of Basil Montagu; found ourselves in stark disagreement in the sculpture room of David d'Angers; and ended that day at Victor Hugo's house, where Dickens was greeted with incredible courtesy and grace. The great writer then lived on a floor in an elegant corner building in the Place Royale, the historic quarter of Ninon l'Enclos and the Regency people, of whom the lavish tapestries, painted ceilings, magnificent carvings, and old gold furniture—including a state canopy from a medieval palace—quirkily and grandly reminded us. But actually, he was the best thing we saw; and I find it hard to connect the way the world has recently marveled at him with the dignified grace and composed seriousness of that night twenty-five years ago. At that time, Louis Philippe had made him a nobleman, but his nature was already noble. A bit shorter than average, with a compact, neatly-dressed figure and ample dark hair falling loosely over his closely-shaven face, I had never seen features that were so intellectually sharp yet carried such a gentle charm, and I certainly never heard French spoken with the vivid clarity that Victor Hugo provided. He talked about his childhood in Spain, about his father being Governor of the Tagus during Napoleon's wars; he spoke warmly about the English people and their literature; he expressed his preference for melody and simplicity over the music that was popular at the Conservatoire; he kindly referred to Ponsard, laughed at the actors who had butchered his tragedy at the Odéon, and sympathized with Dumas’s dramatic efforts. To Dickens, he offered delightful flattery of the finest kind; and my friend remembered the joy of that evening for a long time.
There is little to add of our Paris holiday, if indeed too much has not been said already. We had an adventure with a drunken coachman, of which the sequel showed at least the vigour and decisiveness of the police in regard to hired vehicles[133] in those last days of the[333] Orleans monarchy. At the Bibliothèque Royale we were much interested by seeing, among many other priceless treasures, Gutenberg's types, Racine's notes in his copy of Sophocles, Rousseau's music, and Voltaire's note upon Frederick of Prussia's letter. Nor should I omit that in what Dickens then told me, of even his small experience of the social aspects of Paris, there seemed but the same disease which raged afterwards through the second Empire. Not many days after I left, all Paris was crowding to the sale of a lady of the demi-monde, Marie du Plessis, who had led the most brilliant and abandoned of lives, and left behind her the most exquisite furniture and the most voluptuous and sumptuous bijouterie. Dickens wished at one time to have pointed the moral of this life and death of which there was great talk in Paris while we were together. The disease of satiety, which only less often than hunger passes for a broken heart, had killed her. "What do you want?" asked the most famous of the Paris physicians, at a loss for her exact complaint. At last she answered: "To see my mother." She was[334] sent for; and there came a simple Breton peasant-woman clad in the quaint garb of her province, who prayed by her bed until she died. Wonderful was the admiration and sympathy; and it culminated when Eugène Sue bought her prayer-book at the sale. Our last talk before I quitted Paris, after dinner at the Embassy, was of the danger underlying all this, and of the signs also visible everywhere of the Napoleon-worship which the Orleanists themselves had most favoured. Accident brought Dickens to England a fortnight later, when again we met together, at Gore-house, the self-contained reticent man whose doubtful inheritance was thus rapidly preparing to fall to him.[134]
There’s not much more to say about our trip to Paris, if too much hasn’t already been said. We had an experience with a drunken cab driver, and the aftermath showed how effective the police were with hired vehicles during those last days of the Orleans monarchy. At the Bibliothèque Royale, we were fascinated to see, among many other priceless treasures, Gutenberg's types, Racine's notes in his copy of Sophocles, Rousseau's music, and Voltaire's note on Frederick of Prussia's letter. I should also mention that what Dickens shared with me about his limited experiences of social life in Paris revealed the same issues that would later emerge during the Second Empire. Not long after I left, all of Paris flocked to the sale of a woman from the demi-monde, Marie du Plessis, who had lived a glamorous but reckless life, leaving behind exquisite furniture and lavish jewelry. Dickens once expressed a desire to highlight the moral of this life and death, which generated significant discussion in Paris while we were there. The problem of feeling unfulfilled, often mistaken for a broken heart, had led to her demise. "What’s wrong?" asked the most famous doctor in Paris, unsure of her exact ailment. Eventually, she replied, "I want to see my mother." A simple Breton peasant woman, dressed in her traditional attire, was summoned, and she prayed by her side until she passed away. The admiration and sympathy were remarkable, reaching a peak when Eugène Sue purchased her prayer book at the sale. Our last conversation before I left Paris, after dinner at the Embassy, revolved around the underlying dangers of all this and the signs of the Napoleon worship that the Orleanists themselves had promoted. By chance, Dickens ended up in England two weeks later, and we met again at Gore-house with the reserved, introspective man whose uncertain inheritance was quickly about to come to him.
The accident was the having underwritten his number of Dombey by two pages, which there was not time to[335] supply otherwise than by coming to London to write them.[135] This was done accordingly; but another greater trouble followed. He had hardly returned to Paris when his eldest son, whom I had brought to England with me and placed in the house of Doctor Major, then head-master of King's-college-school, was attacked by scarlet fever; and this closed prematurely Dickens's residence in Paris. But though he and his wife at once came over, and were followed after some days by the children and their aunt, the isolation of the little invalid could not so soon be broken through. His father at last saw him, nearly a month before the rest, in a lodging in Albany-street, where his grandmother, Mrs. Hogarth, had devoted herself to the charge of him; and an incident of the visit, which amused us all very much, will not unfitly introduce the subject that waits me in my next chapter.
The accident was due to him having underwritten his number of Dombey by two pages, and there wasn’t enough time to[335] supply them any other way than by coming to London to write them.[135] This was done, but then a bigger problem arose. He had barely returned to Paris when his eldest son, whom I had brought to England with me and placed in the house of Doctor Major, then head-master of King's-college-school, was struck down by scarlet fever; and this cut Dickens's stay in Paris short. Even though he and his wife rushed over, and the children and their aunt followed days later, they couldn’t break through the isolation of the little patient right away. His father finally got to see him, nearly a month before the others, in a lodging on Albany Street, where his grandmother, Mrs. Hogarth, had dedicated herself to taking care of him. One incident during the visit, which made us all laugh, will nicely lead into the topic I’ll cover in my next chapter.
An elderly charwoman employed about the place had shown so much sympathy in the family trouble, that Mrs. Hogarth specially told her of the approaching visit, and who it was that was coming to the sick-room. "Lawk ma'am!" she said. "Is the young gentleman upstairs the son of the man that put together Dombey?" Reassured upon this point, she explained[336] her question by declaring that she never thought there was a man that could have put together Dombey. Being pressed farther as to what her notion was of this mystery of a Dombey (for it was known she could not read), it turned out that she lodged at a snuff-shop kept by a person named Douglas, where there were several other lodgers; and that on the first Monday of every month there was a Tea, and the landlord read the month's number of Dombey, those only of the lodgers who subscribed to the tea partaking of that luxury, but all having the benefit of the reading; and the impression produced on the old charwoman revealed itself in the remark with which she closed her account of it. "Lawk ma'am! I thought that three or four men must have put together Dombey!"
An elderly cleaner who worked around the place had shown a lot of sympathy during the family’s troubles, so Mrs. Hogarth specifically told her about the upcoming visit and who was coming to the sick room. “Oh my goodness, ma’am!” she exclaimed. “Is the young gentleman upstairs the son of the man who wrote Dombey?” Once reassured about this, she explained her question by saying she never thought there was a man who could have written Dombey. When pressed further about what she thought this mystery of Dombey was (since it was known she couldn’t read), it turned out she lived in a snuff shop run by someone named Douglas, where several other lodgers stayed; and on the first Monday of every month, there was a tea gathering where the landlord read the month’s issue of Dombey, only for those lodgers who subscribed to the tea, but everyone benefitted from the reading. The impression left on the old cleaner was reflected in her final remark about it. “Oh my goodness, ma’am! I thought that three or four men must have written Dombey!”
Dickens thought there was something of a compliment in this, and was not ungrateful.
Dickens saw this as somewhat of a compliment and felt thankful for it.
THE LIFE
OF
CHARLES DICKENS
BY
JOHN FORSTER.
THREE VOLUMES IN TWO.
VOL. II.
————————
BOSTON:
JAMES R. OSGOOD & COMPANY,
(LATE TICKNOR & FIELDS, AND FIELDS, OSGOOD, & CO.)
1875.
CHAPTER XVI.
DOMBEY AND SON.
1846-1848.
Though his proposed new "book in shilling numbers" had been mentioned to me three months before he quitted England, he knew little himself at that time or when he left excepting the fact, then also named, that it was to do with Pride what its predecessor had done with Selfishness. But this limit he soon overpassed; and the succession of independent groups of character, surprising for the variety of their forms and handling, with which he enlarged and enriched his plan, went far beyond the range of the passion of Mr. Dombey and Mr. Dombey's second wife.[338]
Although his idea for a new "book in shilling numbers" had been brought up to me three months before he left England, he knew very little about it at that time or when he departed, other than that it was going to explore Pride in the same way that its predecessor addressed Selfishness. However, he quickly moved beyond that initial idea; the series of distinct groups of characters, notable for their diverse forms and development, that he added to and expanded upon in his plan greatly exceeded the themes found in Mr. Dombey and Mr. Dombey's second wife.[338]
Obvious causes have led to grave under-estimates of this novel. Its first five numbers forced up interest and expectation so high that the rest of necessity fell short; but it is not therefore true of the general conception that thus the wine of it had been drawn, and only the lees left. In the treatment of acknowledged masterpieces in literature it not seldom occurs that the genius and the art of the master have not pulled together to the close; but if a work of imagination is to forfeit its higher meed of praise because its pace at starting has not been uniformly kept, hard measure would have to be dealt to books of undeniable greatness. Among other critical severities it was said here, that Paul died at the beginning not for any need of the story, but only to interest its readers somewhat more; and that Mr. Dombey relented at the end for just the same reason. What is now to be told will show how little ground existed for either imputation. The so-called "violent change" in the hero has more lately been revived in the notices of Mr. Taine, who says of it that "it spoils a fine novel;" but it will be seen that in the apparent change no unnaturalness of change was involved, and certainly the adoption of it was not a sacrifice to "public morality." While every other portion of the tale had to submit to such varieties in development as the characters themselves entailed, the design affecting Paul and his father had been planned from the opening, and was carried without alteration to the close. And of the perfect honesty with which Dickens himself repelled such charges as those to which I have adverted, when he wrote the preface to his collected edition, remarkable proof appears[339] in the letter to myself which accompanied the manuscript of his proposed first number. No other line of the tale had at this time been placed on paper.
Obvious reasons have led to serious underestimates of this novel. Its first five installments generated such high interest and expectations that the rest inevitably fell short; however, it’s not accurate to say that the overall concept of the novel was diminished, leaving only the remnants. When it comes to handling recognized masterpieces in literature, it often happens that the genius and artistry of the creator do not align consistently until the end; yet if a work of imagination is to lose its higher praise simply because its initial momentum isn’t maintained throughout, many undeniably great books would suffer the same fate. Among other critical remarks, it was suggested here that Paul died at the beginning not out of necessity for the story but merely to engage readers more, and that Mr. Dombey showed compassion at the end for the same reason. What I am about to share will demonstrate how unfounded these claims were. The so-called "dramatic change" in the hero has been revisited recently in Mr. Taine's reviews, where he argues that "it spoils a fine novel;" but it will become clear that the apparent change did not involve any unnatural transition, and certainly adopting it was not a concession to "public morality." While every other aspect of the story had to adapt to the various developments brought on by the characters themselves, the plan concerning Paul and his father was established from the start and was carried through to the end without modification. Moreover, the complete honesty with which Dickens himself rejected such accusations, including those I’ve mentioned, is evident in a letter he wrote to me that accompanied the manuscript for his intended first installment, providing remarkable evidence[339] that no other part of the story had been drafted at that time.
When the first chapter only was done, and again when all was finished but eight slips, he had sent me letters formerly quoted. What follows came with the manuscript of the first four chapters on the 25th of July. "I will now go on to give you an outline of my immediate intentions in reference to Dombey. I design to show Mr. D. with that one idea of the Son taking firmer and firmer possession of him, and swelling and bloating his pride to a prodigious extent. As the boy begins to grow up, I shall show him quite impatient for his getting on, and urging his masters to set him great tasks, and the like. But the natural affection of the boy will turn towards the despised sister; and I purpose showing her learning all sorts of things, of her own application and determination, to assist him in his lessons; and helping him always. When the boy is about ten years old (in the fourth number), he will be taken ill, and will die; and when he is ill, and when he is dying, I mean to make him turn always for refuge to the sister still, and keep the stern affection of the father at a distance. So Mr. Dombey—for all his greatness, and for all his devotion to the child—will find himself at arms' length from him even then; and will see that his love and confidence are all bestowed upon his sister, whom Mr. Dombey has used—and so has the boy himself too, for that matter—as a mere convenience and handle to him. The death of the boy is a death-blow, of course, to all the father's schemes and cherished hopes; and 'Dombey and Son,' as Miss[340] Tox will say at the end of the number, 'is a Daughter after all.' . . . From that time, I purpose changing his feeling of indifference and uneasiness towards his daughter into a positive hatred. For he will always remember how the boy had his arm round her neck when he was dying, and whispered to her, and would take things only from her hand, and never thought of him. . . . At the same time I shall change her feeling towards him for one of a greater desire to love him, and to be loved by him; engendered in her compassion for his loss, and her love for the dead boy whom, in his way, he loved so well too. So I mean to carry the story on, through all the branches and offshoots and meanderings that come up; and through the decay and downfall of the house, and the bankruptcy of Dombey, and all the rest of it; when his only staff and treasure, and his unknown Good Genius always, will be this rejected daughter, who will come out better than any son at last, and whose love for him, when discovered and understood, will be his bitterest reproach. For the struggle with himself which goes on in all such obstinate natures, will have ended then; and the sense of his injustice, which you may be sure has never quitted him, will have at last a gentler office than that of only making him more harshly unjust. . . . I rely very much on Susan Nipper grown up, and acting partly as Florence's maid, and partly as a kind of companion to her, for a strong character throughout the book. I also rely on the Toodles, and on Polly, who, like everybody else, will be found by Mr. Dombey to have gone over to his daughter and become attached to her. This is what cooks call 'the stock of the soup.' All kinds[341] of things will be added to it, of course." Admirable is the illustration thus afforded of his way of working, and very interesting the evidence it gives of the genuine feeling for his art with which this book was begun.
When the first chapter was done, and again when everything was finished except for eight slips, he sent me letters I had quoted before. What follows came with the manuscript of the first four chapters on July 25th. "I’ll now give you an outline of my immediate plans for Dombey. I plan to portray Mr. D. with the single idea of his son increasingly taking hold of him, inflating his pride to a huge extent. As the boy grows up, I’ll show him impatient to advance, pushing his teachers to give him big tasks, and so on. But the boy's natural affection will turn towards his unloved sister; I intend to show her learning everything she can, through her own effort and determination, to help him with his lessons, always supporting him. When the boy is around ten (in the fourth installment), he will get sick and die; during his illness and approaching death, I aim to have him always seek comfort from his sister, keeping his father's stern affection at bay. So Mr. Dombey—for all his importance and devotion to the child—will find himself at a distance from him even then; he'll see all the boy's love and trust given to his sister, whom Mr. Dombey—like the boy himself—has used merely as a tool. The boy’s death will obviously be a crushing blow to all the father's plans and hopes; and as Miss[340] Tox will say at the end of the installment, 'is a Daughter after all.' From that point, I intend to shift his feelings from indifference and unease towards his daughter into genuine hatred. He will always remember how the boy had his arm around her neck when he was dying, whispered to her, would only accept things from her hand, and never thought of him. At the same time, I’ll change her feelings towards him into a deeper desire to love him and to be loved by him; this will be driven by her compassion for his loss and her love for the dead boy whom, in his way, he also cherished. I'll carry the story through all its branches, offshoots, and twists that arise; through the decline of the house, Dombey's bankruptcy, and everything else; when his only support and hidden Good Genius will be this rejected daughter, who will ultimately turn out better than any son, and whose love for him, when recognized and understood, will be his greatest regret. The internal struggle that occurs in such stubborn characters will come to an end; and the awareness of his injustice, which has never left him, will finally have a softer role than just making him even more harshly unjust. I count heavily on Susan Nipper growing up to act partly as Florence's maid and partly as a kind of companion for her, providing a strong character throughout the book. I also depend on the Toodles and Polly, who, like everyone else, Mr. Dombey will find has sided with his daughter and become attached to her. This is what cooks refer to as 'the stock of the soup.' Many things will be added to it, of course." It wonderfully illustrates his approach to working, and it’s fascinating evidence of the genuine passion for his art with which this book was started.
The close of the letter put an important question affecting gravely a leading person in the tale. . . . "About the boy, who appears in the last chapter of the first number, I think it would be a good thing to disappoint all the expectations that chapter seems to raise of his happy connection with the story and the heroine, and to show him gradually and naturally trailing away, from that love of adventure and boyish light-heartedness, into negligence, idleness, dissipation, dishonesty, and ruin. To show, in short, that common, every-day, miserable declension of which we know so much in our ordinary life; to exhibit something of the philosophy of it, in great temptations and an easy nature; and to show how the good turns into bad, by degrees. If I kept some little notion of Florence always at the bottom of it, I think it might be made very powerful and very useful. What do you think? Do you think it may be done, without making people angry? I could bring out Solomon Gills and Captain Cuttle well, through such a history; and I descry, anyway, an opportunity for good scenes between Captain Cuttle and Miss Tox. This question of the boy is very important. . . . Let me hear all you think about it. Hear! I wish I could." . . .
The end of the letter raised a significant question that seriously affects a key character in the story. “Regarding the boy who appears in the last chapter of the first issue, I believe it would be wise to subvert all the expectations that chapter creates about his happy relationship with the story and the heroine. Instead, I want to show him naturally drifting away from that love of adventure and youthful carefree attitude into neglect, laziness, excess, dishonesty, and ultimately ruin. In short, I want to depict that common, everyday decline that we are all too familiar with in our lives; to illustrate the philosophy behind it, through major temptations and an easygoing nature; and to show how the good gradually turns bad. If I anchor some notion of Florence throughout, I think it could become very powerful and meaningful. What do you think? Can it be done without upsetting people? I could intertwine Solomon Gills and Captain Cuttle effectively in such a narrative; plus, I see a chance for great interactions between Captain Cuttle and Miss Tox. This question about the boy is very important. Let me know your thoughts. I wish I could hear from you.”
For reasons that need not be dwelt upon here, but in which Dickens ultimately acquiesced, Walter was reserved for a happier future; and the idea thrown out took subsequent shape, amid circumstances better suited to its excellent capabilities, in the striking character[342] of Richard Carstone in the tale of Bleak House. But another point had risen meanwhile for settlement not admitting of delay. In the first enjoyment of writing after his long rest, to which a former letter has referred, he had over-written his number by nearly a fifth; and upon his proposal to transfer the fourth chapter to his second number, replacing it by another of fewer pages, I had to object that this might damage his interest at starting. Thus he wrote on the 7th of August: ". . . I have received your letter to-day with the greatest delight, and am overjoyed to find that you think so well of the number. I thought well of it myself, and that it was a great plunge into a story; but I did not know how far I might be stimulated by my paternal affection. . . . What should you say, for a notion of the illustrations, to 'Miss Tox introduces the Party?' and 'Mr. Dombey and family?' meaning Polly Toodle, the baby, Mr. Dombey, and little Florence: whom I think it would be well to have. Walter, his uncle, and Captain Cuttle, might stand over. It is a great question with me, now, whether I had not better take this last chapter bodily out, and make it the last chapter of the second number; writing some other new one to close the first number. I think it would be impossible to take out six pages without great pangs. Do you think such a proceeding as I suggest would weaken number one very much? I wish you would tell me, as soon as you can after receiving this, what your opinion is on the point. If you thought it would weaken the first number, beyond the counterbalancing advantage of strengthening the second, I would cut down somehow or other, and let it go. I shall be anxious to[343] hear your opinion. In the meanwhile I will go on with the second, which I have just begun. I have not been quite myself since we returned from Chamounix, owing to the great heat." Two days later: "I have begun a little chapter to end the first number, and certainly think it will be well to keep the ten pages of Wally and Co. entire for number two. But this is still subject to your opinion, which I am very anxious to know. I have not been in writing cue all the week; but really the weather has rendered it next to impossible to work." Four days later: "I shall send you with this (on the chance of your being favourable to that view of the subject) a small chapter to close the first number, in lieu of the Solomon Gills one. I have been hideously idle all the week, and have done nothing but this trifling interloper: but hope to begin again on Monday—ding dong. . . . The inkstand is to be cleaned out to-night, and refilled, preparatory to execution. I trust I may shed a good deal of ink in the next fortnight." Then, the day following, on arrival of my letter, he submitted to a hard necessity. "I received yours to-day. A decided facer to me! I had been counting, alas! with a miser's greed, upon the gained ten pages. . . . No matter. I have no doubt you are right, and strength is everything. The addition of two lines to each page, or something less,—coupled with the enclosed cuts, will bring it all to bear smoothly. In case more cutting is wanted, I must ask you to try your hand. I shall agree to whatever you propose." These cuttings, absolutely necessary as they were, were not without much disadvantage; and in the course of them he had to sacrifice[344] a passage foreshadowing his final intention as to Dombey. It would have shown, thus early, something of the struggle with itself that such pride must always go through; and I think it worth preserving in a note.[136]
For reasons that don’t need to be discussed here, which Dickens ultimately accepted, Walter was destined for a brighter future; and the idea proposed was later formed into the striking character of Richard Carstone in the story of Bleak House. However, another issue arose that needed to be resolved without delay. In his initial excitement of writing after his long break, as mentioned in a previous letter, he had written nearly a fifth more than necessary; and when he suggested moving the fourth chapter to his second installment and replacing it with a shorter one, I had to point out that this might hurt his chances right from the start. He wrote on August 7th: “. . . I received your letter today with great joy and am thrilled to hear you think so highly of the number. I felt good about it myself and thought it was a big leap into a story, but I wasn't sure how much my fatherly affection had influenced me. . . . What do you think about this idea for the illustrations, ‘Miss Tox introduces the Party?’ and ‘Mr. Dombey and family?’ referring to Polly Toodle, the baby, Mr. Dombey, and little Florence: whom I think we should include. Walter, his uncle, and Captain Cuttle could be in the background. I'm really wondering now if it would be better to completely remove this last chapter and make it the final chapter of the second number, and write a different one to conclude the first number. I believe it would be impossible to remove six pages without feeling a lot of regret. Do you think this plan would significantly weaken number one? I’d appreciate it if you could let me know your thoughts on this as soon as possible after you get this. If you think it would weaken the first number, beyond the possible benefit of strengthening the second, I’ll find a way to cut it down and let it go. I’m eager to hear your opinion. In the meantime, I’ll continue with the second one, which I’ve just begun. I haven’t quite felt myself since we returned from Chamounix, due to the intense heat.” Two days later: “I’ve started a short chapter to end the first number, and I definitely think it would be best to keep the ten pages of Wally and Co. intact for number two. But this still depends on your opinion, which I’m really anxious to get. I haven’t been in a writing mood all week; but honestly, the weather has made it almost impossible to work.” Four days later: “I’ll send you with this (if you might be inclined to support that perspective) a brief chapter to close the first number, in place of the Solomon Gills chapter. I’ve been horrifically lazy all week and have done nothing but this trivial piece: but I hope to start again on Monday—ding dong. . . . The inkstand is getting cleaned out tonight and refilled, in preparation for action. I hope to spill a lot of ink in the next two weeks.” Then, the day after, upon receiving my letter, he faced a tough reality. “I got yours today. A real blow for me! I had been counting, unfortunately, with a miser’s greed, on those extra ten pages. . . . No matter. I have no doubt you’re right, and strength is everything. Adding two lines to each page, or something less, along with the enclosed cuts, will smooth it all out. If more cutting is needed, I’ll need you to give it a try. I’ll agree to whatever you suggest.” These cuts, while absolutely necessary, came with some drawbacks; and in the process, he had to sacrifice a passage that hinted at his final intention regarding Dombey. It would have revealed early on some of the internal struggle that such pride must always contend with; and I think it’s worth keeping in a note.


Several letters now expressed his anxiety and care about the illustrations. A nervous dread of caricature in the face of his merchant-hero, had led him to indicate by a living person the type of city-gentleman he would have had the artist select; and this is all he meant by his reiterated urgent request, "I do wish he could get a glimpse of A, for he is the very Dombey." But as the glimpse of A was not to be had, it was resolved to send for selection by himself glimpses of other letters of the alphabet, actual heads as well as fanciful[347][346][345] ones; and the sheetful I sent out, which he returned when the choice was made, I here reproduce in fac-simile. In itself amusing, it has now the important use of showing, once for all, in regard to Dickens's intercourse with his artists, that they certainly had not an easy time with him; that, even beyond what is ordinary between author and illustrator, his requirements were exacting; that he was apt, as he has said himself, to build up temples in his mind not always makeable with hands; that in the results he had rarely anything but disappointment; and that of all notions to connect with him the most preposterous would be that which directly reversed these relations, and depicted him as receiving from any artist the inspiration he was always vainly striving to give. An assertion of this kind was contradicted in my first volume; but it has since been repeated so explicitly, that to prevent any possible misconstruction from a silence I would fain have persisted in, the distasteful subject is again reluctantly introduced.
Several letters now showed his anxiety and concern about the illustrations. A nervous fear of caricature concerning his merchant-hero led him to point out a real person as the model for the type of city gentleman he wanted the artist to choose; and this was all he meant by his repeated urgent request, "I really wish he could get a look at A, because he is the perfect Dombey." But since a look at A was not possible, it was decided to request glimpses of other letters of the alphabet, both real faces and imaginative ones; and the collection I sent out, which he returned once the choice was made, I am reproducing here as a facsimile. While amusing in itself, it now serves the important purpose of illustrating, once and for all, that Dickens's interactions with his artists were certainly not easy; that, even more than what is typical between an author and illustrator, his demands were strict; that he was prone, as he admitted himself, to create unattainable visions in his mind; that he mostly faced disappointment in the outcomes; and that of all ideas to associate with him, the most ridiculous would be to suggest that he received inspiration from any artist when he was always desperately trying to provide it. This assertion was refuted in my first volume, but it has since been repeated so clearly that, to avoid any possible misunderstanding from a silence I would have preferred to maintain, I am reluctantly bringing up this uncomfortable topic again.
It originated with a literary friend of the excellent artist by whom Oliver Twist was illustrated from month to month, during the earlier part of its monthly issue. This gentleman stated, in a paper written and published in America, that Mr. Cruikshank, by executing the plates before opportunity was afforded him of seeing the letter press, had suggested to the writer the finest effects in his story; and to this, opposing my clear recollection of all the time the tale was in progress, it became my duty to say that within my own personal knowledge the alleged fact was not true. "Dickens," the artist is reported an saying to his admirer, "ferreted[348] out that bundle of drawings, and when he came to the one which represents Fagin in the cell, he silently studied it for half an hour, and told me he was tempted to change the whole plot of his story. . . . I consented to let him write up to my designs; and that was the way in which Fagin, Sikes, and Nancy were created." Happily I was able to add the complete refutation of this folly by producing a letter of Dickens written at the time, which proved incontestably that the closing illustrations, including the two specially named in support of the preposterous charge, Sikes and his Dog, and Fagin in his Cell, had not even been seen by Dickens until his finished book was on the eve of appearance. As however the distinguished artist, notwithstanding the refreshment of his memory by this letter, has permitted himself again to endorse the statement of his friend, I can only again print, on the same page which contains the strange language used by him, the words with which Dickens himself repels its imputation on his memory. To some it may be more satisfactory if I print the latter in fac-simile; and so leave for ever a charge in itself so incredible that nothing would have justified farther allusion to it but the knowledge of my friend's old and true regard for Mr. Cruikshank, of which evidence will shortly appear, and my own respect for an original genius well able to subsist of itself without taking what belongs to others.
It started with a literary friend of the talented artist who illustrated Oliver Twist month by month during its early publication. This gentleman claimed in an article published in America that Mr. Cruikshank, by creating the illustrations before he had a chance to see the text, inspired the writer with the best ideas for the story. In response, and based on my clear memories of the time the tale was being created, I felt it necessary to assert that this claim was not true. "Dickens," the artist is reported to have said to his admirer, "ferreted[348] out that bundle of drawings, and when he came to the one showing Fagin in the cell, he studied it silently for half an hour and told me he was tempted to change the entire plot of his story. ... I agreed to let him write according to my designs; and that's how Fagin, Sikes, and Nancy came to be." Thankfully, I was able to completely disprove this nonsense by producing a letter from Dickens written at the time, which clearly showed that he had not even seen the final illustrations, including the two specifically mentioned in support of this ridiculous claim—Sikes and his Dog, and Fagin in his Cell—until his finished book was about to be published. However, even after being reminded of this by the letter, the distinguished artist allowed himself to support his friend's statement again, so I can only reiterate on the same page that contains his strange wording, the words with which Dickens himself refutes this suggestion about his memory. For some, it might be more satisfying if I print Dickens' words as they are, and thus forever put to rest a claim so unbelievable that nothing would justify further reference to it except my friend's longstanding and genuine respect for Mr. Cruikshank, which will soon be demonstrated, and my own admiration for an original talent that can stand on its own without taking credit for others' work.
Resuming the Dombey letters I find him on the 30th of August in better heart about his illustrator. "I shall gladly acquiesce in whatever more changes or omissions you propose. Browne seems to be getting on well. . . . He will have a good subject in Paul's christening. Mr.[351] of it. The little chapter of Miss Tox and the Major, which you alas! (but quite wisely) rejected from the first number, I have altered for the last of the second. I have not quite finished the middle chapter yet—having, I should say, three good days' work to do at it; but I hope it will be all a worthy successor to number one. I will send it as soon as finished." Then, a little later: "Browne is certainly interesting himself, and taking pains. I think the cover very good: perhaps with a little too much in it, but that is an ungrateful objection." The second week of September brought me the finished MS. of number two; and his letter of the 3rd of October, noticing objections taken to it, gives additional touches to this picture of him while at work. The matter that engages him is one of his masterpieces. There is nothing in all his writings more perfect, for what it shows of his best qualities, than the life and death of Paul Dombey. The comedy is admirable; nothing strained, everything hearty and wholesome in the laughter and fun; all who contribute to the mirth, Doctor Blimber and his pupils, Mr. Toots, the Chicks and the Toodles, Miss Tox and the Major, Paul and Mrs. Pipchin, up to his highest mark; and the serious scenes never falling short of it, from the death of Paul's mother in the first number, to that of Paul himself in the fifth, which, as a writer of genius[352] with hardly exaggeration said, threw a whole nation into mourning. But see how eagerly this fine writer takes every suggestion, how little of self-esteem and self-sufficiency there is, with what a consciousness of the tendency of his humour to exuberance he surrenders what is needful to restrain it, and of what small account to him is any special piece of work in his care and his considerateness for the general design. I think of Ben Jonson's experience of the greatest of all writers. "He was indeed honest, and of an open and free nature; had an excellent phantasy, brave notions and gentle expressions; wherein he flowed with that facility, that sometimes it was necessary he should be stopped." Who it was that stopped him, and the ease of doing it, no one will doubt. Whether he, as well as the writer of later time, might not with more advantage have been left alone, will be the only question.
Resuming the Dombey letters, I find him on August 30th feeling optimistic about his illustrator. "I’m happy to go along with any other changes or omissions you suggest. Browne seems to be doing well... He'll have a great topic with Paul's christening. Mr.[351] of it. I’ve revised the brief chapter about Miss Tox and the Major, which you sadly (but wisely) turned down from the first issue, for the last of the second. I haven't quite finished the middle chapter yet—I’d say I have three good days of work left on it—but I hope it will be a worthy follow-up to number one. I’ll send it as soon as I’m done." Then, a little later: "Browne is definitely getting involved and putting in effort. I think the cover looks great; maybe it has a bit too much going on, but that’s a minor complaint." The second week of September brought me the completed manuscript of number two, and his letter from October 3rd, addressing the objections raised about it, adds more detail to this image of him while he works. The topic he’s focused on is one of his masterpieces. There’s nothing in all his writings that showcases his best qualities more perfectly than the life and death of Paul Dombey. The comedy is fantastic; nothing feels forced, everything is genuine and wholesome in the laughter and fun; everyone who adds to the humor—Doctor Blimber and his students, Mr. Toots, the Chicks and the Toodles, Miss Tox and the Major, Paul and Mrs. Pipchin—reaches their highest potential; and the serious moments never fall short, from Paul's mother's death in the first issue to Paul's own in the fifth, which, as a genius writer[352] noted without exaggeration, left a whole nation in mourning. But look at how eagerly this great writer embraces every suggestion, how little vanity and self-importance he has, how aware he is of his humor's tendency to go overboard, and how he willingly lets go of what's needed to rein it in, understanding how little any specific piece of his work matters compared to the overall vision. I think of Ben Jonson’s experience with the greatest of all writers. "He was indeed honest, and of an open and free nature; had an excellent imagination, bold ideas, and gentle expressions; in which he flowed with such ease that sometimes it was necessary to hold him back." Who it was that stopped him and how easy it was to do so, no one will question. Whether he, like the later writer, would have been better off left alone is the only question worth asking.
Thus ran the letter of the 3rd of October: "Miss Tox's colony I will smash. Walter's allusion to Carker (would you take it all out?) shall be dele'd. Of course, you understand the man! I turned that speech over in my mind; but I thought it natural that a boy should run on, with such a subject, under the circumstances: having the matter so presented to him. . . . I thought of the possibility of malice on christening points of faith, and put the drag on as I wrote. Where would you make the insertion, and to what effect? That shall be done too. I want you to think the number sufficiently good stoutly to back up the first. It occurs to me—might not your doubt about the christening be a reason for not making the ceremony the subject of an illustration? Just turn this over. Again: if I could[353] do it (I shall have leisure to consider the possibility before I begin), do you think it would be advisable to make number three a kind of half-way house between Paul's infancy, and his being eight or nine years old?—In that case I should probably not kill him until the fifth number. Do you think the people so likely to be pleased with Florence, and Walter, as to relish another number of them at their present age? Otherwise, Walter will be two or three and twenty, straightway. I wish you would think of this. . . . I am sure you are right about the christening. It shall be artfully and easily amended. . . . Eh?"
Thus ran the letter of the 3rd of October: "Miss Tox's colony I will destroy. Walter's reference to Carker (would you take it all out?) will be deleted. Of course, you understand the guy! I thought about that speech; but I felt it was natural for a boy to go on like that, especially given the subject and the situation: having the matter presented to him this way. . . . I considered the possibility of malice regarding important points of faith and slowed down as I wrote. Where would you suggest making the insertion, and for what purpose? That will be done too. I want you to think the number strong enough to confidently support the first. It struck me—could your uncertainty about the christening be a reason to avoid making the ceremony the subject of an illustration? Just think about this. Also: if I could[353] do it (I’ll have time to consider it before I start), do you think it would make sense for number three to be a sort of midway point between Paul’s infancy and when he’s eight or nine years old?—In that case, I probably wouldn’t have him die until the fifth installment. Do you think people will be so pleased with Florence and Walter that they’d want to see another number of them at their current ages? Otherwise, Walter will jump to being twenty-two or twenty-three right away. I wish you would think about this. . . . I’m sure you’re right about the christening. It will be smartly and easily revised. . . . Eh?"
Meanwhile, two days before this letter, his first number had been launched with a sale that transcended his hopes and brought back Nickleby days. The Dombey success "is brilliant!" he wrote to me on the 11th. "I had put before me thirty thousand as the limit of the most extreme success, saying that if we should reach that, I should be more than satisfied and more than happy; you will judge how happy I am! I read the second number here last night to the most prodigious and uproarious delight of the circle. I never saw or heard people laugh so. You will allow me to observe that my reading of the Major has merit." What a valley of the shadow he had just been passing, in his journey through his Christmas book, has before been told; but always, and with only too much eagerness, he sprang up under pressure. "A week of perfect idleness," he wrote to me on the 26th, "has brought me round again—idleness so rusting and devouring, so complete and unbroken, that I am quite glad to write the heading of the first chapter of number three to-day.[354] I shall be slow at first, I fear, in consequence of that change of the plan. But I allow myself nearly three weeks for the number; designing, at present, to start for Paris on the 16th of November. Full particulars in future bills. Just going to bed. I think I can make a good effect, on the after story, of the feeling created by the additional number before Paul's death." . . . Five more days confirmed him in this hope. "I am at work at Dombey with good speed, thank God. All well here. Country stupendously beautiful. Mountains covered with snow. Rich, crisp weather." There was one drawback. The second number had gone out to him, and the illustrations he found to be so "dreadfully bad" that they made him "curl his legs up." They made him also more than usually anxious in regard to a special illustration on which he set much store, for the part he had in hand.
Meanwhile, two days before this letter, his first issue had been released with sales that exceeded his expectations and brought back the days of Nickleby. The Dombey success "is awesome!" he wrote to me on the 11th. "I had set thirty thousand as the benchmark for our most extreme success, saying that if we reached that, I would be more than satisfied and happier than ever; you'll see how happy I am! I read the second issue here last night to the incredible and uproarious delight of the group. I’ve never seen or heard people laugh so hard. You’ll allow me to point out that my reading of the Major has merit." What a challenging time he had just gone through in his journey with his Christmas book had been told before; but always, and with far too much eagerness, he bounced back under pressure. "A week of complete idleness," he wrote to me on the 26th, "has brought me back around—idleness so rusting and consuming, so total and uninterrupted, that I’m actually glad to write the title of the first chapter of issue three today.[354] I fear I will be slow at first because of this change in the plan. But I’m giving myself nearly three weeks for this issue, planning to leave for Paris on the 16th of November. Full details in future announcements. Just heading to bed. I think I can create a strong effect, in the later story, from the emotion stirred by the additional issue before Paul's death." . . . Five more days solidified this hope. "I’m working on Dombey at a good pace, thank God. Everything's fine here. The countryside is stunningly beautiful. Mountains covered in snow. Rich, crisp weather." There was one downside. The second issue had been sent to him, and he found the illustrations to be so "terribly bad" that they made him "curl his legs up." They also made him more than usually anxious about a specific illustration that he valued greatly for the section he was working on.
The first chapter of it was sent me only four days later (nearly half the entire part, so freely his fancy was now flowing and overflowing), with intimation for the artist: "The best subject for Browne will be at Mrs. Pipchin's; and if he liked to do a quiet odd thing, Paul, Mrs. Pipchin, and the Cat, by the fire, would be very good for the story. I earnestly hope he will think it worth a little extra care. The second subject, in case he shouldn't take a second from that same chapter, I will shortly describe as soon as I have it clearly (to-morrow or next day), and send it to you by post." The result was not satisfactory; but as the artist more than redeemed it in the later course of the tale, and the present disappointment was mainly the incentive to that better success, the mention of the[355] failure here will be excused for what it illustrates of Dickens himself. "I am really distressed by the illustration of Mrs. Pipchin and Paul. It is so frightfully and wildly wide of the mark. Good Heaven! in the commonest and most literal construction of the text, it is all wrong. She is described as an old lady, and Paul's 'miniature arm-chair' is mentioned more than once. He ought to be sitting in a little arm-chair down in the corner of the fireplace, staring up at her. I can't say what pain and vexation it is to be so utterly misrepresented. I would cheerfully have given a hundred pounds to have kept this illustration out of the book. He never could have got that idea of Mrs. Pipchin if he had attended to the text. Indeed I think he does better without the text; for then the notion is made easy to him in short description, and he can't help taking it in."
The first chapter was sent to me just four days later (almost half of the entire part, so freely his creativity was flowing), along with a note for the artist: "The best subject for Browne will be at Mrs. Pipchin's; and if he wants to do something quietly odd, Paul, Mrs. Pipchin, and the Cat by the fire would be perfect for the story. I really hope he’ll think it deserves a bit of extra care. The second subject, in case he doesn’t take a second from that same chapter, I will describe shortly as soon as I have it clearly (tomorrow or the next day), and send it to you by post." The result wasn’t satisfactory; but since the artist more than made up for it later in the story, and this current disappointment mainly pushed him toward that better success, mentioning the[355] failure here shows something about Dickens himself. "I am really distressed by the illustration of Mrs. Pipchin and Paul. It is so horribly and wildly off the mark. Good heavens! in the simplest and most literal reading of the text, it’s all wrong. She is described as an old lady, and Paul’s ‘miniature armchair’ is mentioned more than once. He should be sitting in a little armchair down in the corner of the fireplace, staring up at her. I can’t express how much pain and frustration it causes me to be so completely misrepresented. I would gladly have paid a hundred pounds to keep this illustration out of the book. He never could have gotten that idea of Mrs. Pipchin if he had actually paid attention to the text. In fact, I think he does better without the text, because then he can easily grasp the concept from the short description and he can’t help but take it in."
He felt the disappointment more keenly, because the conception of the grim old boarding-house keeper had taken back his thoughts to the miseries of his own child-life, and made her, as her prototype in verity was, a part of the terrible reality.[138] I had forgotten, until I again read this letter of the 4th of November 1846, that he thus early proposed to tell me that story of his boyish sufferings which a question from myself, of some months later date, so fully elicited. He was now hastening on with the close of his third number, to be ready for departure to Paris.
He felt the disappointment more intensely because the image of the harsh old boarding-house owner reminded him of the hardships of his own childhood, making her a part of the harsh reality, just as her true counterpart was. [138] I had forgotten, until I read this letter from November 4, 1846, that he wanted to share the story of his childhood struggles early on, which I ended up drawing out with a question several months later. He was now rushing to finish his third issue so he could leave for Paris.
". . . I hope to finish the number by next Tuesday or Wednesday. It is hard writing under these bird-of-passage circumstances, but I have no reason to complain, God knows, having come to no knot yet. . . . I hope you will like Mrs. Pipchin's establishment. It is from the life, and I was there—I don't suppose I was eight years old; but I remember it all as well, and certainly understood it as well, as I do now. We should be devilish sharp in what we do to children. I thought of that passage in my small life, at Geneva. Shall I leave you my life in MS. when I die? There are some things in it that would touch you very much, and that might go on the same shelf with the first volume of Holcroft's."
"... I hope to finish the piece by next Tuesday or Wednesday. It's tough writing under these unpredictable conditions, but I have no reason to complain, that's for sure, since I haven't hit a dead end yet. I hope you’ll enjoy Mrs. Pipchin's place. It's based on real life, and I was there—I don't think I was older than eight; but I remember it all clearly and understood it just as well then as I do now. We should be really careful about how we treat children. I thought about that time in my early life in Geneva. Should I leave you my life story in manuscript form when I pass away? There are some things in it that would really move you, and that could sit nicely on the same shelf as the first volume of Holcroft's."
On the Monday week after that was written he left Lausanne for Paris, and my first letter to him there was to say that he had overwritten his number by three pages. "I have taken out about two pages and a half," he wrote by return from the hotel Brighton, "and the rest I must ask you to take out with the assurance that you will satisfy me in whatever you do. The sale, prodigious indeed! I am very thankful." Next day he wrote as to Walter. "I see it will be best as you advise, to give that idea up; and indeed I don't feel it would be reasonable to carry it out now. I am far from sure it could be wholesomely done, after the interest he has acquired. But when I have disposed of Paul (poor boy!) I will consider the subject farther." The subject was never resumed. He was at the opening of his admirable fourth part, when, on the 6th of December, he wrote from the Rue de Courcelles: "Here am I, writing letters, and delivering opinions, politico-economical and otherwise, as if there were no undone number,[357] and no undone Dick! Well. Cosi va il mondo (God bless me! Italian! I beg your pardon)—and one must keep one's spirits up, if possible, even under Dombey pressure. Paul, I shall slaughter at the end of number five. His school ought to be pretty good, but I haven't been able to dash at it freely, yet. However, I have avoided unnecessary dialogue so far, to avoid overwriting; and all I have written is point."
On the Monday a week after that was written, he left Lausanne for Paris, and my first letter to him there was to say that he had written three pages too many. "I've removed about two and a half pages," he replied from the Hotel Brighton, "and I need you to take out the rest with the promise that you'll do what satisfies me. The sale is truly amazing! I'm very grateful." The next day he wrote about Walter. "I see it’s best to let that idea go, as you suggested; and honestly, it doesn’t seem reasonable to follow through with it now. I'm not sure it could be done healthily, considering the interest he’s gained. But once I deal with Paul (poor boy!), I’ll think about it more." The topic was never brought up again. He was at the start of his excellent fourth part when, on December 6th, he wrote from the Rue de Courcelles: "Here I am, writing letters and sharing opinions, political-economic and otherwise, as if there weren’t an unfinished number,[357] and no unfinished Dick! Well. Cosi va il mondo (Good heavens! Italian! I’m sorry)—and one must try to stay positive if possible, even under Dombey pressure. Paul, I’ll finish off at the end of number five. His school should be decent, but I haven't been able to dive into it yet. Anyway, I've kept unnecessary dialogue to a minimum so far to avoid overwriting; and all I've written is to the point."
And so, in "point," it went to the close; the rich humour of its picture of Doctor Blimber and his pupils alternating with the quaint pathos of its picture of little Paul; the first a good-natured exposure of the forcing-system and its fruits, as useful as the sterner revelation in Nickleby of the atrocities of Mr. Squeers, and the last even less attractive for the sweetness and sadness of its foreshadowing of a child's death, than for those strange images of a vague, deep thoughtfulness, of a shrewd unconscious intellect, of mysterious small philosophies and questionings, by which the young old-fashioned little creature has a glamour thrown over him as he is passing away. It was wonderfully original, this treatment of the part that thus preceded the close of Paul's little life; and of which the first conception, as I have shown, was an afterthought. It quite took the death itself out of the region of pathetic commonplaces, and gave to it the proper relation to the sorrow of the little sister that survives it. It is a fairy vision to a piece of actual suffering; a sorrow with heaven's hues upon it, to a sorrow with all the bitterness of earth.
And so, in "point," it came to an end; the rich humor in its portrayal of Doctor Blimber and his students alternates with the quaint sadness in its depiction of little Paul. The first is a lighthearted critique of the forcing-system and its outcomes, just as valuable as the harsher truth revealed in Nickleby about Mr. Squeers’s abuses, while the latter is less appealing for its sweetness and sorrow with foreshadowing of a child's death, more so for those strange images of vague, deep thoughtfulness, a keen unconscious intellect, and mysterious little philosophies and questions that give the young, old-fashioned child a certain allure as he fades away. This approach to the segment that leads up to Paul's brief life was remarkably original and, as I have shown, initially conceived as an afterthought. It entirely elevates the death beyond typical sentimentality, establishing the right connection to the grief of the little sister who remains. It transforms a fairytale vision into a scene of genuine suffering; a sorrow touched by heavenly hues, contrasting with a grief steeped in all the bitterness of reality.
The number had been finished, he had made his visit to London, and was again in the Rue de Courcelles, when on Christmas day he sent me its hearty[358] old wishes, and a letter of Jeffrey's on his new story of which the first and second part had reached him. "Many merry Christmases, many happy new years, unbroken friendship, great accumulation of cheerful recollections, affection on earth, and Heaven at last! . . . Is it not a strange example of the hazard of writing in parts, that a man like Jeffrey should form his notion of Dombey and Miss Tox on three months' knowledge? I have asked him the same question, and advised him to keep his eye on both of them as time rolls on.[139] I[359] do not at heart, however, lay much real stress on his opinion, though one is naturally proud of awakening such sincere interest in the breast of an old man who has so long worn the blue and yellow. . . . He certainly did some service in his old criticisms, especially to Crabbe. And though I don't think so highly of Crabbe as I once did (feeling a dreary want of fancy in his poems), I think he deserved the pains-taking and conscientious tracking with which Jeffrey followed him". . . . Six days later he described himself sitting down to the performance of one of his greatest achievements, his number five, "most abominably dull and stupid. I have only written a slip, but I hope to get to work in strong earnest to-morrow. It occurred to me on special reflection, that the first chapter should be with Paul and Florence, and that it should leave a pleasant impression of the little fellow being happy, before the reader is called upon to see him die. I mean to have a genteel breaking-up at Doctor Blimber's therefore, for the Midsummer vacation; and to show him in a little quiet light (now dawning through the chinks of my mind), which I hope will create an agreeable impression." Then, two days later: ". . . I am working very slowly. You will see in the first two or three lines of the enclosed first subject, with what idea I am ploughing along. It is difficult; but a new way of doing it, it strikes me, and likely to be pretty."
The number was done, he had visited London, and was back on Rue de Courcelles when, on Christmas Day, he sent me warm old wishes and a letter from Jeffrey about his new story, the first and second parts of which he had received. "Wishing you many merry Christmases, many happy New Years, unbroken friendship, a lot of cheerful memories, love here on earth, and Heaven in the end!... Isn’t it strange how writing in parts can lead someone like Jeffrey to form his opinion of Dombey and Miss Tox based on just three months of knowledge? I’ve asked him the same thing and suggested he keep an eye on both of them as time goes by. I don’t take his opinion too seriously, though it’s natural to feel proud that I can spark such genuine interest in an old man who has long worn the blue and yellow... He definitely contributed to the literary world with his old critiques, especially regarding Crabbe. And although I don’t think as highly of Crabbe as I used to (I find a dull lack of imagination in his poems), I believe he deserved the careful and thorough attention that Jeffrey gave him... Six days later, he described himself sitting down to tackle one of his greatest works, number five, which he called "most abominably dull and stupid." He mentioned, "I’ve only written a bit, but I hope to get serious work done tomorrow. After thinking about it, I realized that the first chapter should feature Paul and Florence and should leave a nice impression of the little guy being happy before the reader has to see him die. I plan to create a pleasant ending at Doctor Blimber’s for the Midsummer vacation, showing him in a gentle light (which is now starting to shine through the cracks in my mind), and I hope it will leave a good impression." Then, two days later: "...I am working very slowly. You’ll see in the first two or three lines of the enclosed first draft the idea I'm sticking with. It’s tough, but I think I’ve found a new angle to tackle it, and it’s likely to turn out nicely."
And then, after three days more, came something of a damper to his spirits, as he thus toiled along. He saw public allusion made to a review that had appeared in the Times of his Christmas book, and it momentarily touched what he too truly called his morbid susceptibility[360] to exasperation. "I see that the 'good old Times' are again at issue with the inimitable B. Another touch of a blunt razor on B.'s nervous system.—Friday morning. Inimitable very mouldy and dull. Hardly able to work. Dreamed of Timeses all night. Disposed to go to New Zealand and start a magazine." But soon he sprang up, as usual, more erect for the moment's pressure; and after not many days I heard that the number was as good as done. His letter was very brief, and told me that he had worked so hard the day before (Tuesday, the 12th of January), and so incessantly, night as well as morning, that he had breakfasted and lain in bed till midday. "I hope I have been very successful." There was but one small chapter more to write, in which he and his little friend were to part company for ever; and the greater part of the night of the day on which it was written, Thursday the 14th, he was wandering desolate and sad about the streets of Paris. I arrived there the following morning on my visit; and as I alighted from the malle-poste, a little before eight o'clock, found him waiting for me at the gate of the post-office bureau.
And then, after three more days, something dampened his spirits while he worked. He saw a mention of a review in the Times about his Christmas book, which briefly triggered what he accurately called his overly sensitive nature to irritation. "I see that the 'good old Times' are once again taking issue with the inimitable B. Just another jab at B.'s nerves. —Friday morning. The inimitable is feeling very stale and boring. Almost unable to work. Dreamed about Timeses all night. Thinking about going to New Zealand and starting a magazine." But soon he perked up, as usual, more upright under the moment's pressure; and after just a few days, I heard that the latest issue was nearly finished. His letter was very short, saying he had worked so hard the day before (Tuesday, January 12th), and so continuously, both night and morning, that he had breakfasted and stayed in bed until noon. "I hope I have been very successful." There was only one small chapter left to write, in which he and his little friend would part ways forever; and most of the night on the day it was written, Thursday the 14th, he wandered sadly around the streets of Paris. I arrived there the next morning for my visit; and as I got off the coach, a little before eight o'clock, I found him waiting for me at the post-office entrance.
I left him on the 2nd of February with his writing-table in readiness for number six; but on the 4th, enclosing me subjects for illustration, he told me he was "not under weigh yet. Can't begin." Then, on the 7th, his birthday, he wrote to warn me he should be late. "Could not begin before Thursday last, and find it very difficult indeed to fall into the new vein of the story. I see no hope of finishing before the 16th at the earliest, in which case the steam will have to be put on for this short month. But it can't be helped.[361] Perhaps I shall get a rush of inspiration. . . . I will send the chapters as I write them, and you must not wait, of course, for me to read the end in type. To transfer to Florence, instantly, all the previous interest, is what I am aiming at. For that, all sorts of other points must be thrown aside in this number. . . . We are going to dine again at the Embassy to-day—with a very ill will on my part. All well. I hope when I write next I shall report myself in better cue. . . . I have had a tremendous outpouring from Jeffrey about the last part, which he thinks the best thing past, present, or to come."[140] Three more days and I had the MS. of the completed chapter, nearly half the number (in which as printed it stands second, the small middle chapter having been transposed to its place). "I have taken the most prodigious pains with it; the difficulty, immediately after Paul's death, being very great. May you like it! My head aches over it now (I write at one o'clock in the morning), and I am[362] strange to it. . . . I think I shall manage Dombey's second wife (introduced by the Major), and the beginning of that business in his present state of mind, very naturally and well. . . . Paul's death has amazed Paris. All sorts of people are open-mouthed with admiration. . . . When I have done, I'll write you such a letter! Don't cut me short in your letters just now, because I'm working hard. . . . I'll make up. . . . Snow—snow—snow—a foot thick." The day after this, came the brief chapter which was printed as the first; and then, on the 16th, which he had fixed as his limit for completion, the close reached me; but I had meanwhile sent him out so much of the proof as convinced him that he had underwritten his number by at least two pages, and determined him to come to London. The incident has been told which soon after closed his residence abroad, and what remained of his story was written in England.
I left him on February 2nd with his writing desk ready for number six; but on the 4th, he sent me topics for illustration and said he was "not up to speed yet. Can't start." Then, on the 7th, his birthday, he wrote to let me know he would be late. "I couldn't start before last Thursday, and I find it really hard to get into the new flow of the story. I don’t expect to finish before the 16th at the earliest, in which case we’ll have to speed things up for this short month. But there’s nothing to be done about it. Maybe I’ll get a burst of inspiration... I’ll send the chapters as I write them, and you must not wait for me to read the end in print. Transferring all the interest to Florence instantly is my goal. To do that, I’ll have to set aside all sorts of other points in this issue... We’re going to have dinner at the Embassy again today—with a lot of reluctance on my part. All is well. I hope when I write again I’ll have better news about myself... I just had a huge outpouring from Jeffrey about the last section, which he thinks is the best thing ever." Three days later, I had the manuscript of the completed chapter, almost half of the issue (in which, as printed, it appears second, the small middle chapter having been moved to its place). "I’ve put in a tremendous amount of effort on it; the challenge right after Paul's death has been really tough. I hope you like it! My head hurts from it now (I’m writing at one in the morning), and I’m feeling strange about it... I think I’ll handle Dombey’s second wife (introduced by the Major), and the start of that plot in his current state of mind, in a very natural and good way... Paul’s death has shocked Paris. All sorts of people are in awe... When I’m done, I'll write you such a letter! Don’t cut me short in your letters right now, because I’m working hard... I’ll make up for it... Snow—snow—snow—a foot deep." The day after this, came the short chapter that was printed first; and then, on the 16th, which he had set as his deadline for completion, I received the closing part; but in the meantime, I had sent him enough of the proof to convince him that he had underwritten his section by at least two pages, prompting him to come to London. The incident has been recounted that soon after ended his time abroad, and the rest of his story was written in England.
I shall not farther dwell upon it in any detail. It extended over the whole of the year; and the interest and passion of it, when to himself both became centred in Florence and in Edith Dombey, took stronger hold of him, and more powerfully affected him, than had been the case in any of his previous writings, I think, excepting only the close of the Old Curiosity Shop. Jeffrey compared Florence to little Nell, but the differences from the outset are very marked, and it is rather in what disunites or separates them that we seem to find the purpose aimed at. If the one, amid much strange and grotesque violence surrounding her, expresses the innocent, unconsciousness of childhood to such rough ways of the world, passing unscathed as[363] Una to her home beyond it, the other is this character in action and resistance, a brave young resolute heart that will not be crushed, and neither sinks nor yields, but from earth's roughest trials works out her own redemption even here. Of Edith from the first Jeffrey judged more rightly; and, when the story was nearly half done, expressed his opinion about her, and about the book itself, in language that pleased Dickens for the special reason that at the time this part of the book had seemed to many to have fallen greatly short of the splendour of its opening. Jeffrey said however quite truly, claiming to be heard with authority as his "Critic-laureate," that of all his writings it was perhaps the most finished in diction, and that it equalled the best in the delicacy and fineness of its touches, "while it rises to higher and deeper passions, not resting, like most of the former, in sweet thoughtfulness, and thrilling and attractive tenderness, but boldly wielding all the lofty and terrible elements of tragedy, and bringing before us the appalling struggles of a proud, scornful, and repentant spirit." Not that she was exactly this. Edith's worst qualities are but the perversion of what should have been her best. A false education in her, and a tyrant passion in her husband, make them other than Nature meant; and both show how life may run its evil course against the higher dispensations.
I won't go into much detail about it. It lasted for the entire year; and the interest and passion he felt, as they focused on Florence and Edith Dombey, affected him more deeply than in any of his earlier works, except maybe for the end of the Old Curiosity Shop. Jeffrey compared Florence to Little Nell, but the differences from the start are quite clear, and it's more about what sets them apart that highlights the intended purpose. While one, amidst a lot of strange and grotesque violence, reflects the innocent unawareness of childhood to the harsh realities of the world, moving through it unscathed like Una on her way home, the other is a character filled with action and resistance—a brave, determined heart that will not be crushed and neither sinks nor yields, but from life's toughest challenges achieves her own redemption even here. Jeffrey understood Edith better from the beginning; and when the story was almost halfway through, he shared his thoughts about her and the book itself in a way that pleased Dickens, especially since this part of the book had seemed to many to fall short of the brilliance of its beginning. However, Jeffrey honestly claimed, with the authority of his title as "Critic-laureate," that of all his works, this one was perhaps the most polished in language, matching the best in its delicacy and finesse, "while it rises to greater and deeper emotions, not lingering like most of the earlier works in sweet thoughtfulness and captivating tenderness, but boldly engaging all the high and terrifying elements of tragedy, showcasing the horrifying struggles of a proud, defiant, and remorseful spirit." Not that she was precisely this. Edith's worst traits are merely a distortion of her best ones. A misguided upbringing and a tyrannical passion in her husband have turned them into something other than what nature intended; both illustrate how life can take a damaging path against higher principles.
As the catastrophe came in view, a nice point in the management of her character and destiny arose. I quote from a letter of the 19th of November, when he was busy with his fourteenth part. "Of course she hates Carker in the most deadly degree. I have not elaborated that, now, because (as I was explaining to[364] Browne the other day) I have relied on it very much for the effect of her death. But I have no question that what you suggest will be an improvement. The strongest place to put it in, would be the close of the chapter immediately before this last one. I want to make the two first chapters as light as I can, but I will try to do it, solemnly, in that place." Then came the effect of this fourteenth number on Jeffrey; raising the question of whether the end might not come by other means than her death, and bringing with it a more bitter humiliation for her destroyer. While engaged on the fifteenth (21st December) Dickens thus wrote to me: "I am thoroughly delighted that you like what I sent. I enclose designs. Shadow-plate, poor. But I think Mr. Dombey admirable. One of the prettiest things in the book ought to be at the end of the chapter I am writing now. But in Florence's marriage, and in her subsequent return to her father, I see a brilliant opportunity. . . . Note from Jeffrey this morning, who won't believe (positively refuses) that Edith is Carker's mistress. What do you think of a kind of inverted Maid's Tragedy, and a tremendous scene of her undeceiving Carker, and giving him to know that she never meant that?" So it was done; and when he sent me the chapter in which Edith says adieu to Florence, I had nothing but praise and pleasure to express. "I need not say," he wrote in reply, "I can't, how delighted and overjoyed I am by what you say and feel of it. I propose to show Dombey twice more; and in the end, leave him exactly as you describe." The end came; and, at the last moment when correction was possible, this note arrived. "I suddenly remember[365] that I have forgotten Diogenes. Will you put him in the last little chapter? After the word 'favourite' in reference to Miss Tox, you can add, 'except with Diogenes, who is growing old and wilful.' Or, on the last page of all, after 'and with them two children: boy and girl' (I quote from memory), you might say 'and an old dog is generally in their company,' or to that effect. Just what you think best."
As the disaster loomed, a pivotal moment in her character and fate emerged. I quote from a letter dated November 19, when he was working on his fourteenth part. "Of course, she hates Carker intensely. I haven’t focused on that yet because, as I was explaining to[364]Browne the other day, I’ve relied on it a lot for the impact of her death. But I have no doubt that your suggestion would enhance it. The best place to include it would be at the end of the chapter just before this last one. I want to keep the first two chapters as light as possible, but I will make an effort to do it earnestly in that spot." Then came the impact of this fourteenth issue on Jeffrey, raising the question of whether the conclusion might come about through means other than her death, and potentially inflicting a more painful humiliation on her destroyer. While working on the fifteenth (December 21), Dickens wrote to me: "I’m really happy you liked what I sent. I’m including some designs. The shadow-plate is poor. But I think Mr. Dombey is outstanding. One of the prettiest things in the book should be at the end of the chapter I'm currently writing. But in Florence’s marriage and her later return to her father, I see a brilliant opportunity. . . . I got a note from Jeffrey this morning, who absolutely refuses to believe that Edith is Carker’s mistress. What do you think about a sort of inverted Maid’s Tragedy, and a huge scene where she reveals the truth to Carker, making it clear she never intended that?" So it was done; and when he sent me the chapter where Edith says goodbye to Florence, I had nothing but praise and joy to express. "I need not say," he wrote in response, "I can’t tell you how thrilled and overjoyed I am by what you say and feel about it. I plan to show Dombey twice more, and in the end, leave him exactly as you described." The conclusion came, and at the last possible moment when corrections were feasible, this note arrived. "I just remembered[365] that I forgot Diogenes. Will you include him in the final little chapter? After the word 'favorite' in reference to Miss Tox, you can add, 'except for Diogenes, who is getting old and stubborn.' Or, on the very last page, after 'and with them two children: boy and girl' (I’m quoting from memory), you might say 'and an old dog is usually in their company,' or something like that. Just do what you think is best."
That was on Saturday the 25th of March, 1848, and may be my last reference to Dombey until the book, in its place with the rest, finds critical allusion when I close. But as the confidences revealed in this chapter have dealt wholly with the leading currents of interest, there is yet room for a word on incidental persons in the story, of whom I have seen other so-called confidences alleged which it will be only right to state have really no authority. And first let me say what unquestionable evidence these characters give of the unimpaired freshness, richness, variety, and fitness of Dickens's invention at this time. Glorious Captain Cuttle, laying his head to the wind and fighting through everything; his friend Jack Bunsby,[141] with a head too ponderous to lay-to, and so falling victim to the inveterate MacStinger; good-hearted, modest, considerate Toots, whose brains rapidly go as his whiskers come, but who yet gets back from contact with the world, in his shambling way, some fragments of the sense pumped[366] out of him by the forcing Blimbers; breathless Susan Nipper, beaming Polly Toodle, the plaintive Wickham, and the awful Pipchin, each with her duty in the starched Dombey household so nicely appointed as to seem born for only that; simple thoughtful old Gills and his hearty young lad of a nephew; Mr. Toodle and his children, with the charitable grinder's decline and fall; Miss Tox, obsequious flatterer from nothing but good-nature; spectacled and analytic, but not unkind Miss Blimber; and the good droning dull benevolent Doctor himself, withering even the fruits of his well-spread dinner-table with his It is remarkable, Mr. Feeder, that the Romans—"at the mention of which terrible people, their implacable enemies, every young gentleman fastened his gaze upon the Doctor, with an assumption of the deepest interest." So vivid and life-like were all these people, to the very youngest of the young gentlemen, that it became natural eagerly to seek out for them actual prototypes; but I think I can say with some confidence of them all, that, whatever single traits may have been taken from persons known to him (a practice with all writers, and very specially with Dickens), only two had living originals. His own experience of Mrs. Pipchin has been related; I had myself some knowledge of Miss Blimber; and the Little Wooden Midshipman did actually (perhaps does still) occupy his post of observation in Leadenhall-street. The names that have been connected, I doubt not in perfect good faith, with Sol Gills, Perch the messenger, and Captain Cuttle, have certainly not more foundation than the fancy a courteous correspondent favours me with, that the redoubtable Captain must[367] have sat for his portrait to Charles Lamb's blustering, loud-talking, hook-handed Mr. Mingay. As to the amiable and excellent city-merchant whose name has been given to Mr. Dombey, he might with the same amount of justice or probability be supposed to have originated Coriolanus or Timon of Athens.
That was on Saturday, March 25, 1848, and this might be my last mention of Dombey until the book is properly placed with the rest and referenced when I finish. But since the insights shared in this chapter have focused entirely on the main threads of interest, there's still room to touch on some incidental characters in the story. I've seen various claims regarding these characters that, I must clarify, have no real authority. First off, let me highlight how undeniably vivid, rich, varied, and fitting Dickens's creativity was at this time. There’s the glorious Captain Cuttle, braving every challenge; his friend Jack Bunsby, whose head is too heavy to brace against the wind, falling prey to the relentless MacStinger; the good-hearted, modest, and considerate Toots, whose intelligence wanes as his beard grows, yet somehow manages to glean bits of wisdom from the world in his awkward way, despite the pressures from the Blimbers; the breathless Susan Nipper, bright Polly Toodle, the sorrowful Wickham, and the dreadful Pipchin, each fulfilling their roles in the meticulously organized Dombey household as if born for it. There’s also the simple, thoughtful old Gills and his lively young nephew; Mr. Toodle and his kids, facing the decline of the charitable grinder; Miss Tox, a sycophantic flatterer purely out of kindness; the spectacles-wearing, analytical but not unkind Miss Blimber; and the good-natured, droning Doctor himself, who even manages to dampen the delights of his well-prepared dinner with his “It is remarkable, Mr. Feeder, that the Romans”—"which made every young gentleman gaze at the Doctor with a show of deep interest." These characters were so vivid and lifelike to even the youngest gentlemen that it naturally led them to search for real-life counterparts; however, I can confidently say that, regardless of any specific traits drawn from people he knew (a common practice among all writers, especially Dickens), only two had living originals. His own experiences with Mrs. Pipchin have been shared; I had some acquaintance with Miss Blimber; and the Little Wooden Midshipman did actually (and perhaps still does) hold a watchful post in Leadenhall Street. The names that have been associated, I am sure in good faith, with Sol Gills, Perch the messenger, and Captain Cuttle, have no more basis than the notion a polite correspondent has suggested to me: that the formidable Captain must have posed for his portrait as Charles Lamb's boisterous, loud-talking, hook-handed Mr. Mingay. As for the kind and remarkable city merchant who has been linked to Mr. Dombey, it would be just as reasonable to think he could have inspired Coriolanus or Timon of Athens.
CHAPTER XVII.
SPLENDID STROLLING.
1847-1852.
Devonshire Terrace remaining still in possession of Sir James Duke, a house was taken in Chester-place, Regent's-park, where, on the 18th of April, his fifth son, to whom he gave the name of Sydney Smith Haldimand, was born.[142] Exactly a month before, we[369] had attended together the funeral, at Highgate, of his publisher Mr. William Hall, his old regard for whom had survived the recent temporary cloud, and with whom he had the association as well of his first success, as of much kindly intercourse not forgotten at this sad time. Of the summer months that followed, the greater part was passed by him at Brighton or Broadstairs; and the chief employment of his leisure, in the intervals of Dombey, was the management of an enterprise originating in the success of our private play, of which the design was to benefit a great man of letters.
Devonshire Terrace was still owned by Sir James Duke when a house was rented in Chester-place, Regent's Park, where, on April 18th, his fifth son, whom he named Sydney Smith Haldimand, was born.[142] Exactly a month earlier, we[369] had attended the funeral of his publisher, Mr. William Hall, at Highgate. His long-standing affection for Hall had endured despite a recent temporary conflict, and he was reminded of both his first success and many fond interactions with Hall during that somber time. During the subsequent summer months, he spent most of his time in Brighton or Broadstairs, and his main focus during his downtime, between writing Dombey, was managing a project that arose from the success of our private play, aimed at benefiting a prominent writer.
The purpose and the name had hardly been announced, when, with the statesmanlike attention to literature and its followers for which Lord John Russell has been eccentric among English politicians, a civil-list pension of two hundred a year was granted to Leigh Hunt; but though this modified our plan so far as to strike out of it performances meant to be given in London, so much was still thought necessary as might clear off past liabilities, and enable one of the[370] most genuine of writers better to enjoy the easier future that had at last been opened to him. Reserving therefore anything realized beyond a certain sum for a dramatic author of merit, Mr. John Poole, to whom help had become also important, it was proposed to give, on Leigh Hunt's behalf, two representations of Ben Jonson's comedy, one at Manchester and the other at Liverpool, to be varied by different farces in each place; and with a prologue of Talfourd's which Dickens was to deliver in Manchester, while a similar address by Sir Edward Bulwer Lytton was to be spoken by me in Liverpool. Among the artists and writers associated in the scheme were Mr. Frank Stone, Mr. Augustus Egg, Mr. John Leech, and Mr. George Cruikshank; Mr. Douglas Jerrold, Mr. Mark Lemon, Mr. Dudley Costello, and Mr. George Henry Lewes; the general management and supreme control being given to Dickens.
The purpose and the name had barely been announced when, with the noteworthy attention to literature and its followers that Lord John Russell has shown among English politicians, a civil-list pension of two hundred a year was granted to Leigh Hunt. This changed our plan enough to exclude performances intended for London, but we still felt it was necessary to cover past debts and allow one of the[370] most genuine writers to better enjoy the easier future that had finally opened up for him. Therefore, reserving anything earned beyond a certain amount for a deserving playwright, Mr. John Poole, who also needed assistance, it was proposed to give, on Leigh Hunt's behalf, two performances of Ben Jonson's comedy—one in Manchester and the other in Liverpool—with different farces in each city. Additionally, a prologue by Talfourd was to be delivered by Dickens in Manchester, while a similar speech by Sir Edward Bulwer Lytton was to be presented by me in Liverpool. Among the artists and writers involved in the project were Mr. Frank Stone, Mr. Augustus Egg, Mr. John Leech, and Mr. George Cruikshank; Mr. Douglas Jerrold, Mr. Mark Lemon, Mr. Dudley Costello, and Mr. George Henry Lewes. The overall management and top control were given to Dickens.
Leading men in both cities contributed largely to the design, and my friend Mr. Alexander Ireland of Manchester has lately sent me some letters not more characteristic of the energy of Dickens in regard to it than of the eagerness of every one addressed to give what help they could. Making personal mention of his fellow-sharers in the enterprise he describes the troop, in one of those letters, as "the most easily governable company of actors on earth;" and to this he had doubtless brought them, but not very easily. One or two of his managerial troubles at rehearsals remain on record in letters to myself, and may give amusement still. Comedy and farces are referred to indiscriminately, but the farces were the most recurring plague. "Good Heaven![371] I find that A. hasn't twelve words, and I am in hourly expectation of rebellion!"—"You were right about the green baize, that it would certainly muffle the voices; and some of our actors, by Jove, haven't too much of that commodity at the best."—"B. shocked me so much the other night by a restless, stupid movement of his hands in his first scene with you, that I took a turn of an hour with him yesterday morning, and I hope quieted his nerves a little."—"I made a desperate effort to get C. to give up his part. Yet in spite of all the trouble he gives me I am sorry for him, he is so evidently hurt by his own sense of not doing well. He clutched the part, however, tenaciously; and three weary times we dragged through it last night."—"That infernal E. forgets everything."—"I plainly see that F. when nervous, which he is sure to be, loses his memory. Moreover his asides are inaudible, even at Miss Kelly's; and as regularly as I stop him to say them again, he exclaims (with a face of agony) that 'he'll speak loud on the night,' as if anybody ever did without doing it always!"—"G. not born for it at all, and too innately conceited, I much fear, to do anything well. I thought him better last night, but I would as soon laugh at a kitchen poker."—"Fancy H. ten days after the casting of that farce, wanting F.'s part therein! Having himself an excellent old man in it already, and a quite admirable part in the other farce." From which it will appear that my friend's office was not a sinecure, and that he was not, as few amateur-managers have ever been, without the experiences of Peter Quince. Fewer still, I suspect, have fought through them with such perfect success, for the company turned out at last[372] would have done credit to any enterprise. They deserved the term applied to them by Maclise, who had invented it first for Macready, on his being driven to "star" in the provinces when his managements in London closed. They were "splendid strollers."[143]
Leading men in both cities played a big role in the design, and my friend Mr. Alexander Ireland from Manchester recently sent me some letters that show not only Dickens's energy regarding it but also the eagerness of everyone involved to lend a hand. Mentioning his fellow contributors to the project, he describes the group in one of those letters as "the most easily governable company of actors on earth;" and he certainly had a hand in that, though it wasn’t easy. A few of his management struggles during rehearsals are noted in letters to me and might still bring some laughs. Comedy and farces are mentioned interchangeably, but the farces were the biggest headache. "Good heavens! I find that A. doesn’t have twelve words, and I'm expecting rebellion any hour now!"—"You were right about the green baize; it definitely muffles the voices, and some of our actors, by Jove, aren’t blessed with that quality in the first place."—"B. shocked me the other night with his restless, silly movements in his first scene with you, so I spent an hour with him yesterday morning, hoping to calm his nerves a bit."—"I made a desperate attempt to get C. to drop his part. Yet despite the trouble he causes me, I feel bad for him since he’s clearly distressed by his own sense of not performing well. He clung to the role, though; and we slogged through it three exhausting times last night."—"That infernal E. forgets everything."—"I can see that F., when he’s nervous, which he always is, loses his memory. Plus, his asides are inaudible, even when he's with Miss Kelly; and every time I stop him to repeat them, he cries (with a pained expression) that he'll be loud on the night, as if anyone ever did without always doing it!"—"G. simply isn’t suited for this and, I fear, is too stubbornly conceited to do anything well. I thought he was better last night, but I’d just as soon laugh at a kitchen poker."—"Imagine H. ten days after casting that farce, asking for F.'s role in it! He already has a great old man part in it and a pretty good role in the other farce." From this, it's clear that my friend's job was no easy task, and he wasn’t, like most amateur managers, without his share of Peter Quince’s experiences. I suspect fewer still have navigated them with such great success, as the final company would have been a credit to any venture. They deserved the title given to them by Maclise, who originally coined it for Macready when he had to "star" in the provinces after his London managements ended. They were "splendid strollers."
On Monday the 26th July we played at Manchester, and on Wednesday the 28th at Liverpool; the comedy being followed on the first night by A Good Night's Rest and Turning the Tables, and on the second by Comfortable Lodgings, or Paris in 1750; and the receipts being, on the first night £440 12s, and on the second, £463 8s. 6d. But though the married members of the company who took their wives defrayed that part of the cost, and every one who acted paid three pounds ten to the benefit-fund for his hotel charges, the expenses were necessarily so great that the profit was reduced to four hundred guineas, and, handsomely as this realised the design, expectations had been raised to five hundred. There was just that shade[374] of disappointment, therefore, when, shortly after we came back and Dickens had returned to Broadstairs, I was startled by a letter from him. On the 3rd of August he had written: "All well. Children" (who had been going through whooping cough) "immensely improved. Business arising out of the late blaze of triumph, worse than ever." Then came what startled me, the very next day. As if his business were not enough, it had occurred to him that he might add the much longed-for hundred pounds to the benefit-fund by a little jeu d'esprit in form of a history of the trip, to be published with illustrations from the artists; and his notion was to write it in the character of Mrs. Gamp. It was to be, in the phraseology of that notorious woman, a new "Piljians Projiss;" and was to bear upon the title page its description as an Account of a late Expedition into the North, for an Amateur Theatrical Benefit, written by Mrs. Gamp (who was an eye-witness), Inscribed to Mrs. Harris, Edited by Charles Dickens, and published, with illustrations on wood by so and so, in aid of the Benefit-fund. "What do you think of this idea for it? The argument would be, that Mrs. Gamp, being on the eve of an excursion to Margate as a relief from her professional fatigues, comes to the knowledge of the intended excursion of our party; hears that several of the ladies concerned are in an interesting situation; and decides to accompany the party unbeknown, in a second-class carriage—'in case.' There, she finds a gentleman from the Strand in a checked suit, who is going down with the wigs"—the theatrical hair-dresser employed on these occasions, Mr. Wilson, had eccentric points of[375] character that were a fund of infinite mirth to Dickens—"and to his politeness Mrs. Gamp is indebted for much support and countenance during the excursion. She will describe the whole thing in her own manner: sitting, in each place of performance, in the orchestra, next the gentleman who plays the kettle-drums. She gives her critical opinion of Ben Jonson as a literary character, and refers to the different members of the party, in the course of her description of the trip: having always an invincible animosity towards Jerrold, for Caudle reasons. She addresses herself, generally, to Mrs. Harris, to whom the book is dedicated,—but is discursive. Amount of matter, half a sheet of Dombey: may be a page or so more, but not less." Alas! it never arrived at even that small size, but perished prematurely, as I feared it would, from failure of the artists to furnish needful nourishment. Of course it could not live alone. Without suitable illustration it must have lost its point and pleasantry. "Mac will make a little garland of the ladies for the title-page. Egg and Stone will themselves originate something fanciful, and I will settle with Cruikshank and Leech. I have no doubt the little thing will be droll and attractive." So it certainly would have been, if the Thanes of art had not fallen from him; but on their desertion it had to be abandoned after the first few pages were written. They were placed at my disposal then; and, though the little jest has lost much of its flavour now, I cannot find it in my heart to omit them here. There are so many friends of Mrs. Gamp who will rejoice at this unexpected visit from her![376]
On Monday, July 26th, we performed in Manchester, and on Wednesday, July 28th, in Liverpool. The first night featured the comedies A Good Night's Rest and Turning the Tables, while the second night had Comfortable Lodgings, or Paris in 1750; The earnings for the first night were £440 12s, and for the second, £463 8s. 6d. Even though the married members of the cast who brought their wives covered that part of the expenses, and everyone who acted contributed three pounds ten to the benefit fund for hotel costs, the overall expenses were so high that the profit ended up being just four hundred guineas. Although this was a good amount for the purpose, expectations were set at five hundred. So, there was a slight feeling of disappointment when, not long after we returned and Dickens went back to Broadstairs, I received a surprising letter from him. On August 3rd, he wrote: "All is well. The children" (who had been dealing with whooping cough) "are doing much better. Business from the recent success is worse than ever." What startled me came the very next day. As if his work wasn’t enough, he decided he could add a much-desired hundred pounds to the benefit fund with a little piece about the trip. He wanted to publish it with illustrations by the artists, writing it in the character of Mrs. Gamp. It was to be a new "Piljians Projiss" in her infamous style, titled as an Account of a recent Expedition into the North, for an Amateur Theatrical Benefit, written by Mrs. Gamp (who was an eyewitness), Inscribed to Mrs. Harris, Edited by Charles Dickens, and published with woodcut illustrations by so and so, in aid of the Benefit fund. "What do you think of this idea? The story would be about Mrs. Gamp, who, just before her trip to Margate for a break from her work, learns about our group’s upcoming trip. She hears that some of the ladies are in a delicate situation and decides to secretly join in a second-class carriage—'just in case.' Once there, she encounters a gentleman in a checked suit from the Strand, who’s going down with the wigs"—the theatrical hairdresser, Mr. Wilson, had quirks that were a continuous source of amusement for Dickens—"and thanks to his politeness, Mrs. Gamp gets a lot of support and encouragement during the trip. She’ll describe everything in her own style: sitting in each performance location, next to the guy who plays the kettle drums. She’ll give her thoughts on Ben Jonson as a writer and will mention various group members, all while holding a grudge against Jerrold for personal reasons. She generally addresses her comments to Mrs. Harris, to whom the book is dedicated—but she’s all over the place. Amount of content, about half a sheet of Dombey: maybe a page or so more, but not less." Unfortunately, it never even reached that small length but fizzled out early, as I feared, due to the artists failing to provide necessary illustrations. Of course, it couldn’t stand on its own. Without proper illustrations, it would have lost its charm and humor. "Mac will create a little garland of the ladies for the title page. Egg and Stone will come up with something creative, and I’ll work things out with Cruikshank and Leech. I’m sure it’ll be funny and appealing." And it definitely would have been, if the great artists hadn’t left him; but after their departure, it had to be dropped after just a few pages were written. Those pages were then offered to me, and although the little joke has lost much of its magic now, I can’t bring myself to leave them out. There are so many of Mrs. Gamp's friends who will be thrilled by this unexpected appearance from her!
"I. MRS. GAMP'S ACCOUNT OF HER CONNEXION WITH THIS AFFAIR.
"Which Mrs. Harris's own words to me, was these: 'Sairey Gamp,' she says, 'why not go to Margate? Srimps,' says that dear creetur, 'is to your liking, Sairey; why not go to Margate for a week, bring your constitootion up with srimps, and come back to them loving arts as knows and wallies of you, blooming? Sairey,' Mrs. Harris says, 'you are but poorly. Don't denige it, Mrs. Gamp, for books is in your looks. You must have rest. Your mind,' she says, 'is too strong for you; it gets you down and treads upon you, Sairey. It is useless to disguige the fact—the blade is a wearing out the sheets.' 'Mrs. Harris,' I says to her, 'I could not undertake to say, and I will not deceive you ma'am, that I am the woman I could wish to be. The time of worrit as I had with Mrs. Colliber, the baker's lady, which was so bad in her mind with her first, that she would not so much as look at bottled stout, and kept to gruel through the month, has agued me, Mrs. Harris. But ma'am,' I says to her, 'talk not of Margate, for if I do go anywheres, it is elsewheres and not there.' 'Sairey,' says Mrs. Harris, solemn, 'whence this mystery? If I have ever deceived the hardest-working, soberest, and best of women, which her name is well beknown is S. Gamp Midwife Kingsgate Street High Holborn, mention it. If not,' says Mrs. Harris, with the tears a standing in her eyes, 'reweal your intentions.' 'Yes, Mrs. Harris,' I says, 'I will. Well I knows you Mrs. Harris; well you knows me; well we both knows wot the characters of one another is. Mrs.[377] Harris then,' I says, 'I have heerd as there is a expedition going down to Manjestir and Liverspool, a play-acting. If I goes anywheres for change, it is along with that.' Mrs. Harris clasps her hands, and drops into a chair, as if her time was come—which I know'd it couldn't be, by rights, for six weeks odd. 'And have I lived to hear,' she says, 'of Sairey Gamp, as always kept hersef respectable, in company with play-actors!' 'Mrs. Harris,' I says to her, 'be not alarmed—not reg'lar play-actors—hammertoors.' 'Thank Evans!' says Mrs. Harris, and bustiges into a flood of tears.
"Mrs. Harris said to me, 'Sairey Gamp, why not go to Margate? Shrimp is your favorite, Sairey; why not take a week at Margate, enjoy some shrimp, and come back refreshed to us fond folks who love you? Sairey,' Mrs. Harris says, 'you look unwell. Don't deny it, Mrs. Gamp, it shows in your face. You need a break. Your mind,' she says, 'is too active for you; it's wearing you down, Sairey. It’s pointless to hide the truth—you're running yourself ragged.' 'Mrs. Harris,' I replied, 'I can’t honestly say that I'm the person I wish I could be. The stress I had with Mrs. Colliber, the baker's wife, who was so anxious during her first pregnancy that she wouldn’t even look at bottled stout, and stuck to gruel for a whole month, has taken a toll on me, Mrs. Harris. But ma'am,' I said, 'don’t talk about Margate, because if I go anywhere, it will be somewhere else, not there.' 'Sairey,' Mrs. Harris said seriously, 'where's this coming from? If I've ever deceived the hardest-working, most sensible, and best of women, known as S. Gamp, Midwife of Kingsgate Street, High Holborn, you can say so. If not,' said Mrs. Harris, tears in her eyes, 'please reveal your plans.' 'Yes, Mrs. Harris,' I said, 'I will. Well, you know me, Mrs. Harris; we both know each other well. Mrs. Harris,' I said, 'I've heard there's a trip going to Manchester and Liverpool for a play. If I go anywhere for a change, it will be with that group.' Mrs. Harris clasped her hands and sat down like she was about to faint—which I knew couldn’t be true for at least six weeks. 'And I've lived to hear,' she said, 'of Sairey Gamp, who always kept herself respectable, associating with actors!' 'Mrs. Harris,' I reassured her, 'don't be alarmed—not the regular actors—just amateurs.' 'Thank Evans!' said Mrs. Harris, bursting into tears."
"When the sweet creetur had compoged hersef (which a sip of brandy and water warm, and sugared pleasant, with a little nutmeg did it), I proceeds in these words. 'Mrs. Harris, I am told as these hammertoors are litter'ry and artistickle.' 'Sairey,' says that best of wimmin, with a shiver and a slight relasp, 'go on, it might be worse.' 'I likewise hears,' I says to her, 'that they're agoin play-acting, for the benefit of two litter'ry men; one as has had his wrongs a long time ago, and has got his rights at last, and one as has made a many people merry in his time, but is very dull and sick and lonely his own sef, indeed.' 'Sairey,' says Mrs. Harris, 'you're an Inglish woman, and that's no business of you'rn.'
"When the sweet creature had composed herself (a sip of warm brandy and water, sweetened and with a little nutmeg did the trick), I continued with these words. 'Mrs. Harris, I’ve been told that these performers are literary and artistic.' 'Sairey,' says that wonderful woman, with a shiver and a slight relapse, 'go on, it could be worse.' 'I also hear,' I said to her, 'that they're going to do a play for the benefit of two literary men; one who suffered long ago and finally got his rights, and another who has made many people happy in his time but is very dull, sick, and lonely himself, indeed.' 'Sairey,' says Mrs. Harris, 'you're an English woman, and that's none of your business.'"
"'No, Mrs. Harris,' I says, 'that's very true; I hope I knows my dooty and my country. But,' I says, 'I am informed as there is Ladies in this party, and that half a dozen of 'em, if not more, is in various stages of a interesting state. Mrs. Harris, you and me well knows what Ingeins often does. If I accompanies[378] this expedition, unbeknown and second cladge, may I not combine my calling with change of air, and prove a service to my feller creeturs?' 'Sairey,' was Mrs. Harris's reply, 'you was born to be a blessing to your sex, and bring 'em through it. Good go with you! But keep your distance till called in, Lord bless you Mrs. Gamp; for people is known by the company they keeps, and litterary and artistickle society might be the ruin of you before you was aware, with your best customers, both sick and monthly, if they took a pride in themselves.'
"'No, Mrs. Harris,' I said, 'that's very true; I hope I know my duty and my country. But,' I continued, 'I've heard that there are ladies in this group, and that half a dozen of them, if not more, are in various stages of an interesting condition. Mrs. Harris, you and I both know what trouble can come from that. If I join this expedition, without anyone knowing, may I not combine my work with a change of scenery and be of service to my fellow creatures?' 'Sairey,' Mrs. Harris replied, 'you were born to be a blessing to your gender and help them through it. Good luck to you! But keep your distance until you're called in, God bless you, Mrs. Gamp; because people are judged by the company they keep, and literary and artistic society could ruin you before you even realize it, with your best clients, both ill and expectant, if they took too much pride in themselves.'"
"II. MRS. GAMP IS DESCRIPTIVE.
"The number of the cab had a seven in it I think, and a ought I know—and if this should meet his eye (which it was a black 'un, new done, that he saw with; the other was tied up), I give him warning that he'd better take that umbereller and patten to the Hackney-coach Office before he repents it. He was a young man in a weskit with sleeves to it and strings behind, and needn't flatter himsef with a suppogition of escape, as I gave this description of him to the Police the moment I found he had drove off with my property; and if he thinks there an't laws enough he's much mistook—I tell him that:
"The cab number had a seven in it, I think, and a zero for sure—and if this happens to reach his attention (which it was a new black one he saw; the other was tied up), I'm warning him that he better take that umbrella and shoes to the Hackney Coach Office before he regrets it. He was a young guy in a waistcoat with sleeves and strings in the back, and he shouldn't kid himself into thinking he can get away with this, since I gave this description to the police as soon as I realized he drove off with my stuff; and if he thinks there aren’t enough laws, he's sadly mistaken—I tell him that:
"I do assure you, Mrs. Harris, when I stood in the railways office that morning with my bundle on my arm and one patten in my hand, you might have knocked me down with a feather, far less porkmangers which was a lumping against me, continual and sewere all round. I was drove about like a brute animal and almost worritted into fits, when a gentleman with a[379] large shirt-collar and a hook nose, and a eye like one of Mr. Sweedlepipes's hawks, and long locks of hair, and wiskers that I wouldn't have no lady as I was engaged to meet suddenly a turning round a corner, for any sum of money you could offer me, says, laughing, 'Halloa, Mrs. Gamp, what are you up to!' I didn't know him from a man (except by his clothes); but I says faintly, 'If you're a Christian man, show me where to get a second-cladge ticket for Manjester, and have me put in a carriage, or I shall drop!' Which he kindly did, in a cheerful kind of a way, skipping about in the strangest manner as ever I see, making all kinds of actions, and looking and vinking at me from under the brim of his hat (which was a good deal turned up), to that extent, that I should have thought he meant something but for being so flurried as not to have no thoughts at all until I was put in a carriage along with a individgle—the politest as ever I see—in a shepherd's plaid suit with a long gold watch-guard hanging round his neck, and his hand a trembling through nervousness worse than a aspian leaf.
"I assure you, Mrs. Harris, when I stood in the railway office that morning with my bag under my arm and one shoe in my hand, you could've knocked me over with a feather, let alone the complaints that were piling up against me, constant and severe all around. I was being pushed around like an animal and nearly driven to tears, when a gentleman with a large shirt collar and a hooked nose, an eye like one of Mr. Sweedlepipes's hawks, and long hair, along with whiskers that would’ve scared any lady I was meeting, suddenly turned the corner. For any amount of money, I wouldn’t have guessed who he was, but I said faintly, 'If you’re a Christian man, please show me where to get a second-class ticket for Manchester and help me get into a carriage, or I’ll collapse!' Which he kindly did, in a cheerful way, bouncing around in the strangest manner I’d ever seen, making all sorts of gestures, and glancing at me from under the brim of his hat (which was turned up quite a bit), to the point that I would’ve thought he meant something if I hadn’t been so flustered that I couldn’t think at all until I was placed in a carriage with another person—the politest man I’d ever seen—dressed in a plaid suit with a long gold watch chain hanging around his neck, and his hand trembling from nerves worse than an aspen leaf."
"'I'm wery appy, ma'am,' he says—the politest vice as ever I heerd!—'to go down with a lady belonging to our party.'
"'I'm very happy, ma'am,' he says—the politest guy I've ever heard!—'to go down with a lady from our group.'"
"'Our party, sir!' I says.
"'Our party, sir!' I say."
"'Yes, m'am,' he says, 'I'm Mr. Wilson. I'm going down with the wigs.'
"'Yes, ma'am,' he says, 'I'm Mr. Wilson. I'm heading down with the wigs.'"
"Mrs. Harris, wen he said he was agoing down with the wigs, such was my state of confugion and worrit that I thought he must be connected with the Government in some ways or another, but directly moment he explains himsef, for he says:[380]
"Mrs. Harris, when he said he was going to take care of the wigs, I was so confused and worried that I thought he must have some connection to the Government in some way or another, but the moment he explains himself, because he says:[380]
"'There's not a theatre in London worth mentioning that I don't attend punctually. There's five-and-twenty wigs in these boxes, ma'am,' he says, a pinting towards a heap of luggage, 'as was worn at the Queen's Fancy Ball. There's a black wig, ma'am,' he says, 'as was worn by Garrick; there's a red one, ma'am,' he says, 'as was worn by Kean; there's a brown one, ma'am,' he says, 'as was worn by Kemble; there's a yellow one, ma'am,' he says, 'as was made for Cooke; there's a grey one, ma'am,' he says, 'as I measured Mr. Young for, mysef; and there's a white one, ma'am, that Mr. Macready went mad in. There's a flaxen one as was got up express for Jenny Lind the night she came out at the Italian Opera. It was very much applauded was that wig, ma'am, through the evening. It had a great reception. The audience broke out, the moment they see it.'
"There's not a theater in London worth mentioning that I don't attend on time. There are twenty-five wigs in these boxes, ma'am," he says, pointing towards a pile of luggage, "that were worn at the Queen's Fancy Ball. There's a black wig, ma'am," he says, "that was worn by Garrick; there's a red one, ma'am," he says, "that was worn by Kean; there's a brown one, ma'am," he says, "that was worn by Kemble; there's a yellow one, ma'am," he says, "that was made for Cooke; there's a grey one, ma'am," he says, "that I measured Mr. Young for myself; and there's a white one, ma'am, that Mr. Macready went mad in. There's a flaxen one that was put together especially for Jenny Lind the night she debuted at the Italian Opera. That wig was very much applauded throughout the evening, ma'am. It received a great response. The audience erupted the moment they saw it."
"'Are you in Mr. Sweedlepipes's line, sir?' I says.
"'Are you in Mr. Sweedlepipes's line of work, sir?' I said.
"'Which is that, ma'am?' he says—the softest and genteelest vice I ever heerd, I do declare, Mrs. Harris!
"'Which is that, ma'am?' he says—the softest and most refined vice I’ve ever heard, I swear, Mrs. Harris!
"'Hair-dressing,' I says.
"‘Hairdressing,’ I said."
"'Yes, ma'am,' he replies, 'I have that honour. Do you see this, ma'am?' he says, holding up his right hand.
"'Yes, ma'am,' he replies, 'I have that honor. Do you see this, ma'am?' he says, holding up his right hand.
"'I never see such a trembling,' I says to him. And I never did!
"I've never seen someone shake like that," I said to him. And I never have!
"'All along of Her Majesty's Costume Ball, ma'am,' he says. 'The excitement did it. Two hundred and fifty-seven ladies of the first rank and fashion had their heads got up on that occasion by this hand, and my t'other one. I was at it eight-and-forty hours on my feet, ma'am, without rest. It was a Powder ball, ma'am. We have a Powder piece at Liverpool. Have[381] I not the pleasure,' he says, looking at me curious, 'of addressing Mrs. Gamp?'
"'All because of Her Majesty's Costume Ball, ma'am,' he says. 'The excitement really got to me. Two hundred and fifty-seven high-ranking ladies came to me for their hairstyles for that event, and I worked on them with my other hand. I was on my feet for forty-eight hours straight, ma'am, without a break. It was a Powder ball, ma'am. We have a Powder event in Liverpool. Have[381] I not had the pleasure,' he says, looking at me curiously, 'of speaking to Mrs. Gamp?'
"'Gamp I am, sir,' I replies. 'Both by name and natur.'
"'Gamp I am, sir,' I reply. 'Both by name and nature.'"
"'Would you like to see your beeograffer's moustache and wiskers, ma'am?' he says. 'I've got 'em in this box.'
"'Would you like to see your biographer's mustache and whiskers, ma'am?' he says. 'I've got them in this box.'"
"'Drat my beeograffer, sir,' I says, 'he has given me no region to wish to know anythink about him.'
"'Darn my biographer, sir,' I said, 'he hasn't given me any reason to want to know anything about him.'"
"'Oh, Missus Gamp, I ask your parden'—I never see such a polite man, Mrs. Harris! 'P'raps,' he says, 'if you're not of the party, you don't know who it was that assisted you into this carriage!'
"'Oh, Mrs. Gamp, I apologize'—I've never met such a polite guy, Mrs. Harris! 'Maybe,' he says, 'if you're not part of the group, you don't know who helped you into this carriage!'"
"'No, Sir,' I says, 'I don't, indeed.'
"'No, Sir,' I said, 'I really don't.'"
"'Why, ma'am,' he says, a wisperin', 'that was George, ma'am.'
"'Why, ma'am,' he says, whispering, 'that was George, ma'am.'
"'What George, sir? I don't know no George,' says I.
"'What George, sir? I don't know any George,' I said."
"'The great George, ma'am,' says he. 'The Crookshanks.'
"'The great George, ma'am,' he says. 'The Crookshanks.'"
"If you'll believe me, Mrs. Harris, I turns my head, and see the wery man a making picturs of me on his thumb nail, at the winder! while another of 'em—a tall, slim, melancolly gent, with dark hair and a bage vice—looks over his shoulder, with his head o' one side as if he understood the subject, and cooly says, 'I've draw'd her several times—in Punch,' he says too! The owdacious wretch!
"If you believe me, Mrs. Harris, I turned my head and saw the very man making pictures of me on his thumbnail at the window! While another one of them—a tall, slim, melancholy guy with dark hair and a beige waistcoat—leans over his shoulder, tilting his head as if he understood the subject, and casually says, 'I’ve drawn her several times—in Punch,' he adds too! The audacious wretch!"
"'Which I never touches, Mr. Wilson,' I remarks out loud—I couldn't have helped it, Mrs. Harris, if you had took my life for it!—'which I never touches, Mr. Wilson, on account of the lemon!'[382]
"'I never touch it, Mr. Wilson,' I say out loud—I couldn't help it, Mrs. Harris, even if you took my life for it!—'I never touch it, Mr. Wilson, because of the lemon!'[382]
"'Hush!' says Mr. Wilson. 'There he is!'
"'Hush!' says Mr. Wilson. 'There he is!'"
"I only see a fat gentleman with curly black hair and a merry face, a standing on the platform rubbing his two hands over one another, as if he was washing of 'em, and shaking his head and shoulders wery much; and I was a wondering wot Mr. Wilson meant, wen he says, 'There's Dougladge, Mrs. Gamp!' he says. 'There's him as wrote the life of Mrs. Caudle!'
"I only see a chubby guy with curly black hair and a cheerful face, standing on the platform rubbing his hands together like he’s washing them, and shaking his head and shoulders a lot; and I was wondering what Mr. Wilson meant when he said, 'There’s Dougladge, Mrs. Gamp!' he said. 'That’s the guy who wrote the life of Mrs. Caudle!'"
"Mrs. Harris, wen I see that little willain bodily before me, it give me such a turn that I was all in a tremble. If I hadn't lost my umbereller in the cab, I must have done him a injury with it! Oh the bragian little traitor! right among the ladies, Mrs. Harris; looking his wickedest and deceitfullest of eyes while he was a talking to 'em; laughing at his own jokes as loud as you please; holding his hat in one hand to cool his-sef, and tossing back his iron-grey mop of a head of hair with the other, as if it was so much shavings—there, Mrs. Harris, I see him, getting encouragement from the pretty delooded creeturs, which never know'd that sweet saint, Mrs. C, as I did, and being treated with as much confidence as if he'd never wiolated none of the domestic ties, and never showed up nothing! Oh the aggrawation of that Dougladge! Mrs. Harris, if I hadn't apologiged to Mr. Wilson, and put a little bottle to my lips which was in my pocket for the journey, and which it is very rare indeed I have about me, I could not have abared the sight of him—there, Mrs. Harris! I could not!—I must have tore him, or have give way and fainted.
"Mrs. Harris, when I saw that little villain standing right in front of me, it gave me such a shock that I was shaking all over. If I hadn't lost my umbrella in the cab, I would have hit him with it! Oh, the bragging little traitor! Right there among the ladies, Mrs. Harris; looking at them with his most wicked and deceitful eyes while he was talking to them; laughing at his own jokes as loud as can be; holding his hat in one hand to cool himself, and tossing back his iron-grey mop of hair with the other, as if it was just scraps—there, Mrs. Harris, I saw him, getting encouragement from those pretty deluded creatures, who never knew that sweet saint, Mrs. C, like I did, and being treated with as much trust as if he had never violated any domestic ties and never showed his true self! Oh, the aggravation of that Dougladge! Mrs. Harris, if I hadn't apologized to Mr. Wilson, and taken a little bottle to my lips that I had in my pocket for the journey, which I very rarely carry with me, I couldn't have stood the sight of him—there, Mrs. Harris! I couldn't!—I would have either torn into him or fainted."
"While the bell was a ringing, and the luggage of the hammertoors in great confugion—all a litter'ry[383] indeed—was handled up, Mr. Wilson demeens his-sef politer than ever. 'That,' he says, 'Mrs. Gamp,' a pinting to a officer-looking gentleman, that a lady with a little basket was a taking care on, 'is another of our party. He's a author too—continivally going up the walley of the Muses, Mrs. Gamp. There,' he says, alluding to a fine looking, portly gentleman, with a face like a amiable full moon, and a short mild gent, with a pleasant smile, 'is two more of our artists, Mrs G, well beknowed at the Royal Academy, as sure as stones is stones, and eggs is eggs. This resolute gent,' he says, 'a coming along here as is aperrently going to take the railways by storm—him with the tight legs, and his weskit very much buttoned, and his mouth very much shut, and his coat a flying open, and his heels a giving it to the platform, is a cricket and beeograffer, and our principal tragegian.' 'But who,' says I, when the bell had left off, and the train had begun to move, 'who, Mr. Wilson, is the wild gent in the prespiration, that's been a tearing up and down all this time with a great box of papers under his arm, a talking to everybody wery indistinct, and exciting of himself dreadful?' 'Why?' says Mr. Wilson, with a smile. 'Because, sir,' I says, 'he's being left behind.' 'Good God!' cries Mr. Wilson, turning pale and putting out his head, 'it's your beeograffer—the Manager—and he has got the money, Mrs. Gamp!' Hous'ever, some one chucked him into the train and we went off. At the first shreek of the whistle, Mrs. Harris, I turned white, for I had took notice of some of them dear creeturs as was the cause of my being in company, and I know'd the danger that—but Mr.[384] Wilson, which is a married man, puts his hand on mine, and says, 'Mrs. Gamp, calm yourself; it's only the Ingein.'"
"While the bell was ringing and the luggage of the passengers was in great confusion—quite a mess, really—Mr. Wilson was acting more polite than ever. 'That,' he said, pointing to a officer-looking gentleman being looked after by a woman with a small basket, 'is another one of our group. He’s an author too—constantly going up the valley of the Muses, Mrs. Gamp. Over there,' he said, referring to a well-built, portly gentleman with a face like a friendly full moon, and a short mild man with a pleasant smile, 'are two more of our artists, Mrs. G, well-known at the Royal Academy, as sure as stones are stones and eggs are eggs. This determined gentleman,' he said, 'who’s obviously going to take the railways by storm—him with the fitted legs, his waistcoat very much buttoned, mouth very much closed, coat flying open, and heels pounding the platform—is a cricket and biographer, and our main tragedian.' 'But who,' I asked, when the bell stopped and the train started moving, 'who, Mr. Wilson, is the wild guy in a sweat, who’s been running back and forth with a big box of papers under his arm, talking to everyone very unclearly and getting himself all worked up?' 'Why?' Mr. Wilson replied with a smile. 'Because, sir,' I said, 'he’s going to be left behind.' 'Good God!' exclaimed Mr. Wilson, turning pale and leaning out, 'it’s your biographer—the Manager—and he has the money, Mrs. Gamp!' Nevertheless, someone shoved him onto the train, and we took off. At the first shriek of the whistle, Mrs. Harris, I turned white, because I had noticed some of those dear creatures that were the reason I was in this company, and I knew the danger that—but Mr. Wilson, who is a married man, put his hand on mine and said, 'Mrs. Gamp, calm yourself; it’s just the engine.'"
Of those of the party with whom these humorous liberties were taken there are only two now living to complain of their friendly caricaturist, and Mr. Cruikshank will perhaps join me in a frank forgiveness not the less heartily for the kind words about himself that reached me from Broadstairs not many days after Mrs. Gamp. "At Canterbury yesterday" (2nd of September) "I bought George Cruikshank's Bottle. I think it very powerful indeed: the two last plates most admirable, except that the boy and girl in the very last are too young, and the girl more like a circus-phenomenon than that no-phenomenon she is intended to represent. I question, however, whether anybody else living could have done it so well. There is a woman in the last plate but one, garrulous about the murder, with a child in her arms, that is as good as Hogarth. Also, the man who is stooping down, looking at the body. The philosophy of the thing, as a great lesson, I think all wrong; because to be striking, and original too, the drinking should have begun in sorrow, or poverty, or ignorance—the three things in which, in its awful aspect, it does begin. The design would then have been a double-handed sword—but too 'radical' for good old George, I suppose."
Of the people from the party who were the subject of these humorous jabs, only two are still alive to complain about their friendly caricaturist. Mr. Cruikshank will probably join me in a sincere forgiveness that is no less heartfelt because of the kind words about him that I received from Broadstairs shortly after Mrs. Gamp. "At Canterbury yesterday" (September 2nd), "I bought George Cruikshank's Bottle. I find it very powerful indeed: the last two plates are especially remarkable, except that the boy and girl in the very last one look too young, and the girl resembles more of a circus act than the ordinary girl she represents. However, I doubt anyone else could have done it as well. There’s a woman in the second-to-last plate, chatting about the murder with a child in her arms, who is as good as Hogarth. Plus, the man who is bent down, looking at the body. The message of it, as a significant lesson, seems completely wrong to me because for it to be striking and original, the drinking should have started from sorrow, or poverty, or ignorance—those are the three things from which, in its grim reality, it really does begin. The design would then be a double-edged sword—but probably too 'radical' for dear old George, I guess."
The same letter made mention of other matters of interest. His accounts for the first half-year of Dombey were so much in excess of what had been expected from the new publishing arrangements, that from this date all embarrassments connected with money were brought[385] to a close. His future profits varied of course with his varying sales, but there was always enough, and savings were now to begin. "The profits of the half-year are brilliant. Deducting the hundred pounds a month paid six times, I have still to receive two thousand two hundred and twenty pounds, which I think is tidy. Don't you? . . . Stone is still here, and I lamed his foot by walking him seventeen miles the day before yesterday; but otherwise he flourisheth. . . . Why don't you bring down a carpet-bag-full of books, and take possession of the drawing-room all the morning? My opinion is that Goldsmith would die more easy by the seaside. Charley and Walley have been taken to school this morning in high spirits, and at London Bridge will be folded in the arms of Blimber. The Government is about to issue a Sanitary commission, and Lord John, I am right well pleased to say, has appointed Henry Austin secretary." Mr. Austin, who afterwards held the same office under the Sanitary act, had married his youngest sister Letitia; and of his two youngest brothers I may add that Alfred, also a civil-engineer, became one of the sanitary inspectors, and that Augustus was now placed in a city employment by Mr. Thomas Chapman, which after a little time he surrendered, and then found his way to America.
The same letter mentioned other interesting topics. His earnings for the first half of Dombey exceeded expectations from the new publishing deals, so from this point on, all money-related issues were resolved[385]. His future profits obviously varied with sales, but there was always enough, and savings could now start. "The profits from the half-year are amazing. After deducting the six payments of a hundred pounds each, I still have two thousand two hundred and twenty pounds to receive, which I think is great. Don't you? . . . Stone is still here, and I hurt his foot by walking him seventeen miles the day before yesterday; but he’s doing fine otherwise. . . . Why don’t you bring a bag full of books and take over the drawing-room all morning? I believe Goldsmith would feel better at the seaside. Charley and Walley went off to school in a good mood this morning, and at London Bridge they will be welcomed by Blimber. The Government is set to launch a Sanitary commission, and I’m pleased to say that Lord John has appointed Henry Austin as secretary." Mr. Austin, who later held the same position under the Sanitary act, had married his youngest sister Letitia; and I should mention that Alfred, also a civil engineer, became one of the sanitary inspectors, and Augustus was recently placed in a city job by Mr. Thomas Chapman, which he eventually gave up, and then made his way to America.
The next Broadstairs letter (5th of September) resumed the subject of Goldsmith, whose life I was then bringing nearly to completion. "Supposing your Goldsmith made a general sensation, what should you think of doing a cheap edition of his works? I have an idea that we might do some things of that sort with considerable effect. There is really no edition of the great British[386] novelists in a handy nice form, and would it not be a likely move to do it with some attractive feature that could not be given to it by the Teggs and such people? Supposing one wrote an essay on Fielding for instance, and another on Smollett, and another on Sterne, recalling how one read them as a child (no one read them younger than I, I think;) and how one gradually grew up into a different knowledge of them, and so forth—would it not be interesting to many people? I should like to know if you descry anything in this. It is one of the dim notions fluctuating within me.[144] . . . The profits, brave indeed, are four hundred pounds more than the utmost I expected. . . . The same yearnings have been mine, in reference to the Praslin business. It is pretty clear to me, for one thing, that the Duchess was one of the most uncomfortable women in the world, and that it would have been hard work for anybody to have got on with her. It is strange to see a bloody reflection of our friends Eugène Sue and Dumas in the whole melodrama. Don't you think so. . . . remembering what we often said of the canker at the root of all that Paris life? I dreamed of you, in a wild manner, all last night. . . . A sea fog here, which prevents one's seeing the low-water mark. A circus on the cliff to the right, and of course I have a box to-night! Deep slowness in the inimitable's brain. A shipwreck on[387] the Goodwin sands last Sunday, which Wally, with a hawk's eye, saw go down: for which assertion, subsequently confirmed and proved, he was horribly maltreated at the time."
The next letter from Broadstairs (September 5th) picked up on the subject of Goldsmith, whose biography I was almost done writing. "If your Goldsmith creates a big stir, what do you think about putting out a budget edition of his works? I have a feeling we could pull off something like that with great impact. There's really no edition of the major British novelists that’s in an accessible, nice format, and wouldn't it be smart to do it in a way that Teggs and similar publishers can't? What if someone wrote an essay on Fielding, for example, another on Smollett, and one on Sterne, reminiscing about how we read them as kids (I doubt anyone read them younger than I did), and how we gradually developed a different understanding of them, and so on—wouldn't that be intriguing to a lot of people? I'd like to know if you see any potential in this. It's one of those vague ideas swirling around in my mind. The profits, surprisingly, are four hundred pounds more than I ever expected. The same feelings have been mine regarding the Praslin case. It’s pretty clear to me that the Duchess was one of the most difficult women to deal with, and it would have been tough for anyone to get along with her. It's odd to see a bloody echo of our friends Eugène Sue and Dumas in the whole drama. Don’t you think so? Remembering what we often said about the rot at the core of that Parisian lifestyle? I dreamt about you in a crazy way all night. There’s a sea fog here that’s blocking the view of the low tide. There’s a circus on the cliff to the right, and of course I have a box for tonight! The inimitable’s brain is moving at a snail's pace. There was a shipwreck on the Goodwin Sands last Sunday, which Wally, with his sharp gaze, saw it go down: for which he was brutally mistreated at the time, but later it was confirmed and proven."
Devonshire-terrace meanwhile had been left by his tenant; and coming up joyfully himself to take possession, he brought for completion in his old home an important chapter of Dombey. On the way he lost his portmanteau, but "Thank God! the MS. of the chapter wasn't in it. Whenever I travel, and have anything of that valuable article, I always carry it in my pocket."[145] He had begun at this time to find difficulties in writing at Broadstairs, of which he told me on his return. "Vagrant music is getting to that height here, and is so impossible to be escaped from, that I fear Broadstairs and I must part company in time to come. Unless it pours of rain, I cannot write half-an-hour without the most excruciating organs, fiddles, bells, or glee-singers. There is a violin of the most torturing kind under the window now (time, ten in the morning) and an Italian box of music on the steps—both in full blast." He closed with a mention of improvements in the Margate theatre since his memorable last visit. In the past two years it had been managed by a son of the great comedian, Dowton, with whose name it is pleasant to connect this note. "We went to the manager's benefit on[388] Wednesday" (10th of September): "As You Like It really very well done, and a most excellent house. Mr. Dowton delivered a sensible and modest kind of speech on the occasion, setting forth his conviction that a means of instruction and entertainment possessing such a literature as the stage in England, could not pass away; and, that what inspired great minds, and delighted great men, two thousand years ago, and did the same in Shakespeare's day, must have within itself a principle of life superior to the whim and fashion of the hour. And with that, and with cheers, he retired. He really seems a most respectable man, and he has cleared out this dust-hole of a theatre into something like decency."
Devonshire Terrace had been vacated by his tenant, and he joyfully returned to take possession, bringing with him an important chapter of Dombey to finish in his old home. On the way, he lost his suitcase, but "Thank God! the manuscript of the chapter wasn’t in it. Whenever I travel and have anything that valuable, I always keep it in my pocket."[145] He had started to find it difficult to write at Broadstairs, which he mentioned when he returned. "The street performers are becoming so loud and overwhelming here that I fear I’ll have to leave Broadstairs soon. Unless it rains, I can’t write for half an hour without being interrupted by the most excruciating organs, fiddles, bells, or singers. There’s a particularly torturous violin right under my window now (it’s ten in the morning) and an Italian music box on the steps—both are cranked up to the max." He ended with a mention of the improvements at the Margate theater since his memorable last visit. Over the past two years, it had been managed by the son of the great comedian, Dowton, with whom it’s nice to connect this note. "We went to the manager's benefit on[388] Wednesday" (September 10th): "As You Like It was really well done, and a fantastic audience. Mr. Dowton gave a sensible and humble speech, expressing his belief that a means of instruction and entertainment with such rich literature as the stage in England cannot fade away; and that what inspired great minds and delighted great men two thousand years ago, and in Shakespeare's time, must possess a principle of life that transcends the trends of the moment. With that and cheers, he left the stage. He seems like a truly respectable man, and he has transformed this dusty old theater into something decent."
He was to be in London at the end of the month: but I had from him meanwhile his preface[146] for his first completed book in the popular edition (Pickwick being now issued in that form, with an illustration by Leslie); and sending me shortly after (12th of Sept.) the first few slips of the story of the Haunted Man proposed for his next Christmas book, he told me he must finish it in less than a month if it was to be done at all, Dombey having now become very importunate. This prepared me for his letter of a week's later date. "Have been at work all day, and am seedy in consequence. Dombey takes so much time, and requires to[389] be so carefully done, that I really begin to have serious doubts whether it is wise to go on with the Christmas book. Your kind help is invoked. What do you think? Would there be any distinctly bad effect in holding this idea over for another twelvemonth? saying nothing whatever till November; and then announcing in the Dombey that its occupation of my entire time prevents the continuance of the Christmas series until next year, when it is proposed to be renewed. There might not be anything in that but a possibility of an extra lift for the little book when it did come—eh? On the other hand, I am very loath to lose the money. And still more so to leave any gap at Christmas firesides which I ought to fill. In short I am (forgive the expression) blowed if I know what to do. I am a literary Kitely—and you ought to sympathize and help. If I had no Dombey, I could write and finish the story with the bloom on—but there's the rub. . . . Which unfamiliar quotation reminds me of a Shakspearian (put an e before the s; I like it much better) speculation of mine. What do you say to 'take arms against a sea of troubles' having been originally written 'make arms,' which is the action of swimming. It would get rid of a horrible grievance in the figure, and make it plain and apt. I think of setting up a claim to live in The House at Stratford, rent-free, on the strength of this suggestion. You are not to suppose that I am anything but disconcerted to-day, in the agitation of my soul concerning Christmas; but I have been brooding, like Dombey himself, over Dombey these two days, until I really can't afford to be depressed." To his Shakespearian suggestion I replied that it would hardly[390] give him the claim he thought of setting up, for that swimming through your troubles would not be "opposing" them. And upon the other point I had no doubt of the wisdom of delay. The result was that the Christmas story was laid aside until the following year.
He was supposed to be in London at the end of the month, but I received his preface[146] for his first finished book in the popular edition (with Pickwick now coming out in that format, featuring an illustration by Leslie). Shortly after (on September 12th), he sent me the first few pages of the story of the Haunted Man, which he planned for his next Christmas book. He mentioned that he needed to finish it in less than a month if he was going to get it done at all, as Dombey was now becoming very demanding. This prepared me for his letter a week later. "I’ve been working all day and I feel worn out because of it. Dombey takes so much time and needs to be done so carefully that I’m really starting to question if it’s smart to continue with the Christmas book. I need your kind help. What do you think? Would it be really bad to hold this idea off for another year? I’d say nothing until November and then inform the readers of Dombey that its demands on my time are preventing me from continuing the Christmas series until next year, when I plan to pick it back up. That might just give the little book an extra boost when it does come out—right? On the other hand, I really don’t want to lose out on the money. Even more, I don’t want to leave a gap at Christmas that I should fill. To sum it up, I’m (forgive the expression) completely stumped about what to do. I'm a literary Kitely—and you should understand and assist. If I didn’t have Dombey, I could write and finish the story in a flash—but there’s the catch. This unfamiliar quote brings to mind a Shakespearean (put an e before the s; I like it much better) thought of mine. What do you think about 'taking arms against a sea of troubles' originally being written as 'making arms,' which is the action of swimming? It would eliminate a terrible issue in the metaphor and make it clear and relevant. I’m thinking about claiming the right to live in The House at Stratford without paying rent based on this idea. Please don’t think that I’m not feeling a bit rattled today as I ponder my Christmas woes; I’ve been brooding over Dombey for the last two days, to the point where I can’t afford to feel down." In response to his Shakespearean idea, I told him that it wouldn’t really give him the claim he thought of because swimming through your troubles wouldn’t be the same as "opposing" them. And on the other issue, I had no doubt that delaying was wise. As a result, the Christmas story was postponed until the following year.
The year's closing incidents were his chairmanship at a meeting of the Leeds Mechanics' Society on the 1st of December, and his opening of the Glasgow Athenæum on the 28th; where, to immense assemblages in both,[147] he contrasted the obstinacy and cruelty of the Power of ignorance with the docility and gentleness of the Power of knowledge; pointed the use of popular institutes in supplementing what is learnt first in life, by the later education for its employments and equipment for its domesticities and virtues, which the grown person needs from day to day as much as the child its reading and writing; and he closed at Glasgow with allusion to a bazaar set on foot by the ladies of the city, under patronage of the Queen, for adding books to its Athenæum library. "We never tire of the friendships we form with books," he said, "and here they will possess the added charm of association[391] with their donors. Some neighbouring Glasgow widow will be mistaken for that remoter one whom Sir Roger de Coverley could not forget; Sophia's muff will be seen and loved, by another than Tom Jones, going down the High-street some winter day; and the grateful students of a library thus filled will be apt, as to the fair ones who have helped to people it, to couple them in their thoughts with Principles of the Population and Additions to the History of Europe, by an author of older date than Sheriff Alison." At which no one laughed so loudly as the Sheriff himself, who had cordially received Dickens as his guest, and stood with him on the platform.
The year's final events were his leadership at a meeting of the Leeds Mechanics' Society on December 1st and his inauguration of the Glasgow Athenæum on the 28th. In front of large crowds at both events, he compared the stubbornness and cruelty of ignorance with the kindness and gentleness of knowledge. He emphasized the importance of popular institutions in enhancing what is learned early in life through further education for practical skills and personal virtues that adults need just as much as children need to learn to read and write. He concluded his speech in Glasgow by referencing a bazaar organized by the city's women, with the Queen's support, to add books to the Athenæum library. "We never tire of the friendships we form with books," he said, "and here they will have the extra charm of connection with their donors. A nearby widow from Glasgow will remind us of the distant one that Sir Roger de Coverley could never forget; Sophia's muff will be recognized and cherished by someone other than Tom Jones as it walks down the High Street on a winter day; and the grateful students of a library filled in this way will likely think of the lovely ladies who contributed to it alongside Principles of Population and Additions to the History of Europe, written by an author from before Sheriff Alison's time." At this, no one laughed louder than the Sheriff himself, who had warmly welcomed Dickens as his guest and stood with him on the platform.
On the last day but one of the old year he wrote to me from Edinburgh. "We came over this afternoon, leaving Glasgow at one o'clock. Alison lives in style in a handsome country house out of Glasgow, and is a capital fellow, with an agreeable wife, nice little daughter, cheerful niece, all things pleasant in his household. I went over the prison and lunatic asylum with him yesterday;[148] at the Lord Provost's had gorgeous state-lunch with the Town Council; and was entertained at a great dinner-party at night. Unbounded hospitality and enthoozymoozy the order of the day, and I have never been more heartily received anywhere, or enjoyed myself more completely. The great chemist, Gregory, who spoke at the meeting, returned with us[392] to Edinburgh to-day, and gave me many new lights on the road regarding the extraordinary pains Macaulay seems for years to have taken to make himself disagreeable and disliked here. No one else, on that side, would have had the remotest chance of being unseated at the last election; and, though Gregory voted for him, I thought he seemed quite as well pleased as anybody else that he didn't come in. . . . I am sorry to report the Scott Monument a failure. It is like the spire of a Gothic church taken off and stuck in the ground." On the first day of 1848, still in Edinburgh, he wrote again: "Jeffrey, who is obliged to hold a kind of morning court in his own study during the holidays, came up yesterday in great consternation, to tell me that a person had just been to make and sign a declaration of bankruptcy; and that on looking at the signature he saw it was James Sheridan Knowles. He immediately sent after, and spoke with him; and of what passed I am eager to talk with you." The talk will bring back the main subject of this chapter, from which another kind of strolling has led me away; for its results were other amateur performances, of which the object was to benefit Knowles.
On the second-to-last day of the old year, he wrote to me from Edinburgh. "We came over this afternoon, leaving Glasgow at one o'clock. Alison lives comfortably in a beautiful country house outside Glasgow and is a great guy, with a pleasant wife, a lovely little daughter, and a cheerful niece—everything nice in his home. I toured the prison and the mental health facility with him yesterday; at the Lord Provost's, we had a lavish state lunch with the Town Council and were invited to a big dinner party at night. The hospitality was endless and enthusiastic, the vibe of the day, and I've never been more warmly welcomed anywhere or enjoyed myself more. The renowned chemist, Gregory, who spoke at the meeting, returned with us to Edinburgh today and shared many insights about the lengthy efforts Macaulay seems to have made to become unpleasant and unwelcome here. No one else on that side would have had the slightest chance of being unseated in the last election; and though Gregory voted for him, he seemed just as pleased as anyone else that he didn’t win. I regret to mention that the Scott Monument is a disappointment. It looks like the spire of a Gothic church taken off and stuck in the ground." On the first day of 1848, still in Edinburgh, he wrote again: "Jeffrey, who needs to hold a sort of morning court in his study during the holidays, came by yesterday in a panic to tell me that someone just came to make and sign a declaration of bankruptcy, and when he looked at the signature, he saw it was James Sheridan Knowles. He immediately sent someone to speak with him, and I’m eager to discuss what happened with you." This conversation will bring us back to the main topic of this chapter, from which I’ve wandered off into another kind of rambling, as its results involved other amateur efforts aimed at helping Knowles.
This was the year when a committee had been formed for the purchase and preservation of Shakespeare's house at Stratford, and the performances in question took the form of contributions to the endowment of a curatorship to be held by the author of Virginius and the Hunchback. The endowment was abandoned upon the town and council of Stratford finally (and very properly) taking charge of the house; but the sum realised was not withdrawn from the object really desired, and[393] one of the finest of dramatists profited yet more largely by it than Leigh Hunt did by the former enterprise. It may be proper to remark also, that, like Leigh Hunt, Knowles received soon after, through Lord John Russell, the same liberal pension; and that smaller claims to which attention had been similarly drawn were not forgotten, Mr. Poole, after much kind help from the Bounty Fund, being in 1850 placed on the Civil List for half the amount by the same minister and friend of letters.
This was the year a committee was created to buy and preserve Shakespeare's house in Stratford, and the performances in question served as contributions to fund a curator position that would be held by the author of Virginius and The Hunchback. The endowment was dropped after the town and council of Stratford took over the house, which was the right decision. However, the amount raised was still dedicated to the intended purpose, and[393] one of the great dramatists benefited even more from it than Leigh Hunt did from the earlier project. It should also be noted that, like Leigh Hunt, Knowles shortly received the same generous pension through Lord John Russell, and that smaller claims that had also been highlighted were not overlooked. Mr. Poole, after receiving generous support from the Bounty Fund, was placed on the Civil List for half the amount in 1850 by the same minister and supporter of the arts.
Dickens threw himself into the new scheme with all his old energy;[149] and prefatory mention may be made[394] of our difficulty in selection of a suitable play to alternate with our old Ben Jonson. The Alchemist had been such a favourite with some of us, that, before finally laying it aside, we went through two or three rehearsals, in which I recollect thinking Dickens's Sir Epicure Mammon as good as anything he had done; and now the same trouble, with the same result, arising from a vain desire to please everybody, was taken successively with Beaumont and Fletcher's Beggar's Bush, and Goldsmith's Good Natured Man, with Jerrold's characteristic drama of the Rent Day, and Bulwer's masterly comedy of Money. Choice was at last made of Shakespeare's Merry Wives, in which Lemon played Falstaff, I took again the jealous husband as in Jonson's play, and Dickens was Justice Shallow; to which was added a farce, Love, Law, and Physick, in which Dickens took the part he had acted long ago, before his days of authorship; and, besides the professional actresses engaged, we had for our Dame Quickly the lady to whom the world owes incomparably the best Concordance to Shakespeare that has ever been published, Mrs. Cowden Clarke. The success was undoubtedly very great. At Manchester, Liverpool, and Edinburgh there were single representations; but Birmingham and Glasgow had each two nights, and two were given at the Haymarket, on one of which the Queen and Prince were present. The gross receipts from the nine performances, before the necessary large deductions for London and local charges, were two thousand five hundred and fifty-one pounds and eightpence.[150] The first[395] representation was in London on the 15th of April, the last in Glasgow on the 20th of July, and everywhere Dickens was the leading figure. In the enjoyment as in the labour he was first. His animal spirits, unresting and supreme, were the attraction of rehearsal at morning, and of the stage at night. At the quiet early dinner, and the more jovial unrestrained supper, where all engaged were assembled daily, his was the brightest face, the lightest step, the pleasantest word. There seemed to be no rest needed for that wonderful vitality.
Dickens threw himself into the new project with all his usual energy; and we faced the challenge of choosing a suitable play to pair with our classic Ben Jonson. The *Alchemist* had been such a favorite among us that, before we finally set it aside, we held a couple of rehearsals, where I remember thinking Dickens's Sir Epicure Mammon was as good as anything he had done. The same dilemma arose again, with the same outcome, driven by a futile desire to please everyone. This time, we considered Beaumont and Fletcher's *Beggar's Bush*, Goldsmith's *The Good-Natured Man*, Jerrold's characteristic drama *The Rent Day*, and Bulwer's brilliant comedy *Money*. We eventually settled on Shakespeare's *The Merry Wives of Windsor*, in which Lemon played Falstaff, I reprised the jealous husband role from Jonson's play, and Dickens took on Justice Shallow. We also included a farce, *Love, Law, and Physick*, where Dickens played a role he had taken long ago, before he became a writer. In addition to the professional actresses we hired, our Dame Quickly was played by the remarkable Mrs. Cowden Clarke, who has given the world the best *Concordance* to Shakespeare ever published. The success was definitely significant. In Manchester, Liverpool, and Edinburgh, we had single performances; however, Birmingham and Glasgow each had two nights, and we put on two shows at the Haymarket, one of which was attended by the Queen and Prince. The total gross receipts from the nine performances, before the necessary large deductions for London and local expenses, amounted to two thousand five hundred fifty-one pounds and eight pence. The first performance was in London on April 15th, and the last was in Glasgow on July 20th, with Dickens being the central figure everywhere. In both enjoyment and effort, he was at the forefront. His vibrant energy, relentless and exceptional, drew people to the rehearsals in the morning and to the stage at night. At the quiet early dinner and the more lively relaxed supper where everyone gathered daily, he had the brightest smile, the lightest footsteps, and the most delightful conversation. It seemed like he didn’t need a break from that incredible vitality.
My allusion to the last of these splendid strollings in aid of what we believed to be the interests of men of letters, shall be as brief as I can make it. Two winters after the present, at the close of November 1850, in the great hall of Lord Lytton's old family mansion in Knebworth-park, there were three private performances by the original actors in Ben Jonson's Every Man in His Humour. All the circumstances and surroundings were very brilliant; some of the gentlemen of the county played both in the comedy and farces; our generous host was profuse of all noble encouragement; and amid the general pleasure and excitement hopes rose high. Recent experience had shown what the public interest in this kind of amusement might place within reach of its providers; and there came to be discussed the possibility of making permanent such help as had been afforded to fellow writers, by means of an endowment that should not be mere charity,[396] but should combine indeed something of both pension-list and college-lectureship, without the drawbacks of either. It was not enough considered that schemes for self-help, to be successful, require from those they are meant to benefit, not only a general assent to their desirability, but zealous and active co-operation. Without discussing now, however, what will have to be stated hereafter, it suffices to say that the enterprise was set on foot, and the "Guild of Literature and Art" originated at Knebworth. A five-act comedy was to be written by Sir Edward Lytton, and, when a certain sum of money had been obtained by public representations of it, the details of the scheme were to be drawn up, and appeal made to those whom it addressed more especially. In a very few months everything was ready, except a farce which Dickens was to have written to follow the comedy, and which unexpected cares of management and preparation were held to absolve him from. There were other reasons. "I have written the first scene," he told me (23rd March, 1851), "and it has droll points in it, more farcical points than you commonly find in farces,[151] really better. Yet I am constantly striving, for my reputation's sake, to get into it a meaning that is impossible in a farce; constantly thinking of it, therefore, against the grain; and constantly impressed with a conviction that I could never act in it myself with that wild abandonment which can alone[397] carry a farce off. Wherefore I have confessed to Bulwer Lytton and asked for absolution." There was substituted a new farce of Lemon's, to which, however, Dickens soon contributed so many jokes and so much Gampish and other fun of his own, that it came to be in effect a joint piece of authorship; and Gabblewig, which the manager took to himself, was one of those personation parts requiring five or six changes of face, voice, and gait in the course of it, from which, as we have seen, he derived all the early theatrical ambition that the elder Mathews had awakened in him. "You have no idea," he continued, "of the immensity of the work as the time advances, for the Duke even throws the whole of the audience on us, or he would get (he says) into all manner of scrapes." The Duke of Devonshire had offered his house in Piccadilly for the first representations, and in his princely way discharged all the expenses attending them. A moveable theatre was built and set up in the great drawing-room, and the library was turned into a green-room.
My mention of the last of these fantastic outings meant to support what we thought were the interests of writers will be as brief as possible. Two winters later, at the end of November 1850, in the grand hall of Lord Lytton's old family home in Knebworth Park, there were three private performances by the original cast of Ben Jonson's Every Man in His Humour. The setting was quite impressive; some local gentlemen took part in both the comedy and the farces; our generous host was very encouraging; and amidst all the enjoyment and excitement, hopes were high. Recent experiences had shown how much public interest in this type of entertainment could offer its providers; discussions began about the possibility of creating a sustainable way to support fellow writers that wouldn't just be charity,[396] but a blend of pension support and college lecturing, without the downsides of either. It wasn't adequately considered that successful self-help initiatives need not just general agreement on their value, but also enthusiastic and active participation from those they aim to benefit. Without going into details on what will be addressed later, it's enough to say that the initiative was launched, leading to the creation of the "Guild of Literature and Art" at Knebworth. Sir Edward Lytton was to write a five-act comedy, and once a certain amount of money was raised through public performances of it, the specifics of the plan would be drafted, appealing particularly to those it concerned. In just a few months, everything was in place, except for a farce that Dickens was supposed to write to follow the comedy, which he was excused from due to unexpected management and preparation responsibilities. There were other factors as well. "I've written the first scene," he told me (23rd March, 1851), "and it has some funny moments, more comedic points than you'd normally find in farces,[151] really better. But I constantly struggle, for my reputation's sake, to infuse it with a meaning that just doesn’t fit a farce; I'm always thinking about it, going against the grain; and I feel that I could never perform in it with the wild abandon that's needed to successfully pull off a farce. So, I've admitted this to Bulwer Lytton and asked for forgiveness." A new farce by Lemon was substituted, but soon Dickens contributed many jokes and his signature comedic style, turning it into effectively a co-authored piece; and Gabblewig, a role taken by the manager, required five or six changes of appearance, voice, and mannerisms throughout, which, as we've seen, sparked the early theatrical ambition inspired by the elder Mathews. "You have no idea," he continued, "of how massive the workload becomes as time goes on, because the Duke places the entire audience responsibility on us, or he would get (he says) into all sorts of trouble." The Duke of Devonshire had offered his house in Piccadilly for the first performances and graciously covered all the related expenses. A movable theater was constructed and set up in the grand drawing room, and the library was converted into a green room.
Not so Bad as We Seem was played for the first time at Devonshire-house on the 27th of May, 1851, before the Queen and Prince and as large an audience as places could be found for; Mr. Nightingale's Diary being the name given to the farce. The success abundantly realised the expectations formed; and, after many representations at the Hanover-square Rooms in London, strolling began in the country, and was continued at intervals for considerable portions of this and the following year. From much of it, illness and occupation disabled me, and substitutes had to be found; but to this I owe the opportunity now of closing with a[398] characteristic picture of the course of the play, and of Dickens amid the incidents and accidents to which his theatrical career exposed him. The company carried with them, it should be said, the theatre constructed for Devonshire-house, as well as the admirable scenes which Stanfield, David Roberts, Thomas Grieve, Telbin, Absolon, and Louis Haghe had painted as their generous free-offerings to the comedy; of which the representations were thus rendered irrespective of theatres or their managers, and took place in the large halls or concert-rooms of the various towns and cities.
Not so Bad as We Seem was performed for the first time at Devonshire House on May 27, 1851, in front of the Queen and Prince, with a crowd as large as the venue could accommodate; Mr. Nightingale's Diary was the name given to the farce. The success more than met everyone's expectations. After many performances at the Hanover Square Rooms in London, it toured the country and continued intermittently for significant parts of this and the following year. Due to illness and other commitments, I couldn't attend many of the performances, and substitutes had to be found; however, this gave me the chance to conclude with a[398] distinctive depiction of the play's journey and of Dickens amid the various events and mishaps his theatrical career presented him. It's worth mentioning that the company took with them the theater built for Devonshire House, along with the impressive backdrops painted by Stanfield, David Roberts, Thomas Grieve, Telbin, Absolon, and Louis Haghe, who generously contributed their artwork to the comedy; this made the performances happen regardless of theaters or their managers and took place in the large halls or concert rooms of different towns and cities.
"The enclosure forgotten in my last" (Dickens writes from Sunderland on the 29th of August 1852), "was a little printed announcement which I have had distributed at the doors wherever we go, knocking Two o' Clock in the Morning bang out of the bills. Funny as it used to be, it is become impossible to get anything out of it after the scream of Mr. Nightingale's Diary. The comedy is so far improved by the reductions which your absence and other causes have imposed on us, that it acts now only two hours and twenty-five minutes, all waits included, and goes 'like wildfire,' as Mr. Tonson[152] says. We have had prodigious houses, though smaller rooms (as to their actual size) than I had hoped for. The Duke was at Derby, and no end of minor radiances. Into the room at Newcastle (where Lord Carlisle was[399] by the bye) they squeezed six hundred people, at twelve and sixpence, into a space reasonably capable of holding three hundred. Last night, in a hall built like a theatre, with pit, boxes, and gallery, we had about twelve hundred—I dare say more. They began with a round of applause when Coote's white waistcoat appeared in the orchestra, and wound up the farce with three deafening cheers. I never saw such good fellows. Stanny is their fellow-townsman; was born here; and they applauded his scene as if it were himself. But what I suffered from a dreadful anxiety that hung over me all the time, I can never describe. When we got here at noon, it appeared that the hall was a perfectly new one, and had only had the slates put upon the roof by torchlight over night. Farther, that the proprietors of some opposition rooms had declared the building to be unsafe, and that there was a panic in the town about it; people having had their money back, and being undecided whether to come or not, and all kinds of such horrors. I didn't know what to do. The horrible responsibility of risking an accident of that awful nature seemed to rest wholly upon me; for I had only to say we wouldn't act, and there would be no chance of danger. I was afraid to take Sloman into council lest the panic should infect our men. I asked W. what he thought, and he consolingly observed that his digestion was so bad that death had no terrors for him! I went and looked at the place; at the rafters, walls, pillars, and so forth; and fretted myself into a belief that they really were slight! To crown all, there was an arched iron roof without any brackets or pillars, on a new principle! The only comfort I had was in stumbling at[400] length on the builder, and finding him a plain practical north-countryman with a foot rule in his pocket. I took him aside, and asked him should we, or could we, prop up any weak part of the place: especially the dressing-rooms, which were under our stage, the weight of which must be heavy on a new floor, and dripping wet walls. He told me there wasn't a stronger building in the world; and that, to allay the apprehension, they had opened it, on Thursday night, to thousands of the working people, and induced them to sing, and beat with their feet, and make every possible trial of the vibration. Accordingly there was nothing for it but to go on. I was in such dread, however, lest a false alarm should spring up among the audience and occasion a rush, that I kept Catherine and Georgina out of the front. When the curtain went up and I saw the great sea of faces rolling up to the roof, I looked here and looked there, and thought I saw the gallery out of the perpendicular, and fancied the lights in the ceiling were not straight. Rounds of applause were perfect agony to me, I was so afraid of their effect upon the building. I was ready all night to rush on in case of an alarm—a false alarm was my main dread—and implore the people for God's sake to sit still. I had our great farce-bell rung to startle Sir Geoffrey instead of throwing down a piece of wood, which might have raised a sudden-apprehension. I had a palpitation of the heart, if any of our people stumbled up or down a stair. I am sure I never acted better, but the anxiety of my mind was so intense, and the relief at last so great, that I am half-dead to-day, and have not yet been able to eat or drink anything or to[401] stir out of my room. I shall never forget it. As to the short time we had for getting the theatre up; as to the upsetting, by a runaway pair of horses, of one of the vans at the Newcastle railway station, with all the scenery in it, every atom of which was turned over; as to the fatigue of our carpenters, who have now been up four nights, and who were lying dead asleep in the entrances last night; I say nothing, after the other gigantic nightmare, except that Sloman's splendid knowledge of his business, and the good temper and cheerfulness of all the workmen, are capital. I mean to give them a supper at Liverpool, and address them in a neat and appropriate speech. We dine at two to-day (it is now one) and go to Sheffield at four, arriving there at about ten. I had been as fresh as a daisy; walked from Nottingham to Derby, and from Newcastle here; but seem to have had my nerves crumpled up last night, and have an excruciating headache. That's all at present. I shall never be able to bear the smell of new deal and fresh mortar again as long as I live."
"The enclosure I forgot in my last" (Dickens writes from Sunderland on August 29, 1852), "was a little printed announcement I’ve been handing out at the doors wherever we go, promoting Two o' Clock in the Morning loud and clear. As funny as it used to be, it’s become impossible to get anything from it after the success of Mr. Nightingale's Diary. The comedy has improved so much due to the cuts your absence and other factors have imposed on us, that it now runs only two hours and twenty-five minutes, including all the waits, and goes ‘like wildfire,’ as Mr. Tonson[152] would say. We've had huge audiences, even though the rooms (in terms of their actual size) are smaller than I expected. The Duke was at Derby, along with a host of other notable figures. In Newcastle (where Lord Carlisle was, by the way), they crammed six hundred people into a space that could comfortably hold three hundred, charging twelve and sixpence. Last night, in a theater-like hall, complete with a pit, boxes, and a gallery, we had about twelve hundred—I’d say even more. They started with a round of applause when Coote's white waistcoat appeared in the orchestra and ended the farce with three deafening cheers. I’ve never seen such great crowds. Stanny is one of their own; he was born here, and they cheered his scene as if he were on stage himself. But the dreadful anxiety I felt throughout is something I can't describe. When we got here at noon, I found out the hall was completely new and the slates on the roof had only been put on overnight by torchlight. Additionally, the owners of some rival venues claimed the building was unsafe, causing panic in the town; people were asking for their money back and were unsure whether to come, leading to all kinds of chaos. I didn’t know what to do. The terrible responsibility of risking an accident of that magnitude felt entirely on me; if I just said we wouldn’t perform, there would be no risk. I was reluctant to involve Sloman in the discussion for fear the panic would spread to our crew. I asked W. what he thought, and he comforted me by saying his poor digestion made death no threat to him! I went to inspect the place—the rafters, walls, pillars, and so on—and became convinced they really were weak! To make matters worse, there was an arched iron roof constructed without any brackets or pillars, based on some new design! The only relief I found was when I finally met the builder, a straightforward, practical north-country guy with a foot rule in his pocket. I pulled him aside and asked him if we should or could reinforce any weak spots in the structure, especially in the dressing rooms under our stage, which must be bearing a heavy load on a new floor with dripping wet walls. He assured me there wasn’t a stronger building in the world and that, to ease concerns, they had opened it up on Thursday night to thousands of locals, getting them to sing, stomp their feet, and make every possible test of the vibrations. So there was nothing left to do but go on. I was terrified, though, that a false alarm would trigger panic among the audience and cause a stampede, so I kept Catherine and Georgina away from the front. When the curtain rose and I saw a massive sea of faces crowding to the roof, I looked around and thought I saw the gallery tilted, and imagined the lights in the ceiling weren’t straight. Applause felt torturous, as I was so worried about the building's stability. I was ready all night to rush in case of a false alarm—my greatest fear was a false alarm—and beg everyone to stay seated. I had our big farce-bell rung to surprise Sir Geoffrey instead of throwing down a piece of wood, which might have caused a sudden scare. My heart raced whenever any of our crew stumbled on the stairs. I'm sure I never acted better, but the anxiety in my mind was so intense, and the relief at the end was so great, that I'm half-dead today and haven’t been able to eat, drink, or step out of my room. I’ll never forget it. Given the short time we had to set the theatre up; considering the chaos caused by a runaway team of horses that overturned one of the vans at the Newcastle railway station, scattering all the scenery everywhere; the fatigue of our carpenters, who have now been working four nights straight, lying dead asleep in the entrances last night; I won’t mention anything else after the other monstrous nightmare, except that Sloman’s impressive knowledge of his trade and the good humor and cheerfulness of all the workers are commendable. I plan to treat them to dinner in Liverpool and give them a nicely thought-out speech. We’re dining at two today (it’s now one) and heading to Sheffield at four, arriving around ten. I was feeling as fresh as a daisy; I walked from Nottingham to Derby, and from Newcastle here; but last night seemed to have frayed my nerves, and I have a splitting headache. That’s all for now. I don’t think I’ll be able to handle the smell of fresh pine and new mortar again for the rest of my life."
Manchester and Liverpool closed the trip with enormous success at both places; and Sir Edward Lytton was present at a public dinner which was given in the former city, Dickens's brief word about it being written as he was setting foot in the train that was to bring him to London. "Bulwer spoke brilliantly at the Manchester dinner, and his earnestness and determination about the Guild was most impressive. It carried everything before it. They are now getting up annual subscriptions, and will give us a revenue to begin with. I swear I believe that people to be the greatest in the[402] world. At Liverpool I had a Round Robin on the stage after the play was over, a place being left for your signature, and as I am going to have it framed, I'll tell Green to send it to Lincoln's-inn-fields. You have no idea how good Tenniel, Topham, and Collins have been in what they had to do."
Manchester and Liverpool wrapped up the trip with great success in both cities, and Sir Edward Lytton attended a public dinner in Manchester. Dickens quickly wrote a note about it just as he was stepping onto the train that would take him back to London. "Bulwer spoke brilliantly at the Manchester dinner, and his passion and commitment to the Guild were incredibly impressive. It swept everyone away. They are organizing annual subscriptions, which will provide us with some initial funding. I honestly believe those people are the greatest in the [402] world. In Liverpool, I had a Round Robin on stage after the play ended, leaving a space for your signature, and since I'm going to frame it, I'll tell Green to send it to Lincoln's Inn Fields. You have no idea how great Tenniel, Topham, and Collins have been with their contributions."
These names, distinguished in art and letters, represent additions to the company who had joined the enterprise; and the last of them, Mr. Wilkie Collins, became, for all the rest of the life of Dickens, one of his dearest and most valued friends.
These names, well-known in art and literature, represent new members who joined the project; and the last of them, Mr. Wilkie Collins, became one of Dickens' closest and most cherished friends for the rest of his life.
CHAPTER XVIII.
SEASIDE HOLIDAYS.
1848-1851.
The portion of Dickens's life over which his adventures of strolling extended was in other respects not without interest; and this chapter will deal with some of his seaside holidays before I pass to the publication in 1848 of the story of The Haunted Man, and to the establishment in 1850 of the Periodical which had been in his thoughts for half a dozen years before, and has had foreshadowings nearly as frequent in my pages.
The time in Dickens's life when he took his long walks was also quite interesting in other ways; this chapter will cover some of his seaside vacations before I discuss the publication of The Haunted Man in 1848, and the launch of the Periodical in 1850, which he had been thinking about for about six years prior and has been hinted at often in my writing.
Among the incidents of 1848 before the holiday season came, were the dethronement of Louis Philippe,[404] and birth of the second French republic: on which I ventured to predict that a Gore-house friend of ours, and his friend, would in three days be on the scene of action. The three days passed, and I had this letter. "Mardi, Février 29, 1848. Mon Cher. Vous êtes homme de la plus grande pénétration! Ah, mon Dieu, que vous êtes absolument magnifique! Vous prévoyez presque toutes les choses qui vont arriver; et aux choses qui viennent d'arriver vous êtes merveilleusement au-fait. Ah, cher enfant, quelle idée sublime vous vous aviez à la tête quand vous prévîtes si clairement que M. le Comte Alfred d'Orsay se rendrait au pays de sa naissance! Quel magicien! Mais—c'est tout égal, mais—il n'est pas parti. Il reste à Gore-house, où, avant-hier, il y avait un grand dîner à tout le monde. Mais quel homme, quel ange, néanmoins! Mon ami, je trouve que j'aime tant la République, qu'il me faut renoncer ma langue et écrire seulement le langage de la République de France—langage des Dieux et des Anges—langage, en un mot, des Français! Hier au soir je rencontrai à l'Athenæum Monsieur Mack Leese, qui me dit que MM. les Commissionnaires des Beaux Arts lui avaient écrit, par leur secrétaire, un billet de remerciements à propos de son tableau dans la Chambre des Députés, et qu'ils lui avaient prié de faire l'autre tableau en fresque, dont on y a besoin. Ce qu'il a promis. Voici des nouvelles pour les champs de Lincoln's Inn! Vive la gloire de France! Vive la République! Vive le Peuple! Plus de Royauté! Plus des Bourbons! Plus de Guizot! Mort aux traîtres! Faisons couler le sang pour la liberté, la justice, la cause populaire! Jusqu'à cinq heures et demie, adieu,[405] mon brave! Recevez l'assurance de ma considération distinguée, et croyez-moi, concitoyen! votre tout dévoué, Citoyen Charles Dickens." I proved to be not quite so wrong, nevertheless, as my friend supposed.
Among the events of 1848 before the holiday season arrived, were the overthrow of Louis Philippe,[404] and the birth of the second French Republic: I dared to predict that a friend of ours from Gore-house, along with his friend, would be on the scene of action in three days. The three days went by, and I received this letter. "Tuesday, February 29, 1848. My dear, you are a person of great insight! Oh my God, you are absolutely magnificent! You foresee almost everything that is about to happen, and regarding things that have just happened, you are wonderfully informed. Oh, dear child, what a brilliant idea you had when you clearly predicted that Mr. Count Alfred d'Orsay would return to his birthplace! What a magician! But—regardless—he hasn't left. He remains at Gore-house, where the day before yesterday, there was a grand dinner for everyone. But what a man, what an angel he is! My buddy, I find that I love the Republic so much that I must abandon my language and write only in the language of the Republic of France—the language of Gods and Angels—the language, in short, of the French! Last night, I met at the Athenæum Mr. Mack Leese, who told me that the Fine Arts Commissioners had written him, through their secretary, a thank-you note regarding his painting in the Chamber of Deputies, and asked him to create the other painting in fresco, which is needed there. He has promised to do so. Here’s news for the fields of Lincoln's Inn! Long live the glory of France! Long live the Republic! Long live the People! No more Monarchy! No more Bourbons! No more Guizot! Death to the traitors! Let’s spill blood for freedom, justice, and the people's cause! Until five-thirty, farewell,[405] my brave friend! Please accept my distinguished regards, and believe me, fellow citizen! your devoted friend, Citizen Charles Dickens." I turned out to be not as wrong as my friend thought.
Somewhat earlier than usual this summer, on the close of the Shakespeare-house performances, he tried Broadstairs once more, having no important writing in hand: but in the brief interval before leaving he saw a thing of celebrity in those days, the Chinese Junk; and I had all the details in so good a description that I could not resist the temptation of using some parts of it at the time. "Drive down to the Blackwall railway," he wrote to me, "and for a matter of eighteen-pence you are at the Chinese Empire in no time. In half a score of minutes, the tiles and chimney-pots, backs of squalid houses, frowsy pieces of waste ground, narrow courts and streets, swamps, ditches, masts of ships, gardens of dockweed, and unwholesome little bowers of scarlet beans, whirl away in a flying dream, and nothing is left but China. How the flowery region ever came into this latitude and longitude is the first thing one asks; and it is not certainly the least of the marvel. As Aladdin's palace was transported hither and thither by the rubbing of a lamp, so the crew of Chinamen aboard the Keying devoutly believed that their good ship would turn up, quite safe, at the desired port, if they only tied red rags enough upon the mast, rudder, and cable. Somehow they did not succeed. Perhaps they ran short of rag; at any rate they hadn't enough on board to keep them above water; and to the bottom they would undoubtedly have gone[406] but for the skill and coolness of a dozen English sailors, who brought them over the ocean in safety. Well, if there be any one thing in the world that this extraordinary craft is not at all like, that thing is a ship of any kind. So narrow, so long, so grotesque; so low in the middle, so high at each end, like a China pen-tray; with no rigging, with nowhere to go to aloft; with mats for sails, great warped cigars for masts, gaudy dragons and sea-monsters disporting themselves from stem to stern, and on the stern a gigantic cock of impossible aspect, defying the world (as well he may) to produce his equal,—it would look more at home at the top of a public building, or at the top of a mountain, or in an avenue of trees, or down in a mine, than afloat on the water. As for the Chinese lounging on the deck, the most extravagant imagination would never dare to suppose them to be mariners. Imagine a ship's crew, without a profile among them, in gauze pinafores and plaited hair; wearing stiff clogs a quarter of a foot thick in the sole; and lying at night in little scented boxes, like backgammon men or chess-pieces, or mother-of-pearl counters! But by Jove! even this is nothing to your surprise when you go down into the cabin. There you get into a torture of perplexity. As, what became of all those lanterns hanging to the roof when the Junk was out at sea? Whether they dangled there, banging and beating against each other, like so many jesters' baubles? Whether the idol Chin Tee, of the eighteen arms, enshrined in a celestial Punch's Show, in the place of honour, ever tumbled out in heavy weather? Whether the incense and the joss-stick still burnt before her, with a faint perfume[407] and a little thread of smoke, while the mighty waves were roaring all around? Whether that preposterous tissue-paper umbrella in the corner was always spread, as being a convenient maritime instrument for walking about the decks with in a storm? Whether all the cool and shiny little chairs and tables were continually sliding about and bruising each other, and if not why not? Whether anybody on the voyage ever read those two books printed in characters like bird-cages and fly-traps? Whether the Mandarin passenger, He Sing, who had never been ten miles from home in his life before, lying sick on a bamboo couch in a private china closet of his own (where he is now perpetually writing autographs for inquisitive barbarians), ever began to doubt the potency of the Goddess of the Sea, whose counterfeit presentment, like a flowery monthly nurse, occupies the sailors' joss-house in the second gallery? Whether it is possible that the said Mandarin, or the artist of the ship, Sam Sing, Esquire, R.A. of Canton, can ever go ashore without a walking-staff of cinnamon, agreeably to the usage of their likenesses in British tea-shops? Above all, whether the hoarse old ocean could ever have been seriously in earnest with this floating toy-shop; or had merely played with it in lightness of spirit—roughly, but meaning no harm—as the bull did with another kind of china-shop on St. Patrick's day in the morning."
Somewhat earlier than usual this summer, after the performances at the Shakespeare house wrapped up, he decided to give Broadstairs another shot since he didn’t have any important writing to do. In the brief time before leaving, he saw something famous back then, the Chinese Junk; I had such a good description of it that I couldn’t resist using some parts at the time. "Drive down to the Blackwall railway," he wrote to me, "and for just eighteen-pence, you’ll be in the Chinese Empire in no time. In ten minutes, the rooftops, the backs of shabby houses, the messy bits of land, narrow alleys and streets, swamps, ditches, ship masts, dockweed gardens, and little unhealthy spots filled with scarlet beans, all whirl away in a dream, leaving only China. The first thing you wonder is how this flowery region ended up in these coordinates, and it’s definitely not the least of the marvels. Just like Aladdin's palace was whisked from place to place with the rub of a lamp, the crew of Chinamen aboard the Keying firmly believed their good ship would show up safe at the right port if they just tied enough red rags to the mast, rudder, and cable. Somehow, they didn’t succeed. Maybe they ran out of rags; either way, they didn’t have enough to keep them afloat, and they would have definitely sunk if it weren’t for the skill and calmness of a dozen English sailors who brought them safely across the ocean. Well, if there’s one thing that this extraordinary vessel is not like at all, it's a ship of any kind. It’s so narrow, so long, so bizarre; low in the middle and high at both ends, like a China pen tray; with no rigging, no place to climb up; with mats for sails, warped cigars for masts, and colorful dragons and sea monsters decorating it from stem to stern, and on the stern, a giant rooster of impossible design, challenging the world (as it rightly should) to produce its equal—it would look more at home on top of a public building, a mountain, in an avenue of trees, or deep in a mine than floating on the water. As for the Chinese lounging on the deck, you'd have to stretch your imagination to think of them as sailors. Picture a crew without a profile among them, dressed in gauzy aprons and with braided hair; wearing thick wooden clogs; and sleeping at night in little fragrant boxes, like backgammon pieces or chess pieces, or mother-of-pearl counters! But honestly, that's nothing compared to the surprise waiting for you when you go down into the cabin. There you spiral into a total confusion. What happened to all those lanterns hanging from the ceiling when the Junk was out at sea? Did they clang together like jesters' trinkets? Did the idol Chin Tee, with eighteen arms, placed in a celestial Punch's Show at the center, ever topple over in bad weather? Did the incense and joss-stick still burn before her, sending out a faint scent and a little trail of smoke while the huge waves crashed all around? Was that ridiculous tissue-paper umbrella in the corner always deployed, as a handy tool for walking around the decks during a storm? Did the shiny little chairs and tables keep sliding around and bumping into each other, and if not, why not? Did anyone on the trip ever read those two books printed in characters that looked like bird cages and fly traps? Did the Mandarin passenger, He Sing, who had never traveled more than ten miles from home before, lying sick on a bamboo couch in his own little china closet (where he is now constantly writing autographs for curious outsiders), ever start to doubt the power of the Goddess of the Sea, whose picture, like a colorful maternity nurse, fills the sailors' joss-house in the second gallery? Is it even possible for the said Mandarin, or the ship's artist, Sam Sing, Esquire, R.A. of Canton, to ever step ashore without a walking stick made of cinnamon, just like in British tea shops? Above all, did the rugged old ocean ever take this floating toy shop seriously, or did it just play with it lightly—roughly, but with no malice—like the bull did with another kind of china shop on St. Patrick's Day morning?"
The reply made on this brought back comment and sequel not less amusing. "Yes, there can be no question that this is Finality in perfection; and it is a great advantage to have the doctrine so beautifully worked out, and shut up in a corner of a dock near a fashionable[408] white-bait house for the edification of man. Thousands of years have passed away since the first junk was built on this model, and the last junk ever launched was no better for that waste and desert of time. The mimic eye painted on their prows to assist them in finding their way, has opened as wide and seen as far as any actual organ of sight in all the interval through the whole immense extent of that strange country. It has been set in the flowery head to as little purpose for thousands of years. With all their patient and ingenious but never advancing art, and with all their rich and diligent agricultural cultivation, not a new twist or curve has been given to a ball of ivory, and not a blade of experience has been grown. There is a genuine finality in that; and when one comes from behind the wooden screen that encloses the curious sight, to look again upon the river and the mighty signs on its banks of life, enterprise, and progress, the question that comes nearest is beyond doubt a home one. Whether we ever by any chance, in storms, trust to red flags; or burn joss-sticks before idols; or grope our way by the help of conventional eyes that have no sight in them; or sacrifice substantial facts for absurd forms? The ignorant crew of the Keying refused to enter on the ships' books, until 'a considerable amount of silvered-paper, tin-foil, and joss-stick' had been laid in by the owners for the purposes of their worship. And I wonder whether our seamen, let alone our bishops and deacons, ever stand out upon points of silvered-paper and tin-foil and joss-sticks. To be sure Christianity is not Chin-Teeism, and that I suppose is why we never lose sight of the[409] end in contemptible and insignificant quarrels about the means. There is enough matter for reflection aboard the Keying at any rate to last one's voyage home to England again."
The response to this brought back comments and follow-ups that were equally amusing. "Absolutely, there’s no doubt that this is perfection in finality; and it’s a great advantage to have the idea so beautifully laid out, tucked away in a corner of a dock by a trendy[408] white-bait restaurant for the enrichment of humanity. Thousands of years have gone by since the first junk was built like this, and the last junk ever launched has not improved because of that loss of time. The painted eye on their bows, intended to help them navigate, has opened just as wide and seen just as far as any real eye could in all the time that has passed through that vast and strange land. It has been set on the decorative figurehead with little purpose for countless years. Despite their patient and clever but never-progressing craft, and all their rich and diligent agricultural work, not a new twist or curve has been added to a ball of ivory, and no new knowledge has emerged. There’s a true sense of finality in that; and when one steps out from behind the wooden screen that encloses this curious sight, to look once more at the river and the grand signs of life, ambition, and progress lining its banks, the question that arises is undoubtedly a personal one. Whether we ever, in storms, rely on red flags; or burn joss-sticks before idols; or find our way using conventional eyes that see nothing; or sacrifice real facts for ridiculous forms? The unaware crew of the Keying refused to enter their names in the ship’s log until a significant amount of silvered paper, tin foil, and joss-sticks had been provided by the owners for their rituals. And I wonder if our sailors, let alone our bishops and deacons, ever stand on points of silvered paper, tin foil, and joss-sticks. Of course, Christianity isn’t Chin-Teeism, and that’s probably why we never lose sight of the[409] end in trivial and petty disputes over the means. There’s certainly enough to think about aboard the Keying to last the journey back home to England."
Other letters of the summer from Broadstairs will complete what he wrote from the same place last year on Mr. Cruikshank's efforts in the cause of temperance, and will enable me to say, what I know he wished to be remembered in his story, that there was no subject on which through his whole life he felt more strongly than this. No man advocated temperance, even as far as possible its legislative enforcement, with greater earnestness; but he made important reservations. Not thinking drunkenness to be a vice inborn, or incident to the poor more than to other people, he never would agree that the existence of a gin-shop was the alpha and omega of it. Believing it to be, the "national horror," he also believed that many operative causes had to do with having made it so; and his objection to the temperance agitation was that these were left out of account altogether. He thought the gin-shop not fairly to be rendered the exclusive object of attack, until, in connection with the classes who mostly made it their resort, the temptations that led to it, physical and moral, should have been more bravely dealt with. Among the former he counted foul smells, disgusting habitations, bad workshops and workshop-customs, scarcity of light, air, and water, in short the absence of all easy means of decency and health; and among the latter, the mental weariness and languor so induced, the desire of wholesome relaxation, the craving for some stimulus[410] and excitement, not less needful than the sun itself to lives so passed, and last, and inclusive of all the rest, ignorance, and the want of rational mental training, generally applied. This was consistently Dickens's "platform" throughout the years he was known to me; and holding it to be within the reach as well as the scope of legislation, which even our political magnates have been discovering lately, he thought intemperance to be but the one result that, out of all those arising from the absence of legislation, was the most wretched. For him, drunkenness had a teeming and reproachful history anterior to the drunken stage; and he thought it the first duty of the moralist bent upon annihilating the gin-shop, to "strike deep and spare not" at those previous remediable evils. Certainly this was not the way of Mr. Cruikshank, any more than it is that of the many excellent people who take part in temperance agitations. His former tale of the Bottle, as told by his admirable pencil, was that of a decent working man, father of a boy and a girl, living in comfort and good esteem until near the middle age, when, happening unluckily to have a goose for dinner one day in the bosom of his thriving family, he jocularly sends out for a bottle of gin, persuades his wife, until then a picture of neatness and good housewifery, to take a little drop after the stuffing, and the whole family from that moment drink themselves to destruction. The sequel, of which Dickens now wrote to me, traced the lives of the boy and girl after the wretched deaths of their drunken parents, through gin-shop, beer-shop, and dancing-rooms, up to their trial for robbery, when the boy is convicted, dying aboard the hulks; and the girl,[411] desolate and mad after her acquittal, flings herself from London-bridge into the night-darkened river.
Other letters from Broadstairs this summer will finish what he wrote from there last year about Mr. Cruikshank's efforts for temperance and help me highlight something he wanted remembered in his story: there was no issue that he felt more strongly about throughout his life than this. No one pushed for temperance, including its legislative enforcement, with more passion; however, he had important reservations. He didn’t believe drunkenness was an inborn vice or that it affected the poor more than others, so he never agreed that the presence of a gin shop was the sole cause of the problem. He considered it the "national horror," but also believed that many underlying causes contributed to it, and his issue with the temperance movement was that these factors were completely overlooked. He thought it was unfair to single out the gin shop for blame until the temptations—both physical and moral—that led people there, particularly from the classes that frequented those places, were addressed more thoroughly. Among the physical factors, he listed foul smells, dirty living conditions, bad workplaces and work culture, lack of light, air, and water, in essence, the absence of basic decency and health; among the moral ones were the mental exhaustion and fatigue that resulted, the need for healthy relaxation, and the craving for some form of stimulus and excitement—things just as necessary as sunlight for lives lived in such conditions. Lastly, he pointed to ignorance and the lack of rational mental training as foundational issues. This was consistently Dickens's "platform" during the years I knew him, and believing it was within the power of legislation—which even our political leaders have been realizing lately—he thought intemperance was the most miserable outcome stemming from the absence of such laws. For him, drunkenness had a rich and shameful backstory before the state of inebriation, and he thought the moralist's first duty in aiming to eliminate the gin shop was to "strike deep and spare not" at those earlier fixable problems. Certainly, this wasn't the approach of Mr. Cruikshank, nor is it that of many good people involved in temperance movements. His earlier tale of the Bottle, illustrated beautifully by him, depicted a decent working man, a father of a boy and a girl, living comfortably and respected until nearly middle age when, unfortunately, one day he innocently orders a bottle of gin after having a goose for dinner with his thriving family. He humorously convinces his wife, who had been a model of neatness and good housewifery, to take a little drink after the meal, and from that moment on, the whole family descends into destruction through alcohol. The continuation, which Dickens now wrote to me about, followed the lives of the boy and girl after their parents’ tragic deaths due to drinking, through gin shops, beer houses, and dance halls, leading to their trial for robbery, where the boy is convicted and dies while imprisoned, and the girl, desolate and mad after her acquittal, throws herself off London Bridge into the dark, murky river.
"I think," said Dickens, "the power of that closing scene quite extraordinary. It haunts the remembrance like an awful reality. It is full of passion and terror, and I doubt very much whether any hand but his could so have rendered it. There are other fine things too. The death-bed scene on board the hulks; the convict who is composing the face, and the other who is drawing the screen round the bed's head; seem to me masterpieces worthy of the greatest painter. The reality of the place, and the fidelity with which every minute object illustrative of it is presented, are surprising. I think myself no bad judge of this feature, and it is remarkable throughout. In the trial scene at the Old Bailey, the eye may wander round the Court, and observe everything that is a part of the place. The very light and atmosphere are faithfully reproduced. So, in the gin-shop and the beer-shop. An inferior hand would indicate a fragment of the fact, and slur it over; but here every shred is honestly made out. The man behind the bar in the gin-shop, is as real as the convicts at the hulks, or the barristers round the table in the Old Bailey. I found it quite curious, as I closed the book, to recall the number of faces I had seen of individual identity, and to think what a chance they have of living, as the Spanish friar said to Wilkie, when the living have passed away. But it only makes more exasperating to me the obstinate one-sidedness of the thing. When a man shows so forcibly the side of the medal on which the people in their faults and crimes are stamped, he is the more bound to help us to a glance[412] at that other side on which the faults and vices of the governments placed over the people are not less gravely impressed."
"I believe," said Dickens, "the power of that closing scene is quite extraordinary. It stays in memory like a haunting reality. It’s filled with emotion and fear, and I seriously doubt anyone else could have captured it as he did. There are other great moments too. The deathbed scene on the hulks; the convict composing the face, and the other drawing the screen around the head of the bed; all seem to me like masterpieces worthy of the greatest painter. The detail of the setting, and how faithfully every little object related to it is depicted, is impressive. I consider myself a decent judge of this aspect, and it's notable throughout. In the trial scene at the Old Bailey, the eye can scan the courtroom and recognize everything that’s part of the place. Even the light and atmosphere are accurately portrayed. Similarly, in the gin shop and the beer shop. A lesser hand would have noted just a piece of the reality and glossed over it; but here every detail is carefully captured. The man behind the bar in the gin shop is as real as the convicts on the hulks, or the barristers around the table in the Old Bailey. I found it quite interesting, as I finished the book, to remember the number of faces I’d seen with distinct identities, and to think about what chance they have of being remembered, as the Spanish friar said to Wilkie, when the living have passed on. But it only makes the stubborn one-sidedness of this issue more frustrating for me. When a man vividly shows one side of the coin where people's faults and crimes are stamped, he should also help us get a glimpse at that other side where the faults and vices of the governments over the people are just as serious."
This led to some remark on Hogarth's method in such matters, and I am glad to be able to preserve this fine criticism of that great Englishman, by a writer who closely resembled him in genius; as another generation will be probably more apt than our own to discover. "Hogarth avoided the Drunkard's Progress, I conceive, precisely because the causes of drunkenness among the poor were so numerous and widely spread, and lurked so sorrowfully deep and far down in all human misery, neglect, and despair, that even his pencil could not bring them fairly and justly into the light. It was never his plan to be content with only showing the effect. In the death of the miser-father, his shoe new-soled with the binding of his bible, before the young Rake begins his career; in the worldly father, listless daughter, impoverished young lord, and crafty lawyer, of the first plate of Marriage-à-la mode; in the detestable advances through the stages of Cruelty; and in the progress downward of Thomas Idle; you see the effects indeed, but also the causes. He was never disposed to spare the kind of drunkenness that was of more 'respectable' engenderment, as one sees in his midnight modern conversation, the election plates, and crowds of stupid aldermen and other guzzlers. But after one immortal journey down Gin-lane, he turned away in pity and sorrow—perhaps in hope of better things, one day, from better laws and schools and poor men's homes—and went back no more. The scene of Gin-lane, you know, is that just cleared away for the extension[413] of Oxford-street, which we were looking at the other day; and I think it a remarkable trait of Hogarth's picture, that while it exhibits drunkenness in the most appalling forms, it also forces on attention a most neglected wretched neighbourhood, and an unwholesome, indecent, abject condition of life that might be put as frontispiece to our sanitary report of a hundred years later date. I have always myself thought the purpose of this fine piece to be not adequately stated even by Charles Lamb. 'The very houses seem absolutely reeling' it is true; but beside that wonderful picture of what follows intoxication, we have indication quite as powerful of what leads to it among the neglected classes. There is no evidence that any of the actors in the dreary scene have ever been much better than we see them there. The best are pawning the commonest necessaries, and tools of their trades; and the worst are homeless vagrants who give us no clue to their having been otherwise in bygone days. All are living and dying miserably. Nobody is interfering for prevention or for cure, in the generation going out before us, or the generation coming in. The beadle is the only sober man in the composition except the pawnbroker, and he is mightily indifferent to the orphan-child crying beside its parent's coffin. The little charity-girls are not so well taught or looked after, but that they can take to dram-drinking already. The church indeed is very prominent and handsome; but as, quite passive in the picture, it coldly surveys these things in progress under shadow of its tower, I cannot but bethink me that it was not until this year of grace 1848 that a Bishop of London first came out respecting[414] something wrong in poor men's social accommodations, and I am confirmed in my suspicion that Hogarth had many meanings which have not grown obsolete in a century."
This led to some comments on Hogarth's approach to these issues, and I'm glad to share this excellent critique of that great Englishman by a writer who was quite similar to him in talent, as another generation will likely be more inclined to realize. "Hogarth avoided the Drunkard's Progress, I believe, precisely because the reasons for drunkenness among the poor were so numerous and widespread, lurking sorrowfully deep in all human suffering, neglect, and despair, that even his pencil couldn't adequately bring them into the light. It was never his intention to be satisfied with just showing the result. In the death of the miserly father, his shoe newly soled with the binding of his bible, before the young Rake starts his life; in the worldly father, the indifferent daughter, the impoverished young lord, and the cunning lawyer, of the first plate of Marriage-à-la mode; in the horrendous stages of Cruelty; and in the downward spiral of Thomas Idle; you see the results indeed, but also the causes. He never hesitated to depict the kind of drunkenness that was more 'respectable', as seen in his midnight modern conversation, the election plates, and crowds of dim-witted aldermen and other drinkers. But after one unforgettable journey down Gin-lane, he turned away in pity and sadness—perhaps hoping for better things one day, from improved laws and schools and homes for the poor—and never returned. The scene of Gin-lane, you know, is the area just cleared for the extension[413] of Oxford-street, which we were looking at the other day; and I think it's a remarkable feature of Hogarth's picture that while it shows drunkenness in the most horrifying forms, it also brings attention to a woefully neglected, wretched neighborhood, and an unhealthy, degrading condition of life that could serve as the frontispiece to our sanitary report from a hundred years later. I have always thought the purpose of this excellent piece hasn't been fully captured even byCharles Lamb. 'The very houses seem absolutely reeling', it’s true; but alongside that striking depiction of the aftermath of intoxication, we have just as powerful an indication of what causes it among the neglected classes. There's no evidence that any of the people in that grim scene have ever been much better than we see them there. The best are pawning their most basic necessities and tools for work; and the worst are homeless vagrants, giving us no hints that they were any different in the past. All are living and dying in misery. Nobody is stepping in for prevention or for healing, in the generation exiting before us, or the generation coming in. The beadle is the only sober man in the picture aside from the pawnbroker, and he is very indifferent to the orphan child crying beside its parent’s coffin. The little charity girls aren’t so well taught or cared for that they can’t already turn to drinking. The church is indeed very prominent and attractive; but as it coolly observes these events unfold in the shadow of its tower, I can't help but think that it wasn’t until this year of grace 1848 that a Bishop of London first addressed something wrong regarding poor people's social conditions, and I am strengthened in my suspicion that Hogarth had many meanings that have not become outdated in a century."
Another art-criticism by Dickens should be added. Upon a separate publication by Leech of some drawings on stone called the Rising Generation, from designs done for Mr. Punch's gallery, he wrote at my request a little essay of which a few sentences will find appropriate place with his letter on the other great caricaturist of his time. I use that word, as he did, only for want of a better. Dickens was of opinion that, in this particular line of illustration, while he conceded all his fame to the elder and stronger contemporary, Mr. Leech was the very first Englishman who had made Beauty a part of his art; and he held, that, by striking out this course, and setting the successful example of introducing always into his most whimsical pieces some beautiful faces or agreeable forms, he had done more than any other man of his generation to refine a branch of art to which the facilities of steam-printing and wood-engraving were giving almost unrivalled diffusion and popularity. His opinion of Leech in a word was that he turned caricature into character; and would leave behind him not a little of the history of his time and its follies, sketched with inimitable grace.
Another art critique by Dickens should be included. In response to Leech’s separate publication of some drawings on stone titled the Rising Generation, based on designs for Mr. Punch's gallery, he wrote a short essay at my request, a few sentences of which will be appropriately included with his letter about the other major caricaturist of his era. I use that term, as he did, simply because there isn’t a better one. Dickens believed that, in this particular style of illustration, while he granted all his fame to the older and stronger contemporary, Mr. Leech was the very first Englishman to incorporate Beauty into his art; he felt that, by taking this approach and setting a successful example by consistently featuring beautiful faces or attractive forms in his most whimsical pieces, he had done more than anyone else of his generation to elevate a branch of art that steam-printing and wood-engraving were rapidly popularizing. In short, his view of Leech was that he transformed caricature into character and would leave behind a significant portion of the history of his time and its follies, sketched with unmatched elegance.
"If we turn back to a collection of the works of Rowlandson or Gilray, we shall find, in spite of the great humour displayed in many of them, that they are rendered wearisome and unpleasant by a vast amount of personal ugliness. Now, besides that it is a poor device to represent what is satirized as being necessarily[415] ugly, which is but the resource of an angry child or a jealous woman, it serves no purpose but to produce a disagreeable result. There is no reason why the farmer's daughter in the old caricature who is squalling at the harpsichord (to the intense delight, by the bye, of her worthy father, whom it is her duty to please) should be squab and hideous. The satire on the manner of her education, if there be any in the thing at all, would be just as good, if she were pretty. Mr. Leech would have made her so. The average of farmers' daughters in England are not impossible lumps of fat. One is quite as likely to find a pretty girl in a farm-house, as to find an ugly one; and we think, with Mr. Leech, that the business of this Style of art is with the pretty one. She is not only a pleasanter object, but we have more interest in her. We care more about what does become her, and does not become her. Mr. Leech represented the other day certain delicate creatures with bewitching countenances encased in several varieties of that amazing garment, the ladies' paletot. Formerly those fair creatures would have been made as ugly and ungainly as possible, and then the point would have been lost. The spectator, with a laugh at the absurdity of the whole group, would not have cared how such uncouth creatures disguised themselves, or how ridiculous they became. . . . But to represent female beauty as Mr. Leech represents it, an artist must have, a most delicate perception of it; and the gift of being able to realise it to us with two or three slight, sure touches of his pencil. This power Mr. Leech possesses, in an extraordinary degree. . . . For this reason, we enter our protest against those of[416] the Rising Generation who are precociously in love being made the subject of merriment by a pitiless and unsympathizing world. We never saw a boy more distinctly in the right than the young gentleman kneeling on the chair to beg a lock of hair from his pretty cousin, to take back to school. Madness is in her apron, and Virgil dog's-eared and defaced is in her ringlets. Doubts may suggest themselves of the perfect disinterestedness of the other young gentleman contemplating the fair girl at the piano—doubts engendered by his worldly allusion to 'tin'; though even that may have arisen in his modest consciousness of his own inability to support an establishment—but that he should be 'deucedly inclined to go and cut that fellow out,' appears to us one of the most natural emotions of the human breast. The young gentleman with the dishevelled hair and clasped hands who loves the transcendant beauty with the bouquet, and can't be happy without her, is to us a withering and desolate spectacle. Who could be happy without her? . . . The growing youths are not less happily observed and agreeably depicted than the grown women. The languid little creature who 'hasn't danced since he was quite a boy,' is perfect; and the eagerness of the small dancer whom he declines to receive for a partner at the hands of the glorious old lady of the house (the little feet quite ready for the first position, the whole heart projected into the quadrille, and the glance peeping timidly at the desired one out of a flutter of hope and doubt) is quite delightful to look at. The intellectual juvenile who awakens the tremendous wrath of a Norma of private life by considering woman an inferior animal,[417] is lecturing at the present moment, we understand, on the Concrete in connexion with the Will. The legs of the young philosopher who considers Shakespeare an over-rated man, were seen by us dangling over the side of an omnibus last Tuesday. We have no acquaintance with the scowling young gentleman who is clear that 'if his Governor don't like the way he goes on in, why he must have chambers and so much a week;' but if he is not by this time in Van Diemen's land, he will certainly go to it through Newgate. We should exceedingly dislike to have personal property in a strong box, to live in the suburb of Camberwell, and to be in the relation of bachelor-uncle to that youth. . . . In all his designs, whatever Mr. Leech desires to do, he does. His drawing seems to us charming; and the expression indicated, though by the simplest means, is exactly the natural expression, and is recognised as such immediately. Some forms of our existing life will never have a better chronicler. His wit is good-natured, and always the wit of a gentleman. He has a becoming sense of responsibility and self-restraint; he delights in agreeable things; he imparts some pleasant air of his own to things not pleasant in themselves; he is suggestive and full of matter; and he is always improving. Into the tone as well as into the execution of what he does, he has brought a certain elegance which is altogether new, without involving any compromise of what is true. Popular art in England has not had so rich an acquisition." Dickens's closing allusion was to a remark made by Mr. Ford in a review of Oliver Twist formerly referred to. "It is eight or ten years since a writer in[418] the Quarterly Review, making mention of Mr. George Cruikshank, commented on the absurdity of excluding such a man from the Royal Academy, because his works were not produced in certain materials, and did not occupy a certain space in its annual shows. Will no Associates be found upon its books one of these days, the labours of whose oil and brushes will have sunk into the profoundest obscurity, when many pencil-marks of Mr. Cruikshank and of Mr. Leech will be still fresh in half the houses in the land?"
"If we look at a collection of works by Rowlandson or Gilray, we’ll see that, despite the humor in many of them, they can become tiresome and unpleasant due to a lot of personal ugliness. Besides the fact that it’s a poor tactic to depict what’s being satirized as necessarily ugly—something that just reflects the mindset of an angry child or a jealous woman—it serves no real purpose other than creating a distasteful outcome. There’s no reason for the farmer's daughter in the old caricature who’s screaming at the harpsichord (much to the delight of her devoted father, whose approval she seeks) to be ugly and unattractive. The satire on her education, if it exists at all, would still be effective if she were portrayed as pretty. Mr. Leech would have made her so. The average farmer's daughter in England isn’t a grotesque lump of fat. One is just as likely to find a pretty girl in a farmhouse as an ugly one; and we believe, like Mr. Leech, that this type of art should focus on the pretty ones. Not only are they more pleasant to look at, but we also care more about how they present themselves. We’re more interested in what suits them and what doesn’t. Recently, Mr. Leech depicted delicate creatures with enchanting faces dressed in various styles of the amazing ladies' paletot. In the past, those lovely beings would have been illustrated as ugly and awkward, which would have missed the point. The audience, laughing at the absurdity of the group, wouldn’t have cared how such clumsy creatures attempted to dress themselves or how ridiculous they appeared. But to portray female beauty as Mr. Leech does, an artist must have a refined perception of it; they must be able to convey it to us with just a few light, confident strokes of their pencil. Mr. Leech possesses this skill to an extraordinary degree. For this reason, we object to those from the Rising Generation who are skillfully in love being made the target of ridicule by a harsh and unsympathetic world. We’ve never seen a boy more justified than the young gentleman kneeling on the chair, asking his pretty cousin for a lock of hair to take back to school. There’s madness in her apron, and a defaced Virgil in her curls. We might doubt the absolute selflessness of the other young gentleman gazing at the beautiful girl at the piano—doubts raised by his worldly reference to 'tin'; although even that might come from his modest awareness of his inability to maintain a household—but the idea that he would feel 'strongly inclined to cut that fellow out' seems to us one of the most natural feelings a person could have. The young man with messy hair and clasped hands, who adores the transcendent beauty with the bouquet and can’t be happy without her, is a sorrowful spectacle. Who could be happy without her? The young boys are just as well portrayed and delightfully observed as the grown women. The sleepy little guy who 'hasn't danced since he was quite young' is perfect; and the eagerness of the little dancer whom he refuses to partner with at the hands of the glamorous old lady of the house (with her tiny feet ready for the first position and her heart full of hope and uncertainty) is truly delightful to see. The intellectual youth currently stirring enormous anger in a private Norma by considering women as inferior beings is, we understand, lecturing at the moment on the Concrete in relation to the Will. We saw the legs of the young philosopher who thinks Shakespeare is overrated dangling over the side of an omnibus last Tuesday. We have no connection with the scowling young gentleman who is sure that 'if his Governor doesn’t like how he behaves, then he must have his own place,' but if he isn’t already in Van Diemen's Land, he will definitely get there via Newgate. We would highly dislike to have personal involvement with a strong box, to live in the suburb of Camberwell, and to be the bachelor uncle to that boy. In all his endeavors, whatever Mr. Leech sets out to do, he accomplishes. His drawings are charming; the expression, though depicted through the simplest means, perfectly reflects genuine emotion and is recognized as such immediately. Some aspects of our current life may never find a better chronicler. His wit is kind-hearted, and always reflects the wit of a gentleman. He carries a commendable sense of responsibility and self-control; he enjoys pleasant things; he brings a nice touch to things that aren’t inherently pleasant; he is thought-provoking and full of substance; and he is always improving. He has infused a certain elegance into both the tone and execution of his work, which is completely new, without compromising on what is true. Popular art in England hasn’t had such a rich addition." Dickens’s final reference was to a comment made by Mr. Ford in a previous review of Oliver Twist. "It’s been eight or ten years since a writer in the Quarterly Review mentioned Mr. George Cruikshank and criticized the absurdity of excluding such a man from the Royal Academy simply because his works were not created with specific materials and didn’t take up a certain space in its annual exhibitions. Will there ever be Associates in its ranks who, one day, will produce works whose oil and brush-strokes will have faded into obscurity, while the pencil marks of Mr. Cruikshank and Mr. Leech remain vivid in half the homes across the country?"
Of what otherwise occupied him at Broadstairs in 1848 there is not much to mention until the close of his holiday. He used to say that he never went for more than a couple of days from his own home without something befalling him that never happened to anyone else, and his Broadstairs adventure of the present summer verged closer on tragedy than comedy. Returning there one day in August after bringing up his boys to school, it had been arranged that his wife should meet him at Margate; but he had walked impatiently far beyond the place for meeting when at last he caught sight of her, not in the small chaise but in a large carriage and pair followed by an excited crowd, and with the youth that should have been driving the little pony bruised and bandaged on the box behind the two prancing horses. "You may faintly imagine my amazement at encountering this carriage, and the strange people, and Kate, and the crowd, and the bandaged one, and all the rest of it." And then in a line or two I had the story. "At the top of a steep hill on the road, with a ditch on each side, the pony bolted, upon which what does John do but jump out! He says[419] he was thrown out, but it cannot be. The reins immediately became entangled in the wheels, and away went the pony down the hill madly, with Kate inside rending the Isle of Thanet with her screams. The accident might have been a fearful one, if the pony had not, thank Heaven, on getting to the bottom, pitched over the side; breaking the shaft and cutting her hind legs, but in the most extraordinary manner smashing her own way apart. She tumbled down, a bundle of legs with her head tucked underneath, and left the chaise standing on the bank! A Captain Devaynes and his wife were passing in their carriage at the moment, saw the accident with no power of preventing it, got Kate out, laid her on the grass, and behaved with infinite kindness. All's well that ends well, and I think she's really none the worse for the fright. John is in bed a good deal bruised, but without any broken bone, and likely soon to come right; though for the present plastered all over, and, like Squeers, a brown-paper parcel chock-full of nothing but groans. The women generally have no sympathy for him whatever; and the nurse says, with indignation, how could he go and leave an unprotected female in the shay!"
Of what else kept him busy at Broadstairs in 1848, there’s not much to mention until his holiday came to an end. He used to say that he never went more than a couple of days away from home without something happening to him that never happened to anyone else, and his Broadstairs adventure that summer leaned more toward tragedy than comedy. One day in August, after dropping his boys off at school, he was supposed to meet his wife at Margate; however, he walked far beyond their meeting spot before he finally saw her, not in the small carriage but in a large one drawn by two horses, followed by an excited crowd, and with the young man who should’ve been driving the little pony all bruised and bandaged on the box behind the prancing horses. "You can imagine my shock at seeing this carriage, the strange people, Kate, the crowd, the bandaged guy, and everything else." Then just a couple of lines later, I got the story. "At the top of a steep hill on the road, with a ditch on each side, the pony bolted, and what does John do but jump out! He claims he was thrown out, but that can’t be. The reins got tangled in the wheels, and the pony took off down the hill crazily, with Kate inside screaming bloody murder. It could have been a terrible accident if the pony hadn’t, thank heaven, tumbled over at the bottom; breaking the shaft and cutting her hind legs, but in the most bizarre way, she managed to smash her way apart. She fell, a jumble of legs with her head tucked underneath, leaving the carriage sitting on the bank! A Captain Devaynes and his wife happened to be passing in their carriage at that moment, saw the accident unfolding without being able to prevent it, got Kate out, laid her on the grass, and were incredibly kind. All’s well that ends well, and I really think she’s none the worse for the scare. John is in bed quite bruised, but thankfully with no broken bones, and should recover soon; although for now, he’s plastered all over and, like Squeers, a brown-paper parcel full of nothing but groans. The women generally have no sympathy for him at all; and the nurse says angrily, how could he go and leave a defenseless woman in the carriage?"
Holiday incidents there were many, but none that need detain us. This was really a summer idleness: for it was the interval between two of his important undertakings, there was no periodical yet to make demands on him, and only the task of finishing his Haunted Man for Christmas lay ahead. But he did even his nothings in a strenuous way, and on occasion could make gallant fight against the elements themselves. He reported himself, to my horror, thrice wet[420] through on a single day, "dressed four times," and finding all sorts of great things, brought out by the rains, among the rocks on the sea-beach. He also sketched now and then morsels of character for me, of which I will preserve one. "F is philosophical, from sunrise to bedtime: chiefly in the French line, about French women going mad, and in that state coming to their husbands, and saying, 'Mon ami, je vous ai trompé. Voici les lettres de mon amant!' Whereupon the husbands take the letters and think them waste paper, and become extra-philosophical at finding that they really were the lover's effusions: though what there is of philosophy in it all, or anything but unwholesomeness, it is not easy to see." (A remark that it might not be out of place to offer to Mr. Taine's notice.) "Likewise about dark shades coming over our wedded Emmeline's face at parties; and about F handing her to her carriage, and saying, 'May I come in, for a lift homeward?' and she bending over him out of window, and saying in a low voice, I dare not! And then of the carriage driving away like lightning, leaving F more philosophical than ever on the pavement." Not till the close of September I heard of work intruding itself, in a letter twitting me for a broken promise in not joining him: "We are reasonably jolly, but rurally so; going to bed o' nights at ten, and bathing o' mornings at half-past seven; and not drugging ourselves with those dirty and spoiled waters of Lethe that flow round the base of the great pyramid." Then, after mention of the friends who had left him, Sheriff Gordon, the Leeches, Lemon, Egg and Stone: "reflection and pensiveness are coming. I have [421]not
Holiday incidents were numerous, but none worth lingering on. This was really a summer of doing nothing: it was the gap between two of his big projects, there were no magazines demanding his attention yet, and the only thing ahead was finishing his Haunted Man for Christmas. But he approached his downtime with vigor and occasionally managed to bravely battle against the elements themselves. To my horror, he reported being drenched three times in a single day, "dressed four times," and discovering all sorts of fascinating stuff washed up by the rain among the rocks on the beach. He also occasionally shared bits of character sketches with me, and I’ll keep one of them. "F is philosophical from dawn to dusk: mostly in a French way, about French women going mad, and in that state coming to their husbands, saying, 'Mon ami, je vous ai trompé. Voici les lettres de mon amant!' Then the husbands take the letters and think they’re just waste paper, only to become extra-philosophical when they realize they actually are the lover's letters: though it’s hard to see what’s philosophical or anything but unpleasant about it." (A comment that might be interesting for Mr. Taine to consider.) "Also about the dark shadows that come over our married Emmeline's face at parties; and about F escorting her to her carriage, asking, 'May I come in for a ride home?' and her leaning out of the window to say in a low voice, I wouldn't dare! And then the carriage zooming away, leaving F even more philosophical on the sidewalk." It wasn't until the end of September that I heard of work getting in the way, in a letter teasing me about breaking my promise not to join him: "We’re reasonably cheerful, but in a rural way; going to bed at ten, and bathing in the mornings at seven-thirty; and not numbing ourselves with those filthy and spoiled waters of Lethe that flow around the base of the great pyramid." Then, after mentioning the friends who had gone, Sheriff Gordon, the Leeches, Lemon, Egg, and Stone: "reflection and pensiveness are creeping in. I have [421]not
—saw Fancy write
With a beam of light
On the blotter so solid, commanding the sea!'
His first seaside holiday in 1849 was at Brighton, where he passed some weeks in February; and not, I am bound to add, without the usual unusual adventure to signalize his visit. He had not been a week in his[422] lodgings, where Leech and his wife joined him, when both his landlord and the daughter of his landlord went raving mad, and the lodgers were driven away to the Bedford hotel. "If you could have heard the cursing and crying of the two; could have seen the physician and nurse quoited out into the passage by the madman at the hazard of their lives; could have seen Leech and me flying to the doctor's rescue; could have seen our wives pulling us back; could have seen the M.D. faint with fear; could have seen three other M.D.'s come to his aid; with an atmosphere of Mrs. Gamps, strait-waistcoats, struggling friends and servants, surrounding the whole; you would have said it was quite worthy of me, and quite in keeping with my usual proceedings." The letter ended with a word on what then his thoughts were full of, but for which no name had yet been found. "A sea-fog to-day, but yesterday inexpressibly delicious. My mind running, like a high sea, on names—not satisfied yet, though." When he next wrote from the seaside, in the beginning of July, he had found the name; had started his book; and was "rushing to Broadstairs" to write the fourth number of David Copperfield.
His first seaside vacation in 1849 was at Brighton, where he spent a few weeks in February; and I must add, not without the usual unusual adventure to mark his visit. He had barely been a week in his[422]lodgings, where Leech and his wife joined him, when both his landlord and the landlord’s daughter went completely mad, forcing the lodgers to evacuate to the Bedford hotel. "If you could have heard the cursing and crying from the two; if you could have seen the doctor and nurse thrown into the hallway by the madman at the risk of their lives; if you could have seen Leech and me rushing to the doctor’s aid; if you could have seen our wives pulling us back; if you could have seen the doctor fainting from fear; if you could have seen three other doctors come to help him, all surrounded by an atmosphere of Mrs. Gamps, straitjackets, and struggling friends and servants; you would have said it was quite fitting for me and totally in line with my usual antics." The letter concluded with a note about what was currently filling his thoughts, yet for which no name had been found. "A sea fog today, but yesterday was indescribably wonderful. My mind racing, like a wild sea, on names—not satisfied yet, though." When he wrote again from the seaside at the beginning of July, he had found the name; had begun his book; and was "rushing to Broadstairs" to write the fourth installment of David Copperfield.
In this came the childish experiences which had left so deep an impression upon him, and over which he had some difficulty in throwing the needful disguises. "Fourteen miles to-day in the country," he had written to me on the 21st of June, "revolving number four!" Still he did not quite see his way. Three days later he wrote: "On leaving you last night, I found myself summoned on a special jury in the Queen's Bench to-day. I have taken no notice of[423] the document,[153] and hourly expect to be dragged forth to a dungeon for contempt of court. I think I should rather like it. It might help me with a new notion or two in my difficulties. Meanwhile I shall take a stroll to-night in the green fields from 7 to 10, if you feel inclined to join." His troubles ended when he got to Broadstairs, from which he wrote on the tenth of July to tell me that agreeably to the plan we had discussed he had introduced a great part of his MS. into the number. "I really think I have done it ingeniously, and with a very complicated interweaving of truth and fiction. Vous verrez. I am getting on like a house afire in point of health, and ditto ditto in point of number."
In this came the childish experiences that had left such a deep impression on him, and he struggled to mask them as needed. "Fourteen miles today in the countryside," he wrote to me on June 21, "revolving number four!" Yet he still couldn't find his way. Three days later he wrote: "After leaving you last night, I found myself summoned for a special jury in the Queen's Bench today. I haven't acknowledged the document,[423] [153] and I expect to be dragged out to a dungeon for contempt of court at any moment. I think I might actually like it. It could give me a fresh perspective on my struggles. In the meantime, I plan to take a walk tonight in the green fields from 7 to 10, if you want to join." His troubles ended when he got to Broadstairs, from where he wrote on July 10 to let me know that, according to our plan, he had incorporated a significant portion of his manuscript into the number. "I really think I've done it cleverly, with a very intricate blend of truth and fiction. Vous verrez. I'm doing great in terms of health, and the same goes for the number."
In the middle of July the number was nearly done, and he was still doubtful where to pass his longer summer holiday. Leech wished to join him in it, and both desired a change from Broadstairs. At first he thought of Folkestone,[154] but disappointment there led[424] to a sudden change. "I propose" (15th of July) "returning to town to-morrow by the boat from Ramsgate, and going off to Weymouth or the Isle of Wight, or both, early the next morning." A few days after, his choice was made.
In mid-July, the number was almost finished, and he was still unsure about where to spend his longer summer vacation. Leech wanted to join him, and they both wanted a break from Broadstairs. At first, he considered Folkestone,[154] but being disappointed there made him change plans quickly. "I propose" (July 15th) "to go back to town tomorrow by the boat from Ramsgate and leave for Weymouth or the Isle of Wight, or both, early the next morning." A few days later, he made his decision.
He had taken a house at Bonchurch, attracted there by the friend who had made it a place of interest for him during the last few years, the Reverend James White, with whose name and its associations my mind connects inseparably many of Dickens's happiest hours. To pay him fitting tribute would not be easy, if here it were called for. In the kindly shrewd Scotch face, a keen sensitiveness to pleasure and pain was the first thing that struck any common observer. Cheerfulness and gloom coursed over it so rapidly that no one could question the tale they told. But the relish of his life had outlived its more than usual share of sorrows; and quaint sly humour, love of jest and merriment, capital knowledge of books, and sagacious quips at men, made his companionship delightful. Like his life, his genius was made up of alternations of mirth and melancholy. He would be immersed, at one time, in those darkest Scottish annals from which he drew his tragedies; and overflowing, at another, into Sir Frizzle Pumpkin's exuberant farce. The tragic histories may probably perish with the actor's perishable art; but three little abstracts of history written at a later time in prose, with a sunny[426] clearness of narration and a glow of picturesque interest to my knowledge unequalled in books of such small pretension, will find, I hope, a lasting place in literature. They are filled with felicities of phrase, with breadth of understanding and judgment, with manful honesty, quiet sagacity, and a constant cheerful piety, valuable for all and priceless for the young. Another word I permit myself to add. With Dickens, White was popular supremely for his eager good fellowship; and few men brought him more of what he always liked to receive. But he brought nothing so good as his wife. "He is excellent, but she is better," is the pithy remark of his first Bonchurch letter; and the true affection and respect that followed is happily still borne her by his daughters.
He had rented a house in Bonchurch, drawn there by a friend who had made it special to him over the past few years, the Reverend James White. I can’t help but connect him with many of Dickens's happiest moments. Paying him the right tribute wouldn’t be easy if it were necessary here. To any casual observer, the first thing that stood out about the kindly, sharp Scottish face was its keen sensitivity to pleasure and pain. Cheerfulness and gloom flickered across it so quickly that no one could doubt the stories it told. However, the enjoyment of his life had survived more than its fair share of sorrows, and his quirky sense of humor, love for jokes and fun, extensive knowledge of books, and wise comments on people made his company a joy. Both his life and his genius were marked by swings between laughter and sadness. At times, he would be lost in the darkest Scottish histories from which he drew his tragedies, and at others, he would burst into Sir Frizzle Pumpkin's lively farce. The tragic tales might fade along with the actor’s fleeting art, but I hope that three little historical summaries written later in prose, with a bright clarity of narration and a vivid charm unmatched in books of such modest ambition, will find a lasting place in literature. They are full of beautifully crafted phrases, deep understanding and judgment, sincere honesty, quiet wisdom, and a constant cheerful faith—valuable for everyone and priceless for the young. One more thing I’d like to add: Dickens was supremely popular with White for his enthusiastic camaraderie, and few people brought him more of what he loved to receive. But he didn’t bring anything as good as his wife. “He is excellent, but she is better,” is the succinct remark from his first letter from Bonchurch, and the genuine affection and respect that followed are still cherished by his daughters.
Of course there is something strange to be recorded of the Bonchurch holiday, but it does not come till nearer the ending; and, with more attention to Mrs. Malaprop's advice to begin with a little aversion, might probably not have come at all. He began with an excess of liking. Of the Undercliff he was full of admiration. "From the top of the highest downs," he wrote in his second letter (28th of July) "there are views which are only to be equalled on the Genoese shore of the Mediterranean; the variety of walks is extraordinary; things are cheap, and everybody is civil. The waterfall acts wonderfully, and the sea bathing is delicious. Best of all, the place is certainly cold rather than hot, in the summer time. The evenings have been even chilly. White very jovial, and emulous of the inimitable in respect of gin-punch. He had made some for our arrival. Ha! ha! not bad for a beginner. . . .[427] I have been, and am, trying to work this morning; but I can't make anything of it, and am going out to think. I am invited by a distinguished friend to dine with you on the first of August, but I have pleaded distance and the being resident in a cave on the sea shore; my food, beans; my drink, the water from the rock. . . . I must pluck up heart of grace to write to Jeffrey, of whom I had but poor accounts from Gordon just before leaving. Talfourd delightful, and amuses me mightily. I am really quite enraptured at his success, and think of his happiness with uncommon pleasure." Our friend was now on the bench; which he adorned with qualities that are justly the pride of that profession, and with accomplishments that have become more rare in its highest places than they were in former times. His elevation only made those virtues better known. Talfourd assumed nothing with the ermine but the privilege of more frequent intercourse with the tastes and friends he loved, and he continued to be the most joyous and least affected of companions. Such small oddities or foibles as he had made him secretly only dearer to Dickens, who had no friend he was more attached to; and the many happy nights made happier by the voice so affluent in generous words, and the face so bright with ardent sensibility, come back to me sorrowfully now. "Deaf the prais'd ear, and mute the tuneful tongue." The poet's line has a double application and sadness.
Of course, there’s something odd to mention about the Bonchurch holiday, but that comes later; and if I’d paid more attention to Mrs. Malaprop's advice to start with a little dislike, it might not have come up at all. He began with way too much enthusiasm. He was full of admiration for the Undercliff. "From the top of the highest downs," he wrote in his second letter (July 28th), "there are views that can only be matched on the Genoese coast of the Mediterranean; the variety of walks is amazing; things are cheap, and everyone is polite. The waterfall is incredible, and the sea bathing is wonderful. Best of all, the place is definitely cooler rather than hotter in the summer. The evenings have even been a bit chilly. White is very cheerful, and trying to outdo the best when it comes to gin-punch. He made some for our arrival. Ha! ha! not bad for a newbie. . . .[427] I’ve been trying to work this morning, but I can’t get anything done, so I’m going out to think. I’ve been invited by a well-known friend to dine with you on August 1st, but I’ve used the excuse of the distance and that I’m living in a cave by the sea; my food is beans, my drink is water from the rock. . . . I need to muster the courage to write to Jeffrey, from whom I received only grim updates from Gordon just before I left. Talfourd is delightful and really entertains me. I’m genuinely thrilled about his success and think of his happiness with great pleasure." Our friend is now on the bench, bringing qualities that truly make the profession proud and skills that have become rarer in its highest ranks than they used to be. His promotion made those virtues even more recognized. Talfourd didn’t take on anything with the ermine except the chance for more regular interactions with the tastes and people he loved, and he remained the most joyful and least pretentious companion. The small quirks he had made him secretly even dearer to Dickens, who had no friend he was more attached to; and the many happy nights, made even better by his generous words and bright, sensitive face, come back to me sadly now. "Deaf the prais'd ear, and mute the tuneful tongue." The poet's line has a dual meaning and sadness.
He wrote again on the first of August. "I have just begun to get into work. We are expecting the Queen to come by very soon, in grand array, and are going to let off ever so many guns. I had a letter from[428] Jeffrey yesterday morning, just as I was going to write to him. He has evidently been very ill, and I begin to have fears for his recovery. It is a very pathetic letter, as to his state of mind; but only in a tranquil contemplation of death, which I think very noble." His next letter, four days later, described himself as continuing still at work; but also taking part in dinners at Blackgang, and picnics of "tremendous success" on Shanklin Down. "Two charity sermons for the school are preached to-day, and I go to the afternoon one. The examination of said school t'other day was very funny. All the boys made Buckstone's bow in the Rough Diamond, and some in a very wonderful manner recited pieces of poetry, about a clock, and may we be like the clock, which is always a going and a doing of its duty, and always tells the truth (supposing it to be a slap-up chronometer I presume, for the American clock in the school was lying frightfully at that moment); and after being bothered to death by the multiplication table, they were refreshed with a public tea in Lady Jane Swinburne's garden." (There was a reference in one of his letters, but I have lost it, to a golden-haired lad of the Swinburnes whom his own boys used to play with, since become more widely known.) "The rain came in with the first tea-pot, and has been active ever since. On Friday we had a grand, and what is better, a very good dinner at 'parson' Fielden's, with some choice port. On Tuesday we are going on another picnic; with the materials for a fire, at my express stipulation; and a great iron pot to boil potatoes in. These things, and the eatables, go to the ground in a cart. Last night we had some very good merriment[429] at White's, where pleasant Julian Young and his wife (who are staying about five miles off) showed some droll new games"—and roused the ambition in my friend to give a "mighty conjuring performance for all the children in Bonchurch," for which I sent him the materials and which went off in a tumult of wild delight. To the familiar names in this letter I will add one more, grieving freshly even now to connect it with suffering. "A letter from Poole has reached me since I began this letter, with tidings in it that you will be very sorry to hear. Poor Regnier has lost his only child; the pretty daughter who dined with us that nice day at your house, when we all pleased the poor mother by admiring her so much. She died of a sudden attack of malignant typhus. Poole was at the funeral, and writes that he never saw, or could have imagined, such intensity of grief as Regnier's at the grave. How one loves him for it. But is it not always true, in comedy and in tragedy, that the more real the man the more genuine the actor?"
He wrote again on August 1st. "I've just started getting into work. We're expecting the Queen to visit soon, in style, and we're going to fire off a lot of guns. I got a letter from [428] Jeffrey yesterday morning, just when I was about to write to him. He’s clearly been very ill, and I’m starting to worry about his recovery. It’s a really sad letter regarding his state of mind, but it's only a calm reflection on death, which I think is quite noble." His next letter, four days later, said he was still working; but he was also joining dinners at Blackgang and enjoying "tremendous success" picnics on Shanklin Down. "Two charity sermons for the school are being held today, and I’m going to the afternoon one. The school examination the other day was pretty funny. All the boys did Buckstone's bow in the Rough Diamond, and some in a really impressive way recited poetry about a clock, stating that we should be like the clock, which is always working and fulfilling its duty, and always tells the truth (assuming it’s a top-notch chronometer, because the American clock in the school was lying badly at that moment); and after being completely bewildered by the multiplication table, they enjoyed a public tea in Lady Jane Swinburne's garden." (There was a mention in one of his letters, but I lost it, about a golden-haired boy from the Swinburnes whom my boys used to play with, who has since become better known.) "The rain came in with the first teapot and hasn’t stopped since. On Friday we had a great, and what’s better, a really good dinner at 'parson' Fielden's, along with some fine port. On Tuesday, we’re going on another picnic; with stuff to make a fire, at my specific request; and a big iron pot to boil potatoes in. These things, along with the food, will go to the site in a cart. Last night we had a lot of fun at White's, where the lovely Julian Young and his wife (who are staying about five miles away) showed some amusing new games"—and sparked my friend's ambition to put on a "big magic show for all the kids in Bonchurch," for which I sent him the materials and which turned out to be a huge hit filled with wild joy. To the familiar names in this letter, I'll add one more, which brings sorrow to connect with suffering. "I've received a letter from Poole since I started this letter, with news that you will be very saddened to hear. Poor Regnier has lost his only child; the lovely daughter who had dinner with us on that nice day at your house, when we all made the poor mother happy by admiring her so much. She died from a sudden case of malignant typhus. Poole was at the funeral and wrote that he never saw, or could have imagined, such profound grief as Regnier showed at the graveside. How one loves him for that. But isn’t it always true, in both comedy and tragedy, that the more real the man, the more genuine the actor?"
After a few more days I heard of progress with his writing in spite of all festivities. "I have made it a rule that the inimitable is invisible, until two every day. I shall have half the number done, please God, to-morrow. I have not worked quickly here yet, but I don't know what I may do. Divers cogitations have occupied my mind at intervals, respecting the dim design." The design was the weekly periodical so often in his thoughts, of which more will appear in my next chapter. His letter closed with intimations of discomfort in his health; of an obstinate cough; and of a determination he had formed to mount daily to the top[430] of the downs. "It makes a great difference in the climate to get a blow there and come down again." Then I heard of the doctor "stethoscoping" him, of his hope that all was right in that quarter, and of rubbings "à la St. John Long" being ordered for his chest. But the mirth still went on. "There has been a Doctor Lankester at Sandown, a very good merry fellow, who has made one at the picnics, and whom I went over and dined with, along with Danby (I remember your liking for Danby, and don't wonder at it), Leech, and White." A letter towards the close of August resumed yet more of his ordinary tone. "We had games and forfeits last night at White's. Davy Roberts's pretty little daughter is there for a week, with her husband, Bicknell's son. There was a dinner first to say good-bye to Danby, who goes to other clergyman's-duty, and we were very merry. Mrs. White unchanging; White comically various in his moods. Talfourd comes down next Tuesday, and we think of going over to Ryde on Monday, visiting the play, sleeping there (I don't mean at the play), and bringing the Judge back. Browne is coming down when he has done his month's work. Should you like to go to Alum Bay while you are here? It would involve a night out, but I think would be very pleasant; and if you think so too, I will arrange it sub rosâ, so that we may not be, like Bobadil, 'oppressed by numbers.' I mean to take a fly over from Shanklin to meet you at Ryde; so that we can walk back from Shanklin over the landslip, where the scenery is wonderfully beautiful. Stone and Egg are coming next month, and we hope to see Jerrold before we go." Such notices from his[431] letters may be thought hardly worth preserving; but a wonderful vitality in every circumstance, as long as life under any conditions remained to the writer, is the picture they contribute to; nor would it be complete without the addition, that fond as he was, in the intervals of his work, of this abundance and variety of enjoyments, to no man were so essential also those quieter hours of thought, and talk, not obtainable when "oppressed by numbers."
After a few more days, I heard about his progress with writing despite all the celebrations. "I've decided that the unique is invisible until two o'clock every day. I should have half of it done, God willing, by tomorrow. I haven't worked quickly here yet, but I'm not sure what I might do. Various thoughts have occupied my mind from time to time regarding the vague plan." The plan was the weekly magazine he often thought about, which I'll share more about in my next chapter. His letter ended with hints about health issues; an persistent cough; and his determination to hike up to the top[430] of the hills every day. "Getting some fresh air up there makes a big difference in the climate when you come back down." Then I heard about the doctor examining him with a stethoscope, of his hope that everything was okay in that area, and that treatments "à la St. John Long" were ordered for his chest. But the fun continued. "There's been a Doctor Lankester at Sandown, a really cheerful guy, who joined in the picnics, and I went over and had dinner with him, along with Danby (I remember how much you liked Danby, and I don't blame you), Leech, and White." A letter towards the end of August returned to a more familiar tone. "We had games and forfeits last night at White's. Davy Roberts's cute little daughter is visiting for a week with her husband, Bicknell's son. We had a dinner to say goodbye to Danby, who is moving on to another clergyman's duty, and we had a great time. Mrs. White remains the same; White is amusingly unpredictable in his moods. Talfourd is coming down next Tuesday, and we’re thinking of going over to Ryde on Monday, visiting the play, staying overnight (I don't mean at the play), and bringing the Judge back with us. Browne is coming down when he finishes his month of work. Would you like to go to Alum Bay while you’re here? It would mean spending a night out, but I think it would be really enjoyable; and if you agree, I’ll plan it secretly so we won’t be, like Bobadil, 'overwhelmed by numbers.' I plan to take a cab from Shanklin to meet you at Ryde, so we can walk back from Shanklin over the landslide, where the scenery is incredibly beautiful. Stone and Egg are coming next month, and we hope to see Jerrold before we leave." Such details from his[431] letters might not seem worth keeping; however, they contribute to a vivid picture of his remarkable energy in every situation, as long as life remained in any form for the writer. This picture wouldn't be complete without noting that, although he cherished the abundance and variety of experiences in the intervals of his work, those quieter hours of reflection and conversation, which weren't possible when "overwhelmed by numbers," were equally essential to him.
My visit was due at the opening of September, but a few days earlier came the full revelation of which only a passing shadow had reached in two or three previous letters. "Before I think of beginning my next number, I perhaps cannot do better than give you an imperfect description of the results of the climate of Bonchurch after a few weeks' residence. The first salubrious effect of which the Patient becomes conscious is an almost continual feeling of sickness, accompanied with great prostration of strength, so that his legs tremble under him, and his arms quiver when he wants to take hold of any object. An extraordinary disposition to sleep (except at night, when his rest, in the event of his having any, is broken by incessant dreams) is always present at the same time; and, if he have anything to do requiring thought and attention, this overpowers him to such a degree that he can only do it in snatches: lying down on beds in the fitful intervals. Extreme depression of mind, and a disposition to shed tears from morning to night, developes itself at the same period. If the Patient happen to have been a good walker, he finds ten miles an insupportable distance; in the achievement of which his legs are so unsteady,[432] that he goes from side to side of the road, like a drunken man. If he happen to have ever possessed any energy of any kind, he finds it quenched in a dull, stupid languor. He has no purpose, power, or object in existence whatever. When he brushes his hair in the morning, he is so weak that he is obliged to sit upon a chair to do it. He is incapable of reading, at all times. And his bilious system is so utterly overthrown, that a ball of boiling fat appears to be always behind the top of the bridge of his nose, simmering between his haggard eyes. If he should have caught a cold, he will find it impossible to get rid of it, as his system is wholly incapable of making any effort. His cough will be deep, monotonous, and constant. 'The faithful watch-dog's honest bark' will be nothing to it. He will abandon all present idea of overcoming it, and will content himself with keeping an eye upon his blood-vessels to preserve them whole and sound. Patient's name, Inimitable B. . . . It's a mortal mistake!—That's the plain fact. Of all the places I ever have been in, I have never been in one so difficult to exist in, pleasantly. Naples is hot and dirty, New York feverish, Washington bilious, Genoa exciting, Paris rainy—but Bonchurch, smashing. I am quite convinced that I should die here, in a year. It's not hot, it's not close, I don't know what it is, but the prostration of it is awful. Nobody here has the least idea what I think of it; but I find, from all sorts of hints from Kate, Georgina, and the Leeches, that they are all affected more or less in the same way, and find it very difficult to make head against. I make no sign, and pretend not to know what is going on.[433] But they are right. I believe the Leeches will go soon, and small blame to 'em!—For me, when I leave here at the end of this September, I must go down to some cold place; as Ramsgate for example, for a week or two; or I seriously believe I shall feel the effects of it for a long time. . . . What do you think of that? . . . The longer I live, the more I doubt the doctors. I am perfectly convinced, that, for people suffering under a wasting disease, this Undercliff is madness altogether. The doctors, with the old miserable folly of looking at one bit of a subject, take the patient's lungs and the Undercliff's air, and settle solemnly that they are fit for each other. But the whole influence of the place, never taken into consideration, is to reduce and overpower vitality. I am quite confident that I should go down under it, as if it were so much lead, slowly crushing me. An American resident in Paris many years, who brought me a letter from Olliffe, said, the day before yesterday, that he had always had a passion for the sea never to be gratified enough, but that after living here a month, he could not bear to look at it; he couldn't endure the sound of it; he didn't know how it was, but it seemed associated with the decay of his whole powers." These were grave imputations against one of the prettiest places in England; but of the generally depressing influence of that Undercliff on particular temperaments, I had already enough experience to abate something of the surprise with which I read the letter. What it too bluntly puts aside are the sufferings other than his own, projected and sheltered by what only aggravated his; but my visit gave me proof that he had really very[434] little overstated the effect upon himself. Making allowance, which sometimes he failed to do, for special peculiarities, and for the excitability never absent when he had in hand an undertaking such as Copperfield, I observed a nervous tendency to misgivings and apprehensions to the last degree unusual with him, which seemed to make the commonest things difficult; and though he stayed out his time, and brought away nothing that his happier associations with the place and its residents did not long survive, he never returned to Bonchurch.
My visit was scheduled for early September, but a few days before that, I got the full scoop on something that had only been hinted at in two or three previous letters. "Before I start on my next piece, I might as well give you an imperfect rundown of the effects of the climate in Bonchurch after a few weeks of staying there. The first noticeable effect for the Patient is an almost constant feeling of nausea, accompanied by extreme fatigue, making his legs shake and his arms quiver when he tries to grab something. An unusual desire to sleep (except at night, when his rest—if he gets any—is interrupted by constant dreams) is always present. If he has to do anything that requires focus, this overwhelming fatigue means he can only manage it in short bursts, often lying down on beds during those brief breaks. He also experiences severe depression and a tendency to cry from morning till night during this time. If the Patient was a decent walker before, he finds ten miles unbearable; his legs are so shaky that he weaves back and forth on the road like a drunk. If he ever had any kind of energy, he finds it completely drained away in a dull, heavy lethargy. He feels purposeless, powerless, and has no objective in life. When he brushes his hair in the morning, he’s so weak that he has to sit down to do it. He is unable to read at any time. His digestive system is so messed up that it feels like a ball of boiling fat is constantly simmering behind the bridge of his nose, between his haggard eyes. If he catches a cold, he’ll find it impossible to shake it off as his body can’t make any effort. His cough will be deep, monotonous, and constant. 'The faithful watch-dog's honest bark' won’t hold a candle to it. He will abandon any hope of getting better and will focus on just keeping his blood vessels intact. Patient's name, Inimitable B. . . . It’s a serious mistake!—That’s the simple truth. Of all the places I’ve ever been, I’ve never been anywhere that makes it so hard to live comfortably. Naples is hot and dirty, New York is feverish, Washington is full of bile, Genoa is stimulating, Paris is rainy—but Bonchurch is crushing. I’m pretty sure I would die here within a year. It’s not hot; it’s not humid; I don’t even know what it is, but the exhaustion of it is awful. Nobody here has a clue what I think about it, but from various hints dropped by Kate, Georgina, and the Leeches, I can tell they’re all affected in a similar way and are struggling to cope. I make no indication of my feelings and pretend to be oblivious to what’s happening. [433] But they’re right. I believe the Leeches will leave soon, and I can’t blame them!—As for me, when I leave here at the end of September, I need to head to a colder place, like Ramsgate for a week or two; otherwise, I truly believe I’ll feel the effects for a long time. . . . What do you think of that? . . . The longer I live, the more I question doctors. I’m completely convinced that for people dealing with a wasting illness, this Undercliff is pure madness. The doctors, with their old silly way of focusing on just one aspect of the situation, look at the Patient’s lungs and the Undercliff air, then seriously declare they’re a good match. But they completely overlook the overall impact of the place, which is to diminish and crush vitality. I’m certain that I’d end up sinking under its weight, like being crushed by lead. An American who lived in Paris for many years and brought me a letter from Olliffe mentioned just the other day that he’d always had an unfulfilled passion for the sea, but after living here for a month, he couldn’t stand to look at it; he couldn’t bear the sound of it. He didn’t know why, but it felt like it was tied to the decline of all his abilities." These were serious accusations about one of the prettiest places in England, but based on my experiences, I had already witnessed enough of the generally depressing impact of the Undercliff on certain temperaments to be somewhat unsurprised by the letter. What it too bluntly ignores are the struggles of others, overshadowed and heightened by his own; but my visit confirmed that he hadn’t overstated the effect on himself. Allowing for his unique quirks, and the nervous energy that’s always present when he’s engaged in work like Copperfield, I noted an unusual tendency toward anxiety and dread that made even the simplest tasks seem challenging; and although he stayed through his time and left with memories of good times with the place and its people that lingered, he never returned to Bonchurch. [434]
In the month that remained he completed his fifth number, and with the proof there came the reply to some questions of which I hardly remember more than that they referred to doubts of mine; one being as to the propriety of the kind of delusion he had first given to poor Mr. Dick,[155] which I thought a little too farcical for that really touching delineation of character. "Your suggestion is perfectly wise and sound," he wrote back (22nd of August). "I have acted on it. I have also, instead of the bull and china-shop delusion, given Dick the idea, that, when the head of king Charles the First was cut off, some of the trouble was taken out of it, and put into his (Dick's)". When he[435] next wrote, there was news very welcome to me for the pleasure to himself it involved. "Browne has sketched an uncommonly characteristic and capital Mr. Micawber for the next number. I hope the present number is a good one. I hear nothing but pleasant accounts of the general satisfaction." The same letter told me of an intention to go to Broadstairs, put aside by doubtful reports of its sanitary condition; but it will be seen presently that there was another graver interruption. With his work well off his hands, however, he had been getting on better where he was; and they had all been very merry. "Yes," he said, writing after a couple of days (23rd of September), "we have been sufficiently rollicking since I finished the number; and have had great games at rounders every afternoon, with all Bonchurch looking on; but I begin to long for a little peace and solitude. And now for my less pleasing piece of news. The sea has been running very high, and Leech, while bathing, was knocked over by a bad blow from a great wave on the forehead. He is in bed, and had twenty of his namesakes on his temples this morning. When I heard of him just now, he was asleep—which he had not been all night." He closed his letter hopefully, but next day (24th September) I had less favourable report. "Leech has been very ill with congestion of the brain ever since I wrote, and being still in excessive pain has had ice to his head continuously, and been bled in the arm besides. Beard and I sat up there, all night." On the 26th he wrote, "My plans are all unsettled by Leech's illness; as of course I do not like to leave this place while I can be of any service to him and his good little wife. But all[436] visitors are gone to-day, and Winterbourne once more left to the engaging family of the inimitable B. Ever since I wrote to you Leech has been seriously worse, and again very heavily bled. The night before last he was in such an alarming state of restlessness, which nothing could relieve, that I proposed to Mrs. Leech to try magnetism. Accordingly, in the middle of the night I fell to; and after a very fatiguing bout of it, put him to sleep for an hour and thirty-five minutes. A change came on in the sleep, and he is decidedly better. I talked to the astounded little Mrs. Leech across him, when he was asleep, as if he had been a truss of hay. . . . What do you think of my setting up in the magnetic line with a large brass plate? 'Terms, twenty-five guineas per nap.'" When he wrote again on the 30th, he had completed his sixth number; and his friend was so clearly on the way to recovery that he was next day to leave for Broadstairs with his wife, her sister, and the two little girls. "I will merely add that I entreat to be kindly remembered to Thackeray" (who had a dangerous illness at this time); "that I think I have, without a doubt, got the Periodical notion; and that I am writing under the depressing and discomforting influence of paying off the tribe of bills that pour in upon an unfortunate family-young-man on the eve of a residence like this. So no more at present from the disgusted, though still inimitable, and always affectionate B."
In the remaining month, he finished his fifth edition, and along with the proof, I got answers to some questions that I barely remember, other than they were about my doubts; one was about whether the type of delusion he originally assigned to poor Mr. Dick was appropriate, which I thought was a bit too ridiculous for such a genuinely touching character portrayal. "Your suggestion is completely reasonable and wise," he replied back (August 22nd). "I’ve taken your advice. Instead of the bull-in-a-china-shop delusion, I’ve given Dick the idea that when King Charles the First was beheaded, some of the burden was taken out of it and put into his (Dick's)." When he wrote again, there was news that made me very happy because of the joy it brought him. "Browne has sketched a remarkably characterful and excellent Mr. Micawber for the next issue. I hope the current issue is a good one. I’m only hearing positive feedback about the general satisfaction." The same letter mentioned a plan to visit Broadstairs, which was put off due to uncertain reports about its health conditions; however, there would soon be a more serious interruption. With his work mostly behind him, he was doing better where he was, and they had all been quite cheerful. "Yes," he wrote after a couple of days (September 23rd), "we’ve had quite a lot of fun since I finished the edition; we’ve been playing rounders every afternoon, with all of Bonchurch watching; but I’m starting to crave a bit of peace and solitude. And now for my less cheerful news. The sea has been quite rough, and Leech, while swimming, was hit hard in the forehead by a big wave. He’s in bed and had twenty ice packs on his temples this morning. When I heard about him just now, he was asleep—which he hadn’t been all night." He closed his letter with hope, but the next day (September 24th) I received a less favorable update. "Leech has been very ill with congestion in the brain since I wrote and, still in great pain, has had ice on his head continuously and has also been bled in the arm. Beard and I stayed up there all night." On the 26th, he wrote, "My plans are all up in the air due to Leech's illness; of course, I don’t want to leave this place while I can still be of help to him and his good little wife. But all visitors have gone today, and Winterbourne is once again left to the delightful family of the inimitable B. Ever since I wrote to you, Leech has gotten considerably worse and has been bled heavily again. The night before last, he was in such an alarming state of restlessness that nothing could ease it, that I suggested to Mrs. Leech trying magnetism. So, in the middle of the night, I went ahead with it; and after a very tiring session, I got him to sleep for an hour and thirty-five minutes. He had a noticeable change in his sleep, and he’s definitely better. I spoke to the astonished little Mrs. Leech across him while he was asleep as if he were just a bundle of hay. What do you think about my starting a magnetic practice with a big brass plate? 'Rates: twenty-five guineas per nap.'" When he wrote again on the 30th, he had completed his sixth edition; and his friend was clearly on the mend since he was going to leave for Broadstairs the next day with his wife, her sister, and the two little girls. "I’ll just add that I ask you to kindly remember me to Thackeray" (who was seriously ill at this time); "that I believe I have, without a doubt, got the Periodical idea; and that I’m writing under the depressing and uncomfortable pressure of trying to settle all the bills that pile up on a young man on the brink of moving into a place like this. So nothing more for now from the disgusted, yet still inimitable, and always affectionate B."
He stayed at Broadstairs till he had finished his number seven, and what else chiefly occupied him were thoughts about the Periodical of which account will presently be given. "Such a night and day of rain," ran his first letter, "I should think the oldest inhabitant[437] never saw! and yet, in the ould formiliar Broadstairs, I somehow or other don't mind it much. The change has done Mamey a world of good, and I have begun to sleep again. As for news, you might as well ask me for dolphins. Nobody in Broadstairs—to speak of. Certainly nobody in Ballard's. We are in the part, which is the house next door to the hotel itself, that we once had for three years running, and just as quiet and snug now as it was then. I don't think I shall return before the 20th or so, when the number is done; but I may, in some inconstant freak, run up to you before. Preliminary despatches and advices shall be forwarded in any case to the fragrant neighbourhood of Clare-market and the Portugal-street burying-ground." Such was his polite designation of my whereabouts: for which nevertheless he had secret likings. "On the Portsmouth railway, coming here, encountered Kenyon. On the ditto ditto at Reigate, encountered young Dilke, and took him in tow to Canterbury. On the ditto ditto at ditto (meaning Reigate), encountered Fox, M. P. for Oldham, and his daughter. All within an hour. Young Dilke great about the proposed Exposition under the direction of H. R. H. Prince Albert, and evincing, very pleasantly to me, unbounded faith in our old friend his father." There was one more letter, taking a rather gloomy view of public affairs in connection with an inflated pastoral from Doctor Wiseman "given out of the Flaminian Gate," and speaking dolefully of some family matters; which was subscribed, each word forming a separate line, "Yours Despondently, And Disgustedly, Wilkins Micawber."[438]
He stayed in Broadstairs until he finished his number seven, and what occupied his thoughts the most was the Periodical, about which more will be shared soon. "What a night and day of rain," began his first letter, "I’d think even the oldest inhabitant[437] has never seen anything like it! Yet, in the familiar old Broadstairs, I somehow don’t mind it much. The change has done Mamey a lot of good, and I’ve started to sleep again. As for news, asking me for it is like asking for dolphins. There’s hardly anyone in Broadstairs—at least no one worth mentioning. Certainly nobody at Ballard's. We’re in the part of the house right next to the hotel itself, the one we used for three years straight, and it’s just as quiet and cozy now as it was then. I don’t think I’ll be back before the 20th or so when the number is finished; but I might, in some sudden whim, come up to see you before then. Preliminary updates and news will definitely be sent to the pleasant neighborhood of Clare-market and the Portugal-street cemetery." That was his polite way of referring to where I was, even though he had a secret fondness for it. "On the Portsmouth railway, coming here, I ran into Kenyon. On the same route at Reigate, I met young Dilke and brought him along to Canterbury. On the same route at Reigate again, I saw Fox, the M.P. for Oldham, and his daughter. All in less than an hour. Young Dilke was excited about the proposed Exposition under the direction of H.R.H. Prince Albert and expressed, very pleasantly to me, endless faith in our old friend, his father." There was one more letter, which had a rather gloomy take on public affairs in connection with an inflated sermon from Doctor Wiseman "given out of the Flaminian Gate," and it spoke sadly about some family issues; it was signed, each word on a separate line, "Yours Despondently, And Disgustedly, Wilkins Micawber."[438]
His visit to the little watering-place in the following year was signalised by his completion of the most famous of his novels, and his letters otherwise were occupied by elaborate managerial preparation for the private performances at Knebworth. But again the plague of itinerant music flung him into such fevers of irritation, that he finally resolved against any renewed attempt to carry on important work here; and the summer of 1851, when he was only busy with miscellaneous writing, was the last of his regular residences in the place. He then let his London house for the brief remainder of its term; ran away at the end of May, when some grave family sorrows had befallen him, from the crowds and excitements of the Great Exhibition; and with intervals of absence, chiefly at the Guild representations, stayed in his favourite Fort-house by the sea until October, when he took possession of Tavistock-house. From his letters may be added a few notices of this last holiday at Broadstairs, which he had always afterwards a kindly word for; and to which he said pleasant adieu in the sketch of "Our Watering-place," written shortly before he left.
His visit to the small seaside resort the following year was marked by the completion of his most famous novel, and his letters were primarily focused on detailed preparations for private performances at Knebworth. However, once again, the nuisance of traveling musicians drove him to such levels of frustration that he ultimately decided against making any further attempts to work on significant projects there. The summer of 1851, when he was only engaged in various writing, marked the end of his regular stays in the area. He then rented out his London house for the short time left on its lease; he escaped at the end of May, following some serious family troubles, from the crowds and excitement of the Great Exhibition. With breaks for Guild performances, he remained in his favorite seaside house until October, when he moved into Tavistock House. From his letters, a few details about this last holiday in Broadstairs can be added, a place he always remembered fondly, and he said a pleasant goodbye in the piece "Our Watering-place," which he wrote shortly before leaving.
"It is more delightful here" (1st of June) "than I can express. Corn growing, larks singing, garden full of flowers, fresh air on the sea—O it is wonderful! Why can't you come down next Saturday (bringing work) and go back with me on Wednesday for the Copperfield banquet? Concerning which, of course, I say yes to Talfourd's kind proposal. Lemon by all means. And—don't you think? Browne? Whosoever, besides, pleases Talfourd will please me." Great was the success of that banquet. The scene was the Star-and-Garter[439] at Richmond; Thackeray and Alfred Tennyson joined in the celebration; and the generous giver was in his best vein. I have rarely seen Dickens happier than he was amid the sunshine of that day. Jerrold and Thackeray returned to town with us; and a little argument between them about money and its uses, led to an avowal of Dickens about himself to which I may add the confirmation of all our years of intercourse. "No man," he said, "attaches less importance to the possession of money, or less disparagement to the want of it, than I do."
"It’s more delightful here" (June 1st) "than I can say. Corn is growing, larks are singing, the garden is full of flowers, and the fresh sea air—oh, it’s amazing! Why don’t you come down next Saturday (bringing work) and go back with me on Wednesday for the Copperfield banquet? Regarding which, of course, I accept Talfourd's kind invitation. Lemon, for sure. And—don’t you think? Browne? Anyone else who pleases Talfourd will please me too." The banquet was a huge success. It took place at the Star-and-Garter[439] in Richmond; Thackeray and Alfred Tennyson joined in the celebration, and the generous host was in top form. I have rarely seen Dickens happier than he was on that sunny day. Jerrold and Thackeray came back to town with us, and a little debate between them about money and its uses led to Dickens revealing something about himself that I've seen confirmed throughout all our years of friendship. "No man," he said, "places less importance on having money or looks down on not having it than I do."
Vague mention of a "next book" escaped in a letter at the end of July, on which I counselled longer abstinence. "Good advice," he replied, "but difficult: I wish you'd come to us and preach another kind of abstinence. Fancy the Preventive men finding a lot of brandy in barrels on the rocks here, the day before yesterday! Nobody knows anything about the barrels, of course. They were intended to have been landed with the next tide, and to have been just covered at low water. But the water being unusually low, the tops of the barrels became revealed to Preventive telescopes, and descent was made upon the brandy. They are always at it, hereabouts, I have no doubt. And of course B would not have had any of it. O dear no! certainly not."
A vague mention of a "next book" came up in a letter at the end of July, to which I advised waiting longer. "Good advice," he replied, "but tough: I wish you'd come visit us and talk about a different kind of abstinence. Can you imagine the Preventive guys discovering a bunch of brandy barrels on the rocks here the day before yesterday? Nobody knows anything about those barrels, of course. They were supposed to be unloaded with the next tide and just covered at low tide. But since the water was unusually low, the tops of the barrels were visible to the Preventive telescopes, and they came down on the brandy. They're always at it around here, I'm sure. And of course, B wouldn’t have had any of it. Oh no, definitely not."
His reading was considerable and very various at these intervals of labour, and in this particular summer took in all the minor tales as well as the plays of Voltaire, several of the novels (old favourites with him) of Paul de Kock, Ruskin's Lamps of Architecture, and a surprising number of books of African and other travel[440] for which he had insatiable relish: but the notices of all this in his letters were few. "By the bye, I observe, reading that wonderful book the French Revolution again, for the 500th time, that Carlyle, who knows everything, don't know what Mumbo Jumbo is. It is not an Idol. It is a secret preserved among the men of certain African tribes, and never revealed by any of them, for the punishment of their women. Mumbo Jumbo comes in hideous form out of the forest, or the mud, or the river, or where not, and flogs some woman who has been backbiting, or scolding, or with some other domestic mischief disturbing the general peace. Carlyle seems to confound him with the common Fetish; but he is quite another thing. He is a disguised man; and all about him is a freemasons' secret among the men."—"I finished the Scarlet Letter yesterday. It falls off sadly after that fine opening scene. The psychological part of the story is very much over-done, and not truly done I think. Their suddenness of meeting and agreeing to go away together, after all those years, is very poor. Mr. Chillingworth ditto. The child out of nature altogether. And Mr. Dimmisdale certainly never could have begotten her." In Mr. Hawthorne's earlier books he had taken especial pleasure; his Mosses from an Old Manse having been the first book he placed in my hands on his return from America, with reiterated injunctions to read it. I will add a word or two of what he wrote of the clever story of another popular writer, because it hits well the sort of ability that has become so common, which escapes the highest point of cleverness, but stops short only at the very verge of it. "The story extremely good indeed; but[441] all the strongest things of which it is capable, missed. It shows just how far that kind of power can go. It is more like a note of the idea than anything else. It seems to me as if it were written by somebody who lived next door to the people, rather than inside of 'em."
His reading was extensive and varied during these work breaks, and that summer he dove into all the smaller tales and plays by Voltaire, several novels by Paul de Kock—old favorites of his—Ruskin's Lamps of Architecture, and a surprising number of travel books about Africa and elsewhere, which he had an insatiable appetite for. However, he mentioned very little about these in his letters. "By the way, I noticed while reading that amazing book French Revolution again for the 500th time that Carlyle, who knows everything, doesn’t know what Mumbo Jumbo is. It's not an idol. It’s a secret kept among certain African tribes, never disclosed by any of them as a punishment for their women. Mumbo Jumbo emerges in a terrifying form from the forest, the mud, or the river, and punishes a woman for gossiping, arguing, or causing any other domestic trouble that disrupts the peace. Carlyle seems to confuse him with a common fetish, but he’s actually something entirely different. He’s a disguised man, and everything about him is a freemason's secret among the men.”—“I finished The Scarlet Letter yesterday. It falls off badly after that great opening scene. The psychological aspect of the story is overdone and not done well, I think. Their sudden meeting and decision to run away together after all those years is very weak. Mr. Chillingworth is the same. The child feels completely out of place. And Mr. Dimmesdale definitely could not have fathered her.” He especially enjoyed Mr. Hawthorne's earlier works; Mosses from an Old Manse was the first book he handed me when he returned from America, insisting I read it. I’ll add a comment on what he said about the clever story by another popular writer because it perfectly captures the type of talent that has become so common: it barely touches the highest level of cleverness, stopping just short of it. "The story is indeed extremely good, but[441] it misses all the strongest things it could have offered. It shows just how far that kind of power can reach. It’s more like a hint of the idea than anything else. It feels like it was written by someone who lived next door to the people rather than being truly part of their lives."
I joined him for the August regatta and stayed a pleasant fortnight. His paper on "Our Watering-place" appeared while I was there, and great was the local excitement. His own restlessness with fancies for a new book had now risen beyond bounds, and for the time he was eager to open it in that prettiest quaintest bit of English landscape, Strood valley, which reminded him always of a Swiss scene. I had not left him many days when these lines followed me. "I very nearly packed up a portmanteau and went away, the day before yesterday, into the mountains of Switzerland, alone! Still the victim of an intolerable restlessness, I shouldn't be at all surprised if I wrote to you one of these mornings from under Mont Blanc. I sit down between whiles to think of a new story, and, as it begins to grow, such a torment of a desire to be anywhere but where I am; and to be going I don't know where, I don't know why; takes hold of me, that it is like being driven away. If I had had a passport, I sincerely believe I should have gone to Switzerland the night before last. I should have remembered our engagement—say, at Paris, and have come back for it; but should probably have left by the next express train."
I joined him for the August regatta and stayed for a nice two weeks. His paper on "Our Watering-place" came out while I was there, and it caused quite a stir locally. His own restlessness with ideas for a new book had now reached a peak, and for the moment, he was eager to start it in that charming, quaint part of the English landscape, Strood valley, which always reminded him of a Swiss scene. It wasn't long after I left him when these lines came my way. "I almost packed a suitcase and headed off into the mountains of Switzerland, alone! Still plagued by an unbearable restlessness, I wouldn't be surprised at all if I write to you one of these mornings from under Mont Blanc. I sit down every now and then to think of a new story, and as it starts to take shape, such an overwhelming urge to be anywhere but here hits me; I feel like I’m being driven away. If I had a passport, I honestly believe I would have gone to Switzerland the night before last. I would have remembered our appointment—let's say in Paris—and come back for it, but I probably would have left on the next express train."
At the end of November, when he had settled himself in his new London abode, the book was begun; and as generally happened with the more important incidents of his life, but always accidentally, begun on a Friday.
At the end of November, when he had made himself comfortable in his new London home, he started the book; and as usually occurred with the significant events in his life, but always by chance, it began on a Friday.
CHAPTER XIX.
HAUNTED MAN AND HOUSEHOLD WORDS.
1848-1850.
It has been seen that his fancy for his Christmas book of 1848 first arose to him at Lausanne in the summer of 1846, and that, after writing its opening pages in the autumn of the following year, he laid it aside under the pressure of his Dombey. These lines were in the letter that closed his 1848 Broadstairs holiday. "At last I am a mentally matooring of the Christmas book—or, as poor Macrone[156] used to write, 'booke,'[443] 'boke,' 'buke,' &c." It was the first labour to which he applied himself at his return.
It has been noted that his interest in his Christmas book of 1848 first came to him in Lausanne during the summer of 1846, and that after writing its opening pages in the autumn of the following year, he put it aside due to the demands of his Dombey. These lines were in the letter that wrapped up his 1848 holiday in Broadstairs. "At last I am mentally preparing for the Christmas book—or, as poor Macrone[156] used to write, 'booke,'[443] 'boke,' 'buke,' etc." It was the first work he devoted himself to upon his return.
In London it soon came to maturity; was published duly as The Haunted Man, or the Ghost's Bargain; sold largely, beginning with a subscription of twenty thousand; and had a great success on the Adelphi stage, to which it was rather cleverly adapted by Lemon. He had placed on its title page originally four lines from Tennyson's "Departure,"
In London, it quickly gained popularity; it was published as The Haunted Man, or the Ghost's Bargain; sold extensively, starting with a subscription of twenty thousand; and achieved great success on the Adelphi stage, where it was skillfully adapted by Lemon. He initially included four lines from Tennyson's "Departure" on its title page,
"And o'er the hills, and far away
Beyond their deepest purple edge,
Beyond the night, through the day,
Through all the world it followed him;
The design for his much-thought-of new Periodical was still "dim," as we have seen, when the first cogitation of it at Bonchurch occupied him; but the expediency of making it clearer came soon after with a visit from Mr. Evans, who brought his half-year's accounts of sales, and some small disappointment for him in those of Copperfield. "The accounts are rather shy, after Dombey, and what you said comes true after all. I am not sorry I cannot bring myself to care much for what opinions people may form; and I have a strong belief, that, if any of my books are read years hence, Dombey will be remembered as among the best of them: but passing influences are important for the time, and as Chuzzlewit with its small sale sent me up, Dombey's large sale has tumbled me down. Not very much, however, in real truth. These accounts only include the first three numbers, have of course been burdened with all the heavy expenses of number one, and ought not in reason to be complained of. But it is clear to me that the Periodical must be set agoing in the spring; and I have already been busy, at odd half-hours, in shadowing forth a name and an idea. Evans says they have but one opinion repeated to them of Copperfield, and they feel very confident about it. A steady twenty-five thousand, which it is now on the verge of, will do[448] very well. The back numbers are always going off. Read the enclosed."
The plan for his long-anticipated new Periodical was still "fuzzy," as we have seen, when he first started thinking about it in Bonchurch. But the need to clarify things became evident soon after a visit from Mr. Evans, who brought his semi-annual sales report, along with some slight disappointment regarding Copperfield. "The sales are a bit off after Dombey, and what you mentioned has turned out to be true. I don’t regret not caring much about what others think; I firmly believe that, if any of my books are read in the future, Dombey will be remembered as one of the best. Still, current opinions matter a lot right now, and while Chuzzlewit had me riding high with its low sales, Dombey's strong sales have brought me back down. But honestly, not by much. These accounts only cover the first three issues, have inevitably been weighed down by all the hefty costs of the first issue, and shouldn’t really be complained about. However, it's clear to me that the Periodical needs to launch in the spring; I’ve already been working, during spare moments, on coming up with a name and concept. Evans says they keep hearing the same feedback about Copperfield, and they feel very optimistic about it. A steady twenty-five thousand, which we’re about to hit, will be just fine. The back issues are always selling out. Read the enclosed."
It was a letter from a Russian man of letters, dated from St. Petersburg and signed "Trinarch Ivansvitch Wredenskii," sending him a translation of Dombey into Russian; and informing him that his works, which before had only been translated in the journals, and with certain omissions, had now been translated in their entire form by his correspondent, though even he had found an omission to be necessary in his version of Pickwick. He adds, with an exquisite courtesy to our national tongue which is yet not forgetful of the claims of his own nationality, that his difficulties (in the Sam Weller direction and others) had arisen from the "impossibility of portraying faithfully the beauties of the original in the Russian language, which, though the richest in Europe in its expressiveness, is far from being elaborate enough for literature like other civilized languages." He had however, he assured Dickens, been unremitting in his efforts to live with his thoughts; and the exalted opinion he had formed of them was attended by only one wish, that such a writer "could but have expanded under a Russian sky!" Still, his fate was an enviable one. "For the last eleven years your name has enjoyed a wide celebrity in Russia, and from the banks of the Neva to the remotest parts of Siberia you are read with avidity. Your Dombey continues to inspire with enthusiasm the whole of the literary Russia." Much did we delight in the good Wredenskii; and for a long time, on anything going "contrairy" in the public or private direction with him, he would tell me he had ordered his portmanteau[449] to be packed for the more sympathizing and congenial climate of "the remotest parts of Siberia."
It was a letter from a Russian writer, dated from St. Petersburg and signed "Trinarch Ivansvitch Wredenskii," sending him a translation of Dombey into Russian. He informed him that his works, which had previously only been translated in journals and with some cuts, had now been completely translated by his correspondent, although even he found it necessary to leave something out in his version of Pickwick. He added, with great respect for our language while still honoring his own nationality, that his challenges (especially with the Sam Weller parts and others) stemmed from the "impossibility of faithfully capturing the beauties of the original in the Russian language, which, while the richest in Europe for expressiveness, is far less detailed than other civilized languages." However, he assured Dickens that he had worked tirelessly to align his thoughts with his writing. The high regard he had for those thoughts was accompanied by just one wish: that such a writer "could have flourished under a Russian sky!" Still, his fate was enviable. "For the last eleven years, your name has been widely known in Russia, and from the banks of the Neva to the far reaches of Siberia, you are read with enthusiasm. Your Dombey continues to excite the entire literary scene in Russia." We greatly enjoyed good old Wredenskii, and for a long time, whenever things went "wrong" in either his public or private life, he would tell me he had arranged for his suitcase[449] to be packed for the more understanding and friendly climate of "the farthest parts of Siberia."
The week before he left Bonchurch I again had news of the old and often recurring fancy. "The old notion of the Periodical, which has been agitating itself in my mind for so long, I really think is at last gradually growing into form." That was on the 24th of September; and on the 7th of October, from Broadstairs, I had something of the form it had been taking. "I do great injustice to my floating ideas (pretty speedily and comfortably settling down into orderly arrangement) by saying anything about the Periodical now: but my notion is a weekly journal, price either three-halfpence or two-pence, matter in part original and in part selected, and always having, if possible, a little good poetry. . . . Upon the selected matter, I have particular notions. One is, that it should always be a subject. For example, a history of Piracy; in connexion with which there is a vast deal of extraordinary, romantic, and almost unknown matter. A history of Knight-errantry, and the wild old notion of the Sangreal. A history of Savages, showing the singular respects in which all savages are like each other; and those in which civilised men, under circumstances of difficulty, soonest become like savages. A history of remarkable characters, good and bad, in history; to assist the reader's judgment in his observation of men, and in his estimates of the truth of many characters in fiction. All these things, and fifty others that I have already thought of, would be compilations; through the whole of which the general intellect and purpose of the paper should run, and in which there[450] would be scarcely less interest than in the original matter. The original matter to be essays, reviews, letters, theatrical criticisms, &c., &c., as amusing as possible, but all distinctly and boldly going to what in one's own view ought to be the spirit of the people and the time. . . . Now to bind all this together, and to get a character established as it were which any of the writers may maintain without difficulty, I want to suppose a certain Shadow, which may go into any place, by sunlight, moonlight, starlight, firelight, candlelight, and be in all homes, and all nooks and corners, and be supposed to be cognisant of everything, and go everywhere, without the least difficulty. Which may be in the Theatre, the Palace, the House of Commons, the Prisons, the Unions, the Churches, on the Railroad, on the Sea, abroad and at home: a kind of semi-omniscient, omnipresent, intangible creature. I don't think it would do to call the paper The Shadow: but I want something tacked to that title, to express the notion of its being a cheerful, useful, and always welcome Shadow. I want to open the first number with this Shadow's account of himself and his family. I want to have all the correspondence addressed to him. I want him to issue his warnings from time to time, that he is going to fall on such and such a subject; or to expose such and such a piece of humbug; or that he may be expected shortly in such and such a place. I want the compiled part of the paper to express the idea of this Shadow's having been in libraries, and among the books referred to. I want him to loom as a fanciful thing all over London; and to get up a general notion of 'What will the Shadow[451] say about this, I wonder? What will the Shadow say about that? Is the Shadow here?' and so forth. Do you understand? . . . I have an enormous difficulty in expressing what I mean, in this stage of the business; but I think the importance of the idea is, that once stated on paper, there is no difficulty in keeping it up. That it presents an odd, unsubstantial, whimsical, new thing: a sort of previously unthought-of Power going about. That it will concentrate into one focus all that is done in the paper. That it sets up a creature which isn't the Spectator, and isn't Isaac Bickerstaff, and isn't anything of that kind: but in which people will be perfectly willing to believe, and which is just mysterious and quaint enough to have a sort of charm for their imagination, while it will represent common-sense and humanity. I want to express in the title, and in the grasp of the idea to express also, that it is the Thing at everybody's elbow, and in everybody's footsteps. At the window, by the fire, in the street, in the house, from infancy to old age, everyone's inseparable companion. . . . Now do you make anything out of this? which I let off as if I were a bladder full of it, and you had punctured me. I have not breathed the idea to any one; but I have a lively hope that it is an idea, and that out of it the whole scheme may be hammered."
The week before he left Bonchurch, I got news about the old idea that keeps coming back to me. "The old concept of the Periodical that has been stirring in my mind for so long is finally starting to take shape." That was on September 24th; and on October 7th, from Broadstairs, I had a sense of what that shape might be. "I do a great disservice to my evolving ideas (which are quickly and comfortably organizing themselves) by mentioning the Periodical now: but my idea is a weekly journal, priced either three-halfpence or two-pence, with content that is partly original and partly selected, always including, if possible, a little good poetry. . . . I have specific ideas about the selected content. One is that it should always be a subject. For instance, a history of Piracy, which has a ton of extraordinary, romantic, and nearly unknown information. A history of Knight-errantry and the old legends of the Sangreal. A history of Savages that highlights the unique ways all savages are alike; and how civilized people, when faced with difficulties, quickly start to resemble savages. A history of notable characters, both good and bad, in history; to help readers assess the people around them and evaluate the truth of many fictional characters. All these topics, and countless others I’ve already considered, would be compilations; throughout which the overall intellect and purpose of the paper would flow, providing just as much interest as the original content. The original material would consist of essays, reviews, letters, theater critiques, etc., as entertaining as possible, all clearly aimed at what should represent the spirit of the people and the time. . . . To tie all this together and establish a character that any of the writers can easily maintain, I envision a certain Shadow that can go anywhere, by sunlight, moonlight, starlight, firelight, candlelight, and be present in all homes and hidden corners, and be perceived as knowing everything, moving everywhere without any trouble. This could be in the Theater, the Palace, the House of Commons, prisons, Unions, Churches, on the Railroad, on the Sea, both at home and abroad: a sort of semi-omniscient, omnipresent, intangible being. I don’t think it would work to call the paper The Shadow: but I want something attached to that title to convey the idea of it being a cheerful, useful, and always welcome Shadow. I want to kick off the first issue with this Shadow's account of himself and his family. I want all correspondence to be directed to him. I want him to give warnings from time to time that he’s going to tackle this or that subject; or to reveal some nonsense; or that he’ll be appearing soon in certain places. I want the compiled part of the paper to reflect this Shadow's presence in libraries and among reference books. I want him to loom majestically throughout London; and to generate a general curiosity of 'What will the Shadow[451] say about this, I wonder? What will the Shadow say about that? Is the Shadow here?' and so forth. Do you get it? . . . I have a tremendous challenge expressing what I mean at this stage of the project; but I think the significance of the idea is that once it’s written down, there's no difficulty in sustaining it. It presents an odd, insubstantial, whimsical, new concept: a sort of previously unthought-of Power wandering around. It will focus everything done in the paper. It establishes a character that isn’t the Spectator, nor Isaac Bickerstaff, or anything like that: but one that people will be completely willing to believe in, which is just mysterious and quirky enough to enchant their imagination, while also representing common sense and humanity. I want the title and the grasp of the idea to convey that it’s the Thing at everybody's side, and in everybody's footsteps. By the window, by the fire, in the street, in the house, from infancy to old age, everyone's constant companion. . . . Now, do you make anything out of this? I let it out like a bladder full of air, and you’ve punctured me. I haven’t shared the idea with anyone; but I have high hopes that it is a good idea, and that from it, the whole plan can be crafted."
Excellent the idea doubtless, and so described in his letter that hardly anything more characteristic survives him. But I could not make anything out of it that had a quite feasible look. The ordinary ground of miscellaneous reading, selection, and compilation out of which it was to spring, seemed to me no proper soil[452] for the imaginative produce it was meant to bear. As his fancies grew and gathered round it, they had given it too much of the range and scope of his own exhaustless land of invention and marvel; and the very means proposed for letting in the help of others would only more heavily have weighted himself. Not to trouble the reader now with objections given him in detail, my judgment was clear against his plan; less for any doubt of the effect if its parts could be brought to combine, than for my belief that it was not in that view practicable; and though he did not immediately accept my reasons, he acquiesced in them ultimately. "I do not lay much stress on your grave doubts about Periodical, but more anon." The more anon resolved itself into conversations out of which the shape given to the project was that which it finally took.
The idea was excellent, as he described in his letter, but hardly anything more typical remains of him. However, I couldn't see it as something practical. The usual mix of readings, selections, and compilations from which it was meant to emerge didn’t seem like the right foundation for the imaginative work it was supposed to create. As his ideas developed and built around it, they took on too much of the vastness and creativity of his limitless imagination; and the very ways proposed to invite others' help would have only added more burden to himself. Without getting into detailed objections, I was clear in my judgment against his plan; it wasn't because I doubted the effect of combining its parts, but rather because I believed it wasn't feasible in that way; and even though he didn't immediately accept my reasons, he eventually came to agree. "I don’t put much weight on your serious concerns about Periodical, but more on that later." That "more on that later" turned into discussions that shaped the project into what it ultimately became.
It was to be a weekly miscellany of general literature; and its stated objects were to be, to contribute to the entertainment and instruction of all classes of readers, and to help in the discussion of the more important social questions of the time. It was to comprise short stories by others as well as himself; matters of passing interest in the liveliest form that could be given to them; subjects suggested by books that might most be attracting attention; and poetry in every number if possible, but in any case something of romantic fancy. This was to be a cardinal point. There was to be no mere utilitarian spirit; with all familiar things, but especially those repellent on the surface, something was to be connected that should be fanciful or kindly; and the hardest workers were to be taught that their lot is not necessarily excluded from the sympathies[453] and graces of imagination. This was all finally settled by the close of 1849, when a general announcement of the intended adventure was made. There remained only a title and an assistant editor; and I am happy now to remember that for the latter important duty Mr. Wills was chosen at my suggestion. He discharged his duties with admirable patience and ability for twenty years, and Dickens's later life had no more intimate friend.
It was meant to be a weekly collection of general literature, aiming to entertain and educate readers of all kinds, while also engaging in discussions about important social issues of the time. It was set to include short stories by various authors as well as himself, current topics presented in the most engaging way possible, subjects inspired by popular books, and ideally, poetry in every issue, along with something imaginative. This was a key aspect. There would be no purely practical approach; even in familiar subjects, especially those that seem unappealing at first glance, there would be a connection to something imaginative or kind. The hardest workers were to be reminded that their lives could also include the support and beauty of creativity. By the end of 1849, everything was finalized, and a public announcement was made about the upcoming venture. All that was left was to choose a title and an assistant editor; I’m pleased to recall that I suggested Mr. Wills for the latter role. He served with remarkable patience and skill for twenty years, and Dickens's later life had no closer friend.
The title took some time and occupied many letters. One of the first thought-of has now the curious interest of having foreshadowed, by the motto proposed to accompany it, the title of the series of All the Year Round which he was led to substitute for the older series in 1859. "The Robin. With this motto from Goldsmith. 'The redbreast, celebrated for its affection to mankind, continues with us, the year round.'" That however was rejected. Then came: "Mankind. This I think very good." It followed the other nevertheless. After it came: "And here a strange idea, but with decided advantages. 'Charles Dickens. A weekly journal designed for the instruction and entertainment of all classes of readers. Conducted by Himself.'" Still, there was something wanting in that also. Next day arrived: "I really think if there be anything wanting in the other name, that this is very pretty, and just supplies it. The Household Voice. I have thought of many others, as—The Household Guest. The Household Face. The Comrade. The Microscope. The Highway Of Life. The Lever. The Rolling Years. The Holly Tree (with two lines from Southey for a[454] motto). Everything, But I rather think the Voice is it." It was near indeed; but the following day came, "Household Words. This is a very pretty name:" and the choice was made.
The title took some time and involved many letters. One of the initial ideas now has the interesting distinction of having hinted at the motto meant to go with it, which later became the title of the series All the Year Round, substituting the previous series in 1859. "The Robinbird. With this motto from Goldsmith: 'The redbreast, noted for its affection to mankind, stays with us all year round.'" However, that was rejected. Then came: "Humankind. I think this is quite good." Nonetheless, it followed the other option. Next was: "And here’s a strange idea, but it has its merits. 'Charles Dickens. A weekly journal aimed at the education and entertainment of all types of readers. Conducted by Him.'" Still, something was missing in that too. The next day brought: "I really believe if there’s anything lacking in the other name, this one is very nice and just fills the gap: The Home Voice. I’ve thought of many others, like—The Household Guest. The Family Member. The Friend. The Microscope. The Journey of Life. The Lever. The Passing Years. The Holly Tree. (with two lines from Southey for a[454] motto). Everything, but I think Voice fits best." It was quite close; but the following day came, "Familiar Phrases. This is a very nice name:" and that settled the choice.
The first number appeared on Saturday the 30th of March 1850, and contained among other things the beginning of a story by a very original writer, Mrs. Gaskell, for whose powers he had a high admiration, and with whom he had friendly intercourse during many years. Other opportunities will arise for mention of those with whom this new labour brought him into personal communication, but I may at once say that of all the writers, before unknown, whom his journal helped to make familiar to a wide world of readers, he had the strongest personal interest in Mr. Sala, and placed at once in the highest rank his capabilities of help in such an enterprise.[157] An illustrative trait of what I have named as its cardinal point to him will fitly close my account of its establishment. Its first number, still unpublished, had not seemed to him quite to fulfil his promise, "tenderly to cherish the light of fancy inherent in all breasts;" and, as[455] soon as he received the proof of the second, I heard from him. "Looking over the suggested contents of number two at breakfast this morning" (Brighton: 14th of March 1850) "I felt an uneasy sense of there being a want of something tender, which would apply to some universal household knowledge. Coming down in the railroad the other night (always a wonderfully suggestive place to me when I am alone) I was looking at the stars, and revolving a little idea about them. Putting now these two things together, I wrote the enclosed little paper, straightway; and should like you to read it before you send it to the printers (it will not take you five minutes), and let me have a proof by return." This was the child's "dream of a star," which opened his second number; and, not appearing among his reprinted pieces, may justify a word or two of description. It is of a brother and sister, constant child-companions, who used to make friends of a star, watching it together until they knew when and where it would rise, and always bidding it good-night; so that when the sister dies the lonely brother still connects her with the star, which he then sees opening as a world of light, and its rays making a shining pathway from earth to heaven; and he also sees angels waiting to receive travellers up that sparkling road, his little sister among them; and he thinks ever after that he belongs less to the earth than to the star where his sister is; and he grows up to youth and through manhood and old age, consoled still under the successive domestic bereavements that fall to his earthly lot by renewal of that vision of his childhood; until at last, lying on his own bed of death, he feels that he is moving as a child to[456] his child-sister, and he thanks his heavenly father that the star had so often opened before to receive the dear ones who awaited him.
The first issue was released on Saturday, March 30, 1850, and featured, among other things, the beginning of a story by a very unique writer, Mrs. Gaskell, whose talent he greatly admired and with whom he had a friendly relationship for many years. There will be other chances to mention those with whom this new venture brought him into contact, but I can say right away that of all the writers, previously unknown, whom his journal helped to introduce to a broad audience of readers, he was particularly interested in Mr. Sala and immediately recognized his strong potential to contribute to such an endeavor.[157] An illustrative trait of what I’ve identified as its main point will appropriately conclude my account of its establishment. The first issue, which was still unpublished, did not seem to him to fully meet his promise, "to gently nurture the spark of imagination inherent in everyone;" and as[455] soon as he received the proof for the second issue, I heard from him. "While reviewing the proposed contents of issue two at breakfast this morning" (Brighton: March 14, 1850) "I felt a nagging sense that something tender was missing, something that would resonate with universal home truths. Coming down the railroad the other night (always a wonderfully inspiring place for me when I'm alone), I was gazing at the stars and contemplating a little idea about them. Now combining those two thoughts, I wrote the enclosed little piece right away; I’d like you to read it before you send it to the printers (it won’t take you five minutes), and please send me a proof as soon as possible." This was the child's "dream of a star," which opened his second issue and, not being included in his reprinted works, may warrant a brief description. It tells the story of a brother and sister, constant childhood companions, who made friends with a star, watching it together until they knew when and where it would rise, always bidding it goodnight. So when the sister dies, the lonely brother still connects her to the star he sees shining brightly as a world of light, its rays forming a glowing path from earth to heaven; he also sees angels waiting to welcome travelers along that sparkling road, his little sister among them. He then believes that he belongs less to the earth than to the star where his sister is, and he grows up through youth, manhood, and old age, still comforted by that vision from his childhood, even as he faces the successive losses that life brings. Finally, lying on his deathbed, he feels himself moving like a child toward his sister, and he thanks his heavenly Father that the star has often opened to receive the loved ones who are waiting for him.
His sister Fanny and himself, he told me long before this paper was written, used to wander at night about a churchyard near their house, looking up at the stars; and her early death, of which I am now to speak, had vividly reawakened all the childish associations which made her memory dear to him.
His sister Fanny and he, he told me long before this paper was written, used to stroll at night around a churchyard near their house, looking up at the stars; and her early death, which I am now going to discuss, had strongly brought back all the childhood memories that made her memory precious to him.
CHAPTER XX.
LAST YEARS IN DEVONSHIRE TERRACE.
1848-1851.
Excepting always the haunts and associations of his childhood, Dickens had no particular sentiment of locality, and any special regard for houses he had lived in was not a thing noticeable in him. But he cared most for Devonshire-terrace, perhaps for the bit of ground attached to it; and it was with regret he suddenly[458] discovered, at the close of 1847, that he should have to resign it "next lady-day three years. I had thought the lease two years more." To that brief remaining time belong some incidents of which I have still to give account; and I connect them with the house in which he lived during the progress of what is generally thought his greatest book, and of what I think were his happiest years.
Aside from the places and memories of his childhood, Dickens didn't have a strong attachment to specific locations, and he didn't really show much sentimental value for the houses he had lived in. However, he had a particular fondness for Devonshire-terrace, possibly because of the small piece of land that came with it; he felt a sense of loss when he discovered at the end of 1847 that he would have to give it up "next lady-day three years. I had thought the lease two years more." Some events that belong to that short time frame are still to be discussed; I link them with the house he lived in while working on what is widely considered his greatest book and what I believe were his happiest years.
We had never had such intimate confidences as in the interval since his return from Paris; but these have been used in my narrative of the childhood and boyish experiences, and what remain are incidental only. Of the fragment of autobiography there also given, the origin has been told; but the intention of leaving such a record had been in his mind, we now see, at an earlier date; and it was the very depth of our interest in the opening of his fragment that led to the larger design in which it became absorbed. "I hardly know why I write this," was his own comment on one of his personal revelations, "but the more than friendship which has grown between us seems to force it on me in my present mood. We shall speak of it all, you and I, Heaven grant, wisely and wonderingly many and many a time in after years. In the meanwhile I am more at rest for having opened all my heart and mind to you. . . . This day eleven years, poor dear Mary died."[158]
We had never shared such deep confessions as we did during the time since his return from Paris; but I've included those in my story about childhood and youthful experiences, and what’s left is mostly just incidental. The background of the autobiography fragment I shared has already been explained; however, it’s clear now that he had the idea of leaving such a record in mind much earlier. Our deep interest in the beginning of his fragment prompted the larger purpose into which it merged. “I’m not sure why I’m writing this,” was his remark on one of his personal disclosures, “but the deeper bond that has developed between us seems to compel me to do so in my current mood. We’ll discuss all of this, you and I, hopefully with wisdom and wonder many times in the years to come. For now, I feel more at peace having opened my heart and mind to you... Today marks eleven years since poor dear Mary passed away.”[158]
That was written on the seventh of May 1848, but[459] another sadness impending at the time was taking his thoughts still farther back; to when he trotted about with his little elder sister in the small garden to the house at Portsea. The faint hope for her which Elliotson had given him in Paris had since completely broken down; and I was to hear, in less than two months after the letter just quoted, how nearly the end was come. "A change took place in poor Fanny," he wrote on the 5th of July, "about the middle of the day yesterday, which took me out there last night. Her cough suddenly ceased almost, and, strange to say, she immediately became aware of her hopeless state; to which she resigned herself, after an hour's unrest and struggle, with extraordinary sweetness and constancy. The irritability passed, and all hope faded away; though only two nights before, she had been planning for 'after Christmas.' She is greatly changed. I had a long interview with her to-day, alone; and when she had expressed some wishes about the funeral, and her being buried in unconsecrated ground" (Mr. Burnett's family were dissenters), "I asked her whether she had any care or anxiety in the world. She said No, none. It was hard to die at such a time of life, but she had no alarm whatever in the prospect of the change; felt sure we should meet again in a better world; and although they had said she might rally for a time, did not really wish it. She said she was quite calm and happy, relied upon the mediation of Christ, and had no terror at all. She had worked very hard, even when ill; but believed that was in her nature, and neither regretted nor complained of it. Burnett had been always very good to her; they had never quarrelled;[460] she was sorry to think of his going back to such a lonely home; and was distressed about her children, but not painfully so. She showed me how thin and worn she was; spoke about an invention she had heard of that she would like to have tried, for the deformed child's back; called to my remembrance all our sister Letitia's patience and steadiness; and, though she shed tears sometimes, clearly impressed upon me that her mind was made up, and at rest. I asked her very often, if she could ever recall anything that she could leave to my doing, to put it down, or mention it to somebody if I was not there; and she said she would, but she firmly believed that there was nothing—nothing. Her husband being young, she said, and her children infants, she could not help thinking sometimes, that it would be very long in the course of nature before they were reunited; but she knew that was a mere human fancy, and could have no reality after she was dead. Such an affecting exhibition of strength and tenderness, in all that early decay, is quite indescribable. I need not tell you how it moved me. I cannot look round upon the dear children here, without some misgiving that this sad disease will not perish out of our blood with her; but I am sure I have no selfishness in the thought, and God knows how small the world looks to one who comes out of such a sick-room on a bright summer day. I don't know why I write this before going to bed. I only know that in the very pity and grief of my heart, I feel as if it were doing something." After not many weeks she died, and the little child who was her last anxiety did not long survive her.[461]
That was written on May 7, 1848, but[459] another sadness weighing on him at the time was making him think back even further; to when he used to run around with his little older sister in the small garden of their house in Portsea. The small hope that Elliotson had given him in Paris had since completely faded; and I would learn, less than two months after the quoted letter, how close the end was. "A change occurred in poor Fanny," he wrote on July 5, "around midday yesterday, which brought me out there last night. Her cough suddenly almost stopped, and, strangely enough, she immediately realized her hopeless condition; to which she accepted, after an hour of restlessness and struggle, with extraordinary calmness and strength. The irritability faded, and all hope vanished; though just two nights before, she had been planning for 'after Christmas.' She is greatly changed. I had a long meeting with her today, alone; and once she expressed some wishes regarding the funeral and her wish to be buried in unconsecrated ground" (Mr. Burnett's family were dissenters), "I asked her if she had any cares or worries in the world. She said no, none. It was hard to die at such a young age, but she had no fear at all about the transition; she felt certain we would meet again in a better world; and even though they said she might recover for a bit, she didn’t truly want that. She said she felt completely calm and happy, relied on Christ’s mediation, and had no fear whatsoever. She had worked very hard, even while sick; but she believed that was just in her nature, and she neither regretted nor complained about it. Burnett had always been very good to her; they had never quarreled;[460] she felt sad thinking about him going back to such a lonely home; and she was worried about her children, but not overwhelmingly so. She showed me how thin and worn she had become; talked about an invention she had heard of that she would like to try for the deformed child's back; reminded me of all our sister Letitia's patience and steadiness; and although she cried sometimes, she clearly made it known that her mind was made up and at peace. I often asked her if there was anything she could think of that she wanted me to do, to write down, or to mention to someone if I wasn’t there; and she said she would, but she truly believed there was nothing—nothing. Her husband being young, she said, and her children infants, she couldn’t help but sometimes think that it would take a long time in the natural course of life before they were reunited; but she knew that was just a human fantasy and had no reality after she was gone. Such a touching display of strength and kindness, amidst all that early decay, is incredibly hard to describe. I don’t need to tell you how it affected me. I can’t look at the dear children here without some worry that this sad illness won’t leave our blood with her; but I’m sure I have no selfishness in that thought, and God knows how small the world feels to someone who comes out of such a sick-room on a bright summer day. I don’t know why I’m writing this before bed. I just know that in the very pity and sorrow of my heart, I feel like it’s doing something." After just a few weeks, she passed away, and the little child who was her last worry didn’t survive her for long either.[461]
In all the latter part of the year Dickens's thoughts were turning much to the form his next book should assume. A suggestion that he should write it in the first person, by way of change, had been thrown out by me, which he took at once very gravely; and this, with other things, though as yet not dreaming of any public use of his own personal and private recollections, conspired to bring about that resolve. The determination once taken, with what a singular truthfulness he contrived to blend the fact with the fiction may be shown by a small occurrence of this time. It has been inferred, from the vividness of the boy-impressions of Yarmouth in David's earliest experiences, that the place must have been familiar to his own boyhood: but the truth was that at the close of 1848 he first saw that celebrated sea-port. One of its earlier months had been signalised by an adventure in which Leech, Lemon, and myself took part with him, when, obtaining horses from Salisbury, we passed the whole of a March day in riding over every part of the Plain; visiting Stonehenge, and exploring Hazlitt's "hut" at Winterslow, birthplace of some of his finest essays; altogether with so brilliant a success that now (13th of November) he proposed to "repeat the Salisbury Plain idea in a new direction in mid-winter, to wit, Blackgang Chine in the Isle of Wight, with dark winter cliffs and roaring oceans." But mid-winter brought with it too much dreariness of its own, to render these stormy accompaniments to it very palatable; and on the last day of the year he bethought him "it would be better to make an outburst to some old cathedral city we don't know, and what do you say to Norwich[462] and Stanfield-hall?" Thither accordingly the three friends went, illness at the last disabling me; and of the result I heard (12th of January, 1849) that Stanfield-hall, the scene of a recent frightful tragedy, had nothing attractive unless the term might be applied to "a murderous look that seemed to invite such a crime. We arrived," continued Dickens, "between the Hall and Potass farm, as the search was going on for the pistol in a manner so consummately stupid, that there was nothing on earth to prevent any of Rush's labourers from accepting five pounds from Rush junior to find the weapon and give it to him. Norwich, a disappointment" (one pleasant face "transformeth a city," but he was unable yet to connect it with our delightful friend Elwin); "all save its place of execution, which we found fit for a gigantic scoundrel's exit. But the success of the trip, for me, was to come. Yarmouth, sir, where we went afterwards, is the strangest place in the wide world: one hundred and forty-six miles of hill-less marsh between it and London. More when we meet. I shall certainly try my hand at it." He made it the home of his "little Em'ly."
During the latter part of the year, Dickens was really focused on what form his next book should take. I had suggested he try writing it in the first person as a change, which he took very seriously. This, along with other factors, led him to decide to mix personal and fictional elements in his work, even though he wasn't yet thinking about sharing his personal memories publicly. Once he made that decision, he managed to blend truth and fiction so seamlessly that it’s illustrated by a small incident from that time. People have speculated that David's vivid childhood memories of Yarmouth suggest it must have been familiar to Dickens from his own youth, but the reality is he only saw that famous sea port for the first time at the end of 1848. Earlier that year, we had an adventure where Leech, Lemon, and I joined him for a day of riding across the Plain with horses we got from Salisbury; we visited Stonehenge and explored Hazlitt's "hut" at Winterslow, the birthplace of some of his best essays. The day was such a success that now, on November 13th, he suggested we "repeat the Salisbury Plain adventure in a new direction during winter, specifically Blackgang Chine in the Isle of Wight, with its dark winter cliffs and roaring ocean." However, winter brought its own dreariness that made those stormy conditions less appealing, and on the last day of the year, he thought it would be better to make a trip to some old cathedral city we hadn’t visited yet, and asked what I thought about Norwich and Stanfield Hall. So the three of us decided to go, although I ended up being unable to join them due to illness. I heard later, on January 12th, 1849, that Stanfield Hall, the site of a recent tragic event, wasn’t appealing, except for a "murderous look that seemed to invite such a crime." Dickens mentioned, "We arrived between the Hall and Potass farm while the search was happening for the pistol in a manner so incredibly foolish that there was nothing stopping any of Rush’s workers from accepting five pounds from Rush Jr. to find the weapon and hand it over. Norwich was a letdown" (one pleasant face can change a city, but he still couldn’t connect that with our delightful friend Elwin); "except for its execution site, which we found suitable for a gigantic scoundrel's exit. But the real success of the trip for me came later. Yarmouth, my friend, is the strangest place in the world: one hundred and forty-six miles of flat marshland between it and London. More when we meet. I will definitely give it a try." He made it the home of his "little Em'ly."
Everything now was taking that direction with him; and soon, to give his own account of it, his mind was upon names "running like a high sea." Four days after the date of the last-quoted letter ("all over happily, thank God, by four o'clock this morning") there came the birth of his eighth child and sixth son; whom at first he meant to call by Oliver Goldsmith's name, but settled afterwards into that of Henry Fielding; and to whom that early friend Ainsworth who had first made us known to each other, welcome and pleasant[463] companion always, was asked to be godfather. Telling me of the change in the name of the little fellow, which he had made in a kind of homage to the style of work he was now so bent on beginning, he added, "What should you think of this for a notion of a character? 'Yes, that is very true: but now, What's his motive?' I fancy I could make something like it into a kind of amusing and more innocent Pecksniff. 'Well now, yes—no doubt that was a fine thing to do! But now, stop a moment, let us see—What's his motive?'" Here again was but one of the many outward signs of fancy and fertility that accompanied the outset of all his more important books; though, as in their cases also, other moods of the mind incident to such beginnings were less favourable. "Deepest despondency, as usual, in commencing, besets me;" is the opening of the letter in which he speaks of what of course was always one of his first anxieties, the selection of a name. In this particular instance he had been undergoing doubts and misgivings to more than the usual degree. It was not until the 23rd of February he got to anything like the shape of a feasible title. "I should like to know how the enclosed (one of those I have been thinking of) strikes you, on a first acquaintance with it. It is odd, I think, and new; but it may have A's difficulty of being 'too comic, my boy.' I suppose I should have to add, though, by way of motto, 'And in short it led to the very Mag's Diversions. Old Saying.' Or would it be better, there being equal authority for either, 'And in short they all played Mag's Diversions. Old Saying?[464]'
Everything was heading in his direction now, and soon, as he put it, his thoughts were "racing like a high sea." Four days after the last letter (which said "all over happily, thank God, by four o'clock this morning"), he welcomed the birth of his eighth child and sixth son. At first, he thought of naming him after Oliver Goldsmith but later decided on Henry Fielding; he asked Ainsworth, the early friend who first introduced us, to be the godfather—a welcome and pleasant companion. Telling me about the name change for the little guy, which he made as a kind of tribute to the style of work he was eager to start, he added, "What do you think of this idea for a character? 'Yes, that’s very true: but now, What's his motive?' I think I could turn it into a more amusing and innocent version of Pecksniff. 'Well now, yes—no doubt that was a great thing to do! But now, wait a minute, let’s see—What's his motive?'" This was just one of the many signs of creativity and inspiration that he experienced at the start of each of his major books; though, as with them, other mindsets linked to such beginnings were less encouraging. "Deepest despair, as usual, in starting, surrounds me;" is how the letter opened, discussing what was always one of his initial concerns: choosing a name. In this case, he felt more doubts and worries than usual. It wasn't until February 23rd that he settled on something resembling a workable title. "I’d like to know how the enclosed (one of those I’ve been considering) hits you on a first impression. I think it’s strange and new, but it might run into A’s issue of being 'too comic, my boy.' I suppose I should add, as a motto, 'And in short it led to the very Mag's Diversions. Old Saying.' Or would it be better, since there's equal authority for either, 'And in short they all played Mag's Diversions. Old Saying?[464]'
Being the personal history of
Mr. Thomas Mag Jr.,
Of Blunderstone House."
This was hardly satisfactory, I thought; and it soon became apparent that he thought so too, although within the next three days I had it in three other forms. "Mag's Diversions, being the Personal History, Adventures, Experience and Observation of Mr. David Mag the Younger, of Blunderstone House." The second omitted Adventures, and called his hero Mr. David Mag the Younger, of Copperfield House. The third made nearer approach to what the destinies were leading him to, and transformed Mr. David Mag into Mr. David Copperfield the Younger and his great-aunt Margaret; retaining still as his leading title, Mag's Diversions. It is singular that it should never have occurred to him, while the name was thus strangely as by accident bringing itself together, that the initials were but his own reversed; but he was much startled when I pointed this out, and protested it was just in keeping with the fates and chances which were always befalling him. "Why else," he said, "should I so obstinately have kept to that name when once it turned up?"
This was hardly satisfying, I thought; and it quickly became clear that he felt the same way, although in the next three days, I saw it in three other forms. "Mag's Diversions, being the Personal History, Adventures, Experience, and Observation of Mr. David Mag the Younger, of Blunderstone House." The second version dropped "Adventures" and referred to the hero as Mr. David Mag the Younger, of Copperfield House. The third came closer to what fate was leading him to, changing Mr. David Mag into Mr. David Copperfield the Younger and his great-aunt Margaret, while still keeping the title Mag's Diversions. It's strange that it had never occurred to him, as the name was so oddly coming together by coincidence, that the initials were just his own reversed; he was quite surprised when I pointed this out and insisted it was perfectly in line with the fates and random events that always happened to him. "Why else," he said, "would I have stubbornly stuck to that name once it showed up?"
It was quite true that he did so, as I had curious proof following close upon the heels of that third proposal. "I wish," he wrote on the 26th of February, "you would look over carefully the titles now enclosed, and tell me to which you most incline. You will see that they give up Mag altogether, and refer exclusively[465] to one name—that which I last sent you. I doubt whether I could, on the whole, get a better name.
It was definitely true that he did that, as I had some interesting proof right after that third proposal. "I wish," he wrote on February 26th, "you would carefully review the titles I've enclosed and let me know which one you prefer. You'll see that they completely drop Mag and refer solely[465] to one name—the one I sent you last. I doubt I could find a better name overall."
"2. The Copperfield Records. Being the personal history, experience, and observation, of Mr. David Copperfield the Younger, of Copperfield Cottage.
"3. The Last Living Speech and Confession of David Copperfield Junior, of Blunderstone Lodge, who was never executed at the Old Bailey. Being his personal history found among his papers.
"4. The Copperfield Survey of the World as it Rolled. Being the personal history, experience, and observation, of David Copperfield the Younger, of Blunderstone Rookery.
"5. The Last Will and Testament of Mr. David Copperfield. Being his personal history left as a legacy.
"6. Copperfield, Complete. Being the whole personal history and experience of Mr. David Copperfield of Blunderstone House, which he never meant to be published on any account.
What I said is to be inferred from what he wrote back on the 28th. "The Survey has been my favourite from the first. Kate picked it out from the rest, without my saying anything about it. Georgy too. You hit upon it, on the first glance. Therefore I have no doubt that it is indisputably the best title; and I will stick to it." There was a change nevertheless. His completion of the second chapter defined to himself, more clearly than before, the character of the book; and the propriety of rejecting everything not strictly personal from the name given to it. The words proposed,[466] therefore, became ultimately these only: "The Personal History, Adventures, Experience, and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger, of Blunderstone Rookery, which he never meant to be published on any account." And the letter which told me that with this name it was finally to be launched on the first of May, told me also (19th April) the difficulties that still beset him at the opening. "My hand is out in the matter of Copperfield. To-day and yesterday I have done nothing. Though I know what I want to do, I am lumbering on like a stage-waggon. I can't even dine at the Temple to-day, I feel it so important to stick at it this evening, and make some head. I am quite aground; quite a literary Benedict, as he appeared when his heels wouldn't stay upon the carpet; and the long Copperfieldian perspective looks snowy and thick, this fine morning."[159] The allusion was to a dinner at his house the night before; when not only Rogers had to be borne out, having fallen sick at the table, but, as we rose soon after to quit the dining-room, Mr. Jules Benedict had quite suddenly followed the poet's lead, and fallen prostrate on the carpet in the midst of us. Amid the general consternation there seemed a want of proper attendance on the sick: the distinguished musician faring in this respect hardly so well as the famous bard, by whose protracted sufferings in the library, whither he had been removed,[467] the sanitary help available on the establishment was still absorbed; and as Dickens had been eloquent during dinner on the atrocities of a pauper-farming case at Tooting which was then exciting a fury of indignation, Fonblanque now declared him to be no better himself than a second Drouet, reducing his guests to a lamentable state by the food he had given them, and aggravating their sad condition by absence of all proper nursing. The joke was well kept up by Quin and Edwin Landseer, Lord Strangford joining in with a tragic sympathy for his friend the poet; and the banquet so dolefully interrupted ended in uproarious mirth. For nothing really serious had happened. Benedict went laughing away with his wife, and I helped Rogers on with his overshoes for his usual night-walk home. "Do you know how many waistcoats I wear?" asked the poet of me, as I was doing him this service. I professed my inability to guess. "Five!" he said: "and here they are!" Upon which he opened them, in the manner of the gravedigger in Hamlet, and showed me every one.
What I said can be figured out from what he wrote back on the 28th. "The Survey has been my favorite from the beginning. Kate chose it out from the others without me even saying a word. Georgy did too. You noticed it right away. So, I have no doubt that it's definitely the best title, and I'm going to stick with it." However, there was a change. His completion of the second chapter made it clearer to him than before what the book was about, and it became necessary to exclude anything not strictly personal from its title. Therefore, the final words proposed became just this: "The Personal History, Adventures, Experience, and Observation of David Copperfield the Younger, of Blunderstone Rookery, which he never meant to be published on any account." And the letter that informed me of this title being officially launched on the first of May also told me (19th April) about the challenges he was still facing at the start. "I'm stuck on the subject of Copperfield. Today and yesterday, I've done nothing. Although I know what I want to do, I feel like I'm moving like a slow wagon. I can't even have dinner at the Temple today because I think it's so important to focus on this evening and make some progress. I'm completely stuck; a total literary Benedict, like that guy who couldn’t keep his heels on the carpet; and the long Copperfieldian journey looks cloudy and overwhelming this fine morning." The allusion was to a dinner at his house the night before; when not only Rogers had to be carried out after getting sick at the table, but as we got up soon to leave the dining room, Mr. Jules Benedict suddenly followed the poet's lead and collapsed on the carpet among us. Amid the chaos, it seemed there was a lack of proper care for the sick: the distinguished musician wasn’t attended to as well as the famous poet, who was taken to the library for longer care, where the available medical help was still tied up. Dickens had been passionately discussing the shocking case of a pauper-farming issue in Tooting that was causing a strong wave of indignation, and now Fonblanque claimed he was no better than a second Drouet, leaving his guests in a sorry state from the meal he had served them and worsening their sad condition by not providing proper nursing. The joke was kept going by Quin and Edwin Landseer, with Lord Strangford joining in with a dramatic sympathy for his poet friend; and the dinner, so sadly interrupted, ended in wild laughter. Nothing really serious had happened. Benedict walked off laughing with his wife, and I helped Rogers with his overshoes for his usual night walk home. "Do you know how many vests I wear?" the poet asked me as I was helping him. I admitted I couldn’t guess. "Five!" he said: "and here they are!" Then he opened them up like the gravedigger in Hamlet and showed me each one.
That dinner was in the April of 1849, and among others present were Mrs. Procter and Mrs. Macready, dear and familiar names always in his house. No swifter or surer perception than Dickens's for what was solid and beautiful in character; he rated it higher than intellectual effort; and the same lofty place, first in his affection and respect, would have been Macready's and Procter's, if the one had not been the greatest of actors, and the other a poet as genuine as old Fletcher or Beaumont. There were present at this dinner also the American minister and Mrs. Bancroft (it was the[468] year of that visit of Macready to America, which ended in the disastrous Forrest riots); and it had among its guests Lady Graham, the wife of Sir James Graham, than whom not even the wit and beauty of her nieces, Mrs. Norton and Lady Dufferin, better represented the brilliant family of the Sheridans; so many of whose members, and these three above all, Dickens prized among his friends. The table that day will be "full" if I add the celebrated singer Miss Catherine Hayes, and her homely good-natured Irish mother, who startled us all very much by complimenting Mrs. Dickens on her having had for her father so clever a painter as Mr. Hogarth.
That dinner was in April 1849, and among the guests were Mrs. Procter and Mrs. Macready, familiar names that were always mentioned in his home. Dickens had an exceptional ability to recognize what was genuine and admirable in character; he valued it more than intellectual achievement. He held Macready and Procter in the same high regard, first in his affection and respect, if one wasn’t the greatest actor and the other a poet as authentic as old Fletcher or Beaumont. Also at this dinner were the American minister and Mrs. Bancroft (it was the[468]year of Macready's visit to America, which ended with the disastrous Forrest riots); and among the guests was Lady Graham, the wife of Sir James Graham, who represented the brilliant Sheridan family even better than the wit and beauty of her nieces, Mrs. Norton and Lady Dufferin; many members of this family, especially these three, were valued friends of Dickens. The table that day would be considered "full" if I included the renowned singer Miss Catherine Hayes and her kind-hearted Irish mother, who surprised everyone by complimenting Mrs. Dickens on having such a talented painter as her father, Mr. Hogarth.
Others familiar to Devonshire-terrace in these years will be indicated if I name an earlier dinner (3rd of January), for the "christening" of the Haunted Man, when, besides Lemons, Evanses, Leeches, Bradburys, and Stanfields, there were present Tenniel, Topham, Stone, Robert Bell, and Thomas Beard. Next month (24th of March) I met at his table, Lord and Lady Lovelace; Milner Gibson, Mowbray Morris, Horace Twiss, and their wives; Lady Molesworth and her daughter (Mrs. Ford); John Hardwick, Charles Babbage, and Dr. Locock. That distinguished physician had attended the poor girl, Miss Abercrombie, whose death by strychnine led to the exposure of Wainewright's murders; and the opinion he had formed of her chances of recovery, the external indications of that poison being then but imperfectly known, was first shaken, he told me, by the gloomy and despairing cries of the old family nurse, that her mother and her uncle had died exactly so! These, it was afterwards proved, had been[469] among the murderer's former victims. The Lovelaces were frequent guests after the return from Italy, Sir George Crawford, so friendly in Genoa, having married Lord Lovelace's sister; and few had a greater warmth of admiration for Dickens than Lord Byron's "Ada," on whom Paul Dombey's death laid a strange fascination. They were again at a dinner got up in the following year for Scribe and the composer Halévy, who had come over to bring out the Tempest at Her Majesty's-theatre, then managed by Mr. Lumley, who with M. Van de Weyer, Mrs. Gore and her daughter, the Hogarths, and I think the fine French comedian, Samson, were also among those present. Earlier that year there were gathered at his dinner-table the John Delanes, Isambard Brunels, Thomas Longmans (friends since the earliest Broadstairs days, and special favourites always), Lord Mulgrave, and Lord Carlisle, with all of whom his intercourse was intimate and frequent, and became especially so with Delane in later years. Lord Carlisle amused us that night, I remember, by repeating what the good old Brougham had said to him of "those Punch people," expressing what was really his fixed belief. "They never get my face, and are obliged" (which, like Pope, he always pronounced obleeged), "to put up with my plaid trousers!" Of Lord Mulgrave, pleasantly associated with the first American experiences, let me add that he now went with us to several outlying places of amusement of which he wished to acquire some knowledge, and which Dickens knew better than any man; small theatres, saloons, and gardens in city or borough, to which the Eagle and Britannia were as palaces; and I think he[470] was of the party one famous night in the summer of 1849 (29th of June), when with Talfourd, Edwin Landseer, and Stanfield, we went to the Battle of Waterloo at Vauxhall, and were astounded to see pass in immediately before us, in a bright white overcoat, the great Duke himself, Lady Douro on his arm, the little Ladies Ramsay by his side, and everybody cheering and clearing the way before him. That the old hero enjoyed it all, there could be no doubt, and he made no secret of his delight in "Young Hernandez;" but the "Battle" was undeniably tedious, and it was impossible not to sympathize with the repeatedly and very audibly expressed wish of Talfourd, that "the Prussians would come up!"
Others familiar with Devonshire Terrace during these years will be recognized if I mention an earlier dinner (January 3rd) for the "christening" of the Haunted Man, when, along with the Lemons, Evanses, Leeches, Bradburys, and Stanfields, there were also Tenniel, Topham, Stone, Robert Bell, and Thomas Beard. The following month (March 24th), I dined with Lord and Lady Lovelace; Milner Gibson, Mowbray Morris, Horace Twiss, and their wives; Lady Molesworth and her daughter (Mrs. Ford); John Hardwick, Charles Babbage, and Dr. Locock. That notable physician had treated the unfortunate Miss Abercrombie, whose death from strychnine led to the uncovering of Wainewright's murders. The opinion he had formed about her chances of recovery, as external signs of that poison were only beginning to be understood, was first shaken, he told me, by the gloomy and despairing cries of the old family nurse, declaring that her mother and her uncle had died in exactly the same way! It was later proven that they had been among the murderer's previous victims. The Lovelaces were regular guests after returning from Italy, as Sir George Crawford, who had been so friendly in Genoa, married Lord Lovelace's sister; and few admired Dickens more than Lord Byron's "Ada," who found a strange fascination in the death of Paul Dombey. They were present again at a dinner organized the following year for Scribe and the composer Halévy, who had come over to premiere the Tempest at Her Majesty's Theatre, then run by Mr. Lumley, who, along with M. Van de Weyer, Mrs. Gore and her daughter, the Hogarths, and I believe the talented French comedian, Samson, were also there. Earlier that year, the dinner table included John Delanes, Isambard Brunels, and Thomas Longmans (friends since the earliest Broadstairs days, and always special favorites), as well as Lord Mulgrave and Lord Carlisle, with whom Dickens had close and frequent interactions, particularly with Delane in later years. I recall that Lord Carlisle entertained us that night by repeating what the good old Brougham had said regarding "those Punch people," which truly reflected his fixed belief. "They never get my face, and are obliged" (which, like Pope, he always pronounced obleeged), "to put up with my plaid trousers!" About Lord Mulgrave, which brings back pleasant memories of the first American experiences, let me mention that he accompanied us to various remote entertainment venues which he wanted to learn about, and which Dickens knew better than anyone; small theaters, saloons, and gardens in the city or borough, where venues like the Eagle and Britannia felt like palaces. I think he was part of the group one famous night in the summer of 1849 (June 29th), when with Talfourd, Edwin Landseer, and Stanfield, we attended the Battle of Waterloo at Vauxhall and were amazed to see, right in front of us, the great Duke himself in a bright white overcoat, with Lady Douro on his arm and the little Ladies Ramsay by his side, everyone cheering and parting the way for him. There was no doubt that the old hero enjoyed it all, and he made no secret of his delight in "Young Hernandez"; however, the "Battle" was undeniably tedious, and it was impossible not to sympathize with Talfourd's repeatedly and very audibly expressed wish that "the Prussians would come up!"
The preceding month was that of the start of David Copperfield, and to one more dinner (on the 12th) I may especially refer for those who were present at it. Carlyle and Mrs. Carlyle came, Thackeray and Rogers, Mrs. Gaskell and Kenyon, Jerrold and Hablot Browne, with Mr. and Mrs. Tagart; and it was a delight to see the enjoyment of Dickens at Carlyle's laughing reply to questions about his health, that he was, in the language of Mr. Peggotty's housekeeper, a lorn lone creature and everything went contrairy with him. Things were not likely to go better, I thought, as I saw the great writer,—kindest as well as wisest of men, but not very patient under sentimental philosophies,—seated next the good Mr. Tagart, who soon was heard launching at him various metaphysical questions in regard to heaven and such like; and the relief was great when Thackeray introduced, with quaint whimsicality, a story which he and I had heard Macready relate in talking to us about[471] his boyish days, of a country actor who had supported himself for six months on his judicious treatment of the "tag" to the Castle Spectre. In the original it stands that you are to do away with suspicion, banish vile mistrust, and, almost in the words we had just heard from the minister to the philosopher, "Believe there is a Heaven nor Doubt that Heaven is just!" in place of which Macready's friend, observing that the drop fell for the most part quite coldly, substituted one night the more telling appeal, "And give us your Applause, for that is always just!" which brought down the house with rapture.
The previous month marked the beginning of David Copperfield, and I’d like to highlight one dinner (on the 12th) for those who were there. Carlyle and Mrs. Carlyle attended, along with Thackeray and Rogers, Mrs. Gaskell and Kenyon, Jerrold and Hablot Browne, and Mr. and Mrs. Tagart. It was a joy to see how much Dickens enjoyed Carlyle's humorous response to questions about his health, where he described himself, in the words of Mr. Peggotty's housekeeper, as a lorn lone creature and that everything was going wrong for him. I didn’t expect things to improve, especially as I noticed the great writer—both the kindest and the wisest of men, yet not very patient with sentimental philosophies—seated next to Mr. Tagart, who soon began to throw various metaphysical questions about heaven and similar topics at him. It was a huge relief when Thackeray brought up, with his usual whimsy, a story that he and I had heard Macready share about his younger years, concerning a country actor who had managed to support himself for six months by cleverly handling the “tag” in the Castle Spectre. In the original, it suggests getting rid of suspicion, banishing vile mistrust, and almost echoing the words we had just heard from the minister to the philosopher, "Believe there is a Heaven nor Doubt that Heaven is just!" Instead, Macready's friend noticed that the drop fell rather coldly, so one evening he changed it to the more impactful appeal, "And give us your Applause, for that is always just!" which thrilled the audience.
This chapter would far outrun its limits if I spoke of other as pleasant gatherings under Dickens's roof during the years which I am now more particularly describing; when, besides the dinners, the musical enjoyments and dancings, as his children became able to take part in them, were incessant. "Remember that for my Biography!" he said to me gravely on twelfth-day in 1849, after telling me what he had done the night before; and as gravely I now redeem my laughing promise that I would. Little Mary and her sister Kate had taken much pains to teach their father the polka, that he might dance it with them at their brother's birthday festivity (held this year on the 7th, as the 6th was a Sunday); and in the middle of the previous night as he lay in bed, the fear had fallen on him suddenly that the step was forgotten, and then and there, in that wintry dark cold night, he got out of bed to practise it. Anything more characteristic could certainly not be told; unless I could have shown him dancing it afterwards, and far excelling[472] the youngest performer in untiring vigour and vivacity. There was no one who approached him on these occasions excepting only our attached friend Captain Marryat, who had a frantic delight in dancing, especially with children, of whom and whose enjoyments he was as fond as it became so thoroughly good hearted a man to be. His name would have stood first among those I have been recalling, as he was among the first in Dickens's liking; but in the autumn of 1848 he had unexpectedly passed away. Other names however still reproach me for omission as my memory goes back. With Marryat's on the earliest page of this volume stands that of Monckton Milnes, familiar with Dickens over all the time it covers, and still more prominent in Tavistock-house days when with Lady Houghton he brought fresh claims to my friend's admiration and regard. Of Bulwer Lytton's frequent presence in all his houses, and of Dickens's admiration for him as one of the supreme masters in his art, so unswerving and so often publicly declared, it would be needless again to speak. Nor shall I dwell upon his interchange of hospitalities with distinguished men in the two great professions so closely allied to literature and its followers; Denmans, Pollocks, Campbells, and Chittys; Watsons, Southwood Smiths, Lococks, and Elliotsons. To Alfred Tennyson, through all the friendly and familiar days I am describing, he gave full allegiance and honoured welcome. Tom Taylor was often with him; and there was a charm for him I should find it difficult to exaggerate in Lord Dudley Stuart's gentle yet noble character, his refined intelligence and generous public life, expressed so perfectly[473] in his chivalrous face. Incomplete indeed would be the list if I did not add to it the frank and hearty Lord Nugent, who had so much of his grandfather, Goldsmith's friend, in his lettered tastes and jovial enjoyments. Nor should I forget occasional days with dear old Charles Kemble and one or other of his daughters; with Alexander Dyce; and with Harness and his sister, or his niece and her husband, Mr. and Mrs. Archdale; made especially pleasant by talk about great days of the stage. It was something to hear Kemble on his sister's Mrs. Beverley; or to see Harness and Dyce exultant in recollecting her Volumnia. The enchantment of the Mrs. Beverley, her brother would delightfully illustrate by imitation of her manner of restraining Beverley's intemperance to their only friend, "You are too busy, sir!" when she quietly came down the stage from a table at which she had seemed to be occupying herself, laid her hand softly on her husband's arm, and in a gentle half-whisper "No, not too busy; mistaken perhaps; but——" not only stayed his temper but reminded him of obligations forgotten in the heat of it. Up to where the tragic terror began, our friend told us, there was nothing but this composed domestic sweetness, expressed even in the simplicity and neat arrangement of her dress, her cap with the strait band, and her hair gathered up underneath; but all changing when the passion did begin; one single disordered lock escaping at the first outbreak, and, in the final madness, all of it streaming dishevelled down her beautiful face. Kemble made no secret of his belief that his sister had the higher genius of the two; but he spoke with rapture of "John's" Macbeth and[474] parts of his Othello; comparing his "Farewell the tranquil mind" to the running down of a clock, an image which he did not know that Hazlitt had applied to the delivery of "To-morrow and to-morrow," in the other tragedy. In all this Harness seemed to agree; and I thought a distinction was not ill put by him, on the night of which I speak, in his remark that the nature in Kemble's acting only supplemented his magnificent art, whereas, though the artist was not less supreme in his sister, it was on nature she most relied, bringing up the other power only to the aid of it. "It was in another sense like your writing," said Harness to Dickens, "the commonest natural feelings made great, even when not rendered more refined, by art." Her Constance would have been fishwify, he declared, if its wonderful truth had not overborne every other feeling; and her Volumnia escaped being vulgar only by being so excessively grand. But it was just what was so called "vulgarity" that made its passionate appeal to the vulgar in a better meaning of the word. When she first entered, Harness said, swaying and surging from side to side with every movement of the Roman crowd itself, as it went out and returned in confusion, she so absorbed her son into herself as she looked at him, so swelled and amplified in her pride and glory for him, that "the people in the pit blubbered all round," and he could no more help it than the rest.
This chapter would go way over its limits if I talked about other enjoyable gatherings at Dickens's home during the years I’m specifically describing. Besides the dinners, the musical entertainment and dancing were constant as his children grew old enough to join in. "Make sure to include that in my Biography!" he said to me seriously on Twelfth Night in 1849, after telling me what he’d done the night before; and seriously, I’m now keeping my promise to mention it. Little Mary and her sister Kate worked hard to teach their dad the polka so he could dance with them at their brother's birthday party (this year held on the 7th since the 6th was a Sunday); and in the middle of the night before, he suddenly got anxious that he had forgotten the steps, so he got out of bed in the cold, wintry darkness to practice. Nothing more characteristic could be said about him unless I could show him dancing afterward, far outdoing the youngest performer in endless energy and enthusiasm. No one came close to him during these occasions except our dear friend Captain Marryat, who had a wild love for dancing, especially with children, whom he adored as any good-hearted man would. His name would have been first among those I was recalling, as he was among Dickens's favorites; but he unexpectedly passed away in the autumn of 1848. However, there are other names my memory brings up that I feel bad about leaving out. Alongside Marryat’s on the first page of this volume is Monckton Milnes, who was familiar with Dickens throughout this time and stood out even more during the Tavistock House days when he and Lady Houghton brought fresh reasons for my friend's admiration and respect. It’s unnecessary to mention Bulwer Lytton’s frequent presence at all his homes, and Dickens’s unwavering admiration for him as one of the top masters of his craft, which he often publicly acknowledged. I won’t dwell on his exchanges of hospitality with distinguished figures in the two major professions that are closely tied to literature and its followers: Denmans, Pollocks, Campbells, and Chittys; Watsons, Southwood Smiths, Lococks, and Elliotsons. To Alfred Tennyson, during all the friendly and familiar days I'm describing, he offered full support and a warm welcome. Tom Taylor was often with him; and Lord Dudley Stuart’s gentle yet noble character, refined intelligence, and generous public life were charming in a way I’d struggle to exaggerate, perfectly reflected in his chivalrous face. The list would truly be incomplete if I didn't add the straightforward and warm-hearted Lord Nugent, who shared much of his grandfather Goldsmith's friend in lettered tastes and jovial enjoyment. I must also mention occasional days spent with dear old Charles Kemble and his daughters; with Alexander Dyce; and with Harness and his sister, or his niece and her husband, Mr. and Mrs. Archdale; made particularly enjoyable by conversations about the great days of the stage. It was a treat to hear Kemble talk about his sister Mrs. Beverley; or to see Harness and Dyce delight in remembering her Volumnia. Kemble would charmingly illustrate the magic of Mrs. Beverley by mimicking her way of tempering Beverley’s intemperance to their only friend, saying, "You are too busy, sir!" as she gracefully descended the stage from a table where she seemed occupied, lightly touching her husband's arm and gently whispering, "No, not too busy; perhaps mistaken; but——", which not only calmed his temper but reminded him of his responsibilities lost in the heat of the moment. Up until the moment when the tragic terror began, our friend told us there was only this calm domestic sweetness, even reflected in her simple, neatly arranged dress, her cap with a straight band, and her hair pulled up underneath; but all of that changed when the passion ignited; with a single disheveled lock escaping at the first outburst and, in her final madness, all of her hair flowing wildly down her beautiful face. Kemble never hid his belief that his sister had the greater genius of the two; yet he spoke with enthusiasm about "John's" Macbeth and parts of his Othello; comparing his "Farewell the tranquil mind" to a clock winding down, an image he didn’t know Hazlitt had used to describe the line "To-morrow and to-morrow" in the other tragedy. In all of this, Harness seemed to agree; and I thought he made a valid distinction on the night I’m speaking of, saying that the nature in Kemble's acting only complemented his incredible art, whereas with his sister, though the artist was equally supreme, it was nature she relied upon the most, bringing the other power in only to support it. "It was, in another sense, like your writing," Harness said to Dickens, "the simplest natural feelings made grand, even when they weren’t rendered more refined by art.” Her Constance would have been overly sentimental, he claimed, if its amazing truth hadn’t overshadowed everything else; and her Volumnia avoided being vulgar only because it was excessively grand. But it was precisely what some call "vulgarity" that made its passionate appeal to the ordinary in a better sense of the word. When she first entered, Harness said, swaying and moving side to side with the crowd of Romans bustling back and forth, she absorbed her son in her gaze, swelling with pride and glory for him, causing “the people in the pit to weep all around," and he couldn’t help it any more than the others.
There are yet some other names that should have place in these rambling recollections, though I by no means affect to remember all. One Sunday evening Mazzini made memorable by taking us to see the school he had established in Clerkenwell for the Italian organ-boys.[475] This was after dining with Dickens, who had been brought into personal intercourse with the great Italian by having given money to a begging impostor who made unauthorized use of his name. Edinburgh friends made him regular visits in the spring time: not Jeffrey and his family alone, but sheriff Gordon and his, with whom he was not less intimate, Lord Murray and his wife, Sir William Allan and his niece, Lord Robertson with his wonderful Scotch mimicries, and Peter Fraser with his enchanting Scotch songs; our excellent friend Liston the surgeon, until his fatal illness came in December 1848, being seldom absent from those assembled to bid such visitors welcome. Allan's name may remind me of other artists often at his house, Eastlakes, Leslies, Friths, and Wards, besides those who have had frequent mention, and among whom I should have included Charles as well as Edwin Landseer, and William Boxall. Nor should I drop from this section of his friends, than whom none were more attractive to him, such celebrated names in the sister arts as those of Miss Helen Faucit, an actress worthily associated with the brightest days of our friend Macready's managements, Mr. Sims Reeves, Mr. John Parry, Mr. Phelps, Mr. Webster, Mr. Harley, Mr. and Mrs. Keeley, Mr. Whitworth, and Miss Dolby. Mr. George Henry Lewes he had an old and great regard for; among other men of letters should not be forgotten the cordial Thomas Ingoldsby, and many-sided true-hearted Charles Knight; Mr. R. H. Horne and his wife were frequent visitors both in London and at seaside holidays; and I have met at his table Mr. and Mrs. S. C. Hall. There were the Duff Gordons too,[476] the Lyells, and, very old friends of us both, the Emerson Tennents; there was the good George Raymond, Mr. Frank Beard and his wife; the Porter Smiths, valued for Macready's sake as well as their own; Mr. and Mrs. Charles Black, near connections by marriage of George Cattermole, with whom there was intimate intercourse both before and during the residence in Italy; Mr. Thompson, brother of Mrs. Smithson formerly named, and his wife, whose sister Frederick Dickens married; Mr. Mitton, his own early companion; and Mrs. Torrens, who had played with the amateurs in Canada. These are all in my memory so connected with Devonshire-terrace, as friends or familiar acquaintance, that they claim this word before leaving it; and visitors from America, I may remark, had always a grateful reception. Of the Bancrofts mention has been made, and with them should be coupled the Abbot Lawrences, Prescott, Hillard, George Curtis, and Felton's brother. Felton himself did not visit England until the Tavistock-house time. In 1847 there was a delightful day with the Coldens and the Wilkses, relatives by marriage of Jeffrey; in the following year, I think at my rooms because of some accident that closed Devonshire-terrace that day (25th of April), Dickens, Carlyle, and myself foregathered with the admirable Emerson; and M. Van de Weyer will probably remember a dinner where he took joyous part with Dickens in running down a phrase which the learned in books, Mr. Cogswell, on a mission here for the Astor library, had startled us by denouncing as an uncouth Scotch barbarism—open up. You found it constantly in Hume, he said, but hardly anywhere[477] else; and he defied us to find it more than once through the whole of the volumes of Gibbon. Upon this, after brief wonder and doubt, we all thought it best to take part in a general assault upon open up, by invention of phrases on the same plan that should show it in exaggerated burlesque, and support Mr. Cogswell's indictment. Then came a struggle who should carry the absurdity farthest; and the victory remained with M. Van de Weyer until Dickens surpassed even him, and "opened up" depths of almost frenzied absurdity that would have delighted the heart of Leigh Hunt. It will introduce the last and not least honoured name into my list of his acquaintance and friends, if I mention his amusing little interruption one day to Professor Owen's description of a telescope of huge dimensions built by an enterprising clergyman who had taken to the study of the stars; and who was eager, said Owen, to see farther into heaven—he was going to say, than Lord Rosse; if Dickens had not drily interposed, "than his professional studies had enabled him to penetrate."
There are still some other names that deserve a mention in these scattered memories, though I certainly don’t claim to remember them all. One Sunday evening, Mazzini made it memorable by taking us to see the school he had set up in Clerkenwell for the Italian organ boys.[475] This was after dining with Dickens, who had met the great Italian because he had given money to a con artist falsely using his name. Friends from Edinburgh would regularly visit in the spring: not just Jeffrey and his family, but Sheriff Gordon and his family, whom he was just as close with, along with Lord Murray and his wife, Sir William Allan and his niece, Lord Robertson with his impressive Scottish impressions, and Peter Fraser with his beautiful Scottish songs; our wonderful friend Liston the surgeon was rarely absent from those gathered to welcome these visitors until his tragic illness in December 1848. Allan’s name might remind me of other artists who frequently visited his home, including Eastlakes, Leslies, Friths, and Wards, in addition to those previously mentioned, among whom I should have included Charles and Edwin Landseer, and William Boxall. I also shouldn’t forget some of his friends who were especially close to him, such as the acclaimed actress Miss Helen Faucit, associated with the brightest days of our friend Macready's managements, Mr. Sims Reeves, Mr. John Parry, Mr. Phelps, Mr. Webster, Mr. Harley, Mr. and Mrs. Keeley, Mr. Whitworth, and Miss Dolby. Mr. George Henry Lewes was someone he had a longstanding and deep respect for; among other literary figures, the warmhearted Thomas Ingoldsby and the versatile, genuine Charles Knight shouldn’t be overlooked; Mr. R. H. Horne and his wife often visited, both in London and during seaside holidays; and I’ve also been at his table with Mr. and Mrs. S. C. Hall. There were also the Duff Gordons,[476] the Lyells, and very old friends of both of us, the Emerson Tennents; there was the kind George Raymond, Mr. Frank Beard and his wife; the Porter Smiths, valued for Macready’s sake as well as their own; Mr. and Mrs. Charles Black, closely related by marriage to George Cattermole, with whom they had an intimate relationship both before and during their time in Italy; Mr. Thompson, brother of Mrs. Smithson previously mentioned, and his wife, whose sister Frederick Dickens married; Mr. Mitton, an early companion of his; and Mrs. Torrens, who had performed with amateur groups in Canada. All of these people are so connected in my memory with Devonshire Terrace as friends or familiar acquaintances that they deserve this mention before leaving it; and it’s worth noting that visitors from America were always received warmly. The Bancrofts have been mentioned, and with them should be included the Abbot Lawrences, Prescott, Hillard, George Curtis, and Felton's brother. Felton himself didn’t visit England until the Tavistock House period. In 1847, there was a delightful day spent with the Coldens and the Wilkses, relatives of Jeffrey by marriage; in the following year, I believe due to some incident that closed Devonshire Terrace that day (April 25th), Dickens, Carlyle, and I gathered at my rooms with the remarkable Emerson; and M. Van de Weyer will likely remember a dinner where he joyfully joined Dickens in dissecting a phrase that the bookish Mr. Cogswell, on a mission here for the Astor Library, had shocked us by denouncing as an uncouth Scottish barbarism—open up. He mentioned that it appeared consistently in Hume, he said, but hardly anywhere else[477] and challenged us to find it more than once throughout Gibbon's entire volumes. Following this, after a brief moment of surprise and doubt, we all thought it best to collectively lampoon open up, by coming up with exaggerated phrases that would highlight it in a ridiculous manner, thus supporting Mr. Cogswell's indictment. Then began a competition over who could push the absurdity the furthest; and M. Van de Weyer claimed victory until Dickens surpassed even him, “opening up” depths of almost frenzied absurdity that would have delighted Leigh Hunt. It brings me to the last and certainly not least honored name in my list of his acquaintances and friends, as I recall his amusing interruption one day during Professor Owen’s account of a huge telescope built by an enterprising clergyman who had taken up stargazing; eager, Owen said, to see further into heaven—he was about to say, than Lord Rosse; had Dickens not dryly interjected, "than his professional studies had enabled him to penetrate."
Some incidents that belong specially to the three years that closed his residence in the home thus associated with not the least interesting part of his career, will farther show what now were his occupations and ways of life. In the summer of 1849 he came up from Broadstairs to attend a Mansion-house dinner, which the lord mayor of that day had been moved by a laudable ambition to give to "literature and art," which he supposed would be adequately represented by the Royal Academy, the contributors to Punch, Dickens, and one or two newspaper men. On the whole the[478] result was not cheering; the worthy chief magistrate, no doubt quite undesignedly, expressing too much surprise at the unaccustomed faces around him to be altogether complimentary. In general (this was the tone) we are in the habit of having princes, dukes, ministers, and what not for our guests, but what a delight, all the greater for being unusual, to see gentlemen like you! In other words, what could possibly be pleasanter than for people satiated with greatness to get for a while by way of change into the butler's pantry? This in substance was Dickens's account to me next day, and his reason for having been very careful in his acknowledgment of the toast of "the Novelists." He was nettled not a little therefore by a jesting allusion to himself in the Daily News in connection with the proceedings, and asked me to forward a remonstrance. Having a strong dislike to all such displays of sensitiveness, I suppressed the letter; but it is perhaps worth printing now. Its date is Broadstairs, Wednesday 11th of July 1849. "I have no other interest in, or concern with, a most facetious article on last Saturday's dinner at the Mansion-house, which appeared in your paper of yesterday, and found its way here to-day, than that it misrepresents me in what I said on the occasion. If you should not think it at all damaging to the wit of that satire to state what I did say, I shall be much obliged to you. It was this. . . . That I considered the compliment of a recognition of Literature by the citizens of London the more acceptable to us because it was unusual in that hall, and likely to be an advantage and benefit to them in proportion as it became in future less unusual. That, on behalf of the novelists, I accepted[479] the tribute as an appropriate one; inasmuch as we had sometimes reason to hope that our imaginary worlds afforded an occasional refuge to men busily engaged in the toils of life, from which they came forth none the worse to a renewal of its strivings; and certainly that the chief magistrate of the greatest city in the world might be fitly regarded as the representative of that class of our readers."
Some incidents from the three years that concluded his time in that home, which were a notable part of his career, will further illustrate his activities and lifestyle. In the summer of 1849, he traveled from Broadstairs to attend a Mansion House dinner, hosted by that day's lord mayor, who was motivated by a commendable desire to honor "literature and art," which he thought would be sufficiently represented by the Royal Academy, the contributors to Punch, Dickens, and a couple of newspaper journalists. Overall, the[478] outcome was not uplifting; the well-meaning mayor, probably without intending it, expressed too much surprise at seeing unfamiliar faces around him to be entirely flattering. Generally (this was the mood), we usually host princes, dukes, ministers, and such as our guests, but what a joy, made even better by being rare, to see gentlemen like you! In other words, what could be more enjoyable for people jaded by grandeur than to briefly change their scenery by stepping into the butler's pantry? This was essentially Dickens's account to me the next day, and his reason for being particularly thoughtful in his acknowledgment of the toast to "the Novelists." He was quite annoyed, therefore, by a joking reference to himself in the Daily News regarding the event and asked me to send a complaint. Having a strong aversion to such displays of sensitivity, I chose not to send the letter; however, it might be worth sharing now. It was dated from Broadstairs, Wednesday, July 11, 1849. "I have no other interest in, or connection to, a rather amusing article about last Saturday's dinner at the Mansion House, which appeared in your paper yesterday and reached me today, other than that it misrepresents what I said on the occasion. If you don’t think it would harm the humor of that piece to clarify what I did say, I would appreciate it. It was this... that I considered the acknowledgment of Literature by the citizens of London more valuable to us because it is unusual in that hall, and it could be beneficial to them as it becomes less unusual in the future. That, on behalf of the novelists, I accepted[479] the tribute as fitting, as we sometimes hoped that our imagined worlds offered a temporary escape for people deeply engaged in the struggles of life, from which they returned none the worse for a renewed effort; and certainly that the mayor of the greatest city in the world could fairly be seen as the representative of that group of our readers."
Of an incident towards the close of the year, though it had important practical results, brief mention will here suffice. We saw the Mannings executed on the walls of Horsemonger-lane gaol; and with the letter which Dickens wrote next day to the Times descriptive of what we had witnessed on that memorable morning, there began an active agitation against public executions which never ceased until the salutary change was effected which has worked so well. Shortly after this he visited Rockingham-castle, the seat of Mr. and Mrs. Watson, his Lausanne friends; and I must preface by a word or two the amusing letter in which he told me of this visit. It was written in character, and the character was that of an American visitor to England.
Towards the end of the year, there was an incident that, while it had significant practical results, only a brief mention is needed here. We witnessed the Mannings being executed at Horsemonger-lane jail; and the letter Dickens wrote the next day to the Times, describing what we saw that memorable morning, kicked off a strong movement against public executions that continued until the helpful change was made that worked out so well. Soon after this, he visited Rockingham Castle, the home of Mr. and Mrs. Watson, his friends from Lausanne; and I need to add a few words about the entertaining letter in which he shared details of this visit. It was written in character, adopting the persona of an American visitor to England.
"I knew him, Horatio;" and a very kindly honest man he was, who had come to England authorised to make enquiry into our general agricultural condition, and who discharged his mission by publishing some reports extremely creditable to his good sense and ability, expressed in a plain nervous English that reminded one of the rural writings of Cobbett. But in an evil hour he published also a series of private letters to friends written from the various residences his introductions had opened to him; and these were filled with revelations[480] as to the internal economy of English noblemen's country houses, of a highly startling description. As for example, how, on arrival at a house your "name is announced, and your portmanteau immediately taken into your chamber, which the servant shows you, with every convenience." How "you are asked by the servant at breakfast what you will have, or you get up and help yourself." How at dinner you don't dash at the dishes, or contend for the "fixings," but wait till "his portion is handed by servants to every one." How all the wines, fruit, glasses, candlesticks, lamps, and plate are "taken care of" by butlers, who have under-butlers for their "adjuncts;" how ladies never wear "white satin shoes or white gloves more than once;" how dinner napkins are "never left upon the table, but either thrown into your chair or on the floor under the table;" how no end of pains are taken to "empty slops;" and above all what a national propensity there is to brush a man's clothes and polish his boots, whensoever and wheresoever the clothes and boots can be seized without the man.[160] This was what Dickens good-humouredly laughs at.
"I knew him, Horatio," and he was a really kind and honest man, who came to England with the authority to investigate our overall agricultural situation. He fulfilled his mission by publishing reports that showcased his good sense and ability, written in straightforward, engaging English that reminded one of Cobbett's rural writings. Unfortunately, he also published a series of private letters to friends from various places he stayed thanks to his introductions, and these contained shocking revelations about the inner workings of English noblemen's country houses. For example, when you arrive at a house, your "name is announced, and your suitcase is immediately taken to your room, which the servant shows you, with all the conveniences." You might be asked by the servant at breakfast what you'd like, or you just get up and help yourself. At dinner, you don't dive at the dishes or fight over the "fixings," but wait until "his portion is served by the servants to everyone." All the wines, fruit, glasses, candlesticks, lamps, and silverware are "managed" by butlers, who have under-butlers as their "assistants;" ladies never wear "white satin shoes or white gloves more than once;" dinner napkins are "never left on the table, but either thrown into your chair or onto the floor under the table;" a lot of effort is made to "empty slops;" and above all, there is a national tendency to brush a man's clothes and shine his boots whenever and wherever the clothes and boots can be grabbed without the owner noticing. This is what Dickens humorously pokes fun at.
"Rockingham Castle: Friday, thirtieth of November, 1849. Picture to yourself, my dear F, a large old castle, approached by an ancient keep, portcullis, &c., &c., filled with company, waited on by six-and-twenty servants; the slops (and wine-glasses) continually being emptied; and my clothes (with myself in them) always being carried off to all sorts of places; and you will have a faint idea of the mansion in which I am at present staying. I should have written to you yesterday, but for having had a very busy day. Among the guests is a Miss B, sister of the Honourable Miss B (of Salem, Mass.), whom we once met at the house of our distinguished literary countryman Colonel Landor. This lady is renowned as an amateur actress, so last night we got up in the great hall some scenes from the School for Scandal; the scene with the lunatic on the wall, from the Nicholas Nickleby of Major-General the Hon. C. Dickens (Richmond, Va.); some conjuring; and then finished off with country-dances; of which we had two admirably good ones, quite new to me, though really old. Getting the words, and making the preparations, occupied (as you may believe) the whole day; and it was three o'clock before I got to bed. It was an excellent entertainment, and we were all uncommonly merry. . . . I had a very polite letter from our enterprising countryman Major Bentley[161] (of Lexington, Ky.), which I shall show you when I come home. We leave here this afternoon, and I shall expect you according to appointment, at a quarter past[482] ten a.m. to-morrow. Of all the country-houses and estates I have yet seen in England, I think this is by far the best. Everything undertaken eventuates in a most magnificent hospitality; and you will be pleased to hear that our celebrated fellow citizen General Boxall (Pittsburg, Penn.) is engaged in handing down to posterity the face of the owner of the mansion and of his youthful son and daughter. At a future time it will be my duty to report on the turnips, mangel-wurzel, ploughs, and live stock; and for the present I will only say that I regard it as a fortunate circumstance for the neighbouring community that this patrimony should have fallen to my spirited and enlightened host. Every one has profited by it, and the labouring people in especial are thoroughly well cared-for and looked after. To see all the household, headed by an enormously fat housekeeper, occupying the back benches last night, laughing and applauding without any restraint; and to see a blushing sleek-headed footman produce, for the watch-trick, a silver watch of the most portentous dimensions, amidst the rapturous delight of his brethren and sisterhood; was a very pleasant spectacle, even to a conscientious republican like yourself or me, who cannot but contemplate the parent country with feelings of pride in our own land, which (as was well observed by the Honorable Elias Deeze, of Hertford, Conn.) is truly the land of the free. Best remembrances from Columbia's daughters. Ever thine, my dear F,—C.H." Dickens, during the too brief time this excellent friend was spared to him, often repeated his visits to Rockingham, always a surpassing enjoyment; and in the winter of 1851 he accomplished[483] there, with help of the country carpenter, "a very elegant little theatre," of which he constituted himself manager, and had among his actors a brother of the lady referred to in his letter, "a very good comic actor, but loose in words;" poor Augustus Stafford "more than passable;" and "a son of Vernon Smith's, really a capital low comedian." It will be one more added to the many examples I have given of his untiring energy both in work and play, if I mention the fact that this theatre was opened at Rockingham for their first representation on Wednesday the 15th of January; that after the performance there was a country dance which lasted far into the morning; and that on the next evening, after a railway journey of more than 120 miles, he dined in London with the prime minister, Lord John Russell.
"Rockingham Castle: Friday, November 30, 1849. Imagine, my dear F, a large old castle with an ancient keep and portcullis, filled with guests and attended by twenty-six servants; drinks (and wine glasses) being constantly emptied; and my clothes (and myself in them) being taken off to all sorts of places, and you will have a vague idea of the mansion where I'm currently staying. I meant to write to you yesterday, but I had a very busy day. Among the guests is a Miss B, sister of the Honorable Miss B (from Salem, Mass.), whom we once met at the home of our distinguished literary compatriot Colonel Landor. This lady is famous for being an amateur actress, so last night we performed scenes from the School for Scandal in the great hall; the scene with the lunatic on the wall from Major-General the Hon. C. Dickens's Nicholas Nickleby (from Richmond, Va.); some magic tricks; and then we finished with country dances, of which we had two that were quite good, even though they were really old and new to me. Preparing the dialogue and getting everything ready took the whole day, and it was three o'clock by the time I got to bed. It was a fantastic evening, and we were all really joyful. I received a very polite letter from our enterprising fellow countryman Major Bentley[161] (from Lexington, Ky.), which I’ll show you when I get home. We’re leaving here this afternoon, and I expect you as planned at a quarter past[482] ten morning tomorrow. Of all the country houses and estates I have visited in England, this one stands out as the best. Everything done here results in fantastic hospitality, and you'll be glad to hear that our celebrated fellow citizen General Boxall (from Pittsburgh, Penn.) is capturing the likeness of the owner of the mansion and his young son and daughter for posterity. In the future, I will have to report on the turnips, mangel-wurzel, plows, and livestock; for now, I can only say that I think it's a lucky situation for the local community that this inheritance went to my spirited and enlightened host. Everyone has benefited from it, and especially the laboring class is well cared for and looked after. Seeing the entire household, led by a hugely overweight housekeeper, sitting in the back last night, laughing and clapping freely; and watching a blushing, smooth-headed footman bring out, as part of the watch trick, a silver watch of immense size, surrounded by the delighted cheers of his companions; was a very pleasant sight, even for a conscientious republican like you or me, who can only look at the mother country with pride in our own land, which (as the Honorable Elias Deeze from Hertford, Conn., pointed out) is truly the land of the free. Best wishes from Columbia's daughters. Always yours, my dear F,—C.H." Dickens, during the brief time his excellent friend was still with him, frequently visited Rockingham, which was always a tremendous pleasure; and in the winter of 1851, he created, with the help of a local carpenter, "a very elegant little theatre," of which he became the manager, featuring among his actors a brother of the lady mentioned in his letter, "a very good comic actor, but loose in words;" poor Augustus Stafford being "more than passable;" and "a son of Vernon Smith's, who was genuinely a terrific low comedian." This adds yet another example of his tireless energy in both work and play, as I should mention that this theatre opened at Rockingham for its inaugural performance on Wednesday, January 15; that after the show, there was a country dance that lasted well into the morning; and that the following evening, after a train journey of over 120 miles, he dined in London with the Prime Minister, Lord John Russell.
A little earlier in that winter we had together taken his eldest son to Eton, and a little later he had a great sorrow. "Poor dear Jeffrey!" he wrote to me on the 29th January, 1850. "I bought a Times at the station yesterday morning, and was so stunned by the announcement, that I felt it in that wounded part of me, almost directly; and the bad symptoms (modified) returned within a few hours. I had a letter from him in extraordinary good spirits within this week or two—he was better, he said, than he had been for a long time—and I sent him proof-sheets of the number only last Wednesday. I say nothing of his wonderful abilities and great career, but he was a most affectionate and devoted friend to me; and though no man could wish to live and die more happily, so old in years and yet so young in faculties and sympathies, I am very[484] very deeply grieved for his loss." He was justly entitled to feel pride in being able so to word his tribute of sorrowing affection. Jeffrey had completed with consummate success, if ever man did, the work appointed him in this world; and few, after a life of such activities, have left a memory so unstained and pure. But other and sharper sorrows awaited Dickens.
A little earlier that winter, we took his eldest son to Eton, and soon after, he faced a great loss. "Poor dear Jeffrey!" he wrote to me on January 29, 1850. "I bought a Times at the station yesterday morning, and I was so shocked by the announcement that I felt it in that sensitive part of me almost immediately; the bad signs (though less severe) returned within hours. I had received a letter from him just a week or two ago, and he was in extraordinary good spirits—he said he was feeling better than he had for a long time—and I sent him proof-sheets of the issue only last Wednesday. I won't go on about his remarkable talents and impressive career, but he was a very caring and loyal friend to me; and though no one could hope to live and die happier, being both wise with age and youthful in heart and mind, I am truly[484] very deeply saddened by his loss." He had every right to feel proud of the way he expressed his heartfelt tribute. Jeffrey had accomplished his purpose in this world with exceptional success, and few people, after such an active life, have left behind a memory as unblemished and pure. But other, sharper sorrows awaited Dickens.
The chief occupation of the past and present year, David Copperfield, will have a chapter to itself, and in this may be touched but lightly. Once fairly in it, the story bore him irresistibly along; certainly with less trouble to himself in the composition, beyond that ardent sympathy with the creatures of the fancy which always made so absolutely real to him their sufferings or sorrows; and he was probably never less harassed by interruptions or breaks in his invention. His principal hesitation occurred in connection with the child-wife Dora, who had become a great favourite as he went on; and it was shortly after her fate had been decided, in the early autumn of 1850,[162] but before she[485] breathed her last, that a third daughter was born to him, to whom he gave his dying little heroine's name. On these and other points, without forestalling what waits to be said of the composition of this fine story, a few illustrative words from his letters will properly find a place here. "Copperfield half done," he wrote of the second number on the 6th of June. "I feel, thank God, quite confident in the story. I have a move in it ready for this month; another for next; and another for the next." "I think it is necessary" (15th of November) "to decide against the special pleader. Your reasons quite suffice. I am not sure but that the banking house might do. I will consider it in a walk." "Banking business impracticable" (17th of November) "on account of the confinement: which would stop the story, I foresee. I have taken, for the present at all events, the proctor. I am wonderfully in harness, and nothing galls or frets." "Copperfield done" (20th[486] of November) "after two days' very hard work indeed; and I think a smashing number. His first dissipation I hope will be found worthy of attention, as a piece of grotesque truth." "I feel a great hope" (23rd of January, 1850) "that I shall be remembered by little Em'ly, a good many years to come." "I begin to have my doubts of being able to join you" (20th of February), "for Copperfield runs high, and must be done to-morrow. But I'll do it if possible, and strain every nerve. Some beautiful comic love, I hope, in the number." "Still undecided about Dora" (7th of May), "but must decide to-day."[163] "I have been" (Tuesday, 20th of August) "very hard at work these three days, and have still Dora to kill. But with good luck, I may do it to-morrow. Obliged to go to Shepherd's-bush to-day, and can consequently do little this morning. Am eschewing all sorts of things that present themselves to my fancy—coming in such crowds!" "Work in a very decent state of advancement" (13th[487] of August) "domesticity notwithstanding. I hope I shall have a splendid number. I feel the story to its minutest point." "Mrs. Micawber is still" (15th of August), "I regret to say, in statu quo. Ever yours, Wilkins Micawber." The little girl was born the next day, the 16th, and received the name of Dora Annie. The most part of what remained of the year was passed away from home.
The main focus of last year and this year, David Copperfield, will have its own chapter, which we’ll discuss briefly. Once I really got into it, the story pulled me along effortlessly; composing it caused me less trouble than usual, aside from the intense empathy for the characters that made their pain and sadness feel so real to me. I was probably never less bothered by interruptions or lapses in creativity. The main pause I had was regarding the child-wife Dora, who grew to be a favorite as I wrote; shortly after her fate was set, in the early autumn of 1850,[162] but before she passed away, a third daughter was born to me, and I named her after my dying little heroine. On these topics and others, without spoiling what’s to come regarding the creation of this great story, a few illustrative quotes from my letters will fit here. “Copperfield is half done,” I wrote about the second issue on June 6th. “I feel, thank God, completely confident in the story. I have a plan ready for this month; another for next; and another for the month after.” “I think it’s necessary” (November 15th) “to decide against the special pleader. Your reasons are more than enough. I’m not sure if the banking house could work. I’ll think about it while I walk.” “Banking business isn’t feasible” (November 17th) “because of the confinement: I foresee it would halt the story. For now, I’ve taken on the proctor. I’m wonderfully productive, and nothing annoys or frustrates me.” “Copperfield is done” (November 20th) “after two days of very hard work; I think it’s an incredible issue. I hope his first diversion will be seen as a worthy piece of grotesque truth.” “I feel a great hope” (January 23, 1850) “that little Em'ly will remember me for many years.” “I’m starting to doubt I can join you” (February 20), “because Copperfield is extensive and must be finished by tomorrow. But I’ll do it if I can, and push myself hard. I hope for some beautiful comic love in this issue.” “Still undecided about Dora” (May 7th), “but I must decide today.”[163] “I have been” (Tuesday, August 20th) “working really hard these past three days, and still have to finish up with Dora. But with some luck, I might wrap it up tomorrow. I need to go to Shepherd's Bush today, so I can’t do much this morning. I’m trying to steer clear of all sorts of distractions that keep coming to mind—there are so many!” “Work is progressing well” (August 13th) “despite my home life. I hope I’ll have a fantastic issue. I feel the story down to its smallest detail.” “Mrs. Micawber is still” (August 15th), “I regret to say, just the same. Yours, Wilkins Micawber.” The little girl was born the next day, on the 16th, and was named Dora Annie. Most of the rest of the year was spent away from home.
The year following did not open with favourable omen, both the child and its mother having severe illness. The former rallied however, and "little Dora is getting on bravely, thank God!" was his bulletin of the early part of February. Soon after, it was resolved to make trial of Great Malvern for Mrs. Dickens; and lodgings were taken there in March, Dickens and her sister accompanying her, and the children being left in London. "It is a most beautiful place," he wrote to me (15th of March). "O Heaven, to meet the Cold Waterers (as I did this morning when I went out for a shower-bath) dashing down the hills, with severe expressions on their countenances, like men doing matches and not exactly winning! Then, a young lady in a grey polka going up the hills, regardless of legs; and meeting a young gentleman (a bad case, I should say) with a light black silk cap on under his hat, and the pimples of I don't know how many douches under that. Likewise an old man who ran over a milk-child, rather than stop!—with no neckcloth, on principle; and with his mouth wide open, to catch the morning air." This was the month, as we have seen, when the performances for the Guild were in active preparation, and it was also the[488] date of the farewell dinner to our friend Macready on his quitting the stage. Dickens and myself came up for it from Malvern, to which he returned the next day; and from the spirited speech in which he gave the health of the chairman at the dinner, I will add a few words for the sake of the truth expressed in them. "There is a popular prejudice, a kind of superstition, that authors are not a particularly united body, and I am afraid that this may contain half a grain or so of the veracious. But of our chairman I have never in my life made public mention without adding what I can never repress, that in the path we both tread I have uniformly found him to be, from the first, the most generous of men; quick to encourage, slow to disparage, and ever anxious to assert the order of which he is so great an ornament. That we men of letters are, or have been, invariably or inseparably attached to each other, it may not be possible to say, formerly or now; but there cannot now be, and there cannot ever have been, among the followers of literature, a man so entirely without the grudging little jealousies that too often disparage its brightness, as Sir Edward Bulwer Lytton." That was as richly merited as it is happily said.
The following year didn't start off well, as both the child and its mother were seriously ill. However, the child improved, and he reported, "little Dora is doing well, thank God!" in early February. Shortly after, they decided to try Great Malvern for Mrs. Dickens; they found lodging there in March, with Dickens and her sister accompanying her while the children stayed in London. "It's a beautiful place," he wrote to me on March 15. "Oh, heaven, I met the Cold Waterers (as I did this morning when I went out for a shower-bath) racing down the hills, looking intense, like they were competing and not exactly winning! Then, a young lady in a gray polka dress going up the hills, not caring about her legs; and she ran into a young gentleman (a tough situation, I’d say) wearing a light black silk cap under his hat, with who knows how many douches underneath. Also, an old man who ran over a milk-child rather than stop!—without a necktie, by choice; and his mouth wide open to catch the morning air." This was the month, as we noted, when they were actively preparing for the performances for the Guild, and it was also the date of the farewell dinner for our friend Macready as he was leaving the stage. Dickens and I came up for it from Malvern, where he returned the next day; and from the spirited speech he gave to toast the chairman at dinner, I'll add a few words for the sake of the truth he expressed. "There’s a common misconception, a kind of superstition, that authors aren’t particularly united, and I’m afraid there might be some truth to that. But I’ve never publicly mentioned our chairman without adding what I can’t hold back: in the path we both walk, I’ve consistently found him to be, from the beginning, the most generous man; quick to encourage, slow to criticize, and always eager to promote the art that he so richly enhances. Whether we writers are, or have been, closely connected with each other, it’s hard to say, now or in the past; but there cannot now be, nor has there ever been, among those in literature, a man so completely free of the petty jealousies that too often cloud its brilliance as Sir Edward Bulwer Lytton." That praise was well-deserved and beautifully expressed.
Dickens had to return to London after the middle of March for business connected with a charitable Home established at Shepherd's-bush by Miss Coutts, in the benevolent hope of rescuing fallen women by testing their fitness for emigration, of which future mention will be made, and which largely and regularly occupied his time for several years. On this occasion his stay was prolonged by the illness of his[489] father. His health had been failing latterly, and graver symptoms were now spoken of. "I saw my poor father twice yesterday," he wrote to me on the 27th, "the second time between ten and eleven at night. In the morning I thought him not so well. At night, as well as any one in such a situation could be." Next day he was so much better that his son went back to Malvern, and even gave us grounds for hope that we might yet have his presence in Hertfordshire to advise on some questions connected with the comedy which Sir Edward Lytton had written for the Guild. But the end came suddenly. I returned from Knebworth to London, supposing that some accident had detained him at Malvern; and at my house this letter waited me. "Devonshire-terrace, Monday, thirty-first of March 1851. . . . My poor father died this morning at five and twenty minutes to six. They had sent for me to Malvern, but I passed John on the railway; for I came up with the intention of hurrying down to Bulwer Lytton's to-day before you should have left. I arrived at eleven last night, and was in Keppel-street at a quarter past eleven. But he did not know me, nor any one. He began to sink at about noon yesterday, and never rallied afterwards. I remained there until he died—O so quietly. . . . I hardly know what to do. I am going up to Highgate to get the ground. Perhaps you may like to go, and I should like it if you do. I will not leave here before two o'clock. I think I must go down to Malvern again, at night, to know what is to be done about the children's mourning; and as you are returning to Bulwer's I should like to have gone that way, if Bradshaw gave me any hope of[490] doing it. I wish most particularly to see you, I needn't say. I must not let myself be distracted by anything—and God knows I have left a sad sight!—from the scheme on which so much depends. Most part of the alterations proposed I think good." Mr. John Dickens was laid in Highgate Cemetery on the 5th of April; and the stone placed over him by the son who has made his name a famous one in England, bore tribute to his "zealous, useful, cheerful spirit." What more is to be said of him will be most becomingly said in speaking of David Copperfield. While the book was in course of being written, all that had been best in him came more and more vividly back to its author's memory; as time wore on, nothing else was remembered; and five years before his own death, after using in one of his letters to me a phrase rather out of the common with him, this was added: "I find this looks like my poor father, whom I regard as a better man the longer I live."
Dickens had to go back to London after mid-March for business related to a charitable home set up in Shepherd's Bush by Miss Coutts. She hoped to help fallen women by assessing their readiness for emigration, which will be mentioned later and occupied much of his time for several years. This time, his stay was extended by the illness of his [489] father. His health had been declining recently, and more serious symptoms were now being discussed. "I saw my poor father twice yesterday," he wrote to me on the 27th, "the second time between ten and eleven at night. In the morning, I thought he wasn't doing as well. At night, he was as well as anyone could be in his situation." The next day, he felt a lot better, so his son went back to Malvern and even gave us some hope that he might still be able to join us in Hertfordshire to help with questions related to the comedy that Sir Edward Lytton had written for the Guild. But the end came suddenly. I returned from Knebworth to London, thinking he had been delayed in Malvern; and at my house, this letter was waiting for me. "Devonshire-terrace, Monday, March 31, 1851... My poor father died this morning at five twenty-five minutes to six. They had sent for me to Malvern, but I passed John on the railway; I came up intending to rush down to Bulwer Lytton's today before you left. I arrived at eleven last night and was in Keppel-street at a quarter past eleven. But he didn’t recognize me or anyone else. He began to decline around noon yesterday and never recovered. I stayed there until he passed—oh so quietly... I hardly know what to do. I'm heading to Highgate to sort out the burial plot. You might want to come, and I would appreciate it if you did. I won't leave here until two o'clock. I think I have to go back to Malvern tonight to figure out what to do about the children's mourning; and since you're heading back to Bulwer's, I'd like to have gone that way if Bradshaw gave me any hope of [490] making it happen. I really want to see you, no need to say. I have to stay focused on the plan that means so much. Most of the proposed changes seem good to me." Mr. John Dickens was buried in Highgate Cemetery on April 5th; the stone placed over him by his son, who has made his name famous in England, honored his "zealous, useful, cheerful spirit." More can be said about him in connection with David Copperfield. While the book was being written, all the best qualities of him came vividly back to the author's mind. As time passed, nothing else was remembered; and five years before his own death, after using a phrase that was somewhat unusual for him in one of his letters to me, he added this: "I find this looks like my poor father, whom I regard as a better man the longer I live."
He was at this time under promise to take the chair at the General Theatrical Fund on the 14th of April. Great efforts were made to relieve him from the promise; but such special importance was attached to his being present, and the Fund so sorely then required help, that, no change of day being found possible for the actors who desired to attend, he yielded to the pressure put upon him; of which the result was to throw upon me a sad responsibility. The reader will understand why, even at this distance of time; my allusion to it is brief.
He was committed to chairing the General Theatrical Fund on April 14th. Many attempts were made to relieve him of this commitment; however, his presence was deemed extremely important, and the Fund desperately needed support at that time. Since it wasn’t possible to change the date for the actors who wanted to attend, he eventually gave in to the pressure, which placed a heavy responsibility on me. The reader will understand why my mention of it is short, even after all this time.
The train from Malvern brought him up only five minutes short of the hour appointed for the dinner, and[491] we first met that day at the London Tavern. I never heard him to greater advantage than in the speech that followed. His liking for this Fund was the fact of its not confining its benefits to any special or exclusive body of actors, but opening them generously to all; and he gave a description of the kind of actor, going down to the infinitesimally small, not omitted from such kind help, which had a half-pathetic humour in it that makes it charming still. "In our Fund," he said, "the word exclusiveness is not known. We include every actor, whether he be Hamlet or Benedict: the ghost, the bandit, or the court physician; or, in his one person, the whole king's army. He may do the light business, or the heavy, or the comic, or the eccentric. He may be the captain who courts the young lady, whose uncle still unaccountably persists in dressing himself in a costume one hundred years older than his time. Or he may be the young lady's brother in the white gloves and inexpressibles, whose duty in the family appears to be to listen to the female members of it whenever they sing, and to shake hands with everybody between all the verses. Or he may be the baron who gives the fête, and who sits uneasily on the sofa under a canopy with the baroness while the fête is going on. Or he may be the peasant at the fête who comes on the stage to swell the drinking chorus, and who, it may be observed, always turns his glass upside down before he begins to drink out of it. Or he may be the clown who takes away the doorstep of the house where the evening party is going on. Or he may be the gentleman who issues out of the house on the false alarm, and is precipitated into the area. Or, if an actress,[492] she may be the fairy who resides for ever in a revolving star with an occasional visit to a bower or a palace. Or again, if an actor, he may be the armed head of the witch's cauldron; or even that extraordinary witch, concerning whom I have observed in country places, that he is much less like the notion formed from the description of Hopkins than the Malcolm or Donalbain of the previous scenes. This society, in short, says, 'Be you what you may, be you actor or actress, be your path in your profession never so high or never so low, never so haughty or never so humble, we offer you the means of doing good to yourselves, and of doing good to your brethren.'"
The train from Malvern got him there just five minutes before dinner, and[491] we first met that day at the London Tavern. I’ve never heard him speak better than in the speech that followed. What he liked about this Fund was that it didn’t limit its benefits to any specific group of actors but made them available to everyone; and he described the kind of actor, down to the tiniest detail, who wasn’t excluded from such help, and there was a half-pathetic humor in it that still makes it charming. "In our Fund," he said, "the word exclusiveness doesn’t exist. We include every actor, whether he’s Hamlet or Benedict: the ghost, the bandit, or the court physician; or, in his one role, the whole king's army. He can do light roles, heavy ones, comedic, or eccentric. He might be the captain who’s romantically interested in the young lady, whose uncle still absurdly insists on dressing in a costume from a century ago. Or he might be the young lady's brother in white gloves and fancy trousers, whose role in the family seems to be listening to the women singing and shaking hands with everyone between verses. He could be the baron hosting the party, sitting awkwardly on the sofa under a canopy with the baroness while the festivities are happening. Or he might be the peasant at the party who comes on stage to join the drinking song and, as you’ll notice, always tips his glass upside down before he drinks from it. He might be the clown who removes the doorstep of the house where the evening gathering is taking place. Or he might be the gentleman who rushes out of the house in response to a false alarm and ends up in the area below. If it’s an actress,[492] she might be the fairy who lives forever in a revolving star with occasional visits to a bower or a palace. Or, if it’s an actor, he might be the armed head from the witch's cauldron; or even that remarkable witch, whom I’ve noticed in rural areas, seems much less like the description of Hopkins than like Malcolm or Donalbain from earlier scenes. This society, in short, says, 'No matter who you are, whether you’re an actor or actress, whether your career is high or low, proud or humble, we offer you the means to do good for yourselves and for your fellow actors.'"
Half an hour before he rose to speak I had been called out of the room. It was the servant from Devonshire-terrace to tell me his child Dora was suddenly dead. She had not been strong from her birth; but there was just at this time no cause for special fear, when unexpected convulsions came, and the frail little life passed away. My decision had to be formed at once; and I satisfied myself that it would be best to permit his part of the proceedings to close before the truth was told to him. But as he went on, after the sentences I have quoted, to speak of actors having to come from scenes of sickness, of suffering, aye, even of death itself, to play their parts before us, my part was very difficult. "Yet how often is it with all of us," he proceeded to say, and I remember to this hour with what anguish I listened to words that had for myself alone, in all the crowded room, their full significance: "how often is it with all of us, that in our several spheres we have to do violence to our feelings, and to[493] hide our hearts in carrying on this fight of life, if we would bravely discharge in it our duties and responsibilities." In the disclosure that followed when he left the chair, Mr. Lemon, who was present, assisted me; and I left this good friend with him next day, when I went myself to Malvern and brought back Mrs. Dickens and her sister. The little child lies in a grave at Highgate near that of Mr. and Mrs. John Dickens; and on the stone which covers her is now written also her father's name, and those of two of her brothers.
Half an hour before he was about to speak, I was called out of the room. It was the servant from Devonshire Terrace, informing me that his child Dora had suddenly passed away. She hadn't been strong since birth, but at that moment, there was no specific reason for alarm when unexpected convulsions struck, and the fragile little life slipped away. I had to make a decision quickly, and I concluded it would be best to let him finish his part before revealing the truth. But as he continued, after the lines I quoted, to talk about how actors have to come from places of illness, suffering, and even death to perform for us, my role became very difficult. "Yet how often is it with all of us," he went on to say, and I still remember the pain I felt listening to words that held a deep meaning just for me, in the crowded room: "how often is it with all of us that in our various roles we have to suppress our emotions and hide our hearts in this battle of life, if we are to fulfill our duties and responsibilities bravely." When he finished speaking, Mr. Lemon, who was also there, helped me with the announcement; and I left this good friend with him the next day when I went to Malvern to bring back Mrs. Dickens and her sister. The little child is buried in a grave at Highgate, close to Mr. and Mrs. John Dickens; and on the stone that marks her resting place, her father's name and those of two of her brothers are now also inscribed.
One more public discussion he took part in, before quitting London for the rest of the summer; and what he said (it was a meeting, with Lord Carlisle in the chair, in aid of Sanitary reform) very pregnantly illustrates what was remarked by me on a former page. He declared his belief that neither education nor religion could do anything really useful in social improvement until the way had been paved for their ministrations by cleanliness and decency. He spoke warmly of the services of Lord Ashley in connection with ragged schools, but he put the case of a miserable child tempted into one of those schools out of the noisome places in which his life was passed, and he asked what a few hours' teaching could effect against the ever-renewed lesson of a whole existence. "But give him, and his, a glimpse of heaven through a little of its light and air; give them water; help them to be clean; lighten the heavy atmosphere in which their spirits flag, and which makes them the callous things they are; take the body of the dead relative from the room where the living live with it, and where such loathsome familiarity deprives death itself of awe; and then, but[494] not before, they will be brought willingly to hear of Him whose thoughts were so much with the wretched, and who had compassion for all human sorrow." He closed by proposing Lord Ashley's health as having preferred the higher ambition of labouring for the poor to that of pursuing the career open to him in the service of the State; and as having also had "the courage on all occasions to face the cant which is the worst and commonest of all, the cant about the cant of philanthropy." Lord Shaftesbury first dined with him in the following year at Tavistock-house.
One more public discussion he took part in before leaving London for the rest of the summer; and what he said (it was a meeting with Lord Carlisle in the chair, supporting Sanitary reform) clearly illustrates what I mentioned earlier. He expressed his belief that neither education nor religion could truly contribute to social improvement until cleanliness and decency created the right environment for them to flourish. He spoke highly of Lord Ashley's efforts with ragged schools, but he presented the case of a miserable child drawn into one of those schools from the filthy environments they lived in, questioning what a few hours of teaching could achieve against the ongoing lessons of a lifetime. "But give him, and those like him, a glimpse of heaven through a bit of light and fresh air; provide them with water; help them to be clean; lift the heavy atmosphere that weighs down their spirits and turns them into the indifferent beings they are; remove the body of the deceased relative from the room where the living are, where such disgusting familiarity strips death of its dread; and then, but not before, they will be willing to hear about Him who cared deeply for the afflicted and who had compassion for all human suffering." He concluded by proposing a toast to Lord Ashley's health for choosing the higher path of helping the poor over pursuing his political career, and for having "the courage to confront the hypocrisy that is the worst and most common of all, the hypocrisy surrounding philanthropy." Lord Shaftesbury first dined with him the following year at Tavistock-house.
Shortly after the Sanitary meeting came the first Guild performances; and then Dickens left Devonshire-terrace, never to return to it. What occupied him in the interval before he took possession of his new abode, has before been told; but two letters were overlooked in describing his progress in the labour of the previous year, and brief extracts from them will naturally lead me to the subject of my next chapter. "I have been" (15th of September) "tremendously at work these two days; eight hours at a stretch yesterday, and six hours and a half to-day, with the Ham and Steerforth chapter, which has completely knocked me over—utterly defeated me!" "I am" (21st of October) "within three pages of the shore; and am strangely divided, as usual in such cases, between sorrow and joy. Oh, my dear Forster, if I were to say half of what Copperfield makes me feel to-night, how strangely, even to you, I should be turned inside out! I seem to be sending some part of myself into the Shadowy World."
Shortly after the Sanitary meeting, the first Guild performances took place, and then Dickens left Devonshire Terrace, never to return. What occupied him during the time before he moved into his new home has been previously noted; however, two letters were overlooked when recounting his progress in the work of the prior year, and brief excerpts from them will naturally lead me into the subject of my next chapter. "I have been" (September 15) "working incredibly hard these last two days; eight hours straight yesterday and six and a half hours today, including the Ham and Steerforth chapter, which has completely overwhelmed me—utterly defeated me!" "I am" (October 21) "just three pages away from the end; and, as usual in these situations, I feel a strange mix of sadness and joy. Oh, my dear Forster, if I were to express even half of what Copperfield makes me feel tonight, you would think I was bizarrely exposing myself! It feels as if I’m sending a part of myself into the Shadowy World."
THE LIFE
OF
THE LIFE
OF
CHARLES DICKENS
BY
JOHN FORSTER.
VOL. III.
1852-1870.
ILLUSTRATIONS.
PAGE | |
Autograph of Charles Dickens | Fly-leaf |
Charles Dickens, æt. 56. From the last photograph taken in America, in 1868. Engraved by J. C. Armytage | Frontispiece |
Devonshire Terrace. From a drawing by Daniel Maclise, R.A. | 41 |
Tavistock House | 53 |
Facsimile of plan prepared for first number of David Copperfield | 157 |
Facsimile of plan prepared for first number of Little Dorrit | 158 |
The Porch at Gadshill | 204 |
The Châlet | 213 |
House and conservatory, from the meadow | 216 |
The study at Gadshill | 222 |
Facsimile from the last page of Edwin Drood, written on the 8th of June, 1870 | 468 |
Facsimile of a page of Oliver Twist, written in 1837 | 469 |
The Grave. From an original water-colour drawing, executed for this Work, by S. L. Fildes. Engraved by J. Saddler | to face p. 544 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS.
CHAPTER I. 1850-1853. | |
Pages 21-50. | |
David Copperfield and Bleak House. Age. 38-41. | |
page | |
Interest of Copperfield | 21 |
Real people in novels | 22 |
Scott, Smollett, and Fielding | 22 |
Complaint and atonement | 23 |
Earlier and later methods | 24 |
Boythorn and Skimpole | 26 |
Yielding to temptation | 27 |
Changes made in Skimpole | 28 |
Relatives put into books | 29 |
Scott and his father | 29 |
Dickens and his father | 30 |
No harm done | 32 |
Micawber and Skimpole | 32 |
Dickens and David | 33 |
Dangers of autobiography | 34 |
Design of David's character | 35 |
Why books continue | 36 |
The storm and shipwreck | 37 |
Goethe on the insane | 38 |
The two heroines | 39 |
Risks not worth running | 40 |
Devonshire Terrace | 41 |
Bleak House | 43 |
Defects of the novel | 44 |
Set-offs and successes | 45 |
Value of critical judgments | 46 |
The contact of extremes | 47 |
Dean Ramsay on Jo | 48 |
Town graves | 49 |
One last friend | 49 |
Truth of Gridley's case | 50 |
CHAPTER II. 1853-1855. | |
Pages 51-75. | |
Home Incidents and Tough Times. Age. 41-43. | |
Titles proposed for Bleak House | 52 |
Restlessness | 52 |
Tavistock House | 53 |
Last child born | 54 |
A young stage aspirant | 54 |
Deaths of friends | 55 |
At Boulogne | 55 |
Publishing agreements | 56 |
At Birmingham | 56 |
Self-changes | 57 |
Employments in Boulogne | 59 |
First reading in public | 60 |
Argument against paid readings | 61 |
Children's theatricals | 62 |
Mr. H. in Tom Thumb | 62 |
Dickens in Fortunio | 63 |
Titles for a new story | 65 |
Difficulties of weekly parts | 66 |
Mr. Ruskin on Hard Times | 67 |
Truths enforced | 68 |
Early experiences | 69 |
Strike at Preston | 69 |
Speaking at Drury Lane | 70 |
Stanfield scenes | 71 |
Tavistock House theatricals | 71 |
Peter Cunningham | 73 |
Incident of a November night | 74 |
Degrees in misery | 75 |
[viii] | |
CHAPTER III. 1853. | |
Pages 76-95. | |
Switzerland and Italy Revisited. Æt. 41. | |
Swiss people | 76 |
Narrow escape | 77 |
Lausanne and Genoa | 78 |
The Peschiere and its owner | 79 |
On the way to Naples | 80 |
A night on board ship | 81 |
A Greek potentate | 82 |
Going out to dinner | 83 |
The old idle Frenchman | 84 |
Changes and old friends | 85 |
A "scattering" party | 86 |
The puppets at Rome | 87 |
Malaria and desolation | 88 |
Plague-smitten places | 89 |
Again in Venice | 90 |
A painter among paintings | 91 |
Liking for the Sardinians | 92 |
Neapolitans in exile | 93 |
Travelling police arrangements | 94 |
Dickens and the Austrian | 95 |
CHAPTER IV. 1853, 1854, and 1856. | |
Pages 96-120. | |
Three Summers at Boulogne. Age. 41, 42, 44. | |
Visits to France | 96 |
First summer residence (1853) | 97 |
Villa des Moulineaux | 98 |
Doll's house and offices | 99 |
Bon garçon of a landlord | 100 |
Making the most of it | 101 |
Among Putney market-gardeners | 102 |
Shakespearian performance | 103 |
Pictures at the pig-market | 104 |
English friends | 105 |
Change of villa (1854) | 105 |
The Northern Camp | 106 |
Visit of Prince Albert | 107 |
Emperor, Prince, and Dickens | 108 |
"Like boxing" | 109 |
The Empress at a review | 110 |
A French conjuror | 110 |
Conjuring by Dickens | 111 |
Making demons of cards | 112 |
Conjuror's compliment and vision | 114 |
Old residence resumed (1856) | 115 |
Last of the Camp | 116 |
A household war | 117 |
State of siege | 118 |
Death of Gilbert A'Becket | 119 |
Leaving for England | 119 |
CHAPTER V. 1855, 1856. | |
Pages 121-153. | |
Living in Paris. Æt. 43-44. | |
Actors and dramas | 122 |
Frédéric Lemaitre | 122 |
Last scene in Gambler's Life | 123 |
Apartment in Champs Elysées | 124 |
French Translation of Dickens | 125 |
Ary Scheffer and Daniel Manin | 126 |
English friends | 126 |
Acting at the Français | 127 |
Dumas' Orestes | 129 |
Paradise Lost at the Ambigu | 130 |
Profane nonsense | 131 |
French As You Like It | 132 |
Story of a French drama | 133 |
A delightful "Tag" | 134 |
Auber and Queen Victoria | 134 |
Scribe and his wife | 136 |
At Regnier's | 137 |
Viardot in Orphée | 138 |
Meets Georges Sand | 138 |
Banquet at Girardin's | 139 |
Second banquet | 141 |
Bourse and its victims | 142 |
Entry of troops from Crimea | 143 |
Zouaves and their dog | 144 |
[ix]Streets on New Year's Day | 145 |
English and French art | 146 |
Emperor and Edwin Landseer | 147 |
Sitting to Ary Scheffer | 148 |
Scheffer as to the likeness | 149 |
A duchess murdered | 150 |
Truth is stranger than fiction | 151 |
Singular scenes described | 152 |
What became of the actors | 153 |
CHAPTER VI. 1855-1857. | |
Pages 154-176. | |
Little Dorrit and a Lazy Tour. Age. 43-45. | |
Watts's Rochester charity | 155 |
Tablet to Dickens in Cathedral | 155 |
Nobody's Fault | 155 |
How the Dorrit story grew | 156 |
Number-Plan of Copperfield | 157 |
Number-Plan of Dorrit | 158 |
Circumlocution Office | 159 |
Flora and Mr. F—— | 160 |
Weak and strong points | 161 |
A scene of boy-trials | 162 |
Reception of the novel | 163 |
Christmas theatricals | 164 |
Theatre-making | 165 |
Rush for places | 166 |
Douglas Jerrold's death | 168 |
Exertions and result | 168 |
Seeing the serpents fed | 169 |
Lazy Tour projected | 170 |
Up Carrick Fell | 170 |
Accident to Mr. Wilkie Collins | 171 |
At Wigton and Allonby | 172 |
The Yorkshire landlady | 173 |
Doncaster in race week | 174 |
A performance of Money | 175 |
CHAPTER VII. 1857-1858. | |
Pages 177-201. | |
What Happened This Time. Æt. 45-46. | |
Disappointments and distastes | 177 |
What we seem and are | 178 |
Compensations of Art | 179 |
Misgivings | 180 |
A defect and a merit | 181 |
Reply to a remonstrance | 182 |
Dangerous comfort | 183 |
One happiness missed | 184 |
Homily on life | 185 |
Confidences | 186 |
Rejoinder to a reply | 187 |
What the world cannot give | 189 |
An old project revived | 189 |
Shakespeare on acting | 191 |
Hospital for sick children | 192 |
Charities of the very poor | 192 |
Unsolved mysteries | 194 |
Appeal for sick children | 195 |
Reading for Child's Hospital | 195 |
Proposal for Paid readings | 196 |
Question of the Plunge | 198 |
Mr. Arthur Smith | 199 |
Separation from Mrs. Dickens | 200 |
What alone concerned the public | 201 |
CHAPTER VIII. 1856-1870. | |
Pages 202-222. | |
Gadshill Place. Age. 44-58. | |
First description of it | 202 |
The porch | 204 |
Negotiations for purchase | 204 |
Becomes his home | 205 |
Gadshill a century ago | 206 |
Past owners and tenants | 207 |
Sinking a well | 209 |
Gradual additions | 210 |
Gift from Mr. Fechter | 211 |
Dickens's writing-table | 211 |
The châlet | 213 |
Much coveted acquisition | 214 |
Last improvement | 215 |
Visits of friends | 216 |
Dickens's Dogs | 218 |
A Fenian mastiff | 218 |
Linda and Mrs. Bouncer | 219 |
Favourite walks | 220 |
The study and chair | 222 |
[x] | |
CHAPTER IX. 1858-1859. | |
Pages 223-238. | |
First Paid Readings. Age. 46-47. | |
Various managements | 223 |
One day's work | 224 |
Impressions of Dublin | 225 |
Irish audiences | 226 |
Young Ireland and Old England | 227 |
Railway ride to Belfast | 229 |
Brought near his Fame | 229 |
A knowing audience | 231 |
Greeting in Manchester | 231 |
Joined by his daughters | 232 |
Strange life | 233 |
Scotch audiences | 234 |
When most successful in reading | 235 |
At public meetings | 236 |
Miss Marie Wilton as Pippo | 237 |
Ed. Landseer on Frith's portrait | 238 |
CHAPTER X. 1859-1861. | |
Pages 239-254. | |
All Year Long and the Uncommercial Traveler. Age. 47-49. | |
Household Words discontinued | 240 |
Earliest and latest publishers | 240 |
Dickens and Mr. Bentley | 241 |
In search of a title | 242 |
A title found | 243 |
Success of new periodical | 244 |
Difference from the old | 245 |
At Knebworth | 246 |
Commercial Travellers' Schools | 247 |
A Traveller for human interests | 248 |
Personal references in writing | 249 |
Birds and low company | 250 |
Bethnal-green fowls | 251 |
An incident of Doughty Street | 252 |
Offers from America | 253 |
CHAPTER XI. 1861-1863. | |
Pages 255-274. | |
Second Series of Readings. Age. 49-51. | |
Daughter Kate's marriage | 255 |
Charles Alston Collins | 257 |
Sale of Tavistock House | 257 |
Brother Alfred's death | 258 |
Metropolitan readings | 258 |
Provincial circuit | 259 |
New subjects for readings | 260 |
Death of Mr. Arthur Smith | 261 |
Death of Mr. Henry Austin | 262 |
Readings at Brighton | 263 |
At Canterbury and Dover | 264 |
Alarming scene | 265 |
Impromptu reading-hall | 266 |
Scenes in Scotland | 267 |
At Torquay | 268 |
Death of C. C. Felton | 269 |
Offers for Australia | 270 |
Writing or Reading? | 271 |
Home arguments | 272 |
Religious Richardson's Show | 273 |
Exiled ex-potentate | 274 |
CHAPTER XII. 1855-1865. | |
Pages 275-297. | |
Hints for Both Published and Unpublished Books. Age. 43-53. | |
Book of MS. memoranda | 275 |
Originals of characters | 277 |
Fancies put into books | 277 |
Notions for Little Dorrit | 278 |
Suggestions for other books | 279 |
Hints for last completed book | 280 |
Fancies never used | 281 |
[xi]Ideas not worked out | 282 |
A touching fancy | 284 |
Domestic subjects | 284 |
Characters of women | 285 |
Other female groups | 286 |
Uncle Sam | 288 |
Sketches of selfishness | 288 |
Striking thoughts | 290 |
Subjects not accomplished | 290 |
Characters laid aside | 291 |
Available names | 293 |
Titles for books | 293 |
Names for girls and boys | 295 |
An undistinguished crowd | 296 |
Mr. Brobity's snuff-box | 297 |
CHAPTER XIII. 1864-1867. | |
Pages 298-324. | |
Third Series of Readings. Age. 52-55. | |
Death of Thackeray | 298 |
Mother's death | 300 |
Death of second son | 300 |
Interest in Mr. Fechter | 301 |
Notes on theatres | 302 |
Sorrowful new year | 303 |
C. W. Dilke's death | 303 |
Staplehurst accident | 305 |
Illness and suffering | 305 |
Enters on new readings | 306 |
Last meeting with Mrs. Carlyle | 308 |
Mrs. Carlyle's death | 309 |
Offer for more readings | 309 |
Grave warnings | 311 |
In Scotland | 312 |
Exertion and its result | 313 |
Self-deception | 314 |
An old malady | 314 |
Scene at Tynemouth | 316 |
In Dublin with the Fenians | 317 |
Yielding to temptation | 318 |
Pressure from America | 319 |
At bay at last | 320 |
Warning unheeded | 321 |
Discussion useless | 322 |
The case in a nutshell | 323 |
Decision to go | 324 |
CHAPTER XIV. 1836-1870. | |
Pages 325-386. | |
Dickens as a Novelist. Age. 24-58. | |
See before you oversee | 326 |
M. Taine's criticism | 326 |
What is overlooked in it | 327 |
A popularity explained | 328 |
National excuses for Dickens | 330 |
Comparison with Balzac | 330 |
Anticipatory reply to M. Taine | 332 |
A critic in the Fortnightly Review | 333 |
Blame and praise to be reconciled | 333 |
A plea for objectors | 334 |
"Hallucinative" imagination | 335 |
Vain critical warnings | 336 |
The critic and the criticised | 336 |
An opinion on the Micawbers | 338 |
Hallucinative phenomena | 338 |
Scott writing Bride of Lammermoor | 339 |
Claim to be fairly judged | 340 |
Dickens's leading quality | 341 |
Dangers of Humour | 342 |
His earlier books | 343 |
Mastery of dialogue | 344 |
Character-drawing | 345 |
Realities of fiction | 346 |
Fielding and Dickens | 347 |
Touching of extremes | 347 |
Why the creations of fiction live | 349 |
Enjoyment of his own humour | 350 |
Unpublished note of Lord Lytton | 350 |
Exaggerations of humour | 351 |
Temptations of all great humourists | 352 |
A word for fanciful descriptions | 353 |
Tale of Two Cities | 355 |
Difficulties and success | 355 |
Specialty of treatment | 356 |
Reply to objections | 357 |
[xii]Care with which Dickens worked | 358 |
An American critic | 359 |
Great Expectations | 360 |
Pip and Magwitch | 361 |
Another boy-child for hero | 362 |
Unlikeness in likeness | 363 |
Vivid descriptive writing | 364 |
Masterly drawing of character | 365 |
A day on the Thames | 366 |
Homely and shrewd satire | 367 |
Incident changed for Lytton | 368 |
As originally written | 369 |
Christmas Sketches | 370 |
Our Mutual Friend | 370 |
Writing numbers in advance | 373 |
Working slowly | 374 |
Death of John Leech | 375 |
A fatal anniversary | 376 |
Effects on himself and his novel | 376 |
A tale by Edmond About | 378 |
First and Last | 378 |
Doctor Marigold | 379 |
Minor stories | 380 |
"Something from Above" | 381 |
Purity of Dickens's writings | 382 |
Substitute for an alleged deficiency | 382 |
True province of humour | 383 |
Horace Greeley and Longfellow | 384 |
Letters from an American | 385 |
Companions for solitude | 386 |
CHAPTER XV. 1867. | |
Pages 387-406. | |
America Revisited. November and December, 1867. Age. 55. | |
Warmth of the greeting | 388 |
Same cause as in 1842 | 388 |
Old and new friends | 389 |
Changes since 1842 | 390 |
First Boston reading | 391 |
Scene at New York sales | 393 |
First New York reading | 393 |
An action against Dickens | 394 |
A fire at his hotel | 395 |
Local and general politics | 397 |
Railway arrangements | 398 |
Police of New York | 398 |
Mistletoe from England | 399 |
As to newspapers | 400 |
Nothing lasts long | 401 |
Cities chosen for readings | 401 |
Scene of a murder visited | 402 |
A dinner at the murderer's | 403 |
Illness and abstinence | 404 |
Miseries of American travel | 405 |
Startling prospect | 406 |
CHAPTER XVI. 1868. | |
Pages 407-443. | |
America Revisited. January to April, 1868. Age. 56. | |
Speculators and public | 408 |
An Englishman's disadvantage | 408 |
"Freedom and independence" | 408 |
Mountain-sneezers and eye-openers | 409 |
The work and the gain | 410 |
A scene at Brooklyn | 411 |
At Philadelphia | 412 |
"Looking up the judge" | 413 |
Improved social ways | 414 |
Result of thirty-four readings | 415 |
Shadow to the sunshine | 416 |
Readings in a church | 417 |
Change of plan | 417 |
Baltimore women | 418 |
Success in Philadelphia | 419 |
Objections to coloured people | 420 |
With Sumner at Washington | 421 |
President Lincoln's dream | 423 |
Interview with President Johnson | 423 |
Washington audiences | 424 |
A comical dog | 425 |
Incident before a reading | 426 |
[xiii]The child and the doll | 427 |
North-west tour | 428 |
Political excitement | 429 |
Struggle for tickets | 430 |
American female beauty | 432 |
Sherry to "slop round" with | 432 |
Final impression of Niagara | 433 |
Letter to Mr. Ouvry | 434 |
"Getting along" through water | 435 |
Again attacked by lameness | 437 |
Illness and exertion | 437 |
Seeing prevents believing | 439 |
All but used up | 439 |
Last Boston readings | 440 |
New York farewells | 441 |
The receipts throughout | 441 |
Promise at public dinner | 442 |
The Adieu | 443 |
CHAPTER XVII. 1868-1870. | |
Pages 444-460. | |
Last Readings. Age. 56-58. | |
Health improved | 444 |
What the readings did and undid | 445 |
Expenses and gains in America | 446 |
Noticeable changes in him | 447 |
Oliver Twist reading proposed | 448 |
Objections to it | 449 |
Death of Frederick Dickens | 450 |
Macready at Oliver Twist reading | 451 |
Another attack of illness | 452 |
A doctors' difference | 454 |
At Emerson Tennent's funeral | 454 |
The illness at Preston | 455 |
Brought to London | 456 |
Sir Thomas Watson consulted | 456 |
His note of the case | 457 |
Guarded sanction to other readings | 458 |
Close of career as public reader | 460 |
CHAPTER XVIII. 1869-1870. | |
Pages 461-477. | |
Last Book. At. 57-58. | |
The agreement for Edwin Drood | 461 |
First fancy for it | 462 |
Story as planned in his mind | 463 |
What to be its course and end | 463 |
Merits of the fragment | 464 |
Comparison of early and late MSS | 466 |
Discovery of an unpublished scene | 467 |
Last page of Drood in fac-simile | 468 |
Page of Oliver Twist in fac-simile | 469 |
Delightful specimen of Dickens | 470 |
Unpublished scene for Drood | 470-476 |
CHAPTER XIX. 1836-1870. | |
Pages 478-526. | |
Personal Characteristics. Age. 24-58. | |
Dickens not a bookish man | 479 |
Books and their critics | 479 |
Design of present book stated | 480 |
Dickens made to tell his own story | 480 |
Charge of personal obtrusiveness | 481 |
Lord Russell on Dickens's letters | 481 |
Shallower judgments | 481 |
Absence of self-conceit in Dickens | 482 |
Letter to youngest son | 483 |
As to religion and prayer | 485 |
Letter to a clergyman in 1856 | 485 |
Letter to a layman in 1870 | 486 |
Objection to posthumous honours | 487 |
[xiv]As to patronage of literature | 488 |
Vanity of human wishes | 488 |
As to writers and publishers | 489 |
Editorship of his weekly serials | 490 |
Work for his contributors | 491 |
Editorial troubles and pleasures | 493 |
Letter to an author | 493 |
Help to younger novelists | 495 |
Adelaide Procter's poetry | 495 |
Effect of periodical writing | 496 |
Proposed satirical papers | 497 |
Political opinions | 498 |
Not the man for Finsbury | 499 |
The Liverpool dinner in 1869 | 500 |
Reply to Lord Houghton | 501 |
Tribute to Lord Russell | 501 |
People governing and governed | 502 |
Alleged offers from her Majesty | 503 |
Silly Rigmarole | 504 |
The Queen sees him act (1857) | 505 |
Desires to hear him read (1858) | 506 |
Interview at the Palace (1870) | 507 |
What passed at the interview | 507 |
Dickens's grateful impression | 508 |
A hope at the close of life | 509 |
Games in Gadshill meadow | 510 |
Home enjoyments | 512 |
Habits of life everywhere | 513 |
Family dependence on him | 514 |
Carlyle's opinion of Dickens | 514 |
Street walks and London haunts | 515 |
Christmas Eve and Christmas Day | 517 |
The first attack of lameness | 518 |
Effect upon his dogs | 518 |
Why right things to be done | 519 |
Silent heroisms | 519 |
At social meetings | 520 |
Delight in "assumption" | 520 |
Humouring a joke | 522 |
Unlucky hits | 522 |
Ghost stories | 524 |
Predominant feeling of his life | 525 |
Sermon of the Master of Balliol | 525 |
CHAPTER XX. 1869-1870. | |
Pages 527-545. | |
The End. Æt. 57-58. | |
Last summer and autumn | 527 |
Showing London to a visitor | 528 |
His son Henry's scholarship | 529 |
Twelve more readings | 530 |
Medical attendance at them | 531 |
Excitement incident to them | 532 |
The Farewell | 533 |
Last public appearances | 535 |
At Royal Academy dinner | 535 |
Eulogy of Daniel Maclise | 536 |
Return of illness | 537 |
Our last meeting | 538 |
A noteworthy incident | 538 |
Last letter received from him | 539 |
Final days at Gadshill | 539 |
Wednesday the 8th of June | 540 |
Last piece of writing | 540 |
The 8th and 9th of June | 541 |
The general grief | 542 |
The burial | 544 |
Unbidden mourners | 544 |
The grave | 544 |
—————— | |
APPENDIX. | |
I. The Works of Charles Dickens | 547 |
II. The Last Will of Charles Dickens | 561 |
III. Corrections made in the later editions of the second volume of this work | 566 |
INDEX | 571 |
THE LIFE
OF
CHARLES DICKENS.
CHAPTER I.
DAVID COPPERFIELD AND BLEAK HOUSE.
1850-1853.
Dickens never stood so high in reputation as at the completion of Copperfield. The popularity it obtained at the outset increased to a degree not approached by any previous book excepting Pickwick. "You gratify me more than I can tell you," he wrote to Bulwer Lytton[22] (July 1850), "by what you say about Copperfield, because I hope myself that some heretofore deficient qualities are there." If the power was not greater than in Chuzzlewit, the subject had more attractiveness; there was more variety of incident, with a freer play of character; and there was withal a suspicion, which though general and vague had sharpened interest not a little, that underneath the fiction lay something of the author's life. How much, was not known by the world until he had passed away.
Dickens was never more highly regarded than when he finished Copperfield. The popularity it gained right from the start grew to a level not seen in any of his previous works, except for Pickwick. "You please me more than I can express," he wrote to Bulwer Lytton[22] (July 1850), "with what you say about Copperfield, because I hope that some qualities that were lacking before are present this time." If the strength of the writing wasn’t greater than in Chuzzlewit, the topic was definitely more appealing; it had a wider range of events, with more dynamic characters; and there was a lingering sense, though vague and general, that beneath the fiction lay elements of the author's own life. How much of it was true was not revealed to the world until after he had passed away.
To be acquainted with English literature is to know, that, into its most famous prose fiction, autobiography has entered largely in disguise, and that the characters most familiar to us in the English novel had originals in actual life. Smollett never wrote a story that was not in some degree a recollection of his own adventures; and Fielding, who put something of his wife into all his heroines, had been as fortunate in finding, not Trulliber only, but Parson Adams himself, among his living experiences. To come later down, there was hardly any one ever known to Scott of whom his memory had not treasured up something to give minuter reality to the people of his fancy; and we know exactly whom to look for in Dandie Dinmont and Jonathan Oldbuck, in the office of Alan Fairford and the sick room of Crystal Croftangry. We are to observe also that it is never anything complete that is thus taken from life by a genuine writer, but only leading traits, or such as may give greater finish; that the fine artist will embody in his portraiture of one person his experiences of fifty; and that this would have been Fielding's answer to Trulliber if he had objected to the pigstye, and to Adams if[23] he had sought to make a case of scandal out of the affair in Mrs. Slipslop's bedroom. Such questioning befell Dickens repeatedly in the course of his writings, where he freely followed, as we have seen, the method thus common to the masters in his art; but there was an instance of alleged wrong in the course of Copperfield where he felt his vindication to be hardly complete, and what he did thereupon was characteristic.
To be familiar with English literature means understanding that a lot of the most well-known prose fiction includes elements of autobiography, often disguised. The characters we recognize in English novels often have real-life counterparts. Smollett never wrote a story that wasn't at least partly based on his own experiences, and Fielding, who infused traits of his wife into all his heroines, was lucky to find living inspirations not just in Trulliber but also in Parson Adams himself. As we move forward in time, there's hardly anyone Scott encountered that he didn’t use as inspiration to add more depth to the characters of his imagination; we can pinpoint who inspired Dandie Dinmont and Jonathan Oldbuck, as well as the setting of Alan Fairford's office and the sickroom of Crystal Croftangry. It’s also important to note that when a true writer draws from real life, it’s never a complete picture but only key traits that enhance their work; a fine artist might capture in one person's portrait the essence of fifty experiences. This would have been Fielding’s response to Trulliber if he had complained about the pigsty and to Adams if he had tried to create a scandal over what happened in Mrs. Slipslop's bedroom. Dickens faced similar questions throughout his writing, as we've seen, following the common method of the masters before him. However, in a particular instance in Copperfield, he felt that his defense was not fully adequate, and his reaction was very telling.
"I have had the queerest adventure this morning," he wrote (28th of December 1849) on the eve of his tenth number, "the receipt of the enclosed from Miss Moucher! It is serio-comic, but there is no doubt one is wrong in being tempted to such a use of power." Thinking a grotesque little oddity among his acquaintance to be safe from recognition, he had done what Smollett did sometimes, but never Fielding, and given way, in the first outburst of fun that had broken out around the fancy, to the temptation of copying too closely peculiarities of figure and face amounting in effect to deformity. He was shocked at discovering the pain he had given, and a copy is before me of the assurances by way of reply which he at once sent to the complainant. That he was grieved and surprised beyond measure. That he had not intended her altogether. That all his characters, being made up out of many people, were composite, and never individual. That the chair (for table) and other matters were undoubtedly from her, but that other traits were not hers at all; and that in Miss Moucher's "Ain't I volatile" his friends had quite correctly recognized the favourite utterance of a different person. That he felt nevertheless he had done wrong, and would now do anything to[24] repair it. That he had intended to employ the character in an unpleasant way, but he would, whatever the risk or inconvenience, change it all, so that nothing but an agreeable impression should be left. The reader will remember how this was managed, and that the thirty-second chapter went far to undo what the twenty-second had done.
"I had the strangest adventure this morning," he wrote (December 28, 1849) on the eve of his tenth issue, "after receiving the attached note from Miss Moucher! It's both serious and funny, but there's no denying it's wrong to be tempted to misuse that kind of power." Believing a quirky little oddity among his acquaintances was safe from recognition, he did what Smollett sometimes did, but never Fielding, and gave in, during the initial burst of laughter that erupted around the idea, to the temptation of imitating too closely the unique features and quirks that amounted to what could be considered deformity. He was shocked to realize the hurt he had caused, and I have in front of me a copy of the reassurances he immediately sent to the complainant. He expressed that he was deeply saddened and surprised. That he hadn’t meant to portray her completely. That all his characters, made up of many people, were composite and never individual. That the chair (instead of a table) and other details were undoubtedly from her, but that other traits were not hers at all; and that in Miss Moucher's "Ain't I volatile," his friends had accurately recognized the favorite saying of someone else. However, he felt that he had done wrong and would now do anything to repair it. That he had meant to use the character in an unpleasant way, but he would, regardless of the risk or inconvenience, change everything so that only a positive impression would remain. The reader will recall how this was handled and that the thirty-second chapter largely fixed what the twenty-second had broken.
A much earlier instance is the only one known to me where a character in one of his books intended to be odious was copied wholly from a living original. The use of such material, never without danger, might have been justifiable here if anywhere, and he had himself a satisfaction in always admitting the identity of Mr. Fang in Oliver Twist with Mr. Laing of Hatton-garden. But the avowal of his purpose in that case, and his mode of setting about it, mark strongly a difference of procedure from that which, following great examples, he adopted in his later books. An allusion to a common friend in one of his letters of the present date—"A dreadful thought occurs to me! how brilliant in a book!"—expresses both the continued strength of his temptations and the dread he had brought himself to feel of immediately yielding to them; but he had no such misgivings in the days of Oliver Twist. Wanting an insolent and harsh police-magistrate, he bethought him of an original ready to his hand in one of the London offices; and instead of pursuing his later method of giving a personal appearance that should in some sort render difficult the identification of mental peculiarities, he was only eager to get in the whole man complete upon his page, figure and face as well as manners and mind.[25]
A much earlier example is the only one I know of where a character in one of his books, meant to be detestable, was completely taken from a real person. Using such material, which is always risky, might have been defended here more than elsewhere, and he took satisfaction in openly acknowledging that Mr. Fang in Oliver Twist was based on Mr. Laing from Hatton Garden. However, his admission of his intent in that case, along with how he approached it, clearly shows a change in his method compared to what he adopted in his later works, inspired by great examples. A mention of a mutual friend in one of his recent letters—"A terrifying idea just hit me! How brilliant in a book!"—shows both the ongoing allure of his temptations and the fear he had developed about giving in to them right away; but he had no such concerns back in the days of Oliver Twist. In need of a rude and harsh police magistrate, he thought of a real person conveniently available from one of the London offices; and instead of following his later approach of creating a persona that would somewhat obscure the identification of mental traits, he was simply eager to capture the entire individual fully on the page, including their appearance, demeanor, and mindset.[25]
He wrote accordingly (from Doughty-street on the 3rd of June 1837) to Mr. Haines,[164] a gentleman who then had general supervision over the police reports for the daily papers. "In my next number of Oliver Twist I must have a magistrate; and, casting about for a magistrate whose harshness and insolence would render him a fit subject to be shown up, I have as a necessary consequence stumbled upon Mr. Laing of Hatton-garden celebrity. I know the man's character perfectly well; but as it would be necessary to describe his personal appearance also, I ought to have seen him, which (fortunately or unfortunately as the case may be) I have never done. In this dilemma it occurred to me that perhaps I might under your auspices be smuggled into the Hatton-garden office for a few moments some morning. If you can further my object I shall be really very greatly obliged to you." The opportunity was found; the magistrate was brought up before the novelist; and shortly after, on some fresh outbreak of intolerable temper, the home-secretary found it an easy and popular step to remove Mr. Laing from the bench.
He wrote accordingly (from Doughty Street on June 3, 1837) to Mr. Haines,[164], a gentleman who then oversaw the police reports for the daily papers. "In my next issue of Oliver Twist, I need a magistrate, and while looking for one whose harshness and arrogance would make him a suitable target to be exposed, I’ve come across Mr. Laing, famous for his work in Hatton Garden. I know the man’s character quite well; however, as I'll also need to describe his appearance, I should have seen him, which (whether fortunate or unfortunate, depending on how you look at it) I never have. In this situation, it occurred to me that perhaps I might be able to sneak into the Hatton Garden office for a few minutes one morning under your guidance. If you can help me with this, I would be truly grateful." The opportunity arose; the magistrate was brought before the novelist; and shortly afterward, following some fresh outburst of unbearable temperament, the home secretary found it an easy and popular decision to remove Mr. Laing from the bench.
This was a comfort to everybody, saving only the principal person; but the instance was highly exceptional, and it rarely indeed happens that to the individual objection natural in every such case some consideration should not be paid. In the book that followed Copperfield, two characters appeared having resemblances in manner and speech to two distinguished writers too vivid to be mistaken by their personal[26] friends. To Lawrence Boythorn, under whom Landor figured, no objection was made; but Harold Skimpole, recognizable for Leigh Hunt, led to much remark; the difference being, that ludicrous traits were employed in the first to enrich without impairing an attractive person in the tale, whereas to the last was assigned a part in the plot which no fascinating foibles or gaieties of speech could redeem from contempt. Though a want of consideration was thus shown to the friend whom the character would be likely to recall to many readers, it is nevertheless very certain that the intention of Dickens was not at first, or at any time, an unkind one. He erred from thoughtlessness only. What led him to the subject at all, he has himself stated. Hunt's philosophy of moneyed obligations, always, though loudly, half jocosely proclaimed, and his ostentatious wilfulness in the humouring of that or any other theme on which he cared for the time to expatiate,[165] had so often seemed to Dickens to be whimsical[27] and attractive that, wanting an "airy quality" for the man he invented, this of Hunt occurred to him; and "partly for that reason, and partly, he has since often grieved to think, for the pleasure it afforded to find a delightful manner reproducing itself under his hand, he yielded to the temptation of too often making the character speak like his old friend." This apology was made[166] after Hunt's death, and mentioned a revision of the first sketch, so as to render it less like, at the suggestion of two other friends of Hunt. The friends were Procter (Barry Cornwall) and myself; the feeling having been mine from the first that the likeness was too like. Procter did not immediately think so, but a little reflection brought him to that opinion. "You will see from the enclosed," Dickens wrote (17th of March 1852), "that Procter is much of my mind. I will nevertheless go through the character again in the course of the afternoon, and soften down words here and there." But before the day closed Procter had again written to him, and next morning this was the[28] result. "I have again gone over every part of it very carefully, and I think I have made it much less like. I have also changed Leonard to Harold. I have no right to give Hunt pain, and I am so bent upon not doing it that I wish you would look at all the proof once more, and indicate any particular place in which you feel it particularly like. Whereupon I will alter that place."
This reassured everyone except the main person involved; however, this was a rare exception, and it hardly ever happens that some consideration isn’t given to the individual objections that are natural in every such case. In the book that followed Copperfield, two characters emerged that resembled two famous writers in their manner and speech too distinctly to be mistaken by their personal[26] friends. No one raised objections regarding Lawrence Boythorn, the character representing Landor, but Harold Skimpole, who was clearly modeled after Leigh Hunt, drew a lot of attention; the difference being that humorous traits were used in the first character to enhance, rather than diminish, an appealing figure in the story, whereas the latter was given a role in the plot that no charming quirks or witty dialogue could save from disdain. Although a lack of consideration was shown to the friend whom many readers were likely to think of, it is important to note that Dickens’ intention was never mean-spirited at any point. He simply made a mistake out of thoughtlessness. He himself noted what led him to the subject. Hunt's philosophy about financial responsibilities, always loudly but half-jokingly proclaimed, along with his flashy stubbornness in indulging on that or any other topic that interested him at the time,[165] had often struck Dickens as whimsical[27] and appealing that when he needed an "airy quality" for the character he created, he thought of Hunt; "partly for that reason, and partly, as he often regretted later, for the enjoyment it gave him to see a delightful style coming together under his hand, he gave in to the temptation of having the character speak like his old friend." This explanation was offered[166] after Hunt's death and addressed a revision of the original sketch to make it less similar, at the suggestion of two other friends of Hunt. The friends were Procter (Barry Cornwall) and me; I had felt from the start that the likeness was too strong. Procter didn’t think so at first, but after some consideration, he changed his mind. "You will see from the enclosed," Dickens wrote (17th of March 1852), "that Procter agrees with me. I will still revise the character this afternoon and soften some words here and there." But before the day ended, Procter wrote to him again, and the next morning this was the[28] result. "I have reviewed every part of it very carefully, and I believe I’ve made it much less similar. I also changed Leonard to Harold. I have no right to cause Hunt pain, and I’m so determined not to do that, I wish you would look at all the proofs again and point out any specific areas where you feel it resembles him too much. I will then change those parts."
Upon the whole the alterations were considerable, but the radical wrong remained. The pleasant sparkling airy talk, which could not be mistaken, identified with odious qualities a friend only known to the writer by attractive ones; and for this there was no excuse. Perhaps the only person acquainted with the original who failed to recognize the copy, was the original himself (a common case); but good-natured friends in time told Hunt everything, and painful explanations followed, where nothing was possible to Dickens but what amounted to a friendly evasion of the points really at issue. The time for redress had gone. I yet well remember with what eager earnestness, on one of these occasions, he strove to set Hunt up again in his own esteem. "Separate in your own mind," he said to him, "what you see of yourself from what other people tell you that they see. As it has given you so much pain, I take it at its worst, and say I am deeply sorry, and that I feel I did wrong in doing it. I should otherwise have taken it at its best, and ridden off upon what I strongly feel to be the truth, that there is nothing in it that should have given you pain. Every one in writing must speak from points of his experience, and so I of mine with you: but when I have felt it was[29] going too close I stopped myself, and the most blotted parts of my MS. are those in which I have been striving hard to make the impression I was writing from, unlike you. The diary-writing I took from Haydon, not from you. I now first learn from yourself that you ever set anything to music, and I could not have copied that from you. The character is not you, for there are traits in it common to fifty thousand people besides, and I did not fancy you would ever recognize it. Under similar disguises my own father and mother are in my books, and you might as well see your likeness in Micawber." The distinction is that the foibles of Mr. Micawber and of Mrs. Nickleby, however laughable, make neither of them in speech or character less loveable; and that this is not to be said of Skimpole's. The kindly or unkindly impression makes all the difference where liberties are taken with a friend; and even this entirely favourable condition will not excuse the practice to many, where near relatives are concerned.
Overall, the changes were significant, but the fundamental issue remained. The lively and engaging conversation, unmistakably tied to unpleasant traits, identified someone whom the writer only saw positively; and there was no justification for that. Perhaps the only person familiar with the original who didn't recognize the copy was the original himself (which is common); but well-meaning friends eventually told Hunt everything, leading to awkward explanations, where Dickens could only respond with friendly avoidance of the real issues. The opportunity for remedy had passed. I still vividly remember how earnestly, on one of these occasions, he tried to restore Hunt's self-esteem. "Separate in your own mind," he advised him, "what you see in yourself from what others say they see. Since it has caused you so much pain, I’ll take it as seriously as possible and say I’m very sorry, and I feel I was wrong in doing it. Otherwise, I would have viewed it more positively and gone along with what I genuinely believe to be the truth, that there’s nothing in it that should have hurt you. Everyone who writes has to draw from their own experiences, and I did with you: but when I felt I was getting too close, I held back, and the messiest parts of my manuscript are those where I tried hard to ensure the impression I was writing from was unlike you. I got the idea of diary-writing from Haydon, not from you. I’m now learning from you for the first time that you ever set anything to music, and that’s something I couldn’t have copied from you. The character isn’t you, since it has traits common to thousands of others, and I didn’t think you would ever see yourself in it. My own parents appear in my books under similar disguises, and you might as well find your likeness in Micawber." The key difference is that the quirks of Mr. Micawber and Mrs. Nickleby, while humorous, don’t make either of them less lovable in speech or character; and that can't be said about Skimpole's traits. The way someone feels—whether kindly or unkindly—makes all the difference when liberties are taken with a friend; and even this entirely positive situation can’t justify the practice for many when it involves close relatives.
For what formerly was said of the Micawber resemblances, Dickens has been sharply criticized; and in like manner it was thought objectionable in Scott that for the closing scenes of Crystal Croftangry he should have found the original of his fretful patient at the death-bed of his own father. Lockhart, who tells us this, adds with a sad significance that he himself lived to see the curtain fall at Abbotsford upon even such another scene. But to no purpose will such objections still be made. All great novelists will continue to use their experiences of nature and fact, whencesoever derivable; and a remark made to Lockhart by Scott himself suggests their vindication. "If a man will paint[30] from nature, he will be most likely to interest and amuse those who are daily looking at it."
For what was previously said about the similarities to the Micawber character, Dickens has faced sharp criticism; similarly, it was seen as a problem for Scott that he found inspiration for the final scenes of Crystal Croftangry from the deathwatch of his own father. Lockhart, who shares this, notes with a heavy heart that he himself witnessed the curtain falling at Abbotsford on another scene just like that. But these objections will no longer hold any weight. All great novelists will keep drawing from their experiences of nature and reality, wherever they may come from; and a comment made to Lockhart by Scott himself supports their justification. "If a man paints from nature, he is most likely to engage and entertain those who see it every day."
The Micawber offence otherwise was not grave. We have seen in what way Dickens was moved or inspired by the rough lessons of his boyhood, and the groundwork of the character was then undoubtedly laid; but the rhetorical exuberance impressed itself upon him later, and from this, as it expanded and developed in a thousand amusing ways, the full-length figure took its great charm. Better illustration of it could not perhaps be given than by passages from letters of Dickens, written long before Micawber was thought of, in which this peculiarity of his father found frequent and always agreeable expression. Several such have been given in this work from time to time, and one or two more may here be added. It is proper to preface them by saying that no one could know the elder Dickens without secretly liking him the better for these flourishes of speech, which adapted themselves so readily to his gloom as well as to his cheerfulness, that it was difficult not to fancy they had helped him considerably in both, and had rendered more tolerable to him, if also more possible, the shade and sunshine of his chequered life. "If you should have an opportunity pendente lite, as my father would observe—indeed did on some memorable ancient occasions when he informed me that the ban-dogs would shortly have him at bay"—Dickens wrote in December 1847. "I have a letter from my father" (May 1841) "lamenting the fine weather, invoking congenial tempests, and informing me that it will not be possible for him to stay more than another year in Devonshire, as he must then proceed to Paris to consolidate[31] Augustus's French." "There has arrived," he writes from the Peschiere in September 1844, "a characteristic letter for Kate from my father. He dates it Manchester, and says he has reason to believe that he will be in town with the pheasants, on or about the first of October. He has been with Fanny in the Isle of Man for nearly two months: finding there, as he goes on to observe, troops of friends, and every description of continental luxury at a cheap rate." Describing in the same year the departure from Genoa of an English physician and acquaintance, he adds: "We are very sorry to lose the benefit of his advice—or, as my father would say, to be deprived, to a certain extent, of the concomitant advantages, whatever they may be, resulting from his medical skill, such as it is, and his professional attendance, in so far as it may be so considered." Thus also it delighted Dickens to remember that it was of one of his connections his father wrote a celebrated sentence; "And I must express my tendency to believe that his longevity is (to say the least of it) extremely problematical:" and that it was to another, who had been insisting somewhat obtrusively on dissenting and nonconformist superiorities, he addressed words which deserve to be no less celebrated; "The Supreme Being must be an entirely different individual from what I have every reason to believe him to be, if He would care in the least for the society of your relations." There was a laugh in the enjoyment of all this, no doubt, but with it much personal fondness; and the feeling of the creator of Micawber as he thus humoured and remembered the foibles of his original, found its counterpart in that of[32] his readers for the creation itself, as its part was played out in the story. Nobody likes Micawber less for his follies; and Dickens liked his father more, the more he recalled his whimsical qualities. "The longer I live, the better man I think him," he exclaimed afterwards. The fact and the fancy had united whatever was most grateful to him in both.
The Micawber offense wasn't that serious. We've seen how Dickens was influenced by the tough lessons of his childhood, and the foundation of this character was definitely established back then; however, the rhetorical flair became more prominent later, and as it grew and developed in countless entertaining ways, the full character gained its great appeal. Perhaps the best examples of this can be found in some of Dickens's letters, written long before Micawber was conceived, where his father’s unique style often shone through in a charming way. A few of those have been shared throughout this work, and I’ll add a couple more here. It's important to mention that anyone who knew the elder Dickens couldn't help but like him more for these expressive speeches, which fit his gloomy as well as cheerful moments. It’s hard not to think they helped him cope significantly with both, making the ups and downs of his varied life a bit more bearable. "If you should have an opportunity pendente lite, as my father would say—indeed did say on some memorable occasions when he informed me that the ban-dogs would soon have him cornered," Dickens wrote in December 1847. "I have a letter from my father" (May 1841) "bemoaning the lovely weather, wishing for wild storms, and letting me know that he couldn’t stay more than another year in Devonshire because he would then need to go to Paris to improve Augustus's French." "A characteristic letter for Kate has arrived from my father," he writes from the Peschiere in September 1844, "He dates it Manchester and mentions he has reason to believe he’ll be in town with the pheasants around the beginning of October. He has been with Fanny in the Isle of Man for almost two months, discovering, as he goes on to say, crowds of friends and all kinds of continental luxury at bargain prices." Describing the departure from Genoa of an English doctor and acquaintance that same year, he adds: "We are really sorry to lose the benefit of his advice—or, as my father would put it, to miss, to some degree, the accompanying advantages, whatever they may be, stemming from his medical expertise, such as it is, and his professional care, in so far as it can be considered that." Dickens also enjoyed recalling a famous line his father wrote about one of their relatives; "And I must express my tendency to believe that his longevity is (to say the least of it) extremely doubtful:" and to another, who had been rather pushy about the merits of dissenting and nonconformist beliefs, his father wrote words that deserve just as much recognition; "The Supreme Being must be a completely different individual from what I have every reason to believe him to be, if He would care at all for the company of your relatives." There was certainly laughter in all this, but also a lot of personal affection; and the feeling of the creator of Micawber, as he humorously remembered his father's quirks, mirrored that of his readers toward the character itself as his role unfolded in the story. Nobody likes Micawber less for his flaws; in fact, Dickens appreciated his father even more the more he reflected on his whimsical traits. "The longer I live, the better man I think him," he later exclaimed. The reality and the imagination combined everything he valued most in both.
It is a tribute to the generally healthful and manly tone of the story of Copperfield that such should be the outcome of the eccentricities of this leading personage in it; and the superiority in this respect of Micawber over Skimpole is one of many indications of the inferiority of Bleak House to its predecessor. With leading resemblances that make it difficult to say which character best represents the principle or no principle of impecuniosity, there cannot be any doubt which has the advantage in moral and intellectual development. It is genuine humour against personal satire. Between the worldly circumstances of the two, there is nothing to choose; but as to everything else it is the difference between shabbiness and greatness. Skimpole's sunny talk might be expected to please as much as Micawber's gorgeous speech, the design of both being to take the edge off poverty. But in the one we have no relief from attendant meanness or distress, and we drop down from the airiest fancies into sordidness and pain; whereas in the other nothing pitiful or merely selfish ever touches us. At its lowest depth of what is worst, we never doubt that something better must turn up; and of a man who sells his bedstead that he may entertain his friend, we altogether refuse to think nothing but badly. This is throughout the[33] free and cheery style of Copperfield. The masterpieces of Dickens's humour are not in it; but he has nowhere given such variety of play to his invention, and the book is unapproached among his writings for its completeness of effect and uniform pleasantness of tone.
It’s a testament to the generally healthy and strong vibe of the story of Copperfield that this is the result of the quirks of its main character; and the superiority of Micawber over Skimpole in this regard is one of many signs that Bleak House falls short compared to its predecessor. With significant similarities that make it hard to determine which character best embodies the concept—or lack thereof—of being broke, there’s no question about which character has the upper hand when it comes to moral and intellectual growth. It's genuine humor versus personal criticism. When it comes to their life situations, they’re pretty much equal; but in every other way, it’s the difference between being shabby and being great. Skimpole's bright talk might seem as enjoyable as Micawber's impressive speech, as both aim to soften the blow of poverty. But with one, we find no escape from the surrounding meanness or distress, falling from light-hearted ideas into squalor and pain; while with the other, nothing pitiful or merely selfish ever touches us. Even at its worst, we never doubt that something better will come along; and of a man who sells his bed to host his friend, we refuse to think of him in any bad light. This is the consistently uplifting and cheerful style of Copperfield. The highlights of Dickens's humor aren’t found here; but he’s never shown such a range of creativity, and this book is unmatched in his works for its overall effectiveness and consistently pleasant tone.
What has to be said hereafter of those writings generally, will properly restrict what is said here, as in previous instances, mainly to personal illustration. The Copperfield disclosures formerly made will for ever connect the book with the author's individual story; but too much has been assumed, from those revelations, of a full identity of Dickens with his hero, and of a supposed intention that his own character as well as parts of his career should be expressed in the narrative. It is right to warn the reader as to this. He can judge for himself how far the childish experiences are likely to have given the turn to Dickens's genius; whether their bitterness had so burnt into his nature, as, in the hatred of oppression, the revolt against abuse of power, and the war with injustice under every form displayed in his earliest books, to have reproduced itself only; and to what extent mere compassion for his own childhood may account for the strange fascination always exerted over him by child-suffering and sorrow. But, many as are the resemblances in Copperfield's adventures to portions of those of Dickens, and often as reflections occur to David which no one intimate with Dickens could fail to recognize as but the reproduction of his, it would be the greatest mistake to imagine anything like a complete identity of the fictitious novelist with the real one, beyond the Hungerford scenes; or to suppose that the youth, who then received[34] his first harsh schooling in life, came out of it as little harmed or hardened as David did. The language of the fiction reflects only faintly the narrative of the actual fact; and the man whose character it helped to form was expressed not less faintly in the impulsive impressionable youth, incapable of resisting the leading of others, and only disciplined into self-control by the later griefs of his entrance into manhood. Here was but another proof how thoroughly Dickens understood his calling, and that to weave fact with fiction unskilfully would be only to make truth less true.
What needs to be addressed about those writings in general will mainly restrict what is discussed here, as in previous cases, to personal examples. The disclosures in Copperfield will forever link the book to the author's own story; however, too much has been inferred from those revelations about a complete identification of Dickens with his protagonist, as well as a supposed intention for both his character and parts of his life to be reflected in the narrative. It's important to caution the reader about this. They can determine for themselves how much the childhood experiences likely influenced Dickens's talent; whether their bitterness was so deeply ingrained in his nature that it manifested only in his deep hatred of oppression, his resistance to abuse of power, and his fight against injustice in all its forms, which he portrayed in his earliest works; and to what extent simple compassion for his own childhood may explain the unusual fascination he always felt for the suffering and sorrow of children. While there are many similarities between Copperfield's adventures and those of Dickens, and often David reflects thoughts that anyone familiar with Dickens would recognize as merely mirroring his own, it would be a huge mistake to think there is a complete identification between the fictional novelist and the real one beyond the Hungerford scenes; or to believe that the young person who first faced harsh lessons of life emerged from it as unscathed or unhardened as David did. The language of the fiction only faintly echoes the narrative of the actual events; and the man whose character it helped shape was expressed just as faintly in the impulsive, impressionable youth, who was incapable of resisting the influence of others and only learned self-discipline through the later griefs of his transition into adulthood. This serves as further proof of how well Dickens understood his craft, and that poorly blending fact with fiction would only make truth less accurate.
The character of the hero of the novel finds indeed his right place in the story he is supposed to tell, rather by unlikeness than by likeness to Dickens, even where intentional resemblance might seem to be prominent. Take autobiography as a design to show that any man's life may be as a mirror of existence to all men, and the individual career becomes altogether secondary to the variety of experiences received and rendered back in it. This particular form in imaginative literature has too often led to the indulgence of mental analysis, metaphysics, and sentiment, all in excess: but Dickens was carried safely over these allurements by a healthy judgment and sleepless creative fancy; and even the method of his narrative is more simple here than it generally is in his books. His imaginative growths have less luxuriance of underwood, and the crowds of external images always rising so vividly before him are more within control.
The hero of the novel truly finds his place in the story he’s meant to tell, more through differences than similarities to Dickens, even when intentional likeness appears to stand out. Consider autobiography as a way to show that any person's life can reflect existence for everyone, making individual stories secondary to the variety of experiences shared and expressed within them. This specific approach in imaginative literature has often led to excessive focus on mental analysis, metaphysics, and sentiment; however, Dickens navigated these temptations with sound judgment and relentless creativity, and even his narrative style here is simpler than it usually is in his works. His imaginative creations have less overgrowth, and the multitude of vivid external images he always envisions are more manageable.
Consider Copperfield thus in his proper place in the story, and sequence as well as connection will be given to the varieties of its childish adventure. The first[35] warm nest of love in which his vain fond mother, and her quaint kind servant, cherish him; the quick-following contrast of hard dependence and servile treatment; the escape from that premature and dwarfed maturity by natural relapse into a more perfect childhood; the then leisurely growth of emotions and faculties into manhood; these are component parts of a character consistently drawn. The sum of its achievement is to be a successful cultivation of letters; and often as such imaginary discipline has been the theme of fiction, there are not many happier conceptions of it. The ideal and real parts of the boy's nature receive development in the proportions which contribute best to the end desired; the readiness for impulsive attachments that had put him into the leading of others, has underneath it a base of truthfulness on which at last he rests in safety; the practical man is the outcome of the fanciful youth; and a more than equivalent for the graces of his visionary days, is found in the active sympathies that life has opened to him. Many experiences have come within its range, and his heart has had room for all. Our interest in him cannot but be increased by knowing how much he expresses of what the author had himself gone through; but David includes far less than this, and infinitely more.
Think of Copperfield in his rightful place in the story, and you'll see how the different parts of his childhood adventures connect and unfold. First, there’s the warm nest of love with his vain mother and her quirky, kind servant who care for him; then, there's the stark contrast of harsh dependence and servile treatment. He escapes from an early, stunted maturity by naturally returning to a more complete childhood. This gradual development of his emotions and abilities into manhood comprises a well-crafted character. His main achievement is successfully pursuing education, and even though fictional portrayals of such discipline abound, few are as joyful as this one. The ideal and real elements of the boy's nature grow in the right proportions for the desired outcome; his readiness for impulsive relationships, which often leads him to follow others, is grounded in a base of truthfulness that ultimately keeps him secure. The practical man that emerges is a product of his imaginative youth, and he finds in the active sympathies that life has opened to him a more than adequate compensation for the charms of his dream-filled days. He has encountered many experiences, and his heart has room for them all. Our interest in him only deepens when we realize how much he reflects what the author himself experienced; yet, David encompasses far less than that, and infinitely more.
That the incidents arise easily, and to the very end connect themselves naturally and unobtrusively with the characters of which they are a part, is to be said perhaps more truly of this than of any other of Dickens's novels. There is a profusion of distinct and distinguishable people, and a prodigal wealth of detail; but unity of drift or purpose is apparent always, and[36] the tone is uniformly right. By the course of the events we learn the value of self-denial and patience, quiet endurance of unavoidable ills, strenuous effort against ills remediable; and everything in the fortunes of the actors warns us, to strengthen our generous emotions and to guard the purities of home. It is easy thus to account for the supreme popularity of Copperfield, without the addition that it can hardly have had a reader, man or lad, who did not discover that he was something of a Copperfield himself. Childhood and youth live again for all of us in its marvellous boy-experiences. Mr. Micawber's presence must not prevent my saying that it does not take the lead of the other novels in humorous creation; but in the use of humour to bring out prominently the ludicrous in any object or incident without excluding or weakening its most enchanting sentiment, it stands decidedly first. It is the perfection of English mirth. We are apt to resent the exhibition of too much goodness, but it is here so qualified by oddity as to become not merely palatable but attractive; and even pathos is heightened by what in other hands would only make it comical. That there are also faults in the book is certain, but none that are incompatible with the most masterly qualities; and a book becomes everlasting by the fact, not that faults are not in it, but that genius nevertheless is there.
The way the events unfold naturally and seamlessly connect with the characters is perhaps more true for this novel than for any other by Dickens. There’s a wide array of distinct and recognizable characters and an abundance of detail, but there’s always a clear sense of direction and purpose, and the tone is consistently appropriate. Through the events, we understand the importance of self-denial and patience, the quiet endurance of unavoidable hardships, and the vigorous effort to combat challenges that can be fixed. The experiences of the characters encourage us to nurture our generous feelings and protect the sanctity of home. This explains the immense popularity of Copperfield, as it’s hard to find a reader—man or boy—who doesn’t see a bit of themselves in Copperfield. Childhood and youth come alive for all of us through its incredible boyhood experiences. Mr. Micawber's presence shouldn’t overshadow the fact that it may not lead in terms of humor compared to other novels, but when it comes to using humor to highlight the ridiculous in any situation while still maintaining its captivating sentiment, it definitely comes out on top. It embodies the essence of English humor. We often get annoyed by excessive goodness, but here it’s tempered by quirkiness, making it not just enjoyable but appealing; even the emotional moments are intensified in ways that might seem comedic in other contexts. While it’s clear the book has its faults, none of them diminish its masterful qualities; a book endures not by being without flaws, but because it still showcases genius.
Of its method, and its author's generally, in the delineation of character, something will have to be said on a later page. The author's own favourite people in it, I think, were the Peggotty group; and perhaps he was not far wrong. It has been their fate, as with all the leading figures of his invention, to pass their names[37] into the language, and become types; and he has nowhere given happier embodiment to that purity of homely goodness, which, by the kindly and all-reconciling influences of humour, may exalt into comeliness and even grandeur the clumsiest forms of humanity. What has been indicated in the style of the book as its greatest charm is here felt most strongly. The ludicrous so helps the pathos, and the humour so uplifts and refines the sentiment, that mere rude affection and simple manliness in these Yarmouth boatmen, passed through the fires of unmerited suffering and heroic endurance, take forms half-chivalrous half-sublime. It is one of the cants of critical superiority to make supercilious mention of the serious passages in this great writer; but the storm and shipwreck at the close of Copperfield, when the body of the seducer is flung dead upon the shore amid the ruins of the home he has wasted and by the side of the man whose heart he has broken, the one as unconscious of what he had failed to reach as the other of what he has perished to save, is a description that may compare with the most impressive in the language. There are other people drawn into this catastrophe who are among the failures of natural delineation in the book. But though Miss Dartle is curiously unpleasant, there are some natural traits in her (which Dickens's least life-like people are never without); and it was from one of his lady friends, very familiar to him indeed, he copied her peculiarity of never saying anything outright, but hinting it merely, and making more of it that way. Of Mrs. Steerforth it may also be worth remembering that Thackeray had something of a fondness for her. "I knew how it[38] would be when I began," says a pleasant letter all about himself written immediately after she appeared in the story. "My letters to my mother are like this, but then she likes 'em—like Mrs. Steerforth: don't you like Mrs. Steerforth?"
Of its method, and of the author's approach in portraying character, more will be said later. The author's favorite characters, I believe, were the Peggotty family; and perhaps he was onto something. Like all his main characters, they have entered the language and become archetypes; he portrays that simplicity and genuine goodness in a way that, through the uplifting and harmonious power of humor, elevates even the most awkward forms of humanity into something beautiful and even grand. The charm noted in the style of the book is most strongly felt here. The ridiculous enhances the emotional depth, and the humor elevates and refines the sentiment, so that the raw affection and basic decency of these Yarmouth fishermen, having endured unearned suffering and demonstrated heroic resilience, take on forms that are both noble and sublime. It's a common critique to condescendingly point out the serious moments in this great author's works; however, the storm and shipwreck at the end of Copperfield, where the body of the seducer is cast lifeless onto the shore amid the ruins of the home he destroyed, beside the man whose heart he shattered—both unaware of what has been lost and what has been sacrificed—is a depiction that rivals the most powerful in the language. There are other characters wrapped up in this tragic event who don't quite fit the natural depiction in the book. Although Miss Dartle is notably unpleasant, she has some genuine traits (which even Dickens's least realistic characters possess); he based her characteristic of never stating anything plainly, but hinting at it and making it more profound, on one of his female friends who was very close to him. It might also be worth noting that Thackeray had some affection for Mrs. Steerforth. "I knew how it would be when I started," says a delightful letter about himself written right after she appeared in the story. "My letters to my mother are like this, but she enjoys them—like Mrs. Steerforth: don't you like Mrs. Steerforth?"
Turning to another group there is another elderly lady to be liked without a shadow of misgiving; abrupt, angular, extravagant, but the very soul of magnanimity and rectitude; a character thoroughly made out in all its parts; a gnarled and knotted piece of female timber, sound to the core; a woman Captain Shandy would have loved for her startling oddities, and who is linked to the gentlest of her sex by perfect womanhood. Dickens has done nothing better, for solidness and truth all round, than Betsey Trotwood. It is one of her oddities to have a fool for a companion; but this is one of them that has also most pertinence and wisdom. By a line thrown out in Wilhelm Meister, that the true way of treating the insane was, in all respects possible, to act to them as if they were sane, Goethe anticipated what it took a century to apply to the most terrible disorder of humanity; and what Mrs. Trotwood does for Mr. Dick goes a step farther, by showing how often asylums might be dispensed with, and how large might be the number of deficient intellects manageable with patience in their own homes. Characters hardly less distinguishable for truth as well as oddity are the kind old nurse and her husband the carrier, whose vicissitudes alike of love and of mortality are condensed into the three words since become part of universal speech, Barkis is willin'. There is wholesome satire of much utility in the conversion of the brutal schoolmaster of the earlier scenes[39] into the tender Middlesex magistrate at the close. Nor is the humour anywhere more subtle than in the country undertaker, who makes up in fullness of heart for scantness of breath, and has so little of the vampire propensity of the town undertaker in Chuzzlewit, that he dares not even inquire after friends who are ill for fear of unkindly misconstruction. The test of a master in creative fiction, according to Hazlitt, is less in contrasting characters that are unlike than in distinguishing those that are like; and to many examples of the art in Dickens, such as the Shepherd and Chadband, Creakle and Squeers, Charley Bates and the Dodger, the Guppys and the Wemmicks, Mr. Jaggers and Mr. Vholes, Sampson Brass and Conversation Kenge, Jack Bunsby, Captain Cuttle, and Bill Barley, the Perkers and Pells, the Dodsons and Fogs, Sarah Gamp and Betsy Prig, and a host of others, is to be added the nicety of distinction between those eminent furnishers of funerals, Mr. Mould and Messrs. Omer and Joram. All the mixed mirth and sadness of the story are skilfully drawn into the handling of this portion of it; and, amid wooings and preparations for weddings and church-ringing bells for baptisms, the steadily-going rat-tat of the hammer on the coffin is heard.
Turning to another group, there's an elderly woman who’s easy to like without any doubt; she’s abrupt, sharp-edged, extravagant, but the very essence of generosity and integrity. Her character is fully formed in every way; she's a gnarled and twisted piece of female timber, solid to the core. Captain Shandy would have adored her for her surprising quirks, and she’s connected to the gentlest of women through her perfect femininity. Dickens hasn’t done better for sheer reliability and truth than with Betsey Trotwood. One of her quirks is having a fool for a companion, but this is one that’s both relevant and wise. In a line from Wilhelm Meister, Goethe suggested that the best way to treat the insane is, whenever possible, to act as if they are sane. He foresaw what would take a century to understand about humanity's most terrible disorders; and what Mrs. Trotwood does for Mr. Dick takes it a step further, showing how often asylums could be avoided and how many individuals with intellectual challenges could be cared for at home with patience. Characters equally striking for both truth and eccentricity include the kind old nurse and her husband, the carrier, whose experiences of love and loss are summed up in the three words that have entered common language, Barkis is willin'. There's a healthy dose of satire in transforming the harsh schoolmaster from the early scenes[39] into the gentle Middlesex magistrate at the end. The humor is also particularly subtle in the country undertaker, who compensates for his lack of breath with a big heart, and shows so little of the predatory nature of the town undertaker in Chuzzlewit that he won’t even ask about sick friends for fear of being misunderstood. According to Hazlitt, a master in creative fiction stands out less in contrasting unlike characters than in distinguishing those that are similar; and numerous examples of this skill in Dickens, like the Shepherd and Chadband, Creakle and Squeers, Charley Bates and the Dodger, the Guppys and the Wemmicks, Mr. Jaggers and Mr. Vholes, Sampson Brass and Conversation Kenge, Jack Bunsby, Captain Cuttle, and Bill Barley, the Perkers and Pells, the Dodsons and Fogs, Sarah Gamp and Betsy Prig, and many others, include the fine distinction between the well-known funeral providers, Mr. Mould and Messrs. Omer and Joram. All the mixed humor and sadness in the story are skillfully woven into this part of it; and amidst courtships, wedding plans, and church bells ringing for baptisms, the steady knock of the hammer on the coffin is heard.
Of the heroines who divide so equally between them the impulsive, easily swayed, not disloyal but sorely distracted affections of the hero, the spoilt foolishness and tenderness of the loving little child-wife, Dora, is more attractive than the too unfailing wisdom and self-sacrificing goodness of the angel-wife, Agnes. The scenes of the courtship and housekeeping are matchless; and the glimpses of Doctors' Commons, opening[40] those views, by Mr. Spenlow, of man's vanity of expectation and inconsistency of conduct in neglecting the sacred duty of making a will, on which he largely moralizes the day before he dies intestate, form a background highly appropriate to David's domesticities. This was among the reproductions of personal experience in the book; but it was a sadder knowledge that came with the conviction some years later, that David's contrasts in his earliest married life between his happiness enjoyed and his happiness once anticipated, the "vague unhappy loss or want of something" of which he so frequently complains, reflected also a personal experience which had not been supplied in fact so successfully as in fiction. (A closing word may perhaps be allowed, to connect with Devonshire-terrace the last book written there. On the page opposite is engraved a drawing by Maclise of the house where so many of Dickens's masterpieces were composed, done on the first anniversary of the day when his daughter Kate was born.)
Of the heroines who share the hero's impulsive, easily influenced, but not disloyal affections, the spoiled naivety and tenderness of the loving little child-wife, Dora, is more appealing than the unwavering wisdom and self-sacrificing goodness of the angelic wife, Agnes. The scenes of courtship and domestic life are unmatched; and the insights into Doctors' Commons, showcasing Mr. Spenlow's views on human vanity and the inconsistency of neglecting the important duty of making a will—which he reflects on the day before he dies without one—create a fitting backdrop for David's domestic life. This was one of the portrayals of personal experience in the book; however, it was a more sorrowful understanding that came years later, realizing that David's contrasts in his early married life between the happiness he experienced and the happiness he once expected, along with the "vague unhappy loss or want of something" he often laments, also reflected a personal experience that hadn't been as successfully lived as it had been fictionalized. (A final note can be made to connect Devonshire Terrace with the last book written there. On the opposite page is a drawing by Maclise of the house where many of Dickens's masterpieces were created, done on the first anniversary of the day his daughter Kate was born.)
Bleak House followed Copperfield, which in some respects it copied in the autobiographical form by means of extracts from the personal relation of its heroine. But the distinction between the narrative of David and the diary of Esther, like that between Micawber and Skimpole, marks the superiority of the first to its successor. To represent a storyteller as giving the most surprising vividness to manners, motives, and characters of which we are to believe her, all the time, as artlessly unconscious, as she is also entirely ignorant of the good qualities in herself she is naïvely revealing in the story, was a difficult enterprise, full of hazard in any case, not[42] worth success, and certainly not successful. Ingenuity is more apparent than freshness, the invention is neither easy nor unstrained, and though the old marvellous power over the real is again abundantly manifest, there is some alloy of the artificial. Nor can this be said of Esther's relation without some general application to the book of which it forms so large a part. The novel is nevertheless, in the very important particular of construction, perhaps the best thing done by Dickens.
Bleak House came after Copperfield, and in some ways, it borrowed the autobiographical style using excerpts from the personal story of its heroine. However, the difference between David's narrative and Esther's diary, much like between Micawber and Skimpole, highlights the superiority of the former over the latter. Portraying a storyteller as if she’s effortlessly revealing the most surprising details about the behavior, motives, and characters we’re meant to believe in, all while being completely unaware of her own good traits that she naively discloses in the tale, was a challenging task. It was risky and certainly not executed well. Creativity is more noticeable than originality, the storytelling is neither effortless nor natural, and while the old magical ability to capture reality is present, there is some element of artifice. This can also be said about Esther's narrative in relation to the book it significantly contributes to. Nonetheless, the novel distinguishes itself, particularly in terms of structure, as perhaps the best work by Dickens.
In his later writings he had been assiduously cultivating this essential of his art, and here he brought it very nearly to perfection. Of the tendency of composing a story piecemeal to induce greater concern for the part than for the whole, he had been always conscious; but I remember a remark also made by him to the effect that to read a story in parts had no less a tendency to prevent the reader's noticing how thoroughly a work so presented might be calculated for perusal as a whole. Look back from the last to the first page of the present novel, and not even in the highest examples of this kind of elaborate care will it be found, that event leads more closely to event, or that the separate incidents have been planned with a more studied consideration of the bearing they are severally to have on the general result. Nothing is introduced at random, everything tends to the catastrophe, the various lines of the plot converge and fit to its centre, and to the larger interest all the rest is irresistibly drawn. The heart of the story is a Chancery suit. On this the plot hinges, and on incidents connected with it, trivial or important, the passion and suffering turn exclusively. Chance words, or the deeds of chance people, to appearance[43] irrelevant, are found everywhere influencing the course taken by a train of incidents of which the issue is life or death, happiness or misery, to men and women perfectly unknown to them, and to whom they are unknown. Attorneys of all possible grades, law clerks of every conceivable kind, the copyist, the law stationer, the usurer, all sorts of money lenders, suitors of every description, haunters of the Chancery court and their victims, are for ever moving round about the lives of the chief persons in the tale, and drawing them on insensibly, but very certainly, to the issues that await them. Even the fits of the little law-stationer's servant help directly in the chain of small things that lead indirectly to Lady Dedlock's death. One strong chain of interest holds together Chesney Wold and its inmates, Bleak House and the Jarndyce group, Chancery with its sorry and sordid neighbourhood. The characters multiply as the tale advances, but in each the drift is the same. "There's no great odds betwixt my noble and learned brother and myself," says the grotesque proprietor of the rag and bottle shop under the wall of Lincoln's-inn, "they call me Lord Chancellor and my shop Chancery, and we both of us grub on in a muddle." Edax rerum the motto of both, but with a difference. Out of the lumber of the shop emerge slowly some fragments of evidence by which the chief actors in the story are sensibly affected, and to which Chancery itself might have succumbed if its devouring capacities had been less complete. But by the time there is found among the lumber the will which puts all to rights in the Jarndyce suit, it is found to be too late to put anything to rights. The costs have[44] swallowed up the estate, and there is an end of the matter.
In his later writings, he diligently focused on this essential aspect of his art, and here he nearly perfected it. He was always aware of how composing a story piece by piece could lead to more concern for individual parts than for the whole. However, I also remember him mentioning that reading a story in parts could prevent the reader from realizing how completely such a work was designed to be read as a whole. If you look back from the last page to the first page of this novel, even in the best examples of this careful approach, you won’t find events connecting more closely or that the separate incidents were planned with greater thought about how they impact the overall outcome. Nothing is added randomly; everything leads to the climax, the various plot lines converge at its center, and everything else is irresistibly drawn into the larger narrative. The core of the story is a Chancery lawsuit. The plot hinges on this, and all the passion and suffering revolve around incidents related to it, whether trivial or significant. Random words or actions by seemingly unrelated people influence the trajectory of a series of events that could mean life or death, happiness or misery, for individuals they do not know, and who do not know them. Attorneys of all kinds, law clerks in various roles, copyists, law stationers, usurers, all sorts of moneylenders, suitors of every type, visitors to the Chancery court, and their victims constantly impact the lives of the main characters, subtly yet surely guiding them towards their fates. Even the mishaps of the little law-stationer's servant directly contribute to the chain of small events that lead indirectly to Lady Dedlock's death. A strong chain of interest ties together Chesney Wold and its inhabitants, Bleak House and the Jarndyce group, along with Chancery and its grim surroundings. The characters increase as the story progresses, but the direction remains the same. "There’s not much difference between my noble and learned brother and me," remarks the quirky owner of the rag and bottle shop near Lincoln's Inn, "they call me Lord Chancellor and my shop Chancery, and we both just muddle through." Edax rerum is the motto for both, but with a twist. From the clutter of the shop, some fragments of evidence emerge slowly, impacting the primary actors in the story, and to which Chancery itself might have yielded if it hadn’t been so completely all-consuming. However, by the time the will appears among the clutter that could settle the Jarndyce case, it’s discovered to be too late for anything to be resolved. The legal fees have consumed the estate, and that’s where the story ends.
What in one sense is a merit however may in others be a defect, and this book has suffered by the very completeness with which its Chancery moral is worked out. The didactic in Dickens's earlier novels derived its strength from being merely incidental to interest of a higher and more permanent kind, and not in a small degree from the playful sportiveness and fancy that lighted up its graver illustrations. Here it is of sterner stuff, too little relieved, and all-pervading. The fog so marvellously painted in the opening chapter has hardly cleared away when there arises, in Jarndyce v. Jarndyce, as bad an atmosphere to breathe in; and thenceforward to the end, clinging round the people of the story as they come or go, in dreary mist or in heavy cloud, it is rarely absent. Dickens has himself described his purpose to have been to dwell on the romantic side of familiar things. But it is the romance of discontent and misery, with a very restless dissatisfied moral, and is too much brought about by agencies disagreeable and sordid. The Guppys, Weevles, Snagsbys, Chadbands, Krooks, and Smallweeds, even the Kenges, Vholeses, and Tulkinghorns, are much too real to be pleasant; and the necessity becomes urgent for the reliefs and contrasts of a finer humanity. These last are not wanting; yet it must be said that we hardly escape, even with them, into the old freedom and freshness of the author's imaginative worlds, and that the too conscious unconsciousness of Esther flings something of a shade on the radiant goodness of John Jarndyce himself. Nevertheless there are very fine delineations in the story.[45] The crazed little Chancery lunatic, Miss Flite; the loud-voiced tender-souled Chancery victim, Gridley; the poor good-hearted youth Richard, broken up in life and character by the suspense of the Chancery suit on whose success he is to "begin the world," believing himself to be saving money when he is stopped from squandering it, and thinking that having saved it he is entitled to fling it away; trooper George, with the Bagnets and their household, where the most ludicrous points are more forcible for the pathetic touches underlying them; the Jellyby interior, and its philanthropic strong-minded mistress, placid and smiling amid a household muddle outmuddling Chancery itself; the model of deportment, Turveydrop the elder, whose relations to the young people, whom he so superbly patronizes by being dependent on them for everything, touch delightfully some subtle points of truth; the inscrutable Tulkinghorn, and the immortal Bucket; all these, and especially the last, have been added by this book to the list of people more intimately and permanently known to us than the scores of actual familiar acquaintance whom we see around us living and dying.
What may be seen as a strength in one way can, in other ways, be a weakness, and this book has suffered from the very thoroughness with which its moral lessons are explored. In Dickens's earlier novels, the teaching moments gained their power from being incidental to a more engaging and lasting storyline, greatly aided by the playful spirit and imagination that brightened its more serious messages. Here, it’s made of tougher stuff, too little relieved and everywhere present. The fog beautifully described in the opening chapter hardly lifts before another heavy atmosphere descends in Jarndyce v. Jarndyce, which is just as suffocating; from then on until the end, it clings to the characters as they move about, whether in dreary haze or thick clouds, and is seldom absent. Dickens himself expressed that his aim was to highlight the romantic side of everyday things. Yet, it’s a romance filled with discontent and misery, driven by a restless, unhappy moral, and largely portrayed through unpleasant and gritty elements. Characters like the Guppys, Weevles, Snagsbys, Chadbands, Krooks, and Smallweeds, even the Kenges, Vholeses, and Tulkinghorns, feel far too real to be enjoyable, making the need for the relief and contrasts of a more refined humanity increasingly urgent. While these latter characters do exist, it must be noted that we barely escape, even with them, into the old freedom and freshness of the author’s imaginative realms, and Esther’s overly aware innocence casts a bit of a shadow over John Jarndyce's own admirable goodness. Still, there are many beautifully drawn characters in the story. The wild little Chancery madwoman, Miss Flite; the loud but tender-hearted Chancery victim, Gridley; the kind-hearted young man Richard, whose life and character are shattered by the uncertainty of the Chancery case that he believes will allow him to “start over,” thinking he is saving money when he is really being stopped from squandering it, and believing he has saved enough to waste; trooper George, along with the Bagnets and their family, where the most comical moments are made more powerful by the underlying pathos; the Jellyby household, with its strong-minded philanthropic mistress, serene and smiling amid a chaos surpassing even Chancery itself; the impeccable Turveydrop the elder, whose relationships with the young people he magnificently patronizes by being entirely dependent on them reveal some wonderfully subtle truths; the mysterious Tulkinghorn and the unforgettable Bucket; all of these characters, especially the last, have become more intimately and permanently known to us than many of the familiar acquaintances we see around us in life and death.
But how do we know them? There are plenty to tell us that it is by vividness of external observation rather than by depth of imaginative insight, by tricks of manner and phrase rather than by truth of character, by manifestation outwardly rather than by what lies behind. Another opportunity will present itself for some remark on this kind of criticism, which has always had a special pride in the subtlety of its differences from what the world may have shown itself prone to admire. "In my father's library," wrote Landor to Southey's[46] daughter Edith, "was the Critical Review from its commencement; and it would have taught me, if I could not even at a very early age teach myself better, that Fielding, Sterne, and Goldsmith were really worth nothing." It is a style that will never be without cultivators, and its frequent application to Dickens will be shown hereafter. But in speaking of a book in which some want of all the freshness of his genius first became apparent, it would be wrong to omit to add that his method of handling a character is as strongly impressed on the better portions of it as on the best of his writings. It is difficult to say when a peculiarity becomes too grotesque, or an extravagance too farcical, to be within the limits of art, for it is the truth of these as of graver things that they exist in the world in just the proportions and degree in which genius can discover them. But no man had ever so surprising a faculty as Dickens of becoming himself what he was representing; and of entering into mental phases and processes so absolutely, in conditions of life the most varied, as to reproduce them completely in dialogue without need of an explanatory word. (He only departed from this method once, with a result which will then be pointed out.) In speaking on a former page of the impression of reality thus to a singular degree conveyed by him, it was remarked that where characters so revealed themselves the author's part in them was done; and in the book under notice there is none, not excepting those least attractive which apparently present only prominent or salient qualities, in which it will not be found that the characteristic feature embodied, or the main idea personified, contains as certainly also some human[47] truth universally applicable. To expound or discuss his creations, to lay them psychologically bare, to analyse their organisms, to subject to minute demonstration their fibrous and other tissues, was not at all Dickens's way. His genius was his fellow feeling with his race; his mere personality was never the bound or limit to his perceptions, however strongly sometimes it might colour them; he never stopped to dissect or anatomize his own work; but no man could better adjust the outward and visible oddities in a delineation to its inner and unchangeable veracities. The rough estimates we form of character, if we have any truth of perception, are on the whole correct: but men touch and interfere with one another by the contact of their extremes, and it may very often become necessarily the main business of a novelist to display the salient points, the sharp angles, or the prominences merely.
But how do we really know them? Many would argue it’s more about vivid external observation than deep imaginative insight, more about mannerisms and phrases than true character, more about outward appearances than what lies beneath. There will be another chance to comment on this type of criticism, which takes pride in its distinct differences from what society tends to admire. "In my father's library," Landor wrote to Southey's daughter Edith, "was the Critical Review from the very beginning; and it would have taught me, if I hadn’t taught myself better at a young age, that Fielding, Sterne, and Goldsmith were really worthless." This style will always have its supporters, and its frequent critiques of Dickens will be discussed later. But when talking about a book where some lack of the freshness of his genius first became noticeable, it's important to add that his way of handling a character is just as strongly impressed on the better parts of it as on his best works. It’s hard to determine when a peculiarity becomes too absurd or an exaggeration becomes too ridiculous to fit within the limits of art, because the truth of these things, as with more serious matters, exists in the world in the exact proportions that genius can reveal them. However, no one had such a surprising ability as Dickens to become what he was portraying; he could dive into mental phases and processes so completely, in the most varied life situations, that he could reproduce them perfectly in dialogue without needing to explain. (He only deviated from this method once, with a result that will be pointed out later.) When discussing the remarkable impression of reality he conveyed, it was noted that where characters revealed themselves so distinctly, the author’s involvement was done; and in the book in question, there are none, even those that seem the least appealing and only showcase prominent qualities, where it won’t be found that the dominant feature embodied or the main idea personified also contains some universally applicable human truth. To explain or analyze his creations, to lay them bare psychologically, to dissect their structures, and to examine their intricate details, was not at all Dickens's way. His genius stemmed from his empathy with humanity; his personal biases never limited his perception, even if they sometimes colored it strongly; he never stopped to dissect or analyze his own work; yet no one could better match the outer oddities in a representation with its inner and unchanging truths. The rough assessments we make of character, if we have any real perception, are generally correct: but people interact and influence one another through their extremes, and it often becomes a novelist's main task to highlight the striking features, sharp angles, or just the standout traits.
The pathetic parts of Bleak House do not live largely in remembrance, but the deaths of Richard and of Gridley, the wandering fancies of Miss Flite, and the extremely touching way in which the gentleman-nature of the pompous old baronet, Dedlock, asserts itself under suffering, belong to a high order of writing. There is another most affecting example, taking the lead of the rest, in the poor street-sweeper Jo; which has made perhaps as deep an impression as anything in Dickens. "We have been reading Bleak House aloud," the good Dean Ramsay wrote to me very shortly before his death. "Surely it is one of his most powerful and successful! What a triumph is Jo! Uncultured nature is there indeed; the intimations of true heart-feeling, the glimmerings of higher feeling, all are[48] there; but everything still consistent and in harmony. Wonderful is the genius that can show all this, yet keep it only and really part of the character itself, low or common as it may be, and use no morbid or fictitious colouring. To my mind, nothing in the field of fiction is to be found in English literature surpassing the death of Jo!" What occurs at and after the inquest is as worth remembering. Jo's evidence is rejected because he cannot exactly say what will be done to him after he is dead if he should tell a lie;[167] but he manages to say afterwards very exactly what the deceased while he lived did to him. That one cold winter night, when he was shivering in a doorway near his crossing, a man turned to look at him, and came back, and, having questioned him and found he had not a friend in the world, said, "Neither have I. Not one!" and gave him the price of a supper and a night's lodging. That the man had often spoken to him since, and asked him[49] if he slept of a night, and how he bore cold and hunger, or if he ever wished to die; and would say in passing "I am as poor as you to-day, Jo" when he had no money, but when he had any would always give some. "He wos wery good to me," says the boy, wiping his eyes with his wretched sleeve. "Wen I see him a-layin' so stritched out just now, I wished he could have heerd me tell him so. He wos werry good to me, he wos!" The inquest over, the body is flung into a pestiferous churchyard in the next street, houses overlooking it on every side, and a reeking little tunnel of a court giving access to its iron gate. "With the night, comes a slouching figure through the tunnel-court, to the outside of the iron gate. It holds the gate with its hands, and looks in within the bars; stands looking in, for a little while. It then, with an old broom it carries, softly sweeps the step, and makes the archway clean. It does so, very busily, and trimly; looks in again, a little while; and so departs." These are among the things in Dickens that cannot be forgotten; and if Bleak House had many more faults than have been found in it, such salt and savour as this might freshen it for some generations.
The sad parts of Bleak House might not stick in our minds as much, but the deaths of Richard and Gridley, the wandering thoughts of Miss Flite, and the deeply moving way in which the gentlemanly nature of the pompous old baronet, Dedlock, reveals itself in suffering, reflect a high level of writing. Another incredibly touching example, leading the rest, is the poor street-sweeper Jo; it likely leaves as deep an impression as anything in Dickens. "We've been reading Bleak House aloud," the good Dean Ramsay wrote to me shortly before his death. "Surely, it's one of his most powerful and successful works! What a triumph Jo is! Uncultivated nature is truly present there; the hints of genuine heart-feeling and the glimmers of higher emotion are all evident, yet everything remains consistent and harmonious. It’s amazing how the genius can portray all this while keeping it genuinely part of the character itself, no matter how low or ordinary, without using any morbid or fake embellishments. To me, nothing in English fiction surpasses the death of Jo!" What happens at and after the inquest is also worth remembering. Jo’s testimony is dismissed because he can’t clearly explain what will happen to him after he dies if he lies; but he accurately recounts what the deceased did for him while he was alive. One cold winter night, while he was shivering in a doorway near his crossing, a man turned to look at him, came back, and after asking questions and learning he had no friends, said, "Neither do I. Not one!" and gave him enough for supper and a night's lodging. This man often checked in on him afterwards, asking if he was sleeping at night, how he managed with the cold and hunger, or if he ever wished to die; he would pass by saying, "I'm as poor as you today, Jo," when he had no money, but when he did, he always shared some. "He was very good to me," the boy says, wiping his eyes with his ragged sleeve. "When I saw him lying there just now, I wished he could have heard me tell him that. He was very good to me!" After the inquest, the body is discarded in a filthy graveyard in the next street, with houses surrounding it on all sides, and a dirty little alley providing access to its iron gate. "As night falls, a slouching figure comes through the alley to the iron gate. It holds the gate with its hands and looks through the bars; it stands looking in for a little while. Then, with an old broom it carries, it gently sweeps the step and tidies the archway. It does this very industriously and neatly; looks in again for a moment; and then leaves." These moments in Dickens are unforgettable; even if Bleak House had many more flaws than have been pointed out, this kind of vivid storytelling would keep it alive for generations.
The first intention was to have made Jo more prominent in the story, and its earliest title was taken from the tumbling tenements in Chancery, "Tom-all-Alone's," where he finds his wretched habitation; but this was abandoned. On the other hand, Dickens was encouraged and strengthened in his design of assailing Chancery abuses and delays by receiving, a few days after the appearance of his first number, a striking pamphlet on the subject containing details so apposite[50] that he took from them, without change in any material point, the memorable case related in his fifteenth chapter. Any one who examines the tract[168] will see how exactly true is the reference to it made by Dickens in his preface. "The case of Gridley is in no essential altered from one of actual occurrence, made public by a disinterested person who was professionally acquainted with the whole of the monstrous wrong from beginning to end." The suit, of which all particulars are given, affected a single farm, in value not more than £1200, but all that its owner possessed in the world, against which a bill had been filed for a £300 legacy left in the will bequeathing the farm. In reality there was only one defendant, but in the bill, by the rule of the Court, there were seventeen; and, after two years had been occupied over the seventeen answers, everything had to begin over again because an eighteenth had been accidentally omitted. "What a mockery of justice this is," says Mr. Challinor, "the facts speak for themselves, and I can personally vouch for their accuracy. The costs already incurred in reference to this £300 legacy are not less than from £800 to £900, and the parties are no forwarder. Already near five years have passed by, and the plaintiff would be glad to give up his chance of the legacy if he could escape from his liability to costs, while the defendants who own the little farm left by the testator, have scarce any other prospect before them than ruin."
The initial goal was to make Jo a more significant character in the story, and the original title was inspired by the rundown apartments in Chancery, "Tom-all-Alone's," where he discovers his miserable home; however, this idea was dropped. On the flip side, Dickens was motivated and bolstered in his plan to criticize Chancery’s abuses and delays after receiving, just days after the release of his first installment, a compelling pamphlet on the topic that included details so relevant[50] that he directly incorporated the notable case discussed in his fifteenth chapter. Anyone who looks at the tract[168] will see how accurately Dickens references it in his preface. "The case of Gridley is in no way different from an actual event, made public by an impartial person who was professionally familiar with the entire egregious wrong from start to finish." The lawsuit, which includes all details, involved a single farm valued at no more than £1200, but it was everything its owner had, against which a bill had been filed for a £300 legacy left in the will for the farm. In reality, there was only one defendant, but according to court rules, there were seventeen mentioned in the bill; and after spending two years on the seventeen responses, everything had to restart because an eighteenth had been accidentally left out. "What a mockery of justice this is," says Mr. Challinor, "the facts speak for themselves, and I can personally vouch for their accuracy. The costs already incurred related to this £300 legacy amount to between £800 and £900, and the parties are no further along. Nearly five years have already passed, and the plaintiff would be happy to give up his chance at the legacy if he could escape his responsibility for costs, while the defendants who own the small farm left by the testator hardly have any other future before them than disaster."
CHAPTER II.
HOME INCIDENTS AND HARD TIMES.
1853-1854-1855.
David Copperfield had been written, in Devonshire-terrace for the most part, between the opening of 1849 and October 1850, its publication covering that time; and its sale, which has since taken the lead of all his books but Pickwick, never then exceeding twenty-five thousand. But though it remained thus steady for the time, the popularity of the book added largely to the sale of its successor. Bleak House was begun in his new abode of Tavistock House at the end of November 1851; was carried on, amid the excitements of the Guild performances, through the following year; was finished at Boulogne in the August of 1853; and was dedicated to "his friends and companions in the Guild of Literature and Art."[52]
David Copperfield was mostly written in Devonshire-terrace between early 1849 and October 1850, with its publication spanning that period; its sales, which have since outpaced all his books except for Pickwick, never exceeded twenty-five thousand at that time. However, even though it stayed steady in sales back then, the book's popularity significantly boosted the sales of its follow-up. Bleak House was started in his new home at Tavistock House at the end of November 1851, continued amid the excitement of the Guild performances throughout the following year, completed in Boulogne in August 1853, and dedicated to "his friends and companions in the Guild of Literature and Art."[52]

In March 1852 the first number appeared,[169] and its sale was mentioned in the same letter from Tavistock House (7th of March) which told of his troubles in the story at its outset, and of other anxieties incident to the common lot and inseparable equally from its joys and sorrows, through which his life was passing at the time. "My Highgate journey yesterday was a sad one. Sad to think how all journeys tend that way. I went up to the cemetery to look for a piece of ground. In no hope of a Government bill,[170] and in a foolish dislike to leaving the little child shut up in a vault there, I think of pitching a tent under the sky. . . . Nothing has taken place here: but I believe, every hour, that it must next hour. Wild ideas are upon me of going to Paris—Rouen—Switzerland—somewhere—and writing the remaining two-thirds of the next No. aloft in some queer inn room. I have been hanging over it, and have got restless. Want a change I think.[53] Stupid. We were at 30,000 when I last heard. . . . I am sorry to say that after all kinds of evasions, I am obliged to dine at Lansdowne House to-morrow. But maybe the affair will come off to-night and give me an excuse! I enclose proofs of No. 2. Browne has done[54] Skimpole, and helped to make him singularly unlike the great original. Look it over, and say what occurs to you. . . . Don't you think Mrs. Gaskell charming? With one ill-considered thing that looks like a want of natural perception, I think it masterly." His last allusion is to the story by a delightful writer then appearing in Household Words; and of the others it only needs to say that the family affair which might have excused his absence at the Lansdowne dinner did not come off until four days later. On the 13th of March his last child was born; and the boy, his seventh son, bears his godfather's distinguished name, Edward Bulwer Lytton.
In March 1852, the first issue was released,[169] and its sale was mentioned in the same letter from Tavistock House (March 7th) that described his troubles at the beginning of the story, along with other worries that are part of life, inseparable from its joys and sorrows, which he was experiencing at the time. "My trip to Highgate yesterday was a sad one. It’s sad to think that all journeys tend to end up that way. I went to the cemetery to look for a piece of land. With no hope of a Government bill,[170] and a foolish reluctance to leave the little child sealed up in a vault there, I’m thinking about pitching a tent under the open sky. . . . Nothing has happened here, but I believe, every hour, that something must happen in the next hour. I have these wild thoughts about going to Paris—Rouen—Switzerland—somewhere—and writing the remaining two-thirds of the next issue in some quirky inn room. I’ve been obsessing over it, and I’m feeling restless. I think I need a change. [53] It’s silly. We were at 30,000 the last time I checked. . . . I’m sorry to say that after all sorts of excuses, I have to dine at Lansdowne House tomorrow. But maybe the event will happen tonight and give me an excuse! I’m enclosing proofs of No. 2. Browne has illustrated Skimpole, making him strikingly unlike the great original. Take a look at it and let me know your thoughts. . . . Don’t you think Mrs. Gaskell is charming? With one poorly thought-out detail that seems to show a lack of natural perception, I still think it’s masterful." His final reference is to the story by a delightful writer who was then being published in Household Words; and it only remains to mention that the family matter which might have justified his absence from the Lansdowne dinner didn’t happen until four days later. On March 13th, his last child was born; the boy, his seventh son, carries his godfather's notable name, Edward Bulwer Lytton.
The inability to "grind sparks out of his dull blade," as he characterized his present labour at Bleak House, still fretting him, he struck out a scheme for Paris. "I could not get to Switzerland very well at this time of year. The Jura would be covered with snow. And if I went to Geneva I don't know where I might not go to." It ended at last in a flight to Dover; but he found time before he left, amid many occupations and some anxieties, for a good-natured journey to Walworth to see a youth rehearse who was supposed to have talents for the stage, and he was able to gladden Mr. Toole's friends by thinking favourably of his chances of success. "I remember what I once myself wanted in that way," he said, "and I should like to serve him."
The frustration of not being able to "get anything out of his dull blade," as he described his current work at Bleak House, still bothering him, he came up with a plan for Paris. "I can't really go to Switzerland this time of year. The Jura will be covered in snow. And if I went to Geneva, I wouldn't know where else I might end up." It eventually led to a trip to Dover; but before he left, amidst many tasks and some worries, he found time for a friendly visit to Walworth to see a young man rehearse who supposedly had talent for the stage, and he was happy to give Mr. Toole's friends hope by being optimistic about the young man's chances of success. "I remember what I once wanted in that way," he said, "and I’d like to help him."
At one of the last dinners in Tavistock House before his departure, Mr. Watson of Rockingham was present; and he was hardly settled in Camden-crescent, Dover, when he had news of the death of that excellent friend.[55] "Poor dear Watson! It was this day two weeks when you rode with us and he dined with us. We all remarked after he had gone how happy he seemed to have got over his election troubles, and how cheerful he was. He was full of Christmas plans for Rockingham, and was very anxious that we should get up a little French piece I had been telling him the plot of. He went abroad next day to join Mrs. Watson and the children at Homburg, and then go to Lausanne, where they had taken a house for a month. He was seized at Homburg with violent internal inflammation, and died—without much pain—in four days. . . . I was so fond of him that I am sorry you didn't know him better. I believe he was as thoroughly good and true a man as ever lived; and I am sure I can have felt no greater affection for him than he felt for me. When I think of that bright house, and his fine simple honest heart, both so open to me, the blank and loss are like a dream." Other deaths followed. "Poor d'Orsay!" he wrote after only seven days (8th of August). "It is a tremendous consideration that friends should fall around us in such awful numbers as we attain middle life. What a field of battle it is!" Nor had another month quite passed before he lost, in Mrs. Macready, a very dear family friend. "Ah me! ah me!" he wrote. "This tremendous sickle certainly does cut deep into the surrounding corn, when one's own small blade has ripened. But this is all a Dream, may be, and death will wake us."
At one of the last dinners at Tavistock House before he left, Mr. Watson of Rockingham was there; and he had barely settled in Camden Crescent, Dover, when he got news of the death of that great friend. “Poor dear Watson! It was exactly two weeks ago today when you rode with us and he had dinner with us. We all noticed after he left how happy he seemed to have gotten over his election troubles and how cheerful he was. He was full of Christmas plans for Rockingham and was really eager for us to put on a little French play I had been telling him about. He went abroad the next day to join Mrs. Watson and the kids at Homburg, and then they were going to Lausanne, where they had rented a house for a month. He was struck with severe internal inflammation at Homburg and died—without much pain—in four days... I cared for him so much that I regret you didn't know him better. I believe he was as genuinely good and true a man as ever lived; and I’m certain I felt as much affection for him as he felt for me. When I think of that bright house and his fine, simple, honest heart, both so open to me, the emptiness and loss feel like a dream.” More deaths followed. “Poor d'Orsay!” he wrote just seven days later (August 8th). “It’s a heavy thought that friends fall around us in such terrible numbers as we reach middle age. What a battleground it is!” And not quite a month later, he lost a very dear family friend, Mrs. Macready. “Oh dear! Oh dear!” he wrote. “This immense scythe certainly cuts deeply into the surrounding grain when one’s own small blade has ripened. But this may all be a dream, and death will wake us.”
Able at last to settle to his work, he stayed in Dover three months; and early in October, sending home his family caravan, crossed to Boulogne to try it as a resort[56] for seaside holiday. "I never saw a better instance of our countrymen than this place. Because it is accessible it is genteel to say it is of no character, quite English, nothing continental about it, and so forth. It is as quaint, picturesque, good a place as I know; the boatmen and fishing-people quite a race apart, and some of their villages as good as the fishing-villages on the Mediterranean. The Haute Ville, with a walk all round it on the ramparts, charming. The country walks, delightful. It is the best mixture of town and country (with sea air into the bargain) I ever saw; everything cheap, everything good; and please God I shall be writing on those said ramparts next July!"
Finally able to get to work, he stayed in Dover for three months. In early October, after sending his family caravan back home, he took a trip to Boulogne to see if it was a good spot for a seaside getaway. "I've never seen a better example of my fellow countrymen than at this place. Since it's easy to reach, people say it lacks character—completely English, nothing European about it, and so on. It’s as charming and picturesque a place as I know; the fishermen and boatmen feel like a unique group, with some of their villages just as good as the fishing villages on the Mediterranean. The Haute Ville, with its lovely walking paths on the ramparts, is delightful. The country walks are wonderful. It's the best blend of town and country (with added sea breeze) I've ever seen; everything is inexpensive, everything is great; and please God, I'll be writing on those very ramparts next July!"
Before the year closed, the time to which his publishing arrangements with Messrs. Bradbury and Evans were limited had expired, but at his suggestion the fourth share in such books as he might write, which they had now received for eight years, was continued to them on the understanding that the publishers' percentage should no longer be charged in the partnership accounts, and with a power reserved to himself to withdraw when he pleased. In the new year his first adventure was an ovation in Birmingham, where a silver-gilt salver and a diamond ring were presented to him, as well for eloquent service specially rendered to the Institution, as in general testimony of "varied literary acquirements, genial philosophy, and high moral teaching." A great banquet followed on Twelfth Night, made memorable by an offer[171] to give a couple[57] of readings from his books at the following Christmas, in aid of the new Midland Institute. It might seem to have been drawn from him as a grateful return for the enthusiastic greeting of his entertainers, but it was in his mind before he left London. It was his first formal undertaking to read in public.
Before the year ended, the time for his publishing deal with Messrs. Bradbury and Evans had run out, but at his suggestion, they continued to receive a fourth share of any books he might write, which they had held for eight years, on the condition that the publishers' percentage wouldn't be taken from the partnership accounts anymore, and he reserved the right to back out whenever he wanted. In the new year, his first event was a celebration in Birmingham, where he was presented with a silver-gilt tray and a diamond ring, in recognition of his outstanding service to the Institution and as a general acknowledgment of his "varied literary skills, friendly philosophy, and strong moral teachings." A grand banquet followed on Twelfth Night, made unforgettable by an offer[171] to give a couple[57] of readings from his books the following Christmas to support the new Midland Institute. While it may have seemed like a spontaneous gesture in gratitude for the warm welcome from his hosts, he had actually planned it before leaving London. This was his first formal commitment to perform a reading in public.
His eldest son had now left Eton, and, the boy's wishes pointing at the time to a mercantile career, he was sent to Leipzig for completion of his education.[172] At this date it seemed to me that the overstrain of attempting too much, brought upon him by the necessities of his weekly periodical, became first apparent in Dickens. Not unfrequently a complaint strange upon his lips fell from him. "Hypochondriacal whisperings tell me that I am rather overworked. The spring does not seem to fly back again directly, as it always did when I put my own work aside, and had nothing else to do. Yet I have everything to keep me going with a brave heart, Heaven knows!" Courage and hopefulness he might well derive from the increasing sale of[58] Bleak House, which had risen to nearly forty thousand; but he could no longer bear easily what he carried so lightly of old, and enjoyments with work were too much for him. "What with Bleak House, and Household Words, and Child's History" (he dictated from week to week the papers which formed that little book, and cannot be said to have quite hit the mark with it), "and Miss Coutts's Home, and the invitations to feasts and festivals, I really feel as if my head would split like a fired shell if I remained here." He tried Brighton first, but did not find it answer, and returned.[173] A few days of unalloyed enjoyment were afterwards given to the visit of his excellent American friend Felton; and on the 13th of June he was again in Boulogne, thanking heaven for escape from a breakdown. "If I had substituted anybody's knowledge of myself for my own, and lingered in London, I never could have got through."
His eldest son had now left Eton, and since the boy wanted to pursue a business career at the time, he was sent to Leipzig to finish his education.[172] At that moment, it seemed to me that the strain of trying to do too much, caused by the demands of his weekly publication, started to show in Dickens. Often, a strange complaint slipped from his lips. "Hypochondriacal whisperings tell me that I am rather overworked. The spring doesn’t seem to bounce back as quickly as it used to when I set my own work aside and had nothing else to do. Yet I have everything to keep me going with a brave heart, Heaven knows!" He could certainly draw courage and hope from the rising sales of[58] Bleak House, which had climbed to nearly forty thousand; but he could no longer handle what he once took in stride, and balancing enjoyment with work was becoming too much for him. "Between Bleak House, Household Words, and Child's History" (he dictated the papers that made up that little book week by week, and it can’t be said he quite hit the mark with it), "and Miss Coutts's Home, along with invites to parties and events, I really feel like my head would explode if I stayed here." He first tried Brighton, but it didn’t work out, so he came back.[173] A few days of pure enjoyment followed his visit with his great American friend Felton; and on June 13th, he was back in Boulogne, thanking heaven for escaping a breakdown. "If I had swapped anyone's understanding of me for my own and stayed in London, I never would have made it through."
What befell him in Boulogne will be given, with the incidents of his second and third summer visits to the place, on a later page. He completed, by the third week of August, his novel of Bleak House; and it was resolved to celebrate the event by a two months' trip to Italy, in company with Mr. Wilkie Collins and Mr. Augustus Egg. The start was to be made from Boulogne in the middle of October, when he would send his family home; and he described the intervening weeks as a fearful "reaction and prostration of laziness" only broken by the Child's History. At the end of September he wrote: "I finished the little History yesterday, and am trying to think of something for the Christmas number. After which I shall knock off; having had quite enough to do, small as it would have seemed to me at any other time, since I finished Bleak House." He added, a week before his departure: "I get letters from Genoa and Lausanne as if I were going to stay in each place at least a month. If I were to measure my deserts by people's remembrance of me, I should be a prodigy of intolerability. Have recovered my Italian, which I had all but forgotten, and am one entire and perfect chrysolite of idleness."
What happened to him in Boulogne, along with the events of his second and third summer visits there, will be discussed on a later page. By the third week of August, he finished his novel, Bleak House; and it was decided to celebrate this accomplishment with a two-month trip to Italy, accompanied by Mr. Wilkie Collins and Mr. Augustus Egg. They planned to leave from Boulogne in mid-October, when he would send his family back home; he referred to the weeks leading up to it as a terrible "reaction and prostration of laziness," only interrupted by the Child's History. At the end of September, he wrote: "I finished the little History yesterday, and I'm trying to come up with something for the Christmas number. After that, I’ll take a break; I’ve had quite enough to do, short as it may seem to me at any other time, since I wrapped up Bleak House." He added, a week before he left: "I’m getting letters from Genoa and Lausanne as if I’m planning to stay in each place for at least a month. If I were to measure my worth by people’s memories of me, I’d be an unbearable sight. I've recovered my Italian, which I had nearly forgotten, and I am a complete and total example of idleness."
From this trip, of which the incidents have an interest independent of my ordinary narrative, Dickens was home again in the middle of December 1853, and kept his promise to his Birmingham friends by reading in their Town Hall his Christmas Carol on the 27th,[174] and his Cricket on the Hearth on the 29th. The enthusiasm[60] was great, and he consented to read his Carol a second time, on Friday the 30th, if seats were reserved for working men at prices within their means. The result was an addition of between four and five hundred pounds to the funds for establishment of the new Institute; and a prettily worked flower-basket in silver, presented to Mrs. Dickens, commemorated these first public readings "to nearly six thousand people," and the design they had generously helped. Other applications then followed to such extent that limits to compliance had to be put; and a letter of the 16th of May 1854 is one of many that express both the difficulty in which he found himself, and his much desired expedient for solving it. "The objection you suggest to paid public lecturing does not strike me at all. It is worth consideration, but I do not think there is anything in it. On the contrary, if the lecturing would have any motive power at all (like my poor father this, in the sound!) I believe it would tend the other way. In the Colchester matter I had already received a letter from a Colchester magnate; to whom I had honestly replied that I stood pledged to Christmas readings at Bradford[175] and at Reading, and could in no kind of reason do more in the public way." The promise to the people of Reading was for Talfourd's sake; the other was given after the Birmingham nights, when an institute in Bradford asked similar help, and offered a fee of fifty pounds.[61] At first this was entertained; but was abandoned, with some reluctance, upon the argument that to become publicly a reader must alter without improving his position publicly as a writer, and that it was a change to be justified only when the higher calling should have failed of the old success. Thus yielding for the time, he nevertheless soon found the question rising again with the same importunity; his own position to it being always that of a man assenting against his will that it should rest in abeyance. But nothing farther was resolved on yet. The readings mentioned came off as promised, in aid of public objects;[176] and besides others two years later for the family of a friend, he had given the like liberal help to institutes in Folkestone, Chatham, and again in Birmingham, Peterborough, Sheffield, Coventry, and Edinburgh, before the question[62] settled itself finally in the announcement for paid public readings issued by him in 1858.
From this trip, which had interesting events that stand apart from my usual stories, Dickens was back home by mid-December 1853. He kept his promise to his Birmingham friends by reading his Christmas Carol at their Town Hall on the 27th,[174] and his Cricket on the Hearth on the 29th. The excitement was huge, and he agreed to read his Carol again on Friday the 30th, provided that seats were reserved for working men at affordable prices. This resulted in an additional four to five hundred pounds for the new Institute's funds, and a beautifully crafted silver flower basket was presented to Mrs. Dickens to commemorate these first public readings "to nearly six thousand people" and the project they had generously supported. After this, there were so many requests that limitations had to be set. A letter dated May 16, 1854, is just one of many that show the difficulties he faced and his wish to find a solution. "The objection you suggest to paid public lecturing doesn’t concern me at all. It’s worth considering, but I don’t think there’s anything to it. On the contrary, if lecturing would have any purpose at all (like my poor father thought, in his way!), I believe it would actually do the opposite. In the Colchester matter, I had already received a letter from a Colchester bigwig; I honestly replied that I was committed to Christmas readings in Bradford[175] and Reading, and I couldn't possibly do more publicly." The promise to Reading was for Talfourd's sake; the other was made after the Birmingham events when an institute in Bradford requested similar assistance and offered a fee of fifty pounds.[61] Initially, he considered this but ultimately rejected it somewhat reluctantly, arguing that becoming a public reader would not improve his status as a writer and should only be justified if his previous success had waned. So, for the time being, he gave in, but he soon found the issue coming up again with the same urgency, his stance always being that of a man reluctantly agreeing to leave it unsettled. However, nothing more was decided at that time. The readings mentioned took place as promised, benefiting public causes;[176] and aside from others, two years later for a friend’s family, he generously supported institutes in Folkestone, Chatham, and again in Birmingham, as well as Peterborough, Sheffield, Coventry, and Edinburgh, before the issue finally resolved itself with his announcement for paid public readings in 1858.
Carrying memory back to his home in the first half of 1854, there are few things that rise more pleasantly in connection with it than the children's theatricals. These began with the first Twelfth Night at Tavistock House, and were renewed until the principal actors ceased to be children. The best of the performances were Tom Thumb and Fortunio, in '54 and '55; Dickens now joining first in the revel, and Mr. Mark Lemon bringing into it his own clever children and a very mountain of child-pleasing fun in himself. Dickens had become very intimate with him, and his merry genial ways had given him unbounded popularity with the "young 'uns," who had no such favourite as "Uncle Mark." In Fielding's burlesque he was the giantess Glumdalca, and Dickens was the ghost of Gaffer Thumb; the names by which they respectively appeared being the Infant Phenomenon and the Modern Garrick. But the younger actors carried off the palm. There was a Lord Grizzle, at whose ballad of Miss Villikins, introduced by desire, Thackeray rolled off his seat in a burst of laughter that became absurdly contagious. Yet even this, with hardly less fun from the Noodles, Doodles, and King Arthurs, was not so good as the pretty, fantastic, comic grace of Dollalolla, Huncamunca, and Tom. The girls wore steadily the grave airs irresistible when put on by little children; and an actor not out of his fourth year, who went through the comic songs and the tragic exploits without a wrong note or a victim unslain, represented the small helmeted hero. He was in the bills as Mr. H——, but[63] bore in fact the name of the illustrious author whose conception he embodied; and who certainly would have hugged him for Tom's opening song, delivered in the arms of Huncamunca, if he could have forgiven the later master in his own craft for having composed it afresh to the air of a ditty then wildly popular at the "Coal Hole."[177] The encores were frequent, and for the most part the little fellow responded to them; but the misplaced enthusiasm that took similar form at the heroic intensity with which he stabbed Dollalolla, he rebuked by going gravely on to the close. His Fortunio, the next Twelfth Night, was not so great; yet when, as a prelude to getting the better of the Dragon, he adulterated his drink (Mr. Lemon played the Dragon) with sherry, the sly relish with which he watched the demoralization, by this means, of his formidable adversary into a helpless imbecility, was perfect. Here Dickens played the testy old Baron, and took advantage of the excitement against the Czar raging in 1855 to denounce him (in a song) as no other than own cousin to the very Bear that Fortunio had gone forth to subdue. He depicted him, in his desolation of autocracy, as the Robinson Crusoe of absolute state, who had at his court many a show-day and many a high-day, but hadn't in all his dominions a Friday.[178] The bill, which attributed[64] these interpolations to "the Dramatic Poet of the Establishment," deserves also mention for the fun of the six large-lettered announcements which stood at the head of it, and could not have been bettered by Mr. Crummles himself. "Re-engagement of that irresistible comedian" (the performer of Lord Grizzle) "Mr. Ainger!" "Reappearance of Mr. H. who created so powerful an impression last year!" "Return of Mr. Charles Dickens Junior from his German engagements!" "Engagement of Miss Kate, who declined the munificent offers of the Management last season!" "Mr. Passé, Mr. Mudperiod, Mr. Measly Servile, and Mr. Wilkini Collini!" "First appearance on any stage of Mr. Plornishmaroontigoonter (who has been kept out of bed at a vast expense)." The last performer mentioned[179] was yet at some distance from the third year of his age. Dickens was Mr. Passé.
Carrying memories back to his home in the first half of 1854, there are few things that stand out more positively than the children’s theater performances. These started with the first Twelfth Night at Tavistock House and continued until the main performers were no longer kids. The highlights of the shows were Tom Thumb and Fortunio, in '54 and '55; Dickens participated in the festivities for the first time, and Mr. Mark Lemon brought along his own talented children and a huge amount of child-friendly fun. Dickens had become very close with him, and his cheerful, friendly personality made him incredibly popular with the kids, who had no favorite like "Uncle Mark." In Fielding's parody, he played the giantess Glumdalca, while Dickens was the ghost of Gaffer Thumb; the names they used were the Infant Phenomenon and the Modern Garrick. But the younger actors really stole the show. There was a Lord Grizzle, whose ballad about Miss Villikins made Thackeray double over in laughter, which quickly spread to everyone else. Yet even this, along with the hilarious performances of the Noodles, Doodles, and King Arthurs, didn’t match the charming, whimsical, comedic elegance of Dollalolla, Huncamunca, and Tom. The girls consistently wore those serious expressions that little children put on so compellingly; and an actor not yet four years old, who performed the comic songs and tragic scenes without missing a beat or failing to slay a character, played the small helmeted hero. He was billed as Mr. H—— but was actually named after the famous author he represented; and he surely would have hugged him for Tom’s opening song, delivered in the arms of Huncamunca, if he could have overlooked the fact that the later master of his craft had rewritten it to the tune of a song that was then wildly popular at the "Coal Hole." The encores were frequent, and for the most part, the little guy complied; but he handled the misplaced excitement that arose from the dramatic intensity with which he stabbed Dollalolla by proceeding seriously to the end. His Fortunio, the following Twelfth Night, wasn’t as strong; yet when, preparing to defeat the Dragon (Mr. Lemon played the Dragon), he mixed sherry into his drink, the sly delight with which he observed the Dragon's transformation into a helpless fool was spot on. Here, Dickens took on the role of the grumpy old Baron, seizing the opportunity created by the anti-Czar sentiments in 1855 to denounce him (in a song) as no more than a cousin of the very Bear Fortunio had set out to conquer. He portrayed him, in his rule-bound loneliness, as the Robinson Crusoe of despotism, who had many celebrations at his court but didn’t have a single Friday in all his realm. The program, which attributed these additions to "the Dramatic Poet of the Establishment," deserves mention for the humor of the six large-lettered announcements at the top of it, which could not have been better than Mr. Crummles himself. "Re-engagement of that irresistible comedian" (the performer of Lord Grizzle) "Mr. Ainger!" "Reappearance of Mr. H., who made such a strong impression last year!" "Return of Mr. Charles Dickens Junior from his German engagements!" "Engagement of Miss Kate, who turned down the generous offers of Management last season!" "Mr. Passé, Mr. Mudperiod, Mr. Measly Servile, and Mr. Wilkini Collini!" "First appearance on any stage of Mr. Plornishmaroontigoonter (who has been kept out of bed at a huge expense)." The last performer mentioned was still some way from his third birthday. Dickens was Mr. Passé.
Gravities were mixed with these gaieties. "I wish you would look" (20th of January 1854) "at the enclosed titles for the H. W. story, between this and two o'clock or so, when I will call. It is my usual day, you observe, on which I have jotted them down—Friday! It seems to me that there are three very good ones among them. I should like to know whether you hit upon the same." On the paper enclosed was written: 1. According to Cocker. 2. Prove it. 3. Stubborn Things. 4. Mr. Gradgrind's Facts. 5. The Grindstone. 6. Hard Times. 7. Two and Two are Four. 8. Something Tangible. 9. Our Hard-headed Friend. 10. Rust and Dust. 11. Simple Arithmetic. 12. A Matter of Calculation. 13. A Mere Question of Figures. 14. The Gradgrind Philosophy.[180] The three selected by me were 2, 6, and 11; the three that were his own favourites were 6, 13, and 14; and as 6 had been chosen by both, that title was taken.
Gravities were mixed with these joys. "I wish you would take a look" (January 20, 1854) "at the enclosed titles for the H. W. story, between now and around two o'clock, when I will drop by. It’s my usual day, as you can see, on which I've jotted them down—Friday! I think there are three really good ones among them. I’d like to know if you come up with the same ones." On the enclosed paper, the following was written: 1. According to Cocker. 2. Prove it. 3. Stubborn Things. 4. Mr. Gradgrind's Facts. 5. The Grindstone. 6. Hard Times. 7. Two and Two are Four. 8. Something Tangible. 9. Our Hard-headed Friend. 10. Rust and Dust. 11. Simple Arithmetic. 12. A Matter of Calculation. 13. A Mere Question of Figures. 14. The Gradgrind Philosophy.[180] The three I picked were 2, 6, and 11; the three he liked best were 6, 13, and 14; and since 6 was chosen by both, that title was selected.
It was the first story written by him for Household Words; and in the course of it the old troubles of the Clock came back, with the difference that the greater brevity of the weekly portions made it easier to write them up to time, but much more difficult to get sufficient interest into each. "The difficulty of the space," he wrote after a few weeks' trial, "is crushing. Nobody can have an idea of it who has not had an experience of patient fiction-writing with some elbow-room always, and open places in perspective. In this form, with any kind of regard to the current number, there is absolutely no such thing." He went on, however; and, of the two designs he started with, accomplished one very perfectly and the other at least partially. He more than doubled the circulation of his journal; and he wrote a story which, though not among his best, contains things as characteristic as any he has written. I may not go as far as Mr. Ruskin in giving it a high place; but to anything falling from that writer, however one may differ from it, great respect is due, and every word here said of Dickens's intention is in the most strict sense just.[181] "The essential value and truth of Dickens's writings," he says, "have been unwisely[67] lost sight of by many thoughtful persons, merely because he presents his truth with some colour of caricature. Unwisely, because Dickens's caricature, though often gross, is never mistaken. Allowing for his manner of telling them, the things he tells us are always true. I wish that he could think it right to limit his brilliant exaggeration to works written only for public amusement; and when he takes up a subject of high national importance, such as that which he handled in Hard Times, that he would use severer and more accurate analysis. The usefulness of that work (to my mind, in several respects, the greatest he has written) is with many persons seriously diminished, because Mr. Bounderby is a dramatic monster, instead of a characteristic example of a worldly master; and Stephen Blackpool a dramatic perfection, instead of a characteristic example of an honest workman. But let us not lose the use of Dickens's wit and insight, because he chooses to speak in a circle of stage fire. He is entirely right in his main drift and purpose in every book he has written; and all of them, but especially Hard Times, should be studied with close and earnest care by persons interested in social questions. They will find much that is partial, and, because partial, apparently unjust; but if they examine all the evidence on the other side, which Dickens seems to overlook, it will appear, after all their trouble, that his view was the finally right one, grossly and sharply told."[182] The best points in it, out of the circle[68] of stage fire (an expression of wider application to this part of Dickens's life than its inventor supposed it to be), were the sketches of the riding-circus people and the Bounderby household; but it is a wise hint of Mr. Ruskin's that there may be, in the drift of a story, truths of sufficient importance to set against defects of workmanship; and here they challenged wide attention. You cannot train any one properly, unless you cultivate the fancy, and allow fair scope to the affections. You cannot govern men on a principle of averages; and to buy in the cheapest and sell in the dearest market is not the summum bonum of life. You cannot treat the working man fairly unless, in dealing with his wrongs and his delusions, you take equally into account the simplicity and tenacity of his nature, arising partly from limited knowledge, but more from honesty and singleness of intention. Fiction cannot prove a case, but it can express forcibly a righteous sentiment; and this is here done unsparingly upon matters of universal[69] concern. The book was finished at Boulogne in the middle of July,[183] and is inscribed to Carlyle.
It was the first story he wrote for Household Words; and as he worked on it, the old issues from the Clock resurfaced, with the main difference being that the shorter weekly installments made it easier to finish them on time, but much harder to inject enough interest into each one. "The challenge of the space," he wrote after a few weeks of trying, "is crushing. No one can understand it unless they've experienced the patience of fiction-writing with some room to breathe and clear horizons in view. In this format, with any concern for the current issue, there is absolutely no such thing." Nonetheless, he continued; and of the two ideas he began with, he succeeded perfectly with one and at least partially with the other. He more than doubled the circulation of his journal; and he wrote a story that, while not his best, contains elements as characteristic as any of his work. I may not go as far as Mr. Ruskin in placing it highly, but any statement from that writer deserves great respect, and everything said here about Dickens's intention is strictly accurate.[181] "The essential value and truth of Dickens's writings," he states, "have been foolishly[67] overlooked by many thoughtful individuals simply because he presents his truth with some elements of caricature. Foolishly, because Dickens's caricature, though often exaggerated, is never misleading. Despite his storytelling style, the events he describes are always true. I wish he would think it right to limit his brilliant exaggeration to works meant solely for public entertainment; and when he addresses a subject of significant national importance, like the one in Hard Times, I wish he would apply stricter and more precise analysis. The usefulness of that work (in my opinion, one of his greatest) is significantly reduced for many people because Mr. Bounderby is a dramatic exaggeration rather than a realistic example of a worldly master; and Stephen Blackpool is a dramatic ideal instead of a true representation of an honest worker. However, let’s not overlook Dickens's wit and insights just because he chooses to narrate in a somewhat theatrical manner. He is completely correct in his overall message and intent in every book he has written; all of them, especially Hard Times, should be studied with careful attention by those interested in social issues. They will find much that seems biased, and, because of that bias, seemingly unfair; but if they consider all the opposing evidence that Dickens seems to ignore, they will ultimately find, after their efforts, that his perspective was indeed the accurate one, though expressed in a crude and pointed manner."[182] The standout elements, outside of the theatrical aspects (a phrase more broadly related to this part of Dickens's life than its originator might have thought), were the portrayals of the circus riders and the Bounderby family; but Mr. Ruskin wisely notes that there may be essential truths within the direction of a story that can outweigh its craftsmanship flaws; and here they drew significant attention. You cannot train anyone effectively unless you nurture their creativity and provide ample space for their emotions. You cannot lead people based on averages; and buying low and selling high is not the summum bonum of life. You cannot treat the working person fairly unless, when addressing their grievances and misconceptions, you equally consider the simplicity and persistence of their character, stemming partly from limited understanding, but mostly from honesty and straightforward intentions. Fiction cannot prove a point, but it can strongly convey a just sentiment; and this is done here unreservedly on issues of universal[69] concern. The book was completed in Boulogne in mid-July,[183] and is dedicated to Carlyle.
An American admirer accounted for the vivacity of the circus-scenes by declaring that Dickens had "arranged with the master of Astley's Circus to spend many hours behind the scenes with the riders and among the horses;" a thing just as likely as that he went into training as a stroller to qualify for Mr. Crummles in Nickleby. Such successes belonged to the experiences of his youth; he had nothing to add to what his marvellous observation had made familiar from almost childish days; and the glimpses we get of them in the Sketches by Boz are in these points as perfect as anything his later experience could supply. There was one thing nevertheless which the choice of his subject made him anxious to verify while Hard Times was in hand; and this was a strike in a manufacturing town. He went to Preston to see one at the end of January, and was somewhat disappointed. "I am afraid I shall not be able to get much here. Except the crowds at the street-corners reading the placards pro and con; and the cold absence of smoke from the mill-chimneys; there is very little in the streets to make the town remarkable. I am told that the people[70] 'sit at home and mope.' The delegates with the money from the neighbouring places come in to-day to report the amounts they bring; and to-morrow the people are paid. When I have seen both these ceremonies, I shall return. It is a nasty place (I thought it was a model town); and I am in the Bull Hotel, before which some time ago the people assembled supposing the masters to be here, and on demanding to have them out were remonstrated with by the landlady in person. I saw the account in an Italian paper, in which it was stated that 'the populace then environed the Palazzo Bull, until the padrona of the Palazzo heroically appeared at one of the upper windows and addressed them!' One can hardly conceive anything less likely to be represented to an Italian mind by this description, than the old, grubby, smoky, mean, intensely formal red brick house with a narrow gateway and a dingy yard, to which it applies. At the theatre last night I saw Hamlet, and should have done better to 'sit at home and mope' like the idle workmen. In the last scene, Laertes on being asked how it was with him replied (verbatim) 'Why, like a woodcock—on account of my treachery.'" (29th Jan.)
An American fan explained the liveliness of the circus scenes by saying that Dickens had "made arrangements with the master of Astley's Circus to spend many hours backstage with the performers and among the horses;" which is as likely as him training as a performer to prepare for Mr. Crummles in Nickleby. Such successes were part of his youthful experiences; he had nothing new to add to what his remarkable observation made familiar since he was almost a child. The glimpses we get of them in the Sketches by Boz are just as perfect as anything his later experiences could provide. However, there was one thing that he wanted to verify while he was working on Hard Times; that was a strike in a manufacturing town. He went to Preston to check one out at the end of January but felt somewhat let down. "I’m afraid I won’t find much here. Except for the crowds at the street corners reading the pro and con placards, and the cold absence of smoke from the mill chimneys, there’s very little in the streets that makes the town stand out. I’m told that the people ‘sit at home and mope.’ The delegates with the funds from neighboring areas are coming in today to report the amounts they bring; and tomorrow the people will be paid. Once I’ve seen both of these events, I’ll head back. It’s a dreary place (I thought it was a model town); and I’m at the Bull Hotel, where not long ago people gathered, thinking the masters were here, and when they demanded to see them, the landlady confronted them herself. I read about it in an Italian newspaper, which said that 'the crowd then surrounded the Palazzo Bull, until the padrona of the Palazzo heroically appeared at one of the upper windows and addressed them!' It’s hard to imagine anything less likely to fit an Italian mind based on this description than the old, grimy, smoky, shabby, intensely formal red brick building with a narrow entrance and a dingy yard it refers to. Last night at the theater, I watched Hamlet, and I would have been better off ‘sitting at home and moping’ like the idle workers. In the last scene, when Laertes was asked how he was doing, he replied (word for word) 'Why, like a woodcock—on account of my treachery.'" (29th Jan.)
The home incidents of the summer and autumn of 1855 may be mentioned briefly. It was a year of much unsettled discontent with him, and upon return from a short trip to Paris with Mr. Wilkie Collins, he flung himself rather hotly into agitation with the administrative reformers,[184] and spoke at one of the great meetings[71] in Drury-lane Theatre. In the following month (April) he took occasion, even from the chair of the General Theatrical Fund, to give renewed expression to political dissatisfactions.[185] In the summer he threw open to many friends his Tavistock House Theatre, having secured for its "lessee and manager Mr. Crummles;" for its poet Mr. Wilkie Collins, in an "entirely new and original domestic melodrama;" and for its scene-painter "Mr. Stanfield, R.A."[186] The Lighthouse, by[72] Mr. Wilkie Collins, was then produced, its actors being Mr. Crummles the manager (Dickens in other words), the Author of the play, Mr. Lemon and Mr. Egg, and the manager's sister-in-law and eldest daughter. It was followed by the Guild farce of Mr. Nightingale's Diary, in which besides the performers named, and Dickens in his old personation part, the manager's youngest daughter and Mr. Frank Stone assisted. The success was wonderful; and in the three delighted audiences who crowded to what the bills described as "the smallest theatre in the world," were not a few of the notabilities of London. Mr. Carlyle compared Dickens's wild picturesqueness in the old lighthouse keeper to the famous figure in Nicholas Poussin's bacchanalian dance in the National Gallery; and at one of the joyous suppers that followed on each night of the play, Lord Campbell told the company that he had much rather have written Pickwick than be Chief Justice of England and a peer of parliament.[187]
The events at home during the summer and fall of 1855 can be summed up briefly. It was a year filled with a lot of dissatisfaction for him, and after returning from a short trip to Paris with Mr. Wilkie Collins, he dove headfirst into activism with the administration reformers,[184] and spoke at one of the large gatherings[71] at Drury Lane Theatre. The following month (April), he took the opportunity, even from the chair of the General Theatrical Fund, to voice his political frustrations again.[185] In the summer, he opened up his Tavistock House Theatre to many friends, securing Mr. Crummles as the "lessee and manager;" Mr. Wilkie Collins as the poet, handling an "entirely new and original domestic melodrama;" and "Mr. Stanfield, R.A." as the scene-painter.[186] The Lighthouse, by[72] Mr. Wilkie Collins, was then staged, with Mr. Crummles as the manager (which was Dickens himself), the playwright, Mr. Lemon and Mr. Egg, along with the manager's sister-in-law and eldest daughter. This was followed by the Guild farce Mr. Nightingale's Diary, featuring, in addition to the performers mentioned, Dickens in his classic role, the manager's youngest daughter, and Mr. Frank Stone. The success was incredible; the three ecstatic audiences who packed what the flyers called "the smallest theatre in the world" included several notable figures from London. Mr. Carlyle likened Dickens's lively portrayal of the old lighthouse keeper to the renowned figure in Nicholas Poussin's bacchanalian dance at the National Gallery; and at one of the cheerful dinners that followed each night of the play, Lord Campbell told the group that he would much rather have written Pickwick than be Chief Justice of England and a member of the House of Lords.[187]
Then came the beginning of Nobody's Fault, as Little Dorrit continued to be called by him up to the eve of its publication; a flight to Folkestone to help[73] his sluggish fancy; and his return to London in October to preside at a dinner to Thackeray on his going to lecture in America. It was a muster of more than sixty admiring entertainers, and Dickens's speech gave happy expression to the spirit that animated all, telling Thackeray not alone how much his friendship was prized by those present, and how proud they were of his genius, but offering him in the name of the tens of thousands absent who had never touched his hand or seen his face, life-long thanks for the treasures of mirth, wit, and wisdom within the yellow-covered numbers of Pendennis and Vanity Fair. Peter Cunningham, one of the sons of Allan, was secretary to the banquet; and for many pleasures given to the subject of this memoir, who had a hearty regard for him, should have a few words to his memory.
Then came the start of Nobody's Fault, which he still called Little Dorrit right up until its release; a trip to Folkestone to inspire his slow imagination; and his return to London in October to host a dinner for Thackeray as he was heading off to lecture in America. It was a gathering of over sixty admiring hosts, and Dickens's speech perfectly captured the vibe, expressing how much everyone valued Thackeray's friendship and how proud they were of his talent. He also conveyed, on behalf of the countless others who had never met him or seen him, their lifelong gratitude for the joy, humor, and wisdom found in the pages of Pendennis and Vanity Fair. Peter Cunningham, one of Allan's sons, served as the banquet's secretary, and for the many joys he brought to the subject of this memoir—who held him in high regard—he deserves a few words of remembrance.
His presence was always welcome to Dickens, and indeed to all who knew him, for his relish of social life was great, and something of his keen enjoyment could not but be shared by his company. His geniality would have carried with it a pleasurable glow even if it had stood alone, and it was invigorated by very considerable acquirements. He had some knowledge of the works of eminent authors and artists; and he had an eager interest in their lives and haunts, which he had made the subject of minute and novel enquiry. This store of knowledge gave substance to his talk, yet never interrupted his buoyancy and pleasantry, because only introduced when called for, and not made matter of parade or display. But the happy combination of qualities that rendered him a favourite companion, and won him many friends, proved in the end injurious to[74] himself. He had done much while young in certain lines of investigation which he had made almost his own, and there was every promise that, in the department of biographical and literary research, he would have produced much weightier works with advancing years. This however was not to be. The fascinations of good fellowship encroached more and more upon literary pursuits, until he nearly abandoned his former favourite studies, and sacrificed all the deeper purposes of his life to the present temptation of a festive hour. Then his health gave way, and he became lost to friends as well as to literature. But the impression of the bright and amiable intercourse of his better time survived, and his old associates never ceased to think of Peter Cunningham with regret and kindness.
His presence was always welcomed by Dickens and by everyone who knew him because he had a great appreciation for social life, and his enthusiasm was contagious. His warmth would have created a pleasant atmosphere on its own, but it was enhanced by his considerable knowledge. He was familiar with the works of notable authors and artists, and he had a keen interest in their lives and the places they frequented, which he explored in detail. This wealth of knowledge added depth to his conversations without dampening his liveliness and humor, as he only shared it when appropriate and never forced it into the spotlight. However, this delightful mix of qualities that made him a beloved companion and allowed him to make many friends ultimately turned against him. He had accomplished a lot at a young age in specific areas of study that he had nearly made his own, and there was every indication that, in the field of biographical and literary research, he would have created much more significant works as he got older. Unfortunately, that didn’t happen. The allure of good company increasingly encroached on his literary pursuits until he nearly abandoned his previous favorite studies and sacrificed the deeper goals of his life for the immediate pleasure of a festive moment. Then his health deteriorated, and he became distant from friends as well as from literature. Still, the memory of the bright and friendly interactions from his better days remained, and his old friends never stopped remembering Peter Cunningham with nostalgia and warmth.
Dickens went to Paris early in October, and at its close was brought again to London by the sudden death of a friend, much deplored by himself, and still more so by a distinguished lady who had his loyal service at all times. An incident before his return to France is worth brief relation. He had sallied out for one of his night walks, full of thoughts of his story, one wintery rainy evening (the 8th of November), and "pulled himself up," outside the door of Whitechapel Workhouse, at a strange sight which arrested him there. Against the dreary enclosure of the house were leaning, in the midst of the downpouring rain and storm, what seemed to be seven heaps of rags: "dumb, wet, silent horrors" he described them, "sphinxes set up against that dead wall, and no one likely to be at the pains of solving them until the General Overthrow." He sent in his card to the Master. Against him there was no[75] ground of complaint; he gave prompt personal attention; but the casual ward was full, and there was no help. The rag-heaps were all girls, and Dickens gave each a shilling. One girl, "twenty or so," had been without food a day and night. "Look at me," she said, as she clutched the shilling, and without thanks shuffled off. So with the rest. There was not a single "thank you." A crowd meanwhile, only less poor than these objects of misery, had gathered round the scene; but though they saw the seven shillings given away they asked for no relief to themselves, they recognized in their sad wild way the other greater wretchedness, and made room in silence for Dickens to walk on.
Dickens went to Paris early in October, and by the end of the month, he returned to London due to the sudden death of a friend, which he greatly mourned, as did a notable lady who always counted on his loyalty. An incident before his return to France is worth mentioning. He had gone out for one of his evening walks, lost in thoughts about his story, on a cold, rainy night (November 8), when he stopped abruptly outside the Whitechapel Workhouse, struck by a strange sight. Leaning against the dreary wall of the house, in the pouring rain and storm, were what appeared to be seven piles of rags: "dumb, wet, silent horrors," he described them, "sphinxes set up against that dead wall, and no one likely to take the trouble to figure them out until the General Overthrow." He sent his card in to the Master. There was no reason for complaint against him; he provided immediate personal attention, but the casual ward was full, and there was no help available. The rag piles were all girls, and Dickens gave each one a shilling. One girl, "about twenty," had been without food for a day and night. "Look at me," she said as she grabbed the shilling and walked away without a word of thanks. The same went for the others. Not a single "thank you" was heard. Meanwhile, a crowd, only slightly better off than the miserable girls, had gathered around the scene; but even though they saw seven shillings handed out, they didn't ask for anything for themselves. In their sad, quiet way, they recognized the greater suffering of those girls and silently made way for Dickens to continue walking.
Not more tolerant of the way in which laws meant to be most humane are too often administered in England, he left in a day or two to resume his Little Dorrit in Paris. But before his life there is described, some sketches from his holiday trip to Italy with Mr. Wilkie Collins and Mr. Augustus Egg, and from his three summer visits to Boulogne, claim to themselves two intervening chapters.
Not more accepting of how laws that are supposed to be the most compassionate are often enforced in England, he left in a day or two to continue his Little Dorrit in Paris. However, before detailing his life there, some stories from his holiday trip to Italy with Mr. Wilkie Collins and Mr. Augustus Egg, as well as from his three summer visits to Boulogne, deserve two intervening chapters.
CHAPTER III.
SWITZERLAND AND ITALY REVISITED.
1853.
The first news of the three travellers was from Chamounix, on the 20th of October; and in it there was little made of the fatigue, and much of the enjoyment, of their Swiss travel. Great attention and cleanliness at the inns, very small windows and very bleak passages, doors opening to wintery blasts, overhanging eaves and external galleries, plenty of milk, honey, cows, and goats, much singing towards sunset on mountain sides, mountains almost too solemn to look at—that was the picture of it, with the country everywhere in one of its finest aspects, as winter began to close in. They had started from Geneva the previous morning at four, and in their day's travel Dickens had again noticed what he spoke of formerly, the ill-favoured look of the people in the valleys owing to[77] their hard and stern climate. "All the women were like used-up men, and all the men like a sort of fagged dogs. But the good, genuine, grateful Swiss recognition of the commonest kind word—not too often thrown to them by our countrymen—made them quite radiant. I walked the greater part of the way, which was like going up the Monument." On the day the letter was written they had been up to the Mer de Glace, finding it not so beautiful in colour as in summer, but grander in its desolation; the green ice, like the greater part of the ascent, being covered with snow. "We were alarmingly near to a very dismal accident. We were a train of four mules and two guides, going along an immense height like a chimney-piece, with sheer precipice below, when there came rolling from above, with fearful velocity, a block of stone about the size of one of the fountains in Trafalgar-square, which Egg, the last of the party, had preceded by not a yard, when it swept over the ledge, breaking away a tree, and rolled and tumbled down into the valley. It had been loosened by the heavy rains, or by some wood-cutters afterwards reported to be above." The only place new to Dickens was Berne: "a surprisingly picturesque old Swiss town, with a view of the Alps from the outside of it singularly beautiful in the morning light." Everything else was familiar to him: though at that winter season, when the inns were shutting up, and all who could afford it were off to Geneva, most things in the valley struck him with a new aspect. From such of his old friends as he found at Lausanne, where a day or two's rest was taken, he had the gladdest of greetings; "and the wonderful manner in[78] which they turned out in the wettest morning ever beheld for a Godspeed down the Lake was really quite pathetic."
The first news of the three travelers came from Chamounix on October 20th; and it focused less on their exhaustion and more on the joy of their Swiss journey. The inns were very clean and well-kept, with tiny windows and cold corridors, doors that opened to winter winds, overhanging eaves, and outdoor galleries. They encountered plenty of milk, honey, cows, and goats, and heard lots of singing at sunset on the mountainsides. The mountains were almost too serious to gaze upon—that was the scene, as the landscape showed off its beauty with winter approaching. They had left Geneva the previous morning at four, and during their travels that day, Dickens noted again the unappealing appearance of the people in the valleys, which he attributed to[77] the harsh and severe climate. "All the women looked like worn-out men, and all the men resembled tired dogs. But the genuine, thankful recognition from the Swiss for even the simplest kind word—rarely given by our countrymen—made them glow with happiness. I walked most of the way, which felt like climbing up a monument." On the day the letter was written, they had visited the Mer de Glace, finding it less colorful than in summer but more impressive in its emptiness; the green ice, like much of the ascent, was covered in snow. "We had a very close call with a dire accident. We were a group of four mules and two guides traversing a massive height that felt like a chimney, with a sheer drop below, when suddenly a large rock, about the size of one of the fountains in Trafalgar Square, came tumbling down from above at a terrifying speed. Egg, the last member of our party, had just gone ahead by mere inches when the rock swept over the edge, breaking off a tree, and crashed down into the valley. It had been loosened by the heavy rains or by some woodcutters who were later reported to be above." The only new place for Dickens was Berne: "a surprisingly picturesque old Swiss town, with an outside view of the Alps that was stunningly beautiful in the morning light." Everything else was familiar to him; although during that winter season, when the inns were closing and everyone who could was leaving for Geneva, many things in the valley struck him with a fresh perspective. He received warm greetings from his old friends he encountered in Lausanne, where he paused for a day or two; "and the amazing way they showed up on the wettest morning ever witnessed to wish us a safe journey down the lake was truly quite touching."
He had found time to see again the deaf, dumb, and blind youth at Mr. Haldimand's Institution who had aroused so deep an interest in him seven years before, but, in his brief present visit, the old associations would not reawaken. "Tremendous efforts were made by Hertzel to impress him with an idea of me, and the associations belonging to me; but it seemed in my eyes quite a failure, and I much doubt if he had the least perception of his old acquaintance. According to his custom, he went on muttering strange eager sounds like Town and Down and Mown, but nothing more. I left ten francs to be spent in cigars for my old friend. If I had taken one with me, I think I could, more successfully than his master, have established my identity." The child similarly afflicted, the little girl whom he saw at the same old time, had been after some trial discharged as an idiot.
He had found time to see again the deaf, mute, and blind youth at Mr. Haldimand's Institution who had intrigued him so much seven years earlier, but during his short visit this time, the old feelings didn’t resurface. "Tremendous efforts were made by Hertzel to help him remember me and the connections we had; however, it seemed to me quite a failure, and I seriously doubt he recognized his former acquaintance at all. True to his habits, he continued to mutter strange eager sounds like Town and Down and Mown, but nothing more. I left ten francs to be spent on cigars for my old friend. If I had brought one with me, I think I could have established my identity better than his caregiver did." The girl with a similar condition, the little girl he had seen during the same old time, had been discharged after some time as being an idiot.
Before October closed, the travellers had reached Genoa, having been thirty-one consecutive hours on the road from Milan. They arrived in somewhat damaged condition, and took up their lodging in the top rooms of the Croce di Malta, "overlooking the port and sea pleasantly and airily enough, but it was no joke to get so high, and the apartment is rather vast and faded." The warmth of personal greeting that here awaited Dickens was given no less to the friends who accompanied him, and though the reader may not share in such private confidences as would show the sensation created by his reappearance, and the jovial hours that[79] were passed among old associates, he will perhaps be interested to know how far the intervening years had changed the aspect of things and places made pleasantly familiar to us in his former letters. He wrote to his sister-in-law that the old walks were pretty much the same as ever except that there had been building behind the Peschiere up the San Bartolomeo hill, and the whole town towards San Pietro d'Arena had been quite changed. The Bisagno looked just the same, stony just then, having very little water in it; the vicoli were fragrant with the same old flavour of "very rotten cheese kept in very hot blankets;" and everywhere he saw the mezzaro as of yore. The Jesuits' College in the Strada Nuova was become, under the changed government, the Hôtel de Ville, and a splendid caffè with a terrace-garden had arisen between it and Palaviccini's old palace. "Pal himself has gone to the dogs." Another new and handsome caffè had been built in the Piazza Carlo Felice, between the old one of the Bei Arti and the Strada Carlo Felice; and the Teatro Diurno had now stone galleries and seats, like an ancient amphitheatre. "The beastly gate and guardhouse in the Albaro road are still in their dear old beastly state; and the whole of that road is just as it was. The man without legs is still in the Strada Nuova; but the beggars in general are all cleared off, and our old one-arm'd Belisario made a sudden evaporation a year or two ago. I am going to the Peschiere to-day." To myself he described his former favourite abode as converted into a girls' college; all the paintings of gods and goddesses canvassed over, and the gardens gone to ruin; "but O! what a wonderful place!" He observed[80] an extraordinary increase everywhere else, since he was last in the splendid city, of "life, growth, and enterprise;" and he declared his old conviction to be confirmed that for picturesque beauty and character there was nothing in Italy, Venice excepted, "near brilliant old Genoa."
Before October ended, the travelers arrived in Genoa after thirty-one straight hours of traveling from Milan. They got there a bit worse for wear and checked into the top rooms of the Croce di Malta, which offered a nice view of the port and sea, though climbing up there was no easy feat, and the room was quite large and worn out. The warm welcome awaiting Dickens was extended to his friends as well, and even though the reader might not be privy to the private conversations that showed the excitement surrounding his return and the fun times spent with old friends, they might be interested to see how much the years had changed the familiar sights and places he previously described in his letters. He wrote to his sister-in-law that the old walks were mostly the same as before, except there had been construction behind the Peschiere up San Bartolomeo hill, and the whole area towards San Pietro d'Arena had changed quite a bit. The Bisagno looked the same, quite stony then, with very little water flowing; the narrow streets still had that same old smell of "very rotten cheese kept in very hot blankets;" and he noticed the mezzaro as he had before. The Jesuits' College in Strada Nuova had now become the Hôtel de Ville under the new government, and a nice café with a terrace garden had popped up between it and Palaviccini's old palace. "Pal himself has gone downhill." Another new and stylish café had been built in Piazza Carlo Felice, nestled between the old one at Bei Arti and Strada Carlo Felice; and Teatro Diurno had now been updated with stone galleries and seats, resembling an ancient amphitheater. "The awful gate and guardhouse on Albaro road are still in their beloved terrible state; and that whole road is just as it was. The man without legs is still on Strada Nuova, but most of the beggars have disappeared, and our old one-armed Belisario vanished suddenly a year or two ago. I’m heading to the Peschiere today." He told me that his old favorite place had turned into a girls' college, with all the paintings of gods and goddesses covered up, and the gardens have fallen into disrepair; "but oh! what a fantastic place!" He noted an incredible increase in "life, growth, and enterprise" everywhere else since his last visit to the beautiful city and reaffirmed his belief that for picturesque beauty and charm, nothing in Italy, except Venice, compared to "brilliant old Genoa."
The voyage thence to Naples, written from the latter place, is too capital a description to be lost. The steamer in which they embarked was "the new express English ship," but they found her to be already more than full of passengers from Marseilles (among them an old friend, Sir Emerson Tennent, with his family), and everything in confusion. There were no places at the captain's table, dinner had to be taken on deck, no berth or sleeping accommodation was available, and heavy first-class fares had to be paid. Thus they made their way to Leghorn, where worse awaited them. The authorities proved to be not favourable to the "crack" English-officered vessel (she had just been started for the India mail); and her papers not being examined in time, it was too late to steam away again that day, and she had to lie all night long off the lighthouse. "The scene on board beggars description. Ladies on the tables; gentlemen under the tables; bed-room appliances not usually beheld in public airing themselves in positions where soup-tureens had been lately developing themselves; and ladies and gentlemen lying indiscriminately on the open deck, arranged like spoons on a sideboard. No mattresses, no blankets, nothing. Towards midnight attempts were made, by means of awning and flags, to make this latter scene remotely approach an Australian encampment; and we three[81] (Collins, Egg, and self) lay together on the bare planks covered with our coats. We were all gradually dozing off, when a perfectly tropical rain fell, and in a moment drowned the whole ship. The rest of the night we passed upon the stairs, with an immense jumble of men and women. When anybody came up for any purpose we all fell down, and when anybody came down we all fell up again. Still, the good-humour in the English part of the passengers was quite extraordinary. . . . There were excellent officers aboard, and, in the morning, the first mate lent me his cabin to wash in—which I afterwards lent to Egg and Collins. Then we, the Emerson Tennents, the captain, the doctor, and the second officer, went off on a jaunt together to Pisa, as the ship was to lie all day at Leghorn. The captain was a capital fellow, but I led him, facetiously, such a life the whole day, that I got most things altered at night. Emerson Tennent's son, with the greatest amiability, insisted on turning out of his state-room for me, and I got a good bed there. The store-room down by the hold was opened for Collins and Egg; and they slept with the moist sugar, the cheese in cut, the spices, the cruets, the apples and pears, in a perfect chandler's shop—in company with what a friend of ours would call a hold gent, who had been so horribly wet through over night that his condition frightened the authorities; a cat; and the steward, who dozed in an arm-chair, and all-night-long fell head foremost, once every five minutes, on Egg, who slept on the counter or dresser. Last night, I had the steward's own cabin, opening on deck, all to myself. It had been previously occupied by some desolate lady who went ashore at Civita Vecchia.[82] There was little or no sea, thank Heaven, all the trip; but the rain was heavier than any I have ever seen, and the lightning very constant and vivid. We were, with the crew, some 200 people—provided with boats, at the utmost stretch, for one hundred perhaps. I could not help thinking what would happen if we met with any accident: the crew being chiefly Maltese, and evidently fellows who would cut off alone in the largest boat, on the least alarm; the speed very high; and the running, thro' all the narrow rocky channels. Thank God, however, here we are."
The journey from there to Naples, written from Naples, is too important a description to be ignored. The steamer they boarded was labeled "the new express English ship," but they found it to be already packed with passengers from Marseilles (including an old friend, Sir Emerson Tennent, with his family), and everything was chaotic. There were no seats available at the captain's table, dinner had to be eaten on deck, there were no sleeping arrangements, and they had to pay high first-class fares. So, they made their way to Leghorn, where worse things awaited them. The authorities were not favorable to the "top" English-officered vessel (which had just launched for the India mail); and because her papers weren't examined in time, it was too late to set sail again that day, so they had to stay overnight off the lighthouse. "The scene on board is beyond description. Ladies were on the tables; gentlemen were under the tables; bedroom items not usually seen in public were airing in places where soup tureens had just been; and ladies and gentlemen lay mixed together on the open deck, arranged like spoons on a sideboard. No mattresses, no blankets, nothing. Around midnight, attempts were made, using awnings and flags, to make this scene somewhat resemble an Australian campsite; and the three of us (Collins, Egg, and I) lay on the bare planks covered with our coats. We were all gradually dozing off when a tropical rain fell, instantly saturating the entire ship. The rest of the night was spent on the stairs, amidst a huge jumble of men and women. When someone came up for any reason, we all fell down, and when someone came down, we all fell up again. Still, the good humor among the English passengers was quite remarkable... There were excellent officers on board, and in the morning, the first mate let me use his cabin to wash up—which I later lent to Egg and Collins. Then, the Emerson Tennents, the captain, the doctor, the second officer, and I took a trip together to Pisa, since the ship was staying in Leghorn all day. The captain was a great guy, but I jokingly led him a merry chase all day, and I managed to get most things changed by night. Emerson Tennent's son kindly offered to give up his state room for me, and I had a good bed there. The storeroom down by the hold was opened for Collins and Egg, and they slept surrounded by moist sugar, cut cheese, spices, cruets, apples, and pears, in a perfect grocery store—along with what a friend of ours would call a "hold gent," who had gotten horribly drenched overnight to the point that his condition scared the authorities; a cat; and the steward, who dozed in an armchair and kept falling headfirst onto Egg, who was sleeping on the counter or dresser, every five minutes. Last night, I had the steward's own cabin, opening onto the deck, all to myself. It had been previously occupied by some lonely lady who disembarked at Civita Vecchia. Thankfully, there was little to no sea during the whole trip; but the rain was heavier than anything I've ever seen, and the lightning was constant and bright. With the crew, we made about 200 people—equipped with boats, stretched to the utmost for perhaps a hundred. I couldn't help but wonder what would happen if we encountered any trouble: the crew was mostly Maltese and obviously the kind of guys who would jump into the biggest boat at the slightest concern; the speed was extremely high; and we were navigating through all the narrow rocky channels. Thank God, however, here we are."
A whimsical postscript closed the amusing narrative. "We towed from Civita Vecchia the entire Greek navy, I believe; consisting of a little brig of war with no guns, fitted as a steamer, but disabled by having burnt the bottoms of her boilers out, in her first run. She was just big enough to carry the captain and a crew of six or so: but the captain was so covered with buttons and gold that there never would have been room for him on board to put those valuables away, if he hadn't worn them—which he consequently did, all night. Whenever anything was wanted to be done, as slackening the tow-rope or anything of that sort, our officers roared at this miserable potentate, in violent English, through a speaking trumpet; of which he couldn't have understood a word in the most favourable circumstances. So he did all the wrong things first, and the right thing always last. The absence of any knowledge of anything but English on the part of the officers and stewards was most ridiculous. I met an Italian gentleman on the cabin steps yesterday morning, vainly endeavouring to explain that he wanted[83] a cup of tea for his sick wife. And when we were coming out of the harbour at Genoa, and it was necessary to order away that boat of music you remember, the chief officer (called 'aft' for the purpose, as 'knowing something of Italian') delivered himself in this explicit and clear Italian to the principal performer—'Now Signora, if you don't sheer off you'll be run down, so you had better trice up that guitar of yours and put about.'"
A quirky postscript wrapped up the entertaining story. "We towed the entire Greek navy from Civita Vecchia, I think; which included a small warship with no guns, set up as a steamer, but out of commission because it burned out its boiler bottoms on the first trip. It was just big enough to carry the captain and a crew of around six: but the captain was so covered in buttons and gold that there wouldn't have been space for him on board to stash those valuables, if he hadn't been wearing them—which he did all night. Whenever something needed to be done, like loosening the tow-rope or anything similar, our officers yelled at this poor guy, in loud English, through a speaking trumpet; which he couldn't possibly understand, even in the best circumstances. So he always did the wrong things first and the right things last. The fact that the officers and stewards only knew English was utterly ridiculous. I encountered an Italian gentleman on the cabin steps yesterday morning, desperately trying to explain that he wanted[83] a cup of tea for his sick wife. And when we were leaving the harbor at Genoa, and had to send away that band you remember, the chief officer (called 'aft' for this, as he 'knew a bit of Italian') spoke in this clear Italian to the lead performer—'Now Signora, if you don't move aside, you’ll be run down, so you’d better put that guitar away and change course.'"
At Naples some days were passed very merrily; going up Vesuvius and into the buried cities, with Layard who had joined them, and with the Tennents. Here a small adventure befell Dickens specially, in itself extremely unimportant; but told by him with delightful humour in a letter to his sister-in-law. The old idle Frenchman, to whom all things are possible, with his snuff-box and dusty umbrella, and all the delicate and kindly observation, would have enchanted Leigh Hunt, and made his way to the heart of Charles Lamb. After mentioning Mr. Lowther, then English chargé d'affaires in Naples, as a very agreeable fellow who had been at the Rockingham play, he alludes to a meeting at his house. "We had an exceedingly pleasant dinner of eight, preparatory to which I was near having the ridiculous adventure of not being able to find the house and coming back dinnerless. I went in an open carriage from the hotel in all state, and the coachman to my surprise pulled up at the end of the Chiaja. 'Behold the house,' says he, 'of Il Signor Larthoor!'—at the same time pointing with his whip into the seventh heaven where the early stars were shining. 'But the Signor Larthorr,' says I, 'lives at[84] Pausilippo.' 'It is true,' says the coachman (still pointing to the evening star), 'but he lives high up the Salita Sant' Antonio where no carriage ever yet ascended, and that is the house' (evening star as aforesaid), 'and one must go on foot. Behold the Salita Sant' Antonio!' I went up it, a mile and a half I should think, I got into the strangest places among the wildest Neapolitans; kitchens, washing-places, archways, stables, vineyards; was baited by dogs, and answered, in profoundly unintelligible language, from behind lonely locked doors in cracked female voices, quaking with fear; but could hear of no such Englishman, nor any Englishman. Bye and bye, I came upon a polenta-shop in the clouds, where an old Frenchman with an umbrella like a faded tropical leaf (it had not rained in Naples for six weeks) was staring at nothing at all, with a snuff-box in his hand. To him I appealed, concerning the Signor Larthoor. 'Sir,' said he, with the sweetest politeness, 'can you speak French?' 'Sir,' said I, 'a little.' 'Sir,' said he, 'I presume the Signer Loothere'—you will observe that he changed the name according to the custom of his country—'is an Englishman?' I admitted that he was the victim of circumstances and had that misfortune. 'Sir,' said he, 'one word more. Has he a servant with a wooden leg?' 'Great heaven, sir,' said I, 'how do I know? I should think not, but it is possible.' 'It is always,' said the Frenchman, 'possible. Almost all the things of the world are always possible.' 'Sir,' said I—you may imagine my condition and dismal sense of my own absurdity, by this time—'that is true.' He then took an immense pinch of snuff[85] wiped the dust off his umbrella, led me to an arch commanding a wonderful view of the Bay of Naples, and pointed deep into the earth from which I had mounted. 'Below there, near the lamp, one finds an Englishman with a servant with a wooden leg. It is always possible that he is the Signor Loothore.' I had been asked at six o'clock, and it was now getting on for seven. I went back in a state of perspiration and misery not to be described, and without the faintest hope of finding the spot. But as I was going farther down to the lamp, I saw the strangest staircase up a dark corner, with a man in a white waistcoat (evidently hired) standing on the top of it fuming. I dashed in at a venture, found it was the house, made the most of the whole story, and achieved much popularity. The best of it was that as nobody ever did find the place, Lowther had put a servant at the bottom of the Salita to wait 'for an English gentleman;' but the servant (as he presently pleaded), deceived by the moustache, had allowed the English gentleman to pass unchallenged."
In Naples, a few days were spent very joyfully, visiting Vesuvius and the buried cities with Layard, who had joined them, and the Tennents. A small adventure happened to Dickens, which was quite trivial, but he recounted it with delightful humor in a letter to his sister-in-law. The old lazy Frenchman, who believes anything is possible, with his snuff-box and dusty umbrella, and his charming and kind observations, would have charmed Leigh Hunt and won the heart of Charles Lamb. After mentioning Mr. Lowther, the then English chargé d'affaires in Naples, as a very pleasant guy who had attended the Rockingham play, he mentioned a gathering at his house. "We had a very enjoyable dinner with eight people, and just before that, I almost had the ridiculous misadventure of not being able to find the house and coming back without dinner. I took a grand open carriage from the hotel, and to my surprise, the coachman stopped at the end of the Chiaja. 'Here is the house,' he said, 'of Il Signor Larthoor!'—pointing with his whip toward the heavens where the early stars were shining. 'But Signor Larthoor,' I said, 'lives at[84]Pausilippo.' 'That's true,' said the coachman (still pointing to the evening star), 'but he lives high up the Salita Sant' Antonio where no carriage has ever gone, and that is the house' (pointing to the evening star), 'and you have to go on foot. Behold the Salita Sant' Antonio!' I climbed it, which was a mile and a half, I think, and I ended up in some of the oddest spots among the wildest Neapolitans; kitchens, wash areas, archways, stables, vineyards; I was barked at by dogs and heard incomprehensible responses from behind locked doors in shaky female voices filled with fear, but couldn't find any trace of such an Englishman, or any Englishman for that matter. Eventually, I stumbled upon a polenta shop in the clouds, where an old Frenchman with an umbrella that looked like a faded tropical leaf (it hadn’t rained in Naples for six weeks) was staring off into space with a snuff-box in his hand. I asked him about Signor Larthoor. 'Sir,' he said, with the sweetest politeness, 'do you speak French?' 'Sir,' I replied, 'a little.' 'Sir,' he continued, 'I presume Signor Loothere'—you’ll notice he adjusted the name as is customary in his country—'is an Englishman?' I confirmed that he was unfortunately caught up in circumstances that gave him that misfortune. 'Sir,' he then asked, 'does he have a servant with a wooden leg?' 'Good heavens, sir,' I said, 'how would I know? I doubt it, but it’s possible.' 'It is always,' said the Frenchman, 'possible. Almost everything in the world is always possible.' 'Sir,' I said—you can imagine how I felt and how ridiculous I thought I was by this point—'that's true.' He then took a big pinch of snuff, wiped the dust off his umbrella, led me to an arch with a stunning view of the Bay of Naples, and pointed deep into the ground from where I had come. 'Down there, near the lamp, you’ll find an Englishman with a servant who has a wooden leg. It’s always possible he’s the Signor Loothore.' I was supposed to be there at six o'clock, and it was now getting close to seven. I returned in a state of sweat and misery that was beyond description, with no hope of finding the place. But as I was going further down to the lamp, I spotted the strangest staircase in a dark corner, with a man in a white waistcoat (clearly hired) standing at the top, fuming. I rushed in on a whim, found out it was the house, made the most of the entire story, and gained a lot of popularity. The best part was that since no one ever found the spot, Lowther had sent a servant to wait at the bottom of the Salita 'for an English gentleman;' but the servant (as he later claimed), fooled by the mustache, had let the English gentleman pass without challenging him."
From Naples they went to Rome, where they found Lockhart, "fearfully weak and broken, yet hopeful of himself too" (he died the following year); smoked and drank punch with David Roberts, then painting everyday with Louis Haghe in St. Peter's; and took the old walks. The Coliseum, Appian Way, and Streets of Tombs, seemed desolate and grand as ever; but generally, Dickens adds, "I discovered the Roman antiquities to be smaller than my imagination in nine years had made them. The Electric Telegraph now goes like a sunbeam through the cruel old heart of the[86] Coliseum—a suggestive thing to think about, I fancied. The Pantheon I thought even nobler than of yore." The amusements were of course an attraction; and nothing at the Opera amused the party of three English more, than another party of four Americans who sat behind them in the pit. "All the seats are numbered arm-chairs, and you buy your number at the pay-place, and go to it with the easiest direction on the ticket itself. We were early, and the four places of the Americans were on the next row behind us—all together. After looking about them for some time, and seeing the greater part of the seats empty (because the audience generally wait in a caffè which is part of the theatre), one of them said 'Waal I dunno—I expect we aint no call to set so nigh to one another neither—will you scatter Kernel, will you scatter sir?—' Upon this the Kernel 'scattered' some twenty benches off; and they distributed themselves (for no earthly reason apparently but to get rid of one another) all over the pit. As soon as the overture began, in came the audience in a mass. Then the people who had got the numbers into which they had 'scattered,' had to get them out; and as they understood nothing that was said to them, and could make no reply but 'A-mericani,' you may imagine the number of cocked hats it took to dislodge them. At last they were all got back into their right places, except one. About an hour afterwards when Moses (Moses in Egypt was the opera) was invoking the darkness, and there was a dead silence all over the house, unwonted sounds of disturbance broke out from a distant corner of the pit, and here and there a beard got up to look. 'What is it[87] neow sir?' said one of the Americans to another;—'some person seems to be getting along, again streeem.' 'Waal sir' he replied 'I dunno. But I xpect 'tis the Kernel sir, a holdin on.' So it was. The Kernel was ignominiously escorted back to his right place, not in the least disconcerted, and in perfectly good spirits and temper." The opera was excellently done, and the price of the stalls one and threepence English. At Milan, on the other hand, the Scala was fallen from its old estate, dirty, gloomy, dull, and the performance execrable.
From Naples, they went to Rome, where they found Lockhart, "incredibly weak and broken, yet also hopeful about himself" (he died the following year). They smoked and drank punch with David Roberts, then painted daily with Louis Haghe at St. Peter's, and revisited the old spots. The Coliseum, Appian Way, and Streets of Tombs still felt desolate and grand; but overall, Dickens adds, "I found the Roman antiquities to be smaller than I had imagined over the past nine years. The Electric Telegraph now zips through the cruel old heart of the [86] Coliseum—a thought-provoking thing, I felt. I thought the Pantheon looked even more impressive than before." The entertainment was, of course, a draw; and nothing amused the trio of English visitors more at the opera than a group of four Americans sitting behind them in the pit. "All the seats are numbered armchairs, and you buy your seat number at the pay station and find your spot using the directions on the ticket. We arrived early, and the four Americans were in the row just behind us—all sitting together. After looking around for a bit and noticing most of the seats were empty (because the audience usually waits in a café that's part of the theater), one of them said, 'Well, I don’t know—I guess we don’t really need to sit so close together—will you spread out, Colonel, will you spread out, sir?' Upon this, the Colonel moved 'scattered' about twenty benches away; and they spread themselves out (for no good reason, it seemed, other than to get away from one another) all over the pit. As soon as the overture started, the audience came in a rush. Then the people who had taken the scattered numbers had to get back to their seats, and since they understood nothing that was said to them, and could only respond with 'A-mericans,' you can imagine how many top hats were needed to get them to return. Finally, they were all back in their rightful spots, except for one. About an hour later, when Moses (Moses in Egypt was the opera) was calling for darkness, and there was an absolute silence throughout the house, unusual sounds of disturbance came from a distant corner of the pit, and a few people stood up to look. 'What is it [87] now, sir?' one American asked another;—'it seems like someone is trying to get through, against the tide.' 'Well, sir,' he replied, 'I don’t know. But I guess it’s the Colonel, sir, holding on.' And it was. The Colonel was shamefully escorted back to his rightful seat, completely unfazed, and in perfectly good spirits. The opera was excellently performed, and the price of the stalls was one and threepence. In Milan, however, the Scala had fallen from its former glory, dirty, gloomy, dull, and the performance was terrible.
Another theatre of the smallest pretension Dickens sought out with avidity in Rome, and eagerly enjoyed. He had heard it said in his old time in Genoa that the finest Marionetti were here; and now, after great difficulty, he discovered the company in a sort of stable attached to a decayed palace. "It was a wet night, and there was no audience but a party of French officers and ourselves. We all sat together. I never saw anything more amazing than the performance—altogether only an hour long, but managed by as many as ten people, for we saw them all go behind, at the ringing of a bell. The saving of a young lady by a good fairy from the machinations of an enchanter, coupled with the comic business of her servant Pulcinella (the Roman Punch) formed the plot of the first piece. A scolding old peasant woman, who always leaned forward to scold and put her hands in the pockets of her apron, was incredibly natural. Pulcinella, so airy, so merry, so life-like, so graceful, he was irresistible. To see him carrying an umbrella over his mistress's head in a storm, talking to a prodigious[88] giant whom he met in the forest, and going to bed with a pony, were things never to be forgotten. And so delicate are the hands of the people who move them, that every puppet was an Italian, and did exactly what an Italian does. If he pointed at any object, if he saluted anybody, if he laughed, if he cried, he did it as never Englishman did it since Britain first at Heaven's command arose—arose—arose, &c. There was a ballet afterwards, on the same scale, and we really came away quite enchanted with the delicate drollery of the thing. French officers more than ditto."
Another theater of little pretension that Dickens eagerly sought out in Rome was enjoyed thoroughly. He had heard in his younger days in Genoa that the best Marionetti were here; and now, after much effort, he found the company in a sort of stable attached to a crumbling palace. "It was a rainy night, and the only audience was a group of French officers and us. We all sat together. I had never seen anything more incredible than the performance—only an hour long, but managed by as many as ten people, as we saw them all go behind the scenes when a bell rang. The story was about a young lady being saved by a good fairy from the schemes of an enchanter, along with the comic antics of her servant Pulcinella (the Roman Punch). A scolding old peasant woman, who always leaned forward to nag and put her hands in her apron pockets, was unbelievably realistic. Pulcinella, so lively, so cheerful, so lifelike, so graceful, was simply irresistible. Watching him hold an umbrella over his mistress’s head in a storm, chatting with a huge giant he encountered in the forest, and going to bed with a pony were unforgettable moments. The puppeteers' hands were so skilled that every puppet was Italian, and behaved exactly as an Italian would. When he pointed at something, saluted someone, laughed, or cried, he did it in a way no Englishman ever has since Britain first rose to Heaven’s command—rose—rose, etc. There was a ballet afterward on the same scale, and we truly left feeling enchanted by the delicate humor of it all. The French officers felt the same."
Of the great enemy to the health of the now capital of the kingdom of Italy, Dickens remarked in the same letter. "I have been led into some curious speculations by the existence and progress of the Malaria about Rome. Isn't it very extraordinary to think of its encroaching and encroaching on the Eternal City as if it were commissioned to swallow it up. This year it has been extremely bad, and has long outstayed its usual time. Rome has been very unhealthy, and is not free now. Few people care to be out at the bad times of sunset and sunrise, and the streets are like a desert at night. There is a church, a very little way outside the walls, destroyed by fire some 16 or 18 years ago, and now restored and re-created at an enormous expense. It stands in a wilderness. For any human creature who goes near it, or can sleep near it, after nightfall, it might as well be at the bottom of the uppermost cataract of the Nile. Along the whole extent of the Pontine Marshes (which we came across the other day), no creature in Adam's likeness lives, except[89] the sallow people at the lonely posting-stations. I walk out from the Coliseum through the Street of Tombs to the ruins of the old Appian Way—pass no human being, and see no human habitation but ruined houses from which the people have fled, and where it is Death to sleep: these houses being three miles outside a gate of Rome at its farthest extent. Leaving Rome by the opposite side, we travel for many many hours over the dreary Campagna, shunned and avoided by all but the wretched shepherds. Thirteen hours' good posting brings us to Bolsena (I slept there once before), on the margin of a stagnant lake whence the workpeople fly as the sun goes down—where it is a risk to go; where from a distance we saw a mist hang on the place; where, in the inconceivably wretched inn, no window can be opened; where our dinner was a pale ghost of a fish with an oily omelette, and we slept in great mouldering rooms tainted with ruined arches and heaps of dung—and coming from which we saw no colour in the cheek of man, woman, or child for another twenty miles. Imagine this phantom knocking at the gates of Rome; passing them; creeping along the streets; haunting the aisles and pillars of the churches; year by year more encroaching, and more impossible of avoidance."
Of the major threat to the health of what is now the capital of Italy, Dickens noted in the same letter, "I've been led into some curious thoughts by the presence and spread of Malaria around Rome. Isn’t it strange to think of it gradually taking over the Eternal City, as if it were meant to swallow it whole? This year, it has been particularly bad and has lingered far beyond its typical duration. Rome has been unhealthy and still isn’t safe. Few people want to be outside during the risky times of sunset and sunrise, and the streets are deserted at night. There’s a church not far outside the walls that was destroyed by fire about 16 or 18 years ago, and it’s now been rebuilt at a huge cost. It stands in isolation. For anyone who goes near it or can sleep nearby after dark, it might as well be at the bottom of the highest waterfall of the Nile. Along the entire stretch of the Pontine Marshes (which we passed the other day), no creature resembling a human lives, except for the pale people at the lonely posting stations. I walk out from the Coliseum through the Street of Tombs to the ruins of the old Appian Way—encounter no one, and see no human homes except for abandoned houses where the people have fled, and where it’s dangerous to sleep: these houses are three miles outside a gate of Rome at its furthest edge. Leaving Rome from the other side, we travel for many hours over the bleak Campagna, avoided by all but the miserable shepherds. Thirteen hours of good travel brings us to Bolsena (I slept there once before), by the edge of a stagnant lake where workers flee as the sun sets—where it’s risky to go; where we saw a mist hovering over the place from a distance; where, in the incredibly miserable inn, no window can be opened; where our dinner was a faint shadow of a fish with an oily omelette, and we slept in old, decaying rooms tainted by crumbling arches and piles of dung—and from which we saw no color in the faces of any man, woman, or child for another twenty miles. Imagine this phantom knocking at the gates of Rome; passing through; creeping along the streets; haunting the aisles and pillars of the churches; year by year becoming more invasive and harder to escape."
From Rome they posted to Florence, reaching it in three days and a half, on the morning of the 20th of November; having then been out six weeks, with only three days' rain; and in another week they were at Venice. "The fine weather has accompanied us here," Dickens wrote on the 28th of November, "the place of all others where it is necessary, and the city has been a blaze of sunlight and blue sky (with an extremely[90] clear cold air) ever since we have been in it. If you could see it at this moment you would never forget it. We live in the same house that I lived in nine years ago, and have the same sitting-room—close to the Bridge of Sighs and the Palace of the Doges. The room is at the corner of the house, and there is a narrow street of water running round the side: so that we have the Grand Canal before the two front windows, and this wild little street at the corner window: into which, too, our three bedrooms look. We established a gondola as soon as we arrived, and we slide out of the hall on to the water twenty times a day. The gondoliers have queer old customs that belong to their class, and some are sufficiently disconcerting. . . . It is a point of honour with them, while they are engaged, to be always at your disposal. Hence it is no use telling them they may go home for an hour or two—for they won't go. They roll themselves in shaggy capuccins, great coats with hoods, and lie down on the stone or marble pavement until they are wanted again. So that when I come in or go out, on foot—which can be done from this house for some miles, over little bridges and by narrow ways—I usually walk over the principal of my vassals, whose custom it is to snore immediately across the doorway. Conceive the oddity of the most familiar things in this place, from one instance: Last night we go downstairs at half-past eight, step into the gondola, slide away on the black water, ripple and plash swiftly along for a mile or two, land at a broad flight of steps, and instantly walk into the most brilliant and beautiful theatre conceivable—all silver and blue, and precious little fringes made of glittering prisms of glass. There we[91] sit until half-past eleven, come out again (gondolier asleep outside the box-door), and in a moment are on the black silent water, floating away as if there were no dry building in the world. It stops, and in a moment we are out again, upon the broad solid Piazza of St. Mark, brilliantly lighted with gas, very like the Palais Royal at Paris, only far more handsome, and shining with no end of caffès. The two old pillars and the enormous bell-tower are as gruff and solid against the exquisite starlight as if they were a thousand miles from the sea or any undermining water: and the front of the cathedral, overlaid with golden mosaics and beautiful colours, is like a thousand rainbows even in the night."
From Rome, they traveled to Florence, arriving in three and a half days on the morning of November 20th; they had been on the road for six weeks with only three days of rain. Within another week, they reached Venice. "The nice weather has been with us here," Dickens wrote on November 28th, "the one place where it’s really needed, and the city has been shining with sunlight and blue skies (with an extremely clear, cold air) since we arrived. If you could see it right now, you'd never forget it. We’re staying in the same house I lived in nine years ago, and we have the same sitting room—right by the Bridge of Sighs and the Palace of the Doges. The room is at the corner of the house, and there’s a narrow waterway running around the side: so we have the Grand Canal outside the two front windows, and this wild little street at the corner window, which our three bedrooms also overlook. We arranged for a gondola as soon as we got here, and we glide out of the hall onto the water twenty times a day. The gondoliers have some strange old customs of their own, and some are pretty disconcerting... It’s a point of pride for them to be ready for you while they're on duty. So, it's pointless to tell them they can go home for a bit—they won’t leave. They wrap themselves in shaggy capuccins, big coats with hoods, and lie down on the stone or marble pavement until needed again. So when I come in or go out on foot—which can be done from this house for quite a distance, over little bridges and through narrow paths—I usually walk over my main vassals, who have the habit of snoring right across the doorway. Imagine the oddness of familiar things here, as in this example: Last night we went downstairs at half-past eight, got into the gondola, slid away across the black water, rippling and splashing swiftly for a mile or so, landed at a grand flight of steps, and instantly walked into the most dazzling and beautiful theater imaginable—everything silver and blue, with stunning little fringes made of glittering glass prisms. We stayed there until half-past eleven, exited again (the gondolier asleep outside the door), and in a moment found ourselves back on the black, silent water, floating away as if there were no solid buildings in the world. It stopped, and in no time we were out again, upon the wide, sturdy Piazza of St. Mark, brightly lit by gas, very similar to the Palais Royal in Paris, but far more beautiful, filled with countless cafés. The two old pillars and the massive bell tower looked gruff and solid against the exquisite starlight as if they were a thousand miles from the sea or any undermining water: and the front of the cathedral, adorned with golden mosaics and beautiful colors, resembled a thousand rainbows even in the night."
His formerly expressed notions as to art and pictures in Italy received confirmation at this visit. "I am more than ever confirmed in my conviction that one of the great uses of travelling is to encourage a man to think for himself, to be bold enough always to declare without offence that he does think for himself, and to overcome the villainous meanness of professing what other people have professed when he knows (if he has capacity to originate an opinion) that his profession is untrue. The intolerable nonsense against which genteel taste and subserviency are afraid to rise, in connection with art, is astounding. Egg's honest amazement and consternation when he saw some of the most trumpeted things was what the Americans call 'a caution.' In the very same hour and minute there were scores of people falling into conventional raptures with that very poor Apollo, and passing over the most beautiful little figures and heads in the whole Vatican because[92] they were not expressly set up to be worshipped. So in this place. There are pictures by Tintoretto in Venice, more delightful and masterly than it is possible sufficiently to express. His Assembly of the Blest I do believe to be, take it all in all, the most wonderful and charming picture ever painted. Your guide-book writer, representing the general swarming of humbugs, rather patronizes Tintoretto as a man of some sort of merit; and (bound to follow Eustace, Forsyth, and all the rest of them) directs you, on pain of being broke for want of gentility in appreciation, to go into ecstacies with things that have neither imagination, nature, proportion, possibility, nor anything else in them. You immediately obey, and tell your son to obey. He tells his son, and he tells his, and so the world gets at three-fourths of its frauds and miseries."
His previously stated ideas about art and pictures in Italy were confirmed during this visit. "I am more convinced than ever that one of the main benefits of travel is to encourage a person to think for themselves, to have the courage to openly declare that they do think for themselves, and to reject the shameful habit of echoing what others have said when they know (if they have the ability to form an opinion) that what they're saying is not true. The ridiculous nonsense that genteel taste and conformity are afraid to challenge in connection with art is astonishing. Egg's genuine surprise and shock when he saw some of the most advertised works were what Americans would call 'a warning.' At that very moment, there were dozens of people melodramatically praising that very mediocre Apollo and ignoring the most beautiful little figures and heads in the whole Vatican simply because they weren't put there to be worshipped. The same applies here. There are pictures by Tintoretto in Venice that are more delightful and skillful than one can adequately describe. I truly believe his Assembly of the Blest is, overall, the most incredible and charming painting ever created. Your guidebook writer, reflecting the general influx of phonies, treats Tintoretto as someone with some merit; and (bound to follow Eustace, Forsyth, and the others) tells you, under the threat of losing your social standing in appreciation, to rave about things that lack imagination, nature, proportion, plausibility, or anything else of value. You immediately comply and instruct your son to do the same. He tells his son, and he tells his, and thus the world ends up with three-quarters of its deceptions and suffering."
The last place visited was Turin, where the travellers arrived on the 5th of December, finding it, with a brightly shining sun, intensely cold and freezing hard. "There are double windows to all the rooms, but the Alpine air comes down and numbs my feet as I write (in a cap and shawl) within six feet of the fire." There was yet something better than this to report of that bracing Alpine air. To Dickens's remarks on the Sardinian race, and to what he says of the exile of the noblest Italians, the momentous events of the few following years gave striking comment; nor could better proof be afforded of the judgment he brought to the observation of what passed before him. The letter had in all respects much interest and attractiveness. "This is a remarkably agreeable place. A beautiful town, prosperous, thriving, growing prodigiously, as Genoa[93] is; crowded with busy inhabitants; full of noble streets and squares. The Alps, now covered deep with snow, are close upon it, and here and there seem almost ready to tumble into the houses. The contrast this part of Italy presents to the rest, is amazing. Beautifully made railroads, admirably managed; cheerful, active people; spirit, energy, life, progress. In Milan, in every street, the noble palace of some exile is a barrack, and dirty soldiers are lolling out of the magnificent windows—it seems as if the whole place were being gradually absorbed into soldiers. In Naples, something like a hundred thousand troops. 'I knew,' I said to a certain Neapolitan Marchese there whom I had known before, and who came to see me the night after I arrived, 'I knew a very remarkable gentleman when I was last here; who had never been out of his own country, but was perfectly acquainted with English literature, and had taught himself to speak English in that wonderful manner that no one could have known him for a foreigner; I am very anxious to see him again, but I forget his name.'—He named him, and his face fell directly. 'Dead?' said I.—'In exile.'—'O dear me!' said I, 'I had looked forward to seeing him again, more than any one I was acquainted with in the country!'—'What would you have!' says the Marchese in a low-voice. 'He was a remarkable man—full of knowledge, full of spirit, full of generosity. Where should he be but in exile! Where could he be!' We said not another word about it, but I shall always remember the short dialogue."
The last place they visited was Turin, where the travelers arrived on December 5th, finding it intensely cold and freezing, despite the bright sun. "There are double windows in all the rooms, but the Alpine air comes down and numbs my feet as I write (in a cap and shawl) just six feet from the fire." There was something even more interesting about that refreshing Alpine air. Dickens's comments on the Sardinian people and his thoughts on the exile of the noblest Italians were given powerful context by the significant events of the following years; they showcased the keen judgment he had in observing what unfolded around him. The letter had a lot of charm and appeal. "This is a wonderfully pleasant place. A beautiful town, prosperous, thriving, and growing rapidly, like Genoa[93]; bustling with active residents; filled with grand streets and squares. The Alps, now heavily blanketed with snow, are close by and seem almost ready to crash into the houses. The contrast this part of Italy offers compared to the rest is astounding. Beautifully constructed railroads, wonderfully managed; cheerful, energetic people; spirit, vitality, progress. In Milan, every street has the noble palace of some exile turned into a barracks, with dirty soldiers lounging out of the magnificent windows—it feels like the whole place is slowly being taken over by soldiers. In Naples, there are about a hundred thousand troops. 'I knew,' I said to a Neapolitan Marchese there whom I had met before, and who came to visit me the night after I arrived, 'I knew a very remarkable gentleman when I was last here; he had never been outside his own country but was completely familiar with English literature, and had taught himself to speak English in such an incredible way that no one would have guessed he was a foreigner; I’m really eager to see him again, but I can't remember his name.' He named him, and his expression immediately changed. 'Dead?' I asked. 'In exile.' 'Oh dear!' I said, 'I was really looking forward to seeing him again, more than anyone else I knew in the country!' 'What do you expect!' said the Marchese in a low voice. 'He was a remarkable man—full of knowledge, full of spirit, full of generosity. Where else would he be but in exile? Where could he be!' We didn't say another word about it, but I'll always remember that brief conversation."
On the other hand there were incidents of the Austrian occupation as to which Dickens thought the[94] ordinary style of comment unfair; and his closing remark on their police is well worth preserving. "I am strongly inclined to think that our countrymen are to blame in the matter of the Austrian vexations to travellers that have been complained of. Their manner is so very bad, they are so extraordinarily suspicious, so determined to be done by everybody, and give so much offence. Now, the Austrian police are very strict, but they really know how to do business, and they do it. And if you treat them like gentlemen, they will always respond. When we first crossed the Austrian frontier, and were ushered into the police office, I took off my hat. The officer immediately took off his, and was as polite—still doing his duty, without any compromise—as it was possible to be. When we came to Venice, the arrangements were very strict, but were so business-like that the smallest possible amount of inconvenience consistent with strictness ensued. Here is the scene. A soldier has come into the railway carriage (a saloon on the American plan) some miles off, has touched his hat, and asked for my passport. I have given it. Soldier has touched his hat again, and retired as from the presence of superior officer. Alighted from carriage, we pass into a place like a banking-house, lighted up with gas. Nobody bullies us or drives us there, but we must go, because the road ends there. Several soldierly clerks. One very sharp chief. My passport is brought out of an inner room, certified to be en règle. Very sharp chief takes it, looks at it (it is rather longer, now, than Hamlet), calls out—'Signor Carlo Dickens!' 'Here I am sir.' 'Do you intend remaining long in Venice sir?' 'Probably four[95] days sir!' 'Italian is known to you sir. You have been in Venice before?' 'Once before sir.' 'Perhaps you remained longer then sir?' 'No indeed; I merely came to see, and went as I came.' 'Truly sir? Do I infer that you are going by Trieste?' 'No. I am going to Parma, and Turin, and by Paris home.' 'A cold journey sir, I hope it may be a pleasant one.' 'Thank you.'—He gives me one very sharp look all over, and wishes me a very happy night. I wish him a very happy night and it's done. The thing being done at all, could not be better done, or more politely—though I dare say if I had been sucking a gentish cane all the time, or talking in English to my compatriots, it might not unnaturally have been different. At Turin and at Genoa there are no such stoppages at all; but in any other part of Italy, give me an Austrian in preference to a native functionary. At Naples it is done in a beggarly, shambling, bungling, tardy, vulgar way; but I am strengthened in my old impression that Naples is one of the most odious places on the face of the earth. The general degradation oppresses me like foul air."
On the other hand, there were incidents during the Austrian occupation that Dickens felt the ordinary comments about were unfair, and his final thoughts on their police are worth remembering. "I'm really inclined to think that our countrymen share the blame for the Austrian troubles that travelers have complained about. Their behavior is so poor, they are incredibly suspicious, so set on being taken advantage of by everyone, and they give off a lot of offense. Now, the Austrian police are very strict, but they truly know how to handle their jobs, and they do it well. If you treat them like gentlemen, they will always respond accordingly. When we first crossed the Austrian border and entered the police office, I took off my hat. The officer immediately removed his and was as polite as possible—still doing his duty without any compromise. When we arrived in Venice, the procedures were very strict, but they were so professional that we experienced the least inconvenience possible while still being thorough. Here’s the scene: a soldier entered the train carriage (a lounge like the American style) a few miles back, touched his hat, and asked for my passport. I handed it over. The soldier touched his hat again and left, as if departing from a superior officer. After getting off the train, we entered a place that looked like a bank, lit by gas lights. No one bullied us or rushed us, but we had to go there since the road ended. There were several soldierly clerks and one very sharp chief. My passport was brought out from an inner room, certified to be in order. The sharp chief took it, looked it over (it’s quite lengthy now, more than Hamlet), and called out—'Signor Carlo Dickens!' 'Here I am, sir.' 'Do you plan to stay long in Venice, sir?' 'Probably four days, sir!' 'You know Italian, sir. Have you been in Venice before?' 'Once before, sir.' 'Perhaps you stayed longer then, sir?' 'Not at all; I just came to see and left as I arrived.' 'Really, sir? Do I take it you’re going via Trieste?' 'No. I'm heading to Parma, then Turin, and back home through Paris.' 'A cold journey, sir; I hope it’s a pleasant one.' 'Thank you.'—He gives me a sharp look all over and wishes me a very pleasant night. I return the wish for a pleasant night, and that’s it. The whole process, once it was done, couldn’t have been better or more polite—though I suppose if I had been flaunting a fancy cane the whole time, or chatting in English with my fellow countrymen, it might have been different. In Turin and Genoa, there are no such delays at all; but in any other part of Italy, I’d prefer an Austrian over a native official. In Naples, it’s handled in a pathetic, clumsy, slow, cheap manner; but it reaffirms my old belief that Naples is one of the worst places on earth. The general degradation weighs on me like foul air."
CHAPTER IV.
THREE SUMMERS AT BOULOGNE.
1853, 1854, and 1856.
Dickens was in Boulogne, in 1853, from the middle of June to the end of September, and for the next three months, as we have seen, was in Switzerland and Italy. In the following year he went again to Boulogne in June, and stayed, after finishing Hard Times, until far into October. In February of 1855 he was for a fortnight in Paris with Mr. Wilkie Collins; not taking up his more prolonged residence there until the winter. From November 1855 to the end of April 1856 he made the French capital his home, working at Little Dorrit during all those months. Then, after a month's interval in Dover and London, he took up his third summer residence in Boulogne, whither his younger children had gone direct from Paris; and[97] stayed until September, finishing Little Dorrit in London in the spring of 1857.
Dickens was in Boulogne from mid-June to the end of September in 1853, and for the next three months, as noted, he was in Switzerland and Italy. The following year, he returned to Boulogne in June and stayed there until well into October after finishing Hard Times. In February 1855, he spent two weeks in Paris with Mr. Wilkie Collins; he didn’t settle there more permanently until the winter. From November 1855 to the end of April 1856, he made Paris his home, working on Little Dorrit during that time. After a month in Dover and London, he returned for his third summer in Boulogne, where his younger children had gone straight from Paris; and[97] he stayed until September, completing Little Dorrit in London in the spring of 1857.
Of the first of these visits, a few lively notes of humour and character out of his letters will tell the story sufficiently. The second and third had points of more attractiveness. Those were the years of the French-English alliance, of the great exposition of English paintings, of the return of the troops from the Crimea, and of the visit of the Prince Consort to the Emperor; such interest as Dickens took in these several matters appearing in his letters with the usual vividness, and the story of his continental life coming out with amusing distinctness in the successive pictures they paint with so much warmth and colour. Another chapter will be given to Paris. This deals only with Boulogne.
Of the first of these visits, a few lively notes of humor and character from his letters will tell the story well enough. The second and third had more appealing points. Those were the years of the French-English alliance, the major exhibition of English paintings, the return of the troops from the Crimea, and the visit of the Prince Consort to the Emperor. Dickens' interest in these various matters comes through in his letters with the usual vividness, and the story of his life on the continent emerges with amusing clarity in the successive snapshots they create with so much warmth and color. Another chapter will focus on Paris. This one only deals with Boulogne.
For his first summer residence, in June 1853, he had taken a house on the high ground near the Calais road; an odd French place with the strangest little rooms and halls, but standing in the midst of a large garden, with wood and waterfall, a conservatory opening on a great bank of roses, and paths and gates on one side to the ramparts, on the other to the sea. Above all there was a capital proprietor and landlord, by whom the cost of keeping up gardens and wood (which he called a forest) was defrayed, while he gave his tenant the whole range of both and all the flowers for nothing, sold him the garden produce as it was wanted, and kept a cow on the estate to supply the family milk. "If this were but 300 miles farther off," wrote Dickens, "how the English would rave about it! I do assure you that there are picturesque people, and town, and[98] country, about this place, that quite fill up the eye and fancy. As to the fishing people (whose dress can have changed neither in colour nor in form for many many years), and their quarter of the town cobweb-hung with great brown nets across the narrow up-hill streets, they are as good as Naples, every bit." His description both of house and landlord, of which I tested the exactness when I visited him, was in the old pleasant vein; requiring no connection with himself to give it interest, but, by the charm and ease with which everything picturesque or characteristic was disclosed, placed in the domain of art.
For his first summer residence, in June 1853, he rented a house on the high ground near the Calais road; a quirky French place with the strangest little rooms and halls, but it was set in a large garden with woods and a waterfall, a conservatory opening onto a vast bank of roses, and pathways and gates on one side leading to the ramparts, and on the other to the sea. Above all, there was a fantastic landlord who covered the costs of maintaining the gardens and woods (which he called a forest), while giving his tenant access to both and all the flowers for free, selling the garden produce as needed, and keeping a cow on the property to provide milk for the family. "If this were just 300 miles farther away," wrote Dickens, "how the English would go crazy over it! I assure you there are picturesque people, and towns, and [98] countryside around this place that completely fill the eye and imagination. As for the fishermen (whose clothing hasn’t changed in color or style for many, many years), and their part of the town covered in big brown nets hanging over the narrow, steep streets, they’re every bit as charming as Naples." His description of both the house and landlord, which I confirmed when I visited him, had that old pleasant vibe; it didn't need any connection to him to be interesting, but through the charm and ease with which he revealed everything picturesque or characteristic, it was elevated to the level of art.
"O the rain here yesterday!" (26th of June.) "A great sea-fog rolling in, a strong wind blowing, and the rain coming down in torrents all day long. . . . This house is on a great hill-side, backed up by woods of young trees. It faces the Haute Ville with the ramparts and the unfinished cathedral—which capital object is exactly opposite the windows. On the slope in front, going steep down to the right, all Boulogne is piled and jumbled about in a very picturesque manner. The view is charming—closed in at last by the tops of swelling hills; and the door is within ten minutes of the post-office, and within quarter of an hour of the sea. The garden is made in terraces up the hill-side, like an Italian garden; the top walks being in the before-mentioned woods. The best part of it begins at the level of the house, and goes up at the back, a couple of hundred feet perhaps. There are at present thousands of roses all about the house, and no end of other flowers. There are five great summer-houses, and (I think) fifteen fountains—not one of which[99] (according to the invariable French custom) ever plays. The house is a doll's house of many rooms. It is one story high, with eight and thirty steps up and down—tribune wise—to the front door: the noblest French demonstration I have ever seen I think. It is a double house; and as there are only four windows and a pigeon-hole to be beheld in front, you would suppose it to contain about four rooms. Being built on the hill-side, the top story of the house at the back—there are two stories there—opens on the level of another garden. On the ground floor there is a very pretty hall, almost all glass; a little dining-room opening on a beautiful conservatory, which is also looked into through a great transparent glass in a mirror-frame over the chimney-piece, just as in Paxton's room at Chatsworth; a spare bed-room, two little drawing-rooms opening into one another, the family bed-rooms, a bath-room, a glass corridor, an open yard, and a kind of kitchen with a machinery of stoves and boilers. Above, there are eight tiny bed-rooms all opening on one great room in the roof, originally intended for a billiard-room. In the basement there is an admirable kitchen with every conceivable requisite in it, a noble cellar, first-rate man's room and pantry; coach-house, stable, coal-store and wood-store; and in the garden is a pavilion, containing an excellent spare bed-room on the ground floor. The getting-up of these places, the looking-glasses, clocks, little stoves, all manner of fittings, must be seen to be appreciated. The conservatory is full of choice flowers and perfectly beautiful."
"Oh, the rain here yesterday!" (26th of June.) "A thick sea fog rolled in, a strong wind blowing, and the rain pouring down all day long. This house is on a big hillside, backed by woods of young trees. It faces the Haute Ville with the ramparts and the unfinished cathedral—which main feature is directly across from the windows. The slope in front, steeply descending to the right, has all of Boulogne spread out in a very picturesque way. The view is lovely—finally enclosed by the tops of rolling hills; and the door is just ten minutes from the post office and a quarter of an hour from the sea. The garden is terraced up the hillside, similar to an Italian garden; the upper paths are in the aforementioned woods. The best part starts at the level of the house and goes up at the back, maybe a couple of hundred feet. Right now, there are thousands of roses all around the house, along with countless other flowers. There are five large summerhouses and (I think) fifteen fountains—not one of which[99] (following the usual French custom) ever actually works. The house is like a dollhouse with many rooms. It’s one story high, with thirty-eight steps going up and down—tribune style—to the front door: the grandest French display I've ever seen, I think. It’s a double house; and since there are only four windows and a small opening visible in front, you might think it has around four rooms. Built on the hillside, the top floor at the back—there are two stories there—opens onto the level of another garden. On the ground floor, there’s a very pretty hall, mostly glass; a little dining room leading to a beautiful conservatory, which can also be seen through a large transparent glass framed like a mirror over the fireplace, just like in Paxton's room at Chatsworth; a spare bedroom, two small drawing rooms connecting to each other, the family bedrooms, a bathroom, a glass corridor, an open yard, and a sort of kitchen with a setup of stoves and boilers. Above, there are eight tiny bedrooms all opening onto one large room in the roof, originally meant to be a billiard room. In the basement, there’s a fantastic kitchen with every conceivable necessity, a grand cellar, a first-rate man’s room, and pantry; a coach house, stable, coal store, and wood store; and in the garden is a pavilion, containing a great spare bedroom on the ground floor. The details of these spaces, the mirrors, clocks, little stoves, and all kinds of fittings, have to be seen to be truly appreciated. The conservatory is filled with exquisite flowers and is absolutely beautiful."
Then came the charm of the letter, his description[100] of his landlord, lightly sketched by him in print as M. Loyal-Devasseur, but here filled in with the most attractive touches his loving hand could give. "But the landlord—M. Beaucourt—is wonderful. Everybody here has two surnames (I cannot conceive why), and M. Beaucourt, as he is always called, is by rights M. Beaucourt-Mutuel. He is a portly jolly fellow with a fine open face; lives on the hill behind, just outside the top of the garden; and was a linen draper in the town, where he still has a shop, but is supposed to have mortgaged his business and to be in difficulties—all along of this place, which he has planted with his own hands; which he cultivates all day; and which he never on any consideration speaks of but as 'the Property.' He is extraordinarily popular in Boulogne (the people in the shops invariably brightening up at the mention of his name, and congratulating us on being his tenants), and really seems to deserve it. He is such a liberal fellow that I can't bear to ask him for anything, since he instantly supplies it whatever it is. The things he has done in respect of unreasonable bedsteads and washing-stands, I blush to think of. I observed the other day in one of the side gardens—there are gardens at each side of the house too—a place where I thought the Comic Countryman" (a name he was giving just then to his youngest boy) "must infallibly trip over, and make a little descent of a dozen feet. So I said, 'M. Beaucourt'—who instantly pulled off his cap and stood bareheaded—'there are some spare pieces of wood lying by the cow-house, if you would have the kindness to have one laid across here I think it would be safer.' 'Ah, mon dieu sir,' said M.[101] Beaucourt, 'it must be iron. This is not a portion of the property where you would like to see wood.' 'But iron is so expensive,' said I, 'and it really is not worth while——' 'Sir, pardon me a thousand times,' said M. Beaucourt, 'it shall be iron. Assuredly and perfectly it shall be iron.' 'Then M. Beaucourt,' said I, 'I shall be glad to pay a moiety of the cost.' 'Sir,' said M. Beaucourt, 'Never!' Then to change the subject, he slided from his firmness and gravity into a graceful conversational tone, and said, 'In the moonlight last night, the flowers on the property appeared, O Heaven, to be bathing themselves in the sky. You like the property?' 'M. Beaucourt,' said I, 'I am enchanted with it; I am more than satisfied with everything.' 'And I sir,' said M. Beaucourt, laying his cap upon his breast, and kissing his hand—'I equally!' Yesterday two blacksmiths came for a day's work, and put up a good solid handsome bit of iron-railing, morticed into the stone parapet. . . . If the extraordinary things in the house defy description, the amazing phenomena in the gardens never could have been dreamed of by anybody but a Frenchman bent upon one idea. Besides a portrait of the house in the dining-room, there is a plan of the property in the hall. It looks about the size of Ireland; and to every one of the extraordinary objects, there is a reference with some portentous name. There are fifty-one such references, including the Cottage of Tom Thumb, the Bridge of Austerlitz, the Bridge of Jena, the Hermitage, the Bower of the Old Guard, the Labyrinth (I have no idea which is which); and there is guidance to every room in the house, as if it were a place on that stupendous[102] scale that without such a clue you must infallibly lose your way, and perhaps perish of starvation between bedroom and bedroom."[188]
Then came the charm of the letter, his description[100] of his landlord, lightly sketched by him in print as M. Loyal-Devasseur, but here filled in with the most attractive touches his loving hand could give. "But the landlord—M. Beaucourt—is wonderful. Everyone here has two surnames (I can’t imagine why), and M. Beaucourt, as he’s always called, is actually M. Beaucourt-Mutuel. He is a cheerful, portly guy with a friendly face; lives on the hill behind, just outside the top of the garden; used to be a linen draper in the town, where he still has a shop, but it’s rumored he has mortgaged his business and is facing difficulties—all because of this place, which he has planted with his own hands; which he cultivates all day; and which he never refers to as anything other than 'the Property.' He’s incredibly popular in Boulogne (people in the shops always brighten up when they hear his name and congratulate us on being his tenants), and honestly seems to deserve it. He’s such a generous guy that I feel bad asking him for anything since he immediately provides whatever it is. The things he’s done regarding unreasonable beds and washstands, I blush to think of. The other day in one of the side gardens—there are gardens on each side of the house too—I noticed a spot where I thought the "Comic Countryman" (a name he was just then calling his youngest boy) would surely trip and tumble down about a dozen feet. So I said, 'M. Beaucourt'—who quickly took off his hat and stood bareheaded—'there are some spare pieces of wood by the cow-house; if you could kindly lay one across here, I think it would be safer.' 'Ah, my dear sir,' said M. Beaucourt, 'it must be iron. This is not a part of the property where you’d want to see wood.' 'But iron is so expensive,' I said, 'and it really isn’t worth it——' 'Sir, pardon me a thousand times,' said M. Beaucourt, 'it shall be iron. Absolutely and completely, it shall be iron.' 'Then M. Beaucourt,' I said, 'I’d be happy to pay half the cost.' 'Sir,' said M. Beaucourt, 'Never!' Then, to change the subject, he shifted from his firmness and seriousness to a graceful conversational tone, and said, 'In the moonlight last night, the flowers on the property appeared, O Heaven, to be bathing themselves in the sky. Do you like the property?' 'M. Beaucourt,' I said, 'I’m thrilled with it; I’m more than satisfied with everything.' 'And I, sir,' said M. Beaucourt, laying his cap upon his chest and kissing his hand—'equally!' Yesterday two blacksmiths came for a day’s work and put up a nice solid piece of iron railing, mortised into the stone parapet. . . . If the extraordinary things in the house defy description, the amazing scenes in the gardens could only have been conceived by a Frenchman hell-bent on one idea. Besides a portrait of the house in the dining room, there’s a plan of the property in the hall. It looks about the size of Ireland; and for every one of the extraordinary objects, there’s a reference with some grand name. There are fifty-one such references, including the Cottage of Tom Thumb, the Bridge of Austerlitz, the Bridge of Jena, the Hermitage, the Bower of the Old Guard, the Labyrinth (I have no idea which is which); and there’s guidance to every room in the house, as if it were a place on that monumental[102] scale that without such a clue you would inevitably lose your way and perhaps starve between bedrooms."
On the 3rd of July there came a fresh trait of the good fellow of a landlord. "Fancy what Beaucourt told me last night. When he 'conceived the inspiration' of planting the property ten years ago, he went over to England to buy the trees, took a small cottage in the market-gardens at Putney, lived there three months, held a symposium every night attended by the principal gardeners of Fulham, Putney, Kew, and Hammersmith (which he calls Hamsterdam), and wound up with a supper at which the market-gardeners rose, clinked their glasses, and exclaimed with one accord (I quote him exactly) Vive Beaucourt! He was a captain in the National Guard, and Cavaignac his general. Brave Capitaine Beaucourt! said Cavaignac, you must receive a decoration. My General, said Beaucourt, No! It is enough for me that I have done my duty. I go to lay the first stone of a house upon a Property I have—that house shall be my decoration. (Regard that house!)" Addition to the picture came in a letter of[103] the 24th of July: with a droll glimpse of Shakespeare at the theatre, and of the Saturday's pig-market.
On July 3rd, a new side of our good landlord emerged. "Guess what Beaucourt told me last night. When he first got the idea to develop the property ten years ago, he went to England to buy trees, rented a small cottage in the market gardens at Putney, lived there for three months, and hosted a gathering every night with the main gardeners from Fulham, Putney, Kew, and Hammersmith—he calls Hammersmith 'Hamsterdam.' He wrapped it up with a dinner where the market gardeners stood up, clinked their glasses, and all shouted in unison (I’m quoting him exactly), Live Beaucourt! He was a captain in the National Guard, under General Cavaignac. 'Brave Captain Beaucourt!' Cavaignac said, 'You must receive a decoration.' 'My General,' Beaucourt replied, 'No! It's enough for me that I've done my duty. I'm going to lay the first stone of a house on my property—that house will be my decoration. (Look at that house!)'” Adding to the story, there was a letter from [103] dated July 24th, featuring a humorous glimpse of Shakespeare at the theatre and the Saturday pig market.
"I may mention that the great Beaucourt daily changes the orthography of this place. He has now fixed it, by having painted up outside the garden gate, 'Entrée particulière de la Villa des Moulineaux.' On another gate a little higher up, he has had painted 'Entrée des Ecuries de la Villa des Moulineaux.' On another gate a little lower down (applicable to one of the innumerable buildings in the garden), 'Entrée du Tom Pouce.' On the highest gate of the lot, leading to his own house, 'Entrée du Château Napoléonienne.' All of which inscriptions you will behold in black and white when you come. I see little of him now, as, all things being 'bien arrangées,' he is delicate of appearing. His wife has been making a trip in the country during the last three weeks, but (as he mentioned to me with his hat in his hand) it was necessary that he should remain here, to be continually at the disposition of the tenant of the Property. (The better to do this, he has had roaring dinner parties of fifteen daily; and the old woman who milks the cows has been fainting up the hill under vast burdens of champagne.)
"I should mention that the great Beaucourt is constantly changing the spelling of this place. He has now settled on it by having painted outside the garden gate, 'Private Entrance to the Villa des Moulineaux.' On another gate a little further up, he had 'Entrance to the Stables of the Villa des Moulineaux' painted. On another gate a little lower down (which refers to one of the numerous buildings in the garden), it says 'Entrance to Tom Pouce.' On the highest gate, leading to his own house, it says 'Entrance to Château Napoléonienne.' You will see all these signs in black and white when you come. I don’t see much of him now, as, everything being 'well arranged,' he is reluctant to appear. His wife has been away in the country for the last three weeks, but (as he told me with his hat in his hand) he needed to stay here to be at the disposal of the tenant of the property. (To manage this better, he has been throwing loud dinner parties of fifteen every day; and the old woman who milks the cows has been struggling up the hill under heavy loads of champagne.)"
"We went to the theatre last night, to see the Midsummer Night's Dream—of the Opera Comique. It is a beautiful little theatre now, with a very good company; and the nonsense of the piece was done with a sense quite confounding in that connexion. Willy Am Shay Kes Peer; Sirzhon Foll Stayffe; Lor Lattimeer; and that celebrated Maid of Honour to Queen Elizabeth, Meees Oleeveeir—were the principal characters.[104]
"We went to the theater last night to see A Midsummer Night's Dream at the Opera Comique. It's a beautiful little theater now, with a very talented cast; and the silliness of the play was performed with a surprisingly serious touch. Willy Am Shay Kes Peer; Sirzhon Foll Stayffe; Lor Lattimeer; and the famous Maid of Honour to Queen Elizabeth, Meees Oleeveeir—were the main characters.[104]
"Outside the old town, an army of workmen are (and have been for a week or so, already) employed upon an immense building which I supposed might be a Fort, or a Monastery, or a Barrack, or other something designed to last for ages. I find it is for the annual fair, which begins on the fifth of August and lasts a fortnight. Almost every Sunday we have a fête, where there is dancing in the open air, and where immense men with prodigious beards revolve on little wooden horses like Italian irons, in what we islanders call a roundabout, by the hour together. But really the good humour and cheerfulness are very delightful. Among the other sights of the place, there is a pig-market every Saturday, perfectly insupportable in its absurdity. An excited French peasant, male or female, with a determined young pig, is the most amazing spectacle. I saw a little Drama enacted yesterday week, the drollery of which was perfect. Dram. Pers. 1. A pretty young woman with short petticoats and trim blue stockings, riding a donkey with two baskets and a pig in each. 2. An ancient farmer in a blouse, driving four pigs, his four in hand, with an enormous whip—and being drawn against walls and into smoking shops by any one of the four. 3. A cart, with an old pig (manacled) looking out of it, and terrifying six hundred and fifty young pigs in the market by his terrific grunts. 4. Collector of Octroi in an immense cocked hat, with a stream of young pigs running, night and day, between his military boots and rendering accounts impossible. 5. Inimitable, confronted by a radiation of elderly pigs, fastened each by one leg to a bunch of stakes in the ground. 6. John Edmund Reade,[105] poet, expressing eternal devotion to and admiration of Landor, unconscious of approaching pig recently escaped from barrow. 7. Priests, peasants, soldiers, &c. &c."
"Outside the old town, a team of workers has been busy for about a week on a huge building that I thought might be a Fort, a Monastery, a Barrack, or something else meant to last for ages. I found out it’s for the annual fair, which kicks off on August 5th and runs for two weeks. Almost every Sunday, we have a celebration with dancing outdoors, where big men with huge beards go round and round on little wooden horses, what we islanders call a carousel, for hours on end. But honestly, the good mood and cheer are really nice. Among the other sights here, there’s a pig market every Saturday, and it’s completely ridiculous. An agitated French peasant, whether male or female, with a determined young pig, is quite the spectacle. I witnessed a little drama unfold last week, and it was hilarious. Dram. Pers. 1. A pretty young woman in short skirts and neat blue stockings, riding a donkey with two baskets and a pig in each. 2. An old farmer in a blouse, driving four pigs on a leash, using a gigantic whip—and being dragged against walls and into shops by one of the four. 3. A cart with an old pig (handcuffed) peering out, scaring six hundred and fifty young pigs in the market with its loud grunts. 4. A tax collector in a huge cocked hat, with a stream of young pigs running back and forth between his military boots, making accounts impossible. 5. Unmatched, faced with a bunch of older pigs, each tied by one leg to a set of stakes in the ground. 6. John Edmund Reade,[105] the poet, expressing his undying devotion to and admiration for Landor, oblivious to a nearby pig that just escaped from its pen. 7. Priests, peasants, soldiers, etc., etc."
He had meanwhile gathered friendly faces round him. Frank Stone went over with his family to a house taken for him on the St. Omer road by Dickens, who was joined in the chateau by Mr. and Mrs. Leech and Mr. Wilkie Collins. "Leech says that when he stepped from the boat after their stormy passage, he was received by the congregated spectators with a distinct round of applause as by far the most intensely and unutterably miserable looking object that had yet appeared. The laughter was tumultuous, and he wishes his friends to know that altogether he made an immense hit." So passed the summer months: excursions with these friends to Amiens and Beauvais relieving the work upon his novel, and the trip to Italy, already described, following on its completion.
He had gathered friendly faces around him. Frank Stone went over with his family to a house that Dickens had secured for him on the St. Omer road, where he was joined by Mr. and Mrs. Leech and Mr. Wilkie Collins. "Leech says that when he stepped off the boat after their rough journey, he was greeted by the crowd with a loud round of applause as the most miserable-looking person they had seen yet. The laughter was outrageous, and he wants his friends to know that overall, he made a huge impression." Thus, the summer months passed: outings with these friends to Amiens and Beauvais broke up the work on his novel, followed by the trip to Italy, which has already been described, after he finished it.
In June, 1854, M. Beaucourt had again received his famous tenant, but in another cottage or chateau (to him convertible terms) on the much cherished property, placed on the very summit of the hill with a private road leading out to the Column, a really pretty place, rooms larger than in the other house, a noble sea view, everywhere nice prospects, good garden, and plenty of sloping turf.[189] It was called the Villa du[106] Camp de Droite, and here Dickens stayed, as I have intimated, until the eve of his winter residence in Paris.
In June 1854, M. Beaucourt welcomed his famous tenant again, but this time to a different cottage or chateau (which he considered the same) on his beloved property. It was located at the top of the hill with a private road leading to the Column, a truly beautiful spot, with larger rooms than in the other house, a stunning sea view, lovely scenery everywhere, a nice garden, and plenty of sloping grass. It was called the Villa du Camp de Droite, and as I mentioned, Dickens stayed here until just before he moved to Paris for the winter.
The formation of the Northern Camp at Boulogne began the week after he had finished Hard Times, and he watched its progress, as it increased and extended itself along the cliffs towards Calais, with the liveliest amusement. At first he was startled by the suddenness with which soldiers overran the roads, became billeted in every house, made the bridges red with their trowsers, and "sprang upon the pier like fantastic mustard and cress when boats were expected, many of them never having seen the sea before." But the good behaviour of the men had a reconciling effect, and their ingenuity delighted him. The quickness with which they raised whole streets of mud-huts, less picturesque than the tents,[190] but (like most unpicturesque things) more comfortable, was like an Arabian Nights' tale. "Each little street holds 144 men, and every corner-door has the number of the street upon it as soon as it is put up; and the postmen can fall to work as easily as in the Rue de Rivoli at Paris." His patience was again a little tried when he found baggage-wagons ploughing up his favourite walks, and trumpeters in twos and threes teaching newly-recruited trumpeters in all the sylvan places, and making the echoes hideous.[107] But this had its amusement too. "I met to-day a weazen sun-burnt youth from the south with such an immense regimental shako on, that he looked like a sort of lucifer match-box, evidently blowing his life rapidly out, under the auspices of two magnificent creatures all hair and lungs, of such breadth across the shoulders that I couldn't see their breast-buttons when I stood in front of them."
The setup of the Northern Camp at Boulogne started the week after he wrapped up Hard Times, and he watched with great amusement as it expanded along the cliffs toward Calais. At first, he was taken aback by how quickly soldiers took over the roads, settled into every house, made the bridges red with their trousers, and "jumped onto the pier like wild mustard and cress when boats were expected, many of them never having seen the sea before." But the soldiers' good behavior was reassuring, and their creativity impressed him. The speed at which they constructed entire streets of mud huts, not as picturesque as tents,[190] but (like most unpicturesque things) more comfortable, was like something out of an Arabian Nights' story. "Each little street holds 144 men, and every corner door has the street number on it as soon as it's put up; and the mailmen can get to work just as easily as in Rue de Rivoli in Paris." His patience was tested again when he discovered baggage wagons driving through his favorite paths, and trumpeters practicing in pairs and threes in all the wooded areas, making the echoes atrocious.[107] But there was humor in that too. "Today, I ran into a scraggly sunburned young guy from the south wearing such a huge regimental hat that he looked like a kind of matchbox, clearly blowing his life away with the help of two impressive creatures with all hair and lungs, so broad across the shoulders that I couldn’t see their breast buttons when I stood in front of them."
The interest culminated as the visit of the Prince Consort approached with its attendant glories of illuminations and reviews. Beaucourt's excitement became intense. The Villa du Camp de Droite was to be a blaze of triumph on the night of the arrival; Dickens, who had carried over with him the meteor flag of England and set it streaming over a haystack in his field,[191] now hoisted the French colours over the British Jack in honour of the national alliance; the Emperor was to subside to the station of a general officer, so that all the rejoicings should be in honour of the Prince; and there was to be a review in the open country near Wimereux, when "at one stage of the maneuvres (I am too excited to spell the word but you know what I mean)" the whole hundred thousand men in the camp of the North were to be placed before the Prince's eyes, to show him what a division of the French army might be. "I believe everything I hear," said Dickens. It was the state of mind of Hood's country gentleman after the fire at the Houses of Parliament. "Beaucourt, as one of the town council, receives summonses[108] to turn out and debate about something, or receive somebody, every five minutes. Whenever I look out of window, or go to the door, I see an immense black object at Beaucourt's porch like a boat set up on end in the air with a pair of white trowsers below it. This is the cocked hat of an official Huissier, newly arrived with a summons, whose head is thrown back as he is in the act of drinking Beaucourt's wine." The day came at last, and all Boulogne turned out for its holiday; "but I" Dickens wrote, "had by this cooled down a little, and, reserving myself for the illuminations, I abandoned the great men and set off upon my usual country walk. See my reward. Coming home by the Calais road, covered with dust, I suddenly find myself face to face with Albert and Napoleon, jogging along in the pleasantest way, a little in front, talking extremely loud about the view, and attended by a brilliant staff of some sixty or seventy horsemen, with a couple of our royal grooms with their red coats riding oddly enough in the midst of the magnates. I took off my wide-awake without stopping to stare, whereupon the Emperor pulled off his cocked hat; and Albert (seeing, I suppose, that it was an Englishman) pulled off his. Then we went our several ways. The Emperor is broader across the chest than in the old times when we used to see him so often at Gore-house, and stoops more in the shoulders. Indeed his carriage thereabouts is like Fonblanque's."[192] The town he described as[109] "one great flag" for the rest of the visit; and to the success of the illuminations he contributed largely himself by leading off splendidly with a hundred and twenty wax candles blazing in his seventeen front windows, and visible from that great height over all the place. "On the first eruption Beaucourt danced and screamed on the grass before the door; and when he was more composed, set off with Madame Beaucourt to look at the house from every possible quarter, and, he said, collect the suffrages of his compatriots."
The excitement peaked as the Prince Consort's visit drew near, bringing with it all the glory of lights and parades. Beaucourt's enthusiasm became overwhelming. The Villa du Camp de Droite was set to shine like a celebration on the night of the arrival; Dickens, who had brought the meteor flag of England and had it flying over a haystack in his field,[191] now raised the French colors over the British Jack to honor the national alliance; the Emperor was going to step back to the role of a general so that all the celebrations would be for the Prince; and there was to be a review in the countryside near Wimereux, when "at one point in the maneuvers (I'm too excited to spell that word, but you know what I mean)" all the hundred thousand soldiers in the Northern camp would parade before the Prince to show him what a division of the French army could look like. "I believe everything I hear," Dickens said. It was reminiscent of Hood's country gentleman after the fire at the Houses of Parliament. "Beaucourt, as a member of the town council, gets summoned[108] to meet and discuss something or welcome someone every few minutes. Whenever I look out the window or step to the door, I see a huge black figure at Beaucourt's porch like a boat standing on end in the air with a pair of white trousers below it. That's the cocked hat of a newly arrived official Huissier with a summons, his head tilted back as he drinks Beaucourt's wine." Finally, the day arrived, and all of Boulogne came out to celebrate; "but I," Dickens wrote, "had cooled down a bit, and saving myself for the lights, left the big shots and went for my usual country walk. See my reward. On the way home by the Calais road, covered in dust, I suddenly found myself face to face with Albert and Napoleon, casually making their way ahead, loudly discussing the view and flanked by a dazzling entourage of about sixty or seventy horsemen, along with a couple of our royal grooms in their red coats oddly riding amidst the dignitaries. I took off my wide-brimmed hat without pausing to stare, to which the Emperor lifted his cocked hat; and Albert (I suppose noticing I was English) removed his as well. Then we went our separate ways. The Emperor is broader across the chest than he used to be back when we saw him often at Gore-house, and he has more of a stoop in his shoulders. Indeed, his body language is reminiscent of Fonblanque's."[192] He described the town as[109] "one big flag" for the remainder of the visit; and he personally contributed significantly to the success of the illuminations by brilliantly leading off with a hundred and twenty wax candles blazing in his seventeen front windows, visible from that great height all over the area. "At the first eruption, Beaucourt danced and screamed on the grass in front of the door; and when he was more composed, he set off with Madame Beaucourt to view the house from every conceivable angle and, he said, to gather the opinions of his fellow citizens."
Their suffrages seem to have gone, however, mainly in another direction. "It was wonderful," Dickens wrote, "to behold about the streets the small French soldiers of the line seizing our Guards by the hand and embracing them. It was wonderful, too, to behold the English sailors in the town, shaking hands with everybody and generally patronizing everything. When the people could not get hold of either a soldier or a sailor, they rejoiced in the royal grooms, and embraced them. I don't think the Boulogne people were surprised by anything so much, as by the three cheers the crew of the yacht gave when the Emperor went aboard to lunch. The prodigious volume of them, and the precision, and the circumstance that no man was left straggling on his own account either before or afterwards, seemed to strike the general mind with amazement. Beaucourt said it was like boxing." That was written on the 10th of September; but in a very[110] few days Dickens was unwillingly convinced that whatever the friendly disposition to England might be, the war with Russia was decidedly unpopular. He was present when the false report of the taking of Sebastopol reached the Emperor and Empress. "I was at the Review" (8th of October) "yesterday week, very near the Emperor and Empress, when the taking of Sebastopol was announced. It was a magnificent show on a magnificent day; and if any circumstance could make it special, the arrival of the telegraphic despatch would be the culminating point one might suppose. It quite disturbed and mortified me to find how faintly, feebly, miserably, the men responded to the call of the officers to cheer, as each regiment passed by. Fifty excited Englishmen would make a greater sign and sound than a thousand of these men do. . . . The Empress was very pretty, and her slight figure sat capitally on her grey horse. When the Emperor gave her the despatch to read, she flushed and fired up in a very pleasant way, and kissed it with as natural an impulse as one could desire to see."
Their votes, however, seemed to have mostly gone in another direction. "It was incredible," Dickens wrote, "to see the small French soldiers shaking hands with our Guards and embracing them. It was also amazing to see the English sailors in the town, greeting everyone and generally acting superior. When the people couldn’t find a soldier or a sailor, they celebrated the royal grooms and hugged them. I don't think the people of Boulogne were as surprised by anything as they were by the three cheers the crew of the yacht gave when the Emperor went aboard for lunch. The sheer volume of cheers, the precision of it, and the fact that no one was left behind either before or after seemed to astonish everyone. Beaucourt said it was like boxing." That was written on September 10; but just a few[110] days later, Dickens reluctantly realized that whatever the friendly attitude toward England might be, the war with Russia was definitely unpopular. He was present when the false report of the capture of Sebastopol reached the Emperor and Empress. "I was at the Review" (October 8) "last week, very close to the Emperor and Empress, when the capture of Sebastopol was announced. It was a magnificent spectacle on a beautiful day; and if any event could make it special, the arrival of the telegram would be the peak one might expect. It truly disturbed and upset me to see how faintly, feebly, and miserably the men responded to the officers’ call to cheer as each regiment passed by. Fifty excited Englishmen would make a greater noise and show than a thousand of these men would. . . . The Empress was very attractive, and her slight figure looked fantastic on her grey horse. When the Emperor handed her the telegram to read, she flushed and brightened up in a very delightful way, and kissed it with as natural an impulse as one could hope to see."
On the night of that day Dickens went up to see a play acted at a café at the camp, and found himself one of an audience composed wholly of officers and men, with only four ladies among them, officers' wives. The steady, working, sensible faces all about him told their own story; "and as to kindness and consideration towards the poor actors, it was real benevolence." Another attraction at the camp was a conjuror, who had been called to exhibit twice before the imperial party, and whom Dickens always afterwards referred to as the most consummate master of legerdemain he had[111] seen. Nor was he a mean authority as to this, being himself, with his tools at hand, a capital conjuror;[112][193] but the Frenchman scorned help, stood among the company without any sort of apparatus, and, by the mere force of sleight of hand and an astonishing memory, performed feats having no likeness to anything Dickens had ever seen done, and totally inexplicable to his most vigilant reflection. "So far as I know, a perfectly original genius, and that puts any sort of knowledge of legerdemain, such as I supposed that I possessed, at utter defiance." The account he gave dealt with two exploits only, the easiest to describe, and, not being with cards, not the most remarkable; for he would also say of this Frenchman that he transformed cards into very demons. He never saw a human hand touch them in the same way, fling them about so amazingly, or change them in his, one's own, or another's hand, with a skill so impossible to follow.
On that night, Dickens went to see a play performed at a café in the camp and found himself among an audience made up entirely of officers and soldiers, with just four ladies present, who were officers' wives. The serious, hardworking faces surrounding him told their own story; "and regarding kindness and consideration towards the struggling actors, it was genuine goodwill." Another attraction at the camp was a magician who had performed twice before the imperial party and whom Dickens later described as the most skilled master of sleight-of-hand he had ever seen. He was no lightweight when it came to this, as he himself was a great magician when equipped with his tools; however, the Frenchman relied solely on his skills, stood among the crowd without any equipment, and, through pure sleight of hand and an incredible memory, performed tricks unlike anything Dickens had ever witnessed, completely beyond his most attentive scrutiny. "As far as I can tell, he is a completely original genius, and that completely challenges any notion I had of my own knowledge of sleight-of-hand." The account he gave focused on just two tricks, the easiest to explain and, since they didn't involve cards, not the most impressive; for he would also say of this Frenchman that he could turn cards into real devils. He had never seen anyone handle them like that, throw them around so astonishingly, or change them in his hands, or in someone else's hands, with such skill that it was impossible to follow.
"You are to observe that he was with the company, not in the least removed from them; and that we occupied the front row. He brought in some writing paper with him when he entered, and a black-lead pencil;[113] and he wrote some words on half-sheets of paper. One of these half-sheets he folded into two, and gave to Catherine to hold. Madame, he says aloud, will you think of any class of objects? I have done so.—Of what class, Madame? Animals.—Will you think of a particular animal, Madame? I have done so.—Of what animal? The Lion.—Will you think of another class of objects, Madame? I have done so.—Of what class? Flowers.—The particular flower? The Rose.—Will you open the paper you hold in your hand? She opened it, and there was neatly and plainly written in pencil—The Lion. The Rose. Nothing whatever had led up to these words, and they were the most distant conceivable from Catherine's thoughts when she entered the room. He had several common school-slates about a foot square. He took one of these to a field-officer from the camp, decoré and what not, who sat about six from us, with a grave saturnine friend next him. My General, says he, will you write a name on this slate, after your friend has done so? Don't show it to me. The friend wrote a name, and the General wrote a name. The conjuror took the slate rapidly from the officer, threw it violently down on the ground with its written side to the floor, and asked the officer to put his foot upon it and keep it there: which he did. The conjuror considered for about a minute, looking devilish hard at the General.—My General, says he, your friend wrote Dagobert, upon the slate under your foot. The friend admits it.—And you, my General, wrote Nicholas. General admits it, and everybody laughs and applauds.—My General, will you excuse me, if I change that name into a name expressive[114] of the power of a great nation, which, in happy alliance with the gallantry and spirit of France will shake that name to its centre? Certainly I will excuse it.—My General, take up the slate and read. General reads: Dagobert, Victoria. The first in his friend's writing; the second in a new hand. I never saw anything in the least like this; or at all approaching to the absolute certainty, the familiarity, quickness, absence of all machinery, and actual face-to-face, hand-to-hand fairness between the conjuror and the audience, with which it was done. I have not the slightest idea of the secret.—One more. He was blinded with several table napkins, and then a great cloth was bodily thrown over them and his head too, so that his voice sounded as if he were under a bed. Perhaps half a dozen dates were written on a slate. He takes the slate in his hand, and throws it violently down on the floor as before, remains silent a minute, seems to become agitated, and bursts out thus: 'What is this I see? A great city, but of narrow streets and old-fashioned houses, many of which are of wood, resolving itself into ruins! How is it falling into ruins? Hark! I hear the crackling of a great conflagration, and, looking up, I behold a vast cloud of flame and smoke. The ground is covered with hot cinders too, and people are flying into the fields and endeavouring to save their goods. This great fire, this great wind, this roaring noise! This is the great fire of London, and the first date upon the slate must be one, six, six, six—the year in which it happened!' And so on with all the other dates. There! Now, if you will take a cab and impart these mysteries to Rogers, I shall be very glad to have his[115] opinion of them." Rogers had taxed our credulity with some wonderful clairvoyant experiences of his own in Paris to which here was a parallel at last!
"You should notice that he was with the group, not at all separate from them; and we were seated in the front row. He came in with some writing paper and a black pencil;[113] he scribbled some words on half sheets of paper. One of these sheets he folded in half and handed to Catherine to hold. Madame, he asks loudly, will you think of any category of things? I have done so.—Of what category, Madame? Animals.—Will you think of a specific animal, Madame? I have done so.—Of what animal? The Lion.—Will you think of another category of things, Madame? I have done so.—Of what category? Flowers.—The specific flower? The Rose.— Will you open the paper you’re holding? She opened it, and there was neatly and clearly written in pencil—The Lion. The Rose. There was no context leading up to these words, and they were completely unrelated to Catherine's thoughts when she came into the room. He had several standard school slates about a foot square. He took one to a field officer from the camp, who sat about six seats away from us, with a serious, gloomy friend next to him. My General, he says, will you write a name on this slate, after your friend has done so? Don’t show it to me. The friend wrote a name, and the General wrote a name. The magician quickly took the slate from the officer, slammed it down on the ground with the written side facing the floor, and asked the officer to put his foot on it and keep it there: which he did. The magician pondered for about a minute, looking intensely at the General.—My General, he says, your friend wrote Dagobert on the slate under your foot. The friend confirms it.—And you, my General, wrote Nicholas. The General agrees, and everyone laughs and applauds.—My General, will you forgive me if I change that name to one that reflects[114] the power of a great nation, which, in a happy alliance with the bravery and spirit of France, will shake that name to its core? Of course, I’ll forgive it.—My General, please pick up the slate and read. The General reads: Dagobert, Victoria. The first in his friend’s writing; the second in a different hand. I’ve never seen anything remotely like this; or anything that even comes close to the absolute certainty, familiarity, speed, lack of any tricks, and the actual face-to-face, hand-to-hand fairness between the magician and the audience, with which it was done. I have no idea what the secret is.—One more. He was blindfolded with several table napkins, and then a large cloth was thrown over him and his head as well, making his voice sound as if he were under a bed. Perhaps half a dozen dates were written on a slate. He took the slate in his hand, and slammed it down on the floor again, remained silent for a minute, seemed to get agitated, and exclaimed: 'What is this I see? A great city, but with narrow streets and old-fashioned houses, many of which are made of wood, falling into ruins! How is it falling apart? Listen! I hear the crackling of a large fire, and looking up, I see a huge cloud of flames and smoke. The ground is covered with hot embers too, and people are running into the fields trying to save their belongings. This massive fire, this strong wind, this roaring noise! This is the great fire of London, and the first date on the slate must be one, six, six, six—the year in which it happened!' And so on with all the other dates. There! Now, if you could take a cab and share these mysteries with Rogers, I would love to hear what he thinks of them." Rogers had tested our credulity with some incredible clairvoyant stories of his own from Paris, which finally have a parallel here!
When leaving Paris for his third visit to Boulogne, at the beginning of June 1856, he had not written a word of the ninth number of his new book, and did not expect for another month to "see land from the running sea of Little Dorrit." He had resumed the house he first occupied, the cottage or villa "des Moulineaux," and after dawdling about his garden for a few days with surprising industry in a French farmer garb of blue blouse, leathern belt, and military cap, which he had mounted as "the only one for complete comfort," he wrote to me that he was getting "Now to work again—to work! The story lies before me, I hope, strong and clear. Not to be easily told; but nothing of that sort is to be easily done that I know of." At work it became his habit to sit late, and then, putting off his usual walk until night, to lie down among the roses reading until after tea ("middle-aged Love in a blouse and belt"), when he went down to the pier. "The said pier at evening is a phase of the place we never see, and which I hardly knew. But I never did behold such specimens of the youth of my country, male and female, as pervade that place. They are really, in their vulgarity and insolence, quite disheartening. One is so fearfully ashamed of them, and they contrast so very unfavourably with the natives." Mr. Wilkie Collins was again his companion in the summer weeks, and the presence of Jerrold for the greater part of the time added much to his enjoyment.
When he left Paris for his third trip to Boulogne at the beginning of June 1856, he hadn't written a single word of the ninth installment of his new book and didn't expect to "see land from the running sea of Little Dorrit" for another month. He returned to the house he first lived in, the cottage or villa "des Moulineaux," and after spending a few days industriously tending to his garden in a French farmer outfit of a blue blouse, leather belt, and military cap— which he claimed was "the only one for complete comfort"— he wrote to me that he was getting "Now to work again—to work! The story lies before me, I hope, strong and clear. It won't be easy to tell; but I know nothing of that sort is easy to do." While working, he developed the habit of staying up late and then, delaying his usual walk until night, he would lie down among the roses reading until after tea ("middle-aged Love in a blouse and belt"), at which point he would head down to the pier. "The pier at evening is a part of the place we never see, and which I hardly knew. But I’ve never seen such examples of the youth of my country, both male and female, as crowd that place. They are really, in their vulgarity and arrogance, quite disheartening. One feels so embarrassingly ashamed of them, and they contrast so very unfavorably with the locals." Mr. Wilkie Collins was again his companion during the summer weeks, and Jerrold's presence for most of the time greatly enhanced his enjoyment.
The last of the camp was now at hand. It had only[116] a battalion of men in it, and a few days would see them out. At first there was horrible weather, "storms of wind, rushes of rain, heavy squalls, cold airs, sea fogs, banging shutters, flapping doors, and beaten down rose-trees by the hundred; but then came a delightful week among the corn fields and bean fields, and afterwards the end. It looks very singular and very miserable. The soil being sand, and the grass having been trodden away these two years, the wind from the sea carries the sand into the chinks and ledges of all the doors and windows, and chokes them;—just as if they belonged to Arab huts in the desert. A number of the non-commissioned officers made turf-couches outside their huts, and there were turf orchestras for the bands to play in; all of which are fast getting sanded over in a most Egyptian manner. The Fair is on, under the walls of the haute ville over the way. At one popular show, the Malakhoff is taken every half-hour between 4 and 11. Bouncing explosions announce every triumph of the French arms (the English have nothing to do with it); and in the intervals a man outside blows a railway whistle—straight into the dining-room. Do you know that the French soldiers call the English medal 'The Salvage Medal'—meaning that they got it for saving the English army? I don't suppose there are a thousand people in all France who believe that we did anything but get rescued by the French. And I am confident that the no-result of our precious Chelsea enquiry has wonderfully strengthened this conviction. Nobody at home has yet any adequate idea, I am deplorably sure, of what the Barnacles and the Circumlocution Office have done for us. But[117] whenever we get into war again, the people will begin to find out."
The camp's final days were upon us. It had only[116] a battalion of soldiers left, and they would be gone in a few days. At first, the weather was terrible—strong winds, heavy rain, freezing temperatures, thick sea fog, banging shutters, flapping doors, and countless beaten-down rose bushes; but then we enjoyed a lovely week among the corn and bean fields, followed by the end. It looks really strange and quite miserable. The soil is sandy, and with the grass trampled down for the past two years, the sea wind blows sand into the cracks and edges of all the doors and windows, clogging them up—just like they belong to desert huts in Arabia. Some of the non-commissioned officers made turf couches outside their huts, and there were turf orchestras where the bands could play; all of which are quickly getting covered in sand in a very Egyptian way. The Fair is happening, just below the walls of the haute ville across the street. At one popular attraction, they recreate the Malakhoff every half-hour between 4 and 11. Loud explosions signal each success of the French army (the English aren't involved), and in the pauses, a guy outside blows a train whistle—right into the dining room. Did you know that French soldiers refer to the English medal as 'The Salvage Medal,' meaning they earned it for saving the English army? I don't think there are a thousand people in all of France who believe we did anything but get rescued by them. And I'm pretty sure that the useless results of our Chelsea inquiry have only reinforced this idea. Nobody back home has any real understanding, I sadly believe, of what the Barnacles and the Circumlocution Office have done for us. But[117] when we go to war again, people will start to figure it out.
His own household had got into a small war already, of which the commander-in-chief was his man-servant "French," the bulk of the forces engaged being his children, and the invaders two cats. Business brought him to London on the hostilities breaking out, and on his return after a few days the story of the war was told. "Dick," it should be said, was a canary very dear both to Dickens and his eldest daughter, who had so tamed to her loving hand its wild little heart that it was become the most docile of companions.[194] "The only thing new in this garden is that war is raging against two particularly tigerish and fearful cats (from the mill, I suppose), which are always glaring in dark corners, after our wonderful little Dick. Keeping the house open at all points, it is impossible to shut them out, and they hide themselves in the most terrific manner: hanging themselves up behind draperies, like bats, and tumbling out in the dead of night with frightful caterwaulings. Hereupon, French borrows Beaucourt's gun, loads the same to the muzzle, discharges it twice in vain and throws himself over with the recoil, exactly like a clown. But at last (while I was in town) he aims at the more amiable cat of the two, and shoots that animal dead. Insufferably elated by this victory, he is now engaged from morning to night in hiding behind bushes to get aim at the other. He does nothing else whatever. All the boys encourage him and watch for[118] the enemy—on whose appearance they give an alarm which immediately serves as a warning to the creature, who runs away. They are at this moment (ready dressed for church) all lying on their stomachs in various parts of the garden. Horrible whistles give notice to the gun what point it is to approach. I am afraid to go out, lest I should be shot. Mr. Plornish says his prayers at night in a whisper, lest the cat should overhear him and take offence. The tradesmen cry out as they come up the avenue, 'Me voici! C'est moi—boulanger—ne tirez pas, Monsieur Franche!' It is like living in a state of siege; and the wonderful manner in which the cat preserves the character of being the only person not much put out by the intensity of this monomania, is most ridiculous." (6th of July.) . . . "About four pounds of powder and half a ton of shot have been (13th of July) fired off at the cat (and the public in general) during the week. The finest thing is that immediately after I have heard the noble sportsman blazing away at her in the garden in front, I look out of my room door into the drawing-room, and am pretty sure to see her coming in after the birds, in the calmest manner, by the back window. Intelligence has been brought to me from a source on which I can rely, that French has newly conceived the atrocious project of tempting her into the coach-house by meat and kindness, and there, from an elevated portmanteau, blowing her head off. This I mean sternly to interdict, and to do so to-day as a work of piety."
His household had already descended into a little war, with his butler, "French," as the commander. The main troops involved were his children, and the enemies were two cats. Business took him to London just as the conflict began, and when he returned a few days later, the tale of the war was shared. "Dick," who should be noted, was a canary that was very cherished by both Dickens and his eldest daughter, who had so lovingly tamed its wild little heart that it became the most obedient companion. [194] "The only new thing in this garden is that a war is being waged against two particularly fierce and scary cats (probably from the mill), which are always lurking in dark corners, stalking our wonderful little Dick. With the house open at all points, it's impossible to keep them out, and they hide out in the most terrifying ways: hanging behind drapes like bats and suddenly dropping down in the dead of night with awful howling. In response, French borrows Beaucourt's gun, loads it fully, fires it twice without success, and ends up tumbling over from the recoil, exactly like a clown. But finally (while I was in town), he aims at the more friendly of the two cats and shoots it dead. Overjoyed by this victory, he now spends all day hiding behind bushes to get a shot at the other. That’s all he does. All the boys cheer him on and keep an eye out for the enemy—when they spot it, they raise the alarm, which serves as a warning for the cat to take off. Right now (dressed for church), they are all lying flat in various spots in the garden. Terrible whistles signal to the gun where to aim. I’m scared to go outside for fear of being shot. Mr. Plornish whispers his prayers at night, hoping the cat won't overhear and get upset. The tradesmen shout as they walk up the path, 'Here I am! It’s me—baker—don’t shoot, Mr. French!' It feels like living under siege; and the ridiculous way the cat manages to keep its cool amid this obsession is just too funny." (6th of July.) . . . "About four pounds of gunpowder and half a ton of shot have been (13th of July) fired off at the cat (and the public in general) over the past week. The funniest part is that right after I hear the noble hunter shooting at her in the front garden, I look out of my room door into the drawing room and almost always catch her coming in after the birds, completely unfazed, through the back window. I've received reliable information that French has recently devised the horrible plan of luring her into the coach house with food and kindness, and then, from an elevated suitcase, blowing her head off. I sternly intend to put a stop to this, and I plan to do it today as a good deed."
Besides the graver work which Mr. Wilkie Collins and himself were busy with, in these months, and by which Household Words mainly was to profit, some[119] lighter matters occupied the leisure of both. There were to be, at Christmas, theatricals again at Tavistock House; in which the children, with the help of their father and other friends, were to follow up the success of the Lighthouse by again acquitting themselves as grown-up actors; and Mr. Collins was busy preparing for them a new drama to be called The Frozen Deep, while Dickens was sketching a farce for Mr. Lemon to fill in. But this pleasant employment had sudden and sad interruption.
Besides the serious work that Mr. Wilkie Collins and he were focused on during these months, which was mainly meant to benefit Household Words, both also spent their free time on lighter matters. They were set to have theatricals again at Tavistock House for Christmas; the children, with help from their father and other friends, were going to build on the success of the Lighthouse by performing as adult actors once more. Mr. Collins was busy creating a new play titled The Frozen Deep, while Dickens was drafting a farce for Mr. Lemon to fill in. However, this enjoyable activity was suddenly and sadly interrupted.
An epidemic broke out in the town, affecting the children of several families known to Dickens, among them that of his friend Mr. Gilbert A'Becket; who, upon arriving from Paris, and finding a favourite little son stricken dangerously, sank himself under an illness from which he had been suffering, and died two days after the boy. "He had for three days shown symptoms of rallying, and we had some hope of his recovery; but he sank and died, and never even knew that the child had gone before him. A sad, sad story." Dickens meanwhile had sent his own children home with his wife, and the rest soon followed. Poor M. Beaucourt was inconsolable. "The desolation of the place is wretched. When Mamey and Katey went, Beaucourt came in and wept. He really is almost broken-hearted about it. He had planted all manner of flowers for next month, and has thrown down the spade and left off weeding the garden, so that it looks something like a dreary bird-cage with all manner of grasses and chickweeds sticking through the bars and lying in the sand. 'Such a loss too,' he says, 'for Monsieur Dickens!' Then he looks in at the kitchen[120] window (which seems to be his only relief), and sighs himself up the hill home."[195]
An outbreak occurred in the town, impacting the children of several families known to Dickens, including his friend Mr. Gilbert A'Becket. After arriving from Paris and finding his beloved young son gravely ill, he himself succumbed to an illness he’d been battling and passed away two days after the boy. "For three days, he showed signs of improving, and we had some hope for his recovery; but he fell back and died, never even knowing that the child had left this world first. Such a tragic story." Meanwhile, Dickens had sent his own children home with his wife, and the rest soon followed. Poor M. Beaucourt was heartbroken. "The emptiness of the place is terrible. When Mamey and Katey left, Beaucourt came in and cried. He’s truly almost crushed by it. He had planted all kinds of flowers for next month, and now he's thrown down the spade and stopped weeding the garden, making it look like a sad birdcage with all sorts of grasses and chickweeds growing through the bars and scattered in the sand. 'What a loss too,' he says, 'for Monsieur Dickens!' Then he looks in at the kitchen[120] window (which seems to be his only comfort), and sighs as he makes his way home up the hill."[195]
The interval of residence in Paris between these two last visits to Boulogne is now to be described.
The time spent living in Paris between these last two visits to Boulogne will now be described.
CHAPTER V.
RESIDENCE IN PARIS.
1855-1856.
In Paris Dickens's life was passed among artists, and in the exercise of his own art. His associates were writers, painters, actors, or musicians, and when he wanted relief from any strain of work he found it at the theatre. The years since his last residence in the great city had made him better known, and the increased attentions pleased him. He had to help in preparing for a translation of his books into French; and this, with continued labour at the story he had in hand, occupied him as long as he remained. It will be all best told by extracts from his letters; in which the[122] people he met, the theatres he visited, and the incidents, public or private, that seemed to him worthy of mention, reappear with the old force and liveliness.
In Paris, Dickens spent his time among artists and practicing his own craft. His friends included writers, painters, actors, and musicians, and whenever he needed a break from his work, he found it at the theater. The years since his last stay in the city had made him more well-known, and the extra attention he received pleased him. He had to assist in preparing a translation of his books into French; this, along with his ongoing work on the story he was writing, kept him occupied for the duration of his stay. The best details will come from excerpts of his letters, where the[122] people he met, the theaters he attended, and the events, both public and private, that he found noteworthy, are recounted with the same vibrant energy as before.
Nor is anything better worth preserving from them than choice bits of description of an actor or a drama, for this perishable enjoyment has only so much as may survive out of such recollections to witness for itself to another generation; and an unusually high place may be challenged for the subtlety and delicacy of what is said in these letters of things theatrical, when the writer was especially attracted by a performer or a play. Frédéric Lemaitre has never had a higher tribute than Dickens paid to him during his few days' earlier stay at Paris in the spring.
There's nothing better to take away from them than some selected descriptions of an actor or a play, since this fleeting enjoyment only leaves behind a limited amount of memories to speak for itself to another generation. The subtlety and nuance in these letters about theater can truly stand out, especially when the writer was particularly drawn to a performer or a production. Frédéric Lemaitre has never received a greater honor than the one Dickens gave him during his brief earlier visit to Paris in the spring.
"Incomparably the finest acting I ever saw, I saw last night at the Ambigu. They have revived that old piece, once immensely popular in London under the name of Thirty Years of a Gambler's Life. Old Lemaitre plays his famous character,[196] and never did I see anything, in art, so exaltedly horrible and awful. In the earlier acts he was so well made up, and so light and active, that he really looked sufficiently young. But in the last two, when he had grown old and miserable, he did the finest things, I really believe, that are within the power of acting. Two or three times, a great cry of horror went all round the house. When he met, in the inn yard, the traveller whom he murders, and first saw his money, the manner in which the crime[123] came into his head—and eyes—was as truthful as it was terrific. This traveller, being a good fellow, gives him wine. You should see the dim remembrance of his better days that comes over him as he takes the glass, and in a strange dazed way makes as if he were going to touch the other man's, or do some airy thing with it; and then stops and flings the contents down his hot throat, as if he were pouring it into a lime-kiln. But this was nothing to what follows after he has done the murder, and comes home, with a basket of provisions, a ragged pocket full of money, and a badly-washed bloody right hand—which his little girl finds out. After the child asked him if he had hurt his hand, his going aside, turning himself round, and looking over all his clothes for spots, was so inexpressibly dreadful that it really scared one. He called for wine, and the sickness that came upon him when he saw the colour, was one of the things that brought out the curious cry I have spoken of, from the audience. Then he fell into a sort of bloody mist, and went on to the end groping about, with no mind for anything, except making his fortune by staking this money, and a faint dull kind of love for the child. It is quite impossible to satisfy one's-self by saying enough of such a magnificent performance. I have never seen him come near its finest points, in anything else. He said two things in a way that alone would put him far apart from all other actors. One to his wife, when he has exultingly shewn her the money and she has asked him how he got it—'I found it'—and the other to his old companion and tempter, when he charged him with having killed that traveller, and he suddenly went headlong mad and took him by[124] the throat and howled out, 'It wasn't I who murdered him—it was Misery!' And such a dress; such a face; and, above all, such an extraordinary guilty wicked thing as he made of a knotted branch of a tree which was his walking-stick, from the moment when the idea of the murder came into his head! I could write pages about him. It is an impression quite ineffaceable. He got half-boastful of that walking-staff to himself, and half-afraid of it; and didn't know whether to be grimly pleased that it had the jagged end, or to hate it and be horrified at it. He sat at a little table in the inn-yard, drinking with the traveller; and this horrible stick got between them like the Devil, while he counted on his fingers the uses he could put the money to."
"Incomparably the best acting I've ever seen was last night at the Ambigu. They’ve brought back that old play, once hugely popular in London called Thirty Years of a Gambler's Life. Old Lemaitre plays his iconic character, and I’ve never seen anything in art so intensely horrifying. In the earlier acts, he was so well made up and so light and active that he actually looked young enough. But in the last two acts, when he became old and miserable, he delivered some of the finest moments that acting can offer. A couple of times, a gasp of horror went through the audience. When he encountered the traveler he was about to murder in the inn yard, and first spotted his money, the way the crime appeared in his mind—and in his eyes—was as true as it was terrifying. This traveler, being a decent guy, offers him wine. You should see the fleeting memory of his better days wash over him as he takes the glass, and in a strange dazed way, he almost reaches out to tap the other man's glass or do something lighthearted with it; then he stops and downs it in one go, as if he were pouring it down a lime kiln. But that was nothing compared to what happened after he committed the murder and returned home with a basket of provisions, a pocket full of cash, and a poorly washed bloody right hand—which his little girl noticed. When the child asked him if he hurt his hand, the way he stepped aside, turned around, and looked over all his clothes for stains was so horrifically dreadful that it genuinely frightened me. He called for wine, and the wave of sickness that hit him when he saw the color was one of the things that triggered the gasp from the audience I mentioned earlier. Then he fell into a kind of bloody haze and stumbled through to the end, fixated solely on making his fortune with that money and a faint, dull kind of love for his child. It's impossible to express how incredible this performance was. I’ve never seen him reach such heights in anything else. He delivered two lines in such a way that it set him apart from all other actors. One was to his wife when he triumphantly showed her the money and she asked how he got it—'I found it'—and the other was to his old friend and tempter when he accused him of having killed that traveler, and he suddenly went completely mad and grabbed him by the throat and screamed, 'It wasn't me who murdered him—it was Misery!' And what a costume; what a face; and above all, the incredibly guilty, wicked thing he made out of a knotted tree branch for his walking stick from the moment the idea of murder hit him! I could write pages about him. It left an indelible impression. He became half-proud of that walking stick and half-afraid of it; he didn’t know whether to feel grim satisfaction from its jagged end or to hate and be horrified by it. He sat at a small table in the inn yard, drinking with the traveler; and this dreadful stick got between them like the Devil, while he counted on his fingers all the possible uses for the money."
That was at the close of February. In October, Dickens's longer residence began. He betook himself with his family, after two unsuccessful attempts in the new region of the Rue Balzac and Rue Lord Byron, to an apartment in the Avenue des Champs Elysées. Over him was an English bachelor with an establishment consisting of an English groom and five English horses. "The concierge and his wife told us that his name was Six, which drove me nearly mad until we discovered it to be Sykes." The situation was a good one, very cheerful for himself and with amusement for his children. It was a quarter of a mile above Franconi's on the other side of the way, and within a door or two of the Jardin d'Hiver. The Exposition was just below; the Barrière de l'Etoile from a quarter to half a mile below; and all Paris, including Emperor and Empress coming from and returning to St. Cloud, thronged past the windows in open carriages or on[125] horseback, all day long. Now it was he found himself more of a celebrity than when he had wintered in the city nine years before;[197] the feuilleton of the Moniteur was filled daily with a translation of Chuzzlewit; and he had soon to consider the proposal I have named, to publish in French his collected novels and tales.[198] Before[126] he had been a week in his new abode, Ary Scheffer, "a frank and noble fellow," had made his acquaintance; introduced him to several distinguished Frenchmen; and expressed the wish to paint him. To Scheffer was also due an advantage obtained for my friend's two little daughters of which they may always keep the memory with pride. "Mamey and Katey are learning Italian, and their master is Manin of Venetian fame, the best and the noblest of those unhappy gentlemen. He came here with a wife and a beloved daughter, and they are both dead. Scheffer made him known to me, and has been, I understand, wonderfully generous and good to him." Nor may I omit to state the enjoyment afforded him, not only by the presence in Paris during the winter of Mr. Wilkie Collins and of Mr. and Mrs. White of Bonchurch, but by the many friends from England whom the Art Exposition brought over. Sir Alexander Cockburn was one of these; Edwin Landseer, Charles Robert Leslie, and William Boxall, were others. Macready left his retreat at Sherborne to make him a visit of several days. Thackeray went to[127] and fro all the time between London and his mother's house, also in the Champs Elysées, where his daughters were. And Paris for the time was the home of Robert Lytton, who belonged to the Embassy, of the Sartorises, of the Brownings, and of others whom Dickens liked and cared for.
That was at the end of February. In October, Dickens's longer stay began. After two unsuccessful attempts in the new area of Rue Balzac and Rue Lord Byron, he moved with his family to an apartment on Avenue des Champs Elysées. Above him was an English bachelor who had an English groom and five English horses. "The concierge and his wife told us that his name was Six, which drove me nearly crazy until we found out it was Sykes." The location was great, very cheerful for him and entertaining for his children. It was a quarter mile past Franconi's on the other side of the road, and just a couple of doors down from the Jardin d'Hiver. The Exposition was right below; the Barrière de l'Etoile was a quarter to half a mile down; and all of Paris, including the Emperor and Empress coming from and returning to St. Cloud, passed by the windows in open carriages or on horseback all day long. He found that he was more of a celebrity than when he spent the winter in the city nine years earlier; the feuilleton of the Moniteur was filled daily with a translation of Chuzzlewit; and he soon had to think about the proposal I mentioned, to publish his collected novels and tales in French. Before he had been in his new home for a week, Ary Scheffer, "a straightforward and noble guy," had met him; introduced him to several distinguished Frenchmen; and expressed a desire to paint him. Thanks to Scheffer, my friend's two little daughters gained an opportunity they can always remember with pride. "Mamey and Katey are learning Italian, and their teacher is Manin of Venetian fame, the best and noblest of those unfortunate gentlemen. He came here with a wife and a beloved daughter, both of whom have passed away. Scheffer introduced me to him and, I understand, has been incredibly generous and kind to him." I also have to mention the enjoyment he had, not only from the presence in Paris during the winter of Mr. Wilkie Collins and Mr. and Mrs. White of Bonchurch, but also from many friends from England who were brought over by the Art Exposition. Sir Alexander Cockburn was one of them; Edwin Landseer, Charles Robert Leslie, and William Boxall were others. Macready left his retreat at Sherborne to visit him for several days. Thackeray was constantly traveling back and forth between London and his mother's house, also in the Champs Elysées, where his daughters were. And during that time, Paris was home to Robert Lytton, who was part of the Embassy, the Sartorises, the Brownings, and others whom Dickens admired and cared for.
At the first play he went to, the performance was stopped while the news of the last Crimean engagement, just issued in a supplement to the Moniteur, was read from the stage. "It made not the faintest effect upon the audience; and even the hired claqueurs, who had been absurdly loud during the piece, seemed to consider the war not at all within their contract, and were as stagnant as ditch-water. The theatre was full. It is quite impossible to see such apathy, and suppose the war to be popular, whatever may be asserted to the contrary." The day before, he had met the Emperor and the King of Sardinia in the streets, "and, as usual, no man touching his hat, and very very few so much as looking round."
At the first play he attended, the performance paused to read the news of the latest Crimean battle, just published in a supplement to the Moniteur, from the stage. "It had no effect on the audience whatsoever; even the hired clappers, who had been ridiculously loud during the show, seemed to think that the war was none of their business and were as lifeless as stagnant water. The theater was packed. It’s hard to witness such indifference and believe the war is popular, no matter what people say to the contrary." The day before, he had encountered the Emperor and the King of Sardinia in the streets, "and, as usual, no one lifted a hat, and very few even glanced their way."
The success of a most agreeable little piece by our old friend Regnier took him next to the Français, where Plessy's acting enchanted him. "Of course the interest of it turns upon a flawed piece of living china (that seems to be positively essential), but, as in most of these cases, if you will accept the position in which you find the people, you have nothing more to bother your morality about." The theatre in the Rue Richelieu, however, was not generally his favourite resort. He used to talk of it whimsically as a kind of tomb, where you went, as the Eastern people did in the stories, to think of your unsuccessful loves and dead[128] relations. "There is a dreary classicality at that establishment calculated to freeze the marrow. Between ourselves, even one's best friends there are at times very aggravating. One tires of seeing a man, through any number of acts, remembering everything by patting his forehead with the flat of his hand, jerking out sentences by shaking himself, and piling them up in pyramids over his head with his right forefinger. And they have a generic small comedy-piece, where you see two sofas and three little tables, to which a man enters with his hat on, to talk to another man—and in respect of which you know exactly when he will get up from one sofa to sit on the other, and take his hat off one table to put it upon the other—which strikes one quite as ludicrously as a good farce.[199] . . . There seems to be a good piece at the Vaudeville, on the idea of the Town and Country Mouse. It is too respectable and inoffensive for me to-night, but I hope to see it before I leave . . . I have a horrible idea of making friends with Franconi, and sauntering when I am at work into their sawdust green-room."
The success of a really enjoyable little piece by our old friend Regnier took him next to the Français, where Plessy's performance captivated him. "Of course, the story revolves around a flawed piece of living china (which seems to be absolutely essential), but, like in most cases, if you accept the situation in which you find the characters, you have nothing more to worry about regarding your morals." However, the theatre in the Rue Richelieu was not usually his favorite place to go. He liked to jokingly refer to it as a sort of tomb, where, like in the Eastern tales, you went to reflect on your failed romances and deceased relatives. "There's a dreary formality at that venue that’s likely to chill you to the bone. Between us, even your best friends there can sometimes be really annoying. You get tired of watching a guy, throughout multiple acts, remember everything by patting his forehead with his hand, delivering lines by shaking himself, and stacking them in layers over his head with his right forefinger. And they have a generic little comedy, where you see two sofas and three small tables, and a man walks in with his hat on to talk to another man—and you precisely know when he’ll get up from one sofa to sit on the other, and take his hat from one table to put it on the other—which is just as ridiculous as a good farce. There seems to be a decent piece at the Vaudeville, based on the idea of the Town and Country Mouse. It’s too proper and dull for me tonight, but I hope to check it out before I leave... I have a terrible thought of befriending Franconi and casually walking into their sawdust green room when I'm working."
At a theatre of a yet heavier school than the Français he had a drearier experience. "On Wednesday we went to the Odéon to see a new piece, in four acts and in verse, called Michel Cervantes. I suppose such[129] an infernal dose of ditch water never was concocted. But there were certain passages, describing the suppression of public opinion in Madrid, which were received with a shout of savage application to France that made one stare again! And once more, here again, at every pause, steady, compact, regular as military drums, the Ça Ira!" On another night, even at the Porte St. Martin, drawn there doubtless by the attraction of repulsion, he supped full with the horrors of classicality at a performance of Orestes versified by Alexandre Dumas. "Nothing have I ever seen so weighty and so ridiculous. If I had not already learnt to tremble at the sight of classic drapery on the human form, I should have plumbed the utmost depths of terrified boredom in this achievement. The chorus is not preserved otherwise than that bits of it are taken out for characters to speak. It is really so bad as to be almost good. Some of the Frenchified classical anguish struck me as so unspeakably ridiculous that it puts me on the broad grin as I write."
At a theatre even more serious than the Français, he had a much gloomier experience. "On Wednesday, we went to the Odéon to see a new play, in four acts and in verse, called Michel Cervantes. I guess such an awful mix of sludge has never been created. But there were parts describing the suppression of public opinion in Madrid that got a wild reaction, connecting it back to France in a way that made you look twice! And once again, at every pause, steady and sharp like military drums, the Ça Ira!" On another night, even at the Porte St. Martin, drawn there definitely by the odd attraction, he was fully immersed in the horrors of heavy classicism at a performance of Orestes adapted by Alexandre Dumas. "I've never seen anything so heavy and so absurd. If I hadn’t already learned to dread the sight of classic drapery on the human body, I would have reached the deepest level of terrified boredom with this piece. They don’t keep the chorus intact; parts of it are used for characters to speak. It’s honestly so bad that it's almost good. Some of the overly dramatic French classical anguish struck me as so laughably ridiculous that it makes me grin as I write."
At the same theatre, in the early spring, he had a somewhat livelier entertainment. "I was at the Porte St. Martin last night, where there is a rather good melodrama called Sang Melé, in which one of the characters is an English Lord—Lord William Falkland—who is called throughout the piece Milor Williams Fack Lorn, and is a hundred times described by others and described by himself as Williams. He is admirably played; but two English travelling ladies are beyond expression ridiculous, and there is something positively vicious in their utter want of truth. One 'set,' where the action of a whole act is supposed to take place in[130] the great wooden verandah of a Swiss hotel overhanging a mountain ravine, is the best piece of stage carpentering I have seen in France. Next week we are to have at the Ambigu Paradise Lost, with the murder of Abel, and the Deluge. The wildest rumours are afloat as to the un-dressing of our first parents." Anticipation far outdoes a reality of this kind; and at the fever-pitch to which rumours raised it here, Dickens might vainly have attempted to get admission on the first night, if Mr. Webster, the English manager and comedian, had not obtained a ticket for him. He went with Mr. Wilkie Collins. "We were rung in (out of the café below the Ambigu) at 8, and the play was over at half-past 1; the waits between the acts being very much longer than the acts themselves. The house was crammed to excess in every part, and the galleries awful with Blouses, who again, during the whole of the waits, beat with the regularity of military drums the revolutionary tune of famous memory—Ça Ira! The play is a compound of Paradise Lost and Byron's Cain; and some of the controversies between the archangel and the devil, when the celestial power argues with the infernal in conversational French, as 'Eh bien! Satan, crois-tu donc que notre Seigneur t'aurait exposé aux tourments que t'endures à présent, sans avoir prévu,' &c. &c. are very ridiculous. All the supernatural personages are alarmingly natural (as theatre nature goes), and walk about in the stupidest way. Which has occasioned Collins and myself to institute a perquisition whether the French ever have shown any kind of idea of the supernatural; and to decide this rather in the negative. The people are very well dressed, and Eve[131] very modestly. All Paris and the provinces had been ransacked for a woman who had brown hair that would fall to the calves of her legs—and she was found at last at the Odéon. There was nothing attractive until the 4th act, when there was a pretty good scene of the children of Cain dancing in, and desecrating, a temple, while Abel and his family were hammering hard at the Ark, outside; in all the pauses of the revel. The Deluge in the fifth act was up to about the mark of a drowning scene at the Adelphi; but it had one new feature. When the rain ceased, and the ark drove in on the great expanse of water, then lying waveless as the mists cleared and the sun broke out, numbers of bodies drifted up and down. These were all real men and boys, each separate, on a new kind of horizontal sloat. They looked horrible and real. Altogether, a merely dull business; but I dare say it will go for a long while."
At the same theater, in early spring, he enjoyed a somewhat more lively show. "I was at the Porte St. Martin last night, where there’s a pretty good melodrama called Sang Melé. One of the characters is an English Lord—Lord William Falkland—who is referred to throughout the play as Milor Williams Fack Lorn, and described by both others and himself as Williams. He’s played excellently; however, two English ladies in the audience are incredibly ridiculous, and their complete lack of authenticity is downright appalling. One scene, where the entire action of an act is meant to take place on the great wooden veranda of a Swiss hotel overlooking a mountain ravine, is the best piece of set design I’ve seen in France. Next week we’re set to see Paradise Lost at the Ambigu, featuring the murder of Abel and the Deluge. Wild rumors are circulating about the undressing of our first parents." Anticipation really exceeds the reality of this sort; and with the excitement stirred up by rumors, Dickens might have struggled to get in on the opening night if Mr. Webster, the English manager and comedian, hadn’t secured a ticket for him. He attended with Mr. Wilkie Collins. "We were let in (from the café below the Ambigu) at 8, and the play wrapped up at half-past 1; the intermissions between acts were far longer than the acts themselves. The theater was absolutely packed, and the balconies were filled with working-class people, who throughout the intermissions beat out the infamous revolutionary tune—Ça Ira! The play is a mix of Paradise Lost and Byron’s Cain; and some of the debates between the archangel and the devil, where the heavenly power converses with the infernal in conversational French, like 'Eh bien! Satan, crois-tu donc que notre Seigneur t'aurait exposé aux tourments que t'endures à présent, sans avoir prévu,' & & are quite ridiculous. All the supernatural characters seem alarmingly natural (as far as theatre goes), and they move around in the silliest ways. This led Collins and me to investigate whether the French have ever really conveyed any idea of the supernatural, and we concluded they generally have not. The people are well-dressed, and Eve[131] looks very modest. All of Paris and the provinces had been searched for a woman with brown hair that would reach the back of her calves—and they finally found her at the Odéon. There wasn’t anything appealing until the fourth act when there was a pretty good scene of Cain’s children dancing and desecrating a temple, while Abel and his family were laboring hard on the Ark outside during the revels. The Deluge in the fifth act was about on par with a drowning scene at the Adelphi, but it did have one new element. When the rain stopped, and the Ark floated in on the vast expanse of water, which was as calm as the mist cleared and the sun came out, numerous bodies drifted back and forth. These were all real men and boys, each on a new kind of horizontal raft. They looked horrifyingly real. Overall, it was a rather dull affair; but I imagine it will last for quite a while."
A piece of honest farce is a relief from these profane absurdities. "An uncommonly droll piece with an original comic idea in it has been in course of representation here. It is called Les Cheveux de ma Femme. A man who is dotingly fond of his wife, and who wishes to know whether she loved anybody else before they were married, cuts off a lock of her hair by stealth, and takes it to a great mesmeriser, who submits it to a clairvoyante who never was wrong. It is discovered that the owner of this hair has been up to the most frightful dissipations, insomuch that the clairvoyante can't mention half of them. The distracted husband goes home to reproach his wife, and she then reveals that she wears a wig, and takes it off."[132]
A genuinely funny farce is a welcome break from these ridiculous absurdities. "An exceptionally funny play with a unique comic idea has been performed here. It's called Les Cheveux de ma Femme. A man who is madly in love with his wife, and who wants to find out if she loved anyone else before they got married, secretly cuts off a lock of her hair and takes it to a famous mesmerist, who has a clairvoyant who is never wrong. It's revealed that the owner of this hair has led a life of shocking debauchery, so much that the clairvoyant can't even mention half of it. The distraught husband goes home to confront his wife, and she then reveals that she wears a wig and takes it off."[132]
The last piece he went to see before leaving Paris was a French version of As You Like It; but he found two acts of it to be more than enough. "In Comme il vous Plaira nobody had anything to do but to sit down as often as possible on as many stones and trunks of trees as possible. When I had seen Jacques seat himself on 17 roots of trees, and 25 grey stones, which was at the end of the second act, I came away." Only one more sketch taken in a theatre, and perhaps the best, I will give from these letters. It simply tells us what is necessary to understand a particular "tag" to a play, but it is related so prettily that the thing it celebrates could not have a nicer effect than is produced by this account of it. The play in question, Mémoires du Diable, and another piece of enchanting interest, the Médecin des Enfants,[200] were his favourites among all he saw at this time. "As I have no news, I may as well tell you about the tag that I thought so pretty[133] to the Mémoires du Diable; in which piece by the way, there is a most admirable part, most admirably played, in which a man says merely 'Yes' or 'No' all through the piece, until the last scene. A certain M. Robin has got hold of the papers of a deceased lawyer, concerning a certain estate which has been swindled away from its rightful owner, a Baron's widow, into other hands. They disclose so much roguery that he binds them up into a volume lettered 'Mémoires du Diable.' The knowledge he derives from these papers not only enables him to unmask the hypocrites all through the piece (in an excellent manner), but induces him to propose to the Baroness that if he restores to her her estate and good name—for even her marriage to the deceased Baron is denied—she shall give him her daughter in marriage. The daughter herself, on hearing the offer, accepts it; and a part of the plot is, her going to a masked ball, to which he goes as the Devil, to see how she likes him (when she finds, of course, that she likes him very much). The country people about the Château in dispute, suppose him to be really the Devil, because of his strange knowledge, and his strange comings and goings; and he, being with this girl in one of its old rooms, in the beginning of the 3rd act, shews her a little coffer on the table with a bell in it. 'They suppose,' he tells her, 'that whenever this bell is rung, I appear and obey the summons. Very ignorant, isn't it? But, if you ever want me particularly—very particularly—ring the little bell and try.' The plot proceeds to its development. The wrong-doers are exposed; the missing document, proving the marriage, is found; everything is finished; they[134] are all on the stage; and M. Robin hands the paper to the Baroness. 'You are reinstated in your rights, Madame; you are happy; I will not hold you to a compact made when you didn't know me; I release you and your fair daughter; the pleasure of doing what I have done, is my sufficient reward; I kiss your hand and take my leave. Farewell!' He backs himself courteously out; the piece seems concluded, everybody wonders, the girl (little Mdlle. Luther) stands amazed; when she suddenly remembers the little bell. In the prettiest way possible, she runs to the coffer on the table, takes out the little bell, rings it, and he comes rushing back and folds her to his heart. I never saw a prettier thing in my life. It made me laugh in that most delightful of ways, with the tears in my eyes; so that I can never forget it, and must go and see it again."
The last show he went to see before leaving Paris was a French version of As You Like It; but he found two acts to be more than enough. "In Comme il vous Plaira, nobody did anything but sit down as often as possible on as many stones and tree trunks as they could. After watching Jacques sit on 17 tree roots and 25 grey stones, which happened by the end of the second act, I left." Just one more sketch from a theater that might be the best, I’ll share from these letters. It simply explains what's needed to understand a particular "tag" in a play, but the story is told so beautifully that it produces a nicer effect than what it celebrates. The play in question, Mémoires du Diable, along with another captivating piece, the Médecin des Enfants,[200] were his favorites out of everything he saw at that time. "Since I have no news, I might as well tell you about the tag I thought was so pretty[133] in Mémoires du Diable; by the way, in this piece, there’s a remarkably well-played role where a man only says 'Yes' or 'No' throughout until the last scene. A certain M. Robin comes into possession of the papers from a deceased lawyer about an estate that was swindled from its rightful owner, a Baron's widow, into other hands. These papers reveal so much deceit that he binds them into a volume titled 'Mémoires du Diable.' The knowledge he gains from these papers not only lets him expose the hypocrites throughout the piece (in an excellent way) but also leads him to propose to the Baroness that if he restores her estate and good name—for even her marriage to the deceased Baron is denied—she will give him her daughter’s hand in marriage. The daughter herself, upon hearing the offer, accepts it; and part of the plot involves her attending a masked ball, during which he shows up as the Devil, to see how she reacts to him (and of course, she likes him very much). The local people around the disputed Château believe he is actually the Devil because of his strange knowledge and odd comings and goings; and when he is with this girl in one of the old rooms at the start of the 3rd act, he shows her a small box on the table with a bell inside. 'They think,' he tells her, 'that whenever this bell rings, I appear and respond to the call. Quite ignorant, isn’t it? But if you ever need me—especially—just ring the little bell and give it a try.' The plot continues to unfold. The wrongdoers are exposed; the missing document confirming the marriage is found; everything wraps up; they[134] are all on stage; and M. Robin hands the paper to the Baroness. 'You are restored to your rights, Madame; you are happy; I won’t hold you to a promise made when you didn’t know me; I release you and your lovely daughter; the joy from what I’ve done is enough reward for me; I kiss your hand and take my leave. Farewell!' He backs out politely; the piece seems to be over, everyone is in awe, and the girl (little Mdlle. Luther) is stunned; when she suddenly remembers the little bell. In the cutest way possible, she rushes to the box on the table, takes out the little bell, rings it, and he rushes back and pulls her into his embrace. I’ve never seen a prettier scene in my life. It made me laugh in the most delightful way, with tears in my eyes; so I can’t forget it, and I must go see it again."
But great as was the pleasure thus derived from the theatre, he was, in the matter of social intercourse, even more indebted to distinguished men connected with it by authorship or acting. At Scribe's he was entertained frequently; and "very handsome and pleasant" was his account of the dinners, as of all the belongings, of the prolific dramatist—a charming place in Paris, a fine estate in the country, capital carriage, handsome pair of horses, "all made, as he says, by his pen." One of the guests the first evening was Auber, "a stolid little elderly man, rather petulant in manner," who told Dickens he had once lived "at Stock Noonton" (Stoke Newington) to study English, but had forgotten it all. "Louis Philippe had invited him to meet the Queen of England, and when L. P. presented[135] him, the Queen said, 'We are such old acquaintances through M. Auber's works, that an introduction is quite unnecessary.'" They met again a few nights later, with the author of the History of the Girondins, at the hospitable table of M. Pichot, to whom Lamartine had expressed a strong desire again to meet Dickens as "un des grands amis de son imagination." "He continues to be precisely as we formerly knew him, both in appearance and manner; highly prepossessing, and with a sort of calm passion about him, very taking indeed. We talked of De Foe[201] and Richardson, and of that wonderful genius for the minutest details in a narrative, which has given them so much fame in France. I found him frank and unaffected, and full of curious knowledge of the French common people. He informed the company at dinner that he had rarely[136] met a foreigner who spoke French so easily as your inimitable correspondent, whereat your correspondent blushed modestly, and almost immediately afterwards so nearly choked himself with the bone of a fowl (which is still in his throat), that he sat in torture for ten minutes with a strong apprehension that he was going to make the good Pichot famous by dying like the little Hunchback at his table. Scribe and his wife were of the party, but had to go away at the ice-time because it was the first representation at the Opéra Comique of a new opera by Auber and himself, of which very great expectations have been formed. It was very curious to see him—the author of 400 pieces—getting nervous as the time approached, and pulling out his watch every minute. At last he dashed out as if he were going into what a friend of mine calls a plunge-bath. Whereat she rose and followed. She is the most extraordinary woman I ever beheld; for her eldest son must be thirty, and she has the figure of five-and-twenty, and is strikingly handsome. So graceful too, that her manner of rising, curtseying, laughing, and going out after him, was pleasanter than the pleasantest thing I have ever seen done on the stage." The opera Dickens himself saw a week later, and wrote of it as "most charming. Delightful music, an excellent story, immense stage tact, capital scenic arrangements, and the most delightful little prima donna ever seen or heard, in the person of Marie Cabel. It is called Manon Lescaut—from the old romance—and is charming throughout. She sings a laughing song in it which is received with madness, and which is the only real laughing song that ever was written. Auber told me[137] that when it was first rehearsed, it made a great effect upon the orchestra; and that he could not have had a better compliment upon its freshness than the musical director paid him, in coming and clapping him on the shoulder with 'Bravo, jeune homme! Cela promet bien!'"
But as much as he enjoyed the theater, he was even more grateful for the social connections he made with notable people involved in it as writers or actors. He was frequently entertained at Scribe's, and he described the dinners, and all of Scribe's possessions, as "very nice and pleasant"—a lovely place in Paris, a beautiful estate in the countryside, an impressive carriage, and a stunning pair of horses, all "made, as he says, by his pen." One of the guests the first evening was Auber, "a small, unassuming older man, somewhat irritable," who told Dickens he once lived "at Stock Noonton" (Stoke Newington) to learn English but had forgotten it all. "Louis Philippe invited him to meet the Queen of England, and when L.P. introduced him, the Queen said, 'We are such old acquaintances through M. Auber's works, that an introduction is quite unnecessary.'" They met again a few nights later with the author of the History of the Girondins, at M. Pichot's welcoming table, where Lamartine had expressed a strong desire to see Dickens again as "one of the great friends of his imagination." "He remains exactly as we remembered him, both in looks and demeanor; very engaging, with a calm passion about him that is truly captivating. We talked about Defoe and Richardson, and their incredible talent for the smallest details in storytelling, which has earned them much fame in France. I found him open and genuine, and he had a wealth of intriguing knowledge about the French common people. He told the dinner guests that he had rarely met a foreigner who spoke French as easily as your unforgettable correspondent, which made your correspondent blush modestly. Almost immediately after, he nearly choked on a poultry bone (which is still lodged in his throat), sitting in agony for ten minutes, worried he might make good old Pichot famous by dying like the little Hunchback at his table. Scribe and his wife were part of the group but had to leave at dessert time because it was the premiere of a new opera by Auber and himself at the Opéra Comique, for which there were very high expectations. It was quite interesting to watch him—the author of 400 pieces—become anxious as the time neared, constantly checking his watch. Finally, he dashed out as if he were heading into what a friend of mine refers to as a plunge-bath. She stood up and followed him. She is the most extraordinary woman I've ever seen; her oldest son must be thirty, yet she looks as if she's in her twenties and is strikingly beautiful. Her graceful manner of standing, curtsying, laughing, and exiting after him was more delightful than the most delightful thing I've ever seen performed on stage." Dickens saw the opera a week later and described it as "absolutely charming. Delightful music, an excellent storyline, great stage presence, fantastic scenic arrangements, and the most delightful little prima donna one has ever seen or heard, in the form of Marie Cabel. It's called Manon Lescaut—based on the old romance—and is charming throughout. She sings a cheerful song that is met with wild enthusiasm, and it's the only real fun song ever written. Auber told me that during the first rehearsal, it had a huge impact on the orchestra; he couldn't have asked for a better compliment on its freshness than what the musical director said when he came and patted him on the shoulder with 'Bravo, jeune homme! Cela promet bien!'"
At dinner at Regnier's he met M. Legouvet, in whose tragedy Rachel, after its acceptance, had refused to act Medea; a caprice which had led not only to her condemnation in costs of so much a night until she did act it, but to a quasi rivalry against her by Ristori, who was now on her way to Paris to play it in Italian. To this performance Dickens and Macready subsequently went together, and pronounced it to be hopelessly bad. "In the day entertainments, and little melodrama theatres, of Italy, I have seen the same thing fifty times, only not at once so conventional and so exaggerated. The papers have all been in fits respecting the sublimity of the performance, and the genuineness of the applause—particularly of the bouquets; which were thrown on at the most preposterous times in the midst of agonizing scenes, so that the characters had to pick their way among them, and a certain stout gentleman who played King Creon was obliged to keep a wary eye, all night, on the proscenium boxes, and dodge them as they came down. Now Scribe, who dined here next day (and who follows on the Ristori side, being offended, as everybody has been, by the insolence of Rachel), could not resist the temptation of telling us, that, going round at the end of the first act to offer his congratulations, he met all the bouquets coming back in men's arms to be thrown on again in the second act. . . .[138] By the bye, I see a fine actor lost in Scribe. In all his pieces he has everything done in his own way; and on that same night he was showing what Rachel did not do, and wouldn't do, in the last scene of Adrienne Lecouvreur, with extraordinary force and intensity."
At dinner at Regnier's, he ran into M. Legouvet, whose tragedy Rachel had initially refused to perform as Medea after it was accepted. This decision not only cost her money each night until she agreed to take on the role, but it also sparked a sort of rivalry with Ristori, who was on her way to Paris to perform it in Italian. Dickens and Macready later attended that show together and declared it to be completely terrible. "In the small theaters and little melodrama venues in Italy, I've seen the same thing fifty times, but never quite as conventional and exaggerated all at once. The newspapers have been raving about the brilliance of the performance and the authenticity of the applause—especially the bouquets, which were thrown at the most ridiculous moments during intense scenes, forcing the characters to carefully step around them. A certain stout gentleman playing King Creon had to keep a close watch on the balcony boxes all night, dodging them as they landed. Now, Scribe, who had dinner here the next day (and who takes Ristori's side, having been offended, like everyone else, by Rachel's arrogance), couldn’t help but share that when he went backstage to offer his congratulations at the end of the first act, he saw all the bouquets coming back in men's arms to be thrown again in the second act. By the way, I see a great actor wasted in Scribe. In all his works, he puts everything together in his own unique way; that same night, he was demonstrating what Rachel failed to do and wouldn’t do in the last scene of Adrienne Lecouvreur, with extraordinary force and intensity."
At the house of another great artist, Madame Viardot,[202] the sister of Malibran, Dickens dined to meet Georges Sands, that lady having appointed the day and hour for the interesting festival, which came off duly on the 10th of January. "I suppose it to be impossible to imagine anybody more unlike my preconceptions than the illustrious Sand. Just the kind of woman in appearance whom you might suppose to be the Queen's monthly nurse. Chubby, matronly, swarthy, black-eyed. Nothing of the blue-stocking about her, except[139] a little final way of settling all your opinions with hers, which I take to have been acquired in the country where she lives, and in the domination of a small circle. A singularly ordinary woman in appearance and manner. The dinner was very good and remarkably unpretending. Ourselves, Madame and her son, the Scheffers, the Sartorises, and some Lady somebody (from the Crimea last) who wore a species of paletot, and smoked. The Viardots have a house away in the new part of Paris, which looks exactly as if they had moved into it last week and were going away next. Notwithstanding which, they have lived in it eight years. The opera the very last thing on earth you would associate with the family. Piano not even opened. Her husband is an extremely good fellow, and she is as natural as it is possible to be."
At the home of another great artist, Madame Viardot,[202] the sister of Malibran, Dickens had dinner to meet Georges Sand, who had set the date and time for this interesting gathering, which took place on January 10th. "I can’t imagine anyone more different from what I expected than the famous Sand. She looks like the kind of woman you’d picture as the Queen's monthly nurse—chubby, motherly, dark-skinned, and black-eyed. There's nothing intellectual about her, except for a slight tendency to dismiss your opinions in favor of her own, which I think comes from living in her country and within a small social circle. She appears and behaves in a very ordinary way. The dinner was quite good and surprisingly low-key. There were just us, Madame and her son, the Scheffers, the Sartorises, and some Lady someone (just back from the Crimea) who wore a kind of coat and smoked. The Viardots have a house in the new part of Paris that looks as if they just moved in last week and will leave next week. Yet, they've lived there for eight years. You would never think of the opera when you think of this family. The piano wasn’t even touched. Her husband is a really nice guy, and she is as down-to-earth as possible."
Dickens was hardly the man to take fair measure of Madame Dudevant in meeting her thus. He was not familiar with her writings, and had no very special liking for such of them as he knew. But no disappointment, nothing but amazement, awaited him at a dinner that followed soon after. Emile de Girardin gave a banquet in his honour. His description of it, which he declares to be strictly prosaic, sounds a little Oriental, but not inappropriately so. "No man unacquainted with my determination never to embellish or fancify such accounts, could believe in the description I shall let off when we meet of dining at Emile Girardin's—of the three gorgeous drawing rooms with ten thousand wax candles in golden sconces, terminating in a dining-room of unprecedented magnificence with two enormous transparent plate-glass doors in it,[140] looking (across an ante-chamber full of clean plates) straight into the kitchen, with the cooks in their white paper caps dishing the dinner. From his seat in the midst of the table, the host (like a Giant in a Fairy story) beholds the kitchen, and the snow-white tables, and the profound order and silence there prevailing. Forth from the plate-glass doors issues the Banquet—the most wonderful feast ever tasted by mortal: at the present price of Truffles, that article alone costing (for eight people) at least five pounds. On the table are ground glass jugs of peculiar construction, laden with the finest growth of Champagne and the coolest ice. With the third course is issued Port Wine (previously unheard of in a good state on this continent), which would fetch two guineas a bottle at any sale. The dinner done, Oriental flowers in vases of golden cobweb are placed upon the board. With the ice is issued Brandy, buried for 100 years. To that succeeds Coffee, brought by the brother of one of the convives from the remotest East, in exchange for an equal quantity of California gold dust. The company being returned to the drawing-room—tables roll in by unseen agency, laden with Cigarettes from the Hareem of the Sultan, and with cool drinks in which the flavour of the Lemon arrived yesterday from Algeria, struggles voluptuously with the delicate Orange arrived this morning from Lisbon. That period past, and the guests reposing on Divans worked with many-coloured blossoms, big table rolls in, heavy with massive furniture of silver, and breathing incense in the form of a little present of Tea direct from China—table and all, I believe; but cannot swear to it, and am resolved to be prosaic. All[141] this time the host perpetually repeats 'Ce petit dîner-ci n'est que pour faire la connaissance de Monsieur Dickens; il ne compte pas; ce n'est rien.' And even now I have forgotten to set down half of it—in particular the item of a far larger plum pudding than ever was seen in England at Christmas time, served with a celestial sauce in colour like the orange blossom, and in substance like the blossom powdered and bathed in dew, and called in the carte (carte in a gold frame like a little fish-slice to be handed about) 'Hommage à l'illustre écrivain d'Angleterre.' That illustrious man staggered out at the last drawing-room door, speechless with wonder, finally; and even at that moment his host, holding to his lips a chalice set with precious stones and containing nectar distilled from the air that blew over the fields of beans in bloom for fifteen summers, remarked 'Le dîner que nous avons eu, mon cher, n'est rien—il ne compte pas—il a été tout-à-fait en famille—il faut dîner (en vérité, dîner) bientôt. Au plaisir! Au revoir! Au dîner!'"
Dickens was not the right person to truly appreciate Madame Dudevant when he met her like this. He wasn’t familiar with her writings and didn’t have a strong preference for the ones he knew. But he was met with nothing but amazement at a dinner that took place shortly after. Emile de Girardin hosted a banquet in his honor. His account of it, which he claims is purely straightforward, sounds somewhat exotic, but fittingly so. "No one who doesn’t know my firm resolve to avoid embellishing or glorifying such stories could believe the description I’ll share when we meet about dining at Emile Girardin's—of the three stunning drawing rooms filled with ten thousand wax candles in golden sconces, leading to a dining room of unmatched opulence with two huge transparent glass doors, looking (across an anteroom filled with clean plates) directly into the kitchen, where the cooks in white paper caps are serving dinner. From his seat in the center of the table, the host (like a Giant in a Fairy tale) views the kitchen, the pristine tables, and the deep order and silence that reigns there. From the plate-glass doors emerges the Banquet—the most extraordinary feast ever experienced by a human: considering today’s price for Truffles, that alone would cost at least five pounds for eight people. The table is set with uniquely designed glass jugs filled with the finest Champagne and the coolest ice. Along with the third course, they serve Port Wine (previously unheard of in good condition in this continent), which would sell for two guineas a bottle anywhere. Once dinner is over, Oriental flowers in golden cobweb vases adorn the table. Accompanying the ice, they serve Brandy, aged for 100 years. Following that is Coffee, brought by the brother of one of the guests from the farthest East, in exchange for an equal weight of California gold dust. When the group returns to the drawing room, tables roll in by some unseen force, piled high with Cigarettes from the Sultan's Harem, and refreshing drinks where the flavor of Lemons that arrived yesterday from Algeria mixes delightfully with the delicate Oranges that came this morning from Lisbon. After this, as guests relax on Divans decorated with colorful blossoms, hefty tables are rolled in, loaded with heavy silver furnishings, and wafting fragrances of a small gift of Tea straight from China—table and all, I think; but I can’t be certain, and I intend to be straightforward. All this time, the host continuously repeats, 'This little dinner is just to introduce Monsieur Dickens; it doesn’t count; it’s nothing.' And even now I’ve forgotten to mention half of it—especially the detail of a much larger plum pudding than ever seen in England at Christmas, served with a heavenly sauce that is orange blossom in color and resembles the blossom powdered and bathed in dew, listed on the menu (the menu in a gold frame like a little fish slice to be passed around) as 'Hommage à l'illustre écrivain d'Angleterre.' That distinguished man staggered out through the last drawing room door, speechless with wonder, and even at that moment, his host, holding a gem-encrusted chalice containing nectar distilled from the air blowing over blooming bean fields for fifteen summers, remarked, 'The dîner we just had, my dear, is nothing—it doesn’t count—it was all quite informal—we must have dinner (truly, have dinner) soon. To pleasure! Goodbye! To dinner!'"
The second dinner came, wonderful as the first; among the company were Regnier, Jules Sandeau, and the new Director of the Français; and his host again played Lucullus in the same style, with success even more consummate. The only absolutely new incident however was that "After dinner he asked me if I would come into another room and smoke a cigar? and on my saying Yes, coolly opened a drawer, containing about 5000 inestimable cigars in prodigious bundles—just as the Captain of the Robbers in Ali Baba might have gone to a corner of the cave for bales of brocade. A little man dined who was blacking[142] shoes 8 years ago, and is now enormously rich—the richest man in Paris—having ascended with rapidity up the usual ladder of the Bourse. By merely observing that perhaps he might come down again, I clouded so many faces as to render it very clear to me that everybody present was at the same game for some stake or other!" He returned to that subject in a letter a few days later. "If you were to see the steps of the Bourse at about 4 in the afternoon, and the crowd of blouses and patches among the speculators there assembled, all howling and haggard with speculation, you would stand aghast at the consideration of what must be going on. Concierges and people like that perpetually blow their brains out, or fly into the Seine, 'à cause des pertes sur la Bourse.' I hardly ever take up a French paper without lighting on such a paragraph. On the other hand, thoroughbred horses without end, and red velvet carriages with white kid harness on jet black horses, go by here all day long; and the pedestrians who turn to look at them, laugh, and say 'C'est la Bourse!' Such crashes must be staved off every week as have not been seen since Law's time."
The second dinner arrived, just as amazing as the first; among the guests were Regnier, Jules Sandeau, and the new Director of the Français. Once again, his host played the role of Lucullus with even greater success. The only completely new event was when he asked me after dinner if I wanted to go into another room and smoke a cigar. When I said yes, he casually opened a drawer filled with about 5,000 priceless cigars in huge bundles—just like how the Captain of the Robbers in Ali Baba would have gone to a corner of the cave for bales of brocade. There was a little man at dinner who was polishing shoes eight years ago and is now incredibly rich—the richest man in Paris—having quickly climbed the usual ladder of the stock market. By simply suggesting that he might come crashing down again, I darkened so many faces that it became clear to me that everyone present was in the same risky game for some kind of stake! He brought that topic up again in a letter a few days later. "If you were to see the steps of the stock exchange around 4 in the afternoon, with all the crowds of people in tattered clothes among the speculators gathered there, all yelling and looking haggard from stress, you would be shocked by what must be happening. Doormen and people like that continually take their own lives or jump into the Seine, 'because of losses on the stock market.' I can hardly ever pick up a French paper without coming across such a report. On the flip side, high-class horses and red velvet carriages with white leather harnesses pulled by jet-black horses go by here all day; and the pedestrians who stop to watch them laugh and say, 'C'est la Bourse!' Such crashes need to be averted every week that haven't been seen since Law's time."
Another picture connects itself with this, and throws light on the speculation thus raging. The French loans connected with the war, so much puffed and praised in England at the time for the supposed spirit in which they were taken up, had in fact only ministered to the commonest and lowest gambling; and the war had never in the least been popular. "Emile Girardin," wrote Dickens on the 23rd of March, "was here yesterday, and he says that Peace is to be formally announced[143] at Paris to-morrow amid general apathy." But the French are never wholly apathetic to their own exploits; and a display with a touch of excitement in it had been witnessed a couple of months before on the entry of the troops from the Crimea,[203] when the Zouaves, as they marched past, pleased Dickens most. "A remarkable body of men," he wrote, "wild, dangerous, and picturesque. Close-cropped head, red skull cap, Greek jacket, full red petticoat trowsers trimmed with yellow, and high white gaiters—the most sensible things for the purpose I know, and coming into use in the line. A man with such things on his legs is always free there, and ready for a muddy march; and might flounder through roads two feet deep in mud, and, simply by changing his gaiters (he has another pair in his haversack), be clean and comfortable and wholesome again, directly. Plenty of beard and moustache,[144] and the musket carried reverse-wise with the stock over the shoulder, make up the sunburnt Zouave. He strides like Bobadil, smoking as he goes; and when he laughs (they were under my window for half-an-hour or so), plunges backward in the wildest way, as if he were going to throw a sommersault. They have a black dog belonging to the regiment, and, when they now marched along with their medals, this dog marched after the one non-commissioned officer he invariably follows with a profound conviction that he was decorated. I couldn't see whether he had a medal, his hair being long; but he was perfectly up to what had befallen his regiment; and I never saw anything so capital as his way of regarding the public. Whatever the regiment does, he is always in his place; and it was impossible to mistake the air of modest triumph which was now upon him. A small dog corporeally, but of a great mind."[204] On that night there was an illumination in honour of the army, when the "whole of Paris, bye streets and lanes and all sorts of out of the way places, was most brilliantly illuminated. It looked in the dark like Venice and Genoa rolled into one, and split up through the middle by the Corso at Rome in the carnival time. The French people certainly do know how to honour their own countrymen, in a most marvellous way." It was the festival time of the New Year, and Dickens was fairly lost in a mystery of amazement at where the money could come from that everybody was spending on the étrennes they were giving to everybody[145] else. All the famous shops on the Boulevards had been blockaded for more than a week. "There is now a line of wooden stalls, three miles long, on each side of that immense thoroughfare; and wherever a retiring house or two admits of a double line, there it is. All sorts of objects from shoes and sabots, through porcelain and crystal, up to live fowls and rabbits which are played for at a sort of dwarf skittles (to their immense disturbance, as the ball rolls under them and shakes them off their shelves and perches whenever it is delivered by a vigorous hand), are on sale in this great Fair. And what you may get in the way of ornament for two-pence, is astounding." Unhappily there came dark and rainy weather, and one of the improvements of the Empire ended, as so many others did, in slush and misery.[205]
Another picture connects to this and sheds light on the speculation that's currently happening. The French loans associated with the war, which were highly praised and promoted in England at the time for their supposed spirit, actually just fed into the lowest form of gambling; and the war was never really popular. "Emile Girardin," Dickens wrote on March 23, "was here yesterday, and he says that Peace is set to be officially announced[143] in Paris tomorrow amidst general apathy." But the French never completely ignore their own achievements; a sense of excitement had been evident a couple of months earlier during the arrival of the troops from Crimea,[203] when the Zouaves, as they marched by, were particularly impressive to Dickens. "A remarkable group of men," he wrote, "wild, dangerous, and visually striking. With close-cropped hair, a red skull cap, Greek jacket, full red trousers trimmed with yellow, and high white gaiters—the most practical attire I know, and becoming standard in the ranks. A man dressed like this can easily navigate muddy paths; he could wade through two feet of mud, and simply by swapping his gaiters (he has another pair in his pack), be clean and comfortable again in no time. They sport a lot of facial hair, and they carry their muskets with the stock over their shoulder, making up the sunburnt Zouave. He strides like Bobadil, smoking as he walks; and when he laughs (they were under my window for about half an hour), he leans back wildly, as if he's about to do a somersault. They have a black dog that belongs to the regiment, and when they marched with their medals, this dog followed the one non-commissioned officer he always trails, convinced he was decorated. I couldn't tell if he had a medal because of his long hair, but he clearly knew what had happened to his regiment; and I’ve never seen anything quite as charming as his reaction to the public. No matter what the regiment does, he's always right there; and it was impossible to miss the look of quiet pride he had now. A small dog physically, but with a big personality."[204] That night, there was an illumination in honor of the army, where "the whole of Paris, back streets and alleys, and all kinds of hidden places, was brilliantly lit up. In the dark, it looked like a mix of Venice and Genoa split down the middle by the Corso in Rome during carnival season. The French certainly know how to honor their own countrymen in a spectacular way." It was New Year’s festival time, and Dickens found himself mystified by where all the money being spent on gifts (étrennes) for everyone else was coming from[145]. All the popular shops on the Boulevards had been taken over for more than a week. "There’s now a line of wooden stalls, three miles long, on each side of that immense roadway; and wherever an empty shop or two allows for a double line, it’s there. All kinds of items from shoes and wooden clogs to porcelain and crystal, even live chickens and rabbits which are played for at a kind of dwarf skittles (to their great distress, as the ball rolls under them and shakes them off their shelves and perches whenever someone throws it with force), are on sale in this huge Fair. And what you can get in terms of decoration for two-pence is staggering." Unfortunately, dark and rainy weather hit, and one of the improvements of the Empire ended, like so many others, in mud and misery.[205]
Some sketches connected with the Art Exposition in the winter of 1855, and with the fulfilment of Ary Scheffer's design to paint the portrait of Dickens, may close these Paris pictures. He did not think that English art showed to advantage beside the French. It seemed to him small, shrunken, insignificant, "niggling." He thought the general absence of ideas horribly apparent; "and even when one comes to Mulready, and sees two old men talking over a much-too-prominent table-cloth, and reads the French explanation of their proceedings, 'La discussion sur les principes de Docteur Whiston,' one is dissatisfied. Somehow or other they don't tell. Even Leslie's Sancho wants go, and Stanny is too much like a set-scene. It is of no use disguising the fact that what we know to be wanting in the men is wanting in their works—character, fire, purpose, and the power of using the vehicle and the model as mere means to an end. There is a horrible respectability about most of the best of them—a little, finite, systematic routine in them, strangely expressive to me of the state of England itself. As a mere fact, Frith, Ward, and Egg, come out the best in such pictures as are here, and attract to the greatest extent. The first, in the picture from the Good-natured Man; the second, in the Royal Family in the Temple; the third, in the Peter the Great first seeing Catherine—which I always thought a good picture, and in which foreigners evidently descry a sudden dramatic touch that pleases them. There are no end[147] of bad pictures among the French, but, Lord! the goodness also!—the fearlessness of them; the bold drawing; the dashing conception; the passion and action in them![206] The Belgian department is full of merit. It has the best landscape in it, the best portrait, and the best scene of homely life, to be found in the building. Don't think it a part of my despondency about public affairs, and my fear that our national glory is on the decline, when I say that mere form and conventionalities usurp, in English art, as in English government and social relations, the place of living force and truth. I tried to resist the impression yesterday, and went to the English gallery first, and praised and admired with great diligence; but it was of no use. I could not make anything better of it than what I tell you. Of course this is between ourselves. Friendship is better than criticism, and I shall steadily hold my tongue. Discussion is worse than useless when you cannot agree about what you are going to discuss." French nature is all wrong, said the English artists whom Dickens talked to; but surely not because it is French, was his reply. The English point of view is[148] not the only one to take men and women from. The French pictures are "theatrical," was the rejoinder. But the French themselves are a demonstrative and gesticulating people, was Dickens's retort; and what thus is rendered by their artists is the truth through an immense part of the world. "I never saw anything so strange. They seem to me to have got a fixed idea that there is no natural manner but the English manner (in itself so exceptional that it is a thing apart, in all countries); and that unless a Frenchman—represented as going to the guillotine for example—is as calm as Clapham, or as respectable as Richmond-hill, he cannot be right."
Some sketches related to the Art Exposition in the winter of 1855, and to Ary Scheffer's plan to paint Dickens's portrait, might wrap up these Paris impressions. He felt that English art didn't hold up well against French art. To him, it seemed small, diminished, trivial, "petty." He thought the widespread lack of ideas was painfully obvious; "and even when you look at Mulready, with two old men chatting over a very prominent tablecloth, and read the French explanation of their conversation, 'La discussion sur les principes de Docteur Whiston,' it leaves you feeling unsatisfied. They don’t quite convey what they should. Even Leslie's Sancho feels off, and Stanny resembles a set piece too much. It's pointless to hide the reality that what's lacking in the artists is also missing in their works—character, passion, purpose, and the ability to use the medium and the model as tools to achieve something greater. There's a disturbing respectability about many of the best among them—a little, finite, systematic routine that oddly reflects England's state itself. In fact, Frith, Ward, and Egg stand out the most in the works displayed here and draw the most attention. The first stands out in the picture from the Good-natured Man; the second shines in the Royal Family in the Temple; the third in Peter the Great first seeing Catherine—which I've always thought was a good picture, and in which foreigners clearly see a sudden dramatic flair that fascinates them. There are countless poor pictures among the French, but the quality among the good ones!—their fearlessness; bold drawing; striking concepts; the passion and movement in them! The Belgian section is quite impressive. It features the best landscape, the best portrait, and the best scene of everyday life in the venue. Don't think that when I say that mere form and conventions dominate English art, just like they do in English government and social relations, it's due to my worries about public issues and my fear that our national pride is waning. I tried to fight against this feeling yesterday and went to the English gallery first, giving praise and admiration earnestly; but it was futile. I couldn't come away with anything better than what I've shared with you. Of course, this is just between us. Friendship outweighs criticism, and I plan to keep my mouth shut. Discussion is pointless when you can't find common ground on what you're discussing." The English artists Dickens spoke with claimed French nature was all wrong; but Dickens replied, surely it's not wrong just because it's French. The English perspective isn't the only way to view people. They'd counter that French pictures are "theatrical." But Dickens would shoot back that the French themselves are an expressive and gesturing people, and what their artists capture reflects reality for a significant portion of the world. "I've never seen anything so odd. They seem convinced that there's no natural style but the English style (which is so unique that it's separate in every country); and that unless a French person—say someone going to the guillotine—is as composed as someone from Clapham or as respectable as Richmond Hill, they can't be right."
To the sittings at Ary Scheffer's some troubles as well as many pleasures were incident, and both had mention in his letters. "You may faintly imagine what I have suffered from sitting to Scheffer every day since I came back. He is a most noble fellow, and I have the greatest pleasure in his society, and have made all sorts of acquaintances at his house; but I can scarcely express how uneasy and unsettled it makes me to have to sit, sit, sit, with Little Dorrit on my mind, and the Christmas business too—though that is now happily dismissed. On Monday afternoon, and all day on Wednesday, I am going to sit again. And the crowning feature is, that I do not discern the slightest resemblance, either in his portrait or his brother's! They both peg away at me at the same time." The sittings were varied by a special entertainment, when Scheffer received some sixty people in his "long atelier"—"including a lot of French who say (but I don't believe it) that they know English"—to whom[149] Dickens, by special entreaty, read his Cricket on the Hearth.
To the sessions at Ary Scheffer's, there were some troubles as well as many pleasures, both of which he mentioned in his letters. "You can barely imagine what I've gone through sitting for Scheffer every day since I got back. He’s a truly great guy, and I really enjoy his company, plus I’ve made all sorts of friends at his house; but I can hardly express how restless and unsettled it makes me to have to just sit, sit, sit, with Little Dorrit on my mind, along with the Christmas stuff too—though that is thankfully behind me now. On Monday afternoon, and all day on Wednesday, I’m going to sit again. And the funny thing is, I don’t see the slightest resemblance in either his portrait or his brother's! They both keep at me at the same time." The sessions were mixed up with a special gathering when Scheffer hosted about sixty people in his "long studio"—"including a lot of French who claim (but I don’t believe it) that they know English"—to whom[149] Dickens, at their special request, read his Cricket on the Hearth.
That was at the close of November. January came, and the end of the sittings was supposed to be at hand. "The nightmare portrait is nearly done; and Scheffer promises that an interminable sitting next Saturday, beginning at 10 o'clock in the morning, shall finish it. It is a fine spirited head, painted at his very best, and with a very easy and natural appearance in it. But it does not look to me at all like, nor does it strike me that if I saw it in a gallery I should suppose myself to be the original. It is always possible that I don't know my own face. It is going to be engraved here, in two sizes and ways—the mere head and the whole thing." A fortnight later, the interminable sitting came. "Imagine me if you please with No. 5 on my head and hands, sitting to Scheffer yesterday four hours! At this stage of a story, no one can conceive how it distresses me." Still this was not the last. March had come before the portrait was done. "Scheffer finished yesterday; and Collins, who has a good eye for pictures, says that there is no man living who could do the painting about the eyes. As a work of art I see in it spirit combined with perfect ease, and yet I don't see myself. So I come to the conclusion that I never do see myself. I shall be very curious to know the effect of it upon you." March had then begun; and at its close Dickens, who had meanwhile been in England, thus wrote: "I have not seen Scheffer since I came back, but he told Catherine a few days ago that he was not satisfied with the likeness after all, and thought he must do more to it. My[150] own impression of it, you remember?" In these few words he anticipated the impression made upon myself. I was not satisfied with it. The picture had much merit, but not as a portrait. From its very resemblance in the eyes and mouth one derived the sense of a general unlikeness. But the work of the artist's brother, Henri Scheffer, painted from the same sittings, was in all ways greatly inferior.
That was at the end of November. January came, and the final sittings were supposed to be near. "The nightmare portrait is almost finished, and Scheffer has promised that an endless sitting next Saturday, starting at 10 in the morning, will complete it. It’s a beautifully spirited head, done at his best, and it has a relaxed and natural look. But it doesn’t look like me at all, and I doubt that if I saw it in a gallery, I would recognize myself. It's possible that I don’t know my own face. It’s going to be engraved here in two sizes—just the head and the whole piece." Two weeks later, the endless sitting happened. "Imagine me, if you can, with No. 5 on my head and hands, sitting for Scheffer yesterday for four hours! At this point in the story, no one can understand how much this disturbs me." Still, this wasn’t the last sitting. March arrived before the portrait was complete. "Scheffer finished yesterday, and Collins, who has a good eye for art, says that no one alive could paint the eyes like that. As a work of art, I see spirit combined with perfect ease, yet I still don’t see myself. So I’ve come to the conclusion that I never really see myself. I’m really curious to know how it will affect you." By the end of March, Dickens, who had been in England in the meantime, wrote: "I haven't seen Scheffer since I got back, but he told Catherine a few days ago that he isn’t satisfied with the likeness after all and thinks he needs to do more to it. My[150] own impression of it, you remember?" In those few words, he captured my own feelings about it. I wasn’t satisfied with it. The painting had a lot of merit, but not as a portrait. Its resemblance in the eyes and mouth gave a sense of an overall unlikeness. However, the work of the artist's brother, Henri Scheffer, painted from the same sittings, was significantly inferior in every way.
Before Dickens left Paris in May he had sent over two descriptions that the reader most anxious to follow him to a new scene would perhaps be sorry to lose. A Duchess was murdered in the Champs Elysées. "The murder over the way (the third or fourth event of that nature in the Champs Elysées since we have been here) seems to disclose the strangest state of things. The Duchess who is murdered lived alone in a great house which was always shut up, and passed her time entirely in the dark. In a little lodge outside lived a coachman (the murderer), and there had been a long succession of coachmen who had been unable to stay there, and upon whom, whenever they asked for their wages, she plunged out with an immense knife, by way of an immediate settlement. The coachman never had anything to do, for the coach hadn't been driven out for years; neither would she ever allow the horses to be taken out for exercise. Between the lodge and the house, is a miserable bit of garden, all overgrown with long rank grass, weeds, and nettles; and in this, the horses used to be taken out to swim—in a dead green vegetable sea, up to their haunches. On the day of the murder, there was a great crowd, of course; and in the midst of it up comes the Duke her husband (from whom she was separated),[151] and rings at the gate. The police open the grate. 'C'est vrai donc,' says the Duke, 'que Madame la Duchesse n'est plus?'—'C'est trop vrai, Monseigneur.'—'Tant mieux,' says the Duke, and walks off deliberately, to the great satisfaction of the assemblage."
Before Dickens left Paris in May, he sent over two descriptions that readers eager to follow him to a new scene would probably hate to miss. A Duchess was murdered in the Champs Elysées. "The murder nearby (the third or fourth incident of that kind in the Champs Elysées since we've been here) reveals the strangest situation. The murdered Duchess lived alone in a large house that was always shut up and spent all her time in the dark. In a small lodge outside lived a coachman (the murderer), and there had been a long line of coachmen who were unable to stay there, each of whom, whenever they asked for their pay, she attacked with a huge knife, as an immediate settlement. The coachman never had anything to do since the carriage hadn't been driven out for years; and she never allowed the horses to be taken out for exercise either. Between the lodge and the house was a miserable patch of garden, overgrown with tall grass, weeds, and nettles; and in this, the horses used to be taken out to swim—in a dead green sea of vegetation, up to their haunches. On the day of the murder, of course, there was a huge crowd; and in the middle of it, the Duke, her husband (from whom she was separated),[151] shows up and rings the gate. The police open the gate. 'Is it true then,' says the Duke, 'that Madame la Duchesse is no more?'—'It's too true, Monseigneur.'—'So much the better,' says the Duke, and walks away deliberately, much to the delight of the crowd."
The second description relates an occurrence in England of only three years previous date, belonging to that wildly improbable class of realities which Dickens always held, with Fielding, to be (properly) closed to fiction. Only, he would add, critics should not be so eager to assume that what had never happened to themselves could not, by any human possibility, ever be supposed to have happened to anybody else. "B. was with me the other day, and, among other things that he told me, described an extraordinary adventure in his life, at a place not a thousand miles from my 'property' at Gadshill, three years ago. He lived at the tavern and was sketching one day when an open carriage came by with a gentleman and lady in it. He was sitting in the same place working at the same sketch, next day, when it came by again. So, another day, when the gentleman got out and introduced himself. Fond of art; lived at the great house yonder, which perhaps he knew; was an Oxford man and a Devonshire squire, but not resident on his estate, for domestic reasons; would be glad to see him to dinner to-morrow. He went, and found among other things a very fine library. 'At your disposition,' said the Squire, to whom he had now described himself and his pursuits. 'Use it for your writing and drawing. Nobody else uses it.' He stayed in the house six months. The lady was a mistress,[152] aged five-and-twenty, and very beautiful, drinking her life away. The Squire was drunken, and utterly depraved and wicked; but an excellent scholar, an admirable linguist, and a great theologian. Two other mad visitors stayed the six months. One, a man well known in Paris here, who goes about the world with a crimson silk stocking in his breast pocket, containing a tooth-brush and an immense quantity of ready money. The other, a college chum of the Squire's, now ruined; with an insatiate thirst for drink; who constantly got up in the middle of the night, crept down to the dining-room, and emptied all the decanters. . . . B. stayed on in the place, under a sort of devilish fascination to discover what might come of it. . . . Tea or coffee never seen in the house, and very seldom water. Beer, champagne, and brandy, were the three drinkables. Breakfast: leg of mutton, champagne, beer, and brandy. Lunch: shoulder of mutton, champagne, beer, and brandy. Dinner: every conceivable dish (Squire's income, £7,000 a-year), champagne, beer, and brandy. The Squire had married a woman of the town from whom he was now separated, but by whom he had a daughter. The mother, to spite the father, had bred the daughter in every conceivable vice. Daughter, then 13, came from school once a month. Intensely coarse in talk, and always drunk. As they drove about the country in two open carriages, the drunken mistress would be perpetually tumbling out of one, and the drunken daughter perpetually tumbling out of the other. At last the drunken mistress drank her stomach away, and began to die on the sofa. Got worse and worse, and was always raving about Somebody's[153] where she had once been a lodger, and perpetually shrieking that she would cut somebody else's heart out. At last she died on the sofa, and, after the funeral, the party broke up. A few months ago, B. met the man with the crimson silk stocking at Brighton, who told him that the Squire was dead 'of a broken heart'; that the chum was dead of delirium tremens; and that the daughter was heiress to the fortune. He told me all this, which I fully believe to be true, without any embellishment—just in the off-hand way in which I have told it to you."
The second description talks about an event in England that happened just three years ago, belonging to that surprisingly unlikely category of real-life situations that Dickens, along with Fielding, believed should be off-limits for fiction. However, he would add that critics shouldn't be so quick to assume that just because something has never happened to them, it couldn't possibly have happened to someone else. "B. was with me the other day, and among other stories he shared, he talked about an incredible adventure from his life, not far from my 'property' at Gadshill, three years back. He was staying at a tavern and was sketching one day when an open carriage passed by with a gentleman and lady inside. The next day, he was at the same spot working on the same sketch when the carriage went by again. Then, one day, the gentleman got out and introduced himself. He was an art enthusiast, lived at the big house nearby—which he might know of; he was an Oxford man and a Devonshire squire, but not living on his estate due to personal reasons; he’d be happy to have him over for dinner the next day. B. accepted and found, among other things, a really impressive library. 'It's at your service,' said the Squire after B. explained himself and his interests. 'Feel free to use it for your writing and drawing. No one else uses it.' He stayed in the house for six months. The lady was a mistress, twenty-five years old and very beautiful, wasting her life away in drink. The Squire was drunk, completely depraved, and wicked but was also a brilliant scholar, an excellent linguist, and a great theologian. Two other mad visitors stayed the same six months. One was a well-known man from Paris who traveled the world with a crimson silk stocking in his breast pocket, holding a toothbrush and a huge amount of cash. The other was a college buddy of the Squire’s, now ruined with an unquenchable thirst for alcohol; he would often get up in the middle of the night, sneak down to the dining room, and empty all the decanters. B. lingered in the place, under a sort of devilish fascination to see what might happen next. Tea or coffee were never seen in the house, and water was a rarity. Beer, champagne, and brandy were the main drinks. Breakfast consisted of leg of mutton, champagne, beer, and brandy. Lunch was shoulder of mutton, champagne, beer, and brandy. Dinner featured every imaginable dish (the Squire's income was £7,000 a year), accompanied by champagne, beer, and brandy. The Squire had married a woman from the town whom he was now separated from, but they had a daughter together. To get back at the father, the mother raised the daughter with every imaginable vice. The daughter, then 13, would come home from school once a month. She was extremely coarse in her language and always drunk. As they drove around the countryside in two open carriages, the drunken mistress would often tumble out of one, and the drunken daughter would tumble out of the other. Eventually, the drunken mistress drank herself into oblivion and began to die on the sofa. She got worse and worse, always raving about Somebody's place where she had once stayed as a lodger, and constantly shouting that she would cut someone else's heart out. Finally, she died on the sofa, and after the funeral, the group dispersed. A few months ago, B. ran into the man with the crimson silk stocking in Brighton, who told him that the Squire had died 'of a broken heart'; that the buddy had died from delirium tremens; and that the daughter was now the heir to the fortune. He shared all this with me, which I truly believe to be accurate, without any embellishment—just casually, as I’m telling you now."
Dickens left Paris at the end of April, and, after the summer in Boulogne which has been described, passed the winter in London, giving to his theatrical enterprise nearly all the time that Little Dorrit did not claim from him. His book was finished in the following spring; was inscribed to Clarkson Stanfield; and now claims to have something said about it.
Dickens left Paris at the end of April, and after spending the summer in Boulogne, as mentioned, he spent the winter in London, dedicating almost all his time to his theater project when he wasn’t working on Little Dorrit. He finished the book the following spring; it was dedicated to Clarkson Stanfield; and now it deserves some discussion.
CHAPTER VI.
LITTLE DORRIT, AND A LAZY TOUR.
1855-1857.
Between Hard Times and Little Dorrit, Dickens's principal literary work had been the contribution to Household Words of two tales for Christmas (1854 and 1855) which his readings afterwards made widely popular, the Story of Richard Doubledick,[207] and Boots at[155] the Holly-Tree Inn. In the latter was related, with a charming naturalness and spirit, the elopement, to get married at Gretna Green, of two little children of the mature respective ages of eight and seven. At Christmas 1855 came out the first number of Little Dorrit, and in April 1857 the last.
Between Hard Times and Little Dorrit, Dickens's main literary work was his contributions to Household Words, where he published two Christmas stories (1854 and 1855) that later became very popular through his readings, the Story of Richard Doubledick,[207] and Boots at[155] the Holly-Tree Inn. In the latter, he charmingly and spiritedly told the story of two young children, aged eight and seven, who eloped to get married at Gretna Green. In December 1855, the first installment of Little Dorrit was published, and the final part came out in April 1857.
The book took its origin from the notion he had of a leading man for a story who should bring about all the mischief in it, lay it all on Providence, and say at every fresh calamity, "Well it's a mercy, however, nobody was to blame you know!" The title first chosen, out of many suggested, was Nobody's Fault; and four numbers had been written, of which the first was on the eve of appearance, before this was changed. When about to fall to work he excused himself from an engagement he should have kept because "the story is breaking out all round me, and I am going off down the railroad to humour it." The humouring was a little difficult, however; and such indications of a droop in his invention as presented themselves in portions of Bleak House, were noticeable again. "As to the story I am in the second number, and last night and this morning had half a mind to begin again, and work in what I have done, afterwards." It had occurred to him, that, by making the fellow-travellers at once known to each other, as the opening of the story stands, he had missed an effect. "It struck me that it would be a new thing to show people coming together, in a chance way, as fellow-travellers, and being in the same place, ignorant of one another, as happens in life; and to connect them afterwards, and to make the waiting for that connection a part of the interest."[156] The change was not made; but the mention of it was one of several intimations to me of the altered conditions under which he was writing, and that the old, unstinted, irrepressible flow of fancy had received temporary check. In this view I have found it very interesting to compare the original notes, which as usual he prepared for each number of the tale, and which with the rest are in my possession, with those of Chuzzlewit or Copperfield; observing in the former the labour and pains, and in the latter the lightness and confidence of handling.[208] "I am just now getting to work on number three: sometimes enthusiastic, more often dull enough. There is an enormous outlay in the Father of the Marshalsea chapter, in the way of getting a great lot of matter into a small space. I am not quite resolved, but I have a great idea of overwhelming that family with wealth. Their condition would be very curious. I can make Dorrit very strong in the story, I hope." The Marshalsea part of the tale undoubtedly was excellent, and there was masterly treatment of character in the contrasts of the brothers Dorrit; but of the family generally it may be said that its least important members had most of his genius in them. The younger of the brothers, the scapegrace son, and "Fanny dear," are perfectly real people in what makes them unattractive; but what is meant for attractiveness in the heroine becomes often tiresome by want of reality.
The book started from his idea of a main character for a story who creates all the chaos, blames it on fate, and at every new disaster says, "Well, at least nobody's to blame, right?" The first title he picked, out of many suggestions, was Nobody's Fault; and he had written four chapters, with the first about to be published, before changing it. When he was about to get started, he backed out of a commitment because "the story is pouring out all around me, and I need to go down the railroad to go with it." However, going with it proved difficult, and signs of a dip in his creativity, which appeared in parts of Bleak House, showed up again. "As for the story, I'm on the second chapter, and last night and this morning I almost thought about starting over and fitting in what I’ve done later." He realized that by introducing the fellow travelers to each other right away, as the story begins, he had missed a certain effect. "It struck me that it would be a fresh approach to show people coming together randomly as fellow travelers, being in the same place without knowing each other, as often happens in real life; and to connect them later, making the wait for that connection part of the intrigue."[156] The change wasn’t made, but this mention was one of several hints to me that the conditions surrounding his writing had changed, and that the old, free-flowing, unstoppable wave of creativity had hit a temporary block. In this light, I found it fascinating to compare the original notes, which he usually prepared for each chapter of the story and which I still have, with those from Chuzzlewit or Copperfield; noticing in the former the effort and struggle, and in the latter the ease and confidence. [208] "I’m currently working on number three: sometimes I’m enthusiastic, but more often it’s pretty dull. There’s a huge demand in the Father of the Marshalsea chapter to fit a lot of content into a small space. I'm still uncertain, but I really feel like overwhelming that family with wealth. Their situation would be quite interesting. I hope I can make Dorrit a strong character in the story." The Marshalsea part of the tale was undoubtedly great, and he skillfully portrayed the characters, particularly the contrasts between the Dorrit brothers; but it can be said that the family’s least significant members showcased most of his talent. The younger brother, the reckless son, and "Fanny dear," are completely believable in what makes them unappealing; however, the qualities intended to make the heroine appealing often become tedious due to a lack of authenticity.
The first number appeared in December 1855, and[159] on the 2nd there was an exultant note. "Little Dorrit has beaten even Bleak House out of the field. It is a most tremendous start, and I am overjoyed at it;" to which he added, writing from Paris on the 6th of the month following, "You know that they had sold 35,000 of number two on new year's day." He was still in Paris on the day of the appearance of that portion of the tale by which it will always be most vividly remembered, and thus wrote on the 30th of January 1856: "I have a grim pleasure upon me to-night in thinking that the Circumlocution Office sees the light, and in wondering what effect it will make. But my head really stings with the visions of the book, and I am going, as we French say, to disembarrass it by plunging out into some of the strange places I glide into of nights in these latitudes." The Circumlocution heroes led to the Society scenes, the Hampton-court dowager-sketches, and Mr. Gowan; all parts of one satire levelled against prevailing political and social vices. Aim had been taken, in the course of it, at some living originals, disguised sufficiently from recognition to enable him to make his thrust more sure; but there was one exception self-revealed. "I had the general idea," he wrote while engaged on the sixth number, "of the Society business before the Sadleir affair, but I shaped Mr. Merdle himself out of that precious rascality. Society, the Circumlocution Office, and Mr. Gowan, are of course three parts of one idea and design. Mr. Merdle's complaint, which you will find in the end to be fraud and forgery, came into my mind as the last drop in the silver cream-jug on Hampstead-heath. I shall beg, when you have read the[160] present number, to enquire whether you consider 'Bar' an instance, in reference to K F, of a suggested likeness in not many touches!" The likeness no one could mistake; and, though that particular Bar has since been moved into a higher and happier sphere, Westminster-hall is in no danger of losing "the insinuating Jury-droop, and persuasive double-eyeglass," by which this keen observer could express a type of character in half a dozen words.
The first issue came out in December 1855, and on the 2nd there was an excited note. "*Little Dorrit* has even beaten *Bleak House* out of the competition. It’s a remarkable start, and I’m thrilled about it;" he added, writing from Paris on the 6th of the following month, "You know they sold 35,000 copies of the second issue on New Year’s Day." He was still in Paris on the day this part of the story debuted, and on January 30, 1856, he wrote: "I have a grim pleasure tonight thinking that the Circumlocution Office is being revealed, and I wonder what impact it will have. But my head is really buzzing with images from the book, and I’m going to, as the French say, clear it out by diving into some of the strange places I wander into at night in this part of the world." The Circumlocution characters led to the Society scenes, the sketches of the dowagers in Hampton Court, and Mr. Gowan; all parts of a single satire aimed at existing political and social issues. He had targeted some real-life inspirations, disguised enough for him to make his critique more pointed; but there was one clear exception. "I had the general idea," he wrote while working on the sixth issue, "of the Society stuff before the Sadleir incident, but I shaped Mr. Merdle himself from that wretched rascality. Society, the Circumlocution Office, and Mr. Gowan are of course three parts of one concept and plan. Mr. Merdle’s issue, which you will discover to be fraud and forgery, came to mind as the final drop into the silver cream jug on Hampstead Heath. I’d like to ask, once you’ve read the present issue, whether you think ‘Bar’ is an example, in reference to K F, of a suggested resemblance in just a few details!" The resemblance was undeniable; and although that specific Bar has since moved to a better and happier place, Westminster Hall is in no danger of losing "the subtle Jury-droop and charming double-eyeglass," by which this sharp observer could convey a type of character in just a few words.
Of the other portions of the book that had a strong personal interest for him I have spoken on a former page, and I will now only add an allusion of his own. "There are some things in Flora in number seven that seem to me to be extraordinarily droll, with something serious at the bottom of them after all. Ah, well! was there not something very serious in it once? I am glad to think of being in the country with the long summer mornings as I approach number ten, where I have finally resolved to make Dorrit rich. It should be a very fine point in the story. . . . Nothing in Flora made me laugh so much as the confusion of ideas between gout flying upwards, and its soaring with Mr. F—— to another sphere." He had himself no inconsiderable enjoyment also of Mr. F.'s aunt; and in the old rascal of a patriarch, the smooth-surfaced Casby, and other surroundings of poor Flora, there was fun enough to float an argosy of second-rates, assuming such to have formed the staple of the tale. It would be far from fair to say they did. The defect in the book was less the absence of excellent character or keen observation, than the want of ease and coherence among the figures of the story, and of a central interest[161] in the plan of it. The agencies that bring about its catastrophe, too, are less agreeable even than in Bleak House; and, most unlike that well-constructed story, some of the most deeply considered things that occur in it have really little to do with the tale itself. The surface-painting of both Miss Wade and Tattycoram, to take an instance, is anything but attractive, yet there is under it a rare force of likeness in the unlikeness between the two which has much subtlety of intention; and they must both have had, as well as Mr. Gowan himself, a striking effect in the novel, if they had been made to contribute in a more essential way to its interest or development. The failure nevertheless had not been for want of care and study, as well of his own design as of models by masters in his art. A happier hint of apology, for example, could hardly be given for Fielding's introduction of such an episode as the Man of the Hill between the youth and manhood of Blifil and Tom Jones, than is suggested by what Dickens wrote of the least interesting part of Little Dorrit. In the mere form, Fielding of course was only following the lead of Cervantes and Le Sage; but Dickens rightly judged his purpose also to have been, to supply a kind of connection between the episode and the story. "I don't see the practicability of making the History of a Self-Tormentor, with which I took great pains, a written narrative. But I do see the possibility" (he saw the other practicability before the number was published) "of making it a chapter by itself, which might enable me to dispense with the necessity of the turned commas. Do you think that would be better? I have no doubt that a great part of[162] Fielding's reason for the introduced story, and Smollett's also, was, that it is sometimes really impossible to present, in a full book, the idea it contains (which yet it may be on all accounts desirable to present), without supposing the reader to be possessed of almost as much romantic allowance as would put him on a level with the writer. In Miss Wade I had an idea, which I thought a new one, of making the introduced story so fit into surroundings impossible of separation from the main story, as to make the blood of the book circulate through both. But I can only suppose, from what you say, that I have not exactly succeeded in this."
Of the other parts of the book that personally interested him, I mentioned on a previous page, and now I’ll just add a quote from him. “There are some things in Flora in number seven that I find incredibly funny, yet with something serious underneath. Ah, well! Was there not something very serious about it once? I’m happy thinking about being in the countryside with the long summer mornings as I get to number ten, where I’ve finally decided to make Dorrit wealthy. That should be a strong point in the story. Nothing in Flora made me laugh as much as the mix-up of ideas between gout flying up and it soaring with Mr. F—— to another realm.” He also found a fair amount of amusement in Mr. F.'s aunt, and in the old rascal of a patriarch, the smooth-surfaced Casby, along with the other characters surrounding poor Flora, there was enough humor to fill an entire ship of second-rate tales, assuming those made up the core of the story. It wouldn’t be fair to say they did. The flaw in the book was less about lacking great characters or sharp observations and more about the lack of ease and coherence among the characters in the story, as well as a central interest in its overall plan. The factors leading to its downfall are even less enjoyable than in Bleak House; unlike that well-structured story, some of the most thought-provoking things that happen in it don’t actually connect much with the tale itself. The superficial portrayal of both Miss Wade and Tattycoram, for example, is far from appealing, yet beneath it lies a unique contrast between the two that has a lot of subtle intention; they, along with Mr. Gowan himself, could have made a significant impact in the novel if they had played a more meaningful role in its interest or development. The failure, however, was not due to a lack of care and effort, both in his own design and modeling after masters in his craft. A better example of an apology could hardly be found than Fielding’s introduction of the Man of the Hill episode between the youth and adulthood of Blifil and Tom Jones, as hinted at by Dickens regarding the least interesting part of Little Dorrit. In terms of form, Fielding was clearly following Cervantes and Le Sage; however, Dickens rightly saw his aim was to create a sort of connection between the episode and the narrative. “I don’t see how I can turn the History of a Self-Tormentor, which I worked hard on, into a written narrative. But I do see the possibility” (he realized the other aspect before the number was published) “of making it a standalone chapter, which could allow me to avoid the necessity of the turned commas. Do you think that would be better? I have no doubt that part of Fielding's reason for the story inclusion, as well as Smollett's, was that it can sometimes be genuinely impossible to convey the idea in a complete book (which may be desirable to present) without expecting the reader to have almost as much romantic tolerance as would make them akin to the author. With Miss Wade, I had an idea, which I thought was new, of making the included story so entwined with the surroundings that it becomes impossible to separate it from the main story, making the life of the book flow through both. But I can only infer, from what you say, that I haven’t precisely succeeded in this.”
Shortly after the date of his letter he was in London on business connected with the purchase of Gadshill Place, and he went over to the Borough to see what traces were left of the prison of which his first impression was taken in his boyhood, which had played so important a part in this latest novel, and every brick and stone of which he had been able to rebuild in his book by the mere vividness of his marvellous memory. "Went to the Borough yesterday morning before going to Gadshill, to see if I could find any ruins of the Marshalsea. Found a great part of the original building—now 'Marshalsea Place.' Found the rooms that have been in my mind's eye in the story. Found, nursing a very big boy, a very small boy, who, seeing me standing on the Marshalsea pavement, looking about, told me how it all used to be. God knows how he learned it (for he was a world too young to know anything about it), but he was right enough. . . . There is a room there—still standing, to my amazement—that I think of taking! It is the room through which[163] the ever-memorable signers of Captain Porter's petition filed off in my boyhood. The spikes are gone, and the wall is lowered, and anybody can go out now who likes to go, and is not bedridden; and I said to the boy 'Who lives there?' and he said, 'Jack Pithick.' 'Who is Jack Pithick?' I asked him. And he said, 'Joe Pithick's uncle.'"
Shortly after he wrote the letter, he was in London for business related to buying Gadshill Place. He took a trip to the Borough to see what remained of the prison that had left a lasting impression on him during his childhood, which was a significant part of his latest novel. He could picture every brick and stone in his book thanks to his incredible memory. "I went to the Borough yesterday morning before heading to Gadshill to see if I could find any remnants of the Marshalsea. I found a large portion of the original building—now called 'Marshalsea Place.' I recognized the rooms that had been in my mind while writing the story. I also met a very small boy nursing a big boy. When he saw me standing on the Marshalsea pavement, looking around, he shared how things used to be. I have no idea how he knew all this (since he was way too young to have any real knowledge of it), but he was spot on. To my surprise, there’s still a room standing that I'm thinking of taking! It's the room where the unforgettable signers of Captain Porter's petition left from during my childhood. The spikes are gone, the wall is shorter now, and anyone can leave if they’re not bedridden. I asked the boy, ‘Who lives there?’ and he replied, ‘Jack Pithick.’ I inquired, ‘Who is Jack Pithick?’ and he said, ‘Joe Pithick's uncle.’”
Mention was made of this visit in the preface that appeared with the last number; and all it is necessary to add of the completed book will be, that, though in the humour and satire of its finer parts not unworthy of him, and though it had the clear design, worthy of him in an especial degree, of contrasting, both in private and in public life, and in poverty equally as in wealth, duty done and duty not done, it made no material addition to his reputation. His public, however, showed no falling-off in its enormous numbers; and what is said in one of his letters, noticeable for this touch of character, illustrates his anxiety to avoid any set-off from the disquiet that critical discourtesies might give. "I was ludicrously foiled here the other night in a resolution I have kept for twenty years not to know of any attack upon myself, by stumbling, before I could pick myself up, on a short extract in the Globe from Blackwood's Magazine, informing me that Little Dorrit is 'Twaddle.' I was sufficiently put out by it to be angry with myself for being such a fool, and then pleased with myself for having so long been constant to a good resolution." There was a scene that made itself part of history not four months after his death, which, if he could have lived to hear of it, might have more than consoled him. It was the[164] meeting of Bismarck and Jules Favre under the walls of Paris. The Prussian was waiting to open fire on the city; the Frenchman was engaged in the arduous task of showing the wisdom of not doing it; and "we learn," say the papers of the day, "that while the two eminent statesmen were trying to find a basis of negotiation, Von Moltke was seated in a corner reading Little Dorrit." Who will doubt that the chapter on How Not to do it was then absorbing the old soldier's attention?
Mention of this visit was made in the preface accompanying the last issue; and all that needs to be added about the finished book is that, while its humor and satire in the finer parts are quite worthy of him, and although it has a clear design—especially fitting for him—to contrast duty fulfilled and duty neglected in both private and public life, as well as in poverty and wealth, it did not significantly enhance his reputation. However, his audience showed no decline in its massive numbers; and what he mentions in one of his letters, notable for this insight into his character, highlights his worry about any backlash from the unease that critical slights might create. "I was humorously thwarted the other night in a resolution I have maintained for twenty years of not acknowledging any attack on myself when I stumbled, before I could regain my composure, on a short excerpt in the Globe from Blackwood's Magazine, informing me that Little Dorrit is 'Twaddle.' I was irritated enough by it to be mad at myself for being such a fool, and then pleased with myself for having remained true to a good resolution for so long." There was a moment etched into history less than four months after his death that, had he lived to hear about it, might have more than consoled him. It was the[164] meeting of Bismarck and Jules Favre under the walls of Paris. The Prussian was poised to attack the city; the Frenchman was in the tough position of arguing against it; and "we learn," say the newspapers of the time, "that while the two prominent statesmen were attempting to establish a basis for negotiation, Von Moltke was seated in a corner reading Little Dorrit." Who would doubt that the chapter on How to avoid doing it was captivating the old soldier's attention?
Preparations for the private play had gone on incessantly up to Christmas, and, in turning the school-room into a theatre, sawing and hammering worthy of Babel continued for weeks. The priceless help of Stanfield had again been secured, and I remember finding him one day at Tavistock House in the act of upsetting some elaborate arrangements by Dickens, with a proscenium before him made up of chairs, and the scenery planned out with walking-sticks. But Dickens's art in a matter of this kind was to know how to take advice; and no suggestion came to him that he was not ready to act upon, if it presented the remotest likelihood. In one of his great difficulties of obtaining more space, for audience as well as actors, he was told that Mr. Cooke of Astley's was a man of much resource in that way; and to Mr. Cooke he applied, with the following result. "One of the finest things" (18th of October 1856) "I have ever seen in my life of that kind was the arrival of my friend Mr. Cooke one morning this week, in an open phaeton drawn by two white ponies with black spots[165] all over them (evidently stencilled), who came in at the gate with a little jolt and a rattle, exactly as they come into the Ring when they draw anything, and went round and round the centre bed of the front court, apparently looking for the clown. A multitude of boys who felt them to be no common ponies rushed up in a breathless state—twined themselves like ivy about the railings—and were only deterred from storming the enclosure by the glare of the Inimitable's eye. Some of these boys had evidently followed from Astley's. I grieve to add that my friend, being taken to the point of difficulty, had no sort of suggestion in him; no gleam of an idea; and might just as well have been the popular minister from the Tabernacle in Tottenham Court Road. All he could say was—answering me, posed in the garden, precisely as if I were the clown asking him a riddle at night—that two of their stable tents would be home in November, and that they were '20 foot square,' and I was heartily welcome to 'em. Also, he said, 'You might have half a dozen of my trapezes, or my middle-distance-tables, but they're all 6 foot and all too low sir.' Since then, I have arranged to do it in my own way, and with my own carpenter. You will be surprised by the look of the place. It is no more like the school-room than it is like the sign of the Salutation Inn at Ambleside in Westmoreland. The sounds in the house remind me, as to the present time, of Chatham Dockyard—as to a remote epoch, of the building of Noah's ark. Joiners are never out of the house, and the carpenter appears to be unsettled (or settled) for life."
Preparations for the private play had been non-stop right up to Christmas, and the efforts to turn the schoolroom into a theater involved sawing and hammering worthy of Babel for weeks. The priceless help of Stanfield was secured once again, and I remember finding him one day at Tavistock House, messing up some elaborate arrangements made by Dickens, with a makeshift proscenium of chairs, and the scenery laid out with walking sticks. But Dickens’s skill in situations like this was knowing how to take advice; he was always ready to act on any suggestion that had even the slightest chance of helping. In one of his big challenges to create more space for both the audience and the actors, he was told that Mr. Cooke from Astley's was very resourceful in that area; so he turned to Mr. Cooke, with the following result. "One of the finest things" (October 18, 1856) "I have ever seen in my life of that kind was the arrival of my friend Mr. Cooke one morning this week, in an open carriage pulled by two white ponies with black spots all over them (clearly stenciled), who came through the gate with a little jolt and a rattle, just like they do when they arrive in the Ring, and went round and round the center bed of the front courtyard, seemingly looking for the clown. A bunch of boys, realizing these were no ordinary ponies, rushed over in excitement, wrapped themselves around the railings, and were only kept from storming the enclosure by the glare of the Inimitable's eye. Some of these boys had obviously followed from Astley's. I regret to say that my friend, when faced with the challenge, had no sort of suggestion; no spark of an idea; and he might as well have been the popular minister from the Tabernacle in Tottenham Court Road. All he could say, responding to me, standing in the garden as if I were the clown asking him a riddle at night, was that two of their stable tents would be available in November, and that they were '20 feet square,' and I was completely welcome to them. He also mentioned, 'You could have half a dozen of my trapezes, or my middle-distance tables, but they’re all 6 feet and too low for you.' Since then, I’ve decided to do it my own way, with my own carpenter. You’ll be surprised by how the place looks. It’s nothing like the schoolroom or the sign of the Salutation Inn in Ambleside, Westmoreland. The sounds in the house remind me, currently, of Chatham Dockyard—and at a distant time, of the building of Noah’s ark. Carpenters are always in the house, and the carpenter seems to be either unsettled or settled for life."
Of course time did not mend matters, and as Christmas[166] approached the house was in a state of siege. "All day long, a labourer heats size over the fire in a great crucible. We eat it, drink it, breathe it, and smell it. Seventy paint-pots (which came in a van) adorn the stage; and thereon may be beheld, Stanny, and three Dansons (from the Surrey Zoological Gardens), all painting at once!! Meanwhile, Telbin, in a secluded bower in Brewer-street, Golden-square, plies his part of the little undertaking." How worthily it turned out in the end, the excellence of the performances and the delight of the audiences, became known to all London; and the pressure for admittance at last took the form of a tragi-comedy, composed of ludicrous makeshifts and gloomy disappointments, with which even Dickens's resources could not deal. "My audience is now 93," he wrote one day in despair, "and at least 10 will neither hear nor see." There was nothing for it but to increase the number of nights; and it was not until the 20th of January he described "the workmen smashing the last atoms of the theatre."
Of course, time didn’t fix things, and as Christmas[166] approached, the house was under siege. "All day long, a worker heats glue over the fire in a large crucible. We eat it, drink it, breathe it, and smell it. Seventy paint pots (which arrived in a van) decorate the stage; and thereon you can see Stanny and three Dansons (from the Surrey Zoological Gardens), all painting at once!! Meanwhile, Telbin, in a hidden nook in Brewer Street, Golden Square, works on his part of the little undertaking." How well it turned out in the end, with the quality of the performances and the enjoyment of the audiences, became known throughout London. The demand for tickets eventually turned into a mix of comedy and tragedy, full of ridiculous makeshift solutions and disheartening letdowns, which even Dickens couldn't handle. "My audience is now 93," he wrote one day in frustration, "and at least 10 will neither hear nor see." There was no option but to extend the number of nights; and it wasn't until January 20th that he described "the workers smashing the last bits of the theatre."
His book was finished soon after at Gadshill Place, to be presently described, which he had purchased the previous year, and taken possession of in February; subscribing himself, in the letter announcing the fact, as "the Kentish Freeholder on his native heath, his name Protection."[209] The new abode occupied him in[167] various ways in the early part of the summer; and Hans Andersen the Dane had just arrived upon a visit to him there, when Douglas Jerrold's unexpected death befell. It was a shock to every one, and an especial grief to Dickens. Jerrold's wit, and the bright shrewd intellect that had so many triumphs, need no celebration from me; but the keenest of satirists was one of the kindliest of men, and Dickens had a fondness for Jerrold as genuine as his admiration for him. "I chance to know a good deal about the poor fellow's illness, for I was with him on the last day he was out. It was ten days ago, when we dined at a dinner given by Russell at Greenwich. He was complaining much when we met, said he had been sick three days, and attributed it to the inhaling of white paint from his study window. I did not think much of it at the moment, as we were very social; but while we walked through Leicester-square he suddenly fell into a white, hot, sick perspiration, and had to lean against the railings. Then, at my urgent request, he was to let me put him in a cab and send him home; but he rallied a little after that, and, on our meeting Russell, determined to come with us. We three went down by steamboat that we might see the great ship, and then got an open fly and rode about Blackheath: poor Jerrold mightily enjoying the air, and constantly saying that it set him up. He was rather quiet at dinner—sat next Delane—but was very humorous and good, and in spirits, though he took hardly anything. We parted with references to coming down here" (Gadshill) "and I never saw him again. Next morning he was taken very ill when he tried to get up. On[168] the Wednesday and Thursday he was very bad, but rallied on the Friday, and was quite confident of getting well. On the Sunday he was very ill again, and on the Monday forenoon died; 'at peace with all the world' he said, and asking to be remembered to friends. He had become indistinct and insensible, until for but a few minutes at the end. I knew nothing about it, except that he had been ill and was better, until, going up by railway yesterday morning, I heard a man in the carriage, unfolding his newspaper, say to another 'Douglas Jerrold is dead.' I immediately went up there, and then to Whitefriars . . . I propose that there shall be a night at a theatre when the actors (with old Cooke) shall play the Rent Day and Black-ey'd Susan; another night elsewhere, with a lecture from Thackeray; a day reading by me; a night reading by me; a lecture by Russell; and a subscription performance of the Frozen Deep, as at Tavistock House. I don't mean to do it beggingly; but merely to announce the whole series, the day after the funeral, 'In memory of the late Mr. Douglas Jerrold,' or some such phrase. I have got hold of Arthur Smith as the best man of business I know, and go to work with him to-morrow morning—inquiries being made in the meantime as to the likeliest places to be had for these various purposes. My confident hope is that we shall get close upon two thousand pounds."
His book was finished shortly after at Gadshill Place, which he had bought the previous year and moved into in February. In the letter announcing this, he referred to himself as "the Kentish Freeholder on his native heath, his name Protection."[209] During the early part of the summer, he was busy with his new home, and just as Hans Andersen the Dane had arrived for a visit, Douglas Jerrold's unexpected death occurred. It shocked everyone and was especially painful for Dickens. Jerrold's wit and sharp intellect, which had achieved so much, need no praise from me; but the sharpest of satirists was also one of the kindest of men, and Dickens had as much affection for Jerrold as he did admiration. "I happen to know a good deal about the poor fellow’s illness because I was with him on the last day he was out. It was ten days ago when we dined at a dinner hosted by Russell at Greenwich. He was complaining a lot when we met, mentioned he had been unwell for three days, and thought it was due to inhaling white paint from his study window. I didn’t think much of it at the time since we were having a good time, but while we were walking through Leicester Square, he suddenly broke into a hot, sick sweat and had to lean against the railings. At my insistence, he let me put him in a cab and send him home; but after that, he perked up a little, and when we saw Russell, he decided to join us. We three took a steamboat to see the big ship, then got a horse-drawn cab to ride around Blackheath: poor Jerrold really enjoyed the fresh air and kept saying it made him feel better. He was a bit quiet at dinner—sat next to Delane—but was funny and in good spirits, although he hardly ate anything. We parted with plans to come down here (Gadshill), and I never saw him again. The next morning, he fell very ill when he tried to get up. On Wednesday and Thursday, he was quite unwell, but he improved on Friday and was feeling hopeful about getting better. By Sunday, he was quite ill again, and on Monday morning, he passed away. 'At peace with all the world,' he said, asking to be remembered to friends. He had become vague and unresponsive, until the last few minutes. I had no idea what was going on, only that he had been sick and was getting better, until yesterday morning when I was taking the train up and overheard a man in the carriage saying to another, 'Douglas Jerrold is dead.' I immediately went there and then to Whitefriars . . . I plan to organize a night at a theater where the actors (with old Cooke) will perform Rent Day and Black-eyed Susan; another night elsewhere with a lecture from Thackeray; a day reading by me; a night reading by me; a lecture by Russell; and a subscription performance of The Frozen Deep, like at Tavistock House. I don't intend to do this in a begging way; I just want to announce the whole series, the day after the funeral, 'In memory of the late Mr. Douglas Jerrold,' or something similar. I've enlisted Arthur Smith as the best businessperson I know, and I'll start working with him tomorrow morning—meanwhile, inquiries will be made about the best places for these various events. My confident hope is that we will raise nearly two thousand pounds."
The friendly enterprise was carried to the close with a vigour, promptitude, and success, that well corresponded with this opening. In addition to the performances named, there were others in the country also organized by Dickens, in which he took active personal[169] part; and the result did not fall short of his expectations. The sum was invested ultimately for our friend's unmarried daughter, who still receives the income from myself, the last surviving trustee.
The friendly venture was wrapped up with a level of energy, speed, and success that matched this beginning. Besides the events mentioned, there were others in the country also organized by Dickens, where he played an active role; and the outcome met his expectations. The total amount was eventually invested for our friend's unmarried daughter, who still receives the income from me, the last surviving trustee.[169]
So passed the greater part of the summer,[210] and when the country performances were over at the end of August I had this intimation. "I have arranged with Collins that he and I will start next Monday on a ten[170] or twelve days' expedition to out-of-the-way places, to do (in inns and coast-corners) a little tour in search of an article and in avoidance of railroads. I must get a good name for it, and I propose it in five articles, one for the beginning of every number in the October part." Next day: "Our decision is for a foray upon the fells of Cumberland; I having discovered in the books some promising moors and bleak places thereabout." Into the lake-country they went accordingly; and The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices, contributed to Household Words, was a narrative of the trip. But his letters had descriptive touches, and some whimsical personal experiences, not in the published account.
So most of the summer went by,[210] and when the country performances wrapped up at the end of August, I got this notification. "I've worked it out with Collins that we’ll set off next Monday on a ten or twelve-day trip to some remote spots, staying in inns and by the coast, to do a little tour for an article while avoiding trains. I need a catchy title for it, and I’m planning to split it into five articles, one for the start of each issue in the October edition." The next day: "We’ve decided to venture into the fells of Cumberland; I found some promising moors and remote areas in the books." So they headed into the lake-country; and The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices, which was published in Household Words, recounted the journey. But his letters included some vivid descriptions and quirky personal experiences not found in the published version.
Looking over the Beauties of England and Wales before he left London, his ambition was fired by mention of Carrick Fell, "a gloomy old mountain 1500 feet high," which he secretly resolved to go up. "We came straight to it yesterday" (9th of September). "Nobody goes up. Guides have forgotten it. Master of a little inn, excellent north-countryman, volunteered. Went up, in a tremendous rain. C. D. beat Mr. Porter (name of landlord) in half a mile. Mr. P. done up in no time. Three nevertheless went on. Mr. P. again leading; C. D. and C." (Mr. Wilkie Collins) "following. Rain terrific, black mists, darkness of night. Mr. P. agitated. C. D. confident. C. (a long way down in perspective) submissive. All wet through. No poles. Not so much as a walking-stick in the party. Reach the summit, at about one in the day. Dead darkness as of night. Mr. P. (excellent fellow to the last) uneasy. C. D. produces compass from pocket. Mr. P. reassured. Farm-house where dog-cart was left,[171] N.N.W. Mr. P. complimentary. Descent commenced. C. D. with compass triumphant, until compass, with the heat and wet of C. D.'s pocket, breaks. Mr. P. (who never had a compass), inconsolable, confesses he has not been on Carrick Fell for twenty years, and he don't know the way down. Darker and darker. Nobody discernible, two yards off, by the other two. Mr. P. makes suggestions, but no way. It becomes clear to C. D. and to C. that Mr. P. is going round and round the mountain, and never coming down. Mr. P. sits on angular granite, and says he is 'just fairly doon.' C. D. revives Mr. P. with laughter, the only restorative in the company. Mr. P. again complimentary. Descent tried once more. Mr. P. worse and worse. Council of war. Proposals from C. D. to go 'slap down.' Seconded by C. Mr. P. objects, on account of precipice called The Black Arches, and terror of the country-side. More wandering. Mr. P. terror-stricken, but game. Watercourse, thundering and roaring, reached. C. D. suggests that it must run to the river, and had best be followed, subject to all gymnastic hazards. Mr. P. opposes, but gives in. Watercourse followed accordingly. Leaps, splashes, and tumbles, for two hours. C. lost. C. D. whoops. Cries for assistance from behind. C. D. returns. C. with horribly sprained ankle, lying in rivulet!"
Looking over the Beauties of England and Wales before he left London, he was inspired by a mention of Carrick Fell, "a gloomy old mountain 1500 feet high," which he secretly vowed to climb. "We went straight to it yesterday" (September 9th). "No one climbs it. Guides have forgotten it. The owner of a small inn, a great north-countryman, offered to help. We went up, in heavy rain. C. D. outpaced Mr. Porter (the landlord) in half a mile. Mr. P. was worn out quickly. Still, three of us continued. Mr. P. led again, with C. D. and C. (Mr. Wilkie Collins) following. The rain was pouring, with thick black mist and darkness like night. Mr. P. was anxious. C. D. was sure of himself. C. (far behind) was resigned. We were all soaked. No poles. Not even a walking stick in the group. We reached the summit around one in the afternoon. It was pitch black as if it were night. Mr. P. (a great guy until the end) was uneasy. C. D. took a compass out of his pocket. Mr. P. felt reassured. The farmhouse where we left the dog-cart was N.N.W. Mr. P. was flattering. We began our descent. C. D. was triumphant with the compass, until it broke from the heat and damp of his pocket. Mr. P. (who didn't have a compass), was distraught and admitted he hadn't been to Carrick Fell in twenty years, so he didn't know the way down. It got darker and darker. No one could see even two yards away from the other two. Mr. P. suggested ways to go, but none worked. C. D. and C. quickly realized that Mr. P. was just going in circles around the mountain, not actually descending. Mr. P. sat on a jagged rock, saying he was 'just fairly done.' C. D. cheered Mr. P. up with laughter, the only thing that could revive him. Mr. P. complimented him again. We tried to descend once more. Mr. P. was getting worse. A strategy meeting was held. C. D. proposed going 'straight down.' C. seconded it. Mr. P. objected because of a cliff known as The Black Arches, which scared the locals. More wandering around. Mr. P. was terrified but determined. We reached a rushing watercourse. C. D. suggested we follow it to the river, despite all the physical challenges it might bring. Mr. P. disagreed but ultimately accepted. We followed the watercourse. We leaped, splashed, and stumbled for two hours. C. got lost. C. D. shouted. He called for help from behind. C. D. came back. C. was lying in a stream with a badly sprained ankle!
All the danger was over when Dickens sent his description; but great had been the trouble in binding up the sufferer's ankle and getting him painfully on, shoving, shouldering, carrying alternately, till terra firma was reached. "We got down at last in the wildest place, preposterously out of the course; and,[172] propping up C. against stones, sent Mr. P. to the other side of Cumberland for dog-cart, so got back to his inn, and changed. Shoe or stocking on the bad foot, out of the question. Foot tumbled up in a flannel waistcoat. C. D. carrying C. melo-dramatically (Wardour to the life!)[211] everywhere; into and out of carriages; up and down stairs; to bed; every step. And so to Wigton, got doctor, and here we are!! A pretty business, we flatter ourselves!"
All the danger was behind us when Dickens wrote his description; but it had been quite a struggle to wrap up the injured person's ankle and get him moving painfully, pushing, shouldering, and carrying him back to solid ground. "We finally settled down in the wildest spot, completely off course; and, [172] propping C. against some rocks, sent Mr. P. across Cumberland for a dog cart, which got us back to his inn, where he changed. Wearing a shoe or stocking on the injured foot was out of the question. The foot was bundled up in a flannel waistcoat. C. D. was dramatically carrying C. (just like in the movies!)[211] everywhere; in and out of carriages; up and down stairs; to bed; every single step. And then we made it to Wigton, got a doctor, and here we are!! Quite the ordeal, we like to think!"
Wigton, Dickens described as a place of little houses all in half-mourning, yellow stone or white stone and black, with the wonderful peculiarity that though it had no population, no business, and no streets to speak of, it had five linendrapers within range of their single window, one linendraper's next door, and five more linendrapers round the corner. "I ordered a night light in my bed-room. A queer little old woman brought me one of the common Child's night lights, and, seeming to think that I looked at it with interest, said, 'It's joost a vara keeyourious thing, sir, and joost new coom oop. It'll burn awt hoors a' end, and no gootther, nor no waste, nor ony sike a thing, if you can creedit what I say, seein' the airticle.'" In these primitive quarters there befell a difficulty about letters, which Dickens solved in a fashion especially his own. "The day after Carrick there was a mess about our letters, through our not going to a place called Mayport. So, while the landlord was planning how to get[173] them (they were only twelve miles off), I walked off, to his great astonishment, and brought them over." The night after leaving Wigton they were at the Ship-hotel in Allonby.
Wigton, as Dickens described, was a place filled with small houses, all in a mix of half-mourning colors, like yellow or white stone and black. It had the strange fact that despite having no residents, no businesses, and no notable streets, it had five linen shops within sight of a single window, one shop right next door, and five more just around the corner. "I asked for a nightlight in my bedroom. A strange little old woman brought me one of those ordinary child’s nightlights, and seeing that I was looking at it with curiosity, she said, 'It’s just a very curious thing, sir, and just new come up. It’ll burn all hours on end, and no goodether, nor any waste, or anything like that, if you can believe what I say, considering the article.'" In these basic surroundings, an issue arose regarding letters, which Dickens resolved in his own unique way. "The day after Carrick, there was confusion about our letters because we hadn’t gone to a place called Mayport. So, while the landlord was figuring out how to get[173] them (they were only twelve miles away), I walked off, much to his surprise, and brought them back." The night after leaving Wigton, they stayed at the Ship Hotel in Allonby.
Allonby his letters presented as a small untidy outlandish place; rough stone houses in half mourning, a few coarse yellow-stone lodging houses with black roofs (bills in all the windows), five bathing-machines, five girls in straw hats, five men in straw hats (wishing they had not come); very much what Broadstairs would have been if it had been born Irish, and had not inherited a cliff. "But this is a capital little homely inn, looking out upon the sea; with the coast of Scotland, mountainous and romantic, over against the windows; and though I can just stand upright in my bedroom, we are really well lodged. It is a clean nice place in a rough wild country, and we have a very obliging and comfortable landlady." He had found indeed, in the latter, an acquaintance of old date. "The landlady at the little inn at Allonby, lived at Greta-Bridge in Yorkshire when I went down there before Nickleby; and was smuggled into the room to see me, after I was secretly found out. She is an immensely fat woman now. 'But I could tuck my arm round her waist then, Mr. Dickens,' the landlord said when she told me the story as I was going to bed the night before last. 'And can't you do it now?' I said. 'You insensible dog! Look at me! Here's a picture!' Accordingly I got round as much of her as I could; and this gallant action was the most successful I have ever performed, on the whole."
Allonby was portrayed in his letters as a small, messy, quirky place; rough stone houses in muted colors, a few basic yellow-stone lodging houses with black roofs (bills in all the windows), five bathing machines, five girls in straw hats, and five men in straw hats (wishing they hadn’t come). It was pretty much what Broadstairs would have been if it had been Irish and hadn’t inherited a cliff. "But this is a lovely little inn overlooking the sea, with the hilly and picturesque coast of Scotland right across from the windows; and even though I can barely stand up in my bedroom, we’re really well accommodated. It’s a clean, nice place in a rugged, wild area, and our landlady is very accommodating and friendly." He had, in fact, found an old acquaintance in her. "The landlady at the little inn in Allonby lived in Greta-Bridge in Yorkshire when I visited there before Nickleby; and she was sneaked into the room to see me after I was secretly discovered. She’s an extremely heavy woman now. 'But I could wrap my arm around her waist back then, Mr. Dickens,' the landlord said when she told me the story as I was going to bed the night before last. 'And can’t you do that now?' I asked. 'You heartless dog! Look at me! Here’s the evidence!' So, of course, I got around as much of her as I could; and this daring act was the most successful I’ve ever accomplished overall."
On their way home the friends were at Doncaster,[174] and this was Dickens's first experience of the St. Leger and its saturnalia. His companion had by this time so far recovered as to be able, doubled-up, to walk with a thick stick; in which condition, "being exactly like the gouty admiral in a comedy I have given him that name." The impressions received from the race-week were not favourable. It was noise and turmoil all day long, and a gathering of vagabonds from all parts of the racing earth. Every bad face that had ever caught wickedness from an innocent horse had its representative in the streets; and as Dickens, like Gulliver looking down upon his fellow-men after coming from the horse-country, looked down into Doncaster High-street from his inn-window, he seemed to see everywhere a then notorious personage who had just poisoned his betting-companion. "Everywhere I see the late Mr. Palmer with his betting-book in his hand. Mr. Palmer sits next me at the theatre; Mr. Palmer goes before me down the street; Mr. Palmer follows me into the chemist's shop where I go to buy rose water after breakfast, and says to the chemist 'Give us soom sal volatile or soom damned thing o' that soort, in wather—my head's bad!' And I look at the back of his bad head repeated in long, long lines on the race course, and in the betting stand and outside the betting rooms in the town, and I vow to God that I can see nothing in it but cruelty, covetousness, calculation, insensibility, and low wickedness."
On their way home, the friends stopped in Doncaster,[174] and this was Dickens's first experience of the St. Leger and its wild festivities. By this time, his companion had recovered enough to walk, bent over, with a thick stick; in this state, "he looked just like the gouty admiral in a comedy, so I've given him that name." The impressions from race week were not positive. It was noisy and chaotic all day, filled with a crowd of drifters from all corners of the racing world. Every shady character that had ever pulled a fast one involving an innocent horse could be found in the streets; and as Dickens, like Gulliver peering down at his fellow humans after leaving horse country, looked out over Doncaster High Street from his hotel window, he felt he could see everywhere a notorious figure known for just having poisoned his betting partner. "Everywhere I see the late Mr. Palmer with his betting book in hand. Mr. Palmer sits next to me at the theater; Mr. Palmer walks ahead of me down the street; Mr. Palmer follows me into the chemist's shop where I go to buy rose water after breakfast and says to the chemist, 'Give me some sal volatile or some damned thing like that, in water—my head's killing me!' And I see the back of his bad head repeated in endless lines on the race course, in the betting stand and outside the betting rooms in the town, and I swear that all I see in it is cruelty, greed, calculation, indifference, and low wickedness."
Even a half-appalling kind of luck was not absent from my friend's experiences at the race course, when, what he called a "wonderful, paralysing, coincidence" befell him. He bought the card; facetiously wrote[175] down three names for the winners of the three chief races (never in his life having heard or thought of any of the horses, except that the winner of the Derby, who proved to be nowhere, had been mentioned to him); "and, if you can believe it without your hair standing on end, those three races were won, one after another, by those three horses!!!" That was the St. Leger-day, of which he also thought it noticeable, that, though the losses were enormous, nobody had won, for there was nothing but grinding of teeth and blaspheming of ill-luck. Nor had matters mended on the Cup-day, after which celebration "a groaning phantom" lay in the doorway of his bed-room and howled all night. The landlord came up in the morning to apologise, "and said it was a gentleman who had lost £1500 or £2000; and he had drunk a deal afterwards; and then they put him to bed, and then he—took the 'orrors, and got up, and yelled till morning."[176][212] Dickens might well believe, as he declared at the end of his letter, that if a boy with any good in him, but with a dawning propensity to sporting and betting, were but brought to the Doncaster races soon enough, it would cure him.
Even a somewhat terrible kind of luck wasn't missing from my friend's experiences at the racetrack, when he encountered what he called a "wonderful, paralyzing coincidence." He bought a ticket and jokingly wrote down three names for the winners of the three main races (having never before heard of or thought about any of the horses, except that the Derby winner, who turned out to be a non-entity, had been mentioned to him); "and, if you can believe it without your hair standing on end, those three races were won, one after another, by those three horses!!!" That was St. Leger-day, and he also found it notable that, even though the losses were huge, nobody won, as all there was to hear were grinding teeth and curses about bad luck. Things didn't get any better on Cup-day, after which a "groaning phantom" lay in the doorway of his bedroom and howled all night. The landlord came up in the morning to apologize, "and said it was a gentleman who lost £1500 or £2000; and he had drunk heavily afterwards; and then they put him to bed, and then he—had a fit, got up, and yelled until morning."[176][212] Dickens might well believe, as he declared at the end of his letter, that if a boy with any goodness in him, but with a budding tendency towards sports and betting, were just brought to the Doncaster races soon enough, it would straighten him out.
CHAPTER VII.
WHAT HAPPENED AT THIS TIME.
1857-1858.
An unsettled feeling greatly in excess of what was usual with Dickens, more or less observable since his first residence at Boulogne, became at this time almost habitual, and the satisfactions which home should have supplied, and which indeed were essential requirements of his nature, he had failed to find in his home. He had not the alternative that under this disappointment some can discover in what is called society. It did not suit him, and he set no store by it. No man was better fitted to adorn any circle he entered, but beyond that of friends and equals he rarely passed. He would take as much pains to keep out of the houses of the great as others take to get into them. Not always wisely, it may be admitted. Mere contempt for toadyism and flunkeyism was not at all times the prevailing[178] motive with him which he supposed it to be. Beneath his horror of those vices of Englishmen in his own rank of life, there was a still stronger resentment at the social inequalities that engender them, of which he was not so conscious and to which he owned less freely. Not the less it served secretly to justify what he might otherwise have had no mind to. To say he was not a gentleman would be as true as to say he was not a writer; but if any one should assert his occasional preference for what was even beneath his level over that which was above it, this would be difficult of disproof. It was among those defects of temperament for which his early trials and his early successes were accountable in perhaps equal measure. He was sensitive in a passionate degree to praise and blame, which yet he made it for the most part a point of pride to assume indifference to; the inequalities of rank which he secretly resented took more galling as well as glaring prominence from the contrast of the necessities he had gone through with the fame that had come to him; and when the forces he most affected to despise assumed the form of barriers he could not easily overleap, he was led to appear frequently intolerant (for he very seldom was really so) in opinions and language. His early sufferings brought with them the healing powers of energy, will, and persistence, and taught him the inexpressible value of a determined resolve to live down difficulties; but the habit, in small as in great things, of renunciation and self-sacrifice, they did not teach; and, by his sudden leap into a world-wide popularity and influence, he became master of everything that might seem to be attainable in life, before he had[179] mastered what a man must undergo to be equal to its hardest trials.
A feeling of unease that was much stronger than usual for Dickens, noticeable since his first stay in Boulogne, became almost a habit at this time. The comforts that home should have provided and which were vital to his nature were missing. He didn’t have the option that some find in what’s known as society. It didn't suit him, and he didn’t value it. No one was better suited to shine in any group he joined, but he rarely ventured beyond friends and peers. He would go to great lengths to avoid the homes of the elite just as others strive to gain entry. It can be said he didn’t always make wise choices in this regard. His disdain for sycophancy wasn’t always the main reason he believed it to be. Underneath his disdain for those vices of the English upper class, there was a stronger resentment toward the social inequalities that led to them, which he was less aware of and admitted to less freely. Nevertheless, it secretly justified behaviors he might not have otherwise considered. To claim he was not a gentleman would be as accurate as saying he was not a writer; however, if one argued that he sometimes preferred those beneath him over those above him, it would be hard to disprove. This was among those temperament flaws shaped equally by his early struggles and successes. He was intensely sensitive to praise and criticism, although he often took pride in acting indifferent. The social inequalities he resented were made even more painful by the contrast between his hardships and the fame he achieved. When the forces he pretended to look down upon became barriers he couldn't easily cross, he often came off as intolerant in his opinions and words, though he was rarely truly so. His early hardships brought him the healing powers of energy, determination, and persistence, teaching him the invaluable lesson of keeping a strong resolve to overcome challenges. However, they didn’t teach him the habit of renunciation and self-sacrifice, and by suddenly rising to global fame and influence, he gained control over everything that seemed attainable in life before he learned what one must endure to be ready for its toughest trials.
Nothing of all this has yet presented itself to notice, except in occasional forms of restlessness and desire of change of place, which were themselves, when his books were in progress, so incident as well to the active requirements of his fancy as to call, thus far, for no other explanation. Up to the date of the completion of Copperfield he had felt himself to be in possession of an all-sufficient resource. Against whatever might befall he had a set-off in his imaginative creations, a compensation derived from his art that never failed him, because there he was supreme. It was the world he could bend to his will, and make subserve to all his desires. He had otherwise, underneath his exterior of a singular precision, method, and strictly orderly arrangement in all things, and notwithstanding a temperament to which home and home interests were really a necessity, something in common with those eager, impetuous, somewhat overbearing natures, that rush at existence without heeding the cost of it, and are not more ready to accept and make the most of its enjoyments than to be easily and quickly overthrown by its burdens.[213] But the world he had called into[180] being had thus far borne him safely through these perils. He had his own creations always by his side. They were living, speaking companions. With them only he was everywhere thoroughly identified. He laughed and wept with them; was as much elated by their fun as cast down by their grief; and brought to the consideration of them a belief in their reality as well as in the influences they were meant to exercise, which in every circumstance sustained him.
Nothing of all this has really caught his attention yet, except for occasional feelings of restlessness and a desire to change his surroundings, which were simply part of the creative process when he was writing. Up until he finished Copperfield, he felt like he had all the resources he needed. No matter what happened, he could rely on his imaginative creations to provide him with something worthwhile; his art was a constant source of fulfillment because that was where he truly excelled. It was a world he could shape to meet his needs and fulfill his desires. Beneath his outward appearance of precise method and orderly organization, and despite having a temperament that genuinely needed the comforts of home, he shared some traits with those eager, impulsive, somewhat overbearing people who plunge into life without considering the consequences. They aren't just quick to embrace life’s pleasures; they can also be easily and swiftly overwhelmed by its burdens. But so far, the world he had conjured up had guided him safely through these challenges. His creations were always there with him. They were lively, engaging companions. With them, he felt completely connected. He laughed and cried alongside them; their humor lifted him up, and their sorrow brought him down. He approached them with a belief in their reality and the impacts they were meant to have, which always helped him in every situation.
It was during the composition of Little Dorrit that I think he first felt a certain strain upon his invention which brought with it other misgivings. In a modified form this was present during the latter portions of Bleak House, of which not a few of the defects might be traced to the acting excitements amid which it was written; but the succeeding book made it plainer to him; and it is remarkable that in the interval between them he resorted for the first and only time in his life to a practice, which he abandoned at the close of his next and last story published in the twenty-number form, of putting down written "Memoranda" of suggestions for characters or incidents by way of resource to him in his writing. Never before had his teeming fancy seemed to want such help; the need being less to contribute to its fullness than to check its overflowing;[181] but it is another proof that he had been secretly bringing before himself, at least, the possibility that what had ever been his great support might some day desert him. It was strange that he should have had such doubt, and he would hardly have confessed it openly; but apart from that wonderful world of his books, the range of his thoughts was not always proportioned to the width and largeness of his nature. His ordinary circle of activity, whether in likings or thinkings, was full of such surprising animation, that one was apt to believe it more comprehensive than it really was; and again and again, when a wide horizon might seem to be ahead of him, he would pull up suddenly and stop short, as though nothing lay beyond. For the time, though each had its term and change, he was very much a man of one idea, each having its turn of absolute predominance; and this was one of the secrets of the thoroughness with which everything he took in hand was done. As to the matter of his writings, the actual truth was that his creative genius never really failed him. Not a few of his inventions of character and humour, up to the very close of his life, his Marigolds, Lirripers, Gargerys, Pips, Sapseas and many others, were as fresh and fine as in his greatest day. He had however lost the free and fertile method of the earlier time. He could no longer fill a wide-spread canvas with the same facility and certainty as of old; and he had frequently a quite unfounded apprehension of some possible break-down, of which the end might be at any moment beginning. There came accordingly, from time to time, intervals of unusual impatience and restlessness, strange to me in[182] connection with his home; his old pursuits were too often laid aside for other excitements and occupations; he joined a public political agitation, set on foot by administrative reformers; he got up various quasi-public private theatricals, in which he took the leading place; and though it was but part of his always generous devotion in any friendly duty to organize the series of performances on his friend Jerrold's death, yet the eagerness with which he flung himself into them, so arranging them as to assume an amount of labour in acting and travelling that might have appalled an experienced comedian, and carrying them on week after week unceasingly in London and the provinces, expressed but the craving which still had possession of him to get by some means at some change that should make existence easier. What was highest in his nature had ceased for the time to be highest in his life, and he had put himself at the mercy of lower accidents and conditions. The mere effect of the strolling wandering ways into which this acting led him could not be other than unfavourable. But remonstrance as yet was unavailing.
It was while he was writing Little Dorrit that I think he first felt a certain pressure on his creativity, accompanied by other doubts. This was somewhat present during the later parts of Bleak House, many of its flaws can be traced back to the intense emotions during its creation; however, the next book made this clearer to him. It's noteworthy that in the time between the two, he resorted for the first and only time in his life to a practice he abandoned at the end of his next and last story published in twenty parts, of jotting down written "Memoranda" of ideas for characters or events as a resource for his writing. His overflowing imagination had never seemed to need such assistance before; it was less about adding to its richness and more about controlling its excesses; [181] yet this shows he was secretly considering the possibility that what had always been his greatest strength might one day let him down. It was unusual for him to have such doubts, and he would hardly admit it openly; but aside from the incredible world of his books, the scope of his thoughts didn't always match the vastness of his nature. His usual range of activities, whether in his interests or ideas, was so surprisingly lively that it was easy to believe it was broader than it actually was; and again and again, when a broad horizon seemed just ahead, he would suddenly pull back and stop, as if nothing lay beyond. For that time, although each had its period and change, he was very much a man of one idea at a time, each taking its turn in total dominance; and this was one of the secrets behind his meticulous approach to everything he took on. As for his writings, the truth was that his creative genius never truly failed him. Many of his characters and humorous inventions, well into his later years, like his Marigolds, Lirripers, Gargerys, Pips, Sapseas, and many others, remained as fresh and impressive as in his prime. However, he had lost the free and fertile style of his earlier period. He could no longer fill a broad canvas with the same ease and confidence as before, and he often had entirely unfounded fears of some potential collapse, as if the end could begin at any moment. Therefore, there were, from time to time, periods of unusual impatience and restlessness, puzzling to me in [182] relation to his home; his old hobbies were too often replaced by new distractions and tasks; he became involved in a public political movement started by reformers; he organized various semi-public private performances, taking the leading role; and while it was just part of his always generous commitment to any friendly obligation to arrange the series of performances following his friend Jerrold's death, the enthusiasm with which he threw himself into them—organizing them to the extent that it required a level of effort in acting and traveling that would have daunted a seasoned performer, and carrying them on week after week tirelessly in London and beyond—expressed the desperate need he still felt for some change that might make life easier. What was best in his nature had, for the time being, ceased to be the best part of his life, and he had allowed himself to be swayed by lower circumstances. The mere effects of the wandering paths this acting led him down could only be detrimental. But objections so far were useless.
To one very earnestly made in the early autumn of 1857, in which opportunity was taken to compare his recent rush up Carrick Fell to his rush into other difficulties, here was the reply. "Too late to say, put the curb on, and don't rush at hills—the wrong man to say it to. I have now no relief but in action. I am become incapable of rest. I am quite confident I should rust, break, and die, if I spared myself. Much better to die, doing. What I am in that way, nature made me first, and my way of life has of late, alas! confirmed.[183] I must accept the drawback—since it is one—with the powers I have; and I must hold upon the tenure prescribed to me." Something of the same sad feeling, it is right to say, had been expressed from time to time, in connection also with home dissatisfactions and misgivings, through the three years preceding; but I attributed it to other causes, and gave little attention to it. During his absences abroad for the greater part of 1854, '55, and '56, while the elder of his children were growing out of childhood, and his books were less easy to him than in his earlier manhood, evidences presented themselves in his letters of the old "unhappy loss or want of something" to which he had given a pervading prominence in Copperfield. In the first of those years he made express allusion to the kind of experience which had been one of his descriptions in that favourite book, and, mentioning the drawbacks of his present life, had first identified it with his own: "the so happy and yet so unhappy existence which seeks its realities in unrealities, and finds its dangerous comfort in a perpetual escape from the disappointment of heart around it."
To one very sincerely expressed in early autumn of 1857, where he took the chance to compare his recent rush up Carrick Fell to his rush into other challenges, here was the reply. "It's too late to say, slow down, and don't run at hills—the wrong person to say it to. I now find no relief except in action. I can't rest anymore. I'm really confident that I would rust, break, and die if I took it easy. Much better to die doing. What I am in that way, nature made me, and my lifestyle has sadly confirmed it lately. I must accept the drawback—since it is one—with the abilities I have; and I must stick to the path set out for me." It's important to note that a similar sad feeling had been expressed now and then, also in relation to home disappointments and doubts, over the three years leading up to this; but I attributed it to other reasons and paid little attention to it. During his long absences abroad in 1854, '55, and '56, while his older children were transitioning out of childhood and his writing was less effortless than in his younger years, signs of the old "unhappy loss or lack of something" that he had highlighted in Copperfield appeared in his letters. In the first of those years, he made a clear reference to the kind of experience that had been one of his descriptions in that beloved book, and while mentioning the challenges of his current life, he first connected it with his own: "the so happy and yet so unhappy existence which seeks its realities in unrealities, and finds its dangerous comfort in a perpetual escape from the disappointment of heart around it."[183]
Later in the same year he thus wrote from Boulogne: "I have had dreadful thoughts of getting away somewhere altogether by myself. If I could have managed it, I think possibly I might have gone to the Pyreennees (you know what I mean that word for, so I won't re-write it) for six months! I have put the idea into the perspective of six months, but have not abandoned it. I have visions of living for half a year or so, in all sorts of inaccessible places, and opening a new book therein. A floating idea of going up above the snow-line[184] in Switzerland, and living in some astonishing convent, hovers about me. If Household Words could be got into a good train, in short, I don't know in what strange place, or at what remote elevation above the level of the sea, I might fall to work next. Restlessness, you will say. Whatever it is, it is always driving me, and I cannot help it. I have rested nine or ten weeks, and sometimes feel as if it had been a year—though I had the strangest nervous miseries before I stopped. If I couldn't walk fast and far, I should just explode and perish." Again, four months later he wrote: "You will hear of me in Paris, probably next Sunday, and I may go on to Bordeaux. Have general ideas of emigrating in the summer to the mountain-ground between France and Spain. Am altogether in a dishevelled state of mind—motes of new books in the dirty air, miseries of older growth threatening to close upon me. Why is it, that as with poor David, a sense comes always crushing on me now, when I fall into low spirits, as of one happiness I have missed in life, and one friend and companion I have never made?"
Later that year, he wrote from Boulogne: "I’ve been having terrible thoughts about getting away somewhere all by myself. If I could manage it, I might have gone to the Pyrenees (you know what I mean by that, so I won’t explain) for six months! I’ve framed the idea in six-month terms, but I haven’t given it up. I picture myself living for about six months in all sorts of remote places and starting a new chapter there. A lingering thought of going above the snow line in Switzerland and living in some amazing convent sticks with me. If Household Words could get back on track, honestly, I have no idea what odd place or what crazy altitude above sea level I might end up working next. You’ll probably say it’s restlessness. Whatever it is, it keeps pushing me, and I can’t help it. I’ve rested for nine or ten weeks, and sometimes it feels like a year—although I had the strangest nervous troubles before I stopped. If I couldn’t walk fast and far, I’d just explode and disappear." Four months later he wrote again: "You’ll probably hear from me in Paris next Sunday, and I might go on to Bordeaux. I’m generally thinking about moving this summer to the mountains between France and Spain. I’m completely in a messy state of mind—bits of new books hanging in the air, old worries threatening to close in on me. Why is it that, like poor David, there’s always this crushing feeling when I’m down, as if there’s one happiness I’ve missed in life, and one friend and companion I’ve never had?"
Early in 1856 (20th of January) the notion revisited him of writing a book in solitude. "Again I am beset by my former notions of a book whereof the whole story shall be on the top of the Great St. Bernard. As I accept and reject ideas for Little Dorrit, it perpetually comes back to me. Two or three years hence, perhaps you'll find me living with the Monks and the Dogs a whole winter—among the blinding snows that fall about that monastery. I have a serious idea that I shall do it, if I live." He was at this date in Paris;[185] and during the visit to him of Macready in the following April, the self-revelations were resumed. The great actor was then living in retirement at Sherborne, to which he had gone on quitting the stage; and Dickens gave favourable report of his enjoyment of the change to his little holiday at Paris. Then, after recurring to his own old notion of having some slight idea of going to settle in Australia, only he could not do it until he should have finished Little Dorrit, he went on to say that perhaps Macready, if he could get into harness again, would not be the worse for some such troubles as were worrying himself. "It fills me with pity to think of him away in that lonely Sherborne place. I have always felt of myself that I must, please God, die in harness, but I have never felt it more strongly than in looking at, and thinking of, him. However strange it is to be never at rest, and never satisfied, and ever trying after something that is never reached, and to be always laden with plot and plan and care and worry, how clear it is that it must be, and that one is driven by an irresistible might until the journey is worked out! It is much better to go on and fret, than to stop and fret. As to repose—for some men there's no such thing in this life. The foregoing has the appearance of a small sermon; but it is so often in my head in these days that it cannot help coming out. The old days—the old days! Shall I ever, I wonder, get the frame of mind back as it used to be then? Something of it perhaps—but never quite as it used to be. I find that the skeleton in my domestic closet is becoming a pretty big one."
Early in 1856 (January 20th), he found himself thinking again about writing a book in solitude. "Once more, I'm haunted by my old idea of a book that takes place on top of the Great St. Bernard. As I add and discard ideas for Little Dorrit, it keeps coming back to me. In a couple of years, you might find me spending an entire winter with the monks and the dogs in the blinding snow around that monastery. I really think I'll do it, if I’m still alive then." At this point, he was in Paris; [185] and during Macready's visit to him the following April, he continued to share his thoughts. The great actor was living in retirement in Sherborne, where he had gone after leaving the stage; and Dickens reported positively on how much Macready enjoyed his little holiday in Paris. He then brought up his old thought of possibly moving to Australia, but he knew he couldn't do it until he finished Little Dorrit. He added that maybe Macready, if he could get back to work, would benefit from some of the worries that were troubling him. "It makes me sad to think of him alone in that quiet place in Sherborne. I've always believed that I must, God willing, die while still working, but I've never felt that more strongly than when I think about him. It might be strange to never be at rest, never satisfied, always chasing after something that can never be attained, burdened with plots and plans and worries. Yet it’s clear that this must be, and that one is driven by some powerful force until the journey is complete! It’s better to keep going and be anxious than to stop and be anxious. As for peace—some men will never find that in this life. The above sounds a bit like a sermon, but it’s been on my mind a lot lately, so it can’t help but come out. The old days—those old days! I wonder if I’ll ever get back to the mindset I used to have? Maybe some of it, but it will never be quite the same. I find that the skeleton in my closet is becoming quite large."
It would be unjust and uncandid not to admit that[186] these and other similar passages in the letters that extended over the years while he lived abroad, had served in some degree as a preparation for what came after his return to England in the following year. It came with a great shock nevertheless; because it told plainly what before had never been avowed, but only hinted at more or less obscurely. The opening reference is to the reply which had been made to a previous expression of his wish for some confidences as in the old time. I give only what is strictly necessary to account for what followed, and even this with deep reluctance. "Your letter of yesterday was so kind and hearty, and sounded so gently the many chords we have touched together, that I cannot leave it unanswered, though I have not much (to any purpose) to say. My reference to 'confidences' was merely to the relief of saying a word of what has long been pent up in my mind. Poor Catherine and I are not made for each other, and there is no help for it. It is not only that she makes me uneasy and unhappy, but that I make her so too—and much more so. She is exactly what you know, in the way of being amiable and complying; but we are strangely ill-assorted for the bond there is between us. God knows she would have been a thousand times happier if she had married another kind of man, and that her avoidance of this destiny would have been at least equally good for us both. I am often cut to the heart by thinking what a pity it is, for her own sake, that I ever fell in her way; and if I were sick or disabled to-morrow, I know how sorry she would be, and how deeply grieved myself, to think how we had lost each other. But exactly the same incompatibility would[187] arise, the moment I was well again; and nothing on earth could make her understand me, or suit us to each other. Her temperament will not go with mine. It mattered not so much when we had only ourselves to consider, but reasons have been growing since which make it all but hopeless that we should even try to struggle on. What is now befalling me I have seen steadily coming, ever since the days you remember when Mary was born; and I know too well that you cannot, and no one can, help me. Why I have even written I hardly know; but it is a miserable sort of comfort that you should be clearly aware how matters stand. The mere mention of the fact, without any complaint or blame of any sort, is a relief to my present state of spirits—and I can get this only from you, because I can speak of it to no one else." In the same tone was his rejoinder to my reply. "To the most part of what you say—Amen! You are not so tolerant as perhaps you might be of the wayward and unsettled feeling which is part (I suppose) of the tenure on which one holds an imaginative life, and which I have, as you ought to know well, often only kept down by riding over it like a dragoon—but let that go by. I make no maudlin complaint. I agree with you as to the very possible incidents, even not less bearable than mine, that might and must often occur to the married condition when it is entered into very young. I am always deeply sensible of the wonderful exercise I have of life and its highest sensations, and have said to myself for years, and have honestly and truly felt, This is the drawback to such a career, and is not to be complained of. I say it and feel it now as strongly as ever I did;[188] and, as I told you in my last, I do not with that view put all this forward. But the years have not made it easier to bear for either of us; and, for her sake as well as mine, the wish will force itself upon me that something might be done. I know too well it is impossible. There is the fact, and that is all one can say. Nor are you to suppose that I disguise from myself what might be urged on the other side. I claim no immunity from blame. There is plenty of fault on my side, I dare say, in the way of a thousand uncertainties, caprices, and difficulties of disposition; but only one thing will alter all that, and that is, the end which alters everything."
It would be unfair and insincere not to acknowledge that[186] these and other similar passages in the letters that went on for years while he was living abroad had somewhat prepared me for what happened after his return to England the following year. Still, it hit me hard; it clearly stated what had never been openly admitted before, only hinted at vaguely. The opening reference is to the response to a previous expression of his desire for some confidences like in the past. I’ll share just what’s necessary to explain what happened next, even though I do so with great reluctance. "Your letter yesterday was so warm and heartfelt, and it resonated with the many connections we've shared, that I can’t leave it unanswered, even though I don’t have much (of use) to say. When I mentioned 'confidences,' I was merely looking for relief in expressing things that have long been bottled up in my mind. Poor Catherine and I are simply not meant for each other, and there’s nothing that can change that. It’s not just that she makes me uneasy and unhappy; I make her feel that way too—and even more so. She is everything you know—sweet and accommodating—but we are strangely mismatched for the bond we have. God knows she would have been so much happier if she had married a different kind of man, and avoiding this fate would have probably been just as good for both of us. I’m often heartbroken thinking about how unfortunate it is, for her sake, that I ever crossed her path; and if I were to fall ill or get hurt tomorrow, I know how sad she would be, and how deeply I’d grieve thinking about how we lost each other. But the same incompatibility would[187] arise the moment I got well again; nothing on earth could make her understand me or make us fit together. Our temperaments just don’t mesh. It didn’t matter as much when it was just about us, but circumstances have changed since then, making it almost impossible for us to even try to keep going. What’s happening to me now, I’ve seen coming ever since those days you remember when Mary was born; and I know all too well that you can’t help me, and neither can anyone else. I don’t even know why I’m writing this; but it’s a small comfort to have you clearly understand how things stand. Just mentioning the fact, without any complaint or blame, is a relief to my current state of mind—and I can only get this comfort from you because I can’t talk about it with anyone else." He replied in the same tone to my response. "For the most part of what you say—Amen! You might not be as understanding as you could be about the unpredictable and unsettled feelings that come with an imaginative life, which I have often kept in check by pushing through it like a soldier—but that can be set aside. I’m not making a sentimental complaint. I agree with you about the possible situations, perhaps no less challenging than mine, that often arise when people marry very young. I’m always deeply aware of the incredible experience I have in life and its highest sensations, and I’ve told myself for years, honestly and truly, that this is the downside of such a path, and it shouldn’t be complained about. I still say it and feel it just as strongly as I ever did;[188] and, as I mentioned in my last message, I’m not bringing this up with that in mind. But the years haven’t made it easier for either of us; and for her sake as well as mine, I can’t help but wish something could be done. I know very well it’s impossible. There’s the reality, and that’s all one can say. And don’t think that I’m hiding from myself what could be said from the other perspective. I don’t claim to be free from blame. I know there’s plenty of fault on my end, I’m sure, due to uncertainties, whims, and disposition challenges; but only one thing can change all that, and that’s the ending that changes everything."
It will not seem to most people that there was anything here which in happier circumstances might not have been susceptible of considerate adjustment; but all the circumstances were unfavourable, and the moderate middle course which the admissions in that letter might wisely have prompted and wholly justified, was unfortunately not taken. Compare what before was said of his temperament, with what is there said by himself of its defects, and the explanation will not be difficult. Every counteracting influence against the one idea which now predominated over him had been so weakened as to be almost powerless. His elder children were no longer children; his books had lost for the time the importance they formerly had over every other consideration in his life; and he had not in himself the resource that such a man, judging him from the surface, might be expected to have had. Not his genius only, but his whole nature, was too exclusively made up of sympathy for, and with, the real in its most intense form, to be sufficiently provided against[189] failure in the realities around him. There was for him no "city of the mind" against outward ills, for inner consolation and shelter. It was in and from the actual he still stretched forward to find the freedom and satisfactions of an ideal, and by his very attempts to escape the world he was driven back into the thick of it. But what he would have sought there, it supplies to none; and to get the infinite out of anything so finite, has broken many a stout heart.
Most people probably wouldn’t think there was anything here that, under better circumstances, could not have been reasonably resolved; however, all the circumstances were unfavorable, and the balanced approach that the admissions in that letter could have wisely suggested and completely justified was unfortunately not taken. Compare what was previously said about his temperament with what he himself says about its flaws, and the explanation will become clear. Every opposing influence against the one idea that now dominated him had been so weakened that it was almost powerless. His older children were no longer children; his books had temporarily lost the importance they once held over every other aspect of his life; and he did not possess the resources that one might expect from a man like him, judged from the outside. Not only his genius but his entire nature was too focused on sympathy for, and connection with, the real in its most intense form, leaving him ill-equipped to cope with the failures of the realities surrounding him. He had no "city of the mind" to escape the external troubles for inner comfort and shelter. Instead, he kept reaching out from the actual world to find the freedom and satisfaction of an ideal, and his very attempts to escape the world pushed him deeper into it. But what he sought there is offered to no one; and trying to extract the infinite from anything so finite has crushed many a strong heart.
At the close of that last letter from Gadshill (5th of September) was this question—"What do you think of my paying for this place, by reviving that old idea of some Readings from my books. I am very strongly tempted. Think of it." The reasons against it had great force, and took, in my judgment, greater from the time at which it was again proposed. The old ground of opposition remained. It was a substitution of lower for higher aims; a change to commonplace from more elevated pursuits; and it had so much of the character of a public exhibition for money as to raise, in the question of respect for his calling as a writer, a question also of respect for himself as a gentleman. This opinion, now strongly reiterated, was referred ultimately to two distinguished ladies of his acquaintance, who decided against it.[214] Yet not without[190] such momentary misgiving in the direction of "the stage," as pointed strongly to the danger, which, by those who took the opposite view, was most of all thought incident to the particular time of the proposal. It might be a wild exaggeration to fear that he was in danger of being led to adopt the stage as a calling, but he was certainly about to place himself within reach of not a few of its drawbacks and disadvantages. To the full extent he perhaps did not himself know, how much his eager present wish to become a public reader was but the outcome of the restless domestic discontents of the last four years; and that to indulge it, and the unsettled habits inseparable from it, was to abandon every hope of resettling his disordered home. There is nothing, in its application to so divine a genius as Shakespeare, more affecting than his expressed dislike to a profession, which, in the jealous self-watchfulness of his noble nature, he feared might[191] hurt his mind.[215] The long subsequent line of actors admirable in private as in public life, and all the gentle and generous associations of the histrionic art, have not weakened the testimony of its greatest name against its less favourable influences; against the laxity of habits it may encourage; and its public manners, bred of public means, not always compatible with home felicities and duties. But, freely open as Dickens was to counsel in regard of his books, he was, for reasons formerly stated,[216] less accessible to it on points of personal conduct; and when he had neither self-distrust nor self-denial to hold him back, he would push persistently forward to whatever object he had in view.
At the end of that last letter from Gadshill (September 5th) was this question—"What do you think about me paying for this place by reviving the old idea of doing some Readings from my books? I'm really tempted. Think about it." The reasons against it were strong and, in my opinion, were even more significant given the timing of the proposal. The old reasons for opposition still stood. It was a shift from higher to lower goals; a change from more elevated pursuits to something more ordinary; and it had a lot of the feel of a public money-making event, which raised questions about his respect for his profession as a writer and his self-respect as a gentleman. This opinion, now firmly restated, was ultimately referred to two distinguished women he knew, who decided against it.[214] Yet not without[190] some momentary doubts about "the stage," which highlighted the risks that, according to those with the opposite view, were especially pertinent at that particular time. It might be a wild exaggeration to worry that he might be led to adopt acting as a profession, but he was definitely about to expose himself to many of its drawbacks and disadvantages. Perhaps he didn't fully realize how much his eager desire to become a public reader was just a response to the restless domestic discontent of the last four years; and that indulging this wish, along with the unsettled habits it brought, would mean giving up any hope of fixing his troubled home. There’s nothing more touching, in relation to such a divine genius as Shakespeare, than his stated dislike for a profession that, due to his noble nature's cautious self-awareness, he feared might[191] harm his mind.[215] The long line of actors who have been wonderful in both private and public life, along with all the kind and generous associations of acting, have not diminished the statement of its greatest name against its less favorable influences; against the laxity of habits it may promote; and its public demeanor, formed through public means, which isn’t always compatible with home happiness and responsibilities. But while Dickens was very open to advice regarding his books, he was, for the reasons previously mentioned,[216] less receptive to it when it came to personal conduct; and when he didn't have self-doubt or self-denial to hold him back, he would relentlessly pursue whatever goal he had in mind.
An occurrence of the time hastened the decision in this case. An enterprise had been set on foot for establishment of a hospital for sick children;[217] a large old-fashioned mansion in Great Ormond-street, with spacious garden, had been fitted up with more than thirty beds; during the four or five years of its existence, outdoor and indoor relief had been afforded by it to nearly fifty thousand children, of whom thirty thousand were under five years of age; but, want of funds having threatened to arrest the merciful work, it was resolved to try a public dinner by way of charitable appeal, and for president the happy choice was made of one who had enchanted everybody with the joys and sorrows of little children. Dickens threw himself into the service heart and soul. There was a simple pathos in his address from the chair quite startling in its effect at such a meeting; and he probably never moved any audience so much as by the strong personal feeling with which he referred to the sacrifices made for the Hospital by the very poor themselves: from whom a subscription of fifty pounds, contributed in single pennies, had come to the treasurer during almost every year it had been open. The whole speech, indeed, is the best of the kind spoken by him; and two little pictures from it, one of the misery he had witnessed, the other of the[193] remedy he had found, should not be absent from the picture of his own life.
A situation at the time accelerated the decision in this case. A project had started to establish a hospital for sick children; [217] a large, old-fashioned mansion on Great Ormond Street, complete with a spacious garden, had been equipped with over thirty beds. In its four to five years of operation, it had provided both outdoor and indoor care to nearly fifty thousand children, thirty thousand of whom were under five years old. However, a lack of funds threatened to halt this compassionate work, so it was decided to host a public dinner for a charitable appeal, and the choice of president fell on someone who had captivated everyone with the joys and struggles of little children. Dickens fully committed himself to the cause. There was a simple emotion in his speech from the chair that was quite striking for such a gathering; and he probably never moved any audience more than by the deep personal feeling with which he mentioned the sacrifices that the very poor had made for the Hospital: they had contributed a subscription of fifty pounds, collected in single pennies, to the treasurer almost every year since it opened. The entire speech is, in fact, the best of its kind delivered by him, and two little anecdotes from it, one about the suffering he had seen and the other about the solution he had found, should always be part of the narrative of his own life.
"Some years ago, being in Scotland, I went with one of the most humane members of the most humane of professions, on a morning tour among some of the worst lodged inhabitants of the old town of Edinburgh. In the closes and wynds of that picturesque place (I am sorry to remind you what fast friends picturesqueness and typhus often are), we saw more poverty and sickness in an hour than many people would believe in, in a life. Our way lay from one to another of the most wretched dwellings, reeking with horrible odours; shut out from the sky and from the air, mere pits and dens. In a room in one of these places, where there was an empty porridge-pot on the cold hearth, a ragged woman and some ragged children crouching on the bare ground near it,—and, I remember as I speak, where the very light, refracted from a high damp-stained wall outside, came in trembling, as if the fever which had shaken everything else had shaken even it,—there lay, in an old egg-box which the mother had begged from a shop, a little, feeble, wan, sick child. With his little wasted face, and his little hot worn hands folded over his breast, and his little bright attentive eyes, I can see him now, as I have seen him for several years, looking steadily at us. There he lay in his small frail box, which was not at all a bad emblem of the small body from which he was slowly parting—there he lay, quite quiet, quite patient, saying never a word. He seldom cried, the mother said; he seldom complained; 'he lay there, seemin' to woonder what it was a' aboot.' God knows, I thought, as I stood looking at him, he[194] had his reasons for wondering. . . . Many a poor child, sick and neglected, I have seen since that time in London; many have I also seen most affectionately tended, in unwholesome houses and hard circumstances where recovery was impossible: but at all such times I have seen my little drooping friend in his egg-box, and he has always addressed his dumb wonder to me what it meant, and why, in the name of a gracious God, such things should be! . . . But, ladies and gentlemen," Dickens added, "such things need not be, and will not be, if this company, which is a drop of the life-blood of the great compassionate public heart, will only accept the means of rescue and prevention which it is mine to offer. Within a quarter of a mile of this place where I speak, stands a once courtly old house, where blooming children were born, and grew up to be men and women, and married, and brought their own blooming children back to patter up the old oak staircase which stood but the other day, and to wonder at the old oak carvings on the chimney-pieces. In the airy wards into which the old state drawing-rooms and family bedchambers of that house are now converted, are lodged such small patients that the attendant nurses look like reclaimed giantesses, and the kind medical practitioner like an amiable Christian ogre. Grouped about the little low tables in the centre of the rooms, are such tiny convalescents that they seem to be playing at having been ill. On the doll's beds are such diminutive creatures that each poor sufferer is supplied with its tray of toys: and, looking round, you may see how the little tired flushed cheek has toppled over half the brute creation on its way into the ark; or how one little[195] dimpled arm has mowed down (as I saw myself) the whole tin soldiery of Europe. On the walls of these rooms are graceful, pleasant, bright, childish pictures. At the beds' heads, hang representations of the figure which is the universal embodiment of all mercy and compassion, the figure of Him who was once a child Himself, and a poor one. But alas! reckoning up the number of beds that are there, the visitor to this Child's Hospital will find himself perforce obliged to stop at very little over thirty; and will learn, with sorrow and surprise, that even that small number, so forlornly, so miserably diminutive compared with this vast London, cannot possibly be maintained unless the Hospital be made better known. I limit myself to saying better known, because I will not believe that in a Christian community of fathers and mothers, and brothers and sisters, it can fail, being better known, to be well and richly-endowed." It was a brave and true prediction. The Child's Hospital has never since known want. That night alone added greatly more than three thousand pounds to its funds, and Dickens put the crown to his good work by reading on its behalf, shortly afterwards, his Christmas Carol; when the sum realized, and the urgent demand that followed for a repetition of the pleasure given by the reading, bore down farther opposition to the project of his engaging publicly in such readings for himself.
Some years ago, while I was in Scotland, I went with one of the most compassionate members of one of the most compassionate professions on a morning tour among some of the worst-off residents of the old town of Edinburgh. In the alleys and streets of that picturesque place (I’m sorry to remind you how closely linked beauty and disease often are), we saw more poverty and illness in an hour than many people would believe exists in a lifetime. We traveled from one of the most miserable homes to another, filled with terrible smells, shut off from the sky and air, mere pits and dens. In one of these places, where there was an empty porridge pot on the cold hearth, a ragged woman and some ragged children were huddled on the bare ground nearby,—and I remember as I speak, where the very light, refracted from a high damp-stained wall outside, came in trembling, as if the fever that had shaken everything else had shaken even it,—there lay, in an old egg box that the mother had begged from a shop, a little, weak, pale, sick child. With his little wasted face, his little hot worn hands folded over his chest, and his little bright, attentive eyes, I can still see him now, as I have seen him for several years, looking steadily at us. There he lay in his small fragile box, which was not a bad symbol of the small body from which he was slowly parting—there he lay, completely still, completely patient, saying not a word. He seldom cried, the mother said; he seldom complained; 'he lay there, seemin' to wonder what it was all about.' God knows, I thought, as I stood looking at him, he had his reasons for wondering. . . . Many a poor child, sick and neglected, I have seen since that time in London; many have I also seen most tenderly cared for, in unhealthy houses and tough circumstances where recovery was impossible: but at all such times, I have seen my little drooping friend in his egg box, and he has always silently asked me what it meant, and why, in the name of a gracious God, such things should be! . . . But, ladies and gentlemen," Dickens added, "such things need not be, and will not be, if this company, which is a drop of the life-blood of the great compassionate public heart, will only accept the means of rescue and prevention that I am here to offer. Within a quarter of a mile from where I speak, stands a once-grand old house, where vibrant children were born, grew up to be men and women, married, and brought their own vibrant children back to rush up the old oak staircase that stood just the other day, and to marvel at the old oak carvings on the fireplace. In the airy wards where the old state drawing rooms and family bedrooms of that house are now converted, are cared for such small patients that the attending nurses look like reclaimed giantesses, and the kind doctor looks like an amiable giant. Gathered around the little low tables in the middle of the rooms are such tiny convalescents that they seem to be playing at having been sick. On the doll's beds are such little beings that each poor sufferer is provided with a tray of toys: and, looking around, you can see how the little tired flushed cheek has toppled over half the toy animals on its way into the playroom; or how one little dimpled arm has wiped out (as I saw myself) the whole toy army of Europe. On the walls of these rooms are charming, pleasant, colorful, childlike pictures. At the heads of the beds hang images of the figure that represents all mercy and compassion, the figure of Him who was once a child Himself, and a poor one. But alas! counting the number of beds that are there, the visitor to this Children's Hospital will find himself forced to stop at barely thirty; and will learn, with sadness and surprise, that even that small number, so sadly, so pitifully small compared to this vast London, cannot possibly be sustained unless the Hospital is made better known. I limit myself to saying better known because I can’t believe that in a Christian community of fathers and mothers, and brothers and sisters, it can fail, being better known, to be well and richly supported." It was a brave and true prediction. The Children’s Hospital has never since known need. That night alone contributed more than three thousand pounds to its funds, and Dickens capped off his good work by reading on its behalf, shortly afterward, his *Christmas Carol*; when the amount raised, and the urgent demand that followed for a repeat of the pleasure provided by the reading, further silenced opposition to the project of his engaging publicly in such readings for himself.
The Child's Hospital night was the 9th of February, its Reading was appointed for the 15th of April, and, nearly a month before, renewed efforts at remonstrance had been made. "Your view of the reading matter," Dickens replied, "I still think is unconsciously taken[196] from your own particular point. You don't seem to me to get out of yourself in considering it. A word more upon it. You are not to think I have made up my mind. If I had, why should I not say so? I find very great difficulty in doing so because of what you urge, because I know the question to be a balance of doubts, and because I most honestly feel in my innermost heart, in this matter (as in all others for years and years), the honour of the calling by which I have always stood most conscientiously. But do you quite consider that the public exhibition of oneself takes place equally, whosoever may get the money? And have you any idea that at this moment—this very time—half the public at least supposes me to be paid? My dear F, out of the twenty or five-and-twenty letters a week that I get about Readings, twenty will ask at what price, or on what terms, it can be done. The only exceptions, in truth, are when the correspondent is a clergyman, or a banker, or the member for the place in question. Why, at this very time half Scotland believes that I am paid for going to Edinburgh!—Here is Greenock writes to me, and asks could it be done for a hundred pounds? There is Aberdeen writes, and states the capacity of its hall, and says, though far less profitable than the very large hall in Edinburgh, is it not enough to come on for? W. answers such letters continually. (—At this place, enter Beale. He called here yesterday morning, and then wrote to ask if I would see him to-day. I replied 'Yes,' so here he came in. With long preface called to know whether it was possible to arrange anything in the way of Readings for this autumn—say, six[197] months. Large capital at command. Could produce partners, in such an enterprise, also with large capital. Represented such. Returns would be enormous. Would I name a sum? a minimum sum that I required to have, in any case? Would I look at it as a Fortune, and in no other point of view? I shook my head, and said, my tongue was tied on the subject for the present; I might be more communicative at another time. Exit Beale in confusion and disappointment.)—You will be happy to hear that at one on Friday, the Lord Provost, Dean of Guild, Magistrates, and Council of the ancient city of Edinburgh will wait (in procession) on their brother freeman, at the Music Hall, to give him hospitable welcome. Their brother freeman has been cursing their stars and his own, ever since the receipt of solemn notification to this effect." But very grateful, when it came, was the enthusiasm of the greeting, and welcome the gift of the silver wassail-bowl which followed the reading of the Carol. "I had no opportunity of asking any one's advice in Edinburgh," he wrote on his return. "The crowd was too enormous, and the excitement in it much too great. But my determination is all but taken. I must do something, or I shall wear my heart away. I can see no better thing to do that is half so hopeful in itself, or half so well suited to my restless state."
The Child's Hospital night was on February 9th, its Reading was scheduled for April 15th, and, almost a month before, renewed attempts at protest had been made. "Your perspective on the reading material," Dickens replied, "I still think is unconsciously taken from your own particular point of view. You don't seem to me to step outside yourself in considering it. One more thing. You shouldn't think I have made up my mind. If I had, why wouldn't I just say so? I find it really hard to do so because of what you mentioned, because I know the question involves a balance of uncertainties, and because I genuinely feel in my deepest heart, in this matter (as in all others for many years), the honor of the profession I've always taken very seriously. But do you really consider that the public display of oneself happens just as much, regardless of who gets paid? And do you think that right now—at this very moment—at least half the public believes I'm being compensated? My dear F, out of the twenty or twenty-five letters I receive weekly regarding Readings, twenty will ask at what price or on what terms it can be done. The only exceptions, honestly, are when the sender is a clergyman, a banker, or the local MP. Would you believe that right now half of Scotland thinks I'm getting paid to go to Edinburgh?—Here’s Greenock writing to me, asking if it can be done for a hundred pounds. There’s Aberdeen writing, sharing its hall's capacity, and saying that although it’s much less profitable than the massive hall in Edinburgh, isn’t it enough to come for? W. constantly replies to such letters. (—At this point, Beale arrives. He visited yesterday morning, then wrote to ask if I would see him today. I said 'Yes,' so he came in. After a lengthy introduction, he asked if it would be possible to arrange any Readings for this autumn—say, six months. Large funds available. Could bring in partners for such an endeavor, also with large investments. He presented such an offer. The returns would be massive. Would I name a figure? a minimum amount I required in any event? Would I view it as a Fortune and nothing else? I shook my head and said my lips were sealed on the topic for now; I might be more open another time. Beale left in embarrassment and disappointment.)—You’ll be pleased to hear that at one o'clock on Friday, the Lord Provost, Dean of Guild, Magistrates, and Council of the ancient city of Edinburgh will be waiting (in procession) to greet their fellow freeman at the Music Hall, to give him a warm welcome. Their fellow freeman has been cursing his fate and theirs ever since receiving the formal notification about this." However, the enthusiasm for the greeting was incredibly heartwarming when it came, and the silver wassail-bowl gift that followed the reading of the Carol was welcomed. "I had no chance to ask anyone’s advice in Edinburgh," he wrote upon his return. "The crowd was just too huge, and the excitement was overwhelming. But my decision is almost made. I must do something, or I will wear my heart out. I can't see a better thing to do that is even remotely as hopeful or as well-suited to my restless state."
What is pointed at in those last words had been taken as a ground of objection, and thus he turned it into an argument the other way. During all these months many sorrowful misunderstandings had continued in his home, and the relief sought from the misery had but the effect of making desperate any[198] hope of a better understanding. "It becomes necessary," he wrote at the end of March, "with a view to the arrangements that would have to be begun next month if I decided on the Readings, to consider and settle the question of the Plunge. Quite dismiss from your mind any reference whatever to present circumstances at home. Nothing can put them right, until we are all dead and buried and risen. It is not, with me, a matter of will, or trial, or sufferance, or good humour, or making the best of it, or making the worst of it, any longer. It is all despairingly over. Have no lingering hope of, or for, me in this association. A dismal failure has to be borne, and there an end. Will you then try to think of this reading project (as I do) apart from all personal likings and dislikings, and solely with a view to its effect on that peculiar relation (personally affectionate, and like no other man's) which subsists between me and the public? I want your most careful consideration. If you would like, when you have gone over it in your mind, to discuss the matter with me and Arthur Smith (who would manage the whole of the business, which I should never touch); we will make an appointment. But I ought to add that Arthur Smith plainly says, 'Of the immense return in money, I have no doubt. Of the Dash into the new position, however, I am not so good a judge.' I enclose you a rough note[218] of my project, as it stands in my mind."
What is pointed out in those last words had been used as a reason for objection, and so he turned it into an argument in the opposite direction. Throughout these months, many painful misunderstandings had persisted in his home, and the relief sought from the misery only made any hopes for better understanding seem more desperate.[198] "It’s necessary," he wrote at the end of March, "to think about and finalize the question of the Plunge with the arrangements that will need to start next month if I choose to go forward with the Readings. Please completely disregard any reference to our current situation at home. Nothing can fix them until we’re all dead and buried and risen again. It’s no longer a matter of will, trying, suffering, good humor, making the best of it, or making the worst of it, for me. It’s all hopelessly over. Don’t hold on to any lingering hopes for me in this connection. A dismal failure has to be accepted, and that’s the end of it. So, will you try to think of this reading project (as I do) separately from any personal likes and dislikes, and only considering its impact on the unique relationship (personally affectionate and unlike any other) I have with the public? I want your careful consideration on this. If you’d like, after you’ve thought it over, to discuss the matter with me and Arthur Smith (who would handle the entire business, which I wouldn’t touch); we can set up a meeting. But I should mention that Arthur Smith clearly says, ‘I have no doubt about the huge financial return. However, I’m not so good at judging the leap into the new position.’ I’m enclosing a rough note[218] of my project as it stands in my mind."
Mr. Arthur Smith, a man possessed of many qualities that justified the confidence Dickens placed in him, might not have been a good judge of the "Dash" into the new position, but no man knew better every disadvantage incident to it, or was less likely to be disconcerted by any. His exact fitness to manage the scheme successfully, made him an unsafe counsellor respecting it. Within a week from this time the reading for the Charity was to be given. "They have let," Dickens wrote on the 9th of April, "five hundred[200] stalls for the Hospital night; and as people come every day for more, and it is out of the question to make more, they cannot be restrained at St. Martin's Hall from taking down names for other readings." This closed the attempt at further objection. Exactly a fortnight after the reading for the children's hospital, on Thursday the 29th April, came the first public reading for his own benefit; and before the next month was over, this launch into a new life had been followed by a change in his old home. Thenceforward he and his wife lived apart. The eldest son went with his mother, Dickens at once giving effect to her expressed wish in this respect; and the other children remained with himself, their intercourse with Mrs. Dickens being left entirely to themselves. It was thus far an arrangement of a strictly private nature, and no decent person could have had excuse for regarding it in any other light, if public attention had not been unexpectedly invited to it by a printed statement in Household Words. Dickens was stung into this by some miserable gossip at which in ordinary circumstances no man would more determinedly have been silent; but he had now publicly to show himself, at stated times, as a public entertainer, and this, with his name even so aspersed, he found to be impossible. All he would concede to my strenuous resistance against such a publication, was an offer to suppress it, if, upon reference to the opinion of a certain distinguished man (still living), that opinion should prove to be in agreement with mine. Unhappily it fell in with his own, and the publication went on. It was followed by another statement, a letter subscribed with his name,[201] which got into print without his sanction; nothing publicly being known of it (I was not among those who had read it privately) until it appeared in the New York Tribune. It had been addressed and given to Mr. Arthur Smith as an authority for correction of false rumours and scandals, and Mr. Smith had given a copy of it, with like intention, to the Tribune correspondent in London. Its writer referred to it always afterwards as his "violated letter."
Mr. Arthur Smith, a man with many qualities that warranted Dickens' trust, might not have been the best judge of the leap into this new role, but no one understood the drawbacks better or was less likely to be rattled by them. His suitability for managing the project successfully made him a risky advisor on it. Within a week, there was to be a reading for the Charity. "They have sold," Dickens wrote on April 9th, "five hundred[200] stalls for the Hospital night; and since people come daily wanting more, and it’s impossible to create more, they can’t stop at St. Martin's Hall from taking down names for other readings." This put an end to any further objections. Exactly two weeks after the reading for the children's hospital, on Thursday, April 29th, came the first public reading for his own benefit; and before the end of the following month, this shift into a new life led to changes in his old home. From then on, he and his wife lived separately. The eldest son went with his mother, and Dickens immediately honored her wish in that regard; the other children stayed with him, their communication with Mrs. Dickens being entirely up to them. Thus far, it was a private arrangement, and no respectable person could have seen it any other way, if public interest hadn’t unexpectedly been drawn to it by a printed statement in Household Words. Dickens felt compelled to respond to some unpleasant gossip that, under normal circumstances, he would have ignored; but now, with scheduled public appearances as an entertainer, he found it impossible to continue with his name being dragged through the mud. The only concession he made to my strong opposition against the publication was to agree to withhold it if a certain distinguished individual (still living) agreed with my view. Unfortunately, that person did agree with him, and the publication proceeded. It was followed by another announcement, a letter signed with his name,[201] which was published without his approval; no one publicly knew of it (I hadn't read it privately) until it appeared in the New York Tribune. It had been addressed to Mr. Arthur Smith as a source to correct false rumors and scandals, and Mr. Smith had given a copy to the Tribune correspondent in London for the same purpose. The writer later referred to it as his "violated letter."
The course taken by the author of this book at the time of these occurrences, will not be departed from here. Such illustration of grave defects in Dickens's character as the passage in his life affords, I have not shrunk from placing side by side with such excuses in regard to it as he had unquestionable right to claim should be put forward also. How far what remained of his story took tone or colour from it, and especially from the altered career on which at the same time he entered, will thus be sufficiently explained; and with anything else the public have nothing to do.
The path taken by the author of this book during these events will be maintained here. I haven't hesitated to present both the serious flaws in Dickens's character revealed by this part of his life and the valid excuses he has the right to put forward as well. This will clarify how the rest of his story is influenced by this, particularly by the different direction he was taking at the same time; everything else is irrelevant to the public.
CHAPTER VIII.
GADSHILL PLACE.
1856-1870.
"I was better pleased with Gadshill Place last Saturday," he wrote to me from Paris on the 13th of February 1856, "on going down there, even than I had prepared myself to be. The country, against every disadvantage of season, is beautiful; and the house is so old fashioned, cheerful, and comfortable, that it is really pleasant to look at. The good old Rector now there, has lived in it six and twenty years, so I have not the heart to turn him out. He is to remain till Lady-Day next year, when I shall go in, please God; make my alterations; furnish the house; and keep it for myself that summer." Returning to England through the Kentish country with Mr. Wilkie Collins in July, other advantages occurred to him. "A railroad opened from Rochester to Maidstone, which connects Gadshill at once with the whole sea coast, is certainly an addition to the place, and an enhancement[203] of its value. Bye and bye we shall have the London, Chatham and Dover, too; and that will bring it within an hour of Canterbury and an hour and a[204] half of Dover. I am glad to hear of your having been in the neighbourhood. There is no healthier (marshes avoided), and none in my eyes more beautiful. One of these days I shall show you some places up the Medway with which you will be charmed."
"I’m here even more pleased with Gadshill Place last Saturday," he wrote to me from Paris on February 13, 1856, "when I went down there than I had expected to be. The countryside, despite the season’s drawbacks, is beautiful; and the house is so old-fashioned, cheerful, and comfortable that it's truly pleasant to look at. The good old Rector living there has been in it for twenty-six years, so I can't bear to kick him out. He will stay until Lady-Day next year, when I plan to move in, God willing; make my changes; furnish the house; and keep it for myself that summer." While returning to England through the Kentish countryside with Mr. Wilkie Collins in July, he thought of other benefits. "A new railroad from Rochester to Maidstone, which connects Gadshill directly with the entire coast, is definitely a plus for the place and increases its value. Soon we’ll have the London, Chatham, and Dover line too; that will bring it within an hour of Canterbury and an hour and a[204] half of Dover. I’m glad to hear you were in the area. It’s one of the healthiest places (if you avoid the marshes) and, in my eyes, one of the most beautiful. One of these days, I’ll show you some spots along the Medway that you’ll love."

The association with his youthful fancy that first made the place attractive to him has been told; and it was with wonder he had heard one day, from his friend and fellow worker at Household Words, Mr. W. H. Wills, that not only was the house for sale to which he had so often looked wistfully, but that the lady chiefly interested as its owner had been long known and much esteemed by himself. Such curious chances led Dickens to his saying about the smallness of the world; but the close relation often found thus existing between things and persons far apart, suggests not so much the smallness of the world as the possible importance of the least things done in it, and is better explained by the grander teaching of Carlyle, that causes and effects, connecting every man and thing with every other, extend through all space and time.
The connection with his youthful imagination that initially made the place appealing to him has been mentioned; and he was astonished when he heard one day from his friend and colleague at Household Words, Mr. W. H. Wills, that not only was the house he had often gazed at wistfully on the market, but that the woman primarily interested as its owner had long been known and greatly respected by him. Such strange coincidences led Dickens to proclaim about the smallness of the world; however, the close connection often found between distant things and people suggests not so much the world's smallness as the potential significance of even the smallest actions within it, and is better explained by Carlyle's deeper notion that causes and effects, linking every person and thing with one another, stretch across all space and time.
It was at the close of 1855 the negociation for its purchase began. "They wouldn't," he wrote (25th of November), "take £1700 for the Gadshill property, but 'finally' wanted £1800. I have finally offered £1750. It will require an expenditure of about £300 more before yielding £100 a year." The usual discovery of course awaited him that this first estimate would have to be increased threefold. "The changes absolutely necessary" (9th of February 1856) "will take a thousand pounds; which sum I am always resolving to squeeze out of this, grind out of that, and wring[205] out of the other; this, that, and the other generally all three declining to come up to the scratch for the purpose." "This day,"[219] he wrote on the 14th of March, "I have paid the purchase money for Gadshill Place. After drawing the cheque (£1790) I turned round to give it to Wills, and said, 'Now isn't it an extraordinary thing—look at the Day—Friday! I have been nearly drawing it half a dozen times when the lawyers have not been ready, and here it comes round upon a Friday as a matter of course.'" He had no thought at this time of reserving the place wholly for himself, or of making it his own residence except at intervals of summer. He looked upon it as an investment only. "You will hardly know Gadshill again," he wrote in January 1858, "I am improving it so much—yet I have no interest in the place." But continued ownership brought increased liking; he took more and more interest in his own improvements, which were just the kind of occasional occupation and resource his life most wanted in its next seven or eight years; and any farther idea of letting it he soon abandoned altogether. It only once passed out of his possession thus, for four months in 1859; in the following year, on the sale of Tavistock House, he transferred to it his books and pictures and choicer furniture; and thenceforward, varied only by houses taken from time to time for the London season, he made it his permanent family abode. Now and then, even during those years,[206] he would talk of selling it; and on his last return from America, when he had sent the last of his sons out into the world, he really might have sold it if he could then have found a house in London suitable to him, and such as he could purchase. But in this he failed; secretly to his own satisfaction, as I believe; and thereupon, in that last autumn of his life, he projected and carried out his most costly addition to Gadshill. Already of course more money had been spent upon it than his first intention in buying it would have justified. He had so enlarged the accommodation, improved the grounds and offices, and added to the land, that, taking also into account this final outlay, the reserved price placed upon the whole after his death more than quadrupled what he had given in 1856 for the house, shrubbery, and twenty years' lease of a meadow field. It was then purchased, and is now inhabited, by his eldest son.
It was at the end of 1855 that the negotiations for its purchase started. "They wouldn’t," he wrote (25th of November), "take £1700 for the Gadshill property, but 'finally' wanted £1800. I have finally offered £1750. It will take about £300 more to get it ready before it brings in £100 a year." The usual discovery awaited him, of course, that this initial estimate would need to triple. "The changes absolutely necessary" (9th of February 1856) "will cost a thousand pounds; I'm always planning to squeeze that out of this, grind it out of that, and wring it out of the other; this, that, and the other generally all three refusing to come through for the purpose." "This day," he wrote on the 14th of March, "I have paid the purchase price for Gadshill Place. After writing the cheque (£1790), I turned around to give it to Wills and said, 'Now isn't it an extraordinary thing—look at the day—Friday! I've almost drawn it half a dozen times when the lawyers weren’t ready, and here it comes around on a Friday like it was meant to be.'" He didn’t plan at that time to reserve the place entirely for himself or make it his primary residence, except occasionally in the summer. He saw it only as an investment. "You will hardly recognize Gadshill again," he wrote in January 1858, "I'm improving it so much—yet I have no real attachment to the place." But continued ownership led to a growing fondness; he became more involved in his improvements, which were exactly the kind of occasional activity and resource his life needed for the next seven or eight years; and he quickly gave up any further idea of renting it out. It was only out of his possession once, for four months in 1859; in the following year, after selling Tavistock House, he moved his books, pictures, and finer furniture there; and after that, with only temporary houses taken for the London season, he made it his permanent family home. Now and then, even during those years, he would mention selling it; and upon his last return from America, when he sent his last son out into the world, he genuinely could have sold it if he’d found a suitable house in London to buy. But he failed in that; secretly, I believe to his satisfaction; and then, in that last autumn of his life, he planned and executed his most expensive addition to Gadshill. Of course, by then, he had already spent more money on it than he’d originally intended when buying it. He had expanded the space, improved the grounds and buildings, and added to the land, so that considering this final expense, the price set on the whole after his death more than quadrupled what he had paid in 1856 for the house, garden, and twenty years' lease of a meadow. It was then purchased and is now occupied by his eldest son.
Its position has been described, and one of the last-century-histories of Rochester quaintly mentions the principal interest of the locality. "Near the twenty-seventh stone from London is Gadshill, supposed to have been the scene of the robbery mentioned by Shakespeare in his play of Henry IV; there being reason to think also that it was Sir John Falstaff, of truly comic memory, who under the name of Oldcastle inhabited Cooling Castle of which the ruins are in the neighbourhood. A small distance to the left appears on an eminence the Hermitage the seat of the late Sir Francis Head, Bart;[220] and close to the road, on a small[207] ascent, is a neat building lately erected by Mr. Day. In descending Strood-hill is a fine prospect of Strood, Rochester, and Chatham, which three towns form a continued street extending above two miles in length." It had been supposed[221] that "the neat building lately erected by Mr. Day" was that which the great novelist made famous; but Gadshill Place had no existence until eight years after the date of the history. The good rector who so long lived in it told me, in 1859, that it had been built eighty years before by a then well-known character in those parts, one Stevens, father-in-law of Henslow the Cambridge professor of botany. Stevens, who could only with much difficulty manage to write his name, had begun life as ostler at an inn; had become husband to the landlord's widow; then a brewer; and finally, as he subscribed himself on one occasion, "mare" of Rochester. Afterwards the house was inhabited by Mr. Lynn (from some of the members of whose family Dickens made his purchase); and, before the Rev. Mr. Hindle became its tenant, it was inhabited by a Macaroni parson named Townshend, whose horses the Prince Regent bought, throwing into the bargain a box of much desired cigars. Altogether the place had notable associations even apart from those which have connected it with the masterpieces of English humour. "This House, Gadshill Place, stands[208] on the summit of Shakespeare's Gadshill, ever memorable for its association with Sir John Falstaff in his noble fancy. But, my lads, my lads, to-morrow morning, by four o'clock, early at Gadshill! there are pilgrims going to Canterbury with rich offerings, and traders riding to London with fat purses: I have vizards for you all; you have horses for yourselves." Illuminated by Mr. Owen Jones, and placed in a frame on the first-floor landing, these words were the greeting of the new tenant to his visitors. It was his first act of ownership.
Its location has been described, and one of the last-century histories of Rochester humorously mentions the main interest of the area. "Near the twenty-seventh stone from London is Gadshill, thought to be the site of the robbery mentioned by Shakespeare in his play Henry IV; there’s reason to believe it was Sir John Falstaff, of truly comic fame, who under the name of Oldcastle lived in Cooling Castle, the ruins of which are nearby. A short distance to the left, on a rise, is the Hermitage, the former home of the late Sir Francis Head, Bart; and close to the road, on a small ascent, is a neat building recently constructed by Mr. Day. As you descend Strood-hill, there’s a great view of Strood, Rochester, and Chatham, which together form a continuous street stretching over two miles." It was thought that "the neat building recently erected by Mr. Day" was the one the great novelist made famous; however, Gadshill Place didn’t exist until eight years after the history was written. The kind rector who lived there for so long told me in 1859 that it had been built eighty years earlier by a then well-known local figure, one Stevens, father-in-law of Henslow, the Cambridge professor of botany. Stevens, who could only very laboriously write his name, had started his life as an innkeeper’s stable hand; he then became the husband of the landlord's widow, became a brewer, and finally, as he signed himself on one occasion, "mayor" of Rochester. Later, the house was lived in by Mr. Lynn (from whom some family members Dickens purchased it); and before Rev. Mr. Hindle became its tenant, it was home to a Macaroni parson named Townshend, whose horses were purchased by the Prince Regent, who also threw in a box of highly sought-after cigars. Overall, the place had notable connections even apart from those linked to the masterpieces of English humor. "This House, Gadshill Place, stands[208] on the summit of Shakespeare's Gadshill, always memorable for its connection with Sir John Falstaff in his grand imagination. But, my lads, my lads, tomorrow morning, by four o'clock, early at Gadshill! There are pilgrims going to Canterbury with rich offerings, and traders riding to London with heavy purses: I have disguises for you all; you have horses for yourselves." Displayed by Mr. Owen Jones and framed on the first-floor landing, these words welcomed the new tenant’s visitors. It was his first act of ownership.
All his improvements, it should perhaps be remarked, were not exclusively matters of choice; and to illustrate by his letters what befell at the beginning of his changes, will show what attended them to the close. His earliest difficulty was very grave. There was only one spring of water for gentlefolk and villagers, and from some of the houses or cottages it was two miles away. "We are still" (6th of July) "boring for water here, at the rate of two pounds per day for wages. The men seem to like it very much, and to be perfectly comfortable." Another of his earliest experiences (5th of September) was thus expressed: "Hop-picking is going on, and people sleep in the garden, and breathe in at the keyhole of the house door. I have been amazed, before this year, by the number of miserable lean wretches, hardly able to crawl, who go hop-picking. I find it is a superstition that the dust of the newly picked hop, falling freshly into the throat, is a cure for consumption. So the poor creatures drag themselves along the roads, and sleep under wet hedges, and get cured soon and finally." Towards the close of the same month (24th of September) he wrote: "Here are six men perpetually[209] going up and down the well (I know that somebody will be killed), in the course of fitting a pump; which is quite a railway terminus—it is so iron, and so big. The process is much more like putting Oxford-street endwise, and laying gas along it, than anything else. By the time it is finished, the cost of this water will be something absolutely frightful. But of course it proportionately increases the value of the property, and that's my only comfort. . . . The horse has gone lame from a sprain, the big dog has run a tenpenny nail into one of his hind feet, the bolts have all flown out of the basket-carriage, and the gardener says all the fruit trees want replacing with new ones." Another note came in three days. "I have discovered that the seven miles between Maidstone and Rochester is one of the most beautiful walks in England. Five men have been looking attentively at the pump for a week, and (I should hope) may begin to fit it in the course of October." . . .
All his improvements, it should be noted, were not just matters of personal preference; and by sharing excerpts from his letters about the beginnings of his changes, we can see what followed them until the end. His initial challenge was significant. There was only one water spring for both the wealthy and the villagers, and for some houses or cottages, it was two miles away. "We are still" (6th of July) "digging for water here, paying two pounds a day for labor. The workers seem to enjoy it a lot and are quite comfortable." Another of his early observations (5th of September) was: "Hop-picking is happening, and people are sleeping in the garden, and peeking in through the keyhole of the house door. I’ve been struck, before this year, by the number of miserable, skinny folks who can barely move, participating in hop-picking. I learned it’s a superstition that the dust from the freshly picked hops that falls into the throat cures tuberculosis. So, these poor souls trudge along the roads, sleep under damp hedges, and end up cured sooner or later." Towards the end of the same month (24th of September), he wrote: "Here are six men constantly going up and down the well (I know someone will get hurt), while fitting a pump; it’s quite a scene, like a railway station—it’s so heavy and so large. The process resembles putting Oxford Street on its side and laying gas lines along it more than anything else. By the time it’s done, the cost of this water will be absolutely terrifying. But of course, it increases the property's value proportionately, and that’s my only consolation. . . . The horse has become lame from a sprain, the big dog has stepped on a tenpenny nail, the bolts flew out of the basket-carriage, and the gardener says all the fruit trees need to be replaced with new ones." A follow-up note arrived three days later. "I’ve found that the seven miles between Maidstone and Rochester is one of the most beautiful walks in England. Five men have been watching the pump carefully for a week, and (I hope) they may start installing it sometime in October." . . .
With even such varying fortune he effected other changes.[222] The exterior remained to the last much as it was when he used as a boy to see it first; a plain, old-fashioned, two-story, brick-built country house, with a bell-turret on the roof, and over the front door a quaint neat wooden porch with pillars and seats. But, among his additions and alterations, was a new drawing-room built out from the smaller existing one,[210] both being thrown together ultimately; two good bedrooms built on a third floor at the back; and such rearrangement of the ground floor as, besides its handsome drawing-room, and its dining-room which he hung with pictures, transformed its bedroom into a study which he lined with books and sometimes wrote in, and changed its breakfast-parlour into a retreat fitted up for smokers into which he put a small billiard-table. These several rooms opened from a hall having in it a series of Hogarth prints, until, after the artist's death, Stanfield's noble scenes were placed there, when the Hogarths were moved to his bedroom; and in this hall, during his last absence in America, a parquet floor was laid down. Nor did he omit such changes as might increase the comfort of his servants. He built entirely new offices and stables, and replaced a very old coach-house by a capital servants' hall, transforming the loft above into a commodious school-room or study for his boys. He made at the same time an excellent croquet-ground out of a waste piece of orchard.
With even such changing fortunes, he made other alterations.[222] The outside looked pretty much the same as when he first saw it as a boy; a simple, old-fashioned, two-story, brick country house, with a bell-turret on the roof and a charming, tidy wooden porch with pillars and seats above the front door. Among his renovations was a new drawing-room added to the smaller existing one,[210] which was ultimately combined; two nice bedrooms built on a third floor at the back; and a reconfiguration of the ground floor that, in addition to its attractive drawing-room and dining room—where he hung pictures—converted its bedroom into a study lined with books where he sometimes wrote, and turned its breakfast parlor into a retreat outfitted for smokers, which included a small billiard table. These various rooms opened from a hall that displayed a series of Hogarth prints, until, after the artist's death, Stanfield's impressive scenes were hung there, moving the Hogarths to his bedroom; and in this hall, during his last trip to America, a parquet floor was installed. He also made improvements to enhance the comfort of his servants. He built entirely new offices and stables and replaced a very old coach house with a great servants' hall, converting the loft above into a spacious schoolroom or study for his boys. At the same time, he created a fantastic croquet ground out of a neglected piece of orchard.
Belonging to the house, but unfortunately placed on the other side of the high road, was a shrubbery, well wooded though in desolate condition, in which stood two magnificent cedars; and having obtained, in 1859, the consent of the local authorities for the necessary underground work, Dickens constructed a passage beneath the road[223] from his front lawn; and in the[211] shrubbery thus rendered accessible, and which he then laid out very prettily, he placed afterwards a Swiss châlet[224] presented to him by Mr. Fechter, which arrived from Paris in ninety-four pieces fitting like the joints of a puzzle, but which proved to be somewhat costly in setting on its legs by means of a foundation of brickwork. Once up, however, it was a great resource in the summer months, and much of Dickens's work was done there. "I have put five mirrors in the châlet where I write,"[225] he told an American friend,[212] "and they reflect and refract, in all kinds of ways, the leaves that are quivering at the windows, and the great fields of waving corn, and the sail-dotted river. My room is up among the branches of the trees; and the birds and the butterflies fly in and out, and the green branches shoot in at the open windows, and the lights and shadows of the clouds come and go with the rest of the company. The scent of the flowers, and indeed of everything that is growing for miles and miles, is most delicious." He used to make great boast, too, not only of his crowds of singing birds all day, but of his nightingales at night.
Belonging to the house, but unfortunately located on the other side of the busy road, was a shrubbery, well-wooded yet in a desolate state, where two magnificent cedars stood. After getting permission from the local authorities in 1859 for the necessary underground work, Dickens built a passage beneath the road[223] from his front lawn. In the[211] shrubbery that became accessible, which he later arranged very nicely, he installed a Swiss châlet[224] gifted to him by Mr. Fechter. It arrived from Paris in ninety-four pieces that fit together like a puzzle, but it turned out to be somewhat expensive to set up on a brick foundation. Once it was up, however, it became a great retreat in the summer months, and much of Dickens's work was done there. "I have put five mirrors in the châlet where I write,"[225] he told an American friend,[212] "and they reflect and refract, in so many ways, the leaves fluttering at the windows, the vast fields of waving corn, and the river dotted with sails. My room is nestled among the branches of the trees; and the birds and butterflies come in and out, and the green branches reach in through the open windows, while the changing light and shadow of the clouds join the scene. The scent of the flowers, and truly everything growing for miles around, is absolutely delightful." He often boasted not only about the many singing birds he had all day but also about the nightingales at night.

One or two more extracts from letters having reference to these changes may show something of the interest to him with which Gadshill thus grew under his hands. A sun-dial on his back-lawn had a bit of historic interest about it. "One of the balustrades of[213] the destroyed old Rochester Bridge," he wrote to his daughter in June 1859, "has been (very nicely) presented to me by the contractors for the works, and has been duly stone-masoned and set up on the lawn behind the house. I have ordered a sun-dial for the top of it, and it will be a very good object indeed." "When you come down here next month," he wrote to me, "we have an idea that we shall show you rather[214] a neat house. What terrific adventures have been in action; how many overladen vans were knocked up at Gravesend, and had to be dragged out of Chalk-turnpike in the dead of the night by the whole equine power of this establishment; shall be revealed at another time." That was in the autumn of 1860, when, on the sale of his London house, its contents were transferred to his country home. "I shall have an alteration or two to show you at Gadshill that greatly improve the little property; and when I get the workmen out this time, I think I'll leave off." October 1861 had now come, when the new bedrooms were built; but in the same month of 1863 he announced his transformation of the old coach-house. "I shall have a small new improvement to show you at Gads, which I think you will accept as the crowning ingenuity of the inimitable." But of course it was not over yet. "My small work and planting," he wrote in the spring of 1866, "really, truly, and positively the last, are nearly at an end in these regions, and the result will await summer inspection." No, nor even yet. He afterwards obtained, by exchange of some land with the trustees of Watts's Charity, the much coveted meadow at the back of the house of which heretofore he had the lease only; and he was then able to plant a number of young limes and chestnuts and other quick-growing trees. He had already planted a row of limes in front. He had no idea, he would say, of planting only for the benefit of posterity, but would put into the ground what he might himself enjoy the sight and shade of. He put them in two or three clumps in the meadow, and in a belt all round.[215]
One or two more excerpts from letters related to these changes may show some of the interest he had in how Gadshill developed under his care. A sun-dial on his backyard had a bit of historical interest attached to it. "One of the balustrades of[213] the destroyed old Rochester Bridge," he wrote to his daughter in June 1859, "has been (very nicely) given to me by the contractors for the works, and it has been properly stone-masoned and set up on the lawn behind the house. I've ordered a sun-dial for the top of it, and it will be a really nice addition." "When you come down here next month," he wrote to me, "we think we’ll show you quite[214] a nice house. What incredible adventures have happened; how many overloaded vans got stuck at Gravesend and had to be dragged out of Chalk-turnpike in the dead of the night by all the horses at this place; those stories will be told another time." That was in the autumn of 1860, when, after selling his London house, its contents were moved to his country home. "I’ll have a couple of changes to show you at Gadshill that greatly enhance the little property; and when I get the workers out this time, I think I'll stop." October 1861 had now arrived, when the new bedrooms were built; but in the same month of 1863 he announced his renovation of the old coach-house. "I'll have a small new improvement to show you at Gads, which I think you will see as the pinnacle of cleverness." But of course, it wasn't over yet. "My small work and planting," he wrote in the spring of 1866, "really, truly, and positively the last, are nearly finished in these areas, and the results will be ready for summer inspection." Not yet though. He later secured, by trading some land with the trustees of Watts's Charity, the much-desired meadow behind the house, which he previously only had a lease for; and he was then able to plant several young limes and chestnuts and other fast-growing trees. He had already planted a row of limes in front. He would say he had no intention of planting only for future generations, but wanted to put in the ground what he could enjoy seeing and having shade from. He placed them in two or three clusters in the meadow, and in a belt all around.[215]
Still there were "more last words," for the limit was only to be set by his last year of life. On abandoning his notion, after the American Readings, of exchanging Gadshill for London, a new staircase was put up from the hall; a parquet floor laid on the first landing; and a conservatory built, opening into both drawing-room and dining-room, "glass and iron," as he described it, "brilliant but expensive, with foundations as of an ancient Roman work of horrible solidity." This last addition had long been an object of desire with him; though he would hardly even now have given himself the indulgence but for the golden shower from America. He saw it first in a completed state on the Sunday before his death, when his younger daughter was on a visit to him. "Well, Katey," he said to her, "now you see positively the last improvement at Gadshill;" and every one laughed at the joke against himself. The success of the new conservatory was unquestionable. It was the remark of all around him that he was certainly, from this last of his improvements, drawing more enjoyment than from any of its predecessors, when the scene for ever closed.
Still, there were "more final words," since the only limit was his last year of life. After giving up on the idea of swapping Gadshill for London following the American Readings, a new staircase was built from the hall; a parquet floor was installed on the first landing; and a conservatory was constructed, connecting both the drawing-room and dining-room, "glass and iron," as he put it, "bright but costly, with foundations resembling an ancient Roman structure of terrible solidity." This final addition had long been something he desired; although he probably wouldn’t have allowed himself this luxury if not for the financial windfall from America. He first saw it fully completed on the Sunday before he died, when his younger daughter was visiting him. "Well, Katey," he said to her, "now you can see definitely the last improvement at Gadshill;" and everyone laughed at the joke he made at his own expense. The success of the new conservatory was undeniable. Those around him remarked that he was certainly enjoying this last addition more than any of his previous improvements when the moment finally ended.

Of the course of his daily life in the country there is not much to be said. Perhaps there was never a man who changed places so much and habits so little. He was always methodical and regular; and passed his life from day to day, divided for the most part between working and walking, the same wherever he was. The only exception was when special or infrequent visitors were with him. When such friends as Longfellow and his daughters, or Charles Eliot Norton and his wife, came, or when Mr. Fields brought his wife and Professor[216] Lowell's daughter, or when he received other Americans to whom he owed special courtesy, he would compress into infinitely few days an enormous amount of sight seeing and country enjoyment, castles, cathedrals, and fortified lines, lunches and picnics among cherry orchards and hop-gardens, excursions to Canterbury or Maidstone and their beautiful neighbourhoods, Druid-stone and Blue Bell Hill. "All the neighbouring country that could be shown in so short a time," he wrote of the Longfellow visit, "they saw. I turned out a couple of postilions in the old red jackets of the old red royal Dover road for our ride, and it was like a holiday ride in England fifty years ago." For Lord Lytton he did the same, for the Emerson Tennents, for Mr. Layard and Mr. Helps, for Lady[217] Molesworth and the Higginses (Jacob Omnium), and such other less frequent visitors.
Not much can be said about his daily life in the country. Perhaps there was never a man who changed locations so often yet kept his habits so consistent. He was always organized and punctual; his days blended into one another, mostly split between work and walks, no matter where he was. The only exceptions were when he had special or infrequent visitors. When friends like Longfellow and his daughters, or Charles Eliot Norton and his wife visited, or when Mr. Fields brought his wife and Professor Lowell's daughter, or when he welcomed other Americans to whom he felt a particular obligation, he would pack a tremendous amount of sightseeing and enjoyment into just a few days—exploring castles, cathedrals, and defensive sites, having lunches and picnics among cherry orchards and hop gardens, and taking trips to Canterbury or Maidstone and their lovely surroundings, including Druid-stone and Blue Bell Hill. "All the neighboring countryside that could be shown in such a short time," he wrote about the Longfellow visit, "they saw. I turned out a couple of postilions in the old red jackets from the old royal Dover road for our ride, and it felt like a holiday ride in England fifty years ago." He did the same for Lord Lytton, for the Emerson Tennents, for Mr. Layard and Mr. Helps, for Lady Molesworth and the Higginses (Jacob Omnium), and for various other less frequent visitors.
Excepting on such particular occasions however, and not always even then, his mornings were reserved wholly to himself; and he would generally preface his morning work (such was his love of order in everything around him) by seeing that all was in its place in the several rooms, visiting also the dogs, stables, and kitchen garden, and closing, unless the weather was very bad indeed, with a turn or two round the meadow before settling to his desk. His dogs were a great enjoyment to him;[226] and, with his high road traversed[218] as frequently as any in England by tramps and wayfarers of a singularly undesirable description, they were also a necessity. There were always two, of the mastiff kind, but latterly the number increased. His own favourite was Turk, a noble animal, full of affection and intelligence, whose death by a railway-accident, shortly after the Staplehurst catastrophe, caused him great grief. Turk's sole companion up to that date was Linda, puppy of a great St. Bernard brought over by Mr. Albert Smith, and grown into a superbly beautiful creature. After Turk there was an interval of an Irish dog, Sultan, given by Mr. Percy Fitzgerald; a cross between a St. Bernard and a bloodhound, built and coloured like a lioness and of splendid proportions, but of such indomitably aggressive propensities, that, after breaking his kennel-chain and nearly devouring a luckless little sister of one of the servants, he had to be killed. Dickens always protested that Sultan was a Fenian, for that no dog, not a secretly sworn member of that body, would ever have made such a point, muzzled as he was, of rushing at and bearing down with fury anything in scarlet with the remotest resemblance to a British uniform. Sultan's successor was Don, presented by Mr. Frederic Lehmann, a grand Newfoundland brought over very young, who with Linda became parent to a couple of Newfoundlands, that were still gambolling about their master, huge, though hardly out of puppydom, when they lost him. He had given to one of them the name of Bumble, from having observed, as he described it, "a peculiarly pompous and overbearing manner he had of appearing to mount guard over the yard when he was an absolute[219] infant." Bumble was often in scrapes. Describing to Mr. Fields a drought in the summer of 1868, when their poor supply of ponds and surface wells had become waterless, he wrote: "I do not let the great dogs swim in the canal, because the people have to drink of it. But when they get into the Medway, it is hard to get them out again. The other day Bumble (the son, Newfoundland dog) got into difficulties among some floating timber, and became frightened. Don (the father) was standing by me, shaking off the wet and looking on carelessly, when all of a sudden he perceived something amiss, and went in with a bound and brought Bumble out by the ear. The scientific way in which he towed him along was charming." The description of his own reception, on his reappearance after America, by Bumble and his brother, by the big and beautiful Linda, and by his daughter Mary's handsome little Pomeranian, may be added from his letters to the same correspondent. "The two Newfoundland dogs coming to meet me, with the usual carriage and the usual driver, and beholding me coming in my usual dress out at the usual door, it struck me that their recollection of my having been absent for any unusual time was at once cancelled. They behaved (they are both young dogs) exactly in their usual manner; coming behind the basket phaeton as we trotted along, and lifting their heads to have their ears pulled, a special attention which they receive from no one else. But when I drove into the stable-yard, Linda (the St. Bernard) was greatly excited; weeping profusely, and throwing herself on her back that she might caress my foot with her great fore-paws. Mary's[220] little dog too, Mrs. Bouncer, barked in the greatest agitation on being called down and asked by Mary, 'Who is this?' and tore round and round me like the dog in the Faust outlines." The father and mother and their two sons, four formidable-looking companions, were with him generally in his later walks.
Except on specific occasions, and not always then, his mornings were entirely for himself. He usually started his morning routine—reflecting his love of order—by ensuring everything was in its place in the various rooms. He also checked on the dogs, stables, and kitchen garden, and unless the weather was really bad, he would take a couple of laps around the meadow before sitting down at his desk. His dogs brought him a lot of joy; plus, considering the frequent presence of unwelcoming travelers on the nearby road, they were a necessity. There were always two mastiffs, but the number eventually grew. His favorite was Turk, a noble dog full of affection and intelligence, whose death in a railway accident shortly after the Staplehurst disaster caused him deep sorrow. Up until then, Turk's only companion was Linda, a puppy from a St. Bernard that Mr. Albert Smith had brought over, who grew into a stunning dog. After Turk, there was an Irish dog named Sultan, given by Mr. Percy Fitzgerald; a mix of a St. Bernard and a bloodhound, he was built and colored like a lioness and was beautifully proportioned. However, he had such aggressive tendencies that after breaking his kennel chain and nearly attacking a young servant's little sister, he had to be put down. Dickens often insisted that Sultan was a Fenian, believing that no dog not secretly sworn to that group would have shown such a fierce instinct to attack anything in red resembling a British uniform. Sultan was succeeded by Don, a magnificent Newfoundland given by Mr. Frederic Lehmann, who was brought over at a young age. He and Linda became the parents of a couple of Newfoundlands that were still bouncing around their master, huge but still puppies when they lost him. He named one Bumble, having observed "a particularly pompous and overbearing manner he had of appearing to mount guard over the yard when he was just a baby." Bumble often got into trouble. While recounting a drought in the summer of 1868, when their poor ponds and surface wells had run dry, he wrote to Mr. Fields: "I don’t let the big dogs swim in the canal because people have to drink from it. But when they get into the Medway, it’s hard to get them out again. The other day, Bumble (the son, Newfoundland dog) got into trouble among some floating logs and became scared. Don (the father) was standing next to me, shaking off water and watching lazily, when suddenly he noticed something was wrong and leapt in to pull Bumble out by the ear. The way he towed him along was charming." He also described his return from America in his letters, detailing how Bumble and his brother, the large and beautiful Linda, along with his daughter Mary’s adorable little Pomeranian, greeted him. "The two Newfoundland dogs came to meet me, along with the usual carriage and driver. Seeing me in my regular outfit come through the usual door, it struck me that they completely forgot about my absence. They acted (both being young dogs) just as they normally did, running behind the basket carriage while we trotted along and lifting their heads to have their ears scratched, a special attention they get from no one else. But when I drove into the stable yard, Linda (the St. Bernard) got extremely excited; she was crying and rolled onto her back to rub against my foot with her big front paws. Mary’s little dog, Mrs. Bouncer, also barked with great excitement when she was called down and asked by Mary, 'Who is this?' She raced around me like the dog in the Faust illustrations." In his later walks, he usually had his father, mother, and their two sons—four imposing companions—by his side.
Round Cobham, skirting the park and village and passing the Leather Bottle famous in the page of Pickwick, was a favourite walk with Dickens. By Rochester and the Medway, to the Chatham Lines, was another. He would turn out of Rochester High-street through The Vines (where some old buildings, from one of which called Restoration-house he took Satis-house for Great Expectations, had a curious attraction for him), would pass round by Fort Pitt, and coming back by Frindsbury would bring himself by some cross fields again into the high road. Or, taking the other side, he would walk through the marshes to Gravesend, return by Chalk church, and stop always to have greeting with a comical old monk who for some incomprehensible reason sits carved in stone, cross-legged with a jovial pot, over the porch of that sacred edifice. To another drearier churchyard, itself forming part of the marshes beyond the Medway, he often took friends to show them the dozen small tombstones of various sizes adapted to the respective ages of a dozen small children of one family which he made part of his story of Great Expectations, though, with the reserves always necessary in copying nature not to overstep her modesty by copying too closely, he makes the number that appalled little Pip not more than half the reality. About the whole of this Cooling churchyard, indeed,[221] and the neighbouring castle ruins, there was a weird strangeness that made it one of his attractive walks in the late year or winter, when from Higham he could get to it across country over the stubble fields; and, for a shorter summer walk, he was not less fond of going round the village of Shorne, and sitting on a hot afternoon in its pretty shaded churchyard. But on the[222] whole, though Maidstone had also much that attracted him to its neighbourhood, the Cobham neighbourhood was certainly that which he had greatest pleasure in; and he would have taken oftener than he did the walk through Cobham park and woods, which was the last he enjoyed before life suddenly closed upon him, but that here he did not like his dogs to follow.
Round Cobham, skirting the park and village and passing the Leather Bottle made famous in the pages of Pickwick, was a favorite walk for Dickens. Another route he enjoyed was by Rochester and the Medway, leading to the Chatham Lines. He would leave Rochester High Street through The Vines (where some old buildings, particularly one called Restoration-house that inspired Satis-house in Great Expectations, held a strange fascination for him), go around Fort Pitt, and return through Frindsbury, crossing some fields back to the main road. Alternatively, he would walk through the marshes to Gravesend, return via Chalk church, and always stop to greet a quirky old monk carved in stone, sitting cross-legged with a cheerful pot over the porch of that sacred building for reasons that remain unclear. He often took friends to a much gloomier graveyard, which was part of the marshes beyond the Medway, to show them the dozen small gravestones of various sizes dedicated to a dozen little children from one family. He included this in his story of Great Expectations, though, with the usual caution required in portraying reality without being too explicit, the number that terrified little Pip was only about half of the actual count. There was indeed a strange eeriness about the whole Cooling churchyard and the nearby castle ruins, making it one of his favorite walks in late fall or winter, when he could reach it from Higham across the stubble fields. For a shorter summer stroll, he also loved wandering around the village of Shorne, often sitting in its lovely shaded graveyard on hot afternoons. However, overall, even though Maidstone also had many appealing features, the Cobham area brought him the most joy. He would have gone for the walk through Cobham park and woods more often than he did, which was the last he enjoyed before life unexpectedly ended, but he didn’t like his dogs to follow him there.
Don now has his home there with Lord Darnley, and Linda lies under one of the cedars at Gadshill.
Don now lives there with Lord Darnley, and Linda rests under one of the cedars at Gadshill.
CHAPTER IX.
FIRST PAID READINGS.
1858-1859.
Dickens gave his paid public Readings successively, with not long intervals, at four several dates; in 1858-9, in 1861-63, in 1866-67, and in 1868-70; the first series under Mr. Arthur Smith's management, the second under Mr. Headland's, and the third and fourth, in America as well as before and after it, under that of Mr. George Dolby, who, excepting in America, acted for the Messrs. Chappell. The references in the present chapter are to the first series only.
Dickens held his paid public Readings multiple times, with only short breaks between them, on four different occasions: in 1858-9, in 1861-63, in 1866-67, and in 1868-70. The first series was managed by Mr. Arthur Smith, the second by Mr. Headland, and the third and fourth, both in America and elsewhere, were managed by Mr. George Dolby, who, except in America, worked for the Messrs. Chappell. The references in this chapter are only about the first series.
It began with sixteen nights at St. Martin's Hall, the first on the 29th of April, the last on the 22nd of July, 1858; and there was afterwards a provincial tour of 87 readings, beginning at Clifton on the 2nd of August, ending at Brighton on the 13th of November, and taking in Ireland and Scotland as well as the principal English cities: to which were added, in London, three Christmas readings, three in January, with two in the following month; and, in the provinces in the month[224] of October, fourteen, beginning at Ipswich and Norwich, taking in Cambridge and Oxford, and closing with Birmingham and Cheltenham. The series had comprised altogether 125 Readings when it ended on the 27th of October, 1859; and without the touches of character and interest afforded by his letters written while thus employed, the picture of the man would not be complete.
It started with sixteen nights at St. Martin's Hall, the first on April 29th and the last on July 22nd, 1858; then there was a provincial tour of 87 readings, kicking off in Clifton on August 2nd and wrapping up in Brighton on November 13th, covering Ireland and Scotland as well as the major English cities: in London, there were three Christmas readings, three in January, and two the following month; then in the provinces in October, there were fourteen more, starting in Ipswich and Norwich, hitting Cambridge and Oxford, and finishing in Birmingham and Cheltenham. The series totaled 125 readings when it concluded on October 27th, 1859; and without the character and interest captured in his letters written during this time, the picture of the man wouldn't be complete.
Here was one day's work at the opening which will show something of the fatigue they involved even at their outset. "On Friday we came from Shrewsbury to Chester; saw all right for the evening; and then went to Liverpool. Came back from Liverpool and read at Chester. Left Chester at 11 at night, after the reading, and went to London. Got to Tavistock House at 5 a.m. on Saturday, left it at a quarter past 10 that morning, and came down here" (Gadshill: 15th of August 1858).
Here’s a glimpse of one day’s work at the opening, which illustrates the level of fatigue they faced even from the beginning. "On Friday, we traveled from Shrewsbury to Chester; everything went smoothly for the evening; then we went to Liverpool. After returning from Liverpool, we did a reading in Chester. We left Chester at 11 at night after the reading and headed to London. We arrived at Tavistock House at 5 AM on Saturday, left it at a quarter past 10 that morning, and came down here" (Gadshill: 15th of August 1858).
The "greatest personal affection and respect" had greeted him everywhere. Nothing could have been "more strongly marked or warmly expressed;" and the readings had "gone" quite wonderfully. What in this respect had most impressed him, at the outset of his adventures, was Exeter. "I think they were the finest audience I ever read to; I don't think I ever read in some respects so well; and I never beheld anything like the personal affection which they poured out upon me at the end. I shall always look back upon it with pleasure." He often lost his voice in these early days, having still to acquire the art of husbanding it; and in the trial to recover it would again waste its power. "I think I sang half the Irish melodies to myself as I walked about, to test it."[225]
The "greatest personal affection and respect" welcomed him everywhere. Nothing could have been "more strongly marked or warmly expressed," and the readings had "gone" really wonderfully. What impressed him most, at the beginning of his adventures, was Exeter. "I think they were the best audience I ever read to; I don't think I ever read as well in some respects; and I never saw anything like the personal affection they showed me at the end. I will always look back on it with pleasure." He often lost his voice in those early days, still learning how to manage it; and when trying to recover it, he would again drain its strength. "I think I sang half the Irish melodies to myself as I walked around, to test it."[225]
An audience of two thousand three hundred people (the largest he had had) greeted him at Liverpool on his way to Dublin, and, besides the tickets sold, more than two hundred pounds in money was taken at the doors. This taxed his business staff a little. "They turned away hundreds, sold all the books, rolled on the ground of my room knee-deep in checks, and made a perfect pantomime of the whole thing." (20th of August.) He had to repeat the reading thrice.[227]
An audience of two thousand three hundred people (the largest he had ever had) welcomed him in Liverpool on his way to Dublin, and in addition to the tickets sold, over two hundred pounds was collected at the doors. This put some pressure on his business team. "They turned away hundreds, sold all the books, were knee-deep in checks rolling around on the floor of my room, and created a complete spectacle of the whole thing." (20th of August.) He had to repeat the reading three times.[227]
It was the first time he had seen Ireland, and Dublin greatly surprised him by appearing to be so much larger and more populous than he had supposed. He found it to have altogether an unexpectedly thriving look, being pretty nigh as big, he first thought, as Paris; of which some places in it, such as the quays on the river, reminded him. Half the first day he was there, he took to explore it; walking till tired, and then taking a car. "Power, dressed for the character of Teddy the Tiler, drove me: in a suit of patches, and with his hat unbrushed for twenty years. Wonderfully pleasant, light, intelligent, and careless."[228] The number of common[226] people he saw in his drive, "also riding about in cars as hard as they could split," brought to his recollection a more distant scene, and but for the dresses he could have thought himself on the Toledo at Naples.
It was the first time he had seen Ireland, and Dublin really surprised him by seeming much larger and more populated than he had imagined. He found it to have a surprisingly vibrant vibe, looking almost as big, he first thought, as Paris; some areas, like the quays by the river, reminded him of it. Half of his first day there, he spent exploring, walking until he got tired, and then taking a car. "Power, dressed as Teddy the Tiler, drove me: in a patched-up suit and with his hat unbrushed for twenty years. He was wonderfully pleasant, light, intelligent, and carefree." The number of regular folks he saw during his ride, "also zooming around in cars as fast as they could go," reminded him of a scene from long ago, and if it weren't for their clothing, he could have thought he was on the Toledo in Naples.
In respect of the number of his audience, and their reception of him, Dublin was one of his marked successes. He came to have some doubt of their capacity of receiving the pathetic, but of their quickness as to the humorous there could be no question, any more than of their heartiness. He got on wonderfully well with the Dublin people.[229] The Boots at Morrison's expressed the general feeling in a patriotic point of[227] view. "He was waiting for me at the hotel door last night. 'Whaat sart of a hoose sur?' he asked me. 'Capital.' 'The Lard be praised fur the 'onor 'o Dooblin!'" Within the hotel, on getting up next morning, he had a dialogue with a smaller resident, landlord's son he supposed, a little boy of the ripe age of six, which he presented, in his letter to his sister-in-law, as a colloquy between Old England and Young Ireland inadequately reported for want of the "imitation" it required for its full effect. "I am sitting on the sofa, writing, and find him sitting beside me.
In terms of the size of his audience and how they received him, Dublin was one of his clear successes. He started to doubt their ability to appreciate the emotional moments, but there was no question about their quickness when it came to humor, just as there was no doubt about their enthusiasm. He connected really well with the people of Dublin.[229] The Boots at Morrison's summed up the general sentiment from a patriotic perspective. "He was waiting for me at the hotel door last night. 'What kind of a place is it, sir?' he asked me. 'Great.' 'Thank God for the honor of Dublin!'" Inside the hotel, when he got up the next morning, he had a conversation with a younger resident, whom he assumed was the landlord's son, a little boy about six years old. He later described this exchange in a letter to his sister-in-law, presenting it as a dialogue between Old England and Young Ireland, though he felt it was poorly conveyed due to a lack of the necessary "imitation" to capture its full impact. "I am sitting on the sofa, writing, and I see him sitting beside me."
"Old England. Halloa old chap.
"Old England." Hey, old friend.
"Young Ireland. Hal—loo!
"Young Ireland. Hello!"
"Old England (in his delightful way). What a nice old fellow you are. I am very fond of little boys.
"Old England (in his delightful way). What a nice old guy you are. I really like little boys."
"Young Ireland. Air yes? Ye'r right.
"Youth of Ireland." Is that right?
"Old England. What do you learn, old fellow?
"Old England. What do you find out, my friend?"
"Young Ireland (very intent on Old England, and always childish except in his brogue). I lairn wureds of three sillibils—and wureds of two sillibils—and wureds of one sillibil.
"Young Ireland (very focused on Old England, and always immature except in his accent). I learn words of three syllables—and words of two syllables—and words of one syllable."
"Old England (cheerfully). Get out, you humbug! You learn only words of one syllable.
"Old England (cheerfully). Get lost, you fraud! You only know words with one syllable."
"Young Ireland (laughs heartily). You may say that it is mostly wureds of one sillibil.
"Young Ireland (laughs heartily). You could say that it’s mostly words of one syllable."
"Old England. Can you write?
"Old England." Can you write?
"Young Ireland, Not yet. Things comes by deegrays.
"Young Ireland, Not yet. Things come gradually."
"Old England. Can you cipher?
"Old England. Can you read?"
"Young Ireland (very quickly). Whaat's that?
"Young Ireland (really fast). What's that?"
"Old England. Can you make figures?
"Old England. Can you create figures?"
"Young Ireland. I can make a nought, which is not asy, being roond.[228]
"Young Ireland. I can draw a zero, which isn't easy because it's round.[228]
"Old England. I say, old boy! Wasn't it you I saw on Sunday morning in the Hall, in a soldier's cap? You know!—In a soldier's cap?
"Old England. Hey, buddy! Wasn't it you I saw on Sunday morning in the Hall, wearing a soldier's cap? You know!—In a soldier's cap?"
"Young Ireland (cogitating deeply). Was it a very good cap?
"Young Ireland (thinking hard). Was it a really good cap?"
"Old England. Yes.
England. Yes.
"Young Ireland. Did it fit ankommon?
"Young Ireland. Did it fit common?"
"Old England. Yes.
"England today. Yes."
"Young Ireland. Dat was me!"
"Young Ireland. That was me!"
The last night in Dublin was an extraordinary scene. "You can hardly imagine it. All the way from the hotel to the Rotunda (a mile), I had to contend against the stream of people who were turned away. When I got there, they had broken the glass in the pay-boxes, and were offering £5 freely for a stall. Half of my platform had to be taken down, and people heaped in among the ruins. You never saw such a scene."[230] But he would not return after his other Irish engagements. "I have positively said No. The work is too hard. It is not like doing it in one easy room, and always the same room. With a different place every night, and a different audience with its own peculiarity every night, it is a tremendous strain. . . . I seem to be always either in a railway carriage or reading, or going to bed; and I get so knocked up whenever I have a minute to remember it, that then I go to bed as a matter of course."
The last night in Dublin was an incredible sight. "You can hardly imagine it. All the way from the hotel to the Rotunda (a mile), I had to fight against the crowd of people who were turned away. When I arrived, they had smashed the glass in the pay-boxes and were offering £5 for a spot. Half of my platform had to be taken down, and people were packed in among the wreckage. You'd never believe such a scene." [230] But he wouldn't come back after his other Irish engagements. "I have definitely said no. The work is too demanding. It's not like performing in one comfortable room every time. With a different venue each night, and a new audience with its unique quirks every time, it's a huge strain. ... I feel like I'm either in a train carriage or reading, or getting ready for bed; and I get so worn out that whenever I do get a moment to think about it, I just go to bed without a second thought."
Belfast he liked quite as much as Dublin in another way. "A fine place with a rough people; everything looking prosperous; the railway ride from Dublin quite amazing in the order, neatness, and cleanness of all you see; every cottage looking as if it had been whitewashed the day before; and many with charming gardens, prettily kept with bright flowers." The success, too, was quite as great. "Enormous audiences. We turn away half the town.[231] I think them a better audience on the whole than Dublin; and the personal affection is something overwhelming. I wish you and the dear girls" (he is writing to his sister-in-law) "could have seen the people look at me in the street; or heard them ask me, as I hurried to the hotel after the reading last night, to 'do me the honor to shake hands Misther Dickens and God bless you sir; not ounly for the light you've been to me this night, but for the light you've been in mee house sir (and God love your face!) this many a year!'"[232] He had never seen men "go in to cry so undisguisedly," as they did at the Belfast Dombey reading; and as to the Boots and Mrs. Gamp "it was just one roar with me and them. For they made me laugh so, that sometimes I could not compose my face to go on." His greatest trial in this way however[230] was a little later at Harrogate—"the queerest place, with the strangest people in it, leading the oddest lives of dancing, newspaper-reading, and tables d'hôte"—where he noticed, at the same reading, embodiments respectively of the tears and laughter to which he has moved his fellow creatures so largely. "There was one gentleman at the Little Dombey yesterday morning" (he is still writing to his sister-in-law) "who exhibited—or rather concealed—the profoundest grief. After crying a good deal without hiding it, he covered his face with both his hands, and laid it down on the back of the seat before him, and really shook with emotion. He was not in mourning, but I supposed him to have lost some child in old time. . . . There was a remarkably good fellow too, of thirty or so, who found something so very ludicrous in Toots that he could not compose himself at all, but laughed until he sat wiping his eyes with his handkerchief; and whenever he felt Toots coming again, he began to laugh and wipe his eyes afresh; and when Toots came once more, he gave a kind of cry, as if it were too much for him. It was uncommonly droll, and made me laugh heartily."
Belfast appealed to him just as much as Dublin, but in a different way. "A great place with tough people; everything seems prosperous; the train ride from Dublin is amazing because of the order, neatness, and cleanliness of everything you see; every cottage looks like it was just whitewashed; and many have lovely gardens, beautifully maintained with bright flowers." The success there was equally impressive. "Huge crowds. We could turn away half the town.[231] I think they're a better audience overall than Dublin; and the personal affection I receive is overwhelming. I wish you and the dear girls" (he's writing to his sister-in-law) "could have seen how people looked at me in the street; or heard them ask me, as I rushed to the hotel after the reading last night, to 'do me the honor of shaking hands, Mr. Dickens, and God bless you, sir; not only for the light you've been to me tonight, but for the light you've been in my house, sir (and God love your face!) all these years!'"[232] He had never seen men "cry so openly" as they did at the Belfast Dombey reading; and regarding Boots and Mrs. Gamp, "it was just one big laugh between me and them. They made me laugh so much that sometimes I couldn't keep a straight face." His biggest challenge in this regard, however[230] was a little later in Harrogate—"the weirdest place, with the strangest people, living the oddest lives of dancing, reading newspapers, and dining communally"—where he noticed, at the same reading, embodiments of the tears and laughter he had inspired in so many. "There was one gentleman at the Little Dombey yesterday morning" (he's still writing to his sister-in-law) "who showed—or rather tried to hide—the deepest sorrow. After crying quite a bit without holding back, he covered his face with both hands and laid it down on the back of the seat in front of him, really shaking with emotion. He wasn't wearing mourning clothes, but I guessed he had lost a child long ago. . . . There was also a remarkably nice guy, around thirty, who found something so hilarious about Toots that he couldn't control himself at all, but laughed until he had to wipe his eyes with his handkerchief; and whenever he sensed Toots was coming again, he started laughing and wiping his eyes all over again; and when Toots appeared once more, he let out a sort of cry, as if it was too much for him. It was incredibly funny, and made me laugh heartily."
At Harrogate he read twice on one day (a Saturday), and had to engage a special engine to take him back that night to York, which, having reached at one o'clock in the morning, he had to leave, because of Sunday restrictions on travel, the same morning at half-past four, to enable him to fulfil a Monday's reading at Scarborough. Such fatigues became matters of course; but their effect, not noted at the time, was grave. "At York I had a most magnificent audience,[231] and might have filled the place for a week. . . . I think the audience possessed of a better knowledge of character than any I have seen. But I recollect Doctor Belcombe to have told me long ago that they first found out Charles Mathews's father, and to the last understood him (he used to say) better than any other people. . . . The let is enormous for next Saturday at Manchester, stalls alone four hundred! I shall soon be able to send you the list of places to the 15th of November, the end. I shall be, O most heartily glad, when that time comes! But I must say that the intelligence and warmth of the audiences are an immense sustainment, and one that always sets me up. Sometimes before I go down to read (especially when it is in the day), I am so oppressed by having to do it that I feel perfectly unequal to the task. But the people lift me out of this directly; and I find that I have quite forgotten everything but them and the book, in a quarter of an hour."
At Harrogate, he performed twice in one day (a Saturday) and had to hire a special train to get him back to York that night. He arrived at one o'clock in the morning but had to leave again due to Sunday travel restrictions at half-past four that same morning, so he could make a reading in Scarborough on Monday. These exhausting schedules became routine, but their impact, unnoticed at the time, was serious. "At York, I had a fantastic audience,[231] and I could have filled the venue for a week. . . . I think the audience had a better understanding of character than any I've ever seen. But I remember Doctor Belcombe told me long ago that they were the first to recognize Charles Mathews's father, and until the end, they understood him better than anyone else. . . . The demand is huge for next Saturday in Manchester, with just the stalls bringing in four hundred! I will soon be able to send you the list of places through November 15th, which is the end. I will be, oh, so very glad when that time arrives! But I must say that the intelligence and warmth of the audiences are a tremendous support, and it always lifts my spirits. Sometimes before I go on to read (especially during the day), I feel so overwhelmed by it that I think I'm not up to the task at all. But the people immediately lift me out of that mindset, and I find that within fifteen minutes, I've completely forgotten everything but them and the book."
The reception that awaited him at Manchester had very special warmth in it, occasioned by an adverse tone taken in the comment of one of the Manchester daily papers on the letter which by a breach of confidence had been then recently printed. "My violated letter" Dickens always called it. "When I came to Manchester on Saturday I found seven hundred stalls taken! When I went into the room at night 2500 people had paid, and more were being turned away from every door. The welcome they gave me was astounding in its affectionate recognition of the late trouble, and fairly for once unmanned me. I never saw such a sight or heard such a sound. When they[232] had thoroughly done it, they settled down to enjoy themselves; and certainly did enjoy themselves most heartily to the last minute." Nor, for the rest of his English tour, in any of the towns that remained, had he reason to complain of any want of hearty greeting. At Sheffield great crowds came in excess of the places. At Leeds the hall overflowed in half an hour. At Hull the vast concourse had to be addressed by Mr. Smith on the gallery stairs, and additional Readings had to be given, day and night, "for the people out of town and for the people in town."
The welcome he received in Manchester was incredibly warm, especially due to some negative comments in a local newspaper about a recently leaked letter. Dickens always referred to it as "my violated letter." "When I arrived in Manchester on Saturday, I found seven hundred tickets had been sold! By the time I entered the hall that night, 2,500 people had paid, and even more were being turned away at every entrance. The way they welcomed me was astonishing in its heartfelt recognition of my recent troubles and honestly left me a bit emotional. I had never seen or heard anything like it. Once the cheering died down, they relaxed and really enjoyed themselves right up to the last minute." Throughout the rest of his tour in England, he had no reason to complain about the warm receptions in any of the other towns. In Sheffield, huge crowds exceeded capacity. In Leeds, the hall was full within half an hour. In Hull, Mr. Smith had to address the large audience from the gallery stairs, and they had to schedule extra readings day and night, "for the people from out of town and for the locals."
The net profit to himself, thus far, had been upwards of three hundred pounds a week;[233] but this was nothing to the success in Scotland, where his profit in a week, with all expenses paid, was five hundred pounds. The pleasure was enhanced, too, by the presence of his two daughters, who had joined him over the Border. At first the look of Edinburgh was not promising. "We[233] began with, for us, a poor room. . . . But the effect of that reading (it was the Chimes) was immense; and on the next night, for Little Dombey, we had a full room. It is our greatest triumph everywhere. Next night (Poor Traveller, Boots, and Gamp) we turned away hundreds upon hundreds of people; and last night, for the Carol, in spite of advertisements in the morning that the tickets were gone, the people had to be got in through such a crowd as rendered it a work of the utmost difficulty to keep an alley into the room. They were seated about me on the platform, put into the doorway of the waiting-room, squeezed into every conceivable place, and a multitude turned away once more. I think I am better pleased with what was done in Edinburgh than with what has been done anywhere, almost. It was so completely taken by storm, and carried in spite of itself. Mary and Katey have been infinitely pleased and interested with Edinburgh. We are just going to sit down to dinner and therefore I cut my missive short. Travelling, dinner, reading, and everything else, come crowding together into this strange life."
The net profit for him so far had been over three hundred pounds a week;[233] but that was nothing compared to the success in Scotland, where his profit in a week, after all expenses, was five hundred pounds. The enjoyment was also heightened by the presence of his two daughters, who had accompanied him over the Border. At first, Edinburgh didn’t seem promising. "We[233] started with a pretty poor room for us. . . . But the impact of that reading (it was the Chimes) was huge; and the following night, for Little Dombey, we had a full house. It’s our biggest success everywhere. The next night (Poor Traveller, Boots, and Gamp) we turned away hundreds and hundreds of people; and last night, for the Carol, even though there were ads in the morning saying the tickets were sold out, we still had to get people in through such a crowd that it was extremely difficult to keep a path clear to the room. They were seated all around me on the platform, jammed into the doorway of the waiting room, squeezed into every possible spot, and a huge number were turned away again. I think I’m more pleased with what happened in Edinburgh than with anything else, almost. It was completely taken by storm, and it succeeded despite everything. Mary and Katey have been incredibly happy and fascinated with Edinburgh. We’re just about to sit down for dinner, so I’ll cut this short. Traveling, dinner, reading, and everything else is all piling up in this strange life."
Then came Dundee: "An odd place," he wrote, "like Wapping with high rugged hills behind it. We had the strangest journey here—bits of sea, and bits of railroad, alternately; which carried my mind back to travelling in America. The room is an immense new one, belonging to Lord Kinnaird, and Lord Panmure, and some others of that sort. It looks something between the Crystal-palace and Westminster-hall (I can't imagine who wants it in this place), and has never been tried yet for speaking in. Quite disinterestedly[234] of course, I hope it will succeed." The people he thought, in respect of taste and intelligence, below any other of his Scotch audiences; but they woke up surprisingly, and the rest of his Caledonian tour was a succession of triumphs. "At Aberdeen we were crammed to the street, twice in one day. At Perth (where I thought when I arrived, there literally could be nobody to come) the gentlefolk came posting in from thirty miles round, and the whole town came besides, and filled an immense hall. They were as full of perception, fire, and enthusiasm as any people I have seen. At Glasgow, where I read three evenings and one morning, we took the prodigiously large sum of six hundred pounds! And this at the Manchester prices, which are lower than St. Martin's Hall. As to the effect—I wish you could have seen them after Lilian died in the Chimes, or when Scrooge woke in the Carol and talked to the boy outside the window. And at the end of Dombey yesterday afternoon, in the cold light of day, they all got up, after a short pause, gentle and simple, and thundered and waved their hats with such astonishing heartiness and fondness that, for the first time in all my public career, they took me completely off my legs, and I saw the whole eighteen hundred of them reel to one side as if a shock from without had shaken the hall. Notwithstanding which, I must confess to you, I am very anxious to get to the end of my Readings, and to be at home again, and able to sit down and think in my own study. There has been only one thing quite without alloy. The dear girls have enjoyed themselves immensely, and their trip with me has been a great success."[235]
Then came Dundee: "A strange place," he wrote, "like Wapping with steep, rugged hills behind it. We had the oddest journey here—sometimes by sea, sometimes by train; it reminded me of traveling in America. The room is a huge new one, owned by Lord Kinnaird, Lord Panmure, and a few others like them. It looks like a mix between the Crystal Palace and Westminster Hall (I can't imagine who needs it here), and no one has spoken there yet. Quite selflessly, of course, I hope it works out." He thought the people, in terms of taste and intelligence, were below any of his other Scottish audiences; but they surprisingly came alive, and the rest of his Scottish tour was a series of triumphs. "In Aberdeen, we were packed to the streets, twice in one day. In Perth (where I thought when I arrived, literally no one would show up) the gentry came rushing in from thirty miles away, and the entire town joined in, filling an enormous hall. They were as perceptive, passionate, and enthusiastic as any crowd I've seen. In Glasgow, where I performed three evenings and one morning, we pulled in an incredible six hundred pounds! And this at Manchester prices, which are lower than St. Martin's Hall. As for the impact—I wish you could have seen them after Lilian died in the Chimes, or when Scrooge woke up in the Carol and talked to the boy outside the window. And at the end of Dombey yesterday afternoon, in the cold light of day, they all stood up after a brief pause, gentle and simple, and erupted with such astonishing enthusiasm and affection that, for the first time in all my public career, they completely lifted me off my feet, and I saw all eighteen hundred of them sway to one side as if a shock from outside had shaken the hall. Despite all that, I must confess I’m very eager to finish my Readings and get home again, able to sit down and think in my own study. There has been only one thing completely joyful. The dear girls have had an amazing time, and their trip with me has been a great success."
The subjects of his readings during this first circuit were the Carol, the Chimes, the Trial in Pickwick, the chapters containing Paul Dombey, Boots at the Holly Tree Inn, the Poor Traveller (Captain Doubledick), and Mrs. Gamp: to which he continued to restrict himself through the supplementary nights that closed in the autumn of 1859.[234] Of these the most successful in their uniform effect upon his audiences were undoubtedly the Carol, the Pickwick scene, Mrs. Gamp, and the Dombey—the quickness, variety, and completeness of his assumption of character, having greatest scope in these. Here, I think, more than in the pathos or graver level passages, his strength lay; but this is entitled to no weight other than as an individual opinion, and his audiences gave him many reasons for thinking differently.[235]
The subjects of his readings during this first tour were the Carol, the Chimes, the Trial in Pickwick, the chapters featuring Paul Dombey, Boots at the Holly Tree Inn, the Poor Traveller (Captain Doubledick), and Mrs. Gamp: to which he continued to limit himself throughout the additional nights that wrapped up in the fall of 1859.[234] Of these, the ones that had the most consistent impact on his audiences were definitely the Carol, the Pickwick scene, Mrs. Gamp, and the Dombey—the speed, variety, and depth of his character portrayal had the greatest expression in these. Here, I believe, more than in the emotional or more serious parts, his strength resided; but this is just my personal opinion, and his audiences provided him with plenty of reasons to think otherwise.[235]
The incidents of the period covered by this chapter that had any general interest in them, claim to be mentioned briefly. At the close of 1857 he presided at the fourth anniversary of the Warehousemen and Clerks' Schools, describing and discriminating, with keenest wit and kindliest fun, the sort of schools he[236] liked and he disliked. To the spring and summer of 1858 belongs the first collection of his writings into a succinct library form, each of the larger novels occupying two volumes. In March he paid warm public tribute to Thackeray (who had been induced to take the chair at the General Theatrical Fund) as one for whose genius he entertained the warmest admiration, who did honour to literature, and in whom literature was honoured. In May he presided at the Artists' Benevolent Fund dinner, and made striking appeal for that excellent charity. In July he took earnest part in the opening efforts on behalf of the Royal Dramatic College, which he supplemented later by a speech for the establishment of schools for actors' children; in which he took occasion to declare his belief that there were no institutions in England so socially liberal as its public schools, and that there was nowhere in the country so complete an absence of servility to mere rank, position, or riches. "A boy, there, is always what his abilities or his personal qualities make him. We may differ about the curriculum and other matters, but of the frank, free, manly, independent spirit preserved in our public schools, I apprehend there can be no kind of question." In December[236] he was entertained[237] at a public dinner in Coventry on the occasion of receiving, by way of thanks for help rendered to their Institute, a gold repeater of special construction by the watchmakers of the town; as to which he kept faithfully his pledge to the givers, that it should be thenceforward the inseparable companion of his workings and wanderings, and reckon off the future labours of his days until he should have done with the measurement of time. Within a day from this celebration, he presided at the Institutional Association of Lancashire and Cheshire in Manchester Free Trade Hall; gave prizes to candidates from a hundred and fourteen local mechanics' institutes affiliated to the Association; described in his most attractive language the gallant toiling fellows by whom the prizes had been won; and ended with the monition he never failed to couple with his eulogies of Knowledge, that it should follow the teaching of the Saviour, and not satisfy the understanding merely. "Knowledge has a very limited power when it informs the head only; but when it[238] informs the heart as well, it has a power over life and death, the body and the soul, and dominates the universe."
The events from this chapter that were generally interesting deserve a brief mention. At the end of 1857, he presided over the fourth anniversary of the Warehousemen and Clerks' Schools, cleverly and humorously describing the types of schools he liked and disliked. In the spring and summer of 1858, his first collection of writings was published in a concise library format, with each of the larger novels taking up two volumes. In March, he publicly praised Thackeray (who had been persuaded to chair the General Theatrical Fund) as someone whose genius he deeply admired, who honored literature, and in whom literature was honored. In May, he chaired the Artists' Benevolent Fund dinner, making a powerful appeal for that worthy charity. In July, he actively participated in the initial efforts to support the Royal Dramatic College, later giving a speech advocating for schools for actors' children. He took this opportunity to express his belief that no institutions in England were as socially progressive as its public schools and that there was a complete absence of servility to mere rank, position, or wealth. "A boy there is always valued for his abilities or personal qualities. We might disagree about the curriculum and other matters, but there can be no doubt about the frank, free, manly, independent spirit upheld in our public schools." In December, he was honored at a public dinner in Coventry for receiving a gold pocket watch with a special design from the local watchmakers, as a thank you for his support of their Institute. He faithfully promised the givers that it would be his constant companion in his work and travels, marking the future tasks of his days until he was no longer measuring time. Within a day of this celebration, he presided over the Institutional Association of Lancashire and Cheshire at Manchester Free Trade Hall; awarded prizes to candidates from 114 local mechanics' institutes affiliated with the Association; described in his most engaging language the hardworking individuals who won the prizes; and concluded with his usual reminder that knowledge should follow the teachings of the Savior and not serve merely to satisfy the intellect. "Knowledge has limited power if it only informs the mind; but when it also informs the heart, it possesses power over life and death, the body and the soul, and governs the universe."
This too was the year when Mr. Frith completed Dickens's portrait, and it appeared upon the walls of the Academy in the following spring. "I wish," said Edwin Landseer as he stood before it, "he looked less eager and busy, and not so much out of himself, or beyond himself. I should like to catch him asleep and quiet now and then." There is something in the objection, and he also would be envious at times of what he too surely knew could never be his lot. On the other hand who would willingly have lost the fruits of an activity on the whole so healthy and beneficent?
This was also the year when Mr. Frith finished Dickens's portrait, which was displayed at the Academy the following spring. "I wish," said Edwin Landseer as he stood in front of it, "that he looked less eager and busy, and not so out of himself or beyond himself. I'd like to see him asleep and calm every now and then." There’s some truth in that criticism, and at times he might feel envious of something he knew would never be his. But who would want to give up the benefits of such a generally healthy and positive activity?
CHAPTER X.
ALL THE YEAR ROUND AND THE UNCOMMERCIAL TRAVELLER.
1859-1861.
In the interval before the close of the first circuit of readings, painful personal disputes arising out of the occurrences of the previous year were settled by the discontinuance of Household Words, and the establishment in its place of All the Year Round. The disputes turned upon matters of feeling exclusively, and involved no charge on either side that would render any detailed reference here other than gravely out of place. The question into which the difference ultimately resolved itself was that of the respective rights of the parties as proprietors of Household Words; and this, upon a bill filed in Chancery, was settled by a winding-up order, under which the property was sold. It was bought by Dickens, who, even before the sale, exactly fulfilling a previous announcement of the proposed discontinuance[240] of the existing periodical and establishment of another in its place, precisely similar but under a different title, had started All the Year Round. It was to be regretted perhaps that he should have thought it necessary to move at all, but he moved strictly within his rights.
In the time before the first round of readings ended, painful personal conflicts from the incidents of the previous year were resolved by shutting down Household Words and launching All the Year Round instead. The disputes were purely emotional and didn’t involve any accusations that would make discussing them here inappropriate. The key issue that ultimately emerged was about the ownership rights of the parties involved as owners of Household Words; this was settled through a Chancery lawsuit, which resulted in a winding-up order, leading to the sale of the property. Dickens purchased it and, even before the sale was finalized, he had already made a clear announcement about discontinuing the current publication and starting another one that was exactly the same but under a different title, All the Year Round. It might have been better if he hadn't felt the need to take action at all, but he acted fully within his rights.
To the publishers first associated with his great success in literature, Messrs. Chapman and Hall, he now returned for the issue of the remainder of his books; of which he always in future reserved the copyrights, making each the subject of such arrangement as for the time might seem to him desirable. In this he was met by no difficulty; and indeed it will be only proper to add, that, in any points affecting his relations with those concerned in the production of his books, though his resentments were easily and quickly roused, they were never very lasting. The only fair rule therefore was, in a memoir of his life, to confine the mention of such things to what was strictly necessary to explain its narrative. This accordingly has been done; and, in the several disagreements it has been necessary to advert to, I cannot charge myself with having in a single instance overstepped the rule. Objection has been made to my revival of the early differences with Mr. Bentley. But silence respecting them was incompatible with what absolutely required to be said, if the picture of Dickens in his most interesting time, at the outset of his career in letters, was not to be omitted altogether; and, suppressing everything of mere temper that gathered round the dispute, use was made of those letters only containing the young writer's urgent appeal to be absolved, rightly or wrongly, from engagements he had too precipitately entered into. Wrongly, some might say,[241] because the law was undoubtedly on Mr. Bentley's side; but all subsequent reflection has confirmed the view I was led strongly to take at the time, that in the facts there had come to be involved what the law could not afford to overlook, and that the sale of brain-work can never be adjusted by agreement with the same exactness and certainty as that of ordinary goods and chattels. Quitting the subject once for all with this remark, it is not less incumbent on me to say that there was no stage of the dispute in which Mr. Bentley, holding as strongly the other view, might not think it to have sufficient justification; and certainly in later years there was no absence of friendly feeling on the part of Dickens to his old publisher. This already has been mentioned; and on the occasion of Hans Andersen's recent visit to Gadshill, Mr. Bentley was invited to meet the celebrated Dane. Nor should I omit to say, that, in the year to which this narrative has now arrived, his prompt compliance with an intercession made to him for a common friend pleased Dickens greatly.
To the publishers who first contributed to his significant success in literature, Messrs. Chapman and Hall, he now returned for the release of the rest of his books; he always retained the copyrights for these, making arrangements as he saw fit at the time. He encountered no difficulties in this, and it's worth noting that, while his irritations could easily flare up, they never lasted very long. Therefore, the only fair approach in a memoir about his life is to mention such matters only as necessary to clarify the narrative. This has been done, and in the various disagreements addressed, I cannot claim to have exceeded this guideline even once. Some have objected to my revisiting the early disputes with Mr. Bentley. However, ignoring them would contradict what needed to be shared if we were to depict Dickens during his most captivating times, at the start of his writing career. By omitting the petty grievances surrounding the conflict, I only referenced those letters where the young writer urgently appealed to be released, rightly or wrongly, from commitments he had hastily made. Some might argue it was wrong, as the law supported Mr. Bentley's position; but upon reflection, I've reaffirmed my strong original belief that the situation involved matters beyond what the law could simply ignore, and that the sale of creative work can never be settled with the same precision as that of ordinary goods. Closing this topic with that point, it's also important to mention that there was never a moment in the dispute during which Mr. Bentley, firmly believing in the opposite view, wouldn’t think he had adequate justification; and certainly, in later years, Dickens showed no lack of kindness to his former publisher. This has already been noted; and during Hans Andersen's recent visit to Gadshill, Mr. Bentley was invited to meet the renowned Dane. It's also worth mentioning that, in the year this narrative has reached, Dickens was quite pleased with Mr. Bentley's quick agreement to a request made on behalf of a mutual friend.
At the opening of 1859, bent upon such a successor to Household Words as should carry on the associations connected with its name, Dickens was deep in search of a title to give expression to them. "My determination to settle the title arises out of my knowledge that I shall never be able to do anything for the work until it has a fixed name; also out of my observation that the same odd feeling affects everybody else." He had proposed to himself a title that, as in Household Words, might be capable of illustration by a line from Shakespeare; and alighting upon that wherein poor Henry the Sixth is fain to solace his captivity by the fancy, that,[242] like birds encaged he might soothe himself for loss of liberty "at last by notes of household harmony," he for the time forgot that this might hardly be accepted as a happy comment on the occurrences out of which the supposed necessity had arisen of replacing the old by a new household friend. "Don't you think," he wrote on the 24th of January, "this is a good name and quotation? I have been quite delighted to get hold of it for our title.
At the beginning of 1859, determined to create a successor to Household Words that would continue the associations tied to its name, Dickens was deeply engaged in finding a title that would express them. "My decision to finalize the title comes from my understanding that I won't be able to accomplish anything for the work until it has a set name; it also stems from my observation that this unusual feeling affects everyone else." He had considered a title that could be illustrated with a line from Shakespeare, and came upon the one where poor Henry the Sixth tries to comfort himself in captivity with the idea that,[242] like caged birds, he might ease his loss of freedom "at last by notes of household harmony." For a moment, he overlooked that this might not be seen as an encouraging reflection on the events that led to the need for a new household companion to replace the old one. "Don’t you think," he wrote on January 24th, "this is a good name and quotation? I have been really pleased to have found it for our title."
"'At last by notes of Household Harmony.'—Shakespeare."
He was at first reluctant even to admit the objection when stated to him. "I am afraid we must not be too particular about the possibility of personal references and applications: otherwise it is manifest that I never can write another book. I could not invent a story of any sort, it is quite plain, incapable of being twisted into some such nonsensical shape. It would be wholly impossible to turn one through half a dozen chapters." Of course he yielded, nevertheless; and much consideration followed over sundry other titles submitted. Reviving none of those formerly rejected, here were a few of these now rejected in their turn. The Hearth. The Forge. The Crucible. The Anvil of the Time. Charles Dickens's Own. Seasonable Leaves. Evergreen Leaves. Home. Home-Music. Change. Time and Tide. Twopence. English Bells. Weekly Bells. The Rocket. Good Humour. Still the great want was the line adaptable from Shakespeare, which at last exultingly he sent on the 28th of January.[243]
He was initially hesitant to even acknowledge the objection when it was brought up. "I'm afraid we can't be too strict about personal references and applications; otherwise, it’s clear that I could never write another book. I simply can't come up with a story that could be twisted into something so ridiculous. It would be completely impossible to stretch one over half a dozen chapters." Of course, he eventually agreed; and a lot of thought followed regarding some other titles that were proposed. None of those previously rejected were brought back, but here are a few of the current ones being rejected. The Hearth. The Forge. The Crucible. The Anvil of Time. Charles Dickens's Own. Seasonal Leaves. Evergreen Leaves. Home. Home Music. Change. Time and Tide. Two Pence. English Bells. Weekly Bells. The Rocket. Good Humor. Still, the main need was the line that could be adapted from Shakespeare, which he ultimately triumphantly sent on January 28th.[243]
"I am dining early, before reading, and write literally with my mouth full. But I have just hit upon a name that I think really an admirable one—especially with the quotation before it, in the place where our present H. W. quotation stands.
"I’m eating early, before I read, and I’m literally writing with my mouth full. But I just came up with a name that I think is truly great—especially with the quotation before it, in the spot where our current H. W. quotation is."
"All Year Round.
"A weekly journal conducted by Charles Dickens."
With the same resolution and energy other things necessary to the adventure were as promptly done. "I have taken the new office," he wrote from Tavistock House on the 21st of February; "have got workmen in; have ordered the paper; settled with the printer; and am getting an immense system of advertising ready. Blow to be struck on the 12th of March. . . . Meantime I cannot please myself with the opening of my story" (the Tale of Two Cities, which All the Year Round was to start with), "and cannot in the least settle at it or take to it. . . . I wish you would come and look at what I flatter myself is a rather ingenious account to which I have turned the Stanfield scenery here." He had placed the Lighthouse scene in a single frame; had divided the scene of the Frozen Deep into two subjects, a British man-of-war and an Arctic sea, which he had also framed; and the school-room that had been the theatre was now hung with sea-pieces by a great painter of the sea. To believe them to have been but the amusement of a few mornings was difficult indeed. Seen from the due distance there was nothing wanting to the most masterly and elaborate art.[244]
With the same determination and effort, everything else needed for the adventure was quickly taken care of. "I've accepted the new position," he wrote from Tavistock House on February 21st; "I've got workers on site; I've ordered the paper; settled with the printer; and I'm preparing a massive advertising campaign. The launch will happen on March 12th... In the meantime, I can't get into the opening of my story" (the Tale of Two Cities, which All the Year Round was set to kick off with), "and I can't seem to focus on it or get into it at all... I wish you would come and check out what I think is a pretty clever setup I've created with the Stanfield scenery here." He had arranged the Lighthouse scene in one frame; divided the Frozen Deep scene into two parts, featuring a British warship and an Arctic sea, which he also framed; and the classroom that used to be the stage was now decorated with maritime paintings by a famous marine artist. It was hard to believe that these had only been the work of a few mornings. From the right distance, there was nothing lacking in the most skillful and intricate art.[244]
The first number of All the Year Round appeared on the 30th of April, and the result of the first quarter's accounts of the sale will tell everything that needs to be said of a success that went on without intermission to the close. "A word before I go back to Gadshill," he wrote from Tavistock House in July, "which I know you will be glad to receive. So well has All the Year Round gone that it was yesterday able to repay me, with five per cent. interest, all the money I advanced for its establishment (paper, print &c. all paid, down to the last number), and yet to leave a good £500 balance at the banker's!" Beside the opening of his Tale of Two Cities its first number had contained another piece of his writing, the "Poor Man and his Beer;" as to which an interesting note has been sent me. The Rev. T. B. Lawes, of Rothamsted, St. Alban's, had been associated upon a sanitary commission with Mr. Henry Austin, Dickens's brother-in-law and counsellor in regard to all such matters in his own houses, or in the houses of the poor; and this connection led to Dickens's knowledge of a club that Mr. Lawes had established at Rothamsted, which he became eager to recommend as an example to other country neighbourhoods. The club had been set on foot[237] to enable the agricultural labourers of the parish to have their beer and pipes independent of the public-house; and the description of it, says Mr. Lawes, "was the occupation of a drive between this place (Rothamsted) and London, 25 miles, Mr. Dickens refusing the offer[245] of a bed, and saying that he could arrange his ideas on the journey. In the course of our conversation I mentioned that the labourers were very jealous of the small tradesmen, blacksmiths and others, holding allotment-gardens; but that the latter did so indirectly by paying higher rents to the labourers for a share. This circumstance is not forgotten in the verses on the Blacksmith in the same number, composed by Mr. Dickens and repeated to me while he was walking about, and which close the mention of his gains with allusion to
The first issue of All the Year Round came out on April 30th, and the results from its initial quarter of sales reveal everything you need to know about a success that continued consistently until the end. "A quick note before I head back to Gadshill," he wrote from Tavistock House in July, "which I know you'll be pleased to hear. All the Year Round has done so well that yesterday it was able to pay me back, with five percent interest, all the money I put in to start it (everything—paper, printing, etc.—has been paid, right down to the last issue), and it still left a solid £500 balance in the bank!" Alongside the opening of his Tale of Two Cities, the first issue also featured another of his pieces, "Poor Man and his Beer;" about which I've received an interesting note. Rev. T. B. Lawes from Rothamsted, St. Alban's, worked on a sanitary commission with Mr. Henry Austin, Dickens's brother-in-law and advisor regarding such issues in his own homes or the homes of the less fortunate; this connection led Dickens to learn about a club that Mr. Lawes had set up at Rothamsted, which he was eager to recommend as an example for other rural areas. The club was created[237] to allow the agricultural laborers in the parish to enjoy their beer and pipes without relying on the local pub; Mr. Lawes says that writing about it occupied him during a 25-mile drive between Rothamsted and London, with Mr. Dickens declining the offer of a bed and stating that he could organize his thoughts on the trip. During our talk, I mentioned that the laborers were quite protective of their allotment gardens against local small businesses, blacksmiths, and others; however, the latter were securing them indirectly by paying higher rents to the laborers for a share. This detail isn’t overlooked in the verses about the Blacksmith in the same issue, written by Mr. Dickens, which he recited to me while he was walking around, and which conclude with a mention of his earnings.
"A share (concealed) in the poor man's field,
"That contributes to the poor man's inventory."
The periodical thus established was in all respects, save one, so exactly the counterpart of what it replaced, that a mention of this point of difference is the only description of it called for. Besides his own three-volume stories of The Tale of Two Cities and Great Expectations, Dickens admitted into it other stories of the same length by writers of character and name, of which the authorship was avowed. It published tales of varied merit and success by Mr. Edmund Yates, Mr. Percy Fitzgerald, and Mr. Charles Lever. Mr. Wilkie Collins contributed to it his Woman in White, No Name, and Moonstone, the first of which had a pre-eminent success; Mr. Reade his Hard Cash; and Lord Lytton his Strange Story. Conferring about the latter Dickens passed a week at Knebworth, accompanied by his daughter and sister-in-law, in the summer of 1861, as soon as he had closed Great Expectations; and there met Mr. Arthur Helps, with whom and Lord[246] Orford he visited the so-called "Hermit" near Stevenage, whom he described as Mr. Mopes in Tom Tiddler's Ground. With his great brother-artist he thoroughly enjoyed himself, as he invariably did; and reported him as "in better health and spirits than I have seen him in, in all these years,—a little weird occasionally regarding magic and spirits, but always fair and frank under opposition. He was brilliantly talkative, anecdotical, and droll; looked young and well; laughed heartily; and enjoyed with great zest some games we played. In his artist-character and talk, he was full of interest and matter, saying the subtlest and finest things—but that he never fails in. I enjoyed myself immensely, as we all did."[238]
The magazine that was established was almost identical to what it replaced, except for one key difference, which is the only thing worth mentioning. Besides his own three-volume stories of The Tale of Two Cities and Great Expectations, Dickens included other stories of similar length written by recognized authors. It featured tales of varying quality and success by Mr. Edmund Yates, Mr. Percy Fitzgerald, and Mr. Charles Lever. Mr. Wilkie Collins contributed Woman in White, No Name, and Moonstone, the first of which was particularly successful; Mr. Reade added his Hard Cash; and Lord Lytton provided his Strange Story. During discussions about the latter, Dickens spent a week at Knebworth with his daughter and sister-in-law in the summer of 1861, right after finishing Great Expectations; there, he met Mr. Arthur Helps, with whom and Lord Orford he visited the so-called "Hermit" near Stevenage, whom he described as Mr. Mopes in Tom Tiddler's Ground. He had a wonderful time with his fellow artist, as he always did, and noted that he was "in better health and spirits than I have seen him in, in all these years—a bit odd at times about magic and spirits, but always fair and open when challenged. He was lively, full of stories and humor; looked young and healthy; laughed heartily; and thoroughly enjoyed some games we played. In his role as an artist and during our conversations, he was engaging and insightful, always saying the most subtle and profound things—something he never fails at. I had an absolute blast, as we all did."[238]
In All the Year Round, as in its predecessor, the tales for Christmas were of course continued, but with a surprisingly increased popularity; and Dickens never had such sale for any of his writings as for his Christmas pieces in the later periodical. It had reached, before he died, to nearly three hundred thousand. The first was called the Haunted House, and had a small[247] mention of a true occurrence in his boyhood which is not included in the bitter record on a former page. "I was taken home, and there was debt at home as well as death, and we had a sale there. My own little bed was so superciliously looked upon by a power unknown to me hazily called The Trade, that a brass coal-scuttle, a roasting jack, and a bird cage were obliged to be put into it to make a lot of it, and then it went for a song. So I heard mentioned, and I wondered what song, and thought what a dismal song it must have been to sing!" The other subjects will have mention in another chapter.
In All the Year Round, just like in the previous edition, the Christmas stories continued, but they gained an unexpectedly higher popularity; Dickens had never sold as many copies of his writings as he did with his Christmas stories in this later publication. By the time he died, the sales had nearly reached three hundred thousand. The first one was called Haunted House, which included a brief[247] reference to a real event from his childhood that isn't included in the harsh account mentioned earlier. "I was taken home, and there was debt at home as well as death, and we had a sale there. My own little bed was so disdainfully regarded by a mysterious force I vaguely called The Trade, that a brass coal scuttle, a roasting jack, and a birdcage had to be put in with it to make it a lot, and then it went for a very low price. So I heard it mentioned, and I wondered what song it was, and thought about how sad that song must have been to sing!" The other topics will be discussed in another chapter.
His tales were not his only important work in All the Year Round. The detached papers written by him there had a character and completeness derived from their plan, and from the personal tone, as well as frequent individual confessions, by which their interest is enhanced, and which will always make them specially attractive. Their title expressed a personal liking. Of all the societies, charitable or self-assisting, which his tact and eloquence in the "chair" so often helped, none had interested him by the character of its service to its members, and the perfection of its management, so much as that of the Commercial Travellers. His, admiration of their schools introduced him to one who then acted as their treasurer, and whom, of all the men he had known, I think he rated highest for the union of business qualities in an incomparable measure to a nature comprehensive enough to deal with masses of men, however differing in creed or opinion, humanely and justly. He never afterwards wanted support for any good work that he did not think first of Mr.[248] George Moore,[239] and appeal was never made to him in vain. "Integrity, enterprise, public spirit, and benevolence," he told the Commercial Travellers on one occasion, "had their synonym in Mr. Moore's name;" and it was another form of the same liking when he took to himself the character and title of a Traveller Uncommercial. "I am both a town traveller and a country traveller, and am always on the road. Figuratively speaking, I travel for the great house of Human-interest Brothers, and have rather a large connection in the fancy goods way. Literally speaking, I am always wandering here and there from my rooms in Covent-garden, London: now about the city streets; now about the country by-roads: seeing many little things, and some great things, which, because they interest me, I think may interest others." In a few words that was the plan and drift of the papers which he began in 1860, and continued to write from time to time until the last autumn of his life.
His stories weren't his only significant work in All the Year Round. The standalone articles he wrote there had a unique character and completeness that came from their structure, as well as a personal tone and frequent individual insights that made them more interesting and always appealing. Their title reflected a personal preference. Among all the charities and self-help groups that his skills and eloquence in the "chair" frequently supported, none had captured his interest as much as the Commercial Travellers, thanks to the quality of service they provided to their members and the excellence of their management. His admiration for their schools led him to meet their treasurer, who, of all the people he knew, he most highly regarded for combining business acumen with a capacity to engage with large groups of people humbly and fairly, regardless of their beliefs or opinions. He never needed support for any good cause without first thinking of Mr.[248] George Moore,[239] and he was never approached in vain. "Integrity, initiative, civic-mindedness, and kindness," he told the Commercial Travellers once, "were synonymous with Mr. Moore's name;" and it was another expression of that same fondness when he took on the persona and title of an Uncommercial Traveller. "I am both an urban and a rural traveller, constantly on the move. Figuratively speaking, I travel for the major company of Human-interest Brothers, and I have quite a significant network in the novelty goods sector. Literally, I am always wandering from my place in Covent Garden, London—sometimes through city streets, sometimes along country roads—observing small and large things that intrigue me, which I believe may also captivate others." In a nutshell, that was the theme and essence of the articles he started writing in 1860, continuing to do so from time to time until the final autumn of his life.
Many of them, such as "Travelling Abroad," "City Churches," "Dullborough," "Nurses' Stories," and[249] "Birthday Celebrations," have supplied traits, chiefly of his younger days, to portions of this memoir; and parts of his later life receive illustration from others, such as "Tramps," "Night Walks," "Shy Neighbourhoods," "The Italian Prisoner," and "Chatham Dockyard." Indeed hardly any is without its personal interest or illustration. One may learn from them, among other things, what kind of treatment he resorted to for the disorder of sleeplessness from which he had often suffered amid his late anxieties. Experimenting upon it in bed, he found to be too slow and doubtful a process for him; but he very soon defeated his enemy by the brisker treatment, of getting up directly after lying down, going out, and coming home tired at sunrise. "My last special feat was turning out of bed at two, after a hard day pedestrian and otherwise, and walking thirty miles into the country to breakfast." One description he did not give in his paper, but I recollect his saying that he had seldom seen anything so striking as the way in which the wonders of an equinoctial dawn (it was the 15th of October 1857) presented themselves during that walk. He had never before happened to see night so completely at odds with morning, "which was which." Another experience of his night ramblings used to be given in vivid sketches of the restlessness of a great city, and the manner in which it also tumbles and tosses before it can get to sleep. Nor should anyone curious about his habits and ways omit to accompany him with his Tramps into Gadshill lanes; or to follow him into his Shy Neighbourhoods of the Hackney-road, Waterloo-road, Spitalfields, or Bethnal-green. For[250] delightful observation both of country and town, for the wit that finds analogies between remote and familiar things, and for humorous personal sketches and experience, these are perfect of their kind.
Many of them, like "Traveling Abroad," "City Churches," "Dullborough," "Nurses' Stories," and[249]"Birthday Celebrations," have shared details, mostly from his younger days, in parts of this memoir; and sections of his later life are illustrated by others, such as "Tramps," "Night Walks," "Shy Neighborhoods," "The Italian Prisoner," and "Chatham Dockyard." In fact, almost none lacks personal interest or illustration. You can learn from them, among other things, what kind of treatment he tried for the insomnia he often suffered from during his later anxieties. Experimenting with it in bed turned out to be too slow and uncertain for him; however, he quickly overcame this challenge with a more active approach: getting up right after lying down, going out, and coming home tired at sunrise. "My last special feat was getting out of bed at two, after a long day of walking and other activities, and walking thirty miles into the countryside for breakfast." He didn't provide one description in his paper, but I remember him saying he had rarely seen anything as striking as the wonders of an equinoctial dawn (it was October 15, 1857) during that walk. He had never seen night and morning so completely at odds, "which was which." Another experience from his night walks was captured in vivid sketches of the restlessness of a great city and how it also tumbles and tosses before it can finally fall asleep. Anyone curious about his habits and lifestyle should definitely join him with his Tramps in Gadshill lanes or follow him into his Shy Neighborhoods around Hackney Road, Waterloo Road, Spitalfields, or Bethnal Green. For[250]delightful observations of both countryside and city, for the wit that finds similarities between distant and familiar things, and for humorous personal sketches and experiences, these are perfect in their own way.
"I have my eye upon a piece of Kentish road, bordered on either side by a wood, and having on one hand, between the road-dust and the trees, a skirting patch of grass. Wild flowers grow in abundance on this spot, and it lies high and airy, with a distant river stealing steadily away to the ocean, like a man's life. To gain the mile-stone here, which the moss, primroses, violets, blue-bells, and wild roses, would soon render illegible but for peering travellers pushing them aside with their sticks, you must come up a steep hill, come which way you may. So, all the tramps with carts or caravans—the Gipsy-tramp, the Show-tramp, the Cheap Jack—find it impossible to resist the temptations of the place; and all turn the horse loose when they come to it, and boil the pot. Bless the place, I love the ashes of the vagabond fires that have scorched its grass!" It was there he found Dr. Marigold, and Chops the Dwarf, and the White-haired Lady with the pink eyes eating meat-pie with the Giant. So, too, in his Shy Neighbourhoods, when he relates his experiences of the bad company that birds are fond of, and of the effect upon domestic fowls of living in low districts, his method of handling the subject has all the charm of a discovery. "That anything born of an egg and invested with wings should have got to the pass that it hops contentedly down a ladder into a cellar, and calls that going home, is a circumstance so amazing as to leave one nothing more in this connexion[251] to wonder at." One of his illustrations is a reduced Bantam family in the Hackney-road deriving their sole enjoyment from crowding together in a pawnbroker's side-entry; but seeming as if only newly come down in the world, and always in a feeble flutter of fear that they may be found out. He contrasts them with others. "I know a low fellow, originally of a good family from Dorking, who takes his whole establishment of wives, in single file, in at the door of the Jug Department of a disorderly tavern near the Haymarket, manœuvres them among the company's legs, emerges with them at the Bottle Entrance, and so passes his life: seldom, in the season, going to bed before two in the morning. . . . But, the family I am best acquainted with, reside in the densest part of Bethnal-green. Their abstraction from the objects among which they live, or rather their conviction that those objects have all come into existence in express subservience to fowls, has so enchanted me, that I have made them the subject of many journeys at divers hours. After careful observation of the two lords and the ten ladies of whom this family consists, I have come to the conclusion that their opinions are represented by the leading lord and leading lady: the latter, as I judge, an aged personage, afflicted with a paucity of feather and visibility of quill that gives her the appearance of a bundle of office pens. When a railway goods-van that would crush an elephant comes round the corner, tearing over these fowls, they emerge unharmed from under the horses, perfectly satisfied that the whole rush was a passing property in the air, which may have left something to eat behind it. They[252] look upon old shoes, wrecks of kettles and saucepans, and fragments of bonnets, as a kind of meteoric discharge, for fowls to peck at. . . . Gaslight comes quite as natural to them as any other light; and I have more than a suspicion that, in the minds of the two lords, the early public-house at the corner has superseded the sun. They always begin to crow when the public-house shutters begin to be taken down, and they salute the Potboy, the instant he appears to perform that duty, as if he were Phœbes in person." For the truth of the personal adventure in the same essay, which he tells in proof of a propensity to bad company in more refined members of the feathered race, I am myself in a position to vouch. Walking by a dirty court in Spitalfields one day, the quick little busy intelligence of a goldfinch, drawing water for himself in his cage, so attracted him that he bought the bird, which had other accomplishments; but not one of them would the little creature show off in his new abode in Doughty-street, and he drew no water but by stealth or under the cloak of night. "After an interval of futile and at length hopeless expectation, the merchant who had educated him was appealed to. The merchant was a bow-legged character, with a flat and cushiony nose, like the last new strawberry. He wore a fur cap, and shorts, and was of the velveteen race, velveteeny. He sent word that he would 'look round.' He looked round, appeared in the doorway of the room, and slightly cocked up his evil eye at the goldfinch. Instantly a raging thirst beset that bird; and when it was appeased, he still drew several unnecessary buckets of water, leaping about his perch and sharpening his bill with irrepressible satisfaction."[253]
"I have my eye on a stretch of road in Kent, lined on both sides by woods, and with a patch of grass between the dirt of the road and the trees. Wildflowers grow abundantly here, and it sits up high, airy, with a distant river lazily winding its way to the ocean, much like a person's life. To reach the mile-stone, which the moss, primroses, violets, bluebells, and wild roses would soon cover to the point of being unreadable if not for curious travelers pushing them aside with their sticks, you have to come up a steep hill, regardless of the direction you're coming from. So, all the travelers with carts or caravans—the Gypsy-tramp, the Show-tramp, the Cheap Jack—find it impossible to resist the allure of the place; they all set their horses loose when they arrive, and cook a meal. I adore the remnants of the wandering fires that have scorched this grass!" It was here he found Dr. Marigold, Chops the Dwarf, and the White-haired Lady with the pink eyes enjoying meat pie with the Giant. Similarly, in his Shy Neighborhoods, when he shares his experiences with the bad company that birds keep, and the impact on domestic fowl living in lower areas, he handles the topic with all the charm of a discovery. "That anything born of an egg and given wings should reach the point of hopping contentedly down a ladder into a cellar and calling it home is so astonishing that it leaves one with nothing more to wonder about in this regard[251]." One of his examples is a small Bantam family in Hackney Road finding their only enjoyment from huddling together in a pawnbroker's side entrance; they seem like they’ve just fallen on hard times, always nervously flapping about in fear of being discovered. He contrasts them with others. "I know a lowly guy, originally from a good family in Dorking, who takes all his wives, single file, through the door of the Jug Department of a rowdy tavern near the Haymarket, maneuvers them around the patrons' legs, and exits at the Bottle Entrance, living like this: rarely going to bed before two in the morning. . . . But the family I know best lives in the thickest part of Bethnal Green. Their disconnect from their surroundings, or rather their belief that those surroundings exist solely for the benefit of chickens, has so fascinated me that I have made them the subject of many visits at different times. After careful observation of the two roosters and the ten hens in this family, I’ve concluded that their opinions are represented by the primary rooster and hen: the latter, as I gather, is an older creature, lacking feathers and with prominent quills that make her look like a bundle of office pens. When a freight train that could crush an elephant rolls around the corner, barreling over these fowls, they emerge unscathed from under the horses, completely convinced that the whole commotion was just something passing through the air, possibly leaving food behind. They[252] view old shoes, discarded kettles and pots, and bits of bonnets like some sort of meteor shower, just for the chickens to peck at. . . . Gaslight seems as natural to them as any other kind of light; and I suspect that, in the minds of the two roosters, the local pub at the corner has taken the place of the sun. They start to crow when the pub shutters come down, greeting the Potboy the moment he appears to open them, as if he were the sun itself." As for the truth of the personal story in the same essay, which he uses to illustrate a tendency for bad company among more refined members of the bird kingdom, I can personally vouch for it. One day, while walking past a dirty courtyard in Spitalfields, the quick, busy intelligence of a goldfinch drawing water for himself in his cage caught his attention so much that he bought the bird, which had other tricks; but none of those tricks would the little creature show off in his new home on Doughty Street, only drawing water in secret or under the cover of night. "After a period of fruitless and eventually hopeless waiting, he appealed to the merchant who had trained him. The merchant was a bow-legged man with a flat, soft nose like the last ripe strawberry. He wore a fur hat, shorts, and was of the velveteen type, velveteeny. He sent word that he would 'look around.' He looked around, appeared in the doorway of the room, and slightly raised his nasty eye at the goldfinch. Instantly, an intense thirst overwhelmed that bird; and after quenching it, he still drew several unnecessary buckets of water, hopping around his perch and sharpening his beak with uncontainable satisfaction."[253]
The Uncommercial Traveller papers, his two serial stories, and his Christmas tales, were all the contributions of any importance made by Dickens to All the Year Round; but he reprinted in it, on the completion of his first story, a short tale called "Hunted Down," written for a newspaper in America called the New York Ledger. Its subject had been taken from the life of a notorious criminal already named, and its principal claim to notice was the price paid for it. For a story not longer than half of one of the numbers of Chuzzlewit or Copperfield, he had received a thousand pounds.[240] It was one of the indications of the eager desire which his entry on the career of a public reader had aroused in America to induce him again to visit that continent; and at the very time he had this magnificent offer from the New York journal, Mr. Fields of Boston, who was then on a visit to Europe, was pressing him so much to go that his resolution was almost shaken. "I am now," he wrote to me from Gadshill on the 9th of July 1859, "getting the Tale of Two Cities into that state that IF I should decide to go to America late in September, I could turn to, at any time, and write on with great vigour. Mr. Fields has been down here for a day, and with the strongest intensity urges that there is no drawback, no commercial excitement or crisis, no political agitation; and that so favourable an opportunity, in all respects, might not occur again for years and years. I should be one of[254] the most unhappy of men if I were to go, and yet I cannot help being much stirred and influenced by the golden prospect held before me."
The Uncommercial Traveller papers, his two serial stories, and his Christmas tales were the only significant contributions Dickens made to All the Year Round; however, after finishing his first story, he reprinted a short tale called "Hunted Down," which he had written for an American newspaper called the New York Ledger. The story was based on the life of a well-known criminal previously mentioned, and its main point of interest was the hefty payment he received for it. For a story no longer than half of one of the issues of Chuzzlewit or Copperfield, he earned a thousand pounds.[240] This was a clear sign of the strong desire his new career as a public reader had sparked in America for him to visit that continent again; at the same time he received this amazing offer from the New York journal, Mr. Fields from Boston, who was visiting Europe, was urging him to go so intensely that his resolve was nearly shaken. "I am now," he wrote to me from Gadshill on July 9, 1859, "finishing the Tale of Two Cities to the point that IF I decide to go to America in late September, I could start writing with a lot of energy at any moment. Mr. Fields was here for a day and strongly insists that there’s no downside, no commercial excitement or crisis, no political unrest; and that such a favorable opportunity in every way might not happen again for many years. I would be one of[254] the most miserable men if I went, but I can't help being really excited and influenced by the brilliant prospect in front of me."
He yielded nevertheless to other persuasion, and for that time the visit was not to be. In six months more the Civil War began, and America was closed to any such enterprise for nearly five years.
He gave in to other persuasion, and that time the visit didn’t happen. Six months later, the Civil War began, and America was shut off from any such venture for nearly five years.
CHAPTER XI.
SECOND SERIES OF READINGS.
1861-1863.
At the end of the first year of residence at Gadshill it was the remark of Dickens that nothing had gratified him so much as the confidence with which his poorer neighbours treated him. He had tested generally their worth and good conduct, and they had been encouraged in illness or trouble to resort to him for help. There was pleasant indication of the feeling thus awakened, when, in the summer of 1860, his younger daughter Kate was married to Charles Alston Collins, brother of the novelist, and younger son of the painter and academician, who might have found, if spared to witness that summer-morning scene, subjects not unworthy of his delightful pencil in many a rustic group[256] near Gadshill. All the villagers had turned out in honour of Dickens, and the carriages could hardly get to and from the little church for the succession of triumphal arches they had to pass through. It was quite unexpected by him; and when the feu de joie of the blacksmith in the lane, whose enthusiasm had smuggled a couple of small cannon into his forge, exploded upon him at the return, I doubt if the shyest of men was ever so taken aback at an ovation.
At the end of his first year living at Gadshill, Dickens remarked that nothing pleased him more than the trust his less fortunate neighbors showed him. He had generally assessed their character and good behavior, and they felt comfortable turning to him for help during tough times or illness. This feeling was nicely reflected when, in the summer of 1860, his younger daughter Kate married Charles Alston Collins, the novelist's brother and the younger son of the painter and academician. If he had been there to witness that summer morning, he might have found worthy subjects for his delightful art in the various rustic groups near Gadshill. All the villagers came out to honor Dickens, and the carriages could barely navigate to and from the small church because of the series of triumphal arches they had to go through. It was completely unexpected for him; and when the celebratory firing from the enthusiastic blacksmith in the lane, who had secretly brought a couple of small cannons into his forge, erupted upon his return, I doubt any shy person has ever been as surprised by an ovation.
To name the principal persons present that day will indicate the faces that (with addition of Miss Mary Boyle, Miss Marguerite Power, Mr. Fechter, Mr. Charles Kent, Mr. Edmund Yates, Mr. Percy Fitzgerald, and members of the family of Mr. Frank Stone, whose sudden death[241] in the preceding year had been a great grief to Dickens) were most familiar at Gadshill in these later years. Mr. Frederic Lehmann was there with his wife, whose sister, Miss Chambers, was one of the bridesmaids; Mr. and Mrs. Wills were there, and Dickens's old fast friend Mr. Thomas Beard; the two nearest country neighbours with whom the family had become very intimate, Mr. Hulkes and Mr. Malleson, with their wives, joined the party; among the others were Henry Chorley, Chauncy Townshend, and Wilkie[257] Collins; and, for friend special to the occasion, the bridegroom had brought his old fellow-student in art, Mr. Holman Hunt. Mr. Charles Collins had himself been bred as a painter, for success in which line he had some rare gifts; but inclination and capacity led him also to literature, and, after much indecision between the two callings, he took finally to letters. His contributions to All the Year Round were among the most charming of its detached papers, and two stories published independently showed strength of wing for higher flights. But his health broke down, and his taste was too fastidious for his failing power. It is possible however that he may live by two small books of description, the New Sentimental Journey and the Cruize on Wheels, which have in them unusual delicacy and refinement of humour; and if those volumes should make any readers in another generation curious about the writer, they will learn, if correct reply is given to their inquiries, that no man disappointed so many reasonable hopes with so little fault or failure of his own, that his difficulty always was to please himself, and that an inferior mind would have been more successful in both the arts he followed. He died in 1873 in his forty-fifth year; and until then it was not known, even by those nearest to him, how great must have been the suffering which he had borne, through many trying years, with uncomplaining patience.
To list the main people present that day includes the faces that (along with Miss Mary Boyle, Miss Marguerite Power, Mr. Fechter, Mr. Charles Kent, Mr. Edmund Yates, Mr. Percy Fitzgerald, and members of Mr. Frank Stone's family, whose sudden death[241] the previous year had deeply saddened Dickens) were most familiar at Gadshill in those later years. Mr. Frederic Lehmann was there with his wife, whose sister, Miss Chambers, was one of the bridesmaids; Mr. and Mrs. Wills were also present, along with Dickens's longtime friend Mr. Thomas Beard. The two closest country neighbors, with whom the family had grown very close, Mr. Hulkes and Mr. Malleson, along with their wives, joined the gathering. Among others were Henry Chorley, Chauncy Townshend, and Wilkie[257] Collins; and for a special friend of the occasion, the groom had brought his old art school friend, Mr. Holman Hunt. Mr. Charles Collins had been trained as a painter, a field in which he had some rare talent, but his interests led him to literature as well, and after much indecision between the two paths, he ultimately chose to pursue writing. His contributions to All the Year Round were among the most delightful of its individual pieces, and two stories published separately demonstrated his potential for greater achievements. However, his health deteriorated, and his taste was too refined for his diminishing abilities. It’s possible, though, that he may be remembered through two small descriptive books, the New Sentimental Journey and the Cruize on Wheels, which showcase unusual delicacy and humor. If those volumes spark curiosity in readers from another generation, they will discover, through accurate responses to their inquiries, that no one disappointed so many reasonable hopes with so little fault or failure of their own; his main challenge was satisfying himself, and a less sophisticated mind might have succeeded in both creative fields he pursued. He passed away in 1873 at the age of forty-five, and until then, it was not known, even by those closest to him, how much suffering he had endured through many challenging years with quiet patience.
His daughter's marriage was the chief event that had crossed the even tenor of Dickens's life since his first paid readings closed; and it was followed by the sale of Tavistock House, with the resolve to make his future home at Gadshill. In the brief interval (29th[258] of July) he wrote to me of his brother Alfred's death. "I was telegraphed for to Manchester on Friday night. Arrived there at a quarter past ten, but he had been dead three hours, poor fellow! He is to be buried at Highgate on Wednesday. I brought the poor young widow back with me yesterday." All that this death involved,[242] the troubles of his change of home, and some difficulties in working out his story, gave him more than sufficient occupation till the following spring; and as the time arrived for the new Readings, the change was a not unwelcome one.
His daughter's wedding was the main event that had disrupted the steady routine of Dickens's life since his first paid readings ended; this was soon followed by the sale of Tavistock House and his decision to make Gadshill his future home. During the short break (July 29th) he wrote to me about his brother Alfred's passing. "I was called to Manchester on Friday night. I got there at a quarter past ten, but he had already been dead for three hours, poor guy! He’s being buried at Highgate on Wednesday. I brought the poor young widow back with me yesterday." All that this death entailed, along with the challenges of his relocation and some obstacles in finishing his story, kept him more than busy until the next spring; and as the time approached for the new Readings, this change was not an unwelcome one.
The first portion of this second series was planned by Mr. Arthur Smith, but he only superintended the six readings in London which opened it. These were the first at St. James's Hall (St. Martin's Hall having been burnt since the last readings there) and were given in March and April 1861. "We are all well here and flourishing," he wrote to me from Gadshill on the 28th of April. "On the 18th I finished the readings as I purposed. We had between seventy and eighty pounds in the stalls, which, at four shillings[259] apiece, is something quite unprecedented in these times. . . . The result of the six was, that, after paying a large staff of men and all other charges, and Arthur Smith's ten per cent. on the receipts, and replacing everything destroyed in the fire at St. Martin's Hall (including all our tickets, country-baggage, cheque-boxes, books, and a quantity of gas-fittings and what not), I got upwards of £500. A very great result. We certainly might have gone on through the season, but I am heartily glad to be concentrated on my story."
The first part of this second series was organized by Mr. Arthur Smith, but he only supervised the six readings in London that kicked it off. These were held at St. James's Hall (St. Martin's Hall had burned down since the last readings there) and took place in March and April 1861. "We’re all doing well and thriving," he wrote to me from Gadshill on April 28th. "On the 18th, I finished the readings as I planned. We had between seventy and eighty pounds in the stalls, which, at four shillings[259] each, is something quite unprecedented these days. The outcome of the six was that, after paying a large team of staff and all other expenses, as well as Arthur Smith's ten percent cut from the receipts, and replacing everything lost in the fire at St. Martin's Hall (including all our tickets, country baggage, cheque boxes, books, and a bunch of gas fittings and other items), I cleared over £500. A very significant result. We certainly could have continued through the season, but I’m really happy to focus on my story."
It had been part of his plan that the Provincial Readings should not begin until a certain interval after the close of his story of Great Expectations. They were delayed accordingly until the 28th of October, from which date, when they opened at Norwich, they went on with the Christmas intervals to be presently named to the 30th of January 1862, when they closed at Chester. Kept within England and Scotland, they took in the border town of Berwick, and, besides the Scotch cities, comprised the contrasts and varieties of Norwich and Lancaster, Bury St. Edmunds and Cheltenham, Carlisle and Hastings, Plymouth and Birmingham, Canterbury and Torquay, Preston and Ipswich, Manchester and Brighton, Colchester and Dover, Newcastle and Chester. They were followed by ten readings at the St. James's Hall, between the 13th of March and the 27th of June 1862; and by four at Paris in January 1863, given at the Embassy in aid of the British Charitable Fund. The second series had thus in the number of the readings nearly equalled the first, when it closed at London in June 1863 with[260] thirteen readings in the Hanover Square Rooms; and it is exclusively the subject of such illustrations or references as this chapter will supply.
It was part of his plan that the Provincial Readings wouldn't start until a certain time after finishing his story of Great Expectations. They were pushed back accordingly to October 28th, and from that date, when they started in Norwich, they continued with Christmas breaks until January 30, 1862, when they wrapped up in Chester. Sticking to England and Scotland, they included the border town of Berwick and the Scottish cities, featuring the contrasts and varieties of Norwich, Lancaster, Bury St. Edmunds, Cheltenham, Carlisle, Hastings, Plymouth, Birmingham, Canterbury, Torquay, Preston, Ipswich, Manchester, Brighton, Colchester, Dover, Newcastle, and Chester. This was followed by ten readings at St. James's Hall, between March 13 and June 27, 1862, and four in Paris in January 1863, held at the Embassy to support the British Charitable Fund. The second series of readings nearly matched the first when it finished in London in June 1863 with[260] thirteen readings in the Hanover Square Rooms, and this chapter will focus exclusively on those illustrations and references.
On Great Expectations closing in June 1861, Bulwer Lytton, at Dickens's earnest wish, took his place in All the Year Round with the "Strange Story;" and he then indulged himself in idleness for a little while. "The subsidence of those distressing pains in my face the moment I had done my work, made me resolve to do nothing in that way for some time if I could help it."[243] But his "doing nothing" was seldom more than a figure of speech, and what it meant in this case was soon told. "Every day for two or three hours, I practise my new readings, and (except in my office work) do nothing else. With great pains I have made a continuous narrative out of Copperfield, that I think will reward the exertion it is likely to cost me. Unless I am much mistaken, it will be very valuable in London. I have also done Nicholas Nickleby at the Yorkshire school, and hope I have got something droll out of Squeers, John Browdie, & Co. Also, the Bastille prisoner from the Tale of Two Cities. Also, the Dwarf from one of our Christmas numbers." Only the first two were added to the list for the present circuit.
On Great Expectations wrapping up in June 1861, Bulwer Lytton, at Dickens's strong request, took his spot in All the Year Round with the "Strange Story;" and he then allowed himself a little time to relax. "The relief from those painful moments in my face the instant I finished my work made me decide to avoid doing anything like that for a while if I could manage it."[243] But his "doing nothing" was rarely more than just a saying, and what it meant in this case became clear quickly. "Every day for two or three hours, I practice my new readings, and (aside from my office work) do nothing else. With great effort, I have created a continuous narrative from Copperfield, which I think will be worth the effort it’s likely to take. Unless I’m very wrong, it will be quite valuable in London. I’ve also worked on Nicholas Nickleby at the Yorkshire school and hope I’ve pulled something funny from Squeers, John Browdie, & Co. Plus, I’ve included the Bastille prisoner from A Tale of Two Cities. Also, the Dwarf from one of our Christmas editions." Only the first two were added to the list for the current circuit.
It was in the midst of these active preparations that painful news reached him. An illness under which Mr. Arthur Smith had been some time suffering took[261] unexpectedly a dangerous turn, and there came to be but small chance of his recovery. A distressing interview on the 28th of September gave Dickens little hope. "And yet his wakings and wanderings so perpetually turn on his arrangements for the Readings, and he is so desperately unwilling to relinquish the idea of 'going on with the business' to-morrow and to-morrow and to-morrow, that I had not the heart to press him for the papers. He told me that he believed he had by him '70 or 80 letters unanswered.' You may imagine how anxious it makes me, and at what a deadstop I stand." Another week passed, and with it the time fixed at the places where his work was to have opened; but he could not bring himself to act as if all hope had gone. "With a sick man who has been so zealous and faithful, I feel bound to be very tender and patient. When I told him the other day about my having engaged Headland—'to do all the personally bustling and fatiguing part of your work,' I said—he nodded his heavy head with great satisfaction, and faintly got out of himself the words, 'Of course I pay him, and not you.'" The poor fellow died in October; and on the day after attending the funeral,[262][244] Dickens heard of the death of his brother-in-law and friend, Mr. Henry Austin, whose abilities and character he respected as much as he liked the man. He lost much in losing the judicious and safe counsel which had guided him on many public questions in which he took lively interest, and it was with a heavy heart he set out at last upon his second circuit. "With what difficulty I get myself back to the readings after all this loss and trouble, or with what unwillingness I work myself up to the mark of looking them in the face, I can hardly say. As for poor Arthur Smith at this time, it is as if my right arm were gone. It is only just now that I am able to open one of the books, and screw the text out of myself in a flat dull way. Enclosed is the list of what I have to do. You will see that I have left ten days in November for the Christmas number, and also a good Christmas margin for our meeting at Gadshill. I shall be very glad to have the money that I expect to get; but it will be earned." That November interval was also the date of the marriage of his eldest son to the daughter of Mr. Evans, so long, in connection with Mr. Bradbury, his publisher and printer.
It was during these busy preparations that some painful news reached him. Mr. Arthur Smith had been ill for some time, and his condition took an unexpectedly dangerous turn, leaving very little chance for his recovery. A distressing meeting on September 28th gave Dickens little hope. "Yet his moments of waking and wandering are so often focused on his plans for the Readings, and he is so desperately unwilling to give up the idea of 'going on with the business' tomorrow and tomorrow and tomorrow, that I couldn't bring myself to press him for the papers. He told me he believed he had '70 or 80 unanswered letters' lying around. You can imagine how anxious I am and how at a standstill I feel." Another week went by, along with the dates set for his performances, but he couldn't bring himself to act as if all hope was gone. "With a sick man who has been so dedicated and loyal, I feel obligated to be very gentle and patient. When I told him recently that I had hired Headland—'to take care of all the personally demanding and exhausting parts of your work,' I said—he nodded his heavy head with great satisfaction and weakly managed to say, 'Of course, I pay him, not you.'" The poor man passed away in October; and the day after attending the funeral,[262][244] Dickens learned of the death of his brother-in-law and friend, Mr. Henry Austin, whose skills and character he respected as much as he liked him. He lost a lot in losing the wise and reliable advice that had guided him on many public issues in which he was deeply interested, and it was with a heavy heart that he finally set out on his second tour. "I can hardly express how difficult it is for me to return to the readings after all this loss and trouble, or how reluctant I am to motivate myself to face them. As for poor Arthur Smith at this time, it's like my right arm is gone. It's only just now that I'm able to open one of the books and push the text out in a flat, dull way. Enclosed is the list of what I need to do. You'll see that I've left ten days in November for the Christmas issue, and also a good amount of time for our gathering at Gadshill. I'll be very glad to receive the money I expect to earn; but it will certainly be earned." That November was also the time of his eldest son's marriage to the daughter of Mr. Evans, who had long been connected with Mr. Bradbury, his publisher and printer.
The start of the readings at Norwich was not good, so many changes of vexation having been incident to the opening announcements as to leave some doubt of their fulfilment. But the second night, when trial was made of the Nickleby scenes, "we had a splendid hall, and I think Nickleby will top all the readings. Somehow[263] it seems to have got in it, by accident, exactly the qualities best suited to the purpose; and it went last night, not only with roars, but with a general hilarity and pleasure that I have never seen surpassed."[245] From this night onward, the success was uninterrupted, and here was his report to me from Brighton on the 8th of November. "We turned away half Dover and half Hastings and half Colchester; and, if you can believe such a thing, I may tell you that in round numbers we find 1000 stalls already taken here in Brighton! I left Colchester in a heavy snow-storm. To-day it is so warm here that I can hardly bear the fire, and am writing with the window open down to the ground. Last night I had a most charming audience for Copperfield, with a delicacy of perception that really made the work delightful. It is very pretty to see the girls and women generally, in the matter of Dora; and everywhere I have found that peculiar personal relation between my audience and myself on which I counted most when I entered on this enterprise. Nickleby continues to go in the wildest manner."
The readings in Norwich started off poorly, with so many frustrating changes during the opening announcements that it left some uncertainty about their success. However, on the second night, when they tested the Nickleby scenes, "we had a fantastic turnout, and I think Nickleby will be the highlight of all the readings. Somehow[263] it accidentally captured exactly the qualities that are perfect for this purpose; it received not only loud applause but also an overall excitement and enjoyment that I've never seen matched." From that night on, the success was consistent, and here’s his report to me from Brighton on November 8th. "We turned away half of Dover and half of Hastings and half of Colchester; and, believe it or not, there are about 1000 tickets already sold here in Brighton! I left Colchester during a heavy snowstorm. Today, it’s so warm here that I can barely stand the heat of the fire, and I’m writing with the window wide open. Last night, I had a wonderful audience for Copperfield, with such a refined understanding that made the experience enjoyable. It’s lovely to see the girls and women, especially regarding Dora; and everywhere I’ve noticed that special personal connection between my audience and me that I was hoping for when I started this venture. Nickleby continues to be a huge hit."
A storm was at this time sweeping round the coast, and while at Dover he had written of it to his sister-in-law (7th of November): "The bad weather has not in the least touched us, and the storm was most magnificent[264] at Dover. All the great side of the Lord Warden next the sea had to be emptied, the break of the waves was so prodigious, and the noise so utterly confounding. The sea came in like a great sky of immense clouds, for ever breaking suddenly into furious rain; all kinds of wreck were washed in; among other things, a very pretty brass-bound chest being thrown about like a feather. . . . The unhappy Ostend packet, unable to get in or go back, beat about the Channel all Tuesday night, and until noon yesterday; when I saw her come in, with five men at the wheel, a picture of misery inconceivable. . . . The effect of the readings at Hastings and Dover really seems to have outdone the best usual impression; and at Dover they wouldn't go, but sat applauding like mad. The most delicate audience I have seen in any provincial place, is Canterbury" ("an intelligent and delightful response in them," he wrote to his daughter, "like the touch of a beautiful instrument"); "but the audience with the greatest sense of humour certainly is Dover. The people in the stalls set the example of laughing, in the most curiously unreserved way; and they laughed with such really cordial enjoyment, when Squeers read the boys' letters, that the contagion extended to me. For, one couldn't hear them without laughing too. . . . So, I am thankful to say, all goes well, and the recompense for the trouble is in every way Great."
A storm was currently sweeping along the coast, and while he was in Dover, he had written to his sister-in-law (7th of November): "The bad weather hasn’t affected us at all, and the storm was absolutely incredible at Dover. The whole side of the Lord Warden facing the sea had to be cleared out because the waves were so huge, and the noise was utterly bewildering. The sea rolled in like a massive sky filled with dark clouds, constantly bursting into violent rain; all sorts of wreckage were washed ashore; among other things, a really nice brass-bound chest was tossed around like a feather. . . . The unfortunate Ostend packet, unable to get in or go back, struggled in the Channel all Tuesday night and until noon yesterday; when I finally saw her come in with five men at the wheel, looking utterly miserable. . . . The response to the readings at Hastings and Dover really seems to have surpassed the usual best impression; at Dover, the audience wouldn’t leave but kept applauding like crazy. The most appreciative audience I’ve seen in any provincial town is in Canterbury" ("an intelligent and delightful response from them," he wrote to his daughter, "like the touch of a beautiful instrument"); "but the audience with the best sense of humor is definitely in Dover. The people in the stalls led the way in laughing, in the most unexpectedly free manner; and they laughed with such genuine enjoyment when Squeers read the boys' letters that I couldn’t help but join in. One couldn’t hear them without laughing too. . . . So, I’m happy to say that everything is going well, and the rewards for the effort are truly great."
From the opposite quarter of Berwick-on-Tweed he wrote again in the midst of storm. But first his mention of Newcastle, which he had also taken on his way to Edinburgh, reading two nights there, should be given. "At Newcastle, against the very heavy expenses,[265] I made more than a hundred guineas profit. A finer audience there is not in England, and I suppose them to be a specially earnest people; for, while they can laugh till they shake the roof, they have a very unusual sympathy with what is pathetic or passionate. An extraordinary thing occurred on the second night. The room was tremendously crowded and my gas-apparatus fell down. There was a terrible wave among the people for an instant, and God knows what destruction of life a rush to the stairs would have caused. Fortunately a lady in the front of the stalls ran out towards me, exactly in a place where I knew that the whole hall could see her. So I addressed her, laughing, and half-asked and half-ordered her to sit down again; and, in a moment, it was all over. But the men in attendance had such a fearful sense of what might have happened (besides the real danger of Fire) that they positively shook the boards I stood on, with their trembling, when they came up to put things right. I am proud to record that the gas-man's sentiment, as delivered afterwards, was, 'The more you want of the master, the more you'll find in him.' With which complimentary homage, and with the wind blowing so that I can hardly hear myself write, I conclude."[246]
From the other side of Berwick-on-Tweed, he wrote again in the middle of a storm. But first, I should mention his experience in Newcastle, which he also visited on his way to Edinburgh, spending two nights there. "In Newcastle, despite very high costs,[265] I made over a hundred guineas in profit. There's no better audience in England, and I think they are particularly passionate people; they can laugh so hard that it shakes the roof, but they also have an uncommon empathy for what is moving or intense. Something extraordinary happened on the second night. The room was packed, and my gas setup collapsed. For a moment, there was panic among the crowd, and it’s hard to imagine what could have happened if everyone rushed for the exits. Fortunately, a woman in the front row ran toward me, right in the line of sight for the whole room. I addressed her, jokingly telling her to sit back down, and in an instant, the tension eased. But the staff were clearly shaken by the potential disaster (not to mention the real threat of a fire) and were visibly trembling as they came up to fix the problem. I’m proud to note that the gas guy remarked afterward, 'The more you expect from the master, the more you’ll get from him.' With that compliment, and with the wind howling so loudly I can barely hear myself write, I’ll wrap this up."
It was still blowing, in shape of a gale from the sea, when, an hour before the reading, he wrote from the King's Arms at Berwick-on-Tweed. "As odd and out of the way a place to be at, it appears to me, as ever was seen! And such a ridiculous room designed for me to read in! An immense Corn Exchange, made of glass and iron, round, dome-topp'd, lofty, utterly absurd for any such purpose, and full of thundering echoes; with a little lofty crow's nest of a stone gallery, breast high, deep in the wall, into which it was designed to put——me! I instantly struck, of course; and said I would either read in a room attached to this house (a very snug one, capable of holding 500 people), or not at all. Terrified local agents glowered, but fell prostrate, and my men took the primitive accommodation in hand. Ever since, I am alarmed to add, the people (who besought the honour of the visit) have been coming in numbers quite irreconcileable with the appearance of the place, and what is to be the end I do not know. It was poor Arthur Smith's principle that a town on the way paid the expenses of a long through-journey,[267] and therefore I came." The Reading paid more than those expenses.
It was still blowing hard, like a gale from the sea, when, an hour before the reading, he wrote from the King's Arms at Berwick-on-Tweed. "What a strange and remote place this is! And this ridiculous room they've set up for me to read in! An enormous Corn Exchange, made of glass and iron, round, dome-topped, and way too high—completely absurd for any such event, and it echoes like crazy; with a little high stone gallery that sticks out from the wall, just about chest-high, where they intended to put——me! I immediately insisted that I would either read in a room attached to this establishment (a really cozy one that could hold 500 people), or not at all. The terrified local agents glared but eventually gave in, and my team took control of the basic setup. Since then, I’m alarmed to say, the locals (who were eager for the visit) have been coming in numbers that are totally inconsistent with the size of the place, and I don't know how this will end. It was poor Arthur Smith's principle that a town on the way covered the costs of a long journey,[267] and that’s why I came." The Reading covered more than those costs.
Enthusiastic greeting awaited him in Edinburgh. "We had in the hall exactly double what we had on the first night last time. The success of Copperfield was perfectly unexampled. Four great rounds of applause with a burst of cheering at the end, and every point taken in the finest manner." But this was nothing to what befell on the second night, when, by some mistake of the local agents, the tickets issued were out of proportion to the space available. Writing from Glasgow next day (3rd of December) he described the scene. "Such a pouring of hundreds into a place already full to the throat, such indescribable confusion, such a rending and tearing of dresses, and yet such a scene of good humour on the whole, I never saw the faintest approach to. While I addressed the crowd in the room, G addressed the crowd in the street. Fifty frantic men got up in all parts of the hall and addressed me all at once. Other frantic men made speeches to the walls. The whole B family were borne in on the top of a wave, and landed with their faces against the front of the platform. I read with the platform crammed with people. I got them to lie down upon it, and it was like some impossible tableau or gigantic pic-nic—one pretty girl in full dress, lying on her side all night, holding on to one of the legs of my table! It was the most extraordinary sight. And yet, from the moment I began to the moment of my leaving off, they never missed a point, and they ended with a burst of cheers. . . . The expenditure of lungs and spirits was (as you may suppose) rather great; and to sleep well was out[268] of the question. I am therefore rather fagged to-day; and as the hall in which I read to-night is a large one, I must make my letter a short one. . . . My people were torn to ribbons last night. They have not a hat among them—and scarcely a coat." He came home for his Christmas rest by way of Manchester, and thus spoke of the reading there on the 14th of December. "Copperfield in the Free Trade Hall last Saturday was really a grand scene."
An enthusiastic welcome awaited him in Edinburgh. "We had exactly double the audience in the hall compared to the first night last time. The success of Copperfield was truly unprecedented. Four big rounds of applause followed by cheering at the end, and every moment was received brilliantly." But this was nothing compared to what happened on the second night when, due to a mistake by the local agents, the tickets sold were way more than the available space. Writing from Glasgow the next day (December 3rd), he described the chaos. "There was an overwhelming flood of hundreds into a place already packed to the brim, such indescribable confusion, such ripping and tearing of dresses, and yet an overall sense of good humor that I had never witnessed before. While I addressed the crowd in the hall, G spoke to the crowd outside. Fifty frantic men stood up all over the hall and shouted at me all at once. Other frantic men gave speeches to the walls. The whole B family was swept in on a wave and landed with their faces against the front of the stage. I read with the platform crammed with people. I got them to lie down on it, and it looked like some impossible tableau or gigantic picnic—one pretty girl in formal dress, lying on her side all night, holding on to one of the legs of my table! It was the most extraordinary sight. Yet, from the moment I started to the moment I finished, they never missed a point, and they ended with a loud cheer. The effort of shouting and the excitement were (as you can imagine) pretty intense; so sleeping well was out of the question. I’m feeling quite worn out today, and since the hall where I’m reading tonight is a large one, I have to keep this letter brief. My people were torn to shreds last night. They don’t have a hat among them—and hardly any coats." He returned home for his Christmas break via Manchester, and spoke about the reading there on December 14th. "Copperfield in the Free Trade Hall last Saturday was truly a magnificent scene."
He was in southern latitudes after Christmas, and on the 8th of January wrote from Torquay: "We are now in the region of small rooms, and therefore this trip will not be as profitable as the long one. I imagine the room here to be very small. Exeter I know, and that is small too. I am very much used up on the whole, for I cannot bear this moist warm climate. It would kill me very soon. And I have now got to the point of taking so much out of myself with Copperfield that I might as well do Richard Wardour. . . . This is a very pretty place—a compound of Hastings, Tunbridge Wells, and little bits of the hills about Naples; but I met four respirators as I came up from the station, and three pale curates without them who seemed in a bad way." They had been not bad omens, however. The success was good, at both Torquay and Exeter; and he closed the month, and this series of the country readings, at the great towns of Liverpool and Chester. "The beautiful St. George's Hall crowded to excess last night" (28th of January 1862) "and numbers turned away. Brilliant to see when lighted up, and for a reading simply perfect. You remember that a Liverpool audience is usually dull; but they put me on my[269] mettle last night, for I never saw such an audience—no, not even in Edinburgh! The agents (alone, and of course without any reference to ready money at the doors) had taken for the two readings two hundred pounds." But as the end approached the fatigues had told severely on him. He described himself sleeping horribly, and with head dazed and worn by gas and heat. Rest, before he could resume at the St. James's Hall in March, was become an absolute necessity.
He was in the southern regions after Christmas, and on January 8th wrote from Torquay: "We are now in the area of small rooms, so this trip won’t be as profitable as the longer one. I imagine the room here is very tiny. Exeter, which I know, is small too. I’m feeling pretty worn out overall because I can’t stand this humid warm climate. It would really take a toll on me. And I’ve now gotten to the point of exhausting myself with Copperfield that I might as well do Richard Wardour... This place is lovely—a mix of Hastings, Tunbridge Wells, and bits of the hills around Naples; but I encountered four people with respirators as I came up from the station, and three pale curates without them who looked pretty rough." They hadn't been bad signs, though. The success was good in both Torquay and Exeter; and he wrapped up the month, and this series of country readings, in the major cities of Liverpool and Chester. "The beautiful St. George's Hall was packed to the brim last night" (January 28, 1862) "and many had to be turned away. It was stunning to see when lit up, and for a reading, it was just perfect. You know that a Liverpool audience is usually pretty dull; but they really impressed me last night since I’ve never seen an audience like that—not even in Edinburgh! The agents (by themselves, of course without considering cash at the doors) had collected two hundred pounds for the two readings." But as the end drew near, the fatigue had taken its toll on him. He described himself as sleeping poorly, with his head feeling dazed and worn out from gas and heat. Rest, before he could return to St. James's Hall in March, had become absolutely necessary.
Two brief extracts from letters of the dates respectively of the 8th of April[247] and the 28th of June will sufficiently describe the London readings. "The money returns have been quite astounding. Think of £190 a night! The effect of Copperfield exceeds all the expectations which its success in the country led me to form. It seems to take people entirely by surprise. If this is not new to you, I have not a word of news. The rain that raineth every day seems to have washed news away or got it under water." That was in April. In June he wrote: "I finished my readings on Friday night to an enormous hall—nearly £200. The success has been throughout complete. It seems almost suicidal[270] to leave off with the town so full, but I don't like to depart from my public pledge. A man from Australia is in London ready to pay £10,000 for eight months there. If——" It was an If that troubled him for some time, and led to agitating discussion. The civil war having closed America, an increase made upon the just-named offer tempted him to Australia. He tried to familiarize himself with the fancy that he should thus also get new material for observation, and he went so far as to plan an Uncommercial Traveller Upside Down.[248] It is however very doubtful if such[271] a scheme would have been entertained for a moment, but for the unwonted difficulties of invention that were now found to beset a twenty-number story. Such a story had lately been in his mind, and he had just chosen the title for it (Our Mutual Friend); but still he halted and hesitated sorely. "If it was not," (he wrote on the 5th of October 1862) "for the hope of a gain that would make me more independent of the worst, I could not look the travel and absence and exertion in the face. I know perfectly well beforehand how unspeakably wretched I should be. But these renewed and larger offers tempt me. I can force myself to go aboard a ship, and I can force myself to do at that reading-desk what I have done a hundred times; but whether, with all this unsettled fluctuating distress in my mind, I could force an original book out of it, is another question." On the 22nd, still striving hard to find reasons to cope with the all but irresistible arguments against any such adventure, which indeed, with everything that then surrounded him, would have been little short of madness, he thus stated his experience of his two circuits of public reading. "Remember that at home here the thing has never missed fire, but invariably does more the second time than it did[272] the first; and also that I have got so used to it, and have worked so hard at it, as to get out of it more than I ever thought was in it for that purpose. I think all the probabilities for such a country as Australia are immense." The terrible difficulty was that the home argument struck both ways. "If I were to go it would be a penance and a misery, and I dread the thought more than I can possibly express. The domestic life of the Readings is all but intolerable to me when I am away for a few weeks at a time merely, and what would it be——." On the other hand it was also a thought of home, far beyond the mere personal loss or gain of it, that made him willing still to risk even so much misery and penance; and he had a fancy that it might be possible to take his eldest daughter with him. "It is useless and needless for me to say what the conflict in my own mind is. How painfully unwilling I am to go, and yet how painfully sensible that perhaps I ought to go—with all the hands upon my skirts that I cannot fail to feel and see there, whenever I look round. It is a struggle of no common sort, as you will suppose, you who know the circumstances of the struggler." It closed at once when he clearly saw that to take any of his family with him, and make satisfactory arrangement for the rest during such an absence, would be impossible. By this time also he began to find his way to the new story, and better hopes and spirits had returned.
Two short excerpts from letters dated April 8[247] and June 28 describe the London readings well. "The money returns have been incredible. Imagine earning £190 a night! The impact of Copperfield surpasses all the expectations I had based on its success in the country. It seems to completely surprise people. If that’s not news to you, I have nothing else to share. The rain that pours every day seems to have washed away all news or buried it." That was in April. In June he wrote: "I finished my readings on Friday night in a huge hall—nearly £200. The success has been complete throughout. It feels almost absurd to stop with the town so full, but I don't want to go back on my public promise. A man from Australia is in London ready to pay £10,000 for eight months there. If——" This was an If that troubled him for a while and led to anxious discussions. The civil war having ended in America, an increased offer tempted him to Australia. He tried to convince himself that this could also give him new material for observation, and he even considered planning an Uncommercial Traveller Upside Down.[248] However, it is very doubtful if such a plan would have been considered for a moment, if not for the unusual difficulties of coming up with ideas that he now faced while working on a twenty-number story. He had recently been thinking about such a story and had just chosen its title (Our Mutual Friend); but still, he hesitated deeply. "If it wasn't," (he wrote on October 5, 1862) "for the hope of gaining something that would make me more independent of the worst, I couldn't face the travel, absence, and effort. I know perfectly well beforehand how incredibly miserable I would be. But these renewed and larger offers tempt me. I can force myself to board a ship, and I can force myself to do at that reading-desk what I've done a hundred times; but whether, with all this unsettled distress in my mind, I could force an original book out of it, is another question." On the 22nd, still struggling to find reasons to deal with the almost irresistible arguments against such an adventure, which would have been little short of madness given everything surrounding him, he described his experience from his two public reading tours. "Remember that at home this act has never failed, but actually does better the second time than the first; and also that I have gotten so used to it, and have worked so hard at it, that I draw out more from it than I ever thought was possible. I think the possibilities for a country like Australia are immense." The terrible challenge was that the home argument worked both ways. "If I were to go, it would be a burden and a misery, and I dread the thought more than I can express. The domestic life of the Readings is almost unbearable for me when I'm away for just a few weeks, so what would it be like—." On the other hand, thoughts of home, beyond just personal loss or gain, made him willing to risk such misery and burden; and he fancied it might be possible to take his eldest daughter with him. "It's pointless for me to say what the conflict in my mind is. How painfully unwilling I am to go, and yet how painfully aware that perhaps I should go—with all the people pulling at my skirts that I can't help but feel and see every time I look around. It’s a struggle of no ordinary kind, as you can imagine, knowing the circumstances of the person struggling." It ended abruptly when he clearly realized that taking any family member with him and arranging for the rest during such an absence would be impossible. By this point, he also began to find his way toward the new story, and better hopes and spirits had returned.
In January 1863 he had taken his daughter and his sister-in-law to Paris, and he read twice at the Embassy in behalf of the British Charitable Fund, the success being such that he consented to read twice[273] again.[249] He passed his birthday of that year (the 7th of the following month) at Arras. "You will remember me to-day, I know. Thanks for it. An odd birthday, but I am as little out of heart as you would have me be—floored now and then, but coming up again at the call of Time. I wanted to see this town, birthplace of our amiable Sea Green" (Robespierre); "and I find a Grande Place so very remarkable and picturesque that it is astonishing how people miss it. Here too I found, in a bye-country place just near, a Fair going on, with a Religious Richardson's in it—Théatre Religieux—'donnant six fois par jour, l'histoire de la Croix en tableaux vivants, depuis la naissance de notre Seigneur jusqu'à son sepulture. Aussi l'immolation d'Isaac, par son père Abraham.' It was just before nightfall when I came upon it; and one of the three wise men was up to his eyes in lamp oil, hanging the moderators. A woman in blue and fleshings (whether an angel or Joseph's wife I don't know) was addressing the crowd through an enormous speaking-trumpet; and a very small boy with a property lamb (I leave you to judge who he was) was standing on his head on a barrel-organ." Returning to England by Boulogne in the same year, as he stepped into the Folkestone boat he encountered a friend, Mr. Charles Manby (for, in recording a trait of character so pleasing and honourable, it is not necessary that I[274] should suppress the name), also passing over to England. "Taking leave of Manby was a shabby man of whom I had some remembrance, but whom I could not get into his place in my mind. Noticing when we stood out of the harbour that he was on the brink of the pier, waving his hat in a desolate manner, I said to Manby, 'Surely I know that man.'—'I should think you did,' said he: 'Hudson!' He is living—just living—at Paris, and Manby had brought him on. He said to Manby at parting, 'I shall not have a good dinner again, till you come back.' I asked Manby why he stuck to him? He said, Because he (Hudson) had so many people in his power, and had held his peace; and because he (Manby) saw so many Notabilities grand with him now, who were always grovelling for 'shares' in the days of his grandeur."
In January 1863, he took his daughter and sister-in-law to Paris, where he read twice at the Embassy for the British Charitable Fund. The success was so great that he agreed to read again two more times[273]. He celebrated his birthday that year (on the 7th of the following month) in Arras. "I know you’ll remember me today. Thanks for that. It’s a strange birthday, but I'm not as down as you might think—knocked down sometimes, but getting back up again when Time calls. I wanted to see this town, the birthplace of our amiable Sea Green" (Robespierre); "and I find the Grande Place so remarkable and picturesque that it’s surprising how people overlook it. Here, too, I found a little fair nearby, featuring a Religious Richardson's—Religious Theater—'giving six performances a day, telling the story of the Cross in living pictures, from the birth of our Lord to his burial. Also, the sacrifice of Isaac by his father Abraham.' I stumbled upon it just before nightfall; and one of the three wise men was knee-deep in lamp oil, adjusting the lights. A woman in blue and flesh-colored tights (whether she was an angel or Joseph’s wife, I can't say) was addressing the crowd through a huge speaking trumpet; and a very small boy with a toy lamb (you can guess who he was) was balancing on his head on a barrel-organ." Returning to England via Boulogne later that year, as he boarded the Folkestone boat, he ran into a friend, Mr. Charles Manby (and it’s worth mentioning him for the pleasant character trait he exhibits), who was also traveling back to England. "As we said goodbye to Manby, there was a shabby man I vaguely remembered, but I couldn't place him. When we got out of the harbor and I saw him standing at the edge of the pier, waving his hat in a forlorn way, I said to Manby, 'I’m sure I know that man.'—'I would think so,' he replied: 'Hudson!' He’s just surviving in Paris now, and Manby had brought him along. As they parted, Hudson told Manby, 'I won’t have a decent dinner again until you come back.' I asked Manby why he stuck with him. He said it was because Hudson had so many people under his influence and had kept quiet; and because he saw so many important figures now connected with him who used to grovel for ‘shares’ during his heyday."
Upon Dickens's arrival in London the second series of his readings was brought to a close; and opportunity may be taken, before describing the third, to speak of the manuscript volume found among his papers, containing Memoranda for use in his writings.
Upon Dickens's arrival in London, the second series of his readings came to an end; and before describing the third series, it's a good moment to talk about the manuscript volume discovered among his papers, which contains notes for use in his writings.
CHAPTER XII.
HINTS FOR BOOKS WRITTEN AND UNWRITTEN.
1855-1865.
Dickens began the Book of Memoranda for possible use in his work, to which occasional reference has been made, in January 1855, six months before the first page of Little Dorrit was written; and I find no allusion leading me to suppose, except in one very doubtful instance, that he had made addition to its entries, or been in the habit of resorting to them, after the date of Our Mutual Friend. It seems to comprise that interval of ten years in his life.
Charles Dickens started the Book of Memoranda for potential use in his writing, which has been referenced occasionally, in January 1855, six months before he wrote the first page of Little Dorrit; and I find no mention that would make me think, except for one very uncertain instance, that he added to its entries or regularly referred to them after the date of Our Mutual Friend. It appears to cover that ten-year period of his life.
In it were put down any hints or suggestions that occurred to him. A mere piece of imagery or fancy, it might be at one time; at another the outline of a subject or a character; then a bit of description or dialogue; no order or sequence being observed in any. Titles for stories were set down too, and groups of[276] names for the actors in them; not the least curious of the memoranda belonging to this class. More rarely, entry is made of some oddity of speech; and he has thus preserved in it, verbatim et literatim, what he declared to have been as startling a message as he ever received. A confidential servant at Tavistock House, having conferred on some proposed changes in his bed-room with the party that was to do the work, delivered this ultimatum to her master. "The gas-fitter says, sir, that he can't alter the fitting of your gas in your bed-room without taking up almost the ole of your bed-room floor, and pulling your room to pieces. He says, of course you can have it done if you wish, and he'll do it for you and make a good job of it, but he would have to destroy your room first, and go entirely under the jistes."[250]
He wrote down any hints or suggestions that came to him. Sometimes it was just a piece of imagery or a fancy idea; other times it was the outline of a topic or a character; then it might be a snippet of description or dialogue, with no particular order or sequence to any of it. He also noted titles for stories and groups of names for the characters in them, which were some of the more interesting notes he kept. More rarely, he would jot down something unusual he heard someone say; he managed to preserve what he claimed was one of the most surprising messages he ever received. A trusted servant at Tavistock House, after discussing some proposed changes to his bedroom with the person doing the work, delivered this message to him: “The gas-fitter says, sir, that he can't change the gas fitting in your bedroom without tearing up almost the whole floor and completely dismantling your room. He says, of course, you can have it done if you want, and he'll do a great job, but he would have to destroy your room first and go entirely under the joists.”[250]
It is very interesting in this book, last legacy as it is of the literary remains of such a writer, to compare the way in which fancies were worked out with their beginnings entered in its pages. Those therefore will first be taken that in some form or other appeared afterwards in his writings, with such reference to the latter as may enable the reader to make comparison for himself.
It’s fascinating in this book, being the final collection of the literary works of such a writer, to compare how ideas developed from their initial concepts written on its pages. We'll focus first on those that later appeared in some format in his writings, providing enough reference to the latter so that readers can make their own comparisons.
"Our House. Whatever it is, it is in a first-rate situation, and a fashionable neighbourhood. (Auctioneer called it 'a gentlemanly residence.') A series of little closets squeezed up into the corner of a dark street—but a Duke's Mansion round the corner. The[277] whole house just large enough to hold a vile smell. The air breathed in it, at the best of times, a kind of Distillation of Mews." He made it the home of the Barnacles in Little Dorrit.
"Our House. No matter what it is, it's in a prime location, in a trendy neighborhood. (The auctioneer called it 'a gentlemanly residence.') A series of small closets crammed into the corner of a dark street—but there's a Duke's Mansion just around the corner. The[277] entire house is just big enough to trap a terrible smell. The air in there, at best, is like a mix of unpleasant odors from the stables." He made it the home of the Barnacles in Little Dorrit.
What originally he meant to express by Mrs. Clennam in the same story has narrower limits, and a character less repellent, in the Memoranda than it assumed in the book. "Bed-ridden (or room-ridden) twenty—five-and-twenty—years; any length of time. As to most things, kept at a standstill all the while. Thinking of altered streets as the old streets—changed things as the unchanged things—the youth or girl I quarrelled with all those years ago, as the same youth or girl now. Brought out of doors by an unexpected exercise of my latent strength of character, and then how strange!"
What he originally wanted to convey through Mrs. Clennam in the same story has more limited boundaries and a less off-putting character in the Memoranda than it did in the book. "Stuck in bed (or stuck in my room) for twenty-five years; that’s such a long time. For the most part, life has just stood still during that time. I think of changed streets as if they are still the old streets—things that have changed feel like they haven't changed at all—the young person I argued with all those years ago feels like the same young person now. I was brought outside by a surprising burst of my hidden strength of character, and then it felt so strange!"
One of the people of the same story who becomes a prominent actor in it, Henry Gowan, a creation on which he prided himself as forcible and new, seems to have risen to his mind in this way. "I affect to believe that I would do anything myself for a ten-pound note, and that anybody else would. I affect to be always book-keeping in every man's case, and posting up a little account of good and evil with every one. Thus the greatest rascal becomes 'the dearest old fellow,' and there is much less difference than you would be inclined to suppose between an honest man and a scoundrel. While I affect to be finding good in most men, I am in reality decrying it where it really is, and setting it up where it is not. Might not a presentation of this far from uncommon class of character, if I could put it strongly enough, be likely to lead some[278] men to reflect, and change a little? I think it has never been done."
One of the characters in this story who becomes a key figure, Henry Gowan, is someone he takes pride in as being both striking and original—seems to have come to mind this way. "I like to think that I would do anything for a hundred bucks, and that everyone else would too. I like to pretend I'm keeping track of everyone’s actions, adding up their good and bad deeds. So, the worst crook becomes 'the sweetest guy,' and there's a lot less difference than you'd think between a decent person and a con artist. While I pretend to see the good in most people, I'm actually dismissing it where it genuinely exists and highlighting it where it doesn't. Would presenting this not-so-rare type of character, if I could portray it strongly enough, make some people think and possibly change a bit? I don't think it's ever been done."
In Little Dorrit also will be found a picture which seems to live with a more touching effect in his first pleasing fancy of it. "The ferryman on a peaceful river, who has been there from youth, who lives, who grows old, who does well, who does ill, who changes, who dies—the river runs six hours up and six hours down, the current sets off that point, the same allowance must be made for the drifting of the boat, the same tune is always played by the rippling water against the prow."
In Little Dorrit, there's also a scene that feels even more impactful in his initial delightful vision of it. "The ferryman on a calm river, who has been there since he was young, who lives, who ages, who does good, who does bad, who changes, who dies—the river flows six hours upstream and six hours downstream, the current moves from that point, the same adjustments must be considered for the drifting of the boat, and the same melody is always played by the gentle water against the bow."
Here was an entry made when the thought occurred to him of the close of old Dorrit's life. "First sign of the father failing and breaking down. Cancels long interval. Begins to talk about the turnkey who first called him the Father of the Marshalsea—as if he were still living. 'Tell Bob I want to speak to him. See if he is on the Lock, my dear.'" And here was the first notion of Clennam's reverse of fortune. "His falling into difficulty, and himself imprisoned in the Marshalsea. Then she, out of all her wealth and changed station, comes back in her old dress, and devotes herself in the old way."
Here’s an entry made when the thought of old Dorrit’s life coming to an end crossed his mind. “First sign of the father failing and breaking down. Cancels long gap. Starts talking about the guard who first called him the Father of the Marshalsea—as if he were still alive. ‘Tell Bob I want to talk to him. See if he’s on the Lock, my dear.’” And here was the first hint of Clennam’s change in fortune. “His falling into trouble, and finding himself locked up in the Marshalsea. Then she, from all her wealth and changed status, comes back in her old clothes and dedicates herself in the same way.”
He seems to have designed, for the sketches of society in the same tale, a "Full-length portrait of his lordship, surrounded by worshippers;" of which, beside that brief memorandum, only his first draft of the general outline was worked at. "Sensible men enough, agreeable men enough, independent men enough in a certain way;—but the moment they begin to circle round my lord, and to shine with a borrowed light[279] from his lordship, heaven and earth how mean and subservient! What a competition and outbidding of each other in servility."
He seems to have created, for the sketches of society in the same story, a "full-length portrait of his lordship, surrounded by admirers;" of which, besides that brief note, only his first draft of the general outline was developed. "There are plenty of sensible men, agreeable men, independent men in some ways;—but the moment they start to revolve around my lord, and to shine with a borrowed light[279] from his lordship, good grief, how petty and subservient they become! It's just a competition to outdo each other in flattery."
The last of the Memoranda hints which were used in the story whose difficulties at its opening seem first to have suggested them, ran thus: "The unwieldy ship taken in tow by the snorting little steam tug"—by which was prefigured the patriarch Casby and his agent Panks.
The last of the hints in the memoranda used in the story, which seemed to suggest the difficulties at its beginning, was: "The clumsy ship being towed by the puffing little steam tug"—which represented the patriarch Casby and his agent Panks.
In a few lines are the germ of the tale called Hunted Down: "Devoted to the Destruction of a man. Revenge built up on love. The secretary in the Wainewright case, who had fallen in love (or supposed he had) with the murdered girl."—The hint on which he worked in his description of the villain of that story, is also in the Memoranda. "The man with his hair parted straight up the front of his head, like an aggravating gravel-walk. Always presenting it to you. 'Up here, if you please. Neither to the right nor left. Take me exactly in this direction. Straight up here. Come off the grass—'"
In just a few lines, the essence of the story called Hunted Down: "Focused on destroying a man. Revenge fueled by love. The secretary in the Wainewright case, who thought he was in love with the murdered girl."—The idea he used for the villain in that story is also found in the Memoranda. "The guy with his hair styled straight up the front, like an annoying gravel path. Always putting it in front of you. 'Right here, if you don't mind. Don’t go to the right or left. Take me exactly this way. Straight up here. Stay off the grass—'"
His first intention as to the Tale of Two Cities was to write it upon a plan proposed in this manuscript book. "How as to a story in two periods—with a lapse of time between, like a French Drama? Titles for such a notion. Time! The Leaves of the Forest. Scattered Leaves. The Great Wheel. Round and Round. Old Leaves. Long Ago. Far Apart. Fallen Leaves. Five and Twenty Years. Years and Years. Rolling Years. Day after Day. Felled Trees. Memory Carton. Rolling Stones. Two Generations." That special title of Memory Carton shows that what led to the greatest success of[280] the book as written was always in his mind; and another of the memoranda is this rough hint of the character itself. "The drunken?—dissipated?—What?—Lion—and his Jackall and Primer, stealing down to him at unwonted hours."
His initial idea for the Tale of Two Cities was to write it based on a plan outlined in this manuscript book. "What about a story set in two periods—with a time gap in between, similar to a French Drama? Here are some title ideas for that concept: Time! The Leaves of the Forest. Scattered Leaves. The Great Wheel. Going Round and Round. Old Leaves. Long Ago. Far Apart. Fallen Leaves. Twenty-Five Years. Years and Years. Passing Years. Day after Day. Cut Trees. Memory Box. Rolling Stones. Two Generations." That particular title, Memory Carton, indicates that the key to the book’s eventual success was always on his mind; and another note is this rough idea of the character itself. "The drunken?—dissipated?—What?—Lion—and his Jackall and Primer, sneaking down to him at unusual hours."
The studies of Silas Wegg and his patron as they exist in Our Mutual Friend, are hardly such good comedy as in the form which the first notion of them seems to have intended. "Gibbon's Decline and Fall. The two characters. One reporting to the other as he reads. Both getting confused as to whether it is not all going on now." In the same story may be traced, more or less clearly, other fancies which had found their first expression in the Memoranda. A touch for Bella Wilfer is here. "Buying poor shabby—father?—a new hat. So incongruous that it makes him like African King Boy, or King George; who is usually full dressed when he has nothing upon him but a cocked hat or a waistcoat." Here undoubtedly is the voice of Podsnap. "I stand by my friends and acquaintances;—not for their sakes, but because they are my friends and acquaintances. I know them, I have licensed them, they have taken out my certificate. Ergo, I champion them as myself." To the same redoubtable person another trait clearly belongs. "And by denying a thing, supposes that he altogether puts it out of existence." A third very perfectly expresses the boy, ready for mischief, who does all the work there is to be done in Eugene Wrayburn's place of business. "The office boy for ever looking out of window, who never has anything to do."
The interactions between Silas Wegg and his patron in Our Mutual Friend aren't as funny as they might have originally seemed. "Gibbon's Decline and Fall. The two characters. One updates the other as he reads. Both getting mixed up about whether it's all happening right now." In the same story, you can see other ideas that first appeared in the Memoranda. There's a reference to Bella Wilfer here: "Buying poor shabby—dad?—a new hat. It's so out of place that it makes him look like an African King Boy, or King George; who is usually dressed to impress even when he has nothing on except a cocked hat or a waistcoat." Here, you can clearly hear Podsnap's voice: "I stand by my friends and acquaintances;—not for their sake, but because they are my friends and acquaintances. I know them, I have approved them, they have my certificate. Therefore, I support them as if they were myself." Another characteristic that clearly belongs to this formidable character is, "And by denying something, he thinks he's completely making it go away." A third trait perfectly captures the mischievous boy who does all the work at Eugene Wrayburn's office: "The office boy who is always looking out the window and never seems to have anything to do."
The poor wayward purposeless good-hearted master[281] of the boy, Eugene himself, is as evidently in this: "If they were great things, I, the untrustworthy man in little things, would do them earnestly—But O No, I wouldn't!" What follows has a more direct reference; being indeed almost literally copied in the story. "As to the question whether I, Eugene, lying ill and sick even unto death, may be consoled by the representation that coming through this illness, I shall begin a new life, and have energy and purpose and all I have yet wanted: 'I hope I should, but I know I shouldn't. Let me die, my dear.'"
The poor, wandering, aimless, yet kind-hearted master[281] of the boy, Eugene himself, is clearly shown in this: "If they were important things, I, the unreliable person in small matters, would take them seriously—But oh no, I wouldn’t!" What comes next has a more straightforward meaning; it's almost exactly replicated in the story. "Regarding the question of whether I, Eugene, lying here sick and close to death, can find comfort in the idea that after this illness, I will start a new life, with energy and purpose and everything else I've ever wanted: 'I hope I would, but I know I wouldn't. Let me die, my dear.'"
In connection with the same book, the last in that form which he lived to complete, another fancy may be copied from which, though not otherwise worked out in the tale, the relation of Lizzie Hexam to her brother was taken. "A man, and his wife—or daughter—or niece. The man, a reprobate and ruffian; the woman (or girl) with good in her, and with compunctions. He believes nothing, and defies everything; yet has suspicions always, that she is 'praying against' his evil schemes, and making them go wrong. He is very much opposed to this, and is always angrily harping on it. 'If she must pray, why can't she pray in their favour, instead of going against 'em? She's always ruining me—she always is—and calls that, Duty! There's a religious person! Calls it Duty to fly in my face! Calls it Duty to go sneaking against me!'"
In connection with the same book, the last one he lived to finish, another idea may be drawn from which, although not fully developed in the story, the relationship between Lizzie Hexam and her brother was taken. "A man and his wife—or daughter—or niece. The man, a scoundrel and bully; the woman (or girl) has good in her and feels guilt. He believes in nothing and challenges everything; yet he always suspects that she is 'praying against' his wicked plans and causing them to fail. He is very much against this and constantly complains about it. 'If she must pray, why can’t she pray for them instead of against them? She’s always ruining me—she always is—and calls that, Duty! What a religious person! Calls it Duty to stand up to me! Calls it Duty to sneak around behind my back!'"
Other fancies preserved in his Memoranda were left wholly unemployed, receiving from him no more permanent form of any kind than that which they have in this touching record; and what most people would probably think the most attractive and original of all[282] the thoughts he had thus set down for future use, are those that were never used.
Other ideas kept in his notes were left completely untouched, taking no more lasting form from him than what they have in this poignant record; and what most people would likely find the most appealing and unique of all the thoughts he had written down for future use are those that were never utilized.
Here were his first rough notes for the opening of a story. "Beginning with the breaking up of a large party of guests at a country house: house left lonely with the shrunken family in it: guests spoken of, and introduced to the reader that way.—Or, beginning with a house abandoned by a family fallen into reduced circumstances. Their old furniture there, and numberless tokens of their old comforts. Inscriptions under the bells downstairs—'Mr. John's Room,' 'Miss Caroline's Room.' Great gardens trimly kept to attract a tenant: but no one in them. A landscape without figures. Billiard room: table covered up, like a body. Great stables without horses, and great coach-houses without carriages. Grass growing in the chinks of the stone-paving, this bright cold winter day. Downhills." Another opening had also suggested itself to him. "Open a story by bringing two strongly contrasted places and strongly contrasted sets of people, into the connexion necessary for the story, by means of an electric message. Describe the message—be the message—flashing along through space, over the earth, and under the sea."[251] Connected with which in some way[283] would seem to be this other notion, following it in the Memoranda. "Representing London—or Paris, or any other great place—in the new light of being actually unknown to all the people in the story, and only taking the colour of their fears and fancies and opinions. So getting a new aspect, and being unlike itself. An odd unlikeness of itself."
Here are his initial rough notes for starting a story. "Start with the breakup of a large gathering at a country house: the house left empty with a smaller family inside: guests are mentioned and introduced to the reader this way.—Either, start with a house deserted by a family that has fallen on hard times. Their old furniture is still there, along with countless reminders of their past comfort. Labels under the bells downstairs—'Mr. John's Room,' 'Miss Caroline's Room.' Beautiful gardens meticulously maintained to attract a tenant: but no one is there. A landscape without people. The billiard room: the table covered up, like a body. Large stables without horses, and grand coach houses without carriages. Grass growing in the cracks of the stone pavement on this bright, cold winter day. Downhills." He also had another opening idea. "Start a story by connecting two very different places and very different groups of people through an electric message. Describe the message—be the message—flashing through space, over land, and beneath the sea."[251] Connected to this in some way[283] seems to be this other idea that follows in the notes. "Representing London—or Paris, or any other major city—in a new light, being completely unknown to all the characters in the story, only reflecting their fears, fantasies, and opinions. Thus gaining a new perspective, and being unlike itself. An odd unlikeness of itself."
The subjects for stories are various, and some are striking. There was one he clung to much, and thought of frequently as in a special degree available for a series of papers in his periodical; but when he came to close quarters with it the difficulties were found to be too great. "English landscape. The beautiful prospect, trim fields, clipped hedges, everything so neat and orderly—gardens, houses, roads. Where are the people who do all this? There must be a great many of them, to do it. Where are they all? And are they, too, so well kept and so fair to see? Suppose the foregoing to be wrought out by an Englishman: say, from China: who knows nothing about his native country." To which may be added a fancy that savours of the same mood of discontent, political and social. "How do I know that I, a man, am to learn from insects—unless it is to learn how little my littlenesses are? All that botheration in the hive about the queen bee, may be, in little, me and the court circular."
The topics for stories are diverse, and some are really striking. There was one he was particularly attached to and thought about often, considering it especially suitable for a series of articles in his magazine; but when he tried to dig deeper, he found the challenges too overwhelming. "English landscape. The beautiful view, well-kept fields, trimmed hedges, everything so neat and orderly—gardens, houses, roads. Where are the people who make all this happen? There must be a lot of them to manage it all. Where are they? And are they also so well-kept and nice to look at? Imagine this being described by an Englishman: say, someone from China: who knows nothing about his home country." To this, we can add a notion that reflects a similar sense of dissatisfaction, both politically and socially. "How do I know that I, as a man, am supposed to learn from insects—unless it's just to realize how trivial my own trivialities are? All that fuss in the hive about the queen bee might be just like me and the newspaper gossip."
A domestic story he had met with in the State Trials struck him greatly by its capabilities, and I may preface it by mentioning another subject, not entered in the Memoranda, which for a long time impressed him as capable of attractive treatment. It was after reading[284] one of the witch-trials that this occurred to him; and the heroine was to be a girl who for a special purpose had taken a witch's disguise, and whose trick was not discovered until she was actually at the stake. Here is the State Trials story as told by Dickens. "There is a case in the State Trials, where a certain officer made love to a (supposed) miser's daughter, and ultimately induced her to give her father slow poison, while nursing him in sickness. Her father discovered it, told her so, forgave her, and said 'Be patient my dear—I shall not live long, even if I recover: and then you shall have all my wealth.' Though penitent then, she afterwards poisoned him again (under the same influence), and successfully. Whereupon it appeared that the old man had no money at all, and had lived on a small annuity which died with him, though always feigning to be rich. He had loved this daughter with great affection."
A domestic story he came across in the State Trials really struck him with its potential, and I should mention another topic, not included in the notes, that had impressed him for a long time as having interesting possibilities. This thought occurred to him after reading[284] one of the witch trials; the main character was to be a girl who, for a specific reason, wore a witch's disguise, and her ruse wouldn’t be discovered until she was actually at the stake. Here’s the State Trials story as told by Dickens: “There’s a case in the State Trials where a certain officer fell in love with a (supposed) miser's daughter and ultimately persuaded her to poison her father slowly while caring for him during his illness. Her father found out, confronted her, forgave her, and said, ‘Be patient, my dear—I won’t live long, even if I recover; then you’ll inherit all my wealth.’ Although she felt regret at that moment, she later poisoned him again (under the same influence) and succeeded. It turned out that the old man had no money at all and had lived on a small annuity that died with him, all while pretending to be wealthy. He had loved his daughter dearly.”
A theme touching closely on ground that some might think dangerous, is sketched in the following fancy. "The father (married young) who, in perfect innocence, venerates his son's young wife, as the realization of his ideal of woman. (He not happy in his own choice.) The son slights her, and knows nothing of her worth. The father watches her, protects her, labours for her, endures for her,—is for ever divided between his strong natural affection for his son as his son, and his resentment against him as this young creature's husband." Here is another, less dangerous, which he took from an actual occurrence made known to him when he was at Bonchurch. "The idea of my being brought up by my mother (me the narrator), my[285] father being dead; and growing up in this belief until I find that my father is the gentleman I have sometimes seen, and oftener heard of, who has the handsome young wife, and the dog I once took notice of when I was a little child, and who lives in the great house and drives about."
A theme that's a bit risky is explored in the following imagination. "The father (who married young) completely innocently idolizes his son's young wife, seeing her as the embodiment of his ideal woman. (He isn’t happy with his own choice.) The son disregards her and has no idea of her value. The father observes her, protects her, works for her, and makes sacrifices for her—he is constantly torn between his strong natural love for his son as his son and his resentment towards him as this young woman's husband." Here's another, less risky one, which he got from a real event he learned about when he was in Bonchurch. "The idea of my being raised by my mother (me as the narrator), my father having passed away; and growing up believing this until I discover that my father is the man I've sometimes seen, and even more often heard of, who has the beautiful young wife and the dog I noticed as a little child, and who lives in the big house and drives around."
Very admirable is this. "The girl separating herself from the lover who has shewn himself unworthy—loving him still—living single for his sake—but never more renewing their old relations. Coming to him when they are both grown old, and nursing him in his last illness." Nor is the following less so. "Two girls mis-marrying two men. The man who has evil in him, dragging the superior woman down. The man who has good in him, raising the inferior woman up." Dickens would have been at his best in working out both fancies.
Very admirable is this. "The girl separating herself from the lover who has shown himself unworthy—still loving him—living single for his sake—but never renewing their old relationship. Coming to him when they are both old, and taking care of him in his final illness." Nor is the following any less impressive. "Two girls marrying the wrong men. The man with bad intentions dragging the superior woman down. The man with good intentions lifting the inferior woman up." Dickens would have thrived in exploring both ideas.
In some of the most amusing of his sketches of character, women also take the lead. "The lady un peu passée, who is determined to be interesting. No matter how much I love that person—nay, the more so for that very reason—I must flatter, and bother, and be weak and apprehensive and nervous, and what not. If I were well and strong, agreeable and self-denying, my friend might forget me." Another not remotely belonging to the same family is as neatly hit off. "The sentimental woman feels that the comic, undesigning, unconscious man, is 'Her Fate.'—I her fate? God bless my soul, it puts me into a cold perspiration to think of it. I her fate? How can I be her fate? I don't mean to be. I don't want to have anything to do with her—Sentimental woman perceives nevertheless that Destiny must be accomplished."[286]
In some of his funniest character sketches, women really take center stage. "The slightly past-her-prime lady who is determined to be interesting. No matter how much I love her—actually, it's even more because of that—I gotta flatter, annoy, and be weak and anxious and all that. If I were healthy and strong, pleasant and selfless, my friend might forget about me." Another character, completely different from the first, is described just as well. "The sentimental woman believes that the clueless, unintentional man is 'Her Fate.'—Me, her fate? Goodness, just thinking about it makes me break out in a cold sweat. Me, her fate? How could I be her fate? I really don’t want to be. I want nothing to do with her—yet the sentimental woman realizes that Destiny must be fulfilled."[286]
Other portions of a female group are as humorously sketched and hardly less entertaining. "The enthusiastically complimentary person, who forgets you in her own flowery prosiness: as—'I have no need to say to a person of your genius and feeling, and wide range of experience'—and then, being shortsighted, puts up her glass to remember who you are."—"Two sisters" (these were real people known to him). "One going in for being generally beloved (which she is not by any means); and the other for being generally hated (which she needn't be)."—"The bequeathed maid-servant, or friend. Left as a legacy. And a devil of a legacy too."—"The woman who is never on any account to hear of anything shocking. For whom the world is to be of barley-sugar."—"The lady who lives on her enthusiasm; and hasn't a jot."—"Bright-eyed creature selling jewels. The stones and the eyes." Much significance is in the last few words. One may see to what uses Dickens would have turned them.
Other parts of a female group are equally humorously portrayed and just as entertaining. "The overly complimentary person who forgets you in her own flowery chatter: like—'I don’t need to explain anything to someone with your talent and experience'—and then, being shortsighted, raises her glasses to remember who you are."—"Two sisters" (these were real people he knew). "One striving to be generally adored (which she definitely isn’t); and the other for being generally disliked (which she doesn’t have to be)."—"The maid or friend inherited as a legacy. And quite a troublesome legacy too."—"The woman who is never to hear anything shocking. For whom the world should be made of sweets."—"The lady who thrives on her enthusiasm; and has none to spare."—"A bright-eyed woman selling jewelry. The stones and the eyes." There’s a lot of meaning in those last few words. One can imagine how Dickens would have used them.
A more troubled note is sounded in another of these female characters. "I am a common woman—fallen. Is it devilry in me—is it a wicked comfort—what is it—that induces me to be always tempting other women down, while I hate myself!" This next, with as much truth in it, goes deeper than the last. "The prostitute who will not let one certain youth approach her. 'O let there be some one in the world, who having an inclination towards me has not gratified it, and has not known me in my degradation!' She almost loving him.—Suppose, too, this touch in her could not be believed in by his mother or mistress: by some handsome and proudly virtuous woman, always revolting[287] from her." A more agreeable sketch than either follows, though it would not please M. Taine so well. "The little baby-like married woman—so strange in her new dignity, and talking with tears in her eyes, of her sisters 'and all of them' at home. Never from home before, and never going back again." Another from the same manuscript volume not less attractive, which was sketched in his own home, I gave upon a former page.
A more troubled note emerges in another of these female characters. "I’m just an ordinary woman – fallen. Is this devilry in me? Is it a wicked comfort? What is it that makes me keep tempting other women to fall, while I hate myself?" This next thought, just as true, goes even deeper. "The prostitute who won’t let one specific guy close to her. 'Oh, let there be someone in the world who has feelings for me but hasn’t acted on them and doesn’t know me in my degradation!' She almost loves him. – Imagine if this part of her couldn’t be understood by his mother or girlfriend: by some beautiful and proudly virtuous woman who always turns away from her." A more pleasant depiction than either follows, although it might not please M. Taine quite as much. "The little baby-like married woman—so strange in her new role, speaking with tears in her eyes about her sisters 'and all of them' back home. Having never been away before, and never going back again." Another sketch from the same manuscript volume, equally engaging, which was drawn in his own home, I shared on a previous page.
The female character in its relations with the opposite sex has lively illustration in the Memoranda. "The man who is governed by his wife, and is heartily despised in consequence by all other wives; who still want to govern their husbands, notwithstanding." An alarming family pair follows that. "The playful—and scratching—family. Father and daughter." And here is another. "The agreeable (and wicked) young-mature man, and his devoted sister." What next was set down he had himself partly seen; and, by enquiry at the hospital named, had ascertained the truth of the rest. "The two people in the Incurable Hospital.—The poor incurable girl lying on a water-bed, and the incurable man who has a strange flirtation with her; comes and makes confidences to her; snips and arranges her plants; and rehearses to her the comic songs(!) by writing which he materially helps out his living."[252]
The female character's interactions with men are vividly illustrated in the Memoranda. "The man who is controlled by his wife, and is consequently looked down upon by all other wives; who still want to control their husbands, nonetheless." An alarming family duo follows this. "The playful—and scratching—family. Father and daughter." And here’s another. "The charming (and somewhat wicked) young man, and his devoted sister." What he noted next he had partly witnessed; and by checking with the mentioned hospital, he confirmed the rest. "The two individuals at the Incurable Hospital.—The poor incurable girl lying on a water-bed, and the incurable man who has a peculiar flirtation with her; he comes and shares secrets with her; trims and organizes her plants; and rehearses comic songs(!) for her, the writing of which contributes to his income."[252]
Two lighter figures are very pleasantly touched. "Set of circumstances which suddenly bring an easy, airy fellow into near relations with people he knows nothing about, and has never even seen. This, through his being thrown in the way of the innocent young personage of the story. 'Then there is Uncle Sam to be considered,' says she. 'Aye to be sure,' says he, 'so there is! By Jupiter, I forgot Uncle Sam. He's a rock ahead, is Uncle Sam. He must be considered, of course; he must be smoothed down; he must be cleared out of the way. To be sure. I never thought of Uncle Sam.—By the bye, who is Uncle Sam?'"
Two lighter figures are happily engaged in conversation. "A strange set of circumstances that suddenly brings an easy-going guy close to people he knows nothing about and has never even met. This happens because he encounters the innocent young person at the center of the story. 'Then there's Uncle Sam to think about,' she says. 'Oh right,' he replies, 'I totally forgot about Uncle Sam. He's a big obstacle, Uncle Sam. We have to take him into account, of course; we need to smooth things over with him; he has to be out of the way. Absolutely. I never considered Uncle Sam.—By the way, who is Uncle Sam?'"
There are several such sketches as that, to set against the groups of women; and some have Dickens's favourite vein of satire in them. "The man whose vista is always stopped up by the image of Himself. Looks down a long walk, and can't see round himself, or over himself, or beyond himself. Is always blocking up his own way. Would be such a good thing for him, if he could knock himself down." Another picture of selfishness is touched with greater delicacy. "'Too good' to be grateful to, or dutiful to, or anything else that ought to be. 'I won't thank you: you are too good.'—'Don't ask me to marry you: you are too good.'—In short, I don't particularly mind ill-using you, and[289] being selfish with you: for you are so good. Virtue its own reward!" A third, which seems to reverse the dial, is but another face of it: frankly avowing faults, which are virtues. "In effect—I admit I am generous, amiable, gentle, magnanimous. Reproach me—I deserve it—I know my faults—I have striven in vain to get the better of them." Dickens would have made much, too, of the working out of the next. "The knowing man in distress, who borrows a round sum of a generous friend. Comes, in depression and tears, dines, gets the money, and gradually cheers up over his wine, as he obviously entertains himself with the reflection that his friend is an egregious fool to have lent it to him, and that he would have known better." And so of this other. "The man who invariably says apposite things (in the way of reproof or sarcasm) that he don't mean. Astonished when they are explained to him."
There are several sketches like that, contrasting with the groups of women, and some have Dickens's favorite sense of satire in them. "The guy whose view is always blocked by his own image. He looks down a long path and can’t see around himself, over himself, or beyond himself. He’s always getting in his own way. It would be great for him if he could just take himself down." Another picture of selfishness is handled with more subtlety. "'Too good' to be grateful to, or dutiful to, or anything else that should be. 'I won’t thank you: you’re too good.'—'Don’t ask me to marry you: you’re too good.'—In short, I don’t really care about mistreating you and being selfish with you, because you are so good. Virtue is its own reward!" A third one, which seems to turn the tables, is just another version of it: openly admitting faults that are actually virtues. "Honestly—I admit I’m generous, friendly, gentle, and magnanimous. Criticize me—I deserve it—I know my faults—I have tried in vain to overcome them." Dickens would have had a lot to say about the next one too. "The guy who knows how to play it when he’s in trouble, borrowing a chunk of money from a generous friend. He shows up, down in the dumps and in tears, has dinner, gets the cash, and gradually perks up over his wine, as he clearly enjoys the thought that his friend is a total fool for lending it to him, and that he would have been smarter." And so with this other one. "The guy who always says perfectly timed things (whether it's criticism or sarcasm) that he doesn't really mean. Shocked when they’re explained to him."
Here is a fancy that I remember him to have been more than once bent upon making use of: but the opportunity never came. "The two men to be guarded against, as to their revenge. One, whom I openly hold in some serious animosity, whom I am at the pains to wound and defy, and whom I estimate as worth wounding and defying;—the other, whom I treat as a sort of insect, and contemptuously and pleasantly flick aside with my glove. But, it turns out to be the latter who is the really dangerous man; and, when I expect the blow from the other, it comes from him."
Here’s a notion I remember him wanting to act on more than once, but the chance never arrived. "There are two men I need to watch out for when it comes to revenge. One, I openly dislike, and I go out of my way to hurt and challenge him, believing he’s worth that effort. The other, I treat like a bug, dismissively flicking him away with my glove. But, it turns out the second man is the real threat; just when I expect the attack from the first, it actually comes from him."
We have the master hand in the following bit of dialogue, which takes wider application than that for which it appears to have been intended.[290]
We have a skilled touch in the following dialogue, which has a broader relevance than what it seems to have been meant for.[290]
"'There is some virtue in him too.'
"There’s some good in him too."
"'Virtue! Yes. So there is in any grain of seed in a seedsman's shop—but you must put it in the ground, before you can get any good out of it.'
"'Virtue! Yes. There's definitely some in every grain of seed in a seedsman's shop—but you have to plant it in the ground before you can benefit from it.'"
"'Do you mean that he must be put in the ground before any good comes of him?'
"'Do you mean that he has to be buried before any good can come from him?'"
"'Indeed I do. You may call it burying him, or you may call it sowing him, as you like. You must set him in the earth, before you get any good of him.'"
"'Of course I do. You can call it burying him, or you can call it sowing him, whichever you prefer. You have to put him in the ground before you can benefit from him.'"
One of the entries is a list of persons and places meant to have been made subjects for special description, and it will awaken regret that only as to one of them (the Mugby Refreshments) his intention was fulfilled. "A Vestryman. A Briber. A Station Waiting-Room. Refreshments at Mugby. A Physician's Waiting-Room. The Royal Academy. An Antiquary's house. A Sale Room. A Picture Gallery (for sale). A Waste-paper Shop. A Post-Office. A Theatre."
One of the entries is a list of people and places that were supposed to be highlighted, and it will bring a sense of disappointment that only one of them (the Mugby Refreshments) was actually completed. "A Vestry Member. A Briber. A Train Station Waiting Area. Refreshments at Mugby. A Doctor's Waiting Room. The Royal Academy. An Antique Dealer's house. An Auction Room. An Art Gallery (for sale). A Waste-paper Shop. A Post Office. A Theatre."
All will have been given that have particular interest or value, from this remarkable volume, when the thoughts and fancies I proceed to transcribe have been put before the reader.
All will have received what has particular interest or value from this remarkable book when the thoughts and ideas I’m about to write down have been shared with the reader.
"The man who is incapable of his own happiness. Or who is always in pursuit of happiness. Result, Where is happiness to be found then? Surely not Everywhere? Can that be so, after all? Is this my experience?"
"The man who can't find his own happiness. Or who is always chasing after it. Result, Where can happiness be found then? Definitely not Everywhere? Can that really be true, after all? Is this my experience?"
"The people who persist in defining and analysing[291] their (and everybody else's) moral qualities, motives and what not, at once in the narrowest spirit and the most lumbering manner;—as if one should put up an enormous scaffolding for the building of a pigstye."
"The people who keep defining and analyzing[291] their (and everyone else's) moral qualities, motives, and so on, in the most narrow-minded and clumsy way;—as if someone were to set up a huge scaffolding to build a pigsty."
"The house-full of Toadies and Humbugs. They all know and despise one another; but—partly to keep their hands in, and partly to make out their own individual cases—pretend not to detect one another."
"The house is filled with fake friends and pretentious people. They all know and can't stand each other; but—partly to maintain appearances and partly to defend their own interests—they pretend not to notice each other."
"People realising immense sums of money, imaginatively—speculatively—counting their chickens before hatched. Inflaming each other's imaginations about great gains of money, and entering into a sort of intangible, impossible, competition as to who is the richer."
"People envisioning huge amounts of money, creatively—speculatively—counting their chickens before they're hatched. Stirring up each other's imaginations about big financial gains, and getting into a sort of intangible, unrealistic competition over who is richer."
"The advertising sage, philosopher, and friend: who educates 'for the bar, the pulpit, or the stage.'"
"The advertising expert, thinker, and friend: who teaches 'for the courtroom, the pulpit, or the stage.'"
"The character of the real refugee—not the conventional; the real."
"The true refugee—not the stereotype; the real thing."
"The mysterious character, or characters, interchanging confidences. 'Necessary to be very careful in that direction.'—'In what direction?'—'B'—'You don't say so. What, do you mean that C——?'—'Is aware of D. Exactly.'"[292]
"The mysterious character, or characters, exchanging secrets. 'You need to be really careful about that.'—'About what?'—'B.'—'You don't say. What, are you talking about C——?'—'Knows about D. Exactly.'" [292]
"The father and boy, as I dramatically see them. Opening with the wild dance I have in my mind."
"The dad and the boy, as I intensely envision them. Starting with the wild dance that's playing in my mind."
"The old child. That is to say, born of parents advanced in life, and observing the parents of other children to be young. Taking an old tone accordingly."
"The old child. That is to say, born to parents who are older, and noticing that the parents of other kids are young. Adopting an older demeanor as a result."
"A thoroughly sulky character—perverting everything. Making the good, bad—and the bad, good."
"A totally sulky person—twisting everything around. Turning the good into bad—and the bad into good."
"The people who lay all their sins negligences and ignorances, on Providence."
"The people who blame all their sins, mistakes, and ignorance on Fate."
"The man who marries his cook at last, after being so desperately knowing about the sex."
"The man who finally marries his cook after being so obsessed with sex."
"The swell establishment, frightfully mean and miserable in all but the 'reception rooms.' Those very showy."
"The fancy building is really harsh and miserable everywhere except in the 'reception rooms.' Those are quite flashy."
"B. tells M. what my opinion is of his work, &c. Quoting the man you have once spoken to as if he had talked a life's talk in two minutes."
"B. tells M. what I think of his work, etc. Quoting the guy you’ve talked to for just a moment as if he had shared a lifetime of wisdom in two minutes."
"A misplaced and mis-married man; always, as it were, playing hide and seek with the world; and never finding what Fortune seems to have hidden when he was born."[293]
"A lost and mismatched man, always playing hide and seek with the world and never discovering what luck seems to have hidden from him since birth."[293]
"Certain women in Africa who have lost children, carry little wooden images of children on their heads, and always put their food to the lips of those images, before tasting it themselves. This is in a part of Africa where the mortality among children (judging from the number of these little memorials) is very great."
"Some women in Africa who have lost children carry small wooden figures of children on their heads and always offer food to those figures before tasting it themselves. This is in a region of Africa where the child mortality rate (based on the number of these memorials) is very high."
Two more entries are the last which he made. "Available names" introduces a wonderful list in the exact following classes and order; as to which the reader may be left to his own memory for selection of such as found their way into the several stories from Little Dorrit to the end. The rest, not lifted into that higher notice by such favour of their creator, must remain like any other undistinguished crowd. But among them may perhaps be detected, by those who have special insight for the physiognomy of a name, some few with so great promise in them of fun and character as will make the "mute inglorious" fate which has befallen them a subject for special regret; and much ingenious speculation will probably wait upon all. Dickens has generally been thought, by the curious, to display not a few of his most characteristic traits in this particular field of invention.
Two more entries were the last he made. "Available usernames" presents a fantastic list in the exact following categories and order; readers can rely on their own memories to choose those that appeared in the various stories from Little Dorrit onward. The rest, not raised to that greater prominence by the favor of their creator, will remain like any other overlooked group. However, those with a keen eye for the personality behind a name may spot a few with such potential for humor and character that the "mute inglorious" fate they've encountered warrants special regret; and there will likely be much creative speculation surrounding all of them. Dickens is generally considered, by the curious, to reveal many of his most distinctive traits in this particular area of creativity.
First there are titles for books; and from the list subjoined were taken two for Christmas numbers and two for stories, though Nobody's Fault had ultimately to give way to Little Dorrit.
First, there are book titles; and from the attached list, two were chosen for Christmas issues and two for stories, although Nobody's Fault ultimately had to make way for Little Dorrit.
"THE LUMBER ROOM. |
SOMEONE'S LUGGAGE. |
TO BE LEFT UNTIL CALLED FOR. |
Something desired. |
Opposite ends connect. |
Not anyone's fault. |
The Grindstone. |
[294]ROKESMITH'S FORGE. |
Our Mutual Friend. |
THE ASH PILE. |
Two generations. |
Broken dishes. |
Dust. |
THE HOME OFFICE. |
THE YOUNG PERSON. |
Now or never. |
MY NEIGHBORS. |
THE CHILDREN OF THE DADS. |
NO ENTRY. |
Then comes a batch of "Christian names": Girls and Boys: which stand thus, with mention of the source from which he obtained them. These therefore can hardly be called pure invention. Some would have been reckoned too extravagant for anything but reality.
Then comes a list of "Christian names": Girls and Boys: which are presented here, along with the source from which he got them. So, these can't really be considered pure inventions. Some would have been seen as too extravagant for anything but reality.
"Girls from Privy Council Education lists.
"LELIA. |
MENELLA. |
RUBINA. |
IRIS. |
REBECCA. |
ETTY. |
REBINAH. |
SEBA. |
IRAN. |
ARAMANDA. |
Doris. |
BALZINA. |
Nice. |
GENTILLA. |
"Boys from Privy Council Education lists.
"DOCTOR. |
Homer. |
ODEN. |
BRADLEY. |
Zerubbabel. |
MAXIMILIAN. |
URBIN. |
SAMILIAS. |
Pickles. |
ORANGE. |
Feather. |
"Girls and Boys from Ditto.
To which he adds supplementary lists that appear to be his own.
To which he adds extra lists that seem to be his own.
"More Boys.
"ROBERT LADLE. |
Jolly Stick. |
BILL MARIGOLD. |
STEPHEN MARQUICK. |
JONATHAN KNOTWELL. |
[295]PHILIP BROWN DRESS. |
HENRY GHOST. |
GEORGE MUZZLE. |
WALTER ASHES. |
ZEPHANIAH FERRY (or FURY). |
WILLIAM WHY. |
ROBERT'S GOSPEL. |
THOMAS DAD. |
ROBIN SCUBBAM. |
"More Girls.
"SARAH GOLDSACKS. |
ROSETTA DUST. |
SUSAN GOLDRING. |
Catherine II. |
MATILDA RAINBIRD. |
Miriam Denial. |
SOPHIA DOOMSDAY. |
ALICE THORNEYWORK. |
Sally Gimblet. |
Verity Hawkyard. |
BIRDIE NASH. |
AMBROSINA EVENTS. |
APAULINA VERNON. |
NELTIE ASHFORD. |
And then come the mass of his "available names," which stand thus, without other introduction or comment:
And then comes the list of his "available names," which are presented like this, without any further introduction or comments:
"TOWNDLING. |
Vibe. |
Nonsense. |
TREBLE. |
CHILBY. |
SPESSIFER. |
WATER. |
WHELPFORD. |
FENNERCK. |
Gannerson. |
CHINKERBLE. |
BINTREY. |
Fledson. |
HIRLL. |
BRAYLE. |
Mullender. |
TRESLINGHAM. |
BRANKLE. |
Sitting. |
DOSTONE. |
Caylon. |
SLYANT. |
QUEEDY. |
BESSELTHUR. |
Damp. |
Grout. |
Tertius Jobber. |
AMON HEADSTON. |
STRAYSHOTT. |
HIGDEN. |
MORFIT. |
GOLDSTRAW. |
Barrel. |
INGE. |
LEAP. |
JIGGINS. |
BONES. |
Shy. |
Morning. |
TATKIN. |
Drowsy. |
Pudsey. |
PEDSEY. |
DUNCALF. |
TRICKLEBANK. |
SAPSEA. |
READYHUFF. |
DUFTY. |
Hazy. |
TWINN. |
Brownsword. |
Pear Tree. |
Suds. |
SILVERMAN. |
KIMBER. |
LAUGHLEY. |
LESSOCK. |
Tippins. |
MINNITT. |
RADLOWE. |
PRATCHET. |
MAWDETT. |
[296]WOZENHAM. |
SNOWELL. |
LOTTRUM. |
LAMMLE. |
FROZE. |
HOLBLACK. |
MULLEY. |
REDWORTH. |
REDFOOT. |
TARBOX (B). |
Tinkling. |
DUDDLE. |
Jeez. |
POWDERHILL. |
GRIM. |
SKUSE. |
TITCOOMBE. |
CRABBLE. |
SWANNOCK. |
TUZZEN. |
TWEMLOW. |
SQUAB. |
JACKMAN. |
Suggestion. |
BREMMIDGE. |
SILAS BLODGET. |
MELVIN BEAL. |
BUTTRICK. |
EDSON. |
SANLORN. |
LIGHTWORD. |
TITBULL. |
BANGHAM. |
KYLE—NYLE. |
PEMBLE. |
MAXEY. |
ROKESMITH. |
CHIVIRY. |
Wobbler. |
PEEX—SPEEX. |
GANNAWAY. |
Mrs. Flinks. |
FLINX. |
JEE |
HARDEN. |
MERDLE. |
Murder. |
TOPWASH. |
PORDAGE. |
DORRET—DORRIT. |
BOX. |
MINIFIE. |
SLINGO. |
JOAD. |
KINCH. |
MAG. |
CHELLYSON. |
BLENNAM—CL. |
Bardock. |
SNIGSWORTH. |
SWENTON. |
CASBY—Peach. |
LOWLEIGH—LOWELY. |
PIGRIN. |
YERBURY. |
PLORNISH. |
Burgundy. |
Bandy-Nandy. |
STONEBURY. |
MAGWITCH. |
MEAGLES. |
Pancakes. |
Luggage. |
PROVISION. |
STILTINGTON. |
Stilt walking. |
STILTINGSTALK. |
Stilt walking. |
LAVENDER. |
PODSNAP. |
CLARRIKER. |
COMPANY. |
STRIVER-STRYVER. |
Pumblechook. |
WANGLER. |
Genius. |
BANTINCK. |
DIBTON. |
WILFER. |
GLIBBERY. |
MULVEY. |
Horlicks. |
DOOLGE. |
Grocery Store. |
Gargery. |
WILLSHARD. |
Riderhood. |
PRATTERSTONE. |
CHINKIBLE. |
WopSell. |
Wopsle. |
Whelpington. |
Whelpford. |
GAY-VERY. |
WEGG. |
Hubble. |
Hurry. |
Kibble. |
SKIFFINS. |
Wutter. |
ETSER. |
AKERSHEM. |
The last of the Memoranda, and the last words written by Dickens in the blank paper book containing[297] them, are these. "'Then I'll give up snuff.' Brobity.—An alarming sacrifice. Mr. Brobity's snuff-box. The Pawnbroker's account of it?" What was proposed by this must be left to conjecture; but "Brobity" is the name of one of the people in his unfinished story, and the suggestion may have been meant for some incident in it. If so, it is the only passage in the volume which can be in any way connected with the piece of writing on which he was last engaged. Some names were taken for it from the lists, but there is otherwise nothing to recall Edwin Drood[298].
The final notes, and the last words written by Dickens in the blank paper book containing[297] them, are these: "'Then I'll give up snuff.' Brobity.—An alarming sacrifice. Mr. Brobity's snuff-box. The Pawnbroker's account of it?" What was suggested by this remains a mystery; however, "Brobity" is the name of a character in his unfinished story, and this suggestion might have been intended for an event in that narrative. If that’s the case, it’s the only part of the volume that can be linked to the writing he was last working on. Some names were selected from the lists for it, but there is otherwise nothing to remind us of Edwin Drood[298].
CHAPTER XIII.
THIRD SERIES OF READINGS.
1864-1867.
The sudden death of Thackeray on the Christmas eve of 1863 was a painful shock to Dickens. It would not become me to speak, when he has himself spoken, of his relations with so great a writer and so old a friend.
The sudden death of Thackeray on Christmas Eve in 1863 was a painful shock to Dickens. I shouldn't say much when he has already expressed his feelings about his relationship with such a great writer and old friend.
"I saw him first, nearly twenty-eight years ago, when he proposed to become the illustrator of my earliest book. I saw him last,[253] shortly before Christmas, at the[299] Athenæum Club, when he told me that he had been in bed three days . . . and that he had it in his mind to try a new remedy which he laughingly described. He was cheerful, and looked very bright. In the night of that day week, he died. The long interval between these two periods is marked in my remembrance of him by many occasions when he was extremely humorous, when he was irresistibly extravagant, when he was softened and serious, when he was charming with children. . . . No one can be surer than I, of the greatness and goodness of his heart. . . . In no place should I take it upon myself at this time to discourse of his books, of his refined knowledge of character, of his subtle acquaintance with the weaknesses of human nature, of his delightful playfulness as an essayist, of his quaint and touching ballads, of his mastery over the English language. . . . But before me lies all that he had written of his latest story . . . and the pain I have felt in perusing it has not been deeper than the conviction that he was in the healthiest vigour of his powers when he worked on this last labour. . . . The last words he corrected in print were 'And my heart throbbed with an exquisite bliss.' God grant that on that Christmas Eve when he laid his head back on his pillow and threw up his arms as he had been wont to do when very weary, some consciousness of duty done, and of Christian hope throughout[300] life humbly cherished, may have caused his own heart so to throb, when he passed away to his Redeemer's rest. He was found peacefully lying as above described, composed, undisturbed, and to all appearance asleep."
"I first saw him almost twenty-eight years ago when he offered to be the illustrator for my very first book. The last time I saw him was shortly before Christmas at the Athenæum Club, where he mentioned that he had been in bed for three days… and that he was thinking about trying a new remedy that he described with a laugh. He was cheerful and looked very lively. That night a week later, he passed away. The long time between these two moments is filled in my memory with many instances of his great humor, his irresistible extravagance, his serious and tender side, and his charm with children. No one could be more certain than I am about the greatness and goodness of his heart. At this moment, it wouldn’t be right for me to talk about his books, his refined understanding of character, his subtle knowledge of human weaknesses, his delightful playfulness as an essayist, his unique and touching ballads, or his mastery of the English language. But I have everything he wrote for his latest story in front of me, and the pain I felt reading it was only overshadowed by my belief that he was in full health and strength when he worked on this last piece. The final words he corrected in print were ‘And my heart throbbed with an exquisite bliss.’ I hope that on that Christmas Eve when he rested his head back on his pillow and raised his arms as he had done when very tired, he may have felt some sense of duty fulfilled and a humble Christian hope throughout his life, which may have caused his heart to throb as he passed on to his Redeemer's rest. He was found peacefully lying as described, composed, undisturbed, and appearing to be asleep."
Other griefs were with Dickens at this time, and close upon them came the too certain evidence that his own health was yielding to the overstrain which had been placed upon it by the occurrences and anxieties of the few preceding years. His mother, whose infirm health had been tending for more than two years to the close, died in September 1863; and on his own birthday in the following February he had tidings of the death of his second son Walter, on the last day of the old year in the officers' hospital at Calcutta; to which he had been sent up invalided from his station, on his way home. He was a lieutenant in the 26th Native Infantry regiment, and had been doing duty with the 42nd Highlanders. In 1853 his father had thus written to the youth's godfather, Walter Savage Landor: "Walter is a very good boy, and comes home from school with honorable commendation and a prize into the bargain. He never gets into trouble, for he is a great favourite with the whole house and one of the most amiable boys in the boy-world. He comes out on birthdays in a blaze of shirt pin." The pin was a present from Landor; to whom three years later, when the boy had obtained his cadetship through the kindness of Miss Coutts, Dickens wrote again. "Walter has done extremely well at school; has brought home a prize in triumph; and will be eligible to 'go up' for his India examination soon after next Easter. Having a direct appointment he will probably be sent out soon[301] after he has passed, and so will fall into that strange life 'up the country' before he well knows he is alive, or what life is—which indeed seems to be rather an advanced state of knowledge." If he had lived another month he would have reached his twenty-third year, and perhaps not then the advanced state of knowledge his father speaks of. But, never forfeiting his claim to those kindly paternal words, he had the goodness and simplicity of boyhood to the last.
Other troubles weighed on Dickens during this time, and soon came the undeniable sign that his health was suffering due to the strain from the events and worries of the past few years. His mother, whose poor health had been declining for more than two years, passed away in September 1863; and on his birthday the following February, he received news about the death of his second son Walter, who had died on the last day of the previous year in an officers' hospital in Calcutta, where he had been sent after being injured on his way home. Walter was a lieutenant in the 26th Native Infantry regiment and had been serving with the 42nd Highlanders. In 1853, his father had written to the boy’s godfather, Walter Savage Landor: "Walter is a very good boy, and comes home from school with honorable commendation and a prize to his name. He never gets into trouble, as he is a favorite with everyone and one of the most likable boys around. He stands out on birthdays in a blaze of shirt pin." The pin was a gift from Landor; three years later, after Walter secured his cadetship thanks to Miss Coutts, Dickens wrote again. "Walter has done extremely well at school; he’s brought home a prize in triumph and will soon be eligible to take his India examination right after Easter. With a direct appointment, he'll probably be sent out shortly after he passes, and so he will jump into that strange life 'up the country' before he even realizes he’s alive or what life is—which seems to require quite a bit of knowledge." If he had lived another month, he would have turned twenty-three, and perhaps not even then would he have reached the advanced state of knowledge his father referred to. But, consistently maintaining his claim to those affectionate paternal words, he kept the goodness and simplicity of boyhood until the end.
Dickens had at this time begun his last story in twenty numbers, and my next chapter will show through what unwonted troubles, in this and the following year, he had to fight his way. What otherwise during its progress chiefly interested him, was the enterprise of Mr. Fechter at the Lyceum, of which he had become the lessee; and Dickens was moved to this quite as much by generous sympathy with the difficulties of such a position to an artist who was not an Englishman, as by genuine admiration of Mr. Fechter's acting. He became his helper in disputes, adviser on literary points, referee in matters of management; and for some years no face was more familiar than the French comedian's at Gadshill or in the office of his journal. But theatres and their affairs are things of a season, and even Dickens's whim and humour will not revive for us any interest in these. No bad example, however, of the difficulties in which a French actor may find himself with English playwrights, will appear in a few amusing words from one of his letters about a piece played at the Princess's before the Lyceum management was taken in hand.
Dickens had at this time started his last story in twenty installments, and my next chapter will reveal the unusual struggles he faced during this and the following year. What mainly captured his interest during this period was Mr. Fechter's venture at the Lyceum, which he had taken over as the leaseholder. Dickens was motivated by both a genuine sympathy for the challenges faced by an artist who wasn't English and a true admiration for Mr. Fechter's performances. He became a supporter in disputes, an advisor on literary matters, and a referee in management issues; for several years, no face was more familiar than the French actor's at Gadshill or in the office of his journal. But theaters and their affairs are transient, and even Dickens's whims and humor can't spark any lasting interest for us here. However, a notable illustration of the challenges a French actor may encounter with English playwrights can be found in a few amusing lines from one of his letters about a production that was staged at the Princess's before the Lyceum management took over.
"I have been cautioning Fechter about the play[302] whereof he gave the plot and scenes to B; and out of which I have struck some enormities, my account of which will (I think) amuse you. It has one of the best first acts I ever saw; but if he can do much with the last two, not to say three, there are resources in his art that I know nothing about. When I went over the play this day week, he was at least 20 minutes, in a boat, in the last scene, discussing with another gentleman (also in the boat) whether he should kill him or not; after which the gentleman dived overboard and swam for it. Also, in the most important and dangerous parts of the play, there was a young person of the name of Pickles who was constantly being mentioned by name, in conjunction with the powers of light or darkness; as, 'Great Heaven! Pickles?'—'By Hell, 'tis Pickles!'—'Pickles? a thousand Devils!'—'Distraction! Pickles?'"[254]
"I've been warning Fechter about the play[302] that he gave the plot and scenes to B; I've cut out some awkward parts, which I think you'll find amusing. It has one of the best first acts I've ever seen; but if he can manage much with the last two, not to mention three, there are skills in his craft that I know nothing about. When I reviewed the play last week, he spent at least 20 minutes in a boat, in the last scene, debating with another guy (also in the boat) whether he should kill him or not; after that, the guy jumped overboard and swam away. Also, in the most crucial and dramatic moments of the play, there was a young person named Pickles who kept coming up by name, along with references to light or darkness; like, 'Great Heaven! Pickles?'—'By Hell, it's Pickles!'—'Pickles? a thousand Devils!'—'Distraction! Pickles?'"[254]
The old year ended and the new one opened sadly enough. The death of Leech in November affected Dickens very much,[255] and a severe attack of illness in February put a broad mark between his past life and what remained to him of the future. The lameness now began in his left foot which never afterwards wholly left him, which was attended by great suffering, and which baffled experienced physicians. He had[304] persisted in his ordinary exercise during heavy snow-storms, and to the last he had the fancy that his illness was merely local. But that this was an error is now certain; and it is more than probable that if the nervous danger and disturbance it implied had been correctly appreciated at the time, its warning might have been of priceless value to Dickens. Unhappily he never thought of husbanding his strength except for the purpose of making fresh demands upon it, and it was for this he took a brief holiday in France during the summer. "Before I went away," he wrote to his daughter, "I had certainly worked myself into a damaged state. But the moment I got away, I began, thank God, to get well. I hope to profit by this experience, and to make future dashes from my desk before I want them." At his return he was in the terrible railway accident at Staplehurst, on a day[256] which proved afterwards more fatal to him; and it was with shaken nerves but unsubdued energy he resumed the labour to be presently described. His foot troubled him more or less throughout the autumn;[257] he was beset by nervous[305] apprehensions which the accident had caused to himself, not lessened by his generous anxiety to assuage the severer sufferings inflicted by it on others;[258] and that he should nevertheless have determined, on the close of his book, to undertake a series of readings involving greater strain and fatigue than any hitherto, was a startling circumstance. He had perhaps become conscious, without owning it even to himself, that for exertion of this kind the time left him was short; but, whatever pressed him on, his task of the next three years, self-imposed, was to make the most money in the shortest time without any regard to the physical labour to be undergone. The very letter announcing his new engagement shows how entirely unfit he was to enter upon it.
The old year ended and the new one began in a rather sad way. The death of Leech in November deeply affected Dickens,[255] and a serious illness in February created a clear divide between his past and what was left of his future. He started to experience lameness in his left foot, which he would never fully overcome; it caused him a lot of pain and perplexed experienced doctors. He[304] continued his usual exercise routine even during heavy snowstorms, and until the end, he believed that his illness was just a local issue. However, it's now clear that this belief was mistaken, and it's very likely that if the dangers and disturbances it presented had been recognized at the time, the warning could have been invaluable for Dickens. Unfortunately, he never considered conserving his strength for anything other than pushing himself harder, which is why he took a short vacation in France that summer. "Before I went away," he wrote to his daughter, "I had definitely worn myself out. But as soon as I left, I began, thank God, to feel better. I hope to learn from this experience and take breaks from my work before I need them." Upon his return, he was involved in the awful railway accident at Staplehurst, on a day[256] that ultimately proved more detrimental for him; he resumed his work with shaken nerves but unwavering energy. His foot continued to trouble him throughout the autumn;[257] he dealt with nervous anxiety caused by the accident, which wasn’t made any easier by his deep concern for those who suffered more severely because of it;[258] and yet, he still decided, after finishing his book, to undertake a series of readings that involved more strain and fatigue than he had ever experienced before, which was shocking. He may have realized, without admitting it even to himself, that his time to exert himself in this way was limited; but whatever compelled him, his self-imposed task over the next three years was to earn as much money as possible in the shortest time without regard for the physical toll it would take. The very letter announcing his new engagement shows just how unfit he was to pursue it.
"For some time," he wrote at the end of February 1866, "I have been very unwell. F. B. wrote me word that with such a pulse as I described, an examination[306] of the heart was absolutely necessary. 'Want of muscular power in the heart,' B said. 'Only remarkable irritability of the heart,' said Doctor Brinton of Brook-street, who had been called in to consultation. I was not disconcerted; for I knew well beforehand that the effect could not possibly be without the one cause at the bottom of it, of some degeneration of some function of the heart. Of course I am not so foolish as to suppose that all my work can have been achieved without some penalty, and I have noticed for some time a decided change in my buoyancy and hopefulness—in other words, in my usual 'tone.' But tonics have already brought me round. So I have accepted an offer, from Chappells of Bond-street, of £50 a night for thirty nights to read 'in England, Ireland, Scotland, or Paris;' they undertaking all the business, paying all personal expenses, travelling and otherwise, of myself, John" (his office servant), "and my gasman; and making what they can of it. I begin, I believe, in Liverpool on the Thursday in Easter week, and then come to London. I am going to read at Cheltenham (on my own account) on the 23rd and 24th of this month, staying with Macready of course."
"For some time," he wrote at the end of February 1866, "I've been feeling very unwell. F. B. informed me that with the pulse I described, a heart examination[306] was absolutely necessary. 'There's a lack of muscular power in the heart,' B said. 'There's just significant irritability of the heart,' said Doctor Brinton from Brook Street, who was called in for a consultation. I wasn't worried; I knew beforehand that the symptoms couldn’t be without some underlying issue with the heart's function. Of course, I'm not naive enough to think that all my work could come without some consequence, and I've noticed for a while a noticeable change in my energy and optimism—in other words, in my usual 'mood.' But tonics have already helped me recover. So I've accepted an offer from Chappells of Bond Street for £50 a night for thirty nights to perform 'in England, Ireland, Scotland, or Paris;' they’ll handle all the arrangements, cover all my personal expenses, both travel and otherwise, for me, John" (his office servant), "and my gasman; and they'll make whatever they can out of it. I believe I'm starting in Liverpool on the Thursday of Easter week, and then I'm heading to London. I'm also going to perform in Cheltenham (on my own) on the 23rd and 24th of this month, staying with Macready, of course."
The arrangement of this series of Readings differed from those of its predecessors in relieving Dickens from every anxiety except of the reading itself; but, by such rapid and repeated change of nights at distant places as kept him almost wholly in a railway carriage when not at the reading-desk or in bed, it added enormously to the physical fatigue. He would read at St. James's Hall in London one night, and at Bradford[307] the next. He would read in Edinburgh, go on to Glasgow and to Aberdeen, then come back to Glasgow, read again in Edinburgh, strike off to Manchester, come back to St. James's Hall once more, and begin the same round again. It was labour that must in time have broken down the strongest man, and what Dickens was when he assumed it we have seen.
The schedule for this series of readings was different from previous ones because it took away all of Dickens's worries except for the reading itself. However, the constant and quick travel to far-off places kept him mostly in a train carriage when he wasn't at the reading desk or in bed, which added a lot to his physical exhaustion. He would read at St. James's Hall in London one night, and then be in Bradford the next. After that, he would read in Edinburgh, move on to Glasgow and Aberdeen, then return to Glasgow, read again in Edinburgh, head to Manchester, come back to St. James's Hall again, and start the whole cycle over. It was work that would eventually wear down even the strongest person, and we know what Dickens was like when he took it on.
He did not himself admit a shadow of misgiving. "As to the readings" (11th of March), "all I have to do is, to take in my book and read, at the appointed place and hour, and come out again. All the business of every kind, is done by Chappells. They take John and my other man, merely for my convenience. I have no more to do with any detail whatever, than you have. They transact all the business at their own cost, and on their own responsibility. I think they are disposed to do it in a very good spirit, because, whereas the original proposition was for thirty readings 'in England, Ireland, Scotland, or Paris,' they wrote out their agreement 'in London, the Provinces, or elsewhere, as you and we may agree.' For this they pay £1500 in three sums; £500 on beginning, £500 on the fifteenth Reading, £500 at the close. Every charge of every kind, they pay besides. I rely for mere curiosity on Doctor Marigold (I am going to begin with him in Liverpool, and at St. James's Hall). I have got him up with immense pains, and should like to give you a notion what I am going to do with him."
He didn't express any doubt himself. "As for the readings" (March 11), "all I need to do is to take my book and read at the scheduled time and place, then come out again. Chappells handles all the business. They brought in John and my other guy just for my convenience. I have no more involvement in the details than you do. They manage all the business at their own expense and on their own terms. I believe they’re doing it with a good attitude because, while the original plan was for thirty readings 'in England, Ireland, Scotland, or Paris,' they drafted their agreement 'in London, the Provinces, or elsewhere, as you and we may agree.' For this, they pay £1500 in three installments: £500 at the start, £500 after the fifteenth reading, and £500 at the end. They also cover any other expenses. I’m really looking forward to Doctor Marigold (I’m going to start with him in Liverpool and at St. James's Hall). I’ve put in a lot of effort to prepare him and would like to give you an idea of what I plan to do with him."
The success everywhere went far beyond even the former successes. A single night at Manchester, when eight hundred stalls were let, two thousand five hundred and sixty-five people admitted, and the receipts[308] amounted to more than three hundred pounds, was followed in nearly the same proportion by all the greater towns; and on the 20th of April the outlay for the entire venture was paid, leaving all that remained, to the middle of the month of June, sheer profit. "I came back last Sunday," he wrote on the 30th of May, "with my last country piece of work for this time done. Everywhere the success has been the same. St. James's Hall last night was quite a splendid spectacle. Two more Tuesdays there, and I shall retire into private life. I have only been able to get to Gadshill once since I left it, and that was the day before yesterday."
The success everywhere surpassed even the previous achievements. One night in Manchester, when eight hundred stalls were sold, two thousand five hundred sixty-five people attended, and the earnings[308] totaled over three hundred pounds, was mirrored in almost all the larger towns; and by April 20th, the expenses for the entire venture were covered, leaving everything from then until mid-June as pure profit. "I got back last Sunday," he wrote on May 30th, "with my last country project for now completed. The success has been consistent everywhere. St. James's Hall last night was quite a spectacular event. After two more Tuesdays there, I’ll step back into private life. I've only managed to get to Gadshill once since I left, and that was the day before yesterday."
One memorable evening he had passed at my house in the interval, when he saw Mrs. Carlyle for the last time. Her sudden death followed shortly after, and near the close of April he had thus written to me from Liverpool. "It was a terrible shock to me, and poor dear Carlyle has been in my mind ever since. How often I have thought of the unfinished novel. No one now to finish it. None of the writing women come near her at all." This was an allusion to what had passed at their meeting. It was on the second of April, the day when Mr. Carlyle had delivered his inaugural address as Lord Rector of Edinburgh University, and a couple of ardent words from Professor Tyndall had told her of the triumph just before dinner. She came to us flourishing the telegram in her hand, and the radiance of her enjoyment of it was upon her all the night. Among other things she gave Dickens the subject for a novel, from what she had herself observed at the outside of a house in her street; of which the[309] various incidents were drawn from the condition of its blinds and curtains, the costumes visible at its windows, the cabs at its door, its visitors admitted or rejected, its articles of furniture delivered or carried away; and the subtle serious humour of it all, the truth in trifling bits of character, and the gradual progress into a half-romantic interest, had enchanted the skilled novelist. She was well into the second volume of her small romance before she left, being as far as her observation then had taken her; but in a few days exciting incidents were expected, the denouement could not be far off, and Dickens was to have it when they met again. Yet it was to something far other than this amusing little fancy his thoughts had carried him, when he wrote of no one being capable to finish what she might have begun. In greater things this was still more true. No one could doubt it who had come within the fascinating influence of that sweet and noble nature. With some of the highest gifts of intellect, and the charm of a most varied knowledge of books and things, there was something "beyond, beyond." No one who knew Mrs. Carlyle could replace her loss when she had passed away.
One memorable evening, he spent at my house during the time when he saw Mrs. Carlyle for the last time. Her sudden death came shortly after, and near the end of April, he wrote to me from Liverpool. "It was a terrible shock for me, and poor dear Carlyle has been on my mind ever since. How often I've thought about the unfinished novel. No one to finish it now. None of the women writers are close to her at all." This referred to what happened during their meeting. It was on April 2nd, the day Mr. Carlyle gave his inaugural speech as Lord Rector of Edinburgh University, and a few heartfelt words from Professor Tyndall had let her know about the triumph just before dinner. She came to us waving the telegram in her hand, and her joy was evident all night. Among other things, she gave Dickens the idea for a novel based on what she had observed outside a house in her street; the various incidents were drawn from the state of its blinds and curtains, the costumes visible in its windows, the cabs at its door, the visitors who were admitted or turned away, and the furniture that was delivered or taken away. The subtle, serious humor of it all, the truth in tiny bits of character, and the gradual development into a half-romantic interest had captivated the talented novelist. She was well into the second volume of her small romance before she left, as far as her observations had taken her; but in a few days, exciting events were expected, the climax couldn't be far off, and Dickens was supposed to have it when they met again. Still, when he wrote about no one being able to finish what she might have started, his thoughts had taken him to something much deeper than this amusing little idea. In greater matters, this was even more true. No one could doubt that who had experienced the captivating influence of that sweet and noble nature. With some of the greatest intellectual gifts and the charm of a vast knowledge of books and things, there was something “beyond, beyond.” No one who knew Mrs. Carlyle could fill the void left when she was gone.
The same letter which told of his uninterrupted success to the last, told me also that he had a heavy cold upon him and was "very tired and depressed." Some weeks before the first batch of readings closed, Messrs. Chappell had already tempted him with an offer for fifty more nights to begin at Christmas, for which he meant, as he then said, to ask them seventy pounds a night. "It would be unreasonable to ask anything now on the ground of the extent of the late success,[310] but I am bound to look to myself for the future. The Chappells are speculators, though of the worthiest and most honourable kind. They make some bad speculations, and have made a very good one in this case, and will set this against those. I told them when we agreed: 'I offer these thirty Readings to you at fifty pounds a night, because I know perfectly well beforehand that no one in your business has the least idea of their real worth, and I wish to prove it.' The sum taken is £4720." The result of the fresh negotiation, though not completed until the beginning of August, may be at once described. "Chappell instantly accepts my proposal of forty nights at sixty pounds a night, and every conceivable and inconceivable expense paid. To make an even sum, I have made it forty-two nights for £2500. So I shall now try to discover a Christmas number" (he means the subject for one), "and shall, please Heaven, be quit of the whole series of readings so as to get to work on a new story for the new series of All the Year Round early in the spring. The readings begin probably with the New Year." These were fair designs, but the fairest are the sport of circumstance, and though the subject for Christmas was found, the new series of All the Year Round never had a new story from its founder. With whatever consequence to himself, the strong tide of the Readings was to sweep on to its full. The American war had ceased, and the first renewed offers from the States had been made and rejected. Hovering over all, too, were other sterner dispositions. "I think," he wrote in September, "there is some strange influence in the atmosphere. Twice last week I was[311] seized in a most distressing manner—apparently in the heart; but, I am persuaded, only in the nervous system."
The same letter that shared his ongoing success up until the end also mentioned that he had a bad cold and was "very tired and depressed." A few weeks before the initial set of readings wrapped up, Mr. Chappell had already tempted him with an offer for fifty more nights starting at Christmas, for which he planned to ask seventy pounds per night. "It wouldn't be fair to ask for more now based on the recent success,[310] but I need to consider my future. The Chappells are speculators, though the most reputable and honorable kind. They make some poor investments, but they’ve made a very good one in this case, which they'll offset against the others. I told them when we agreed: 'I’m offering these thirty readings at fifty pounds a night because I know no one in your business understands their true value, and I want to prove it.' The total comes to £4720." The outcome of the new negotiation, which wasn't finalized until early August, can be described right away. "Chappell immediately agrees to my offer of forty nights at sixty pounds a night, plus every conceivable and inconceivable expense covered. To round it out, I’ve adjusted it to forty-two nights for £2500. So now I’ll try to come up with a Christmas topic" (he means a subject for one), "and, God willing, I’ll be done with the entire series of readings and can start working on a new story for the new series of All the Year Round early in the spring. The readings will probably kick off with the New Year." These were good plans, but even the best plans are subject to change, and while the Christmas topic was found, the new series of All the Year Round never got a new story from its founder. Regardless of the impact on himself, the powerful momentum of the readings would carry on. The American war had ended, and the first renewed offers from the States had been made and turned down. Looming over everything were some more serious concerns. "I feel," he wrote in September, "that there’s some strange influence in the air. Twice last week I was[311] seized in a really distressing way—seemingly in the heart; but I’m convinced, it's just my nervous system."
In the midst of his ovations such checks had not been wanting. "The police reported officially," he wrote to his daughter from Liverpool on the 14th of April, "that three thousand people were turned away from the hall last night. . . . Except that I can not sleep, I really think myself in very much better training than I had anticipated. A dozen oysters and a little champagne between the parts every night, seem to constitute the best restorative I have ever yet tried." "Such a prodigious demonstration last night at Manchester," he wrote to the same correspondent twelve days later, "that I was obliged (contrary to my principle in such cases) to go back. I am very tired to-day; for it would be of itself very hard work in that immense place, if there were not to be added eighty miles of railway and late hours to boot." "It has been very heavy work," he wrote to his sister-in-law on the 11th of May from Clifton, "getting up at 6.30 each morning after a heavy night, and I am not at all well to-day. We had a tremendous hall at Birmingham last night, £230 odd, 2100 people; and I made a most ridiculous mistake. Had Nickleby on my list to finish with, instead of Trial. Read Nickleby with great go, and the people remained. Went back again at 10 o'clock, and explained the accident: but said if they liked I would give them the Trial. They did like;—and I had another half hour of it, in that enormous place. . . . I have so severe a pain in the ball of my left eye that it makes it hard for me to do anything after 100[312] miles shaking since breakfast. My cold is no better, nor my hand either." It was his left eye, it will be noted, as it was his left foot and hand; the irritability or faintness of heart was also of course on the left side; and it was on the same left side he felt most of the effect of the railway accident.
In the midst of his applause, there were indeed checks. "The police officially reported," he wrote to his daughter from Liverpool on April 14th, "that three thousand people were turned away from the hall last night. ... Except that I can not sleep, I really feel I'm in much better shape than I thought. A dozen oysters and a little champagne between the acts every night seem to be the best remedy I’ve ever tried." "What a huge turnout last night in Manchester," he wrote to the same correspondent twelve days later, "that I had to go back, which goes against my usual principle. I'm really tired today; it would be hard work on its own in that massive place, not to mention the extra eighty miles of train travel and late hours." "It has been really tough," he wrote to his sister-in-law on May 11th from Clifton, "getting up at 6:30 every morning after a heavy night, and I'm not feeling well today. We had an incredible turnout in Birmingham last night, over £230, 2100 people; and I made a ridiculous mistake. I had Nickleby on my list to end with instead of Trial. I read Nickleby with a lot of energy, and the audience stayed. I went back at 10 o'clock and explained the mix-up: I told them I would give them the Trial if they wanted it. They did want it;—so I had another half hour of it in that huge place. ... I have such severe pain in the ball of my left eye that it makes it hard to do anything after 100[312] miles of shaking since breakfast. My cold hasn’t improved, nor has my hand." It should be noted that it was his left eye, just like his left foot and hand; the irritability or faintness of heart was also of course on the left side; it was the same left side where he felt most of the effects from the railway accident.
Everything was done to make easier the labour of travel, but nothing could materially abate either the absolute physical exhaustion, or the nervous strain. "We arrived here," he wrote from Aberdeen (16th of May), "safe and sound between 3 and 4 this morning. There was a compartment for the men, and a charming room for ourselves furnished with sofas and easy chairs. We had also a pantry and washing-stand. This carriage is to go about with us." Two days later he wrote from Glasgow: "We halted at Perth yesterday, and got a lovely walk there. Until then I had been in a condition the reverse of flourishing; half strangled with my cold, and dyspeptically gloomy and dull; but, as I feel much more like myself this morning, we are going to get some fresh air aboard a steamer on the Clyde." The last letter during his country travel was from Portsmouth on the 24th of May, and contained these words: "You need have no fear about America." The readings closed in June.
Everything was done to make travel easier, but nothing could really lessen the intense physical exhaustion or the nervous strain. "We arrived here," he wrote from Aberdeen (May 16th), "safe and sound between 3 and 4 this morning. There was a compartment for the men, and a lovely room for us furnished with sofas and easy chairs. We also had a pantry and a washing stand. This carriage will travel with us." Two days later, he wrote from Glasgow: "We stopped in Perth yesterday and had a lovely walk there. Before that, I hadn’t been doing well at all; I felt half-choked with my cold, and was gloomy and dull. But since I feel much more like myself this morning, we're going to get some fresh air on a steamer on the Clyde." The last letter during his country travel was from Portsmouth on May 24th, and it included these words: "You don't need to worry about America." The readings ended in June.
The readings of the new year began with even increased enthusiasm, but not otherwise with happier omen. Here was his first outline of plan: "I start on Wednesday afternoon (the 15th of January) for Liverpool, and then go on to Chester, Derby, Leicester, and Wolverhampton. On Tuesday the 29th I read in London again, and in February I read at Manchester and[313] then go on into Scotland." From Liverpool he wrote on the 21st: "The enthusiasm has been unbounded. On Friday night I quite astonished myself; but I was taken so faint afterwards that they laid me on a sofa, at the hall for half an hour. I attribute it to my distressing inability to sleep at night, and to nothing worse. Everything is made as easy to me as it possibly can be. Dolby would do anything to lighten the work, and does everything." The weather was sorely against him. "At Chester," he wrote on the 24th from Birmingham, "we read in a snow-storm and a fall of ice. I think it was the worst weather I ever saw. . . . At Wolverhampton last night the thaw had thoroughly set in, and it rained furiously, and I was again heavily beaten. We came on here after the reading (it is only a ride of forty miles), and it was as much as I could do to hold out the journey. But I was not faint, as at Liverpool. I was only exhausted." Five days later he had returned for his Reading in London, and thus replied to a summons to dine with Macready at my house: "I am very tired; cannot sleep; have been severely shaken on an atrocious railway; read to-night, and have to read at Leeds on Thursday. But I have settled with Dolby to put off our going to Leeds on Wednesday, in the hope of coming to dine with you, and seeing our dear old friend. I say 'in the hope,' because if I should be a little more used-up to-morrow than I am to-day, I should be constrained, in spite of myself, to take to the sofa and stick there."
The readings for the new year kicked off with even more excitement, but not with any happier signs. Here’s his initial plan: "I leave on Wednesday afternoon (January 15th) for Liverpool, then continue on to Chester, Derby, Leicester, and Wolverhampton. On Tuesday the 29th, I’ll be reading in London again, and in February, I’ll read in Manchester and[313] then head up to Scotland." From Liverpool, he wrote on the 21st: "The enthusiasm has been overwhelming. On Friday night, I really surprised myself; but afterwards, I felt so faint that they had to put me on a sofa in the hall for half an hour. I blame it on my frustrating inability to sleep at night, nothing worse. Everything is made as easy for me as it can possibly be. Dolby would do anything to lighten the load, and does everything." The weather was really against him. "At Chester," he wrote on the 24th from Birmingham, "we read in a snowstorm and icy conditions. I think it was the worst weather I’ve ever experienced. . . . At Wolverhampton last night, the thaw had set in, and it was pouring rain, and I was again completely worn out. We traveled here after the reading (it’s only a 40-mile ride), and I could barely make it through the trip. But I wasn’t faint like I was in Liverpool. I was just exhausted." Five days later, he returned for his reading in London and replied to an invitation to dinner at my place with Macready: "I’m very tired; can’t sleep; I’ve been really shaken up on a terrible railway; I read tonight, and I have to read in Leeds on Thursday. But I’ve arranged with Dolby to postpone our trip to Leeds on Wednesday, hoping to come for dinner with you and see our dear old friend. I say 'hoping' because if I’m feeling a little more worn out tomorrow than I am today, I’ll have no choice but to hit the sofa and stay there."
On the 15th of February he wrote to his sister-in-law from Liverpool that they had had "an enormous turnaway" the previous night. "The day has been very[314] fine, and I have turned it to the wholesomest account by walking on the sands at New Brighton all the morning. I am not quite right within, but believe it to be an effect of the railway shaking. There is no doubt of the fact that, after the Staplehurst experience, it tells more and more (railway shaking, that is) instead of, as one might have expected, less and less." The last remark is a strange one, from a man of his sagacity; but it was part of the too-willing self-deception which he practised, to justify him in his professed belief that these continued excesses of labour and excitement were really doing him no harm. The day after that last letter he pushed on to Scotland, and on the 17th wrote to his daughter from Glasgow. The closing night at Manchester had been enormous. "They cheered to that extent after it was over that I was obliged to huddle on my clothes (for I was undressing to prepare for the journey) and go back again. After so heavy a week, it was rather stiff to start on this long journey at a quarter to two in the morning; but I got more sleep than I ever got in a railway-carriage before. . . . I have, as I had in the last series of readings, a curious feeling of soreness all round the body—which I suppose to arise from the great exertion of voice . . ." Two days later he wrote to his sister-in-law from the Bridge of Allan, which he had reached from Glasgow that morning. "Yesterday I was so unwell with an internal malady that occasionally at long intervals troubles me a little, and it was attended with the sudden loss of so much blood, that I wrote to F. B. from whom I shall doubtless hear to-morrow. . . . I felt it a little more exertion to read, afterwards, and I passed a sleepless[315] night after that again; but otherwise I am in good force and spirits to-day: I may say, in the best force. . . . The quiet of this little place is sure to do me good." He rallied again from this attack, and, though he still complained of sleeplessness, wrote cheerfully from Glasgow on the 21st, describing himself indeed as confined to his room, but only because "in close hiding from a local poet who has christened his infant son in my name, and consequently haunts the building." On getting back to Edinburgh he wrote to me, with intimation that many troubles had beset him; but that the pleasure of his audiences, and the providence and forethought of Messrs. Chappell, had borne him through. "Everything is done for me with the utmost liberality and consideration. Every want I can have on these journeys is anticipated, and not the faintest spark of the tradesman spirit ever peeps out. I have three men in constant attendance on me; besides Dolby, who is an agreeable companion, an excellent manager, and a good fellow."
On February 15th, he wrote to his sister-in-law from Liverpool, mentioning that they had faced "an enormous turnaway" the night before. "The day has been very [314] nice, and I've made the most of it by walking on the beach at New Brighton all morning. I'm not feeling quite right, but I think it’s just a result of the train's vibrations. There’s no doubt that, after the Staplehurst incident, the shaking really affects me more instead of, as one might expect, less." This last comment is unusual for someone as perceptive as he was; however, it reflected his tendency towards self-deception, convincing himself that these ongoing demands of work and excitement weren’t harming him. The day after that letter, he traveled on to Scotland, writing to his daughter from Glasgow on the 17th. The last night in Manchester had been incredible. "The cheers were so loud after it was over that I had to throw on my clothes quickly (since I was getting undressed to prepare for the trip) and go back out. After such a hectic week, it was rather tough to set off on this long journey at quarter to two in the morning, but I managed to sleep more than I ever have in a train carriage before. I have, as I had during the last series of readings, a strange soreness all over my body, which I guess comes from the intense use of my voice..." Two days later, he wrote to his sister-in-law from Bridge of Allan, where he had arrived from Glasgow that morning. "Yesterday, I felt quite unwell with a recurring internal issue that occasionally bothers me, along with a sudden loss of quite a bit of blood. I wrote to F. B., and I expect to hear back from him tomorrow... I found it a bit more effort to read afterwards, and I had another sleepless night; but otherwise, I feel good and in high spirits today—indeed, in the best spirits... The calm of this small town is sure to help." He recovered from this setback and, although he still complained about sleeplessness, wrote cheerfully from Glasgow on the 21st, describing himself as confined to his room, but only because "I’m hiding from a local poet who named his newborn son after me and is consequently haunting the building." When he got back to Edinburgh, he wrote to me, mentioning that he had faced many difficulties; however, the enjoyment of his audiences and the kindness and foresight of Messrs. Chappell had helped him through. "Everything is taken care of for me with the utmost generosity and thought. Every need I might have on these trips is anticipated, and not the slightest hint of a mercenary attitude ever shows. I have three men constantly attending to me, in addition to Dolby, who is a pleasant companion, an excellent manager, and a good guy."
On the 4th of March he wrote from Newcastle: "The readings have made an immense effect in this place, and it is remarkable that although the people are individually rough, collectively they are an unusually tender and sympathetic audience; while their comic perception is quite up to the high London standard. The atmosphere is so very heavy that yesterday we escaped to Tynemouth for a two hours' sea walk. There was a high north wind blowing, and a magnificent sea running. Large vessels were being towed in and out over the stormy bar, with prodigious waves breaking on it; and, spanning the restless uproar of[316] the waters, was a quiet rainbow of transcendent beauty. The scene was quite wonderful. We were in the full enjoyment of it when a heavy sea caught us, knocked us over, and in a moment drenched us and filled even our pockets. We had nothing for it but to shake ourselves together (like Dr. Marigold), and dry ourselves as well as we could by hard walking in the wind and sunshine. But we were wet through for all that, when we came back here to dinner after half-an-hour's railway drive. I am wonderfully well, and quite fresh and strong." Three days later he was at Leeds; from which he was to work himself round through the most important neighbouring places to another reading in London, before again visiting Ireland.
On March 4th, he wrote from Newcastle: "The readings have made a huge impact here, and it's interesting that while the people seem rough individually, as a group they are an unusually kind and understanding audience; their sense of humor is on par with the high London standard. The atmosphere is so heavy that yesterday we escaped to Tynemouth for a two-hour walk by the sea. A strong north wind was blowing, and the waves were incredible. Large ships were being towed in and out over the stormy bar, with massive waves crashing against it; and spanning the chaotic waters was a beautiful, serene rainbow. The view was truly amazing. We were fully enjoying it when a big wave hit us, knocked us over, and drenched us, even filling our pockets. All we could do was shake ourselves off (like Dr. Marigold) and try to dry off by brisk walking in the wind and sunshine. But we were still completely soaked when we returned here for dinner after a half-hour train ride. I'm feeling great—quite fresh and strong." Three days later, he was in Leeds; from there, he was going to make his way through the most important nearby places to another reading in London before visiting Ireland again.
This was the time of the Fenian excitements; it was with great reluctance he consented to go;[259] and he told[317] us all at his first arrival that he should have a complete breakdown. More than 300 stalls were gone at Belfast two days before the reading, but on the afternoon of the reading in Dublin not 50 were taken. Strange to say however a great crowd pressed in at night, he had a tumultuous greeting, and on the 22nd of March I had this announcement from him: "You will be surprised to be told that we have done wonders! Enthusiastic crowds have filled the halls to the roof each night, and hundreds have been turned away. At Belfast the night before last we had £246 5s. In Dublin to-night everything is sold out, and people are besieging Dolby to put chairs anywhere, in doorways, on my platform, in any sort of hole or corner. In short the Readings are a perfect rage at a time when everything else is beaten down." He took the Eastern Counties at his return, and this brought the series to a close. "The reception at Cambridge was something to be proud of in such a place. The colleges mustered in full force, from the biggest guns to the smallest; and went beyond even Manchester in the roars of welcome and rounds of cheers. The place was crammed, and all through the reading everything was taken with the utmost heartiness of enjoyment." The temptation of offers from America had meanwhile again been presented to him so strongly,[318] and in such unlucky connection with immediate family claims threatening excess of expenditure even beyond the income he was making, that he was fain to write to his sister-in-law: "I begin to feel myself drawn towards America as Darnay in the Tale of Two Cities was attracted to Paris. It is my Loadstone Rock." Too surely it was to be so; and Dickens was not to be saved from the consequence of yielding to the temptation, by any such sacrifice as had rescued Darnay.
This was during the Fenian excitement; he didn't want to go, but he agreed to it anyway; and when he first arrived, he told us he was on the verge of a complete breakdown. Over 300 tickets had been sold in Belfast two days before the event, but on the afternoon of the reading in Dublin, fewer than 50 were sold. Strangely enough, a huge crowd showed up that night, and he received an enthusiastic welcome. On March 22nd, I got this message from him: "You’ll be surprised to hear that we have done wonders! Excited crowds have filled the halls to capacity every night, and hundreds have been turned away. In Belfast the night before last, we made £246 5s. In Dublin tonight, everything is sold out, and people are crowding Dolby, asking to put chairs anywhere—doorways, on my platform, in any little nook or cranny. In short, the Readings are a complete hit at a time when everything else is struggling." He continued on to the Eastern Counties after that, which wrapped up the series. "The reception at Cambridge was something to be proud of in such an esteemed place. The colleges came out in full force, from the most prominent to the least, and they welcomed me even more enthusiastically than in Manchester. The place was packed, and throughout the reading, everything was met with the utmost enthusiasm and enjoyment." Meanwhile, the allure of offers from America had come to him again so strongly, coupled with family obligations that threatened to exceed his income, that he felt compelled to write to his sister-in-law: "I’m starting to feel drawn to America like Darnay was drawn to Paris in A Tale of Two Cities. It feels like my Loadstone Rock." Unfortunately, it was destined to happen, and Dickens couldn’t escape the consequences of giving in to that temptation, unlike Darnay who was saved by sacrifice.
The letter which told me of the close of his English readings had in it no word of the farther enterprise, yet it seemed to be in some sort a preparation for it. "Last Monday evening" (14th May) "I finished the 50 Readings with great success. You have no idea how I have worked at them. Feeling it necessary, as their reputation widened, that they should be better than at first, I have learnt them all, so as to have no mechanical drawback in looking after the words. I have tested all the serious passion in them by everything I know; made the humorous points much more humorous; corrected my utterance of certain words; cultivated a self-possession not to be disturbed; and made myself master of the situation. Finishing with Dombey (which I had not read for a long time) I learnt that, like the rest; and did it to myself, often twice a day, with exactly the same pains as at night, over and over and over again." . . . Six days later brought his reply to a remark that no degree of excellence to which he might have brought his readings could reconcile me to what there was little doubt would soon be pressed upon him. "It is curious" (20th May) "that you should touch the American subject, because I must confess[319] that my mind is in a most disturbed state about it. That the people there have set themselves on having the readings, there is no question. Every mail brings me proposals, and the number of Americans at St. James's Hall has been surprising. A certain Mr. Grau, who took Ristori out, and is highly responsible, wrote to me by the last mail (for the second time) saying that if I would give him a word of encouragement he would come over immediately and arrange on the boldest terms for any number I chose, and would deposit a large sum of money at Coutts's. Mr. Fields writes to me on behalf of a committee of private gentlemen at Boston who wished for the credit of getting me out, who desired to hear the readings and did not want profit, and would put down as a guarantee £10,000—also to be banked here. Every American speculator who comes to London repairs straight to Dolby, with similar proposals. And, thus excited, Chappells, the moment this last series was over, proposed to treat for America!" Upon the mere question of these various offers he had little difficulty in making up his mind. If he went at all, he would go on his own account, making no compact with any one. Whether he should go at all, was what he had to determine.
The letter informing me about the end of his English readings didn’t mention any further plans, but it felt like a setup for something bigger. "Last Monday evening" (May 14th) "I wrapped up the 50 Readings with great success. You can’t imagine how hard I worked on them. As their reputation grew, I felt I needed to improve them compared to the first time I did them, so I have learned them all to avoid any mechanical issues while focusing on the delivery. I’ve tested every serious emotion in them with everything I know; made the funny parts even funnier; corrected how I pronounce certain words; developed a calmness that remains unshaken; and became fully in control of the situation. After finishing Dombey (which I hadn’t read in a long time), I realized that, like everything else, I had learned it too, practicing it for myself often twice a day with the exact same effort as at night, again and again." . . . Six days later, I got his response to my comment that no matter how excellent he made his readings, I couldn't accept what would likely soon be proposed to him. "It’s interesting" (May 20th) "that you brought up the American topic because I have to admit that my mind is in a pretty chaotic state about it. There’s no doubt that people there are eager to have the readings. Every mail brings me offers, and the number of Americans at St. James's Hall was astounding. A certain Mr. Grau, who brought Ristori over and is quite reputable, wrote to me last mail (for the second time) saying that if I gave him a word of support, he would come immediately and set up the most ambitious deal for any number I chose, and would deposit a large sum of cash at Coutts's. Mr. Fields contacted me on behalf of a committee of private gentlemen in Boston who wanted the honor of bringing me out, who wanted to hear the readings without profit, and would provide a guarantee of £10,000—also to be kept in a bank here. Every American promoter who visits London goes straight to Dolby with similar offers. And all this excitement made Chappells, right after this last series ended, suggest negotiating for America!" When it came to these various offers, he found it easy to decide. If he went at all, he would do so on his own terms, without making deals with anyone. The real question was whether he should go at all.
One thing with his usual sagacity he saw clearly enough. He must make up his mind quickly. "The Presidential election would be in the autumn of next year. They are a people whom a fancy does not hold long. They are bent upon my reading there, and they believe (on no foundation whatever) that I am going to read there. If I ever go, the time would be when[320] the Christmas number goes to press. Early in this next November." Every sort of enquiry he accordingly set on foot; and so far came to the immediate decision, that, if the answers left him no room to doubt that a certain sum might be realized, he would go. "Have no fear that anything will induce me to make the experiment, if I do not see the most forcible reasons for believing that what I could get by it, added to what I have got, would leave me with a sufficient fortune. I should be wretched beyond expression there. My small powers of description cannot describe the state of mind in which I should drag on from day to day." At the end of May he wrote: "Poor dear Stanfield!" (our excellent friend had passed away the week before). "I cannot think even of him, and of our great loss, for this spectre of doubt and indecision that sits at the board with me and stands at the bedside. I am in a tempest-tossed condition, and can hardly believe that I stand at bay at last on the American question. The difficulty of determining amid the variety of statements made to me is enormous, and you have no idea how heavily the anxiety of it sits upon my soul. But the prize looks so large!" One way at last seemed to open by which it was possible to get at some settled opinion. "Dolby sails for America" (2nd of July) "on Saturday the 3rd of August. It is impossible to come to any reasonable conclusion, without sending eyes and ears on the actual ground. He will take out my MS. for the Children's Magazine. I hope it is droll, and very child-like; though the joke is a grown-up one besides. You must try to like the pirate story, for I am very[321] fond of it." The allusion is to his pleasant Holiday Romance which he had written for Mr. Fields.
One thing he understood very well was that he needed to make a decision quickly. "The presidential election is coming up in the fall of next year. These people don’t hold onto a whim for long. They want me to do a reading there, and they believe (without any real basis) that I'm definitely going to do it. If I ever go, it would have to be when[320] the Christmas edition goes to press, which is early next November." He started looking into every kind of inquiry and came to a preliminary decision: if the answers left no doubt that he could make a certain amount of money, he'd go. "Don't worry that I’ll take the chance unless I see very strong reasons to believe that what I could earn, combined with what I already have, would leave me with a decent fortune. I would be incredibly miserable there. My limited ability to describe it doesn't do justice to the state of mind I would be in day after day." At the end of May, he wrote: "Poor dear Stanfield!" (our good friend had passed away the week before). "I can’t even think about him and our great loss for the shadow of doubt and uncertainty that’s hanging over me. I feel completely overwhelmed, and it’s hard to believe I’m finally facing the whole American situation. The challenge of sorting through the many statements I’ve received is huge, and you have no idea how heavy this anxiety sits on my soul. But the potential reward looks so appealing!" Finally, a path seemed to open up to form a solid opinion. "Dolby is sailing for America" (on July 2nd) "on Saturday, August 3rd. It's impossible to come to any reasonable conclusion without having someone on the ground there. He’ll be taking my manuscript for the Children's Magazine. I hope it’s amusing and very child-like, even though the humor is more adult. You really need to try to like the pirate story because I'm quite[321] fond of it." This refers to his delightful Holiday Romance, which he wrote for Mr. Fields.
Hardly had Mr. Dolby gone when there came that which should have availed to dissuade, far more than any of the arguments which continued to express my objection to the enterprise. "I am laid up," he wrote on the 6th of August, "with another attack in my foot, and was on the sofa all last night in tortures. I cannot bear to have the fomentations taken off for a moment. I was so ill with it on Sunday, and it looked so fierce, that I came up to Henry Thompson. He has gone into the case heartily, and says that there is no doubt the complaint originates in the action of the shoe, in walking, on an enlargement in the nature of a bunion. Erysipelas has supervened upon the injury; and the object is to avoid a gathering, and to stay the erysipelas where it is. Meantime I am on my back, and chafing. . . . I didn't improve my foot by going down to Liverpool to see Dolby off, but I have little doubt of its yielding to treatment, and repose." A few days later he was chafing still; the accomplished physician he consulted having dropped other hints that somewhat troubled him. "I could not walk a quarter of a mile to-night for £500. I make out so many reasons against supposing it to be gouty that I really do not think it is."
Mr. Dolby had barely left when something happened that should have convinced me more than any of the arguments I had against the project. "I'm laid up," he wrote on August 6th, "with another flare-up in my foot, and I was on the sofa all night in agony. I can't stand having the compresses removed for even a moment. I was feeling so sick on Sunday, and it looked so bad that I went to see Henry Thompson. He is really invested in the case and says there’s no doubt the problem comes from the way the shoe affects an enlargement similar to a bunion. Erysipelas has developed from the injury, and the goal is to avoid an abscess and stop the erysipelas where it is. In the meantime, I’m stuck on my back and getting restless... I didn’t help my foot by going down to Liverpool to see Dolby off, but I have little doubt it will respond to treatment and rest." A few days later, he was still restless; the skilled doctor he consulted had dropped some hints that worried him. "I couldn’t walk a quarter of a mile tonight for £500. I can come up with so many reasons against it being gout that I really don’t think it is."
So momentous in my judgment were the consequences of the American journey to him that it seemed right to preface thus much of the inducements and temptations that led to it. My own part in the discussion was that of steady dissuasion throughout: though this might perhaps have been less persistent if I could have reconciled myself to the belief, which I never at any time[322] did, that Public Readings were a worthy employment for a man of his genius. But it had by this time become clear to me that nothing could stay the enterprise. The result of Mr. Dolby's visit to America—drawn up by Dickens himself in a paper possessing still the interest of having given to the Readings when he crossed the Atlantic much of the form they then assumed[260]—reached me when I was staying at Ross; and[323] upon it was founded my last argument against the scheme. This he received in London on the 28th of September, on which day he thus wrote to his eldest daughter: "As I telegraphed after I saw you, I am off[324] to Ross to consult with Mr. Forster and Dolby together. You shall hear, either on Monday, or by Monday's post from London, how I decide finally." The result he wrote to her three days later: "You will have had my telegram that I go to America. After a long discussion with Forster, and consideration of what is to be said on both sides, I have decided to go through with it. We have telegraphed 'Yes' to Boston." Seven days later he wrote to me: "The Scotia being full, I do not sail until lord mayor's day; for which glorious anniversary I have engaged an officer's cabin on deck in the Cuba. I am not in very brilliant spirits at the prospect before me, and am deeply sensible of your motive and reasons for the line you have taken; but I am not in the least shaken in the conviction that I could never quite have given up the idea."
The consequences of the American journey felt so significant to me that it seemed appropriate to start with the reasons and temptations that led to it. Throughout the discussion, my role was to firmly discourage it; although, I might have been less persistent if I could have accepted the idea that Public Readings were a fitting pursuit for someone of his talent. However, it became clear to me that nothing could stop the endeavor. The outcome of Mr. Dolby's trip to America—written up by Dickens himself in a document that still holds interest because it shaped the Readings he performed across the Atlantic—reached me while I was at Ross, and it formed the basis of my final argument against the plan. He received this in London on September 28, the same day he wrote to his oldest daughter: "As I texted you after we met, I'm heading to Ross to consult with Mr. Forster and Dolby together. You'll hear from me by Monday or through Monday's mail from London regarding my final decision." Three days later, he wrote to her: "You should have received my text stating that I’m going to America. After a lengthy discussion with Forster and considering both sides, I've decided to go through with it. We've sent a 'Yes' to Boston." A week later, he wrote to me: "The Scotia is full, so I won't sail until Lord Mayor's Day; for which grand occasion, I've reserved an officer's cabin on deck in the Cuba. I'm not feeling very optimistic about what lies ahead, and I fully understand your reasons for the stance you've taken; but I'm still convinced that I could never fully abandon the idea."
The remaining time was given to preparations; on the 2nd of November there was a Farewell Banquet in the Freemasons' Hall over which Lord Lytton presided; and on the 9th Dickens sailed for Boston. Before he left he had contributed his part to the last of his Christmas Numbers; all the writings he lived to complete were done; and the interval of his voyage may be occupied by a general review of the literary labour of his life.
The remaining time was spent on preparations; on November 2nd, there was a Farewell Banquet at the Freemasons' Hall, which Lord Lytton hosted; and on the 9th, Dickens sailed for Boston. Before he left, he finished his part for the last of his Christmas Numbers; all the writings he was able to complete were done; and the time during his voyage could be used for a general review of his life's literary work.
CHAPTER XIV.
DICKENS AS A NOVELIST.
1836-1870.
THE TALE OF TWO CITIES. | OUR MUTUAL FRIEND. |
GREAT EXPECTATIONS. | DR. MARIGOLD AND TALES FOR AMERICA. |
CHRISTMAS SKETCHES. |
What I have to say generally of Dickens's genius as a writer may be made part of the notice, which still remains to be given, of his writings from The Tale of Two Cities to the time at which we have arrived,[326] leaving Edwin Drood for mention in its place; and this will be accompanied, as in former notices of individual stories, by illustrations drawn from his letters and life. His literary work was so intensely one with his nature that he is not separable from it, and the man and the method throw a singular light on each other. But some allusion to what has been said of these books, by writers assuming to speak with authority, will properly precede what has to be offered by me; and I shall preface this part of my task with the hint of Carlyle, that in looking at a man out of the common it is good for common men to make sure that they "see" before they attempt to "oversee" him.
What’s up I want to say about Dickens's genius as a writer can be included in the notice that still needs to be written about his works from The Tale of Two Cities up to the present time,[326] leaving Edwin Drood for discussion later. This will be accompanied, just like past notices of individual stories, by insights drawn from his letters and life. His literary work was so closely tied to his personality that he can’t be separated from it, and the man and his methods shed unique light on each other. However, a brief mention of what has been said about these books by authoritative writers should appropriately come before my own comments; I’ll start this part of my task with Carlyle’s suggestion that when observing someone extraordinary, it's wise for ordinary people to ensure they "see" before trying to "oversee" him.
Of the French writer, M. Henri Taine, it has before been remarked that his inability to appreciate humour is fatal to his pretensions as a critic of the English novel. But there is much that is noteworthy in his criticism notwithstanding, as well as remarkable in his knowledge of our language; his position entitles him to be heard without a suspicion of partizanship or intentional unfairness; whatever the value of his opinion, the elaboration of its form and expression is itself no common tribute; and what is said in it of Dickens's handling in regard to style and character, embodies temperately objections which have since been taken by some English critics without his impartiality and with less than his ability. As to style M. Taine does not find that the natural or simple prevails sufficiently. The tone is too passionate. The imaginative or poetic side of allusion is so uniformly dwelt on, that the descriptions cease to be subsidiary, and the minute details of pain or pleasure wrought out by them become active[327] agencies in the tale. So vivid and eager is the display of fancy that everything is borne along with it; imaginary objects take the precision of real ones; living thoughts are controlled by inanimate things; the chimes console the poor old ticket-porter; the cricket steadies the rough carrier's doubts; the sea waves soothe the dying boy; clouds, flowers, leaves, play their several parts; hardly a form of matter without a living quality; no silent thing without its voice. Fondling and exaggerating thus what is occasional in the subject of his criticism, into what he has evidently at last persuaded himself is a fixed and universal practice with Dickens, M. Taine proceeds to explain the exuberance by comparing such imagination in its vividness to that of a monomaniac. He fails altogether to apprehend that property in Humour which involves the feeling of subtlest and most affecting analogies, and from which is drawn the rare insight into sympathies between the nature of things and their attributes or opposites, in which Dickens's fancy revelled with such delight. Taking the famous lines which express the lunatic, the lover, and the poet as "of Imagination all compact," in a sense that would have startled not a little the great poet who wrote them, M. Taine places on the same level of creative fancy the phantoms of the lunatic and the personages of the artist. He exhibits Dickens as from time to time, in the several stages of his successive works of fiction, given up to one idea, possessed by it, seeing nothing else, treating it in a hundred forms, exaggerating it, and so dazzling and overpowering his readers with it that escape is impossible. This he maintains to be equally the effect[328] as Mr. Mell the usher plays the flute, as Tom Pinch enjoys or exposes his Pecksniff, as the guard blows his bugle while Tom rides to London, as Ruth Pinch crosses Fountain Court or makes the beefsteak pudding, as Jonas Chuzzlewit commits and returns from the murder, and as the storm which is Steerforth's death-knell beats on the Yarmouth shore. To the same kind of power he attributes the extraordinary clearness with which the commonest objects in all his books, the most ordinary interiors, any old house, a parlour, a boat, a school, fifty things that in the ordinary tale-teller would pass unmarked, are made vividly present and indelible; are brought out with a strength of relief, precision, and force, unapproached in any other writer of prose fiction; with everything minute yet nothing cold, "with all the passion and the patience of the painters of his country." And while excitement in the reader is thus maintained to an extent incompatible with a natural style or simple narrative, M. Taine yet thinks he has discovered, in this very power of awakening a feverish sensibility and moving laughter or tears at the commonest things, the source of Dickens's astonishing popularity. Ordinary people, he says, are so tired of what is always around them, and take in so little of the detail that makes up their lives, that when, all of a sudden, there comes a man to make these things interesting, and turn them into objects of admiration, tenderness, or terror, the effect is enchantment. Without leaving their arm-chairs or their firesides, they find themselves trembling with emotion, their eyes are filled with tears, their cheeks are broad with laughter, and, in the discovery[329] they have thus made that they too can suffer, love, and feel, their very existence seems doubled to them. It had not occurred to M. Taine that to effect so much might seem to leave little not achieved.
Of the French writer M. Henri Taine, it has previously been noted that his inability to appreciate humor is detrimental to his claims as a critic of the English novel. However, his criticism has many noteworthy points, along with a remarkable depth of knowledge about our language; his position allows him to be heard without any suspicion of bias or intentional unfairness. Regardless of the value of his opinion, the intricacy of its form and expression is itself a significant compliment. His remarks about Dickens's approach to style and character present balanced criticisms that have since been echoed by some English critics, who lack his impartiality and skill. Regarding style, M. Taine finds that the natural or simple does not dominate enough. The tone is overly passionate. The imaginative or poetic aspects of allusion are so consistently emphasized that the descriptions stop being supplementary, and the intricate details of pain or pleasure they evoke become active forces in the story. The display of imagination is so vivid and eager that everything gets swept up in it; imagined objects acquire the same precision as real ones; living thoughts are influenced by inanimate things; the chimes comfort the old ticket-porter; the cricket reassures the rough carrier's doubts; the sea waves calm the dying boy; clouds, flowers, and leaves each play their parts; hardly anything is lifeless; no silent thing lacks a voice. By embellishing and exaggerating what is incidental in his critique into what he has apparently convinced himself is a fixed and universal practice of Dickens, M. Taine then explains this exuberance by comparing such vivid imagination to that of a monomaniac. He completely fails to grasp the quality of Humor that involves a sense of subtle and deeply affecting connections, from which come the rare understanding of sympathies between the nature of things and their attributes or opposites, in which Dickens's imagination thrived with such joy. Taking the famous lines that describe the lunatic, the lover, and the poet as "of Imagination all compact," in a way that would have greatly surprised the great poet who wrote them, M. Taine equates the illusions of the lunatic with the characters of the artist. He presents Dickens as at times, throughout the various stages of his different works of fiction, entirely absorbed by one idea, consumed by it, noticing nothing else, presenting it in countless forms, exaggerating it, and dazzling his readers to the point that escape becomes impossible. He claims this holds true for the effect of Mr. Mell the usher playing the flute, Tom Pinch enjoying or exposing his Pecksniff, the guard blowing his bugle as Tom travels to London, Ruth Pinch crossing Fountain Court or preparing the beefsteak pudding, Jonas Chuzzlewit going to and returning from the murder, and the storm, which signifies Steerforth's death, crashing on the Yarmouth shore. He attributes the same kind of power to the extraordinary clarity with which the most mundane objects in all his books—the most ordinary interiors, any old house, a parlor, a boat, a school, and a myriad of things that would go unnoticed by an ordinary storyteller—are made vividly present and unforgettable; they are highlighted with a strength of relief, precision, and force that is unmatched by any other prose fiction writer; with everything intricate yet nothing cold, "with all the passion and the patience of the painters of his country." While this excitement in the reader is sustained to a degree that contradicts a natural style or straightforward narrative, M. Taine believes he has discovered, in this very ability to evoke feverish sensitivity and elicit laughter or tears at the most ordinary things, the reason for Dickens's incredible popularity. Ordinary people, he says, are so weary of what surrounds them and absorb so little of the details that make up their lives, that when someone comes along to make these things interesting and transforms them into subjects of admiration, tenderness, or fear, the effect is enchanting. Without leaving their armchairs or firesides, they find themselves trembling with emotion, their eyes filled with tears, their cheeks flushed with laughter, and, in this realization that they too can suffer, love, and feel, their existence seems doubled. It did not occur to M. Taine that achieving so much might imply that little is left unaccomplished.
So far from it, the critic had satisfied himself that such a power of style must be adverse to a just delineation of character. Dickens is not calm enough, he says, to penetrate to the bottom of what he is dealing with. He takes sides with it as friend or enemy, laughs or cries over it, makes it odious or touching, repulsive or attractive, and is too vehement and not enough inquisitive to paint a likeness. His imagination is at once too vivid and not sufficiently large. Its tenacious quality, and the force and concentration with which his thoughts penetrate into the details he desires to apprehend, form limits to his knowledge, confine him to single traits, and prevent his sounding all the depths of a soul. He seizes on one attitude, trick, expression, or grimace; sees nothing else; and keeps it always unchanged. Mercy Pecksniff laughs at every word, Mark Tapley is nothing but jolly, Mrs. Gamp talks incessantly of Mrs. Harris, Mr. Chillip is invariably timid, and Mr. Micawber is never tired of emphasizing his phrases or passing with ludicrous brusqueness from joy to grief. Each is the incarnation of some one vice, virtue, or absurdity; whereof the display is frequent, invariable, and exclusive. The language I am using condenses with strict accuracy what is said by M. Taine, and has been repeated ad nauseam by others, professing admirers as well as open detractors. Mrs. Gamp and Mr. Micawber, who belong to the first rank of humorous creation, are thus without another word[330] dismissed by the French critic; and he shows no consciousness whatever in doing it, of that very fault in himself for which Dickens is condemned, of mistaking lively observation for real insight.
The critic has concluded that such a powerful writing style is actually a hindrance to accurately portraying character. Dickens, he argues, isn't calm enough to truly understand what he’s dealing with. He either aligns himself as a friend or foe, laughing or crying, making his subjects seem disgusting or heartwarming, off-putting or appealing, and is too intense and not inquisitive enough to create a true likeness. His imagination is both too vivid and not broad enough. Its persistent nature, along with the strength and focus with which he delves into the details he wants to capture, limits his understanding, leading him to focus on isolated traits and preventing him from exploring the full depths of a soul. He fixates on one attitude, quirk, expression, or facial contortion; sees nothing else; and maintains it without change. Mercy Pecksniff laughs at everything, Mark Tapley is perpetually cheerful, Mrs. Gamp constantly talks about Mrs. Harris, Mr. Chillip is always anxious, and Mr. Micawber never tires of highlighting his phrases or abruptly shifting from joy to sadness. Each character embodies a single vice, virtue, or silliness, which is consistently, predictably, and exclusively displayed. The language I'm using precisely summarizes what M. Taine says and has been reiterated ad nauseam by both self-proclaimed fans and outright critics. Mrs. Gamp and Mr. Micawber, both top-tier examples of comedic characters, are thus easily dismissed by the French critic, who shows no self-awareness about the very flaw for which he criticizes Dickens: mistaking lively observation for genuine insight.
He has, however much concession in reserve, being satisfied, by his observation of England, that it is to the people for whom Dickens wrote his deficiencies in art are mainly due. The taste of his nation had prohibited him from representing character in a grand style. The English require too much morality and religion for genuine art. They made him treat love, not as holy and sublime in itself, but as subordinate to marriage; forced him to uphold society and the laws, against nature and enthusiasm; and compelled him to display, in painting such a seduction as in Copperfield, not the progress, ardour, and intoxication of passion, but only the misery, remorse, and despair. The result of such surface religion and morality, combined with the trading spirit, M. Taine continues, leads to so many national forms of hypocrisy, and of greed as well as worship for money, as to justify this great writer of the nation in his frequent choice of those vices for illustration in his tales. But his defect of method again comes into play. He does not deal with vices in the manner of a physiologist, feeling a sort of love for them, and delighting in their finer traits as if they were virtues. He gets angry over them. (I do not interrupt M. Taine, but surely, to take one instance illustrative of many, Dickens's enjoyment in dealing with Pecksniff is as manifest as that he never ceases all the time to make him very hateful.) He cannot, like Balzac, leave morality out of account, and treat a passion,[331] however loathsome, as that great tale-teller did, from the only safe ground of belief, that it is a force, and that force of whatever kind is good. It is essential to an artist of that superior grade, M. Taine holds, no matter how vile his subject, to show its education and temptations, the form of brain or habits of mind that have reinforced the natural tendency, to deduce it from its cause, to place its circumstances around it, and to develop its effects to their extremes. In handling such and such a capital miser, hypocrite, debauchee, or what not, he should never trouble himself about the evil consequences of the vices. He should be too much of a philosopher and artist to remember that he is a respectable citizen. But this is what Dickens never forgets, and he renounces all beauties requiring so corrupt a soil. M. Taine's conclusion upon the whole nevertheless is, that though those triumphs of art which become the property of all the earth have not been his, much has yet been achieved by him. Out of his unequalled observation, his satire, and his sensibility, has proceeded a series of original characters existing nowhere but in England, which will exhibit to future generations not the record of his own genius only, but that of his country and his times.
He has, despite any concessions he might have, come to the conclusion, based on his observations of England, that the shortcomings in Dickens's art primarily stem from the people for whom he wrote. The tastes of his country prevented him from portraying characters in a grand style. The English demand too much morality and religion from true art. They made him view love not as something holy and sublime in itself, but as secondary to marriage; forced him to support society and its laws, even against nature and enthusiasm; and compelled him to show, in depicting seduction as in Copperfield, not the development, passion, and excitement of love, but only the pain, guilt, and despair. According to M. Taine, the combination of superficial morality and religion with a commercial mindset leads to various forms of national hypocrisy and a worship of money, justifying this great writer’s frequent focus on these vices in his stories. But his lack of method becomes apparent again. He doesn’t approach vices like a physiologist, who appreciates them and finds delight in their subtler aspects as if they were virtues. Instead, he gets upset about them. (I won’t interrupt M. Taine, but clearly, for example, Dickens's enjoyment in dealing with Pecksniff is evident, as he consistently makes him very unlikable.) He cannot, like Balzac, ignore morality and treat a passion, no matter how despicable, as that master storyteller did, from the safe belief that it is a force, and that any kind of force is good. M. Taine argues that it’s essential for a superior artist, regardless of how base the subject is, to portray its development and temptations, the nature of the mind that has strengthened its natural tendencies, to trace it back to its cause, surround it with its circumstances, and explore its consequences to the fullest. In dealing with a miser, hypocrite, hedonist, or whatever, he should not concern himself with the harmful outcomes of these vices. He should be philosopher and artist enough to forget that he is a respectable citizen. But this is something Dickens never forgets, and he shuns all beauties that require such a corrupt foundation. M. Taine’s overall conclusion is that although Dickens hasn’t produced the transcendent works of art that belong to the world, he has still accomplished much. From his unparalleled observations, satire, and sensitivity has emerged a series of original characters unique to England, which will show future generations not only his genius but also that of his country and his era.
Between the judgment thus passed by the distinguished French lecturer, and the later comment to be now given from an English critic, certainly not in arrest of that judgment, may fitly come a passage from one of Dickens's letters saying something of the limitations placed upon the artist in England. It may read like a quasi-confession of one of M. Taine's charges, though it was not written with reference to his own[332] but to one of Scott's later novels. "Similarly" (15th of August 1856) "I have always a fine feeling of the honest state into which we have got, when some smooth gentleman says to me or to some one else when I am by, how odd it is that the hero of an English book is always uninteresting—too good—not natural, &c. I am continually hearing this of Scott from English people here, who pass their lives with Balzac and Sand. But O my smooth friend, what a shining impostor you must think yourself and what an ass you must think me, when you suppose that by putting a brazen face upon it you can blot out of my knowledge the fact that this same unnatural young gentleman (if to be decent is to be necessarily unnatural), whom you meet in those other books and in mine, must be presented to you in that unnatural aspect by reason of your morality, and is not to have, I will not say any of the indecencies you like, but not even any of the experiences, trials, perplexities, and confusions inseparable from the making or unmaking of all men!"
Between the judgment made by the esteemed French lecturer and the later comment from an English critic, which certainly won't challenge that judgment, it's fitting to include a passage from one of Dickens's letters discussing the limitations placed on artists in England. It might sound like a partial acknowledgment of one of M. Taine's criticisms, though it wasn't written in response to his own, but rather to one of Scott's later novels. "Similarly" (August 15, 1856) "I always have a strong sense of the honest situation we've arrived at when some smooth gentleman says to me or someone else when I'm around, how strange it is that the hero of an English book is always boring—too good—not realistic, etc. I constantly hear this about Scott from English people here, who spend their lives reading Balzac and Sand. But oh my smooth friend, what a shining fraud you must think you are and how foolish you must think I am, when you assume that by putting on a bold face you can erase from my understanding the fact that this same unnatural young gentleman (if being decent means being necessarily unnatural), whom you encounter in those other books and in mine, must be presented to you in that unnatural way because of your morality, and is not allowed, I won't say any of the indecencies you prefer, but not even any of the experiences, trials, puzzlements, and confusions that are part of the making or unmaking of all people!"
M. Taine's criticism was written three or four years before Dickens's death, and to the same date belong some notices in England which adopted more or less the tone of depreciation; conceding the great effects achieved by the writer, but disputing the quality and value of his art. For it is incident to all such criticism of Dickens to be of necessity accompanied by the admission, that no writer has so completely impressed himself on the time in which he lived, that he has made his characters a part of literature, and that his readers are the world.
M. Taine's critique was written about three or four years before Dickens passed away, and around the same time, there were some reviews in England that adopted a somewhat dismissive tone. They acknowledged the significant impact the author had, but questioned the quality and worth of his craft. It's common for critiques of Dickens to come with the recognition that no other writer has so thoroughly left his mark on the era he lived in, creating characters that have become part of literature, with readers from all over the world.
But, a little more than a year after his death, a paper[333] was published of which the object was to reconcile such seeming inconsistency, to expound the inner meanings of "Dickens in relation to Criticism," and to show that, though he had a splendid genius and a wonderful imagination, yet the objectors were to be excused who called him only a stagy sentimentalist and a clever caricaturist. This critical essay appeared in the Fortnightly Review for February 1872, with the signature of Mr. George Henry Lewes; and the pretentious airs of the performance, with its prodigious professions of candour, force upon me the painful task of stating what it really is. During Dickens's life, especially when any fresh novelist could be found available for strained comparison with him, there were plenty of attempts to write him down: but the trick of studied depreciation was never carried so far or made so odious as in this case, by intolerable assumptions of an indulgent superiority; and to repel it in such a form once for all is due to Dickens's memory.
But a little over a year after his death, a paper[333] was published aiming to reconcile this apparent inconsistency, explain the deeper meanings of "Dickens in relation to Criticism," and demonstrate that, despite his extraordinary genius and remarkable imagination, those who dismissed him as just a melodramatic sentimentalist and a skillful caricaturist could be understood. This critical essay appeared in the Fortnightly Review in February 1872, signed by Mr. George Henry Lewes. The pretentious tone of the piece, with its grand claims of honesty, forces me to point out what it actually is. During Dickens's lifetime, especially when any new novelist could be compared to him, there were many attempts to undermine his reputation: but the effort to deliberately belittle him was never taken as far or made as repugnant as in this instance, marked by unbearable claims of condescending superiority. It's important to challenge this portrayal for the sake of Dickens's legacy.
The paper begins by the usual concessions—that he was a writer of vast popularity, that he delighted no end of people, that his admirers were in all classes and all countries, that he stirred the sympathy of masses not easily reached through literature and always to healthy emotion, that he impressed a new direction on popular writing, and modified the literature of his age in its spirit no less than its form. The very splendour of these successes, on the other hand, so deepened the shadow of his failures, that to many there was nothing but darkness. Was it unnatural? Could greatness be properly ascribed, by the fastidious, to a writer whose defects were so glaring, exaggerated, untrue, fantastic,[334] and melodramatic? Might they not fairly insist on such defects as outweighing all positive qualities, and speak of him with condescending patronage or sneering irritation? Why, very often such men, though their talk would be seasoned with quotations from, and allusions to, his writings, and though they would lay aside their most favourite books to bury themselves in his new "number," had been observed by this critic to be as niggardly in their praise of him as they were lavish in their scorn. He actually heard "a very distinguished man," on one occasion, express measureless contempt for Dickens, and a few minutes afterwards admit that Dickens had "entered into his life." And so the critic betook himself to the task of reconciling this immense popularity and this critical contempt, which he does after the following manner.
The paper starts with the usual acknowledgments—that he was an immensely popular writer, that he brought joy to countless people, that his fans came from every social class and country, that he connected with audiences not usually drawn to literature, and that he always inspired healthy emotions. He changed the course of popular writing and shaped the literature of his time in both spirit and style. However, the very brilliance of these achievements cast a deep shadow over his failures, leading many to see nothing but darkness. Was it unreasonable? Could a discerning person recognize greatness in a writer whose flaws were so obvious, exaggerated, untrue, fantastical, and melodramatic? Might they not fairly argue that these defects outweighed any positive traits and refer to him with condescending patronage or dismissive annoyance? Frequently, such people, even though their conversations included quotes and references from his works and they set aside their favorite books to dive into his latest “number,” were noted by this critic to be as eager to praise him as they were to deride him. He actually heard "a very distinguished man" once express utter disdain for Dickens, only to then concede that Dickens had "entered into his life." Thus, the critic took on the challenge of reconciling this massive popularity with the critical disdain, which he does in the following way.
He says that Dickens was so great in "fun" (humour he does not concede to him anywhere) that Fielding and Smollett are small in comparison, but that this would only have been a passing amusement for the world if he had not been "gifted with an imagination of marvellous vividness, and an emotional sympathetic nature capable of furnishing that imagination with elements of universal power." To people who think that words should carry some meaning it might seem, that, if only a man could be "gifted" with all this, nothing more need be said. With marvellous imagination, and a nature to endow it with elements of universal power, what secrets of creative art could possibly be closed to him? But this is reckoning without your philosophical critic. The vividness of Dickens's imagination M. Taine found to be simply monomaniacal, and his follower[335] finds it to be merely hallucinative. Not the less he heaps upon it epithet after epithet. He talks of its irradiating splendour; calls it glorious as well as imperial and marvellous; and, to make us quite sure he is not with these fine phrases puffing-off an inferior article, he interposes that such imagination is "common to all great writers." Luckily for great writers in general, however, their creations are of the old, immortal, commonplace sort; whereas Dickens in his creative processes, according to this philosophy of criticism, is tied up hard and fast within hallucinative limits.
He argues that Dickens was so great in "fun" (he doesn't credit him with humor anywhere else) that Fielding and Smollett seem small by comparison, but this would only have been a temporary entertainment for the world if he hadn’t been "blessed with a vividly imaginative mind and an emotionally sympathetic nature that could provide that imagination with elements of universal significance." For those who believe that words should have meaning, it might seem that if a person could be "blessed" with all this, nothing more needs to be said. With such remarkable imagination and a nature that offers it elements of universal significance, what secrets of creative art could possibly be out of reach? But this overlooks your philosophical critic. M. Taine found the vividness of Dickens's imagination to be simply obsessive, and his follower[335] finds it merely hallucinatory. Nevertheless, he piles on the praise, describing its radiant brilliance; he calls it glorious, as well as imperial and marvelous; and to ensure we understand he isn’t just using flowery language to promote something inferior, he adds that such imagination is "common to all great writers." Fortunately for great writers in general, their creations are of the classic, timeless, and commonplace variety; whereas, according to this critical philosophy, Dickens is firmly trapped within hallucinatory confines in his creative processes.
"He was," we are told, "a seer of visions." Amid silence and darkness, we are assured, he heard voices and saw objects; of which the revived impressions to him had the vividness of sensations, and the images his mind created in explanation of them had the coercive force of realities;[261] so that what he brought into existence in this way, no matter how fantastic and unreal, was (whatever this may mean) universally intelligible. "His types established themselves in the public mind like personal experiences. Their falsity[336] was unnoticed in the blaze of their illumination. Every humbug seemed a Pecksniff, every jovial improvident a Micawber, every stinted serving-wench a Marchioness." The critic, indeed, saw through it all, but he gave his warnings in vain. "In vain critical reflection showed these figures to be merely masks; not characters, but personified characteristics; caricatures and distortions of human nature. The vividness of their presentation triumphed over reflection; their creator managed to communicate to the public his own unhesitating belief." What, however, is the public? Mr Lewes goes on to relate. "Give a child a wooden horse, with hair for mane and tail, and wafer-spots for colouring, he will never be disturbed by the fact that this horse does not move its legs but runs on wheels; and this wooden horse, which he can handle and draw, is believed in more than a pictured horse by a Wouvermanns or an Ansdell(!!) It may be said of Dickens's human figures that they too are wooden, and run on wheels; but these are details which scarcely disturb the belief of admirers. Just as the wooden horse is brought within the range of the child's emotions, and dramatizing tendencies, when he can handle and draw it, so Dickens's figures are brought within the range of the reader's interests, and receive from these interests a sudden illumination, when they are the puppets of a drama every incident of which appeals to the sympathies."
"He was," we're told, "a visionary." In the silence and darkness, we're assured he heard voices and saw things; the revived impressions were as vivid to him as real sensations, and the images his mind created to explain them had the compelling force of reality;[261] so what he brought to life, no matter how fantastic and unreal, was (whatever that means) universally understandable. "His types became embedded in the public consciousness like personal experiences. Their falsehoods went unnoticed in the glow of their brightness. Every fake seemed like a Pecksniff, every cheerful spendthrift a Micawber, every underwhelming servant girl a Marchioness." The critic, indeed, saw through it all, but his warnings fell on deaf ears. "In vain did critical reflection reveal these figures as mere masks; not real characters, but personified traits; caricatures and distortions of human nature. The vividness of their portrayal overshadowed thoughtful analysis; their creator succeeded in conveying his own unwavering belief to the public." But who is the public? Mr. Lewes continues. "Give a child a wooden horse, with a mane and tail made of hair, and spots painted with wafer, and he won't mind that this horse doesn’t move its legs but rolls on wheels; this wooden horse, which he can touch and pull along, is believed in more than a painted horse by a Wouvermanns or an Ansdell(!!) It could be said that Dickens's human figures are also wooden and run on wheels; but these details hardly shake the belief of his fans. Just like the wooden horse gets within the realm of a child's emotions and dramatic tendencies when he can handle and pull it, Dickens's characters engage the reader's interests and receive a sudden spark of life when they are the puppets of a story that engages the sympathies at every turn."
Risum teneatis? But the smile is grim that rises to the face of one to whom the relations of the writer and his critic, while both writer and critic lived, are known; and who sees the drift of now scattering such rubbish[337] as this over an established fame. As it fares with the imagination that is imperial, so with the drama every incident of which appeals to the sympathies. The one being explained by hallucination, and the other by the wooden horse, plenty of fine words are to spare by which contempt may receive the show of candour. When the characters in a play are puppets, and the audiences of the theatre fools or children, no wise man forfeits his wisdom by proceeding to admit that the successful playwright, "with a fine felicity of instinct," seized upon situations, for his wooden figures, having "irresistible hold over the domestic affections;" that, through his puppets, he spoke "in the mother-tongue of the heart;" that, with his spotted horses and so forth, he "painted the life he knew and everyone knew;" that he painted, of course, nothing ideal or heroic, and that the world of thought and passion lay beyond his horizon; but that, with his artificial performers and his feeble-witted audiences, "all the resources of the bourgeois epic were in his grasp; the joys and pains of childhood, the petty tyrannies of ignoble natures, the genial pleasantries of happy natures, the life of the poor, the struggles of the street and back parlour, the insolence of office, the sharp social contrasts, east wind and Christmas jollity, hunger, misery, and hot punch"—"so that even critical spectators who complained that these broadly painted pictures were artistic daubs could not wholly resist their effective suggestiveness." Since Trinculo and Caliban were under one cloak, there has surely been no such delicate monster with two voices. "His forward voice, now, is to speak well of his friend; his backward voice is to utter foul speeches and to[338] detract." One other of the foul speeches I may not overlook, since it contains what is alleged to be a personal revelation of Dickens made to the critic himself.
Can you hold back your laughter? But the smile is grim for anyone who knows the relationship between the writer and his critic while they were both alive, and who sees the intention behind spreading such nonsense[337] over an established reputation. Just as a powerful imagination brings forth imperial thoughts, every incident in a drama appeals to our emotions. One is explained by delusion, the other by a wooden horse, and there are plenty of fancy words available that can make contempt seem honest. When the characters in a play are mere puppets and the theater audience consists of fools or children, no wise person loses their wisdom by acknowledging that the successful playwright, "with a great instinct," managed to capture situations for his wooden figures that had "an irresistible grip on family feelings;" that, through his puppets, he spoke "in the heartfelt language we all understand;" that, with his flashy scenes and so forth, he "depicted the life he was familiar with and that everyone recognized;" that he depicted, of course, nothing ideal or heroic, and that the world of thought and emotion was beyond his reach; but that, with his artificial characters and naive audiences, "he had access to all the tools of the bourgeois epic; the joys and pains of childhood, the petty tyrannies of base personalities, the cheerful humor of joyful characters, the lives of the poor, the struggles of everyday life, the arrogance of authority, stark social contrasts, the biting cold and festive cheer, hunger, suffering, and warm drinks"—"so even critical viewers who claimed these broadly drawn images were artistic messes could not completely resist their powerful suggestion." Since Trinculo and Caliban shared a cloak, surely no creature as delicate with two voices has appeared since then. "His forward voice now praises his friend; his backward voice hurls insults and[338] undermines." One more insult I cannot overlook, as it allegedly includes a personal confession from Dickens to the critic himself.
"When one thinks of Micawber always presenting himself in the same situation, moved with the same springs and uttering the same sounds, always confident of something turning up, always crushed and rebounding, always making punch—and his wife always declaring she will never part from him, always referring to his talents and her family—when one thinks of the 'catchwords' personified as characters, one is reminded of the frogs whose brains have been taken out for physiological purposes, and whose actions henceforth want the distinctive peculiarity of organic action, that of fluctuating spontaneity." Such was that sheer inability of Dickens, indeed, to comprehend this complexity of the organism, that it quite accounted, in the view of this philosopher, for all his unnaturalness, for the whole of his fantastic people, and for the strained dialogues of which his books are made up, painfully resembling in their incongruity "the absurd and eager expositions which insane patients pour into the listener's ear when detailing their wrongs, or their schemes. Dickens once declared to me," Mr. Lewes continues, "that every word said by his characters was distinctly heard by him; I was at first not a little puzzled to account for the fact that he could hear language so utterly unlike the language of real feeling, and not be aware of its preposterousness; but the surprise vanished when I thought of the phenomena of hallucination." Wonderful sagacity! to unravel easily such a bewildering "puzzle"! And so to the close. Between the uncultivated whom Dickens[339] moved, and the cultivated he failed to move; between the power that so worked in delft as to stir the universal heart, and the commonness that could not meddle with porcelain or aspire to any noble clay; the pitiful see-saw is continued up to the final sentence, where, in the impartial critic's eagerness to discredit even the value of the emotion awakened in such men as Jeffrey by such creations as Little Nell, he reverses all he has been saying about the cultivated and uncultivated, and presents to us a cultivated philosopher, in his ignorance of the stage, applauding an actor whom every uncultivated playgoing apprentice despises as stagey. But the bold stroke just exhibited, of bringing forward Dickens himself in the actual crisis of one of his fits of hallucination, requires an additional word.
"When you think of Micawber always finding himself in the same situation, driven by the same motivations and saying the same things, always hopeful that something good will happen, always feeling defeated yet bouncing back, always trying to make a joke—and his wife always insisting that she'll never leave him, constantly mentioning his talents and her family—when you think of these 'catchphrases' brought to life as characters, it reminds you of frogs with their brains removed for science, whose movements lack the unique quality of real life, that of unpredictable spontaneity." This inability of Dickens to grasp this complexity of the human experience explains, according to this philosopher, all his unnaturalness, his entire cast of bizarre characters, and the awkward dialogues that fill his books, which painfully echo "the nonsensical and frantic explanations that mentally ill patients share with listeners while recounting their grievances or schemes." Mr. Lewes continues, "Dickens once told me that he distinctly heard every word spoken by his characters; I was initially quite puzzled trying to understand how he could hear language that was so completely different from genuine emotions and not recognize its absurdity; but my confusion faded when I considered the nature of hallucinations." How insightful to easily unravel such a confusing "puzzle"! And so we come to the end. Between those unrefined individuals whom Dickens inspired and the educated ones he failed to touch; between the ability that could resonate in delft to stir the universal heart, and the mediocrity that couldn't engage with porcelain or aspire to any noble substance; this pitiful back-and-forth continues up to the final sentence, where, in the critic's eagerness to undermine even the significance of the emotions stirred in people like Jeffrey by creations such as Little Nell, he contradicts everything he has said about the educated and the uneducated, presenting us with a well-educated philosopher, ignorant of the theatre, praising an actor whom every unrefined theatre-goer considers overly theatrical. However, the bold move of introducing Dickens himself during one of his hallucination episodes requires a few more words.
To establish the hallucinative theory, he is said on one occasion to have declared to the critic that every word uttered by his characters was distinctly heard by him before it was written down. Such an averment, not credible for a moment as thus made, indeed simply untrue to the extent described, may yet be accepted in the limited and quite different sense which a passage in one of Dickens's letters gives to it. All writers of genius to whom their art has become as a second nature, will be found capable of doing upon occasion what the vulgar may think to be "hallucination," but hallucination will never account for. After Scott began the Bride of Lammermoor he had one of his terrible seizures of cramp, yet during his torment he dictated[262] that[340] fine novel; and when he rose from his bed, and the published book was placed in his hands, "he did not," James Ballantyne explicitly assured Lockhart, "recollect one single incident, character, or conversation it contained." When Dickens was under the greatest trial of his life, and illness and sorrow were contending for the mastery over him, he thus wrote to me. "Of my distress I will say no more than that it has borne a terrible, frightful, horrible proportion to the quickness of the gifts you remind me of. But may I not be forgiven for thinking it a wonderful testimony to my being made for my art, that when, in the midst of this trouble and pain, I sit down to my book, some beneficent power shows it all to me, and tempts me to be interested, and I don't invent it—really do not—but see it, and write it down. . . . It is only when it all fades away and is gone, that I begin to suspect that its momentary relief has cost me something."
To support the hallucinative theory, he reportedly told a critic that every word spoken by his characters was clearly heard by him before he wrote it down. This claim, hard to believe at face value and actually untrue in the way expressed, can still be interpreted in a more limited and different sense as suggested by a passage in one of Dickens's letters. All gifted writers who have made their craft second nature can occasionally achieve what the average person might call "hallucination," but hallucination alone will never explain it. After Scott began the Bride of Lammermoor, he experienced one of his intense cramps, yet during this ordeal, he dictated[262] that[340] excellent novel; and when he got out of bed, with the published book in his hands, "he did not," James Ballantyne clearly reassured Lockhart, "remember a single incident, character, or conversation it contained." When Dickens faced the greatest challenges of his life, with illness and sorrow battling for control, he wrote to me: "About my distress, I will say no more than that it has been overwhelmingly, frighteningly, horribly disproportionate to the swiftness of the talents you remind me of. But can I not be forgiven for believing it’s a remarkable proof of my being meant for my art, that when I sit down to write amidst this trouble and pain, some generous force reveals it all to me and encourages me to engage with it? I truly don’t make it up— I really see it and write it down. . . . It’s only when it eventually fades away and disappears that I begin to suspect its brief relief has taken a toll on me."
Whatever view may be taken of the man who wrote those words, he had the claim to be judged by reference to the highest models in the art which he studied. In the literature of his time, from 1836 to 1870, he held the most conspicuous place, and his claim to the most[341] popular one in the literature of fiction was by common consent admitted. He obtained this rank by the sheer force of his genius, unhelped in any way, and he held it without dispute. As he began he closed. After he had written for only four months, and after he had written incessantly for four and thirty years, he was of all living writers the most widely read. It is of course quite possible that such popularity might imply rather littleness in his contemporaries than greatness in him: but his books are the test to judge by. Each thus far, as it appeared, has had notice in these pages for its illustration of his life, or of his method of work, or of the variety and versatility in the manifestations of his power. But his latest books remain still for notice, and will properly suggest what is farther to be said of his general place in literature.
No matter what opinion one might have about the man who wrote those words, he should be evaluated against the highest standards in the art he pursued. During his lifetime, from 1836 to 1870, he occupied the most prominent position in literature, and it was widely acknowledged that he was the most popular figure in fiction. He earned this status solely due to his incredible talent, without any outside help, and held it without question. He started as he finished. After writing for just four months and then continuously for thirty-four years, he became the most widely read author among living writers. It’s certainly possible that such popularity reflects more on the shortcomings of his peers rather than his own greatness, but his works serve as the benchmark for judgment. Each of his books published so far has been highlighted in these pages to illustrate his life, his working method, or the range and versatility of his abilities. However, his most recent works still deserve attention and will appropriately indicate what more can be said about his overall position in literature.
His leading quality was Humour. It has no mention in either of the criticisms cited, but it was his highest faculty; and it accounts for his magnificent successes, as well as for his not infrequent failures, in characteristic delineation. He was conscious of this himself. Five years before he died, a great and generous brother artist, Lord Lytton, amid much ungrudging praise of a work he was then publishing, asked him to consider, as to one part of it, if the modesties of art were not a little overpassed. "I cannot tell you," he replied, "how highly I prize your letter, or with what pride and pleasure it inspires me. Nor do I for a moment question its criticism (if objection so generous and easy may be called by that hard name) otherwise than on this ground—that I work slowly and with great care, and never give way to my invention[342] recklessly, but constantly restrain it; and that I think it is my infirmity to fancy or perceive relations in things which are not apparent generally. Also, I have such an inexpressible enjoyment of what I see in a droll light, that I dare say I pet it as if it were a spoilt child. This is all I have to offer in arrest of judgment." To perceive relations in things which are not apparent generally, is one of those exquisite properties of humour by which are discovered the affinities between the high and the low, the attractive and the repulsive, the rarest things and things of every day, which bring us all upon the level of a common humanity. It is this which gives humour an immortal touch that does not belong of necessity to pictures, even the most exquisite, of mere character or manners; the property which in its highest aspects Carlyle so subtly described as a sort of inverse sublimity, exalting into our affections what is below us as the other draws down into our affections what is above us. But it has a danger which Dickens also hints at, and into which he often fell. All humour has in it, is indeed identical with, what ordinary people are apt to call exaggeration; but there is an excess beyond the allowable even here, and to "pet" or magnify out of proper bounds its sense of what is droll, is to put the merely grotesque in its place. What might have been overlooked in a writer with no uncommon powers of invention, was thrown into overpowering prominence by Dickens's wealth of fancy; and a splendid excess of his genius came to be objected to as its integral and essential quality.
His main quality was humor. Though it's not mentioned in any of the criticisms cited, it was his greatest strength and explains both his amazing successes and his occasional failures in character depiction. He was aware of this himself. Five years before he died, a great and generous fellow artist, Lord Lytton, praised a work he was then publishing and asked him to consider if, in one part of it, the modest standards of art were slightly overlooked. "I can't express how much I value your letter or the pride and joy it gives me. I don't question your criticism for a moment (if such generous and easy feedback can be called that) except for this reason—that I work slowly and carefully, and never let my imagination run wild, but constantly hold it back; and I think it’s my weakness to imagine or perceive connections in things that aren’t generally obvious. Also, I find such immense joy in seeing things in a humorous light that I can't help but nurture it as if it were a spoiled child. This is all I have to say in my defense." To perceive connections in things that aren't generally obvious is one of the beautiful traits of humor that reveals the bonds between the high and the low, the attractive and the unpleasant, the rare and the everyday, placing us all on a common human level. This gives humor a timeless quality that don't necessarily belong to even the most exquisite depictions of character or manners; it's a trait that, in its highest forms, Carlyle cleverly described as a kind of inverted sublimity, lifting our feelings toward what is beneath us, while the other brings our feelings down to what is above us. However, there's a risk, which Dickens also hinted at and often fell into. All humor has within it, and is indeed identical to, what ordinary people tend to call exaggeration; but there’s a limit even here, and to "nurture" or amplify beyond normal bounds its sense of what is funny is to place the merely bizarre in its stead. What might have been overlooked in a writer with no exceptional powers of invention was highlighted by Dickens's rich imagination, and a notable excess of his genius came to be criticized as its core and essential trait.
It cannot be said to have had any place in his earlier[343] books. His powers were not at their highest and the humour was less fine and subtle, but there was no such objection to be taken. No misgiving interrupted the enjoyment of the wonderful freshness of animal spirits in Pickwick; but beneath its fun, laughter, and light-heartedness were indications of power of the first rank in the delineation of character. Some caricature was in the plan; but as the circle of people widened beyond the cockney club, and the delightful oddity of Mr. Pickwick took more of an independent existence, a different method revealed itself, nothing appeared beyond the exaggerations permissible to humorous comedy, and the art was seen which can combine traits vividly true to particular men or women with propensities common to all mankind. This has its highest expression in Fielding: but even the first of Dickens's books showed the same kind of mastery; and, by the side of its life-like middle-class people universally familiar, there was one figure before seen by none but at once knowable by all, delightful for the surprise it gave by its singularity and the pleasure it gave by its truth; and, though short of the highest in this form of art, taking rank with the class in which live everlastingly the dozen unique inventions that have immortalized the English novel. The groups in Oliver Twist, Fagin and his pupils, Sikes and Nancy, Mr. Bumble and his parish-boy, belong to the same period; when Dickens also began those pathetic delineations that opened to the neglected, the poor, and the fallen, a world of compassion and tenderness. Yet I think it was not until the third book, Nickleby, that he began to have his place as a writer conceded to him;[344] and that he ceased to be regarded as a mere phenomenon or marvel of fortune, who had achieved success by any other means than that of deserving it, and who challenged no criticism better worth the name than such as he has received from the Fortnightly reviewer. It is to be added to what before was said of Nickleby, that it established beyond dispute his mastery of dialogue, or that power of making characters real existences, not by describing them but by letting them describe themselves, which belongs only to story-tellers of the first rank. Dickens never excelled the easy handling of the subordinate groups in this novel, and he never repeated its mistakes in the direction of aristocratic or merely polite and dissipated life. It displayed more than before of his humour on the tragic side; and, in close connection with its affecting scenes of starved and deserted childhood, were placed those contrasts of miser and spendthrift, of greed and generosity, of hypocrisy and simple-heartedness, which he handled in later books with greater power and fullness, but of which the first formal expression was here. It was his first general picture, so to speak, of the character and manners of his time, which it was the design more or less of all his books to exhibit; and it suffers by comparison with his later productions, because the humour is not to the same degree enriched by imagination; but it is free from the not infrequent excess into which that supreme gift also tempted its possessor. None of the tales is more attractive throughout, and on the whole it was a step in advance even of the stride previously taken. Nor was the gain lost in the succeeding story of the Old Curiosity Shop. The humorous[345] traits of Mrs. Nickleby could hardly be surpassed: but, in Dick Swiveller and the Marchioness, there was a subtlety and lightness of touch that led to finer issues; and around Little Nell[263] and her fortunes, surpassingly touching and beautiful, let criticism object what it will, were gathered some small characters that had a deeper intention and more imaginative insight, than anything yet done. Strokes of this kind were also observable in the hunted life of the murderer in Barnaby Rudge; and his next book, Chuzzlewit, was, as it still remains, one of his greatest achievements. Even so brief a retrospect of the six opening years of Dickens's literary labour will help to a clearer judgment of the work of the twenty-eight more years that remained to him.
It can't be said that this had any role in his earlier[343] books. His skills weren't at their peak then, and the humor was less refined and subtle, but there were no real objections to that. No doubts interrupted the enjoyment of the incredible freshness of energy in Pickwick; beneath its fun, laughter, and carefree spirit were signs of first-rate talent in character portrayal. Some caricature was included in the plan; but as the group of characters expanded beyond the Cockney club, and Mr. Pickwick's charming oddity gained a more independent presence, a different approach became evident. Nothing exceeded the exaggerations allowed in humorous comedy, and the skill was apparent in combining traits that were vividly true to specific men or women with tendencies common to all humanity. This reaches its peak in Fielding, but even in Dickens's earliest works, the same mastery was evident; alongside its lifelike middle-class characters that everyone recognized, there was one figure previously unseen yet instantly relatable, delightful for its uniqueness and truthful charm. Though it didn't reach the highest level in this art form, it ranked among the lasting classics that have immortalized the English novel. The characters in Oliver Twist, like Fagin and his students, Sikes and Nancy, Mr. Bumble and his parish boy, belong to the same era; when Dickens also began those poignant portrayals that opened a world of compassion and tenderness to the neglected, poor, and fallen. However, I think it wasn't until his third book, Nickleby, that he started to gain recognition as a legitimate writer;[344] he stopped being viewed as just a curious phenomenon or lucky breakthrough, who achieved success through means other than merit, and who attracted little more criticism than what he received from the Fortnightly reviewer. It's worth adding to previous remarks about Nickleby, that it undeniably established his mastery of dialogue, or the ability to make characters feel real, not by describing them but by allowing them to express themselves, a talent reserved for top-tier storytellers. Dickens never surpassed his effortless handling of the supporting characters in this novel, and he never repeated its errors regarding aristocratic or merely polite and decadent lifestyles. It showcased more of his humor's tragic side than before; and closely connected to its moving scenes of starving and abandoned childhood were the contrasts of misers and spendthrifts, greed and generosity, hypocrisy and sincerity, which he later depicted with even greater power and depth, but the first formal expression of them was found here. This was his first broad portrait, so to speak, of the character and manners of his time, which he aimed to capture in all his works; and while it pales in comparison to his later writings, because the humor lacks the same level of imaginative richness, it avoids the common excess into which that ultimate talent can lead its possessor. None of the stories are more consistently engaging, and overall it marked progress, even compared to the earlier leap made. That advancement carried over into the following story, Old Curiosity Shop. The humorous characteristics of Mrs. Nickleby were hardly surpassable: yet, in Dick Swiveller and the Marchioness, there was a delicacy and light touch that led to more profound outcomes; and around Little Nell[263] and her extraordinarily touching and beautiful journey, regardless of criticism, there were smaller characters who held deeper intentions and more imaginative insight than anything done so far. Similar insights were also visible in the troubled life of the murderer in Barnaby Rudge; and his next book, Chuzzlewit, remains one of his greatest accomplishments. Even this brief look back at the first six years of Dickens's literary career will help provide a clearer perspective on the work he produced over the next twenty-eight years.
To the special observations already made on the series of stories which followed the return from America, Chuzzlewit, Dombey, Copperfield, and Bleak House, in which attention has been directed to the higher purpose and more imaginative treatment that distinguished them,[264] a general remark is to be added. Though the[346] range of character they traverse is not wide, it is surrounded by a fertility of invention and illustration without example in any previous novelist; and it is represented in these books, so to speak, by a number and variety of existences sufficiently real to have taken places as among the actual people of the world. Could half as many known and universally recognisable men and women be selected out of one story, by any other prose writer of the first rank, as at once rise to the mind from one of the masterpieces of Dickens? So difficult of dispute is this, that as much perhaps will be admitted; but then it will be added, if the reply is by a critic of the school burlesqued by Mr. Lewes, that after all they are not individual or special men and women so much as general impersonations of men and women, abstract types made up of telling catchwords or surface traits, though with such accumulation upon them of a wonderful wealth of humorous illustration, itself filled with minute and accurate knowledge of life, that the real nakedness of the land of character is hidden. Well, what can be rejoined to this, but that the poverty or richness of any territory worth survey will for the most part lie in the kind of observation brought to it. There was no finer observer than Johnson of the manners of his time, and he protested of their greatest delineator that he knew only the shell of life. Another[347] of his remarks, after a fashion followed by the criticizers of Dickens, places Fielding below one of his famous contemporaries; but who will not now be eager to reverse such a comparison, as that Fielding tells you correctly enough what o'clock it is by looking at the face of the dial, but that Richardson shows you how the watch is made? There never was a subtler or a more sagacious observer than Fielding, or who better deserved what is generously said of him by Smollett, that he painted the characters and ridiculed the follies of life with equal strength, humour, and propriety. But might it not be said of him, as of Dickens, that his range of character was limited; and that his method of proceeding from a central idea in all his leading people, exposed him equally to the charge of now and then putting human nature itself in place of the individual who should only be a small section of it? This is in fact but another shape of what I have expressed on a former page, that what a character, drawn by a master, will roughly present upon its surface, is frequently such as also to satisfy its more subtle requirements; and that when only the salient points or sharper prominences are thus displayed, the great novelist is using his undoubted privilege of showing the large degree to which human intercourse is carried on, not by men's habits or ways at their commonest, but by the touching of their extremes. A definition of Fielding's genius has been made with some accuracy in the saying, that he shows common propensities in connection with the identical unvarnished adjuncts which are peculiar to the individual, nor could a more exquisite felicity of handling than this be any man's[348] aim or desire; but it would be just as easy, by employment of the critical rules applied to Dickens, to transform it into matter of censure. Partridge, Adams, Trulliber, Squire Western, and the rest, present themselves often enough under the same aspects, and use with sufficient uniformity the same catchwords, to be brought within the charge of mannerism; and though M. Taine cannot fairly say of Fielding as of Dickens, that he suffers from too much morality, he brings against him precisely the charge so strongly put against the later novelist of "looking upon the passions not as simple forces but as objects of approbation or blame." We must keep in mind all this to understand the worth of the starved fancy, that can find in such a delineation as that of Micawber only the man described by Mr. Lewes as always in the same situation, moved with the same springs and uttering the same sounds, always confident of something turning up, always crushed and rebounding, always making punch, and his wife always declaring she will never part from him. It is not thus that such creations are to be viewed; but by the light which enables us to see why the country squires, village schoolmasters, and hedge parsons of Fielding became immortal. The later ones will live, as the earlier do, by the subtle quality of genius that makes their doings and sayings part of those general incentives which pervade mankind. Who has not had occasion, however priding himself on his unlikeness to Micawber, to think of Micawber as he reviewed his own experiences? Who has not himself waited, like Micawber, for something to turn up? Who has not at times discovered, in one or other acquaintance or friend, some one or[349] other of that cluster of sagacious hints and fragments of human life and conduct which the kindly fancy of Dickens embodied in this delightful form? If the irrepressible New Zealander ever comes over to achieve his long promised sketch of St. Paul's, who can doubt that it will be no other than our undying Micawber, who had taken to colonisation the last time we saw him, and who will thus again have turned up? There are not many conditions of life or society to which his and his wife's experiences are not applicable; and when, the year after the immortal couple made their first appearance on earth, Protection was in one of its then frequent difficulties, declaring it could not live without something widely different from existing circumstances shortly turning up, and imploring its friends to throw down the gauntlet and boldly challenge society to turn up a majority and rescue it from its embarrassments, a distinguished wit seized upon the likeness to Micawber, showed how closely it was borne out by the jollity and gin-punch of the banquets at which the bewailings were heard, and asked whether Dickens had stolen from the farmer's friends or the farmer's friends had stolen from Dickens. "Corn, said Mr. Micawber, may be gentlemanly, but it is not remunerative. . . . I ask myself this question: if corn is not to be relied on, what is? We must live. . . ." Loud as the general laughter was, I think the laughter of Dickens himself was loudest, at this discovery of so exact and unexpected a likeness.[265]
To the special observations already made on the series of stories that followed the return from America, Chuzzlewit, Dombey, Copperfield, and Bleak House, where attention has been drawn to the higher purpose and more imaginative approach that set them apart,[264] a general remark should be added. Although the range of characters they cover isn’t extensive, it’s surrounded by a creativity and depth of illustration that’s unmatched in any previous novelist; and it’s illustrated in these books, so to speak, by a range of lives that feel real enough to be part of the actual world. Could any other top writer pull together half as many well-known and recognizable characters from a single story as one can readily recall from Dickens’ masterpieces? It’s so hard to argue against this that most would probably agree; however, if the response comes from a critic of the group mocked by Mr. Lewes, they might say that these characters aren’t really individual or special people but more like general representations of men and women, abstract types made up of memorable catchphrases or surface traits, even though they’re layered with a rich wealth of humorous illustration that’s filled with a detailed and accurate understanding of life, which hides the true simplicity of character. What can we say in response to this, except that the richness or poverty of any field worth examining usually depends on the kind of observation that’s applied to it? There was no better observer of the customs of his time than Johnson, who claimed that their greatest chronicler only understood the surface of life. Another of his remarks, often echoed by Dickens’ critics, places Fielding below one of his famous contemporaries; but who wouldn’t now want to reverse that comparison, considering that Fielding correctly tells you what time it is by looking at the clock face, while Richardson shows you how the watch is made? There was never a sharper or more insightful observer than Fielding, who truly deserved the generous praise given to him by Smollett for painting the characters and mocking the follies of life with equal strength, humor, and appropriateness. But might it not be said of him, just as with Dickens, that his range of characters was narrow? And that his approach of moving from a central idea for all his main characters made him equally susceptible to the critique that he sometimes substituted human nature for individuals who should only represent a small part of it? This is simply another way of saying what I mentioned earlier, that what a character, skillfully drawn by a master, often presents on the surface can frequently satisfy deeper requirements; and that when only the prominent points or sharper features are highlighted, the great novelist is exercising his undeniable right to show how much human interaction is driven not by people’s behaviors at their most ordinary, but through the extremes they experience. A characterization of Fielding’s genius has been made somewhat accurately in the observation that he illustrates common tendencies alongside the raw details unique to individuals, and no one could aim for or desire a more exquisite handling than this; but it would be just as easy, using the critical standards applied to Dickens, to turn that into a point of criticism. Partridge, Adams, Trulliber, Squire Western, and others often present themselves in similar ways and frequently use the same catchphrases enough to be accused of mannerism; and while M. Taine can’t fairly claim about Fielding, as he does with Dickens, that he suffers from excessive morality, he levels against him exactly the criticism strongly directed at the later novelist for “viewing passions not as simple forces but as objects of approval or blame.” We need to keep all of this in mind to understand the value of a lackluster imagination, which can find in a portrayal like Micawber’s just the man described by Mr. Lewes as always in the same situation, driven by the same motivations and saying the same things, forever hopeful that something will come through, always defeated and bouncing back, always making punch, and his wife constantly insisting she will never leave him. That’s not how we should view such creations; rather, we should consider the insights that help us understand why the country squires, village schoolmasters, and hedge priests of Fielding became immortal. The later characters will endure, just as the earlier ones do, because of the subtle quality of genius that makes their actions and words part of the universal motivations that influence humanity. Who hasn’t found, even while taking pride in not being like Micawber, that he recalled Micawber when reflecting on his own experiences? Who hasn’t waited like Micawber for something to happen? Who hasn’t sometimes recognized, in a friend or acquaintance, some part of that cluster of insightful hints and aspects of human life and behavior that Dickens’ warm imagination brought to life in this charming manner? If the indefatigable New Zealander ever comes over to do his long-promised sketch of St. Paul’s, who would doubt that it’ll be our everlasting Micawber, who had taken to colonization the last time we saw him, and who will therefore have turned up again? There aren’t many life conditions or societal situations to which he and his wife’s experiences don’t apply; and when, the year after the iconic couple first appeared on earth, Protection was facing one of its common troubles, claiming it couldn’t survive without something drastically different from the current situation turning up, and urging its allies to challenge society to produce a majority and save it from its troubles, a clever wit pointed out the resemblance to Micawber, demonstrating how closely it was echoed in the cheer and gin punch of the banquets where the laments were expressed, and questioned whether Dickens had borrowed from the farmers’ friends or vice versa. “Corn,” Mr. Micawber said, “may be gentlemanly, but it is not profitable.... I ask myself this question: if corn is not reliable, what is? We must live...” While the general laughter was loud, I believe Dickens himself laughed the hardest at this exact and unexpected resemblance.[265]
A readiness in all forms thus to enjoy his own pleasantry was indeed always observable (it is common to great humourists, nor would it be easier to carry it farther than Sterne did), and his own confession on the point may receive additional illustration before proceeding to the later books. He accounted by it, as we have seen, for occasional even grotesque extravagances. In another of his letters there is this passage: "I can report that I have finished the job I set myself, and that it has in it something—to me at all events—so extraordinarily droll, that though I have been reading it some hundred times in the course of the working, I[351] have never been able to look at it with the least composure, but have always roared in the most unblushing manner. I leave you to find out what it was." It was the encounter of the major and the tax-collector in the second Mrs. Lirriper. Writing previously of the papers in Household Words called The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices, after saying that he and Mr. Wilkie Collins had written together a story in the second part, "in which I think you would find it very difficult to say where I leave off and he comes in," he had said of the preceding descriptions: "Some of my own tickle me very much; but that may be in great part because I know the originals, and delight in their fantastic fidelity." "I have been at work with such a will" he writes later of a piece of humour for the holidays, "that I have done the opening and conclusion of the Christmas number. They are done in the character of a waiter, and I think are exceedingly droll. The thread on which the stories are to hang, is spun by this waiter, and is, purposely, very slight; but has, I fancy, a ridiculously comical and unexpected end. The waiter's account of himself includes (I hope) everything you know about waiters, presented humorously." In this last we have a hint of the "fantastic fidelity" with which, when a fancy "tickled" him, he would bring out what Corporal Nym calls the humour of it under so astonishing a variety of conceivable and inconceivable aspects of subtle exaggeration, that nothing was left to the subject but that special individual illustration of it. In this, however, humour was not his servant but his master; because it reproduced too readily, and carried too far, the grotesque imaginings to[352] which great humourists are prone; which lie indeed deep in their nature; and from which they derive their genial sympathy with eccentric characters that enables them to find motives for what to other men is hopelessly obscure, to exalt into types of humanity what the world turns impatiently aside at, and to enshrine in a form for eternal homage and love such whimsical absurdity as Captain Toby Shandy's. But Dickens was too conscious of these excesses from time to time, not zealously to endeavour to keep the leading characters in his more important stories under some strictness of discipline. To confine exaggeration within legitimate limits was an art he laboriously studied; and, in whatever proportions of failure or success, during the vicissitudes of both that attended his later years, he continued to endeavour to practise it. In regard to mere description, it is true, he let himself loose more frequently, and would sometimes defend it even on the ground of art; nor would it be fair to omit his reply, on one occasion, to some such remonstrance as M. Taine has embodied in his adverse criticism, against the too great imaginative wealth thrown by him into mere narrative.[353][266] "It does not seem to me to be enough to say of any description that it is the exact truth. The exact truth must be there; but the merit or art in the narrator, is the manner of stating the truth. As to which thing in literature, it always seems to me that there is a world to be done. And in these times, when the tendency is to be frightfully literal and catalogue-like—to make the thing, in short, a sort of sum in reduction that any miserable creature can do in that way—I have an idea (really founded on the love of what I profess), that the very holding of popular literature through a kind of popular dark age, may depend on such fanciful treatment."
A constant readiness to enjoy his own humor was always noticeable (common among great humorists, and few took it as far as Sterne did), and his own admission on this point can be further illustrated before moving on to the later books. He attributed it, as we’ve seen, to occasional, even bizarre extravagances. In another of his letters, he wrote: "I can report that I’ve finished the job I set for myself, and there’s something—at least for me—so incredibly funny in it that, even after reading it hundreds of times while working on it, I’ve never been able to look at it without bursting out laughing. I’ll leave it to you to find out what it was." It was the encounter between the major and the tax collector in the second Mrs. Lirriper. Earlier, when discussing the pieces in Household Words titled The Lazy Tour of Two Idle Apprentices, after stating that he and Mr. Wilkie Collins wrote a story together in the second part, "in which I think you’d find it hard to say where I end and he begins," he remarked on the earlier descriptions: "Some of my own tickle me a lot; but that’s probably because I know the originals and enjoy their whimsical accuracy." "I’ve put so much effort into this," he later wrote about a humorous piece for the holidays, "that I’ve completed the opening and conclusion of the Christmas number. They’re written from the perspective of a waiter, and I think they’re really funny. The thread that the stories hang on is spun by this waiter and is, purposefully, very thin; but I believe it has a ridiculously funny and unexpected end. The waiter’s account of himself includes (I hope) everything you know about waiters, presented humorously." In this last part, we get a hint of the "fantastic accuracy" with which, when something amused him, he would illustrate what Corporal Nym calls the humor of it under an astonishing variety of possible and impossible aspects of subtle exaggeration, leaving little but that specific individual illustration of it. However, in this case, humor was not his servant but his master; because it reproduced too easily, and took too far, the bizarre imaginings to which great humorists are prone; which indeed lie deep in their nature; and from which they derive their genuine sympathy with eccentric characters that allows them to find reasons for what to others is hopelessly unclear, to elevate what the world impatiently dismisses into types of human experience, and to immortalize such whimsical absurdity as Captain Toby Shandy's in a form worthy of eternal admiration and love. Yet Dickens was too aware of these excesses at times to not make a dedicated effort to keep the main characters in his more significant stories under some strict discipline. Confining exaggeration to acceptable limits was a skill he diligently practiced; and, regardless of his successes or failures during the ups and downs of his later years, he continued to strive to apply it. Regarding mere description, it’s true that he often let himself go more freely, sometimes even justifying it as a matter of art; and it wouldn’t be fair to omit his response, on one occasion, to a criticism like that expressed by M. Taine against the excessive imaginative detail he put into simple narrative.[353][266] "It doesn’t seem enough to say of any description that it’s the exact truth. The exact truth must be present; but the skill or artistry in the narrator is in how the truth is stated. Regarding this aspect in literature, it always seems to me that there’s still much to be done. And in these times, when the tendency is to be painfully literal and catalog-like—to make it, in essence, a type of simple sum that anyone can replicate—I believe (based on my genuine love for what I do) that popular literature surviving through a kind of public dark age may depend on such imaginative treatment."
THE TALE OF TWO CITIES.
Dickens's next story to Little Dorrit was the Tale of Two Cities, of which the first notion occurred to him while acting with his friends and his children in the summer of 1857 in Mr. Wilkie Collins's drama of The Frozen Deep. But it was only a vague fancy, and the sadness and trouble of the winter of that year were not favourable to it. Towards the close (27th) of January 1858, talking of improvements at Gadshill in which he took little interest, it was again in his thoughts. "Growing inclinations of a fitful and undefined sort are upon me sometimes to fall to work on a new book. Then I think I had better not worry my worried mind yet awhile. Then I think it would be of no use if I did, for I couldn't settle to one occupation.—And that's all!" "If I can discipline my thoughts," he wrote three days later, "into the channel of a story, I have made up my mind to get to work on one: always supposing that I find myself, on the trial, able to do well. Nothing whatever will do me the least 'good' in the way of shaking the one strong possession of change impending over us that every day makes stronger; but if I could work on with some approach to steadiness, through the summer, the anxious toil of a new book would have its neck well broken before beginning to publish, next October or November. Sometimes, I think I may continue to work; sometimes, I think not. What do you say to the title, One of these DAYS?" That title held its ground very briefly. "What do you think," he wrote after six weeks, "of this name for my story—Buried Alive? Does it seem too grim? Or,[355] The Thread of Gold? Or, The Doctor of Beauvais?" But not until twelve months later did he fairly buckle himself to the task he had contemplated so long. All the Year Round had taken the place of Household Words in the interval; and the tale was then started to give strength to the new weekly periodical for whose pages it was designed.
Dickens's next story after Little Dorrit was A Tale of Two Cities, which first came to him while he was acting with friends and his kids during the summer of 1857 in Mr. Wilkie Collins's play The Frozen Deep. However, it was just a vague idea, and the sadness and difficulties of that winter didn’t help. Towards the end of January 1858, while discussing improvements at Gadshill that he wasn't very interested in, the idea crossed his mind again. "Sometimes I have these fleeting and unclear urges to start working on a new book. Then I think I shouldn’t stress my already stressed mind yet. But then I think it wouldn’t help because I can’t focus on just one thing. And that’s it!” "If I can direct my thoughts," he wrote three days later, "into the flow of a story, I’ve decided I’ll get started on one—assuming I can actually do it well when I try. Nothing will really ease the heavy burden of change that looms over us and grows stronger every day; but if I could work steadily, through the summer, the anxious effort of a new book would be well on its way before I start to publish, next October or November. Sometimes I think I can keep working; sometimes I think I can't. What do you think of the title, One of these days?" That title didn’t last long. "What do you think," he wrote after six weeks, "of this title for my story—Buried Alive? Does it sound too dark? Or, [355] The Gold Thread? Or, The Doctor of Beauvais?" But it wasn't until a whole year later that he finally got serious about the task he had been considering for so long. All the Year Round had taken the place of Household Words in the meantime; and the story was then begun to strengthen the new weekly magazine that it was meant for.
"This is merely to certify," he wrote on the 11th of March 1859, "that I have got exactly the name for the story that is wanted; exactly what will fit the opening to a T. A Tale of Two Cities. Also, that I have struck out a rather original and bold idea. That is, at the end of each month to publish the monthly part in the green cover, with the two illustrations, at the old shilling. This will give All the Year Round always the interest and precedence of a fresh weekly portion during the month; and will give me my old standing with my old public, and the advantage (very necessary in this story) of having numbers of people who read it in no portions smaller than a monthly part. . . . My American ambassador pays a thousand pounds for the first year, for the privilege of republishing in America one day after we publish here. Not bad?" . . . He had to struggle at the opening through a sharp attack of illness, and on the 9th of July progress was thus reported. "I have been getting on in health very slowly and through irksome botheration enough. But I think I am round the corner. This cause—and the heat—has tended to my doing no more than hold my ground, my old month's advance, with the Tale of Two Cities. The small portions thereof, drive me frantic; but I think the tale must have taken a strong hold. The run[356] upon our monthly parts is surprising, and last month we sold 35,000 back numbers. A note I have had from Carlyle about it has given me especial pleasure." A letter of the following month expresses the intention he had when he began the story, and in what respect it differs as to method from all his other books. Sending in proof four numbers ahead of the current publication, he adds: "I hope you will like them. Nothing but the interest of the subject, and the pleasure of striving with the difficulty of the form of treatment,—nothing in the way of mere money, I mean,—could else repay the time and trouble of the incessant condensation. But I set myself the little task of making a picturesque story, rising in every chapter, with characters true to nature, but whom the story should express more than they should express themselves by dialogue. I mean in other words, that I fancied a story of incident might be written (in place of the odious stuff that is written under that pretence), pounding the characters in its own mortar, and beating their interest out of them. If you could have read the story all at once, I hope you wouldn't have stopped halfway."[267] Another of his letters[357] supplies the last illustration I need to give of the design and meanings in regard to this tale expressed by himself. It was a reply to some objections of which the principal were, a doubt if the feudal cruelties came sufficiently within the date of the action to justify his use of them, and some question as to the manner of disposing of the chief revolutionary agent in the plot. "I had of course full knowledge of the formal surrender of the feudal privileges, but these had been bitterly felt quite as near to the time of the Revolution as the Doctor's narrative, which you will remember dates long before the Terror. With the slang of the new philosophy on the one side, it was surely not unreasonable or unallowable, on the other, to suppose a nobleman wedded to the old cruel ideas, and representing the time going out as his nephew represents the time coming in. If there be anything certain on earth, I take it that the condition of the French peasant generally at that day was intolerable. No later enquiries or provings by figures will hold water against the tremendous testimony of men living at the time. There is a curious book printed at Amsterdam, written to make out no[358] case whatever, and tiresome enough in its literal dictionary-like minuteness; scattered up and down the pages of which is full authority for my marquis. This is Mercier's Tableau de Paris. Rousseau is the authority for the peasant's shutting up his house when he had a bit of meat. The tax-tables are the authority for the wretched creature's impoverishment. . . . I am not clear, and I never have been clear, respecting the canon of fiction which forbids the interposition of accident in such a case as Madame Defarge's death. Where the accident is inseparable from the passion and action of the character; where it is strictly consistent with the entire design, and arises out of some culminating proceeding on the part of the individual which the whole story has led up to; it seems to me to become, as it were, an act of divine justice. And when I use Miss Pross (though this is quite another question) to bring about such a catastrophe, I have the positive intention of making that half-comic intervention a part of the desperate woman's failure; and of opposing that mean death, instead of a desperate one in the streets which she wouldn't have minded, to the dignity of Carton's. Wrong or right, this was all design, and seemed to me to be in the fitness of things."
"This is just to confirm," he wrote on March 11, 1859, "that I've got exactly the right name for the story that’s needed; it fits the opening perfectly: A Tale of Two Cities. Also, I've come up with a pretty original and bold idea. That is, at the end of each month, I’ll publish the monthly part with a green cover, along with two illustrations, for the old shilling price. This will give All the Year Round the ongoing interest and lead of a new weekly portion throughout the month; and it’ll help me reconnect with my old audience, and provide the crucial advantage (very necessary for this story) of reaching people who prefer not to read it in smaller pieces than a monthly part. . . . My American partner pays a thousand pounds for the first year for the right to republish in America one day after we release it here. Not bad? . . . I had to deal with a tough health issue at the start, and on July 9, I reported my progress. “I’ve been slowly recovering, but it’s been really frustrating. However, I think I’m starting to feel better. Because of my health and the heat, I’ve pretty much just managed to maintain my old monthly progress with A Tale of Two Cities. The small portions drive me crazy, but I think the story has really taken hold. The demand for our monthly parts is surprising, and last month we sold 35,000 back issues. A note I received from Carlyle about it made me especially happy." A letter from the next month expresses his initial intentions when he began the story, and how it differs in method from all his previous works. Sending in proofs four issues ahead of the current publication, he adds: "I hope you will enjoy them. Only the interest of the subject and the challenge of figuring out the treatment form—which isn’t about money—could make the time and effort of constant condensation worthwhile. But I took on the small task of creating a picturesque story, progressing with every chapter, with characters true to life, but whose actions should convey more than their words in dialogue. In other words, I imagined writing a story based on events instead of the boring stuff that is typically called that, shaping the characters in my own way and drawing their interest from them. If you could have read the story all at once, I hope you wouldn’t have stopped halfway." [267] Another one of his letters[357] provides the last bit of illustration I need to share about the design and meanings regarding this tale as expressed by him. It was a response to some objections, including a doubt about whether the feudal cruelties fit within the timeframe of the story to justify his use of them, and a question about how the main revolutionary agent in the plot was handled. "I was well aware of the formal abolition of feudal privileges, but these had been deeply felt pretty much as close to the time of the Revolution as the Doctor’s narrative, which you’ll remember is set long before the Terror. With the slang of the new philosophy on one side, it surely wasn’t unreasonable or inappropriate, on the other, to assume a nobleman attached to the old cruel ways, representing the time going out as his nephew represents the time coming in. If there’s anything certain on this earth, it’s that the condition of the French peasant at that time was unbearable. No later inquiries or figures can hold up against the overwhelming testimony of people who lived through it. There’s a strange book published in Amsterdam, written without any particular agenda and painfully detailed, which provides ample evidence for my marquis. This is Mercier's Tableau de Paris. Rousseau is the source for the peasant shutting himself in his house when he had a bit of meat. The tax records confirm the miserable state of the poor. . . . I’m not sure, and I’ve never been clear, about the rule in fiction that prohibits the use of accident in something like Madame Defarge’s death. When the accident is tied to the character's passion and actions; when it aligns perfectly with the overall design and arises from some significant action by the character that the whole story has been leading up to; it seems to me that it becomes, in a sense, an act of divine justice. And when I use Miss Pross (though that’s a separate question) to bring about such a disaster, I intend that half-comic intervention to be part of the desperate woman's failure; contrasting that lowly death, instead of one she wouldn't have minded in the streets, with Carton's dignified end. Whether right or wrong, this was all intentional and felt appropriate."
These are interesting intimations of the care with which Dickens worked; and there is no instance in his novels, excepting this, of a deliberate and planned departure from the method of treatment which had been pre-eminently the source of his popularity as a novelist. To rely less upon character than upon incident, and to resolve that his actors should be expressed by the story more than they should express themselves[359] by dialogue, was for him a hazardous, and can hardly be called an entirely successful, experiment. With singular dramatic vivacity, much constructive art, and with descriptive passages of a high order everywhere (the dawn of the terrible outbreak in the journey of the marquis from Paris to his country seat, and the London crowd at the funeral of the spy, may be instanced for their power), there was probably never a book by a great humourist, and an artist so prolific in the conception of character, with so little humour and so few rememberable figures. Its merits lie elsewhere. Though there are excellent traits and touches all through the revolutionary scenes, the only full-length that stands out prominently is the picture of the wasted life saved at last by heroic sacrifice. Dickens speaks of his design to make impressive the dignity of Carton's death, and in this he succeeded perhaps even beyond his expectation. Carton suffers himself to be mistaken for another, and gives his life that the girl he loves may be happy with that other; the secret being known only to a poor little girl in the tumbril that takes them to the scaffold, who at the moment has discovered it, and whom it strengthens also to die. The incident is beautifully told; and it is at least only fair to set against verdicts not very favourable as to this effort of his invention, what was said of the particular character and scene, and of the book generally, by an American critic whose literary studies had most familiarized him with the rarest forms of imaginative writing.[268] "Its pourtrayal of the noble-natured castaway[360] makes it almost a peerless book in modern literature, and gives it a place among the highest examples of literary art. . . . The conception of this character shows in its author an ideal of magnanimity and of charity unsurpassed. There is not a grander, lovelier figure than the self-wrecked, self-devoted Sydney Carton, in literature or history; and the story itself is so noble in its spirit, so grand and graphic in its style, and filled with a pathos so profound and simple, that it deserves and will surely take a place among the great serious works of imagination." I should myself prefer to say that its distinctive merit is less in any of its conceptions of character, even Carton's, than as a specimen of Dickens's power in imaginative story-telling. There is no piece of fiction known to me, in which the domestic life of a few simple private people is in such a manner knitted and interwoven with the outbreak of a terrible public event, that the one seems but part of the other. When made conscious of the first sultry drops of a thunderstorm that fall upon a little group sitting in an obscure English lodging, we are witness to the actual beginning of a tempest which is preparing to sweep away everything in France. And, to the end, the book in this respect is really remarkable.
These are fascinating hints about the care Dickens put into his work; and there’s no other example in his novels, apart from this one, of a conscious and planned shift away from the approach that had primarily made him popular as a novelist. He chose to focus less on character and more on incidents, deciding that his characters should be revealed through the story rather than through dialogue. This was a risky move for him and can hardly be called completely successful. With striking dramatic energy, considerable skill in construction, and impressive descriptive writing throughout (like the ominous early signs during the marquis's journey from Paris to his estate and the London crowd at the spy's funeral), there has probably never been a book by a great humorist, an artist so skilled in character creation, that features so little humor and so few memorable characters. Its strengths lie elsewhere. Although there are great moments and details throughout the revolutionary scenes, the only fully realized character that stands out is the portrayal of a wasted life redeemed by self-sacrifice. Dickens aimed to highlight the dignity of Carton's death, and he likely succeeded even beyond his hopes. Carton allows himself to be mistaken for someone else and sacrifices his life so that the girl he loves can be happy with that other man; only a poor little girl in the cart headed to the scaffold knows the truth, and understanding it gives her courage to face her own death. The incident is beautifully narrated; and it is only fair to weigh any unfavorable opinions about this creative effort against what was said by an American critic whose literary studies had deeply acquainted him with the rarest forms of imaginative writing. “Its portrayal of the noble-natured castaway makes it nearly unmatched in modern literature and places it among the highest examples of literary art. The idea of this character shows in its author an ideal of generosity and kindness that is unsurpassed. There is no grander, lovelier figure than the self-destroyed, self-sacrificing Sydney Carton, in literature or history; and the story itself is so noble in spirit, so grand and vivid in style, and filled with such deep and simple pathos that it deserves and will surely earn a spot among the great serious works of imagination.” I would personally argue that its unique value lies less in any of its character ideas, even Carton's, and more as an example of Dickens's ability in imaginative storytelling. There is no piece of fiction I know of where the everyday lives of a few ordinary people are so tightly woven with the onset of a horrific public event that one feels like part of the other. When we feel the first sweltering drops of a thunderstorm falling on a small group sitting in a humble English lodging, we are witnessing the true start of a tempest that is about to devastate everything in France. And, throughout, the book is truly remarkable in this regard.
GREAT EXPECTATIONS.
The Tale of Two Cities was published in 1859; the series of papers collected as the Uncommercial Traveller were occupying Dickens in 1860; and it was while engaged in these, and throwing off in the course of them[361] capital "samples" of fun and enjoyment, he thus replied to a suggestion that he should let himself loose upon some single humorous conception, in the vein of his youthful achievements in that way. "For a little piece I have been writing—or am writing; for I hope to finish it to-day—such a very fine, new, and grotesque idea has opened upon me, that I begin to doubt whether I had not better cancel the little paper, and reserve the notion for a new book. You shall judge as soon as I get it printed. But it so opens out before me that I can see the whole of a serial revolving on it, in a most singular and comic manner." This was the germ of Pip and Magwitch, which at first he intended to make the groundwork of a tale in the old twenty-number form, but for reasons perhaps fortunate brought afterwards within the limits of a less elaborate novel. "Last week," he wrote on the 4th of October 1860, "I got to work on the new story. I had previously very carefully considered the state and prospects of All the Year Round, and, the more I considered them, the less hope I saw of being able to get back, now, to the profit of a separate publication in the old 20 numbers." (A tale, which at the time was appearing in his serial, had disappointed expectation.) "However I worked on, knowing that what I was doing would run into another groove; and I called a council of war at the office on Tuesday. It was perfectly clear that the one thing to be done was, for me to strike in. I have therefore decided to begin the story as of the length of the Tale of Two Cities on the first of December—begin publishing, that is. I must make the most I can out of the book. You shall have the first two or three weekly[362] parts to-morrow. The name is Great Expectations. I think a good name?" Two days later he wrote: "The sacrifice of Great Expectations is really and truly made for myself. The property of All the Year Round is far too valuable, in every way, to be much endangered. Our fall is not large, but we have a considerable advance in hand of the story we are now publishing, and there is no vitality in it, and no chance whatever of stopping the fall; which on the contrary would be certain to increase. Now, if I went into a twenty-number serial, I should cut off my power of doing anything serial here for two good years—and that would be a most perilous thing. On the other hand, by dashing in now, I come in when most wanted; and if Reade and Wilkie follow me, our course will be shaped out handsomely and hopefully for between two and three years. A thousand pounds are to be paid for early proofs of the story to America." A few more days brought the first instalment of the tale, and explanatory mention of it. "The book will be written in the first person throughout, and during these first three weekly numbers you will find the hero to be a boy-child, like David. Then he will be an apprentice. You will not have to complain of the want of humour as in the Tale of Two Cities. I have made the opening, I hope, in its general effect exceedingly droll. I have put a child and a good-natured foolish man, in relations that seem to me very funny. Of course I have got in the pivot on which the story will turn too—and which indeed, as you remember, was the grotesque tragi-comic conception that first encouraged me. To be quite sure I had fallen into no unconscious repetitions,[363] I read David Copperfield again the other day, and was affected by it to a degree you would hardly believe."
The Tale of Two Cities was published in 1859; the collection of papers known as the Uncommercial Traveller kept Dickens busy in 1860. While he was working on these, and producing some great "samples" of fun and enjoyment, he responded to a suggestion that he should focus on a single humorous concept, similar to his earlier works. "I've been working on a short piece—or I'm currently writing it; I hope to finish it today—because a really unique and strange idea has come to me, and I'm starting to think maybe I should scrap this little paper and save the idea for a new book. You'll judge for yourself as soon as I get it printed. It unfolds so much for me that I can envision a whole series revolving around it, in a really unusual and comedic way." This was the spark for Pip and Magwitch, which he initially planned to develop into a story in the traditional twenty-issue format, but for reasons that might have been fortunate, he later condensed it into a less complex novel. "Last week," he wrote on October 4, 1860, "I started working on the new story. I had previously thought carefully about the state and future of All the Year Round, and the more I pondered, the less hope I had of returning, now, to the profitability of a separate publication in the old twenty issues." (A tale that was currently running in his serial had not met expectations.) "Nevertheless, I continued working, knowing that what I was doing would transition into a different path; and I convened a meeting at the office on Tuesday. It was clear that the only option was for me to jump in. I've decided to start the story, aiming for the length of the Tale of Two Cities, on December first—meaning I'll begin publishing then. I need to make the most out of the book. You'll have the first two or three weekly[362] parts tomorrow. The title is High Hopes. I think it's a good title?" Two days later, he wrote: "The sacrifice of Great Expectations is truly and genuinely for my own sake. The value of All the Year Round is way too significant to be put at much risk. Our decline isn't large, but we have a decent advance on the story we're currently publishing, and it's lacking vitality, with no chance of halting the decline; in fact, it's likely to worsen. Now, if I went into a twenty-issue series, I'd cut off my ability to do anything in serial form here for two full years—and that would be quite risky. On the flip side, by jumping in now, I'm coming in when it's most needed; and if Reade and Wilkie follow me, we can shape a promising path for the next two to three years. A thousand pounds will be paid for early proofs of the story in America." A few more days brought the first installment of the tale, along with an explanation. "The book will be written entirely in the first person, and during these first three weekly numbers, you'll find the hero is a child, like David. Then he'll become an apprentice. You won't be disappointed by the lack of humor as in the Tale of Two Cities. I've crafted the opening to be, I hope, very amusing. I've placed a child and a good-natured, foolish man in situations that I find very funny. Of course, I've included the pivotal moment on which the story will turn—and which, as you remember, was the bizarre tragicomic idea that first inspired me. To make sure I hadn’t unconsciously repeated anything,[363] I reread David Copperfield the other day, and it affected me in a way you'd hardly believe."
It may be doubted if Dickens could better have established his right to the front rank among novelists claimed for him, than by the ease and mastery with which, in these two books of Copperfield and Great Expectations, he kept perfectly distinct the two stories of a boy's childhood, both told in the form of autobiography. A subtle penetration into character marks the unlikeness in the likeness; there is enough at once of resemblance and of difference in the position and surroundings of each to account for the divergences of character that arise; both children are good-hearted, and both have the advantage of association with models of tender simplicity and oddity, perfect in their truth and quite distinct from each other; but a sudden tumble into distress steadies Peggotty's little friend, and as unexpected a stroke of good fortune turns the head of the small protégé of Joe Gargery. What a deal of spoiling nevertheless, a nature that is really good at the bottom of it will stand without permanent damage, is nicely shown in Pip; and the way he reconciles his determination to act very shabbily to his early friends, with a conceited notion that he is setting them a moral example, is part of the shading of a character drawn with extraordinary skill. His greatest trial comes out of his good luck; and the foundations of both are laid at the opening of the tale, in a churchyard down by the Thames, as it winds past desolate marshes twenty miles to the sea, of which a masterly picture in half a dozen lines will give only average example of the descriptive[364] writing that is everywhere one of the charms of the book. It is strange, as I transcribe the words, with what wonderful vividness they bring back the very spot on which we stood when he said he meant to make it the scene of the opening of his story—Cooling Castle ruins and the desolate Church, lying out among the marshes seven miles from Gadshill! "My first most vivid and broad impression . . . on a memorable raw afternoon towards evening . . . was . . . that this bleak place, overgrown with nettles, was the churchyard, and that the dark flat wilderness beyond the churchyard, intersected with dykes and mounds and gates, with scattered cattle feeding on it, was the marshes; and that the low leaden line beyond, was the river; and that the distant savage lair from which the wind was rushing, was the sea. . . . On the edge of the river . . . only two black things in all the prospect seemed to be standing upright . . . one, the beacon by which the sailors steered, like an unhooped cask upon a pole, an ugly thing when you were near it; the other, a gibbet with some chains hanging to it which had once held a pirate." Here Magwitch, an escaped convict from Chatham, terrifies the child Pip into stealing for him food and a file; and though recaptured and transported, he carries with him to Australia such a grateful heart for the small creature's service, that on making a fortune there he resolves to make his little friend a gentleman. This requires circumspection; and is so done, through the Old-Bailey attorney who has defended Magwitch at his trial (a character of surprising novelty and truth), that Pip imagines his present gifts and "great expectations" to have come from the supposed[365] rich lady of the story (whose eccentricities are the unattractive part of it, and have yet a weird character that somehow fits in with the kind of wrong she has suffered). When therefore the closing scenes bring back Magwitch himself, who risks his life to gratify his longing to see the gentleman he has made, it is an unspeakable horror to the youth to discover his benefactor in the convicted felon. If any one doubts Dickens's power of so drawing a character as to get to the heart of it, seeing beyond surface peculiarities into the moving springs of the human being himself, let him narrowly examine those scenes. There is not a grain of substitution of mere sentiment, or circumstance, for the inner and absolute reality of the position in which these two creatures find themselves. Pip's loathing of what had built up his fortune, and his horror of the uncouth architect, are apparent in even his most generous efforts to protect him from exposure and sentence. Magwitch's convict habits strangely blend themselves with his wild pride in, and love for, the youth whom his money has turned into a gentleman. He has a craving for his good opinion; dreads to offend him by his "heavy grubbing," or by the oaths he lets fall now and then; and pathetically hopes his Pip, his dear boy, won't think him "low": but, upon a chum of Pip's appearing unexpectedly while they are together, he pulls out a jack-knife by way of hint he can defend himself, and produces afterwards a greasy little clasped black Testament on which the startled new-comer, being found to have no hostile intention, is sworn to secrecy. At the opening of the story there had been an exciting scene of[366] the wretched man's chase and recapture among the marshes, and this has its parallel at the close in his chase and recapture on the river while poor Pip is helping to get him off. To make himself sure of the actual course of a boat in such circumstances, and what possible incidents the adventure might have, Dickens hired a steamer for the day from Blackwall to Southend. Eight or nine friends and three or four members of his family were on board, and he seemed to have no care, the whole of that summer day (22nd of May 1861), except to enjoy their enjoyment and entertain them with his own in shape of a thousand whims and fancies; but his sleepless observation was at work all the time, and nothing had escaped his keen vision on either side of the river. The fifteenth chapter of the third volume is a masterpiece.
It’s debatable whether Dickens could have better proven his place among the top novelists than through the skill and ease with which he distinctly portrayed the childhood stories of a boy in these two books, Copperfield and Great Expectations, both written as autobiographies. A keen insight into character highlights the similarity in their differences; both children share enough in common to explain the variations in their personalities. They are both kind-hearted and benefit from relationships with examples of gentle simplicity and eccentricity, each authentic and quite different from the other. However, a sudden fall into hardship strengthens Peggotty's little friend, while an unexpected stroke of luck goes to the head of Joe Gargery's small protégé. Despite considerable spoiling, a fundamentally good nature can endure without lasting harm, as shown in Pip; the way he justifies acting poorly towards his early friends while believing he is setting them a moral example reveals the complexity of a character drawn with remarkable skill. His biggest challenge comes from his success. The foundations of both his luck and trials are established at the start of the story in a graveyard by the Thames, as it winds through desolate marshes towards the sea, which is depicted masterfully in just a few lines—an ordinary example of the descriptive writing that adds to the book's charm. It’s strange how vividly the words conjure the exact spot where he said he planned to start his story—Cooling Castle ruins and the lonely church, situated among the marshes seven miles from Gadshill! "My first vivid and broad impression... on a memorable, chilly afternoon towards evening... was... that this bleak place, overrun with nettles, was the churchyard, and that the dark, flat wilderness beyond it, crisscrossed with dykes and mounds and gates, with scattered cattle grazing, was the marshes; and that the low, leaden line beyond was the river; and that the distant wild lair from which the wind was rushing was the sea... On the edge of the river... two black objects were the only things standing upright... one, the beacon for sailors, resembling an unhooped cask on a pole, an unattractive sight up close; the other, a gallows with chains that once held a pirate." Here, Magwitch, an escaped convict from Chatham, terrifies young Pip into stealing food and a file for him; even after being recaptured and sent away, he carries a deep gratitude for Pip's assistance, leading him to resolve to make his little friend a gentleman once he makes his fortune in Australia. This requires careful planning, which is executed through the Old Bailey lawyer who defended Magwitch (a surprisingly fresh and realistic character), leading Pip to believe his current wealth and "great expectations" come from the supposed rich lady in the story (whose oddities are the less appealing aspect but strangely align with the wrongs she has faced). Therefore, when the story's ending brings Magwitch back, risking his life to fulfill his desire to see the gentleman he created, it’s a terrifying revelation for Pip to find his benefactor is a convicted felon. If anyone doubts Dickens's ability to draw a character so deeply that he reaches the core of it, looking beyond surface traits into the true motivations of the human experience, they should closely examine those scenes. There is no hint of mere sentiment or circumstance replacing the genuine, raw reality of the situation facing these two characters. Pip’s revulsion at what has built his fortune and his horror at the uncouth architect are evident even in his attempts to shield Magwitch from exposure and punishment. Magwitch's convict demeanor oddly mixes with his fierce pride in and affection for the young man his money has transformed into a gentleman. He craves Pip's approval, fears offending him with his "rough behavior" or his occasional swearing, and sadly hopes his Pip won't see him as "low." But when one of Pip's friends unexpectedly shows up while they are together, he brandishes a jackknife as a hint that he can defend himself and later pulls out a greasy clasped black Testament, on which the surprised newcomer, found to have no hostile intentions, is sworn to secrecy. At the beginning of the story, there was an intense scene of the wretched man's chase and recapture in the marshes, which parallels his chase and capture on the river at the close while Pip desperately tries to help him escape. To ensure he accurately depicted the path of a boat in such a scenario and the possible incidents that might occur, Dickens rented a steamer for the day from Blackwall to Southend. Eight or nine friends and three or four family members accompanied him, and he seemed to care for nothing that entire summer day (May 22, 1861) except to enjoy their enjoyment and entertain them with a thousand whims and fancies. However, his watchful observation was constant, and nothing escaped his sharp eye on either side of the river. The fifteenth chapter of the third volume is a masterpiece.
The characters generally afford the same evidence as those two that Dickens's humour, not less than his creative power, was at its best in this book. The Old-Bailey attorney Jaggers, and his clerk Wemmick (both excellent, and the last one of the oddities that live in everybody's liking for the goodheartedness of its humorous surprises), are as good as his earliest efforts in that line; the Pumblechooks and Wopsles are perfect as bits of Nickleby fresh from the mint; and the scene in which Pip, and Pip's chum Herbert, make up their accounts and schedule their debts and obligations, is original and delightful as Micawber himself. It is the art of living upon nothing and making the best of it, in the most pleasing form. Herbert's intentions to trade east and west, and get himself into business transactions of a magnificent extent and variety, are[367] as perfectly warranted to us, in his way of putting them, by merely "being in a counting-house and looking about you," as Pip's means of paying his debts are lightened and made easy by his method of simply adding them up with a margin. "The time comes," says Herbert, "when you see your opening. And you go in, and you swoop upon it, and you make your capital, and then there you are! When you have once made your capital you have nothing to do but employ it." In like manner Pip tells us "Suppose your debts to be one hundred and sixty four pounds four and two-pence, I would say, leave a margin and put them down at two hundred; or suppose them to be four times as much, leave a margin and put them down at seven hundred." He is sufficiently candid to add, that, while he has the highest opinion of the wisdom and prudence of the margin, its dangers are that in the sense of freedom and solvency it imparts there is a tendency to run into new debt. But the satire that thus enforces the old warning against living upon vague hopes, and paying ancient debts by contracting new ones, never presented itself in more amusing or kindly shape. A word should be added of the father of the girl that Herbert marries, Bill Barley, ex-ship's purser, a gouty, bed-ridden, drunken old rascal, who lies on his back in an upper floor on Mill Pond Bank by Chinks's Basin, where he keeps, weighs, and serves out the family stores or provisions, according to old professional practice, with one eye at a telescope which is fitted on his bed for the convenience of sweeping the river. This is one of those sketches, slight in itself but made rich with a wealth of comic observation, in[368] which Dickens's humour took especial delight; and to all this part of the story, there is a quaint riverside flavour that gives it amusing reality and relish.
The characters typically provide the same evidence as those two that Dickens's humor, just like his creative talent, was at its peak in this book. The Old Bailey lawyer Jaggers and his assistant Wemmick (both are fantastic, with Wemmick being one of those quirky characters everyone enjoys for his good-heartedness and humorous surprises), are as strong as his earliest works in that regard; the Pumblechooks and Wopsles are just as perfect as fresh pieces from Nickleby; and the scene where Pip and his friend Herbert sort out their finances and list their debts and responsibilities is as original and delightful as Micawber himself. It perfectly captures the art of making the most out of nothing in the most appealing way. Herbert’s plans to trade internationally and engage in grand business dealings are[367] presented to us in a way that makes total sense, simply by "being in a counting-house and looking around," just as Pip makes repaying his debts easier by just adding them up with a buffer. "The time comes," says Herbert, "when you see your chance. And then you jump in, seize it, and build your capital, and voilà! Once you’ve built your capital, all you need to do is use it." Similarly, Pip explains, "Let’s say your debts amount to one hundred sixty-four pounds, four shillings, and two pence; I would say, leave some room and round them up to two hundred; or if they were four times that amount, leave a margin and put them down at seven hundred." He’s honest enough to admit that, while he thinks highly of the wisdom and caution of having a buffer, the downside is that, in the sense of freedom and solvency it gives, there’s a risk of accumulating new debt. But the satire that emphasizes the old warning against living on vague hopes and repaying old debts by taking on new ones has never appeared in a more amusing or gentle way. A note should be made about the father of the girl Herbert marries, Bill Barley, a former ship's purser, who is a gouty, bedridden, drunken old scoundrel, lying on his back in an upstairs room on Mill Pond Bank by Chinks's Basin, where he keeps, weighs, and dispenses the family supplies or provisions, using his old professional methods, while keeping one eye on a telescope conveniently set up on his bed for checking the river. This is one of those sketches, modest in itself but enriched with a wealth of comic detail, in[368] which Dickens's humor particularly thrived; and this portion of the story carries a charming riverside feel that adds a delightful touch of reality.
Sending the chapters that contain it, which open the third division of the tale, he wrote thus: "It is a pity that the third portion cannot be read all at once, because its purpose would be much more apparent; and the pity is the greater, because the general turn and tone of the working out and winding up, will be away from all such things as they conventionally go. But what must be, must be. As to the planning out from week to week, nobody can imagine what the difficulty is, without trying. But, as in all such cases, when it is overcome the pleasure is proportionate. Two months more will see me through it, I trust. All the iron is in the fire, and I have 'only' to beat it out." One other letter throws light upon an objection taken not unfairly to the too great speed with which the heroine, after being married, reclaimed, and widowed, is in a page or two again made love to, and remarried by the hero. This summary proceeding was not originally intended. But, over and above its popular acceptance, the book had interested some whose opinions Dickens specially valued (Carlyle among them, I remember);[269] and upon Bulwer Lytton objecting to a close that should leave Pip a solitary man, Dickens substituted what now stands. "You will be surprised"[369] he wrote "to hear that I have changed the end of Great Expectations from and after Pip's return to Joe's, and finding his little likeness there. Bulwer, who has been, as I think you know, extraordinarily taken by the book, so strongly urged it upon me, after reading the proofs, and supported his view with such good reasons, that I resolved to make the change. You shall have it when you come back to town. I have put in as pretty a little piece of writing as I could, and I have no doubt the story will be more acceptable through the alteration." This turned out to be the case; but the first ending nevertheless seems to be more consistent with the drift, as well as natural working out, of the tale, and for this reason it is preserved in a note.[270]
Sending the chapters that contain it, which open the third part of the story, he wrote: "It's a shame that the third section can't be read all at once because its purpose would be much clearer. And the shame is even greater because the overall direction and tone of the story's resolution will diverge from conventional expectations. But what must happen, will happen. As for the planning out week by week, no one can truly grasp the difficulty unless they've experienced it. However, like all such challenges, when it’s overcome, the satisfaction is proportional. I expect to finish it in two more months. All the work is in progress, and I just need to refine it." Another letter sheds light on a valid concern regarding how quickly the heroine, after being married, reclaimed, and widowed, is pursued again by the hero and remarried within just a page or two. This rapid turn of events wasn’t part of the original plan. Despite this, the book was well-received and had captured the interest of some whose opinions Dickens greatly valued (including Carlyle, if I recall correctly); and in response to Bulwer Lytton's objection to an ending that would leave Pip alone, Dickens changed it to what currently stands. "You’ll be surprised," he wrote, "to hear that I've revised the ending of Great Expectations from the moment Pip returns to Joe's and sees his childhood likeness there. Bulwer, who, as you probably know, has been incredibly taken by the book, strongly encouraged me to make this change after reading the proofs and provided such compelling reasons that I decided to do it. You’ll see it when you return to town. I’ve included the best piece of writing I could, and I have no doubt the story will be more well-received because of this change." This indeed turned out to be true; however, the original ending seems more aligned with the overall direction and natural unfolding of the story, which is why it has been retained in a note.
CHRISTMAS SKETCHES.
Between that fine novel, which was issued in three volumes in the autumn of 1861, and the completion of his next serial story, were interposed three sketches in his happiest vein at which everyone laughed and cried in the Christmas times of 1862, '3, and '4. Of the waiter in Somebody's Luggage Dickens has himself spoken; and if any theme is well treated, when, from the point of view taken, nothing more is left to say about it, that bit of fun is perfect. Call it exaggeration, grotesqueness, or by what hard name you will, laughter will always intercept any graver criticism. Writing from Paris of what he was himself responsible for in the articles left by Somebody with his wonderful Waiter, he said that in one of them he had made the story a camera obscura of certain French places and styles of people; having founded it on something he had noticed in a French soldier. This was the tale of Little Bebelle, which had a small French corporal for its hero, and became highly popular. But the triumph of the Christmas achievements in these days was Mrs. Lirriper. She took her place at once among people known to everybody; and all the world talked of Major Jemmy Jackman, and his friend the poor elderly lodging-house[371] keeper of the Strand, with her miserable cares and rivalries and worries, as if they had both been as long in London and as well known as Norfolk-street itself. A dozen volumes could not have told more than those dozen pages did. The Legacy followed the Lodgings in 1864, and there was no falling off in the fun and laughter.
Between that great novel, which was published in three volumes in the fall of 1861, and the completion of his next serialized story, he released three sketches that captured his most joyful writing, making everyone laugh and cry during the Christmas seasons of 1862, '63, and '64. Dickens himself commented on the waiter in Somebody's Luggage; and if any theme is well handled, to the point where there's nothing more to say, that piece of humor is spot on. You can call it exaggeration, grotesqueness, or whatever you like—but laughter will always cut through any serious critique. Writing from Paris about what he was responsible for in the articles left by Somebody with his amazing Waiter, he mentioned that in one of them he made the story a snapshot of certain French places and people's styles, inspired by something he observed in a French soldier. This was the story of Little Bebelle, featuring a small French corporal as its hero, and it became very popular. However, the highlight of the Christmas works during those years was Mrs. Lirriper. She quickly became a well-known character, and everyone talked about Major Jemmy Jackman and his friend, the elderly lodging-house keeper on the Strand, with her struggles and rivalries, as if they had been part of London life as long as Norfolk Street itself. A dozen volumes couldn’t have conveyed more than those dozen pages did. The Legacy followed the Lodgings in 1864, and the humor and laughter remained just as strong.
OUR MUTUAL FRIEND.
The publication of Our Mutual Friend, in the form of the earliest stories, extended from May 1864 to November 1865. Four years earlier he had chosen this title as a good one, and he held to it through much objection. Between that time and his actual commencement there is mention, in his letters, of the three leading notions on which he founded the story. In his water-side wanderings during his last book, the many handbills he saw posted up, with dreary description of persons drowned in the river, suggested the 'long shore men and their ghastly calling whom he sketched in Hexam and Riderhood, "I think," he had written, "a man, young and perhaps eccentric, feigning to be dead, and being dead to all intents and purposes external to himself, and for years retaining the singular view of life and character so imparted, would be a good leading incident for a story;" and this he partly did in Rokesmith. For other actors in the tale, he had thought of "a poor impostor of a man marrying a woman for her money; she marrying him for his money; after marriage both finding out their mistake, and entering[372] into a league and covenant against folks in general:" with whom he had proposed to connect some Perfectly New people. "Everything new about them. If they presented a father and mother, it seemed as if they must be bran new, like the furniture and the carriages—shining with varnish, and just home from the manufacturers." These groups took shape in the Lammles and the Veneerings. "I must use somehow," is the remark of another letter, "the uneducated father in fustian and the educated boy in spectacles whom Leech and I saw at Chatham;" of which a hint is in Charley Hexam and his father. The benevolent old Jew whom he makes the unconscious agent of a rascal, was meant to wipe out a reproach against his Jew in Oliver Twist as bringing dislike upon the religion of the race he belonged to.[271]
The release of Our Mutual Friend began with its earliest stories from May 1864 to November 1865. Four years prior, he had picked this title, believing it was a strong choice, and he stuck with it despite a lot of pushback. In his letters from that time until he actually started writing, he mentioned the three main ideas that formed the basis of the story. While exploring the waterfront during his last book, the various posters he saw detailing people who drowned in the river inspired the 'longshoremen and their grim profession, which he depicted in Hexam and Riderhood. "I think," he wrote, "a young man, possibly eccentric, pretending to be dead, and in every practical sense being dead to the outside world, who holds onto a unique perspective on life and character for years, would make a compelling starting point for a story;" and he incorporated this partly into Rokesmith. For additional characters in the story, he envisioned "a pathetic con man marrying a woman for her wealth; her marrying him for his wealth; post-marriage, both realizing their blunder, and entering into an agreement against everyone else:" with whom he planned to connect some completely new characters. "Everything about them should be fresh. If they had parents, they had to be brand new, like the furniture and carriages—shining with polish, and just out of the factory." These ideas became the characters Lammles and Veneerings. "I have to incorporate somehow," another letter notes, "the unrefined father in worn-out clothing and the educated son in glasses that Leech and I spotted in Chatham;" of which hints can be seen in Charley Hexam and his father. The kind old Jewish man who unwittingly becomes an accomplice to a scoundrel was meant to counteract the criticism leveled at his Jewish character in Oliver Twist for casting a negative light on the faith of his people.[271]
Having got his title in '61 it was his hope to have begun in '62. "Alas!" he wrote in the April of that year, "I have hit upon nothing for a story. Again and again I have tried. But this odious little house" (he had at this time for a few weeks exchanged Gadshill for a friend's house near Kensington) "seems to have stifled and darkened my invention." It was not until the autumn of the following year he saw his way to a[373] beginning. "The Christmas number has come round again" (30th of August 1863)—"it seems only yesterday that I did the last—but I am full of notions besides for the new twenty numbers. When I can clear the Christmas stone out of the road, I think I can dash into it on the grander journey." He persevered through much difficulty; which he described six weeks later, with characteristic glance at his own ways when writing, in a letter from the office of his journal. "I came here last night, to evade my usual day in the week—in fact to shirk it—and get back to Gad's for five or six consecutive days. My reason is, that I am exceedingly anxious to begin my book. I am bent upon getting to work at it. I want to prepare it for the spring; but I am determined not to begin to publish with less than five numbers done. I see my opening perfectly, with the one main line on which the story is to turn; and if I don't strike while the iron (meaning myself) is hot, I shall drift off again, and have to go through all this uneasiness once more."
After getting his title in '61, he hoped to start in '62. "Alas!" he wrote in April of that year, "I have come up with nothing for a story. I've tried again and again. But this awful little house" (he had temporarily swapped Gadshill for a friend's place near Kensington) "seems to have stifled and darkened my creativity." It wasn't until the fall of the following year that he saw a way to a[373] beginning. "The Christmas number has come around again" (August 30, 1863)—"it feels like just yesterday that I finished the last one—but I'm full of ideas for the new twenty issues. Once I can clear the Christmas obstacle out of the way, I think I can dive into the grander journey." He pushed through a lot of difficulties; six weeks later, he described them in a letter from his journal's office, while also reflecting on his writing habits. "I came here last night to escape my usual day of the week—in fact, to avoid it—and to get back to Gad's for five or six days in a row. My reason is that I'm extremely eager to start my book. I'm determined to get to work on it. I want to have it ready for spring, but I won't begin publishing until I have at least five issues completed. I see my opening clearly, with the main line the story will revolve around; and if I don't take action while the iron (referring to myself) is hot, I'll drift off again and have to go through all this anxiety once more."
He had written, after four months, very nearly three numbers, when upon a necessary rearrangement of his chapters he had to hit upon a new subject for one of them. "While I was considering" (25th of February) "what it should be, Marcus,[272] who has done an excellent cover, came to tell me of an extraordinary trade he had found out, through one of his painting requirements.[374] I immediately went with him to Saint Giles's to look at the place, and found—what you will see." It was the establishment of Mr. Venus, preserver of animals and birds, and articulator of human bones; and it took the place of the last chapter of No. 2, which was then transferred to the end of No. 3. But a start with three full numbers done, though more than enough to satisfy the hardest self-conditions formerly, did not satisfy him now. With his previous thought given to the story, with his Memoranda to help him, with the people he had in hand to work it with, and ready as he still was to turn his untiring observation to instant use on its behalf, he now moved, with the old large canvas before him, somewhat slowly and painfully. "If I were to lose" (29th of March) "a page of the five numbers I have proposed to myself to be ready by the publication day, I should feel that I had fallen short. I have grown hard to satisfy, and write very slowly. And I have so much—not fiction—that will be thought of, when I don't want to think of it, that I am forced to take more care than I once took."
He had written, after four months, almost three issues when he had to come up with a new topic for one of them due to a necessary rearrangement of his chapters. "While I was thinking" (February 25th) "about what it should be, Marcus,[272] who made an amazing cover, came to tell me about an incredible deal he discovered through one of his painting needs.[374] I immediately went with him to Saint Giles's to check out the place, and found—what you will see." It was the business of Mr. Venus, who preserves animals and birds, and articulates human bones; it replaced the last chapter of No. 2, which was then moved to the end of No. 3. But starting with three complete issues done, although more than enough to satisfy even the toughest self-expectations before, didn’t satisfy him now. With his previous thoughts about the story, his notes to assist him, the people he had ready to work with, and being as prepared as he still was to put his keen observations to immediate use for it, he now moved, with the old broad canvas before him, somewhat slowly and painfully. "If I were to lose" (March 29th) "a page of the five issues I aim to have ready by publication day, I’d feel like I’ve fallen short. I’ve become hard to please, and I write very slowly. And I have so much—not fiction—that will come to mind when I don’t want to think about it, that I’m forced to be more careful than I used to be."
The first number was launched at last, on the first of May; and after two days he wrote: "Nothing can be better than Our Friend, now in his thirtieth thousand, and orders flowing in fast." But between the first and second number there was a drop of five thousand, strange to say, for the larger number was again reached, and much exceeded, before the book closed. "This leaves me" (10th of June) "going round and round like a carrier-pigeon before swooping on number seven." Thus far he had held his ground; but illness came, with some other anxieties, and on the 29th of July he[375] wrote sadly enough. "Although I have not been wanting in industry, I have been wanting in invention, and have fallen back with the book. Looming large before me is the Christmas work, and I can hardly hope to do it without losing a number of Our Friend. I have very nearly lost one already, and two would take one half of my whole advance. This week I have been very unwell; am still out of sorts; and, as I know from two days' slow experience, have a very mountain to climb before I shall see the open country of my work." The three following months brought hardly more favourable report. "I have not done my number. This death of poor Leech (I suppose) has put me out woefully. Yesterday and the day before I could do nothing; seemed for the time to have quite lost the power; and am only by slow degrees getting back into the track to-day." He rallied after this, and satisfied himself for a while; but in February 1865 that formidable illness in his foot broke out which, at certain times for the rest of his life, deprived him more or less of his inestimable solace of bodily exercise. In April and May he suffered severely; and after trying the sea went abroad for more complete change. "Work and worry, without exercise, would soon make an end of me. If I were not going away now, I should break down. No one knows as I know to-day how near to it I have been."
The first issue was finally released on May 1st; two days later he wrote: "Nothing can be better than Our Friend, now in its thirtieth thousand, and orders are coming in fast." But between the first and second issues, there was an unexpected drop of five thousand. Oddly enough, the larger number was reached again and surpassed before the book closed. "This leaves me" (June 10th) "going round and round like a carrier pigeon before swooping in on number seven." So far, he had maintained his position; but illness and other worries came, and on July 29th he wrote quite sadly: "Although I have not lacked effort, I have lacked creativity, and I have fallen behind with the book. The looming Christmas work is a big concern, and I can hardly expect to manage it without losing an issue of Our Friend. I have come close to losing one already, and losing two would take half of my entire advance. This week I have been quite unwell; I'm still feeling off; and from a slow two-day experience, I realize I have a significant challenge ahead before I can see clear progress in my work." The next three months hardly brought better news. "I haven't completed my issue. The death of poor Leech (I assume) has thrown me off badly. Yesterday and the day before, I was unable to do anything; I seemed to have completely lost my ability for the time being; and I'm only slowly finding my way back today." He recovered after this and felt somewhat better for a while; but in February 1865, that serious illness in his foot flared up, which at various times for the rest of his life would deprive him of his invaluable outlet of physical activity. He endured significant pain in April and May; after trying the sea, he went abroad for a more complete change. "Work and worry, without exercise, would soon take a toll on me. If I weren’t going away now, I would break down. No one knows, as I know today, how close I have been to that."
That was the day of his leaving for France, and the day of his return brought these few hurried words. "Saturday, tenth of June, 1865. I was in the terrific Staplehurst accident yesterday, and worked for hours among the dying and dead. I was in the carriage that[376] did not go over, but went off the line, and hung over the bridge in an inexplicable manner. No words can describe the scene.[273] I am away to Gads." Though with characteristic energy he resisted the effects upon himself of that terrible ninth of June, they were for some time evident; and, up to the day of his death on its fatal fifth anniversary, were perhaps never wholly absent. But very few complaints fell from him. "I am curiously weak—weak as if I were recovering from a long illness." "I begin to feel it more in my head. I sleep well and eat well; but I write half a dozen notes, and turn faint and sick." "I am getting right, though still low in pulse and very nervous. Driving into Rochester yesterday I felt more shaken than I have since the accident." "I cannot bear railway travelling yet. A perfect conviction, against the senses, that the carriage is down on one side (and generally that is the left, and not the side on which the carriage in the accident really went over), comes upon me with anything[377] like speed, and is inexpressibly distressing." These are passages from his letters up to the close of June. Upon his book the immediate result was that another lost number was added to the losses of the preceding months, and "alas!" he wrote at the opening of July, "for the two numbers you write of! There is only one in existence. I have but just begun the other." "Fancy!" he added next day, "fancy my having under-written number sixteen by two and a half pages—a thing I have not done since Pickwick!" He did it once with Dombey, and was to do it yet again.
That was the day he was leaving for France, and the day he returned brought these few rushed words. "Saturday, June 10, 1865. I was in the horrific Staplehurst accident yesterday and worked for hours among the dying and dead. I was in the carriage that[376] didn’t go over but went off the tracks and hung over the bridge in an inexplicable way. No words can capture the scene.[273] I am off to Gads." Though he typically fought against the impact of that dreadful June 9, the effects were evident for quite some time; up until the day of his death on the tragic fifth anniversary, they were perhaps never completely gone. But he rarely voiced any complaints. "I feel strangely weak—weak as if I'm recovering from a long illness." "I’m starting to notice it more in my head. I sleep well and eat well; but I write a few notes and feel faint and nauseous." "I’m getting better, but still have a low pulse and am very nervous. Driving into Rochester yesterday, I felt more shaken than I have since the accident." "I still can’t handle train travel. An absolute certainty, against all my senses, that the carriage is down on one side (usually the left, which is not the side the carriage in the accident actually tipped over), hits me with great speed and is incredibly distressing." These are excerpts from his letters until the end of June. For his book, the immediate result was that another lost issue was added to the series of losses from the previous months, and "alas!" he wrote at the start of July, "about the two issues you mentioned! There’s only one left. I've just started the other." "Imagine!" he added the next day, "imagine if I’ve under-written issue sixteen by two and a half pages—a thing I haven't done since Pickwick!" He did it once with Dombey, and was set to do it again.
The book thus begun and continued under adverse influences, though with fancy in it, descriptive power, and characters well designed, will never rank with his higher efforts. It has some pictures of a rare veracity of soul amid the lowest forms of social degradation, placed beside others of sheer falsehood and pretence amid unimpeachable social correctness, which lifted the writer to his old place; but the judgment of it on the whole must be, that it wants freshness and natural development. This indeed will be most freely admitted by those who feel most strongly that all the old cunning of the master hand is yet in the wayward loving Bella Wilfer, in the vulgar canting Podsnap, and in the dolls' dressmaker Jenny Wren, whose keen little quaint weird ways, and precocious wit sharpened by trouble, are fitted into a character as original and delightfully conceived as it is vividly carried through to the last. A dull coarse web her small life seems made of; but even from its taskwork, which is undertaken for childhood itself, there are glittering threads cast across its woof and warp of care. The unconscious philosophy of her[378] tricks and manners has in it more of the subtler vein of the satire aimed at in the book, than even the voices of society which the tale begins and ends with. In her very kindliness there is the touch of malice that shows a childish playfulness familiar with unnatural privations; this gives a depth as well as tenderness to her humours which entitles them to rank with the writer's happiest things; and though the odd little creature's talk is incessant when she is on the scene, it has the individuality that so seldom tires. It is veritably her own small "trick" and "manner," and is never mistakeable for any one else's. "I have been reading," Dickens wrote to me from France while he was writing the book, "a capital little story by Edmond About—The Notary's Nose. I have been trying other books; but so infernally conversational, that I forget who the people are before they have done talking, and don't in the least remember what they talked about before when they begin talking again!" The extreme contrast to his own art could not be defined more exactly; and other examples from this tale will be found in the differing members of the Wilfer family, in the riverside people at the Fellowship Porters, in such marvellous serio-comic scenes as that of Rogue Riderhood's restoration from drowning, and in those short and simple annals of Betty Higden's life and death which might have given saving virtue to a book more likely than this to perish prematurely. It has not the creative power which crowded his earlier page, and transformed into popular realities the shadows of his fancy; but the observation and humour he excelled in are not wanting to it, nor had there been, in his first completed work,[379] more eloquent or generous pleading for the poor and neglected, than this last completed work contains. Betty Higden finishes what Oliver Twist began.
The book, which started and continued under difficult circumstances, despite its imaginative elements, descriptive skill, and well-crafted characters, will never be considered among his best works. It contains some strikingly honest depictions of the human spirit amidst social degradation, contrasted with others that are purely false and pretentious within a seemingly correct social context, which elevated the writer back to his previous status. However, the overall judgment must be that it lacks freshness and organic development. This will surely be acknowledged, especially by those who believe that all the old craft of the master is still present in the whimsical and affectionate Bella Wilfer, the hypocritical Podsnap, and the eccentric dressmaker Jenny Wren, whose sharp, quirky, and precocious nature reflects her hardships and adds richness to her character, making her original and wonderfully conceived, right up to the end. Her seemingly dull and coarse life is woven from the mundane, yet even her mundane tasks, done for the sake of childhood itself, have shimmering threads that break through the fabric of her worries. The unintentional philosophy reflected in her quirks and manners embodies more of the nuanced satire intended in the book than even the societal critiques that the story opens and closes with. In her natural kindness lies a hint of malice that hints at a playful innocence familiar with unusual hardships; this adds depth as well as compassion to her humor, allowing it to stand alongside the writer's best work. Though she talks continuously when she's present, her distinctiveness is refreshingly engaging and never tiresome. It's truly her own unique "trick" and "manner," not mistaken for anyone else's. "I have been reading," Dickens wrote to me from France while working on this book, "a fantastic little story by Edmond About—The Notary's Nose. I've tried other books, but they’re so annoyingly conversational that I forget who the characters are before they finish talking and don’t remember what they talked about the last time they started up again!" There couldn't be a clearer contrast to his own style. Other examples from this story include the different members of the Wilfer family, the riverside folks at the Fellowship Porters, the incredible serio-comic scene of Rogue Riderhood’s rescue from drowning, and the brief yet poignant accounts of Betty Higden's life and death, which could’ve brought much-needed substance to a more likely candidate for premature failure than this one. It lacks the creative fire that filled his earlier works, transforming fleeting fantasies into popular realities; yet, it contains the sharp observation and humor he excelled at, and there hadn’t been, in his first completed work, a more eloquent or compassionate appeal for the poor and forgotten than what this final completed work holds. Betty Higden completes what Oliver Twist started.
DR. MARIGOLD AND TALES FOR AMERICA.
He had scarcely closed that book in September, wearied somewhat with a labour of invention which had not been so free or self-sustaining as in the old facile and fertile days, when his customary contribution to Christmas became due from him; and his fancy, let loose in a narrower field, resumed its old luxury of enjoyment. Here are notices of it from his letters. "If people at large understand a Cheap Jack, my part of the Christmas number will do well. It is wonderfully like the real thing, of course a little refined and humoured." "I do hope that in the beginning and end of this Christmas number you will find something that will strike you as being fresh, forcible, and full of spirits." He described its mode of composition afterwards. "Tired with Our Mutual, I sat down to cast about for an idea, with a depressing notion that I was, for the moment, overworked. Suddenly, the little character that you will see, and all belonging to it, came flashing up in the most cheerful manner, and I had only to look on and leisurely describe it." This was Dr. Marigold's Prescriptions, one of the most popular of all the pieces selected for his readings, and a splendid example of his humour, pathos, and character. There were three more Christmas pieces before he made his last visit to America: Barbox Brothers,[380] The Boy at Mugby Station, and No Thoroughfare: the last a joint piece of work with Mr. Wilkie Collins, who during Dickens's absence in the States transformed it into a play for Mr. Fechter, with a view to which it had been planned originally. There were also two papers written for first publication in America, George Silverman's Explanation, and Holiday Romance, containing about the quantity of half a shilling number of his ordinary serials, and paid for at a rate unexampled in literature. They occupied him not many days in the writing, and he received a thousand pounds for them.
He had barely finished that book in September, feeling a bit worn out from a creative process that wasn't as effortless or productive as it used to be in the past, when it was time for him to contribute his usual piece for Christmas. With his imagination now limited to a smaller scope, it returned to its old enjoyment. Here are some excerpts from his letters: "If the general public gets a Cheap Jack, my part of the Christmas issue will do well. It really resembles the real thing, just a bit polished and humorous." "I hope you find something fresh, impactful, and lively in the beginning and end of this Christmas issue." He later described how he wrote it: "Exhausted from Our Mutual, I sat down to brainstorm an idea, feeling a bit overwhelmed. Suddenly, the little character you’ll see, along with everything related to it, popped up in the most cheerful way, and I just had to observe and describe it leisurely." This was Dr. Marigold's Prescriptions, one of the most well-loved pieces he selected for his readings, showcasing his humor, pathos, and character. He created three more Christmas pieces before his last trip to America: Barbox Brothers, [380] The Boy at Mugby Station, and No Thoroughfare: the last one a collaboration with Mr. Wilkie Collins, who, while Dickens was in the States, adapted it into a play for Mr. Fechter, as it was originally intended. There were also two papers written for their first publication in America, George Silverman's Explanation and Holiday Romance, each roughly the length of half a shilling of his usual serials, and they were paid for at an unprecedented rate in literature. Writing them didn't take him many days, and he earned a thousand pounds for them.
The year after his return, as the reader knows, saw the commencement of the work which death interrupted. The fragment will hereafter be described; and here meanwhile may close my criticism—itself a fragment left for worthier completion by a stronger hand than mine.
The year after he came back, as you already know, marked the start of the work that death interrupted. The unfinished piece will be described later; for now, I’ll wrap up my critique—it’s just a fragment that deserves to be completed by someone more capable than I am.
But at least I may hope that the ground has been cleared by it from those distinctions and comparisons never safely to be applied to an original writer, and which always more or less intercept his fair appreciation. It was long the fashion to set up wide divergences between novels of incident and manners, and novels of character; the narrower range being left to Fielding and Smollett, and the larger to Richardson; yet there are not many now who will accept such classification. Nor is there more truth in other like distinctions alleged between novelists who are assumed to be real, or ideal, in their methods of treatment. To any original novelist of the higher grade there is[381] no meaning in these contrasted phrases. Neither mode can exist at all perfectly without the other. No matter how sensitive the mind to external impressions, or how keen the observation to whatever can be seen, without the rarer seeing of imagination nothing will be arrived at that is real in any genuine artist-sense. Reverse the proposition, and the result is expressed in an excellent remark of Lord Lytton's, that the happiest effort of imagination, however lofty it may be, is that which enables it to be cheerfully at home with the real. I have said that Dickens felt criticism, of whatever kind, with too sharp a relish for the indifference he assumed to it; but the secret was that he believed himself to be entitled to higher tribute than he was always in the habit of receiving. It was the feeling which suggested a memorable saying of Wordsworth. "I am not at all desirous that any one should write a critique on my poems. If they be from above, they will do their own work in course of time; if not, they will perish as they ought."
But at least I can hope that this has cleared away those distinctions and comparisons that shouldn’t really be used for an original writer, which often interfere with a fair appreciation of their work. For a long time, it was common to draw sharp lines between novels of plot and style, and novels of character; with the narrower range being assigned to Fielding and Smollett, and the broader to Richardson. Yet, not many people today will accept such classifications. The same goes for other similar distinctions made between novelists who are thought to be realistic or ideal in their approach. For any original novelist of a higher level, these contrasting phrases have no real meaning. Neither style can exist perfectly without the other. Regardless of how sensitive the mind is to outside influences, or how sharp the observation is to what can be seen, without the rarer insight of imagination, nothing real in the true artistic sense will come about. Flip the statement around, and you achieve what Lord Lytton famously noted: that the greatest triumph of imagination, no matter how lofty it may be, is that which allows it to feel comfortably grounded in reality. I’ve mentioned that Dickens felt criticism, in any form, with too keen a sensitivity for the indifference he pretended to have towards it; but the truth is he believed he deserved more recognition than he usually received. This was the feeling that inspired Wordsworth’s memorable saying: “I am not at all desirous that anyone should write a critique on my poems. If they are truly inspired, they will speak for themselves over time; if not, they will fade away as they should.”
The something "from above" never seems to be absent from Dickens, even at his worst. When the strain upon his invention became apparent, and he could only work freely in a more confined space than of old, it was still able to assert itself triumphantly; and his influence over his readers was continued by it to the last day of his life. Looking back over the series of his writings, the first reflection that rises to the mind of any thoughtful person, is one of thankfulness that the most popular of writers, who had carried into the lowest scenes and conditions an amount of observation, fun, and humour not approached by any[382] of his contemporaries, should never have sullied that world-wide influence by a hint of impurity or a possibility of harm. Nor is there anything more surprising than the freshness and variety of character which those writings include, within the range of the not numerous types of character that were the limit of their author's genius. For, this also appears, upon any review of them collectively, that the teeming life which is in them is that of the time in which his own life was passed; and that with the purpose of showing vividly its form and pressure, was joined the hope and design to leave it better than he found it. It has been objected that humanity receives from him no addition to its best types; that the burlesque humourist is always stronger in him than the reflective moralist; that the light thrown by his genius into out of the way corners of life never steadily shines in its higher beaten ways; and that beside his pictures of what man is or does, there is no attempt to show, by delineation of an exalted purpose or a great career, what man is able to be or to do. In the charge abstractedly there is truth; but the fair remark upon it is that whatever can be regarded as essential in the want implied by it will be found in other forms in his writings, that the perfect innocence of their laughter and tears has been itself a prodigious blessing, and that it is otherwise incident to so great a humourist to work after the fashion most natural to the genius of humour. What kind of work it has been in his case, the attempt is made in preceding pages to show; and on the whole it can be said with some certainty that the best ideals in this sense are obtained, not by presenting with added comeliness or grace the[383] figures which life is ever eager to present as of its best, but by connecting the singularities and eccentricities, which ordinary life is apt to reject or overlook, with the appreciation that is deepest and the laws of insight that are most universal. It is thus that all things human are happily brought within human sympathy. It was at the heart of everything Dickens wrote. It was the secret of the hope he had that his books might help to make people better; and it so guarded them from evil, that there is scarcely a page of the thousands he has written which might not be put into the hands of a little child.[384][274] It made him the intimate of every English household, and a familiar friend wherever the language is spoken whose stores of harmless pleasure he has so largely increased.
The thing "from above" is always present in Dickens, even at his worst. When the limits of his creativity became clear, and he could only write freely in a tighter space than before, it was still able to shine through triumphantly; his impact on readers lasted until the end of his life. Reflecting on his body of work, the first thought that comes to any thoughtful person is gratitude that the most popular writer, who brought a remarkable level of observation, humor, and fun to the lowest situations, never tainted that global influence with even a hint of impurity or potential harm. It's also amazing how fresh and varied the characters in his writings are, even within the limited types allowable by his talent. A closer look at them shows that they capture the lively spirit of the time he lived in, along with the aim to vividly depict its form and pressures, all while hoping to leave the world better than he found it. Some critics argue that humanity doesn't gain any new best types from him; that the humorous entertainer often overshadows the thoughtful moralist; that his genius only briefly illuminates the lesser-known aspects of life while neglecting to showcase, through examples of higher purposes or great achievements, what people are capable of becoming or doing. There is some truth to this critique; however, the fair response is that whatever is essential in this critique is found in other forms in his work. The pure innocence of his laughter and tears has been a tremendous blessing, and it's common for great humorists to work in a way that feels natural to the essence of humor. The type of work he has produced has been discussed in previous pages, and overall, it can be confidently said that the best ideals in this regard come not from presenting the best figures in life with added charm or elegance, but by connecting the quirks and eccentricities that everyday life tends to overlook or reject with the deepest appreciation and the most universal insights. This is how all things human are gladly brought into the realm of human empathy. It was at the core of everything Dickens wrote. This was the secret hope he had that his books could help make people better, and it safeguarded them from evil, making it so that there is hardly a page among the thousands he wrote that couldn’t be given to a child. It made him a close friend in every English household and a familiar companion wherever English is spoken, significantly enriching their stores of harmless enjoyment.
"The loss of no single man during the present generation, if we except Abraham Lincoln alone," said Mr. Horace Greeley, describing the profound and universal grief of America at his death, "has carried mourning into so many families, and been so unaffectedly lamented through all the ranks of society." "The terrible news from England," wrote Longfellow to me (Cambridge, Mass. 12th of June 1870), "fills us all with inexpressible sadness. Dickens was so full of life that it did not seem possible he could die, and yet he has gone before us, and we are sorrowing for him. . . . I never knew an author's death cause such general mourning. It is no exaggeration to say that this whole country is stricken with grief . . ." Nor was evidence then wanting, that far beyond the limits of society on that vast continent the English writer's influence had penetrated. Of this, very touching illustration was given in my first volume; and proof even more striking has since been afforded to me, that not merely in wild or rude communities, but in life the most savage[385] and solitary, his genius had helped to while time away.
"The loss of no single man during this generation, except for Abraham Lincoln," said Mr. Horace Greeley, describing the deep and widespread sorrow in America at his death, "has brought mourning into so many families and has been so genuinely felt across all levels of society." "The terrible news from England," wrote Longfellow to me (Cambridge, Mass. 12th of June 1870), "fills us all with overwhelming sadness. Dickens was so full of life that it seemed impossible for him to die, and yet he has left us, and we are grieving for him. I have never seen an author's death cause such widespread mourning. It is no exaggeration to say that the whole country is engulfed in grief." There was also clear evidence that the English writer's impact extended far beyond the boundaries of society on that vast continent. A very touching example of this was shared in my first volume; even more compelling evidence has since come to my attention, showing that not only in wild or rough communities, but in the most savage and isolated lives, his genius had helped to pass the time.
"Like all Americans who read," writes an American gentleman, "and that takes in nearly all our people, I am an admirer and student of Dickens. . . . Its perusal" (that of my second volume) "has recalled an incident which may interest you. Twelve or thirteen years ago I crossed the Sierra Nevada mountains as a Government surveyor under a famous frontiersman and civil engineer—Colonel Lander. We were too early by a month, and became snow-bound just on the very summit. Under these circumstances it was necessary to abandon the wagons for a time, and drive the stock (mules) down the mountains to the valleys where there was pasturage and running water. This was a long and difficult task, occupying several days. On the second day, in a spot where we expected to find nothing more human than a grizzly bear or an elk, we found a little hut, built of pine boughs and a few rough boards clumsily hewn out of small trees with an axe. The hut was covered with snow many feet deep, excepting only the hole in the roof which served for a chimney, and a small pit-like place in front to permit egress. The occupant came forth to hail us and solicit whisky and tobacco. He was dressed in a suit made entirely of flour-sacks, and was curiously labelled on various parts of his person Best Family Flour. Extra. His head was covered by a wolf's skin drawn from the brute's head—with the ears standing erect in a fierce alert manner. He was a most extraordinary object, and told us he had not seen a human being in four months. He lived on bear and elk meat and flour laid in during his short[386] summer. Emigrants in the season paid him a kind of ferry-toll. I asked him how he passed his time, and he went to a barrel and produced Nicholas Nickleby and Pickwick. I found he knew them almost by heart. He did not know, or seem to care, about the author; but he gloried in Sam Weller, despised Squeers, and would probably have taken the latter's scalp with great skill and cheerfulness. For Mr. Winkle he had no feeling but contempt, and in fact regarded a fowling-piece as only a toy for a squaw. He had no Bible; and perhaps if he practised in his rude savage way all Dickens taught, he might less have felt the want even of that companion."
"Like all Americans who read," writes an American gentleman, "and that includes nearly everyone, I’m a fan and student of Dickens. Its reading" (that of my second volume) "has reminded me of an incident that might interest you. Twelve or thirteen years ago, I crossed the Sierra Nevada mountains as a government surveyor with a well-known frontiersman and civil engineer—Colonel Lander. We were a month too early and got snowed in right at the summit. Under these conditions, we had to leave the wagons for a while and drive the livestock (mules) down the mountains to the valleys where there was grass and running water. This was a long and challenging task that took several days. On the second day, in a place where we expected to find nothing more human than a grizzly bear or an elk, we stumbled upon a small hut made of pine branches and a few rough boards awkwardly chopped from small trees with an axe. The hut was buried under several feet of snow, except for a hole in the roof that served as a chimney and a small pit-like opening in front to allow us to exit. The occupant came out to greet us and asked for whiskey and tobacco. He was dressed in a suit made entirely of flour sacks, which were strangely labeled on various parts of his body Best Family Flour. Extra. His head was covered by a wolf's skin, pulled over the animal's head, with the ears standing up in a fierce, alert manner. He was quite an unusual sight and told us he hadn't seen another person in four months. He survived on bear and elk meat and flour he had stored up during the short summer. Emigrants passing through paid him a sort of ferry toll. I asked him how he spent his time, and he went to a barrel and pulled out Nicholas Nickleby and Pickwick. I found out he knew them almost by heart. He didn’t know or seem to care about the author, but he took pride in Sam Weller, had disdain for Squeers, and would probably have happily taken the latter's scalp with great skill. For Mr. Winkle, he felt nothing but contempt and actually saw a fowling-piece as just a toy for a squaw. He didn’t have a Bible; and perhaps if he practiced in his rough, savage way everything Dickens taught, he might have felt less need for that companion."
CHAPTER XV.
AMERICA REVISITED: NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 1867.
1867.
It is the intention of this and the following chapter to narrate the incidents of the visit to America in Dickens's own language, and in that only. They will consist almost exclusively of extracts from his letters written home, to members of his family and to myself.
This and the next chapter aim to share the experiences from the visit to America using Dickens's own words, and only those. They will mostly include excerpts from his letters sent home to his family and to me.
On the night of Tuesday the 19th of November he arrived at Boston, where he took up his residence at the Parker House hotel; and his first letter (21st) stated that the tickets for the first four Readings, all to that time issued, had been sold immediately on their becoming saleable. "An immense train of people waited in the freezing street for twelve hours, and passed into the office in their turns, as at a French theatre. The[388] receipts already taken for these nights exceed our calculation by more than £250." Up to the last moment, he had not been able to clear off wholly a shade of misgiving that some of the old grudges might make themselves felt; but from the instant of his setting foot in Boston not a vestige of such fear remained. The greeting was to the full as extraordinary as that of twenty-five years before, and was given now, as then, to the man who had made himself the most popular writer in the country. His novels and tales were crowding the shelves of all the dealers in books in all the cities of the Union. In every house, in every car, on every steamboat, in every theatre of America, the characters, the fancies, the phraseology of Dickens were become familiar beyond those of any other writer of books. "Even in England," said one of the New York journals, "Dickens is less known than here; and of the millions here who treasure every word he has written, there are tens of thousands who would make a large sacrifice to see and hear the man who has made happy so many hours. Whatever sensitiveness there once was to adverse or sneering criticism, the lapse of a quarter of a century, and the profound significance of a great war, have modified or removed." The point was more pithily, and as truly, put by Mr. Horace Greeley in the Tribune. "The fame as a novelist which Mr. Dickens had already created in America, and which, at the best, has never yielded him anything particularly munificent or substantial, is become his capital stock in the present enterprise."
On the night of Tuesday, November 19th, he arrived in Boston, where he stayed at the Parker House hotel. His first letter, dated the 21st, mentioned that tickets for the first four Readings had sold out immediately upon going on sale. "A huge crowd waited in the freezing street for twelve hours, entering the office one by one, just like at a French theater. The[388] receipts we've gathered for these nights have exceeded our expectations by over £250." Up until the last moment, he had carried a slight worry that some old grudges might come back to haunt him; but from the moment he stepped foot in Boston, that fear vanished completely. The welcome he received was just as extraordinary as it had been twenty-five years ago and was given, as before, to the man who had become the most popular writer in the country. His novels and stories filled the shelves of every bookstore in all the cities across the U.S. In every home, on every train, on every steamboat, and in every theater in America, the characters, ideas, and phrases of Dickens had become more familiar than those of any other author. "Even in England," said one of the New York newspapers, "Dickens is less known than here; and among the millions who cherish every word he's written, there are countless people who would be willing to make a significant sacrifice just to see and hear the man who has brought them so much joy." Any sensitivity he once had to negative or mocking criticism has faded over time, especially after the profound impact of a major war. Mr. Horace Greeley summed it up succinctly and accurately in the Tribune: "The fame Mr. Dickens has built as a novelist in America, which has never provided him with particularly generous rewards, has now become his asset in this current venture."
The first Reading was appointed for the second of December, and in the interval he saw some old friends[389] and made some new ones.[275] Boston he was fond of comparing to Edinburgh as Edinburgh was in the days when several dear friends of his own still lived there. Twenty-five years had changed much in the American city; some genial faces were gone, and on ground which he had left a swamp he found now the most princely streets; but there was no abatement of the old warmth of kindness, and, with every attention and consideration shown to him, there was no intrusion. He was not at first completely conscious of the change in this respect, or of the prodigious increase in the size of Boston. But the latter grew upon him from day to day, and then there was impressed along with it a[390] contrast to which it was difficult to reconcile himself. Nothing enchanted him so much as what he again saw of the delightful domestic life of Cambridge, simple, self-respectful, cordial, and affectionate; and it seemed impossible to believe that within half an hour's distance of it should be found what might at any time be witnessed in such hotels as that which he was staying at: crowds of swaggerers, loafers, bar-loungers, and dram-drinkers, that seemed to be making up, from day to day, not the least important-part of the human life of the city. But no great mercantile resort in the States, such as Boston had now become, could be without that drawback; and fortunate should we account any place to be, though even so plague-afflicted, that has yet so near it the healthier influence of the other life which our older world has wellnigh lost altogether.
The first Reading was set for December 2nd, and in the meantime, he reconnected with some old friends[389] and made a few new ones.[275] He often compared Boston to Edinburgh as it was back when many of his close friends still lived there. Twenty-five years had changed a lot in the American city; some friendly faces were gone, and land that he had left as a swamp now had the most impressive streets. However, the warmth of kindness hadn’t diminished, and he received plenty of attention and consideration without any feeling of being intruded upon. At first, he wasn't fully aware of the changes in this regard or the significant growth of Boston. But this realization hit him more and more each day, and along with it came a contrast that was hard to accept. Nothing delighted him more than seeing the lovely domestic life in Cambridge—simple, self-respecting, warm, and affectionate. It seemed unbelievable that just half an hour away, he could witness the scene at the hotel where he was staying: crowds of loud, idle people, barflies, and drinkers, who seemed to make up a significant part of the city’s life. But no major business hub in the U.S., like Boston had become, could escape that downside; and we should consider ourselves lucky to find any place, even one affected by such issues, that still has the healthier influence of the other life that our older world has almost completely lost.
"The city has increased prodigiously in twenty-five years," he wrote to his daughter Mary. "It has grown more mercantile. It is like Leeds mixed with Preston, and flavoured with New Brighton. Only, instead of smoke and fog, there is an exquisitely bright light air." "Cambridge is exactly as I left it," he wrote to me. "Boston more mercantile, and much larger. The hotel I formerly stayed at, and thought a very big one, is now regarded as a very small affair. I do not yet notice—but a day, you know, is not a long time for observation!—any marked change in character or habits. In this immense hotel I live very high up, and have a hot and cold bath in my bed room, with other comforts not in existence in my former day. The cost of living is enormous." "Two of the staff are at New York," he wrote to his[391] sister-in-law on the 25th of November, "where we are at our wits' end how to keep tickets out of the hands of speculators. We have communications from all parts of the country, but we take no offer whatever. The young under-graduates of Cambridge have made a representation to Longfellow that they are 500 strong and cannot get one ticket. I don't know what is to be done, but I suppose I must read there, somehow. We are all in the clouds until I shall have broken ground in New York." The sale of tickets, there, had begun two days before the first reading in Boston. "At the New York barriers," he wrote to his daughter on the first of December, "where the tickets were on sale and the people ranged as at the Paris theatres, speculators went up and down offering twenty dollars for any body's place. The money was in no case accepted. But one man sold two tickets for the second, third, and fourth nights; his payment in exchange being one ticket for the first night, fifty dollars (about £7 10s.), and a 'brandy-cocktail.'"
"The city has grown tremendously in the last twenty-five years," he wrote to his daughter Mary. "It's become more commercial. It feels like a mix of Leeds and Preston, with a hint of New Brighton. But instead of smoke and fog, there's a wonderfully bright and clear atmosphere." "Cambridge is just the way I left it," he wrote to me. "Boston is more commercial and much bigger. The hotel I used to stay at, which I thought was pretty large, is now seen as quite small. I haven't noticed—though, you know, a day isn't a long time to observe!—any major changes in character or customs. I’m staying very high up in this massive hotel, and I have a hot and cold bath in my bedroom, along with other amenities that didn’t exist in my earlier days. The cost of living is outrageous." "Two of the staff are in New York," he wrote to his[391]sister-in-law on November 25th, "where we're struggling to keep tickets out of the hands of scalpers. We’re getting requests from all over the country, but we’re not accepting any offers. The young undergraduates from Cambridge have reached out to Longfellow, saying they are 500 strong and can’t get a single ticket. I have no idea what to do, but I guess I have to read there somehow. We’re all anxious until I can get started in New York." The ticket sales there had begun two days before the first reading in Boston. "At the New York venues," he wrote to his daughter on December 1st, "where the tickets were on sale and people lined up like at the Paris theaters, scalpers were going up and down offering twenty dollars for anyone's spot. No one accepted the money. But one guy sold two tickets for the second, third, and fourth nights; he paid by trading one ticket for the first night, fifty dollars (about £7 10s.), and a 'brandy-cocktail.'"
On Monday the second of December he read for the first time in Boston, his subjects being the Carol and the Trial from Pickwick; and his reception, from an audience than which perhaps none more remarkable could have been brought together, went beyond all expectations formed. "It is really impossible," he wrote to me next morning, "to exaggerate the magnificence of the reception or the effect of the reading. The whole city will talk of nothing else and hear of nothing else to-day. Every ticket for those announced here, and in New York, is sold. All are sold at the highest price, for which in our calculation[392] we made no allowance; and it is impossible to keep out speculators who immediately sell at a premium. At the decreased rate of money even, we had above £450 English in the house last night; and the New York hall holds 500 people more. Everything looks brilliant beyond the most sanguine hopes, and I was quite as cool last night as though I were reading at Chatham." The next night he read again; and also on Thursday and Friday; on Wednesday he had rested; and on Saturday he travelled to New York.
On Monday, December 2nd, he read for the first time in Boston, choosing the Carol and the Trial from Pickwick; the reception he received from an audience that was possibly more remarkable than any other turned out to be better than he had anticipated. "It’s really impossible," he wrote to me the next morning, "to overstate the magnificence of the reception or the impact of the reading. The entire city will talk about nothing else and hear of nothing else today. Every ticket for the shows announced here and in New York is sold out. All are sold at the highest price, for which we didn’t factor in our calculations[392], and it's impossible to keep out speculators who immediately resell at a premium. Even with the lower rate of money, we had over £450 English in the house last night; and the New York venue holds 500 more people. Everything looks incredibly promising, beyond our wildest expectations, and I was as calm last night as if I were reading at Chatham." The next night, he read again; and also on Thursday and Friday; on Wednesday, he took a break; and on Saturday, he traveled to New York.
He had written, the day before he left, that he was making a clear profit of thirteen hundred pounds English a week, even allowing seven dollars to the pound; but words were added having no good omen in them, that the weather was taking a turn of even unusual severity, and that he found the climate, in the suddenness of its changes, "and the wide leaps they take," excessively trying. "The work is of course rather trying too; but the sound position that everything must be subservient to it enables me to keep aloof from invitations. To-morrow," ran the close of the letter, "we move to New York. We cannot beat the speculators in our tickets. We sell no more than six to any one person for the course of four readings; but these speculators, who sell at greatly increased prices and make large profits, will employ any number of men to buy. One of the chief of them—now living in this house, in order that he may move as we move!—can put on 50 people in any place we go to; and thus he gets 300 tickets into his own hands." Almost while Dickens was writing these words an eye-witness was describing to a Philadelphia paper the sale of the New York[393] tickets. The pay-place was to open at nine on a Wednesday morning, and at midnight of Tuesday a long line of speculators were assembled in queue; at two in the morning a few honest buyers had begun to arrive; at five there were, of all classes, two lines of not less than 800 each; at eight there were at least 5000 persons in the two lines; at nine each line was more than three-quarters of a mile in length, and neither became sensibly shorter during the whole morning. "The tickets for the course were all sold before noon. Members of families relieved each other in the queues; waiters flew across the streets and squares from the neighbouring restaurant, to serve parties who were taking their breakfast in the open December air; while excited men offered five and ten dollars for the mere permission to exchange places with other persons standing nearer the head of the line!"
He had written the day before he left that he was making a clear profit of thirteen hundred pounds a week, even with seven dollars to the pound; but he added some words that didn’t sound good, mentioning that the weather was turning unusually severe and that he found the climate, with its sudden changes and "the wide leaps they take," quite exhausting. "The work is pretty taxing too; but since everything has to serve it, I can avoid invitations. Tomorrow," the letter concluded, "we're moving to New York. We can't compete with the speculators for our tickets. We sell no more than six to each person for the four readings; but these speculators, who sell at much higher prices and make big profits, will hire as many people as they need to buy tickets. One of the main ones—who's currently living in this house so he can follow us!—can get 50 people in any place we go; and thus he ends up with 300 tickets in his hands." Almost while Dickens was writing this, an eyewitness was detailing to a Philadelphia paper the ticket sale in New York[393]. The ticket office was set to open at nine on a Wednesday morning, and at midnight on Tuesday, a long line of speculators had gathered in queue; by two in the morning a few honest buyers had started to show up; by five, there were two lines of at least 800 people each; by eight, that number rose to at least 5000 in the two lines; and by nine, each line was more than three-quarters of a mile long, and neither got noticeably shorter throughout the morning. "The tickets for the course were completely sold out by noon. Family members took turns in the queues; waiters rushed across the streets and squares from the nearby restaurant to serve groups having breakfast in the open December air; while excited men offered five and ten dollars just for the chance to swap places with others closer to the front of the line!"
The effect of the reading in New York corresponded with this marvellous preparation, and Dickens characterised his audience as an unexpected support to him; in its appreciation quick and unfailing, and highly demonstrative in its satisfactions. On the 11th of December he wrote to his daughter: "Amazing success. A very fine audience, far better than at Boston. Carol and Trial on first night, great: still greater, Copperfield and Bob Sawyer on second. For the tickets of the four readings of next week there were, at nine o'clock this morning, 3000 people in waiting, and they had begun to assemble in the bitter cold as early as two o'clock in the morning." To myself he wrote on the 15th, adding touches to the curious picture. "Dolby has got into trouble about the manner of issuing the[394] tickets for next week's series. He cannot get four thousand people into a room holding only two thousand, he cannot induce people to pay at the ordinary price for themselves instead of giving thrice as much to speculators, and he is attacked in all directions . . . I don't much like my hall, for it has two large balconies far removed from the platform; but no one ever waylays me as I go into it or come out of it, and it is kept as rigidly quiet as the Français at a rehearsal. We have not yet had in it less than £430 per night, allowing for the depreciated currency! I send £3000 to England by this packet. From all parts of the States, applications and offers continually come in. We go to Boston next Saturday for two more readings, and come back here on Christmas Day for four more. I am not yet bound to go elsewhere, except three times (each time for two nights) to Philadelphia; thinking it wisest to keep free for the largest places. I have had an action brought against me by a man who considered himself injured (and really may have been) in the matter of his tickets. Personal service being necessary, I was politely waited on by a marshal for that purpose; whom I received with the greatest courtesy, apparently very much to his amazement. The action was handsomely withdrawn next day, and the plaintiff paid his own costs. . . . Dolby hopes you are satisfied with the figures so far; the profit each night exceeding the estimated profit by £130 odd. He is anxious I should also tell you that he is the most unpopular and best-abused man in America." Next day a letter to his sister-in-law related an incident too common in American cities to disconcert any but strangers. He had lodged himself,[395] I should have said, at the Westminster Hotel in Irving Place. "Last night I was getting into bed just at 12 o'clock, when Dolby came to my door to inform me that the house was on fire. I got Scott up directly; told him first to pack the books and clothes for the Readings; dressed, and pocketed my jewels and papers; while the manager stuffed himself out with money. Meanwhile the police and firemen were in the house tracing the mischief to its source in a certain fire-grate. By this time the hose was laid all through from a great tank on the roof, and everybody turned out to help. It was the oddest sight, and people had put the strangest things on! After chopping and cutting with axes through stairs, and much handing about of water, the fire was confined to a dining-room in which it had originated; and then everybody talked to everybody else, the ladies being particularly loquacious and cheerful. I may remark that the second landlord (from both, but especially the first, I have had untiring attention) no sooner saw me on this agitating occasion, than, with his property blazing, he insisted on taking me down into a room full of hot smoke, to drink brandy and water with him! And so we got to bed again about 2."
The reading in New York had a huge impact, matching the excellent preparations, and Dickens described his audience as unexpectedly supportive; they were quick and consistent in their appreciation, and very expressive in their enjoyment. On December 11th, he wrote to his daughter: "Incredible success. A very nice audience, much better than in Boston. Carol and Trial on the first night were great; even better, Copperfield and Bob Sawyer on the second. For the tickets to the four readings next week, at nine o'clock this morning, there were 3000 people waiting, and they started showing up in the freezing cold as early as two o'clock in the morning." He wrote to me on the 15th, adding details to the peculiar situation. "Dolby has gotten into trouble over how he issued the [394] tickets for next week's series. He can't fit four thousand people into a venue that holds only two thousand, he can't entice people to pay regular prices instead of giving three times as much to scalpers, and he's facing criticism from all sides... I’m not a fan of my venue, as it has two large balconies that are far from the stage; however, no one ever waits for me as I enter or exit, and it's kept as quiet as the Français during a rehearsal. We've had no night making less than £430, considering the lower currency value! I'm sending £3000 to England with this packet. We keep getting requests and offers from all over the States. We're headed to Boston next Saturday for two more readings, and we’ll return here on Christmas Day for four more. I'm not committed to any other places, except three times (each time for two nights) in Philadelphia, thinking it’s smarter to stay available for the biggest venues. I had a lawsuit filed against me by a guy who thought he was wronged (and might really have been) over his tickets. Since personal service was necessary, a marshal politely came to me for that purpose; I received him with utmost courtesy, which seemed to surprise him quite a bit. The lawsuit was withdrawn the next day, and the plaintiff covered his own costs... Dolby hopes you're happy with the figures so far; the profit each night exceeds the estimated profit by about £130. He's eager for me to tell you that he's the most unpopular and most criticized man in America." The next day a letter to his sister-in-law mentioned an incident all too common in American cities that would only rattle newcomers. He had settled himself, I should say, at the Westminster Hotel in Irving Place. "Last night, I was just about to get into bed at midnight when Dolby came to my door to tell me that the house was on fire. I immediately woke Scott up; told him to pack the books and clothes for the readings; got dressed, and grabbed my jewels and important papers; while the manager stuffed his pockets with cash. Meanwhile, police and firefighters were in the building tracing the source of the fire to a specific grate. By that time, a hose had been laid from a huge tank on the roof, and everyone came out to help. It was the weirdest sight, and people were wearing the strangest things! After chopping and cutting through stairs with axes and passing around water, the fire was contained to a dining room where it started; then everyone started chatting with each other, with the ladies being especially talkative and cheerful. I should note that the second landlord (from both, but particularly the first, I’ve received tireless attention) immediately saw me during this stressful situation, and despite his property burning, he insisted on taking me to a room full of hot smoke to drink brandy and water with him! So, we finally got back to bed around 2."
Dickens had been a week in New York before he was able to identify the great city which a lapse of twenty-five years had so prodigiously increased. "The only portion that has even now come back to me," he wrote, "is the part of Broadway in which the Carlton Hotel (long since destroyed) used to stand. There is a very fine new park in the outskirts, and the number of grand houses and splendid equipages is quite surprising.[396] There are hotels close here with 500 bedrooms and I don't know how many boarders; but this hotel is quite as quiet as, and not much larger than, Mivart's in Brook Street. My rooms are all en suite, and I come and go by a private door and private staircase communicating with my bed-room. The waiters are French, and one might be living in Paris. One of the two proprietors is also proprietor of Niblo's Theatre, and the greatest care is taken of me. Niblo's great attraction, the Black Crook, has now been played every night for 16 months(!), and is the most preposterous peg to hang ballets on that was ever seen. The people who act in it have not the slightest idea of what it is about, and never had; but, after taxing my intellectual powers to the utmost, I fancy that I have discovered Black Crook to be a malignant hunchback leagued with the Powers of Darkness to separate two lovers; and that the Powers of Lightness coming (in no skirts whatever) to the rescue, he is defeated. I am quite serious in saying that I do not suppose there are two pages of All the Year Round in the whole piece (which acts all night); the whole of the rest of it being ballets of all sorts, perfectly unaccountable processions, and the Donkey out of last year's Covent Garden pantomime! At the other theatres, comic operas, melodramas, and domestic dramas prevail all over the city, and my stories play no inconsiderable part in them. I go nowhere, having laid down the rule that to combine visiting with my work would be absolutely impossible. . . . The Fenian explosion at Clerkenwell was telegraphed here in a few hours. I do not think there is any sympathy whatever with the Fenians on the part[397] of the American people, though political adventurers may make capital out of a show of it. But no doubt large sections of the Irish population of this State are themselves Fenian; and the local politics of the place are in a most depraved condition, if half of what is said to me be true. I prefer not to talk of these things, but at odd intervals I look round for myself. Great social improvements in respect of manners and forbearance have come to pass since I was here before, but in public life I see as yet but little change."
Dickens had been in New York for a week before he was able to recognize the vast city that had increased so dramatically over twenty-five years. "The only part that has come back to me," he wrote, "is the stretch of Broadway where the Carlton Hotel (long since gone) used to be. There's a really nice new park on the outskirts, and the number of grand houses and fancy carriages is quite astonishing.[396] There are hotels nearby with 500 rooms and who knows how many guests; but this hotel is just as quiet as, and not much bigger than, Mivart's in Brook Street. My rooms are all connected, and I come and go through a private door and staircase that leads to my bedroom. The waiters are French, making it feel like living in Paris. One of the two owners also owns Niblo's Theatre, and they take great care of me. Niblo's big draw, the Black Crook, has now been performed every night for 16 months(!), and it’s the most ridiculous excuse for a ballet you’ve ever seen. The people performing in it have no idea what it’s really about, and they never have; but after pushing my brain to its limits, I think I’ve figured out that the Black Crook is a nasty hunchback working with Dark Forces to keep two lovers apart; and that the Forces of Light (without any skirts at all) come to save the day, and he gets beaten. I honestly don’t think there are even two pages of All the Year Round in the entire show (which runs all night); the rest is filled with all sorts of ballet, completely bizarre parades, and the Donkey from last year’s Covent Garden pantomime! At the other theaters, comic operas, melodramas, and domestic dramas are everywhere, and my stories play a significant role in them. I don't go out, as I've decided that mixing visiting with my work would be completely impossible. . . . The Fenian explosion at Clerkenwell was reported here within a few hours. I don’t believe there’s any real sympathy for the Fenians among the American people, although political opportunists may try to take advantage of the situation. However, there’s no doubt that large portions of the Irish population here are themselves Fenian; and the local politics are in a pretty bad state, if half of what I hear is true. I prefer not to discuss these matters, but at odd moments, I look around for myself. There have been significant social improvements in terms of manners and tolerance since I was here before, but in public life, I still see very little change."
He had got through half of his first New York readings when a winter storm came on, and from this time until very near his return the severity of the weather was exceptional even for America. When the first snow fell, the railways were closed for some days; and he described New York crowded with sleighs, and the snow piled up in enormous walls the whole length of the streets. "I turned out in a rather gorgeous sleigh yesterday with any quantity of buffalo robes, and made an imposing appearance." "If you were to behold me driving out," he wrote to his daughter, "furred up to the moustache, with an immense white red-and-yellow-striped rug for a covering, you would suppose me to be of Hungarian or Polish nationality." These protections nevertheless availed him little; and when the time came for getting back to Boston, he found himself at the close of his journey with a cold and cough that never again left him until he had quitted the country, and of which the effects became more and more disastrous. For the present there was little allusion to this, his belief at the first being strong that he[398] should overmaster it; but it soon forced itself into all his letters.
He had made it through half of his first readings in New York when a winter storm hit, and from that point until just before his return, the weather was unusually harsh, even for America. When the first snow fell, the railways were shut down for several days, and he described New York filled with sleighs, with snow piled up in massive walls along the streets. "I went out in a pretty fancy sleigh yesterday, loaded with buffalo robes, and I looked quite impressive." "If you saw me driving around," he wrote to his daughter, "all wrapped up to my mustache, with a huge white rug striped in red and yellow covering me, you’d think I was Hungarian or Polish." However, these layers of protection didn't help much; and when it was time to return to Boston, he found himself at the end of his trip with a cold and cough that stayed with him until he left the country, worsening over time. For now, he didn’t mention it much, believing at first that he would overcome it; but soon it became apparent in all his letters.
His railway journey otherwise had not been agreeable. "The railways are truly alarming. Much worse (because more worn I suppose) than when I was here before. We were beaten about yesterday, as if we had been aboard the Cuba. Two rivers have to be crossed, and each time the whole train is banged aboard a big steamer. The steamer rises and falls with the river, which the railroad don't do; and the train is either banged up hill or banged down hill. In coming off the steamer at one of these crossings yesterday, we were banged up such a height that the rope broke, and one carriage rushed back with a run down-hill into the boat again. I whisked out in a moment, and two or three others after me; but nobody else seemed to care about it. The treatment of the luggage is perfectly outrageous. Nearly every case I have is already broken. When we started from Boston yesterday, I beheld, to my unspeakable amazement, Scott, my dresser, leaning a flushed countenance against the wall of the car, and weeping bitterly. It was over my smashed writing-desk. Yet the arrangements for luggage are excellent, if the porters would not be beyond description reckless." The same excellence of provision, and flinging away of its advantages, are observed in connection with another subject in the same letter. "The halls are excellent. Imagine one holding two thousand people, seated with exact equality for every one of them, and every one seated separately. I have nowhere, at home or abroad, seen so fine a police as the police of New York; and their bearing in the streets is above[399] all praise. On the other hand, the laws for regulation of public vehicles, clearing of streets, and removal of obstructions, are wildly outraged by the people for whose benefit they are intended. Yet there is undoubtedly improvement in every direction, and I am taking time to make up my mind on things in general. Let me add that I have been tempted out at three in the morning to visit one of the large police station-houses, and was so fascinated by the study of a horrible photograph-book of thieves' portraits that I couldn't shut it up."
His train journey hadn’t been great. "The railways are really alarming. Much worse (probably because they’re more worn) than when I was here before. We were tossed around yesterday, as if we were on the Cuba. Two rivers have to be crossed, and each time the whole train is loaded onto a big steamer. The steamer rises and falls with the river, while the railroad doesn’t; and the train is either shoved up a hill or pushed down it. When we got off the steamer at one of these crossings yesterday, we were lifted to such a height that the rope broke, and one carriage rolled back down the hill into the boat again. I jumped out in a flash, and two or three others followed me; but nobody else seemed to care. The way they handle luggage is absolutely outrageous. Almost every case I have is already broken. When we left Boston yesterday, I was utterly shocked to see Scott, my dresser, leaning a flushed face against the wall of the car, and weeping bitterly. It was over my smashed writing desk. Yet the luggage arrangements are excellent, if only the porters weren't unbelievably reckless." The same level of care and waste of its benefits can be seen in connection with another topic in the same letter. "The halls are great. Imagine one that holds two thousand people, each seated equally and separately. I've never seen such a fine police force as the police of New York; their presence in the streets is beyond all praise. On the flip side, the laws for regulating public vehicles, clearing streets, and removing obstructions are wildly disregarded by the very people they’re meant to help. Still, there’s definitely improvement in every direction, and I’m taking my time to figure things out in general. Let me add that I was tempted to go out at three in the morning to visit one of the large police stations, and I was so intrigued by a horrible photo book of thieves' portraits that I couldn't put it down."
A letter of the same date (22nd) to his sister-in-law told of personal attentions awaiting him on his return to Boston by which he was greatly touched. He found his rooms garnished with flowers and holly, with real red berries, and with festoons of moss; and the homely Christmas look of the place quite affected him. "There is a certain Captain Dolliver belonging to the Boston custom-house, who came off in the little steamer that brought me ashore from the Cuba; and he took it into his head that he would have a piece of English mistletoe brought out in this week's Cunard, which should be laid upon my breakfast-table. And there it was this morning. In such affectionate touches as this, these New England people are especially amiable. . . . As a general rule you may lay it down that whatever you see about me in the papers is not true; but you may generally lend a more believing ear to the Philadelphia correspondent of the Times, a well-informed gentleman. Our hotel in New York was on fire again the other night. But fires in this country are quite matters of course. There was a large one in Boston at four this[400] morning; and I don't think a single night has passed, since I have been under the protection of the Eagle, that I have not heard the Fire Bells dolefully clanging all over both cities." The violent abuse of his manager by portions of the press is the subject of the rest of the letter, and receives farther illustration in one of the same date to me. "A good specimen of the sort of newspaper you and I know something of, came out in Boston here this morning. The editor had applied for our advertisements, saying that 'it was at Mr. D's disposal for paragraphs.' The advertisements were not sent; Dolby did not enrich its columns paragraphically; and among its news to-day is the item that 'this chap calling himself Dolby got drunk down town last night, and was taken to the police station for fighting an Irishman!' I am sorry to say that I don't find anybody to be much shocked by this liveliness." It is right to add what was said to me a few days later. "The Tribune is an excellent paper. Horace Greeley is editor in chief, and a considerable shareholder too. All the people connected with it whom I have seen are of the best class. It is also, a very fine property—but here the New York Herald beats it hollow, hollow, hollow! Another able and well edited paper is the New York Times. A most respectable journal too is Bryant's Evening Post, excellently written. There is generally a much more responsible and respectable tone than prevailed formerly, however small may be the literary merit, among papers pointed out to me as of large circulation. In much of the writing there is certainly improvement, but it might be more widely spread."[401]
A letter dated the 22nd to his sister-in-law mentioned the warm reception awaiting him upon his return to Boston, which really touched him. He found his rooms decorated with flowers and holly, real red berries, and draped in moss; the cozy Christmas feel of the place moved him. "There's a Captain Dolliver from the Boston customs who came on the little steamer that brought me back from Cuba. He decided to have a piece of English mistletoe brought over on this week's Cunard ship to put on my breakfast table. And there it was this morning. In these little affectionate gestures like this, the people of New England are especially kind. . . . As a general rule, you can assume that whatever you read about me in the papers isn’t true, but you can usually trust the Philadelphia correspondent of the Times, a well-informed gentleman. Our hotel in New York caught fire again the other night. But fires in this country are pretty routine. There was a big one in Boston at four this morning; and I don't think a single night has gone by since I’ve been under the protection of the Eagle without hearing the fire bells ringing sadly in both cities." The harsh criticism of his manager by parts of the press is the focus of the rest of the letter and is elaborated on in another letter of the same date to me. "A good example of the kind of newspaper you and I know something about came out in Boston this morning. The editor had requested our advertisements, saying that 'it was at Mr. D's disposal for paragraphs.' The ads weren't sent; Dolby didn't fill its columns with paragraphs; and among the news today is the story that 'this guy calling himself Dolby got drunk downtown last night and was taken to the police station for fighting an Irishman!' I'm sorry to say I don't find anyone shocked by this kind of sensationalism." It’s worth adding what was told to me a few days later. "The Tribune is a great paper. Horace Greeley is the editor-in-chief and a significant shareholder as well. All the people associated with it that I've met are top-notch. It’s also a very valuable property—but the New York Herald completely outshines it! Another strong and well-edited paper is the New York Times. Bryant's Evening Post is also a very respectable journal and excellently written. Generally, there’s a much more responsible and respectable tone than there used to be, regardless of how much literary merit there is, among the papers pointed out to me as having large circulation. There certainly is improvement in much of the writing, but it could be more widespread."
The time had now come when the course his Readings were to take independently of the two leading cities must be settled, and the general tour made out. His agent's original plan was that they should be in New York every week. "But I say No. By the 10th of January I shall have read to 35,000 people in that city alone. Put the readings out of the reach of all the people behind them, for the time. It is that one of the popular peculiarities which I most particularly notice, that they must not have a thing too easily. Nothing in the country lasts long; and a thing is prized the more, the less easy it is made. Reflecting therefore that I shall want to close, in April, with farewell readings here and in New York, I am convinced that the crush and pressure upon these necessary to their adequate success is only to be got by absence; and that the best thing I can do is not to give either city as much reading as it wants now, but to be independent of both while both are most enthusiastic. I have therefore resolved presently to announce in New York so many readings (I mean a certain number) as the last that can be given there, before I travel to promised places; and that we select the best places, with the largest halls, on our list. This will include, East here—the two or three best New England towns; South—Baltimore and Washington; West—Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, Chicago, and St. Louis; and towards Niagara—Cleveland and Buffalo. Philadelphia we are already pledged to, for six nights; and the scheme will pretty easily bring us here again twice before the farewells. I feel convinced that this is the sound policy." (It was afterwards a little modified, as will be seen, by public[402] occurrences and his own condition of health; the West, as well as a promise to Canada, having to be abandoned; but otherwise it was carried out.) "I read here to-morrow and Tuesday; all tickets being sold to the end of the series, even for subjects not announced. I have not read a single time at a lower clear profit per night (all deductions made) than £315. But rely upon it I shall take great care not to read oftener than four times a week—after this next week, when I stand committed to five. The inevitable tendency of the staff, when these great houses excite them, is, in the words of an old friend of ours, to 'hurge the hartist hon;' and a night or two ago I had to cut away five readings from their list."
The time had come to decide the independent path for his Readings, apart from the two main cities, and to finalize the tour plans. His agent originally suggested that they should be in New York every week. "But I say No. By January 10th, I will have read to 35,000 people in that city alone. Let’s keep the readings out of reach of those behind for now. I've really noticed that people don’t want things to be too easy. Nothing lasts long in this country, and we value things more when they aren't so easily available. Thinking ahead, I want to wrap up with farewell readings here and in New York in April, and I believe the excitement and interest needed for their success can only be achieved by taking a break. The best approach is not to give either city as many readings as they currently want, but to remain independent while the enthusiasm is high. I’ve decided to announce a certain number of final readings in New York before heading to confirmed locations, and we'll choose the best venues with the largest halls on our list. This includes a few top New England towns to the East; Baltimore and Washington to the South; Cincinnati, Pittsburgh, Chicago, and St. Louis to the West; and Cleveland and Buffalo towards Niagara. We’re already committed to six nights in Philadelphia, which will likely bring us back here twice before the farewells. I’m convinced this is the right strategy." (This plan was later slightly adjusted due to public events and his own health; the West, along with a promise to Canada, had to be dropped, but otherwise, it was carried out.) "I read here tomorrow and Tuesday; all tickets are sold out for the rest of the series, even for topics not announced. I haven't had a single performance with a lower clear profit per night (after all deductions) than £315. But trust me, I will be very careful not to read more than four times a week—after this next week when I’m committed to five. The staff’s inevitable tendency, when these big venues get them excited, is, as an old friend of ours would say, to 'urge the artist on;' and a couple of nights ago, I had to drop five readings from their list."
An incident at Boston should have mention before he resumes his readings in New York. In the interval since he was first in America, the Harvard professor of chemistry, Dr. Webster, whom he had at that visit met among the honoured men who held chairs in their Cambridge University, had been hanged for the murder, committed in his laboratory in the college, of a friend who had lent him money, portions of whose body lay concealed under the lid of the lecture-room table where the murderer continued to meet his students. "Being in Cambridge," Dickens wrote to Lord Lytton, "I thought I would go over the Medical School, and see the exact localities where Professor Webster did that amazing murder, and worked so hard to rid himself of the body of the murdered man. (I find there is of course no rational doubt that the Professor was always a secretly cruel man.) They were horribly grim, private, cold, and quiet; the identical furnace smelling[403] fearfully (some anatomical broth in it I suppose) as if the body were still there; jars of pieces of sour mortality standing about, like the forty robbers in Ali Baba after being scalded to death; and bodies near us ready to be carried in to next morning's lecture. At the house where I afterwards dined I heard an amazing and fearful story; told by one who had been at a dinner-party of ten or a dozen, at Webster's, less than a year before the murder. They began rather uncomfortably, in consequence of one of the guests (the victim of an instinctive antipathy) starting up with the sweat pouring down his face, and crying out, 'O Heaven! There's a cat somewhere in the room!' The cat was found and ejected, but they didn't get on very well. Left with their wine, they were getting on a little better; when Webster suddenly told the servants to turn the gas off and bring in that bowl of burning minerals which he had prepared, in order that the company might see how ghastly they looked by its weird light. All this was done, and every man was looking, horror-stricken, at his neighbour; when Webster was seen bending over the bowl with a rope round his neck, holding up the end of the rope, with his head on one side and his tongue lolled out, to represent a hanged man!"
An incident in Boston needs to be mentioned before he continues his readings in New York. Since he first visited America, the Harvard chemistry professor, Dr. Webster, whom he had previously met among the respected faculty at Cambridge University, was hanged for murdering a friend who had lent him money. Parts of this friend’s body were hidden under the lid of the lecture-room table, where the murderer still met with his students. "Being in Cambridge," Dickens wrote to Lord Lytton, "I thought I would check out the Medical School and see the exact places where Professor Webster committed that shocking murder and tried so hard to dispose of the murdered man's body. (I find there is, of course, no rational doubt that the Professor was always a secretly cruel man.) They were horrifyingly grim, private, cold, and quiet; the very furnace smelling[403] disturbingly (some anatomical broth in it, I suppose) as if the body were still there; jars containing bits of decaying flesh stood around, like the forty robbers in Ali Baba after being scalded to death; and bodies were nearby, ready to be taken in for the next morning's lecture. At the house where I later had dinner, I heard an astonishing and terrifying story told by someone who had attended a dinner party of ten or twelve at Webster's less than a year before the murder. The evening started off rather awkwardly because one of the guests (the future victim, feeling an instinctive dislike) suddenly jumped up with sweat pouring down his face, exclaiming, 'Oh Heaven! There’s a cat somewhere in the room!' The cat was found and removed, but the atmosphere remained tense. Left with their drinks, things were improving slightly when Webster abruptly instructed the servants to turn off the gas and bring in a bowl of burning minerals he had prepared, so the guests could see how ghastly they looked in its eerie light. This was done, and every man was horror-struck, staring at his neighbor; when Webster was seen leaning over the bowl, a rope around his neck, lifting the end of the rope with his head tilted and his tongue hanging out, mimicking a hanged man!"
Dickens read at Boston on the 23rd and the 24th of December, and on Christmas day travelled back to New York where he was to read on the 26th. The last words written before he left were of illness. "The low action of the heart, or whatever it is, has inconvenienced me greatly this last week. On Monday night, after the reading, I was laid upon a bed, in a very faint and shady state; and on the Tuesday I did not get up till[404] the afternoon." But what in reality was less grave took outwardly the form of a greater distress; and the effects of the cold which had struck him in travelling to Boston, as yet not known to his English friends, appear most to have alarmed those about him. I depart from my rule in this narrative, otherwise strictly observed, in singling out one of those friends for mention by name: but a business connection with the Readings, as well as untiring offices of personal kindness and sympathy, threw Mr. Fields into closer relations with Dickens from arrival to departure, than any other person had; and his description of the condition of health in which Dickens now quitted Boston and went through the rest of the labour he had undertaken, will be a sad though fit prelude to what the following chapter has to tell. "He went from Boston to New York carrying with him a severe catarrh contracted in our climate. He was quite ill from the effects of the disease; but he fought courageously against them. . . . His spirit was wonderful, and, although he lost all appetite and could partake of very little food, he was always cheerful and ready for his work when the evening came round. A dinner was tendered to him by some of his literary friends in Boston; but he was so ill the day before that the banquet had to be given up. The strain upon his strength and nerves was very great during all the months he remained, and only a man of iron will could have accomplished what he did. He was accustomed to talk and write a good deal about eating and drinking, but I have rarely seen a man eat and drink less. He liked to dilate in imagination over the brewing of a bowl of punch, but when the punch was ready he drank less of[405] it than any one who might be present. It was the sentiment of the thing and not the thing itself that engaged his attention. I scarcely saw him eat a hearty meal during his whole stay. Both at Parker's hotel in Boston, and at the Westminster in New York, everything was arranged by the proprietors for his comfort, and tempting dishes to pique his invalid appetite were sent up at different hours of the day; but the influenza had seized him with masterful power, and held the strong man down till he left the country."
Dickens read in Boston on December 23rd and 24th, and on Christmas day, he traveled back to New York where he was scheduled to read on the 26th. The last words he wrote before leaving were about his health. "The low action of the heart, or whatever it is, has really troubled me this past week. After the reading on Monday night, I ended up lying in bed, feeling very faint and unwell; I didn’t get up on Tuesday until[404] the afternoon." But what was actually less serious appeared to be a greater worry; the effects of the cold he caught while traveling to Boston, which his English friends were not yet aware of, seemed to worry those around him the most. I break my usual rule in this narrative by naming one of those friends: Mr. Fields had a business connection with the Readings and provided continuous personal kindness and support, which brought him closer to Dickens during his stay than anyone else. His account of Dickens’s health when he left Boston and continued with his commitments will be a sad yet fitting introduction to what the next chapter reveals. "He went from Boston to New York carrying a severe cold contracted in our climate. He was really sick from the illness; but he bravely fought through it. His spirit was remarkable, and even though he lost his appetite and could hardly eat anything, he remained cheerful and ready for work every evening. Some of his literary friends in Boston offered him a dinner, but he was so ill the day before that they had to cancel the banquet. The strain on his strength and nerves was immense during his entire stay, and only someone with tremendous willpower could have accomplished what he did. He often talked and wrote a lot about food and drink, but I rarely saw him eat or drink much. He liked to imagine the preparation of a bowl of punch, but when it was ready, he drank less of[405] it than anyone else present. It was the sentiment behind it that captured his attention, not the drink itself. I hardly saw him enjoy a full meal while he was there. Both at Parker's hotel in Boston and at the Westminster in New York, everything was set up by the owners for his comfort, with tempting dishes meant to stimulate his sick appetite being sent up at various times throughout the day; but the flu had him in its grip, keeping the strong man down until he left the country."
When he arrived in New York on the evening of Christmas Day he found a letter from his daughter. Answering her next day he told her: "I wanted it much, for I had a frightful cold (English colds are nothing to those of this country) and was very miserable. . . . It is a bad country to be unwell and travelling in. You are one of, say, a hundred people in a heated car with a great stove in it, all the little windows being closed; and the bumping and banging about are indescribable, the atmosphere detestable, the ordinary motion all but intolerable." The following day this addition was made to the letter. "I managed to read last night, but it was as much as I could do. To-day I am so very unwell that I have sent for a doctor. He has just been, and is in doubt whether I shall not have to stop reading for a while."
When he arrived in New York on Christmas evening, he found a letter from his daughter. The next day, he replied, saying: "I really wanted it because I caught a terrible cold (English colds are nothing compared to those here) and felt really miserable. . . . It's a tough place to be sick and traveling. You’re one of maybe a hundred people in a heated train car with a big stove, all the little windows shut; the bumps and jolts are indescribable, the air is awful, and even the regular motion is nearly unbearable." The following day, he added to the letter: "I managed to read last night, but it was all I could do. Today, I'm feeling so unwell that I called for a doctor. He just came and is unsure whether I might need to stop reading for a while."
His stronger will prevailed, and he went on without stopping. On the last day of the year he announced to us that though he had been very low he was getting right again; that in a couple of days he should have accomplished a fourth of the entire Readings; and that the first month of the new year would see him through[406] Philadelphia and Baltimore, as well as through two more nights in Boston. He also prepared his English friends for the startling intelligence they might shortly expect, of four readings coming off in a church, before an audience of two thousand people accommodated in pews, and with himself emerging from a vestry.
His stronger will won out, and he kept going without stopping. On the last day of the year, he told us that although he had been feeling very low, he was getting better; that in just a couple of days, he would have completed a fourth of all the Readings; and that the first month of the new year would take him through[406] Philadelphia and Baltimore, along with two more nights in Boston. He also got his English friends ready for the shocking news they could expect soon about four readings happening in a church, in front of an audience of two thousand people sitting in pews, with him coming out from a vestry.
CHAPTER XVI.
AMERICA REVISITED: JANUARY TO APRIL 1868.
1868.
The Reading on the third of January closed a fourth of the entire series, and on that day Dickens wrote of the trouble brought on them by the "speculators," which to some extent had affected unfavourably the three previous nights in New York. When adventurers buy up the best places, the public resent it by refusing the[408] worst; to prevent it by first helping themselves, being the last thing they ever think of doing. "We try to withhold the best seats from the speculators, but the unaccountable thing is that the great mass of the public buy of them (prefer it), and the rest of the public are injured if we have not got those very seats to sell them. We have now a travelling staff of six men, in spite of which Dolby, who is leaving me to-day to sell tickets in Philadelphia to-morrow morning, will no doubt get into a tempest of difficulties. Of course also, in such a matter, as many obstacles as possible are thrown in an Englishman's way; and he may himself be a little injudicious into the bargain. Last night, for instance, he met one of the 'ushers' (who show people to their seats) coming in with one of our men. It is against orders that any one employed in front should go out during the reading, and he took this man to task in the British manner. Instantly, the free and independent usher put on his hat and walked off. Seeing which, all the other free and independent ushers (some 20 in number) put on their hats and walked off; leaving us absolutely devoid and destitute of a staff for to-night. One has since been improvised: but it was a small matter to raise a stir and ill-will about, especially as one of our men was equally in fault; and really there is little to be done at night. American people are so accustomed to take care of themselves, that one of these immense audiences will fall into their places with an ease amazing to a frequenter of St. James's Hall; and the certainty with which they are all in, before I go on, is a very acceptable mark of respect. Our great labour is outside; and we have been obliged to bring our staff[409] up to six, besides a boy or two, by employment of a regular additional clerk, a Bostonian. The speculators buying the front-seats (we have found instances of this being done by merchants in good position), the public won't have the back seats; return their tickets; write and print volumes on the subject; and deter others from coming. You are not to suppose that this prevails to any great extent, as our lowest house here has been £300; but it does hit us. There is no doubt about it. Fortunately I saw the danger when the trouble began, and changed the list at the right time. . . . You may get an idea of the staff's work, by what is in hand now. They are preparing, numbering, and stamping, 6000 tickets for Philadelphia, and 8000 tickets for Brooklyn. The moment those are done, another 8000 tickets will be wanted for Baltimore, and probably another 6000 for Washington; and all this in addition to the correspondence, advertisements, accounts, travelling, and the nightly business of the Readings four times a week. . . . I cannot get rid of this intolerable cold! My landlord invented for me a drink of brandy, rum, and snow, called it a 'Rocky Mountain Sneezer,' and said it was to put down all less effectual sneezing; but it has not yet had the effect. Did I tell you that the favourite drink before you get up is an Eye-Opener? There has been another fall of snow, succeeded by a heavy thaw."
The Reading on January 3rd marked the end of a quarter of the entire series, and on that day Dickens mentioned the problems caused by the "speculators," which had negatively impacted the three previous nights in New York. When opportunists snap up the best seats, the public retaliates by refusing to buy the[408] worst; preventing this by grabbing the good ones for themselves is the last thing they ever consider doing. "We try to keep the best seats away from the speculators, but the strange thing is that the vast majority of the public buys from them (prefers them), and the rest of the public suffers if we don’t have those specific seats to sell. We now have a traveling staff of six men, but despite this, Dolby, who is leaving me today to sell tickets in Philadelphia tomorrow morning, will undoubtedly face a storm of difficulties. Naturally, in such matters, as many obstacles as possible are placed in an Englishman's path, and he may also be a bit imprudent. For instance, last night, he encountered one of the 'ushers' (who lead people to their seats) coming in with one of our men. It's against orders for anyone working in front to go out during the reading, and he reprimanded this man in the British style. Immediately, the free and independent usher put on his hat and walked out. Seeing this, all the other free and independent ushers (about 20 in total) followed suit, putting on their hats and leaving us completely without a staff for tonight. One has since been thrown together: but it wasn’t a small problem to create a fuss and ill will about it, especially since one of our men was equally at fault; and honestly, there's not much to be done at night. American audiences are so used to managing themselves that one of these massive audiences will settle into their seats with an ease that would astonish regulars at St. James's Hall; the certainty with which they settle in before I start is a very welcomed sign of respect. Our main challenges are outside; and we’ve had to expand our staff[409] to six, plus a boy or two, by hiring an additional clerk from Boston. The speculators buying the front seats (we’ve seen instances of this happening with reputable merchants) means the public won’t buy the back seats; they return their tickets, write and publish volumes on the issue, and discourage others from attending. Don't think this is a widespread issue, as our smallest audience here has been £300; but it does affect us. There's no denying it. Fortunately, I recognized the danger when the trouble started and changed the list at the right moment. . . . You can get an idea of what the staff is working on now. They are preparing, numbering, and stamping 6000 tickets for Philadelphia and 8000 tickets for Brooklyn. Once those are finished, another 8000 tickets will be needed for Baltimore, and probably another 6000 for Washington; all of this in addition to handling correspondence, advertisements, accounts, traveling, and the nightly business of the Readings four times a week. . . . I can't shake this horrible cold! My landlord came up with a drink of brandy, rum, and snow, calling it a 'Rocky Mountain Sneezer,' and claimed it would cure any sneezing; but it hasn’t helped yet. Did I mention that the favorite drink before you get up is an Eye-Opener? There’s been another snowfall followed by a heavy thaw."
The day after (the 4th) he went back to Boston, and next day wrote to me: "I am to read here on Monday and Tuesday, return to New York on Wednesday, and finish there (except the farewells in April) on Thursday and Friday. The New York reading of[410] Doctor Marigold made really a tremendous hit. The people doubted at first, having evidently not the least idea what could be done with it, and broke out at last into a perfect chorus of delight. At the end they made a great shout, and gave a rush towards the platform as if they were going to carry me off. It puts a strong additional arrow into my quiver. Another extraordinary success has been Nickleby and Boots at the Holly Tree (appreciated here in Boston, by the bye, even more than Copperfield); and think of our last New York night bringing £500 English into the house, after making more than the necessary deduction for the present price of gold! The manager is always going about with an immense bundle that looks like a sofa-cushion, but is in reality paper-money, and it had risen to the proportions of a sofa on the morning he left for Philadelphia. Well, the work is hard, the climate is hard, the life is hard: but so far the gain is enormous. My cold steadily refuses to stir an inch. It distresses me greatly at times, though it is always good enough to leave me for the needful two hours. I have tried allopathy, homœopathy, cold things, warm things, sweet things, bitter things, stimulants, narcotics, all with the same result. Nothing will touch it."
The day after the 4th, he went back to Boston and wrote to me the next day: "I'm scheduled to read here on Monday and Tuesday, then return to New York on Wednesday, and wrap up there (except for the farewells in April) on Thursday and Friday. The New York reading of [410] Doctor Marigold was a huge success. People were skeptical at first, having no idea what to expect, but eventually erupted into cheers of excitement. At the end, they shouted loudly and rushed toward the platform as if they were going to carry me off. It's a strong addition to my arsenal. Another amazing success has been Nickleby and Boots at the Holly Tree (which, by the way, was appreciated here in Boston even more than Copperfield); and can you believe our last night in New York brought in £500 English, even after making more than the necessary deduction for the current price of gold? The manager is always walking around with a massive bundle that looks like a sofa cushion but is actually paper money, and it had grown to the size of a sofa by the morning he left for Philadelphia. Well, the work is tough, the climate is tough, the life is tough: but so far the rewards are huge. My cold refuses to budge at all. It really bothers me at times, although it’s kind enough to leave me for the essential two hours. I've tried all kinds of treatments—allopathy, homeopathy, cold things, warm things, sweet things, bitter things, stimulants, narcotics—everything with the same outcome. Nothing seems to work."
In the same letter, light was thrown on the ecclesiastical mystery. "At Brooklyn I am going to read in Mr. Ward Beecher's chapel: the only building there available for the purpose. You must understand that Brooklyn is a kind of sleeping-place for New York, and is supposed to be a great place in the money way. We let the seats pew by pew! the pulpit is taken down for my screen and gas! and I appear out of the vestry[411] in canonical form! These ecclesiastical entertainments come off on the evenings of the 16th, 17th, 20th, and 21st, of the present month." His first letter after returning to New York (9th of January) made additions to the Brooklyn picture. "Each evening an enormous ferry-boat will convey me and my state-carriage (not to mention half a dozen wagons and any number of people and a few score of horses) across the river to Brooklyn, and will bring me back again. The sale of tickets there was an amazing scene. The noble army of speculators are now furnished (this is literally true, and I am quite serious) each man with a straw mattress, a little bag of bread and meat, two blankets, and a bottle of whiskey. With this outfit, they lie down in line on the pavement the whole of the night before the tickets are sold: generally taking up their position at about 10. It being severely cold at Brooklyn, they made an immense bonfire in the street—a narrow street of wooden houses—which the police turned out to extinguish. A general fight then took place; from which the people farthest off in the line rushed bleeding when they saw any chance of ousting others nearer the door, put their mattresses in the spots so gained, and held on by the iron rails. At 8 in the morning Dolby appeared with the tickets in a portmanteau. He was immediately saluted with a roar of Halloa! Dolby! So Charley has let you have the carriage, has he, Dolby? How is he, Dolby? Don't drop the tickets, Dolby! Look alive, Dolby! &c. &c. &c. in the midst of which he proceeded to business, and concluded (as usual) by giving universal dissatisfaction. He is now going off upon a little journey to look over the ground and cut back[412] again. This little journey (to Chicago) is twelve hundred miles on end, by railway, besides the back again!" It might tax the Englishman, but was nothing to the native American. It was part of his New York landlord's ordinary life in a week, Dickens told me, to go to Chicago and look at his theatre there on a Monday; to pelt back to Boston and look at his theatre there on a Thursday; and to come rushing to New York on a Friday, to apostrophize his enormous ballet.
In the same letter, he shed light on the church mystery. "In Brooklyn, I’m going to speak at Mr. Ward Beecher's chapel, the only place available for it. You have to understand that Brooklyn is like a bedroom for New York, and it’s thought to be a great place for making money. We rent the seats one by one! The pulpit is taken down for my screen and gas! I appear out of the back room in my ceremonial outfit! These church events will happen on the evenings of the 16th, 17th, 20th, and 21st of this month." His first letter after getting back to New York (January 9th) added more to the Brooklyn picture. "Every evening, a huge ferry will take me and my fancy carriage (not to mention half a dozen wagons and a bunch of people, plus a few dozen horses) across the river to Brooklyn and bring me back. The ticket sale there was quite a scene. The noble group of speculators are literally provided with a straw mattress, a small bag of bread and meat, two blankets, and a bottle of whiskey. With this setup, they lie down on the pavement all night before the tickets go on sale, usually showing up around 10. Since it’s freezing in Brooklyn, they built a huge bonfire in the street—a narrow street lined with wooden houses—which the police came to put out. A big fight broke out; the people farthest from the line rushed in, bleeding, when they saw a chance to push others away from the door, put their mattresses in the spots they gained, and held on to the iron rails. By 8 in the morning, Dolby showed up with the tickets in a suitcase. He was immediately greeted with a shout of "Hey! Dolby! So Charley let you have the carriage, huh, Dolby? How’s he doing, Dolby? Don’t drop the tickets, Dolby! Get a move on, Dolby!" and so on while he got down to business and ended up (as usual) causing universal dissatisfaction. He’s heading off on a little trip to check things out and come back again. This little journey (to Chicago) is twelve hundred miles one way by train, not including the return trip!" It might be a lot for a British person, but it was nothing to the average American. Dickens told me that for his New York landlord, it was just another week to go to Chicago and check his theater there on a Monday, rush back to Boston to check his theater there on a Thursday, and then dash back to New York on a Friday to deal with his huge ballet.
Three days later, still at New York, he wrote to his sister-in-law. "I am off to Philadelphia this evening for the first of three visits of two nights each, tickets for all being sold. My cold steadily refuses to leave me, but otherwise I am as well as I can hope to be under this heavy work. My New York readings are over (except the farewell nights), and I look forward to the relief of being out of my hardest hall. On Friday I was again dead beat at the end, and was once more laid upon a sofa. But the faintness went off after a little while. We have now cold bright frosty weather, without snow; the best weather for me." Next day from Philadelphia he wrote to his daughter that he was lodged in The Continental, one of the most immense of American hotels, but that he found himself just as quiet as elsewhere. "Everything is very good, my waiter is German, and the greater part of the servants seem to be coloured people. The town is very clean, and the day as blue and bright as a fine Italian day. But it freezes very very hard, and my cold is not improved; for the cars were so intolerably hot that I was often obliged to stand upon the brake outside, and then the frosty air bit me indeed. I find it necessary (so[413] oppressed am I with this American catarrh as they call it) to dine at three o'clock instead of four, that I may have more time to get voice; so that the days are cut short and letter-writing not easy."
Three days later, still in New York, he wrote to his sister-in-law. "I'm heading to Philadelphia this evening for the first of three visits, each lasting two nights, and all the tickets are sold. My cold just won’t go away, but other than that, I’m doing as well as I can expect given this heavy workload. My New York readings are done (except for the farewell nights), and I’m looking forward to the relief of being out of my toughest venue. On Friday, I was completely wiped out at the end and had to lie down on a sofa again. But the dizziness faded after a while. We're currently experiencing cold, bright, frosty weather, with no snow; it's the best weather for me." The next day, from Philadelphia, he wrote to his daughter that he was staying at The Continental, one of the largest hotels in America, but he found it just as quiet as anywhere else. "Everything is very good; my waiter is German, and most of the staff seem to be people of color. The town is very clean, and the day is as blue and bright as a beautiful Italian day. But it’s freezing cold, and my cold hasn’t improved; the train cars were unbearably hot, so I often had to stand on the brake outside, and the icy air really got to me. I find it necessary (I’m so[413] overwhelmed by this American cold, as they call it) to eat dinner at three o’clock instead of four, so I have more time to regain my voice; this means the days feel shorter, and writing letters isn’t easy."
He nevertheless found time in this city to write to me (14th of January) the most interesting mention he had yet made of such opinions as he had been able to form during his present visit, apart from the pursuit that absorbed him. Of such of those opinions as were given on a former page, it is only necessary to repeat that while the tone of party politics still impressed him unfavourably, he had thus far seen everywhere great changes for the better socially. I will add other points from the same letter. That he was unfortunate in his time of visiting New York, as far as its politics were concerned, what has since happened conclusively shows. "The Irish element is acquiring such enormous influence in New York city, that when I think of it, and see the large Roman Catholic cathedral rising there, it seems unfair to stigmatise as 'American' other monstrous things that one also sees. But the general corruption in respect of the local funds appears to be stupendous, and there is an alarming thing as to some of the courts of law which I am afraid is native-born. A case came under my notice the other day in which it was perfectly plain, from what was said to me by a person interested in resisting an injunction, that his first proceeding had been to 'look up the Judge.'" Of such occasional provincial oddity, harmless in itself but strange in large cities, as he noticed in the sort of half disappointment at the small fuss made by himself about the Readings, and in the newspaper references to[414] "Mr. Dickens's extraordinary composure" on the platform, he gives an illustration. "Last night here in Philadelphia (my first night), a very impressible and responsive audience were so astounded by my simply walking in and opening my book that I wondered what was the matter. They evidently thought that there ought to have been a flourish, and Dolby sent in to prepare for me. With them it is the simplicity of the operation that raises wonder. With the newspapers 'Mr. Dickens's extraordinary composure' is not reasoned out as being necessary to the art of the thing, but is sensitively watched with a lurking doubt whether it may not imply disparagement of the audience. Both these things strike me as drolly expressive." . . .
He still managed to find time in the city to write to me (January 14th) about the most interesting views he had formed during his visit, aside from the work that consumed him. Regarding the opinions mentioned earlier, it’s important to note that while the tone of party politics continued to leave a negative impression on him, he had noticed significant social improvements everywhere. I'll include some other points from the same letter. He felt he was unlucky with his timing in visiting New York, especially concerning its politics, as subsequent events have clearly shown. "The Irish community is gaining such massive influence in New York City that when I think about it and see the large Roman Catholic cathedral rising there, it seems unfair to label other bizarre things as 'American.' However, the general corruption related to local funds appears to be enormous, and there's something troubling about some of the courts that I fear might be an issue native to the area. A case came to my attention the other day where it was pretty clear, from what someone involved in opposing an injunction told me, that his first step had been to 'look up the Judge.'" He also observed occasional quirky behaviors that, while harmless, seemed strange in large cities. For example, he mentioned the mild disappointment in how little fuss was made about him concerning the Readings, and the newspaper comments about[414] "Mr. Dickens's extraordinary composure" on stage. "Last night here in Philadelphia (my first night), a very emotional and engaged audience was so shocked by my simply walking in and opening my book that I wondered what was going on. They clearly believed there should have been a grand introduction, and Dolby was sent in to prepare for me. For them, it’s the simplicity of the act that creates astonishment. With the newspapers, 'Mr. Dickens's extraordinary composure' isn't scrutinized to see if it's essential to the performance; instead, it's closely observed with a hidden worry that it might suggest a lack of respect for the audience. Both of these things strike me as amusingly revealing."
His testimony as to improved social habits and ways was expressed very decidedly. "I think it reasonable to expect that as I go westward, I shall find the old manners going on before me, and may tread upon their skirts mayhap. But so far, I have had no more intrusion or boredom than I have when I lead the same life in England. I write this in an immense hotel, but I am as much at peace in my own rooms, and am left as wholly undisturbed, as if I were at the Station Hotel in York. I have now read in New York city to 40,000 people, and am quite as well known in the streets there as I am in London. People will turn back, turn again and face me, and have a look at me, or will say to one another 'Look here! Dickens coming!' But no one ever stops me or addresses me. Sitting reading in the carriage outside the New York post-office while one of the staff was stamping the letters inside, I became conscious that a few people who had been looking at the[415] turn-out had discovered me within. On my peeping out good-humouredly, one of them (I should say a merchant's book-keeper) stepped up to the door, took off his hat, and said in a frank way: 'Mr. Dickens, I should very much like to have the honour of shaking hands with you'—and, that done, presented two others. Nothing could be more quiet or less intrusive. In the railway cars, if I see anybody who clearly wants to speak to me, I usually anticipate the wish by speaking myself. If I am standing on the brake outside (to avoid the intolerable stove), people getting down will say with a smile: 'As I am taking my departure, Mr. Dickens, and can't trouble you for more than a moment, I should like to take you by the hand sir.' And so we shake hands and go our ways. . . . Of course many of my impressions come through the readings. Thus I find the people lighter and more humorous than formerly; and there must be a great deal of innocent imagination among every class, or they never could pet with such extraordinary pleasure as they do, the Boots' story of the elopement of the two little children. They seem to see the children; and the women set up a shrill undercurrent of half-pity and half-pleasure that is quite affecting. To-night's reading is my 26th; but as all the Philadelphia tickets for four more are sold, as well as four at Brooklyn, you must assume that I am at—say—my 35th reading. I have remitted to Coutts's in English gold £10,000 odd; and I roughly calculate that on this number Dolby will have another thousand pounds profit to pay me. These figures are of course between ourselves, at present; but are they not magnificent? The expenses, always recollect, are[416] enormous. On the other hand we never have occasion to print a bill of any sort (bill-printing and posting are great charges at home); and have just now sold off £90 worth of bill-paper, provided beforehand, as a wholly useless incumbrance."
His testimony about improved social habits and ways was very clear. "I think it’s reasonable to expect that as I head west, I’ll find the old customs still in place and maybe even bump into them. But so far, I’ve had just as much intrusion or boredom as I do when living the same life in England. I’m writing this from a huge hotel, but I feel as relaxed in my own rooms here as I would at the Station Hotel in York. I’ve now read to 40,000 people in New York City, and I’m just as recognizable on the streets there as I am in London. People will double back, turn around, and look at me, saying to each other, 'Look! It’s Dickens!' But no one ever stops to talk to me. While sitting and reading in the carriage outside the New York post office, as one of the staff was stamping letters inside, I noticed a few people who had been looking at my carriage realized I was inside. When I peeked out cheerfully, one of them (a merchant's bookkeeper, I would say) stepped up to the door, took off his hat, and said straightforwardly: 'Mr. Dickens, I’d really like the honor of shaking hands with you'—and after that, he introduced two others. It couldn’t have been more quiet or less intrusive. In the train cars, if I see someone who clearly wants to talk to me, I usually beat them to it by speaking first. If I’m standing on the platform outside (to escape the unbearable heat), people getting off will smile and say: 'As I’m leaving, Mr. Dickens, and can’t take up too much of your time, I’d like to shake your hand, sir.' And so we shake hands and go our separate ways... Of course, many of my impressions come from the readings. I’ve found the people to be lighter and more humorous than before; there must be a lot of innocent imagination among every class, or else they couldn’t enjoy the Boots’ story of the two little kids running away as much as they do. They seem to picture the children, and the women create a blend of shrill half-pity and half-pleasure that’s quite touching. Tonight’s reading will be my 26th; but since all the Philadelphia tickets for the next four are sold out, along with four in Brooklyn, you can assume that I’m at—let’s say—my 35th reading. I’ve sent over £10,000 in English gold to Coutts's; and I roughly estimate that Dolby will have another thousand pounds in profit to pay me. These numbers are, of course, just between us for now; but aren’t they impressive? The expenses, always remember, are enormous. On the other hand, we never have to print a bill of any kind (bill printing and mailing are significant costs back home); and right now we’ve sold off £90 worth of bill paper we had on hand, which was entirely unnecessary.”
Then came, as ever, the constant shadow that still attended him, the slave in the chariot of his triumph. "The work is very severe. There is now no chance of my being rid of this American catarrh until I embark for England. It is very distressing. It likewise happens, not seldom, that I am so dead beat when I come off that they lay me down on a sofa after I have been washed and dressed, and I lie there, extremely faint, for a quarter of an hour. In that time I rally and come right." One week later from New York, where he had become due on the 16th for the first of his four Brooklyn readings, he wrote to his sister-in-law. "My cold sticks to me, and I can scarcely exaggerate what I undergo from sleeplessness. I rarely take any breakfast but an egg and a cup of tea—not even toast or bread and butter. My small dinner at 3, and a little quail or some such light thing when I come home at night, is my daily fare; and at the hall I have established the custom of taking an egg beaten up in sherry before going in, and another between the parts, which I think pulls me up. . . . It is snowing hard now, and I begin to move to-morrow. There is so much floating ice in the river, that we are obliged to have a pretty wide margin of time for getting over the ferry to read." The last of the readings over the ferry was on the day when this letter was written. "I finished at my church to-night. It is Mrs. Stowe's brother's, and a most[417] wonderful place to speak in. We had it enormously full last night (Marigold and Trial), but it scarcely required an effort. Mr. Ward Beecher being present in his pew, I sent to invite him to come round before he left. I found him to be an unostentatious, evidently able, straightforward, and agreeable man; extremely well-informed, and with a good knowledge of art."
Then came, as always, the constant shadow that accompanied him, the burden rider in his chariot of success. "The work is very intense. There’s no chance of me getting rid of this American cold until I head back to England. It’s really upsetting. It often happens that I feel so exhausted after finishing that they have to lay me down on a sofa after I’ve been cleaned up and dressed, and I lay there, feeling extremely faint, for about fifteen minutes. During that time, I recover and feel better." One week later from New York, where he was scheduled on the 16th for the first of his four Brooklyn readings, he wrote to his sister-in-law. "My cold is persistent, and I can hardly emphasize how much I'm suffering from sleeplessness. I rarely have breakfast more than an egg and a cup of tea—not even toast or bread and butter. My small dinner is at 3, and I have a little quail or something light when I get home at night; that’s my daily meals. At the hall, I have started the habit of having an egg beaten in sherry before going in, and another one between the acts, which I think helps me. . . . It’s snowing heavily now, and I start moving tomorrow. There’s so much floating ice in the river that we need to have a pretty large buffer of time to make it across the ferry for the reading." The last reading over the ferry was on the day this letter was written. "I finished at my church tonight. It’s Mrs. Stowe’s brother's, and a truly[417] amazing place to speak in. We had it hugely full last night (Marigold and Trial), but it didn’t really take much effort. With Mr. Ward Beecher present in his pew, I sent to invite him to come around before he left. I found him to be a humble, clearly capable, straightforward, and pleasant man; extremely knowledgeable, with a good understanding of art."
Baltimore and Washington were the cities in which he was now, on quitting New York, to read for the first time; and as to the latter some doubts arose. The exceptional course had been taken in regard to it, of selecting a hall with space for not more than 700 and charging everybody five dollars; to which Dickens, at first greatly opposed, had yielded upon use of the argument, "you have more people at New York, thanks to the speculators, paying more than five dollars every night." But now other suggestions came. "Horace Greeley dined with me last Saturday," he wrote on the 20th, "and didn't like my going to Washington, now full of the greatest rowdies and worst kind of people in the States. Last night at eleven came B. expressing like doubts; and though they may be absurd I thought them worth attention, B. coming so close on Greeley." Mr. Dolby was in consequence sent express to Washington with power to withdraw or go on, as enquiry on the spot might dictate; and Dickens took the additional resolve so far to modify the last arrangements of his tour as to avoid the distances of Chicago, St. Louis, and Cincinnati, to content himself with smaller places and profits, and thereby to get home nearly a month earlier. He was at Philadelphia on the 23rd of January, when he announced this intention.[418] "The worst of it is, that everybody one advises with has a monomania respecting Chicago. 'Good heavens sir,' the great Philadelphia authority said to me this morning, 'if you don't read in Chicago the people will go into fits!' Well, I answered, I would rather they went into fits than I did. But he didn't seem to see it at all."
Baltimore and Washington were the cities where he was now, after leaving New York, going to read for the first time; and about the latter, some doubts came up. An unusual choice had been made regarding it, selecting a venue that could hold no more than 700 people and charging everyone five dollars; Dickens, who was initially very opposed, eventually agreed with the reasoning, "You have more people in New York, thanks to the speculators, paying more than five dollars every night." But now other ideas surfaced. "Horace Greeley had dinner with me last Saturday," he wrote on the 20th, "and he didn't like my plans to go to Washington, which is now full of the rowdiest and worst kind of people in the country. Last night at eleven, B. expressed similar concerns; and although they might be absurd, I thought they were worth considering, especially coming so soon after Greeley." Mr. Dolby was therefore sent straight to Washington with the authority to either withdraw or proceed, depending on the situation there; and Dickens made the additional decision to adjust his tour plans to skip the long distances to Chicago, St. Louis, and Cincinnati, opting for smaller towns and smaller profits, so he could get home nearly a month sooner. He was in Philadelphia on January 23rd when he announced this plan.[418] "The worst part is, that everyone I consult has a singular obsession with Chicago. 'Good heavens sir,' the top authority from Philadelphia told me this morning, 'if you don't read in Chicago, the people will go into fits!' Well, I replied, I would rather they went into fits than I did. But he didn't seem to understand that at all."
From Baltimore he wrote to his sister-in-law on the 29th, in the hour's interval he had to spare before going back to Philadelphia. "It has been snowing hard for four and twenty hours—though this place is as far south as Valentia in Spain; and my manager, being on his way to New York, has a good chance of being snowed up somewhere. This is one of the places where Butler carried it with a high hand during the war, and where the ladies used to spit when they passed a Northern soldier. They are very handsome women, with an Eastern touch in them, and dress brilliantly. I have rarely seen so many fine faces in an audience. They are a bright responsive people likewise, and very pleasant to read to. My hall is a charming little opera house built by a society of Germans; quite a delightful place for the purpose. I stand on the stage, with the drop curtain down, and my screen before it. The whole scene is very pretty and complete, and the audience have a 'ring' in them that sounds deeper than the ear. I go from here to Philadelphia, to read to-morrow night and Friday; come through here again on Saturday on my way back to Washington; come back here on Saturday week for two finishing nights; then go to Philadelphia for two farewells—and so turn my back on the southern part of the country. Our new[419] plan will give 82 readings in all." (The real number was 76, six having been dropped on subsequent political excitements.) "Of course I afterwards discovered that we had finally settled the list on a Friday. I shall be halfway through it at Washington; of course on a Friday also, and my birthday." To myself he wrote on the following day from Philadelphia, beginning with a thank Heaven that he had struck off Canada and the West, for he found the wear and tear "enormous." "Dolby decided that the croakers were wrong about Washington, and went on; the rather as his raised prices, which he put finally at three dollars each, gave satisfaction. Fields is so confident about Boston, that my remaining list includes, in all, 14 more readings there. I don't know how many more we might not have had here (where I have had attentions otherwise that have been very grateful to me), if we had chosen. Tickets are now being resold at ten dollars each. At Baltimore I had a charming little theatre, and a very apprehensive impulsive audience. It is remarkable to see how the Ghost of Slavery haunts the town; and how the shambling, untidy, evasive, and postponing Irrepressible proceeds about his free work, going round and round it, instead of at it. The melancholy absurdity of giving these people votes, at any rate at present, would glare at one out of every roll of their eyes, chuckle in their mouths, and bump in their heads, if one did not see (as one cannot help seeing in the country) that their enfranchisement is a mere party trick to get votes. Being at the Penitentiary the other day (this, while we mention votes), and looking over the books, I noticed that almost every man had been[420] 'pardoned' a day or two before his time was up. Why? Because, if he had served his time out, he would have been ipso facto disfranchised. So, this form of pardon is gone through to save his vote; and as every officer of the prison holds his place only in right of his party, of course his hopeful clients vote for the party that has let them out! When I read in Mr. Beecher's church at Brooklyn, we found the trustees had suppressed the fact that a certain upper gallery holding 150 was 'the Coloured Gallery,' On the first night not a soul could be induced to enter it; and it was not until it became known next day that I was certainly not going to read there more than four times, that we managed to fill it. One night at New York, on our second or third row, there were two well-dressed women with a tinge of colour—I should say, not even quadroons. But the holder of one ticket who found his seat to be next them, demanded of Dolby 'what he meant by fixing him next to those two Gord darmed cusses of niggers?' and insisted on being supplied with another good place. Dolby firmly replied that he was perfectly certain Mr. Dickens would not recognize such an objection on any account, but he could have his money back, if he chose. Which, after some squabbling, he had. In a comic scene in the New York Circus one night, when I was looking on, four white people sat down upon a form in a barber's shop to be shaved. A coloured man came as the fifth customer, and the four immediately ran away. This was much laughed at and applauded. In the Baltimore Penitentiary, the white prisoners dine on one side of the room, the coloured prisoners on the other; and no one has the slightest idea of mixing[421] them. But it is indubitably the fact that exhalations not the most agreeable arise from a number of coloured people got together, and I was obliged to beat a quick retreat from their dormitory. I strongly believe that they will die out of this country fast. It seems, looking at them, so manifestly absurd to suppose it possible that they can ever hold their own against a restless, shifty, striving, stronger race."
From Baltimore, he wrote to his sister-in-law on the 29th during the brief time he had before heading back to Philadelphia. "It has been snowing heavily for twenty-four hours—despite this place being as far south as Valentia in Spain; and my manager, on his way to New York, might get caught in the snow somewhere. This is one of the places where Butler had a strong presence during the war, and where women would spit when passing a Northern soldier. The women here are very beautiful, with an Eastern flair, and they dress brightly. I’ve rarely seen so many attractive faces in an audience. They’re also a lively and responsive crowd, making them a pleasure to read to. My venue is a lovely little opera house built by a society of Germans; it’s quite delightful for this purpose. I stand on stage, with the drop curtain down and my screen in front of it. The whole scene is very pretty and complete, and the audience has a 'ring' that resonates more deeply than sound alone. I’ll go from here to Philadelphia to read tomorrow night and Friday; I’ll be back here again on Saturday on my way to Washington; then I’ll return here the Saturday after for two finishing nights; after that, I’ll go to Philadelphia for two farewell readings—and then leave the southern part of the country behind. Our new plan will have a total of 82 readings." (The actual number was 76, as six had been canceled due to subsequent political events.) "Of course, I later found out we finalized the list on a Friday. I’ll be halfway through it in Washington; also on a Friday and on my birthday." The next day, he wrote to himself from Philadelphia, starting with a thankfulness that he had removed Canada and the West from his schedule, as he found the strain "enormous." "Dolby decided that the pessimists were wrong about Washington and pressed on; notably, because his raised ticket prices, which he eventually set at three dollars each, were satisfactory. Fields is so confident about Boston that my remaining schedule there includes 14 more readings. I don’t know how many more we could have had here (where I’ve received other attentions that I truly appreciate), had we chosen to pursue it. Tickets are now being resold for ten dollars each. In Baltimore, I had a delightful little theater and a very eager audience. It's striking to see how the shadow of Slavery lingers in the town; and how the reluctant, disorganized, evasive Irrepressible goes about his work, circling around it instead of confronting it directly. The tragic absurdity of giving these individuals the right to vote, at least at present, is glaringly evident in their shifting eyes, sneering smiles, and baffled expressions, if one doesn't see (which is hard not to in this country) that their enfranchisement is just a political maneuver to secure votes. I visited the Penitentiary the other day (since we're talking about votes), and while reviewing the records, I noticed that nearly every man had been 'pardoned' a day or two before his sentence ended. Why? Because serving out his complete term would have automatically disenfranchised him. So, this process of pardon is performed to preserve his voting rights; and since every prison officer holds their position only because of their political party, naturally, their hopeful clients vote for the party that released them! When I read in Mr. Beecher’s church in Brooklyn, we discovered that the trustees had hidden the fact that a certain upper gallery holding 150 seats was 'the Colored Gallery.' On the first night, no one would step foot in it; it wasn’t until word spread the next day that I definitely wouldn’t read there more than four times that we managed to fill it. One night in New York, in our second or third row, there were two well-dressed women with a touch of color—I would say, not even quadroons. The holder of one ticket, who found his seat next to them, demanded of Dolby 'what he meant by seating him next to those two d--- black women?' and insisted on being given another good spot. Dolby firmly replied that he was quite sure Mr. Dickens wouldn't find such an objection acceptable, but he could have his money back if he wanted. After some arguing, he took the refund. In a comedic moment at the New York Circus one night, I watched as four white people sat down on a bench in a barber’s shop to get shaved. A Black man arrived as the fifth customer, and the four promptly fled. This was met with laughter and applause. In the Baltimore Penitentiary, white prisoners eat on one side of the room, while Black prisoners eat on the other; and nobody has any desire to mix them. However, it’s an undeniable fact that less-than-pleasant odors do arise from a group of Black people gathered together, and I had to make a quick exit from their dormitory. I truly believe they will rapidly decline in this country. It seems, from my observations, utterly absurd to think they could ever hold their own against a restless, flexible, ambitious, and stronger race."
On the fourth of February he wrote from Washington. "You may like to have a line to let you know that it is all right here, and that the croakers were simply ridiculous. I began last night. A charming audience, no dissatisfaction whatever at the raised prices, nothing missed or lost, cheers at the end of the Carol, and rounds upon rounds of applause all through. All the foremost men and their families had taken tickets for the series of four. A small place to read in. £300 in it." It will be no violation of the rule of avoiding private detail if the very interesting close of this letter is given. Its anecdote of President Lincoln was repeatedly told by Dickens after his return, and I am under no necessity to withhold from it the authority of Mr. Sumner's name. "I am going to-morrow to see the President, who has sent to me twice. I dined with Charles Sumner last Sunday, against my rule; and as I had stipulated for no party, Mr. Secretary Stanton was the only other guest, besides his own secretary. Stanton is a man with a very remarkable memory, and extraordinarily familiar with my books. . . . He and Sumner having been the first two public men at the dying President's bedside, and having remained with him until he breathed his last, we fell into a very interesting[422] conversation after dinner, when, each of them giving his own narrative separately, the usual discrepancies about details of time were observable. Then Mr. Stanton told me a curious little story which will form the remainder of this short letter.
On February 4th, he wrote from Washington. "I thought you might like to know that everything is going well here and that the naysayers were just being ridiculous. I started last night. The audience was lovely, and there was no dissatisfaction at the higher prices—nothing was missed or lost, cheers at the end of the Carol, and rounds of applause throughout. All the important people and their families bought tickets for the four-show series. It’s a small venue to read in. £300 in it." It won’t break the rule of avoiding private details to share the very interesting ending of this letter. Its story about President Lincoln was often recounted by Dickens after he got back, and I don’t need to keep Mr. Sumner’s name from it. "Tomorrow, I'm going to see the President, who has reached out to me twice. I had dinner with Charles Sumner last Sunday, which I usually avoid; and since I asked for no gathering, Mr. Secretary Stanton was the only other guest, along with his secretary. Stanton has an incredible memory and is exceptionally familiar with my books... They were the first two public figures by the dying President’s bedside and stayed with him until he breathed his last. After dinner, we had a really interesting conversation, where each of them shared their own accounts separately, revealing the usual differences in details about the timing. Then Mr. Stanton told me a curious little story that will make up the rest of this short letter."
"On the afternoon of the day on which the President was shot, there was a cabinet council at which he presided. Mr. Stanton, being at the time commander-in-chief of the Northern troops that were concentrated about here, arrived rather late. Indeed they were waiting for him, and on his entering the room, the President broke off in something he was saying, and remarked: 'Let us proceed to business, gentlemen.' Mr. Stanton then noticed, with great surprise, that the President sat with an air of dignity in his chair instead of lolling about it in the most ungainly attitudes, as his invariable custom was; and that instead of telling irrelevant or questionable stories, he was grave and calm, and quite a different man. Mr. Stanton, on leaving the council with the Attorney-General, said to him, 'That is the most satisfactory cabinet meeting I have attended for many a long day! What an extraordinary change in Mr. Lincoln!' The Attorney-General replied, 'We all saw it, before you came in. While we were waiting for you, he said, with his chin down on his breast, "Gentlemen, something very extraordinary is going to happen, and that very soon."' To which the Attorney-General had observed, 'Something good, sir, I hope?' when the President answered very gravely: 'I don't know; I don't know. But it will happen, and shortly too!' As they were all impressed by his manner, the Attorney-General took him[423] up again: 'Have you received any information, sir, not yet disclosed to us?' 'No,' answered the President: 'but I have had a dream. And I have now had the same dream three times. Once, on the night preceding the Battle of Bull Run. Once, on the night preceding' such another (naming a battle also not favourable to the North). His chin sank on his breast again, and he sat reflecting. 'Might one ask the nature of this dream, sir?' said the Attorney-General. 'Well,' replied the President, without lifting his head or changing his attitude, 'I am on a great broad rolling river—and I am in a boat—and I drift—and I drift!—But this is not business—' suddenly raising his face and looking round the table as Mr. Stanton entered, 'let us proceed to business, gentlemen.' Mr. Stanton and the Attorney-General said, as they walked on together, it would be curious to notice whether anything ensued on this; and they agreed to notice. He was shot that night."
"On the afternoon of the day the President was shot, there was a cabinet meeting that he led. Mr. Stanton, who was then the commander-in-chief of the Northern troops gathered nearby, arrived a bit late. They were actually waiting for him, and when he walked into the room, the President stopped what he was saying and remarked, 'Let’s get to business, gentlemen.' Mr. Stanton then noticed, with great surprise, that the President sat with a dignified posture in his chair instead of slumping in the most awkward positions, as was his usual habit; and that instead of sharing irrelevant or questionable stories, he was serious and composed, completely different from his normal self. After leaving the meeting with the Attorney-General, Mr. Stanton said, 'That’s the most satisfying cabinet meeting I’ve attended in a long time! What an incredible change in Mr. Lincoln!' The Attorney-General replied, 'We all noticed it before you arrived. While we were waiting for you, he said, with his chin down on his chest, "Gentlemen, something very extraordinary is going to happen, and very soon." To which I asked, 'Something good, sir, I hope?' and the President responded very seriously: 'I don’t know; I don’t know. But it will happen, and soon too!' They were all struck by his demeanor, and the Attorney-General asked him again, 'Have you received any information that hasn’t been disclosed to us?' 'No,' the President replied: 'but I’ve had a dream. And I’ve now had the same dream three times. Once, on the night before the Battle of Bull Run. Once, on the night before' another battle (naming another one that also didn’t go well for the North). His chin dropped to his chest again, and he sat lost in thought. 'Could I ask what this dream is about, sir?' the Attorney-General asked. 'Well,' the President replied, without lifting his head or changing his posture, 'I’m on a great broad rolling river—and I’m in a boat—and I drift—and I drift!—But this isn’t business—' he suddenly raised his face and looked around the table as Mr. Stanton entered, 'let’s get to business, gentlemen.' As Mr. Stanton and the Attorney-General walked out together, they said it would be interesting to see if anything happened as a result of this; and they agreed to pay attention. He was shot that night."
On his birthday, the seventh of February, Dickens had his interview with President Andrew Johnson. "This scrambling scribblement is resumed this morning, because I have just seen the President: who had sent to me very courteously asking me to make my own appointment. He is a man with a remarkable face, indicating courage, watchfulness, and certainly strength of purpose. It is a face of the Webster type, but without the 'bounce' of Webster's face. I would have picked him out anywhere as a character of mark. Figure, rather stoutish for an American; a trifle under the middle size; hands clasped in front of him; manner, suppressed, guarded, anxious. Each of us looked[424] at the other very hard. . . . It was in his own cabinet that I saw him. As I came away, Thornton drove up in a sleigh—turned out for a state occasion—to deliver his credentials. There was to be a cabinet council at 12. The room was very like a London club's ante-drawing room. On the walls, two engravings only: one, of his own portrait; one, of Lincoln's. . . . In the outer room was sitting a certain sunburnt General Blair, with many evidences of the war upon him. He got up to shake hands with me, and then I found that he had been out on the Prairie with me five-and-twenty years ago. . . . The papers having referred to my birthday's falling to-day, my room is filled with most exquisite flowers.[276] They came pouring in from all sorts of people at breakfast time. The audiences here are really very fine. So ready to laugh or cry, and doing both so freely, that you would suppose them to be Manchester shillings rather than Washington half-sovereigns. Alas! alas! my cold worse than ever." So he had written too at the opening of his letter.
On his birthday, February 7th, Dickens had his meeting with President Andrew Johnson. "I’m picking up this writing again this morning because I just met with the President, who politely asked me to set my own appointment. He has a striking face that shows courage, alertness, and definitely determination. It's a face similar to Webster's, but without Webster's overconfidence. I would’ve recognized him anywhere as a noteworthy person. He’s somewhat stout for an American, a bit below average height, with his hands clasped in front of him; his manner is restrained, cautious, and anxious. We both looked at each other intently. . . . I saw him in his own office. As I was leaving, Thornton arrived in a sleigh, prepared for a formal occasion, to present his credentials. There was going to be a cabinet meeting at noon. The room resembled a London club's front lounge. There were only two engravings on the walls: one of his own portrait and one of Lincoln. . . . In the outer room, a sunburned General Blair was sitting, showing many signs of the war. He stood up to shake my hand, and then I realized he had been out on the Prairie with me twenty-five years ago. . . . Since the papers mentioned my birthday today, my room is filled with beautiful flowers. They started arriving from all kinds of people at breakfast time. The audiences here are really great. They laugh and cry so easily, so much that you'd think they were Manchester shillings rather than Washington half-sovereigns. Alas! alas! my cold is worse than ever." So he had written at the start of his letter.
The first reading had been four days earlier, and was[425] described to his daughter in a letter on the 4th, with a comical incident that occurred in the course of it. "The gas was very defective indeed last night, and I began with a small speech to the effect that I must trust to the brightness of their faces for the illumination of mine. This was taken greatly. In the Carol a most ridiculous incident occurred. All of a sudden, I saw a dog leap out from among the seats in the centre aisle, and look very intently at me. The general attention being fixed on me, I don't think anybody saw this dog; but I felt so sure of his turning up again and barking, that I kept my eye wandering about in search of him. He was a very comic dog, and it was well for me that I was reading a comic part of the book. But when he bounced out into the centre aisle again, in an entirely new place, and (still looking intently at me) tried the effect of a bark upon my proceedings, I was seized with such a paroxysm of laughter that it communicated itself to the audience, and we roared at one another, loud and long." Three days later the sequel came, in a letter to his sister-in-law. "I mentioned the dog on the first night here? Next night, I thought I heard (in Copperfield) a suddenly-suppressed bark. It happened in this wise:—One of our people, standing just within the door, felt his leg touched, and looking down beheld the dog, staring intently at me, and evidently just about to bark. In a transport of presence of mind and fury, he instantly caught him up in both hands, and threw him over his own head, out into the entry, where the check-takers received him like a game at ball. Last night he came again, with another dog; but our people were so sharply on the[426] look-out for him that he didn't get in. He had evidently promised to pass the other dog, free."
The first reading was four days earlier, and was[425] described to his daughter in a letter on the 4th, along with a funny incident that happened during it. "The gas was really bad last night, and I started with a small speech saying I had to rely on the brightness of their faces for my own illumination. This was well received. In the Carol, something quite ridiculous happened. Suddenly, I saw a dog jump out from among the seats in the center aisle and look directly at me. Since everyone was focused on me, I don't think anyone noticed the dog, but I was so sure it would pop up again and bark that I kept looking around for him. He was a really funny dog, and luckily, I was reading a funny part of the book. But when he bounced out into the center aisle again, in a completely different spot, and (still staring at me) tried to bark at me, I got such a fit of laughter that it spread to the audience, and we all roared with laughter together." Three days later, he wrote a follow-up in a letter to his sister-in-law. "Did I mention the dog the first night I was here? The next night, I thought I heard (in Copperfield) a suddenly-suppressed bark. Here’s what happened: One of our people, standing just inside the door, felt something touch his leg, and looking down saw the dog, staring at me and clearly about to bark. In a moment of quick thinking and frustration, he instantly scooped him up with both hands and tossed him over his head out into the entryway, where the ticket-takers caught him like a game of catch. Last night he returned, with another dog; but our people were so vigilant for him that he didn’t manage to get in. He had clearly agreed to let the other dog pass without a fuss."
What is expressed in these letters, of a still active, hopeful, enjoying, energetic spirit, able to assert itself against illness of the body and in some sort to overmaster it, was also so strongly impressed upon those who were with him, that, seeing his sufferings as they did, they yet found it difficult to understand the extent of them. The sadness thus ever underlying his triumph makes it all very tragical. "That afternoon of my birthday," he wrote from Baltimore on the 11th, "my catarrh was in such a state that Charles Sumner, coming in at five o'clock, and finding me covered with mustard poultice, and apparently voiceless, turned to Dolby and said: 'Surely, Mr. Dolby, it is impossible that he can read to-night!' Says Dolby: 'Sir, I have told Mr. Dickens so, four times to-day, and I have been very anxious. But you have no idea how he will change, when he gets to the little table.' After five minutes of the little table I was not (for the time) even hoarse. The frequent experience of this return of force when it is wanted, saves me a vast amount of anxiety; but I am not at times without the nervous dread that I may some day sink altogether." To the same effect in another letter he adds: "Dolby and Osgood" (the latter represented the publishing firm of Mr. Fields and was one of the travelling staff), "who do the most ridiculous things to keep me in spirits[277] (I am often very[427] heavy, and rarely sleep much), are determined to have a walking match at Boston on the last day of February to celebrate the arrival of the day when I can say 'next month!' for home." The match ended in the Englishman's defeat; which Dickens doubly commemorated, by a narrative of the American victory in sporting-newspaper style, and by a dinner in Boston to a party of dear friends there.
What comes through in these letters is a vibrant, hopeful, and energetic spirit that manages to stand up to physical illness and even rise above it somewhat. This was so strongly felt by those around him that even though they witnessed his suffering, they still had a hard time grasping how severe it was. The sadness that lingers beneath his triumph makes it all the more tragic. "That afternoon on my birthday," he wrote from Baltimore on the 11th, "my cold was so bad that when Charles Sumner came in at five o'clock and found me covered in a mustard pack and seemingly unable to speak, he turned to Dolby and said: ‘Surely, Mr. Dolby, it’s impossible for him to read tonight!’ Dolby replied, ‘Sir, I’ve told Mr. Dickens that four times today, and I’ve been quite worried. But you have no idea how he transforms when he gets to the little table.’ After just five minutes at the little table, I wasn’t even hoarse anymore (at least for that moment). The consistent experience of this surge in energy when I need it saves me a lot of worry; still, I sometimes can’t shake the nervous fear that I might eventually completely collapse." In another letter, he adds: "Dolby and Osgood" (the latter represented Mr. Fields' publishing firm and was part of the traveling crew), "who do the most ridiculous things to keep my spirits up (I often feel quite down and rarely sleep much), are determined to have a walking match in Boston on the last day of February to celebrate the arrival of the day when I can say ‘next month!’ for going home." The match ended in the Englishman's defeat, which Dickens marked with both a short story documenting the American victory in a sports newspaper style and by hosting a dinner in Boston for a group of close friends there.
After Baltimore he was reading again at Philadelphia, from which he wrote to his sister-in-law on the 13th as to a characteristic trait observed in both places. "Nothing will induce the people to believe in the farewells. At Baltimore on Tuesday night (a very brilliant night indeed), they asked as they came out: 'When will Mr. Dickens read here again?' 'Never.' 'Nonsense! Not come back, after such houses as these? Come. Say when he'll read again.' Just the same here. We could as soon persuade them that I am the President, as that to-morrow night I am going to read here for the last time. . . . There is a child in this house—a little girl—to whom I presented a black doll when I was here last; and as I have just seen her eye at the keyhole since I began writing this, I think she and the doll must be outside still. 'When you sent it up to me by the coloured boy,' she said after receiving it (coloured boy is the term for black waiter), 'I gave such a cream that Ma come running in and creamed too, 'cos she fort I'd hurt myself. But I creamed a cream of joy.' She had a friend to play with her that day, and brought the friend with her—to my infinite confusion. A friend all stockings and much too tall, who sat on the sofa very far back with her stockings[428] sticking stiffly out in front of her, and glared at me, and never spake a word. Dolby found us confronted in a sort of fascination, like serpent and bird."
After Baltimore, he was reading again in Philadelphia, where he wrote to his sister-in-law on the 13th about a common observation made in both places. "Nothing can make people believe in farewells. In Baltimore on Tuesday night (it was quite a brilliant night), they asked as they were leaving: 'When will Mr. Dickens read here again?' 'Never.' 'That's ridiculous! He won't come back after such crowds? Come on. Just say when he'll read again.' It's exactly the same here. We could persuade them about me being the President just as easily as convincing them that tomorrow night will be my last reading here. . . . There's a little girl in this house to whom I gave a black doll when I was here last; and since I just saw her peeking at the keyhole while I was writing this, I think she and the doll must still be outside. 'When you sent it up to me with the colored boy,' she said after getting it (colored boy is the term for black waiter), 'I squealed so loud that Mom came running in, worried I had hurt myself. But I squealed from joy.' She had a friend over to play that day and brought her along, which embarrassed me to no end. A friend all in stockings and much too tall, who sat on the sofa way back with her stiff stockings sticking out in front of her, glaring at me and not saying a word. Dolby found us entranced, like a snake and a bird."
On the 15th he was again at New York, in the thick of more troubles with the speculators. They involved even charges of fraud in ticket-sales at Newhaven and Providence; indignation meetings having been held by the Mayors, and unavailing attempts made by his manager to turn the wrath aside. "I expect him back here presently half bereft of his senses, and I should be wholly bereft of mine if the situation were not comical as well as disagreeable. We can sell at our own box-office to any extent; but we cannot buy back of the speculators, because we have informed the public that all the tickets are gone; and even if we made the sacrifice of buying at their price and selling at ours, we should be accused of treating with them and of making money by it." It ended in Providence by his going himself to the town and making a speech; and in Newhaven it ended by his sending back the money taken, with intimation that he would not read until there had been a new distribution of the tickets approved by all the town. Fresh disturbance broke out upon this; but he stuck to his determination to delay the reading until the heats had cooled down, and what should have been given in the middle of February he did not give until the close of March.
On the 15th, he was back in New York, dealing with more issues involving the speculators. This included even accusations of fraud in ticket sales in New Haven and Providence, sparking outrage meetings led by the Mayors, while his manager made unsuccessful attempts to defuse the situation. "I expect him back here soon, half out of his mind, and I would be completely out of mine if the situation weren't both funny and frustrating. We can sell as many tickets as we want at our box office, but we can't buy them back from the speculators because we've already told the public that all the tickets are sold out; even if we made the sacrifice to buy at their price and sell at ours, we’d be accused of colluding with them and profiting from it." It ended in Providence with him going to the town to make a speech, and in New Haven, he returned the collected money, saying he wouldn't perform until there was a new distribution of tickets approved by the entire town. New disruptions arose from this, but he remained committed to postponing the reading until tensions had calmed, and what should have happened in mid-February didn't take place until the end of March.
The Readings he had promised at the smaller outlying places by the Canadian frontier and Niagara district, including Syracuse, Rochester, and Buffalo, were appointed for that same March month which was to be the interval between the close of the ordinary readings[429] and the farewells in the two leading cities. All that had been promised in New York were closed when he returned to Boston on the 23rd of February, ready for the increase he had promised there; but the check of a sudden political excitement came. It was the month when the vote was taken for impeachment of President Johnson. "It is well" (25th of February) "that the money has flowed in hitherto so fast, for I have a misgiving that the great excitement about the President's impeachment will damage our receipts. . . . The vote was taken at 5 last night. At 7 the three large theatres here, all in a rush of good business, were stricken with paralysis. At 8 our long line of outsiders waiting for unoccupied places, was nowhere. To-day you hear all the people in the streets talking of only one thing. I shall suppress my next week's promised readings (by good fortune, not yet announced), and watch the course of events. Nothing in this country, as I before said, lasts long; and I think it likely that the public may be heartily tired of the President's name by the 9th of March, when I read at a considerable distance from here. So behold me with a whole week's holiday in view!" Two days later he wrote pleasantly to his sister-in-law of his audiences. "They have come to regard the Readings and the Reader as their peculiar property; and you would be both amused and pleased if you could see the curious way in which they show this increased interest in both. Whenever they laugh or cry, they have taken to applauding as well; and the result is very inspiriting. I shall remain here until Saturday the 7th; but after to-morrow night shall not read here until the 1st of April, when I begin my[430] farewells—six in number." On the 28th he wrote: "To-morrow fortnight we purpose being at the Falls of Niagara, and then we shall come back and really begin to wind up. I have got to know the Carol so well that I can't remember it, and occasionally go dodging about in the wildest manner, to pick up lost pieces. They took it so tremendously last night that I was stopped every five minutes. One poor young girl in mourning burst into a passion of grief about Tiny Tim, and was taken out. We had a fine house, and, in the interval while I was out, they covered the little table with flowers. The cough has taken a fresh start as if it were a novelty, and is even worse than ever to-day. There is a lull in the excitement about the President: but the articles of impeachment are to be produced this afternoon, and then it may set in again. Osgood came into camp last night from selling in remote places, and reports that at Rochester and Buffalo (both places near the frontier), tickets were bought by Canada people, who had struggled across the frozen river and clambered over all sorts of obstructions to get them. Some of those distant halls turn out to be smaller than represented; but I have no doubt—to use an American expression—that we shall 'get along.' The second half of the receipts cannot reasonably be expected to come up to the first; political circumstances, and all other surroundings, considered."
The readings he had promised in the smaller outlying areas near the Canadian border and Niagara region, including Syracuse, Rochester, and Buffalo, were scheduled for the same March month that would separate the end of the regular readings[429] and the farewells in the two major cities. Everything that was promised in New York was completed when he returned to Boston on February 23, ready for the increase he had assured there; however, a sudden political stir interrupted that. It was the month when the vote was taken for the impeachment of President Johnson. "It's a good thing" (February 25) "that the money has been coming in so quickly so far, because I have a feeling that all the excitement over the President's impeachment will hurt our earnings. . . . The vote was taken at 5 last night. By 7, the three big theaters here, which were doing great business, were suddenly empty. By 8, the long line of people waiting for available seats was gone. Today, all anyone talks about in the streets is one thing. I’m going to cancel my promised readings for next week (thankfully, they haven’t been announced yet) and see how things unfold. Nothing in this country lasts long, as I said before; and I think it’s likely that the public will be really tired of the President's name by March 9, when I perform at a significant distance from here. So here I am, with a whole week off ahead!" Two days later he wrote cheerfully to his sister-in-law about his audiences. "They have come to see the readings and me as their own property; you'd be both amused and pleased to see how they show this growing interest in both. Whenever they laugh or cry, they’ve started applauding as well; and the result is very uplifting. I’ll stay here until Saturday the 7th; but after tomorrow night, I won’t read here again until April 1, when I start my[430] farewells—six in total." On the 28th he wrote: "In two weeks, we plan to be at Niagara Falls, and then we’ll come back and really start wrapping things up. I’ve learned the Carol so well that I can hardly remember it, and I sometimes find myself dodging around in the most chaotic way to find lost parts. They enjoyed it so much last night that I was stopped every five minutes. One poor young girl in mourning burst into tears over Tiny Tim and had to be taken out. We had a great audience, and while I was out, they covered the little table with flowers. The cough has made a comeback like it’s brand new, and it's even worse than ever today. There’s a break in the excitement about the President, but the articles of impeachment are supposed to be revealed this afternoon, and then it might pick up again. Osgood came by last night after selling in remote places and said that in Rochester and Buffalo (both near the border), tickets were bought by people from Canada who struggled across the frozen river and climbed over all sorts of obstacles to get them. Some of those distant venues turned out to be smaller than advertised; but I have no doubt—using a classic American expression—that we’ll 'get along.' The second half of the earnings can’t be expected to match the first, considering political circumstances and everything else going on."
His old ill luck in travel pursued him. On the day his letter was written a snow-storm began, with a heavy gale of wind; and "after all the hard weather gone through," he wrote on the 2nd of March, "this is the[431] worst day we have seen. It is telegraphed that the storm prevails over an immense extent of country, and is just the same at Chicago as here. I hope it may prove a wind up. We are getting sick of the very sound of sleigh-bells even." The roads were so bad and the trains so much out of time, that he had to start a day earlier; and on the 6th of March his tour north-west began, with the gale still blowing and the snow falling heavily. On the 13th he wrote to me from Buffalo.
His bad luck with travel just wouldn’t let up. On the day he wrote the letter, a snowstorm hit, accompanied by a strong wind. He wrote on March 2nd, “After all the rough weather we've been through, this is the[431] worst day we've seen. It's been reported that the storm is affecting a huge area, and it’s just as bad in Chicago as it is here. I hope this will be the end of it. We're getting tired of the sound of sleigh bells, too.” The roads were in terrible shape and the trains were running way behind schedule, so he had to leave a day earlier. On March 6th, his journey northwest started, with the wind still howling and the snow coming down hard. On the 13th, he wrote to me from Buffalo.
"We go to the Falls of Niagara to-morrow for our own pleasure; and I take all the men, as a treat. We found Rochester last Tuesday in a very curious state. Perhaps you know that the Great Falls of the Genessee River (really very fine, even so near Niagara) are at that place. In the height of a sudden thaw, an immense bank of ice above the rapids refused to yield; so that the town was threatened (for the second time in four years) with submersion. Boats were ready in the streets, all the people were up all night, and none but the children slept. In the dead of the night a thundering noise was heard, the ice gave way, the swollen river came raging and roaring down the Falls, and the town was safe. Very picturesque! but 'not very good for business,' as the manager says. Especially as the hall stands in the centre of danger, and had ten feet of water in it on the last occasion of flood. But I think we had above £200 English. On the previous night at Syracuse—a most out of the way and unintelligible-looking place, with apparently no people in it—we had £375 odd. Here, we had last night, and shall have to-night, whatever we can cram into the hall.[432]
"We're going to Niagara Falls tomorrow for our enjoyment, and I'm treating all the guys. Last Tuesday, we found Rochester in a pretty interesting situation. Maybe you know that the Great Falls of the Genesee River (which are really impressive, even close to Niagara) are there. During a sudden thaw, a huge chunk of ice above the rapids wouldn't budge, putting the town at risk (for the second time in four years) of flooding. Boats were lined up in the streets, everyone was awake all night, and only the children got some sleep. In the dead of night, there was this loud crashing sound; the ice finally broke, and the raging river came roaring down the Falls, keeping the town safe. Very scenic! But 'not great for business,' as the manager puts it. Especially since the hall is right in the middle of the danger zone and had ten feet of water in it during the last flood. But I think we made over £200. The night before in Syracuse—a really random and confusing place that seems to have no people—we made about £375. Here, we made last night, and we'll make tonight, whatever we can fit into the hall.[432]
"This Buffalo has become a large and important town, with numbers of German and Irish in it. But it is very curious to notice, as we touch the frontier, that the American female beauty dies out; and a woman's face clumsily compounded of German, Irish, Western America, and Canadian, not yet fused together, and not yet moulded, obtains instead. Our show of Beauty at night is, generally, remarkable; but we had not a dozen pretty women in the whole throng last night, and the faces were all blunt. I have just been walking about, and observing the same thing in the streets. . . . The winter has been so severe, that the hotel on the English side at Niagara (which has the best view of the Falls, and is for that reason very preferable) is not yet open. So we go, perforce, to the American: which telegraphs back to our telegram: 'all Mr. Dickens's requirements perfectly understood.' I have not yet been in more than two very bad inns. I have been in some, where a good deal of what is popularly called 'slopping round' has prevailed; but have been able to get on very well. 'Slopping round,' so used, means untidyness and disorder. It is a comically expressive phrase, and has many meanings. Fields was asking the price of a quarter-cask of sherry the other day. 'Wa'al Mussr Fields,' the merchant replies, 'that varies according to quality, as is but nay'tral. If yer wa'ant a sherry just to slop round with it, I can fix you some at a very low figger.'"
"This Buffalo has grown into a large and significant town, with many Germans and Irish living here. But it's quite interesting to notice, as we reach the border, that American female beauty seems to fade; instead, we see a woman's face awkwardly made up of German, Irish, Western American, and Canadian features, not yet blended together and not yet shaped. Our display of beauty at night is usually impressive, but last night we didn't have more than a dozen attractive women in the entire crowd, and the faces were all plain. I’ve just been walking around and noticing the same thing in the streets. The winter has been so harsh that the hotel on the English side at Niagara (which has the best view of the Falls and is therefore much preferred) is still closed. So we have no choice but to go to the American side, which telegraphs back to our message: 'all Mr. Dickens's requirements perfectly understood.' I haven't stayed in more than two very bad inns. I've been in some where a lot of what people casually refer to as 'slopping around' has been happening, but I've managed just fine. 'Slopping around' means untidiness and disorder. It's a humorously expressive term with many meanings. Fields was asking about the price of a quarter-cask of sherry the other day. 'Well, Mr. Fields,' the merchant replies, 'that varies based on quality, as is only natural. If you want a sherry just to slop around with, I can get you some at a very low price.'"
His letter was resumed at Rochester on the 18th. "After two most brilliant days at the Falls of Niagara, we got back here last night. To-morrow morning we turn out at 6 for a long railway journey back to Albany.[433] But it is nearly all 'back' now, thank God! I don't know how long, though, before turning, we might have gone on at Buffalo. . . . We went everywhere at the Falls, and saw them in every aspect. There is a suspension bridge across, now, some two miles or more from the Horse Shoe; and another, half a mile nearer, is to be opened in July. They are very fine but very ticklish, hanging aloft there, in the continual vibration of the thundering water: nor is one greatly reassured by the printed notice that troops must not cross them at step, that bands of music must not play in crossing, and the like. I shall never forget the last aspect in which we saw Niagara yesterday. We had been everywhere, when I thought of struggling (in an open carriage) up some very difficult ground for a good distance, and getting where we could stand above the river, and see it, as it rushes forward to its tremendous leap, coming for miles and miles. All away to the horizon on our right was a wonderful confusion of bright green and white water. As we stood watching it with our faces to the top of the Falls, our backs were towards the sun. The majestic valley below the Falls, so seen through the vast cloud of spray, was made of rainbow. The high banks, the riven rocks, the forests, the bridge, the buildings, the air, the sky, were all made of rainbow. Nothing in Turner's finest water-colour drawings, done in his greatest day, is so ethereal, so imaginative, so gorgeous in colour, as what I then beheld. I seemed to be lifted from the earth and to be looking into Heaven. What I once said to you, as I witnessed the scene five and twenty years ago, all came back at this most affecting and sublime sight.[434] The 'muddy vesture of our clay' falls from us as we look. . . . I chartered a separate carriage for our men, so that they might see all in their own way, and at their own time.
His letter continued in Rochester on the 18th. "After two amazing days at the Falls of Niagara, we got back here last night. Tomorrow morning, we’re leaving at 6 for a long train ride back to Albany.[433] But it's almost all 'back' now, thank God! I’m not sure how long we could’ve gone on in Buffalo before needing to turn around. We explored all over the Falls and saw them from every viewpoint. There's now a suspension bridge across, about two miles or more from the Horseshoe; and another, half a mile closer, is set to open in July. They’re really impressive but a bit scary, swaying high up there with the constant roar of the rushing water: and it doesn’t help that there's a sign warning that troops shouldn’t cross in formation and that bands shouldn’t play while crossing, among other things. I’ll never forget the last view we had of Niagara yesterday. We had been everywhere, and then I thought about making our way (in an open carriage) up some really tough ground to get to a spot where we could stand above the river and see it rushing forward to its massive drop, coming from miles away. To our right, all the way to the horizon, was a breathtaking mix of bright green and white water. As we stood there watching with our faces towards the top of the Falls, the sun was behind us. The grand valley below the Falls, seen through the huge cloud of spray, was made of rainbows. The high banks, the jagged rocks, the forests, the bridge, the buildings, the air, the sky—they were all made of rainbows. Nothing in Turner’s finest watercolor paintings, made during his peak, is as ethereal, imaginative, or beautifully colored as what I witnessed then. I felt like I was lifted from the earth and looking into Heaven. Everything I once told you while experiencing this scene twenty-five years ago came rushing back at this incredibly moving and sublime sight.[434] The 'muddy vesture of our clay' falls away from us as we gaze. . . . I hired a separate carriage for our men so they could see everything in their own way and at their own pace."
"There is a great deal of water out between Rochester and New York, and travelling is very uncertain, as I fear we may find to-morrow. There is again some little alarm here on account of the river rising too fast. But our to-night's house is far ahead of the first. Most charming halls in these places; excellent for sight and sound. Almost invariably built as theatres, with stage, scenery, and good dressing-rooms. Audience seated to perfection (every seat always separate), excellent doorways and passages, and brilliant light. My screen and gas are set up in front of the drop-curtain, and the most delicate touches will tell anywhere. No creature but my own men ever near me."
"There’s a lot of water between Rochester and New York, and traveling is really unpredictable, as I’m afraid we might find out tomorrow. There’s some worry again because the river is rising too quickly. But our place to stay tonight is way better than the first one. The halls in these places are beautiful; great for both sight and sound. They’re almost always designed like theaters, with a stage, scenery, and nice dressing rooms. The audience is perfectly seated (every seat is separate), with great doorways and hallways, and bright lighting. I’ve set up my screen and gas in front of the drop curtain, and the most subtle details will show up anywhere. Only my own crew will be near me."
His anticipation of the uncertainty that might beset his travel back had dismal fulfilment. It is described in a letter written on the 21st from Springfield to his valued friend, Mr. Frederic Ouvry, having much interest of its own, and making lively addition to the picture which these chapters give. The unflagging spirit that bears up under all disadvantages is again marvellously shown. "You can hardly imagine what my life is with its present conditions—how hard the work is, and how little time I seem to have at my disposal. It is necessary to the daily recovery of my voice that I should dine at 3 when not travelling; I begin to prepare for the evening at 6; and I get back to my hotel, pretty well knocked up, at half-past 10. Add to all this, perpetual railway travelling in one of the severest winters[435] ever known; and you will descry a reason or two for my being an indifferent correspondent. Last Sunday evening I left the Falls of Niagara for this and two intervening places. As there was a great thaw, and the melted snow was swelling all the rivers, the whole country for three hundred miles was flooded. On the Tuesday afternoon (I had read on the Monday) the train gave in, as under circumstances utterly hopeless, and stopped at a place called Utica; the greater part of which was under water, while the high and dry part could produce nothing particular to eat. Here, some of the wretched passengers passed the night in the train, while others stormed the hotel. I was fortunate enough to get a bed-room, and garnished it with an enormous jug of gin-punch; over which I and the manager played a double-dummy rubber. At six in the morning we were knocked up: 'to come aboard and try it.' At half-past six we were knocked up again with the tidings 'that it was of no use coming aboard or trying it.' At eight all the bells in the town were set agoing, to summon us to 'come aboard' instantly. And so we started, through the water, at four or five miles an hour; seeing nothing but drowned farms, barns adrift like Noah's arks, deserted villages, broken bridges, and all manner of ruin. I was to read at Albany that night, and all the tickets were sold. A very active superintendent of works assured me that if I could be 'got along' he was the man to get me along: and that if I couldn't be got along, I might conclude that it couldn't possibly be fixed. He then turned on a hundred men in seven-league boots, who went ahead of the train, each armed with a long pole and pushing the blocks of ice away.[436] Following this cavalcade, we got to land at last, and arrived in time for me to read the Carol and Trial triumphantly. My people (I had five of the staff with me) turned to at their work with a will, and did a day's labour in a couple of hours. If we had not come in as we did, I should have lost £350, and Albany would have gone distracted. You may conceive what the flood was, when I hint at the two most notable incidents of our journey:—1, We took the passengers out of two trains, who had been in the water, immovable all night and all the previous day. 2, We released a large quantity of sheep and cattle from trucks that had been in the water I don't know how long, but so long that the creatures in them had begun to eat each other, and presented a most horrible spectacle."[278]
His anxiety about the uncertain circumstances affecting his return trip turned out to be quite gloomy. This is detailed in a letter written on the 21st from Springfield to his good friend, Mr. Frederic Ouvry, which is interesting in its own right and adds a vivid element to the narrative in these chapters. The relentless spirit that perseveres through all challenges is remarkably evident once more. "You can hardly imagine what my life is like under current conditions—how tough the work is, and how little time I seem to have to myself. To help my voice recover daily, I need to have dinner at 3 PM when I’m not traveling; I start preparing for the evening at 6 PM; and I return to my hotel, pretty worn out, at 10:30 PM. On top of all this, there’s constant train travel during one of the harshest winters ever known; and you’ll see a reason or two for my poor correspondence. Last Sunday evening, I left Niagara Falls for this location and two others in between. Because there was a major thaw, and the melted snow was raising the rivers, three hundred miles of the countryside were flooded. On Tuesday afternoon (I had read on Monday) the train broke down in what felt like a completely hopeless situation and stopped in a place called Utica; most of which was underwater, while the dry areas had very little to eat. Some unfortunate passengers spent the night in the train, while others stormed the hotel. I was lucky enough to get a bedroom, which I decorated with a huge jug of gin-punch; the manager and I played a round of cards over it. At six in the morning, we were roused: 'to come aboard and try it.' At 6:30 AM we were disturbed again with news that 'it was useless to come aboard or try it.' By eight, all the bells in town were ringing, urging us to 'come aboard' immediately. So we started off, wading through the water at four or five miles an hour; seeing nothing but submerged farms, barns drifting like Noah's arks, abandoned villages, broken bridges, and all kinds of destruction. I was supposed to read in Albany that night, and all the tickets were sold out. A very energetic work supervisor assured me that if he could get me 'along,' he was the guy for the job: and that if he couldn’t, then it simply couldn't be done. He then unleashed a hundred workers in special boots, who went ahead of the train, each carrying a long pole to push the blocks of ice aside. Following this group, we finally reached dry land and arrived just in time for me to read the Carol and Trial successfully. My team (I had five staff members with me) jumped into action and accomplished a full day's work in just a couple of hours. If we hadn’t arrived when we did, I would have lost £350, and Albany would have gone crazy. You can imagine how bad the flooding was based on the two most notable events of our journey: 1, We evacuated passengers from two trains who had been stranded in the water, unable to move, for an entire night and the day before. 2, We freed a large number of sheep and cattle from trucks that had been trapped in the water—I'm not sure for how long, but long enough that the animals had started to eat each other, creating a truly horrific sight."[278]
Beside Springfield, he had engagements at Portland, New Bedford, and other places in Massachusetts, before the Boston farewells began; and there wanted but two days to bring him to that time, when he thus described to his daughter the labour which was to occupy them. His letter was from Portland on the 29th of March, and it will be observed that he no longer compromises or glozes over what he was and had been suffering. During his terrible travel to Albany his cough had somewhat spared him, but the old illness had broken[437] out in his foot; and, though he persisted in ascribing it to the former supposed origin ("having been lately again wet, from walking in melted snow, which I suppose to be the occasion of its swelling in the old way"), it troubled him sorely, extended now at intervals to the right foot also, and lamed him for all the time he remained in the States. "I should have written to you by the last mail, but I really was too unwell to do it. The writing day was last Friday, when I ought to have left Boston for New Bedford (55 miles) before eleven in the morning. But I was so exhausted that I could not be got up, and had to take my chance of an evening train's producing me in time to read—which it just did. With the return of snow, nine days ago, my cough became as bad as ever. I have coughed every morning from two or three till five or six, and have been absolutely sleepless. I have had no appetite besides, and no taste.[279] Last night here, I took some laudanum; and it is the only thing that has done me good, though it made me sick this morning. But the life, in this climate, is so very hard! When I did manage to get to New Bedford, I read with my utmost force and vigour. Next morning, well or ill, I must[438] turn out at seven, to get back to Boston on my way here. I dined at Boston at three, and at five had to come on here (a hundred and thirty miles or so) for to-morrow night: there being no Sunday train. To-morrow night I read here in a very large place; and Tuesday morning at six I must again start, to get back to Boston once more. But after to-morrow night I have only the farewells, thank God! Even as it is, however, I have had to write to Dolby (who is in New York) to see my doctor there, and ask him to send me some composing medicine that I can take at night, inasmuch as without sleep I cannot get through. However sympathetic and devoted the people are about one, they can not be got to comprehend, seeing me able to do the two hours when the time comes round, that it may also involve much misery." To myself on the 30th he wrote from the same place, making like confession. No comment could deepen the sadness of the story of suffering, revealed in his own simple language. "I write in a town three parts of which were burnt down in a tremendous fire three years ago. The people lived in tents while their city was rebuilding. The charred trunks of the trees with which the streets of the old city were planted, yet stand here and there in the new thoroughfares like black spectres. The rebuilding is still in progress everywhere. Yet such is the astonishing energy of the people that the large hall in which I am to read to-night (its predecessor was burnt) would compare very favourably with the Free Trade Hall at Manchester! . . . I am nearly used up. Climate, distance, catarrh, travelling, and hard work, have begun (I may say so, now they are nearly all over) to tell[439] heavily upon me. Sleeplessness besets me; and if I had engaged to go on into May, I think I must have broken down. It was well that I cut off the Far West and Canada when I did. There would else have been a sad complication. It is impossible to make the people about one understand, however zealous and devoted (it is impossible even to make Dolby understand until the pinch comes), that the power of coming up to the mark every night, with spirits and spirit, may coexist with the nearest approach to sinking under it. When I got back to Boston on Thursday, after a very hard three weeks, I saw that Fields was very grave about my going on to New Bedford (55 miles) next day, and then coming on here (180 miles) next day. But the stress is over, and so I can afford to look back upon it, and think about it, and write about it." On the 31st he closed his letter at Boston, and he was at home when I heard of him again. "The latest intelligence, my dear old fellow, is, that I have arrived here safely, and that I am certainly better. I consider my work virtually over, now. My impression is, that the political crisis will damage the farewells by about one half. I cannot yet speak by the card; but my predictions here, as to our proceedings, have thus far been invariably right. We took last night at Portland, £360 English; where a costly Italian troupe, using the same hall to-night, had not booked £14! It is the same all over the country, and the worst is not seen yet. Everything is becoming absorbed in the Presidential impeachment, helped by the next Presidential election. Connecticut is particularly excited. The night after I read at Hartford this last week, there[440] were two political meetings in the town; meetings of two parties; and the hotel was full of speakers coming in from outlying places. So at Newhaven: the moment I had finished, carpenters came in to prepare for next night's politics. So at Buffalo. So everywhere very soon."
Beside Springfield, he had engagements in Portland, New Bedford, and other locations in Massachusetts before the Boston farewells began; there were just two days left until that time when he described to his daughter the work that would occupy them. His letter dated March 29th came from Portland, and it's clear that he no longer downplays or sugarcoats what he was going through. During his grueling travel to Albany, his cough had mostly relented, but the old illness flared up in his foot; even though he insisted it was due to the previous cause ("having recently been wet from walking in melted snow, which I think caused it to swell up again"), it troubled him greatly, now affecting his right foot as well, and rendered him lame for his entire stay in the States. "I should have written to you by the last mail, but I honestly was too unwell to do it. The writing day was last Friday when I was supposed to leave Boston for New Bedford (55 miles) before eleven in the morning. But I was so worn out that I couldn't get up, and had to hope that an evening train would get me there in time to read—which it just barely did. With the return of snow nine days ago, my cough became as bad as ever. I've been coughing every morning from two or three until five or six, and I’ve had absolutely no sleep. I also have no appetite or sense of taste. Last night here, I took some laudanum; it was the only thing that helped, although it made me feel sick this morning. But life here in this climate is really tough! When I finally managed to get to New Bedford, I read with all my strength and energy. The next morning, whether feeling well or not, I have to get up at seven to head back to Boston on my way here. I had lunch in Boston at three, and at five, I had to come back here (about a hundred and thirty miles) for tomorrow night, since there’s no Sunday train. Tomorrow night, I read here in a very large venue; and Tuesday morning at six, I need to start again to get back to Boston once more. But after tomorrow night, I only have the farewells left, thank God! Even so, I’ve had to write to Dolby (who’s in New York) to ask my doctor there for some sedative medicine I can take at night, since without sleep, I can't get through. No matter how sympathetic and dedicated the people around you are, they can’t understand that being able to perform for two hours when the time comes doesn’t mean that it doesn’t involve a lot of suffering." On the 30th, he wrote a similar confession to myself from the same place. No comment can capture the sadness of the suffering revealed in his own simple words. "I’m writing from a town where three-quarters was burned down in a huge fire three years ago. People lived in tents while their city was being rebuilt. The charred stumps of the trees that lined the streets of the old city still stand here and there in the new roads like black ghosts. The rebuilding is still ongoing everywhere. Yet, the remarkable energy of the people is such that the large hall where I’m reading tonight (its predecessor was burned down) would compare very well with the Free Trade Hall in Manchester! I’m nearly worn out. The climate, distance, congestion, traveling, and hard work have started (I can say this now that it’s almost over) to take a heavy toll on me. I'm struggling with sleeplessness, and if I had committed to go on into May, I think I would have collapsed. It was a good choice to cut off the Far West and Canada when I did. Otherwise, it would have been a sad complication. It’s impossible to make those around you understand, no matter how eager and devoted they are (it’s impossible even to make Dolby understand until it becomes unbearable), that the ability to rise to the occasion every night, with enthusiasm and spirit, can coexist with being on the brink of collapse. When I got back to Boston on Thursday after a very tough three weeks, I noticed that Fields was quite serious about my heading to New Bedford (55 miles) the next day and then coming here (180 miles) the following day. But the pressure is off now, so I can afford to reflect on it, think about it, and write about it." On the 31st, he finished his letter in Boston, and I heard from him again when he was home. "The latest update, my dear friend, is that I’ve arrived safely, and I’m definitely feeling better. I consider my work almost done now. I have a feeling the political situation will reduce the farewells by about half. I can't say for sure yet, but my predictions about our plans have been spot on so far. Last night in Portland, we made £360 English; where a pricey Italian troupe using the same hall tonight had only booked £14! This is the trend all over the country, and the worst is yet to come. Everything is getting overshadowed by the Presidential impeachment, coupled with the upcoming Presidential election. Connecticut is particularly charged. The night after I read in Hartford last week, there were two political meetings in town; meetings from two different parties; the hotel was packed with speakers coming in from the surrounding areas. The same happened in New Haven: as soon as I finished, carpenters came in to prepare for the next night’s political events. It’s the same story in Buffalo and soon everywhere."
In the same tone he wrote his last letter to his sister-in-law from Boston. "My notion of the farewells is pretty certain now to turn out right. We had £300 English here last night. To-day is a Fast Day, and to-night we shall probably take much less. Then it is likely that we shall pull up again, and strike a good reasonable average; but it is not at all probable that we shall do anything enormous. Every pulpit in Massachusetts will resound with violent politics to-day and to-night." That was on the second of April, and a postscript was added. "Friday afternoon the 3rd. Catarrh worse than ever! and we don't know (at four o'clock) whether I can read to-night or must stop. Otherwise, all well."
In the same tone, he wrote his last letter to his sister-in-law from Boston. "I’m pretty sure my take on the farewells is going to end up being accurate. We had £300 English here last night. Today is a Fast Day, and tonight we’ll probably take in much less. Then it’s likely we’ll gather again and find a reasonable average; but it’s not at all likely we’ll accomplish anything huge. Every pulpit in Massachusetts will be loud with heated political talk today and tonight." That was on April 2nd, and a postscript was added. "Friday afternoon, the 3rd. My cold is worse than ever! and we don’t know (at four o’clock) if I can read tonight or if I’ll have to stop. Otherwise, all is well."
Dickens's last letter from America was written to his daughter Mary from Boston on the 9th of April, the day before his sixth and last farewell night. "I not only read last Friday when I was doubtful of being able to do so, but read as I never did before, and astonished the audience quite as much as myself. You never saw or heard such a scene of excitement. Longfellow and all the Cambridge men have urged me to give in. I have been very near doing so, but feel stronger to-day. I cannot tell whether the catarrh may have done me any lasting injury in the lungs or other breathing organs, until I shall have rested and got home. I[441] hope and believe not. Consider the weather! There have been two snow storms since I wrote last, and to-day the town is blotted out in a ceaseless whirl of snow and wind. Dolby is as tender as a woman, and as watchful as a doctor. He never leaves me during the reading, now, but sits at the side of the platform, and keeps his eye upon me all the time. Ditto George the gasman, steadiest and most reliable man I ever employed. I have Dombey to do to-night, and must go through it carefully; so here ends my report. The personal affection of the people in this place is charming to the last. Did I tell you that the New York Press are going to give me a public dinner on Saturday the 18th?"
Dickens's last letter from America was written to his daughter Mary from Boston on April 9th, the day before his sixth and final farewell night. "I not only read last Friday when I was unsure if I could, but I read like never before, astonishing both the audience and myself. You’ve never seen or heard such a scene of excitement. Longfellow and all the Cambridge folks have urged me to give in. I’ve come close to doing it, but I feel stronger today. I can’t tell yet if the cold might have caused any lasting damage to my lungs or other breathing parts until I’ve rested and gotten home. I hope and believe not. Consider the weather! There have been two snowstorms since I last wrote, and today the town is completely obscured in a nonstop swirl of snow and wind. Dolby is as caring as a woman and as watchful as a doctor. He doesn’t leave my side during the reading now; he sits at the side of the stage, keeping an eye on me at all times. Same goes for George the gasman, the steadiest and most reliable person I’ve ever employed. I have Dombey to read tonight, and I need to go through it carefully; so that’s my update. The personal affection of the people here is wonderful until the very end. Did I mention that the New York Press is planning to throw me a public dinner on Saturday the 18th?"
In New York, where there were five farewell nights, three thousand two hundred and ninety-eight dollars were the receipts of the last, on the 20th of April; those of the last at Boston, on the 8th, having been three thousand four hundred and fifty-six dollars. But on earlier nights in the same cities respectively, these sums also had been reached; and indeed, making allowance for an exceptional night here and there, the receipts varied so wonderfully little, that a mention of the highest average returns from other places will give no exaggerated impression of the ordinary receipts throughout. Excluding fractions of dollars, the lowest were New Bedford ($1640), Rochester ($1906), Springfield ($1970), and Providence ($2140). Albany and Worcester averaged something less than $2400; while Hartford, Buffalo, Baltimore, Syracuse, Newhaven, and Portland rose to $2600. Washington's last night was $2610, no night there having less than $2500. Philadelphia[442] exceeded Washington by $300, and Brooklyn went ahead of Philadelphia by $200. The amount taken at the four Brooklyn readings was 11,128 dollars.
In New York, where there were five farewell nights, the total earnings of the last night, on April 20th, were $3,298; the final night in Boston, on the 8th, brought in $3,456. However, on earlier nights in both cities, similar amounts had been achieved; indeed, with a few exceptional evenings here and there, the earnings varied so little that mentioning the highest average returns from other locations won’t give an exaggerated idea of typical earnings overall. Excluding cents, the lowest amounts were New Bedford ($1,640), Rochester ($1,906), Springfield ($1,970), and Providence ($2,140). Albany and Worcester averaged just below $2,400, while Hartford, Buffalo, Baltimore, Syracuse, New Haven, and Portland reached $2,600. Washington’s last night was $2,610, with no night there bringing in less than $2,500. Philadelphia exceeded Washington by $300, and Brooklyn surpassed Philadelphia by $200. The total amount from the four readings in Brooklyn was $11,128.
The New York public dinner was given at Delmonico's, the hosts were more than two hundred, and the chair was taken by Mr. Horace Greeley. Dickens attended with great difficulty,[280] and spoke in pain. But he used the occasion to bear his testimony to the changes of twenty-five years; the rise of vast new cities; growth in the graces and amenities of life; much improvement in the press, essential to every other advance; and changes in himself leading to opinions more deliberately formed. He promised his kindly entertainers that no copy of his Notes, or his Chuzzlewit, should in future be issued by him without accompanying mention of the changes to which he had referred that night; of the politeness, delicacy, sweet temper, hospitality, and consideration in all ways for which he had to thank them; and of his gratitude for the respect shown, during all his visit, to the privacy enforced upon him by the nature of his work and the condition of his health.
The New York public dinner was held at Delmonico's, with more than two hundred guests, and Mr. Horace Greeley presided over the event. Dickens attended with great difficulty,[280] and spoke in pain. However, he took the opportunity to express his thoughts on the changes of the past twenty-five years; the emergence of large new cities; the improvement in the comforts and conveniences of life; significant progress in the press, which is crucial for any further advancements; and the personal changes he experienced, leading to more carefully considered opinions. He assured his kind hosts that no future editions of his Notes or Chuzzlewit would be published without mentioning the changes he referenced that night, including the politeness, kindness, sweet temperament, hospitality, and thoughtfulness he had to thank them for; and his appreciation for the respect shown to his need for privacy due to his work and health condition during his entire visit.
He had to leave the room before the proceedings[443] were over. On the following Monday he read to his last American audience, telling them at the close that he hoped often to recall them, equally by his winter fire and in the green summer weather, and never as a mere public audience but as a host of personal friends. He sailed two days later in the "Russia," and reached England in the first week of May 1868.
He had to leave the room before the event[443] was over. The following Monday, he spoke to his last American audience, telling them at the end that he hoped to think of them often, both by his winter fire and in the warm summer weather, and never just as a public audience but as a group of personal friends. He sailed two days later on the "Russia" and arrived in England in the first week of May 1868.
CHAPTER XVII.
LAST READINGS.
1868-1870.
Favourable weather helped him pleasantly home. He had profited greatly by the sea voyage, perhaps greatly more by its repose; and on the 25th of May he described himself to his Boston friends as brown beyond belief, and causing the greatest disappointment in all quarters by looking so well. "My doctor was quite broken down in spirits on seeing me for the first time last Saturday. Good Lord! seven years younger! said the doctor, recoiling." That he gave all the credit to "those fine days at sea," and none to the rest from such labours as he had passed through, the close of the letter too sadly showed. "We are already settling—think of this!—the details of my farewell course of readings."
Positive weather made his journey home enjoyable. He had gained a lot from the sea voyage, perhaps even more from the chance to relax; and on May 25th, he told his friends in Boston that he was tanned beyond belief and causing great disappointment everywhere by looking so good. "My doctor was pretty down when he saw me for the first time last Saturday. Good Lord! seven years younger! said the doctor, stepping back." He credited all of his improvement to "those great days at sea," rather than to the rest he had gotten after all those labors, as the end of the letter sadly indicated. "We are already planning—can you believe this?—the details of my farewell series of readings."
Even on his way out to America that enterprise was in hand. From Halifax he had written to me. "I[445] told the Chappells that when I got back to England, I would have a series of farewell readings in town and country; and then read No More. They at once offer in writing to pay all expenses whatever, to pay the ten per cent. for management, and to pay me, for a series of 75, six thousand pounds." The terms were raised and settled before the first Boston readings closed. The number was to be a hundred; and the payment, over and above expenses and per centage, eight thousand pounds. Such a temptation undoubtedly was great; and though it was a fatal mistake which Dickens committed in yielding to it, it was not an ignoble one. He did it under no excitement from the American gains, of which he knew nothing when he pledged himself to the enterprise. No man could care essentially less for mere money than he did. But the necessary provision for many sons was a constant anxiety; he was proud of what the Readings had done to abridge this care; and the very strain of them under which it seems certain that his health had first given way, and which he always steadily refused to connect especially with them, had also broken the old confidence of being at all times available for his higher pursuit. What affected his health only he would not regard as part of the question either way. That was to be borne as the lot more or less of all men; and the more thorough he could make his feeling of independence, and of ability to rest, by what was now in hand, the better his final chances of a perfect recovery would be. That was the spirit in which he entered on this last engagement. It was an opportunity offered for making a particular work really complete before he should abandon it for[446] ever. Something of it will not be indiscernible even in the summary of his past acquisitions, which with a pardonable exultation he now sent me.
Even on his way to America, he was already planning this project. From Halifax, he wrote to me: "I told the Chappells that when I got back to England, I would have a series of farewell readings in towns and countries; then I would read No More. They immediately offered in writing to cover all expenses, pay the ten percent for management, and pay me six thousand pounds for a series of 75." The terms were negotiated and finalized before the first Boston readings ended. The number was set at a hundred, with payments, beyond expenses and percentage, totaling eight thousand pounds. This was undoubtedly a strong temptation, and while it was a serious mistake for Dickens to give in to it, it wasn't a dishonorable one. He wasn't swayed by any excitement about American profits, which he was unaware of when he committed to the project. No one cared less about money than he did. However, the need to provide for many children was a constant worry; he felt proud of how the readings helped alleviate this concern. The pressure from them seemed to have contributed to the decline in his health, although he consistently refused to link his health issues especially to them, which had also shattered his previous confidence in being available for his loftier ambitions. He didn't consider what affected his health as part of the overall issue. That was something everyone had to endure, to varying degrees; and the more he could reinforce his sense of independence and ability to relax through what he was currently handling, the better his chances of a full recovery would be. This was the mindset with which he approached this last commitment. It was a chance to complete a particular piece of work before leaving it behind for good. Some of this will be evident even in the summary of his past achievements, which he now sent me with a touch of deserved pride.
"We had great difficulty in getting our American accounts squared to the point of ascertaining what Dolby's commission amounted to in English money. After all, we were obliged to call in the aid of a money-changer, to determine what he should pay as his share of the average loss of conversion into gold. With this deduction made, I think his commission (I have not the figures at hand) was £2,888; Ticknor and Fields had a commission of £1,000, besides 5 per cent. on all Boston receipts. The expenses in America to the day of our sailing were 38,948 dollars;—roughly 39,000 dollars, or £13,000. The preliminary expenses were £614. The average price of gold was nearly 40 per cent., and yet my profit was within a hundred or so of £20,000. Supposing me to have got through the present engagement in good health, I shall have made by the Readings, in two years, £33,000: that is to say, £13,000 received from the Chappells, and £20,000 from America. What I had made by them before, I could only ascertain by a long examination of Coutts's books. I should say, certainly not less than £10,000: for I remember that I made half that money in the first town and country campaign with poor Arthur Smith. These figures are of course between ourselves; but don't you think them rather remarkable? The Chappell bargain began with £50 a night and everything paid; then became £60; and now rises to £80."
"We had a tough time figuring out our American accounts to determine how much Dolby's commission was in English money. We even had to bring in a money-changer to find out what he should pay his share of the average loss from converting into gold. After making this deduction, I believe his commission (I don't have the exact numbers right now) was £2,888; Ticknor and Fields received a commission of £1,000, plus 5 percent on all Boston earnings. The expenses in America up to the day of our departure totaled 38,948 dollars—roughly 39,000 dollars, or £13,000. The preliminary expenses were £614. The average price of gold was nearly 40 percent, yet my profit was just under £20,000. If I manage to get through this current engagement in good health, I’ll have made £33,000 from the Readings in two years: £13,000 from the Chappells and £20,000 from America. The amount I made from them previously, I could only figure out through a lengthy review of Coutts's records. I would estimate it was certainly not less than £10,000; I remember making half that during the first town and country tour with poor Arthur Smith. These numbers are of course just between us; but don’t you find them pretty remarkable? The Chappell deal started at £50 a night with everything covered; then it went up to £60; and now it's reaching £80."
The last readings were appointed to begin with October; and at the request of an old friend, Chauncy[447] Hare Townshend, who died during his absence in the States, he had accepted the trust, which occupied him some part of the summer, of examining and selecting for publication a bequest of some papers on matters of religious belief, which were issued in a small volume the following year. There came also in June a visit from Longfellow and his daughters, with later summer visits from the Eliot Nortons; and at the arrival of friends whom he loved and honoured as he did these, from the great country to which he owed so much, infinite were the rejoicings of Gadshill. Nothing could quench his old spirit in this way. But in the intervals of my official work I saw him frequently that summer, and never without the impression that America had told heavily upon him. There was manifest abatement of his natural force, the elasticity of bearing was impaired, and the wonderful brightness of eye was dimmed at times. One day, too, as he walked from his office with Miss Hogarth to dine at our house, he could read only the halves of the letters over the shop doors that were on his right as he looked. He attributed it to medicine. It was an additional unfavourable symptom that his right foot had become affected as well as the left, though not to anything like the same extent, during the journey from the Canada frontier to Boston. But all this disappeared, upon any special cause for exertion; and he was never unprepared to lavish freely for others the reserved strength that should have been kept for himself. This indeed was the great danger, for it dulled the apprehension of us all to the fact that absolute and pressing danger did positively exist.
The last readings were scheduled to start in October; and at the request of an old friend, Chauncy[447] Hare Townshend, who passed away while he was in the States, he took on the responsibility, which occupied him for part of the summer, of reviewing and choosing papers on topics of religious belief for publication. These were released in a small volume the following year. In June, he had a visit from Longfellow and his daughters, followed by later summer visits from the Eliot Nortons; and when friends he cared for and respected came from the great country to which he owed so much, it brought endless joy to Gadshill. Nothing could dampen his old spirit in this regard. However, during the times I was not busy with my official work, I saw him often that summer, always with the feeling that America had taken a toll on him. There was a noticeable decrease in his natural energy, his buoyancy was diminished, and sometimes the incredible brightness of his eyes seemed dulled. One day, as he walked from his office with Miss Hogarth to dine at our house, he could only read the halves of the letters on the shop signs to his right. He blamed it on medication. It was another concerning sign that his right foot had also become affected, though not nearly to the same extent as the left, during the journey from the Canada border to Boston. But all of this vanished with any special need for effort; and he was always ready to generously give the strength he should have saved for himself to others. This was indeed a significant danger, as it obscured our awareness of the real and urgent threat that was present.
He had scarcely begun these last readings than he[448] was beset by a misgiving, that, for a success large enough to repay Messrs. Chappell's liberality, the enterprise would require a new excitement to carry him over the old ground; and it was while engaged in Manchester and Liverpool at the outset of October that this announcement came. "I have made a short reading of the murder in Oliver Twist. I cannot make up my mind, however, whether to do it or not. I have no doubt that I could perfectly petrify an audience by carrying out the notion I have of the way of rendering it. But whether the impression would not be so horrible as to keep them away another time, is what I cannot satisfy myself upon. What do you think? It is in three short parts: 1, Where Fagin sets Noah Claypole on to watch Nancy. 2, The scene on London Bridge. 3, Where Fagin rouses Claypole from his sleep, to tell his perverted story to Sikes. And the Murder, and the Murderer's sense of being haunted. I have adapted and cut about the text with great care, and it is very powerful. I have to-day referred the book and the question to the Chappells as so largely interested." I had a strong dislike to this proposal, less perhaps on the ground which ought to have been taken of the physical exertion it would involve, than because such a subject seemed to be altogether out of the province of reading; and it was resolved, that, before doing it, trial should be made to a limited private audience in St. James's Hall. The note announcing this, from Liverpool on the 25th of October, is for other reasons worth printing. "I give you earliest notice that the Chappells suggest to me the 18th of November" (the 14th was chosen) "for trial of the Oliver Twist murder,[449] when everything in use for the previous day's reading can be made available. I hope this may suit you? We have been doing well here; and how it was arranged, nobody knows, but we had £410 at St. James's Hall last Tuesday, having advanced from our previous £360. The expenses are such, however, on the princely scale of the Chappells, that we never begin at a smaller, often at a larger, cost than £180. . . . I have not been well, and have been heavily tired. However, I have little to complain of—nothing, nothing; though, like Mariana, I am aweary. But think of this. If all go well, and (like Mr. Dennis) I 'work off' this series triumphantly, I shall have made of these readings £28,000 in a year and a half." This did not better reconcile me to what had been too clearly forced upon him by the supposed necessity of some new excitement to ensure a triumphant result; and even the private rehearsal only led to a painful correspondence between us, of which a few words are all that need now be preserved. "We might have agreed," he wrote, "to differ about it very well, because we only wanted to find out the truth if we could, and because it was quite understood that I wanted to leave behind me the recollection of something very passionate and dramatic, done with simple means, if the art would justify the theme." Apart from mere personal considerations, the whole question lay in these last words. It was impossible for me to admit that the effect to be produced was legitimate, or such as it was desirable to associate with the recollection of his readings.
He had barely started these final readings when he[448] was struck by a feeling of doubt that, for a success big enough to justify Messrs. Chappell's generosity, the project would need a fresh spark to take him through familiar territory; and it was while he was busy in Manchester and Liverpool at the beginning of October that this announcement arrived. "I have done a brief reading of the murder in Oliver Twist. I'm still unsure whether to go ahead with it or not. I’m confident I could completely captivate an audience with the way I envision presenting it. But I worry whether the impact would be so disturbing that it would drive them away next time, which I can't settle in my mind. What do you think? It’s in three short parts: 1, Where Fagin has Noah Claypole keep an eye on Nancy. 2, The scene on London Bridge. 3, Where Fagin wakes Claypole from his sleep to share his twisted story with Sikes. And the Murder, and the Murderer’s feeling of being haunted. I've carefully adapted and edited the text, and it’s very powerful. Today, I’ve brought the book and the question to the Chappells since they are so heavily involved." I had a strong aversion to this idea, not so much because of the physical effort it would require, but because the topic seemed completely outside the realm of reading; and it was decided that, before proceeding, we should conduct a trial with a limited private audience in St. James's Hall. The note announcing this, from Liverpool on October 25th, is worth sharing for other reasons. "I’m giving you the earliest notice that the Chappells suggest November 18th" (the 14th was eventually chosen) "for the trial of the Oliver Twist murder,[449] when everything needed from the previous day’s reading can be arranged. I hope that works for you? We’ve been doing well here; and how it happened, nobody knows, but we raised £410 at St. James's Hall last Tuesday, up from our previous £360. The expenses are quite high, however, with the lavish style of the Chappells, so we rarely start with anything less—and often more—than £180. . . . I haven’t been feeling well and have been really exhausted. Still, I have little to complain about—nothing, nothing; although, like Mariana, I'm weary. But consider this. If all goes well, and (like Mr. Dennis) I 'work off' this series successfully, I’ll have earned £28,000 from these readings in a year and a half." This did not ease my discomfort with what had clearly been imposed on him by the supposed need for some new excitement to guarantee a successful outcome; and even the private rehearsal only led to painful correspondence between us, of which only a few words need to be kept. "We could have easily agreed," he wrote, "to have different opinions on this because we just wanted to uncover the truth if we could, and it was clearly understood that I wanted to leave behind me the memory of something very passionate and dramatic, accomplished with simple means, if the artistry could justify the subject." Apart from mere personal concerns, the whole issue lay in those last words. It was impossible for me to accept that the intended effect was legitimate or one that should be linked to the memory of his readings.
Mention should not be omitted of two sorrows which affected him at this time. At the close of the month[450] before the readings began his youngest son went forth from home to join an elder brother in Australia. "These partings are hard hard things" (26th of September), "but they are the lot of us all, and might have to be done without means or influence, and then would be far harder. God bless him!" Hardly a month later, the last of his surviving brothers, Frederick, the next to himself, died at Darlington. "He had been tended" (24th of October) "with the greatest care and affection by some local friends. It was a wasted life, but God forbid that one should be hard upon it, or upon anything in this world that is not deliberately and coldly wrong."
Mention should not be left out about two sorrows that affected him during this time. At the end of the month[450] before the readings started, his youngest son left home to join an older brother in Australia. "These goodbyes are tough, tough things" (September 26), "but they are a part of life for all of us, and could happen without any resources or influence, making them much harder. God bless him!" Hardly a month later, the last of his surviving brothers, Frederick, who was next in line after him, died in Darlington. "He had been cared for" (October 24) "with the utmost care and affection by some local friends. It was a wasted life, but God forbid that we should judge it harshly, or anything else in this world that isn’t deliberately and coldly wrong."
Before October closed the renewal of his labour had begun to tell upon him. He wrote to his sister-in-law on the 29th of sickness and sleepless nights, and of its having become necessary, when he had to read, that he should lie on the sofa all day. After arrival at Edinburgh in December he had been making a calculation that the railway travelling over such a distance involved something more than thirty thousand shocks to the nerves; but he went on to Christmas, alternating these far-off places with nights regularly intervening in London, without much more complaint than of an inability to sleep. Trade reverses at Glasgow had checked the success there,[281] but Edinburgh made compensation.[451] "The affectionate regard of the people exceeds all bounds and is shown in every way. The audiences do everything but embrace me, and take as much pains with the readings as I do. . . . The keeper of the Edinburgh hall, a fine old soldier, presented me on Friday night with the most superb red camellia for my button-hole that ever was seen. Nobody can imagine how he came by it, as the florists had had a considerable demand for that colour, from ladies in the stalls, and could get no such thing."
Before October ended, the renewal of his work started to have an effect on him. He wrote to his sister-in-law on the 29th about his sickness and sleepless nights, mentioning that it had become necessary for him to lie on the sofa all day when he had to read. After arriving in Edinburgh in December, he calculated that traveling such a long distance by train involved over thirty thousand shocks to his nerves; however, he continued through Christmas, alternating between those distant places and regularly spending nights in London, with little more complaint than his difficulty sleeping. Business setbacks in Glasgow had limited his success there,[281] but Edinburgh made up for it.[451] "The warmth and affection of the people are overwhelming and expressed in every possible way. The audiences go out of their way to support me and engage with the readings just as much as I do. . . . The manager of the Edinburgh hall, a distinguished old soldier, gifted me on Friday night the most beautiful red camellia for my buttonhole that anyone has ever seen. No one knows how he managed to get it since the florists had a high demand for that color from the ladies in the audience and couldn't supply it."
The second portion of the enterprise opened with the New Year, and the Sikes and Nancy scenes, everywhere his prominent subject, exacted the most terrible physical exertion from him. In January he was at Clifton, where he had given, he told his sister-in-law, "by far the best Murder yet done;" while at the same date he wrote to his daughter: "At Clifton on Monday night we had a contagion of fainting; and yet the place was not hot. I should think we had from a dozen to twenty ladies taken out stiff and rigid, at various times! It became quite ridiculous." He was afterwards at Cheltenham. "Macready is of opinion that the Murder is two Macbeths. He declares that he heard every word of the reading, but I doubt it. Alas! he is sadly infirm." On the 27th he wrote to his daughter from Torquay that the place into which they had put him to read, and where a pantomime had been played the night before, was something between a Methodist chapel, a theatre, a circus, a riding-school, and a cow-house. That day he wrote to me from Bath: "Landor's ghost goes along the silent streets here before me. . . . The place looks to me like a cemetery[452] which the Dead have succeeded in rising and taking. Having built streets, of their old gravestones, they wander about scantly trying to 'look alive.' A dead failure."
The second part of the project kicked off with the New Year, and the Sikes and Nancy scenes, which were his main focus, demanded a lot of physical effort from him. In January, he was in Clifton, where he told his sister-in-law, "I've done the best Murder yet;" while at the same time, he wrote to his daughter: "On Monday night in Clifton, we had a wave of fainting; and it wasn't even hot. I think we had about a dozen to twenty ladies carried out stiff and rigid at different times! It got quite ridiculous." He later went to Cheltenham. "Macready thinks the Murder is like two Macbeths. He insists he heard every word during the reading, but I doubt that. Unfortunately, he's quite unwell." On the 27th, he wrote to his daughter from Torquay that the place they had set him up in for reading, where a pantomime had been performed the night before, was a mix between a Methodist chapel, a theater, a circus, a riding school, and a cow barn. That day, he wrote to me from Bath: "Landor's ghost walks along the quiet streets here ahead of me. . . . The place seems to me like a cemetery[452] where the Dead have managed to rise and take over. They’ve built streets out of their old gravestones and wander around, barely trying to 'look alive.' A complete failure."
In the second week of February he was in London, under engagement to return to Scotland (which he had just left) after the usual weekly reading at St. James's Hall, when there was a sudden interruption. "My foot has turned lame again!" was his announcement to me on the 15th, followed next day by this letter. "Henry Thompson will not let me read to-night, and will not let me go to Scotland to-morrow. Tremendous house here, and also in Edinburgh. Here is the certificate he drew up for himself and Beard to sign. 'We the undersigned hereby certify that Mr. C. D. is suffering from inflammation of the foot (caused by over-exertion), and that we have forbidden his appearance on the platform this evening, as he must keep his room for a day or two.' I have sent up to the Great Western Hotel for apartments, and, if I can get them, shall move there this evening. Heaven knows what engagements this may involve in April! It throws us all back, and will cost me some five hundred pounds."
In the second week of February, he was in London, planning to head back to Scotland (where he had just come from) after the usual weekly reading at St. James's Hall, when something unexpected happened. “My foot has gone lame again!” he told me on the 15th, followed the next day by this letter. “Henry Thompson won’t let me read tonight, and he won’t let me go to Scotland tomorrow. Huge audience here, and also in Edinburgh. Here’s the certificate he had drawn up for himself and Beard to sign. ‘We the undersigned hereby certify that Mr. C. D. is suffering from inflammation of the foot (caused by over-exertion), and that we have forbidden his appearance on the platform this evening, as he must stay in his room for a day or two.’ I’ve requested a room at the Great Western Hotel, and if I can get one, I’ll move there this evening. God knows what commitments this might lead to in April! It puts everything back and will cost me about five hundred pounds.”
A few days' rest again brought so much relief, that, against the urgent entreaties of members of his family as well as other friends, he was in the railway carriage bound for Edinburgh on the morning of the 20th of February, accompanied by Mr. Chappell himself. "I came down lazily on a sofa," he wrote to me from Edinburgh next day, "hardly changing my position the whole way. The railway authorities had done all[453] sorts of things, and I was more comfortable than on the sofa at the hotel. The foot gave me no uneasiness, and has been quiet and steady all night."[282] He was nevertheless under the necessity, two days later, of consulting Mr. Syme; and he told his daughter that this great authority had warned him against over-fatigue in the readings, and given him some slight remedies, but otherwise reported him in "joost pairfactly splendid condition." With care he thought the pain might be got rid of. "'Wa'at mad' Thompson think it was goot?' he said often, and seemed to take that opinion extremely ill." Again before leaving Scotland he saw Mr. Syme, and wrote to me on the second of March of the indignation with which he again treated the gout diagnosis, declaring the disorder to be an affection of the delicate nerves and muscles originating in cold. "I told him that it had shewn itself in America in the other foot as well. 'Noo I'll joost swear,' said he, 'that ayond the fatigue o' the readings ye'd been tramping i' th' snaw, within twa or three days.' I[454] certainly had. 'Wa'al,' said he triumphantly, 'and hoo did it first begin? I' th' snaw. Goot! Bah!—Thompson knew no other name for it, and just ca'd it Goot—Boh!' For which he took two guineas." Yet the famous pupil, Sir Henry Thompson, went certainly nearer the mark than the distinguished master, Mr. Syme, in giving to it a more than local character.
A few days of rest provided so much relief that, despite the urgent pleas from family members and friends, he found himself on a train to Edinburgh on the morning of February 20th, accompanied by Mr. Chappell. "I relaxed on a sofa," he wrote to me from Edinburgh the next day, "barely shifting my position the entire journey. The train was more comfortable than the sofa at the hotel. My foot didn't bother me at all and stayed calm and steady all night." He still needed to see Mr. Syme two days later, and he told his daughter that this expert had cautioned him against over-exerting himself during the readings and had given him some minor remedies, but overall reported him in "just perfectly splendid condition." With care, he thought he could get rid of the pain. "'What did that crazy' Thompson think it was good for?" he often asked, and it seemed to really upset him. Before leaving Scotland, he saw Mr. Syme again and wrote to me on March 2nd about his anger at the repeated gout diagnosis, insisting that the issue stemmed from sensitive nerves and muscles due to cold. "I told him it had also shown up in America in the other foot. 'Now I'll just swear,' he said, 'that besides the fatigue from the readings, you'd been walking in the snow, within two or three days.' I definitely had. 'Well,' he said triumphantly, 'and how did it first start? In the snow. Gout! Bah!—Thompson knew no other name for it and just called it Gout—Bah!' For which he charged two guineas." Yet the renowned pupil, Sir Henry Thompson, certainly got closer to the real issue than the distinguished expert, Mr. Syme, in recognizing a broader significance to it.
The whole of that March month he went on with the scenes from Oliver Twist. "The foot goes famously," he wrote to his daughter. "I feel the fatigue in it (four Murders in one week[283]) but not overmuch. It merely aches at night; and so does the other, sympathetically I suppose." At Hull on the 8th he heard of the death of the old and dear friend, Emerson Tennent, to whom he had inscribed his last book; and on the morning of the 12th I met him at the funeral. He had read the Oliver Twist scenes the night before at York; had just been able to get to the express train, after shortening the pauses in the reading, by a violent rush when it was over; and had travelled through the night. He appeared to, me "dazed" and worn. No man could well look more so than he did, that sorrowful morning.
The entire month of March, he continued with the scenes from Oliver Twist. "The foot is doing really well," he wrote to his daughter. "I feel tired from it (four murders in one week[283]) but not too much. It just aches at night; and so does the other one, I guess sympathetically." On the 8th in Hull, he heard about the death of his old and dear friend, Emerson Tennent, to whom he had dedicated his last book; and on the morning of the 12th, I saw him at the funeral. He had read the Oliver Twist scenes the night before in York; he barely made it to the express train after shortening the pauses in his reading, rushing violently when it was over; and he had traveled through the night. He seemed "dazed" and exhausted to me. No one could have looked more worn than he did that sorrowful morning.
The end was near. A public dinner, which will have mention on a later page, had been given him in Liverpool on the 10th of April, with Lord Dufferin in the chair, and a reading was due from him in Preston on[455] the 22nd of that month. But on Sunday the 18th we had ill report of him from Chester, and on the 21st he wrote from Blackpool to his sister-in-law. "I have come to this Sea-Beach Hotel (charming) for a day's rest. I am much better than I was on Sunday; but shall want careful looking to, to get through the readings. My weakness and deadness are all on the left side; and if I don't look at anything I try to touch with my left hand, I don't know where it is. I am in (secret) consultation with Frank Beard, who says that I have given him indisputable evidences of overwork which he could wish to treat immediately; and so I have telegraphed for him. I have had a delicious walk by the sea to-day, and I sleep soundly, and have picked up amazingly in appetite. My foot is greatly better too, and I wear my own boot." Next day was appointed for the reading at Preston; and from that place he wrote to me, while waiting the arrival of Mr. Beard. "Don't say anything about it, but the tremendously severe nature of this work is a little shaking me. At Chester last Sunday I found myself extremely giddy, and extremely uncertain of my sense of touch, both in the left leg and the left hand and arms. I had been taking some slight medicine of Beard's; and immediately wrote to him describing exactly what I felt, and asking him whether those feelings could be referable to the medicine? He promptly replied: 'There can be no mistaking them from your exact account. The medicine cannot possibly have caused them. I recognise indisputable symptoms of overwork, and I wish to take you in hand without any loss of time.' They have greatly modified since, but he is coming down[456] here this afternoon. To-morrow night at Warrington I shall have but 25 more nights to work through. If he can coach me up for them, I do not doubt that I shall get all right again—as I did when I became free in America. The foot has given me very little trouble. Yet it is remarkable that it is the left foot too; and that I told Henry Thompson (before I saw his old master Syme) that I had an inward conviction that whatever it was, it was not gout. I also told Beard, a year after the Staplehurst accident, that I was certain that my heart had been fluttered, and wanted a little helping. This the stethoscope confirmed; and considering the immense exertion I am undergoing, and the constant jarring of express trains, the case seems to me quite intelligible. Don't say anything in the Gad's direction about my being a little out of sorts. I have broached the matter of course; but very lightly. Indeed there is no reason for broaching it otherwise."
The end was near. A public dinner, which will be mentioned on a later page, was held for him in Liverpool on April 10th, with Lord Dufferin as the chair. He was also scheduled to do a reading in Preston on[455] the 22nd of that month. However, on Sunday the 18th, we received worrying news about him from Chester, and on the 21st he wrote to his sister-in-law from Blackpool. "I've come to this Sea-Beach Hotel (charming) for a day of rest. I'm feeling much better than I was on Sunday, but I still need to be careful to get through the readings. My weakness and numbness are all on my left side; and if I don’t look at anything I try to touch with my left hand, I can't tell where it is. I’m in (secret) consultation with Frank Beard, who says I’ve shown him undeniable signs of overwork that he wants to treat right away, so I’ve telegraphed for him. I had a lovely walk by the sea today, I’m sleeping well, and my appetite has really improved. My foot is much better too, and I'm wearing my own boot." The next day was set for the reading at Preston; and from there he wrote to me while waiting for Mr. Beard to arrive. "Don’t mention it, but the extremely intense nature of this work is shaking me a bit. At Chester last Sunday, I felt very dizzy and very unsure of my sense of touch in both my left leg and my left hand and arms. I had been taking some mild medicine from Beard; and immediately wrote to him detailing exactly what I felt, asking if those feelings could be related to the medicine? He quickly replied: 'There’s no mistaking your description. The medicine couldn’t possibly have caused this. I recognize clear symptoms of overwork, and I want to take care of you right away.' Those symptoms have improved since, but he's coming down[456] here this afternoon. Tomorrow night in Warrington, I'll only have 25 more nights of work to get through. If he can prepare me for those, I’m confident I’ll be fine again—just like I was when I finished in America. My foot hasn’t been much trouble. Yet it’s interesting that it’s the left foot too; and that I told Henry Thompson (before I saw his old mentor Syme) that I had a strong feeling that whatever it was, it wasn’t gout. I also told Beard, a year after the Staplehurst accident, that I was sure my heart had been racing and needed a little support. The stethoscope confirmed this; and considering the huge effort I’m putting in, along with the constant jarring of express trains, the situation makes sense to me. Don’t say anything in Gad’s direction about me feeling a bit off. I’ve brought it up, of course, but very lightly. In fact, there’s no need to bring it up any other way."
Even to the close of that letter he had buoyed himself up with the hope that he might yet be "coached" and that the readings need not be discontinued. But Mr. Beard stopped them at once, and brought his patient to London. On Friday morning the 23rd, the same envelope brought me a note from himself to say that he was well enough, but tired; in perfectly good spirits, not at all uneasy, and writing this himself that I should have it under his own hand; with a note from his eldest son to say that his father appeared to him to be very ill, and that a consultation had been appointed with Sir Thomas Watson. The statement of that distinguished physician, sent to myself in June 1872, completes for the present the sorrowful narrative.[457]
Even by the end of that letter, he had lifted his spirits with the hope that he could still be "coached" and that the readings wouldn't have to stop. But Mr. Beard put an end to them immediately and took his patient to London. On Friday morning the 23rd, the same envelope included a note from him saying he was well enough, but tired; he was in perfectly good spirits, not at all worried, and he wrote this himself so I would have it in his own handwriting; along with a note from his eldest son saying that his father seemed very ill to him, and that a consultation had been arranged with Sir Thomas Watson. The report from that distinguished physician, sent to me in June 1872, completes this sad account for now.[457]
"It was, I think, on the 23rd of April 1869 that I was asked to see Charles Dickens, in consultation with Mr. Carr Beard. After I got home I jotted down, from their joint account, what follows.
"It was, I believe, on April 23, 1869, that I was asked to meet with Charles Dickens, along with Mr. Carr Beard. After I returned home, I noted down what follows from their joint account."
"After unusual irritability, C. D. found himself, last Saturday or Sunday, giddy, with a tendency to go backwards, and to turn round. Afterwards, desiring to put something on a small table, he pushed it and the table forwards, undesignedly. He had some odd feeling of insecurity about his left leg, as if there was something unnatural about his heel; but he could lift, and he did not drag, his leg. Also he spoke of some strangeness of his left hand and arm; missed the spot on which he wished to lay that hand, unless he carefully looked at it; felt an unreadiness to lift his hands towards his head, especially his left hand—when, for instance, he was brushing his hair.
"After feeling unusually irritable, C. D. found himself, last Saturday or Sunday, feeling dizzy, with a tendency to lean backward and spin around. Later, when he tried to put something on a small table, he accidentally pushed both the object and the table forward. He had a strange sensation of insecurity about his left leg, as if something was off with his heel; however, he could lift it and didn’t drag his leg. He also mentioned some odd feelings in his left hand and arm; he would miss the spot where he wanted to place his hand unless he looked carefully at it, and felt reluctant to lift his hands to his head, especially his left hand—like when he was brushing his hair."
"He had written thus to Mr. Carr Beard.
He had written this to Mr. Carr Beard.
"'Is it possible that anything in my medicine can have made me extremely giddy, extremely uncertain of my footing, especially on the left side, and extremely indisposed to raise my hands to my head. These symptoms made me very uncomfortable on Saturday (qy. Sunday?) night, and all yesterday, &c.'
"'Is it possible that anything in my medicine could have made me feel really dizzy, very unsteady, especially on my left side, and very unwilling to lift my hands to my head? These symptoms made me quite uncomfortable on Saturday (or was it Sunday?) night, and all day yesterday, etc.'"
"The state thus described showed plainly that C. D. had been on the brink of an attack of paralysis of his left side, and possibly of apoplexy. It was, no doubt, the result of extreme hurry, overwork, and excitement, incidental to his Readings.
The condition described clearly indicated that C. D. was on the verge of experiencing paralysis on his left side, and possibly a stroke. This was undoubtedly the result of excessive stress, overwork, and excitement related to his Readings.
"On hearing from him Mr. Carr Beard had gone at once to Preston, or Blackburn (I am not sure which),[458] had forbidden his reading that same evening, and had brought him to London.
On hearing from him, Mr. Carr Beard had gone directly to Preston or Blackburn (I'm not sure which),[458] had banned his reading that same evening, and had taken him to London.
"When I saw him he appeared to be well. His mind was unclouded, his pulse quiet. His heart was beating with some slight excess of the natural impulse. He told me he had of late sometimes, but rarely, lost or misused a word; that he forgot names, and numbers, but had always done that; and he promised implicit obedience to our injunctions.
"When I saw him, he seemed to be doing well. His mind was clear, his pulse steady. His heart was beating with a slight increase in its natural rhythm. He told me that lately, he had occasionally, but not often, lost or misused a word; that he forgot names and numbers, but he had always done that; and he promised to fully follow our instructions."
"We gave him the following certificate.
"We provided him with the following certificate."
"'The undersigned certify that Mr. Charles Dickens has been seriously unwell, through great exhaustion and fatigue of body and mind consequent upon his public Readings and long and frequent railway journeys. In our judgment Mr. Dickens will not be able with safety to himself to resume his Readings for several months to come.
"The undersigned confirm that Mr. Charles Dickens has been seriously unwell due to significant exhaustion and fatigue, both physical and mental, resulting from his public readings and lengthy, frequent train journeys. In our opinion, Mr. Dickens will not be able to safely resume his readings for several months."
'F. Carr Beard.'
"However, after some weeks, he expressed a wish for my sanction to his endeavours to redeem, in a careful and moderate way, some of the reading engagements to which he had been pledged before those threatenings of brain-mischief in the North of England.
"However, after a few weeks, he asked for my approval to pursue, in a careful and measured way, some of the reading commitments he had made before those threats of mental issues in the North of England."
"As he had continued uniformly to seem and to feel perfectly well, I did not think myself warranted to refuse that sanction: and in writing to enforce great caution in the trials, I expressed some apprehension that he might fancy we had been too peremptory in our injunctions of mental and bodily repose in April;[459] and I quoted the following remark, which occurs somewhere in one of Captain Cook's Voyages. 'Preventive measures are always invidious, for when most successful, the necessity for them is the least apparent.'
"Since he consistently appeared to be feeling perfectly fine, I didn't think I had a reason to deny that approval. While writing to emphasize the need for caution in the tests, I mentioned some concern that he might think we had been too strict with our demands for mental and physical rest back in April;[459] and I referenced this remark from one of Captain Cook's Voyages: 'Preventive measures always seem questionable, because when they are most successful, the need for them is the least obvious.'"
"I mention this to explain the letter which I send herewith,[284] and which I must beg you to return to me, as a precious remembrance of the writer with whom I had long enjoyed very friendly and much valued relations.
"I mention this to explain the letter I'm sending with this,[284] and I kindly ask you to return it to me, as a cherished keepsake from the writer with whom I have enjoyed a long and valued friendship."
"I scarcely need say that if what I have now written can, in any way, be of use to you, it is entirely at your service and disposal—nor need I say with how much interest I have read the first volume of your late friend's Life. I cannot help regretting that a great pressure of professional work at the time, prevented my making a fuller record of a case so interesting."
"I hardly need to mention that if what I've just written can, in any way, be useful to you, it's completely at your service and disposal—nor do I need to say how much I've enjoyed reading the first volume of your late friend's Life. I can't help but regret that a heavy workload at the time prevented me from keeping a more complete record of such an interesting case."
The twelve readings to which Sir Thomas Watson consented, with the condition that railway travel was not to accompany them, were farther to be delayed until the opening months of 1870. They were an offering from Dickens by way of small compensation to Messrs. Chappell for the breakdown of the enterprise[460] on which they had staked so much. But here practically he finished his career as a public reader, and what remains will come with the end of what is yet to be told. One effort only intervened, by which he hoped to get happily back to his old pursuits; but to this, as to that which preceded it, sterner Fate said also No, and his Last Book, like his Last Readings, prematurely closed.
The twelve readings that Sir Thomas Watson agreed to, with the stipulation that they wouldn't involve railway travel, were pushed back until early 1870. These readings were a gesture from Dickens as a small way to make up for the failure of the venture[460] in which Messrs. Chappell had invested so much. This effectively marked the end of his career as a public reader, and what follows will be revealed with the conclusion of the remaining story. There was only one more effort that intervened, through which he hoped to return to his previous interests; however, like the one before it, harsher Fate said No as well, and his Last Book, much like his Last Readings, was cut short.
CHAPTER XVIII.
LAST BOOK.
1869-1870.
His first fancy for the tale was expressed in a letter in the middle of July. "What should you think of the idea of a story beginning in this way?—Two people, boy and girl, or very young, going apart from one another, pledged to be married after many years—at the end of the book. The interest to arise out of the tracing of their separate ways, and the impossibility of telling what will be done with that impending fate." This was laid aside; but it left a marked trace on the story as afterwards designed, in the position of Edwin Drood and his betrothed.
His first idea for the story came in a letter in mid-July. "What do you think of a story that starts like this?—Two young people, a boy and a girl, going their separate ways, promising to marry after many years—at the end of the book. The interest would come from following their individual paths and the uncertainty of what will happen with that looming fate." This idea was set aside, but it left a significant mark on the story as it evolved, particularly in the situation of Edwin Drood and his fiancée.
I first heard of the later design in a letter dated "Friday the 6th of August 1869," in which after speaking, with the usual unstinted praise he bestowed always on what moved him in others, of a little tale he had received for his journal,[286] he spoke of the change[463] that had occurred to him for the new tale by himself. "I laid aside the fancy I told you of, and have a very curious and new idea for my new story. Not a communicable idea (or the interest of the book would be gone), but a very strong one, though difficult to work." The story, I learnt immediately afterward, was to be that of the murder of a nephew by his uncle; the originality of which was to consist in the review of the murderer's career by himself at the close, when its temptations were to be dwelt upon as if, not he the culprit, but some other man, were the tempted. The last chapters were to be written in the condemned cell, to which his wickedness, all elaborately elicited from him as if told of another, had brought him. Discovery by the murderer of the utter needlessness of the murder for its object, was to follow hard upon commission of the deed; but all discovery of the murderer was to be baffled till towards the close, when, by means of a gold ring which had resisted the corrosive effects of the lime into which he had thrown the body, not only the person murdered was to be identified but the locality of the crime and the man who committed it.[287] So much was told to me before any of the book was written; and it will be recollected that the ring, taken by Drood to be given to his betrothed only if their engagement went on, was brought away with him from their last interview.[464] Rosa was to marry Tartar, and Crisparkle the sister of Landless, who was himself, I think, to have perished in assisting Tartar finally to unmask and seize the murderer.
I first heard about the later design in a letter dated "Friday, August 6, 1869," where he talked, with his usual generous praise for what inspired him in others, about a little story he had received for his journal,[286] and he mentioned the change[463] that had come to him for the new tale he was working on. "I set aside the idea I told you about and came up with a very interesting and fresh concept for my new story. It's not something I can share (or the book would lose its appeal), but it's a strong one, though challenging to develop." I learned right after that the story was going to be about a murder in which a nephew is killed by his uncle. The originality of it would come from the murderer reflecting on his own life at the end as if he were talking about someone else instead of himself. The final chapters were to be written in the death row cell, where his wickedness, pulled from him as though it were about another person, had led him. Soon after committing the murder, the murderer would realize that the killing was completely unnecessary for its intended purpose; however, no discovery of who the murderer was would occur until near the end when a gold ring, which had survived the corrosive effects of the lime where he dumped the body, would not only identify the victim but also reveal the crime scene and the killer.[287] I was told all this before any of the book was written, and it will be remembered that the ring, which Drood intended to give to his fiancée only if their engagement continued, was taken with him from their last meeting.[464] Rosa was set to marry Tartar, and Crisparkle was to marry Landless' sister, who I think was to have died while helping Tartar finally expose and capture the murderer.
Nothing had been written, however, of the main parts of the design excepting what is found in the published numbers; there was no hint or preparation for the sequel in any notes of chapters in advance; and there remained not even what he had himself so sadly written of the book by Thackeray also interrupted by death. The evidence of matured designs never to be accomplished, intentions planned never to be executed, roads of thought marked out never to be traversed, goals shining in the distance never to be reached, was wanting here. It was all a blank. Enough had been completed nevertheless to give promise of a much greater book than its immediate predecessor. "I hope his book is finished," wrote Longfellow when the news of his death was flashed to America. "It is certainly one of his most beautiful works, if not the most beautiful of all. It would be too sad to think the pen had fallen from his hand, and left it incomplete." Some of its characters were touched with subtlety, and in its descriptions his imaginative power was at its best. Not a line was wanting to the reality, in the most minute local detail, of places the most widely contrasted; and we saw with equal vividness the lazy cathedral town and the lurid opium-eater's den.[288] Something like the old lightness and buoyancy[465] of animal spirits gave a new freshness to the humour; the scenes of the child-heroine and her luckless betrothed had both novelty and nicety of character in them; and Mr. Grewgious in chambers with his clerk and the two waiters, the conceited fool Sapsea, and the blustering philanthropist Honeythunder, were first-rate comedy. Miss Twinkleton was of the family of Miss La Creevy; and the lodging-house keeper, Miss Billickin, though she gave Miss Twinkleton but a sorry account of her blood, had that of Mrs. Todgers in her veins. "I was put in life to a very genteel boarding-school, the mistress being no less a lady than yourself, of about your own age, or it may be, some years younger, and a poorness of blood flowed from the table which has run through my life." Was ever anything better said of a school-fare of starved gentility?
Nothing had been written about the main parts of the design besides what’s in the published issues; there was no hint or setup for what came next in any chapter notes; and there wasn’t even what he had sadly written about the book by Thackeray, which was also left unfinished by death. The evidence of plans fully developed yet never realized, intentions plotted never carried out, trails of thought marked but never followed, goals glowing in the distance that would never be met, was absent here. It was all a blank. Still, enough was completed to suggest a much greater book than its immediate predecessor. "I hope his book is finished," Longfellow wrote when the news of his death reached America. "It is certainly one of his most beautiful works, if not the most beautiful of all. It would be too sad to think the pen had dropped from his hand, leaving it unfinished." Some of its characters were subtle, and his imaginative power shone in its descriptions. Every line captured the reality in the smallest local details, even in places that were vastly different; we vividly saw both the lazy cathedral town and the grim opium den. Something of the old lightness and buoyancy of animal spirits brought a new freshness to the humor; the scenes with the child-heroine and her unfortunate fiancé had both originality and charm; and Mr. Grewgious in his office with his clerk and the two waiters, the pompous fool Sapsea, and the blustering philanthropist Honeythunder, created top-notch comedy. Miss Twinkleton was in the same family as Miss La Creevy; and the boarding house owner, Miss Billickin, although she gave Miss Twinkleton a poor account of her lineage, had Mrs. Todgers's blood in her veins. "I was sent to a very respectable boarding school, run by a lady no less than yourself, about your age, or maybe a few years younger, and a drop of poor blood has flowed through my life since that table." Was anything ever better said about the fare of starved gentility?
The last page of Edwin Drood was written in the Châlet in the afternoon of his last day of consciousness; and I have thought there might be some interest in a facsimile of the greater part of this final page of manuscript that ever came from his hand, at which he had worked unusually late in order to finish the chapter. It has very much the character, in its excessive care of correction and interlineation, of all his later manuscripts;[466] and in order that comparison may be made with his earlier and easier method, I place beside it a portion of a page of the original of Oliver Twist. His greater pains and elaboration of writing, it may be mentioned, become first very obvious in the later parts of Martin Chuzzlewit; but not the least remarkable feature in all his manuscripts, is the accuracy with which the portions of each representing the several numbers are exactly adjusted to the space the printer had to fill. Whether without erasure or so interlined as to be illegible, nothing is wanting, and there is nothing in excess. So assured was the habit, that he has himself remarked upon an instance the other way, in Our Mutual Friend, as not having happened to him for thirty years. But Edwin Drood more startlingly showed him how unsettled the habit he most prized had become, in the clashing of old and new pursuits. "When I had written" (22nd of December 1869) "and, as I thought, disposed of the first two Numbers of my story, Clowes informed me to my horror that they were, together, twelve printed pages too short!!! Consequently I had to transpose a chapter from number two to number one, and remodel number two altogether! This was the more unlucky, that it came upon me at the time when I was obliged to leave the book, in order to get up the Readings" (the additional twelve for which Sir Thomas Watson's consent had been obtained), "quite gone out of my mind since I left them off. However, I turned to it and got it done, and both numbers are now in type. Charles Collins has designed an excellent cover." It was his wish that his son-in-law should have illustrated the story; but, this[467] not being practicable, upon an opinion expressed by Mr. Millais which the result thoroughly justified, choice was made of Mr. S. L. Fildes.
The last page of Edwin Drood was written in the Châlet on the afternoon of his final day of awareness; and I thought there might be some interest in sharing a facsimile of most of this last page of manuscript that he ever produced, which he dedicated an unusually late amount of time to in order to complete the chapter. It strongly exhibits his later writing style, characterized by meticulous corrections and interlineations;[466] and to allow for a comparison with his earlier, more straightforward approach, I am placing alongside it a portion of a page from the original Oliver Twist. His more careful and detailed writing becomes especially evident in the latter parts of Martin Chuzzlewit; however, one of the most remarkable aspects of all his manuscripts is how precisely the sections allocated for each number fit the space the printer needed to fill. Whether without erasure or so interlined that it became illegible, nothing was missing, and there was nothing superfluous. He was so accustomed to this practice that he once noted an instance in Our Mutual Friend where this didn’t happen for thirty years. But Edwin Drood more dramatically illustrated just how much his cherished habit had become unsettled due to the clash of old and new interests. “When I had written” (22nd of December 1869) “and, as I believed, finished the first two Numbers of my story, Clowes horrified me by informing me that they were, combined, twelve printed pages too short!!! Consequently, I had to move a chapter from number two to number one and completely redesign number two! This was particularly unfortunate because it struck me just as I had to set the book aside to prepare for the Readings” (the additional twelve for which Sir Thomas Watson's consent had been obtained), “which I had completely forgotten since I stopped working on them. Nonetheless, I went back to it, got it done, and both numbers are now set in type. Charles Collins has created an excellent cover.” He wished his son-in-law to illustrate the story; however, since that wasn’t feasible, upon an opinion from Mr. Millais that was ultimately proven correct, the choice was made to go with Mr. S. L. Fildes.[467]
This reference to the last effort of Dickens's genius had been written as it thus stands, when a discovery of some interest was made by the writer. Within the leaves of one of Dickens's other manuscripts were found some detached slips of his writing, on paper only half the size of that used for the tale, so cramped, interlined, and blotted as to be nearly illegible, which on close inspection proved to be a scene in which Sapsea the auctioneer is introduced as the principal figure, among a group of characters new to the story. The explanation of it perhaps is, that, having become a little nervous about the course of the tale, from a fear that he might have plunged too soon into the incidents leading on to the catastrophe, such as the Datchery assumption in the fifth number (a misgiving he had certainly expressed to his sister-in-law), it had occurred to him to open some fresh veins of character incidental to the interest, though not directly part of it, and so to handle them in connection with Sapsea as a little to suspend the final development even while assisting to strengthen it. Before beginning any number of a serial he used, as we have seen in former instances, to plan briefly what he intended to put into it chapter by chapter; and his first number-plan of Drood had the following: "Mr. Sapsea. Old Tory jackass. Connect Jasper with him. (He will want a solemn donkey by and by):" which was effected by bringing together both[470] Durdles and Jasper, for connection with Sapsea, in the matter of the epitaph for Mrs. Sapsea's tomb. The scene now discovered might in this view have been designed to strengthen and carry forward that element in the tale; and otherwise it very sufficiently expresses itself. It would supply an answer, if such were needed, to those who have asserted that the hopeless decadence of Dickens as a writer had set in before his death. Among the lines last written by him, these are the very last we can ever hope to receive; and they seem to me a delightful specimen of the power possessed by him in his prime, and the rarest which any novelist can have, of revealing a character by a touch. Here are a couple of people, Kimber and Peartree, not known to us before, whom we read off thoroughly in a dozen words; and as to Sapsea himself, auctioneer and mayor of Cloisterham, we are face to face with what before we only dimly realised, and we see the solemn jackass, in his business pulpit, playing off the airs of Mr. Dean in his Cathedral pulpit, with Cloisterham laughing at the impostor.
This reference to the final effort of Dickens's talent was written as it is now, when the author made an interesting discovery. Inside the pages of one of Dickens's other manuscripts were found some loose pieces of his writing, on paper that was only half the size of that used for the story. The text was so cramped, interlined, and messy that it was nearly unreadable, but upon closer inspection, it turned out to be a scene where Sapsea the auctioneer is the main character among a group of characters new to the story. This perhaps explains that he had become a bit anxious about the direction of the tale, fearing he might have jumped too quickly into the events leading to the climax, like the Datchery disguise in the fifth installment (a concern he had definitely shared with his sister-in-law). It seemed to cross his mind to introduce some new characters linked to the story’s interest, even if they weren’t directly part of it, and to tie them to Sapsea, to slightly delay the final developments while helping to bolster them. Before starting any chapter of a serial, as we’ve seen before, he used to briefly plan what he intended to include, chapter by chapter; and his initial outline for Drood had the following: "Mr. Sapsea. Old Tory fool. Connect Jasper with him. (He will need a solemn idiot eventually):" This was realized by bringing together both Durdles and Jasper, connecting them with Sapsea regarding the epitaph for Mrs. Sapsea's tomb. The scene recently discovered may have been meant to enhance and advance that aspect of the tale; and it expresses itself quite well. It would provide a response, if one were necessary, to those who have claimed that Dickens's decline as a writer began before his death. Among the last lines he wrote, these are the very last we can hope to see, and they seem to me to be a delightful example of the skill he possessed in his prime, and the rare ability any novelist can have, of revealing a character with just a touch. Here are a couple of people, Kimber and Peartree, who are new to us, and we understand them completely in just a few words; and regarding Sapsea himself, auctioneer and mayor of Cloisterham, we face what we previously only vaguely understood, and we see the solemn fool, in his business pulpit, mimicking the airs of Mr. Dean in his Cathedral pulpit, with Cloisterham mocking the fraud.
THE EIGHT CLUB.
"TOLD BY HIMSELF.
"Wishing to take the air, I proceeded by a circuitous route to the Club, it being our weekly night of meeting. I found that we mustered our full strength. We were enrolled under the denomination of the Eight Club. We were eight in number; we met at eight o'clock during eight months of the year; we played eight games of four-handed cribbage, at eightpence the[471] game; our frugal supper was composed of eight rolls, eight mutton chops, eight pork sausages, eight baked potatoes, eight marrow-bones, with eight toasts, and eight bottles of ale. There may, or may not, be a certain harmony of colour in the ruling idea of this (to adopt a phrase of our lively neighbours) reunion. It was a little idea of mine.
"Wanting to get some fresh air, I took a winding route to the Club since it was our weekly meeting night. I found that we had our full turnout. We were known as the Eight Club. There were eight of us; we met at eight o'clock for eight months out of the year; we played eight games of four-handed cribbage, at eight pence per game; our simple supper consisted of eight rolls, eight mutton chops, eight pork sausages, eight baked potatoes, eight marrow-bones, along with eight toasts and eight bottles of ale. There may or may not be a certain color harmony in the main theme of this (to borrow a phrase from our vibrant neighbors) gathering. It was a little idea of mine."
"A somewhat popular member of the Eight Club, was a member by the name of Kimber. By profession, a dancing-master. A commonplace, hopeful sort of man, wholly destitute of dignity or knowledge of the world.
A somewhat well-known member of the Eight Club was a guy named Kimber. He worked as a dance teacher. He was a typical, optimistic kind of man, totally lacking in dignity or any real understanding of the world.
"As I entered the Club-room, Kimber was making the remark: 'And he still half-believes him to be very high in the Church.'
"As I walked into the Club room, Kimber was saying, 'And he still kinda believes he's really high up in the Church.'"
"In the act of hanging up my hat on the eighth peg by the door, I caught Kimber's visual ray. He lowered it, and passed a remark on the next change of the moon. I did not take particular notice of this at the moment, because the world was often pleased to be a little shy of ecclesiastical topics in my presence. For I felt that I was picked out (though perhaps only through a coincidence) to a certain extent to represent what I call our glorious constitution in Church and State. The phrase may be objected to by captious minds; but I own to it as mine. I threw it off in argument some little time back. I said: 'Our Glorious Constitution in Church and State.'
"In the process of hanging up my hat on the eighth peg by the door, I caught Kimber's gaze. He lowered it and made a comment about the next change of the moon. I didn’t really pay much attention to this at the time because people often seemed a bit hesitant to discuss religious topics in my presence. I felt, perhaps just by coincidence, that I was somewhat chosen to represent what I like to call our glorious constitution in Church and State. Some might take issue with that phrase, but I own it as mine. I used it in an argument a little while ago. I said: Our Amazing Constitution in Church and State."
"Another member of the Eight Club was Peartree; also member of the Royal College of Surgeons. Mr. Peartree is not accountable to me for his opinions, and I say no more of them here than that he attends the[472] poor gratis whenever they want him, and is not the parish doctor. Mr. Peartree may justify it to the grasp of his mind thus to do his republican utmost to bring an appointed officer into contempt. Suffice it that Mr. Peartree can never justify it to the grasp of mine.
"Another member of the Eight Club was Peartree; he is also a member of the Royal College of Surgeons. Mr. Peartree doesn't owe me an explanation for his opinions, and I won't say more about them here than that he provides free care to the poor whenever they need him, though he is not the parish doctor. Mr. Peartree may find a way to rationalize his actions in his mind as a means to undermine an appointed officer. However, that does not make sense to me."
"Between Peartree and Kimber there was a sickly sort of feeble-minded alliance. It came under my particular notice when I sold off Kimber by auction. (Goods taken in execution). He was a widower in a white under-waistcoat, and slight shoes with bows, and had two daughters not ill-looking. Indeed the reverse. Both daughters taught dancing in scholastic establishments for Young Ladies—had done so at Mrs. Sapsea's; nay, Twinkleton's—and both, in giving lessons, presented the unwomanly spectacle of having little fiddles tucked under their chins. In spite of which, the younger one might, if I am correctly informed—I will raise the veil so far as to say I know she might—have soared for life from this degrading taint, but for having the class of mind allotted to what I call the common herd, and being so incredibly devoid of veneration as to become painfully ludicrous.
"Between Peartree and Kimber, there was a weak sort of partnership. I particularly noticed it when I auctioned off Kimber's belongings. He was a widower wearing a white vest and light shoes with bows, and he had two not unattractive daughters. In fact, quite the opposite. Both daughters taught dancing at schools for young ladies—had done so at Mrs. Sapsea's and even at Twinkleton's—and while giving lessons, they presented the unusual sight of holding tiny violins under their chins. Despite this, the younger one might, if I'm correctly informed—I can say that I know she might—have escaped this embarrassing situation, but she was unfortunately of the mindset typical of the common crowd, and her lack of respect was painfully ridiculous."
"When I sold off Kimber without reserve, Peartree (as poor as he can hold together) had several prime household lots knocked down to him. I am not to be blinded; and of course it was as plain to me what he was going to do with them, as it was that he was a brown hulking sort of revolutionary subject who had been in India with the soldiers, and ought (for the sake of society) to have his neck broke. I saw the lots shortly afterwards in Kimber's lodgings—through the[473] window—and I easily made out that there had been a sneaking pretence of lending them till better times. A man with a smaller knowledge of the world than myself might have been led to suspect that Kimber had held back money from his creditors, and fraudulently bought the goods. But, besides that I knew for certain he had no money, I knew that this would involve a species of forethought not to be made compatible with the frivolity of a caperer, inoculating other people with capering, for his bread.
"When I sold Kimber without any minimum bid, Peartree (as broke as he is) ended up getting several top-quality household items. I’m not fooled; it was clear to me what he planned to do with them, just as it was that he was a bulky, brown revolutionary type who had served in India with the soldiers, and he really should have been dealt with decisively for the sake of society. I saw the items not long after in Kimber's place—through the [473] window—and it was obvious that there was a sneaky pretense of lending them out until better days. Someone less worldly than I might have thought Kimber was holding back money from his creditors and buying the goods deceitfully. But aside from knowing for sure he had no money, I also recognized that this would require a level of planning inconsistent with the carelessness of someone who’s just playing around, leading others into frivolity to get by."
"As it was the first time I had seen either of those two since the sale, I kept myself in what I call Abeyance. When selling him up, I had delivered a few remarks—shall I say a little homely?—concerning Kimber, which the world did regard as more than usually worth notice. I had come up into my pulpit;, it was said, uncommonly like—and a murmur of recognition had repeated his (I will not name whose) title, before I spoke. I had then gone on to say that all present would find, in the first page of the catalogue that was lying before them, in the last paragraph before the first lot, the following words: 'Sold in pursuance of a writ of execution issued by a creditor.' I had then proceeded to remind my friends, that however frivolous, not to say contemptible, the business by which a man got his goods together, still his goods were as dear to him, and as cheap to society (if sold without reserve), as though his pursuits had been of a character that would bear serious contemplation. I had then divided my text (if I may be allowed so to call it) into three heads: firstly, Sold; secondly, In pursuance of a writ of execution; thirdly, Issued by a creditor; with[474] a few moral reflections on each, and winding up with, 'Now to the first lot' in a manner that was complimented when I afterwards mingled with my hearers.
"As it was the first time I’d seen either of those two since the sale, I kept myself in what I call a state of Abeyance. When I sold him off, I had made a few comments—shall I say a little folksy?—about Kimber, which the world considered more than usually noteworthy. I had come up to my podium; it was said, looking quite similar—and a murmur of recognition had echoed his (I won’t mention whose) title before I spoke. I then went on to say that everyone present would find, in the first page of the catalog lying in front of them, in the last paragraph before the first lot, the following words: 'Sold in accordance with a writ of execution issued by a creditor.' I then reminded my friends that however trivial, not to mention contemptible, the way a man acquired his goods may be, his goods were just as precious to him, and just as inexpensive to society (if sold without reserve), as if his endeavors were of a nature deserving serious consideration. I then broke down my message (if you will allow me to call it that) into three parts: firstly, Sold; secondly, In accordance with a writ of execution; thirdly, Issued by a creditor; with[474] a few moral reflections on each, wrapping up with, 'Now to the first lot' in a way that was praised when I later mingled with my audience."
"So, not being certain on what terms I and Kimber stood, I was grave, I was chilling. Kimber, however, moving to me, I moved to Kimber. (I was the creditor who had issued the writ. Not that it matters.)
"So, not being sure about the relationship between Kimber and me, I felt serious and a bit cold. However, as Kimber approached me, I went towards Kimber. (I was the creditor who had issued the writ. Not that it matters.)"
"'I was alluding, Mr. Sapsea,' said Kimber, 'to a stranger who entered into conversation with me in the street as I came to the Club. He had been speaking to you just before, it seemed, by the churchyard; and though you had told him who you were, I could hardly persuade him that you were not high in the Church.'
"'I was hinting at something, Mr. Sapsea,' said Kimber, 'about a stranger who struck up a conversation with me on the street as I headed to the Club. He had just been talking to you by the churchyard, and even though you told him who you were, I could barely convince him that you weren’t someone important in the Church.'"
"'Idiot!' said Peartree.
"'Idiot!' Peartree exclaimed."
"'Ass!' said Kimber.
"'Ass!' Kimber exclaimed."
"'Idiot and Ass!" said the other five members.
"'Idiot and Ass!' said the other five members."
"'Idiot and Ass, gentlemen,' I remonstrated, looking around me, 'are strong expressions to apply to a young man of good appearance and address.' My generosity was roused; I own it.
"'Idiot and Ass, gentlemen,' I protested, looking around me, 'are harsh terms to use for a young man who has a good appearance and manner.' I admit, my sense of generosity was stirred."
"'You'll admit that he must be a Fool,' said Peartree.
"'You have to admit that he must be a fool,' said Peartree."
"'You can't deny that he must be a Blockhead, said Kimber.
"'You can't deny that he must be an idiot,' said Kimber.
"Their tone of disgust amounted to being offensive. Why should the young man be so calumniated? What had he done? He had only made an innocent and natural mistake. I controlled my generous indignation, and said so.[475]
"Their disgust was downright offensive. Why should the young man be slandered like this? What had he done? He merely made an innocent, natural mistake. I held back my outrage and said as much.[475]
"'Natural?' repeated Kimber; 'He's a Natural!'
"'Natural?' repeated Kimber; 'He's a natural!'"
"The remaining six members of the Eight Club laughed unanimously. It stung me. It was a scornful laugh. My anger was roused in behalf of an absent, friendless stranger. I rose (for I had been sitting down).
"The other six members of the Eight Club laughed together. It hurt me. It was a mocking laugh. My anger was ignited on behalf of a missing, friendless stranger. I stood up (since I had been sitting down).
"'Gentlemen,' I said with dignity, 'I will not remain one of this Club allowing opprobrium to be cast on an unoffending person in his absence. I will not so violate what I call the sacred rites of hospitality. Gentlemen, until you know how to behave yourselves better, I leave you. Gentlemen, until then I withdraw, from this place of meeting, whatever personal qualifications I may have brought into it. Gentlemen, until then you cease to be the Eight Club, and must make the best you can of becoming the Seven.'
"'Gentlemen,' I said with dignity, 'I will not stay a member of this Club while you cast shame on an innocent person in their absence. I refuse to violate what I consider the sacred rules of hospitality. Until you learn to behave better, I am leaving. Until then, I withdraw from this meeting place, regardless of any personal qualities I may have contributed. Until then, you are no longer the Eight Club, and you'll have to make the best of being the Seven.'"
"I put on my hat and retired. As I went down stairs I distinctly heard them give a suppressed cheer. Such is the power of demeanour and knowledge of mankind. I had forced it out of them.
"I put on my hat and headed out. As I went downstairs, I clearly heard them let out a quiet cheer. That's the power of demeanor and understanding people. I had squeezed it out of them."
"Whom should I meet in the street, within a few yards of the door of the inn where the Club was held, but the self-same young man whose cause I had felt it my duty so warmly—and I will add so disinterestedly—to take up.
"Who should I run into on the street, just a few yards from the inn where the Club was held, but the same young man whose case I had felt it my duty to support so passionately—and I’ll add, so selflessly."
"Is it Mr. Sapsea,' he said doubtfully, 'or is it——'
"Is it Mr. Sapsea?" he said uncertainly, "or is it——"
"'It is Mr. Sapsea,' I replied.
"It's Mr. Sapsea," I said.
"'Pardon me, Mr. Sapsea; you appear warm, sir,'[476]
"'Excuse me, Mr. Sapsea; you seem hot, sir,'[476]
"'I have been warm,' I said, 'and on your account.' Having stated the circumstances at some length (my generosity almost overpowered him), I asked him his name.
"I’ve been feeling warm," I said, "and it's because of you." After explaining the situation in detail (my generosity nearly overwhelmed him), I asked for his name.
"'Mr. Sapsea,' he answered, looking down, 'your penetration is so acute, your glance into the souls of your fellow men is so penetrating, that if I was hardy enough to deny that my name is Poker, what would it avail me?'
"'Mr. Sapsea,' he replied, looking down, 'your insight is so sharp, your ability to see into the souls of others is so deep, that if I were bold enough to deny that my name is Poker, what would it matter?'"
"I don't know that I had quite exactly made out to a fraction that his name was Poker, but I daresay I had been pretty near doing it.
"I don't know if I had really figured out exactly that his name was Poker, but I guess I was pretty close."
"'Well, well,' said I, trying to put him at his ease by nodding my head in a soothing way. 'Your name is Poker, and there is no harm in being named Poker.'
"'Well, well,' I said, trying to make him feel more comfortable by nodding my head in a calming way. 'Your name is Poker, and there's nothing wrong with being named Poker.'"
"'Oh Mr. Sapsea!' cried the young man, in a very well-behaved manner. 'Bless you for those words!' He then, as if ashamed of having given way to his feelings, looked down again.
"'Oh Mr. Sapsea!' exclaimed the young man, in a very polite way. 'Thank you for those words!' He then, as if embarrassed for showing his emotions, looked down again."
"'Come, Poker,' said I, 'let me hear more about you. Tell me. Where are you going to, Poker? and where do you come from?'
"'Come on, Poker,' I said, 'let me learn more about you. What's your destination, Poker? And where are you coming from?'"
"'Ah Mr. Sapsea!' exclaimed the young man. 'Disguise from you is impossible. You know already that I come from somewhere, and am going somewhere else. If I was to deny it, what would it avail me?'
"'Ah Mr. Sapsea!' the young man exclaimed. 'It's impossible to hide from you. You already know that I come from somewhere and I'm heading somewhere else. If I were to deny it, what good would that do me?'"
"'Then don't deny it,' was my remark.
"'Then don't deny it,' was my response."
"'Or,' pursued Poker, in a kind of despondent rapture, 'or if I was to deny that I came to this town to see and hear you sir, what would it avail me? Or if I was to deny——'[477]"
"'Or,' continued Poker, in a kind of sad excitement, 'or if I were to deny that I came to this town to see and hear you, sir, what would it matter? Or if I were to deny——'[477]"
The fragment ends there, and the hand that could alone have completed it is at rest for ever.
The fragment ends there, and the hand that could have completed it is at rest forever.
Some personal characteristics remain for illustration before the end is briefly told.
Some personal traits still need to be highlighted before the story comes to a close.
CHAPTER XIX.
PERSONAL CHARACTERISTICS.
1836-1870.
Objection has been taken to this biography as likely to disappoint its readers in not making them "talk to Dickens as Boswell makes them talk to Johnson." But where will the blame lie if a man takes up Pickwick and is disappointed to find that he is not reading Rasselas[479]? A book must be judged for what it aims to be, and not for what it cannot by possibility be. I suppose so remarkable an author as Dickens hardly ever lived who carried so little of authorship into ordinary social intercourse. Potent as the sway of his writings was over him, it expressed itself in other ways. Traces or triumphs of literary labour, displays of conversational or other personal predominance, were no part of the influence he exerted over friends. To them he was only the pleasantest of companions, with whom they forgot that he had ever written anything, and felt only the charm which a nature of such capacity for supreme enjoyment causes every one around it to enjoy. His talk was unaffected and natural, never bookish in the smallest degree. He was quite up to the average of well read men, but as there was no ostentation of it in his writing, so neither was there in his conversation. This was so attractive because so keenly observant, and lighted up with so many touches of humorous fancy; but, with every possible thing to give relish to it, there were not many things to bring away.
Disagreement has been raised to this biography for likely disappointing its readers by not allowing them to "talk to Dickens as Boswell makes them talk to Johnson." But where does the blame rest if someone picks up Pickwick and is let down because they aren't reading Rasselas[479]? A book should be evaluated based on its intentions, not on what it can never be. I suppose such an exceptional author as Dickens rarely existed who brought so little of his authorial persona into everyday social interactions. Despite the strong influence his writings had on him, it expressed itself in different ways. Signs of literary effort, displays of conversational prowess, or any personal dominance were not part of the impact he had on friends. To them, he was simply the most enjoyable companion, with whom they would forget he had ever written anything and just feel the magic of a person with such a capacity for immense enjoyment that made everyone around him feel happy too. His conversation was genuine and natural, never at all bookish. He was quite knowledgeable like any well-read person, but just as there was no showiness in his writing, there was none in his conversation either. It was incredibly engaging because it was so observant and filled with humorous insights; yet, despite all that made it enjoyable, there wasn't much to take away.
Of course a book must stand or fall by its contents. Macaulay said very truly that the place of books in the public estimation is fixed, not by what is written about them, but by what is written in them. I offer no complaint of any remark made upon these volumes, but there have been some misapprehensions. Though Dickens bore outwardly so little of the impress of his writings, they formed the whole of that inner life which essentially constituted the man; and as in this respect he was actually, I have thought that his biography should endeavour to present him. The story of[480] his books, therefore, at all stages of their progress, and of the hopes or designs connected with them, was my first care. With that view, and to give also to the memoir what was attainable of the value of autobiography, letters to myself, such as were never addressed to any other of his correspondents, and covering all the important incidents in the life to be retraced, were used with few exceptions exclusively; and though the exceptions are much more numerous in the present volume, this general plan has guided me to the end. Such were my limits indeed, that half even of those letters had to be put aside; and to have added all such others as were open to me would have doubled the size of my book, not contributed to it a new fact of life or character, and altered materially its design. It would have been so much lively illustration added to the subject, but out of place here. The purpose here was to make Dickens the sole central figure in the scenes revived, narrator as well as principal actor; and only by the means employed could consistency or unity be given to the self-revelation, and the picture made definite and clear. It is the peculiarity of few men to be to their most intimate friend neither more nor less than they are to themselves, but this was true of Dickens; and what kind or quality of nature such intercourse expressed in him, of what strength, tenderness, and delicacy susceptible, of what steady level warmth, of what daily unresting activity of intellect, of what unbroken continuity of kindly impulse through the change and vicissitude of three-and-thirty years, the letters to myself given in these volumes could alone express. Gathered from various and differing sources, their[481] interest could not have been as the interest of these; in which everything comprised in the successive stages of a most attractive career is written with unexampled candour and truthfulness, and set forth in definite pictures of what he saw and stood in the midst of, unblurred by vagueness or reserve. Of the charge of obtruding myself to which their publication has exposed me, I can only say that I studied nothing so hard as to suppress my own personality, and have to regret my ill success where I supposed I had even too perfectly succeeded. But we have all of us frequent occasion to say, parodying Mrs. Peachem's remark, that we are bitter bad judges of ourselves.
Of course, a book's value relies on its content. Macaulay rightly said that how the public views books is determined not by what's said about them, but by what's written in them. I have no complaints about the comments made on these volumes, but there have been some misunderstandings. Despite the fact that Dickens didn't outwardly reflect much of his writings, those writings constituted the entire inner life that essentially made up the man; and because of this, I believed his biography should reflect that. Thus, the story of his books, at every stage of development, and the hopes or plans tied to them, was my primary focus. To achieve this and to give the memoir some of the value of autobiography, I used letters addressed to me—letters that he never sent to any other correspondents—that cover all the significant events in the life being chronicled, with few exceptions. While there are many more exceptions in this volume, this general approach has guided me throughout. My limitations were such that I had to set aside half of those letters; including all the others I had access to would have doubled the book's length without adding any new facts about his life or character and would have significantly changed its intention. It would have been a lively illustration related to the subject, but it wouldn’t fit here. The goal was to make Dickens the sole central figure in the revived scenes—both the narrator and the main character; and through the chosen means, I could provide consistency or unity to the self-revelation, making the portrayal clear and precise. Few men are the same with their closest friends as they are with themselves, but this was true of Dickens; and the kind of nature expressed in that relationship—his strength, tenderness, delicacy, steady warmth, unceasing intellectual activity, and continuous kindness throughout the ups and downs of thirty-three years—could only be conveyed through the letters to me presented in these volumes. Gathered from various sources, their interest could never match that of these letters, which contain everything within the various stages of a very captivating career, written with unmatched honesty and clarity, depicting precisely what he saw and experienced without vagueness or reservation. Regarding the charge of making myself too prominent through their publication, I can only say that I worked very hard to suppress my own identity and regret my lack of success where I thought I had succeeded too well. However, we all often find ourselves saying, echoing Mrs. Peachem's remark, that we are very poor judges of ourselves.
The other properties of these letters are quite subordinate to this main fact that the man who wrote them is thus perfectly seen in them. But they do not lessen the estimate of his genius. Admiration rises higher at the writer's mental forces, who, putting so much of himself into his work for the public, had still so much overflowing for such private intercourse. The sunny health of nature in them is manifest; its largeness, spontaneity, and manliness; but they have also that which highest intellects appreciate best. "I have read them," Lord Russell wrote to me, "with delight and pain. His heart, his imagination, his qualities of painting what is noble, and finding diamonds hidden far away, are greater here than even his works convey to me. How I lament he was not spared to us longer. I shall have a fresh grief when he dies in your volumes." Shallower people are more apt to find other things. If the bonhommie of a man's genius is obvious to all the world, there are plenty of knowing ones ready to take[482] the shine out of the genius, to discover that after all it is not so wonderful, that what is grave in it wants depth, and the humour has something mechanical. But it will be difficult even for these to look over letters so marvellous in the art of reproducing to the sight what has once been seen, so natural and unstudied in their wit and fun, and with such a constant well-spring of sprightly runnings of speech in them, point of epigram, ingenuity of quaint expression, absolute freedom from every touch of affectation, and to believe that the source of this man's humour, or of whatever gave wealth to his genius, was other than habitual, unbounded, and resistless.
The other qualities of these letters are secondary to the main fact that the man who wrote them is clearly visible in them. But this doesn’t diminish our appreciation of his genius. Admiration grows deeper for the writer's mental strength, who, by putting so much of himself into his work for the public, still has so much left over for personal connections. The bright vitality of nature shines through; its expansiveness, spontaneity, and masculinity are evident. Yet they also possess what the greatest minds value most. "I've read them," Lord Russell wrote to me, "with both delight and pain. His heart, his imagination, his ability to portray what is noble, and to discover hidden gems, are even greater here than what his works convey to me. How I regret that he wasn’t with us longer. I will feel a fresh sorrow when he passes away in your volumes." Shallower people are more likely to focus on other aspects. If the friendliness of a man’s genius is clear to everyone, there are always those who are eager to diminish that genius, to argue that it’s not so remarkable after all, that what’s serious lacks depth, and that the humor feels somewhat automated. However, even for them, it will be tough to overlook letters so remarkable in their ability to vividly recreate what has been seen, so natural and effortless in their wit and humor, with such a constant wellspring of lively speech, sharp epigrams, clever expression, and total absence of affectation, and to believe that the source of this man's humor, or whatever gave richness to his genius, was anything other than habitual, boundless, and unstoppable.
There is another consideration of some importance. Sterne did not more incessantly fall back from his works upon himself than Dickens did, and undoubtedly one of the impressions left by the letters is that of the intensity and tenacity with which he recognized, realized, contemplated, cultivated, and thoroughly enjoyed, his own individuality in even its most trivial manifestations. But if any one is led to ascribe this to self-esteem, to a narrow exclusiveness, or to any other invidious form of egotism, let him correct the impression by observing how Dickens bore himself amid the universal blazing-up of America, at the beginning and at the end of his career. Of his hearty, undisguised, and unmistakeable enjoyment of his astonishing and indeed quite bewildering popularity, there can be as little doubt as that there is not a particle of vanity in it, any more than of false modesty or grimace.[289] While[483] realizing fully the fact of it, and the worth of the fact, there is not in his whole being a fibre that answers falsely to the charmer's voice. Few men in the world, one fancies, could have gone through such grand displays of fireworks, not merely with so marvellous an absence of what the French call pose, but unsoiled by the smoke of a cracker. No man's strong individuality was ever so free from conceit.
There’s another important thing to consider. Sterne didn’t retreat into himself more often than Dickens did, and one of the impressions left by the letters is the intensity and persistence with which he recognized, understood, reflected on, nurtured, and truly enjoyed his own individuality, even in its most trivial expressions. However, if anyone thinks this is due to self-esteem, narrow-mindedness, or some other negative form of egotism, they should adjust that view by observing how Dickens conducted himself during the overwhelming excitement in America at both the start and end of his career. There can be no doubt about his genuine, open, and unmistakable enjoyment of his astonishing and, indeed, quite bewildering popularity, just as there is no trace of vanity in it, nor of false modesty or pretense.[289] While[483] fully recognizing the fact and its significance, there isn’t a single part of him that responds insincerely to the charmer's voice. It seems few people could have experienced such grand displays of fireworks, not just with such marvelous lack of what the French call pose, but also unscathed by the smoke of a firecracker. No one’s strong individuality was ever so free from conceit.
Other personal incidents and habits, and especially some matters of opinion of grave importance, will help to make his character better known. Much questioning followed a brief former reference to his religious belief, but, inconsistent or illogical as the conduct described may be, there is nothing to correct or to modify in my statement of it;[290] and, to what otherwise appeared to be in doubt, explicit answer will be afforded by a letter, written upon the youngest of his children leaving home in September 1868 to join his brother in Australia, than which none worthier appears in his story. "I write this note to-day because your[484] going away is much upon my mind, and because I want you to have a few parting words from me, to think of now and then at quiet times. I need not tell you that I love you dearly, and am very, very sorry in my heart to part with you. But this life is half made up of partings, and these pains must be borne. It is my comfort and my sincere conviction that you are going to try the life for which you are best fitted. I think its freedom and wildness more suited to you than any experiment in a study or office would have been; and without that training, you could have followed no other suitable occupation. What you have always wanted until now, has been a set, steady, constant purpose. I therefore exhort you to persevere in a thorough determination to do whatever you have to do, as well as you can do it. I was not so old as you are now, when I first had to win my food, and to do it out of this determination; and I have never slackened in it since. Never take a mean advantage of any one in any transaction, and never be hard upon people who are in your power. Try to do to others as you would have them do to you, and do not be discouraged if they fail sometimes. It is much better for you that they should fail in obeying the greatest rule laid down by Our Saviour than that you should. I put a New Testament among your books for the very same reasons, and with the very same hopes, that made me write an easy account of it for you, when you were a little child. Because it is the best book that ever was, or will be, known in the world; and because it teaches you the best lessons by which any human creature, who tries to be truthful and faithful to duty, can possibly be guided. As your brothers[485] have gone away, one by one, I have written to each such words as I am now writing to you, and have entreated them all to guide themselves by this Book, putting aside the interpretations and inventions of Man. You will remember that you have never at home been harassed about religious observances, or mere formalities. I have always been anxious not to weary my children with such things, before they are old enough to form opinions respecting them. You will therefore understand the better that I now most solemnly impress upon you the truth and beauty of the Christian Religion, as it came from Christ Himself, and the impossibility of your going far wrong if you humbly but heartily respect it. Only one thing more on this head. The more we are in earnest as to feeling it, the less we are disposed to hold forth about it. Never abandon the wholesome practice of saying your own private prayers, night and morning. I have never abandoned it myself, and I know the comfort of it. I hope you will always be able to say in after life, that you had a kind father. You cannot show your affection for him so well, or make him so happy, as by doing your duty." They who most intimately knew Dickens will know best that every word there is written from his heart, and is radiant with the truth of his nature.
Other personal experiences and habits, especially some matters of significant opinion, will help clarify his character. After a brief previous mention of his religious beliefs, there was much questioning, but regardless of how inconsistent or illogical his actions may seem, there's nothing to change or revise in my account of them; [290] and to what previously appeared uncertain, a clear answer will be provided by a letter written when the youngest of his children left home in September 1868 to join his brother in Australia, which is a notable part of his story. "I’m writing this note today because your departure is heavy on my mind, and I want you to have a few parting words from me to remember during quiet moments. I don't need to tell you that I love you dearly and that it truly saddens me to say goodbye. But life involves many farewells, and we must endure those pains. It comforts me and I genuinely believe that you're going to pursue a life suited for you. I think its freedom and wildness is better for you than any kind of office work or study; without that experience, you wouldn't have been able to find a fitting occupation. What you’ve always needed until now is a clear, steady purpose. So, I encourage you to stay determined to do whatever you have to do to the best of your ability. I wasn’t much older than you when I first had to earn my living based on that same determination; I've never wavered since. Never take unfair advantage of anyone in any situation, and don’t be harsh with those in your power. Treat others the way you want to be treated, and don’t feel discouraged if they stumble sometimes. It’s far better for you that they fail to follow the greatest rule our Savior gave than for you to do so. I included a New Testament among your books for the same reasons and hopes I had when I wrote a simple version for you as a child. Because it’s the best book ever known, and it teaches the best lessons to guide anyone trying to be truthful and faithful to their duties. As your brothers have left, one by one, I’ve penned similar words to each of them and urged them to follow this Book, disregarding human interpretations and inventions. You’ll remember that you were never pressured at home about religious practices or mere formalities. I've always wanted to avoid overwhelming my children with such things before they could form their own opinions. So, you’ll understand more clearly that I now earnestly stress the truth and beauty of the Christian faith, as it was given by Christ Himself, and how unlikely it is you’ll go far wrong if you humbly and sincerely respect it. Just one more thing on this subject: the more seriously we take our feelings about it, the less we tend to preach about it. Never give up the healthy practice of saying your own personal prayers, morning and night. I’ve never stopped doing it, and I know how comforting it is. I hope you can always look back and say you had a kind father. You can show your love for him best, and make him happiest, by fulfilling your responsibilities." Those who knew Dickens best will recognize that every word is heartfelt and reflects the truth of his character.
To the same effect, in the leading matter, he expressed himself twelve years before, and again the day before his death; replying in both cases to correspondents who had addressed him as a public writer. A clergyman, the Rev. R. H. Davies, had been struck by the hymn in the Christmas tale of the Wreck of the Golden Mary (Household Words, 1856). "I beg to[486] thank you" Dickens answered (Christmas Eve, 1856) "for your very acceptable letter—not the less gratifying to me because I am myself the writer you refer to. . . . There cannot be many men, I believe, who have a more humble veneration for the New Testament, or a more profound conviction of its all-sufficiency, than I have. If I am ever (as you tell me I am) mistaken on this subject, it is because I discountenance all obtrusive professions of and tradings in religion, as one of the main causes why real Christianity has been retarded in this world; and because my observation of life induces me to hold in unspeakable dread and horror, those unseemly squabbles about the letter which drive the spirit out of hundreds of thousands." In precisely similar tone, to a reader of Edwin Drood (Mr. J. M. Makeham), who had pointed out to him that his employment as a figure of speech of a line from Holy Writ in his tenth chapter might be subject to misconstruction, he wrote from Gadshill on Wednesday the eighth of June, 1870. "It would be quite inconceivable to me, but for your letter, that any reasonable reader could possibly attach a scriptural reference to that passage. . . . I am truly shocked to find that any reader can make the mistake. I have always striven in my writings to express veneration for the life and lessons of our Saviour; because I feel it; and because I re-wrote that history for my children—every one of whom knew it, from having it repeated to them, long before they could read, and almost as soon as they could speak. But I have never made proclamation of this from the house tops."[291]
To the same effect, in the main topic, he expressed himself twelve years earlier and again the day before his death, responding in both instances to correspondents who addressed him as a public writer. A clergyman, the Rev. R. H. Davies, had been moved by the hymn in the Christmas story of the Wreck of the Golden Mary (Household Words, 1856). "I want to thank you," Dickens replied (Christmas Eve, 1856), "for your very nice letter—not any less gratifying to me because I am the writer you mentioned. ... There can't be many people, I believe, who have a more humble respect for the New Testament, or a deeper conviction of its completeness, than I have. If I am ever (as you tell me I am) mistaken on this subject, it’s because I disapprove of all loud declarations and commercializing of religion, as one of the main reasons why true Christianity has been held back in this world; and because my observations of life lead me to hold in profound dread and horror those inappropriate arguments about the letter that drive the spirit out of countless people." In exactly the same tone, to a reader of Edwin Drood (Mr. J. M. Makeham), who pointed out that his use of a line from scripture in his tenth chapter could be misunderstood, he wrote from Gadshill on Wednesday, June 8, 1870. "It would be completely inconceivable to me, if not for your letter, that any reasonable reader could possibly attach a scriptural reference to that passage. ... I am truly shocked to discover that any reader could make such a mistake. I have always tried in my writings to express admiration for the life and teachings of our Savior; because I feel it; and because I rewrote that history for my children—each of whom knew it, having it repeated to them long before they could read, and almost as soon as they could speak. But I have never proclaimed this from the rooftops." [291]
A dislike of all display was rooted in him; and his objection to posthumous honours, illustrated by the instructions in his will, was very strikingly expressed two years before his death, when Mr. Thomas Fairbairn asked his help to a proposed recognition of Rajah Brooke's services by a memorial in Westminster Abbey. "I am very strongly impelled" (24th of June 1868) "to comply with any request of yours. But these posthumous honours of committee, subscriptions, and Westminster Abbey are so profoundly unsatisfactory in my eyes that—plainly—I would rather have nothing to do with them in any case. My daughter and her aunt unite with me in kindest regards to Mrs. Fairbairn, and I hope you will believe in the possession of mine until I am quietly buried without any memorial but such as I have set up in my lifetime." Asked a year later (August 1869) to say something on the inauguration of Leigh Hunt's bust at his grave in Kensal-green, he told the committee that he had a very strong objection to speech-making beside graves. "I do not expect or wish my feelings in this wise to guide other men; still, it is so serious with me, and the idea of ever being the subject of such a ceremony myself is so repugnant to my soul, that I must decline to officiate."
He had a strong dislike for any kind of display, and his stance against posthumous honors, as shown in the instructions in his will, was clearly articulated two years before his death. When Mr. Thomas Fairbairn asked for his support in recognizing Rajah Brooke's services with a memorial in Westminster Abbey, he replied on June 24, 1868, "I feel very strongly compelled to comply with any request from you. However, these posthumous honors involving committees, subscriptions, and Westminster Abbey are profoundly unsatisfactory to me, so frankly, I’d rather avoid them altogether. My daughter and her aunt also send their kind regards to Mrs. Fairbairn, and I hope you will take my best wishes seriously until I am quietly buried without any memorial except what I have set up during my lifetime." A year later, in August 1869, when asked to say something at the inauguration of Leigh Hunt's bust at his grave in Kensal Green, he informed the committee that he had a strong aversion to giving speeches next to graves. "I don't expect or want my feelings on this matter to influence others; still, it's very serious for me, and the thought of ever being the subject of such a ceremony myself is so distasteful that I must decline to participate."
His aversion to every form of what is called patronage of literature[292] was part of the same feeling. A few[488] months earlier a Manchester gentleman[293] wrote for his support to such a scheme. "I beg to be excused," was his reply, "from complying with the request you do me the honour to prefer, simply because I hold the opinion that there is a great deal too much patronage in England. The better the design, the less (as I think) should it seek such adventitious aid, and the more composedly should it rest on its own merits." This was the belief Southey held; it extended to the support by way of patronage given by such societies as the Literary Fund, which Southey also strongly resisted; and it survived the failure of the Guild whereby it was hoped to establish a system of self-help, under which men engaged in literary pursuits might be as proud to receive as to give. Though there was no project of his life into which he flung himself with greater eagerness than the Guild, it was not taken up by the class it was meant to benefit, and every renewed exertion more largely added to the failure. There is no room in these pages for the story, which will add its chapter some day to the vanity of human wishes; but a passage from a letter to Bulwer Lytton at its outset will be some measure of the height from which the writer fell, when all hope for what he had so set his heart upon ceased. "I do devoutly believe that this plan, carried by the support which I trust will be given to it, will change the status of the literary man in England, and make a revolution in his position which no government, no power on earth[489] but his own, could ever effect. I have implicit confidence in the scheme—so splendidly begun—if we carry it out with a stedfast energy. I have a strong conviction that we hold in our hands the peace and honour of men of letters for centuries to come, and that you are destined to be their best and most enduring benefactor. . . . Oh what a procession of new years may walk out of all this for the class we belong to, after we are dust."
His dislike for any form of what is called literary patronage[292] was part of the same sentiment. A few[488] months earlier, a gentleman from Manchester[293] reached out to him for support of such a scheme. "I must decline," was his reply, "to comply with your request, simply because I believe there is far too much patronage in England. The better the initiative, the less it should seek such external support, and the more it should stand on its own merits." This was the belief Southey held; it extended to the patronage offered by organizations like the Literary Fund, which Southey also strongly opposed; and it persisted even after the failure of the Guild, through which it was hoped to create a system of self-help, where those in literary fields could take pride in both giving and receiving support. Although there was no other project he invested himself in with more enthusiasm than the Guild, it was not adopted by the very group it aimed to assist, and every new effort only contributed more to its failure. There isn’t enough space in these pages for that story, which will one day add its chapter to the vanity of human aspirations; however, a quote from a letter to Bulwer Lytton at its beginning provides a sense of the heights from which the writer fell when all hope for what he cherished vanished. "I truly believe that this plan, with the support I hope it will receive, will change the status of literary figures in England and transform their position in a way that no government or power on earth[489] except their own could achieve. I have complete faith in the scheme—so brilliantly initiated—if we follow through with unwavering energy. I firmly believe we hold the future peace and honor of writers for generations to come, and that you are destined to be their greatest and most lasting benefactor. . . . Oh, just think of the new era that may emerge from all of this for our community, once we have become dust."
These views about patronage did not make him more indulgent to the clamour with which it is so often invoked for the ridiculously small. "You read that life of Clare?" he wrote (15th of August 1865). "Did you ever see such preposterous exaggeration of small claims? And isn't it expressive, the perpetual prating of him in the book as the Poet? So another Incompetent used to write to the Literary Fund when I was on the committee: 'This leaves the Poet at his divine mission in a corner of the single room. The Poet's father is wiping his spectacles. The Poet's mother is weaving'—Yah!'" He was equally intolerant of every magnificent proposal that should render the literary man independent of the bookseller, and he sharply criticized even a compromise to replace the half-profits system by one of royalties on copies sold. "What does it come to?" he remarked of an ably-written pamphlet in which this was urged (10th of November 1866): "what is the worth of the remedy after all? You and I know very well that in nine cases out of ten the author is at a disadvantage with the publisher because the publisher has capital and the author has not. We know perfectly well that in nine cases out of ten[490] money is advanced by the publisher before the book is producible—often, long before. No young or unsuccessful author (unless he were an amateur and an independent gentleman) would make a bargain for having that royalty, to-morrow, if he could have a certain sum of money, or an advance of money. The author who could command that bargain, could command it to-morrow, or command anything else. For the less fortunate or the less able, I make bold to say—with some knowledge of the subject, as a writer who made a publisher's fortune long before he began to share in the real profits of his books—that if the publishers met next week, and resolved henceforth to make this royalty bargain and no other, it would be an enormous hardship and misfortune because the authors could not live while they wrote. The pamphlet seems to me just another example of the old philosophical chess-playing, with human beings for pieces. 'Don't want money.' 'Be careful to be born with means, and have a banker's account.' 'Your publisher will settle with you, at such and such long periods according to the custom of his trade, and you will settle with your butcher and baker weekly, in the meantime, by drawing cheques as I do.' 'You must be sure not to want money, and then I have worked it out for you splendidly.'"
These opinions about sponsorship didn’t make him more lenient toward the fuss that it often stirs up for the ridiculously minor. “Did you read that biography of Clare?” he wrote (August 15, 1865). “Have you ever seen such outrageous exaggeration of small claims? And isn’t it telling, the constant chatter of him in the book as the Poet? Just like another incompetent who used to write to the Literary Fund while I was on the committee: ‘This leaves the Poet at his divine mission in a corner of a single room. The Poet's father is cleaning his glasses. The Poet's mother is weaving’—Yah!'” He was just as intolerant of any grand proposal meant to make the writer independent from the bookseller and sharply criticized even a compromise to switch from the half-profits system to royalties on copies sold. “What does it amount to?” he commented on a well-written pamphlet that suggested this (November 10, 1866): “what is the worth of the remedy, after all? You and I know very well that in nine cases out of ten, the author is at a disadvantage with the publisher because the publisher has capital and the author does not. We know perfectly well that in nine cases out of ten[490]money is advanced by the publisher before the book can even be produced—often, long before. No young or unsuccessful author (unless they were an amateur and an independent gentleman) would agree to a royalty tomorrow if they could have a guaranteed sum of money, or an advance. The author who could negotiate that deal could set it up tomorrow, or arrange for anything else. For those less fortunate or less capable, I boldly claim—with some knowledge of the subject, as a writer who made a publisher's fortune long before starting to see the real profits from my books—that if the publishers met next week and decided to only make this royalty agreement going forward, it would be a huge hardship and disaster because authors couldn’t survive while writing. The pamphlet seems like just another example of old philosophical chess-playing, with humans as the pieces. 'Don’t need money.' 'Be sure to be born with wealth, and have a bank account.' 'Your publisher will settle with you at those long intervals according to the custom of their trade, and you will settle with your butcher and baker weekly, in the meantime, by writing checks like I do.' 'You must ensure you don’t need money, and then I’ve got it all figured out for you beautifully.'"
Less has been said in this work than might perhaps have been wished, of the way in which his editorship of Household Words and All the Year Round was discharged. It was distinguished above all by liberality; and a scrupulous consideration and delicacy, evinced by him to all his contributors, was part of the esteem in which he held literature itself. It was said in a[491] newspaper after his death, evidently by one of his contributors, that he always brought the best out of a man by encouragement and appreciation; that he liked his writers to feel unfettered; and that his last reply to a proposition for a series of articles had been: "Whatever you see your way to, I will see mine to, and we know and understand each other well enough to make the best of these conditions." Yet the strong feeling of personal responsibility was always present in his conduct of both journals; and varied as the contents of a number might be, and widely apart the writers, a certain individuality of his own was never absent. He took immense pains (as indeed was his habit about everything) with numbers in which he had written nothing; would often accept a paper from a young or unhandy contributor, because of some single notion in it which he thought it worth rewriting for; and in this way, or by helping generally to give strength and attractiveness to the work of others, he grudged no trouble.[294] "I have had a story" he wrote (22nd of[492] June 1856) "to hack and hew into some form for Household Words this morning, which has taken me four hours of close attention. And I am perfectly addled by its horrible want of continuity after all, and the dreadful spectacle I have made of the proofs—which look like an inky fishing-net." A few lines from another letter will show the difficulties in which he was often involved by the plan he adopted for[493] Christmas numbers, of putting within a framework by himself a number of stories by separate writers to whom the leading notion had before been severally sent. "As yet" (25th of November 1859), "not a story has come to me in the least belonging to the idea (the simplest in the world; which I myself described in writing, in the most elaborate manner); and everyone of them turns, by a strange fatality, on a criminal trial!" It had all to be set right by him, and editorship on such terms was not a sinecure.
Less has been discussed in this work than might have been desired, regarding how he managed his role as editor of Household Words and All the Year Round. His editorship stood out for its openness; his meticulous consideration and respect for all his contributors reflected the high regard he had for literature itself. A newspaper published after his death, likely by one of his contributors, mentioned that he always brought out the best in people through encouragement and appreciation, that he liked his writers to feel free, and that his final response to a proposal for a series of articles was: "Whatever you decide to write, I will support, and we understand each other well enough to make the most of it." Yet, the sense of personal responsibility was always evident in how he handled both journals; regardless of how diverse the content or the writers were, a certain unique touch of his own never faded. He put in significant effort (as he did with everything) into issues where he hadn't contributed anything; often accepting submissions from inexperienced or awkward writers because of a single idea he felt was worth rewriting; and in this way, or by generally helping to enhance the strength and appeal of others' work, he never hesitated to put in the effort. "I have had a story," he wrote (June 22, 1856), "to chop and shape into some form for Household Words this morning, which has taken me four hours of intense focus. And I am completely confused by its terrible lack of continuity after all, and the awful mess I made of the proofs—which look like an inky fishing net." A few lines from another letter will illustrate the challenges he often faced due to the approach he took for the [493] Christmas issues, trying to fit a series of stories from different writers into a framework that he created himself, with the main idea previously communicated to each. "As of yet" (November 25, 1859), "not a single story has come to me that aligns with the concept (the simplest idea in the world, which I described in detail); and oddly enough, every one of them revolves around a criminal trial!" It all had to be corrected by him, and editing under such circumstances was certainly no easy task.
It had its pleasures as well as pains, however, and the greatest was when he fancied he could descry unusual merit in any writer. A letter will give one instance for illustration of many; the lady to whom it was addressed, admired under her assumed name of Holme Lee, having placed it at my disposal. (Folkestone: 14th of August 1855.) "I read your tale with the strongest emotion, and with a very exalted admiration of the great power displayed in it. Both in severity and tenderness I thought it masterly. It moved me more than I can express to you. I wrote to Mr. Wills that it had completely unsettled me for the day, and that by whomsoever it was written, I felt the highest respect for the mind that had produced it. It so happened that I had been for some days at work upon a character externally like the Aunt. And it was very strange to me indeed to observe how the two people seemed to be near to one another at first, and then turned off on their own ways so wide asunder. I told Mr. Wills that I was not sure whether I could have prevailed upon myself to present to a large audience the terrible consideration of hereditary madness,[494] when it was reasonably probable that there must be many—or some—among them whom it would awfully, because personally, address. But I was not obliged to ask myself the question, inasmuch as the length of the story rendered it unavailable for Household Words. I speak of its length in reference to that publication only; relatively to what is told in it, I would not spare a page of your manuscript. Experience shows me that a story in four portions is best suited to the peculiar requirements of such a journal, and I assure you it will be an uncommon satisfaction to me if this correspondence should lead to your enrolment among its contributors. But my strong and sincere conviction of the vigour and pathos of this beautiful tale, is quite apart from, and not to be influenced by, any ulterior results. You had no existence to me when I read it. The actions and sufferings of the characters affected me by their own force and truth, and left a profound impression on me."[295] The experience there mentioned did not prevent him from admitting into his later periodical, All the Year Round, longer serial stories published with the names of known writers; and to his own interference with these he properly placed limits. "When one of my literary brothers does me the honour to undertake such a task, I hold that he executes it on his own personal responsibility, and for the sustainment of his own reputation; and I do not consider myself at liberty to exercise that control over his text which I claim as to other contributions." Nor[495] had he any greater pleasure, even in these cases, than to help younger novelists to popularity. "You asked me about new writers last night. If you will read Kissing the Rod, a book I have read to-day, you will not find it hard to take an interest in the author of such a book." That was Mr. Edmund Yates, in whose literary successes he took the greatest interest himself, and with whom he continued to the last an intimate personal intercourse which had dated from kindness shown at a very trying time. "I think" he wrote of another of his contributors, Mr. Percy Fitzgerald, for whom he had also much personal liking, and of whose powers he thought highly, "you will find Fatal Zero a very curious bit of mental development, deepening as the story goes on into a picture not more startling than true." My mention of these pleasures of editorship shall close with what I think to him was the greatest. He gave to the world, while yet the name of the writer was unknown to him, the pure and pathetic verse of Adelaide Procter. "In the spring of the year 1853 I observed a short poem among the proffered contributions, very different, as I thought, from the shoal of verses perpetually setting through the office of such a periodical."[296] The contributions had been large and frequent under an assumed name, when at Christmas 1854 he discovered that Miss Mary Berwick was the daughter of his old and dear friend Barry Cornwall.
It had its ups and downs, but the best part was when he thought he could see real talent in any writer. A letter provides one example out of many; the woman it was addressed to, who went by the pen name Holme Lee, allowed me to share it. (Folkestone: 14th of August 1855.) "I read your story with intense emotion and a deep admiration for the great skill displayed in it. I found both the harshness and tenderness to be masterful. It moved me more than I can express. I told Mr. Wills that it completely unsettled me for the day, and regardless of who wrote it, I had the utmost respect for the mind that created it. Interestingly, I had been working for a few days on a character who looked much like the Aunt. It was truly strange to me how the two seemed to be so similar at first, but then diverged so widely. I told Mr. Wills I wasn’t sure I could bring myself to present the chilling idea of hereditary madness to a large audience, considering there might be many— or some—who would find it terrifyingly relatable. But I didn’t have to grapple with that issue since the length of the story made it unsuitable for Household Words. I mention its length only in relation to that publication; regarding what’s in it, I wouldn't cut a single page from your manuscript. Experience has shown me that a story broken into four parts fits the unique needs of that journal best, and I would be very pleased if this correspondence leads to your inclusion among its contributors. However, my strong and genuine belief in the strength and emotion of this beautiful tale stands completely apart from any potential outcomes. I had no idea who you were when I read it. The actions and struggles of the characters moved me purely by their own intensity and truth, leaving a lasting impact on me."[295] The experience mentioned didn’t stop him from including longer serialized stories by recognized writers in his later periodical, All the Year Round, and he properly set limits to his involvement with them. "When one of my literary colleagues takes on such a task, I believe it’s done under his own responsibility and for his own reputation; I don’t feel I should control his text as I do with other contributions." Nor[495] did he find any greater satisfaction— even in these cases— than helping younger novelists gain popularity. "You asked me about new writers last night. If you read Kissing the Rod, a book I read today, you’ll find it easy to become interested in the author of such a work." That was Mr. Edmund Yates, whose literary successes he cared about deeply, and he maintained a close personal relationship with him that began when he showed kindness during a very challenging time. "I believe," he wrote about another contributor, Mr. Percy Fitzgerald, for whom he had a lot of personal affection and whose abilities he thought highly of, "you’ll find Fatal Zero to be a very intriguing piece of mental development, becoming more surprising as the story progresses into a portrayal that is no less startling than true." I’ll wrap up my mention of these joys of editing with what I think was the greatest for him. He introduced to the world, without yet knowing the writer's name, the pure and emotional poetry of Adelaide Procter. "In the spring of 1853, I noticed a short poem among the submitted contributions that seemed very different from the flood of verses constantly coming through the office of such a periodical."[296] The contributions had been numerous and frequent under a pseudonym, and it wasn't until Christmas 1854 that he discovered that Miss Mary Berwick was the daughter of his old and dear friend Barry Cornwall.
But periodical writing is not without its drawbacks, and its effect on Dickens, who engaged in it largely[496] from time to time, was observable in the increased impatience of allusion to national institutions and conventional distinctions to be found in his later books. Party divisions he cared for less and less as life moved on; but the decisive, peremptory, dogmatic style, into which a habit of rapid remark on topics of the day will betray the most candid and considerate commentator, displayed its influence, perhaps not always consciously to himself, in the underlying tone of bitterness that runs through the books which followed Copperfield. The resentment against remediable wrongs is as praiseworthy in them as in the earlier tales; but the exposure of Chancery abuses, administrative incompetence, politico-economic shortcomings, and social flunkeyism, in Bleak House, Little Dorrit, Hard Times, and Our Mutual Friend, would not have been made less odious by the cheerier tone that had struck with much sharper effect at prison abuses, parish wrongs, Yorkshire schools, and hypocritical humbug, in Pickwick, Oliver Twist, Nickleby, and Chuzzlewit. It will be remembered of him always that he desired to set right what was wrong, that he held no abuse to be unimprovable, that he left none of the evils named exactly as he found them, and that to influences drawn from his writings were due not a few of the salutary changes which marked the age in which he lived; but anger does not improve satire, and it gave latterly, from the causes named, too aggressive a form to what, after all, was but a very wholesome hatred of the cant that everything English is perfect, and that to call a thing unEnglish is to doom it to abhorred extinction.
But writing for magazines isn't without its downsides, and its impact on Dickens, who was involved in it often[496] over time, was visible in his growing impatience with references to national institutions and conventional distinctions in his later works. He cared less about political divisions as life went on, but the blunt, dogmatic style that comes from habitually commenting on current events influenced him, perhaps not always consciously, creating an underlying tone of bitterness in the books that followed Copperfield. His anger at fixable injustices is as commendable as in his earlier stories; however, the critique of Chancery malpractice, administrative failures, political and economic issues, and social sycophancy in Bleak House, Little Dorrit, Hard Times, and Our Mutual Friend would not have been less unpleasant if it had been delivered with the lighter tone that more effectively addressed issues of prison abuse, parish problems, Yorkshire schools, and hypocritical nonsense in Pickwick, Oliver Twist, Nickleby, and Chuzzlewit. It will always be remembered that he wanted to correct what was wrong, that he believed no abuse couldn't be improved, that he didn’t leave any of the mentioned evils unchanged, and that some of the positive changes of his time were influenced by his writings; but anger doesn’t enhance satire, and, due to the reasons mentioned, it made his later work too confrontational for what was, after all, just a healthy contempt for the idea that everything English is flawless, and that labeling something as unEnglish equates to condemning it to terrible extinction.
"I have got an idea for occasional papers in[497] Household Words called the Member for Nowhere. They will contain an account of his views, votes, and speeches; and I think of starting with his speeches on the Sunday question. He is a member of the Government of course. The moment they found such a member in the House, they felt that he must be dragged (by force, if necessary) into the Cabinet." "I give it up reluctantly," he wrote afterwards, "and with it my hope to have made every man in England feel something of the contempt for the House of Commons that I have. We shall never begin to do anything until the sentiment is universal." That was in August 1854; and the break-down in the Crimea that winter much embittered his radicalism. "I am hourly strengthened in my old belief," he wrote (3rd of February 1855) "that our political aristocracy and our tuft-hunting are the death of England. In all this business I don't see a gleam of hope. As to the popular spirit, it has come to be so entirely separated from the Parliament and Government, and so perfectly apathetic about them both, that I seriously think it a most portentous sign." A couple of months later: "I have rather a bright idea, I think, for Household Words this morning: a fine little bit of satire: an account of an Arabic MS. lately discovered very like the Arabian Nights—called the Thousand and One Humbugs. With new versions of the best known stories." This also had to be given up, and is only mentioned as another illustration of his political discontents and of their connection with his journal-work. The influences from his early life which unconsciously strengthened them in certain social directions[498] has been hinted at, and of his absolute sincerity in the matter there can be no doubt. The mistakes of Dickens were never such as to cast a shade on his integrity. What he said with too much bitterness, in his heart he believed; and had, alas! too much ground for believing. "A country," he wrote (27th of April 1855) "which is discovered to be in this tremendous condition as to its war affairs; with an enormous black cloud of poverty in every town which is spreading and deepening every hour, and not one man in two thousand knowing anything about, or even believing in, its existence; with a non-working aristocracy, and a silent parliament, and everybody for himself and nobody for the rest; this is the prospect, and I think it a very deplorable one." Admirably did he say, of a notorious enquiry at that time: "O what a fine aspect of political economy it is, that the noble professors of the science on the adulteration committee should have tried to make Adulteration a question of Supply and Demand! We shall never get to the Millennium, sir, by the rounds of that ladder; and I, for one, won't hold by the skirts of that Great Mogul of impostors, Master M'Culloch!" Again he wrote (30th of September 1855): "I really am serious in thinking—and I have given as painful consideration to the subject as a man with children to live and suffer after him can honestly give to it—that representative government is become altogether a failure with us, that the English gentilities and subserviences render the people unfit for it, and that the whole thing has broken down since that great seventeenth-century time, and has no hope in it."[499]
"I have an idea for occasional papers in[497] Household Words called the Member for Nowhere. They will include an overview of his views, votes, and speeches, and I'm thinking of starting with his speeches on the Sunday question. He is, of course, a member of the Government. As soon as they found such a member in the House, they felt he must be pushed (by force, if needed) into the Cabinet." "I give it up reluctantly," he wrote later, "and with it my hope of making every man in England feel some of the contempt for the House of Commons that I have. We won’t get anywhere until that sentiment is universal." That was in August 1854; and the breakdown in Crimea that winter deeply soured his radicalism. "I am constantly reinforced in my old belief," he wrote (3rd of February 1855) "that our political aristocracy and our tuft-hunting are ruining England. In all of this, I don’t see any glimmer of hope. As for the public spirit, it has become so completely detached from Parliament and Government, and so utterly indifferent toward both, that I genuinely see it as a very ominous sign." A couple of months later: "I have a pretty good idea this morning for Household Words: a nice little piece of satire—an account of a recently discovered Arabic manuscript that’s very similar to the Arabian Nights—called the Thousand and One Humbugs. With new versions of the best-known stories." This too had to be abandoned, and is only mentioned to illustrate his political frustrations and their connection to his journal work. The influences from his early life that unknowingly guided him in certain social directions[498] have been hinted at, and there's no doubt about his absolute sincerity in this matter. Dickens's mistakes never cast a shadow on his integrity. What he expressed with too much bitterness, he genuinely believed in his heart; and had, unfortunately, too much reason to believe it. "A country," he wrote (27th of April 1855) "that is found to be in this dire state regarding its war efforts; with an enormous dark cloud of poverty hanging over every town that’s spreading and deepening by the hour, and not one person in two thousand being aware of it, or even believing in its existence; with a non-working aristocracy, a silent parliament, and everyone for themselves while no one looks out for the rest; this is the outlook, and I see it as a very distressing one." He aptly remarked, regarding a well-known inquiry at the time: "Oh, what a fine glimpse of political economy it is, that the noble experts of the science on the adulteration committee would try to make Adulteration a matter of Supply and Demand! We will never reach the Millennium, sir, by climbing that ladder; and I, for one, won’t cling to the skirts of that Great Mogul of impostors, Master M'Culloch!" Again he wrote (30th of September 1855): "I am truly serious in thinking—and I have given as much painful consideration to the subject as a man with children to care for after him can honestly give—that representative government has utterly failed us, that the English gentility and subservience make the people unfit for it, and that the whole system has collapsed since that great seventeenth-century period, and shows no promise of recovery."[499]
With the good sense that still overruled all his farthest extremes of opinion he yet never thought of parliament for himself. He could not mend matters, and for him it would have been a false position. The people of the town of Reading and others applied to him during the first half of his life, and in the last half some of the Metropolitan constituencies. To one of the latter a reply is before me in which he says: "I declare that as to all matters on the face of this teeming earth, it appears to me that the House of Commons and Parliament altogether is become just the dreariest failure and nuisance that ever bothered this much-bothered world." To a private enquiry of apparently about the same date he replied: "I have thoroughly satisfied myself, having often had occasion to consider the question, that I can be far more usefully and independently employed in my chosen sphere of action than I could hope to be in the House of Commons; and I believe that no consideration would induce me to become a member of that extraordinary assembly." Finally, upon a reported discussion in Finsbury whether or not he should be invited to sit for that borough, he promptly wrote (November 1861): "It may save some trouble if you will kindly confirm a sensible gentleman who doubted at that meeting whether I was quite the man for Finsbury. I am not at all the sort of man; for I believe nothing would induce me to offer myself as a parliamentary representative of that place, or of any other under the sun." The only direct attempt to join a political agitation was his speech at Drury-lane for administrative reform, and he never repeated it. But every movement for practical social reforms, to[500] obtain more efficient sanitary legislation, to get the best compulsory education practicable for the poor, and to better the condition of labouring people, he assisted earnestly to his last hour; and the readiness with which he took the chair at meetings having such objects in view, the help he gave to important societies working in beneficent ways for themselves or the community, and the power and attractiveness of his oratory, made him one of the forces of the time. His speeches derived singular charm from the buoyancy of his perfect self-possession, and to this he added the advantages of a person and manner which had become as familiar and as popular as his books. The most miscellaneous assemblages listened to him as to a personal friend.
With the good sense that still overrode all his extreme opinions, he never considered parliament for himself. He couldn't fix things, and for him, it would have felt like a false position. Townspeople in Reading and elsewhere approached him during the first half of his life, and in the second half, some in the Metropolitan constituencies did too. To one of the latter, he replied: "I honestly believe that when it comes to everything happening on this crowded earth, the House of Commons and Parliament as a whole have become the most dismal failure and hassle that has ever bothered this troubled world." In response to a private inquiry from around the same time, he said: "I have completely convinced myself, having often thought about it, that I can be far more useful and independently engaged in my chosen field than I could ever hope to be in the House of Commons; and I believe that nothing could convince me to become a member of that remarkable assembly." Finally, after a discussion reported in Finsbury about whether he should be invited to represent that borough, he swiftly wrote (November 1861): "It might save some trouble if you confirm a sensible gentleman who questioned at that meeting whether I was really the right fit for Finsbury. I am definitely not the kind of person for it; I believe nothing would drive me to offer myself as a parliamentary representative for that place, or any other under the sun." The only direct attempt to join a political movement was his speech at Drury Lane for administrative reform, and he never did that again. However, he supported every movement for practical social reforms, including efforts to achieve better sanitary legislation, to provide the best possible compulsory education for the poor, and to improve the conditions of working people, right up until his last hour; the eagerness with which he chaired meetings with these goals, the help he provided to significant organizations working for the well-being of themselves or their community, and the power and charm of his speaking made him one of the influential figures of his time. His speeches were particularly engaging due to his upbeat confidence, complemented by his presence and demeanor, which had become as well-known and beloved as his books. The most diverse audiences listened to him as if he were a personal friend.
Two incidents at the close of his life will show what upon these matters his latest opinions were. At the great Liverpool dinner after his country readings in 1869, over which Lord Dufferin eloquently presided, he replied to a remonstrance from Lord Houghton against his objection to entering public life,[297] that when[501] he took literature for his profession he intended it to be his sole profession; that at that time it did not appear to him to be so well understood in England, as in some other countries, that literature was a dignified profession by which any man might stand or fall; and he resolved that in his person at least it should stand "by itself, of itself, and for itself;" a bargain which "no consideration on earth would now induce him to break." Here however he probably failed to see the entire meaning of Lord Houghton's regret, which would seem to have been meant to say, in more polite form, that to have taken some part in public affairs might have shown him the difficulty in a free state of providing remedies very swiftly for evils of long growth. A half reproach from the same quarter for alleged unkindly sentiments to the House of Lords, he repelled with vehement warmth; insisting on his great regard for individual members, and declaring that there was no man in England he respected more in his public capacity, loved more in his private capacity, or from whom he had received more remarkable proofs of his honour and love of literature, than Lord Russell.[298] In[502] Birmingham shortly after, discoursing on education to the members of the Midland Institute, he told them they should value self-improvement not because it led to fortune but because it was good and right in itself; counselled them in regard to it that Genius was not worth half so much as Attention, or the art of taking an immense deal of pains, which he declared to be, in every study and pursuit, the one sole, safe, certain, remunerative quality; and summed up briefly his political belief.—"My faith in the people governing is, on the whole, infinitesimal; my faith in the People governed is, on the whole, illimitable." This he afterwards (January 1870) explained to mean that he had very little confidence in the people who govern us ("with a small p"), and very great confidence in the People whom they govern ("with a large P"). "My confession being shortly and elliptically stated, was, with no evil intention I am absolutely sure, in some quarters inversely explained." He added that his political opinions had already been not obscurely stated in an "idle book or two"; and he reminded his hearers that he was the inventor "of a certain fiction called the Circumlocution Office, said to be very extravagant, but which I do see rather frequently quoted as if there were grains of truth at the bottom of it." It may nevertheless be suspected, with some confidence, that the construction of his real meaning was not far wrong which assumed it as the condition precedent to his illimitable faith, that the people, even with the big P, should be "governed." It was his constant complaint that, being much in want of government, they had only sham governors; and he had returned from[503] his second American visit, as he came back from his first, indisposed to believe that the political problem had been solved in the land of the free. From the pages of his last book, the bitterness of allusion so frequent in the books just named was absent altogether; and his old unaltered wish to better what was bad in English institutions, carried with it no desire to replace them by new ones.
Two events at the end of his life will show what his final thoughts were on these matters. At the big Liverpool dinner after his country readings in 1869, which Lord Dufferin presided over with great eloquence, he responded to a complaint from Lord Houghton about his refusal to enter public life, stating that when he chose literature as his profession, he intended it to be his only profession. At that time, he felt it wasn’t as well understood in England as in some other countries that literature was a respected profession by which any man could succeed or fail. He decided that, for him at least, it should stand "by itself, of itself, and for itself," a promise that "no amount of persuasion on earth would now make him break." However, he likely missed the full weight of Lord Houghton’s concern, which seemed to suggest, in a more polite way, that participating in public affairs might have made him realize how challenging it is to quickly provide solutions in a free state for long-standing problems. A somewhat reproachful comment from the same source about unkind feelings toward the House of Lords was met with strong indignation from him; he stressed his deep regard for individual members and claimed that no one in England he respected more as a public servant, loved more as a friend, or from whom he had received stronger signs of honor and love of literature than Lord Russell. Shortly after in Birmingham, while discussing education with members of the Midland Institute, he told them to value self-improvement not for the wealth it could bring but because it was morally right; he advised them that Genius was not nearly as valuable as Attention, or the ability to work diligently, which he argued was, in every field and pursuit, the one true, reliable, rewarding trait. He briefly summarized his political beliefs: "My faith in the people who govern is, overall, minimal; my faith in the People they govern is, overall, limitless." He later (January 1870) clarified this to mean that he had very little faith in our leaders ("with a small p") and a lot of faith in the citizens they lead ("with a large P"). "I confidently admit that my statement was, with no ill intent I am absolutely sure, explained in some corners in a contrary manner." He added that his political views had already been expressed, not very unclearly, in an "idle book or two"; and he reminded his audience that he was the creator "of a certain fiction called the Circumlocution Office, said to be very extravagant, but which I do see quoted quite frequently as if there were grains of truth in it." Nevertheless, it may be reasonably suspected that the interpretation of his true meaning, which assumed it was a prerequisite condition for his limitless faith, was that even the People with the big P should be "governed." He often complained that, in great need of governance, they only had sham leaders; and after returning from his second visit to America, just as he did from his first, he was unwilling to believe that the political problem had been resolved in the land of the free. In the pages of his last book, the bitterness that often appeared in the previously mentioned works was completely absent; and his long-standing unchanging desire to improve what was wrong with English institutions came with no wish to replace them with new ones.
In a memoir published shortly after his death there appeared this statement. "For many years past Her Majesty the Queen has taken the liveliest interest in Mr. Dickens's literary labours, and has frequently expressed a desire for an interview with him. . . . This interview took place on the 9th of April, when he received her commands to attend her at Buckingham Palace, and was introduced by his friend Mr. Arthur Helps, the clerk of the Privy Council. . . . Since our author's decease the journal with which he was formerly connected has said: 'The Queen was ready to confer any distinction which Mr. Dickens's known views and tastes would permit him to accept, and after more than one title of honour had been declined, Her Majesty desired that he would, at least, accept a place in her Privy Council.'" As nothing is too absurd[299] for belief,[504] it will not be superfluous to say that Dickens knew of no such desire on her Majesty's part; and though all the probabilities are on the side of his unwillingness to accept any title or place of honour, certainly none was offered to him.
In a memoir published shortly after his death, this statement appeared: "For many years, Her Majesty the Queen has shown great interest in Mr. Dickens's literary work and has often expressed a desire to meet him. This meeting happened on April 9th, when he was summoned to Buckingham Palace and was introduced by his friend Mr. Arthur Helps, the clerk of the Privy Council. Since our author's passing, the journal he was once connected with reported: 'The Queen was willing to bestow any honor that Mr. Dickens’s known beliefs and preferences would allow him to accept, and after he turned down more than one title of honor, Her Majesty wished for him to at least accept a position in her Privy Council.'" As nothing is too ridiculous for belief, it’s worth mentioning that Dickens was unaware of any such desire from her Majesty; and while it’s likely he wouldn’t have wanted to accept any titles or honors, none were actually offered to him.
It had been hoped to obtain her Majesty's name for the Jerrold performances in 1857, but, being a public[505] effort in behalf of an individual, assent would have involved "either perpetual compliance or the giving of perpetual offence." Her Majesty however then sent, through Colonel Phipps, a request to Dickens that he would select a room in the palace, do what he would with it, and let her see the play there. "I said to Col. Phipps thereupon" (21st of June 1857) "that the idea was not quite new to me; that I did not feel easy as to the social position of my daughters, &c. at a Court under those circumstances; and that I would beg her Majesty to excuse me, if any other way of her seeing the play could be devised. To this Phipps said he had not thought of the objection, but had not the slightest doubt I was right. I then proposed that the Queen should come to the Gallery of Illustration a week before the subscription night, and should have the room entirely at her own disposal, and should invite her own company. This, with the good sense that seems to accompany her good nature on all occasions, she resolved within a few hours to do." The effect of the performance was a great gratification. "My gracious sovereign" (5th of July 1857) "was so pleased that she sent round begging me to go and see her and accept her thanks. I replied that I was in my Farce dress, and must beg to be excused. Whereupon she sent again, saying that the dress 'could not be so ridiculous as that,' and repeating the request. I sent my duty in reply, but again hoped her Majesty would have the kindness to excuse my presenting myself in a costume and appearance that were not my own. I was mighty glad to think, when I woke this morning, that I had carried the point."[506]
It was hoped to get the Queen's name for the Jerrold performances in 1857, but since it was a public effort for an individual, agreeing would have meant "either constant approval or causing constant offense." However, the Queen then sent a message through Colonel Phipps asking Dickens to pick a room in the palace, do what he wanted with it, and let her see the play there. "I told Col. Phipps at that time" (June 21, 1857) "that the idea wasn't entirely new to me; that I wasn’t comfortable with the social standing of my daughters, etc. at a Court under those circumstances; and that I would appreciate it if her Majesty could excuse me if we could find another way for her to see the play. To this, Phipps admitted he hadn’t thought of the issue but had no doubt I was right. I then suggested that the Queen visit the Gallery of Illustration a week before the subscription night, have the room completely at her disposal, and invite her own guests. With the common sense that seems to accompany her good nature, she decided within a few hours to do just that." The outcome of the performance was very satisfying. "My gracious sovereign" (July 5, 1857) "was so pleased that she sent a request for me to come see her and accept her thanks. I replied that I was in my Farce costume and would have to decline. She then sent again, saying that my outfit 'couldn’t be as ridiculous as that,' and repeated the request. I sent my respects in reply but still hoped her Majesty would kindly excuse my appearance in a costume and look that wasn't my own. I was really glad to think, when I woke up this morning, that I had managed to make my point."
The opportunity of presenting himself in his own costume did not arrive till the year of his death, another effort meanwhile made having proved also unsuccessful. "I was put into a state of much perplexity on Sunday" (30th of March 1858). "I don't know who had spoken to my informant, but it seems that the Queen is bent upon hearing the Carol read, and has expressed her desire to bring it about without offence; hesitating about the manner of it, in consequence of my having begged to be excused from going to her when she sent for me after the Frozen Deep. I parried the thing as well as I could; but being asked to be prepared with a considerate and obliging answer, as it was known the request would be preferred, I said, 'Well! I supposed Col. Phipps would speak to me about it, and if it were he who did so, I should assure him of my desire to meet any wish of her Majesty's, and should express my hope that she would indulge me by making one of some audience or other—for I thought an audience necessary to the effect.' Thus it stands: but it bothers me." The difficulty was not surmounted, but her Majesty's continued interest in the Carol was shown by her purchase of a copy of it with Dickens's autograph at Thackeray's sale;[300] and at[507] last there came, in the year of his death, the interview with the author whose popularity dated from her accession, whose books had entertained larger numbers of her subjects than those of any other contemporary writer, and whose genius will be counted among the glories of her reign. Accident led to it. Dickens had brought with him from America some large and striking photographs of the Battle Fields of the Civil War, which the Queen, having heard of them through Mr. Helps, expressed a wish to look at. Dickens sent them at once; and went afterwards to Buckingham Palace with Mr. Helps, at her Majesty's request, that she might see and thank him in person.
The chance to present himself in his own attire didn’t come until the year of his death, and another effort in the meantime had also failed. "I was quite confused on Sunday" (March 30, 1858). "I don’t know who spoke to my informant, but it seems the Queen is determined to hear the Carol read and has expressed her desire to do so without causing any offense; she’s unsure about how to go about it since I asked to be excused from meeting her when she called for me after the Frozen Deep. I handled the situation as best as I could, but when I was asked to be ready with a considerate and accommodating answer, knowing the request would be made, I said, 'Well! I figured Col. Phipps would talk to me about it, and if it was him who did so, I’d assure him of my wish to meet any request from Her Majesty and express my hope that she would indulge me by holding some kind of audience or other—because I thought an audience was necessary for the effect.' So that’s how it stands: but it’s bothering me." The difficulty was not resolved, but her Majesty's ongoing interest in the Carol was evident when she purchased a copy with Dickens's autograph at Thackeray's sale;[300] and at[507] last, in the year of his death, there was the meeting with the author whose popularity had begun with her accession, whose books had entertained more of her subjects than any other contemporary writer, and whose genius will be remembered among the glories of her reign. It happened by chance. Dickens had brought some large and impressive photographs of the Civil War battlefields from America, which the Queen, having heard about them from Mr. Helps, expressed a wish to see. Dickens sent them right away and then went to Buckingham Palace with Mr. Helps at Her Majesty's request so she could see and thank him in person.
It was in the middle of March, not April. "Come now sir, this is an interesting matter, do favour us with it," was the cry of Johnson's friends after his conversation with George the Third; and again and again the story was told to listeners ready to make marvels of its commonplaces. But the romance even of the eighteenth century in such a matter is clean gone out of the nineteenth. Suffice it that the Queen's kindness left a strong impression on Dickens. Upon her Majesty's regret not to have heard his Readings, Dickens intimated that they were become now a thing of the past, while he acknowledged gratefully her Majesty's compliment in regard to them. She spoke to him of the impression made upon her by his acting in the Frozen Deep; and on his stating, in reply to her enquiry, that the little play had not been very successful on the public[508] stage, said this did not surprise her, since it no longer had the advantage of his performance in it. Then arose a mention of some alleged discourtesy shown to Prince Arthur in New York, and he begged her Majesty not to confound the true Americans of that city with the Fenian portion of its Irish population; on which she made the quiet comment that she was convinced the people about the Prince had made too much of the affair. He related to her the story of President Lincoln's dream on the night before his murder. She asked him to give her his writings, and could she have them that afternoon? but he begged to be allowed to send a bound copy. Her Majesty then took from a table her own book upon the Highlands, with an autograph inscription "to Charles Dickens"; and, saying that "the humblest" of writers would be ashamed to offer it to "one of the greatest" but that Mr. Helps, being asked to give it, had remarked that it would be valued most from herself, closed the interview by placing it in his hands. "Sir," said Johnson, "they may say what they like of the young King, but Louis the Fourteenth could not have shown a more refined courtliness"; and Dickens was not disposed to say less of the young King's granddaughter. That the grateful impression sufficed to carry him into new ways, I had immediate proof, coupled with intimation of the still surviving strength of old memories. "As my sovereign desires" (26th of March 1870) "that I should attend the next levee, don't faint with amazement if you see my name in that unwonted connexion. I have scrupulously kept myself free for the second of April, in case you should be accessible." The name appeared at the[509] levee accordingly, his daughter was at the drawing-room that followed, and Lady Houghton writes to me "I never saw Mr. Dickens more agreeable than at a dinner at our house about a fortnight before his death, when he met the King of the Belgians and the Prince of Wales at the special desire of the latter." Up to nearly the hour of dinner, it was doubtful if he could go. He was suffering from the distress in his foot; and on arrival at the house, being unable to ascend the stairs, had to be assisted at once into the dining-room.
It was mid-March, not April. "Come on, sir, this is an interesting matter, please share it with us," was the reaction of Johnson's friends after his chat with George the Third; and the story was told over and over to listeners eager to find wonders in its ordinary details. But the romance of the eighteenth century in such matters had completely faded by the nineteenth. It’s enough to say that the Queen's kindness left a strong impression on Dickens. When her Majesty expressed regret for not having attended his Readings, Dickens mentioned that those performances were now a thing of the past, while he gratefully acknowledged her compliment about them. She told him how his acting in the Frozen Deep had impacted her, and when he replied to her inquiry that the little play hadn’t been very successful on stage, she said it didn’t surprise her since it no longer had the benefit of his performance in it. Then they discussed some supposed rudeness shown to Prince Arthur in New York, and he asked her not to confuse true Americans from that city with the Fenian part of its Irish population; to which she mildly commented that she was sure the people around the Prince had made too much of the situation. He shared with her the story of President Lincoln's dream the night before his assassination. She requested his writings and asked if she could have them that afternoon, but he asked to be allowed to send a bound copy instead. Her Majesty then picked up her own book about the Highlands from a table, with an autograph inscription saying "to Charles Dickens"; and, stating that "the humblest" of writers would feel embarrassed giving it to "one of the greatest," but that Mr. Helps had noted it would be most valued coming from her, she concluded the meeting by handing it to him. "Sir," Johnson said, "they can say what they want about the young King, but Louis the Fourteenth couldn't have displayed more refined courtesy"; and Dickens was equally impressed with the young King's granddaughter. The grateful impression was enough to lead him into new ventures, something I soon confirmed, along with indications of the lingering strength of old memories. "As my sovereign wishes" (March 26, 1870) "that I attend the next levee, don’t faint in shock if you see my name in that unusual context. I've made sure to keep myself free for April 2, in case you are available." His name showed up at the[509] levee, his daughter was present at the drawing-room that followed, and Lady Houghton wrote to me, "I never saw Mr. Dickens more agreeable than at a dinner at our house about two weeks before his death, when he met the King of the Belgians and the Prince of Wales at the special request of the latter." Up until nearly dinner time, it was uncertain whether he could attend. He was struggling with pain in his foot; and upon arriving at the house, unable to climb the stairs, he needed assistance to get into the dining room right away.
The friend who had accompanied Dickens to Buckingham Palace, writing of him[301] after his death, briefly but with admirable knowledge and taste, said that he ardently desired, and confidently looked forward to, a time when there would be a more intimate union than exists at present between the different classes in the state, a union that should embrace alike the highest and the lowest. This perhaps expresses, as well as a few words could, what certainly was always at his heart; and he might have come to think it, when his life was closing, more possible of realisation some day than he ever thought it before. The hope of it was on his friend Talfourd's lips when he died, and his own most jarring opinions might at last have joined in the effort to bring about such reconcilement. More on this head it needs not to say. Whatever may be the objection to special views held by him, he would, wanting even the most objectionable, have been less himself. It was by something of the despot seldom separable from[510] genius, joined to a truthfulness of nature belonging to the highest characters, that men themselves of a rare faculty were attracted to find in Dickens what Sir Arthur Helps has described, "a man to confide in, and look up to as a leader, in the midst of any great peril."
The friend who went with Dickens to Buckingham Palace, writing about him[301] after he passed away, expressed that he passionately wanted and looked forward to a time when there would be a closer bond between the different social classes in society, one that included both the highest and the lowest. This sentiment probably captures, in just a few words, what was always at the core of his beliefs; he might have come to see it, as his life was ending, as more achievable than he had ever imagined before. His friend Talfourd spoke of this hope just before he died, and even his most controversial opinions might have eventually contributed to efforts to create such unity. There’s no need to elaborate further on this. Regardless of any objections to his specific views, he would have been less of himself without even the most criticized of those beliefs. It was a bit of the sometimes-tyrannical nature that often accompanies genius, combined with a genuine honesty that is characteristic of the greatest individuals, that drew other exceptionally talented people to see in Dickens what Sir Arthur Helps described as "a man to trust and look up to as a leader, in times of great danger."
Mr. Layard also held that opinion of him. He was at Gadshill during the Christmas before Dickens went for the last time to America, and witnessed one of those scenes, not infrequent there, in which the master of the house was pre-eminently at home. They took generally the form of cricket matches; but this was, to use the phrase of his friend Bobadil, more popular and diffused; and of course he rose with the occasion. "The more you want of the master, the more you'll find in him," said the gasman employed about his readings. "Foot-races for the villagers," he wrote on Christmas Day, "come off in my field to-morrow. We have been all hard at work all day, building a course, making countless flags, and I don't know what else. Layard is chief commissioner of the domestic police. The country police predict an immense crowd." There were between two and three thousand people; and somehow, by a magical kind of influence, said Layard, Dickens seemed to have bound every creature present, upon what honour the creature had, to keep order. What was the special means used, or the art employed, it might have been difficult to say; but that was the result. Writing on New Year's Day, Dickens himself described it to me. "We had made a very pretty course, and taken great pains. Encouraged by the cricket matches experience, I allowed the landlord of[511] the Falstaff to have a drinking-booth on the ground. Not to seem to dictate or distrust, I gave all the prizes (about ten pounds in the aggregate) in money. The great mass of the crowd were labouring men of all kinds, soldiers, sailors, and navvies. They did not, between half-past ten, when we began, and sunset, displace a rope or a stake; and they left every barrier and flag as neat as they found it. There was not a dispute, and there was no drunkenness whatever. I made them a little speech from the lawn, at the end of the games, saying that please God we would do it again next year. They cheered most lustily and dispersed. The road between this and Chatham was like a Fair all day; and surely it is a fine thing to get such perfect behaviour out of a reckless seaport town. Among other oddities we had a Hurdle Race for Strangers. One man (he came in second) ran 120 yards and leaped over ten hurdles, in twenty seconds, with a pipe in his mouth, and smoking it all the time. 'If it hadn't been for your pipe,' I said to him at the winning-post, 'you would have been first.' 'I beg your pardon, sir,' he answered, 'but if it hadn't been for my pipe, I should have been nowhere.'" The close of the letter had this rather memorable announcement. "The sale of the Christmas number was, yesterday evening, 255,380." Would it be absurd to say that there is something in such a vast popularity in itself electrical, and, though founded on books, felt where books never reach?
Mr. Layard had the same opinion of him. He was at Gadshill during the Christmas before Dickens went to America for the last time and saw one of those familiar scenes there, where the host was truly in his element. They usually took the form of cricket matches; but this was, in the words of his friend Bobadil, more popular and spread out; and of course, he rose to the occasion. "The more you need from the master, the more you’ll find in him," said the gasman who worked at his readings. "Foot-races for the villagers," he wrote on Christmas Day, "are happening in my field tomorrow. We’ve been busy all day building a course, making a ton of flags, and I don’t know what else. Layard is the head of the domestic police. The local police expect a huge crowd." There were between two and three thousand people; and somehow, through a magical influence, Layard said Dickens seemed to have somehow gotten every single person there, for whatever honor they had, to keep things in order. It might have been hard to pinpoint the exact method or skill used, but that was the outcome. Writing on New Year's Day, Dickens himself described it to me. "We had set up a really nice course and put in a lot of effort. Encouraged by the experience of the cricket matches, I allowed the landlord of [511] the Falstaff to have a drinking booth on the grounds. Not wanting to seem authoritative or distrustful, I distributed all the prizes (totaling about ten pounds) in cash. The majority of the crowd were working-class men of all sorts, soldiers, sailors, and laborers. Between half-past ten when we started and sunset, they didn’t move a rope or a stake; they left every barrier and flag just as neat as they found it. There wasn’t a single argument, and there was no drunkenness at all. I made a little speech from the lawn at the end of the games, saying that God willing, we would do it again next year. They cheered loudly and dispersed. The road between here and Chatham was like a fair all day; and it’s certainly impressive to see such good behavior from a rough seaport town. Among other odd events, we had a Hurdle Race for Strangers. One man (he came in second) ran 120 yards and leaped over ten hurdles in twenty seconds, with a pipe in his mouth, and smoked it the whole time. 'If it hadn’t been for your pipe,' I said to him at the finish line, 'you would have come in first.' 'I’m sorry, sir,' he replied, 'but if it hadn’t been for my pipe, I wouldn’t have been anywhere.'" The end of the letter had this rather notable announcement. "Yesterday evening, the sale of the Christmas number was 255,380." Would it be ridiculous to say there is something about such overwhelming popularity that feels electric, and, though based on books, is sensed where books never reach?
It is also very noticeable that what would have constituted the strength of Dickens if he had entered public life, the attractive as well as the commanding side of his nature, was that which kept him most within the[512] circle of home pursuits and enjoyments. This "better part" of him had now long survived that sorrowful period of 1857-8, when, for reasons which I have not thought myself free to suppress, a vaguely disturbed feeling for the time took possession of him, and occurrences led to his adoption of other pursuits than those to which till then he had given himself exclusively. It was a sad interval in his life; but, though changes incident to the new occupation then taken up remained, and with them many adverse influences which brought his life prematurely to a close, it was, with any reference to that feeling, an interval only; and the dominant impression of the later years, as of the earlier, takes the marvellously domestic home-loving shape in which also the strength of his genius is found. It will not do to draw round any part of such a man too hard a line, and the writer must not be charged with inconsistency who says that Dickens's childish sufferings,[302] and the sense they burnt into him of the misery of loneliness[513] and a craving for joys of home, though they led to what was weakest in him, led also to what was greatest. It was his defect as well as his merit in maturer life not to be able to live alone. When the fancies of his novels were upon him and he was under their restless influence, though he often talked of shutting himself up in out of the way solitary places, he never went anywhere unaccompanied by members of his family. His habits of daily life he carried with him wherever he went. In Albaro and Genoa, at Lausanne and Geneva, in Paris and Boulogne, his ways were as entirely those of home as in London and Broadstairs. If it is the property of a domestic nature to be personally interested in every detail, the smallest as the greatest, of the four walls within which one lives, then no man had it so essentially as Dickens. No man was so inclined naturally to derive his happiness from home concerns. Even the kind of interest in a house which is commonly confined to women, he was full of. Not to speak of changes of importance, there was not an additional hook put up wherever he inhabited, without his knowledge, or otherwise than as part of some small ingenuity of his own. Nothing was too minute for his personal superintendence. Whatever might be in hand, theatricals for the little children, entertainments for those of larger growth, cricket matches, dinners, field sports, from the first new year's eve dance in Doughty Street to the last musical party in Hyde Park Place, he was the centre and soul of it. He did not care to take measure of its greater or less importance. It was enough that a thing was to do, to be worth his while to do it as if there was nothing else to be done in the[514] world. The cry of Laud and Wentworth was his, alike in small and great things; and to no man was more applicable the German "Echt," which expresses reality as well as thoroughness. The usual result followed, in all his homes, of an absolute reliance on him for everything. Under every difficulty, and in every emergency, his was the encouraging influence, the bright and ready help. In illness, whether of the children or any of the servants, he was better than a doctor. He was so full of resource, for which every one eagerly turned to him, that his mere presence in the sick-room was a healing influence, as if nothing could fail if he were only there. So that at last, when, all through the awful night which preceded his departure, he lay senseless in the room where he had fallen, the stricken and bewildered ones who tended him found it impossible to believe that what they saw before them alone was left, or to shut out wholly the strange wild hope that he might again be suddenly among them like himself, and revive what they could not connect, even then, with death's despairing helplessness.
It's also very clear that the qualities that would have made Dickens strong in public life—his appealing and commanding nature—were also what kept him deeply rooted in his home life and pleasures. This "better part" of him had long outlived the difficult period of 1857-8, when, for reasons I won't hide, a vague sense of disturbance took over him, leading him to pursue interests outside of those he had focused on until then. It was a sad time in his life, but even though the changes that came with this new path lingered, bringing many challenges that cut his life short, it was essentially just a phase regarding that feeling. The dominant impression of his later years, just like the earlier ones, took on the wonderfully domestic shape where the strength of his genius resided. You can't clearly define any part of such a person, and the writer can't be accused of inconsistency in saying that Dickens’s childhood struggles, which instilled in him a profound sense of loneliness and a longing for home joys, brought out both his weaknesses and his strengths. It was both a flaw and a virtue in his later life that he couldn't be alone. When his novel ideas overwhelmed him and he was under their restless pull, he often mentioned wanting to isolate himself in remote places, but he never went anywhere without family members. His daily habits followed him wherever he went. In Albaro and Genoa, in Lausanne and Geneva, in Paris and Boulogne, his life was as much like home as in London and Broadstairs. If a domestic nature is about being personally invested in every detail, large or small, of one’s living space, then no one embodied this more than Dickens. No one was as naturally inclined to find happiness in home-related matters. He even had a level of interest in the upkeep of a house usually associated with women. Without even mentioning major changes, he was aware of every new hook added to a wall wherever he lived, and these additions were often part of some small creativity of his own. Nothing was too trivial for his personal involvement. Whatever was happening—be it plays for the little kids, parties for the older ones, cricket matches, or field sports—he was the heart and soul of it, from the very first New Year’s Eve dance in Doughty Street to the last musical gathering in Hyde Park Place. He didn’t measure the importance of an event; it was enough that something was going on for it to be worth his time as if nothing else mattered in the world. His was the call of Laud and Wentworth, applicable to both small and large matters, and the German term "Echt," which signifies both reality and thoroughness, suited him perfectly. The usual result in all his homes was that everyone relied on him completely for everything. In any difficulty or emergency, he had the uplifting presence and quick support needed. When kids or servants were ill, he was better than a doctor. His resourcefulness was so exceptional, and everyone turned to him for it, that just his presence in a sick room had a healing effect, as if nothing could go wrong as long as he was there. So, when he lay unconscious in the room where he collapsed, during the dreadful night before his passing, the shocked and confused people caring for him couldn't truly believe that what they saw was all that remained, nor could they fully extinguish their strange yet wild hope that he might suddenly return to them, to revive what they couldn't yet link to the despair of death.
It was not a feeling confined to the relatives whom he had thus taught to have such exclusive dependence on him. Among the consolations addressed to those mourners came words from one whom in life he had most honoured, and who also found it difficult to connect him with death, or to think that he should never see that blithe face anymore. "It is almost thirty years," Mr. Carlyle wrote, "since my acquaintance with him began; and on my side, I may say, every new meeting ripened it into more and more clear discernment[515] of his rare and great worth as a brother man: a most cordial, sincere, clear-sighted, quietly decisive, just and loving man: till at length he had grown to such a recognition with me as I have rarely had for any man of my time. This I can tell you three, for it is true and will be welcome to you: to others less concerned I had as soon not speak on such a subject." "I am profoundly sorry, for you," Mr. Carlyle at the same time wrote to me; "and indeed for myself and for us all. It is an event world-wide; a unique of talents suddenly extinct; and has 'eclipsed,' we too may say, 'the harmless gaiety of nations.' No death since 1866 has fallen on me with such a stroke. No literary man's hitherto ever did. The good, the gentle, high-gifted, ever-friendly, noble Dickens,—every inch of him an Honest Man."
It wasn’t just the family members he had taught to rely on him so fully who felt this way. Among the messages of comfort sent to those grieving were words from someone he had respected the most in life, who also struggled to connect him with death, or to accept that he would never see that cheerful face again. "It’s been almost thirty years," Mr. Carlyle wrote, "since I first met him; and for my part, I can say, every new encounter deepened my understanding of his rare and significant value as a fellow human: a genuinely warm, sincere, perceptive, decisively quiet, fair, and loving person: until eventually, my recognition of him became something I have rarely experienced with any other man of my time. I can share this with you three; it's true and I hope it brings you comfort: to others less affected, I would rather not discuss such matters." "I am deeply sorry, for you," Mr. Carlyle also wrote to me; "and truly for myself and for all of us. This is a worldwide loss; a major talent has suddenly vanished; and it has 'eclipsed,' we might say, 'the innocent joy of nations.' No death since 1866 has impacted me like this. None from any author ever has. The good, gentle, highly gifted, ever-friendly, noble Dickens—every bit an Honest Man."
Of his ordinary habits of activity I have spoken, and they were doubtless carried too far. In youth it was all well, but he did not make allowance for years. This has had abundant illustration, but will admit of a few words more. To all men who do much, rule and order are essential; method in everything was Dickens's peculiarity; and between breakfast and luncheon, with rare exceptions, was his time of work. But his daily walks were less of rule than of enjoyment and necessity. In the midst of his writing they were indispensable, and especially, as it has often been shown, at night. Mr. Sala is an authority on London streets, and, in the eloquent and generous tribute he was among the first to offer to his memory, has described himself encountering Dickens in the oddest places and most inclement weather, in Ratcliffe-highway, on Haverstock-hill, on[516] Camberwell-green, in Gray's-inn-lane, in the Wandsworth-road, at Hammersmith Broadway, in Norton Folgate, and at Kensal New Town. "A hansom whirled you by the Bell and Horns at Brompton, and there he was striding, as with seven-league boots, seemingly in the direction of North-end, Fulham. The Metropolitan Railway sent you forth at Lisson-grove, and you met him plodding speedily towards the Yorkshire Stingo. He was to be met rapidly skirting the grim brick wall of the prison in Coldbath-fields, or trudging along the Seven Sisters-road at Holloway, or bearing, under a steady press of sail, underneath Highgate Archway, or pursuing the even tenor of his way up the Vauxhall-bridge-road." But he was equally at home in the intricate byways of narrow streets and in the lengthy thoroughfares. Wherever there was "matter to be heard and learned," in back streets behind Holborn, in Borough courts and passages, in city wharfs or alleys, about the poorer lodging-houses, in prisons, workhouses, ragged-schools, police-courts, rag-shops, chandlers' shops, and all sorts of markets for the poor, he carried his keen observation and untiring study. "I was among the Italian Boys from 12 to 2 this morning," says one of his letters. "I am going out to-night in their boat with the Thames Police," says another. It was the same when he was in Italy or Switzerland, as we have seen; and when, in later life, he was in French provincial places. "I walk miles away into the country, and you can scarcely imagine by what deserted ramparts and silent little cathedral closes, or how I pass over rusty drawbridges and stagnant ditches out of and into the decaying town." For several consecutive years I[517] accompanied him every Christmas Eve to see the marketings for Christmas down the road from Aldgate to Bow; and he had a surprising fondness for wandering about in poor neighbourhoods on Christmas-day, past the areas of shabby genteel houses in Somers or Kentish Towns, and watching the dinners preparing or coming in. But the temptations of his country life led him on to excesses in walking. "Coming in just now," he wrote in his third year at Gadshill, "after twelve miles in the rain, I was so wet that I have had to change and get my feet into warm water before I could do anything." Again, two years later: "A south-easter blowing, enough to cut one's throat. I am keeping the house for my cold, as I did yesterday. But the remedy is so new to me, that I doubt if it does me half the good of a dozen miles in the snow. So, if this mode of treatment fails to-day, I shall try that to-morrow." He tried it perhaps too often. In the winter of 1865 he first had the attack in his left foot which materially disabled his walking-power for the rest of his life. He supposed its cause to be overwalking in the snow, and that this had aggravated the suffering is very likely; but, read by the light of what followed, it may now be presumed to have had more serious origin. It recurred at intervals, before America, without any such provocation; in America it came back, not when he had most been walking in the snow, but when nervous exhaustion was at its worst with him; after America, it became prominent on the eve of the occurrence at Preston which first revealed the progress that disease had been making in the vessels of the brain; and in the last year of his life, as will immediately be[518] seen, it was a constant trouble and most intense suffering, extending then gravely to his left hand also, which had before been only slightly affected.
I've talked about his usual habits of activity, and they definitely went a bit overboard. When he was young, it was all fine, but he didn't take his age into account. There's plenty of evidence for this, but I’ll add a few more words. For anyone who does a lot, structure and organization are crucial; having a method for everything was Dickens’s trademark. He usually worked between breakfast and lunch, with few exceptions. However, his daily walks were more about enjoyment and necessity than routine. In the middle of his writing, they were essential, especially, as has often been noted, at night. Mr. Sala, who knows London streets well, offered an eloquent and generous tribute to Dickens’s memory and described encountering him in the most unusual places and harsh weather, like Ratcliffe Highway, Haverstock Hill, Camberwell Green, Gray’s Inn Lane, Wandsworth Road, Hammersmith Broadway, Norton Folgate, and Kensal New Town. “A hansom cab whipped past the Bell and Horns at Brompton, and there he was striding by, as if in seven-league boots, seemingly heading toward North End, Fulham. The Metropolitan Railway dropped you off at Lisson Grove, and you’d see him walking quickly toward Yorkshire Stingo. He could be spotted moving swiftly by the grim brick wall of the prison in Coldbath Fields, trudging along the Seven Sisters Road at Holloway, or maneuvering under Highgate Archway, or maintaining his steady pace up Vauxhall Bridge Road.” But he was equally comfortable in the complex backroads of narrow streets and in the long main roads. Wherever there was “something to hear and learn”—in the back streets behind Holborn, in Borough courts and alleys, in city docks or narrow passages, near the run-down boarding houses, in prisons, workhouses, ragged schools, police courts, junk shops, grocery stores, and various markets for the less fortunate—he brought his sharp observation and tireless study. “I was with the Italian Boys from 12 to 2 this morning,” he noted in one of his letters. “I’m going out tonight in their boat with the Thames Police,” he said in another. It was the same when he was in Italy or Switzerland, as we've seen; and later in life, when he was in provincial France. “I walk miles out into the countryside, and you can hardly imagine the deserted fortifications and quiet little cathedral closes I pass, or how I go over rusty drawbridges and stagnant ditches out of and into the decaying town.” For several consecutive years, I spent every Christmas Eve with him watching the Christmas markets along the road from Aldgate to Bow; and he had a surprising love for wandering through poor neighborhoods on Christmas Day, past areas of rundown houses in Somers or Kentish Town, and observing the dinners being prepared or delivered. But the temptations of his rural life pushed him into excessive walking. “I just came in after twelve miles in the rain; I was so soaked that I had to change and put my feet in warm water before I could do anything,” he wrote in his third year at Gadshill. Again, two years later: “There’s a strong southeast wind blowing that feels like it could cut one’s throat. I’m staying home for my cold, like I did yesterday. But this remedy is so new to me that I doubt it helps me half as much as walking a dozen miles in the snow would. So, if this treatment doesn’t work today, I’ll try that tomorrow.” He probably tried it too often. In the winter of 1865, he had his first attack in his left foot that significantly impaired his ability to walk for the rest of his life. He thought it was caused by too much walking in the snow, and while that likely aggravated the pain, looking back at what happened later, it might have had a more serious cause. It recurred periodically before he went to America, without any such provocation; in America, it returned not when he had walked the most in the snow, but when his nervous exhaustion was at its peak. After America, it became prominent just before the incident in Preston, which first revealed the progress of the disease affecting the blood vessels in his brain; and in the final year of his life, as will soon be shown, it became a constant source of trouble and intense suffering, then seriously affecting his left hand as well, which had only been slightly impacted before.
It was from a letter of the 21st of February 1865 I first learnt that he was suffering tortures from a "frost-bitten" foot, and ten days later brought more detailed account. "I got frost-bitten by walking continually in the snow, and getting wet in the feet daily. My boots hardened and softened, hardened and softened, my left foot swelled, and I still forced the boot on; sat in it to write, half the day; walked in it through the snow, the other half; forced the boot on again next morning; sat and walked again; and being accustomed to all sorts of changes in my feet, took no heed. At length, going out as usual, I fell lame on the walk, and had to limp home dead lame, through the snow, for the last three miles—to the remarkable terror, by-the-bye, of the two big dogs." The dogs were Turk and Linda. Boisterous companions as they always were, the sudden change in him brought them to a stand-still; and for the rest of the journey they crept by the side of their master as slowly as he did, never turning from him. He was greatly moved by the circumstance, and often referred to it. Turk's look upward to his face was one of sympathy as well as fear, he said; but Linda was wholly struck down.
It was from a letter dated February 21, 1865, that I first learned he was enduring pain from a "frostbitten" foot, and ten days later, I received a more detailed account. "I got frostbite from walking constantly in the snow and getting my feet wet every day. My boots kept hardening and softening, and my left foot swelled, yet I kept squeezing it into the boot; I sat in it to write for half the day and walked in it through the snow the other half; I forced the boot on again the next morning; sat and walked again; and since I was used to all sorts of changes in my feet, I didn’t pay much attention. Eventually, going out as usual, I fell lame during my walk and had to hobble home totally lame, through the snow, for the last three miles—much to the evident distress, by the way, of the two big dogs." The dogs were Turk and Linda. Always boisterous companions, the sudden change in him caused them to come to a halt; for the rest of the journey, they moved alongside their master as slowly as he did, never leaving his side. He was deeply affected by this and often mentioned it. He said Turk's look up at his face was one of sympathy as well as fear, but Linda was completely shattered.
The saying in his letter to his youngest son that he was to do to others what he would that they should do to him, without being discouraged if they did not do it; and his saying to the Birmingham people that they were to attend to self-improvement not because it led to fortune, but because it was right; express a principle[519] that at all times guided himself. Capable of strong attachments, he was not what is called an effusive man; but he had no half-heartedness in any of his likings. The one thing entirely hateful to him, was indifference. "I give my heart to very few people; but I would sooner love the most implacable man in the world than a careless one, who, if my place were empty to-morrow, would rub on and never miss me." There was nothing he more repeatedly told his children than that they were not to let indifference in others appear to justify it in themselves. "All kind things," he wrote, "must be done on their own account, and for their own sake, and without the least reference to any gratitude." Again he laid it down, while he was making some exertion for the sake of a dead friend that did not seem likely to win proper appreciation from those it was to serve. "As to gratitude from the family—as I have often remarked to you, one does a generous thing because it is right and pleasant, and not for any response it is to awaken in others." The rule in another form frequently appears in his letters; and it was enforced in many ways upon all who were dear to him. It is worth while to add his comment on a regret of a member of his family at an act of self-devotion supposed to have been thrown away: "Nothing of what is nobly done can ever be lost." It is also to be noted as in the same spirit, that it was not the loud but the silent heroisms he most admired. Of Sir John Richardson, one of the few who have lived in our days entitled to the name of a hero, he wrote from Paris in 1856. "Lady Franklin sent me the whole of that Richardson memoir; and I think Richardson's manly friendship, and love[520] of Franklin, one of the noblest things I ever knew in my life. It makes one's heart beat high, with a sort of sacred joy." (It is the feeling as strongly awakened by the earlier exploits of the same gallant man to be found at the end of Franklin's first voyage, and never to be read without the most exalted emotion.) It was for something higher than mere literature he valued the most original writer and powerful teacher of the age. "I would go at all times farther to see Carlyle than any man alive."
In his letter to his youngest son, he said that one should treat others how they would like to be treated, even if others don’t reciprocate; and to the people in Birmingham, he advised that they should focus on self-improvement not for the sake of wealth, but because it’s the right thing to do. This principle guided him throughout his life. Although capable of deep attachments, he wasn’t what you’d call an overly expressive person; but he was always genuine in his affections. The only thing he truly despised was indifference. "I give my heart to very few people, but I’d rather love the most unforgiving person in the world than someone who is careless and wouldn’t even notice if I were gone tomorrow." He often reminded his children not to let others’ indifference justify it in themselves. "All kind acts," he wrote, "should be done for their own sake, and without expecting any gratitude in return." He reiterated this when he was making an effort for a deceased friend, which was unlikely to be appreciated by those it was meant to help. "As for gratitude from the family—as I’ve often told you, we do generous things because they are right and fulfilling, not for any response we hope to get from others." This rule often appeared in his letters and was emphasized in various ways to those he cared about. It's also noteworthy to add his response to a family member regretting a selfless act that seemed wasted: "Nothing noble that is done can ever be lost." It’s important to mention that what he admired most were not the loud acts of heroism, but the silent ones. About Sir John Richardson, one of the few people in our time deserving of the title hero, he wrote from Paris in 1856: "Lady Franklin sent me the complete Richardson memoir; and I think Richardson's strong friendship and love for Franklin is one of the noblest things I’ve ever known. It fills my heart with a kind of sacred joy." (This feeling was equally stirred by the earlier feats of the same brave man mentioned at the end of Franklin's first voyage, which always evokes the deepest emotion.) He valued the most original writer and powerful teacher of the age for something more than just literature. "I would travel anywhere to see Carlyle more than any other person alive."
Of his attractive points in society and conversation I have particularized little, because in truth they were himself. Such as they were, they were never absent from him. His acute sense of enjoyment gave such relish to his social qualities that probably no man, not a great wit or a professed talker, ever left, in leaving any social gathering, a blank so impossible to fill up. In quick and varied sympathy, in ready adaptation to every whim or humour, in help to any mirth or game, he stood for a dozen men. If one may say such a thing, he seemed to be always the more himself for being somebody else, for continually putting off his personality. His versatility made him unique. What he said once of his own love of acting, applied to him equally when at his happiest among friends he loved; sketching a character, telling a story, acting a charade, taking part in a game; turning into comedy an incident of the day, describing the last good or bad thing he had seen, reproducing in quaint, tragical, or humorous form and figure, some part of the passionate life with which all his being overflowed. "Assumption has charms for me so delightful—I hardly know for[521] how many wild reasons—that I feel a loss of Oh I can't say what exquisite foolery, when I lose a chance of being some one not in the remotest degree like myself." How it was, that, from one of such boundless resource in contributing to the pleasure of his friends, there was yet, as I have said, so comparatively little to bring away, may be thus explained. But it has been also seen that no one at times said better things, and to happy examples formerly given I will add one or two of a kind he more rarely indulged. "He is below par on the Exchange," a friend remarked of a notorious puffing actor; "he doesn't stand well at Lloyds." "Yet no one stands so well with the under-writers," said Dickens; a pun that Swift would have envied. "I call him an Incubus!" said a non-literary friend, at a loss to express the boredom inflicted on him by a popular author. "Pen-and-ink-ubus, you mean," interposed Dickens. So, when Stanfield said of his mid-shipman son, then absent on his first cruise, "the boy has got his sea-legs on by this time!" "I don't know," remarked Dickens, "about his getting his sea-legs on; but if I may judge from his writing, he certainly has not got his A B C legs on."
Of his attractive traits in social settings and conversation, I haven't mentioned much because, honestly, they were just him. Whatever those traits were, they were always a part of him. His keen sense of enjoyment added so much flavor to his social skills that probably no one, except for a witty person or a professional conversationalist, ever left any gathering leaving such an impossible gap to fill. In his quick and varied empathy, his ability to adapt to every mood or whim, and his support in any fun or game, he was worth a dozen people. If I can say this, he seemed to be even more himself when he was playing someone else, constantly shedding his own personality. His talent for versatility made him one of a kind. What he once said about his love for acting applied to him equally when he was happiest among friends he cherished; sketching a character, telling a story, acting out a charade, joining a game; turning an everyday event into comedy, describing the last great or dreadful thing he had seen, reimagining in quirky, tragic, or humorous ways some part of the intense life that filled him. "Pretending has charms for me so delightful—I can't even say how many crazy reasons—that I feel a loss of, oh I can't describe what exquisite silliness, when I miss a chance to be someone who isn’t at all like myself." How it was that, from someone with such limitless resources for bringing joy to his friends, there was still, as I mentioned, so comparatively little to take away, can be explained this way. But it has also been noted that no one could sometimes say better things, and to the happy examples I've shared before, I’ll add a couple that he indulged in less often. "He is below par on the Exchange," a friend remarked about a well-known puffing actor; "he doesn't stand well at Lloyds." "Yet no one stands better with the underwriters," replied Dickens; a pun that Swift would have envied. "I call him an Incubus!" said a non-literary friend, struggling to express the boredom inflicted on him by a popular author. "Pen-and-ink-ubus, you mean," interjected Dickens. So, when Stanfield said of his son, a midshipman currently on his first cruise, "the boy has got his sea-legs on by this time!" Dickens remarked, "I don't know about his getting his sea-legs on; but if I can judge by his writing, he certainly hasn't got his A B C legs on."
Other agreeable pleasantries might be largely cited from his letters. "An old priest" (he wrote from France in 1862), "the express image of Frederic Lemaitre got up for the part, and very cross with the toothache, told me in a railway carriage the other day, that we had no antiquities in heretical England. 'None at all?' I said. 'You have some ships however.' 'Yes; a few.' 'Are they strong?' 'Well,' said I, 'your trade is spiritual, my father: ask the ghost of[522] Nelson.' A French captain who was in the carriage, was immensely delighted with this small joke. I met him at Calais yesterday going somewhere with a detachment; and he said—Pardon! But he had been so limited as to suppose an Englishman incapable of that bonhommie!" In humouring a joke he was excellent, both in letters and talk; and for this kind of enjoyment his least important little notes are often worth preserving. Take one small instance. So freely had he admired a tale told by his friend and solicitor Mr. Frederic Ouvry, that he had to reply to a humorous proposal for publication of it, in his own manner, in his own periodical. "Your modesty is equal to your merit. . . . I think your way of describing that rustic courtship in middle life, quite matchless. . . . A cheque for £1000 is lying with the publisher. We would willingly make it more, but that we find our law charges so exceedingly heavy." His letters have also examples now and then of what he called his conversational triumphs. "I have distinguished myself" (28th of April 1861) "in two respects lately. I took a young lady, unknown, down to dinner, and, talking to her about the Bishop of Durham's nepotism in the matter of Mr. Cheese, I found she was Mrs. Cheese. And I expatiated to the member for Marylebone, Lord Fermoy, generally conceiving him to be an Irish member, on the contemptible character of the Marylebone constituency and Marylebone representation."
Other nice little stories can be mostly found in his letters. "An old priest" (he wrote from France in 1862), "the exact likeness of Frederic Lemaitre dressed for the role, and really grumpy with a toothache, told me in a train the other day that we had no ancient artifacts in heretical England. 'None at all?' I asked. 'You do have some ships, though.' 'Yes; a few.' 'Are they strong?' 'Well,' I said, 'your trade is spiritual, my father: ask the ghost of[522] Nelson.' A French captain who was on the train was hugely amused by this little joke. I saw him in Calais yesterday heading somewhere with a group, and he said—Pardon! But he had been so narrow-minded as to think an Englishman incapable of such good humor!" He excelled at humor, both in writing and conversation, and for this kind of enjoyment, even his least significant little notes are often worth keeping. Here's one small example. He had enjoyed a story told by his friend and lawyer Mr. Frederic Ouvry so much that he had to respond to a funny suggestion for publishing it in his own style, in his own magazine. "Your modesty matches your talent... I think your way of describing that middle-aged rural courtship is truly unmatched... A check for £1000 is with the publisher. We would happily make it more, but we find our legal fees are extremely high." His letters also include examples now and then of what he referred to as his conversational victories. "I have distinguished myself" (April 28, 1861) "in two ways lately. I took a young woman, whom I didn't know, down to dinner, and, while talking to her about the Bishop of Durham's nepotism regarding Mr. Cheese, I discovered she was Mrs. Cheese. And I went on to discuss with the member for Marylebone, Lord Fermoy, who I thought was an Irish member, the pathetic nature of the Marylebone constituency and its representation."
Among his good things should not be omitted his telling of a ghost story. He had something of a hankering after them, as the readers of his briefer pieces will know; and such was his interest generally[523] in things supernatural that, but for the strong restraining power of his common sense, he might have fallen into the follies of spiritualism. As it was, the fanciful side of his nature stopped short at such pardonable superstitions as those of dreams, and lucky days, or other marvels of natural coincidence; and no man was readier to apply sharp tests to a ghost story or a haunted house, though there was just so much tendency to believe in any such, "well-authenticated," as made perfect his manner of telling one. Such a story is related in the 125th number of All the Year Round, which before its publication both Mr. Layard and myself saw at Gadshill, and identified as one related by Lord Lytton. It was published in September, and in a day or two led to what Dickens will relate. "The artist himself who is the hero of that story" (to Lord Lytton, 15th of September 1861) "has sent me in black and white his own account of the whole experience, so very original, so very extraordinary, so very far beyond the version I have published, that all other like stories turn pale before it." The ghost thus reinforced came out in the number published on the 5th of October; and the reader who cares to turn to it, and compare what Dickens in the interval (17th of September) wrote to myself, will have some measure of his readiness to believe in such things. "Upon the publication of the ghost story, up has started the portrait-painter who saw the phantoms! His own written story is out of all distance the most extraordinary that ever was produced; and is as far beyond my version or Bulwer's, as Scott is beyond James. Everything connected with it is amazing; but conceive this—the portrait-painter[524] had been engaged to write it elsewhere as a story for next Christmas, and not unnaturally supposed, when he saw himself anticipated in All the Year Round, that there had been treachery at his printer's. 'In particular,' says he, 'how else was it possible that the date, the 13th of September, could have been got at? For I never told the date, until I wrote it.' Now, my story had no date; but seeing, when I looked over the proof, the great importance of having a date, I (C. D.) wrote in, unconsciously, the exact date on the margin of the proof!" The reader will remember the Doncaster race story; and to other like illustrations of the subject already given, may be added this dream. "Here is a curious case at first-hand" (30th of May 1863). "On Thursday night in last week, being at the office here, I dreamed that I saw a lady in a red shawl with her back towards me (whom I supposed to be E.). On her turning round I found that I didn't know her, and she said 'I am Miss Napier.' All the time I was dressing next morning, I thought—What a preposterous thing to have so very distinct a dream about nothing! and why Miss Napier? for I never heard of any Miss Napier. That same Friday night, I read. After the reading, came into my retiring-room, Mary Boyle and her brother, and the Lady in the red shawl whom they present as 'Miss Napier!' These are all the circumstances, exactly told."
Among his good qualities, his talent for telling ghost stories shouldn't be overlooked. He had a bit of a fascination with them, as readers of his shorter pieces will recognize; and his general interest in the supernatural was such that, without the strong influence of his common sense, he might have fallen into the traps of spiritualism. As it was, the imaginative side of his personality stopped at harmless superstitions like dreams, lucky days, or other natural coincidences. No one was quicker to apply strict tests to a ghost story or a haunted house, although he did have just enough inclination to believe in any "well-authenticated" stories, which made his storytelling style even better. Such a story is found in the 125th issue of All the Year Round, which both Mr. Layard and I saw at Gadshill before it was published and identified as one related by Lord Lytton. It was published in September, and just a day or two later, it led to what Dickens would later describe. "The artist himself who is the hero of that story" (to Lord Lytton, September 15, 1861) "has sent me in writing his own account of the whole experience, which is so original, so extraordinary, and so far beyond the version I published that all other similar stories pale in comparison." The enhanced ghost story appeared in the issue published on October 5; and readers who want to compare what Dickens wrote to me in the meantime (September 17) will get a sense of his willingness to believe in such things. "After the ghost story was published, up pops the portrait painter who saw the apparitions! His own written account is by far the most extraordinary ever produced, and is as much beyond my version or Bulwer's as Scott is beyond James. Everything connected with it is astonishing; but consider this— the portrait painter had been contracted to write it elsewhere as a story for the next Christmas, and not surprisingly assumed, when he saw it published in All the Year Round, that his printer had betrayed him. 'In particular,' he says, 'how else could the date, September 13, have been known? Because I never revealed the date until I wrote it.' Now, my story had no date; but when I reviewed the proof, realizing the importance of having a date, I (C. D.) unconsciously wrote in the exact date on the margin of the proof!" The reader may remember the Doncaster race story; and to other similar examples already provided, this dream can be added. "Here is a curious case firsthand" (May 30, 1863). "Last Thursday night, while I was at the office, I dreamed I saw a lady in a red shawl with her back to me (whom I thought was E.). When she turned around, I discovered I didn’t know her, and she said, 'I am Miss Napier.' All the while I was getting ready the next morning, I thought—What a ridiculous dream to have so vividly about nothing! And why Miss Napier? I had never heard of any Miss Napier. That same Friday night, I attended a reading. After the reading, I went into my private room, and in walked Mary Boyle and her brother, along with the lady in the red shawl whom they introduced as 'Miss Napier!' These are all the details, stated exactly."
Another kind of dream has had previous record, with no superstition to build itself upon but the loving devotion to one tender memory. With longer or shorter intervals this was with him all his days. Never from his waking thoughts was the recollection altogether[525] absent; and though the dream would leave him for a time, it unfailingly came back. It was the feeling of his life that always had a mastery over him. What he said on the sixth anniversary of the death of his sister-in-law, that friend of his youth whom he had made his ideal of all moral excellence, he might have said as truly after twenty-six years more. In the very year before he died, the influence was potently upon him. "She is so much in my thoughts at all times, especially when I am successful, and have greatly prospered in anything, that the recollection of her is an essential part of my being, and is as inseparable from my existence as the beating of my heart is." Through later troubled years, whatever was worthiest in him found in this an ark of safety; and it was the nobler part of his being which had thus become also the essential. It gave to success what success by itself had no power to give; and nothing could consist with it, for any length of time, that was not of good report and pure. What more could I say that was not better said from the pulpit of the Abbey where he rests?
Another kind of dream has existed before, not based on superstition but on a deep love for one cherished memory. This feeling was with him all his life, showing up at various intervals. He never completely forgot it in his waking thoughts; even if the dream faded away for a while, it always returned. It was the essence of his life that consistently influenced him. What he expressed on the sixth anniversary of his sister-in-law's death—his friend from youth, whom he looked up to as the ideal of moral excellence—he could have said just as genuinely after another twenty-six years. Even in the year before his death, her presence weighed heavily on him. "She is always on my mind, especially when I succeed and thrive in anything, to the point that remembering her is a fundamental part of who I am, just as necessary as my heart beating." Through his later, troubled years, anything truly worthy in him found a safe haven in this memory; it was the nobler part of him that became essential. It added meaning to success that success alone could not provide, and nothing could coexist with it for long that was not good and pure. What more could I say that wouldn’t be better expressed from the pulpit of the Abbey where he rests?
"He whom we mourn was the friend of mankind, a philanthropist in the true sense; the friend of youth, the friend of the poor, the enemy of every form of meanness and oppression. I am not going to attempt to draw a portrait of him. Men of genius are different from what we suppose them to be. They have greater pleasures and greater pains, greater affections and greater temptations, than the generality of mankind, and they can never be altogether understood by their fellow men. . . . But we feel that a light has gone out, that the world is darker to us, when they depart.[526] There are so very few of them that we cannot afford to lose them one by one, and we look vainly round for others who may supply their places. He whose loss we now mourn occupied a greater space than any other writer in the minds of Englishmen during the last thirty-three years. We read him, talked about him, acted him; we laughed with him; we were roused by him to a consciousness of the misery of others, and to a pathetic interest in human life. Works of fiction, indirectly, are great instructors of this world; and we can hardly exaggerate the debt of gratitude which is due to a writer who has led us to sympathize with these good, true, sincere, honest English characters of ordinary life, and to laugh at the egotism, the hypocrisy, the false respectability of religious professors and others. To another great humourist who lies in this Church the words have been applied that his death eclipsed the gaiety of nations. But of him who has been recently taken I would rather say, in humbler language, that no one was ever so much beloved or so much mourned."
The person we're mourning was a true friend to humanity, a genuine philanthropist; he was a friend to young people, a friend to the poor, and an opponent of all forms of unkindness and oppression. I’m not going to try to paint a picture of him. People of genius are often different from how we think they are. They experience deeper joys and sorrows, stronger feelings and temptations than most people do, and they can never be fully understood by others. . . . But we sense that a light has gone out, making the world seem darker to us when they leave. [526] There are so few of them that we can't afford to lose them one by one, and we search in vain for others who can take their place. The person we're mourning held a more significant presence in the minds of English people than any other writer over the last thirty-three years. We read his work, talked about him, acted out his stories; we laughed with him, and he awakened in us an awareness of others' suffering and a deep interest in human life. Fiction, in its own way, teaches us a lot about the world, and we can hardly overstate the gratitude we owe to a writer who helped us empathize with these good, true, sincere, and honest characters from everyday life, while also laughing at the self-importance, hypocrisy, and false respectability of some religious figures and others. Another great humorist, who is also buried in this church, had the phrase applied to him that his death overshadowed the joy of nations. But for the one we've recently lost, I'd prefer to say, in simpler terms, that no one has ever been so loved or so deeply mourned.
CHAPTER XX.
THE END.
1869-1870.
The summer and autumn of 1869 were passed quietly at Gadshill. He received there, in June, the American friends to whom he had been most indebted for unwearying domestic kindness at his most trying time in the States. In August, he was at the dinner of the International boat-race; and, in a speech that might have gone far to reconcile the victors to changing places with the vanquished, gave the healths of the Harvard and the Oxford crews. He went to Birmingham, in September, to fulfil a promise that he would open the session of the Institute; and there, after telling his audience that his invention, such as it was, never would have served him as it had done, but for the habit of[528] commonplace, patient, drudging attention, he declared his political creed to be infinitesimal faith in the people governing and illimitable faith in the People governed. In such engagements as these, with nothing of the kind of strain he had most to dread, there was hardly more movement or change than was necessary to his enjoyment of rest.
The summer and fall of 1869 were spent quietly at Gadshill. In June, he welcomed American friends who had shown him incredible kindness during his hardest times in the States. In August, he attended the dinner for the International boat race, where he gave a speech that could have helped the winners empathize with the losers by toasting the Harvard and Oxford crews. In September, he traveled to Birmingham to keep a promise to open the Institute's session. There, he told the audience that his invention, as modest as it was, wouldn't have been possible without the habit of[528] consistent, patient, hard work. He stated that his political belief was a tiny faith in the people in charge and limitless faith in the people being governed. In these activities, without the kind of pressure he feared the most, there was hardly any more movement or change than what he needed to enjoy his rest.
He had been able to show Mr. Fields something of the interest of London as well as of his Kentish home. He went over its "general post-office" with him, took him among its cheap theatres and poor lodging-houses, and piloted him by night through its most notorious thieves' quarter. Its localities that are pleasantest to a lover of books, such as Johnson's Bolt-court and Goldsmith's Temple-chambers, he explored with him; and, at his visitor's special request, mounted a staircase he had not ascended for more than thirty years, to show the chambers in Furnival's Inn where the first page of Pickwick was written. One more book, unfinished, was to close what that famous book began; and the original of the scene of its opening chapter, the opium-eater's den, was the last place visited. "In a miserable court at night," says Mr. Fields, "we found a haggard old woman blowing at a kind of pipe made of an old ink-bottle; and the words which Dickens puts into the mouth of this wretched creature in Edwin Drood, we heard her croon as we leaned over the tattered bed in which she was lying."
He was able to show Mr. Fields some of the charm of London as well as his home in Kent. He took him to the "general post-office," showed him the cheap theaters and rundown boarding houses, and led him at night through the city’s most notorious criminal area. He explored places that are a delight to book lovers, like Johnson's Bolt Court and Goldsmith's Temple Chambers, with him; and, at his guest's special request, climbed a staircase he hadn’t gone up in over thirty years to show him the chambers in Furnival's Inn where the first page of Pickwick was written. One more unfinished book was meant to conclude what that famous book had started; and the original setting of its opening chapter, the opium-eater's den, was the last stop on their tour. "In a miserable court at night," Mr. Fields says, "we found a gaunt old woman blowing into a kind of pipe made from an old ink bottle; and the words that Dickens has this miserable character say in Edwin Drood, we heard her hum as we leaned over the tattered bed where she lay."
Before beginning his novel he had written his last paper for his weekly publication. It was a notice of my Life of Landor, and contained some interesting recollections of that remarkable man. His memory at[529] this time dwelt much, as was only natural, with past pleasant time, as he saw familiar faces leaving us or likely to leave; and, on the death of one of the comedians associated with the old bright days of Covent Garden, I had intimation of a fancy that had never quitted him since the Cheltenham reading. "I see in the paper to-day that Meadows is dead. I had a talk with him at Coutts's a week or two ago, when he said he was seventy-five, and very weak. Except for having a tearful eye, he looked just the same as ever. My mind still constantly misgives me concerning Macready. Curiously, I don't think he has been ever, for ten minutes together, out of my thoughts since I talked with Meadows last. Well, the year that brings trouble brings comfort too: I have a great success in the boy-line to announce to you. Harry has won the second scholarship at Trinity Hall, which gives him £50 a year as long as he stays there; and I begin to hope that he will get a fellowship." I doubt if anything ever more truly pleased him than this little success of his son Henry at Cambridge. Henry missed the fellowship, but was twenty-ninth wrangler in a fair year, when the wranglers were over forty.
Before starting his novel, he had finished his last article for his weekly publication. It was a review of my Life of Landor and included some fascinating memories of that exceptional man. At this time, he often reminisced about the good old days, especially as he saw familiar faces leaving us or likely to leave; and when one of the actors associated with the joyful times at Covent Garden passed away, I sensed a thought that had lingered with him since the Cheltenham reading. "I saw in the paper today that Meadows has died. I spoke with him at Coutts's a week or two ago, and he mentioned he was seventy-five and quite weak. Other than having a tearful eye, he looked just the same as always. I still can’t shake off my worries about Macready. Strangely, I don’t think he’s left my mind for even ten minutes since I last talked to Meadows. Well, the year that brings trouble also brings comfort: I have some great news to share about my son. Harry has earned the second scholarship at Trinity Hall, which gives him £50 a year as long as he’s there; and I'm starting to hope that he will get a fellowship." I doubt anything ever pleased him more than this small success of his son Henry at Cambridge. Henry missed out on the fellowship, but he ranked twenty-ninth wrangler in a pretty competitive year when the wranglers were over forty.
He finished his first number of Edwin Drood in the third week of October, and on the 26th read it at my house with great spirit. A few nights before we had seen together at the Olympic a little drama taken from his Copperfield, which he sat out with more than patience, even with something of enjoyment; and another pleasure was given him that night by its author, Mr. Halliday, who brought into the box another dramatist, Mr. Robertson, to whom Dickens, who then first saw him,[530] said that to himself the charm of his little comedies was "their unassuming form," which had so happily shown that "real wit could afford to put off any airs of pretension to it." He was at Gadshill till the close of the year; coming up for a few special occasions, such as Procter's eighty-second birthday; and at my house on new-year's eve he read to us, again aloud, a fresh number of his book. Yet these very last days of December had not been without a reminder of the grave warnings of April. The pains in somewhat modified form had returned in both his left hand and his left foot a few days before we met; and they were troubling him still on that day. But he made so light of them himself; so little thought of connecting them with the uncertainties of touch and tread of which they were really part; and read with such an overflow of humour Mr. Honeythunder's boisterous philanthropy; that there was no room, then, for anything but enjoyment. His only allusion to an effect from his illness was his mention of a now invincible dislike which he had to railway travel. This had decided him to take a London house for the twelve last readings in the early months of 1870, and he had become Mr. Milner-Gibson's tenant at 5, Hyde Park Place.
He finished the first part of Edwin Drood in the third week of October, and on the 26th, he read it at my house with great enthusiasm. A few nights earlier, we had seen a play based on his Copperfield at the Olympic, which he watched patiently and even enjoyed a little. That night, he was further delighted by its author, Mr. Halliday, who introduced him to another playwright, Mr. Robertson. Dickens, who met him for the first time, remarked that the charm of Robertson's comedies was "their unpretentious style," which successfully demonstrated that "true wit doesn't need to show off." He stayed at Gadshill until the end of the year, coming to London for special events like Procter's eighty-second birthday. On New Year's Eve, he read aloud a new part of his book at my house. However, those last days of December weren't without reminders of the serious health warnings from April. The aches had returned, though in a milder way, in his left hand and left foot just days before we met, and they were still bothering him that day. But he dismissed them lightly; he hardly connected them to the uncertainties of touch and movement they truly indicated, and he read Mr. Honeythunder's loud philanthropy with such humor that there was only room for enjoyment. The only mention of his illness was his newfound, strong dislike of train travel. This made him decide to rent a house in London for the last twelve readings in the early months of 1870, and he became Mr. Milner-Gibson's tenant at 5, Hyde Park Place.
St. James's Hall was to be the scene of these Readings, and they were to occupy the interval from the 11th of January to the 15th of March; two being given in each week to the close of January, and the remaining eight on each of the eight Tuesdays following. Nothing was said of any kind of apprehension as the time approached; but, with a curious absence of the sense of danger, there was certainly both distrust and fear.[531] Sufficient precaution was supposed to have been taken[303] by arrangement for the presence, at each reading, of his friend and medical attendant, Mr. Carr Beard; but this resolved itself, not into any measure of safety, the case admitting of none short of stopping the reading altogether, but simply into ascertainment of the exact amount of strain and pressure, which, with every fresh exertion, he was placing on those vessels of the brain where the Preston trouble too surely had revealed that danger lay. No supposed force in reserve, no dominant strength of will, can turn aside the penalties sternly exacted for disregard of such laws of life as were here plainly overlooked; and though no one may say that it was not already too late for any but the fatal issue,[532] there will be no presumption in believing that life might yet have been for some time prolonged if these readings could have been stopped.
St. James's Hall was set to host these Readings, which were scheduled from January 11th to March 15th; two sessions would take place each week until the end of January, and the remaining eight would be held on the following eight Tuesdays. As the date drew nearer, there was no talk of any concerns; however, despite a strange lack of awareness about the danger, there was definitely both distrust and fear.[531] Adequate precautions were thought to have been taken[303] by arranging for his friend and doctor, Mr. Carr Beard, to be present at each reading; but this didn't really provide any safety. The only thing it accomplished was to measure the exact extent of the strain and pressure he was putting on those blood vessels in the brain where the Preston issue had unfortunately shown that danger existed. No supposed reserve of strength, no powerful will, can prevent the harsh consequences that come from ignoring the fundamental laws of life that were clearly being overlooked here. Though it might be too late for anything but a fatal outcome,[532] one could reasonably believe that life might have been extended for a while if these readings could have been canceled.
"I am a little shaken," he wrote on the 9th of January, "by my journey to Birmingham to give away the Institution's prizes on Twelfth Night, but I am in good heart; and, notwithstanding Lowe's worrying scheme for collecting a year's taxes in a lump, which they tell me is damaging books, pictures, music, and theatres beyond precedent, our 'let' at St. James's Hall is enormous." He opened with Copperfield and the Pickwick Trial; and I may briefly mention, from the notes taken by Mr. Beard and placed at my disposal, at what cost of exertion to himself he gratified the crowded audiences that then and to the close made these evenings memorable. His ordinary pulse on the first night was at 72; but never on any subsequent night was lower than 82, and had risen on the later nights to more than 100. After Copperfield on the first night it went up to 96, and after Marigold on the second to 99; but on the first night of the Sikes and Nancy scenes (Friday the 21st of January) it went from 80 to 112, and on the second night (the 1st of February) to 118. From this, through the six remaining nights, it never was lower than 110 after the first piece read; and after the third and fourth readings of the Oliver Twist scenes it rose, from 90 to 124 on the 15th of February, and from 94 to 120 on the 8th of March; on the former occasion, after twenty minutes' rest, falling to 98, and on the latter, after fifteen minutes' rest, falling to 82. His ordinary pulse on entering the room, during these last six nights, was more[533] than once over 100, and never lower than 84; from which it rose, after Nickleby on the 22nd of February, to 112. On the 8th of February, when he read Dombey, it had risen from 91 to 114; on the 1st of March, after Copperfield, it rose from 100 to 124; and when he entered the room on the last night it was at 108, having risen only two beats more when the reading was done. The pieces on this occasion were the Christmas Carol, followed by the Pickwick Trial; and probably in all his life he never read so well. On his return from the States, where he had to address his effects to audiences composed of immense numbers of people, a certain loss of refinement had been observable; but the old delicacy was now again delightfully manifest, and a subdued tone, as well in the humorous as the serious portions, gave something to all the reading as of a quiet sadness of farewell. The charm of this was at its height when he shut the volume of Pickwick and spoke in his own person. He said that for fifteen years he had been reading his own books to audiences whose sensitive and kindly recognition of them had given him instruction and enjoyment in his art such as few men could have had; but that he nevertheless thought it well now to retire upon older associations, and in future to devote himself exclusively to the calling which had first made him known. "In but two short weeks from this time I hope that you may enter, in your own homes, on a new series of readings at which my assistance will be indispensable; but from these garish lights I vanish now for evermore, with a heartfelt, grateful, respectful, affectionate farewell." The brief hush of silence as he moved from the platform; and[534] the prolonged tumult of sound that followed suddenly, stayed him, and again for another moment brought him back; will not be forgotten by any present.
"I’m feeling a bit shaken," he wrote on January 9th, "after my trip to Birmingham to present the Institution's prizes on Twelfth Night, but I’m in good spirits; and despite Lowe's concerning plan to collect a year's taxes all at once, which I hear is damaging books, art, music, and theaters more than ever, our performance at St. James's Hall is fantastic." He started with Copperfield and the Pickwick Trial; and I want to briefly mention, based on notes from Mr. Beard that were shared with me, how much effort he put in to please the packed audiences that were present then and until the end, making those evenings unforgettable. His regular pulse on the first night was at 72; but on any following night, it was never lower than 82 and had risen on the later nights to over 100. After Copperfield on the first night, it went up to 96, and after Marigold on the second night, it reached 99; but on the first night of the Sikes and Nancy scenes (Friday, January 21st), it jumped from 80 to 112, and on the second night (February 1st), it went up to 118. For the remaining six nights, it never dropped below 110 after the first piece was read; and after the third and fourth readings of the Oliver Twist scenes, it rose from 90 to 124 on February 15th, and from 94 to 120 on March 8th; on the first occasion, after a twenty-minute break, it fell to 98, and on the latter, after a fifteen-minute break, to 82. His normal pulse when he entered the room during those last six nights was more than once over 100, and never lower than 84; from which point it rose, after Nickleby on February 22nd, to 112. On February 8th, when he read Dombey, it had increased from 91 to 114; on March 1st, after Copperfield, it went from 100 to 124; and when he entered the room on the final night, it was at 108, having only increased by two beats when the reading finished. The pieces that night were the Christmas Carol, followed by the Pickwick Trial; and possibly in his entire life, he had never performed so well. After returning from the States, where he had to speak to huge crowds, a slight loss of finesse had been noticeable; but the old elegance was now delightfully present again, and a softer tone, both in the humorous and serious sections, added a quiet sadness of farewell to all the readings. This charm peaked when he closed the volume of Pickwick and spoke as himself. He said that for fifteen years, he had been reading his own works to audiences whose sensitive and warm acknowledgment had provided him with satisfaction and inspiration in his craft that few others could claim; but that he believed it was now time to step back into older connections, and in the future to focus entirely on the profession that had first made him famous. "In just two short weeks from now, I hope you may begin, in your own homes, a new series of readings where my presence will be essential; but from these bright lights, I now disappear forever, with a sincere, grateful, respectful, and affectionate goodbye." The brief silence as he left the stage; and the loud applause that followed suddenly made him pause and brought him back for a moment; those present will never forget it.
Little remains to be told that has not in it almost unmixed pain and sorrow. Hardly a day passed, while the readings went on or after they closed, unvisited by some effect or other of the disastrous excitement shown by the notes of Mr. Beard. On the 23rd of January, when for the last time he met Carlyle, he came to us with his left hand in a sling; on the 7th of February, when he passed with us his last birthday, and on the 25th, when he read the third number of his novel, the hand was still swollen and painful; and on the 21st of March, when he read admirably his fourth number, he told us that as he came along, walking up the length of Oxford-street, the same incident had recurred as on the day of a former dinner with us, and he had not been able to read, all the way, more than the right-hand half of the names over the shops. Yet he had the old fixed persuasion that this was rather the effect of a medicine he had been taking than of any grave cause, and he still strongly believed his other troubles to be exclusively local. Eight days later he wrote: "My uneasiness and hemorrhage, after having quite left me, as I supposed, has come back with an aggravated irritability that it has not yet displayed. You have no idea what a state I am in to-day from a sudden violent rush of it; and yet it has not the slightest effect on my general health that I know of." This was a disorder which troubled him in his earlier life; and during the last five years, in his intervals of suffering from other causes, it had from time to time taken aggravated form.[535]
Little remains to be said that doesn’t contain nearly pure pain and sorrow. Hardly a day went by, during the readings or after they wrapped up, without being impacted by some outcome of the disastrous excitement indicated by Mr. Beard's notes. On January 23rd, when he met Carlyle for the last time, he came to us with his left hand in a sling; on February 7th, when he celebrated his last birthday with us, and again on the 25th, when he read the third part of his novel, his hand was still swollen and painful. On March 21st, when he admirably read the fourth part, he mentioned that as he walked along Oxford Street, he experienced the same issue he had on a previous dinner with us and could only read the right side of the names over the shops. Still, he held onto the belief that this was more a side effect of a medicine he was taking rather than anything serious, and he was convinced that his other issues were purely local. Eight days later, he wrote: "My uneasiness and bleeding, which I thought had completely gone away, has returned with an increased irritability that it hasn't shown before. You can't imagine the state I'm in today from a sudden, severe rush of it; yet, to my knowledge, it doesn’t affect my overall health at all." This was a condition he struggled with earlier in life, and over the last five years, amidst other issues, it had occasionally flared up.[535]
His last public appearances were in April. On the 5th he took the chair for the Newsvendors, whom he helped with a genial address in which even his apology for little speaking overflowed with irrepressible humour. He would try, he said, like Falstaff, "but with a modification almost as large as himself," less to speak himself than to be the cause of speaking in others. "Much in this manner they exhibit at the door of a snuff-shop the effigy of a Highlander with an empty mull in his hand, who, apparently having taken all the snuff he can carry, and discharged all the sneezes of which he is capable, politely invites his friends and patrons to step in and try what they can do in the same line." On the 30th of the same month he returned thanks for "Literature" at the Royal Academy dinner, and I may preface my allusion to what he then said with what he had written to me the day before. Three days earlier Daniel Maclise had passed away. "Like you at Ely, so I at Higham, had the shock of first reading at a railway station of the death of our old dear friend and companion. What the shock would be, you know too well. It has been only after great difficulty, and after hardening and steeling myself to the subject by at once thinking of it and avoiding it in a strange way, that I have been able to get any command over it or over myself. If I feel at the time that I can be sure of the necessary composure, I shall make a little reference to it at the Academy to-morrow. I suppose you won't be there."[304] The reference made was most touching and[536] manly. He told those who listened that since he first entered the public lists, a very young man indeed, it had been his constant fortune to number among his nearest and dearest friends members of that Academy who had been its pride; and who had now, one by one, so dropped from his side that he was grown to believe, with the Spanish monk of whom Wilkie spoke, that the only realities around him were the pictures which he loved, and all the moving life but a shadow and a dream. "For many years I was one of the two most intimate friends and most constant companions of Mr. Maclise, to whose death the Prince of Wales has made allusion, and the President has referred with the eloquence of genuine feeling. Of his genius in his chosen art, I will venture to say nothing here; but of his fertility of mind and wealth of intellect I may confidently assert that they would have made him, if he had been so minded, at least as great a writer as he was a painter. The gentlest and most modest of men, the freshest as to his generous appreciation of young aspirants and the frankest and largest hearted as to his peers, incapable of a sordid or ignoble thought, gallantly sustaining[537] the true dignity of his vocation, without one grain of self-ambition, wholesomely natural at the last as at the first, 'in wit a man, simplicity a child,'—no artist of whatsoever denomination, I make bold to say, ever went to his rest leaving a golden memory more pure from dross, or having devoted himself with a truer chivalry to the art-goddess whom he worshipped." These were the last public words of Dickens, and he could not have spoken any worthier.
His last public appearances were in April. On the 5th, he chaired the Newsvendors, delivering a friendly speech in which his apology for speaking little was filled with irresistible humor. He stated that he would try, like Falstaff, "but with a modification almost as large as himself," aiming less to speak himself than to inspire others to speak. "Much like they display at the entrance of a snuff shop an image of a Highlander holding an empty container, who, seemingly having snorted all the snuff he can handle and sneezed all he is able to, politely invites his friends and customers to step in and see what they can do in the same vein." On the 30th of that same month, he expressed his gratitude for "Literature" at the Royal Academy dinner, and I can introduce what he said by mentioning what he wrote to me the day before. Three days earlier, Daniel Maclise had passed away. "Like you at Ely, I at Higham received the shocking news of the death of our old dear friend and companion at a train station. You know all too well what the shock was like. After much difficulty and by hardening myself to the subject through both thinking about it and avoiding it in a peculiar way, I have managed to get a grip on it and on myself. If I feel prepared enough to maintain my composure, I’ll make a brief mention of it at the Academy tomorrow. I suppose you won't be there." [304] The mention was incredibly heartfelt and strong. He told those listening that since he first entered public life, as a very young man, he had consistently been fortunate to count among his closest friends members of that Academy who had brought it pride; now, one by one, they had departed from his side, leading him to believe, as the Spanish monk that Wilkie referred to, that the only true realities around him were the pictures he loved, and all the living life was just a shadow and a dream. "For many years I was one of the two closest friends and most constant companions of Mr. Maclise, whose death the Prince of Wales mentioned, and the President referred to with genuine eloquence. I won't say anything about his genius in his chosen art here; but regarding his creativity and intellect, I can confidently state that he could have been, if he had chosen, at least as great a writer as he was a painter. He was the gentlest and most humble of men, always generously appreciating young talents and being open-hearted and broad-minded towards his peers, incapable of any petty or unworthy thought, valiantly upholding the true dignity of his vocation, with not a shred of self-ambition, naturally genuine at every stage of his life—'in wit a man, simplicity a child'—no artist of any kind, I dare say, ever left this world with a more pure golden memory, having devoted himself with truer chivalry to the art-goddess he admired." These were Dickens's last public words, and he couldn't have spoken any more admirably.
Upon his appearance at the dinner of the Academy had followed some invitations he was led to accept; greatly to his own regret, he told me on the night (7th of May) when he read to us the fifth number of Edwin Drood; for he was now very eager to get back to the quiet of Gadshill. He dined with Mr. Motley, then American minister; had met Mr. Disraeli at a dinner at Lord Stanhope's; had breakfasted with Mr. Gladstone; and on the 17th was to attend the Queen's ball with his daughter. But she had to go there without him; for on the 16th I had intimation of a sudden disablement. "I am sorry to report, that, in the old preposterous endeavour to dine at preposterous hours and preposterous places, I have been pulled up by a sharp attack in my foot. And serve me right. I hope to get the better of it soon, but I fear I must not think of dining with you on Friday. I have cancelled everything in the dining way for this week, and that is a very small precaution after the horrible pain I have had and the remedies I have taken." He had to excuse himself also from the General Theatrical Fund dinner, where the Prince of Wales was to preside; but at another dinner a week later, where the King of the[538] Belgians and the Prince were to be present, so much pressure was put upon him that he went, still suffering as he was, to dine with Lord Houghton.
When he showed up at the Academy dinner, he ended up accepting some invitations he really regretted, as he told me on the night of May 7th when he read the fifth installment of Edwin Drood; he was eager to get back to the peace of Gadshill. He had dinner with Mr. Motley, the American minister; met Mr. Disraeli at a dinner at Lord Stanhope’s; had breakfast with Mr. Gladstone; and was supposed to attend the Queen’s ball with his daughter on the 17th. But she had to go without him because on the 16th I learned of a sudden health issue. "I’m sorry to say that, in my usual ridiculous attempt to have dinner at ridiculous times and places, I’ve been struck down with a sharp pain in my foot. And I deserve it. I hope to recover soon, but I’m afraid I can’t think about having dinner with you on Friday. I’ve canceled all my dinner plans for this week, and that feels like a minor precaution after the awful pain I’ve had and the treatments I’ve tried." He also had to excuse himself from the General Theatrical Fund dinner where the Prince of Wales was going to be in charge; but at another dinner a week later, with the King of the Belgians and the Prince attending, he was put under so much pressure that he went, even while still in pain, to dine with Lord Houghton.
We met for the last time on Sunday the 22nd of May, when I dined with him in Hyde Park Place. The death of Mr. Lemon, of which he heard that day, had led his thoughts to the crowd of friendly companions in letters and art who had so fallen from the ranks since we played Ben Jonson together that we were left almost alone. "And none beyond his sixtieth year," he said, "very few even fifty." It is no good to talk of it, I suggested. "We shall not think of it the less" was his reply; and an illustration much to the point was before us, afforded by an incident deserving remembrance in his story. Not many weeks before, a correspondent had written to him from Liverpool describing himself as a self-raised man, attributing his prosperous career to what Dickens's writings had taught him at its outset of the wisdom of kindness, and sympathy for others; and asking pardon for the liberty he took in hoping that he might be permitted to offer some acknowledgment of what not only had cheered and stimulated him through all his life, but had contributed so much to the success of it. The letter enclosed £500. Dickens was greatly touched by this; and told the writer, in sending back his cheque, that he would certainly have taken it if he had not been, though not a man of fortune, a prosperous man himself; but that the letter, and the spirit of its offer, had so gratified him, that if the writer pleased to send him any small memorial of it in another form he would gladly receive it. The memorial soon came. A richly worked basket[539] of silver, inscribed "from one who has been cheered and stimulated by Mr. Dickens's writings, and held the author among his first remembrances when he became prosperous," was accompanied by an extremely handsome silver centrepiece for the table, of which the design was four figures representing the Seasons. But the kindly donor shrank from sending Winter to one whom he would fain connect with none but the brighter and milder days, and he had struck the fourth figure from the design. "I never look at it," said Dickens, "that I don't think most of the Winter."
We met for the last time on Sunday, May 22nd, when I had dinner with him at Hyde Park Place. The news of Mr. Lemon's death, which he heard that day, led him to reflect on the many friendly companions in letters and art who had passed away since we performed Ben Jonson together, leaving us almost alone. "And none beyond his sixtieth year," he remarked, “and very few even reached fifty.” I suggested it was pointless to talk about it. "We won’t think about it any less," he replied, and a relevant illustration came to mind from his own story. Just a few weeks earlier, a correspondent from Liverpool had written to him, describing himself as a self-made man and crediting his successful career to the wisdom of kindness and empathy he learned from Dickens’s writings early on. He asked for forgiveness for taking the liberty of hoping to acknowledge what had not only encouraged and inspired him throughout his life but had also contributed significantly to his success. The letter included a donation of £500. Dickens was deeply moved by this; in his reply, he said he would have happily accepted it if he weren’t, while not wealthy, a successful man himself. However, the letter and its generous spirit made him feel so appreciated that he would gladly accept any small keepsake related to it. The keepsake soon arrived—a beautifully crafted silver basket inscribed "from one who has been cheered and inspired by Mr. Dickens's writings, and always remembers the author among his first thoughts when becoming successful," accompanied by an exquisite silver centerpiece for the table featuring four figures representing the Seasons. But the thoughtful donor chose to exclude Winter, as he wanted to connect Dickens with only brighter and milder days, removing the fourth figure from the design. "Every time I look at it," said Dickens, "I can't help but think of Winter."
A matter discussed that day with Mr. Ouvry was briefly resumed in a note of the 29th of May, the last I ever received from him; which followed me to Exeter, and closed thus. "You and I can speak of it at Gads by and by. Foot no worse. But no better." The old trouble was upon him when we parted, and this must have been nearly the last note written before he quitted London. He was at Gadshill on the 30th of May; and I heard no more until the telegram reached me at Launceston on the night of the 9th of June, which told me that the "by and by" was not to come in this world.
A topic we discussed that day with Mr. Ouvry was briefly revisited in a note dated May 29, the last one I ever received from him. It followed me to Exeter and ended like this: “You and I can talk about it at Gads later. Foot no worse. But no better.” The old problem was still bothering him when we said goodbye, and this must have been one of the last notes he wrote before leaving London. He was at Gadshill on May 30, and I didn’t hear anything more until I got a telegram in Launceston on the night of June 9, which informed me that the “later” wouldn’t happen in this world.
The few days at Gadshill had been given wholly to work on his novel. He had been easier in his foot and hand; and, though he was suffering severely from the local hemorrhage before named, he made no complaint of illness. But there was observed in him a very unusual appearance of fatigue. "He seemed very weary." He was out with his dogs for the last time on Monday the 6th of June, when he walked with his letters into Rochester. On Tuesday the 7th, after his daughter[540] Mary had left on a visit to her sister Kate, not finding himself equal to much fatigue, he drove to Cobhamwood with his sister-in-law, there dismissed the carriage, and walked round the park and back. He returned in time to put up in his new conservatory some Chinese lanterns sent from London that afternoon; and, the whole of the evening, he sat with Miss Hogarth in the dining-room that he might see their effect when lighted. More than once he then expressed his satisfaction at having finally abandoned all intention of exchanging Gadshill for London; and this he had done more impressively some days before. While he lived, he said, he should like his name to be more and more associated with the place; and he had a notion that when he died he should like to lie in the little graveyard belonging to the Cathedral at the foot of the Castle wall.
The few days at Gadshill had been entirely dedicated to working on his novel. He felt more comfortable in his foot and hand; and although he was suffering significantly from the previously mentioned local hemorrhage, he didn’t complain about being ill. However, he did appear unusually tired. "He seemed very weary." He took his dogs out for the last time on Monday, June 6th, when he walked into Rochester with his letters. On Tuesday, June 7th, after his daughter Mary left to visit her sister Kate, feeling unable to do much, he drove to Cobhamwood with his sister-in-law, got out of the carriage, and walked around the park and back. He returned in time to hang up some Chinese lanterns sent from London that afternoon in his new conservatory; and he spent the entire evening in the dining room with Miss Hogarth to see how they looked when lit. More than once, he expressed his satisfaction at finally giving up the idea of moving from Gadshill to London; and he had emphasized this even more impressively days earlier. While he was alive, he said, he wanted his name to be increasingly associated with the place; and he had a feeling that when he died, he would like to be laid to rest in the small graveyard by the Cathedral at the foot of the Castle wall.
On the 8th of June he passed all the day writing in the Châlet. He came over for luncheon; and, much against his usual custom, returned to his desk. Of the sentences he was then writing, the last of his long life of literature, a portion has been given in facsimile on a previous page; and the reader will observe with a painful interest, not alone its evidence of minute labour at this fast-closing hour of time with him, but the direction his thoughts had taken. He imagines such a brilliant morning as had risen with that eighth of June shining on the old city of Rochester. He sees in surpassing beauty, with the lusty ivy gleaming in the sun, and the rich trees waving in the balmy air, its antiquities and its ruins; its Cathedral and Castle. But his fancy, then, is not with the stern dead forms[541] of either; but with that which makes warm the cold stone tombs of centuries, and lights them up with flecks of brightness, "fluttering there like wings." To him, on that sunny summer morning, the changes of glorious light from moving boughs, the songs of birds, the scents from garden, woods, and fields, have penetrated into the Cathedral, have subdued its earthy odour, and are preaching the Resurrection and the Life.
On June 8th, he spent the entire day writing in the Châlet. He came over for lunch, and, much to his surprise, went back to his desk afterward. A part of the last sentences he was writing—his final work in literature—was reproduced in facsimile on a previous page. The reader will notice, with a heavy heart, not only the evidence of intricate labor at this closing moment of his life but also the direction of his thoughts. He imagines a beautiful morning with the June 8th sun shining over the old city of Rochester. He sees the vibrant ivy glistening in the sunlight and the lush trees swaying in the gentle breeze, admiring its historic landmarks and ruins: the Cathedral and the Castle. However, his imagination is not focused on the stark, lifeless forms of either; instead, it is on what warms the cold stone tombs of centuries and lights them up with spots of brightness, "fluttering there like wings." To him, on that sunny summer morning, the shifting rays of light from the moving branches, the songs of birds, and the scents from the garden, woods, and fields have entered the Cathedral, softening its earthy scent, preaching the Resurrection and the Life.
He was late in leaving the Châlet; but before dinner, which was ordered at six o'clock with the intention of walking afterwards in the lanes, he wrote some letters, among them one to his friend Mr. Charles Kent appointing to see him in London next day; and dinner was begun before Miss Hogarth saw, with alarm, a singular expression of trouble and pain in his face. "For an hour," he then told her, "he had been very ill;" but he wished dinner to go on. These were the only really coherent words uttered by him. They were followed by some, that fell from him disconnectedly, of quite other matters; of an approaching sale at a neighbour's house, of whether Macready's son was with his father at Cheltenham, and of his own intention to go immediately to London; but at these latter he had risen, and his sister-in-law's help alone prevented him from falling where he stood. Her effort then was to get him on the sofa, but after a slight struggle he sank heavily on his left side. "On the ground" were the last words he spoke. It was now a little over ten minutes past six o'clock. His two daughters came that night with Mr. Beard, who had also been telegraphed for, and whom they met at the[542] station. His eldest son arrived early next morning, and was joined in the evening (too late) by his younger son from Cambridge. All possible medical aid had been summoned. The surgeon of the neighbourhood was there from the first, and a physician from London was in attendance as well as Mr. Beard. But all human help was unavailing. There was effusion on the brain; and though stertorous breathing continued all night, and until ten minutes past six o'clock on the evening of Thursday the 9th of June, there had never been a gleam of hope during the twenty-four hours. He had lived four months beyond his 58th year.
He was late leaving the Châlet, but before dinner, which was scheduled for six o'clock with plans to take a walk afterward, he wrote some letters, including one to his friend Mr. Charles Kent, arranging to meet him in London the next day. Dinner started before Miss Hogarth noticed, with concern, a strange look of trouble and pain on his face. “For an hour,” he then told her, “I’ve been very sick,” but he wanted dinner to continue. These were the only coherent words he spoke. After that, he went off on unrelated topics, mentioning an upcoming sale at a neighbor's house, whether Macready’s son was with his father at Cheltenham, and his own plan to head to London right away; but as he mentioned this, he stood up, and only his sister-in-law's support kept him from collapsing. She tried to help him onto the sofa, but after a brief struggle, he fell heavily onto his left side. “On the ground” were the last words he said. It was now just a little after six o'clock. That night, his two daughters arrived with Mr. Beard, who had also been telegraphed for, and they met him at the[542] station. His eldest son got there early the next morning, and his younger son came from Cambridge later that evening (too late). All possible medical help had been called in. The local surgeon was there from the start, and a physician from London was also present along with Mr. Beard. But all human assistance was useless. There was fluid on the brain, and although he breathed heavily throughout the night until ten minutes past six o'clock on the evening of Thursday, June 9, there had never been a glimmer of hope during the entire twenty-four hours. He had lived four months past his 58th birthday.
The excitement and sorrow at his death are within the memory of all. Before the news of it even reached the remoter parts of England, it had been flashed across Europe; was known in the distant continents of India, Australia, and America; and not in English-speaking communities only, but in every country of the civilised earth, had awakened grief and sympathy. In his own land it was as if a personal bereavement had befallen every one. Her Majesty the Queen telegraphed from Balmoral "her deepest regret at the sad news of Charles Dickens's death;" and this was the sentiment alike of all classes of her people. There was not an English journal that did not give it touching and noble utterance; and the Times took the lead in suggesting[305] that the only fit resting-place for the[543] remains of a man so dear to England was the Abbey in which the most illustrious Englishmen are laid.
The excitement and sadness over his death are in everyone’s memory. Even before the news reached the more remote areas of England, it had spread across Europe; it was known in far-off continents like India, Australia, and America; and not just in English-speaking communities, but in every civilized country, it had stirred feelings of grief and sympathy. In his own country, it felt like a personal loss for everyone. Her Majesty the Queen sent a message from Balmoral expressing "her deepest regret at the sad news of Charles Dickens's death," and this was the sentiment shared by all levels of her people. There wasn’t an English newspaper that didn’t express it movingly and nobly; and the Times led the way in suggesting[305] that the only appropriate resting place for someone so beloved by England was the Abbey where the most distinguished English figures are buried.
With the expression thus given to a general wish, the Dean of Westminster lost no time in showing ready compliance; and on the morning of the day when it appeared was in communication with the family and representatives. The public homage of a burial in the Abbey had to be reconciled with his own instructions to be privately buried without previous announcement of time or place, and without monument or memorial. He would himself have preferred to lie in the small graveyard under Rochester Castle wall, or in the little churches of Cobham or Shorne; but all these were found to be closed; and the desire of the Dean and Chapter of Rochester to lay him in their Cathedral had been entertained, when the Dean of Westminster's request, and the considerate kindness of his generous assurance that there should be only such ceremonial as[544] would strictly obey all injunctions of privacy, made it a grateful duty to accept that offer. The spot already had been chosen by the Dean; and before mid-day on the following morning, Tuesday the 14th of June, with knowledge of those only who took part in the burial, all was done. The solemnity had not lost by the simplicity. Nothing so grand or so touching could have accompanied it, as the stillness and the silence of the vast Cathedral. Then, later in the day and all the following day, came unbidden mourners in such crowds, that the Dean had to request permission to keep open the grave until Thursday; but after it was closed they did not cease to come, and "all day long," Doctor Stanley wrote on the 17th, "there was a constant pressure to the spot, and many flowers were strewn upon it by unknown hands, many tears shed from unknown eyes." He alluded to this in the impressive funeral discourse delivered by him in the Abbey on the morning of Sunday the 19th, pointing to the fresh flowers that then had been newly thrown (as they still are thrown, in this fourth year after the death), and saying that "the spot would thenceforward be a sacred one with both the New World and the Old, as that of the representative of the literature, not of this island only, but of all who speak our English tongue." The stone placed upon it is inscribed
With the general wish expressed, the Dean of Westminster quickly showed his willingness to comply. On the morning when the announcement was made, he was in touch with the family and their representatives. The public honor of a burial in the Abbey had to be balanced with his own wishes for a private burial without advance notice of the time or place, and without any tombstone or memorial. He would have preferred to rest in the small graveyard beneath the wall of Rochester Castle or in the little churches of Cobham or Shorne; but all of those were found to be closed. The request from the Dean and Chapter of Rochester to bury him in their Cathedral was considered, and the Dean of Westminster's offer, along with his thoughtful assurance that the ceremony would respect all privacy requests, made it a grateful duty to accept that proposal. The location had already been chosen by the Dean, and before noon the next morning, Tuesday, June 14th, with only those involved in the burial aware, everything was completed. The solemnity remained despite the simplicity of the event. Nothing could have been more grand or touching than the stillness and silence of the vast Cathedral. Later that day and the following day, uninvited mourners arrived in such large numbers that the Dean had to ask for permission to keep the grave open until Thursday. Even after it was closed, visitors continued to come, and “all day long,” Doctor Stanley noted on the 17th, “there was a constant stream to the site, and many flowers were laid there by unknown hands, many tears shed from unknown eyes.” He mentioned this in the moving funeral sermon he delivered in the Abbey on the morning of Sunday the 19th, pointing to the fresh flowers that had just been placed (as they still are, even four years after the death), and stating that “the site would from now on be sacred to both the New World and the Old, as it represents the literature not just of this island, but of all who speak our English language.” The stone placed there bears the inscription
Born February 7, 1812. Died June 9, 1870.

The highest associations of both the arts he loved[545] surround him where he lies. Next to him is Richard Cumberland. Mrs. Pritchard's monument looks down upon him, and immediately behind is David Garrick's. Nor is the actor's delightful art more worthily represented than the nobler genius of the author. Facing the grave, and on its left and right, are the monuments of Chaucer, Shakespeare, and Dryden, the three immortals who did most to create and settle the language to which Charles Dickens has given another undying name.
The greatest figures of the arts he admired[545] surround him in his resting place. Beside him is Richard Cumberland. Mrs. Pritchard's monument looks over him, and right behind is David Garrick's. The actor's charming craft is represented just as well as the elevated talent of the author. Facing the grave, on its left and right, are the monuments of Chaucer, Shakespeare, and Dryden, the three immortals who contributed the most to shaping and defining the language that Charles Dickens has added another timeless name to.
APPENDIX.
I.
THE WRITINGS OF CHARLES DICKENS.
1835.
1836.
1837.
1838.
1839.
1840.
1840-1841.
I. Old Curiosity Shop (1840).
II. Barnaby Rudge (1841).
1841.
1842.
1843.
1844.
1845.
1846.
1847.
1848.
1849.
1850.
1851.
1852.
1853.
1854.
1855.
1856.
1857.
1858.
1859.
1860.
1861.
1862.
1863.
1864.
1865.
1866.
1867.
1868.
1870.
II.
THE WILL OF CHARLES DICKENS.
"I, Charles Dickens, of Gadshill Place, Higham in the county of Kent, hereby revoke all my former Wills and Codicils and declare this to be my last Will and Testament. I give the sum of £1000 free of legacy duty to Miss Ellen Lawless Ternan, late of Houghton Place, Ampthill Square, in the county of Middlesex. I give the sum of £19 19 0 to my faithful servant Mrs. Anne Cornelius. I give the sum of £19 19 0 to the daughter and only child of the said Mrs. Anne Cornelius. I give the sum of £19 19 0 to each and every domestic servant, male and female, who shall be in my employment at the time of my decease, and shall have been in my employment for a not less period of time than one year. I give the sum of £1000 free of legacy duty to my daughter Mary Dickens. I also give to my said daughter an annuity of £300 a year, during her life, if she shall so long continue unmarried; such annuity to be considered as accruing from day to day, but to be payable half yearly, the first of such half-yearly payments to be made at the expiration of six months next after my decease. If my said daughter Mary shall marry, such annuity shall cease; and in that case, but in that case only, my said daughter shall share with my other children in the provision hereinafter made for them. I give to my dear sister-in-law Georgina Hogarth the sum of £8000 free of legacy duty. I also give to the said Georgina Hogarth all my personal jewellery not hereinafter mentioned, and all the little familiar objects from my writing-table and my room, and she will know what to do with those things. I also give to the said Georgina Hogarth all my private papers whatsoever and wheresoever, and I leave her my grateful blessing as the best and truest friend man ever had. I give to my eldest son Charles my library of printed books, and my engravings and prints; and I also give to my son Charles the[562] silver salver presented to me at Birmingham, and the silver cup presented to me at Edinburgh, and my shirt studs, shirt pins, and sleeve buttons. And I bequeath unto my said son Charles and my son Henry Fielding Dickens, the sum of £8000 upon trust to invest the same, and from time to time to vary the investments thereof, and to pay the annual income thereof to my wife during her life, and after her decease the said sum of £8000 and the investments thereof shall be in trust for my children (but subject as to my daughter Mary to the proviso hereinbefore contained) who being a son or sons shall have attained or shall attain the age of twenty-one years or being a daughter or daughters shall have attained or shall attain that age or be previously married, in equal shares if more than one. I give my watch (the gold repeater presented to me at Coventry), and I give the chains and seals and all appendages I have worn with it, to my dear and trusty friend John Forster, of Palace Gate House, Kensington, in the county of Middlesex aforesaid; and I also give to the said John Forster such manuscripts of my published works as may be in my possession at the time of my decease. And I devise and bequeath all my real and personal estate (except such as is vested in me as a trustee or mortgagee) unto the said Georgina Hogarth and the said John Forster, their heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns respectively, upon trust that they the said Georgina Hogarth and John Forster, or the survivor of them or the executors or administrators of such survivor, do and shall, at their, his, or her uncontrolled and irresponsible direction, either proceed to an immediate sale or conversion into money of the said real and personal estate (including my copyrights), or defer and postpone any sale or conversion into money, till such time or times as they, he, or she shall think fit, and in the meantime may manage and let the said real and personal estate (including my copyrights), in such manner in all respects as I myself could do, if I were living and acting therein; it being my intention that the trustees or trustee for the time being of this my Will shall have the fullest power over the said real and personal estate which I can give to them, him, or her. And I declare that, until the said real and personal estate shall be sold and converted into money, the rents[563] and annual income thereof respectively shall be paid and applied to the person or persons in the manner and for the purposes to whom and for which the annual income of the monies to arise from the sale or conversion thereof into money would be payable or applicable under this my Will in case the same were sold or converted into money. And I declare that my real estate shall for the purposes of this my Will be considered as converted into personalty upon my decease. And I declare that the said trustees or trustee for the time being, do and shall, with and out of the monies which shall come to their, his, or her hands, under or by virtue of this my Will and the trusts thereof, pay my just debts, funeral and testamentary expenses, and legacies. And I declare that the said trust funds or so much thereof as shall remain after answering the purposes aforesaid, and the annual income thereof, shall be in trust for all my children (but subject as to my daughter Mary to the proviso hereinbefore contained), who being a son or sons shall have attained or shall attain the age of twenty-one years, and being a daughter or daughters shall have attained or shall attain that age or be previously married, in equal shares if more than one. Provided always, that, as regards my copyrights and the produce and profits thereof, my said daughter Mary, notwithstanding the proviso hereinbefore contained with reference to her, shall share with my other children therein whether she be married or not. And I devise the estates vested in me at my decease as a trustee or mortgagee unto the use of the said Georgina Hogarth and John Forster, their heirs and assigns, upon the trusts and subject to the equities affecting the same respectively. And I appoint the said Georgina Hogarth and John Forster executrix and executor of this my Will, and Guardians of the persons of my children during their respective minorities. And lastly, as I have now set down the form of words which my legal advisers assure me are necessary to the plain objects of this my Will, I solemnly enjoin my dear children always to remember how much they owe to the said Georgina Hogarth, and never to be wanting in a grateful and affectionate attachment to her, for they know well that she has been, through all the stages of their growth and progress, their ever[564] useful self-denying and devoted friend. And I desire here simply to record the fact that my wife, since our separation by consent, has been in the receipt from me of an annual income of £600, while all the great charges of a numerous and expensive family have devolved wholly upon myself. I emphatically direct that I be buried in an inexpensive, unostentatious, and strictly private manner; that no public announcement be made of the time or place of my burial; that at the utmost not more than three plain mourning coaches be employed; and that those who attend my funeral wear no scarf, cloak, black bow, long hat-band, or other such revolting absurdity. I direct that my name be inscribed in plain English letters on my tomb, without the addition of 'Mr.' or 'Esquire.' I conjure my friends on no account to make me the subject of any monument, memorial, or testimonial whatever. I rest my claims to the remembrance of my country upon my published works, and to the remembrance of my friends upon their experience of me in addition thereto. I commit my soul to the mercy of God through our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, and I exhort my dear children humbly to try to guide themselves by the teaching of the New Testament in its broad spirit, and to put no faith in any man's narrow construction of its letter here or there. In witness whereof I the said Charles Dickens, the testator, have to this my last Will and Testament set my hand this 12th day of May in the year of our Lord 1869.
I, Charles Dickens, from Gadshill Place, Higham in the county of Kent, hereby revoke all my previous Wills and Codicils and declare this to be my final Will and Testament. I give the amount of £1000 free of legacy duty to Miss Ellen Lawless Ternan, formerly of Houghton Place, Ampthill Square, in the county of Middlesex. I give the amount of £19 19 0 to my loyal servant Mrs. Anne Cornelius. I gift the amount of £19 19 0 to the daughter and only child of Mrs. Anne Cornelius. I give the amount of £19 19 0 to each domestic servant, male and female, who is in my employment at the time of my death, and who has worked for me for at least one year. I give the amount of £1000 free of legacy duty to my daughter Mary Dickens. I also give my daughter an annuity of £300 a year, for as long as she remains unmarried; this annuity is calculated daily but paid half yearly, with the first payment made six months after my death. If my daughter Mary marries, the annuity will end; in that case, she will share with my other children in the provisions mentioned below. I'm giving my dear sister-in-law Georgina Hogarth the sum of £8000 free of legacy duty. I also give Georgina Hogarth all my personal jewelry not otherwise mentioned, along with small items from my writing table and room, as she will know how to handle those items. I also provide Georgina Hogarth all my private papers, wherever they may be, and I bestow upon her my heartfelt gratitude as the best and truest friend I have ever known. I give my eldest son Charles my library of printed books, engravings, and prints; I also give him the [562] silver salver given to me in Birmingham, the silver cup given to me in Edinburgh, and my shirt studs, shirt pins, and sleeve buttons. And I give to my son Charles and my son Henry Fielding Dickens the sum of £8000 in trust to invest and manage the investments, using the annual income for my wife during her lifetime. After her death, the £8000 and the investments will be held in trust for my children (subject to the condition regarding my daughter Mary mentioned earlier), who being sons must be at least twenty-one years old or, if daughters, must also be twenty-one or married, to receive equal shares if there is more than one. I'm giving my watch (the gold repeater awarded to me in Coventry), along with all chains, seals, and accessories I've used with it, to my dear and trusted friend John Forster, of Palace Gate House, Kensington, Middlesex; I also give him any manuscripts of my published works that I possess at the time of my death. I create and leave all my real and personal estate (except what is held by me as a trustee or mortgagee) to Georgina Hogarth and John Forster, their heirs, executors, administrators, and assigns, on the condition that they, or the surviving one of them, must decide whether to immediately sell or convert the estate into money (including my copyrights), or to delay any sale or conversion until they believe it is appropriate. Meanwhile, they may manage and rent the estate (including my copyrights) as I would do if I were still alive; my intention is that the trustees of this Will have full authority over the real and personal estate I can assign to them. And I proclaim that until the real and personal estate is sold and converted into money, the rents and annual income will be distributed as though the estate had already been sold or converted into money under this Will. And I announce that my real estate will, for the purposes of this Will, be treated as converted into personal property upon my death. And I announce that the trustees will pay my just debts, funeral expenses, and legacies from the funds they manage. And I declare that any remaining trust funds, along with the annual income, will be held in trust for all my children (but subject to the condition regarding my daughter Mary mentioned earlier), who being sons must have reached twenty-one years old, and being daughters must have either reached that age or be married, to receive equal shares if there is more than one. Always provided, as it pertains to my copyrights and the earnings from them, my daughter Mary, despite the earlier condition, will share with my other children whether she is married or not. And I plan the properties held by me at the time of my death as a trustee or mortgagee for the benefit of Georgina Hogarth and John Forster, their heirs and assigns, under the trusts and subject to the equities affecting them. And I designate Georgina Hogarth and John Forster as the executor and executrix of this Will, and Guardians of my children's persons during their minority. And finally, having set forth in words required by my legal advisors to meet the clear intentions of this Will, I earnestly urge my dear children to always remember how indebted they are to Georgina Hogarth, and to never fail in their grateful and affectionate regard for her, as they well know she has been, throughout all stages of their growth and development, their ever-helpful, selfless, and devoted friend. And I want to simply record that since our mutual consent to separate, my wife has received an annual income of £600 from me, while I have taken on all the significant responsibilities of a large and expensive family. I firmly request that I be buried in a simple, discreet, and strictly private manner; that no public announcement be made regarding the details of my burial; that no more than three plain mourning coaches be used; and that those attending my funeral wear no scarf, cloak, black bow, long hat-band, or any other such ridiculous display. I direct that my name be inscribed in plain English letters on my tomb, without the addition of 'Mr.' or 'Esquire.' I ask my friends not to create any memorial, monument, or testimonial in my honor. I rely on my published works for the remembrance of my country, and on the experiences of my friends additionally for their memory of me. I commit my soul to God's mercy through our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, and I urge my dear children to humbly guide themselves by the teachings of the New Testament in its broader spirit, resisting any narrow interpretations of its text. As a witness whereof, I, the undersigned Charles Dickens, the testator, have set my hand to this my last Will and Testament on this 12th day of May in the year of our Lord 1869.
"Signed published and declared by the above-named Charles Dickens the testator as and for his last Will and Testament in the presence of us (present together at the same time) who in his presence at his request and in the presence of each other have hereunto subscribed our names as witnesses. | ![]() | Charles Dickens. |
26 Wellington Street, The Strand.
"Henry Walker,"
26 Wellington Street, Strand.
"I, Charles Dickens of Gadshill Place near Rochester in the county of Kent Esquire declare this to be a Codicil to my last Will and Testament which Will bears date the 12th day of May 1869. I give to my son Charles Dickens the younger all my share and interest in the weekly journal called 'All the Year Round,' which is now conducted under Articles of Partnership made between me and William Henry Wills and the said Charles Dickens the younger, and all my share and interest in the stereotypes stock and other effects belonging to the said partnership, he defraying my share of all debts and liabilities of the said partnership which may be outstanding at the time of my decease, and in all other respects I confirm my said Will. In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand the 2nd day of June in the year of our Lord 1870.
"I, Charles Dickens of Gadshill Place near Rochester in the county of Kent, declare this to be an amendment to my last Will and Testament, dated May 12, 1869. I deliver my son Charles Dickens the younger all my share and interest in the weekly journal called 'All the Year Round,' which is currently managed under a Partnership Agreement between me, William Henry Wills, and Charles Dickens the younger. This also includes my share and interest in the stereotypes stock and other assets belonging to the partnership, with him covering my share of all debts and obligations of the partnership that may exist at the time of my passing. In all other respects, I confirm my Will. In witness of whereof, I have set my hand this June 2nd in the year of our Lord 1870."
"Signed and declared by the said Charles Dickens, the testator as and for a Codicil to his Will in the presence of us present at the same time who at his request in his presence and in the presence of each other hereunto subscribe our names as witnesses. | ![]() | Charles Dickens. |
26 Wellington St, Strand.
"Henry Walker,"
26 Wellington Street, Strand.
The real and personal estate,—taking the property bequeathed by the last codicil at a valuation of something less than two years' purchase; and of course before payment of the legacies, the (inconsiderable) debts, and the testamentary and other expenses,—amounted, as nearly as may be calculated, to, £93,000.
The real and personal property—valuing the assets stated in the latest codicil at just under two years' worth of payments; and of course, before settling the legacies, the (small) debts, and the testamentary and other expenses—totaled, as closely as can be estimated, £93,000.
III.
CORRECTIONS MADE IN THE LATER EDITIONS OF THE SECOND VOLUME.
I regret to have had no opportunity until now (May, 1873) of making the corrections which appear in this impression of my second volume. All the early reprints having been called for before the close of 1872, the only change I at that time found possible was amendment of an error at p. 397, as to the date of the first performance at Devonshire House, and of a few others of small importance at pp. 262, 291, 320, 360, 444, and 446.
I'm sorry that I haven’t had the chance until now (May, 1873) to make the corrections included in this edition of my second volume. All the early reprints were requested before the end of 1872, so the only change I could manage at that time was fixing an error on p. 397 regarding the date of the first performance at Devonshire House, along with a few other minor changes on pp. 262, 291, 320, 360, 444, and 446.
P. 50. "Covent-garden" is substituted for "Drury-lane." The Chronicle atoned for its present silence by a severe notice of the man's subsequent appearance at the Haymarket; and of this I am glad to be reminded by Mr. Gruneisen, who wrote the criticism.
P. 50. "Covent-garden" replaces "Drury-lane." The Chronicle made up for its current silence with a harsh review of the man's later performance at the Haymarket; I’m thankful to Mr. Gruneisen, who wrote the critique, for reminding me of this.
50. The son of the publican referred to (Mr. Whelpdale of Streatham), pointing out my error in not having made the Duke of Brunswick the defendant, says he was himself a witness in the case, and has had pride in repeating to his own children what the Chief Justice said of his father.
50. The son of the bartender mentioned (Mr. Whelpdale of Streatham), highlighting my mistake in not naming the Duke of Brunswick as the defendant, says he was a witness in the case himself and takes pride in telling his own kids what the Chief Justice said about his father.
117. The "limpet on the rock" and the "green boots" refer to a wonderful piece by Turner in the previous year's Academy, exhibiting a rock overhanging a magnificent sea, a booted figure appearing on the rock, and at its feet a blotch to represent a limpet: the subject being Napoleon at St. Helena.[567]
117. The "limpet on the rock" and the "green boots" refer to an amazing artwork by Turner displayed at the previous year's Academy. It shows a rock towering over a beautiful sea, with a figure in boots standing on the rock, and at its base, a spot to represent a limpet; the subject is Napoleon at St. Helena.[567]
P. 168. "Assumption" is substituted for "Transfiguration."
P. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__. "Assumption" replaces "Transfiguration."
195. The proper names of the ship and her captain are here given, as the Fantôme, commanded by Sir Frederick (now Vice-Admiral) Nicolson.
195. The official names of the ship and her captain are now provided, as the Fantôme, led by Sir Frederick (now Vice-Admiral) Nicolson.
229. A correspondent familiar with Lausanne informs me that the Castle of Chillon is not visible from Rosemont, and that Dickens in these first days must have mistaken some other object for it. "A long mass of mountain hides Chillon from view, and it only becomes visible when you get about six miles from Lausanne on the Vevay road, when a curve in the road or lake shows it visible behind the bank of mountains." The error at p. 257, now corrected, was mine.
229. A contact who knows the area in Lausanne has told me that the Castle of Chillon can’t be seen from Rosemont, and that Dickens must have confused it with something else in those early days. "A long stretch of mountains blocks the view of Chillon, and it only becomes visible when you're about six miles from Lausanne on the Vevay road, where a curve in the road or the lake reveals it behind the mountain range." The mistake on page 257, which is now fixed, was my fault.
247. "Clinking," the right word, replaces "drinking."
247. "Clinking," the right word, replaces "drinking."
263. A passage which stood in the early editions is removed, the portrait which it referred to having been not that of the lady mentioned, but of a relative bearing the same name.
263. A passage that appeared in the early editions has been removed, as the portrait it referred to was not of the mentioned lady, but of a relative with the same name.
267, 268. I quote a letter to myself from one of the baronet's family present at the outbreak goodnaturedly exaggerated in Mr. Cerjat's account to Dickens. "I well remember the dinner at Mr. Cerjat's alluded to in one of the letters from Lausanne in your Life of Dickens. It was not however our first acquaintance with the 'distinguished writer,' as he came with his family to stay at a Pension on the border of the Lake of Geneva where my father and his family were then living, and notwithstanding the gallant captain's 'habit' the families subsequently became very intimate."
267, 268. I’m quoting a letter to myself from one of the baronet's family who was present when it all started, humorously exaggerated in Mr. Cerjat's account to Dickens. "I clearly remember the dinner at Mr. Cerjat's mentioned in one of the letters from Lausanne in your Life of Dickens. However, that wasn’t our first encounter with the 'distinguished writer,' as he came with his family to stay at a pension by Lake Geneva, where my father and his family were living at the time. Despite the gallant captain's 'habit,' the families later became very close."
270. Lord Vernon is more correctly described as the fifth Baron, who succeeded to the title in 1835 and died in 1866 in his 64th year.
270. Lord Vernon is more accurately referred to as the fifth Baron, having taken on the title in 1835 and passing away in 1866 at the age of 64.
P. 341, second line from bottom. Not "subsequent" but "modified" is the proper word.
P. 341, second line from bottom. Not "subsequent" but "modified" is the right word.
398. In mentioning the painters who took an interest in the Guild scheme I omitted the distinguished name of Mr. E. M. Ward, R.A., by whom an admirable design, taken from Defoe's life, was drawn for the card of membership.
398. While discussing the painters who were interested in the Guild scheme, I overlooked the notable name of Mr. E. M. Ward, R.A., who created an excellent design inspired by Defoe's life for the membership card.
468. I did not mean to imply that Lady Graham was herself a Sheridan. She was only connected with the family she so well "represented" by being the sister of the lady whom Tom Sheridan married.
468. I didn't mean to suggest that Lady Graham was a Sheridan. She was only related to the family she so effectively "represented" as the sister of the woman Tom Sheridan married.
The incident at Mr. Hone's funeral quoted at pp. 31-33 from a letter to Mr. Felton written by Dickens shortly after the occurrence (2nd of March, 1843), and published, a year before my volume, in Mr. Field's Yesterdays with Authors (pp. 146-8), has elicited from the "Independent clergyman" referred to a counter statement of the alleged facts, of which I here present an abridgement, omitting nothing that is in any way material. "Though it is thirty years since . . . several who were present survive to this day, and have a distinct recollection of all that occurred. One of these is the writer of this article—another, the Rev. Joshua Harrison. . . . The Independent clergyman never wore bands, and had no Bible under his arm. . . . An account of Mr. Hone had appeared in some of the newspapers, containing an offensive paragraph to the effect that one 'speculation' having failed, Mr. Hone was disposed, and persuaded by the Independent clergyman, to try another, that other being 'to try his powers in the pulpit.' This was felt by the family to be an insult alike to the living and the dead. . . . Mr. Harrison's account is, that the Independent clergyman was observed speaking to Miss Hone about something apparently annoying to both, and that, turning to Mr. Cruikshank, he said 'Have you seen the sketch of Mr. Hone's life in the Herald?' Mr. C.[569] replied 'Yes.' 'Don't you think it very discreditable? It is a gross reflection on our poor friend, as if he would use the most sacred things merely for a piece of bread; and it is a libel on me and the denomination I belong to, as if we could be parties to such a proceeding.' Mr. C. said in reply, 'I know something of the article, but what you complain of was not in it originally—it was an addition by another hand.' Mr. C. afterwards stated that he wrote the article, 'but not the offensive paragraph.' The vulgar nonsense put into the mouth of the clergyman by Mr. Dickens was wound up, it is said, by 'Let us pray' . . . but this cannot be true; and for this reason, the conversation with Mr. Cruikshank took place before the domestic service, and that service, according to Nonconformist custom, is always begun by reading an appropriate passage of Scripture. . . . Mr. Dickens says that while they were kneeling at prayer Mr. Cruikshank whispered to him what he relates. Mr. C. denies it; and I believe him. . . . In addition to the improbability, one of the company remembers that Mr. Dickens and Mr. Cruikshank did not sit together, and could not have knelt side by side." The reader must be left to judge between what is said of the incident in the text and these recollections of it after thirty years.
The incident at Mr. Hone's funeral mentioned on pp. 31-33 from a letter to Mr. Felton written by Dickens shortly after it happened (March 2, 1843), and published a year before my book in Mr. Field's Yesterdays with Authors (pp. 146-8), has prompted the "Independent clergyman" involved to provide a counter statement regarding the alleged facts, which I will summarize here, including everything that is material. "Although it has been thirty years since . . . several people who were present still remember clearly what occurred. One of these is the writer of this article—another, Rev. Joshua Harrison. . . . The Independent clergyman never wore bands and did not have a Bible under his arm. . . . An article about Mr. Hone had been published in some newspapers, containing an insulting paragraph suggesting that one 'speculation' having failed, Mr. Hone was encouraged by the Independent clergyman to try another, which was 'to test his abilities in the pulpit.' The family found this to be an insult to both the living and the dead. . . . According to Mr. Harrison's account, the Independent clergyman was seen talking to Miss Hone about something that seemed to annoy both of them, and then he turned to Mr. Cruikshank and asked, 'Have you seen the sketch of Mr. Hone's life in the Herald?' Mr. C.[569] responded, 'Yes.' 'Don’t you think it’s very discreditable? It reflects poorly on our poor friend, as if he would use the most sacred things just for a bit of money; and it’s a libel on me and my denomination, as if we could be involved in such a thing.' Mr. C. replied, 'I know a bit about the article, but what you’re complaining about wasn’t in it originally—it was added by someone else.' Mr. C. later claimed that he wrote the article, 'but not the offensive paragraph.' The ridiculous nonsense attributed to the clergyman by Mr. Dickens supposedly ended with 'Let us pray' . . . but this cannot be true; and for this reason, the conversation with Mr. Cruikshank happened before the domestic service, and that service, according to Nonconformist tradition, always starts with a reading from the Scripture. . . . Mr. Dickens claims that while they were kneeling for prayer, Mr. Cruikshank whispered something to him, but Mr. C. denies it; and I believe him. . . . Besides the unlikelihood of it, one person present recalls that Mr. Dickens and Mr. Cruikshank did not sit together, so they couldn’t have knelt side by side." The reader must decide between what is described in the text about the incident and these recollections of it after thirty years.
At the close of the corrections to the first volume, prefixed to the second, the intention was expressed to advert at the end of the work to information, not in correction but in illustration of my text, forwarded by obliging correspondents who had been scholars at the Wellington House Academy (i. 74). But inexorable limits of space prevent, for the present, a fulfilment of this intention.
At the end of the corrections to the first volume, which are included at the beginning of the second, I intended to mention at the conclusion of the work some information, not for correction but to illustrate my text, provided by helpful correspondents who were students at the Wellington House Academy (i. 74). However, strict space limitations prevent me from fulfilling this intention for now.
Palace Gate House, Kensington,
22nd of January 1874.
[571]
Kensington Palace Gate House,
January 22, 1874.
[571]
INDEX.
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Aberdeen, reading at, iii. 234.
Actors and acting, i. 174, 175, 260, ii. 96, 103, 126-128, 176, 399, 401;
at Miss Kelly's theater, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
French, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Adams (John Quincey), i. 214, 349.
Adelphi theatre, Carol dramatized at the, ii. 96.
Africa, memorials of dead children in, iii. 293.
Agassiz (M.), iii. 389 note.
Agreements, literary, ii. 87, 88, iii. 240.
Ainsworth (Harrison), i. 118, 163, 181.
Alamode beef-house (Johnson's), i. 54.
Albany (U. S.), reading at, iii. 436 (and see 441).
Albaro, Villa Bagnerello at, ii. 113, 120;
the sirocco at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Angus Fletcher's drawing of the villa, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
English servants at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
tradespeople at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
dinner at French consul's, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
reception at the Marquis di Negri's, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Albert (Prince), i. 322 note;
at Boulogne, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Alison (Dr.), i. 258, 260.
Alison (Sheriff), ii. 391.
All the Year Round, titles suggested for, iii. 241-243;
first number of, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
success of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
difference between Household Words and __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
stories by well-known authors, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
sale of Christmas editions of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's detached papers in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
Charles Collins's papers, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
projected story for, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
new series of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
change of plan in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
Dickens's last paper in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Allan (Sir William), i. 258, 260; ii. 475.
Allonby (Cumberland), iii. 173;
landlady of the inn at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Allston (Washington), i. 331.
Amateur theatricals, i. 413-417; ii. 481; iii. 62-64.
Ambigu (Paris), Paradise Lost at the, iii. 130, 131
America, visit to, contemplated by Dickens, i. 195;
extensive knowledge of Dickens's works in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__;
eve of visit to, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
I decided to visit __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
proposed book on __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
travel plans, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
tough path to, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
first impressions of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
hotels in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__;
inns in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_6__;
Dickens's popularity in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
second impressions of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
levees in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__;
outcry against Dickens in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
[572]slavery in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__;
international copyright activism in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__;
train travel in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__;
trying climate of, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
"placed" Englishmen in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's dislike of __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
canal boat trips in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Dickens's true praise for, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Respect shown to women in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
dueling in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's view on the countryside and its people,
in 1842, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__);
in 1868, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
effect of Martin Chuzzlewit in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
the urge to listen to Dickens read, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Mr. Dolby sent to, iii, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
result of Dolby's visit, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
revisited by Dickens, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
old and new friends in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
profits of readings in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Fenianism in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
newspapers in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
planning the readings in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
nothing lasts long in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
work of Dickens's team in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the outcome of 34 readings is in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's lifestyle in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ note;
value of a vote in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
objection to people of color in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
female beauty in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
total expenses of the reading tour and profits from readings, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__);
Dickens's departure from, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
effect of Dickens's death in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Americanisms, i. 303, 327, 370, 387, 410, 414, 415.
American Notes, choicest passages of, i. 362, 363;
not as satisfying as Dickens's letters, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
in preparation, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
proposed dedication of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
rejected motto for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
suppressed intro chapter to, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Jeffrey's take on, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
big sale of, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Americans, friendly, ii. 177;
deaths of famous individuals since 1842, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
homage to Dickens by, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
French contrasted with, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Andersen (Hans), iii. 167.
Anniversary, a birthday, i. 113, 150, iii. 308, 508;
a fatal, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
Arnold (Dr.), Dickens's reverence for, ii. 150.
Arras (France), a religious Richardson's show at, iii. 273.
Art, conventionalities of, ii. 169;
limitations of, in England, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the inferiority of English compared to French, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Artists' Benevolent Fund dinner, iii. 236.
Ashburton (Lord), i. 329, 387.
Ashley (Lord) and ragged schools, i. 283;
ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
Astley's, a visit from, iii. 164, 165;
Mazeppa at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
As You Like It, French version of, iii. 132.
Atlantic, card-playing on the, i. 295, 296.
Auber and Queen Victoria, iii. 135.
Austin (Henry), i. 182;
iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
secretary to the Sanitary Commission, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Australia, idea of settling in, entertained by Dickens, iii. 185;
plan for readings in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note (idea dropped, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__).
Austrian police, the, iii. 94, 95
Authors, American, i. 319.
Authorship, disquietudes of, ii. 288, 288.
Babbage (Charles)ii. 108.
Bagot (Sir Charles), i. 412.
Balloon Club at Twickenham, i. 182 note.
Baltimore (U. S.), women of, iii. 418;
readings at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__);
[573]white and colored inmates in the Penitentiary at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Bancroft (George), i. 305, ii. 467.
Banquets, Emile de Girardin's superb, iii. 139-141.
Bantams, reduced, iii. 251.
Barham (Rev. Mr.), ii. 175, 175.
Barnaby Rudge, agreement to write, i. 135 (and see 147, 148, 161-163, 177, 225);
Dickens working on, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__;
agreement for, transferred to Chapman and Hall, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
the raven in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
constraints of weekly publication, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
close of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the story characterized, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Bartlett (Dr.) on slavery in America, i. 389.
Bath, a fancy about, iii. 451, 452
Bathing, sea, Dickens's love of, ii. 28, 56, 138.
Battle of Life title suggested for the, ii. 251 (and see 295);
contemplated abandoning, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
writing of, resumed, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
finished, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
points in the story, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Jeffrey's take on the, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
sketch of the story, II. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Dickens's comments on, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
date of the story, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
reply to criticism on, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
uncertainties regarding the third part of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
dedication of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
illustrated by Stanfield and Leech, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
serious error committed by Leech, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
dramatized, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Bayham-street, Camden town, Dickens's early life in, i. 30-42.
Beale (Mr.), a proposal from, iii. 196.
Beard (Mr. Carr), ii. 476;
on Dickens's disability, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
readings on hold, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
always present with Dickens during his final readings, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__).
Beard (Thos.), i. 92, 101, 102, iii. 256.
Beaucourt (M.), described by Dickens, iii. 99-102;
his "Property," iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
among the Putney market gardeners, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
goodness of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Bedrooms, American, i. 304, 313.
Beecher (Ward), iii. 410;
readings in his church in Brooklyn, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Beer, a dog's fancy for, iii. 217 note.
Beggars, Italian, ii. 183, 183.
Begging-letter writers, i. 228, ii. 106, 107;
in Paris, II. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Belfast, reading at, iii. 229.
Benedict (Jules), illness of, ii. 466.
Bentley (Mr.), Dickens's early relations with, i. 134, 135, 141, 147, 148, 161, 163, 224, iii. 240;
the friendly sentiment of Dickens towards, later in life, ii __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Bentley's Miscellany, Dickens editor of, i. 121;
proposal to write Barnaby Rudge, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
The editorship was transferred to Mr. Ainsworth, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Berwick, Mary (Adelaide Procter), iii. 495
Berwick-on-Tweed, reading at, iii. 266.
Betting-men at Doncaster, iii. 174-176.
Beverley (William), at Wellington-house academy, i. 84.
Birds and low company, iii. 251, 252
Birmingham, Dickens's promise to read at, iii. 56;
promise fulfilled (first public readings), iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
another reading at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's speeches at the Institute at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
Birthday associations, i. 113, 150, iii. 308, 508
Black (Adam), i. 259.
Black (Charles), ii. 476.
Black (John), i. 100, ii. 104;
early appreciation of Dickens, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
dinner to, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Blacking-warehouse (at Hungerford Stairs), Dickens employed at, i. 50;
described, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note);
associates of Dickens at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
[574]moved to Chandos Street, Covent Garden, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens departs, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
what happened to the business, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Blackmore (Edward), Dickens employed as clerk by, i. 87;
his memories of Dickens, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Blackpool, Dickens at, iii. 455.
Blackwood's Magazine and Little Dorrit, iii. 163.
Blair (General), iii. 424.
Blanchard (Laman). ii. 162, 175 (and see 187);
a Literary Fund dinner mentioned in i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Bleak House begun, ii. 441;
originals of Boythorn and Skimpole in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
worse than Copperfield, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
handling of character in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
defects of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dean Ramsay on, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
originals of Chancery abuses in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
proposed titles for, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
completion of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
sale of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Blessington (Lady), lines written for, ii. 52 note (and see 93).
Blind Institution at Lausanne, inmates of, ii. 235, 240, iii. 78.
Bonchurch, Dickens at, ii. 425-436;
effect of climate of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
entertainment at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note.
Books, written and unwritten, hints for, iii. 275-297;
suggested titles in Memoranda for new, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
a full list of Dickens's works, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Booksellers, invitation to, ii. 100 note.
Boots, absurdity of, i. 314.
Boots, a gentlemanly, at Calais, i. 136;
a patriotic Irish person, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Boots at the Holly-tree Inn, iii. 154;
reading of, in Boston (U.S.), iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Bores, American, i. 375, 376, 383, 384, 385.
Boston (U. S.), first visit to, i. 300-309;
enthusiastic reception at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
dinner at my place, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
changes in, since 1842, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
first reading in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
a memory of Christmas at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
walking match at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
audiences at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
last readings at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Bottle (Cruikshank's), Dickens's opinion of, ii. 384, 384.
Boulogne, an imaginary dialogue at, ii. 328, 329;
Dickens at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__;
the Pier at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's fondness for, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
M. Beaucourt's "Property" at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__;
sketch of M. Beaucourt, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
provision prices at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
Shakespearean performance at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
pig market at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Thackeray at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
camp at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
Prince Albert at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
illuminations at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
epidemic at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Boulogne Jest Book, iii. 65 note.
Bouquets, serviceable, iii. 137.
Bourse, victims of the, iii. 142.
Boxall (William), ii. 475, iii. 126.
Boxing-match, a, ii. 224.
Boyle (Mary), ii. 481, iii. 524.
Boys, a list of Christian names of, iii. 294, 295
Boz, origin of the word, i. 104;
fax of autograph signature, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Bradbury & Evans (Messrs.), ii. 66, 67, 68, 105, 250;
a suggestion from, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's contracts with, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__), iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
Bradford, Dickens asked to read at, iii. 61 note.
Brighton, Dickens's first visit to, i. 138;
other visits, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
theater at, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
reading at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Bride of Lammermoor (Scott's), composition of the, iii. 339, 340
British Museum reading-room, frequented by Dickens, i. 90.
[575]Broadstairs, Dickens at, i. 136, 137, 176, 204, 277-283, ii. 55, 214 note, 387-389, 405-421, 422-424, 436-441;
Nickleby finished at, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's house at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
writing *American Notes* at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
pony-chaise accident, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
smuggling at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Brobity's (Mr.) snuff-box, iii. 297.
Brooklyn (New York), scene at, iii. 411;
readings in Mr. Ward Beecher's chapel, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Brougham (Lord), in Paris, ii. 316, 317;
the "Punch people" and, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Browne (H. K.) chosen to illustrate Pickwick, i. 115;
accompanies Dickens and his wife to Flanders, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
failure of, in a Dombey illustration, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (but see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__);
sketch for Micawber, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
his sketch of Skimpole, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Browning's (R. B.) Blot on the 'Scutcheon, Dickens's opinion of, ii. 46.
Bruce (Knight), ii. 97.
Brunel (Isambard), ii. 469.
Buckingham Palace, Dickens at, iii. 508.
Buffalo (U. S.), reading at, iii. 432.
Buller (Charles), ii. 53.
Burdett (Sir Francis), advocacy of the poor, i. 250.
Burns festival, Prof. Wilson's speech at the, ii. 136.
Buss (Mr.), Pickwick illustrations by, i. 115.
Byron's (Lord) Ada, ii. 469.
It'll be fine, the revolutionary tune of, iii. 129.
Cambridge, reading at, iii. 317.
Cambridge (U. S.) and Boston contrasted, iii. 390;
the Webster murder at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Camden-town, Dickens with Mrs. Roylance at, i. 55.
Campbell (Lord), i. 322 note;
on the writings of Dickens, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ and note;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Canada, emigrants in, ii. 28, 28.
Canal-boat journeys in America, i. 358-380;
a day's routine on, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
disagreements of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
a beautiful view on board, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Cannibalism, an approach to, ii. 326.
Cannon-row, Westminster, incident at public-house in, i. 63.
Canterbury, reading at, iii. 264.
Car-driver, an Irish, iii. 225, 226 note.
Carlyle (Lord), ii. 469.
Carlisle (Bishop of) and Colenso, iii. 248 note.
Carlyle (Thomas), ii. 110, 135, 160, 162, 174;
a weird and vulgar story, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
on international copyright, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Dickens's admiration for, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
a correction for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
on Dickens's performance, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
grand teaching of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
inaugural address at Edinburgh University, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
hint to ordinary people, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
on humor, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
a hero to Dickens, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
upon Dickens's death, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__).
Carlyle (Mrs.), on the expression in Dickens's face, i. 119;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's final meeting, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Carriage, an unaccommodating, ii. 232;
a wonderful, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Carrick Fell (Cumberland), ascent of, iii. 170, 171;
accident on, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Castle Spectre, a judicious "tag" to the, ii. 471.
Catholicism, Roman, the true objection to, ii. 299.
Cattermole (George), i. 181, 197, ii. 113 note;
imitation of a cabstand waterman by, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Caudle Lectures, a suggestion for the, ii. 136 note.
Cerjat (Mr.), ii. 232 (and see iii. 567), 252.
[576]Chalk (Kent), Dickens's honeymoon spent at, i. 108;
revisited, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Chambers, contemplated chapters on, i. 194.
Chamounix, Dickens's trip to, ii. 253-256;
revisited, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Egg's narrow escape at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Chancery, Dickens's experience of a suit in, ii. 97-99;
the original abuses highlighted in Bleak House, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Channing (Dr.) on Dickens, i. 302, 308, 309.
Chapman and Hall, overtures to Dickens by, i. 109;
Recommend buying the copyright for Sketches from Mr. Macrone, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
early relationships of Dickens with, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
share of copyright in Pickwick granted by, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
payments for Pickwick and Nicholas Nickleby, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Outline of Master Humphrey's Clock submitted to, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
buying Barnaby Rudge by, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's first and last publishers, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Chapman (Mr. Thomas), not the original of Mr. Dombey, ii. 107 (and see 108).
Chappell (Messrs.), agreements with, iii. 306, 309, 310;
arrangement with, for the final reading schedule, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
amount received from, for readings, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's tribute to, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__).
Charles Dickens as a Reader (Charles Kent's), iii. 236 note.
Chatham, Dickens's early impressions of, i. 23, 34;
day school in Rome Lane, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
Mr. Giles's school at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Cheeryble (Brothers) in Nickleby, originals of, i. 181.
Chester, readings at, iii. 268, 313
Chesterton (Mr.), i. 280, ii. 23.
Chicago (U. S.), monomania respecting, iii. 418.
Chigwell, inn at, i. 239.
Children, powers of observation in, i. 23, 27;
mortality rates among young people in London, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
old, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Children-farming, Dickens on, iii. 287, 288 note.
Child's History, the, finished, iii. 59.
Child's night-lights, wonders of, iii. 172.
Chillon, Castle of, ii. 229, 257, 258.
Chimes, a title found for the, ii. 143;
design for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens is working intensely on, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
first outline of the, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
effect of, on Dickens's health, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
objections to, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
finished, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
private readings at Lincoln's Inn Fields, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
Jeffrey's opinion of the __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Chimneys, the smoky, i. 221.
Chinese Junk, ii. 405-408.
Chorley (Henry), iii. 256.
Christmas, Dickens's identity with, ii. 90.
Christmas-eve and day, Dickens's accustomed walk on, iii. 517.
Christmas Carol, origin of, ii. 60;
preparation of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
sale and accounts of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Jeffrey and Thackeray on, vol. ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
message of the, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the story defined, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
dramatized at the Adelphi, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
reading for the Hospital for Sick Children, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
reading of, in Boston (U.S.), iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Thackeray's copy, bought by her Majesty, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Christmas Sketches, Dickens's, iii. 370, 371
Christmas sports, ii. 47 note.
Cicala, the, ii. 118.
Cincinnati (U. S.), i. 378;
described, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
temperance festival at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
bores at, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
[577]Circumlocution Office, the, iii. 159.
Clay (Henry), i. 348, 349;
on international copyright, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Clennam (Mrs.), in Little Dorrit, original of, iii. 277.
Cleveland (U. S.), rude reception of mayor of, i. 403.
Coachman, a Paris, ii. 332 note.
Cobham-park, i. 224, 288;
Dickens's final walk in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Cockburn (Sir Alexander), iii. 126.
Coffee-shops frequented by Dickens, i. 56.
Cogswell (Mr.), ii. 476, 476.
Coincidence, marvels of, iii. 174, 175, 524.
Col de Balme Pass, ii. 253.
Colden (David), i. 315, 316, ii. 192 note, 476.
Colenso (Bishop) and the Bishop of Carlisle, iii. 248 note.
Coleridge (Sara) on Little Nell, iii. 345 note;
on Chuzzlewit, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Collier (Payne) and Dickens in Hungerford Market, iii. 512 note.
Collins (Charles Alston), marriage of, to Kate Dickens, iii. 255;
books by, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
on Dickens's work-related add-ons, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
cover designed by, for Edwin Drood, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Collins (Wilkie), Dickens's regard for, ii. 402;
holiday trip with Dickens and Egg, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
at Boulogne, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
in Paris, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
in Cumberland, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
accident on Carrick Fell, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
tales by, in All the Year Round, vol. iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
at his brother's wedding, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Colquhoun (Mr.), i. 258.
Columbus (U. S.), levee at, i. 398.
Commercial Travellers' schools, admired by Dickens, iii. 247.
Commons, House of, Dickens's opinion of, i. 103, iii. 499.
Conjuror, a French, iii. 110-115.
Consumption, hops a supposed cure for, iii. 208.
Conversion, a wonderful, ii. 180 note.
Cooke, Mr. (of Astley's), iii. 164, 165
Cooling Castle, ruins of, iii. 206, 220
Cooling churchyard, Dickens's partiality for, iii. 221.
Copyright, international, Dickens's views on, i. 311, 318, 322, 332, 349, 360, ii. 50;
Henry Clay on, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
petition to the American Congress on, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Carlyle on, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
two obstacles to, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__);
result of agitation, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Corduroy-road, a, i. 398, 399.
Cornwall (Barry), ii. 187, iii. 27 (and see 495, 530).
Cornwall, Dickens's trip to, ii. 40-43.
Costello (Dudley), fancy sketch of, ii. 383.
Coutts, Miss (Baroness Burdett-Coutts), great regard for, ii. 58;
true friendship of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
generosity of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ (and refer to ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__).
Covent-garden theatre, Macready at, i. 140, 185;
farce written by Dickens for, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dinner at the end of Mr. Macready's management, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the editor of the Satirist hissed from the stage of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens applies for a position at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Coventry, gold repeater presented to Dickens by watchmakers of, iii. 237 (and see 562).
Crawford (Sir George), ii. 172.
Cricket on the Hearth, origin of the, ii. 201-204;
Dickens is busy, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
reading of, in Ary Scheffer's studio, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Crimean war, unpopular in France, iii. 110, 127, 143.
Cruikshank (George), illustrations by, to Sketches, i. 113;
[578]Claim regarding the origin of Oliver Twist: i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__ note (and refer to the autograph letter from Dickens, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_6__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_7__, and p. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_8__ of vol. ii.);
fancy sketch of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Dickens's views on his Bottle and Drunkard's Children, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
Cruize on Wheels (Charles Collins's), iii, 257.
Cumberland, Dickens's trip in, iii. 170-173.
Cunningham, Peter, character and life, iii. 73, 74
Curry (Mr.), ii. 125, 158, 172.
Custom-house-officers (continental), ii. 172, 173, 315.
Daily News projected, ii. 203;
concern about, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
first number of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's brief editorship, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
succeeded by the author of this book, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
Dana (R. H.), i. 304.
Danson (Dr. Henry), recollections by, of Dickens at school, i. 81-85;
letter from Dickens to, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ message.
Dansons (the), at work, iii. 166.
David Copperfield, identity of Dickens with hero of, i. 50-69; iii. 33-36;
characters and incidents in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
original of Dora in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
name found for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
dinners for celebrating, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
sale of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
titles proposed for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
progress of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Lord Lytton on, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
popularity of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
original of Miss Moucher in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
original of Mr. Micawber in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Bleak House worse than, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
a proposed opening of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
A copy of the plan created for the first issue of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
De Foe (Daniel), Dickens's opinion of, iii. 135 note;
his History of the Devil, vol. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Delane (John), ii. 469.
Denman (Lord), ii. 108.
Devonshire (Duke of) and the Guild of Literature and Art, ii. 397.
Devonshire-terrace, Dickens removes from Doughty-street into, i. 186;
Maclise's sketch of Dickens's house in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Dick, a favourite canary, iii. 117.
Dickens (John), family of, i. 22;
A small but great library of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
money issues of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
character of, described by his son, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
arrested for debt, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
legacy to, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
leaves the Marshalsea, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
on the education of his son, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
become a reporter, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Devonshire home of, described, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
death of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
his grave at Highgate, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
sayings of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
the respect his son has for, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Dickens (Fanny), ii. 206, 456, 459;
elected a student to the Royal Academy of Music, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
wins a prize there, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
illness of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
death of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
her funeral, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Dickens (Alfred), i. 223, 288; death of, iii. 258.
Dickens, Augustus, (died in America), ii. 385.
Dickens (Frederick), i. 182, 261, 288 (and see ii. 476);
narrow escape from drowning in the bay at Genoa, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
DICKENS, CHARLES, birth of, at Portsea, i. 21.
Memories of childhood in Chatham, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
relation of David Copperfield to, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__.
He wished for his biography to be written by the author of this book, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
initial description attempts, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
[579]an account of his childhood, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__).
illnesses of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__; ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_6__ note; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_7__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_8__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_9__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_10__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_11__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_12__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_13__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_14__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_15__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_16__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_17__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_18__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_19__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_20__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_21__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_22__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_23__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_24__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_25__.
clerk in a lawyer's office, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
hopeless love of, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Employed as a parliamentary reporter, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note).
his initial efforts in writing, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
his marriage, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
writes for the stage, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__).
the main impression of his life: i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__; ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__.
personal habits of: i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_6__; ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_7__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_8__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_9__; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_10__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_11__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_12__.
relationships with his illustrators: i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__; ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__.
portraits of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__.
Curious nicknames given to his children: i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note; ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ note, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__ note; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_6__ (and see i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_7__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_8__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_9__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_10__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_11__).
his ravens, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__; ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
adventures in the Highlands, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
first visit to the United States, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
domestic griefs of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
an old illness of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
an impressive stage manager, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__; ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_6__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_7__ note, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_8__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_9__.
his dogs, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ note; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__ note, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_6__.
his Will, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__).
his supporting documents, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__ note.
religious views of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__.
turning point of his career, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
writing in the Chronicle, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
a stylish drawing of his biographer, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
beach holidays of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__.
Italian travels, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__.
craving crowded streets, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__.
political opinions of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__).
I want to become an actor, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
his long walks, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ note; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__.
first wish to become a public reader, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__.
edits the Daily News, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
his home in Switzerland, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
living in Paris, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__.
underwriting figures, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__; iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__.
overwriting numbers, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
first public readings, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
revisits Switzerland and Italy, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
his birds, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
home disappointments, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__).
separation from his wife, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
purchases Gadshill Place, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
first paid Readings, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
second series of Readings, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
third series of Readings, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
revisits America, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Memoranda for stories initially noted by, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__).
his "violated letter," iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
favorite walks of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
his mom's death, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
[580]his first episode of lameness, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__ note, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_6__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_7__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_8__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_9__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_10__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_11__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_12__).
A general review of his literary works, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__.
impact of his death in America, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
last readings of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
noticeable changes in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
comparison of his early and late manuscripts, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
personal traits of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
his interview with the Queen, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
tension and excitement at the final readings at St. James's Hall, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
last days at Gadshill, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
A heartfelt thank you for his books, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
general mourning for, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
burial at Westminster Abbey, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
uninvited mourners at the grave, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Dickens (Mrs.), i. 108, 135, 252, 264, 273, 287, 290, 294, 299, 304, 313, 318, 336, 344, 348, 349, 373, 375, 387, 397, 403, 404, 411, 413-415, ii. 140, 149, 163, 165, iii. 113;
reluctance to leave England, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
an admirable traveler, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Maclise's portrait of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the separation, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.)
Dickens (Charles, jun.), i. 257, 331, ii. 179;
birth of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
illness of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
education of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
marriage of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Dickens (Mary), birth of, i. 149 (and see ii. 471, iii. 561).
Dickens (Kate), birth of, i. 186 (and see ii. 470);
illness of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
marriage of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Dickens (Walter Landor), death of, i. 250 (and see iii. 300, 301).
Dickens (Francis Jeffrey), birth of, ii. 61.
Dickens (Alfred Tennyson), ii. 215.
Dickens (Lieut. Sydney), death of, at sea, ii. 369 note.
Dickens (Henry Fielding), birth of, ii. 462;
acting of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
scholarship at Cambridge awarded to, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__).
Dickens (Edward Bulwer Lytton), birth of, iii. 54.
Dickens (Dora Annie), birth of, ii. 487;
death of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
her grave at Highgate, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Dickens in Camp (Bret Harte's), i. 215, 216.
Dilke (Charles Wentworth), i. 47, 48;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Dilke (Sir Charles), ii. 437.
Disraeli (Mr.), iii. 537.
Doctors, Dickens's distrust of, ii. 433.
Doctors' Commons, Dickens reporting in, i. 92 (and see ii. 219, iii. 39).
Doctor Marigold's Prescriptions, large sale of, ii. 87 note;
Dickens's faith in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
how it's written, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
success of the reading of, in New York, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Dogs, Dickens's, ii. 24, 25, 134 note, iii. 144 note, 217-220, 222;
impact of his sudden lameness on, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Dolby (Miss), ii. 475.
Dolby, Mr. (Dickens's manager) sent to America, iii. 320;
troubles of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__;
the most disliked man in America, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
care and kindness of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
commission received by, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Dombey and Son, original of Mrs. Pipchin in, i. 55, ii. 355;
begun at Rosemont, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens working on, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__;
general idea for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
hints for artist, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
[581]a reading of the first number of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
big sale of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__);
a number in writing, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
cleaner's opinion of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
plan of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
progress of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
artist aspirations for Mr. Dombey, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
passage of original MS. omitted, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
a reading of the second number of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__);
Jeffrey on, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ and remember, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
characters in, and supposed originals of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__);
profits of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
translated into Russian, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Doncaster, the race-week at, iii. 174-176;
a "groaning phantom" at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Dora, a real, i. 92, 93;
changed to Flora in Little Dorrit, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
D'Orsay (Count) and Roche the courier, ii. 204 note;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Doughty-street, Dickens removes to, i. 119;
incident of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Dover, Dickens at, iii. 54, 55;
reading at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
storm at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Dowling (Vincent), i. 101.
Dramatic College, Royal, Dickens's interest in the, iii. 236.
Dream, a vision in a, ii. 148-150 (and see iii. 522-524);
President Lincoln's, vol. iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Drunkard's Children (Cruikshank's), Dickens's opinion of, ii. 410, 410.
Drury-lane theatre, opening of, ii. 30.
Dublin, Dickens's first impressions of, iii. 225;
funny conversations at Morrison's hotel in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
reading in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__).
Duelling in America, i. 396.
Dumas (Alexandre), tragedy of Kean by, ii. 127 (and see iii. 491 note);
his Christine, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
a dinner with, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Dundee, reading at, iii. 233.
Du Plessis (Marie), death of, ii. 333.
Dyce (Alexander), ii. 473.
Eden in Martin Chuzzlewit, original of, i. 363, 369;
a worse swamp than, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Edinburgh, public dinner in, to Dickens, i. 249-262;
presentation of freedom of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
wassail bowl after Carol reading, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
readings at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, and __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__ note;
Scott monument at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Editorial troubles and pleasures, iii. 493.
Editors, American, incursion of, i. 300.
Education, two kinds of, i. 89;
Dickens's speeches on, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Edwin Drood, clause inserted in agreement for, iii. 461 note;
sale of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
amount paid for, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
first fancy for, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the story as Dickens envisioned it, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Longfellow on, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
merits of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
copy of part of the final page of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
an unpublished scene for, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
original of the opium-eater in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
a reading of several, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Egg (Augustus), fancy sketch of, ii. 383;
holiday trip with Dickens and Wilkie Collins, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
narrow escape at Chamounix, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Electric message, uses for an, iii. 282.
Eliot (George), Dickens's opinion of her first book, ii. 47.
Elliotson (Dr.), i. 270, ii. 109, 109.
Elton (Mr.), Dickens's exertions for family of, ii. 55.
Elwin (Rev. Whitwell), allusion to, ii. 462.
Emerson (Ralph Waldo), ii. 476.
[582]Emigrants in Canada, ii. 28, 28.
Emigration schemes, Dickens's belief in, ii. 262.
Emmanuel (Victor), visit of, to Paris, iii. 127.
Englishmen abroad, ii. 223, 252, 266-271.
Engravings, Dickens on, ii. 167, 168 note.
Evening Chronicle, sketches contributed by Dickens to, i. 105.
Evenings of a Working-man (John Overs'), ii. 109.
Every Man in his Humour, private performances of, at Miss Kelly's theatre, ii. 209, 211 (and see iii. 537).
Examiner, articles by Dickens in the, i. 185.
Executions, public, letter against, ii. 479.
Exeter, reading at, iii. 224.
Eye-openers, iii. 409.
Copies:
of a letter written in his childhood by Dickens, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
of the autograph signature "Boz," i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
of New York invitations to Dickens, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
of letter to George Cruikshank, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
of plan created for the first issues of Copperfield and Little Dorrit, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
of part of the last page of Edwin Drood, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
of Oliver Twist, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Fairbairn (Thomas), letter of Dickens to, on posthumous honours, iii. 487.
Fatal Zero (Percy Fitzgerald's), iii. 495.
Faucit (Helen), ii. 475.
Fechter (Mr.), châlet presented by, to Dickens, iii. 211, 212;
Dickens's friendly relations with __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Feline foes, iii. 117, 118
Felton (Cornelius C.), i. 304, 315, 320, ii. 192 note;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ memo.
Fenianism in Ireland, iii. 316, 317 note;
in America, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__).
Fermoy (Lord), iii. 522.
Fêtes at Lausanne, ii. 246, 246.
Fiction, realities of, iii. 346-363.
Field (Kate), Pen Photographs by, iii. 236 note.
Fielding (Henry), real people in novels of, iii. 22;
episodes introduced by, in his novels, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dr. Johnson's view on, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
M. Taine's view on, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Fields (James T.), Yesterdays with Authors by, ii. 42 note;
on Dickens's health in America, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
at Gadshill, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Fiesole, Landor's villa at, ii. 189 note.
Fildes (S. L.), chosen to illustrate Edwin Drood, iii. 467.
Finality, a type of, ii. 408.
Finchley, cottage at, rented by Dickens, ii. 51.
Fine Old English Gentleman, political squib by Dickens, i. 278, 279.
Fireflies in Italy, ii. 196, and note.
Fires in America, frequency of, iii. 399, 400
Fitzgerald (Percy), iii. 218;
a contributor in All the Year Round, vol. iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
personal preference for Dickens, for, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
"Fix," a useful word in America, i. 370.
Flanders, Dickens's trip to, i. 135.
Fletcher, (Angus), i. 254, 263, 274;
stay of, with Dickens at Broadstairs, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
anecdotes of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ note, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__ (and see ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_6__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_7__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_8__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_9__ note);
pencil sketch by, of the Villa Bagnerello at Albaro, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
death of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Flies, plague of, at Lausanne, ii. 244, 245 note.
Fonblanque (Albany), i. 113, ii. 53, 162;
[583]wit of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
Footman, a meek, ii. 194.
Fortescue (Miss), ii. 96.
Fortnightly Review, Mr. Lewes's critical essay on Dickens in, iii. 332-338.
Fowls, eccentric, iii. 251, 252
Fox (William Johnson), ii. 53.
Fox-under-the-hill (Strand), reminiscence of, i. 62.
Franklin (Lady), iii. 519.
Fraser (Peter), ii. 475.
Freemasons' Hall, banquet to Dickens at, iii. 324.
Freemasons' secret, a, ii. 440.
Free-trade, Lord "Gobden" and, ii. 312.
French and Americans contrasted, ii. 322.
Frescoes, perishing, ii. 119;
at the Palazzo Peschiere, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Maclise's, for the Houses of Parliament, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Friday, important incidents of Dickens's life connected with, ii. 441, iii. 205, 419, &c.
Frith (W. P.), portrait of Dickens by, iii. 238.
Funeral, scene at a, ii. 31-33;
an English, in Italy, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Furnival's inn, room in, where the first page of Pickwick was written, iii, 528.
Gadshill Place, a vision of boyhood at, i. 24 (and see iii. 204);
Dick's tomb at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
first description of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
sketch of porch at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
purchase of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
antecedents of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
improvements and additions at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
sketch of chalet at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
nightingales at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's daily life at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
sketch of the house and conservatory, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Study at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
games for the villagers, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Dickens's final days at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Gambler's Life, Lemaitre's acting in the, iii. 122-124.
Gamp (Mrs.), original of, ii. 51;
a great example of English humor, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
with the Strollers, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Gaskell (Mrs.), ii. 454, 470, iii. 54.
Gasman's compliment to Dickens, iii. 265 (and see 441).
Gautier (Théophile), ii. 331.
Geneva, Dickens at, ii. 288;
revolution at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
aristocracy of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Genoa described, ii. 125-128;
theaters at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ note);
religious institutions at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
rooms in the Palazzo Peschiere rented by Dickens, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
view from, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Governor's levee at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
an English funeral at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
nautical incident at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
revisited by Dickens, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
George Silverman's Explanation, iii. 380 (and see 253 note).
Gibson (Milner), ii. 468.
Gilbert Massenger (Holme Lee's) remarks of Dickens on, iii. 493, 494
Giles (William), i. 23;
Dickens at the school run by, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
snuff box given to "Boz" by __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Gipsy tracks, iii. 250.
Girardin (Emile de), iii. 142;
Banquets held in honor of Dickens, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Girls, American, i. 384, 385 note;
Irish, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ memo;
list of Christian names of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Gladstone (Mr.), and Dickens, i. 103, iii. 537.
Glasgow, proposed dinner to Dickens at, i. 276;
reading at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens at Athenæum meeting, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Glencoe, Pass of, i. 268, 271;
effect of, on Dickens, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Goldfinch, the, and his friend, iii. 252.
[584]Gondoliers at Venice, habits of, iii. 90.
Gordon (Lord George), character of, i. 241.
Gordon (Sheriff), ii. 475.
Gore-house, a party at, ii. 334 note.
Gower-street-north, school in, opened by Dickens's mother, i. 43;
a dull home, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
home broken up, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Graham (Sir James), ii. 109.
Graham (Lady), ii. 468.
Grant (James), recollections of Dickens by, i. 101 (and see 108).
Graves, town, iii. 49, 52 note;
Dickens's aversion to giving speeches at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Great Expectations, original of Satis-house in, iii. 220;
germ of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the story characterized, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
close of, changed at Bulwer Lytton's suggestion, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, and note.
Great Malvern, cold-waterers at, ii. 487.
Greek war-ship, a, iii. 82.
Greeley (Horace), iii. 400, 442;
on the impact of Dickens's death in America, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
on Dickens's reputation as a novelist, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
a suggestion from, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Grey (Lord), recollection of, ii. 264, 264.
Grimaldi, Life of, edited by Dickens, i. 142;
the editor's humble estimate of it, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
criticisms of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Grip, Dickens's raven, i. 220;
death of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, 235;
apotheosis, by Maclise, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
a second Grip, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Grisi (Madame), ii. 176.
Guild of Literature and Art, origin of, ii. 395;
the generous assistance of the Duke of Devonshire to, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__).
Hachette (MM.), agreement with, for French translation of Dickens's works, iii. 125 note.
Haghe (Louis), iii. 85.
Haldimand (Mr.), seat of, at Lausanne, ii, 232.
Halévy (M.), dinner to, ii. 469.
Halifax, the "Britannia" aground off, i. 297;
the house of assembly at, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Hall (Mr. and Mrs. S. C.), ii. 475.
Hall (William), funeral of, ii. 369.
Hallam (Henry), loquacity of, ii. 251.
Halleck (Fitz-Greene) on Dickens, iii. 482 note.
Halliday (Andrew), iii. 529.
Hamlet, an emendation for, ii. 389;
performance at Preston, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Hampstead Heath, Dickens's partiality for, i. 133, ii. 101.
Hampstead-road, Mr. Jones's school in the, i. 74.
Hansard (Mr.), letter from, concerning Mr. Macrone, ii. 442, 443 note.
Hardwick (John), ii. 468.
Hard Times, proposed names for, iii. 65, and note;
title chosen, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
written for Household Words, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Ruskin's view on, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Harley (Mr.), ii. 475.
Harness (Rev. Wm.), ii. 162, 175, 473.
Harrogate, reading at, iii. 230.
Harte (Bret), Dickens on, i. 214;
tribute to Dickens, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Hartford (U. S.) levee at, i. 313.
Harvard and Oxford crews, the, iii. 527.
Hastings, reading at, iii. 264.
Hatton-garden, Dickens at, iii. 25.
Haunted Man, first idea of, ii. 280;
big sale of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
dramatized, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
teachings and the moral of the story, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
the baptism dinner, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Hawthorne (N.), Dickens on, ii. 440.
Hayes (Catherine), ii. 468.
[585]Heaven, ambition to see into, ii. 477.
Helps (Arthur), iii. 245;
In Memoriam by, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Hereditary transmission, iii. 179 note (and see 493).
Highgate, Dora's grave at, ii. 493, iii. 52.
Highlands, Dickens's adventures in the, i. 263-276.
Hogarth, Dickens on, ii. 413, 413.
Hogarth (George), i. 105;
Dickens marries the eldest daughter of __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Hogarth (Georgina), ii. 120, iii. 540, 541, 561, 563;
sketch taken from, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Maclise's portrait of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Hogarth (Mary), death of, i. 120;
Epitaph on the tomb of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note (and see ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
Dickens's fond recollection of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_6__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_7__.
Holiday Romance and George Silverman's Explanation, high price paid for, iii. 380 (and see 253 note, and 321).
Holland (Lady), a remembrance of, ii. 194.
Holland (Lord), ii. 190.
Holland (Captain), the Monthly Magazine conducted by, i. 104.
Holyhead, a Fenian at, iii. 316 note.
Hone of the Every Day Book, scene at funeral of, ii. 31-33 (but see iii. 568, 569).
Honesty under a cloud, ii. 112.
Hood (Thomas), ii. 190; his Tylney Hall, ii. 264.
Hop-pickers, iii. 208.
Horne (R. H.), ii. 475.
Hospital for Sick Children, Dickens's exertions on behalf of, iii. 192-200;
a small patient at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Carol reading for, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Hotels, American, i.304, iii. 390, 395, 412, 435;
extortion at, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Houghton (Lord), ii. 472, iii. 509, 538
Household Words in contemplation, ii. 449-453;
title selected for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
names proposed for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
first number of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
early contributors to, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Mrs. Gaskell's story in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
unwise printed statement in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
discontinued, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__).
Hudson (George), glimpse of, in exile, iii. 274.
Hugo (Victor), an evening with, ii. 331, 331.
Hulkes (Mr.), iii. 206 note, 256.
Hull, reading at, iii. 232.
Humour, Americans destitute of i. 401;
a favorite part of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the main quality of Dickens, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Lord Lytton on the use of, by novelists, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
Dickens's enjoyment of his own, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
the true province of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Hungerford-market, i. 50 (and see iii. 512 note).
Hunt (Holman), iii. 257.
Hunt (Leigh), saying of, i. 119;
on *Nicholas Nickleby*, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Civil-list pension awarded to, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
theater fundraiser for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
result of performances, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
last look at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
letter from Dickens for self-defense, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the original of Harold Skimpole in Bleak House, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Inauguration of the bust of __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ at Kensal Green, iii.
Hunted Down, high price paid for, iii. 253;
original of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Creative life, tenure of, iii. 187.
Improprieties of speech, ii. 269.
Incurable Hospital, patients in the, iii. 287.
Inimitable, as applied to Dickens, origin of the term, i. 33.
Inn, a log-house, i. 400.
Innkeeper, a model, i. 365.
Inns, American, Miss Martineau on, i. 344 (and see 366 note, 393, 395, 400, iii. 432);
[586]Highland, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
Italian, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__.
International boat-race dinner, Dickens at, iii. 527.
Ireland, a timely word on, ii. 260.
Irving (Washington), i. 287, 315, 330, 351, 352, 357 note;
letter from Dickens to, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
a terrible public speaker, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
at the Literary Fund dinner in London, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
at Richmond (U.S.), i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Italians hard at work, ii. 197.
Italy, art and pictures in, ii. 167-169, iii. 91, 92;
private galleries in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
cruelty to animals in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
wayside memorials in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
best season, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
fireflies in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's trip to, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
the most honorable men, in exile, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Jack Straw's Castle (Hampstead-heath), i. 133, 299, 346, ii. 101, 101.
Jackson (Sir Richard), i. 413.
Jeffrey (Lord), i. 260;
praise of Little Nell by, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
presides at a dinner in Edinburgh for Dickens, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
on the American Notes, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
praise from the Carol, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
on the Chimes, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
his opinion on the Battle of Life, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
forecast of Dombey by, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
on Paul's death, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
on the character of Edith in Dombey, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
James Sheridan Knowles and, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
touching letter from ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
death of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Jerrold (Douglas), ii. 136, 162, 175, 200;
at Miss Kelly's theater, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
fancy sketch of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
last meeting with Dickens, vol. iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
proposed memorial tribute to, and result, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Jesuits at Geneva, rising against the, ii. 297-301 (and see 179-180).
Johnson (President), interview of Dickens with, iii. 423;
impeachment of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Johnson (Reverdy), at Glasgow art-dinner, iii. 453 note.
Jonson (Ben), an experience of, ii. 352.
Jowett (Dr.), on Dickens, iii. 525, 526
Karr (Alphonse), ii. 331.
Keeley (Mrs.), ii. 475;
in Nicholas Nickleby, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Kelly (Fanny), theatre of, in Dean-street, Soho, ii. 208-214;
whims and fancies of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Kemble (Charles) and his daughters, ii. 473.
Kemble (John), ii. 473.
Kensal-green, Mary Hogarth's tomb at, i. 120 note, ii. 458 note.
Kent (Charles), Charles Dickens as a Reader by, iii. 235 note;
letter to, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Kissing the Rod (Edmund Yates'), iii. 495.
Knebworth, private performances at, ii. 396, 397;
Dickens at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Knight (Charles), ii. 475.
Knowles (James Sheridan), bankruptcy of, ii. 392;
civil-list pension awarded to, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
fundraising performances for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Women, American, i. 327;
eccentric, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Laing (Mr.), of Hatton Garden, iii. 25.
Lamartine (A., de), ii. 331, iii. 135.
Lameness, strange remedy for, i. 22.
Lamert (James), private theatricals got up by, i. 31;
takes young Dickens to the theater, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
hires Dickens at the blacking warehouse, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
[587]argument between John Dickens and __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__).
Lamplighter, Dickens's farce of the, i. 183, ii. 207;
turned into a story for the benefit of Mrs. Macrone, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Landor (Walter Savage), Dickens's visit to, at Bath, i. 200;
mystification of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
villa in Fiesole, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ note);
the original of Boythorn in Bleak House, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
a fancy respect, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Forster's Life of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Landport (Portsea), birth of Dickens at, i. 21.
Landseer (Charles), ii. 475.
Landseer (Edwin), i. 181, ii. 162, 470, 475, iii. 63 note, 126;
and Napoleon III., iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note (and see iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__).
Land's-end, a sunset at, ii. 40.
Lankester (Dr.), ii. 430.
Lant-street, Borough, Dickens's lodgings in, i. 59;
the landlord's family is depicted in the Garlands in Old Curiosity Shop, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Lausanne, Dickens's home at, ii. 225, 226;
booksellers' shops at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the town described, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
view of Rosemont, II. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
girl drowned in the lake at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
theater at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
fêtes at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__;
marriage at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
revolution at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
prison at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Blind Institution at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
English colony at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
plague of flies at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
earthquake at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
women's smoking party, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the town revisited, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Lawes (Rev. T. B.), club established by, at Rothamsted, iii. 244.
Layard (A. H.), iii. 83;
at Gadshill, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Lazy Tour projected, iii. 170 (and see 351).
Lazzaroni, what they really are, ii. 187.
Leech (John) at Miss Kelly's theatre, ii. 210;
serious error in the Battle of Life illustration, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
fancy sketch of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's view of his Rising Generation, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
what he will be remembered for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
accident at Bonchurch, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
at Boulogne, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__).
Leeds, reading at, iii. 232.
Leeds Mechanics' Society, Dickens at meeting of the, ii. 390, 390.
Legends and Lyrics (Adelaide Procter's), iii. 495 note.
Legerdemain in perfection, iii. 112-114 (and see 111, 112 note).
Leghorn, Dickens at, iii. 80, 81
Legislatures, local, i. 365.
Lehmann (Frederic), iii. 218, 256
Leigh (Percival), ii. 210.
Lemaitre (Frédéric), acting of, iii. 122-124 (and see 521).
Lemon (Mark), ii. 210, 211, 263;
fancy drawing of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
working with kids, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Lemon (Mrs.), ii. 263.
Leslie (Charles Robert), iii. 126.
Letter-opening at the General Post-Office, ii. 108, 108.
Levees in the United States, i. 313, 347, 365, 373, 386, 398;
queer customers at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
what they're like, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Lever (Charles), tale by, in All the Year Round, iii. 245.
Lewes (George Henry), Dickens's regard for, ii. 475;
A critical essay on Dickens in the Fortnightly Review highlighted, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Library, a gigantic, ii. 272, 272.
Life of Christ, written by Dickens for his children, ii. 241 note.
Life-preservers, i. 376.
Lighthouse, Carlyle on Dickens's acting in the, iii. 72.
[588]Lincoln (President), curious story respecting, iii. 422, 423 (and see 508).
Lincoln's-inn-fields, a reading of the Chimes in, ii. 162, 174, 175.
Linda, Dickens's dog, iii. 218, 219;
burial site of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Liston (Robert), ii. 475.
Literary Fund dinner, i. 321 (and see iii. 488).
Literature, too much "patronage" of, in England, iii. 488.
Littérateur, a fellow, ii. 325.
Little Dorrit, fac-simile of plan prepared for first number of, iii. 158;
sale of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
general design of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
weak points in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Von Moltke and, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
original of Mrs. Clennam in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
notions for, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Little Nell, Florence Dombey and, ii. 362;
Sara Coleridge on, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ memo.
Liverpool, readings at, iii. 225, 268, 311, 313;
Dickens's speech at the Mechanics' Institution at ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Leigh Hunt's benefit at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
public dinner for Dickens, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
Loch-earn-head, postal service at, i. 269.
Locock (Dr.), ii. 468.
Lodi, Dickens at, ii. 166-173.
Logan Stone, Stanfield's sketch of, ii. 42.
London, pictures of, in Dickens's books, i. 171;
readings in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__.
Longfellow (Henry Wadsworth), i. 304, 331, iii. 447;
among London thieves and homeless people, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
at Gadshill, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
on Dickens's death, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Longman (Thomas), ii. 469.
Louis Philippe, a glimpse of, ii. 320;
dethronement of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Lovelace (Lord), ii. 468.
Lowther, Mr. (chargé d'affaires at Naples), difficulty in finding house of, iii. 83-85.
Lytton (Lord), ii. 188 (and see iii. 246);
Prologue written by, for Ben Jonson's play, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
Dickens's admiration for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
his opinion of Copperfield, vol. iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Strange Story was featured in All the Year Round, vol. iii, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's response to objections from, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
defense by, of humorists, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
suggestion for the ending of Great Expectations, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Letter from Dickens, sent from Cambridge (U.S.), iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Lytton (Robert), iii. 127.
Mackenzie (Dr. Shelton) and Cruikshank's illustrations to Oliver Twist, i. 155 note;
rigmarole about Dickens and Her Majesty, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note.
Maclise (Daniel), i. 261, ii. 160, 175, 200;
portrait of Dickens by, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
social charm of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
his elevation of Grip, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
his play scene in Hamlet, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
among London homeless, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
sketches in Cornwall by, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
letter from the Cornwall trip, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
his "Girl at the Waterfall," ii, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
paints Mrs. Dickens's portrait, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Pencil drawing of Charles Dickens, his wife, and her sister, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's address to, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
sketch of the private reading at Lincoln's Inn Fields, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
House on Devonshire Terrace sketched by, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
tribute of Dickens to, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Macmillan's Magazine, paper in, on Dickens's amateur theatricals, iii. 63 note.
Macrae (David), Home and Abroad by, iii. 483 note.
Macready (William Charles), i. 261, 287, 288, ii. 160, 177;
at Covent Garden, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
dinner to celebrate his retirement from management, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
dinner before the American visit, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
[589]a captured disservice to, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
in New Orleans, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
in Paris, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
strange news for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
anecdote of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
Dickens's love for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
farewell dinner for __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
at Sherborne, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
his view on the Sikes and Nancy scenes, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens' misgivings about, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Macready (Mrs.), death of, iii. 55.
Macrone (Mr.), copyright of Sketches by Boz sold to, i. 107;
plan to reissue Sketches, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
excessive demand by, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ note;
end of dealings with, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
a friendly request for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Magnetic experiments, i. 375, 376.
Malleson (Mr.), iii. 256.
Malthus philosophy, ii. 262.
Managerial troubles, ii. 210, 370, 400-402.
Manby (Charles), pleasing trait of, iii. 273.
Manchester, Dickens's speech at opening of Athenæum, ii. 56 (and see iii. 237);
Leigh Hunt's benefit at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Guild dinner at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
readings at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__.
Manchester (Bishop of) on Dickens's writings, iii. 383, 384 note.
Manin (Daniel), iii. 126.
Mannings, execution of the, ii. 479.
Manon Lescaut, Auber's opera of, iii. 136.
Mansion-house dinner to "literature and art," ii. 477;
doubtful compliment at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
suppressed letter from Dickens regarding, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Marcet (Mrs.), ii. 231, 231.
Margate theatre, burlesque of classic tragedy at, ii. 26 (and see ii. 387).
Mario (Signor), ii. 176.
Marryat (Captain) on the effect in America of the Nickleby dedication, ii. 54;
affection for children, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__).
Marshalsea prison, Dickens's first and last visits to the, i. 44, 45, iii. 162;
an incident in, described by Dickens, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__).
Marston's (Mr. Westland) Patrician's Daughter, prologue to, ii. 45.
Martineau (Harriet) on American inns, i. 344, 366 note.
Martin Chuzzlewit, agreement for, i. 282 (and see ii. 24, 65);
original of Eden in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
fancy for the opening of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__);
first year of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
names first given to, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Sydney Smith's opinion on the first number of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
origin of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
original of Mrs. Gamp in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
sale of, fewer than previous books, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__);
unlucky clause in the agreement for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's own opinion of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
the story defined, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Thackeray's favorite scene in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
intended motto for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
M. Taine on, II. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
christening dinner, II. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Sara Coleridge on, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ memo.
Master Humphrey's Clock, projected, i. 193-199;
first sale of, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
first number published, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
original plan scrapped, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
dinner to celebrate, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Clock frustrations, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Mazzini (Joseph), Dickens's interest in his school, ii. 474.
Mediterranean, sunset on the, ii. 117.
Mémoires du Diable, a pretty tag to, iii. 133, 134
Memoranda, extracts from Dickens's book of, iii. 275-297;
available names in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Mendicity Society, the, ii. 106.
Mesmerism, Dickens's interest in, i. 279, 280, 375, ii. 436.
[590]Micawber (Mr.), in David Copperfield, original of, iii. 30-32;
comparison between Harold Skimpole and, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Mr. G. H. Lewes on, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
on corn, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Middle Temple, Dickens entered at, i. 183, 186.
Midsummer Night's Dream at the Opera Comique, Boulogne, iii. 103.
Milnes (Monckton), ii. 472.
Mirror of Parliament, Dickens reporting for, i. 97.
Mississippi, the, i. 386.
Mitton (Thomas), i. 182, ii. 476.
Moltke (Von) and Little Dorrit, iii. 164.
Money (Lord Lytton's), a performance of, at Doncaster, iii. 175 note.
Mont Blanc, effect of, on Dickens, ii. 254.
Montreal, private theatricals in, i. 414, 417;
facsimile of playbill at, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Moore (George), business qualities and benevolence, iii. 248.
Moore (Thomas), i. 251, 321.
Morgue at Paris, ii. 321;
a tenant of the, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Morning Chronicle, Dickens a reporter for the, i. 97;
liberality of owners, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
change of editorship of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
articles by Dickens in the, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Morris (Mowbray), ii. 468.
Moulineaux, Villa des, iii. 97-105, 115-119.
Mountain travelling, ii. 253.
Mr. Nightingale's Diary, the Guild farce of, ii. 397, iii. 72.
Mrs. Lirriper's Lodgings, iii. 370.
Mugby Junction, germ of, in Memoranda, iii. 290.
Mule-travelling in Switzerland, ii. 253.
Mulgrave (Lord), i. 297, 300, 305, 413, ii. 469.
Mumbo Jumbo, ii. 440.
Murray (Lord), i. 260, ii. 475.
Music, effect of, on a deaf, dumb, and blind girl, ii. 239;
vagrant, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Names, available, iii. 295, 296
Naples, burial place at, ii. 186 note;
filth of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
Dickens at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Napoleon III. at Gore-house, ii. 334 note;
at Boulogne, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
at Paris, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
Edwin Landseer and, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Nautical incident at Genoa, ii. 195.
Neaves (Mr.), i. 258.
Negri (Marquis di), ii. 130-132.
New Bedford (U.S.), reading at, iii. 437.
Newcastle, readings at, iii. 264, 315;
alarming scene at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Newhaven (U. S.), levee at, i. 313.
New Sentimental Journey (Collins's), iii. 257.
Newspaper express, a, i. 101.
Newspapers, American, iii. 400.
Newsvendors' dinner, Dickens at, iii. 535.
New-year's day in Paris, iii. 145.
New York, fac-similes of invitations to Dickens, i. 308, 309;
the Carlton Hotel in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
ball at, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
life in, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
hotel charges in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
public institutions poorly managed at, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
prisons in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
capital punishment in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Ticket sales for the readings, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
first reading in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
fire at the Westminster Hotel, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
massive growth since Dickens's last visit, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Niblo's Theatre at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
sleigh driving at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
police of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
the Irish part in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
farewell readings in, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
public dinner to Dickens at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
New York Herald, i. 320, iii. 400.
New York Ledger, high price paid for tale by Dickens in, iii. 253.
[591]New York Tribune, Dickens's "violated letter" in the, iii. 201, 231
Niagara Falls, effect of, on Dickens, i. 404, 405 (and see iii. 433).
Nicholas Nickleby, agreement for, i. 145;
first number of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
sale of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the Saturday Review on, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
characters in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Opinions of Sydney Smith and Leigh Hunt on, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Dickens working on, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
dinner celebration of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
originals of the Brothers Cheeryble in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Announcement on the night before publication, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
effect of, in establishing Dickens, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__).
Nicolson (Sir Frederick), ii. 194.
Nightingales at Gadshill, iii. 212.
Nobody's Fault, the title first chosen for Little Dorrit, iii. 155.
No-Popery riots, description of the, i. 246.
Normanby (Lord), ii. 108, 109, 320.
Norton (Charles Eliot), iii. 215, 447
Norwich, reading at, iii. 262.
No Thoroughfare, i. 140.
Novels, real people in, iii. 22-33;
episodes in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Novelists, old, design for cheap edition of, ii. 385.
Nugent (Lord), ii. 473.
"Ocean Ghost," the, ii. 369 note.
O'Connell (Daniel), ii. 135.
Odéon (Paris), Dickens at the, iii. 128, 129
Ohio, on the, i. 377.
Old Curiosity Shop, original of the Marchioness in, i. 59;
originals of the Garland family, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
original of the poet in Jarley's waxwork, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the story began, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
disadvantages of weekly publishing, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
changes in proofs, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dick Swiveller and the Marchioness, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
effect of the story on the writer, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
death of Little Nell, ch. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
end of the story, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
success of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
characterized, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
a tribute by Bret Harte, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
characters in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Old Monthly Magazine, Dickens's first published piece in, i. 97;
other sketches in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Oliver Twist, commenced in Bentley's Miscellany, i. 121;
characters in, real to Dickens, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
the story described, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__;
Dickens working on, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the final chapter of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the Cruikshank illustrations to, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
reputation of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
reply to attacks against, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
teaching of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
"adapted" for the stage, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
noted in the Quarterly Review, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
copyright of, repurchased, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
original of Mr. Fang, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
character drawing in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
proposed reading from, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
copy of a section of the manuscript of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Opium-den, an, iii. 528 (and see 464 note).
Osnaburgh-terrace, Dickens in, ii. 106.
Our Mutual Friend, title chosen for, iii. 271;
hints for Memoranda, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
first idea for, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
original of Mr. Venus in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Marcus Stone has been selected as the illustrator, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the story reviewed, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Ouvry (Frederic), iii. 434, 539;
clause added by, in agreement for Edwin Drood, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
humorous letter from Dickens to, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Overs (John), Dickens's interest in, ii. 109;
death of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Over-work, remains of, ii. 297.
[592]Owen (Prof.), ii. 477.
Artworks, Dickens on, ii. 167-169.
Paradise Lost at the Ambigu, Paris, iii. 130, 131
Paris, Dickens's first day in, ii. 316;
Sunday in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's house in, described, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
unhealthy political signs at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
the Morgue at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
incident on the streets of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
hard frost at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's unsettling neighbor, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
begging letter writers in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
sightseeing at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
theaters at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Royal Library, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the Praslin tragedy in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's life in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Dickens's house in, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
personal attention to Dickens, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
theaters of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
illumination of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
New Year's Day in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
results of imperial improvement in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
Art Expo at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
a Duchess murdered in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Parliament, old Houses of, inconvenience of the, i. 100.
Parr (Harriet), iii. 494 note.
Parry (John), ii. 475.
Pawnbrokers, Dickens's early experience of, i. 46.
Peel (Sir Robert) and his party, i. 277;
Lord Ashley and, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the Whigs and, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Pen Photographs (Miss Field's) iii. 235 note.
Perth, reading at, iii. 234.
Peschiere, Palazzo (Genoa), rooms in the, hired by Dickens, ii. 129;
a fellow tenant in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
described, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
view of the, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
revisited, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
dinner party at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
owner of the, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Petersham, athletic sports at, i. 183.
Phelps (Mr.), ii. 475.
Philadelphia, Dickens at, i. 335-344;
penitentiary located at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
letters from, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__).
Pickwick Papers, materials for, i. 66;
first number of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
origin of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Seymour's illustrations to, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
Thackeray's offer to illustrate, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
the debtor's prison in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
popularity of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__);
reality of characters in __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
worse than later books, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Mr. Pickwick is an enduring character, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
piracies of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
completion of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
payments for, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
a holy brother of St. Bernard and, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
characters in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
where it started, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Pictures from Italy, original of the courier in, ii. 171-173;
The publication started in the Daily News, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Pic Nic Papers published, i. 241.
"Piljians Projiss," a new, ii. 376-384.
Pig-market at Boulogne, iii. 104.
Pipchin (Mrs.) in Dombey, original of, i. 55, ii. 355, 356;
various names suggested for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Pirates, literary, ii. 97;
proceedings in Chancery against, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
warning to, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ notice.
Pisa, a jaunt to, iii, 81.
Pittsburg (U. S.), description of, i. 373;
solitary confinement at, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Poets, small, iii. 489.
Pollock (Chief Baron) on the death of Dickens, iii. 247 note.
Poole (John), aid rendered to, by Dickens, ii. 370;
civil-list pension granted to, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Poor, Dickens's sympathy with the, i. 167, 168 (and see 250), ii. 146, 147, 240.
Popularity, distresses of, i. 324.
Porte St. Martin (Paris), Dickens at the, iii. 129.
Portland (U. S.) burnt and rebuilt, iii. 438.
[593]Portrait painter, story of a, iii. 523.
Portsea, birth of Dickens at, i. 21.
Prairie, an American, i. 393, 394;
pronunciations of the word, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Praslin tragedy in Paris, ii. 386.
Prayer, Dickens on personal, iii. 485.
Preston, a strike at, iii. 69, 70;
Hamlet Act III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Primrose (Mr.), i. 258.
Printers' Pension fund dinner, presided over by Dickens, ii. 55.
Prisons, London, visits to, i. 280;
American, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__;
comparison of systems pursued in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Procter (Bryan Waller), iii. 27, 28;
Dickens's love for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Procter (Adelaide), Dickens's appreciation of poems by, iii. 495.
Publishers, hasty compacts with, i. 121;
Dickens's agreements with, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__).
Publishers, authors and, ii. 64, 72, iii. 489, 490
Puddings, a choice of, i. 55, 56.
"Punch people," Lord Brougham and the, ii. 469;
at Mansion House dinner, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Q, Dickens's secretary in the United States, i. 303, 315, 322, 328, 344, 348, 366, 370, 374, 375, 393, 397, 400, 411;
described, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ note).
Quarterly Review, prophecy in not fulfilled, i. 139 note;
notice of Oliver Twist in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
on Cruikshank and Leech, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Queen (Her Majesty the) and Auber, iii. 134, 135;
alleged offers to Dickens, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, and __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ note;
desire to see Dickens perform, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Thackeray's copy of the Carol was bought by, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
Dickens's interview with, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
grief over Dickens's death, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Rachel (Madame), caprice of, iii. 137.
Ragged schools, Dickens's interest in, ii. 57;
results of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note (and refer to ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
proposed paper by Dickens, rejected by Edinburgh Review, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Railroads, American, ladies' cars on, i. 338.
Railway travelling, effect on Dickens, iii. 450;
in America, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_5__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_6__.
Ramsay (Dean) on Bleak House and Jo, iii. 47, 48
Ramsgate, entertainments at, ii. 214 note.
Raven, death of Dickens's first, i. 235-239;
of second, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Raymond (George), ii. 476.
Reade (Charles), Hard Cash contributed by, to All the Year Round, iii. 245.
Readings, gratuitous, iii. 61 note;
private, in Scheffer's studio, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
in Lincoln's Inn Fields, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
public, Dickens's initial thoughts about, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
argument against paid, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
idea of, revived, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
opinions on, asked and provided, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
disadvantages of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
proposal from Mr. Beale regarding, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
first rough notes regarding, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
various managers hired by Dickens, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
hard work required by, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
study given to, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
first series of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
sale of books of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
subjects of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
second series of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
what it consisted of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
new subjects for, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
third series of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Messrs. Chappell's involvement with, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
American, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
[594]result of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Readings given by Dickens:
Australian, contemplated, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note (but see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
Bulwer's opinion, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
last series of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ note).
Readings (alphabetical list of):
Aberdeen, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Albany, USA, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
receipts at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Baltimore (U.S.), iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
receipts at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Belfast, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Berwick-upon-Tweed, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Birmingham, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Boston, USA, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
receipts at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Brighton, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Brooklyn, NY, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
receipts at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Buffalo, NY, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
receipts at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Cambridge, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Canterbury, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Chester, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Dover, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Dublin, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
Dundee, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Edinburgh, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, and __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__ note.
Exeter, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Glasgow, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Harrogate, vol. iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Hartford, CT, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Liverpool, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__.
London, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__.
Manchester, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__.
New Bedford, USA, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
receipts at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Newcastle, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Newhaven, USA, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
receipts at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
New York, 3. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
receipts at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Norwich, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Paris, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Perth, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Philadelphia (U.S.), iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
receipts at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Portland, USA, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
receipts at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Providence, RI, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
receipts at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Rochester, NY, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
receipts at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Springfield, U.S., iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Syracuse (U.S.), iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
receipts at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Torquay, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Washington (U.S.), iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
receipts at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Worcester, MA, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
York, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Reeves (Sims), ii. 475.
Reformers, administrative, iii. 70, 71 note.
Regiments in the streets of Paris, iii. 143 note.
Regnier (M.) of the Français, ii. 330, 429, iii. 127, 137
Rehearsals, troubles at, ii. 371.
Religion, what is the true, ii. 149.
Reporters' gallery, Dickens enters the, i. 96;
disconnects from __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Reporter's life, Dickens's own experience of a, i. 99-101 (and see ii. 265).
Revolution at Geneva, ii. 298-301;
traces left by, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
abettors of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Rhine, Dickens on the, ii. 222, 223;
traveling Englishmen on the, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Richard Doubledick, story of, iii. 154.
Richardson (Sir John), iii. 519.
Richardson's show, a religious, iii. 273.
Richmond (U. S.), levees at, i. 354.
Rifle-shooting, Lord Vernon's passion for, ii. 270;
at Lausanne, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__.
Rising Generation (Leech's), Dickens on, ii. 414-418.
Ristori (Mad.) in Medea, iii. 137.
Roberts (David), iii. 85.
Robertson (Peter), i. 259, ii. 135, 475;
[595]sketch of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Robertson (T. W.), iii. 530, 531
Robinson Crusoe, Dickens's opinion of, iii. 135 note (and see i. 264 note).
Roche (Louis), employed by Dickens as his courier in Italy, ii. 106;
resources of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_4__);
Count d'Orsay and, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
illness of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
death of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Rochester, early impressions of, i. 28 (and see iii. 213);
Watts's Charity at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Rochester Castle, adventure at, ii. 22.
Rochester Cathedral, brass tablet in, to Dickens's memory, iii. 154 note.
Rochester (U. S.), alarming incident at, iii. 431.
Rockingham-castle, Dickens's visit to, ii. 481-483;
private performances at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Rocky Mountain Sneezer, a, iii. 409.
Rogers (Samuel), i. 251, ii. 190;
sudden illness of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note).
Rome, Dickens's first impressions of, ii. 185;
Dickens at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
a "scattering" party at the Opera at iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
marionettes at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
malaria at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Rosemont (Lausanne), taken by Dickens, ii. 225;
view of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's neighbors at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
Dombey started at, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the landlord of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Rothamsted, Rev. Mr. Lawes's club at, iii. 244.
Royal Academy dinner, Dickens's last public words spoken at, iii. 537.
Roylance (Mrs.), the original of Mrs. Pipchin in Dombey, i. 55, ii. 355.
Ruskin (Mr.) on Hard Times, iii. 66, 67
Russell (Lord J.), a friend of letters, ii. 369, 393;
on Dickens's letters, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
dinner with, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's tribute to, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, and note.
Ryland (Arthur), letter of Dickens to, iii. 56 note.
Room (G. A.), Dickens's opinion of, ii. 454 note;
tribute to Dickens's memory, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Salisbury Plain, superiority of, to an American prairie, i. 394;
a ride over, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Sand (Georges), iii. 138, 139
Sandusky (U. S.), discomforts of inn at, i. 400.
Sardinians, Dickens's liking for, iii. 92.
Satirist, editor of, hissed from the Covent-garden stage, ii. 50.
Saturday Review on the realities of Dickens's characters, i. 166.
Scene-painting, iii. 166.
Scheffer (Ary), portrait of Dickens by, iii. 148, 149;
reading of Cricket on the Hearth in the studio of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Scheffer (Henri), iii. 150.
Schools, public, Dickens on, iii. 236.
Scotland, readings in, iii. 232-235.
Scott (Sir W.), real people in novels of, iii. 22, 29
Scott monument at Edinburgh, ii. 392.
Scribe (M.), dinner to, ii. 469;
social interaction of Dickens with, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
author anxieties, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
a great actor lost in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Scribe (Madame), iii. 136.
Sea-bathing and authorship, ii. 28.
Seaside holidays, Dickens's, ii. 403-441, iii. 97-120.
Sebastopol, reception in France of supposed fall of, iii. 110.
Serenades at Hartford and Newhaven (U. S.), i. 314.
[596]Servants, Swiss, excellence of, ii. 246.
Seven Dials, ballad literature of, i. 230.
Seymour (Mr.) and the Pickwick Papers, i. 111 note;
death of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Shaftesbury (Lord) and ragged schools, i. 283, ii. 57, 58 note, 493, 494 (and see 494).
Shakespeare Society, the, i. 185.
Shakespeare on the actor's calling, iii. 191.
Shakespeare's house, purchase of, ii. 392.
Sheffield, reading at, iii. 232.
Sheil (Richard Lalor), ii. 53.
Shepherd's-bush, the home for fallen women at, ii. 488.
Sheridans (the), ii. 468.
Ship news, i. 296.
Short-hand, difficulties of, i. 91.
Shows, Saturday-night, i. 61.
Siddons (Mrs.), genius of, ii. 473, 473.
Sierra Nevada, strange encounter on the, iii. 385, 386
Sikes and Nancy reading, proposed, iii. 448;
at Clifton, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Macready on the, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
at York, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, and note;
Dickens's pulse after, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Simplon, passing the, ii. 174.
"Six," Bachelor, iii. 124.
Sketches by Boz, first collected and published, i. 113;
characterized, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Slavery in America, i. 327, 352-354, 388-390;
the ghost of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Slaves, runaway, i. 389.
Sleeplessness, Dickens's remedy for, iii. 249.
Sleighs in New York, iii. 397.
"Slopping round,"iii. 432.
"Smallness of the world," i. 372, ii. 222, iii. 204.
Small-pox, American story concerning, iii. 305 note.
Smith (Albert), Battle of Life dramatized by, ii. 323.
Smith (Arthur), iii. 168;
the first series of Dickens's readings managed by __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (and refer to __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ note);
distresses of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
first part of the second series planned by, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
serious illness of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
touching moment at funeral, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Smith (Bobus), ii. 190.
Smith (O.), acting of, i. 174, ii. 96.
Smith (Porter), ii. 476.
Smith (Southwood), ii. 53, 53.
Smith (Sydney), i. 311, ii. 108;
on *Nicholas Nickleby*, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
death of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Smithson (Mr.), i. 182;
death of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Smoking party, a feminine, ii. 292, 292.
Smollett (Tobias), a recollection of, i. 128;
real people in novels of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Snuff-shop readings, ii. 336.
Solitary confinement, effects of, i. 345, 346, ii. 234, 234.
Somebody's Luggage, the Waiter in, iii. 351, 370
Sortes Shandyanæ, ii. 242.
Sparks (Jared), i. 304.
Speculators, American, iii. 391, 393, 408, 409, 411, 428.
Spiritual tyranny, ii. 231 note.
Spittoons in America, i. 338.
Squib Annual, the, i. 109, 110.
St. Bernard, Great, proposed trip to, ii. 271;
ascent of the mountain, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the convent, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
scene at the top, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
bodies discovered in the snow, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the convent is a tavern in everything but name, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's idea of writing a book about the, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
St. George (Madame), ii. 176.
St. Giles's, Dickens's early attraction of repulsion to, i. 39;
The original of Mr. Venus can be found in iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
St. Gothard, dangers of the, ii. 198, 198.
[597]St. James's Hall, Dickens's final readings at, iii. 532, 533
St. Leger, Dickens's prophecy at the, iii. 175.
St. Louis (U. S.), levee at, i. 386;
slavery at, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
beautiful scene at, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
dueling in, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Stage-coach, queer American, i. 363, 364.
Stage, training for the, ii. 213, 214, (and see iii. 191).
Stanfield (Clarkson), i. 181, ii. 47 note, 160, 162, 175, iii. 521;
sketches in Cornwall by, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
illustrations by, to Battle of Life, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
The price obtained at the Dickens sale for the Lighthouse scenes, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note (and see ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__);
at work, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Stanfield Hall, Dickens at, ii. 462
Stanley (Dr. A. P.), Dean of Westminster, compliance with general wish, iii. 543;
letter and sermon, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Stanton (Secretary), curious story told by, iii. 422, 423 (and see 508).
Staplehurst accident, iii. 304;
effect on Dickens, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Staples (J. V.), letter from Dickens to, ii. 90 note.
Statesmen, leading American, i. 349, 350.
State Trials, story from the, iii. 283, 284
Stealing, Carlyle's argument against, i. 333.
Steamers, perils of, i. 293, 305, 326, 331 (and see iii. 80-83).
Stevenage, visit to the hermit near, iii. 246.
Stirling (Mr.), a theatrical adapter, i. 174.
Stone (Frank), ii. 385. iii. 105;
sketch of Sydney Dickens by, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note;
fancy sketch of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Stone (Marcus), designs supplied by, to Our Mutual Friend, iii. 373 note.
Streets, Dickens's craving for crowded, ii. 144, 151, 277, 281, 282, 283, 287, iii. 515.
Strange Gentleman, a farce written by Dickens, i. 116.
Stuart (Lord Dudley), ii. 472.
Sue (Eugène), ii. 331.
Sumner (Charles), i. 305, iii. 421, 426
Sunday, a French, ii. 317, 485 note.
Swinburne (Algernon), ii. 428.
Switzerland; splendid scenery of, ii. 198;
villages in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens decides to write a new book in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
first thoughts on, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
climate of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
the people of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__;
mule travel in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Protestant and Catholic cantons in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's final days in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
autumn vibes, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
revisited, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Syme (Mr.), opinion of, as to Dickens's lameness, iii. 453, 454
Syracuse (U. S.), reading at, iii. 431.
Tagart (Edward), ii. 59, 59.
Taine (M.), on Martin Chuzzlewit, ii. 78;
criticisms of Dickens, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_3__);
a hint for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
on Hard Times, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
Fielding criticized by, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Tale of Two Cities, titles suggested for, iii. 279;
first mention of Carton in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__);
origin of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
the story reviewed, III. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
titles suggested for, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Talfourd (Judge), i. 180, ii. 97, 98, 293, 294, 427, 470 (and see iii. 509);
Dickens's love for, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Tatler (Hunt's), sayings from, iii. 26 note.
Tauchnitz (Baron), letter from, iii. 57 note;
[598]conversation with Dickens, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note (and see __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ note).
Tavistock-house, sketch of, iii. 54;
a scene outside, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Stanfield scenes at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
sale of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Startling message from the servant at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Taylor (Tom), ii. 472.
Taylor (the Ladies), ii. 271.
Telbin (William), at work, iii. 166.
Temperance agitation, Dickens on the, ii. 409, 409.
Temperature, sudden changes of, in America, i. 347.
Temple (Hon. Mr.), ii. 190.
Tennent (Sir Emerson), ii. 476, iii. 80;
death and funeral of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Tennyson (Alfred), Dickens's allegiance to, ii. 25, 136, 472, iii. 357 note.
Ternan (Ellen Lawless), iii. 561.
Tête Noire Pass, ii. 255;
accident in, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Thackeray (W. M.), ii. 188;
offers to illustrate Pickwick, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
on Maclise's portrait of Dickens, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
on the Carol, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and see ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__);
dinner to, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
at Boulogne, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note;
in Paris, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
tribute to, by Dickens, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
estrangement between Dickens and __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Thanet races, Dickens at the, ii. 24.
Théâtre Français (Paris), conventionalities of the, iii. 128.
Theatres, Italian, ii. 182;
French, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Theatrical Fund dinner, Dickens's speech at, ii. 491, 492 (and see 221, iii. 537).
Theatricals, private, at Montreal, i. 413-415;
at Rockingham, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
at Tavistock House, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__ (also refer to ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__).
Thomas (Owen P.), recollections of Dickens at school, i. 76-81.
Thompson (Mr. T. I.), ii. 476.
Thompson (Sir Henry), consulted by Dickens, iii. 321;
a reading of Dickens's was interrupted, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
view on Dickens's lameness, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Ticknor (George), i. 304, 308.
Ticknor & Fields (Messrs.), commission received by, on the American readings, iii. 446.
Timber Doodle (Dickens's dog), ii. 24, 25, 28, ii. 134 note;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Times, the, on Dickens's death, iii. 542, 543 note.
Tintoretto, Dickens on the works of, ii. 168, iii. 92.
Titian's Assumption, effect of, on Dickens, ii. 168.
Tobin (Daniel), a schoolfellow of Dickens, i. 76;
helps Dickens as a secretary but was eventually let go, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Toole (J. L.), encouragement given to in early life, by Dickens, iii. 54 (and see iii. 302 note).
Topping (Groom), i. 220, 221, 234, 235, 413.
Toronto, toryism of, i. 412.
Torquay, readings at, iii. 268, 451
Torrens (Mrs.), ii. 476.
Tour in Italy (Simond's), ii. 116 note.
Townshend (Chauncy Hare), iii. 256;
death and inheritance of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Tracey (Lieut.), i. 280, ii. 23.
Tramps, ways of, iii. 210 note, 249, 250.
Tremont House (Boston, U. S.), Dickens at, i. 300.
Trossachs, Dickens in the, i. 264.
True Sun, Dickens reporting for the, i. 96.
Turin, Dickens at, iii. 92, 93
Turner (J. M. W.), ii. 110.
Tuscany, wayside memorials in, ii. 188 note.
Twickenham, cottage at, occupied by Dickens, i. 180-182;
visitors at, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
childish fun at, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Twiss (Horace), ii. 468.
Tyler (President), i. 350.
[599]Tynemouth, scene at, iii. 315, 316
Uncommercial Traveller, Dickens's, iii. 247-253.
Uncommercial Traveller Upside Down, contemplated, iii. 270.
Undercliff (Isle of Wight), Dickens's first impressions of, ii. 426;
the depressing effect of the climate of, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Unitarianism adopted by Dickens for a short time, ii. 59.
Upholsterer, visit to an, i. 189;
visit from an, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Up the Rhine (Hood's), Dickens on, i. 185.
Utica (U. S.), hotel at, iii. 435.
Vauxhall, the Duke and party at, ii. 470.
Venice, Dickens's impressions of, ii. 163-166, iii. 90;
habits of gondoliers at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
theater at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Verdeil (M.), ii. 233.
Vernet (Horace), iii. 147 note.
Vernon (Lord), eccentricities of, ii. 270, 271, 298.
Vesuvius, Mount, iii. 83.
Viardot (Madame) in Orphée, iii. 138 note.
Village Coquettes, the story and songs for, written by Dickens, i. 116.
Vote, value of a, in America, iii. 420.
Wales, Prince of, and Dickens, iii. 509.
Wainewright (the murderer), recognized by Macready in Newgate, i. 184 (and see ii. 334 note);
made the subject of a story in the New York Ledger, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Portrait of a girl by, ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note (and see ii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__).
Wales, North, tour in, i. 184.
Ward (Professor) on Dickens, iii. 352, 353 note.
Washington (U. S.), hotel extortion at, i. 345;
climate of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Congress and Senate at, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
a funny dog reading at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
readings at, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Wassail-bowl presented to Dickens at Edinburgh, iii. 197.
Waterloo, Battle of, at Vauxhall, ii. 470.
Watson, Mr. (of Rockingham), ii. 231, 264, 479;
death of, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Watson (Sir Thomas), note by, of Dickens's illness in April, 1869, iii. 457-459;
readings paused, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
limited approval granted for extra readings, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ (and refer to __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_2__ note);
Dickens's letter to, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note.
Watts's Charity at Rochester, iii. 154 note.
Webster (Daniel), Dickens on, i. 308.
Webster (Mr.), ii. 475.
Webster murder at Cambridge (U. S.), iii. 402, 403
Well-boring at Gadshill, iii. 209.
Weller (Sam) a pre-eminent achievement in literature, i. 131.
Wellington, Duke of, fine trait of, ii. 264.
Wellington House Academy (Hampstead-road), Dickens a day-scholar at, i. 74-84;
described in Household Words, vol. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
Dickens's school friends at, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__-__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
Beverley painting scenes at __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__;
revisited after 25 years, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Weyer (M. Van de), ii. 477.
Whig jealousies, i. 250 (and see ii. 261).
Whitechapel workhouse, incident at, iii. 75.
White-conduit-house, reminiscence of, ii. 132.
Whitefriars, a small revolution in, ii. 302.
White (Rev. James), character of, ii. 424-426 (and see ii. 426, iii. 126).
[600]White (Grant) on the character of Carton in the Tale of Two Cities, iii. 359, 360
Whitehead (Charles), i. 109.
Whitworth (Mr.), ii. 475.
Wieland the clown, death of, iii. 166 note.
Wig experiences, ii. 380.
Wilkie (Sir David), on the genius of Dickens, i. 178;
death of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Willis (N. P.), fanciful description of Dickens by, i. 107 note.
Wills (W. H.), ii. 453, iii. 256, 493
Wilson (Professor), i. 259;
sketch of, i. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__, __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__;
speeches of, I. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ note, II. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_1__.
Wilson (Mr.) the hair-dresser, fancy sketch of, ii. 379-383.
Wilton (Marie) as Pippo in the Maid and Magpie, iii. 236, 237 note.
Women, home for fallen, ii. 488 (and see iii. 286).
Wordsworth, memorable saying of, iii. 381.
Worms, the city of, ii. 223.
Yarmouth first seen by Dickens, ii. 462.
Yates (Edmund), tales by, in All the Year Round, iii. 245;
Dickens's interest in, iii. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__.
Yates (Mr.), acting of, i. 174, ii. 96.
Yesterdays with Authors (Fields'), ii. 42 note.
York, readings at, iii. 231, 454
Yorkshire, materials gathered in, for Nickleby, i. 172.
Young Gentlemen and Young Couples, sketches written by Dickens for Chapman & Hall, i. 149 note.
Zoo Gardens, feeding the serpents at, iii. 169 note.
Zouaves, Dickens's opinion of the, iii. 143, 144
FOOTNOTES:
[1] "I shall cut this letter short, for they are playing Masaniello in the drawing-room, and I feel much as I used to do when I was a small child a few miles off, and Somebody (who, I wonder, and which way did She go, when she died) hummed the evening hymn to me, and I cried on the pillow,—either with the remorseful consciousness of having kicked Somebody else, or because still Somebody else had hurt my feelings in the course of the day." From Gadshill, 24 Sept. 1857. "Being here again, or as much here as anywhere in particular."
[1] "I'll keep this letter short because they’re performing Masaniello in the living room, and I feel something like I did when I was a small child a few miles away, and Someone (I wonder who, and where did She go when she died) hummed the evening hymn to me, and I cried into the pillow—either because I felt guilty for kicking Someone else or because Someone else had hurt my feelings earlier in the day." From Gadshill, 24 Sept. 1857. "Being here again, or as much here as anywhere else in particular."
[2] "The mistress of the establishment holds no place in our memory; but, rampant on one eternal door-mat, in an eternal entry long and narrow, is a puffy pug-dog, with a personal animosity towards us, who triumphs over Time. The bark of that baleful Pug, a certain radiating way he had of snapping at our undefended legs, the ghastly grinning of his moist black muzzle and white teeth, and the insolence of his crisp tail curled like a pastoral crook, all live and flourish. From an otherwise unaccountable association of him with a fiddle, we conclude that he was of French extraction, and his name Fidèle. He belonged to some female, chiefly inhabiting a back parlor, whose life appears to us to have been consumed in sniffing, and in wearing a brown beaver bonnet."—Reprinted Pieces, 287. (In such quotations as are made from his writings, the Charles Dickens Edition will be used.)
[2] "The owner of the place doesn't stick in our memory; instead, there's a puffed-up pug dog, who has a personal grudge against us, living on an endless door mat in a long, narrow entryway, defying Time. The bark of that menacing Pug, his annoying habit of snapping at our unprotected legs, the creepy grin from his moist black snout and white teeth, and the arrogance of his tightly curled tail that looks like a shepherd's crook, all remain vivid in our minds. From a strange connection we have with him and a fiddle, we've concluded that he was French, and his name was Fidèle. He belonged to some woman who mostly stayed in the back parlor, and it seems her life was all about sniffing and wearing a brown beaver bonnet."—Reprinted Pieces, 287. (In such quotations as are made from his writings, the Charles Dickens Edition will be used.)
[4] The reader will forgive my quoting from a letter of the date of the 22d April, 1848. "I desire no better for my fame, when my personal dustiness shall be past the control of my love of order, than such a biographer and such a critic." "You know me better," he wrote, resuming the same subject on the 6th of July, 1862, "than any other man does, or ever will." In an entry of my diary during the interval between these years, I find a few words that not only mark the time when I first saw in its connected shape the autobiographical fragment which will form the substance of the second chapter of this biography, but also express his own feeling respecting it when written: "20 January, 1849. The description may make none of the impression on others that the reality made on him. . . . Highly probable that it may never see the light. No wish. Left to J. F. or others." The first number of David Copperfield appeared five months after this date; but though I knew, even before he adapted his fragment of autobiography to the eleventh number, that he had now abandoned the notion of completing it under his own name, the "no wish," or the discretion left me, was never in any way subsequently modified. What follows, from the same entry, refers to the manuscript of the fragment: "No blotting, as when writing fiction; but straight on, as when writing ordinary letter."
[4] The reader will forgive my quoting from a letter dated April 22, 1848. "I desire nothing more for my fame, once my personal messiness is no longer under the control of my love for order, than such a biographer and critic." "You know me better," he wrote, continuing the same topic on July 6, 1862, "than any other man does, or ever will." In an entry from my diary during the time between these years, I find a few words that not only mark the moment when I first saw the autobiographical fragment taking shape, which will make up the second chapter of this biography, but also capture his own feelings about it when it was written: "January 20, 1849. The description might not have the same impact on others that the reality had on him. . . . It’s very likely that it may never be published. No desire. Left to J. F. or others." The first issue of David Copperfield was published five months after this date; but even before he turned his autobiographical fragment into the eleventh issue, I knew that he had now given up the idea of finishing it under his own name. The "no desire," or the discretion left to me, was never changed in any way after that. What follows from the same entry refers to the manuscript of the fragment: "No blotting, like when writing fiction; just straightforward, like when writing an ordinary letter."
[5] The reader will probably think them worth subjoining. Dr. Danson wrote: "April, 1864. Dear Sir, On the recent occasion of the U. C. H. dinner, you would probably have been amused and somewhat surprised to learn that one of those whom you addressed had often accompanied you over that 'field of forty footsteps' to which you so aptly and amusingly alluded. It is now some years since I was accidentally reading a paper written by yourself in the Household Words, when I was first impressed with the idea that the writer described scenes and persons with which I was once familiar, and that he must necessarily be the veritable Charles Dickens of 'our school,'—the school of Jones! I did not then, however, like to intrude myself upon you, for I could hardly hope that you would retain any recollection of myself; indeed, it was only barely possible you should do so, however vividly I might recall you in many scenes of fun and frolic of my school-days. I happened to be present at the dinner of Tuesday last (being interested as an old student in the school of the hospital), and was seated very near you; I was tempted during the evening to introduce myself to you, but feared lest an explanation such as this in a public room might attract attention and be disagreeable to yourself. A man who has attained a position and celebrity such as yours will probably have many early associates and acquaintances claiming his notice. I beg of you to believe that such is not my object, but that having so recently met you I feel myself unable to repress the desire to assure you that no one in the room could appreciate the fame and rank you have so fairly won, or could wish you more sincerely long life and happiness to enjoy them, than, Dear Sir, your old schoolfellow, Henry Danson." To this Dickens replied: "Gadshill Place, Thursday, 5th May, 1864. Dear Sir, I should have assured you before now that the receipt of your letter gave me great pleasure, had I not been too much occupied to have leisure for correspondence. I perfectly recollect your name as that of an old schoolfellow, and distinctly remember your appearance and dress as a boy, and believe you had a brother who was unfortunately drowned in the Serpentine. If you had made yourself personally known to me at the dinner, I should have been well pleased; though in that case I should have lost your modest and manly letter. Faithfully yours, Charles Dickens."
[5] The reader will probably think them worth adding. Dr. Danson wrote: "April, 1864. Dear Sir/Madam, At the recent U. C. H. dinner, you would likely have been amused and a bit surprised to know that one of the people you spoke to had often accompanied you over that 'field of forty footsteps' you amusingly referred to. It’s been a few years since I was accidentally reading a paper you wrote in Household Words, and that was when I first thought the writer was describing scenes and people I once knew, and that he had to be the real Charles Dickens from 'our school'—the school of Jones! However, I didn't want to impose on you since I could hardly expect you to remember me; realistically, the chance was slim that you would, no matter how vividly I recalled you in many fun and carefree times from my school days. I happened to be at the dinner last Tuesday (being interested as an old student of the hospital school) and was seated quite close to you. I was tempted to introduce myself, but I was afraid that such an explanation in a public space might draw attention and be uncomfortable for you. A person who has achieved the position and fame you have likely has many old friends and acquaintances hoping to catch his attention. Please believe that that is not my intention, but after meeting you so recently, I feel I must express that no one in the room could appreciate the fame and status you've earned or wish you a longer life of happiness to enjoy it more sincerely than, Dear Sir, your old schoolmate, Henry Danson." To this, Dickens replied: "Gadshill Place, Thursday, 5th May, 1864. Dear Sir/Madam, I should have told you earlier that your letter brought me great joy, but I’ve been too busy to correspond. I clearly remember your name as that of an old schoolmate and have a distinct memory of your appearance and clothing as a boy. I believe you had a brother who unfortunately drowned in the Serpentine. If you had introduced yourself to me at the dinner, I would have been happy to meet you; though in that case, I would have missed your humble and sincere letter. Faithfully yours, Charles Dickens."
[6] I take other fanciful allusions to the lady from two of his occasional writings. The first from his visit to the city churches (written during the Dombey time, when he had to select a church for the marriage of Florence): "Its drowsy cadence soon lulls the three old women asleep, and the unmarried tradesman sits looking out at window, and the married tradesman sits looking at his wife's bonnet, and the lovers sit looking at one another, so superlatively happy, that I mind when I, turned of eighteen, went with my Angelica to a city church on account of a shower (by this special coincidence that it was in Huggin Lane), and when I said to my Angelica, 'Let the blessed event, Angelica, occur at no altar but this!' and when my Angelica consented that it should occur at no other—which it certainly never did, for it never occurred anywhere. And O, Angelica, what has become of you, this present Sunday morning when I can't attend to the sermon? and, more difficult question than that, what has become of Me as I was when I sat by your side?" The second, from his pleasant paper on birthdays: "I gave a party on the occasion. She was there. It is unnecessary to name Her, more particularly; She was older than I, and had pervaded every chink and crevice of my mind for three or four years. I had held volumes of Imaginary Conversations with her mother on the subject of our union, and I had written letters more in number than Horace Walpole's, to that discreet woman, soliciting her daughter's hand in marriage. I had never had the remotest intention of sending any of those letters; but to write them, and after a few days tear them up, had been a sublime occupation."
[6] I draw other fanciful references to the lady from two of his occasional writings. The first is from his visit to the city churches (written during the Dombey period, when he was choosing a church for Florence’s wedding): "Its sleepy rhythm quickly lulls the three old women to sleep, while the single tradesman gazes out the window, and the married tradesman studies his wife’s hat, and the lovers look at each other, so incredibly happy, that I remember when I, just past eighteen, went with my Angelica to a city church because of a shower (notably in Huggin Lane), and when I said to my Angelica, 'Let this blessed event, Angelica, happen at no altar but this!' and when my Angelica agreed that it should happen nowhere else—which it certainly never did, as it never happened anywhere. And O, Angelica, what has happened to you, this Sunday morning when I can’t focus on the sermon? And a more challenging question than that, what has happened to me as I was when I sat beside you?" The second is from his delightful essay on birthdays: "I threw a party for the occasion. She was there. It’s unnecessary to name her specifically; she was older than me, and she had filled every nook and cranny of my mind for three or four years. I had had countless imaginary conversations with her mother about our union, and I had written more letters than Horace Walpole to that wise woman, asking for her daughter's hand in marriage. I had never intended to send any of those letters; however, writing them and then tearing them up after a few days had become a wonderful pastime."
[7] To this date belongs a visit paid him at Furnival's Inn in Mr. Macrone's company by the notorious Mr. N. P. Willis, who calls him "a young paragraphist for the Morning Chronicle," and thus sketches his residence and himself: "In the most crowded part of Holborn, within a door or two of the Bull-and-Mouth Inn, we pulled up at the entrance of a large building used for lawyers' chambers. I followed by a long flight of stairs to an upper story, and was ushered into an uncarpeted and bleak-looking room, with a deal table, two or three chairs and a few books, a small boy and Mr. Dickens, for the contents. I was only struck at first with one thing (and I made a memorandum of it that evening as the strongest instance I had seen of English obsequiousness to employers), the degree to which the poor author was overpowered with the honor of his publisher's visit! I remember saying to myself, as I sat down on a rickety chair, 'My good fellow, if you were in America with that fine face and your ready quill, you would have no need to be condescended to by a publisher.' Dickens was dressed very much as he has since described Dick Swiveller, minus the swell look. His hair was cropped close to his head, his clothes scant, though jauntily cut, and, after changing a ragged office-coat for a shabby blue, he stood by the door, collarless and buttoned up, the very personification, I thought, of a close sailer to the wind." I remember, while my friend lived, our laughing heartily at this description, hardly a word of which is true; and I give it now as no unfair specimen of the kind of garbage that since his death also has been served up only too plentifully by some of his own as well as by others of Mr. Willis's countrymen.
[7] On this date, Mr. Macrone and the infamous Mr. N. P. Willis visited him at Furnival's Inn. Willis describes him as "a young writer for the Morning Chronicle," and paints a picture of his living situation: "In the busiest area of Holborn, just a few doors down from the Bull-and-Mouth Inn, we arrived at a large building used for lawyers' offices. I climbed a long flight of stairs to the upper floor and was led into a room that was bare and uninviting, furnished with a plain table, two or three chairs, a few books, a small boy, and Mr. Dickens. The first thing that struck me (and I made a note of it that evening as a prime example of English subservience to employers) was how the poor author seemed overwhelmed by the honor of his publisher’s visit! I remember thinking to myself, as I sat down in a wobbly chair, 'My friend, if you were in America with that charming face and your quick pen, you wouldn’t have to be treated like this by a publisher.' Dickens was dressed somewhat like he later described Dick Swiveller, minus the flashy appearance. His hair was cut close to his head, his clothes were a bit worn but stylish, and after swapping a ragged office coat for a shabby blue one, he stood by the door, collarless and buttoned up, embodying, I thought, a sailor navigating close to the wind." I recall, while my friend was alive, us having a good laugh over this description, hardly a word of which was true; and I present it now as a fair example of the kind of nonsense that, since his death, has been overly presented by some of his own countrymen as well as others of Mr. Willis's peers.
[8] Not quoted in detail, on that or any other occasion; though referred to. It was, however, placed in my hands, for use if occasion should arise, when Dickens went to America in 1867. The letter bears date the 7th July, 1849, and was Mr. Chapman's answer to the question Dickens had asked him, whether the account of the origin of Pickwick which he had given in the preface to the cheap edition in 1847 was not strictly correct. "It is so correctly described," was Mr. Chapman's opening remark, "that I can throw but little additional light on it." The name of his hero, I may add, Dickens took from that of a celebrated coach-proprietor of Bath.
[8] Not quoted in detail, on that or any other occasion; though referred to. However, it was given to me for use if needed when Dickens went to America in 1867. The letter is dated July 7, 1849, and was Mr. Chapman's response to Dickens's question about whether the account of the origin of Pickwick that he provided in the preface to the cheap edition in 1847 was completely accurate. “It is so accurately described,” Mr. Chapman’s opening remark was, “that I can shed very little additional light on it.” I should also mention that Dickens took the name of his hero from a famous coach owner from Bath.
[9] The appeal was then made to him because of recent foolish statements by members of Mr. Seymour's family, which Dickens thus contradicted: "It is with great unwillingness that I notice some intangible and incoherent assertions which have been made, professedly on behalf of Mr. Seymour, to the effect that he had some share in the invention of this book, or of anything in it, not faithfully described in the foregoing paragraph. With the moderation that is due equally to my respect for the memory of a brother-artist, and to my self-respect, I confine myself to placing on record here the facts—That Mr. Seymour never originated or suggested an incident, a phrase, or a word, to be found in this book. That Mr. Seymour died when only twenty-four pages of this book were published, and when assuredly not forty-eight were written. That I believe I never saw Mr. Seymour's handwriting in my life. That I never saw Mr. Seymour but once in my life, and that was on the night but one before his death, when he certainly offered no suggestion whatsoever. That I saw him then in the presence of two persons, both living, perfectly acquainted with all these facts, and whose written testimony to them I possess. Lastly, that Mr. Edward Chapman (the survivor of the original firm of Chapman & Hall) has set down in writing, for similar preservation, his personal knowledge of the origin and progress of this book, of the monstrosity of the baseless assertions in question, and (tested by details) even of the self-evident impossibility of there being any truth in them." The "written testimony" alluded to is also in my possession, having been inclosed to me by Dickens, in 1867, with Mr. Chapman's letter here referred to.
[9] The appeal was made to him due to recent ridiculous statements from Mr. Seymour's family, which Dickens addressed as follows: "I hesitate to respond to some vague and confusing claims made, supposedly on behalf of Mr. Seymour, suggesting he had any involvement in the creation of this book or anything in it that isn't accurately described in the previous paragraph. Out of respect for the memory of a fellow artist and for my own self-respect, I will only record the facts—Mr. Seymour never originated or suggested any incident, phrase, or word found in this book. Mr. Seymour passed away when only twenty-four pages of this book had been published, and surely not forty-eight were written. I believe I have never seen Mr. Seymour's handwriting in my life. I only met Mr. Seymour once, the night before his death, when he certainly made no suggestions whatsoever. At that time, I was with two individuals, both alive and fully familiar with these facts, and I have their written testimony. Lastly, Mr. Edward Chapman (the surviving member of the original firm of Chapman & Hall) has documented for preservation his personal knowledge of the origin and development of this book, the absurdity of the unfounded claims mentioned, and (verified by details) the obvious impossibility of any truth in them." The "written testimony" referenced is also in my possession, having been sent to me by Dickens in 1867, along with Mr. Chapman's letter mentioned here.
[10] Whether Mr. Chapman spelt the name correctly, or has unconsciously deprived his fat beau of the letter "r," I cannot say; but experience tells me that the latter is probable. I have been trying all my life to get my own name spelt correctly, and have only very imperfectly succeeded.
[10] I can't say for sure whether Mr. Chapman spelled the name right or accidentally left out the letter "r" from his overweight friend’s name, but my experience suggests it's probably the latter. I've spent my whole life trying to get my own name spelled correctly, and I've only managed to do so imperfectly.
[11] Her epitaph, written by him, remains upon a gravestone in the cemetery at Kensal Green: "Young, beautiful, and good, God numbered her among his angels at the early age of seventeen."
[11] His tribute to her is inscribed on her gravestone in the Kensal Green cemetery: "Young, beautiful, and kind, God took her among his angels at the young age of seventeen."
[12] I have a memorandum in Dickens's writing that five hundred pounds was to have been given for it, and an additional two hundred and fifty pounds on its sale reaching three thousand copies; but I feel certain it was surrendered on more favorable terms.
[12] I have a note in Dickens's handwriting that stated five hundred pounds was supposed to be paid for it, with an extra two hundred and fifty pounds once its sales reached three thousand copies; but I’m pretty sure it was actually given up on better terms.
[13] The allusion was to the supposed author of a paper in the Quarterly Review (Oct. 1837), in the course of which there was much high praise, but where the writer said at the close, "Indications are not wanting that the particular vein of humor which has hitherto yielded so much attractive metal is worked out. . . . The fact is, Mr. Dickens writes too often and too fast. . . . If he persists much longer in this course, it requires no gift of prophecy to foretell his fate:—he has risen like a rocket, and he will come down like the stick."
[13] The reference was to the supposed author of an article in the Quarterly Review (Oct. 1837), which contained a lot of praise, but the writer concluded with, "There are signs that the specific style of humor that has previously produced so much engaging content is running out. . . . The reality is, Mr. Dickens writes too frequently and too quickly. . . . If he continues down this path for much longer, it doesn’t take a prophet to predict his outcome:—he has shot up like a rocket, and he will fall back down like the stick."
[15] There is an earlier allusion I may quote, from a letter in January, for its mention of a small piece written by him at this time, but not included in his acknowledged writings: "I am as badly off as you. I have not done the Young Gentlemen, nor written the preface to Grimaldi, nor thought of Oliver Twist, or even supplied a subject for the plate." The Young Gentlemen was a small book of sketches which he wrote anonymously as the companion to a similar half-crown volume of Young Ladies (not written by him), for Messrs. Chapman & Hall. He added subsequently a like volume of Young Couples, also without his name.
[15] There’s an earlier reference I’d like to share from a letter written in January, mentioning a small piece he wrote at that time, which wasn’t included in his published works: "I’m just as stuck as you are. I haven’t finished the Young Gentlemen, nor written the preface to Grimaldi, nor even thought about Oliver Twist, or come up with a topic for the plate." The Young Gentlemen was a small collection of sketches he wrote anonymously as a companion to a similar half-crown volume called Young Ladies (which he didn’t write), published by Messrs. Chapman & Hall. He later added a similar volume titled Young Couples, also without his name.
[17] Here is another of the same month: "All day I have been at work on Oliver, and hope to finish the chapter by bedtime. I wish you'd let me know what Sir Francis Burdett has been saying about him at some Birmingham meeting. B. has just sent me the Courier containing some reference to his speech; but the speech I haven't seen."
[17] Here’s another note from that month: "I’ve been working on Oliver all day and hope to finish the chapter by bedtime. I’d love to hear what Sir Francis Burdett has said about him at some meeting in Birmingham. B. just sent me the Courier with a mention of his speech, but I haven’t seen the actual speech."
[18] Reproduced as below, in large type, and without a word of contradiction or even doubt, in a biography of Mr. Dickens put forth by Mr. Hotten: "Dr. Shelton McKenzie, in the American Round Table, relates this anecdote of Oliver Twist: In London I was intimate with the brothers Cruikshank, Robert and George, but more particularly with the latter. Having called upon him one day at his house (it was then in Myddelton Terrace, Pentonville), I had to wait while he was finishing an etching, for which a printer's boy was waiting. To while away the time, I gladly complied with his suggestion that I should look over a portfolio crowded with etchings, proofs, and drawings, which lay upon the sofa. Among these, carelessly tied together in a wrap of brown paper, was a series of some twenty-five or thirty drawings, very carefully finished, through most of which were carried the well-known portraits of Fagin, Bill Sikes and his dog, Nancy, the Artful Dodger, and Master Charles Bates—all well known to the readers of Oliver Twist. There was no mistake about it; and when Cruikshank turned round, his work finished, I said as much. He told me that it had long been in his mind to show the life of a London thief by a series of drawings engraved by himself, in which, without a single line of letter-press, the story would be strikingly and clearly told. 'Dickens,' he continued, 'dropped in here one day, just as you have done, and, while waiting until I could speak with him, took up that identical portfolio, and ferreted out that bundle of drawings. When he came to that one which represents Fagin in the condemned cell, he studied it for half an hour, and told me that he was tempted to change the whole plot of his story; not to carry Oliver Twist through adventures in the country, but to take him up into the thieves' den in London, show what their life was, and bring Oliver through it without sin or shame. I consented to let him write up to as many of the designs as he thought would suit his purpose; and that was the way in which Fagin, Sikes, and Nancy were created. My drawings suggested them, rather than his strong individuality suggested my drawings.'"
[18] Reproduced as below, in large type, and without a word of contradiction or even doubt, in a biography of Mr. Dickens published by Mr. Hotten: "Dr. Shelton McKenzie, in the American Round Table, shares this anecdote about Oliver Twist: In London, I was close with the Cruikshank brothers, Robert and George, but especially with the latter. One day, I visited him at his house (which was then on Myddelton Terrace, Pentonville) and had to wait while he finished an etching that a printer's boy was waiting for. To pass the time, I happily agreed to his suggestion to look through a portfolio filled with etchings, proofs, and drawings that were on the sofa. Among them, loosely tied in a wrap of brown paper, was a collection of about twenty-five or thirty carefully finished drawings, most showcasing the well-known portraits of Fagin, Bill Sikes and his dog, Nancy, the Artful Dodger, and Master Charles Bates—all familiar to readers of Oliver Twist. There was no doubt about it; and when Cruikshank finished his work and turned around, I mentioned this. He told me that he'd been wanting to illustrate the life of a London thief through a series of drawings he would engrave, in which, without any text, the story would be told vividly and clearly. 'Dickens,' he continued, 'came by here one day, just like you have, and while he was waiting for me to be free, he picked up that exact portfolio and went through those drawings. When he got to the one showing Fagin in the condemned cell, he studied it for half an hour and said he was considering changing the entire plot of his story; instead of leading Oliver Twist through adventures in the countryside, he wanted to take him into the thieves' den in London, show their life, and lead Oliver through it without sin or shame. I agreed to let him write to as many of the designs as he thought would work for his story; and that's how Fagin, Sikes, and Nancy came to be. My drawings inspired them, rather than his strong individuality inspiring my drawings.'"
[19] This question has been partly solved, since my last edition, by Mr. Cruikshank's announcement in the Times, that, though Dr. Mackenzie had "confused some circumstances with respect to Mr. Dickens looking over some drawings and sketches," the substance of his information as to who it was that originated Oliver Twist, and all its characters, had been derived from Mr. Cruikshank himself. The worst part of the foregoing fable, therefore, has not Dr. Mackenzie for its author; and Mr. Cruikshank is to be congratulated on the prudence of his rigid silence respecting it as long as Mr. Dickens lived.
[19] This question has been partly resolved since my last edition, thanks to Mr. Cruikshank's statement in the Times that, although Dr. Mackenzie had "mixed up some details regarding Mr. Dickens reviewing some drawings and sketches," the core of his information about who created Oliver Twist and all its characters came from Mr. Cruikshank himself. Therefore, the most problematic part of the previous story is not authored by Dr. Mackenzie, and Mr. Cruikshank deserves credit for wisely staying silent about it while Mr. Dickens was alive.
[20] Upon receiving this letter I gently reminded him that I had made objection at the time to the arrangement on the failure of which he empowered me to bring about the settlement it was now proposed to supersede. I cannot give his reply, as it would be unbecoming to repeat the warmth of its expression to myself, but I preserve its first few lines to guard against any possible future misstatement: "If you suppose that anything in my letter could by the utmost latitude of construction imply the smallest dissatisfaction on my part, for God's sake dismiss such a thought from your mind. I have never had a momentary approach to doubt or discontent where you have been mediating for me. . . . I could say more, but you would think me foolish and rhapsodical; and such feeling as I have for you is better kept within one's own breast than vented in imperfect and inexpressive words."
[20] After getting this letter, I gently reminded him that I had raised an objection at the time to the arrangement that he had authorized me to settle, which is now being proposed to replace it. I won't share his exact reply because it wouldn't be right to repeat how warmly he expressed it to me, but I’ll keep the first few lines to prevent any potential misunderstanding in the future: "If you think that anything in my letter could even slightly suggest dissatisfaction on my part, please, for God's sake, dismiss that thought. I've never had a moment of doubt or displeasure while you’ve been mediating for me. . . . I could say more, but you’d just think I'm being silly and overly sentimental; the feelings I have for you are better kept to myself than expressed in clumsy and inadequate words."
[21] "I cannot call to mind now how I came to hear about Yorkshire schools when I was a not very robust child, sitting in by-places near Rochester castle, with a head full of Partridge, Strap, Tom Pipes, and Sancho Panza; but I know that my first impressions of them were picked up at that time."
[21] "I can't remember how I first heard about schools in Yorkshire when I was a pretty weak kid, hanging out in side streets near Rochester castle, with my head filled with Partridge, Strap, Tom Pipes, and Sancho Panza; but I do know that my first impressions of them were formed back then."
[22] Moore, in his Diary (April, 1837), describes Sydney crying down Dickens at a dinner in the Row, "and evidently without having given him a fair trial."
[22] Moore, in his Diary (April, 1837), describes Sydney criticizing Dickens at a dinner in the Row, "and clearly without having given him a fair chance."
[23] This portrait was given to Dickens by his publishers, for whom it was painted with a view to an engraving for Nickleby, which, however, was poorly executed, and of a size too small to do the original any kind of justice. To the courtesy of its present possessor, the Rev. Sir Edward Repps Joddrell, and to the careful art of Mr. Robert Graves, A.R.A., I owe the illustration at the opening of this volume, in which the head is for the first time worthily expressed. In some sort to help also the reader's fancy to a complete impression, Maclise having caught as happily the figure as the face, a skillful outline of the painting has been executed for the present page by Mr. Jeens. "As a likeness," said Mr. Thackeray of the work, and no higher praise could be given to it, "it is perfectly amazing. A looking-glass could not render a better fac-simile. We have here the real identical man Dickens, the inward as well as the outward of him."
[23] This portrait was given to Dickens by his publishers, who commissioned it for an engraving for Nickleby. Unfortunately, the engraving turned out poorly and was too small to do justice to the original. Thanks to the kindness of its current owner, the Rev. Sir Edward Repps Joddrell, and the skilled work of Mr. Robert Graves, A.R.A., I have the illustration at the beginning of this volume, where the head is represented for the first time in a worthy manner. To help the reader build a complete image, Maclise successfully captured both the figure and the face, and Mr. Jeens created a precise outline of the painting for this page. "As a likeness," Mr. Thackeray remarked about this work, and it’s the highest compliment it could receive, "it is perfectly amazing. A looking-glass couldn't produce a better copy. Here we have the real, identical man Dickens, capturing both his inner and outer self."
[24] We had at Twickenham a balloon club for the children, of which I appear to have been elected the president on condition of supplying all the balloons, a condition which I seem so insufficiently to have complied with as to bring down upon myself the subjoined resolution. The Snodgering Blee and Popem Jee were the little brother and sister, for whom, as for their successors, he was always inventing these surprising descriptive epithets. "Gammon Lodge, Saturday evening, June 23d, 1838. Sir, I am requested to inform you that at a numerous meeting of the Gammon Aeronautical Association for the Encouragement of Science and the Consumption of Spirits (of Wine)—Thomas Beard Esquire, Mrs. Charles Dickens, Charles Dickens, Esquire, the Snodgering Blee, Popem Jee, and other distinguished characters being present and assenting, the vote of censure of which I inclose a copy was unanimously passed upon you for gross negligence in the discharge of your duty, and most unjustifiable disregard of the best interests of the Society. I am, Sir, your most obedient servant, Charles Dickens, Honorary Secretary. To John Forster, Esquire."
[24] We had a balloon club for the kids at Twickenham, where I seem to have been elected president on the condition that I supply all the balloons—a condition I clearly didn’t meet well enough, resulting in the following resolution. The Snodgering Blee and Popem Jee were the little brother and sister for whom, as for their successors, he was always coming up with these surprising nicknames. "Gammon Lodge, Saturday evening, June 23rd, 1838. Sir, I am asked to inform you that at a large meeting of the Gammon Aeronautical Association for the Promotion of Science and the Enjoyment of Spirits (of Wine)—Thomas Beard Esquire, Mrs. Charles Dickens, Charles Dickens, Esquire, the Snodgering Blee, Popem Jee, and other notable individuals being present and in agreement, the enclosed vote of censure was unanimously passed against you for gross negligence in performing your duties and a most unjustifiable disregard for the best interests of the Society. I am, Sir, your most obedient servant, Charles Dickens, Honorary Secretary. To John Forster, Esquire."
[25] Not Mr. Procter, as, by an oversight of his own, Dickens caused to be said in an interesting paper on Wainewright which appeared in his weekly periodical.
[25] Not Mr. Procter, as, due to his own mistake, Dickens made it seem in an engaging article about Wainewright published in his weekly magazine.
[26] I quote from a letter dated Llangollen, Friday morning, 3d Nov. 1838: "I wrote to you last night, but by mistake the letter has gone on Heaven knows where in my portmanteau. I have only time to say, go straight to Liverpool by the first Birmingham train on Monday morning, and at the Adelphi Hotel in that town you will find me. I trust to you to see my dear Kate and bring the latest intelligence of her and the darlings. My best love to them."
[26] I'm quoting from a letter dated Llangollen, Friday morning, November 3rd, 1838: "I wrote to you last night, but by mistake, the letter has ended up who knows where in my suitcase. I only have time to say, go straight to Liverpool on the first Birmingham train on Monday morning, and you will find me at the Adelphi Hotel in that city. I trust you to see my dear Kate and bring me the latest updates about her and the kids. Send them my love."
[27] One of these disputes is referred to by Charles Knight in his Autobiography; and I see in Dickens's letters the mention of another in which I seem to have been turned by his kindly counsel from some folly I was going to commit: "I need not, I am sure, impress upon you the sincerity with which I make this representation. Our close and hearty friendship happily spares me the necessity. But I will add this—that feeling for you an attachment which no ties of blood or other relationship could ever awaken, and hoping to be to the end of my life your affectionate and chosen friend, I am convinced that I counsel you now as you would counsel me if I were in the like case; and I hope and trust that you will be led by an opinion which I am sure cannot be wrong when it is influenced by such feelings as I bear towards you, and so many warm and grateful considerations."
[27] One of these disputes is mentioned by Charles Knight in his Autobiography, and I notice in Dickens's letters that he refers to another situation where his kind advice prevented me from making a mistake: "I don't need to stress how sincere I am in bringing this up. Our strong and sincere friendship makes that unnecessary. But I will add that I have a bond with you that no blood relation or other obligation could ever create, and I hope to remain your loving and chosen friend for life. I truly believe I’m advising you as you would advise me if our roles were reversed, and I trust that you’ll consider an opinion which I know is correct, influenced as it is by the strong feelings and gratitude I have for you."
[28] This was the butler of Mr. Gilbert Winter, one of the kind Manchester friends whose hospitality we had enjoyed with Mr. Ainsworth, and whose shrewd, quaint, old-world ways come delightfully back to me as I write his once well-known and widely-honored name.
[28] This was the butler of Mr. Gilbert Winter, one of those generous friends from Manchester whose hospitality we enjoyed with Mr. Ainsworth, and whose clever, charming, old-fashioned ways come pleasantly back to me as I write his once well-known and widely-respected name.
[29] I have mentioned the fact in my Life of Landor; and to the passage I here add the comment made by Dickens when he read it: "It was at a celebration of his birthday in the first of his Bath lodgings, 35, St. James's Square, that the fancy which took the form of Little Nell in the Curiosity Shop first dawned on the genius of its creator. No character in prose fiction was a greater favorite with Landor. He thought that, upon her, Juliet might for a moment have turned her eyes from Romeo, and that Desdemona might have taken her hair-breadth escapes to heart, so interesting and pathetic did she seem to him; and when, some years later, the circumstance I have named was recalled to him, he broke into one of those whimsical bursts of comical extravagance out of which arose the fancy of Boythorn. With tremendous emphasis he confirmed the fact, and added that he had never in his life regretted anything so much as his having failed to carry out an intention he had formed respecting it; for he meant to have purchased that house, 35, St. James's Square, and then and there to have burnt it to the ground, to the end that no meaner association should ever desecrate the birthplace of Nell. Then he would pause a little, become conscious of our sense of his absurdity, and break into a thundering peal of laughter." Dickens had himself proposed to tell this story as a contribution to my biography of our common friend, but his departure for America prevented him. "I see," he wrote to me, as soon as the published book reached him, "you have told, with what our friend would have called won-derful accuracy, the little St. James's Square story, which a certain faithless wretch was to have related."
[29] I've mentioned this in my Life of Landor; and to the passage, I’ll add the comment Dickens made when he read it: "It was during a celebration of his birthday at his first lodgings in Bath, 35 St. James's Square, that the idea for Little Nell in the Curiosity Shop first blossomed in the mind of its creator. No character in prose fiction was adored more by Landor. He believed that Juliet might have, for a moment, looked away from Romeo, and that Desdemona could have felt personally impacted by her narrow escapes; she seemed so captivating and tragic to him. When, years later, he remembered this moment, he burst into one of those quirky fits of comical exaggeration that inspired the character of Boythorn. With great emphasis, he confirmed it and added that he had never regretted anything so much as his failure to follow through on a plan he had regarding it; he intended to buy that house at 35 St. James's Square and then burn it to the ground so that no lesser association would ever tarnish the birthplace of Nell. Then he would pause for a moment, become aware of how absurd he sounded, and erupt into a roaring fit of laughter." Dickens himself had planned to share this story as part of my biography of our mutual friend, but his trip to America got in the way. "I see," he wrote to me as soon as the published book reached him, "you have told, with what our friend would have called won-derful accuracy, the little St. James's Square story that a certain faithless wretch was supposed to tell."
[32] By way of a novelty to help off the stock, he had suggested (17th June), "Would it not be best to print new title-pages to the copies sheets and publish them as a new edition, with an interesting Preface? I am talking about all this as though the treaty were concluded, but I hope and trust that in effect it is, for negotiation and delay are worse to me than drawn daggers." See my remark ante, p. 123.
[32] To help clear out the stock, he suggested on June 17, "Wouldn't it be a good idea to print new title pages for the copies and release them as a new edition with a captivating Preface? I’m discussing all this as if the treaty is finalized, but I hope and believe that it effectively is, because negotiations and delays are more frustrating to me than drawn daggers." See my comment ante, p. 123.
[33] "Accept from me" (July 8, 1840), "as a slight memorial of your attached companion, the poor keepsake which accompanies this. My heart is not an eloquent one on matters which touch it most, but suppose this claret-jug the urn in which it lies, and believe that its warmest and truest blood is yours. This was the object of my fruitless search, and your curiosity, on Friday. At first I scarcely knew what trifle (you will deem it valuable, I know, for the giver's sake) to send you; but I thought it would be pleasant to connect it with our jovial moments, and to let it add, to the wine we shall drink from it together, a flavor which the choicest vintage could never impart. Take it from my hand,—filled to the brim and running over with truth and earnestness. I have just taken one parting look at it, and it seems the most elegant thing in the world to me, for I lose sight of the vase in the crowd of welcome associations that are clustering and wreathing themselves about it."
[33] "Accept this from me" (July 8, 1840), "as a small memento from your devoted companion, the little keepsake that comes with this message. I may not be very articulate about things that matter most to me, but think of this claret jug as the urn holding my feelings, and know that its warmest and truest essence belongs to you. This was what I was searching for in vain when you were curious on Friday. At first, I struggled to decide what small token (I know you’ll cherish it because it’s from me) to send you; but I thought it would be nice to link it to our joyful times and to let it add a flavor to the wine we will share that the finest vintage could never match. Take it from my hands—filled to the brim and overflowing with sincerity and warmth. I just took a last look at it, and it seems to me the most beautiful thing in the world, as I lose sight of the jug amid the welcoming memories that are surrounding and intertwining with it."
[34] Already he had been the subject of similar reports on the occasion of the family sorrow which compelled him to suspend the publication of Pickwick for two months (ante, p. 120), when, upon issuing a brief address in resuming his work (30th June, 1837), he said, "By one set of intimate acquaintances, especially well informed, he has been killed outright; by another, driven mad; by a third, imprisoned for debt; by a fourth, sent per steamer to the United States; by a fifth, rendered incapable of mental exertion for evermore; by all, in short, represented as doing anything but seeking in a few weeks' retirement the restoration of that cheerfulness and peace of which a sad bereavement had temporarily deprived him."
[34] He had already been the subject of similar rumors during the family's time of grief that forced him to pause the publication of Pickwick for two months (ante, p. 120). When he gave a brief speech to announce his return to work on June 30, 1837, he mentioned, "According to one group of close friends, who are particularly well-informed, I’ve been killed outright; another says I’ve gone mad; a third claims I’ve been imprisoned for debt; a fourth states I’ve been sent by steamer to the United States; and a fifth reports that I’ll never be capable of mental effort again. In short, everyone believes I’m doing anything but trying to restore the cheerfulness and peace that a recent loss has temporarily taken from me."
[37] Dickens refused to believe it at first. "My heart assures me Wilkie liveth," he wrote. "He is the sort of man who will be very old when he dies"—and certainly one would have said so.
[37] Dickens couldn't accept it at first. "My heart tells me Wilkie is alive," he wrote. "He's the kind of guy who will live to a really old age"—and most people would have agreed.
[38] The speeches generally were good, but the descriptions in the text by himself will here be thought sufficient. One or two sentences ought, however, to be given to show the tone of Wilson's praise, and I will only preface them by the remark that Dickens's acknowledgments, as well as his tribute to Wilkie, were expressed with great felicity, and that Peter Robertson seems to have thrown the company into convulsions of laughter by his imitation of Dominie Sampson's Pro-di-gi-ous, in a supposed interview between that worthy schoolmaster and Mr. Squeers of Dotheboys. I now quote from Professor Wilson's speech:
[38] The speeches were generally good, but the descriptions in the text by himself will be considered enough here. However, a sentence or two should be included to capture the tone of Wilson's praise, and I'll just say that Dickens's acknowledgments, as well as his tribute to Wilkie, were expressed very well, and that Peter Robertson seemed to have had the audience in stitches with his impersonation of Dominie Sampson's Prodigious, in a hypothetical conversation between that esteemed schoolmaster and Mr. Squeers of Dotheboys. I now quote from Professor Wilson's speech:
"Our friend has mingled in the common walks of life; he has made himself familiar with the lower orders of society. He has not been deterred by the aspect of vice and wickedness, and misery and guilt, from seeking a spirit of good in things evil, but has endeavored by the might of genius to transmute what was base into what is precious as the beaten gold. . . . But I shall be betrayed, if I go on much longer,—which it would be improper for me to do,—into something like a critical delineation of the genius of our illustrious guest. I shall not attempt that; but I cannot but express, in a few ineffectual words, the delight which every human bosom feels in the benign spirit which pervades all his creations. How kind and good a man he is, I need not say; nor what strength of genius he has acquired by that profound sympathy with his fellow-creatures, whether in prosperity and happiness, or overwhelmed with unfortunate circumstances, but who yet do not sink under their miseries, but trust to their own strength of endurance, to that principle of truth and honor and integrity which is no stranger to the uncultivated bosom, and which is found in the lowest abodes in as great strength as in the halls of nobles and the palaces of kings. Mr. Dickens is also a satirist. He satirizes human life, but he does not satirize it to degrade it. He does not wish to pull down what is high into the neighborhood of what is low. He does not seek to represent all virtue as a hollow thing, in which no confidence can be placed. He satirizes only the selfish, and the hard-hearted, and the cruel. Our distinguished guest may not have given us, as yet, a full and complete delineation of the female character. But this he has done: he has not endeavored to represent women as charming merely by the aid of accomplishments, however elegant and graceful. He has not depicted those accomplishments as their essentials, but has spoken of them rather as always inspired by a love of domesticity, by fidelity, by purity, by innocence, by charity, and by hope, which makes them discharge, under the most difficult circumstances, their duties, and which brings over their path in this world some glimpses of the light of heaven. Mr. Dickens may be assured that there is felt for him all over Scotland a sentiment of kindness, affection, admiration, and love; and I know for certain that the knowledge of these sentiments must make him happy."
"Our friend has mingled in everyday life; he has become familiar with the lower classes of society. He hasn’t been discouraged by the sight of vice and wickedness, misery and guilt, from searching for good in bad things, but has tried through his genius to transform what is base into something precious, like fine gold. But I should be misleading if I go on too long—which I shouldn’t do—into anything resembling a critical analysis of the talent of our esteemed guest. I won’t attempt that; however, I can’t help but express, in a few inadequate words, the joy that everyone feels in the kind spirit that flows through all his work. How kind and good he is, I don’t need to say; nor the strength of genius he has gained through a deep empathy with his fellow human beings, whether they are thriving and happy, or overwhelmed by unfortunate circumstances, yet do not succumb to their troubles, but rely on their own resilience, on that principle of truth, honor, and integrity that is found even in those who are less refined, and which exists in the humblest homes as robustly as in the halls of nobility and royal palaces. Mr. Dickens is also a satirist. He critiques human life, but not to belittle it. He doesn't want to drag down what is high to the level of what is low. He doesn’t seek to show all virtue as a empty facade, unworthy of trust. He satirizes only the selfish, the cold-hearted, and the cruel. Our distinguished guest may not have yet provided us with a full and complete portrayal of female character. But this he has accomplished: he has not tried to portray women as charming only through their accomplishments, no matter how elegant and graceful. He hasn’t portrayed these accomplishments as essential, but rather as inspired by a love of family, fidelity, purity, innocence, charity, and hope, which enables them to fulfill their duties even in the toughest circumstances and brings some glimpses of heavenly light into their lives. Mr. Dickens can be assured that all over Scotland, people feel a sentiment of kindness, affection, admiration, and love for him; and I know for sure that awareness of these feelings must bring him happiness."
[39] On this occasion, as he told me afterwards, the orchestra did a double stroke of business, much to the amazement of himself and his friends, by improvising at his entrance Charley is my Darling, amid tumultuous shouts of delight.
[39] On this occasion, as he told me later, the orchestra pulled off a double act, much to the surprise of himself and his friends, by playing Charley is my Darling as he walked in, amidst roaring cheers of joy.
[40] Poor good Mr. Fletcher had, among his other peculiarities, a habit of venting any particular emotion in a wildness of cry that went beyond even the descriptive power of his friend, who referred to it frequently in his Broadstairs letters. Here is an instance (20th Sept, 1840): "Mrs. M. being in the next machine the other day heard him howl like a wolf (as he does) when he first touched the cold water. I am glad to have my former story in that respect confirmed. There is no sound on earth like it. In the infernal regions there may be, but elsewhere there is no compound addition of wild beasts that could produce its like for their total. The description of the wolves in Robinson Crusoe is the nearest thing; but it's feeble—very feeble—in comparison." Of the generally amiable side to all his eccentricities I am tempted to give an illustration from the same letter: "An alarming report being brought to me the other day that he was preaching, I betook myself to the spot, and found he was reading Wordsworth to a family on the terrace, outside the house, in the open air and public way. The whole town were out. When he had given them a taste of Wordsworth, he sent home for Mrs. Norton's book, and entertained them with selections from that. He concluded with an imitation of Mrs. Hemans reading her own poetry, which he performed with a pocket-handkerchief over his head to imitate her veil—all this in public, before everybody."
[40] Poor Mr. Fletcher had, among his other quirks, a tendency to express any emotion in a way that was even more intense than what his friend described in his Broadstairs letters. Here’s an example (20th Sept, 1840): "Mrs. M. was in the next carriage the other day and heard him howl like a wolf (which he does) the moment he touched the cold water. I’m glad to have my previous story confirmed in that regard. There’s no sound on earth quite like it. Maybe there is something like it in the infernal regions, but nowhere else can a mix of wild animals create anything similar in total. The description of the wolves in Robinson Crusoe comes the closest; but it's weak—very weak—by comparison." To illustrate the generally friendly aspect of his eccentricities, I’m tempted to share an example from the same letter: "An alarming report came to me the other day that he was preaching, so I went to check it out, and found he was reading Wordsworth to a family on the terrace, outside the house, in the open air and along the public path. The whole town had turned out. After giving them a taste of Wordsworth, he sent someone to get Mrs. Norton’s book and entertained them with selections from that. He ended with an impersonation of Mrs. Hemans reading her own poetry, which he performed with a handkerchief over his head to mimic her veil—all this in public, in front of everyone."
[44] The initials used here are in no case those of the real names, being employed in every case for the express purpose of disguising the names. Generally the remark is applicable to all initials used in the letters printed in the course of this work.
[44] The initials used here do not correspond to real names and are specifically chosen to conceal identities. This statement generally applies to all initials featured in the letters included throughout this work.
[47] On the 22d of May, 1842.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ On May 22, 1842.
[48] The dinner was on the 10th of May, and early the following morning I had a letter about it from Mr. Blanchard, containing these words: "Washington Irving couldn't utter a word for trembling, and Moore was as little as usual. But, poor Tom Campbell—great Heavens! what a spectacle! Amid roars of laughter he began a sentence three times about something that Dugald Stewart or Lord Bacon had said, and never could get beyond those words. The Prince was capital, though deucedly frightened. He seems unaffected and amiable, as well as very clever."
[48] The dinner was on May 10th, and early the next morning I received a letter about it from Mr. Blanchard, which included these words: "Washington Irving could hardly speak because he was shaking, and Moore was just as quiet as always. But, poor Tom Campbell—good grief! What a sight! In the midst of roaring laughter, he attempted to start a sentence three times about something Dugald Stewart or Lord Bacon had said, but he couldn’t get past those words. The Prince was great, though seriously scared. He seems genuine and friendly, as well as very smart."
[49] At the top of the sheet, above the address and date, are the words "Read on. We have your precious letters, but you'll think at first we have not. C. D."
[49] At the top of the page, above the address and date, are the words "Read on. We have your precious letters, but you'll think at first we haven't. C. D."
[52] Notes, p. 49.
__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Notes, p. 49.
[55] At his second visit to America, when in Washington in February, 1868, Dickens, replying to a letter in which Irving was named, thus describes the last meeting and leave-taking to which he alludes above: "Your reference to my dear friend Washington Irving renews the vivid impressions reawakened in my mind at Baltimore but the other day. I saw his fine face for the last time in that city. He came there from New York to pass a day or two with me before I went westward; and they were made among the most memorable of my life by his delightful fancy and genial humor. Some unknown admirer of his books and mine sent to the hotel a most enormous mint-julep, wreathed with flowers. We sat, one on either side of it, with great solemnity (it filled a respectably-sized round table), but the solemnity was of very short duration. It was quite an enchanted julep, and carried us among innumerable people and places that we both knew. The julep held out far into the night, and my memory never saw him afterwards otherwise than as bending over it, with his straw, with an attempted air of gravity (after some anecdote involving some wonderfully droll and delicate observation of character), and then, as his eye caught mine, melting into that captivating laugh of his, which was the brightest and best I have ever heard."
[55] During his second visit to America, while in Washington in February 1868, Dickens, in response to a letter mentioning Irving, describes their last meeting and farewell as follows: "Your mention of my dear friend Washington Irving brings back the vivid memories recently stirred in my mind in Baltimore. I last saw his wonderful face in that city. He came from New York to spend a day or two with me before I headed west, and those moments became some of the most memorable of my life, filled with his delightful imagination and warm humor. Some unknown fan of his books and mine sent a massive mint julep to the hotel, adorned with flowers. We sat, one on each side of it, with serious expressions (it took up a good-sized round table), but our seriousness didn’t last long. It was quite the magical julep, and it transported us through countless people and places we both knew. The julep lasted deep into the night, and my memory holds him only as he leaned over it, sipping through his straw, trying to maintain a serious demeanor (after sharing some story that showcased his wonderfully funny and insightful take on character), and then, as our eyes met, he would break into that charming laugh of his, which was the brightest and best I’ve ever heard."
[58] Sixteen inches exactly.
16 inches exactly.
[59] A young lady's account of this party, written next morning, and quoted in one of the American memoirs of Dickens, enables us to contemplate his suffering from the point of view of those who inflicted it: "I went last evening to a party at Judge Walker's, given to the hero of the day. . . . When we reached the house, Mr. Dickens had left the crowded rooms, and was in the hall with his wife, about taking his departure when we entered the door. We were introduced to him in our wrapping; and in the flurry and embarrassment of the meeting, one of the party dropped a parcel, containing shoes, gloves, etc. Mr. Dickens, stooping, gathered them up and restored them with a laughing remark, and we bounded up-stairs to get our things off. Hastening down again, we found him with Mrs. Dickens seated upon a sofa, surrounded by a group of ladies; Judge Walker having requested him to delay his departure for a few moments, for the gratification of some tardy friends who had just arrived, ourselves among the number. Declining to re-enter the rooms where he had already taken leave of the guests, he had seated himself in the hall. He is young and handsome, has a mellow, beautiful eye, fine brow, and abundant hair. His mouth is large, and his smile so bright it seemed to shed light and happiness all about him. His manner is easy, negligent, but not elegant. His dress was foppish; in fact, he was overdressed, yet his garments were worn so easily they appeared to be a necessary part of him. (!) He had a dark coat, with lighter pantaloons; a black waistcoat, embroidered with colored flowers; and about his neck, covering his white shirt-front, was a black neckcloth, also embroidered in colors, in which were placed two large diamond pins connected by a chain. A gold watch-chain, and a large red rose in his button-hole, completed his toilet. He appeared a little weary, but answered the remarks made to him—for he originated none—in an agreeable manner. Mr. Beard's portrait of Fagin was so placed in the room that we could see it from where we stood surrounding him. One of the ladies asked him if it was his idea of the Jew. He replied, 'Very nearly.' Another, laughingly, requested that he would give her the rose he wore, as a memento. He shook his head and said, 'That will not do; he could not give it to one; the others would be jealous.' A half-dozen then insisted on having it, whereupon he proposed to divide the leaves among them. In taking the rose from his coat, either by design or accident, the leaves loosened and fell upon the floor, and amid considerable laughter the ladies stooped and gathered them. He remained some twenty minutes, perhaps, in the hall, and then took his leave. I must confess to considerable disappointment in the personal of my idol. I felt that his throne was shaken, although it never could be destroyed." This appalling picture supplements and very sufficiently explains the mournful passage in the text.
[59] A young woman's account of this party, written the next morning and quoted in one of the American memoirs of Dickens, allows us to view his suffering from the perspective of those who caused it: "I went to a party at Judge Walker's last night, held for the guest of honor. . . . When we arrived, Mr. Dickens had already left the crowded rooms and was in the hall with his wife, about to leave when we walked in. We were introduced to him still in our coats, and in the chaos and embarrassment of the moment, one of the guests dropped a parcel containing shoes, gloves, and more. Mr. Dickens bent down, picked them up, and handed them back with a humorous comment, and we rushed upstairs to take off our outerwear. When we came back down, we found him with Mrs. Dickens on a sofa, surrounded by a group of ladies; Judge Walker had asked him to wait a moment for some latecomers who had just arrived, us being among them. He declined to go back into the rooms where he had already said goodbye to the guests, so he sat in the hall. He is young and good-looking, with a warm, beautiful eye, a nice brow, and plenty of hair. His mouth is large, and his smile is so bright it seems to radiate light and joy all around him. His demeanor is relaxed and casual, but not elegant. His outfit was stylish; in fact, he was dressed up a bit too much, yet the way he wore them made it seem like they were a natural part of him. He had a dark coat with lighter pants, a black waistcoat adorned with colorful flowers, and around his neck, covering his white shirt front, was a black necktie, also embroidered with colors, featuring two large diamond pins connected by a chain. A gold watch chain and a big red rose in his buttonhole completed his look. He seemed a little tired but responded agreeably to the comments made to him—he didn't initiate any conversation himself. Mr. Beard's portrait of Fagin was positioned in the room so we could see it from where we circled him. One of the ladies asked if it was his vision of the Jew. He replied, 'Very nearly.' Another, jokingly, asked if he would give her the rose he wore as a keepsake. He shook his head and said, 'That won't work; I can't give it to just one; the others would be jealous.' A half-dozen then insisted on having it, and he offered to split the petals among them. While he was taking the rose from his coat, whether by design or accident, the petals came loose and fell to the floor, prompting a good deal of laughter as the ladies bent down to collect them. He stayed in the hall for about twenty minutes, perhaps, before saying his goodbyes. I must admit I was somewhat disappointed in my idol's appearance. I felt that his pedestal was shaken, though it could never be toppled." This striking image adds to and clearly explains the sorrowful passage in the text.
[60] "Runaway Negro in Jail" was the heading of the advertisement inclosed, which had a woodcut of master and slave in its corner, and announced that Wilford Garner, sheriff and jailer of Chicot County, Arkansas, requested owner to come and prove property—or——
[60] "Escaped Slave in Jail" was the title of the advertisement included, which featured a woodcut of a master and a slave in the corner, and stated that Wilford Garner, sheriff and jailer of Chicot County, Arkansas, requested the owner to come and prove ownership—or——
[61] Ten dashes underneath the word.
Ten dashes under the word.
[63] "Cant as we may, and as we shall to the end of all things, it is very much harder for the poor to be virtuous than it is for the rich; and the good that is in them, shines the brighter for it. In many a noble mansion lives a man, the best of husbands and of fathers, whose private worth in both capacities is justly lauded to the skies. But bring him here, upon this crowded deck. Strip from his fair young wife her silken dress and jewels, unbind her braided hair, stamp early wrinkles on her brow, pinch her pale cheek with care and much privation, array her faded form in coarsely patched attire, let there be nothing but his love to set her forth or deck her out, and you shall put it to the proof indeed. So change his station in the world that he shall see, in those young things who climb about his knee, not records of his wealth and name, but little wrestlers with him for his daily bread; so many poachers on his scanty meal; so many units to divide his every sum of comfort, and farther to reduce its small amount. In lieu of the endearments of childhood in its sweetest aspect, heap upon him all its pains and wants, its sicknesses and ills, its fretfulness, caprice, and querulous endurance: let its prattle be, not of engaging infant fancies, but of cold, and thirst, and hunger: and if his fatherly affection outlive all this, and he be patient, watchful, tender; careful of his children's lives, and mindful always of their joys and sorrows; then send him back to parliament, and pulpit, and to quarter sessions, and when he hears fine talk of the depravity of those who live from hand to mouth, and labour hard to do it, let him speak up, as one who knows, and tell those holders-forth that they, by parallel with such a class, should be high angels in their daily lives, and lay but humble siege to heaven at last. . . . Which of us shall say what he would be, if such realities, with small relief or change all through his days, were his! Looking round upon these people: far from home, houseless, indigent, wandering, weary with travel and hard living: and seeing how patiently they nursed and tended their young children: how they consulted ever their wants first, then half supplied their own; what gentle ministers of hope and faith the women were; how the men profited by their example; and how very, very seldom even a moment's petulance or harsh complaint broke out among them: I felt a stronger love and honour of my kind come glowing on my heart, and wished to God there had been many atheists in the better part of human nature there, to read this simple lesson in the book of life."
[63] "No matter how we try to justify it, it's way harder for poor people to be virtuous than for those who are rich; and the goodness they possess shines even brighter for it. In many grand homes lives a man, the best husband and father, whose private character in these roles is rightfully praised. But bring him here, to this crowded deck. Take away his fair young wife’s silk dress and jewelry, loosen her braided hair, put early wrinkles on her forehead, pinch her pale cheek with worry and struggle, dress her in coarsely patched clothes, and let there be nothing but his love to highlight her beauty, and you'll truly test him. Change his position in life so that when he looks at the young ones climbing on his knee, he sees not symbols of his wealth and status, but little ones fighting alongside him for the daily bread; so many dependents on his meager meals; so many mouths to share what little comfort he has, further reducing the small amount. Instead of the sweet endearments of childhood, pile upon him all its pains and needs, its sickness and troubles, its fussiness, unpredictability, and complaints: let their chatter be not about charming childhood dreams, but about cold, thirst, and hunger: and if his fatherly love survives all this, and he remains patient, watchful, and caring; attending to his children's lives and constantly aware of their joys and sorrows; then send him back to parliament, and the pulpit, and to local courts, and when he hears eloquent discussions about the moral failings of those who live hand to mouth and work hard to do it, let him speak up as someone who understands, and tell those who preach that, compared to such a class, they should be shining examples in their daily lives and humbly seek heaven in the end. . . . Which of us could say what we would be if such harsh realities, without much relief or change throughout our lives, were ours! Looking around at these people: far from home, homeless, struggling, worn out from travel and tough living: and seeing how patiently they cared for their young children: how they always prioritized their needs first, then barely met their own; what gentle bearers of hope and faith the women were; how the men learned from their example; and how very rarely a moment of frustration or harsh complaint broke out among them: I felt a stronger love and respect for my fellow humans well up in my heart, and wished to God there had been more skeptics in the better side of human nature there, to learn this simple lesson from the book of life."
[64] Printed in the Atlantic Monthly shortly after his death, and since collected, by Mr. James T. Fields of Boston, with several of later date addressed to himself, and much correspondence having reference to other writers, into a pleasing volume entitled Yesterdays with Authors.
[64] Published in the Atlantic Monthly shortly after his death, and later compiled by Mr. James T. Fields of Boston, along with some newer pieces addressed to him and a lot of correspondence related to other writers, into an enjoyable volume called Yesterdays with Authors.
[66] In one of the letters to his American friend Mr. Felton there is a glimpse of Christmas sports which had escaped my memory, and for which a corner may be found here, inasmuch as these gambols were characteristic of him at the pleasant old season, and were frequently renewed in future years. "The best of it is" (31 Dec. 1842) "that Forster and I have purchased between us the entire stock-in-trade of a conjuror, the practice and display whereof is entrusted to me. . . . In those tricks which require a confederate I am assisted (by reason of his imperturbable good humour) by Stanfield, who always does his part exactly the wrong way, to the unspeakable delight of all beholders. We come out on a small scale to-night, at Forster's, where we see the old year out and the new one in." Atlantic Monthly, July 1871.
[66] In one of the letters to his American friend Mr. Felton, there's a glimpse of Christmas fun that I had forgotten, and I want to include it here since these antics were typical of him during that cheerful old time and were often repeated in later years. "The best part is" (31 Dec. 1842) "that Forster and I have bought the entire inventory of a magician, and I’m in charge of the performance. ... For those tricks that need a partner, I get help from Stanfield, who, thanks to his unshakeable good humor, always does his part in the completely wrong way, much to the joy of everyone watching. We're putting on a small show tonight at Forster's, where we'll see the old year out and welcome the new one in." Atlantic Monthly, July 1871.
[67] "I have heard, as you have, from Lady Blessington, for whose behoof I have this morning penned the lines I send you herewith. But I have only done so to excuse myself, for I have not the least idea of their suiting her; and I hope she will send them back to you for the Ex." C. D. to J. F. July 1843. The lines are quite worth preserving.
[67] "I’ve heard, just like you, from Lady Blessington, for whom I wrote these lines this morning. But I did this just to cover myself, as I really have no idea if they’ll be suitable for her; I hope she’ll return them to you for the Ex." C. D. to J. F. July 1843. The lines are definitely worth keeping.
That Allah, written on a piece of paper,
Is better unction than can come of priest,
Of burning incense and of a lit candle:
Holding, that any scrap which bears that name
On whatever characters it’s imprinted,
Shall help the finder thro' the purging flame,
And give his tired feet a place to rest.
Accordingly, they make a mighty fuss
With every miserable pamphlet and intense speech,
And hoard the leaves—for they are not, like us
A highly advanced and intellectual nation:
And, always stooping in the miry ways
To seek out issues of this earthly nature,
They seldom, in their dust-exploring days,
Have some free time to look up to Heaven.
So have I known a country on the earth
Where darkness rested on the living waters,
And brutal ignorance, and toil, and dearth
Were the tough part of its sons and daughters:
And yet, where they who should have oped the door
Of charity and light, for everyone to find
Squabbled for words upon the altar-floor,
And rent The Book, in the fight for the binding.
The gentlest man among those pious Turks
God's living image is brutally distorted;
Their best High-Churchman, with no faith in works,
Bowstrings the Virtues in the marketplaces.
The Christian Pariah, whom both sects curse
(They insult all other men and turn against one another),
Walks thro' the world, not very much the worse,
He does as much good as he can and loves his brother.
[69] "After a period of 27 years, from a single school of five small infants, the work has grown into a cluster of some 300 schools, an aggregate of nearly 30,000 children, and a body of 3000 voluntary teachers, most of them the sons and daughters of toil. . . . Of more than 300,000 children which, on the most moderate calculation, we have a right to conclude have passed through these schools since their commencement, I venture to affirm that more than 100,000 of both sexes have been placed out in various ways, in emigration, in the marine, in trades, and in domestic service. For many consecutive years I have contributed prizes to thousands of the scholars; and let no one omit to call to mind what these children were, whence they came, and whither they were going without this merciful intervention. They would have been added to the perilous swarm of the wild, the lawless, the wretched, and the ignorant, instead of being, as by God's blessing they are, decent and comfortable, earning an honest livelihood, and adorning the community to which they belong." Letter of Lord Shaftesbury in the Times of the 13th of November, 1871.
[69] "After 27 years, our work has grown from a single school for five small children to a network of about 300 schools, serving nearly 30,000 children and supported by 3,000 volunteer teachers, most of whom are the children of workers. . . . Out of more than 300,000 children who, by the most conservative estimates, have gone through these schools since we started, I confidently assert that over 100,000 of both genders have been placed in various roles, including emigration, the navy, trades, and domestic service. For many years, I've awarded prizes to thousands of these students; and let’s not forget who these children were, where they came from, and where they would have been headed without this kind support. They would have joined the troubling ranks of the wild, the lawless, the miserable, and the uneducated, rather than becoming, as by God's grace they are, decent and stable individuals, earning honest livelihoods and contributing positively to their communities." Letter of Lord Shaftesbury in the Times of the 13th of November, 1871.
[70] Chuffey. Sydney Smith had written to Dickens on the appearance of his fourth number (early in April): "Chuffey is admirable. . . . I never read a finer piece of writing: it is deeply pathetic and affecting."
[70] Chuffey. Sydney Smith had written to Dickens about the release of his fourth issue (early in April): "Chuffey is amazing. . . . I’ve never read a better piece of writing: it's truly touching and moving."
[71] It may interest the reader, and be something of a curiosity of literature, if I give the expenses of the first edition of 6000, and of the 7000 more which constituted the five following editions, with the profit of the remaining 2000 which completed the sale of fifteen thousand:
[71] The reader might find it interesting, and somewhat of a literary curiosity, to know the costs of the first edition of 6,000 copies, along with the 7,000 additional copies for the next five editions, as well as the profit from the remaining 2,000 that completed the sale of fifteen thousand:
CHRISTMAS CAROL. | ||||
1st Edition, 6000 No. | ||||
1843. | £ | s. | d. | |
Dec. | Printing | 74 | 2 | 9 |
Paper | 89 | 2 | 0 | |
Drawings and Engravings | 49 | 18 | 0 | |
Two Steel Plates | 1 | 4 | 0 | |
Printing Plates | 15 | 17 | 6 | |
Paper for do | 7 | 12 | 0 | |
Colouring Plates | 120 | 0 | 0 | |
Binding | 180 | 0 | 0 | |
Incidents and Advertising | 168 | 7 | 8 | |
Commission | 99 | 4 | 6 | |
——————— | ||||
£805 | 8 | 5 | ||
============== |
2nd to the 7th Edition, making 7000 Copies. | ||||
1844. | £ | s. | d. | |
Jan. | Printing | 58 | 18 | 0 |
Paper | 103 | 19 | 0 | |
Printing Plates | 17 | 10 | 0 | |
Paper | 8 | 17 | 4 | |
Colouring Plates | 140 | 0 | 0 | |
Binding | 199 | 18 | 2 | |
Incidents and Advertising | 83 | 5 | 8 | |
Commission | 107 | 18 | 10 | |
—————— | ||||
£720 | 7 | 0 | ||
============= |
1843. | £ | s. | d. | ||
Dec. | Balance of a/c to Mr. Dickens's credit | 186 | 16 | 7 | |
1844. | |||||
Jan. to April. | Do. | Do. | 349 | 12 | 0 |
May to Dec. | Do. | Do. | 189 | 11 | 5 |
—————— | |||||
Amount of Profit on the Work | £726 | 0 | 0 | ||
============= |
[72] In November 1865 he wrote to me that the sale of his Christmas fancy for that year (Dr. Marigold's Prescriptions) had gone up, in the first week, to 250,000.
[72] In November 1865, he wrote to me that the sales of his Christmas special for that year (Dr. Marigold's Prescriptions) had reached 250,000 in the first week.
[73] A characteristic letter of this date, which will explain itself, has been kindly sent to me by the gentleman it was written to, Mr. James Verry Staples, of Bristol:—"Third of April, 1844. I have been very much gratified by the receipt of your interesting letter, and I assure you that it would have given me heartfelt satisfaction to have been in your place when you read my little Carol to the Poor in your neighbourhood. I have great faith in the poor; to the best of my ability I always endeavour to present them in a favourable light to the rich; and I shall never cease, I hope, until I die, to advocate their being made as happy and as wise as the circumstances of their condition, in its utmost improvement, will admit of their becoming. I mention this to assure you of two things. Firstly, that I try to deserve their attention; and secondly, that any such marks of their approval and confidence as you relate to me are most acceptable to my feelings, and go at once to my heart."
[73] A typical letter from this time, which will speak for itself, was kindly sent to me by the recipient, Mr. James Verry Staples of Bristol:—"April 3, 1844. I was really pleased to receive your interesting letter, and I want you to know that it would have truly made me happy to be in your position when you read my little Carol to the poor in your area. I have a strong belief in the poor; I always strive to present them in a positive light to the wealthy, and I hope to never stop advocating for their happiness and wisdom, as much as their circumstances will allow. I mention this to assure you of two things. First, that I try to earn their attention; and second, that any signs of their approval and trust that you share with me are very meaningful to me and touch my heart deeply."
[74] In a letter on the subject of copyright published by Thomas Hood after Dickens's return from America, he described what had passed between himself and one of these pirates who had issued a Master Humphrey's Clock edited by Bos. "Sir," said the man to Hood, "if you had observed the name, it was Bos, not Boz; s, sir, not z; and, besides, it would have been no piracy, sir, even with the z, because Master Humphrey's Clock, you see, sir, was not published as by Boz, but by Charles Dickens!"
[74] In a letter about copyright published by Thomas Hood after Dickens returned from America, he recounted his conversation with one of the pirates who had released a version of Master Humphrey's Clock edited by Bos. "Sir," the man said to Hood, "if you had noticed the name, it was Bos, not Boz; s, sir, not z; and besides, it wouldn't have been piracy, sir, even with the z, because Master Humphrey's Clock, you see, sir, was not published as by Boz, but by Charles Dickens!"
[75] The reader may be amused if I add in a note what he said of the pirates in those earlier days when grave matters touched him less gravely. On the eve of the first number of Nickleby he had issued a proclamation. "Whereas we are the only true and lawful Boz. And whereas it hath been reported to us, who are commencing a new work, that some dishonest dullards resident in the by-streets and cellars of this town impose upon the unwary and credulous, by producing cheap and wretched imitations of our delectable works. And whereas we derive but small comfort under this injury from the knowledge that the dishonest dullards aforesaid cannot, by reason of their mental smallness, follow near our heels, but are constrained to creep along by dirty and little-frequented ways, at a most respectful and humble distance behind. And whereas, in like manner, as some other vermin are not worth the killing for the sake of their carcases, so these kennel pirates are not worth the powder and shot of the law, inasmuch as whatever damages they may commit they are in no condition to pay any. This is to give notice, that we have at length devised a mode of execution for them, so summary and terrible, that if any gang or gangs thereof presume to hoist but one shred of the colours of the good ship Nickleby, we will hang them on gibbets so lofty and enduring that their remains shall be a monument of our just vengeance to all succeeding ages; and it shall not lie in the power of any lord high admiral, on earth, to cause them to be taken down again." The last paragraph of the proclamation informed the potentates of Paternoster-row, that from the then ensuing day of the thirtieth of March, until farther notice, "we shall hold our Levees, as heretofore, on the last evening but one of every month, between the hours of seven and nine, at our Board of Trade, number one hundred and eighty-six in the Strand, London; where we again request the attendance (in vast crowds) of their accredited agents and ambassadors. Gentlemen to wear knots upon their shoulders; and patent cabs to draw up with their doors towards the grand entrance, for the convenience of loading."
[75] The reader might find it entertaining if I mention what he said about pirates in those earlier days when serious matters didn't bother him as much. On the eve of the first issue of Nickleby, he issued a proclamation. "Whereas we are the only true and lawful Boz. And whereas it has come to our attention, as we start a new work, that some dishonest fools living in the back streets and cellars of this town are tricking the unsuspecting and gullible by producing cheap and awful imitations of our delightful works. And whereas we find little comfort in knowing that these dishonest fools cannot, due to their mental shortcomings, come close to our level, but are forced to tread along filthy and rarely traveled paths, keeping a very respectful and humble distance behind. And whereas, just as some other pests aren’t worth the trouble of killing for their carcasses, so these gutter pirates aren’t worth the legal resources it would take to deal with them, since whatever harm they may cause, they are in no position to pay for it. This serves as notice that we have finally devised a punishment for them, so swift and awful, that if any gang dares to display even a scrap of the colors of the good ship Nickleby, we will hang them on gallows so high and lasting that their remains will stand as a monument of our rightful wrath for all future generations; and no lord high admiral, in this world, will have the power to take them down again." The last paragraph of the proclamation informed the powerful figures of Paternoster-row that starting from the upcoming thirtieth of March, until further notice, "we will hold our levees, as before, on the second to last evening of every month, between the hours of seven and nine, at our Board of Trade, number one hundred eighty-six in the Strand, London; where we again request the attendance (in large numbers) of their official representatives and diplomats. Gentlemen should wear knots on their shoulders; and taxis should pull up with their doors facing the grand entrance for easy loading."
[76] This might seem not very credible if I did not give the passage literally, and I therefore quote it from the careful translation of Taine's History of English Literature by Mr. Van Laun, one of the masters of the Edinburgh Academy, where I will venture to hope that other authorities on English Literature are at the same time admitted. "Jonas" (also in Chuzzlewit) "is on the verge of madness. There are other characters quite mad. Dickens has drawn three or four portraits of madmen, very agreeable at first sight, but so true that they are in reality horrible. It needed an imagination like his, irregular, excessive, capable of fixed ideas, to exhibit the derangements of reason. Two especially there are, which make us laugh, and which make us shudder. Augustus, the gloomy maniac, who is on the point of marrying Miss Pecksniff; and poor Mr. Dick, half an idiot, half a monomaniac, who lives with Miss Trotwood. . . . The play of these shattered reasons is like the creaking of a dislocated door; it makes one sick to hear it." (Vol. ii. p. 346.) The original was published before Dickens's death, but he certainly never saw it.
[76] This might seem unbelievable if I didn't quote the passage directly, so I'm providing it from Mr. Van Laun's careful translation of Taine's History of English Literature, who was one of the masters at the Edinburgh Academy, where I hope other authorities on English Literature are also considered. "Jonas" (also in Chuzzlewit) "is on the edge of madness. There are other characters who are completely insane. Dickens has created three or four portraits of madmen that seem pleasant at first glance, but are so accurate that they are truly terrifying. It took an imagination like his—irregular, excessive, and capable of fixed ideas—to depict the distortions of reason. Two characters in particular make us laugh, yet also make us shudder: Augustus, the dark maniac who is about to marry Miss Pecksniff; and poor Mr. Dick, half an idiot and half a monomaniac, who lives with Miss Trotwood. . . . The way these fractured minds operate is like the creaking of a dislocated door; it makes one feel ill to hear it." (Vol. ii. p. 346.) The original was published before Dickens's death, but he certainly never saw it.
[77] He wrote from Marseilles (17th Dec. 1844). "When poor Overs was dying he suddenly asked for a pen and ink and some paper, and made up a little parcel for me which it was his last conscious act to direct. She (his wife) told me this and gave it me. I opened it last night. It was a copy of his little book in which he had written my name, 'With his devotion.' I thought it simple and affecting of the poor fellow." From a later letter a few lines may be added. "Mrs. Overs tells me" (Monte Vacchi, 30th March, 1845) "that Miss Coutts has sent her, at different times, sixteen pounds, has sent a doctor to her children, and has got one of the girls into the Orphan School. When I wrote her a word in the poor woman's behalf, she wrote me back to the effect that it was a kindness to herself to have done so, 'for what is the use of my means but to try and do some good with them?'"
[77] He wrote from Marseilles (Dec. 17, 1844). "When poor Overs was dying, he suddenly asked for a pen, ink, and some paper, and put together a little package for me, which was his last conscious act to address. She (his wife) told me this and gave it to me. I opened it last night. It was a copy of his little book in which he had written my name, 'With his devotion.' I thought it was simple and touching of the poor guy." From a later letter, a few lines can be added. "Mrs. Overs tells me" (Monte Vacchi, March 30, 1845) "that Miss Coutts has sent her, at different times, sixteen pounds, has sent a doctor for her children, and has gotten one of the girls into the Orphan School. When I wrote her a note on behalf of the poor woman, she wrote back saying that it was a kindness to herself to have done so, 'for what good are my means if not to try and do some good with them?'"
[78] He regretted one chance missed by his eccentric friend, which he described to me just before he left Italy. "I saw last night an old palazzo of the Doria, six miles from here, upon the sea, which De la Rue urged Fletcher to take for us, when he was bent on that detestable villa Bagnerello; which villa the Genoese have hired, time out of mind, for one-fourth of what I paid, as they told him again and again before he made the agreement. This is one of the strangest old palaces in Italy, surrounded by beautiful woods of great trees (an immense rarity here) some miles in extent: and has upon the terrace a high tower, formerly a prison for offenders against the family, and a defence against the pirates. The present Doria lets it as it stands for £40 English—for the year. . . . And the grounds are no expense; being proudly maintained by the Doria, who spends this rent, when he gets it, in repairing the roof and windows. It is a wonderful house; full of the most unaccountable pictures and most incredible furniture: every room in it like the most quaint and fanciful of Cattermole's pictures; and how many rooms I am afraid to say." 2nd of June, 1845.
[78] He regretted a missed opportunity from his quirky friend, who shared this with me just before leaving Italy. "Last night, I saw an old Doria palace, six miles away by the sea, which De la Rue pushed Fletcher to buy for us while he was fixated on that awful villa Bagnerello; a villa that the Genoese have rented for ages, at a quarter of what I paid, as they told him repeatedly before he made the deal. This is one of the strangest old palaces in Italy, surrounded by beautiful woods of large trees (an enormous rarity here) stretching for miles: it has on the terrace a tall tower, which used to be a prison for those who wronged the family and a defense against pirates. The current Doria rents it out as is for £40 English a year... And the grounds cost nothing to maintain; they're proudly taken care of by the Doria, who spends that rent, when he receives it, on fixing the roof and windows. It’s an amazing house, filled with the most perplexing paintings and the most unbelievable furniture: every room looks like the most eccentric and imaginative of Cattermole's artworks; and I’m afraid to say how many rooms there are." 2nd of June, 1845.
[79] "We have had a London sky until to-day," he wrote on the 20th of July, "gray and cloudy as you please: but I am most disappointed, I think, in the evenings, which are as commonplace as need be; for there is no twilight, and as to the stars giving more light here than elsewhere, that is humbug." The summer of 1844 seems to have been, however, an unusually stormy and wet season. He wrote to me on the 21st of October that they had had, so far, only four really clear days since they came to Italy.
[79] "We've had a London sky until today," he wrote on July 20th, "gray and cloudy as ever: but I'm really let down, especially by the evenings, which are as boring as they can be; because there's no twilight, and the stars aren't any brighter here than anywhere else, that's nonsense." However, the summer of 1844 seems to have been an unusually stormy and wet season. He wrote to me on October 21st that they had, so far, only had four truly clear days since they arrived in Italy.
[80] "My faith on that-point is decidedly shaken, which reminds me to ask you whether you ever read Simond's Tour in Italy. It is a most charming book, and eminently remarkable for its excellent sense, and determination not to give in to conventional lies." In a later letter he says: "None of the books are unaffected and true but Simond's, which charms me more and more by its boldness, and its frank exhibition of that rare and admirable quality which enables a man to form opinions for himself without a miserable and slavish reference to the pretended opinions of other people. His notices of the leading pictures enchant me. They are so perfectly just and faithful, and so whimsically shrewd." Rome, 9th of March, 1845.
[80] "My faith on that point is definitely shaken, which makes me want to ask if you ever read Simond's Tour in Italy. It's a really charming book and stands out for its clear insights and its refusal to accept conventional lies." In a later letter, he writes: "None of the books are unaffected and truthful except Simond's, which continues to charm me more and more with its boldness and its honest display of that rare and admirable quality that allows a person to form their own opinions without a miserable and slavish dependence on the supposed opinions of others. His comments on the main paintings delight me. They are so perfectly accurate and genuine, and so whimsically sharp." Rome, 9th of March, 1845.
Here’s my singing!
For the stars help me, and the sea bears part;
The night is clinging
Closer to Venice' streets to leave one space
Above me, where your face
May light my joyous heart to thee its dwelling-place.
Written to express Maclise's subject in the Academy catalogue.
Written to convey Maclise's theme in the Academy catalogue.
[82] "Their house is next to ours on the right, with vineyard between; but the place is so oddly contrived that one has to go a full mile round to get to their door."
[82] "Their house is right next to ours on the right, with a vineyard in between; but the layout is so strange that you have to go a full mile around to reach their front door."
[83] Not however, happily for them, in another important particular, for on the eve of their return to England she declared her intention of staying behind and marrying an Italian. "She will have to go to Florence, I find" (12th of May 1845), "to be married in Lord Holland's house: and even then is only married according to the English law: having no legal rights from such a marriage, either in France or Italy. The man hasn't a penny. If there were an opening for a nice clean restaurant in Genoa—which I don't believe there is, for the Genoese have a natural enjoyment of dirt, garlic, and oil—it would still be a very hazardous venture; as the priests will certainly damage the man, if they can, for marrying a Protestant woman. However, the utmost I can do is to take care, if such a crisis should arrive, that she shall not want the means of getting home to England. As my father would observe, she has sown and must reap."
[83] Not, happily for them, in another important way, because on the eve of their return to England she announced her decision to stay behind and marry an Italian. "She will have to go to Florence, I find" (12th of May 1845), "to get married in Lord Holland's house: and even then, she's only married under English law, having no legal rights from that marriage, either in France or Italy. The guy doesn't have a penny. Even if there were a chance for a nice clean restaurant in Genoa—which I doubt, as the Genoese naturally enjoy dirt, garlic, and oil—it would still be a risky business; the priests will definitely harm the guy, if they can, for marrying a Protestant woman. However, the best I can do is ensure that if such a situation arises, she won't lack the means to get back home to England. As my father would say, she has sown and must reap."
[84] He had carried with him, I may here mention, letters of introduction to residents in all parts of Italy, of which I believe he delivered hardly one. Writing to me a couple of months before he left the country he congratulated himself on this fact. "We are living very quietly; and I am now more than ever glad that I have kept myself aloof from the 'receiving' natives always, and delivered scarcely any of my letters of introduction. If I had, I should have seen nothing and known less. I have observed that the English women who have married foreigners are invariably the most audacious in the license they assume. Think of one lady married to a royal chamberlain (not here) who said at dinner to the master of the house at a place where I was dining—that she had brought back his Satirist, but didn't think there was quite so much 'fun' in it as there used to be. I looked at the paper afterwards, and found it crammed with such vile obscenity as positively made one's hair stand on end."
[84] He took with him, I should mention, letters of introduction to people in different parts of Italy, but I believe he hardly delivered any. Writing to me a couple of months before he left the country, he was proud of this fact. "We're living very quietly, and I'm now more glad than ever that I’ve kept my distance from the 'receiving' locals and hardly delivered any of my letters of introduction. If I had, I wouldn’t have seen anything and would know even less. I've noticed that English women who marry foreigners are often the boldest in the behavior they take on. Imagine one woman married to a royal chamberlain (not here) who said at dinner to the host where I was dining—that she brought back his Satirist, but didn’t think it was quite as 'funny' as it used to be. I looked at the paper afterward and found it filled with such disgusting obscenity that it truly made my hair stand on end."
[85] What his poor little dog suffered should not be omitted from the troubles of the master who was so fond of him. "Timber has had every hair upon his body cut off because of the fleas, and he looks like the ghost of a drowned dog come out of a pond after a week or so. It is very awful to see him slide into a room. He knows the change upon him, and is always turning round and round to look for himself. I think he'll die of grief." Three weeks later: "Timber's hair is growing again, so that you can dimly perceive him to be a dog. The fleas only keep three of his legs off the ground now, and he sometimes moves of his own accord towards some place where they don't want to go." His improvement was slow, but after this continuous.
[85] What his poor little dog went through shouldn’t be left out from the troubles of the owner who loved him so much. "Timber has had every hair on his body shaved off because of the fleas, and he looks like the ghost of a drowned dog that’s just come out of a pond after about a week. It’s really awful to see him slide into a room. He knows something's changed about him and keeps turning around to look for himself. I think he’ll die of sadness." Three weeks later: "Timber's hair is growing back, so you can barely tell he’s a dog again. The fleas only keep three of his legs off the ground now, and he sometimes moves on his own toward places they don’t want to go." His recovery was slow, but it continued after this.
[86] A characteristic message for Jerrold came in a later letter (12th of May, 1845): "I wish you would suggest to Jerrold for me as a Caudle subject (if he pursue that idea). 'Mr. Caudle has incidentally remarked that the house-maid is good-looking.'"
[86] A typical message for Jerrold appeared in a later letter (May 12, 1845): "I’d like you to propose to Jerrold as a topic for Caudle (if he continues with that idea). 'Mr. Caudle has casually pointed out that the housemaid is attractive.'"
[87] Of the dangers of the bay he had before written to me (10th of August). "A monk was drowned here on Saturday evening. He was bathing with two other monks, who bolted when he cried out that he was sinking—in consequence, I suppose, of his certainty of going to Heaven."
[87] He had previously warned me about the dangers of the bay (August 10th). "A monk drowned here on Saturday evening. He was swimming with two other monks, who ran away when he shouted that he was sinking—probably because he was sure he was heading to Heaven."
[89] "Very vast you will say, and very dreary; but it is not so really. The paintings are so fresh, and the proportions so agreeable to the eye, that the effect is not only cheerful but snug. . . . We are a little incommoded by applications from strangers to go over the interior. The paintings were designed by Michael Angelo, and have a great reputation. . . . Certain of these frescoes were reported officially to the Fine Art Commissioners by Wilson as the best in Italy . . . I allowed a party of priests to be shown the great hall yesterday . . . It is in perfect repair, and the doors almost shut—which is quite a miraculous circumstance. I wish you could see it, my dear F. Gracious Heavens! if you could only come back with me, wouldn't I soon flash on your astonished sight." (6th of October.)
[89] "You might say it's very vast and gloomy, but that's not quite true. The paintings are so vibrant, and the proportions are so pleasing to the eye that the overall effect is not only cheerful but cozy. . . . We're a bit bothered by requests from strangers wanting to tour the inside. The paintings were created by Michelangelo and are very highly regarded. . . . Some of these frescoes were officially reported to the Fine Art Commissioners by Wilson as the best in Italy. . . . I let a group of priests see the great hall yesterday. . . . It's in perfect condition, and the doors almost close—which is quite miraculous. I wish you could see it, my dear F. Oh my goodness! If only you could come back with me, just imagine the surprise on your face." (6th of October.)
[90] "I began this letter, my dear friend" (he wrote it from Venice on Tuesday night the 12th of November), "with the intention of describing my travels as I went on. But I have seen so much, and travelled so hard (seldom dining, and being almost always up by candle light), that I must reserve my crayons for the greater leisure of the Peschiere after we have met, and I have again returned to it. As soon as I have fixed a place in my mind, I bolt—at such strange seasons and at such unexpected angles, that the brave C stares again. But in this way, and by insisting on having everything shewn to me whether or no, and against all precedents and orders of proceeding, I get on wonderfully." Two days before he had written to me from Ferrara, after the very pretty description of the vineyards between Piacenza and Parma which will be found in the Pictures from Italy (pp. 203-4): "If you want an antidote to this, I may observe that I got up, this moment, to fasten the window; and the street looked as like some byeway in Whitechapel—or—I look again—like Wych Street, down by the little barber's shop on the same side of the way as Holywell Street—or—I look again—as like Holywell Street itself—as ever street was like to street, or ever will be, in this world."
[90] "I started this letter, my dear friend" (he wrote it from Venice on Tuesday night, November 12th), "with the plan of describing my travels as I went. But I've seen so much and traveled so hard (often skipping dinner and getting up almost always by candlelight), that I have to save my sketches for a more leisurely time in Peschiere after we've met, and I've returned there. As soon as I have a place in mind, I take off—at such odd times and from such unexpected angles that the brave C is surprised once again. But this way, and by insisting on seeing everything whether it's normal or not, and against all expectations and procedures, I'm making great progress." Two days before, he had written to me from Ferrara, following the lovely description of the vineyards between Piacenza and Parma, which you can find in the Pictures from Italy (pp. 203-4): "If you need a contrast to this, I should mention that I just got up to close the window; and the street looked just like some back alley in Whitechapel—or—hold on, it looks like Wych Street, down by the little barber's shop on the same side as Holywell Street—or—looking again—it’s just like Holywell Street itself—like any street has ever looked like another, or ever will, in this world."
[91] Four months later, after he had seen the galleries at Rome and the other great cities, he sent me a remark which has since had eloquent reinforcement from critics of undeniable authority. "The most famous of the oil paintings in the Vatican you know through the medium of the finest line-engravings in the world; and as to some of them I much doubt, if you had seen them with me, whether you might not think you had lost little in having only known them hitherto in that translation. Where the drawing is poor and meagre, or alloyed by time,—it is so, and it must be, often; though no doubt it is a heresy to hint at such a thing—the engraving presents the forms and the idea to you, in a simple majesty which such defects impair. Where this is not the case, and all is stately and harmonious, still it is somehow in the very grain and nature of a delicate engraving to suggest to you (I think) the utmost delicacy, finish, and refinement, as belonging to the original. Therefore, though the Picture in this latter case will greatly charm and interest you, it does not take you by surprise. You are quite prepared beforehand for the fullest excellence of which it is capable." In the same letter he wrote of what remained always a delight in his memory, the charm of the more private collections. He found magnificent portraits and paintings in the private palaces, where he thought them seen to greater advantage than in galleries; because in numbers not so large as to distract attention or confuse the eye. "There are portraits innumerable by Titian, Rubens, Rembrandt and Vandyke; heads by Guido, and Domenichino, and Carlo Dolci; subjects by Raphael, and Correggio, and Murillo, and Paul Veronese, and Salvator; which it would be difficult indeed to praise too highly, or to praise enough. It is a happiness to me to think that they cannot be felt, as they should be felt, by the profound connoisseurs who fall into fits upon the longest notice and the most unreasonable terms. Such tenderness and grace, such noble elevation, purity, and beauty, so shine upon me from some well-remembered spots in the walls of these galleries, as to relieve my tortured memory from legions of whining friars and waxy holy families. I forgive, from the bottom of my soul, whole orchestras of earthy angels, and whole groves of St. Sebastians stuck as full of arrows according to pattern as a lying-in pincushion is stuck with pins. And I am in no humour to quarrel even with that priestly infatuation, or priestly doggedness of purpose, which persists in reducing every mystery of our religion to some literal development in paint and canvas, equally repugnant to the reason and the sentiment of any thinking man."
[91] Four months later, after he had visited the galleries in Rome and other major cities, he sent me a comment that has since been strongly echoed by well-respected critics. "The most famous oil paintings in the Vatican you know through some of the finest line engravings in the world; and regarding some of these, I seriously doubt that if you saw them with me, you would feel you missed much by only having known them in that form. Where the drawing is lacking or diluted by time—and it often is; although it might be sacrilegious to suggest this—the engraving presents the forms and concepts to you in a straightforward majesty that those flaws lessen. Where this isn’t true, and everything is grand and harmonious, it still seems to me that a delicate engraving naturally suggests the utmost delicacy, finish, and refinement as inherent to the original. Therefore, even though the painting in this latter case will deeply enchant and engage you, it won’t catch you off guard. You’re completely prepared in advance for the highest excellence it can achieve." In the same letter, he spoke about what remained a constant delight in his memory: the charm of the more private collections. He discovered magnificent portraits and paintings in private palaces, where he believed they could be appreciated better than in galleries, because the smaller number didn't distract attention or confuse the eye. "There are countless portraits by Titian, Rubens, Rembrandt, and Vandyke; heads by Guido, Domenichino, and Carlo Dolci; subjects by Raphael, Correggio, Murillo, Paul Veronese, and Salvator; which it would truly be hard to praise too highly or to praise enough. I take comfort in knowing that these can’t be experienced as they should be by the serious connoisseurs who become enraptured by the longest notices and the most unreasonable terms. Such tenderness and grace, such noble elevation, purity, and beauty emanate from some well-remembered spots on the walls of these galleries, alleviating my troubled memories of countless whining friars and waxy holy families. I completely forgive entire orchestras of earthly angels and groves of St. Sebastians filled with arrows just like a pincushion filled with pins. And I'm not in the mood to argue even with that priestly obsession or stubbornness of purpose that insists on reducing every mystery of our religion to some literal representation in paint and canvas, which is equally offensive to the reason and feelings of any thinking person."
[93] I find the evening mentioned in the diary which Mr. Barham's son quotes in his Memoir. "December 5, 1844. Dined at Forster's with Charles Dickens, Stanfield, Maclise, and Albany Fonblanque. Dickens read with remarkable effect his Christmas story, the Chimes, from the proofs. . . ." (ii. 191.)
[93] I find the evening mentioned in the diary that Mr. Barham's son quotes in his Memoir. "December 5, 1844. Had dinner at Forster's with Charles Dickens, Stanfield, Maclise, and Albany Fonblanque. Dickens read his Christmas story, the Chimes, from the proofs, and it had a remarkable impact. . . ." (ii. 191.)
[94] In a previous letter he had told me that history. "Apropos of servants, I must tell you of a child-bearing handmaiden of some friends of ours, a thorough out and outer, who, by way of expiating her sins, caused herself, the other day, to be received into the bosom of the infallible church. She had two marchionesses for her sponsors; and she is heralded in the Genoa newspapers as Miss B—, an English lady, who has repented of her errors and saved her soul alive."
[94] In a previous letter, he told me about history. "Speaking of servants, I have to tell you about a handmaiden who recently gave birth for some friends of ours, a real piece of work. To atone for her mistakes, she decided to be welcomed into the embrace of the infallible church the other day. She had two marchionesses as her sponsors; and the newspapers in Genoa are announcing her as Miss B—, an English woman who has repented of her wrongdoings and saved her soul."
[95] "I feel the distance between us now, indeed. I would to Heaven, my dearest friend, that I could remind you in a manner more lively and affectionate than this dull sheet of paper can put on, that you have a Brother left. One bound to you by ties as strong as ever Nature forged. By ties never to be broken, weakened, changed in any way—but to be knotted tighter up, if that be possible, until the same end comes to them as has come to these. That end but the bright beginning of a happier union, I believe; and have never more strongly and religiously believed (and oh! Forster, with what a sore heart I have thanked God for it) than when that shadow has fallen on my own hearth, and made it cold and dark as suddenly as in the home of that poor girl you tell me of. . . . When you write to me again, the pain of this will have passed. No consolation can be so certain and so lasting to you as that softened and manly sorrow which springs up from the memory of the Dead. I read your heart as easily as if I held it in my hand, this moment. And I know—I know, my dear friend—that before the ground is green above him, you will be content that what was capable of death in him, should lie there. . . . I am glad to think it was so easy, and full of peace. What can we hope for more, when our own time comes!—The day when he visited us in our old house is as fresh to me as if it had been yesterday. I remember him as well as I remember you. . . . I have many things to say, but cannot say them now. Your attached and loving friend for life, and far, I hope, beyond it. C. D." (8th of January, 1845.)
[95] "I really feel the distance between us now. I wish to Heaven, my dearest friend, that I could remind you in a more lively and affectionate way than this dull piece of paper can convey, that you still have a Brother. One who is connected to you by bonds as strong as Nature itself made. Bonds that will never be broken, weakened, or changed in any way—but will only tighten, if that’s even possible, until the same fate befalls them as has happened to these. That fate is just the bright beginning of a happier union, I believe; and I have never believed it more strongly and faithfully (and oh! Forster, with what a heavy heart I’ve thanked God for it) than when that shadow has fallen over my own home, making it as cold and dark as suddenly as in the house of that poor girl you mentioned. . . . When you write to me again, the pain of this will have faded. No consolation can be as certain and lasting for you as that gentle and genuine sorrow that arises from the memory of the Dead. I can read your heart just as easily as if I held it in my hands right now. And I know—I know, my dear friend—that before the ground turns green above him, you will be at peace with the fact that what was mortal in him should lie there. . . . I am glad to think it was so easy and peaceful. What more can we hope for when our own time comes!—The day he visited us in our old house is as clear in my memory as if it happened yesterday. I remember him just as well as I remember you. . . . I have many things to say, but I can’t express them now. Your devoted and loving friend for life, and hopefully far beyond it. C. D." (8th of January, 1845.)
[96] "A Yorkshireman, who talks Yorkshire Italian with the drollest and pleasantest effect; a jolly, hospitable excellent fellow; as odd yet kindly a mixture of shrewdness and simplicity as I have ever seen. He is the only Englishman in these parts who has been able to erect an English household out of Italian servants, but he has done it to admiration. It would be a capital country-house at home; and for staying in 'first-rate.' (I find myself inadvertently quoting Tom Thumb.) Mr. Walton is a man of an extraordinarily kind heart, and has a compassionate regard for Fletcher to whom his house is open as a home, which is half affecting and half ludicrous. He paid the other day a hundred pounds for him, which he knows he will never see a penny of again." C. D. to J. F. (25th of January, 1845.)
[96] "A Yorkshireman who speaks a funny, charming version of Italian; a cheerful, welcoming, and truly great guy; a peculiar yet warm blend of cleverness and naivety that I've ever seen. He’s the only Englishman around here who’s managed to create an English home with Italian servants, and he’s done it brilliantly. It could be a fantastic country house back home; and for visiting, it’s 'first-rate.' (I find myself accidentally quoting Tom Thumb.) Mr. Walton is an incredibly kind-hearted man and has a compassionate attitude toward Fletcher, to whom his house is open like a home, which is both touching and a bit laughable. He recently paid a hundred pounds for him, knowing he’ll never see that money again." C. D. to J. F. (25th of January, 1845.)
[97] "Do you think," he wrote from Ronciglione on the 29th January, "in your state room, when the fog makes your white blinds yellow, and the wind howls in the brick and mortar gulf behind that square perspective, with a middle distance of two ladder-tops and a background of Drury-lane sky—when the wind howls, I say, as if its eldest brother, born in Lincoln's-inn-fields, had gone to sea and was making a fortune on the Atlantic—at such times do you ever think of houseless Dick?"
[97] "Do you ever think," he wrote from Ronciglione on January 29th, "about your room when the fog makes your white curtains look yellow, and the wind screams in the space behind that square view, with the tops of two ladders in the middle and the Drury Lane sky in the background— when the wind screams, I mean, as if its oldest brother, who grew up in Lincoln's Inn Fields, had gone out to sea and was making a fortune on the Atlantic— do you ever think about houseless Dick at times like that?"
[98] He makes no mention in his book of the pauper burial-place at Naples, to which the reference made in his letters is striking enough for preservation. "In Naples, the burying place of the poor people is a great paved yard with three hundred and sixty-five pits in it: every one covered by a square stone which is fastened down. One of these pits is opened every night in the year; the bodies of the pauper dead are collected in the city; brought out in a cart (like that I told you of at Rome); and flung in, uncoffined. Some lime is then cast down into the pit; and it is sealed up until a year is past, and its turn again comes round. Every night there is a pit opened; and every night that same pit is sealed up again, for a twelvemonth. The cart has a red lamp attached, and at about ten o'clock at night you see it glaring through the streets of Naples: stopping at the doors of hospitals and prisons, and such places, to increase its freight: and then rattling off again. Attached to the new cemetery (a very pretty one, and well kept: immeasurably better in all respects than Père-la-Chaise) there is another similar yard, but not so large." . . . In connection with the same subject he adds: "About Naples, the dead are borne along the street, uncovered, on an open bier; which is sometimes hoisted on a sort of palanquin, covered with a cloth of scarlet and gold. This exposure of the deceased is not peculiar to that part of Italy; for about midway between Rome and Genoa we encountered a funeral procession attendant on the body of a woman, which was presented in its usual dress, to my eyes (looking from my elevated seat on the box of a travelling carriage) as if she were alive, and resting on her bed. An attendant priest was chanting lustily—and as badly as the priests invariably do. Their noise is horrible. . . ."
[98] He doesn’t mention in his book the burial ground for the poor in Naples, which is noted in his letters and is significant enough to be preserved. "In Naples, the burial place for low-income people is a large paved area with three hundred and sixty-five graves in it: each one covered by a square stone that is secured in place. One of these graves is opened every night of the year; the bodies of the deceased poor are collected from the city, taken out in a cart (like the one I mentioned in Rome); and unceremoniously dumped in. Some lime is then thrown into the grave; and it is sealed until a year has passed and it is its turn again. Each night, a grave is opened; and each night, that same grave is sealed up again for a whole year. The cart has a red lamp attached, and around ten o'clock at night, you can see it glowing through the streets of Naples: stopping at the doors of hospitals, prisons, and similar places to pick up more bodies; then rattling off again. Next to the new cemetery (which is very nice and well-maintained: far better in all respects than Père-la-Chaise), there’s another similar area, but not as large." . . . Related to this topic, he adds: "In and around Naples, the dead are carried through the streets uncovered on an open bier; which is sometimes lifted onto a kind of palanquin, covered with a scarlet and gold cloth. This exposure of the deceased isn't unique to that part of Italy; because halfway between Rome and Genoa, we encountered a funeral procession for a woman whose body was displayed in her normal attire, making it seem to me (looking from my elevated seat on the box of a traveling carriage) as though she were alive and resting on her bed. An attending priest was chanting loudly—and as poorly as priests usually do. Their noise is terrible. . . ."
[99] "Thackeray praises the people of Italy for being kind to brutes. There is probably no country in the world where they are treated with such frightful cruelty. It is universal." (Naples, 2nd. Feb. 1845.) Emphatic confirmation of this remark has been lately given by the Naples correspondent of the Times, writing under date of February 1872.
[99] "Thackeray commends the Italian people for their kindness towards animals. There’s likely no place on Earth where they face such terrible cruelty. It’s widespread." (Naples, Feb. 2, 1845.) This statement was strongly reiterated recently by the Naples correspondent of the Times, who wrote on February 1872.
[100] The reader will perhaps think with me that what he noticed, on the roads in Tuscany more than in any others, of wayside crosses and religious memorials, may be worth preserving. . . . "You know that in the streets and corners of roads, there are all sorts of crosses and similar memorials to be seen in Italy. The most curious are, I think, in Tuscany. There is very seldom a figure on the cross, though there is sometimes a face; but they are remarkable for being garnished with little models in wood of every possible object that can be connected with the Saviour's death. The cock that crowed when Peter had denied his master thrice, is generally perched on the tip-top; and an ornithological phenomenon he always is. Under him is the inscription. Then, hung on to the cross-beam, are the spear, the reed with the sponge of vinegar and water at the end, the coat without seam for which the soldiers cast lots, the dice-box with which they threw for it, the hammer that drove in the nails, the pincers that pulled them out, the ladder which was set against the cross, the crown of thorns, the instrument of flagellation, the lantern with which Mary went to the tomb—I suppose; I can think of no other—and the sword with which Peter smote the high priest's servant. A perfect toyshop of little objects; repeated at every four or five miles all along the highway."
[100] The reader might agree with me that what he notices on the roads in Tuscany, more than anywhere else, with all the wayside crosses and religious memorials, deserves to be preserved. . . . "You know that in the streets and at the corners of roads, there are all sorts of crosses and similar memorials to be seen in Italy. The most interesting ones are, I think, in Tuscany. There’s rarely a figure on the cross, though sometimes there’s a face; but they stand out for being decorated with little wooden models of every imaginable object related to the Savior's death. The rooster that crowed when Peter denied his master three times is usually perched right on top, and it’s always some kind of bird. Below it is the inscription. Then, hanging from the crossbeam, are the spear, the reed with the sponge soaked in vinegar and water at the end, the seamless coat for which the soldiers cast lots, the dice box they used to gamble for it, the hammer that drove in the nails, the pincers that pulled them out, the ladder that was leaned against the cross, the crown of thorns, the whip used for flogging, the lantern with which Mary went to the tomb—I assume; I can’t think of anything else—and the sword with which Peter struck the high priest's servant. A complete toy shop of little objects, repeated every four or five miles along the highway."
[101] Of his visit to Fiesole I have spoken in my Life of Landor. "Ten years after Landor had lost this home, an Englishman travelling in Italy, his friend and mine, visited the neighbourhood for his sake, drove out from Florence to Fiesole, and asked his coachman which was the villa in which the Landor family lived. 'He was a dull dog, and pointed to Boccaccio's. I didn't believe him. He was so deuced ready that I knew he lied. I went up to the convent, which is on a height, and was leaning over a dwarf wall basking in the noble view over a vast range of hill and valley, when a little peasant girl came up and began to point out the localities. Ecco la villa Landora! was one of the first half-dozen sentences she spoke. My heart swelled as Landor's would have done when I looked down upon it, nestling among its olive-trees and vines, and with its upper windows (there are five above the door) open to the setting sun. Over the centre of these there is another story, set upon the housetop like a tower; and all Italy, except its sea, is melted down into the glowing landscape it commands. I plucked a leaf of ivy from the convent-garden as I looked; and here it is. 'For Landor. With my love.' So wrote Mr. Dickens to me from Florence on the and of April 1845; and when I turned over Landor's papers in the same month after an interval of exactly twenty years, the ivy-leaf was found carefully enclosed, with the letter in which I had sent it." Dickens had asked him before leaving what he would most wish to have in remembrance of Italy. "An ivy-leaf from Fiesole," said Landor.
[101] I talked about his visit to Fiesole in my Landor's Life. "Ten years after Landor lost his home, an Englishman traveling in Italy, who was both a friend of his and mine, came to the area because of him, drove out from Florence to Fiesole, and asked his coachman which villa the Landor family lived in. 'He was a dull guy,' and pointed to Boccaccio's. I didn’t believe him. He was so eager that I knew he was lying. I went up to the convent, which is on a hill, and was leaning over a low wall enjoying the stunning view of the vast hills and valleys when a little peasant girl came over and started to point out places. Ecco la villa Landora! was one of the first few sentences she said. My heart swelled as Landor’s would have when I looked down upon it, nestled among its olive trees and vines, with its upper windows (there are five above the door) open to the setting sun. Above these, there’s another story sitting on the roof like a tower; and all of Italy, except for its sea, is transformed into the beautiful landscape it overlooks. I picked an ivy leaf from the convent garden as I looked; and here it is. 'For Landor. With my love.' That's what Mr. Dickens wrote to me from Florence on the 2nd of April 1845; and when I went through Landor's papers that same month after an exact interval of twenty years, the ivy leaf was found carefully enclosed with the letter I had sent it with." Dickens had asked him before leaving what he would most like to remember Italy by. "An ivy leaf from Fiesole," Landor said.
[102] One message sent me, though all to whom it refers have now passed away, I please myself by thinking may still, where he might most have desired it, be the occasion of pleasure. ". . . Give my love to Colden, and tell him if he leaves London before I return I will ever more address him and speak of him as Colonel Colden. Kate sends her love to him also, and we both entreat him to say all the affectionate things he can spare for third parties—using so many himself—when he writes to Mrs. Colden: whom you ought to know, for she, as I have often told you, is brilliant. I would go five hundred miles to see her for five minutes. I am deeply grieved by poor Felton's loss. His letter is manly, and of a most rare kind in the dignified composure and silence of his sorrow." (See Vol. I. p. 315).
[102] One message I received, even though everyone it mentions has now passed away, makes me feel good thinking it might still bring some joy where he would have wanted it most. "... Send my love to Colden, and let him know that if he leaves London before I come back, I will always refer to him as Colonel Colden. Kate also sends her love to him, and we both ask him to share all the kind things he can with others—since he uses so many himself—when he writes to Mrs. Colden: you should know her because, as I have often said, she is awesome. I would travel five hundred miles just to see her for five minutes. I am really saddened by poor Felton's loss. His letter is strong and stands out for the dignified calmness and silence of his grief." (See Vol. I. p. 315).
[103] "It matters little now," says Dickens, after describing this incident in one of his minor writings, "for coaches of all colours are alike to poor Kindheart, and he rests far north of the little cemetery with the cypress trees, by the city walls where the Mediterranean is so beautiful." What was said on a former page (ante, 182) may here be completed by a couple of stories told to Dickens by Mr. Walton, suggestive strongly of the comment that it required indeed a kind heart and many attractive qualities (which undoubtedly Fletcher possessed) to render tolerable such eccentricities. Dickens made one of these stories wonderfully amusing. It related the introduction by Fletcher of an unknown Englishman to the marble-merchant's house; the stay there of the Englishman, unasked, for ten days; and finally the walking off of the Englishman in a shirt, pair of stockings, neckcloth, pocket-handkerchief, and other etceteras belonging to Mr. Walton, which never reappeared after that hour. On another occasion, Fletcher confessed to Mr. Walton his having given a bill to a man in Carrara for £30; and the marble-merchant having asked, "And pray, Fletcher, have you arranged to meet it when it falls due?" Fletcher at once replied, "Yes," and to the marble-merchant's farther enquiry "how?" added, in his politest manner, "I have arranged to blow my brains out the day before!" The poor fellow did afterwards almost as much self-violence without intending it, dying of fever caught in night-wanderings through Liverpool half-clothed amid storms of rain.
[103] "It doesn't really matter now," Dickens says after recounting this incident in one of his lesser-known works, "because all coaches look the same to poor Kindheart, and he rests far north of the little cemetery with the cypress trees, next to the city walls where the Mediterranean is so beautiful." What was mentioned on a previous page (ante, 182) can be completed here with a couple of stories shared with Dickens by Mr. Walton, strongly hinting that it truly took a kind heart and many appealing qualities (which Fletcher definitely had) to put up with such oddities. Dickens made one of these stories incredibly funny. It involved Fletcher introducing an unknown Englishman to the marble merchant's house; the Englishman staying there, uninvited, for ten days; and finally, the Englishman leaving in a shirt, a pair of stockings, a necktie, a handkerchief, and other belongings of Mr. Walton's that never turned up again after that. On another occasion, Fletcher admitted to Mr. Walton that he had given a man in Carrara a bill for £30; when the marble merchant asked, "And by the way, Fletcher, have you made arrangements to cover it when it comes due?" Fletcher immediately answered, "Yes," and when the marble merchant asked "how?" he replied, in the politest way, "I’ve arranged to blow my brains out the day before!" The poor guy later did almost as much harm to himself without meaning to, dying from a fever he caught while wandering Liverpool half-clothed during rainstorms.
[105] A remark on this, made in my reply, elicited what follows in a letter during his travel home: "Odd enough that remark of yours. I had been wondering at Rome that Juvenal (which I have been always lugging out of a bag, on all occasions) never used the fire-flies for an illustration. But even now, they are only partially seen; and no where I believe in such enormous numbers as on the Mediterranean coast-road, between Genoa and Spezzia. I will ascertain for curiosity's sake, whether there are any at this time in Rome, or between it and the country-house of Mæcenas—on the ground of Horace's journey. I know there is a place on the French side of Genoa, where they begin at a particular boundary-line, and are never seen beyond it. . . . All wild to see you at Brussels! What a meeting we will have, please God!"
[105] A comment I made in my response sparked this in a letter he wrote while traveling home: "Your remark is quite interesting. I had just been thinking in Rome that Juvenal (which I always seem to pull out of my bag) never used fireflies as an example. Even now, they can only be seen in limited numbers; and I don’t think they exist in such huge quantities anywhere as they do along the Mediterranean coast road, between Genoa and Spezzia. I’m going to check out of curiosity if there are any right now in Rome, or between it and Mæcenas’ country house—considering Horace's journey. I know there’s a spot on the French side of Genoa where they appear starting from a certain boundary, and they’re never seen beyond it. . . . I'm so excited to see you in Brussels! We’re going to have such a great meeting, God willing!"
[106] Count d'Orsay's note about Roche, replying to Dickens's recommendation of him at his return, has touches of the pleasantry, wit, and kindliness that gave such a wonderful fascination to its writer. "Gore House, 6 July, 1845. Mon cher Dickens, Nous sommes enchantés de votre retour. Voici, thank God, Devonshire Place ressuscité. Venez luncheoner demain à 1 heure, et amenez notre brave ami Forster. J'attends la perle fine des couriers. Vous l'immortalisez par ce certificat—la difficulté sera de trouver un maître digne de lui. J'essayerai de tout mon cœur. La Reine devroit le prendre pour aller en Saxe Gotha, car je suis convaincu qu'il est assez intelligent pour pouvoir découvrir ce Royaume. Gore House vous envoye un cargo d'amitiés des plus sincères. Donnez de ma part 100,000 kind regards à Madame Dickens. Toujours votre affectionné, Ce D'Orsay. J'ai vu le courier, c'est le tableau de l'honnêteté, et de la bonne humeur. Don't forget to be here at one to-morrow, with Forster."
[106] Count d'Orsay's note about Roche, replying to Dickens's recommendation of him upon his return, shows the charm, humor, and warmth that made its writer so captivating. "Gore House, July 6, 1845. Dear Dickens,, We are delighted by your return. Thank God, Devonshire Place has come back to life. Come for lunch tomorrow at 1 o'clock, and bring our good friend Forster. I’m waiting for the finest gem of couriers. You immortalize him with this certification—the challenge will be finding a master worthy of him. I will try my best. The Queen should take him to go to Saxe Gotha, as I believe he is clever enough to uncover that Kingdom. Gore House sends you a shipment of the warmest friendships. Please give 100,000 kind regards to Mrs. Dickens from me. Always your affectionate, This D'Orsay museum. I’ve seen the courier; he’s the picture of honesty and good humor. Don't forget to be here at one tomorrow, with Forster."
[107] "Look here! Enclosed are two packets—a large one and a small one. The small one, read first. It contains Stanny's renunciation as an actor!!! After receiving it, at dinner time to-day" (22nd of August), "I gave my brains a shake, and thought of George Cruikshank. After much shaking, I made up the big packet, wherein I have put the case in the artfullest manner. R-r-r-r-ead it! as a certain Captain whom you know observes." The great artist was not for that time procurable, having engagements away from London, and Mr. Dudley Costello was substituted; Stanfield taking off the edge of his desertion as an actor by doing valuable work in management and scenery.
[107] "Look! Attached are two packets—a big one and a small one. Read the small one first. It has Stanny's resignation as an actor!!! After I got it, at dinner time today" (22nd of August), "I shook my thoughts around and thought of George Cruikshank. After a lot of thinking, I packed up the big envelope, where I've laid out the case in the most clever way. R-r-r-r-ead it! as a certain Captain you know says." The great artist was unavailable at that time due to other commitments outside of London, so Mr. Dudley Costello stepped in; Stanfield softened the blow of his exit from acting by doing valuable work in management and scenery.
[108] Characteristic glimpse of this Broadstairs holiday is afforded by a letter of the 19th of August 1845. "Perhaps it is a fair specimen of the odd adventures which befall the inimitable, that the cab in which the children and the luggage were (I and my womankind being in the other) got its shafts broken in the city, last Friday morning, through the horse stumbling on the greasy pavement; and was drawn to the wharf (about a mile) by a stout man, amid such frightful howlings and derisive yellings on the part of an infuriated populace, as I never heard before. Conceive the man in the broken shafts with his back towards the cab; all the children looking out of the windows; and the muddy portmanteaus and so forth (which were all tumbled down when the horse fell) tottering and nodding on the box! The best of it was, that our cabman, being an intimate friend of the damaged cabman, insisted on keeping him company; and proceeded at a solemn walk, in front of the procession; thereby securing to me a liberal share of the popular curiosity and congratulation. . . . Everything here at Broadstairs is the same as of old. I have walked 20 miles a day since I came down, and I went to a circus at Ramsgate on Saturday night, where Mazeppa was played in three long acts without an H in it: as if for a wager. Evven, and edds, and errors, and ands, were as plentiful as blackberries; but the letter H was neither whispered in Evven, nor muttered in Ell, nor permitted to dwell in any form on the confines of the sawdust." With this I will couple another theatrical experience of this holiday, when he saw a Giant played by a village comedian with a quite Gargantuesque felicity, and singled out for my admiration his fine manner of sitting down to a hot supper (of children), with the self-lauding exalting remark, by way of grace, "How pleasant is a quiet conscience and an approving mind!"
[108] A classic glimpse of this Broadstairs holiday comes from a letter dated August 19, 1845. "It’s perhaps a good example of the odd adventures that happen to the inimitable that the cab carrying the kids and luggage (while I and the women were in the other cab) had its shafts broken in the city last Friday morning when the horse stumbled on the slippery pavement; and was pulled to the wharf (about a mile) by a stout man, amid such terrifying howls and mocking shouts from an enraged crowd that I’ve never heard before. Picture the guy with the broken shafts facing away from the cab; all the kids peering out of the windows; and the muddy suitcases and other things (which had all fallen out when the horse collapsed) wobbling and bouncing on the roof! The funniest part was that our cab driver, being a close friend of the injured cab driver, insisted on accompanying him and walked solemnly in front of the procession; thus ensuring I received a generous share of the crowd’s curious stares and congratulations. . . . Everything here at Broadstairs remains unchanged. I've been walking 20 miles a day since I arrived, and I went to a circus in Ramsgate on Saturday night, where Mazeppa was performed in three long acts with not a single H to be found: almost as if it were a bet. Evven, and edds, and errors, and ands, were as plentiful as blackberries; but the letter H was neither whispered in Evven, nor muttered in Ell, nor allowed to appear in any form anywhere near the sawdust." Along with this, I’ll share another theatrical experience from this holiday when I watched a giant portrayed by a local comedian with quite a Gargantuan flair, and I admired his amusing way of sitting down to a hot supper (of children), with the self-praising remark, as a kind of grace, "How pleasant is a quiet conscience and an approving mind!"
[110] "The green woods and green shades about here," he says in another letter, "are more like Cobham in Kent, than anything we dream of at the foot of the Alpine passes."
[110] "The green forests and shaded areas around here," he says in another letter, "are more like Cobham in Kent than anything we imagine at the base of the Alpine passes."
[111] To these the heat interposed occasional difficulties. "Setting off last night" (5th of July) "at six o'clock, in accordance with my usual custom, for a long walk, I was really quite floored when I got to the top of a long steep hill leading out of the town—the same by which we entered it. I believe the great heats, however, seldom last more than a week at a time; there are always very long twilights, and very delicious evenings; and now that there is moonlight, the nights are wonderful. The peacefulness and grandeur of the Mountains and the Lake are indescribable. There comes a rush of sweet smells with the morning air too, which is quite peculiar to the country."
[111] The heat often caused some challenges. "Last night" (July 5th), "I set out at six o'clock, as I usually do, for a long walk, and I was really taken aback when I reached the top of a long, steep hill that leads out of town—the same one we came in by. I believe these intense heat waves usually only last about a week; the twilights are always long, and the evenings are really pleasant. And now that there's moonlight, the nights are amazing. The tranquility and beauty of the Mountains and the Lake are beyond words. In the morning air, there's a rush of sweet scents that are unique to this area."
[112] "One of her brothers by the bye, now dead, had large property in Ireland—all Nenagh, and the country about; and Cerjat told me, as we were talking about one thing and another, that when he went over there for some months to arrange the widow's affairs, he procured a copy of the curse which had been read at the altar by the parish priest of Nenagh, against any of the flock who didn't subscribe to the O'Connell tribute."
[112] "One of her brothers, by the way, now deceased, owned a lot of land in Ireland—all of Nenagh and the surrounding area; and Cerjat mentioned to me, while we were chatting about various topics, that when he went over there for a few months to sort out the widow's affairs, he got a copy of the curse that was pronounced at the altar by the parish priest of Nenagh, aimed at anyone from the congregation who didn’t contribute to the O'Connell tribute."
[113] In a note may be preserved another passage from the same letter. "I have been queer and had trembling legs for the last week. But it has been almost impossible to sleep at night. There is a breeze to-day (25th of July) and I hope another storm is coming up. . . . There is a theatre here; and whenever a troop of players pass through the town, they halt for a night and act. On the day of our tremendous dinner party of eight, there was an infant phenomenon; whom I should otherwise have seen. Last night there was a Vaudeville company; and Charley, Roche, and Anne went. The Brave reports the performances to have resembled Greenwich Fair. . . . There are some Promenade Concerts in the open air in progress now: but as they are just above one part of our garden we don't go: merely sitting outside the door instead, and hearing it all where we are. . . . Mont Blanc has been very plain lately. One heap of snow. A Frenchman got to the top, the other day."
[113] In a note, another section from the same letter can be found. "I've been feeling strange and had shaky legs for the past week. But it's been nearly impossible to sleep at night. There’s a breeze today (July 25th), and I’m hoping another storm is on its way. . . . There’s a theater here, and whenever a group of performers comes through town, they stop for a night and perform. On the day of our big dinner party with eight people, there was a child prodigy I would have otherwise seen. Last night there was a Vaudeville company, and Charley, Roche, and Anne went to see it. The Brave says the performances were like Greenwich Fair. . . . There are some open-air Promenade Concerts happening now, but since they’re just above one part of our garden, we don’t go; we just sit outside the door instead and listen from where we are. . . . Mont Blanc has been very visible lately. Just one big patch of snow. A Frenchman reached the top the other day."
For in that sleep of death what dreams may come,
When we have shuffled off this mortal coil. . . ."
[115] This was an abstract, in plain language for the use of his children, of the narrative in the Four Gospels. Allusion was made, shortly after his death, to the existence of such a manuscript, with expression of a wish that it might be published; but nothing would have shocked himself so much as any suggestion of that kind. The little piece was of a peculiarly private character, written for his children, and exclusively and strictly for their use only.
[115] This was a simplified version of the stories from the Four Gospels, written in clear language for his kids. Shortly after his death, there were mentions of this manuscript and a desire to publish it; however, nothing would have upset him more than the idea of that. The short piece was intended to be very personal, written just for his children, and only for them to use.
[116] So he described it. "I do not think," he adds, "we could have fallen on better society. It is a small circle certainly, but quite large enough. The Watsons improve very much on acquaintance. Everybody is very well informed; and we are all as social and friendly as people can be, and very merry. We play whist with great dignity and gravity sometimes, interrupted only by the occasional facetiousness of the inimitable."
[116] So he described it. "I don't think," he adds, "we could have found better company. It’s definitely a small group, but still plenty big. The Watsons get better the more you get to know them. Everyone is really well-informed, and we’re all as social and friendly as can be, and very cheerful. We play whist with a lot of dignity and seriousness at times, only interrupted by the occasional humor of the inimitable."
[117] "When it is very hot, it is hotter than in Italy. The over-hanging roofs of the houses, and the quantity of wood employed in their construction (where they use tile and brick in Italy), render them perfect forcing-houses. The walls and floors, hot to the hand all the night through, interfere with sleep; and thunder is almost always booming and rumbling among the mountains." Besides this, though there were no mosquitoes as in Genoa, there was at first a plague of flies, more distressing even than at Albaro. "They cover everything eatable, fall into everything drinkable, stagger into the wet ink of newly-written words and make tracks on the writing paper, clog their legs in the lather on your chin while you are shaving in the morning, and drive you frantic at any time when there is daylight if you fall asleep."
[117] "When it’s really hot, it’s hotter than in Italy. The overhanging roofs of the houses and the amount of wood used in their construction (where they use tile and brick in Italy) make them perfect greenhouses. The walls and floors, warm to the touch all night long, disrupt sleep; and thunder is almost always rumbling among the mountains." In addition, although there were no mosquitoes like in Genoa, there was initially a swarm of flies, which was even more bothersome than in Albaro. "They cover everything edible, fall into everything drinkable, stumble into the wet ink of freshly written pages and leave smudges on the paper, get stuck in the lather on your chin while you’re shaving in the morning, and drive you crazy at any time during the day if you happen to doze off."
[118] His preceding letter had sketched his landlord for me. . . . "There was an annual child's fête at the Signal the other night: given by the town. It was beautiful to see perhaps a hundred couple of children dancing in an immense ring in a green wood. Our three eldest were among them, presided over by my landlord, who was 18 years in the English navy, and is the Sous Prefet of the town—a very good fellow indeed; quite an Englishman. Our landlady, nearly twice his age, used to keep the Inn (a famous one) at Zurich: and having made £50,000 bestowed it on a young husband. She might have done worse."
[118] His earlier letter had painted a picture of his landlord for me. . . . "There was an annual children's festival at the Signal the other night, organized by the town. It was wonderful to see maybe a hundred pairs of children dancing in a huge circle in a green forest. Our three oldest were among them, led by my landlord, who spent 18 years in the English navy and is the deputy mayor of the town—a really good guy; very much an Englishman. Our landlady, who is nearly twice his age, used to run the Inn (a famous one) in Zurich: and having made £50,000, she gave it to a young husband. She could have done worse."
[119] The close of this letter sent family remembrances in characteristic form. "Kate, Georgy, Mamey, Katey, Charley, Walley, Chickenstalker, and Sampson Brass, commend themselves unto your Honour's loving remembrance." The last but one, who continued long to bear the name, was Frank; the last, who very soon will be found to have another, was Alfred.
[119] The end of this letter included family greetings in its usual style. "Kate, Georgy, Mamey, Katey, Charley, Walley, Chickenstalker, and Sampson Brass send their love and best wishes to you." The second to last, who kept the name for a long time, was Frank; the last, who will soon have a different name, was Alfred.
[123] Out of the excitements consequent on the public festivities arose some domestic inconveniences. I will give one of them. "Fanchette the cook, distracted by the forthcoming fête, madly refused to buy a duck yesterday as ordered by the Brave, and a battle of life ensued between those two powers. The Brave is of opinion that 'datter woman have went mad.' But she seems calm to-day; and I suppose won't poison the family. . . ."
[123] Out of the excitement from the public celebrations came some domestic issues. Let me share one. "Fanchette the cook, overwhelmed by the upcoming party, stubbornly refused to buy a duck yesterday as the Brave had asked, leading to a showdown between the two. The Brave thinks that 'that woman has lost her mind.' But she seems calm today; I guess she won't poison the family. . . ."
[124] Where he makes remark also on a class of offences which are still most inadequately punished: "I hope you will follow up your idea about the defective state of the law in reference to women, by some remarks on the inadequate punishment of that ruffian flippantly called by the liners the Wholesale Matrimonial Speculator. My opinion is, that in any well-ordered state of society, and advanced spirit of social jurisprudence, he would have been flogged more than once (privately), and certainly sentenced to transportation for no less a term than the rest of his life. Surely the man who threw the woman out of window was no worse, if so bad."
[124] He also comments on a category of crimes that are still not punished severely enough: "I hope you'll follow up your thoughts on the flawed legal treatment of women with some remarks on the insufficient punishment of that jerk casually referred to by the media as the Wholesale Matrimonial Speculator. In my opinion, in any properly functioning society with a progressive legal system, he would have faced multiple private floggings and would definitely have been sentenced to life transportation. Surely the man who threw the woman out of the window was no worse, if not worse."
[125] Ten days before there had been a visit from Mr. Ainsworth and his daughters on their way to Geneva. "I breakfasted with him at the hotel Gibbon next morning and they dined here afterwards, and we walked about all day, talking of our old days at Kensal-lodge." The same letter told me: "We had a regatta at Ouchy the other day, mainly supported by the contributions of the English handfull. It concluded with a rowing-match by women, which was very funny. I wish you could have seen Roche appear on the Lake, rowing, in an immense boat, Cook, Anne, two nurses, Katey, Mamey, Walley, Chickenstalker, and Baby; no boatmen or other degrading assistance; and all sorts of Swiss tubs splashing about them . . . Senior is coming here to-morrow, I believe, with his wife; and they talk of Brunel and his wife as on their way. We dine at Haldimand's to meet Senior—which solitary and most interesting piece of intelligence is all the news I know of . . . Take care you don't back out of your Paris engagement; but that we really do have (please God) some happy hours there. Kate, Georgy, Mamey, Katey, Charley, Walley, Chickenstalker, and Baby, send loves. . . . I am all anxiety and fever to know what we start Dombey with!"
[125] Ten days earlier, Mr. Ainsworth and his daughters visited on their way to Geneva. "I had breakfast with him at the Gibbon hotel the next morning, and they dined here afterward. We spent the day walking around, reminiscing about our old days at Kensal-lodge." The same letter mentioned: "We had a regatta at Ouchy recently, mainly supported by contributions from a handful of English people. It ended with a rowing competition featuring women, which was quite entertaining. I wish you could have seen Roche on the Lake, rowing in a huge boat with Cook, Anne, two nurses, Katey, Mamey, Walley, Chickenstalker, and Baby; no boatmen or any other degrading help; and all sorts of Swiss boats splashing around them… Senior is coming here tomorrow, I believe, with his wife; and they say Brunel and his wife are on their way too. We're dining at Haldimand's to meet Senior—which is the only piece of interesting news I have… Please make sure you don’t back out of your Paris plans; I hope we really do have (God willing) some happy times there. Kate, Georgy, Mamey, Katey, Charley, Walley, Chickenstalker, and Baby send their love… I’m anxious and excited to know how we start Dombey!"
[127] Writing on Sunday he had said: "I hope to finish the second number to-morrow, and to send it off bodily by Tuesday's post. On Wednesday I purpose, please God, beginning the Battle of Life. I shall peg away at that, without turning aside to Dombey again; and if I can only do it within the month!" I had to warn him, on receiving these intimations, that he was trying too much.
[127] Writing on Sunday, he said: "I hope to finish the second issue tomorrow and send it out completely by Tuesday's mail. On Wednesday, I plan, God willing, to start the Battle of Life. I'm going to focus on that, without turning back to Dombey again; and if I can just manage it within the month!" I had to caution him, upon receiving this news, that he was taking on too much.
[128] The storm of rain formerly mentioned by him had not been repeated, but the weather had become unsettled, and he thus referred to the rainfall which made that summer so disastrous in England. "What a storm that must have been in London! I wish we could get something like it, here. . . . It is thundering while I write, but I fear it don't look black enough for a clearance. The echoes in the mountains are of such a stupendous sort, that a peal of thunder five or ten minutes long, is here the commonest of circumstances. . . ." That was early in August, and at the close of the month he wrote: "I forgot to tell you that yesterday week, at half-past 7 in the morning, we had a smart shock of an earthquake, lasting, perhaps, a quarter of a minute. It awoke me in bed. The sensation was so curious and unlike any other, that I called out at the top of my voice I was sure it was an earthquake."
[128] The heavy rain he mentioned before hadn’t happened again, but the weather had turned unpredictable, which he referred to regarding the rainfall that made that summer such a disaster in England. "What a storm that must have been in London! I wish we could experience something like that here... It’s thundering while I’m writing, but I worry it doesn’t look dark enough for a real downpour. The echoes in the mountains are so massive that a thunderclap lasting five or ten minutes is totally normal here..." That was early August, and by the end of the month he wrote: "I forgot to mention that last week, at 7:30 in the morning, we had a pretty strong earthquake that lasted maybe a quarter of a minute. It woke me up in bed. The feeling was so strange and unlike anything else that I shouted at the top of my lungs that I was sure it was an earthquake."
[129] "I may tell you," he wrote to me from Paris at the end of November, "now it is all over. I don't know whether it was the hot summer, or the anxiety of the two new books coupled with D. N. remembrances and reminders, but I was in that state in Switzerland, when my spirits sunk so, I felt myself in serious danger. Yet I had little pain in my side; excepting that time at Genoa I have hardly had any since poor Mary died, when it came on so badly; and I walked my fifteen miles a day constantly, at a great pace."
[129] "I can tell you," he wrote to me from Paris at the end of November, "that it's all over now. I’m not sure if it was the hot summer, or the pressure of two new books combined with memories of D. N., but I felt pretty low in Switzerland, like I was in serious trouble. Still, I’ve had little pain in my side; aside from that time in Genoa, I haven't experienced much since poor Mary passed away, when it hit me really hard; and I’ve been walking my fifteen miles a day consistently, at a good pace."
[130] It had also the mention of another floating fancy for the weekly periodical which was still and always present to his mind, and which settled down at last, as the reader knows, into Household Words. "As to the Review, I strongly incline to the notion of a kind of Spectator (Addison's)—very cheap, and pretty frequent. We must have it thoroughly discussed. It would be a great thing to found something. If the mark between a sort of Spectator, and a different sort of Athenæum, could be well hit, my belief is that a deal might be done. But it should be something with a marked and distinctive and obvious difference, in its design, from any other existing periodical."
[130] It also mentioned another idea for a weekly magazine that was constantly on his mind, which eventually, as the reader knows, became Household Words. "Regarding the Review, I'm really leaning towards creating something like a cheap, regular version of the Spectator (Addison's). We need to discuss it thoroughly. It could be a significant accomplishment to establish something new. If we can find a clear distinction between a type of Spectator and a different kind of Athenæum, I believe we could achieve a lot. But it should have a clear and noticeable difference in its purpose compared to any other existing magazine."
[131] Some smaller items of family news were in the same letter. "Mamey and Katey have come out in Parisian dresses, and look very fine. They are not proud, and send their loves. Skittles is cutting teeth, and gets cross towards evening. Frankey is smaller than ever, and Walter very large. Charley in statu quo. Everything is enormously dear. Fuel, stupendously so. In airing the house, we burnt five pounds' worth of firewood in one week!! We mix it with coal now, as we used to do in Italy, and find the fires much warmer. To warm the house thoroughly, this singular habitation requires fires on the ground floor. We burn three. . . ."
[131] Some smaller pieces of family news were in the same letter. "Mamey and Katey are wearing Parisian dresses now, and they look great. They're not stuck up and send their love. Skittles is teething and gets cranky in the evening. Frankey is tinier than ever, and Walter has grown quite large. Charley is just the same. Everything is super expensive. Fuel is ridiculously so. While airing out the house, we went through five pounds’ worth of firewood in just a week!! We’re mixing it with coal now, like we used to do in Italy, and it makes the fires much warmer. To really warm up the house, this peculiar place needs fires on the ground floor. We burn three... "
[133] Dickens's first letter after my return described it to me. "Do you remember my writing a letter to the prefet of police about that coachman? I heard no more about it until this very day" (12th of February), "when, at the moment of your letter arriving, Roche put his head in at the door (I was busy writing in the Baronial drawing-room) and said, 'Here is datter cocher!'—Sir, he had been in prison ever since! and being released this morning, was sent by the police to pay back the franc and a half, and to beg pardon, and to get a certificate that he had done so, or he could not go on the stand again! Isn't this admirable? But the culminating point of the story (it could happen with nobody but me) is that he was drunk when he came!! Not very, but his eye was fixed, and he swayed in his sabots, and smelt of wine, and told Roche incoherently that he wouldn't have done it (committed the offence, that is) if the people hadn't made him. He seemed to be troubled with a phantasmagorial belief that all Paris had gathered round us that night in the Rue St. Honoré, and urged him on with frantic shouts. . . . Snow, frost, and cold. . . . The Duke of Bordeaux is very well, and dines at the Tuileries to-morrow. . . . When I have done, I will write you a brilliant letter. . . . Loves from all. . . . Your blue and golden bed looks desolate." The allusion to the Duc de Bordeaux was to remind me pleasantly of a slip of his own during our talk with Chateaubriand, when, at a loss to say something interesting to the old royalist, he bethought him to enquire with sympathy when he had last seen the representative of the elder branch of Bourbons, as if he were resident in the city then and there!
[133] Dickens's first letter after my return described it to me. "Do you remember me writing a letter to the police chief about that coachman? I hadn’t heard anything about it until today" (February 12th), "when, just as your letter arrived, Roche popped his head in the door (I was busy writing in the Baronial drawing-room) and said, 'Here is that coachman!'—Sir, he had been in jail all this time! And being released this morning, he was sent by the police to repay the franc and a half, apologize, and get a certificate that he had done so, or he couldn’t work again! Isn’t that amazing? But the best part of the story (it could only happen to me) is that he was drunk when he arrived!! Not really drunk, but his eyes were glassy, he swayed in his wooden shoes, smelled of wine, and incoherently told Roche that he wouldn’t have done it (committed the offense, that is) if the people hadn’t egged him on. He seemed to be under the illusion that all of Paris had gathered around us that night in the Rue St. Honoré, urging him on with wild shouts. . . . Snow, frost, and cold. . . . The Duke of Bordeaux is doing well and is having dinner at the Tuileries tomorrow. . . . Once I finish this, I’ll write you a great letter. . . . Love from everyone. . . . Your blue and gold bed looks lonely." The mention of the Duc de Bordeaux was meant to pleasantly remind me of a slip he made during our talk with Chateaubriand, when, at a loss for something interesting to say to the old royalist, he thought to ask sympathetically when he last saw the representative of the older branch of the Bourbons, as if he were living in the city then and there!
[134] This was on Sunday, the 21st of February, when a party were assembled of whom I think the French Emperor, his cousin the Prince Napoleon, Doctor Quin, Dickens's eldest son, and myself, are now the only survivors. Lady Blessington had received the day before from her brother Major Power, who held a military appointment in Hobart Town, a small oil-painting of a girl's face by the murderer Wainewright (mentioned on a former page as having been seen by us together in Newgate), who was among the convicts there under sentence of transportation, and who had contrived somehow to put the expression of his own wickedness into the portrait of a nice kind-hearted girl. Major Power knew nothing of the man's previous history at this time, and had employed him on the painting out of a sort of charity. As soon as the truth went back, Wainewright was excluded from houses before open to him, and shortly after died very miserably. What Reynolds said of portrait painting, to explain its frequent want of refinement, that a man could only put into a face what he had in himself, was forcibly shown in this incident. The villain's story altogether moved Dickens to the same interest as it had excited in another profound student of humanity (Sir Edward Lytton), and, as will be seen, he also introduced him into one of his later writings.
[134] This was on Sunday, February 21st, when a group gathered, of whom I believe the French Emperor, his cousin Prince Napoleon, Dr. Quin, Dickens's eldest son, and I are now the only survivors. Lady Blessington had received the day before from her brother Major Power, who had a military position in Hobart Town, a small oil painting of a girl's face by the murderer Wainewright (mentioned earlier as having been seen by us together in Newgate), who was among the convicts sentenced to transportation and somehow managed to infuse his own wickedness into the portrait of a sweet, kind-hearted girl. At that time, Major Power knew nothing of the man's past and had hired him for the painting out of a sort of charity. Once the truth came to light, Wainewright was shut out from houses that had previously welcomed him, and shortly after, he died very miserably. What Reynolds said about portrait painting, explaining its often rough quality—that a person could only depict in a face what they had inside them—was vividly illustrated in this incident. The villain's story entirely captivated Dickens just as it had another deep thinker of human nature (Sir Edward Lytton), and, as will be seen, he also included him in one of his later works.
[135] ". . . I am horrified to find that the first chapter makes at least two pages less than I had supposed, and I have a terrible apprehension that there will not be copy enough for the number! As it could not possibly come out short, and as there would be no greater possibility of sending to me, in this short month, to supply what may be wanted, I decide—after the first burst of nervousness is gone—to follow this letter by Diligence to-morrow morning. The malle poste is full for days and days. I shall hope to be with you some time on Friday." C. D. to J. F. Paris: Wednesday, 17th February, 1847.
[135] ". . . I'm shocked to realize that the first chapter is at least two pages shorter than I thought, and I’m really worried that there won't be enough content for the issue! Since it can’t possibly come out short, and since there's no chance of sending me anything in this brief month to fill in what might be needed, I’ve decided—after I've calmed down a bit—to send this letter by Diligence tomorrow morning. The mail system is packed for days. I hope to be with you sometime on Friday." C. D. to J. F. Paris: Wednesday, 17th February, 1847.
[136] "He had already laid his hand upon the bell-rope to convey his usual summons to Richards, when his eye fell upon a writing-desk, belonging to his deceased wife, which had been taken, among other things, from a cabinet in her chamber. It was not the first time that his eye had lighted on it. He carried the key in his pocket; and he brought it to his table and opened it now—having previously locked the room door—with a well accustomed hand.
[136] "He was about to pull the bell-rope to call for Richards when he noticed a writing desk belonging to his late wife that had been taken from her cabinet. This wasn't the first time he had seen it. He had the key in his pocket, so he brought it to his table and opened it—after locking the room door—with a familiar hand.
"From beneath a heap of torn and cancelled scraps of paper, he took one letter that remained entire. Involuntarily holding his breath as he opened this document, and 'bating in the stealthy action something of his arrogant demeanour, he sat down, resting his head upon one hand, and read it through.
"From under a pile of ripped and discarded pieces of paper, he pulled out one letter that was still intact. He involuntarily held his breath as he opened this document, and in that sneaky moment, something of his arrogant attitude faded away. He sat down, resting his head on one hand, and read it all the way through."
"He read it slowly and attentively, and with a nice particularity to every syllable. Otherwise than as his great deliberation seemed unnatural, and perhaps the result of an effort equally great, he allowed no sign of emotion to escape him. When he had read it through, he folded and refolded it slowly several times, and tore it carefully into fragments. Checking his hand in the act of throwing these away, he put them in his pocket, as if unwilling to trust them even to the chances of being reunited and deciphered; and instead of ringing, as usual, for little Paul, he sat solitary all the evening in his cheerless room." From the original MS. of Dombey and Son.
"He read it slowly and carefully, paying close attention to every syllable. Aside from the fact that his intense focus seemed unusual and possibly the result of a considerable effort, he showed no signs of emotion. Once he finished reading, he folded and refolded the paper several times before tearing it into small pieces. Just as he was about to throw them away, he hesitated and put them in his pocket, as if he didn’t want to risk them being put back together or read again. Instead of calling for little Paul, like he usually did, he spent the entire evening alone in his bleak room." From the original MS. of Dombey and Son.
[137] "I will now explain that 'Oliver Twist,' the ——, the ——, etc" (naming books by another writer), "were produced in an entirely different manner from what would be considered as the usual course; for I, the Artist, suggested to the Authors of those works the original idea, or subject, for them to write out—furnishing, at the same time, the principal characters and the scenes. And then, as the tale had to be produced in monthly parts, the Writer, or Author, and the Artist, had every month to arrange and settle what scenes, or subjects, and characters were to be introduced, and the Author had to weave in such scenes as I wished to represent."—The Artist and the Author, by George Cruikshank, p. 15. (Bell & Daldy: 1872.) The italics are Mr. Cruikshank's own.
[137] "I will now explain that 'Oliver Twist,' the ——, the ——, etc." (naming books by another writer), "were created in a completely different way than what would be seen as normal; because I, the Artist, proposed the original idea or subject for the Authors of those works to write about—providing, at the same time, the main characters and scenes. And since the story had to be published in monthly installments, the Writer, or Author, and the Artist had to coordinate each month on what scenes, subjects, and characters would be included, and the Author had to integrate the scenes that I wanted to portray."—The Artist and the Author, by George Cruikshank, p. 15. (Bell & Daldy: 1872.) The italics are Mr. Cruikshank's own.
[138] I take, from his paper of notes for the number, the various names, beginning with that of her real prototype, out of which the name selected came to him at last. "Mrs. Roylance . . . House at the seaside. Mrs. Wrychin. Mrs. Tipchin. Mrs. Alchin. Mrs. Somching. Mrs. Pipchin." See Vol. I. p. 55.
[139] Some passages may be subjoined from the letter, as it does not appear among those printed by Lord Cockburn. "Edinburgh, 14th December, '46. My dear, dear Dickens!—and dearer every day, as you every day give me more pleasure and do me more good! You do not wonder at this style? for you know that I have been in love with you, ever since Nelly! and I do not care now who knows it. . . . The Dombeys, my dear D! how can I thank you enough for them! The truth, and the delicacy, and the softness and depth of the pathos in that opening death-scene, could only come from one hand; and the exquisite taste which spares all details, and breaks off just when the effect is at its height, is wholly yours. But it is Florence on whom my hopes chiefly repose; and in her I see the promise of another Nelly! though reserved, I hope, for a happier fate, and destined to let us see what a grown-up female angel is like. I expect great things, too, from Walter, who begins charmingly, and will be still better I fancy than young Nickleby, to whom as yet he bears most resemblance. I have good hopes too of Susan Nipper, who I think has great capabilities, and whom I trust you do not mean to drop. Dombey is rather too hateful, and strikes me as a mitigated Jonas, without his brutal coarseness and ruffian ferocity. I am quite in the dark as to what you mean to make of Paul, but shall watch his development with interest. About Miss Tox, and her Major, and the Chicks, perhaps I do not care enough. But you know I always grudge the exquisite painting you waste on such portraits. I love the Captain, tho', and his hook, as much as you can wish; and look forward to the future appearances of Carker Junior, with expectations which I know will not be disappointed. . . ."
[139] Some parts may be added from the letter since it's not included in the ones published by Lord Cockburn. "Edinburgh, 14th December, '46. My dear, dear Dickens!—and dearer every day, as you give me more pleasure and do me more good each day! You’re not surprised by this style, right? You know I've been in love with you since Nelly! I don’t care anymore who knows it. . . . The Dombeys, my dear D! How can I thank you enough for them! The truth, the delicacy, and the deep emotion in that opening death scene could only come from you; and your exquisite taste, which avoids all details and stops right when the effect is strongest, is entirely yours. But it’s Florence on whom my hopes mainly rest; in her, I see the promise of another Nelly! though I hope she’s reserved for a happier fate and is destined to show us what a grown-up female angel is like. I expect great things from Walter, too, who starts off wonderfully and will probably be even better than young Nickleby, to whom he resembles most at this point. I have high hopes for Susan Nipper as well; I think she has great potential, and I hope you don’t plan to drop her. Dombey is quite detestable, and reminds me of a softened Jonas, without his brutal coarseness and ruffian ferocity. I’m still not sure what you plan to make of Paul, but I’ll watch his development with interest. As for Miss Tox, her Major, and the Chicks, I might not care enough. But you know I always wish you didn’t waste your exquisite painting on such characters. I love the Captain and his hook as much as you could hope; and I look forward to the future appearances of Carker Junior, with expectations I know won’t be disappointed. . . ."
[140] "Edinburgh, 31st January, 1847. Oh, my dear, dear Dickens! what a No. 5 you have now given us! I have so cried and sobbed over it last night, and again this morning; and felt my heart purified by those tears, and blessed and loved you for making me shed them; and I never can bless and love you enough. Since the divine Nelly was found dead on her humble couch, beneath the snow and the ivy, there has been nothing like the actual dying of that sweet Paul, in the summer sunshine of that lofty room. And the long vista that leads us so gently and sadly, and yet so gracefully and winningly, to the plain consummation! Every trait so true, and so touching—and yet lightened by the fearless innocence which goes playfully to the brink of the grave, and that pure affection which bears the unstained spirit, on its soft and lambent flash, at once to its source in eternity." . . . In the same letter he told him of his having been reading the Battle of Life again, charmed with its sweet writing and generous sentiments.
[140] "Edinburgh, 31st January, 1847. Oh, my dear, dear Dickens! What an incredible No. 5 you’ve given us! I cried and sobbed over it last night and again this morning; I felt my heart cleanse from those tears, and I adore you for making me shed them; I can never express enough gratitude for that. Since the tragic discovery of dear Nelly, lying lifeless on her modest couch under the snow and ivy, nothing compares to the real passing of that sweet Paul in the summer light of that high room. And the long journey that gracefully and sadly guides us toward the simple ending! Every detail so genuine and moving—and yet brightened by the fearless innocence that playfully approaches the edge of death, along with that pure love that carries the unblemished spirit, on its gentle and shimmering path, back to its source in eternity." . . . In the same letter, he mentioned that he had been rereading the Battle of Life, enchanted by its lovely prose and generous themes.
[141] "Isn't Bunsby good?" I heard Lord Denman call out, with unmistakable glee and enjoyment, over Talfourd's table—I think to Sir Edward Ryan; one of the few survivors of that pleasant dinner party of May 1847.
[141] "Isn't Bunsby great?" I heard Lord Denman exclaim, clearly filled with joy and delight, over Talfourd's table—I think to Sir Edward Ryan; one of the few remaining members of that enjoyable dinner party from May 1847.
[142] He entered the Royal Navy, and survived his father only a year and eleven months. He was a Lieutenant, at the time of his death from a sharp attack of bronchitis; being then on board the P. and O. steamer "Malta," invalided from his ship the Topaze, and on his way home. He was buried at sea on the 2nd of May, 1872. Poor fellow! He was the smallest in size of all the children, in his manhood reaching only to a little over five feet; and throughout his childhood was never called by any other name than the "Ocean Spectre," from a strange little weird yet most attractive look in his large wondering eyes, very happily caught in a sketch in oils by the good Frank Stone, done at Bonchurch in September 1849 and remaining in his aunt's possession. "Stone has painted," Dickens then wrote to me, "the Ocean Spectre, and made a very pretty little picture of him." It was a strange chance that led his father to invent this playful name for one whom the ocean did indeed take to itself at last.
[142] He joined the Royal Navy and lived just a year and eleven months longer than his father. At the time of his death from a severe case of bronchitis, he was a Lieutenant on board the P. and O. steamer "Malta," having been removed from his ship, the Topaze, and was on his way home. He was buried at sea on May 2, 1872. Poor guy! He was the shortest of all the children, reaching just a little over five feet in adulthood, and throughout his childhood, he was known only as the "Ocean Spectre," due to a strangely weird yet appealing look in his large, wondering eyes, which was beautifully captured in an oil painting by the talented Frank Stone in Bonchurch in September 1849, now kept by his aunt. "Stone has painted," Dickens then wrote to me, "the Ocean Spectre, and made a very pretty little picture of him." It was a strange twist of fate that led his father to come up with this playful name for someone whom the ocean eventually claimed.
[143] I think it right to place on record here Leigh Hunt's own allusion to the incident (Autobiography, p. 432), though it will be thought to have too favourable a tone, and I could have wished that other names had also found mention in it. But I have already (p. 211) stated quite unaffectedly my own opinion of the very modest pretensions of the whole affair, and these kind words of Hunt may stand valeant quantum. "Simultaneous with the latest movement about the pension was one on the part of my admirable friend Dickens and other distinguished men, Forsters and Jerrolds, who, combining kindly purpose with an amateur inclination for the stage, had condescended to show to the public what excellent actors they could have been, had they so pleased,—what excellent actors, indeed, some of them were. . . . They proposed . . . a benefit for myself, . . . and the piece performed on the occasion was Ben Jonson's Every Man in his Humour. . . . If anything had been needed to show how men of letters include actors, on the common principle of the greater including the less, these gentlemen would have furnished it. Mr. Dickens's Bobadil had a spirit in it of intellectual apprehension beyond anything the existing stage has shown . . . and Mr. Forster delivered the verses of Ben Jonson with a musical flow and a sense of their grace and beauty unknown, I believe, to the recitation of actors at present. At least I have never heard anything like it since Edmund Kean's." . . . To this may be added some lines from Lord Lytton's prologue spoken at Liverpool, of which I have not been able to find a copy, if indeed it was printed at the time; but the verses come so suddenly and completely back to me, as I am writing after twenty-five years, that in a small way they recall a more interesting effort of memory told me once by Macready. On a Christmas night at Drury Lane there came a necessity to put up the Gamester, which he had not played since he was a youth in his father's theatre thirty years before. He went to rehearsal shrinking from the long and heavy study he should have to undergo, when, with the utterance of the opening sentence, the entire words of the part came back, including even a letter which Beverly has to read, and which it is the property-man's business to supply. My lines come back as unexpectedly; but with pleasanter music than any in Mr. Moore's dreary tragedy, as a few will show.
[143] I think it's important to note Leigh Hunt's reference to the incident (Autobiography, p. 432), even though some might find it too positive, and I wish other names had also been included. However, I have already (p. 211) expressed my honest opinion about the very modest nature of the whole affair, and Hunt's kind words may stand valeant quantum. "At the same time as the latest push for the pension, my wonderful friend Dickens and other notable figures like Forster and Jerrold, who combined good intentions with a casual interest in the theater, decided to showcase how talented actors they could have been if they'd chosen to be—some of them were truly great actors. . . . They organized . . . a benefit for me, . . . and the play performed that night was Ben Jonson's Every Man in his Humour. . . . If there was ever a need to illustrate how literary figures encompass actors on the principle of the greater including the lesser, these gentlemen would have proven it. Mr. Dickens's Bobadil had a level of intellectual depth that surpasses anything currently on stage . . . and Mr. Forster recited the verses of Ben Jonson with a musical quality and an appreciation of their grace and beauty that I believe modern actors lack. At least, I have never heard anything like it since Edmund Kean." . . . Additionally, I recall some lines from Lord Lytton's prologue spoken in Liverpool, which I haven’t been able to find a copy of, if it was even published back then; but the verses have vividly returned to me as I write, even after twenty-five years, and remind me of a more fascinating memory shared by Macready. One Christmas night at Drury Lane, there arose a need to put on the Gamester, a play he hadn't performed since his youth in his father's theater thirty years earlier. He arrived at rehearsal dreading the extensive preparation he had to undertake, but as soon as he spoke the opening line, the entire text of his part returned to him, even including a letter that Beverly has to read, which is supposed to be provided by the property man. My lines come back to me just as unexpectedly, but with a more pleasing sound than any in Mr. Moore's grim tragedy, as a few will illustrate.
Here he comes... our gray-haired poet from Rimini!
Carries the splendor of memories with him,
Emotions and humor, delightful joy and delightful sorrow!
Arrives with a friendly smile and warm tone,
Our wise cheerleader!—Let's celebrate him!
Song connects her children with a golden thread,
To help the living, the bard steps forward from the dead.
Listen to the honest music of the past—
Ben Jonson's heavy footsteps echo across the stage!
Greetings! The big forms our ancestors cherished! Once more
Wellbred's light ease, and Kitely's jealous pain.
Cob should be sensible, and Stephen should be courteous.
Brainworm will preach, and Bobadil will fight—
Here, everyone will find a merit that isn't their own.
And Every Man find the Humour to be kind.
[144] Another, which for many reasons we may regret went also into the limbo of unrealized designs, is sketched in the subjoined (7th of January, 1848). "Mac and I think of going to Ireland for six weeks in the spring, and seeing whether anything is to be done there, in the way of a book? I fancy it might turn out well." The Mac of course is Maclise.
[144] Another idea, which we might regret for various reasons, also faded away into the realm of unfulfilled plans, as mentioned in the note from January 7, 1848. "Mac and I are thinking about heading to Ireland for six weeks in the spring to see if there’s anything we can do there for a book. I have a feeling it could be a good opportunity." The Mac, of course, refers to Maclise.
[145] "Here we are" (23rd of August) "in the noble old premises; and very nice they look, all things considered. . . . Trifles happen to me which occur to nobody else. My portmanteau 'fell off' a cab last night somewhere between London-bridge and here. It contained on a moderate calculation £70 worth of clothes. I have no shirt to put on, and am obliged to send out to a barber to come and shave me."
[145] "Here we are" (August 23) "in the grand old building; and they look quite nice, all things considered. . . . I seem to have odd little mishaps that happen to no one else. My suitcase 'fell off' a cab last night somewhere between London Bridge and here. It had an estimated £70 worth of clothes in it. I have no shirt to wear, and I have to send out for a barber to come and give me a shave."
[146] "Do you see anything to object to in it? I have never had so much difficulty, I think, in setting about any slight thing; for I really didn't know that I had a word to say, and nothing seems to live 'twixt what I have said and silence. The advantage of it is, that the latter part opens an idea for future prefaces all through the series, and may serve perhaps to make a feature of them." (7th of September, 1847.)
[146] "Do you see anything wrong with it? I’ve never had such a hard time starting on something so small; I honestly didn’t think I had anything to say, and it feels like there’s nothing between what I have said and silence. The upside is that the second part brings up an idea for future introductions throughout the series, and it might help make them stand out." (7th of September, 1847.)
[147] From his notes on these matters I may quote. "The Leeds appears to be a very important institution, and I am glad to see that George Stephenson will be there, besides the local lights, inclusive of all the Baineses. They talk at Glasgow of 6,000 people." (26th of November.) "You have got Southey's Holly Tree. I have not. Put it in your pocket to-day. It occurs to me (up to the eyes in a mass of Glasgow Athenæum papers) that I could quote it with good effect in the North." (24th of December.) "A most brilliant demonstration last night, and I think I never did better. Newspaper reports bad." (29th of December.)
[147] From his notes on these topics, I can quote: "Leeds seems to be a really important place, and I'm happy to see that George Stephenson will be there, along with the local talents, including all the Baineses. They’re saying there’ll be 6,000 people in Glasgow." (November 26th.) "You have Southey's Holly Tree. I don’t. Please put it in your pocket today. It occurs to me (buried in a pile of Glasgow Athenæum papers) that I could use it effectively in the North." (December 24th.) "Last night was an amazing performance, and I think I’ve never done better. The newspaper reports are terrible." (December 29th.)
[148] "Tremendous distress at Glasgow, and a truly damnable jail, exhibiting the separate system in a most absurd and hideous form. Governor practical and intelligent; very anxious for the associated silent system; and much comforted by my fault-finding." (30th of December.)
[148] "There’s a lot of suffering in Glasgow, and a truly awful prison showing the separate system in a very ridiculous and ugly way. The governor is practical and smart; really eager about the associated silent system; and he finds comfort in my criticism." (30th of December.)
[149] It would amuse the reader, but occupy too much space, to add to my former illustrations of his managerial troubles; but from an elaborate paper of rules for rehearsals, which I have found in his handwriting, I quote the opening and the close. "Remembering the very imperfect condition of all our plays at present, the general expectation in reference to them, the kind of audience before which they will be presented, and the near approach of the nights of performance, I hope everybody concerned will abide by the following regulations, and will aid in strictly carrying them out." Elaborate are the regulations set forth, but I take only the three last. "Silence, on the stage and in the theatre, to be faithfully observed; the lobbies &c. being always available for conversation. No book to be referred to on the stage; but those who are imperfect to take their words from the prompter. Everyone to act, as nearly as possible, as on the night of performance; everyone to speak out, so as to be audible through the house. And every mistake of exit, entrance, or situation, to be corrected three times successively." He closes thus. "All who were concerned in the first getting up of Every Man in his Humour, and remember how carefully the stage was always kept then, and who have been engaged in the late rehearsals of the Merry Wives, and have experienced the difficulty of getting on, or off: of being heard, or of hearing anybody else: will, I am sure, acknowledge the indispensable necessity of these regulations."
[149] It would entertain the reader, but take up too much space, to add more examples of his management issues; however, from a detailed set of rehearsal rules I've found in his handwriting, I'll quote the beginning and the end. "Considering the very poor condition of all our plays right now, the general expectations regarding them, the type of audience we’ll be performing for, and the upcoming performance nights, I hope everyone involved will follow these rules and help ensure they are properly enforced." The rules laid out are detailed, but I'll only mention the last three. "Silence, both on stage and in the theater, must be strictly maintained; the lobbies, etc., are always open for conversation. No scripts should be used on stage; those who are unprepared should get their lines from the prompter. Everyone should behave as closely as possible to how they would on performance night; everyone should speak clearly so they can be heard throughout the venue. And every error in entering, exiting, or positioning must be corrected three times in a row." He concludes with, "All who were involved in the original production of Every Man in his Humour, and remember how carefully the stage was maintained then, and those who have participated in the recent rehearsals of the Merry Wives, and have recognized the challenges of entering or exiting, or of being heard, or hearing others: will, I’m sure, understand the critical importance of these rules."
[150] I give the sums taken at the several theatres. Haymarket, £319 14s.; Manchester, £266 12s. 6d.; Liverpool, £467 6s. 6d.; Birmingham, £327 10s., and £262 18s. 6d.; Edinburgh, £325 1s. 6d.; Glasgow, £471 7s. 8d., and (at half the prices of the first night) £210 10s.
[150] Here are the totals from the various theaters: Haymarket, £319.14; Manchester, £266.12.6; Liverpool, £467.6.6; Birmingham, £327.10; and £262.18.6; Edinburgh, £325.1.6; Glasgow, £471.7.8; and (at half the prices of the opening night) £210.10.
[151] "Those Rabbits have more nature in them than you commonly find in Rabbits"—the self-commendatory remark of an aspiring animal-painter showing his piece to the most distinguished master in that line—was here in my friend's mind.
[151] "Those rabbits have more character than you usually see in rabbits"—the self-praising comment of an ambitious animal painter presenting his work to the top master in the field—was on my friend's mind.
[152] Mr. Tonson was a small part in the comedy entrusted with much appropriateness to Mr. Charles Knight, whose Autobiography has this allusion to the first performance, which, as Mr. Pepys says, is "pretty to observe." "The actors and the audience were so close together that as Mr. Jacob Tonson sat in Wills's Coffee-house he could have touched with his clouded cane the Duke of Wellington." (iii. 116.)
[152] Mr. Tonson had a small role in the comedy that was very fitting for Mr. Charles Knight, who mentions in his Autobiography the first performance, which, as Mr. Pepys noted, is "interesting to observe." "The actors and the audience were so close together that while Mr. Jacob Tonson was sitting in Wills's Coffee-house, he could have touched the Duke of Wellington with his clouded cane." (iii. 116.)
[153] My friend Mr. Shirley Brooks sends me a "characteristic" cutting from an autograph catalogue in which these few lines are given from an early letter in the Doughty-street days. "I always pay my taxes when they won't call any longer, in order to get a bad name in the parish and so escape all honours." It is a touch of character, certainly; but though his motive in later life was the same, his method was not. He attended to the tax-collector, but of any other parochial or political application took no notice whatever.
[153] My friend Mr. Shirley Brooks sent me a "characteristic" excerpt from an autograph catalog that includes these lines from an early letter during the Doughty Street days. "I always pay my taxes when they stop calling, just to get a bad reputation in the neighborhood and avoid any honors." It's definitely a glimpse of his character; however, while his motive later in life remained the same, his approach changed. He dealt with the tax collector, but he completely ignored any other local or political requests.
[154] Even in the modest retirement of a note I fear that I shall offend the dignity of history, and of biography, by printing the lines in which this intention was announced to me. They were written "in character;" and the character was that of the "waterman" at the Charing-cross cabstand, first discovered by George Cattermole, whose imitations of him were a delight to Dickens at this time, and adapted themselves in the exuberance of his admiration to every conceivable variety of subject. The painter of the Derby Day will have a fullness of satisfaction in remembering this. "Sloppy" the hero in question, had a friend "Jack" in whom he was supposed to typify his own early and hard experiences before he became a convert to temperance; and Dickens used to point to "Jack" as the justification of himself and Mrs. Gamp for their portentous invention of Mrs. Harris. It is amazing nonsense to repeat; but to hear Cattermole, in the gruff hoarse accents of what seemed to be the remains of a deep bass voice wrapped up in wet straw, repeat the wild proceedings of Jack, was not to be forgotten. "Yes sir, Jack went mad sir, just afore he 'stablished hisself by Sir Robert Peel's-s-s, sir. He was allis a callin' for a pint o' beer sir, and they brings him water sir. Yes sir. And so sir, I sees him dodgin' about one day sir, yes sir, and at last he gits a hopportunity sir and claps a pitch-plaster on the mouth o' th' pump sir, and says he's done for his wust henemy sir. Yes sir. And then they finds him a-sittin' on the top o' the corn-chest sir, yes sir, a crammin' a old pistol with wisps o' hay and horse-beans sir, and swearin' he's a goin' to blow hisself to hattoms, yes sir, but he doesn't, no sir. For I sees him arterwards a lyin' on the straw a manifacktrin' Bengal cheroots out o' corn-chaff sir and swearin' he'd make 'em smoke sir, but they hulloxed him off round by the corner of Drummins's-s-s-s-s-s sir, just afore I come here sir, yes sir. And so you never see'd us together sir, no sir." This was the remarkable dialect in which Dickens wrote from Broadstairs on the 13th of July. "About Saturday sir?—Why sir, I'm a-going to Folkestone a Saturday sir!—not on accounts of the manifacktring of Bengal cheroots as there is there but for the survayin' o' the coast sir. 'Cos you see sir, bein' here sir, and not a finishin' my work sir till to-morrow sir, I couldn't go afore! And if I wos to come home, and not go, and come back agin sir, wy it would be nat'rally a hulloxing of myself sir. Yes sir. Wy sir, I b'lieve that the gent as is a goin' to 'stablish hisself sir, in the autumn, along with me round the corner sir (by Drummins's-s-s-s-s-s bank) is a comin' down to Folkestone Saturday arternoon—Leech by name sir—yes sir—another Jack sir—and if you wos to come down along with him sir by the train as gits to Folkestone twenty minutes arter five, you'd find me a smoking a Bengal cheroot (made of clover-chaff and horse-beans sir) on the platform. You couldn't spend your arternoon better sir. Dover, Sandgate, Herne Bay—they're all to be wisited sir, most probable, till such times as a 'ouse is found sir. Yes sir. Then decide to come sir, and say you will, and do it. I shall be here till arter post time Saturday mornin' sir. Come on then!
[154] Even in the simple act of writing a note, I worry that I might disrespect the seriousness of history and biography by sharing the words where this intention was revealed to me. They were written "in character;" and the character was that of the "waterman" at the Charing-cross cabstand, first discovered by George Cattermole, whose portrayals of him amused Dickens at that time, adapting his style to every imaginable topic. The artist of the Derby Day will find it satisfying to recall this. "Sloppy," the hero in question, had a friend named "Jack" who was supposed to represent his own tough early experiences before he converted to temperance; and Dickens used to cite "Jack" as the validation for himself and Mrs. Gamp regarding their bizarre creation of Mrs. Harris. It sounds absurd to repeat, but it was unforgettable to hear Cattermole, in the rough, raspy voice that seemed to echo a deep bass wrapped in wet straw, recount Jack's wild antics. "Yes sir, Jack went mad sir, just before he 'established himself by Sir Robert Peel's-s-s, sir. He was always calling for a pint of beer sir, and they brought him water sir. Yes sir. And so sir, I saw him dodging about one day sir, yes sir, and finally he gets a chance sir and puts a pitch-plaster on the mouth of the pump sir, and says he's done for his worst enemy sir. Yes sir. And then they find him sitting on the top of the corn-chest sir, yes sir, cramming an old pistol with bits of hay and horse-beans sir, and swearing he's going to blow himself to bits, yes sir, but he doesn't, no sir. For I see him later lying on the straw making Bengal cheroots out of corn-chaff sir and swearing he'd get them to smoke sir, but they dragged him off around the corner of Drummins's-s-s-s-s-s sir, just before I came here sir, yes sir. And so you never saw us together sir, no sir." This was the notable dialect in which Dickens wrote from Broadstairs on July 13th. "About Saturday sir?—Why sir, I'm going to Folkestone on Saturday sir!—not because of the making of Bengal cheroots over there but for surveying the coast sir. You see sir, being here sir, and not finishing my work sir until tomorrow sir, I couldn’t leave any earlier! And if I were to come home, not go, and then come back again sir, well it would just be a mess for me sir. Yes sir. Well sir, I believe the gentleman who's going to set himself up sir, in the autumn, with me around the corner sir (by Drummins's-s-s-s-s-s bank) is coming down to Folkestone Saturday afternoon—Leech by name sir—yes sir—another Jack sir—and if you were to come down with him sir by the train that gets to Folkestone twenty minutes after five, you'd find me smoking a Bengal cheroot (made of clover-chaff and horse-beans sir) on the platform. You couldn't spend your afternoon better sir. Dover, Sandgate, Herne Bay—they're all likely to be visited sir, until a house is found sir. Yes sir. So decide to come sir, and say you will, and do it. I shall be here until after post time Saturday morning sir. Come on then!
"His x mark."
[155] It stood originally thus: "'Do you recollect the date,' said Mr. Dick, looking earnestly at me, and taking up his pen to note it down, 'when that bull got into the china warehouse and did so much mischief?' I was very much surprised by the inquiry; but remembering a song about such an occurrence that was once popular at Salem House, and thinking he might want to quote it, replied that I believed it was on St. Patrick's Day. 'Yes, I know,' said Mr. Dick—'in the morning; but what year?' I could give no information on this point." Original MS. of Copperfield.
[155] It originally went like this: "'Do you remember the date,' Mr. Dick asked, looking at me seriously and picking up his pen to write it down, 'when that bull got into the china warehouse and caused so much trouble?' I was really surprised by the question; but recalling a song about that incident that used to be popular at Salem House, and thinking he might want to quote it, I said I thought it was on St. Patrick's Day. 'Yes, I know,' Mr. Dick said—'in the morning; but what year?' I couldn’t provide any information on that." Original MS. of Copperfield.
[156] The mention of this name may remind me to state that I have received, in reference to the account in my first volume of Dickens's repurchase of his Sketches from Mr. Macrone, a letter from the solicitor and friend of that gentleman so expressed that I could have greatly wished to revise my narrative into nearer agreement with its writer's wish. But farther enquiry, and an examination of the books of Messrs. Chapman and Hall, have confirmed the statement given. Mr. Hansard is in error in supposing that "unsold impressions" of the books were included in the transaction (the necessary requirement being simply that the small remainders on hand should be transferred with a view to being "wasted"): I know myself that it could not have included any supposed right of Mr. Macrone to have a novel written for him, because upon that whole matter, and his continued unauthorised advertisements of the tale, I decided myself the reference against him: and Mr. Hansard may be assured that the £2000 was paid for the copyright alone. For the same copyright, a year before, Dickens had received £250, both the first and second series being included in the payment; and he had already had about the same sum as his half share of the profits of sales. I quote the close of Mr. Hansard's letter. "Macrone no doubt was an adventurer, but he was sanguine to the highest degree. He was a dreamer of dreams, putting no restraint on his exultant hopes by the reflection that he was not dealing justly towards others. But reproach has fallen upon him from wrong quarters. He died in poverty, and his creditors received nothing from his estate. But that was because he had paid away all he had, and all he had derived from trust and credit, to authors." This may have been so, but Dickens was not among the authors so benefited. The Sketches repurchased for the high price I have named never afterwards really justified such an outlay.
[156] The mention of this name reminds me to state that I received a letter from the lawyer and friend of Mr. Macrone about the account in my first volume regarding Dickens's repurchase of his Sketches. The letter was expressed in a way that made me wish I could revise my narrative to align more closely with the writer's view. However, further inquiry and a look at the records from Messrs. Chapman and Hall have confirmed the information I provided. Mr. Hansard is mistaken in thinking that "unsold impressions" of the books were part of the deal; the requirement was simply that the remaining copies on hand should be transferred to be "wasted." I know it couldn’t have included any supposed right of Mr. Macrone to have a novel written for him, as I personally handled the issue regarding his unauthorized advertisements for the tale, and Mr. Hansard can be assured that the £2000 was paid solely for the copyright. A year earlier, Dickens received £250 for the same copyright, which covered both the first and second series, and he had already earned roughly the same amount as his half share of the sales profits. I quote the conclusion of Mr. Hansard's letter: "Macrone was undoubtedly an adventurer, but he was incredibly optimistic. He dreamed big, without restraining his hopes by considering how he affected others. However, he faced criticism from unfair sources. He died in poverty, and his creditors got nothing from his estate. But that was because he had given away everything he had, including what he gained through trust and credit, to authors." This may have been true, but Dickens was not among the authors who benefited. The Sketches repurchased for the high price I mentioned never really justified such an expense.
[157] Mr. Sala's first paper appeared in September 1851, and in the same month of the following year I had an allusion in a letter from Dickens which I shall hope to have Mr. Sala's forgiveness for printing. "That was very good indeed of Sala's" (some essay he had written). "He was twenty guineas in advance, by the bye, and I told Wills delicately to make him a present of it. I find him a very conscientious fellow. When he gets money ahead, he is not like the imbecile youth who so often do the like in Wellington-street" (the office of Household Words) "and walk off, but only works more industriously. I think he improves with everything he does. He looks sharply at the alterations in his articles, I observe; and takes the hint next time."
[157] Mr. Sala's first paper came out in September 1851, and in the same month the following year, I received a letter from Dickens that mentioned him, which I hope Mr. Sala will forgive me for sharing. "That was really impressive of Sala" (referring to some essay he had written). "He was ahead by twenty guineas, by the way, and I told Wills, in a subtle way, to give him a gift of it. I find him to be a very dedicated guy. When he has some money saved up, he doesn't behave like the foolish young men who often do the same in Wellington Street" (the office of Household Words) "and just walk away; instead, he works even harder. I think he gets better with everything he does. I've noticed that he pays close attention to the changes made in his articles and takes notes for next time."
[158] I take the opportunity of saying that there was an omission of three words in the epitaph quoted on a former page (vol. i. p. 120). The headstone at the grave in Kensal-green bears this inscription: "Young, beautiful, and good, God in His mercy numbered her among His angels at the early age of seventeen."
[159] From letters of nearly the same date here is another characteristic word: "Pen and ink before me! Am I not at work on Copperfield! Nothing else would have kept me here until half-past two on such a day. . . . Indian news bad indeed. Sad things come of bloody war. If it were not for Elihu, I should be a peace and arbitration man."
[159] From letters around the same time, here’s another telling remark: "Pen and ink in front of me! Am I not working on Copperfield! Nothing else would have had me here until half-past two on a day like this. . . . The news from India is really bad. Tragic outcomes come from bloody wars. If it weren't for Elihu, I would be all for peace and arbitration."
[160] Here is really an only average specimen of the letters as published: "I forgot to say, if you leave your chamber twenty times a day, after using your basin, you would find it clean, and the pitcher replenished on your return, and that you cannot take your clothes off, but they are taken away, brushed, folded, pressed, and placed in the bureau; and at the dressing-hour, before dinner, you find your candles lighted, your clothes laid out, your shoes cleaned, and everything arranged for use; . . . the dress-clothes brushed and folded in the nicest manner, and cold water, and hot water, and clean napkins in the greatest abundance. . . . Imagine an elegant chamber, fresh water in basins, in goblets, in tubs, and sheets of the finest linen!"
[160] Here’s a pretty average example of the letters as published: "I forgot to mention, if you step out of your room twenty times a day after using your basin, you’d find it clean and the pitcher full when you come back. And as for your clothes, you don’t even have to take them off—someone takes them away, brushes them, folds them, presses them, and puts them in the dresser. Then, at dressing time before dinner, you find your candles lit, your clothes laid out, your shoes polished, and everything ready for you; . . . the formal clothes brushed and folded perfectly, and there’s an abundance of both cold and hot water, along with fresh napkins. . . . Picture an elegant room, fresh water in basins, goblets, tubs, and sheets made of the finest linen!"
[162] It may be proper to record the fact that he had made a short run to Paris, with Maclise, at the end of June, of which sufficient farther note will have been taken if I print the subjoined passages from a letter to me dated 24th June, 1850, Hôtel Windsor, Rue de Rivoli. "There being no room in the Hôtel Brighton, we are lodged (in a very good apartment) here. The heat is absolutely frightful. I never felt anything like it in Italy. Sleep is next to impossible, except in the day, when the room is dark, and the patient exhausted. We purpose leaving here on Saturday morning and going to Rouen, whence we shall proceed either to Havre or Dieppe, and so arrange our proceedings as to be home, please God, on Tuesday evening. We are going to some of the little theatres to-night, and on Wednesday to the Français, for Rachel's last performance before she goes to London. There does not seem to be anything remarkable in progress, in the theatrical way. Nor do I observe that out of doors the place is much changed, except in respect of the carriages which are certainly less numerous. I also think the Sunday is even much more a day of business than it used to be. As we are going into the country with Regnier to-morrow, I write this after letter-time and before going out to dine at the Trois Frères, that it may come to you by to-morrow's post. The twelve hours' journey here is astounding—marvellously done, except in respect of the means of refreshment, which are absolutely none. Mac is very well (extremely loose as to his waistcoat, and otherwise careless in regard of buttons) and sends his love. De Fresne proposes a dinner with all the notabilities of Paris present, but I won't stand it! I really have undergone so much fatigue from work, that I am resolved not even to see him, but to please myself. I find, my child (as Horace Walpole would say), that I have written you nothing here, but you will take the will for the deed."
[162] I should mention that he took a quick trip to Paris with Maclise at the end of June. More details will be noted if I print the following excerpts from a letter I received on June 24, 1850, from Hôtel Windsor, Rue de Rivoli. "Since there was no room at the Hôtel Brighton, we've ended up here (in a very nice apartment). The heat is absolutely unbearable. I've never experienced anything like it in Italy. Sleeping is nearly impossible, except during the day when the room is dark, and the patient is exhausted. We're planning to leave here on Saturday morning and head to Rouen, from where we'll either go to Havre or Dieppe, arranging our trip so we can be home, God willing, by Tuesday evening. We’re going to some small theaters tonight, and on Wednesday we’ll attend the Français for Rachel’s final performance before she heads to London. There doesn’t seem to be anything noteworthy happening in the theater scene. I also notice that outside, the city hasn’t changed much, except there are definitely fewer carriages. I think Sundays are now even more busy than they used to be. Since we’re heading out to the countryside with Regnier tomorrow, I’m writing this after letter time and before going out to dinner at the Trois Frères, so it can reach you by tomorrow's post. The twelve-hour journey here is incredible—very well done, except for the lack of refreshment options, which are nonexistent. Mac is doing well (his waistcoat is extremely loose, and he's otherwise careless about his buttons) and sends his love. De Fresne wants to have dinner with all the notable people in Paris present, but I won’t do it! I’ve been so worn out from work that I’ve decided not to see him, just to do what I want. I realize, my child (as Horace Walpole would say), that I haven’t written much here, but you’ll appreciate the intent."
[163] The rest of the letter may be allowed to fill the corner of a note. The allusions to Rogers and Landor are by way of reply to an invitation I had sent him. "I am extremely sorry to hear about Fox. Shall call to enquire, as I come by to the Temple. And will call on you (taking the chance of finding you) on my way to that Seat of Boredom. I wrote my paper for H. W. yesterday, and have begun Copperfield this morning. Still undecided about Dora, but must decide to-day. La difficulté d'écrire l'Anglais m'est extrêmement ennuyeuse. Ah, mon Dieu! si l'on pourrait toujours écrire cette belle langue de France! Monsieur Rogere! Ah! qu'il est homme d'esprit, homme de génie, homme des lettres! Monsieur Landore! Ah qu'il parle Français—pas parfaitement comme un ange—un peu (peut-être) comme un diable! Mais il est bon garçon—sérieusement, il est un de la vraie noblesse de la nature. Votre tout dévoué, Charles. À Monsieur Monsieur Fos-tere."
[163] The rest of the letter can fill the corner of a note. The references to Rogers and Landor are in response to an invitation I had sent him. "I’m really sorry to hear about Fox. I’ll stop by to check in as I pass by the Temple. I’ll also drop by to see you (hoping to find you there) on my way to that boring place. I wrote my paper for H. W. yesterday and started Copperfield this morning. I’m still undecided about Dora, but I have to make a choice today. Writing in English is really annoying for me. Oh, my God! If only we could always write in that beautiful French language! Mr. Rogers! Oh! what a clever man, a genius, a man of letters! Mr. Landor! Oh, he speaks French—not perfectly like an angel—maybe a bit (perhaps) like a devil! But he’s a good guy—seriously, he is one of the true nobles of nature. Yours devotedly, Charles. To Mr. Fos-tere."
[165] Here are two passages taken from Hunt's writing in the Tatler (a charming little paper which it was one of the first ventures of the young firm of Chapman and Hall to attempt to establish for Hunt in 1830), to which accident had unluckily attracted Dickens's notice:—"Supposing us to be in want of patronage, and in possession of talent enough to make it an honour to notice us, we would much rather have some great and comparatively private friend, rich enough to assist us, and amiable enough to render obligation delightful, than become the public property of any man, or of any government. . . . If a divinity had given us our choice we should have said—make us La Fontaine, who goes and lives twenty years with some rich friend, as innocent of any harm in it as a child, and who writes what he thinks charming verses, sitting all day under a tree." Such sayings will not bear to be deliberately read and thought over, but any kind of extravagance or oddity came from Hunt's lips with a curious fascination. There was surely never a man of so sunny a nature, who could draw so much pleasure from common things, or to whom books were a world so real, so exhaustless, so delightful. I was only seventeen when I derived from him the tastes which have been the solace of all subsequent years, and I well remember the last time I saw him at Hammersmith, not long before his death in 1859, when, with his delicate, worn, but keenly intellectual face, his large luminous eyes, his thick shock of wiry grey hair, and a little cape of faded black silk over his shoulders, he looked like an old French abbé. He was buoyant and pleasant as ever; and was busy upon a vindication of Chaucer and Spenser from Cardinal Wiseman, who had attacked them for alleged sensuous and voluptuous qualities.
[165] Here are two passages from Hunt's writing in the Tatler (a charming little publication that was one of the first projects the young firm of Chapman and Hall attempted to establish for Hunt in 1830), which by chance caught Dickens's attention:—"If we needed support and had enough talent to make it worthwhile to notice us, we would much prefer having a great, relatively private friend who's rich enough to help us and kind enough to make us feel good about being indebted, rather than becoming the property of any man or government. . . . If a deity had given us a choice, we would have said—make us La Fontaine, who spends twenty years living with some wealthy friend, as innocent as a child, writing charming verses while sitting under a tree all day." Such remarks aren't meant for serious reading and contemplation, but any kind of eccentricity or quirkiness coming from Hunt had a captivating charm. There has never been a person with such a sunny disposition who could find so much joy in ordinary things, or for whom books were such a real, endless, and delightful world. I was only seventeen when I gained from him the tastes that have comforted me throughout the years, and I clearly remember the last time I saw him at Hammersmith, shortly before his death in 1859, when, with his delicate, worn, yet sharply intelligent face, his large bright eyes, thick mass of wiry gray hair, and a little faded black silk cape draped over his shoulders, he resembled an old French abbé. He was as cheerful and pleasant as ever, busy working on a defense of Chaucer and Spenser against Cardinal Wiseman, who had criticized them for supposed sensual and lavish qualities.
[167] "O! Here's the boy, gentlemen! Here he is, very muddy, very hoarse, very ragged. Now, boy!—But stop a minute. Caution. This boy must be put through a few preliminary paces. Name, Jo. Nothing else that he knows on. Don't know that everybody has two names. Never heerd of sich a think. Don't know that Jo is short for a longer name. Thinks it long enough for him. He don't find no fault with it. Spell it? No. He can't spell it. No father, no mother, no friends. Never been to school. What's home? Knows a broom's a broom, and knows it's wicked to tell a lie. Don't recollect who told him about the broom, or about the lie, but knows both. Can't exactly say what'll be done to him arter he's dead if he tells a lie to the gentleman here, but believes it'll be something wery bad to punish him, and serve him right—and so he'll tell the truth. 'This won't do, gentlemen,' says the coroner, with a melancholy shake of the head. . . . 'Can't exactly say won't do, you know. . . . It's terrible depravity. Put the boy aside.' Boy put aside; to the great edification of the audience;—especially of Little Swills, the Comic Vocalist."
[167] "Oh! Here’s the boy, everyone! Here he is, very dirty, very hoarse, very ragged. Now, boy!—But hold on a minute. Caution. This boy needs to go through a few basic checks. What’s your name? Jo. That’s all he knows. He doesn’t think everyone has two names. Never heard of such a thing. He doesn’t know Jo is short for something longer. He thinks it’s long enough for him. He doesn’t have any complaints about it. Can you spell it? No. He can’t spell it. No father, no mother, no friends. He’s never been to school. What’s home? He knows a broom’s a broom and that it’s wrong to lie. He doesn’t remember who taught him about the broom or about lying, but he knows both. Can’t say exactly what will happen to him after he’s dead if he lies to the gentleman here, but he thinks it’ll be something really bad as punishment, and he deserves it—so he’ll tell the truth. 'This won’t work, gentlemen,' says the coroner with a sad shake of his head. . . . 'Can’t exactly say it won’t work, you know. . . . It’s terrible depravity. Put the boy aside.' The boy was set aside, much to the great enjoyment of the audience;—especially of Little Swills, the Comic Vocalist."
[168] By W. Challinor Esq. of Leek in Staffordshire, by whom it has been obligingly sent to me, with a copy of Dickens's letter acknowledging the receipt of it from the author on the 11th of March 1852. On the first of that month the first number of Bleak House had appeared, but two numbers of it were then already written.
[168] By W. Challinor Esq. from Leek in Staffordshire, who kindly sent it to me along with a copy of Dickens's letter confirming he received it from the author on March 11, 1852. By the first of that month, the first issue of Bleak House had already been published, but two issues of it had been written by then.
[169] I subjoin the dozen titles successively proposed for Bleak House. 1. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Ruined House;" 2. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Solitary House that was always shut up;" 3. "Bleak House Academy;" 4. "The East Wind;" 5. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Ruined [House, Building, Factory, Mill] that got into Chancery and never got out;" 6. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Solitary House where the Grass grew;" 7. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Solitary House that was always shut up and never Lighted;" 8. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Ruined Mill, that got into Chancery and never got out;" 9. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Solitary House where the Wind howled;" 10. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Ruined House that got into Chancery and never got out;" 11. "Bleak House and the East Wind. How they both got into Chancery and never got out;" 12. "Bleak House."
[169] Here are the twelve titles that were proposed one after another for Bleak House. 1. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Ruined House;" 2. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Solitary House that was always closed;" 3. "Bleak House Academy;" 4. "The East Wind;" 5. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Ruined [House, Building, Factory, Mill] that got caught up in Chancery and never got out;" 6. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Solitary House where the Grass grew;" 7. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Solitary House that was always closed and never lit;" 8. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Ruined Mill that got caught up in Chancery and never got out;" 9. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Solitary House where the Wind howled;" 10. "Tom-all-Alone's. The Ruined House that got caught up in Chancery and never got out;" 11. "Bleak House and the East Wind. How they both got caught up in Chancery and never got out;" 12. "Bleak House."
[170] He was greatly interested in the movement for closing town and city graves (see the close of the 11th chapter of Bleak House), and providing places of burial under State supervision.
[170] He was very interested in the movement to close town and city cemeteries (see the end of the 11th chapter of Bleak House), and to establish burial sites under state supervision.
[171] The promise was formally conveyed next morning in a letter to one who took the lead then and since in all good work for Birmingham, Mr. Arthur Ryland. The reading would, he said in this letter (7th of Jan. 1853), "take about two hours, with a pause of ten minutes half way through. There would be some novelty in the thing, as I have never done it in public, though I have in private, and (if I may say so) with a great effect on the hearers."
[171] The promise was officially communicated the next morning in a letter to Mr. Arthur Ryland, who has been at the forefront of all positive efforts for Birmingham. In this letter dated January 7, 1853, he mentioned that the reading would "take about two hours, with a ten-minute break halfway through. There would be something new about it since I have never done it in public, although I've done it privately, and (if I may say) it had a significant impact on those who listened."
[172] Baron Tauchnitz, describing to me his long and uninterrupted friendly intercourse with Dickens, has this remark: "I give also a passage from one of his letters written at the time when he sent his son Charles, through my mediation, to Leipzig. He says in it what he desires for his son. 'I want him to have all interest in, and to acquire a knowledge of, the life around him, and to be treated like a gentleman though pampered in nothing. By punctuality in all things, great or small, I set great store.'"
[172] Baron Tauchnitz, sharing with me about his long and constant friendship with Dickens, made this comment: "I'm also sharing a part of one of his letters from the time he sent his son Charles to Leipzig with my help. In it, he expresses his wishes for his son. 'I want him to be interested in and to learn about the life around him, and to be treated like a gentleman without being spoiled. I place great importance on punctuality in everything, big or small.'"
[173] From one of his letters while there I take a passage of observation full of character. "Great excitement here about a wretched woman who has murdered her child. Apropos of which I observed a curious thing last night. The newspaper offices (local journals) had placards like this outside:
[173] From one of his letters while there, I want to share an interesting observation. "There's a huge buzz here about a terrible woman who killed her child. Speaking of which, I noticed something odd last night. The newspaper offices (local papers) had signs outside that said:
INQUEST.
COMMITTAL OF THE MURDERESS.
[175] "After correspondence with all parts of England, and every kind of refusal and evasion on my part, I am now obliged to decide this question—whether I shall read two nights at Bradford for a hundred pounds. If I do, I may take as many hundred pounds as I choose." 27th of Jan. 1854.
[175] "After communicating with everyone across England, and dealing with all sorts of refusals and evasions on my end, I now have to make a decision on this matter—whether I should perform for two nights in Bradford for a hundred pounds. If I agree to do it, I can take as many hundred pounds as I want." 27th of Jan. 1854.
[176] On the 28th of Dec. 1854 he wrote from Bradford: "The hall is enormous, and they expect to seat 3700 people to-night! Notwithstanding which, it seems to me a tolerably easy place—except that the width of the platform is so very great to the eye at first." From Folkestone, on his way to Paris, he wrote in the autumn of 1855: "16th of Sept. I am going to read for them here, on the 5th of next month, and have answered in the last fortnight thirty applications to do the like all over England, Ireland, and Scotland. Fancy my having to come from Paris in December, to do this, at Peterborough, Birmingham, and Sheffield—old promises." Again: 23rd of Sept. "I am going to read here, next Friday week. There are (as there are everywhere) a Literary Institution and a Working Men's Institution, which have not the slightest sympathy or connexion. The stalls are five shillings, but I have made them fix the working men's admission at threepence, and I hope it may bring them together. The event comes off in a carpenter's shop, as the biggest place that can be got." In 1857, at Paxton's request, he read his Carol at Coventry for the Institute.
[176] On December 28, 1854, he wrote from Bradford: "The hall is massive, and they're expecting to seat 3,700 people tonight! Even so, it seems like a fairly easy place—except the width of the platform looks quite large at first." From Folkestone, on his way to Paris, he wrote in the fall of 1855: "September 16. I'm going to read for them here on the 5th of next month, and in the last two weeks, I've answered thirty requests to do similar events all over England, Ireland, and Scotland. Can you imagine I have to come from Paris in December to do this in Peterborough, Birmingham, and Sheffield—old commitments." Again: September 23. "I’m going to read here next Friday week. There are (as there always are) a Literary Institution and a Working Men's Institution, with no connection or sympathy between them. The stalls are five shillings, but I've arranged for the working men's admission to be threepence, and I hope that might bring them together. The event will take place in a carpenter's shop, as it's the biggest venue available." In 1857, at Paxton's request, he read his Carol at Coventry for the Institute.
Small my size,
Small my size,
My name it is Tom Thumb,
Small for my size.
Yet though I am so small,
I have killed the giants tall;
And now I'm paid for all,
Small my size,
Small like my size,
And now I'm paid for all,
Small my size.
[178] This finds mention, I observe, in a pleasant description of "Mr. Dickens's Amateur Theatricals," which appeared in Macmillan's Magazine two years ago, by one who had been a member of the Juvenile Company. I quote a passage, recommending the whole paper as very agreeably written, with some shrewd criticism. "Mr. Planché had in one portion of the extravaganza put into the mouth of one of the characters for the moment a few lines of burlesque upon Macbeth, and we remember Mr. Dickens's unsuccessful attempts to teach the performer how to imitate Macready, whom he (the performer) had never seen! And after the performance, when we were restored to our evening-party costumes, and the school-room was cleared for dancing, still a stray 'property' or two had escaped the vigilant eye of the property-man, for Douglas Jerrold had picked up the horse's head (Fortunio's faithful steed Comrade), and was holding it up before the greatest living animal painter, who had been one of the audience, with 'Looks as if it knew you, Edwin!'"
[178] I see this mentioned in an enjoyable piece about "Mr. Dickens's Amateur Theatricals," which was published in Macmillan's Magazine two years ago, written by someone who was part of the Juvenile Company. I'll share a part that highlights the entire article as well-written and insightful. "In one part of the extravagant performance, Mr. Planché had one of the characters deliver a few lines parodying Macbeth, and we recall Mr. Dickens's attempts to teach the actor how to imitate Macready, even though the actor had never seen him! After the show, when we changed back into our party outfits and the classroom was cleared for dancing, there were still a couple of stray 'props' that had evaded the watchful eye of the property manager. Douglas Jerrold had picked up the horse's head (Fortunio's loyal steed Comrade) and was holding it up in front of the greatest living animal painter, who had been in the audience, saying, 'Looks as if it knows you, Edwin!'"
[179] He went with the rest to Boulogne in the summer, and an anecdote transmitted in one of his father's letters will show that he maintained the reputation as a comedian which his early debut had awakened. "Original Anecdote of the Plornishghenter. This distinguished wit, being at Boulogne with his family, made a close acquaintance with his landlord, whose name was M. Beaucourt—the only French word with which he was at that time acquainted. It happened that one day he was left unusually long in a bathing-machine when the tide was making, accompanied by his two young brothers and little English nurse, without being drawn to land. The little nurse, being frightened, cried 'M'soo! M'soo!' The two young brothers being frightened, cried 'Ici! Ici!'. Our wit, at once perceiving that his English was of no use to him under the foreign circumstances, immediately fell to bawling 'Beau-court!' which he continued to shout at the utmost pitch of his voice and with great gravity, until rescued.—New Boulogne Jest Book, page 578."
[179] He went with everyone else to Boulogne in the summer, and an amusing story from one of his father's letters shows that he kept up the reputation as a comedian that he had started with his early performance. "Original Anecdote of the Plornishghenter. This clever guy, being in Boulogne with his family, became good friends with his landlord, whose name was M. Beaucourt—the only French word he knew at that time. One day, he was left in a bathing machine for a surprisingly long time while the tide was coming in, along with his two young brothers and little English nurse, without being pulled back to shore. The little nurse, scared, shouted 'M'soo! M'soo!' The two young brothers, also frightened, yelled 'Ici! Ici!'. Our comedian, realizing that his English was useless in that situation, started shouting 'Beau-court!' at the top of his lungs and with serious expression, until someone came to save them.—New Boulogne Jest Book, page 578."
[180] To show the pains he took in such matters I will give other titles also thought of for this tale. 1. Fact; 2. Hard-headed Gradgrind; 3. Hard Heads and Soft Hearts; 4. Heads and Tales; 5. Black and White.
[180] To illustrate the effort he put into these things, I will share other titles that were considered for this story. 1. Fact; 2. Hard-headed Gradgrind; 3. Hard Heads and Soft Hearts; 4. Heads and Tales; 5. Black and White.
[181] It is well to remember, too, what he wrote about the story to Charles Knight. It had no design, he said, to damage the really useful truths of Political Economy, but was wholly directed against "those who see figures and averages, and nothing else; who would take the average of cold in the Crimea during twelve months as a reason for clothing a soldier in nankeen on a night when he would be frozen to death in fur; and who would comfort the labourer in travelling twelve miles a day to and from his work, by telling him that the average distance of one inhabited place from another, on the whole area of England, is not more than four miles."
[181] It's important to remember what he wrote to Charles Knight about the story. He said it wasn't meant to undermine the valuable truths of Political Economy, but was completely aimed at "those who only see numbers and averages, and nothing else; who would use the average temperature in the Crimea over twelve months as a reason to dress a soldier in light fabric on a night when he'd freeze to death in real winter gear; and who would reassure the worker making a twelve-mile round trip to his job by telling him that the average distance between populated areas in all of England is only four miles."
[182] It is curious that with as strong a view in the opposite direction, and with an equally mistaken exaltation, above the writer's ordinary level, of a book which on the whole was undoubtedly below it, Mr. Taine speaks of Hard Times as that one of Dickens's romances which is a summary of all the rest: exalting instinct above reason, and the intuitions of the heart above practical knowledge; attacking all education based on statistic figures and facts; heaping sorrow and ridicule on the practical mercantile people; fighting against the pride, hardness, and selfishness of the merchant and noble; cursing the manufacturing towns for imprisoning bodies in smoke and mud, and souls in falsehood and factitiousness;—while it contrasts, with that satire of social oppression, lofty eulogy of the oppressed; and searches out poor workmen, jugglers, foundlings, and circus people, for types of good sense, sweetness of disposition, generosity, delicacy, and courage, to perpetual confusion of the pretended knowledge, pretended happiness, pretended virtue, of the rich and powerful who trample upon them! This is a fair specimen of the exaggerations with which exaggeration is rebuked, in Mr. Taine's and much similar criticism.
[182] It's interesting that despite having such a strong opposing view, and with an equally misguided admiration, for a book that overall fell short, Mr. Taine describes Hard Times as the one Dickens novel that summarizes all the others. He praises instinct over reason and the feelings of the heart over practical knowledge; he criticizes all education based on statistics and facts; he ridicules and mourns the practical, business-minded people; he takes a stand against the pride, harshness, and selfishness of the wealthy and noble; he condemns industrial towns for trapping people in pollution and lies; and he contrasts the satire of social oppression with a high praise for the oppressed. He looks for poor workers, magicians, or circus performers as examples of common sense, kindness, generosity, sensitivity, and bravery, endlessly challenging the supposed knowledge, happiness, and virtue of the rich and powerful who oppress them! This is a prime example of the exaggerations used to criticize exaggeration in Mr. Taine's and similar critiques.
[183] Here is a note at the close. "Tavistock House. Look at that! Boulogne, of course. Friday, 14th of July, 1854. I am three parts mad, and the fourth delirious, with perpetual rushing at Hard Times. I have done what I hope is a good thing with Stephen, taking his story as a whole; and hope to be over in town with the end of the book on Wednesday night. . . . I have been looking forward through so many weeks and sides of paper to this Stephen business, that now—as usual—it being over, I feel as if nothing in the world, in the way of intense and violent rushing hither and thither, could quite restore my balance."
[183] Here’s a note at the end. "Tavistock House. Look at that! Boulogne, of course. Friday, July 14, 1854. I’m feeling mostly crazy, and a little delirious, from constantly racing through Hard Times. I think I’ve done something good with Stephen, looking at his story as a whole; and I hope to be back in town with the finished book by Wednesday night. . . . I’ve been looking forward for weeks, flipping through so many pages, to this whole Stephen thing, that now—like usual—now that it’s done, I feel like nothing in the world, in terms of the intense and frantic running around, could really bring me back to normal."
[184] "I have hope of Mr. Morley—whom one cannot see without knowing to be a straightforward, earnest man. Travers, too, I think a man of the Anti-corn-law-league order. I also think Higgins will materially help them. Generally I quite agree with you that they hardly know what to be at; but it is an immensely difficult subject to start, and they must have every allowance. At any rate, it is not by leaving them alone and giving them no help, that they can be urged on to success." 29th of March 1855.
[184] "I have hope for Mr. Morley—who you can tell is a honest, genuine person as soon as you meet him. I also think Travers is a typical member of the Anti-Corn Law League. I believe Higgins will significantly support them. Overall, I mostly agree with you that they don’t really know how to proceed; however, starting this conversation is incredibly challenging, and we need to be patient with them. In any case, simply leaving them to figure it out on their own without any support won't lead them to success." March 29, 1855.
[185] "The Government hit took immensely, but I'm afraid to look at the report, these things are so ill done. It came into my head as I was walking about at Hampstead yesterday. . . . On coming away I told B. we must have a toastmaster in future less given to constant drinking while the speeches are going on. B. replied 'Yes sir, you are quite right sir, he has no head whatever sir, look at him now sir'—Toastmaster was weakly contemplating the coats and hats—'do you not find it difficult to keep your hands off him sir, he ought to have his head knocked against the wall sir,—and he should sir, I assure you sir, if he was not in too debased a condition to be aware of it sir.'" April 3rd 1855.
[185] "The government impact was huge, but I'm hesitant to look at the report because it's poorly done. It crossed my mind while I was walking around Hampstead yesterday. On the way out, I told B. that we need to have a toastmaster in the future who drinks less during the speeches. B. responded, 'Yes, you're absolutely right; he doesn't have a clue, just look at him now'—the toastmaster was weakly staring at the coats and hats—'don't you find it hard not to smack him, he should have his head banged against the wall—he should, I assure you, if he wasn't in such a low state to even realize it.'" April 3rd 1855.
[186] For the scene of the Eddystone Lighthouse at this little play, afterwards placed in a frame in the hall at Gadshill, a thousand guineas was given at the Dickens sale. It occupied the great painter only one or two mornings, and Dickens will tell how it originated. Walking on Hampstead Heath to think over his Theatrical Fund speech, he met Mr. Lemon, and they went together to Stanfield. "He has been very ill, and he told us that large pictures are too much for him, and he must confine himself to small ones. But I would not have this, I declared he must paint bigger ones than ever, and what would he think of beginning upon an act-drop for a proposed vast theatre at Tavistock House? He laughed and caught at this, we cheered him up very much, and he said he was quite a man again." April 1855.
[186] For the scene of the Eddystone Lighthouse in this little play, which was later framed and displayed in the hall at Gadshill, a thousand guineas was paid at the Dickens sale. It took the great painter only a morning or two to complete, and Dickens recounts how it came about. While walking on Hampstead Heath to prepare his speech for the Theatrical Fund, he ran into Mr. Lemon, and they decided to visit Stanfield together. "He has been very ill, and he told us that large paintings are too much for him, and he needs to stick to smaller ones. But I disagreed; I insisted he should paint larger ones than ever, and I asked what he thought about starting on an act-drop for a proposed large theater at Tavistock House? He laughed and embraced the idea, we really lifted his spirits, and he said he felt like himself again." April 1855.
[187] Sitting at Nisi Prius not long before, the Chief Justice, with the same eccentric liking for literature, had committed what was called at the time a breach of judicial decorum. (Such indecorums were less uncommon in the great days of the Bench.) "The name," he said, "of the illustrious Charles Dickens has been called on the jury, but he has not answered. If his great Chancery suit had been still going on, I certainly would have excused him, but, as that is over, he might have done us the honour of attending here, that he might have seen how we went on at common law."
[187] Not long ago, while sitting at Nisi Prius, the Chief Justice, who had a quirky fondness for literature, committed what was then called a breach of judicial decorum. (Such breaches were less unusual in the earlier days of the Bench.) "The name," he said, "of the famous Charles Dickens has been brought up to the jury, but he has not shown up. If his important Chancery suit were still ongoing, I would have certainly excused him, but since that’s over, he could have graced us with his presence here to see how we handle things at common law."
[188] Prices are reported in one of the letters; and, considering what they have been since, the touch of disappointment hinted at may raise a smile. "Provisions are scarcely as cheap as I expected, though very different from London: besides which, a pound weight here, is a pound and a quarter English. So that meat at 7d. a pound, is actually a fourth less. A capital dish of asparagus costs us about fivepence; a fowl, one and threepence; a duck, a few halfpence more; a dish of fish, about a shilling. The very best wine at tenpence that I ever drank—I used to get it very good for the same money in Genoa, but not so good. The common people very engaging and obliging."
[188] Prices are mentioned in one of the letters; and considering what they've been since, the hint of disappointment may bring a smile. "Food is not as cheap as I thought, although it's quite different from London: plus, a pound here is actually a pound and a quarter compared to England. So, meat at 7d. a pound is really about a fourth less. A nice dish of asparagus costs us around five pence; a chicken, one and three pence; a duck, just a few half pence more; a dish of fish, about a shilling. The best wine I ever had for ten pence—I used to get the same quality for that price in Genoa, but this isn’t quite as good. The locals are very friendly and helpful."
[189] Besides the old friends before named, Thackeray and his family were here in the early weeks, living "in a melancholy but very good chateau on the Paris road, where their landlord (a Baron) has supplied them, T. tells me, with one milk-jug as the entire crockery of the establishment." Our friend soon tired of this, going off to Spa, and on his return, after ascending the hill to smoke a farewell cigar with Dickens, left for London and Scotland in October.
[189] Besides the old friends mentioned earlier, Thackeray and his family were here in the early weeks, living "in a gloomy but very nice chateau on the Paris road, where their landlord (a Baron) has provided them, T. tells me, with just one milk jug as the entire dishware of the place." Our friend quickly grew tired of this, heading off to Spa, and upon his return, after climbing the hill to smoke a farewell cigar with Dickens, left for London and Scotland in October.
[190] Another of his letters questioned even the picturesqueness a little, for he discovered that on a sunny day the white tents, seen from a distance, looked exactly like an immense washing establishment with all the linen put out to dry.
[190] Another one of his letters even questioned the charm a bit, since he realized that on a sunny day, the white tents, seen from afar, looked just like a huge laundromat with all the laundry spread out to dry.
[192] The picture had changed drearily in less than a year and a half, when (17th of Feb. 1856) Dickens thus wrote from Paris. "I suppose mortal man out of bed never looked so ill and worn as the Emperor does just now. He passed close by me on horseback, as I was coming in at the door on Friday, and I never saw so haggard a face. Some English saluted him, and he lifted his hand to his hat as slowly, painfully, and laboriously, as if his arm were made of lead. I think he must be in pain."
[192] The situation had taken a gloomy turn in just a year and a half, when (February 17, 1856) Dickens wrote from Paris. "I suppose no one looks as ill and worn as the Emperor does right now. He rode right past me on horseback as I was walking in the door on Friday, and I've never seen a face that looked so haggard. Some English people greeted him, and he raised his hand to his hat as slowly, painfully, and laboriously as if his arm were made of lead. I think he must be in pain."
[193] I permit myself to quote from the bill of one of his entertainments in the old merry days at Bonchurch (ii. 425-434), of course drawn up by himself, whom it describes as "The Unparalleled Necromancer Rhia Rhama Rhoos, educated cabalistically in the Orange Groves of Salamanca and the Ocean Caves of Alum Bay," some of whose proposed wonders it thus prefigures:
[193] I want to share a quote from the program of one of his shows during the fun times at Bonchurch (ii. 425-434), which he obviously wrote himself, describing him as "The Unmatched Necromancer Rhia Rhama Rhoos, trained mystically in the Orange Groves of Salamanca and the Ocean Caves of Alum Bay." It outlines some of the exciting wonders he proposed:
Two Cards being drawn from the Pack by two of the company, and placed, with the Pack, in the Necromancer's box, will leap forth at the command of any lady of not less than eight, or more than eighty, years of age.
Two cards drawn from the deck by two people in the group, and placed, along with the deck, in the Necromancer's box, will jump out at the command of any lady who is at least eight and no older than eighty years.
*** This wonder is the result of nine years' seclusion in the mines of Russia.
*** This marvel comes from nine years of isolation in the mines of Russia.
A shilling being lent to the Necromancer by any gentleman of not less than twelve months, or more than one hundred years, of age, and carefully marked by the said gentleman, will disappear from within a brazen box at the word of command, and pass through the hearts of an infinity of boxes, which will afterwards build themselves into pyramids and sink into a small mahogany box, at the Necromancer's bidding.
A shilling lent to the Necromancer by any gentleman who is at least twelve months old but not over one hundred years old, and carefully marked by that gentleman, will vanish from a brass box at a word of command and travel through countless boxes. These boxes will then form into pyramids and settle into a small mahogany box, all at the Necromancer's command.
*** Five thousand guineas were paid for the acquisition of this wonder, to a Chinese Mandarin, who died of grief immediately after parting with the secret.
*** Five thousand guineas were paid to a Chinese Mandarin for this amazing thing, who died from sadness right after sharing the secret.
A Card being drawn from the Pack by any lady, not under a direct and positive promise of marriage, will be immediately named by the Necromancer, destroyed by fire, and reproduced from its own ashes.
A card drawn from the deck by any woman, not under a clear and definite promise of marriage, will be immediately identified by the Necromancer, destroyed by fire, and brought back from its own ashes.
*** An annuity of one thousand pounds has been offered to the Necromancer by the Directors of the Sun Fire Office for the secret of this wonder—and refused!!!
*** A thousand-pound annuity was offered to the Necromancer by the Directors of the Sun Fire Office for the secret of this miracle—and it was turned down!!!
The watch of any truly prepossessing lady, of any age, single or married, being locked by the Necromancer in a strong box, will fly at the word of command from within that box into the heart of an ordinary half-quartern loaf, whence it shall be cut out in the presence of the whole company, whose cries of astonishment will be audible at a distance of some miles.
The watch of any truly attractive woman, of any age, whether single or married, locked by the Necromancer in a strong box, will fly at the command from inside that box into the heart of an ordinary half-quart loaf, from which it will be cut out in front of the whole group, whose cries of astonishment will be heard from miles away.
*** Ten years in the Plains of Tartary were devoted to the study of this wonder.
*** Ten years in the Tartary plains were spent studying this marvel.
The travelling doll is composed of solid wood throughout, but, by putting on a travelling dress of the simplest construction, becomes invisible, performs enormous journeys in half a minute, and passes from visibility to invisibility with an expedition so astonishing that no eye can follow its transformations.
The traveling doll is made of solid wood, but by putting on a simple travel dress, it becomes invisible, makes huge journeys in thirty seconds, and shifts from visible to invisible so quickly that no one can track its changes.
*** The Necromancer's attendant usually faints on beholding this wonder, and is only to be revived by the administration of brandy and water.
*** The Necromancer's assistant typically passes out when witnessing this marvel, and can only be brought back to consciousness with a mix of brandy and water.
The company having agreed among themselves to offer to the Necromancer, by way of loan, the hat of any gentleman whose head has arrived at maturity of size, the Necromancer, without removing that hat for an instant from before the eyes of the delighted company, will light a fire in it, make a plum pudding in his magic saucepan, boil it over the said fire, produce it in two minutes, thoroughly done, cut it, and dispense it in portions to the whole company, for their consumption then and there; returning the hat at last, wholly uninjured by fire, to its lawful owner.
The company agreed to lend the Necromancer the hat of any gentleman whose head is fully grown. The Necromancer, without taking the hat out of sight of the excited company, will magically light a fire in it, make a plum pudding in his enchanted saucepan, boil it over that fire, and produce it in just two minutes, perfectly cooked. He’ll then slice it and serve it in portions to everyone present, allowing them to enjoy it right then and there, finally returning the hat, completely unharmed by the fire, to its rightful owner.
*** The extreme liberality of this wonder awakening the jealousy of the beneficent Austrian Government, when exhibited in Milan, the Necromancer had the honour to be seized, and confined for five years in the fortress of that city.
*** The overwhelming generosity of this wonder, which sparked jealousy from the kind Austrian Government, led to the Necromancer being captured and imprisoned for five years in the fortress of that city in Milan.
[195] I cannot take leave of M. Beaucourt without saying that I am necessarily silent as to the most touching traits recorded of him by Dickens, because they refer to the generosity shown by him to an English family in occupation of another of his houses, in connection with whom his losses must have been considerable, but for whom he had nothing but help and sympathy. Replying to some questions about them, put by Dickens one day, he had only enlarged on their sacrifices and self-denials. "Ah that family, unfortunate! 'And you, Monsieur Beaucourt,' I said to him, 'you are unfortunate too, God knows!' Upon which he said in the pleasantest way in the world, Ah, Monsieur Dickens, thank you, don't speak of it!—And backed himself down the avenue with his cap in his hand, as if he were going to back himself straight into the evening star, without the ceremony of dying first. I never did see such a gentle, kind heart."
[195] I can't part ways with M. Beaucourt without mentioning that I have to remain quiet about the most touching things Dickens wrote about him. These relate to his generosity toward an English family living in one of his other houses, a situation that must have caused him significant losses, yet he offered them nothing but help and compassion. When Dickens asked him questions about them one day, he focused solely on their sacrifices and selflessness. "Oh, that unfortunate family! And you, Monsieur Beaucourt," I said to him, "you are unfortunate too, God knows!" To which he replied, in the friendliest tone, "Ah, Monsieur Dickens, thank you, but let’s not talk about it!"—and then he backed down the path with his cap in hand, as if he were going to glide straight into the evening star without the fuss of dying first. I've never seen such a gentle, kind heart.
[196] Twenty-one years before this date, in this same part, Lemaitre had made a deep impression in London; and now, eighteen years later, he is appearing in one of the revivals of Victor Hugo in Paris (1873.)
[196] Twenty-one years before this, in the same area, Lemaitre had made a strong impact in London; and now, eighteen years later, he is starring in one of the revivals of Victor Hugo in Paris (1873).
[197] "It is surprising what a change nine years have made in my notoriety here. So many of the rising French generation now read English (and Chuzzlewit is now being translated daily in the Moniteur), that I can't go into a shop and give my card without being acknowledged in the pleasantest way possible. A curiosity-dealer brought home some little knick-knacks I had bought, the other night, and knew all about my books from beginning to end of 'em. There is much of the personal friendliness in my readers, here, that is so delightful at home; and I have been greatly surprised and pleased by the unexpected discovery." To this I may add a line from one of his letters six years later. "I see my books in French at every railway station great and small."—13th of Oct. 1862.
[197] "It's amazing how much my reputation has changed here in nine years. So many young French people are now reading English (and Chuzzlewit is being translated daily in the Moniteur) that I can't go into a shop and hand over my card without being recognized in the nicest way possible. A curiosity dealer brought back some little trinkets I bought the other night, and he knew all about my books from start to finish. There's a lot of personal warmth from my readers here, which is just as delightful as it is back home; and I've been pleasantly surprised by this unexpected discovery." To this, I can add a line from one of his letters six years later: "I see my books in French at every train station, big and small."—13th of Oct. 1862.
[198] "I forget whether" (6th of Jan. 1856) "I have already told you that I have received a proposal from a responsible bookselling house here, for a complete edition, authorized by myself, of a French translation of all my books. The terms involve questions of space and amount of matter; but I should say, at a rough calculation, that I shall get about £300 by it—perhaps £50 more." "I have arranged" (30th of Jan.) "with the French bookselling house to receive, by monthly payments of £40, the sum of £440 for the right to translate all my books: that is, what they call my Romances, and what I call my Stories. This does not include the Christmas Books, American Notes, Pictures from Italy, or the Sketches; but they are to have the right to translate them for extra payments if they choose. In consideration of this venture as to the unprotected property, I cede them the right of translating all future Romances at a thousand francs (£40) each. Considering that I get so much for what is otherwise worth nothing, and get my books before so clever and important a people, I think this is not a bad move?" The first friend with whom he advised about it, I should mention, was the famous Leipzig publisher, M. Tauchnitz, in whose judgment, as well as in his honour and good faith, he had implicit reliance, and who thought the offer fair. On the 17th of April he wrote: "On Monday I am going to dine with all my translators at Hachette's, the bookseller who has made the bargain for the complete edition, and who began this week to pay his monthly £40 for a year. I don't mean to go out any more. Please to imagine me in the midst of my French dressers." He wrote an address for the Edition in which he praised the liberality of his publishers and expressed his pride in being so presented to the French people whom he sincerely loved and honoured. Another word may be added. "It is rather appropriate that the French translation edition will pay my rent for the whole year, and travelling charges to boot."—24th of Feb. 1856.
[198] "I can't remember if" (Jan 6, 1856) "I already mentioned that I've received an offer from a well-known bookselling house here for a complete edition, approved by me, of a French translation of all my books. The terms involve discussions about space and content; but I estimate I’ll earn about £300 from it—maybe an extra £50." "I've arranged" (Jan 30) "with the French bookselling house to receive monthly payments of £40, totaling £440 for the rights to translate all my books: that is, what they call my Romances, and what I refer to as my Stories. This does not cover the Christmas Books, American Notes, Pictures from Italy, or the Sketches; however, they can obtain the rights to translate those for additional payments if they wish. For this venture regarding my unprotected works, I grant them the right to translate all future Romances for a thousand francs (£40) each. Considering I'm getting so much for something that would otherwise be worthless, and getting my books in front of such a clever and important audience, I think this is a good move?" The first friend he consulted about it was the renowned Leipzig publisher, M. Tauchnitz, whose judgment, honor, and integrity he completely trusted, and who thought the offer was fair. On April 17, he wrote: "On Monday, I'm having dinner with all my translators at Hachette's, the bookseller who secured the deal for the complete edition, and who started paying his monthly £40 this week for a year. I don’t plan to go out anymore. Please imagine me surrounded by my French colleagues." He wrote a message for the Edition praising his publishers' generosity and expressing his pride in being introduced to the French people, whom he truly loved and respected. One more thing to mention: "It’s quite fitting that the French translation edition will cover my rent for the entire year, along with travel expenses."—Feb 24, 1856.
[199] He wrote a short and very comical account of one of these stock performances at the Français in which he brought out into strong relief all their conventionalities and formal habits, their regular surprises surprising nobody, and their mysterious disclosures of immense secrets known to everybody beforehand, which he meant for Household Words; but it occurred to him that it might give pain to Regnier, and he destroyed it.
[199] He wrote a brief and very funny account of one of these stock performances at the Français, highlighting all their clichés and formal routines, their predictable surprises that caught no one off guard, and their so-called revelations of huge secrets that everyone already knew about. He intended to submit it to Household Words; however, he worried it might upset Regnier, so he decided to destroy it.
[200] Before he saw this he wrote: "That piece you spoke of (the Médecin des Enfants) is one of the very best melodramas I have ever read. Situations, admirable. I will send it to you by Landseer. I am very curious indeed to go and see it; and it is an instance to me of the powerful emotions from which art is shut out in England by the conventionalities." After seeing it he writes: "The low cry of excitement and expectation that goes round the house when any one of the great situations is felt to be coming is very remarkable indeed. I suppose there has not been so great a success of the genuine and worthy kind (for the authors have really taken the French dramatic bull by the horns, and put the adulterous wife in the right position), for many years. When you come over and see it, you will say you never saw anything so admirably done. There is one actor, Bignon (M. Delormel), who has a good deal of Macready in him; sometimes looks very like him; and who seems to me the perfection of manly good sense." 17th of April 1856.
[200] Before he saw this he wrote: "That piece you mentioned (the Médecin des Enfants) is one of the best melodramas I've ever read. The situations are outstanding. I'll send it to you via Landseer. I'm really eager to see it; and it shows me the strong emotions that art is often blocked from in England because of conventions." After seeing it he writes: "The low murmur of excitement and anticipation that spreads through the audience when any of the key moments is about to happen is truly remarkable. I don’t think there's been such a significant and genuine success (the authors have boldly tackled the French dramatic tradition and properly placed the adulterous wife) in many years. When you come over and see it, you'll say you've never seen anything done so well. There's one actor, Bignon (M. Delormel), who has quite a bit of Macready in him; sometimes he looks just like him; and he seems to me to embody perfect manly common sense." 17th of April 1856.
[201] I subjoin from another of these French letters of later date a remark on Robinson Crusoe. "You remember my saying to you some time ago how curious I thought it that Robinson Crusoe should be the only instance of an universally popular book that could make no one laugh and could make no one cry. I have been reading it again just now, in the course of my numerous refreshings at those English wells, and I will venture to say that there is not in literature a more surprising instance of an utter want of tenderness and sentiment, than the death of Friday. It is as heartless as Gil Blas, in a very different and far more serious way. But the second part altogether will not bear enquiry. In the second part of Don Quixote are some of the finest things. But the second part of Robinson Crusoe is perfectly contemptible, in the glaring defect that it exhibits the man who was 30 years on that desert island with no visible effect made on his character by that experience. De Foe's women too—Robinson Crusoe's wife for instance—are terrible dull commonplace fellows without breeches; and I have no doubt he was a precious dry and disagreeable article himself—I mean De Foe: not Robinson. Poor dear Goldsmith (I remember as I write) derived the same impression."
[201] I’m quoting from another one of these later French letters a comment about Robinson Crusoe. "You may recall my mentioning to you some time ago how odd I found it that Robinson Crusoe is the only universally popular book that doesn’t make anyone laugh or cry. I’ve just been reading it again while taking breaks at those English wells, and I must say there’s no other book that shows such a complete lack of emotion and feeling than the death of Friday. It’s as heartless as Gil Blas, in a very different and much more serious way. But the second part is entirely unworthy of scrutiny. The second part of Don Quixote contains some of the finest moments. However, the second part of Robinson Crusoe is completely worthless, especially for the glaring flaw that it portrays a man who spent 30 years on that deserted island with no noticeable change in his character from that experience. Defoe’s women too—like Robinson Crusoe’s wife—are painfully dull and ordinary, and I have no doubt he himself was a rather dry and unpleasant person—I mean Defoe, not Robinson. Poor dear Goldsmith (I remember as I write) had the same impression."
[202] When in Paris six years later Dickens saw this fine singer in an opera by Gluck, and the reader will not be sorry to have his description of it. "Last night I saw Madame Viardot do Gluck's Orphée. It is a most extraordinary performance—pathetic in the highest degree, and full of quite sublime acting. Though it is unapproachably fine from first to last, the beginning of it, at the tomb of Eurydice, is a thing that I cannot remember at this moment of writing, without emotion. It is the finest presentation of grief that I can imagine. And when she has received hope from the Gods, and encouragement to go into the other world and seek Eurydice, Viardot's manner of taking the relinquished lyre from the tomb and becoming radiant again, is most noble. Also she recognizes Eurydice's touch, when at length the hand is put in hers from behind, like a most transcendant genius. And when, yielding to Eurydice's entreaties she has turned round and slain her with a look, her despair over the body is grand in the extreme. It is worth a journey to Paris to see, for there is no such Art to be otherwise looked upon. Her husband stumbled over me by mere chance, and took me to her dressing-room. Nothing could have happened better as a genuine homage to the performance, for I was disfigured with crying."—30th of November 1862.
[202] Six years later in Paris, Dickens watched this amazing singer perform in an opera by Gluck, and readers will appreciate his description of it. "Last night I saw Madame Viardot perform Gluck's Orphée. It is an extraordinary performance—heartbreaking to the highest degree and filled with truly sublime acting. While it is brilliantly executed from start to finish, the beginning, at the tomb of Eurydice, is something I can't recall at this moment without feeling emotional. It's the best portrayal of grief I can imagine. When she receives hope from the Gods and encouragement to venture into the underworld to find Eurydice, Viardot’s way of taking the abandoned lyre from the tomb and becoming radiant again is incredibly noble. She also recognizes Eurydice's touch when, at last, the hand is placed in hers from behind, like a transcendent genius. And when, yielding to Eurydice's pleas, she turns around and kills her with a look, her despair over the body is extremely grand. It's worth a trip to Paris to see because there’s no other Art like it. Her husband happened to bump into me and took me to her dressing room. Nothing could have been a better tribute to the performance, as I was all teary from crying."—30th of November 1862.
[203] Here is another picture of Regiments in the Streets of which the date is the 30th of January. "It was cold this afternoon, as bright as Italy, and these Elysian Fields crowded with carriages, riders, and foot passengers. All the fountains were playing, all the Heavens shining. Just as I went out at 4 o'clock, several regiments that had passed out at the Barrière in the morning to exercise in the country, came marching back, in the straggling French manner, which is far more picturesque and real than anything you can imagine in that way. Alternately great storms of drums played, and then the most delicious and skilful bands, 'Trovatore' music, 'Barber of Seville' music, all sorts of music with well-marked melody and time. All bloused Paris (led by the Inimitable, and a poor cripple who works himself up and down all day in a big wheeled car) went at quick march down the avenue, in a sort of hilarious dance. If the colours with the golden eagle on the top had only been unfurled, we should have followed them anywhere, in any cause—much as the children follow Punches in the better cause of Comedy. Napoleon on the top of the Column seemed up to the whole thing, I thought."
[203] Here’s another picture of regiments in the streets dated January 30th. "It was cold this afternoon, as bright as Italy, and these Elysian Fields were packed with carriages, riders, and pedestrians. All the fountains were flowing, and the sky was clear. Just as I stepped out at 4 o'clock, several regiments that had headed out through the Barrière in the morning to drill in the countryside were coming back, marching in that relaxed French style, which is much more vibrant and authentic than you could ever imagine. Occasionally, there were loud bursts from the drums, followed by the most amazing and skilled bands playing music from 'Trovatore,' 'Barber of Seville,' and all kinds of tunes with clear melodies and rhythms. All of Paris, led by the Inimitable and a poor disabled man who moves up and down all day in a big wheeled cart, marched quickly down the avenue in what felt like a joyful dance. If the flags with the golden eagle at the top had just been raised, we would have followed them anywhere, for any cause—much like children following Punch in the better cause of Comedy. Napoleon at the top of the Column seemed to be enjoying the whole thing, I thought."
[204] Apropos of this, I may mention that the little shaggy white terrier who came with him from America, so long a favourite in his household, had died of old age a few weeks before (5th of Oct. 1855) in Boulogne.
[204] In this regard, I should note that the small, fluffy white terrier he brought with him from America, a long-time favorite in his home, passed away from old age a few weeks ago (October 5, 1855) in Boulogne.
[205] "We have wet weather here—and dark too for these latitudes—and oceans of mud. Although numbers of men are perpetually scooping and sweeping it away in this thoroughfare, it accumulates under the windows so fast, and in such sludgy masses, that to get across the road is to get half over one's shoes in the first outset of a walk." . . . "It is difficult," he added (20th of Jan.) "to picture the change made in this place by the removal of the paving stones (too ready for barricades), and macadamization. It suits neither the climate nor the soil. We are again in a sea of mud. One cannot cross the road of the Champs Elysées here, without being half over one's boots." A few more days brought a welcome change. "Three days ago the weather changed here in an hour, and we have had bright weather and hard frost ever since. All the mud disappeared with marvellous rapidity, and the sky became Italian. Taking advantage of such a happy change, I started off yesterday morning (for exercise and meditation) on a scheme I have taken into my head, to walk round the walls of Paris. It is a very odd walk, and will make a good description. Yesterday I turned to the right when I got outside the Barrière de l'Etoile, walked round the wall till I came to the river, and then entered Paris beyond the site of the Bastille. To-day I mean to turn to the left when I get outside the Barrière, and see what comes of that."
[205] "We have wet weather here—it's also pretty dark for this region—and there's tons of mud. Even though lots of people are constantly scooping and sweeping it away on this main street, it builds up so quickly under the windows in such thick, sludgy piles that stepping onto the road means getting half your shoes covered right from the start of a walk." . . . "It's hard," he added (20th of Jan.) "to imagine how much this place has changed since they removed the paving stones (which were too easy to use for barricades) and switched to macadam. It’s not suited for the climate or the soil. We're back to being in a sea of mud. You can't cross the Champs Elysées here without getting your boots half-soaked." A few days later, there was a welcome change. "Three days ago, the weather shifted in just an hour, and we've had sunny weather and hard frost ever since. All the mud vanished incredibly fast, and the sky turned Italian. Taking advantage of this lovely change, I set off yesterday morning (for some exercise and reflection) on a plan I came up with to walk around the walls of Paris. It's a pretty unusual walk and should make an interesting description. Yesterday, I turned right when I got outside the Barrière de l'Etoile, walked around the wall until I reached the river, then entered Paris beyond where the Bastille used to be. Today, I plan to turn left when I get outside the Barrière and see what happens."
[206] This was much the tone of Edwin Landseer also, whose praise of Horace Vernet was nothing short of rapture; and how well I remember the humour of his description of the Emperor on the day when the prizes were given, and, as his old friend the great painter came up, the comical expression in his face that said plainly "What a devilish odd thing this is altogether, isn't it?" composing itself to gravity as he took Edwin by the hand, and said in cordial English "I am very glad to see you." He stood, Landseer told us, in a recess so arranged as to produce a clear echo of every word he said, and this had a startling effect. In the evening of that day Dickens, Landseer, Boxall, Leslie "and three others" dined together in the Palais Royal.
[206] Edwin Landseer had a similar tone, and his admiration for Horace Vernet was nothing short of enthusiastic; I distinctly remember the humor in his description of the Emperor on the day the awards were presented. When his old friend, the great painter, approached, the comical look on his face clearly conveyed, "What a bizarre situation this is, isn't it?" His expression turned serious as he greeted Edwin and warmly said in friendly English, "I’m very glad to see you." Landseer told us he was standing in a spot designed to create a perfect echo of everything he said, which had a surprising impact. That evening, Dickens, Landseer, Boxall, Leslie, "and three others" had dinner together in the Palais Royal.
[207] The framework for this sketch was a graphic description, also done by Dickens, of the celebrated Charity at Rochester founded in the sixteenth century by Richard Watts, "for six poor travellers, who, not being Rogues or Proctors, may receive gratis for one night, lodging, entertainment, and fourpence each." A quaint monument to Watts is the most prominent object on the wall of the south-west transept of the cathedral, and underneath it is now placed a brass thus inscribed: "Charles Dickens. Born at Portsmouth, seventh of February 1812. Died at Gadshill Place by Rochester, ninth of June 1870. Buried in Westminster Abbey. To connect his memory with the scenes in which his earliest and his latest years were passed, and with the associations of Rochester Cathedral and its neighbourhood which extended over all his life, this Tablet, with the sanction of the Dean and Chapter, is placed by his Executors."
[207] The basis for this sketch was a vivid account, also written by Dickens, of the famous Charity in Rochester established in the sixteenth century by Richard Watts, "for six poor travelers, who, not being Rogues or Proctors, may receive free lodging, meals, and fourpence each for one night." A charming monument to Watts is the most prominent feature on the wall of the southwest transept of the cathedral, and below it is now a brass plate inscribed as follows: "Charles Dickens. Born in Portsmouth, February 7, 1812. Died at Gadshill Place near Rochester, June 9, 1870. Buried in Westminster Abbey. To link his memory with the places where he spent his earliest and latest years, and with the connections to Rochester Cathedral and its surroundings that spanned his entire life, this Tablet is placed by his Executors with the approval of the Dean and Chapter."
[208] So curious a contrast, taking Copperfield for the purpose, I have thought worth giving in fac-simile; and can assure the reader that the examples taken express very fairly the general character of the Notes to the two books respectively.
[208] It's such an interesting contrast, using Copperfield as an example, that I thought it was worth sharing exactly as it is; and I can assure the reader that the examples chosen represent quite well the overall character of the Notes for both books.
[209] In the same letter was an illustration of the ruling passion in death, which, even in so undignified a subject, might have interested Pope. "You remember little Wieland who did grotesque demons so well. Did you ever hear how he died? He lay very still in bed with the life fading out of him—suddenly sprung out of it, threw what is professionally called a flip-flap, and fell dead on the floor."
[209] In the same letter was an example of the strong passion in death, which, even in such an undignified situation, might have caught Pope's interest. "You remember little Wieland, who created those wild demons so well. Did you ever hear how he passed away? He lay very still in bed with life slipping away from him—then suddenly jumped out of it, did what’s known as a flip-flap, and collapsed dead on the floor."
[210] One of its incidents made such an impression on him that it will be worth while to preserve his description of it. "I have been (by mere accident) seeing the serpents fed to-day, with the live birds, rabbits, and guinea pigs—a sight so very horrible that I cannot get rid of the impression, and am, at this present, imagining serpents coming up the legs of the table, with their infernal flat heads, and their tongues like the Devil's tail (evidently taken from that model, in the magic lanterns and other such popular representations), elongated for dinner. I saw one small serpent, whose father was asleep, go up to a guinea pig (white and yellow, and with a gentle eye—every hair upon him erect with horror); corkscrew himself on the tip of his tail; open a mouth which couldn't have swallowed the guinea pig's nose; dilate a throat which wouldn't have made him a stocking; and show him what his father meant to do with him when he came out of that ill-looking Hookah into which he had resolved himself. The guinea pig backed against the side of the cage—said 'I know it, I know it!'—and his eye glared and his coat turned wiry, as he made the remark. Five small sparrows crouching together in a little trench at the back of the cage, peeped over the brim of it, all the time; and when they saw the guinea pig give it up, and the young serpent go away looking at him over about two yards and a quarter of shoulder, struggled which should get into the innermost angle and be seized last. Everyone of them then hid his eyes in another's breast, and then they all shook together like dry leaves—as I daresay they may be doing now, for old Hookah was as dull as laudanum. . . . Please to imagine two small serpents, one beginning on the tail of a white mouse, and one on the head, and each pulling his own way, and the mouse very much alive all the time, with the middle of him madly writhing."
[210] One event stuck with him so much that it's worth keeping his description of it. "Today, by sheer chance, I watched the snakes being fed, with live birds, rabbits, and guinea pigs—a sight so horrifying that I can't shake the image. Right now, I'm imagining snakes creeping up the legs of the table, with their nasty flat heads and tongues like the Devil’s tail (clearly inspired by those images in magic lanterns and other popular depictions), stretched out for dinner. I saw one small snake, whose dad was asleep, slither up to a guinea pig (white and yellow, with a gentle gaze—every hair on him standing up in fear); it coiled on the tip of its tail, opened a mouth that could barely fit over the guinea pig's nose, stretched a throat that wouldn't even fit a stocking, and showed him what his dad planned to do when he came out of that frightening hookah he had decided to curl up in. The guinea pig pressed itself against the side of the cage—thinking 'I know it, I know it!'—its eyes wide and fur bristling as it realized what was happening. Five small sparrows huddled together in a little trench at the back of the cage, peeking over the edge, and when they saw the guinea pig give up, and the young snake leave while glancing back at him over two yards and a quarter, they scrambled to find the safest spot to hide last. Each of them then buried their eyes in another's feathers, trembling together like dry leaves—as I bet they still are, since old Hookah was as dull as laudanum. . . . Imagine two small snakes, one starting at the tail of a white mouse, and the other at the head, each pulling in different directions while the mouse remained very much alive, its middle writhing madly."
[211] There was a situation in the Frozen Deep where Richard Wardour, played by Dickens, had thus to carry about Frank Aldersley in the person of Wilkie Collins.
[211] There was a scene in the Frozen Deep where Richard Wardour, played by Dickens, had to carry Frank Aldersley, portrayed by Wilkie Collins.
[212] The mention of a performance of Lord Lytton's Money at the theatre will supply the farce to this tragedy. "I have rarely seen anything finer than Lord Glossmore, a chorus-singer in bluchers, drab trowsers, and a brown sack; and Dudley Smooth, in somebody else's wig, hindside before. Stout also, in anything he could lay hold of. The waiter at the club had an immense moustache, white trowsers, and a striped jacket; and he brought everybody who came in, a vinegar-cruet. The man who read the will began thus: 'I so-and-so, being of unsound mind but firm in body . . .' In spite of all this, however, the real character, humour, wit, and good writing of the comedy, made themselves apparent; and the applause was loud and repeated, and really seemed genuine. Its capital things were not lost altogether. It was succeeded by a Jockey Dance by five ladies, who put their whips in their mouths and worked imaginary winners up to the float—an immense success."
[212] The mention of a performance of Lord Lytton's Money at the theatre adds a humorous touch to this tragedy. "I've rarely seen anything finer than Lord Glossmore, a chorus singer in clunky shoes, drab trousers, and a brown sack; and Dudley Smooth, wearing someone else's wig backward. Stout also, in whatever he could find. The waiter at the club had a huge mustache, white trousers, and a striped jacket, and he handed everyone who came in a vinegar bottle. The guy who read the will started off like this: 'I so-and-so, being of unsound mind but sound in body . . . ' Despite all this, the true character, humor, wit, and good writing of the comedy shone through; the applause was loud and continuous, and it felt sincere. Its great moments weren't completely lost. It was followed by a Jockey Dance performed by five women, who put their whips in their mouths and pretended to urge imaginary horses to the finish line—an enormous hit."
[213] Anything more completely opposed to the Micawber type could hardly be conceived, and yet there were moments (really and truly only moments) when the fancy would arise that if the conditions of his life had been reversed, something of a vagabond existence (using the word in Goldsmith's meaning) might have supervened. It would have been an unspeakable misery to him, but it might have come nevertheless. The question of hereditary transmission had a curious attraction for him, and considerations connected with it were frequently present to his mind. Of a youth who had fallen into a father's weaknesses without the possibility of having himself observed them for imitation, he thus wrote on one occasion: "It suggests the strangest consideration as to which of our own failings we are really responsible, and as to which of them we cannot quite reasonably hold ourselves to be so. What A. evidently derived from his father cannot in his case be derived from association and observation, but must be in the very principles of his individuality as a living creature."
[213] It's hard to imagine anything more different from the Micawber type, yet there were moments (really just moments) when it crossed his mind that if his life circumstances had been flipped, he might have ended up in a sort of wandering existence (using the term in Goldsmith's sense). It would have brought him immense suffering, but it could have happened nonetheless. The idea of hereditary traits fascinated him, and he often thought about it. About a young man who fell into his father’s bad habits without ever seeing him do it, he once wrote: "It raises the most curious question about which of our flaws we are truly responsible for, and which ones we can’t reasonably claim as our own. What A. clearly inherited from his father isn't something he picked up through seeing or associating; rather, it must be rooted in the very essence of who he is as a living being."
[214] "You may as well know" (20th of March 1858) "that I went on" (I designate the ladies by A and B respectively) "and propounded the matter to A, without any preparation. Result.—'I am surprised, and I should have been surprised if I had seen it in the newspaper without previous confidence from you. But nothing more. N—no. Certainly not. Nothing more. I don't see that there is anything derogatory in it, even now when you ask me that question. I think upon the whole that most people would be glad you should have the money, rather than other people. It might be misunderstood here and there, at first; but I think the thing would very soon express itself, and that your own power of making it express itself would be very great.' As she wished me to ask B, who was in another room, I did so. She was for a moment tremendously disconcerted, 'under the impression that it was to lead to the stage' (!!). Then, without knowing anything of A's opinion, closely followed it. That absurd association had never entered my head or yours; but it might enter some other heads for all that. Take these two opinions for whatever they are worth. A (being very much interested and very anxious to help to a right conclusion) proposed to ask a few people of various degrees who know what the Readings are, what they think—not compromising me, but suggesting the project afar-off, as an idea in somebody else's mind. I thanked her, and said 'Yes,' of course."
[214] "You should know" (March 20, 1858) "that I went on" (I'll refer to the ladies as A and B) "and brought the matter up with A, without any preparation. The outcome.—'I'm surprised, and I would have been surprised if I had seen it in the newspaper without your prior assurance. But that's it. N—no. Definitely not. That's all. I don't see anything wrong with it, even now that you're asking me that question. I think that most people would be glad you should have the money rather than someone else. It might be misunderstood at first here and there, but I believe it would soon become clear, and your ability to communicate that would be quite strong.' As she wanted me to ask B, who was in another room, I did. She was momentarily taken aback, 'thinking it was going to lead to the stage' (!!). Then, without knowing A's opinion, she immediately followed up on it. That ridiculous connection had never crossed my mind or yours; but it might cross someone else's. Take these two opinions for whatever they are worth. A, being very interested and eager to help reach the right conclusion, suggested asking a few people of different backgrounds who know what the Readings are, what they think—not putting me in a difficult position, but suggesting the idea as if it were someone else's. I thanked her and said 'Yes,' of course."
The guilty goddess of my wrongdoings,
That did not better for my life provide
Than public means that create public behavior.
Thence comes it that my name receives a brand;
And from that point, my nature has been subdued.
To what it works in, like the dyer's hand. . .
Feel sorry for me, then, and hope that I am renewed. . .
And in the preceding Sonnet cx.
And in the previous Sonnet 110.
And made myself a colorful outfit to see,
Gor'd mine own thoughts, sold cheap what is most dear. . .
[216] Vol. I. pp. 72-3. I repeat from that passage one or two sentences, though it is hardly fair to give them without the modifications that accompany them. "A too great confidence in himself, a sense that everything was possible to the will that would make it so, laid occasionally upon him self-imposed burdens greater than might be borne by any one with safety. In that direction there was in him, at such times, something even hard and aggressive; in his determinations a something that had almost the tone of fierceness; something in his nature that made his resolves insuperable, however hasty the opinions on which they had been formed."
[216] Vol. I. pp. 72-3. I’ll repeat a couple of sentences from that passage, even though it’s not entirely fair to present them without the context they come with. "His excessive self-confidence and the belief that anything was achievable through sheer will sometimes led him to take on self-imposed burdens that no one could safely carry. During those times, there was something in him that felt almost tough and confrontational; his decisions carried a hint of intensity; there was something in his character that made his resolutions unshakeable, no matter how impulsively they had been formed."
[217] The Board of Health returns, showing that out of every annual thousand of deaths in London, the immense proportion of four hundred were those of children under four years old, had established the necessity for such a scheme. Of course the stress of this mortality fell on the children of the poor, "dragged up rather than brought up," as Charles Lamb expressed it, and perishing unhelped by the way.
[217] The Board of Health reports that out of every thousand deaths each year in London, a staggering four hundred were children under four years old, highlighting the urgent need for such a plan. Naturally, this high rate of mortality mainly affected poor children, who were "dragged up rather than raised," as Charles Lamb put it, and often died without any assistance.
[218] Here is the rough note: in which the reader will be interested to observe the limits originally placed to the proposal. The first Readings were to comprise only the Carol, and for others a new story was to be written. He had not yet the full confidence in his power or versatility as an actor which subsequent experience gave him. "I propose to announce in a short and plain advertisement (what is quite true) that I cannot so much as answer the numerous applications that are made to me to read, and that compliance with ever so few of them is, in any reason, impossible. That I have therefore resolved upon a course of readings of the Christmas Carol both in town and country, and that those in London will take place at St. Martin's Hall on certain evenings. Those evenings will be either four or six Thursdays, in May and the beginning of June. . . . I propose an Autumn Tour, for the country, extending through August, September, and October. It would comprise the Eastern Counties, the West, Lancashire, Yorkshire, and Scotland. I should read from 35 to 40 times in this tour, at the least. At each place where there was a great success, I would myself announce that I should come back, on the turn of Christmas, to read a new Christmas story written for that purpose. This story I should first read a certain number of times in London. I have the strongest belief that by April in next year, a very large sum of money indeed would be gained by these means. Ireland would be still untouched, and I conceive America alone (if I could resolve to go there) to be worth Ten Thousand Pounds. In all these proceedings, the Business would be wholly detached from me, and I should never appear in it. I would have an office, belonging to the Readings and to nothing else, opened in London; I would have the advertisements emanating from it, and also signed by some one belonging to it; and they should always mention me as a third person—just as the Child's Hospital, for instance, in addressing the public, mentions me."
[218] Here is the rough note: readers will find it interesting to see the initial limits set on the proposal. The first readings were only supposed to include the Carol, and a new story was to be written for the others. He didn't yet have the full confidence in his skills or versatility as an actor that later experience provided. "I plan to put out a short and straightforward advertisement (which is completely true) stating that I can't respond to the many requests I receive to read, and that fulfilling even a small number of them is realistically impossible. Therefore, I have decided to hold a series of readings of the Christmas Carol in both cities and rural areas, with the London readings taking place at St. Martin's Hall on specific evenings. These evenings will be either four or six Thursdays in May and early June. . . . I also plan an Autumn Tour for the countryside, running through August, September, and October. It would cover the Eastern Counties, the West, Lancashire, Yorkshire, and Scotland. I expect to read at least 35 to 40 times during this tour. In each location where there is a significant success, I would announce that I would return around Christmas to read a new Christmas story written for that occasion. I would first read this story a number of times in London. I strongly believe that by April next year, a substantial amount of money could be made from these activities. Ireland would still remain untouched, and I think America alone (if I decided to go there) could be worth Ten Thousand Pounds. In all of these efforts, the business would be completely separate from me, and I wouldn't be involved in it. I would have an office dedicated to the Readings and nothing else set up in London; advertisements would come from it and be signed by someone associated with it, and they would always refer to me as a third party—similar to how the Child's Hospital, for instance, mentions me when addressing the public."
[219] On New Year's Day he had written from Paris. "When in London Coutts's advised me not to sell out the money for Gadshill Place (the title of my estate sir, my place down in Kent) until the conveyance was settled and ready."
[219] On New Year's Day, he wrote from Paris, "When I was in London, Coutts's advised me not to sell the money for Gadshill Place (that's the name of my estate, my place down in Kent) until the conveyance was finalized and ready."
[220] Two houses now stand on what was Sir Francis Head's estate, the Great and Little Hermitage, occupied respectively by Mr. Malleson and Mr. Hulkes, who became intimate with Dickens. Perry of the Morning Chronicle, whose town house was in that court out of Tavistock-square of which Tavistock House formed part, had occupied the Great Hermitage previously.
[220] Two houses now stand where Sir Francis Head's estate used to be, known as the Great and Little Hermitage, occupied by Mr. Malleson and Mr. Hulkes, who became friends with Dickens. Perry from the Morning Chronicle, whose city home was in the court off Tavistock Square, where Tavistock House was located, had previously lived in the Great Hermitage.
[222] "As to the carpenters," he wrote to his daughter in September 1860, "they are absolutely maddening. They are always at work yet never seem to do anything, L. was down on Friday, and said (with his eye fixed on Maidstone and rubbing his hands to conciliate his moody employer) that 'he didn't think there would be very much left to do after Saturday the 29th.' I didn't throw him out of window."
[222] "About the carpenters," he wrote to his daughter in September 1860, "they're completely infuriating. They're constantly working yet never seem to accomplish anything. L. came by on Friday and said (with his eyes on Maidstone and rubbing his hands to appease his grumpy boss) that 'he didn't think there would be very much left to do after Saturday the 29th.' I didn't throw him out the window."
[223] A passage in his paper on Tramps embodies very amusingly experience recorded in his letters of this brick-work tunnel and the sinking of the well; but I can only borrow one sentence. "The current of my uncommercial pursuits caused me only last summer to want a little body of workmen for a certain spell of work in a pleasant part of the country; and I was at one time honoured with the attendance of as many as seven-and-twenty, who were looking at six." Bits of wonderful observation are in that paper.
[223] A passage in his paper on Tramps humorously captures the experiences he shared in his letters about this brick tunnel and the well digging; however, I can only borrow one sentence. "Last summer, my uncommercial activities led me to need a small group of workers for a specific project in a nice part of the countryside, and at one point, I was honored to have as many as twenty-seven showing up while I was looking at six." There are many great observations in that paper.
[224] This was at the beginning of 1865. "The châlet," he wrote to me on the 7th of January, "is going on excellently, though the ornamental part is more slowly put together than the substantial. It will really be a very pretty thing; and in the summer (supposing it not to be blown away in the spring), the upper room will make a charming study. It is much higher than we supposed."
[224] This was at the beginning of 1865. "The châlet," he wrote to me on January 7th, "is coming along really well, although the decorative parts are taking longer to assemble than the sturdy parts. It’s going to be a very pretty place; and in the summer (if it doesn’t get blown away in the spring), the upper room will be a lovely study. It’s much taller than we thought."
[225] As surely, however, as he did any work there, so surely his indispensable little accompaniments of work (ii. 226) were carried along with him; and of these I will quote what was written shortly after his death by his son-in-law, Mr. Charles Collins, to illustrate a very touching sketch by Mr. Fildes of his writing-desk and vacant chair. "Ranged in front of, and round about him, were always a variety of objects for his eye to rest on in the intervals of actual writing, and any one of which he would have instantly missed had it been removed. There was a French bronze group representing a duel with swords, fought by a couple of very fat toads, one of them (characterised by that particular buoyancy which belongs to corpulence) in the act of making a prodigious lunge forward, which the other receives in the very middle of his digestive apparatus, and under the influence of which it seems likely that he will satisfy the wounded honour of his opponent by promptly expiring. There was another bronze figure which always stood near the toads, also of French manufacture, and also full of comic suggestion. It was a statuette of a dog-fancier, such a one as you used to see on the bridges or quays of Paris, with a profusion of little dogs stuck under his arms and into his pockets, and everywhere where little dogs could possibly be insinuated, all for sale, and all, as even a casual glance at the vendor's exterior would convince the most unsuspicious person, with some screw loose in their physical constitutions or moral natures, to be discovered immediately after purchase. There was the long gilt leaf with the rabbit sitting erect upon its haunches, the huge paper-knife often held in his hand during his public readings, and the little fresh green cup ornamented with the leaves and blossoms of the cowslip, in which a few fresh flowers were always placed every morning—for Dickens invariably worked with flowers on his writing-table. There was also the register of the day of the week and of the month, which stood always before him; and when the room in the châlet in which he wrote his last paragraph was opened, some time after his death, the first thing to be noticed by those who entered was this register, set at 'Wednesday, June 8'—the day of his seizure." It remains to this day as it was found.
[225] Just as he did any work there, his essential little items for work (ii. 226) always went along with him. To illustrate a very moving sketch by Mr. Fildes of his writing desk and empty chair, I’ll quote what was written shortly after his death by his son-in-law, Mr. Charles Collins. "In front of and around him, there was always a variety of objects for his eyes to rest on during breaks from writing, and he would have quickly noticed if any one of them was missing. There was a French bronze piece showing a duel with swords, fought by two very plump toads, one of them (marked by that buoyancy that comes with being overweight) making a huge lunge forward, which the other receives right in the middle of its belly, and seems likely to die promptly, thus restoring the wounded honor of his opponent. Another bronze figure always stood near the toads, also from France, and full of comic appeal. It was a statuette of a dog-fancier, like those you used to see on the bridges or quays of Paris, with a bunch of little dogs tucked under his arms and stuffed into his pockets, anywhere little dogs could be squeezed in, all for sale, and all, as anyone could tell with just a casual glance at the vendor's appearance, possessing some sort of physical or moral flaw that would become obvious right after the purchase. There was the long gilt leaf with a rabbit sitting upright on its haunches, the huge paper knife he often held during public readings, and the little bright green cup adorned with leaves and blossoms of the cowslip, in which fresh flowers were placed every morning—Dickens always worked with flowers on his writing table. There was also a calendar showing the day of the week and the month, which stood always before him; and when the room in the châlet where he wrote his last paragraph was opened some time after his death, the first thing noticed by those who entered was this calendar set to 'Wednesday, June 8'—the day he had his seizure." It remains just as it was found.
[226] Dickens's interest in dogs (as in the habits and ways of all animals) was inexhaustible, and he welcomed with delight any new trait. The subjoined, told him by a lady friend, was a great acquisition. "I must close" (14th of May 1867) "with an odd story of a Newfoundland dog. An immense black good-humoured Newfoundland dog. He came from Oxford and had lived all his life at a brewery. Instructions were given with him that if he were let out every morning alone, he would immediately find out the river; regularly take a swim; and gravely come home again. This he did with the greatest punctuality, but after a little while was observed to smell of beer. She was so sure that he smelt of beer that she resolved to watch him. Accordingly, he was seen to come back from his swim, round the usual corner, and to go up a flight of steps into a beer-shop. Being instantly followed, the beer-shop-keeper is seen to take down a pot (pewter pot), and is heard to say: 'Well, old chap! Come for your beer as usual, have you?' Upon which he draws a pint and puts it down, and the dog drinks it. Being required to explain how this comes to pass, the man says, 'Yes ma'am. I know he's your dog ma'am, but I didn't when he first come. He looked in ma'am—as a Brickmaker might—and then he come in—as a Brickmaker might—and he wagged his tail at the pots, and he giv' a sniff round, and conveyed to me as he was used to beer. So I draw'd him a drop, and he drunk it up. Next morning he come agen by the clock and I drawed him a pint, and ever since he has took his pint reglar.'"
[226] Dickens had a never-ending fascination with dogs (and the behaviors of all animals) and was always thrilled to learn something new about them. The following story, shared by a female friend, was a fantastic addition. "I have to wrap up" (May 14, 1867) "with a quirky tale about a Newfoundland dog. An enormous, friendly black Newfoundland dog. He came from Oxford and spent his entire life at a brewery. He was given instructions that if he was let out alone every morning, he'd immediately find the river; take a quick swim; and then come home like clockwork. He did this with impressive regularity but after a while, he started to smell like beer. She was so convinced he smelled of beer that she decided to keep an eye on him. Sure enough, he was spotted returning from his swim, turning the usual corner, and going up a flight of steps into a pub. When he was followed, the pub owner was seen taking down a tin cup and heard saying: 'Well, old chap! Back for your beer as usual, are you?' He then poured a pint and set it down, and the dog drank it. When asked to explain how this happened, the man replied, 'Yes ma'am. I know he's your dog, ma'am, but I didn’t know when he first came in. He looked in, ma’am—like a Brickmaker would—and then he came in—like a Brickmaker would—and he wagged his tail at the cups, sniffed around, and made it clear he was used to beer. So I poured him a little, and he drank it. The next morning, he showed up again right on time, and I poured him a pint, and ever since, he’s come for his pint regularly.'"
[227] This was the Carol and Pickwick. "We are reduced sometimes," he adds, "to a ludicrous state of distress by the quantity of silver we have to carry about. Arthur Smith is always accompanied by an immense black leather-bag full." Mr. Smith had an illness a couple of days later, and Dickens whimsically describes his rapid recovery on discovering the state of their balances. "He is now sitting opposite to me on a bag of £40 of silver. It must be dreadfully hard."
[227] This was the Carol and Pickwick. "Sometimes we find ourselves in a ridiculous situation because of all the silver we have to carry around. Arthur Smith always has this huge black leather bag full of it." A couple of days later, Mr. Smith got sick, and Dickens humorously describes how quickly he recovered when he saw how much money they had. "He's now sitting across from me on a bag containing £40 in silver. It must be really uncomfortable."
[228] A letter to his eldest daughter (23rd of Aug.) makes humorous addition. "The man who drove our jaunting car yesterday hadn't a piece in his coat as big as a penny roll, and had had his hat on (apparently without brushing it) ever since he was grown-up. But he was remarkably intelligent and agreeable, with something to say about everything. For instance, when I asked him what a certain building was, he didn't say 'Courts of Law' and nothing else, but 'Av yer plase Sir, its the foor Coorts o' looyers, where Misther O'Connell stood his trial wunst, as ye'll remimbir sir, afore I till ye ov it.' When we got into the Phœnix Park, he looked round him as if it were his own, and said 'That's a Park sir, av ye plase!' I complimented it, and he said 'Gintlemen tills me as they iv bin, sir, over Europe and never see a Park aqualling ov it. Yander's the Vice-regal Lodge, sir; in thim two corners lives the two Sicretaries, wishing I was thim sir. There's air here sir, av yer plase! There's scenery here sir! There's mountains thim sir! Yer coonsider it a Park sir? It is that sir!'"
[228] A letter to his oldest daughter (August 23rd) adds a humorous touch. "The guy who drove our carriage yesterday didn’t have a patch on his coat bigger than a penny roll, and he had apparently worn his hat without brushing it since he grew up. But he was extremely smart and friendly, with something to say about everything. For instance, when I asked him what a certain building was, he didn’t just say 'Courts of Law' and leave it at that; he said, 'If you please, sir, it’s the four Courts of lawyers, where Mr. O'Connell stood his trial once, as you’ll remember, sir, before I tell you about it.' When we got into Phoenix Park, he looked around as if it were his own and said, 'That's a Park, sir, if you please!' I complimented it, and he replied, 'Gentlemen tell me they’ve been all over Europe and have never seen a park that matches it. There's the Vice-regal Lodge, sir; in those two corners live the two Secretaries, wishing I were them, sir. There's fresh air here, sir, if you please! There's scenery here, sir! There are mountains there, sir! You consider this a park, sir? It certainly is, sir!'"
[229] The Irish girls outdid the American (i. 385) in one particular. He wrote to his sister-in-law: "Every night, by the bye, since I have been in Ireland, the ladies have beguiled John out of the bouquet from my coat; and yesterday morning, as I had showered the leaves from my geranium in reading Little Dombey, they mounted the platform after I was gone, and picked them all up as a keepsake." A few days earlier he had written to the same correspondent: "The papers are full of remarks upon my white tie, and describe it as being of enormous size, which is a wonderful delusion; because, as you very well know, it is a small tie. Generally, I am happy to report, the Emerald press is in favour of my appearance, and likes my eyes. But one gentleman comes out with a letter at Cork, wherein he says that although only 46, I look like an old man."
[229] The Irish girls definitely surpassed the Americans (i. 385) in one specific way. He wrote to his sister-in-law: "Every night, by the way, since I arrived in Ireland, the ladies have charmed John out of the bouquet from my coat; and yesterday morning, after I dropped the leaves from my geranium while reading Little Dombey, they went up on the platform after I left and picked them all up as a memento." A few days before, he had written to the same person: "The papers are filled with comments about my white tie, describing it as being enormous, which is quite a misconception; because, as you know very well, it’s a small tie. Generally, I’m happy to report that the Irish press is favorable towards my appearance and appreciates my eyes. But one gentleman in Cork wrote a letter stating that even though I’m only 46, I look like an old man."
[230] "They had offered frantic prices for stalls. Eleven bank-notes were thrust into a paybox at one time for eleven stalls. Our men were flattened against walls and squeezed against beams. Ladies stood all night with their chins against my platform. Other ladies sat all night upon my steps. We turned away people enough to make immense houses for a week." Letter to his eldest daughter.
[230] "They offered outrageous prices for the stalls. Eleven banknotes were shoved into the paybox at once for eleven stalls. Our guys were pushed up against walls and jammed against beams. Women stood all night with their chins resting on my platform. Other women sat on my steps all night. We turned away enough people to fill huge houses for a week." Letter to his eldest daughter.
[231] "Shillings get into stalls, and half-crowns get into shillings, and stalls get nowhere, and there is immense confusion." Letter to his daughter.
[231] "Shillings end up in stalls, and half-crowns turn into shillings, and stalls lead to nowhere, creating a lot of confusion." Letter to his daughter.
[232] "I was brought very near to what I sometimes dream may be my Fame," he says in a letter of later date to myself from York, "when a lady whose face I had never seen stopped me yesterday in the street, and said to me, Mr. Dickens, will you let me touch the hand that has filled my house with many friends." October 1858.
[232] "I got really close to what I sometimes dream could be my Fame," he writes in a later letter to me from York, "when a lady whose face I had never seen stopped me in the street yesterday and said, Mr. Dickens, can I touch the hand that has filled my house with many friends." October 1858.
[233] "That is no doubt immense, our expenses being necessarily large, and the travelling party being always five." Another source of profit was the sale of the copies of the several Readings prepared by himself. "Our people alone sell eight, ten, and twelve dozen a night." A later letter says: "The men with the reading books were sold out, for about the twentieth time, at Manchester. Eleven dozen of the Poor Traveller, Boots, and Gamp being sold in about ten minutes, they had no more left; and Manchester became green with the little tracts, in every bookshop, outside every omnibus, and passing along every street. The sale of them, apart from us, must be very great." "Did I tell you," he writes in another letter, "that the agents for our tickets who are also booksellers, say very generally that the readings decidedly increase the sale of the books they are taken from? We were first told of this by a Mr. Parke, a wealthy old gentleman in a very large way at Wolverhampton, who did all the business for love, and would not take a farthing. Since then, we have constantly come upon it; and M'Glashin and Gill at Dublin were very strong about it indeed."
[233] "That’s definitely a lot, since our expenses are pretty high, and the traveling group is always five people." Another way we made money was by selling copies of the various Readings he prepared himself. "Our folks sell eight, ten, and twelve dozen each night." A later letter mentions: "The guys with the reading books sold out again, for about the twentieth time, in Manchester. Eleven dozen copies of the Poor Traveller, Boots, and Gamp were gone in about ten minutes, and they had no more left; Manchester was flooded with those little pamphlets, in every bookstore, outside every bus, and along every street. The sales of them, apart from us, must be huge." "Did I tell you," he writes in another letter, "that the ticket agents who are also booksellers generally say that the readings definitely boost the sales of the books they come from? We first heard about this from Mr. Parke, a wealthy old gentleman in a big way in Wolverhampton, who did all the business purely for the love of it and wouldn’t accept a penny. Since then, we’ve frequently come across this, and M'Glashin and Gill in Dublin were really vocal about it."
[234] The last of them were given immediately after his completion of the Tale of Two Cities: "I am a little tired; but as little, I suspect, as any man could be with the work of the last four days, and perhaps the change of work was better than subsiding into rest and rust. The Norwich people were a noble audience. There, and at Ipswich and Bury, we had the demonstrativeness of the great working-towns, and a much finer perception."—14th of October 1859.
[234] The last of them were given right after he finished the Tale of Two Cities: "I'm a bit tired, but probably as little as anyone could be after the work of the last four days, and maybe switching up the work was better than just resting and becoming stagnant. The people of Norwich were an amazing audience. There, and in Ipswich and Bury, we experienced the enthusiasm of the great industrial towns, along with a much finer understanding."—October 14, 1859.
[235] Two pleasing little volumes may here be named as devoted to special descriptions of the several Readings; by his friend Mr. Charles Kent in England (Charles Dickens as a Reader), and by Miss Kate Field in America (Pen Photographs).
[235] Two enjoyable little books can be mentioned that focus on specific descriptions of the various Readings: one by his friend Mr. Charles Kent in England (Charles Dickens as a Reader) and the other by Miss Kate Field in America (Pen Photographs).
[236] Let me subjoin his own note of a less important incident of that month which will show his quick and sure eye for any bit of acting out of the common. The lady has since justified its closing prediction. Describing an early dinner with Chauncy Townshend, he adds (17th of December 1858): "I escaped at half-past seven, and went to the Strand Theatre: having taken a stall beforehand, for it is always crammed. I really wish you would go, between this and next Thursday, to see the Maid and the Magpie burlesque there. There is the strangest thing in it that ever I have seen on the stage. The boy, Pippo, by Miss Wilton. While it is astonishingly impudent (must be, or it couldn't be done at all), it is so stupendously like a boy, and unlike a woman, that it is perfectly free from offence. I never have seen such a thing. Priscilla Horton, as a boy, not to be thought of beside it. She does an imitation of the dancing of the Christy Minstrels—wonderfully clever—which, in the audacity of its thorough-going, is surprising. A thing that you can not imagine a woman's doing at all; and yet the manner, the appearance, the levity, impulse, and spirits of it, are so exactly like a boy that you cannot think of anything like her sex in association with it. It begins at 8, and is over by a quarter-past 9. I never have seen such a curious thing, and the girl's talent is unchallengeable. I call her the cleverest girl I have ever seen on the stage in my time, and the most singularly original."
[236] Let me add his own note about a less significant event from that month which shows his keen eye for anything out of the ordinary. The lady has since validated its closing prediction. Describing an early dinner with Chauncy Townshend, he adds (December 17, 1858): "I left at half-past seven and went to the Strand Theatre: I had bought a stall in advance because it’s always packed. I really wish you would go before next Thursday to see the Maid and the Magpie burlesque there. There’s the strangest thing in it I’ve ever seen on stage. The boy, Pippo, played by Miss Wilton. While it’s incredibly bold (it has to be, or it wouldn’t work at all), it is so astonishingly boyish and not at all like a woman that it’s completely inoffensive. I’ve never seen anything like it. Priscilla Horton, as a boy, doesn't compare at all. She does a remarkable imitation of the dancing of the Christy Minstrels—wonderfully clever—which, in its sheer audacity, is surprising. It’s something you cannot imagine a woman doing at all; and yet the style, appearance, energy, impulse, and spirit of it are so exactly boy-like that you can't associate anything about her gender with it. It starts at 8 and is over by a quarter-past 9. I’ve never seen such a curious thing, and the girl’s talent is undeniable. I call her the most talented girl I’ve ever seen on stage in my lifetime, and the most uniquely original."
[238] From the same letter, dated 1st of July 1861, I take what follows. "Poor Lord Campbell's seems to me as easy and good a death as one could desire. There must be a sweep of these men very soon, and one feels as if it must fall out like the breaking of an arch—one stone goes from a prominent place, and then the rest begin to drop. So, one looks, not without satisfaction (in our sadness) at lives so rounded and complete, towards Brougham, and Lyndhurst, and Pollock" . . . Yet, of Dickens's own death, Pollock lived to write to me as the death of "one of the most distinguished and honoured men England has ever produced; in whose loss every man among us feels that he has lost a friend and an instructor." Temple-Hatton, 10th of June 1870.
[238] From the same letter, dated July 1, 1861, I take what follows. "Poor Lord Campbell's death seems to me as peaceful and dignified as one could hope for. There must be a wave of these men going soon, and it feels like it’ll happen like the collapse of an arch—one stone falls from a crucial spot, and then the rest begin to tumble. So, one looks, not without some satisfaction (amid our sadness), at lives so well-rounded and complete, towards Brougham, Lyndhurst, and Pollock" . . . Yet, regarding Dickens's own death, Pollock wrote to me, calling it the death of "one of the most distinguished and respected men England has ever produced; whose loss makes every man among us feel as if he has lost a friend and a guide." Temple-Hatton, June 10, 1870.
[239] If space were available here, his letters would supply many proofs of his interest in Mr. George Moore's admirable projects; but I can only make exception for his characteristic allusion to an incident that tickled his fancy very much at the time. "I hope" (20th of Aug. 1863) "you have been as much amused as I am by the account of the Bishop of Carlisle at (my very particular friend's) Mr. George Moore's schools? It strikes me as the funniest piece of weakness I ever saw, his addressing those unfortunate children concerning Colenso. I cannot get over the ridiculous image I have erected in my mind, of the shovel-hat and apron holding forth, at that safe distance, to that safe audience. There is nothing so extravagant in Rabelais, or so satirically humorous in Swift or Voltaire."
[239] If there were more space here, his letters would provide plenty of evidence of his interest in Mr. George Moore's excellent projects; however, I can only highlight his amusing reference to an incident that really entertained him at the time. "I hope" (August 20, 1863) "you have found the account of the Bishop of Carlisle at (my very good friend) Mr. George Moore's schools as amusing as I have? It seems to me the most absurd display of weakness I've ever seen, him speaking to those poor children about Colenso. I can't shake the ridiculous image I've created in my mind of the shovel-hat and apron lecturing from a safe distance to that secure audience. There's nothing as outrageous in Rabelais or as satirically humorous in Swift or Voltaire."
[240] Eight years later he wrote "Holiday Romance" for a Child's Magazine published by Mr. Fields, and "George Silverman's Explanation"—of the same length, and for the same price. There are no other such instances, I suppose, in the history of literature.
[240] Eight years later, he wrote "Holiday Romance" for a children's magazine published by Mr. Fields, along with "George Silverman's Explanation"—both the same length and priced the same. I guess there are no other examples like this in literary history.
[241] "You will be grieved," he wrote (Saturday 19th of Nov. 1859) "to hear of poor Stone. On Sunday he was not well. On Monday, went to Dr. Todd, who told him he had aneurism of the heart. On Tuesday, went to Dr. Walsh, who told him he hadn't. On Wednesday I met him in a cab in the Square here, and he got out to talk to me. I walked about with him a little while at a snail's pace, cheering him up; but when I came home, I told them that I thought him much changed, and in danger. Yesterday at 2 o'clock he died of spasm of the heart. I am going up to Highgate to look for a grave for him."
[241] "You’re going to be upset," he wrote (Saturday, November 19, 1859). "to hear about poor Stone. On Sunday, he wasn’t feeling well. On Monday, he saw Dr. Todd, who told him he had an aneurysm of the heart. On Tuesday, he saw Dr. Walsh, who said he didn’t. On Wednesday, I ran into him in a cab in the Square, and he got out to talk to me. I walked around with him for a bit at a slow pace, trying to cheer him up; but when I got home, I told them that I thought he seemed much changed and in danger. Yesterday at 2 PM, he died of a heart spasm. I’m going up to Highgate to find a grave for him."
[242] He was now hard at work on his story; and a note written from Gadshill after the funeral shows, what so frequently was incident to his pursuits, the hard conditions under which sorrow, and its claim on his exertion, often came to him. "To-morrow I have to work against time and tide and everything else, to fill up a No. keeping open for me, and the stereotype plates of which must go to America on Friday. But indeed the enquiry into poor Alfred's affairs; the necessity of putting the widow and children somewhere; the difficulty of knowing what to do for the best; and the need I feel under of being as composed and deliberate as I can be, and yet of not shirking or putting off the occasion that there is for doing a duty; would have brought me back here to be quiet, under any circumstances."
[242] He was now deeply focused on his story; and a note written from Gadshill after the funeral reveals, as often happened in his career, the tough circumstances under which grief and its demands on his effort frequently confronted him. "Tomorrow I have to race against time and everything else to complete a piece, keeping a spot open for me, and the stereotype plates of which must be sent to America on Friday. But honestly, looking into poor Alfred's situation; needing to find a place for the widow and children; struggling to figure out what to do that's best; and feeling the pressure to remain as calm and deliberate as possible yet not avoiding or delaying the duty at hand; would have brought me back here to find some peace, no matter the circumstances."
[243] The same letter adds: "The fourth edition of Great Expectations is now going to press; the third being nearly out. Bulwer's story keeps us up bravely. As well as we can make out, we have even risen fifteen hundred."
[243] The same letter adds: "The fourth edition of Great Expectations is now going to print; the third is almost sold out. Bulwer's story keeps us going strong. As far as we can tell, we've even increased by fifteen hundred."
[244] "There was a very touching thing in the Chapel" (at Brompton). "When the body was to be taken up and carried to the grave, there stepped out, instead of the undertaker's men with their hideous paraphernalia, the men who had always been with the two brothers at the Egyptian Hall; and they, in their plain, decent, own mourning clothes, carried the poor fellow away. Also, standing about among the gravestones, dressed in black, I noticed every kind of person who had ever had to do with him—from our own gas man and doorkeepers and billstickers, up to Johnson the printer and that class of man. The father and Albert and he now lie together, and the grave, I suppose, will be no more disturbed I wrote a little inscription for the stone, and it is quite full."
[244] "There was something very moving in the Chapel" (at Brompton). "When it was time to carry the body to the grave, instead of the undertaker's men with their grim equipment, the men who had always been with the two brothers at the Egyptian Hall stepped forward. Dressed in their simple, respectful mourning clothes, they carried the poor guy away. Also, scattered among the gravestones, I noticed all sorts of people who had ever been involved with him— from our gas man and doorkeepers to billstickers, all the way up to Johnson the printer and his crew. The father, Albert, and he now lie together, and I guess the grave will be undisturbed from now on. I wrote a little inscription for the stone, and it's quite complete."
[245] Of his former manager he writes in the same letter: "I miss him dreadfully. The sense I used to have of compactness and comfort about me while I was reading, is quite gone; and on my coming out for the ten minutes, when I used to find him always ready for me with something cheerful to say, it is forlorn. . . . Besides which, H. and all the rest of them are always somewhere, and he was always everywhere."
[245] In the same letter, he writes about his former manager: "I miss him so much. The feeling of closeness and comfort I had while reading is completely gone; and when I step outside for the ten minutes, where I used to find him always ready with something positive to say, it feels empty. . . . Plus, H. and everyone else are always off somewhere, while he was always present."
[246] The more detailed account of the scene which he wrote to his daughter is also well worth giving. "A most tremendous hall here last night. Something almost terrible in the cram. A fearful thing might have happened. Suddenly, when they were all very still over Smike, my Gas Batten came down, and it looked as if the room were falling. There were three great galleries crammed to the roof, and a high steep flight of stairs; and a panic must have destroyed numbers of people. A lady in the front row of stalls screamed, and ran out wildly towards me, and for one instant there was a terrible wave in the crowd. I addressed that lady, laughing (for I knew she was in sight of everybody there), and called out as if it happened every night—'There's nothing the matter I assure you; don't be alarmed; pray sit down——' and she sat down directly, and there was a thunder of applause. It took some five minutes to mend, and I looked on with my hands in my pockets; for I think if I had turned my back for a moment, there might still have been a move. My people were dreadfully alarmed—Boycott" (the gas-man) "in particular, who I suppose had some notion that the whole place might have taken fire—'but there stood the master,' he did me the honour to say afterwards, in addressing the rest, 'as cool as ever I see him a lounging at a Railway Station.'"
[246] The more detailed account of the scene that he wrote to his daughter is also worth sharing. "There was a huge hall here last night. Something almost terrifying about the crowd. A disaster could have happened. Suddenly, when everyone was very quiet around Smike, my gaslight fell, and it felt like the room was collapsing. There were three massive balconies packed to the ceiling, and a steep flight of stairs; panic could have caused chaos for many people. A woman in the front row screamed and ran wildly toward me, and for a moment, there was a terrifying surge in the audience. I addressed that woman, laughing (since I knew she was visible to everyone there), and called out as if this happened every night—'There's nothing wrong, I assure you; don’t be alarmed; please sit down——' and she sat down immediately, followed by a thunderous applause. It took about five minutes to fix, and I watched with my hands in my pockets; I thought if I turned my back for even a second, there might still have been chaos. My team was incredibly worried—Boycott" (the gas man) "especially, who I suppose thought the whole place might catch fire—'but there stood the master,' he honored me by saying later while addressing the others, 'as calm as ever I see him lounging at a train station.'"
[247] The letter referred also to the death of his American friend Professor Felton. "Your mention of poor Felton's death is a shock of surprise as well as grief to me, for I had not heard a word about it. Mr. Fields told me when he was here that the effect of that hotel disaster of bad drinking water had not passed away; so I suppose, as you do, that he sank under it. Poor dear Felton! It is 20 years since I told you of the delight my first knowledge of him gave me, and it is as strongly upon me to this hour. I wish our ways had crossed a little oftener, but that would not have made it better for us now. Alas! alas! all ways have the same finger-post at the head of them, and at every turning in them."
[247] The letter also mentioned the death of his American friend Professor Felton. "I’m shocked and saddened to hear about poor Felton's passing, as I hadn’t heard anything about it. Mr. Fields mentioned when he visited that the effects of that hotel disaster with the tainted water hadn’t gone away; so I guess, like you, that he succumbed to it. Poor dear Felton! It’s been 20 years since I told you how much joy my first encounter with him brought me, and that feeling still resonates with me today. I wish our paths had crossed more often, but I don’t suppose it would have changed anything for us now. Alas! alas! every path leads to the same destination, at every fork in the road."
[248] I give the letter in which he put the scheme formally before me, after the renewed and larger offers had been submitted. "If there were reasonable hope and promise, I could make up my mind to go to Australia and get money. I would not accept the Australian people's offer. I would take no money from them; would bind myself to nothing with them; but would merely make them my agents at such and such a per centage, and go and read there. I would take some man of literary pretensions as a secretary (Charles Collins? What think you?) and with his aid" (he afterwards made the proposal to his old friend Mr. Thomas Beard) "would do, for All the Year Round while I was away, The Uncommercial Traveller Upside Down. If the notion of these speculators be anything like accurate, I should come back rich. I should have seen a great deal of novelty to boot. I should have been very miserable too. . . . Of course one cannot possibly count upon the money to be realized by a six months' absence, but, £12,000 is supposed to be a low estimate. Mr. S. brought me letters from members of the legislature, newspaper editors, and the like, exhorting me to come, saying how much the people talk of me, and dwelling on the kind of reception that would await me. No doubt this is so, and of course a great deal of curious experience for after use would be gained over and above the money. Being my own master too, I could 'work' myself more delicately than if I bound myself for money beforehand. A few years hence, if all other circumstances were the same, I might not be so well fitted for the excessive wear and tear. This is about the whole case. But pray do not suppose that I am in my own mind favourable to going, or that I have any fancy for going." That was late in October. From Paris in November (1862), he wrote: "I mentioned the question to Bulwer when he dined with us here last Sunday, and he was all for going. He said that not only did he think the whole population would go to the Readings, but that the country would strike me in some quite new aspect for a Book; and that wonders might be done with such book in the way of profit, over there as well as here."
[248] I’m sharing the letter in which he formally presented the scheme to me after receiving the updated and larger offers. "If there were a reasonable hope and promise, I could decide to go to Australia and make money. I wouldn’t accept the Australian people's offer. I wouldn’t take any money from them; I wouldn’t commit to anything with them; I would simply have them as my agents at a certain percentage and would go and perform there. I’d bring someone with literary credentials as my secretary (Charles Collins? What do you think?), and with his help" (he later proposed this to his old friend Mr. Thomas Beard) "I would create, for All the Year Round while I was away, The Uncommercial Traveller Upside Down. If these speculators’ idea is anywhere near accurate, I should return wealthy. I’d have experienced a lot of new things as well. I’d likely be very unhappy too. . . . Of course, you can’t really count on the money to be made from a six-month absence, but £12,000 is thought to be a low estimate. Mr. S. brought me letters from some legislators, newspaper editors, and others, urging me to come, mentioning how much people talk about me and highlighting the kind of welcome I would receive. This is probably true, and I could gain a lot of interesting experiences beyond just the money. Being my own boss, I could manage my work more subtly than if I committed to money upfront. A few years from now, if everything else stayed the same, I might not be up for the intense wear and tear. That’s pretty much the whole situation. But please don’t think that I’m inclined to go or that I’m eager to do so." That was late in October. From Paris in November (1862), he wrote: "I brought up the question to Bulwer when he had dinner with us last Sunday, and he was all for going. He said not only did he believe the entire population would attend the Readings, but that the country would offer me a completely new perspective for a book; and that incredible things could be done with such a book in terms of profit, both there and here."
[249] A person present thus described (1st of February 1863) the second night to Miss Dickens. "No one can imagine the scene of last Friday night at the Embassy . . . a two hours' storm of excitement and pleasure. They actually murmured and applauded right away into their carriages and down the street."
[249] A person present thus described (1st of February 1863) the second night to Miss Dickens. "No one can imagine the scene last Friday night at the Embassy... a two-hour storm of excitement and enjoyment. They actually cheered and clapped all the way to their cars and down the street."
[250] From the same authority proceeded, in answer to a casual question one day, a description of the condition of his wardrobe of which he has also made note in the Memoranda. "Well, sir, your clothes is all shabby, and your boots is all burst."
[250] From the same source, in response to a casual question one day, came a description of the state of his wardrobe, which he also recorded in the Memoranda. "Well, sir, your clothes are all worn out, and your boots are all torn."
[251] The date when this fancy dropped into his Memoranda is fixed by the following passage in a letter to me of the 25th of August 1862. "I am trying to coerce my thoughts into hammering out the Christmas number. And I have an idea of opening a book (not the Christmas number—a book) by bringing together two strongly contrasted places and two strongly contrasted sets of people, with which and with whom the story is to rest, through the agency of an electric message. I think a fine thing might be made of the message itself shooting over the land and under the sea, and it would be a curious way of sounding the key note."
[251] The date when this idea entered his notes is marked by the following excerpt from a letter he sent me on August 25, 1862. "I’m working on getting my thoughts in order to write the Christmas edition. I have this concept for starting a book (not the Christmas edition—a book) by bringing together two very different locations and two very different groups of people, using an electric message as the connection. I think it could be really cool to have the message traveling across the land and under the sea, and it would be an interesting way to set the tone."
[252] Following this in the "Memoranda" is an advertisement cut from the Times: of a kind that always expressed to Dickens a child-farming that deserved the gallows quite as much as the worst kind of starving, by way of farming, babies. The fourteen guineas a-year, "tender" age of the "dear" ones, maternal care, and no vacations or extras, to him had only one meaning.
[252] Following this in the "Memoranda" is an advertisement clipped from the Times: of a type that always made Dickens think of a child-farming operation that was just as deserving of the gallows as the worst form of starving, by way of farming, babies. The fourteen guineas a year, the "tender" age of the "dear" ones, maternal care, and no vacations or extras had only one meaning to him.
[253] There had been some estrangement between them since the autumn of 1858, hardly now worth mention even in a note. Thackeray, justly indignant at a published description of himself by the member of a club to which both he and Dickens belonged, referred it to the Committee, who decided to expel the writer. Dickens, thinking expulsion too harsh a penalty for an offence thoughtlessly given, and, as far as might be, manfully atoned for by withdrawal and regret, interposed to avert that extremity. Thackeray resented the interference, and Dickens was justly hurt by the manner in which he did so. Neither was wholly right, nor was either altogether in the wrong.
[253] There had been some distance between them since the fall of 1858, hardly worth mentioning even in a note. Thackeray, justifiably angry about a published description of himself by a member of a club to which both he and Dickens belonged, brought it to the Committee, who decided to expel the writer. Dickens, believing that expulsion was too harsh for a thoughtless offense that had been partially atoned for with withdrawal and regret, stepped in to prevent that extreme action. Thackeray resented the interference, and Dickens was justifiably hurt by how he reacted. Neither was completely right, nor was either entirely wrong.
[254] As I have thus fallen on theatrical subjects, I may add one or two practical experiences which befell Dickens at theatres in the autumn of 1864, when he sallied forth from his office upon these night wanderings to "cool" a boiling head. "I went the other night" (8th of October) "to see the Streets of London at the Princess's. A piece that is really drawing all the town, and filling the house with nightly overflows. It is the most depressing instance, without exception, of an utterly degraded and debased theatrical taste that has ever come under my writhing notice. For not only do the audiences—of all classes—go, but they are unquestionably delighted. At Astley's there has been much puffing at great cost of a certain Miss Ada Isaacs Menkin, who is to be seen bound on the horse in Mazeppa 'ascending the fearful precipices not as hitherto done by a dummy.' Last night, having a boiling head, I went out from here to cool myself on Waterloo Bridge, and I thought I would go and see this heroine. Applied at the box-door for a stall. 'None left sir.' For a box-ticket. 'Only standing-room sir.' Then the man (busy in counting great heaps of veritable checks) recognizes me and says—'Mr. Smith will be very much concerned when he hears that you went away sir'—'Never mind; I'll come again.' 'You never go behind I think sir, or—?' 'No thank you, I never go behind.' 'Mr. Smith's box, sir—' 'No thank you, I'll come again.' Now who do you think the lady is? If you don't already know, ask that question of the highest Irish mountains that look eternal, and they'll never tell you—Mrs. Heenan!" This lady, who turned out to be one of Dickens's greatest admirers, addressed him at great length on hearing of this occurrence, and afterwards dedicated a volume of poems to him! There was a pleasanter close to his letter. "Contrariwise I assisted another night at the Adelphi (where I couldn't, with careful calculation, get the house up to Nine Pounds), and saw quite an admirable performance of Mr. Toole and Mrs. Mellon—she, an old servant, wonderfully like Anne—he, showing a power of passion very unusual indeed in a comic actor, as such things go, and of a quite remarkable kind."
[254] Since I’m talking about theater topics, I’ll share a couple of experiences that Dickens had at theaters in the fall of 1864 when he went out at night to "cool" his boiling head. "The other night" (October 8th), "I went to see the Streets of London at the Princess's. It's a show that's really attracting everyone in town and is selling out every night. It’s the most depressing example, by far, of a completely degraded and debased taste in theater that I’ve ever witnessed. Not only do audiences—of all backgrounds—attend, but they are undeniably thrilled. At Astley’s, there has been a lot of publicizing at great expense of a certain Miss Ada Isaacs Menkin, who performs on a horse in Mazeppa, climbing the terrifying cliffs in a way that’s never been done before, without using a dummy.' Last night, feeling frustrated, I went out to cool off on Waterloo Bridge, and decided to check out this heroine. I asked at the box office for a stall. 'None left, sir.' For a box ticket. 'Only standing room, sir.' Then the man (busy counting stacks of real tickets) recognized me and said, 'Mr. Smith will be very concerned when he hears you left, sir.' 'No worries; I’ll come back.' 'You never go backstage, do you, sir?' 'No thanks, I never go backstage.' 'Mr. Smith's box, sir—' 'No thanks, I’ll come back.' Now, guess who the lady is? If you don’t already know, just ask the highest Irish mountains that seem eternal, and they won’t tell you—Mrs. Heenan!" This woman, who turned out to be one of Dickens’s biggest fans, spoke to him at length when she heard about this, and later dedicated a book of poems to him! There was a nicer ending to his letter. "In contrast, I attended another night at the Adelphi (where I couldn't, after careful calculation, get the box office up to Nine Pounds), and saw quite an impressive performance by Mr. Toole and Mrs. Mellon—she was an old servant, remarkably similar to Anne—he showed a level of passion that’s quite rare in a comic actor, as things usually go, and it was really extraordinary."
[255] Writing to me three months before, he spoke of the death of one whom he had known from his boyhood (ante, i. 47-8) and with whom he had fought unsuccessfully for some years against the management of the Literary Fund. "Poor Dilke! I am very sorry that the capital old stout-hearted man is dead." Sorrow may also be expressed that no adequate record should remain of a career which for steadfast purpose, conscientious maintenance of opinion, and pursuit of public objects with disregard of self, was one of very high example. So averse was Mr. Dilke to every kind of display that his name appears to none of the literary investigations which were conducted by him with an acuteness wonderful as his industry, and it was in accordance with his express instructions that the literary journal which his energy and self-denial had established kept silence respecting him at his death.
[255] Three months ago, he wrote to me about the death of someone he had known since childhood (ante, i. 47-8). They had fought unsuccessfully for several years against the management of the Literary Fund. "Poor Dilke! I'm really sorry that the brave old man has passed away." It’s also sad that no thorough record remains of a career that exemplified steadfast dedication, unwavering opinions, and a commitment to public causes above personal gain. Mr. Dilke disliked any kind of attention so much that his name isn't mentioned in any of the literary studies he conducted with impressive insight and diligence. It was according to his specific wishes that the literary journal he founded with his hard work and selflessness stayed silent about him after his death.
[257] Here are allusions to it at that time. "I have got a boot on to-day,—made on an Otranto scale, but really not very discernible from its ordinary sized companion." After a few days' holiday: "I began to feel my foot stronger the moment I breathed the sea air. Still, during the ten days I have been away, I have never been able to wear a boot after four or five in the afternoon, but have passed all the evenings with the foot up, and nothing on it. I am burnt brown and have walked by the sea perpetually, yet I feel certain that if I wore a boot this evening, I should be taken with those torments again before the night was out." This last letter ended thus: "As a relief to my late dismal letters, I send you the newest American story. Backwoods Doctor is called in to the little boy of a woman-settler. Stares at the child some time through a pair of spectacles. Ultimately takes them off, and says to the mother: 'Wa'al Marm, this is small-pox. 'Tis Marm, small-pox. But I am not posted up in Pustuls, and I do not know as I could bring him along slick through it. But I'll tell you wa'at I can do Marm:—I can send him a draft as will certainly put him into a most etarnal Fit, and I am almighty smart at Fits, and we might git round Old Grisly that way.'"
[257] Here are references to it at that time. "I have a boot on today—made on an Otranto scale, but honestly not that distinguishable from its regular-sized counterpart." After a few days off: "I started to feel my foot stronger the moment I breathed in the sea air. Still, during the ten days I’ve been away, I’ve never been able to wear a boot after four or five in the afternoon, but I spent all the evenings with my foot up, and nothing on it. I’m sunburned and have walked by the sea constantly, yet I’m sure that if I put on a boot this evening, I would be hit with that pain again before the night is over." This last letter concluded with: "As a break from my recent gloomy letters, I’m sending you the latest American story. A backwoods doctor is called in to see the little boy of a woman settler. He stares at the child for a while through a pair of glasses. Eventually, he takes them off and says to the mother: ‘Well, ma'am, this is smallpox. It is, ma'am, smallpox. But I’m not familiar with pustules, and I don’t know if I could get him through it easily. But I’ll tell you what I can do, ma'am: I can send him a draft that will definitely put him in a very eternal fit, and I’m really good at fits, and we might get around Old Grizzly that way.’"
[258] I give one such instance: "The railway people have offered, in the case of the young man whom I got out of the carriage just alive, all the expenses and a thousand pounds down. The father declines to accept the offer. It seems unlikely that the young man, whose destination is India, would ever be passed for the Army now by the Medical Board. The question is, how far will that contingency tell, under Lord Campbell's Act?"
[258] Here's an example: "The railway representatives have offered to cover all expenses and provide a thousand pounds upfront for the young man I helped out of the carriage, barely alive. The father has chosen not to accept the offer. It seems unlikely that the young man, who is heading to India, would be approved for the Army by the Medical Board at this point. The question is, how much will that possibility matter under Lord Campbell's Act?"
[259] He wrote to me on the 15th of March from Dublin: "So profoundly discouraging were the accounts from here in London last Tuesday that I held several councils with Chappell about coming at all; had actually drawn up a bill announcing (indefinitely) the postponement of the readings; and had meant to give him a reading to cover the charges incurred—but yielded at last to his representations the other way. We ran through a snow storm nearly the whole way, and in Wales got snowed up, came to a stoppage, and had to dig the engine out. . . . We got to Dublin at last, found it snowing and raining, and heard that it had been snowing and raining since the first day of the year. . . . As to outward signs of trouble or preparation, they are very few. At Kingstown our boat was waited for by four armed policemen, and some stragglers in various dresses who were clearly detectives. But there was no show of soldiery. My people carry a long heavy box containing gas-fittings. This was immediately laid hold of; but one of the stragglers instantly interposed on seeing my name, and came to me in the carriage and apologised. . . . The worst looking young fellow I ever saw, turned up at Holyhead before we went to bed there, and sat glooming and glowering by the coffee-room fire while we warmed ourselves. He said he had been snowed up with us (which we didn't believe), and was horribly disconcerted by some box of his having gone to Dublin without him. We said to one another 'Fenian:' and certainly he disappeared in the morning, and let his box go where it would." What Dickens heard and saw in Dublin, during this visit, convinced him that Fenianism and disaffection had found their way into several regiments.
[259] He wrote to me on March 15th from Dublin: "The news from London last Tuesday was so discouraging that I had several meetings with Chappell about whether to come at all; I even drafted a statement indefinitely postponing the readings and planned to give him a reading to cover the costs incurred—but ultimately I gave in to his arguments otherwise. We traveled through a snowstorm almost the entire way and got stuck in Wales, having to dig the engine out. . . . We finally arrived in Dublin, where it was both snowing and raining, and we learned that it had been doing so since the first day of the year. . . . As for visible signs of trouble or preparation, there were very few. At Kingstown, four armed police waited for our boat, along with some people dressed in various outfits who were clearly detectives. But there was no sign of soldiers. My people had a long, heavy box filled with gas fittings. This was immediately seized, but one of the detectives quickly intervened upon seeing my name and apologized to me in the carriage. . . . The worst-looking young man I’ve ever seen showed up at Holyhead before we went to bed there, sulking by the coffee-room fire while we warmed ourselves. He claimed he had been stuck with us (which we didn’t believe) and was really upset because some box of his had gone to Dublin without him. We looked at each other and thought 'Fenian:' and sure enough, he disappeared in the morning, letting his box go wherever it wanted." What Dickens witnessed and heard in Dublin during this visit made him believe that Fenianism and discontent had infiltrated several regiments.
[260] This renders it worth preservation in a note. He called it
[260] This makes it worth keeping in a note. He referred to it as
[261] I hope my readers will find themselves able to understand that, as well as this which follows: "What seems preposterous, impossible to us, seemed to him simple fact of observation. When he imagined a street, a house, a room, a figure, he saw it not in the vague schematic way of ordinary imagination, but in the sharp definition of actual perception, all the salient details obtruding themselves on his attention. He, seeing it thus vividly, made us also see it; and believing in its reality however fantastic, he communicated something of his belief to us. He presented it in such relief that we ceased to think of it as a picture. So definite and insistent was the image, that even while knowing it was false we could not help, for a moment, being affected, as it were, by his hallucination."
[261] I hope my readers can grasp this, along with what follows: "What seems ridiculous and impossible to us seemed to him like straightforward observation. When he envisioned a street, a house, a room, a figure, he didn't see it in the unclear, basic way most people do; instead, he perceived it with the clarity of actual experience, with all the striking details demanding his attention. By seeing it so vividly, he made us see it too; and even though we knew it was fantastical, he passed on a bit of his belief in its reality to us. He presented it so clearly that we stopped thinking of it as just a picture. The image was so definite and persistent that even while we understood it was untrue, we couldn't help but feel, for a moment, influenced by his illusion."
[262] "Though," John Ballantyne told Lockhart, "he often turned himself on his pillow with a groan of torment, he usually continued the sentence in the same breath. But when dialogue of peculiar animation was in progress, spirit seemed to triumph altogether over matter—he arose from his couch and walked up and down the room, raising and lowering his voice, and as it were acting the parts." Lockhart, vi. 67-8. The statement of James Ballantyne is at p. 89 of the same volume. The original incidents on which Scott had founded the tale he remembered, but "not a single character woven by the romancer, not one of the many scenes and points of humour, nor anything with which he was connected as the writer of the work."
[262] "Even though," John Ballantyne told Lockhart, "he often turned on his pillow with a groan of distress, he usually kept going with the sentence in the same breath. But when there was a particularly lively dialogue happening, his spirit seemed to completely overcome his physical discomfort—he got up from his couch and walked back and forth in the room, raising and lowering his voice, as if he were performing the parts." Lockhart, vi. 67-8. James Ballantyne's statement is on p. 89 of the same volume. He remembered the original incidents that inspired Scott's story, but "not a single character created by the storyteller, not one of the numerous scenes or moments of humor, nor anything connected to him as the writer of the work."
[263] "Do you know Master Humphrey's Clock! I admire Nell in the Old Curiosity Shop exceedingly. The whole thing is a good deal borrowed from Wilhelm Meister. But little Nell is a far purer, lovelier, more English conception than Mignon, treasonable as the saying would seem to some. No doubt it was suggested by Mignon."—Sara Coleridge to Aubrey de Vere (Memoirs and Letters, ii. 269-70). Expressing no opinion on this comparison, I may state it as within my knowledge that the book referred to was not then known to Dickens.
[263] "Have you read Master Humphrey's Clock! I really admire Nell in the Old Curiosity Shop. The whole story takes quite a bit from Wilhelm Meister. But little Nell is a much purer, more beautiful, and more English idea than Mignon, as controversial as that might sound to some. It was likely inspired by Mignon."—Sara Coleridge to Aubrey de Vere (Memoirs and Letters, ii. 269-70). Without sharing my thoughts on this comparison, I can say from what I know that Dickens was not familiar with the book being mentioned at that time.
[264] The distinction I then pointed out was remarked by Sara Coleridge (Memoirs and Letters, ii. 169) in writing of her children. "They like to talk to me . . . above all about the productions of Dickens, the never-to-be-exhausted fun of Pickwick, and the capital new strokes of Martin Chuzzlewit. This last work contains, besides all the fun, some very marked and available morals. I scarce know any book in which the evil and odiousness of selfishness are more forcibly brought out, or in a greater variety of exhibitions. In the midst of the merry quotations, or at least on any fair opportunity, I draw the boys' attention to these points."
[264] The distinction I pointed out was noted by Sara Coleridge (Memoirs and Letters, ii. 169) when she wrote about her kids. "They like to chat with me . . . especially about the works of Dickens, the endlessly entertaining Pickwick, and the great new elements of Martin Chuzzlewit. This last book has, in addition to all the fun, some very clear and useful morals. I hardly know any book that illustrates the evil and disgusting nature of selfishness more powerfully or in such a variety of ways. Amid the humorous quotes, or whenever there's a good chance, I point these things out to the boys."
[265] All the remarks in my text had been some time in type when Lord Lytton sent me what follows, from one of his father's manuscript (and unpublished) note-books. Substantially it agrees with what I have said; and such unconscious testimony of a brother novelist of so high a rank, careful in the study of his art, is of special value. "The greatest masters of the novel of modern manners have generally availed themselves of Humour for the illustration of manners; and have, with a deep and true, but perhaps unconscious, knowledge of art, pushed the humour almost to the verge of caricature. For, as the serious ideal requires a certain exaggeration in the proportions of the natural, so also does the ludicrous. Thus Aristophanes, in painting the humours of his time, resorts to the most poetical extravagance of machinery, and calls the Clouds in aid of his ridicule of philosophy, or summons Frogs and Gods to unite in his satire on Euripides. The Don Quixote of Cervantes never lived, nor, despite the vulgar belief, ever could have lived, in Spain; but the art of the portrait is in the admirable exaltation of the humorous by means of the exaggerated. With more or less qualification, the same may be said of Parson Adams, of Sir Roger de Coverley, and even of the Vicar of Wakefield. . . . It follows therefore that art and correctness are far from identical, and that the one is sometimes proved by the disdain of the other. For the ideal, whether humorous or serious, does not consist in the imitation but in the exaltation of nature. And we must accordingly enquire of art, not how far it resembles what we have seen, so much as how far it embodies what we can imagine."
[265] All the comments in my text had been typeset for a while when Lord Lytton sent me the following excerpt from one of his father's unpublished notebooks. It largely aligns with what I've written; such unintentional support from a fellow novelist of such high caliber, who is meticulous in the study of his craft, is particularly valuable. "The greatest masters of the contemporary novel generally use humor to illustrate social behaviors, and with a profound and authentic, yet possibly unconscious, understanding of their art, they often push humor to the brink of caricature. Just as a serious ideal requires some exaggeration in the representation of the natural, so does the ridiculous. For instance, Aristophanes, in depicting the absurdities of his time, resorts to the most extravagant poetic devices, summoning the Clouds to mock philosophy or bringing Frogs and Gods together in his satire of Euripides. Cervantes' Don Quixote never existed, nor, despite popular belief, could he have lived in Spain; yet the art of the portrait lies in the remarkable elevation of the humorous through exaggeration. The same can be said, with some qualifications, about Parson Adams, Sir Roger de Coverley, and even the Vicar of Wakefield. Therefore, it follows that art and accuracy are far from the same, and sometimes one is demonstrated by the other’s neglect. The ideal, whether humorous or serious, is not about mimicry but about the elevation of nature. Thus, we should question art not on how closely it resembles what we've experienced, but rather on how well it captures what we can envision."
[266] I cannot refuse myself the satisfaction of quoting, from the best criticism of Dickens I have seen since his death, remarks very pertinent to what is said in my text. "Dickens possessed an imagination unsurpassed, not only in vividness, but in swiftness. I have intentionally avoided all needless comparisons of his works with those of other writers of his time, some of whom have gone before him to their rest, while others survive to gladden the darkness and relieve the monotony of our daily life. But in the power of his imagination—of this I am convinced—he surpassed them, one and all. That imagination could call up at will those associations which, could we but summon them in their full number, would bind together the human family, and make that expression no longer a name, but a living reality. . . . Such associations sympathy alone can warm into life, and imagination alone can at times discern. The great humourist reveals them to every one of us; and his genius is indeed an inspiration from no human source, in that it enables him to render this service to the brotherhood of mankind. But more than this. So marvellously has this earth become the inheritance of mankind, that there is not a thing upon it, animate or inanimate, with which, or with the likeness of which, man's mind has not come into contact; . . . with which human feelings, aspirations, thoughts, have not acquired an endless variety of single or subtle associations. . . . These also, which we imperfectly divine or carelessly pass by, the imagination of genius distinctly reveals to us, and powerfully impresses upon us. When they appeal directly to the emotions of the heart, it is the power of Pathos which has awakened them; and when the suddenness, the unexpectedness, the apparent oddity of the one by the side of the other, strike the mind with irresistible force, it is the equally divine gift of Humour which has touched the spring of laughter by the side of the spring of tears."—Charles Dickens. A Lecture by Professor Ward. Delivered in Manchester, 30th November, 1870.
[266] I can't help but share some thoughts from the best critique of Dickens I've come across since his passing, which are very relevant to what I'm discussing. "Dickens had an imagination that was unmatched, not just in its vividness, but in its speed. I've purposely steered clear of needless comparisons between his works and those of other writers from his era, some of whom have passed away, while others continue to brighten our days and break the monotony of life. But when it comes to the power of his imagination— I'm convinced he surpassed them all. His imagination could summon up connections that, if we could just gather them all, would unite humanity and transform that phrase from just a label into a living truth. . . . Such connections can only be brought to life by sympathy, and imagination can sometimes perceive them. The great humorist brings them to each of us; and his genius is truly a gift beyond human origin, as it allows him to provide this service to the brotherhood of mankind. But there's more. This world has become so wonderfully the property of humanity that there’s not a single thing on it, whether alive or not, with which, or a similar thing with which, our minds haven’t engaged; . . . and with which human feelings, aspirations, thoughts have developed countless diverse associations. . . . These connections, which we only partially understand or often overlook, the imagination of genius clearly reveals to us and impresses upon us intensely. When they resonate with the emotions of the heart, it’s the power of Pathos that stirs them; and when the suddenness, unexpectedness, or the striking oddity of one thing next to another hits the mind powerfully, it’s the equally divine gift of Humor that triggers laughter alongside tears."—Charles Dickens. A Lecture by Professor Ward. Delivered in Manchester, 30th November, 1870.
[267] The opening of this letter (25th of August 1859), referring to a conviction for murder, afterwards reversed by a Home Office pardon against the continued and steadily expressed opinion of the judge who tried the case, is much too characteristic of the writer to be lost. "I cannot easily tell you how much interested I am by what you tell me of our brave and excellent friend. . . . I have often had more than half a mind to write and thank that upright judge. I declare to heaven that I believe such a service one of the greatest that a man of intellect and courage can render to society. . . . Of course I have been driving the girls out of their wits here, by incessantly proclaiming that there needed no medical evidence either way, and that the case was plain without it. . . . Lastly of course (though a merciful man—because a merciful man, I mean), I would hang any Home Secretary, Whig, Tory, Radical, or otherwise, who should step in between so black a scoundrel and the gallows. . . . I am reminded of Tennyson by thinking that King Arthur would have made short work of the amiable man! How fine the Idylls are! Lord! what a blessed thing it is to read a man who really can write. I thought nothing could be finer than the first poem, till I came to the third; but when I had read the last, it seemed to me to be absolutely unapproachable." Other literary likings rose and fell with him, but he never faltered in his allegiance to Tennyson.
[267] The opening of this letter (August 25, 1859), referencing a murder conviction that was later overturned by a Home Office pardon against the continued and firmly expressed opinion of the judge who presided over the case, is too characteristic of the writer to overlook. "I can hardly express how interested I am in what you share about our brave and wonderful friend. . . . I’ve often thought about writing to thank that honorable judge. I swear that I believe such an act is one of the greatest services a person of intellect and bravery can offer to society. . . . Of course, I’ve been driving the girls crazy here by constantly insisting that no medical evidence was needed either way, and that the case is clear without it. . . . And lastly, of course (though I’m a merciful man—because I mean to be merciful), I would hang any Home Secretary, whether Whig, Tory, Radical, or otherwise, who steps in between such a vile scoundrel and the gallows. . . . Thinking of Tennyson reminds me that King Arthur would have dealt swiftly with that pleasant fellow! How wonderful the Idylls are! Goodness! what a blessed thing it is to read a man who truly knows how to write. I thought nothing could be better than the first poem until I read the third; but after reading the last, it seemed completely unmatched." Other literary preferences fluctuated for him, but his loyalty to Tennyson never wavered.
[269] A dear friend now gone, used laughingly to relate what outcry there used to be, on the night of the week when a number was due, for "that Pip nonsense!" and what roars of laughter followed, though at first it was entirely put aside as not on any account to have time wasted over it.
[269] A dear friend who's no longer with us used to jokingly talk about the uproar that would happen on the night when a payment was due for "that Pip nonsense!" and how it led to bursts of laughter, even though initially it was completely dismissed as something that shouldn't waste anyone's time.
[270] There was no Chapter xx. as now; but the sentence which opens it ("For eleven years" in the original, altered to "eight years") followed the paragraph about his business partnership with Herbert, and led to Biddy's question whether he is sure he does not fret for Estella ("I am sure and certain, Biddy" as originally written, altered to "O no—I think not, Biddy"): from which point here was the close. "It was two years more, before I saw herself. I had heard of her as leading a most unhappy life, and as being separated from her husband who had used her with great cruelty, and who had become quite renowned as a compound of pride, brutality, and meanness. I had heard of the death of her husband (from an accident consequent on ill-treating a horse), and of her being married again to a Shropshire doctor, who, against his interest, had once very manfully interposed, on an occasion when he was in professional attendance on Mr. Drummle, and had witnessed some outrageous treatment of her. I had heard that the Shropshire doctor was not rich, and that they lived on her own personal fortune. I was in England again—in London, and walking along Piccadilly with little Pip—when a servant came running after me to ask would I step back to a lady in a carriage who wished to speak to me. It was a little pony carriage, which the lady was driving; and the lady and I looked sadly enough on one another. 'I am greatly changed, I know; but I thought you would like to shake hands with Estella too, Pip. Lift up that pretty child and let me kiss it!' (She supposed the child, I think, to be my child.) I was very glad afterwards to have had the interview; for, in her face and in her voice, and in her touch, she gave me the assurance, that suffering had been stronger than Miss Havisham's teaching, and had given her a heart to understand what my heart used to be."
[270] There wasn't a Chapter xx. like we have now; instead, the sentence that starts it ("For eleven years" in the original, changed to "eight years") followed the paragraph about his business partnership with Herbert and led to Biddy's question about whether he is sure he doesn't miss Estella ("I am sure and certain, Biddy" as initially written, changed to "Oh no—I think not, Biddy"): from that point, there was a conclusion. "It was two more years before I saw her. I had heard about her living a very unhappy life, being separated from her husband who had treated her cruelly, and who had become quite infamous for being a mix of pride, brutality, and meanness. I learned about her husband's death (from an accident while mistreating a horse) and that she had remarried a doctor from Shropshire, who, against his own best interests, had once bravely intervened while attending to Mr. Drummle, witnessing some terrible treatment of her. I heard that the Shropshire doctor wasn't wealthy and that they relied on her own fortune. I was back in England—in London—walking along Piccadilly with little Pip when a servant ran after me to say that a lady in a carriage wanted to speak to me. It was a small pony carriage that the lady was driving, and she and I looked at each other with a touch of sadness. 'I know I'm greatly changed, but I thought you would like to shake hands with Estella too, Pip. Pick up that pretty child and let me kiss it!' (She assumed the child was mine, I think.) I was really glad afterwards to have had that meeting; because in her face, her voice, and her touch, she gave me the reassurance that suffering had been stronger than Miss Havisham's lessons, and had given her a heart to understand what my heart used to be."
[271] On this reproach, from a Jewish lady whom he esteemed, he had written two years before. "Fagin, in Oliver Twist, is a Jew, because it unfortunately was true, of the time to which that story refers, that that class of criminal almost invariably was a Jew. But surely no sensible man or woman of your persuasion can fail to observe—firstly, that all the rest of the wicked dramatis personæ are Christians; and, secondly, that he is called 'The Jew,' not because of his religion, but because of his race."
[271] In response to a criticism from a Jewish woman he respected, he had written two years earlier. "Fagin, in Oliver Twist, is portrayed as a Jew because, unfortunately, at the time the story is set, that type of criminal was mostly Jewish. But surely no reasonable man or woman of your background can overlook—first, that all the other villains in the story are Christians; and, second, that he's referred to as 'The Jew' not because of his faith, but because of his ethnicity."
[272] Mr. Marcus Stone had, upon the separate issue of the Tale of Two Cities, taken the place of Mr. Hablot Browne as his illustrator. Hard Times and the first edition of Great Expectations were not illustrated; but when Pip's story appeared in one volume, Mr. Stone contributed designs for it.
[272] Mr. Marcus Stone had, with the release of the Tale of Two Cities, taken over from Mr. Hablot Browne as the illustrator. Hard Times and the first edition of Great Expectations didn’t have illustrations; however, when Pip's story was published in one volume, Mr. Stone provided designs for it.
[273] He thus spoke of it in his "Postscript in lieu of Preface" (dated 2nd of September 1865), which accompanied the last number of the story under notice. "On Friday the ninth of June in the present year, Mr. and Mrs. Boffin (in their manuscript dress of receiving Mr. and Mrs. Lammle at breakfast) were on the South-Eastern Railway with me, in a terribly destructive accident. When I had done what I could to help others, I climbed back into my carriage—nearly turned over a viaduct, and caught aslant upon the turn—to extricate the worthy couple. They were much soiled, but otherwise unhurt. The same happy result attended Miss Bella Wilfer on her wedding-day, and Mr. Riderhood inspecting Bradley Headstone's red neckerchief as he lay asleep. I remember with devout thankfulness that I can never be much nearer parting company with my readers for ever, than I was then, until there shall be written against my life the two words with which I have this day closed this book—The End."
[273] He discussed it in his "Postscript instead of Preface" (dated September 2, 1865), which accompanied the final issue of the story in question. "On Friday, June 9th of this year, Mr. and Mrs. Boffin (in their usual attire for welcoming Mr. and Mrs. Lammle at breakfast) were on the South-Eastern Railway with me during a terrible accident. After I did what I could to help others, I managed to climb back into my carriage—almost tipping over a viaduct, and caught awkwardly on the turn—to rescue the lovely couple. They were quite dirty, but otherwise unharmed. The same fortunate outcome happened for Miss Bella Wilfer on her wedding day, and Mr. Riderhood while examining Bradley Headstone's red neckerchief as he lay asleep. I remember with sincere gratitude that I can never be much closer to saying goodbye to my readers forever than I was then, until there are written against my life the two words with which I have now closed this book—The End."
[274] I borrow this language from the Bishop of Manchester, who, on the third day after Dickens's death, in the Abbey where he was so soon to be laid, closed a plea for the toleration of differences of opinion where the foundations of religious truth are accepted, with these words. "It will not be out of harmony with the line of thought we have been pursuing—certainly it will be in keeping with the associations of this place, dear to Englishmen, not only as one of the proudest Christian temples, but as containing the memorials of so many who by their genius in arts, or arms, or statesmanship, or literature, have made England what she is—if in the simplest and briefest words I allude to that sad and unexpected death which has robbed English literature of one of its highest living ornaments, and the news of which, two mornings ago, must have made every household in England feel as though they had lost a personal friend. He has been called in one notice an apostle of the people. I suppose it is meant that he had a mission, but in a style and fashion of his own; a gospel, a cheery, joyous, gladsome message, which the people understood, and by which they could hardly help being bettered; for it was the gospel of kindliness, of brotherly love, of sympathy in the widest sense of the word. I am sure I have felt in myself the healthful spirit of his teaching. Possibly we might not have been able to subscribe to the same creed in relation to God, but I think we should have subscribed to the same creed in relation to man. He who has taught us our duty to our fellow men better than we knew it before, who knew so well to weep with them that wept, and to rejoice with them that rejoiced, who has shown forth in all his knowledge of the dark corners of the earth how much sunshine may rest upon the lowliest lot, who had such evident sympathy with suffering, and such a natural instinct of purity that there is scarcely a page of the thousands he has written which might not be put into the hands of a little child, must be regarded by those who recognise the diversity of the gifts of the spirit as a teacher sent from God. He would have been welcomed as a fellow-labourer in the common interests of humanity by Him who asked the question 'If a man love not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?'"
[274] I borrow this language from the Bishop of Manchester, who, three days after Dickens's death, in the Abbey where he would soon be laid to rest, finished a plea for accepting differences of opinion where the foundations of religious truth are acknowledged, with these words. "It aligns with the thoughts we've been discussing—certainly it resonates with the significance of this place, cherished by English people, not only as one of the most celebrated Christian churches but as a site that holds the memorials of many who, through their talent in the arts, military, statesmanship, or literature, have shaped England into what it is—if I briefly mention that tragic and unexpected death which has taken away one of the brightest stars in English literature, and the news of which, two mornings ago, must have made every household in England feel as if they lost a personal friend. He has been referred to in one tribute as an apostle of the people. I assume it means he had a mission, but in his own unique style; a message that was cheerful and uplifting, which the people understood and by which they could only be improved; for it was the gospel of kindness, brotherly love, and a broad sense of sympathy. I know I’ve personally felt the positive spirit of his teachings. Perhaps we wouldn't have agreed on the same beliefs about God, but I believe we would have shared the same beliefs regarding humanity. He who has taught us our responsibilities to others better than we understood before, who knew how to weep with those who weep and rejoice with those who rejoice, who has demonstrated through his awareness of life’s struggles how much happiness can be found even in the humblest circumstances, who showed such deep compassion for those who suffer, and had such an innate sense of purity that there’s hardly a page among the thousands he wrote that wouldn’t be suitable to share with a child, must be seen by those who appreciate the variety of spiritual gifts as a teacher sent from God. He would have been welcomed as a fellow worker in the shared mission of humanity by Him who asked the question, ‘If a person doesn’t love their brother whom they have seen, how can they love God whom they have not seen?’"
[275] Among these I think he was most delighted with the great naturalist and philosopher, Agassiz, whose death is unhappily announced while I write, and as to whom it will no longer be unbecoming to quote his allusion. "Agassiz, who married the last Mrs. Felton's sister, is not only one of the most accomplished but the most natural and jovial of men." Again he says: "I cannot tell you how pleased I was by Agassiz, a most charming fellow, or how I have regretted his seclusion for a while by reason of his mother's death." A valued correspondent, Mr. Grant Wilson, sends me a list of famous Americans who greeted Dickens at his first visit, and in the interval had passed away. "It is melancholy to contemplate the large number of American authors who had, between the first and second visits of Mr. Dickens, 'gone hence, to be no more seen.' The sturdy Cooper, the gentle Irving, his friend and kinsman Paulding, Prescott the historian and Percival the poet, the eloquent Everett, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Edgar A. Poe, N. P. Willis, the genial Halleck, and many lesser lights, including Prof. Felton and Geo. P. Morris, had died during the quarter of a century that elapsed between Dickens's visits to this country, leaving a new generation of writers to extend the hand of friendship to him on his second coming."—Let me add to this that Dickens was pleased, at this second visit, to see his old secretary who had travelled so agreeably with him through his first tour of triumph. "He would have known him anywhere."
[275] Among these, I think he was most pleased with the great naturalist and philosopher, Agassiz, whose death is sadly announced while I'm writing. It's no longer inappropriate to quote his words. "Agassiz, who married the sister of Mrs. Felton, is not only one of the most accomplished but also the most genuine and cheerful of men." He also said, "I can't express how happy I was with Agassiz, a truly charming guy, or how much I've missed his company during his time of mourning for his mother." A valued correspondent, Mr. Grant Wilson, sent me a list of famous Americans who welcomed Dickens during his first visit, and who have since passed away. "It’s sad to reflect on the many American authors who, between Mr. Dickens’s first and second visits, ‘have gone hence, to be no more seen.’ The sturdy Cooper, the gentle Irving, his friend and relative Paulding, Prescott the historian, and Percival the poet, the eloquent Everett, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Edgar A. Poe, N. P. Willis, the friendly Halleck, and many others, including Prof. Felton and Geo. P. Morris, had died during the 25 years between Dickens's visits to this country, paving the way for a new generation of writers to welcome him on his return."—I should add that Dickens was happy, during this second visit, to see his old secretary who had traveled so pleasantly with him on his first triumphant tour. "He would have recognized him anywhere."
[276] few days later he described it to his daughter. "I couldn't help laughing at myself on my birthday at Washington; it was observed so much as though I were a little boy. Flowers and garlands of the most exquisite kind, arranged in all manner of green baskets, bloomed over the room; letters radiant with good wishes poured in; a shirt pin, a handsome silver travelling bottle, a set of gold shirt studs, and a set of gold sleeve links, were on the dinner table. Also, by hands unknown, the hall at night was decorated; and after Boots at the Holly Tree, the whole audience rose and remained, great people and all, standing and cheering, until I went back to the table and made them a little speech."
[276] A few days later, he told his daughter about it. "I couldn’t help but laugh at myself on my birthday in Washington; it felt like everyone was treating me like a little boy. The room was filled with beautiful flowers and garlands, all arranged in various green baskets; letters overflowing with good wishes came in; there was a shirt pin, a nice silver travel bottle, a set of gold shirt studs, and a pair of gold cufflinks on the dinner table. Also, by unknown hands, the hall was decorated at night; and after Boots at the Holly Tree, the entire audience, including all the important people, stood up and cheered until I returned to the table to give them a little speech."
[277] Mr. Dolby unconsciously contributed at this time to the same happy result by sending out some advertisements in these exact words: "The Reading will be comprised within two minutes, and the audience are earnestly entreated to be seated ten hours before its commencement." He had transposed the minutes and the hours.
[277] Mr. Dolby accidentally helped create the same happy outcome by sending out advertisements that read: "The Reading will last two minutes, and the audience is strongly encouraged to be seated ten hours beforehand." He had switched the minutes and the hours.
[278] What follows is from the close of the letter. "On my return, I have arranged with Chappell to take my leave of reading for good and all, in a hundred autumnal and winter Farewells for ever. I return by the Cunard steam-ship 'Russia.' I had the second officer's cabin on deck, when I came out; and I am to have the chief steward's going home. Cunard was so considerate as to remember that it will be on the sunny side of the vessel."
[278] What follows is from the end of the letter. "When I get back, I've arranged with Chappell to officially stop reading for good, with a hundred autumn and winter Farewells permanently. I'm returning on the Cunard steamship 'Russia.' I had the second officer's cabin on deck when I left, and I'll be in the chief steward's cabin on the way home. Cunard was thoughtful enough to remember that it will be on the sunny side of the ship."
[279] Here was his account of his mode of living for his last ten weeks in America. "I cannot eat (to anything like the necessary extent) and have established this system. At 7 in the morning, in bed, a tumbler of new cream and two tablespoonsful of rum. At 12, a sherry cobbler and a biscuit. At 3 (dinner time) a pint of champagne. At five minutes to 8, an egg beaten up with a glass of sherry. Between the parts, the strongest beef tea that can be made, drunk hot. At a quarter past 10, soup, and any little thing to drink that I can fancy. I do not eat more than half a pound of solid food in the whole four-and-twenty hours, if so much."
[279] Here is his account of how he lived during his last ten weeks in America. "I can't eat enough to meet my needs, so I've set up this routine. At 7 in the morning, in bed, I have a glass of fresh cream and two tablespoons of rum. At noon, I have a sherry cobbler and a biscuit. At 3 (dinner time), I have a pint of champagne. At five minutes to 8, I drink an egg mixed with a glass of sherry. Between those times, I have the strongest beef tea I can make, drunk hot. At a quarter past 10, I have soup and whatever else I feel like drinking. I don't eat more than half a pound of solid food in a whole day, if that."
[280] Here is the newspaper account: "At about five o'clock on Saturday the hosts began to assemble, but at 5.30 news was received that the expected guest had succumbed to a painful affection of the foot. In a short time, however, another bulletin announced Mr. Dickens's intention to attend the dinner at all hazards. At a little after six, having been assisted up the stairs, he was joined by Mr. Greeley, and the hosts forming in two lines silently permitted the distinguished gentlemen to pass through. Mr. Dickens limped perceptibly; his right foot was swathed, and he leaned heavily on the arm of Mr. Greeley. He evidently suffered great pain."
[280] Here is the newspaper account: "At around five o'clock on Saturday, the hosts started to gather, but by 5:30, news came in that the expected guest had suffered from a painful foot condition. However, shortly after, another update confirmed Mr. Dickens's determination to attend the dinner regardless of the situation. Just after six, with help getting up the stairs, he met Mr. Greeley, and the hosts lined up silently to let the distinguished gentlemen pass through. Mr. Dickens was visibly limping; his right foot was wrapped up, and he leaned heavily on Mr. Greeley's arm. He seemed to be in a lot of pain."
[281] "I think I shall be pretty correct in both places as to the run being on the Final readings. We had an immense house here" (Edinburgh, 12th of December) "last night, and a very large turnaway. But Glasgow being shady and the charges very great, it will be the most we can do, I fancy, on these first Scotch readings, to bring the Chappells safely home (as to them) without loss."
[281] "I think I'll be pretty accurate in both places regarding the run being on the final readings. We had a huge crowd here" (Edinburgh, December 12th) "last night, and a very large number of people turned away. But since Glasgow is less favorable and the costs are quite high, I believe the best we can do in these initial Scottish readings is to bring the Chappells back safely (as for them) without any losses."
[282] The close of the letter has an amusing picture which I may be excused for printing in a note. "The only news that will interest you is that the good-natured Reverdy Johnson, being at an Art Dinner in Glasgow the other night, and falling asleep over the post-prandial speeches (only too naturally), woke suddenly on hearing the name of 'Johnson' in a list of Scotch painters which one of the orators was enumerating; at once plunged up, under the impression that somebody was drinking his health; and immediately, and with overflowing amiability, began returning thanks. The spectacle was then presented to the astonished company, of the American Eagle being restrained by the coat tails from swooping at the moon, while the smaller birds endeavoured to explain to it how the case stood, and the cock robin in possession of the chairman's eye twittered away as hard as he could split. I am told that it was wonderfully droll."
[282] The end of the letter includes a funny story that I hope you won't mind me sharing. "The only news you might find interesting is about the good-natured Reverdy Johnson, who was at an Art Dinner in Glasgow the other night. He dozed off during the after-dinner speeches (which is understandable), and woke up suddenly when he heard the name 'Johnson' being mentioned in a list of Scottish painters that one of the speakers was going through. He thought someone was proposing a toast to him and jumped up, overflowing with good vibes, to start thanking everyone. The audience was treated to the sight of the American Eagle being held back by its coat tails from flying off to the moon, while the smaller birds tried to explain what was going on, and the chairman's little robin chirped away as fast as it could. I’ve been told it was incredibly funny."
[283] I take from the letter a mention of the effect on a friend. "The night before last, unable to get in, B. had a seat behind the screen, and was nearly frightened off it, by the Murder. Every vestige of colour had left his face when I came off, and he sat staring over a glass of champagne in the wildest way."
[283] I got from the letter a note about how it affected a friend. "The night before last, unable to get in, B. found a seat behind the screen, and was almost scared off it by the Murder. Every bit of color had drained from his face when I came out, and he sat there staring over a glass of champagne in the most unsettling way."
[284] In this letter Dickens wrote: "I thank you heartily" (23rd of June 1869) "for your great kindness and interest. It would really pain me if I thought you could seriously doubt my implicit reliance on your professional skill and advice. I feel as certain now as I felt when you came to see me on my breaking down through over fatigue, that the injunction you laid upon me to stop in my course of Readings was necessary and wise. And to its firmness I refer (humanly speaking) my speedy recovery from that moment. I would on no account have resumed, even on the turn of this year, without your sanction. Your friendly aid will never be forgotten by me; and again I thank you for it with all my heart."
[284] In this letter, Dickens wrote: "I truly appreciate your kindness and support" (June 23, 1869). "It would really upset me if I thought you could seriously doubt my complete trust in your professional skills and advice. I feel just as certain now as I did when you visited me during my breakdown from overwork that your recommendation for me to stop my Readings was necessary and wise. I attribute (from a human perspective) my quick recovery from that moment to your firm advice. I would have never resumed, even at the start of this year, without your approval. I will always remember your friendly assistance; and once again, I thank you for it with all my heart."
[285] In drawing the agreement for the publication, Mr. Ouvry had, by Dickens's wish, inserted a clause thought to be altogether needless, but found to be sadly pertinent. It was the first time such a clause had been inserted in one of his agreements. "That if the said Charles Dickens shall die during the composition of the said work of the Mystery of Edwin Drood, or shall otherwise become incapable of completing the said work for publication in twelve monthly numbers as agreed, it shall be referred to John Forster, Esq, one of Her Majesty's Commissioners in Lunacy, or in the case of his death, incapacity, or refusal to act, then to such person as shall be named by Her Majesty's Attorney-General for the time being, to determine the amount which shall be repaid by the said Charles Dickens, his executors or administrators, to the said Frederic Chapman as a fair compensation for so much of the said work as shall not have been completed for publication." The sum to be paid at once for 25,000 copies was £7500; publisher and author sharing equally in the profit of all sales beyond that impression; and the number reached, while the author yet lived, was 50,000. The sum paid for early sheets to America was £1000; and Baron Tauchnitz paid liberally, as he always did, for his Leipzig reprint. "All Mr. Dickens's works," M. Tauchnitz writes to me, "have been published under agreement by me. My intercourse with him lasted nearly twenty-seven years. The first of his letters dates in October 1843, and his last at the close of March 1870. Our long relations were not only never troubled by the least disagreement, but were the occasion of most hearty personal feeling; and I shall never lose the sense of his kind and friendly nature. On my asking him his terms for Edwin Drood, he replied 'Your terms shall be mine.'"
[285] When Mr. Ouvry was drafting the publication agreement, he included a clause at Dickens's request that seemed unnecessary at the time but turned out to be very relevant. This was the first time such a clause had been added to one of his agreements. "If Charles Dickens passes away during the writing of the work titled Mystery of Edwin Drood, or if he becomes unable to finish it for publication in the twelve monthly installments as planned, it will be referred to John Forster, Esq, one of Her Majesty's Commissioners in Lunacy, or if he is unable or unwilling to act, then to a person appointed by Her Majesty's Attorney-General at that time, to determine how much should be repaid by Charles Dickens, his executors or administrators, to Frederic Chapman as fair compensation for any part of the work that has not been completed for publication." The amount to be paid upfront for 25,000 copies was £7500; the publisher and the author would split the profits from any sales beyond that initial amount, and the total number sold while the author was still alive reached 50,000. The amount paid for early sheets to America was £1000; and Baron Tauchnitz generously compensated for his Leipzig reprint, as he always did. "All Mr. Dickens's works," M. Tauchnitz wrote to me, "have been published under agreement by me. My correspondence with him lasted nearly twenty-seven years. The first of his letters is from October 1843, and the last was at the end of March 1870. Our long relationship was never marred by any disagreements and was filled with genuine personal warmth; I will always remember his kind and friendly nature. When I asked him for his terms for Edwin Drood, he responded, 'Your terms shall be mine.'"
[286] "I have a very remarkable story indeed for you to read. It is in only two chapters. A thing never to melt into other stories in the mind, but always to keep itself apart." The story was published in the 37th number of the new series of All the Year Round, with the title of "An Experience." The "new series" had been started to break up the too great length of volumes in sequence, and the only change it announced was the discontinuance of Christmas Numbers. He had tired of them himself; and, observing the extent to which they were now copied in all directions (as usual with other examples set by him), he supposed them likely to become tiresome to the public.
[286] "I have a really remarkable story for you to read. It consists of just two chapters. It's something that never blends into other stories in your mind, but always stays separate." The story was published in the 37th issue of the new series of All the Year Round, titled "An Experience." The "new series" was launched to address the excessive length of the volumes in sequence, and the only change it introduced was the end of Christmas Numbers. He had grown tired of them himself; and, noticing how much they were being copied everywhere (as was typical with other trends he started), he figured they were likely to become boring to the public.
[287] The reader curious in such matters will be helped to the clue for much of this portion of the plot by reference to pp. 90, 103, and 109, in Chapters XII, XIII, and XIV.
[287] Readers interested in these topics can find important details for this part of the story by looking at pages 90, 103, and 109 in Chapters XII, XIII, and XIV.
[288] I subjoin what has been written to me by an American correspondent. "I went lately with the same inspector who accompanied Dickens to see the room of the opium-smokers, old Eliza and her Lascar or Bengalee friend. There a fancy seized me to buy the bedstead which figures so accurately in Edwin Drood, in narrative and picture. I gave the old woman a pound for it, and have it now packed and ready for shipment to New York. Another American bought a pipe. So you see we have heartily forgiven the novelist his pleasantries at our expense. Many military men who came to England from America refuse to register their titles, especially if they be Colonels; all the result of the basting we got on that score in Martin Chuzzlewit."
[288] Here’s what one of my American correspondents wrote to me. “Recently, I went with the same inspector who accompanied Dickens to check out the room where the opium smokers hang out, including old Eliza and her Lascar or Bengali friend. I got the idea to buy the bed that’s so famously featured in Edwin Drood, both in the story and in illustrations. I gave the old woman a pound for it, and now it’s packed and ready to be shipped to New York. Another American bought a pipe. So, as you can see, we’ve completely forgiven the novelist for his jokes at our expense. Many military men who came to England from America refuse to register their titles, especially if they’re Colonels; all because of the teasing we took on that front in Martin Chuzzlewit.”
[289] Mr. Grant Wilson has sent me an extract from a letter by Fitz-Greene Halleck (author of one of the most delightful poems ever written about Burns) which exactly expresses Dickens as he was, not only in 1842, but, as far as the sense of authorship went, all his life. It was addressed to Mrs. Rush of Philadelphia, and is dated the 8th of March 1842. "You ask me about Mr. Boz. I am quite delighted with him. He is a thorough good fellow, with nothing of the author about him but the reputation, and goes through his task as Lion with exemplary grace, patience, and good nature. He has the brilliant face of a man of genius. . . . His writings you know. I wish you had listened to his eloquence at the dinner here. It was the only real specimen of eloquence I have ever witnessed. Its charm was not in its words, but in the manner of saying them."
[289] Mr. Grant Wilson shared an excerpt from a letter by Fitz-Greene Halleck (the author of one of the most charming poems ever written about Burns) that perfectly captures Dickens as he was, not just in 1842, but throughout his life regarding his sense of authorship. This letter was addressed to Mrs. Rush of Philadelphia and is dated March 8, 1842. "You asked me about Mr. Boz. I'm really impressed with him. He’s a genuinely good guy, without the typical author vibe, aside from his reputation, and approaches his work with the grace, patience, and good humor of a lion. He has the striking face of a genius. . . . You know his writings. I wish you could have heard his speech at the dinner here. It was the only true example of eloquence I’ve ever seen. Its appeal wasn’t in the words themselves, but in how he delivered them."
[290] In a volume called Home and Abroad, by Mr. David Macrae, is printed a correspondence with Dickens on matters alluded to in the text, held in 1861, which will be found to confirm all that is here said.
[290] In a book titled Home and Abroad by David Macrae, there's a set of letters exchanged with Dickens about topics mentioned in this text, dated 1861, which will confirm everything said here.
[291] This letter is facsimile'd in A Christmas Memorial of Charles Dickens by A. B. Hume (1870), containing an Ode to his Memory written with feeling and spirit.
[291] This letter is copied in A Christmas Memorial of Charles Dickens by A. B. Hume (1870), which includes a heartfelt and spirited Ode to his Memory.
[292] I may quote here from a letter (Newcastle-on-Tyne, 5th Sept. 1858) sent me by the editor of the Northern Express. "The view you take of the literary character in the abstract, or of what it might and ought to be, expresses what I have striven for all through my literary life—never to allow it to be patronized, or tolerated, or treated like a good or a bad child. I am always animated by the hope of leaving it a little better understood by the thoughtless than I found it."—To James B. Manson, Esq.
[292] I want to quote a letter I received from the editor of the Northern Express (Newcastle-on-Tyne, September 5, 1858). "The perspective you have on the literary character in general, or what it could and should be, reflects what I've aimed for throughout my literary career—never to let it be looked down upon, tolerated, or treated like a well-behaved or misbehaved child. I'm always driven by the hope of making it a bit better understood by those who don’t think much about it than I found it."—To James B. Manson, Esq.
[294] By way of instance I subjoin an amusing insertion made by him in an otherwise indifferently written paper descriptive of the typical Englishman on the foreign stage, which gives in more comic detail experiences of his own already partly submitted to the reader (ii. 127). "In a pretty piece at the Gymnase in Paris, where the prime minister of England unfortunately ruined himself by speculating in railway shares, a thorough-going English servant appeared under that thorough-going English name Tom Bob—the honest fellow having been christened Tom, and born the lawful son of Mr. and Mrs. Bob. In an Italian adaptation of Dumas' preposterous play of Kean, which we once saw at the great theatre of Genoa, the curtain rose upon that celebrated tragedian, drunk and fast asleep in a chair, attired in a dark blue blouse fastened round the waist with a broad belt and a most prodigious buckle, and wearing a dark red hat of the sugar-loaf shape, nearly three feet high. He bore in his hand a champagne-bottle, with the label Rhum, in large capital letters, carefully turned towards the audience; and two or three dozen of the same popular liquor, which we are nationally accustomed to drink neat as imported, by the half gallon, ornamented the floor of the apartment. Every frequenter of the Coal Hole tavern in the Strand, on that occasion, wore a sword and a beard. Every English lady, presented on the stage in Italy, wears a green veil; and almost every such specimen of our fair countrywomen carries a bright red reticule, made in the form of a monstrous heart. We do not remember to have ever seen an Englishman on the Italian stage, or in the Italian circus, without a stomach like Daniel Lambert, an immense shirt-frill, and a bunch of watch-seals each several times larger than his watch, though the watch itself was an impossible engine. And we have rarely beheld this mimic Englishman, without seeing present, then and there, a score of real Englishmen sufficiently characteristic and unlike the rest of the audience, to whom he bore no shadow of resemblance." These views as to English people and society, of which Count d'Orsay used always to say that an average Frenchman knew about as much as he knew of the inhabitants of the moon, may receive amusing addition from one of Dickens's letters during his last visit to France; which enclosed a cleverly written Paris journal containing essays on English manners. In one of these the writer remarked that he had heard of the venality of English politicians, but could not have supposed it to be so shameless as it is, for, when he went to the House of Commons, he heard them call out "Places! Places!" "Give us Places!" when the Minister entered.
[294] For example, I include an entertaining addition he made to a mediocre article describing the typical Englishman abroad, which humorously details his own experiences that have already been partially shared with the reader (ii. 127). "In a charming play at the Gymnase in Paris, where the Prime Minister of England unfortunately ruined himself by investing in railway stocks, a classic English servant appeared with the fitting name Tom Bob—the honest guy was named Tom and was the legitimate son of Mr. and Mrs. Bob. In an Italian version of Dumas' absurd play Kean, which we once saw at the grand theater in Genoa, the curtain rose to reveal that famous tragedian, drunk and fast asleep in a chair, dressed in a dark blue blouse cinched at the waist with a wide belt featuring an enormous buckle, and wearing a tall dark red hat shaped like a sugar loaf that was nearly three feet high. He held a champagne bottle with the label Rum in large letters prominently displayed to the audience, while two or three dozen bottles of the same popular drink, which we are used to enjoying straight as it comes, decorated the floor of the room. Every patron of the Coal Hole tavern in the Strand at that moment wore a sword and had a beard. Every English lady presented on stage in Italy wore a green veil, and nearly all of these representations of our lovely countrywomen carried a bright red reticule shaped like a giant heart. I don’t recall ever seeing an Englishman on the Italian stage, or in an Italian circus, without a figure reminiscent of Daniel Lambert, a massive shirt frill, and a cluster of watch seals each much bigger than his watch, even though the watch itself seemed fantastical. And I have rarely observed this mock Englishman without also spotting a score of real Englishmen who were distinctive enough to stand out from the rest of the audience, looking nothing like him." These insights about English people and society, which Count d'Orsay used to say an average Frenchman understood about as well as he understood the inhabitants of the moon, could be humorously supplemented by one of Dickens's letters from his last trip to France; it included a cleverly composed Paris journal containing essays on English manners. In one of these essays, the author noted that while he had heard about the corruption of English politicians, he couldn't have imagined it was as blatant as it is, because when he went to the House of Commons, he heard them shout "Places! Places!" "Give us Places!" when the Minister walked in.
[297] On this remonstrance and Dickens's reply the Times had a leading article of which the closing sentences find fitting place in his biography. "If there be anything in Lord Russell's theory that Life Peerages are wanted specially to represent those forms of national eminence which cannot otherwise find fitting representation, it might be urged, for the reasons we have before mentioned, that a Life Peerage is due to the most truly national representative of one important department of modern English literature. Something may no doubt be said in favour of this view, but we are inclined to doubt if Mr. Dickens himself would gain anything by a Life Peerage. Mr. Dickens is pre-eminently a writer of the people and for the people. To our thinking, he is far better suited for the part of the 'Great Commoner' of English fiction than for even a Life Peerage. To turn Charles Dickens into Lord Dickens would be much the same mistake in literature that it was in politics to turn William Pitt into Lord Chatham."
[297] In response to this protest and Dickens's reply, the Times published a leading article, and the final sentences fit perfectly into his biography. "If there’s any truth to Lord Russell's idea that Life Peerages are needed to represent those forms of national achievement that can’t find fitting representation elsewhere, it could be argued, for the reasons we've mentioned before, that a Life Peerage is deserved by the most genuinely national representative of one significant branch of modern English literature. There's certainly some merit to this perspective, but we tend to doubt that Mr. Dickens would actually benefit from a Life Peerage. Mr. Dickens is undeniably a writer for the people and of the people. To us, he seems much better suited for the role of the 'Great Commoner' of English fiction rather than even a Life Peerage. Turning Charles Dickens into Lord Dickens would be a similar mistake in literature as it was in politics to elevate William Pitt to Lord Chatham."
[298] One of the many repetitions of the same opinion in his letters may be given. "Lord John's note" (September 1853) "confirms me in an old impression that he is worth a score of official men; and has more generosity in his little finger than a Government usually has in its whole corporation." In another of his public allusions, Dickens described him as a statesman of whom opponents and friends alike felt sure that he would rise to the level of every occasion, however exalted; and compared him to the seal of Solomon in the old Arabian story inclosing in a not very large casket the soul of a giant.
[298] One example of the many times he shared the same opinion in his letters can be highlighted. "Lord John's note" (September 1853) "reinforces an old belief of mine that he is worth more than a bunch of official people; and has more kindness in his little finger than a Government usually has in its entire body." In another public reference, Dickens described him as a politician whom both rivals and allies were confident would meet any challenge, no matter how significant; and he compared him to the seal of Solomon in the ancient Arabian tale, which contained the soul of a giant in a relatively small box.
[299] In a memoir by Dr. Shelton McKenzie which has had circulation in America, there is given the following statement, taken doubtless from publications at the time, of which it will be strictly accurate to say, that, excepting the part of its closing averment which describes Dickens sending a copy of his works to her Majesty by her own desire, there is in it not a single word of truth. "Early in 1870 the Queen presented a copy of her book upon the Highlands to Mr. Dickens, with the modest autographic inscription, 'from the humblest to the most distinguished author of England.' This was meant to be complimentary, and was accepted as such by Mr. Dickens, who acknowledged it in a manly, courteous letter. Soon after, Queen Victoria wrote to him, requesting that he would do her the favour of paying her a visit at Windsor. He accepted, and passed a day, very pleasantly, in his Sovereign's society. It is said that they were mutually pleased, that Mr. Dickens caught the royal lady's particular humour, that they chatted together in a very friendly manner, that the Queen was never tired of asking questions about certain characters in his books, that they had almost a tête-à-tête luncheon, and that, ere he departed, the Queen pressed him to accept a baronetcy (a title which descends to the eldest son), and that, on his declining, she said, 'At least, Mr. Dickens, let me have the gratification of making you one of my Privy Council.' This, which gives the personal title of 'Right Honourable,' he also declined—nor, indeed, did Charles Dickens require a title to give him celebrity. The Queen and the author parted, well pleased with each other. The newspapers reported that a peerage had been offered and declined—but even newspapers are not invariably correct. Mr. Dickens presented his Royal Mistress with a handsome set of all his works, and, on the very morning of his death, a letter reached Gad's Hill, written by Mr. Arthur Helps, by her desire, acknowledging the present, and describing the exact position the books occupied at Balmoral—so placed that she could see them before her when occupying the usual seat in her sitting-room. When this letter arrived, Mr. Dickens was still alive, but wholly unconscious. What to him, at that time, was the courtesy of an earthly sovereign?" I repeat that the only morsel of truth in all this rigmarole is that the books were sent by Dickens, and acknowledged by Mr. Helps at the Queen's desire. The letter did not arrive on the day of his death, the 9th of June, but was dated from Balmoral on that day.
[299] In a memoir by Dr. Shelton McKenzie that has circulated in America, the following statement is presented, likely drawn from contemporary publications, which is accurate to say that, except for the part at the end that mentions Dickens sending a copy of his works to Her Majesty at her request, there is not a single word of truth in it. "Early in 1870, the Queen gave a copy of her book on the Highlands to Mr. Dickens, with a modest handwritten note that said, 'from the humblest to the most distinguished author of England.' This was intended as a compliment, and Mr. Dickens accepted it as such, responding with a warm, courteous letter. Shortly after, Queen Victoria wrote to him, asking if he would do her the favor of visiting her at Windsor. He accepted and spent a very pleasant day in the Queen's company. It's said they both enjoyed each other's company, that Mr. Dickens appreciated the Queen's unique sense of humor, that they had a friendly conversation, that the Queen asked many questions about characters in his books, that they shared a nearly tête-à-tête lunch, and that before he left, the Queen urged him to accept a baronetcy (a title that passes to the eldest son), which he declined. She then offered him the honor of becoming a member of her Privy Council, which comes with the personal title of 'Right Honourable,' and he declined that as well—after all, Charles Dickens didn't need a title to be famous. The Queen and the author parted on good terms. The newspapers reported that a peerage was offered and rejected—but even newspapers are not always correct. Mr. Dickens gifted his Royal Mistress a beautiful set of all his works, and on the very morning of his death, a letter arrived at Gad's Hill, written by Mr. Arthur Helps at her request, acknowledging the gift and detailing the exact position of the books at Balmoral—arranged so she could see them from her usual spot in her sitting room. When this letter came, Mr. Dickens was still alive but completely unconscious. What did the courtesy of an earthly sovereign mean to him at that point?" I reiterate that the only piece of truth in this entire tale is that the books were sent by Dickens and acknowledged by Mr. Helps as the Queen requested. The letter was not received on the day of his death, June 9th, but was dated from Balmoral on that day.
[300] The book was thus entered in the catalogue. "Dickens (C.), A Christmas Carol, in prose, 1843; Presentation Copy, inscribed 'W. M. Thackeray, from Charles Dickens (whom he made very happy once a long way from home).'" Some pleasant verses by his friend had affected him much while abroad. I quote the Life of Dickens published by Mr. Hotten. "Her Majesty expressed the strongest desire to possess this presentation copy, and sent an unlimited commission to buy it. The original published price of the book was 5s. It became Her Majesty's property for £25 10s., and was at once taken to the palace."
[300] The book was then listed in the catalog. "A Christmas Carol by Dickens, in prose, 1843; Presentation Copy, inscribed 'W. M. Thackeray, from Charles Dickens (who made him very happy once far from home).'" Some nice verses from his friend had really touched him while he was away. I reference the Life of Dickens published by Mr. Hotten. "Her Majesty expressed a strong desire to have this presentation copy and sent an open-ended commission to acquire it. The original published price of the book was 5s. It became Her Majesty's possession for £25 10s., and was immediately taken to the palace."
[302] An entry, under the date of July 1833, from a printed but unpublished Diary by Mr. Payne Collier, appeared lately in the Athenæum, having reference to Dickens at the time when he first obtained employment as a reporter, and connecting itself with what my opening volume had related of those childish sufferings. "Soon afterwards I observed a great difference in C. D.'s dress, for he had bought a new hat and a very handsome blue cloak, which he threw over his shoulder à l' Espagnole. . . . We walked together through Hungerford Market, where we followed a coal-heaver, who carried his little rosy but grimy child looking over his shoulder; and C. D. bought a halfpenny-worth of cherries, and as we went along he gave them one by one to the little fellow without the knowledge of the father. . . . He informed me as we walked through it that he knew Hungerford Market well. . . . He did not affect to conceal the difficulties he and his family had had to contend against."
[302] An entry dated July 1833 from a printed but unpublished Diary by Mr. Payne Collier recently appeared in the Athenæum, mentioning Dickens at the time he first started working as a reporter, connecting to what my opening volume described about those childhood struggles. "Not long after, I noticed a big change in C. D.'s attire; he had bought a new hat and a really nice blue cloak that he draped over his shoulder à l' Espagnole. . . . We walked together through Hungerford Market, where we followed a coal-heaver carrying his little rosy but dirty child on his shoulder; and C. D. bought a halfpenny's worth of cherries, giving them one by one to the little boy without the father knowing. . . . He told me as we walked through that he knew Hungerford Market well. . . . He didn't pretend to hide the struggles he and his family faced."
[303] I desire to guard myself against any possible supposition that I think these Readings might have been stopped by the exercise of medical authority. I am convinced of the contrary. Dickens had pledged himself to them; and the fact that others' interests were engaged rather than his own supplied him with an overpowering motive for being determinedly set on going through with them. At the sorrowful time in the preceding year, when, yielding to the stern sentence passed by Sir Thomas Watson, he had dismissed finally the staff employed on his country readings, he had thus written to me. "I do believe" (3rd of May 1869) "that such people as the Chappells are very rarely to be found in human affairs. To say nothing of their noble and munificent manner of sweeping away into space all the charges incurred uselessly, and all the immense inconvenience and profitless work thrown upon their establishment, comes a note this morning from the senior partner, to the effect that they feel that my overwork has been 'indirectly caused by them, and by my great and kind exertions to make their venture successful to the extreme.' There is something so delicate and fine in this, that I feel it deeply." That feeling led to his resolve to make the additional exertion of these twelve last readings, and nothing would have turned him from it as long as he could stand at the desk.
[303] I want to make it clear that I don't think these Readings could have been stopped by medical intervention. I believe the opposite. Dickens was committed to them, and the fact that he was more focused on others' interests than his own gave him a strong reason to stay determined to see them through. During the sad time the previous year, when he had to let go of the staff involved in his country readings because of the harsh decision from Sir Thomas Watson, he wrote to me this: "I truly believe" (3rd of May 1869) "that people like the Chappells are very rare in this world. Not to mention their generous way of covering all the unnecessary costs and all the major inconveniences and pointless work they took on, I received a note this morning from the senior partner, saying that they feel my overwork has been 'indirectly caused by them, and by my great and kind efforts to make their venture as successful as possible.' There's something so thoughtful and refined about this that I really appreciate." This sentiment motivated him to push through with these twelve final readings, and nothing would have stopped him as long as he was able to stand at the desk.
[304] I preserve also the closing words of the letter. "It is very strange—you remember I suppose?—that the last time we spoke of him together, you said that we should one day hear that the wayward life into which he had fallen was over, and there an end of our knowledge of it." The waywardness, which was merely the having latterly withdrawn himself too much from old friendly intercourse, had its real origin in disappointments connected with the public work on which he was engaged in those later years, and to which he sacrificed every private interest of his own. His was only the common fate of Englishmen, so engaged, who do this; and when the real story of the "Fresco-painting for the Houses of Parliament" comes to be written, it will be another chapter added to our national misadventures and reproaches in everything connected with Art and its hapless cultivators.
[304] I also keep the closing words of the letter. "It's really strange—you remember, right?—that the last time we talked about him, you said we would eventually hear that the troubled life he fell into was over, and that would be the end of what we knew about it." His troubles, which were mainly just about how he had withdrawn too much from old friendships lately, actually stemmed from disappointments related to the public work he was involved in during those later years, which he put above every personal interest of his own. He faced the same fate as many Englishmen engaged in such work; when the true story of the "Fresco-painting for the Houses of Parliament" is finally told, it will simply add another chapter to our national failures and regrets regarding Art and its unfortunate creators.
[305] It is a duty to quote these eloquent words. "Statesmen, men of science, philanthropists, the acknowledged benefactors of their race, might pass away, and yet not leave the void which will be caused by the death of Dickens. They may have earned the esteem of mankind; their days may have been passed in power, honour, and prosperity; they may have been surrounded by troops of friends; but, however pre-eminent in station, ability, or public services, they will not have been, like our great and genial novelist, the intimate of every household. Indeed, such a position is attained not even by one man in an age. It needs an extraordinary combination of intellectual and moral qualities . . . before the world will thus consent to enthrone a man as their unassailable and enduring favourite. This is the position which Mr. Dickens has occupied with the English and also with the American public for the third of a century. . . . Westminster Abbey is the peculiar resting-place of English literary genius; and among those whose sacred dust lies there, or whose names are recorded on the walls, very few are more worthy than Charles Dickens of such a home. Fewer still, we believe, will be regarded with more honour as time passes and his greatness grows upon us."
[305] It's important to share these powerful words. "Statesmen, scientists, philanthropists, the recognized benefactors of their time, might come and go, but none will create the same void as Dickens's passing. They may have earned the respect of people; they might have enjoyed lives filled with power, honor, and prosperity; they could have been surrounded by many friends. However, no matter how exceptional their position, talent, or public service, they won't have been, like our beloved and warm-hearted novelist, a friend to every household. In fact, such a status is not something achieved by even one person in a generation. It requires an extraordinary mix of intellectual and moral qualities... before the world will agree to place a person on a pedestal as their unwavering and lasting favorite. This is the role that Mr. Dickens has held with both English and American audiences for the past thirty years... Westminster Abbey is the special resting place of English literary greatness; and among those whose sacred remains lie there, or whose names are inscribed on the walls, very few deserve such a resting place more than Charles Dickens. And even fewer, we believe, will be honored more as time goes on and his greatness becomes more apparent."
Transcriber's Notes:
Obvious punctuation errors repaired.
Punctuation errors fixed.
Varied hyphenation and capitalization of Devonshire Terrace was retained. Also fac-simile and facsimile. Varied spelling of A'Beckett/A'Becket was retained.
Varied hyphenation and capitalization of Devonshire Terrace was kept. Also fac-simile and facsimile. Varied spelling of A'Beckett/A'Becket was maintained.
The remaining corrections made are indicated by dotted lines under the corrections. Scroll the mouse over the word and the original text will appear.
The remaining corrections are highlighted with dotted lines beneath them. Hover over the word, and the original text will appear.
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!