This is a modern-English version of The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 15, No. 87, January, 1865: A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics, originally written by Various. It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling, and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.

Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.


THE

ATLANTIC MONTHLY,

A MAGAZINE OF

Literature, Art, and Politics.

VOLUME XV.

BOSTON:

BOSTON:

TICKNOR AND FIELDS,

TICKNOR AND FIELDS,

135 Washington Street.

135 Washington St.

LONDON: TRÜBNER AND COMPANY.

LONDON: TRÜBNER & COMPANY.

1865.

1865.

Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1865, by

Entered according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1865, by

TICKNOR AND FIELDS,

TICKNOR AND FIELDS,

in the Clerk's Office of the District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

in the Clerk's Office of the District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

University Press:

University Press

Electrotyped by Welch, Bigelow, & Co.,

Electrotyped by Welch, Bigelow, & Co..

Cambridge.

Cambridge.


CONTENTS.

Page
American Metropolis, TheFitz-Hugh Ludlow73
Andersonville, At285
Anno DominiGail Hamilton116
Authors, Memories ofMr. and Mrs. S. C. Hall97, 223, 330, 477
Battle-Laureate, OurOliver Wendell Holmes589
Birds, With theJohn Burroughs513
Chimney-Corner, TheMrs. H. B. Stowe109, 221, 353, 490, 602, 732
Cobden, RichardM. C. Conway724
Cruikshank, George, in Mexico54
Dely's CowRose Terry665
Doctor JohnsDonald G. Mitchell141, 296, 449, 591, 681
Dolliver Romance, Another Scene from theNathaniel Hawthorne1
England, A Letter aboutJohn Weiss641
Europe and Asia, BetweenBayard Taylor8
Everett, EdwardE. E. Hale342
Fair Play the Best PolicyT. W. Higginson623
Five Sisters Court at Christmas-Tide22
Foreign Enmity to the United States, Causes ofE. P. Whipple372
Great Lakes, TheSamuel C. Clarke693
GritE. P. Whipple407
Hofwyl, My Student-Life atRobert Dale Owen550
Ice and EsquimauxD. A. Wasson39, 201, 437, 564
"If Massa put Guns into our Han's"Fitz-Hugh Ludlow504
John Brown's RaidJohn G. Rosengarten711
Lecture, The PopularJ. G. Holland362
Lincoln, Abraham, The Place of, in HistoryGeorge Bancroft757
Lone Woman, Adventures of aJane G. Austin385
Mining, Ancient, on the Shores of Lake SuperiorAlbert D. Hagar308
Modern Improvements and our National DebtE. B. Bigelow729
Needle and Garden88, 165, 316, 464, 613, 673
Officer's Journal, Leaves fromT. W. Higginson65
Out of the SeaAuthor of "Life in the Iron-Mills"533
Painter, Our First Great, and his WorksSarah Clarke129
Pettibone Lineage, The419
Pianist, Notes of aLouis M. Gottschalk177, 350, 573
Pleiades of Connecticut, TheF. Sheldon187
Prose Henriade, AGail Hamilton653
RegnardF. Sheldon700
Revolution, Diplomacy of theProf. George W. Greene576
Richmond, Late Scenes inC. C. Coffin744
St. Mary's, Up theT. W. Higginson422
Sanitary, A Fortnight with theG. Reynolds233
Schumann's Quintette in E Flat MajorAnne M. Brewster718
Taney, Roger BrookeCharles M. Ellis151
Year, The Story of aHenry James, Jr.257

Poetry.

Autumn Walt, MyW. C. Bryant20
Carolina Coronado, To698
CastlesT. B. Aldrich622
Down!Henry H. Brownell756
First Citizen, OurOliver Wendell Holmes462
Frozen Harbor, TheJ. T. Trowbridge281
Garnaut HallT. B. Aldrich182
God Save the FlagO. W. Holmes115
Going to SleepElizabeth A. C. Akers680
Gold Egg.—A Dream FantasyJames Russell Lowell528
Grave by the lake, TheJohn G. Whittier561
HarpocratesBayard Taylor662
Hour of Victory, The371
Jaguar Hunt, TheJ. T. Trowbridge742
Kallundborg ChurchJohn G. Whittier51
Mantle of St. John de Matha, TheJohn G. Whittier162
Mr. Hosea Biglow to the Editor of the Atlantic MonthlyJames Russell Lowell501
Oldest Friend, OurO. W. Holmes340
Old House, TheAlice Cary213
Poet, To a, on his Birthday,315
Pro PatriaEpes Sargent232
Rubin BadfellowT. B. Aldrich437
Seventy-Six, On Board theJames Russell Lowell107
Spaniards' Graves at the Isles of Shoals, The406
Wind over the Chimney, TheHenry W. Longfellow7

Art.

Harriet Hosmer's ZenobiaFitz-Hugh Ludlow248

Reviews and Book Recommendations.

Beecher's Autobiography631
Bushnell's Christ and His Salvation377
Chamberlain's Autobiography of a New England Farm-House255
Child's Looking toward Sunset255
Cobbe's Broken Lights124
De Vries, Collection. German Series379
Dewey's Lowell Lectures286
Frothingham's Philosophy251
Hodde's Cradle of Rebellions380
Hosmer's Morrisons378
Hunt's Seer376
Ingelow's Studies for Stories378
Mendelssohn-Bartholdy's Letters126
Murdoch's Patriotism in Poetry and Prose250
Reynard the Fox380
Russell's Review of Todleben's History638
Sabine's Loyalists of the American Revolution123
Seaside and Fireside Fairies640
Thackeray's Vanity Fair639
Thoreau's Cape Cod381
Tuckerman's America and her Commentators122
Recent American Publications128, 382, 640, 764

THE

ATLANTIC MONTHLY.

A Magazine of Literature, Art, and Politics.

VOL. XV.—JANUARY, 1865.—NO. LXXXVII.

Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1864, by Ticknor and Fields, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts.

Entered according to the Act of Congress, in the year 1864, by Ticknor & Fields, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the District of Massachusetts.


ANOTHER SCENE FROM THE DOLLIVER ROMANCE.[A]

We may now suppose Grandsir Dolliver to have finished his breakfast, with a better appetite and sharper perception of the qualities of his food than he has generally felt of late years, whether it were due to old Martha's cookery or to the cordial of the night before. Little Pansie had also made an end of her bread and milk with entire satisfaction, and afterwards nibbled a crust, greatly enjoying its resistance to her little white teeth.

We can imagine that Grandsir Dolliver has finished his breakfast, feeling a better appetite and a sharper awareness of the qualities of his food than he has in recent years, whether it was due to old Martha's cooking or the drink from the night before. Little Pansie had also finished her bread and milk with complete satisfaction, and afterward nibbled on a crust, thoroughly enjoying how it resisted her tiny white teeth.

How this child came by the odd name of Pansie, and whether it was really her baptismal name, I have not ascertained. More probably it was one of those pet appellations that grow out of a child's character, or out of some keen thrill of affection in the parents, an unsought-for and unconscious felicity, a kind of revelation, teaching them the true name by which the child's guardian angel would know it,—a name with playfulness and love in it, that we often observe to supersede, in the practice of those who love the child best, the name that they carefully selected, and caused the clergyman to plaster indelibly on the poor little forehead at the font,—the love-name, whereby, if the child lives, the parents know it in their hearts, or by which, if it dies, God seems to have called it away, leaving the sound lingering faintly and sweetly through the house. In Pansie's case, it may have been a certain pensiveness which was sometimes seen under her childish frolic, and so translated itself into French, (pensée,) her mother having been of Acadian kin; or, quite as probably, it alluded merely to the color of her eyes, which, in some lights, were very like the dark petals of a tuft of pansies in the Doctor's garden. It might well be, indeed, on account of the suggested pensiveness; for the child's gayety had example to sustain it, no sympathy of other children or grown people,—and her melancholy, had it been so dark a feeling, was but the shadow of the house and of the old man. If brighter sunshine came, she would brighten with it. This morning, surely, as the three companions, Pansie, puss, and Grandsir Dolliver, emerged from the shadow of the house into the small adjoining enclosure, they seemed all frolicsome alike.

How this child ended up with the unusual name Pansie, and whether it was truly her given name, I haven’t figured out. It’s more likely that it was one of those affectionate nicknames that come from a child's personality or from a burst of love from the parents—an unexpected and unconscious joy, a sort of revelation, showing them the real name by which the child's guardian angel would recognize her—a name filled with playfulness and love that often replaces, in the practice of those who care for the child most, the name they carefully chose and had the clergyman permanently inscribe on the poor little forehead at the baptism—the love-name, by which, if the child grows up, the parents know her in their hearts, or by which, if she dies, God seems to have called her away, leaving the sound faintly and sweetly echoing through the house. In Pansie's case, it may have been a certain sadness that was sometimes visible beneath her playful demeanor, translating into French, (pensée), since her mother was of Acadian descent; or, just as likely, it simply referred to the color of her eyes, which, in certain light, resembled the dark petals of a cluster of pansies in the Doctor's garden. It could very well be because of the hinted sadness; for the child's cheerful disposition had no support from other children or adults, and her melancholy, if it was indeed that deep, was just a reflection of the house and the old man. If brighter sunlight came, she would brighten with it. This morning, as the three companions—Pansie, the cat, and Grandsir Dolliver—stepped out from the shadow of the house into the small adjoining yard, they all seemed just as playful.

The Doctor, however, was intent over[Pg 2] something that had reference to his life-long business of drugs. This little spot was the place where he was wont to cultivate a variety of herbs supposed to be endowed with medicinal virtue. Some of them had been long known in the pharmacopœia of the Old World; and others, in the early days of the country, had been adopted by the first settlers from the Indian medicine-men, though with fear and even contrition, because these wild doctors were supposed to draw their pharmaceutic knowledge from no gracious source, the Black Man himself being the principal professor in their medical school. From his own experience, however, Dr. Dolliver had long since doubted, though he was not bold enough quite to come to the conclusion, that Indian shrubs, and the remedies prepared from them, were much less perilous than those so freely used in European practice, and singularly apt to be followed by results quite as propitious. Into such heterodoxy our friend was the more liable to fall because it had been taught him early in life by his old master, Dr. Swinnerton, who, at those not infrequent times when he indulged a certain unhappy predilection for strong waters, had been accustomed to inveigh in terms of the most cynical contempt and coarsest ridicule against the practice by which he lived, and, as he affirmed, inflicted death on his fellow-men. Our old apothecary, though too loyal to the learned profession with which he was connected fully to believe this bitter judgment, even when pronounced by his revered master, was still so far influenced that his conscience was possibly a little easier when making a preparation from forest herbs and roots than in the concoction of half a score of nauseous poisons into a single elaborate drug, as the fashion of that day was.

The Doctor, however, was focused on[Pg 2] something related to his lifelong work with drugs. This small area was where he used to grow a variety of herbs thought to have healing properties. Some of them had long been known in the Old World’s pharmacopoeia, while others had been adopted by the early settlers from Native American medicine men, though often with fear and regret, because these wild healers were believed to have learned their medical knowledge from an untrustworthy source, with the Black Man himself being the main teacher in their healing practices. From his own experience, however, Dr. Dolliver had started to doubt, although he wasn't quite daring enough to fully believe it, that Indian plants and the remedies made from them were much less dangerous than those commonly used in European medicine, and surprisingly likely to lead to equally beneficial results. He was more prone to this unorthodox belief because his old mentor, Dr. Swinnerton, had taught him early on that, during his not-so-rare moments of indulgence in strong drinks, he would often criticize with cynical disdain and harsh ridicule the practice he relied on to make a living, claiming it caused harm to his fellow humans. Although our old apothecary was too committed to the esteemed profession he was part of to fully accept this harsh judgment, even coming from his respected mentor, he was still somewhat influenced by it, feeling his conscience was a little easier when preparing remedies from forest herbs and roots than when mixing a dozen unpleasant poisons into one complicated drug, which was the trend of the time.

But there were shrubs in the garden of which he had never ventured to make a medical use, nor, indeed, did he know their virtue, although from year to year he had tended and fertilized, weeded and pruned them, with something like religious care. They were of the rarest character, and had been planted by the learned and famous Dr. Swinnerton, who on his death-bed, when he left his dwelling and all his abstruse manuscripts to his favorite pupil, had particularly directed his attention to this row of shrubs. They had been collected by himself from remote countries, and had the poignancy of torrid climes in them; and he told him, that, properly used, they would be worth all the rest of the legacy a hundred-fold. As the apothecary, however, found the manuscripts, in which he conjectured there was a treatise on the subject of these shrubs, mostly illegible, and quite beyond his comprehension in such passages as he succeeded in puzzling out, (partly, perhaps, owing to his very imperfect knowledge of Latin, in which language they were written,) he had never derived from them any of the promised benefit. And to say the truth, remembering that Dr. Swinnerton himself never appeared to triturate or decoct or do anything else with the mysterious herbs, our old friend was inclined to imagine the weighty commendation of their virtues to have been the idly solemn utterance of mental aberration at the hour of death. So, with the integrity that belonged to his character, he had nurtured them as tenderly as was possible in the ungenial climate and soil of New England, putting some of them into pots for the winter; but they had rather dwindled than flourished, and he had reaped no harvests from them, nor observed them with any degree of scientific interest.

But there were shrubs in the garden that he had never dared to use for medicine, nor did he really know their benefits, even though year after year he had tended to them with almost religious devotion—fertilizing, weeding, and pruning. They were quite rare and had been planted by the renowned Dr. Swinnerton, who, on his deathbed, when he left his home and all his complex manuscripts to his favorite student, specifically pointed out this row of shrubs. He had collected them from distant lands, and they carried the essence of hot climates within them; he told his pupil that, if used correctly, they would be worth a hundred times the rest of the inheritance. However, the apothecary found the manuscripts, which he suspected contained a treatise on these shrubs, largely illegible and far beyond his understanding, especially in parts he managed to decipher—partly due to his limited knowledge of Latin, the language they were written in. As a result, he had never gained any of the promised benefits. To be honest, remembering that Dr. Swinnerton himself never seemed to crush, boil, or do anything else with the mysterious herbs, our old friend started to think that the glowing praise of their virtues might have just been the solemn babblings of a confused mind at the time of death. So, with the integrity that defined him, he had cared for them as best as he could in the harsh climate and soil of New England, even putting some in pots for the winter; but they had mostly shriveled rather than thrived, and he had reaped no harvest from them, nor had he watched them with any real scientific curiosity.

His grandson, however, while yet a school-boy, had listened to the old man's legend of the miraculous virtues of these plants; and it took so firm a hold of his mind, that the row of outlandish vegetables seemed rooted in it, and certainly flourished there with richer luxuriance than in the soil where they actually grew. The story, acting thus early upon his imagination, may be said to have influenced his brief career in life, and, perchance, brought about its early close. The young man, in the opinion of competent judges, was endowed with remarkable abilities, and according to the rumor of the people had wonderful gifts,[Pg 3] which were proved by the cures he had wrought with remedies of his own invention. His talents lay in the direction of scientific analysis and inventive combination of chemical powers. While under the pupilage of his grandfather, his progress had rapidly gone quite beyond his instructor's hope,—leaving him even to tremble at the audacity with which he overturned and invented theories, and to wonder at the depth at which he wrought beneath the superficialness and mock-mystery of the medical science of those days, like a miner sinking his shaft and running a hideous peril of the earth caving in above him. Especially did he devote himself to these plants; and under his care they had thriven beyond all former precedent, bursting into luxuriance of bloom, and most of them bearing beautiful flowers, which, however, in two or three instances, had the sort of natural repulsiveness that the serpent has in its beauty, compelled against its will, as it were, to warn the beholder of an unrevealed danger. The young man had long ago, it must be added, demanded of his grandfather the documents included in the legacy of Professor Swinnerton, and had spent days and nights upon them, growing pale over their mystic lore, which seemed the fruit not merely of the Professor's own labors, but of those of more ancient sages than he; and often a whole volume seemed to be compressed within the limits of a few lines of crabbed manuscript, judging from the time which it cost even the quick-minded student to decipher them.

His grandson, while still a schoolboy, had listened to the old man's tale about the amazing qualities of these plants; it took such a strong hold on his mind that the unusual vegetables felt rooted in it, thriving there with more richness than in the soil where they actually grew. This story, influencing his imagination early on, may have shaped his brief life and possibly led to its premature end. The young man was believed by knowledgeable judges to have remarkable abilities, and according to local rumors, he had incredible gifts,[Pg 3] proven by the cures he performed using remedies he invented. His talents lay in scientific analysis and creatively combining chemical properties. While learning from his grandfather, he advanced far beyond his teacher's expectations—making his mentor tremble at the boldness with which he dismantled and created theories, and leaving him in awe of the depth he achieved beneath the superficial and pretentious mysteries of medical science at that time, like a miner digging a shaft while risking the danger of a collapse above. He especially focused on these plants, and under his care, they flourished like never before, bursting into beautiful blooms, with most producing lovely flowers that, in a few cases, had a natural repulsiveness reminiscent of a snake’s beauty—warning the observer of an unseen danger. It should also be noted that the young man had long ago asked his grandfather for the documents left behind by Professor Swinnerton and had spent countless days and nights poring over them, growing pale from the mystic knowledge they contained, which seemed to be the work of not just the Professor but also of ancient sages before him; often, a single volume seemed to be packed into just a few lines of difficult handwriting, judging by how long it took even the quick-minded student to decipher them.

Meantime these abstruse investigations had not wrought such disastrous effects as might have been feared, in causing Edward Dolliver to neglect the humble trade, the conduct of which his grandfather had now relinquished almost entirely into his hands. On the contrary, with the mere side results of his study, or what may be called the chips and shavings of his real work, he created a prosperity quite beyond anything that his simple-minded predecessor had ever hoped for, even at the most sanguine epoch of his life. The young man's adventurous endowments were miraculously alive, and connecting themselves with his remarkable ability for solid research, and perhaps his conscience being as yet imperfectly developed, (as it sometimes lies dormant in the young,) he spared not to produce compounds which, if the names were anywise to be trusted, would supersede all other remedies, and speedily render any medicine a needless thing, making the trade of apothecary an untenable one, and the title of Doctor obsolete. Whether there was real efficacy in these nostrums, and whether their author himself had faith in them, is more than can safely be said; but at all events, the public believed in them, and thronged to the old and dim sign of the Brazen Serpent, which, though hitherto familiar to them and their forefathers, now seemed to shine with auspicious lustre, as if its old Scriptural virtues were renewed. If any faith was to be put in human testimony, many marvellous cures were really performed, the fame of which spread far and wide, and caused demands for these medicines to come in from places far beyond the precincts of the little town. Our old apothecary, now degraded by the overshadowing influence of his grandson's character to a position not much above that of a shop-boy, stood behind the counter with a face sad and distrustful, and yet with an odd kind of fitful excitement in it, as if he would have liked to enjoy this new prosperity, had he dared. Then his venerable figure was to be seen dispensing these questionable compounds by the single bottle and by the dozen, wronging his simple conscience as he dealt out what he feared was trash or worse, shrinking from the reproachful eyes of every ancient physician who might chance to be passing by, but withal examining closely the silver or the New England coarsely printed bills which he took in payment, as if apprehensive that the delusive character of the commodity which he sold might be balanced by equal counterfeiting in the money received, or as if his faith in all things were shaken.[Pg 4]

Meanwhile, these complicated investigations hadn't caused the disastrous outcomes that might have been expected, leading Edward Dolliver to neglect the simple trade his grandfather had almost fully handed over to him. On the contrary, using only the side results of his studies—what could be considered the leftover scraps of his real work—he generated a level of prosperity that far exceeded anything his straightforward predecessor had ever dreamed of, even during the most optimistic times of his life. The young man’s adventurous spirit was remarkably alive, and when combined with his exceptional talent for rigorous research, plus perhaps a somewhat underdeveloped conscience, he didn’t hesitate to produce remedies that, if their names could be trusted, would replace all other treatments and swiftly render any medicine unnecessary, making the role of apothecary unviable and the title of Doctor outdated. Whether these concoctions actually worked and whether their creator believed in them is hard to say; however, the public certainly believed in them, flocking to the old and faded sign of the Brazen Serpent, which, though familiar to them and their ancestors, now seemed to shine with a hopeful glow, as if its old Biblical virtues had been revived. If human testimony held any weight, many amazing cures indeed took place, and news of these spread far and wide, generating demand for these medicines from places well beyond the little town. Our old apothecary, now overshadowed by the strong presence of his grandson, found himself in a position not much better than that of a shop boy. He stood behind the counter with a sad and doubtful expression, yet also with a strange, occasional glimmer of excitement, as if he might have liked to enjoy this newfound prosperity if he had dared. There was the sight of his venerable figure dispensing these questionable remedies, whether by the single bottle or by the dozen, compromising his simple conscience as he handed out what he feared was either worthless or worse, while he tried to avoid the reproachful gazes of any ancient physician who happened to walk by, all the while scrutinizing the silver coins or crudely printed New England bills taken in payment, as if worried that the misleading nature of what he sold might be matched by equal deception in the money received, or as if his faith in everything was shaken.[Pg 4]

Is it not possible that this gifted young man had indeed found out those remedies which Nature has provided and laid away for the cure of every ill?

Is it possible that this talented young man has actually discovered the remedies that Nature has provided and set aside for the cure of every illness?

The disastrous termination of the most brilliant epoch that ever came to the Brazen Serpent must be told in a few words. One night, Edward Dolliver's young wife awoke, and, seeing the gray dawn creeping into the chamber, while her husband, it should seem, was still engaged in his laboratory, arose in her night-dress, and went to the door of the room to put in her gentle remonstrance against such labor. There she found him dead,—sunk down out of his chair upon the hearth, where were some ashes, apparently of burnt manuscripts, which appeared to comprise most of those included in Doctor Swinnerton's legacy, though one or two had fallen near the heap, and lay merely scorched beside it. It seemed as if he had thrown them into the fire, under a sudden impulse, in a great hurry and passion. It may be that he had come to the perception of something fatally false and deceptive in the successes which he had appeared to win, and was too proud and too conscientious to survive it. Doctors were called in, but had no power to revive him. An inquest was held, at which the jury, under the instruction, perhaps, of those same revengeful doctors, expressed the opinion that the poor young man, being given to strange contrivances with poisonous drugs, had died by incautiously tasting them himself. This verdict, and the terrible event itself, at once deprived the medicines of all their popularity; and the poor old apothecary was no longer under any necessity of disturbing his conscience by selling them. They at once lost their repute, and ceased to be in any demand. In the few instances in which they were tried the experiment was followed by no good results; and even those individuals who had fancied themselves cured, and had been loudest in spreading the praises of these beneficent compounds, now, as if for the utter demolition of the poor youth's credit, suffered under a recurrence of the worst symptoms, and, in more than one case, perished miserably: insomuch (for the days of witchcraft were still within the memory of living men and women) it was the general opinion that Satan had been personally concerned in this affliction, and that the Brazen Serpent, so long honored among them, was really the type of his subtle malevolence and perfect iniquity. It was rumored even that all preparations that came from the shop were harmful,—that teeth decayed that had been made pearly white by the use of the young chemist's dentifrice,—that cheeks were freckled that had been changed to damask roses by his cosmetics,—that hair turned gray or fell off that had become black, glossy, and luxuriant from the application of his mixtures,—that breath which his drugs had sweetened had now a sulphurous smell. Moreover, all the money heretofore amassed by the sale of them had been exhausted by Edward Dolliver in his lavish expenditure for the processes of his study; and nothing was left for Pansie, except a few valueless and unsalable bottles of medicine, and one or two others, perhaps more recondite than their inventor had seen fit to offer to the public. Little Pansie's mother lived but a short time after the shock of the terrible catastrophe; and, as we began our story with saying, she was left with no better guardianship or support than might be found in the efforts of a long superannuated man.

The tragic end of the most remarkable period that ever graced the Brazen Serpent needs to be summarized briefly. One night, Edward Dolliver's young wife woke up and, seeing the gray dawn creeping into the room while her husband seemed to still be working in his lab, got out of bed in her nightgown and went to the door to softly protest his late-night work. There, she found him dead—collapsed out of his chair onto the hearth, where some ashes remained, apparently from burned manuscripts, most of which were part of Doctor Swinnerton's legacy; a couple had fallen near the pile, merely scorched beside it. It looked like he had thrown them into the fire suddenly, in a rush of strong emotion. Perhaps he had realized something tragically false and deceptive in the successes he had seemed to achieve and felt too proud and too guilty to face it. Doctors were called, but they couldn't bring him back. An inquest was held, where the jury, possibly under the influence of those same spiteful doctors, concluded that the young man, known for his odd experiments with poisonous drugs, had accidentally poisoned himself by tasting them. This verdict, along with the horrible incident itself, immediately stripped the medicines of their popularity, and the poor old apothecary no longer needed to wrestle with his conscience over selling them. They rapidly lost their reputation and fell out of demand. In the few cases where they were tried, the results were disappointing; even those who had believed they were cured and had praised these miraculous compounds now faced a return of their worst symptoms, with several even dying painfully. Given that the days of witchcraft were still fresh in people's memories, it was widely believed that Satan had played a personal role in this tragedy and that the Brazen Serpent, which had long been revered, was actually a symbol of his insidious evil and complete wickedness. Rumors spread that all products from the shop were harmful—that teeth that had been made pearly white by the young chemist's toothpaste now decayed—that cheeks that had turned into rosy hues from his cosmetics were now freckled—that hair that had become shiny and luxurious from his formulas turned gray or fell out—and that breath, once sweetened by his drugs, now had a foul smell. Furthermore, all the money previously earned from selling these products had been spent by Edward Dolliver on extravagant expenses for his research; and nothing was left for Pansie except a few worthless and unsellable bottles of medicine, along with a couple of others that were perhaps too obscure for the inventor to market. Little Pansie's mother didn't survive long after the shock of the terrible tragedy; and, as we noted at the beginning of our story, she was left with no better guardianship or support than the efforts of an elderly man.

Nothing short of the simplicity, integrity, and piety of Grandsir Dolliver's character, known and acknowledged as far back as the oldest inhabitants remembered anything, and inevitably discoverable by the dullest and most prejudiced observers, in all its natural manifestations, could have protected him in still creeping about the streets. So far as he was personally concerned, however, all bitterness and suspicion had speedily passed away; and there remained still the careless and neglectful good-will, and the prescriptive reverence, not altogether reverential, which the world heedlessly awards to the unfortunate[Pg 5] individual who outlives his generation.

Nothing less than the simplicity, integrity, and piety of Grandsir Dolliver's character, recognized and acknowledged by even the oldest residents for as long as anyone can remember, and easily noticeable by the dullest and most biased observers in all its natural forms, could have kept him from wandering the streets. As far as he was personally concerned, all bitterness and suspicion had quickly faded away; what remained was a careless and neglectful goodwill, along with a kind of reverence, not entirely respectful, that the world mindlessly gives to the unfortunate individual who outlives his generation.[Pg 5]

And now that we have shown the reader sufficiently, or at least to the best of our knowledge, and perhaps at tedious length, what was the present position of Grandsir Dolliver, we may let our story pass onward, though at such a pace as suits the feeble gait of an old man.

And now that we've clearly shown the reader, or at least to the best of our ability—and maybe a bit too long—what Grandsir Dolliver's current situation is, we can move our story forward, though at a pace that fits the slow walk of an old man.

The peculiarly brisk sensation of this morning, to which we have more than once alluded, enabled the Doctor to toil pretty vigorously at his medicinal herbs,—his catnip, his vervain, and the like; but he did not turn his attention to the row of mystic plants, with which so much of trouble and sorrow either was, or appeared to be, connected. In truth, his old soul was sick of them, and their very fragrance, which the warm sunshine made strongly perceptible, was odious to his nostrils. But the spicy, homelike scent of his other herbs, the English simples, was grateful to him, and so was the earth-smell, as he turned up the soil about their roots, and eagerly snuffed it in. Little Pansie, on the other hand, perhaps scandalized at great-grandpapa's neglect of the prettiest plants in his garden, resolved to do her small utmost towards balancing his injustice; so, with an old shingle, fallen from the roof, which she had appropriated as her agricultural tool, she began to dig about them, pulling up the weeds, as she saw grandpapa doing. The kitten, too, with a look of elfish sagacity, lent her assistance, plying her paws with vast haste and efficiency at the roots of one of the shrubs. This particular one was much smaller than the rest, perhaps because it was a native of the torrid zone, and required greater care than the others to make it nourish; so that, shrivelled, cankered, and scarcely showing a green leaf, both Pansie and the kitten probably mistook it for a weed. After their joint efforts had made a pretty big trench about it, the little girl seized the shrub with both hands, bestriding it with her plump little legs, and giving so vigorous a pull, that, long accustomed to be transplanted annually, it came up by the roots, and little Pansie came down in a sitting posture, making a broad impress on the soft earth. "See, see, Doctor!" cries Pansie, comically enough giving him his title of courtesy,—"look, grandpapa, the big, naughty weed!"

The oddly refreshing feeling of this morning, which we have mentioned more than once, allowed the Doctor to work quite energetically on his medicinal herbs—his catnip, his vervain, and the like; however, he did not focus on the row of mystical plants that were, or seemed to be, associated with so much trouble and sorrow. In reality, he was tired of them, and even their scent, made more noticeable by the warm sunshine, was unpleasant to him. But he enjoyed the spicy, homey smell of his other herbs, the English simples, and he appreciated the earthy aroma as he turned up the soil around their roots, eagerly inhaling it. Little Pansie, on the other hand, perhaps surprised by great-grandpa's neglect of the prettiest plants in his garden, decided to do her best to correct his oversight; so, with an old shingle that had fallen from the roof, which she had claimed as her gardening tool, she began to dig around them, pulling up the weeds as she had seen grandpa do. The kitten, too, with a mischievous look, helped her by quickly using its paws on the roots of one of the shrubs. This particular shrub was much smaller than the others, probably because it was a native of a hot climate and needed more care to thrive; as a result, shriveled, diseased, and barely showing a green leaf, both Pansie and the kitten likely mistook it for a weed. After their teamwork had created a fairly large trench around it, the little girl grabbed the shrub with both hands, straddling it with her chubby little legs, and gave such a strong pull that, having been used to being transplanted every year, it came up by the roots, causing little Pansie to sit down suddenly, leaving a big impression in the soft earth. "See, see, Doctor!" Pansie exclaimed, humorously giving him a title of respect—"look, grandpa, the big, naughty weed!"

Now the Doctor had at once a peculiar dread and a peculiar value for this identical shrub, both because his grandson's investigations had been applied more ardently to it than to all the rest, and because it was associated in his mind with an ancient and sad recollection. For he had never forgotten that his wife, the early lost, had once taken a fancy to wear its flowers, day after day, through the whole season of their bloom, in her bosom, where they glowed like a gem, and deepened her somewhat pallid beauty with a richness never before seen in it. At least such was the effect which this tropical flower imparted to the beloved form in his memory, and thus it somehow both brightened and wronged her. This had happened not long before her death; and whenever, in the subsequent years, this plant had brought its annual flower, it had proved a kind of talisman to bring up the image of Bessie, radiant with this glow that did not really belong to her naturally passive beauty, quickly interchanging with another image of her form, with the snow of death on cheek and forehead. This reminiscence had remained among the things of which the Doctor was always conscious, but had never breathed a word, through the whole of his long life,—a sprig of sensibility that perhaps helped to keep him tenderer and purer than other men, who entertain no such follies. And the sight of the shrub often brought back the faint, golden gleam of her hair, as if her spirit were in the sun-lights of the garden, quivering into view and out of it. And therefore, when he saw what Pansie had done, he sent forth a strange, inarticulate, hoarse, tremulous exclamation, a sort of aged and decrepit cry of mingled emotion. "Naughty Pansie, to pull up grandpapa's flower!" said he, as soon as he could[Pg 6] speak. "Poison, Pansie, poison! Fling it away, child!"

Now the Doctor had a strange mix of fear and value for this particular shrub. His grandson had shown more interest in it than anything else, and it was tied to an old, sad memory. He could never forget that his long-lost wife used to love wearing its flowers, day after day, for the entire season, tucked in her bosom where they sparkled like gems and added a richness to her otherwise pale beauty that he had never seen before. At least, that’s how he remembered it. In his mind, the tropical flower both brightened and misrepresented her. This happened not long before she died, and every year when the plant bloomed, it acted like a talisman, bringing back the image of Bessie, glowing in a way that didn’t truly reflect her naturally gentle beauty, quickly shifting to another image of her with the pallor of death on her cheeks and forehead. This memory lingered with the Doctor throughout his long life, never spoken of, perhaps keeping him more sensitive and pure than other men who didn't have such attachments. Seeing the shrub often reminded him of the faint golden shimmer of her hair, as if her spirit was present in the sunlight of the garden, appearing and disappearing. So when he saw what Pansie had done, he let out a strange, inarticulate, hoarse cry filled with mixed emotions. "Naughty Pansie, pulling up grandpa's flower!" he said as soon as he could[Pg 6] speak. "Poison, Pansie, poison! Get rid of it, child!"

And dropping his spade, the old gentleman scrambled towards the little girl as quickly as his rusty joints would let him,—while Pansie, as apprehensive and quick of motion as a fawn, started up with a shriek of mirth and fear to escape him. It so happened that the garden-gate was ajar; and a puff of wind blowing it wide open, she escaped through this fortuitous avenue, followed by great-grandpapa and the kitten.

And dropping his spade, the old man hurried toward the little girl as fast as his stiff joints would allow, while Pansie, as nervous and quick as a fawn, jumped up with a mix of laughter and fear to get away from him. Luckily, the garden gate was slightly open, and a gust of wind blew it wide, allowing her to slip through this unexpected opening, with great-grandpa and the kitten right behind her.

"Stop, naughty Pansie, stop!" shouted our old friend. "You will tumble into the grave!" The kitten, with the singular sensitiveness that seems to affect it at every kind of excitement, was now on her back.

"Stop, naughty Pansie, stop!" shouted our old friend. "You’ll fall into the grave!" The kitten, with the unique sensitivity that seems to hit her during any kind of excitement, was now lying on her back.

And, indeed, this portentous warning was better grounded and had a more literal meaning than might be supposed; for the swinging gate communicated with the burial-ground, and almost directly in little Pansie's track there was a newly dug grave, ready to receive its tenant that afternoon. Pansie, however, fled onward with outstretched arms, half in fear, half in fun, plying her round little legs with wonderful promptitude, as if to escape Time or Death, in the person of Grandsir Dolliver, and happily avoiding the ominous pitfall that lies in every person's path, till, hearing a groan from her pursuer, she looked over her shoulder, and saw that poor grandpapa had stumbled over one of the many hillocks. She then suddenly wrinkled up her little visage, and sent forth a full-breathed roar of sympathy and alarm.

And, really, this serious warning was more well-founded and had a more literal meaning than you might think; because the swinging gate led to the graveyard, and almost directly in little Pansie's path, there was a newly dug grave, ready to hold its occupant that afternoon. Pansie, however, ran on with her arms outstretched, half scared, half playing, moving her round little legs with amazing speed, as if trying to escape Time or Death, represented by Grandsir Dolliver, and happily dodging the ominous pitfall that everyone faces, until she heard a groan from her pursuer, looked back over her shoulder, and saw that poor grandpa had tripped over one of the many mounds. She then suddenly scrunched up her little face and let out a loud cry of sympathy and alarm.

"Grandpapa has broken his neck now!" cried little Pansie, amid her sobs.

"Grandpa has broken his neck now!" cried little Pansie through her tears.

"Kiss grandpapa, and make it well, then," said the old gentleman, recollecting her remedy, and scrambling up more readily than could be expected. "Well," he murmured to himself, "a hair's-breadth more, and I should have been tumbled into yonder grave. Poor little Pansie! what wouldst thou have done then?"

"Kiss Grandpa and make it better, then," said the old man, remembering her remedy and getting up more quickly than expected. "Well," he muttered to himself, "just a hair's breadth more, and I would have ended up in that grave over there. Poor little Pansie! What would you have done then?"

"Make the grass grow over grandpapa," answered Pansie, laughing up in his face.

"Make the grass grow over Grandpa," answered Pansie, laughing in his face.

"Poh, poh, child, that is not a pretty thing to say," said grandpapa, pettishly and disappointed, as people are apt to be when they try to calculate on the fitful sympathies of childhood. "Come, you must go in to old Martha now."

"Poh, poh, kid, that's not a nice thing to say," grandpapa replied, a bit annoyed and let down, like people often are when they try to figure out the unpredictable feelings of children. "Come on, you need to go inside to see old Martha now."

The poor old gentleman was in the more haste to leave the spot because he found himself standing right in front of his own peculiar row of gravestones, consisting of eight or nine slabs of slate, adorned with carved borders rather rudely cut, and the earliest one, that of his Bessie, bending aslant, because the frost of so many winters had slowly undermined it. Over one grave of the row, that of his gifted grandson, there was no memorial. He felt a strange repugnance, stronger than he had ever felt before, to linger by these graves, and had none of the tender sorrow mingled with high and tender hopes that had sometimes made it seem good to him to be there. Such moods, perhaps, often come to the aged, when the hardened earth-crust over their souls shuts them out from spiritual influences.

The poor old man was in more of a rush to leave the place because he found himself standing right in front of his own unique row of gravestones, made up of eight or nine slate slabs with rough carved edges, and the oldest one, that of his Bessie, was leaning to the side since the frost from so many winters had gradually weakened it. Over one grave in the row, that of his talented grandson, there was no marker. He felt a strange aversion, stronger than he had ever felt before, to linger by these graves, and he didn’t feel the tender sorrow mixed with high hopes that sometimes made it seem comforting to be there. These moods, perhaps, often come to the elderly, when the hardened exterior of their souls shuts them off from spiritual influences.

Taking the child by the hand,—her little effervescence of infantile fun having passed into a downcast humor, though not well knowing as yet what a dusky cloud of disheartening fancies arose from these green hillocks,—he went heavily toward the garden-gate. Close to its threshold, so that one who was issuing forth or entering must needs step upon it or over it, lay a small flat stone, deeply imbedded in the ground, and partly covered with grass, inscribed with the name of "Dr. John Swinnerton, Physician."

Taking the child by the hand—her usual bubbly energy of childhood had faded into a gloomy mood, though she didn't fully understand yet what dark, discouraging thoughts were coming from these green hills—he walked slowly toward the garden gate. Right at the threshold, so that anyone coming in or going out had to step on it or over it, there was a small flat stone, set deep in the ground and partly covered with grass, engraved with the name "Dr. John Swinnerton, Physician."

"Ay," said the old man, as the well-remembered figure of his ancient instructor seemed to rise before him in his grave-apparel, with beard and gold-headed cane, black velvet doublet and cloak, "here lies a man who, as people have thought, had it in his power to avoid the grave! He had no little grandchild to tease him. He had the choice to die, and chose it."

"Yeah," said the old man, as the familiar figure of his long-gone teacher appeared before him in his funeral clothes, with a beard and gold-headed cane, wearing a black velvet jacket and cloak, "here lies a guy who, as people believed, could have escaped death! He didn't have a little grandkid to bother him. He had the option to live and chose to die."

So the old gentleman led Pansie over[Pg 7] the stone, and carefully closed the gate; and, as it happened, he forgot the uprooted shrub, which Pansie, as she ran, had flung away, and which had fallen into the open grave; and when the funeral came that afternoon, the coffin was let down upon it, so that its bright, inauspicious flower never bloomed again.

So the old man led Pansie over[Pg 7] the stone and carefully closed the gate. He happened to forget the uprooted shrub that Pansie had thrown away as she ran, which ended up in the open grave. When the funeral took place that afternoon, the coffin was lowered onto it, ensuring that its bright, unfortunate flower would never bloom again.

FOOTNOTES:

[A] See July number, 1864, of this Magazine, for the first chapter of the story. The portion now published was not revised by the author, but is printed from his first draught.

[A] See the July issue from 1864 of this magazine for the first chapter of the story. The section published now was not revised by the author and is printed from his initial draft.


THE WIND OVER THE CHIMNEY.

Look, the fire is dying down,
Dusky red embers glow, While I still cower above them,—
I take a moment longer, Though the clock, with a raised finger, After midnight.
The charred log sings a tune. Learned in a distant June From a schoolboy at play,
When they were young together, Heart of youth and summer vibes Taking all their holiday.
And the night wind rising, listen!
How up there in the dark, In the middle of the night and the snow,
Ever wilder, fiercer, grander,
Like Iskander's trumpets,
All the noisy chimneys blow!
Every flickering flame Seems to whisper some important name,
It feels like it's telling me, "Aim high!"
But the night wind replies, "Hollow Are the visions you pursue,
"Your fire sinks into darkness!"
Then the flicker of the flame Shimmers on the books of the past,
Written by experts in the craft,
Loud through its majestic pages Timeless melody rolls,
Let the heartstrings resonate.
And once more the tongues of flame Start celebrating and shout,—
"These are prophets, poets, and visionaries;
In the nations' horoscope,
Like rising constellations,
"They control the future."[Pg 8]
But the night wind cries, "Despair!" Those who walk on air Leave no lasting marks;
At God's bright forges Loud hammers pound relentlessly,
These are just the flying sparks.
"Dust are all the hands that made;" Books are tombs of ideas; The dead laurels of the deceased Rustle for just a moment,
Like the dried-up leaves in solitude
Churchyards at some passing feet.
Suddenly the flame goes down; Stop the gossip about fame; And alone the cold night wind Clamors louder, wilder, vaguer,—
"It is the brand of Meleager
Dying on the hearth here!
And I reply, "Even if it is, Why should that bother me? No effort is in vain; Its reward lies in the doing,
And the thrill of chasing "Is the prize what the defeated receive?"

BETWEEN EUROPE AND ASIA.

"Drifting away from one shore and not yet arrived at the other." Russian Saying.

The railroad from Moscow to Nijni-Novgorod had been opened but a fortnight before. It was scarcely finished, indeed; for, in order to facilitate travel during the continuance of the Great Fair at the latter place, the gaps in the line, left by unbuilt bridges, were filled up with temporary trestle-work. The one daily express-train was so thronged that it required much exertion, and the freest use of the envoy's prestige, to secure a private carriage for our party. The sun was sinking over the low, hazy ridge of the Sparrow Hills as we left Moscow; and we enjoyed one more glimpse of the inexhaustible splendor of the city's thousand golden domes and pinnacles, softened by luminous smoke and transfigured dust, before the dark woods of fir intervened, and the twilight sank down on cold and lonely landscapes.

The train from Moscow to Nizhny Novgorod had just opened two weeks ago. It was barely finished, really; to make travel easier during the Great Fair at Nizhny Novgorod, the gaps in the line where bridges hadn’t been built yet were filled with temporary trestle work. The one daily express train was so crowded that it took a lot of effort and the envoy's connections to get a private carriage for our group. The sun was setting over the low, hazy hills of the Sparrow Hills as we left Moscow, and we got one last look at the endless beauty of the city's countless golden domes and spires, softened by glowing smoke and transformed dust, before the dark fir woods came between us and the twilight that fell on the cold, lonely landscapes.

Thence, until darkness, there was nothing more to claim attention. Whoever has seen one landscape of Central Russia is familiar with three fourths of the whole region. Nowhere else—not even on the levels of Illinois—are the same features so constantly reproduced. One long, low swell of earth succeeds to[Pg 9] another; it is rare that any other woods than birch and fir are seen; the cleared land presents a continuous succession of pasture, rye, wheat, potatoes, and cabbages; and the villages are as like as peas, in their huts of unpainted logs, clustering around a white church with five green domes. It is a monotony which nothing but the richest culture can prevent from becoming tiresome. Culture is to Nature what good manners are to man, rendering poverty of character endurable.

From then on, until nightfall, there was nothing else to grab attention. Anyone who has seen one landscape in Central Russia is familiar with three-quarters of the whole area. Nowhere else—not even in the flatlands of Illinois—are the same features so consistently repeated. One long, low rise of land follows another; it's rare to see woods other than birch and fir; the cleared land consists of a continuous stretch of pasture, rye, wheat, potatoes, and cabbages; and the villages are just as alike, with their huts made of unpainted logs, clustered around a white church topped with five green domes. It’s a monotony that only the richest culture can prevent from becoming tiresome. Culture is to Nature what good manners are to a person, making a lack of character bearable.

Stationing a servant at the door to prevent intrusion at the way-stations, we let down the curtains before our windows, and secured a comfortable privacy for the night, whence we issued only once, during a halt for supper. I entered the refreshment-room with very slender expectations, but was immediately served with plump partridges, tender cutlets, and green peas. The Russians made a rush for the great samovar (tea-urn) of brass, which shone from one end of the long table; and presently each had his tumbler of scalding tea, with a slice of lemon floating on the top. These people drink beverages of a temperature which would take the skin off Anglo-Saxon mouths. My tongue was more than once blistered, on beginning to drink after they had emptied their glasses. There is no station without its steaming samovar; and some persons, I verily believe, take their thirty-three hot teas between Moscow and St. Petersburg.

We stationed a servant at the door to keep out intruders at the way-stations, lowered the curtains at our windows, and secured a cozy privacy for the night, from which we only ventured out once for supper. I walked into the refreshment room with very low expectations, but was immediately served plump partridges, tender cutlets, and green peas. The Russians rushed to the large brass samovar (tea urn), which gleamed at one end of the long table; soon, each had a tumbler of scalding tea, with a slice of lemon floating on top. They drink their beverages at a temperature that would burn the skin off Anglo-Saxon mouths. I burned my tongue more than once after starting to drink once they had finished their glasses. There’s no station without its steaming samovar, and I honestly believe some people drink thirty-three hot teas between Moscow and St. Petersburg.

There is not much choice of dishes in the interior of Russia; but what one does get is sure to be tolerably good. Even on the Beresina and the Dnieper I have always fared better than at most of the places in our country where "Ten minutes for refreshments!" is announced day by day and year by year. Better a single beef-steak, where tenderness is, than a stalled ox, all gristle and grease. But then our cooking (for the public at least) is notoriously the worst in the civilized world; and I can safely pronounce the Russian better, without commending it very highly.

There aren't many dish options in central Russia, but what you do get is usually pretty good. Even on the Beresina and the Dnieper, I've always had better meals than at most places in our country where "Ten minutes for refreshments!" is announced over and over. A single tender steak is better than a tough, fatty old cow. But our cooking (at least for the public) is famously the worst in the civilized world, and I can confidently say the Russian food is better, though I wouldn’t praise it too highly.

Some time in the night we passed the large town of Vladimir, and with the rising sun were well on our way to the Volga. I pushed aside the curtains, and looked out, to see what changes a night's travel had wrought in the scenery. It was a pleasant surprise. On the right stood a large, stately residence, embowered in gardens and orchards; while beyond it, stretching away to the south-east, opened a broad, shallow valley. The sweeping hills on either side were dotted with shocks of rye; and their thousands of acres of stubble shone like gold in the level rays. Herds of cattle were pasturing in the meadows, and the peasants (serfs no longer) were straggling out of the villages to their labor in the fields. The crosses and polished domes of churches sparkled on the horizon. Here the patches of primitive forest were of larger growth, the trunks cleaner and straighter, than we had yet seen. Nature was half conquered, in spite of the climate, and, the first time since leaving St. Petersburg, wore a habitable aspect. I recognized some of the features of Russian country-life, which Puschkin describes so charmingly in his poem of "Eugene Onägin."

Some time during the night, we passed the big town of Vladimir, and with the rising sun, we were well on our way to the Volga. I pulled back the curtains and looked out to see what changes a night of travel had brought to the scenery. It was a pleasant surprise. To the right stood a large, impressive house surrounded by gardens and orchards; beyond it, stretching southeast, a wide, shallow valley opened up. The hills on either side were dotted with stacks of rye, and their thousands of acres of stubble gleamed like gold in the morning light. Herds of cattle were grazing in the meadows, and the peasants (no longer serfs) were making their way out of the villages to work in the fields. The crosses and shiny domes of churches sparkled on the horizon. Here, the patches of untamed forest were larger, with cleaner and straighter trunks than we had seen before. Nature seemed somewhat tamed, despite the climate, and for the first time since leaving St. Petersburg, it looked livable. I recognized some of the aspects of Russian rural life that Pushkin describes so beautifully in his poem "Eugene Onegin."

The agricultural development of Russia has been greatly retarded by the indifference of the nobility, whose vast estates comprise the best land of the empire, in those provinces where improvements might be most easily introduced. Although a large portion of the noble families pass their summers in the country, they use the season as a period of physical and pecuniary recuperation from the dissipations of the past, and preparation for those of the coming winter. Their possessions are so large (those of Count Scheremetieff, for instance, contain one hundred and thirty thousand inhabitants) that they push each other too far apart for social intercourse; and they consequently live en déshabillé, careless of the great national interests in their hands. There is a class of our Southern planters which seems to have adopted a very similar mode of life,—families which shabbily starve for ten months, in order to make[Pg 10] a lordly show at "the Springs" for the other two. A most accomplished Russian lady, the Princess D——, said to me,—"The want of an active, intelligent country society is our greatest misfortune. Our estates thus become a sort of exile. The few, here and there, who try to improve the condition of the people, through the improvement of the soil, are not supported by their neighbors, and lose heart. The more we gain in the life of the capital, the more we are oppressed by the solitude and stagnation of the life of the country."

The agricultural development of Russia has been significantly hindered by the indifference of the nobility, whose vast estates encompass the best land in the empire, particularly in provinces where improvements could be easily made. Even though many noble families spend their summers in the countryside, they use the season as a time to recover physically and financially from their past excesses and to gear up for the upcoming winter. Their estates are so large (for example, Count Scheremetieff's has about one hundred thirty thousand residents) that the distances between them make socializing difficult; as a result, they live in a careless manner, unconcerned with the important national issues that affect them. There is a group of Southern planters that seems to live in a very similar way—families that struggle financially for ten months just to put on a lavish display at "the Springs" for the other two. A highly educated Russian woman, Princess D——, told me, "The absence of an active, engaged country society is our greatest misfortune. Our estates essentially become a sort of exile. The few who attempt to improve the situation of the people by enhancing agricultural practices are not supported by their neighbors and become discouraged. The more we enjoy life in the capital, the more we feel weighed down by the isolation and stagnation of country life."

This open, cheerful region continued through the morning. The railroad was still a novelty; and the peasants everywhere dropped their scythes and shovels to see the train pass. Some bowed with the profoundest gravity. They were a fine, healthy, strapping race of men, only of medium height, but admirably developed in chest and limbs, and with shrewd, intelligent faces. Content, not stupidity, is the cause of their stationary condition. They are not yet a people, but the germ of one, and, as such, present a grand field for anthropological studies.

This open, cheerful area carried on through the morning. The railroad was still a new thing; and farmers all around paused their work to watch the train go by. Some bowed with the utmost seriousness. They were a strong, healthy group of men, average in height but well-built in their chests and limbs, with sharp, intelligent faces. Their stationary situation comes from contentment, not ignorance. They are not fully a people yet, but they have the potential to become one, and as such, they offer an excellent opportunity for anthropological research.

Towards noon the road began to descend, by easy grades, from the fair, rolling uplands into a lower and wilder region. When the train stopped, women and children whose swarthy skin and black eyes betrayed a mixture of Tartar blood made their appearance, with wooden bowls of cherries and huckleberries for sale. These bowls were neatly carved and painted. They were evidently held in high value; for I had great difficulty in purchasing one. We moved slowly, on account of the many skeleton bridges; but presently a long blue ridge, which for an hour past had followed us in the south-east, began to curve around to our front. I now knew that it must mark the course of the Oka River, and that we were approaching Nijni-Novgorod.

Towards noon, the road started to slope down gently from the beautiful, rolling hills into a more rugged area. When the train stopped, women and children with dark skin and black eyes, showing a blend of Tartar heritage, appeared with wooden bowls of cherries and huckleberries for sale. These bowls were well-crafted and painted, clearly treasured, as I had a hard time buying one. We moved slowly due to the many rickety bridges, but soon a long blue ridge that had been following us from the southeast for the past hour began to curve in front of us. I realized that it must indicate the path of the Oka River and that we were nearing Nijni-Novgorod.

We soon saw the river itself; then houses and gardens scattered along the slope of the hill; then clusters of sparkling domes on the summit; then a stately, white-walled citadel; and the end of the ridge was levelled down in an even line to the Volga. We were three hundred miles from Moscow, on the direct road to Siberia.

We quickly spotted the river; then houses and gardens spread out along the hill slope; then groups of shining domes at the top; then a grand, white-walled fortress; and the end of the ridge was flattened out in a straight line down to the Volga. We were three hundred miles from Moscow, on the straight route to Siberia.

The city being on the farther side of the Oka, the railroad terminates at the Fair, which is a separate city, occupying the triangular level between the two rivers. Our approach to it was first announced by heaps of cotton-bales, bound in striped camel's-hair cloth, which had found their way hither from the distant valleys of Turkestan and the warm plains of Bukharia. Nearly fifty thousand camels are employed in the transportation of this staple across the deserts of the Aral to Orenburg,—a distance of a thousand miles. The increase of price had doubled the production since the previous year, and the amount which now reaches the factories of Russia through this channel cannot be less than seventy-five thousand bales. The advance of modern civilization has so intertwined the interests of all zones and races, that a civil war in the United States affects the industry of Central Asia!

The city is on the far side of the Oka, where the railroad ends at the Fair, which is a separate city sitting on the triangular area between the two rivers. We first noticed it by the piles of cotton bales wrapped in striped camel's-hair cloth, which had come here from the distant valleys of Turkestan and the warm plains of Bukharia. Almost fifty thousand camels are used to transport this product across the deserts of the Aral to Orenburg—a journey of a thousand miles. The rise in prices has doubled production since last year, and the amount that now reaches the factories in Russia through this route is at least seventy-five thousand bales. The progress of modern civilization has connected the interests of all regions and races so much that a civil war in the United States impacts the industry of Central Asia!

Next to these cotton-bales, which, to us, silently proclaimed the downfall of that arrogant monopoly which has caused all our present woe, came the representatives of those who produced them. Groups of picturesque Asians—Bashkirs, Persians, Bukharians, and Uzbeks—appeared on either side, staring impassively at the wonderful apparition. Though there was sand under their feet, they seemed out of place in the sharp north-wind and among the hills of fir and pine.

Next to these cotton bales, which silently declared the downfall of the arrogant monopoly that has caused all our current suffering, stood the representatives of those who produced them. Groups of colorful Asians—Bashkirs, Persians, Bukharians, and Uzbeks—appeared on either side, looking expressionless at the remarkable sight. Even though there was sand beneath their feet, they seemed out of place in the biting north wind and among the fir and pine hills.

The train stopped: we had reached the station. As I stepped upon the platform, I saw, over the level lines of copper roofs, the dragon-like pinnacles of Chinese buildings, and the white minaret of a mosque. Here was the certainty of a picturesque interest to balance the uncertainty of our situation. We had been unable to engage quarters in advance: there were two hundred thousand strangers before us, in a city the normal population of which is barely forty thousand; and four of our party[Pg 11] were ladies. The envoy, indeed, might claim the Governor's hospitality; but our visit was to be so brief that we had no time to expend on ceremonies, and preferred rambling at will through the teeming bazaars to being led about under the charge of an official escort.

The train stopped: we had arrived at the station. As I stepped onto the platform, I saw, above the flat lines of copper roofs, the dragon-like peaks of Chinese buildings, and the white minaret of a mosque. Here was the assurance of an interesting view to offset the uncertainty of our situation. We had been unable to book accommodations in advance: there were two hundred thousand strangers ahead of us in a city where the usual population is only about forty thousand; and four of our group[Pg 11] were women. The envoy could indeed rely on the Governor's hospitality; however, our stay was going to be so short that we didn’t want to waste time on formalities, preferring to explore the bustling bazaars freely instead of being escorted by an official.

A friend at Moscow, however, had considerately telegraphed in our behalf to a French resident of Nijni, and the latter gentleman met us at the station. He could give but slight hope of quarters for the night, but generously offered his services. Droshkies were engaged to convey us to the old city, on the hill beyond the Oka; and, crowded two by two into the shabby little vehicles, we set forth. The sand was knee-deep, and the first thing that happened was the stoppage of our procession by the tumbling down of the several horses. They were righted with the help of some obliging spectators; and with infinite labor we worked through this strip of desert into a region of mud, with a hard, stony bottom somewhere between us and the earth's centre. The street we entered, though on the outskirts of the Fair, resembled Broadway on a sensation-day. It was choked with a crowd, composed of the sweepings of Europe and Asia. Our horses thrust their heads between the shoulders of Christians, Jews, Moslem, and Pagans, slowly shoving their way towards the floating bridge, which was a jam of vehicles from end to end. At the corners of the streets, the wiry Don Cossacks, in their dashing blue uniforms and caps of black lamb's-wool, regulated, as best they could, the movements of the multitude. It was curious to notice how they, and their small, well-knit horses,—the equine counterparts of themselves,—controlled the fierce, fiery life which flashed from every limb and feature, and did their duty with wonderful patience and gentleness. They seemed so many spirits of Disorder tamed to the service of Order.

A friend in Moscow had thoughtfully sent a telegram on our behalf to a French resident in Nijni, and the latter met us at the station. He couldn’t offer much hope for a place to stay for the night, but he generously offered to help us. We hired droshkies to take us to the old city, on the hill past the Oka, and squeezed two-by-two into the worn little vehicles as we set off. The sand was knee-deep, and the first thing that happened was that several horses stumbled and fell, stopping our procession. With the help of some kind onlookers, we got them back on their feet, and after a lot of effort, we worked our way through this sandy stretch into a muddy area, sitting on a hard, stony bottom that felt like it was miles below us. The street we entered, although on the edge of the Fair, was as crowded as Broadway on a busy day. It was packed with a mix of people from all over Europe and Asia. Our horses pushed their heads between the shoulders of Christians, Jews, Muslims, and Pagans, slowly making our way towards the floating bridge, which was jammed with vehicles from one end to the other. At the street corners, wiry Don Cossacks in their sharp blue uniforms and black lamb's-wool caps tried their best to manage the chaotic crowd. It was interesting to see how they, along with their small, well-built horses—like their equine counterparts—kept control over the wild, vibrant energy of the throng, all while performing their duties with great patience and kindness. They seemed like spirits of Chaos tamed for the sake of Order.

It was nearly half an hour before we reached the other end of the bridge, and struck the superb inclined highway which leads to the top of the hill. We were unwashed and hungry; and neither the tumult of the lower town, nor the view of the Volga, crowded with vessels of all descriptions, had power to detain us. Our brave little horses bent themselves to the task; for task it really was,—the road rising between three and four hundred feet in less than half a mile. Advantage has been taken of a slight natural ravine, formed by a short, curving spur of the hill, which encloses a pocket of the greenest and richest foliage,—a bit of unsuspected beauty, quite invisible from the other side of the river. Then, in order to reach the level of the Kremlin, the road is led through an artificial gap, a hundred feet in depth, to the open square in the centre of the city.

It took us almost half an hour to cross the bridge and hit the amazing steep road that takes you to the top of the hill. We were dirty and hungry, and neither the chaos of the lower town nor the view of the Volga filled with all kinds of boats could keep us there. Our brave little horses really pushed themselves to get us up, because it was a tough climb—the road went up between three and four hundred feet in less than half a mile. They made use of a small natural ravine created by a short, curving stretch of the hill, which holds a hidden spot of the greenest and most vibrant foliage—a little unexpected beauty that you can’t see from the other side of the river. Then, to get to the level of the Kremlin, the road takes us through an artificial gap that’s a hundred feet deep, leading into the open square in the center of the city.

Here, all was silent and deserted. There were broad, well-paved streets, substantial houses, the square towers and crenellated walls of the old Kremlin, and the glittering cupolas of twenty-six churches before us, and a lack of population which contrasted amazingly with the whirlpool of life below. Monsieur D., our new, but most faithful friend, took us to the hotel, every corner and cranny of which was occupied. There was a possibility of breakfast only, and water was obtained with great exertion. While we were lazily enjoying a tolerable meal, Monsieur D. was bestirring himself in all quarters, and came back to us radiant with luck. He had found four rooms in a neighboring street; and truly, if one were to believe De Custine or Dumas, such rooms are impossible in Russia. Charmingly clean, elegantly furnished, with sofas of green leather and beds of purest linen, they would hive satisfied the severe eye of an English housekeeper. We thanked both our good friend and St. Macarius (who presides over the Fair) for this fortune, took possession, and then hired fresh droshkies to descend the hill.

Here, everything was quiet and empty. There were wide, well-paved streets, solid houses, the square towers and battlement walls of the old Kremlin, and the shining domes of twenty-six churches in front of us, along with a noticeable lack of people, which stood in stark contrast to the bustling life below. Monsieur D., our new but very loyal friend, led us to the hotel, where every corner and cranny was filled. Only breakfast was available, and getting water took a lot of effort. While we were lazily enjoying a decent meal, Monsieur D. was busy all around town and returned to us beaming with success. He had found four rooms on a nearby street; and honestly, if you believed De Custine or Dumas, such rooms would seem impossible in Russia. They were charmingly clean, nicely furnished, with green leather sofas and beds made with the finest linen, and would have pleased even the most discerning English housekeeper. We thanked our good friend and St. Macarius (who oversees the Fair) for this stroke of luck, took our new rooms, and then hired fresh droshkies to go down the hill.

On emerging from the ravine, we obtained a bird's-eye view of the whole scene. The waters of both rivers, near at hand, were scarcely visible through the shipping which covered them. Vessels[Pg 12] from the Neva, the Caspian, and the rivers of the Ural, were here congregated; and they alone represented a floating population of between thirty and forty thousand souls. The Fair, from this point, resembled an immense flat city,—the streets of booths being of a uniform height,—out of which rose the great Greek church, the Tartar mosque, and the curious Chinese roofs. It was a vast, dark, humming plain, vanishing towards the west and north-west in clouds of sand. By this time there was a lull in the business, and we made our way to the central bazaar with less trouble than we had anticipated. It is useless to attempt an enumeration of the wares exposed for sale: they embraced everything grown, trapped, or manufactured, between Ireland and Japan. We sought, of course, the Asiatic elements, which first met us in the shape of melons from Astrachan, and grapes from the southern slopes of the Caucasus. Then came wondrous stuffs from the looms of Turkestan and Cashmere, turquoises from the Upper Oxus, and glittering strings of Siberian topaz and amethyst, side by side with Nuremberg toys, Lyons silks, and Sheffield cutlery. About one third of the population of the Fair was of Asiatic blood, embracing representatives from almost every tribe north and west of the Himalayas.

As we came out of the ravine, we got a bird's-eye view of the entire scene. The waters of both rivers nearby were barely visible through the ships that surrounded them. Vessels[Pg 12] from the Neva, the Caspian, and the rivers of the Ural were gathered here, representing a floating population of around thirty to forty thousand people. From this viewpoint, the Fair looked like a huge flat city, with rows of booths all at the same height, and rising above them were the grand Greek church, the Tartar mosque, and the unique Chinese roofs. It was a vast, dark, buzzing expanse that faded into clouds of sand to the west and northwest. By this time, the hustle and bustle had calmed down, and we made our way to the central bazaar with more ease than we expected. It's pointless to try and list all the goods for sale; they included everything grown, trapped, or made from Ireland to Japan. Naturally, we were looking for the Asian items, which first caught our eye with melons from Astrachan and grapes from the southern slopes of the Caucasus. Then there were amazing fabrics from the looms of Turkestan and Cashmere, turquoises from the Upper Oxus, and gleaming strings of Siberian topaz and amethyst, alongside Nuremberg toys, Lyons silks, and Sheffield cutlery. About a third of the Fair's population was of Asian descent, representing nearly every tribe north and west of the Himalayas.

This temporary city, which exists during only two months of the year, contained two hundred thousand inhabitants at the time of our visit. During the remaining ten months it is utterly depopulated, the bazaars are closed, and chains are drawn across the streets to prevent the passage of vehicles. A single statement will give an idea of its extent: the combined length of the streets is twenty-five miles. The Great Bazaar is substantially built of stone, after the manner of those in Constantinople, except that it encloses an open court, where a Government band performs every afternoon. Here the finer wares are displayed, and the shadowed air under the vaulted roofs is a very kaleidoscope for shifting color and sparkle. Tea, cotton, leather, wool, and the other heavier and coarser commodities, have their separate streets and quarters. The several nationalities are similarly divided, to some extent; but the stranger, of course, prefers to see them jostling together in the streets,—a Babel, not only of tongues, but of feature, character, and costume.

This temporary city, which only exists for two months each year, had two hundred thousand residents when we visited. For the other ten months, it’s completely deserted, the markets are closed, and chains are pulled across the streets to stop vehicles from passing through. One statement sums up its size: the total length of the streets is twenty-five miles. The Great Bazaar is well-built from stone, similar to those in Istanbul, except it has an open courtyard where a government band plays every afternoon. Here, the finer goods are showcased, and the shaded air under the arched roofs creates a vibrant display of color and sparkle. Tea, cotton, leather, wool, and other bulkier, rougher products each have their own streets and areas. The various nationalities are somewhat separated as well; however, tourists usually enjoy seeing them mingling in the streets—a mix not only of languages but also of appearances, personalities, and clothing.

Our ladies were eager to inspect the stock of jewelry, especially those heaps of exquisite color with which the Mohammedans very logically load the trees of Paradise; for they resemble fruit in a glorified state of existence. One can imagine virtuous grapes promoted to amethysts, blueberries to turquoises, cherries to rubies, and green-gages to aqua-marine. These, the secondary jewels, (with the exception of the ruby,) are brought in great quantities from Siberia, but most of them are marred by slight flaws or other imperfections, so that their cheapness is more apparent than real. An amethyst an inch long, throwing the most delicious purple light from its hundreds of facets, quite takes you captive, and you put your hand in your pocket for the fifteen dollars which shall make you its possessor; but a closer inspection is sure to show you either a broad transverse flaw, or a spot where the color fades into transparency. The white topaz, known as the "Siberian diamond," is generally flawless, and the purest specimens are scarcely to be distinguished from the genuine brilliant. A necklace of these, varying from a half to a quarter of an inch in diameter, may be had for about twenty-five dollars. There were also golden and smoky topaz and beryl, in great profusion.

Our ladies were excited to check out the jewelry, especially those colorful piles that the Muslims logically hang on the trees of Paradise; they look like fruit in an elevated state. You can imagine virtuous grapes turned into amethysts, blueberries into turquoises, cherries into rubies, and green-gages into aquamarines. These secondary gems (except for the ruby) come in large amounts from Siberia, but most have slight flaws or other imperfections, making their low price feel more obvious than it really is. An inch-long amethyst, casting stunning purple light from its many facets, totally captures you, and you reach into your pocket for the fifteen dollars that will make it yours; but a closer look usually reveals either a noticeable flaw across it or a spot where the color fades to clear. The white topaz, called the "Siberian diamond," is typically flawless, and the best pieces are nearly indistinguishable from real diamonds. A necklace of these, ranging from half to a quarter of an inch in diameter, can be bought for about twenty-five dollars. There were also plenty of golden and smoky topaz and beryl.

A princely Bashkir drew us to his booth, first by his beauty and then by his noble manners. He was the very incarnation of Boker's "Prince Adeb."

A handsome Bashkir prince attracted us to his booth, first with his good looks and then with his royal demeanor. He was the perfect embodiment of Boker's "Prince Adeb."

The girls from Damar stopped to watch me walk by,
I'm walking in my rags, but I still look beautiful.
One young woman said, 'He has the demeanor of a prince!' I’m a prince; the air belonged to me completely.

This Bashkir, however, was not in rags; he was elegantly attired. His silken vest was bound with a girdle of gold-thread[Pg 13] studded with jewels; and over it he wore a caftan, with wide sleeves, of the finest dark-blue cloth. The round cap of black lamb's-wool became his handsome head. His complexion was pale olive, through which the red of his cheeks shone, in the words of some Oriental poem, "like a rose-leaf through oil"; and his eyes, in their dark fire, were more lustrous than smoky topaz. His voice was mellow and musical, and his every movement and gesture a new revelation of human grace. Among thousands, yea, tens of thousands, of handsome men, he stood preëminent.

This Bashkir, however, wasn't in rags; he was dressed elegantly. His silk vest was secured with a gold-thread belt studded with jewels; over it, he wore a caftan with wide sleeves made of the finest dark-blue fabric. The round cap of black lamb’s wool suited his attractive head. His complexion was a pale olive, with the red of his cheeks shining, as some Oriental poem describes, "like a rose-leaf through oil"; and his eyes, with their dark sparkle, were more brilliant than smoky topaz. His voice was rich and melodic, and every movement and gesture revealed a new level of human grace. Among thousands, even tens of thousands, of handsome men, he stood out as the most distinguished.

As our acquaintance ripened, he drew a pocket-book from his bosom, and showed us his choicest treasures: turquoises, bits of wonderful blue heavenly forget-me-nots; a jacinth, burning like a live coal, in scarlet light; and lastly, a perfect ruby, which no sum less than twenty-five hundred dollars could purchase. From him we learned the curious fluctuations of fashion in regard to jewels. Turquoises were just then in the ascendant; and one of the proper tint, the size of a parsnip-seed, could not be had for a hundred dollars, the full value of a diamond of equal size. Amethysts of a deep plum-color, though less beautiful than the next paler shade, command very high prices; while jacinth, beryl, and aqua-marine—stones of exquisite hue and lustre—are cheap. But then, in this department, as in all others, Fashion and Beauty are not convertible terms.

As our friendship grew, he took out a wallet from his chest and showed us his prized possessions: turquoises, which were like beautiful little blue forget-me-nots; a jacinth, glowing like a live ember in red light; and finally, a flawless ruby, worth no less than twenty-five hundred dollars. From him, we learned about the strange changes in jewel fashion. At that time, turquoises were really popular; and one of the right color, about the size of a parsnip seed, couldn't be found for less than a hundred dollars, which was the full price of a diamond of the same size. Deep plum-colored amethysts, although not as beautiful as the lighter shade, fetch very high prices; while jacinth, beryl, and aquamarine—stones with stunning colors and shine—are affordable. But, as in many things, Fashion and Beauty don't always mean the same thing.

In the next booth there were two Persians, who unfolded before our eyes some of those marvellous shawls, where you forget the barbaric pattern in the exquisite fineness of the material and the triumphant harmony of the colors. Scarlet with palm-leaf border,—blue clasped by golden bronze, picked out with red,—browns, greens, and crimsons struggling for the mastery in a war of tints,—how should we choose between them? Alas! we were not able to choose: they were a thousand dollars apiece! But the Persians still went on unfolding, taking our admiration in pay for their trouble, and seeming even, by their pleasant smiles, to consider themselves well paid. When we came to the booths of European merchants, we were swiftly impressed with the fact that civilization, in following the sun westward, loses its grace in proportion as it advances. The gentle dignity, the serene patience, the soft, fraternal, affectionate demeanor of our Asiatic brethren vanished utterly when we encountered French and German salesmen; and yet these latter would have seemed gracious and courteous, had there been a few Yankee dealers beyond them. The fourth or fifth century, which still exists in Central Asia, was undoubtedly, in this particular, superior to the nineteenth. No gentleman, since his time, I suspect, has equalled Adam.

In the next booth, there were two Persians who displayed some of those incredible shawls that make you forget the bold patterns because of the exquisite quality of the fabric and the stunning color combinations. There were rich scarlet ones with palm-leaf borders, deep blues accented with golden bronze and red, and a mix of browns, greens, and crimsons battling for attention in a vibrant clash of colors—how could we choose between them? Unfortunately, we couldn't make a choice: they were a thousand dollars each! But the Persians kept showcasing their shawls, accepting our admiration as payment for their efforts, and even seeming, with their friendly smiles, to feel well compensated. When we reached the booths of European merchants, we quickly realized that as civilization moves westward, it loses its charm the further it goes. The gentle elegance, calm patience, and warm, brotherly kindness of our Asian counterparts completely disappeared when we encountered French and German salesmen; yet, the latter would have seemed gracious and polite if there had been a few American dealers after them. The fourth or fifth century, still present in Central Asia, was certainly superior in this regard to the nineteenth. No gentleman, I believe, has matched Adam since then.

Among these Asiatics Mr. Buckle would have some difficulty in maintaining his favorite postulate, that tolerance is the result of progressive intelligence. It is also the result of courtesy, as we may occasionally see in well-bred persons of limited intellect. Such, undoubtedly, is the basis of that tolerance which no one who has had much personal intercourse with the Semitic races can have failed to experience. The days of the sword and fagot are past; but it was reserved for Christians to employ them in the name of religion alone. Local or political jealousies are at the bottom of those troubles which still occur from time to time in Turkey: the traveller hears no insulting epithet, and the green-turbaned Imam will receive him as kindly and courteously as the sceptical Bey educated in Paris. I have never been so aggressively assailed, on religious grounds, as at home,—never so coarsely and insultingly treated, on account of a presumed difference of opinion, as by those who claim descent from the Cavaliers. The bitter fierceness of some of our leading reformers is overlooked by their followers, because it springs from "earnest conviction"; but in the Orient intensest faith coexists with the most gracious and gentle manners.[Pg 14]

Among these Asians, Mr. Buckle would struggle to maintain his favorite idea that tolerance is a result of growing intelligence. It’s also a product of politeness, as we can sometimes see in well-mannered individuals with limited intellect. This is undoubtedly the foundation of the tolerance that anyone who has had significant personal interactions with Semitic groups must have experienced. The days of violence and persecution are over; however, it was Christians who notably used them in the name of religion alone. Local or political rivalries are behind the occasional issues that arise in Turkey: travelers hear no insulting terms, and the green-turbaned Imam will greet them as warmly and courteously as the skeptical Bey educated in Paris. I've never faced such aggressive attacks on religious grounds as I have at home—nor been treated as coarsely and insultingly because of a presumed difference of opinion than by those who claim descent from the Cavaliers. The intense bitterness of some of our leading reformers is ignored by their followers because it comes from "earnest conviction"; yet in the East, deep faith coexists with exceptionally gracious and gentle manners.[Pg 14]

Be not impatient, beloved reader; for this digression brings me naturally to the next thing we saw at Novgorod. As we issued from the bazaar, the sunlit minaret greeted us through whirling dust and rising vapor, and I fancied I could hear the muezzin's musical cry. It was about time for the asser prayer. Droshkies were found, and we rode slowly through the long, low warehouses of "caravan tea" and Mongolian wool to the mound near the Tartar encampment. The mosque was a plain, white, octagonal building, conspicuous only through its position. The turbaned faithful were already gathering; and we entered, and walked up the steps among them, without encountering an unfriendly glance. At the door stood two Cossack soldiers, specially placed there to prevent the worshippers from being insulted by curious Christians. (Those who have witnessed the wanton profanation of mosques in India by the English officers will please notice this fact.) If we had not put off our shoes before entering the hall of worship, the Cossacks would have performed that operation for us.

Don’t be impatient, dear reader; this digression naturally leads me to the next thing we saw in Novgorod. As we left the bazaar, the sunlit minaret welcomed us through swirling dust and rising vapor, and I thought I could hear the muezzin’s melodic call. It was around the time for the asser prayer. We found some droshkies and rode slowly through the long, low warehouses filled with "caravan tea" and Mongolian wool to the mound near the Tartar camp. The mosque was a simple, white, octagonal building, noticeable only because of its location. The turbaned worshippers were already gathering; we entered and walked up the steps among them without encountering any unfriendly looks. At the door stood two Cossack soldiers, specifically assigned to prevent worshippers from being bothered by curious Christians. (Those who have seen the careless disrespect of mosques in India by English officers will take note of this.) If we hadn’t taken off our shoes before entering the worship area, the Cossacks would have done it for us.

I am happy to say that none of our party lacked a proper reverence for devotion, though it was offered through the channels of an alien creed. The ladies left their gaiters beside our boots, and we all stood in our stockings on the matting, a little in the rear of the kneeling crowd. The priest occupied a low dais in front, but he simply led the prayer, which was uttered by all. The windows were open, and the sun poured a golden flood into the room. Yonder gleamed the Kremlin of Novgorod, yonder rolled the Volga, all around were the dark forests of the North,—yet their faces were turned, and their thoughts went southward, to where Mecca sits among the burning hills, in the feathery shade of her palm-trees. And the tongue of Mecca came from their lips, "Allah!" "Allah akhbar!" as the knee bent and the forehead touched the floor.

I’m glad to say that everyone in our group showed proper respect for the devotion, even though it came from a different faith. The women left their shoes next to our boots, and we all stood in our socks on the matting, a bit behind the kneeling crowd. The priest was on a low platform in front, but he simply led the prayer, which everyone recited together. The windows were open, and sunlight streamed into the room. Over there shone the Kremlin of Novgorod, over there flowed the Volga, and around us were the dark forests of the North—but their faces were turned, and their thoughts were directed south, to where Mecca lies among the burning hills, in the airy shade of palm trees. And the words of Mecca came from their lips, "Allah!" "Allah akhbar!" as they bent their knees and touched their foreheads to the floor.

At the second repetition of the prayers we quietly withdrew; and good Monsieur D., forgetful of nothing, suggested that preparations had been made for a dinner in the great cosmopolitan restaurant. So we drove back again through the Chinese street, with its red horned houses, the roofs terminating in gilded dragons' tails, and, after pressing through a dense multitude enveloped in tobacco-smoke and the steam of tea-urns, found ourselves at last in a low room with a shaky floor and muslin ceiling. It was an exact copy of the dining-room of a California hotel. If we looked blank a moment, Monsieur D.'s smile reassured us. He had given all the necessary orders, he said, and would step out and secure a box in the theatre before the zakouski was served. During his absence, we looked out of the window on either side upon surging, whirling, humming pictures of the Great Fair, all vanishing in perspectives of dust and mist.

At the second round of prayers, we quietly stepped away; and good Monsieur D., not forgetting anything, suggested that preparations were ready for dinner at the large international restaurant. So we drove back through the Chinese street, with its red horned houses, the roofs ending in gilded dragons’ tails, and after pushing through a dense crowd filled with tobacco smoke and steaming tea urns, we finally found ourselves in a small room with a wobbly floor and a muslin ceiling. It was exactly like the dining room of a hotel in California. If we looked a bit confused for a moment, Monsieur D.'s smile reassured us. He had taken care of all the necessary arrangements, he said, and would step out to secure a box at the theater before the zakouski was served. While he was gone, we looked out of the window on either side at the bustling, swirling, vibrant scenes of the Great Fair, all fading into perspectives of dust and mist.

In half an hour our friend returned, and with him entered the zakouski. I cannot remember half the appetizing ingredients of which it was composed: anchovies, sardines, herrings, capers, cheese, caviare, paté de foie, pickles, cherries, oranges, and olives, were among them. Instead of being a prelude to dinner, it was almost a dinner in itself. Then, after a Russian soup, which always contains as much solid nutriment as meat-biscuit or Arctic pemmican, came the glory of the repast, a mighty sterlet, which was swimming in Volga water when we took our seats at the table. This fish, the exclusive property of Russia, is, in times of scarcity, worth its weight in silver. Its unapproachable flavor is supposed to be as evanescent as the hues of a dying dolphin. Frequently, at grand dinner-parties, it is carried around the table in a little tank, and exhibited, alive, to the guests, when their soup is served, that its freshness, ten minutes afterwards, may be put beyond suspicion. The fish has the appearance of a small, lean sturgeon; but its flesh resembles the melting pulp of a fruit rather than the fibre of its watery brethren. It sinks into juice upon the tongue, like a perfectly ripe peach. In this quality no other[Pg 15] fish in the world can approach it; yet I do not think the flavor quite so fine as that of a brook-trout. Our sterlet was nearly two feet long, and may have cost twenty or thirty dollars.

In half an hour, our friend returned, bringing with him a platter of zakouski. I can't remember half of the delicious ingredients it included: anchovies, sardines, herring, capers, cheese, caviar, paté de foie, pickles, cherries, oranges, and olives were all part of it. Instead of being just an appetizer for dinner, it was practically a meal on its own. After that, we had a Russian soup, which always has as much solid nutrition as meat biscuits or Arctic pemmican, followed by the highlight of the meal, a magnificent sterlet, which had been swimming in Volga water when we sat down at the table. This fish, uniquely Russian, is worth its weight in silver during times of scarcity. Its unmatched flavor is said to be as fleeting as the colors of a dying dolphin. Often, at grand dinner parties, it is brought around the table in a small tank and shown to the guests, alive, while they have their soup so that its freshness can be confirmed just ten minutes later. The fish looks like a small, lean sturgeon, but its flesh is more like the soft pulp of a fruit than the muscle of other fish. It melts into juice on the tongue, like a perfectly ripe peach. No other[Pg 15] fish in the world can compare to this quality; yet I still think the flavor isn’t quite as good as that of a brook trout. Our sterlet was nearly two feet long and probably cost twenty or thirty dollars.

With it appeared an astonishing salad, composed of watermelons, cantaloupes, pickled cherries, cucumbers, and certain spicy herbs. Its color and odor were enticing, and we had all applied the test of taste most satisfactorily before we detected the curious mixture of ingredients. After the second course,—a ragout of beef, accompanied with a rich, elaborate sauce,—three heavy tankards of chased silver, holding two quarts apiece, were placed upon the table. The first of these contained kvass, the second kislischi, and the third hydromel. Each one of these national drinks, when properly brewed, is very palatable and refreshing. I found the kislischi nearly identical with the ancient Scandinavian mead: no doubt it dates from the Varangian rule in Russia. The old custom of passing the tankards around the table, from mouth to mouth, is still observed, and will not be found objectionable, even in these days of excessive delicacy, when ladies and gentlemen are seated alternately at the banquet.

With it came an amazing salad made from watermelons, cantaloupes, pickled cherries, cucumbers, and some spicy herbs. Its color and smell were tempting, and we all found it pretty tasty before we noticed the unusual mix of ingredients. After the second course—a beef stew with a rich, fancy sauce—three heavy silver tankards, each holding two quarts, were placed on the table. The first one contained kvass, the second kislischi, and the third hydromel. Each of these national drinks, when brewed correctly, is very enjoyable and refreshing. I found the kislischi almost the same as the ancient Scandinavian mead; it probably dates back to the Varangian rule in Russia. The old custom of passing the tankards around the table, from person to person, is still followed and won't be seen as inappropriate, even in these times of excessive delicacy, when ladies and gentlemen are seated alternately at the banquet.

The Russian element of the dinner here terminated. Cutlets and roast fowls made their appearance, with bottles of Rüdesheimer and Lafitte, followed by a dessert of superb Persian melons, from the southern shore of the Caspian Sea.

The Russian part of the dinner was over. Cutlets and roasted chickens were served, along with bottles of Rüdesheimer and Lafitte, followed by an incredible dessert of exquisite Persian melons from the southern shore of the Caspian Sea.

By this time night had fallen, and Monsieur D. suggested an immediate adjournment to the theatre. What should be the entertainment? Dances of almehs, songs of gypsies, or Chinese jugglers? One of the Ivans brought a programme. It was not difficult to decipher the word "МАКБЕТЪ," and to recognize, further, in the name of "Ira Aldridge" a distinguished mulatto tragedian, to whom Maryland has given birth (if I am rightly informed) and Europe fame. We had often heard of him, yea, seen his portrait in Germany, decorated with the orders conferred by half a dozen sovereigns; and his presence here, between Europe and Asia, was not the least characteristic feature of the Fair. A mulatto Macbeth, in a Russian theatre, with a Persian and Tartar audience!

By this time, night had fallen, and Monsieur D. suggested we head to the theater. What should the entertainment be? Dances from almehs, songs from gypsies, or Chinese jugglers? One of the Ivans brought a program. It was easy to make out the word "МАКБЕТЪ," and to recognize "Ira Aldridge" as a distinguished mulatto actor, born in Maryland (if I’m not mistaken) and famous in Europe. We had often heard of him, even seen his portrait in Germany, adorned with honors from several monarchs; his presence here, between Europe and Asia, was a striking highlight of the Fair. A mulatto Macbeth, in a Russian theater, with a Persian and Tartar audience!

On arriving, we were ushered into two whitewashed boxes, which had been reserved for our party. The manager, having been informed of the envoy's presence in Nijni-Novgorod, had delayed the performance half an hour, but the audience bore this infliction patiently. The building was deep and narrow, with space for about eight hundred persons, and was filled from top to bottom. The first act was drawing to a close as we entered. King Duncan, with two or three shabby attendants, stood in the court-yard of the castle,—the latter represented by a handsome French door on the left, with a bit of Tartar wall beyond,—and made his observations on the "pleasant seat" of Macbeth's mansion. He spoke Russian, of course. Lady Macbeth now appeared, in a silk dress of the latest fashion, expanded by the amplest of crinolines. She was passably handsome, and nothing could be gentler than her face and voice. She received the royal party like a well-bred lady, and they all entered the French door together.

Upon arrival, we were shown to two whitewashed rooms that had been set aside for our group. The manager, having been notified of the envoy's arrival in Nijni-Novgorod, postponed the performance by half an hour, but the audience handled the wait with patience. The venue was deep and narrow, accommodating about eight hundred people, and it was packed from top to bottom. The first act was nearing its end as we walked in. King Duncan, accompanied by two or three scruffy attendants, stood in the courtyard of the castle—the latter was represented by a stylish French door on the left, with a piece of Tartar wall behind it—and commented on the "pleasant seat" of Macbeth's home. He spoke in Russian, of course. Lady Macbeth then appeared, wearing a silk dress in the latest fashion, enhanced by the widest of crinolines. She was quite attractive, and her face and voice were the epitome of gentleness. She welcomed the royal party like a well-mannered lady, and they all entered through the French door together.

There was no change of scene. With slow step and folded arms, Ira Macbeth entered and commenced the soliloquy, "If it were done," etc., to our astonishment, in English! He was a dark, strongly built mulatto, of about fifty, in a fancy tunic, and light stockings over Forrestian calves. His voice was deep and powerful; and it was very evident that Edmund Kean, once his master, was also the model which he carefully followed in the part. There were the same deliberate, over-distinct enunciation, the same prolonged pauses and gradually performed gestures, as I remember in imitations of Kean's manner. Except that the copy was a little too apparent, Mr. Aldridge's acting was really very fine. The Russians were enthusiastic in their applause, though very[Pg 16] few of them, probably, understood the language of the part. The Oriental auditors were perfectly impassive, and it was impossible to guess how they regarded the performance.

There was no change of scene. With a slow walk and arms crossed, Ira Macbeth entered and began the soliloquy, "If it were done," etc., to our surprise, in English! He was a tall, solidly built man of mixed race, around fifty years old, wearing a fancy tunic and light stockings over strong calves. His voice was deep and powerful, and it was clear that Edmund Kean, who had once been his mentor, was also the role model he was closely following. There was the same deliberate, overly clear speech, the same long pauses, and the gradually performed gestures that I remember from imitations of Kean's style. Even though the imitation was a bit too obvious, Mr. Aldridge's acting was genuinely very impressive. The Russians were enthusiastic in their applause, although very[Pg 16] few of them probably understood the language of the part. The Eastern audience was completely indifferent, making it impossible to guess what they thought of the performance.

The second act was in some respects the most amusing thing I ever saw upon the stage. In the dagger-scene, Ira was, to my mind, quite equal to Forrest; it was impossible to deny him unusual dramatic talent; but his complexion, continually suggesting Othello, quite confounded me. The amiable Russian Lady Macbeth was much better adapted to the part of Desdemona: all softness and gentleness, she smiled as she lifted her languishing eyes, and murmured in the tenderest accents, "Infirm of purpose! give me the dagger!" At least, I took it for granted that these were her words, for Macbeth had just said, "Look on 't again I dare not." Afterwards, six Russian soldiers, in tan-colored shirts, loose trousers, and high boots, filed in, followed by Macduff and Malcolm, in the costume of Wallenstein's troopers. The dialogue—one voice English, and all the others Russian—proceeded smoothly enough, but the effect was like nothing which our stage can produce. Nevertheless, the audience was delighted, and when the curtain fell there were vociferous cries of "Aïra! Aïra! Aldreetch! Aldreetch!" until the swarthy hero made his appearance before the foot-lights.

The second act was, in some ways, the funniest thing I've ever seen on stage. In the dagger scene, Ira was, in my opinion, just as good as Forrest; it was impossible to deny he had exceptional dramatic talent. However, his complexion, which constantly reminded me of Othello, completely confused me. The charming Russian Lady Macbeth was much better suited for the role of Desdemona: all softness and gentleness, she smiled as she lifted her weary eyes and murmured in the sweetest tones, "Infirm of purpose! Give me the dagger!" At least, I assumed those were her words since Macbeth had just said, "Look on 't again I dare not." Later, six Russian soldiers wearing tan shirts, loose trousers, and high boots came in, followed by Macduff and Malcolm, dressed like Wallenstein's troops. The dialogue—one voice in English and all the others in Russian—flowed smoothly enough, but the effect was unlike anything our stage can create. Still, the audience loved it, and when the curtain fell, there were loud shouts of "Aïra! Aïra! Aldreetch! Aldreetch!" until the dark-skinned hero appeared before the footlights.

Monsieur D. conducted our friend P. into the green-room, where he was received by Macbeth in costume. He found the latter to be a dignified, imposing personage, who carried his tragic chest-tones into ordinary conversation. On being informed by P. that the American minister was present, he asked,—

Monsieur D. took our friend P. into the green room, where he was greeted by Macbeth in costume. He found Macbeth to be a dignified and impressive figure, who brought his dramatic voice into everyday conversation. When P. told him that the American minister was present, he asked,—

"Of what persuasion?"

"What’s your stance?"

P. hastened to set him right, and Ira then remarked, in his gravest tone,—"I shall have the honor of waiting upon him to-morrow morning"; which, however, he failed to do.

P. hurried to correct him, and Ira then said, in his most serious tone, "I will have the honor of visiting him tomorrow morning"; which, however, he did not do.

This son of the South, no doubt, came legitimately (or, at least, naturally) by his dignity. His career, for a man of his blood and antecedents, has been wonderfully successful, and is justly due, I am convinced, since I have seen him, to his histrionic talents. Both black and yellow skins are sufficiently rare in Europe to excite a particular interest in those who wear them; and I had surmised, up to this time, that much of his popularity might be owing to his color. But he certainly deserves an honorable place among tragedians of the second rank.

This Southern guy definitely earned his dignity, whether by birth or just naturally. His career has been incredibly successful for someone with his background, and I truly believe, based on what I've seen, that it's largely because of his acting talent. Both black and Asian individuals are pretty rare in Europe, which sparks special interest in them; until now, I thought a lot of his popularity came from his skin color. But he definitely deserves a respected spot among second-tier actors.

We left the theatre at the close of the third act, and crossed the river to our quarters on the hill. A chill mist hung over the Fair, but the lamps still burned, the streets were thronged, and the Don Cossacks kept patient guard at every corner. The night went by like one unconscious minute, in beds unmolested by bug or flea; and when I arose, thoroughly refreshed, I involuntarily called to mind a frightful chapter in De Custine's "Russia," describing the prevalence of an insect which he calls the persica, on the banks of the Volga. He was obliged to sleep on a table, the legs whereof were placed in basins of water, to escape their attacks. I made many inquiries about these terrible persicas, and finally discovered that they were neither more nor less than—cockroaches!—called Prossaki (Prussians) by the Russians, as they are sometimes called Schwaben (Suabians) by the Germans. Possibly they may be found in the huts of the serfs, but they are rare in decent houses.

We left the theater at the end of the third act and crossed the river to our place on the hill. A chilly mist hung over the Fair, but the lights were still on, the streets were crowded, and the Don Cossacks kept a patient watch at every corner. The night passed like a blink, in beds free from bugs or fleas; when I woke up feeling completely refreshed, I couldn’t help but remember a horrifying chapter in De Custine's "Russia," which describes an insect he calls the persica along the Volga River. He had to sleep on a table with its legs placed in basins of water to avoid their bites. I asked a lot of questions about these terrible persicas and finally found out they were nothing more than—cockroaches!—referred to as Prossaki (Prussians) by the Russians, as they are sometimes called Schwaben (Swabians) by the Germans. They might be found in the huts of the serfs, but they're rare in decent homes.

We devoted the first sunny hours of the morning to a visit to the citadel and a walk around the crest of the hill. On the highest point, just over the junction of the two rivers, there is a commemorative column to Minim, the patriotic butcher of Novgorod, but for whose eloquence, in the year 1610, the Russian might possibly now be the Polish Empire. Vladislas, son of Sigismund of Poland, had been called to the throne by the boyards, and already reigned in Moscow, when Minim appealed to the national spirit, persuaded General Pojarski to head an anti-Polish movement, which was successful, and thus cleared the way for the election of Michael[Pg 17] Romanoff, the first sovereign of the present dynasty. Minim is therefore one of the historic names of Russia.

We spent the first sunny hours of the morning visiting the citadel and walking around the hilltop. At the highest point, right over where the two rivers meet, stands a memorial column to Minim, the patriotic butcher of Novgorod. Without his persuasive speaking skills, in 1610, Russia might very well be part of the Polish Empire today. Vladislas, son of Sigismund of Poland, had been invited to the throne by the boyars and was already ruling in Moscow when Minim rallied the national spirit and convinced General Pojarski to lead an anti-Polish movement, which succeeded. This cleared the way for the election of Michael[Pg 17] Romanoff, the first ruler of the current dynasty. Therefore, Minim is one of the historic figures in Russia.

When I stood beside his monument, and the finest landscape of European Russia was suddenly unrolled before my eyes, I could believe the tradition of his eloquence, for here was its inspiration. Thirty or forty miles away stretched the rolling swells of forest and grain-land, fading into dimmest blue to the westward and northward, dotted with villages and sparkling domes, and divided by shining reaches of the Volga. It was truly a superb and imposing view, changing with each spur of the hill as we made the circuit of the citadel. Eastward, the country rose into dark, wooded hills, between which the river forced its way in a narrower and swifter channel, until it disappeared behind a purple headland, hastening southward to find a warmer home in the unfrozen Caspian. By embarking on the steamers anchored below us, we might have reached Perm, among the Ural Mountains, or Astrachan, in less than a week; while a trip of ten days would have taken us past the Caucasus, even to the base of Ararat or Demavend. Such are the splendid possibilities of travel in these days.

When I stood next to his monument and the beautiful landscape of European Russia suddenly unfolded before me, I could easily believe the stories about his eloquence, as this was its source of inspiration. Thirty or forty miles away, rolling hills of forest and farmland stretched out, fading into a light blue to the west and north, dotted with villages and shining domes, and separated by the glistening stretches of the Volga. It was truly a magnificent and striking view, changing with each rise of the hill as we circled the citadel. To the east, the land rose into dark, wooded hills, where the river pushed through in a narrower and faster channel, eventually disappearing behind a purple headland, racing southward to find a warmer resting place in the unfrozen Caspian. By boarding the steamers anchored below us, we could have reached Perm, near the Ural Mountains, or Astrachan, in less than a week; while a ten-day trip could have taken us past the Caucasus, all the way to the foot of Ararat or Demavend. Such are the amazing travel opportunities in these times.

The envoy, who visited Europe for the first time, declared that this panorama from the hill of Novgorod was one of the finest things he had seen. There could, truly, be no better preparation to enjoy it than fifteen hundred miles of nearly unbroken level, after leaving the Russian frontier; but I think it would be a "show" landscape anywhere. Why it is not more widely celebrated I cannot guess. The only person in Russia whom I heard speak of it with genuine enthusiasm was Alexander II.

The ambassador, who was visiting Europe for the first time, said that the view from the hill of Novgorod was one of the best things he had ever seen. Honestly, there couldn’t be a better way to appreciate it than after traveling fifteen hundred miles of almost flat terrain from the Russian border; however, I think it would be a stunning landscape no matter where you saw it. I can't understand why it isn't more famous. The only person in Russia I heard talk about it with real excitement was Alexander II.

Two hours upon the breezy parapet, beside the old Tartar walls, were all too little; but the droshkies waited in the river-street a quarter of a mile below us, our return to Moscow was ordered for the afternoon, there were amethysts and Persian silks yet to be bought, and so we sighed farewell to an enjoyment rare in Russia, and descended the steep footpath.

Two hours on the breezy balcony by the old Tartar walls were hardly enough; but the carriages were waiting in the river street a quarter of a mile below us, our return to Moscow was scheduled for the afternoon, there were still amethysts and Persian silks to buy, so we sighed goodbye to a rare pleasure in Russia and went down the steep footpath.

P. and I left the rest of the party at the booth of the handsome Bashkir, and set out upon a special mission to the Tartar camp. I had ascertained that the national beverage of Central Asia might be found there,—the genuine koumiss, or fermented milk of the mares of the Uralian steppes. Having drunk palm-wine in India, sam-shoo China, saki in Japan, pulque in Mexico, bouza in Egypt, mead in Scandinavia, ale in England, bock-bier in Germany, mastic in Greece, calabogus in Newfoundland, and—soda-water in the United States, I desired to complete the bibulous cosmos, in which koumiss was still lacking. My friend did not share my curiosity, but was ready for an adventure, which our search for mare's milk seemed to promise.

P. and I left the rest of the party at the booth of the attractive Bashkir and set off on a special mission to the Tartar camp. I had found out that the national drink of Central Asia could be found there—the real koumiss, or fermented mare's milk from the Uralian steppes. After having tried palm wine in India, sam-shoo in China, saki in Japan, pulque in Mexico, bouza in Egypt, mead in Scandinavia, ale in England, bock-bier in Germany, mastic in Greece, calabogus in Newfoundland, and—soda water in the United States, I wanted to complete my collection of drinks, which still needed koumiss. My friend wasn’t as curious as I was, but he was up for an adventure, and our search for mare's milk seemed to promise that.

Beyond the mosques we found the Uzbeks and Kirghiz,—some in tents, some in rough shanties of boards. But they were without koumiss: they had had it, and showed us some empty kegs, in evidence of the fact. I fancied a gleam of diversion stole over their grave, swarthy faces, as they listened to our eager inquiries in broken Russian. Finally we came into an extemporized village, where some women, unveiled and ugly, advised us to apply to the traders in the khan, or caravansera. This was a great barn-like building, two stories high, with broken staircases and creaking floors. A corridor ran the whole length of the second floor, with some twenty or thirty doors opening into it from the separate rooms of the traders. We accosted the first Tartar whom we met; and he promised, with great readiness, to procure us what we wanted. He ushered us into his room, cleared away a pile of bags, saddles, camel-trappings, and other tokens of a nomadic life, and revealed a low divan covered with a ragged carpet. On a sack of barley sat his father, a blind graybeard, nearly eighty years old. On our way through the camp I had noticed that the Tartars saluted each other with the Arabic, "Salaam aleikoom!" and[Pg 18] I therefore greeted the old man with the familiar words. He lifted his head: his face brightened, and he immediately answered, "Aleikoom salaam, my son!"

Beyond the mosques, we found the Uzbeks and Kirghiz—some in tents, others in makeshift shacks made of wood. But they had no koumiss; they showed us some empty barrels as proof. I thought I saw a hint of amusement on their serious, dark faces as they listened to our eager questions in broken Russian. Eventually, we came to an improvised village, where some unveiled, unattractive women suggested we ask the traders in the khan, or caravanserai. This was a large barn-like building, two stories tall, with broken staircases and creaking floors. A corridor ran along the entire length of the second floor, with twenty or thirty doors opening into it from the individual traders' rooms. We approached the first Tartar we encountered, and he readily promised to get us what we needed. He led us into his room, cleared away a pile of bags, saddles, camel gear, and other signs of a nomadic lifestyle, revealing a low divan covered with a worn carpet. His father, a blind old man nearly eighty years old, was sitting on a sack of barley. On our way through the camp, I had noticed that the Tartars greeted each other with the Arabic phrase, "Salaam aleikoom!" So I greeted the old man with those familiar words. He lifted his head, his face lit up, and he immediately responded, "Aleikoom salaam, my son!"

"Do you speak Arabic?" I asked.

"Do you speak Arabic?" I asked.

"A little; I have forgotten it," said he. "But thine is a new voice. Of what tribe art thou?"

"A bit; I've forgotten it," he said. "But yours is a new voice. What tribe are you from?"

"A tribe far away, beyond Bagdad and Syria," I answered.

"A tribe far away, beyond Baghdad and Syria," I replied.

"It is the tribe of Damascus. I know it now, my son. I have heard the voice, many, many years ago."

"It’s the tribe of Damascus. I recognize it now, my son. I heard the voice many, many years ago."

The withered old face looked so bright, as some pleasant memory shone through it, that I did not undeceive the man. His son came in with a glass, pulled a keg from under a pile of coarse caftans, and drew out the wooden peg. A gray liquid, with an odor at once sour and pungent, spirted into the glass, which he presently handed to me, filled to the brim. In such cases no hesitation is permitted. I thought of home and family, set the glass to my lips, and emptied it before the flavor made itself clearly manifest to my palate.

The withered old face looked so bright, as if a nice memory was shining through it, that I didn't correct the man. His son came in with a glass, pulled a keg from under a pile of rough coats, and removed the wooden stopper. A gray liquid, with a sour and strong smell, squirted into the glass, which he quickly handed to me, filled to the top. In these situations, there's no room for hesitation. I thought of home and family, brought the glass to my lips, and downed it before the taste fully registered.

"Well, what is it like?" asked my friend, who curiously awaited the result of the experiment.

"Well, what's it like?" asked my friend, who was eagerly waiting for the outcome of the experiment.

"Peculiar," I answered, with preternatural calmness,—"peculiar, but not unpleasant."

"Peculiar," I replied, with an unusual calmness, — "peculiar, but not unpleasant."

The glass was filled a second time; and P., not to be behindhand, emptied it at a draught. Then he turned to me with tears (not of delight) in his eyes, swallowed nothing very hard two or three times, suppressed a convulsive shudder, and finally remarked, with the air of a martyr, "Very curious, indeed!"

The glass was filled again; and P., eager to keep up, downed it in one go. Then he turned to me with tears (not of joy) in his eyes, gulped a few times as if something was stuck, held back a shudder, and finally said, with the demeanor of a martyr, "Very interesting, indeed!"

"Will your Excellencies have some more?" said the friendly Tartar.

"Would you like some more?" asked the friendly Tartar.

"Not before breakfast, if you please," I answered; "your koumiss is excellent, however, and we will take a bottle with us,"—which we did, in order to satisfy the possible curiosity of the ladies. I may here declare that the bottle was never emptied.

"Not before breakfast, if you don't mind," I replied; "your koumiss is really good, though, and we'll take a bottle with us,"—which we did, to satisfy any curiosity the ladies might have. I should mention that the bottle was never finished.

The taste was that of aged buttermilk mixed with ammonia. We could detect no flavor of alcohol, yet were conscious of a light exhilaration from the small quantity we drank. The beverage is said, indeed, to be very intoxicating. Some German physician has established a "koumiss-cure" at Piatigorsk, at the northern base of the Caucasus, and invites invalids of certain kinds to come and be healed by its agency. I do not expect to be one of the number.

The taste was like old buttermilk mixed with ammonia. We couldn't taste any alcohol, but we felt a slight buzz from the small amount we drank. This drink is said to be quite intoxicating. A German doctor has set up a "koumiss-cure" in Piatigorsk, at the northern base of the Caucasus, and invites certain patients to come and be healed by it. I don’t expect to be one of them.

There still remained a peculiar feature of the Fair, which I had not yet seen. This is the subterranean network of sewerage, which reproduces, in massive masonry, the streets on the surface. Without it, the annual city of two months would become uninhabitable. The peninsula between the two rivers being low and marshy,—frequently overflowed during the spring freshets,—pestilence would soon be bred from the immense concourse of people: hence a system of cloacæ, almost rivalling those of ancient Rome. At each street-corner there are wells containing spiral staircases, by which one can descend to the spacious subterranean passages, and there walk for miles under arches of hewn stone, lighted and aired by shafts at regular intervals. In St. Petersburg you are told that more than half the cost of the city is under the surface of the earth; at Nijni-Novgorod the statement is certainly true. Peter the Great at one time designed establishing his capital here. Could he have foreseen the existence of railroads, he would certainly have done so. Nijni-Novgorod is now nearer to Berlin than the Russian frontier was fifty years ago. St. Petersburg is an accidental city; Nature and the destiny of the empire are both opposed to its existence; and a time will come when its long lines of palaces shall be deserted for some new capital, in a locality at once more southern and more central.

There was still one unusual feature of the Fair that I hadn’t seen yet. It's the underground sewer system, which, with its large stonework, mirrors the streets above. Without it, the city that pops up for two months each year would become unlivable. The low and marshy peninsula between the two rivers often floods during spring, which would quickly lead to disease with so many people around. That’s why there’s a system of cloacæ that nearly rivals those of ancient Rome. At every street corner, there are wells with spiral staircases leading down to spacious underground passages, where you can walk for miles under stone arches, illuminated and ventilated by shafts at regular intervals. In St. Petersburg, they say that over half the cost of the city is below ground; this is definitely true for Nijni-Novgorod. At one point, Peter the Great thought about making his capital here. If he had known about railroads, he probably would have done it. Nijni-Novgorod is now closer to Berlin than the Russian border was fifty years ago. St. Petersburg is an accidental city; both Nature and the fate of the empire are against its existence, and there will come a time when its long rows of palaces will be abandoned for a new capital in a place that is both more southern and more central.

Another walk through the streets of the Fair enabled me to analyze the first confused impression, and separate the motley throng of life into its several elements. I shall not attempt, however, to catch and paint its ever-changing, fluctuating character. Our limited visit[Pg 19] allowed us to see only the more central and crowded streets. Outside of these, for miles, extend suburbs of iron, of furs, wool, and other coarser products, brought together from the Ural, from the forests towards the Polar Ocean, and from the vast extent of Siberia. Here, from morning till night, the beloved kvass flows in rivers, the strong stream of shchi (cabbage-soup) sends up its perpetual incense, and the samovar of cheap tea is never empty. Here, although important interests are represented, the intercourse between buyers and sellers is less grave and methodical than in the bazaar. There are jokes, laughter, songs, and a constant play of that repartee in which even the serfs are masters. Here, too, jugglers and mountebanks of all sorts ply their trade; gypsies sing, dance, and tell fortunes; and other vocations, less respectable than these, flourish vigorously. For, whether the visitor be an Ostiak from the Polar Circle, an Uzbek from the Upper Oxus, a Crim-Tartar or Nogaï, a Georgian from Tiflis, a Mongolian from the Land of Grass, a Persian from Ispahan, a Jew from Hamburg, a Frenchman from Lyons, a Tyrolese, Swiss, Bohemian, or an Anglo-Saxon from either side of the Atlantic, he meets his fellow-visitors to the Great Fair on the common ground, not of human brotherhood, but of human appetite; and all the manifold nationalities succumb to the same allurements. If the various forms of indulgence could be so used as to propagate ideas, the world would speedily be regenerated; but as things go, "cakes and ale" have more force than the loftiest ideas, the noblest theories of improvement; and the impartial observer will make this discovery as readily at Nijni-Novgorod as anywhere else.

Another stroll through the Fair’s streets helped me unpack my initial, jumbled impression and break the lively crowd down into its different parts. I won’t try to capture the constantly changing, shifting vibe. Our brief visit[Pg 19] let us only explore the busier, central thoroughfares. Beyond these, for miles, lie suburbs filled with iron, furs, wool, and other rough goods sourced from the Urals, the forests near the Polar Ocean, and the vast stretches of Siberia. Here, from morning to night, the much-loved kvass flows in abundance, the hearty stream of shchi (cabbage soup) sends up its constant aroma, and the samovar of inexpensive tea is always filled. Although significant interests are represented here, the interaction between buyers and sellers feels less serious and structured compared to the bazaar. There are jokes, laughter, songs, and an ongoing exchange of banter where even the serfs excel. Here, too, jugglers and street performers showcase their talents; gypsies sing, dance, and tell fortunes, while other less reputable trades thrive. Whether the visitor is an Ostiak from the Polar Circle, an Uzbek from the Upper Oxus, a Crimean Tatar or Nogaï, a Georgian from Tiflis, a Mongolian from the Land of Grass, a Persian from Ispahan, a Jew from Hamburg, a Frenchman from Lyons, a Tyrolean, a Swiss, a Bohemian, or an Anglo-Saxon from either side of the Atlantic, they all meet fellow attendees at the Great Fair on the common ground of human desire, not brotherhood; and all these diverse nationalities fall for the same temptations. If various forms of indulgence could be directed to spread ideas, the world would quickly transform; but as things stand, "cakes and ale" hold more sway than the grandest ideals or noble theories of progress. An unbiased observer will notice this just as easily at Nijni-Novgorod as anywhere else.

Before taking leave of the Fair, let me give a word to the important subject of tea. It is a much-disputed question with the connoisseurs of that beverage which neither cheers nor inebriates, (though, I confess, it is more agreeable than koumiss,) whether the Russian "caravan tea" is really superior to that which is imported by sea. After much patient observation, combined with serious reflection, I incline to the opinion that the flavor of tea depends, not upon the method of transportation, but upon the price paid for the article. I have tasted bad caravan tea in Russia, and delicious tea in New York. In St. Petersburg you cannot procure a good article for less than three roubles ($2.25, gold) per pound; while the finer kinds bring twelve and even sixteen roubles. Whoever is willing to import at that price can no doubt procure tea of equal excellence. The fact is, that this land-transportation is slow, laborious, and expensive; hence the finer kinds of tea are always selected, a pound thereof costing no more for carriage than a pound of inferior quality; whence the superior flavor of caravan tea. There is, however, one variety to be obtained in Russia which I have found nowhere else, not even in the Chinese sea-ports. It is called "imperial tea", and comes in elegant boxes of yellow silk emblazoned with the dragon of the Hang dynasty, at the rate of from six to twenty dollars a pound. It is yellow, and the decoction from it is almost colorless. A small pinch of it, added to ordinary black tea, gives an indescribably delicious flavor,—the very aroma of the tea-blossom; but one cup of it, unmixed, is said to deprive the drinker of sleep for three nights. We brought some home, and a dose thereof was administered to three unconscious guests during my absence; but I have not yet ascertained the effects which followed.

Before leaving the Fair, let me say a few words about the important topic of tea. It's a highly debated issue among tea enthusiasts—which beverage neither cheers nor intoxicates—(though, I’ll admit, it’s more enjoyable than koumiss), whether Russian "caravan tea" is genuinely better than the kind imported by sea. After observing and reflecting on this for some time, I tend to believe that the taste of tea is determined, not by how it’s transported, but by the price you pay for it. I’ve had bad caravan tea in Russia and amazing tea in New York. In St. Petersburg, you can’t get a decent tea for less than three roubles ($2.25, gold) per pound, while the higher quality ones go for twelve and even sixteen roubles. Anyone willing to import at that price can undoubtedly find tea of equal quality. The reality is that land transportation is slow, labor-intensive, and costly; as a result, the finer types of tea are always chosen, costing the same for shipping as a pound of inferior tea; whence the superior taste of caravan tea. However, there is one type you can find in Russia that I haven’t seen anywhere else, not even in Chinese seaports. It’s called "imperial tea," and it comes in beautiful boxes of yellow silk adorned with the dragon of the Hang dynasty, priced between six to twenty dollars a pound. It's yellow, and the brew from it is almost colorless. A small pinch added to regular black tea gives an incredibly delicious flavor—the essence of the tea blossom; but just one cup of it, on its own, is said to keep the drinker awake for three nights. We brought some back home, and a dose of it was given to three unsuspecting guests during my absence; however, I still haven’t found out what happened afterward.

Monsieur D. brought our last delightful stroll through the glittering streets to an untimely end. The train for Moscow was to leave at three o'clock; and he had ordered an early dinner at the restaurant. By the time this was concluded, it was necessary to drive at once to the station, in order to secure places. We were almost too late; the train, long as it was, was crammed to overflowing; and although both station-master and conductor assisted us, the eager passengers disregarded their authority. With great difficulty, one compartment[Pg 20] was cleared for the ladies; in the adjoining one four merchants, in long caftans, with sacks of watermelons as provision for the journey, took their places, and would not be ejected. A scene of confusion ensued, in which station-master, conductor, Monsieur D., my friend P., and the Russian merchants were curiously mixed; but when we saw the sacks of watermelons rolling out of the door, we knew the day was ours. In two minutes more we were in full possession; the doors were locked, and the struggling throngs beat against them in vain.

Monsieur D. abruptly ended our last enjoyable walk through the sparkling streets. The train to Moscow was set to leave at three o'clock, and he had reserved an early dinner at the restaurant. By the time we finished eating, we had to rush to the station to get seats. We were nearly too late; the train, though long, was packed to capacity, and even though the station master and conductor tried to help us, the eager passengers ignored their authority. With a lot of effort, one compartment[Pg 20] was cleared for the ladies; in the next one, four merchants in long caftans with sacks of watermelons as their snacks settled in and refused to leave. A chaotic scene followed, with the station master, conductor, Monsieur D., my friend P., and the Russian merchants all jumbled together; but when we saw the sacks of watermelons rolling out of the door, we knew we had won. Just two minutes later, we had full control of the compartment; the doors were locked, and the struggling crowd banged against them in vain.

With a grateful farewell to our kind guide, whose rather severe duties for our sake were now over, we moved away from the station, past heaps of cotton-bales, past hills of drifting sand, and impassive groups of Persians, Tartars, and Bukharians, and slowly mounted the long grade to the level of the upland, leaving the Fair to hum and whirl in the hollow between the rivers, and the white walls and golden domes of Novgorod to grow dim on the crest of the receding hill.

With a thankful goodbye to our kind guide, whose strict responsibilities for us were finally done, we walked away from the station, past piles of cotton bales, hills of drifting sand, and motionless groups of Persians, Tartars, and Bukharians, and slowly ascended the long slope to the elevated land, leaving the Fair to buzz and swirl in the valley between the rivers, and the white walls and golden domes of Novgorod to fade from view on the top of the retreating hill.

The next morning, at sunrise, we were again in Moscow.

The next morning, at sunrise, we were back in Moscow.


MY AUTUMN WALK.

In woodlands glowing with autumn The golden sunlight shines; I admire the beauty around me,
And tears fill my eyes.
For the wind that blows through the meadows
Blows out from the far Southwest,
Where our brave men are fighting,
And the brave who died are at peace.
The goldenrod is leaning And the purple aster sways
In a wind from the land of conflicts,
A breath from the graveyard.
Leaves are falling rapidly. Before that wandering breath; As quick as lightning on the battlefield,
Our brothers fall in death.
Beautiful along my path The forest spoils are discarded;
They are noticing the grassy hills. With purple, gold, and red.
Beautiful is the eternal rest
Of those who boldly fight In their nation's holy conflict,
And die for what's right.
[Pg 21]
But who will comfort the living,
The light from their homes is gone:
The bride, who was widowed early, Hearts broken;
The matron, whose sons are lying In graves on a faraway shore; The maiden, whose betrothed fiancé Doesn't come back from the war anymore?
I gaze at the tranquil homes
Whose windows shine in sight,
With a small farm, garden, and orchard That enjoy the soft light;
And I know that when our couriers With news of victory comes,
They will deliver a harsh message
Of deep sorrow to some.
Once more, I look to the forests,
And shiver as I see
The mock-grape's blood-red banner Chilled on the cedar tree;
And I remember the days of killing,
And the night sky glowing red with flames,
On the Chattahoochee's meadows, And the neglected banks of the James.
Oh, for the fresh spring season,
When the groves are flourishing,
And far off in the future It's frosty autumn!
Oh, for that better time,
When the enemy's pride gives way,
And the beings of God and freedom Return from the hard-fought battlefield;
And the matron will hold her first-born close. With tears of joy and pride; And the lover marked by scars and battles
Will claim his promised bride!
The leaves are blown off the branches; But the living buds are present,
With folded flower and leaves,
To grow in a gentler environment.

October, 1864.

October 1864.

FOOTNOTES:

[B] Ampelopsis, mock-grape. I have here literally translated the botanical name of the Virginia creeper,—an appellation too cumbrous for verse.

[B] Ampelopsis, mock-grape. I've translated the botanical name of the Virginia creeper directly, as its name is too unwieldy for poetry.


FIVE-SISTERS COURT AT CHRISTMAS-TIDE.

For a business street Every Lane certainly is very lazy. It sets out just to make a short passage between two thoroughfares, but, though forced first to walk straight by the warehouses that wall in its entrance, it soon begins to loiter, staring down back alleys, yawning into courts, plunging into stable-yards, and at length standing irresolute at three ways of getting to the end of its journey. It passes by artisans' shops, and keeps two or three masons' cellars and carpenters' lofts, as if its slovenly buildings needed perpetual repairs. It has not at all the air of once knowing better days. It began life hopelessly; and though the mayor and common council and board of aldermen, with ten righteous men, should daily march through it, the broom of official and private virtue could not sweep it clean of its slovenliness. But one of its idle turnings does suddenly end in a virtuous court: here Every Lane may come, when it indulges in vain aspirations for a more respectable character, and take refuge in the quiet demeanor of Every Court. The court is shaped like the letter T with an L to it. The upright beam connects it with Every Lane, and maintains a non-committal character, since its sides are blank walls; upon one side of the cross-beam are four houses, while a fifth occupies the diminutive L of the court, esconcing itself in a snug corner, as if ready to rush out at the cry of "All in! all in!" Gardens fill the unoccupied sides, toy-gardens, but large enough to raise all the flowers needed for this toy-court. The five houses, built exactly alike, are two and a half stories high, and have each a dormer-window, curtained with white dimity, so that they look like five elderly dames in caps; and the court has gotten the name of Five-Sisters Court, to the despair of Every Lane, which felt its sole chance for respectability slip away when the court came to disown its patronymic.

For a business street, Every Lane is definitely very lazy. It starts out just as a shortcut between two main roads, but despite having to walk straight past the warehouses that block its entrance, it quickly starts to linger, checking out back alleys, yawning into courtyards, and diving into stable-yards, eventually hesitating at three different paths to reach its destination. It passes by artisans' shops and includes a couple of masons' cellars and carpenters' lofts, as if its shabby buildings required constant repairs. It doesn’t look like it ever had better days. It started off hopelessly; and even if the mayor and city council, along with ten righteous men, marched through it every day, neither official nor personal virtue could make it tidy up its messiness. But one of its aimless turns unexpectedly leads to a nice courtyard: here, Every Lane can come when it dreams of having a more respectable image and find solace in the calm presence of Every Court. The court is shaped like a letter T with an L attached. The vertical part connects it to Every Lane, maintaining a vague nature since its sides are just blank walls; on one side of the crossbar are four houses, while a fifth nestles in the little L of the court, ready to spring out at the call of "All in! all in!" Gardens fill the empty sides, small gardens, but enough to grow all the flowers needed for this tiny court. The five houses, which are all identical, stand two and a half stories tall and each has a dormer window, curtained with white dimity, making them look like five elderly women in bonnets; the court has been named Five-Sisters Court, much to the despair of Every Lane, which felt its only chance for respectability slipping away when the court decided to distance itself from its name.

It was at dusk, the afternoon before Christmas, that a young man, Nicholas Judge by name, walking inquiringly down Every Lane, turned into Five-Sisters Court, and stood facing the five old ladies, apparently in some doubt as to which he should accost. There was a number on each door, but no name; and it was impossible to tell from the outside who or what sort of people lived in each. If one could only get round to the rear of the court, one might get some light, for the backs of houses are generally off their guard, and the Five Sisters who look alike in their dimity caps might possibly have more distinct characters when not dressed for company. Perhaps, after the caps are off, and the spectacles removed—But what outrageous sentiments are we drifting toward!

It was dusk, the evening before Christmas, when a young man named Nicholas Judge, curiously walking down Every Lane, turned into Five-Sisters Court and stood before the five elderly ladies, seemingly unsure of who to approach. Each door had a number but no name, making it impossible to figure out who lived there just by looking from the outside. If only he could get to the back of the court, he might gain some clarity, since the backs of houses are usually more relaxed, and the Five Sisters, who looked alike in their patterned caps, might show more distinct personalities when not dressed for visitors. Maybe, after they took off their caps and glasses—But what ridiculous thoughts are we getting into!

There was a cause for Nicholas Judge's hesitation. In one of those houses he had good reason to believe lived an aunt of his, the only relation left to him in the world, so far as he knew, and by so slender a thread was he held to her that he knew only her maiden name. Through the labyrinth of possible widowhoods, one of which at least was actual, and the changes in condition which many years would effect, he was to feel his way to the Fair Rosamond by this thread. Nicholas was a wise young man, as will no doubt appear when we come to know him better, and, though a fresh country youth, visiting the city for the first time, was not so indiscreet as to ask bluntly at each door, until he got satisfaction, "Does my Aunt Eunice live here?" As the doors in the court were all shut and equally dumb, he resolved to take the houses in order, and proposing to himself the strategy of asking for a drink of water, and so opening the way for further parley, he stood before the door of Number One.

There was a reason for Nicholas Judge's hesitation. In one of those houses, he had good reason to believe lived an aunt of his, the only relative he had left in the world, as far as he knew, and he was so loosely connected to her that he only knew her maiden name. Through the maze of possible widowhoods—one of which was definitely real—and the changes that many years would bring, he was to find his way to the Fair Rosamond by this thread. Nicholas was a wise young man, as will undoubtedly become clear when we get to know him better, and, although a fresh country youth visiting the city for the first time, he wasn’t so foolish as to bluntly ask at each door, until he got an answer, "Does my Aunt Eunice live here?" Since the doors in the court were all shut and completely silent, he decided to approach the houses in order. Planning to ask for a drink of water to open the door for further conversation, he stood before the door of Number One.

He raised the knocker, (for there was no bell,) and tapped in a hesitating manner, as if he would take it all back in[Pg 23] case of an egregious mistake. There was a shuffle in the entry; the door opened slowly, disclosing an old and tidy negro woman, who invited Nicholas in by a gesture, and saying, "You wish to see master?" led him on through a dark passage without waiting for an answer. "Certainly," he thought, "I want to see the master more than I want a drink of water: I will keep that device for the next house"; and, obeying the lead of the servant, he went up stairs, and was ushered into a room, where there was just enough dusky light to disclose tiers of books, a table covered with papers, and other indications of a student's abode.

He raised the knocker, since there was no bell, and tapped nervously, as if he could take it all back in[Pg 23] case he had made a terrible mistake. There was a shuffle in the entryway; the door opened slowly, revealing an elderly, neat black woman who gestured for Nicholas to come in and asked, "Do you want to see the master?" without waiting for a response. "Definitely," he thought, "I want to see the master more than I want a drink of water: I'll save that excuse for the next place." Following the servant, he went upstairs and was led into a room, where there was just enough dim light to reveal rows of books, a table covered with papers, and other signs of a scholar's home.

Nicholas's eye had hardly become accustomed to the dim light, when there entered the scholar himself, the master whom he was to see: a small old man, erect, with white hair and smooth forehead, beneath which projected two beads of eyes, that seemed, from their advanced position, endeavoring to take in what lay round the corner of the head as well as objects directly in front. His long palm-leaved study-gown and tasselled velvet cap lent him a reverend appearance; and he bore in his hand what seemed a curiously shaped dipper, as if he were some wise man coming to slake a disciple's thirst with water from the fountain-head of knowledge.

Nicholas had barely adjusted to the dim light when the scholar himself walked in, the very master he was meant to meet: a small, old man, upright with white hair and a smooth forehead, beneath which sat two prominent eyes that seemed to be trying to see around the corners of his head as well as what was directly in front of him. His long, palm-patterned gown and tasseled velvet cap gave him a dignified look; in his hand, he held what appeared to be a strangely shaped dipper, as if he were a wise man coming to quench a disciple's thirst with water from the source of knowledge.

"Has he guessed my pretended errand?" wondered Nicholas to himself, feeling a little ashamed of his innocent ruse, for he was not in the least thirsty; but the old man began at once to address him, after motioning him to a seat. He spoke abruptly, and with a restrained impatience of manner:—

"Has he figured out my fake excuse?" Nicholas thought to himself, feeling a bit embarrassed about his harmless trick, since he wasn’t even thirsty. But the old man immediately started talking to him after gesturing for him to sit down. He spoke directly and with a noticeable impatience:—

"So you received my letter appointing this hour for an interview. Well, what do you expect me to do for you? You compliment me, in a loose sort of way, on my contributions to philological science, and tell me that you are engaged in the same inquiries with myself"—

"So you got my letter setting up this time for an interview. Well, what do you want me to do for you? You kind of compliment me on my work in linguistics and say that you’re involved in the same research I am."

"Sir," said Nicholas, in alarm,—"I ought to explain myself,—I"——

"Sir," Nicholas said, alarmed, "I need to explain myself—I"

But the old gentleman gave no heed to the interruption, and continued:——

But the old gentleman paid no attention to the interruption and kept going:——

—"And that you have published an article on the Value of Words. You sent me the paper, but I didn't find anything in it. I have no great opinion of the efforts of young men in this direction. It contained commonplace generalities which I never heard questioned. You can't show the value of words by wasting them. I told you I should be plain. Now you want me to give you some hints, you say, as to the best method of pursuing philological researches. In a hasty moment I said you might come, though I don't usually allow visitors. You praise me for what I have accomplished in philology. Young man, that is because I have not given myself up to idle gadding and gossiping. Do you think, if I had been making calls, and receiving anybody who chose to force himself upon me, during the last forty years, that I should have been able to master the digamma, which you think my worthiest labor?"

—"So you published an article on the Value of Words. You sent me the paper, but I didn't find anything in it. I don’t have a high opinion of the efforts of young people in this area. It was filled with ordinary ideas that I’ve never heard questioned. You can't prove the value of words by wasting them. I told you I would be straightforward. Now, you say you want me to give you some tips on the best way to pursue language studies. In a moment of weakness, I said you could come over, even though I don’t usually allow visitors. You commend me for what I’ve achieved in linguistics. Young man, that’s because I haven’t wasted my time on trivial socializing and gossip. Do you really think that if I had been making visits and welcoming anyone who wanted to drop by these past forty years, I would have managed to master the digamma, which you think is my most valuable work?"

"Sir," interrupted Nicholas again, thinking that the question, though it admitted no answer, might give him a chance to stand on his own legs once more, "I really must ask your pardon."

"Sir," Nicholas interjected again, believing that the question, even though it didn’t require an answer, might give him an opportunity to support himself once more, "I truly must ask for your pardon."

"The best method of pursuing philological researches!" continued the old scholar, deaf to Nicholas's remonstrance. "That is one of your foolish general questions, that show how little you know what you are about. But do as I have done. Work by yourself, and dig, dig. Give up your senseless gabbling in the magazines, get over your astonishment at finding that cœlum and heaven contain the same idea etymologically, and that there was a large bread-bakery at Skōlos, and make up your mind to believe nothing till you can't help it. You haven't begun to work yet. Wait till you have lived as I have, forty years in one house, with your library likely to turn you out of doors, and only an old black woman to speak to, before you begin to think of calling yourself a scholar. Eh?"

"The best way to do philological research!" continued the old scholar, ignoring Nicholas's objections. "That’s one of those silly general questions that shows how little you really understand. But do what I did. Work on your own and keep digging. Stop your pointless chatter in the magazines, get over your shock at realizing that cœlum and heaven share the same idea etymologically, and that there was a big bakery in Skōlos. Decide to believe nothing until you can't avoid it. You haven't really started working yet. Wait until you've lived like I have, for forty years in one house, with your library threatening to kick you out, and only an old black woman to talk to, before you call yourself a scholar. Right?"

And at this point the old gentleman adjusted the dipper, which was merely an ear-trumpet,—though for a moment[Pg 24] more mysterious to Nicholas, in its new capacity, than when he had regarded it as a unique specimen of a familiar household-implement,—and thrust the bowl toward the embarrassed youth. In fact, having said all that he intended to say to his unwelcome supposed disciple, he showed enough churlish grace to permit him to make such reply or defence as seemed best.

And at this point, the old man adjusted the dipper, which was just an ear trumpet—though for a moment[Pg 24] it seemed more mysterious to Nicholas in its new role than when he had seen it as a unique example of a common household tool—and pushed the bowl toward the awkward young man. In fact, having said everything he wanted to say to his unwelcome supposed pupil, he showed enough rude kindness to let him respond or defend himself as he thought best.

The old gentleman had pulled up so suddenly in his harangue, and called for an answer so authoritatively, and with such a singular flourish of his trumpet, that Nicholas, losing command of the studied explanation of his conduct, which a moment before had been at his tongue's end, caught at the last sentence spoken, and gained a perilous advantage by asking,—

The old man had suddenly stopped his rant and demanded an answer so forcefully, and with such a unique flourish of his trumpet, that Nicholas, losing control of the well-thought-out explanation for his actions that had just been at the tip of his tongue, seized on the last thing said and took a risky chance by asking,—

"Have you, indeed, lived in this house forty years, Sir?"

"Have you really lived in this house for forty years, Sir?"

"Eh! what?" said the old gentleman, impatiently, perceiving that he had spoken. "Here, speak into my trumpet. What is the use of a trumpet, if you don't speak into it?"

"Eh! what?" said the old gentleman, impatiently, noticing that he had spoken. "Come on, talk into my trumpet. What’s the point of a trumpet if you don’t use it?"

"Oh," thought Nicholas to himself, "I see, he is excessively deaf"; and bending over the trumpet, where he saw a sieve-like frame, as if all speech were to be strained as it entered, he collected his force, and repeated the question, with measured and sonorous utterance, "Sir, have you lived in this house forty years?"

"Oh," Nicholas thought to himself, "I get it; he's really hard of hearing." Leaning over the trumpet, which had a mesh-like frame that seemed like it would filter all speech as it came in, he gathered his strength and asked the question again, speaking clearly and loudly, "Sir, have you lived in this house for forty years?"

"I just told you so," said the old man, not unnaturally starting back. "And if you were going to ask me such an unnecessary question at all," he added, testily, "you needn't have roared it out at me. I could have heard that without my trumpet. Yes, I've lived here forty years, and so has black Maria, who opened the door for you; and I say again that I have accomplished what I have by uninterrupted study. I haven't gone about, bowing to every he, she, and it. I never knew who lived in any of the other houses in the court till to-day, when a woman came and asked me to go out for the evening to her house; and just because it was Christmas-eve, I was foolish enough to be wheedled by her into saying I would go. Miss —— Miss ——, I can't remember her name now. I shall have to ask Maria. There, you haven't got much satisfaction out of me; but do you mind what I said to you, and it will be worth more than if I had told you what books to read. Eh?" And he invited Nicholas once more to drop his words into the trumpet.

"I just told you," the old man said, stepping back a bit. "And if you were going to ask me such a pointless question, you didn't need to shout it at me. I could have heard that without my trumpet. Yes, I've lived here for forty years, and so has Black Maria, who opened the door for you. I’ll say it again—I’ve accomplished what I have through constant study. I haven’t gone around, bowing to every person. I didn’t even know who lived in the other houses in the court until today, when a woman asked me to come over to her house for the evening. Just because it was Christmas Eve, I foolishly let her talk me into saying I would go. Miss—Miss—I can’t remember her name now. I’ll have to ask Maria. There, you haven’t gotten much out of me; but remember what I told you, and it’ll be worth more than if I had given you a list of books to read. Eh?" He then invited Nicholas again to drop his words into the trumpet.

"Good afternoon," said Nicholas, hesitatingly,—"thank you,"—at a loss what pertinent reply to make, and in despair of clearing himself from the tangle in which he had become involved. It was plain, too, that he should get no satisfaction here, at least upon the search in which he was engaged. But the reply seemed quite satisfactory to the old gentleman, who cheerfully relinquished him to black Maria, who, in turn, passed him out of the house.

"Good afternoon," Nicholas said hesitantly, "thank you," unsure of how to respond appropriately and feeling frustrated about the mess he had gotten himself into. It was clear that he wouldn't find any answers here, at least not regarding the search he was on. But the old gentleman seemed perfectly satisfied with his response and happily handed him over to black Maria, who then escorted him out of the house.

Left to himself, and rid of his personal embarrassment, he began to feel uncomfortably guilty, as he considered the confusion which he had entailed upon the real philological disciple, and would fain comfort himself with the hope that he had acted as a sort of lightning-rod to conduct the old scholar's bolts, and so had secured some immunity for the one at whom the bolts were really shot. But his own situation demanded his attention; and leaving the to-be unhappy young man and the to-be perplexed old gentleman to settle the difficulty over the mediating ear-trumpet, he addressed himself again to his task, and proposed to take another survey of the court, with the vague hope that his aunt might show herself with such unmistakable signs of relationship as to bring his researches to an immediate and triumphant close.

Left to himself and free from his personal embarrassment, he started to feel uncomfortably guilty as he thought about the confusion he had caused for the true philological student. He tried to comfort himself with the hope that he had acted like a lightning rod to absorb the old scholar's frustrations, thus protecting the real target of those frustrations. But his own situation needed his attention. So, leaving the soon-to-be unhappy young man and the soon-to-be confused old gentleman to figure out the problem over the mediating ear-trumpet, he returned to his task and decided to take another look around the court, with the vague hope that his aunt might appear with such clear signs of family resemblance that he could wrap up his search immediately and successfully.

Just as he was turning away from the front of Number One, buttoning his overcoat with an air of self-abstraction, he was suddenly and unaccountably attacked in the chest with such violence as almost to throw him off his feet. At the next moment his ears were assailed by a profusion of apologetic explanations from a young man, who made out to tell him, that, coming out of his house[Pg 25] with the intention of calling next door, he had leaped over the snow that lay between, and, not seeing the gentleman, had, most unintentionally, plunged headlong into him. He hoped he had not hurt him; he begged a thousand pardons; it was very careless in him; and then, perfect peace having succeeded this violent attack, the new-comer politely asked,—

Just as he was turning away from the front of Number One, buttoning his overcoat in a distracted way, he was suddenly and unexpectedly hit in the chest with such force that it nearly knocked him off his feet. In the next moment, he was overwhelmed by a flurry of apologies from a young man, who explained that he had just come out of his house[Pg 25] intending to visit next door. He had jumped over the snow that lay between them and, not seeing the gentleman, had accidentally crashed into him. He hoped he hadn’t hurt him; he offered a thousand apologies; it was very careless of him; and then, once the chaos of the incident had settled, the newcomer politely asked,—

"Can you tell me whether Doctor Chocker is at home, and disengaged? I perceive that you have just left his house."

"Can you let me know if Dr. Chocker is home and available? I see that you just came from his place."

"Do you mean the deaf old gentleman in Number One?" asked Nicholas.

"Are you talking about the deaf old man in Number One?" asked Nicholas.

"I was not aware that he was deaf," said his companion.

"I didn't know he was deaf," said his companion.

"And I did not know that his name was Doctor Chocker," said Nicholas, smiling. "But may I ask," said he, with a sudden thought, and blushing so hard that even the wintry red of his cheeks was outshone, "if you were just going to see him?"

"And I didn't know that his name was Doctor Chocker," said Nicholas, smiling. "But can I ask," he said, with a sudden thought, and blushing so much that even the winter-red of his cheeks was outshone, "if you were about to see him?"

"I had an appointment to see him at this hour; and that is the reason why I asked you if he was disengaged."

"I had a meeting with him at this time, which is why I asked you if he was free."

"He—he is not engaged, I believe," said Nicholas, stammering and blushing harder than ever; "but a word with you, Sir. I must—really—it was wholly unintentional—but unless I am mistaken, the old gentleman thought I was you."

"He—he isn't engaged, I think," Nicholas said, stammering and blushing harder than ever. "But I need to speak with you, sir. I really must—it was completely unintentional—but if I'm not mistaken, the old gentleman thought I was you."

"Thought you were I?" said the other, screwing his eyebrows into a question, and letting his nose stand for an exclamation-point. "But come, it is cold here,—will you do me the honor to come up to my room? At any rate, I should like to hear something about the old fellow." And he turned towards the next house.

"Did you think I was you?" said the other, raising his eyebrows in question and using his nose as an exclamation mark. "But come on, it's cold here—would you do me the honor of coming up to my room? Either way, I’d really like to hear something about the old guy." And he turned toward the next house.

"What—!" said Nicholas, "do you live in Number Two?"

"What—!" said Nicholas, "do you live in Number Two?"

"Yes, I have rooms here," said his companion, jumping back over the snow. "You seem surprised."

"Yeah, I have rooms here," said his companion, jumping back over the snow. "You look surprised."

"It is extraordinary," muttered Nicholas to himself, as he entered the house and followed his new acquaintance up stairs.

"It’s amazing," Nicholas said to himself as he entered the house and followed his new friend upstairs.

Their entrance seemed to create some confusion; for there was an indistinct sound as of a tumultuous retreat in every direction, a scuttling up and down stairs, and a whisking of dresses round corners, with still more indistinct and distant sound of suppressed chattering and a voice berating.

Their entrance caused a bit of chaos; there was a vague noise that sounded like a hectic scramble in every direction, people hurriedly moving up and down stairs, and skirts rustling around corners, along with a more muffled and distant sound of hushed chatter and a voice scolding.

"It is extremely provoking," said the young man, when they had entered his room and the door was shut; "but the people in this house seem to do nothing but watch my movements. You heard that banging about? Well, I seldom come in or go out, especially with a friend, but that just such a stampede takes place in the passage-ways and staircase. I have no idea who lives in the house, except a Mrs. Crimp, a very worthy woman, no doubt, but with too many children, I should guess. I only lodge here; and as I send my money down every month with the bill which I find on my table, I never see Mrs. Crimp. Now I don't see why they should be so curious about me. I'm sure I am very contented in my ignorance of the whole household. It's a little annoying, though, when I bring any one into the house. Will you excuse me a moment, while I ring for more coal?"

"It’s incredibly frustrating," said the young man as they entered his room and closed the door. "But it feels like everyone in this house is always watching me. Did you hear all that noise? Well, I hardly come in or out, especially with a friend, without causing a huge commotion in the hallways and on the stairs. I don’t know who else lives here, except for a Mrs. Crimp, who seems like a nice enough woman, but I assume she has too many kids. I just rent a room here; I send my payment down each month along with the bill I find on my table, so I never see Mrs. Crimp. I really don’t get why they’re so curious about me. I’m perfectly happy not knowing anything about the rest of the household. It is a bit annoying, though, when I bring someone back here. Could you excuse me for a moment while I ring for more coal?"

While he disappeared for this purpose, seeming to keep the bell in some other part of the house, Nicholas took a hasty glance round the room, and, opening a book on the table, read on the fly-leaf, Paul Le Clear, a name which he tagged for convenience to the occupant of the room until he should find one more authentic. The room corresponded to that in which he had met Doctor Chocker, but the cheerful gleam of an open fire gave a brighter aspect to the interior. Here also were books; but while at the Doctor's the walls, tables, and even floor seemed bursting with the crowd that had found lodging there, so that he had made his way to a chair by a sort of footpath through a field of folios, here there was the nicest order and an evident attempt at artistic arrangement. Nor were books alone the possessors of the walls; for a few pictures and busts had places, and two[Pg 26] or three ingenious cupboards excited curiosity. The room, in short, showed plainly the presence of a cultivated mind; and Nicholas, who, though unfamiliar with city-life, had received a capital intellectual training at the hands of a scholarly, but anchoret father, was delighted at the signs of culture in his new acquaintance.

While he stepped away for that purpose, seemingly taking the bell to another part of the house, Nicholas quickly looked around the room and opened a book on the table. He read on the fly-leaf, Paul Le Clear, a name he noted for convenience to refer to the room's occupant until he found something more certain. The room was similar to the one where he had met Doctor Chocker, but the cheerful glow of an open fire made the space feel brighter. There were books here too; but while at the Doctor's the walls, tables, and even the floor seemed bursting with the collection that had found a home there—making it necessary for him to navigate through a path of folios to reach a chair—here everything was neatly organized and there was a clear effort at artistic arrangement. The walls weren't just filled with books; a few pictures and busts were displayed, and two or three cleverly designed cupboards sparked curiosity. In short, the room clearly reflected the presence of a cultured mind; and Nicholas, who, although not accustomed to city life, had received excellent intellectual training from a scholarly but solitary father, was pleased to see signs of culture in his new acquaintance.

Mr. Le Clear reëntered the room, followed presently by the coal-scuttle in the hands of a small servant, and, remembering the occasion which had brought them together, invited Nicholas to finish the explanation which he had begun below. He, set at ease by the agreeable surroundings, opened his heart wide, and, for the sake of explicitness in his narration, proposed to begin back at the very beginning.

Mr. Le Clear came back into the room, soon followed by a small servant carrying the coal-scuttle. Remembering the reason they were there, he invited Nicholas to continue the explanation he had started downstairs. Feeling relaxed in the pleasant environment, Nicholas opened up and, for clarity in his story, decided to start right from the very beginning.

"By all means begin at the beginning," said Mr. Le Clear, rubbing his hands in expectant pleasure; "but before you begin, my good Sir, let me suggest that we take a cup of tea together. I must take mine early to-night, as I am to spend the evening out, and there's something to tell you, Sir, when you are through,"—as if meeting his burst of confidence with a corresponding one,—"though it's a small matter, probably, compared with yours, but it has amused me. I can't make a great show on the table," he added, with an elegant humility, when Nicholas accepted his invitation; "but I like to take my tea in my room, though I go out for dinner."

"Go ahead and start from the beginning," Mr. Le Clear said, rubbing his hands with eager pleasure. "But before you dive in, my good sir, let me suggest we have a cup of tea together. I need to have mine early tonight since I'll be out for the evening, and there's something I need to share with you once you're done,"—matching his excitement with a bit of his own,—"although it’s probably a minor thing compared to yours, but it's been entertaining for me. I can't put on much of a spread on the table," he added with a touch of graciousness when Nicholas accepted his invitation; "but I prefer to have my tea in my room, even though I go out for dinner."

So saying, he brought from the cupboard a little table-cloth, and, bustling about, deposited on a tea-tray, one by one, various members of a tea-set, which had evidently been plucked from a tea-plant in China, since the forms and figures were all suggested by the flowery kingdom. The lids of the vessels were shaped like tea-leaves; and miniature China men and women picked their way about among the letters of the Chinese alphabet, as if they were playing at word-puzzles. Nicholas admired the service to its owner's content, establishing thus a new bond of sympathy between them; and both were soon seated near the table, sipping the tea with demure little spoons, that approached the meagreness of Chinese chop-sticks, and decorating white bread with brown marmalade.

So he said, and he took a small tablecloth from the cupboard. Busy around the kitchen, he placed various pieces of a tea set on a tray, which clearly came from China, as the designs and shapes were inspired by that colorful country. The lids of the teapots were shaped like tea leaves, and tiny Chinese figures walked among the letters of the Chinese alphabet, almost like they were playing a word puzzle. Nicholas appreciated the set, which made the owner happy, creating a new connection between them. Soon, they were both sitting by the table, sipping tea with delicate little spoons that were almost as thin as Chinese chopsticks, while spreading brown marmalade on white bread.

"Now," said the host, "since you share my salt, I ought to be introduced to you, an office which I will perform without ceremony. My name is Paul Le Clear," which Nicholas and we had already guessed correctly.

"Now," said the host, "since you share my salt, I should introduce myself to you, which I will do without any formality. My name is Paul Le Clear," something Nicholas and we had already correctly figured out.

"And mine," said Nicholas, "is Nicholas,—Nicholas Judge."

"And mine," said Nicholas, "is Nicholas—Nicholas Judge."

"Very well, Mr. Judge; now let us have the story," said Paul, extending himself in an easy attitude; "and begin at the beginning."

"Alright, Mr. Judge; now let's hear the story," said Paul, settling into a comfortable position; "and start from the beginning."

"The story begins with my birth," said Nicholas, with a reckless ingenuousness which was a large part of his host's entertainment.

"The story starts with my birth," said Nicholas, with a carefree honesty that was a big part of his host's amusement.

But it is unnecessary to recount in detail what Paul heard, beginning at that epoch, twenty-two years back. Enough to say in brief what Nicholas elaborated: that his mother had died at his birth, in a country home at the foot of a mountain; that in that home he had lived, with his father for almost solitary friend and teacher, until, his father dying, he had come to the city to live; that he had but just reached the place, and had made it his first object to find his mother's only sister, with whom, indeed, his father had kept up no acquaintance, and for finding whom he had but a slight clue, even if she were then living. Nicholas brought his narrative in regular order down to the point where Paul had so unexpectedly accosted him, stopping there, since subsequent facts were fully known to both.

But it's not necessary to go into detail about what Paul heard starting from that time, twenty-two years ago. It's enough to briefly say what Nicholas explained: that his mother died when he was born, in a house at the foot of a mountain; that he lived there with his father, who was almost his only friend and teacher, until his father passed away, after which he moved to the city; that he had just arrived in the city and made it his first goal to find his mother's only sister, with whom his father had lost touch, and for whom he had only a vague lead, even if she was still alive. Nicholas told his story in order until the point where Paul unexpectedly approached him, stopping there since they both were fully aware of what happened next.

"And now," he concluded, warming with his subject, "I am in search of my aunt. What sort of woman she will prove to be I cannot tell; but if there is any virtue in sisterly blood, surely my Aunt Eunice cannot be without some of that noble nature which belonged to my mother, as I have heard her described, and as her miniature bids me believe in. How many times of late, in my solitariness, have I pictured to myself this one kinswoman receiving me[Pg 27] for her sister's sake, and willing to befriend me for my own! True, I am strong, and able, I think, to make my way in the world unaided. It is not such help as would ease my necessary struggle that I ask, but the sympathy which only blood-relationship can bring. So I build great hopes on my success in the search; and I have chosen this evening as a fit time for the happy recognition. I cannot doubt that we shall keep our Christmas together. Do you know of any one, Mr. Le Clear, living in this court, who might prove to be my aunt?"

"And now," he concluded, getting more passionate about his topic, "I’m looking for my aunt. I can’t say what kind of woman she’ll be, but if there’s any goodness in family ties, my Aunt Eunice must have some of that noble spirit that my mother, as I’ve heard her described, had, and that her portrait makes me believe in. Lately, in my solitude, I’ve imagined this one relative welcoming me[Pg 27] for her sister’s sake and willing to help me for my own good! Sure, I'm strong and I believe I can make my way in the world on my own. But it's not the kind of help that would lighten my necessary struggles that I’m looking for; it’s the understanding that only family can provide. So I’m really hopeful about finding her; I’ve picked this evening as the perfect time for our happy reunion. I have no doubt we’ll celebrate Christmas together. Do you know anyone, Mr. Le Clear, living in this court, who might be my aunt?"

"Upon my soul," said that gentleman, who had been sucking the juice of Nicholas's narrative, and had now reached the skin, "you have come to the last person likely to be able to tell you. It was only to-day that I learned by a correspondence with Doctor Chocker, whom all the world knows, that he was living just next door to me. Who lives on the other side I can't tell. Mrs. Crimp lives here; but she receipts her bills, Temperance A. Crimp; so there's no chance for a Eunice there. As for the other three houses, I know nothing, except just this: and here I come to my story, which is very short, and nothing like so entertaining as yours. Yesterday I was called upon by a jiggoty little woman,—I say jiggoty, because that expresses exactly my meaning,—a jiggoty little woman, who announced herself as Miss Pix, living in Number Five, and who brought an invitation in person to me to come to a small party at her house this Christmas-eve; and as she was jiggoty, I thought I would amuse myself by going. But she is Miss Pix; and your aunt, according to your showing, should be Mrs."

"Honestly," said the gentleman, who had been enjoying Nicholas's story and had now reached the end, "you have come to the last person who could possibly tell you. It was just today that I found out through a letter from Doctor Chocker, who everyone knows, that he lives right next door to me. I can't say who lives on the other side. Mrs. Crimp lives here, but she signs her bills as Temperance A. Crimp, so there's no chance of a Eunice there. As for the other three houses, I know nothing, except this: and here comes my story, which is very short and not nearly as entertaining as yours. Yesterday, a fidgety little woman came by—I'm calling her fidgety because that perfectly captures what I mean—this fidgety little woman, who introduced herself as Miss Pix, living in Number Five, brought me a personal invitation to a small party at her place this Christmas Eve; and since she was fidgety, I thought I'd entertain myself by going. But she is Miss Pix, and your aunt, if I remember correctly, should be Mrs."

"That must be where the old gentleman, Doctor Chocker, is going," said Nicholas, who had forgotten to mention that part of the Doctor's remarks, and now did so.

"That must be where the old guy, Doctor Chocker, is headed," said Nicholas, who had forgotten to mention that part of the Doctor's comments, and now did so.

"Really, that is entertaining!" cried Paul. "I certainly shall go, if it's for nothing else than to see Miss Pix and Doctor Chocker together."

"That’s actually entertaining!" Paul exclaimed. "I definitely want to go, if for no other reason than to see Miss Pix and Doctor Chocker together."

"Pardon my ignorance, Mr. Le Clear," said Nicholas, with a smile; "but what do you mean by jiggoty?"

"Pardon my ignorance, Mr. Le Clear," said Nicholas, smiling, "but what do you mean by jiggoty?"

"I mean," said Paul, "to express a certain effervescence of manner, as if one were corked against one's will, ending in a sudden pop of the cork and a general overflowing. I invented the word after seeing Miss Pix. She is an odd person; but I shouldn't wish to be so concerned about my neighbors as she appears to be. My philosophy of life," he continued, standing now before the fire, and receiving its entire radiation upon the superficies of his back, "is to extract sunshine from cucumbers. Think of living forty years, like Doctor Chocker, on the husks of the digamma! I am obliged to him for his advice, but I sha'n't follow it. Here are my books and prints; out of doors are people and Nature: I propose to extract sunshine from all these cucumbers. The world was made for us, and not we for the world. When I go to Miss Pix's this evening,—and, by the way, it's 'most time to go,—I presume I shall find one or two ripe cucumbers. Christmas, too, is a capital season for this chemical experiment. I find people are more off their guard, and offer special advantages for a curious observer and experimenter. Here is my room; you see how I live; and when I have no visitor at tea, I wind up my little musical box. You have no idea what a pretty picture I make, sitting in my chair, the tea-table by me, the fire in the grate, and the musical box for a cricket on the hearth"; and Mr. Le Clear laughed good-humoredly.

"I mean," said Paul, "to express a certain bubbly energy, as if someone were corked against their will, ending in a sudden pop of the cork and a general overflow. I came up with the word after seeing Miss Pix. She's a quirky person, but I wouldn't want to be as concerned about my neighbors as she seems to be. My philosophy of life," he continued, now standing by the fire and soaking up its warmth on his back, "is to find joy in the simplest things. Imagine living forty years like Doctor Chocker, on the scraps of life! I'm grateful for his advice, but I won’t take it. Here are my books and prints; outside are people and nature: I intend to find joy in all these simple pleasures. The world was made for us, not us for the world. When I go to Miss Pix's this evening—and by the way, it’s almost time to go—I expect to find one or two enjoyable experiences. Christmas is also a great time for this little experiment. I notice that people are more relaxed and offer unique opportunities for a curious observer. Here’s my room; you can see how I live, and when I don’t have anyone over for tea, I wind up my little music box. You wouldn’t believe what a lovely scene I create, sitting in my chair, the tea table beside me, the fire in the hearth, and the music box providing a cheerful tune"; Mr. Le Clear laughed warmly.

Nicholas laughed, too. He had been smiling throughout the young philosopher's discourse; but he was conscious of a little feeling of uneasiness, as if he were being subjected to the cucumber-extract process. He had intended at first to deliver the scheme of life which he had adopted, but, on the whole, determined to postpone it. He rose to go, and shook hands with Paul, who wished him all success in finding his aunt; as for himself, he thought he got along better without aunts. The two went down stairs to the door, causing[Pg 28] very much the same dispersion of the tribes as before; and Nicholas once more stood in Five-Sisters Court, while Paul Le Clear returned to his charming bower, to be tickled with the recollection of the adventure, and to prepare for Miss Pix's party.

Nicholas laughed too. He had been smiling during the young philosopher's talk, but he felt a bit uneasy, as if he were going through some strange process. He initially planned to share his life plan, but ultimately decided to hold off on that. He stood up to leave and shook hands with Paul, who wished him the best of luck in finding his aunt; as for Paul, he felt he managed better without aunts. The two went downstairs to the door, creating[Pg 28] a similar dispersal of the crowd as before; and once again, Nicholas found himself in Five-Sisters Court, while Paul Le Clear returned to his lovely spot, amused by the memory of the adventure and getting ready for Miss Pix's party.

"On the whole, I think I won't disturb Doctor Chocker's mind by clearing it up," said he to himself. "It might, too, bring on a repetition of the fulmination against my paper which the young Judge seemed so to enjoy relating. An innocent youth, certainly! I wonder if he expected me to give him my autobiography."

"Overall, I think I won’t bother Doctor Chocker by explaining things," he said to himself. "It might also trigger a repeat of the rant against my paper that the young Judge seemed to enjoy sharing. Such an innocent guy! I wonder if he thought I was going to share my life story with him."

Nicholas Judge confessed to himself a slight degree of despondency, as he looked at the remaining two houses in the court, since Miss Pix's would have to be counted out, and reflected that his chances of success were dwindling. His recent conversation had left upon his mind, for some reason which he hardly stopped now to explain, a disagreeable impression; and he felt a trifle wearied of this very dubious enterprise. What likelihood was there, if his aunt had lived here a long time past, as he assumed in his calculations, that she would have failed to make herself known in some way to Doctor Chocker? since the vision which he had of this worthy lady was that of a kind-hearted and most neighborly soul. But he reflected that city life must differ greatly from that in the country, even more than he had conceded with all his a priori reasonings; and he decided to draw no hasty inferences, but to proceed in the Baconian method by calling at Number Three. He was rather out of conceit with his strategy of thirst, which had so fallen below the actual modes of effecting an entrance, and now resolved to march boldly up with the irresistible engine of straight-forward inquiry,—as straight-forward, at least, as the circumstances would permit. He knocked at the door. After a little delay, enlivened for him by the interchange of voices within the house, apparently at opposite extremities, a light approached, and the door was opened, disclosing a large and florid-faced man, in his shirt-sleeves, holding a small and sleepy lamp in his hand. Nicholas moved at once upon the enemy's works.

Nicholas Judge felt a bit down as he looked at the last two houses in the court, knowing Miss Pix's couldn't be counted, and realized his chances were fading. The recent conversation had left an unpleasant feeling in his mind for a reason he wasn't fully thinking through, and he was feeling a bit tired of this uncertain endeavor. What were the chances, if his aunt had lived here for quite some time as he assumed, that she wouldn't have somehow reached out to Doctor Chocker? He imagined her as a kind-hearted and friendly person. But he thought about how life in the city must be very different from life in the country, even more than he had originally considered, so he decided not to jump to conclusions and instead follow a more logical approach by visiting Number Three. He was a bit frustrated with his earlier strategy of indirectly trying to get in, which had proven less effective than he expected, so he committed to being straightforward and asking directly—as straightforward as the situation allowed. He knocked on the door. After a brief pause, during which he could hear voices inside the house seemingly coming from different parts, a light appeared, and the door opened to reveal a large, overly cheerful man in his shirt-sleeves holding a small, dim lamp. Nicholas immediately moved forward to engage.

"Will you have the goodness to tell me, Sir, if a lady named Miss Eunice Brown lives here?"—that being his aunt's maiden name, and possibly good on demand thirty years after date. The reply came, after a moment's deliberation, as if the man wished to gain time for an excursion into some unexplored region of the house,—

"Could you please tell me, sir, if a lady named Miss Eunice Brown lives here?"—which was his aunt's maiden name, and could still be valid even thirty years later. The response came after a moment of thought, as if the man wanted to take some time for a trip into an unknown part of the house,—

"Well, Sir, I won't say positively that she doesn't; and yet I can say, that, in one sense of the word, Miss Eunice Brown does not live here. Will you walk in, and we will talk further about it."

"Well, Sir, I won't say for sure that she doesn't; but I can say that, in a sense, Miss Eunice Brown doesn't live here. Would you like to come in, and we can discuss it further?"

Nicholas entered, though somewhat wondering how they were to settle Miss Brown's residence there by the most protracted conversation. The man in shirt-sleeves showed him into a sitting-room, and setting the lamp upon the top of a corner what-not, where it twinkled like a distant star, he gave Nicholas a seat, and took one opposite to him, first shutting the door behind them.

Nicholas came in, somewhat unsure of how they were going to sort out Miss Brown's stay there with such a long conversation. The man in his shirt sleeves led him to a sitting room, placed the lamp on top of a corner shelf where it twinkled like a far-off star, offered Nicholas a seat, and took one across from him, making sure to close the door behind them first.

"Will you give me your name, Sir?" said he.

"Can you tell me your name, Sir?" he asked.

Nicholas hesitated, not quite liking to part with it to one who might misuse it.

Nicholas hesitated, not really wanting to give it up to someone who might misuse it.

"I have no objection," said his companion, in a sonorous voice, "to giving my name to any one that asks it. My name is Soprian Manlius."

"I don't mind," said his companion, in a deep voice, "giving my name to anyone who asks. My name is Soprian Manlius."

"And mine," said Nicholas, not to be outdone in generosity, "is Nicholas Judge."

"And mine," said Nicholas, wanting to match the generosity, "is Nicholas Judge."

"Very well, Mr. Judge. Now we understand each other, I think. I asked your name as a guaranty of good faith. Anonymous contributions cannot be received, et cetera,—as they say at the head of newspapers. And that's my rule of business, Sir. People come to me to ask the character of a girl, and I ask their names. If they don't want to give them, I say, 'Very well; I can't intrust the girl's character to people without name.' And it brings them out, Sir, it brings them out," said Mr. Manlius,[Pg 29] leaning back, and taking a distant view of his masterly diplomacy.

"Alright, Mr. Judge. I think we're on the same page now. I asked for your name as a way to ensure good faith. Anonymous contributions can't be accepted, you know, as they say at the top of newspapers. That's my business policy, Sir. People come to me to ask about a girl's character, and I ask for their names. If they don’t want to provide them, I say, 'That's fine; I can't trust the girl's character to people without names.' And it gets them to open up, Sir, it really does," said Mr. Manlius,[Pg 29] leaning back and taking a moment to appreciate his clever approach.

"Do people come to you to inquire after persons' characters?" asked Nicholas, somewhat surprised at happening upon such an oracle.

"Do people come to you to ask about others' characters?" Nicholas asked, a bit surprised to have stumbled upon such a source of wisdom.

"Well, in a general way, no," said Mr. Manlius, smiling; "though I won't say but that they would succeed as well here as in most places. In a particular way, yes. I keep an intelligence-office. Here is my card, Sir,"—pulling one out of his waistcoat-pocket, and presenting it to Nicholas; "and you will see by the phraseology employed, that I have unrivalled means for securing the most valuable help from all parts of the world. Mr. Judge," he whispered, leaning forward, and holding up his forefinger to enforce strict secrecy, "I keep a paid agent in Nova Scotia." And once more Mr. Manlius retreated in his chair, to get the whole effect of the announcement upon his visitor.

"Well, generally speaking, no," Mr. Manlius said with a smile; "although I wouldn't say they wouldn't do just as well here as in most places. Specifically, yes. I run an employment agency. Here’s my card, Sir,"—he pulled one from his waistcoat pocket and handed it to Nicholas; "and you’ll notice from the wording that I have unmatched resources for finding the best help from all over the world. Mr. Judge," he whispered, leaning in and raising his forefinger for emphasis, "I have a paid agent in Nova Scotia." And once again, Mr. Manlius leaned back in his chair to gauge his visitor's reaction to the news.

The internal economy of an office for obtaining and furnishing intelligence might have been further revealed to Nicholas; but at this moment a voice was heard on the outside of the door, calling, "S'prian! S'prian! we're 'most ready."

The inner workings of an office for gathering and providing information could have been explained further to Nicholas; but at that moment, a voice was heard outside the door, calling, "S'prian! S'prian! We're almost ready."

"Coming, Caroline," replied Mr. Manlius, and, recalled to the object for which his visitor was there, he turned to Nicholas, and resumed,—

"Coming, Caroline," Mr. Manlius replied, and, reminded of the reason for his visitor's presence, he turned to Nicholas and continued,—

"Well, Mr. Judge, about Miss Eunice Brown, whether she lives here or not. Are you personally acquainted with Miss Brown?"

"Well, Mr. Judge, regarding Miss Eunice Brown, whether she lives here or not. Do you know Miss Brown personally?"

"No, Sir," said Nicholas, frankly. "I will tell you plainly my predicament. Miss Eunice Brown was my mother's sister; but after my mother's death, which took place at my birth, there was no intercourse with her on the part of our family, which consisted of my father and myself. My father, I ought to say, had no unfriendliness toward her, but his habits of life were those of a solitary student; and therefore he took no pains to keep up the acquaintance. He heard of her marriage, and the subsequent death of her husband; rumor reached him of a second marriage, but he never heard the name of the man she married in either case. My father lately died; but before his death he advised me to seek this aunt, if possible, since she was my only living near relation; and he told me that he had heard of her living in this court many years ago. So I have come here with faint hope of tracing her."

"No, Sir," Nicholas said honestly. "Let me explain my situation. Miss Eunice Brown was my mother's sister, but after my mother passed away during my birth, our family, which included just my father and me, lost all contact with her. It's worth mentioning that my father didn't have anything against her; he just lived the life of a solitary scholar and didn't make an effort to stay in touch. He found out about her marriage and later, her husband's death. He also heard rumors about her marrying again, but he never learned the name of her second husband. My father recently passed away, but before he did, he encouraged me to try to find this aunt since she's my only living close relative. He mentioned that he heard she was living in this court many years ago. So, I've come here with little hope of tracing her."

Mr. Manlius listened attentively to this explanation; and then solemnly walking to the door, he called in a deep voice, as if he would have the summons start from the very bottom of the house for thoroughness,—"Caroline!"

Mr. Manlius listened carefully to this explanation; and then, walking solemnly to the door, he called out in a deep voice, as if he wanted the summons to echo from the very bottom of the house for effect, — "Caroline!"

The call was answered immediately by the appearance of Mrs. Manlius, in a red dress, that put everything else in the room in the background.

The call was answered right away by Mrs. Manlius, who walked in wearing a red dress that made everything else in the room fade into the background.

"Caroline," said he, more impressively than would seem necessary, and pointing to Nicholas, "this is Mr. Nicholas Judge. Mr. Judge, you see my wife."

"Caroline," he said, more dramatically than needed, and pointing at Nicholas, "this is Mr. Nicholas Judge. Mr. Judge, you’re seeing my wife."

"But, my dear," said Mrs. Manlius, nervously, as soon as she had bowed, discovering the feeble lamp, which was saving its light by burning very dimly, "that lamp will be off the what-not in a moment. How could you put it right on the edge?" And she took it down from its pinnacle, and placed it firmly on the middle of a table, at a distance from anything inflammable. "Mr. Manlius is so absent-minded, Sir," said she, turning to Nicholas.

"But, my dear," said Mrs. Manlius nervously, as soon as she had bowed, noticing the weak lamp that was barely giving off any light, "that lamp is going to fall off the shelf any moment now. Why would you put it right on the edge?" She took it down from its precarious spot and set it securely in the center of a table, away from anything flammable. "Mr. Manlius is so forgetful, Sir," she said, turning to Nicholas.

"Caroline," said her husband, "this will be a memorable day in the history of our family. Eunice has found a dear sister's son."

"Caroline," her husband said, "today will be a day to remember in our family's history. Eunice has found the son of a beloved sister."

"Where?" she asked, turning for explanation to Nicholas, who at Mr. Manlius's words felt his heart beat quicker.

"Where?" she asked, turning to Nicholas for an explanation. At Mr. Manlius's words, Nicholas felt his heart race.

Then Mr. Manlius, in as few words as his dignity and the occasion would deem suitable, stated the case to his wife, who looked admiringly upon Mr. Manlius's oratory, and interestingly upon Nicholas.

Then Mr. Manlius, in as few words as his dignity and the situation allowed, explained the situation to his wife, who looked admirably at Mr. Manlius's speech and with interest at Nicholas.

"Shall I call Eunice down, S'prian?" said she, when her husband concluded, and conveying some mysterious information to him by means of private signals.[Pg 30]

"Should I call Eunice down, S'prian?" she asked, after her husband finished speaking, sharing some secret information with him through discreet signals.[Pg 30]

"We have here," said Mr. Manlius, now turning the hose of his eloquence toward Nicholas, and playing upon him, "we have here a dear friend, who has abode in our house for many years. She came to us when she was in trouble, and here has she found a resting-place for the soles of her feet. Sir," with a darksome glance, "her relations had forgotten her."

"We have here," said Mr. Manlius, now directing his eloquent speech toward Nicholas, "we have here a dear friend who has stayed in our home for many years. She came to us when she was in trouble, and here she has found a place to rest. Sir," with a somber look, "her relatives had forgotten her."

"I must say"——interrupted Nicholas; but Mr. Manlius waved him back, and continued:—

"I have to say," Nicholas started, but Mr. Manlius cut him off and kept going:—

"But she found true kinsfolk in the friends of her early days. We have cared for her tenderly, and now at last we have our reward in consigning her to the willing hands of a young scion of her house. She was Eunice Brown; she had a sister who married a Judge, as I have often heard her say; and she herself married Mr. Archibald Starkey, who is now no more. Caroline, I will call Eunice"; and Mr. Manlius went heavily out of the room.

"But she found true family in the friends of her early days. We have cared for her lovingly, and now at last we have our reward in handing her over to the eager hands of a young member of her family. She was Eunice Brown; she had a sister who married a judge, as I have often heard her say; and she herself married Mr. Archibald Starkey, who is now gone. Caroline, I will call Eunice"; and Mr. Manlius walked slowly out of the room.

Nicholas was very much agitated, and Mrs. Manlius very much excited, over this sudden turn of affairs.

Nicholas was very upset, and Mrs. Manlius was very stirred up about this sudden change in events.

"Eunice has lived with us fifteen years, come February; and she has been one of the family, coming in and going out like the rest of us. I found her on the doorstep one night, and wasn't going to bring her in at first, because, you see, I didn't know what she might be; when, lo and behold! she looked up, and said I, 'Eunice Brown!' 'Yes,' said she, and said she was cold and hungry; and I brought her in, and told Mr. Manlius, and he came and talked with her, and said he, 'Caroline, there is character in that woman'; for, Mr. Judge, Mr. Manlius can read character in a person wonderfully; he has a real gift that way; and, indeed, he needs it in his profession; and, as I tell him, he was born an intelligence-officer."

"Eunice has been with us for fifteen years this coming February; she's really become part of the family, coming and going just like the rest of us. I found her on the doorstep one night, and I wasn’t sure about bringing her in at first because I didn’t know who she was. But then, out of the blue, she looked up and said, 'Eunice Brown!' I replied, 'Yes,' and she mentioned she was cold and hungry, so I brought her inside. I told Mr. Manlius, and he came over to talk to her and said, 'Caroline, there’s character in that woman.’ You see, Mr. Judge, Mr. Manlius has an amazing talent for reading people’s character; it’s a real gift of his, and honestly, it’s essential for his job. I often tell him he was born an intelligence officer."

Thus, and with more in the same strain, did Mrs. Manlius give vent to her feelings, though hardly in the ear of Nicholas, who paced the room in restless expectation of his aunt's approach. He heard enough to give a turn to his thoughts; and it was with unaffected sorrow that he reflected how the lonely woman had been dependent upon the charity, as it seemed, of others. He saw in her now no longer merely the motherly aunt who was to welcome him, but one whom he should care for, and take under his protection. He heard steps in the entry, and easily detected the ponderous tread of Mr. Manlius, who now opened the door, and reappeared in more careful toilet, since he was furbished and smoothed by the addition of proper touches, until he had quite the air of a man of society. He entered the room with great pomp and ceremony all by himself, and met Nicholas's disappointed look by saying, slowly,—

So, with more of the same, Mrs. Manlius expressed her feelings, though Nicholas barely caught her words as he walked around the room, restlessly waiting for his aunt to arrive. He heard enough to shift his thoughts; and he felt genuine sadness as he realized how the lonely woman seemed dependent on the kindness of others. He no longer saw her just as the welcoming aunt, but as someone he felt responsible for and wanted to protect. He heard footsteps in the hallway and easily recognized the heavy footsteps of Mr. Manlius, who now opened the door, appearing more presentable, having taken care to tidy himself up, giving him the look of a social man. He entered the room with a lot of flair and addressed Nicholas's disappointed expression by saying, slowly,—

"Mrs. Starkey, your beloved aunt, will appear presently"; and throwing a look about the room, as if he would call the attention of all the people in the dress-circle, boxes, and amphitheatre, he continued—"I have intimated to your aunt the nature of your relationship, and I need not say that she is quite agitated at the prospective meeting. She is a woman"——

"Mrs. Starkey, your favorite aunt, will be here soon"; and glancing around the room, as if to grab the attention of everyone in the dress circle, boxes, and amphitheater, he went on—"I’ve let your aunt know about your relationship, and I don't have to say that she is really nervous about the upcoming meeting. She is a woman"——

But Mr. Manlius's flow was suddenly turned off by the appearance of Mrs. Starkey herself. The introduction, too, which, as manager of this little scene, he had rehearsed to himself, was rendered unnecessary by the prompt action of Nicholas, who hastened forward, with tumultuous feelings, to greet his aunt. His honest nature had no sceptical reserve; and he saluted her affectionately, before the light of the feeble lamp, which seemed to have husbanded all its strength for this critical moment, could disclose to him anything of the personal appearance of his relative. At this moment the twinkling light, like a star at dawn, went out; and Mrs. Manlius, rushing off, reappeared with an astral, which turned the somewhat gloomy aspect of affairs into cheerful light. Perhaps it was symbolic of a sunrise upon the world which enclosed Nicholas and his aunt. Nicholas looked at Mrs. Starkey, who was indeed flurried, and saw a pinched and meagre woman, the flower of whose youth had long ago been[Pg 31] pressed in the book of ill-fortune until it was colorless and scentless. She found words presently, even before Nicholas did; and sitting down with him in the encouraging presence of the Manlii, she uttered her thoughts in an incoherent way:—

But Mr. Manlius's flow was suddenly interrupted by the arrival of Mrs. Starkey herself. The introduction, which he had rehearsed in his mind as the manager of this little scene, became unnecessary when Nicholas rushed forward, filled with turbulent emotions, to greet his aunt. His sincere nature had no room for skepticism; he affectionately greeted her before the weak light of the lamp, which seemed to have saved all its energy for this crucial moment, could reveal anything about his relative's appearance. At that moment, the flickering light, like a star at dawn, went out; and Mrs. Manlius quickly ran off and returned with an astral lamp, which transformed the somewhat gloomy atmosphere into cheerful light. Perhaps it symbolized a sunrise in the world surrounding Nicholas and his aunt. Nicholas looked at Mrs. Starkey, who was indeed flustered, and saw a drawn and thin woman, the bloom of whose youth had long ago been pressed into the book of misfortune until it was colorless and scentless. She managed to find words soon, even before Nicholas did; and sitting down with him in the encouraging presence of the Manlii, she expressed her thoughts in a jumbled manner:—

"Dear, dear! who would have said it? When Miss Pix came to invite us all to her party, and said, 'Mrs. Starkey, I'm sure I hope you will come,' I thought it might be too much for such a quiet body as I be. But that was nothing to this. Why, if here I haven't got a real nephew; and, to be sure, it's a great while since I saw your mother, but, I declare, you do look just like her, and a Judge's son you are, too. Did they say you looked like your father, Nickey? I was asking Caroline if she thought my bombazine would do, after all; and now I do think I ought to wear my India silk, and put on my pearl necklace, for I don't want my Nicky to be ashamed of me. You'll go with us, won't you, nephew, to Miss Pix's? I expect it's going to be a grand party; and I'll go round and introduce you to all the great people; and how did you leave your father, Nicholas?"

"Wow, who would have thought? When Miss Pix invited us to her party and said, 'Mrs. Starkey, I really hope you can make it,' I figured it might be too much for someone as reserved as I am. But this is a whole different story. I can’t believe I’ve got a real nephew now; it’s been ages since I saw your mom, but honestly, you look just like her, and you’re a Judge's son too. Did anyone say you resemble your dad, Nickey? I was asking Caroline if she thought my bombazine would work after all, and now I think I should wear my India silk and put on my pearl necklace because I don’t want my Nicky to be embarrassed by me. You’ll come with us, right, nephew, to Miss Pix's? I bet it’s going to be an amazing party; I’ll go around and introduce you to all the important people. By the way, how’s your dad doing, Nicholas?"

"Why, aunt, did not Mr. Manlius tell you that he was dead?" said Nicholas. "Her memory's a little short," whispered Mrs. Manlius; but, hardly interrupted by this little answer and whisper, Mrs. Starkey was again plunging headlong into a current of words, and struggling among the eddies of various subjects. Meanwhile, Mr. and Mrs. Manlius, having, as managers, set the little piece on the stage in good condition, were carrying on a private undertoned conversation, which resulted in Mrs. Manlius asking, in an engaging manner,—

"Why didn’t Mr. Manlius tell you he was dead?" Nicholas said. "Her memory's a bit short," Mrs. Manlius whispered; but hardly interrupted by this small comment and whisper, Mrs. Starkey was diving back into a flow of words, getting caught up in the twists of different topics. Meanwhile, Mr. and Mrs. Manlius, having set the little scene on stage properly as managers, were having a quiet conversation, which led to Mrs. Manlius asking, in a friendly way,—

"Eunice, dear, would you prefer to stay at home this evening with your nephew? Because we will excuse you to Miss Pix, who would hardly expect you."

"Eunice, sweetheart, would you rather stay home tonight with your nephew? We can let Miss Pix know you're excused; she probably wouldn't expect you."

Mrs. Starkey was in the midst of a voluble description of some private jewelry which she intended to show the astonished Nicholas; but she caught the last words, and veered round to Mrs. Manlius, saying,—

Mrs. Starkey was in the middle of a lively description of some personal jewelry she planned to show the surprised Nicholas; but she heard the last words and turned to Mrs. Manlius, saying,—

"Indeed, she expects me; and she expects Nicholas, too. She will be very much gratified to see him, and I have no doubt she will give another party for him; and if she does, I mean to invite my friend the alderman to go. I shouldn't wonder if he was to be there to-night; and now I think of it, it must be time to be going. Caroline, have you got your things on?"

"She's definitely expecting me, and she’s expecting Nicholas, too. She'll be really pleased to see him, and I'm sure she'll throw another party for him; if she does, I plan to invite my friend the alderman to go. I wouldn't be surprised if he shows up tonight; and now that I think about it, it must be time to head out. Caroline, are you ready?"

Mrs. Starkey spoke with a determination that suffered no opposition, so that Nicholas and Mr. Manlius were left alone for a moment, while the two women should wrap themselves up.

Mrs. Starkey spoke with a determination that allowed for no disagreement, leaving Nicholas and Mr. Manlius alone for a moment while the two women bundled themselves up.

"Your aunt is unduly excited, Mr. Judge," said the intelligence-officer; "and it was for that reason that I advised she should not go. She has hardly been herself the last day or two. Our neighbor, Miss Pix,—a woman whose character is somewhat unsettled; no fixed principles. Sir, I fear," shaking his head regretfully; "too erratic, controlled by impulse, possessing an inquisitive temperament," telling off upon a separate finger each count in the charges against Miss Pix's character, and reserving for the thumb the final overwhelming accusation,—"Sir, she has not learned the great French economical principle of Lassy Fair." Miss Pix being thus stricken down, he helped her up again with an apology. "But her advantages have no doubt been few. She has not studied political economy; and how can she hope to walk unerringly?"—and Mr. Manlius gazed at an imaginary Miss Pix wandering without compass or guide over the desert of life. "She makes a party to-night. And why? Because it is Christmas-eve. That is a small foundation, Mr. Judge, on which to erect the structure of social intercourse. Society, Sir, should be founded on principles, not accidents. Because my house is accidentally contiguous to two others, shall I consider myself, and shall Mrs. Manlius consider herself, as necessarily bound by the ligaments of Nature—by the ligaments of Nature, Mr. Judge,—to[Pg 32] the dwellers in those houses? No, Sir. I don't know who lives in this court beside Miss Pix. Nature brought your aunt and Mrs. Manlius together, and Nature brought you and your aunt together. We will go, however, to Miss Pix's. It will gratify her. But your aunt is excited about the, for her, unusual occasion. And now she has seen you. I feared this interview might overcome her. She is frail; but she is fair, Sir, if I may say so. She has character; very few have as much,—and I have seen many women. Did you ever happen to see Martha Jewmer, Mr. Judge?"

"Your aunt is way too excited, Mr. Judge," said the intelligence officer. "That's why I suggested she shouldn’t go. She hasn’t really been herself the last couple of days. Our neighbor, Miss Pix—a woman whose character is somewhat unstable, without any fixed principles. Sir, I’m worried," he said, shaking his head sadly, "she’s too erratic, driven by impulse, with a curious nature," counting each point against Miss Pix on a separate finger and saving the thumb for the final, damning accusation—"Sir, she hasn’t grasped the important French economic principle of Laissez-Faire." With Miss Pix thus criticized, he helped her up again with an apology. "But she surely hasn’t had many advantages. She hasn't studied political economy; how can she expect to navigate through life correctly?"—and Mr. Manlius looked at an imaginary Miss Pix wandering aimlessly in the desert of life. "She’s throwing a party tonight. And why? Because it’s Christmas Eve. That’s a flimsy reason, Mr. Judge, to build social gatherings on. Society, Sir, should be based on principles, not random occasions. Just because my house happens to be next to two others, should I consider myself—and should Mrs. Manlius consider herself—as naturally tied to the people in those houses? No, Sir. I don’t know who else lives in this court besides Miss Pix. Nature brought your aunt and Mrs. Manlius together, and it brought you and your aunt together. We will go to Miss Pix’s, though. It will please her. But your aunt is hyped up about this unusual occasion. And now that she’s seen you, I worried this meeting might overwhelm her. She’s fragile; but she’s lovely, Sir, if I may say so. She has character; very few have as much—and I’ve seen many women. Have you ever happened to see Martha Jewmer, Mr. Judge?"

Nicholas could not remember that he had.

Nicholas couldn't recall that he had.

"Well, Sir, that woman has been in my office twelve times. I got a place for her each time. And why? Because she has character"; and Mr. Manlius leaned back to get a full view of character. Before he had satisfied himself enough to continue his reminiscences, his wife and Mrs. Starkey returned, bundled up as if they were going on a long sleigh-ride.

"Well, Sir, that woman has been in my office twelve times. I found a position for her each time. And why? Because she has personality," Mr. Manlius said as he leaned back to take in her character. Before he felt ready to continue his memories, his wife and Mrs. Starkey came back, bundled up as if they were about to go on a long sleigh ride.

"We're ready, S'prian," said Mrs. Manlius. "Eunice thinks she will go still,"—which was evident from the manner in which Mrs. Starkey had gathered about her a quantity of ill-assorted wrappers, out of the folds of which she delivered herself to each and all in a rapid and disjointed manner; and the party proceeded out of the house, Mrs. Manlius first shutting and opening various doors, according to some intricate system of ventilation and heating.

"We're ready, S'prian," said Mrs. Manlius. "Eunice thinks she’ll still go,"—which was clear from how Mrs. Starkey had collected a bunch of mismatched wraps around her, out of which she spoke to everyone quickly and in a jumbled way; and the group left the house, with Mrs. Manlius first closing and opening different doors, following some complicated system for ventilation and heating.

Nicholas gave his arm to his aunt, and, though anxious to speak of many things, could hardly slip a word into the crevices of her conversation; nor then did his questions or answers bring much satisfactory response. He was confused with various thoughts, unable to explain the random talk of his companion, and yet getting such glimpses of the dreary life she had led as made him resolve to give her a home that should admit more sunshine into her daily experience.

Nicholas offered his arm to his aunt, and although he wanted to talk about many things, he could barely get a word in during her conversation; even then, his questions or answers didn't get much of a satisfying response. He was overwhelmed with different thoughts, unable to make sense of the random chatter from his companion, but he caught glimpses of the bleak life she had lived, which made him decide to provide her with a home that would bring more happiness into her everyday life.

They were not kept waiting long at Miss Pix's door, for a ruddy German girl opened it at their summons; and once inside, Miss Pix herself came forward with beaming face to give them a Christmas-eve greeting. Mr. Manlius had intended making the official announcement of the arrival of the new nephew, but was no match for the ready Mrs. Starkey, who at once seized upon their hostess, and shook her warmly by the hand, pouring out a confused and not over-accurate account of her good-fortune, mixing in various details of her personal affairs. Miss Pix, however, made out the main fact, and turned to Nicholas, welcoming him with both hands, and in the same breath congratulating Mrs. Starkey, showing such honest, whole-souled delight that Nicholas for a moment let loose in his mind a half-wish that Miss Pix had proved to be his aunt, so much more nearly did she approach his ideal. The whole party stood basking for a moment in Miss Pix's Christmas greeting, then extricated themselves from their wrappers with the help of their bustling hostess, and were ushered into her little parlor, where they proved to be the first arrivals. It was almost like sitting down in an arbor: for walls and ceilings were quite put out of sight by the evergreen dressing; the candlesticks and picture-frames seemed to have budded; and even the poker had laid aside its constitutional stiffness, and unbent itself in a miraculous spiral of creeping vine. Mr. Manlius looked about him with the air of a connoisseur, and complimented Miss Pix.

They didn’t have to wait long at Miss Pix's door, as a cheerful German girl opened it for them. Once inside, Miss Pix herself came forward with a big smile to greet them on Christmas Eve. Mr. Manlius had planned to officially announce the arrival of the new nephew but couldn’t compete with the eager Mrs. Starkey, who immediately grabbed their hostess's hand and warmly shook it, sharing a jumbled and somewhat inaccurate story of her good fortune, blending in various details about her personal life. Miss Pix, however, caught the main point and turned to Nicholas, welcoming him with both hands while also congratulating Mrs. Starkey. Her genuine joy was so heartfelt that for a moment, Nicholas couldn’t help but wish that Miss Pix was his aunt, as she came closer to his ideal than anyone else. The whole group basked for a moment in Miss Pix's Christmas welcome before they shed their outer layers with the help of their busy hostess and were led into her cozy parlor, where they were the first guests to arrive. It felt almost like sitting in a garden: the walls and ceiling were completely hidden by evergreen decorations; the candlesticks and picture frames seemed to come to life; and even the poker had relaxed its usual stiffness, twisting into a miraculous vine-like shape. Mr. Manlius looked around like a connoisseur and complimented Miss Pix.

"A very pretty room, Miss Pix,—a very pretty room! Quite emblematical!" And he cocked his head at some new point.

"A really nice room, Miss Pix—really nice! Totally symbolic!" And he tilted his head at some new angle.

"Oh, I can't have my Christmas without greens!" said Miss Pix. "Christmas and greens, you know, is the best dish in the world. Isn't it, Mrs. Starkey?"

"Oh, I can't have my Christmas without greens!" said Miss Pix. "Christmas and greens, you know, is the best dish in the world. Isn't it, Mrs. Starkey?"

But Mrs. Starkey had no need of a question; for she had already started on her career as a member of the party, and was galloping over a boundless field of observation.

But Mrs. Starkey didn’t need to ask a question; she had already begun her journey as a member of the party and was racing across an endless field of observation.

There was just then another ring; and Miss Pix started for the door, in[Pg 33] her eagerness to greet her visitors, but recollected in season the tribute which she must pay to the by-laws of society, and hovered about the parlor-door till Gretchen could negotiate between the two parties. Gretchen's pleased exclamation in her native tongue at once indicated the nature of the arrival; and Miss Pix, whispering loudly to Mrs. Manlius, "My musical friends," again rushed forward, and received her friends almost noisily; for when they went stamping about the entry to shake off the snow from their feet against the inhospitable world outside, she also, in the excess of her sympathetic delight, caught herself stamping her little foot. There was a hurly-burly, and then they all entered the parlor in a procession, preceded by Miss Pix, who announced them severally to her guests as Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Pfeffendorf, Mr. Schmauker, and Mr. Windgraff. Everybody bowed at once, and rose to the surface, hopelessly ignorant of the name and condition of all the rest, except his or her immediate friends. The four musical gentlemen especially entirely lost their names in the confusion; and as they looked very much alike, it was hazardous to address them, except upon general and public grounds.

There was another ring at the door, and Miss Pix rushed to greet her visitors, but then remembered she had to follow social etiquette and hung back by the parlor door while Gretchen mediated between the two groups. Gretchen's excited shout in her native language immediately revealed who had arrived, and Miss Pix, loudly whispering to Mrs. Manlius, "My musical friends," hurried forward to welcome them with enthusiasm. As they stomped in to shake off the snow from their feet against the cold world outside, she couldn’t help but stomp her little foot out of sheer joy. There was a bustling energy, and then they all entered the parlor in a line, with Miss Pix introducing them one by one as Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Pfeffendorf, Mr. Schmauker, and Mr. Windgraff. Everyone bowed simultaneously, each person blissfully unaware of the names and situations of everyone else except for their immediate companions. The four musical gentlemen completely lost their identities in the chaos, and since they looked very similar, it was risky to address them unless it was on general grounds.

Mrs. Starkey was the most bewildered, and also the most bent upon setting herself right,—a task which promised to occupy the entire evening. "Which is the fifer?" she asked Nicholas; but he could not tell her, and she appealed in vain to the others. Perhaps it was as well, since it served as an unfailing resource with her through the evening. When nothing else occupied her attention, she would fix her eyes upon one of the four, and walk round till she found some one disengaged enough to label him, if possible; and as the gentlemen had much in common, while Mrs. Starkey's memory was confused, there was always room for more light.

Mrs. Starkey was the most confused and also the most determined to sort herself out—a task that was bound to take up the whole evening. "Which one is the fifer?" she asked Nicholas, but he couldn't tell her, and her attempts to get answers from the others were fruitless. Maybe it was for the best since it gave her something to focus on throughout the evening. Whenever nothing else caught her attention, she would fix her gaze on one of the four and walk around until she found someone free enough to identify him, if possible. Since the gentlemen shared many similarities and Mrs. Starkey's memory was hazy, there was always room for more clarity.

Miss Pix meanwhile had disentangled Nicholas from Mrs. Starkey, and, as one newly arrived in the court, was recounting to him the origin of her party.

Miss Pix, meanwhile, had freed Nicholas from Mrs. Starkey and, as someone new to the court, was telling him the story of how her party started.

"You see, Mr. Judge, I have only lived here a few weeks. I had to leave my old house; and I took a great liking to this little court, and especially to this little house in it. 'What a delightful little snuggery!' thought I. 'Here one can be right by the main streets, and yet be quiet all day and evening.' And that's what I want; because, you see, I have scholars to come and take music-lessons of me. 'And then,' I thought to myself, 'I can have four neighbors right in the same yard, you may say.' Well, here I came; but—do you believe it?—hardly anybody even looked out of the window when the furniture-carts came up, and I couldn't tell who lived in any house. Why, I was here three weeks, and nobody came to see me. I might have been sick, and nobody would have known it." Here little Miss Pix shook her head ruefully at the vision of herself sick and alone. "I've seen what that is," she added, with a mysterious look. "'Well, now,' I said to myself, 'I can't live like this. It isn't Christian. I don't believe but the people in the court could get along with me, if they knew me.' Well, they didn't come, and they didn't come; so I got tired, and one day I went round and saw them all,—no, I didn't see the old gentleman in Number One that time. Will you believe it? not a soul knew anybody else in any house but their own! I was amazed, and I said to myself, 'Betsey Pix, you've got a mission'; and, Mr. Judge, I went on that mission. I made up my mind to ask all the people in the court, who could possibly come, to have a Christmas-eve gathering in my house. I got them all, except the Crimps, in Number Two, who would not, do what I could. Then I asked four of my friends to come and bring their instruments; for there's nothing like music to melt people together. But, oh, Mr. Judge, not one house knows that another house in the court is to be here; and, oh, Mr. Judge, I've got such a secret!" And here Miss Pix's cork flew to the ceiling, in the manner hinted at by Mr. Paul Le Clear; while Nicholas felt himself to have known Miss Pix from birth, and[Pg 34] to be, in a special manner, her prime-minister on this evening.

"You see, Mr. Judge, I’ve only lived here a few weeks. I had to leave my old house, and I really liked this little courtyard, especially this little house in it. 'What a charming little place!' I thought. 'Here you can be close to the main streets but still enjoy peace all day and night.' That’s exactly what I want because I have students coming to take music lessons from me. 'And then,' I thought, 'I can have four neighbors right in the same yard, you know.' So, I moved in; but—can you believe it?—hardly anyone even glanced out the window when the moving trucks arrived, and I couldn’t figure out who lived in any of the houses. I was here for three weeks, and nobody came to visit me. I could have been sick, and no one would have known." Here, little Miss Pix shook her head sadly at the thought of being unwell and alone. "I've experienced that," she added with a mysterious look. "'Well, I thought, I can’t live like this. It isn’t right. I bet the people in the courtyard would get along with me if they knew me.' But they didn’t come, and they didn’t come, so I got fed up. One day, I went around to meet them all—oh, I didn’t see the old gentleman in Number One that time. Can you believe it? Not a single soul knew anyone else in any house aside from their own! I was shocked, and I told myself, 'Betsey Pix, you’ve got a mission'; and, Mr. Judge, I jumped into that mission. I decided to invite everyone in the courtyard who might come to a Christmas Eve gathering at my place. I got them all except for the Crimps in Number Two, who wouldn’t join no matter what I tried. Then I asked four of my friends to come and bring their instruments because nothing brings people together like music. But oh, Mr. Judge, not one house knows that another house in the courtyard is coming, and oh, Mr. Judge, I have such a secret!" And at that moment, Miss Pix's cork shot up to the ceiling, just as hinted at by Mr. Paul Le Clear, while Nicholas felt as though he had known Miss Pix forever and was, in a special way, her prime minister this evening.

It was not long before there was another ring, and Mr. Le Clear appeared, who received the jiggoty Miss Pix's welcome in a smiling and well-bred manner, and suffered himself to be introduced to the various persons present, when all seized the new opportunity to discover the names of the musical gentlemen, and fasten them to the right owners. Paul laughed when he saw Nicholas, and spoke to him as an old acquaintance. Miss Pix was suddenly in great alarm, and, beckoning away Nicholas, whispered, "Don't for the world tell him where the others live." Like the prime-minister with a state-secret, Nicholas went back to Paul, and spent the next few minutes in the trying task of answering leading questions with misleading answers.

It wasn't long before there was another ring at the door, and Mr. Le Clear showed up. He was greeted by the overly energetic Miss Pix with a warm smile and polite demeanor, and he allowed himself to be introduced to everyone present. Everyone seized the chance to figure out the names of the musicians and match them to the correct people. Paul laughed when he spotted Nicholas and greeted him like an old friend. Miss Pix suddenly looked very worried and, pulling Nicholas aside, whispered, "Whatever you do, don’t tell him where the others live." Like a prime minister with a classified secret, Nicholas returned to Paul and spent the next few minutes trying to answer leading questions with misleading answers.

"I see," said the acute Mr. Le Clear to himself; "the aunt is that marplotty dame who has turned our young Judge into a prisoner at the bar"; and he entered into conversation with Mrs. Starkey with great alacrity, finding her a very ripe cucumber. Mr. Manlius, who was talking, in easy words of two syllables, to the musical gentlemen, overheard some of Mrs. Starkey's revelations to Mr. Le Clear, and, watching his opportunity, got Paul into a corner, where he favored him with some confidences respecting the lady.

"I get it," thought the sharp Mr. Le Clear to himself; "the aunt is that meddlesome woman who has turned our young Judge into a prisoner at the bar." He then eagerly struck up a conversation with Mrs. Starkey, finding her quite intriguing. Mr. Manlius, who was chatting in simple terms with the musical gentlemen, overheard some of Mrs. Starkey's comments to Mr. Le Clear and, waiting for the right moment, pulled Paul aside to share some insider information about the lady.

"You may have thought, Sir," said he, in a whisper, "that Mrs. Starkey is—is,"—and he filled out the sentence with an expressive gesture toward his own well-balanced head.

"You might have thought, Sir," he said quietly, "that Mrs. Starkey is—is,"—and he completed the sentence with a meaningful gesture toward his own well-balanced head.

"Not at all," said Paul, politely.

"Not at all," Paul said politely.

"She is periodically affected," continued Mr. Manlius, "with what I may perhaps call excessive and ill-balanced volubility. Mrs. Starkey, Sir, is a quiet person, rarely speaking; but once in five or six weeks,—the periods do not return with exact regularity,—she is subject to some hidden influence, which looses her tongue, as it were. I think she is under the influence now, and her words are not likely to—to correspond exactly with existing facts. You will not be surprised, then, at her words. They are only words, words. At other times she is a woman of action. She has a wonderful character, Sir."

"Sometimes she gets caught up," Mr. Manlius went on, "in what I might call excessive and unbalanced chattiness. Mrs. Starkey, Sir, is a reserved person who rarely speaks; but every five or six weeks—though the timing isn’t perfectly regular—she seems to be under some hidden influence that makes her talk a lot. I believe she’s feeling that way right now, and her words probably won’t accurately reflect the reality of things. So you won’t be surprised by what she says. They’re just words, nothing but words. At other times, she’s a woman of action. She has an amazing character, Sir."

"Quite a phenomenon, indeed, I should say," said Paul, ready to return to so interesting a person, but politely suffering Mr. Manlius to flow on, which he did uninterruptedly.

"Definitely quite a phenomenon, I must say," Paul remarked, eager to engage with such an interesting person, but politely allowing Mr. Manlius to continue speaking without interruption.

Doctor Chocker was the last to come. Miss Pix knew his infirmity, and contented herself with mute, but expressive signs, until the old gentleman could adjust his trumpet and receive her hearty congratulations. He jerked out a response, which Miss Pix received with as much delight as if he had flowed freely, like Mr. Manlius, who was now playing upon Mr. Le Clear an analysis of Nicholas's character, which he had read with unerring accuracy, as Mrs. Manlius testified by her continued, unreserved agreement. Indeed, the finding of his aunt by Nicholas in so unexpected a manner was the grand topic of the evening; and the four musical gentlemen, hearing the story in turn from each of the others, were now engaged in a sort of diatessaron, in which the four accounts were made to harmonize with considerable difficulty: Mr. Schmauker insisting upon his view, that Nicholas had arrived wet and hungry, was found on the doorstep, and dragged in by Mrs. Starkey; while Mr. Pfeffendorf and Mr. Pfeiffer substituted Mrs. Manlius for Mrs. Starkey; and Mr. Windgraff proposed an entirely new reading.

Doctor Chocker was the last to arrive. Miss Pix understood his condition and patiently made silent but expressive gestures until the elderly gentleman could set up his hearing trumpet and accept her warm congratulations. He managed to respond in a clipped manner, which Miss Pix received with as much joy as if he had spoken freely, like Mr. Manlius, who was busy analyzing Nicholas's character, which he had nailed perfectly, as Mrs. Manlius confirmed with her ongoing, open agreement. In fact, the discovery of Nicholas's aunt in such an unexpected way was the big topic of the night; and the four musical gentlemen, hearing the story from each other in turns, were now engaged in a kind of collaboration, trying to make their four versions fit together despite considerable difficulty. Mr. Schmauker insisted on his take that Nicholas showed up wet and hungry, found on the doorstep, and pulled inside by Mrs. Starkey; while Mr. Pfeffendorf and Mr. Pfeiffer switched Mrs. Manlius in for Mrs. Starkey; and Mr. Windgraff suggested an entirely different interpretation.

Dr. Chocker's entrance created a lull; and the introduction, performed in a general way by the hostess, brought little information to the rest, who were hoping to revise their list of names,—and very little to the Doctor, who looked about inquisitively, as Miss Pix dropped the company in a heap into his ear-trumpet. His eye lighted on Nicholas, and he went forward to meet him, to the astonishment of the company, who looked upon Nicholas as belonging exclusively to them. A new theory was at once broached by Mr. Windgraff to his companions, that Dr. Chocker had[Pg 35] brought about the recognition; but it lost credit as the Doctor began to question Nicholas, in an abrupt way, upon his presence there.

Dr. Chocker's arrival created a pause; and the introduction, done casually by the hostess, provided little information to the others, who were hoping to go over their list of names,—and very little to the Doctor, who looked around curiously as Miss Pix dropped the group into his ear-trumpet. His gaze landed on Nicholas, and he walked over to greet him, astonishing the guests, who viewed Nicholas as someone who belonged solely to them. A new theory was immediately suggested by Mr. Windgraff to his friends, that Dr. Chocker had[Pg 35] facilitated the recognition; but it lost credibility as the Doctor began to abruptly question Nicholas about why he was there.

"Didn't know I should meet you again, young man," said he. "But you don't take my advice, eh? or you wouldn't have been here. But I'm setting you a pretty example! This isn't the way to study the value of words, eh, Mr.—Mr.—Le Clear?"

"Didn’t realize I’d be seeing you again, young man," he said. "But you’re not taking my advice, are you? Or you wouldn’t be here. But I’m showing you a good example! This isn’t how to learn the value of words, right, Mr.—Mr.—Le Clear?"

The real Mr. Le Clear and his fiction looked at each other, and by a rapid interchange of glances signified their inability to extricate themselves from the snarl, except by a dangerous cut, which Nicholas had not the courage at the moment to give. The rest of the company were mystified; and Mr. Manlius, pocketing the character which he had just been giving, free of charge, to his new acquaintance, turned to his wife, and whispered awfully, "An impostor, Caroline!" Mrs. Manlius looked anxiously and frightened back to him; but he again whispered, "Wait for further developments, Caroline!" and she sank into a state of terrified curiosity. Fortunately, Mrs. Starkey was at the moment confiding much that was irrelevant to Mr. Le Clear the actual, who did not call her attention to the words. The four musical gentlemen were divided upon the accuracy of their hearing.

The real Mr. Le Clear and his fictional counterpart exchanged quick glances, silently acknowledging their inability to escape the situation without taking a risky choice, which Nicholas wasn't brave enough to make at that moment. The rest of the group was confused, and Mr. Manlius, putting away the persona he had just been showcasing free of charge to his new friend, leaned toward his wife and whispered dramatically, "An impostor, Caroline!" Mrs. Manlius looked back at him anxiously and scared, but he continued to whisper, "Wait for more developments, Caroline!" She settled into a state of anxious curiosity. Luckily, Mrs. Starkey was at that moment sharing a lot of irrelevant information with the real Mr. Le Clear, who didn’t draw her attention to her words. The four musical gentlemen were split on whether they had heard correctly.

Miss Pix, who had been bustling about, unconscious of the mystery, now created a diversion by saying, somewhat flurried by the silence that followed her first words,—

Miss Pix, who had been busy moving around, unaware of the mystery, now broke the silence by saying, a bit flustered by the quiet that came after her first words,—

"Our musical friends have brought a pleasant little surprise for us; but, Mr. Pfeiffer, won't you explain the Children's Symphony to the performers?"

"Our musical friends have brought a delightful little surprise for us; but, Mr. Pfeiffer, could you explain the Children's Symphony to the performers?"

Everybody at once made a note of Mr. Pfeiffer, and put a private mark on him for future reference; while he good-humoredly, and with embarrassing English, explained that Miss Pix had proposed that the company should produce Haydn's Children's Symphony, in which the principal parts were sustained by four stringed instruments, which he and his friends would play; while children's toy-instruments, which the other three were now busily taking out of a box, would be distributed among the rest of the company; and Miss Pix would act as leader, designating to each his or her part, and time of playing.

Everyone immediately took note of Mr. Pfeiffer and marked him for future reference. He cheerfully, though awkwardly in English, explained that Miss Pix had suggested the group should perform Haydn's Children's Symphony, where the main parts would be played by four string instruments, which he and his friends would handle. Meanwhile, the other three were busy unpacking children's toy instruments from a box to be handed out to the rest of the group. Miss Pix would lead, assigning each person their part and when to play.

The proposal created considerable confusion in the company, especially when the penny-trumpet, drum, cuckoo, night-owl, quail, rattle, and whistle were exhibited, and gleefully tried by the four musical friends. Mr. Manlius eyed the penny-trumpet which was offered him with a doubtful air, but concluded to sacrifice his dignity for the good of the company. Mrs. Manlius received her cuckoo nervously, as if it would break forth in spite of her, and looked askance at Nicholas to see if he would dare to take the night-owl into his perjured hands. He did take it with great good-humor, and, at Miss Pix's request, undertook to persuade Doctor Chocker to blow the whistle. He had first to give a digest of Mr. Pfeiffer's speech into the ear-trumpet, and, it is feared, would have failed to bring the Doctor round without Miss Pix, who came up at the critical moment, and told him that she knew he must have known how when he was a boy, accompanied with such persuasive frolicking that the Doctor at once signified his consent and his proficiency by blowing a blast into Nicholas's ear, whom he regarded as a special enemy on good terms with him, to the great merriment of all.

The proposal caused a lot of confusion in the company, especially when the penny trumpet, drum, cuckoo, night owl, quail, rattle, and whistle were showcased and enthusiastically tried out by the four musical friends. Mr. Manlius looked at the penny trumpet that was offered to him with a skeptical expression but decided to put his dignity aside for the sake of the group. Mrs. Manlius nervously accepted her cuckoo, as if it might go off unexpectedly, and gave Nicholas a sideways glance to see if he would dare to take the night owl into his traitorous hands. He took it with good humor and, at Miss Pix's urging, tried to convince Doctor Chocker to blow the whistle. First, he had to summarize Mr. Pfeiffer's speech into the ear trumpet, and it's feared he might not have succeeded in getting the Doctor to join without Miss Pix, who appeared at just the right moment and reminded him that he must have known how to do it as a boy, with such playful enthusiasm that the Doctor immediately agreed and demonstrated his skills by blowing a blast into Nicholas's ear, whom he viewed as a friendly rival, much to everyone's amusement.

The signal was given, and the company looked at Miss Pix, awaiting their turn with anxious solicitude. The symphony passed off quite well, though Mr. Le Clear, who managed the drum, was the only one who kept perfect time. Mrs. Starkey, who held the rattle aloft, sprung it at the first sound of the music, and continued to spring it in spite of the expostulations and laughter of the others. Mrs. Manlius, unable to follow Miss Pix's excited gestures, turned to her husband, and uttered the cuckoo's doleful note whenever he blew his trumpet, which he did deliberately at regular intervals. The effect, however, was admirable; and as the entire company was in the orchestra, the mutual satisfaction[Pg 36] was perfect, and the piece was encored vociferously, to the delight of little Miss Pix, who enjoyed without limit the melting of her company, which was now going on rapidly. It continued even when the music had stopped, and Gretchen, very red, but intensely interested, brought in some coffee and cakes, which she distributed under Miss Pix's direction. Nicholas shared the good lady's pleasure, and addressed himself to his aunt with increased attention, taking good care to avoid Doctor Chocker, who submitted more graciously than would be supposed to a steady play from Mr. Manlius' hose. Mr. Pfeiffer and his three musical friends made themselves merry with Mrs. Manlius and Miss Pix, while Mr. Le Clear walked about performing chemical experiments upon the whole company.

The signal was given, and the group looked at Miss Pix, waiting their turn with eager anticipation. The symphony went quite well, though Mr. Le Clear, who played the drums, was the only one keeping perfect time. Mrs. Starkey, who held the rattle up high, shook it at the first sound of the music and kept shaking it despite the protests and laughter from the others. Mrs. Manlius, unable to follow Miss Pix's excited gestures, turned to her husband and imitated a cuckoo's sad call whenever he blew his trumpet, which he did intentionally at regular intervals. The effect, however, was fantastic; and since the entire group was in the orchestra, everyone was completely satisfied, and the piece got a loud encore, much to the delight of little Miss Pix, who thoroughly enjoyed the camaraderie that was rapidly unfolding. It continued even after the music had stopped, and Gretchen, very red but deeply engaged, brought in some coffee and cakes, which she served under Miss Pix's direction. Nicholas shared the lady's joy and paid more attention to his aunt, making sure to steer clear of Doctor Chocker, who took Mr. Manlius' persistent hose play more graciously than one might expect. Mr. Pfeiffer and his three musical friends had fun with Mrs. Manlius and Miss Pix, while Mr. Le Clear walked around conducting chemical experiments on the whole group.

And now Miss Pix, who had been all the while glowing more and more with sunshine in her face, again addressed the company, and said:—

And now Miss Pix, who had been getting brighter and brighter with sunlight on her face, spoke to the group again and said:—

"I think the best thing should be kept till toward the end; and I've got a scheme that I want you all to help me in. We're all neighbors here,"—and she looked round upon the company with a smile that grew broader, while they all looked surprised, and began to smile back in ignorant sympathy, except Doctor Chocker, who did not hear a word, and refused to smile till he knew what it was for. "Yes, we are all neighbors. Doctor Chocker lives in Number Two; Mr. and Mrs. Manlius, Mrs. Starkey, and Mr. Judge are from Number Three; my musical friends live within easy call; and I live in Number Five."

"I believe the best should be saved for last, and I have an idea that I want all of you to help me with. We're all neighbors here,"—and she glanced around at the group with a smile that grew wider, while they all looked surprised and began to return her smile in clueless sympathy, except for Doctor Chocker, who didn’t catch a word and wouldn’t smile until he figured out what was going on. "Yes, we are all neighbors. Doctor Chocker is in Number Two; Mr. and Mrs. Manlius, Mrs. Starkey, and Mr. Judge are from Number Three; my musical friends are close by; and I live in Number Five."

Here she looked round again triumphantly, and found them all properly astonished, and apparently very contented, except Doctor Chocker, who was immovable. Nicholas expressed the most marked surprise, as became so hypocritical a prime-minister, causing Mr. Manlius to make a private note of some unrevealed perjury.

Here she looked around again triumphantly and found them all genuinely surprised and seemingly very pleased, except for Doctor Chocker, who remained unmoved. Nicholas showed the most noticeable surprise, fitting for such a hypocritical prime minister, prompting Mr. Manlius to jot down a private note of some undisclosed wrongdoing.

"Now," said Miss Pix, pausing and arresting the profound attention of all, "now, who lives at Number Four?"

"Now," said Miss Pix, pausing and capturing everyone's full attention, "who lives at Number Four?"

If she expected an answer, it was plainly not locked up in the breast of any one before her. But she did not expect an answer; she was determined to give that herself, and she continued:—

If she was looking for an answer, it was clearly not hidden in anyone standing in front of her. But she didn’t expect an answer; she was set on providing that herself, and she continued:—

"There is a most excellent woman there, Mrs. Blake, whom I should have liked very much to introduce to you to-night, especially as it is her birthday. Isn't she fortunate to have been born on Christmas-eve? Well, I didn't ask her, because she is not able to leave her room. There she has sat, or lain, for fifteen years! She's a confirmed invalid; but she can see her friends. And now for my little scheme. I want to give her a surprise-party from all her neighbors, and I want to give it now. It's all right. Gretchen has seen her maid, and Mrs. Blake knows just enough to be willing to have me bring a few friends."

"There’s an amazing woman here, Mrs. Blake, who I would have loved to introduce you to tonight, especially since it’s her birthday. Isn’t she lucky to have been born on Christmas Eve? Well, I didn’t ask her because she can’t leave her room. She’s been sitting or lying there for fifteen years! She’s a long-term invalid, but she can still see her friends. Now, here’s my little plan. I want to throw her a surprise party with all her neighbors, and I want to do it now. It’s all set. Gretchen has talked to her maid, and Mrs. Blake knows just enough to be happy about a few friends coming over."

Miss Pix looked about, with a little anxiety peeping out of her good-souled, eager face. But the company was so melted down that she could now mould it at pleasure, and no opposition was made. Mr. Manlius volunteered to enlighten Doctor Chocker; but he made so long a preamble that the old scholar turned, with considerable impatience, to Miss Pix, who soon put him in good-humor, and secured his coöperation, though not without his indulging in some sinful and unneighborly remarks to Nicholas.

Miss Pix looked around, a bit anxious showing on her kind, eager face. But the group had become so relaxed that she could now shape it as she wished, and there was no resistance. Mr. Manlius offered to explain things to Doctor Chocker, but his lengthy introduction made the old scholar turn, somewhat impatiently, to Miss Pix. She quickly lightened his mood and got his cooperation, although he couldn’t help making some unkind and unneighborly comments to Nicholas.

It proved unnecessary to go into the court, for these two housed happened to have a connection, which Miss Pix made use of, the door having been left open all the evening, that Mrs. Blake might catch some whiffs of the entertainment. Gretchen appeared in the doorway, bearing on a salver a great cake, made with her own hands, having Mrs. Blake's initials, in colored letters, on the frosting, and the whole surrounded by fifty little wax tapers, indicating her age, which all counted, and all counted differently, giving opportunity to the four musical friends to enter upon a fresh and lively discussion. The party was marshalled by Miss Pix in the order of houses, while she herself[Pg 37] squeezed past them all on the staircase, to usher them into Mrs. Blake's presence.

It turned out that going into the court wasn't needed, because these two houses had a connection that Miss Pix took advantage of, since the door had been left open all evening for Mrs. Blake to catch some sounds of the gathering. Gretchen showed up in the doorway, carrying a big cake on a tray that she made herself, with Mrs. Blake's initials written in colored letters on the frosting, surrounded by fifty little wax candles representing her age, which were all present and counted differently, setting the stage for the four musical friends to dive into a lively discussion. Miss Pix organized the party according to the houses, while she herself[Pg 37] squeezed past everyone on the staircase to bring them into Mrs. Blake's presence.

Mrs. Blake was sitting in her reclining-chair as Miss Pix entered with her retinue. The room was in perfect order, and had about it such an air of neatness and purity that one felt one's self in a haven of rest upon crossing the threshold. The invalid sat quiet and at ease, looking forth upon the scene before her as if so safely moored that no troubling of the elements could ever reach her. Here had she lived, year after year, almost alone with herself, though now the big-souled little music-teacher was her constant visitor; but the entrance of all her neighbors seemed in no wise to agitate her placid demeanor. She greeted Miss Pix with a pleased smile; and all being now in the room, the bustling little woman, at the very zenith of her sunny course, took her stand and said,—

Mrs. Blake was sitting in her recliner when Miss Pix walked in with her entourage. The room was immaculate, giving off such an air of neatness and purity that it felt like a haven of rest as soon as you stepped inside. The invalid was calm and relaxed, observing her surroundings as if she were safely anchored, untouched by any turbulence. She had lived here, year after year, mostly by herself, although the big-hearted little music teacher was her regular visitor; still, the arrival of any of her neighbors didn't seem to disturb her peaceful demeanor. She welcomed Miss Pix with a cheerful smile, and now that everyone was in the room, the energetic little woman, at the peak of her joyful spirit, took her place and said,—

"This is my company, dear Mrs. Blake. These are all neighbors of ours, living in the court, or close by. We have been having a right merry time, and now we can't break up without bringing you our good wishes,—our Christmas good wishes, and our birthday good wishes," said Miss Pix, with a little oratorical flourish, which brought Gretchen to the front with her illuminated cake, which she positively could not have held another moment, so heavy had it grown, even for her stout arms.

"This is my company, dear Mrs. Blake. These are all our neighbors, living in the court or nearby. We've been having a great time, and now we can't leave without sharing our good wishes—with our Christmas wishes and our birthday wishes," said Miss Pix, with a little dramatic flair, which brought Gretchen to the front with her decorated cake, which she definitely could not have held for another moment, as it had grown too heavy even for her strong arms.

Mrs. Blake laughed gently, and with a delighted look examined the great cake, with her initials, and did not need to count the wax tapers. It was placed on a stand, and she said,—

Mrs. Blake laughed softly, and with a delighted expression, she examined the large cake with her initials on it, not needing to count the wax candles. It was set on a stand, and she said,—

"Now I should like to entertain my guests, and, if you will let me, I will give you each a piece of my cake,—for it all belongs to me, after Miss Pix's graceful presentation; and if Miss Pix will be so good, I will ask her to make me personally acquainted with each of you."

"Now I’d like to host my guests, and if you don’t mind, I’d love to share a piece of my cake with each of you, since it’s all mine after Miss Pix’s lovely presentation; and if Miss Pix can help, I’d like to ask her to introduce me to each of you."

So a knife was brought, and Mrs. Blake cut a generous piece, when Doctor Chocker was introduced, with great gesticulation on the part of Miss Pix.

So, a knife was brought, and Mrs. Blake cut a big piece, when Doctor Chocker was introduced, with a lot of gestures from Miss Pix.

"I am glad to see you, Doctor Chocker," said Mrs. Blake, distinctly, but quietly, into his trumpet. "Do you let your patients eat cake? Try this, and see if it isn't good for me."

"I’m glad to see you, Dr. Chocker," Mrs. Blake said clearly but softly into his trumpet. "Do you let your patients eat cake? Try this and see if it isn’t good for me."

"If I were a doctor of medicine," said he, jerkily, "I should bring my patients to see you"; at which Miss Pix nodded to him most vehemently, and the Doctor wagged his ear-trumpet in delight at the retort which he thought he had made.

"If I were a doctor," he said abruptly, "I would send my patients to see you"; to which Miss Pix nodded enthusiastically, and the Doctor happily waved his ear-trumpet at the clever comeback he believed he had made.

Mr. Le Clear was introduced, and took his cake gracefully, saying, "I hope another year will see you at a Christmas-party of Miss Pix's"; but Mrs. Blake smiled, and said, "This is my little lot of earth, and I am sure there is a patch of stars above."

Mr. Le Clear was introduced and accepted his cake with grace, saying, "I hope to see you at another Christmas party at Miss Pix's next year"; but Mrs. Blake smiled and replied, "This is my little piece of earth, and I'm sure there's a patch of stars above."

Mr. Manlius and wife came up together, he somewhat lumbering, as if Mrs. Blake's character were too much for his discernment, and Mrs. Manlius not quite sure of herself when her husband seemed embarrassed.

Mr. Manlius and his wife came up together, with him moving a bit awkwardly, as if Mrs. Blake's character was a bit beyond his understanding, and Mrs. Manlius feeling a little uncertain of herself when her husband appeared awkward.

"This is really too funny," said Mrs. Blake, merrily; "as if I were a very benevolent person, doling out my charity of cake on Christmas-eve. Do, Mr. Manlius, take a large piece; and I am sure your wife will take some home to the children."

"This is so funny," Mrs. Blake said cheerfully. "As if I were some kindhearted person, handing out my cake charity on Christmas Eve. Please, Mr. Manlius, have a big piece; I'm sure your wife will take some home for the kids."

"What wonderful insight!" said Mr. Manlius, turning about to Nicholas, and drawing in his breath. "We have children,—two. That woman has a deep character, Mr. Judge."

"What wonderful insight!" Mr. Manlius said, turning to Nicholas and taking a deep breath. "We have kids—two of them. That woman has a lot going on beneath the surface, Mr. Judge."

"Mrs. Starkey, also of Number Three," said the mistress of ceremonies; "and Mr. Nicholas Judge, arrived only this evening."

"Mrs. Starkey, who lives at Number Three," said the host; "and Mr. Nicholas Judge, who just arrived this evening."

"Nicholas Judge!" said Mrs. Blake, losing the color which the excitement had brought, and dropping the knife.

"Nicholas Judge!" Mrs. Blake exclaimed, losing the color that the excitement had brought to her face and dropping the knife.

"My nephew," explained Mrs. Starkey. "Just came this evening, and found me at home. Never saw him before. Must tell you all about it." And she was plunging with alacrity into the delightful subject, with all its variations.

"My nephew," Mrs. Starkey explained. "He just came over this evening and found me at home. I’ve never seen him before. I have to tell you all about it." And she eagerly dove into the delightful topic, covering all its details.

Mrs. Blake looked at Nicholas, while the color came and went in her cheeks.

Mrs. Blake looked at Nicholas as the color rose and fell in her cheeks.

"Stop!" said she, decisively, to Mrs. Starkey, and half rising, she leaned forward[Pg 38] to Nicholas, and said rapidly, with an energy which seemed to be summoned from every part of her system,—

"Stop!" she said firmly to Mrs. Starkey, and as she half rose, she leaned forward[Pg 38] to Nicholas and said quickly, with an energy that seemed to come from every part of her being,—

"Are you the son of Alice Brown?"

"Are you Alice Brown's kid?"

"Yes, yes," said Nicholas, tumultuously; "and you,—you are her sister. Here, take this miniature"; and he snatched one from his breast. "Is not this she? It is my mother. You are my Aunt Eunice," he exclaimed, as she sank back in her chair exhausted, but reaching out her arms to him.

"Yes, yes," said Nicholas, excitedly. "And you—you’re her sister. Here, take this small portrait"; and he pulled one from his chest. "Isn’t this her? It’s my mom. You’re my Aunt Eunice," he shouted, as she leaned back in her chair, worn out but reaching out her arms to him.

"That young man is a base impostor!" said Mr. Manlius aloud, with his hand in his waistcoat; while Mrs. Manlius looked on deprecatingly, but as if too, too aware of the sad fact. "I said so to my wife in private,—I read it in his face,—and now I declare it publicly. That man is a base impostor!"

"That young man is a complete fraud!" Mr. Manlius exclaimed loudly, with his hand in his vest; while Mrs. Manlius watched with a disapproving look, but as if she also knew all too well the unfortunate truth. "I mentioned this to my wife in private—I could see it in his face—and now I’m saying it out loud. That man is a complete fraud!"

"Dear, dear, I don't understand it at all!" said the unfortunate Mrs. Starkey. "I thought, to be sure, that Nicholas was my nephew. Never saw him before, but he said he was; and now, now, I don't know what I shall do!" and the poor lady, suddenly bereft of her fortune, began to wipe her moist eyes; "but perhaps," she added, with a bright, though transient gleam of hope, "we are both aunts to him."

"Dear, dear, I don't get it at all!" said the unfortunate Mrs. Starkey. "I really thought Nicholas was my nephew. I've never seen him before, but he said he was; and now, now I don't know what I’m going to do!" The poor lady, suddenly without her fortune, began to wipe her tearful eyes; "but maybe," she added, with a brief spark of hope, "we are both aunts to him."

"That cannot be," said Nicholas, kindly, who left his aunt to set the company right, if possible. "My dear friend," he said, taking Mrs. Starkey's hand, "it has been a mistake, brought on by my heedlessness. I knew only that my aunt's name had been Eunice Brown. It chanced that yours was the same name. I happened to come upon you first in my search, and did not dream it possible that there could be two in the same court. Everything seemed to tally; and I was too pleased at finding the only relation I had in the wide world to ask many questions. But when I saw that my aunt knew who I was, and I saw my mother's features in hers, I perceived my mistake at once. We will remain friends, though,—shall we not?"

"That can't be," said Nicholas kindly, leaving his aunt to sort things out, if she could. "My dear friend," he said, taking Mrs. Starkey's hand, "this was a mistake, caused by my carelessness. I only knew that my aunt's name was Eunice Brown. It just happened that yours was the same name. I ran into you first during my search, and I never thought there could be two with the same name in the same court. Everything seemed to match up, and I was so happy to find my only relative in the whole world that I didn’t ask many questions. But when I saw that my aunt recognized me, and I noticed my mom’s features in her, I realized my mistake right away. We'll still be friends, won’t we?"

Mrs. Starkey was too much bewildered to refuse any compromise; but Mr. Manlius stepped forward, having his claim as a private officer of justice.

Mrs. Starkey was too confused to reject any compromise; but Mr. Manlius stepped forward, asserting his position as a private officer of justice.

"I must still demand an explanation, Sir, how it is that in this mixed assembly the learned Doctor Chocker addresses you as Mr. Le Clear, and you do not decline the title"; and Mr. Manlius looked, as if for a witness, to Doctor Chocker, who was eating his cake with great solemnity, holding his ear-trumpet in hopes of catching an occasional word.

"I still need an explanation, Sir, about why, in this mixed gathering, the learned Doctor Chocker calls you Mr. Le Clear, and you don't correct him"; and Mr. Manlius glanced at Doctor Chocker, who was solemnly eating his cake while trying to hear the conversation with his ear-trumpet.

"That would require too long an explanation," said Nicholas, smiling; "but you shall have it some time in private. Mr. Le Clear himself will no doubt tell you"; which Mr. Le Clear, an amused spectator of the scene, cheerfully promised to do.

"That would take too long to explain," said Nicholas, smiling; "but I'll share it with you sometime in private. Mr. Le Clear here will probably fill you in," which Mr. Le Clear, an amused observer of the scene, happily promised to do.

The company had been so stirred up by this revelation, that they came near retreating at once to Miss Pix's to talk it over, to the dismay of the four musical gentlemen, who had not yet been presented, and especially who had not yet got any cake. Miss Pix, though in a transport of joy, had an eye for everything, and, discovering this, insisted on presenting them in a body to Mrs. Blake, in consideration of her fatigue. They bowed simultaneously, and stood before her like bashful schoolboys; while Nicholas assumed the knife in behalf of his aunt, distributing with equal liberality, when they retired in high glee over the new version of his history, which Mr. Windgraff, for the sake of displaying his acumen, stoutly declared to be spurious. Gretchen also was served with a monstrous slice; and then the company bade good-bye to the aunt and nephew, who began anew their glad recognition.

The company was so shaken by this revelation that they almost rushed over to Miss Pix's to discuss it, much to the disappointment of the four musical gentlemen, who hadn't been introduced yet and, more importantly, hadn’t gotten any cake. Miss Pix, although overwhelmed with joy, was attentive to everything and, noticing the situation, insisted on presenting them all to Mrs. Blake, considering she was tired. They bowed at the same time and stood in front of her like shy schoolboys, while Nicholas took the knife on behalf of his aunt, generously serving them cake. They left in high spirits, excited about the new version of his story, which Mr. Windgraff, eager to show off his intelligence, confidently claimed was fake. Gretchen also received a huge slice, and then the group said goodbye to the aunt and nephew, who happily continued their warm reunion.

It was a noisy set of people who left Miss Pix's house. That little lady stood in the doorway, and sent off each with such a merry blessing that it lasted long after the doors of the other houses were closed. Even the forlorn Mrs. Starkey seemed to go back almost as happy as when she had issued forth in the evening with her newly found nephew. The sudden gleam of hope which his unlooked-for coming had let in upon a toilsome[Pg 39] and thankless life—for we know more about her position in Mr. Manlius's household than we have been at liberty to disclose—had, indeed, gone out in darkness; but the Christmas merriment, and the kindness which for one evening had flowed around her, had so fertilized one little spot in her life, that, however dreary her pilgrimage, nothing could destroy the bright oasis. It gave hope of others, too, no less verdant; and with this hope uppermost in her confused brain the lonely widow entered the land of Christmas dreams. Let us hope, too, that the pachydermatous Mr. Manlius felt the puncture of her disappointment, and that Miss Pix's genial warmth had made him cast off a little the cloak of selfishness in which he had wrapped himself; for what else could have made him say to his echoing wife that night, "Caroline, suppose we let Eunice take the children to the panorama to-morrow. It's a quarter more; but she was rather disappointed about that young fellow"? The learned Doctor Chocker, who had, in all his days, never found a place to compare with his crowded study for satisfaction to his soul, for the first time now, as he entered it, admitted to himself that Miss Pix's arbor-like parlor and Mrs. Blake's simple room had something that his lacked; and in the frozen little bedroom where he nightly shivered, in rigid obedience to some fancied laws of health, the old man was aware of some kindly influence thawing away the chill frost-work which he had suffered to sheathe his heart. Nor did Mr. Le Clear toast his slippered feet before his cheery fire without an uncomfortable misgiving that his philosophy hardly compassed the sphere of life.

A noisy group of people left Miss Pix's house. The little lady stood in the doorway, sending each of them off with such a cheerful blessing that it lingered long after the doors of the other houses were closed. Even the downcast Mrs. Starkey appeared to return almost as happy as when she had come out in the evening with her newly found nephew. The sudden burst of hope that his unexpected arrival had brought into her hard and thankless life—for we know more about her situation in Mr. Manlius's household than we can share—had indeed faded into darkness; but the Christmas joy and the kindness that surrounded her for just one evening had nurtured a small part of her life, so that, no matter how bleak her journey, nothing could erase that bright oasis. It promised the possibility of more such moments, too, just as vibrant; and with this hope swirling in her confused mind, the lonely widow stepped into the realm of Christmas dreams. Let’s also hope that the thick-skinned Mr. Manlius felt the sting of her disappointment, and that Miss Pix's warm nature encouraged him to shed a bit of the selfishness he had wrapped himself in; for what else could have prompted him to say to his echoing wife that night, “Caroline, why don’t we let Eunice take the kids to the panorama tomorrow? It’s a quarter more; but she was pretty disappointed about that young guy”? The learned Doctor Chocker, who had never found anywhere as satisfying for his soul as his crowded study, for the first time admitted to himself that Miss Pix's garden-like parlor and Mrs. Blake's simple room had something his lacked; and in the chilly little bedroom where he shivered each night, rigidly following some imagined health rules, the old man sensed a warm influence melting away the cold frost that had clung to his heart. Nor did Mr. Le Clear warm his slippered feet by his cheerful fire without an unsettling feeling that his philosophy barely encompassed the breadth of life.

Christmas-eve in the court was over. Strange things had happened; and, for one night at least, the Five Sisters had acted as one family. Little Miss Pix, reviewing the evening, as she dropped off to sleep, could not help rubbing her hands together, and emitting little chuckles. Such a delightful evening as she had had! and meaning to surprise others, she had herself been taken into a better surprise still; and here, recollecting the happy union of the lone, but not lonely, Mrs. Blake with a child of her old age, as it were, Miss Pix must laugh aloud just as the midnight clock was sounding. Bless her neighborly soul, she has ushered in Christmas-day with her laugh of good-will toward men. The whole hymn of the angels is in her heart; and with it let her sleep till the glorious sunshine awakes her.

Christmas Eve in the court was done. Weird things had happened, and for one night at least, the Five Sisters had acted like a family. Little Miss Pix, thinking back on the evening as she drifted off to sleep, couldn't help rubbing her hands together and giving little chuckles. What a delightful evening she had! Planning to surprise others, she ended up being surprised herself—and as she recalled the joyful union of the lonely but not lonely Mrs. Blake with a child in her old age, Miss Pix couldn't help but laugh out loud just as the midnight clock struck. Bless her neighborly heart, she welcomed Christmas Day with her laugh of goodwill toward everyone. The whole hymn of the angels resides in her heart; with that, let her sleep until the glorious sunshine wakes her.


ICE AND ESQUIMAUX.

CHAPTER II.

THE ICE IN ITS GLORY.

June 17.—On this anniversary of the Battle of Bunker's Hill we sailed from Sleupe Harbor. Little Mecatina, with its blue perspective and billowy surface, lifted itself up astern under flooding sunshine to tell us that this relentless coast could have a glory of its own; but we looked at it with dreamy, forgetful eyes, thinking of the dear land, now all tossed into wild surge and crimson spray of war, which, how far soever away, is ever present to the hearts of her true children.

June 17.—On the anniversary of the Battle of Bunker Hill, we set sail from Sleupe Harbor. Little Mecatina, with its blue view and rolling surface, rose behind us in the bright sunshine, reminding us that this rugged coast could have its own beauty. But we gazed at it with dreamy, distant eyes, thinking of our beloved homeland, now lost in the chaotic surge and red spray of war, which, no matter how far away, is always on the minds of its loyal people.

Next day we dropped into the harbor of Caribou Island, a mission-station, and left again on the 20th, after a quiet Sunday,—Bradford having gone with others to church, and come back much moved by the bronze-faced earnestness, and rough-voiced, deep-chested hymning of the fisherman congregation. Far[Pg 40] ahead we saw the strait full of ice. Not that the ice itself could be seen; but the peculiar, blue-white, vertical striæ, which stuccoed the sky far along the horizon, told experienced eyes that ice was there. Away to the right towered the long heights of Newfoundland, intensely blue, save where, over large spaces, they shone white with snow. They surprised us by their great elevation, and by the sharp and straight escarpments with which they descended. Here and there was a gorge cut through as with a saw. We then took all this in good faith, on the fair testimony of our eyes. But experience brought instruction,—as it will in superficial matters, whether in deeper ones or no. In truth, this appearance was chiefly a mirage caused by ice.

The next day, we stopped at the harbor of Caribou Island, a mission station, and left again on the 20th, after a quiet Sunday. Bradford had gone to church with some others and returned deeply moved by the serious, bronze-faced worship and the rough-voiced, powerful singing of the fishermen's congregation. Far ahead, we could see the strait filled with ice. Not that we could see the ice itself; the distinct blue-white vertical streaks on the horizon told experienced eyes that ice was present. To the right, the long heights of Newfoundland rose sharply, a deep blue except where large areas glimmered white with snow. We were surprised by their great elevation and the sharp, straight cliffs descending from them. Here and there, gorges cut through the landscape as if sawed. At that moment, we accepted everything we saw as truth. But experience teaches us—whether in simple matters or more profound ones. In reality, this sight was mainly an optical illusion caused by the ice.

For, of all solemn prank-players, of all mystifiers and magicians, ice is the greatest. Coming out of its silent and sovereign dreamland in the North, it brings its wand, and goes wizard-working down the coast. A spell is about it; enchantment is upon it like a garment; weirdness and illusion are the breath of its nostrils. Above it, along the horizon, is a strange columned wall, an airy Giant's Causeway, pale blue, paling through ethereal gray into snow. Islands quit the sea, and become islands in the sky, sky-foam and spray seen along their bases. Hills shoot out from their summits airy capes and headlands, or assume upon their crowns a wide, smooth table, as if for the service of genii. Ships sail, bergs float, in the heavens. Here a vast obelisk of ice shoots aloft, half mountain high; you gaze at it amazed, ecstatic,—calculating the time it will take to come up with it,—whistling, if you are still capable of that levity, for a wind. But now it begins to waver, to dance slowly, to shoot up minarets and take them back, to put forth arms which change into wands, wave and disappear; and ere your wonder has found a voice, it rolls itself together like a scroll, drops nearly to the ocean-level, and is but a gigantic ice-floe after all!

For of all the serious pranksters, all the mystifiers and magicians, ice is the greatest. Coming out of its quiet and majestic dreamland in the North, it brings its wand and starts casting spells down the coast. There’s an enchantment about it; magic surrounds it like a cloak; strangeness and illusion fill its air. Above it, along the horizon, stands a bizarre columned wall, like a floating Giant’s Causeway, light blue fading through airy gray into white. Islands seem to rise from the sea and hang in the sky, with clouds and spray visible at their bases. Hills stretch out from their peaks, forming lofty cliffs and headlands, or develop wide, smooth surfaces on their tops, almost as if prepared for the service of genies. Ships sail, icebergs drift in the sky. Suddenly, a massive ice obelisk rises high, appearing mountain-like; you stare at it, amazed and ecstatic—calculating how long it will take to catch up with it—whistling, if you can still manage that cheerfulness, for a breeze. But now it starts to wobble, to sway gently, to shoot up minarets and pull them back, to extend arms that transform into wands, waving and vanishing; and before your astonishment can find words, it rolls itself up like a scroll, drops almost to sea level, and reveals itself to be just a gigantic ice floe after all!

The day fell calm; a calm evening came; the sea lay in soft, shining undulation, not urgent enough to exasperate the drooping sails. The ship rose and declined like a sleeper's pulse. We were all under a spell. Soon the moon, then at her full, came up, elongating herself laterally into an oval, whose breadth was not more than three fifths its length; her shine on the water likewise stretching along the horizon, sweet and fair like childhood, not a ray touching the shadowed water between. Presently, as if she discerned and did not disdain us,—wiser than "positive philosophers" in her estimate of man,—she gathered together her spreading shine, and threw it down toward us in a glade of scarcely more than her own breadth, of even width, and sharply defined at the sides. It was a regular roadway on the water, intensest gold verging upon orange, edged with an exquisite, delicate tint of scarlet, running straight and firm as a Roman road all the way from the meeting-place of sky and sea to the ship. Or rather, not quite to the ship; for, when near at hand, it broke off into golden globes, which, under the influence of the light swell, came towards us by softly sudden leaps, deepening and deepening as they came, till at the last leap they disappeared, more shining than ever, far down in the liquid, lucent heart of the sea. It was impossible to feel that these had faded, so triumphant was their close. Rather, one felt that they had been elected to a more glorious office,—had gone, perhaps, to light some hall of Thetis, or some divine, spotless revel of sea-nymphs.

The day was calm; a peaceful evening arrived; the sea lay in gentle, shining waves, not urgent enough to annoy the drooping sails. The ship rose and fell like a sleeping person’s pulse. We were all under a spell. Soon, the full moon rose, stretching herself sideways into an oval, her width just about three-fifths of her length; her light on the water also spread along the horizon, sweet and beautiful like childhood, with not a single ray touching the shadowed water in between. Then, as though she noticed us and didn't overlook us—wiser than "positive philosophers" in her view of humanity—she gathered her wide glow and directed it down toward us in a path just a bit wider than herself, evenly shaped, sharply defined on the edges. It was a straight, clear path on the water, the richest gold tinted with orange, bordered by a delicate touch of scarlet, running straight and solid like a Roman road all the way from the meeting point of sky and sea to the ship. Or rather, not exactly to the ship; because, when it got close, it broke off into golden orbs that, with the slight swell, gently bounced toward us, getting deeper and deeper as they came, until with the last bounce they disappeared, shining brighter than ever, deep down in the clear, luminous heart of the sea. It was impossible to feel that they had vanished, so triumphant was their end. Instead, one felt that they had been chosen for a more glorious purpose—perhaps to illuminate some hall of Thetis, or some pure, divine gathering of sea-nymphs.

I had gone below, when, at about ten o'clock, there was a hail from the deck.

I had gone below when, around ten o'clock, there was a call from the deck.

"Come up and see a crack in the water!"

"Come up and check out a crack in the water!"

"A what?"

"A what now?"

"A crack in the water!"

"A break in the water!"

"Not joking?"

"Are you serious?"

"No, indeed; come and see."

"No way; come check it out."

Up quickly! this is the day of wonders! It was a line of brilliant phosphorescence, exceedingly brilliant, about two inches wide, perfectly sharp at the edges, which extended along the side of the ship, and ahead and astern out of[Pg 41] sight. "Crack in the water" is the seaman's name for it. I have been a full year on the water, but never saw it save this once, and had never heard of it before.

Get up quickly! This is a day of wonders! There was a brilliant line of phosphorescence, extremely bright, about two inches wide and perfectly sharp at the edges, stretching along the side of the ship and further out of[Pg 41] sight. "Crack in the water" is what sailors call it. I've spent a whole year at sea, but I've never seen it before, and I hadn’t even heard of it before today.

At half past eleven, the Parson and I went on deck, and read ordinary print as rapidly as by daylight. It took some ten seconds to get accustomed to the light, being fresh from the glare of the kerosene lamp; but afterwards we read aloud to each other with entire ease and fluency.

At 11:30, the Parson and I went on deck and read regular print just as quickly as in daylight. It took about ten seconds to get used to the light since we had just come from the bright kerosene lamp, but after that, we read aloud to each other with complete ease and fluency.

At a quarter past two, Captain Handy, a man made of fine material, with an eye for the beautiful as well as for right-whales, broke my sleep with a gentle touch, and whispered, "Come on deck, and see what a morning it is." What a morning, indeed! Thanks, old comrade! Call me next time, when there is such to see; and if I am too weak to get out of my berth, take me up in those strong arms, across that broad, billow-like chest of yours, and bear me to the deck!

At 2:15, Captain Handy, a remarkable man who appreciated both beauty and right whales, woke me up with a gentle nudge and said, "Come on deck and see what a morning it is." What a morning it was! Thanks, my friend! Next time, let me know when there's something this incredible to see; and if I'm too weak to get out of bed, just pick me up with those strong arms of yours and carry me to the deck across that broad, wave-like chest!

It was dead calm,—no, live calm, rather; for never was calm so vivid. The swell had fallen; but the sea breathes and lives even in its sleep. Dawn was already blushing, "celestial rosy red, love's proper hue," in the—east, I was about to say, but north would be truer. The centre of its roseate arch was not more than a point (by compass) east of north. The lofty shore rose clear, dark, and sharp against the morning red; the sea was white,—white as purity, and still as peace; the moon hung opposite, clothed and half hidden in a glorified mist; a schooner lay moveless, dark-sailed, transformed into a symbol of solitude and silence, beneath. I thought of the world's myriad sleepers, and would fain have played Captain Handy to them all. But Nature is infinitely rich, and can afford to draw costly curtains about the slumber of her darling. For, without man, she were a mother ever in anguish of travail, and ever wanting a child to nurse with entire joy at her breast. Sleep on, man, while, with shadows and stars, with dying and dawning of day, not forgetting sombreness of cloud and passion of storm, the eternal mother dignifies your slumber, and waits till her two suns arise and shine together!

It was completely calm—no, it was more like a vibrant calm, because I've never seen calm so vivid. The waves had settled down, but the sea still breathes and lives even while it's asleep. Dawn was already blushing, "celestial rosy red, love's perfect color," in the—east, I was about to say, but north would be more accurate. The center of its rosy arch was no more than a point (by compass) east of north. The tall shore stood out clear, dark, and sharp against the morning red; the sea was white—white as purity, and still as peace; the moon hung opposite, draped and partially hidden in a glorious mist; a dark-sailed schooner lay motionless below, turned into a symbol of solitude and silence. I thought of all the sleepers in the world and wished I could be Captain Handy to them all. But Nature is incredibly rich and can afford to draw expensive curtains around the slumber of her beloved. For without humans, she would be a mother forever in the pain of childbirth, always needing a child to nurture with complete joy at her breast. Sleep on, man, while, with shadows and stars, with the dying and rising of day, not forgetting the somberness of clouds and the passion of storms, the eternal mother dignifies your sleep and waits for her two suns to rise and shine together!

Morning,—ice, worlds of it, the wide straits all full! A light wind had been fanning us for the last two or three hours; and now the ice lay fair in view, just ahead. We had not calculated upon meeting it here. At Port Mulgrave they told us that the last of it had passed through with a rush about a week before. Bradford was delighted, and quickly got out his photographic sickle to reap this unexpected harvest: for the wise man had brought along with him a fine apparatus and a skilful photographer. In an hour or two the schooner was up with it, and finding it tolerably open, while the wind was a zephyr, and the sea smooth as a pond, we entered into its midst. Water-fowl—puffins, murres, duck, and the like—hung about it, furnishing preliminary employment to those of our number who sought sport or specimens. It was a delightsome day, the whole of it: atmosphere rare, pure, perfect; sun-splendor in deluge; land, a cloud of blue and snow on one side, and a tossed and lofty paradise of glowing gray, purple, or brown, on the other. The day would have been hot but for being tempered by the ice. This seasoned its shining warmth with a crisp, exhilarating quality, making the sunshine and summer mildness like iced sherry or Madeira. It is unlike anything known in more southern climates. There are days in March that would resemble it, could you take out of them the damp, the laxness of nerve, and the spring melancholy. There are days in October that come nearer; but these differ by their delicious half-languors, while, by their gorgeousness of autumn foliage, and their relation to the oldening year, they are made quite unlike in spirit. This day warmed like summer and braced like winter.

Morning—the ice, lots of it, completely filling the wide straits! A light wind had been blowing for the last couple of hours, and now the ice was clearly visible just ahead. We hadn’t expected to encounter it here. At Port Mulgrave, they told us the last of it had passed through with a rush about a week ago. Bradford was thrilled and quickly got out his camera to capture this unexpected scene because he had brought along a great setup and a skilled photographer. In an hour or two, the schooner reached it, and finding it fairly open while the wind was gentle and the sea smooth as a pond, we entered right into the middle of it. Waterfowl—puffins, murres, ducks, and similar birds—were around, providing early entertainment for those among us looking for sport or specimens. It was a fantastic day overall: the atmosphere was rare, pure, and perfect; sunlight poured down like a waterfall; on one side, land was a cloud of blue and snow, while on the other, it was a chaotic yet beautiful paradise of glowing gray, purple, or brown. The day would have been hot if it weren't for the ice cooling things down. It added a crisp, refreshing quality to the warmth, making the sunshine and summer feel like chilled sherry or Madeira. It’s unlike anything you’d experience in warmer climates. There are days in March that might be similar if you could take away the dampness, the tiredness, and the springtime gloom. Days in October come closer; however, they differ with their lovely half-drowsiness, and their vibrant autumn colors, as well as their connection to the aging year, make them feel quite different in spirit. This day felt warm like summer and invigorating like winter.

Once fairly taken into the bosom of the ice-field, we had eyes for little else. Its forms were a surprise, so varied and so beautiful. I had supposed that field-ice was made up of flat cakes,—and[Pg 42] cake of all kinds is among the flattest things I know! But here if was, simulating all shapes, even those of animated creatures, with the art of a mocking bird,—and simulating all in a material pure as amber, though more varied in color. One saw about him cliffs, basaltic columns, frozen down, arabesques, fretted traceries, sculptured urns, arches supporting broad tables or sloping roofs, lifted pinnacles, boulders, honey-combs, slanting strata of rock, gigantic birds, mastodons, maned lions, couching or rampant,—a fantasy of forms, and, between all, the shining, shining sea. In sunshine, these shapes were of a glistening white flecked with stars, where at points the white was lost in the glisten; in half shadow the color was gray, in full shadow aërial purple; while, wherever the upper portions projected over the sea, and took its reflection, they often did, the color was an infinite, emerald intensity of green; beneath all which, under water, was a base or shore of dead emerald, a green paled with chalk. Blue was not this day seen, perhaps because this was shore-ice rather than floe,—made, not like the floes, of frozen sea, but of compacted and saturated snow.

Once we were fully immersed in the ice field, we could focus on little else. Its shapes were surprising, so varied and beautiful. I had thought field ice consisted of flat slabs—after all, a[Pg 42] cake of any kind is one of the flattest things I know! But here it was, mimicking all sorts of shapes, even resembling living creatures, with the skill of a mockingbird—and all in a material as clear as amber but more colorful. One could see cliffs, basalt columns, intricate designs, sculpted urns, arches supporting wide tables or sloping roofs, soaring peaks, boulders, honeycombs, slanted rock layers, giant birds, mastodons, and lions, whether lying down or standing proud—a fantasy of forms, with the bright, shining sea between them. In sunlight, these shapes sparkled in glistening white, dotted with stars where the white blended into the shine; in partial shadow, they turned gray, and in full shadow, they took on an airy purple; where the upper parts jutted out over the sea and reflected it, the color became a deep, vibrant green; beneath it all, underwater lay a base of dead emerald, a green muted by chalk. Blue was absent this day, perhaps because this was shore ice rather than floe ice—formed not from frozen seawater like the floes but from compacted and saturated snow.

Just before evening came, when the courteous breeze folded its light fans fell asleep, we left this field behind, and, seeing all clear ahead, supposed the whole had been passed. In truth, as had soon to learn, this twenty-mile strip of shore-ice was but the advance-guard of an immeasurable field or army of floe. For there came down the northern coast, in this summer of 1864, more than a thousand miles' length, with a breadth of about a hundred miles, of floe-ice in a field almost unbroken! More than a thousand miles, by accurate computation! The courtesy of the Westerner—who, having told of seeing a flock of pigeons nine miles long, so dense as to darken the sun at noonday, and meeting objections from a skeptical Yankee, magnanimously offered, as a personal favor, to "take out a quarter of a mile from the thinnest part"—cannot be imitated here. I must still say more than a thousand miles,—and this, too, the second run of ice!

Just before evening, when the gentle breeze settled down, we left this field behind. With a clear view ahead, we thought we had passed the worst of it. In reality, as we would soon find out, this twenty-mile section of shore ice was just the front line of an endless expanse of floe. Coming down the northern coast in the summer of 1864 was over a thousand miles of floe ice, spanning nearly a hundred miles wide, in a field that was almost completely unbroken! Over a thousand miles, by accurate measurement! The generosity of a Western storyteller—who, after recounting a sighting of a flock of pigeons stretching nine miles long, dense enough to obscure the sun at midday, and facing skepticism from a doubtful Northerner, graciously offered to "take out a quarter of a mile from the thinnest part"—can’t be replicated here. I still have to say more than a thousand miles—and this was just the second run of ice!

Captain Linklater, master of the Moravian supply-ship, a man of acute observation and some science, had, as he afterwards told me at Hopedale, measured the rate of travel of the ice, and found it to be twenty-seven miles a day. Our passengers were sure they saw it going at the rate of three or four miles an hour. Captain Handy, looking with experienced eye, pronounced this estimate excessive, and said it went from one to one and a half miles an hour,—twenty-four to thirty-six miles a day. Captain Linklater, however, had not trusted the question to his judgment, but established the rate by accurate scientific observation. Now we were headed off by the ice and driven into as harbor on the 22d of June; we left Hopedale and began our return on the 4th of August; and between these two periods the ice never ceased running. The Moravian ship, which entered the harbor of Hopedale half a mile ahead of us, on the 31st of July, pushed through it, and found it eighty-five miles wide. Toward the last it was more scattered, and at times could not be seen from the coast. But it was there; and on the day before our departure from Hopedale, August 3, this cheering intelligence arrived:—"The ice is pressing in upon the islands outside, and an easterly wind would block us in!"

Captain Linklater, the captain of the Moravian supply ship, a man with keen observation skills and some scientific knowledge, later told me at Hopedale that he had measured the speed of the ice and found it to be twenty-seven miles a day. Our passengers were convinced they saw it moving at three or four miles an hour. Captain Handy, with his experienced eye, considered this estimate too high and said it was moving at about one to one and a half miles an hour—twenty-four to thirty-six miles a day. However, Captain Linklater had relied on precise scientific measurement rather than just his judgment. At that point, we were blocked by the ice and forced into a harbor on June 22; we left Hopedale and started our return on August 4, during which time the ice kept moving continuously. The Moravian ship, which reached the harbor of Hopedale half a mile ahead of us on July 31, pushed through the ice and found it to be eighty-five miles wide. Towards the end, the ice became more scattered and at times was not visible from the coast. But it was still there, and the day before we departed from Hopedale, August 3, we received this encouraging news: “The ice is pressing in on the islands outside, and an easterly wind would trap us in!”

What becomes of this ice? Had one lain in wait for it two hundred miles farther south, it is doubtful if he would have seen of it even a vestige. It cannot melt away so quickly: a day amidst it satisfies any one of so much. Whither does it go?

What happens to this ice? If someone had waited for it two hundred miles farther south, it’s unlikely they would have seen even a trace of it. It can’t melt that fast: spending a day among it is enough for anyone. Where does it go?

Put that question to a sealer or fisherman, and he will answer, "It sinks."

Put that question to a seal hunter or fisherman, and he’ll answer, "It sinks."

"But," replies that cheerful and confident gentleman, Mr. Current Impression, "ice doesn't sink; ice floats." Grave Science, too, says the same.

"But," replies that cheerful and confident gentleman, Mr. Current Impression, "ice doesn't sink; ice floats." Serious Science says the same thing, too.

I believe that Ignorance is right for once. You are becalmed in the midst of floating ice. The current bears you[Pg 43] and it together; but next morning the ice has vanished! You rub your eyes, but the fact is one not to be rubbed out; the ice was, and isn't, there! No evidence exists that it can fly, like riches; therefore I think it sinks. I have seen it, too, not indeed in the very act of sinking, but so water-logged as barely to keep its nose out. A block four cubic feet in dimension lay at a subsequent time beside the ship, and there was not a portion bigger than a child's fist above water. Watching it, again, when it has been tolerably well sweltered, you will see air-bubbles incessantly escaping. Evidently, the air which it contains is giving place to water. Now it is this air, I judge, which keeps it afloat; and when the process of displacement has sufficiently gone on, what can it do but drown, as men do under the circumstances? This reasoning may be wrong; but the fact remains. The reasoning is chiefly a guess; yet, till otherwise informed, I shall say, the ice-lungs get full of water, and it goes down.

I think Ignorance is right for once. You’re stuck in the middle of floating ice. The current moves you[Pg 43] and the ice together; but when morning comes, the ice is gone! You blink, but the truth is undeniable; the ice was there, and now it’s not! There’s no proof that it can disappear like wealth; so I believe it sinks. I’ve seen it too, not in the exact moment of sinking, but so waterlogged that it barely stays above water. At one point, a block measuring four cubic feet was next to the ship, and barely anything larger than a child’s fist was visible above the surface. Watching it again, when it has softened a bit, you’ll see bubbles constantly escaping. Clearly, the air inside it is being replaced by water. I think it’s this air that keeps it afloat; and when there’s enough displacement, what can it do but sink, like people do in similar situations? This reasoning might be incorrect; but the reality remains. The reasoning is mostly speculation; yet, until I learn otherwise, I’ll say the ice-lungs fill with water, and it goes down.

But we have wandered while the light waned, and now return. It was a gentle evening. That "day, so cool, so calm, so bright," died sweetly, as such a day should. The moon rose, not a globe, but a tall cone of silver,—silver that blushed; ice-magic again. But she recovered herself, and reigned in her true shape, queen of the slumber-courts; and the world slept, and we with it; and in our cabin the sleep-talk was quieted to ripples of murmur.

But we’ve wandered as the light faded, and now we’re back. It was a gentle evening. That "day, so cool, so calm, so bright," ended sweetly, just like it should. The moon rose, not as a globe, but as a tall cone of silver—silver that blushed; ice-magic again. But she found her form and ruled in her true shape, queen of the courts of sleep; and the world rested, and we did too; and in our cabin, the sleep-talk faded to soft murmurs.

June 22.—Rush! Rush! The water was racing past the ship's side, close to my ear, as I awoke early. On deck: the strait ahead was packed from shore to shore with ice, like a boy's brain with fancies; and before a jolly gale we were skimming into the harbor of Belles Amours. Five days here: tedious. The main matters here were a sand-beach, a girl who read and loved Wordsworth, a wood-thrush, a seal-race, a "killer's" head, and a cascade.

June 22.—Hurry! Hurry! The water was rushing past the side of the ship, close to my ear, as I woke up early. On deck: the strait ahead was filled from shore to shore with ice, like a boy's mind full of daydreams; and with a cheerful breeze, we were gliding into the harbor of Belles Amours. Five days here: boring. The main highlights were a sandy beach, a girl who read and loved Wordsworth, a wood-thrush, a seal race, a killer whale's head, and a waterfall.

Item, sand-beach, with green grass, looking like a meadow, beyond. Not intrinsically much of an affair. The beach, on close inspection, proved soft and dirty, the grass sedge, the meadow a bog. In the distance, however, and as a variety in this unswarded cliff-coast, it was sweet, I laugh now to think how sweet, to the eyes.

Item, a sandy beach with green grass that looks like a meadow beyond. Not really much to write home about. The beach, when looked at closely, turned out to be soft and dirty, the grass was more like sedge, and the meadow was a swamp. But in the distance, and as a change from this rough cliff coast, it was beautiful; I laugh now to think how beautiful it looked to the eyes.

Item, girl. There was one house in the harbor; not another within three miles. Here dwelt a family who spoke English,—not a patois, but English,—rare in Labrador as politicians in heaven. The French Canadians found in Southern Labrador speak a kind of skim-milk French, with a little sour-milk English; the Newfoundland Labradorians say "Him's good for he," and in general use a very "scaly" lingo, learned from cod-fish, one would think. Here was a mother, acceptable to Lindley Murray, who had instructed her children. One of these—S——, our best social explorer, found her out—owned and read a volume of Plato, and had sent to L'anse du Loup, twenty-four miles, to borrow a copy of Wordsworth. This was her delight. She had copied considerable portions of it with her own hand, and could repeat from memory many and many a page.

Item, girl. There was one house in the harbor; not another for three miles. Here lived a family who spoke English—not some dialect, but actual English—rare in Labrador like politicians in heaven. The French Canadians in Southern Labrador speak a sort of watered-down French, mixed with a bit of broken English; the Newfoundland Labradorians say "Him's good for he" and generally use a very rough language, learned from cod fish, one would think. Here was a mother, acceptable to Lindley Murray, who had taught her children well. One of these—S——, our best social explorer, found her out—owned and read a book by Plato and had sent to L'anse du Loup, twenty-four miles away, to borrow a copy of Wordsworth. This was her passion. She had copied large portions of it by hand and could recite many pages from memory.

"Many a gem of the clearest light" The dark, mysterious depths of the ocean hold; Many flowers are born to bloom unnoticed,
And waste its sweetness in the dry air.

But Heaven has its own economies; and perhaps floral "sweetness" is quite as little wasted upon the desert as upon Beacon Street or Fifth Avenue.

But Heaven has its own ways of doing things; and maybe floral "sweetness" is just as little wasted on the desert as it is on Beacon Street or Fifth Avenue.

Item, a bird. We were seeking trout,—only to obtain a minnow tricked in trout-marks. The boat crept slowly up a deep, solemn cove, over which, on either side, hung craggy and precipitous hills; while at its head was a slope covered with Liliputian forest, through which came down a broad brook in a series of snowy terraces. It was a superb day, bright and bracing,—just bracing enough to set the nerves without urging them, and exalt one to a sense of vigorous repose. The oars lingered, yet not lazily, on the way; there seemed time enough for anything. At length we came, calm, wealthy in leisure, silently cheerful, to a bit of[Pg 44] pleasant yellow beach between rocks. And just as our feet were touching the tawny sands,—

Item, a bird. We were looking for trout,—only to catch a minnow disguised with trout spots. The boat inched slowly up a deep, solemn cove, flanked by steep, jagged hills; at the head was a slope draped in tiny trees, through which a wide brook tumbled down in a series of white cascades. It was a gorgeous day, bright and refreshing,—just refreshing enough to wake up the senses without pushing them too hard, and lifting one into a state of lively relaxation. The oars glided, but not lazily; there was plenty of time for everything. Finally, we arrived, calm, rich in leisure, quietly happy, at a stretch of[Pg 44] lovely yellow beach between rocks. Just as our feet touched the golden sands,—

"The sweetest throat of Solitude" Opened her silver gates and gradually sang To the deep core of Silence, until it throbbed Response with all its echoes: for from outside That distant, timeless east, where His soul resides among the morning skies and dew, A wood-thrush, the angel of the treetops,
He poured his clear, pure soprano throughout the space, Enhancing the silence with a tranquil calm, That revealed all of Silence's deepest feelings. In tune.

It was a regal welcome. What is like the note of the wood-thrush?—so full of royalty and psalm and sabbath! Regal in reserve, however, no less than utterance, the sovereign songster gave a welcome only, and then was silent; while a fine piping warbler caught up the theme, and discoursed upon it with liberal eloquence. The place to hear the song of the wood-thrush is wherever you can attain to that enjoyment by walking five or ten miles; the place so to hear it that the hearing shall be, by sober estimation, among the memorable events of your life, is at the head of a solemn, sunny cove, on three yards of tawny beach, in the harbor of Belles Amours, Labrador.

It was a royal welcome. What is like the sound of the wood-thrush?—so full of majesty and melody! Regal in its restraint, as much as in its voice, the king of song gave a greeting only, then fell quiet; while a lovely little warbler picked up the tune and elaborated on it with great enthusiasm. The best place to hear the song of the wood-thrush is wherever you can reach by walking five or ten miles; but the place where hearing it will truly be one of the unforgettable moments of your life is at the head of a serene, sunny cove, on three yards of golden beach, in the harbor of Belles Amours, Labrador.

Item, seal-race. The male seals fight with fury in the season of their rude loves. Two of these had had a battle; the vanquished was fleeing, the victor after him. They were bounding from the water like dolphins. For some time I thought them such, though I have seen dolphins by thousands. It was a surprise to see these leisurely and luxurious animals spattering the water in such an ecstasy of amative rage.

Item, seal race. The male seals fight fiercely during their mating season. Two of them had a battle; the loser was fleeing, while the winner chased after him. They were leaping out of the water like dolphins. For a moment, I thought they were dolphins, even though I've seen thousands of them. It was a surprise to see these leisurely and opulent animals splashing through the water in such a frenzy of amorous aggression.

Item, "killer." This is a savage cetacean, probably the same with the "thrasher," about fifteen feet in length, blunt-nosed, strong of jaw, with cruel teeth. On its back is a fin beginning about two thirds the way from tip to tail, running close to the latter, and then sloping away to a point, like the jib of a ship. In the largest this is some five feet long on the back, and eight or ten feet in height,—so large, that, when the creature is swimming on the surface, a strong side-wind will sometimes blow it over. It is a blue-fish on a big scale, or a Semmes in the sea, hungry as famine, fierce as plague, dainty as a Roman epicure, yet omnivorous as time. The seal is its South-Down mutton, the tongue of the whale its venison; for whenever its numbers are sufficient, it will attack this huge cetacean, and torture him till he submits and gives a horrible feast to their greed. Captain Handy had seen thirty or forty of them at this business. They fly with inconceivable fury at their victim, aiming chiefly at the lip, tearing great mouthfuls away, which they instantly reject while darting for another. The bleeding and bellowing monster goes down like a boulder from a cliff, shoots up like a shell from a mortar, beats the sea about him all into crimsoned spray with his tail; but plunge, leap, foam as he may, the finny pirates flesh their teeth in him still, still are fresh in pursuit, until at length, to end one torment by submitting to another, the helpless giant opens his mouth, and permits these sea-devils to devour the quivering morsel they covet. A big morsel; for the tongue of the full-sized right-whale weighs a ton and a half, and yields a ton of oil. The killer is sometimes confounded with the grampus. The latter is considerably larger, has a longer and slenderer jaw, less round at the muzzle, smaller teeth, and "isn't so clean a made fish"; for, in nautical parlance, cetaceans are still fish. Killers frequently try to rob whalers of their prize, and sometimes actually succeed in carrying it down, despite the lances and other weapons with which their attack is so strenuously resisted.

Item, "killer." This is a fierce whale, likely the same as the "thrasher," about fifteen feet long, with a blunt nose, strong jaw, and sharp teeth. On its back is a fin that starts about two-thirds from the tip to the tail, running close to the tail and then tapering to a point, resembling a ship's jib. In the largest ones, this fin can be about five feet long on the back and eight or ten feet tall—so large that when the creature swims on the surface, a strong side wind can sometimes knock it over. It resembles a big bluefish or a Semmes in the sea, hungry as famine, fierce as a plague, picky as a Roman gourmet, yet eating anything like time itself. The seal is its South-Down mutton, the whale's tongue its venison; for whenever there are enough of them, they will attack this massive whale and torture it until it gives in, providing a horrific feast for their greed. Captain Handy had seen thirty or forty of them doing this. They charge at their victim with incredible ferocity, mainly targeting the lip, ripping away huge chunks that they instantly discard while aiming for another bite. The bleeding and roaring whale crashes down like a boulder from a cliff, shoots up like a shell from a mortar, thrashing the sea into crimson spray with its tail; but no matter how much it plunges, leaps, or foams, the finned pirates still sink their teeth into it, relentlessly pursuing until, in a final effort to end one torment by giving in to another, the helpless giant opens its mouth and allows these sea-devils to devour the quivering piece they desire. It's a big piece; the tongue of a full-sized right whale weighs a ton and a half and yields a ton of oil. The killer is sometimes mistaken for the grampus. The grampus is considerably larger, has a longer, thinner jaw, a less rounded muzzle, smaller teeth, and "isn't as cleanly made of a fish"; in nautical terms, cetaceans are still considered fish. Killers often try to steal from whalers and sometimes manage to take their catch down, even with the lances and other weapons fiercely defending against their assault.

Item, cascade. A snowy, broken stripe down a mountain-side; taken to be snow till the ear better informed the eye. Fine; but you need not go there to see.

Item, cascade. A snowy, uneven strip down a mountainside; mistaken for snow until the ear educated the eye. Fine; but you don’t have to go there to see it.

June 26.—Off to Henley Harbor, sixty-five miles, at the head of the Strait of Belle Isle. Belle Isle itself—sandstone, rich, the Professor said, in ancient fossils—lay in view. The anchor went down in deep water, close beside the notable Castle Island.[Pg 45]

June 26.—We're headed to Henley Harbor, sixty-five miles away, at the start of the Strait of Belle Isle. Belle Isle itself—made of sandstone and rich, as the Professor said, in ancient fossils—was in sight. The anchor dropped in deep water, right next to the famous Castle Island.[Pg 45]

There were some considerable floes in the harbor, the largest one aground in a passage between the two islands by which it is formed. And now came the blue of pure floe-ice! There is nothing else like it on this earth, but the sapphire gem in its perfection; and this is removed from the comparison by its inferiority in magnitude. This incomparable hue appears wherever deep shadow is interposed between the eye and any intense, shining white. The floe in question contained two caverns excavated by the sea, both of which were partially open toward the ship. And out of these shone, shone on us, the cerulean and sapphire glory! Beyond this were the deep blue waters of York Bay; farther away, grouped and pushing down, headland behind headland, into the bay, rose the purple gneiss hills, broad and rounded, and flecked with party-colored moss; while nearer glowed this immortal blue eye, like the bliss of eternity looking into time!

There were some significant ice floes in the harbor, the largest one stuck in a channel between the two islands that form it. And now came the bright blue of pure ice! There's nothing else on this planet quite like it, except maybe a perfectly cut sapphire; and that comparison falls short due to its smaller size. This unique color appears wherever deep shadows fall between the eye and any bright, shiny white. The floe in question had two caverns carved out by the sea, both of which were partially open toward the ship. And from these, the cerulean and sapphire glow shone on us! Beyond this were the deep blue waters of York Bay; further out, headland after headland rose up, pushing down into the bay, with rounded purple gneiss hills, broad and covered in colorful moss; while closer was this immortal blue eye, like the bliss of eternity gazing into time!

Next day we rowed close to this: I hardly know how we dared! Heavens! such blue! It grew, as we looked into the ice-cavern, deeper, intenser, more luminous, more awful in beauty, the farther inward, till in the depths it became not only a shrine to worship at, but a presence to bow and be silent before! It is said that angels sing and move in joy before the Eternal; but there I learned that silence is their only voice, and stillness their ecstatic motion!

Next day we paddled close to this: I can hardly believe we had the courage! Wow! That blue! It got deeper, more intense, and more radiant as we gazed into the ice cave, becoming more breathtaking the further in we went, until it turned into not just a place to admire, but a presence to revere and be quiet around! They say that angels sing and dance in joy before the Eternal; but there I realized that silence is their only expression, and stillness their joyful movement!

Meanwhile the portals of this sapphire sanctuary were of a warm rose hue, rich and delicate,—looking like the blush of mortal beauty at its nearness to the heavenly.

Meanwhile, the entrances to this sapphire sanctuary had a warm rose color, rich and delicate—resembling the blush of human beauty when it is closest to the divine.

Bradford is all right in painting the intensest blue possible,—due care, of course, being taken not to extend it uniformly over large surfaces. If he can secure any suggestion of the subtilty and luminousness,—if he can! As I come back, and utter a word, he says that the only way will be to glaze over a white ground. It had already struck me, that, as this is the method by which Nature obtains such effects, it must be the method for Art also. He is on the right track. And how the gentle soul works!

Bradford does a great job of painting the deepest blue possible—of course, he makes sure not to apply it evenly over large areas. If he can capture any hint of the subtlety and brightness—if he can! When I return and say something, he mentions that the best approach will be to glaze over a white base. It had already occurred to me that since this is how Nature achieves those effects, it must also be the way for Art. He's definitely on the right path. And what a dedicated soul he is!

But while outward Nature here assumed aspects of beauty so surpassing, man, as if to lend her the emphasis of contrast, appeared in the sorriest shape. I name him here, that I may vindicate his claim to remembrance, even when he is a blot upon the beauty around him. I will not forget him, even though I can think of him only with shame. To remember, however, is here enough. We will go back to Nature,—though she, too, can suckle "killers."

But while the outside world here looked incredibly beautiful, humans, as if to highlight the contrast, appeared in the saddest shape. I mention him here so I can acknowledge him, even when he seems like a stain on the beauty surrounding him. I won't forget him, even if I can only think of him with shame. However, remembering is enough for now. Let's return to nature—though she, too, can nurture "killers."

On the evening before our departure,—for we remained several days, and had a snow-storm meanwhile,—there was a glorious going down of the sun over the hills beyond York Bay, with a tender golden mist filling all the western heavens, and tinting air and water between. So Nature renewed her charm. And with that sun setting on Henley Harbor, we leave for the present the miserable, magnificent place.

On the evening before we left—since we stayed several days and had a snowstorm in the meantime—there was a stunning sunset over the hills beyond York Bay, with a soft golden mist covering the entire western sky and coloring the air and water in between. Nature refreshed her beauty. And with that sun setting on Henley Harbor, we momentarily say goodbye to the soulless yet grand place.

June 30.—Iceberg! An iceberg! The real thing at last! We left Henley at ten a. m., and were soon coming up with a noble berg. Its aspect, on our near approach, was that of a vast roof rising at one end, beside which, and about half its height, was the upper third of an enormous cylinder. Passing to the west, along one side of this roof, we beheld a vast cavernous depression, making a concave line in its ridge, and then dipping deep, beyond view, into the berg. The sharp upper rim of this depression came between us and the sky, with the bright shine of the forenoon sun beyond, and showed a skirt or fringe of infinitely delicate luminous green, whose contrast with the rich marble-white of the general structure was beautiful exceedingly. With the exception of this, and of a narrow blue seam, looking like lapis-lazuli, which ran diagonally from summit to base, the broad surface of this side had the look of snow-white marble lace or fretwork. Passing thence to the north face, we came apparently upon the part[Pg 46] at which the berg separated from its parent glacier. Here was a new effect, and one of great beauty. In material it resembled the finest statuary marble,—but rather the crystalline marbles of Vermont, with their brilliant half-sparkle, than the dead polish of the Parian; while the form and character of this façade suggested some fascinating, supernatural consent of chance and art, of fracture with sculpturesque and architectural design.

June 30.—Iceberg! An iceberg! The real thing at last! We left Henley at ten a.m., and soon encountered a magnificent berg. As we got closer, it looked like a huge roof rising at one end, with the upper third of a massive cylinder alongside it, about half its height. Moving to the west along one side of this roof, we spotted a large, cavernous dip that created a concave line along the ridge, plunging deep out of sight into the iceberg. The sharp upper edge of this dip was framed by the bright morning sun, casting a delicate luminous green fringe that contrasted beautifully with the rich marble-white of the iceberg. Aside from that and a narrow blue seam resembling lapis lazuli that ran diagonally from top to bottom, the broad surface appeared like a snow-white marble lace or intricate design. As we moved to the north face, we seemingly reached the point [Pg 46] where the iceberg broke away from its parent glacier. Here was a new effect, and it was stunning. In terms of material, it looked like the finest statuary marble—but more like the crystalline marbles of Vermont, with their sparkling highlights, rather than the dull polish of Parian marble. The shape and character of this façade suggested a mesmerizing blend of chance and art, combining fractures with a sculptural and architectural quality.

"He operates in circles, in magical circles of chance,"—

the subtlest thing ever said of Turner,—might have been spoken even more truly of the workman who wrought this. The apparent fineness of material cannot be overstated, so soft and powerful. "A porcelain fracture," said Ph——,—well. Yet such porcelain! It were the despair of China. On the eastern, or cylinder side, there was next the water a strip of intensely polished surface, surmounted by an elaborate level cornice, and above this the marble lace again.

the most understated comment ever made about Turner could have applied just as well to the craftsman who created this. The visible quality of the material is astonishing, both delicate and strong. "A porcelain fracture," said Ph———, and that's fair enough. But what porcelain! It would be a disappointment to China. On the eastern, or cylinder side, right next to the water, there was a strip of highly polished surface topped with an ornate level cornice, and above that, the marble lace once more.

The schooner soon tacked, and returned. As again we pass the cathedral cliff on the north, and join the western side with this in one view, we are somewhat prepared by familiarity to mingle its majesty and beauty, and take from them a single impression. The long Cyclopean wall and vast Gothic roof of the side, including many an arched, rounded, and waving line, emphasized by straight lines of blue seam, are set off against the strange shining traceries of the façade; while the union of flower-like softness and eternal strength, the fretted silver of surface, the combination of peak and cave, the fringe of blazing emerald on the ridge, the glancing, flashing lights contrasting with twilight blues and purples of deep shadow, and over all the stainless azure, and beneath and around all a sea of beryl strown with sun-dust,—these associate to engrave on the soul an impression which even death and the tomb, I would fain believe, will be powerless to efface. And if Art study hard and labor long and vehemently aspire to publish the truth of this, she does well. Her task is worthy, but is not easy: I think a greater, of the kind, has never been attempted. The height of this berg was determined by instruments—but with a conjecture only of the distance—to be one hundred and eighteen feet. Captain Brown, however, who went aloft, and thence formed a judgment, pronounced it not less than one hundred and fifty feet. One naturally inclines to the more moderate computation. But, as subsequent experience showed me that judgments of distance in such cases are almost always below the mark, I am of opinion that here, as sometimes in politics and religion, seeming moderation may be less accurate than seeming excess.

The schooner soon turned around and came back. As we once again pass the cathedral cliff on the north and combine the views of both the north and west sides, we’re somewhat ready, thanks to familiarity, to blend its majesty and beauty into a single impression. The long Cyclopean wall and the vast Gothic roof of the side, which includes many arched, rounded, and wavy lines accented by straight lines of blue seams, stand out against the strange shining patterns of the façade; while the mix of flower-like softness and eternal strength, the sparkling silver surface, the combination of peaks and caves, the fringe of blazing emerald on the ridge, and the flickering, flashing lights contrasting with twilight blues and deep purples of shadow, all beneath a spotless blue sky and surrounded by a sea of beryl sprinkled with sun-dust—these combine to create an impression that I’d like to believe will remain even after death and the grave. If Art strives hard, works long, and passionately aims to convey this truth, she’s doing well. Her task is commendable, but it’s not easy: I think a greater challenge of this kind has never been attempted. The height of this iceberg was measured by instruments—but only estimated for distance—to be one hundred and eighteen feet. However, Captain Brown, who went up top and based his judgment from there, claimed it was no less than one hundred and fifty feet. It’s natural to lean towards the more conservative estimate. But, as later experiences showed me, judgments of distance in such cases are almost always underestimated, so I believe that here, like in politics and religion at times, seeming moderation may not be as accurate as appearing excessive.

And, by the way, Noble's descriptions of icebergs, which, in the absence of personal observation, might seem excessive, are of real value. Finding a copy of his book on board, I read it with pleasure, having first fully made my own notes,—and refer to him any reader who may have appetite for more after concluding this chapter.

And, by the way, Noble's descriptions of icebergs, which might seem a bit much without having seen them yourself, are actually very valuable. I found a copy of his book on board and read it with enjoyment after making my own notes first—and I recommend it to any reader who wants more information after finishing this chapter.

Early this evening we entered between bold cliffs into Square Island Harbor, latitude about 53°. It is a deep and deeply sheltered dog's hole,—dogs and dirt could make it such,—but overhung by purple hills, which proved, on subsequent inspection, to be largely composed of an impure labradorite. Labradorite, the reader may know, is a crystallized feldspar, with traces of other minerals. In its pure state it is opalescent, exhibiting vivid gleams of blue, green, gold, and copper-color, and, more rarely, of rose,—and is then, and deservedly, reckoned a precious stone. The general character of the rock here is sienitic; but, besides this peculiar quality of feldspar, the hornblende appears as actinolite, (ray-stone,) so called from the form of its crystallization; while the quartz element is faintly present, or appears in separate masses. The purple of the hills is due not only to the labradorite, which has that as a stable color, but also to a purple lichen, which clothes much of the rock on this coast. I found also fine masses of mica imbedded in[Pg 47] quartz, edge upwards, and so compact that its lamination was not perceptible. Indeed, I did not, with my novice eyes, immediately recognize it, for it appeared a handsome copper-colored rock, projecting slightly from the quartz, as if more enduring.

Early this evening, we sailed between steep cliffs into Square Island Harbor, around latitude 53°. It’s a deep and well-protected little cove—just the kind of place that could be made messy by dogs and dirt—but it’s surrounded by purple hills. Upon closer inspection, these hills turned out to be mostly made of an impure labradorite. Labradorite, as you may know, is a crystallized feldspar with some other minerals mixed in. When it’s pure, it has an opalescent quality, showing vibrant flashes of blue, green, gold, and copper, and occasionally rose—which is why it’s considered a precious stone. The general makeup of the rock here is sienitic; in addition to that specific type of feldspar, the hornblende appears as actinolite (ray-stone), named for the shape of its crystals, while the quartz is either faintly present or found in separate chunks. The purple color of the hills comes not only from the labradorite, which has that color naturally, but also from a purple lichen that covers much of the rock along this coastline. I also discovered beautiful clusters of mica embedded in [Pg 47] quartz, standing upright and so tightly packed that I couldn’t see the layering at first. In fact, with my inexperienced eyes, I didn’t immediately recognize it, as it looked like a striking copper-colored rock, slightly protruding from the quartz, seeming more durable.

Next day there was trouting, with a little, and but a little, better than the usual minnow result.

Next day there was trout fishing, with a slight, but only a slight, improvement over the usual minnow catch.

And on the next, the floe-ice poured in and packed the harbor like a box of sardines. The scene became utterly Arctic,—rock above, and ice below. Rock, ice, and three imprisoned ships; which last, in their helpless isolation, gave less the sense of companionship than of a triple solitude. And when next day, Sunday, the third day of July, I walked ashore on the ice with a hundred feet of water beneath, summer seemed a worn-out tradition, and one felt that the frozen North had gone out over the world as to a lawful inheritance.

And the next day, the ice flowed in and filled the harbor like a can of sardines. The scene looked completely Arctic—rock above and ice below. There were rocks, ice, and three trapped ships, which, in their helpless isolation, felt more like a triple solitude than companionship. Then, the next day, Sunday, July 3rd, when I stepped onto the ice with a hundred feet of water below, summer seemed like an old tradition, and it felt like the frozen North had taken over the world as its rightful territory.

But the new Czar reigned in beauty, if also in terror. Yard-wide spaces of emerald, amethyst, sapphire, yellow-green beryl, and rose-tinted crystal, grew as familiar to the eye as paving-blocks to the dwellers in cities. The shadows of the ice were also of a violet purple, so ethereal that it required a painter's eye at once to see it, though it was unmistakably there; and to represent it will task the finest painter's hand. Then the spaces of water between the floes, if not too large, appeared uniformly in deep wine-color,—an effect for which one must have more science than I to account. It is attributed to contrast; but if thus illusive, it is at least an illusion not to be looked out of countenance. No local color could assert itself more firmly. One marvellous morning, too, a dense, but translucent, mist hovered closely, beneath strong sunshine, over the ice, lending to its innumerable fantastic forms a new, weird, witching, indescribable, real-unreal strangeness, as if the ice and the ships it inclosed and we ourselves were all but embodied dreams, half come to consciousness, and rubbing our surprised moon-eyes to gaze upon each other. The power of this mist to multiply distance was not the least part of its witchery. A schooner ten rods off looked as far away as Cadmus and Abraham.

But the new Czar ruled with beauty, as well as fear. Expanses of emerald, amethyst, sapphire, yellow-green beryl, and rose-tinted crystal became as familiar to the eye as pavement is to city dwellers. The shadows of the ice had a violet-purple hue, so delicate that only a painter's eye could truly see it, even though it was undeniably present; capturing it would challenge the finest artist. The water spaces between the ice floes, if not too large, appeared uniformly deep red, an effect that requires more understanding than I possess to explain. It's said to be due to contrast, but if that’s an illusion, it’s one that can’t be easily dismissed. No local color could be more prominent. One amazing morning, a thick but translucent mist lingered closely, under bright sunshine, over the ice, giving its countless fantastical shapes a new, strange, enchanting, indescribable, real-unreal quality, as if the ice, the ships contained within it, and ourselves were just embodied dreams becoming aware, rubbing our surprised eyes to look at each other. The mist's power to distort distance was a major part of its magic. A schooner just ten rods away looked as distant as Cadmus and Abraham.

P—— was made happy by finding here a grasshopper, which subsequently proved, however, a prize indeed,—but not quite so much of a prize as he hoped, being probably the young of a species previously known as Alpine, rather than an adult identical with one found on the summit of Mount Washington.

P—— was thrilled to find a grasshopper here, which turned out to be quite a catch—but not as much of a catch as he expected, likely being a juvenile of a species previously recognized as Alpine, rather than an adult that matched one found at the top of Mount Washington.

During the latter part of our duress here we were driven below by raw, incessant rain, and the confinement became irksome. At length, during the day and night of July 14th, the ice finally made off with itself, and the next morning the schooner followed suit. The ice, however, had not done with us. It lingered near the land, while farther out it was seen in solid mass, making witch-work, as usual, on the northern and eastern sky; and we were soon dodging through the more open portion, still dense enough, close to the coast. It was dangerous business. A pretty breeze blew; and with anything of a wind our antelope of a schooner took to her heels with speed. Lightly built,—not, like vessels designed for this coast, double-planked and perhaps iron-prowed,—she would easily have been staved by a shock upon this adamantine ice. The mate stood at the bow, shouting, "Luff! Bear away! Hard up! Hard down!" And his voice wanting strength and his articulation distinctness, I was fain, at the pinch of the game, to come to his aid, and trumpet his orders after him with my best stentorship. The old pilot had taken the helm; but his nerves were unequal to his work; and a younger man was sent to take his place. Once or twice the ship struck smaller masses of ice, but at so sharp an angle as to push them and herself mutually aside, and slide past without a crash. But a wind from the land was steadily urging the floe-field away, and at length the sea before us lay clear.[Pg 48]

During the later part of our struggle here, we were forced below by heavy, nonstop rain, and being confined became really annoying. Finally, on the day and night of July 14th, the ice finally moved away on its own, and the next morning the schooner followed suit. However, the ice hadn't completely left us yet. It lingered near the shore, while farther out it formed a solid mass, creating the usual eerie effects in the northern and eastern sky; soon we were navigating through the more open areas, which were still thick enough close to the coast. It was a risky situation. A nice breeze was blowing; and with any kind of wind, our agile schooner dashed ahead quickly. Lightly built—not like ships designed for this coast, which are double-planked and possibly iron-prowed—she could easily have been damaged by a collision with this hard ice. The mate stood at the bow, shouting, "Luff! Bear away! Hard up! Hard down!" And when his voice lacked strength and clarity, I felt compelled, in the heat of the moment, to help him out and shout his orders back at him as loudly as I could. The old pilot had taken the helm, but his nerves weren't up to the task, so a younger man was sent to replace him. A couple of times the ship bumped into smaller ice chunks, but at such sharp angles that they gently pushed each other aside and glided past without crashing. Meanwhile, a steady wind from the land kept pushing the floe-field away, and eventually the sea ahead of us lay clear.[Pg 48]

At ten a. m., we drew up to a majestic berg, and "came to,"—that is, brought the schooner close by the wind. The berg was one of the noblest. Picture to yourself two most immense Gothic churches without transepts, each with a tower in front. Place these side by side, but at a remove equal to about half their length. Build up now the space between the two towers, extending this connection back so that it shall embrace the front third or half of the churches, leaving an open green court in the rear, and you have a general conception of this piece of Northern architecture. The rear of each church, however, instead of ascending vertically, sloped at an angle of about ten degrees, and, instead of having sharp corners, was exquisitely rounded. Elsewhere also were many rounded and waving lines, where the image of a church would suggest straightness. Nevertheless, you are to cling with force to that image in shaping to your mind's eye a picture of this astonishing cathedral.

At ten a.m., we approached a massive iceberg and "came to,"—that is, we brought the schooner close to the wind. The iceberg was one of the most impressive. Imagine two huge Gothic churches without transepts, each with a tower at the front. Place them side by side, but with a gap about half their length. Now connect the two towers, extending this connection back to embrace the front third or half of the churches, leaving an open green courtyard behind, and you get a general idea of this Northern design. However, the back of each church, instead of rising straight up, sloped at about a ten-degree angle, and instead of having sharp corners, it was beautifully rounded. There were also many curved and flowing lines where you would expect the image of a church to be straight. Still, you need to hold on tightly to that image while shaping a mental picture of this incredible cathedral.

Since seeing the former berg, we had heard many tales of the danger of approaching them. The Newfoundlanders and natives have of them a mortal terror,—never going, if it can be avoided, nearer than half a mile, and then always on the leeward side. "They kill the wind," said these people, so that one in passing to windward is liable to be becalmed, and to drift down upon them,—to drift upon them, because there is always a tide setting in toward them. They chill the water, it descends, and other flows in to assume its place. These fears were not wholly groundless. Icebergs sometimes burst their hearts suddenly, with an awful explosion, going into a thousand pieces. After they begin to disintegrate, moreover, immense masses from time to time crush down from above or surge up from beneath; and on all such occasions, proximity to them is obviously not without its perils. "The Colonel," brave, and a Greenland voyager, was more nervous about them than anybody else. He declared, apparently on good authority, that the vibration imparted to the sea by a ship's motion, or even that communicated to the air by the human voice, would not unfrequently give these irritable monsters the hint required for a burst of ill-temper,—and averred also that our schooner, at the distance of three hundred yards, would be rolled over, like a child's play-boat, by the wave which an exploding or over-setting iceberg would cause. And it might, indeed, be supposed, that, did one of those prodigious creations take a notion to disport its billions of tons in a somersault, it would raise no trivial commotion.

Since seeing the former iceberg, we had heard many stories about the dangers of getting too close to them. The Newfoundlanders and locals have a genuine fear of them—never approaching closer than half a mile if they can avoid it, and always from the downwind side. "They kill the wind," these people say, meaning that if you pass too close on the upwind side, you risk getting stuck without wind and drifting towards them—drifting towards them because the tide always pulls in that direction. They cool the water, causing it to sink, and other water flows in to take its place. These fears weren’t entirely unfounded. Icebergs sometimes collapse suddenly, creating a loud explosion and breaking into a thousand pieces. Once they start to break apart, large chunks can suddenly fall from above or surge up from below; and in those moments, being close to them is clearly risky. "The Colonel," who was brave and had sailed to Greenland, was more anxious about them than anyone else. He claimed, apparently based on solid information, that the vibrations caused by a ship moving through the water or even the sound of a human voice could often trigger these unpredictable giants into a fit of anger—he also insisted that our schooner, even at three hundred yards away, would be tossed over like a child's toy by the waves created by an exploding or capsizing iceberg. And one might think that if one of those gigantic formations decided to flip its billions of tons around, it would create quite a stir.

At a distance, these considerations weighed with me. I heard them respectfully, was convinced, and silently resolved not to urge, indeed, so far as I properly might, to discourage, nearness of approach. But here all these convictions vanished away. I knew that some icebergs were treacherous, but they were others, not this! There it stood in such majesty and magnificence of marble strength, that all question of its soundness was shamed out of me,—or rather, would have been shamed, had it arisen. This was not sentiment,—it was judgment,—my judgment,—perhaps erroneous, yet a judgment formed from the facts as I saw them. Therefore I determined to launch the light skiff which Ph—— and I had bought at Sleupe Harbor, and row up to the berg, perhaps lay my hand upon it.

At a distance, these thoughts weighed on me. I listened to them respectfully, was convinced, and silently resolved not to push forward, and as much as I could, to discourage getting too close. But in that moment, all those beliefs faded away. I knew some icebergs were dangerous, but not this one! It stood there in such grandeur and strength that any doubts about its stability were pushed aside—or rather, they would have been, if they had come up. This wasn't just feeling—it was my judgment—perhaps wrong, but still my judgment based on the facts as I understood them. So, I decided to launch the small boat that Ph—— and I had bought at Sleupe Harbor and row up to the iceberg, maybe to touch it.

As the skiff went over the gunwale, the Parson cried,—

As the small boat tipped over the edge, the Parson shouted,—

"Shall I go with you?"

"Should I go with you?"

"Yes, indeed, if you wish."

"Sure, if that's what you want."

He seated himself in the stern; I assumed the oars, (I row cross-handed, with long oars, and among amateur oarsmen am a little vain of my skill) and pulled away. It was a longer pull than I had thought,—suggesting that our judgment of distances had been insufficient, and that the previous berg was higher than our measurement had made it.

He sat down at the back of the boat; I took the oars, (I row cross-handed with long oars, and I’m a bit proud of my skill among amateur rowers) and started rowing. It turned out to be a longer pull than I expected, suggesting that our sense of distance was off and that the earlier iceberg was bigger than we had estimated.

Our approach was to rear of the berg,—that is, to the court or little bay before mentioned. The temptation to enter was great, but I dared not; for the long,[Pg 49] deep ocean-swell over which the skiff skimmed like a duck, not only without danger, but without the smallest perturbation, broke in and out here with such force that I knew the boat would instantly be swept out of my possession. The Parson, however, always reckless of peril in his enthusiasm, and less experienced, cried,—

Our plan was to head to the back of the iceberg—that is, to the little bay or court I mentioned earlier. The temptation to go in was strong, but I couldn't bring myself to do it; the long, deep ocean swells that the small boat glided over like a duck, not only without danger but with the slightest disturbance, crashed in and out here with such power that I knew the boat would be swept away from me in an instant. The Parson, however, always careless about risk in his enthusiasm and less experienced, exclaimed,—

"In! in! Push the boat in!"

"In! In! Push the boat in!"

"No, the swell is too heavy; it will not do."

"No, the waves are too strong; it won't work."

"Fie upon the swell! Never mind what will do! In!"

"Forget the fuss! Who cares what will happen? Let's go in!"

I sympathized too much with him to answer otherwise than by laying my weight upon the oars, and pushing silently past. The water in this bit of bay was some six or eight feet deep, and the ice beneath it—for the berg was all solid below—showed in perfection that crystalline tawny green which belongs to it under such circumstances. I pulled around the curving rear of the eastern church, with its surface of marble lace, such as we had seen before, gazing upward and upward at the towering awfulness and magnificence of edifice, myself frozen in admiration. The Parson, under high excitement, rained his hortative oratory upon me.

I felt too much sympathy for him to respond any other way than to focus on the oars and quietly paddle away. The water in this section of the bay was about six or eight feet deep, and the ice below it—since the iceberg was completely solid underneath—had that beautiful crystalline tawny green typical of such conditions. I navigated around the curved back of the eastern church, adorned with its intricate marble design, which we had seen before, looking up and up at the towering grandeur and awe-inspiring structure, completely mesmerized. The Parson, filled with excitement, unleashed his impassioned speech on me.

"Nearer! Nearer! Let's touch it! Let's lay our hands upon it! Don't be faint-hearted now. It's now or never!"

"Closer! Closer! Let's touch it! Let's get our hands on it! Don't lose your nerve now. It's now or never!"

I heard him as one under the influence of chloroform hears his attendants. He exhorted a stone. His words only seemed to beat and flutter faintly against me, like storm-driven birds against a cliff at night. My brain was only in my eyeballs; and the arms that worked mechanically at the oars belonged rather to the boat than to me.

I heard him like someone under chloroform hears the people around them. He urged a stone. His words felt like they were softly beating and flapping against me, like storm-tossed birds battering a cliff at night. My mind was only in my eyes; the arms that were moving the oars seemed more like the boat’s than mine.

Saturated at last, if not satiated, with seeing, I glanced at the water-level, and said,—

Saturated at last, if not fully satisfied, with seeing, I glanced at the water level and said,—

"But see how the surge is heaving against it!"

"But look at how the waves are crashing against it!"

But now it was I that spoke to stone, though not to a silent one.

But now I was the one talking to the stone, even though it wasn't silent.

"Hang the surge! I'm here for an iceberg, not to be balked by a bit of surf! It's not enough to see; I must have my hand on it! I wish to touch the veritable North Pole!"

"Forget the waves! I'm here for an iceberg, not to be held back by some surf! It's not enough to just look; I need to feel it! I want to touch the real North Pole!"

It was pleasant to see the ever-genial Parson so peremptory; and I lingered half wilfully, not unwilling to mingle the relieving flavor of this pleasure with the more awful delight of other impressions: said, however, at length,—

It was nice to see the always-friendly Parson being so firm; and I stayed a bit longer on purpose, not opposed to mixing the comforting taste of this pleasure with the more intense excitement of other feelings: I finally said,—

"I intend to go up to it, when I have found a suitable place."

"I plan to go up to it once I find a good spot."

"Place! What better place do you desire than this?"

"Place! What better place could you want than this?"

I could but smile and pull on.

I could only smile and keep going.

Caution was not unnecessary. The sea rose and fell a number of feet beside the berg, beating heavily against it with boom and hiss; and I knew well, that, if our boat struck fairly, especially if it struck sidewise, it would be whirled over and over in two seconds. Besides, where we then were, there was a cut of a foot or more into the berg at the water-level,—or rather, it was excavated below, with this projection above; and had the skiff caught under that, we would drown. I had come there not to drown, nor to run any risk, but to get some more intimate acquaintance with an iceberg. Rowing along, therefore, despite the Parson's moving hortatives, I at length found a spot where this projection did not appear. Turning now the skiff head on, I drove it swiftly toward the berg; then, when its headway was sufficient, shipped the oars quickly, slipped into the bow, and, reaching forth my hand and striking the berg, sent the boat in the same instant back with all my force, not suffering it to touch.

Caution was definitely needed. The sea rose and fell several feet next to the iceberg, crashing heavily against it with a roar and spray; I knew that if our boat hit it the wrong way, especially sideways, it would flip over in seconds. Also, where we were, there was a dip of a foot or more into the iceberg at the waterline—it was carved out below, with this overhanging part above; if the skiff got caught under that, we would drown. I had gone there not to drown or take any risks, but to get to know an iceberg better. So, despite the Parson's urging, I kept rowing until I found a spot where this overhang didn’t seem to be a problem. Turning the skiff straight on, I moved it quickly toward the iceberg; then, when we had enough speed, I put the oars down quickly, slipped to the front, and reached out my hand to hit the iceberg, sending the boat back with all my strength, making sure it didn’t touch.

"Now me! Now me!" shouted the Parson, brow hot, and eyes blazing. "You're going to give me a chance, too? I would not miss it for a kingdom!"

"Now it’s my turn! Now it’s my turn!" shouted the Parson, his forehead sweaty and his eyes on fire. "Are you going to give me a shot, too? I wouldn’t miss it for the world!"

"Yes; wait, wait."

"Yeah; hold on, hold on."

I took the oars, got sea-room, then turned its stern, where the Parson sat, toward the iceberg, and backed gently in.

I grabbed the oars, moved out to open water, then turned the back of the boat, where the Parson was sitting, toward the iceberg, and carefully backed in.

"Put your hand behind you; reach out as far as you can; sit in the middle; keep cool, cool; don't turn your body."[Pg 50]

"Put your hand behind you; reach out as far as you can; sit in the middle; stay calm, calm; don't twist your body." [Pg 50]

"Cool, oh, yes! I'm cool as November," he said, with a face misty as a hot July morning with evaporating dew. As his hand struck the ice, I bent the oars, and we shot safely away.

"Cool, oh, yes! I'm as cool as November," he said, with a face as cloudy as a hot July morning with evaporating dew. As his hand hit the ice, I bent the oars, and we shot away safely.

"Hurrah! hurrah!" he shouted, making the little boat rock and tremble,—"hurrah! This, now, is the 'adventurous travel' we were promised. Now I am content, if we get no more."

"Hooray! Hooray!" he shouted, causing the little boat to rock and shake, — "Hooray! This is the 'exciting journey' we were promised. I'm happy now, even if we don’t get anything more."

"Cool; you'll have us over."

"Great; we'll come over."

"Pooh! Who's cooler?"

"Pooh! Who's cooler?"

We went leisurely around this glacial cathedral. The current set with force about it, running against us on the eastern side. At the front we found the "cornice" again, about twenty feet up, sloping to the water, and dipping beneath it on either side; below it, a crystal surface; above, marble fretwork. This cornice indicates a former sea-level, showing that the berg has risen or changed position. This must have taken place, probably, by the detachment of masses; so an occurrence of this kind was not wholly out of question, after all. There is always, however,—so I suspect,—some preliminary warning, some audible crack or visible vibration. I had kept in mind the possibility of such changes, and at the slightest intimation should have darted away,—a movement favored by the lightness of the skiff, and the extreme ease with which, under the advantage of a beautiful model, she was rowed.

We strolled casually around this glacial cathedral. The current pushed forcefully against us on the eastern side. In the front, we spotted the "cornice" again, about twenty feet up, sloping towards the water and dipping beneath it on either side; below it was a crystal-clear surface; above, marble patterns. This cornice shows a previous sea level, indicating that the iceberg has risen or shifted position. This likely happened due to the detachment of large chunks, so an event like this wasn’t entirely out of the question. However, I suspect there’s always some sort of preliminary warning—like an audible crack or visible vibration. I had kept in mind the chance of such changes, and at the slightest hint, I would have quickly moved away—a reaction made easy by the lightness of the skiff and how effortlessly it was rowed, thanks to its beautiful design.

A sense of awe, almost of fear, crept over me now that the adventure was over, and I looked up to the mighty towers of the façade with a somewhat humbled eye; and so, pulling slowly and respectfully along the western side, made away, solemn and satisfied, to the ship.

A feeling of awe, almost fear, came over me now that the adventure was over, and I looked up at the towering façade with a sense of humility; and so, moving slowly and respectfully along the western side, I made my way, solemn and satisfied, to the ship.

I expected a storm of criticism on our return, but found calm. The boat was hoisted in silently, and I hurried below, to lie down and enjoy the very peculiar entertainment which vigorous rowing was sure to afford me.

I anticipated a wave of criticism upon our return, but instead, I found peace. The boat was pulled in quietly, and I rushed below to lie down and enjoy the rather unusual entertainment that vigorous rowing was bound to provide me.

Released after a half-hour's toasting on the gridiron, I went on deck and found the Parson surrounded by a cloud of censure. The words "boyish foolhardiness," catching my ear, flushed me with some anger,—to which emotion I am not, perhaps, of all men least liable. So I stumped a little stiffly to the group, and said,—

Released after being grilled for half an hour, I went up on deck and found the Parson surrounded by a bunch of criticism. The phrase "boyish recklessness" caught my attention, and it made me feel a bit angry—which, I admit, I can be prone to. So, I walked over to the group a bit stiffly and said,—

"I don't feel myself altogether a boy, and foolhardiness is not my forte."

"I don't really feel like a boy, and being reckless isn't my strong suit."

"Well, success is wisdom," said the Colonel, placably. "You have succeeded, and now have criticism at a disadvantage, I own."

"Well, success is knowledge," said the Colonel calmly. "You've succeeded, and now criticism is at a disadvantage, I admit."

Another, however,—not a braver man on board,—stood to his guns.

Another man, though not braver than anyone else on board, stood by his guns.

"Experienced men say that it is dangerous; I hear to them till I have experience myself."

"Experienced people say it's risky; I listen to them until I have my own experience."

"Right, if so it stands in your mind. You judge thus: you follow your judgment. I judge partly so, and partly otherwise, and I follow my judgment. Mere experience is but a purblind wisdom, after all. When I do not at all see my own way, I follow that, still aware of its imperfections; where eyes are of service, I use them, learning from experience caution, not submission. The real danger in this case was that of being dashed against the berg; with coolness and some skill" (was there a little emphasis on this word skill?) "that danger could be disarmed. For any other danger I was ready, but did not fear it. 'Boyish?' The boyish thing, I take it, is always to be a pendant upon other people's alarms. I prefer rather to be kite than its tail only."

"Right, if that's how it is in your mind. You judge that way: you follow your judgment. I judge partly like that, and partly differently, and I follow my judgment. Plain experience is just a limited type of wisdom, after all. When I can’t clearly see my own way, I still follow it, fully aware of its flaws; where my eyes can help, I use them, learning from experience to be cautious, not submissive. The real danger here was being slammed against the iceberg; with coolness and some skill (was there a bit of emphasis on that word skill?), that danger could be avoided. For any other threat, I was prepared, but didn’t worry about it. 'Boyish?' I suppose the boyish thing is always to ride on other people's fears. I’d rather be the kite than just its tail."

"Well, each of us does follow his own judgment," replied Candor; "you act as you think; I think you are wrong. If it were shooting a Polar bear now,—there's pleasure in that, and it were worth the while to run some risk."

"Well, each of us does follow our own judgment," replied Candor; "you act based on your beliefs; I think you're mistaken. If it were about hunting a polar bear now—there's excitement in that, and it would be worth taking some risks."

We had tried for a bear together. I seized my advantage.

We had gone searching for a bear together. I took my chance.

"It is a pleasure to you to shoot a bear. So to me also. But I would rather get into intimacy with an iceberg than freight the ship with bears."

"It’s a thrill for you to hunt a bear. It is for me too. But I’d prefer to get up close with an iceberg than load the ship with bears."

He smiled an end to the colloquy. As I went below, Captain Handy, the Arctic whaler, met me with,—

He smiled to wrap up the conversation. As I went below, Captain Handy, the Arctic whaler, met me with,—

"I would as lief as not spend a week on that berg! I have made fast to such, and lain for days. All depends[Pg 51] on the character of the berg. If it's rotting, look out! If it's sound as that one, you may go to sleep on it."

"I would just as soon not spend a week on that iceberg! I've been stuck on ones like it before and laid there for days. It all depends[Pg 51] on the condition of the iceberg. If it's falling apart, watch out! If it's as solid as that one, you could sleep on it."

I hastened up to proclaim my new ally. "You heed experience; hear Captain Handy." And I launched his bolt at the head of Censure, and saw it duck, if no more.

I rushed over to introduce my new ally. "You listen to experience; meet Captain Handy." Then I aimed his shot at the head of Censure and watched it dodge, if nothing else.

We saw after this, going and returning, many bergs, hundreds in all. With one of the finest, a little more broken and varied than those previously described, we came up at a little past noon, and the schooner stood off and on while Bradford went in the boat to sketch it in color,—Captain Handy's steady and skilful hand upon the sculling-oar. Bradford worked at it like a beaver all the afternoon, and then directed the schooner to lie to through the night, that he might resume his task in the morning,—coveting especially the effects of early light The ardent man was off before three o'clock. Nature was kind to him; he sketched the berg under a dawn of amber and scarlet, followed by floods on floods of morning gold; and returned to breakfast, after five hours' work, half in rapture and half in despair. The colors, above all, the purples, were inconceivable, he said, and there was no use trying to render them. I reminded him of Ruskin's brave words:—"He that is not appalled by his tasks will do nothing great." But his was an April despair, after all, with rifted clouds and spring sunshine pouring through.

We noticed many icebergs, hundreds in total, as we went back and forth. We came across one of the most impressive ones, a bit more broken and varied than the others we had seen, a little after noon. The schooner circled while Bradford took a small boat to sketch it in color, with Captain Handy expertly steering. Bradford worked hard all afternoon, and then asked the schooner to stay put for the night so he could continue his work in the morning, especially wanting to capture the early light. The passionate guy was up before three o'clock. Nature was generous; he sketched the iceberg under a dawn of amber and red, followed by waves of morning gold, and returned for breakfast after five hours of work, feeling both ecstatic and frustrated. He said the colors, especially the purples, were beyond belief and there was no way to accurately capture them. I reminded him of Ruskin's bold words: “He that is not appalled by his tasks will do nothing great.” But his despair was like an April morning, with scattered clouds and spring sunshine breaking through.

Another memorable one was seen outside while we were in harbor, storm-bound. A vast arch went through the very heart of it, while each end rose to a pinnacle,—the arch blue, blue! We were going out to it; but, during the second night of storm, its strength broke, and beneath blinding snow there remained only a mad dance of waves over the wreck of its majesty.

Another unforgettable sight was outside while we were stuck in the harbor due to the storm. A huge arch ran through the very center of it, with each end rising to a peak—the arch was so blue! We were planning to head out to it; however, during the second night of the storm, its strength shattered, and beneath the blinding snow, there was only a chaotic dance of waves over the remnants of its grandeur.

There was another, curiously striped with diagonal dirt-bands, whose fellowship, however, the greens and purples did not disdain.

There was another one, strangely marked with diagonal dirt stripes, but its companions, the greens and purples, did not look down on it.

Another had the shape of three immense towers, seeming to stand on the water, more than a hundred feet of sea rolling between. The tallest tower could not be much less than two hundred feet in height; the others slightly, just perceptibly, lower. This was seen in rain, and the purples here were more crystalline and shining than any others which I observed.

Another had the shape of three gigantic towers, appearing to stand on the water, with over a hundred feet of sea rolling between them. The tallest tower was probably around two hundred feet high; the others were just slightly lower, barely noticeable. This was seen in the rain, and the purples here were more vibrant and shining than any others I noticed.

These towers were seen on our last day among the bergs. In my memory they are monumental. They stand there, a purple trinity, to commemorate the terrors and glories that I shall behold no more.

These towers were visible on our last day among the icebergs. In my mind, they are monumental. They stand there, a purple trio, to remember the fears and triumphs that I will never see again.


KALLUNDBORG CHURCH.

"Be quiet, my child!
Tomorrow Fin is coming,
Father dear,
"Let Esbern Snare's eyes and heart play with you!"
New Zealand Rhyme.
"Build at Kallundborg by the sea
A church as impressive as a church can be,
"And there you will marry my beautiful daughter,"
Said the Lord of Nesvek to Esbern Snare.[Pg 52]
The Baron laughed. But Esbern said,
"Even if I lose my soul, I will marry Helva!" And he walked away confidently, filled with determination, To the Troll who lived in Ulshoi Hill.
"Build, O Troll, a church for me
At Kallundborg near the vast ocean;
Build it grand, and build it well,
"Build it quickly," Esbern Snare said.
But the cunning Dwarf said, "No work is done
By Trolls of the Hills, O man, for nothing. What will you give for your beautiful church? "Set your own price," said Esbern Snare.
"When Kallundborg church is built well,
You must tell the name of its builder,
"Either your heart and your eyes have to be my blessing." "Build," Esbern said, "and do it quickly."
Day and night, the Troll worked on; He cut the wood and stacked the stones; But day by day, as the walls grew strong,
Esbern Snare became darker and more sorrowful.
He listened at night, he watched during the day,
He searched and contemplated, but he didn't dare to pray; He called out to the shy Elle-maids in vain, The Neck and the Nis didn't respond.
News of his wicked deal spread everywhere. A rumor spread throughout the countryside;
And Helva of Nesvek, young and beautiful,
I prayed for the soul of Esbern Snare.
And now the church was almost finished; It was missing one pillar, and only one; And the grim Troll muttered, "You are a fool!
"Tomorrow gives me your eyes and heart!"
By Kallundborg in deep despair,
Through the woods and fields, Esbern Snare walked,
Until, tired and exhausted, the strong man fell. Under the birches on Ulshoi bank.
On his last day of work, he heard the Troll
Hammer and dig in the quarry's pit;
Before him, the church stood tall and beautiful:
"I have built my tomb," said Esbern Snare.
And he closed his eyes to hide the sight,
When he heard a soft step next to him:
"O Esbern Snare!" a lovely voice said, "I wish I could die in your place right now!"[Pg 53]
With a hold strengthened by love and fear,
He held her tightly, and he held her for a long time; With the pounding heart of a frightened bird,
She buried her face in his bright red beard.
"O love!" he exclaimed, "let me see today
In your eyes before mine are taken away;
Let me hold you close, let me feel your heart
Before me, the Troll is being torn apart!
"I messed up, O Helva, because I loved you!"
"Please pray that Lord Christ forgives me!"
But as quickly as she prayed, and even faster, Defeated the Troll on Ulshoi Hill.
He knew, as he worked, that a loving heart Was somehow puzzling his wicked skill;
For more than a spell of Elf or Troll
It's a young woman's prayer for her lover's soul.
And Esbern listened and heard the sound. A Troll wife singing underground: "Tomorrow comes fine, father thine:
Lie still and be quiet, my baby!
"Stay still, my love! next sunrise
"You'll toy with Esbern Snare's heart and eyes!" "Ha! Ha!" said Esbern, "is that what you're up to? "Thanks to the Troll-wife, I know his name!"
The Troll heard him and quickly moved on. To Kallundborg Church with the missing stone.
"Too late, Gaffer Fine!" shouted Esbern Snare; And Troll and pillar disappeared into thin air!
That night, the harvesters heard the sound Of a woman crying underground,
And the Hill-Troll's voice was loud with accusations. About the careless singer who revealed his name.
They sing the rune of the Church Troll. By the Northern Sea during the harvest moon;
And the fishermen of Zealand still hear him Yelling at his wife on Ulshoi Hill.
And looking out over its birch groves towards the sea The tower of Kallundborg church still stands,
Where, first at its altar, a married couple, Helva of Nesvek and Esbern Snare stood!

GEORGE CRUIKSHANK IN MEXICO.

And first, let it be on record that his name is George Cruikshank, and not Cruickshank. The good old man is seventy years of age, if not more, (the earliest drawing I have seen of his bears the date of 1799, and he could scarcely have begun to limn in his long-clothes,) yet, with a persistence of perversity wellnigh astonishing,—although his name has been before the public for considerably more than half a century,—although he has published nothing anonymously, but has appended his familiar signature in full to the minutest scratchings of his etching-needle,—although he has been the conductor of two magazines, and of late years has been one of the foremost agitators and platform-orators in the English temperance movement,—the vast majority of his countrymen have always spelt his surname "Cruickshank," and will continue so to spell it, I suppose, even should he live as long as Cornaro. I hope he may, I am sure, with or without the additional c for his age and his country can ill spare him.

And first, let it be noted that his name is George Cruikshank, not Cruickshank. The good old man is seventy years old, if not more (the earliest drawing I've seen of his is dated 1799, and he could hardly have started working in his long clothes at that time). Yet, with an astonishing level of stubbornness—despite his name being in the public eye for well over half a century—despite never having published anything anonymously and signing his name in full on even the tiniest details of his etchings—despite having been the editor of two magazines and, in recent years, being one of the leading activists and speakers in the English temperance movement—the vast majority of his fellow countrymen have always spelled his last name "Cruickshank," and I suppose they will continue to do so, even if he lives as long as Cornaro. I hope he does; I’m sure that, with or without the extra c, his age and his country can hardly afford to lose him.

But George Cruikshank in Mexico! What on earth can the most stay-at-home of British artists have to do with that out-of-the-way old curiosity-shop of the American continent? One might fancy him now—but that it is growing late—in the United States. He might be invited to attend a Total Abstinence Convention. He might run Mr. J.B. Gough hard on his favorite stump. He might be tempted, perchance, to cross the ocean in the evening of his days, to note down, with his inimitable and still unfaltering pencil, some of the humors of Yankee-land. I am certain, that, were George Cruikshank or Dicky Doyle to come this way and give a pictorial history of a tour through the States, somewhat after the immortal Brown, Jones, and Robinson pattern, the Americans would be in a better temper with their brothers in Old England than after reading some long spun-out book of travels by brainless Cockneys or cynical dyspeptics. The laugh awakened by a droll picture hurts nobody. It is that ugly letter-press which smarts and rankles, and festers at last into a gangrene of hatred. The Patriarch of Uz wished that his enemy had written a book. He could have added ten thousand fold to the venom of the aspiration, had he likewise expressed a wish that the book had been printed.

But George Cruikshank in Mexico! What could the most homebody of British artists possibly have to do with that remote old curiosity shop of the American continent? One might imagine him now—but it’s getting late—in the United States. He could be invited to a Total Abstinence Convention. He might challenge Mr. J.B. Gough on his favorite soapbox. He could even be tempted, perhaps, to cross the ocean in the twilight of his life, to sketch, with his unique and still steady pencil, some of the quirks of Yankee-land. I’m sure that if George Cruikshank or Dicky Doyle were to come this way and create a visual history of a trip through the States, somewhat like the legendary Brown, Jones, and Robinson, Americans would be in a better mood with their counterparts in Old England than after reading some lengthy travelogue by clueless Cockneys or cynical sourpusses. A funny picture never hurts anyone. It’s the harsh words that sting and linger, eventually festering into a wound of hatred. The Patriarch of Uz wished his enemy had written a book. He could have added a thousand times more venom to that wish had he also expressed a desire for the book to be printed.

You will be pleased to understand, then, that the name of the gentleman who serves as text for this essay is Cruikshank, and not Cruickshank. There is an old Scottish family, I believe, of that ilk, which spells its name with a c before the k. Perhaps the admirers of our George wished to give something like an aristocratic smack to his patronymic, and so interpolated the objectionable consonant. There is no Cruikshank to be found in the "Court Guide," but Cruickshanks abound. As for our artist, he is a burgess among burgesses,—a man of the people par excellence, and an Englishman above all. His travels have been of the most limited nature. Once, in the course of his long life, and with what intent you shall presently hear, he went to France, as Hogarth did; but France didn't please him, and he came home again, like Hogarth, with all convenient speed,—fortunately, without being clapped up in jail for sketching the gates of Calais. I believe that he has not crossed the Straits of Dover since George IV. was king. I have heard, on good authority, that he protested strongly, while in foreign parts, against the manner in which the French ate new-laid eggs, and against the custom, then common among the peasantry, of wearing wooden shoes. I am afraid even, that, were George hard pressed, he would own to a dim persuasion that all Frenchmen wear wooden shoes; also pigtails; likewise cocked hats. He does not say so in society; but those who have his private[Pg 55] ear assert that his faith or his delusion goes even farther than this, and that he believes that all Frenchmen eat frogs,—that nine tenths of the population earn their living as dancing-masters, and that the late Napoleon Buonaparte (George Cruikshank always spells the Corsican Ogre's name with a u) was first cousin to Apollyon, and was not, upon occasion, averse to the consumption of human flesh,—-babies of British extraction preferred. Can you show me an oak that ever took so strong a root as prejudice?

You'll be happy to know that the name of the gentleman discussed in this essay is Cruikshank, not Cruickshank. There's an old Scottish family with that name, spelled with a c before the k. Perhaps the fans of our George wanted to add an aristocratic flair to his surname, so they inserted that bothersome consonant. You won't find Cruikshank in the "Court Guide," but Cruickshanks are everywhere. As for our artist, he's a true man of the people—and an Englishman above all. His travels have been quite limited. Once, during his long life, he went to France, like Hogarth did, but he didn’t like it there and returned home quickly, fortunately avoiding jail for sketching the gates of Calais. I believe he hasn't crossed the English Channel since George IV was king. I've heard that while abroad, he strongly criticized how the French ate fresh eggs and the common practice among peasants of wearing wooden shoes. I’m even afraid that if pressed, George would admit to a vague notion that all Frenchmen wear wooden shoes, have pigtails, and cocked hats. He doesn’t say this in public, but those who have his private[Pg 55] ear claim that his beliefs, or perhaps delusions, go even further—that he thinks all Frenchmen eat frogs, that most of the population makes a living as dancing instructors, and that the late Napoleon Buonaparte (George Cruikshank always spells the Corsican Ogre’s name with a u) was related to Apollyon and had a taste for human flesh—preferably British babies. Can you show me an oak that has ever taken root as deeply as prejudice?

Not that George Cruikshank belongs in any way to the species known as "Fossil Tories." He is rather a fossil Liberal. He was a Whig Radical, and more, when the slightest suspicion of Radicalism exposed an Englishman to contumely, to obloquy, to poverty, to fines, to stripes, to gyves, and to the jail. He was quite as advanced a politician as William Cobbett, and a great deal honester as a man. He was the fast friend of William Hone, who, for his famous "Political Catechism,"—a lampoon on the borough-mongers and their bloated king,—was tried three times on three successive days, before the cruel Ellenborough, but as many times acquitted. George Cruikshank inveighed ardently, earnestly, and at last successfully, with pencil and with etching-point, against the atrocious blood-thirstiness of the penal laws,—the laws that strung up from six to a dozen unfortunates on a gallows in front of Newgate every Monday morning, often for no direr offence than passing a counterfeit one-pound note. When the good old Tories wore top-boots and buckskins, George Cruikshank was conspicuous for a white hat and Hessians,—the distinguishing outward signs of ultra-liberalism. He was, of course, a Parliamentary Reformer in the year '30; and he has been a social reformer, and a most useful one, ever since. Still is there something about this brave old English worthy that approaches the fossil type. His droll dislike to the French—a hearty, good-humored disfavor, differing widely from the polished malevolence of Mr. John Leech, who never missed an opportunity to represent the airy Gaul as something repulsive, degraded, and ungentlemanly—I have already noticed. Then George Cruikshank has never been able to surmount a vague notion that steamboats and steam-engines are, generically speaking, a humbug, and that the old English sailing craft and the old English stage-coach are, after all, the only modes of conveyance worthy the patronage of Britons. Against exaggerated hoop-skirts he has all along set his face, and seldom, if ever, condescends to delineate a lady in crinoline. His beau-ideal of female beauty is comprised in an hour-glass waist, a skirt that fits close to the form, a sandalled shoe, and very long ringlets; whereas tight lacing, narrow skirts, sandalled shoes, and ringlets have been banished from the English modes any time these fifteen years. Those among George's critics, too, who are sticklers for exactitude in the "abstract and brief chronicle of the time" complain that his dandies always wear straps to their tight pantaloons in lieu of pegtops; that their vests are too short and their coat-collars too high; that they wear bell-crowned hats, and carry gold-knobbed canes with long tassels; and that they are dressed, in short, after the fashion of the year one, when Brummell or Pea-Green Haynes commanded the ton. It is obvious that the works of an artist who has refused to be indoctrinated with the perpetual changes of a capricious code of dress would never be very popular with the readers of "Punch,"—a periodical which, pictorially, owes its very existence to the readiness and skill displayed by its draughtsmen in shooting folly as it flies and catching the manners living as they rise, and pillorying the madness of the moment. Were George Cruikshank called upon, for instance, to depict a lady fording a puddle on a rainy day, and were he averse (for he is the modestest of artists) to displaying too much of her ankle, he would assuredly make manifest, beneath her upraised skirts, some antediluvian pantalet, bordered by a pre-Adamite[Pg 56] frill. But the keen-eyed Mr. Leech would be guilty of no such anachronism. He would discover that the mysterious garments in question were ofttimes encircled by open-worked embroidery. He would find out that the ladies sometimes wore Knickerbockers. And this is what the ladies like. Exaggerate their follies as much as you please; but woe be to you, if you wrongfully accuse them! You may sneer at, you may censure, you may castigate them for what they really do, but beware of reprehending them for that which they have never done. Even Sir John Falstaff revolted at the imputation of having kissed the keeper's daughter. A sermon against crinoline, be it ever so fulminating, finds ever an attentive and smiling congregation; but venture to preach against coal-scuttle bonnets—until the ladies have really taken to wearing them—and your hearers would pull down the pulpit and hang the preacher.

Not that George Cruikshank is in any way a "Fossil Tory." He's more like a fossil Liberal. He was a Whig Radical and more, back when just being suspected of Radicalism could lead an Englishman to ridicule, scorn, poverty, fines, punishment, shackles, and jail. He was as progressive a politician as William Cobbett, and much more honest as a person. He was a close friend of William Hone, who was tried three times over three consecutive days by the harsh Ellenborough for his famous "Political Catechism," a satire on the borough-mongers and their bloated king, but was acquitted each time. George Cruikshank passionately and successfully argued against the brutal bloodthirstiness of the penal laws—the laws that hung six to a dozen unfortunate souls from a gallows in front of Newgate every Monday morning, often for nothing worse than passing a fake one-pound note. When the good old Tories wore top-boots and buckskins, George Cruikshank was noticeable for a white hat and Hessians—the telltale signs of extreme liberalism. He was, of course, a Parliamentary Reformer in 1830 and has been a social reformer—and a very effective one—ever since. Still, there’s something about this brave old Englishman that feels fossil-like. His quirky dislike of the French—an amiable, good-natured disapproval, very different from the polished malice of Mr. John Leech, who always seized the chance to depict the airy Gaul as something repugnant, degraded, and unrefined—has already been noted. Moreover, George Cruikshank has never quite shaken off his vague belief that steamboats and steam engines are, broadly speaking, a scam, and that the old English sailing ships and stagecoaches are, after all, the only modes of transport worthy of British support. He has consistently opposed exaggerated hoop skirts and seldom, if ever, depicts a woman in crinoline. His ideal of female beauty includes an hourglass figure, a skirt that fits snugly, a sandal-style shoe, and very long curls; while tight lacing, narrow skirts, sandals, and ringlets have been out of fashion in England for at least the last fifteen years. Critics of George, who insist on accuracy in the "abstract and brief chronicle of the time," complain that his dandies always wear straps on their tight pants instead of pegtops; that their vests are too short and their coat collars too high; that they wear bell-crowned hats and carry gold-knobbed canes with long tassels; and that they are dressed in the style of yesteryear when Brummell or Pea-Green Haynes were in vogue. It’s clear that the works of an artist who refuses to be schooled in the constant shifts of a fickle fashion code would not be very popular with the readers of "Punch," a magazine that owes its existence to its illustrators' ability to capture folly as it occurs and highlight the prevailing behaviors, holding up the absurdities of the moment for examination. If George Cruikshank were tasked with depicting a lady stepping over a puddle on a rainy day, and if he were reluctant (as he is the most modest of artists) to show too much of her ankle, he would certainly reveal some old-fashioned garment beneath her lifted skirts, bordered by a prehistoric frill. But the keen-eyed Mr. Leech would not make such a mistake. He would notice that the mysterious garments were often adorned with open-work embroidery. *He would find out that the ladies sometimes wore Knickerbockers.* And this is what women enjoy. Exaggerate their foibles as much as you want; but be warned, if you accuse them of something they’ve never done! You can mock, scold, or chastise them for what they actually do, but be cautious about wrongly blaming them for something they’ve never done. Even Sir John Falstaff was horrified at the suggestion that he had kissed the keeper's daughter. A scathing sermon against crinoline always finds an attentive and smiling audience; but dare to preach against coal-scuttle bonnets—until the ladies have actually started wearing them—and your listeners would tear down the pulpit and hang the preacher.

Thus, although foreigners may express wonder that a designer, who for so many years has been in the front rank of English humorous artists, should never have contributed to the pages of our leading humorous periodical, astonishment may be abated, when the real state of the case, as I have endeavored to put it, is known. George Cruikshank is at once too good for, and not quite up to the mark of "Punch." His best works have always been his etchings on steel and copper; and wonderful examples of chalcographic brilliance and skill those etchings are,—many of them surpassing Callot, and not a few of them (notably the illustrations to Ainsworth's "Tower of London") rivalling Rembrandt. From the nature of these engravings, it would be impossible to print them at a machine-press for a weekly issue of fifty or sixty thousand copies. George has drawn much on wood, and his wondrous wood-cuts—xylographs, if you wish a more pretentious word—to "Three Courses and a Dessert," "The Odd Volume," "The Gentleman in Black," Grimm's "Fairy Tales," "Philosophy in Sport," and "The Table-Book," will be long remembered, and are now highly prized by amateurs; but his minute and delicate pencil-drawings have taxed the energies of the very best engravers of whom England can boast,—of Vizetelly, of Landells, of Jackson, of Thompson, and of Thurston. George Cruikshank would never suffer his drawings on wood to be slashed and chopped about by hasty or incompetent gravers; and although the ateliers of "Punch" are supplied with a first-rate staff of wood-cutters, very great haste and very little care must often be apparent in the weekly pabulum of cuts; nor should such an appearance excite surprise, when the exigencies of a weekly publication are remembered. The "Punch" artists, indeed, draw with a special reference to that which they know their engravers can or cannot do. Mr. Tenniel's cartoons are put on wood precisely as they are meant to be cut, in broad, firm, sweeping lines, and the wood-engraver has only to scoop out the white interstices between the network of lines; whereas Mr. Leech dashed in a bold pen-and-ink-like sketch and trusted to the xylographer, who knew his style well and of old, to produce an engraving, tant bien que mal, but as bold and as dashing as the original. The secession, for reasons theological, from "Punch" of Mr. Richard Doyle, an event which took place some fifteen years since, (how quickly time passes, to be sure!) was very bitterly regretted by his literary and artistic comrades; and the young man who calmly gave up something like a thousand pounds a year for conscience' sake lost nothing, but gained rather in the respect and admiration of society. But the wood-engravers must have held high carousal over the defection of Mr. Doyle. To cut one of his drawings was a crucial experiment. His hand was not sure in its touch; he always drew six lines instead of one; and in the portrait of a lady from his pencil, the agonized engraver had to hunt through a Cretan labyrinth of faces before he found the particular countenance which Mr. Doyle wished to be engraved.

Thus, while foreigners might be surprised that a designer who has been a leading figure in English humor for so many years has never contributed to our top humorous magazine, their astonishment may lessen when they understand the actual situation I've tried to explain. George Cruikshank is both too talented for and not quite fitting for "Punch." His best works have always been his etchings on steel and copper, which are remarkable examples of engraving brilliance and skill—many of them surpassing Callot, and several (notably the illustrations for Ainsworth's "Tower of London") rivaling Rembrandt. Due to the nature of these engravings, it would be impossible to print them on a machine for a weekly run of fifty or sixty thousand copies. George has drawn extensively on wood, and his amazing woodcuts—xylographs, if you prefer a fancier term—for "Three Courses and a Dessert," "The Odd Volume," "The Gentleman in Black," Grimm's "Fairy Tales," "Philosophy in Sport," and "The Table-Book," will be long remembered and are now highly valued by collectors. However, his intricate and delicate drawings have challenged even the best engravers England has to offer—Vizetelly, Landells, Jackson, Thompson, and Thurston. George Cruikshank would never allow his wood drawings to be carelessly rushed by hasty or incompetent engravers; and even though "Punch" has a top-notch team of woodcutters, great haste and little care often show in the weekly cuttings, which shouldn’t be surprising considering the demands of a weekly publication. The artists at "Punch" draw with a clear awareness of what their engravers can or cannot accomplish. Mr. Tenniel's cartoons are designed precisely as they are meant to be engraved, with bold, firm lines, allowing the wood engraver to simply carve out the spaces between the lines. In contrast, Mr. Leech would create a strong pen-and-ink-like sketch and rely on the engraver, who knew his style well, to produce an engraving that was just as bold and dynamic as the original. Mr. Richard Doyle's departure from "Punch" for theological reasons, about fifteen years ago, was sincerely lamented by his literary and artistic peers; the young man, who calmly chose to give up around a thousand pounds a year for conscience, gained rather than lost respect and admiration in society. However, the wood engravers must have celebrated Mr. Doyle's exit. Engraving one of his drawings was a significant challenge. His hand wasn’t steady; he always drew six lines instead of one, and in the portrait of a lady he sketched, the struggling engraver had to search through a complex maze of faces to find the specific likeness Mr. Doyle wanted to be engraved.

I have strayed away, perhaps unpardonably,[Pg 57] from George Cruikshank. To those whose only ludicrous prophet is "Punch" he may be comparatively little known. But in the great world of pictorial art, both in England and on the Continent, he worthily holds an illustrious place. His name is a household word with his countrymen; and whenever a young hopeful displays ever so crude an aptitude for caricaturing his schoolmaster, or giving with slate and pencil the facetious side of his grandmother's cap and spectacles, he is voted by the unanimous suffrage of fireside critics to be a "regular Cruikshank." In this connection I have heard him sometimes called "Crookshanks," which is taking, I apprehend, even a grosser liberty with his name than in the case of the additional c,—"Crookshanks" having seemingly a reference, and not a complimentary one, to George's legs.

I have strayed away, perhaps unpardonably,[Pg 57] from George Cruikshank. To those who only know "Punch" as their comedic source, he might not be very well-known. But in the vast world of visual art, both in England and abroad, he holds an important position. His name is well-known among his fellow countrymen; and whenever a young person shows even the slightest ability to caricature their teacher or humorously portrays their grandmother's cap and glasses on a slate with a pencil, they are unanimously declared by family critics to be a "regular Cruikshank." In this context, I've sometimes heard him referred to as "Crookshanks," which I believe is an even bigger distortion of his name than just adding an extra c,—"Crookshanks" seemingly alluding, not in a flattering way, to George's legs.

This admirable artist and good man was the son of old Isaac Cruikshank, in his day a famous engraver of lottery-tickets, securities in which the British public are now no longer by law permitted to invest, but which, fifty years since, made as constant a demand on the engraver's art as, in our time and in America, is made by the thousand and one joint-stock banks whose pictorial promises-to-pay fill, or should properly fill, our pocket-books. The abilities of Isaac were not entirely devoted to the lottery; and I have at home, from his hand, a very rare and curious etching of the execution of Louis XVI., with an explanatory diagram beneath of the working of the guillotine. George Cruikshank's earliest pencil-drawings are dated, as I have remarked, before the present century drew breath; but he must have begun to gain reputation as a caricaturist upon copper towards the end of the career of Napoleon I.,—the "Boney" to whom he has adhered with such constant, albeit jocular, animosity. He was the natural successor of James Gillray, the renowned delineator of "Farmer George and Little Nap," and "Pitt and Boney at Dinner," and hundreds of political cartoons, eagerly bought in their day, but now to be found only in old print-shops. Gillray was a man of vast, but misapplied talents. Although he etched caricatures for a livelihood, his drawing was splendid,—wellnigh Michel-Angelesque,—but always careless and outré. He was continually betting crown-bowls of punch that he would design, etch, and bite in so many plates within a given time, and, with the assistance of a private bowl, he almost always won his bets; but the punch was too much for him in the long run. He went mad and died miserably. George Cruikshank was never his pupil; nor did he ever attain the freedom and mastery of outline which the crazy old reprobate, who made the fortune of Mr. Humphries, the St. James's Street print-seller, undeniably possessed; but his handling was grounded upon Gillray's style; and from early and attentive study of his works he must have acquired that boldness of treatment, that rotundity of light and shade, and that general "fatness," or morbidezza, of touch, which make the works of Gillray and Cruikshank stand out from the coarse scrawls of Rowlandson, and the bald and meagre scratches of Sir Charles Bunbury. Unless I am much mistaken, one of the first works that brought George into notice was an etching published in 1815, having reference to the exile of the detested Corsican to St. Helena. But it was in 1821 that he first made a decided mark. For William Hone—a man who was in perpetual opposition to the powers that were—he drew on wood a remarkable series of illustrations to the scurrilous, but perhaps not undeserved, satires against King George IV., called, "The Political House that Jack Built," "The Green Bag," "A Slap at Slop," and the like,—all of them having direct and most caustic reference to the scandalous prosecution instituted against a woman of whom it is difficult to say whether she was bad or mad or both, but who was assuredly most miserable,—the unhappy Caroline of Brunswick. George Cruikshank's sketch of the outraged husband, the finest and stoutest gentleman in Europe, being lowered by[Pg 58] means of a crane into a pair of white kid pantaloons suspended between the posts of his bed, was inimitably droll, and clearly disloyal. But disloyalty was fashionable in the year '21.

This talented artist and good man was the son of old Isaac Cruikshank, who was a well-known engraver of lottery tickets in his time. Nowadays, the British public isn’t allowed to invest in those anymore, but back then, fifty years ago, they were in high demand among engravers, similar to how countless joint-stock banks fill, or should fill, our wallets today in America with their pictorial promises to pay. Isaac's skills weren’t solely focused on the lottery; I have a rare and intriguing etching at home of Louis XVI's execution, complete with a diagram showing how the guillotine worked. George Cruikshank's earliest drawings are dated before the start of this century, but he likely began to gain recognition as a caricaturist working in copper toward the end of Napoleon I's reign. He consistently mocked "Boney" with a humorous yet fierce spirit. He was a natural successor to James Gillray, the famous artist behind "Farmer George and Little Nap," "Pitt and Boney at Dinner," and many other political cartoons that were eagerly bought in their time but are now only found in antique shops. Gillray had immense, though poorly directed, talents. Although he created caricatures for a living, his drawings were exceptional—almost Michelangelo-level—but often careless and bizarre. He would regularly bet that he could design, etch, and complete a certain number of plates in a specific time frame, and with the help of a private drink, he usually won his bets, but alcohol ultimately brought him down. He went mad and died in misery. George Cruikshank was never his student, nor did he achieve the same freedom and mastery of line that the eccentric Gillray, known for making Mr. Humphries, the St. James's Street print-seller, a fortune, undeniably had. However, George's work was shaped by Gillray's style, and through early and careful study of his pieces, he developed the confidence in technique, depth of light and shadow, and that overall richness, or softness, of touch that distinguish both Gillray’s and Cruikshank’s works from Rowlandson’s rough sketches and Sir Charles Bunbury’s sparse lines. If I’m not mistaken, one of the first works that brought George into the spotlight was an etching published in 1815 that referred to the exile of the despised Corsican to St. Helena. But it was in 1821 that he truly made a name for himself. For William Hone—a man constantly challenging the authorities—he drew a remarkable series of woodcut illustrations for the scathing yet possibly deserved satires against King George IV titled "The Political House that Jack Built," "The Green Bag," "A Slap at Slop," and others, all with direct and biting references to the scandalous prosecution of a woman who was hard to classify as either bad, mad, or both, but who was definitely very unfortunate—the miserable Caroline of Brunswick. George Cruikshank's depiction of the outraged husband, the finest and stoutest gentleman in Europe, being lowered by means of a crane into a pair of white kid pants hanging between the posts of his bed, was incredibly funny and clearly disloyal. But disloyalty was the trend in '21.

For twenty years afterwards the history of the artist's career is but the history of his works, of his innumerable illustrations to books, and the sketchbooks, comic panoramas, and humorous cartoons he published on his own account. Besides, I am not writing a life of George Cruikshank, and all this time I have been keeping him on the threshold of the city of Mexico. Let it suffice to say, briefly, that in 1841 came a stand-point in his life, through the establishment of a monthly magazine entitled "George Cruikshank's Omnibus." Of this he was the sole illustrator. The literary editor was Laman Blanchard; and in the "Omnibus," William Makepeace Thackeray, then a gaunt young man, not much over thirty, and quite unknown to fame,—although he had published "Yellowplush" in "Fraser,"—wrote his quaint and touching ballad of "The King of Brentford's Testament." The "Omnibus" did not run long, nor was its running very prosperous. George Cruikshank seemed for a while wearied with the calling of a caricaturist; and the large etchings on steel, with which between '40 and '45 he illustrated Ainsworth's gory romances, indicated a power of grouping, a knowledge of composition, a familiarity with mediæval costume, and a command over chiaroscuro, which astonished and delighted those who had been accustomed to regard him only as a funny fellow,—one of infinite whim, to be sure, but still a jester of jests, and nothing more. Unfortunately, or fortunately, as the case might be,—for the rumor ran that George intended to abandon caricaturing altogether, and to set up in earnest as an historical painter,—there came from beyond the sea, to assist in illustrating "Windsor Castle," a Frenchman named Tony Johannot. Who but he, in fact, was the famous master of the grotesque who illustrated "Don Quixote" and the "Diable Boiteux" of Le Sage? To his dismay, George Cruikshank found a competitor as eccentric as himself, as skilful a manipulator rem acu, the etching-point, and who drew incomparably better than he, George Cruikshank, did. He gave up the mediæval in disgust; but he must have hugged himself with the thought that he had already illustrated Charles Dickens's "Oliver Twist," and that the Frenchman, powerful as he was, could never hope to come near him in that terrific etching of "Fagin in the Condemned Cell."

For the next twenty years, the story of the artist’s career is really just the story of his works, including countless illustrations for books, as well as the sketchbooks, comic panoramas, and humorous cartoons he published himself. Plus, I’m not writing a biography of George Cruikshank, and for all this time, I’ve had him on the edge of the city of Mexico. To sum it up quickly, in 1841, a turning point in his life came with the launch of a monthly magazine called "George Cruikshank's Omnibus." He was the only illustrator for it. The literary editor was Laman Blanchard, and in the "Omnibus," William Makepeace Thackeray, who was then a skinny young man just over thirty and not yet known to fame—despite having published "Yellowplush" in "Fraser"—contributed his quirky and poignant ballad, "The King of Brentford's Testament." The "Omnibus" didn’t last long, nor was it particularly successful. For a time, George Cruikshank seemed tired of being a caricaturist; and the large steel etchings he created between '40 and '45 for Ainsworth’s gory romances showed a talent for grouping, an understanding of composition, familiarity with medieval clothing, and a mastery of chiaroscuro that amazed and pleased those who had only ever seen him as a comedian—undoubtedly creative, but still just a jester at heart. Unfortunately, or perhaps fortunately, since there were rumors that George planned to completely move away from caricature and pursue a serious career as a historical painter, a Frenchman named Tony Johannot arrived from overseas to help illustrate "Windsor Castle." Who else but the renowned master of the grotesque, famous for illustrating "Don Quixote" and Le Sage's "Diable Boiteux"? To his surprise, George Cruikshank found a competitor who was just as quirky as he was, equally skilled with the etching-point rem acu, and who drew far better than he did. Disheartened, he abandoned medieval themes, but he must have taken comfort in the fact that he had already illustrated Charles Dickens’s "Oliver Twist," and knew that despite the Frenchman’s talent, he could never match him in that striking etching of "Fagin in the Condemned Cell."

Again nearly twenty years have passed, and George Cruikshank still waves his Ithuriel's spear of well-ground steel, and still dabbles in aquafortis. An old, old man, he is still strong and hale. If you ask him a reason for his thus rivalling Fontenelle in his patriarchal greenness, for his being able at threescore and ten to paint pictures, (witness that colossal oil-painting of the "Triumph of Bacchus,") to make speeches, and to march at the head of his company as a captain of volunteers, he will give you at once the why and because. He is the most zealous, the most conscientious, and the most invulnerable of total abstainers. There were days when he took tobacco: witness that portrait of himself, smoking a very long meerschaum pipe in "Love's Triumph," etched about 1845. There were times when he heard the chimes at midnight, and partook of that "richt gude willie waucht" which tipsy Scotchmen, when they have formed in a ring, standing upon chairs, each with one foot on the table, hiccoughingly declare that we are bound to take for the sake of "auld lang syne." But George Cruikshank has done with willie wauchts as with bird's-eye and Killikinick. For many years he has neither drunk nor smoked. He is more than a confessor, he is an apostle of temperance. His strange, wild, grand performances, "The Bottle" and "The Drunkard's Children,"—the first quite Hogarthian in its force and pungency,—fell like thunderbolts among the gin-shops. I am afraid that George Cruikshank would not be a very welcome[Pg 59] guest at Felix Booth's distillery, or at Barclay and Perkins's brewery. For, it must be granted, the sage is a little intolerant. "No peace with the Fiery Moloch!" "Écrasons l'infâme!" These are his mottoes. He would deprive the poor man of the scantiest drop of beer. You begin with a sip of "the right stuff," he teaches us in "The Bottle," and you end by swigging a gallon of vitriol, jumping on your wife, and dying in Bedlam of delirium tremens. I have not heard his opinions concerning cider, or root-beer, or effervescing sarsaparilla, or ginger-pop; but I imagine that each and every one of those reputed harmless beverages would enter into his Index Expurgatorius. "Water, water, everywhere, and not a drop [of alcohol] to drink." 'Tis thus he would quote Coleridge. He is as furious against tobacco as ever was King James in his "Counterblast." He is of the mind of the old divine, that "he who plays with the Devil's rattles will soon learn to draw his sword." In his pious rage against intemperance, and with a view to the instruction of the rising generation, he has even published teetotal versions of "Cinderella" and "Jack the Giant-Killer,"—a proceeding which Charles Dickens indignantly reprobated in an article in "Household Words," called "Frauds upon the Fairies." Nearly the last time I met George Cruikshank in London was at a dinner given in honor of Washington's birthday. He had just been gazetted captain of his rifle company, and was good enough to ask me if I knew any genteel young men, of strictly temperance principles, who would like commissions in his corps. I replied, that, so far as principles were concerned, I could recommend him five hundred postulants; but that, as regarded practice, most of the young men of my acquaintance, who had manifested an ambition for a military career, drank hard.

Again, nearly twenty years have gone by, and George Cruikshank still wields his Ithuriel's spear made of well-ground steel and still plays around with aquafortis. An old, old man, he remains strong and healthy. If you ask him why he rivals Fontenelle with his enduring vitality, able at seventy to create paintings (like that massive oil painting of the "Triumph of Bacchus"), give speeches, and lead his team as a volunteer captain, he’ll explain it all right away. He is the most passionate, the most dedicated, and the most steadfast of total abstainers. There were days when he smoked tobacco: just look at that portrait of him, puffing a very long meerschaum pipe in "Love's Triumph," etched around 1845. There were times when he joined in midnight celebrations and enjoyed that "richt gude willie waucht" which tipsy Scotsmen declare, standing in a circle on chairs, each with a foot on the table, and drunkenly suggest we should partake in for "auld lang syne." But George Cruikshank has moved on from willie wauchts, just like from bird's-eye and Killikinick. For many years now, he hasn't drunk or smoked. He is more than just a confessor; he is an apostle of temperance. His striking, wild, grand works, "The Bottle" and "The Drunkard's Children,"—the first one powerful and impactful like Hogarth—dropped like thunder among the gin shops. I suspect George Cruikshank wouldn’t be a very welcome guest at Felix Booth's distillery or at Barclay and Perkins's brewery. After all, it must be said, the wise man is a bit intolerant. "No peace with the Fiery Moloch!" "Écrasons l'infâme!" These are his mottos. He would take away the smallest drop of beer from the poor man. He teaches us in "The Bottle" that you start with a sip of "the right stuff," and you end up downing a gallon of poison, attacking your wife, and dying in a mental hospital from delirium tremens. I haven’t heard his thoughts on cider, root beer, effervescing sarsaparilla, or ginger ale; but I can imagine that each of these so-called harmless drinks would make it onto his Index Expurgatorius. "Water, water, everywhere, and not a drop [of alcohol] to drink." This is how he would quote Coleridge. He is as vehement against tobacco as King James was in his "Counterblast." He believes, like the old divine, that "he who plays with the Devil's rattles will soon learn to draw his sword." In his passionate rage against intemperance, and to educate the younger generation, he has even published abstinent versions of "Cinderella" and "Jack the Giant-Killer,"—an action that Charles Dickens furiously criticized in an article in "Household Words" titled "Frauds upon the Fairies." The last time I encountered George Cruikshank in London was at a dinner celebrating Washington's birthday. He had just been appointed captain of his rifle company and was kind enough to ask me if I knew any respectable young men with strict temperance values who would be interested in joining his unit. I replied that, as far as principles went, I could recommend five hundred candidates; but in terms of actual practice, most of the young men I knew who aspired to a military career drank heavily.

The which, oddly enough, leads me at last to Mexico.—We had had, on the whole, rather a hard morning of it. The Don, who was my host in the siempre leal y insigne ciudad de Méjico,—and a most munificent and hospitable Don he was,—took me out one day in the month of March last to visit a hacienda or farm which he possessed, called, if I remember aright, La Escalera. I repeat, we had a hard morning of it. We rose at six,—and in mountainous Mexico the ground at early morn, even during summer, is often covered with a frosty rime. I looked out of the window, and when I saw the leaves of the trees glistening with something which was not dew, and Popocatepetl and Iztaccihuatl mantled with eternal snows in the distance, I shivered. A cup of chocolate, a tortilla or thin griddle-cake of Indian meal, and a paper cigar, just to break your fast, and then to horse. To horse! Do you know what it is, being a poor horseman, to bestride a full-blood, full-bred white Arab, worth ever so many hundred pesos de oro, and, with his flowing mane and tail, and small, womanly, vixenish head, beautiful to look upon, but which in temper, like many other beauteous creatures I have known, is an incarnate fiend? The Arab they gave me had been the property of a French general. I vehemently suspect that he had been dismissed from the Imperial army for biting a chef d'escadron through one of his jackboots, or kicking in three of the ribs of a maréchal des logis. That was hard enough, to begin with. Then the streets of Mexico are execrably paved, and the roads leading out of the city are full of what in Ireland are termed "curiosities," to wit, holes; and my Arab had a habit, whenever he met an equine brother, and especially an equine sister, on the way, of screaming like a possessed Pythoness, and then of essaying to stand on his hind legs. However, with a Mexican saddle,—out of which you can scarcely fall, even though you had a mind to it,—and Mexican stirrups, and a pair of spurs nearly as big as Catharine-wheels, the Arab and I managed to reach the Church of Our Lady of Guadalupe, five miles out, and thence, over tolerably good roads, another five miles, to the Escalera. I wish they would make Mexican saddles of something[Pg 60] else besides wood very thinly covered with leather. How devoutly did I long for the well-stuffed pig-skin of Hyde Park! We had an hour or two more hard work riding about the fields, when we reached the farm, watching the process of extracting pulque from the maguey or cactus,—and a very nasty process it is,—inspecting the granaries belonging to the hacienda, and dodging between the rows of Indian corn, which grows here to so prodigious a height as to rival the famous grain which is said to grow somewhere down South, and to attain such an altitude that a Comanche perched upon the head of a giraffe is invisible between the rows. About noon we had breakfast, and that was the hardest work of all. Item, we had mutton-chops, beefsteaks, veal cutlets, omelets, rice, hominy, fried tomatoes, and an infinity of Mexican hashes and stews seasoned with chiles or red-pepper pods. Item, we had a huge pavo, a turkey,—a wild turkey; and then, for the first time, did I understand that the bird we Englishmen consume only at Christmas, and then declare to be tough and flavorless, is to be eaten to perfection only in the central regions of the American continent. The flesh of this pavo was like softened ivory, and his fat like unto clotted cream. There were some pretty little tiny kickshaws in the way of pine-apples, musk-melons, bananas, papaws, and custard-apples, and many other tropical fruits whose names I have forgotten. I think, too, that we had some stewed iguana or lizard; but I remember, that, after inflicting exemplary punishment on a bowl of sour cream, we wound up by an attack on an albacor, a young kid roasted whole, or rather baked in a lump of clay with wood-ashes heaped over him, and brought to table on a tea-tray! Shade of Gargantua, how we ate! I blessed that fiery Arab for giving me such an appetite. There was a good deal of smoking going on at odd times during breakfast; but nobody ventured beyond a cigarro of paper and fine-cut before we attacked the albacor. When coffee was served, each man lighted a puro, one of the biggest of Cabaña's Regalias; and serious and solemn puffing then set in. It was a memorable breakfast. The Administrador, or steward of the estate, had evidently done his best to entertain his patron the Don with becoming magnificence, nor were potables as dainty as the edibles wanting to furnish forth the feast. There was pulque for those who chose to drink it. I never could stomach that fermented milk of human unkindness, which combines the odor of a dairy that has been turned into a grogshop with the flavor of rotten eggs. There was wine of Burgundy and wine of Bordeaux; there was Champagne: these three from the Don's cellar in Mexico, and the last cooled, not with vulgar ice, but with snow from the summit of Popocatepetl,—snow that had been there from the days of Montezuma and Guatimozin; while as chasse and pousse to the exquisitely flavored Mexican coffee, grown, ground, and roasted on the hacienda, we had some very ripe old French Cognac, (1804, I think, was the brand,) and some Peruvian pisco, a strong white cordial, somewhat resembling kirsch-wasser, and exceeding toothsome. We talked and laughed till we grew sleepy, (the edibles and potables had of course nothing to do with our somnolence,) and then, the farm-house of the hacienda having seemingly as many rooms as the Vatican, each man hied him to a cool chamber, where he found a trundle-bed, or a hammock, or a sofa, and gravely laid himself out for an hour's siesta. Then the Administrador woke us all up, and gleefully presented us with an enormous bowl of sangaree, made of the remains of the Bordeaux and the brandy and the pisco, and plenty of ice,—ice this time,—and sugar, and limes, and slices of pineapple, Madam,—the which he had concocted during our slumber. We drained this,—one gets so thirsty after breakfast in Mexico,—and then to horse again for a twelve miles' ride back to the city. I omitted to mention two or three little circumstances which gave a zest and piquancy to the entertainment.[Pg 61] When we arrived at the hacienda, although servitors were in plenty, each cavalier unsaddled and fed his own steed; and when we addressed ourselves to our siesta, every one who didn't find a double-barrelled gun at the head of his bed took care to place a loaded revolver under his pillow. For accidents will happen in the best-regulated families; and in Mexico you can never tell at what precise moment Cacus may be upon you.

The which, oddly enough, leads me at last to Mexico.—We had had, overall, quite a tough morning. The Don, who was my host in the siempre leal y insigne ciudad de Méjico,—and a very generous and welcoming Don he was,—took me out one day in March to visit a hacienda or farm he owned, which, if I remember correctly, was called La Escalera. I repeat, we had a tough morning. We got up at six,—and in mountainous Mexico, the ground in the early morning, even in summer, is often covered in frost. I looked out the window, and when I saw the leaves of the trees shining with something that was not dew, and Popocatepetl and Iztaccihuatl capped with eternal snow in the distance, I shivered. A cup of chocolate, a tortilla or thin corn cake, and a paper cigar, just to have something for breakfast, and then we were off on horseback. On horseback! Do you know how it feels, as a poor horse rider, to ride a full-bred white Arab, worth a hefty number of pesos de oro, and with his flowing mane and tail, and small, delicate, mischievous head, beautiful to look at, but whose temper, like many other beautiful creatures I have known, is downright fiendish? The Arab they gave me used to belong to a French general. I strongly suspect that he was let go from the Imperial army for biting a chef d'escadron through one of his jackboots, or kicking three ribs out of a maréchal des logis. That was tough enough to start with. Then the streets of Mexico are poorly paved, and the roads leading out of the city are full of what in Ireland are called "curiosities," meaning holes; and my Arab had this habit, whenever he saw another horse, especially a mare, of screaming like a possessed sorceress, and then trying to rear up on his hind legs. But with a Mexican saddle,—which you can barely fall out of, even if you tried,—and Mexican stirrups, and spurs almost as big as Catherine wheels, the Arab and I managed to reach the Church of Our Lady of Guadalupe, five miles out, and then another five miles, over relatively good roads, to La Escalera. I wish they would make Mexican saddles out of something[Pg 60] other than wood thinly covered with leather. Oh, how I longed for the well-stuffed pigskin of Hyde Park! We had another hour or two of hard riding through the fields, when we finally reached the farm, watching the really nasty process of extracting pulque from the maguey or cactus,—inspecting the granaries belonging to the hacienda, and dodging between rows of corn, which grows so tall here it rivals the famous grain said to grow in the South, reaching heights where a Comanche on the head of a giraffe is invisible between the rows. Around noon we had breakfast, and that was the hardest work of all. Item, we had mutton chops, beefsteaks, veal cutlets, omelets, rice, hominy, fried tomatoes, and a variety of Mexican hashes and stews seasoned with chiles or red-pepper pods. Item, we had a huge pavo, a wild turkey; and then, for the first time, I understood that the bird we Brits only eat at Christmas and then say is tough and tasteless, is truly delicious only in the central regions of the American continent. The meat of this pavo was like softened ivory, and its fat was like clotted cream. There were also some pretty little delicacies in the form of pineapples, musk melons, bananas, papaws, custard apples, and many other tropical fruits whose names I’ve forgotten. I think we also had some stewed iguana or lizard; but I remember, after punishing a bowl of sour cream, we ended with an albacor, a young kid roasted whole, or rather baked in a lump of clay with wood ashes piled on top of him, and served on a tea tray! Shade of Gargantua, how we ate! I was grateful to that fiery Arab for giving me such an appetite. There was quite a bit of smoking happening at various times during breakfast; but no one touched anything more than a paper cigar and fine-cut before we went for the albacor. When coffee was served, each man lit a puro, one of Cabaña's biggest Regalias; and serious, solemn puffing began. It was a memorable breakfast. The Administrador, or steward of the estate, clearly pulled out all the stops to entertain his patron the Don in style, and there were as many fine drinks as there were delicious foods to accompany the feast. There was pulque for those who wanted it. I could never stomach that fermented drink, which combines the smell of a dairy turned into a bar with the taste of rotten eggs. There was Burgundy wine, Bordeaux wine, and Champagne: the first three from the Don's cellar in Mexico, and the last cooled not with ordinary ice, but with snow from the summit of Popocatepetl,—snow that had been there since the time of Montezuma and Guatimozin; while as chasse and pousse to the exquisitely flavored Mexican coffee, which was grown, ground, and roasted on the hacienda, we had some very mature old French Cognac, (I think it was from 1804,) and some Peruvian pisco, a strong white liquor, reminiscent of kirsch-wasser, and absolutely tasty. We talked and laughed until we grew sleepy, (the food and drinks, of course, had nothing to do with our drowsiness,) and then, the farmhouse of the hacienda seeming to have as many rooms as the Vatican, each man made his way to a cool room, where he found a trundle bed, or a hammock, or a sofa, and seriously laid himself down for an hour's siesta. Then the Administrador woke us all up and happily presented us with a huge bowl of sangaree, made from the leftovers of the Bordeaux, brandy, and pisco, mixed with plenty of ice,—actual ice this time,—sugar, limes, and slices of pineapple, Madam,—which he concocted while we were asleep. We downed this,—you get so thirsty after breakfast in Mexico,—and then it was back on horseback for a twelve-mile ride back to the city. I forgot to mention a couple of little details that added some spice to the outing.[Pg 61] When we arrived at the hacienda, despite there being plenty of staff, each rider unsaddled and fed his own horse; and when we settled in for our siesta, anyone who didn’t find a double-barreled gun at the head of his bed made sure to hide a loaded revolver under his pillow. Because accidents can happen in the best-regulated families; and in Mexico, you never know when Cacus might come upon you.

Riding back to the siempre leal y insigne ciudad at about three o'clock in the afternoon, when the sun was at its hottest, was no joke. Baking is not precisely the word, nor boiling, nay, nor frying; something which is a compound of all these might express the sensation I, for one, felt. Fortunately, the Don had insisted on my assuming the orthodox Mexican riding-costume: cool linen drawers, cut Turkish fashion; over these, and with just sufficient buttons in their respective holes to swear by, the leathern chapareros or overalls; morocco slippers, to which were strapped the Catharine-wheel spurs; no vest; no neckerchief; a round jacket, with quarter doubloons for buttons; and a low-crowned felt hat, with an enormous brim, a brim which might have made a Quaker envious, and have stricken mortification to the soul of a Chinese mandarin. This brim kept the sun out of your eyes; and then, by way of hatband, there was a narrow, but thick turban or "pudding," which prevented the rays of Sol from piercing through your skull, and boiling your brains into batter. The fact of the whole of this costume, and the accoutrements of your horse to boot, being embroidered with silver and embellished with golden bosses, thus affording a thousand tangents for Phœbus to fly off from, rather detracted from the coolness of your array; but one must not expect perfection here below. In a stove-pipe hat, a shooting-coat, and riding-cords, I should have suffered much more from the heat. As it was, I confess, that, when I reached home, in the Calle San Francisco, Mexico, I was exceedingly thankful. I am not used to riding twenty-four miles in one day. I think I had a warm bath in the interval between doffing the chapareros and donning the pantaloons of every-day life. I think I went to sleep on a sofa for about an hour, and, waking up, called for a cocktail as a restorative. Yes, Madam, there are cocktails in Mexico, and our Don's body-servant made them most scientifically. I think also that I declined, with thanks, the Don's customary invitation to a drive before dinner in the Paseo. Nor barouche, nor mail-phaëton, nay, nor soft-cushioned brougham delighted me. I felt very lazy and thoroughly knocked up.

Riding back to the siempre leal y insigne ciudad around three o'clock in the afternoon, when the sun was at its hottest, was no joke. "Baking" isn't quite the right word, nor "boiling," or "frying"; something that combines all of these might better describe how I felt. Luckily, the Don had insisted I wear the traditional Mexican riding outfit: cool linen trousers, cut in a Turkish style; on top of those, just buttoned enough to stay secure, were the leather chapareros or overalls; morocco slippers with the Catharine-wheel spurs attached; no vest; no neckerchief; a round jacket with quarter doubloons for buttons; and a low-crowned felt hat with a huge brim, a brim that could make a Quaker jealous and would have mortified a Chinese mandarin. This brim kept the sun out of my eyes, and there was also a narrow but thick turban or "pudding" as a hatband, which prevented the sun from penetrating my skull and frying my brains. The whole outfit, along with my horse’s gear, was embroidered with silver and adorned with golden buttons, which made it a bit less cool, but one can't expect perfection in life. If I had been in a stovepipe hat, a shooting coat, and riding breeches, I would have suffered much more from the heat. As it was, I admit that when I finally got home to Calle San Francisco, Mexico, I was extremely grateful. I'm not used to riding twenty-four miles in one day. I think I took a hot bath between taking off the chapareros and putting on my everyday pants. I think I fell asleep on the sofa for about an hour, and when I woke up, I ordered a cocktail to help me recover. Yes, Madam, there are cocktails in Mexico, and our Don's servant made them expertly. I also think I politely declined the Don's usual invitation for a drive before dinner in the Paseo. Neither a barouche, nor a mail-phaëton, nor a soft-cushioned brougham appealed to me. I felt very lazy and completely worn out.

The Don, however, went out for his drive, smiling at my woful plight. Is it only after hard riding that remorse succeeds enjoyment? I was left alone in his great caravansary of a mansion. I wandered from room to room, from corridor to corridor,—now glancing through the window-jalousies, and peeping at the chinas in their ribosos, and the shovel-hatted priests in the street below creeping along on the shady side of the way,—now hanging over the gallery in the inner court-yard, listening to the horses stamping in their stables or rattling their tethers against the mangers, listening now to the English grooms as they whistled the familiar airs of home while they rubbed their charges down, and now to the sleepy, plaintive drone of the Indian servants loitering over their work in the kitchens. Then I wandered back again,—from drawing-room to dining-room, from bedchamber to boudoir. And at last I found that I had crossed a bridge over another court-yard, and gotten into another house, abutting on another street. The Don was still lord here, and I was free to ramble. More drawing-rooms, more bedchambers, more boudoirs, a chapel, and at last a library. Libraries are not plentiful in Mexico. Here, on many shelves, was a goodly store of standard literature in many languages. Here was Prescott's History of the Conquest, translated into choice Castilian, and Señor Ramirez his comments thereupon. Here was Don Lucas Alaman[Pg 62] his History of Mexico, and works by Jesuit fathers innumerable. How ever did they get printed? Who ever bought, who ever read, those cloudy tomes in dog Latin? Here was Lord Kingsborough's vast work on Mexican Antiquities,—the work his Lordship is reported to have ruined himself in producing; and Macaulay, and Dickens, and Washington Irving, and the British Essayists, and the Waverley Novels, and Shakspeare, and Soyer's Cookery, and one little book of mine own writing: a very well-chosen library indeed.

The Don, however, went out for his drive, smiling at my miserable situation. Is it only after a tough ride that regret follows pleasure? I was left alone in his enormous mansion. I wandered from room to room, from hallway to hallway—now glancing through the window blinds and peeking at the china in their fancy displays, and the shovel-hatted priests outside creeping along in the shade—now leaning over the balcony in the inner courtyard, listening to the horses stamping in their stables or rattling their tethers against the feeders, listening to the English grooms whistling familiar tunes from home while they groomed the horses, and now to the lazy, mournful drone of the Indian servants dawdling over their work in the kitchens. Then I wandered back again—from the drawing-room to the dining room, from the bedroom to the boudoir. And eventually, I found that I had crossed a bridge over another courtyard and entered another house, adjacent to another street. The Don was still the master here, and I was free to explore. More drawing rooms, more bedrooms, more boudoirs, a chapel, and finally a library. Libraries are not common in Mexico. Here, on many shelves, was a rich collection of classic literature in multiple languages. Here was Prescott's History of the Conquest, translated into exquisite Castilian, along with Señor Ramirez's comments on it. Here was Don Lucas Alaman[Pg 62]'s History of Mexico, and countless works by Jesuit fathers. How did they even get printed? Who bought them, who read those dense volumes in dog Latin? Here was Lord Kingsborough's extensive work on Mexican Antiquities—the project his Lordship reportedly ruined himself over; and Macaulay, Dickens, Washington Irving, British Essayists, Waverley Novels, Shakespeare, Soyer's Cookery, and one little book of my own writing: a truly well-curated library indeed.

What have we here? A fat, comely, gilt-lettered volume, bound in red morocco, and that might, externally, have passed for my grandmother's edition of Dr. Doddridge's Sermons. As I live, 't is a work illustrated by George Cruikshank,—a work hitherto unknown to me, albeit I fancied myself rich, even to millionnairism, in Cruikshankiana. It is a rare book, a precious book, a book that is not in the British Museum, a book for which collectors would gladly give more doubloons than I lost at monte last night; for here the most moral people play monte. It is un costumbre del pais,—a custom of the country; and, woe is me! I lost a pile 'twixt midnight and cock-crow.

What do we have here? A big, attractive, gold-lettered book, bound in red leather, that could easily be mistaken for my grandmother's edition of Dr. Doddridge's Sermons. I can't believe it; it's a work illustrated by George Cruikshank—something I didn’t know existed, even though I thought I was loaded with Cruikshank stuff. It's a rare book, a valuable book, a book that's not in the British Museum, a book that collectors would happily trade more doubloons for than I lost at monte last night; because here, the most moral people play monte. It's a custom of the country; and sadly, I lost a fortune between midnight and dawn.

"Life in Paris; or the Rambles, Sprees, and Amours of Dick Wildfire, Squire Jenkins, and Captain O'Shuffleton, with the Whimsical Adventures of the Halibut Family, and Other Eccentric Characters in the French Metropolis. Embellished with Twenty-One Comic Vignettes and Twenty-One Colored Engravings of Scenes from Real Life, by George Cruikshank. London: Printed for John Cumberland. 1828." This "Life in Paris" was known to me by dim literary repute; but I had never seen, the actual volume before. Its publication was a disastrous failure. Emboldened by the prodigious success of "Life in London,"—the adventures in the Great Metropolis of Corinthian Tom and Jerry—Somebody—and Bob Logic, Esquire, written by Pierce Egan, once a notorious chronicler of the prize-ring, the compiler of a Slang Dictionary, and whose proficiency in argot and flash-patter was honored by poetic celebration from Byron, Moore, and Christopher North, but whom I remember, when I was first climbing into public life, a decrepit, broken-down old man,—Mr. John Cumberland, of Ludgate Hill, (the publisher, by the way, of that series of the "Acting Drama" to which, over the initials of D—G, and the figure of a hand pointing, some of the most remarkable dramatic criticisms in the English language are appended,) thought, not unreasonably, that "Life in Paris" might attain a vogue as extensive as that achieved by "Life in London." I don't know who wrote the French "Life." Pierce Egan could scarcely have been the author; for he was then at the height of a vicious and ephemeral popularity; and any book, however trashy, with his name to it, would have been sure to sell. This "Life in Paris" was very probably the work of some obscure hack, who, when he was describing the "eccentric characters in the French metropolis," may not impossibly have been vegetating in the Rules of the King's Bench Prison. But crafty Mr. Cumberland, to insure the success of his enterprise, secured the services of George Cruikshank as illustrator. George had a brother Robert, who had caught something of his touch and manner, but nothing of his humorous genius, and who assisted him in illustrating "Life in London"; but "Life in Paris" was to be all his own; and he undertook a journey to France in order to study Gallic life and make sketches. The results were now before me in twenty-one small vignettes on wood, (of not much account,) and of as many large aquatint engravings, (George can aquatint as well as etch,) crowded with figures, and displaying the unmistakable and inimitable Cruikshankian vim and point. There is Dick Wildfire being attired, with the aid of the friseur and the tailor, and under the sneering inspection of Sam Sharp, his Yorkshire valet, according to the latest Parisian fashions. Next we have Dick and[Pg 63] Captain O'Shuffleton (an Irish adventurer) "promenading in the Gardens of the Tuileries"; next, "real life" in the galleries of the Palais Royal; next, Dick, the Captain, Lady Halibut, and Lydia "enjoying a lounge on the Italian Boulevard." To these succeed a representation of a dinner at Véry's; Dick and his companions "smashing the glim on a spree by lamplight"; Dick and the Captain "paying their respects to the Fair Limonadière at the Café des Mille Colonnes"; Dick introduced by the Captain to a Rouge et Noir table; the same and his valet "showing fight in a Caveau"; "Life behind the Curtain of the Grand Opera, or Dick and the Squire larking with the Figurantes"; Dick and the Squire "enjoying the sport at the Combat of Animals, or Duck Lane of Paris"; Dick and Jenkins "in a Theatrical Pandemonium, or the Café de la Paix in all its glory"; "Life among the Dead, or the Halibut Family in the Catacombs"; "Life among the Connoisseurs," or Dick and his friends "in the Grand Gallery of the Louvre"; "a Frolic in the Café d'Enfer, or Infernal Cellar"; "Life on Tiptoe, or Dick quadrilling it in the Salons de Mars in the Champs Élysées"; the "Entrée to the Italian Opera"; the "Morning of the Fête of St. Louis"; the "Evening of the same, with Dick, Jenkins, and the Halibuts witnessing the Canaille in all their glory"; and, finally, "Life in a Billiard-Room, or Dick and the Squire au fait to the Parisian Sharpers."

"Life in Paris; or the Rambles, Sprees, and Amours of Dick Wildfire, Squire Jenkins, and Captain O'Shuffleton, with the Whimsical Adventures of the Halibut Family, and Other Eccentric Characters in the French Metropolis. Embellished with Twenty-One Comic Vignettes and Twenty-One Colored Engravings of Scenes from Real Life, by George Cruikshank. London: Printed for John Cumberland. 1828." I had heard about "Life in Paris" by its dim literary reputation, but I had never seen the actual book before. Its release was a complete failure. Encouraged by the huge success of "Life in London,"—the adventures in the Great Metropolis of Corinthian Tom and Jerry—Somebody—and Bob Logic, Esquire, written by Pierce Egan, who was once a famous chronicler of the prize-fighting scene, the creator of a Slang Dictionary, and whose skill in slang and street talk earned him poetic praise from Byron, Moore, and Christopher North, but whom I remember as a decrepit old man when I was just starting my public career,—Mr. John Cumberland, of Ludgate Hill, (by the way, the publisher of that series of the "Acting Drama" to which, under the initials of D—G and the symbol of a hand pointing, some of the most notable dramatic critiques in English are attached,) thought, quite reasonably, that "Life in Paris" might achieve a popularity as vast as that of "Life in London." I’m not sure who wrote the French "Life." Pierce Egan couldn't have been the author; he was at the peak of his fleetingly popular career, and any book, no matter how poor, with his name on it would have been guaranteed to sell. This "Life in Paris" was most likely created by some obscure writer who, when describing the "eccentric characters in the French metropolis," may well have been languishing in the Rules of the King's Bench Prison. But clever Mr. Cumberland, to ensure the success of his project, recruited George Cruikshank as the illustrator. George had a brother named Robert, who had picked up some of his style but none of his humor, and who helped him illustrate "Life in London"; but "Life in Paris" was to be entirely George's work, and he set off on a trip to France to study French life and to make sketches. The results were laid out before me in twenty-one small wood vignettes (not particularly notable) and as many large aquatint engravings (George can aquatint as well as etch), filled with figures, showcasing the unmistakable and unique Cruikshankian energy and charm. There’s Dick Wildfire getting dressed, with help from the hairdresser and the tailor, while being sneered at by his Yorkshire valet Sam Sharp, all according to the latest Parisian styles. Next, we see Dick and Captain O'Shuffleton (an Irish adventurer) "strolling in the Tuileries Gardens"; then "real life" in the Palais Royal galleries; next, Dick, the Captain, Lady Halibut, and Lydia "enjoying a stroll on the Italian Boulevard." Following these are scenes of a dinner at Véry’s; Dick and his friends "partying by lamplight"; Dick and the Captain "visiting the Fair Limonadière at the Café des Mille Colonnes"; Dick introduced by the Captain to a Rouge et Noir table; the same Dick and his valet "getting into a fight in a Caveau"; "Life behind the Curtain of the Grand Opera, or Dick and the Squire having fun with the Figurantes"; Dick and the Squire "enjoying action at the Combat of Animals, or Duck Lane of Paris"; Dick and Jenkins "in a Theatrical Pandemonium, or the Café de la Paix at its peak"; "Life among the Dead, or the Halibut Family in the Catacombs"; "Life among the Connoisseurs," or Dick and his friends "in the Grand Gallery of the Louvre"; "a Frolic in the Café d'Enfer, or Infernal Cellar"; "Life on Tiptoe, or Dick dancing in the Salons de Mars in the Champs Élysées"; the "Entry to the Italian Opera"; the "Morning of the Fête of St. Louis"; the "Evening of the same, with Dick, Jenkins, and the Halibuts watching the Canaille in all their glory"; and finally, "Life in a Billiard-Room, or Dick and the Squire in tune with the Parisian Sharpers."

I have said that these illustrations are full of point and drollery. They certainly lack that round, full touch so distinctive of George Cruikshank, and which he learned from Gillray; but such a touch can be given only when the shadows as well as the outlines of a plate are etched; and the intent of an aquatint engraving is, as the reader may or may not know, to produce the effect of a drawing in Indian ink.[C] Still there is much in these pictures to delight the Cruikshankian connoisseur,—infinite variety in physiognomy, wonderful minuteness and accuracy in detail, and here and there sparkles of the true Hogarthian satire.

I've mentioned that these illustrations are full of wit and humor. They definitely lack the round, rich style that is characteristic of George Cruikshank, which he picked up from Gillray; but that style can only be achieved when both the shadows and the outlines of a piece are etched. The purpose of an aquatint engraving is, as you might know, to create the look of a drawing in Indian ink.[C] Still, there's a lot in these images to please the Cruikshank fan—endless variety in facial expressions, amazing detail and accuracy, and glimpses of authentic Hogarthian satire.

But a banquet in which the plates only are good is but a Barmecide feast, after all. The letter-press to this "Life in Paris" is the vilest rubbish imaginable,—a farrago of St. Giles's slang, Tottenham Court Road doggerel, ignorance, lewdness, and downright dulness. Mr. John Cumberland, of Ludgate Hill, took, accordingly, very little by his motion. The "Life" fell almost stillborn from the press; and George Cruikshank must have regretted that he ever had anything to do with it. The major part of the impression must years ago have been used to line trunks, inwrap pies, and singe geese; but to our generation, and to those which are to come, this sorry volume will be more than a curiosity: it will be literarily and artistically an object of great and constantly increasing value. By the amateur of Cruikshankiana it will be prized for the reason that the celebrated Latin pamphlet proving that Edward VI. never had the toothache was prized, although the first and last leaves were wanting, by Theodore Hook's Tom Hill. It will be treasured for its scarcity. To the student of social history it will be of even greater value, as the record of a state of manners, both in England and France, which has wholly and forever passed away. The letter-press portraits, drawn by the hack author, of a party of English tourists are but foul and stupid libels; but their aquatint portraits, as bitten in by George Cruikshank, are, albeit exaggerated, true in many respects to Nature. In fact, we were used, when George IV. was king, to send abroad these overdressed and under-bred clowns and[Pg 64] Mohawks,—whelps of the squirarchy and hobbledehoys of the universities,—Squire Gawkies and Squire Westerns and Tony Lumpkins, Mrs. Malaprops and Lydia Languishes, by the hundred and the thousand. "The Fudge Family in Paris" and the letters of Mrs. Ramsbotham read nowadays like the most outrageous of caricatures; but they failed not to hit many a blot in the times which gave them birth. It was really reckoned fashionable in 1828 to make a visit to Paris the occasion for the coarsest of "sprees,"—to get tipsy at Véry's,—to "smash the glims,"—to parade those infamous Galeries de Bois in the Palais Royal which were the common haunt of abandoned women,—to beat the gendarmes, and, indeed, the first Frenchman who happened to turn up, merely on the ground that he was a Frenchman. But France and the French have changed since then, as well as England and the English. Are these the only countries in the world whose people and whose manners have turned volte-face within less than half a century? I declare that I read from beginning to end, the other day, a work called "Salmagundi," and that I could not recognize in one single page anything to remind me of the New York of the present day. Thus in the engravings to "Life in Paris" are there barely three which any modern Parisian would admit to possess any direct or truthful reference to Paris life as it is. People certainly continue to dine at Véry's; but Englishmen no longer get tipsy there, no longer smash the plates or kick the waiters. In lieu of dusky billiard-rooms, the resort of duskier sharpers, there are magnificent saloons, containing five, ten, and sometimes twenty billiard-tables. The Galeries de Bois have been knocked to pieces these thirty years. The public gaming-houses have been shut up. There are no longer any brutal dog-and-bear-baitings at the Barrière du Combat. There is no longer a Belle Limonadière at the Café des Mille Colonnes. Belles Limonadières (if I may be permitted to use one of the most inelegant, but the most expressive, of American colloquialisms) are "played out." The Catacombs have long since been shut to strangers. The Caveau exists no more. Old reprobates scarcely remember the Café d'Enfer. The Fête of St. Louis is as dead as Louis XVIII., as dead as the Fêtes of July, as the Fêtes of the Republic. There is but one national festival now,—and that is on the 15th of August, and in honor of St. Napoleon. There are no more "glims" to smash; the old oil reverbères have been replaced by showy gas-lamps, and the sergents de ville would make short work of any roisterers who attempted to take liberties with them. The old Paris of the Restoration and the Monarchy is dead; but the Thane of Cawdor—I mean George Cruikshank—lives, a prosperous gentleman.

But a banquet where only the plates are good is just a fake feast, in the end. The text for this "Life in Paris" is the worst rubbish imaginable—a mix of slang from St. Giles, clumsy Tottenham Court Road rhymes, ignorance, filth, and sheer dullness. Mr. John Cumberland of Ludgate Hill didn't gain much from it. The "Life" barely made it off the press; George Cruikshank must regret ever being involved with it. Most of the copies must have been used ages ago to line trunks, wrap pies, and singe geese; but for our generation and those to come, this bad book will be more than a curiosity: it will be recognized literarily and artistically as something of great and ever-growing value. Collectors of Cruikshankiana will cherish it for the same reason that Theodore Hook's Tom Hill valued the famous Latin pamphlet arguing that Edward VI. never had a toothache, even though the first and last pages were missing. It will be valued for its rarity. For students of social history, it will hold even greater significance, as it records a way of life, both in England and France, that has completely and permanently vanished. The text's portraits, drawn by the mediocre author, depict a group of English tourists as disgusting and foolish caricatures; yet George Cruikshank's aquatint portraits, though exaggerated, have some truth to them. In fact, we used to send these over-dressed and under-bred people abroad—those offspring of the gentry and awkward university students—Squire Gawkies, Squire Westerns, and Tony Lumpkins, Mrs. Malaprops and Lydia Languishes, by the hundreds and thousands. "The Fudge Family in Paris" and Mrs. Ramsbotham's letters read today like the most outrageous caricatures; but they certainly highlighted many flaws in the times that produced them. It was actually seen as trendy in 1828 to use a visit to Paris as an excuse for the rudest of parties—to get drunk at Véry's—to break things—to walk through the infamous Galeries de Bois in the Palais Royal, which were notorious hangouts for fallen women—to attack the gendarmes, and indeed any Frenchman who crossed your path, simply because he was French. But France and the French have changed since then, just as England and the English have. Are these the only countries in the world whose people and customs have flipped upside down in less than fifty years? I can say that I recently read a work called "Salmagundi" from start to finish, and I couldn’t find a single page that reminded me of today's New York. Thus, in the engravings of "Life in Paris," hardly three would be accepted by any modern Parisian as having any genuine reference to current Paris life. People still dine at Véry's; however, Englishmen no longer get drunk there, nor do they break plates or kick waiters. Instead of dark billiard rooms filled with shadier characters, there are grand salons featuring five, ten, and sometimes twenty billiard tables. The Galeries de Bois have been torn down for thirty years. Public gaming houses have been shut down. There are no more brutal dog and bear fights at the Barrière du Combat. The Café des Mille Colonnes has no more Belle Limonadières. Belle Limonadières (if I can use one of the most inelegant, yet most expressive, American slang terms) are "played out." The Catacombs have long been closed to visitors. The Caveau no longer exists. Even old-timers barely remember the Café d’Enfer. The Fête of St. Louis is as dead as Louis XVIII., as dead as the Fêtes of July, as those of the Republic. There is only one national celebration now—and that’s on August 15th, in honor of St. Napoleon. There are no more "glims" to break; the old oil lamps have been replaced by flashy gas lamps, and the city police would quickly deal with any rowdies trying to misbehave. The old Paris of the Restoration and the Monarchy is gone; but the Thane of Cawdor—I mean George Cruikshank—lives on, a successful gentleman.

I brought the book away with me from Mexico, all the way down to Vera Cruz, and so on to Cuba, and thence to New York; and it is in Boston with me now. But it is not mine. The Don did not even lend it to me. I had only his permission to take it from the library to my room, and turn it over there; but when I was coming away, that same body-servant, thinking it was my property, carefully packed it among the clothes in my portmanteau; and I did not discover his mistake and my temporary gain until I was off. I mention this in all candor; for I am conscious that there never was a book-collector yet who did not, at some period or other of his life, at least meditate the commission of a felony. But the Don is coming to the States this autumn, and I must show him that I have not been a fraudulent bailee. I shall have taken, at all events, my fill of pleasure from the book; and I hope that George Cruikshank will live to read what I have written; and God bless his honest old heart, anyhow!

I took the book with me from Mexico, all the way to Veracruz, then to Cuba, and finally to New York; now it's in Boston with me. But it's not mine. The Don didn’t even lend it to me. I only had his permission to borrow it from the library to my room and look at it there; however, when I was leaving, that same servant, thinking it was my property, carefully packed it among my clothes in my suitcase; I didn’t realize his mistake and my temporary gain until I was already gone. I mention this honestly; I know that no book collector has ever lived who hasn’t, at some point in their life, at least considered committing a theft. But the Don is coming to the States this fall, and I need to show him that I haven’t been dishonest. I’ll have certainly enjoyed the book; I hope that George Cruikshank lives to read what I've written, and may God bless his honest old heart, anyway!

FOOTNOTES:

[C] Aquatint engraving in England is all but a dead art. It is now employed only in portraits of race-horses, which are never sold uncolored, and in plates of the fashions. The present writer had the honor, twelve years since, of producing the last "great" work (so far as size was concerned) undertaken in England. It was a monster panorama, some sixty feet long, representing the funeral procession of the Duke of Wellington. It was published by the well-known house of Ackermann, in the Strand; and the writer regrets to say that the house went bankrupt very shortly afterwards.

[C] Aquatint engraving in England is nearly a lost art. It's now mainly used for portraits of racehorses, which are never sold uncolored, and in fashion plates. The author had the privilege, twelve years ago, of creating the last "great" work (in terms of size) done in England. It was a huge panorama, about sixty feet long, depicting the funeral procession of the Duke of Wellington. It was published by the well-known firm Ackermann on the Strand, and the author unfortunately has to mention that the company went bankrupt shortly afterward.


LEAVES FROM AN OFFICER'S JOURNAL.

III.

Camp Saxton, near Beaufort, S. C.
January 3, 1864.

Camp Saxton, located near Beaufort, South Carolina.
January 3, 1864.

Once, and once only, thus far, the water has frozen in my tent; and the next morning showed a dense white frost outside. We have still mocking-birds and crickets and rosebuds and occasional noonday baths in the river, though the butterflies have vanished, as I remember to have observed in Fayal, after December. I have been here nearly six weeks without a rainy day; one or two slight showers there have been, once interrupting a drill, but never dress parade. For climate, by day, we might be among the isles of Greece,—though it may be my constant familiarity with the names of her sages which suggests that impression. For instance, a voice just now called, near my tent,—"Cato, whar's Plato?"

Once, and only once, so far, the water has frozen in my tent, and the next morning revealed a thick white frost outside. We still have mockingbirds, crickets, rosebuds, and the occasional midday swims in the river, even though the butterflies have disappeared, just like I noticed in Fayal after December. I've been here for almost six weeks without a rainy day; there have been a couple of light showers, one even interrupting a drill, but never during dress parade. The climate, during the day, feels like we could be among the Greek islands—though that might just be my constant familiarity with the names of its philosophers that gives me that impression. For instance, just now, a voice called out near my tent, "Cato, where's Plato?"

The men have somehow got the impression that it is essential to the validity of a marriage that they should come to me for permission, just as they used to go to the master; and I rather encourage these little confidences, because it is so entertaining to hear them. "Now, Cunnel," said a faltering swain the other day, "I want for get me one good lady," which I approved, especially the limitation as to number. Afterwards I asked one of the bridegroom's friends whether he thought it a good match. "Oh, yes, Cunnel," said he, in all the cordiality of friendship, "John's gwine for marry Venus." I trust the goddess prove herself a better lady than she appeared during her previous career upon this planet. But this naturally suggests the isles of Greece again.

The guys seem to think that it’s crucial for the validity of a marriage that they come to me for permission, just like they used to go to the master; and I somewhat encourage these little confessions because they’re so amusing to hear. "Now, Colonel," said a nervous guy the other day, "I want to find me a good lady," which I supported, especially since he limited it to just one. Later, I asked one of the groom's friends if he thought it was a good match. "Oh, yes, Colonel," he replied, full of friendly enthusiasm, "John's going to marry Venus." I hope the goddess turns out to be a better lady than she seemed during her last time on this planet. But this naturally reminds me of the isles of Greece again.

January 7.—On first arriving, I found a good deal of anxiety among the officers as to the increase of desertions, that being the rock on which the "Hunter Regiment" split. Now this evil is very nearly stopped, and we are every day recovering the older absentees. One of the very best things that have happened to us was a half-accidental shooting of a man who had escaped from the guard-house, and was wounded by a squad sent in pursuit. He has since died; and this very evening, another man, who escaped with him, came and opened the door of my tent, after being five days in the woods, almost without food. His clothes were in rags, and he was nearly starved, poor foolish fellow, so that we can almost dispense with further punishment. Severe penalties would be wasted on these people, accustomed as they have been to the most violent passions on the part of white men; but a mild inexorableness tells on them, just as it does on any other children. It is something utterly new to them, and it is thus far perfectly efficacious. They have a great deal of pride as soldiers, and a very little of severity goes a great way, if it be firm and consistent. This is very encouraging.

January 7.—When I first arrived, there was a lot of worry among the officers about the rising number of desertions, which was the reason the "Hunter Regiment" fell apart. Thankfully, this issue is nearly under control now, and we’re recovering the older absentees every day. One of the best things that happened to us was the accidental shooting of a man who had escaped from the guardhouse; he was wounded by a squad that was chasing him. He has since died, and just this evening, another man who fled with him came to my tent after spending five days in the woods with almost no food. His clothes were torn, and he was nearly starving, poor guy, so we can almost skip any further punishment. Harsh penalties would be pointless for these individuals, given that they’ve been exposed to the most intense emotions from white men; however, showing mild firmness seems to work on them, just like it does with any other children. It’s a whole new experience for them, and so far, it’s been very effective. They take great pride in being soldiers, and just a little bit of discipline goes a long way if it’s consistent and firm. This is really encouraging.

The single question which I asked of some of the plantation-superintendents, on the voyage, was, "Do these people appreciate justice?" If they did, it was evident that all the rest would be easy. When a race is degraded beyond that point, it must be very hard to deal with them; they must mistake all kindness for indulgence, all strictness for cruelty. With these freed slaves there is no such trouble, not a particle: let an officer be only just and firm, with a cordial, kindly nature, and he has no sort of difficulty. The plantation-superintendents and teachers have the same experience, they say; but we have an immense advantage in the military organization, which helps in two ways: it increases their self-respect, and it gives us an admirable machinery for discipline, thus improving both the fulcrum and the lever.

The one question I asked some of the plantation supervisors during the journey was, "Do these people value justice?" If they do, everything else will be straightforward. When a group is degraded past that point, it becomes very challenging to manage them; they likely misinterpret kindness as indulgence and strictness as cruelty. With these freed slaves, there’s no such issue at all: as long as an officer is fair and firm, while also having a warm, kind personality, there are no problems. The plantation supervisors and educators share the same experience, or so they say; however, we have a significant advantage with the military structure, which helps in two ways: it boosts their self-respect and provides us with an excellent system for discipline, thus enhancing both the lever and the fulcrum.

The wounded man died in the hospital, and the general verdict seemed to[Pg 66] be, "Him brought it on heself." Another soldier died of pneumonia on the same day, and we had the funerals in the evening. It was very impressive. A dense mist came up, with a moon behind it, and we had only the light of pine-splinters, as the procession wound along beneath the mighty moss-hung branches of the ancient grove. The groups around the grave, the dark faces, the red garments, the scattered lights, the misty boughs, were weird and strange. The men sang one of their own wild chants. Two crickets sang also, one on either side, and did not cease their little monotone, even when the three volleys were fired above the graves. Just before the coffins were lowered, an old man whispered to me that I must have their position altered,—the heads must be towards the west; so it was done,—though they are in a place so veiled in woods that either rising or setting sun will find it hard to spy them.

The wounded man died in the hospital, and the general consensus seemed to[Pg 66] be, "He brought it on himself." Another soldier died of pneumonia on the same day, and we had the funerals in the evening. It was very moving. A thick mist rolled in, with a moon behind it, and we had only the light of pine splinters as the procession made its way beneath the huge, moss-covered branches of the ancient grove. The groups around the grave, the dark faces, the red clothing, the scattered lights, and the misty branches all looked surreal and strange. The men sang one of their own wild chants. Two crickets chirped as well, one on either side, and didn't stop their little song even when the three volleys were fired over the graves. Just before the coffins were lowered, an old man whispered to me that I needed to change their position—the heads should face west; so it was done—though they are in a spot so hidden in the woods that either the rising or setting sun will find it hard to see them.

We have now a good regimental hospital, admirably arranged in a deserted gin-house,—a fine well of our own within the camp-lines,—a ful-allowance of tents, all floored,—a wooden cook-house to every company, with sometimes a palmetto mess-house beside,—a substantial wooden guard-house, with a fireplace five feet "in de clar," where the men off duty can dry themselves and sleep comfortably in bunks afterwards. We have also a great circular school-tent, made of condemned canvas, thirty feet in diameter, and looking like some of the Indian lodges I saw in Kansas. We now meditate a regimental bakery. Our aggregate has increased from four hundred and ninety to seven hundred and forty, besides a hundred recruits now waiting at St. Augustine, and we have practised through all the main movements in battalion drill.

We now have a great regimental hospital, nicely set up in an abandoned bar, a well of our own within the camp, plenty of tents with floors, and a wooden cookhouse for each company, often accompanied by a palmetto mess hall. There’s also a sturdy wooden guardhouse with a fireplace five feet wide, where the off-duty men can dry off and sleep comfortably in bunks afterwards. We also have a large circular school tent made from old canvas, thirty feet in diameter, resembling some of the Indian lodges I saw in Kansas. We’re planning to create a regimental bakery. Our numbers have grown from four hundred and ninety to seven hundred and forty, plus a hundred recruits waiting in St. Augustine, and we’ve practiced all the main movements in battalion drill.

Affairs being thus prosperous, and yesterday having been six weeks since my last and only visit to Beaufort, I rode in, glanced at several camps, and dined with the General. It seemed absolutely like reëntering the world; and I did not fully estimate my past seclusion till it occurred to me, as a strange and novel phenomenon, that the soldiers at the other camps were white.

Affairs being this good, and with it being six weeks since my last and only visit to Beaufort, I rode in, looked at several camps, and had dinner with the General. It felt completely like stepping back into the world; I didn’t fully realize how isolated I had been until I noticed, as a strange and new observation, that the soldiers in the other camps were white.

January 8.—This morning I went to Beaufort again, on necessary business, and by good luck happened upon a review and drill of the white regiments. The thing that struck me most was that same absence of uniformity, in minor points, that I noticed at first in my own officers. The best regiments in the Department are represented among my captains and lieutenants, and very well represented, too; yet it has cost much labor to bring them to any uniformity in their drill. There is no need of this, for the prescribed "Tactics" approach perfection: it is never left discretionary in what place an officer shall stand, or in what words he shall give his order. All variation would seem to imply negligence. Yet even West Point occasionally varies from the "Tactics,"—as, for instance, in requiring the line officers to face down the line, when each is giving the order to his company. In our strictest Massachusetts regiments this is not done.

January 8.—This morning I went to Beaufort again for some important business and, luckily, I stumbled upon a review and drill of the white regiments. What struck me the most was the same lack of uniformity in minor details that I initially noticed in my own officers. The best regiments in the Department are represented among my captains and lieutenants, and they are well represented, too; still, it has required a lot of effort to bring them to any consistency in their drill. There’s really no need for this, since the prescribed "Tactics" are nearly perfect: it’s never left up to an officer to decide where to stand or what words to use when giving orders. Any variation seems to suggest carelessness. Yet even West Point occasionally deviates from the "Tactics,"—for example, by requiring the line officers to face down the line when each is giving orders to their company. In our strictest Massachusetts regiments, this is not done.

It needs an artist's eye to make a perfect drill-master. Yet the small points are not merely a matter of punctilio; for, the more perfectly a battalion is drilled on the parade-ground, the more quietly it can be handled in action. Moreover, the great need of uniformity is this: that, in the field, soldiers of different companies, and even of different regiments, are liable to be intermingled, and a diversity of orders may throw everything into confusion. Confusion means Bull Run.

It takes an artist's eye to be a great drill master. However, these small details are not just about strictness; the better a battalion is trained on the parade ground, the more smoothly it can be managed in combat. Additionally, the need for uniformity arises because soldiers from different companies and even different regiments can end up mixed together on the field, and varying orders can lead to chaos. Chaos can lead to a disaster like Bull Run.

I wished my men at the review to-day; for, amidst all the rattling and noise of artillery and the galloping of cavalry, there was only one infantry movement that we have not practised, and that was done by only one regiment, and apparently considered quite a novelty, though it is easily taught,—forming square by Casey's method: forward on centre.

I wanted my men at the review today; because, with all the noise of artillery and the sound of galloping cavalry, there was only one infantry maneuver we hadn't practiced, and it was performed by just one regiment. It seemed to be seen as quite a novelty, even though it's easy to teach—forming a square using Casey's method: forward on center.

It is really just as easy to drill a regiment as a company,—perhaps easier,[Pg 67] because one has more time to think; but it is just as essential to be sharp and decisive, perfectly clear-headed, and to put life into the men. A regiment seems small when one has learned how to handle it, a mere handful of men; and I have no doubt that a brigade or a division would soon appear equally small. But to handle either judiciously,—ah, that is another affair!

It’s just as easy to train a regiment as it is to train a company—maybe even easier[Pg 67] because you have more time to think; but it’s just as important to be sharp and decisive, perfectly clear-headed, and to inspire the men. A regiment feels small once you know how to manage it, just a handful of people; and I’m sure that a brigade or a division would soon seem just as small. But managing either effectively—well, that’s a different story!

So of governing: it is as easy to govern a regiment as a school or a factory, and needs like qualities,—system, promptness, patience, tact; moreover, in a regiment one has the aid of the admirable machinery of the army, so that I see very ordinary men who succeed very tolerably.

So regarding leadership: it's just as easy to lead a military unit as it is to manage a school or a factory, and requires similar qualities—organization, quickness, patience, and skill; plus, in a military unit, you have the excellent structure of the army to support you, which is why I see quite average people who do reasonably well.

Reports of a six months' armistice are rife here, and the thought is deplored by all. I cannot believe it, yet sometimes one feels very anxious about the ultimate fate of these poor people. After the experience of Hungary, one sees that revolutions may go backward; and the habit of injustice seems so deeply impressed upon the whites, that it is hard to believe in the possibility of anything better. I dare not yet hope that the promise of the President's Proclamation will be kept. For myself I can be indifferent, for the experience here has been its own daily and hourly reward; and the adaptedness of the freed slaves for drill and discipline is now thoroughly demonstrated and must soon be universally acknowledged. But it would be terrible to see this regiment disbanded or defrauded.

Reports of a six-month ceasefire are everywhere, and everyone is upset about it. I can't believe it, but sometimes I can't help but worry about the future of these poor people. After what happened in Hungary, it’s clear that revolutions can actually go backward; the pattern of injustice seems so deeply ingrained in the whites that it’s hard to imagine things getting better. I can’t dare to hope that the promise of the President's Proclamation will be honored. For me, I can stay indifferent because my experiences here have been rewarding in their own right; it’s clear now that the freed slaves are well-suited for training and discipline, and this will soon be recognized universally. But it would be awful to see this regiment disbanded or cheated out of their rights.

January 12.—Many things glide by without time to narrate them. On Saturday we had a mail with the President's Second Message of Emancipation, and the next day it was read to the men. The words themselves did not stir them very much, because they have been often told that they were free, especially on New-Year's Day, and, being unversed in politics, they do not understand, as well as we do, the importance of each additional guaranty. But the chaplain spoke to them afterwards very effectively, as usual; and then I proposed to them to hold up their hands and pledge themselves to be faithful to those still in bondage. They entered heartily into this, and the scene was quite impressive, beneath the great oak-branches. I heard afterwards that only one man refused to raise his hand, saying bluntly that his wife was out of slavery with him, and he did not care to fight. The other soldiers of his company were very indignant, and shoved him about among them while marching back to their quarters, calling him "Coward." I was glad of their exhibition of feeling, though it is very possible that the one who had thus the moral courage to stand alone among his comrades might be more reliable, on a pinch, than some who yielded a more ready assent. But the whole response, on their part, was very hearty, and will be a good thing to which to hold them hereafter, at any time of discouragement or demoralization,—which was my chief reason for proposing it. With their simple natures, it is a great thing to tie them to some definite committal; they never forget a marked occurrence, and never seem disposed to evade a pledge.

January 12.—A lot of things happen without the chance to explain them. On Saturday, we received the President's Second Message of Emancipation, and the next day it was shared with the men. The words didn't move them much because they’ve often been told they were free, especially on New Year's Day, and since they're not familiar with politics, they don’t fully grasp the significance of each new assurance the way we do. However, the chaplain spoke to them afterwards in a very impactful way, as he usually does; then I suggested they raise their hands and commit to being faithful to those who are still enslaved. They eagerly joined in, and the scene was quite powerful beneath the large oak branches. I later heard that only one man refused to raise his hand, bluntly saying that his wife was free with him and he wasn't interested in fighting. The other soldiers in his company were very upset and pushed him around while marching back to their quarters, calling him a "Coward." I appreciated their display of feelings, although it’s quite possible that the one who had the moral courage to stand alone among his peers might be more dependable in tough times than some who readily agreed. Overall, their response was very passionate, and it will serve as a solid point to refer back to if they face any discouragement or demoralization—which was my main reason for suggesting it. With their straightforward natures, it’s important to connect them to some clear commitment; they never forget a significant event and never seem inclined to back out of a promise.

It is this capacity of honor and fidelity which gives me such entire faith in them as soldiers. Without it, all their religious demonstration would be mere sentimentality. For instance, every one who visits the camp is struck with their bearing as sentinels. They exhibit, in this capacity, not an upstart conceit, but a steady, conscientious devotion to duty. They would stop their idolized General Saxton, if he attempted to cross their beat contrary to orders: I have seen them. No feeble or incompetent race could do this. The officers tell many amusing instances of this fidelity, but I think mine the best.

It’s their ability to show honor and loyalty that gives me complete confidence in them as soldiers. Without that, all their displays of faith would just be empty gestures. For example, anyone who visits the camp notices how they act as sentinels. They show, in this role, not arrogance, but a steady, dedicated commitment to their duty. They would stop their beloved General Saxton if he tried to cross their post against orders—I’ve seen it happen. No weak or unskilled group could do this. The officers share many funny stories about this loyalty, but I think mine is the best.

It was very dark the other night,—an unusual thing here,—and the rain fell in torrents; so I put on my India-rubber suit, and went the rounds of the sentinels, incognito, to test them. I can only say that I shall never try such an experiment again, and have cautioned my officers against it. 'T is a wonder I escaped with life and limb,—such a charging of bayonets and clicking of[Pg 68] gun-locks. Sometimes I tempted them by refusing to give any countersign, but offering them a piece of tobacco, which they could not accept without allowing me nearer than the prescribed bayonet's distance. Tobacco is more than gold to them, and it was touching to watch the struggle in their minds; but they always did their duty at last, and I never could persuade them. One man, as if wishing to crush all his inward vacillations at one fell stroke, told me stoutly that he never used tobacco, though I found next day that he loved it as much as any one of them. It seemed wrong thus to tamper with their fidelity; yet it was a vital matter to me to know how far it could be trusted, out of my sight. It was so intensely dark that not more than one or two knew me, even after I had talked with the very next sentinel, especially as they had never seen me in India-rubber clothing, and I can always disguise my voice. It was easy to distinguish those who did make the discovery; they were always conscious and simpering when their turn came; while the others were stout and irreverent till I revealed myself, and then rather cowed and anxious, fearing to have offended.

It was really dark the other night—an unusual thing here—and the rain was pouring down. So I put on my rain gear and went around to check on the sentinels, incognito, to see how they were doing. I can just say that I will never try that again and have warned my officers against it. It's a wonder I got out of it in one piece—there was so much charging of bayonets and the clicking of[Pg 68] gun-locks. Sometimes I tempted them by refusing to give the countersign, offering them a piece of tobacco instead, which they couldn’t take without letting me closer than the allowed distance of the bayonet. Tobacco means more to them than gold, and it was touching to see the struggle in their minds; but they always did their duty in the end, and I could never convince them. One guy, trying to overcome his inner conflict all at once, insisted that he never used tobacco, even though I found out the next day that he liked it as much as anyone. It felt wrong to mess with their loyalty, but it was crucial for me to know how much I could trust them when I wasn’t around. It was so dark that only one or two recognized me, even after I talked to the very next sentinel, especially since they had never seen me in rain gear, and I can always disguise my voice. It was easy to spot those who figured it out; they were aware and grinning when it was their turn, while the others were bold and irreverent until I revealed myself, then they looked a bit cowed and worried, afraid they had offended me.

It rained harder and harder, and when I had nearly made the rounds, I had had enough of it, and, simply giving the countersign to the challenging sentinel, undertook to pass within the lines.

It rained harder and harder, and when I had almost finished my rounds, I had enough of it, and, just giving the password to the challenging guard, decided to go inside the lines.

"Halt!" exclaimed this dusky man and brother, bringing down his bayonet,—"de countersign not correck."

"Halt!" shouted this dark-skinned man and brother, lowering his bayonet, "the password is incorrect."

Now the magic word, in this case, was "Vicksburg," in honor of a rumored victory. But as I knew that these hard names became quite transformed upon their lips, "Carthage" being familiarized into Cartridge, and "Concord" into Corn-cob, how could I possibly tell what shade of pronunciation my friend might prefer for this particular proper name?

Now the magic word here was "Vicksburg," in celebration of a supposed victory. But since I knew these challenging names often got twisted on their tongues, with "Carthage" turning into Cartridge and "Concord" into Corn-cob, how could I know what version of this specific name my friend would like best?

"Vicksburg," I repeated, blandly, but authoritatively, endeavoring, as zealously as one of Christy's Minstrels, to assimilate my speech to any supposed predilection of the Ethiop vocal organs.

"Vicksburg," I repeated, casually but confidently, trying, as eagerly as one of Christy's Minstrels, to adapt my speech to match any imagined preference of the African American vocal style.

"Halt dar! Countersign not correck," was the only answer.

"Halt there! The countersign is not correct," was the only reply.

The bayonet still maintained a position which, in a military point of view, was impressive.

The bayonet still held a position that, from a military perspective, was impressive.

I tried persuasion, orthography, threats, tobacco, all in vain. I could not pass in. Of course my pride was up; for was I to defer to an untutored African on a point of pronunciation? Classic shades of Harvard, forbid! Affecting scornful indifference, I tried to edge away, proposing to myself to enter the camp at some other point, where my elocution would be better appreciated. Not a step could I stir.

I tried convincing them, spelling it out, making threats, even smoking, but it was all pointless. I couldn't get in. Naturally, my pride was hurt because why should I listen to an uneducated African about pronunciation? Classic Harvard, forbid that! Trying to act like I didn’t care, I planned to move away and sneak into the camp from another angle where my speaking skills would be recognized. But I couldn’t budge an inch.

"Halt!" shouted my gentleman again, still holding me at his bayonet's point, and I wincing and halting.

"Halt!" my gentleman shouted again, still keeping me at the point of his bayonet, and I flinched and stopped.

I explained to him the extreme absurdity of this proceeding, called his attention to the state of the weather, which, indeed, spoke for itself so loudly that we could hardly hear each other speak, and requested permission to withdraw. The bayonet, with mute eloquence, refused the application.

I explained to him how ridiculous this was, pointed out the weather, which was so loud that we could barely hear each other, and asked if I could leave. The bayonet, without saying a word, denied my request.

There flashed into my mind, with more enjoyment in the retrospect than I had experienced at the time, an adventure on a lecturing tour in other years, when I had spent an hour in trying to scramble into a country tavern, after bed-time, on the coldest night of winter. On that occasion I ultimately found myself stuck midway in the window, with my head in a temperature of 80°, and my heels in a temperature of -10°, with a heavy window-sash pinioning the small of my back. However, I had got safe out of that dilemma, and it was time to put an end to this one.

Suddenly, I remembered an adventure from a past lecture tour that I enjoyed looking back on more than I did at the time. It was the coldest night of winter, and I had spent an hour trying to get into a country tavern after hours. At one point, I found myself stuck in the window, with my head in a warm 80° and my feet in a freezing -10°, while a heavy window was pinning my lower back. Eventually, I managed to escape that embarrassing situation, and now it was time to resolve this one.

"Call the corporal of the guard," said I, at last, with dignity, unwilling either to make a night of it or to yield my incognito.

"Call the corporal of the guard," I said finally, with dignity, not wanting to spend the night there or give up my anonymity.

"Corporal ob de guard!" he shouted, lustily,—"Post Number Two!" while I could hear another sentinel chuckling with laughter. This last was a special guard, placed over a tent, with a prisoner in charge. Presently he broke silence.[Pg 69]

"Corporal on guard!" he shouted enthusiastically, "Post Number Two!" while I could hear another guard laughing. This one was a special guard, assigned to a tent with a prisoner in custody. After a moment, he spoke up. [Pg 69]

"Who am dat?" he asked, in a stage whisper. "Am he a buckra [white man]?"

"Who is that?" he asked in a quiet voice. "Is he a white man?"

"Dunno whether he been a buckra or not," responded, doggedly, my Cerberus in uniform; "but I's bound to keep him here till de corporal ob de guard come."

"Dunno if he’s a white guy or not," my uniformed guard replied stubbornly, "but I have to keep him here until the corporal of the guard arrives."

Yet, when that dignitary arrived, and I revealed myself, poor Number Two appeared utterly transfixed with terror, and seemed to look for nothing less than immediate execution. Of course I praised his fidelity, and the next day complimented him before the guard, and mentioned him to his captain; and the whole affair was very good for them all. Hereafter, if Satan himself should approach them in darkness and storm, they will take him for "de Cunnel," and treat him with special severity.

Yet, when that important person showed up, and I revealed myself, poor Number Two looked completely frozen with fear and seemed to expect nothing less than immediate execution. Of course, I praised his loyalty, and the next day I complimented him in front of the guards and mentioned him to his captain; the whole situation ended up being very beneficial for all of them. From now on, if Satan himself were to come to them in darkness and storm, they'd think he was "the Colonel" and treat him with extra harshness.

January 13.—In many ways the childish nature of this people shows itself. I have just had to make a change of officers in a company which has constantly complained, and with good reason, of neglect and improper treatment. Two excellent officers have been assigned to them; and yet they sent a deputation to me in the evening, in a state of utter wretchedness. "We's bery grieved dis evening, Cunnel; 'pears like we couldn't bear it, to lose de Cap'n and de Lieutenant, all two togeder." Argument was useless; and I could only fall back on the general theory, that I knew what was best for them, which had much more effect; and I also could cite the instance of another company, which had been much improved by a new captain, as they readily admitted. So with the promise that the new officers should not be "savage to we," which was the one thing they deprecated, I assuaged their woes. Twenty-four hours have passed, and I hear them singing most merrily all down that company-street.

January 13.—In many ways, the childish nature of these people shows. I just had to change the officers in a company that has constantly complained, and rightly so, about neglect and mistreatment. Two great officers were assigned to them; and yet they sent a delegation to me in the evening, completely distraught. "We're very upset this evening, Colonel; it feels like we can't handle losing the Captain and the Lieutenant, both at the same time." Arguing was pointless; I could only rely on the general idea that I knew what was best for them, which had much more impact. I also pointed out another company that improved significantly with a new captain, which they readily admitted. So, with the promise that the new officers wouldn't be "harsh to us," which was the one thing they feared, I eased their worries. Twenty-four hours have passed, and I hear them singing happily all down that company street.

I often notice how their griefs may be dispelled, like those of children, merely by permission to utter them: if they can tell their sorrows, they go away happy, even without asking to have anything done about them. I observe also a peculiar dislike of all intermediate control: they always wish to pass by the company officer, and deal with me personally for everything. General Saxton notices the same thing with the people on the plantations as regards himself. I suppose this proceeds partly from the old habit of appealing to the master against the overseer. Kind words would cost the master nothing, and he could easily put off any non-fulfilment upon the overseer. Moreover, the negroes have acquired such constitutional distrust of white people, that it is perhaps as much as they can do to trust more than one person at a time. Meanwhile this constant personal intercourse is out of the question in a well-ordered regiment; and the remedy for it is to introduce by degrees more and more of system, so that their immediate officers will become all-sufficient for the daily routine.

I often see how their grief can be eased, like that of children, just by letting them express it: if they can share their sorrow, they leave feeling happy, even without expecting anything to be done about it. I also notice a strong dislike of all intermediate control: they always want to go straight to me for everything instead of going through the company officer. General Saxton has observed the same thing with the people on the plantations regarding himself. I guess this comes partly from the old habit of appealing to the master against the overseer. Kind words wouldn't cost the master anything, and he could easily shift any blame onto the overseer. Moreover, the black people have developed such deep-seated distrust of white people that it’s probably a stretch for them to trust more than one person at a time. Meanwhile, this constant personal interaction isn’t feasible in a well-organized regiment; the solution is to gradually introduce more structure so that their immediate officers can handle the daily routine effectively.

It is perfectly true (as I find everybody takes for granted) that the first essential for an officer of colored troops is to gain their confidence. But it is equally true, though many persons do not appreciate it, that the admirable methods and proprieties of the regular army are equally available for all troops, and that the sublimest philanthropist, if he does not appreciate this, is unfit to command them.

It’s absolutely true (as I find everyone assumes) that the first essential for an officer of colored troops is to earn their trust. But it’s also true, although many people don’t realize it, that the excellent methods and standards of the regular army can be applied to all troops, and that the most noble philanthropist, if he doesn’t understand this, is not fit to lead them.

Another childlike attribute in these men, which is less agreeable, is a sort of blunt insensibility to giving physical pain. If they are cruel to animals, for instance, it always reminds me of children pulling off flies' legs, in a sort of pitiless, untaught, experimental way. Yet I should not fear any wanton outrage from them. After all their wrongs, they are not really revengeful; and I would far rather enter a captured city with them than with white troops, for they would be more subordinate. But for mere physical suffering they would have no fine sympathies. The cruel things they have seen and undergone have helped to blunt them; and if I ordered them to put to death a dozen prisoners, I think they would do it without remonstrance.[Pg 70]

Another childlike quality in these men, which is less pleasant, is a kind of blunt insensitivity to causing physical pain. For example, when they are cruel to animals, it always reminds me of children ripping off the legs of flies in a callous, untrained, experimental way. However, I wouldn’t worry about any wanton violence from them. Despite all their wrongs, they aren't actually vengeful; I would much rather go into a captured city with them than with white troops, as they would be more compliant. But when it comes to mere physical suffering, they lack any genuine empathy. The cruel things they have witnessed and experienced have made them numb; if I ordered them to execute a dozen prisoners, I believe they would do it without protest.[Pg 70]

Yet their religious spirit grows more beautiful to me in living longer with them: it is certainly far more so than at first, when it seemed rather a matter of phrase and habit. It influences them both on the negative and the positive side. That is, it cultivates the feminine virtues first,—makes them patient, meek, resigned. This is very evident in the hospital; there is nothing of the restless, defiant habit of white invalids. Perhaps, if they had more of this, they would resist disease better. Imbued from childhood with the habit of submission, drinking in through every pore that other-world trust which is the one spirit of their songs, they can endure everything. This I expected; but I am relieved to find that their religion strengthens them on the positive side also,—gives zeal, energy, daring. They could easily be made fanatics, if I chose; but I do not choose. Their whole mood is essentially Mohammedan, perhaps, in its strength and its weakness; and I feel the same degree of sympathy that I should, if I had a Turkish command,—that is, a sort of sympathetic admiration, not tending towards agreement, but towards coöperation. Their philosophizing is often the highest form of mysticism; and our dear surgeon declares that they are all natural transcendentalists. The white camps seem rough and secular, after this; and I hear our men talk about "a religious army," "a Gospel army," in their prayer-meetings. They are certainly evangelizing the chaplain, who was rather a heretic at the beginning; at least, this is his own admission. We have recruits on their way from St. Augustine, where the negroes are chiefly Roman Catholics; and it will be interesting to see how their type of character combines with that elder creed.

Yet their religious spirit becomes more beautiful to me the longer I spend with them. It's definitely much more so than at first when it seemed more like phrases and habits. It influences them both negatively and positively. It fosters the feminine virtues first—makes them patient, gentle, and accepting. This is very clear in the hospital; there's none of the restless, defiant attitude of white patients. Maybe if they had more of that, they'd resist illness better. Since childhood, they've been raised to submit, absorbing that trust in something beyond this world, which is the essence of their songs, allowing them to endure anything. I expected this, but I’m relieved to find that their faith empowers them positively as well—bringing passion, energy, and bravery. They could easily become fanatics if I wanted; but I don’t want that. Their entire mindset is fundamentally Mohammedan, both in its strengths and weaknesses; and I feel a similar sort of sympathy as I would if I had a Turkish command—that is, a sympathetic admiration that doesn't lean towards agreement but towards cooperation. Their deep thinking often reflects a profound mysticism, and our dear surgeon claims they are all natural transcendentalists. The white camps feel rough and secular after this; and I hear our men discussing "a religious army," "a Gospel army," during their prayer meetings. They are certainly influencing the chaplain, who was a bit of a heretic at the start; at least, that's his own admission. We have recruits coming in from St. Augustine, where the black community is mostly Roman Catholic; and it will be interesting to see how their character type blends with that older faith.

It is time for rest; and I have just looked out into the night, where the eternal stars shut down, in concave protection, over the yet glimmering camp, and Orion hangs above my tent-door, giving to me the sense of strength and assurance which these simple children obtain from their Moses and the Prophets. Yet external Nature does its share in their training; witness that most poetic of all their songs, which always reminds me of the "Lyke-Wake Dirge" in the "Scottish Border Minstrelsy":—

It’s time to rest; I just looked out into the night, where the eternal stars shine down in a protective curve over the still-glimmering camp, and Orion hangs above my tent door, giving me a sense of strength and reassurance, much like what these simple children get from their Moses and the Prophets. Yet the outside world plays its part in their upbringing; just think of that most poetic of all their songs, which always makes me think of the "Lyke-Wake Dirge" in the "Scottish Border Minstrelsy":—

"I know the rise of the moon, I know the rise of the stars;
Lay this body down.
I walk in the moonlight, I walk in the starlight,
To lay this body down.
I'll stroll through the graveyard, I'll walk through the graveyard,
To lay this body down.
I'll lie in the grave and stretch out my arms; Lay this body down.
I go to the Judgment in the evening of the day. When I lay this body down;
And my soul and your soul will connect on that day. "When I lay this body down."

January 14.—In speaking of the military qualities of the blacks, I should add, that the only point where I am disappointed is one I have never seen raised by the most incredulous newspaper critics,—namely their physical condition. They often look magnificently to my gymnasium-trained eye; and I always like to observe them when bathing,—such splendid muscular development, set off by that smooth coating of adipose tissue which makes them, like the South-Sea Islanders, appear even more muscular than they are. Their skins are also of finer grain than those of whites, the surgeons say, and certainly are smoother and far more free from hair. Their weakness is pulmonary; pneumonia and pleurisy are their besetting ailments; they are easily made ill,—and easily cured, if promptly treated: childish organization again. Guard-duty injures them more than whites, apparently; and double-quick movements, in choking dust, set them coughing badly. But then it is to be remembered that this is their sickly season, from January to March, and that their healthy season will come in summer, when the whites break down. Still my conviction of the physical superiority of more highly civilized races is strengthened on the whole, not weakened, by observing them. As to availability for military drill and duty in other respects, the only question I ever hear debated among the officers is,[Pg 71] whether they are equal or superior to whites. I have never heard it suggested that they were inferior, although I expected frequently to hear such complaints from hasty or unsuccessful officers.

January 14.—When discussing the military qualities of Black individuals, I should mention that the only area where I'm disappointed is one I’ve never seen addressed by the most skeptical newspaper critics—specifically, their physical condition. To my gym-trained eye, they often look magnificent; I always enjoy watching them when they bathe—such impressive muscular development, enhanced by that smooth layer of fat that makes them, like the South-Sea Islanders, appear even more muscular than they actually are. Their skin is also said to be finer than that of white individuals, according to surgeons, and is definitely smoother and much less hairy. Their vulnerability is in their lungs; pneumonia and pleurisy are common issues for them; they get sick easily—but can be easily treated if addressed promptly: a sign of their delicate constitution. Guard duty seems to be tougher on them than on whites, and rapid movements, especially in dusty conditions, trigger their coughing. However, it's important to note that this is their vulnerable period, from January to March, and their healthier season arrives in summer, when whites tend to struggle. Still, my belief in the physical superiority of more advanced civilized groups is generally reinforced, not diminished, by my observations of them. As for their suitability for military training and duty in other aspects, the only debate I hear among the officers is whether they are equal to or better than whites. I have yet to hear anyone suggest they are inferior, even though I expected to hear such complaints from quick-tempered or unsuccessful officers.

Of one thing I am sure, that their best qualities will be wasted by merely keeping them for garrison duty. They seem peculiarly fitted for offensive operations, and especially for partisan warfare; they have so much dash and such abundant resources, combined with such an Indian-like knowledge of the country and its ways. These traits have been often illustrated in expeditions sent after deserters. For instance, I despatched one of my best lieutenants and my best sergeant with a squad of men to search a certain plantation, where there were two separate negro villages. They went by night, and the force was divided. The lieutenant took one set of huts, the sergeant the other. Before the lieutenant had reached his first house, every man in the village was in the woods, innocent and guilty alike. But the sergeant's mode of operation was thus described by a corporal from a white regiment who happened to be in one of the negro houses. He said that not a sound was heard until suddenly a red leg appeared in the open doorway, and a voice outside said, "Rally." Going to the door, he observed a similar pair of red legs before every hut, and not a person was allowed to go out, until the quarters had been thoroughly searched, and the three deserters found. This was managed by Sergeant Prince Rivers, our color-sergeant, who is provost-sergeant also, and has entire charge of the prisoners and of the daily policing of the camp. He is a man of distinguished appearance, and in old times was the crack coachman of Beaufort, in which capacity he once drove Beauregard from this plantation to Charleston, I believe. They tell me that he was once allowed to present a petition to the Governor of South Carolina in behalf of slaves, for the redress of certain grievances; and that a placard, offering two thousand dollars for his recapture, is still to be seen by the wayside between here and Charleston. He was a sergeant in the old "Hunter Regiment," and was taken by General Hunter to New York last spring, where the chevrons on his arm brought a mob upon him in Broadway, whom he kept off till the police interfered. There is not a white officer in this regiment who has more administrative ability, or more absolute authority over the men; they do not love him, but his mere presence has controlling power over them. He writes well enough to prepare for me a daily report of his duties in the camp: if his education reached a higher point, I see no reason why he should not command the Army of the Potomac. He is jet-black, or rather, I should say, wine-black; his complexion, like that of others of my darkest men, having a sort of rich, clear depth, without a trace of sootiness, and to my eye very handsome. His features are tolerably regular, and full of command, and his figure superior to that of any of our white officers,—being six feet high, perfectly proportioned, and of apparently inexhaustible strength and activity. His gait is like a panther's; I never saw such a tread. No anti-slavery novel has described a man of such marked ability. He makes Toussaint perfectly intelligible; and if there should ever be a black monarchy in South Carolina, he will be its king.

Of one thing I'm sure: their best qualities will be wasted just keeping them for regular duty. They seem especially suited for offensive operations, particularly for guerrilla warfare; they have so much energy and so many resources, combined with an Indian-like understanding of the land and its ways. These traits have been demonstrated many times in missions after deserters. For example, I sent one of my best lieutenants and my best sergeant with a squad of men to search a specific plantation where there were two separate black communities. They went at night, and the team was split up. The lieutenant took one set of huts, while the sergeant handled the other. Before the lieutenant even reached his first house, every person in the village was in the woods, both innocent and guilty. However, the sergeant's approach was described by a corporal from a white regiment who happened to be in one of the black houses. He said that not a sound was heard until suddenly, a pair of red legs appeared in the open doorway, and a voice outside called, "Rally." When he went to the door, he saw a similar pair of red legs in front of each hut, and no one was allowed to leave until the quarters had been thoroughly searched and the three deserters found. This was managed by Sergeant Prince Rivers, our color-sergeant, who is also the provost-sergeant and has full responsibility for the prisoners and daily security of the camp. He has a distinguished appearance and was once the top coachman in Beaufort, where he drove Beauregard from this plantation to Charleston, I believe. People say he was once allowed to present a petition to the Governor of South Carolina on behalf of slaves for the resolution of certain grievances, and that a poster offering two thousand dollars for his capture is still visible along the road between here and Charleston. He was a sergeant in the old "Hunter Regiment" and was taken by General Hunter to New York last spring, where the chevrons on his arm attracted a mob on Broadway, which he managed to keep at bay until the police stepped in. No white officer in this regiment has more administrative skills or authority over the men; they don’t love him, but his mere presence exercises control over them. He writes well enough to prepare a daily report of his duties in the camp: if his education went further, I see no reason why he shouldn't lead the Army of the Potomac. He is jet-black—or, more accurately, wine-black; his complexion, like that of my darkest men, has a rich, clear depth without a trace of dullness, and to my eye, very handsome. His features are fairly regular and commanding, and his physique surpasses that of any of our white officers—standing six feet tall, perfectly proportioned, and seemingly full of boundless strength and energy. His walk is like a panther's; I've never seen anything like it. No anti-slavery novel has portrayed a man with such remarkable ability. He makes Toussaint perfectly understandable; if there were ever a black monarchy in South Carolina, he would be its king.

January 15.—This morning is like May. Yesterday I saw bluebirds and a butterfly; so this winter of a fortnight is over. I fancy a trifle less coughing in the camp. We hear of other stations in the Department where the mortality, chiefly from yellow fever, has been frightful. Dr. —— is rubbing his hands professionally over the fearful tales of the surgeon of a New York regiment, just from Key West, who has had two hundred cases of the fever. "I suppose he is a skilful, highly educated man," said I; "Yes," he responded with enthusiasm. "Why, he had seventy deaths!"—as if that proved his superiority past question.[Pg 72]

January 15.—This morning feels like May. Yesterday, I saw bluebirds and a butterfly, so it seems this brief winter is over. I think there’s a little less coughing in the camp. We hear about other stations in the Department where the death rate, mainly from yellow fever, has been terrible. Dr. —— is eagerly discussing the horrifying stories from the surgeon of a New York regiment, who just came from Key West and has dealt with two hundred cases of the fever. "I assume he’s a skilled, well-educated man," I said; "Yes," he replied enthusiastically. "He had seventy deaths!"—as if that proved his undeniable expertise.[Pg 72]

January 19.

January 19.

"First, sitting proudly like a king on his throne,
At the front of the group rode Sir Richard Tyrone.

But I fancy that Sir Richard felt not much better satisfied with his following than I to-day. J. R. L. said once that nothing was quite so good as turtle-soup, except mock-turtle; and I have heard officers declare that nothing was so stirring as real war, except some exciting parade. To-day, for the first time, I marched the whole regiment through Beaufort and back,—the first appearance of such a novelty on any stage. They did march splendidly: this all admit. M——'s prediction was fulfilled:

But I think that Sir Richard is probably not feeling much more satisfied with his followers than I am today. J. R. L. once said that nothing is quite as good as turtle soup, except for mock-turtle; and I’ve heard officers claim that there’s nothing as thrilling as real war, except for a lively parade. Today, for the first time, I marched the entire regiment through Beaufort and back—this is the first time anything like this has happened. They marched beautifully: everyone agrees. M——'s prediction came true:

"Will not —— be in bliss? A thousand men, every one black as a coal!" I confess it. To look back on twenty broad double-ranks of men, (for they marched by platoons,)—every polished musket having a black face beside it, and every face set steadily to the front,—a regiment of freed slaves marching on into the future,—it was something to remember; and when they returned through the same streets, marching by the flank, with guns at a "support," and each man covering his file-leader handsomely, the effect on the eye was almost as fine. The band of the Eighth Maine joined us at the entrance of the town, and escorted us in. Sergeant Rivers said ecstatically afterwards, in describing the affair,—"And when dat band wheel in before us, and march on,—my God! I quit dis world altogeder." I wonder if he pictured to himself the many dusky regiments, now unformed, which I seemed to see marching up behind us, gathering shape out of the dim air.

"Will there not be bliss? A thousand men, all as black as coal!" I admit it. Looking back at twenty wide double ranks of men, (since they marched in platoons)—every shiny musket with a black face beside it, and each face focused straight ahead—a regiment of freed slaves moving toward the future—it was something to remember; and when they returned through the same streets, marching alongside, with guns at the "ready," and each man covering his file leader perfectly, the visual effect was almost as striking. The band of the Eighth Maine joined us at the town entrance and escorted us in. Sergeant Rivers later said ecstatically while describing the event, "And when that band turned in front of us and marched on—my God! I completely lost track of this world." I wonder if he envisioned the many dark regiments, now unformed, which I seemed to see marching up behind us, taking shape out of the misty air.

I had cautioned the men, before leaving camp, not to be staring about them as they marched, but to look straight to the front, every man; and they did it with their accustomed fidelity, aided by the sort of spontaneous eye-for-effect which is in all their melodramatic natures. One of them was heard to say exultingly afterwards,—"We didn't look to de right nor to de leff. I didn't see notin' in Beaufort. Eb'ry step was worth a half-a-dollar." And they all marched as if it were so. They knew well that they were marching through throngs of officers and soldiers who had drilled as many months as we had drilled weeks, and whose eyes would readily spy out every defect. And I must say, that, on the whole, with a few trivial exceptions, those spectators behaved in a manly and courteous manner, and I do not care to write down all the handsome things that were said. Whether said or not, they were deserved; and there is no danger that our men will not take sufficient satisfaction in their good appearance. I was especially amused at one of our recruits, who did not march in the ranks, and who said, after watching the astonishment of some white soldiers,—"De buckra sojers look like a man who been-a-steal a sheep,"—that is, I suppose, sheepish.

I had warned the men, before leaving camp, not to be looking around as they marched but to keep their eyes straight ahead, every single one of them; and they did this with their usual commitment, boosted by their natural flair for drama. One of them was heard to say excitedly afterward, "We didn't look to the right or to the left. I didn't see anything in Beaufort. Every step was worth fifty cents." And they all marched as if that was true. They knew they were passing lots of officers and soldiers who had trained for as many months as we had trained for weeks, and who could easily spot any mistakes. Overall, I must say, with a few minor exceptions, those spectators acted in a strong and respectful manner, and I won't bother listing all the nice things that were said. Whether expressed or not, they were deserved; and it's clear our men were proud of their appearance. I was particularly amused by one of our recruits, who wasn’t marching with the rest and, after noticing the surprise of some white soldiers, remarked, "The white soldiers look like a man who's just stolen a sheep," meaning, I guess, they looked sheepish.

After passing and repassing through the town, we marched to the parade-ground and went through an hour's drill, forming squares and reducing them, and doing other things which look hard on paper and are perfectly easy in fact; and we were to have been reviewed by General Saxton, but he had been unexpectedly called to Ladies Island, and did not see us at all, which was the only thing to mar the men's enjoyment. Then we marched back to camp, (three miles,) the men singing the "John Brown Song," and all manner of things,—as happy creatures as one can well conceive.

After going back and forth through the town, we marched to the parade ground and did an hour of drills, forming squares and breaking them down, along with other activities that seem tough on paper but are actually quite easy; we were supposed to be reviewed by General Saxton, but he was unexpectedly called to Ladies Island and didn’t see us at all, which was the only thing that dampened the men's enjoyment. Then we marched back to camp (three miles), with the men singing the "John Brown Song" and all sorts of things—just as happy as you can imagine.

It is worth mentioning, before I close, that we have just received an article about "Negro Troops," from the London "Spectator," which is so admirably true to our experience that it seems as if written by one of us. I am confident that there never has been, in any American newspaper, a treatment of the subject so discriminating and so wise.

It’s important to note, before I finish, that we just got an article about "Black Troops" from the London "Spectator," which reflects our experiences so perfectly that it feels like it was written by one of us. I believe there has never been, in any American newspaper, a discussion of the topic that is so insightful and thoughtful.

January 21.—To-day brought a visit from Major-General Hunter and his staff, by General Saxton's invitation,—the former having just arrived in the Department. I expected them at dress parade, but they came during battalion drill, rather to my dismay, and we were caught in our old clothes. It was our first review,[Pg 73] and I dare say we did tolerably; but of course it seemed to me that the men never appeared so ill before,—just as one always thinks a party at one's own house a failure, even if the guests seem to enjoy it, because one is so keenly sensitive to every little thing that goes wrong. After review and drill, General Hunter made the men a little speech, at my request, and told them that he wished there were fifty thousand of them. General Saxton spoke to them afterwards, and said that fifty thousand muskets were on their way for colored troops. The men cheered both the Generals lustily; and they were complimentary afterwards, though I knew that the regiment could not have appeared nearly so well as on its visit to Beaufort. I suppose I felt like some anxious mamma whose children have accidentally appeared at dancing-school in their old clothes.

January 21.—Today we had a visit from Major-General Hunter and his staff, thanks to an invitation from General Saxton. The former had just arrived in the Department. I expected them to come to the dress parade, but instead, they showed up during the battalion drill, which was disappointing, and we were caught in our old uniforms. This was our first review,[Pg 73] and I must say we did reasonably well; however, it seemed to me that the men had never looked worse—just like how you often think a party at your own house is a flop, even if the guests seem to enjoy it, because you're acutely aware of every little thing that goes wrong. After the review and drill, General Hunter gave the men a brief speech at my request, expressing his wish that there were fifty thousand of them. General Saxton spoke to them afterward, mentioning that fifty thousand muskets were on their way for colored troops. The men cheered for both Generals enthusiastically; they complimented us afterward, although I knew the regiment couldn't have looked nearly as good as when we visited Beaufort. I suppose I felt like an anxious mom whose kids accidentally showed up at dance class in their old clothes.

General Hunter promises us all we want,—pay when the funds arrive, Springfield rifled muskets, and blue trousers. Moreover, he has graciously consented that we should go on an expedition along the coast, to pick up cotton, lumber, and, above all, recruits. I declined an offer like this just after my arrival, because the regiment was not drilled or disciplined, not even the officers; but it is all we wish for now.

General Hunter promises us everything we want—payment when the funds come in, Springfield rifled muskets, and blue pants. Plus, he has generously agreed that we can go on an expedition along the coast to gather cotton, timber, and, most importantly, recruits. I turned down a similar offer right after I arrived because the regiment wasn’t trained or disciplined, not even the officers; but it's all we want now.

"What do I care how dark my skin is?
"Forty pounds will marry me,"

quoth Mother Goose. Forty rounds will marry us to the American Army, past divorcing, if we can only use them well. Our success or failure may make or mar the prospects of colored troops. But it is well to remember in advance that military success is really less satisfactory than any other, because it may depend on a moment's turn of events, and that may be determined by some trivial thing, neither to be anticipated nor controlled. Napoleon ought to have won at Waterloo by all reasonable calculations; but who cares? All that one can expect is, to do one's best, and to take with equanimity the fortune of war.[D]

quoth Mother Goose. Forty rounds will connect us to the American Army, beyond separating, if we can just use them wisely. Our success or failure might shape the future of colored troops. But it's important to remember upfront that military success is really less fulfilling than any other kind, because it can hinge on a moment's change in circumstances, which might be influenced by something insignificant, impossible to predict, or control. Napoleon should have won at Waterloo by all reasonable assessments; but who really cares? All one can hope for is to do their best and accept the outcomes of war with composure.[D]

FOOTNOTES:

[D] In coming to the record of more active service, the Journal form must be abandoned. The next chapter will give some account of an expedition up the St. Mary's River.

[D] To document a more active service, we need to move away from the Journal format. The next chapter will provide details about an expedition up the St. Mary's River.


THE AMERICAN METROPOLIS.

A little more than two centuries ago the site of New York City was bought by its first white owners for twenty-four dollars. The following tabular statement exhibits the steps of its progressive settlement since then.

A little more than two hundred years ago, the land that is now New York City was purchased by its first white owners for twenty-four dollars. The following table shows the steps of its development over time.

Year.Population.Year.Population.
16561,0001820123,706 
16732,5001825166,089 
16964,3021830202,589 
17318,6281835270,068 
175610,3811840312,852 
177321,8761845371,223 
178623,6141850515,394 
179033,1311855629,810 
180060,4891860814,254 
181096,37318641,000,000+

Taking the first census as a point of departure, the population of New York doubled itself in about eleven years. During the first century it increased a little more than tenfold. It was doubled again in less than twenty years; the next thirty years quadrupled it; and another period of twenty years doubled it once more. Its next duplication consumed the shorter term of eighteen years. It more than doubled again during the fifteen years preceding the last census; and the four years since that census have witnessed an increase of nearly twenty-three per cent. This final estimate is of course liable to correction by next year's census, but its error will be found on the side of under-statement, rather than of exaggeration.

Taking the first census as a starting point, New York's population doubled in about eleven years. During the first century, it increased by a little over ten times. It doubled again in less than twenty years; the next thirty years saw it quadruple; and another twenty-year span doubled it once more. The next doubling took just eighteen years. It more than doubled again during the fifteen years before the last census; and the four years since that census have seen an increase of nearly twenty-three percent. This final estimate might be adjusted by next year's census, but any error will likely be on the side of underestimating rather than exaggerating.

The property on the north-west corner of Broadway and Chamber Street, now[Pg 74] occupied in part by one of Delmonico's restaurants, was purchased by a New York citizen, but lately deceased, for the sum of $1,000: its present value is $125,000. A single Broadway lot, surveyed out of an estate which cost the late John Jay $500 per acre, was recently sold at auction for $80,000, and the purchaser has refused a rent of $16,000 per annum, or twenty per cent on his purchase-money, for the store which he has erected on the property. In 1826, the estimated total value of real estate in the city of New York was $64,804,050. In 1863, it had reached a total of $402,196,652, thus increasing more than sixfold within the lifetime of an ordinary business-generation. In 1826, the personal estate of New York City, so far as could be arrived at for official purposes, amounted to $42,434,981. In 1863, the estimate of this class of property-values was $192,000,161. It had thus more than quadrupled in a generation.

The property at the northwest corner of Broadway and Chamber Street, now[Pg 74] partly occupied by one of Delmonico's restaurants, was bought by a recently deceased New Yorker for $1,000. Its current value is $125,000. A single Broadway lot, taken from an estate that cost the late John Jay $500 per acre, was sold at auction recently for $80,000, and the buyer has turned down a rent offer of $16,000 per year, or twenty percent of his purchase price, for the store he built on the property. In 1826, the estimated total value of real estate in New York City was $64,804,050. By 1863, it had soared to $402,196,652, increasing more than six times within a typical business generation's lifetime. In 1826, the total personal property value in New York City, as far as could be determined for official records, was $42,434,981. By 1863, this estimate had risen to $192,000,161. Thus, it more than quadrupled in a generation.

But statistics are most eloquent through illustration. Let us look discursively about the city of New York at various periods of her career since the opening of the present century. I shall assume that a map of the city is everywhere attainable, and that the reader has a general acquaintance with the physical and political geography of the United States.

But statistics speak most powerfully through examples. Let’s take a look around the city of New York at different times in her history since the start of this century. I’ll assume that a map of the city is readily available and that the reader has a good understanding of the physical and political geography of the United States.

Not far from the beginning of the century, Wall Street, as its name implies, was the northern boundary of the city of New York. The present north boundary of civilized settlement is almost identical with the statutory limit of the city, or that of the island itself. There is no perceptible break, though there are gradations of compactness, in the settled district between the foot of the island and Central Park. Beyond the Park, Haarlem Lane, Manhattanville, and Carmansville take up the thread of civic population, and carry it, among metropolitan houses and lamp-posts, quite to the butment of High Bridge. It has been seriously proposed to legislate for the annexation of a portion of Westchester to the bills of mortality, and this measure cannot fail to be demanded by the next generation; but for the present we will consider High Bridge as the north end of the city. Let us compare the boundary remembered by our veterans with that to which metropolitan settlement has been pushed by them and their children. In the lifetime of our oldest business-men, the advance wave of civic refinement, convenience, luxury, and population has travelled a distance greater than that from the Westminster Palaces to the hulks at the Isle of Dogs. When we consider that the population of the American Metropolis lives better, on the average, than that of any earthly capital, and that ninety-nine hundredths of all our suffering poor are the overflow of Great Britain's pauperism running into our grand channels a little faster than we can direct its current to the best advantage,—under these circumstances the advance made by New York in less than a century toward the position of the world's metropolis is a more important one than has been gained by London between the time of Julius Cæsar and the present century.

Not long after the start of the century, Wall Street, as the name suggests, marked the northern edge of New York City. Today, the northern boundary of where people settle is almost the same as the city limits or the edge of the island itself. There’s no noticeable gap, although there are varying levels of density, in the developed area from the southern tip of the island to Central Park. Beyond the Park, Harlem Lane, Manhattanville, and Carmansville continue the urban population, extending among city buildings and streetlights all the way to the base of High Bridge. There’s been serious talk about adding part of Westchester to the city limits, a change that the next generation will likely demand; but for now, we’ll consider High Bridge as the northern end of the city. Let’s compare the boundary that our elders remember with the area where city life has expanded thanks to them and their children. In the lifetime of our oldest business people, the wave of urban improvement, comfort, luxury, and population has moved a greater distance than from the Westminster Palaces to the docks at the Isle of Dogs. When we think about how the average person in the American metropolis lives better than in any other capital in the world, and that almost all of our struggling poor are just an overflow from Britain’s poverty, which is moving into our city faster than we can manage it effectively, it’s clear that the progress New York has made in less than a century toward becoming the world’s metropolis is more significant than what London achieved from the time of Julius Caesar to today.

I know an excellent business-man who was born in his father's aristocratic residence in Beaver Street. Holborn is as aristocratic now. Another friend of mine still living, the freshest of sexagenarians, told me lately of a walk he took in boyhood which so much fatigued him, that, when he was a long way out in the fields, he sat down to rest on the steps of a suburban hospital. I guessed Bellevue; but he replied that it was the New York Hospital, standing in what we now call the lower part of Broadway, just opposite North Pearl Street. No part of the Strand or of the Boulevards is less rural than the vast settled district about the New York Hospital at this day. It stands at least four times farther within than it then did beyond the circumference of New York civilization. I remember another illustration of its relative situation early in the century,—a story of good old Doctor Stone, who excused himself from his position of manager by saying, that, as the infirmities of age grew on him, he[Pg 75] found the New York Hospital so far out in the country that he should be obliged, if he stayed, to keep "a horse and cheer."

I know a really good businessman who was born in his father's upscale home on Beaver Street. Holborn is just as fancy now. Another friend of mine, the liveliest guy in his sixties, recently told me about a walk he took as a kid that wore him out so much that, when he was far out in the fields, he sat down to rest on the steps of a suburban hospital. I guessed it was Bellevue, but he said it was the New York Hospital, located in what we now refer to as the lower part of Broadway, right across from North Pearl Street. No part of the Strand or the Boulevards is less rural than the huge developed area around the New York Hospital today. It stands at least four times farther into the city than it did back then, beyond the edges of New York civilization. I remember another example of its relative location from early in the century—a story about the good old Doctor Stone, who said he had to resign from his role as manager because, as he got older, he found the New York Hospital so far out in the country that he would have to keep "a horse and cheer" if he stayed.

Many New-Yorkers, recognized among our young and active men, can recollect when Houston Street was called North Street because it was practically the northern boundary of the settled district. Middle-aged men remember the swamp of Lispenard's Meadow, which is now the dryest part of Canal Street; some recall how they crossed other parts of the swamp on boards, and how tide-water practically made a separate island of what is now the northern and much the larger portion of the city. Young men recollect making Saturday-afternoon appointments with their schoolfellows (there was no time on any other day) to go "clear out into the country," bathe in the rural cove at the foot of East Thirteenth Street, and, refreshed by their baths, proceed to bird's-nesting on the wilderness of the Stuyvesant Farm, where is now situate Stuyvesant Park, one of the loveliest and most elegant pleasure-grounds open to the New York public, surrounded by one of the best-settled portions of the city, in every sense of the word. Still younger men remember Fourteenth Street as the utmost northern limit of the wave of civilization; and comparative boys have seen Franconi's Hippodrome pitched in a vacant lot of the suburbs, where now the Fifth Avenue Hotel stands, at the entrance to a double mile of palaces, in the northern, southern, and western directions.

Many New Yorkers, especially among our young and active men, can remember when Houston Street was called North Street because it was basically the northern edge of the developed area. Middle-aged men recall the swamp of Lispenard's Meadow, which is now the driest part of Canal Street; some remember crossing other parts of the swamp on wooden planks, and how the tide turned what is now the northern and much larger part of the city into a separate island. Young men remember making Saturday afternoon plans with their friends (there was no time on any other day) to go "way out into the country," swim in the rural cove at the foot of East Thirteenth Street, and, after their swims, go bird-nesting in the wild area of Stuyvesant Farm, where Stuyvesant Park now sits—one of the most beautiful and elegant parks open to the public in New York, surrounded by one of the best-settled parts of the city, in every sense of the term. Even younger men remember Fourteenth Street as the farthest northern limit of civilization; and younger lads have seen Franconi's Hippodrome set up in a vacant lot in the suburbs, where the Fifth Avenue Hotel now stands, at the entrance to a double mile of palaces in the northern, southern, and western directions.

We may safely affirm, that, since the organization of the science of statistics, no city in the world has ever multiplied its population, wealth, and internal resources of livelihood with a rapidity approaching that shown by New York. London has of late years made great progress quantitively, but her means of accommodating a healthy and happy population have kept no adequate pace with the increase of numbers. During the year 1862, 75,000 immigrants landed at the port of New York; in 1863, 150,000 more; and thus far in 1864 (we write in November) 200,000 have debarked here. Of these 425,000 immigrants, 40 per cent have stayed in the city. Of the 170,000 thus staying, 90 per cent, or 153,000, are British subjects; and of these, it is not understating to say that five eighths are dependent for their livelihood on physical labor of the most elementary kind. By comparing these estimates with the tax-list, it will appear that we have pushed our own inherent vitality to an extent of forty millions increase in our taxable property, and contributed to the support of the most gigantic war in human annals, during the period that we received into our grand civic digestion a city of British subjects as large as Bristol, and incorporated them into our own body politic with more comfort both to mass and particles than either had enjoyed at home.

We can confidently say that since the establishment of statistics as a science, no city in the world has increased its population, wealth, and internal resources as rapidly as New York. London has made significant quantitative progress in recent years, but its ability to support a healthy and happy population has not kept up with the growing numbers. In 1862, 75,000 immigrants arrived at the port of New York; in 1863, 150,000 more; and up to now in 1864 (as we write in November), 200,000 have landed here. Out of these 425,000 immigrants, 40 percent have remained in the city. Of the 170,000 who stayed, 90 percent, or 153,000, are British subjects; and it’s not an exaggeration to say that about five-eighths of them rely on basic physical labor for their livelihood. By comparing these figures with the tax records, we can see that we have significantly boosted our own economic potential, with a forty million increase in our taxable property, and contributed to supporting the largest war in history, all while integrating a population of British subjects as large as Bristol into our civic body, providing more comfort to both the whole and its individuals than they experienced back home.

There are still some people who regard the settlement of countries and the selection of great capitals as a matter of pure romantic accident. Philosophers know, that, if, at the opening of the Adamic period, any man had existed with a perfect knowledge of the world's physical geography and the laws of national development, he would have been able to foretell a priori the situations of all the greatest capitals. It is a law as fixed as that defining the course of matter in the line of least resistance, that population flows to the level where the best livelihood is most easily obtained. The brute motives of food and raiment must govern in their selection of residence nine tenths of the human race. A few noble enthusiasts, like those of Plymouth Colony, may leave immortal footprints on a rugged coast, exchanging old civilization for a new battle with savagery, and abandoning comfort with conformity for a good conscience with privation. Still, had there been back of Plymouth none of the timber, the quarries, the running streams, the natural avenues of inland communication, and to some extent the agricultural capabilities which make good subsistence possible, there would have been no Boston, no Lynn, no Lowell, no New[Pg 76] Bedford, no healthy or wealthy civilization of any kind, until the Pilgrim civilization had changed its base. It may be generally laid down that the men who leave home for truth's sake exile themselves as much for the privilege to mere opportunity of living truly.

Some people still think that the settlement of countries and the choice of major capitals is just a matter of pure chance. Philosophers believe that if, at the start of human civilization, someone had perfect knowledge of the world's geography and the laws of national development, they could have predicted the locations of all the greatest capitals. It’s as certain as the principle that matter follows the path of least resistance: people move to places where they can easily find the best living. The basic needs for food and clothing influence where about ninety percent of the human population decides to live. A few passionate individuals, like those from Plymouth Colony, might leave a lasting impact on a harsh shoreline, trading old civilization for a new struggle against wilderness, and sacrificing comfort for a clear conscience in times of hardship. However, without the resources like timber, quarries, flowing streams, natural routes for inland transport, and some extent of agricultural potential that make good living possible, Plymouth wouldn’t have led to Boston, Lynn, Lowell, New Bedford, or any healthy or wealthy civilization. It can generally be said that those who leave home in search of truth exile themselves just as much for the chance to live authentically.

New York was not even in the first place settled by enthusiasts. Trade with the savages, nice little farms at Haarlem, a seat among the burgomasters, the feast of St. Nicholas, pipes and Schiedam, a vessel now and then in the year bringing over letters of affection ripened by a six months' voyage, some little ventures, and two or three new colonists,—these were the joys which allured the earliest New-Yorkers to the island now swarming from end to end with almost national vitalities. Not until 1836, when the Italian Opera was first domiciled in New York, on the corner of Leonard and Church Streets, could the second era of metropolitan life be said fully to have set in there,—the era when people flow toward a city for the culture as well as the livelihood which it offers them. About the same time American studios began to be thronged with American picture-buyers; and there is no need of referring to the rapid advance of American literature, and the wide popularization of luxuries, dating from that period.

New York wasn't originally settled by enthusiasts. It was all about trade with the Native Americans, cozy little farms in Haarlem, a position among the local leaders, the celebration of St. Nicholas, drinks and Schiedam, and occasionally getting letters of affection after a six-month voyage, along with some small business ventures and a few new colonists—these were the attractions that drew the first New Yorkers to the island, now bustling with nearly national energy. It wasn't until 1836, when the Italian Opera first established itself in New York at the corner of Leonard and Church Streets, that the second phase of city life truly began—a time when people flocked to cities for both culture and the livelihoods they provided. Around this time, American studios started to fill up with American art buyers; and we need not mention the rapid growth of American literature and the widespread availability of luxury items that began during this period.

Long prior to that, New York was growing with giant vitality. She possesses, as every great city must possess preëminent advantages for the support of a vast population and the employment of immense industries. If she could not feed a million of men better than Norfolk, Norfolk would be New York and New York Norfolk. If the products of the world were not more economically exchanged across her counter than over that of Baltimore, Baltimore would need to set about building shelter for half a million more heads than sleep there to-night. Perth Amboy was at one time a prominent rival of New York in the struggle for the position of the American Metropolis, and is not New York only because Nature said No!

Long before that, New York was growing with incredible energy. It has, like every major city, crucial advantages that support a large population and large industries. If it couldn't feed a million people better than Norfolk, then Norfolk would be New York and New York would be Norfolk. If the products of the world couldn't be exchanged more efficiently here than in Baltimore, then Baltimore would have to start building homes for half a million more people than are sleeping there tonight. At one point, Perth Amboy was a strong competitor of New York in the race to become the American Metropolis, and New York is not what it is today simply because nature decided otherwise!

Let us invite the map to help us in our investigation of New York's claim to the metropolitan rank. There are three chief requisites for the chief city of every nation. It must be the city in easiest communication with other countries,—on the sea-coast, if there be a good harbor there, or on some stream debouching into the best harbor that there is. It must be the city in easiest communication with the interior, either by navigable streams, or valleys and mountain-passes, and thus the most convenient rendezvous for the largest number of national interests,—the place where Capital and Brains, Import and Export, Buyer and Seller, Doers and Things to be Done, shall most naturally make their appointments to meet for exchange. Last, (and least, too,—for even cautious England will people jungles for money's sake,) the metropolis must enjoy at least a moderate sanitary reputation; otherwise men who love Fortune well enough to die for her will not be reinforced by another large class who care to die on no account whatever.

Let's use the map to help us investigate New York's claim to be a major city. There are three main requirements for the primary city of any nation. It should be the city that has the easiest connections with other countries—either on the coast, if there’s a good harbor, or on a river that leads to the best harbor available. It must also be the city with the easiest access to the interior, whether through navigable rivers, valleys, or mountain passes, making it the most convenient meeting place for the greatest number of national interests—the spot where capital and creativity, imports and exports, buyers and sellers, doers and tasks naturally come together for transactions. Lastly, (and this is the least important—since even cautious England will settle jungles for profit) the metropolis needs to have at least a decent reputation for health; otherwise, people who love wealth enough to risk their lives for it won’t be joined by a large group that prefers to avoid dying at all.

New York answers all these requisites better than any metropolis in the world. She has a harbor capable of accommodating all the fleets of Christendom, both commercial and belligerent. That harbor has a western ramification, extending from the Battery to the mouth of Spuyten Duyvil Creek,—a distance of fifteen miles; an eastern ramification, reaching from the Battery to the mouth of Haarlem River,—seven miles; and a main trunk, interrupted by three small islands, extending from the Battery to the Narrows,—a distance of about eight miles more. It is rather under-estimating the capacity of the East River branch to average its available width as low as eighty rods; a mile and a half will be a proportionately moderate estimate for the Hudson River branch; the greatest available width of the Upper Bay is about four miles, in a line from the Long Island to the Staten Island side. If we add to these combined areas the closely adjacent waters in hourly communication with New York by her tugs and lighters,[Pg 77] her harbor will further include a portion of the channel running west of Staten Island, and of the rivers emptying into Newark Bay, with the whole magnificent and sheltered roadstead of the Lower Bay, the mouth of Shrewsbury Inlet, and a portion of Raritan Bay.

New York meets all these requirements better than any city in the world. It has a harbor that can accommodate all the fleets of Christendom, both commercial and military. That harbor has a western extension, stretching from the Battery to the mouth of Spuyten Duyvil Creek—a distance of fifteen miles; an eastern extension, reaching from the Battery to the mouth of Harlem River—seven miles; and a main section, interrupted by three small islands, extending from the Battery to the Narrows—a distance of about eight more miles. It's a bit of an underestimate to say the East River branch averages its available width as low as eighty rods; a mile and a half is a relatively moderate estimate for the Hudson River branch; the greatest available width of the Upper Bay is about four miles, in a line from the Long Island side to Staten Island. If we add these combined areas to the nearby waters that are constantly communicating with New York via the tugs and lighters,[Pg 77] the harbor will also include part of the channel west of Staten Island, and the rivers flowing into Newark Bay, along with the entire magnificent and sheltered roadstead of the Lower Bay, the mouth of Shrewsbury Inlet, and part of Raritan Bay.

As this paper must deal to a sufficient extent with statistics in matters of practical necessity, we will at this stage leave the reader to complete for himself the calculation of such a harbor's capacity. In this respect, in that of shelter, of contour of water-front, of accessibility from the high seas, New York Harbor has no rival on the continent. The Bay of San Francisco more nearly equals it than any other; but that is on the Pacific side, for the present much farther from the axis of national civilization, and backed by a much narrower agricultural tract. We will not refer to disadvantages of commercial exchange, since San Francisco may at any time be relieved of these by a Pacific Railroad. On our Atlantic side there is certainly no harbor which will compare for area and convenience with that of New York.

As this paper needs to cover statistics that are practically necessary, we'll leave it to the reader to calculate a harbor's capacity on their own. In terms of shelter, water-front shape, and access from the open sea, New York Harbor has no competition on the continent. The Bay of San Francisco comes the closest, but that’s on the Pacific side, which is currently much further from the center of national development and surrounded by a much smaller agricultural area. We won't discuss the drawbacks of commercial trade, since San Francisco could easily overcome these with a Pacific Railroad. On the Atlantic side, there really isn't any harbor that can match New York in terms of size and convenience.

It is not only the best harbor on our coast, but that in easiest communication with other parts of the country. To the other portions of the coast it is as nearly central as it could be without losing fatally in other respects. Delaware and Chesapeake Bays afford fine roadsteads; but the low sand barrens and wet alluvial flats which form their shores compelled Philadelphia and Baltimore to retire their population such a distance up the chief communicating rivers as to deprive them of many important advantages proper to a seaport. Under the influence of free ideas may be expected a wonderful development of the advantages of Chesapeake Bay. Good husbandry and unshackled enterprise throughout Maryland and Virginia will astonish Baltimore by an increase of her population and commerce beyond the brightest speculative dreams. The full resources of Delaware Bay are far from being developed. Yet Philadelphia and Baltimore are forever precluded from competing with New York, both by their greater distance from open water and the comparative inferiority of the interior tracts with which they have ready communication. Below Chesapeake Bay the coast system of great river-estuaries gives way to the Sea-Island system, in which the main-land is flanked by a series of bars or sandbanks, separated from it by tortuous and difficult lagoons. The rivers which empty into this network of channels are comparatively difficult of entrance, and but imperfectly navigable. The isolation of the Sea Islands is enough to make them still more inconvenient situations than any on the main-land for the foundation of a metropolis. Before we have gone far down this system, we have passed the centre where, on mathematical principles, a metropolis should stand.

It’s not just the best harbor on our coast, but it also has the easiest connections to other parts of the country. It’s nearly central to the rest of the coastline without sacrificing too much in other areas. Delaware and Chesapeake Bays provide great anchorages, but the low sandy plains and wet alluvial flats along their shores forced Philadelphia and Baltimore to push their populations far up the main rivers, which made them miss out on many crucial benefits typical of a seaport. With the influence of free ideas, we can expect remarkable growth in the advantages of Chesapeake Bay. Effective agriculture and unrestrained entrepreneurship in Maryland and Virginia will surprise Baltimore with a rise in its population and commerce beyond the best optimistic visions. The full potential of Delaware Bay is still far from being realized. However, Philadelphia and Baltimore will always be at a disadvantage compared to New York, due to their greater distance from open water and the relatively lesser quality of the interior areas they easily connect with. Below Chesapeake Bay, the coastal system of large river estuaries transforms into the Sea-Island system, where the mainland is bordered by a series of bars or sandbanks, separated by winding and challenging lagoons. The rivers that flow into this intricate network of channels are relatively hard to access and not very navigable. The isolation of the Sea Islands makes them even less suitable for establishing a major city than any locations on the mainland. As we travel further down this system, we pass the point where, according to mathematical principles, a metropolis should ideally be located.

Considered with regard to the tributary interior, New York occupies a position no less central than with respect to the coast. It is impossible to study a map of our country without momently increasing surprise at the multiplicity of natural avenues which converge in New York from the richest producing districts of the world. The entire result of the country's labor seems to seek New York by inevitable channels. Products run down to the managing, disbursing, and balancing hand of New York as naturally as the thoughts of a man run down to the hand which must embody them. From the north it takes tribute through the Hudson River. This magnificent water-course, permitting the ascent of the largest ships for a hundred miles, and of river-craft for fifty miles farther, has upon its eastern side a country averaging about thirty miles in width to the Taconic range, consisting chiefly of the richest grazing, grain, and orchard land in the Atlantic States. Above the Highlands, the west side of the river becomes a fertile, though narrower and more broken agricultural tract; and at the head of navigation, the Hudson opens into another valley of exhaustless fertility,—that of the Mohawk,—coming eastward from the centre of the State.[Pg 78]

When looking at the tributary interior, New York holds a position as central as it does along the coast. It's hard to study a map of our country without being continually surprised by the many natural routes that lead to New York from the most productive areas in the world. All of the country's efforts seem to flow into New York through natural channels. Goods move toward the managing, distributing, and balancing force of New York as naturally as a person's thoughts form in their mind. From the north, it receives contributions via the Hudson River. This impressive waterway, allowing the largest ships to travel a hundred miles upstream and smaller vessels for an additional fifty miles, is flanked on its eastern side by a region that averages about thirty miles wide up to the Taconic range, primarily consisting of the richest grazing, grain, and orchard land in the Atlantic States. Above the Highlands, the west side of the river transforms into a fertile, though narrower and more uneven, agricultural area; and at the head of navigation, the Hudson opens into another valley of abundant fertility—the Mohawk Valley—coming eastward from the center of the State.[Pg 78]

Thus, independent of her system of railroads, New York City possesses uninterrupted natural connection with the interior of the State, whence a new system of communications is given off by the Lakes to the extreme west and north of our whole territory.

Thus, regardless of her railroad system, New York City has a continuous natural link to the interior of the State, from which a new communication network extends through the Lakes to the far west and north of our entire territory.

To the northeast, New York extends her relations by the sheltered avenue of Long Island Sound,—alluring through a strait of comparatively smooth water not only the agricultural products which seek export along a double water-front of two hundred miles, but the larger results of that colossal manufacturing system on which is based the prosperity of New England. To a great part of this class of values Long Island Sound stands like a weir emptying into the net of New York.

To the northeast, New York expands its connections through the protected route of Long Island Sound,—attracting not just the agricultural products looking to be exported along a 200-mile double waterfront, but also the bigger outcomes of the massive manufacturing system that supports New England's prosperity. Long Island Sound serves as a channel for much of this value, acting like a weir feeding into New York's network.

The maritime position of New York makes her as easy an entrepôt for Southern as for foreign products; and in any case her share in our Northern national commerce gives her the control of all trade which must pay the North a balance of exchange.

The location of New York makes it an easy hub for both Southern and foreign products; and in any case, its role in our Northern national trade gives it control over all commerce that needs to pay the North a balance.

The Hudson, the Sound, and the line of Southern coasting traffic are the three main radii of supply which meet in New York. Another important district paying its chief subsidy to New York is drained by the Delaware River, and this great avenue is reached with ease from the metropolis by a direct natural route across the Jersey level. Though unavailable to New York as a navigable conduit, it still offers a means of penetrating to the southern counties of the State, and a passage to the Far West, of which New York capital has been prompt to avail itself by the Erie Railroad, with its Atlantic and Great Western continuation to St. Louis. This uniform broad-gauge of twelve hundred miles, which has just been opened by the energy and talents of Messrs. McHenry and Kennard, apparently decides the main channel by which the West is to discharge her riches into New York.—But we are trenching on the subject the capital's artificial advantages.

The Hudson River, the Sound, and the southern coastal traffic routes are the three main supply arteries that converge in New York. Another significant area that contributes heavily to New York is served by the Delaware River, which is easily accessed from the city via a direct natural route across New Jersey. While it’s not a navigable waterway for New York, it still provides a way to reach the southern counties of the state and a path to the West, which New York investors have quickly tapped into through the Erie Railroad and its Atlantic and Great Western extension to St. Louis. This continuous broad-gauge line of twelve hundred miles, recently opened thanks to the efforts and skills of Messrs. McHenry and Kennard, seems to establish the primary route for the West to funnel its wealth into New York.—However, we're getting into the topic of the city’s artificial advantages.

Finally, New York has been prevented only by disgraceful civic mismanagement from becoming long ago the healthiest city in the world. In spite of jobbed contracts for street-cleaning, and various corrupt tamperings with the city water-front, by which the currents are obstructed, and injury is done the sewage as well as the channels of the harbor, New York is now undoubtedly a healthier city than any other approaching it in size. Its natural sanitary advantages must be evident. The crying need of a great city is good drainage. To effect this for New York, the civil engineer has no struggle with his material. He need only avail himself dexterously of the original contour of his ground. Manhattan Island is a low outcrop of gneiss and mica-schist, sloping from an irregular, but practically continuous crest, to the Hudson and East Rivers, with a nearly uniform southerly incline from its precipitous north face on the Haarlem and Spuyten Duyvil to high-water mark at the foot of Whitehall Street. Its natural system of drainage might be roughly illustrated by radii drawn to the circumference of a very eccentric ellipse from its northern focus. Wherever the waste of the entire island may descend, it is met by a seaward tide twice in the twenty-four hours. On the East River side the velocity of this tide in the narrow passages is rather that of a mill-stream than of the entrance to a sound. Though less apparent, owing to its area, the tide and current of the Hudson are practically as irresistible. The two branches of the city-sewage, uniting at the Battery, are deflected a little to the westward by Governor's Island, and thus thrown out into the middle of the bay, where they receive the full force of the tidal impulse, retarded by the Narrows only long enough to disengage and drop their finer silt on the flats between Robin's Reef and the Jersey shore. The depurating process of the New World's grandest community lies ready for use in this natural drainage-system. If there be a standing pool, a festering ditch, a choked gutter, a malarious sink within the scope of the city bills of mortality, there is official crime somewhere. Nature must have been[Pg 79] fraudulently obstructed in the benignest arrangements she ever made for removing the effete material of a vast city's vital processes. In the matter of climate, New York experiences such comparative freedom from sudden changes as belongs to her position in the midst of large masses of water. She enjoys nearly entire immunity from fogs and damp or chilly winds. Her weather is decided, and her population are liable to no one local and predominant class of disease. So far as her hygienic condition depends upon quantity and quality of food, her communications with the interior give her an exceptional guaranty. Despite the poverty which her lower classes share in kind, though to a much less degree, with those of other commercial capitals, there is no metropolis in the world where the general average of comfort and luxury stands higher through all the social grades. It is further to be recollected that health and the chief comforts of life are correlative,—that the squalid family is the unhealthy family, and that, as we import our squalor, so also we import the materials and conditions of our disease. This a priori view is amply sustained by the statistics of our charitable institutions. Dr. Alanson S. Jones, whose position as President of the Board of Surgeons attached to the Metropolitan Police Commission combines with his minute culture in the sciences ministering to his profession to make him a first-class authority upon the sanitary statistics of New York, states that the large majority of deaths, and cases of disease, occur in that city among the recent foreign immigrants,—and that the same source furnishes the vast proportion of inmates of our hospitals, almshouses, asylums, and other institutions of charity; furthermore, that two thirds of all the deaths in New York City occur among children,—a class to which metropolitan conditions are decidedly unfavorable; and that, while the seven hundred thousand inhabitants of Philadelphia are distributed over an area of one hundred and thirty square miles, the one million inhabitants of New York are included within the limit of thirty-five square miles, yet the excess of proportionate mortality in the latter city by no means corresponds to its density of settlement. It is safe to affirm, that, taking all the elements into calculation, there is no city in the civilized world with an equal population and an equal sanitary rank.

Finally, New York has only been held back from becoming the healthiest city in the world due to terrible civic mismanagement. Despite the rigged contracts for street cleaning and various corrupt practices affecting the waterfront that obstruct the currents and harm the sewage and harbor channels, New York is undoubtedly healthier than any other city of similar size. Its natural sanitary advantages are clear. The urgent need of a great city is proper drainage. To achieve this for New York, civil engineers face no challenges with the materials; they simply need to work skillfully with the original shape of the land. Manhattan Island is a low outcrop of gneiss and mica-schist, sloping from an uneven but basically continuous ridge down to the Hudson and East Rivers, with a nearly consistent downward slope from its steep northern face at Harlem and Spuyten Duyvil to high water mark at the foot of Whitehall Street. Its natural drainage system can be roughly illustrated by radii drawn from its northern focus to the perimeter of a very irregular ellipse. Wherever waste from the entire island flows, it is met by a seawater tide twice a day. On the East River side, the tide flows with the speed of a mill stream rather than like that of a sound entrance. Though less obvious due to its wider area, the tide and current of the Hudson are almost as powerful. The two branches of the city's sewage merge at the Battery and are slightly redirected westward by Governor's Island, spilling into the center of the bay, where they channel the full force of the tide, held up by the Narrows just long enough to drop their finer silt on the flats between Robin's Reef and the Jersey shore. The natural drainage system of this great New World community is ready for use. If there is a stagnant pool, a filthy ditch, a blocked gutter, or a breeding ground for disease within the city's mortality scope, it indicates official wrongdoing. Nature has been fraudulently obstructed in her most beneficial arrangements for disposing of the waste created by a large city's vital activities. Regarding climate, New York enjoys relative stability with few sudden changes due to its location among large bodies of water. It has almost complete immunity to fog and cool, damp winds. Its weather is consistent, and its population isn't particularly affected by any one dominant local disease. As far as the health of its population depends on the availability and quality of food, its connections to the interior provide exceptional guarantees. Despite the poverty experienced by its lower classes, which they share, to a much lesser extent, with those in other commercial capitals, there is no other major city in the world where the general standard of comfort and luxury is higher across all social classes. It’s also important to note that health and the main comforts of life are interconnected—that a poor family is an unhealthy family, and just as we import our poverty, we also import the factors and conditions that contribute to our illnesses. This perspective is thoroughly supported by the statistics from our charitable organizations. Dr. Alanson S. Jones, who serves as President of the Board of Surgeons with the Metropolitan Police Commission and has an extensive background in the sciences relevant to his field, is a leading authority on the sanitary statistics of New York. He notes that the large majority of deaths and disease cases in the city occur among recent foreign immigrants, who also make up the vast majority of those in our hospitals, poorhouses, asylums, and other charitable institutions. Furthermore, two-thirds of all deaths in New York City occur among children—a group that faces particularly unfavorable metropolitan conditions. While the 700,000 residents of Philadelphia are spread out over an area of 130 square miles, the one million residents of New York are crowded into just 35 square miles, yet the increased mortality rate in the latter does not align with its population density. It’s safe to say that when considering all factors, there is no city in the civilized world with a similar population and equal sanitary status.

Hydrographically speaking, either Liverpool or Bristol surpasses London in its claims to be the British metropolis. But as England's chief commerce flows from the eastward, to accommodate it she must select for her metropolis the shores of the most accessible, capacious, and sheltered water on that side of the island. The result is London,—a city backed by an almost imperceptible fraction of the vast interior which pays tribute to New York,—having a harbor of far less capacity than New York, and without any of its far-reaching ramifications,—provided with a totally inadequate drainage-system, operating by a river which New-Yorkers would shudder to accept for the purposes of a single ward,—and supporting a population of three million souls upon her brokerage in managing the world's commerce. New York has every physical advantage over her in site, together with an agricultural constituency of which she can never dream, and every opportunity for eventually surpassing her as a depot of domestic manufactures. London can never add arable acres to her suite, while only the destruction of the American people can prevent us from building ten up-country mills to every one which manufactures for her market. She has merely the start of us in time; she has advanced rapidly during the last fifty years, but New York has even more rapidly diminished the gap. No wonder that British capitalists will sacrifice much to see us perish,—for it is pleasanter to receive than to pay balance of exchange, even in the persons of one's prospective great-grandchildren.

Hydrographically speaking, either Liverpool or Bristol is better suited than London to be the British metropolis. But since England's main trade comes from the east, she has to choose a location for her metropolis on the side of the island with the most accessible, spacious, and sheltered waters. This leads to London—a city with only a tiny part of the large interior that contributes to New York—having a harbor that's much smaller than New York's and lacking its extensive connections. London also has an insufficient drainage system that relies on a river New Yorkers would find unacceptable for even a single neighborhood, all while supporting a population of three million people dealing with global commerce. New York has every physical advantage over London in terms of location, plus an agricultural base that London can only dream of, along with every chance to eventually outdo London as a hub for domestic manufacturing. London can't gain more arable land, while only the downfall of the American people could stop us from building ten mills in the countryside for every one that makes products for her market. She’s just had a head start, and while she’s progressed quickly in the last fifty years, New York has even faster narrowed that gap. It's no surprise that British investors would do a lot to see us fail—after all, it’s nicer to collect than to pay the exchange balance, even if it impacts generations yet to come.

Turning to the second great power of the Old World, we may assert that there is not a harbor on the entire French[Pg 80] coast of capacity or convenience proportionate to the demands of a national emporium. Though the site of Paris was chosen by a nation in no sense commercial, and the constitutional prejudices of the people are of that semi-barbarous kind which affect at the same time pleasure and a contempt of the enterprises which pay for it, there has been a decided anxiety among the foremost Frenchmen since the time of Colbert to see France occupying an influential position among the national fortune-hunters of the world. Napoleon III. shares this solicitude to an extent which his uncle's hatred of England would never permit him to confess, though he felt it deeply. The millions which the present Emperor has spent on Cherbourg afford a mere titillation to his ambitious spirit. Their result is a handsome parade-place,—a pretty stone toy,—an unpickable lock to an inclosure nobody wants to enter,—a navy-yard for the creation of an armament which has no commerce to protect. No wonder that the discontented despot seeks to eke out the quality of his ports by their plenteous quantity,—seizing Algiers,—looking wistfully at the Red Sea,—overjoyed at any bargain which would get him Nice,—striking madly out for empire in Cochin China, Siam, and the Pacific islands,—playing Shylock to Mexico on Jecker's forged bond, that his own inconvenient vessels might have an American port to trim their yards in. Meanwhile, to forget the utter unfitness of Paris for the capital of any imaginary Commercial France, he plays ship with Eugénie on the gentle Seine, or amuses himself with the marine romance of the Parisian civic escutcheon.

Turning to the second major power of the Old World, we can say that there isn't a harbor along the entire French[Pg 80] coast that is capable or convenient enough to meet the needs of a national trading hub. Although the location of Paris was chosen by a nation that wasn’t particularly commercial, and the people have a somewhat primitive mindset that simultaneously values leisure while looking down on the enterprises that fund it, there has been a clear desire among leading Frenchmen since Colbert's time to see France play an influential role among the world's fortune-seekers. Napoleon III shares this concern to a degree that his uncle's animosity toward England would never allow him to admit, even though he feels it deeply. The millions that the current Emperor has poured into Cherbourg provide only a slight thrill to his ambitious nature. What they produce is a grand display area—a nice stone decoration—a lock that can't be picked but leads to an enclosure no one wants to enter—a naval yard for building an armada that has no trade to defend. It’s no wonder that the frustrated ruler tries to enhance the quality of his ports by increasing their quantity—taking over Algiers—eyeing the Red Sea with interest—delighted by any deal that would get him Nice—recklessly pursuing empire in Cochin China, Siam, and the Pacific islands—acting like a loan shark to Mexico over Jecker's forged bond, just to have an American port where his troublesome ships can dock. Meanwhile, to distract himself from the complete unsuitability of Paris as the capital of any imagined Commercial France, he enjoys leisurely boat rides with Eugénie on the calm Seine or entertains himself with the maritime fantasies of the Parisian city emblem.

No one will think for an instant of comparing Paris with New York in respect to natural advantages. The capitals of the other Continental nations are still less susceptible of being brought into the competition. The vast cities of China are possible only in the lowest condition of individual liberty,—class servitude, sumptuary and travel restrictions, together with all the other complicated enginery of an artificial barbarism, being the only substitute for natural cohesion in a community whose immense mass can procure nothing but the rudest necessaries of life from the area within which it is confined.

No one will even think for a moment about comparing Paris to New York when it comes to natural advantages. The capitals of other European countries are even less likely to compete. The huge cities in China only exist in an environment with minimal individual freedom—where class oppression, restrictions on spending and travel, and all the other complexities of a forced barbarism are the only alternatives to the natural bonds in a society that can only obtain the most basic necessities of life from the limited area it occupies.

A priori, therefore, we might expect that the metropolis of America would arise on New York Island, and in process of time become one of the greatest capitals of the world.

A priori, therefore, we might expect that the capital of America would emerge on New York Island and eventually become one of the greatest capitals in the world.

The natural advantages which allured New York's first population have been steadily developed and reinforced by artificial ones. For the ships of the world she has built about her water-front more than three hundred piers and bulkheads. Allowing berth-room for four ships in each bulkhead, and for one at the end of each pier, (decidedly an under-estimate, considering the extent of some of these structures,)—the island water-front already offers accommodation for the simultaneous landing of eight hundred first-class foreign cargoes. The docks of Brooklyn, Jersey City, and Hoboken may accommodate at least as many more. Something like a quarter of all New York imports go in the first instance to the bonded warehouse; and this part, not being wanted for immediate consumption within the metropolis proper, quite as conveniently occupies the Long Island or Jersey warehouses as those on the New York shore. The warehouses properly belonging to New York commerce—containing her property and living on her business—received during 1861 imports to the value of $41,811,664; during 1862, $46,939,451; and during 1863, $61,350,432. During the year 1861, the total imports of New York amounted to $161,684,499,—paying an aggregate of duties of $21,714,981. During the year 1862, the imports amounted to $172,486,453, and the duties to $52,254,318. During 1863, the imports reached a value of $184,016,350, the duties on which amounted to $58,885,853. For the same years the exports amounted respectively to $142,903,689, $216,416,070, and $219,256,203,—the rapid increase between 1861 and 1862 being no doubt partly stimulated[Pg 81] by the disappearance of specie from circulation under the pressure of our unparalleled war-expenses, and the consequent necessity of substituting in foreign markets our home products for the ordinary basis of exchange. In 1861, 965 vessels entered New York from foreign ports, and 966 cleared for foreign ports. In 1862, the former class numbered 5,406, and the latter 5,014. In 1863, they were respectively 4,983 and 4,466. These statistics, from which the immense wharfage and warehouse accommodation of New York may be inferred, are exhibited to better advantage in the following tabular statement, kindly furnished by Mr. Ogden, First Auditor of the New York Custom-House.

The natural benefits that attracted New York's first residents have been consistently enhanced by man-made developments. For the ships of the world, over three hundred piers and bulkheads have been constructed along her waterfront. With space for four ships in each bulkhead and one at the end of each pier (which is likely an underestimate given the size of some of these structures), the island's waterfront already provides space for the simultaneous arrival of eight hundred first-class foreign cargoes. The docks in Brooklyn, Jersey City, and Hoboken can accommodate at least as many more. About a quarter of all imports to New York initially go into bonded warehouses, and since this cargo is not needed for immediate use in the city, it can just as easily occupy warehouses in Long Island or Jersey as those along the New York shore. The warehouses that serve New York commerce—housing her goods and relying on her business—received imports worth $41,811,664 in 1861; $46,939,451 in 1862; and $61,350,432 in 1863. In 1861, New York's total imports reached $161,684,499, with total duties amounting to $21,714,981. In 1862, imports totaled $172,486,453, and duties were $52,254,318. By 1863, imports had risen to $184,016,350, with duties of $58,885,853. For those same years, exports were $142,903,689, $216,416,070, and $219,256,203, with the rapid growth between 1861 and 1862 likely driven partly by the decrease of coins in circulation due to the demands of our unprecedented war expenses, making it necessary to exchange our local products in foreign markets instead of relying on the usual currency. In 1861, 965 vessels arrived in New York from foreign ports, and 966 departed for foreign ports. In 1862, arrivals numbered 5,406, and departures 5,014. In 1863, those numbers were 4,983 and 4,466, respectively. These statistics, which highlight New York's vast wharf and warehouse capacity, are presented more clearly in the following table provided by Mr. Ogden, First Auditor of the New York Custom-House.

Statistics of the Port of New York.

   1861. 1862. 1863.
   $ $ $
1Total value of Exports142,903,689216,416,070219,256,203
2Total value of Imports161,684,499172,486,453184,016,350
3Value of Goods warehoused during the entire year 41,811,664 46,939,451 61,350,432
4Amount of Drawback allowed during the entire year 57,326.55 275,953.92 414,041.44
5Total amount of Duties paid during year 21,714,981.10 52,254,317.92 58,885,853.42
6No. of Vessels entered from Foreign Ports during year 965 5,406 4,983
7No. of Vessels cleared to foreign Ports during year 966 5,014 4,666

Besides the various berths or anchorages and the warehouses of New York, commerce is still further waited on in our metropolis by one of the most perfect systems of pilot-boat, steam-tug, and lighter service which have ever been devised for a harbor. No vessel can bring so poor a foreign cargo to New York as not to justify the expense of a pilot to keep its insurance valid, a tug to carry it to its moorings, and a lighter to discharge it, if the harbor be crowded or time press. Indeed, the first two items are matters of course; and not one of them costs enough to be called a luxury.

In addition to the various docks and warehouses in New York, the city is supported by one of the best systems of pilot boats, tugboats, and barges ever designed for a harbor. No ship can bring a low-value foreign cargo to New York without justifying the cost of a pilot to keep its insurance valid, a tug to tow it to its spot, and a lighter to unload it, especially if the harbor is busy or time is tight. In fact, the first two services are standard practice, and none of them is expensive enough to be considered a luxury.

The American river-steamboat—the palatial American steamboat, as distinguished from the dingy, clumsy English steamer—is another of the means by which Art has supplemented New York's gifts of Nature. This magnificent triumph of sculpturesque beauty, wedded to the highest grade of mechanical skill, must be from two hundred and fifty to four hundred feet long,—must accommodate from five hundred to two thousand passengers,—must run its mile in three minutes,—must be as rococo in its upholsterings as a bedchamber of Versailles,—must gratify every sense, consult every taste, and meet every convenience. Such a boat as this runs daily to every principal city on the Sound or the Hudson, to Albany, to Boston, to Philadelphia. A more venturous class of coasting steamers in peaceful times are constantly leaving for Baltimore, Wilmington, Charleston, Savannah, Key West, Mobile, New Orleans, and Galveston. The immense commerce of the Erie Canal, with all its sources and tributaries, is practically transacted by New York City. Nearly everything intended for export, plus New York's purchases for her own consumption, is forwarded from the Erie Canal terminus in a series of tows, each of these being a rope-bound fleet, averaging perhaps fifty canal-boats and barges, propelled by a powerful steamer intercalated near the centre. The traveller new to Hudson River scenery will be startled, any summer day on which he may choose to take a steamboat trip to Albany, by the apparition, at distances varying from one to three miles all the way, of floating islands, settled by a large commercial population, who like their dinner off the top of a hogshead, and follow the laundry business to such an extent that they quite effloresce with wet shirts, and are seen through a lattice of clothes-lines. Let him know that these floating islands are but little drops of vital blood from the great heart of the West, coming down the nation's main artery[Pg 82] to nurse some small tissue of the metropolis; that these are "Hudson River tows"; and that, novel as that phenomenon may appear to him, every other fresh traveller has been equally startled by it since March, and will be startled by it till December. Another ministry to New York is performed by the night-tows, consisting of a few cattle, produce, and passenger barges attached to a steamer, made up semi-weekly or tri-weekly at every town of any importance on the Hudson and the Sound. We will not include the large fleet of Sound and River sloops, brigs, and schooners in the list of New York's artificial advantages.

The American river steamboat—the grand American steamboat, unlike the grimy, awkward English steamer—is another way that Art has enhanced New York's natural beauty. This impressive achievement of artistic design combined with top-notch engineering must be between two hundred and fifty and four hundred feet long, accommodate five hundred to two thousand passengers, travel a mile in three minutes, have rococo upholstery like a room in Versailles, and satisfy all the senses, tastes, and conveniences. Such a boat operates daily to every major city on the Sound or the Hudson, including Albany, Boston, and Philadelphia. A bolder group of coastal steamers, during peaceful times, regularly departs for Baltimore, Wilmington, Charleston, Savannah, Key West, Mobile, New Orleans, and Galveston. The massive trade of the Erie Canal, along with all its sources and tributaries, is essentially handled by New York City. Almost everything meant for export, plus New York's own purchases, is sent from the Erie Canal terminus in a series of tows, each of which is a rope-bound fleet, averaging about fifty canal boats and barges, powered by a strong steamer located in the middle. Travelers unfamiliar with the Hudson River scenery will be surprised on any summer day they take a steamboat trip to Albany by the sight of floating islands appearing at distances of one to three miles along the way, inhabited by a sizable commercial population that dines from hogsheads and runs a laundry business so extensive that they are draped in wet shirts and visible through a web of clotheslines. They should know that these floating islands are just small drops of life from the great heart of the West, flowing down the nation's main artery to support a small part of the metropolis; these are "Hudson River tows," and while this phenomenon may seem new to him, every fresh traveler has been equally surprised by it since March and will continue to be until December. Another service to New York is provided by the night-tows, which include a few cattle, produce, and passenger barges connected to a steamer, organized semi-weekly or tri-weekly from every important town on the Hudson and the Sound. We will not count the large fleet of Sound and River sloops, brigs, and schooners in New York's list of artificial advantages.

Turning to New York's land communication with the interior, we find the following railroads radiating from the metropolitan centre.

Turning to New York's land connections with the interior, we find the following railroads extending from the city center.

1. A Railroad to Philadelphia.
2. A Railroad to the Pennsylvania Coal Region.
3. A Railroad to Piermont on the Hudson.
4. A Railroad to Bloomfield in New Jersey.
5. A Railroad to Morristown in New Jersey.
6. A Railroad to Hackensack in New Jersey.
7. A Railroad to Buffalo.
8. A Railroad to Albany, running along the Hudson.
9. Another Railroad to Albany, by an interior route.
10. A Railroad to New Haven.
11. A Railroad to the chief eastern port of Long Island.
12. The Delaware and Raritan Road to Philadelphia, connecting with New York by daily transports from pier.
13. The Camden and Amboy Railroad, connecting similarly.
14. The Railroad to Elizabeth, New Jersey.

1. A train line to Philadelphia.
2. A train line to the Pennsylvania coal region.
3. A train line to Piermont on the Hudson.
4. A train line to Bloomfield in New Jersey.
5. A train line to Morristown in New Jersey.
6. A train line to Hackensack in New Jersey.
7. A train line to Buffalo.
8. A train line to Albany, running along the Hudson.
9. Another train line to Albany, via an interior route.
10. A train line to New Haven.
11. A train line to the main eastern port of Long Island.
12. The Delaware and Raritan Railroad to Philadelphia, connecting with New York through daily transports from the pier.
13. The Camden and Amboy Railroad, connecting in the same way.
14. The train line to Elizabeth, New Jersey.

The chief eastern radius throws out ramifications to the principal cities of New England, thus affording liberal choice of routes to Boston, New Bedford, Providence, and Portland, as well as an entrance to New Hampshire and Vermont. To all of these towns, except the more southerly, the Hudson River Road leads as well, connecting besides with railroads in every direction to the northern and western parts of the State, and with the Far West by a number of routes. The main avenue to the Far West is, however, the Atlantic and Great Western Road, with its twelve hundred miles of uniform broad-gauge. Along this line the whole riches of the interior may reasonably be expected to flow eastward as in a trough; for its position is axial, and its connection perfect. All the chief New Jersey railroads open avenues to the richest mineral region of the Atlantic States,—to the Far South and the Far West of the country. Two or three may be styled commuters' roads, running chiefly for the accommodation of city business-men with suburban residences. The Long Island Road is a road without important branches; but the majority of all the roads subsidiary to New York are avenues to some broad and typical tract of the interior.

The main eastern route branches out to the key cities of New England, providing plenty of options for traveling to Boston, New Bedford, Providence, and Portland, as well as access to New Hampshire and Vermont. For all these towns, except for the more southern ones, the Hudson River Road also connects, linking with railroads in every direction to the northern and western parts of the state, and to the Far West through various routes. However, the primary route to the Far West is the Atlantic and Great Western Road, featuring twelve hundred miles of consistent broad-gauge tracks. Along this line, it's expected that the wealth of the interior will flow eastward like in a trough; its position is central, and its connections are excellent. All the major New Jersey railroads provide routes to the richest mineral areas of the Atlantic States, as well as to the Far South and the Far West of the country. A couple of these can be classified as commuter lines, mainly serving city workers with suburban homes. The Long Island Road doesn't have significant branches, but most of the railroads connected to New York serve as routes to some broad and representative areas of the interior.

Let us turn to consider how New York has provided for the people as well as the goods that enter her precincts by all the ways we have rehearsed. She draws them up Broadway in twenty thousand horse-vehicles per day, on an average, and from that magnificent avenue, crowded for nearly five miles with elegant commercial structures, over two hundred miles more of paved street, in all directions. She lights them at night with eight hundred miles of gas-pipe; she washes them and slakes their thirst from two hundred and ninety-one miles of Croton main; she has constructed for their drainage one hundred and seventy-six miles of sewer. She victimizes them with nearly two thousand licensed hackmen; she licenses twenty-two hundred car- and omnibus-drivers to carry them over twenty-nine different stage-routes and ten horse-railroads, in six hundred and seventy-one omnibuses and nearly as many cars, connecting intimately with every part of the city, and averaging ten up-and-down trips per day. She connects them with the adjoining cities of the main-land and with Staten and Long Island by twenty ferries, running, on the average, one boat each way every ten minutes during the twenty-four hours. She offers for her guests' luxurious accommodation at least a score of hotels, where good living is made as much the subject of high art as in the Hôtel du Louvre, besides minor houses of rest and entertainment, to the number of more than five thousand. She attends to their religion in about four hundred places of public worship.[Pg 83] She gives them breathing-room in a dozen civic parks, the largest of which both Nature and Art destine to be the noblest popular pleasure-ground of the civilized world, as it is the amplest of all save the Bois de Boulogne. Central Park covers an area of 843 acres, and, though only in the fifth year of its existence, already contains twelve miles of beautifully planned and scientifically constructed carriage-road, seven miles of similar bridle-path, four sub-ways for the passage of trade-vehicles across the Park, with an aggregate length of two miles, and twenty-one miles of walk. As an item of city property, Central Park is at present valued at six million dollars; but this, of course, is quite a nominal and unstable valuation. The worth of the Park to New York property in general is altogether beyond calculation.

Let’s take a look at how New York caters to both its people and the goods that come into the city through all the ways we’ve discussed. Every day, an average of twenty thousand horse-drawn vehicles travel up Broadway, which is lined for nearly five miles with impressive commercial buildings, and from there, there are over two hundred miles of paved streets in every direction. At night, she lights the streets with eight hundred miles of gas piping; she cleans them and provides drinkable water from two hundred and ninety-one miles of Croton mains; and she has built one hundred and seventy-six miles of sewers for drainage. The city is also busy with nearly two thousand licensed taxi drivers; she licenses two thousand two hundred drivers for cars and buses to transport people across twenty-nine different routes and ten horse-drawn railways, using six hundred seventy-one omnibuses and nearly as many cars, all connecting closely with every part of the city and making an average of ten round trips each day. She links the city to nearby mainland cities, Staten Island, and Long Island through twenty ferries, which run about one boat every ten minutes, twenty-four hours a day. For those visiting, she offers luxurious accommodations at at least twenty top-notch hotels where fine dining is treated as an art form, like in the Hôtel du Louvre, along with over five thousand smaller places to rest and enjoy entertainment. The city also supports religion with around four hundred places of worship. She provides green spaces in a dozen civic parks, the largest of which is destined by both Nature and Art to be the most magnificent public recreational area in the civilized world, except for the Bois de Boulogne. Central Park spans 843 acres, and even though it's only been around for five years, it already features twelve miles of beautifully designed and well-constructed carriage roads, seven miles of bridle paths, four underpasses for trade vehicles across the park totaling two miles, and twenty-one miles of walking paths. As city property, Central Park is currently valued at six million dollars, but that’s a fairly nominal and unstable estimate. Its true value to New York's property overall is immeasurable.[Pg 83]

New York feeds her people with about two million slaughter-animals per annum. How these are classified, and what periodical changes their supply undergoes, may be conveniently seen by the following tabular view of the New York butchers' receiving-yards during the twelve months of the year 1863. I am indebted for it to the experience and courtesy of Mr. Solon Robinson, agricultural editor of the "New York Tribune."

New York provides its residents with around two million slaughtered animals each year. The classification and periodic changes in their supply can be clearly observed in the following table of the New York butchers' receiving yards for the twelve months of 1863. I owe this information to the insights and kindness of Mr. Solon Robinson, the agricultural editor of the "New York Tribune."

Receipts of Butchers' Animals in New York during 1863.

Month. Beeves. Cows. Calves. Sheep. Swine.
Jan. 16,349 393 1,318 25,352 138,413
Feb. 19,930 474 1,207 24,877 98,099
March 22,187 843 2,594 29,645 79,320
April 18,921 636 3,182 18,311 56,516
May 16,739 440 3,510 20,338 39,305
June 23,785 718 5,516 44,808 56,612
July 20,224 396 2,993 41,614 40,716
August 20,347 496 3,040 49,900 36,725
Sept. 30,847 524 3,654 79,078 68,646
Oct. 24,397 475 3,283 64,144 112,265
Nov. 23,991 557 3,378 61,082 183,359
Dec. 26,374 518 2,034 60,167 191,641
Total of each kind, 264,091 6,470 35,709 519,3161,101,617
Total of all kinds,1,927,203.

Of the total number of beeves which came into the New York market in 1863, those whose origin could be ascertained were furnished from their several States in the following proportions:—

Of the total number of cattle that arrived in the New York market in 1863, the ones whose origins could be determined came from their respective states in the following proportions:—

Illinoiscontributed118,692
New York"28,985
Ohio"19,369
Indiana"14,232
Michigan"9,074
Kentucky"6,782

Averaging the weight of the cattle which came to New York market in 1863 at the moderate estimate of 700 lbs., the metropolitan supply of beef for that year amounted to 189,392,700 lbs. This, at the average price of nine and a quarter cents per pound, was worth $17,518,825. Proportionably with these estimates, the average weekly expenditure by butchers at the New York yards during the year 1863 was $328,865.

Averaging the weight of the cattle that came to the New York market in 1863 at a reasonable estimate of 700 lbs., the city’s beef supply for that year totaled 189,392,700 lbs. This, at an average price of nine and a quarter cents per pound, was valued at $17,518,825. In line with these estimates, the average weekly spending by butchers at the New York yards during 1863 was $328,865.

It is an astonishing, but indubitable fact, that, while the population of New York has increased sixty-six per cent during the last decade, the consumption of beef has in the same time increased sixty-five per cent. This increment might be ascribed to the great advance of late years in the price of pork,—that traditional main stay of the poor man's housekeeping,—were it not that the importation of swine has increased almost as surprisingly. We are therefore obliged to acknowledge that during a period when the chief growth of our population was due to emigration from the lowest ranks of foreign nationalities, during three years of a devastating war, and inclusive of the great financial crisis of 1857, the increase in consumption of the most costly and healthful article of animal food lacked but one per cent of the increase of the population. These statistics bear eloquent witness to the rapid diffusion of luxury among the New York people.

It’s an astonishing but undeniable fact that, while New York’s population has increased by sixty-six percent over the last decade, beef consumption has gone up by sixty-five percent in the same time period. This rise could be attributed to the significant increase in pork prices—a traditional staple for the impoverished—if not for the fact that the importation of pigs has also grown surprisingly. Therefore, we must admit that during a time when the main growth of our population came from immigrants from the lower classes of foreign nationalities, during three years of devastating war, and including the major financial crisis of 1857, the increase in consumption of the most expensive and nutritious animal food was just one percent short of the population increase. These statistics clearly demonstrate the rapid spread of luxury among the people of New York.

From the table of classification by States we may draw another interesting inference. It will be seen that by far the largest proportion of the bullocks came into the New York market from the most remote of the Western States contributing. In other words, New York City has so perfected her connection with all the sources of supply, that distance has become an unimportant element[Pg 84] in her calculations of expense; and she can make all the best grazing land of the country tributary to her market, without regard to the question whether it be one or twelve hundred miles off.

From the state classification table, we can draw another interesting conclusion. It shows that the largest number of cattle came into the New York market from the farthest Western States contributing. In other words, New York City has refined its connections with all sources of supply to the point that distance is no longer a significant factor in its expense calculations; it can tap into the best grazing land in the country, regardless of whether it's one mile or twelve hundred miles away.[Pg 84]

The foregoing butchers' estimates are as exact as our present means of information can make them. Large numbers of uncounted sheep are consumed within the city limits, and the unreported calves are many more than come to light in statistics. Besides these main staples of the market which have been mentioned, there is consumed in New York an incalculable quantity of game and poultry, preserved meats and fish, cheese, butter, and eggs.

The estimates from the butchers above are as accurate as our current information allows. A lot of uncounted sheep are consumed within the city limits, and the number of unreported calves is much greater than what statistics reveal. In addition to these main market staples that have been mentioned, New York consumes an immense amount of game and poultry, preserved meats and fish, cheese, butter, and eggs.

Mr. James Boughton, clerk of the New York Produce Exchange, has been good enough to furnish me with a tabular statement of the city's receipts of produce for the year ending April 30, 1864. Such portions of it as may show the amount of staples, exclusive of fresh meat, required for the regular supply of the New York market, are presented in the opposite column.

Mr. James Boughton, clerk of the New York Produce Exchange, has kindly provided me with a table showing the city’s produce receipts for the year ending April 30, 1864. The parts that indicate the amount of staples, excluding fresh meat, needed for the regular supply of the New York market are shown in the column to the right.

A less important, but still very interesting, class of products entered New York during the same period, in the following amounts:—

A less significant, but still very intriguing, category of products arrived in New York during the same timeframe, in the following quantities:—

Cotton fabric. Seed. Ashes.Whiskey. Oil Cake.
Bales. Bush. Pkgs. Bbls.Sacks.
18,193 7,343 1,401 21,838 2,329
16,299 3,196 1,657 26,925 14,040
13,080 901 1,175 19,627 20,120
11,043 892 1,551 18,083 19,583
12,874 2,082 884 15,781 4,810
19,332 1,189 790 17,656 17,500
26,902 2,318 1,280 20,098 10,441
24,870 8,193 1,393 39,594 4,973
22,010 8,441 1,163 32,346 2,676
28,242 24,216 1,498 34,475 2,115
39,302 31,765 1,457 35,575 2,963
33,538 5,686 1,044 22,873 4,536
265,685 96,222 15,293 304,871 106,356

New York, during the same period, exported,—

New York, during the same time, exported,—

OfFlour2,571,744 bbls.
"Wheat15,842,836 bushels.
"Corn5,576,836      "
"Cured Beef113,061 pkgs.
"   "    Pork189,757 bbls.
"Cotton27,561 bales.





Month. Flour. Corn Meal. Corn Meal.Wheat. Corn.
  Bbls. Bbls. Bags.Bush. Bush.
1863.—May 454,363 10,331 18,614 1,789,952 1,914,490
June 636,501 19,283 7,989 2,853,755 2,262,825
July 451,004 9,995 10,480 2,409,184 3,049,126
August 298,097 9,875 9,226 1,989,839 2,343,899
September 319,923 10,481 4,715 1,132,588 2,196,157
October 451,762 8,673 13,020 3,052,968 1,265,793
November 530,096 8,883 22,835 3,164,750 295,398
December 429,641 16,301 45,627 1,396,608 135,907
1864.—January 266,240 7,987 43,990 10,244 145,557
February 233,822 12,489 47,137 45,283 108,751
March 190,785 14,135 40,510 108,407 259,547
April 218,181 10,889 27,097 166,506 120,272
Total 4,480,415 145,272 291,190 18,119,993 14,098,262





Months. Oats. Rye.Malt. Barley. Beef.
  Bush. Bush. Bush.Bush. Bbls.
1863.—May 808,233 28,034 24,034 4,672 9,428
June 1,442,979 23,038 22,508 1,643 2,386
July 849,831 52,759 16,710 none. 1,285
August 1,097,223 68,035 55,453 .... 892
September 307,025 9,721 47,048 7,941 718
October 1,319,985 41,912 13,461 753,893 7,420
November 2,189,719 36,731 44,322 441,479 68,391
December 1,882,344 45,727 59,494 275,568 74,031
1864.—January 305,690 6,532 42,608 6,972 22,988
February 209,080 3,554 63,064 5,105 6,358
March 258,685 5,308 69,578 18,386 4,319
April 238,344 6,373 44,383 41,914 4,654
Total 10,909,238 328,619 502,693 1,557,573 203,270





Months. Pork. Cut Meats. Lard. Dressed Hogs.
  Bbls. Pkgs.100 lbs. No.
1863.—May 119,302 38,587 149,966 ....
June 112,343 21,401 75,966 ....
July 10,155 6,633 15,396 ....
August 6,879 2,870 3,784 ....
September 7,115 3,967 5,233 ....
October 6,921 4,501 35,128 881
November 6,916 11,066 35,997 755
December 21,864 18,843 31,775 21,208
1864.—January 39,364 34,469 25,145 48,276
February 32,144 42,593 43,245 59,894
March 33,687 92,710 83,122 4,600
April 12,346 49,399 90,496 67
Total 409,036 327,129 594,853 135,481

Deducting from the total supply of each of these six staples such amounts as were exported during the year, we find a remainder, for annual metropolitan consumption, amounting, in the case of

Deducting from the total supply of each of these six staples the amounts that were exported during the year, we find a remainder for annual metropolitan consumption, which amounts, in the case of

Flourto1,908,671 bbls.
Wheat"2,276,257 bushels.
Corn"8,540,490     "
Cured Beef"89,209 pkgs.
   "   Pork"209,279 bbls.
Cotton"238,124 bales.

We have no room for the details—which would embarrass us, if we should attempt a statement—of the cost of clothing the New York people. We will merely remark, in passing, that one of the largest retail stores in the New York dry-goods trade sells at its counters ten million dollars' worth of fabrics per annum, and that another concern in the wholesale branch of the same trade does a yearly business of between thirty and forty millions. As for tailors' shops, New York is their fairy-land,—many eminent examples among them resembling, in cost, size, and elegance, rather a European palace than a republican place of traffic.

We don’t have space for the details—which would be embarrassing to share—about the cost of clothing the people of New York. We’ll just note, in passing, that one of the largest retail stores in the New York dry-goods market sells about ten million dollars’ worth of fabrics each year, and another company in the wholesale side of the same trade has an annual business of between thirty and forty million. As for tailors’ shops, New York is like their paradise—many notable examples among them resemble a European palace in terms of cost, size, and elegance, rather than a bustling democratic marketplace.

The most comprehensive generalization by which we may hope to arrive at an idea of the business of New York is that which includes in tabular form the statistics of the chief institutions which employ and insure property.

The best overall summary to understand the nature of business in New York is the one that presents, in table format, the statistics of the main institutions that employ and insure property.

On the 24th of September, 1864, sixty-three banks made a quarterly statement of their condition, under the general banking law of the State. These banks are at present the only ones in New York whose condition can be definitely ascertained, and their reported capital amounts to $69,219,763. The national banks will go far toward increasing the total metropolitan banking capital to one hundred millions. The largest of the State banks doing business in the city is the Bank of Commerce, (about being reorganized on the national plan,) with a capital of ten millions; and the smallest possess capital to the amount of two hundred thousand dollars.

On September 24, 1864, sixty-three banks released a quarterly report on their status, as required by the state’s banking laws. Right now, these are the only banks in New York whose situations we can clearly understand, and their total reported capital is $69,219,763. The national banks are expected to significantly boost the overall banking capital in the city to one hundred million. The biggest state bank operating in the city is the Bank of Commerce (which is in the process of reorganizing under national guidelines), with a capital of ten million; on the other hand, the smallest has a capital of two hundred thousand dollars.

Mr. Camp, now at the head of the New York Clearing-House, has been kind enough to furnish the following interesting statistics in regard to the total amount of business transactions managed by the New York banks in connection with the Clearing-House during the two years ending on the 30th of last September. Figures can scarcely be made more eloquent by illustration than they are of themselves, I therefore leave them without other comment than the remark that the weekly exchanges at the Clearing-House during the past year have repeatedly amounted to more than the entire expenses of the United States Government for the same period.

Mr. Camp, now leading the New York Clearing-House, has kindly provided the following interesting statistics about the total business transactions handled by the New York banks in connection with the Clearing-House during the two years ending on September 30th of last year. The figures are so striking that they speak for themselves, so I’ll leave them without further comment, except to note that the weekly exchanges at the Clearing-House over the past year have often exceeded the total expenses of the United States Government for the same time frame.

Clearing-House Transactions.

1862. Exchanges. Balances.
October $ 1,081,243,214.07 $ 54,632,410.57
November 874,966,873.15 47,047,576.93
December 908,135,090.29 44,630,405.43
1863.  
January 1,251,408,362.76 58,792,544.70
February 1,199,249,050.07 51,583,913.88
March 1,313,908,804.14 60,456,505.45
April 1,138,218,267.90 53,539,812.46
May 1,535,484,281.78 70,328,306.25
June 1,252,116,400.20 59,803,975.44
July 1,261,668,342.87 62,387,857.44
August 1,466,803,012.90 53,120,821.99
September 1,584,396,148.47 61,302,352.35
  $14,867,597,848.60 $677,626,482.61
306 Business days.
Average for day, 1862-3.
Exchanges $48,586,921.07
Balances 2,214,415.63
1863. Exchanges. Balances.
October $ 1,900,210,522.77 $ 74,088,419.08
November 1,778,800,987.95 66,895,452.49
December 1,745,436,325.73 60,577,884.19
1864.  
January 1,770,312,694.43 63,689,950.88
February 2,088,170,989.48 65,744,935.13
March 2,753,323,948.53 84,938,940.37
April 2,644,732,826.34 93,363,526.16
May 1,877,653,131.37 76,328,462.88
June 1,902,029,181.42 88,187,658.93
July 1,777,753,537.53 73,343,903.49
August 1,776,018,141.53 69,071,237.16
September 2,082,754,368.84 69,288,834.17
  $24,097,196,655.92 $885,719,204.93
306 Business days.
Average for day, 1863-4.
Exchanges $77,984,455.20
Balances 2,866,405.19
Aggregate Exchanges for Eleven Years     $95,540,602,384.53
        "       Balances      "        "      "   4,678,311,016.79
Total Transactions$101,218,913,401.32

On the 31st day of December, 1863, there were 101 joint-stock companies for the underwriting of fire-risks, with an aggregate capital of $23,632,860; net assets to the amount of $29,269,423; net cash receipts from premiums amounting to $10,181,031; and an average percentage of assets to risks in force equalling 2.995. Besides these 101 joint-stock concerns, there existed at the same date twenty-one mutual fire-insurance companies, with an aggregate balance in their favor of $674,042. The rapidity with which mutual companies have yielded to the compacter and more efficient form of the joint-stock concern will be comprehended when it is known that just twice the number now in being have gone out of existence during the last decade. There are twelve marine insurance companies in the metropolis, with assets amounting to $24,947,559. The life-insurance companies number thirteen, with an aggregate capital of $1,885,000. We may safely set down the property invested in New York insurance companies of all sorts at $51,139,461. Add this sum to the aggregate banking capital above stated, and we have a total of $120,359,224. This vast sum merely represents New York's interest in the management of other people's money. The bank is employed as an engine for operating debt and credit. Its capital is the necessary fuel for running the machine; and that fuel ought certainly not to cost more than a fair interest on the products of the engine. The insurance companies guard the business-man's fortune from surprise, as the banks relieve him from drudgery; they put property and livelihood beyond the reach of accident: in other words, they manage the estates of the community so as to secure them from deterioration, and charge a commission for their stewardship.

On December 31, 1863, there were 101 joint-stock companies for underwriting fire risks, with a total capital of $23,632,860; net assets amounting to $29,269,423; net cash receipts from premiums totaling $10,181,031; and an average percentage of assets to risks in force of 2.995. Besides these 101 joint-stock companies, there were also twenty-one mutual fire-insurance companies at that time, with a total balance of $674,042 in their favor. The quick decline of mutual companies to the more compact and efficient form of joint-stock companies can be understood by noting that twice the current number have gone out of existence in the past decade. There are twelve marine insurance companies in the city, with assets totaling $24,947,559. The life insurance companies number thirteen, with a combined capital of $1,885,000. We can confidently estimate the total property invested in New York’s various insurance companies to be $51,139,461. If we add this amount to the total banking capital mentioned earlier, we arrive at a grand total of $120,359,224. This significant amount only reflects New York's stake in managing other people's money. The bank functions as a tool for managing debt and credit. Its capital serves as the essential fuel for operating the system; and that fuel should certainly not cost more than a reasonable interest on the results produced by the system. The insurance companies protect the business person's wealth from unexpected events, just as the banks free them from tedious tasks; they place property and livelihood out of the reach of accidents: in other words, they oversee the community's assets to safeguard them from decline and charge a fee for their management.

It is a legitimate assumption in this part of the country that the money employed in managing property bears to the property itself an average proportion of about seven per cent. Hence it follows that the above-stated aggregate banking and insurance capital of $120,359,224 must represent and be backed by values to more than fourteen times that amount. In other words, and in round numbers, we may assert that the bank and insurance interests of New York are in relations of commerce and control with at least $1,685,029,136. This measure of metropolitan influence, it must be remembered, is based on the statistics attainable mainly outside of cash sales, and through only two of the metropolitan agencies of commerce.

It’s a reasonable assumption in this area that the money used to manage property is typically around seven percent of the property's value. This means that the total banking and insurance capital of $120,359,224 must be supported by values that are more than fourteen times that amount. In simpler terms, we can say that the banking and insurance sectors of New York are involved in commerce and control over at least $1,685,029,136. It's important to note that this measure of metropolitan influence is mainly based on statistics that come from sources outside of cash sales and through just two of the metropolitan commerce agencies.

I do not know how much I may assist any reader's further comprehension of the energies of the metropolis by stating that it issues fifteen daily newspapers, one hundred and thirty-three weekly or semi-weekly journals, and seventy-four monthly, semi-monthly, or weekly magazines,—that it has ten good and three admirable public libraries,—a dozen large hospitals, exclusive of the military,—thirty benevolent societies, (and we are in that respect far behind London, where every man below an attorney belongs to some "union" or other, that he may have his neighbors' guaranty against the ever-impending British poor-house,)—twenty-one savings-banks,—one theatre where French is spoken, a German theatre, an Italian opera-house, and eleven theatres where they speak English. In a general magazine-article, it is impossible to review the hundreds of studios where our own Art is painting itself into the century with a vigor which has no rival abroad. We can treat neither the æsthetic nor the social life of New York with as delicate a pencil as we would. Our paper has had to deal with broad facts; and upon these we are willing to rest the cause of New York in any contest for metropolitan honors. We believe that New York is destined to be the permanent emporium not only of this country, but of[Pg 87] the entire world,—and likewise the political capital of the nation. Had the White House (or, pray Heaven! some comelier structure) stood on Washington Heights, and the Capitol been erected at Fanwood, there would never have been a Proslavery Rebellion. This is a subject which business-men are coming to ponder pretty seriously.

I’m not sure how much I can help any reader understand the energy of the city by pointing out that it has fifteen daily newspapers, one hundred thirty-three weekly or semi-weekly journals, and seventy-four monthly, semi-monthly, or weekly magazines. It has ten good public libraries and three great ones, a dozen large hospitals (not counting military ones), thirty charitable organizations. In that regard, we’re really behind London, where every person below an attorney is part of some "union" to ensure they have their neighbors' support against the ever-looming British poor-house. There are twenty-one savings banks, one theatre that features French performances, a German theatre, an Italian opera house, and eleven theatres for English shows. In a general magazine article, it’s impossible to capture the hundreds of studios where our local art is evolving with a vibrancy unmatched anywhere else. We can't explore the artistic or social life of New York as intricately as we’d like. Our publication has focused on broad facts, and we're willing to stake New York's claim in any competition for metropolitan recognition. We believe New York is destined to be the permanent hub not just for this country, but for the entire world, and also the political capital of the nation. If the White House (or, hopefully, a more attractive building) had been located on Washington Heights, and the Capitol had been built in Fanwood, there would never have been a Proslavery Rebellion. This is a topic that business people are starting to think about seriously.

After all, New York's essential charm to a New-Yorker cannot express itself in figures, nor, indeed, in any adequate manner. It is the city of his soul. He loves it with a passionate dignity which will not let him swagger like the Cockney or twitter like the Parisian. His love for New York goes frequently unacknowledged even to himself, until a necessary absence of unusual length teaches him how hard it would be to lose the city of his affections forever.

After all, New York's true charm for a New Yorker can't be captured in numbers or any proper way. It's the city that means everything to him. He loves it with a passionate dignity that keeps him from boasting like a Cockney or chirping like a Parisian. Often, he doesn't even admit his love for New York to himself, until a long absence makes him realize just how hard it would be to lose the city he loves forever.

It is a bath of other souls. It will not let a man harden in his own epidermis. He must affect and be affected by multitudinous varieties of temperament, race, character. He avoids grooves, because New York will not tolerate grooviness. He knows that he must be able, on demand, to bowl anywhere over the field of human tastes and sympathies. Professionally he may be a specialist, but in New York his specialty must be only the axis around which are grouped encyclopædic learning, faultless skill, and catholic intuitions. Nobody will waste a Saturday afternoon riding on his hobby-horse. He must be a broad-natured person, or he will be a mere imperceptible line on the general background of obscure citizens. He feels that he is surrounded by people who will help him do his best, yes, who will make him do it, or drive him out to install such as will. If he think of a good thing to do, he knows that the market for all good things is close around him. Whatever surplus of himself he has for communication, that he knows to be absolutely sure of a recipient before the day is done. New York, like Goethe's Olympus, says to every man with capacity and self-faith,—

It’s a mix of different souls. It won’t allow someone to become rigid in their own skin. They have to influence and be influenced by a wide range of temperaments, cultures, and personalities. They steer clear of routines because New York doesn't tolerate them. They understand that they have to be able to navigate the vast landscape of human preferences and connections whenever needed. Professionally, they might be a specialist, but in New York, that specialty must serve as just the foundation for a wealth of knowledge, impeccable skills, and diverse insights. No one is going to spend a Saturday afternoon indulging in just their personal interests. They have to be open-minded, or they’ll blend into the background of ordinary citizens unnoticed. They feel surrounded by people who will push them to excel, yes, who will force them to rise or push them out to find those who will. When they think of a good idea, they know there’s a ready market for all good ideas right around them. Whatever extra they have to share, they know there’s definitely someone out there who will receive it before the day ends. New York, like Goethe's Olympus, calls to every person with talent and confidence—

"Here is everything, you brave ones, to reward you:
"Work, and don't lose hope!"

Moreover, the moral air of New York City is in certain respects the purest air a man can breathe. This may seem a paradox. New York City is not often quoted as an example of purity. To the philosopher her atmosphere is cleaner than that of a country village. As the air of a contracted space may grow poisonous by respiration, while pure air rests over the entire surface of the earth in virtue of being the final solvent to all terrestrial decompositions, so it is possible that a few good, but narrow people may get alone together in the country, and hatch a social organism far more morbid than the metropolitan. In the latter instance, aberrations counterbalance each other, and the body politic, cursed though it be with bad officials, has more vitality in it than could be excited by any conclave of excellent men with one idea, meeting, however, solemnly, to feed it with legislative pap.

Moreover, the moral atmosphere of New York City is, in some ways, the cleanest air a person can breathe. This might sound contradictory. New York City isn’t usually seen as a model of purity. To a philosopher, its atmosphere is clearer than that of a small town. Just as the air in a confined space can become toxic due to breathing, while clean air covers the entire earth as the ultimate solution to all natural breakdowns, it’s also possible for a few good, but narrow-minded people to come together in the countryside and create a social environment that’s more unhealthy than what you’d find in the city. In the city, varied perspectives balance one another out, and even though the political landscape might be plagued by corrupt officials, it has more life in it than any gathering of well-meaning individuals with a single idea who meet to endlessly push their agenda.

While no man can ride into metropolitan success on a hobby-horse, popular dissent will still take no stronger form than a quiet withdrawal and the permission to rock by himself. No amount of eccentricity surprises a New-Yorker, or makes him uncourteous. It is difficult to attract even a crowd of boys on Broadway by an odd figure, face, manner, or costume. This has the result of making New York an asylum for all who love their neighbor as themselves, but would a little rather not have him looking through the key-hole. In New York I share no dreadful secrets with the man next door. I am not in his power any more than if I lived in Philadelphia,—nor so much, for he might get somebody to spy me there. There is no other place but New York where my next-door neighbor never feels the slightest hesitation about cutting me dead, because he knows that on such conditions rests that broad individual liberty which is the glory of the citizen.

While no one can achieve success in the city just by daydreaming, public disagreement usually only shows up as a quiet retreat and allowing someone to be on their own. No amount of weirdness shocks a New Yorker or makes them rude. It’s tough to draw even a group of kids on Broadway with an unusual appearance, face, style, or outfit. This ends up making New York a safe space for people who care for their neighbors as themselves but would prefer not to have them prying into their lives. In New York, I don’t share any terrible secrets with my neighbor. I’m not under their control any more than if I lived in Philadelphia—actually, even less so, since they might find someone to spy on me there. There’s no place like New York where my next-door neighbor wouldn’t think twice about ignoring me, because he knows that this kind of freedom is what gives the citizen true pride.

In fine, if we seek the capital of well-paid labor,—the capital of broad congenialities and infinite resources,—the capital of most widely diffused comfort, luxury, and taste,—the capital which to the eye of the plain businessman[Pg 88] deserves to be the nation's senate-seat,—the capital which, as the man of forecast sees, must eventually be the world's Bourse and market-place,—in any case we turn and find our quest in the city of New York.

In short, if we're looking for the hub of well-paying jobs—the hub of diverse opportunities and endless resources—the hub of widely shared comfort, luxury, and style—the hub that, to the average businessperson[Pg 88], deserves to be the nation's capital—the hub that, as a forward-thinking person realizes, will inevitably become the world's stock exchange and marketplace—in any case, we look to the city of New York.

To-day, she might claim Jersey City, Hoboken, Brooklyn, and all the settled districts facing the island shore, with as good a grace as London includes her multitudinous districts on both sides of the Thames. Were all the population who live by her, and legitimately belong to her, now united with her, as some day they must be by absorption, New York would now contain more than 1,300,000 people. For this union New York need make no effort. The higher organization always controls and incorporates the lower.

Today, she could easily claim Jersey City, Hoboken, Brooklyn, and all the established areas along the island shore, just as London claims its many districts on both sides of the Thames. If all the people who depend on her and rightfully belong to her were united with her now, as they eventually will be through integration, New York would have more than 1,300,000 residents. New York doesn’t need to put in any effort for this union. The larger organization always oversees and incorporates the smaller ones.

The release of New York commerce from the last shackles of the Southern "long-paper" system, combined with the progressive restoration of its moral freedom from the dungeon of Southern political despotism, has left, for the first time since she was born, our metropolitan giantess unhampered. Let us throw away the poor results of our last decade! New York thought she was growing then; but the future has a stature for her which shall lift her up where she can see and summon all the nations.[E]

The liberation of New York’s commerce from the last remnants of the Southern "long-paper" system, along with the gradual restoration of its moral independence from the oppression of Southern political control, has finally allowed our great city to thrive freely. Let’s move on from the disappointing outcomes of the past decade! New York believed it was progressing during that time; however, the future holds a potential for her that will elevate her to a vantage point from which she can view and call upon all the nations.[E]

FOOTNOTES:

[E] In addition to the obligations elsewhere recognised, an acknowledgment is due to the well-known archæolgist and statistician of New York,—Mr. Valentine,—who furnished for the purpose of this article the latest edition of his Manual, in advance of its general publication, and to the great convenience of the writer.

[E] In addition to the obligations recognized elsewhere, I want to acknowledge the renowned archaeologist and statistician from New York, Mr. Valentine, who provided the latest edition of his Manual for this article before its general release, which was a great help to me as the writer.


NEEDLE AND GARDEN.

THE STORY OF A SEAMSTRESS WHO LAID DOWN HER NEEDLE AND BECAME A STRAWBERRY-GIRL.

WRITTEN BY HERSELF.

INTRODUCTION.

I am very sure that nothing was ever farther from my thoughts than the writing of a book. The pages which follow were never intended for publication, but were written as an amusement, sometimes in long winter evenings, when it was pleasanter to be indoors, and sometimes in summer days, when most of the circumstances mentioned in them occurred. I was a long time in writing them, as they were done little by little. There was a point in them at which I stopped entirely. Then I lent the manuscript to several of my acquaintances to read. Some of these kept it only a few days, and I feel quite sure soon tired of it, as it afterwards appeared that they had read very little of it: they must have thought it extremely dull. But these probably borrowed it only out of compliment, and so I was neither surprised nor mortified. The only surprise was, that now and then there was one who did have patience to go over it all, as it was written in a common copy-book, not in a very nice hand, and with a great many erasures and alterations. But when one has a favorite, it is grateful to find even a single admirer for it. So it was with me. I wrote from love of the subject; and when any one was kind enough to give his approval, I felt exceedingly pleased, not because I had a high opinion of the matter myself, but only because I had written it. Then it must[Pg 89] be acknowledged that my small circle of acquaintances comprised more workers than readers. Those who had a taste for reading found their time so occupied by the labor necessary to their support that but little was left to them for indulging in books; and the few who had leisure were probably such indifferent readers as to make the task of going over a blotted manuscript too great for their patience, unless it were more interesting than mine.

I’m pretty sure that writing a book was the last thing on my mind. The pages that follow were never meant for publication; they were just written for fun, sometimes during long winter evenings when it was nicer to stay inside, and other times on summer days when most of the events described actually happened. I took a long time to write them, as I did it little by little. There came a point where I completely stopped. Then I shared the manuscript with a few friends to read. Some of them only held onto it for a few days, and I'm quite certain they got bored with it quickly, as it later turned out they read very little of it; they probably thought it was really dull. They likely borrowed it just out of politeness, so I wasn’t surprised or upset. The only surprise was that now and then, someone did take the time to read all of it, even though it was written in a regular notebook, not in very neat handwriting, and it had a lot of corrections and changes. But when you have a favorite, it's nice to find even one admirer. That’s how I felt. I wrote because I loved the subject, and whenever someone was kind enough to show approval, it made me really happy—not because I thought it was great, but just because I had written it. It must be said that my small group of friends had more workers than readers. Those who enjoyed reading found their time so consumed by work that they hardly had any left for books; and the few who had free time were probably such casual readers that tackling a messy manuscript was too much for their patience, unless it was more interesting than mine.

At last, after a very long time, and a great many strange experiences, the manuscript fell into the hands of one who was an entire stranger to me, but who has since proved himself the dearest friend I ever had. He read it, and said it must be published. But the thought of publication so frightened me that it almost deprived me of sleep. Still, after very long persuasion, I consented, and the whole was written over again, with a great many things added. When it was all ready, he told me I must write a preface. So I was persuaded even to this, though that was a new alarm, and I had scarcely recovered from the first. I have always been retiring,—indeed, quite out of sight; and nothing has reconciled me to this publicity but the knowledge that no one will be able to discover me, unless it be the very few who had patience to read my manuscript. Even they will find it so altered and enlarged as scarcely to remember it.

At last, after a really long time and many strange experiences, the manuscript ended up in the hands of someone completely new to me, but who has since become the best friend I've ever had. He read it and insisted that it should be published. However, the idea of publishing terrified me so much that it nearly kept me awake at night. Still, after a lot of convincing, I agreed, and everything was rewritten with a lot of new additions. When it was all set, he told me I needed to write a preface. So I was persuaded to do that too, even though it was another source of anxiety, and I had barely started to get over the first one. I have always been shy—really quite invisible; and the only thing that has made me okay with this new attention is knowing that no one will be able to find me unless they are among the very few who took the time to read my manuscript. Even they will see it has changed and grown so much that they can hardly recognize it.

Yet there is another consideration which ought to reconcile me to coming forward in a way so contrary to what I had ever contemplated. I think the story of my quiet life may lead others to reflect more seriously on the griefs, the trials, and the hardships to which so many of my sex are constantly subjected. It may lead some of the other sex either to think more of these trials, or to view them in a new and different light from any in which they have heretofore regarded them. They may even think that I have suggested a new remedy for an old evil. I know that many such have labored to remove the wrongs of which poor and friendless women are the victims. But while they have already done much toward that humane end, as much remains to do. I make no studied effort to influence or direct them. The contrast between my first and last experience was so great, that, in rewriting, I added some facts from the experience of others to give force to the recital of my own. My hope is, that humane minds may be gratified by a narrative so uneventful, and that they, fortified by position and means, will be led to do for others, in a new direction, as much as I, comparatively unaided, have been able to do for myself.

Yet there's another reason that should make me feel okay about stepping forward in a way I never imagined. I believe the story of my quiet life might encourage others to think more deeply about the griefs, trials, and hardships that so many women constantly face. It may prompt some men to consider these challenges or see them in a new light compared to how they previously viewed them. They might even think I’ve proposed a new solution to an old problem. I know many have worked hard to address the injustices that poor and isolated women suffer. While they’ve already made significant progress towards that compassionate goal, there’s still much work to be done. I’m not trying to manipulate or guide anyone. The difference between my first and last experiences was so significant that, while rewriting, I included some facts from the experiences of others to strengthen the telling of my own. My hope is that compassionate individuals will find value in a story that’s so uneventful and that, equipped with their position and resources, they will be inspired to help others in a new way, just as I, with limited support, have managed to help myself.

CHAPTER I.

Having always had a great fondness for reading, I have gone through every book to which my very limited circle of acquaintance gave me access. Even this small literary experience was sufficient to impress upon my mind the superior value of personal memoirs. Of all my reading, they most interested me; and I have learned from others that such books have most interested them. Indeed, biography, and personal narrative of all kinds, seem to command a general popularity. Moreover, we like to know from the person himself what he does, how he thinks and feels, what fortunes or vicissitudes he encounters, how he begins his career, and how it ends. All biography gives us most of these particulars, but they are never so vividly recited as by the subject of the narrative himself. Accordingly what was once a kind of diary of the most unimportant events I have transformed into a personal history. I know the transformation will not give them any importance they did not originally possess, but it gives me at least one chance of making my recital interesting.

Having always loved reading, I've gone through every book that my very small circle of friends shared with me. Even this limited literary experience has shown me the greater importance of personal memoirs. Of all the reading I've done, they intrigued me the most; and I've learned from others that these books have intrigued them as well. In fact, biographies and personal narratives of all types seem to have a broad appeal. We want to hear directly from the person about what they do, how they think and feel, what challenges or changes they face, how they start their careers, and how they finish. All biographies provide most of this information, but it's never as vividly told as by the person the story is about. So, what was once a sort of diary of the most trivial events, I have turned into a personal history. I know this transformation won’t give them any importance they didn’t originally have, but it at least gives me a chance to make my story interesting.

All who have any knowledge of the city of Philadelphia will remember that on its southern boundary there is a large district known as the township of Moyamensing. Much of it is now incorporated with the recently enlarged city, but the old name still clings to it.[Pg 90] There are many thousand acres in this district, which stretches from the Delaware to the Schuylkill. The junction of the two rivers at its lower end makes it a peninsula, which has long been known as "The Neck." When the city was founded by William Penn, much of this and the adjoining land was in possession of the Swedes, who came first to Pennsylvania. They had settled on tracts of different sizes, some very large, and some very small, according to their ability to purchase. It was then covered by a dense forest, which required great labor to clear it.

Anyone familiar with the city of Philadelphia will remember that its southern edge has a large area known as the township of Moyamensing. Much of it is now part of the recently expanded city, but the old name still sticks. [Pg 90] There are thousands of acres in this area, which runs from the Delaware to the Schuylkill. The meeting point of the two rivers at its southern tip creates a peninsula, which has long been called "The Neck." When the city was founded by William Penn, a lot of this land, along with the nearby area, was owned by the Swedes, who were the first to settle in Pennsylvania. They had settled on plots of varying sizes, some quite large and some quite small, depending on what they could afford. At that time, it was covered by a thick forest that required significant effort to clear.

My ancestors were among these early Swedes. They were so poor in this world's goods as to be able to purchase only forty acres of this extremely cheap land. Even that was not paid for in money, but in labor. In time they cleared it up, built a small brick house after the quaint fashion of those early days, the material for which was furnished from a superior kind of clay underlying the land all around them, and thenceforward maintained themselves from the products of the soil, then, as now, proverbial for its fruitfulness. It descended to their children, most of whom were equally plodding and unambitious with themselves. All continued the old occupation of looking to the soil for subsistence; and so long as the forty acres were kept together, they lived well. But as descendants multiplied, and one generation succeeded to another, so the little farm became subdivided among numerous heirs, all of whom sold to strangers, except my father, who considered himself happy in being able to secure, as his portion, the quaint old homestead, with its then well-stocked garden, and a lot large enough to make his whole domain an acre and a half.

My ancestors were among these early Swedes. They were so poor that they could only afford to buy forty acres of this extremely cheap land. Even that wasn’t paid for with money, but through hard work. Over time, they cleared the land and built a small brick house in the old-fashioned style of those days, using high-quality clay that was found in the ground around them. From then on, they supported themselves with the land’s produce, which was well-known for being very fertile. It was passed down to their children, most of whom were just as hardworking and unambitious as they were. They all continued the family tradition of relying on the land for their livelihood; as long as the forty acres stayed intact, they lived well. But as the family grew and one generation followed another, the little farm got divided among many heirs, most of whom sold their shares to strangers, except for my father, who was happy to keep the charming old homestead, with its then flourishing garden and a lot large enough to turn his whole property into an acre and a half.

I have many times heard him relate the particulars of this acquisition, and say how lucky it was for all of us that he secured it. The other heirs, who had turned their acres into money, went into trade or speculation and came out poor. With the homestead of the first settler my father seemed to have inherited all his unambitious and plodding character. His whole habit was quiet, domestic, and home-loving. He was content to cultivate his land with the spade, raising many kinds of fruits and vegetables for the family and for market, and working likewise in the fields and gardens of his neighbors; while in winter he employed himself in making nets for the fishermen.

I’ve often heard him talk about how he got this property and how lucky we all were that he did. The other heirs, who sold their land for cash, got into business or risky investments and ended up broke. With the homestead of the first settler, my father seemed to have inherited all his humble and hardworking traits. He was quiet, family-oriented, and loved being at home. He was happy to tend to his land with a shovel, growing a variety of fruits and vegetables for the family and for sale, and also worked in the fields and gardens of his neighbors. In winter, he kept busy making nets for the fishermen.

But much of this work for others was done for gentlemen who had fine old houses, built at least a hundred years ago. The land in Moyamensing is so beautifully level, and is so very rich by nature, that at an early day in the settlement of the country a great many remarkably fine dwellings were built upon it, to which extensive gardens were attached. Father had been in and all over many of these mansions, and was fond of describing their wonders to us. They were finished inside with great expense. Some had curiously carved door-frames and mantels, with parlors wainscoted clear up to the ceiling, and heavy mouldings wherever they could be put in. These old-time mansions were scattered thickly over this beautiful piece of land. Such of them as were built nearest the city have long since been swept away by the extension of streets and long rows of new houses; but all through the remoter portion of the district there are many still left, with their fine gardens filled with the best fruits that modern horticulture has enabled the wealthy to gather around them.

But a lot of this work for others was done for wealthy people who owned beautiful old houses built at least a hundred years ago. The land in Moyamensing is so wonderfully flat and naturally rich that, early on in the settlement of the country, many remarkable homes were built on it, complete with large gardens. My dad had been in and around many of these mansions and loved to share their amazing features with us. They were finished inside with great expense. Some had intricately carved door frames and mantels, with parlors that were wainscoted all the way up to the ceiling and heavy moldings wherever possible. These old mansions were spread out across this beautiful land. Those built closest to the city have long since been replaced by new streets and rows of houses, but throughout the more remote parts of the area, many still remain, with their lovely gardens filled with the best fruits that modern horticulture has allowed the wealthy to cultivate around them.

I remember many of those that have been torn down. One or two of them were famous in Revolutionary history. The owners of such as remained in my father's time were glad to have him take charge of their gardens. He knew how to bud or graft a tree, to trim grapevines, and to raise the best and earliest vegetables. In all that was to be done in a gentleman's garden he was so neat, so successful, so quiet and industrious, that whatever time he had to spare from his own was always in demand, and at the highest wages.

I remember many of the ones that have been taken down. A couple of them were well-known in Revolutionary history. The owners of those that were still around in my father's time were happy to have him take care of their gardens. He knew how to graft trees, trim grapevines, and grow the best and earliest vegetables. In everything he did in a gentleman's garden, he was so tidy, so effective, so calm and hard-working, that any time he had left from his own work was always sought after and paid at the highest rates.

When not otherwise occupied, my mother also worked at the art of net-making. At times she was employed in[Pg 91] making up clothing for what some years ago were popularly called the slop-shops, mostly situated in the lower section of the city. These were shops which kept supplies of ready-made clothing for sailors and other transient people who harbored along the wharves. It was coarse work, and was made up as cheaply as possible. At that time the shipping of the port was much of it congregated in the lower part of the city, not far from our house.

When she wasn't busy with other things, my mom also worked on making nets. Sometimes she was hired in[Pg 91] to create clothing for what used to be called slop shops, mostly located in the lower part of the city. These were stores that stocked ready-made clothes for sailors and other travelers who docked near the wharves. It was rough work and done as cheaply as possible. Back then, a lot of the shipping activity was clustered in the lower part of the city, not far from our home.

When a little girl, I have often gone with my mother when she went on her errands to these shops, doing what I could to help her in carrying her heavy bundles to and fro; and more than once I heard her rudely spoken to by the pert young tailor who received her work, and who examined it as carefully as if the material had been silk or cambric, instead of the coarse fabric which constitutes the staple of such establishments. I thus learned, at a very early age, to know something of the duties of needle-women, as well as of the mortifications and impositions to which their vocation frequently subjects them.

When I was a little girl, I often accompanied my mother on her errands to the shops, doing what I could to help her carry her heavy bundles back and forth. More than once, I heard her being spoken to harshly by the cheeky young tailor who took her work and inspected it as carefully as if it were made of silk or fine cotton, instead of the rough fabric that these shops usually dealt with. This way, I learned at a very young age about the responsibilities of seamstresses, as well as the humiliations and unfair treatment they often face in their profession.

My mother was a beautiful sewer, and I am sure she never turned in a garment that had in any way been slighted. She knew how rude and exacting this class of employers were, and was nice and careful in consequence, so as to be sure of giving satisfaction. But all this care availed nothing, in many cases, to prevent rudeness, and sometimes a refusal to pay the pitiful price she had been promised. Her disposition was too gentle and yielding for her to resent these impositions; she was unable to contend and argue with the rough creatures behind the counter; she therefore submitted in silence, sometimes even in tears. Twice, I can distinctly remember, when these heartless men compelled her to leave her work at less than the low price stipulated, I have seen her tears fall in big drops as she took up the mite thus grudgingly thrown down to her, and leave the shop, leading me by the hand. I could feel, young as I was, the hard nature of this treatment. I heard the rough language, though unable to know how harshly it must have grated on the soft feelings of the best mother that child was ever blessed with.

My mom was a skilled seamstress, and I know she never sent out a garment that wasn’t perfect. She understood how rude and demanding this kind of employer could be, so she was careful and meticulous to make sure they were happy with her work. But despite all her efforts, it often didn’t stop the rudeness, and sometimes they even refused to pay her the meager amount she had been promised. She was too kind and accommodating to stand up to these unfair treatment; she couldn’t argue with the rough people behind the counter, so she endured it quietly, sometimes even in tears. I can clearly remember two times when these heartless men forced her to leave her work for less than the already low price agreed upon; I saw her tears stream down her face as she picked up the pittance they grudgingly gave her, leaving the shop while holding my hand. Even at a young age, I sensed how cruel this treatment was. I heard their harsh words, even if I didn’t fully grasp how much they must have hurt the tender heart of the best mother a child could hope for.

But I comprehended nothing beyond what I saw and heard,—nothing of the merits of the case,—nothing of the nature and bearings of the business,—nothing of the severe laws of trade which govern the conduct of buyer and seller. I did not know that in a large city there are always hundreds of sewing-women begging from these hard employers the privilege of toiling all day, and half-way into the night, in an occupation which never brings even a reasonable compensation, while many times the severity of their labors, the confinement and privation, break down the most robust constitutions, and hurry the weaker into a premature grave.

But I understood nothing beyond what I saw and heard—nothing about the merits of the situation—nothing about the nature and implications of the business—nothing about the harsh laws of trade that dictate the actions of buyers and sellers. I didn't realize that in a big city, there are always hundreds of seamstresses begging these tough employers for the chance to work all day and late into the night in a job that rarely offers fair pay, while often the intensity of their work, the confinement, and the hardships break down even the strongest bodies and lead the weaker ones to an early grave.

I was too young to reason on these subjects, though quick enough to feel for my dear mother. When I saw her full heart overflow in tears, I cried from sympathy. When we got into the street, and her tears dried up, and her habitual cheerfulness returned, I also ceased weeping, and soon forgot the cause. The memory of a child is blissfully fugitive. Indeed, among the blessings that lie everywhere scattered along our pathway, is the readiness with which we all forget sorrows that nearly broke down the spirit when first they fell upon us. For if the griefs of an entire life were to be remembered, all that we suffer from childhood to mature age, the accumulation would be greater than we could bear.

I was too young to think deeply about these things, but I was sensitive enough to care for my dear mother. When I saw her heart overflowing with tears, I cried out of sympathy. Once we got into the street and her tears dried up, and her usual cheerfulness came back, I stopped crying too and soon forgot why I was upset. The memory of a child is fleeting and sweet. In fact, one of the blessings scattered along our path is how easily we forget the sorrows that felt like they might break us when they first hit. Because if we held onto all the griefs of our lives, everything we go through from childhood to adulthood, it would be more than we could handle.

On one occasion, when with my mother at the slop-shop, we found a sewing-woman standing at the counter, awaiting payment for the making of a dozen summer vests. We came up to the counter and stood beside her,—for there were no chairs on which a sewing-woman might rest herself, however fatigued from carrying a heavy bundle for a mile or two in a hot day. And even had there been such grateful conveniences, we should not have been invited to sit down; and unless invited, no sewing-woman would risk a provocation of[Pg 92] the wrath of an ill-mannered shopman by presuming to occupy one. Few employers bestow even a thought upon the comfort of their sewing-women. They seldom think how tired they become with overwork at home, before leaving it with a heavy load for the shop, nor that the bundle grows heavier and heavier with every step that it is carried, or that the weak and over-strained body of the exhausted woman needs rest the moment she sets foot within the door.

Once, when I was with my mom at the supply shop, we saw a seamstress standing at the counter, waiting to get paid for making a dozen summer vests. We approached the counter and stood next to her—there were no chairs for a seamstress to rest in, no matter how tired she was from carrying a heavy bundle for a mile or two on a hot day. Even if there had been such welcome conveniences, we wouldn’t have been invited to sit down; and unless asked, no seamstress would risk angering a rude shopkeeper by taking a seat. Few employers even think about the comfort of their seamstresses. They rarely consider how tired they get from overworking at home before leaving with a heavy load for the shop, or that the bundle feels heavier with every step taken, or that the tired and strained body of the exhausted woman needs rest as soon as she steps through the door.

The woman whom we found at the counter was in the prime of life, plainly, but neatly dressed,—no doubt in her best attire, as she was to be seen in public, and she knew that her whole capital lay in her appearance. I judged her to be an educated lady. Though a stranger to my mother, yet she accosted her so politely, and in a voice so musical, that the gracefulness of her manner and the softness of her tones still linger in my memory. Looking down to me, then less than ten years old, and addressing my mother, she asked,—

The woman we found at the counter was in the prime of her life, simply but neatly dressed—clearly in her best outfit, since she was out in public, and she knew that her whole worth was in her appearance. I could tell she was an educated lady. Although she was a stranger to my mother, she spoke to her so politely and in such a sweet voice that the elegance of her manner and the gentle quality of her tone still stay in my memory. She looked down at me, then under ten years old, and addressed my mother, asking,—

"How many of them have you?"

"How many do you have?"

"Only three, Ma'am," was the reply.

"Only three, Ma'am," was the response.

"I have six of them to struggle for," she said,—adding, after a moment's pause, "and it is hard to be obliged to do it all."

"I have six of them to take care of," she said, pausing for a moment before adding, "and it's tough to have to handle everything myself."

I saw that she was dressed in newly made mourning. I knew what mourning was,—but not then what it was to be a widow. My mother afterwards told me she was such, and was therefore in black. Other conversation passed between the two, during which I looked up into the widow's face with the unreflecting intensity of childish interest. Her voice was so remarkable, so kind, so gentle, so full of conciliation, that it won my heart. There was a sadness in her face which struck me most forcibly and painfully. There was an expression of care, of overwork, and great privation. Yet, for all this, the lines of her countenance were beautiful even in their painfulness.

I noticed she was wearing brand new mourning clothes. I understood what mourning meant—but not yet what it meant to be a widow. My mother later told me she was a widow, which is why she was in black. Some other conversation happened between them while I gazed up at the widow's face with the unthinking intensity of a child’s curiosity. Her voice was so distinctive, so kind, so gentle, and so filled with warmth, that it captured my heart. There was a sadness in her face that struck me deeply and painfully. It showed signs of worry, exhaustion, and significant hardship. Still, despite all of this, the features of her face were beautiful even in their sadness.

While I thus stood gazing up into the widow's face, the shopkeeper came forward from a distant window, by whose light he had been examining the vests, threw them roughly down upon the counter in front of her, and exclaimed in a sharp voice,—

While I stood there staring up at the widow's face, the shopkeeper came over from a window at the back, where he had been looking at the vests, tossed them down onto the counter in front of her, and shouted in a harsh voice,—

"Can't pay for such work as this,—don't want it in the shop,—never had the like of it,—look at that!"

"Can’t pay for work like this—don’t want it in the shop—never had anything like it—look at that!"

He tossed a vest toward my mother, who took it up, and examined it. One end of it hung down low enough for me to catch, and I also undertook the business of inspection. I scanned it closely, and was a sufficient judge of sewing to see that it was made up with a stitch as neat and regular as that of my mother. She must have thought so, too; for, on returning it to the man, she said to him,—

He threw a vest toward my mom, who picked it up and checked it out. One end of it hung down low enough for me to grab, so I also took a look at it. I examined it closely and was skilled enough at sewing to notice that it was made with a stitch just as neat and regular as my mom’s. She must have thought the same, because when she handed it back to the man, she said to him,—

"The work is equal to anything of mine."

"The work is as good as anything of mine."

Hearing a new voice, he then discovered, that, instead of tossing the vest to the poor widow, he had inadvertently thrown it to my mother. Then, addressing the former, he said, in the same sharp tone,—

Hearing a new voice, he then realized that, instead of tossing the vest to the poor widow, he had accidentally thrown it to my mother. Then, turning to the widow, he said in the same sharp tone,—

"Can't pay but half price for this kind of work; don't want any more like it. There's your money; do you want more work?"

"Can't pay more than half price for this kind of work; I don't want any more like it. Here's your money; do you want more work?"

He threw down the silver on the counter. The whole price, or even double, would have been a mere pittance, the widow's mite indeed; but here was robbery of even that. What, in such a case, was this poor creature to do? She had six young and helpless children at home,—no husband to defend her,—no friend to stand between her and the man who thus robbed her. A resort to law were futile. What had she wherewith to pay either lawyer or magistrate? and was not continued employment a necessity? All these thoughts must have flashed across her mind. But in the terrible silence which she kept for some minutes, still standing at the counter, how many others must have succeeded them! What happy images of former comfort came knocking at her heart! what an agonizing sense of present destitution! what a contrast between the brightness of the one and the gloom of the other! and then the[Pg 93] cries of hungry children ringing importunately in her ears! I noticed her all the time, and, child that I was, did so merely because she stood still and made no reply,—utterly unconscious that emotions of any kind were racking her grief-smitten heart. I felt no such emotions myself,—how should I suppose that they had even an existence?

He slammed the silver down onto the counter. The total price, or even double that, would have been just a small amount, like the widow's penny; but this was pure theft of even that. What was this poor woman supposed to do in such a situation? She had six young and helpless kids at home—no husband to protect her—no friend to defend her from the man who was robbing her. Turning to the law would be pointless. What could she use to pay for a lawyer or a magistrate? And wasn’t keeping her job essential? All these thoughts must have raced through her mind. But in the terrible silence she maintained for a few minutes while still standing at the counter, how many other thoughts must have followed? What happy memories of better times must have been haunting her heart! What an agonizing awareness of her current poverty! What a sharp contrast between the brightness of those memories and the darkness of her present situation! And then the cries of her hungry children echoing insistently in her ears! I watched her the whole time, and, being a child, I did so only because she stood there silently and said nothing—completely unaware that feelings of any kind were tearing at her grief-stricken heart. I didn’t feel anything like that myself—how could I understand that such feelings even existed?

She made no answer to the man who had thus wantonly outraged her, but, turning to my mother, looked up into her face as if for pity and advice. Were they not equally helpless victims on the altar of a like domestic necessity, and should not common trials knit them together in the bonds of a common sympathy? A new sadness came over her yet beautiful countenance; but no tear gushed gratefully to relieve her swelling heart. She took up the money,—I saw that her hand was trembling,—placed it in her purse, lifted from the counter a bundle containing a second dozen of vests, and, bidding my mother a graceful farewell, left the scene of this cruel imposition on one utterly powerless either to prevent it or to obtain redress. I have never forgotten the incident.

She didn’t respond to the man who had so cruelly disrespected her, but instead turned to my mother, looking up at her face as if seeking compassion and guidance. Weren’t they both equally powerless victims to the same domestic struggle, and shouldn’t shared hardships connect them with a bond of sympathy? A new sadness washed over her still beautiful features, but no tears came to relieve her aching heart. She picked up the money—I noticed her hand was shaking—put it in her purse, grabbed a bundle containing a second dozen vests from the counter, and, with a graceful goodbye to my mother, left the scene of this harsh deceit aimed at someone completely unable to stop it or seek justice. I have never forgotten that moment.

These labors of my mother were at no time necessary to the support of the family; but, though quiet and retiring in her habits, she had ambitious aspirations for supplying herself with pocket-money by the work of her own hands. As I said before, she was a beautiful sewer on the finest kinds of work, such as, if obtained from the families in which it is worn, would have yielded her remunerative wages. But we lived away beyond the thickly settled portion of the city, had no influential acquaintances from whom it could be procured, and hence my mother, with thousands who were really necessitous, resorted to the tailors, to the meanest as well as to the honorable. When my father heard of the indignities they practised on us, and of the shamefully low prices they paid us, he forbade my mother ever going to them again. He said their whole business was to grow rich by defrauding of their just dues the poor women who were thus competing with each other for work, and that we should do no more for any of them, until we could find an honest man and a gentleman to deal with.

These efforts from my mother were never necessary for the family's support; however, even though she was quiet and reserved, she had ambitions to earn some extra cash through her own work. As I mentioned earlier, she was an excellent seamstress, skilled in fine craftsmanship that, if sourced from the families who wore it, would have paid her well. But we lived far beyond the heavily populated areas of the city and had no influential connections to get such work, so my mother, like thousands of others in genuine need, turned to tailors, both the unscrupulous and the respectable. When my father learned about the mistreatment we faced and the ridiculously low wages we were receiving, he prohibited my mother from going to them again. He said their whole business model depended on getting rich by cheating poor women who were competing for work, and that we should refrain from working for any of them until we could find an honest, gentlemanly person to deal with.

But my father, always busy in his garden or in that of some wealthy neighbor, knew nothing even of the little outside world into which we had penetrated. His generous, unsuspecting nature thus led him to feel sure that the honest and the gentlemanly were to be found in abundance; but he overlooked the fact that it was only his quiet wife upon whom was devolved the task of discovering them, as well as that her explorations had never yet been rewarded with success.

But my dad, always busy in his garden or in some rich neighbor's yard, had no idea about the small outside world we had stepped into. His generous, trusting nature made him believe that honest and gentlemanly people were everywhere; however, he missed the fact that it was only his quiet wife who had the job of finding them, and her searches had never paid off.

Notwithstanding these discouragements, my mother was firmly of opinion that the needle was a woman's only sure dependence against all the vicissitudes of life. She believed, in a general way, that a good needlewoman would never come to want. The idea of diversifying employment for the sex had never crossed her mind; the vocation of woman was to sew. All must not only do it, but they must depend on it. She considered it of little use to think of anything beyond the needle. She could not see, that, if all the women of the country did the same thing, there must inevitably be more laborers than could find employment,—that the competition would be so great among them as to depress prices to a point so low that many women could not live on them,—and that those who did would drag out only a miserable existence.

Despite these downsides, my mom firmly believed that sewing was a woman’s only reliable way to navigate life's ups and downs. She generally thought that a skilled seamstress would never struggle to get by. The idea of women having diverse jobs never even crossed her mind; a woman’s role was to sew. Everyone should do it and rely on it. She thought it pointless to consider anything beyond sewing. She couldn’t see that if all the women in the country did the same thing, there would inevitably be more workers than jobs available—that the competition would be so fierce that it would drive prices so low that many women couldn’t survive on them—and those who could would just scrape by in a miserable existence.

Though a woman of excellent sense, with a tolerable education, and fond of all the reading she could find time to do, still she continued to plead for this supremacy of the needle, even after her humiliating experience at the slop-shops. She was the most industrious sewer I have ever known,—and not only industrious, but neat, conscientious, and rapid. Machines, with iron frames and wheels, had not then been invented; but since they have, I have never seen a better one than my mother. Her frame, if not of iron, seemed[Pg 94] quite as indestructible, even if it did turn out fewer stitches. Times without number has she sat up till midnight, plying her needle by the dull light of a common candle: for there was no gas in our suburban district. While we children were sound asleep, there she sat, not from necessity, but from pure love of work. Yet she was up early, long before any of the dull sleepers of the household had stirred, and had more trouble to get us down to breakfast than to get up the meal itself. I scarcely thought of these things during the young years of my life, when they were occurring; but as I am writing this, they all come thronging before my memory with the freshness of yesterday. They will no doubt seem dull to others; but the recollection is very precious to me.

Though she was a woman of great common sense, with a decent education and a love for any reading she could manage, she still advocated for the dominance of sewing, even after her embarrassing experiences in the garment factories. She was the most hardworking seamstress I've ever known—and not just hardworking, but also neat, conscientious, and quick. Machines with metal frames and wheels hadn’t been invented yet; but ever since they have, I’ve never seen a better seamstress than my mother. Her abilities, while not mechanical, seemed[Pg 94] just as unbreakable, even if she produced fewer stitches. Countless nights, she stayed up until midnight, working her needle by the dim light of a regular candle, since there was no gas in our suburban area. While we children were fast asleep, there she was, not out of necessity, but purely out of her love for work. Yet she was up early, well before any of the heavy sleepers in the house had moved, and had more trouble getting us to breakfast than preparing the meal itself. I rarely thought about these things during my early years when they were happening; but as I write this, all those memories come rushing back to me as if they happened yesterday. They may seem dull to others, but those memories are incredibly precious to me.

With this conviction of its being almost the sole mission of a woman to sew, she made the needle a vital point in my education, as well as in that of my sister. There were two girls of us, and a brother. I was the eldest, and my sister the youngest of the three. Thus, when I was quite a child, I learned to use the needle; and as I grew older, the utmost pains were taken to teach me every branch of sewing, from the commonest to the most difficult. My sister went through the same course of instruction.

With the belief that it was almost a woman's main purpose to sew, she made sure that using a needle was an essential part of my education, as well as my sister's. We were two girls and one brother. I was the oldest, and my sister was the youngest of the three. So, when I was just a child, I learned to use a needle; and as I got older, they took great care to teach me every aspect of sewing, from the simplest tasks to the most complex. My sister received the same training.

At a very early age we were able to make and dress our own dolls, hem our handkerchiefs and aprons, and in due time were promoted to the darning of father's stockings and the patching of his working-clothes. We thought the being able to do these things for him a very great affair, and mother praised us for our work. But when sister Jane once put a patch over a hole in the knee of father's pantaloons, without covering all the rent,—she had let the patch slip down a little,—mother required her to rip it off and put it in the right place: but there was not a word of scolding for Jane; it was all softness, all kindness; she knew that Jane was a child. I think father, however, would never have noticed that the patch was a little out of place; and, indeed, I think it very likely he didn't care about having a patch of any kind put on, for his mind was on work, and not on appearances. But then it was my dear mother's way. We were taught that the needle was to be the staff of our future lives. Whatever we undertook must be done right; and then she had a just pride in making father always look respectable.

At a very early age, we learned to make and dress our own dolls, hem our handkerchiefs and aprons, and eventually graduated to darning Dad's socks and patching his work clothes. We thought being able to do these things for him was a big deal, and Mom praised us for our efforts. But when Sister Jane put a patch over a hole in the knee of Dad's pants without covering the entire tear—she had let the patch slide down a bit—Mom made her take it off and fix it properly; there was no scolding for Jane, just softness and kindness because she understood Jane was just a child. I don’t think Dad would have even noticed that the patch was slightly out of place; in fact, I believe he probably didn’t mind having a patch on his clothes at all, as he focused more on work than appearances. But that was just how our dear mother was. We were taught that the needle would be our guiding tool in life. Everything we did had to be done well, and she took pride in making sure Dad always looked respectable.

Thus in time we came to feel as much pride in being good seamstresses as did our mother. It was natural we should, for we believed all she taught us, and there was no one to controvert her positions,—except sometimes, when father heard her impressing her favorite dogma on our minds, he put in a word of doubt, saying, that, before the needle could be made so sure a dependence for poor women, there must be found a better market for female labor than the slop-shops, and a more honorable race of employers. To this questioning of her doctrine she made no reply, knowing that she had us all to herself, and that a doubt from father, only now and then uttered, would make no impression. But I remember it all now.

So eventually, we took as much pride in being good seamstresses as our mother did. It made sense for us to feel this way because we believed everything she taught us, and no one challenged her views—except sometimes when our father would hear her instilling her favorite beliefs in us. He would express a bit of doubt, saying that before sewing could be a reliable support for poor women, there needed to be a better market for women’s labor than the sweatshops, along with a more respectable class of employers. She didn’t respond to his questioning, knowing she had our full attention and that his rare moments of doubt wouldn’t make much of an impact. But I remember it all now.

I can remember, too, how proud I felt when mother called me to her, one day, and gave me a piece of cotton cloth, of which she said I was to make father a shirt. It was of unbleached stuff, heavy and strong, but still nice and smooth. Father wore only one kind; and as it was to serve for best as well as for common wear, I was to make it as nicely as I could.

I remember how proud I felt when my mom called me over one day and gave me a piece of cotton cloth, telling me I was going to make Dad a shirt. It was unbleached, heavy, and strong, but still nice and smooth. Dad only wore one kind of shirt, and since it was for both special occasions and everyday use, I was supposed to make it as well as I could.

That afternoon all of us children were to go on a little fishing-excursion to the meadows on the Delaware, among the ditches which run all round the inside of the great embankment that has been thrown up to keep out the river. There was a vast expanse of beautiful green meadow inclosed by this embankment, on which great numbers of cattle were annually fatted. As viewed from the bank, it was luxuriant in the extreme; in fact, it was a prairie containing hundreds of acres, trimmed up and cared for with the utmost skill and[Pg 95] watchfulness, and intersected with clean, open ditches, to secure drainage. Into these ditches the tide flowed through sluices in the bank, and thus they were always full of fish.

That afternoon, all of us kids were going on a little fishing trip to the meadows by the Delaware, among the ditches that surround the inside of the big embankment built to keep out the river. There was a huge stretch of beautiful green meadow enclosed by this embankment, where lots of cattle were fattened every year. From the bank, it looked extremely lush; in fact, it was a prairie covering hundreds of acres, maintained with great skill and[Pg 95] care, and crossed by clean, open ditches for drainage. The tide flowed into these ditches through sluices in the bank, so they were always filled with fish.

These beautiful meadows were the resort of thousands who resided in the lower section of the city, for picnics and excursions. The roads through them were as level as could possibly be, and upon them were continual trotting-matches. In summer, the wide flats outside the embankment were over-grown with reeds, among which gunners congregated in numbers dangerous to themselves, shooting rail and reed-birds. On Sundays and other holidays, the wide footpath on the high embankment was a moving procession of people, who came out of the city to enjoy the fresh breeze from the river. All who lived near resorted to these favorite grounds.

These beautiful meadows were a popular getaway for thousands living in the lower part of the city, perfect for picnics and outings. The paths through them were as flat as could be, and there were always trotting races taking place. In the summer, the large open areas outside the embankment were overgrown with reeds, where hunters gathered in dangerous numbers, shooting at rails and reed birds. On Sundays and other holidays, the wide footpath on the high embankment turned into a moving crowd of people escaping the city to enjoy the fresh breeze from the river. Everyone living nearby flocked to these favorite spots.

Several other little boys and girls were to come to our house and go with us. We had long been in the habit of going to the meadows to fish and play, where we had the merriest and happiest of times. Sometimes, though the meadows were only half a mile from us, we took a slice or two of bread-and-butter in a little basket, to serve for dinner, so that we could stay all day; for the meadows and ditches extended several miles below the city, and we wandered and played all the way down to the Point House. On these trips we caught sun-fish, roach, cat-fish, and sometimes perch, and always brought them home. We generally got prodigiously hungry from the exercise we took, and sat down on the thick grass under a tree to eat our scanty dinners. These dinner-times came very early in the day; and long before it was time to go home in the afternoon, we became even more hungry than we had been in the morning,—but our baskets had been emptied.

Several other little boys and girls were going to come to our house and join us. We were used to heading to the meadows to fish and play, where we had the best and happiest times. Sometimes, even though the meadows were only half a mile away, we packed a slice or two of bread and butter in a small basket for lunch, so we could stay all day; the meadows and ditches stretched several miles beyond the city, and we explored and played all the way down to the Point House. On these trips, we caught sunfish, roach, catfish, and sometimes perch, and always brought them home. We usually got really hungry from all the activity and sat down on the thick grass under a tree to eat our meager lunches. These lunch breaks happened very early in the day, and long before it was time to head home in the afternoon, we became even hungrier than we had been in the morning—but our baskets were empty.

I think these young days, with these innocent sports and recreations, were among the happiest of my life. I do not think the fish we caught were of much account, though father was always glad to see them; and I remember how he took each one of our baskets, as we came into the kitchen, looked into it, and turned over and counted the fishes it contained. My brother Fred generally had the most, and I had the fewest: but it seems that even for other things than fishes I never had a taking way about me. Father was very fond of them, for mother had a way of frying their little thin bodies into a nice brown crisp, which made us all a good breakfast. So father had made us lines, with corks and hooks, tied them to nice little poles, and showed us how to use them and keep them in order, and had a corner in the shed in which he taught us to set them up out of harm's way. Occasionally he even went with us to the meadows himself.

I think those early days, with our innocent games and outdoor activities, were some of the happiest of my life. I don’t believe the fish we caught were particularly impressive, but my dad was always happy to see them. I remember how he would take each of our baskets as we came into the kitchen, look inside, and count the fish we had. My brother Fred usually caught the most, and I caught the fewest; it seems I never had a knack for fishing like others did. Dad really liked the fish because Mom knew how to fry them up into a nice, crispy brown, making for a great breakfast. So, Dad made us fishing lines with corks and hooks, tied them to nice little poles, and showed us how to use and take care of them. He even set up a spot in the shed where he taught us to store them safely. Sometimes, he would even come with us to the meadows.

But while I am speaking of these dear times, I must say that we always came home happy, though tired and dirty. Sometimes we got into great mud-holes along the ditch-bank, so deep as to leave a shoe sticking fast, compelling us to trudge home with only one. Then, when we found a place where the fish bit sharply, all of us rushed to the spot, and pushed into the wild rose-bushes that grew in clumps upon the bank: for I generally noticed, that, where the bushes overhung the water and made a little shade, the fish were most abundant. In the scramble to secure a good foothold, the briers tore our clothes and bonnets, sometimes so as to make us fairly ragged, besides scratching our hands and faces terribly. Occasionally one of us slipped into the ditch, and was helped out dripping wet; but we never mentioned such an incident at home. Then more than once we were caught in a heavy shower, with nothing but a rose-bush or a willow-tree for shelter; and there were often so many of us that it was like a hen with an unreasonably large brood of chickens,—some must stay out in the wet, and all such surplusage got soaked to the skin.

But while I’m talking about those special times, I have to say that we always came home happy, even though we were tired and dirty. Sometimes we would get stuck in deep mud holes along the ditch bank, leaving a shoe stuck and forcing us to walk home with just one. Then, when we found a spot where the fish were biting, we all rushed over and pushed into the wild rose bushes that grew in clumps along the bank; I usually noticed that where the bushes hung over the water and created a bit of shade, there were more fish. In the scramble to find a good spot, the thorns ripped our clothes and bonnets, often leaving us looking pretty ragged, not to mention scratching our hands and faces badly. Occasionally one of us would slip into the ditch and need help getting out, soaking wet; but we never talked about it at home. More than once, we got caught in a heavy downpour, with just a rose bush or a willow tree for shelter; and there were often so many of us that it was like a hen with too many chicks—some had to stay out in the rain, and all those extra got soaked to the skin.

But we cared nothing for any of these things. Indeed, I am inclined to think that we were happy in proportion as we got tired, hungry, wet, and dirty. Mother[Pg 96] never scolded us when we came home in this condition. Though we smelt terribly of mud and fish, and were often smeared over with the dried slime of a great slippery eel which had swallowed the hook, and coiled himself in knots all over our lines, and required three or four of the boys to cut off his head and get the hook out, yet all she did was to make us wash ourselves clean, after which she gave us a supper that tasted better than all the suppers we get now, and then put us to bed. We were tired enough to go right to sleep; but it was the fatigue of absolute happiness,—light hearts, light consciences, no care, nothing but the perfect enjoyment of childhood, such as never comes to us but once.

But we didn’t care about any of that. In fact, I think we were happy the more tired, hungry, wet, and dirty we got. Mom[Pg 96] never scolded us when we came home looking like that. Even though we smelled awful from mud and fish, and were often covered in the dried slime of a slippery eel that had swallowed the hook and tangled itself in our lines, needing three or four of the boys to cut off its head and get the hook out, all she did was tell us to clean up. After that, she would give us a dinner that tasted better than any of the meals we have now, and then tuck us into bed. We were tired enough to fall asleep right away, but it was the kind of fatigue that comes from pure happiness—light hearts, clear consciences, no worries, just the perfect joy of childhood that only comes once in a lifetime.

This is a long digression, but it could not be avoided. I said, that, when mother told me I was to make a shirt for father, we were that very afternoon to go down among these dear old meadows and dirty ditches to fish and play. Our lines were all in order, and a new hook had been put on mine, as on the last excursion the old one had caught in what the boys call a "blind eel," that is, a sunken log,—and there it probably remains to this day. Fred had dug worms for us, and they had coiled themselves up into a huge ball in the shell of an old cocoa-nut, ready to be impaled on our hooks. Everything was prepared for a start, and we were only waiting for dinner to be over: though I can remember, that, whenever we had such an afternoon before us, we had very little appetite to satisfy. The anticipation and glee were such that the pervading desire was not to eat, but to be off.

This is a long digression, but it couldn’t be helped. I mentioned that when mom told me I had to make a shirt for dad, we were supposed to head down to those beloved old meadows and muddy ditches that very afternoon to fish and have fun. Our fishing lines were all set up, and I had a new hook on mine since the old one had snagged on what the boys called a "blind eel," which was just a submerged log—and it probably still stuck there to this day. Fred had dug us some worms, and they had all coiled up into a big ball in the shell of an old coconut, ready to be put on our hooks. Everything was ready to go, and we were just waiting for dinner to finish. Even so, I can remember that whenever we had an afternoon like this ahead of us, we barely had any appetite at all. The excitement and joy were so strong that our main desire was not to eat, but to get going.

But when mother gave me the shirt to make, I felt so proud of the trust, that all desire to go to the meadows left me. I felt a new sensation, a new ambition, a new pride. It was very strange that I should thus suddenly give up the ditches, the fishing, the scratching, and the dirt; for none of us loved them more dearly than myself. But they were old and familiar, and father's shirt was a novelty; and novelty is one of the great attractions for the young. So they went without me, and after dinner I sat down to make my first shirt.

But when my mom gave me the shirt to make, I felt a wave of pride from her trust, and all my desire to go to the meadows disappeared. I experienced something new—a fresh ambition, a different kind of pride. It was odd to suddenly give up the ditches, the fishing, the digging, and the mess, since none of us loved them more than I did. But those things were old and familiar, while my dad's shirt was something new; and new experiences are really appealing to young people. So they went without me, and after dinner, I sat down to make my first shirt.

It was to be made in the plainest way; for father had no pride about his dress. I cut it out myself, basted it together, then sewed it with my utmost care. There was to be no nice work about collar or wristband,—no troublesome plaits or gussets,—no machine-made bosom to set in,—only a few gathers,—and all plain work throughout. My mother looked at me occasionally as the shirt progressed, but found no fault. She did not once stop me to examine it; but I feel sure she must have scrutinized it carefully after I had gone to bed. I was so particular in this, my first grand effort to secure the honors of a needlewoman, that quite two days were occupied in doing it.

It was to be made in the simplest way because my dad didn't care much about his clothes. I cut it out myself, basted it together, then sewed it with great care. There would be no fancy work on the collar or wristband—no annoying pleats or gussets—no machine-made front to put in—just a few gathers—and everything else would be plain. My mom glanced at me now and then as I worked on the shirt but didn't find any faults. She never stopped me to check it, but I’m sure she inspected it closely after I went to bed. I was so focused on this, my first big attempt to prove myself as a needleworker, that it took me almost two days to finish.

When all done, I took it to mother, proud of my achievement, telling her, that, if she had more cotton, I was ready to begin another. She looked over it with a slowness that I am sure was intentional, and not at all necessary. The wristbands were all right, the buttons in the proper places, the hemming she said was done well. Then, taking it up by the collar, and holding the garment at full length before her, so that I could see it all, she asked me if I saw anything wrong. I looked closely, but could see no mistake. At last she exclaimed,—

When I was finished, I took it to my mom, feeling proud of what I had made, and told her that if she had more cotton, I was ready to start another one. She examined it slowly, and I was sure it was on purpose, not really needed. The wristbands were fine, the buttons were in the right spots, and she said the hemming was done well. Then, she picked it up by the collar and held the garment fully in front of her, so I could see all of it, and she asked me if I noticed anything wrong. I looked closely but couldn't find any mistakes. Finally, she exclaimed,—

"Why, my dear Lizzie, this is only a bag with arms to it! How is your father to get into it?"

"Why, my dear Lizzie, this is just a bag with arms! How is your father supposed to get into it?"

She turned it all round before me, and showed me that I had left no opening at the bosom and neck,—father could never get it over his head! I cannot tell how astonished and mortified I felt. I cried as only such a child could cry. I sobbed and begged her not to show it to father, and promised to alter it immediately, if she would only tell me how. But, oh, how kind my dear mother was in soothing my excited feelings! There was not a word of blame. She made me comparatively calm by immediately opening the bosom as it should have been done, and showing[Pg 97] me how to finish it. I hurried up to my chamber to be alone and out of sight. They called me to dinner, but my appetite had gone. Though my little heart was full, and my hand trembled, yet long before night the work was done.

She turned it around in front of me and pointed out that I hadn’t left any openings at the chest and neck—Dad would never be able to get it over his head! I can’t explain how shocked and embarrassed I felt. I cried like only a child can. I sobbed and begged her not to show it to Dad, promising I’d fix it right away if she would just tell me how. But, oh, how kind my mom was in calming me down! She didn’t say a word of blame. She helped me relax by quickly opening the chest area as it should have been done and showed[Pg 97] me how to finish it. I rushed up to my room to be alone and out of sight. They called me for dinner, but I had lost my appetite. Even though my heart was full and my hands were shaking, I managed to finish the work long before nightfall.

Oh, how the burden rose from my spirits when my dear mother took me in her arms, kissed me tenderly, and said that my mistake was nothing but a trifle that I would be sure to remember, and that the shirt was far better made than she had expected! When father came in to supper, I took it to him and told him that I had made it. He looked both surprised and pleased, kissed me with even more than his usual kindness,—I think mother must have privately told him of my blunder,—and said that he would surely remember me at Christmas.

Oh, how the weight lifted from my heart when my dear mom held me in her arms, kissed me gently, and said that my mistake was just a small thing that I would definitely remember, and that the shirt was much better made than she had expected! When dad came in for dinner, I showed it to him and told him that I had made it. He looked both surprised and happy, kissed me with more kindness than usual—I think mom must have privately told him about my blunder—and said that he would definitely remember me at Christmas.

I know that incidents like these can be of little interest to any but myself. But what more exciting ones are to be expected in such a history as mine? If they are related here, it is because I am requested to record them. Still, every poor sewing-girl will consider that the making of her first shirt is an event in her career, a difficulty to be surmounted,—and that, even when successfully accomplished, it is in reality only the beginning of a long career of toil.

I realize that events like these might not matter to anyone but me. But what more thrilling stories can you expect in a life like mine? If I'm sharing them here, it's because I'm asked to write them down. Still, every struggling seamstress will see that making her first shirt is a milestone in her journey, a challenge to overcome—and even when she pulls it off, it’s really just the start of a long path of hard work.


MEMORIES OF AUTHORS.

A SERIES OF PORTRAITS FROM PERSONAL ACQUAINTANCE.

THOMAS MOORE.

More than forty years have passed since I first conversed with the poet Thomas Moore. Afterwards it was my privilege to know him intimately. He seldom, of late years, visited London without spending an evening at our house; and in 1845 we passed a happy week at his cottage, Sloperton, in the county of Wilts:—

More than forty years have gone by since I first talked with the poet Thomas Moore. After that, I had the privilege of getting to know him well. He rarely visited London in recent years without spending an evening at our home; and in 1845, we enjoyed a wonderful week at his cottage, Sloperton, in Wiltshire:—

"In my calendar" There are no brighter days!

The poet has himself noted the time in his diary (November, 1845).

The poet himself recorded the date in his diary (November, 1845).

It was in the year 1822 I made his acquaintance in Dublin. He was in the full ripeness of middle age,—then, as ever, "the poet of all circles, and the idol of his own." As his visits to his native city were few and far between, the power to see him, and especially to hear him, was a boon of magnitude. It was, indeed, a treat, when, seated at the piano, he gave voice to the glorious "Melodies" that are justly regarded as the most valuable of his legacies to mankind. I can recall that evening as vividly as if it were not a sennight old: the graceful man, small and slim in figure, his upturned eyes and eloquent features giving force to the music that accompanied the songs, or rather to the songs that accompanied the music.

It was in 1822 that I met him in Dublin. He was at the height of middle age, always "the poet of all circles, and the idol of his own." Since his visits to his hometown were rare, getting to see him, especially to hear him, was a significant opportunity. It was truly a delight when, seated at the piano, he performed the beautiful "Melodies" that are rightly considered his greatest gift to humanity. I can remember that evening as clearly as if it were just a week ago: the elegant man, small and slender, with his upturned eyes and expressive features adding depth to the music that accompanied the songs, or rather to the songs that complemented the music.

Dublin was then the home of much of the native talent that afterwards found its way to England; and there were some, Lady Morgan especially, whose "evenings" drew together the wit and genius for which that city has always been famous. To such an evening I make reference. It was at the house of a Mr. Steele, then High Sheriff of the County of Dublin, and I was introduced there by the Rev. Charles Maturin. The name is not widely known, yet Maturin was famous in his day—and for a day—as the author of two successful tragedies, "Bertram" and "Manuel," (in which the elder Kean sustained the leading parts,) and of several popular novels. Moreover, he was an eloquent[Pg 98] preacher, although probably he mistook his calling when he entered the Church. Among his many eccentricities I remember one: it was his habit to compose while walking about his large and scantily furnished house; and always on such occasions he placed a wafer on his forehead,—a sign that none of his family or servants were to address him then, to endanger the loss of a thought that might enlighten a world. He was always in "difficulties." In Lady Morgan's Memoirs it is stated that Sir Charles Morgan raised a subscription for Maturin, and supplied him with fifty pounds. "The first use he made of the money was to give a grand party. There was little furniture in the reception-room, but at one end of it there had been erected an old theatrical-property throne, and under a canopy of crimson velvet sat Mr. and Mrs. Maturin!"

Dublin was home to a lot of native talent that later made its way to England. Some, like Lady Morgan, hosted evenings that gathered the wit and genius the city is known for. I’m referring to one of those evenings. It took place at the home of Mr. Steele, who was then the High Sheriff of County Dublin, and I was introduced there by Rev. Charles Maturin. Although his name isn’t widely recognized now, Maturin was quite famous in his time as the author of two successful plays, "Bertram" and "Manuel," which featured the leading roles performed by the elder Kean, as well as several popular novels. Additionally, he was an eloquent preacher, though he may have misjudged his calling by joining the Church. Among his many quirks, I recall one: he would compose while walking around his large, sparsely furnished home, always wearing a wafer on his forehead to signal that no one in his family or among the staff was to speak to him, lest they interrupt a thought that could change the world. He was always facing "difficulties." In Lady Morgan's Memoirs, it’s noted that Sir Charles Morgan started a fund for Maturin and provided him with fifty pounds. "The first thing he did with the money was throw a big party. There wasn't much furniture in the reception room, but at one end, there was an old theatrical throne, and underneath a crimson velvet canopy sat Mr. and Mrs. Maturin!"

Among the guests at Mr. Steele's were the poet's father, mother, and sister,—the sister to whom he was so fervently attached. The father was a plain, homely man,—nothing more, and assuming to be nothing more, than a Dublin tradesman.[F] The mother evidently possessed a far higher mind. She, too, was retiring and unpretending,—like her son in features,—with the same gentle, yet sparkling eye, flexible and smiling mouth, and kindly and conciliating manners. It was to be learned long afterwards how deep was the affection that existed in the poet's heart for these humble relatives,—how fervid the love he bore them,—how earnest the respect with which he invariably treated them,—nay, how elevated was the pride with which he regarded them from first to last.

Among the guests at Mr. Steele's were the poet's father, mother, and sister—the sister he was very close to. The father was a simple, unremarkable man, nothing more than a Dublin tradesman. The mother clearly had a much higher intellect. She was also reserved and unassuming, resembling her son in appearance, with the same gentle yet bright eyes, a flexible and smiling mouth, and warm, kind manners. It would be revealed much later just how deep the poet's affection was for these ordinary relatives—how passionate his love for them was—how sincere the respect he always showed them—and indeed, how proud he was of them from beginning to end.

The sister, Ellen, was, I believe, slightly deformed; at least, the memory to me is that of a small, delicate woman, with one shoulder "out." The expression of her countenance betokened suffering, having that peculiar "sharpness" which usually accompanies severe and continuous bodily ailment.[G] I saw more of her some years afterwards, and knew that her mind and disposition were essentially lovable.

The sister, Ellen, was, I think, slightly deformed; at least, I remember her as a small, delicate woman with one shoulder "out." The look on her face showed she was in pain, having that characteristic "sharpness" that usually comes with serious and ongoing physical issues.[G] I saw more of her a few years later and realized that her mind and personality were genuinely lovable.

To the mother—Anastasia Moore, née Codd, a humbly descended, homely, and almost uneducated woman[H]—Moore gave intense respect and devoted affection, from the time that reason dawned upon him to the hour of her death. To her he wrote his first letter, (in 1793,) ending with these lines—

To his mother—Anastasia Moore, née Codd, a modestly born, plain, and nearly uneducated woman[H]—Moore offered deep respect and unwavering love from the moment he became aware of his surroundings until the time of her passing. He wrote his first letter to her (in 1793), concluding with these lines—

"Your absence is almost unbearable,
"And none so bad as—Thomas Moore."

And in the zenith of his fame, when society drew largely on his time, and the highest and best of the land coveted a portion of his leisure, with her he corresponded so regularly that at her death she possessed (it has been so told me by Mrs. Moore) four thousand of his letters. Never, according to the statement of Earl Russell, did he pass a week without writing to her twice, except during his absence in Bermuda, when franks were not to be obtained, and postages were costly.

And at the peak of his fame, when society demanded a lot of his time, and the most esteemed people in the country wanted to spend time with him, he wrote to her so often that when she passed away, she had (as Mrs. Moore told me) four thousand of his letters. According to Earl Russell, he never went a week without writing to her twice, except when he was in Bermuda, where he couldn't get franks and postage was expensive.

When a world had tendered to him its homage, still the homely woman was his "darling mother," to whom he transmitted a record of his cares and his triumphs, his anxieties and his hopes, as if he considered—as I verily believe he did consider—that to give her pleasure was the chief enjoyment of his life. His sister—"excellent Nell"—occupied only a second place in his heart; while his father received as much of his respect as if he had been the hereditary representative of a line of kings.

When the world had shown him its admiration, the down-to-earth woman remained his "darling mother," to whom he shared a record of his worries and achievements, his anxieties and dreams, as if he thought—as I truly believe he did—that making her happy was the greatest joy of his life. His sister—"wonderful Nell"—held only a secondary place in his heart; while his father was given as much respect as if he were the rightful heir of a line of kings.

All his life long, "he continued," according to one of the most valued of his correspondents, "amidst the pleasures of the world, to preserve his home fireside affections true and genuine, as they were when a boy."

All his life, "he continued," according to one of his most valued correspondents, "amidst the pleasures of the world, to keep his home fireside affections true and genuine, just like they were when he was a boy."

To his mother he writes of all his facts and fancies; to her he opens his heart in its natural and innocent fulness; tells her of each thing, great or small, that, interesting him, must interest her,—from his introduction to the Prince, and his visit to Niagara, to the acquisition of a pencil-case, and the purchase of a new pocket-handkerchief. "You, my sweet mother," he writes, "can see neither frivolity nor egotism in these details."

To his mom, he shares all his thoughts and ideas; he reveals his heart in its genuine and innocent fullness; he tells her about everything, big or small, that interests him and should interest her—everything from meeting the Prince and visiting Niagara to getting a pencil case and buying a new pocket handkerchief. "You, my dear mom," he writes, "can find neither frivolity nor selfishness in these details."

In 1806, Moore's father received, through the interest of Lord Moira, the post of Barrack-Master in Dublin, and thus became independent. In 1815, "Retrenchment" deprived him of this office, and he was placed on half-pay. The family had to seek aid from the son, who entreated them not to despond, but rather to thank Providence for having permitted them to enjoy the fruits of office so long, till he (the son) was "in a situation to keep them in comfort without it." "Thank Heaven," he writes afterwards of his father, "I have been able to make his latter days tranquil and comfortable." When sitting beside his death-bed, (in 1825,) he was relieved by a burst of tears and prayers, and by "a sort of confidence that the Great and Pure Spirit above us could not be otherwise than pleased at what He saw passing in my mind."

In 1806, Moore's father got the position of Barrack-Master in Dublin, thanks to Lord Moira, and became financially independent. By 1815, "Retrenchment" cost him that job, and he ended up on half-pay. The family had to rely on their son for support, who urged them not to lose hope, but to be grateful to Providence for allowing them to enjoy the benefits of his position for so long, until he could "keep them comfortable without it." "Thank heaven," he later wrote about his father, "I have been able to make his later years peaceful and comfortable." While sitting by his father's deathbed in 1825, he found comfort in tears and prayers, feeling "a kind of confidence that the Great and Pure Spirit above us couldn't be anything but pleased with what He saw happening in my mind."

When Lord Wellesley, (Lord-Lieutenant,) after the death of the father, proposed to continue the half-pay to the sister, Moore declined the offer, although, he adds,—"God knows how useful such aid would be to me, as God alone knows how I am to support all the burdens now heaped upon me"; and his wife at home was planning how "they might be able to do with one servant," in order that they might be the better able to assist his mother.

When Lord Wellesley, the Lord-Lieutenant, offered to keep the half-pay going to the sister after the father passed away, Moore turned it down, even though he noted, “God knows how helpful that support would be for me, just as God knows how I’m going to handle all the responsibilities now piled on me.” Meanwhile, his wife was at home figuring out how “they could manage with just one servant,” so they could better help his mother.

The poet was born at the corner of Aungier Street, Dublin, on the 28th of May, 1779, and died at Sloperton, on the 25th of February,[I] 1852, at the age of seventy-two. What a full life it was! Industry a fellow-worker with Genius for nearly sixty years!

The poet was born at the corner of Aungier Street, Dublin, on May 28, 1779, and died at Sloperton on February 25,[I] 1852, at the age of seventy-two. What a full life it was! Hard work alongside talent for nearly sixty years!

He was a sort of "show-child" almost from his birth, and could barely walk when it was jestingly said of him, he passed all his nights with fairies on the hills. Almost his earliest memory was having been crowned king of a castle by some of his playfellows. At his first school he was the show-boy of the schoolmaster: at thirteen years old he had written poetry that attracted and justified admiration. In 1797 he was "a man of mark"; at the University,[J] in 1798, at the age of nineteen, he had made "considerable progress" in translating the Odes of Anacreon; and in 1800 he was "patronized" and flattered by the Prince of Wales, who was "happy to know a man of his abilities," and "hoped they might have many opportunities of enjoying each other's society."

He was kind of a "show-kid" almost from the day he was born, and he could barely walk when people jokingly said he spent all his nights hanging out with fairies on the hills. One of his earliest memories was getting crowned king of a castle by some of his friends. At his first school, he was the standout student for the teacher: by thirteen, he had written poetry that impressed everyone. In 1797, he was "a person of significance"; at the University, [J] in 1798, at nineteen, he had made "great strides" in translating the Odes of Anacreon; and in 1800, he was "sponsored" and praised by the Prince of Wales, who was "pleased to meet someone with his talents" and "looked forward to having many chances to enjoy each other's company."

His earliest printed work, "Poems by Thomas Little," has been the subject of much, and perhaps merited, condemnation. Of Moore's own feeling in reference to these compositions of his mere, and thoughtless, boyhood, it may be right to quote two of the dearest of his friends. Thus writes Lisle Bowles of Thomas[Pg 100] Moore, in allusion to these early poems:—

His first published work, "Poems by Thomas Little," has faced a lot of criticism, and probably rightly so. To understand how Moore felt about these careless compositions from his youth, it’s worth quoting two of his closest friends. Lisle Bowles writes about Thomas[Pg 100] Moore, referring to these early poems:—

"—Like Israel's incense laid
At cursed earthly shrines:—

Who, if, in the unthinking gayety of premature genius, he joined the sirens, has made ample amends by a life of the strictest virtuous propriety, equally exemplary as the husband, the father, and the man,—and as far as the muse is concerned, more ample amends, by melodies as sweet as Scriptural and sacred, and by weaving a tale of the richest Oriental colors, which faithful affection and pity's tear have consecrated to all ages." This is the statement of his friend Rogers:—"So heartily has Moore repented of having published 'Little's Poems,' that I have seen him shed tears,—tears of deep contrition,—when we were talking of them."

Who, if in the carefree excitement of early talent, he joined the sirens, has more than made up for it with a life of strict virtue, being exemplary as a husband, father, and man. And as far as the muse is concerned, he has made even greater amends with melodies as sweet as those found in Scripture and sacred texts, weaving a story full of rich Eastern colors, which faithful love and pity’s tears have honored for all time." This is what his friend Rogers said:—"Moore has regretted publishing 'Little's Poems' so much that I've seen him cry—tears of deep remorse—when we talked about them."

I allude to his early triumphs only to show, that, while they would have spoiled nine men out of ten, they failed to taint the character of Moore. His modest estimate of himself was from first to last a leading feature in his character. Success never engendered egotism; honors never seemed to him only the recompense of desert; he largely magnified the favors he received, and seemed to consider as mere "nothings" the services he rendered and the benefits he conferred. That was his great characteristic, all his life. We have ourselves ample evidence to adduce on this head. I copy the following letter from Mr. Moore. It is dated "Sloperton, November 29, 1843."

I bring up his early successes just to demonstrate that, while they would have spoiled nine out of ten people, they didn’t affect Moore’s character. His humble view of himself was a defining quality throughout his life. Success never made him arrogant; accolades never seemed to him simply a reward for what he deserved; he often downplayed the benefits he received and regarded the help he offered and the advantages he provided as mere "trivialities." That was his standout quality, all his life. We have plenty of evidence to support this point. I’ll share the following letter from Mr. Moore. It's dated "Sloperton, November 29, 1843."

"My dear Mr. Hall,—

"My dear Mr. Hall,"—

"I am really and truly ashamed of myself for having let so many acts of kindness on your part remain unnoticed and unacknowledged on mine. But the world seems determined to make me a man of letters in more senses than one, and almost every day brings me such an influx of epistles from mere strangers that friends hardly ever get a line from me. My friend Washington Irving used to say, 'It is much easier to get a book from Moore than a letter.' But this has not been the case, I am sorry to say, of late; for the penny-post has become the sole channel of my inspirations. How am I to thank you sufficiently for all your and Mrs. Hall's kindness to me? She must come down here, when the summer arrives, and be thanked a quattr' occhi,—far better way of thanking than at such a cold distance. Your letter to the mad Repealers was far too good and wise and gentle to have much effect on such rantipoles."[K]

"I’m really and truly ashamed of myself for not recognizing and appreciating so many of your kind acts. But it seems like the world is determined to turn me into a man of letters in more ways than one, and pretty much every day I get so many letters from total strangers that I hardly have time to write to my friends. My friend Washington Irving used to say, 'It’s much easier to get a book from Moore than a letter.' Unfortunately, that hasn't been the case lately; the penny post has become my only source of inspiration. How can I possibly thank you enough for all the kindness you and Mrs. Hall have shown me? She needs to come down here when summer arrives so I can thank her face-to-face—much better than from such a cold distance. Your letter to the crazy Repealers was far too good, wise, and gentle to have much impact on such wild folks." [K]

The house in Aungier Street I visited so recently as 1864. It was then, and still is, as it was in 1779, the dwelling of a grocer,—altered only so far as that a bust of the poet is placed over the door, and the fact that he was born there is recorded at the side. May no modern "improvement" ever touch it!

The house on Aungier Street I visited just recently in 1864. It was then, and still is, just like it was in 1779, the home of a grocer—only changed by a bust of the poet placed above the door, and the fact that he was born there is noted on the side. May no modern "improvement" ever affect it!

"The great Emathian conqueror asked to spare
The home of Pindarus, when temple and tower Hit the ground.

This humble dwelling of the humble tradesman is the house of which the poet speaks in so many of his early letters and memoranda. Here, when a child in years, he arranged a debating society, consisting of himself and his father's two "clerks." Here he picked up a little Italian from a kindly old priest who had passed some time in Italy, and obtained a "smattering of French" from an intelligent émigré, named La Frosse. Here his tender mother watched over his boyhood, proud of his opening promise, and hopeful, yet apprehensive, of his future. Here he and his sister, "excellent Nell," acquired music, first upon an old harpsichord, obtained by his father in discharge of a debt, and afterwards on a piano, to buy which his loving mother had saved up all superfluous pence. Hence he issued to lake country walks with unhappy Robert Emmet. Hither he came—not less proudly, yet as fondly as ever—when college magnates had given him honor, and the King's Viceroy had received him as a guest.[Pg 101]

This modest home of the humble tradesman is the house the poet mentions in many of his early letters and notes. Here, as a young child, he started a debating club with himself and his father's two "clerks." He learned a bit of Italian from a friendly old priest who had spent time in Italy, and picked up a "smattering of French" from a smart émigré named La Frosse. Here, his loving mother watched over his childhood, proud of his early potential, and both hopeful and anxious about his future. Here, he and his sister, "excellent Nell," learned music, first on an old harpsichord that his father got in exchange for settling a debt, and later on a piano that his devoted mother saved up for with her extra pennies. From here, he went out for walks in the lakes with the troubled Robert Emmet. He returned here—not less proudly, but just as fondly as ever—when university officials had honored him, and the King's Viceroy had welcomed him as a guest.[Pg 101]

In 1835 he records "a visit to No. 12, Aungier Street, where I was born." "Visited every part of the house; the small old yard and its appurtenances; the small, dark kitchen, where I used to have my bread and milk; the front and back drawing-rooms; the bedrooms and garrets,—murmuring, 'Only think, a grocer's still!'" "The many thoughts that came rushing upon me, while thus visiting the house where the first nineteen or twenty years of my life were passed, may be more easily conceived than told." He records, with greater unction than he did his visit to the Prince, his sitting with the grocer and his wife at their table, and drinking in a glass of their wine her and her husband's "good health." Thence he went, with all his "recollections of the old shop about him," to a grand dinner at the Viceregal Lodge!

In 1835, he notes, "a visit to No. 12, Aungier Street, where I was born." "I explored every part of the house: the small old yard and its features; the tiny, dark kitchen where I used to have my bread and milk; the front and back drawing rooms; the bedrooms and attics,—murmuring, 'Just think, a grocer's still!'" "The flood of thoughts that rushed over me while visiting the place where I spent the first nineteen or twenty years of my life is easier to imagine than to express." He accounts, with more feeling than during his visit to the Prince, his time sitting with the grocer and his wife at their table, drinking a glass of their wine and toasting to "her and her husband's good health." Afterward, he left, carrying all his "memories of the old shop" with him, to a lavish dinner at the Viceregal Lodge!

I spring with a single line from the year 1822, when I knew him first, to the year 1845, when circumstances enabled us to enjoy the long-looked-for happiness of visiting Moore and his beloved wife in their home at Sloperton.

I jump from a single moment in 1822, when I first met him, to 1845, when we finally had the chance to experience the long-awaited joy of visiting Moore and his beloved wife in their home at Sloperton.

The poet was then in his sixty-fifth year, and had in a great measure retired from actual labor; indeed, it soon became evident to us that the faculty for enduring and continuous toil no longer existed. Happily, it was not absolutely needed; for, with very limited wants, there was a sufficiency,—a bare sufficiency, however, for there were no means to procure either the elegances or the luxuries which so frequently become the necessities of man, and a longing for which might have been excused in one who had been the friend of peers and the associate of princes.

The poet was then sixty-five years old and had mostly stepped back from active work; in fact, it soon became clear to us that his ability to endure and engage in continuous labor was no longer there. Fortunately, it wasn't really necessary; with very few needs, there was just enough—barely enough, though, since there were no resources to obtain either the finer things or the luxuries that often turn into necessities for people, and a desire for those might have been understandable in someone who had been friends with nobles and close to royalty.

The forests and fields that surround Bowood, the mansion of the Marquis of Lansdowne, neighbor the poet's humble dwelling. The spire of the village church, beside the portals of which the poet now sleeps, is seen above adjacent trees. Laborers' cottages are scattered all about. They are a heavy and unimaginative race, those peasants of Wiltshire; and, knowing their neighbor had written books, they could by no means get rid of the idea that he was the writer of Moore's Almanac, and perpetually, greeted him with a salutation, in hopes to receive in return some prognostic of the weather, which might guide them in arrangements for seedtime and harvest. Once, when he had lost his way,—wandering till midnight,—he roused up the inmates of a cottage, in search of a guide to Sloperton, and, to his astonishment, found he was close to his own gate. "Ah, Sir," said the peasant, "that comes of yer skyscraping!"

The forests and fields around Bowood, the home of the Marquis of Lansdowne, are next to the poet's simple house. The steeple of the village church, where the poet now rests, can be seen above the nearby trees. Laborers' cottages are scattered all around. The farmers of Wiltshire are a practical and unrefined lot; knowing their neighbor had written books, they could not shake the belief that he was the author of Moore's Almanac, and they continuously greeted him, hoping to get some weather predictions to help them plan for planting and harvest. Once, when he got lost—wandering until midnight—he woke up the people in a cottage, looking for someone to guide him to Sloperton, and to his surprise, he discovered he was right by his own gate. "Ah, Sir," said the peasant, "that comes from yer skyscraping!"

He was fond of telling of himself such simple anecdotes as this; indeed, I remember his saying that no applause he ever obtained gave him so much pleasure as a compliment from a half-wild countryman, who stood right in his path on a quay in Dublin, and exclaimed, slightly altering the words of Byron,—"Three cheers for Tommy Moore, the pote of all circles, and the darlint of his own!"

He loved to share simple stories about himself like this; in fact, I remember him saying that no applause he ever received made him as happy as a compliment from a somewhat wild local who blocked his way on a dock in Dublin and shouted, slightly changing Byron's words,—"Three cheers for Tommy Moore, the star of all crowds, and the darlint of his own!"

I recall him at this moment,—his small form and intellectual face, rich in expression, and that expression the sweetest, the most gentle, and the kindliest. He had still in age the same bright and clear eye, the same gracious smile, the same suave and winning manner I had noticed as the attributes of his comparative youth; a forehead not remarkably broad or high, but singularly impressive, firm, and full,—with the organ of gayety large, and those of benevolence and veneration greatly preponderating. Ternerani, when making his bust, praised the form of his ears. The nose, as observed in all his portraits, was somewhat upturned. Standing or sitting, his head was invariably upraised, owing, perhaps, mainly to his shortness of stature, with so much bodily activity as to give him the character of restlessness; and no doubt that usual accompaniment of genius was eminently his. His hair, at the time I speak of, was thin and very gray; and he wore his hat with the jaunty air that has been often remarked as a peculiarity of the Irish. In dress, although far from slovenly, he was by no means particular.[Pg 102] Leigh Hunt, speaking of him in the prime of life, says,—"His forehead is bony and full of character, with 'bumps' of wit large and radiant enough to transport a phrenologist. His eyes are as dark and fine as you would wish to see under a set of vine-leaves; his mouth generous and good-humored, with dimples." He adds,—"He was lively, polite, bustling, full of amenities and acquiescences, into which he contrived to throw a sort of roughening cordiality, like the crust of old Port. It seemed a happiness to him to say 'Yes.'" Jeffrey, in one of his letters, says of him,—"He is the sweetest-blooded, warmest-hearted, happiest, hopefullest creature that ever set Fortune at defiance"; he speaks also of "the buoyancy of his spirits and the inward light of his mind"; and adds,—"There is nothing gloomy or bitter in his ordinary talk, but, rather, a wild, rough, boyish pleasantry, much more like Nature than his poetry."

I remember him right now—his small stature and thoughtful face, full of expression, and that expression was the sweetest, gentlest, and kindest. Even in old age, he had the same bright, clear eyes, the same gracious smile, and the same charming manner that I had noticed in his younger years; his forehead wasn't particularly broad or high, but it was striking, firm, and full—his sense of humor was prominent, and he had an abundance of kindness and respect. When Ternerani sculpted his bust, he complimented the shape of his ears. His nose, as seen in all his portraits, was slightly upturned. Whether standing or sitting, his head was always held high, likely due to his short stature, along with so much physical energy that it made him seem restless; no doubt, that typical trait of genius was very much his. At that time, his hair was thin and very gray, and he wore his hat with the lively flair often noted as characteristic of the Irish. In terms of clothing, although he wasn’t sloppy, he wasn’t particularly fussy, either.[Pg 102] Leigh Hunt, talking about him in the height of his life, writes—“His forehead is bony and full of character, with 'bumps' of wit that are large and bright enough to impress a phrenologist. His eyes are as dark and beautiful as you would hope to see beneath a canopy of vine leaves; his mouth is generous and kind, with dimples.” He adds—“He was lively, polite, busy, full of niceties and agreeable gestures, into which he managed to infuse a sort of rugged warmth, like the crust of old Port. It seemed to delight him to say 'Yes.'” Jeffrey, in one of his letters, describes him—“He is the sweetest, warmest-hearted, happiest, most hopeful person that ever defied Fortune”; he also comments on “the buoyancy of his spirits and the inner light of his mind”; and adds—“There’s nothing gloomy or bitter in his everyday conversation, but rather a wild, rough, boyish humor, much more like Nature than his poetry.”

"The light that surrounds him comes entirely from within."

He had but little voice; yet he sang with a depth of sweetness that charmed all hearers: it was true melody, and told upon the heart as well as the ear. No doubt much of this charm was derived from association; for it was only his own "Melodies" he sang. It would be difficult to describe the effect of his singing. I remember some one saying to me, it conveyed an idea of what a mermaid's song might be. Thrice I heard him sing, "As a beam o'er the face of the waters may glow,"—once in 1822, once at Lady Blessington's, and once in my own house. Those who can recall the touching words of that song, and unite them with the deep, yet tender pathos of the music, will be at no loss to conceive the intense delight of his auditors.

He had a subtle voice, but he sang with a sweetness that captivated everyone who listened: it was true melody and resonated in both the heart and the ear. A lot of this charm likely came from familiarity; he only sang his own "Melodies." It's hard to describe the effect of his singing. I remember someone telling me that it evoked the idea of what a mermaid's song might sound like. I heard him sing, "As a beam o'er the face of the waters may glow," three times—once in 1822, once at Lady Blessington's, and once at my own house. Those who can recall the moving words of that song and connect them with the deep yet tender emotion of the music will easily understand the intense delight of his audience.

I occasionally met Moore in public, and once or twice at public dinners. One of the most agreeable evenings I ever passed was in 1830, at a dinner given to him by the members of "The Literary Union." This club was founded in 1829 by the poet Campbell. I shall have to speak of it when I write a "Memory" of him. Moore was in strong health at that time, and in the zenith of his fame. There were many men of mark about him,—leading wits and men of letters of the age. He was full of life, sparkling and brilliant in all he said, rising every now and then to say something that gave the hearers delight, and looking as if "dull care" had been ever powerless to check the overflowing of his soul. But although no bard of any age knew better how to

I sometimes ran into Moore in public, and a couple of times at public dinners. One of the most enjoyable evenings I ever had was in 1830 at a dinner thrown for him by the members of "The Literary Union." This club was started in 1829 by the poet Campbell. I will need to mention it when I write a "Memory" of him. At that time, Moore was in great health and at the peak of his fame. There were many notable people around him—leading wits and writers of the era. He was full of life, sparkling and brilliant in everything he said, occasionally rising to share something that brought joy to the audience, looking as if "dull care" had never been able to dim the brightness of his spirit. But even though no poet from any time knew better how to

"Embellish the bowl with the flowers of the soul,"

he had acquired the power of self-restraint, and could stop when the glass was circulating too freely. At the memorable dinner of the Literary Fund, at which the good Prince Albert presided, (on the 11th of May, 1842,) the two poets, Campbell and Moore, had to make speeches. The author of the "Pleasures of Hope," heedless of the duty that devolved upon him, had "confused his brain." Moore came in the evening of that day to our house; and I well remember the terms of true sorrow and bitter reproach in which he spoke of the lamentable impression that one of the great authors of the age and country must have left on the mind of the royal chairman, then new among us.

he had gained the ability to practice self-control and could stop when the drinks were flowing too freely. At the memorable dinner of the Literary Fund, which was presided over by the good Prince Albert (on May 11, 1842), the two poets, Campbell and Moore, had to give speeches. The author of "The Pleasures of Hope," ignoring the responsibility that rested on him, had "clouded his mind." Moore came to our house that evening, and I clearly remember the expressions of genuine sorrow and sharp criticism with which he reflected on the unfortunate impression that one of the great authors of the age and country must have made on the mind of the royal chairman, who was still new among us.

It is gratifying to record, that the temptations to which the great lyric poet, Thomas Moore, was so often and so peculiarly exposed, were ever powerless for wrong.

It is satisfying to note that the temptations that the great lyric poet, Thomas Moore, frequently faced were always ineffective in leading him astray.

Moore sat for his portrait to Shee, Lawrence, Newton, Maclise, Mulvany, and Richmond, and to the sculptors Ternerani, Chantrey, Kirk, and Moore. On one occasion of his sitting, he says,—"Having nothing in my round potato face but what painters cannot catch,—mobility of character,—the consequence is, that a portrait of me can be only one or other of two disagreeable things,—caput mortuum, or a caricature." Richmond's portrait was taken in 1843. Moore says of it,—"The artist has worked wonders with unmanageable faces such as mine." Of all his portraits, this is the one that pleases[Pg 103] me best, and most forcibly recalls him to my remembrance.

Moore sat for his portrait with Shee, Lawrence, Newton, Maclise, Mulvany, and Richmond, and with the sculptors Ternerani, Chantrey, Kirk, and Moore. During one of his sessions, he remarked, “Since my round potato face has nothing that painters can capture—except the mobility of character—the result is that a portrait of me can only end up being one of two unpleasant things: caput mortuum or a caricature.” Richmond's portrait was created in 1843. Moore commented on it, saying, “The artist has worked wonders with faces like mine that are difficult to manage.” Of all his portraits, this one pleases[Pg 103] me the most and brings him to my mind most vividly.

I soon learned to love the man. It was easy to do so; for Nature had endowed him with that rare, but happy gift,—to have pleasure in giving pleasure, and pain in giving pain; while his life was, or at all events seemed to be, a practical comment on his own lines:—

I soon learned to love the man. It was easy to do; Nature had given him that rare but wonderful gift—finding joy in making others happy and feeling sadness when he caused pain. His life was, or at least seemed to be, a practical reflection of his own words:—

"They might complain about this life; ever since I started it,
"I've found it to be a life full of kindness and happiness."

I had daily walks with him at Sloperton,—along his "terrace-walk,"—during our brief visit; I listening, he talking; he now and then asking questions, but rarely speaking of himself or his books. Indeed, the only one of his poems to which he made any special reference was his "Lines on the Death of Sheridan," of which he said,—"That is one of the few things I have written of which I am really proud." And I remember startling him one evening by quoting several of his poems in which he had said "hard things" of women,—then, suddenly changing, repeating passages of an opposite character, and his saying, "You know far more of my poems than I do myself."

I took daily walks with him at Sloperton—along his "terrace-walk"—during our short visit; I listened while he talked, occasionally asking questions but rarely mentioning himself or his books. In fact, the only poem he brought up specifically was his "Lines on the Death of Sheridan," of which he said, "That's one of the few things I've written that I’m really proud of." I remember surprising him one evening by quoting several of his poems where he had said "harsh things" about women—then, abruptly switching to passages that had the opposite sentiment, and he remarked, "You know far more of my poems than I do myself."

The anecdotes he told me were all of the class of those I have related,—simple, unostentatious. He has been frequently charged with the weakness of undue respect for the aristocracy. I never heard him, during the whole of our intercourse, speak of great people with whom he had been intimate, never a word of the honors accorded to him; and, certainly, he never uttered a sentence of satire or censure or harshness concerning any one of his contemporaries. I cannot recall any conversation with him in which he spoke of intimacy with the great, and certainly no anecdote of his familiarity with men or women of the upper orders; although he conversed with me often of those who are called the lower classes. I remember his describing with proud warmth his visit to his friend Boyse, at Bannow, in the County of Wexford: the delight he enjoyed at receiving the homage of bands of the peasantry, gathered to greet him; the arches of green leaves under which he passed; and the dances with the pretty peasant-girls,—one in particular, with whom he led off a country-dance.[L] Would that those who fancied him a tuft-hunter could have heard him! They would have seen how really humble was his heart. Indeed, a reference to his Journal will show that of all his contemporaries, whenever he spoke of them, he had ever something kindly to say. There is no evidence of ill-nature in any case,—not a shadow of envy or jealousy. The sturdiest Scottish grazier could not have been better pleased than he was to see the elegant home at Abbotsford, or have felt prouder to know that a poet had been created a baronet. When speaking of Wordsworth's absorption of all the talk at a dinner-table, Moore says,—"But I was well pleased to be a listener." And he records, that General Peachey, "who is a neighbor of Southey, mentions some amiable traits of him."

The stories he shared with me were just like the ones I’ve mentioned—simple and unpretentious. People often accused him of being overly respectful of the upper class. Throughout our interactions, I never heard him talk about the well-known individuals he had known, nor did he ever mention the honors he received; and he certainly never made a sarcastic or critical comment about any of his contemporaries. I can’t remember a time when he talked about being close to the prominent, and definitely no stories about his relationships with men or women from the upper class; however, he frequently discussed those he referred to as the lower classes. I recall him proudly describing his visit to his friend Boyse in Bannow, County Wexford: the joy he felt while receiving the admiration of groups of peasants who came out to greet him; the green leaf arches he walked under; and the dances with the lovely peasant girls—especially one particular girl with whom he led a country dance. Would that those who thought he was just seeking favor could have heard him! They would have seen how genuinely humble his heart was. In fact, if you look at his Journal, you’ll see that whenever he mentioned his contemporaries, he always had something kind to say about them. There’s no sign of malice whatsoever—not a hint of envy or jealousy. No Scottish farmer could have been happier to see the beautiful home at Abbotsford or prouder to know that a poet was made a baronet. When discussing how Wordsworth dominated the conversation at a dinner, Moore said, “But I was well pleased to be a listener.” He also noted that General Peachey, “a neighbor of Southey, mentions some nice traits of him.”

The house at Sloperton is a small, neat, but comparatively poor cottage, for which Moore paid originally the princely sum of forty pounds a year, "furnished." Subsequently, however, he became its tenant under a repairing-lease at eighteen pounds annual rent. He took possession of it in November, 1817. Bessy was "not only satisfied, but delighted with it, which shows the humility of her taste," writes Moore to his mother; "for it is a small thatched cottage, and we get it furnished for forty pounds a year." "It has a small garden and lawn in front, and a kitchen-garden behind. Along two of the sides of this kitchen-garden is a raised bank,"—the poet's "terrace-walk," so he loved to call it. Here a small deal table stood through all weathers; for it was his custom to compose as he walked, and at[Pg 104] this table to pause and write down his thoughts. Hence he had always a view of the setting sun; and I believe nothing on earth gave him more intense pleasure than practically to realize the line,—

The house at Sloperton is a small, tidy, but relatively modest cottage, for which Moore originally paid a hefty sum of forty pounds a year, "furnished." Later on, he became its tenant under a repair lease at an annual rent of eighteen pounds. He moved in November 1817. Bessy was "not only satisfied, but delighted with it, which shows the humility of her taste," Moore wrote to his mother; "for it is a small thatched cottage, and we get it furnished for forty pounds a year." "It has a small garden and lawn in front, and a kitchen garden in back. Along two sides of this kitchen garden is a raised bank,"—the poet's "terrace-walk," as he loved to call it. Here a small wooden table stood through all kinds of weather; it was his habit to compose while he walked, and at[Pg 104] this table he would stop to jot down his thoughts. This way he always had a view of the setting sun; and I believe nothing on earth brought him more intense pleasure than to practically realize the line,—

"How beautiful the sun looked as it set!"—

for, as Mrs. Moore has since told us, he very rarely missed this sight.

for, as Mrs. Moore has since told us, he hardly ever missed this sight.

In 1811, the year of his marriage, he lived at York Terrace, Queen's Elm, Brompton. Mrs. Moore tells me it was a pretty house: the Terrace was then isolated, and opposite nursery-gardens. Long afterwards (in 1824) he went to Brompton to "indulge himself with a sight of that house." In 1812 he was settled at Kegworth; and in 1813, at Mayfield Cottage, near Ashbourne, in Derbyshire. Of Mayfield, one of his friends, who twenty years afterwards accompanied him there to see it, remarks on the small, solitary, and now wretched-looking cottage, where all the fine "orientalism" and "sentimentalism" had been engendered. Of this cottage he himself writes,—"It was a poor place, little better than a barn; but we at once took it and set about making it habitable."

In 1811, the year he got married, he lived at York Terrace, Queen's Elm, Brompton. Mrs. Moore says it was a nice house: the Terrace was then separate and faced nursery gardens. Much later (in 1824), he returned to Brompton to "treat himself to a look at that house." In 1812, he settled in Kegworth; and in 1813, at Mayfield Cottage, near Ashbourne in Derbyshire. Regarding Mayfield, one of his friends, who visited him there twenty years later, comments on the small, lonely, and now shabby-looking cottage, where all the great "orientalism" and "sentimentalism" had taken root. About this cottage, he himself writes, "It was a poor place, not much better than a barn; but we immediately took it and started making it livable."

As Burns was made a gauger because he was partial to whiskey, Moore was made Colonial Secretary at Bermuda, where his principal duty was to "overhaul the accounts of skippers and their mates." Being called to England, his affairs were placed in charge of a superintendent, who betrayed him, and left him answerable for a heavy debt, which rendered necessary a temporary residence in Paris. That debt, however, was paid, not by the aid of friends, some of whom would have gladly relieved him of it, but literally by "the sweat of his brow." Exactly so it was when the MS. "Life of Byron" was burned: it was by Moore, and not by the relatives of Byron, (neither was it by aid of friends,) the money he had received was returned to the publisher who had advanced it. "The glorious privilege of being independent" was, indeed, essentially his,—in his boyhood, throughout his manhood, and in advanced age,—always!

As Burns got a job as a gauger because he loved whiskey, Moore became Colonial Secretary in Bermuda, where his main job was to "check the accounts of captains and their crew." When he was called back to England, he left his affairs in the hands of a superintendent, who betrayed him and left him responsible for a large debt, which forced him to live temporarily in Paris. However, that debt was paid off, not with the help of friends—some of whom would have gladly helped him—but through "the sweat of his brow." It was the same when the manuscript of "Life of Byron" was destroyed: it was Moore, not Byron's relatives (nor with the help of friends), who returned the money he received to the publisher who had advanced it. "The glorious privilege of being independent" was, indeed, truly his—throughout his youth, his adult life, and even in his later years—always!

In 1799 he came to London to enter at the Middle Temple. (His first lodging was at 44, George Street, Portman Square.) Very soon afterwards we find him declining a loan of money proffered him by Lady Donegal. He thanked God for the many sweet things of this kind God threw in his way, yet at that moment he was "terribly puzzled how to pay his tailor." In 1811, his friend Douglas, who had just received a large legacy, handed him a blank check, that he might fill it up for any sum he needed. "I did not accept the offer," writes Moore to his mother; "but you may guess my feelings." Yet just then he had been compelled to draw on his publisher, Power, for a sum of thirty pounds, "to be repaid partly in songs," and was sending his mother a second-day paper, which he was enabled "to purchase at rather a cheap rate." Even in 1842 he was "haunted worryingly," not knowing how to meet his son Russell's draft for one hundred pounds; and a year afterwards he utterly drained his banker to send fifty pounds to his son Tom. Once, being anxious that Bessy should have some money for the poor at Bromham, he sent a friend five pounds, requesting him to forward it to Bessy as from himself; and when urged by some thoughtless person to make a larger allowance to his son Tom, in order that he might "live like a gentleman," he writes,—"If I had thought but of living like a gentleman, what would have become of my dear father and mother, of my sweet sister Nell, of my admirable Bessy's mother?" He declined to represent Limerick in Parliament, on the ground that his "circumstances were not such as to justify coming into Parliament at all, because to the labor of the day I am indebted for my daily support." His must be a miserable soul who could sneer at the poet studying how he could manage to recompense the doctor who would "take no fees," and at his amusement when Bessy was "calculating whether they could afford the expense of a fly to Devizes."[Pg 105]

In 1799, he arrived in London to join the Middle Temple. (His first place was at 44 George Street, Portman Square.) Not long after, he turned down a loan from Lady Donegal. He thanked God for the many kind gestures like this that came his way, but at that moment he was "terribly puzzled how to pay his tailor." In 1811, his friend Douglas, who had just gotten a large inheritance, handed him a blank check so he could fill it out for any amount he needed. "I didn’t accept the offer," Moore wrote to his mother; "but you can imagine how I felt." At that time, he had to borrow thirty pounds from his publisher, Power, "to be repaid partly in songs," and was sending his mother a second-day paper, which he managed "to buy at a pretty cheap price." Even in 1842, he was "worryingly haunted," not knowing how to cover his son Russell's draft for one hundred pounds; a year later, he completely drained his bank account to send fifty pounds to his son Tom. Once, wanting to ensure that Bessy had some money for the poor in Bromham, he sent a friend five pounds with a request to give it to Bessy as if it were from him; and when a careless person urged him to give his son Tom a bigger allowance so he could "live like a gentleman," he wrote, "If I had thought only of living like a gentleman, what would have happened to my dear father and mother, my sweet sister Nell, and my wonderful Bessy’s mother?" He turned down the opportunity to represent Limerick in Parliament, saying his "circumstances were not such that it made sense to enter Parliament at all, because to my daily work I owe my daily support." It must be a sad soul who could mock the poet trying to figure out how to repay the doctor who would "take no fees," or find humor in Bessy "calculating whether they could afford the cost of a fly to Devizes."[Pg 105]

As with his mother, so with his wife. From the year 1811, the year of his marriage,[M] to that of his death, in 1852, she received from him the continual homage of a lover; away from her, no matter what were his allurements, he was ever longing to be at home. Those who love as he did wife, children, and friends will appreciate, although the worldling cannot, such commonplace sentences as these:—"Pulled some heath on Ronan's Island (Killarney) to send to my dear Bessy"; when in Italy, "got letters from my sweet Bessy, more precious to me than all the wonders I can see"; while in Paris, "sending for Bessy and my little ones; wherever they are will be home, and a happy home to me." When absent, (which was rarely for more than a week,) no matter where or in what company, seldom a day passed that he did not write a letter to Bessy. The home enjoyments, reading to her, making her the depositary of all his thoughts and hopes,—they were his deep delights, compensations for time spent amid scenes and with people who had no space in his heart. Even when in "terrible request," his thoughts and his heart were there,—in

As with his mother, so with his wife. From 1811, the year he married,[M] until his death in 1852, he continuously honored her like a lover; away from her, no matter how tempting other distractions were, he always wanted to be at home. Those who love like he did—wife, children, and friends—will understand, even if those focused on worldly matters cannot, simple statements like: “Picked some heather on Ronan's Island (Killarney) to send to my dear Bessy”; while in Italy, “received letters from my sweet Bessy, more valuable to me than all the wonders I can see”; and while in Paris, “calling for Bessy and my little ones; wherever they are will be home, and a happy home to me.” When he was away (which was rarely for more than a week), no matter where he was or who he was with, he seldom went a day without writing a letter to Bessy. The joys of home, reading to her, sharing all his thoughts and hopes with her—these were his true delights, compensations for the time spent amidst scenes and people who held no place in his heart. Even when in “great demand,” his thoughts and heart were there,—in

"That beloved home, that lifesaving ark,
Where I've finally found the true light of love,
Cheering inside when everything gets dark
And bleak and stormy all around.

This is the tribute of Earl Russell to the wife of the poet Moore:—"The excellence of his wife's moral character, her energy and courage, her persevering economy, made her a better and even a richer partner to Moore than an heiress of ten thousand a year would have been, with less devotion to her duty, and less steadiness of conduct." Moore speaks of his wife's "democratic pride." It was the pride that was ever above a mean action, and which sustained him in the proud independence that marked his character from birth to death.

This is the tribute of Earl Russell to the wife of the poet Moore:—"The excellence of his wife's moral character, her energy and courage, her unwavering commitment to managing their finances, made her a better and even wealthier partner for Moore than an heiress with an income of ten thousand a year would have been, if she had less devotion to her responsibilities and less consistency in her behavior." Moore talks about his wife's "democratic pride." It was a pride that was always above any petty actions and which supported him in the proud independence that defined his character from birth to death.

In March, 1846, his diary contains this sad passage:—"The last of my five children is gone, and we are left desolate and alone. Not a single relation have I in this world." His father had died in 1825; his sweet mother in 1832; "excellent Nell" in 1846; and his children one after another, three of them in youth, and two grown up to manhood,—his two boys, Tom and Russell, the first-named of whom died in Africa in 1846, an officer in the French service; the other at Sloperton in 1842, soon after his return from India, having been compelled by ill-health to resign his commission as a lieutenant in the Twenty-Fifth Regiment.

In March 1846, his diary includes this heartbreaking entry: "The last of my five children is gone, leaving us desolate and alone. I have no relatives left in this world." His father passed away in 1825, his beloved mother in 1832, "wonderful Nell" in 1846, and his children one by one—three of them while they were still young, and two who reached adulthood—his two sons, Tom and Russell. Tom died in Africa in 1846 while serving as an officer in the French army; Russell passed away at Sloperton in 1842 shortly after returning from India, having had to resign his commission as a lieutenant in the Twenty-Fifth Regiment due to health issues.

In 1835 the influence of Lord Lansdowne obtained for Moore a pension of three hundred pounds a year from Lord Melbourne's government,—"as due from any government, but much more from one some of the members of which are proud to think themselves your friends." The "wolf, poverty," therefore, in his latter years, did not prowl so continually about his door. But there was no fund for luxuries, none for the extra comforts that old age requires. Mrs. Moore now lives on a crown pension of one hundred pounds a year, and the interest of the sum of three thousand pounds,—the sum advanced by the ever-liberal friends of the poet, the Longmans, for the Memoirs and Journal edited by Lord John, now Earl, Russell,—a lord whom the poet dearly loved.

In 1835, Lord Lansdowne's influence secured Moore a pension of three hundred pounds a year from Lord Melbourne's government—“as a responsibility of any government, but especially one where some members are proud to consider themselves your friends.” So, the "wolf of poverty" didn’t hang around his home as much in his later years. However, there weren’t any funds for luxuries, nor for the extra comforts that come with old age. Mrs. Moore now survives on a crown pension of one hundred pounds a year, along with the interest from three thousand pounds—the amount provided by the ever-generous friends of the poet, the Longmans, for the Memoirs and Journal edited by Lord John, now Earl, Russell—a lord whom the poet cherished deeply.

When his diary was published, as from time to time volumes of it appeared, slander was busy with the fame of one of the best and most upright of all the men that God ennobled by the gift of genius.[N] For my own part,[Pg 106] I seek in vain through the eight thick volumes of that diary for any evidence that can lessen the poet in this high estimate. I find, perhaps, too many passages fitted only for the eye of love or the ear of sympathy; but I read no one that shows the poet other than the devoted and loving husband, the thoughtful and affectionate parent, the considerate and generous friend.

When his diary was published, and as volumes were released from time to time, rumors spread about the reputation of one of the best and most honorable men whom God blessed with the gift of genius.[N] For my part,[Pg 106] I search through the eight thick volumes of that diary without finding anything that diminishes the poet's high standing. I might come across too many passages meant only for the eyes of love or the ears of sympathy, but I see no one that portrays the poet as anything other than a devoted and loving husband, a thoughtful and caring parent, and a considerate and generous friend.

It was said of him by Leigh Hunt, that Lord Byron summed up his character in a sentence,—"Tommy loves a lord!" Perhaps he did; but if he did, only such lords as Lansdowne and Russell were his friends. He loved also those who are "lords of humankind" in a far other sense; and, as I have shown, there is nothing in his character that stands out in higher relief than his entire freedom from dependence. To which of the great did he apply during seasons of difficulty approaching poverty? Which of them did he use for selfish purposes? Whose patronage among them all was profitable? To what Baäl did the poet Moore ever bend the knee?

It was said by Leigh Hunt that Lord Byron summed up his character in a single statement: "Tommy loves a lord!" Maybe he did; but if he did, it was only lords like Lansdowne and Russell who were his friends. He also cared for those who are "lords of humankind" in a very different sense; and, as I’ve shown, there’s nothing in his character that stands out more than his complete freedom from dependence. Which of the great did he turn to during tough times that came close to poverty? Which of them did he exploit for selfish reasons? Whose support among them was ever advantageous? To what Baäl did the poet Moore ever bow down?

He had a large share of domestic sorrows; one after another, his five beloved children died; I have quoted his words, "We are left—alone." His admirable and devoted wife survives him. I visited, a short time ago, the home that is now desolate. If ever man was adored where adoration, so far as earth is concerned, is most to be hoped for and valued, it is in the cottage where the poet's widow lives, and will die.

He experienced a lot of personal grief; one after another, his five beloved children passed away; I have quoted his words, "We are left—alone." His wonderful and devoted wife is still here. I visited the home that is now empty not long ago. If anyone was truly adored in a way that's most meaningful in this world, it's in the cottage where the poet's widow lives and will eventually pass away.

Let it be inscribed on his tomb, that ever, amid privations and temptations, the allurements of grandeur and the suggestions of poverty, he preserved his self-respect; bequeathing no property, but leaving no debts; having had no "testimonial" of acknowledgment or reward,—seeking none, nay, avoiding any; making millions his debtors for intense delight, and acknowledging himself paid by the poet's meed, "the tribute of a smile"; never truckling to power; laboring ardently and honestly for his political faith, but never lending to party that which was meant for mankind; proud, and rightly proud, of his self-obtained position, but neither scorning nor slighting the humble root from which he sprang.

Let it be written on his tomb that, through hardships and temptations, the temptations of fame and the struggles of poverty, he maintained his self-respect; leaving no wealth behind but also no debts; having received no accolades or rewards—seeking none, and even avoiding them; making millions owe him for the joy he brought, and feeling fulfilled by the poet's reward, "the tribute of a smile"; never bowing to power; working passionately and honestly for his political beliefs, but never giving to any party what was meant for humanity; proud, and justifiably proud, of his self-earned status, but neither looking down on nor disregarding the humble beginnings from which he came.

He was born and bred a Roman Catholic; but his creed was entirely and purely catholic. Charity was the outpouring of his heart; its pervading essence was that which he expressed in one of his Melodies,—

He was born and raised a Roman Catholic; but his beliefs were completely and genuinely universal. Kindness flowed from his heart; its fundamental essence was what he conveyed in one of his Melodies,—

"Should I ask the brave soldier fighting next to me,
In the interest of humanity, do our beliefs align? Should I give up the friend I’ve valued and tried,
"If he doesn't kneel before the same altar as me?"

His children were all baptized and educated members of the Church of England. He attended the parish church, and according to the ritual of the Church of England he was buried.

His children were all baptized and educated members of the Church of England. He went to the parish church, and according to the Church of England's rituals, he was buried.

It was not any outward change of religion, but homage to a purer and holier faith, that induced him to have his children baptized and brought up as members of the English Church. "For myself," he says, "my having married a Protestant wife gave me opportunity of choosing a religion, at least for my children; and if my marriage had no other advantage, I should think this quite sufficient to be grateful for."

It wasn’t just a change of religion on the surface, but a tribute to a more pure and holy faith that led him to have his kids baptized and raised as members of the English Church. "As for me," he says, "marrying a Protestant wife gave me the chance to choose a religion, at least for my children; and if my marriage offered no other benefit, I would consider this alone enough to be thankful for."

Moore was the eloquent advocate of his country, when it was oppressed, goaded, and socially enthralled; but when time and enlightened policy removed all distinctions between the Irishman and the Englishman, between the Protestant and the Roman Catholic, his muse was silent, because content; nay, he protested in impressive verse[Pg 107] against a continued agitation that retarded her progress, when her claims were admitted, her rights acknowledged, and her wrongs redressed.

Moore was the passionate voice for his country when it was suffering, pushed around, and socially trapped; but when time and progressive policies erased the differences between the Irish and the English, and between Protestants and Catholics, he fell silent, because he was satisfied; in fact, he boldly wrote in powerful verse[Pg 107] against ongoing unrest that held back progress, when her demands were recognized, her rights accepted, and her injustices corrected.

Reference to the genius of Moore is needless. My object in this "Memory" is to offer homage to his moral and social worth. The world that obtains intense delight from his poems, and willingly acknowledges its debt to the poet, has been less ready to estimate the high and estimable character, the loving and faithful nature of the man. There are, however, many—may this humble tribute augment the number!—by whom the memory of Thomas Moore is cherished in the heart of hearts; to whom the cottage at Sloperton will be a shrine while they live,—that grave beside the village church a monument better loved than that of any other of the men of genius by whom the world is delighted, enlightened, and refined.

Reference to the genius of Moore is unnecessary. My aim in this "Memory" is to pay tribute to his moral and social value. The world that finds great joy in his poems, and openly recognizes its gratitude to the poet, has been less inclined to appreciate the noble and admirable character, the loving and loyal nature of the man. There are, however, many—may this humble tribute increase their numbers!—who hold the memory of Thomas Moore deep in their hearts; for whom the cottage at Sloperton will remain a sanctuary as long as they live,—that grave next to the village church a monument they cherish more than that of any other genius who has delighted, enlightened, and refined the world.

"That God is love," writes his friend and biographer, Earl Russell, "was the summary of his belief; that a man should love his neighbor as himself seems to have been the rule of his life." The Earl of Carlisle, inaugurating the statue of the poet,[O] bore testimony to his moral and social worth "in all the holy relations of life,—as son, as brother, as husband, as father, as friend"; and on the same occasion, Mr. O'Hagan, Q.C., thus expressed himself:—"He was faithful to all the sacred obligations and all the dear charities of domestic life,—he was the idol of a household."

"That God is love," writes his friend and biographer, Earl Russell, "was the essence of his belief; that a person should love their neighbor as themselves seems to have been the guiding principle of his life." The Earl of Carlisle, at the unveiling of the poet's statue,[O] acknowledged his moral and social value "in all the important roles of life— as son, as brother, as husband, as father, as friend"; and at the same event, Mr. O'Hagan, Q.C., expressed: "He was devoted to all the sacred duties and all the cherished relationships of family life—he was the beloved figure of a household."

Perhaps a better, though a far briefer, summary of the character of Thomas Moore than any of these may be given in the words of Dr. Parr, who bequeathed to him a ring:—

Perhaps a better, although much shorter, summary of the character of Thomas Moore than any of these could be given in the words of Dr. Parr, who left him a ring:—

"To one who stands high in my estimation for original genius, for his exquisite sensibility, for his independent spirit, and incorruptible integrity."

"To someone I greatly admire for their original talent, exquisite sensitivity, independent spirit, and unshakeable integrity."

FOOTNOTES:

[F] Mrs. Moore—writing to me in May, 1864—tells me I have a wrong impression as to Moore's father; that he was "handsome, full of fun, and with good manners." Moore himself calls him "one of Nature's gentlemen."

[F] Mrs. Moore—writing to me in May 1864—says I have the wrong idea about Moore's dad; that he was "good-looking, fun-loving, and polite." Moore himself refers to him as "one of Nature's gentlemen."

[G] Mrs. Moore write me, that I am here also wrong in my impression. "She was only a little grown out in one shoulder, but with good health; her expression was feeling, not suffering." "Dear Ellen," she adds, "was the delight of every one that knew her,—sang sweetly,—her voice very like her brother's. She died suddenly, to the grief of my loving heart."

[G] Mrs. Moore wrote to me that I am mistaken in my impression here as well. "She was just slightly uneven in one shoulder, but in good health; her expression was one of feeling, not suffering." "Dear Ellen," she adds, "was the joy of everyone who knew her—sang beautifully—her voice very much like her brother's. She passed away suddenly, to the sorrow of my loving heart."

[H] She was born in Wexford, where her father kept a "general shop." Moore used to say playfully, that he was called, in order to dignify his occupation, "a provision merchant." When on his way to Bannow in 1835 to spend a few days with his friend Thomas Boyse,—a genuine gentleman of the good old school,—he records his visit to the house of his maternal grandfather. "Nothing," he says, "could be more humble and mean than the little low house that remains to tell of his whereabouts."

[H] She was born in Wexford, where her dad ran a "general store." Moore used to jokingly say that he was referred to as "a provision merchant" to give his job a bit more prestige. On his way to Bannow in 1835 to spend a few days with his friend Thomas Boyse—a true gentleman from the old days—he writes about his visit to his maternal grandfather's house. "Nothing," he says, "could be more humble and shabby than the little low house that still stands to mark his presence."

I visited this house in the summer of 1864. It is still a small "general shop," situate in the old corn-market of Wexford. The rooms are more than usually quaint. Here Mrs. Moore lived until within a few weeks of the birth of her illustrious son. We are gratified to record, that, at our suggestion, a tablet has been placed over the entrance-door, stating in few words the fact that there the mother was born and lived, and that to this house the poet came, on the 26th of August, 1835, when in the zenith of his fame, to render homage to her memory. He thus writes of her and her birthplace in his "Notes" of that year:—"One of the noblest-minded, as well as most warm-hearted, of all God's creatures was born under that lowly roof."

I visited this house in the summer of 1864. It’s still a small "general shop," located in the old corn market of Wexford. The rooms are particularly charming. Here, Mrs. Moore lived until just a few weeks before the birth of her famous son. We’re pleased to share that, at our suggestion, a plaque has been placed over the entrance, stating in simple words that this is where his mother was born and lived, and that the poet came to this house on August 26, 1835, at the height of his fame, to pay tribute to her memory. He writes about her and her birthplace in his "Notes" from that year:—"One of the noblest-minded, as well as most warm-hearted, of all God's creatures was born under that lowly roof."

[I] I find in Earl Russell's memoir the date given as the 26th of February; but Mrs. Moore altered it in my MSS. to February 25.

[I] I see in Earl Russell's memoir that the date is listed as February 26, but Mrs. Moore changed it in my manuscripts to February 25.

[J] Trinity College, Dublin.—Thomas Moore, son of John Moore, merchant, of Dublin, aged 14, pensioner, entered 2d June, 1794. Tutor, Dr. Burrows.

[J] Trinity College, Dublin.—Thomas Moore, son of John Moore, merchant from Dublin, 14 years old, entered on June 2, 1794, as a pensioner. Tutor: Dr. Burrows.

[K] Alluding to a pamphlet-letter I had printed, addressed to Repealers, when the insanity of Repeal (now happily dead) was at fever-heat.

[K] Referring to a pamphlet-letter I had printed, directed at those in favor of Repeal, during the intense period when the Repeal movement (which is thankfully over now) was at its peak.

[L] "One of them (my chief muse) was a remarkably pretty girl; when I turned round to her, as she accompanied my triumphal ear, and said, 'This is a long journey for you,' she answered, with a smile that would have done your heart good, 'Oh, I only wish, Sir, it was three hundred miles!' There's for you! What was Petrarch in the Capitol to that?"—Journal, &c.—This "pretty girl's" name is ——, and, strange to say, she still keeps it.

[L] "One of them (my main inspiration) was a really beautiful girl; when I turned to her, as she joined my victorious parade, and said, 'This is quite a trip for you,' she replied, with a smile that would warm anyone's heart, 'Oh, I only wish, Sir, it was three hundred miles!' Can you believe that? What was Petrarch's experience in the Capitol compared to this?"—Journal, &c.—This "beautiful girl's" name is ——, and, oddly enough, she still has it.

[M] Moore was married to Miss Elizabeth Dyke, at St. Martin's Church, on the 25th of March, 1811.

[M] Moore married Miss Elizabeth Dyke at St. Martin's Church on March 25, 1811.

[N] There were two who sought to throw filth upon the poet's grave, and they were his own countrymen,—Charles Phillips and John Wilson Croker. The former had written a wretched and unmeaning pamphlet, which he suppressed when a few copies only were issued; and I am proud to believe it was in consequence of some remarks upon it written by me, for which he commenced, but subsequently abandoned, proceedings against me for libel. The atrocious attack on Moore in the "Quarterly Review" was written by John Wilson Croker. It was the old illustration of the dead lion and the living dog. Yet Croker could at that time be scarcely described as living; it was from his death-bed he shot the poisoned arrow. And what brought out the venom? Merely a few careless words of Moore's, in which he described Croker "as a scribbler of all work," words that Earl Russell would have erased, if it had occurred to him to do so. Another countryman, Thomas Crofton Croker, assailed after his death the man whose shoe-latchets he would have been proud to unloose during his life. Moreover, his earliest slanderer was also of his own country,—an author named Quin. Of a truth it has been well said, A prophet is never without honor save in his own country. The proverb is especially true as regards Irish prophets. Assuredly, Moore was, and is, more popular in every part of the world than he was or is in Ireland. The reason is plain: he was, so to speak, of two parties, yet of neither: the one could not forgive his early aspirations for liberty, uttered in imperishable verse; the other could not pardon what they called his desertion of their cause, when he saw that England was willing to do, and was doing, justice to Ireland.

[N] There were two people who tried to tarnish the poet's grave, and they were his own countrymen—Charles Phillips and John Wilson Croker. The former wrote a terrible and pointless pamphlet, which he pulled back after only a few copies were released; I’m proud to believe it was due to some comments I made about it that led him to start, but later drop, legal action against me for libel. The vicious attack on Moore in the "Quarterly Review" was written by John Wilson Croker. It was the classic example of the dead lion and the living dog. Yet at that time, Croker could hardly be described as living; he shot the poisoned arrow from his deathbed. And what triggered the spite? Just a few offhand remarks by Moore, where he referred to Croker as "a scribbler of all work," words that Earl Russell would have removed if he had thought to do so. Another countryman, Thomas Crofton Croker, attacked the man whose shoe-latchets he would have been honored to untie during his life. Besides, his earliest slanderer was also from his own country—an author named Quin. Truly, it has been accurately said, a prophet is never without honor except in his own country. This saying is especially true for Irish prophets. Moore was certainly more popular everywhere in the world than he was in Ireland. The reason is clear: he was, in a sense, part of two groups, yet belonging to neither; one couldn't forgive his early hopes for freedom expressed in unforgettable verse, while the other couldn't forgive what they saw as his abandonment of their cause when he realized that England was willing to do, and was doing, justice for Ireland.

[O] A bronze statue of Moore has been erected in College Street, Dublin. It is a poor affair, the production of his namesake, the sculptor. Bad as it is, it is made worse by contrast with its neighbor, Goldsmith,—a work by the great Irish artist, Foley,—a work rarely surpassed by the art of the sculptor at any period in any country.

[O] A bronze statue of Moore has been put up on College Street, Dublin. It's not great, created by the sculptor who shares his name. As bad as it is, it looks even worse next to its neighbor, Goldsmith—a piece by the talented Irish artist, Foley—which is rarely matched by sculptural art in any era or place.


ON BOARD THE SEVENTY-SIX

[Written for Bryant's Seventieth Birthday.]

Our ship was tossed around in a furious sea,
Her rudder is gone, and her mainmast is over the side; Her scuppers, struggling to break free from the waves' grasp, Traced threads of priceless red through the waves; Sails, rigging, and masts with pirate cannons ripped apart,
We lay, waiting for dawn.
Waiting for the morning, a morning that taunts despair; And she who held the promise of the world Inside her sides, now hopeless, without help, exposed, Thrown randomly over the bewildering waters; The smell of battle drifting slowly to the side Not gloomier than us.
Morning finally arrived to look into our sorrow,
Look, a sail! Help is surely close by; The red cross flies high, a promise from Christ; but no,
Her black guns displaying hatred, she rushes by. And calls out to us: "Did you hear the news? Ah, we figured as much!
"Sink then, loaded with curses!"
[Pg 108]
I leaned against my gun, still feeling heated with anger,
And my eyelids tingled with the tears I was holding back; This disdain seemed to me crueler than a bullet; The strong death grip in the chaos of battle,
Yard-arm to yard-arm, they were much friendlier. Than such fear-driven war.
There our enemy lay like a wounded beast, The angrier he got about his injury. What should we do now? Once again, pull bravely at the root of danger.
Though death may come with it? Or avoid the test
In this world of ours, whether right or wrong, according to God... Join forces with higher powers?
Some, barely loyal, felt their pulses slow down. With the slow rhythm that questions and then loses hope; Some coward would have attacked the starry flag. That connects us to our past and makes us heirs
Of the bravest deeds ever accomplished Beneath the all-seeing sun.
But there was one, the Singer of our group,
On whose head Age held his peaceful sign,
But whose red blood showed no signs of surrender; And lying down beneath the brows of a massive line,
The eyes, like weapons hidden behind a barrier,
Watched, charged with lightning still.
The voices of the hills did what he commanded; The torrents shone and rushed in his song;
He brought our native fields from afar,
Or place us among the countless crowd
Of timeless woods, or where we felt the peace Evening prayer at the homestead.
But now he sang about believing in things we can't see,
Of the freedom we were given as our birthright; And he spoke words of brave encouragement in between, That made all worldly wealth feel like dust,
In line with that responsibility, timeless yet fresh,
Of being bold and authentic.
We learned, by listening, what gives words their power.—
Manhood to support them, steady as a star;
His voice fired up our cannon, sharpened our swords,
And made our guests shout; cover and sail I heard him and tensed; the sails heard and beckoned. The winds in a better mood.
In our darkest moments, he took charge of our weapons again;
Replenished ourselves from his own source of masculinity; Pride, honor, and country pulsed through all his effort; Shall we give praise? God's praise was His before; And he looks down on our pointless achievements; Our bravest champion.

THE CHIMNEY-CORNER.

I.

Here comes the First of January, Eighteen Hundred and Sixty-Five, and we are all settled comfortably into our winter places, with our winter surroundings and belongings; all cracks and openings are calked and listed, the double windows are in, the furnace dragon in the cellar is ruddy and in good liking, sending up his warming respirations through every pipe and register in the house; and yet, though an artificial summer reigns everywhere, like bees, we have our swarming-place,—in my library. There is my chimney-corner, and my table permanently established on one side of the hearth; and each of the female genus has, so to speak, pitched her own winter-tent within sight of the blaze of my camp-fire. I discerned to-day that Jennie had surreptitiously appropriated one of the drawers of my study-table to knitting-needles and worsted; and wicker work-baskets and stands of various heights and sizes seem to be planted here and there for permanence among the bookcases. The canary-bird has a sunny window, and the plants spread out their leaves and unfold their blossoms as if there were no ice and snow in the street, and Rover makes a hearth-rug of himself in winking satisfaction in front of my fire, except when Jennie is taken with a fit of discipline, when he beats a retreat, and secretes himself under my table.

Here comes January 1st, 1865, and we’re all comfortably settled into our winter spots, surrounded by our winter stuff. All the cracks and openings are sealed, the double windows are in place, and the furnace in the cellar is warm and happily sending heat through every pipe and vent in the house. Even though an artificial summer fills the space, just like bees, we've gathered in my library. There's my cozy spot by the chimney, and my table set up permanently on one side of the hearth; each of the women has, so to speak, set up her own winter tent within view of my campfire. Today, I noticed that Jennie had sneakily claimed one of the drawers of my study table for her knitting needles and yarn; various wicker baskets and stands have appeared among the bookcases for good. The canary has a sunny window, and the plants are unfurling their leaves and blooming as if there's no ice and snow outside, while Rover makes a cozy rug of himself in front of my fire, looking satisfied, except when Jennie gets strict, then he makes a quick exit and hides under my table.

Peaceable, ah, how peaceable, home and quiet and warmth in winter! And how, when we hear the wind whistle, we think of you, O our brave brothers, our saviours and defenders, who for our sake have no home but the muddy camp, the hard pillow of the barrack, the weary march, the uncertain fare,—you, the rank and file, the thousand unnoticed ones, who have left warm fires, dear wives, loving little children, without even the hope of glory or fame,—without even the hope of doing anything remarkable or perceptible for the cause you love,—resigned only to fill the ditch or bridge the chasm over which your country shall walk to peace and joy! Good men and true, brave unknown hearts, we salute you, and feel that we, in our soft peace and security, are not worthy of you! When we think of you, our simple comforts seem luxuries all too good for us, who give so little when you give all!

Peaceful, oh, how peaceful, home and quiet and warmth in winter! And how, when we hear the wind whistle, we think of you, our brave brothers, our saviors and defenders, who for our sake have no home but the muddy camp, the hard bed in the barracks, the weary march, the unpredictable food,—you, the rank and file, the thousands of unnoticed ones, who have left warm fires, dear wives, loving little children, without even the hope of glory or fame,—without even the hope of doing anything remarkable or noticeable for the cause you love,—resigned only to fill the ditch or bridge the gap over which your country shall walk to peace and joy! Good men and true, brave unknown hearts, we salute you, and feel that we, in our soft peace and security, are not worthy of you! When we think of you, our simple comforts seem like luxuries that are too good for us, who give so little when you give everything!

But there are others to whom from our bright homes, our cheerful firesides, we would fain say a word, if we dared.

But there are others whom, from our cozy homes and warm firesides, we would love to say a word to, if we had the courage.

Think of a mother receiving a letter with such a passage as this in it! It is extracted from one we have just seen, written by a private in the army of Sheridan, describing the death of a private. "He fell instantly, gave a peculiar smile and look, and then closed his eyes. We laid him down gently at the foot of a large tree. I crossed his hands over his breast, closed his eyelids down, but the smile was still on his face. I wrapped him in his tent, spread my pocket-handkerchief over his face, wrote his name on a piece of paper, and pinned it on his breast, and there we left him: we could not find pick or shovel to dig a grave." There it is!—a history that is multiplying itself by hundreds daily, the substance of what has come to so many homes, and must come to so many more before the great price of our ransom is paid!

Think about a mother getting a letter that includes a passage like this! It's taken from one we just read, written by a soldier in Sheridan's army, describing the death of another soldier. "He fell instantly, gave a strange smile and look, and then closed his eyes. We carefully laid him down at the base of a big tree. I crossed his hands over his chest, closed his eyelids, but the smile was still on his face. I wrapped him in his tent, spread my handkerchief over his face, wrote his name on a piece of paper, and pinned it to his chest, and there we left him: we couldn't find a shovel to dig a grave." There it is!—a story that's being repeated hundreds of times every day, the reality of what has entered so many homes, and must reach so many more before the high cost of our freedom is paid!

What can we say to you, in those many, many homes where the light has gone out forever?—you, O fathers, mothers, wives, sisters, haunted by a name that has ceased to be spoken on earth,—you, for whom there is no more news from the camp, no more reading of lists, no more tracing of maps, no more letters, but only a blank, dead silence! The battle-cry goes on,[Pg 110] but for you it is passed by! the victory comes, but, oh, never more to bring him back to you! your offering to this great cause has been made, and been taken; you have thrown into it all your living, even all that you had, and from henceforth your house is left unto you desolate! O ye watchers of the cross, ye waiters by the sepulchre, what can be said to you? We could almost extinguish our own home-fires, that seem too bright when we think of your darkness; the laugh dies on our lip, the lamp burns dim through our tears, and we seem scarcely worthy to speak words of comfort, lest we seem as those who mock a grief they cannot know.

What can we say to you, in those countless homes where the light has gone out forever?—you, fathers, mothers, wives, sisters, haunted by a name that is no longer heard on earth,—you, for whom there’s no more news from the camp, no more reading of lists, no more tracing of maps, no more letters, just a blank, dead silence! The battle-cry continues, [Pg 110] but for you it has passed by! The victory comes, but, oh, it will never bring him back to you! Your sacrifice for this great cause has been made and received; you have given all your life, even everything you had, and from now on your home is left desolate! O you watchers of the cross, you who wait by the graveside, what can be said to you? We could almost snuff out our own home-fires, which seem too bright when we think of your darkness; the laughter dies on our lips, the lamp burns dim through our tears, and we feel hardly worthy to offer words of comfort, lest we come across as those who mock a grief they cannot truly understand.

But is there no consolation? Is it nothing to have had such a treasure to give, and to have given it freely for the noblest cause for which ever battle was set,—for the salvation of your country, for the freedom of all mankind? Had he died a fruitless death, in the track of common life, blasted by fever, smitten or rent by crushing accident, then might his most precious life seem to be as water spilled upon the ground; but now it has been given for a cause and a purpose worthy even the anguish of your loss and sacrifice. He has been counted worthy to be numbered with those who stood with precious incense between the living and the dead, that the plague which was consuming us might be stayed. The blood of these young martyrs shall be the seed of the future church of liberty, and from every drop shall spring up flowers of healing. O widow! O mother! blessed among bereaved women! there remains to you a treasure that belongs not to those who have lost in any other wise,—the power to say, "He died for his country." In all the good that comes of this anguish you shall have a right and share by virtue of this sacrifice. The joy of freedmen bursting from chains, the glory of a nation new-born, the assurance of a triumphant future for your country and the world,—all these become yours by the purchase-money of that precious blood.

But isn't there some comfort? Isn't it something to have had such a treasure to give, and to have given it freely for the noblest cause of all— for the salvation of your country and the freedom of humankind? If he had died a useless death, just going through life, wasted by fever or struck down by a terrible accident, then his most precious life might seem like water spilled on the ground; but now it has been given for a cause and a purpose worthy of even the pain of your loss and sacrifice. He has been honored to be counted among those who stood with priceless offerings between the living and the dead to stop the plague that was destroying us. The blood of these young martyrs will be the seed of the future church of liberty, and from every drop will grow flowers of healing. Oh widow! Oh mother! blessed among grieving women! you have a treasure that those who suffer loss in other ways do not have—the ability to say, "He died for his country." In all the good that comes from this pain, you will have a rightful share because of this sacrifice. The joy of the freed, breaking free from chains, the glory of a newly born nation, the promise of a triumphant future for your country and the world—all these become yours through the price of that precious blood.

Besides this, there are other treasures that come through sorrow, and sorrow alone. There are celestial plants of root so long and so deep that the land must be torn and furrowed, ploughed up from the very foundation, before they can strike and flourish; and when we see how God's plough is driving backward and forward and across this nation, rending, tearing up tender shoots, and burying soft wild-flowers, we ask ourselves, What is He going to plant?

Besides this, there are other treasures that come from sorrow, and sorrow alone. There are heavenly plants with roots so long and deep that the land must be torn up and plowed from the very foundation before they can take hold and thrive; and when we see how God’s plow is moving back and forth across this nation, ripping up tender sprouts and burying soft wildflowers, we ask ourselves, What is He going to plant?

Not the first year, nor the second, after the ground has been broken up, does the purpose of the husbandman appear. At first we see only what is uprooted and ploughed in,—the daisy drabbled, and the violet crushed,—and the first trees planted amid the unsightly furrows stand dumb and disconsolate, irresolute in leaf, and without flower or fruit. Their work is under the ground. In darkness and silence they are putting forth long fibres, searching hither and thither under the black soil for the strength that years hence shall burst into bloom and bearing.

Not in the first year, nor the second, after the ground has been turned over, does the farmer’s intention become clear. At first, we only see what has been uprooted and plowed in—the daisy trampled and the violet crushed—and the newly planted trees among the ugly furrows stand silent and forlorn, uncertain in their leaves and lacking flowers or fruit. Their work is happening below the surface. In darkness and silence, they are extending long roots, searching here and there beneath the dark soil for the strength that will eventually lead to blossoms and fruit in the years to come.

What is true of nations is true of individuals. It may seem now winter and desolation with you. Your hearts have been ploughed and harrowed and are now frozen up. There is not a flower left, not a blade of grass, not a bird to sing,—and it is hard to believe that any brighter flowers, any greener herbage, shall spring up, than those which have been torn away: and yet there will. Nature herself teaches you to-day. Out-doors nothing but bare branches and shrouding snow; and yet you know that there is not a tree that is not patiently holding out at the end of its boughs next year's buds, frozen indeed, but unkilled. The rhododendron and the lilac have their blossoms all ready, wrapped in cere-cloth, waiting in patient faith. Under the frozen ground the crocus and the hyacinth and the tulip hide in their hearts the perfect forms of future flowers. And it is even so with you: your leaf-buds of the future are frozen, but not killed; the soil of your heart has many flowers under it cold and still now, but they will yet come up and bloom.[Pg 111]

What is true for nations is true for individuals. It may feel like winter and desolation for you right now. Your hearts have been plowed and harrowed and are now frozen. There’s not a flower left, not a blade of grass, not a bird singing—and it’s hard to believe that any brighter flowers or greener grass will grow back, even after what’s been taken away: but they will. Nature itself teaches you that today. Outside, there are only bare branches and covering snow; yet you know that not a single tree isn’t patiently holding the buds for next year at the tips of its branches, frozen but not dead. The rhododendron and the lilac have their blossoms all ready, wrapped in protective layers, waiting patiently in faith. Beneath the frozen ground, the crocus, hyacinth, and tulip are hiding the perfect shapes of future flowers in their hearts. And it’s just like that with you: your future leaf buds may be frozen, but they aren’t dead; the soil of your heart has many flowers beneath it, cold and still for now, but they will eventually come up and bloom.[Pg 111]

The dear old book of comfort tells of no present healing for sorrow. No chastening for the present seemeth joyous, but grievous, but afterwards it yieldeth peaceable fruits of righteousness. We, as individuals, as a nation, need to have faith in that afterwards. It is sure to come,—sure as spring and summer to follow winter.

The beloved old book of comfort says there's no immediate cure for sorrow. No discipline right now feels happy; it feels painful, but afterwards, it produces a peaceful harvest of goodness. We, as individuals and as a nation, need to have faith in that afterward. It's certain to come—just as spring and summer are sure to follow winter.

There is a certain amount of suffering which must follow the rending of the great chords of life, suffering which is natural and inevitable; it cannot be argued down; it cannot be stilled; it can no more be soothed by any effort of faith and reason than the pain of a fractured limb, or the agony of fire on the living flesh. All that we can do is to brace ourselves to bear it, calling on God, as the martyrs did in the fire, and resigning ourselves to let it burn on. We must be willing to suffer, since God so wills. There are just so many waves to go over us, just so many arrows of stinging thought to be shot into our soul, just so many faintings and sinkings and revivings only to suffer again, belonging to and inherent in our portion of sorrow; and there is a work of healing that God has placed in the hands of Time alone.

There’s a certain level of suffering that comes from the breaking of life’s deep connections, suffering that is natural and unavoidable; it can’t be argued away; it can’t be quieted; it can’t be eased by any amount of faith or logic any more than the pain of a broken bone or the torment of fire on living skin. All we can do is prepare ourselves to endure it, calling on God, just as the martyrs did in the flames, and accepting that we must let it continue. We have to be ready to suffer, since it’s part of God’s plan. There are only so many waves that will crash over us, only so many arrows of sharp thoughts aimed at our souls, only so many moments of weakness, collapse, and revival, only to endure suffering again, all belonging to and part of our share of sorrow; and there is a healing process that God has placed solely in the hands of Time.

Time heals all things at last; yet it depends much on us in our suffering, whether time shall send us forth healed, indeed, but maimed and crippled and callous, or whether, looking to the great Physician of sorrows, and coworking with him, we come forth stronger and fairer even for our wounds.

Time eventually heals everything; however, it largely depends on us during our suffering. Whether time leaves us healed but scarred and hardened, or whether we look to the great Healer of our sorrows and work alongside Him, ultimately determines if we emerge stronger and more beautiful even with our wounds.

We call ourselves a Christian people, and the peculiarity of Christianity is that it is a worship and doctrine of sorrow. The five wounds of Jesus, the instruments of the passion, the cross, the sepulchre,—these are its emblems and watchwords. In thousands of churches, amid gold and gems and altars fragrant with perfume, are seen the crown of thorns, the nails, the spear, the cup of vinegar mingled with gall, the sponge that could not slake that burning death-thirst; and in a voice choked with anguish the Church in many lands and divers tongues prays from age to age,—"By thine agony and bloody sweat, by thy cross and passion, by thy precious death and burial!"—mighty words of comfort, whose meaning reveals itself only to souls fainting in the cold death-sweat of mortal anguish! They tell all Christians that by uttermost distress alone was the Captain of their salvation made perfect as a Saviour.

We identify as a Christian community, and the unique aspect of Christianity is that it centers on worship and the doctrine of sorrow. The five wounds of Jesus, the instruments of his suffering, the cross, and the tomb—these are its symbols and rallying cries. In thousands of churches, surrounded by gold, gems, and altars filled with sweet fragrances, you can find the crown of thorns, the nails, the spear, the cup of vinegar mixed with gall, and the sponge that couldn't quench that overwhelming thirst of death; and in a voice filled with pain, the Church in many places and languages prays through the ages—"By your agony and bloody sweat, by your cross and suffering, by your precious death and burial!"—powerful words of comfort, whose true meaning only becomes clear to souls struggling in the deep agony of mortal suffering! They remind all Christians that it was only through ultimate distress that the Captain of their salvation was perfected as a Savior.

Sorrow brings us into the true unity of the Church,—that unity which underlies all external creeds, and unites all hearts that have suffered deeply enough to know that when sorrow is at its utmost there is but one kind of sorrow, and but one remedy. What matter, in extremis, whether we be called Romanist, or Protestant, or Greek, or Calvinist?

Sorrow brings us into the true unity of the Church—that unity which goes beyond all external beliefs and connects all hearts that have suffered deeply enough to realize that when sorrow reaches its peak, there is only one true sorrow and one solution. What does it matter, in extremis, whether we are called Roman Catholic, Protestant, Greek Orthodox, or Calvinist?

We suffer, and Christ suffered; we die, and Christ died; he conquered suffering and death, he rose and lives and reigns,—and we shall conquer, rise, live, and reign; the hours on the cross were long, the thirst was bitter, the darkness and horror real,—but they ended. After the wail, "My God, why hast thou forsaken me?" came the calm, "It is finished"; pledge to us all that our "It is finished" shall come also.

We suffer, and Christ suffered; we die, and Christ died; he overcame suffering and death, he rose and lives and reigns,—and we will overcome, rise, live, and reign; the hours on the cross were long, the thirst was bitter, the darkness and horror were real,—but they ended. After the cry, "My God, why have you abandoned me?" came the calm, "It is finished"; a promise to us all that our "It is finished" will come too.

Christ arose, fresh, joyous, no more to die; and it is written, that, when the disciples were gathered together in fear and sorrow, he stood in the midst of them, and showed unto them his hands and his side; and then were they glad. Already had the healed wounds of Jesus become pledges of consolation to innumerable thousands; and those who, like Christ, have suffered the weary struggles, the dim horrors of the cross,—who have lain, like him, cold and chilled in the hopeless sepulchre,—if his spirit wakes them to life, shall come forth with healing power for others who have suffered and are suffering.

Christ rose, refreshed and joyful, never to die again; and it’s written that when the disciples gathered together in fear and sadness, he stood among them and showed his hands and his side; and then they were filled with joy. Already, the healed wounds of Jesus had become sources of comfort for countless thousands; and those who, like Christ, have endured the exhausting struggles and the dark horrors of the cross,—who have lain, like him, cold and alone in the hopeless tomb,—if his spirit brings them back to life, will emerge with healing power for others who have suffered and are suffering.

Count the good and beautiful ministrations that have been wrought in this world of need and labor, and how many of them have been wrought by hands wounded and scarred, by hearts that had scarcely ceased to bleed!

Count the good and beautiful acts that have been done in this world of need and hard work, and how many of them have been done by hands that are wounded and scarred, by hearts that have barely stopped bleeding!

How many priests of consolation is[Pg 112] God now ordaining by the fiery imposition of sorrow! how many Sisters of the Bleeding Heart, Daughters of Mercy, Sisters of Charity, are receiving their first vocation in tears and blood!

How many priests of comfort is[Pg 112] God now ordaining through the intense experience of sorrow! How many Sisters of the Bleeding Heart, Daughters of Mercy, Sisters of Charity, are starting their journey in tears and blood!

The report of every battle strikes into some home; and heads fall low, and hearts are shattered, and only God sees the joy that is set before them, and that shall come out of their sorrow. He sees our morning at the same moment that He sees our night,—sees us comforted, healed, risen to a higher life, at the same moment that He sees us crushed and broken in the dust; and so, though tenderer than we, He bears our great sorrows for the joy that is set before us.

The news of every battle hits home; people mourn, and hearts are broken, while only God sees the joy waiting for them that will emerge from their sadness. He sees our mornings as He sees our nights—witnessing us comforted, healed, and lifted to a better life at the same time He sees us crushed and broken in the dirt; and so, even though He is more compassionate than we are, He takes on our deep sorrows for the joy that lies ahead.

After the Napoleonic wars had desolated Europe, the country was, like all countries after war, full of shattered households, of widows and orphans and homeless wanderers. A nobleman of Silesia, the Baron von Kottwitz, who had lost his wife and all his family in the reverses and sorrows of the times, found himself alone in the world, which looked more dreary and miserable through the multiplying lenses of his own tears. But he was one of those whose heart had been quickened in its death anguish by the resurrection voice of Christ; and he came forth to life and comfort. He bravely resolved to do all that one man could to lessen the great sum of misery. He sold his estates in Silesia, bought in Berlin a large building that had been used as barracks for the soldiers, and, fitting it up in plain commodious apartments, formed there a great family-establishment, into which he received the wrecks and fragments of families that had been broken up by the war,—orphan children, widowed and helpless women, decrepit old people, disabled soldiers. These he mad his family, and constituted himself their father and chief. He above with them, and cared for them as a parent. He had schools for the children; the more advanced he put to trades and employments; he set up a hospital for the sick; and for all he had the priestly ministrations of his own Christ-like heart. The celebrated Professor Tholuck, one of the most learned men of modern Germany, was an early protégé of the old Baron's, who, discerning his talents, put him in the way of a liberal education. In his earlier years, like many others of the young who play with life, ignorant of its needs, Tholuck piqued himself on a lordly skepticism with regard to the commonly received Christianity, and even wrote an essay to prove the superiority of the Mohammedan to the Christian religion. In speaking of his conversion, he says,—"What moved me was no argument, nor any spoken reproof, but simply that divine image of the old Baron walking before my soul. That life was an argument always present to me, and which I never could answer; and so I became a Christian." In the life of this man we see the victory over sorrow. How many with means like his, when desolated by like bereavements, have lain coldly and idly gazing on the miseries of life, and weaving around themselves icy tissues of doubt and despair,—doubting the being of a God, doubting the reality of a Providence, doubting the divine love, embittered and rebellious against the power which they could not resist, yet to which they would not submit! In such a chill heart-freeze lies the danger of sorrow. And it is a mortal danger. It is a torpor that must be resisted, as the man in the whirling snows must bestir himself, or he will perish. The apathy of melancholy must be broken by an effort of religion and duty. The stagnant blood must be made to flow by active work, and the cold hand warmed by clasping the hands outstretched towards it in sympathy or supplication. One orphan child taken in, to be fed, clothed, and nurtured, may save a heart from freezing to death: and God knows this war is making but too many orphans!

After the Napoleonic wars devastated Europe, like all countries after a war, the scene was filled with broken homes, widows, orphans, and homeless wanderers. A nobleman from Silesia, Baron von Kottwitz, who had lost his wife and entire family to the hardships of the times, found himself alone in a world that seemed even bleaker and more miserable through his own tears. However, he was one of those whose heart had been revived from its sorrow by the uplifting voice of Christ; he emerged into life and hope. He courageously decided to do everything he could to reduce the immense suffering around him. He sold his lands in Silesia, purchased a large building in Berlin that had been used as barracks for soldiers, and transformed it into simple but comfortable apartments, creating a big family establishment where he welcomed the remnants of families shattered by war— orphans, widowed and helpless women, frail elderly people, and disabled soldiers. He embraced them as his family, appointing himself as their father and chief. He lived with them and cared for them like a parent. He established schools for the children; he trained the older ones in trades and jobs; he set up a hospital for the sick; and he offered everyone the nurturing care of his own Christ-like heart. The renowned Professor Tholuck, one of the most learned individuals in modern Germany, was an early protégé of the old Baron. Recognizing his talents, the Baron guided him towards a quality education. In his youth, like many young people who take life lightly and are unaware of its demands, Tholuck prided himself on a haughty skepticism towards commonly accepted Christianity and even wrote an essay arguing that the Muslim faith was superior to Christianity. Reflecting on his conversion, he said, "What moved me was not any argument or spoken rebuke, but simply the divine image of the old Baron walking before my soul. That life was a constant, unanswerable argument for me; and that’s how I became a Christian." In this man's life, we see triumph over sorrow. How many people with his means, when faced with similar losses, have remained coldly and passively watching the hardships of life, wrapping themselves in layers of doubt and despair—doubting the existence of God, questioning the reality of Providence, resenting divine love, feeling embittered and rebellious against a power they could not resist, yet refused to submit to? This chilling freeze of the heart poses a real danger in times of sorrow. It is a deadly peril. It is a numbness that needs to be resisted, just as a person caught in a blizzard must move or they will perish. The stifled feeling of melancholy must be shattered through an act of faith and duty. The stagnant blood must be revitalized through active work, and the cold hand must be warmed by reaching out to clasp the hands extended towards it in sympathy or plea. Taking in just one orphan child to feed, clothe, and nurture may be enough to save a heart from freezing to death: and God knows this war is creating far too many orphans!

It is easy to subscribe to an orphan asylum, and go on in one's despair and loneliness. Such ministries may do good to the children who are thereby saved from the street, but they impart little warmth and comfort to the giver. One destitute child housed, taught, cared[Pg 113] for, and tended personally, will bring more solace to a suffering heart than a dozen maintained in an asylum. Not that the child will probably prove an angel, or even an uncommonly interesting mortal. It is a prosaic work, this bringing-up of children, and there can be little rosewater in it. The child may not appreciate what is done for him, may not be particularly grateful, may have disagreeable faults, and continue to have them after much pains on your part to eradicate them,—and yet it is a fact, that to redeem one human being from destitution and ruin, even in some homely every-day course of ministrations, is one of the best possible tonics and alteratives to a sick and wounded spirit.

It's easy to donate to an orphanage and continue feeling hopeless and alone. While these efforts may help the kids who are saved from the streets, they don't offer much warmth or comfort to the person giving. Helping just one needy child by providing shelter, education, and care will bring more peace to a hurting soul than supporting a dozen in an institution. It's not that the child will likely be an angel or even exceptionally interesting. Raising children is pretty mundane, and there's hardly anything glamorous about it. The child might not recognize or appreciate what you're doing for them, might not be especially grateful, might have irritating flaws, and these flaws may persist even after you try hard to correct them. Yet, the truth is that rescuing one person from poverty and despair, even through simple daily acts of care, can be one of the best remedies for a troubled spirit.

But this is not the only avenue to beneficence which the war opens. We need but name the service of hospitals, the care and education of the freedmen,—for these are charities that have long been before the eyes of the community, and have employed thousands of busy hands: thousands of sick and dying beds to tend, a race to be educated, civilized, and Christianized, surely were work enough for one age; and yet this is not all. War shatters everything, and it is hard to say what in society will not need rebuilding and binding up and strengthening anew. Not the least of the evils of war are the vices which a great army engenders wherever it moves,—vices peculiar to military life, as others are peculiar to peace. The poor soldier perils for us not merely his body, but his soul. He leads a life of harassing and exhausting toil and privation, of violent strain on the nervous energies, alternating with sudden collapse, creating a craving for stimulants, and endangering the formation of fatal habits. What furies and harpies are those that follow the army, and that seek out the soldier in his tent, far from home, mother, wife, and sister, tired, disheartened, and tempt him to forget his troubles in a momentary exhilaration, that burns only to chill and to destroy! Evil angels are always active and indefatigable, and there must be good angels enlisted to face them; and here is employment for the slack hand of grief. Ah, we have known mothers bereft of sons in this war, who have seemed at once to open wide their hearts, and to become mothers to every brave soldier in the field. They have lived only to work,—and in place of one lost, their sons have been counted by thousands.

But this isn't the only way the war creates opportunities for kindness. We only need to mention the role of hospitals, the care and education of freedmen—these are causes that have long been on the community's radar and have employed thousands of hardworking people: thousands of sick and dying individuals to care for, a race to be educated, civilized, and Christianized; surely that's plenty for one era. Yet there's more. War disrupts everything, and it's hard to pin down what in society won't need to be rebuilt, repaired, and strengthened again. One of the biggest issues brought on by war is the negative behaviors that a large army creates wherever it goes—behaviors unique to military life, just as there are others unique to peace. The poor soldier risks not just his body but his soul for us. He endures a life of stressful, exhausting labor and deprivation, with intense pressure on his nerves, followed by sudden breakdowns, leading to cravings for stimulants and risking the development of harmful habits. What monsters and temptations follow the army and seek out the soldier in his tent, far from home, mother, wife, and sister, exhausted, discouraged, and tempting him to escape his troubles through fleeting highs that only leave him empty and destroyed! Evil forces are always active and tireless, and we need good forces at the ready to combat them; and here lies work for the grieving heart. We've seen mothers who have lost sons in this war, who seem to open their hearts wide and become mothers to every brave soldier out in the field. They live only to serve—and instead of one lost child, they count their sons by the thousands.

And not least of all the fields for exertion and Christian charity opened by this war is that presented by womanhood. The war is abstracting from the community its protecting and sheltering elements, and leaving the helpless and dependent in vast disproportion. For years to come, the average of lone women will be largely increased; and the demand, always great, for some means by which they may provide for themselves, in the rude jostle of the world, will become more urgent and imperative.

And one of the most important areas for effort and Christian kindness exposed by this war is that related to women. The war is taking away the community's protective and supportive elements, leaving the helpless and dependent in a much greater imbalance. For years to come, the number of single women will significantly rise; and the ongoing demand for ways they can support themselves in the harsh realities of life will become more urgent and necessary.

Will any one sit pining away in inert grief, when two streets off are the midnight dance-houses, where girls of twelve, thirteen, and fourteen are being lured into the way of swift destruction? How many of these are daughters of soldiers who have given their hearts' blood for us and our liberties!

Will anyone sit around wasting away in sadness when just two streets over are the midnight dance clubs, where girls as young as twelve, thirteen, and fourteen are being enticed into a path of quick ruin? How many of them are daughters of soldiers who have sacrificed their lives for us and our freedoms!

Two noble women of the Society of Friends have lately been taking the gauge of suffering and misery in our land, visiting the hospitals at every accessible point, pausing in our great cities, and going in their purity to those midnight orgies where mere children are being trained for a life of vice and infamy. They have talked with these poor bewildered souls, entangled in toils as terrible and inexorable as those of the slave-market, and many of whom are frightened and distressed at the life they are beginning to lead, and earnestly looking for the means of escape. In the judgment of these holy women, at least one third of those with whom they have talked are children so recently entrapped, and so capable of reformation, that there would be the greatest hope in efforts for their salvation. While such things are to be done in our land, is there any reason why any one should[Pg 114] die of grief? One soul redeemed will do more to lift the burden of sorrow than all the blandishments and diversions of art, all the alleviations of luxury, all the sympathy of friends.

Two noble women from the Society of Friends have recently been measuring the suffering and misery in our country, visiting hospitals at every possible location, stopping in major cities, and going into those dark places where innocent children are being prepared for lives of vice and disgrace. They have spoken with these confused young people, trapped in situations as horrifying and relentless as those of the slave market, many of whom are scared and troubled by the lives they’re starting to lead and are desperately searching for a way out. According to these dedicated women, at least a third of those they've spoken with are children who have recently been ensnared and are still capable of change, providing great hope for efforts aimed at their rescue. With such critical work to be done in our country, is there any reason for anyone to[Pg 114] die of sorrow? Saving even one soul will do more to alleviate the weight of grief than all the comforts and distractions of art, all the indulgences of luxury, and all the compassion from friends.

In the Roman Catholic Church there is an order of women called the Sisters of the Good Shepherd, who have renounced the world to devote themselves, their talents and property, entirely to the work of seeking out and saving the fallen of their own sex; and the wonders worked by their self-denying love on the hearts and lives of even the most depraved are credible only to those who know that the Good Shepherd Himself ever lives and works with such spirits engaged in such a work. A similar order of women exists in New York, under the direction of the Episcopal Church, in connection with St. Luke's Hospital; and another in England, who tend the "House of Mercy" of Clewer.

In the Roman Catholic Church, there’s a group of women known as the Sisters of the Good Shepherd, who have given up worldly life to dedicate themselves, their skills, and their resources entirely to helping reclaim and uplift women in need. The amazing impact of their selfless love on the hearts and lives of even the most troubled individuals is something only those who understand that the Good Shepherd is always present and working alongside such devoted spirits can truly appreciate. A similar group of women exists in New York, operating under the Episcopal Church in association with St. Luke's Hospital, and another in England, caring for the "House of Mercy" in Clewer.

Such benevolent associations offer objects of interest to that class which most needs something to fill the void made by bereavement. The wounds of grief are less apt to find a cure in that rank of life where the sufferer has wealth and leisure. The poor widow, whose husband was her all, must break the paralysis of grief. The hard necessities of life are her physicians; they send her out to unwelcome, yet friendly toil, which, hard as it seems, has yet its healing power. But the sufferer surrounded by the appliances of wealth and luxury may long indulge the baleful apathy, and remain in the damp shadows of the valley of death till strength and health are irrecoverably lost. How Christ-like is the thought of a woman, graceful, elegant, cultivated, refined, whose voice has been trained to melody, whose fingers can make sweet harmony with every touch, whose pencil and whose needle can awake the beautiful creations of art, devoting all these powers to the work of charming back to the sheepfold those wandering and bewildered lambs whom the Good Shepherd still calls his own! Jenny Lind, once, when she sang at a concert for destitute children, exclaimed in her enthusiasm, "Is it not beautiful that I can sing so?" And so may not every woman feel, when her graces and accomplishments draw the wanderer, and charm away evil demons, and soothe the sore and sickened spirit, and make the Christian fold more attractive than the dizzy gardens of false pleasure?

Such kind-hearted groups provide things of interest for those who really need something to fill the emptiness left by loss. The wounds of grief are less likely to heal for those who have wealth and free time. The poor widow, whose husband meant everything to her, must overcome the paralysis of grief. The harsh realities of life are her healers; they push her into labor that, while unwelcome, can still be therapeutic. But someone surrounded by wealth and luxury may continue to wallow in harmful indifference, lingering in the dark shadows of despair until strength and health are permanently lost. How Christ-like is the idea of a woman, graceful, elegant, cultured, and refined, whose voice is like music, whose touch creates sweet harmony, and whose artistic talents can inspire beautiful works, dedicating all her gifts to the mission of bringing back the lost and confused souls whom the Good Shepherd continues to call his own! Once, Jenny Lind, when she performed at a concert for needy children, excitedly exclaimed, "Isn’t it beautiful that I can sing this way?" And shouldn't every woman feel that way when her talents and charm attract the lost, cast away negativity, comfort the weary spirit, and make the Christian community more appealing than the tempting but false pleasures of the world?

In such associations, and others of kindred nature, how many of the stricken and bereaved women of our country might find at once a home and an object in life! Motherless hearts might be made glad in a better and higher motherhood; and the stock of earthly life that seemed cut off at the root, and dead past recovery, may be grafted upon with a shoot from the tree of life which is in the Paradise of God.

In these groups, and others like them, how many of the grieving and mourning women in our country could find both a home and a purpose in life! Motherless hearts could find joy in a more fulfilling and nurturing motherhood; and the lives that seemed to be cut off and hopeless could be revived with a new beginning from the tree of life in God's Paradise.

So the beginning of this eventful 1865, which finds us still treading the wine-press of our great conflict, should bring with it a serene and solemn hope, a joy such as those had with whom in the midst of the fiery furnace there walked one like unto the Son of God.

So the start of this significant year of 1865, which has us still facing the intense struggles of our great conflict, should bring a calm and serious hope, a joy similar to that of those who, in the midst of the blazing furnace, were accompanied by someone resembling the Son of God.

The great affliction that has come upon our country is so evidently the purifying chastening of a Father, rather than the avenging anger of a Destroyer, that all hearts may submit themselves in a solemn and holy calm still to bear the burning that shall make us clean from dross and bring us forth to a higher national life. Never, in the whole course of our history, have such teachings of the pure abstract Right been so commended and forced upon us by Providence. Never have public men been so constrained to humble themselves before God, and to acknowledge that there is a Judge that ruleth in the earth. Verily His inquisition for blood has been strict and awful; and for every stricken household of the poor and lowly, hundreds of households of the oppressor have been scattered. The land where the family of the slave was first annihilated, and the negro, with all the loves and hopes of a man, was proclaimed to be a beast to be bred and sold in market[Pg 115] with the horse and the swine,—that land, with its fair name, Virginia, has been made a desolation so signal, so wonderful, that the blindest passer-by cannot but ask for what sin so awful a doom has been meted out. The prophetic visions of Nat Turner, who saw the leaves drop blood and the land darkened, have been fulfilled. The work of justice which he predicted is being executed to the uttermost.

The great suffering that has come upon our country is clearly more about the purifying discipline of a Father than the punishing wrath of a Destroyer, so everyone should submit themselves in a serious and holy calm to endure the pain that will cleanse us of impurities and elevate us to a better national life. Never in our entire history have the teachings of pure, abstract Right been so strongly endorsed and imposed on us by Providence. Public figures have never been so compelled to humble themselves before God and recognize that there is a Judge who governs the earth. Truly, His inquiry for justice has been strict and terrifying; for every affected household of the poor and humble, hundreds of households of the oppressors have been crushed. The land where the family of the slave was first destroyed, and the Black man, with all his loves and hopes, was declared to be a beast to be bred and sold in the market[Pg 115] alongside horses and pigs,—that land, with its once proud name, Virginia, has been transformed into such a profound desolation that even the most oblivious passerby cannot help but wonder what terrible sin has brought about such punishment. The prophetic visions of Nat Turner, who saw the leaves dripping with blood and the land shrouded in darkness, have come to pass. The work of justice he foresaw is being carried out completely.

But when this strange work of judgment and justice is consummated, when our country, through a thousand battles and ten thousands of precious deaths, shall have come forth from this long agony, redeemed and regenerated, then God Himself shall return and dwell with us, and the Lord God shall wipe away all tears from all faces, and the rebuke of His people shall He utterly take away.

But when this strange work of judgment and justice is complete, when our country, after countless battles and thousands of precious lives lost, has emerged from this long suffering, renewed and restored, then God Himself will return to be with us, and the Lord God will wipe away all tears from our faces, and He will completely remove the shame of His people.


GOD SAVE THE FLAG!

Washed in the blood of the brave and the thriving,
Taken from the altars of arrogant enemies,
Burning with star fires, yet never consuming,
Show off its wide ribbons of lily and rose.
The prophets of Baäl would tear it apart in vain,
His followers pray in vain for its downfall; Thousands have died for it, millions stand up for it,
Symbol of justice and mercy for everyone:
Justice that stains the sky with her horrors,
Mercy that comes with her gentle touch,
Calming all emotions, correcting all mistakes,
Sheathing the sword and breaking the chain.
Carried by the wave of past takeovers,
We sailed our Ark across the empty seas; This was the rainbow of hope for the nations,
Torn from the storm cloud and tossed to the wind!
God bless the Flag and its dedicated defenders.
As its wide folds flutter over the battlefield,
Until the dim star-wreath revives its brilliance,
Cleared of its stains in the blood of the brave!

ANNO DOMINI.

It is right and fitting that this nation should enter upon the new year with peculiar gratitude and thanksgiving to the Most High. Through all its existence it has rejoiced in the sunshine of divine favor; but never has that favor been so benignly and bountifully bestowed as in these latter days. For the unexampled material prosperity which has waited upon our steps,—for blessings in city and field, in basket and store, in all that we have set our hand unto, it is meet that we should render thanks to the Good Giver; but for the especial blessings of these last four years,—for the sudden uprising of manhood,—for the great revival of justice and truth and love, without which material prosperity is but a second death,—for the wisdom to do, the courage to dare, the patience to endure, and the godlike strength to sacrifice all in a righteous cause, let us give thanks to-day; for in these consists a people's life.

It’s appropriate and fitting for our nation to welcome the new year with special gratitude and thanks to the Most High. Throughout its existence, we have thrived in the light of divine favor, but never has that favor been so generously and abundantly given as it has in recent times. For the unprecedented material prosperity that has accompanied us—blessings in our cities and fields, in our homes and businesses, in everything we have worked for—it’s right for us to give thanks to the Good Giver; but for the specific blessings of these past four years—for the remarkable rise of manhood—for the revival of justice, truth, and love, without which material prosperity is merely a hollow victory—for the wisdom to act, the courage to take risks, the patience to endure, and the godlike strength to sacrifice everything for a righteous cause—let us give thanks today; for in these qualities lies a nation's true life.

To every nation there comes an hour whereon hang trembling the issues of its fate. Has it vitality to withstand the shock of conflict and the turmoil of surprise? Will it slowly gather itself up for victorious onset? or will it sink unresisting into darkness and the grave?

To every nation, there comes a moment that holds the uncertain fate of its future. Does it have the strength to endure the shock of conflict and the chaos of surprise? Will it slowly regroup for a triumphant comeback? Or will it fall, helpless, into darkness and oblivion?

To this nation, as to all, the question came: Ease or honor, death or life? Subtle and savage, with a bribe in his hand, and a threat on his tongue, the tempter stood. Let it be remembered with lasting gratitude that there was neither pause nor parley when once his purpose was revealed. The answer came,—the voice of millions like the voice of one. From city and village, from mountain and prairie, from the granite coast of the Atlantic to the golden gate of the Pacific, the answer came. It roared from a thousand cannon, it flashed from a million muskets. The sudden gleam of uplifted swords revealed it, the quiver of bristling bayonets wrote it in blood. A knell to the despot, a pæan to the slave, it thundered round the world.

To this nation, as to all, the question arose: Comfort or honor, death or life? Subtle and cruel, with a bribe in one hand and a threat on his tongue, the tempter stood. It should be remembered with lasting gratitude that there was no delay or negotiation once his intent was clear. The response came—the voice of millions like the voice of one. From cities and towns, from mountains and fields, from the rocky coast of the Atlantic to the golden gate of the Pacific, the answer came. It roared from a thousand cannons, it flashed from a million muskets. The sudden gleam of raised swords revealed it, the tremor of bristling bayonets wrote it in blood. A death knell for the despot, a celebration for the slave, it echoed around the world.

Then the thing which we had greatly feared came upon us, and that spectre which we had been afraid of came unto us, and, behold, length of days was in its right hand, and in its left hand riches and honor. What the lion-hearted warrior of England was to the children of the Saracens, that had the gaunt mystery of Secession been to the little ones of this generation, an evening phantom and a morning fear, at the mere mention of whose name many had been but too ready to fall at the feet of opposition and cry imploringly, "Take any form but that!" The phantom approached, put off its shadowy outlines, assumed a definite purpose, loomed up in horrid proportions,—to come to perpetual end. In its actual presence all fear vanished. The contest waxed hot, but it wanes forever. Shadow and substance drag slowly down their bloody path to disappear in eternal infamy. The war rolls on to its close; and when it closes, the foul blot of secession stains our historic page no more. Another book shall be opened.

Then what we had feared the most happened, and that ghost we were so scared of came to us, and, look, it held length of days in its right hand, and in its left hand were riches and honor. What the brave warrior of England was to the children of the Saracens, the haunting mystery of Secession was to the kids of this generation—an evening ghost and a morning dread, at the mere mention of whose name many were all too quick to kneel before the opposition and beg, "Take any form but that!" The ghost approached, shed its shadowy appearance, took on a clear purpose, and loomed large in terrifying size—to come to a definitive end. In its actual presence, all fear disappeared. The battle grew fierce, but it will fade away forever. Shadow and substance slowly dragged their bloody path to vanish into eternal shame. The war continues toward its conclusion; when it ends, the ugly stain of secession will no longer mark our historical record. Another book will be opened.

Remembering all the way which these battling years have led us, we can only say, "It is the Lord's, doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes." Who dreamed of the grand, stately patience, the heroic strength, that lay dormant in the hearts of this impulsive, mercurial people? It was always capable of magnanimity. Who suspected its sublime self-poise? Rioting in a reckless, childish freedom, who would have dared to prophesy that calm, clear foresight by which it voluntarily assumed the yoke, voiced all its strong individual wills in one central controlling will, and bent with haughty humility to every restraint that looked to the rescue of its endangered liberty? The cannon that smote the walls of Sumter did a wild work. Its voice of insult and of sacrilege roused the fire of a blood too brave to[Pg 117] know its courage, too proud to boast its source. All the heroism inherited from an honored ancestry, all the inborn wrath of justice against iniquity, all that was true to truth sprang up instinctively to wrest our Holy Land from the clutch of its worse than infidels.

Remembering the journey that these challenging years have taken us on, we can only say, "It's the Lord's doing, and it's amazing in our eyes." Who could have imagined the grand, steady patience and heroic strength that were hidden in the hearts of this impulsive, unpredictable people? It was always capable of greatness. Who realized its remarkable self-control? In a chaotic, carefree freedom, who would have dared to predict the calm, clear foresight with which it willingly took on the burden, unified its strong individual wills into one central guiding will, and humbled itself to every restriction that aimed to save its threatened liberty? The cannon that struck the walls of Sumter did a wild thing. Its voice of insult and sacrilege ignited a brave blood that was too courageous to know its strength and too proud to boast of its source. All the heroism inherited from a respected ancestry, all the natural anger for justice against wrongdoing, everything true sprang up instinctively to wrest our Holy Land from the grip of its worse than infidels.

But that was not the final test. The final test came afterwards. The passion of indignation flamed out as passion must. The war that had been welcomed as a relief bore down upon the land with an ever-increasing weight, became an ever-darkening shadow. Its romance and poetry did not fade out, but their colors were lost under the sable hues of reality. The cloud hung over every hamlet; it darkened every doorway. Even success must have been accompanied with sharpest sorrow; and we had not success to soften sorrow. Disaster followed close upon delay, and delay upon disaster, and still the nation's heart was strong. The cloud became a pall, but there was no faltering. Men said to one another, anxiously,—"This cannot last. We must have victory. The people will not stand these delays. The summer must achieve results, or all is lost." The summer came and went, results were not achieved, and still the patient country waited,—waited not supinely, not indifferently, but with a still determination, with a painful longing, with an eager endeavor, with a resolute will, less demonstrative, but no less definite, than that which Sumter roused. Moments of sadness, of gloom, of bitter disappointment and deep indignation there have been; but never from the first moment of the Rebellion to this its dying hour has there been a time when the purpose of the people to crush out treason and save the nation has for a single instant wavered. And never has their power lagged behind their purpose. Never have they withheld men or money, but always they have pressed on, more eager, more generous, more forward to give than their leaders have been to ask. Truly, it is not in man that walketh thus to direct his steps!

But that wasn’t the final test. The final test came later. The fire of anger burned out as passion does. The war, which had been seen as a relief, weighed down on the country with an increasing burden, becoming an ever-darkening presence. Its romanticism and poetry didn’t completely disappear, but their vibrancy faded under the grim reality. The shadow loomed over every village; it darkened every entrance. Even success must have been accompanied by the sharpest sorrow; and we had no success to soften our grief. Disaster closely followed delays, and delays followed disaster, yet the nation’s spirit remained strong. The shadow turned into a pall, but there was no hesitation. People said to one another, anxiously, “This can’t go on. We need victory. The public won’t tolerate these delays. The summer must bring results, or everything is lost.” The summer came and went, results weren’t achieved, and still the patient country waited—not passively, not indifferently, but with steady determination, painful longing, eager effort, and a firm resolve, less showy, but no less definite, than what Sumter ignited. There have been moments of sadness, gloom, bitter disappointment, and deep anger; but never, from the first moment of the Rebellion to its final hour, has the determination of the people to eliminate treason and save the nation wavered for even a second. And their power has never lagged behind their resolve. They have never held back men or money; rather, they have always pressed on, more eager, more generous, more willing to give than their leaders have been to ask. Truly, it is not in man to walk this way and direct his steps!

And side by side, with no unequal step, the great charities have attended the great conflict. Out of the strong has come forth sweetness. From the helmeted brow of War has sprung a fairer than Minerva, panoplied not for battle, but for the tenderest ministrations of Peace. Wherever the red hand of War has been raised to strike, there the white hand of Pity has been stretched forth to solace. Wherever else there may have been division, here there has been no division. Love, the essence of Christianity, self-sacrifice, the life of God, have forgotten their names, have left the beaten ways, have embodied themselves in institutions, and lifted the whole nation to the heights of a divine beneficence. Old and young, rich and poor, bond and free, have joined in offering an offering to the Lord in the persons of his wounded brethren. The woman that was tender and very delicate has brought her finest handiwork; the slave, whose just unmanacled hands were hardly yet deft enough to fashion a freedman's device, has proffered his painful hoards; the criminal in his cell has felt the mysterious brotherhood stirring in his heart, and has pressed his skill and cunning into the service of his countrymen. Hands trembling with age have steadied themselves to new effort; little fingers that had hardly learned their uses have bent with unwonted patience to the novelty of tasks. The fashion and elegance of great cities, the thrift and industry of rural villages, have combined to relieve the suffering and comfort the sorrowful. Science has wrought her mysteries, art has spread her beauties, and learning and eloquence and poetry have lavished their free-will offerings. The ancient blood of Massachusetts and the youthful vigor of California have throbbed high with one desire to give deserved meed to those heroic men who wear their badge of honor in scarred brow and maimed limb. The wonders of the Old World, the treasures of tropical seas, the boundless wealth of our own fertile inland, all that the present has of marvellous, all that the past has bequeathed[Pg 118] most precious,—all has been poured into the lap of this sweet charity, and blesseth alike him that gives and him that takes. It is the old convocation of the Jews, when they brought the Lord's offering to the work of the tabernacle of the congregation: "And they came, both men and women, and brought bracelets, and ear-rings, and rings, and tablets, all jewels of gold; and every man that offered offered an offering of gold unto the Lord. And every man with whom was found blue and purple and scarlet and fine linen and goats' hair and red skins of rams and badgers' skins brought them. And all the women that were wise-hearted did spin with their hands, and brought that which they had spun, both of blue and of purple and of scarlet and of fine linen. And the rulers brought onyx-stones, and stones to be set, and spice, and oil for the light. The children of Israel brought a willing offering unto the Lord, every man and woman."

And side by side, moving in perfect harmony, the great charities have accompanied the major conflict. From the strength of adversity has emerged a sweetness. From the helmeted head of War has come forth a figure more beautiful than Minerva, not armed for battle, but ready for the gentlest acts of Peace. Wherever the violent hand of War has been raised to strike, there the compassionate hand of Pity has reached out to comfort. While there may be division elsewhere, here there has been none. Love, the core of Christianity, selflessness, the essence of God, have transcended their identities, found new paths, transformed into institutions, and uplifted the entire nation to heights of divine kindness. Young and old, rich and poor, enslaved and free, have come together to offer gifts to the Lord through his wounded siblings. The delicate woman has provided her finest crafts; the recently freed slave, whose unshackled hands were still learning to create, has shared his meager savings; the prisoner has felt a profound sense of brotherhood in his heart and has contributed his skills for the sake of his fellow countrymen. Hands shaking with age have steadied themselves for new endeavors; tiny fingers that have barely learned their purpose have bent patiently to tackle unfamiliar tasks. The style and innovation of bustling cities, the thrift and perseverance of rural communities, have united to alleviate suffering and comfort the grieving. Science has performed its wonders, art has showcased its beauty, while education, eloquence, and poetry have generously contributed their offerings. The ancient lineage of Massachusetts and the youthful energy of California have pulsed with a shared desire to honor those heroic souls who bear their badge of sacrifice in scarred foreheads and wounded limbs. The marvels of the Old World, the riches of tropical seas, the endless bounty of our own fertile lands, everything remarkable in our present and all that the past has bestowed—[Pg 118] the most treasured—has been poured into the embrace of this sweet charity, blessing both the giver and the receiver. It is reminiscent of the ancient gathering of the Jews when they brought their offerings to support the work of the tabernacle: "And they came, both men and women, and brought bracelets, and earrings, and rings, and tablets, all jewels of gold; and every man that offered gave an offering of gold to the Lord. And every man who had blue and purple and scarlet and fine linen and goats' hair and red skins of rams and badgers' skins brought them. And all the wise-hearted women spun with their hands, and brought what they had spun, both of blue and purple and scarlet and fine linen. And the leaders brought onyx stones, and stones to be set, and spices, and oil for the light. The children of Israel brought a willing offering to the Lord, every man and woman."

Truly, not the least of the compensations of this war is the new spirit which it has set astir in human life, this acknowledged brotherhood which makes all things common, which moves health and wealth and leisure and learning to brave the dangers of the battle-field and the horrors of the hospital for the comfort of its needy comrade. And inasmuch as he who hath done it unto one of the least of these his brethren has done it unto the Master, is not this, in very deed and truth, Anno Domini, the Year of our Lord?

Honestly, one of the best things to come out of this war is the new spirit it has awakened in people’s lives, this recognized brotherhood that brings everyone together, inspiring health, wealth, leisure, and knowledge to face the dangers of the battlefield and the horrors of the hospital for the sake of their needy comrades. And since helping even the least among us is like helping the Master, isn’t this truly, indeed, the Year of our Lord?

And let all devout hearts render praises to God for the hope we are enabled to cherish that He will speedily save this people from their national sin. From the days of our fathers, the land groaned under its weight of woe and crime; but none saw from what quarter deliverance should come. Apostles and prophets arose in North and South, prophesying the wrath of God against a nation that dared to hold its great truth of human brotherhood in unrighteousness, and the smile of God only on him who should do justly and love mercy and walk humbly before Him; but they died in faith, not having obtained the promises. That faith in God, and consequently in the ultimate triumph of right over wrong, never failed; but few, even of the most sanguine, dared to hope that their eyes should see the salvation of the Lord. Upright men spent their lives in unyielding and indignant protest, not so much for any immediate result as because they could do no otherwise,—because the constant violation of sacred right, the constant defilement and degradation of country, wrought so fiercely and painfully in their hearts that they could not hold their peace. Though they expected no sudden reform, they believed in the indestructibility of truth, and knew, therefore, that their word should not return unto them void, but waited for some far future day when happier harvesters should come bringing their sheaves with them. How looks the promise now? A beneficent Providence has outstripped our laggard hopes. The work which we had so summarily given over to the wiser generations behind us is rapidly approaching completion beneath the strokes of a few sharp, short years of our own. Slavery, which was apologized for by the South, tolerated by the North, half recognized as an evil, half accepted as a compromise, but with every conscientious concession and every cowardly expedient sinking ever deeper and deeper into the nation's life, stands forth at last in its real character, and meets its righteous doom. Public opinion, rapidly sublimed in the white heat of this fierce war, is everywhere crystallizing. Men are learning to know precisely what they believe, and, knowing, dare maintain. There is no more speaking with bated breath, no more counselling of forbearance and non-intervention. It is no longer a chosen few who dare openly to denounce the sum of all villainies; but loud and long and deep goes up the execration of a people,—the tenfold hate and horror of men who have seen the foul fiend's work, who have felt his fangs fastened in their own flesh, his poison working[Pg 119] in their own hearts' blood. Hundreds of thousands of thinking men have gone down into his loathsome prison-house, have looked upon his obscene features, have grappled, shuddering, with his slimy strength; and thousands of thousands, watching them from far-off Northern homes, have felt the chill of disgust that crept through their souls. The inmost abhorrence of slavery that fills the heart of this people it is impossible for language to exaggerate. It is so strong, so wide-spread, so uncompromising, so fixed in its determination to destroy, root and branch, the accursed thing, that even the forces of evil and self-seeking, awed and overpowered, are swept into the line of its procession. Good men and bad men, lovers of country and lovers only of lucre, men who will fight to the death for a grand idea and men who fight only for some low ambition, worshippers of God and worshippers of Mammon, are alike putting their hands to the plough which is to overturn and overturn till the ancient evil is uprooted. The very father of lies is, perforce, become the servant of truth. That old enemy which is the Devil, the malignant messenger of all evil, finds himself,—somewhat amazed and enraged, we must believe, at his unexpected situation,—with all his executive ability undiminished, all his spiritual strength unimpaired, finds himself harnessed to the chariot of human freedom and human progress, and working in his own despite the beneficent will of God. So He maketh the wrath of men and devils to praise Him, and the remainder of wrath He will restrain.

And let all devoted hearts praise God for the hope we hold that He will quickly save this nation from its sins. Since the days of our ancestors, the land has been burdened with suffering and wrongdoing; yet no one knew where help would come from. Leaders and prophets rose in the North and South, warning of God’s anger against a nation that dared to uphold the great truth of human brotherhood in an unjust way, and that God’s favor rested only on those who act justly, love mercy, and walk humbly before Him; but they died in faith, never seeing the promises fulfilled. That faith in God, and thus in the eventual victory of righteousness over evil, never wavered; however, even the most optimistic souls had little faith that they would witness the salvation of the Lord. Righteous people spent their lives in unwavering and fierce protest, not really for any immediate outcome but because they simply could not do otherwise—because the constant violation of basic rights, the ongoing degradation of their country, tore at their hearts, leaving them unable to remain silent. Although they didn’t expect a sudden change, they believed in the strength of truth and knew their words would not return empty, but waited for some distant future when happier generations would come bearing their fruits. How does the promise appear now? A kind Providence has surpassed our slow hopes. The work we had hastily passed on to the wiser generations has rapidly approached completion within just a few intense years of our own. Slavery, once excused by the South and tolerated by the North—half acknowledged as an evil, half accepted as a compromise—is now finally revealed for what it really is, facing its just end. Public opinion, rapidly ignited amid this fierce war, is crystallizing everywhere. People are learning to clearly understand what they believe and, knowing, are bold enough to stand by it. There’s no more whispering or counseling patience and non-action. It’s no longer just a few brave individuals who openly denounce this great evil; the collective outrage of the people rises loudly and deeply—the collective hatred and horror of those who have witnessed the wicked deeds, who have felt their effects painfully in their own lives, and whose souls are poisoned by it. Hundreds of thousands of thoughtful individuals have entered this monstrous prison, have looked upon its vile features, have struggled against its slimy power; and countless others, watching from far-off Northern homes, have felt a deep chill of disgust creep through them. The deepest hatred of slavery within this nation is beyond exaggeration. It is so strong, so widespread, so unyielding, so committed to eradicating the cursed thing, that even the forces of evil and self-interest, awed and overpowered, are swept into its wake. Good people and bad people, lovers of their country and lovers of money, those willing to fight for a noble cause and those fighting for base ambition, worshippers of God and worshippers of wealth, are all joining in to uproot this ancient evil. The very father of lies has unintentionally become a servant of truth. That old enemy, the Devil, the malevolent messenger of all evil, finds himself—somewhat astonished and angry, we must believe, at his unforeseen situation—with all his resources intact, all his spiritual strength unbroken, now yoked to the chariot of human freedom and progress, working against his own will to fulfill God’s benevolent purpose. Thus, God uses the anger of men and demons to praise Him, and He will contain the remaining wrath.

Unspeakably cheering, both as a sign of the sincerity of our leaders in this great day and as a pledge of what the nation means to do when its hands are free, are the little Christian colonies planted in the rear of our victorious armies. In the heart of woods are often seen large tracts of open country gay with a brilliant purple bloom which the people call "fire-weed," because it springs up on spots that have been stripped by fire. So, where the old plantations of sloth and servitude have been consumed by the desolating flames of war, spring up the tender growths of Christian civilization. The filthy hovel is replaced by the decent cottage. The squalor of slavery is succeeded by the little adornments of ownership. The thrift of self-possession supplants the recklessness of irresponsibility. For the slave-pen we have the school-house. Where the lash labored to reduce men to the level of brutes, the Bible leads them up to the heights of angels. We are as yet but in the beginning, but we have begun right. With his staff the slave passes over the Jordan of his deliverance; but through the manly nurture and Christian training which we owe him, and which we shall pay, he shall become two bands. The people did not set themselves to combat prejudices with words alone, when the time was ripe for deeds; but while the Government was yet hesitating whether to put the musket into his hand for war, Christian men and women hastened to give him the primer for peace. Not waiting for legislative enactments, they took the freedman as he came all panting from the house of bondage; they ministered to his wants, strengthened his heart, and set him rejoicing on his way to manhood. The Proclamation of Emancipation may or may not be revoked; but whom knowledge has made a man, and discipline a soldier, no edict can make again a slave.

Incredibly uplifting, both as a sign of our leaders' sincerity on this significant day and as a promise of what the nation intends to do when it's free to act, are the small Christian communities established behind our victorious armies. In the heart of the woods, you can often see large stretches of open land filled with bright purple flowers that people call "fire-weed," because it grows in areas that have been cleared by fire. So, where the old plantations of laziness and servitude have been burned away by the destructive flames of war, the gentle growth of Christian civilization begins to flourish. The filthy shack is replaced by a respectable cottage. The misery of slavery is followed by the small comforts of ownership. The care that comes from self-reliance takes over the recklessness of being irresponsible. Instead of the slave pen, we now have the schoolhouse. Where the whip worked to reduce people to the level of animals, the Bible helps lift them to the heights of humanity. We are still only at the beginning, but we've started in the right direction. With his staff, the former slave crosses the Jordan into freedom; but through the strong guidance and Christian education we owe him, and which we will provide, he will become a powerful force. The people didn’t just try to fight prejudices with words when the time was right for action; while the Government hesitated about handing him a gun for war, Christian men and women quickly offered him the tools for peace. Not waiting for laws to be passed, they welcomed the freedman as he emerged, tired and breathless from bondage; they addressed his needs, strengthened his spirit, and helped him joyfully move toward adulthood. The Emancipation Proclamation may or may not be overturned; but those whom knowledge has transformed into men, and discipline has shaped into soldiers, no order can revert back into slaves.

While the people have been working in their individual capacity to right the wrongs of generations, our constituted authorities have been moving on steadfastly to the same end. Military necessity has emancipated thousands of slaves, and civil power has pressed ever nearer and nearer to the abolition of slavery. In all the confusion of war, the trumpet-tones of justice have rung through our national halls with no uncertain sound. With a pertinacity most exasperating to tyrants and infidels, but most welcome to the friends of human rights, Northern Senators and Representatives have presented the claims of the African race. With many a momentary[Pg 120] recession, the tide has swept irresistibly onward. Hopes have been baffled only to be strengthened. Measures have been defeated only to be renewed. Defeat has been accepted but as the stepping-stone to new endeavor. Cautiously, warily, Freedom has lain in wait to rescue her wronged children. Her watchful eyes have fastened upon every weakness in her foe: her ready hand has been upraised wherever there was a chance to strike. Quietly, almost unheard amid the loud-resounding clash of arms, her decrees have gone forth, instinct with the enfranchisement of a race. The war began with old customs and prejudices under full headway, but the new necessities soon met them with fierce collision. The first shock was felt when the escaping slaves of Rebel masters were pronounced free, and our soldiers were forbidden to return them. Then the blows came fast and furious, and the whole edifice, reared on that crumbling corner-stone of Slavery, reeled through all its heaven-defying heights. The gates of Liberty opened to the slave, on golden hinges turning. The voice of promise rang through Rebel encampments, and penetrated to the very fastnesses of Rebellion. The ranks of the army called the freedman to the rescue of his race. The courts of justice received him in witness of his manhood. Before every foreign court he was acknowledged as a citizen of his country, and as entitled to her protection. The capital of our nation was purged of the foul stain that dishonored her in the eyes of the nations, and that gave the lie direct to our most solemn Declaration. The fugitive-slave acts that disfigured our statute-book were blotted out, and fugitive-slave-stealer acts filled their vacant places. The seal of freedom, unconditional, perpetual, and immediate, was set upon the broad outlying lands of the republic, and from the present Congress we confidently await the crowning act which shall make slavery forever impossible, and liberty the one supreme, universal, unchangeable law in every part of our domains.

While people have been working individually to correct the injustices of past generations, our government officials have been steadily pursuing the same goal. The needs of the military have freed thousands of slaves, and civil authority has come increasingly closer to abolishing slavery. Amidst the chaos of war, the call for justice has echoed through our nation clearly. With a stubbornness that frustrates tyrants and skeptics but is a relief to advocates of human rights, Northern Senators and Representatives have pushed for the rights of the African race. Despite many setbacks, the momentum has surged forward. Disappointments have only made our resolve stronger. Defeats have been seen merely as steps toward new efforts. Cautiously, Freedom has waited to rescue her wronged children. She has been vigilant in spotting every weakness in her enemy: her hand has been ready to strike whenever there was an opportunity. Quietly, almost unnoticed amidst the sounds of battle, her decisions have been made, infused with the aim of freeing an entire race. The war started with old customs and prejudices in full force, but the new realities soon clashed with them dramatically. The first shock was felt when escaping slaves from Rebel masters were declared free, and our soldiers were instructed not to return them. Then the blows came rapidly and fiercely, and the whole structure built on the crumbling foundation of Slavery shook violently. The gates of Liberty swung open for the slaves, turning on golden hinges. The call for hope resonated through Rebel camps and reached deep into the heart of Rebellion. The army urged freedmen to join in the fight for their race. The courts welcomed them as proof of their humanity. In every foreign courtroom, they were recognized as citizens of their country, deserving its protection. The capital of our nation was cleansed of the ugly stain that shamed her before the world and contradicted our most important Declaration. The fugitive slave laws that marred our legal codes were eliminated, replaced by laws against stealing fugitives. The seal of freedom—unconditional, permanent, and immediate—was placed on the vast lands of the republic, and we confidently await the final action from the current Congress that will make slavery impossible forever and establish liberty as the one supreme, universal, and unchanging law across all our territories.

What we have done is an earnest of what we mean to do. After nearly four years of war, and war on such a scale as the world has never before seen, the people have once more, and in terms too emphatic to be misunderstood, proclaimed their undying purpose. With a unanimity rarely equalled, a people that had fought eight years against a tax of threepence on the pound, and that was rapidly advancing to the front rank of nations through the victories of peace,—a people jealous of its liberties and proud of its prosperity, has reëlected to the chief magistracy a man under whose administration burdensome taxes have been levied, immense armies marshalled, imperative drafts ordered, and fearful sufferings endured. They have done this because, in spite of possible mistakes and short-comings, they have seen his grasp ever tightening around the throat of Slavery, his weapons ever seeking the vital point of the Rebellion. They have beheld him standing always at his post, calm in the midst of peril, hopeful when all was dark, patient under every obloquy, courteous to his bitterest foes, conciliatory where conciliation was possible, inflexible where to yield was dishonor. Never have the passions of civil war betrayed him into cruelty or hurried him into revenge; nor has any hope of personal benefit or any fear of personal detriment stayed him when occasion beckoned. If he has erred, it has been on the side of leniency. If he has hesitated, it has been to assure himself of the right. Where there was censure, he claimed it for himself; where there was praise, he has lavished it on his subordinates. The strong he has braved, and the weak sheltered. He has rejected the counsels of his friends when they were inspired by partisanship, and adopted the suggestions of opponents when they were founded on wisdom. His ear has always been open to the people's voice, yet he has never suffered himself to be blindly driven by the storm of popular fury. He has consulted public opinion, as the public servant should; but he has not pandered to public prejudice, as only demagogues[Pg 121] do. Not weakly impatient to secure the approval of the country, he has not scorned to explain his measures to the understanding of the common people. Never bewildered by the solicitations of party, nor terrified by the menace of opposition, he has controlled with moderation, and yielded with dignity, as the exigencies of the time demanded. Entering upon office with his full share of the common incredulity, perceiving no more than his fellow-citizens the magnitude of the crisis, he has steadily risen to the height of the great argument. No suspicion of self-seeking stains his fair fame; but ever mindful of his solemn oath, he seeks with clean hands and a pure heart the welfare of the whole country. Future generations alone can do justice to his ability; his integrity is firmly established in the convictions of the present age. His reward is with him, though his work lies still before him.

What we've done is proof of what we intend to do. After almost four years of war, a conflict on a scale the world has never seen before, the people have once again, and in terms that can't be misunderstood, declared their unwavering commitment. With a unity that's rarely matched, a nation that had fought for eight years against a tax of threepence per pound, and that was quickly rising to the forefront of nations through peaceful victories— a nation proud of its freedoms and its prosperity— has re-elected to the highest office a man under whose leadership heavy taxes have been imposed, massive armies assembled, necessary drafts enacted, and significant suffering endured. They've done this because, despite any potential mistakes and shortcomings, they've seen his grip tightening around the neck of Slavery, his efforts always targeting the heart of the Rebellion. They've watched him consistently at his post, calm in danger, hopeful when everything seemed bleak, patient amidst criticism, respectful even to his harshest adversaries, conciliatory where reconciliation was possible, and unwavering where yielding would be disgraceful. The passions of civil war have never led him to cruelty or pushed him toward revenge; nor has any hope for personal gain or fear of personal loss stopped him when the moment called for action. If he's made errors, it's been from a place of mercy. If he's hesitated, it's been to ensure he acts rightly. He has taken on criticism personally and generously shared praise with his team. He has confronted the strong and protected the weak. He's dismissed the advice of friends when it stemmed from bias and embraced suggestions from opponents grounded in wisdom. His ear has always been open to the people's voices, but he's never allowed himself to be blindly directed by the tempest of public outrage. He has regarded public opinion as any public servant should; however, he has not catered to public opinion as only demagogues do. Not overly eager to win the nation's approval, he has not hesitated to explain his actions to the common people. Never confused by party pressure or intimidated by opposition threats, he has managed with restraint and yielded with grace as the circumstances required. Stepping into office with his share of common skepticism, understanding no more than his fellow citizens the gravity of the crisis, he has steadily risen to address the significant issues at hand. No hint of selfishness tarnishes his reputation; always mindful of his solemn oath, he pursues the country's well-being with clean hands and a pure heart. Only future generations can fully appreciate his capabilities; his integrity is firmly believed in by this current era. His reward is with him, even though his work is still unfinished.

Only less significant than the fact is the manner of his reflection. All sections of a continental country, with interests as diverse as latitude and longitude can make them, came up to secure, not any man's continuance in power, but the rule of law. The East called with her thousands, and the West answered with her tens of thousands. Baltimore that day washed out the blood-stains from her pavement, and free Maryland girded herself for a new career. Men who had voted for Washington came forward with the snows of a hundred winters on their brows, and amid the silence and tears of assembled throngs deposited their ballot for Abraham Lincoln. Daughters led their infirm fathers to the polls to be sure that no deception should mock their failing sight. Armless men dropped their votes from between their teeth. Sick men and wounded men, wounded on the battle-fields of their country, were borne on litters to give their dying testimony to the righteous cause. Dilettanteism, that would not soil its dainty hands with politics, dared no longer stand aloof, but gave its voice for national honor and national existence. Old party ties snapped asunder, and local prejudices shrivelled in the fire of newly kindled patriotism. Turbulence and violence, awed by the supreme majesty of a resolute nation, slunk away and hid their shame from the indignant day. Calmly, in the midst of raging war, in despite of threats and cajolery, with a lofty, unspoken contempt for those false men who would urge to anarchy and infamy, this great people went up to the ballot-box, and gave in its adhesion to human equality, civil liberty, and universal freedom. And as the good tidings of great joy flashed over the wires from every quarter, men recognized the finger of God, and, laying aside all lower exultation, gathered in the public places, and, standing reverently with uncovered heads, poured forth their rapturous thanksgiving in that sublime doxology which has voiced for centuries the adoration of the human soul:—

Only slightly less significant than the fact itself is how he reflected on it. People from all parts of the country, with interests as varied as their geography, came together not to support any individual's continued power, but to uphold the rule of law. The East called out with its thousands, and the West responded with its tens of thousands. That day, Baltimore cleaned the bloodstains from its streets, and free Maryland prepared for a new beginning. Men who had voted for Washington, now bearing the weight of a hundred winters, stepped forward amidst the silence and tears of the gathered crowds to cast their votes for Abraham Lincoln. Daughters helped their elderly fathers to the polls to ensure their frail sight wouldn’t be deceived. Men without arms cast their votes with their teeth. Sick and wounded soldiers, who had fought for their country, were carried on stretchers to give their final testimony to the righteous cause. Those who used to avoid politics were no longer able to stand aside; they raised their voices for national honor and existence. Old party loyalties were broken, and local biases melted away in the heat of a newly ignited patriotism. Turbulence and violence, intimidated by the overwhelming strength of a determined nation, slipped away to hide their shame from the daylight. Calmly, in the midst of a raging war, defying threats and flattery, with a quiet, unspoken disdain for those deceitful individuals promoting chaos and disgrace, this great people approached the ballot box and committed to human equality, civil liberty, and universal freedom. And as the good news of great joy spread across the wires from every direction, people recognized the hand of God and, putting aside all lesser celebrations, gathered in public spaces, standing reverently with uncovered heads, offering their heartfelt thanks in the profound doxology that has expressed the adoration of the human soul for centuries:—

"Thank God, from whom all blessings come!
Praise Him, all living beings here on Earth!
Praise Him above, you heavenly beings!
"Praise the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit!"

So America to the world gives greeting. So a free people meets and masters the obstacles that bar its progress. So this young republic speaks warning to the old despotisms, and hope to the struggling peoples. Thus with the sword she seeks peace under liberty. Striking off the shackles that fettered her own limbs, emerging from the thick of her deadly conflict, with many a dint on her armor, but with no shame on her brow, she starts on her victorious career, and bids the suffering nations take heart. With the old lie torn from her banner, the old life shall come back to her symbols. Her children shall no longer blush at the taunts of foreign tyrannies, but shall boldly proclaim her to be indeed the land of the free, as she has always been the home of the brave. Men's minds shall no longer be confused by distinctions between higher and lower law, to the infinite detriment of moral character, but all her laws shall be emanations from the infinite source of justice. Marshalling[Pg 122] thus all her forces on the Lord's side, she may inscribe, without mockery, on her silver and gold, "In God we trust." She may hope for purity in her homes, and honesty in her councils. She may front her growing grandeur without misgiving, knowing that it comes not by earthly might or power, but by the Spirit of the Lord of Hosts; and the only voice of her victory, the song of her thanksgiving, and her watchword to the nations shall be, "Glory to God in the highest; and on earth peace, good-will toward men."

So America greets the world. A free people confronts and overcomes the challenges that block its progress. This young republic warns the old dictatorships and offers hope to those who are struggling. With the sword, she seeks peace through liberty. She breaks the chains that held her back, emerging from the chaos of her fierce conflict, bearing many dents on her armor but no shame on her brow. She begins her victorious journey and encourages the suffering nations to have courage. With the old lie removed from her banner, the old life will return to her symbols. Her children will no longer be ashamed by the insults from foreign tyrants, but will proudly declare her to be truly the land of the free, just as she has always been the home of the brave. People's minds will no longer be clouded by the distinctions between higher and lower law, which harm moral character, but all her laws will derive from the infinite source of justice. By aligning all her forces on the Lord's side, she can genuinely inscribe on her silver and gold, "In God we trust." She can hope for purity in her homes and honesty in her governance. She can face her growing greatness without fear, knowing it comes not from earthly might or power, but from the Spirit of the Lord of Hosts; and the only voice of her victory, the song of her gratitude, and her rallying cry to the nations will be, "Glory to God in the highest; and on earth peace, good-will toward men."


REVIEWS AND LITERARY NOTICES.

America and her Commentators: With a Critical Sketch of Travel in the United States. By Henry T. Tuckerman. New York: Charles Scribner. 8vo. pp. 460.

America and her Commentators: With a Critical Sketch of Travel in the United States. By Henry T. Tuckerman. New York: Charles Scribner. 8vo. pp. 460.

If a little late, we are none the less sincere in extending to this timely and excellent work a hearty welcome. It is full of varied interest and valuable instruction. It is equally adapted to attract and edify our own citizens, and to guide and inform those foreigners who wish to know the history and facts of American society. The object of the work is to present a general view of the traits and transitions of our country, as they are reflected in the records made at different periods by writers of various nationalities, and to discuss, in connection with this exhibition, the temper and value of the principal critics of our civilization, emphasizing and indorsing their correct observations, pointing out and rectifying their erroneous ones. There are obviously many great advantages in thus reverting to the past and examining the present of American institutions and life by the help of the literature of travel in America,—a literature so richly suggestive, because so constantly modified by the national peculiarities and personal points of view of the writers. Mr. Tuckerman has improved these advantages with care and tact. In the preface and introduction, characterized by an ample command of the resources of the subject, easy discursiveness and lively criticism, he puts the reader in possession of such preliminary information as he will like or need to have. The body of the work begins with a portrayal of America as it appeared to its earliest discoverers and explorers. The second chapter is devoted to the Jesuit missionaries, who, reviving the spirit of the Crusades, plunged into the wilderness to convert the aborigines to Christianity, and, inspired by the wonders of the virgin solitude, became the pioneer writers of American travels. Chapters third and fourth deal with the French travellers who have visited and written on our country, from Chastellux to Laboulaye. The similar list of British travellers and writers is presented and discussed in the fifth and sixth chapters. Chapter seventh is taken up with "English Abuse of America"; and the subject has rarely been treated so fitly and firmly, with such a blending of just severity and moderation. "Cockneyism," Mr. Tuckerman says, "may seem not worthy of analysis, far less of refutation; but, as Sydney Smith remarked, 'In a country surrounded by dikes, a rat may inundate a province'; and it is the long-continued gnawing of the tooth of detraction, that, at a momentous crisis, let in the cold flood at last upon the nation's heart, and quenched its traditional love." The eighth chapter depicts the views and characterizes the qualities of the Northern European authors who have travelled in America and written concerning us. In the ninth chapter our Italian visitors and critics are treated in like manner. And in the tenth chapter the same task is performed for the Americans themselves who have journeyed through and written on their own country. Then follows the conclusion, recapitulating and applying the results of the whole survey. And the work properly closes with an index, furnishing the reader facilities for immediate reference to any passage, topic, or name he wishes to find.[Pg 123]

If it's a little late, we still sincerely welcome this timely and excellent work. It's full of diverse interest and valuable insights. It's designed to attract and educate our own citizens, as well as guide and inform foreigners who want to learn about the history and facts of American society. The goal of this work is to provide a general overview of the traits and changes in our country, as reflected in the accounts created at different times by writers from various backgrounds, and to discuss, in connection with this presentation, the attitudes and value of the main critics of our civilization, highlighting and endorsing their accurate observations while pointing out and correcting their inaccuracies. There are clearly many significant benefits to looking back at the past and examining the present of American institutions and life through the lens of travel literature in America—a literature that is richly thought-provoking, constantly shaped by the unique characteristics and perspectives of the writers. Mr. Tuckerman has skillfully utilized these advantages. In the preface and introduction, marked by a strong grasp of the subject, smooth narration, and lively critique, he provides the reader with essential background information that will be interesting or necessary to know. The main body of the work begins with a depiction of America as it was seen by its earliest discoverers and explorers. The second chapter focuses on the Jesuit missionaries, who, rekindling the spirit of the Crusades, ventured into the wilderness to convert the indigenous people to Christianity and, inspired by the wonders of the untouched wilderness, became the first writers of American travel. The third and fourth chapters cover the French travelers who have visited and written about our country, from Chastellux to Laboulaye. A comparable list of British travelers and writers is presented and discussed in the fifth and sixth chapters. The seventh chapter addresses "English Abuse of America," and the topic has rarely been handled so appropriately and strongly, with a blend of fair critique and moderation. "Cockneyism," Mr. Tuckerman notes, "may seem unworthy of analysis, much less of rebuttal; but, as Sydney Smith remarked, 'In a country surrounded by dikes, a rat may inundate a province'; and it is the persistent nibbling of the pest of disparagement that, at a critical moment, finally allowed the cold flood to seep into the nation's heart and extinguished its longstanding affection." The eighth chapter describes the perspectives and characterizes the qualities of Northern European authors who have traveled in America and written about us. In the ninth chapter, our Italian visitors and critics are addressed similarly. In the tenth chapter, the same analysis is done for Americans themselves who have traveled through and written about their own country. Following is the conclusion, summarizing and applying the results of the entire survey. The work properly concludes with an index, providing the reader with easy access to any passage, topic, or name they wish to find.[Pg 123]

For the task he has here undertaken Mr. Tuckerman is well qualified by the varied and comprehensive range of his knowledge and culture, the devotion of his life to travel, art, and study. His pages not only illustrate, they also vindicate, the character and claims of American nationality. He shows that "there never was a populous land about which the truth has been more generalized and less discriminated." His descriptions of local scenery and historic incidents recognize all that is lovely and sublime in our national landscapes, all that is romantic or distinctive in our national life. His humane and ethical sympathies are ready, discriminating, and generous; his approbations and rebukes, vivid and generally rightly applied. These and other associated qualities lend interest and value to the biographic sketches he presents of the numerous travellers and authors whose works pass in review. The pictures of many of these persons—such as Marquette, Volney, D'Allessandro, Bartram—are psychological studies of much freshness and force.

For the task he has taken on, Mr. Tuckerman is well-suited due to his broad and deep knowledge and culture, along with his lifelong dedication to travel, art, and study. His writing not only illustrates but also defends the character and claims of American identity. He points out that "there never was a populous land about which the truth has been more generalized and less discriminated." His descriptions of local scenery and historical events highlight everything that is beautiful and inspiring in our national landscapes, as well as everything that is unique or romantic in our national life. His compassion and ethical viewpoints are thoughtful, discerning, and generous; his praises and criticisms are vivid and usually spot-on. These and other related qualities add interest and value to the biographical profiles he shares of the many travelers and authors whose works he reviews. The portrayals of several of these figures—like Marquette, Volney, D'Allessandro, and Bartram—are psychological studies that are both fresh and impactful.

Biographical Sketches of Loyalists of the American Revolution: With an Historical Essay. By Lorenzo Sabine. Two Volumes. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co. 8vo. pp. 608, 600.

Biographical Sketches of Loyalists of the American Revolution: With an Historical Essay. By Lorenzo Sabine. Two Volumes. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co. 8vo. pp. 608, 600.

Mr. Sabine has attempted in these volumes to present in a judicial spirit a chapter of our Revolutionary history which usually bears the most of passion in its recital,—believing, as he does, that impartiality is identical with charity, in dealing with his theme. The first edition of his work, in a single volume, has been before the public seventeen years. The zeal and fidelity of his labor have been well appreciated. So far as his purpose has involved a plea or an apology for the Loyalists of the American Revolution, his critics who have at all abated their commendation of him have challenged him on the side where he might most willingly have been supposed to err, that of an excess of leniency. As to the class of men with whom he deals generally in his introductory essay, and individually in the elaborate biographical sketches which follow, the same difficulty presents itself which is encountered in all attempts to canvass the faults or the characteristics of any body of men who bear a common party-name or share a common opinion, while in the staple of real virtue or vice, of honor or baseness, of sincerity or hypocrisy, they may represent the poles of difference. The contemporary estimate of the Tories, and in large part the treatment of them which was thought to be just, were, in the main, adjusted with reference to the meanest and most malignant portion. Mr. Sabine, while by no means espousing the championship even of the best of them, would have the whole body judged with the candor which comes of looking at their general fellowship in the light of its natural prejudices, prepossessions, and embarrassments. It is to be considered also that the best of the class were a sort of warrant for the worst.

Mr. Sabine has tried in these volumes to present a chapter of our Revolutionary history that usually evokes strong emotions, believing that being impartial is the same as being charitable when addressing his topic. The first edition of his work, published as a single volume, has been available to the public for seventeen years. The dedication and accuracy of his work have been well recognized. Insofar as his aim has included a defense or justification for the Loyalists of the American Revolution, those critics who have tempered their praise for him have questioned him on the point where he might be perceived to overindulge, that of being overly lenient. As for the group of people he discusses broadly in his introductory essay and individually in the detailed biographical sketches that follow, the same challenge arises that occurs in all efforts to evaluate the flaws or traits of any group sharing a common political label or viewpoint, while in reality, they may greatly differ in virtue or vice, honor or dishonor, sincerity or hypocrisy. The prevailing view of the Tories and much of the treatment they received, which was considered fair, were mainly shaped by the least reputable and most spiteful members. Mr. Sabine, while not advocating for even the best among them, would like the entire group to be judged with the fairness that comes from understanding their collective experiences in light of their inherent biases, preconceptions, and challenges. It's also worth noting that the best of this group were somewhat responsible for the worst.

Those who are tolerably well read in the biographies and histories of our Revolutionary period are aware that Dr. Franklin, who, about most exciting and passion-stirring subjects, was a man of remarkably moderate and tolerant spirit, was eminently a hater of the Tories, unrelenting in his animosity towards them, and sternly set against all the measures proposed at the Peace for their relief, either by the British Government to enforce our remuneration of their losses, or by our own General or State Governments to soften the penalties visited upon them. The origin and the explanation of this intense feeling of animosity toward the Loyalists in the breast of that philosopher of moderation are easily traced to one of the most interesting incidents in his residence near the British Court as agent for Pennsylvania and Massachusetts. The incident is connected with the still unexplained mystery of his getting possession of the famous letters of Hutchinson, Oliver, etc. Franklin was living and directing all his practical efforts for enlightening and influencing those whom he supposed to be simply the ignorant plotters of mischief against the Colonists, under the full and most confident belief that those plotters were merely the stupid and conceited members of the British Cabinet. He never had dreamed that he was to look either above them to the King, or behind them to any unknown instigators of their mischief. With perfect good faith on his own part, he gave them the benefit of their own supposed ignorance, wrong-headedness, wilfulness, and ingenuity, such as it was, in inventing irritating and oppressive measures which, he warned them, would inevitably alienate the hearts and the allegiance of the Colonists. He records, that, while he had never had a thought but such as this imagined state of the facts had favored, a Liberal member of[Pg 124] Parliament, an intimate friend of his, coming to him for a private interview, had told him that the Ministry were not the prime movers in this mischief, but were instigated to it by parties whom Franklin little suspected of such an agency. When the Doctor expressed his incredulity, the friend promised to give him decisive evidence of the full truth of his assertion. It came to Franklin in a form which astounded him, while it opened his eyes and fixed his indignation upon a class of men who from that moment onward were to him the exponents of all malignity and baseness. The evidence came in the shape of the originals, the autographs, of the above-named letters, written by natives of the American soil, office-holders under the Crown, who, while pampered and trusted by their constituents on this side of the water, were actually dictating, advising, and inspiriting the measures of the British Ministry most hateful to the Colonists. Franklin never overcame the impression from that shock. When he was negotiating the treaty of peace, he set his face and heart most resolutely against all the efforts and propositions made by the representatives of the Crown to secure to the Tories redress or compensation. He insisted that Britain, in espousing their alleged wrongs, indicated that she herself ought to remunerate their losses; that they, in fact, had been her agents and instruments, as truly as were her Crown officials and troops. Their malignant hostility toward their fellow-Colonists, and the sufferings and losses entailed on America by their open assertion of the rights of the Crown, and by the direct or indirect help which oppressive measures had received from them, had deprived them of all claim even on the pity of those who had triumphed in spite of them. At any rate, Franklin insisted, and it was the utmost to which he would assent,—his irony and sarcasm in making the offer showing the depth of his bitterness on the subject,—that a balance should be struck between the losses of the Loyalists and those of the Colonists in the conflagration of their sea-ports and the outrages on the property of individual patriots.

Those who are somewhat familiar with the biographies and histories of our Revolutionary period know that Dr. Franklin, who was usually a man of moderate and tolerant spirit on most exciting and passionate topics, had a strong dislike for the Tories. He was relentless in his anger towards them and firmly opposed all measures suggested at the Peace that aimed to assist them, whether from the British Government seeking compensation for their losses or from our own General or State Governments looking to lessen the penalties imposed on them. The root and reasoning behind his intense animosity toward the Loyalists can be traced back to one of the most fascinating incidents during his time living near the British Court as an agent for Pennsylvania and Massachusetts. This incident relates to the still mysterious way he came to possess the famous letters from Hutchinson, Oliver, and others. Franklin believed he was dealing with what he thought were simply uninformed troublemakers against the Colonists, thinking of these troublemakers as nothing more than ignorant and arrogant members of the British Cabinet. He never imagined he should look above them to the King or behind them to any unknown instigators of their wrongdoings. With complete good faith, he assumed they were acting out of their supposed ignorance and misguided intentions, warning them that the irritating and oppressive measures they were proposing would surely alienate the Colonists’ hearts and loyalty. He noted that even though he never entertained any thoughts beyond what he believed the situation to be, a Liberal member of [Pg 124] Parliament, a close friend of his, came to him for a private chat and told him that the Ministry weren’t the primary instigators of this trouble, but were being influenced by parties Franklin hardly suspected were involved. When Dr. Franklin expressed disbelief, the friend promised to provide clear proof of his claim. The evidence eventually came in a form that shocked him and opened his eyes, fixing his anger on a group of men who became, from that moment forward, symbols of all that was malicious and vile. The proof arrived as original letters, handwritten by men born in America, office-holders under the Crown, who, while receiving the trust and support of their constituents back home, were actually dictating, advising, and encouraging the hateful policies of the British Ministry against the Colonists. Franklin never fully recovered from that revelation. When he was negotiating the peace treaty, he strongly opposed all attempts and proposals made by Crown representatives to secure compensation or redress for the Tories. He argued that by supporting their supposed wrongs, Britain implied that she should compensate for their losses, asserting that they had acted as her agents just as much as her Crown officials and troops had. Their hostile actions towards fellow Colonists and the suffering and losses America endured due to their advocacy of Crown rights, along with the direct or indirect support they provided for oppressive measures, had stripped them of any claim to even the sympathy of those who had triumphed despite them. Regardless, Franklin insisted—and this was as far as he would go, his irony and sarcasm in making the offer highlighting the depth of his bitterness—that a balance should be established between the losses of the Loyalists and those of the Colonists resulting from the burning of their sea ports and the damage to individual patriots' properties.

The views and feelings of Franklin have been essentially those which have since prevailed popularly among us regarding the old Tories. Of course, when hard-pressed, he was willing to recognize a difference in the motives which prompted individuals and in the degrees of their turpitude. Mr. Sabine gives us in his introductory essay a most admirable analysis of the whole subject-matter, with an accurate and instructive array of all the facts bearing upon it. No man has given more thorough or patient inquiry to it, or has had better opportunities for gathering materials of prime authority and perfect authenticity for the treatment of it. In the biographical sketches which crowd his volumes will be found matter of varied and profound interest, alternately engaging the tender sympathy and firing the indignation of the reader. One can hardly fail of bethinking himself that the moral and judicial reflections which come from perusing this work will by and by, under some slight modifications, attach to the review of the characters and course of some men who are in antagonism to their country's cause in these days.

The views and feelings of Franklin have basically been the same as those that are now common among us regarding the old Tories. Of course, when under pressure, he was willing to acknowledge that there were differences in the motivations behind individual actions and in the levels of their wrongdoing. Mr. Sabine provides us in his introductory essay an excellent analysis of the entire topic, along with a precise and informative collection of all the relevant facts. No one has done a more thorough or patient investigation into it, or has had better chances to gather credible and authentic materials for addressing it. In the biographical sketches that fill his volumes, there is a wealth of varied and deep interest, which alternates between evoking sympathy and igniting the reader's anger. One cannot help but consider that the moral and judicial reflections arising from reading this work will eventually, with some minor adjustments, apply to reviewing the characters and actions of some people who are opposed to their country's cause today.

Broken Lights: An Inquiry into the Present Condition and Future Prospects of Religious Faith. By Frances Power Cobbe. Boston: J. E. Tilton & Co.

Broken Lights: An Inquiry into the Present Condition and Future Prospects of Religious Faith. By Frances Power Cobbe. Boston: J. E. Tilton & Co.

Among the countless errors of faith which have misled mankind, there is none more dangerous, or more common, than that of confounding the forms of religion with religion itself. Too often, alike to believer and unbeliever, this has proved the one fatal mistake. Many an honest and earnest soul, feeling the deep needs of a spiritual life, but unable to separate those things which the heart would accept from those against which the reason revolts, has rejected all together, and turned away sorrowful, if not scoffing. On the other hand, the state of that man, who, because his mind has settled down upon certain externals of religion, deems that he has secured its essentials also, is worse than that of the skeptic. The freezing traveller, who is driven by the rocks (of hard doctrine) and the thorns (of doubt) to keep his limbs in motion, stands a far better chance of finding his way out of the wilderness than he who lies down on the softest bed of snow, flatters himself that all is well, and dreams of home, whilst the deadly torpor creeps over him.

Among the countless mistakes in faith that have misled humanity, none is more dangerous or more common than confusing the forms of religion with religion itself. Too often, this becomes the one fatal error for both believers and nonbelievers. Many honest and sincere individuals, feeling the deep need for a spiritual life but unable to distinguish between what the heart embraces and what the mind resists, have completely rejected religion and walked away, sad or even mocking. On the flip side, the situation of someone who has settled on certain outward practices of religion and believes they have grasped its core is worse than that of a skeptic. The cold traveler who is pushed by the rocks (of rigid beliefs) and the thorns (of doubt) to keep moving has a much better chance of finding a way out of the wilderness than the one who lies down on the softest bed of snow, convincing himself that everything is fine, and dreams of home while a deadly numbness takes over.

If help and guidance and good cheer for all such be not found in this little volume, it is certainly no fault of the writer's intention. She brings to her task the power of profound conviction, inspiring a devout wish to lead others into the way of truth. Beneath the multiform systems of theology[Pg 125] she finds generally the same firm foundations of faith,—"faith in the existence of a righteous God, faith in the eternal Law of Morality, faith in an Immortal Life." None enjoys a monopoly of truth, although all are based upon it. Each is a lighthouse, more or less lofty, and more or less illumined by the glory that burns within; yet their purest rays are only "broken lights." The glory itself is infinite: it is only through human narrowness and imperfection that it appears narrow and imperfect. The lighthouse is good in its place: it beckons home, with its "wheeling arms of dark and bright," many a benighted voyager; but we must remember that it is a structure made with hands, and not confound the stone and iron of human contrivance with the great Source and Fountain of Light.

If you can’t find help, guidance, and happiness in this little book, it’s definitely not due to the writer's intentions. She approaches her work with strong conviction, driven by a sincere desire to lead others toward the truth. Beneath the various theological systems[Pg 125], she generally finds the same solid foundations of faith—“faith in the existence of a righteous God, faith in the eternal Law of Morality, faith in an Immortal Life.” No one has a monopoly on truth, even though everyone is built on it. Each one is like a lighthouse, varying in height and brightness from the glory that shines within; yet their brightest rays are merely "broken lights." The glory itself is infinite: it is only through human limitations and flaws that it seems narrow and imperfect. The lighthouse serves its purpose well: it guides many lost travelers home with its "wheeling arms of dark and bright"; but we must remember that it is a man-made structure, and we shouldn’t confuse the stone and iron of human creation with the great Source and Fountain of Light.

The writer does not grope with uncertain purpose among these imperfect rays, and she is never confused by them. To each she freely gives credit for what it is or has been; but all fade at last before the unspeakable brightness of the rising sun. She discerns the dawn of that day when all our little candles may be safely extinguished: for it is not in any church, nor in any creed, nor yet in any book, that all of God's law is contained; but the light of His countenance shines primarily on the souls of men, out of which all religions have proceeded, and into which we must look for the ever new and ever vital faith, which is to the unclouded conscience what the sunshine is to sight.

The writer doesn't wander aimlessly among these imperfect rays and is never confused by them. She acknowledges each one for what it is or has been; but they all eventually fade before the indescribable brightness of the rising sun. She recognizes the dawn of that day when all our little candles can be safely snuffed out: for it isn't found in any church, creed, or book that all of God's law is contained; rather, the light of His presence shines primarily on the souls of people, from which all religions have emerged, and into which we must look for the constantly renewing and essential faith, which is to a clear conscience what sunshine is to vision.

Such is the conclusion the author arrives at through an array of arguments of which we shall not attempt a summary. It is not necessary to admit what these are designed to prove, in order to derive refreshment and benefit from the pure tone of morality, the fervent piety, and the noble views of practical religion which animate her pages. It is not a book to be afraid of. No violent hand is here laid upon the temple; but only the scaffoldings, which, as she perceives, obscure the beauty of the temple, are taken away. Not only those who have rejected religion because they could not receive its dogmas, but all who have struggled with their doubts and mastered them, or thought they mastered them, nay, any sincere seeker for the truth, will find Miss Cobbe's unpretending treatise exceedingly valuable and suggestive; while to any one interested in modern theological discussions we would recommend it as containing the latest, and perhaps the clearest and most condensed, statement of the questions at issue which these discussions have called out.

Such is the conclusion the author reaches through a variety of arguments, which we won’t summarize. It's not necessary to agree with what these arguments are trying to prove in order to find enjoyment and benefit from the clear moral tone, passionate spirituality, and noble perspectives on practical religion that fill her pages. This isn't a book to fear. There’s no harsh criticism of the faith; instead, she's just removing the scaffolding that, as she sees it, hides the beauty of the faith. Not only those who have turned away from religion because they couldn’t accept its doctrines, but also anyone who has wrestled with their doubts and overcome them, or thought they had, and indeed, any genuine truth seeker, will find Miss Cobbe's straightforward essay incredibly valuable and thought-provoking. For those interested in modern theological debates, we recommend it as it contains the latest, and perhaps the clearest and most concise, overview of the relevant issues that these discussions have raised.

The spirit of the book is admirable. Both the skeptic who sneers and the bigot who denounces might learn a beautiful lesson from its calm, yet earnest pages. It is free from the brilliant shallowness of Renan, and the bitterness which sometimes marred the teachings of Parker. It is a generous, tender, noble book,—enjoying, indeed, over most works of its class a peculiar advantage; for, while its logic has everywhere a masculine strength and clearness, there glows through all an element too long wanting to our hard systems of theology,—an element which only woman's heart can supply.

The spirit of the book is commendable. Both the skeptic who scoffs and the bigot who condemns could learn a valuable lesson from its calm yet sincere pages. It is free from the flashy superficiality of Renan and the bitterness that sometimes tainted Parker's teachings. It is a generous, compassionate, noble book—enjoying, in fact, a unique advantage over most works of its kind; for while its logic has a masculine strength and clarity throughout, there shines an element too long missing from our rigid systems of theology—an element that only a woman's heart can provide.

Yet, notwithstanding the lofty reason, the fine intuition, the philanthropy and hope, which inspire its pages, we close the book with a sense of something wanting. The author points out the danger there always is of a faith which is intellectually demonstrable becoming, with many, a faith of the intellect merely,—and frankly avows that "there is a cause why Theism, even in warmer and better natures, too often fails to draw out that fervent piety" which is characteristic of narrower and intenser beliefs. This cause she traces to the neglect of prayer, and the consequent removal afar off, to vague confines of consciousness, of the Personality and Fatherhood of God. Her observations on this important subject are worthy of serious consideration, from those rationalists especially whose cold theories do not admit anything so "unphilosophical" as prayer. Yet we find in the book itself a want. The author—like nearly all writers from her point of view—ignores the power of miracle. Because physical impossibilities, or what seem such, have been so readily accepted as facts owing their origin to divine interposition, they fall to the opposite extreme of denying the occurrence of any events out of the common course of Nature's operations. Of the positive and powerful ministration of angels in human affairs they make no account whatever, or accept it as a pleasing dream; and they forget that what we call a miracle may be as truly an offspring of immutable law as the dew and the sunshine,—failing to learn of the loadstone, which attracts to itself splinters of steel contrary to all the commonly observed laws of gravitation, the simple truth that man also may become a magnet, and, by the power of the divine[Pg 126] currents passing through him, do many things astonishing to every-day experience. The feats of a vulgar thaumaturgy, designed to make the ignorant stare, may well be dispensed with. But the fact that "spiritualism," with all its crudities of doctrine and errors of practice, has spread over Christendom with a rapidity to which the history of religious beliefs affords no parallel, shows that the realization of supernatural influences is an absolute need of the human heart. The soul of the earlier forms of worship dies out of them, as this faith dies out, or becomes merely traditional; and no new system can look to fill their places without it.

Yet, despite the high ideals, the keen insights, the kindness, and the hope that inspire its pages, we finish the book feeling that something is missing. The author highlights the risk that a faith which can be intellectually proven might, for many, turn into just an intellectual exercise. She openly admits that "there's a reason why Theism, even in warmer and more compassionate people, often fails to evoke that passionate devotion" that is typical of more rigid and intense beliefs. She attributes this to the neglect of prayer and the resulting distance, pushed into the vague corners of our awareness, from the Personality and Fatherhood of God. Her thoughts on this significant issue are deserving of serious reflection, especially from those rationalists whose cold theories reject anything so "unphilosophical" as prayer. Still, we sense a lack in the book itself. The author—like almost all writers from her perspective—overlooks the power of miracles. Because physical impossibilities, or what seem to be such, have been so readily accepted as facts arising from divine intervention, they swing to the opposite extreme of denying any events outside the normal course of Nature’s operations. They completely disregard the positive and impactful role of angels in human affairs or dismiss it as a comforting fantasy; and they fail to remember that what we consider a miracle can be just as much a product of unchanging law as the dew and sunshine—failing to learn from the magnet, which draws bits of steel to itself against all commonly observed laws of gravitation, the simple truth that humans can also become magnets and, through divine currents flowing through them, perform things that astonish everyday experiences. The tricks of a common magician, meant to wow the uninformed, can be set aside. But the reality that "spiritualism," with all its doctrinal flaws and practical mistakes, has rapidly spread across Christendom in a way that the history of religious beliefs has never seen before shows that the awareness of supernatural influences is a fundamental need of the human heart. The essence of the earlier forms of worship fades away as this faith wanes or becomes merely traditional; and no new system can expect to take their place without it.

Letters of Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy from 1833 to 1847. Two Volumes. Philadelphia: F. Leypoldt.

Letters of Felix Mendelssohn from 1833 to 1847. Two Volumes. Philadelphia: F. Leypoldt.

There are many people who make very little discrimination between one musician and another,—who discern no great gulf between Mendelssohn and Meyerbeer, between Rossini and Romberg, between Spohr and Spontini: not in respect of music, but of character; of character in itself, and not as it may develop itself in chaste or florid, sentimental, gay, devotional or dramatic musical forms. And as yet we have very little help in our efforts to gain insight into the inner nature of our great musical artists. Of Meyerbeer the world knows that he was vain, proud, and fond of money,—but whether he had soul or not we do not know; the profound religiousness of Handel, who spent his best years on second-rate operas, and devoted his declining energies to oratorio, we have to guess at rather than reach by direct disclosure; and till Mr. Thayer shall take away the mantle which yet covers his Beethoven, we shall know but little of the interior nature of that wonderful man. But Mendelssohn now stands before us, disclosed by the most searching of all processes, his own letters to his own friends. And how graceful, how winning, how true, tender, noble is the man! We have not dared to write a notice of these two volumes while we were fresh from their perusal, lest the fascination of that genial, Christian presence should lead us into the same frame which prompted not only the rhapsodies of "Charles Auchester," but the same passionate admiration which all England felt, while Mendelssohn lived, and which Elizabeth Sheppard shared, not led. We lay down these volumes after the third perusal, blessing God for the rich gift of such a life,—a life, sweet, gentle, calm, nowise intense nor passionate, yet swift, stirring, and laborious even to the point of morbidness. A Christian without cant; a friend, not clinging to a few and rejecting the many, nor diffusing his love over the many with no dominating affection for a few near ones, but loving his own with a tenacity almost unparalleled, yet reaching out a free, generous sympathy and kindly devotion even to the hundreds who could give him nothing but their love. It is thought that his grief over his sister Fanny was the occasion of the rupture of a blood-vessel in his head, and that it was the proximate cause of his own death; and yet he who loved with this idolatrous affection gave his hand to many whose names he hardly knew. The reader will not overlook, in the second series of letters, the plea in behalf of an old Swiss guide for remembrance in "Murray," nor that long letter to Mr. Simrock, the music-publisher, enjoining the utmost secrecy, and then urging the claims of a man whom he was most desirous to help.

There are many people who make very little distinction between one musician and another—who see no significant difference between Mendelssohn and Meyerbeer, between Rossini and Romberg, between Spohr and Spontini: not in terms of music, but character; character itself, and not how it may manifest in pure or elaborate, sentimental, cheerful, spiritual, or dramatic musical forms. And so far, we have very little help in our efforts to understand the true nature of our great musical artists. About Meyerbeer, the world knows he was vain, proud, and money-loving—but whether he had a soul or not remains unclear; the deep religiousness of Handel, who spent his prime on mediocre operas and focused his later years on oratorio, we can only guess rather than know for sure; and until Mr. Thayer reveals more about Beethoven, we’ll know little of the inner life of that remarkable man. However, Mendelssohn now stands before us, revealed through the most honest process of all: his own letters to his friends. How graceful, how charming, how genuine, tender, and noble is this man! We hesitated to write about these two volumes right after reading them, afraid that the charm of his warm, Christian spirit would lead us to the same enthusiasm that sparked not only the praises of "Charles Auchester," but also the passionate admiration felt by all of England while Mendelssohn was alive, which Elizabeth Sheppard shared, unprompted. After reading these volumes for the third time, we put them down, thanking God for the rich gift of such a life—a life that was sweet, gentle, calm, not overly intense or passionate, yet swift, engaging, and industrious to the point of being almost morbid. A Christian without pretension; a friend who didn't just cling to a select few while rejecting the rest, nor spread his love too thinly over the many without a profound affection for a few close ones, but loved his own with a remarkable tenacity while also extending a free, generous sympathy and warm devotion to the hundreds who could give him nothing but their love. It’s believed that his grief over his sister Fanny led to the rupture of a blood vessel in his head and was a significant factor in his own death; yet, the one who loved with such devoted affection also reached out to many whose names he scarcely knew. The reader will not miss, in the second series of letters, the request for remembrance of an old Swiss guide in "Murray," nor that lengthy letter to Mr. Simrock, the music publisher, stressing the importance of utmost secrecy while also advocating for a man he was eager to help.

The letters from Italy and Switzerland were written during the two years with which he prefaced his quarter-century of labor as composer, director, and virtuoso. They relate much to Italian painting, the music of Passion Week, Swiss scenery, his stay with Goethe, and his brilliant reception in England on his return. They disclose a youth of glorious promise.

The letters from Italy and Switzerland were written during the two years that he used to kick off his twenty-five years of work as a composer, director, and performer. They cover a lot about Italian art, the music of Passion Week, the scenery of Switzerland, his time with Goethe, and his amazing welcome in England upon his return. They reveal a young man with a bright future ahead.

The second series does not disappoint that promise. The man is the youth a little less exuberant, a little more mature, but no less buoyant, tender, and loving. The letters are as varied as the claims of one's family differ from those of the outside world, but are always Mendelssohnian,—free, pure, unworldly, yet deep and wise. They continue down to the very close of his life. They are edited by his brother Paul, and another near relative. Yet unauthorized publications of other letters will follow, for Mendelssohn was a prolific letter-writer; and Lampadius, a warm admirer of the composer, has recently announced such a volume. The public may rejoice in this; for Mendelssohn was not only purity, but good sense itself; he needs no critical editing; and if we may yet have more strictly musical letters from his pen, the influence of the two volumes now under notice will be largely increased.

The second series definitely lives up to that promise. The man is a bit less lively, a bit more mature, but still just as cheerful, caring, and loving. The letters are as diverse as the differences between one's family and the outside world, but they always reflect Mendelssohn's style—free, pure, unpretentious, yet profound and wise. They continue until the very end of his life. His brother Paul and another close relative edited them. However, unauthorized publications of other letters will come out, since Mendelssohn was a prolific correspondent; and Lampadius, a devoted admirer of the composer, has recently announced such a volume. The public can celebrate this, because Mendelssohn embodied not just purity, but also practical wisdom; he doesn’t need any critical edits; and if we get more strictly musical letters from him, the impact of the two volumes currently in focus will be greatly enhanced.

It is not enough to say of these volumes that they are bright, piquant, genial, affectionate;[Pg 127] nor is it enough to speak of their artistic worth, the subtile appreciation of painting in the first series, and of music in the second; it is not enough to refer to the glimpses which they give of eminent artists,—Chopin, Rossini, Donizetti, Hiller, and Moscheles,—nor the side-glances at Thorwaldsen, Bunsen, the late scholarly and art-loving King of Prussia, Schadow, Overbeck, Cornelius, and the Düsseldorf painters; nor is it enough to dwell upon that delightful homage to father and mother, that confiding trust in brother and sisters, that loyalty to friends. The salient feature of these charming books is the unswerving devotion to a great purpose; the careless disregard, nay, the abrupt refusal, of fame, unless it came in an honest channel; the naïve modesty that made him wonder, even in the very last years of his life, that he could be the man whose entrance into the crowded halls of London and Birmingham should be the signal of ten minutes' protracted cheering; the refusal to set art over against money; the unwillingness to undertake the mandates of a king, unless with the cordial acquiescence of his artistic conscience; and the immaculate purity, not alone of his life, but of his thought. How he castigates Donizetti's love of money and his sloth! how his whip scourges the immorality of the French opera, and his whole soul abhors the sensuality of that stage! how steadfastly he refuses to undertake the composition of an opera till the faultless libretto for which he patiently waited year after year could be prepared! We wish our religious societies would call out a few of the letters of this man and scatter them broadcast over the land: they would indeed be "leaves for the healing of the nations."

It’s not enough to say that these volumes are bright, lively, warm, and affectionate;[Pg 127] nor is it enough to talk about their artistic value, the subtle appreciation of painting in the first series, and of music in the second; it’s not enough to mention the insights they provide into notable artists—Chopin, Rossini, Donizetti, Hiller, and Moscheles—nor the references to Thorwaldsen, Bunsen, the late scholarly and art-loving King of Prussia, Schadow, Overbeck, Cornelius, and the Düsseldorf painters; nor is it enough to focus on that lovely tribute to parents, that trusting bond with siblings, that loyalty to friends. The standout quality of these charming books is the unwavering commitment to a larger purpose; the casual disregard, indeed, the outright rejection of fame, unless it came through honest means; the humble modesty that even in the final years of his life made him astonished that he could be the one whose arrival in the crowded halls of London and Birmingham would spark ten minutes of sustained cheering; the refusal to pit art against money; the reluctance to accept the commands of a king unless his artistic conscience agreed; and the pure integrity, not only of his life but of his thoughts. How he criticizes Donizetti’s obsession with money and laziness! How his criticism condemns the immorality of the French opera, and how his entire being detests the sensuality of that stage! How resolutely he refuses to write an opera until the perfect libretto he patiently waited for years to create could be ready! We wish our religious organizations would share some of this man’s letters and spread them across the country: they would indeed be "leaves for the healing of the nations."

There is one lesson which may be learned from Mendelssohn's career, which is exceptionably rare: it is that Providence does sometimes bless a man every way,—giving him all good and no evil. Where shall we look in actual or historic experience to find a parallel to Mendelssohn in this? He had beauty: Chorley says he never looked upon a handsomer face. He had grace and elegance. He spoke four languages with perfect ease, read Greek and Latin with facility, drew skilfully, was familiar with the sciences, and never found himself at a loss with professed naturalists. He was a member of one of the most distinguished families of Germany: his grandfather being Moses Mendelssohn, the philosopher; his father, a leading banker; his uncle Bartholdy, a great patron of art in Rome, while he was Prussian minister there; his brother-in-law Hensel, Court painter; both his sisters and his brother Paul occupying leading social positions. He was heir-apparent to a great estate. He was greeted with the applause of England from the outset of his career; "awoke famous," after the production of the "Midsummer Overture," while almost a boy; never had a piece fall short of triumphant success; in fact, so commanding prestige that he could find not one who would rationally blame or criticize him,—a "most wearying" thing, he writes, that every piece he brought out was always "wonderfully fine." He was loved by all, and envied by none; the pet and joy of Goethe, who lived to see his expectation of Mendelssohn on the road to ample fulfilment; blessed entirely in his family, "the course of true love" running "smooth" from beginning to end; well, agile, strong; and more than all this, having a childlike religious faith in Christ, and as happy as a child in his piety. His life was cloudless; those checks and compensations with which Providence breaks up others' lot were wanting to his. We never knew any one like him in this, but the childlike, sunny Carl Ritter.

There’s one lesson that can be learned from Mendelssohn’s career that is exceptionally rare: sometimes, Providence really does bless a person in every way, giving them all good and no bad. Where can we look in real life or history to find someone like Mendelssohn? He had beauty: Chorley said he had never seen a more handsome face. He had grace and elegance. He spoke four languages with perfect ease, read Greek and Latin effortlessly, was a skilled artist, was knowledgeable in the sciences, and never felt out of place among professional naturalists. He came from one of the most distinguished families in Germany: his grandfather was Moses Mendelssohn, the philosopher; his father was a leading banker; his uncle Bartholdy was a great patron of art in Rome while serving as Prussian minister there; his brother-in-law Hensel was the Court painter; both his sisters and his brother Paul held prominent positions in society. He was set to inherit a great estate. He received applause from England right from the start of his career; he "awoke famous" after the production of the "Midsummer Overture," while still quite young; never did a piece of his fail to achieve triumphant success; in fact, he had such commanding prestige that he couldn’t find anyone who would reasonably blame or criticize him, which he described as a "most wearying" thing, since every piece he presented was always "wonderfully fine." He was loved by all and envied by none; he was the favorite and joy of Goethe, who lived to see his hopes for Mendelssohn come to fruition; he was completely blessed in his family, experiencing "the course of true love" running "smooth" from start to finish; he was well, agile, strong; and more importantly, he had a childlike faith in Christ, happy in his piety just like a child. His life was without clouds; the challenges and ups and downs that Providence often uses to shape others’ lives were absent from his. We’ve never known anyone like him in this, except the childlike, sunny Carl Ritter.

We still lack a biography of Mendelssohn which shall portray him from without, as these volumes do from within. We learn that one is in preparation; and when that is given to the public, one more rich life will be embalmed in the memories of all good men.

We still don't have a biography of Mendelssohn that shows him from an outside perspective, like these volumes do from the inside. We hear that one is being prepared, and when it's released to the public, another remarkable life will be preserved in the memories of all good people.

We ought not to overlook the unique elegance of these two volumes. Like all the publications of Mr. Leypoldt, they are printed in small, round letter; and the whole appearance is creditable to the publisher's taste. The American edition entirely eclipses the English in this regard. Though not advertised profusely, the merit of these Letters has already given them entrance and welcome into our most cultivated circles: but we bespeak for them a larger audience still; for they are books which our young men, our young women, our pastors, our whole thoughtful and aspiring community, ought to read and circulate.

We shouldn't overlook the unique elegance of these two volumes. Like all of Mr. Leypoldt's publications, they are printed in a small, round font, and the overall look reflects the publisher's good taste. The American edition completely outshines the English one in this respect. Although not heavily promoted, the quality of these Letters has already allowed them to find a place and be welcomed in our most cultured circles. However, we believe they deserve an even broader audience; these are books that our young men, young women, pastors, and our entire thoughtful and ambitious community should read and share.


RECENT AMERICAN PUBLICATIONS.

Familiar Letters from Europe. By Cornelius Conway Felton, late President of Harvard University. Boston. Ticknor & Fields. 16mo. pp. 392. $1.50.

Familiar Letters from Europe. By Cornelius Conway Felton, former President of Harvard University. Boston. Ticknor & Fields. 16mo. pp. 392. $1.50.

Life and Campaigns of George B. McClellen, Major-General U.S. Army. By G. S. Hillard. Philadelphia. J.B. Lippincott & Co. 12mo. pp. 396. $1.50.

Life and Campaigns of George B. McClellen, Major-General U.S. Army. By G. S. Hillard. Philadelphia. J.B. Lippincott & Co. 12mo. pp. 396. $1.50.

The Classification of the Sciences: To which are added Reasons for dissenting from the Philosophy of M. Comte. By Herbert Spencer, Author of "Illustrations of Universal Progress," etc. New York. D. Appleton & Co. 16mo. paper, pp. 48. 25 cts.

The Classification of the Sciences: Along with Reasons for Disagreeing with the Philosophy of M. Comte. By Herbert Spencer, Author of "Illustrations of Universal Progress," etc. New York. D. Appleton & Co. 16mo. paper, pp. 48. 25 cts.

The Trial: More Links of the Daisy Chain. By the Author of "The Heir of Redclyffe." Two Volumes in One. New York. D. Appleton & Co. 16mo. paper. pp. 389. $1.75.

The Trial: More Links of the Daisy Chain. By the Author of "The Heir of Redclyffe." Two Volumes in One. New York. D. Appleton & Co. 16mo. paper. pp. 389. $1.75.

Fireside Travels. By James Russell Lowell. Boston. Ticknor & Fields. 16mo. pp. 324. $1.75.

Fireside Travels. By James Russell Lowell. Boston. Ticknor & Fields. 16mo. pp. 324. $1.75.

Memoir of Mrs. Caroline P. Keith, Missionary of the Protestant Episcopal Church to China. Edited by her Brother, William C. Tenney. New York, D. Appleton & Co. 16mo. pp. x., 392. $2.00.

Memoir of Mrs. Caroline P. Keith, Missionary of the Protestant Episcopal Church to China. Edited by her brother, William C. Tenney. New York, D. Appleton & Co. 16mo. pp. x., 392. $2.00.

The Haunted Tower. By Mrs. Henry Wood. Philadelphia. T. B. Peterson & Brothers. 8vo. paper. pp. 150. 50 cts.

The Haunted Tower. By Mrs. Henry Wood. Philadelphia. T. B. Peterson & Brothers. 8vo. paper. pp. 150. 50 cents.

Emily Chester. A Novel. Boston. Ticknor & Fields. 12mo. pp. 367. $1.75.

Emily Chester. A Novel. Boston. Ticknor & Fields. 12mo. pp. 367. $1.75.

Religion and Chemistry; or, Proofs of God's Plan in the Atmosphere and its Elements. Ten Lectures, delivered at the Brooklyn Institute, Brooklyn, N.Y., on the Graham Foundation. By Josiah P. Cooke, Jr., Erving Professor of Chemistry and Mineralogy in Harvard University. New York. Charles Scribner. 8vo. pp. viii., 348. $3.50.

Religion and Chemistry; or, Proofs of God's Plan in the Atmosphere and its Elements. Ten Lectures, delivered at the Brooklyn Institute, Brooklyn, N.Y., on the Graham Foundation. By Josiah P. Cooke, Jr., Erving Professor of Chemistry and Mineralogy at Harvard University. New York. Charles Scribner. 8vo. pp. viii., 348. $3.50.

Poems of the War. By George H. Baker. Boston. Ticknor & Fields. 16mo. pp. vi., 202. $1.50.

Poems of the War. By George H. Baker. Boston. Ticknor & Fields. 16mo. pp. vi., 202. $1.50.

Modern Philology: Its Discoveries, History, and Influence. By Benjamin W. Dwight. Second Series. New York. Charles Scribner. 8vo. pp. xviii., 554. $6.00.

Modern Philology: Its Discoveries, History, and Influence. By Benjamin W. Dwight. Second Series. New York. Charles Scribner. 8vo. pp. xviii., 554. $6.00.

The Ocean Waifs. A Story of Adventure on Land and Sea. By Captain Mayne Reid. With Illustrations. Boston. Ticknor & Fields. 16mo. pp. 367. $1.50.

The Ocean Waifs. A Story of Adventure on Land and Sea. By Captain Mayne Reid. With Illustrations. Boston. Ticknor & Fields. 16mo. pp. 367. $1.50.

Philosophy as Absolute Science, founded in the Universal Laws of Being, and including Ontology, Theology, and Psychology, made One, as Spirit, Soul, and Body. By E. L. and A. L. Frothingham. Volume I. Boston. Walker, Wise, & Co. 8vo. pp. xxxiv., 453. $3.50.

Philosophy as Absolute Science, based on the Universal Laws of Being, which encompasses Ontology, Theology, and Psychology, unified as Spirit, Soul, and Body. By E. L. and A. L. Frothingham. Volume I. Boston. Walker, Wise, & Co. 8vo. pp. xxxiv., 453. $3.50.

Life of Jean Paul Frederic Richter: Compiled from Various Sources. Preceded by his Autobiography. By Eliza Buckminster Lee. Boston. Ticknor & Fields. 12mo. pp. xvi., 539. $2.00.

Life of Jean Paul Frederic Richter: Compiled from Various Sources. Preceded by his Autobiography. By Eliza Buckminster Lee. Boston. Ticknor & Fields. 12mo. pp. xvi., 539. $2.00.

The Winthrops. A Novel. New York, Carleton. 16mo. pp. 319. $1.75.

The Winthrops. A Novel. New York, Carleton. 16mo. pp. 319. $1.75.

The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-1864: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: intended to exhibit especially its Moral and Political Phases, with the Drift and Progress of American Opinion respecting Human Slavery, from 1776 to the Close of the War for the Union. By Horace Greeley. Illustrated by Portraits on Steel of Generals, Statesmen, and other Eminent Men; Views of Places of Historic Interest, Maps, Diagrams of Battle-Fields, Naval Actions, etc.: from Official Sources. Volume I. Hartford. A. D. Case & Co. 8vo. pp. 648. $3.00.

The American Conflict: A History of the Great Rebellion in the United States of America, 1860-1864: its Causes, Incidents, and Results: aimed to highlight particularly its Moral and Political Phases, along with the Evolution and Shifts in American Opinion regarding Human Slavery, from 1776 to the End of the War for the Union. By Horace Greeley. Illustrated with Steel Portraits of Generals, Statesmen, and other Notable Figures; Views of Historically Significant Places, Maps, Diagrams of Battlefields, Naval Engagements, etc.: sourced from Official Records. Volume I. Hartford. A. D. Case & Co. 8vo. pp. 648. $3.00.

The Voice of Blood, in the Sphere of Nature and of the Spirit World. By Rev. Samuel Phillips, A.M. Philadelphia. Lindsay & Blakiston. 12mo. pp. xvi., 384.

The Voice of Blood, in the Realm of Nature and the Spirit World. By Rev. Samuel Phillips, A.M. Philadelphia. Lindsay & Blakiston. 12mo. pp. xvi., 384.

The Suppressed Book about Slavery. Prepared for Publication in 1857,—never published until the Present Time. New York. Carleton. 16mo. pp. 432. $2.00.

The Suppressed Book about Slavery. Prepared for Publication in 1857,—never published until Now. New York. Carleton. 16mo. pp. 432. $2.00.

Nearer and Dearer. A Novelette. By Cuthbert Bede, B.A., Author of "Verdant Green." New York, Carleton. 16mo. pp. xi., 225. $1.50.

Nearer and Dearer. A Novelette. By Cuthbert Bede, B.A., Author of "Verdant Green." New York, Carleton. 16mo. pp. xi., 225. $1.50.

Annals of the English Stage, from Thomas Betterton to Edmund Kean. By Dr. Doran, F.S.A., Author of "Table Traits," etc. New York. W. J. Widdleton. 2 vols. 8vo. pp. 424, 422. $4.50.

Annals of the English Stage, from Thomas Betterton to Edmund Kean. By Dr. Doran, F.S.A., Author of "Table Traits," etc. New York. W. J. Widdleton. 2 vols. 8vo. pp. 424, 422. $4.50.

A Report of the Debates and Proceedings in the Secret Sessions of the Conference Convention, for proposing Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, held at Washington, D.C., in February, A.D. 1861. By L. E. Chittenden, One of the Delegates. New York. D. Appleton & Co. 8vo. pp. 626. $5.00.

A Report on the Debates and Proceedings in the Secret Sessions of the Conference Convention, for proposing Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, held in Washington, D.C., in February, 1861. By L. E. Chittenden, one of the delegates. New York: D. Appleton & Co. 8vo. pp. 626. $5.00.




        
        
    
Download ePUB

If you like this ebook, consider a donation!