This is a modern-English version of The Papers and Writings of Abraham Lincoln — Volume 7: 1863-1865, originally written by Lincoln, Abraham.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
THE PAPERS AND WRITINGS OF ABRAHAM LINCOLN
VOLUME SEVEN
CONSTITUTIONAL EDITION
Edited by Arthur Brooks Lapsley
CONTENTS
THE WRITINGS OF A. LINCOLN, Volume Seven, 1863-1865
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 3, 1863.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL A. E. BURNSIDE. WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, November
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. G. MEADE.
ORDER CONCERNING THE EXPORT OF TOBACCO PURCHASED BY FOREIGN NATIONS.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL SCHOFIELD.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL SCHOFIELD.
TELEGRAM to E. H. AND E. JAMESON.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. ROSECRANS.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF UNION SUCCESS IN EAST TENNESSEE.
PROCLAMATION OF AMNESTY AND RECONSTRUCTION. DECEMBER 8, 1863.
ANNUAL MESSAGE TO CONGRESS, DECEMBER 8, 1863.
MESSAGE TO CONGRESS. WASHINGTON D. C., December 8, 1863.
MESSAGE TO THE SENATE. WASHINGTON, D. C., December 8, 1863.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING DISCRIMINATING DUTIES, DECEMBER 16, 1863.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO MILITARY COMMANDER AT POINT LOOKOUT.
TELEGRAM TO MILITARY COMMANDER AT POINT LOOKOUT.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR PIERPOINT.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BROUGH. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 15,
MESSAGE TO CONGRESS, JANUARY 20, 1864
ORDER APPROVING TRADE REGULATIONS.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE.
ORDER FOR A DRAFT OF FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND MEN.
THE STORY OF THE EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING BLOCKADE, FEBRUARY 18, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL ROSECRANS.
DESERTERS DEATH SENTENCES REMITTED
ORDER IN REGARD TO THE EXPORTATION OF TOBACCO BELONGING TO THE FRENCH
TELEGRAM TO UNITED STATES MARSHAL, LOUISVILLE.
ORDER ASSIGNING U. S. GRANT COMMAND OF THE ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES.
CALL FOR TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND MEN.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
PASS FOR GENERAL D. E. SICKLES.
REMARKS AT A FAIR IN THE PATENT OFFICE,
REPLY TO A COMMITTEE FROM THE WORKINGMEN'S ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK,
CORRESPONDENCE WITH GENERAL C. SCHURZ.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER COMMANDING AT FORT WARREN.
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER COMMANDING AT FORT WARREN.
INDORSEMENT ON OFFER OF TROOPS, APRIL 23, 1864.
MESSAGE TO CONGRESS, APRIL 28, 1864.
MESSAGE TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
MESSAGE TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL ROSECRANS.
RECOMMENDATION OF THANKSGIVING.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL LEW WALLACE.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. ROSECRANS,
RESPONSE TO A METHODIST DELEGATION, MAY 14, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR YATES. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May 18, 1864.
ARREST AND IMPRISONMENT OF IRRESPONSIBLE NEWSPAPER REPORTERS AND EDITORS
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL B. P. BUTLER.
ORDER CONCERNING THE EXEMPTION OF AMERICAN CONSULS FROM MILITARY SERVICE
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR MORTON AND OTHERS. EXECUTIVE MANSION, May 21, 1864
TELEGRAM TO CHRISTIANA A. SACK. WAR DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON, D. C., May 21,
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BROUGH. WASHINGTON CITY, May 24, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May 25,1864.
MEMORANDUM CONCERNING THE TRANSPORTATION OF THE NEW YORK NAVAL BRIGADE.
INDORSEMENT ON A LETTER TOUCHING THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, June 6, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. ROSECRANS. WASHINGTON, June 8, 1864.
REPLY TO THE COMMITTEE NOTIFYING PRESIDENT LINCOLN OF HIS RENOMINATION,
PLATFORM OF THE UNION NATIONAL CONVENTION HELD IN BALTIMORE, MD., JUNE 7
REPLY TO A DELEGATION FROM THE NATIONAL UNION LEAGUE,
REPLY TO A DELEGATION FROM OHIO,
ADDRESS TO THE ENVOY FROM THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL L. THOMAS. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, June 13,
TELEGRAM TO THOMAS WEBSTER. WASHINGTON, D. C., June 13, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, June 15, 1864. 7 A.M.
ADDRESS AT A SANITARY FAIR IN PHILADELPHIA,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. ROSECRANS. WASHINGTON, June 24, 1864.
LETTER ACCEPTING THE NOMINATION FOR PRESIDENT.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL GRANT. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, June 29, 1864.
FROM SECRETARY STANTON TO GOVERNOR SEYMOUR.
PROCLAMATION SUSPENDING THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,
PROCLAMATION FOR A DAY OF PRAYER, JULY 7, 1864.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING A BILL "TO GUARANTEE TO CERTAIN STATES,
TELEGRAM TO J. W. GARRETT. WASHINGTON, D. C., July 9, 1864
TELEGRAM FROM GENERAL HALLECK TO GENERAL WALLACE.
TELEGRAM TO T. SWAN AND OTHERS. WASHINGTON, D. C., July 10, 1864. 9.20
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON CITY, July TO, 1864.2 P.M.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, July 11, 1864. 8 A.M.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., July 12, 1864. 11.30
TELEGRAM AND LETTER TO HORACE GREELEY. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, July
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, JULY 15, 1864.
SAFE CONDUCT FOR CLEMENT C. CLAY AND OTHERS,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. [WASHINGTON] July 17. 1864. 11.25 A.M.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL D. HUNTER WASHINGTON JULY 17, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN.
ANNOUNCEMENT CONCERNING TERMS OF PEACE.
PROCLAMATION CALLING FOR FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND VOLUNTEERS,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL D. HUNTER. (Cipher.)
TO GOVERNOR CURTIN, ENCLOSING A LETTER TO WILLIAM O. SNIDER.
FROM JOHN HAY TO J. C. WELLING.
TO COLONEL, FIRST N. Y. VETERAN CAVALRY.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN.
FROM SECRETARY STANTON TO GENERAL HALLECK.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR JOHNSON. WASHINGTON, July 27, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U, S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN.
ENDORSEMENT OF APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT, AUGUST 15, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING COMMERCIAL REGULATIONS, AUGUST 18, 1864.
INDORSEMENT CONCERNING AN EXCHANGE OF PRISONERS, AUGUST 18, 1864.
ADDRESS TO THE 164TH OHIO REGIMENT,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BUTLER. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., August
ADDRESS TO THE 166TH OHIO REGIMENT,
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR JOHNSON. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, August 26,
TELEGRAM TO B. H. BREWSTER. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., August
ORDERS OF GRATITUDE AND REJOICING.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, September 3, 1864.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, September 3, 1864.
REPLY TO A COMMITTEE OF COLORED PEOPLE FROM BALTIMORE
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR PICKERING.
ORDER OF THANKS TO HUNDRED-DAY TROOPS FROM OHIO.
TELEGRAM TO JAMES G. BLAINE. WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., September
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN. WASHINGTON, D. C., September 17,1864.
INDORSEMENT CONCERNING AN EXCHANGE OF PRISONERS, SEPTEMBER 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL P. SHERIDAN. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, September
ORDER CONCERNING THE PURCHASE OF PRODUCTS IN INSURRECTIONARY STATES.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN. WASHINGTON, D. C., September 27, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D.C., September 29,1864.
ORDER RETURNING THANKS TO THE VOLUNTEERS FOR ONE HUNDRED DAYS
INDORSEMENT ON A MEMORANDUM BY GENERAL McDOWELL, OCTOBER 7, 1864
TELEGRAM TO ROBERT T. LINCOLN, Cambridge, Mass.:
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., October 12, 1864.
PROCLAMATION OF THANKSGIVING, OCTOBER 20, 1864.
TELEGRAM To J. G. NICOLAY. WASHINGTON, D. C., October 21, 1864. 9.45 P.M.
TO WILLIAM B. CAMPBELL AND OTHERS.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. H. THOMAS. WASHINGTON, D. C., October 23, 1864 5
TELEGRAM TO T. T. DAVIS. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D.C., October 31,
PROCLAMATION ADMITTING NEVADA INTO THE UNION
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BURBRIDGE.
TELEGRAM TO NAVAL OFFICER AT MOBILE BAY.
TELEGRAM TO SAILORS' FAIR, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY SEWARD. WASHINGTON, November 8, 1864.
RESPONSE TO A SERENADE, NOVEMBER 9, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO H. W. HOFFMAN. WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C. November 10,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL S. O. BURBRIDGE. WASHINGTON, D.C., November 10, 1864.
WASHINGTON, D.C., November 10, 1864. GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE, Frankfort, Ky.:
REPLY TO MARYLAND UNION COMMITTEE, NOVEMBER 17, 1864.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING BLOCKADE, NOVEMBER 19, 1864
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE. WASHINGTON, D. C. NOVEMBER 22, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR CURTIN, WASHINGTON, D.C., NOVEMBER 25, 1864
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL ROSECRANS. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON D.C., NOV.
ORDER CONCERNING THE STEAMER "FUNAYMA SOLACE."
RESPONSE TO A SERENADE, DECEMBER 6, 1864.
ORDER APPOINTING COMMISSIONERS
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G, H. THOMAS. WASHINGTON, D.C., December 16, 1864.
ORIGIN OF THE "GREENBACK" CURRENCY
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER IN COMMAND AT CHATTANOOGA. EXECUTIVE MANSION,
CALL FOR 300,000 VOLUNTEERS, DECEMBER 19, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER IN COMMAND AT LEXINGTON.
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER IN COMMAND AT NASHVILLE.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
MESSAGE TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING COMMERCE, JANUARY 10, 1865.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL B. F. BUTLER.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL B. F. BUTLER.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. M. DODGE. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January
FIRST OVERTURES FOR SURRENDER FROM DAVIS
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. M. DODGE.
REPLY TO A COMMITTEE, JANUARY 24, 1865.
EARLY CONSULTATIONS WITH REBELS
TELEGRAM FROM SECRETARY OF WAR TO GENERAL ORD.
INDORSEMENT ON A LETTER FROM J. M. ASHLEY.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SECRETARY SEWARD.
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT FOR THE ABOLISHING OF SLAVERY
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, February 1, 1865
TELEGRAM TO MAJOR ECKERT. WASHINGTON, D. C., February 1, 1865.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., February 2, 1865
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY SEWARD, WASHINGTON, D. C., February 2, 1865.
ORDER TO MAKE CORRECTIONS IN THE DRAFT.
TELEGRAM TO LIEUTENANT-COLONEL GLENN.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February
CHRONOLOGIC REVIEW OF PEACE PROPOSALS
Afterwards Mr. Blair dictated for and authorized me to make an entry on
Afterwards the Secretary of War placed in my hands the following telegram,
MESSAGE TO THE SENATE. WASHINGTON, February 10, 1865
TO THE COMMANDING OFFICERS IN WEST TENNESSEE
PROCLAMATION CONVENING THE SENATE IN EXTRA SESSION,
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER IN COMMAND AT HARPER'S FERRY.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, February 25, 1865
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., February 27, 1865.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., March 2, 1865.
TELEGRAM FROM SECRETARY STANTON TO GENERAL GRANT.
SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS, MARCH 4, 1865.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL JOHN POPE.
TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., March 8, 1865.
PROCLAMATION OFFERING PARDON TO DESERTERS,
TELEGRAM TO COLONEL ROUGH AND OTHERS.
ADDRESS TO AN INDIANA REGIMENT,
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING INDIANS,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. HANCOCK.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. CITY POINT, April 1, 1865.
TELEGRAMS TO SECRETARY STANTON. CITY POINT, VIRGINIA, April 2, 1865. 8.30
TELEGRAM TO MRS. LINCOLN. CITY POINT, VA., April 1, 1865.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. WEITZEL.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
NOTE ON A CARD TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. H. GORDON.
PROCLAMATION CLOSING CERTAIN PORTS, APRIL 11, 1865.
PROCLAMATION OPENING THE PORT OF KEY WEST,
PROCLAMATION CLAIMING EQUALITY OF RIGHTS WITH ALL MARITIME NATIONS,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. WEITZEL.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. WEITZEL. WASHINGTON, D.C., April 12, 1865.
INTERVIEW WITH SCHUYLER COLFAX ON THE MORNING OF APRIL 14, 1865.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
THE WRITINGS OF A. LINCOLN, Volume Seven, 1863-1865
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 3, 1863.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL A. E. BURNSIDE. WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, November
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. G. MEADE.
ORDER CONCERNING THE EXPORT OF TOBACCO PURCHASED BY FOREIGN NATIONS.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL SCHOFIELD.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL SCHOFIELD.
TELEGRAM to E. H. AND E. JAMESON.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. ROSECRANS.
ANNOUNCEMENT OF UNION SUCCESS IN EAST TENNESSEE.
PROCLAMATION OF AMNESTY AND RECONSTRUCTION. DECEMBER 8, 1863.
ANNUAL MESSAGE TO CONGRESS, DECEMBER 8, 1863.
MESSAGE TO CONGRESS. WASHINGTON D. C., December 8, 1863.
MESSAGE TO THE SENATE. WASHINGTON, D. C., December 8, 1863.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING DISCRIMINATING DUTIES, DECEMBER 16, 1863.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO MILITARY COMMANDER AT POINT LOOKOUT.
TELEGRAM TO MILITARY COMMANDER AT POINT LOOKOUT.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR PIERPOINT.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BROUGH. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 15,
MESSAGE TO CONGRESS, JANUARY 20, 1864
ORDER APPROVING TRADE REGULATIONS.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE.
ORDER FOR A DRAFT OF FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND MEN.
THE STORY OF THE EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING BLOCKADE, FEBRUARY 18, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL ROSECRANS.
DESERTERS DEATH SENTENCES REMITTED
ORDER IN REGARD TO THE EXPORTATION OF TOBACCO BELONGING TO THE FRENCH
TELEGRAM TO UNITED STATES MARSHAL, LOUISVILLE.
ORDER ASSIGNING U. S. GRANT COMMAND OF THE ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES.
CALL FOR TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND MEN.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
PASS FOR GENERAL D. E. SICKLES.
REMARKS AT A FAIR IN THE PATENT OFFICE,
REPLY TO A COMMITTEE FROM THE WORKINGMEN'S ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK,
CORRESPONDENCE WITH GENERAL C. SCHURZ.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER COMMANDING AT FORT WARREN.
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER COMMANDING AT FORT WARREN.
INDORSEMENT ON OFFER OF TROOPS, APRIL 23, 1864.
MESSAGE TO CONGRESS, APRIL 28, 1864.
MESSAGE TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
MESSAGE TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL ROSECRANS.
RECOMMENDATION OF THANKSGIVING.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL LEW WALLACE.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. ROSECRANS,
RESPONSE TO A METHODIST DELEGATION, MAY 14, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR YATES. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May 18, 1864.
ARREST AND IMPRISONMENT OF IRRESPONSIBLE NEWSPAPER REPORTERS AND EDITORS
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL B. P. BUTLER.
ORDER CONCERNING THE EXEMPTION OF AMERICAN CONSULS FROM MILITARY SERVICE
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR MORTON AND OTHERS. EXECUTIVE MANSION, May 21, 1864
TELEGRAM TO CHRISTIANA A. SACK. WAR DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON, D. C., May 21,
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BROUGH. WASHINGTON CITY, May 24, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May 25,1864.
MEMORANDUM CONCERNING THE TRANSPORTATION OF THE NEW YORK NAVAL BRIGADE.
INDORSEMENT ON A LETTER TOUCHING THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, June 6, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. ROSECRANS. WASHINGTON, June 8, 1864.
REPLY TO THE COMMITTEE NOTIFYING PRESIDENT LINCOLN OF HIS RENOMINATION,
PLATFORM OF THE UNION NATIONAL CONVENTION HELD IN BALTIMORE, MD., JUNE 7
REPLY TO A DELEGATION FROM THE NATIONAL UNION LEAGUE,
REPLY TO A DELEGATION FROM OHIO,
ADDRESS TO THE ENVOY FROM THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL L. THOMAS. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, June 13,
TELEGRAM TO THOMAS WEBSTER. WASHINGTON, D. C., June 13, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, June 15, 1864. 7 A.M.
ADDRESS AT A SANITARY FAIR IN PHILADELPHIA,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. ROSECRANS. WASHINGTON, June 24, 1864.
LETTER ACCEPTING THE NOMINATION FOR PRESIDENT.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL GRANT. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, June 29, 1864.
FROM SECRETARY STANTON TO GOVERNOR SEYMOUR.
PROCLAMATION SUSPENDING THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,
PROCLAMATION FOR A DAY OF PRAYER, JULY 7, 1864.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING A BILL "TO GUARANTEE TO CERTAIN STATES,
TELEGRAM TO J. W. GARRETT. WASHINGTON, D. C., July 9, 1864
TELEGRAM FROM GENERAL HALLECK TO GENERAL WALLACE.
TELEGRAM TO T. SWAN AND OTHERS. WASHINGTON, D. C., July 10, 1864. 9.20
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON CITY, July TO, 1864.2 P.M.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, July 11, 1864. 8 A.M.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., July 12, 1864. 11.30
TELEGRAM AND LETTER TO HORACE GREELEY. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, July
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, JULY 15, 1864.
SAFE CONDUCT FOR CLEMENT C. CLAY AND OTHERS,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. [WASHINGTON] July 17. 1864. 11.25 A.M.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL D. HUNTER WASHINGTON JULY 17, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN.
ANNOUNCEMENT CONCERNING TERMS OF PEACE.
PROCLAMATION CALLING FOR FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND VOLUNTEERS,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL D. HUNTER. (Cipher.)
TO GOVERNOR CURTIN, ENCLOSING A LETTER TO WILLIAM O. SNIDER.
FROM JOHN HAY TO J. C. WELLING.
TO COLONEL, FIRST N. Y. VETERAN CAVALRY.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN.
FROM SECRETARY STANTON TO GENERAL HALLECK.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR JOHNSON. WASHINGTON, July 27, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U, S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN.
ENDORSEMENT OF APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT, AUGUST 15, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING COMMERCIAL REGULATIONS, AUGUST 18, 1864.
INDORSEMENT CONCERNING AN EXCHANGE OF PRISONERS, AUGUST 18, 1864.
ADDRESS TO THE 164TH OHIO REGIMENT,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BUTLER. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., August
ADDRESS TO THE 166TH OHIO REGIMENT,
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR JOHNSON. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, August 26,
TELEGRAM TO B. H. BREWSTER. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., August
ORDERS OF GRATITUDE AND REJOICING.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, September 3, 1864.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, September 3, 1864.
REPLY TO A COMMITTEE OF COLORED PEOPLE FROM BALTIMORE
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR PICKERING.
ORDER OF THANKS TO HUNDRED-DAY TROOPS FROM OHIO.
TELEGRAM TO JAMES G. BLAINE. WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., September
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN. WASHINGTON, D. C., September 17,1864.
INDORSEMENT CONCERNING AN EXCHANGE OF PRISONERS, SEPTEMBER 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL P. SHERIDAN. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, September
ORDER CONCERNING THE PURCHASE OF PRODUCTS IN INSURRECTIONARY STATES.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN. WASHINGTON, D. C., September 27, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D.C., September 29,1864.
ORDER RETURNING THANKS TO THE VOLUNTEERS FOR ONE HUNDRED DAYS
INDORSEMENT ON A MEMORANDUM BY GENERAL McDOWELL, OCTOBER 7, 1864
TELEGRAM TO ROBERT T. LINCOLN, Cambridge, Mass.:
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., October 12, 1864.
PROCLAMATION OF THANKSGIVING, OCTOBER 20, 1864.
TELEGRAM To J. G. NICOLAY. WASHINGTON, D. C., October 21, 1864. 9.45 P.M.
TO WILLIAM B. CAMPBELL AND OTHERS.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. H. THOMAS. WASHINGTON, D. C., October 23, 1864 5
TELEGRAM TO T. T. DAVIS. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D.C., October 31,
PROCLAMATION ADMITTING NEVADA INTO THE UNION
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BURBRIDGE.
TELEGRAM TO NAVAL OFFICER AT MOBILE BAY.
TELEGRAM TO SAILORS' FAIR, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY SEWARD. WASHINGTON, November 8, 1864.
RESPONSE TO A SERENADE, NOVEMBER 9, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO H. W. HOFFMAN. WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C. November 10,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL S. O. BURBRIDGE. WASHINGTON, D.C., November 10, 1864.
WASHINGTON, D.C., November 10, 1864. GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE, Frankfort, Ky.:
REPLY TO MARYLAND UNION COMMITTEE, NOVEMBER 17, 1864.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING BLOCKADE, NOVEMBER 19, 1864
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE. WASHINGTON, D. C. NOVEMBER 22, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR CURTIN, WASHINGTON, D.C., NOVEMBER 25, 1864
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL ROSECRANS. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON D.C., NOV.
ORDER CONCERNING THE STEAMER "FUNAYMA SOLACE."
RESPONSE TO A SERENADE, DECEMBER 6, 1864.
ORDER APPOINTING COMMISSIONERS
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G, H. THOMAS. WASHINGTON, D.C., December 16, 1864.
ORIGIN OF THE "GREENBACK" CURRENCY
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER IN COMMAND AT CHATTANOOGA. EXECUTIVE MANSION,
CALL FOR 300,000 VOLUNTEERS, DECEMBER 19, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER IN COMMAND AT LEXINGTON.
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER IN COMMAND AT NASHVILLE.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
MESSAGE TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING COMMERCE, JANUARY 10, 1865.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL B. F. BUTLER.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL B. F. BUTLER.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. M. DODGE. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January
FIRST OVERTURES FOR SURRENDER FROM DAVIS
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. M. DODGE.
REPLY TO A COMMITTEE, JANUARY 24, 1865.
EARLY CONSULTATIONS WITH REBELS
TELEGRAM FROM SECRETARY OF WAR TO GENERAL ORD.
INDORSEMENT ON A LETTER FROM J. M. ASHLEY.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SECRETARY SEWARD.
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT FOR THE ABOLISHING OF SLAVERY
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, February 1, 1865
TELEGRAM TO MAJOR ECKERT. WASHINGTON, D. C., February 1, 1865.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., February 2, 1865
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY SEWARD, WASHINGTON, D. C., February 2, 1865.
ORDER TO MAKE CORRECTIONS IN THE DRAFT.
TELEGRAM TO LIEUTENANT-COLONEL GLENN.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February
CHRONOLOGIC REVIEW OF PEACE PROPOSALS
Afterwards Mr. Blair dictated for and authorized me to make an entry on
Afterwards the Secretary of War placed in my hands the following telegram,
MESSAGE TO THE SENATE. WASHINGTON, February 10, 1865
TO THE COMMANDING OFFICERS IN WEST TENNESSEE
PROCLAMATION CONVENING THE SENATE IN EXTRA SESSION,
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER IN COMMAND AT HARPER'S FERRY.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, February 25, 1865
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., February 27, 1865.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., March 2, 1865.
TELEGRAM FROM SECRETARY STANTON TO GENERAL GRANT.
SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS, MARCH 4, 1865.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL JOHN POPE.
TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., March 8, 1865.
PROCLAMATION OFFERING PARDON TO DESERTERS,
TELEGRAM TO COLONEL ROUGH AND OTHERS.
ADDRESS TO AN INDIANA REGIMENT,
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING INDIANS,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. HANCOCK.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. CITY POINT, April 1, 1865.
TELEGRAMS TO SECRETARY STANTON. CITY POINT, VIRGINIA, April 2, 1865. 8.30
TELEGRAM TO MRS. LINCOLN. CITY POINT, VA., April 1, 1865.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. WEITZEL.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
NOTE ON A CARD TO SECRETARY STANTON.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. H. GORDON.
PROCLAMATION CLOSING CERTAIN PORTS, APRIL 11, 1865.
PROCLAMATION OPENING THE PORT OF KEY WEST,
PROCLAMATION CLAIMING EQUALITY OF RIGHTS WITH ALL MARITIME NATIONS,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. WEITZEL.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. WEITZEL. WASHINGTON, D.C., April 12, 1865.
INTERVIEW WITH SCHUYLER COLFAX ON THE MORNING OF APRIL 14, 1865.
THE WRITINGS OF A. LINCOLN,
Volume Seven, 1863-1865
1863
OPINION ON THE LOSS OF GENERAL R. H. MILROY'S DIVISION.
OPINION ON THE LOSS OF GENERAL R. H. MILROY'S DIVISION.
October 27, 1863.
October 27, 1863.
In June last a division was substantially lost at or near Winchester, Va. At the time, it was under General Milroy as immediate commander in the field, General Schenck as department commander at Baltimore, and General Halleck as general-in-chief at Washington.
In June last year, a division was significantly lost at or near Winchester, VA. At that time, it was under General Milroy as the immediate commander in the field, General Schenck as the department commander in Baltimore, and General Halleck as the general-in-chief in Washington.
General Milroy, as immediate commander, was put in arrest, and subsequently a court of inquiry examined chiefly with reference to disobedience of orders, and reported the evidence.
General Milroy, as the immediate commander, was placed under arrest, and later a court of inquiry was conducted primarily to investigate disobedience of orders and reported the findings.
The foregoing is a synoptical statement of the evidence, together with the judge-advocate-general's conclusions. The disaster, when it came, was a surprise to all. It was very well known to Generals Shenck and Milroy for some time before, that General Halleck thought the division was in great danger of a surprise at Winchester; that it was of no service commensurate with the risk it incurred, and that it ought to be withdrawn; but, although he more than once advised its withdrawal, he never positively ordered it. General Schenck, on the contrary, believed the service of the force at Winchester was worth the hazard, and so did not positively order its withdrawal until it was so late that the enemy cut the wire and prevented the order reaching General Milroy.
The above is a summary of the evidence, along with the conclusions from the judge-advocate-general. The disaster, when it happened, caught everyone off guard. Generals Shenck and Milroy had been aware for some time that General Halleck believed the division was at serious risk of being surprised at Winchester, that its usefulness didn't match the danger it faced, and that it should be pulled back. However, even though he suggested its withdrawal multiple times, he never officially ordered it. In contrast, General Schenck felt that keeping the force at Winchester was worth the risk, so he didn't give a firm order to withdraw until it was too late, allowing the enemy to cut the communication line and stop the order from reaching General Milroy.
General Milroy seems to have concurred with General Schenck in the opinion that the force should be kept at Winchester at least until the approach of danger, but he disobeyed no order upon the subject.
General Milroy appears to agree with General Schenck that the troops should stay in Winchester, at least until a threat arises, but he did not disobey any orders regarding this matter.
Some question can be made whether some of General Halleck's dispatches to General Schenk should not have been construed to be orders to withdraw the force, and obeyed accordingly; but no such question can be made against General Milroy. In fact, the last order he received was to be prepared to withdraw, but not to actually withdraw until further order, which further order never reached him.
Some people wonder if some of General Halleck's messages to General Schenk should have been seen as orders to pull back the troops and acted on as such; however, there’s no doubt about General Milroy. In fact, the last instruction he got was to be ready to withdraw, but not to actually leave until he received another order, which never came.
Serious blame is not necessarily due to any serious disaster, and I cannot say that in this case any of the officers are deserving of serious blame. No court-martial is deemed necessary or proper in the case.
Serious blame doesn’t always come from a major disaster, and I can't say that in this situation any of the officers deserve serious blame. No court-martial is considered necessary or appropriate in this case.
TO GENERAL SCHOFIELD.
Private and confidential
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, October 28, 1863.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, October 28, 1863.
GENERAL JOHN M. SCHOFIELD:
GENERAL JOHN M. SCHOFIELD:
There have recently reached the War Department, and thence been laid before me, from Missouri, three communications, all similar in import and identical in object. One of them, addressed to nobody, and without place or date, but having the signature of (apparently) the writer, is a letter of eight closely written foolscap pages. The other two are written by a different person, at St. Joseph, Mo., and of the dates, respectively, October 12 and 13, 1863, and each inclosing a large number of affidavits. The general statements of the whole are that the Federal and State authorities are arming the disloyal and disarming the loyal, and that the latter will all be killed or driven out of the State unless there shall be a change. In particular, no loyal man who has been disarmed is named, but the affidavits show by name forty-two persons as disloyal who have been armed. They are as follows: [The names are omitted.]
Recently, the War Department received three communications from Missouri, which have been brought to my attention. All three are similar in content and purpose. One is a letter, unsigned and lacking a specific place or date, but it appears to be from the writer, spanning eight densely written pages. The other two letters come from a different person based in St. Joseph, Missouri, dated October 12 and 13, 1863, respectively, and each includes numerous affidavits. The key points of these communications are that both Federal and State authorities are arming those who are disloyal while disarming the loyal citizens, and that the loyal ones could face being killed or forced out of the state unless conditions change. While no specific loyal individual who has been disarmed is mentioned, the affidavits identify forty-two people by name who are considered disloyal and have been armed. They are as follows: [The names are omitted.]
A majority of these are shown to have been in the rebel service. I believe it could be shown that the government here has deliberately armed more than ten times as many captured at Gettysburg, to say nothing of similar operations in East Tennessee. These papers contain altogether thirty—one manuscript pages, and one newspaper in extenso, and yet I do not find it anywhere charged in them that any loyal man has been harmed by reason of being disarmed, or that any disloyal one has harmed anybody by reason of being armed by the Federal or State Government. Of course, I have not had time to carefully examine all; but I have had most of them examined and briefed by others, and the result is as stated. The remarkable fact that the actual evil is yet only anticipated—inferred—induces me to suppose I understand the case; but I do not state my impression, because I might be mistaken, and because your duty and mine is plain in any event. The locality of nearly all this seems to be St. Joseph and Buchanan County. I wish you to give special attention to this region, particularly on election day. Prevent violence from whatever quarter, and see that the soldiers themselves do no wrong.
Most of these are shown to have been in the rebel service. I believe it can be proven that the government here has deliberately armed more than ten times as many captured at Gettysburg, not to mention similar operations in East Tennessee. These documents include a total of thirty-one manuscript pages and one complete newspaper, yet I do not find anywhere in them that any loyal person has been harmed because they were disarmed, or that any disloyal person has harmed anyone because they were armed by the Federal or State Government. Of course, I haven't had the time to thoroughly examine everything; however, I have had most of them reviewed and summarized by others, and the result is as stated. The notable fact that the actual harm is still only anticipated—implied—leads me to think I understand the situation; but I don’t express my opinion because I might be wrong, and because your duty and mine are clear in any case. The majority of this seems to be centered around St. Joseph and Buchanan County. I want you to pay special attention to this area, especially on election day. Prevent violence from any source, and make sure the soldiers themselves do not commit any wrongdoing.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR JOHNSON.
[Cipher.]
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., October 28, 1863.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., October 28, 1863.
HON. ANDREW JOHNSON, Nashville, Tenn.: If not too inconvenient, please come at once and have a personal conversation with me.
HON. ANDREW JOHNSON, Nashville, Tenn.: If it’s not too much trouble, please come right away and have a personal chat with me.
TO VICE-PRESIDENT HAMLIN.
AN ACT TO REGULATE THE DUTIES OF THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN PREPARING FOR THE ORGANIZATION OF THE HOUSE.
AN ACT TO REGULATE THE DUTIES OF THE CLERK OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IN PREPARING FOR THE ORGANIZATION OF THE HOUSE.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that, before the first meeting of the next Congress, and of every subsequent Congress, the clerk of the next preceding House of Representatives shall make a roll of the Representatives elect, and place thereon the names of all persons, and of such persons only, whose credentials show that they were regularly elected in accordance with the laws of their States respectively, or the laws of the United States.
Let it be known by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that before the first meeting of the next Congress, and every Congress after that, the clerk of the previous House of Representatives will create a list of the elected Representatives and include only the names of those whose credentials prove they were properly elected according to the laws of their respective States or the laws of the United States.
Approved March 3, 1863.
Approved March 3, 1863.
TO J. W. GRIMES.
EXECUTIVE MANSION,
WASHINGTON, D.C., October 29, 1863.
WASHINGTON, D.C., October 29, 1863.
HON. JAMES W. GRIMES.
Hon. James W. Grimes.
MY DEAR SIR:—The above act of Congress was passed, as I suppose, for the purpose of shutting out improper applicants for seats in the House of Representatives; and I fear there is some danger that it will be used to shut out proper ones. Iowa, having an entire Union delegation, will be one of the States the attempt will be made, if upon any. The Governor doubtless has made out the certificates, and they are already in the hands of the members. I suggest that they come on with them; but that, for greater caution, you, and perhaps Mr. Harlan with you, consult with the Governor, and have an additional set made out according to the form on the other half of this sheet; and still another set, if you can, by studying the law, think of a form that in your judgment, promises additional security, and quietly bring the whole on with you, to be used in case of necessity. Let what you do be kept still.
MY DEAR SIR:—The act of Congress mentioned above was passed, I assume, to prevent unsuitable candidates from getting seats in the House of Representatives; however, I worry that it might also exclude qualified ones. Iowa, having a complete Union delegation, may be one of the states targeted for this, if any are. The Governor likely has prepared the certificates, and they are already with the members. I suggest they come with them; but to be cautious, you, and maybe Mr. Harlan as well, should consult with the Governor and have a second set prepared according to the form on the other half of this sheet; and if possible, come up with another set by considering the law, which you think would provide extra security, and bring all of them with you, in case they are needed. Please keep what you do private.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO P. F. LOWE.
[Cipher.]
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., October 30, 1863.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D.C., October 30, 1863.
HON. F. F. LOWE, San Francisco, Cal.:
HON. F. F. LOWE, San Francisco, CA:
Below is an act of Congress, passed last session, intended to exclude applicants not entitled to seats, but which, there is reason to fear, will be used to exclude some who are entitled. Please get with the Governor and one or two other discreet friends, study the act carefully, and make certificates in two or three forms, according to your best judgement, and have them sent to me, so as to multiply the chances of the delegation getting their seats. Let it be done without publicity. Below is a form which may answer for one. If you could procure the same to be done for the Oregon member it might be well.
Below is a law from Congress, passed last session, meant to keep out applicants who aren't supposed to have seats, but there’s a real concern that it will also keep out some who should. Please speak with the Governor and a couple of trusted friends, examine the law carefully, and prepare certificates in two or three different formats based on your best judgment, then send them to me to increase the chances of the delegation securing their seats. This should be done discreetly. Below is a format that might work for one. If you could arrange for a similar process for the Oregon member, that would be good.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., October 30, 1863.
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of Potomac:
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of the Potomac:
Much obliged for the information about deserters contained in your dispatch of yesterday, while I have to beg your pardon for troubling you in regard to some of them, when, as it appears by yours, I had the means of answering my own questions.
Thank you for the information about deserters in your message from yesterday. I apologize for bothering you about some of them when, as your message indicates, I could have answered my own questions.
MEMORANDUM.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, October 31, 1863.
The Provost-Marshal-General has issued no proclamation at all. He has in no form announced anything recently in regard to troops in New York, except in his letter to Governor Seymour of October 21, which has been published in the newspapers of that State. It has not been announced or decided in any form by the Provost-Marshal-General, or any one else in authority of the Government, that every citizen who has paid his three hundred dollars commutation is liable to be immediately drafted again, or that towns that have just raised the money to pay their quotas will have again to be subject to similar taxation or suffer the operations of the new conscription, nor it is probable that the like of them ever will be announced or decided.
The Provost-Marshal-General hasn't issued any statements at all. He hasn't announced anything recently about troops in New York, except for his letter to Governor Seymour on October 21, which has been published in the state's newspapers. It hasn't been announced or determined by the Provost-Marshal-General or anyone else in the government that every citizen who has paid the three hundred dollars commutation is at risk of being drafted again, or that towns that have just raised money to meet their quotas will have to face similar taxes again or deal with the new conscription. It's unlikely that these issues will ever be addressed or decided.
TELEGRAM TO W. H. SEWARD.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., November 1, 1863.
HON. W. H. SEWARD, Auburn, N.Y.:
HON. W. H. SEWARD, Auburn, N.Y.:
No important news. Details of Hooker's night fight do great credit to his command, and particularly to the Eleventh Corps and Geary's part of the Twelfth. No discredit on any.
No important news. The details of Hooker's night fight really highlight his leadership, especially the Eleventh Corps and Geary's part of the Twelfth. There's no blame on anyone.
TO POSTMASTER-GENERAL BLAIR.
EXECUTIVE MANSION,
WASHINGTON, November 2, 1863.
WASHINGTON, Nov 2, 1863.
HON. MONTGOMERY BLAIR.
Hon. Montgomery Blair.
MY DEAR SIR:—Some days ago I understood you to say that your brother, General Frank Blair, desires to be guided by my wishes as to whether he will occupy his seat in Congress or remain in the field. My wish, then, is compounded of what I believe will be best for the country; and it is that he will come here, put his military commission in my hands, take his seat, go into caucus with our friends, abide the nominations, help elect the nominees, and thus aid to organize a House of Representatives which will really support the Government in the war. If the result shall be the election of himself as Speaker, let him serve in that position. If not, let him retake his commission and return to the army for the benefit of the country.
MY DEAR SIR:—A few days ago, I understood you to say that your brother, General Frank Blair, wants to follow my wishes regarding whether he should take his seat in Congress or stay in the field. My wish, then, is based on what I believe is best for the country; and it is that he should come here, hand over his military commission to me, take his seat, join our friends in caucus, accept the nominations, help elect the nominees, and thus contribute to organizing a House of Representatives that will genuinely support the Government in the war. If the outcome becomes his election as Speaker, let him serve in that role. If not, he should reclaim his commission and go back to the army for the country’s benefit.
This will heal a dangerous schism for him. It will relieve him from a dangerous position or a misunderstanding, as I think he is in danger of being permanently separated from those with whom only he can ever have a real sympathy—the sincere opponents of slavery.
This will fix a serious divide for him. It will help him escape a risky situation or a misunderstanding, as I believe he’s at risk of being permanently cut off from those with whom he can truly connect—the genuine opponents of slavery.
It will be a mistake if he shall allow the provocations offered him by insincere time-servers to drive him from the house of his own building. He is young yet. He has abundant talents—quite enough to occupy all his time without devoting any to temper.
It would be a mistake for him to let the provocations from insincere opportunists push him out of the house he built. He is still young. He has plenty of talent—more than enough to keep him busy without wasting time on anger.
He is rising in military skill and usefulness. His recent appointment to the command of a corps, by one so competent to judge as General Sherman, proves this. In that line he can serve both the country and himself more profitably than he could as a member of Congress upon the floor.
He is improving in military skill and becoming more valuable. His recent appointment to lead a corps by someone as qualified as General Sherman shows this. In that role, he can benefit both the country and himself more effectively than he could as a member of Congress.
The foregoing is what I would say if Frank Blair was my brother instead of yours.
The above is what I would say if Frank Blair were my brother instead of yours.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TO GOVERNOR BRADFORD.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 2, 1863.
His EXCELLENCY A. W. BRADFORD, Governor of Maryland.
His Excellency A. W. Bradford, Governor of Maryland.
SIR:—Yours of the 31st ult. was received yesterday about noon, and since then I have been giving most earnest attention to the subject-matter of it. At my call General Schenck has attended, and he assures me it is almost certain that violence will be used at some of the voting places on election day unless prevented by his provost-guards. He says that at some of those places Union voters will not attend at all, or run a ticket, unless they have some assurance of protection. This makes the Missouri case, of my action in regard to which you express your approval.
SIR:—I received your letter from the 31st of last month around noon yesterday, and since then, I've been focusing intently on the issues raised. General Schenck has come at my request, and he has informed me that it’s highly likely there will be violence at some polling places on election day unless his provost-guards can prevent it. He mentions that in some locations, Union voters won't show up or run a ticket without some guarantee of protection. This highlights the Missouri situation, regarding which you have expressed your support.
The remaining point of your letter is a protest against any person offering to vote being put to any test not found in the laws of Maryland. This brings us to a difference between Missouri and Maryland. With the same reason in both States, Missouri has, by law, provided a test for the voter with reference to the present rebellion, while Maryland has not. For example, General Trimble, captured fighting us at Gettysburg, is, without recanting his treason, a legal voter by the laws of Maryland. Even General Schenck's order admits him to vote, if he recants upon oath. I think that is cheap enough. My order in Missouri, which you approve, and General Scherick's order here, reach precisely the same end. Bach assures the right of voting to all loyal men, and whether a man is loyal, each allows that man to fix by his own oath. Your suggestion that nearly all the candidates are loyal, I do not think quite meets the case. In this struggle for the nation's life, I cannot so confidently rely on those whose elections may have depended upon disloyal votes. Such men, when elected, may prove true; but such votes are given them in the expectation that they will prove false.
The last point of your letter is a complaint against anyone allowed to vote being subjected to any test not mentioned in the laws of Maryland. This brings us to a difference between Missouri and Maryland. For the same reasons in both states, Missouri has legally established a test for voters regarding the current rebellion, while Maryland has not. For instance, General Trimble, who was captured fighting against us at Gettysburg, is legally able to vote under Maryland law without renouncing his treason. Even General Schenck's order allows him to vote if he renounces his actions under oath. I think that’s pretty lenient. My order in Missouri, which you support, and General Scherick's order here, both achieve exactly the same purpose. Both guarantee the right to vote to all loyal individuals, and each allows individuals to determine their own loyalty through their own oath. Your idea that nearly all the candidates are loyal doesn’t fully address the issue. In this fight for the nation’s survival, I can't trust those whose elections may have relied on disloyal votes as confidently. Such individuals, once elected, might turn out to be loyal; however, those votes are cast with the expectation that they will be disloyal.
Nor do I think that to keep the peace at the polls, and to prevent the persistently disloyal from voting, constitutes just cause of offense to Maryland. I think she has her own example for it. If I mistake not, it is precisely what General Dix did when your Excellency was elected Governor.
Nor do I believe that maintaining peace at the polls and preventing those who are consistently disloyal from voting is a valid reason for offense to Maryland. I think she has her own example for this. If I'm not mistaken, it’s exactly what General Dix did when you were elected Governor.
I revoke the first of the three propositions in General Schenek's General Order No. 53; not that it is wrong in principle, but because the military, being of necessity exclusive judges as to who shall be arrested, the provision is too liable to abuse. For the revoked part I substitute the following:
I cancel the first of the three proposals in General Schenek's General Order No. 53; not because it is incorrect in principle, but because the military, by necessity, are the only ones who can decide who should be arrested, making this provision too prone to misuse. For the part I'm canceling, I offer the following:
That, all provost-marshals and other military officers do prevent all disturbance and violence at or about the polls, whether offered by such persons as above described, or by any other person or persons whomsoever.
That all provost-marshals and other military officers must prevent any disturbances and violence at or near the polls, whether caused by the described individuals or by anyone else.
The other two propositions of the order I allow to stand. General Schenek is fully determined, and has my strict orders besides, that all loyal men may vote, and vote for whom they please.
The other two proposals of the order I will keep as is. General Schenek is completely committed and has my explicit instructions that all loyal individuals are allowed to vote and can choose whoever they want.
Your obedient servant,
Sincerely,
TO J. H. HACKETT
[Private.]
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 2, 1863.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 2, 1863.
JAMES H. HACKETT.
JAMES H. HACKETT.
MY DEAR SIR:—Yours of October 22d is received, as also was, in due course, that of October 3d. I look forward with pleasure to the fulfillment of the promise made in the former to visit Washington the following winter and to "call."
MY DEAR SIR:—I received your letter from October 22nd, as well as the one from October 3rd. I eagerly anticipate the promise made in the earlier letter to visit Washington next winter and to "call."
Give yourself no uneasiness on the subject mentioned in that of the 22d. My note to you I certainly did not expect to see in print, yet I have not been much shocked by the newspaper comments upon it.
Don't worry about the topic mentioned on the 22nd. I definitely didn't expect my note to you to be published, but I haven't been too upset by the newspaper's comments on it.
Those comments constitute a fair specimen of what has occurred to me through life. I have endured a great deal of ridicule, without much malice; and have received a great deal of kindness not quite free from ridicule. I am used to it.
Those comments are a good example of what I've experienced throughout my life. I've faced a lot of teasing, but it hasn't been too harsh; and I've also received a lot of kindness, even if it came with a bit of mockery. I'm used to it.
TELEGRAM TO W. H. SEWARD.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON CITY, November 3, 1863.
HON. W. H. SEWARD, Auburn, N. Y.:
HON. W. H. SEWARD, Auburn, NY:
Nothing new. Dispatches up to 12 last night from Chattanooga show all quiet and doing well. How is your son?
Nothing new. Reports up to 12 last night from Chattanooga show everything quiet and going well. How is your son?
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 3, 1863.
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of Potomac:
Samuel Wellers, private in Company B, Forty-ninth Pennsylvania Volunteers, writes that he is to be shot for desertion on the 6th instant. His own story is rather a bad one, and yet he tells it so frankly, that I am somewhat interested in him. Has he been a good soldier except the desertion? About how old is he?
Samuel Wellers, a private in Company B of the Forty-ninth Pennsylvania Volunteers, writes that he is scheduled to be shot for desertion on the 6th of this month. His story is pretty unfortunate, but he shares it so honestly that I find myself somewhat intrigued by him. Has he been a good soldier aside from the desertion? How old is he?
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE.
EXECUTIVE, MANSION WASHINGTON, D. C., November 5, 1863.
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of Potomac:
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of the Potomac:
Please suspend the execution of Samuel Wellers, Forty-ninth Pennsylvania Volunteers, until further orders.
Please hold off on the execution of Samuel Wellers, Forty-ninth Pennsylvania Volunteers, until further notice.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL A. E. BURNSIDE. WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, November
9, 1863.4 P.M.
September 9, 1863, 4 PM.
MAJOR-GENERAL BURNSIDE, Knoxville, Tenn.:
MAJOR-GENERAL BURNSIDE, Knoxville, TN:
Have seen dispatch from General Grant about your loss at Rogersville. Per contra, about the same time, Averell and Duffle got considerable advantage of the enemy at and about Lewisburg, Virginia: and on Saturday, the seventh, Meade drove the enemy from Rappahannock Station and Kelly's Ford, capturing eight battle-flags, four guns, and over 1800 prisoners, with very little loss to himself. Let me hear from you.
I've seen the message from General Grant regarding your loss at Rogersville. On the other hand, around the same time, Averell and Duffle gained a significant advantage over the enemy in and around Lewisburg, Virginia. On Saturday, the seventh, Meade pushed the enemy back from Rappahannock Station and Kelly's Ford, capturing eight battle flags, four guns, and over 1800 prisoners, with very few losses on his side. Let me know how you're doing.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. G. MEADE.
WASHINGTON, November 9, 1863 7.30 P.M.
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE:
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE:
I have seen your dispatches about operations on the Rappahannock on Saturday, and I wish to say, "Well done!" Do the 1500 prisoners reported by General Sedgwick include the 400 taken by General French, or do the Whole amount to 1900?
I’ve read your updates about the operations on the Rappahannock on Saturday, and I want to say, "Great job!" Do the 1,500 prisoners mentioned by General Sedgwick include the 400 captured by General French, or do we have a total of 1,900?
ORDER CONCERNING THE EXPORT OF TOBACCO PURCHASED BY FOREIGN NATIONS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION,
WASHINGTON, November 10, 1863.
WASHINGTON, Nov 10, 1863.
In consideration of the peculiar circumstances and pursuant to the comity deemed to be due to friendly powers, any tobacco in the United States belonging to the government either of France, Austria, or any other state with which this country is at peace, and which tobacco was purchased and paid for by such government prior to the 4th day of March, 1861, may be exported from any port of the United States under the supervision and upon the responsibility of naval officers of such governments and in conformity to such regulations as may be presented by the Secretary of State of the United States, and not otherwise.
Considering the unique circumstances and in light of the respect owed to friendly nations, any tobacco in the United States owned by the government of France, Austria, or any other country that is at peace with the U.S., and that was purchased and paid for by that government before March 4, 1861, may be exported from any U.S. port under the supervision and responsibility of naval officers from those governments, following the regulations established by the Secretary of State of the United States, and no other way.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL SCHOFIELD.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., November 10, 1863.
GENERAL SCHOFIELD, Saint Louis, Mo.:
GENERAL SCHOFIELD, St. Louis, MO:
I see a dispatch here from Saint Louis, which is a little difficult for me to understand. It says "General Schofield has refused leave of absence to members in military service to attend the legislature. All such are radical and administration men. The election of two Senators from this place on Thursday will probably turn upon this thing." what does this mean? Of course members of the legislation must be allowed to attend its sessions. But how is there a session before the recent election returns are in? And how is it to be at "this place"—and that is Saint Louis? Please inform me.
I see a message here from Saint Louis that’s a bit hard for me to grasp. It says, "General Schofield has denied leave of absence to military service members to attend the legislature. All of them are radical and administration supporters. The election of two Senators from here on Thursday will probably depend on this issue." What does this mean? Obviously, members of the legislature should be allowed to attend its sessions. But how can there be a session before the recent election results are in? And how can it be at "this place"—which refers to Saint Louis? Please clarify.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL SCHOFIELD.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., November 11, 1863.
GENERAL SCHOFIELD, Saint Louis, Mo.:
GENERAL SCHOFIELD, St. Louis, MO:
I believe the Secretary of War has telegraphed you about members of the legislation. At all events, allow those in the service to attend the session, and we can afterward decide whether they can stay through the entire session.
I think the Secretary of War has messaged you about the members of the legislation. In any case, let those in the service attend the session, and we can decide later if they can stay for the whole session.
TELEGRAM TO HIRAM BARNEY.
[Cipher.]
[Cipher.]
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., November 11, 1863.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D.C., November 11, 1863.
HON. HIRAM BARNEY, New York; I would like an interview with you. Can you not come?
HON. HIRAM BARNEY, New York; I would like to have a meeting with you. Can you not make it?
TELEGRAM TO J. MILDERBORGER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION,
WASHINGTON, D. C., November 11, 1863.
WASHINGTON, D. C., November 11, 1863.
JOHN MILDERBORGER, Peru, Ind.:
JOHN MILDERBORGER, Peru, IN:
I cannot comprehend the object of your dispatch. I do not often decline seeing people who call upon me, and probably will see you if you call.
I can't understand the purpose of your message. I don't usually turn down visits from people who come to see me, so I'll likely meet with you if you stop by.
TELEGRAM to E. H. AND E. JAMESON.
WAR DEPARTMENT,
WASHINGTON, D. C., November 13, 1863.
WASHINGTON, D.C., November 13, 1863.
E. H. and E. JAMESON, Jefferson City, Mo.:
E. H. and E. JAMESON, Jefferson City, MO:
Yours saying Brown and Henderson are elected Senators is received. I understand this is one and one. If so it is knocking heads together to some.
Your message saying that Brown and Henderson have been elected Senators has been received. I understand this is one to one. If that's the case, it's causing some conflict.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. ROSECRANS.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, November 14, 1863. 12.15 P.M.
MAJOR-GENERAL ROSECRANS, Cincinnati, Ohio:
MAJOR-GENERAL ROSECRANS, Cincinnati, OH:
I have received and considered your dispatch of yesterday. Of the reports you mention, I have not the means of seeing any except your own. Besides this, the publication might be improper in view of the court of inquiry which has been ordered. With every disposition, not merely to do justice, but to oblige you, I feel constrained to say I think the publications better not be made now.
I got your message from yesterday and have thought about it. I can only see your report, not any of the others you mentioned. Also, sharing it might not be appropriate since there's a court of inquiry set up. I really want to do what's fair and help you out, but I feel I have to say that it's better not to publish anything right now.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BURNSIDE.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON CITY, November 16, 1863.
MAJOR-GENERAL BURNSIDE, Knoxville, Tenn.:
MAJOR-GENERAL BURNSIDE, Knoxville, TN:
What is the news?
What's the news?
TO SECRETARY CHASE
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 17, 1863.
HON. SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY.
Secretary of the Treasury.
MY DEAR SIR:—I expected to see you here at Cabinet meeting, and to say something about going to Gettysburg. There will be a train to take and return us. The time for starting is not yet fixed, but when it shall be I will notify you.
MY DEAR SIR:—I was expecting you at the Cabinet meeting to discuss going to Gettysburg. There will be a train to take us there and back. The departure time hasn’t been set yet, but I will let you know as soon as it is.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
ADDRESS AT GETTYSBURG
NOVEMBER 19, 1863.
Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.
Eighty-seven years ago, our forefathers established a new nation on this continent, based on the principles of freedom and committed to the idea that all people are created equal.
Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.
Now we are caught up in a major civil war, testing whether this nation or any nation built on those principles can last. We have gathered on a significant battlefield of that war. We have come to dedicate a part of that field as a final resting place for those who gave their lives here so that this nation might survive. It’s completely appropriate that we do this.
But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate—we can not consecrate—we can not hallow—this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us—that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
But, in a broader sense, we can’t dedicate—we can’t consecrate—we can’t hallow—this ground. The brave men, both living and dead, who fought here have already made it sacred, far beyond our limited ability to add or take away from it. The world will barely pay attention to what we say here, nor will it remember it for long, but it can never forget what they did here. It is up to us, the living, to dedicate ourselves to the unfinished work that they who fought here have so nobly advanced so far. It is our responsibility to be here dedicated to the great task still ahead of us—that, from these honored dead, we take up increased commitment to the cause for which they gave their all. We resolve that these heroes shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall experience a new birth of freedom—and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not disappear from the earth.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., November 20, 1863.
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of Potomac:
Major General Meade, Army of the Potomac:
If there is a man by the name of King under sentence to be shot, please suspend execution till further order, and send record.
If there’s a man named King who’s scheduled to be shot, please postpone the execution until further notice and send the record.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON. November 20, 1863.
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of Potomac:
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of the Potomac:
An intelligent woman in deep distress, called this morning, saying her husband, a lieutenant in the Army of Potomac, was to be shot next Monday for desertion, and putting a letter in my hand, upon which I relied for particulars, she left without mentioning a name or other particular by which to identify the case. On opening the letter I found it equally vague, having nothing to identify by, except her own signature, which seems to be "Mrs. Anna S. King." I could not again find her. If you have a case which you shall think is probably the one intended, please apply my dispatch of this morning to it.
An intelligent woman in deep distress called this morning, saying her husband, a lieutenant in the Army of the Potomac, was set to be shot next Monday for desertion. She handed me a letter, which I relied on for details, and then left without giving a name or any information to identify the case. When I opened the letter, I found it equally vague, having nothing to identify it except her signature, which appears to be "Mrs. Anna S. King." I couldn't find her again. If you have a case that you think is likely the one she meant, please use the dispatch I sent this morning for it.
TELEGRAM TO E. P. EVANS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., November 23, 1863.
E. P. EVANS, West Union, Adams County, Ohio:
E. P. EVANS, West Union, Adams County, Ohio:
Yours to Governor Chase in behalf of John A Welch is before me. Can there be a worse case than to desert and with letters persuading others to desert? I cannot interpose without a better showing than you make. When did he desert? when did he write the letters?
Yours to Governor Chase on behalf of John A Welch is in front of me. Could there be a worse situation than abandoning one's post and trying to convince others to do the same? I can't step in unless you present a stronger case than what you've provided. When exactly did he desert? When did he write those letters?
TO SECRETARY SEWARD.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., November 23, 1863.
MY DEAR SIR:—Two despatches since I saw you; one not quite so late on firing as we had before, but giving the points that Burnside thinks he can hold the place, that he is not closely invested, and that he forages across the river. The other brings the firing up to 11 A.M. yesterday, being twenty-three hours later than we had before.
MY DEAR SIR:—I've received two messages since I last saw you; one is slightly more recent than the last update on the firing but indicates that Burnside believes he can hold the position, that he isn’t under heavy siege, and that he is gathering supplies across the river. The other update brings the firing up to 11 A.M. yesterday, which is twenty-three hours later than the last information we had.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL GRANT.
WASHINGTON, November 25, 1863. 8.40 A.M.
MAJOR-GENERAL U.S. GRANT:
MAJ. GEN. U.S. GRANT:
Your despatches as to fighting on Monday and Tuesday are here. Well done! Many thanks to all. Remember Burnside.
Your reports about the fighting on Monday and Tuesday are here. Great job! Thanks to everyone. Don't forget Burnside.
TO C. P. KIRKLAND.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 7, 1863.
CHARLES P. KIRKLAND, ESQ., New York:
CHARLES P. KIRKLAND, ESQ., New York:
I have just received and have read your published letter to the HON. Benjamin R. Curtis. Under the circumstances I may not be the most competent judge, but it appears to me to be a paper of great ability, and for the country's sake more than for my own I thank you for it.
I just got and read your published letter to the Honorable Benjamin R. Curtis. I may not be the best judge under the circumstances, but it seems to me to be a highly capable piece of writing, and for the sake of the country more than my own, I thank you for it.
Yours very truly,
Sincerely,
ANNOUNCEMENT OF UNION SUCCESS IN EAST TENNESSEE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., December 7, 1863.
Reliable information being received that the insurgent force is retreating from East Tennessee, under circumstances rendering it probable that the Union forces cannot hereafter be dislodged from that important position; and esteeming this to be of high national consequence, I recommend that all loyal people do, on receipt of this information, assemble at their places of worship, and render special homage and gratitude to Almighty God for this great advancement of the national cause.
Reliable information has come in that the insurgent force is retreating from East Tennessee, making it likely that the Union forces cannot be removed from that important position anymore. Considering this to be of great national importance, I recommend that all loyal individuals, upon receiving this news, gather at their places of worship to offer special thanks and gratitude to Almighty God for this significant progress in the national cause.
PROCLAMATION OF AMNESTY AND RECONSTRUCTION. DECEMBER 8, 1863.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas in and by the Constitution of the United States it is provided that the President "shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment;" and,
Whereas in the Constitution of the United States, it is stated that the President "shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment;" and,
Whereas a rebellion now exists whereby the loyal State governments of several States have for a long time been subverted, and many persons have committed and are now guilty of treason against the United States; and
Where there is now a rebellion in which the loyal state governments of several states have been undermined for a long time, and many individuals have committed and are currently guilty of treason against the United States; and
Whereas, with reference to said rebellion and treason, laws have been enacted by Congress declaring forfeitures and confiscation of property and liberation of slaves, all upon terms and conditions therein stated, and also declaring that the President was thereby authorized at any time thereafter, by proclamation, to extend to persons who may have participated in the existing rebellion in any State or part thereof pardon and amnesty, with such exceptions and at such times and on such conditions as he may deem expedient for the public welfare; and
Whereas, regarding the mentioned rebellion and treason, Congress has passed laws stating the forfeiture and seizure of property, as well as the freedom of slaves, all under specific terms and conditions outlined in those laws. It also states that the President is authorized, at any time afterwards, through a proclamation, to offer pardon and amnesty to individuals who may have taken part in the ongoing rebellion in any State or part of it, with such exceptions, times, and conditions that he believes are necessary for the public good; and
Whereas the Congressional declaration for limited and conditional pardon accords with well-established judicial exposition of the pardoning power; and
Whereas the Congressional declaration for a limited and conditional pardon aligns with the well-established legal understanding of the pardoning power; and
Whereas, with reference to said rebellion, the President of the United States has issued several proclamations with provisions in regard to the liberation of slaves; and
Whereas, regarding that rebellion, the President of the United States has issued several proclamations concerning the emancipation of slaves; and
Whereas it is now desired by some persons heretofore engaged in said rebellion to resume their allegiance to the United States and to reinaugurate loyal State governments within and for their respective States:
Whereas some individuals who were previously involved in that rebellion now wish to recommit themselves to the United States and reestablish loyal State governments in their respective States:
Therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, do proclaim, declare, and make known to all persons who have, directly or by implication, participated in the existing rebellion, except as hereinafter excepted, that a full pardon is hereby granted to them and each of them, with restoration of all rights of property, except as to slaves and in property cases where rights of third parties shall have intervened, and upon the condition that every such person shall take and subscribe an oath and thenceforward keep and maintain said oath inviolate, and which oath shall be registered for permanent preservation and shall be of the tenor and effect following, to wit:
Therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, do proclaim, declare, and make known to everyone who has participated in the current rebellion, either directly or indirectly, except as stated later, that a full pardon is granted to them and each one of them, restoring all property rights, except for slaves and in cases where the rights of third parties are involved, and on the condition that each individual takes and subscribes to an oath and continues to uphold that oath without fail, which will be registered for permanent records and will read as follows:
"I, ———, do solemnly swear, in presence of Almighty God, that I will henceforth faithfully support, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Union of the States thereunder; and that I will in like manner abide by and faithfully support all acts of Congress passed during the existing rebellion with reference to slaves, so long and so far as not repealed, modified, or held void by Congress or by decision of the Supreme Court; and that I will in like manner abide by and faithfully support all proclamations of the President made during the existing rebellion having reference to slaves, so long and so far as not modified or declared void by decision of the Supreme Court. So help me God."
"I, ———, do solemnly swear, in the presence of Almighty God, that I will henceforth faithfully support, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Union of the States established by it; and that I will also abide by and support all acts of Congress passed during the current rebellion relating to slaves, as long as they are not repealed, modified, or declared void by Congress or by a decision of the Supreme Court; and that I will similarly abide by and support all proclamations of the President made during the current rebellion concerning slaves, as long as they are not modified or declared void by a decision of the Supreme Court. So help me God."
The persons excepted from the benefits of the foregoing provisions are all who are or shall have been civil or diplomatic officers or agents of the so-called Confederate Government; all who have left judicial stations under the United States to aid the rebellion; all who are or shall have been military or naval officers of said so-called Confederate Government above the rank of colonel in the army or of lieutenant in the navy; all who left seats in the United States Congress to aid the rebellion; all who resigned commissions in the Army or Navy of the United States and afterwards aided the rebellion; and all who have engaged in any way in treating colored persons, or white persons in charge of such, otherwise than lawfully as prisoners of war, and which persons may have been found in the United States service as soldiers, seamen, or in any other capacity.
The people excluded from the benefits of the above provisions are anyone who is or has been a civil or diplomatic officer or agent of the so-called Confederate Government; anyone who left their judicial positions under the United States to support the rebellion; anyone who is or has been a military or naval officer of the so-called Confederate Government above the rank of colonel in the army or above the rank of lieutenant in the navy; anyone who left their seat in the United States Congress to support the rebellion; anyone who resigned their commissions in the Army or Navy of the United States and then supported the rebellion; and anyone who has been involved in treating colored individuals, or white individuals responsible for them, in any way other than legally as prisoners of war, and who may have been found in the United States service as soldiers, sailors, or in any other role.
And I do further proclaim, declare, and make known that whenever, in any of the States of Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, and North Carolina, a number of persons, not less than one-tenth in number of the votes cast in such State at the Presidential election of the year A.D. 1860, each having taken oath aforesaid, and not having since violated it, and being a qualified voter by the election law of the State existing immediately before the so-called act of secession, and excluding all others, shall reestablish a State government which shall be republican and in nowise contravening said oath, such shall be recognized as the true government of the State, and the State shall receive thereunder the benefits of the constitutional provision which declares that "the United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion, and, on application of the legislature, or the EXECUTIVE (when the legislature can not be convened), against domestic violence."
And I further announce, declare, and make clear that whenever, in any of the States of Arkansas, Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, and North Carolina, a group of people, not less than one-tenth of the votes cast in that State during the Presidential election of 1860, each having taken the aforementioned oath, not having violated it since, and being a qualified voter according to the election law of the State that was in place right before the so-called act of secession, and excluding all others, shall reestablish a State government that is republican and does not go against that oath, such a government will be recognized as the legitimate government of the State, and the State will receive the benefits provided by the constitutional provision which states that "the United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a republican form of government and shall protect each of them against invasion, and, upon the request of the legislature, or the EXECUTIVE (when the legislature cannot be convened), against domestic violence."
And I do further proclaim, declare, and make known that any provision which may be adopted by such State government in relation to the freed people of such State which shall recognize and declare their permanent freedom, provide for their education, and which may yet be consistent as a temporary arrangement with their present condition as a laboring, landless, and homeless class, will not be objected to by the National EXECUTIVE.
And I further announce, state, and make it clear that any rules established by the state government regarding the freed people of that state, which acknowledge and affirm their permanent freedom, support their education, and are still appropriate as a temporary solution for their current situation as a working, landless, and homeless group, will not face any objections from the National EXECUTIVE.
And it is suggested as not improper that in constructing a loyal State government in any State the name of the State, the boundary, the subdivisions, the constitution, and the general code of laws as before the rebellion be maintained, subject only to the modifications made necessary by the conditions hereinbefore stated, and such others, if any, not contravening said co and which may be deemed expedient by those framing the new State government.
And it's recommended that when creating a loyal state government in any state, the name of the state, its boundaries, subdivisions, constitution, and general laws from before the rebellion should be preserved, with changes only made as needed based on the previously mentioned conditions, and any additional changes that don’t conflict with those rules and that might be considered appropriate by those establishing the new state government.
To avoid misunderstanding, it may be proper to say that this proclamation, so far as it relates to State governments, has no reference to States wherein loyal State governments have all the while been maintained. And for the same reason it may be proper to further say that whether members sent to Congress from any State shall be admitted to seats constitutionally rests exclusively with the respective Houses, and not to any extent with the EXECUTIVE. And, still further, that this proclamation is intended to present the people of the States wherein the national authority has been suspended and loyal State governments have been subverted a mode in and by which the national authority and loyal State governments may be re-established within said States or in any of them; and while the mode presented is the best the EXECUTIVE can suggest, with his present impressions, it must not be understood that no other possible mode would be acceptable.
To prevent any misunderstanding, it’s important to clarify that this proclamation, as it pertains to State governments, does not apply to States where loyal State governments have consistently been maintained. Furthermore, it should be noted that the decision on whether members sent to Congress from any State will be admitted to their seats is entirely up to the respective Houses and not the EXECUTIVE. Additionally, this proclamation aims to provide the people of the States where national authority has been suspended and loyal State governments have been disrupted a way to re-establish national authority and loyal State governments in those States. While the method proposed is the best the EXECUTIVE can suggest based on current understandings, it should not be taken to mean that no other possible method would be acceptable.
Given under my hand at the city of WASHINGTON, the 8th day of December, A. D. 1863, and of the Independence of the United States of America the eighty-eighth.
Given under my hand at the city of WASHINGTON, on December 8, 1863, and in the eighty-eighth year of the Independence of the United States of America.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
ANNUAL MESSAGE TO CONGRESS, DECEMBER 8, 1863.
FELLOW-CITIZENS OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:—
Fellow citizens of the Senate and House of Representatives:
Another year of health, and of sufficiently abundant harvests, has passed. For these, and especially for the improved condition cf our national affairs, our renewed and profoundest gratitude to God is due.
Another year of good health and plenty of harvests has passed. For these, and especially for the better state of our national affairs, we owe our renewed and deepest gratitude to God.
We remain in peace and friendship with foreign powers.
We continue to maintain peace and friendship with other nations.
The efforts of disloyal citizens of the United States to involve us in foreign wars, to aid an inexcusable insurrection, have been unavailing. Her Britannic Majesty's government, as was justly expected, have exercised their authority to prevent the departure of new hostile expeditions from British ports. The Emperor of France has, by a like proceeding, promptly vindicated the neutrality which he proclaimed at the beginning of the contest. Questions of great intricacy and importance have arisen out of the blockade, and other belligerent operations, between the Government and several of the maritime powers, but they have been discussed, and, as far as was possible, accommodated, in a spirit of frankness, justice, and mutual good-will. It is especially gratifying that our prize courts, by the impartiality of their adjudications, have commanded the respect and confidence of maritime powers.
The attempts by disloyal citizens of the United States to get us involved in foreign wars and support an unjust rebellion have failed. The British government, as expected, has taken steps to stop new hostile missions from leaving British ports. The French Emperor has also quickly upheld the neutrality he declared at the start of the conflict. Complicated and significant issues have arisen from the blockade and other military actions between the government and several maritime nations, but they have been discussed and, as far as possible, resolved with honesty, fairness, and mutual respect. It's particularly encouraging that our prize courts, through their fair rulings, have earned the respect and trust of maritime nations.
The supplemental treaty between the United States and Great Britain for the suppression of the African slave-trade, made on the 17th day of February last, has been duly ratified and carried into execution. It is believed that, so far as American ports and American citizens are concerned, that inhuman and odious traffic has been brought to an end.
The additional treaty between the United States and Great Britain aimed at ending the African slave trade, signed on February 17th, has been officially approved and put into action. It is believed that, as far as American ports and American citizens are involved, that cruel and shameful trade has been stopped.
I shall submit, for the consideration of the Senate, a convention for the adjustment of possessory claims in Washington Territory, arising out of the treaty of the 15th of June, 1846, between the United States and Great Britain, and which have been the source of some disquiet among the citizens of that now rapidly improving part of the country.
I will present to the Senate a proposal for addressing possession claims in Washington Territory that come from the treaty of June 15, 1846, between the United States and Great Britain, which have caused some concern among the residents of that fast-developing region.
A novel and important question, involving the extent of the maritime jurisdiction of Spain in the waters which surround the island of Cuba, has been debated without reaching an agreement, and it is proposed, in an amicable spirit, to refer it to the arbitrament of a friendly power. A convention for that purpose will be submitted to the Senate.
A new and significant question about how much maritime control Spain has over the waters around Cuba has been discussed without reaching a consensus, and it is suggested, in a friendly manner, to refer the issue to the judgment of a neutral country. A proposal for this will be presented to the Senate.
I have thought it proper, subject to the approval of the Senate, to concur with the interested commercial powers in an arrangement for the liquidation of the Scheldt dues upon the principles which have been heretofore adopted in regard to the imposts upon navigation in the waters of Denmark.
I believe it's appropriate, pending the Senate's approval, to agree with the involved commercial nations on a plan to resolve the Scheldt dues based on the principles that have previously been established regarding taxes on navigation in Denmark's waters.
The long-pending controversy between this government and that of Chile touching the seizure at Sitana, in Peru, by Chilean officers, of a large amount in treasure belonging to citizens of the United States has been brought to a close by the award of His Majesty the King of the Belgians, to whose arbitration the question was referred by the parties. The subject was thoroughly and patiently examined by that justly respected magistrate, and although the sum awarded to the claimants may not have been as large as they expected there is no reason to distrust the wisdom of His Majesty's decision. That decision was promptly complied with by Chile when intelligence in regard to it reached that country.
The long-standing dispute between this government and Chile regarding the seizure at Sitana, in Peru, by Chilean officials of a significant amount of treasure belonging to U.S. citizens has been resolved by the ruling of His Majesty the King of the Belgians, to whom the parties referred the matter for arbitration. The issue was carefully and thoroughly examined by that highly respected magistrate, and although the amount awarded to the claimants may not have been as high as they anticipated, there is no reason to doubt the soundness of His Majesty's decision. Chile promptly complied with that decision once they received word about it.
The joint commission under the act of the last session of carrying into effect the convention with Peru on the subject of claims has been organized at Lima, and is engaged in the business intrusted to it.
The joint commission established under the act from the last session to implement the convention with Peru regarding claims has been set up in Lima and is currently carrying out its assigned tasks.
Difficulties concerning interoceanic transit through Nicaragua are in course of amicable adjustment.
Issues related to interoceanic transit through Nicaragua are being resolved amicably.
In conformity with principles set forth in my last annual message, I have received a representative from the United States of Colombia, and have accredited a minister to that Republic.
In line with the principles outlined in my last annual message, I have received a representative from the United States of Colombia and have appointed a minister to that Republic.
Incidents occurring in the progress of our civil war have forced upon my attention the uncertain state of international questions touching the rights of foreigners in this country and of United States citizens abroad. In regard to some governments these rights are at least partially defined by treaties. In no instance, however, is it expressly stipulated that in the event of civil war a foreigner residing in this country within the lines of the insurgents is to be exempted from the rule which classes him as a belligerent, in whose behalf the government of his country can not expect any privileges or immunities distinct from that character. I regret to say, however, that such claims have been put forward, and in some instances in behalf of foreigners who have lived in the United States the greater part of their lives.
Incidents happening during our civil war have made me aware of the unclear situation regarding international issues related to the rights of foreigners in this country and U.S. citizens living abroad. For some governments, these rights are at least partly outlined in treaties. However, there's no specific agreement stating that in the case of civil war, a foreigner living in this country within the lines of the insurgents is exempt from being classified as a belligerent, meaning that the government of their home country can't expect any privileges or protections that are different from that status. Unfortunately, I must say that such claims have been made, even for foreigners who have spent most of their lives in the United States.
There is reason to believe that many persons born in foreign countries who have declared their intention to become citizens, or who have been fully naturalized have evaded the military duty required of them by denying the fact and thereby throwing upon the Government the burden of proof. It has been found difficult or impracticable to obtain this proof from the want of guides to the proper sources of information. These might be supplied by requiring clerks of courts where declarations of intention may be made or naturalizations effected to send periodically lists of the names of the persons naturalized or declaring their intention to become citizens to the Secretary of the Interior, in whose Department those names might be arranged and printed for general information.
There is reason to believe that many people born in foreign countries who have expressed their intention to become citizens, or who have been fully naturalized, have avoided their military obligations by denying the fact, shifting the burden of proof onto the government. It has been challenging or impossible to obtain this proof due to a lack of guidance on where to find the necessary information. This could be addressed by requiring court clerks, where declarations of intention can be made or naturalizations completed, to periodically send lists of the names of those naturalized or declaring their intention to become citizens to the Secretary of the Interior. In this department, those names could be organized and printed for public information.
There is also reason to believe that foreigners frequently become citizens of the United States for the sole purpose of evading duties imposed by the laws of their native countries, to which on becoming naturalized here they at once repair, and though never returning to the United States they still claim the interposition of this government as citizens. Many altercations and great prejudices have heretofore arisen out of this abuse. It is therefore submitted to your serious consideration. It might be advisable to fix a limit beyond which no citizen of the United States residing abroad may claim the interposition of his government.
There’s also reason to believe that foreigners often become citizens of the United States just to avoid the responsibilities imposed by the laws of their home countries, to which they immediately return after becoming naturalized here. Even though they never come back to the United States, they still claim the support of this government as citizens. This abuse has led to many disputes and significant biases in the past. Therefore, I urge you to consider this seriously. It might be wise to establish a limit beyond which no U.S. citizen living abroad can seek the support of their government.
The right of suffrage has often been assumed and exercised by aliens under pretenses of naturalization, which they have disavowed when drafted into the military service. I submit the expediency of such an amendment of the law as will make the fact of voting an estoppe against any plea of exemption from military service or other civil obligation on the ground of alienage.
The right to vote has often been taken and used by non-citizens pretending to be naturalized, which they have denied when called up for military service. I propose that we amend the law so that if someone votes, they can’t claim exemption from military service or other civic responsibilities based on being an alien.
In common with other Western powers, our relations with Japan have been brought into serious jeopardy through the perverse opposition of the hereditary aristocracy of the Empire to the enlightened and liberal policy of the Tycoon, designed to bring the country into the society of nations. It is hoped, although not with entire confidence, that these difficulties may be peacefully overcome. I ask your attention to the claim of the minister residing there for the damages he sustained in the destruction by fire of the residence of the legation at Yedo.
Like other Western powers, our relationship with Japan has been put at serious risk due to the stubborn resistance of the hereditary aristocracy to the progressive and liberal policies of the Tycoon, which aim to integrate the country into the global community. We hope, albeit not entirely confidently, that these issues can be resolved peacefully. I would like to draw your attention to the claim from the minister stationed there for the damages he incurred from the fire that destroyed the legation’s residence in Yedo.
Satisfactory arrangements have been made with the Emperor of Russia, which, it is believed, will result in effecting a continuous line of telegraph through that Empire from our Pacific coast.
Satisfactory agreements have been reached with the Emperor of Russia, which is expected to result in a continuous telegraph line through that Empire from our Pacific coast.
I recommend to your favorable consideration the subject of an international telegraph across the Atlantic Ocean, and also of a telegraph between this capital and the national forts along the Atlantic seaboard and the Gulf of Mexico. Such communications, established with any reasonable outlay, would be economical as well as effective aids to the diplomatic, military, and naval service.
I urge you to consider the idea of an international telegraph across the Atlantic Ocean, as well as a telegraph connection between this capital and the national forts along the Atlantic coast and the Gulf of Mexico. Setting up such communications, with a reasonable investment, would be both cost-effective and beneficial for our diplomatic, military, and naval operations.
The consular system of the United States, under the enactments of the last Congress, begins to be self-sustaining, and there is reason to hope that it may become entirely so with the increase of trade which will ensue whenever peace is restored. Our ministers abroad have been faithful in defending American rights. In protecting commercial interests our consuls have necessarily had to encounter increased labors and responsibilities growing out of the war. These they have for the most part met and discharged with zeal and efficiency. This acknowledgment justly includes those consuls who, residing in Morocco, Egypt, Turkey, Japan, China, and other Oriental countries, are charged with complex functions and extraordinary powers.
The consular system of the United States, following the laws passed by the last Congress, is becoming self-sufficient, and there’s hope that it will be completely self-sustaining with the increase in trade that will come once peace is restored. Our diplomats abroad have been diligent in defending American rights. In safeguarding commercial interests, our consuls have had to take on more work and responsibilities due to the war. For the most part, they have tackled these challenges with enthusiasm and effectiveness. This recognition rightly extends to those consuls located in Morocco, Egypt, Turkey, Japan, China, and other Eastern countries, who are tasked with complex duties and significant powers.
The condition of the several organized Territories is generally satisfactory, although Indian disturbances in New Mexico have not been entirely suppressed. The mineral resources of Colorado, Nevada, Idaho, New Mexico, and Arizona are proving far richer than has been heretofore understood. I lay before you a communication on this subject from the Governor of New Mexico. I again submit to your consideration the expediency of establishing a system for the encouragement of immigration. Although this source of national wealth and strength is again flowing with greater freedom than for several years before the insurrection occurred, there is still a great deficiency of laborers in every field of industry, especially in agriculture and in our mines, as well of iron and coal as of the precious metals. While the demand for labor is much increased here, tens of thousands of persons, destitute of remunerative occupation, are thronging our foreign consulates and offering to emigrate to the United States if essential, but very cheap, assistance can be afforded them. It is easy to see that under the sharp discipline of civil war the nation is beginning a new life. This noble effort demands the aid and ought to receive the attention and support of the Government.
The state of the various organized Territories is generally good, although there are still some Indian conflicts in New Mexico that haven't been fully resolved. The mineral resources in Colorado, Nevada, Idaho, New Mexico, and Arizona are turning out to be much richer than previously thought. I'm presenting a message on this topic from the Governor of New Mexico. I want to bring up again the idea of setting up a system to encourage immigration. While this source of national wealth and strength is flowing more freely now than it has in years since the uprising, there is still a significant shortage of workers in every industry, especially in agriculture and in our mines, including iron, coal, and precious metals. Even though the demand for labor is much higher here, tens of thousands of people, without profitable work, are crowding our foreign consulates, eager to emigrate to the United States if they can get some essential but very affordable help. It's clear to see that after the harsh realities of civil war, the nation is starting a new chapter. This important effort needs and deserves the attention and support of the Government.
Injuries unforeseen by the Government and unintended may in some cases have been inflicted on the subjects or citizens of foreign countries, both at sea and on land, by persons in the service of the United States. As this government expects redress from other powers when similar injuries are inflicted by persons in their service upon citizens of the United States, we must be prepared to do justice to foreigners. If the existing judicial tribunals are inadequate to this purpose, a special court may be authorized, with power to hear and decide such claims of the character referred to as may have arisen under treaties and the public law. Conventions for adjusting the claims by joint commission have been proposed to some governments, but no definitive answer to the proposition has yet been received from any.
Unexpected injuries, not intended by the Government, may in some cases have been caused to the subjects or citizens of foreign countries, both at sea and on land, by individuals serving the United States. Just as this government expects compensation from other nations when similar injuries are caused by individuals in their service to citizens of the United States, we must be ready to provide justice to foreigners. If the current judicial systems are not sufficient for this purpose, a special court may be created, with the authority to hear and decide on claims related to treaties and public law. Proposals for settling claims through a joint commission have been made to some governments, but no definitive responses to the proposal have been received from any of them yet.
In the course of the session I shall probably have occasion to request you to provide indemnification to claimants where decrees of restitution have been rendered and damages awarded by admiralty courts, and in other cases where this government may be acknowledged to be liable in principle and where the amount of that liability has been ascertained by an informal arbitration.
During the session, I will likely need to ask you to provide compensation to claimants when restitution orders have been issued and damages have been awarded by admiralty courts, as well as in other situations where this government may be recognized as responsible in principle and where the amount of that responsibility has been determined through informal arbitration.
The proper officers of the Treasury have deemed themselves required by the law of the United States upon the subject to demand a tax upon the incomes of foreign consuls in this country. While such a demand may not in strictness be in derogation of public law, or perhaps of any existing treaty between the United States and a foreign country, the expediency of so far modifying the act as to exempt from tax the income of such consuls as are not citizens of the United States, derived from the emoluments of their office or from property not situated in the United States, is submitted to your serious consideration. I make this suggestion upon the ground that a comity which ought to be reciprocated exempts our consuls in all other countries from taxation to the extent thus indicated. The United States, I think, ought not to be exceptionally illiberal to international trade and commerce.
The appropriate Treasury officials believe they are required by U.S. law to impose a tax on the incomes of foreign consuls in this country. While this demand may not strictly violate public law or any current treaty between the United States and another country, it’s suggested that we modify the law to exempt consuls who are not U.S. citizens from being taxed on income earned from their official duties or from property located outside of the United States. I make this suggestion because the principle of reciprocity means that our consuls are exempt from such taxes in other countries. I believe the United States should not be unusually unwelcoming to international trade and commerce.
The operations of the Treasury during the last year have been successfully conducted. The enactment by Congress of a national banking law has proved a valuable support of the public credit, and the general legislation in relation to loans has fully answered the expectations of its favorers. Some amendments may be required to perfect existing laws, but no change in their principles or general scope is believed to be needed.
The Treasury's activities over the past year have been carried out successfully. The national banking law passed by Congress has been a great support for public credit, and the overall legislation regarding loans has met the expectations of its supporters. Some adjustments might be needed to improve the current laws, but no changes to their core principles or overall purpose are thought to be necessary.
Since these measures have been in operation all demands on the Treasury, including the pay of the Army and Navy, have been promptly met and fully satisfied. No considerable body of troops, it is believed, were ever more amply provided and more liberally and punctually paid, and it may be added that by no people were the burdens incident to a great war ever more cheerfully borne.
Since these measures have been in effect, all requests from the Treasury, including payments for the Army and Navy, have been quickly handled and fully satisfied. It is believed that no significant group of troops has ever been better supported or paid more generously and on time, and it's worth mentioning that no population has ever accepted the burdens of a major war with such a positive attitude.
The receipts during the year from all sources, including loans and balance in the Treasury at its commencement, were $901,125,674.86, and the aggregate disbursements $895,796,630.65, leaving a balance on the 1st of July, 1863, of $5,329,044.21. Of the receipts there were derived from customs $69,059,642.40, from internal revenue $37,640,787.95, from direct tax $1,485,103.61, from lands $167,617.17, from miscellaneous sources $3,046,615.35, and from loans $776,682,361.57, making the aggregate $901,125,674.86. Of the disbursements there were for the civil service $23,253,922.08, for pensions and Indians $4,216,520.79, for interest on public debt $24,729,846.51, for the War Department $599,298,600.83, for the Navy Department $63,211,105.27, for payment of funded and temporary debt $181,086,635.07, making the aggregate $895,796,630.65 and leaving the balance of $5,329,044.21. But the payment of funded and temporary debt, having been made from moneys borrowed during the year, must be regarded as merely nominal payments and the moneys borrowed to make them as merely nominal receipts, and their amount, $181,086,635.07, should therefore be deducted both from receipts and disbursements. This being done there remains as actual receipts $720,039,039.79 and the actual disbursements $714,709,995.58, leaving the balance as already stated.
The total receipts for the year from all sources, including loans and the Treasury balance at the start, were $901,125,674.86, and the total disbursements were $895,796,630.65, resulting in a balance of $5,329,044.21 as of July 1, 1863. The receipts included $69,059,642.40 from customs, $37,640,787.95 from internal revenue, $1,485,103.61 from direct tax, $167,617.17 from land sales, $3,046,615.35 from miscellaneous sources, and $776,682,361.57 from loans, totaling $901,125,674.86. The disbursements included $23,253,922.08 for civil service, $4,216,520.79 for pensions and Native Americans, $24,729,846.51 for interest on public debt, $599,298,600.83 for the War Department, $63,211,105.27 for the Navy Department, and $181,086,635.07 for payment of funded and temporary debt, totaling $895,796,630.65, and leaving a balance of $5,329,044.21. However, since the payment of funded and temporary debt was made with money borrowed during the year, it should be considered merely nominal payments, and the borrowed money, which totaled $181,086,635.07, should be deducted from both receipts and disbursements. After this adjustment, the actual receipts are $720,039,039.79 and the actual disbursements are $714,709,995.58, leaving the previously stated balance.
The actual receipts and disbursements for the first quarter and the estimated receipts and disbursements for the remaining three-quarters of the current fiscal year (1864) will be shown in detail by the report of the Secretary of the Treasury, to which I invite your attention. It is sufficient to say here that it is not believed that actual results will exhibit a state of the finances less favorable to the country than the estimates of that officer heretofore submitted while it is confidently expected that at the close of the year both disbursements and debt will be found very considerably less than has been anticipated.
The actual income and expenses for the first quarter, along with the estimated income and expenses for the next three quarters of the current fiscal year (1864), will be detailed in the report from the Secretary of the Treasury, which I encourage you to review. It's enough to say that we don't expect the actual results to show a financial state worse than the estimates previously provided by that officer. We confidently anticipate that by the end of the year, both expenses and debt will be significantly lower than expected.
The report of the Secretary of War is a document of great interest. It consists of:
The Secretary of War's report is a document of great interest. It consists of:
1. The military operations of the year, detailed in the report of the General in Chief.
1. The military operations of the year, outlined in the report from the Chief General.
2. The organization of colored persons into the war service.
2. The organization of people of color into the military service.
3. The exchange of prisoners, fully set forth in the letter of General Hitchcock.
3. The exchange of prisoners, detailed in General Hitchcock's letter.
4. The operations under the act for enrolling and calling out the national forces, detailed in the report of the Provost Marshal General.
4. The processes outlined in the act for enrolling and activating the national forces, as detailed in the report of the Provost Marshal General.
5. The organization of the invalid corps, and
5. The setup of the invalid corps, and
6. The operation of the several departments of the Quartermaster-General, Commissary-General, Paymaster-General, Chief of Engineers, Chief of Ordnance, and Surgeon-General.
6. The functioning of the different departments of the Quartermaster-General, Commissary-General, Paymaster-General, Chief of Engineers, Chief of Ordnance, and Surgeon-General.
It has appeared impossible to make a valuable summary of this report, except such as would be too extended for this place, and hence I content myself by asking your careful attention to the report itself.
It seems impossible to create a useful summary of this report that wouldn’t be too lengthy for this space, so I’ll just ask you to pay close attention to the report itself.
The duties devolving on the naval branch of the service during the year and throughout the whole of this unhappy contest have been discharged with fidelity and eminent success. The extensive blockade has been constantly increasing in efficiency as the Navy has expanded, yet on so long a line it has so far been impossible to entirely suppress illicit trade. From returns received at the Navy Department it appears that more than 1,000 vessels have been captured since the blockade was instituted? and that the value of prizes already sent in for adjudication amounts to over $13,000,000.
The responsibilities of the naval branch during the past year and throughout this unfortunate conflict have been carried out with dedication and remarkable success. The extensive blockade has continuously improved in effectiveness as the Navy has grown, yet along such a long stretch, it has still been impossible to completely eliminate illegal trade. According to reports received by the Navy Department, it appears that over 1,000 vessels have been captured since the blockade was established, and the value of the prizes already submitted for review totals over $13,000,000.
The naval force of the United States consists at this time of five hundred and eighty-eight vessels completed and in the course of completion, and of these seventy-five are ironclad or armored steamers. The events of the war give an increased interest and importance to the Navy which will probably extend beyond the war itself.
The United States Navy currently has five hundred eighty-eight ships that are either completed or being built, with seventy-five of them being ironclad or armored steamers. The events of the war have raised the Navy's significance and interest, which is likely to continue even after the war ends.
The armored vessels in our Navy completed and in service, or which are under contract and approaching completion, are believed to exceed in number those of any other power; but while these may be relied upon for harbor defense and coast service, others of greater strength and capacity will be necessary for cruising purposes and to maintain our rightful position on the ocean.
The armored ships in our Navy that are either completed and in service or currently under contract and nearing completion are thought to outnumber those of any other country. However, while these ships can be counted on for harbor defense and coastal operations, we will need others that are stronger and have more capacity for cruising and to uphold our rightful position in the ocean.
The change that has taken place in naval vessels and naval warfare since the introduction of steam as a motive power for ships of war demands either a corresponding change in some of our existing navy yards or the establishment of new ones for the construction and necessary repair of modern naval vessels. No inconsiderable embarrassment, delay, and public injury have been experienced from the want of such governmental establishments. The necessity of such a navy-yard, so furnished, at some suitable place upon the Atlantic seaboard has on repeated occasions been brought to the attention of Congress by the Navy Department, and is again presented in the report of the Secretary which accompanies this communication. I think it my duty to invite your special attention to this subject, and also to that of establishing a yard and depot for naval purposes upon one of the Western rivers. A naval force has been created on those interior waters, and under many disadvantages, within little more than two years, exceeding in numbers the whole naval force of the country at the commencement of the present Administration. Satisfactory and important as have been the performances of the heroic men of the Navy at this interesting period, they are scarcely more wonderful than the success of our mechanics and artisans in the production of war vessels, which has created a new form of naval power.
The changes in naval ships and naval warfare since steam engines became the main power source for warships require either updates to our current navy yards or the creation of new ones for building and maintaining modern naval vessels. We've faced significant challenges, delays, and public harm due to the lack of these government facilities. The need for a suitably equipped navy yard along the Atlantic coast has been repeatedly highlighted to Congress by the Navy Department and is once again mentioned in the report from the Secretary included with this communication. I feel it's important to draw your attention to this matter, as well as the need for a yard and depot for naval purposes on one of the Western rivers. A naval force has been established on those inland waterways, and despite facing many challenges, it has grown in just over two years to surpass the total naval force of the country when the current Administration began. While the contributions of the brave men in the Navy during this notable time have been impressive, they are nearly matched by the achievements of our mechanics and craftsmen in producing war vessels, which has led to a new kind of naval power.
Our country has advantages superior to any other nation in our resources of iron and timber, with inexhaustible quantities of fuel in the immediate vicinity of both, and all available and in close proximity to navigable waters. Without the advantage of public works, the resources of the nation have been developed and its power displayed in the construction of a Navy of such magnitude, which has at the very period of its creation rendered signal service to the Union.
Our country has advantages that are better than any other nation when it comes to our resources of iron and timber, with endless amounts of fuel nearby and all of these resources close to navigable waters. Despite lacking public works, the nation has developed its resources and showcased its power by building a Navy of such size that has provided significant service to the Union right from the start.
The increase of the number of seamen in the public service from 7,500 men in the spring of 1861 to about 34,000 at the present time has been accomplished without special legislation or extraordinary bounties to promote that increase. It has been found, however, that the operation of the draft, with the high bounties paid for army recruits, is beginning to affect injuriously the naval service, and will, if not corrected, be likely to impair its efficiency by detaching seamen from their proper vocation and inducing them to enter the Army. I therefore respectfully suggest that Congress might aid both the army and naval services by a definite provision on this subject which would at the same time be equitable to the communities more especially interested.
The number of sailors in the public service has grown from 7,500 in the spring of 1861 to about 34,000 now, without any special laws or extra bonuses to encourage this increase. However, it has been observed that the draft and the high bonuses for army recruits are starting to negatively impact the naval service. If this isn't addressed, it could hurt its effectiveness by pulling sailors away from their jobs and leading them to join the Army instead. I therefore respectfully suggest that Congress could support both the Army and Navy by putting in place a clear policy on this issue that would also be fair to the communities that are particularly affected.
I commend to your consideration the suggestions of the Secretary of the Navy in regard to the policy of fostering and training seamen and also the education of officers and engineers for the naval service. The Naval Academy is rendering signal service in preparing midshipmen for the highly responsible duties which in after life they will be required to perform. In order that the country should not be deprived of the proper quota of educated officers, for which legal provision has been made at the naval school, the vacancies caused by the neglect or omission to make nominations from the States in insurrection have been filled by the Secretary of the Navy. The school is now more full and complete than at any former period, and in every respect entitled to the favorable consideration of Congress.
I urge you to consider the Secretary of the Navy's suggestions about promoting and training seamen, as well as educating officers and engineers for the naval service. The Naval Academy is doing an excellent job preparing midshipmen for the important responsibilities they will have later in life. To ensure the country has enough qualified officers, as legally required by the naval school, the Secretary of the Navy has filled the vacancies created by the lack of nominations from the states in rebellion. The school is now more comprehensive and well-equipped than ever before and deserves Congress's favorable attention.
During the past fiscal year the financial condition of the Post-Office Department has been one of increasing prosperity, and I am gratified in being able to state that the actual postal revenue has nearly equaled the entire expenditures, the latter amounting to $11,314,206.84 and the former to $11,163,789.59, leaving a deficiency of but $150,417.25. In 1860, the year immediately preceding the rebellion, the deficiency amounted to $5,656,705.49, the postal receipts of that year being $2,645,722.19 less that those of 1863. The decrease since 1860 in the annual amount of transportation has been only about twenty-five per cent, but the annual expenditure on account of the same has been reduced thirty-five per cent. It is manifest, therefore, that the Post-Office Department may become self-sustaining in a few years, even with the restoration of the whole service.
During the past fiscal year, the financial situation of the Post-Office Department has improved significantly, and I'm pleased to report that the actual postal revenue has nearly matched total expenditures, which were $11,314,206.84, while revenue came to $11,163,789.59, leaving a shortfall of just $150,417.25. In 1860, the year just before the rebellion, the shortfall was $5,656,705.49, with that year’s postal receipts being $2,645,722.19 less than those of 1863. Since 1860, the annual transportation costs have only decreased by about twenty-five percent, but the annual spending related to it has been cut by thirty-five percent. Clearly, the Post-Office Department could become self-sustaining in a few years, even with the restoration of full service.
The international conference of postal delegates from the principal countries of Europe and America, which was called at the suggestion of the Postmaster-General, met at Paris on the 11th of May last and concluded its deliberations on the 8th of June. The principles established by the conference as best adapted to facilitate postal intercourse between nations and as the basis of future postal conventions inaugurate a general system of uniform international charges at reduced rates of postage, and can not fail to produce beneficial results.
The international conference of postal delegates from the main countries in Europe and America, which was organized at the suggestion of the Postmaster-General, took place in Paris from May 11 to June 8. The principles set by the conference, aimed at improving postal communication between countries and serving as the foundation for future postal agreements, introduce a uniform international pricing system with lower postage rates, and are sure to bring positive outcomes.
I refer you to the report of the Secretary of the Interior, which is herewith laid before you, for useful and varied information in relation to the public lands, Indian affairs, patents, pensions, and other matters of public concern pertaining to his Department.
I direct your attention to the report from the Secretary of the Interior, which is provided here for valuable and diverse information regarding public lands, Indian affairs, patents, pensions, and other issues of public interest related to his Department.
The quantity of land disposed of during the last and the first quarter of the present fiscal years was 3,841,549 acres, of which 161,911 acres were sold for cash, 1,456,514 acres were taken up under the homestead law, and the residue disposed of under laws granting lands for military bounties, for railroad and other purposes. It also appears that the sale of the public lands is largely on the increase.
The amount of land sold during the last and first quarters of this fiscal year was 3,841,549 acres, with 161,911 acres sold for cash, 1,456,514 acres taken under the homestead law, and the rest sold under laws that grant land for military bounties, railroads, and other purposes. It also looks like the sale of public lands is significantly increasing.
It has long been a cherished opinion of some of our wisest statesmen that the people of the United States had a higher and more enduring interest in the early settlement and substantial cultivation of the public lands than in the amount of direct revenue to be derived from the sale of them. This opinion has had a controlling influence in shaping legislation upon the subject of our national domain. I may cite as evidence of this the liberal measures adopted in reference to actual settlers; the grant to the States of the overflowed lands within their limits, in order to their being reclaimed and rendered fit for cultivation; the grants to railway companies of alternate sections of land upon the contemplated lines of their roads, which when completed will so largely multiply the facilities for reaching our distant possessions. This policy has received its most signal and beneficent illustration in the recent enactment granting homesteads to actual settlers. Since the 1st day of January last the before-mentioned quantity of 1,456,514 acres of land have been taken up under its provisions. This fact and the amount of sales furnish gratifying evidence of increasing settlement upon the public lands, notwithstanding the great struggle in which the energies of the nation have been engaged, and which has required so large a withdrawal of our citizens from their accustomed pursuits. I cordially concur in the recommendation of the Secretary of the Interior suggesting a modification of the act in favor of those engaged in the military and naval service of the United States. I doubt not that Congress will cheerfully adopt such measures as will, without essentially changing the general features of the system, secure to the greatest practicable extent its benefits to those who have left their homes in the defense of the country in this arduous crisis.
For a long time, some of our smartest leaders have believed that the people of the United States have a greater and more lasting interest in the early settlement and proper development of public lands than in the direct revenue gained from selling them. This belief has greatly influenced legislation about our national territory. I can provide examples, such as the generous measures taken for actual settlers; the grants to states of flooded lands within their borders, so they can be reclaimed and made suitable for farming; and the grants to railway companies of alternate land sections along their proposed routes, which will significantly improve access to our far-off holdings once completed. This policy has been most clearly and positively demonstrated with the recent law that provides homesteads to actual settlers. Since January 1st of this year, a total of 1,456,514 acres of land have been claimed under its provisions. This fact, along with the sales amount, shows encouraging evidence of increased settlement on public lands, despite the intense struggle the nation is involved in, which has required many citizens to step away from their usual work. I fully support the Secretary of the Interior's recommendation to adjust the act to benefit those serving in the military and naval forces of the United States. I am confident that Congress will gladly implement measures that, without fundamentally altering the overall system, will maximize its benefits for those who have left their homes to defend the country during this challenging time.
I invite your attention to the views of the Secretary as to the propriety of raising by appropriate legislation a revenue from the mineral lands of the United States.
I would like to bring your attention to the Secretary's views on the appropriateness of generating revenue from the mineral lands of the United States through suitable legislation.
The measures provided at your last session for the removal of certain Indian tribes have been carried into effect. Sundry treaties have been negotiated, which will in due time be submitted for the constitutional action of the Senate. They contain stipulations for extinguishing the possessory rights of the Indians to large and valuable tracts of lands. It is hoped that the effect of these treaties will result in the establishment of permanent friendly relations with such of these tribes as have been brought into frequent and bloody collision with our outlying settlements and emigrants. Sound policy and our imperative duty to these wards of the Government demand our anxious and constant attention to their material well-being, to their progress in the arts of civilization, and, above all, to that moral training which under the blessing of Divine Providence will confer upon them the elevated and sanctifying influences, the hopes and consolations, of the Christian faith.
The plans discussed in your last meeting for relocating certain Indian tribes have been put into action. Several treaties have been negotiated, which will eventually be submitted for the Senate's constitutional approval. These treaties include agreements to end the Indians' rights to large and valuable land areas. We hope that these treaties will lead to lasting friendly relations with the tribes that have frequently clashed with our remote settlements and emigrants. A thoughtful approach and our obligation to these groups require our ongoing attention to their well-being, their development in the arts of civilization, and, most importantly, their moral education, which, with Divine Providence's blessing, will provide them with the uplifting and sanctifying benefits, hopes, and comforts of the Christian faith.
I suggested in my last annual message the propriety of remodeling our Indian system. Subsequent events have satisfied me of its necessity. The details set forth in the report of the Secretary evince the urgent need for immediate legislative action.
I recommended in my last annual message that we remodel our Indian system. Recent events have convinced me that this is necessary. The details in the Secretary's report show the urgent need for immediate legislative action.
I commend the benevolent institutions established or patronized by the Government in this District to your generous and fostering care.
I commend the charitable organizations set up or supported by the Government in this District to your generous and nurturing attention.
The attention of Congress during the last session was engaged to some extent with a proposition for enlarging the water communication between the Mississippi River and the northeastern seaboard, which proposition, however, failed for the time. Since then, upon a call of the greatest respectability, a convention has been held at Chicago upon the same subject, a summary of whose views is contained in a memorial addressed to the President and Congress, and which I now have the honor to lay before you. That this interest is one which ere long will force its own way I do not entertain a doubt, while it is submitted entirely to your wisdom as to what can be done now. Augmented interest is given to this subject by the actual commencement of work upon the Pacific Railroad, under auspices so favorable to rapid progress and completion. The enlarged navigation becomes a palpable need to the great road.
During the last session, Congress focused somewhat on a proposal to improve the waterway connection between the Mississippi River and the northeastern coast, but that proposal didn't succeed this time. Since then, a highly respected convention was held in Chicago on the same topic, and I've got a summary of their views in a memorial addressed to the President and Congress, which I’m now presenting to you. I have no doubt that this interest will eventually push through on its own, while it’s entirely up to your judgment to decide what can be done right now. This issue has gained even more importance with the recent start of work on the Pacific Railroad, which is backed by strong support for quick progress and completion. The improved navigation has become a clear necessity for the major railroad.
I transmit the second annual report of the Commissioner of the Department of Agriculture, asking your attention to the developments in that vital interest of the nation.
I’m sending you the second annual report from the Commissioner of the Department of Agriculture, and I encourage you to take a look at the developments in this crucial area for our nation.
When Congress assembled a year ago, the war had already lasted nearly twenty months, and there had been many conflicts on both land and sea, with varying results; the rebellion had been pressed back into reduced limits; yet the tone of public feeling and opinion, at home and abroad, was not satisfactory. With other signs, the popular elections then just past indicated uneasiness among ourselves, while, amid much that was cold and menacing, the kindest words coming from Europe were uttered in accents of pity that we are too blind to surrender a hopeless cause. Our commerce was suffering greatly by a few armed vessels built upon and furnished from foreign shores, and we were threatened with such additions from the same quarter as would sweep our trade from the sea and raise our blockade. We had failed to elicit from European governments anything hopeful upon this subject. The preliminary emancipation proclamation, issued in September, was running its assigned period to the beginning of the new year. A month later the final proclamation came, including the announcement that colored men of suitable condition would be received into the war service. The policy of emancipation and of employing black soldiers gave to the future a new aspect, about which hope and fear and doubt contended in uncertain conflict. According to our political system, as a matter of civil administration, the General Government had no lawful power to effect emancipation in any State, and for a long time it had been hoped that the rebellion could be suppressed without resorting to it as a military measure. It was all the while deemed possible that the necessity for it might come, and that if it should the crisis of the contest would then be presented. It came, and, as was anticipated, it was followed by dark and doubtful days. Eleven months having now passed, we are permitted to take another review. The rebel borders are pressed still farther back, and by the complete opening of the Mississippi the country dominated by the rebellion is divided into distinct parts, with no practical communication between them. Tennessee and Arkansas have been substantially cleared of insurgent control, and influential citizens in each, owners of slaves and advocates of slavery at the beginning of the rebellion, now declare openly for emancipation in their respective States. Of those States not included in the emancipation proclamation, Maryland and Missouri, neither of which three years ago would tolerate any restraint upon the extension of slavery into new Territories, dispute now only as to the best mode of removing it within their own limits.
When Congress came together a year ago, the war had already been going on for nearly twenty months, with many battles fought both on land and at sea, yielding mixed results. The rebellion was pushed back to smaller areas, but the overall mood and sentiment, both at home and abroad, were not reassuring. The recent elections highlighted our unease, and amidst a lot of negativity and threats, the kindest comments from Europe were filled with pity for us, suggesting we were too blind to give up a lost cause. Our trade was suffering significantly due to a few armed ships built and equipped overseas, and we were in danger of even more from the same sources that could wipe out our commerce and break our blockade. We had received no hopeful responses from European governments on this issue. The preliminary emancipation proclamation issued in September was nearing its deadline by the start of the new year. A month later, the final proclamation came, announcing that qualified Black men would be accepted into military service. The policies of emancipation and employing Black soldiers changed the future, stirring a mix of hope, fear, and doubt. According to our political system, the federal government had no legal authority to enforce emancipation in any state, and there had long been hope that the rebellion could be suppressed without resorting to it as a military strategy. It was always considered possible that the need for it might arise, and if it did, it would represent a turning point in the conflict. That moment arrived, and as expected, it brought about dark and uncertain times. Now, eleven months later, we can take another look. The rebel territories have been pushed back further, and with the complete opening of the Mississippi, the areas controlled by the rebels are now cut into separate regions with no practical communication between them. Tennessee and Arkansas have largely been freed from insurgent control, and leading citizens in both states, who were slave owners and proponents of slavery at the start of the rebellion, are now publicly supporting emancipation in their respective states. Among the states not covered by the emancipation proclamation, Maryland and Missouri, which three years ago wouldn’t accept any limitations on the expansion of slavery into new territories, are now only debating the best way to eliminate it within their borders.
Of those who were slaves at the beginning of the rebellion full 100,000 are now in the United States military service, about one-half of which number actually bear arms in the ranks, thus giving the double advantage of taking so much labor from the insurgent cause and supplying the places which otherwise must be filled with so many white men. So far as tested, it is difficult to say they are not as good soldiers as any. No servile insurrection or tendency to violence or cruelty has marked the measures of emancipation and arming the blacks. These measures have been much discussed in foreign countries, and, contemporary with such discussion, the tone of public sentiment there is much improved. At home the same measures have been fully discussed, supported, criticized, and denounced, and the annual elections following are highly encouraging to those whose official duty it is to bear the country through this great trial. Thus we have the new reckoning. The crisis which threatened to divide the friends of the Union is past.
Of the 100,000 people who were enslaved at the start of the rebellion, about half are now serving in the U.S. military, with many actually fighting on the front lines. This benefits us by reducing the labor pool available to the insurgents and allowing us to replace white soldiers who might otherwise be needed in combat. Based on what we've seen, it's hard to say they aren't just as good soldiers as anyone else. There haven't been any slave uprisings or violent actions associated with the efforts to free and arm Black people. These actions have been widely debated in other countries, and during this discussion, public opinion there has improved significantly. At home, the same measures have been thoroughly examined, with supporters, critics, and opponents voicing their opinions, and the results of recent elections are very encouraging for those tasked with guiding the nation through this significant challenge. This marks a new chapter. The crisis that threatened to split the Union's supporters is over.
Looking now to the present and future, and with reference to a resumption of the national authority within the States wherein that authority has been suspended, I have thought fit to issue a proclamation, a copy of which is herewith transmitted. On examination of this proclamation it will appear, as is believed, that nothing will be attempted beyond what is amply justified by the Constitution. True, the form of an oath is given, but no man is coerced to take it. The man is promised a pardon only in case he voluntarily takes the oath. The Constitution authorizes the Executive to grant or withhold the pardon at his own absolute discretion, and this includes the power to grant on terms, as is fully established by judicial and other authorities.
Looking at the present and future, and regarding the restoration of national authority in the States where it has been interrupted, I’ve decided to issue a proclamation, a copy of which is included here. Upon reviewing this proclamation, it should be clear that nothing proposed goes beyond what is fully supported by the Constitution. Yes, there is a form of an oath, but no one is forced to take it. A person is offered a pardon only if they willingly take the oath. The Constitution gives the Executive the right to grant or deny the pardon at their complete discretion, which includes the authority to set conditions, as established by legal and other sources.
It is also proffered that if in any of the States named a State government shall be in the mode prescribed set up, such government shall be recognized and guaranteed by the United States, and that under it the State shall, on the constitutional conditions, be protected against invasion and domestic violence. The constitutional obligation of the United States to guarantee to every State in the Union a republican form of government and to protect the State in the cases stated is explicit and full. But why tender the benefits of this provision only to a State government set up in this particular way? This section of the Constitution contemplates a case wherein the element within a State favorable to republican government in the Union may be too feeble for an opposite and hostile element external to or even within the State, and such are precisely the cases with which we are now dealing.
It’s also suggested that if any of the named States establishes a government in the prescribed manner, the United States will recognize and guarantee that government. Under this government, the State will be protected against invasion and domestic violence based on constitutional conditions. The U.S. has a clear and full constitutional obligation to guarantee every State in the Union a republican form of government and to protect the State in these situations. But why offer the benefits of this provision only to a State government formed in this specific way? This section of the Constitution addresses situations where the elements within a State that support republican government may be too weak against an opposing and hostile element, whether outside or even within the State, which is exactly the situation we are currently facing.
An attempt to guarantee and protect a revived State government, constructed in whole or in preponderating part from the very element against whose hostility and violence it is to be protected, is simply absurd. There must be a test by which to separate the opposing elements, so as to build only from the sound; and that test is a sufficiently liberal one which accepts as sound whoever will make a sworn recantation of his former unsoundness.
An effort to ensure and safeguard a restored State government, built mostly or entirely from the very group it needs protection from, is just ridiculous. There has to be a way to distinguish between opposing sides to construct only from the reliable ones; and that way is quite generous, allowing anyone who publicly renounces their previous harmful beliefs to be considered trustworthy.
But if it be proper to require as a test of admission to the political body an oath of allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and to the Union under it, why also to the laws and proclamations in regard to slavery? Those laws and proclamations were enacted and put forth for the purpose of aiding in the suppression of the rebellion. To give them their fullest effect there had to be a pledge for their maintenance. In my judgment, they have aided and will further aid the cause for which they were intended. To now abandon them would be not only to relinquish a lever of power, but would also be a cruel and an astounding breach of faith. I may add at this point that while I remain in my present position I shall not attempt to retract or modify the emancipation proclamation, nor shall I return to slavery any person who is free by the terms of that proclamation or by any of the acts of Congress. For these and other reasons it is thought best that support of these measures shall be included in the oath, and it is believed the Executive may lawfully claim it in return for pardon and restoration of forfeited rights, which he has clear constitutional power to withhold altogether or grant upon the terms which he shall deem wisest for the public interest. It should be observed also that this part of the oath is subject to the modifying and abrogating power of legislation and supreme judicial decision.
But if it’s appropriate to require a pledge of loyalty to the Constitution of the United States and to the Union it governs as a test for entering the political community, why should there also be a pledge to follow the laws and proclamations regarding slavery? Those laws and proclamations were created to help suppress the rebellion. To ensure they had their full effect, there had to be a commitment to uphold them. In my opinion, they have helped and will continue to help the cause they were intended to support. To abandon them now would not only mean giving up a significant source of power, but it would also be a cruel and shocking breach of trust. I want to make it clear that while I hold my current position, I will not attempt to take back or change the emancipation proclamation, nor will I return any person who is free by the terms of that proclamation or by any acts of Congress to slavery. For these and other reasons, it seems best that support for these measures be included in the oath, and it is believed that the Executive can lawfully require it in exchange for pardon and restoration of lost rights, which he has clear constitutional authority to withhold completely or grant under terms he considers best for the public good. It should also be noted that this part of the oath is subject to the modifying and cancelling power of legislation and supreme court rulings.
The proposed acquiescence of the National Executive in any reasonable temporary State arrangement for the freed people is made with the view of possibly modifying the confusion and destitution which must at best attend all classes by a total revolution of labor throughout whole States. It is hoped that the already deeply afflicted people in those States may be somewhat more ready to give up the cause of their affliction if to this extent this vital matter be left to themselves, while no power of the National Executive to prevent an abuse is abridged by the proposition.
The suggested agreement from the National Executive on any reasonable temporary state arrangement for the freed people aims to possibly ease the confusion and hardship that will inevitably impact all groups due to a complete overhaul of labor in entire states. It's hoped that the already suffering individuals in those states might be a little more willing to abandon the source of their suffering if this crucial issue is left to their own discretion, while the National Executive's ability to prevent any misuse remains intact with this suggestion.
The suggestion in the proclamation as to maintaining the political framework of the States on what is called reconstruction is made in the hope that it may do good without danger of harm. It will save labor and avoid great confusion.
The proposal in the announcement about keeping the political structure of the States during what’s known as reconstruction is made with the hope that it can help without causing any issues. It will save effort and prevent a lot of chaos.
But why any proclamation now upon this subject? This question is beset with the conflicting views that the step might be delayed too long or be taken too soon. In some States the elements for resumption seem ready for action, but remain inactive apparently for want of a rallying point—a plan of action. Why shall A adopt the plan of B rather than B that of A? And if A and B should agree, how can they know but that the General Government here will reject their plan? By the proclamation a plan is presented which may be accepted by them as a rallying point, and which they are assured in advance will not be rejected here. This may bring them to act sooner than they otherwise would.
But why make any announcement about this topic right now? This question is complicated by the differing opinions on whether the decision should be postponed for too long or made too quickly. In some states, the conditions for moving forward seem ready, but they remain inactive, seemingly due to a lack of a central focus or a clear plan. Why should A follow B’s plan instead of B following A’s? And if A and B come to an agreement, how can they be sure that the federal government won’t reject their plan? By making this announcement, a plan is put forward that they can use as a point of reference, assuring them in advance that it won’t be dismissed here. This might push them to take action sooner than they would have otherwise.
The objections to a premature presentation of a plan by the National Executive consist in the danger of committals on points which could be more safely left to further developments. Care has been taken to so shape the document as to avoid embarrassments from this source. Saying that on certain terms certain classes will be pardoned with rights restored, it is not said that other classes or other terms will never be included. Saying that reconstruction will be accepted if presented in a specified way, it is not said it will never be accepted in any other way.
The concerns about prematurely sharing a plan from the National Executive arise from the risk of making commitments on issues that might be better left open for future developments. Efforts have been made to craft the document in a way that avoids potential complications. It states that certain groups will be pardoned and have their rights restored under specific conditions, but it does not claim that other groups or different conditions will never be included. It indicates that reconstruction will be approved if presented in a particular manner, but it does not assert that it will never be accepted in another form.
The movements by State action for emancipation in several of the States not included in the emancipation proclamation are matters of profound gratulation. And while I do not repeat in detail what I have heretofore so earnestly urged upon this subject my general views and feelings remain unchanged and I trust that Congress will omit no fair opportunity of aiding these important steps to a great consummation.
The actions taken by state governments for emancipation in several states not covered by the emancipation proclamation are truly commendable. While I won’t go into detail about what I’ve previously emphasized on this topic, my overall views and feelings haven’t changed, and I hope that Congress will seize every fair opportunity to support these significant steps towards a meaningful conclusion.
In the midst of other cares, however important we must not lose sight of the fact that the war power is still our main reliance. To that power alone we look yet for a time to give confidence to the people in the contested regions that the insurgent power will not again overrun them. Until that confidence shall be established little can be done anywhere what is called reconstruction. Hence our chiefest care must still be directed to the Army and Navy who have thus far borne their harder part so nobly and well; and it may be esteemed fortunate that giving the greatest efficiency to these indispensable arms we do also honorably recognize the gallant men, from commander to sentinel, who compose them, and to whom more than to others the world must stand indebted for the home of freedom disenthralled, regenerated, enlarged, and perpetuated.
In the midst of other important concerns, we must not forget that our military power is still our main source of support. We’re relying on that power to reassure the people in the contested areas that the insurgents will not take over again. Until that confidence is restored, there’s little that can be done regarding what is called reconstruction. Therefore, our main focus must continue to be on the Army and Navy, who have so far handled their difficult roles with great honor and skill. It’s fortunate that by maximizing the effectiveness of these essential forces, we also honor the brave men, from commanders to sentinels, who make up these ranks. We owe them more than anyone else for ensuring that our land of freedom is liberated, renewed, expanded, and sustained.
MESSAGE TO CONGRESS. WASHINGTON D. C., December 8, 1863.
TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
In conformity to the law of July 16, 1862, I most cordially recommend that Captain John Rogers United States Navy, receive a vote of thanks from Congress for the eminent skill and gallantry exhibited by him in the engagement with the rebel armed ironclad steamer Fingal, alias Atlanta, whilst in command of the United States ironclad steamer Weehawken, which led to her capture on the 17th June, 1863, and also for the zeal, bravery, and general good conduct shown by this officer on many occasions.
In accordance with the law of July 16, 1862, I wholeheartedly recommend that Captain John Rogers of the United States Navy be given a vote of thanks from Congress for his outstanding skill and courage shown during the encounter with the rebel ironclad steamer Fingal, also known as Atlanta, while he was in command of the United States ironclad steamer Weehawken, which led to its capture on June 17, 1863. I also commend him for the enthusiasm, bravery, and exemplary conduct he has demonstrated on numerous occasions.
This recommendation is specially made in order to comply with the requirements of the ninth section of the aforesaid act, which is in the following words, viz:
This recommendation is specifically made to meet the requirements of the ninth section of the aforementioned act, which states:
That any line officer of the Navy or Marine Corps may be advanced one grade if upon recommendation of the President by name he receives the thanks of Congress for highly distinguished conduct in conflict with the enemy or for extraordinary heroism in the line of his profession.
Any Navy or Marine Corps officer can be promoted one rank if, upon the President's recommendation, they receive a formal acknowledgment from Congress for exceptional behavior in combat against the enemy or for extraordinary bravery in their job.
MESSAGE TO THE SENATE. WASHINGTON, D. C., December 8, 1863.
TO THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES:
Congress, on my recommendation, passed a resolution, approved 7th February, 1863, tendering its thanks to Commander D. D. Porter "for the bravery and skill displayed in the attack on the post of Arkansas on the 10th January, 1863," and in consideration of those services, together with his efficient labors and vigilance subsequently displayed in thwarting the efforts of the rebels to obstruct the Mississippi and its tributaries and the important part rendered by the squadron under his command, which led to the surrender of Vicksburg.
Congress, following my recommendation, passed a resolution on February 7, 1863, expressing its gratitude to Commander D. D. Porter "for the bravery and skill shown in the attack on the post of Arkansas on January 10, 1863." In recognition of these services, as well as his effective efforts and vigilance in preventing the rebels from blocking the Mississippi and its tributaries, and the significant role played by the squadron under his command that led to the surrender of Vicksburg.
I do therefore, in conformity to the seventh section of the act approved 16th July, 1862, nominate Commander D. D. Porter to be a rear-admiral in the Navy on the active list from the 4th July, 1863, to fill an existing vacancy.
I hereby, in accordance with the seventh section of the act approved on July 16, 1862, nominate Commander D. D. Porter to be a rear-admiral in the Navy on the active list starting July 4, 1863, to fill a current vacancy.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
WASHINGTON, December 8, 1863.
MAJOR-GENERAL GRANT:
MG Grant:
Understanding that your lodgment at Chattanooga and Knoxville is now secure, I wish to tender you, and all under your command, my more than thanks, my profoundest gratitude, for the skill, courage, and perseverance with which you and they, over so great difficulties, have effected that important object. God bless you all!
Understanding that your position at Chattanooga and Knoxville is now secure, I want to express my deepest thanks and heartfelt gratitude to you and everyone under your command for the skill, courage, and perseverance with which you all have achieved that important goal despite significant challenges. God bless you all!
TO GOVERNOR CURTIN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 9, 1863
HIS EXCELLENCY A. G. CURTIN,
Governor A. G. Curtin,
Governor of Pennsylvania.
Governor of PA.
DEAR SIR:—I have to urge my illness, and the preparation of the message, in excuse for not having sooner transmitted you the inclosed from the Secretary of War and Provost Marshal General in response to yours in relation to recruiting in Pennsylvania. Though not quite as you desire, I hope the grounds taken will be reasonably satisfactory to you. Allow me to exchange congratulations with you on the organization of the House of Representatives, and especially on recent military events in Georgia and Tennessee.
DEAR SIR:—I must apologize for my illness and for not sending you the enclosed letter from the Secretary of War and Provost Marshal General sooner in response to your inquiry about recruiting in Pennsylvania. While it may not be exactly what you wanted, I hope the reasoning provided will be satisfactory to you. Let me take a moment to congratulate you on the organization of the House of Representatives, and especially on the recent military events in Georgia and Tennessee.
Yours very truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BUTLER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., December 10, 1863.
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, Va.:
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, VA:
Please suspend execution in any and all sentences of death in your department until further order.
Please pause the execution of all death sentences in your department until further notice.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 11, 1863.
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of the Potomac:
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of the Potomac:
Lieut. Col. James B. Knox, Tenth Regiment Pennsylvania Reserves, offers his resignation under circumstances inducing me to wish to accept it. But I prefer to know your pleasure upon the subject. Please answer.
Lieut. Col. James B. Knox, Tenth Regiment Pennsylvania Reserves, is resigning, and the situation makes me want to accept it. However, I would rather know your thoughts on this matter. Please respond.
TO JUDGE HOFFMAN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, December 15, 1863.
HON. OGDEN HOFFMAN, U. S. District Judge, San Francisco, Cal.:
HON. OGDEN HOFFMAN, U.S. District Judge, San Francisco, CA:
The oath in the proclamation of December 8 is intended for those who may voluntarily take it, and not for those who may be constrained to take it in order to escape actual imprisonment or punishment. It is intended that the latter class shall abide the granting or withholding of the pardoning power in the ordinary way.
The oath in the proclamation of December 8 is meant for those who choose to take it voluntarily, not for those who feel forced to take it just to avoid jail or punishment. The idea is that that latter group will wait for the usual process of the pardoning power to either grant or deny them.
TELEGRAM TO MARY GONYEAG.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 15, 1863.
MOTHER MARY GONYEAG, Superior, Academy of Visitation, Keokuk, Iowa:
MOTHER MARY GONYEAG, Superior, Academy of Visitation, Keokuk, Iowa:
The President has no authority as to whether you may raffle for the benevolent object you mention. If there is no objection in the Iowa laws, there is none here.
The President has no say over whether you can hold a raffle for the charitable cause you mentioned. If Iowa laws don't prohibit it, then it's not an issue here.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING DISCRIMINATING DUTIES, DECEMBER 16, 1863.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas by an act of the Congress of the United States of the 24th of May, 1828, entitled "An act in addition to an act entitled 'An act concerning discriminating duties of tonnage and impost' and to equalize the duties on Prussian vessels and their cargoes," it is provided that upon satisfactory evidence being given to the President of the United States by the government of any foreign nation that no discriminating duties of tonnage or impost are imposed or levied in the ports of the said nation upon vessels wholly belonging to citizens of the United States or upon the produce, manufactures, or merchandise imported in the same from the United States or from any foreign country, the President is thereby authorized to issue his proclamation declaring that the foreign discriminating duties of tonnage and impost within the United States are and shall be suspended and discontinued so far as respects the vessels of the said foreign nation and the produce, manufactures, or merchandise imported into the United States in the same from the said foreign nation or from any other foreign country, the said suspension to take effect from the time of such notification being given to the President of the United States and to continue so long as the reciprocal exemption of vessels belonging to citizens of the United States and their cargoes, as aforesaid, shall be continued, and no longer; and
Whereas an act of the Congress of the United States on May 24, 1828, titled "An act in addition to an act entitled 'An act concerning discriminating duties of tonnage and impost' and to equalize the duties on Prussian vessels and their cargoes," states that if the government of any foreign nation provides satisfactory evidence to the President of the United States that no discriminating duties of tonnage or impost are charged or collected in that nation’s ports on vessels fully owned by U.S. citizens or on the products, goods, or merchandise imported on those vessels from the U.S. or any foreign country, the President is authorized to issue a proclamation declaring that the foreign discriminating duties of tonnage and impost within the United States will be suspended and discontinued as it relates to the vessels of that foreign nation and the products, goods, or merchandise imported into the United States from that foreign nation or any other country. This suspension will take effect from the time the President receives such notification and will remain in effect as long as the reciprocal exemption of vessels owned by U.S. citizens and their cargoes is upheld, and not longer; and
Whereas satisfactory evidence has lately been received by me through an official communication of Senor Don Luis Molina, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Nicaragua, under date of the 28th of November, 1863, that no other or higher duties of tonnage and impost have been imposed or levied since the second day of August, 1838, in the ports of Nicaragua, upon vessels wholly belonging to citizens of the United States, and upon the produce, manufactures, or merchandise imported in the same from the United States, and from any foreign country whatever, than are levied on Nicaraguan ships and their cargoes in the same ports under like circumstances:
I recently received satisfactory evidence through an official communication from Senor Don Luis Molina, the Extraordinary Envoy and Minister Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Nicaragua, dated November 28, 1863. This communication confirms that since August 2, 1838, no additional or higher tonnage duties and imposts have been imposed or collected in Nicaraguan ports on vessels fully owned by U.S. citizens or on the produce, manufactured goods, or merchandise imported from the United States or any other foreign country. These duties are the same as those levied on Nicaraguan ships and their cargoes under similar conditions:
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America, do hereby declare and proclaim that so much of the several acts imposing discriminating duties of tonnage and impost within the United States are, and shall be, suspended and discontinued so far as respects the vessels of Nicaragua, and the produce, manufactures, and the merchandise imported into the United States in the same from the dominions of Nicaragua, and from any other foreign country whatever; the said suspension to take effect from the day above mentioned, and to continue thenceforward so long as the reciprocal exemption of the vessels of the United States, and the produce, manufactures, and merchandise imported into the dominions of Nicaragua in the same, as aforesaid, shall be continued on the part of the government of Nicaragua.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America, hereby declare that the various laws imposing different duties on tonnage and taxes within the United States are, and will be, suspended and ended regarding the vessels of Nicaragua, as well as the products, goods, and merchandise imported into the United States from Nicaragua and any other foreign country. This suspension will take effect from the date mentioned above and will continue as long as the reciprocal exemption for the vessels of the United States, and the products, goods, and merchandise imported into Nicaragua, continues to be upheld by the government of Nicaragua.
Given under my hand at the city of Washington, the sixteenth day of December, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-three, and the eighty-eighth of the Independence of the United States.
Given under my hand at the city of Washington, the 16th day of December, in the year of our Lord 1863, and the 88th of the Independence of the United States.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
MESSAGE TO CONGRESS,
DECEMBER 17, 1863.
TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES:
TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES:
Herewith I lay before you a letter addressed to myself by a committee of gentlemen representing the freedmen's aid societies in Boston, New York, Philadelphia, and Cincinnati. The subject of the letter, as indicated above, is one of great magnitude and importance, and one which these gentlemen, of known ability and high character, seem to have considered with great attention and care. Not having the time to form a mature judgment of my own as to whether the plan they suggest is the best, I submit the whole subject to Congress, deeming that their attention thereto is almost imperatively demanded.
Here, I present to you a letter addressed to me by a committee of gentlemen representing the freedmen's aid societies in Boston, New York, Philadelphia, and Cincinnati. The topic of the letter, as mentioned above, is very significant and important, and these gentlemen, known for their ability and integrity, appear to have considered it with great attention and care. Since I don't have the time to fully evaluate whether the plan they suggest is the best option, I am submitting the entire matter to Congress, believing their attention to it is urgently needed.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL HURLBUT.
[Cipher.]
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., December 17, 1863.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D.C., December 17, 1863.
MAJOR-GENERAL HURLBUT, Memphis, Tenn.:
MAJOR-GENERAL HURLBUT, Memphis, TN:
I understand you have under sentence of death, a tall old man, by the name of Henry F. Luckett. I personally knew him, and did not think him a bad man. Please do not let him be executed unless upon further order from me, and in the meantime send me a transcript of the record.
I understand you have a tall old man named Henry F. Luckett sentenced to death. I personally knew him and didn't think he was a bad guy. Please don't let him be executed unless I say so, and in the meantime, send me a transcript of the record.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, December 19, 1863.
GENERAL GRANT, Chattanooga, Tennessee:
GENERAL GRANT, Chattanooga, TN:
The Indiana delegation in Congress, or at least a large part of them, are very anxious that General Milroy shall enter active service again, and I share in this feeling. He is not a difficult man to satisfy, sincerity and courage being his strong traits. Believing in our cause, and wanting to fight for it, is the whole matter with him. Could you, without embarrassment, assign him a place, if directed to report to you?
The Indiana delegation in Congress, or at least a big part of them, is very eager for General Milroy to get back into active service, and I feel the same way. He’s not hard to please; sincerity and courage are his strongest qualities. He believes in our cause and wants to fight for it—that's what matters to him. Could you, without any hesitation, assign him a position if he is told to report to you?
TO SECRETARY STANTON.
(Private.)
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., December 21, 1863.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D.C., December 21, 1863.
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR.
Secretary of Defense.
MY DEAR SIR:—Sending a note to the Secretary of the Navy, as I promised, he called over and said that the strikes in the ship-yards had thrown the completion of vessels back so much that he thought General Gilimore's proposition entirely proper. He only wishes (and in which I concur) that General Gillmore will courteously confer with, and explain to, Admiral Dahlgren.
MY DEAR SIR:—I sent a note to the Secretary of the Navy, as I promised. He called and mentioned that the strikes at the shipyards have delayed the completion of the vessels so much that he thinks General Gilmore's proposal is entirely reasonable. He only hopes (and I agree) that General Gillmore will kindly discuss and explain this to Admiral Dahlgren.
In regard to the Western matter, I believe the program will have to stand substantially as I first put it. Henderson, and especially Brown, believe that the social influence of St. Louis would inevitably tell injuriously upon General Pope in the particular difficulty existing there, and I think there is some force in that view.
Concerning the Western issue, I think the plan will need to remain pretty much as I initially proposed. Henderson, and especially Brown, believe that the social dynamics in St. Louis could negatively affect General Pope amidst the specific challenges he's facing, and I think there’s some validity to that perspective.
As to retaining General Schofield temporarily, if this should be done, I believe I should scarcely be able to get his nomination through the Senate. Send me over his nomination, which, however, I am not quite ready to send to the Senate.
As for keeping General Schofield around for a bit, if that happens, I doubt I could get his nomination approved by the Senate. Please send me his nomination, but I'm not quite ready to send it to the Senate yet.
Yours as ever,
Always yours,
TO O. D. FILLEY.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 22, 1863.
O. D. FILLEY, ST. Louis, Missouri:
O. D. FILLEY, St. Louis, Missouri:
I have just looked over a petition signed by some three dozen citizens of St. Louis, and three accompanying letters, one by yourself, one by a Mr. Nathan Ranney, and one by a Mr. John D. Coalter, the whole relating to the Rev. Dr. McPheeters. The petition prays, in the name of justice and mercy, that I will restore Dr. McPheeters to all his ecclesiastical rights. This gives no intimation as to what ecclesiastical rights are withheld.
I just reviewed a petition signed by about thirty-six residents of St. Louis, along with three letters—one from you, one from Mr. Nathan Ranney, and one from Mr. John D. Coalter—all concerning Rev. Dr. McPheeters. The petition asks, in the name of justice and mercy, that I restore Dr. McPheeters to all his church-related rights. It doesn't specify which rights are being denied.
Your letter states that Provost-Marshal Dick, about a year ago, ordered the arrest of Dr. McPheeters, pastor of the Vine Street Church, prohibited him from officiating, and placed the management of the affairs of the church out of the control of its chosen trustees; and near the close you state that a certain course "would insure his release." Mr. Ranney's letter says: "Dr. Samuel S. McPheeters is enjoying all the rights of a civilian, but cannot preach the Gospel!!!!" Mr. Coalter, in his letter, asks: "Is it not a strange illustration of the condition of things, that the question of who shall be allowed to preach in a church in St. Louis shall be decided by the President of the United States?"
Your letter says that Provost-Marshal Dick, about a year ago, ordered the arrest of Dr. McPheeters, the pastor of the Vine Street Church, banned him from preaching, and took control of the church's affairs away from its elected trustees; and towards the end, you mention that a certain action "would ensure his release." Mr. Ranney's letter states: "Dr. Samuel S. McPheeters is enjoying all the rights of a civilian, but cannot preach the Gospel!!!!" Mr. Coalter, in his letter, asks: "Is it not a strange illustration of the current situation that the question of who is allowed to preach in a church in St. Louis is decided by the President of the United States?"
Now, all this sounds very strangely; and, withal, a little as if you gentlemen making the application do not understand the case alike; one affirming that the doctor is enjoying all the rights of a civilian, and another pointing out to me what will secure his release! On the second day of January last, I wrote to General Curtis in relation to Mr. Dick's order upon Dr. McPheeters; and, as I suppose the doctor is enjoying all the rights of a civilian, I only quote that part of my letter which relates to the church. It is as follows: "But I must add that the United States Government must not, as by this order, undertake to run the churches. When an individual, in a church or out of it, becomes dangerous to the public interest, he must be checked; but the churches, as such, must take care of themselves. It will not do for the United States to appoint trustees, supervisors, or other agents for the churches."
Now, this all sounds very strange, and it also seems like you gentlemen who are making the request don’t fully understand the situation; one person claiming that the doctor has all the rights of a civilian, and another pointing out what needs to be done to secure his release! On January 2nd of last year, I wrote to General Curtis regarding Mr. Dick's order pertaining to Dr. McPheeters; and since I assume the doctor is enjoying all the rights of a civilian, I will only quote the part of my letter that relates to the church. It is as follows: "But I must add that the United States Government must not, through this order, attempt to manage the churches. When an individual, whether in a church or outside of it, poses a danger to the public interest, he must be restrained; but the churches, as institutions, must look after themselves. It is not appropriate for the United States to appoint trustees, supervisors, or other agents for the churches."
This letter going to General Curtis, then in command there, I supposed, of course, it was obeyed, especially as I heard no further complaint from Dr. McPheeters or his friends for nearly an entire year. I have never interfered, nor thought of interfering, as to who shall or shall not preach in any church; nor have I knowingly or believingly tolerated any one else to so interfere by my authority. If any one is so interfering by color of my authority, I would like to have it specifically made known to me. If, after all, what is now sought is to have me put Dr. McPheeters back over the heads of a majority of his own congregation, that, too, will be declined. I will not have control of any church on any side.
This letter is going to General Curtis, who was in charge there. I assumed it was followed, especially since I didn’t hear any more complaints from Dr. McPheeters or his friends for almost a whole year. I have never interfered, nor have I thought about interfering, with who preaches in any church; nor have I knowingly let anyone else do so under my authority. If someone is interfering using my authority, I would like it to be made clear to me. If what’s being asked now is for me to reinstate Dr. McPheeters over the majority of his own congregation, that will also be refused. I won’t control any church, no matter which side it’s on.
Yours respectfully,
Respectfully yours,
TELEGRAM TO MILITARY COMMANDER AT POINT LOOKOUT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 22, 1863.
MILITARY COMMANDER, Point Lookout, Md.:
MILITARY COMMANDER, Point Lookout, MD:
If you have a prisoner by the name Linder—Daniel Linder, I think, and certainly the son of U. F. Linder, of Illinois, please send him to me by an officer.
If you have a prisoner named Linder—Daniel Linder, I believe, and definitely the son of U. F. Linder, from Illinois, please have an officer send him to me.
TELEGRAM TO MILITARY COMMANDER AT POINT LOOKOUT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., December 24, 1863.
MILITARY COMMANDER, Point Lookout, Md.:
MILITARY COMMANDER, Point Lookout, MD:
If you send Linder to me as directed a day or two ago, also send Edwin C. Claybrook, of Ninth Virginia rebel cavalry.
If you send Linder to me as instructed a day or two ago, also send Edwin C. Claybrook from the Ninth Virginia rebel cavalry.
TELEGRAM TO U. F. LINDER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON D. C., December 26, 1863.
HON. U. F. LINDER, Chicago, Ill.: Your son Dan has just left me with my order to the Secretary of War, to administer to him the oath of allegiance, discharge him and send him to you.
HON. U. F. LINDER, Chicago, Ill.: Your son Dan just left me with my order for the Secretary of War to give him the oath of allegiance, discharge him, and send him back to you.
TO GENERAL N. P. BANKS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 29, 1863.
MAJOR-GENERAL BANKS:
MAJOR GENERAL BANKS:
Yours of the sixteenth is received, and I send you, as covering the ground of it, a copy of my answer to yours of the sixth, it being possible the original may not reach you. I intend you to be master in every controversy made with you.
I got your letter from the sixteenth, and I'm sending you a copy of my response to your letter from the sixth, just in case the original doesn't make it to you. I want you to be in charge of every debate we have.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BUTLER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., December 30, 1863.
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, Va.:
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, VA:
Jacob Bowers is fully pardoned for past offence, upon condition that he returns to duty and re-enlists for three years or during the war.
Jacob Bowers is fully pardoned for his past offense, on the condition that he returns to duty and re-enlists for three years or for the duration of the war.
TO SECRETARY STANTON.
EXECUTIVE MANSION WASHINGTON, December 31, 1863.
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR.
Secretary of War.
SIR:—Please fix up the department to which Curtis is to go, without waiting to wind up the Missouri matter. Lane is very anxious to have Fort Smith in it, and I am willing, unless there be decided military reasons to the contrary, in which case of course, I am not for it. It will oblige me to have the Curtis department fixed at once.
SIR:—Please arrange the department that Curtis will be assigned to without waiting to finish the Missouri issue. Lane is really eager to include Fort Smith in it, and I'm fine with that unless there are strong military reasons against it; in that case, I won’t support it. I would appreciate it if the Curtis department could be organized right away.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
1864
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL SULLIVAN.
Message to General Sullivan.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D.C., January 1, 1864. 3.30 p.m.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D.C., January 1, 1864. 3:30 PM.
GENERAL SULLIVAN, Harper's Ferry:
GENERAL SULLIVAN, Harper's Ferry:
Have you anything new from Winchester, Martinsburg or thereabouts?
Do you have any updates from Winchester, Martinsburg, or nearby?
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR PIERPOINT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., January 2, 1864.
GOVERNOR PIERPOINT, Alexandria, Va.:
GOVERNOR PIERPOINT, Alexandria, VA:
Please call and see me to-day if not too inconvenient.
Please call and see me today if it's not too much trouble.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BUTLER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 2, 1864
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER.
Major General Butler.
SIR:—The Secretary of War and myself have concluded to discharge of the prisoners at Point Lookout the following classes: First, those who will take the oath prescribed in the proclamation of December 8, and issued by the consent of General Marston, will enlist in our service. Second, those who will take the oath and be discharged and whose homes lie safely within our military lines.
SIR:—The Secretary of War and I have decided to release the prisoners at Point Lookout in the following categories: First, those who will take the oath outlined in the proclamation from December 8, issued with General Marston's consent, and enlist in our service. Second, those who will take the oath, be released, and whose homes are safely within our military lines.
I send by Mr. Hay this letter and a blank-book and some other blanks, the way of using which I propose for him to explain verbally better than I can in writing.
I am sending this letter, along with a blank notebook and some other forms, with Mr. Hay. I think he can explain how to use them verbally better than I can in writing.
Yours, very truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 5, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE:
MAJOR GENERAL MEADE:
If not inconsistent with the service, please allow General William Harrow as long a leave of absence as the rules permit with the understanding that I may lengthen it if I see fit. He is an acquaintance and friend of mine, and his family matters very urgently require his presence.
If it doesn't disrupt service, please grant General William Harrow as long of a leave of absence as the rules allow, with the understanding that I may extend it if I choose. He is a friend of mine, and his family issues urgently need his attention.
MESSAGE TO CONGRESS,
JANUARY 5, 1864.
GENTLEMEN OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
GENTLEMEN OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
By a joint resolution of your honorable bodies approved December 23, 1863, the paying of bounties to veteran volunteers, as now practiced by the War Department, is, to the extent of three hundred dollars in each case, prohibited after this 5th day of the present month. I transmit for your consideration a communication from the Secretary of War, accompanied by one from the Provost-Marshal General to him, both relating to the subject above mentioned. I earnestly recommend that the law be so modified as to allow bounties to be paid as they now are, at least until the ensuing 1st day of February.
By a joint resolution of your honorable bodies approved December 23, 1863, the payment of bounties to veteran volunteers, as currently practiced by the War Department, is prohibited after this 5th day of the current month, up to three hundred dollars in each case. I am forwarding for your consideration a message from the Secretary of War, along with one from the Provost-Marshal General addressed to him, both concerning the above topic. I strongly recommend that the law be changed to allow bounties to continue being paid as they currently are, at least until the upcoming 1st day of February.
I am not without anxiety lest I appear to be importunate in thus recalling your attention to a subject upon which you have so recently acted, and nothing but a deep conviction that the public interest demands it could induce me to incur the hazard of being misunderstood on this point. The Executive approval was given by me to the resolution mentioned, and it is now by a closer attention and a fuller knowledge of facts that I feel constrained to recommend a reconsideration of the subject.
I worry that I may come across as pushy by bringing up a topic you just addressed, but I truly believe that the public interest requires me to risk being misinterpreted on this matter. I approved the resolution mentioned, and after a more careful look and a deeper understanding of the facts, I feel it's necessary to suggest we revisit this issue.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 6, 1864. 2 P.M.
GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE, Frankfort, Kentucky:
GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE, Frankfort, KY:
Yours of yesterday received. Nothing is known here about General Foster's order, of which you complain, beyond the fair presumption that it comes from General Grant, and that it has an object which, if you understood, you would be loath to frustrate. True, these troops are, in strict law, only to be removed by my order; but General Grant's judgment would be the highest incentive to me to make such order. Nor can I understand how doing so is bad faith and dishonor, nor yet how it so exposes Kentucky to ruin. Military men here do not perceive how it exposes Kentucky, and I am sure Grant would not permit it if it so appeared to him.
I received your message from yesterday. There's no information here about General Foster's order, which you are unhappy about, other than the reasonable assumption that it comes from General Grant and has a purpose that you would hesitate to undermine if you truly understood it. It’s true that these troops can only be moved by my command according to the law, but General Grant's judgment would be the main reason for me to issue such an order. I also can’t see how doing so equates to bad faith or dishonor, nor how it puts Kentucky at risk of destruction. The military personnel here don’t see how it endangers Kentucky, and I’m sure Grant wouldn’t allow it if he thought it did.
TO GENERAL Q. A. GILLMORE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 13, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL GILLMORE:
MAJ. GEN. GILLMORE:
I understand an effort is being made by some worthy gentlemen to reconstruct a legal State government in Florida. Florida is in your Department, and it is not unlikely you may be there in person. I have given Mr. Hay a commission of major, and sent him to you, with some blank-books and other blanks, to aid in the reconstruction. He will explain as to the manner of using the blanks, and also my general views on the subject. It is desirable for all to co-operate, but if irreconcilable differences of opinion shall arise, you are master. I wish the thing done in the most speedy way, so that when done it be within the range of the late proclamation on the subject. The detail labor will, of course, have to be done by others; but I will be greatly obliged if you will give it such general supervision as you can find consistent with your more strictly military duties.
I understand that some dedicated individuals are working to rebuild a legitimate state government in Florida. Florida falls under your department, and it's likely you will be there in person. I have given Mr. Hay a commission as a major and sent him to you with some blank books and other forms to assist in the reconstruction. He will explain how to use the forms and also share my overall thoughts on the matter. It's important for everyone to work together, but if serious disagreements come up, you are in charge. I want this done quickly so that it aligns with the recent proclamation on the topic. The detailed work will have to be handled by others, but I would really appreciate it if you could provide general oversight as much as it fits with your other military responsibilities.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BROUGH. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 15,
1864.
1864.
GOVERNOR BROUGH, Columbus, Ohio:
GOVERNOR BROUGH, Columbus, OH:
If Private William G. Toles, of Fifty-ninth Ohio Volunteers, returns to his regiment and faithfully serves out his term, he is fully pardoned for all military offenses prior to this.
If Private William G. Toles, of the Fifty-ninth Ohio Volunteers, goes back to his regiment and faithfully completes his term, he is completely pardoned for all military offenses that happened before this.
TO CROSBY AND NICHOLS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 16, 1864.
MESSRS. CROSBY AND NICHOLS.
Crosby and Nichols.
GENTLEMEN: The number for this month and year of the North American Review was duly received, and for which please accept my thanks. Of course I am not the most impartial judge; yet, with due allowance for this, I venture to hope that the article entitled "The President's Policy" will be of value to the country. I fear I am not worthy of all which is therein kindly said of me personally.
GENTLEMEN: I received the latest issue of the North American Review for this month and year, and I appreciate it. I know I may not be the most unbiased reviewer; however, I hope that the article titled "The President's Policy" will be beneficial to the country. I worry that I don’t deserve all the kind words said about me in it.
The sentence of twelve lines, commencing at the top of page 252, I could wish to be not exactly what it is. In what is there expressed, the writer has not correctly understood me. I have never had a theory that secession could absolve States or people from their obligations. Precisely the contrary is asserted in the inaugural address; and it was because of my belief in the continuation of those obligations that I was puzzled, for a time, as to denying the legal rights of those citizens who remained individually innocent of treason or rebellion. But I mean no more now than to merely call attention to this point.
The twelve-line statement at the top of page 252 is not quite what I would prefer. The writer has misunderstood me. I’ve never believed that secession could free states or people from their responsibilities. In fact, I stated the opposite in my inaugural address. It was my belief in those ongoing responsibilities that led me to struggle for a while with denying the legal rights of citizens who were personally innocent of treason or rebellion. I just want to highlight this point.
Yours respectfully,
Sincerely,
TO GENERAL P. STEELE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 20, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL STEELE:
MAJOR-GENERAL STEELE
Sundry citizens of the State of Arkansas petition me that an election may be held in that State, at which to elect a Governor; that it be assumed at that election, and thenceforward, that the constitution and laws of the State, as before the rebellion, are in full force, except that the constitution is so modified as to declare that there shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except in the punishment of crimes whereof the party shall have been duly convicted; that the General Assembly may make such provisions for the freed people as shall recognize and declare their permanent freedom, and provide for their education, and which may yet be construed as a temporary arrangement suitable to their condition as a laboring, landless, and homeless class; that said election shall be held on the 28th of March, 1864, at all the usual places of the State, or all such as voters may attend for that purpose, that the voters attending at eight o'clock in the morning of said day may choose judges and clerks of election for such purpose; that all persons qualified by said constitution and laws, and taking the oath presented in the President's proclamation of December 8, 1863, either before or at the election, and none others, may be voters; that each set of judges and clerks may make returns directly to you on or before the —th day of —— next; that in all other respects said election may be conducted according to said constitution and laws: that on receipt of said returns, when five thousand four hundred and six votes shall have been cast, you can receive said votes, and ascertain all who shall thereby appear to have been elected; that on the —th day of ——— next, all persons so appearing to have been elected, who shall appear before you at Little Rock, and take the oath, to be by you severally administered, to support the Constitution of the United States and said modified Constitution of the State of Arkansas, may be declared by you qualified and empowered to enter immediately upon the duties of the offices to which they shall have been respectively elected.
Various citizens of Arkansas are asking me to hold an election in the state to choose a Governor. They request that it be understood that, starting from this election, the constitution and laws of the state, as they were before the rebellion, are fully in effect, except that the constitution is amended to state that there will be no slavery or involuntary servitude, except as punishment for crimes for which a person has been duly convicted. The General Assembly may establish provisions for the freed people that acknowledge and confirm their permanent freedom, and provide for their education, in a way that may still be viewed as a temporary arrangement appropriate for their situation as a laboring, landless, and homeless group. This election is set for March 28, 1864, at all the usual polling places in the state, or wherever voters choose to gather for this purpose. Voters arriving at eight o'clock in the morning of that day may select judges and clerks for the election. Only individuals who meet the qualifications set by the constitution and laws, and who take the oath outlined in the President's proclamation from December 8, 1863, either prior to or during the election, will be allowed to vote. Each group of judges and clerks will submit their returns directly to you on or before the —th day of — next; and in all other respects, the election will be conducted according to the constitution and laws. Upon receiving these returns, once five thousand four hundred and six votes have been cast, you can accept the votes and determine who has been elected. On the —th day of ——— next, all individuals who appear to have been elected, and who come before you in Little Rock to take the oath you will administer to support the Constitution of the United States and the modified Constitution of Arkansas, will be declared by you qualified to immediately assume the responsibilities of the offices to which they were elected.
You will please order an election to take place on the 28th of March, 1864, and returns to be made in fifteen days thereafter.
You are requested to schedule an election for March 28, 1864, with results to be submitted fifteen days after.
MESSAGE TO CONGRESS, JANUARY 20, 1864
GENTLEMEN OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
In accordance with a letter addressed by the Secretary of State, with my approval, to the Hon. Joseph A. Wright, of Indiana, that patriotic and distinguished gentleman repaired to Europe and attended the International Agricultural Exhibition, held at Hamburg last year, and has since his return made a report to me, which, it is believed, can not fail to be of general interest, and especially so to the agricultural community. I transmit for your consideration copies of the letters and report. While it appears by the letter that no reimbursement of expenses or compensation was promised him, I submit whether reasonable allowance should not be made him for them.
Following a letter from the Secretary of State, which I approved, the honorable Joseph A. Wright from Indiana traveled to Europe to attend last year's International Agricultural Exhibition in Hamburg. Since returning, he has filed a report with me that is expected to interest many people, especially those in the agricultural sector. I’m sending you copies of the letters and the report for your review. Although the letter indicates that he was not promised reimbursement for his expenses or compensation, I suggest we consider making a reasonable allowance for them.
ORDER APPROVING TRADE REGULATIONS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 26, 1864.
I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States having seen and considered the additional regulations of trade prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, and numbered LI, LII, LIII, LIV, LV, and LVI, do hereby approve the same; and I further declare and order that all property brought in for sale, in good faith, and actually sold in pursuance of said Regulations LII, LIII, LIV, LV, and LVI, after the same shall have taken effect and come in force as provided in Regulation LVI, shall be exempt from confiscation or forfeiture to the United States.
I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, have reviewed the additional trade regulations set by the Secretary of the Treasury, numbered LI, LII, LIII, LIV, LV, and LVI. I hereby approve them. I also declare and order that any property brought in for sale, in good faith, and actually sold according to Regulations LII, LIII, LIV, LV, and LVI, after they take effect as stated in Regulation LVI, will be exempt from confiscation or forfeiture by the United States.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL FOSTER.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., January 27, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL FOSTER, Knoxville, Tenn.:
MAJOR-GENERAL FOSTER, Knoxville, TN:
Is a supposed correspondence between General Longstreet and yourself about the amnesty proclamation, which is now in the newspapers, genuine?
Is the supposed correspondence between General Longstreet and you about the amnesty proclamation, which is now in the newspapers, real?
TELEGRAM TO E. STANLEY.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 28, 1864
HON. EDWARD STANLEY, San Francisco, Cal.:
HON. EDWARD STANLEY, San Francisco, CA:
Yours of yesterday received. We have rumors similar to the dispatch received by you, but nothing very definite from North Carolina. Knowing Mr. Stanley to be an able man, and not doubting that he is a patriot, I should be glad for him to be with his old acquaintances south of Virginia, but I am unable to suggest anything definite upon the subject.
Your letter from yesterday was received. We have heard rumors similar to what you received, but nothing very specific from North Carolina. Knowing Mr. Stanley is a capable person and confident in his patriotism, I would be happy for him to be with his old friends south of Virginia, but I can't suggest anything concrete on the matter.
TO GENERAL H. W. HALLECK.
EXECUTIVE MANSION
WASHINGTON, January 28, 1864.
WASHINGTON, January 28, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL HALLECK:
MAJOR-GENERAL HALLECK:
Some citizens of Missouri, vicinity of Kansas City, are apprehensive that there is special danger of renewed troubles in that neighborhood, and thence on the route toward New Mexico. I am not impressed that the danger is very great or imminent, but I will thank you to give Generals Rosecrans and Curtis, respectively, such orders as may turn their attention thereto and prevent as far as possible the apprehended disturbance.
Some residents of Missouri, near Kansas City, are worried that there might be a chance of renewed problems in that area, which could affect the route to New Mexico. I don't believe the danger is very significant or immediate, but I would appreciate it if you could give Generals Rosecrans and Curtis the necessary orders to pay attention to this issue and prevent any potential disturbances as much as possible.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL SICKLES.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 29, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL SICKLES, New York:
MAJOR-GENERAL SICKLES, New York:
Could you, without it being inconvenient or disagreeable to yourself, immediately take a trip to Arkansas for me?
Could you, without it being a hassle or uncomfortable for you, go on a trip to Arkansas for me right away?
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., January 31, 1864.
GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE, Frankfort, Ky.:
GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE, Frankfort, KY:
General Boyle's resignation is accepted, so that your Excellency can give him the appointment proposed.
General Boyle's resignation has been accepted, allowing your Excellency to offer him the proposed appointment.
COLONIZATION EXPERIMENT
ORDER TO SECRETARY STANTON.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, February 1, 1864
White House, February 1, 1864
HON. EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
HON. EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
SIR:-You are directed to have a transport (either a steam or sailing vessel, as may be deemed proper by the Quartermaster-General) sent to the colored colony established by the United States at the island of Vache, on the coast of San Domingo, to bring back to this country such of the colonists there as desire to return. You will have the transport furnished with suitable supplies for that purpose, and detail an officer of the Quartermaster's Department, who, under special instructions to be given, shall have charge of the business. The colonists will be brought to Washington, unless otherwise hereafter directed, and be employed and provided for at the camps for colored persons around that city. Those only will be brought from the island who desire to return, and their effects will be brought with them.
SIR: You are instructed to arrange for a transport (either a steamship or sailing vessel, as determined appropriate by the Quartermaster-General) to be sent to the colored colony established by the United States on the island of Vache, off the coast of San Domingo, to bring back any colonists who wish to return to this country. Please ensure the transport is stocked with the necessary supplies for this purpose, and assign an officer from the Quartermaster's Department, who will receive specific instructions, to oversee this operation. The colonists will be brought to Washington, unless directed otherwise later, and will be supported and housed at the camps for colored individuals around that city. Only those who wish to return will be transported from the island, and their belongings will be taken with them.
ORDER FOR A DRAFT OF FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND MEN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, February 1, 1864.
Ordered, That a draft of five hundred thousand (500,000) men, to serve for three years or during the war, be made on the tenth (10th) day of March next, for the military service of the United States, crediting and deducting therefrom so many as may have been enlisted or drafted into the service prior to the first (1st) day of March, and not before credited.
Ordered, That a draft of five hundred thousand (500,000) men, to serve for three years or for the duration of the war, be conducted on the tenth (10th) day of March next, for the military service of the United States, crediting and subtracting those who may have enlisted or been drafted into the service before the first (1st) day of March, and not previously credited.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR YATES.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 3, 1864.
GOVERNOR YATES, Springfield, Ill.:
GOVERNOR YATES, Springfield, IL:
The United States Government lot in Springfield can be used for a soldiers' home, with the understanding that the Government does not incur any expense in the case.
The U.S. Government lot in Springfield can be used for a veterans' home, as long as the Government doesn’t have to cover any costs.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR MURPHY.
WASHINGTON, February 6, 1864.
GOVERNOR J. MURPHY:
GOVERNOR J. MURPHY:
My order to General Steele about an election was made in ignorance of the action your convention had taken or would take. A subsequent letter directs General Steele to aid you on your own plan, and not to thwart or hinder you. Show this to him.
My order to General Steele regarding an election was issued without knowing what actions your convention had taken or was planning to take. A later letter instructs General Steele to support you with your own plan and not to obstruct or interfere with you. Please show this to him.
THE STORY OF THE EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION
TOLD BY THE PRESIDENT, TO THE ARTIST F. B. CARPENTER,
FEBRUARY 6, 1864.
FEBRUARY 6, 1864.
"It had got to be," said Mr. Lincoln, "midsummer, 1862. Things had gone on from bad to worse, until I felt that we had reached the end of our rope on the plan of operations we had been pursuing; that we had about played our last card, and must change our tactics, or lose the game. I now determined upon the adoption of the emancipation policy; and without consultation with, or the knowledge of, the Cabinet, I prepared the original draft of the proclamation, and, after much anxious thought, called a Cabinet meeting upon the subject. This was the last of July or the first part of the month of August, 1862. [The exact date was July 22, 1862.]... All were present excepting Mr. Blair, the Postmaster-General, who was absent at the opening of the discussion, but came in subsequently. I said to the Cabinet that I had resolved upon this step, and had not called them together to ask their advice, but to lay the subject-matter of a proclamation before them, suggestions as to which would be in order after they had heard it read. Mr. Lovejoy was in error when he informed you that it excited no comment excepting on the part of Secretary Seward. Various suggestions were offered. Secretary Chase wished the language stronger in reference to the arming of the blacks.
"It had to be," said Mr. Lincoln, "the middle of summer, 1862. Things had gotten worse and worse until I felt we had reached the end of our rope with the plan of operations we were following; that we had nearly played our last card and needed to change our tactics, or we would lose the game. I then decided to adopt the emancipation policy; and without consulting or informing the Cabinet, I prepared the original draft of the proclamation. After much thought, I called a Cabinet meeting on the subject. This was either the last of July or the beginning of August, 1862. [The exact date was July 22, 1862.]... Everyone was there except Mr. Blair, the Postmaster-General, who was absent at the beginning of the discussion but joined in later. I told the Cabinet that I had made this decision and hadn't called them together to ask for their advice, but to present the subject of a proclamation to them, and suggestions would be welcome after they had heard it read. Mr. Lovejoy was mistaken when he told you that it didn’t spark any comments except from Secretary Seward. Several suggestions were made. Secretary Chase wanted the language to be stronger regarding the arming of the blacks."
"Mr. Blair, after he came in, deprecated the policy on the ground that it would cost the administration the fall elections. Nothing, however, was offered that I had not already fully anticipated and settled in my mind, until Secretary Seward spoke. He said in substance, 'Mr. President, I approve of the proclamation, but I question the expediency of its issue at this juncture. The depression of the public mind, consequent upon our repeated reverses, is so great that I fear the effect of so important a step. It may be viewed as the last measure of an exhausted government, a cry for help; the government stretching forth its hands to Ethiopia, instead of Ethiopia stretching forth her hands to the government.' His idea," said the President, "was that it would be considered our last shriek on the retreat." [This was his precise expression.] 'Now,' continued Mr. Seward, 'while I approve the measure, I suggest, sir, that you postpone its issue until you can give it to the country supported by military success, instead of issuing it, as would be the case now, upon the greatest disasters of the war.' Mr. Lincoln continued "The wisdom of the view of the Secretary of State struck me with very great force. It was an aspect of the case that, in all my thought upon the subject, I had entirely overlooked. The result was that I put the draft of the proclamation aside, as you do your sketch for a picture, waiting for a victory.
"After Mr. Blair came in, he criticized the policy, arguing that it would cost the administration the fall elections. However, nothing he said was new to me; I had already considered and made up my mind about it all, until Secretary Seward spoke. He essentially said, 'Mr. President, I support the proclamation, but I question whether it’s wise to issue it right now. The public is feeling so down after our repeated losses that I worry about the impact of such an important step. It might be seen as a last-ditch effort from a weary government, a cry for help; the government reaching out to Ethiopia, instead of Ethiopia reaching out to the government.' His point," the President noted, "was that it would be seen as our last gasp in retreat." [This was his exact phrasing.] 'Now,' Seward continued, 'while I do support the measure, I suggest, sir, that you hold off on issuing it until you can present it to the country backed by military success, rather than issuing it now after our biggest disasters of the war.' Mr. Lincoln said, "The wisdom in the Secretary of State's perspective struck me deeply. It was an angle I had completely overlooked in all my thinking on the matter. As a result, I set aside the draft of the proclamation, similar to how one puts aside a sketch for a painting, waiting for a victory."
"From time to time I added or changed a line, touching it up here and there, anxiously watching the process of events. Well, the next news we had was of Pope's disaster at Bull Run. Things looked darker than ever. Finally came the week of the battle of Antietam. I determined to wait no longer. The news came, I think, on Wednesday, that the advantage was on our side. I was then staying at the Soldiers' Home [three miles out of Washington]. Here I finished writing the second draft of the preliminary proclamation; came up on Saturday; called the Cabinet together to hear it, and it was published on the following Monday."
"Every now and then, I would add or change a line, making adjustments here and there, nervously watching how things unfolded. Then we got the news of Pope's defeat at Bull Run. It felt darker than ever. Finally, the week of the battle of Antietam arrived. I decided I couldn’t wait any longer. The news came, I think, on Wednesday, that we had the advantage. I was staying at the Soldiers' Home [three miles outside of Washington]. There, I finished the second draft of the preliminary proclamation; I came back on Saturday, gathered the Cabinet to present it, and it was published the following Monday."
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL SEDGWICK.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 11, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL SEDGWICK, Army of Potomac:
MAJOR-GENERAL SEDGWICK, Army of the Potomac:
Unless there be some strong reason to the contrary, please send General Kilpatrick to us here, for two or three days.
Unless there's a strong reason not to, please send General Kilpatrick to us here for two or three days.
TELEGRAM TO HORACE MAYNARD.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 13, 1864.
HON. HORACE MAYNARD, Nashville, Tenn.:
Hon. Horace Maynard, Nashville, TN:
Your letter of [the] second received. Of course Governor Johnson will proceed with reorganization as the exigencies of the case appear to him to require. I do not apprehend he will think it necessary to deviate from my views to any ruinous extent. On one hasty reading I see no such deviation in his program, which you send.
Your letter from the second arrived. Of course, Governor Johnson will move forward with the reorganization as he sees necessary. I don't think he’ll feel the need to stray from my views in any drastic way. After a quick read, I don’t see any significant departure from his plan that you sent.
TO W. M. FISHBACK.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, February 17, 1864.
WILLIAM M. FISHBACK, Little Rock, Arkansas:
WILLIAM M. FISHBACK, Little Rock, Arkansas:
When I fixed a plan for an election in Arkansas I did it in ignorance that your convention was doing the same work. Since I learned the latter fact I have been constantly trying to yield my plan to them. I have sent two letters to General Steele, and three or four despatches to you and others, saying that he, General Steele, must be master, but that it will probably be best for him to merely help the convention on its own plan. Some single mind must be master, else there will be no agreement in anything, and General Steele, commanding the military and being on the ground, is the best man to be that master. Even now citizens are telegraphing me to postpone the election to a later day than either that fixed by the convention or by me. This discord must be silenced.
When I made a plan for an election in Arkansas, I was unaware that your convention was working on the same thing. Since I found out, I've been trying to adjust my plan to fit with theirs. I've sent two letters to General Steele and three or four messages to you and others, stating that General Steele should take charge, but it might be best for him to just assist the convention with its own plan. There needs to be a clear leader; otherwise, we won’t reach any agreements, and General Steele, who is in command of the military and on-site, is the best person for that role. Even now, citizens are messaging me to postpone the election to a date later than what the convention or I have decided. We need to resolve this disagreement.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL STEELE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 17, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL STEELE, Little Rock, Arkansas:
MAJOR-GENERAL STEELE, Little Rock, AR:
The day fixed by the convention for the election is probably the best, but you on the ground, and in consultation with gentlemen there, are to decide. I should have fixed no day for an election, presented no plan for reconstruction, had I known the convention was doing the same things. It is probably best that you merely assist the convention on their own plan, as to election day and all other matters I have already written and telegraphed this half a dozen times.
The day set by the convention for the election is likely the best option, but you on the ground, in consultation with local leaders, should make the final decision. I wouldn’t have set an election date or proposed a reconstruction plan if I had known the convention was working on the same issues. It’s probably best for you to just help the convention with their own plan regarding election day and all the other matters I've already mentioned and communicated about multiple times.
TELEGRAM TO A. ROBINSON.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 18, 1864.
A. ROBINSON, Leroy, N. Y.:
A. ROBINSON, Leroy, NY:
The law only obliges us to keep accounts with States, or at most Congressional Districts, and it would overwhelm us to attempt in counties, cities and towns. Nevertheless we do what we can to oblige in particular cases. In this view I send your dispatch to the Provost-Marshal General, asking him to do the best he can for you.
The law only requires us to keep records with States or, at most, Congressional Districts, and it would be too much for us to try to do this for counties, cities, and towns. Still, we do what we can to help in specific cases. With that in mind, I'm sending your message to the Provost-Marshal General, asking him to do his best for you.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING BLOCKADE, FEBRUARY 18, 1864.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas, by my proclamation of the nineteenth of April, one thousand eight hundred and sixty-one, the ports of the States of South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas were, for reasons therein set forth, placed under blockade; and whereas, the port of Brownsville, in the district of Brazos Santiago, in the State of Texas, has since been blockaded, but as the blockade of said port may now be safely relaxed with advantage to the interests of commerce:
Whereas, by my announcement on April 19, 1861, the ports of South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas were, for the reasons stated, placed under blockade; and whereas, the port of Brownsville, in the district of Brazos Santiago, Texas, has since been blockaded, but the blockade of this port can now be safely lifted to benefit commercial interests:
Now, therefore, be it known that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, pursuant to the authority in me vested by the fifth section of the act of Congress approved on the 13th of July, 1861, entitled "An act further to provide for the collection of duties on imports, and for other purposes," do hereby declare that the blockade of the said port of Brownsville shall so far cease and determine from and after this date, that commercial intercourse with said port, except as to persons, things, and information hereinafter specified, may, from this date, be carried on, subject to the laws of the United States, to the regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, and, until the rebellion shall have been suppressed, to such orders as may be promulgated by the general commanding the department, or by an officer duly authorized by him and commanding at said port. This proclamation does not authorize or allow the shipment or conveyance of persons in, or intending to enter, the service of the insurgents, or of things or information intended for their use, or for their aid or comfort, nor, except upon the permission of the Secretary of War, or of some officer duly authorized by him, of the following prohibited articles, namely: cannon, mortars, firearms, pistols, bombs, grenades, powder, saltpeter, sulphur, balls, bullets, pikes, swords, boarding-caps (always excepting the quantity of the said articles which may be necessary for the defense of the ship and those who compose the crew), saddles, bridles, cartridge-bag material, percussion and other caps, clothing adapted for uniforms; sail-cloth of all kinds, hemp and cordage, intoxicating drinks other than beer and light native wines.
Now, therefore, let it be known that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, acting under the authority given to me by the fifth section of the act of Congress approved on July 13, 1861, titled "An act further to provide for the collection of duties on imports, and for other purposes," declare that the blockade of the port of Brownsville will cease and end as of this date. From now on, commercial trade with that port, except for specific persons, items, and information detailed below, may continue, subject to U.S. laws, regulations set by the Secretary of the Treasury, and until the rebellion is suppressed, any orders issued by the general in charge of the department or an officer authorized by him who is in command at that port. This proclamation does not permit or allow the transport of individuals entering or planning to join the insurgents, or items and information intended for their benefit or assistance, nor, unless allowed by the Secretary of War or an authorized officer, the following prohibited items: cannons, mortars, firearms, pistols, bombs, grenades, gunpowder, saltpeter, sulfur, balls, bullets, pikes, swords, boarding axes (except for the amount necessary for the defense of the ship and its crew), saddles, bridles, materials for cartridge bags, percussion and other caps, clothing suitable for uniforms; all types of sailcloth, hemp, and rope, and alcoholic beverages other than beer and light native wines.
To vessels clearing from foreign ports and destined to the port of Brownsville, opened by this proclamation, licenses will be granted by consuls of the United States upon satisfactory evidence that the vessel so licensed will convey no persons, property, or information excepted or prohibited above, either to or from the said port; which licenses shall be exhibited to the collector of said port immediately on arrival, and, if required, to any officer in charge of the blockade, and on leaving said port every vessel will be required to have a clearance from the collector of the customs, according to law, showing no violation of the conditions of the license. Any violations of said conditions will involve the forfeiture and condemnation of the vessel and cargo, and the exclusion of all parties concerned from any further privilege of entering the United States during the war for any purpose whatever.
To ships coming from foreign ports and headed to the port of Brownsville, which is now open as stated in this proclamation, licenses will be issued by U.S. consuls upon proof that the licensed ship will not transport any persons, property, or information that is restricted or prohibited, either to or from that port. These licenses must be shown to the collector at that port immediately upon arrival and, if requested, to any officer overseeing the blockade. Before leaving the port, every ship must obtain a clearance from the customs collector, in accordance with the law, indicating that there have been no violations of the license conditions. Any breach of these conditions will result in the seizure of the ship and cargo, and those involved will be barred from entering the United States for any purpose during the war.
In all respects, except as herein specified, the existing blockade remains in full force and effect as hitherto established and maintained, nor is it relaxed by this proclamation except in regard to the port to which relaxation is or has been expressly applied.
In every way, except for what is specifically stated here, the current blockade remains fully in place as it has been established and maintained. This proclamation does not loosen it, except for the port where the relaxation is specifically mentioned.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed. Done at the city of Washington, this eighteenth day of February, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-four, and of the independence of the United States the eighty-eighth.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and put the seal of the United States here. Done in the city of Washington, on the eighteenth day of February, in the year of our Lord 1864, and the eighty-eighth year of the independence of the United States.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By President WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
TELEGRAM TO COMMANDER BLAKE.
EXECUTIVE, MANSION, February 19, 1864.
COMMANDER GEORGE S. BLAKE, Commandant Naval Academy, Newport, R. I.:
COMMANDER GEORGE S. BLAKE, Commandant Naval Academy, Newport, R. I.:
I desire the case of Midshipman C. Lyon re-examined and if not clearly inconsistent I shall be much obliged to have the recommendation changed.
I want the case of Midshipman C. Lyon to be looked at again, and if it’s not clearly inconsistent, I would really appreciate it if the recommendation could be changed.
TELEGRAM FROM WARREN JORDAN.
NASHVILLE, February 20, 1864.
HON. W. H. SEWARD, Secretary of State, Washington, D.C.:
HON. W. H. SEWARD, Secretary of State, Washington, D.C.:
In county and State elections, must citizens of Tennessee take the oath prescribed by Governor Johnson, or will the President's oath of amnesty entitle them to vote? I have been appointed to hold the March election in Cheatham County, and wish to act understandingly.
In county and state elections, do citizens of Tennessee have to take the oath set by Governor Johnson, or does the President's amnesty oath allow them to vote? I've been assigned to oversee the March election in Cheatham County and want to make informed decisions.
WARREN JORDAN.
WARREN JORDAN.
WASHINGTON, February 20, 1864.
WASHINGTON, February 20, 1864.
WARREN JORDAN, NASHVILLE:
WARREN JORDAN, NASHVILLE:
In county elections you had better stand by Governor Johnson's plan; otherwise you will have conflict and confusion. I have seen his plan.
In county elections, you should definitely support Governor Johnson's plan; otherwise, you'll end up with conflict and confusion. I've seen his plan.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL ROSECRANS.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., February 22, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL ROSECRANS, Saint LOUIS, MO.:
MAJOR-GENERAL ROSECRANS, St. Louis, MO.:
Colonel Sanderson will be ordered to you to-day, a mere omission that it was not done before. The other questions in your despatch I am not yet prepared to answer.
Colonel Sanderson will be sent to you today, it was just an oversight that it wasn’t done earlier. I’m not ready to answer the other questions in your message yet.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL STEELE.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., February 22, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL STEELE, Little Rock, Ark.:
MAJOR-GENERAL STEELE, Little Rock, AR:
Yours of yesterday received. Your conference with citizens approved. Let the election be on the 14th of March as they agreed.
Your message from yesterday arrived. Your discussion with the citizens is approved. Let the election be on March 14th, as they agreed.
TO GENERAL F. STEELE.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, February 25, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL STEELE, Little Rock, Arkansas:
MAJOR-GENERAL STEELE, Little Rock, AR:
General Sickles is not going to Arkansas. He probably will make a tour down the Mississippi and home by the gulf and ocean, but he will not meddle in your affairs.
General Sickles is not headed to Arkansas. He’ll likely take a trip down the Mississippi and return home by way of the Gulf and the ocean, but he won’t get involved in your matters.
At one time I did intend to have him call on you and explain more fully than I could do by letter or telegraph, so as to avoid a difficulty coming of my having made a plan here, while the convention made one there, for reorganizing Arkansas; but even his doing that has been given up for more than two weeks. Please show this to Governor Murphy to save me telegraphing him.
At one point, I planned for him to reach out to you and provide a more detailed explanation than I could through a letter or a telegram. This was to prevent any issues arising from my planning something here while the convention was working on something there regarding the reorganization of Arkansas. However, even that has been set aside for more than two weeks. Please show this to Governor Murphy to avoid me sending him a telegram.
DESERTERS DEATH SENTENCES REMITTED
GENERAL ORDERS, NO.76.
WAR DEPARTMENT, ADJUTANT-GENERALS OFFICE,
DEFENSE DEPARTMENT, ADJUTANT GENERAL'S OFFICE,
WASHINGTON, February 26, 1864.
WASHINGTON, February 26, 1864.
Sentence of Deserters.
Sentence for Deserters.
The President directs that the sentences of all deserters who have been condemned by court-martial to death, and that have not been otherwise acted upon by him, be mitigated to imprisonment during the war at the Dry Tortugas, Florida, where they will be sent under suitable guards by orders from army commanders.
The President instructs that the death sentences of all deserters who have been sentenced by court-martial and have not had any further actions taken on them shall be changed to imprisonment for the duration of the war at the Dry Tortugas in Florida. They will be transported there under appropriate guards as directed by army commanders.
The commanding generals, who have power to act on proceedings of courts-martial in such cases, are authorized in special cases to restore to duty deserters under sentence, when in their judgment the service will be thereby benefited.
The commanding generals, who have the authority to act on the decisions of military courts in these situations, are allowed in certain cases to reinstate deserters who are under sentence if they believe it will benefit the service.
Copies of all orders issued under the foregoing instructions will be immediately forwarded to the Adjutant-General and to the Judge-Advocate General.
Copies of all orders issued under the above instructions will be immediately sent to the Adjutant-General and to the Judge Advocate General.
By order of the Secretary of War: B. D. TOWNSEND, Assistant Adjutant-General
By order of the Secretary of War: B. D. TOWNSEND, Assistant Adjutant-General
FEMALE SPY
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BUTLER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 26, 1864
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 26, 1864
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort. Monroe, Va.:
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, VA:
I cannot remember at whose request it was that I gave the pass to Mrs. Bulky. Of course detain her, if the evidence of her being a spy is strong against her.
I can't recall who asked me to give the pass to Mrs. Bulky. Of course, hold her if there’s solid evidence that she’s a spy.
TO W. JAYNE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 26, 1864.
HON. W. JAYNE.
Hon. W. Jayne.
DEAR SIR—I dislike to make changes in office so long as they can be avoided. It multiplies my embarrassments immensely. I dislike two appointments when one will do. Send me the name of some man not the present marshal, and I will nominate him to be Provost-Marshal for Dakota.
DEAR SIR—I really don’t like making changes in the office if I can help it. It just adds to my problems a lot. I prefer to have one appointment instead of two. Please send me the name of someone who isn't the current marshal, and I’ll nominate him to be Provost-Marshal for Dakota.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TO E. H. EAST.
WASHINGTON, February 27, 1864.
HON. E. H: EAST, Secretary of State, Nashville, Tennessee
HON. E. H. EAST, Secretary of State, Nashville, Tennessee
Your telegram of the twenty-sixth instant asking for a copy of my despatch to Warren Jordan, Esq., at Nashville Press office, has just been referred to me by Governor Johnson. In my reply to Mr. Jordan, which was brief and hurried, I intended to say that in the county and State elections of Tennessee, the oath prescribed in the proclamation of Governor Johnson on the twenty-sixth of January, 1864, ordering an election in Tennessee on the first Saturday in March next, is entirely satisfactory to me as a test of loyalty of all persons proposing or offering to vote in said elections; and coming from him would better be observed and followed. There is no conflict between the oath of amnesty in my proclamation of eighth December, 1863, and that prescribed by Governor Johnson in his proclamation of the twenty-sixth ultimo.
Your telegram from the twenty-sixth of this month asking for a copy of my message to Warren Jordan, Esq., at the Nashville Press office has just been forwarded to me by Governor Johnson. In my quick response to Mr. Jordan, I meant to convey that the oath outlined in Governor Johnson's proclamation from January 26, 1864, which calls for an election in Tennessee on the first Saturday of March, is completely acceptable to me as a measure of loyalty for everyone wishing to vote in those elections; and since it comes from him, it should be respected and followed. There's no conflict between the loyalty oath in my proclamation from December 8, 1863, and the one specified by Governor Johnson in his proclamation from the twenty-sixth of last month.
No person who has taken the oath of amnesty of eighth December, 1863, and obtained a pardon thereby, and who intends to observe the same in good faith, should have any objection to taking that prescribed by Governor Johnson as a test of loyalty.
No one who has taken the amnesty oath from December 8, 1863, received a pardon because of it, and intends to honestly uphold it should have any issues with taking the loyalty test required by Governor Johnson.
I have seen and examined Governor Johnson's proclamation, and am entirely satisfied with his plan, which is to restore the State government and place it under the control of citizens truly loyal to the Government of the United States.
I have looked over Governor Johnson's proclamation and I'm completely satisfied with his plan, which aims to restore the state government and put it under the control of citizens who are genuinely loyal to the Government of the United States.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
Please send above to Governor Johnson. A. L.
Please send the above to Governor Johnson. A. L.
TO SECRETARY STANTON.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 27, 1864
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR.
Secretary of Defense.
SIR:—You ask some instructions from me in relation to the Report of Special Commission constituted by an order of the War Department, dated December 5, 1863, "to revise the enrolment and quotas of the City and State of New York, and report whether there be any, and what, errors or irregularities therein, and what corrections, if any, should be made."
SIR:—You are requesting some guidance from me regarding the Report of the Special Commission established by an order from the War Department, dated December 5, 1863, "to review the enrollment and quotas of the City and State of New York, identify any errors or irregularities, and suggest any necessary corrections."
In the correspondence between the Governor of New York and myself last summer, I understood him to complain that the enrolments in several of the districts of that State had been neither accurately nor honestly made; and in view of this, I, for the draft then immediately ensuing, ordered an arbitrary reduction of the quotas in several of the districts wherein they seemed too large, and said: "After this drawing, these four districts, and also the seventeenth and twenty-ninth, shall be carefully re-enrolled, and, if you please, agents of yours may witness every step of the process." In a subsequent letter I believe some additional districts were put into the list of those to be re-enrolled. My idea was to do the work over according to the law, in presence of the complaining party, and thereby to correct anything which might be found amiss. The commission, whose work I am considering, seem to have proceeded upon a totally different idea. Not going forth to find men at all, they have proceeded altogether upon paper examinations and mental processes. One of their conclusions, as I understand, is that, as the law stands, and attempting to follow it, the enrolling officers could not have made the enrolments much more accurately than they did. The report on this point might be useful to Congress. The commission conclude that the quotas for the draft should be based upon entire population, and they proceed upon this basis to give a table for the State of New York, in which some districts are reduced and some increased. For the now ensuing draft, let the quotas stand as made by the enrolling officers, in the districts wherein this table requires them to be increased; and let them be reduced according to the table in the others: this to be no precedent for subsequent action. But, as I think this report may, on full consideration, be shown to have much that is valuable in it, I suggest that such consideration be given it, and that it be especially considered whether its suggestions can be conformed to without an alteration of the law.
In the correspondence between the Governor of New York and me last summer, I understood him to complain that the enrollments in several districts of that state had not been done accurately or honestly. In light of this, I ordered an arbitrary reduction of the quotas in several districts where they seemed too large for the upcoming draft and said: "After this drawing, these four districts, as well as the seventeenth and twenty-ninth, will be carefully re-enrolled, and, if you’d like, your agents can witness every step of the process." In a later letter, I believe I added more districts to the list for re-enrollment. My intention was to redo the work according to the law, in the presence of the complaining party, to correct any mistakes. The commission I’m discussing seems to have taken a completely different approach. Instead of going out to find men, they relied entirely on paperwork and mental processes. One of their conclusions, as I understand it, is that under the current law, and in trying to follow it, the enrolling officers couldn’t have made the enrollments much more accurately than they did. The report on this issue could be useful to Congress. The commission concludes that the quotas for the draft should be based on the total population, and they use this as a basis to provide a table for the State of New York, in which some districts are reduced and some increased. For the upcoming draft, let the quotas remain as determined by the enrolling officers in the districts where this table indicates they should be increased; and let them be reduced according to the table in the others: this should not set a precedent for future actions. However, since I believe this report may have valuable insights upon closer examination, I suggest it be carefully considered, particularly about whether its recommendations can be implemented without changing the law.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
A. LINCOLN. TELEGRAM TO GENERAL THOMAS.
A. LINCOLN. TEXT MESSAGE TO GENERAL THOMAS.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, February 28, 1864.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, February 28, 1864.
GENERAL L. THOMAS, Louisville, Kentucky:
GENERAL L. THOMAS, Louisville, KY:
I see your despatch of yesterday to the Secretary of War.
I see your message from yesterday to the Secretary of War.
I wish you would go to the Mississippi River at once, and take hold of and be master in the contraband and leasing business. You understand it better than any other man does. Mr. Miller's system doubtless is well intended, but from what I hear I fear that, if persisted in, it would fall dead within its own entangling details. Go there and be the judge. A Mr. Lewis will probably follow you with something from me on this subject, but do not wait for him. Nor is this to induce you to violate or neglect any military order from the General-in-Chief or Secretary of War.
I wish you'd head to the Mississippi River right away and take charge of the contraband and leasing business. You understand it better than anyone else. Mr. Miller's approach is probably well-meaning, but from what I've heard, I worry that if he keeps at it, it will completely fall apart due to its own complications. Go there and make your own judgment. A Mr. Lewis will likely catch up with you to discuss this further, but don’t wait for him. Also, this isn’t meant to persuade you to break or ignore any military orders from the General-in-Chief or Secretary of War.
TO SECRETARY CHASE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 29, 1864.
HON. SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY.
Secretary of the Treasury.
MY DEAR SIR:—I would have taken time to answer yours of the 22d inst. sooner, only that I did not suppose any evil could result from the delay, especially as, by a note, I promptly acknowledged the receipt of yours, and promised a fuller answer. Now, on consideration I find there is really very little to say. My knowledge of Mr. Pomeroy's letter having been made public came to me only the day you wrote; but I had, in spite of myself, known of its existence several days before. I have not yet read it, and I think I shall not. I was not shocked or surprised by the appearance of the letter, because I had had knowledge of Mr. Pomeroy's committee, and of secret issues which, I supposed, came from it, and of secret agents who, I supposed, were sent out by it for several weeks. I have known just as little a these things as my friends have allowed me to know. They bring the documents to me, but I do not read them; they tell me what they think fit to tell me, but I do not inquire for more.
MY DEAR SIR:—I would have replied to your letter from the 22nd sooner, but I didn’t think any harm would come from the delay, especially since I quickly acknowledged receiving your message and promised a more detailed response. Now that I think about it, there’s really not much to say. I only learned that Mr. Pomeroy's letter had become public on the day you wrote, but I had, despite myself, known about its existence for several days before that. I haven’t read it yet, and I don’t think I will. I wasn’t shocked or surprised by the letter’s release because I was aware of Mr. Pomeroy’s committee, the secret issues I assumed stemmed from it, and the secret agents I believed were sent out by it for several weeks. I have known about these matters only as much as my friends have chosen to share with me. They bring the documents to me, but I don’t read them; they tell me what they think I should know, but I don’t ask for more details.
I fully concur with you that neither of us can justly be held responsible for what our respective friends may do without our instigation or countenance and I assure you, as you have assured me, that no assault has been made upon you by my instigation, or with my countenance.
I completely agree with you that neither of us can be fairly blamed for what our friends might do without our prompting or approval, and I assure you, just as you have assured me, that I have not instigated or supported any attack against you.
Whether you shall remain at the head of the Treasury Department is a question which I will not allow myself to consider from any standpoint other than my judgment of the public service, and, in that view, I do not perceive occasion for a change.
Whether you will stay at the head of the Treasury Department is a question I won’t allow myself to think about from any perspective other than my assessment of public service, and from that standpoint, I don’t see a reason for a change.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TO GENERAL THOMAS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION WASHINGTON, March 1,1864.
GENERAL L. THOMAS:
GENERAL L. THOMAS:
This introduces Mr. Lewis, mentioned in my despatch sent you at Louisville some days ago. I have but little personal acquaintance with him; but he has the confidence of several members of Congress here who seem to know him well. He hopes to be useful, without charge to the government, in facilitating the introduction of the free-labor system on the Mississippi plantations. He is acquainted with, and has access to, many of the planters who wish to adopt the system. He will show you two letters of mine on this subject, one somewhat General, and the other relating to named persons; they are not different in principle. He will also show you some suggestions coming from some of the planters themselves. I desire that all I promise in these letters, so far as practicable, may be in good faith carried out, and that suggestions from the planters may be heard and adopted, so far as they may not contravene the principles stated, nor justice, nor fairness, to laborers. I do not herein intend to overrule your own mature judgment on any point.
This is to introduce Mr. Lewis, who I mentioned in my message sent to you at Louisville a few days ago. I don’t know him personally very well, but he has the trust of several members of Congress here who seem to know him well. He hopes to be helpful, at no cost to the government, in promoting the free-labor system on the Mississippi plantations. He knows many of the planters who want to adopt this system and can reach them. He will show you two letters of mine on this topic, one that is more general and the other concerning specific individuals; they don’t differ in principle. He’ll also present some suggestions from the planters themselves. I hope that everything I promise in these letters, as far as possible, will be carried out in good faith, and that the suggestions from the planters will be heard and considered, as long as they don’t contradict the stated principles, nor justice, nor fairness to the laborers. I don’t intend to undermine your own thoughtful judgment on any matter.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL STEELE.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., March 3, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL STEELE, Little Rock, Ark.:
MAJOR-GENERAL STEELE, Little Rock, AR:
Yours including address to people of Arkansas is received. I approve the address and thank you for it. Yours in relation to William M. Randolph also received. Let him take the oath of December 8, and go to work for the new constitution, and on your notifying me of it, I will immediately issue the special pardon for him.
I got your address to the people of Arkansas. I approve it and appreciate it. I also received your message about William M. Randolph. Have him take the oath on December 8, and start working on the new constitution. Once you let me know he’s done that, I’ll issue the special pardon for him right away.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BUTLER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 4,1864. MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, Va.:
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 4, 1864. MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, Va.:
Admiral Dahlgren is here, and of course is very anxious about his son. Please send me at once all you know or can learn of his fate.
Admiral Dahlgren is here, and he's obviously very worried about his son. Please send me everything you know or can find out about what happened to him right away.
ORDER IN REGARD TO THE EXPORTATION OF TOBACCO BELONGING TO THE FRENCH
GOVERNMENT. EXECUTIVE MANSION,
Government. Executive Residence,
WASHINGTON, March 7, 1864.
WASHINGTON, March 7, 1864.
Whereas, by an Executive order of the 10th of November last permission was given to export certain tobacco belonging to the French government from insurgent territory, which tobacco was supposed to have been purchased and paid for prior to the 4th day of March, 1861; but whereas it was subsequently ascertained that a part at least of the said tobacco had been purchased subsequently to that date, which fact made it necessary to suspend the carrying into effect of the said order; but whereas, pursuant to mutual explanations, a satisfactory understanding upon the subject has now been reached, it is directed that the order aforesaid may be carried into effect, it being understood that the quantity of French tobacco so to be exported shall not exceed seven thousand hogsheads, and that it is the same tobacco respecting the exportation of which application Was originally made by the French government.
Whereas, an Executive order on November 10th of last year allowed the export of certain tobacco owned by the French government from rebel territory, which tobacco was supposed to have been purchased and paid for before March 4, 1861; but since it was later discovered that at least some of this tobacco had been purchased after that date, it became necessary to pause the implementation of that order; however, following mutual discussions, a satisfactory agreement has now been reached on the matter, it is now directed that the aforementioned order may proceed, with the understanding that the amount of French tobacco to be exported will not exceed seven thousand hogsheads, and that it is the same tobacco for which the French government originally requested exportation.
TELEGRAM TO UNITED STATES MARSHAL, LOUISVILLE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 7, 1864.
U.S. MARSHAL, Louisville, Ky.:
U.S. Marshal, Louisville, KY:
Until further order suspend sale of property and further proceedings in cases of the United States against Dr. John B. English, and S. S. English, qt al., sureties for John L. Hill. Also same against same sureties for Thomas A. Ireland.
Until further notice, stop the sale of property and any further actions in the cases of the United States against Dr. John B. English and S. S. English, et al., sureties for John L. Hill. The same applies to the sureties for Thomas A. Ireland.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
MAJOR ECKERT: Please send the above dispatch. JNO. G. NICOLAY, Private Secretary
MAJOR ECKERT: Please send the dispatch above. JNO. G. NICOLAY, Private Secretary
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 9, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of Potomac:
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of the Potomac:
New York City votes ninety-five hundred majority for allowing soldiers to vote, and the rest of the State nearly all on the same side. Tell the soldiers.
New York City votes 9,500 in favor of allowing soldiers to vote, and the rest of the State is mostly on the same side. Let the soldiers know.
MESSAGE TO SENATE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, March 9, 1864.
TO THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
TO THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
In compliance with a resolution of the Senate of the 1st instant, respecting the points of commencement of the Union Pacific Railroad, on the one hundredth degree of west longitude, and of the branch road, from the western boundary of Iowa to the said one hundredth degree of longitude, I transmit the accompanying report from the Secretary of the Interior, containing the information called for.
In accordance with a Senate resolution from the 1st of this month regarding the starting points of the Union Pacific Railroad at the one hundredth degree of west longitude, and the branch line from the western border of Iowa to that same one hundredth degree, I am sending you the attached report from the Secretary of the Interior, which includes the requested information.
I deem it proper to add that on the 17th day of November last an Executive order was made upon this subject and delivered to the vice-president of the Union Pacific Railroad Company, which fixed the point on the western boundary of the State of Iowa from which the company should construct their branch road to the one hundredth degree of west longitude, and declared it to be within the limits of the township in Iowa opposite the town of Omaha, in Nebraska. Since then the company has represented to me that upon actual surveys made it has determined upon the precise point of departure of their said branch road from the Missouri River, and located the same as described in the accompanying report of the Secretary of the Interior, which point is within the limits designated in the order of November last; and inasmuch as that order is not of record in any of the Executive Departments, and the company having desired a more definite one, I have made the order of which a copy is herewith, and caused the same to be filed in the Department of the Interior.
I think it's important to mention that on November 17th, an Executive order was issued regarding this matter and was given to the vice-president of the Union Pacific Railroad Company. This order established the point on the western boundary of Iowa from which the company should build their branch road to the one hundredth degree of west longitude, and it stated that this point is within the limits of the township in Iowa across from the town of Omaha, Nebraska. Since then, the company has informed me that based on their actual surveys, they have identified the exact starting point of their branch road from the Missouri River, which is detailed in the accompanying report from the Secretary of the Interior. This point is within the limits specified in the November order; however, since that order is not on record in any Executive Departments, and the company wanted a more detailed one, I have issued the order of which a copy is attached, and I have made sure it is filed in the Department of the Interior.
ADDRESS TO GENERAL GRANT,
MARCH 9, 1864.
GENERAL GRANT:—The expression of the nation's approbation of what you have already done, and its reliance on you for what remains to do in the existing great struggle, is now presented with this commission constituting you Lieutenant-General of the Army of the United States.
GENERAL GRANT:—The nation's approval of your past accomplishments and its trust in you for what still needs to be done in this significant struggle is now reflected in this commission appointing you as Lieutenant-General of the Army of the United States.
With this high honor, devolves on you an additional responsibility. As the country herein trusts you, so, under God, it will sustain you. I scarcely need add, that with what I here speak for the country, goes my own hearty personal concurrence.
With this great honor comes an added responsibility. As the country places its trust in you, so, with God's help, it will support you. I hardly need to mention that what I say on behalf of the country is fully backed by my own sincere agreement.
GENERAL GRANT'S REPLY.
GENERAL GRANT'S RESPONSE.
Mr. PRESIDENT:—I accept this commission, with gratitude for the high honor conferred.
Mr. PRESIDENT:—I accept this role, grateful for the great honor given to me.
With the aid of the noble armies that have fought on so many fields for our common country, it will be my earnest endeavor not to disappoint your expectations.
With the support of the brave armies that have fought on so many battlefields for our shared country, I will do my best not to let you down.
I feel the full weight of the responsibilities now devolving on me, and I know that if they are met, it will be due to those armies; and above all, to the favor of that Providence which leads both nations and men.
I feel the full weight of the responsibilities that are now falling on me, and I know that if I meet them, it will be thanks to those armies; and most importantly, to the guidance of that Providence which directs both nations and people.
ORDER ASSIGNING U. S. GRANT COMMAND OF THE ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., March 10, 1864.
Under the authority of an act of Congress to revive the grade of lieutenant-General in the United States Army, approved February 29, 1864, Lieutenant-General Ulysses S. Grant, United States Army, is assigned to the command of the Armies of the United States.
Under the authority of an act of Congress to reinstate the rank of lieutenant general in the United States Army, approved February 29, 1864, Lieutenant General Ulysses S. Grant, United States Army, is appointed to command the Armies of the United States.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR MURPHY.
WASHINGTON, D. C., March 12, 1864.
GOVERNOR MURPHY, Little Rock, Arkansas:
GOVERNOR MURPHY, Little Rock, AR:
I am not appointing officers for Arkansas now, and I will try to remember your request. Do your best to get out the largest vote possible, and of course as much of it as possible on the right side.
I'm not appointing officials for Arkansas right now, but I'll try to keep your request in mind. Do your best to get the highest turnout possible, and make sure as much of it as you can is for the right side.
TO GENERAL HAHN. (Private.)
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 13, 1864
HON. MICHAEL HAHN.
HON. MICHAEL HAHN
MY DEAR SIR:—I congratulate you on having fixed your name in history as the first free-state governor of Louisiana. Now, you are about to have a convention, which among other things will probably define the elective franchise. I barely suggest for your private consideration, whether some of the colored people may not be let in,—as, for instance, the very intelligent, and especially those who have fought gallantly in our ranks. They would probably help, in some trying time to come, to keep the jewel of liberty within the family of freedom. But this is only a suggestion,—not to the public, but to you alone.
MY DEAR SIR:—I congratulate you on establishing your name in history as the first free-state governor of Louisiana. Now, you are about to hold a convention, which will likely define the right to vote. I would like to privately suggest that some of the colored people could be included—particularly those who are very intelligent, and especially those who have fought bravely alongside us. They could possibly help, during challenging times ahead, to safeguard the precious jewel of liberty within the family of freedom. But this is just a suggestion—meant for you alone, not for the public.
Yours truly,
Best regards,
CALL FOR TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND MEN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION WASHINGTON, MARCH 14, 1864.
In order to supply the force required to be drafted for the Navy and to provide an adequate reserve force for all contingencies, in addition to the five hundred thousand men called for February 1, 1864, a call is hereby made and a draft ordered for two hundred thousand men for the military service (Army, Navy, and Marine Corps) of the United States.
To meet the need for more recruits in the Navy and to ensure there’s a sufficient reserve force for any situation, in addition to the five hundred thousand men requested for February 1, 1864, we are now calling for and ordering a draft of two hundred thousand men for military service (Army, Navy, and Marine Corps) of the United States.
The proportional quotas for the different wards, towns, townships, precincts, or election districts, or counties, will be made known through the Provost Marshal-General's Bureau, and account will be taken of the credits and deficiencies on former quotas.
The proportional quotas for the different wards, towns, townships, precincts, election districts, or counties will be communicated through the Provost Marshal-General's Bureau, and the credits and deficiencies from previous quotas will be considered.
The 15th day of April, 1864, is designated as the time up to which the numbers required from each ward of a city, town, etc., may be raised by voluntary enlistment, and drafts will be made in each ward of a city, town, etc., which shall not have filled the quota assigned to it within the time designated for the number required to fill said quotas. The drafts will be commenced as soon after the 15th of April as practicable.
The 15th day of April, 1864, is set as the deadline for each ward of a city, town, etc., to meet the required numbers through voluntary enlistment. Drafts will be conducted in each ward of a city, town, etc., that has not filled its assigned quota by the designated time. The drafts will begin as soon as possible after April 15th.
The Government bounties as now paid continue until April I, 1864, at which time the additional bounties cease. On and after that date one hundred dollars bounty only will be paid, as provided by the act approved July 22, 1861.
The government bounties that are currently being paid will continue until April 1, 1864, at which point the additional bounties will end. Starting on that date, only a one hundred dollar bounty will be paid, as stated in the act approved on July 22, 1861.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
(Private.)
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 15, 1864
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 15, 1864
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, Nashville, Tenn.:
LT. GEN. GRANT, Nashville, TN:
General McPherson having been assigned to the command of a department, could not General Frank Blair, without difficulty or detriment to the service, be assigned to command the Corps he commanded a while last autumn?
General McPherson, having been assigned to lead a department, couldn't General Frank Blair, without trouble or harm to the service, be assigned to lead the Corps he commanded last autumn?
PASS FOR GENERAL D. E. SICKLES.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 15, 1864.
WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
To Whom It May Concern
Major-General Sickles is making a tour for me from here by way of Cairo, New Orleans, and returning by the gulf, and ocean, and all land and naval officers and, employees are directed to furnish reasonable transportation and other reasonable facilities to himself and personal staff not inconsistent with the public service.
Major-General Sickles is taking a trip for me from here through Cairo, New Orleans, and coming back via the Gulf and ocean. All land and naval officers and employees are instructed to provide reasonable transportation and other reasonable assistance to him and his personal staff, as long as it doesn't interfere with public service.
ORDER TO GOVERNOR HAHN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 15, 1864.
HIS EXCELLENCY MICHAEL HAHN, Governor of Louisiana
HIS EXCELLENCY MICHAEL HAHN, Governor of Louisiana
Until further order, you are hereby invested with the powers exercised hitherto by the military governor of Louisiana.
Until further notice, you are now granted the powers that have previously been held by the military governor of Louisiana.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
REMARKS AT A FAIR IN THE PATENT OFFICE,
WASHINGTON, MARCH 16, 1864.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN:
Ladies and gentlemen:
I appear to say but a word. This extraordinary war in which we are engaged falls heavily upon all classes of people but the most heavily upon the soldier. For it has been said, "All that a man hath will he give for his life;" and while all contribute of their substance, the soldier puts his life at stake, and often yields it up in his country's cause. The highest merit, then, is due to the soldier.
I seem to be saying just a word. This extraordinary war we're involved in affects all kinds of people, but it hits the soldier the hardest. It's been said, "A man will give everything he has for his life," and while everyone contributes what they can, the soldier risks his life and often sacrifices it for his country. Therefore, the highest honor belongs to the soldier.
In this extraordinary war, extraordinary developments have manifested themselves, such as have not been seen in former wars; and among these manifestations nothing has been more remarkable than these fairs for the relief of suffering soldiers and their families. And the chief agents of these fairs are the women of America.
In this incredible war, remarkable events have occurred that have never been seen in previous conflicts; and among these events, nothing stands out more than the fairs organized to help suffering soldiers and their families. The main organizers of these fairs are the women of America.
I am not accustomed to the use of language of eulogy: I have never studied the art of paying compliments to women; but I must say, that if all that has been said by orators and poets since the creation of the world in praise of women were applied to the women of America, it would not do them justice for their conduct during this war. I will close by saying, God bless the women of America.
I’m not used to giving praise: I’ve never learned how to compliment women properly. However, I have to say that if everything said by speakers and poets praising women throughout history were directed at American women, it still wouldn’t capture their true worth for how they’ve acted during this war. I’ll finish by saying, God bless the women of America.
REPLY TO A COMMITTEE FROM THE WORKINGMEN'S ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK,
MARCH 21, 1864.
GENTLEMEN OF THE COMMITTEE:
COMMITTEE MEMBERS:
The honorary membership in your association, as generously tendered, is gratefully accepted.
The honorary membership in your association, which you kindly offered, is sincerely accepted.
You comprehend, as your address shows, that the existing rebellion means more and tends to do more than the perpetuation of African slavery—that it is, in fact, a war upon the rights of all working people. Partly to show that this view has not escaped my attention, and partly that I cannot better express myself, I read a passage from the message to Congress in December, 1861:
You understand, as your address indicates, that the current rebellion signifies more and has broader implications than just the continuation of African slavery—that it is, in essence, a war against the rights of all working people. To show that I am aware of this perspective, and because I can't express it better, I will read a passage from the message to Congress in December, 1861:
"It continues to develop that the insurrection is largely, if not exclusively, a war upon the first principle of popular government, the rights of the people. Conclusive evidence of this is found in the most grave and maturely considered public documents, as well as in the General tone of the insurgents. In those documents we find the abridgment of the existing right of suffrage, and the denial to the people of all right to participate in the selection of public officers, except the legislature, boldly advocated, with labored argument to prove that large control of the people in government is the source of all political evil. Monarchy itself is sometimes hinted at as a possible refuge from the power of the people. In my present position I could scarcely be justified were I to omit raising a warning voice against this approach of returning despotism.
The situation has developed to show that the rebellion is mostly, if not entirely, a direct attack on the fundamental principle of popular government: the rights of the people. Clear evidence of this can be found in serious and well-thought-out public documents, as well as in the overall attitude of the insurgents. These documents advocate for restricting the current right to vote and deny the people any right to participate in choosing public officials, except for the legislature, and they make a convoluted argument claiming that significant public control in government is the root of all political problems. Monarchy is sometimes even suggested as a potential escape from the influence of the people. In my current position, I would hardly be justified if I did not raise a warning against this drift toward tyranny.
"It is not needed, nor fitting here, that a General argument should be made in favor of popular institutions; but there is one point, with its connections, not so hackneyed as most others, to which I ask a brief attention. It is the effort to place capital on an equal footing, if not above labor, in the structure of government. It is assumed that labor is available only in connection with capital; that nobody labors unless somebody else, owning capital, somehow by the use of it induces him to labor. This assumed, it is next considered whether it is best that capital shall hire laborers, and thus induce them to work by their own consent or buy them, and drive them to it without their consent. Having proceeded so it is naturally concluded that all laborers are either hired laborers, or what we call slaves. And, further, it is assumed that whoever is once a hired laborer, is fixed in that condition for life. Now there is no such relation between capital and labor as assumed, nor is there any such thing as a free man being fixed for life in the condition of a hired laborer. Both these assumptions are false, and all inferences from them are groundless.
It’s neither necessary nor appropriate to argue generally in favor of popular institutions here, but there is one point, which is less commonly discussed than most others, that I would like to briefly draw attention to. It’s the attempt to place capital on equal footing, if not above, labor within the government structure. It's taken for granted that labor is only valuable when connected to capital; that no one works unless someone else, who owns capital, somehow encourages them to do so by utilizing it. With that assumption in mind, the next question is whether it’s better for capital to hire workers and motivate them to work willingly or to buy them and compel them to work against their will. Following this reasoning, it’s naturally concluded that all workers are either hired laborers or what we refer to as slaves. Moreover, it’s assumed that once someone is a hired laborer, they are stuck in that role for life. However, there is no such relationship between capital and labor as assumed, nor can a free person be permanently confined to the status of a hired laborer. Both assumptions are incorrect, and all conclusions drawn from them are unfounded.
"Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration. Capital has its rights, which are as worthy of protection as any other rights. Nor is it denied that there is, and probably always will be, a relation between capital and labor, producing mutual benefits. The error is in assuming that the whole labor of a community exists within that relation. A few men own capital, and that few avoid labor themselves, and, with their capital, hire or buy another few to labor for them. A large majority belong to neither class—neither work for others, nor have others working for them. In most of the Southern States, a majority of the whole people, of all colors, are neither slaves nor masters; while in the Northern, a large majority are neither hirers nor hired. Men with their families, wives, sons, and daughters—work for themselves, on their farms, in their houses, and in their shops, taking the whole product to themselves, and asking no favors of capital on the one hand, nor of hired laborers or slaves on the other. It is not forgotten that a considerable number of persons mingle their own labor with capital; that is, they labor with their own hands, and also buy or hire others to labor for them, but this is only a mixed and not a distinct class. No principle stated is disturbed by the existence of this mixed class.
"Labor comes before and is independent of capital. Capital is just the result of labor and wouldn't exist if labor hadn't come first. Labor is superior to capital and deserves much more attention. Capital has its rights, which are just as important to protect as any other rights. It's also true that there is, and probably always will be, a relationship between capital and labor that provides mutual benefits. The mistake is in thinking that all labor in a community fits into that relationship. A small number of people own capital, and those few avoid labor themselves, hiring or buying a few others to work for them with their capital. A large majority don't belong to either group—they neither work for others nor have others working for them. In most Southern States, a majority of people of all colors are neither slaves nor masters; meanwhile, in the North, a large majority are neither employers nor employees. Individuals with their families—wives, sons, and daughters—work for themselves on their farms, in their homes, and in their shops, keeping all the profits and not relying on capital or hired laborers or slaves. It's also important to remember that a significant number of people combine their own labor with capital, meaning they do manual work while also hiring others to work for them, but this is just a mixed group, not a separate class. The principles mentioned remain unchanged by the existence of this mixed class."
"Again, as has already been said, there is not, of necessity, any such thing as the free hired laborer being fixed to that condition for life. Many independent men everywhere in these States, a few years back in their lives, were hired laborers. The prudent penniless beginner in the world labors for wages a while, saves a surplus with which to buy tools or land for himself, then labors on his own account another while, and at length hires another new beginner to help him. This is the just and generous and prosperous system which opens the way to all—gives hope to all, and consequent energy and progress, and improvement of condition to all. No men living are more worthy to be trusted than those who toil up from poverty—none less inclined to touch or take aught which they have not honestly earned. Let them beware of surrendering a political power they already possess, and which, if surrendered, will surely be used to close the door of advancement against such as they, and to fix new disabilities and burdens upon them, till all of liberty shall be lost."
"Again, as already mentioned, there’s no reason to think that a free hired worker has to stay in that position for life. Many independent people across these States were hired workers just a few years earlier in their lives. The careful, broke beginner in the world works for wages for a while, saves up to buy tools or land for themselves, then works on their own for a while longer, and eventually hires another new beginner to assist them. This is a fair, generous, and successful system that opens doors for everyone—gives hope to all, which leads to energy, progress, and improvement in living conditions for all. No one is more deserving of trust than those who have worked their way up from poverty—none are less likely to take or touch anything they haven't honestly earned. They should be careful not to give up the political power they already have, which, if surrendered, will certainly be used to shut down opportunities for people like them and impose new disabilities and burdens on them, until all freedom is lost."
The views then expressed remain unchanged, nor have I much to add. None are so deeply interested to resist the present rebellion as the working people. Let them beware of prejudices, working division and hostility among themselves. The most notable feature of a disturbance in your city last summer was the hanging of some working people by other working people. It should never be so. The strongest bond of human sympathy, outside of the family relation, should be one uniting all working people, of all nations, and tongues, and kindreds. Nor should this lead to a war upon property, or the owners of property. Property is the fruit of labor; property is desirable; is a positive good in the world. That some should be rich shows that others may become rich, and, hence, is just encouragement to industry and enterprise. Let not him who is houseless pull down the house of another, but let him labor diligently and build one for himself, thus by example assuring that his own shall be safe from violence when built.
The views expressed then haven't changed, and I don't have much more to add. No group is more invested in resisting the current rebellion than the working people. They should be cautious of biases, divisions, and hostility among themselves. A significant aspect of the disturbance in your city last summer was that some working people were hanged by other working people. That should never happen. The strongest bond of human connection, aside from family ties, should unite all working people, regardless of nationality, language, or background. This unity shouldn’t lead to war against property or property owners. Property comes from labor; it’s something we want and is a good thing in the world. The fact that some people are wealthy shows that others can also become wealthy, which provides encouragement for hard work and initiative. Those without homes shouldn't destroy someone else's house; instead, they should work hard to build one for themselves, ensuring that, by setting an example, their own home will be safe from violence once it's built.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BUTLER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 22, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, Va.:
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, VA:
Hon. W. R. Morrison says he has requested you by letter to effect a special exchange of Lieut. Col. A. F. Rogers, of Eightieth Illinois Volunteers, now in Libby Prison, and I shall be glad if you can effect it.
Hon. W. R. Morrison says he has asked you in a letter to arrange a special exchange for Lieut. Col. A. F. Rogers, of the Eightieth Illinois Volunteers, who is currently in Libby Prison, and I would appreciate it if you could make that happen.
CORRESPONDENCE WITH GENERAL C. SCHURZ.
( Private.)
WASHINGTON, March 13, 1864.
WASHINGTON, March 13, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL SCHURZ.
Major General Schurz.
MY DEAR SIR:—Yours of February 29 reached me only four days ago; but the delay was of little consequence, because I found, on feeling around, I could not invite you here without a difficulty which at least would be unpleasant, and perhaps would be detrimental to the public service. Allow me to suggest that if you wish to remain in the military service, it is very dangerous for you to get temporarily out of it; because, with a major-general once out, it is next to impossible for even the President to get him in again. With my appreciation of your ability and correct principle, of course I would be very glad to have your service for the country in the approaching political canvass; but I fear we cannot properly have it without separating you from the military.
MY DEAR SIR:—I received your letter from February 29 just four days ago; however, the delay didn't matter much, as I realized that I couldn’t invite you here without facing a challenge that would be uncomfortable at best and possibly harmful to the public service. I’d like to suggest that if you want to stay in the military, it’s quite risky to step away from it, even temporarily; because once a major-general is out, it’s nearly impossible for even the President to bring him back. I truly appreciate your skills and strong principles, and I would be very pleased to have your help for the country in the upcoming political campaign; but I’m afraid we can’t manage that without pulling you away from the military.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
PROCLAMATION ABOUT AMNESTY,
MARCH 26, 1864.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas, it has become necessary to define the cases in which insurgent enemies are entitled to the benefits of the Proclamation of the President of the United States, which was made on the 8th day of December, 1863, and the manner in which they shall proceed to avail themselves of these benefits; and whereas the objects of that Proclamation were to suppress the insurrection and to restore the authority of the United States; and whereas the amnesty therein proposed by the President was offered with reference to these objects alone:
Whereas, it has become necessary to clarify the situations in which rebel enemies can access the benefits of the Proclamation issued by the President of the United States on December 8, 1863, and the process they need to follow to take advantage of these benefits; and whereas the aims of that Proclamation were to put an end to the insurrection and restore the authority of the United States; and whereas the amnesty proposed by the President was offered specifically with these aims in mind:
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, do hereby proclaim and declare that the said Proclamation does not apply to the cases of persons who, at the time when they seek to obtain the benefits thereof by taking the oath thereby prescribed, are in military, naval, or civil confinement or custody, or under bonds, or on parole of the civil, military, or naval authorities, or agents of the United States, as prisoners of war, or persons detained for offences of any kind, either before or after conviction; and that on the contrary it does apply only to those persons who, being yet at large, and free from any arrest, confinement, or duress, shall voluntarily come forward and take the said oath, with the purpose of restoring peace, and establishing the national authority.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, do hereby proclaim and declare that this Proclamation does not apply to individuals who, at the time they seek to benefit from it by taking the required oath, are in military, naval, or civil confinement or custody, or under bonds, or on parole from the civil, military, or naval authorities, or agents of the United States, as prisoners of war, or individuals held for any offenses, whether before or after conviction; and that, on the contrary, it applies only to those individuals who, being free and not under arrest, confinement, or coercion, voluntarily come forward and take the required oath, with the intention of restoring peace and establishing national authority.
Persons excluded from the amnesty offered in the said Proclamation may apply to the President for clemency, like all other offenders, and their application will receive due consideration.
People who are not included in the amnesty provided in the mentioned Proclamation can apply to the President for clemency, just like any other offenders, and their applications will be given proper consideration.
I do further declare and proclaim that the oath presented in the aforesaid proclamation of the 8th of December, 1863, may be taken and subscribed before any commissioned officer, civil, military, or naval, in the service of the United States, or any civil or military officer of a State or Territory not in insurrection, who, by the laws thereof, may be qualified for administering oaths.
I further declare and announce that the oath mentioned in the proclamation dated December 8, 1863, can be taken and signed before any commissioned officer, whether civil, military, or naval, in the service of the United States, or any civil or military officer of a state or territory that is not in rebellion, who is qualified under their laws to administer oaths.
All officers who receive such oaths are hereby authorized to give certificates thereof to the persons respectively by whom they are made, and such officers are hereby required to transmit the original records of such oaths, at as early a day as may be convenient, to the Department of State, where they will be deposited, and remain in the archives of the Government.
All officers who take these oaths are authorized to provide certificates to the individuals who made them, and these officers are required to send the original records of these oaths to the Department of State as soon as convenient, where they will be stored and kept in the government's archives.
The Secretary of State will keep a registry thereof, and will, on application, in proper cases, issue certificates of such records in the customary form of official certificates.
The Secretary of State will maintain a registry of this, and will, upon request, issue certificates of these records in the standard format for official certificates in appropriate cases.
In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed............
In witness whereof, I have hereunto signed my name and have caused the seal of the United States to be attached............
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
TO SECRETARY STANTON.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 28, 1864.
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR.
Secretary of War.
MY DEAR SIR:—The Governor of Kentucky is here, and desires to have the following points definitely fixed:
MY DEAR SIR:—The Governor of Kentucky is here and wants to have the following points clearly established:
First. That the quotas of troops furnished, and to be furnished, by Kentucky may be adjusted upon the basis as actually reduced by able-bodied men of hers having gone into the rebel service; and that she be required to furnish no more than her just quotas upon fair adjustment upon such basis.
First. That the number of troops provided, and to be provided, by Kentucky can be adjusted based on the actual reduction caused by able-bodied men from the state joining the rebel forces; and that she should be required to supply no more than her fair share based on this adjustment.
Second. To whatever extent the enlistment and drafting, one or both, of colored troops may be found necessary within the State, it may be conducted within the law of Congress; and, so far as practicable, free from collateral embarrassments, disorders, and provocations.
Second. To whatever extent the enlistment and drafting, either one or both, of colored troops is found necessary within the State, it may be conducted according to U.S. law; and, as much as possible, free from additional complications, disturbances, and provocations.
I think these requests of the Governor are reasonable; and I shall be obliged if you will give him a full hearing, and do the best you can to effect these objects.
I think the Governor's requests are reasonable, and I would appreciate it if you could give him a full hearing and do your best to achieve these goals.
Yours very truly,
Sincerely,
TO GENERAL G. G. MEADE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 29, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE.
Major General Meade.
MY DEAR SIR:—Your letter to Colonel Townsend, inclosing a slip from the "Herald," and asking a court of inquiry, has been laid before me by the Secretary of War, with the request that I would consider it. It is quite natural that you should feel some sensibility on the subject; yet I am not impressed, nor do I think the country is impressed, with the belief that your honor demands, or the public interest demands, such an inquiry. The country knows that at all events you have done good service; and I believe it agrees with me that it is much better for you to be engaged in trying to do more, than to be diverted, as you necessarily would be, by a court of inquiry.
MY DEAR SIR:—Your letter to Colonel Townsend, including a clip from the "Herald," and your request for a court of inquiry, has been brought to my attention by the Secretary of War, who asked me to consider it. It's completely understandable that you feel some sensitivity about this matter; however, I’m not convinced, nor do I believe the public is, that your honor or the public interest requires such an inquiry. The nation acknowledges that, regardless of the circumstances, you have provided valuable service. I think most people agree with me that it’s far better for you to focus on achieving more rather than being sidetracked, as you inevitably would be, by a court of inquiry.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 29,1864.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, Army of the Potomac:
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, Army of the Potomac:
Captain Kinney, of whom I spoke to you as desiring to go on your staff, is now in your camp, in company with Mrs. Senator Dixon. Mrs. Grant and I, and some others, agreed last night that I should, by this despatch, kindly call your attention to Captain Kinney.
Captain Kinney, whom I mentioned to you as wanting to join your staff, is now in your camp, along with Mrs. Senator Dixon. Mrs. Grant and I, along with a few others, agreed last night that I should, with this message, kindly draw your attention to Captain Kinney.
TO A. G. HODGES.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, April 4, 1864.
A. G. HODGES, ESQ., Frankfort, Kentucky:
A. G. HODGES, ESQ., Frankfort, Kentucky:
MY DEAR SIR:—You ask me to put in writing the substance of what I verbally said the other day, in your presence, to Governor Bramlette and Senator Dixon. It was about as follows:
MY DEAR SIR:—You asked me to write down what I said the other day, in your presence, to Governor Bramlette and Senator Dixon. It went something like this:
"I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I cannot remember when I did not so think and feel, and yet I have never understood that the Presidency conferred upon me an unrestricted right to act officially upon this judgment and feeling. It was in the oath I took that I would to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. I could not take the office without taking the oath. Nor was it my view that I might take an oath to get power, and break the oath in using the power. I understood, too, that in ordinary civil administration this oath even forbade me to practically indulge my primary abstract judgment on the moral question of slavery. I had publicly declared this many times, and in many ways. And I aver that, to this day, I have done no official act in mere deference to my abstract judgment and feeling on slavery. I did understand, however, that my oath to preserve the Constitution to the best of my ability, imposed upon me the duty of preserving, by every indispensable means, that government, that nation, of which that Constitution was the organic law. Was it possible to lose the nation and yet preserve the Constitution? By General law, life and limb must be protected; yet often a limb must be amputated to save a life; but a life is never wisely given to save a limb. I felt that measures, otherwise unconstitutional, might become lawful, by becoming indispensable to the preservation of the Constitution, through the preservation of the nation. Right or wrong, I assumed this ground, and now avow it. I could not feel that to the best of my ability I had even tried to preserve the Constitution, if, to save slavery, or any minor matter, I should permit the wreck of government, country, and Constitution, altogether. When, early in the war, General Fremont attempted military emancipation, I forbade it, because I did not then think it an indispensable necessity. When, a little later, General Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested the arming of the blacks, I objected, because I did not yet think it an indispensable necessity. When, still later, General Hunter attempted military emancipation, I again forbade it, because I did not yet think the indispensable necessity had come. When, in March, and May, and July, 1862, I made earnest and successive appeals to the Border States to favor compensated emancipation, I believed the indispensable necessity for military emancipation and arming the blacks would come, unless averted by that measure. They declined the proposition, and I was, in my best judgment, driven to the alternative of either surrendering the Union, and with it the Constitution, or of laying strong hand upon the colored element. I chose the latter. In choosing it, I hoped for greater gain than loss, but of this I was not entirely confident. More than a year of trial now shows no loss by it in our foreign relations, none in our home popular sentiment, none in our white military force, no loss by it any how, or anywhere. On the contrary, it shows a gain of quite one hundred and thirty thousand soldiers, seamen, and laborers. These are palpable facts, about which, as facts, there can be no caviling. We have the men; and we could not have had them without the measure.
I am inherently against slavery. If slavery isn't wrong, then nothing is wrong. I can't remember a time when I didn't think and feel this way, yet I've never believed that being President gave me the unrestricted right to act on this judgment and feeling. It was in the oath I took that I would, to the best of my ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. I couldn’t accept the office without taking the oath. I also didn't think I could take an oath to gain power and then break it while using that power. I understood that in typical government operations, this oath even prevented me from indulging my personal belief on the moral issue of slavery. I’ve publicly stated this many times and in many ways. And I confirm that, to this day, I haven't taken any official action solely based on my personal judgment and feelings about slavery. However, I did understand that my oath to preserve the Constitution to the best of my ability required me to ensure the survival of that government and nation, which the Constitution governed. Could we really lose the nation and still keep the Constitution? According to general law, life and limb must be protected, yet often a limb has to be amputated to save a life; but a life should never be sacrificed just to save a limb. I believed that actions that would otherwise be unconstitutional might become lawful if they were essential for keeping the Constitution intact by preserving the nation. Right or wrong, I took this position, and I now stand by it. I felt that I couldn't say I tried my best to preserve the Constitution if I let the government, country, and Constitution fall apart just to save slavery or some minor issue. When General Fremont tried military emancipation early in the war, I stopped it because I didn’t see it as absolutely necessary. A little later, when General Cameron, then Secretary of War, suggested arming Black people, I objected, as I still didn’t think it was an absolute necessity. When General Hunter later attempted military emancipation, I again halted it because I didn’t believe the absolute necessity had arrived yet. In March, May, and July of 1862, I earnestly urged the Border States to support compensated emancipation, believing that the absolute need for military emancipation and arming Black individuals would come unless we took that step. They rejected the proposal, and I felt I had no choice but to either give up the Union—and the Constitution along with it—or take strong action involving the Black community. I chose the latter option. In making that choice, I hoped for more gain than loss, but I wasn’t entirely sure. More than a year of trying shows no negative impact on our foreign relations, none on our national sentiment at home, none on our white military strength, and no loss in any way or anywhere. On the contrary, it shows a gain of around one hundred thirty thousand soldiers, sailors, and laborers. These are clear facts, and there’s no room for argument about them. We have the people, and we couldn’t have had them without this measure.
"And now let any Union man who complains of the measure test himself by writing down in one line that he is for subduing the rebellion by force of arms; and in the next, that he is for taking these hundred and thirty thousand men from the Union side, and placing them where they would be but for the measure he condemns. If he cannot face his case so stated, it is only because he cannot face the truth."
"And now let any Union supporter who criticizes this measure challenge themselves by writing down in one line that they are for defeating the rebellion through military force; and in the next, that they are for taking these hundred and thirty thousand men from the Union side and putting them where they wouldn’t be if it weren't for the measure they oppose. If they can't confront their situation stated this way, it's only because they can't face the truth."
I add a word which was not in the verbal conversation. In telling this tale I attempt no compliment to my own sagacity. I claim not to have controlled events, but confess plainly that events have controlled me. Now, at the end of three years' struggle, the nation's condition is not what either party, or any man, devised or expected. God alone can claim it. Whither it is tending seems plain. If God now wills the removal of a great wrong, and wills also that we of the North, as well as you of the South, shall pay fairly for our complicity in that wrong, impartial history will find therein new cause to attest and revere the justice and goodness of God.
I want to add something that wasn't part of the spoken conversation. In sharing this story, I'm not trying to flatter myself. I don't say that I've controlled the events; instead, I admit that the events have controlled me. Now, after three years of struggle, the state of our nation is not what either party or any individual anticipated. That belongs solely to God. Where it’s headed seems clear. If God now desires to correct a great injustice and also wants those of us in the North, just like you in the South, to pay fairly for our part in that injustice, unbiased history will find new reasons to confirm and honor the justice and goodness of God.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TO MRS. HORACE MANN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, April 5, 1864.
MRS HORACE MANN:
MRS. HORACE MANN:
MADAM:—The petition of persons under eighteen, praying that I would free all slave children, and the heading of which petition it appears you wrote, was handed me a few days since by Senator Sumner. Please tell these little people I am very glad their young hearts are so full of just and generous sympathy, and that, while I have not the power to grant all they ask, I trust they will remember that God has, and that, as it seems, he wills to do it.
MADAM:—A few days ago, Senator Sumner handed me a petition from young people under eighteen, asking me to free all slave children, and it looks like you wrote the heading. Please let these kids know that I'm really happy their young hearts are filled with such just and generous sympathy. While I can’t grant all their requests, I hope they remember that God can, and it seems that He intends to do so.
Yours truly,
Best regards,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BUTLER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, April 12, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, Va.:
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, VA:
I am pressed to get from Libby, by special exchange, Jacob C. Hagenbuek, first lieutenant, Company H, Sixty-seventh Pennsylvania Volunteers. Please do it if you can without detriment or embarrassment.
I need to get Jacob C. Hagenbuek, first lieutenant, Company H, Sixty-seventh Pennsylvania Volunteers, from Libby through a special exchange. Please make it happen if you can do so without any trouble or issues.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, April 17, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of the Potomac:
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of the Potomac:
Private William Collins of Company B, of the Sixty-ninth New York Volunteers, has been convicted of desertion, and execution suspended as in numerous other cases. Now Captain O'Neill, commanding the regiment, and nearly all its other regimental and company officers, petition for his full pardon and restoration to his company. Is there any good objection?
Private William Collins of Company B, Sixty-ninth New York Volunteers, has been found guilty of desertion, but his execution has been put on hold like in many other cases. Now, Captain O'Neill, who commands the regiment, along with almost all the other regimental and company officers, is asking for his complete pardon and for him to be reinstated in his company. Is there any valid reason to oppose this?
LECTURE ON LIBERTY
ADDRESS AT SANITARY FAIR IN BALTIMORE,
APRIL 18, 1864.
APRIL 18, 1864.
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN:—Calling to mind that we are in Baltimore, we cannot fail to note that the world moves. Looking upon these many people assembled here to serve, as they best may, the soldiers of the Union, it occurs at once that three years ago the same soldiers could not so much as pass through Baltimore. The change from then till now is both great and gratifying. Blessings on the brave men who have wrought the change, and the fair women who strive to reward them for it!
LADIES AND GENTLEMEN:—Remembering that we are in Baltimore, we can't help but notice how much the world has changed. Seeing all these people gathered here to do their best for the soldiers of the Union, it strikes me that three years ago, those same soldiers couldn't even pass through Baltimore. The transformation from then to now is both significant and satisfying. Here's to the brave men who made this change possible, and to the wonderful women who are working to honor them!
But Baltimore suggests more than could happen within Baltimore. The change within Baltimore is part only of a far wider change. When the war began, three years ago, neither party, nor any man, expected it would last till now. Each looked for the end, in some way, long ere to-day. Neither did any anticipate that domestic slavery would be much affected by the war. But here we are; the war has not ended, and slavery has been much affected how much needs not now to be recounted. So true is it that man proposes and God disposes.
But Baltimore represents more than just what could happen within its borders. The changes happening in Baltimore are just a small part of a much larger transformation. When the war started three years ago, neither political party nor anyone expected it to last this long. Everyone anticipated an end well before today. No one expected that the war would significantly impact domestic slavery. Yet, here we are; the war is still ongoing, and slavery has been greatly affected—how much doesn’t need to be revisited now. It’s clear that while people make plans, it's ultimately up to fate.
But we can see the past, though we may not claim to have directed it; and seeing it, in this case, we feel more hopeful and confident for the future.
But we can see the past, even if we can't say we shaped it; and looking at it this way, we feel more hopeful and confident about the future.
The world has never had a good definition of the word liberty, and the American people, just now, are much in want of one. We all declare for liberty; but in using the same word we do not all mean the same thing. With some the word liberty may mean for each man to do as he pleases with himself, and the product of his labor; while with others the same word may mean for some men to do as they please with other men, and the product of other men's labor. Here are two, not only different, but incompatible things, called by the same name, liberty. And it follows that each of the things is, by the respective parties, called by two different and incompatible names—liberty and tyranny.
The world has never had a clear definition of the word liberty, and right now, the American people really need one. We all claim to believe in liberty, but when we use the same word, we don’t all mean the same thing. For some, liberty may mean that each person can do whatever they want with themselves and their work; while for others, the same word might mean that some people can do whatever they want with other people and what those people produce. Here we have two ideas that are not only different but also completely opposed, both called liberty. As a result, each group sees their idea as two different and conflicting names—liberty and tyranny.
The shepherd drives the wolf from the sheep's throat, for which the sheep thanks the shepherd as his liberator, while the wolf denounces him for the same act, as the destroyer of liberty, especially as the sheep was a black one. Plainly, the sheep and the wolf are not agreed upon a definition of the word liberty; and precisely the same difference prevails to-day among us human creatures, even in the North, and all professing to love liberty. Hence we behold the process by which thousands are daily passing from under the yoke of bondage hailed by some as the advance of liberty, and bewailed by others as the destruction of all liberty. Recently, as it seems, the people of Maryland have been doing something to define liberty, and thanks to them that, in what they have done, the wolf's dictionary has been repudiated.
The shepherd drives the wolf away from the sheep's throat, and the sheep thanks the shepherd as its savior, while the wolf criticizes him for the same action, calling him the destroyer of freedom, especially since the sheep was a black one. Clearly, the sheep and the wolf have different views on the meaning of freedom; and this same disagreement exists today among us humans, even in the North, even among those who claim to value freedom. Therefore, we see how thousands are daily moving out from under oppression, celebrated by some as a victory for freedom and mourned by others as the end of all freedom. Recently, it seems, the people of Maryland have been taking steps to define freedom, and we are grateful to them for rejecting the wolf's version of the dictionary in what they have achieved.
It is not very becoming for one in my position to make speeches at length; but there is another subject upon which I feel that I ought to say a word. A painful rumor, true, I fear, has reached us, of the massacre, by the rebel forces at Fort Pillow, in the west end of Tennessee, on the Mississippi River, of some three hundred colored soldiers and white officers [I believe it latter turned out to be 500], who had just been overpowered by their assailants [numbering 5000]. There seems to be some anxiety in the public mind whether the Government is doing its duty to the colored soldier, and to the service, at this point. At the beginning of the war, and for some time, the use of colored troops was not contemplated; and how the change of purpose was wrought I will not now take time to explain. Upon a clear conviction of duty I resolved to turn that element of strength to account; and I am responsible for it to the American people, to the Christian world, to history, and in my final account to God. Having determined to use the negro as a soldier, there is no way but to give him all the protection given to any other soldier. The difficulty is not in stating the principle, but in practically applying it. It is a mistake to suppose the Government is indifferent to this matter, or is not doing the best it can in regard to it. We do not to-day know that a colored soldier, or white officer commanding colored soldiers, has been massacred by the rebels when made a prisoner. We fear it, we believe it, I may say,—but we do not know it. To take the life of one of their prisoners on the assumption that they murder ours, when it is short of certainty that they do murder ours, might be too serious, too cruel, a mistake. We are having the Fort Pillow affair thoroughly investigated; and such investigation will probably show conclusively how the truth is. If after all that has been said it shall turn out that there has been no massacre at Fort Pillow, it will be almost safe to say there has been none, and will be none, elsewhere. If there has been the massacre of three hundred there, or even the tenth part of three hundred, it will be conclusively proved; and being so proved, the retribution shall as surely come. It will be matter of grave consideration in what exact course to apply the retribution; but in the supposed case it must come.
It's not really appropriate for someone in my position to give long speeches; however, there's an important topic I feel I need to address. A distressing rumor, which I fear may be true, has come to our attention regarding the massacre by rebel forces at Fort Pillow in western Tennessee along the Mississippi River, where around three hundred colored soldiers and white officers [it later turned out to be 500] were overpowered by their attackers [who numbered 5000]. There's growing concern among the public about whether the Government is fulfilling its responsibility to the colored soldiers and the service at this moment. At the start of the war, using colored troops wasn't even considered, and I won't take time to explain how that changed now. Based on a strong sense of duty, I decided to utilize that source of strength, and I hold myself accountable for it to the American people, to the Christian community, to history, and ultimately to God. Having decided to enlist the negro as a soldier, I see no reason not to provide them with the same protections afforded to any other soldier. The challenge lies not in stating this principle, but in putting it into practice. It's a misconception to think the Government is indifferent to this issue or isn’t doing its best regarding it. As of today, we don’t know that a colored soldier or a white officer commanding colored soldiers has been killed by the rebels when captured. We fear it, we believe it, I might say—but we don’t know for certain. To take the life of one of their prisoners based on the assumption that they kill ours, especially when there’s uncertainty about that claim, could be too severe and too cruel a mistake. We are conducting a thorough investigation into the Fort Pillow incident, and that investigation will likely reveal the truth. If, after everything that has been said, it turns out that there was no massacre at Fort Pillow, we can almost confidently say there hasn’t been and won’t be one elsewhere. If there has indeed been a massacre of three hundred there, or even a fraction of that number, it will be proven without a doubt; if so, then the retribution will certainly follow. It will be a serious matter to decide the exact course of that retribution, but in that hypothetical situation, it must happen.
[There was a massacre of a black company and their officers at Fort Pillow—they were prisoners who later on, the day of their capture, were ordered executed. The black soldiers were tied alive to individual planks—then man and plank were cobbled up like cord wood and burned. The white officers were shot. D.W.]
[There was a massacre of a Black unit and their officers at Fort Pillow—they were prisoners who were ordered to be executed later on, the day they were captured. The Black soldiers were tied alive to individual planks—then both the man and the plank were stacked up like firewood and burned. The white officers were shot. D.W.]
TO CALVIN TRUESDALE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, April 20, 1864.
CALVIN TRUESDALE, ESQ., Postmaster, Rock Island, Ill.:
CALVIN TRUESDALE, ESQ., Postmaster, Rock Island, IL:
Thomas J. Pickett, late agent of the Quartermaster 's Department for the island of Rock Island, has been removed or suspended from that position on a charge of having sold timber and stone from the island for his private benefit. Mr. Pickett is an old acquaintance and friend of mine, and I will thank you, if you will, to set a day or days and place on and at which to take testimony on the point. Notify Mr. Pickett and one J. B. Danforth (who, as I understand, makes the charge) to be present with their witnesses. Take the testimony in writing offered by both sides, and report it in full to me. Please do this for me.
Thomas J. Pickett, former agent of the Quartermaster’s Department for Rock Island, has been removed or suspended from his position due to allegations of selling timber and stone from the island for his personal gain. Mr. Pickett is an old acquaintance and friend of mine, and I would appreciate it if you could arrange a date or dates and a location for gathering testimonies on this matter. Please notify Mr. Pickett and J. B. Danforth (who I understand is making the allegations) to be present along with their witnesses. Collect the written testimonies from both sides and report them to me in full. I would be grateful if you could take care of this for me.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER COMMANDING AT FORT WARREN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, April 20, 1864.
OFFICER IN MILITARY COMMAND, Fort Warren, Boston Harbor, Mass.:
OFFICER IN MILITARY COMMAND, Fort Warren, Boston Harbor, MA:
If there is a man by the name of Charles Carpenter, under sentence of death for desertion, at Fort Warren, suspend execution until further order and send the record of his trial. If sentenced for any other offence, telegraph what it is and when he is to be executed. Answer at all events.
If there's a man named Charles Carpenter, sentenced to death for desertion at Fort Warren, hold off on the execution until further notice and send me the record of his trial. If he's sentenced for any other crime, please send a telegram with the details of the offense and the execution date. Respond regardless.
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER COMMANDING AT FORT WARREN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, April 21,1864.
OFFICER IN COMMAND AT FORT WARREN, Boston Harbor, Mass.:
OFFICER IN CHARGE AT FORT WARREN, Boston Harbor, Mass.:
The order I sent yesterday in regard to Charles Carpenter is hereby withdrawn and you are to act as if it never existed.
The order I sent yesterday about Charles Carpenter is now canceled, and you should act as if it never happened.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL DIX.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., April 21, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL Dix, New York:
Major-General Dix, New York:
Yesterday I was induced to telegraph the officer in military command at Fort Warren, Boston Harbor, Massachusetts, suspending the execution of Charles Carpenter, to be executed tomorrow for desertion. Just now, on reaching your order in the case, I telegraphed the same officer withdrawing the suspension, and leave the case entirely with you. The man's friends are pressing me, but I refer them to you, intending to take no further action myself.
Yesterday, I was prompted to send a telegram to the officer in charge at Fort Warren, Boston Harbor, Massachusetts, to postpone the execution of Charles Carpenter, who was set to be executed tomorrow for desertion. Just now, after receiving your order on the matter, I sent another telegram to the same officer retracting the suspension and leaving the case entirely in your hands. The man’s friends are urging me, but I’m directing them to you, as I don’t plan to take any further action myself.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BUTLER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, April 23, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, Va.:
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, VA:
Senator Ten Eyck is very anxious to have a special exchange of Capt. Frank J. McLean, of Ninth Tennessee Cavalry now, or lately, at Johnson's Island, for Capt. T. Ten Eyck, Eighteenth U. S. Infantry, and now at Richmond. I would like to have it done. Can it be?
Senator Ten Eyck is eager to arrange a special exchange of Capt. Frank J. McLean, from the Ninth Tennessee Cavalry, who is currently or recently at Johnson's Island, for Capt. T. Ten Eyck, from the Eighteenth U.S. Infantry, who is now in Richmond. I would like to see this happen. Is it possible?
INDORSEMENT ON OFFER OF TROOPS, APRIL 23, 1864.
TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES:
1. The Governors of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, and Wisconsin offer to the President infantry troops for the approaching campaign as follows: Ohio, thirty thousand; Indiana, twenty thousand; Illinois, twenty thousand; Iowa, ten thousand; Wisconsin, five thousand.
1. The Governors of Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, and Wisconsin are offering the President infantry troops for the upcoming campaign as follows: Ohio, 30,000; Indiana, 20,000; Illinois, 20,000; Iowa, 10,000; Wisconsin, 5,000.
2. The term of service to be one hundred days, reckoned from the date of muster into the service of the United States, unless sooner discharged.
2. The service period will be one hundred days, starting from the date of joining the United States service, unless discharged sooner.
3. The troops to be mustered into the service of the United States by regiments, when the regiments are filled up, according to regulations, to the minimum strength—the regiments to be organized according to the regulations of the War Department. The whole number to be furnished within twenty days from date of notice of the acceptance of this proposition.
3. The troops will be assembled into the service of the United States by regiments, once the regiments are filled to the minimum required strength, following the regulations. The regiments will be organized according to the War Department's rules. The total number must be provided within twenty days of receiving notice that this proposal is accepted.
4. The troops to be clothed, armed, equipped, subsisted; transported, and paid as other United States infantry volunteers, and to serve in fortifications,—or wherever their services may be required, within or without their respective States.
4. The troops will be provided with clothing, weapons, equipment, food; transported, and paid like other United States infantry volunteers, and will serve in fortifications—or wherever their services are needed, both within and outside their respective States.
5. No bounty to be paid the troops, nor the service charged or credited on any draft.
5. No rewards will be given to the troops, and no service will be counted or credited on any draft.
6. The draft for three years' service to go on in any State or district where the quota is not filled up; but if any officer or soldier in this special service should be drafted, he shall be credited for the service rendered.
6. The draft for three years of service will continue in any state or district where the quota hasn’t been filled; however, if any officer or soldier in this special service is drafted, they will receive credit for the service completed.
JOHN BROUGH, Governor of Ohio. O. P. MORTON, Governor of Indiana. RICHARD PATES, Governor of Illinois. WILLIAM M. STONE, Governor of Iowa. JAMES T. LEWIS, Governor of Wisconsin
JOHN BROUGH, Governor of Ohio. O. P. MORTON, Governor of Indiana. RICHARD PATES, Governor of Illinois. WILLIAM M. STONE, Governor of Iowa. JAMES T. LEWIS, Governor of Wisconsin.
(Indorsement.)
(Endorsement.)
April 23, 1864.
April 23, 1864.
The foregoing proposition of the governors is accepted, and the Secretary of War is directed to carry it into execution.
The previous proposal from the governors is accepted, and the Secretary of War is instructed to execute it.
TO SECRETARY STANTON.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, April 23, 1864.
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR:
SECRETARY OF WAR:
MY DEAR SIR:—According to our understanding with Major-General Frank P. Blair at the time he took his seat in Congress last winter, he now asks to withdraw his resignation as Major-General, then tendered, and be sent to the field. Let this be done. Let the order sending him be such as shown me to-day by the Adjutant-General, only dropping from it the names of Maguire and Tompkins.
MY DEAR SIR:—As we agreed with Major-General Frank P. Blair when he joined Congress last winter, he is now requesting to withdraw his resignation as Major-General and to be deployed to the field. Let's proceed with this. The order sending him should be the one the Adjutant-General showed me today, but remove the names of Maguire and Tompkins.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO JOHN WILLIAMS.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON CITY, April 25, 1864.
JOHN WILLIAMS, Springfield, Ill.:
JOHN WILLIAMS, Springfield, IL:
Yours of the 15th is just received. Thanks for your kind remembrance. I would accept your offer at once, were it not that I fear there might be some impropriety in it, though I do not see that there would. I will think of it a while.
I just got your letter from the 15th. Thank you for thinking of me. I would accept your offer right away, but I worry that there might be some issue with it, even though I don’t really see why. I’ll consider it for a bit.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON CITY, April 25, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of Potomac:
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of the Potomac:
A Mr. Corby brought you a note from me at the foot of a petition I believe, in the case of Dawson, to be executed to-day. The record has been examined here, and it shows too strong a case for a pardon or commutation, unless there is something in the poor man's favor outside of the record, which you on the ground may know, but I do not. My note to you only means that if you know of any such thing rendering a suspension of the execution proper, on your own judgment, you are at liberty to suspend it. Otherwise I do not interfere.
A Mr. Corby delivered a note from me along with a petition, I believe, in the case of Dawson, who is set to be executed today. The record has been reviewed here, and it shows a strong enough case against granting a pardon or reducing the sentence, unless there’s something in the poor man’s favor beyond the record that you might know but I don’t. My note to you simply means that if you’re aware of any reason that justifies delaying the execution based on your own judgment, you can go ahead and postpone it. Otherwise, I won’t interfere.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL THOMAS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., April 26, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL THOMAS, Chattanooga, Term.:
MAJOR-GENERAL THOMAS, Chattanooga, Term.
Suspend execution of death sentence of young Perry, of Wisconsin, condemned for sleeping on his post, till further orders, and forward record for examination.
Suspend the execution of the death sentence for young Perry from Wisconsin, who was condemned for sleeping on duty, until further notice, and send the record for review.
TO GOVERNOR MURPHY.
WASHINGTON, D. C., April 27, 1864.
GOVERNOR MURPHY, Little Rock, Arkansas:
GOVERNOR MURPHY, Little Rock, AR:
I am much gratified to learn that you got out so large a vote, so nearly all the right way, at the late election; and not less so that your State government including the legislature, is organized and in good working order. Whatever I can I will do to protect you; meanwhile you must do your utmost to protect yourselves. Present my greeting to all.
I’m really glad to hear that you received such a large vote, almost all in the right direction, in the recent election; and I’m equally pleased that your state government, including the legislature, is organized and functioning well. I’ll do everything I can to support you; in the meantime, you must do your best to protect yourselves. Please send my regards to everyone.
MESSAGE TO CONGRESS, APRIL 28, 1864.
TO THE HONORABLE THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
I have the honor to transmit herewith an address to the President of the United States, and through him to both Houses of Congress, on the condition and wants of the people of east Tennessee, and asking their attention to the necessity of some action on the part of the Government for their relief, and which address is presented by a committee of an organization called "The East Tennessee Relief Association."
I am pleased to share an address to the President of the United States, and through him to both Houses of Congress, regarding the needs and conditions of the people of East Tennessee. We are requesting their attention to the urgent need for government action to provide relief, which this address is submitted by a committee from an organization called "The East Tennessee Relief Association."
Deeply commiserating the condition of these most loyal and suffering people, I am unprepared to make any specific recommendation for their relief. The military is doing and will continue to do the best for them within its power. Their address represents that the construction of direct railroad communication between Knoxville and Cincinnati by way of central Kentucky would be of great consequence in the present emergency. It may be remembered that in the annual message of December, 1861, such railroad construction was recommended. I now add that, with the hearty concurrence of Congress, I would yet be pleased to construct a road, both for the relief of these people and for its continuing military importance.
Feeling a deep sense of sympathy for the situation of these loyal and suffering people, I'm not ready to make any specific recommendations for their aid. The military is doing—and will continue to do—the best it can for them. They have pointed out that building direct railroad connections between Knoxville and Cincinnati through central Kentucky would be very important in the current crisis. It may be recalled that in my annual message from December 1861, I suggested such railroad construction. I would now like to add that, with the full support of Congress, I would be happy to build this railroad both to help these people and for its ongoing military significance.
MESSAGE TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,
APRIL 28, 1864.
TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
TO THE HOUSE OF REPS:
In obedience to the resolution of your honorable body, a copy of which is herewith returned, I have the honor to make the following brief statement, which is believed to contain the information sought:
In response to the resolution from your esteemed group, a copy of which is attached, I am pleased to provide the following brief statement, which I believe contains the information you are looking for:
Prior to and at the meeting of the present Congress, Robert C. Schenck, of Ohio, and Frank P. Blair, Jr., of Missouri, members elect thereto, by and with the consent of the Senate held commissions from the Executive as major-generals in the volunteer army. General Schenck tendered the resignation of his said commission, and took his seat in the House of Representatives, at the assembling thereof, upon the distinct verbal understanding with the Secretary of War and the Executive that he might, at any time during the session, at his own pleasure, withdraw said resignation and return to the field.
Before and during the current Congress meeting, Robert C. Schenck from Ohio and Frank P. Blair, Jr. from Missouri, who were elected members, received commissions from the Senate as major generals in the volunteer army with the Executive's consent. General Schenck submitted his resignation for that commission and took his seat in the House of Representatives as it convened, based on a clear verbal agreement with the Secretary of War and the President that he could withdraw his resignation and return to active duty at any time during the session if he so chose.
General Blair was, by temporary assignment of General Sherman, in command of a corps through the battles in front of Chattanooga, and in the march to the relief of Knoxville, which occurred in the latter days of November and early days of December last, and of course was not present at the assembling of Congress. When he subsequently arrived here, he sought, and was allowed by the Secretary of War and the Executive, the same conditions and promise as allowed and made to General Schenck.
General Blair was temporarily assigned by General Sherman to lead a corps during the battles in front of Chattanooga and on the march to help Knoxville, which took place in late November and early December. Naturally, he wasn't present when Congress convened. When he arrived later, he requested and received from the Secretary of War and the Executive the same conditions and promises that were given to General Schenck.
General Schenck has not applied to withdraw his resignation; but when General Grant was made Lieutenant-General, producing some change of commanders, General Blair sought to be assigned to the command of a corps. This was made known to Generals Grant and Sherman, and assented to by them, and the particular corps for him designated.
General Schenck hasn't requested to take back his resignation; however, when General Grant became Lieutenant-General, leading to a shift in commanders, General Blair requested to be assigned to lead a corps. This was communicated to Generals Grant and Sherman, who agreed, and the specific corps was assigned to him.
This was all arranged and understood, as now remembered, so much as a month ago; but the formal withdrawal of General Blair's resignation, and making the order assigning him to the command of the corps, were not consummated at the War Department until last week, perhaps on the 23d of April instant. As a summary of the whole, it may be stated that General Blair holds no military commission or appointment other than as herein stated, and that it is believed he is now acting as major-General upon the assumed validity of the commission herein stated, in connection with the facts herein stated, and not otherwise. There are some letters, notes, telegrams, orders, entries, and perhaps other documents in connection with this subject, which it is believed would throw no additional light upon it, but which will be cheerfully furnished if desired.
This was all arranged and understood, as I remember, about a month ago; however, the official retraction of General Blair's resignation and the order assigning him to lead the corps weren't finalized at the War Department until last week, possibly on April 23rd. To summarize, General Blair holds no military commission or appointment other than what's mentioned here, and it’s believed that he is currently acting as a major general based on the assumed validity of the commission stated here, along with the facts presented, and nothing more. There are some letters, notes, telegrams, orders, entries, and possibly other documents related to this topic that probably wouldn’t add any new information, but they can be provided if needed.
TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, April 30, 1864.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT:
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT:
Not expecting to see you before the spring campaign opens, I wish to express in this way my entire satisfaction with what you have done up to this time, so far as I understand it.
Not expecting to see you before the spring campaign starts, I want to express my complete satisfaction with everything you’ve done so far, as far as I understand it.
The particulars of your plans I neither know nor seek to know. You are vigilant and self-reliant; and, pleased with this, I wish not to obtrude any restraints or constraints upon you. While I am very anxious that any great disaster or capture of our men in great number shall be avoided, I know that these points are less likely to escape your attention than they would be mine. If there be anything wanting which is within my power to give, do not fail to let me know it.
I don’t know the details of your plans, and I’m not trying to find out. You’re careful and capable; I’m happy with that, and I don’t want to impose any limits on you. While I really want to prevent any major disaster or capture of our people in large numbers, I’m sure you’re more aware of those concerns than I would be. If there’s anything you need that I can provide, please let me know.
And now, with a brave army and a just cause, may God sustain you.
And now, with a courageous army and a righteous cause, may God support you.
Yours very truly,
Best regards,
MESSAGE TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
MAY 2, 1864.
TO THE HONORABLE THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
TO THE HONORABLE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
In compliance with the request contained in your resolution of the 29th ultimo, a copy of which resolution is herewith returned, I have the honor to transmit the following:
In response to your request from your resolution dated the 29th of last month, a copy of which is included here, I am pleased to send the following:
[Correspondence and orders relating to the resignation and reinstatement of Major-General Frank P. Blair, Jr., of Missouri.]
[Correspondence and orders about the resignation and reinstatement of Major-General Frank P. Blair, Jr., of Missouri.]
The foregoing constitutes all sought by the resolution so far as is remembered or has been found upon diligent search.
The above includes everything requested by the resolution as far as is remembered or has been found through thorough searching.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN.
WASHINGTON, D. C., May 4, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERMAN, Chattanooga, Tenn.:
MAJOR GENERAL SHERMAN, Chattanooga, TN:
I have an imploring appeal in behalf of the citizens who say your Order No.8 will compel them to go north of Nashville. This is in no sense an order, nor is it even a request that you will do anything which in the least shall be a drawback upon your military operations, but anything you can do consistently with those operations for those suffering people I shall be glad of.
I have a heartfelt request on behalf of the citizens who say your Order No.8 will force them to move north of Nashville. This is not an order, nor is it even a request for you to do anything that would hinder your military operations, but anything you can do that aligns with those operations to help those suffering individuals would be greatly appreciated.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL ROSECRANS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May 5, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL ROSECRANS, Commanding, Saint Louis, Mo.:
MAJOR-GENERAL ROSECRANS, Commanding, St. Louis, MO:
The President directs me to inquire whether a day has yet been fixed for the execution of citizen Robert Louden, and if so what day?
The President asks me to find out if a date has been set for the execution of citizen Robert Louden, and if it has, what day is it?
JOHN HAY, Major and Assistant Adjutant-General.
JOHN HAY, Major and Assistant Adjutant-General.
TO MRS. S. B. McCONKEY.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May 9, 1864.
MRS. SARAH B. McCONKEY, West Chester, Pa.:
MRS. SARAH B. McCONKEY, West Chester, Pa.:
MADAM:—Our mutual friend, Judge Lewis, tells me you do me the honor to inquire for my personal welfare. I have been very anxious for some days in regard to our armies in the field, but am considerably cheered, just now, by favorable news from them.
MADAM:—Our mutual friend, Judge Lewis, informs me you’re kind enough to ask about my well-being. I've been quite worried for the past few days about our troops in the field, but I'm feeling much better now thanks to some good news from them.
I am sure you will join me in the hope for their further success; while yourself, and other good mothers, wives, sisters, and daughters, do all you and they can, to relieve and comfort the gallant soldiers who compose them.
I’m sure you’ll share my hopes for their continued success, while you and other amazing mothers, wives, sisters, and daughters do everything you can to support and comfort the brave soldiers who make up their ranks.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
RECOMMENDATION OF THANKSGIVING.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May 9, 1864
TO THE FRIENDS OF UNION AND LIBERTY:
TO THE FRIENDS OF UNION AND LIBERTY:
Enough is known of army operations, within the last five days, to claim our special gratitude to God. While what remains undone demands our most sincere prayers to and reliance upon Him (without whom all effort is vain), I recommend that all patriots at their homes, in their places of public worship, and wherever they may be, unite in common thanksgiving and prayer to Almighty God.
Enough is known about army operations over the last five days to give us special gratitude to God. While what still needs to be done requires our sincere prayers and trust in Him (without whom all effort is pointless), I suggest that all patriots at home, in their places of worship, and wherever they are, come together in shared thanksgiving and prayer to Almighty God.
RESPONSE TO A SERENADE,
MAY 9, 1864.
FELLOW-CITIZENS:—I am very much obliged to you for the compliment of this call, though I apprehend it is owing more to the good news received to-day from the Army, than to a desire to see me. I am indeed very grateful to the brave men who have been struggling with the enemy in the field, to their noble commanders who have directed them, and especially to our Maker. Our commanders are following up their victories resolutely and successfully. I think, without knowing the particulars of the plans of General Grant, that what has been accomplished is of more importance than at first appears. I believe, I know (and am especially grateful to know) that General Grant has not been jostled in his purposes, that he has made all his points, and to-day he is on his line as he purposed before he moved his armies. I will volunteer to say that I am very glad at what has happened, but there is a great deal still to be done. While we are grateful to all the brave men and officers for the events of the past few days, we should, above all, be very grateful to Almighty God, who gives us victory.
DEAR FRIENDS:—I truly appreciate your kind gesture in coming here, though I suspect it's more because of the good news from the Army today than a desire to see me. I'm really thankful for the brave soldiers who have been fighting the enemy, for their noble leaders who have guided them, and especially to our Creator. Our leaders are actively and successfully pursuing their victories. I believe, even without knowing all of General Grant's plans, that what has been achieved is more significant than it may seem at first. I believe, and I'm especially thankful to know, that General Grant has stayed focused on his goals, that he has hit all his marks, and today he is where he intended to be before moving his troops. I want to express how glad I am about what's happened, but there’s still a lot to accomplish. While we are thankful to all the courageous men and officers for the events of the last few days, we should especially be grateful to Almighty God, who grants us victory.
There is enough yet before us requiring all loyal men and patriots to perform their share of the labor and follow the example of the modest General at the head of our armies, and sink all personal consideration for the sake of the country. I commend you to keep yourselves in the same tranquil mood that is characteristic of that brave and loyal man. I have said more than I expected when I came before you. Repeating my thanks for this call, I bid you good-bye.
There’s still a lot of work ahead of us that requires all loyal people and patriots to do their part and follow the example of the humble General leading our armies, setting aside personal interests for the sake of the country. I encourage you to remain in the same calm state that’s typical of that brave and loyal man. I’ve said more than I intended when I came to speak with you. Thank you again for this opportunity, and I wish you all goodbye.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL LEW WALLACE.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., May 10, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL WALLACE, Baltimore:
MAJ. GEN. WALLACE, Baltimore:
Please tell me what is the trouble with Dr. Hawks. Also please ask Bishop Whittington to give me his view of the case.
Please let me know what the issue is with Dr. Hawks. Also, please ask Bishop Whittington to share his perspective on the case.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. ROSECRANS,
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May 11, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL ROSECRANS, St. Louis, Missouri:
MAJOR-GENERAL ROSECRANS, St. Louis, MO:
Complaints are coming to me of disturbances in Canoll, Platte, and Buchanan counties. Please ascertain the truth, correct what is found wrong, and telegraph me.
I'm receiving complaints about disturbances in Canoll, Platte, and Buchanan counties. Please find out what's going on, fix any issues you discover, and send me a telegram.
TO P. B. LOOMIS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May 12, 1864
F. B. LOOMIS, ESQ.
F.B. Loomis, Esq.
MY DEAR SIR:—I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your communication of the 28th April, in which you offer to replace the present garrison at Port Trumbull with volunteers, which you propose to raise at your own expense. While it seems inexpedient at this time to accept this proposition on account of the special duties now devolving upon the garrison mentioned, I cannot pass unnoticed such a meritorious instance of individual patriotism. Permit me, for the Government, to express my cordial thanks to you for this generous and public-spirited offer, which is worthy of note among the many called forth in these times of national trial.
Dear Sir, I am writing to acknowledge receipt of your message from April 28, in which you offer to replace the current garrison at Port Trumbull with volunteers that you plan to recruit at your own expense. Although it doesn't seem practical to accept this offer right now due to the specific duties currently assigned to the garrison, I must recognize this commendable act of individual patriotism. On behalf of the Government, I want to express my sincere gratitude for your generous and community-minded offer, which stands out among the many that have emerged during these challenging times for our nation.
I am very truly, your obedient servant,
I am sincerely your devoted servant,
RESPONSE TO A METHODIST DELEGATION, MAY 14, 1864.
GENTLEMEN:-In response to your address, allow me to attest the accuracy of its historical statements, indorse the sentiments it expresses, and thank you in the nation's name for the sure promise it gives. Nobly sustained, as the Government has been, by all the churches, I would utter nothing which might in the least appear invidious against any. Yet without this, it may fairly be said, that the Methodist Episcopal Church, not less devoted than the best, is by its greatest numbers the most important of all. It is no fault in others that the Methodist Church sends more soldiers to the field, more nurses to the hospitals, and more prayers to Heaven than—any other. God bless the Methodist Church Bless all the churches; and blessed be God, who in this our great trial giveth us the churches.
GENTLEMEN: In response to your address, I want to confirm the accuracy of its historical statements, support the sentiments expressed, and thank you on behalf of the nation for the positive promise it offers. The Government has been nobly supported by all the churches, and I don’t want to say anything that might seem unfair to any of them. However, it's fair to say that the Methodist Episcopal Church, just as devoted as the best, is the most significant of all due to its larger numbers. It's not anyone's fault that the Methodist Church sends more soldiers to the front lines, more nurses to the hospitals, and more prayers to Heaven than any other. God bless the Methodist Church. Bless all the churches; and blessed be God, who, in this great trial, gives us the churches.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR YATES. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May 18, 1864.
His EXCELLENCY RICHARD YATES, Springfield, Ill.:
If any such proclamation has appeared, it is a forgery.
If any such proclamation has been issued, it is a fake.
ARREST AND IMPRISONMENT OF IRRESPONSIBLE NEWSPAPER REPORTERS AND EDITORS
ORDER TO GENERAL J. A. DIX.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May 18, 1864.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May 18, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL JOHN A. DIX, Commanding at New York:
MAJOR-GENERAL JOHN A. DIX, Commanding in New York:
Whereas there has been wickedly and traitorously printed and published this morning in the New York World and New York Journal of Commerce, newspapers printed and published in the city of New York, a false and spurious proclamation purporting to be signed by the President and to be countersigned by the Secretary of State, which publication is of a treasonable nature, designed to give aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States and to the rebels now at war against the Government and their aiders and abettors, you are therefore hereby commanded forthwith to arrest and imprison in any fort or military prison in your command, the editors, proprietors, and publishers of the aforesaid newspapers, and all such persons as, after public notice has been given of the falsehood of said publication, print and publish the same with intent to give aid and comfort to the enemy; and you will hold the persons so arrested in close custody until they can be brought to trial before a military commission for their offense. You will also take possession by military force of the printing establishments of the New York World and Journal of Commerce, and hold the same until further orders, and prohibit any further publication therefrom.
Whereas this morning the New York World and New York Journal of Commerce, newspapers based in New York City, have published a false and fraudulent proclamation that seems to be signed by the President and countersigned by the Secretary of State, which is treasonous in nature and aims to aid and support the enemies of the United States and the rebels currently fighting against the Government, you are hereby ordered to immediately arrest and detain in any fort or military prison under your control, the editors, owners, and publishers of those newspapers, along with anyone who, after being publicly informed about the falsehood of that publication, continues to print and publish the same with the intention of aiding the enemy; and you will keep the arrested individuals in close custody until they can be tried by a military commission for their actions. You will also take control by military force of the printing facilities of the New York World and Journal of Commerce, and retain possession until further notice, prohibiting any further publications from them.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
[On the morning of May 18, 3864, a forged proclamation was published in the World, and Journal of Commerce, of New York. The proclamation named a day for fasting and prayer, called for 400,000 fresh troops, and purposed to raise by an "immediate and peremptory draft," whatever quotas were not furnished on the day specified. Ed.]
[On the morning of May 18, 3864, a fake proclamation was published in the World and Journal of Commerce of New York. The proclamation set a day for fasting and prayer, called for 400,000 new troops, and aimed to raise, through an "immediate and mandatory draft," any quotas that weren't provided by the specified date. Ed.]
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL B. P. BUTLER.
(Cipher.)
WASHINGTON, D. C., May 18, 1864.
WASHINGTON, D. C., May 18, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Bermuda Hundred, Va.:
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Bermuda Hundred, VA:
Until receiving your dispatch of yesterday, the idea of commissions in the volunteers expiring at the end of three years had not occurred to me. I think no trouble will come of it; and, at all events, I shall take care of it so far as in me lies. As to the major-generalships in the regular army, I think I shall not dispose of another, at least until the combined operations now in progress, under direction of General Grant, and within which yourself and command are included, shall be terminated.
Until I got your message yesterday, it hadn't crossed my mind that the volunteer commissions would end after three years. I don’t think it will cause any issues; and, in any case, I’ll handle it as best as I can. Regarding the major-general positions in the regular army, I don’t plan to fill another one, at least not until the joint operations currently underway, led by General Grant and involving you and your command, are completed.
Meanwhile, on behalf of yourself, officers, and men, please accept my hearty thanks for what you and they have so far done.
Meanwhile, on behalf of yourself, the officers, and the team, please accept my sincere thanks for everything you and they have done so far.
ORDER CONCERNING THE EXEMPTION OF AMERICAN CONSULS FROM MILITARY SERVICE
MAY 19, 1864.
It is officially announced by the State Department that citizens of the United States holding commissions and recognized as Consuls of foreign powers, are not by law exempt from military service if drafted:
It is officially announced by the State Department that U.S. citizens who hold commissions and are recognized as Consuls of foreign powers are not exempt from military service if drafted:
Therefore the mere enrolment of a citizen holding a foreign consulate will not be held to vacate his commission, but if he shall be drafted his exequatur will be revoked unless he shall have previously resigned in order that another Consul may be received.
Therefore, just enrolling a citizen who holds a foreign consulate won’t automatically cancel their commission. However, if they are drafted, their exequatur will be revoked unless they have resigned beforehand so that another Consul can be accepted.
An exequatur bearing date the 3d day of May, 1858, having been issued to Charles Hunt, a citizen of the United States, recognizing him as a Consul of Belgium for St. Louis, Missouri, and declaring him free to exercise and enjoy such functions, powers, and privileges as are allowed to the Consuls of the most favored nations in the United States, and the said Hunt having sought to screen himself from his military duty to his country, in consequence of thus being invested with the consular functions of a foreign power in the United States, it is deemed advisable that the said Charles Hunt should no longer be permitted to continue in the exercise of said functions, powers, and privileges.
An exequatur dated May 3, 1858, was issued to Charles Hunt, a citizen of the United States, recognizing him as a Consul of Belgium for St. Louis, Missouri, and declaring him free to perform the functions, powers, and privileges granted to consuls of the most favored nations in the United States. Since Hunt attempted to avoid his military duty to his country by claiming these consular functions for a foreign power in the United States, it is considered advisable that Charles Hunt should no longer be allowed to continue exercising those functions, powers, and privileges.
These are therefore to declare that I no longer recognize the said Hunt as Consul of Belgium, for St. Louis, Missouri, and will not permit him to exercise or enjoy any of the functions, powers or privileges allowed to consuls of that nation, and that I do hereby wholly revoke and annul the said exequatur heretofore given, and do declare the same to be absolutely null and void from this day forward.
I hereby declare that I no longer recognize the mentioned Hunt as the Consul of Belgium for St. Louis, Missouri, and I will not allow him to perform or enjoy any of the functions, powers, or privileges granted to consuls of that nation. I fully revoke and cancel the previous exequatur granted, declaring it completely null and void from today onward.
In testimony whereof, I have caused these letters to be made patent, and the seal of the United States of America to be hereunto affixed................
In witness whereof, I have had these letters made official, and the seal of the United States of America is affixed here.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR MORTON AND OTHERS. EXECUTIVE MANSION, May 21, 1864
GOVERNOR O. P. MORTON:
The getting forward of hundred-day troops to sustain General Sherman's lengthening lines promises much good. Please put your best efforts into the work.
The advance of the hundred-day troops to support General Sherman's expanding lines looks very promising. Please give it your all in this effort.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
Same to Governor Yates, Springfield, Illinois; Governor Stone, Davenport, Iowa; Governor Lewis, Madison, Wisconsin.
Same to Governor Yates, Springfield, Illinois; Governor Stone, Davenport, Iowa; Governor Lewis, Madison, Wisconsin.
TELEGRAM TO CHRISTIANA A. SACK. WAR DEPARTMENT WASHINGTON, D. C., May 21,
1864
1864
CHRISTIANA A. SACK, Baltimore, Md.:
CHRISTIANA A. SACK, Baltimore, MD:
I cannot postpone the execution of a convicted spy on a mere telegraphic despatch signed with a name I never heard before. General Wallace may give you a pass to see him if he chooses.
I can't delay the execution of a convicted spy based on just a telegram signed with a name I've never heard of before. General Wallace might give you a pass to see him if he wants to.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BROUGH. WASHINGTON CITY, May 24, 1864.
GOVERNOR BROUGH, Columbus, Ohio:
Yours to Secretary of War [received] asking for something cheering. We have nothing bad from anywhere. I have just seen a despatch of Grant, of 11 P.M., May 23, on the North Anna and partly across it, which ends as follows: "Everything looks exceedingly favorable for us." We have nothing later from him.
Yours to the Secretary of War [received] asking for some good news. We don't have any bad reports from anywhere. I just saw a message from Grant, dated 11 P.M., May 23, on the North Anna and partly across it, which ends with: "Everything looks really positive for us." We don't have anything more recent from him.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May 25,1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of Potomac:
Mr. J. C. Swift wishes a pass from me to follow your army to pick up rags and cast-off clothing. I will give it to him if you say so, otherwise not.
Mr. J. C. Swift wants a pass from me to follow your army to collect rags and discarded clothing. I will give it to him if you agree, otherwise I won't.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
["No job to big or too small" for this president—not even a request from a Rag Picker. D.W.]
["No job too big or too small" for this president—not even a request from a Rag Picker. D.W.]
MEMORANDUM CONCERNING THE TRANSPORTATION OF THE NEW YORK NAVAL BRIGADE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May 26, 1864.
WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
To Whom It May Concern:
I am again pressed with the claim of Mr. Marshall O. Roberts, for transportation of what was called the Naval Brigade from New York to Fortress Monroe. This force was a special organization got up by one Bartlett, in pretended pursuance of written authority from me, but in fact, pursuing the authority in scarcely anything whatever. The credit given him by Mr. Roberts, was given in the teeth of the express declaration that the Government would not be responsible for the class of expenses to which it belonged. After all some part of the transportation became useful to the Government, and equitably should be paid for; but I have neither time nor means to ascertain this equitable amount, or any appropriation to pay it with if ascertained. If the Quartermaster at New York can ascertain what would compensate for so much of the transportation as did result usefully to the Government, it might be a step towards reaching justice. I write this from memory, but I believe it is substantially correct.
I'm once again dealing with the claim from Mr. Marshall O. Roberts for the transportation of what was called the Naval Brigade from New York to Fortress Monroe. This group was a special organization created by someone named Bartlett, who claimed he had written authorization from me, but in reality, he was hardly following any legitimate authority. The credit Mr. Roberts gave him was against the clear statement that the Government would not cover these types of expenses. Nevertheless, some portion of the transportation ended up being useful for the Government and should fairly be compensated; however, I don't have the time or resources to determine this fair amount or any funding to pay it if I do find it. If the Quartermaster in New York can figure out what would be a fair amount for the part of the transportation that was actually beneficial to the Government, it could be a step towards achieving some justice. I'm writing this from memory, but I think it's mostly accurate.
TO P. A. CONKLING AND OTHERS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION,
WASHINGTON, June 3, 1864.
WASHINGTON, June 3, 1864.
HON. F. A. CONKLING AND OTHERS.
HON. F. A. CONKLING AND OTHERS.
GENTLEMEN:—Your letter, inviting me to be present at a mass meeting of loyal citizens, to be held at New York on the 4th instant, for the purpose of expressing gratitude to Lieutenant-General Grant for his signal services, was received yesterday. It is impossible for me to attend. I approve, nevertheless, of whatever may tend to strengthen and sustain General Grant and the noble armies now under his direction. My previous high estimate of General Grant has been maintained and heightened by what has occurred in the remarkable campaign he is now conducting, while the magnitude and difficulty of the task before him does not prove less than I expected. He and his brave soldiers are now in the midst of their great trial, and I trust that at your meeting you will so shape your good words that they may turn to men and guns, moving to his and their support.
GENTLEMEN:—I received your letter inviting me to attend a mass meeting of loyal citizens in New York on the 4th of this month to express gratitude to Lieutenant-General Grant for his exceptional services. Unfortunately, I can't be there. However, I fully support anything that strengthens and supports General Grant and the brave armies under his command. My earlier high regard for General Grant has only increased due to the impressive campaign he is leading, and the scale and challenges of his task are exactly what I expected. He and his courageous soldiers are currently facing their great trial, and I hope that at your meeting you will formulate your inspiring words in a way that they can translate into support, both in manpower and resources, for him and his troops.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
INDORSEMENT ON A LETTER TOUCHING THE REPUBLICAN NATIONAL CONVENTION.
JUNE 5, 1864.
(Indorsement.)
(Endorsement.)
Swett is unquestionably all right. Mr. Holt is a good man, but I had not heard or thought of him for Vice-President. Wish not to interfere about Vice-President. Cannot interfere about platform. Convention must judge for itself.
Swett is definitely a good choice. Mr. Holt is a decent guy, but I hadn't considered him for Vice-President. I don't want to get involved in the Vice-President discussion. I can't influence the platform either. The convention has to make its own decisions.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL MEADE. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, June 6, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL MEADE, Army of the Potomac:
Private James McCarthy, of the One-hundred and fortieth New York Volunteers, is here under sentence to the Dry Tortugas for an attempt to desert. His friends appeal to me and if his colonel and you consent, I will send him to his regiment. Please answer.
Private James McCarthy, of the 140th New York Volunteers, is currently sentenced to the Dry Tortugas for attempting to desert. His friends are appealing to me, and if his colonel and you agree, I'll send him back to his regiment. Please respond.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. ROSECRANS. WASHINGTON, June 8, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL ROSECRANS, St. Louis, Missouri:
Yours of to-day received. I am unable to conceive how a message can be less safe by the express than by a staff-officer. If you send a verbal message, the messenger is one additional person let into the secret.
Your message from today has been received. I can’t understand how a message can be less secure by using an express courier than by a staff officer. If you send a verbal message, that adds one more person to know the secret.
REPLY TO THE COMMITTEE NOTIFYING PRESIDENT LINCOLN OF HIS RENOMINATION,
JUNE 9, 1864.
Mr. CHAIRMAN AND GENTLEMEN OF THE COMMITTEE:
Mr. Chairman and members of the committee:
I will neither conceal my gratification nor restrain the expression of my gratitude that the Union people, through their convention, in their continued effort to save and advance the nation, have deemed me not unworthy to remain in my present position. I know no reason to doubt that I shall accept the nomination tendered; and yet perhaps I should not declare definitely before reading and considering what is called the platform. I will say now, however, I approve the declaration in favor of so amending the Constitution as to prohibit slavery throughout the nation. When the people in revolt, with a hundred days of explicit notice that they could within those days resume their allegiance without the overthrow of their institution, and that they could not so resume it afterward, elected to stand out, such amendment of the Constitution as now proposed became a fitting and necessary conclusion to the final success of the Union cause. Such alone can meet and cover all cavils. Now the unconditional Union men, North and South, perceive its importance and embrace it. In the joint names of Liberty and Union, let us labor to give it legal form and practical effect.
I won’t hide my happiness or hold back my gratitude that the Union members, through their convention, in their ongoing effort to save and improve the nation, have deemed me worthy to stay in my current position. I have no reason to think I won’t accept the nomination offered to me; however, maybe I shouldn’t commit fully until I read and consider what’s called the platform. I will say now, though, that I support the idea of amending the Constitution to prohibit slavery across the nation. When people in rebellion were given a hundred days of clear notice that they could return to their allegiance without dismantling their institution, and that they could not do so afterward, they chose to stand firm. This proposed amendment to the Constitution has become a fitting and necessary outcome for the ultimate success of the Union cause. This alone can address and resolve all objections. Now, the unconditional Union supporters, both North and South, understand its significance and support it. In the combined names of Liberty and Union, let us work to make it a reality in law and practice.
PLATFORM OF THE UNION NATIONAL CONVENTION HELD IN BALTIMORE, MD., JUNE 7
AND 8, 1864.
AND 8, 1864.
1. Resolved, That it is the highest duty of every American citizen to maintain against all their enemies the integrity of the Union and the paramount authority of the Constitution and laws of the United States; and that, laying aside all differences of political opinion, we pledge ourselves, as Union men, animated by a common sentiment and aiming at a common object, to do everything in our power to aid the Government in quelling by force of arms the rebellion now raging against its authority, and in bringing to the punishment due to their crimes the rebels and traitors arrayed against it.
1. Resolved, That it is the highest duty of every American citizen to defend the integrity of the Union and the supreme authority of the Constitution and laws of the United States against all enemies; and that, setting aside all political differences, we commit ourselves, as supporters of the Union, united by a shared purpose and striving for a common goal, to do everything we can to help the Government suppress the rebellion currently challenging its authority and to punish the rebels and traitors opposing it.
2. Resolved, That we approve the determination of the Government of the United States not to compromise with rebels, or to offer them any terms of peace, except such as may be based upon an unconditional surrender of their hostility and a return to their just allegiance to the Constitution and laws of the United States, and that we call upon the Government to maintain this position, and to prosecute the war with the utmost possible vigor to the complete suppression of the rebellion, in full reliance upon the self-sacrificing patriotism, the heroic valor, and the undying devotion of the American people to their Country and its free institutions.
2. Resolved, That we support the decision of the Government of the United States not to negotiate with rebels or offer them any peace terms, except those based on an unconditional surrender of their aggression and a return to their rightful allegiance to the Constitution and laws of the United States. We urge the Government to uphold this stance and to conduct the war with the greatest possible intensity until the rebellion is completely crushed, fully trusting in the selfless patriotism, heroic bravery, and unwavering commitment of the American people to their Country and its democratic values.
3. Resolved, That as slavery was the cause, and now constitutes the strength, of this rebellion, and as it must be, always and everywhere, hostile to the principles of republican government, justice and the national safety demand its utter and complete extirpation from the soil of the republic; and that while we uphold and maintain the acts and proclamations by which the Government, in its own defense, has aimed a death-blow at this gigantic evil, we are in favor, furthermore, of such an amendment to the Constitution, to be made by the people in conformity with its provisions, as shall terminate and forever prohibit the existence of slavery within the limits or the jurisdiction of the United States.
3. Resolved, That since slavery was the cause of this rebellion and is now its main support, and since it will always oppose the principles of republican government, justice and the safety of the nation require its complete and total removal from the land of the republic; and that while we support the actions and proclamations that the Government has made in its defense to strike a decisive blow against this great evil, we also advocate for an amendment to the Constitution, to be created by the people according to its provisions, that will end and permanently ban the existence of slavery within the boundaries or jurisdiction of the United States.
4. Resolved, That the thanks of the American people are due to the soldiers and sailors of the Army and Navy, who have periled their lives in defense of their country and in vindication of the honor of its flag; that the nation owes to them some permanent recognition of their patriotism and their valor, and ample and permanent provision for those of their survivors who have received disabling and honorable wounds in the service of the country; and that the memories of those who have fallen in its defense shall be held in grateful and everlasting remembrance.
4. Resolved, That the American people owe their gratitude to the soldiers and sailors of the Army and Navy, who have risked their lives to protect their country and uphold the honor of its flag; that the nation should provide them with lasting recognition for their patriotism and bravery, and adequate support for those survivors who have suffered serious and honorable injuries while serving the country; and that we will always remember those who have lost their lives defending it with gratitude and respect.
5. Resolved, That we approve and applaud the practical wisdom, the unselfish patriotism, and the unswerving fidelity to the Constitution and the principles of American liberty, with which Abraham Lincoln has discharged under circumstances of unparalleled difficulty the great duties and responsibilities of the Presidential office; that we approve and indorse as demanded by the emergency and essential to the preservation of the nation, and as within the provisions of the Constitution, the measures and acts which he has adopted to defend the nation against its open and secret foes; that we approve, especially, the Proclamation of Emancipation, and the employment as Union soldiers of men heretofore held in slavery; and that we have full confidence in his determination to carry these and all other constitutional measures essential to the salvation of the country into full and complete effect.
5. Resolved, That we commend and appreciate the practical wisdom, the selfless patriotism, and the unwavering loyalty to the Constitution and the principles of American freedom that Abraham Lincoln has shown while handling the immense duties and responsibilities of the Presidential office during incredibly challenging times; that we support and endorse, as the situation demands and essential for the nation's preservation, the actions and decisions he has taken to protect the country from its visible and hidden enemies; that we particularly support the Emancipation Proclamation and the enlistment of men who were previously enslaved as Union soldiers; and that we have complete confidence in his commitment to implement these and all other constitutional measures necessary for the country's survival effectively.
6. Resolved, That we deem it essential to the General welfare that harmony should prevail in the national councils, and we regard as worthy of public confidence and official trust those only who cordially indorse the principles proclaimed in these resolutions, and which should characterize the administration of the Government.
6. Resolved, That we believe it's crucial for the overall wellbeing that unity exists in national discussions, and we consider only those who fully support the principles outlined in these resolutions to be deserving of public trust and official responsibility, which should define the government's administration.
7. Resolved, That the Government owes to all men employed in its armies, without regard to distinction of color, the full protection of the laws of war, and that any violation of these laws, or of the usages of civilized nations in time of war, by the rebels now in arms, should be made the subject of prompt and full redress.
7. Resolved, That the Government owes full protection under the laws of war to all men serving in its armies, regardless of their color, and that any violations of these laws, or the practices of civilized nations during wartime, by the rebels currently in arms should be addressed quickly and completely.
8. Resolved, That foreign immigration, which in the past has added so much to the wealth, development of resources, and increase of power to this nation, the asylum of the oppressed of all nations, should be fostered and encouraged by a liberal and just policy.
8. Resolved, That foreign immigration, which has historically contributed so much to the wealth, resource development, and power of this nation—the refuge for the oppressed from all countries—should be supported and promoted through a fair and generous policy.
9. Resolved, That we are in favor of the speedy construction of the railroad to the Pacific coast.
9. Resolved, That we support the quick build of the railroad to the Pacific coast.
10. Resolved, That the national faith, pledged for the redemption of the public debt, must be kept inviolate, and that for this purpose we recommend economy and rigid responsibility in the public expenditures, and a vigorous and just system of taxation: and that it is the duty of every loyal State to sustain the credit and promote the use of the national currency.
10. Resolved, That the national commitment to pay off the public debt must be upheld, and to achieve this, we recommend careful spending and strict accountability in public finances, along with an effective and fair tax system: and that it is the responsibility of every loyal State to support the credit and encourage the use of the national currency.
11. Resolved, That we approve the position taken by the Government that the people of the United States can never regard with indifference the attempt of any European power to overthrow by force or to supplant by fraud the institutions of any republican government on the Western Continent, and that they will view with extreme jealousy, as menacing to the peace and independence of their own country, the efforts of any such power to obtain new footholds for monarchical governments, sustained by foreign military force, in near proximity to the United States.
11. Resolved, That we support the Government's stance that the people of the United States can never ignore any attempt by a European power to violently overthrow or deceitfully replace the institutions of any democratic government on the Western Continent. Furthermore, they will be extremely wary, seeing it as a threat to the peace and independence of their own country, of any such power trying to establish new footholds for monarchies backed by foreign military force close to the United States.
REPLY TO A DELEGATION FROM THE NATIONAL UNION LEAGUE,
JUNE 9, 1864.
GENTLEMEN—I can only say in response to the remarks of your chairman, that I am very grateful for the renewed confidence which has been accorded to me, both by the convention and by the National League. I am not insensible at all to the personal compliment there is in this, yet I do not allow myself to believe that any but a small portion of it is to be appropriated as a personal compliment to me. The convention and the nation, I am assured, are alike animated by a higher view of the interests of the country, for the present and the great future, and the part I am entitled to appropriate as a compliment is only that part which I may lay hold of as being the opinion of the convention and of the League, that I am not entirely unworthy to be intrusted with the place I have occupied for the last three years. I have not permitted myself, gentlemen, to conclude that I am the best man in the country; but I am reminded in this connection of a story of an old Dutch farmer, who remarked to a companion once that "it was not best to swap horses when crossing a stream."
GENTLEMEN—I can only respond to your chairman's remarks by saying how grateful I am for the renewed trust you have placed in me, both from the convention and the National League. I truly appreciate the personal compliment, but I don’t believe that much of it is solely directed at me. I am assured that both the convention and the nation are motivated by a greater concern for the interests of our country, both now and in the future. The part I can accept as a compliment is simply that the convention and the League think I am somewhat deserving of the position I have held for the past three years. I haven’t convinced myself, gentlemen, that I am the best person for this role; however, this reminds me of a story about an old Dutch farmer who once told a friend, "it’s not a good idea to swap horses while crossing a stream."
REPLY TO A DELEGATION FROM OHIO,
JUNE 9, 1864.
GENTLEMEN:—I am very much obliged to you for this compliment. I have just been saying, and will repeat it, that the hardest of all speeches I have to answer is a serenade. I never know what to say on these occasions. I suppose that you have done me this kindness in connection with the action of the Baltimore convention, which has recently taken place, and with which, of course, I am very well satisfied. What we want still more than Baltimore conventions, or Presidential elections, is success under General Grant. I propose that you constantly bear in mind that the support you owe to the brave officers and soldiers in the field is of the very first importance, and we should therefore bend all our energies to that point. Now without detaining you any longer, I propose that you help me to close up what I am now saying with three rousing cheers for General Grant and the officers and soldiers under his command.
GENTLEMEN:—I really appreciate this compliment. I’ve just been saying, and I’ll say it again, that the hardest speeches for me to respond to are serenades. I never know what to say in these moments. I assume you’ve done me this favor in light of the recent Baltimore convention, which I’m quite pleased with. What we need even more than Baltimore conventions or presidential elections is success with General Grant. I suggest you always remember that supporting the brave officers and soldiers in the field is incredibly important, and we should focus all our energy on that. Now, without keeping you any longer, I propose we wrap up this speech with three loud cheers for General Grant and the officers and soldiers under his command.
ADDRESS TO THE ENVOY FROM THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS,
JUNE 11, 1864.
SIR:—In every light in which the State of the Hawaiian Islands can be contemplated, it is an object of profound interest for the United States. Virtually it was once a colony. It is now a near and intimate neighbor. It is a haven of shelter and refreshment for our merchants, fishermen, seamen, and other citizens, when on their lawful occasions they are navigating the eastern seas and oceans. Its people are free, and its laws, language, and religion are largely the fruit of our own teaching and example. The distinguished part which you, Mr. Minister, have acted in the history of that interesting country, is well known here. It gives me pleasure to assure you of my sincere desire to do what I can to render now your sojourn in the United States agreeable to yourself, satisfactory to your sovereign, and beneficial to the Hawaiian people.
SIR:—From every angle, the State of the Hawaiian Islands is of great interest to the United States. It was once essentially a colony, and now it is a close neighbor. It serves as a refuge and a refreshing stop for our merchants, fishermen, sailors, and other citizens while they travel the eastern seas and oceans on their legitimate business. Its people are free, and its laws, language, and religion largely reflect our own teachings and examples. The important role you, Mr. Minister, have played in the history of that fascinating country is well recognized here. I am pleased to express my genuine desire to make your time in the United States enjoyable for you, fulfilling for your sovereign, and advantageous for the Hawaiian people.
REMARKS TO AN OHIO REGIMENT,
JUNE 11, 1864.
Soldiers! I understand you have just come from Ohio; come to help us in this the nation's day of trial, and also of its hopes. I thank you for your promptness in responding to the call for troops. Your services were never needed more than now. I know not where you are going. You may stay here and take the places of those who will be sent to the front, or you may go there yourselves. Wherever you go I know you will do your best. Again I thank you. Good-by.
Soldiers! I know you just came from Ohio to help us on this challenging day for our nation, filled with both trials and hopes. I appreciate your quick response to the call for troops. Your support has never been more essential than it is right now. I don’t know where you’re headed. You can stay here and take over for those being sent to the front lines, or you might go there yourselves. Wherever you go, I’m sure you’ll give it your all. Thanks again. Goodbye.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL L. THOMAS. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, June 13,
1864.
1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL THOMAS, Louisville, Kentucky:
MAJOR-GENERAL THOMAS, Louisville, KY:
Complaint is made to me that in the vicinity of Henderson, our militia is seizing negroes and carrying them off without their own consent, and according to no rules whatever, except those of absolute violence. I wish you would look into this and inform me, and see that the making soldiers of negroes is done according to the rules you are acting upon, so that unnecessary provocation and irritation be avoided.
I’ve been told that around Henderson, our militia is forcibly taking Black people and removing them without their permission, doing so by sheer violence and without any rules. I need you to investigate this and let me know what's going on. Make sure that if Black people are being made into soldiers, it's done according to the guidelines you're following, so we can avoid unnecessary conflict and resentment.
TELEGRAM TO THOMAS WEBSTER. WASHINGTON, D. C., June 13, 1864.
THOMAS WEBSTER, Philadelphia:
Will try to leave here Wednesday afternoon, say at 4 P.M., remain till Thursday afternoon and then return. This subject to events.
Will try to leave here on Wednesday afternoon, around 4 PM, stay until Thursday afternoon, and then come back. This depends on what happens.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, June 15, 1864. 7 A.M.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, Headquarters Army of the Potomac:
I have just received your dispatch of 1 P.M. yesterday. I begin to see it: you will succeed. God bless you all.
I just got your message from 1 P.M. yesterday. I'm starting to understand it: you will succeed. God bless you all.
ADDRESS AT A SANITARY FAIR IN PHILADELPHIA,
JUNE 16, 1864.
I suppose that this toast is intended to open the way for me to say something. War at the best is terrible, and this of ours in its magnitude and duration is one of the most terrible the world has ever known. It has deranged business totally in many places, and perhaps in all. It has destroyed property, destroyed life, and ruined homes. It has produced a national debt and a degree of taxation unprecedented in the history of this country. It has caused mourning among us until the heavens may almost be said to be hung in black. And yet it continues. It has had accompaniments not before known in the history of the world. I mean the Sanitary and Christian Commissions, with their labors for the relief of the soldiers, and the Volunteer Refreshment Saloons, understood better by those who hear me than by myself, and these fairs, first begun at Chicago and next held in Boston, Cincinnati, and other cities. The motive and object that lie at the bottom of them are worthy of the most that we can do for the soldier who goes to fight the battles of his country. From the fair and tender hand of women is much, very much, done for the soldier, continually reminding him of the care and thought for him at home. The knowledge that he is not forgotten is grateful to his heart. Another view of these institutions is worthy of thought. They are voluntary contributions, giving proof that the national resources are not at all exhausted, and that the national patriotism will sustain us through all. It is a pertinent question, When is this war to end? I do not wish to name the day when it will end, lest the end should not come at the given time. We accepted this war, and did not begin it. We accepted it for an object, and when that object is accomplished the war will end, and I hope to God that it will never end until that object is accomplished. We are going through with our task, so far as I am concerned, if it takes us three years longer. I have not been in the habit of making predictions, but I am almost tempted now to hazard one. I will. It is, that Grant is this evening in a position, with Meade and Hancock, of Pennsylvania, whence he can never be dislodged by the enemy until Richmond is taken. If I shall discover that General Grant may be greatly facilitated in the capture of Richmond by rapidly pouring to him a large number of armed men at the briefest notice, will you go? Will you march on with him? [Cries of "Yes, yes."] Then I shall call upon you when it is necessary.
I guess this toast is meant to give me a chance to say something. War, even at its best, is awful, and this one, because of its scale and length, is one of the worst the world has ever seen. It has completely disrupted business in many places, maybe everywhere. It has destroyed property, taken lives, and shattered homes. It has created a national debt and an unprecedented level of taxes in our country’s history. It has brought so much sorrow that it feels like the sky itself is draped in black. And yet, it goes on. There have been support efforts like the Sanitary and Christian Commissions, helping soldiers, and the Volunteer Refreshment Saloons, which those of you here understand far better than I do, along with fairs that started in Chicago and were later held in Boston, Cincinnati, and other cities. The purpose behind these efforts is deserving of everything we can do for the soldiers fighting for our country. Women have done so much, reminding soldiers that they are cared for and thought of back home. Knowing he isn’t forgotten brings comfort to his heart. Another perspective on these efforts deserves consideration. They are voluntary donations, showing that our national resources are far from depleted, and that our patriotism will carry us through. A relevant question is, when will this war end? I don’t want to specify a day for the end, in case it doesn’t come when expected. We took on this war; we didn’t start it. We took it on for a purpose, and when that purpose is fulfilled, the war will end. I sincerely hope it doesn’t end until that purpose is achieved. We will see this through, even if it takes us three more years. I usually don’t make predictions, but I’m tempted to make one now. Here it is: Grant is currently in a position with Meade and Hancock in Pennsylvania that cannot be taken by the enemy until Richmond falls. If I discover that General Grant could be greatly helped in capturing Richmond by quickly sending a large number of armed men his way, will you go? Will you march with him? [Cries of "Yes, yes."] Then I will call on you when the time is right.
TO ATTORNEY-GENERAL BATES.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, Jun. 24, 1864
HONORABLE ATTORNEY-GENERAL.
HONORABLE ATTORNEY GENERAL.
SIR:—By authority of the Constitution, and moved thereto by the fourth section of the act of Congress, entitled "An act making appropriations for the support of the army for the year ending the thirtieth of June, eighteen hundred and sixty-five, and for other purposes, approved June is, 1864," I require your opinion in writing as to what pay, bounty, and clothing are allowed by law to persons of color who were free on the nineteenth day of April, 1861, and who have been enlisted and mustered into the military service of the United States between the month of December, 1862, and the sixteenth of June, 1864.
SIR:—Under the authority of the Constitution and based on the fourth section of the Congressional act titled "An act making appropriations for the support of the army for the year ending June 30, 1865, and for other purposes, approved June 15, 1864," I need your written opinion about the pay, bounty, and clothing that the law allows for people of color who were free on April 19, 1861, and who have been enlisted and mustered into the military service of the United States between December 1862 and June 16, 1864.
Please answer as you would do, on my requirement, if the act of June 15, 1864, had not been passed, and I will so use your opinion as to satisfy that act.
Please respond as you would if the act of June 15, 1864, hadn’t been passed, and I’ll use your opinion to comply with that act.
Your obedient servant,
Your loyal servant,
TELEGRAM TO MRS. LINCOLN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, June 24, 1864.
MRS. A. LINCOLN, Boston, Massachusetts:
Mrs. A. Lincoln, Boston, MA:
All well and very warm. Tad and I have been to General Grant's army. Returned yesterday safe and sound.
All is well and pretty warm. Tad and I visited General Grant's army. We got back yesterday safe and sound.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. ROSECRANS. WASHINGTON, June 24, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL ROSECRANS, St. Louis, Missouri:
Complaint is made to me that General Brown does not do his best to suppress bushwhackers. Please ascertain and report to me.
I've received complaints that General Brown isn't doing enough to deal with bushwhackers. Please find out the situation and let me know.
LETTER ACCEPTING THE NOMINATION FOR PRESIDENT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, June 27, 1864.
HON. WILLIAM DENNISON AND OTHERS, a Committee of the Union National Convention.
HON. WILLIAM DENNISON AND OTHERS, a Committee of the Union National Convention.
GENTLEMEN:—Your letter of the 14th inst.., formally notifying me that I have been nominated by the convention you represent for the Presidency of the United States for four years from the 4th of March next, has been received. The nomination is gratefully accepted, as the resolutions of the convention, called the platform, are heartily approved.
GENTLEMEN:—I received your letter dated the 14th of this month, officially informing me that I have been nominated by the convention you represent for the presidency of the United States for four years starting on March 4th. I am grateful to accept the nomination, as I wholeheartedly agree with the resolutions of the convention, known as the platform.
While the resolution in regard to the supplanting of republican government upon the Western Continent is fully concurred in, there might be misunderstanding were I not to say that the position of the Government in relation to the action of France in Mexico, as assumed through the State Department and indorsed by the convention among the measures and acts of the Executive, will be faithfully maintained so long as the state of facts shall leave that position pertinent and applicable.
While I fully agree with the decision about replacing republican government on the Western Continent, I need to clarify that the Government's stance regarding France's actions in Mexico, as taken by the State Department and supported by the convention among the Executive's measures and actions, will be upheld as long as the circumstances make that stance relevant and appropriate.
I am especially gratified that the soldier and seaman were not forgotten by the convention, as they forever must and will be remembered by the grateful country for whose salvation they devote their lives.
I’m really glad that the soldier and sailor weren’t overlooked by the convention, as they will always be remembered by the thankful nation they dedicate their lives to saving.
Thanking you for the kind and complimentary terms in which you have communicated the nomination and other proceedings of the convention, I subscribe myself,
Thank you for the kind and flattering way you communicated the nomination and other actions of the convention. I remain,
Your obedient servant,
Your loyal servant,
TO GENERAL P. STEELE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, June 29, 1864
MAJOR-GENERAL STEELE:
MAJ. GEN. STEELE:
I understand that Congress declines to admit to seats the persons sent as Senators and Representatives from Arkansas. These persons apprehend that, in consequence, you may not support the new State government there as you otherwise would. My wish is that you give that government and the people there the same support and protection that you would if the members had been admitted, because in no event, nor in any view of the case, can this do any harm, while it will be the best you can do toward suppressing the rebellion.
I understand that Congress has chosen not to seat the individuals sent as Senators and Representatives from Arkansas. These individuals fear that, as a result, you may not support the new State government there as you otherwise would. I hope you give that government and the people there the same support and protection you would if the members had been admitted, because in any case, this won't cause any harm, and it will be the best you can do to help suppress the rebellion.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL GRANT. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, June 29, 1864.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point:
Dr. Worster wishes to visit you with a view of getting your permission to introduce into the army "Harmon's Sandal Sock." Shall I give him a pass for that object?
Dr. Worster wants to visit you to get your permission to introduce "Harmon's Sandal Sock" into the army. Should I give him a pass for that?
TELEGRAM TO DAVID TOD.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., June 30, 1864.
HON. DAVID TOD, Youngstown, Ohio: I have nominated you to be Secretary of the Treasury, in place of Governor Chase, who has resigned. Please come without a moment's delay.
HON. DAVID TOD, Youngstown, Ohio: I have nominated you to be Secretary of the Treasury, replacing Governor Chase, who has resigned. Please come as soon as possible.
TO J. L. SCRIPPS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, July 4, 1864.
To JOHN L. SCRIPPS, ESQ.
To John L. Scripps, Esq.
DEAR SIR:—Complaint is made to me that you are using your official power to defeat Mr. Arnold's nomination to Congress. I am well satisfied with Mr. Arnold as a member of Congress, and I do not know that the man who might supplant him would be as satisfactory; but the correct principle, I think, is that all our friends should have absolute freedom of choice among our friends. My wish, therefore, is that you will do just as you think fit with your own suffrage in the case, and not constrain any of your subordinates to [do] other than [as] he thinks fit with his. This is precisely the rule I inculcated and adhered to on my part, when a certain other nomination, now recently made, was being canvassed for.
DEAR SIR:—I’ve received complaints that you are using your official authority to block Mr. Arnold's nomination to Congress. I am quite satisfied with Mr. Arnold as a member of Congress, and I’m not sure that whoever might replace him would be as good; however, I believe the right approach is to let all our friends have complete freedom to choose among our associates. Therefore, I hope you will act as you see fit regarding your own vote in this matter and not pressure any of your subordinates to do anything other than what they believe is right. This is exactly the principle I promoted and followed when another nomination was being considered recently.
Yours very truly,
Sincerely,
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
TELEGRAM TO J. W. GARRETT. WASHINGTON, July 5, 1864.
TELEGRAM TO J. W. GARRETT. WASHINGTON, July 5, 1864.
J. W. GARRETT, President [B. & 0. R. R.], Camden Station:
J. W. GARRETT, President [B. & O. R. R.], Camden Station:
You say telegraphic communication is re-established with Sandy Hook. Well, what does Sandy Hook say about operations of enemy and of Sigel during to-day?
You say telegraphic communication has been re-established with Sandy Hook. Well, what does Sandy Hook report about the enemy's operations and Sigel's actions today?
FROM SECRETARY STANTON TO GOVERNOR SEYMOUR.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, July 5, 1864.
HIS EXCELLENCY HORATIO SEYMOUR, Governor of New York, Albany:
HIS EXCELLENCY HORATIO SEYMOUR, Governor of New York, Albany:
The President directs me to inform you that a rebel force, variously estimated at from fifteen to twenty thousand men, have invaded the State of Maryland, and have taken Martinsburg and Harper's Ferry, and are threatening other points; that the public safety requires him to call upon the State executives for a militia force to repel this invasion. He therefore directs me to call on you for a militia force of twelve thousand men from your State to serve not more than one hundred days, and to request that you will with the utmost despatch forward the troops to Washington by rail or steamboat as may be most expeditious.
The President has asked me to let you know that a rebel group, estimated to be between fifteen and twenty thousand men, has invaded the State of Maryland. They have taken control of Martinsburg and Harper's Ferry and are threatening other areas. Due to concerns for public safety, he needs to ask the state leaders for a militia force to counter this invasion. Therefore, he is requesting that you provide a militia force of twelve thousand men from your state, to serve for no more than one hundred days, and to send the troops to Washington as quickly as possible by rail or steamboat, whichever is faster.
Please favor me with an answer at your earliest convenience.
Please let me know your answer as soon as you can.
EDWIN M. STANTON,
EDWIN M. STANTON,
Secretary of War.
Secretary of Defense.
PROCLAMATION SUSPENDING THE WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS,
JULY 5, 1864.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES:
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas, by a proclamation which was issued on the 15th day of April, 1861, the President of the United States announced and declared that the laws of the United States had been for some time past, and then were, opposed and the execution thereof obstructed in certain States therein mentioned, by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings or by the power vested in the marshals by law; and
Whereas, in a proclamation issued on April 15, 1861, the President of the United States announced that the laws of the United States had been, for some time, opposed and their enforcement obstructed in certain mentioned states, by groups too powerful to be handled through regular judicial processes or by the authority granted to marshals by law; and
Whereas, immediately after the issuing of the said proclamation the land and naval forces of the United States were put into activity to suppress the said insurrections and rebellion; and
Whereas, right after the proclamation was issued, the land and naval forces of the United States were activated to put an end to the insurrections and rebellion; and
Whereas, the Congress of the United States, by an act approved on the third day of March, 1863, did enact that during the said rebellion the President of the United States, whenever in his judgment the public safety may require it, is authorized to suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus in any case throughout the United States, or any part thereof; and
Whereas, the Congress of the United States, through an act approved on March 3, 1863, enacted that during the rebellion, the President of the United States is authorized to suspend the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus in any case across the United States, or any part of it, whenever he believes public safety requires it; and
Whereas, the said insurrection and rebellion still continue, endangering the existence of the Constitution and Government of the United States; and
Whereas, the ongoing uprising and rebellion still pose a threat to the existence of the Constitution and Government of the United States; and
Whereas, the military forces of the United States are now actively engaged in suppressing the said insurrection and rebellion in various parts of the States where the said rebellion has been successful in obstructing the laws and public authorities, especially in the States of Virginia and Georgia; and
Whereas the U.S. military is currently working to suppress the insurrection and rebellion in different areas of the states where this rebellion has been able to disrupt the laws and public authorities, particularly in Virginia and Georgia; and
Whereas, on the fifteenth day of September last, the President of the United States duly issued his proclamation, wherein he declared that the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus should be suspended throughout the United States, in Cases whereby the authority of the President of the United States, the military, naval, and civil officers of the United States, or any of them, hold persons under their command or in their custody, either as prisoners of war, spies, or aiders or abettors of the enemy, or officers, soldiers, or seamen enrolled or drafted, or mustered, or enlisted in, or belonging to the land or naval forces of the United States, or as deserters therefrom, or otherwise amenable to military law, or the rules and articles of war, or the rules and regulations prescribed for the military and naval service by authority of the President of the United States, or for resisting a draft, or for any other offence against the military or naval service; and
On September 15th of last year, the President of the United States officially issued a proclamation stating that the right to habeas corpus would be suspended across the United States in cases where the President, military, naval, and civil officers of the United States, or any of them, hold individuals under their command or custody. This includes those held as prisoners of war, spies, or supporters of the enemy, as well as officers, soldiers, or sailors who are enrolled, drafted, mustered, or enlisted in the land or naval forces of the United States, those who have deserted, or anyone else subject to military law, the rules and articles of war, or regulations set for military and naval service by the President, or for resisting a draft, or any other offense against military or naval service; and
Whereas, many citizens of the State of Kentucky have joined the forces of the insurgents, who have on several occasions entered the said State of Kentucky in large force and not without aid and comfort furnished by disaffected and disloyal citizens of the United States residing therein, have not only greatly disturbed the public peace but have overborne the civil authorities and made flagrant civil war, destroying property and life in various parts of the State; and
Whereas many citizens of Kentucky have allied themselves with the insurgents, who have repeatedly invaded Kentucky in large numbers, often receiving support from disloyal citizens of the United States living there, they have not only greatly disrupted public order but have also overwhelmed civil authorities and created blatant civil war, destroying property and taking lives in various parts of the state; and
Whereas, it has been made known to the President of the United States, by the officers commanding the National armies, that combinations have been formed in the said State of Kentucky, with a purpose of inciting the rebel forces to renew the said operations of civil war within the said State, and thereby to embarrass the United States armies now operating in the said States of Virginia and Georgia, and even to endanger their safety.
Whereas, it has come to the attention of the President of the United States, by the officers in charge of the National armies, that groups have formed in the state of Kentucky, aiming to provoke the rebel forces to restart the civil war in that state, and thereby complicate the efforts of the United States armies currently active in Virginia and Georgia, and even put their safety at risk.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and laws, do hereby declare that in my judgment the public safety especially requires that the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus so proclaimed in the said proclamation of the 15th of September, 1863, be made effectual and be duly enforced in and throughout the said State of Kentucky, and that martial law be for the present declared therein. I do therefore hereby require of the military officers of the said State that the privilege of the habeas corpus be effectually suspended within the said State, according to the aforesaid proclamation, and that martial law be established therein to take effect from the date of this proclamation, the said suspension and establishment of martial law to continue until this proclamation shall be revoked or modified, but not beyond the period when the said rebellion shall have been suppressed or come to an end. And I do hereby require and command, as well as military officers, all civil officers and authorities existing or found within the said State of Kentucky, to take notice of this proclamation and to give full effect to the same. The martial laws herein proclaimed and the things in that respect herein ordered will not be deemed or taken to interfere with the holding of lawful elections, or with the proceedings of the constitutional Legislature of Kentucky, or with the administration of justice in the courts of law existing therein between citizens of the United States in suits or proceedings which do not affect the military operations or the constituted authorities of the government of the United States.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, using the authority granted to me by the Constitution and laws, declare that, in my opinion, public safety especially requires that the suspension of the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus, as stated in the proclamation of September 15, 1863, be made effective and enforced throughout the State of Kentucky, and that martial law be declared there for the time being. I therefore require the military officers in the State to effectively suspend the privilege of habeas corpus, in accordance with the aforementioned proclamation, and to establish martial law starting from the date of this proclamation. This suspension and the establishment of martial law will continue until this proclamation is revoked or modified, but not beyond the time when the rebellion has been suppressed or has ended. I further require and command all military officers, as well as all civil officers and authorities present in the State of Kentucky, to acknowledge this proclamation and to fully implement it. The martial laws declared here and the orders related to them will not be seen as interfering with the conduct of lawful elections, with the actions of the constitutional Legislature of Kentucky, or with the administration of justice in local courts between citizens of the United States in cases or proceedings that do not impact military operations or the established authorities of the United States government.
In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.
In witness whereof, I have set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be attached.
Done at the City of Washington this 5th day of July, in the year of our Lord 1864, and of the independence of the United States the eighty-eighth.
Done in Washington, D.C., on this 5th day of July, in the year of our Lord 1864, and the eighty-eighth year of American independence.
A. LINCOLN. By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
A. LINCOLN. By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
PROCLAMATION FOR A DAY OF PRAYER, JULY 7, 1864.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas, the Senate and House of Representatives at their last session adopted a concurrent resolution, which was approved on the second day of July instant, and which `was in the words following, namely:
Whereas, the Senate and House of Representatives in their last session adopted a concurrent resolution, which was approved on July 2nd of this year, and which was in the following words:
That the President of the United States be requested to appoint a day of humiliation and prayer by the people of the United States, that he request his constitutional advisers at the head of the Executive Departments to unite with him, as Chief Magistrate of the nation, at the City of Washington, and the members of Congress, and all magistrates, all civil, military, and naval officers, all soldiers, sailors, and marines, with all loyal and law-abiding people, to convene at their usual places of worship, or wherever they may be, to confess and to repent of their manifold sins, to implore the compassion and forgiveness of the Almighty, that, if consistent with His will, the existing rebellion may be speedily suppressed, and the supremacy of the Constitution and laws of the United States may be established throughout all the States; to implore Him, as the Supreme Ruler of the world, not to destroy us as a people, nor suffer us to be destroyed by the hostility or connivance of other nations, or by obstinate adhesion to our own counsels which may be in conflict with His eternal, purposes, and to implore Him to enlighten the mind of the nation to know and do His will, humbly believing that it is in accordance with His will that our place should be maintained as a united people among the family of nations; to implore Him to grant to our armed defenders, and the masses of the people, that courage, power of resistance, and endurance necessary to secure that result; to implore Him in His infinite goodness to soften the hearts, enlighten the minds, and quicken the conscience of those in rebellion, that they may lay down their arms, and speedily return to their allegiance to the United States, that they may not be utterly destroyed, that the effusion of blood may be stayed, and that unity and fraternity may be restored, and peace established throughout all our borders.
That the President of the United States should call for a day of humility and prayer for the people of the United States, asking his constitutional advisers at the head of the Executive Departments to join him, as the leader of the nation, in the City of Washington. He will invite the members of Congress, all magistrates, civil, military, and naval officers, as well as all soldiers, sailors, and marines, and all loyal and law-abiding citizens, to gather at their usual places of worship, or wherever they may be, to confess and repent for their many sins. They will seek the compassion and forgiveness of the Almighty, asking that if it aligns with His will, the current rebellion be quickly put down, and that the supremacy of the Constitution and laws of the United States be restored throughout all the states. They will call upon Him, as the Supreme Ruler of the world, not to let us be destroyed as a people, nor allow us to be harmed by the hostility or collusion of other nations, or by stubborn adherence to our own decisions if they conflict with His eternal purposes. They will also pray for guidance for the nation to understand and follow His will, sincerely believing that it is His will for us to stand as a united people among the family of nations. They will implore Him to grant our armed defenders and the general public the courage, resilience, and endurance needed to achieve this outcome. They will ask Him, in His infinite goodness, to soften the hearts, enlighten the minds, and awaken the consciences of those in rebellion, so they may lay down their arms and quickly return to their allegiance to the United States, avoiding utter destruction, halting the loss of life, and restoring unity and brotherhood, thus establishing peace across all our borders.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the `United States, cordially concurring with the Congress of the United States, in the penitential and pious sentiments expressed in the aforesaid resolutions, and heartily approving of the devotional design and purpose thereof, do hereby appoint the first Thursday of August next to be observed by the people of the United States as a day of national humiliation and prayer.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, fully agreeing with Congress, in the remorseful and respectful feelings expressed in the resolutions mentioned above, and wholeheartedly supporting the intended purpose behind them, do hereby designate the first Thursday of August next to be recognized by the people of the United States as a day of national humility and prayer.
I do hereby further invite and request the heads of the Executive Departments of this Government, together with all legislators, all judges and magistrates, and all other persons exercising authority in the land, whether civil, military, or naval, and all soldiers, seamen, and marines in the national service, and all other loyal and law-abiding people of the United States, to assemble in their preferred places of public worship on that day, and there to render to the Almighty and merciful Ruler of the Universe, such homage and such confessions, and to offer to Him such supplications as the Congress of the United States have, in their aforesaid resolution, so solemnly, so earnestly, and so reverently recommended.
I would like to invite and ask the heads of the Executive Departments of this Government, along with all legislators, judges, magistrates, and everyone else in authority across the country—whether civil, military, or naval, as well as all soldiers, seamen, and marines serving the nation, and all other loyal, law-abiding citizens of the United States—to gather in their chosen places of public worship on that day. They should offer their respect and confessions to the Almighty and merciful Ruler of the Universe, and provide Him with the prayers and supplications that the Congress of the United States has respectfully and earnestly recommended in their previous resolution.
In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed. Done at the city of Washington this seventh day of July, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-four, and of the independence of the United States the eighty-ninth.
In witness whereof, I have signed my name and attached the seal of the United States. Done in the city of Washington on the seventh day of July, in the year twenty eighteen sixty-four, and the eighty-ninth year of American independence.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By President William H. Seward, Secretary of State.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING A BILL "TO GUARANTEE TO CERTAIN STATES,
WHOSE GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN USURPED OR OVERTHROWN, A REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT," AND CONCERNING RECONSTRUCTION,
WHOSE GOVERNMENTS HAVE BEEN TAKEN OVER OR DEMOLISHED, A REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT," AND ABOUT REBUILDING,
JULY 8, 1864. BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES:
JULY 8, 1864. FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas at the late session Congress passed a bill "to guarantee to certain states whose governments have been usurped or overthrown a republican form of government," a copy of which is hereunto annexed; and
Whereas at the recent session, Congress passed a bill "to ensure that certain states whose governments have been taken over or overthrown receive a republican form of government," a copy of which is attached here.
Whereas, the said bill was presented to the President of the United States for his approval less than one hour before the sine die adjournment of said session, and was not signed by him; and
Whereas, the bill was presented to the President of the United States for his approval less than one hour before the final adjournment of that session, and he did not sign it; and
Whereas the said bill contains, among other things, a plan for restoring the States in rebellion to their proper practical relation in the Union, which plan expresses the sense of Congress upon that subject, and which plan it is now thought fit to lay before the people for their consideration:
Whereas the bill includes, among other things, a plan to restore the states that are rebelling to their appropriate practical relationship within the Union, which plan reflects Congress's perspective on the matter, and which plan is now deemed appropriate to present to the people for their consideration:
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, do proclaim, declare, and make known that while I am (as I was in December last, when, by proclamation, I propounded a plan for restoration) unprepared by a formal approval of this bill to be inflexibly committed to any single plan of restoration, and while I am also unprepared to declare that the free State constitutions and governments already adopted and installed in Arkansas and Louisiana shall be set aside and held for naught, thereby repelling and discouraging the loyal citizens who have set up the same as to further effort, or to declare a constitutional competency in Congress to abolish slavery in States, but am at the same time sincerely hoping and expecting that a constitutional amendment abolishing slavery throughout the nation may be adopted, nevertheless I am fully satisfied with the system for restoration contained in the bill as one very proper plan for the loyal people of any State choosing to adopt it, and that I am and at all times shall be prepared to give the Executive aid and assistance to any such people so soon as the military resistance to the United States shall have been suppressed in any such States and the people thereof shall have sufficiently returned to their obedience to the Constitution and the laws of the United States, in which cases militia-governors will be appointed with directions to proceed according to the bill.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, proclaim, declare, and announce that while I am (as I was last December when I proposed a restoration plan by proclamation) not ready to formally approve this bill and commit to any single restoration plan, and while I am also not ready to say that the free State constitutions and governments already established in Arkansas and Louisiana should be dismissed and disregarded—thus discouraging the loyal citizens who created them from making further efforts—or to claim that Congress has the constitutional authority to abolish slavery in the States, I sincerely hope and expect that a constitutional amendment ending slavery nationwide will be passed. Nevertheless, I am fully satisfied with the restoration system outlined in the bill as a proper plan for any loyal people in a State who choose to adopt it, and I am always ready to provide Executive support to any such people once military resistance to the United States has been suppressed in those States and the people have sufficiently returned to their obedience to the Constitution and the laws of the United States. In those cases, militia-governors will be appointed with instructions to proceed according to the bill.
In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed..............
In witness whereof, I have set my hand and affixed the seal of the United States here.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
TO HORACE GREELEY.
WASHINGTON, D. C., July 9, 1864
HON. HORACE GREELEY.
Hon. Horace Greeley.
DEAR SIR:—Your letter of the 7th, with inclosures, received.
DEAR SIR:—I received your letter from the 7th, along with the attachments.
If you can find any person, anywhere, professing to have any proposition of Jefferson Davis in writing, for peace, embracing the restoration of the Union and abandonment of slavery, whatever else it embraces, say to him he may come to me with you; and that if he really brings such proposition, he shall at the least have safe conduct with the paper (and without publicity, if he chooses) to the point where you shall have to meet him. The same if there be two or more persons.
If you can find anyone, anywhere, claiming to have a written proposal from Jefferson Davis for peace that includes restoring the Union and ending slavery, no matter what else it includes, tell him he can come to me with you. If he actually brings such a proposal, he will at least have safe passage with the document (and can keep it private if he wants) to the place where you need to meet him. The same goes for two or more people.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO J. W. GARRETT. WASHINGTON, D. C., July 9, 1864
J. W. GARRETT, Camden Station:
What have you heard about a battle at Monocacy to-day? We have nothing about it here except what you say.
What have you heard about the battle at Monocacy today? We don’t have any information here other than what you’ve mentioned.
TELEGRAM FROM GENERAL HALLECK TO GENERAL WALLACE.
WASHINGTON, July 9, 1864. 11.57 P.M.
MAJOR-GENERAL L. WALLACE, Commanding Middle Department:
MAJOR-GENERAL L. WALLACE, in charge of the Middle Department:
I am directed by the President to say that you will rally your forces and make every possible effort to retard the enemy's march on Baltimore.
I have been instructed by the President to tell you to gather your forces and do everything you can to slow down the enemy's advance on Baltimore.
H. W. HALLECK, Major-General and Chief of Staff.
H. W. HALLECK, Major General and Chief of Staff.
TELEGRAM TO T. SWAN AND OTHERS. WASHINGTON, D. C., July 10, 1864. 9.20
A.M.
AM
THOMAS SWAN AND OTHERS, Baltimore, Maryland:
THOMAS SWAN AND OTHERS, Baltimore, Maryland:
Yours of last night received. I have not a single soldier but whom is being disposed by the military for the best protection of all. By latest accounts the enemy is moving on Washington. They cannot fly to either place. Let us be vigilant, but keep cool. I hope neither Baltimore nor Washington will be sacked.
Your message from last night was received. I don’t have a single soldier that isn’t being arranged by the military for everyone's best protection. According to the latest reports, the enemy is advancing on Washington. They can’t escape to either location. Let’s stay alert, but remain calm. I hope neither Baltimore nor Washington will be looted.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON CITY, July TO, 1864.2 P.M.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
Your dispatch to General Halleck, referring to what I may think in the present emergency, is shown me. General Halleck says we have absolutely no force here fit to go to the field. He thinks that with the hundred-day men and invalids we have here we can defend Washington, and, scarcely, Baltimore. Besides these there are about eight thousand, not very reliable, under Howe, at Harper's Ferry with Hunter approaching that point very slowly, with what number I suppose you know better than I. Wallace, with some odds and ends, and part of what came up with Ricketts, was so badly beaten yesterday at Monocacy, that what is left can attempt no more than to defend Baltimore. What we shall get in from Pennsylvania and New York will scarcely be worth counting, I fear. Now, what I think is, that you should provide to retain your hold where you are, certainly, and bring the rest with you personally, and make a vigorous effort to destroy the enemy's forces in this vicinity. I think there is really a fair chance to do this, if the movement is prompt. This is what I think upon your suggestion, and is not an order.
I've received your message to General Halleck about my thoughts on the current situation. General Halleck says we have no troops here ready for the field. He believes that with the hundred-day soldiers and the injured we have, we can barely defend Washington, and just enough for Baltimore. In addition to these, there are about eight thousand troops under Howe at Harper's Ferry who aren't very reliable, and Hunter is slowly making his way toward that area, though I assume you know more about his numbers than I do. Wallace, along with some leftover troops and part of what came up with Ricketts, was badly defeated yesterday at Monocacy, leaving them barely able to defend Baltimore. I fear that any reinforcements from Pennsylvania and New York won't make much of a difference. I believe you should focus on holding your position where you are, and personally lead the rest to make a strong effort to defeat the enemy forces nearby. I genuinely think there's a reasonable chance to accomplish this if we act quickly. This is my opinion based on your suggestion, and it's not an order.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, July 11, 1864. 8 A.M.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
Yours of 10.30 P.M. yesterday received, and very satisfactory. The enemy will learn of Wright's arrival, and then the difficulty will be to unite Wright and Hunter south of the enemy before he will recross the Potomac. Some firing between Rockville and here now.
Your message from 10:30 PM yesterday has been received, and it's very satisfying. The enemy will find out about Wright's arrival, and then the challenge will be to bring together Wright and Hunter south of the enemy before he crosses back over the Potomac. There's some firing happening between Rockville and here now.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., July 12, 1864. 11.30
AM.
AM.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
LT. GEN. GRANT, City Point, VA:
Vague rumors have been reaching us for two or three days that Longstreet's corps is also on its way [to] this vicinity. Look out for its absence from your front.
Vague rumors have been coming in for the past couple of days that Longstreet's corps is also heading this way. Keep an eye out for its absence from your front.
TELEGRAM AND LETTER TO HORACE GREELEY. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, July
12, 1864.
December 12, 1864.
HON. HORACE GREELEY, New York:
Hon. Horace Greeley, New York:
I suppose you received my letter of the 9th. I have just received yours of the 13th, and am disappointed by it. I was not expecting you to send me a letter, but to bring me a man, or men. Mr. Hay goes to you with my answer to yours of the 13th.
I guess you got my letter from the 9th. I just got yours from the 13th, and I'm disappointed by it. I wasn't expecting a letter from you, but rather for you to bring me a man, or men. Mr. Hay is coming to you with my response to your letter from the 13th.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
[Carried by Major John Hay.]
[Carried by Major John Hay.]
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, JULY 15, 1864.
HON. HORACE GREELEY.
MY DEAR SIR:-Yours of the 13th is just received, and I am disappointed that you have not already reached here with those commissioners, if they would consent to come on being shown my letter to you of the 9th instant. Show that and this to them, and if they will come on the terms stated in the former, bring them. I not only intend a sincere effort for peace, but I intend that you shall be a personal witness that it is made.
MY DEAR SIR: I just received your letter from the 13th, and I'm disappointed that you haven't arrived here yet with those commissioners, assuming they would agree to come after seeing my letter to you from the 9th. Please show them that letter along with this one, and if they are willing to come on the terms stated earlier, bring them along. I am not only committed to making a genuine effort for peace, but I also want you to personally witness that it happens.
Yours truly,
Best regards,
SAFE CONDUCT FOR CLEMENT C. CLAY AND OTHERS,
JULY 16, 1864.
The President of the United States directs that the four persons whose names follow, to wit, HON. Clement C. Clay, HON. Jacob Thompson, Professor James P. Holcombe, George N. Sanders, shall have safe conduct to the city of Washington in company with the HON. HORACE GREELEY, and shall be exempt from arrest or annoyance of any kind from any officer of the United States during their journey to the said city of Washington.
The President of the United States instructs that the four people listed below—HON. Clement C. Clay, HON. Jacob Thompson, Professor James P. Holcombe, and George N. Sanders—are granted safe passage to the city of Washington along with HON. HORACE GREELEY. They will be exempt from arrest or any disturbances from any U.S. officer during their trip to Washington, D.C.
By order of the President: JOHN HAY, Major and Assistant Adjutant-General
By order of the President: JOHN HAY, Major and Assistant Adjutant-General
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. [WASHINGTON] July 17. 1864. 11.25 A.M.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
In your dispatch of yesterday to General Sherman, I find the following, to wit:
In your message yesterday to General Sherman, I see the following:
"I shall make a desperate effort to get a position here, which will hold the enemy without the necessity of so many men."
"I'll make a serious attempt to secure a position here that can hold off the enemy without needing so many soldiers."
Pressed as we are by lapse of time I am glad to hear you say this; and yet I do hope you may find a way that the effort shall not be desperate in the sense of great loss of life.
Pressed for time as we are, I’m glad to hear you say this; and yet, I really hope you can find a way to ensure that the effort isn’t desperate in the sense of causing a huge loss of life.
A. LINCOLN, President.
A. LINCOLN, President.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL D. HUNTER WASHINGTON JULY 17, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL HUNTER, Harper's Ferry, West Va.
Yours of this morning received. You misconceive. The order you complain of was only nominally mine, and was framed by those who really made it with no thought of making you a scapegoat. It seemed to be General Grant's wish that the forces under General Wright and those under you should join and drive at the enemy under General Wright. Wright had the larger part of the force, but you had the rank. It was thought that you would prefer Crook's commanding your part to your serving in person under Wright. That is all of it. General Grant wishes you to remain in command of the department, and I do not wish to order otherwise.
I received your message from this morning. You're misunderstanding the situation. The order you're upset about was only superficially mine and was crafted by those who actually put it together, without any intention of making you a scapegoat. It seemed like General Grant wanted the forces under General Wright and yours to combine and push against the enemy with General Wright in charge. Wright had more troops, but you held a higher rank. It was believed that you would rather have Crook lead your portion instead of serving directly under Wright. That's all there is to it. General Grant wants you to stay in charge of the department, and I don’t intend to change that.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, July 18, 1864. 11.25 A.M.
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERMAN, Chattahoochee River, Georgia:
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERMAN, Chattahoochee River, GA:
I have seen your despatches objecting to agents of Northern States opening recruiting stations near your camps. An act of Congress authorizes this, giving the appointment of agents to the States, and not to the Executive Government. It is not for the War Department, or myself, to restrain or modify the law, in its execution, further than actual necessity may require. To be candid, I was for the passage of the law, not apprehending at the time that it would produce such inconvenience to the armies in the field as you now cause me to fear. Many of the States were very anxious for it, and I hoped that, with their State bounties, and active exertions, they would get out substantial additions to our colored forces, which, unlike white recruits, help us where they come from, as well as where they go to. I still hope advantage from the law; and being a law, it must be treated as such by all of us. We here will do what we consistently can to save you from difficulties arising out of it. May I ask, therefore, that you will give your hearty co-operation.
I’ve seen your messages complaining about agents from Northern States setting up recruiting stations near your camps. There’s a law passed by Congress that allows this, giving the authority to the States to appoint agents, not to the Executive Government. It’s not up to the War Department, or me, to limit or change the law's execution, except where absolutely necessary. To be honest, I supported the passage of the law, not realizing at the time that it would create such issues for the armies in the field, which you’ve expressed concerns about. Many States were eager for it, and I hoped that, along with their State incentives and active efforts, they would manage to significantly boost our colored forces, who help us both where they’re from and where they’re sent. I still expect benefits from the law; and since it’s a law, we all need to treat it as such. We will do everything we can to help you avoid complications arising from it. Therefore, I kindly ask for your full cooperation.
ANNOUNCEMENT CONCERNING TERMS OF PEACE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION,
WASHINGTON, July 18, 1864.
WASHINGTON, July 18, 1864.
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
Any proposition which embraces the restoration of peace, the integrity of the whole Union, and the abandonment of slavery, and which comes by and with an authority that can control the armies now at war against the United States, will be received and considered by the Executive Government of the United States, and will be met by liberal terms on other substantial and collateral points; and the bearer or bearers thereof shall have safe conduct both ways.
Any proposal that includes restoring peace, maintaining the unity of the entire Union, and ending slavery, and comes from an authority that can command the armies currently fighting against the United States, will be accepted and considered by the Executive Government of the United States. It will be responded to with generous terms on other important and related matters; and the messenger or messengers will be granted safe passage both ways.
PROCLAMATION CALLING FOR FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND VOLUNTEERS,
JULY 18, 1864,
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas by the act approved July 4, 1864, entitled "An act further to regulate and provide for the enrolling and calling out the national forces and for other purposes," it is provided that the President of the United States may, "at his discretion, at any time hereafter, call for any number of men, as volunteers for the respective terms of one, two, and three years for military service," and "that in case the quota or any part thereof of any town, township, ward of a city, precinct, or election district, or of a county not so subdivided, shall not be filled within the space of fifty days after such call, then the President shall immediately order a draft for one year to fill such quota or any part thereof which may be unfilled;" and
Whereas, according to the act approved on July 4, 1864, titled "An act further to regulate and provide for the enrolling and calling out the national forces and for other purposes," it states that the President of the United States may, "at his discretion, at any future time, call for any number of volunteers for military service for periods of one, two, or three years," and "if the quota or any part of it from any town, township, city ward, precinct, or election district, or from a county that isn't subdivided, is not met within fifty days after such a call, then the President will immediately order a draft for one year to fill any unfilled quota or part thereof;" and
Whereas the new enrolment heretofore ordered is so far completed as that the aforementioned act of Congress may now be put in operation for recruiting and keeping up the strength of the armies in the field, for garrisons, and such military operations as may be required for the purpose of suppressing the rebellion and restoring the authority of the United States Government in the insurgent States:
Whereas the new enrollment that was previously ordered is now sufficiently completed so that the mentioned act of Congress can be implemented to recruit and maintain the strength of the armies in the field, for garrisons, and for any military operations needed to suppress the rebellion and restore the authority of the United States Government in the insurgent States:
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, do issue this my last call for five hundred thousand volunteers for the military service: Provided, nevertheless, That this call shall be reduced by all credits which may be established under section eight of the aforesaid act on account of persons who have entered the naval service during the present rebellion and by credits for men furnished to the military service in excess of calls heretofore made. Volunteers will be accepted under this call for one, two, or three years, as they may elect, and will be entitled to the bounty provided by the law for the period of services for which they enlist.
Now, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, am making my final call for five hundred thousand volunteers for military service. However, this number will be lowered by any credits established under section eight of the above-mentioned act for individuals who have joined the naval service during the current rebellion, as well as credits for soldiers provided to the military service beyond previous calls. Volunteers can enlist for one, two, or three years, depending on their choice, and will receive the bounty specified by law for the length of service they commit to.
And I hereby proclaim, order, and direct that immediately after the 5th day of September, 1864, being fifty days from the date of this call, a draft for troops to serve for one year shall be had in every town, township, ward of a city, precinct, or election district, or county not so subdivided, to fill the quota which shall be assigned to it under this call or any part thereof which may be unfilled by volunteers on the said 5th day of September, 1864.
And I hereby announce, order, and direct that right after September 5th, 1864, which is fifty days from the date of this notice, a draft for troops to serve for one year will take place in every town, township, city ward, precinct, or election district, or in any county that isn’t subdivided, to meet the quota assigned to it under this notice or any portion that may still be unfilled by volunteers on September 5th, 1864.
In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.
In witness whereof, I have set my hand and affixed the seal of the United States.
Done at the City of Washington, this 18th day of July, A.D. 1864, and of the independence of the United States the eighty-ninth.
Done at the City of Washington, this 18th day of July, 1864, and of the independence of the United States the eighty-ninth.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, July 20, 1864. 4.30 p.m.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
LT. GEN. GRANT, City Point, VA:
Yours of yesterday, about a call for three hundred thousand, is received. I suppose you had not seen the call for five hundred thousand, made the day before, and which, I suppose, covers the case. Always glad to have your suggestions.
I got your message from yesterday about the call for three hundred thousand. I assume you didn't see the call for five hundred thousand that was made the day before, which I think addresses the situation. I'm always happy to hear your suggestions.
TELEGRAM TO J. L. WRIGHT.
WAR DEPARTMENT, JULY. 20, 1864.
J. L. WRIGHT, Indianapolis, Ind.:
J.L. Wright, Indianapolis, IN:
All a mistake. Mr. Stanton has not resigned.
All a mistake. Mr. Stanton hasn't resigned.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL D. HUNTER. (Cipher.)
WAR DEPARTMENT, JULY 23, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL HUNTER, Harper's Ferry, West Va.
MAJOR-GENERAL HUNTER, Harper's Ferry, West Virginia.
Are you able to take care of the enemy, when he turns back upon you, as he probably will on finding that Wright has left?
Can you handle the enemy when he comes back at you, as he likely will once he realizes that Wright has gone?
TO GOVERNOR CURTIN, ENCLOSING A LETTER TO WILLIAM O. SNIDER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, July 25, 1864.
GOVERNOR CURTIN:
GOVERNOR CURTIN:
Herewith is the manuscript letter for the gentleman who sent me a cane through your hands. For my life I cannot make out his name; and therefore I cut it from his letter and pasted it on, as you see. I suppose [sic] will remember who he is, and I will thank you to forward him the letter. He dates his letter at Philadelphia.
Here’s the letter for the guy who sent me a cane through you. I can’t figure out his name, so I cut it out of his letter and pasted it on, like you see. I’m sure you’ll remember who he is, and I’d appreciate it if you could send him the letter. He dated his letter from Philadelphia.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
PRESENTATION OF A CANE
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, July 25, 1864.
WILLIAM O. SNIDER:
WILLIAM O. SNIDER:
The cane you did me the honor to present through Governor Curtin was duly placed in my hand by him. Please accept my thanks; and, at the same time, pardon me for not having sooner found time to tender them. Your obedient servant,
The cane you kindly presented to me through Governor Curtin was officially handed to me by him. Thank you very much; and at the same time, please forgive me for not thanking you sooner. Your obedient servant,
FROM JOHN HAY TO J. C. WELLING.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON. July 25, 1864.
J. C. WELLING, ESQ.
J.C. Welling, Esq.
SIR:—According to the request contained in your note, I have placed Mr. Gibson's letter of resignation in the hands of the President. He has read the letter, and says he accepts the resignation, as he will be glad to do with any other, which may be tendered, as this is, for the purpose of taking an attitude of hostility against him.
SIR:—As requested in your note, I have delivered Mr. Gibson's letter of resignation to the President. He has read it and says he accepts the resignation, and will be happy to do the same with any others submitted, as this is meant to show an opposing stance against him.
He says he was not aware that he was so much indebted to Mr. Gibson for having accepted the office at first, not remembering that he ever pressed him to do so, or that he gave it otherwise than as was usual, upon request made on behalf of Mr. Gibson.
He says he didn’t realize how much he owed Mr. Gibson for initially accepting the position, not recalling that he ever urged him to do it or that he did it in any way other than the usual practice of responding to a request made for Mr. Gibson.
He thanks Mr. Gibson for his acknowledgment that he has been treated with personal kindness and consideration, and says he knows of but two small drawbacks upon Mr. Gibson's right to still receive such treatment, one of which is that he never could learn of his giving much attention to the duties of his office, and the other is this studied attempt of Mr. Gibson's to stab him.
He thanks Mr. Gibson for recognizing that he's been treated with personal kindness and consideration, and mentions he knows of only two minor drawbacks to Mr. Gibson's right to continue receiving such treatment. One is that he could never tell if Mr. Gibson paid much attention to his job duties, and the other is Mr. Gibson's intentional attempt to undermine him.
I am very truly,
I am sincerely,
Your obedient servant,
Your loyal servant,
TO COLONEL, FIRST N. Y. VETERAN CAVALRY.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, JULY 25, 1864.
Thomas Connor, a private in the First Veteran New York Cavalry, is now imprisoned at hard labor for desertion. If the Colonel of said Regiment will say in writing on this sheets that he is willing to receive him back to the Regiment, I will pardon, and send him.
Thomas Connor, a private in the First Veteran New York Cavalry, is currently serving hard labor for desertion. If the Colonel of that Regiment will provide in writing on this sheet that he is willing to take him back into the Regiment, I will grant a pardon and send him back.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN.
WASHINGTON, July 26, 1864. 2.30 P.M.
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERMAN, near Atlanta:
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERMAN, close to Atlanta:
I have just seen yours complaining of the appointment of Hovey and Osterhaus. The point you make is unquestionably a good one, and yet please hear a word from us. My recollection is that both General Grant and yourself recommended both H [ovey] and O [sterhaus] for promotion, and these, with other strong recommendations, drew committals from us which we could neither honorably or safely disregard. We blamed H [ovey] for coming away in the manner in which he did, but he knew he had apparent reason to feel disappointed and mortified, and we felt it was not best to crush one who certainly had been a good soldier. As to [Osterhaus], we did not know of his leaving at the time we made the appointment, and do not now know the terms on which he left. Not to have appointed him, as the case appeared to us at the time, would have been almost, if not quite, a violation of our word. The word was given on what we thought was high merit and somewhat on his nationality. I beg you to believe we do not act in a spirit of disregarding merit. We expect to await your programme for further changes and promotions in your army. My profoundest thanks to you and your whole army for the present campaign so far.
I just saw your complaint about the appointments of Hovey and Osterhaus. You make a valid point, but I’d like to share our perspective. As I recall, both General Grant and you recommended Hovey and Osterhaus for promotion, and those strong recommendations led us to commit to their appointments, which we couldn't ignore without compromising our integrity. We criticized Hovey for leaving the way he did, but he had reason to feel disappointed and embarrassed, and we thought it was best not to undermine someone who had been a good soldier. Regarding Osterhaus, we were unaware of his departure when we made the appointment, and we still don’t know the circumstances of his leaving. Not appointing him at that time would have felt like a breach of our word. The decision was based on what we believed to be his high merit and somewhat on his nationality. Please understand that we are not dismissing merit in our actions. We look forward to your plan for further changes and promotions in your army. My deepest thanks to you and your entire army for the progress made in this campaign so far.
FROM SECRETARY STANTON TO GENERAL HALLECK.
WASHINGTON CITY, July 27, 1864
MAJOR-GENERAL HALLECK, Chief of Staff of the Army:
MAJOR-GENERAL HALLECK, Chief of Staff of the Army:
GENERAL:—Lieutenant-General Grant having signified that, owing to the difficulties and delay of communication between his headquarters and Washington, it is necessary that in the present emergency military orders must be issued directly from Washington, the President directs me to instruct you that all the military operations for the defense of the Middle Department, the Department of the Susquehanna, the Department of Washington, and the Department of West Virginia, and all the forces in those departments, are placed under your general command, and that you will be expected to take all military measures necessary for defense against any attack of the enemy and for his capture and destruction. You will issue from time to time such orders to the commanders of the respective departments and to the military authorities therein as may be proper.
GENERAL:—Lieutenant-General Grant has indicated that, due to communication challenges and delays between his headquarters and Washington, it's necessary for military orders to be issued directly from Washington during this urgent situation. The President has asked me to inform you that all military operations for the defense of the Middle Department, the Department of the Susquehanna, the Department of Washington, and the Department of West Virginia, as well as all forces in those departments, are under your overall command. You are expected to take all necessary military actions to defend against any enemy attacks and to capture and eliminate the threat. You will periodically issue appropriate orders to the commanders of the respective departments and to the military authorities there.
Your obedient servant,
Your loyal servant,
EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR JOHNSON. WASHINGTON, July 27, 1864.
GOVERNOR JOHNSON, Nashville, Tennessee:
Yours in relation to General A. C. Gillam just received. Will look after the matter to-day.
Your message regarding General A. C. Gillam has been received. I'll take care of it today.
I also received yours about General Carl Schurz. I appreciate him certainly, as highly as you do; but you can never know until you have the trial, how difficult it is to find a place for an officer of so high rank when there is no place seeking him.
I also got your message about General Carl Schurz. I definitely appreciate him as much as you do, but you can never really know how challenging it is to find a position for an officer of such high rank when there isn’t a spot available for him.
TO Mrs. ANNE WILLIAMSON,
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, July 29, 1864.
Mrs. ANNE WILLIAMSON.
Ms. Anne Williamson.
MADAM:—The plaid you send me is just now placed in my hands. I thank you for that pretty and useful present, but still more for those good wishes for myself and our country, which prompted you to present it.
MADAM:—The plaid you sent me just arrived. I appreciate that lovely and practical gift, but even more, I thank you for your kind wishes for myself and our country that inspired you to give it.
Your obedient servant,
Your devoted servant,
A. LINCOLN. INDORSEMENT, AUGUST 3, 1864.
A. LINCOLN. ENDORSEMENT, AUGUST 3, 1864.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON CITY, August 2, 1864.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, August 2, 1864.
MR. PRESIDENT:—This note will introduce to you Mr. Schley of Baltimore, who desires to appeal to you for the revocation of an order of General Hunter, removing some persons, citizens of Frederick, beyond his lines, and imprisoning others. This Department has no information of the reasons or proofs on which General Hunter acts, and I do not therefore feel at liberty to suspend or interfere with his action except under your direction.
MR. PRESIDENT:—This note introduces Mr. Schley from Baltimore, who wants to ask you to overturn an order from General Hunter that removes some citizens from Frederick beyond his lines and imprisons others. This Department doesn’t have any information about the reasons or evidence behind General Hunter’s actions, so I don’t feel authorized to pause or interfere with what he’s doing unless you direct me to.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
[Indorsement.]
[Endorsement.]
August 3, 1864.
August 3, 1864.
The Secretary of War will suspend the order of General Hunter mentioned within, until further order and direct him to send to the Department a brief report of what is known against each one proposed to be dealt with.
The Secretary of War will put the order from General Hunter on hold until further notice and instruct him to send a brief report to the Department outlining what is known about each individual proposed to be addressed.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U, S. GRANT.
(Cipher.)
WASHINGTON, D. C.. August 3, 1864
WASHINGTON, D.C., August 3, 1864
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
LT. GEN. GRANT, City Point, VA:
I have seen your despatch in which you say, "I want Sheridan put in command of all the troops in the field, with instructions to put himself south of the enemy, and follow him to the death. Wherever the enemy goes, let our troops go also."
I’ve read your message where you say, "I want Sheridan to take command of all the troops in the field, with orders to position himself south of the enemy and pursue them relentlessly. Wherever the enemy goes, let our troops follow."
This, I think, is exactly right as to how our forces should move; but please look over the despatches you may have received from here, ever since you made that order, and discover, if you can, that there is any idea in the head of any one here of "putting our army south of the enemy," or of following him to the "death," in any direction. I repeat to you, it will neither be done nor attempted, unless you watch it every day and hour, and force it.
This, I believe, is exactly how our forces should operate; however, please review the messages you may have received from here since you issued that order, and see if you can find any indication that anyone here is considering "moving our army south of the enemy," or chasing him to "the death," in any direction. I want to emphasize, it won't happen or even be attempted unless you monitor it constantly and push for it.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
[Here the President was mistaken in thinking that Sherman, Sheridan, and Grant had the same inability of most of his previous general officers. No one needed to watch Grant or Sherman or Sheridan, they only needed to get out of their way. D.W.]
[Here the President was wrong in thinking that Sherman, Sheridan, and Grant had the same limitations as most of his previous generals. No one needed to supervise Grant, Sherman, or Sheridan; they just needed to stay out of their way. D.W.]
TELEGRAM TO HORACE GREELEY.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, August 6, 1864
HON. HORACE GREELEY, New York:
Hon. Horace Greeley, New York:
Yours to Major Hay about publication of our correspondence received. With the suppression of a few passages in your letters in regard to which I think you and I would not disagree, I should be glad of the publication. Please come over and see me.
Yours to Major Hay about the publication of our correspondence received. With the removal of a few parts in your letters that I believe we would both agree on, I’d be happy for the publication. Please come over and see me.
TELEGRAM TO HORACE GREELEY.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, August 8, 1864
HON. HORACE GREELEY, New York:
Hon. Horace Greeley, New York:
I telegraphed you Saturday. Did you receive the despatch? Please answer.
I texted you on Saturday. Did you get the message? Please reply.
ON DISLOYAL FAMILY MEMBER
TO GENERAL S. O. BURBRIDGE.
WASHINGTON, D. C., August 8, 1864
WASHINGTON, D.C., August 8, 1864
MAJOR-GENERAL BURBRIDGE, Lexington, Ky.:
MAJOR GENERAL BURBRIDGE, Lexington, KY:
Last December Mrs. Emily T. Helm, half-sister of Mrs. Lincoln, and widow of the rebel general, Ben Hardin Helm, stopped here on her way from Georgia to Kentucky, and I gave her a paper, as I remember, to protect her against the mere fact of her being General Helm's widow. I hear a rumor to-day that you recently sought to arrest her, but were prevented by her presenting the paper from me. I do not intend to protect her against the consequences of disloyal words or acts, spoken or done by her since her return to Kentucky, and if the paper given her by me can be construed to give her protection for such words and acts, it is hereby revoked pro tanto. Deal with her for current conduct just as you would with any other.
Last December, Mrs. Emily T. Helm, Mrs. Lincoln's half-sister and widow of the Confederate general Ben Hardin Helm, stopped here on her way from Georgia to Kentucky. I remember giving her a document to protect her simply because she is General Helm's widow. I heard a rumor today that you recently tried to arrest her but were stopped when she showed the document I gave her. I don’t intend to protect her from the consequences of any disloyal statements or actions she has made since returning to Kentucky. If the document I provided her can be interpreted as giving her protection for such statements and actions, it is hereby revoked to that extent. Treat her for her current behavior just like you would anyone else.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
WASHINGTON, D. C., August 14, 1864. 1.30 P.M.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, VA:
The Secretary of War and I concur that you had better confer with General Lee, and stipulate for a mutual discontinuance of house-burning and other destruction of private property. The time and manner of conference and particulars of stipulation we leave, on our part, to your convenience and judgment.
The Secretary of War and I agree that it would be best for you to talk with General Lee and arrange to stop burning houses and other destruction of private property. We will leave the timing, method of the meeting, and details of the agreement to your discretion and judgment.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., August 15,1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERMAN, near Atlanta, Ga.:
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERMAN, near Atlanta, GA:
If the Government should purchase, on its own account, cotton northward of you, and on the line of your communications, would it be an inconvenience to you, or detriment to the military service, for it to come to the north on the railroad?
If the government were to buy cotton north of you, along your line of communication, would it be a hassle for you or a setback for the military if it were transported north on the railroad?
INTERVIEW WITH JOHN T. MILLS,
AUGUST [15?], 1864.
"Mr. President," said Governor Randall, "why can't you seek seclusion, and play hermit for a fortnight? It would reinvigorate you."
"Mr. President," Governor Randall said, "why don't you take some time away and play hermit for two weeks? It would refresh you."
"Ah," said the President, "two or three weeks would do me no good. I cannot fly from my thoughts—my solicitude for this great country follows me wherever I go. I do not think it is personal vanity or ambition, though I am not free from these infirmities, but I cannot but feel that the weal or woe of this great nation will be decided in November. There is no program offered by any wing of the Democratic party but that must result in the permanent destruction of the Union."
"Ah," said the President, "taking two or three weeks off wouldn't help me. I can't escape my thoughts—my concern for this great country follows me wherever I go. I don't think it's just personal pride or ambition, although I'm not free from those weaknesses, but I can't shake the feeling that the fate of this great nation will be decided in November. There's no plan from any part of the Democratic party that won't lead to the permanent destruction of the Union."
"But, Mr. President, General McClellan is in favor of crushing out this rebellion by force. He will be the Chicago candidate."
"But, Mr. President, General McClellan wants to put an end to this rebellion by using force. He will be the candidate from Chicago."
"Sir, the slightest knowledge of arithmetic will prove to any man that the rebel armies cannot be destroyed by Democratic strategy. It would sacrifice all the white men of the North to do it. There are now in the service of the United States nearly one hundred and fifty thousand able-bodied colored men, most of them under arms, defending and acquiring Union territory. The Democratic strategy demands that these forces be disbanded, and that the masters be conciliated by restoring them to slavery. The black men who now assist Union prisoners to escape are to be converted into our enemies, in the vain hope of gaining the good-will of their masters. We shall have to fight two nations instead of one.
"Sir, even a basic understanding of math shows that the rebel armies can’t be defeated with Democratic strategies. That would endanger all the white men in the North. Right now, there are almost one hundred and fifty thousand capable Black men serving in the United States military, most of them actively fighting to defend and expand Union territory. The Democratic strategy calls for these forces to be disbanded and for their former owners to be appeased by restoring them to slavery. The Black men who currently help Union soldiers escape would be turned into our enemies in a futile attempt to win over their masters. We would end up fighting two nations instead of just one."
"You cannot conciliate the South if you guarantee to them ultimate success; and the experience of the present war proves their success is inevitable if you fling the compulsory labor of millions of black men into their side of the scale. Will you give our enemies such military advantages as insure success, and then depend on coaxing, flattery, and concession to get them back into the Union? Abandon all the posts now garrisoned by black men, take one hundred and fifty thousand men from our side and put them in the battle-field or corn-field against us, and we would be compelled to abandon the war in three weeks.
"You can’t bring the South back into harmony if you give them a guarantee of ultimate success; and the current war shows that their success is unavoidable if you throw the forced labor of millions of Black men in their favor. Are you going to give our enemies such military advantages that ensure their success, and then rely on sweet talk, flattery, and concessions to bring them back into the Union? If you pull all the troops currently stationed by Black men, take one hundred and fifty thousand troops from our side and put them on the battlefield or in the fields against us, we’d have to quit the war in three weeks."
"We have to hold territory in inclement and sickly places; where are the Democrats to do this? It was a free fight, and the field was open to the war Democrats to put down this rebellion by fighting against both master and slave, long before the present policy was inaugurated.
"We need to maintain control in harsh and unhealthy areas; where can the Democrats do this? It was a fair battle, and the opportunity was there for the war Democrats to suppress this rebellion by fighting against both the oppressor and the oppressed, long before the current approach was established."
"There have been men base enough to propose to me to return to slavery the black warriors of Port Hudson and Olustee, and thus win the respect of the masters they fought. Should I do so, I should deserve to be damned in time and eternity. Come what will, I will keep my faith with friend and foe. My enemies pretend I am now carrying on this war for the sole purpose of abolition. So long as I am President, it shall be carried on for the sole purpose of restoring the Union. But no human power can subdue this rebellion without the use of the emancipation policy, and every other policy calculated to weaken the moral and physical forces of the rebellion.
"There have been people so low as to suggest that I send the Black soldiers from Port Hudson and Olustee back into slavery to gain the respect of their former masters. If I were to do that, I would deserve to be cursed now and forever. No matter what happens, I will remain loyal to both friends and enemies. My opponents claim that I’m fighting this war solely to end slavery. As long as I am President, it will be fought with the primary goal of restoring the Union. However, no human power can suppress this rebellion without adopting the emancipation policy and any other strategies meant to weaken the moral and physical strength of the rebellion."
"Freedom has given us one hundred and fifty thousand men, raised on Southern soil. It will give us more yet. Just so much it has subtracted from the enemy, and, instead of alienating the South, there are now evidences of a fraternal feeling growing up between our men and the rank and file of the rebel soldiers. Let my enemies prove to the country that the destruction of slavery is not necessary to a restoration of the Union. I will abide the issue."
"Freedom has given us 150,000 men from the South. It will give us even more. That's just as many as it's taken away from the enemy, and instead of driving a wedge between us and the South, we’re seeing signs of brotherhood building between our troops and the common soldiers of the Confederacy. Let my opponents show the nation that ending slavery isn't essential to restoring the Union. I'm ready to face the outcome."
ENDORSEMENT OF APPLICATION FOR EMPLOYMENT, AUGUST 15, 1864.
I am always for the man who wishes to work; and I shall be glad for this man to get suitable employment at Cavalry Depot, or elsewhere.
I’m always supportive of someone who wants to work, and I’ll be happy for this person to find suitable employment at the Cavalry Depot or anywhere else.
TO H. J. RAYMOND.
EXECUTIVE MANSION WASHINGTON, August 15, 1864
HON. HENRY J. RAYMOND.
Hon. Henry J. Raymond.
MY DEAR SIR:—I have proposed to Mr. Greeley that the Niagara correspondence be published, suppressing only the parts of his letters over which the red pencil is drawn in the copy which I herewith send. He declines giving his consent to the publication of his letters unless these parts be published with the rest. I have concluded that it is better for me to submit, for the time, to the consequences of the false position in which I consider he has placed me, than to subject the country to the consequences of publishing these discouraging and injurious parts. I send you this, and the accompanying copy, not for publication, but merely to explain to you, and that you may preserve them until their proper time shall come.
MY DEAR SIR:—I suggested to Mr. Greeley that we publish the Niagara correspondence, only holding back the sections of his letters that are marked with a red pencil in the copy I’m sending you. He refuses to allow his letters to be published unless those sections are included as well. I’ve decided it’s better for me to deal with the fallout of what I think is an unfair situation he’s put me in, rather than risk the negative impact on the country that would come from publishing those discouraging and damaging parts. I’m sending you this and the attached copy, not for publication, but simply to keep you informed and so you can hold onto them until the right time comes.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, August 17, 1864.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
LT. GEN. GRANT, City Point, VA:
I have seen your despatch expressing your unwillingness to break your hold where you are. Neither am I willing. Hold on with a bulldog grip, and chew and choke as much as possible.
I’ve read your message saying you’re not ready to let go of your position. I feel the same way. Hold on tightly, and fight as hard as you can.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING COMMERCIAL REGULATIONS, AUGUST 18, 1864.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas the act of Congress of the 28th of September, 1850, entitled "An act to create additional collection districts in the State of California, and to change the existing districts therein, and to modify the existing collection districts in the United States," extends to merchandise warehoused under bond the privilege of being exported to the British North American provinces adjoining the United States, in the manner prescribed in the act of Congress of the 3d of March, 1845, which designates certain frontier ports through which merchandise may be exported, and further provides "that such other ports, situated on the frontiers of the United States adjoining the British North American provinces, as may hereafter be found expedient, may have extended to them the like privileges, on the recommendation of the Secretary of the Treasury, and proclamation duly made by the President of the United States, specially designating the ports to which the aforesaid privileges are to be extended."
Whereas the act of Congress from September 28, 1850, titled "An act to create additional collection districts in the State of California, and to change the existing districts therein, and to modify the existing collection districts in the United States," allows for merchandise stored under bond to be exported to the British North American provinces next to the United States, as outlined in the act of Congress from March 3, 1845, which specifies certain border ports through which merchandise can be exported, and further states "that any other ports located on the borders of the United States adjacent to the British North American provinces, which may be deemed necessary in the future, can also be granted the same privileges upon the recommendation of the Secretary of the Treasury, along with a proclamation made by the President of the United States specifically naming the ports that will receive these privileges."
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America, in accordance with the recommendation of the Secretary of the Treasury, do hereby declare and proclaim that the port of Newport, in the State of Vermont, is and shall be entitled to all the privileges in regard to the exportation of merchandise in bond to the British North American provinces adjoining the United States, which are extended to the ports enumerated in the seventh section of the act of Congress of the 3d of March, 1845, aforesaid, from and after the date of this proclamation.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America, following the recommendation of the Secretary of the Treasury, declare and announce that the port of Newport, in the State of Vermont, is and will be entitled to all the privileges related to exporting bonded merchandise to the British North American provinces next to the United States, just like the ports listed in the seventh section of the act of Congress dated March 3, 1845, starting from the date of this proclamation.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed. Done at the city of Washington, this eighteenth day of August, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-four, and of the independence of the United States of America, the eighty-ninth.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed. Done at the city of Washington, this eighteenth day of August, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-four, and of the independence of the United States of America, the eighty-ninth.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
INDORSEMENT CONCERNING AN EXCHANGE OF PRISONERS, AUGUST 18, 1864.
If General Hitchcock can effect a special exchange of Thomas D. Armesy, now under conviction as a spy, or something of the sort, and in prison at for Major Nathan Goff, made a prisoner of war, and now in prison at Richmond, let it be done.
If General Hitchcock can arrange a special exchange of Thomas D. Armesy, who is currently convicted as a spy and imprisoned at , for Major Nathan Goff, who is a prisoner of war and now in prison at Richmond, then let it happen.
ADDRESS TO THE 164TH OHIO REGIMENT,
AUGUST 18, 1864.
SOLDIERS:—You are about to return to your homes and your friends, after having, as I learn, performed in camp a comparatively short term of duty in this great contest. I am greatly obliged to you, and to all who have come forward at the call of their country. I wish it might be more generally and universally understood what the country is now engaged in. We have, as all will agree, a free government, where every man has a right to be equal with every other man. In this great struggle, this form of government and every form of human right is endangered if our enemies succeed. There is more involved in this contest than is realized by every one. There is involved in this struggle, the question whether your children and my children shall enjoy the privileges we have enjoyed. I say this, in order to impress upon you, if you are not already so impressed, that no small matter should divert us from our great purpose.
SOLDIERS:—You’re about to go back to your homes and friends after serving in camp for what I understand was a relatively short period in this major conflict. I’m really grateful to you and to everyone who stepped up when their country called. I wish more people understood what our nation is currently fighting for. We have, as everyone agrees, a free government where every person has the right to be equal to every other person. In this significant struggle, this form of government and all forms of human rights are at risk if our enemies win. There’s more at stake in this fight than many realize. This battle involves whether your children and my children will enjoy the same freedoms we’ve had. I mention this to emphasize, if you’re not already aware, that no minor issue should distract us from our important mission.
There may be some inequalities in the practical application of our system. It is fair that each man shall pay taxes in exact proportion to the value of his property; but if we should wait, before collecting a tax, to adjust the taxes upon each man in exact proportion with every other man, we should never collect any tax at all. There may be mistakes made sometimes; and things may be done wrong, while the officers of the Government do all they can to prevent mistakes. But I beg of you, as citizens of this great Republic, not to let your minds be carried off from the great work we have before us. This struggle is too large for you to be diverted from it by any small matter. When you return to your homes, rise up to the height of a generation of men worthy of a free government, and we will carry out the great work we have commenced. I return to you my sincere thanks, soldiers, for the honor you have done me this afternoon.
There might be some inconsistencies in how our system works in practice. It's fair for everyone to pay taxes based on the value of their property, but if we wait to collect taxes until we can adjust them perfectly for each person compared to others, we'll never collect any taxes at all. Sometimes mistakes happen, and things can be done incorrectly, even when the government officials do their best to avoid errors. But I ask you, as citizens of this great Republic, not to let minor issues distract you from the important work ahead of us. This struggle is too significant for you to be sidetracked by small matters. When you go back home, step up to be part of a generation that deserves a free government, and together we will accomplish the important work we've started. I sincerely thank you, soldiers, for the honor you've shown me this afternoon.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BUTLER. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., August
20, 1864.
20, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Bermuda Hundred, Va.:
MAJ. GEN. BUTLER, Bermuda Hundred, Va.:
Please allow Judge Snead to go to his family on Eastern Shore, or give me some good reason why not.
Please let Judge Snead go to his family on the Eastern Shore, or give me a good reason not to.
ADDRESS TO THE 166TH OHIO REGIMENT,
AUGUST 22, 1864.
SOLDIERS—I suppose you are going home to see your families and friends. For the services you have done in this great struggle in which we are engaged, I present you sincere thanks for myself and the country.
SOLDIERS—I guess you’re heading home to see your families and friends. For the contributions you’ve made in this significant struggle we’re involved in, I extend my heartfelt thanks on behalf of myself and the nation.
I almost always feel inclined, when I say anything to soldiers, to impress upon them, in a few brief remarks, the importance of success in this contest. It is not merely for the day, but for all time to come, that we should perpetuate for our children's children that great and free government which we have enjoyed all our lives. I beg you to remember this, not merely for my sake, but for yours. I happen, temporarily, to occupy this big White House. I am a living witness that any one of your children may look to come here as my father's child has. It is in order that each one of you may have, through this free government which we have enjoyed, an open field, and a fair chance for your industry, enterprise, and intelligence; that you may all have equal privileges in the race of life with all its desirable human aspirations—it is for this that the struggle should be maintained, that we may not lose our birthrights—not only for one, but for two or three years, if necessary. The nation is worth fighting for, to secure such an inestimable jewel.
I always feel the need, when I talk to soldiers, to emphasize, in a few short words, how important it is to succeed in this fight. It’s not just about today, but for the future, so we can pass on the great and free government we've enjoyed all our lives to our children's children. Please remember this, not just for my sake, but for yours. Right now, I happen to occupy this big White House. I’m a living example that any of your children can aspire to be here just like my father's child has. It's so that each of you can have, through this free government we've enjoyed, an equal opportunity and a fair chance for your hard work, initiative, and intelligence; so you can all have equal rights in the race of life with all its worthy human dreams—that's why we must keep fighting, to protect our birthrights—not just for one or two years, if it comes to that. The nation is worth fighting for, to secure such a priceless treasure.
MEMORANDUM.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, August 23, 1864.
This morning, as for some days past, it seems exceedingly probable that this administration will not be re-elected. Then it will be my duty to so co-operate with the President-elect as to save the Union between the election and the inauguration; as he will have secured his election on such ground that he cannot possibly save it afterward.
This morning, like for the past few days, it seems very likely that this administration won't be re-elected. If that's the case, it’ll be my responsibility to work with the President-elect to keep the Union intact between the election and the inauguration, since he will have won on a platform that makes it impossible for him to save it afterward.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR JOHNSON. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, August 26,
1864.
1864.
GOVERNOR JOHNSON, Nashville, Tenn.:
GOVERNOR JOHNSON, Nashville, TN:
Thanks to General Gillam for making the news and also to you for sending it. Does Joe Heiskell's "walking to meet us" mean any more than that "Joe" was scared and wanted to save his skin?
Thanks to General Gillam for sharing the news and also to you for sending it. Does Joe Heiskell's "walking to meet us" mean anything more than that "Joe" was scared and wanted to save himself?
TELEGRAM TO B. H. BREWSTER. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., August
30,1864.
30,1864.
HON. B. H. BREWSTER, Astor House, New York:
HON. B. H. BREWSTER, Astor House, New York:
Your letter of yesterday received. Thank you for it. Please have no fears.
I received your letter from yesterday. Thank you for it. Please don’t worry.
ORDER CONCERNING COTTON.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, August 31, 1864.
Any person or persons engaged in bringing out cotton, in strict conformity with authority given by W. P. Fessenden, Secretary of the United States Treasury, must not be hindered by the War, Navy, or any other Department of the Government, or any person engaged under any of said Departments.
Any individual or group involved in producing cotton, following the authority granted by W. P. Fessenden, Secretary of the United States Treasury, must not be obstructed by the War, Navy, or any other Department of the Government, or by anyone working for those Departments.
TO COLONEL HUIDEKOPER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, SEPTEMBER 1, 1864
COLONEL H. C. HUIDEKOPER, Meadville, Penn.
COLONEL H. C. HUIDEKOPER, Meadville, PA.
SIR: It is represented to me that there are at Rock Island, Illinois, as rebel prisoners of war, many persons of Northern and foreign birth who are unwilling to be exchanged and sent South, but who wish to take the oath of allegiance and enter the military service of the Union. Colonel Huidekoper, on behalf of the people of some parts of Pennsylvania, wishes to pay the bounties the Government would have to pay to proper persons of this class, have them enter the service of the United States, and be credited to the localities furnishing the bounty money. He will therefore proceed to Rock Island, ascertain the names of such persons (not including any who have attractions Southward), and telegraph them to the Provost-Marshal-General here, whereupon direction will be given to discharge the persons named upon their taking the oath of allegiance; and then upon the official evidence being furnished that they shall have been duly received and mustered into the service of the United States, their number will be credited as may be directed by Colonel Huidekoper.
SIR: I've been informed that at Rock Island, Illinois, there are many rebel prisoners of war, some from the North and others from abroad, who don't want to be exchanged and sent South. Instead, they wish to take an oath of allegiance and join the Union's military service. Colonel Huidekoper, representing parts of Pennsylvania, wants to pay the bounties that the Government would have to provide to eligible individuals from this group, have them enlist in the U.S. military, and ensure they are credited to the localities providing the bounty funds. He will go to Rock Island, identify the names of such individuals (excluding anyone who has ties South), and send their names to the Provost-Marshal-General here via telegraph. Once that’s done, instructions will be given to release the named individuals upon their taking the oath of allegiance. After they provide official evidence of being properly received and mustered into the service of the United States, their numbers will be credited as directed by Colonel Huidekoper.
PROCLAMATION OF THANKSGIVING,
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON CITY, September 3, 1864.
The signal success that Divine Providence has recently vouchsafed to the operations of the United States fleet and army in the harbor of Mobile, and the reduction of Fort Powell, Fort Gaines, and Fort Morgan, and the glorious achievements of the army under Major-General Sherman, in the State of Georgia, resulting in the capture of the city of Atlanta, call for devout acknowledgment to the Supreme Being in whose hands are the destinies of nations. It is therefore requested that on next Sunday, in all places of worship in the United States, thanksgivings be offered to Him for His mercy in preserve our national existence against the insurgent rebels who have been waging a cruel war against the Government of the United States for its overthrow, and also that prayer be made for Divine protection to our brave soldiers and their leaders in the field who have so often and so gallantly periled their lives in battling with the enemy, and for blessings and comfort from the Father of mercies to the sick, wounded, and prisoners, and to the orphans and widows of those who have fallen in the service of their country, and that He will continue to uphold the Government of the United States against all the efforts of public enemies and secret foes.
The recent successes granted by Divine Providence to the operations of the United States fleet and army in Mobile Harbor, along with the capture of Fort Powell, Fort Gaines, and Fort Morgan, and the impressive achievements of Major-General Sherman's army in Georgia, culminating in the capture of Atlanta, call for grateful recognition of the Supreme Being who holds the fate of nations in His hands. Therefore, it is requested that on the upcoming Sunday, in all places of worship across the United States, thanks be given to Him for His mercy in preserving our national existence against the insurgent rebels who have been waging a brutal war against the U.S. Government to topple it, and also that prayers be made for divine protection for our brave soldiers and their leaders in the field who have so often risked their lives fighting the enemy, as well as for blessings and comfort from the Father of Mercies for the sick, wounded, and prisoners, and for the orphans and widows of those who have died in service to their country, asking that He continues to uphold the Government of the United States against all efforts of public enemies and hidden foes.
ORDERS OF GRATITUDE AND REJOICING.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, September 3, 1864.
The national thanks are tendered by the President to Admiral Farragut and Major-General Canby, for the skill and harmony with which the recent operations in Mobile Harbor and against Fort Powell, Fort Gaines, and Fort Morgan were planned and carried into execution. Also to Admiral Farragut and Major-General Granger, under whose immediate command they were conducted, and to the gallant commanders on sea and land, and to the sailors and soldiers engaged in the operations, for their energy and courage, which, under the blessing of Providence, have been crowned with brilliant success, and have won for them the applause and thanks of the nation.
The nation expresses its gratitude to Admiral Farragut and Major-General Canby for the skill and teamwork with which the recent operations in Mobile Harbor and against Fort Powell, Fort Gaines, and Fort Morgan were planned and executed. Thanks also go to Admiral Farragut and Major-General Granger, under whose direct command they were conducted, along with the brave commanders at sea and on land, and the sailors and soldiers involved in the operations, for their energy and courage, which, with the blessing of Providence, have led to remarkable success and have earned them the applause and appreciation of the nation.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, September 3, 1864.
The national thanks are tendered by the President to Major-General William T. Sherman and the gallant officers and soldiers of his command before Atlanta, for the distinguished ability, courage, and perseverance displayed in the campaign in Georgia, which under Divine power resulted in the capture of the city of Atlanta. The marches, battles, sieges, and other military operations that have signalized this campaign must render it famous in the annals of war, and have entitled those who have participated therein to the applause and thanks of the nation.
The nation expresses its gratitude through the President to Major-General William T. Sherman and the brave officers and soldiers under his command before Atlanta, for their remarkable skill, bravery, and determination shown during the campaign in Georgia, which, with Divine assistance, led to the capture of Atlanta. The marches, battles, sieges, and other military actions that marked this campaign will make it well-known in the history of war, and those who took part deserve the nation's praise and thanks.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, September 3, 1864.
Ordered: First, That on Monday, the fifth day of September, commencing at the hour of twelve o'clock noon, there shall be given a salute of one hundred guns at the arsenal and navy-yard, at Washington, and on Tuesday, the 6th of September, or on the day after the receipt of this order, at each arsenal and navy-yard in the United States, for the recent brilliant achievements of the fleet and land forces of the United States in the harbor of Mobile, and in the reduction of Fort Powell, Fort Gaines, and Fort Morgan. The Secretary of War and the Secretary of the Navy will issue the necessary directions in their respective departments for the execution of this order.
Ordered: First, that on Monday, September 5th, starting at 12:00 PM, there will be a salute of one hundred guns at the arsenal and navy yard in Washington. On Tuesday, September 6th, or the day after this order is received, there will also be a salute at each arsenal and navy yard across the United States, to honor the recent outstanding achievements of the fleet and land forces in the harbor of Mobile, and in the capture of Fort Powell, Fort Gaines, and Fort Morgan. The Secretary of War and the Secretary of the Navy will provide the necessary instructions in their departments to carry out this order.
Second, That on Wednesday, the 7th of September, commencing at the hour of twelve o'clock noon, there shall be fired a salute of one hundred guns at the arsenal at Washington, and at New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Pittsburg, Newport (Ky.), and St. Louis, and New Orleans, Mobile, and Pensacola, Hilton Head, and Newbern, the day after the receipt of this order, for the brilliant achievements of the army under command of Major-General Sherman, in the State of Georgia, and for the capture of Atlanta. The Secretary of War will issue directions for the execution of this order.
Second, on Wednesday, September 7th, starting at noon, there will be a salute of one hundred guns fired at the arsenal in Washington, as well as in New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Newport (Ky.), St. Louis, New Orleans, Mobile, Pensacola, Hilton Head, and New Bern, the day after this order is received, to celebrate the outstanding achievements of the army led by Major-General Sherman in Georgia, including the capture of Atlanta. The Secretary of War will provide instructions for carrying out this order.
A. LINCOLN, President Of the United States.
A. LINCOLN, President of the United States.
TO MRS. GURNEY.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, SEPTEMBER 4, 1864.
ELIZA P. GURNEY.
ELIZA P. GURNEY.
MY ESTEEMED FRIEND:—I have not forgotten probably never shall forget the very impressive occasion when yourself and friends visited me on a Sabbath forenoon two years ago—nor has your kind letter, written nearly a year later, even been for gotten. In all, it has been your purpose to strengthen my reliance on God. I am much indebted to the good Christian people of the country for their constant prayer and consolations; and to no one of them, more than to yourself. The purposes of the Almighty are perfect, and must prevail, though we erring mortals may fail to accurately perceive them in advance. We hoped for a happy termination of this terrible war long before this; but God knows best, and has ruled otherwise. We shall yet acknowledge His wisdom, and our own error therein. Mean while we must work earnestly in the best light He gives us, trusting that so working still conduces to the great ends He ordains. Surely He intends some great good to follow this mighty convulsion, which no mortal could make, and no mortal could stay.
MY DEAR FRIEND:—I have not forgotten, and probably never will forget, the very memorable occasion when you and your friends visited me on a Sunday morning two years ago. Your thoughtful letter, written nearly a year later, has also stayed with me. Throughout this time, your goal has been to strengthen my faith in God. I am deeply grateful to the good Christian people in the community for their constant prayers and support, and to no one more than you. The plans of the Almighty are perfect and will prevail, even though we fallible humans may not always see them clearly in advance. We hoped for a happy ending to this terrible war long before now, but God knows best and has decided otherwise. We shall eventually recognize His wisdom and our own mistakes in this matter. In the meantime, we must work diligently with the best understanding He gives us, trusting that our efforts will contribute to the great purposes He has in mind. Surely He means for some great good to arise from this massive upheaval, which no human could create or prevent.
Your people—the Friends—have had, and are having, a very great trial. On principle, and faith, opposed to both war and oppression, they can only practically oppose oppression by war. For those appealing to me on conscientious grounds, I have done, and shall do, the best I could and can, in my own conscience, under my oath to the law. That you believe this I doubt not, and believing it, I shall still receive, for our country and myself your earnest prayers to our Father in Heaven.
Your community—the Friends—have faced and are currently facing a significant challenge. On principle and belief, against both war and oppression, they can only effectively fight against oppression through war. For those who reach out to me on moral grounds, I have done and will continue to do my best, in my own conscience, under my oath to the law. I have no doubt that you believe this, and with that belief, I will still welcome your heartfelt prayers for our country and for myself to our Father in Heaven.
Your sincere friend,
Your genuine friend,
REPLY TO A COMMITTEE OF COLORED PEOPLE FROM BALTIMORE
WHO PRESENTED HIM WITH A BIBLE,
SEPTEMBER 7, 1864.
SEPTEMBER 7, 1864.
I can only say now, as I have often said before, it has always been a sentiment with me, that all mankind should be free. So far as I have been able, so far as came within my sphere, I have always acted as I believed was just and right, and done all I could for the good of mankind. I have, in letters sent forth from this office, expressed myself better than I can now.
I can only say now, as I’ve often said before, that I’ve always believed everyone should be free. As much as I could within my reach, I’ve always acted according to what I thought was fair and right, and I’ve done everything I could for the benefit of humanity. In the letters I've sent out from this office, I've expressed myself better than I can right now.
In regard to the great Book, I have only to say it is the best gift which God has ever given to man. All the good from the Saviour of the world is communicated to us through this book. But for that Book, we could not know right from wrong. All those things desirable to man are contained in it. I return you sincere thanks for this very elegant copy of this great Book of God which you present.
Concerning the great Book, I can only say it’s the best gift God has ever given to humanity. All the good from the Savior of the world comes to us through this book. Without it, we wouldn't know right from wrong. Everything desirable to humans is in it. I sincerely thank you for this beautiful copy of this great Book of God that you’ve given me.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR PICKERING.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., September 8, 1864:
GOVERNOR PICKERING, Olympia, W. T.:
GOVERNOR PICKERING, Olympia, WA:
Your patriotic despatch of yesterday received and will be published.
Your patriotic message from yesterday has been received and will be published.
ORDER OF THANKS TO HUNDRED-DAY TROOPS FROM OHIO.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON CITY, September 10, 1864.
The term of one hundred days for which the National Guard of Ohio volunteered having expired, the President directs an official acknowledgment to be made of their patriotic and valuable services during the recent campaigns. The term of service of their enlistment was short, but distinguished by memorable events. In the Valley of the Shenandoah, on the Peninsula, in the operations on the James River, around Petersburg and Richmond, in the battle of Monocacy, and in the intrenchments of Washington, and in other important service, the National Guard of Ohio performed with alacrity the duty of patriotic volunteers, for which they are entitled to and are hereby tendered, through the Governor of their State, the national thanks.
The one hundred days that the National Guard of Ohio volunteered for is up, and the President has directed an official acknowledgment of their patriotic and valuable services during the recent campaigns. Their enlistment term was short, but it was marked by significant events. In the Valley of the Shenandoah, on the Peninsula, during the operations on the James River, around Petersburg and Richmond, in the battle of Monocacy, in the fortifications of Washington, and in other important missions, the National Guard of Ohio carried out their duties with enthusiasm as patriotic volunteers. For this, they are deserving of and are hereby extended, through the Governor of their State, the nation's gratitude.
TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, September 12, 1864.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT:
LT. GEN. GRANT:
Sheridan and Early are facing each other at a dead-lock. Could we not pick up a regiment here and there, to the number of say ten thousand men, and quietly but suddenly concentrate them at Sheridan's camp and enable him to make a strike?
Sheridan and Early are at a standstill, facing each other. Can't we gather a regiment or two, maybe around ten thousand men, and suddenly but quietly bring them to Sheridan's camp to help him make a move?
This is but a suggestion.
This is just a suggestion.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO JAMES G. BLAINE. WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., September
13, 1864.
13, 1864.
HON. J. G. BLAINE, Augusta, Me.: On behalf of the Union, thanks to Maine. Thanks to you personally for sending the news.
HON. J. G. BLAINE, Augusta, Me.: On behalf of the Union, thank you, Maine. Thank you personally for sending the news.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
P. S.—Send same to L. B. Smith and M. A. Blanchard, Portland, Me. A. L.
P. S.—Send the same to L. B. Smith and M. A. Blanchard, Portland, Me. A. L.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL ROSECRANS. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, September 13, 1864
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL ROSECRANS. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, September 13, 1864
MAJOR-GENERAL ROSECRANS, Saint Louis:
Major General Rosecrans, St. Louis:
Postpone the execution of S. H. Anderson for two weeks. Hear what his friends can say in mitigation and report to me.
Postpone S. H. Anderson's execution for two weeks. Listen to what his friends have to say in support and let me know.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
MAJOR ECKERT: Please send the above telegram.
MAJOR ECKERT: Please send the telegram above.
JNO. G. NICOLAY, Private Secretary.
JNO. G. NICOLAY, Personal Assistant.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL SLOUGH.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., September 16, 1864.
GENERAL SLOUGH, Alexandria, Va.:
GENERAL SLOUGH, Alexandria, VA:
On the 14th I commuted the sentence of Conley, but fearing you may not have received notice I send this. Do not execute him.
On the 14th, I changed Conley's sentence, but I'm worried you might not have gotten the notice, so I'm sending this. Do not execute him.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN. WASHINGTON, D. C., September 17,1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERMAN, Atlanta, Georgia:
I feel great interest in the subjects of your despatch mentioning corn and sorghum, and the contemplated visit to you.
I’m really interested in the topics in your message about corn and sorghum, as well as the planned visit to you.
A. LINCOLN, President of the United States.
A. LINCOLN, President of the United States.
TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, September 19, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERMAN:
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERMAN:
The State election of Indiana occurs on the 11th of October, and the loss of it to the friends of the Government would go far towards losing the whole Union cause. The bad effect upon the November election, and especially the giving the State government to those who will oppose the war in every possible way, are too much to risk if it can be avoided. The draft proceeds, notwithstanding its strong tendency to lose us the State. Indiana is the only important State voting in October whose soldiers cannot vote in the field. Anything you can safely do to let her soldiers or any part of them go home and vote at the State election will be greatly in point. They need not remain for the Presidential election, but may return to you at once. This is in no sense an order, but is merely intended to impress you with the importance to the Army itself of your doing all you safely can, yourself being the judge of what you can safely do.
The Indiana state election takes place on October 11th, and if the Government's supporters lose, it could significantly hurt the entire Union cause. The negative impact on the November election, especially if the State government goes to those who will resist the war in every way possible, is too risky to ignore if it can be avoided. The draft is still happening, even though it could cost us the State. Indiana is the only key state voting in October where soldiers can't vote while in the field. Anything you can do to safely allow some of these soldiers to go home and vote in the state election would be very important. They don't need to stay for the Presidential election and can return to you right away. This isn't an order, but I want to highlight how crucial it is for the Army that you do everything you can safely manage, with you being the best judge of what that is.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
INDORSEMENT CONCERNING AN EXCHANGE OF PRISONERS, SEPTEMBER 1864.
The writer of this, who appeals for his brother, is our minister to Ecuador, and whom, if at all compatible, I would like to have obliged by a special exchange of his brother.
The writer of this, who is asking for his brother, is our minister to Ecuador, and if possible, I would like to arrange a special exchange for his brother.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL P. SHERIDAN. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, September
20, 1864
20, 1864
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERIDAN, Winchester, Va.:
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERIDAN, Winchester, VA:
Have just heard of your great victory. God bless you all, officers and men. Strongly inclined to come up and See you.
I've just heard about your amazing victory. God bless you all, officers and men. I'm really thinking about coming up to see you.
TO GENERAL HITCHCOCK,
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, September 21, 1864.
GENERAL HITCHCOCK:
GENERAL HITCHCOCK:
Please see the bearer, Mr. Broadwell, on a question about a mutual supplying of clothes to prisoners.
Please see Mr. Broadwell, the person carrying this message, about a question regarding providing clothes for prisoners.
Yours truly,
Best regards,
TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, September 22, 1864.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT:
LT. GEN. GRANT:
I send this as an explanation to you, and to do justice to the Secretary of War. I was induced, upon pressing application, to authorize the agents of one of the districts of Pennsylvania to recruit in one of the prison depots in Illinois; and the thing went so far before it came to the knowledge of the Secretary that, in my judgment, it could not be abandoned without greater evil than would follow its going through. I did not know at the time that you had protested against that class of thing being done; and I now say that while this particular job must be completed, no other of the sort will be authorized, without an understanding with you, if at all. The Secretary of War is wholly free of any part in this blunder.
I'm sending this to explain my actions and to give credit to the Secretary of War. I was persuaded, after a strong request, to let the agents from one of the districts in Pennsylvania recruit at a prison depot in Illinois; and it progressed so far before the Secretary found out that I believed it couldn't be stopped without causing more harm than allowing it to continue. At that time, I didn't know you had objected to such actions being taken; and I want to clarify that while this particular task must be finished, I won’t authorize any similar actions without discussing it with you first, if at all. The Secretary of War is completely free of any responsibility for this mistake.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TO POSTMASTER-GENERAL BLAIR.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, September 23, 1864.
HON. MONTGOMERY BLAIR.
Hon. Montgomery Blair.
MY DEAR SIR:—You have generously said to me, more than once, that whenever your resignation could be a relief to me, it was at my disposal. The time has come. You very well know that this proceeds from no dissatisfaction of mine with you personally or officially. Your uniform kindness has been unsurpassed by that of any other friend, and while it is true that the war does not so greatly add to the difficulties of your department as to those of some others, it is yet much to say, as I most truly can, that in the three years and a half during which you have administered the General Post-Office, I remember no single complaint against you in connection therewith.
MY DEAR SIR:—You have kindly told me more than once that whenever your resignation could ease my situation, it was yours to give. That time has arrived. You know well that this decision comes from no dissatisfaction with you personally or in your role. Your consistent kindness has been unmatched by any other friend, and while it's true that the war doesn't add as many challenges to your department as it does to some others, I can genuinely say that in the three and a half years you have managed the General Post-Office, I have not heard a single complaint against you in relation to it.
Yours, as ever,
Yours always,
ORDER CONCERNING THE PURCHASE OF PRODUCTS IN INSURRECTIONARY STATES.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, September 24, 1864.
I. Congress having authorized the purchase for the United States of the products of States declared in insurrection, and the Secretary of the Treasury having designated New Orleans, Memphis, Nashville, Pensacola, Port Royal, Beaufort (North Carolina), and Norfolk, as places of purchase, and, with my approval, appointed agents and made regulations under which said products may be purchased, therefore:
I. Congress has given the go-ahead for the United States to buy products from states that are in rebellion, and the Secretary of the Treasury has chosen New Orleans, Memphis, Nashville, Pensacola, Port Royal, Beaufort (North Carolina), and Norfolk as the places for these purchases. With my approval, agents have been appointed and regulations have been established for how these products can be purchased, therefore:
II. All persons except such as may be in the civil, military, or naval service of the government, having in their possession any products of States or parts of States declared in insurrection, which said agents are authorized to purchase; and all persons owning or controlling such products therein are authorized to convey such products to either of the places which have been hereby or may hereafter be designated as places of purchase, and such products so destined shall not be liable to detention, seizure, or forfeiture while in transitu, or in store waiting transportation.
II. All individuals, except those who are in civil, military, or naval service of the government, who have any products from states or regions declared in insurrection, which these agents are allowed to purchase; and all individuals owning or controlling such products are allowed to transport those products to any locations that are designated now or in the future as places of purchase. These products in transit won’t be subject to detention, seizure, or forfeiture while they are being transported or stored awaiting transportation.
III. Any person having the certificate of a purchasing agent, as prescribed by Treasury Regulation VIII, is authorized to pass with the necessary means of transportation to the points named in said certificate, and to return therefrom with the products required for the fulfilment of the stipulations set forth in said certificate.
III. Anyone with a purchasing agent certificate, as outlined by Treasury Regulation VIII, is allowed to travel with the required means of transportation to the locations mentioned in that certificate and to return with the products needed to fulfill the terms stated in that certificate.
IV. Any person having sold and delivered to a purchasing agent any products of an insurrectionary State in accordance with the regulations in relation thereto, and having in his possession a certificate setting forth the fact of such purchase and sale; the character and quantity of products, and the aggregate amount paid therefor, as prescribed by Regulation I, shall be permitted by the military authority commanding at the place of sale to purchase from any authorized dealer at such place merchandise and other articles not contraband of war nor prohibited by order of the War Department, nor coin, bullion, or foreign exchange, to an amount not exceeding in value one-third of the aggregate value of the products sold by him as certified by the agents purchasing, and the merchandise and other articles so purchased may be transported by the same route, and to the same place, from and by which the products sold and delivered reached the purchasing agent, as set forth in the certificate, and such merchandise and other articles shall have safe conduct, and shall not be subject to detention, seizure, or forfeiture while being transported to the places and by the routes set forth in the said certificate.
IV. Anyone who has sold and delivered products from a state involved in an insurrection to a purchasing agent, following the related regulations, and holds a certificate confirming that sale, including details about the type and amount of products and the total payment made, as required by Regulation I, will be allowed by the military authority in charge at the sale location to buy merchandise and other items that aren't considered contraband or prohibited by the War Department. This can include items up to a value of one-third of the total value of the products sold, as certified by the purchasing agents. The merchandise and items purchased may be transported via the same route and to the same location from which the products were delivered to the purchasing agent, as stated in the certificate. These items will have safe passage and cannot be detained, seized, or forfeited while being transported to the designated locations and via the routes mentioned in the certificate.
V. Generals commanding military districts, and commandants of military posts and detachments, and officers commanding fleets, flotillas, and gunboats, will give safe conduct to persons and products, merchandise, and other articles duly authorized as aforesaid, and not contraband of war, or prohibited by order of the War Department, or of the order of such generals commanding, or other duly authorized military or naval officer, made in pursuance hereof, and all persons hindering or preventing such safe conduct of persons or property will, be deemed guilty of a military offense and punished accordingly.
V. Generals in charge of military districts, as well as commandants of military posts and detachments, and officers in command of fleets, flotillas, and gunboats, will ensure safe passage for individuals and goods, products, merchandise, and other items that have been properly authorized as mentioned above, and are not classified as contraband or restricted by orders from the War Department, or by commands issued from such generals, or any other duly authorized military or naval officer acting in accordance with this directive. Anyone obstructing or preventing the safe passage of people or property will be considered guilty of a military offense and will face appropriate punishment.
VI. Any person transporting or attempting to transport any merchandise or other articles except in pursuance of regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury, dated July 29, 1864, or in pursuance of this order, or transporting or attempting to transport any merchandise or other articles contraband of war or forbidden by any order of the War Department, will be deemed guilty of a military offense and punished accordingly; and all products of insurrectionary States found in transitu to any other person or than a purchasing agent and a designated of purchase shall be seized and forfeited to the States, except such as may be moving to a loyal state under duly authorized permits of a proper officer of the Treasury Department, as prescribed by Regulation XXXVIII, concerning commercial intercourse, dated July 29, 1864, or such as may have been found abandoned, or have been captured and are moving in pursuance of the act of March 12, 1864.
VI. Anyone transporting or trying to transport any goods or other items not following the regulations set by the Secretary of the Treasury on July 29, 1864, or this order, or transporting or trying to transport any goods or other items that are contraband of war or prohibited by any order from the War Department will be considered guilty of a military offense and will be punished accordingly. Additionally, all products from rebellious States found in transit to anyone other than a purchasing agent or designated buyer will be seized and forfeited to the States, except for those going to a loyal state with properly authorized permits from the appropriate officer of the Treasury Department, as stated in Regulation XXXVIII about commercial interactions, dated July 29, 1864, or those that have been found abandoned or captured and are being transported under the act of March 12, 1864.
VII. No military or naval officer of the United States, or person in the military or naval service, nor any civil officer, except such as are appointed for that purpose, shall engage in trade or traffic in the products of the insurrectionary States, or furnish transportation therefor under pain of being deemed guilty of unlawful trading with the enemy and punished accordingly.
VII. No military or naval officer of the United States, or anyone in the military or naval service, nor any civil officer, except those appointed for that purpose, shall engage in trade or commerce with the products of the rebellious States, or provide transportation for them, under the risk of being considered guilty of illegal trading with the enemy and facing appropriate penalties.
VIII. The Secretary of War will make such general orders or regulations as will insure the proper observance and execution of,, this order, and the Secretary of the Navy will give instructions to officers commanding fleets, flotillas, and gunboats in conformity therewith.
VIII. The Secretary of War will issue general orders or regulations to ensure the proper observance and execution of this order, and the Secretary of the Navy will instruct the officers in charge of fleets, flotillas, and gunboats to comply with it.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN. WASHINGTON, D. C., September 27, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERMAN, Atlanta, Georgia:
You say Jefferson Davis is on a visit to Hood. I judge that Brown and Stephens are the objects of his visit.
You say Jefferson Davis is visiting Hood. I think that Brown and Stephens are the reasons for his visit.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D.C., September 29,1864.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
I hope it will have no constraint on you, nor do harm any way, for me to say I am a little afraid lest Lee sends reinforcements to Early, and thus enables him to turn upon Sheridan.
I hope this won’t restrict you or cause any harm, but I just wanted to express that I’m a little worried that Lee might send reinforcements to Early, which would allow him to attack Sheridan.
INDORSEMENT.
September 29, 1864.
I think the bearer of this, Second Lieutenant Albee, deserves a hearing. Will the Secretary of War please accord it to him?
I believe the person delivering this, Second Lieutenant Albee, deserves a chance to speak. Will the Secretary of War please grant him that opportunity?
ORDER RETURNING THANKS TO THE VOLUNTEERS FOR ONE HUNDRED DAYS
FROM THE STATES OF INDIANA, ILLINOIS, IOWA, AND WISCONSIN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION,
White House,
WASHINGTON, October 1, 1864.
WASHINGTON, October 1, 1864.
The term of one hundred days for which volunteers from the States of Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, and Wisconsin volunteered, under the call of their respective governors, in the months of May and June, to aid in the campaign of General Sherman, having expired; the President directs an official acknowledgment to be made of their patriotic service. It was their good fortune to render efficient service in the brilliant operations in the Southwest and to contribute to the victories of the national arms over the rebel forces in Georgia under command of Johnston and Hood. On all occasions and in every service to which they were assigned their duty as patriotic volunteers was performed with alacrity and courage, for which they are entitled to and are hereby tendered the national thanks through the governors of their respective States.
The one hundred-day term that volunteers from Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, and Wisconsin signed up for, following the call of their governors in May and June, to support General Sherman's campaign, has come to an end. The President has ordered an official recognition of their patriotic service. They were fortunate to provide valuable support during the successful operations in the Southwest and to help secure victories for the nation against rebel forces in Georgia led by Johnston and Hood. At all times and in every task they were assigned, these patriotic volunteers carried out their duties with eagerness and bravery, for which they are deserving of, and are hereby granted, national thanks through the governors of their respective States.
The Secretary of War is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the governors of Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, and Wisconsin and to cause a certificate of their honorable service to be delivered to the officers and soldiers of the States above named who recently served in the military force of the United States as volunteers for one hundred days.
The Secretary of War is instructed to send a copy of this order to the governors of Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, and Wisconsin and to ensure that a certificate of their honorable service is given to the officers and soldiers from the states mentioned above who recently served as volunteers in the U.S. military for one hundred days.
TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, October 5, 1864
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT:
LT. GEN. GRANT:
I inclose you a copy of a correspondence in regard to a contemplated exchange of naval prisoners through your lines, and not very distant from your headquarters. It only came to the knowledge of the War Department and of myself yesterday, and it gives us some uneasiness. I therefore send it to you with the statement that, as the numbers to be exchanged under it are small, and so much has already been done to effect the exchange, I hope you may find it consistent to let it go forward under the general supervision of General Butler, and particularly in reference to the points he holds vital in exchanges. Still, you are at liberty to arrest the whole operation if in your judgment the public good requires it.
I’m enclosing a copy of a correspondence regarding a planned exchange of naval prisoners through your lines, not far from your headquarters. It only came to the attention of the War Department and me yesterday, and it's causing us some concern. I’m sending it to you with the understanding that, since the number of prisoners to be exchanged is small and a lot has already been done to make the exchange happen, I hope you can allow it to proceed under the general supervision of General Butler, particularly regarding the aspects he considers crucial in exchanges. However, you still have the authority to halt the entire operation if you believe it’s in the public's best interest.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
INDORSEMENT ON A MEMORANDUM BY GENERAL McDOWELL, OCTOBER 7, 1864
I well remember the meetings herein narrated. See nothing for me to object to in the narrative as being made by General McDowell, except the phrase attributed to me "of the Jacobinism of Congress",
I clearly remember the meetings described here. I have no objections to the account given by General McDowell, except for the phrase attributed to me about "the Jacobinism of Congress."
[This memorandum describes the private discussions that preceded the transfer of McClellan's army from the Potomac, where it had confronted the Confederates at Manassas. See H. J. Raymond: Life of Lincoln, p. 772]
[This memo outlines the private talks that took place before McClellan's army was moved from the Potomac, where it had faced the Confederates at Manassas. See H. J. Raymond: Life of Lincoln, p. 772]
which phrase I do not remember using literally or in substance, and which I wish not to be published in any event.
which phrase I don’t remember using literally or in substance, and which I don’t want to be published under any circumstances.
TO H. W. HOFFMAN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION WASHINGTON, October 10, 1864.
HON. HENRY W. HOFFMAN.
Hon. Henry W. Hoffman.
MY DEAR SIR:—A convention of Maryland has framed a new constitution for the State; a public meeting is called for this evening at Baltimore to aid in securing its ratification by the people, and you ask a word from me for the occasion. I presume the only feature of the instrument about which there is serious controversy is that which provides for the extinction of slavery. It needs not to be a secret and I presume it is no secret, that I wish success to this provision. I desire it on every consideration. I wish all men to be free. I wish the material prosperity of the already free, which I feel sure the extinction of slavery would bring. I wish to see in process of disappearing that only thing which ever could bring this nation to civil war. I attempt no argument. Argument upon the question is already exhausted by the abler, better informed, and more immediately interested sons of Maryland herself. I only add that I shall be gratified exceedingly if the good people of the State shall, by their votes, ratify the new constitution.
MY DEAR SIR:—A convention in Maryland has created a new constitution for the state; a public meeting is scheduled for this evening in Baltimore to help ensure its approval by the people, and you’ve asked me for a few words for the occasion. I suppose the main issue that’s causing serious debate is the part that calls for the abolition of slavery. It doesn’t need to be a secret, and I suppose it isn’t, that I support this provision wholeheartedly. I want it for every reason imaginable. I want all people to be free. I want the economic growth for those who are already free, which I’m sure the end of slavery would bring. I want to see that one thing, which has the potential to tear this nation apart in civil war, disappear. I won’t try to argue the point. The debate on this issue has already been thoroughly covered by the more knowledgeable, better-informed, and more directly affected citizens of Maryland. I will only add that I would be extremely pleased if the good people of the state choose to ratify the new constitution with their votes.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR CURTIN.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., October 10, 1864, 5 P.M.
GOVERNOR CURTIN, Harrisburg, Pa.:
GOVERNOR CURTIN, Harrisburg, PA:
Yours of to-day just this moment received, and the Secretary having left it is impossible for me to answer to-day. I have not received your letter from Erie.
I just received your letter today, and since the Secretary has left, I can’t respond today. I haven’t received your letter from Erie.
TELEGRAM TO ROBERT T. LINCOLN, Cambridge, Mass.:
Your letter makes us a little uneasy about your health. Telegraph us how you are. If you think it would help you, make us a visit.
Your letter makes us a bit worried about your health. Please send us a message about how you're doing. If you think it would do you good, come to visit us.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., October 12, 1864.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
Secretary of War not being in, I answer yours about election. Pennsylvania very close, and still in doubt on home vote. Ohio largely for us, with all the members of Congress but two or three. Indiana largely for us,—Governor, it is said, by fifteen thousand, and eight of the eleven members of Congress. Send us what you may know of your army vote.
The Secretary of War isn’t here, so I’m replying to your message about the election. The situation in Pennsylvania is very close and still uncertain regarding the local vote. Ohio is mostly in our favor, with almost all members of Congress on our side except for two or three. Indiana is also largely supporting us—it's said the Governor will win by fifteen thousand votes, and eight out of the eleven members of Congress will be ours. Please send us any information you might have about your army vote.
RESPONSE TO A SERENADE,
OCTOBER 19, 1864.
FRIENDS AND FELLOW-CITIZENS:—I am notified that this is a compliment paid me by the loyal Marylanders resident in this District. I infer that the adoption of the new constitution for the State furnishes the occasion, and that in your view the extirpation of slavery constitutes the chief merit of the new constitution. Most heartily do I congratulate you, and Maryland, and the nation, and the world, upon this event. I regret that it did not occur two years sooner, which, I am sure, would have saved the nation more money than would have met all the private loss incident to the measure; but it has come at last, and I sincerely hope its friends may fully realize all their anticipations of good from it, and that its opponents may by its effects be agreeably and profitably disappointed.
FRIENDS AND FELLOW-CITIZENS:—I’ve been informed that this is a compliment from the loyal Marylanders living in this District. I gather that the new state constitution is the reason for this occasion, and that you believe the abolition of slavery is its greatest achievement. I wholeheartedly congratulate you, Maryland, the nation, and the world on this milestone. I do wish it had happened two years earlier, as I’m certain it would have saved the nation more money than the total private losses connected to this change; but it has finally arrived, and I sincerely hope its supporters enjoy all the benefits they anticipated, and that its opponents are pleasantly and profitably surprised by its impact.
A word upon another subject. Something said by the Secretary of State in his recent speech at Auburn, has been construed by some into a threat, that if I shall be beaten at the election, I will, between then and the end of my constitutional term, do what I may be able to ruin the Government.
A quick word on a different topic. Something the Secretary of State mentioned in his recent speech at Auburn has been interpreted by some as a threat, suggesting that if I lose the election, I will do everything I can to undermine the Government during the time left in my constitutional term.
Others regard the fact that the Chicago Convention adjourned, not sine die, but to meet again, if called to do so by a particular individual, as the intimation of a purpose that if their nominee shall be elected he will at once seize control of the Government. I hope the good people will permit themselves to suffer no uneasiness on either point. I am struggling to maintain the Government, not to overthrow it. I am struggling especially to prevent others from overthrowing it. I therefore say, that if I live, I shall remain President until the 4th of next March, and that whoever shall be constitutionally elected, in November, shall be duly installed as President on the 4th of March, and in the interval I shall do my utmost that whoever is to hold the helm for the next voyage shall start with the best possible chance of saving the ship. This is due to the people, both on principle and under the Constitution. Their will, constitutionally expressed, is the ultimate law for all. If they should deliberately resolve to have immediate peace, even at the loss of their country and their liberties, I know not the power or the right to resist them. It is their own business, and they must do as they please with their own. I believe, however, they are still resolved to preserve their country and their liberties; and in this, in office or out of it, I am resolved to stand by them. I may add, that in this purpose to save the country and its liberties, no classes of people seem so nearly unanimous as the soldiers in the field and the sailors afloat. Do they not have the hardest of it? Who should quail while they do not? God bless the soldiers and seamen, with all their brave commanders.
Others see the fact that the Chicago Convention adjourned, not indefinitely, but to meet again if called by a specific person, as a sign that if their choice is elected, he will quickly take control of the Government. I hope good people won’t worry about either of these ideas. I’m working to support the Government, not to bring it down. I’m especially trying to prevent anyone else from toppling it. So, I want to say that if I’m alive, I’ll remain President until March 4th, and whoever is constitutionally elected in November will be properly installed as President on that date. In the meantime, I’ll do everything I can to ensure that whoever takes charge for the next term starts with the best chance of keeping the country afloat. This is what the people deserve, both as a principle and under the Constitution. Their will, expressed through the proper channels, is the final law for everyone. If they decide they want immediate peace, even at the expense of their country and their freedoms, I don’t see the power or the right to oppose them. It’s their business, and they can do what they want with their own. However, I believe they still want to protect their country and their freedoms; and in this, whether in office or not, I’m committed to standing by them. I should add that in this mission to save the country and its freedoms, no group seems to be more united than the soldiers in the field and the sailors at sea. Don’t they have the toughest time? Who should be afraid while they are not? God bless the soldiers and sailors and all their brave leaders.
PROCLAMATION OF THANKSGIVING, OCTOBER 20, 1864.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
It has pleased Almighty God to prolong our national life another year, defending us with his guardian care against unfriendly designs from abroad, and vouchsafing to us in His mercy many and signal victories over the enemy, who is of our own household. It has also pleased our Heavenly Father to favor as well our citizens in their homes as our soldiers in their camps, and our sailors on the rivers and seas, with unusual health. He has largely augmented our free population by emancipation and by immigration, while he has opened to us new: sources of wealth, and has crowned the labor of our working-men in every department of industry with abundant rewards. Moreover, he has been pleased to animate and inspire our minds and hearts with fortitude, courage, and resolution sufficient for the great trial of civil war into which we have been brought by our adherence as a nation to the cause of freedom and humanity, and to afford to us reasonable hopes of an ultimate and happy deliverance from all our dangers and afflictions.
It has pleased Almighty God to extend our national existence for another year, protecting us with His care against hostile intentions from abroad and granting us, in His mercy, numerous significant victories over the enemy within our own borders. Our Heavenly Father has also favored both our citizens at home and our soldiers in their camps, as well as our sailors on rivers and seas, with remarkable health. He has greatly increased our free population through emancipation and immigration, while providing us with new sources of wealth and rewarding the hard work of our laborers in every industry with ample benefits. Furthermore, He has inspired our minds and hearts with the courage, strength, and determination needed for the significant trial of civil war we face due to our commitment as a nation to the cause of freedom and humanity, giving us reasonable hope for a future and joyful resolution to all our dangers and struggles.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, do hereby appoint and set apart the last Thursday in November next as a day which I desire to be observed by all my fellow-citizens, wherever they may be then, as a day of thanksgiving and praise to Almighty God, the beneficent Creator and Ruler of the Universe. And I do further recommend to my fellow-citizens aforesaid, that on that occasion they do reverently humble themselves in the dust, and from thence offer up penitent and fervent prayers and supplications to the great Disposer of events for a return of the inestimable blessings of peace, union, and harmony throughout the, land which it has pleased him to assign as a dwelling-place for ourselves and for our posterity throughout all generations.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, do hereby designate the last Thursday in November of this year as a day that I want all my fellow citizens, wherever they may be, to observe as a day of thanksgiving and praise to Almighty God, the gracious Creator and Ruler of the Universe. I also encourage my fellow citizens to take that occasion to humbly reflect and offer sincere prayers and requests to the great Organizer of events for a restoration of the invaluable blessings of peace, unity, and harmony across the land that He has chosen as a home for ourselves and our future generations.
In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.
In witness whereof, I have set my hand and affixed the seal of the United States.
Done at the city of Washington, this twentieth day of October, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-four, and of the independence of the United States the eighty-ninth.
Done at the city of Washington, this 20th day of October, in the year of our Lord 1864, and of the independence of the United States the 89th.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By President WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
TELEGRAM To J. G. NICOLAY. WASHINGTON, D. C., October 21, 1864. 9.45 P.M.
J. G. NICOLAY, Saint Louis, Missouri:
While Curtis is fighting Price, have you any idea where the force under Rosecrans is, or what it is doing?
While Curtis is fighting Price, do you have any idea where Rosecrans's troops are or what they're doing?
TO WILLIAM B. CAMPBELL AND OTHERS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., October 22, 1864.
MESSRS WILLIAM B. CAMPBELL, THOMAS A. R. NELSON, JAMES T. P. CARTER, JOHN WILLIAMS, A. BLIZZARD, HENRY COOPER, BAILLIE PEYTON, JOHN LELLYET, EMERSON ETHERIDGE, and JOHN D. PERRYMAN.
MESSRS WILLIAM B. CAMPBELL, THOMAS A. R. NELSON, JAMES T. P. CARTER, JOHN WILLIAMS, A. BLIZZARD, HENRY COOPER, BAILLIE PEYTON, JOHN LELLYET, EMERSON ETHERIDGE, and JOHN D. PERRYMAN.
GENTLEMEN:—On the 15th day of this month, as I remember, a printed paper manuscript, with a few manuscript interlineations, called a protest, with your names appended thereto, and accompanied by another printed paper, purporting to be a proclamation by Andrew Johnson, Military Governor of Tennessee, and also a manuscript paper, purporting to be extracts from the Code of Tennessee, were laid before me.
GENTLEMEN:—On the 15th of this month, if I recall correctly, I received a printed manuscript titled "Protest," which had a few handwritten edits and included your names. This was accompanied by another printed document claiming to be a proclamation from Andrew Johnson, the Military Governor of Tennessee, as well as a handwritten document that seemed to be excerpts from the Tennessee Code.
The protest, proclamation, and extracts are respectively as follows:
The protest, announcement, and excerpts are as follows:
[The protest is here recited, and also the proclamation of Governor Johnson, dated September 30, to which it refers, together with a list of the counties in East, Middle, and West Tennessee; also extracts from the Code of Tennessee in relation to electors of President and Vice-President, qualifications of voters for members of the General Assembly, places of holding elections, and officers of popular elections.]
[The protest is presented here, along with Governor Johnson's proclamation from September 30, which it mentions, as well as a list of the counties in East, Middle, and West Tennessee; also included are excerpts from the Code of Tennessee regarding electors for President and Vice-President, the qualifications for voters for members of the General Assembly, locations for holding elections, and officials of popular elections.]
At the time these papers were presented, as before stated, I had never seen either of them, nor heard of the subject to which they related, except in a general way one day previously.
At the time these papers were presented, as mentioned earlier, I had never seen either of them or heard about the topic they covered, except in a general way just one day before.
Up to the present moment, nothing whatever upon the subject has passed between Governor Johnson, or any one else, connected with the proclamation, and myself.
Up to now, nothing at all about the subject has been discussed between Governor Johnson, anyone else involved with the proclamation, and me.
Since receiving the papers, as stated, I have given the subject such brief consideration as I have been able to do, in the midst of so many pressing public duties.
Since getting the papers, as mentioned, I have given the topic the limited thought I could manage, amidst so many urgent public responsibilities.
My conclusion is, that I can have nothing to do with the matter, either to sustain the plan as the convention and Governor Johnson have initiated it, or to revoke or modify it as you demand.
My conclusion is that I can't get involved in the matter, either to support the plan as the convention and Governor Johnson have set it up or to cancel or change it as you request.
By the Constitution and laws, the President is charged with no duty in the presidential election in any State, nor do I in this case perceive any military reason for his interference in the matter.
By the Constitution and laws, the President has no responsibility in the presidential election in any State, nor do I see any military reason for him to get involved in this issue.
The movement set on foot by the convention and Governor Johnson does not, as seems to be assumed by you, emanate from the National Executive.
The movement initiated by the convention and Governor Johnson does not, as you seem to assume, come from the National Executive.
In no proper sense can it be considered other than an independent movement of, at least, a portion of the loyal people of Tennessee.
In no proper sense can it be seen as anything other than an independent movement of, at least, some of the loyal people of Tennessee.
I do not perceive in the plan any menace, or violence, or coercion towards any one.
I don’t see any threat, violence, or coercion in the plan towards anyone.
Governor Johnson, like any other loyal citizen of Tennessee, has the right to favor any political plan he chooses, and, as military governor, it is his duty to keep peace among and for the loyal people of the State.
Governor Johnson, like any other loyal citizen of Tennessee, has the right to support any political plan he wants, and, as military governor, it's his responsibility to maintain peace for the loyal people of the State.
I cannot discern that by this plan he purposes any more. But you object to the plan.
I can't see that he's aiming for anything more with this plan. But you have concerns about it.
Leaving it alone will be your perfect security against it. It is not proposed to force you into it. Do as you please, on your own account, peaceably and loyally, and Governor Johnson will not molest you, but will protect you against violence as far as in his power.
Leaving it alone will be your best protection against it. No one is going to push you into it. Do what you want, on your own terms, peacefully and faithfully, and Governor Johnson won’t disturb you, but will protect you from violence as much as he can.
I presume that the conducting of a presidential election in Tennessee in strict accordance with the old Code of the State, is not now a possibility.
I assume that holding a presidential election in Tennessee strictly according to the old State Code is not possible anymore.
It is scarcely necessary to add, that if any election shall be held and any votes shall be cast in the State of Tennessee for President and Vice-President of the United States, it will belong, not to the military agents, nor yet to the Executive Department, but exclusively to another department of the Government, to determine whether they are entitled to be counted in conformity with the Constitution and laws of the United States.
It’s hardly worth mentioning that if an election takes place and votes are cast in the State of Tennessee for President and Vice-President of the United States, it won’t be up to the military agents or the Executive Department to decide this, but solely another department of the Government to determine if they should be counted according to the Constitution and laws of the United States.
Except it be to give protection against violence, I decline to interfere in any way with any presidential election.
Unless it's to protect against violence, I refuse to get involved in any presidential election.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL P. H. SHERIDAN. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, October 22, 1864
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL P. H. SHERIDAN. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, October 22, 1864
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERIDAN:
MAJOR-GENERAL SHERIDAN:
With great pleasure I tender to you and your brave army the thanks of the nation, and my own personal admiration and gratitude, for the month's operations in the Shenandoah Valley; and especially for the splendid work of October 19, 1864.
With great pleasure, I offer you and your courageous army the nation's thanks, along with my personal admiration and gratitude, for the past month's operations in the Shenandoah Valley; and especially for the outstanding efforts on October 19, 1864.
Your obedient servant,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. H. THOMAS. WASHINGTON, D. C., October 23, 1864 5
P.M.
PM
MAJOR-GENERAL THOMAS, Nashville, Tennessee:
MAJ. GEN. THOMAS, Nashville, TN:
I have received information to-day, having great appearance of authenticity, that there is to be a rebel raid into Western Kentucky; that it is to consist of four thousand infantry and three thousand cavalry, and is to start from Corinth, Mississippi, On the fourth day of November.
I got word today, looking quite credible, that there’s going to be a rebel raid into Western Kentucky. It’s going to include four thousand infantry and three thousand cavalry, and it’s set to start from Corinth, Mississippi, on November 4th.
A. LINCOLN, President.
A. LINCOLN, President.
Send copy to General Washburn at Memphis. A. L.
Send a copy to General Washburn in Memphis, A. L.
TELEGRAM TO T. T. DAVIS. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D.C., October 31,
1864.
1864.
HON. THOMAS T. DAVIS, Syracuse, N.Y.:
HON. THOMAS T. DAVIS, Syracuse, N.Y.:
I have ordered that Milton D. Norton be discharged on taking the oath. Please notify his mother.
I have ordered that Milton D. Norton be released upon taking the oath. Please inform his mother.
PROCLAMATION ADMITTING NEVADA INTO THE UNION
OCTOBER 31, 1864.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
A Proclamation
A Declaration
Whereas the Congress of the United States passed an act, which was approved on the 21st day of March last, entitled "An act to enable the people of Nevada to form a constitution and State government, and for the admission of such State into the Union on an equal footing with the original States;" and,
Whereas the United States Congress passed a law, which was approved on March 21st of last year, titled "An act to allow the people of Nevada to create a constitution and State government, and for the admission of that State into the Union on equal terms with the original States;" and,
Whereas the said constitution and State government have been formed, pursuant to the conditions prescribed by the fifth section of the act of Congress aforesaid, and the certificate required by the said act and also a copy of the constitution and ordinances have been submitted to the President of the United States:
Whereas the mentioned constitution and state government have been created according to the terms set forth in the fifth section of the aforementioned act of Congress, and the required certificate and a copy of the constitution and ordinances have been submitted to the President of the United States:
Now, therefore, be it known that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, in accordance with the duty imposed upon me by the act of Congress aforesaid, do hereby declare and proclaim that the said State of Nevada is admitted into the Union on an equal footing with the original States.
Now, therefore, let it be known that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, under the responsibility given to me by the aforementioned act of Congress, hereby declare and announce that the State of Nevada is admitted into the Union on the same level as the original States.
In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed..........
In witness whereof, I have set my hand here and caused the seal of the United States to be attached..........
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BURBRIDGE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 4, 1864
MAJOR-GENERAL BURBRIDGE, Lexington, Ky.
MAJ-GEN BURBRIDGE, Lexington, KY.
Suspend execution of all the deserters ordered to be executed on Sunday at Louisville, until further order, and send me the records in the cases. Acknowledge receipt.
Suspend the execution of all deserters scheduled for execution on Sunday in Louisville until further orders, and send me the records for these cases. Please confirm receipt.
TELEGRAM TO NAVAL OFFICER AT MOBILE BAY.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 6, 1864. 9 P.M.
MAJOR-GENERAL CANBY, New Orleans, La.:
MAJ. GEN. CANBY, New Orleans, LA:
Please forward with all possible despatch to the naval officer commanding at Mobile Bay the following order.
Please send the following order to the naval officer in charge at Mobile Bay as quickly as possible.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
(Inclosure.)
(Attachment.)
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 6, 1864.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 6, 1864.
NAVAL OFFICER IN COMMAND AT MOBILE BAY
NAVAL OFFICER IN CHARGE AT MOBILE BAY
Do not on any account, or on any showing of authority whatever, from whomsoever purporting to come, allow the blockade to be violated.
Do not, under any circumstances or due to any display of authority from anyone claiming to have power, allow the blockade to be breached.
TELEGRAM TO SAILORS' FAIR, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.
WASHINGTON, D. C., November 8, 1864.
TO THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THE SAILORS' FAIR, Boston, Massachusetts
TO THE MANAGING COMMITTEE OF THE SAILORS' FAIR, Boston, Massachusetts
Allow me to wish you a great success. With the old fame of the Navy made brighter in the present war you cannot fail. I name none lest I wrong others by omission. To all, from rear-admiral to honest Jack, I tender the nation's admiration and gratitude.
Allow me to wish you great success. With the Navy's historic reputation shining even brighter in the current war, you can't fail. I won't mention names to avoid leaving anyone out. To everyone, from rear-admiral to everyday sailor, I extend the nation's admiration and gratitude.
TELEGRAM TO A. H. RICE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 8, 1864.
HON. A. H. RICE, Boston, Massachusetts:
HON. A. H. RICE, Boston, Massachusetts:
Yours received. I have no other notice that the ox is mine. If it be really so, I present it to the Sailors' Fair as a contribution.
Yours received. I have no other information confirming that the ox is mine. If that is indeed the case, I’m donating it to the Sailors' Fair as a contribution.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY SEWARD. WASHINGTON, November 8, 1864.
HON. WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Auburn, New York:
News from Grant, Sherman, Thomas and Rosecrans satisfactory, but not important. Pirate Florida captured by the Wachusett October 7, on the coast of Brazil. The information is certain.
News from Grant, Sherman, Thomas, and Rosecrans is good, but not significant. The pirate Florida was captured by the Wachusett on October 7, off the coast of Brazil. This information is confirmed.
RESPONSE TO A SERENADE, NOVEMBER 9, 1864.
FRIENDS AND FELLOW-CITIZENS:—Even before I had been informed by you that this compliment was paid me by loyal citizens of Pennsylvania, friendly to me, I had inferred that you were of that portion of my countrymen who think that the best interests of the nation are to be subserved by the support of the present administration. I do not pretend to say that you, who think so, embrace all the patriotism and loyalty of the country, but I do believe, and I trust without personal interest, that the welfare of the country does require that such support and indorsement should be given.
FRIENDS AND FELLOW-CITIZENS:—Even before you let me know that this honor was given to me by loyal citizens of Pennsylvania who are supportive of me, I had already sensed that you were among those in my country who believe that the best interests of the nation are served by backing the current administration. I'm not claiming that everyone who feels this way embodies all the patriotism and loyalty of the country, but I truly believe, and I hope without any personal bias, that the nation's well-being does need this kind of support and endorsement.
I earnestly believe that the consequences of this day's work, if it be as you assume, and as now seems probable, will be to the lasting advantage, if not to the very salvation, of the country. I cannot at this hour say what has been the result of the election. But, whatever it may be, I have no desire to modify this opinion: that all who have labored to-day in behalf of the Union have wrought for the best interests of the country and the world; not only for the present, but for all future ages.
I truly believe that the outcomes of today's work, if it turns out as you suspect and as seems likely now, will greatly benefit, if not actually save, the country. I can't say right now what the results of the election are. But no matter what they are, I stand by my belief that everyone who worked today for the Union has done so for the best interests of the country and the world; not just for now, but for all future generations.
I am thankful to God for this approval of the people; but, while deeply grateful for this mark of their confidence in me, if I know my heart, my gratitude is free from any taint of personal triumph. I do not impugn the motives of any one opposed to me. It is no pleasure to me to triumph over any one, but I give thanks to the Almighty for this evidence of the people's resolution to stand by free government and the rights of humanity.
I am grateful to God for the people's approval; however, while I truly appreciate this sign of their trust in me, I can honestly say that my gratitude doesn't come from a sense of personal victory. I don't question the motives of anyone who disagrees with me. I don't take pleasure in defeating anyone; instead, I thank the Almighty for this proof that the people are committed to upholding free government and human rights.
TELEGRAM TO H. W. HOFFMAN. WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C. November 10,
1864.
1864.
H. HOFFMAN, Baltimore, Md.:
H. HOFFMAN, Baltimore, MD:
The Maryland soldiers in the Army of the Potomac cast a total vote of fourteen hundred and twenty-eight, out of which we get eleven hundred and sixty majority. This is directly from General Meade and General Grant.
The Maryland soldiers in the Army of the Potomac cast a total vote of 1,428, out of which we get an 1,160 majority. This is directly from General Meade and General Grant.
ON DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT
RESPONSE TO A SERENADE, NOVEMBER 10, 1864.
It has long been a grave question whether any government, not too strong for the liberties of its people, can be strong enough to maintain its existence in great emergencies. On this point the present rebellion brought our government to a severe test, and a presidential election occurring in regular course during the rebellion, added not a little to the strain.
It has long been a serious question whether any government, while not too oppressive for the freedoms of its people, can be strong enough to survive major crises. In this regard, the current rebellion put our government to a tough test, and having a presidential election occur as scheduled during the rebellion only added to the pressure.
If the loyal people united were put to the utmost of their strength by the rebellion, must they not fail when divided and partially paralyzed by a political war among themselves? But the election was a necessity. We cannot have free government without elections; and if the election could force us to forego or postpone a national election, it might fairly claim to have already conquered and ruined us. The strife of the election is but human nature practically applied to the facts of the case. What has occurred in this case must ever recur in similar cases. Human nature will not change. In any future great national trial, compared with the men of this, we will have as weak and as strong, as silly and as wise, as bad and as good. Let us, therefore, study the incidents of this as philosophy to learn wisdom from, and none of them as wrongs to be revenged.
If the loyal people who came together used all their strength against the rebellion, wouldn't they fail when they're divided and partially weakened by fighting among themselves? But holding elections is essential. We can't have a free government without them; and if the election forces us to skip or delay a national election, it could realistically claim to have already defeated and destroyed us. The conflict of the election is just human nature in action. What has happened in this case will happen again in similar situations. Human nature won't change. In any future major national crisis, compared to the people of this time, we'll see just as many weak and strong, foolish and wise, bad and good. So, let's examine the events of this as a source of wisdom and not as grievances to seek revenge for.
But the election, along with its incidental and undesirable strife, has done good, too. It has demonstrated that a people's government can sustain a national election in the midst of a great civil war. Until now, it has not been known to the world that this was a possibility. It shows, also, how sound and strong we still are. It shows that even among the candidates of the same party, he who is most devoted to the Union and most opposed to treason can receive most of the people's votes. It shows, also, to the extent yet known, that we have more men now than we had when the war began. Gold is good in its place; but living, brave, and patriotic men are better than gold.
But the election, despite the conflict and struggles that came with it, has also brought about positive outcomes. It has proven that a government by the people can hold a national election even during a significant civil war. Until now, the world didn't know this was possible. It also demonstrates how strong and resilient we still are. It shows that even among candidates from the same party, the one who is most committed to the Union and most against treason can earn the majority of the people's votes. Furthermore, it reveals, based on what we know so far, that we have more men now than we did when the war started. Money has its value; but living, brave, and patriotic individuals are worth more than gold.
But the rebellion continues, and, now that the election is over, may not all have a common interest to reunite in a common effort to save our common country? For my own part, I have striven and shall strive to avoid placing any obstacle in the way. So long as I have been here, I have not willingly planted a thorn in any man's bosom. While I am duly sensible to the high compliment of a re-election, and duly grateful, as I trust, to Almighty God, for having directed my countrymen to a right conclusion, as I think, for their good, it adds nothing to my satisfaction that any other man may be disappointed by the result.
But the rebellion goes on, and now that the election is over, can’t we all come together to save our country? Personally, I’ve worked hard to make sure I haven’t put any obstacles in the way. While I’ve been here, I haven’t intentionally hurt anyone. I truly appreciate the honor of being re-elected, and I’m grateful to God for guiding my fellow citizens to what I believe is the right choice for their benefit. However, it doesn’t make me any happier knowing that someone else might be upset by the outcome.
May I ask those who have not differed with me to join with me in this same spirit towards those who have? And now, let me close by asking three hearty cheers for our brave soldiers and seamen, and their gallant and skillful commanders.
Can I ask those who haven't disagreed with me to join me in this same spirit toward those who have? And now, let me finish by asking for three loud cheers for our brave soldiers and sailors, and their courageous and skilled leaders.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL S. O. BURBRIDGE. WASHINGTON, D.C., November 10, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL BURBRIDGE, Lexington, Ky.:
I have just received a telegram from Governor Bramlette saying: "General John B. Houston, a loyal man and prominent citizen, was arrested, and yesterday, started off by General Burbridge, to be sent beyond our lines by way of Catlettsburg, for no other offense than opposition to your re-election," and I have answered him as follows below, of which please take notice and report to me.
I just got a telegram from Governor Bramlette saying: "General John B. Houston, a loyal person and well-known citizen, was arrested, and yesterday, he was sent off by General Burbridge to be taken beyond our lines via Catlettsburg, for no reason other than opposing your re-election," and I have replied to him as follows below, so please take note and report back to me.
WASHINGTON, D.C., November 10, 1864. GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE, Frankfort, Ky.:
Yours of yesterday received. I can scarcely believe that General John B. Houston has been arrested "for no other offense than opposition to my re-election;" for, if that had been deemed sufficient cause of arrest, I should have heard of more than one arrest in Kentucky on election day. If, however, General Houston has been arrested for no other cause than opposition to my re-election, General Burbridge will discharge him at once, I sending him a copy of this as an order to that effect.
Your letter from yesterday has been received. I can hardly believe that General John B. Houston has been arrested "for no other reason than opposing my re-election;" because if that were considered enough reason for an arrest, I would have heard about more than one arrest in Kentucky on election day. However, if General Houston has been arrested solely for being against my re-election, General Burbridge will release him immediately, and I will send him a copy of this as an order to do so.
TO GENERAL S. A. HURLBUT.
(Private.)
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 14, 1864.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 14, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL HURLBUT:
MAJOR-GENERAL HURLBUT:
Few things since I have been here have impressed me more painfully than what, for four or five months past, has appeared a bitter military opposition to the new State government of Louisiana. I still indulged some hope that I was mistaken in the fact; but copies of a correspondence on the subject between General Canby and yourself, and shown me to-day, dispel that hope. A very fair proportion of the people of Louisiana have inaugurated a new State government, making an excellent new constitution—better for the poor black man than we have in Illinois. This was done under military protection, directed by me, in the belief, still sincerely entertained, that with such a nucleus around which to build we could get the State into position again sooner than otherwise. In this belief a general promise of protection and support, applicable alike to Louisiana and other States, was given in the last annual message. During the formation of the new government and constitution they were supported by nearly every loyal person, and opposed by every secessionist. And this support and this opposition, from the respective standpoints of the parties, was perfectly consistent and logical. Every Unionist ought to wish the new government to succeed; and every disunionist must desire it to fail. Its failure would gladden the heart of Slidell in Europe, and of every enemy of the old flag in the world. Every advocate of slavery naturally desires to see blasted and crushed the liberty promised the black man by the new constitution. But why General Canby and General Hurlbut should join on the same side is to me incomprehensible.
Few things since I've been here have troubled me more than the bitter military opposition to the new State government of Louisiana that's been going on for the past four to five months. I still held onto some hope that I was mistaken about this situation; however, copies of correspondence on the matter between General Canby and yourself, which I saw today, have dashed that hope. A significant number of people in Louisiana have established a new State government and created an excellent new constitution—one that's better for the poor Black man than the one we have in Illinois. This was done under military protection, which I directed, believing sincerely that with such a foundation, we could get the State back on track sooner. Based on this belief, I provided a general promise of protection and support, applicable to Louisiana and other States, in my last annual message. During the creation of the new government and constitution, they had the backing of nearly every loyal person and were opposed by every secessionist. This support and opposition were entirely consistent and logical from each side's perspective. Every Unionist should want the new government to succeed, and every disunionist must want it to fail. Its failure would bring joy to Slidell in Europe and every enemy of the old flag worldwide. Every pro-slavery advocate obviously wants to see the liberty promised to Black men in the new constitution destroyed. But I cannot understand why General Canby and General Hurlbut would align themselves on the same side.
Of course, in the condition of things at New Orleans, the military must not be thwarted by the civil authority; but when the Constitutional Convention, for what it deems a breach of privilege, arrests an editor in no way connected with the military, the military necessity for insulting the convention and forcibly discharging the editor is difficult to perceive. Neither is the military necessity for protecting the people against paying large salaries fixed by a legislature of their own choosing very apparent. Equally difficult to perceive is the military necessity for forcibly interposing to prevent a bank from loaning its own money to the State. These things, if they have occurred, are, at the best, no better than gratuitous hostility. I wish I could hope that they may be shown not to have occurred. To make assurance against misunderstanding, I repeat that in the existing condition of things in Louisiana, the military must not be thwarted by the civil authority; and I add that on points of difference the commanding general must be judge and master. But I also add that in the exercise of this judgment and control, a purpose, obvious, and scarcely unavowed, to transcend all military necessity, in order to crush out the civil government, will not be overlooked.
Of course, given the situation in New Orleans, the military shouldn't be obstructed by the civil authorities. However, when the Constitutional Convention arrests an editor unrelated to the military for what it considers a breach of privilege, it's hard to understand why the military would feel the need to insult the convention and forcibly release the editor. Similarly, it's not clear why the military needs to protect people from paying large salaries set by a legislature they chose themselves. It’s also difficult to see the military’s necessity in intervening to stop a bank from lending its own money to the State. If these things have happened, they can only be seen as unnecessary hostility. I wish I could believe that they haven’t happened. To clarify and avoid any misunderstandings, I want to emphasize that under the current circumstances in Louisiana, the military must not be hindered by the civil authority, and I also maintain that on matters of disagreement, the commanding general must have the final say. However, I want to stress that if there’s a clear agenda to go beyond military necessity in order to dismantle the civil government, that will not be ignored.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
REPLY TO MARYLAND UNION COMMITTEE, NOVEMBER 17, 1864.
The President, in reply, said that he had to confess he had been duly notified of the intention to make this friendly call some days ago, and in this he had had a fair opportunity afforded to be ready with a set speech; but he had not prepared one, being too busy for that purpose. He would say, however, that he was gratified with the result of the presidential election. He had kept as near as he could to the exercise of his best judgment for the interest of the whole country, and to have the seal of approbation stamped on the course he had pursued was exceedingly grateful to his feelings. He thought he could say, in as large a sense as any other man, that his pleasure consisted in belief that the policy he had pursued was the best, if not the only one, for the safety of the country.
The President replied that he had to admit he was informed about the planned friendly visit a few days earlier, which gave him a fair chance to prepare a formal speech. However, he hadn't prepared one because he was too busy for that. He did want to express that he was pleased with the outcome of the presidential election. He had tried to use his best judgment for the good of the entire country, and having his actions approved was very rewarding for him. He believed he could fairly say that his satisfaction came from the conviction that the policy he followed was the best, if not the only option, for the country's safety.
He had said before, and now repeated, that he indulged in no feeling of triumph over any man who thought or acted differently from himself. He had no such feeling toward any living man. When he thought of Maryland, in particular, he was of the opinion that she had more than double her share in what had occurred in the recent elections. The adoption of a free-State constitution was a greater thing than the part taken by the people of the State in the presidential election. He would any day have stipulated to lose Maryland in the presidential election to save it by the adoption of a free-State constitution, because the presidential election comes every four years, while that is a thing which, being done, cannot be undone. He therefore thought that in that they had a victory for the right worth a great deal more than their part in the presidential election, though of the latter he thought highly. He had once before said, but would say again, that those who have differed with us and opposed us will see that the result of the presidential election is better for their own good than if they had been successful.
He had previously stated, and now reiterated, that he didn't feel any sense of triumph over anyone who thought or acted differently from him. He had no such feelings toward any living person. When he thought about Maryland, in particular, he believed that she played more than her fair share in what happened in the recent elections. The adoption of a free-state constitution was a bigger deal than the role the people of the state played in the presidential election. He would gladly have accepted losing Maryland in the presidential election if it meant securing the state by adopting a free-state constitution, because the presidential election happens every four years, while the constitution, once adopted, cannot be reversed. Therefore, he felt that in this instance, they achieved a victory for what was right that was worth much more than their involvement in the presidential election, even though he still held the latter in high regard. He had said this before, but would say it again: those who disagreed with us and opposed us would see that the outcome of the presidential election was better for their own interests than if they had been victorious.
Thanking the committee for their compliment, he brought his brief speech to a close.
Thanking the committee for their praise, he wrapped up his short speech.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING BLOCKADE, NOVEMBER 19, 1864
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas by my proclamation of the 19th of April, 1861, it was declared that the ports of certain States, including those of Norfolk, in the State of Virginia, Fernandina and Pensacola, in the State of Florida, were, for reasons therein set forth, intended to be placed under blockade; and:
Whereas in my announcement on April 19, 1861, it was stated that the ports of certain states, including Norfolk in Virginia, and Fernandina and Pensacola in Florida, were to be blockaded for the reasons outlined in that proclamation; and:
Whereas the said ports were subsequently blockaded accordingly, but having for some time past been in the military possession of the United States, it is deeemd advisable that they should be opened to domestic and foreign commerce:
Whereas those ports were later blockaded as planned, but having been under the military control of the United States for some time now, it is considered advisable that they should be opened to both domestic and foreign trade:
Now, therefore, be it known that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, pursuant to the authority in me vested by the fifth section of the act of Congress approved on the 13th of July, 1861, entitled "An act further to provide for the collection of duties on imports, and for other purposes," do hereby declare that the blockade of the said ports of Norfolk, Fernandina, and Pensacola shall so far cease and determine, from and after the first day of December next, that commercial intercourse with those ports, except as to persons, things, and information contraband of war, may, from that time, be carried on, subject to the laws of the United States, to the limitations and in pursuance of the regulations which may be prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury, and to such military and naval regulations as are now in force, or may hereafter be found necessary.
Now, therefore, let it be known that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, under the authority given to me by the fifth section of the act of Congress approved on July 13, 1861, titled "An act further to provide for the collection of duties on imports, and for other purposes," hereby declare that the blockade of the ports of Norfolk, Fernandina, and Pensacola will cease and end from December 1st onward, so that commercial trade with those ports, except for persons, items, and information that are considered contraband of war, may resume from that time, subject to the laws of the United States, within the limitations, and following the regulations that may be set by the Secretary of the Treasury, as well as to any military and naval regulations that are currently in effect or may be deemed necessary in the future.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed. Done at the city of Washington, this nineteenth day of November, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-four, and of the independence of the United States the eighty-ninth.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed. Done at the city of Washington, this 19th day of November, in the year 1864, and of the independence of the United States the eighty-ninth.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
FIVE-STAR MOTHER
TO MRS. BIXBY.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 21, 1864.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 21, 1864.
MRS. BIXBY, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mrs. Bixby, Boston, MA.
DEAR MADAM:—I have been shown in the files of the War Department a statement of the Adjutant-General of Massachusetts that you are the mother of five sons who have died gloriously on the field of battle. I feel how weak and fruitless must be any words of mine which should attempt to beguile you from the grief of a loss so overwhelming. But I cannot refrain from tendering to you the consolation that may be found in the thanks of the Republic they died to save. I pray that our Heavenly Father may assuage the anguish of your bereavement, and leave you only the cherished memory of the loved and lost, and the solemn pride that must be yours to have laid so costly a sacrifice upon the altar of freedom.
DEAR MADAM:—I have come across a statement in the War Department files from the Adjutant-General of Massachusetts that you are the mother of five sons who have died heroically in battle. I realize how insufficient any words of mine might be in trying to ease the pain of such a profound loss. However, I feel compelled to offer you the comfort that can be found in the gratitude of the nation they fought to protect. I hope that our Heavenly Father may soothe the pain of your grief and leave you with only the treasured memories of your loved ones, along with the deep pride that comes from having made such a significant sacrifice for the cause of freedom.
Yours very sincerely and respectfully,
Sincerely and respectfully,
TO J. PHILLIPS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, November 21, 1864.
DEACON JOHN PHILLIPS.
Deacon John Phillips.
MY DEAR SIR:—I have heard of the incident at the polls in your town, in which you acted so honorable a part, and I take the liberty of writing to you to express my personal gratitude for the compliment paid me by the suffrage of a citizen so venerable.
MY DEAR SIR:—I have heard about the incident at the polls in your town, where you played such an honorable role, and I’m writing to express my personal gratitude for the compliment given to me by the vote of such a respected citizen.
The example of such devotion to civic duties in one whose days have already been extended an average lifetime beyond the Psalmist's limit, cannot but be valuable and fruitful. It is not for myself only, but for the country which you have in your sphere served so long and so well, that I thank you.
The example of such commitment to civic duties from someone whose life has already surpassed the Psalmist's limit by an average lifetime is undoubtedly valuable and impactful. I thank you not just for myself, but for the country you have served so long and so well in your role.
Your friend and servant,
Your friend and helper,
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE. WASHINGTON, D. C. NOVEMBER 22, 1864.
GOVERNOR BRAMLETTE, Frankfort, Ky.:
Yours of to-day received. It seems that Lieutenant-Governor Jacobs and Colonel Wolford are stationary now. General Sudarth and Mr. Hodges are here, and the Secretary of War and myself are trying to devise means of pacification and harmony for Kentucky, which we hope to effect soon, now that the passion-exciting subject of the election is past.
Your letter from today has been received. It looks like Lieutenant-Governor Jacobs and Colonel Wolford are currently staying put. General Sudarth and Mr. Hodges are here, and the Secretary of War and I are working on ways to bring peace and harmony to Kentucky, which we hope to achieve soon now that the heated topic of the election is behind us.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR CURTIN, WASHINGTON, D.C., NOVEMBER 25, 1864
GOVERNOR CURTIN, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania;
I have no knowledge, information, or belief, that three States—or any States, offer to resume allegiance.
I have no knowledge, information, or belief that three states—or any states—are offering to resume allegiance.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL ROSECRANS. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON D.C., NOV.
26, 1864 MAJOR-GENERAL ROSECRANS:
February 26, 1864 MAJOR-GENERAL ROSECRANS:
Please telegraph me briefly on what charge and evidence Mrs. Anna B. Martin has been sent to the penitentiary at Alton.
Please send me a brief message about the charge and evidence against Mrs. Anna B. Martin that led to her being sent to the penitentiary in Alton.
MEMORANDUM,
DECEMBER 3, 1864.
On Thursday of last week, two ladies from Tennessee came before the President, asking the release of their husbands held as prisoners of war at Johnson's Island. They were put off until Friday, when they came again, and were again put off until Saturday. At each of the interviews one of the ladies urged that her husband was a religious man, and on Saturday the President ordered the release of the prisoners, when he said to this lady: "You say your husband is a religious man; tell him when you meet him, that I say I am not much of a judge of religion, but that, in my opinion, the religion that sets men to rebel and fight against their own government, because, as they think, that government does not sufficiently help some men to eat their bread in the sweat of other men's faces, is not the sort of religion upon which people can get to heaven."
Last Thursday, two women from Tennessee met with the President, requesting the release of their husbands who were prisoners of war at Johnson's Island. They were told to come back on Friday, only to be postponed again until Saturday. During each meeting, one of the women insisted that her husband was a religious man, and on Saturday, the President agreed to release the prisoners, saying to this woman: "You say your husband is a religious man; when you see him, tell him I’m not much of a judge of religion, but in my opinion, a religion that encourages people to rebel and fight against their own government, because they believe that government doesn’t do enough to help some people earn a living off the hard work of others, isn’t the kind of religion that leads to heaven."
ORDER CONCERNING THE STEAMER "FUNAYMA SOLACE."
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 3, 1864.
A war steamer, called the Funayma Solace, having been built in this country, for the Japanese government and at the instance of that government, it is deemed to comport with the public interest, in view of the unsettled condition of the relations of the United States with that Empire, that the steamer should not be allowed to proceed to Japan. If, however, the Secretary of the Navy should ascertain that the steamer is adapted to our service, he is authorized to purchase her, but the purchase money will be held in trust toward satisfying any valid claims which may be presented by the Japanese on account of the construction of the steamer and the failure to deliver the same, as above set forth.
A warship, named the Funayma Solace, was built in this country for the Japanese government and at their request. Given the unstable relationship between the United States and Japan, it's considered to be in the public's best interest that the ship should not be allowed to go to Japan. However, if the Secretary of the Navy finds that the ship is suitable for our needs, he is authorized to buy it. The payment for the ship will be held in trust to cover any valid claims that Japan may present regarding the ship's construction and the failure to deliver it as mentioned above.
A. LINCOLN. MESSAGE TO CONGRESS.
A. LINCOLN. MESSAGE TO CONGRESS.
WASHINGTON CITY, December 5, 1864
WASHINGTON, December 5, 1864
TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
In conformity to the law of July 16, 1862, I most cordially recommend that Captain John A. Winslow, United States Navy, receive a vote of thanks from Congress for the skill and gallantry exhibited by him in the brilliant action whilst in command of the United States steamer Keaysarge, which led to the total destruction of the piratical craft Alabama, on the 19th of June, 1864., a vessel superior in tonnage, superior in number of guns, and superior in number of crew.
In accordance with the law of July 16, 1862, I wholeheartedly recommend that Captain John A. Winslow of the United States Navy receive a vote of thanks from Congress for the skill and bravery he displayed during the impressive battle while in command of the United States steamer Kearsarge, which resulted in the complete destruction of the pirate ship Alabama on June 19, 1864. The Alabama was larger in size, had more guns, and had a bigger crew.
This recommendation is specially made in order to comply with the requirements of the ninth section of the aforesaid act, which is in the following words, viz:
This recommendation is specifically made to meet the requirements of the ninth section of the mentioned act, which states:
That any line officer of the navy or marine corps may be advanced one grade, if, upon recommendation by the President by name he receives the thanks of Congress for highly distinguished conduct in conflict with the enemy, or far extraordinary heroism in the line of his profession.
That any line officer of the Navy or Marine Corps can be promoted one rank if, upon the President's recommendation by name, he receives a commendation from Congress for exceptional conduct in battle against the enemy, or for extraordinary heroism in his professional duties.
MESSAGE TO CONGRESS.
WASHINGTON CITY, December 5, 1864.
TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
In conformity to the law of July 16, 1862, I most cordially recommend that Lieutenant William B. Gushing, United States Navy, receive a vote of thanks from Congress for his important, gallant, and perilous achievement in destroying the rebel ironclad steamer Albemarle on the night of the 27th of October, 1864., at Plymouth, N. C.
According to the law of July 16, 1862, I wholeheartedly recommend that Lieutenant William B. Gushing, United States Navy, receive a vote of thanks from Congress for his significant, brave, and risky accomplishment in destroying the rebel ironclad steamer Albemarle on the night of October 27, 1864, in Plymouth, N.C.
The destruction of so formidable a vessel, which had resisted the continued attacks of a number of our vessels on former occasions, is an important event touching our future naval and military operations, and would reflect honor on any officer, and redounds to the credit of this young officer and the few brave comrades who assisted in this successful and daring undertaking.
The destruction of such a powerful ship, which had withstood repeated attacks from several of our vessels before, is a significant event that impacts our future naval and military operations. It would bring honor to any officer and is a testament to the bravery of this young officer and the few courageous comrades who helped in this successful and bold mission.
This recommendation is specially made in order to comply with the requirements of the ninth section of the Aforesaid act, which is in the following words, namely:
This recommendation is specifically made to meet the requirements of the ninth section of the aforementioned act, which states:
That any line officer of the navy or marine corps may be advanced one grade if upon recommendation of the President by name he receives the thanks of Congress for highly distinguished conduct in conflict with the enemy, or for extraordinary heroism in the line of his profession.
Any line officer of the navy or marine corps can be promoted one rank if they receive a personal recommendation from the President along with the thanks of Congress for exceptionally distinguished conduct in combat with the enemy, or for extraordinary heroism in their line of duty.
ANNUAL MESSAGE TO CONGRESS,
DECEMBER 6, 1864.
FELLOW-CITIZENS OF THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
Fellow citizens of the Senate and House of Representatives:
Again the blessings of health and abundant harvests claim our profoundest gratitude to Almighty God.
Once again, we express our deepest gratitude to God for the blessings of good health and plentiful harvests.
The condition of our foreign affairs is reasonably satisfactory.
The state of our foreign affairs is fairly good.
Mexico continues to be a theater of civil war. While our political relations with that country have undergone no change, we have at the same time strictly maintained neutrality between the belligerents.
Mexico remains a battleground for civil war. Although our political relations with that country have not changed, we have also strictly upheld neutrality between the opposing sides.
At the request of the States of Costa Rica and Nicaragua, a competent engineer has been authorized to make a survey of the river San Juan and the port of San Juan. It is a source of much satisfaction that the difficulties which for a moment excited some political apprehensions and caused a closing of the interoceanic transit route have been amicably adjusted, and that there is a good prospect that the route will soon be reopened with an increase of capacity and adaptation. We could not exaggerate either the commercial or the political importance of that great improvement.
At the request of the governments of Costa Rica and Nicaragua, a qualified engineer has been authorized to survey the San Juan River and the port of San Juan. It’s very satisfying that the issues that briefly raised some political concerns and led to the closure of the interoceanic transit route have been resolved peacefully, and there’s a promising outlook that the route will soon reopen with increased capacity and upgrades. We cannot overstate the commercial and political significance of this major improvement.
It would be doing injustice to an important South American State not to acknowledge the directness, frankness, and cordiality with which the United States of Colombia have entered into intimate relations with this government. A claims convention has been constituted to complete the unfinished work of the one which closed its session in 1861.
It would be unfair to overlook the straightforwardness, honesty, and friendliness with which the United States of Colombia has developed close ties with this government. A claims convention has been established to finish the work that the one which ended its session in 1861 left incomplete.
The new liberal constitution of Venezuela having gone into effect with the universal acquiescence of the people, the government under it has been recognized and diplomatic intercourse with it has opened in a cordial and friendly spirit. The long-deferred Aves Island claim has been satisfactorily paid and discharged.
The new liberal constitution of Venezuela has taken effect with the universal agreement of the people, and the government under it has been recognized while diplomatic relations have begun in a friendly and cordial manner. The long-delayed Aves Island claim has been satisfactorily resolved and settled.
Mutual payments have been made of the claims awarded by the late joint commission for the settlement of claims between the United States and Peru. An earnest and cordial friendship continues to exist between the two countries, and such efforts as were in my power have been used to remove misunderstanding, and avert a threatened war between Peru and Spain.
Mutual payments have been made for the claims awarded by the late joint commission for settling claims between the United States and Peru. A sincere and friendly relationship continues to thrive between the two countries, and I've done everything I can to clear up misunderstandings and prevent a potential war between Peru and Spain.
Our relations are of the most friendly nature with Chile, the Argentine Republic, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Paraguay, San Salvador, and Haiti.
Our relationships with Chile, Argentina, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Paraguay, El Salvador, and Haiti are very friendly.
During the past year no differences of any kind have arisen with any of these republics, and on the other hand, their sympathies with the United States are constantly expressed with cordiality and earnestness.
In the past year, there have been no disagreements of any kind with any of these republics. On the other hand, their support for the United States is consistently expressed with warmth and sincerity.
The claim arising from the seizure of the cargo of the brig Macedonian in 1821 has been paid in full by the Government of Chile.
The claim from the seizure of the cargo of the brig Macedonian in 1821 has been fully paid by the Government of Chile.
Civil war continues in the Spanish part of San Domingo, apparently without prospect of an early close.
Civil war is still ongoing in the Spanish part of San Domingo, seemingly with no hope for a quick resolution.
Official correspondence has been freely opened with Liberia, and it gives us a pleasing view of social and political progress in that republic. It may be expected to derive new vigor from American influence improved by the rapid disappearance of slavery in the United States.
Official communication has been established with Liberia, and it offers us an encouraging perspective on social and political progress in that republic. It is likely to gain new strength from American influence, enhanced by the swift decline of slavery in the United States.
I solicit your authority to furnish to the republic a gunboat, at moderate cost, to be reimbursed to the United States by instalments. Such a vessel is needed for the safety of that state against the native African races, and in Liberian hands it would be more effective in arresting the African slave-trade than a squadron in our own hands. The possession of the least organized naval force would stimulate a generous ambition in the republic, and the confidence which we should manifest by furnishing it would win forbearance and favor toward the colony from all civilized nations.
I request your permission to provide the republic with a gunboat at a reasonable cost, to be paid back to the United States in installments. This vessel is essential for the safety of that state against the local African populations, and in the hands of Liberia, it would be much more effective in combating the African slave trade than a fleet under our control. Having even a small naval force would inspire a commendable ambition in the republic, and the support we show by providing it would earn respect and goodwill toward the colony from all civilized nations.
The proposed overland telegraph between America and Europe, by the way of Bering Straits and Asiatic Russia, which was sanctioned by Congress at the last session, has been undertaken, under very favorable circumstances, by an association of American citizens, with the cordial good-will and support as well of this Government as of those of Great Britain and Russia. Assurances have been received from most of the South American States of their high appreciation of the enterprise and their readiness to co-operate in constructing lines tributary to that world-encircling communication. I learn with much satisfaction that the noble design of a telegraphic communication between the eastern coast of America and Great Britain has been renewed, with full expectation of its early accomplishment.
The proposed overland telegraph between America and Europe, via Bering Straits and Asia, which was approved by Congress in the last session, is being pursued under very favorable circumstances by a group of American citizens, with the enthusiastic support of both our government and those of Great Britain and Russia. We have received positive responses from most South American countries expressing their strong support for the project and their willingness to help build lines connected to this global communication network. I’m pleased to hear that the ambitious plan for a telegraphic connection between the eastern coast of America and Great Britain has been revived, with high hopes of its swift completion.
Thus it is hoped that with the return of domestic peace the country will be able to resume with energy and advantage its former high career of commerce and civilization.
Thus, it is hoped that with the return of domestic peace, the country will be able to energetically and beneficially resume its former path of commerce and civilization.
Our very popular and estimable representative in Egypt died in April last. An unpleasant altercation which arose between the temporary incumbent of the office and the Government of the Pasha resulted in a suspension of intercourse. The evil was promptly corrected on the arrival of the successor in the consulate, and our relations with Egypt, as well as our relations with the Barbary Powers, are entirely satisfactory.
Our well-respected and popular representative in Egypt passed away last April. A disagreement between the temporary office holder and the Pasha's government led to a pause in communication. Fortunately, this issue was quickly resolved when the new consul arrived, and our relationships with Egypt, as well as with the Barbary Powers, are now completely satisfactory.
The rebellion which has so long been flagrant in China has at last been suppressed, with the co-operating good offices of this Government and of the other Western commercial States. The judicial consular establishment there has become very difficult and onerous, and it will need legislative revision to adapt it to the extension of our commerce and to the more intimate intercourse which has been instituted with the Government and people of that vast Empire. China seems to be accepting with hearty good-will the conventional laws which regulate commercial and social intercourse among the Western nations.
The rebellion that has been so obvious in China has finally been put down, thanks to the support of this government and other Western commercial nations. The judicial consular system there has become very challenging and burdensome, and it will require legislative changes to better fit our expanding trade and closer relations with the government and people of that huge country. China appears to be warmly accepting the conventional laws that govern trade and social interactions among Western nations.
Owing to the peculiar situation of Japan and the anomalous form of its Government, the action of that empire in performing treaty stipulations is inconstant and capricious. Nevertheless, good progress has been effected by the Western powers, moving with enlightened concert. Our own pecuniary claims have been allowed or put in course of settlement, and the inland sea has been reopened to commerce. There is reason also to believe that these proceedings have increased rather than diminished the friendship of Japan toward the United States.
Due to Japan's unique situation and its unusual government structure, the country's actions regarding treaty obligations are often inconsistent and unpredictable. However, the Western powers have made good progress by working together with a shared understanding. Our financial claims have been accepted or are in the process of being resolved, and the inland sea has been reopened to trade. There's also reason to believe that these developments have strengthened, rather than weakened, Japan's friendship with the United States.
The ports of Norfolk, Fernandina, and Pensacola have been opened by proclamation. It is hoped that foreign merchants will now consider whether it is not safer and more profitable to themselves, as well as just to the United States, to resort to these and other open ports than it is to pursue, through many hazards and at vast cost, a contraband trade with other ports which are closed, if not by actual military occupation, at least by a lawful and effective blockade.
The ports of Norfolk, Fernandina, and Pensacola have been opened by proclamation. It is hoped that foreign merchants will now think about whether it is safer and more profitable for them, as well as fair to the United States, to use these and other open ports rather than face the many risks and high costs of engaging in a contraband trade with other ports that are closed, if not through actual military occupation, then at least by a legal and effective blockade.
For myself, I have no doubt of the power and duty of the Executive, under the law of nations, to exclude enemies of the human race from an asylum in the United States. If Congress should think that proceedings in such cases lack the authority of law, or ought to be further regulated by it, I recommend that provision be made for effectually preventing foreign slave traders from acquiring domicile and facilities for their criminal occupation in our country.
For my part, I have no doubt about the power and responsibility of the Executive, under international law, to keep enemies of humanity from finding refuge in the United States. If Congress believes that actions in these cases lack legal authority or need more regulation, I suggest that measures be put in place to effectively stop foreign slave traders from setting up residence and resources for their illegal activities in our country.
It is possible that if it were a new and open question the maritime powers, with the lights they now enjoy, would not concede the privileges of a naval belligerent to the insurgents of the United States, destitute, as they are, and always have been, equally of ships of war and of ports and harbors. Disloyal emissaries have been neither assiduous nor more successful during the last year than they were before that time in their efforts, under favor of that privilege, to embroil our country in foreign wars. The desire and determination of the governments of the maritime states to defeat that design are believed to be as sincere as and can not be more earnest than our own. Nevertheless, unforeseen political difficulties have arisen, especially in Brazilian and British ports and on the northern boundary of the United States, which have required, and are likely to continue to require, the practice of constant vigilance and a just and conciliatory spirit on the part of the United States, as well as of the nations concerned and their governments.
It's likely that if this were a new and open question, the naval powers, with the knowledge they have now, would not grant the insurgents of the United States the rights of a naval belligerent, considering they are lacking in both warships and ports. Disloyal agents have not been any more diligent or successful in the past year than they were previously in their attempts, taking advantage of that privilege, to drag our country into foreign wars. The maritime governments' desire and determination to thwart that plan are believed to be as genuine and earnest as our own. However, unexpected political challenges have emerged, particularly in Brazilian and British ports and along the northern border of the United States, which have required, and are likely to continue to require, ongoing vigilance and a fair and conciliatory attitude from the United States, as well as from the nations involved and their governments.
Commissioners have been appointed under the treaty with Great Britain on the adjustment of the claims of the Hudson Bay and Puget Sound Agricultural Companies, in Oregon, and are now proceeding to the execution of the trust assigned to them.
Commissioners have been appointed under the treaty with Great Britain to handle the claims of the Hudson Bay and Puget Sound Agricultural Companies in Oregon and are now moving forward with their assigned duties.
In view of the insecurity of life and property in the region adjacent to the Canadian border, by reason of recent assaults and depredations committed by inimical and desperate persons who are harbored there, it has been thought proper to give notice that after the expiration of six months, the period conditionally stipulated in the existing arrangement with Great Britain, the United States must hold themselves at liberty to increase their naval armament upon the Lakes if they shall find that proceeding necessary. The condition of the border will necessarily come into consideration in connection with the question of continuing or modifying the rights of transit from Canada through the United States, as well as the regulation of imposts, which were temporarily established by the reciprocity treaty of the 5th June, 1854.
Due to the insecurity of life and property in the area near the Canadian border, caused by recent attacks and damage carried out by hostile and desperate individuals who are being sheltered there, it has been deemed necessary to inform that after six months, the period agreed upon in the current arrangement with Great Britain, the United States will consider itself free to increase its naval forces on the Lakes if it finds it necessary. The situation at the border will be considered in relation to the question of whether to continue or change the rights of transit from Canada through the United States, as well as the management of tariffs that were temporarily set up by the reciprocity treaty of June 5, 1854.
I desire, however, to be understood while making this statement that the colonial authorities of Canada are not deemed to be intentionally unjust or unfriendly toward the United States, but, on the contrary, there is every reason to expect that, with the approval of the Imperial Government, they will take the necessary measures to prevent new incursions across the border.
I want to make it clear while saying this that the colonial authorities of Canada are not seen as deliberately unfair or hostile toward the United States. On the contrary, there's every reason to believe that, with the support of the Imperial Government, they will take the necessary steps to stop new crossings of the border.
The act passed at the last session for the encouragement of immigration has so far as was possible been put into operation. It seems to need amendment which will enable the officers of the Government to prevent the practice of frauds against the immigrants while on their way and on their arrival in the ports, so as to secure them here a free choice of avocations and places of settlement. A liberal disposition toward this great national policy is manifested by most of the European States, and ought to be reciprocated on our part by giving the immigrants effective national protection. I regard our immigrants as one of the principal replenishing streams which are appointed by Providence to repair the ravages of internal war and its wastes of national strength and health. All that is necessary is to secure the flow of that stream in its present fullness, and to that end the Government must in every way make it manifest that it neither needs nor designs to impose involuntary military service upon those who come from other lands to cast their lot in our country. The financial affairs of the Government have been successfully administered during the last year. The legislation of the last session of Congress has beneficially affected the revenues, although sufficient time has not yet elapsed to experience the full effect of several of the provisions of the acts of Congress imposing increased taxation.
The law passed at the last session to encourage immigration has been implemented as much as possible. It seems to need updates that will allow government officials to prevent fraud against immigrants during their journey and upon their arrival at the ports, ensuring they have the freedom to choose their jobs and where to settle. Most European countries show a generous attitude towards this major national policy, and we should respond by providing immigrants with real national protection. I see our immigrants as a key source of renewal that Providence has provided to heal the damage from internal conflicts and restore our national strength and health. All we need to do is ensure that this flow continues at its current level, and to achieve that, the government must clearly show that it neither needs nor intends to impose involuntary military service on those coming from other countries to make a new life here. The government’s finances have been managed well over the past year. The legislation from the last session of Congress has positively impacted revenues, although it hasn't been long enough yet to see the full effects of several provisions related to increased taxation.
The receipts during the year from all sources, upon the basis of warrants signed by the Secretary of the Treasury, including loans and the balance in the Treasury on the 1st day of July, 1863, were $1,394,196,007.62, and the aggregate disbursements, upon the same basis, were $1,298,056,101.89, leaving a balance in the Treasury, as shown by warrants, of $96,739,905.73.
The total income for the year from all sources, based on warrants signed by the Secretary of the Treasury, including loans and the balance in the Treasury on July 1, 1863, was $1,394,196,007.62. The total expenses, based on the same criteria, were $1,298,056,101.89, which left a balance in the Treasury, as indicated by the warrants, of $96,739,905.73.
Deduct from these amounts the amount of the principal of the public debt redeemed and the amount of issues in substitution therefor, and the actual cash operations of the Treasury were: receipts, $884,076,646.57; disbursements, $865,234,087.86; which leaves a cash balance in the Treasury of $18,842,558.71.
Deduct from these amounts the principal of the public debt that has been paid off and the amount of new issues that replaced it, and the actual cash operations of the Treasury were: receipts, $884,076,646.57; disbursements, $865,234,087.86; which leaves a cash balance in the Treasury of $18,842,558.71.
Of the receipts there were derived from customs $102,316,152.99, from lands $588,333.29, from direct taxes $475,648.96, from internal revenue $109,741,134.10, from miscellaneous sources $47,511,448.10, and from loans applied to actual expenditures, including former balance, $623,443,929.13.
Of the total revenue, $102,316,152.99 came from customs, $588,333.29 from land sales, $475,648.96 from direct taxes, $109,741,134.10 from internal revenue, $47,511,448.10 from various sources, and $623,443,929.13 from loans used for actual expenses, including the previous balance.
There were disbursed for the civil service $27,505,599.46, for pensions and Indians $7,517,930.97, for the War Department $690,791,842.97, for the Navy Department $85,733,292.77, for interest on the public debt $53,685,421.69, making an aggregate of $865,234,087.86, and leaving a balance in the Treasury of $18,842,558.71, as before stated.
There were expenditures for the civil service totaling $27,505,599.46, for pensions and Native American affairs $7,517,930.97, for the War Department $690,791,842.97, for the Navy Department $85,733,292.77, and for interest on the public debt $53,685,421.69, resulting in a total of $865,234,087.86, and leaving a balance in the Treasury of $18,842,558.71, as previously mentioned.
For the actual receipts and disbursements for the first quarter and the estimated receipts and disbursements for the three remaining quarters of the current fiscal year, and the general operations of the Treasury in detail, I refer you to the report of the Secretary of the Treasury. I concur with him in the opinion that the proportion of moneys required to meet the expenses consequent upon the war derived from taxation should be still further increased; and I earnestly invite your attention to this subject to the end that there be such additional legislation as shall be required to meet the just expectations of the Secretary.
For the actual income and expenses for the first quarter, along with the estimated income and expenses for the next three quarters of the current fiscal year, and the overall operations of the Treasury in detail, I direct you to the report from the Secretary of the Treasury. I agree with him that the share of money needed to cover the costs of the war coming from taxes should be increased further; and I strongly encourage you to focus on this issue so that any additional legislation needed can be enacted to meet the valid expectations of the Secretary.
The public debt on the first day of July last, as appears by the books of the Treasury, amounted to $1,740,690,489.49. Probably, should the war continue for another year, that amount may be increased by not far from $500,000,000. Held, as it is, for the most part by our own people, it has become a substantial branch of national, though private, property. For obvious reasons the more nearly this property can be distributed among all the people the better. To favor such general distribution, greater inducements to become owners might, perhaps, with good effect and without injury be presented to persons of limited means. With this view I suggest whether it might not be both competent and expedient for Congress to provide that a limited amount of some future issue of public securities might be held by any bona fide purchaser exempt from taxation and from seizure for debt, under such restrictions and limitations as might be necessary to guard against abuse of so important a privilege. This would enable every prudent person to set aside a small annuity against a possible day of want.
On July 1st last year, the public debt, according to the Treasury records, was $1,740,690,489.49. If the war goes on for another year, that amount could increase by about $500,000,000. Since most of it is held by our own citizens, it has become a significant part of national, albeit private, wealth. For clear reasons, it's better if this wealth is spread among the entire population. To encourage such distribution, we could offer more incentives for people with limited means to become owners. With this in mind, I propose that Congress consider allowing a limited amount of future public securities to be held by any genuine buyer without being taxed or seized for debt, with necessary restrictions to prevent abuse of this important privilege. This would allow every careful person to set aside a small annuity for potential future needs.
Privileges like these would render the possession of such securities to the amount limited most desirable to every person of small means who might be able to save enough for the purpose. The great advantage of citizens being creditors as well as debtors with relation to the public debt is obvious. Men readily perceive that they can not be much oppressed by a debt which they owe to themselves.
Privileges like these would make owning such securities up to the limited amount very appealing for anyone with modest means who could save enough for it. The clear benefit of citizens being both creditors and debtors concerning the public debt is evident. People easily recognize that they can’t be greatly burdened by a debt they owe to themselves.
The public debt on the first day of July last, although somewhat exceeding the estimate of the Secretary of the Treasury made to Congress at the commencement of the last session, falls short of the estimate of that officer made in the preceding December as to its probable amount at the beginning of this year by the sum of $3,995,097.31. This fact exhibits a satisfactory condition and conduct of the operations of the Treasury.
The public debt on July 1st last year, while slightly higher than what the Secretary of the Treasury estimated for Congress at the start of the last session, is still $3,995,097.31 less than his previous estimate from December regarding its expected amount at the start of this year. This shows a positive state and management of the Treasury's operations.
The national banking system is proving to be acceptable to capitalists and to the people. On the twenty-fifth day of November five hundred and eighty-four national banks had been organized, a considerable number of which were conversions from State banks. Changes from State systems to the national system are rapidly taking place, and it is hoped that very soon there will be in the United States no banks of issue not authorized by Congress and no bank-note circulation not secured by the Government. That the Government and the people will derive great benefit from this change in the banking systems of the country can hardly be questioned. The national system will create a reliable and permanent influence in support of the national credit and protect the people against losses in the use of paper money. Whether or not any further legislation is advisable for the suppression of State-bank issues, it will be for Congress to determine. It seems quite clear that the Treasury can not be satisfactorily conducted unless the Government can exercise a restraining power over the bank-note circulation of the country.
The national banking system is proving to be acceptable to capitalists and the public. As of November twenty-fifth, five hundred and eighty-four national banks had been established, with a significant number converting from state banks. Transitions from state systems to the national system are happening quickly, and it is hoped that very soon there will be no banks issuing currency in the United States that aren't authorized by Congress, and no bank-note circulation that isn't backed by the Government. It’s hardly in question that both the Government and the people will benefit greatly from this shift in the country’s banking systems. The national system will provide a reliable and lasting support for national credit and protect people from losses associated with using paper money. Whether further legislation is needed to eliminate state bank issues will be up to Congress to decide. It seems clear that the Treasury cannot be managed satisfactorily unless the Government can exert control over the country’s bank-note circulation.
The report of the Secretary of War and the accompanying documents will detail the campaigns of the armies in the field since the date of the last annual message, and also the operations of the several administrative bureaus of the War Department during the last year. It will also specify the measures deemed essential for the national defense and to keep up and supply the requisite military force.
The report from the Secretary of War and the related documents will outline the campaigns of the armies in the field since the last annual message, as well as the activities of the various administrative bureaus of the War Department over the past year. It will also detail the necessary measures considered vital for national defense and to maintain and supply the required military force.
The report of the Secretary of the Navy presents a comprehensive and satisfactory exhibit of the affairs of that Department and of the naval service. It is a subject of congratulation and laudable pride to our countrymen that a Navy of such vast proportions has been organized in so brief a period and conducted with so much efficiency and success.
The Secretary of the Navy's report provides a thorough and satisfactory overview of the activities of that Department and the naval service. It's something for our countrymen to celebrate and take pride in that a Navy of such large scale has been established in such a short time and operated with great efficiency and success.
The general exhibit of the Navy, including vessels under construction on the first of December, 1864, shows a total of 671 vessels, carrying 4610 guns, and of 510,396 tons, being an actual increase during the year, over and above all losses by shipwreck or in battle, of 83 vessels, 167 guns, and 42,427 tons.
The overall display of the Navy, including ships being built as of December 1, 1864, shows a total of 671 vessels, armed with 4,610 guns, and weighing 510,396 tons. This reflects a real increase over the year, despite all losses from shipwreck or battle, of 83 vessels, 167 guns, and 42,427 tons.
The total number of men at this time in the naval service, including officers, is about 51,000.
The total number of men in the naval service right now, including officers, is around 51,000.
There have been captured by the Navy during the year 324 vessels, and the whole number of naval captures since hostilities commenced is 1379, of which 267 are steamers.
The Navy captured 324 vessels over the year, making the total number of naval captures since the start of hostilities 1,379, including 267 steamers.
The gross proceeds arising from the sale of condemned prize property thus far reported amount to $14,369,250.51. A large amount of such proceeds is still under adjudication and yet to be reported.
The total money made from the sale of seized prize property so far is $14,369,250.51. A significant portion of this money is still being legally reviewed and hasn’t been reported yet.
The total expenditure of the Navy Department of every description, including the cost of the immense squadrons that have been called into existence from the fourth of March, 1861, to the first of November, 1864, is $238,647,262.35.
The total spending by the Navy Department for everything, including the cost of the massive fleets that have been established from March 4, 1861, to November 1, 1864, is $238,647,262.35.
Your favorable consideration is invited to the various recommendations of the Secretary of the Navy, especially in regard to a navy-yard and suitable establishment for the construction and repair of iron vessels and the machinery and armature for our ships, to which reference was made in my last annual message.
Your positive attention is requested for the various recommendations from the Secretary of the Navy, especially concerning a navy yard and a proper facility for building and repairing iron vessels, along with the machinery and equipment for our ships, which I mentioned in my last annual message.
Your attention is also invited to the views expressed in the report in relation to the legislation of Congress at its last session in respect to prize on our inland waters.
Your attention is also drawn to the opinions stated in the report concerning the legislation from Congress during its last session regarding prizes on our inland waters.
I cordially concur in the recommendation of the Secretary as to the propriety of creating the new rank of vice-admiral in our naval service.
I fully agree with the Secretary's suggestion to create the new rank of vice-admiral in our navy.
Your attention is invited to the report of the Postmaster-General for a detailed account of the operations and financial condition of the Post-Office Department.
Your attention is drawn to the report of the Postmaster-General for a detailed overview of the operations and financial status of the Post-Office Department.
The postal revenues for the year ending June 30, 1864, amounted to $12,438,253.78, and the expenditures to $12,644,786.20, the excess of expenditures over receipts being $206,532.42.
The postal revenues for the year ending June 30, 1864, were $12,438,253.78, and the expenditures were $12,644,786.20, resulting in an excess of expenditures over receipts of $206,532.42.
The views presented by the Postmaster-General on the subject of special grants by the Government in aid of the establishment of new lines of ocean mail steamships and the policy he recommends for the development of increased commercial intercourse with adjacent and neighboring countries should receive the careful consideration of Congress.
The Postmaster-General's views on special government grants to support the establishment of new ocean mail steamship lines and the policy he suggests for boosting trade with nearby countries should be seriously considered by Congress.
It is of noteworthy interest that the steady expansion of population, improvement, and governmental institutions over the new and unoccupied portions of our country have scarcely been checked, much less impeded or destroyed, by our great civil war, which at first glance would seem to have absorbed almost the entire energies of the nation.
It’s interesting to note that the steady growth of the population, improvements, and government institutions in the new and unoccupied areas of our country have hardly been slowed down, let alone stopped or destroyed, by our major civil war, which at first seems to have taken up almost all the nation’s energy.
The organization and admission of the State of Nevada has been completed in conformity with law, and thus our excellent system is firmly established in the mountains, which once seemed a barren and uninhabitable waste between the Atlantic States and those which have grown up on the coast of the Pacific Ocean.
The organization and admission of the State of Nevada has been finalized according to the law, and now our great system is securely in place in the mountains, which once appeared to be a desolate and unlivable wasteland between the Atlantic States and those that have developed along the Pacific Coast.
The Territories of the Union are generally in a condition of prosperity and rapid growth. Idaho and Montana, by reason of their great distance and the interruption of communication with them by Indian hostilities, have been only partially organized; but it is understood that these difficulties are about to disappear, which will permit their governments, like those of the others, to go into speedy and full operation.
The Union territories are mostly doing well and growing quickly. Idaho and Montana, due to their remoteness and disruptions in communication caused by Indian conflicts, have only been partially organized. However, it's expected that these issues will soon be resolved, allowing their governments to function fully and efficiently, like the others.
As intimately connected with and promotive of this material growth of the nation, I ask the attention of Congress to the valuable information and important recommendations relating to the public lands, Indian affairs, the Pacific Railroad, and mineral discoveries contained in the report of the Secretary of the Interior which is herewith transmitted, and which report also embraces the subjects of patents, pensions, and other topics of public interest pertaining to his Department.
As closely tied to and supportive of the nation's material growth, I urge Congress to consider the valuable information and important recommendations regarding public lands, Indian affairs, the Pacific Railroad, and mineral discoveries found in the report from the Secretary of the Interior, which I am sending along. This report also covers topics like patents, pensions, and other matters of public interest related to his Department.
The quantity of public land disposed of during the five quarters ending on the thirtieth of September last was 4,221,342 acres, of which 1,538,614 acres were entered under the homestead law. The remainder was located with military land warrants, agricultural scrip certified to States for railroads, and sold for cash. The cash received from sales and location fees was $1,019,446.
The amount of public land sold off during the five quarters ending on September 30th was 4,221,342 acres, of which 1,538,614 acres were claimed under the homestead law. The rest was obtained using military land warrants, agricultural scrip certified to states for railroads, and sold for cash. The total cash received from sales and location fees was $1,019,446.
The income from sales during the fiscal year ending June 30, 1864, was $678,007.21, against $136,077.95 received during the preceding year. The aggregate number of acres surveyed during the year has been equal to the quantity disposed of, and there is open to settlement about 133,000,000 acres of surveyed land.
The income from sales for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1864, was $678,007.21, compared to $136,077.95 received the previous year. The total number of acres surveyed during the year was equal to the amount sold, and there are about 133,000,000 acres of surveyed land available for settlement.
The great enterprise of connecting the Atlantic with the Pacific States by railways and telegraph lines has been entered upon with a vigor that gives assurance of success, notwithstanding the embarrassments arising from the prevailing high prices of materials and labor. The route of the main line of the road has been definitely located for one hundred miles westward from the initial point at Omaha City, Nebraska, and a preliminary location of the Pacific Railroad of California has been made from Sacramento eastward to the great bend of the Truckee River in Nevada.
The ambitious project to connect the Atlantic with the Pacific States through railways and telegraph lines is underway with a determination that suggests it will succeed, despite the challenges posed by the current high costs of materials and labor. The main line's route has been firmly established for one hundred miles west from the starting point in Omaha City, Nebraska, and a preliminary route for the Pacific Railroad of California has been mapped out from Sacramento east to the significant bend of the Truckee River in Nevada.
Numerous discoveries of gold, silver, and cinnabar mines have been added to the many heretofore known, and the country occupied by the Sierra Nevada and Rocky mountains and the subordinate ranges now teems with enterprising labor, which is richly remunerative. It is believed that the produce of the mines of precious metals in that region has during the year reached, if not exceeded, $100,000,000 in value.
Many new gold, silver, and cinnabar mines have been discovered, adding to the ones already known. The areas around the Sierra Nevada and Rocky Mountains, as well as their smaller ranges, are now bustling with active workers, and the rewards are substantial. It's estimated that the value of precious metals produced from those mines this year has reached or even surpassed $100 million.
It was recommended in my last annual message that our Indian system be remodeled. Congress at its last session, acting upon the recommendation, did provide for reorganizing the system in California, and it is believed that under the present organization the management of the Indians there will be attended with reasonable success. Much yet remains to be done to provide for the proper government of the Indians in other parts of the country, to render it secure for the advancing settler, and to provide for the welfare of the Indian. The Secretary reiterates his recommendations, and to them the attention of Congress is invited.
In my last annual message, I suggested that we need to revamp our Indian system. During its last session, Congress acted on this recommendation and made plans to reorganize the system in California. It's believed that with the current structure in place, managing the Native Americans there will be more successful. However, there's still much to be done to ensure proper governance for Native Americans in other areas of the country, to make it safe for incoming settlers, and to support the well-being of the Native American people. The Secretary emphasizes these recommendations again and urges Congress to pay attention to them.
The liberal provisions made by Congress for paying pensions to invalid soldiers and sailors of the Republic and to the widows, orphans, and dependent mothers of those who have fallen in battle or died of disease contracted or of wounds received in the service of their country have been diligently administered. There have been added to the pension rolls during the year ending the 30th day of June last the names of 16,770 invalid soldiers and of 271 disabled seamen, making the present number of army invalid pensioners 22,767 and of navy invalid pensioners 712.
The generous support provided by Congress for paying pensions to disabled soldiers and sailors of the Republic, as well as to the widows, orphans, and dependent mothers of those who have died in battle or from diseases contracted or wounds sustained while serving their country, has been carefully managed. Over the year ending June 30th, an additional 16,770 disabled soldiers and 271 disabled sailors have been added to the pension rolls, bringing the total number of army invalid pensioners to 22,767 and navy invalid pensioners to 712.
Of widows, orphans, and mothers 22,198 have been placed on the army pension rolls and 248 on the navy rolls. The present number of army pensioners of this class is 25,433 and of navy pensioners 793. At the beginning of the year the number of Revolutionary pensioners was 1430. Only twelve of them were soldiers, of whom seven have since died. The remainder are those who under the law receive pensions because of relationship to Revolutionary soldiers. During the year ending the thirtieth of June, 1864, $4,504,616.92 have been paid to pensioners of all classes.
Of widows, orphans, and mothers, 22,198 have been added to the army pension rolls and 248 to the navy rolls. The current number of army pensioners in this group is 25,433, while there are 793 navy pensioners. At the start of the year, the number of Revolutionary pensioners was 1,430. Only twelve of them were soldiers, and seven have since passed away. The rest are receiving pensions due to their relationship with Revolutionary soldiers. During the year ending June 30, 1864, a total of $4,504,616.92 was paid to pensioners of all categories.
I cheerfully commend to your continued patronage the benevolent institutions of the District of Columbia which have hitherto been established or fostered by Congress, and respectfully refer for information concerning them and in relation to the Washington Aqueduct, the Capitol, and other matters of local interest to the report of the Secretary.
I happily recommend that you keep supporting the charitable institutions of the District of Columbia that have been set up or supported by Congress, and I respectfully direct you to the Secretary's report for more information about them, as well as details regarding the Washington Aqueduct, the Capitol, and other local matters.
The Agricultural Department, under the supervision of its present energetic and faithful head, is rapidly commending itself to the great and vital interest it was created to advance. It is peculiarly the people's department, in which they feel more directly concerned than in any other. I commend it to the continued attention and fostering care of Congress.
The Agricultural Department, led by its current dedicated and energetic head, is quickly proving its worth to the important cause it was set up to support. It's truly the people's department, one that they feel more connected to than any other. I encourage Congress to keep paying attention to it and supporting its work.
The war continues. Since the last annual message all the important lines and positions then occupied by our forces have been maintained and our arms have steadily advanced, thus liberating the regions left in rear, so that Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, and parts of other States have again produced reasonably fair crops.
The war goes on. Since the last annual update, all the key lines and positions held by our forces have been kept secure, and we have steadily pushed forward, freeing up the areas left behind. As a result, Missouri, Kentucky, Tennessee, and parts of other states have once again produced fairly good crops.
The most remarkable feature in the military operations of the year is General Sherman's attempted march of three hundred miles directly through the insurgent region. It tends to show a great increase of our relative strength that our General-in-Chief should feel able to confront and hold in check every active force of the enemy, and yet to detach a well-appointed large army to move on such an expedition. The result not yet being known, conjecture in regard to it is not here indulged.
The most notable aspect of the military actions this year is General Sherman's planned march of three hundred miles straight through enemy territory. It demonstrates a significant boost in our overall strength that our General-in-Chief feels confident enough to face and contain every active force of the enemy, while also sending a well-equipped large army on such a mission. Since the outcome is still unknown, we won’t speculate about it here.
Important movements have also occurred during the year to the effect of molding society for durability in the Union. Although short of complete success, it is much in the right direction that twelve thousand citizens in each of the States of Arkansas and Louisiana have organized loyal State governments, with free constitutions, and are earnestly struggling to maintain and administer them. The movements in the same direction more extensive though less definite in Missouri, Kentucky, and Tennessee, should not be overlooked. But Maryland presents the example of complete success. Maryland is secure to liberty and union for all the future. The genius of rebellion will no more claim Maryland. Like another foul spirit being driven out, it may seek to tear her, but it will woo her no more.
Important movements have also taken place this year aimed at strengthening society for lasting unity. While they haven't fully succeeded, it's a positive step that twelve thousand citizens in each of the states of Arkansas and Louisiana have set up loyal state governments with free constitutions and are actively working to uphold and manage them. The efforts in Missouri, Kentucky, and Tennessee are broader, though less clear, and should not be ignored. However, Maryland stands as a shining example of complete success. Maryland is firmly secured for liberty and unity for the future. The spirit of rebellion will no longer claim Maryland. Like an evil spirit being expelled, it may try to cause trouble, but it will no longer charm her.
At the last session of Congress a proposed amendment of the Constitution abolishing slavery throughout the United States passed the Senate, but failed for lack of the requisite two-thirds vote in the House of Representatives. Although the present is the same Congress and nearly the same members, and without questioning the wisdom or patriotism of those who stood in opposition, I venture to recommend the reconsideration and passage of the measure at the present session. Of course the abstract question is not changed; but an intervening election shows almost certainly that the next Congress will pass the measure if this does not. Hence there is only a question of time as to when the proposed amendment will go to the States for their action. And as it is to so go at all events, may we not agree that the sooner the better? It is not claimed that the election has imposed a duty on members to change their views or their votes any further than, as an additional element to be considered, their judgment may be affected by it. It is the voice of the people now for the first time heard upon the question. In a great national crisis like ours, unanimity of action among those seeking a common end is very desirable, almost indispensable. And yet no approach to such unanimity is attainable unless some deference shall be paid to the will of the majority simply because it is the will of the majority. In this case the common end is the maintenance of the Union, and among the means to secure that end such will, through the election, is most clearly declared in favor of such Constitutional amendment.
At the last session of Congress, a proposed amendment to the Constitution that would end slavery across the United States passed the Senate but didn’t get the necessary two-thirds vote in the House of Representatives. Although it’s the same Congress and almost the same members, and without questioning the wisdom or patriotism of those who opposed it, I suggest we reconsider and pass this measure in the current session. The fundamental question hasn’t changed; however, a recent election indicates that the next Congress will likely pass it if this one does not. Therefore, it’s just a matter of timing for when the proposed amendment will go to the states for their decision. Since it will go there regardless, can we agree that sooner is better? It’s not suggested that the election has forced members to change their views or votes, but it may affect their judgment as an added factor to consider. This is the first time we’ve heard the voice of the people on this issue. In a significant national crisis like ours, it’s very important—almost essential—to have unity among those working toward a common goal. Yet, we won’t achieve any semblance of that unity unless we acknowledge the will of the majority simply because it represents the majority. In this case, the common goal is to maintain the Union, and the election clearly shows that the majority is in favor of this Constitutional amendment as a means to secure that goal.
The most reliable indication of public purpose in this country is derived through our popular elections. Judging by the recent canvass and its result, the purpose of the people within the loyal States to maintain the integrity of the Union was never more firm nor more nearly unanimous than now. The extraordinary calmness and good order with which the millions of voters met and mingled at the polls give strong assurance of this. Not only all those who supported the Union ticket, so called, but a great majority of the opposing party also may be fairly claimed to entertain and to be actuated by the same purpose. It is an unanswerable argument to this effect that no candidate for any office whatever, high or low, has ventured to seek votes on the avowal that he was for giving up the Union. There have been much impugning of motives and much heated controversy as to the proper means and best mode of advancing the Union cause, but on the distinct issue of Union or no Union the politicians have shown their instinctive knowledge that there is no diversity among the people. In affording the people the fair opportunity of showing one to another and to the world this firmness and unanimity of purpose, the election has been of vast value to the national cause.
The most reliable sign of public purpose in this country comes from our popular elections. Based on the recent voting and its outcome, the determination of the people in the loyal States to uphold the integrity of the Union has never been stronger or more nearly unanimous than it is now. The extraordinary calmness and order with which millions of voters participated at the polls provide strong assurance of this. Not only do all those who supported the Union ticket, as it’s called, but also a vast majority of the opposing party can fairly be seen as sharing the same goal. A compelling argument supporting this is that no candidate for any office, whether high or low, has dared to seek votes based on the claim that they wanted to abandon the Union. There has been a lot of questioning of motives and intense debate about the best methods to promote the Union cause, but on the clear issue of Union or no Union, politicians have instinctively recognized that there is no disagreement among the people. By giving the public a fair chance to demonstrate their strong and united purpose to each other and to the world, the election has been incredibly valuable to the national cause.
The election has exhibited another fact not less valuable to be known—the fact that we do not approach exhaustion in the most important branch of national resources, that of living men. While it is melancholy to reflect that the war has filled so many graves and carried mourning to so many hearts, it is some relief to know that, compared with the surviving, the fallen have been so few. While corps and divisions and brigades and regiments have formed and fought and dwindled and gone out of existence, a great majority of the men who composed them are still living. The same is true of the naval service. The election returns prove this. So many voters could not else be found. The States regularly holding elections, both now and four years ago, to wit, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin, cast 3,982,011 votes now, against 3,870,222 cast then, showing an aggregate now of 3,982,011. To this is to be added 33,762 cast now in the new States of Kansas and Nevada, which States did not vote in 1860, thus swelling the aggregate to 4,015,773 and the net increase during the three years and a half of war to 145,551. A table is appended showing particulars. To this again should be added the number of all soldiers in the field from Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Delaware, Indiana, Illinois, and California, who by the laws of those States could not vote away from their homes, and which number can not be less than 90,000. Nor yet is this all. The number in organized Territories is triple now what it was four years ago—while thousands, white and black, join us as the national arms press back the insurgent lines. So much is shown, affirmatively and negatively, by the election. It is not material to inquire how the increase has been produced or to show that it would have been greater but for the war, which is probably true. The important fact remains demonstrated that we have more men now than we had when the war began; that we are not exhausted nor in process of exhaustion; that we are gaining strength and may if need be maintain the contest indefinitely. [This sentence recognizes the concern of a guerilla war after the main war finished.]This as to men. Material resources are now more complete and abundant than ever.
The election has revealed another important fact: we are not running out of our most critical national resource—our people. While it's sad to think about how many lives the war has taken and how much grief it's caused, it's comforting to know that, in comparison to those who survived, the number of fallen is relatively small. Even as units have formed, fought, diminished, and disappeared, a large majority of the men who made them up are still alive. The same applies to the Navy. The election results confirm this. So many voters wouldn't exist otherwise. The states that regularly hold elections now and four years ago, including California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wisconsin, cast 3,982,011 votes now, compared to 3,870,222 then, showing a total of 3,982,011. This total includes 33,762 votes from the new states of Kansas and Nevada, which didn’t vote in 1860, bringing the total to 4,015,773, with an increase of 145,551 during the three and a half years of war. A table is attached showing details. Also, we need to consider the number of soldiers from Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New Jersey, Delaware, Indiana, Illinois, and California, who couldn’t vote because of state laws, which must be at least 90,000. And that’s not all. The number of people in organized territories is now three times what it was four years ago, as thousands, both white and black, join us as the national forces push back the insurgent lines. This is clearly evident, both positively and negatively, from the election. It doesn't matter how this increase happened or to prove that it would have been higher without the war, which is likely true. The key takeaway is that we have more people now than we did at the start of the war; we are not exhausted or in the process of becoming so; we are gaining strength and, if necessary, can continue the fight indefinitely. [This sentence recognizes the concern of a guerilla war after the main war finished.] As for materials, resources are now more complete and abundant than ever.
The national resources, then, are unexhausted, and, as we believe, inexhaustible. The public purpose to re-establish and maintain the national authority is unchanged, and, as we believe, unchangeable. The manner of continuing the effort remains to choose. On careful consideration of all the evidence accessible it seems to me that no attempt at negotiation with the insurgent leader could result in any good. He would accept nothing short of severance of the Union, precisely what we will not and can not give. His declarations to this effect are explicit and oft repeated. He does not attempt to deceive us. He affords us no excuse to deceive ourselves. He can not voluntarily reaccept the Union; we can not voluntarily yield it. Between him and us the issue is distinct, simple, and inflexible. It is an issue which can only be tried by war and decided by victory. If we yield, we are beaten; if the Southern people fail him, he is beaten. Either way it would be the victory and defeat following war. What is true, however, of him who heads the insurgent cause is not necessarily true of those who follow. Although he can not reaccept the Union, they can. Some of them, we know, already desire peace and reunion. The number of such may increase. They can at any moment have peace simply by laying down their arms and submitting to the national authority under the Constitution. After so much the Government could not, if it would, maintain war against them. The loyal people would not sustain or allow it. If questions should remain, we would adjust them by the peaceful means of legislation, conference, courts, and votes, operating only in Constitutional and lawful channels. Some certain, and other possible, questions are and would be beyond the Executive power to adjust; as, for instance, the admission of members into Congress and whatever might require the appropriation of money. The Executive power itself would be greatly diminished by the cessation of actual war. Pardons and remissions of forfeitures, however, would still be within Executive control. In what spirit and temper this control would be exercised can be fairly judged of by the past.
The national resources are still intact, and we believe they are endless. The public goal to restore and uphold national authority remains unchanged and, in our view, unchangeable. We still need to decide how to continue this effort. After carefully considering all the available evidence, I think that trying to negotiate with the insurgent leader won't lead to anything good. He wouldn't accept anything less than breaking away from the Union, which is exactly what we will not and cannot give. His statements about this are clear and repeated often. He doesn’t try to fool us, and he gives us no reason to fool ourselves. He cannot choose to rejoin the Union voluntarily; we cannot choose to give it up. The issue between him and us is clear, straightforward, and unyielding. It’s a matter that can only be tested through war and decided by victory. If we back down, we lose; if the Southern people abandon him, he loses. Either way, it would be victory and defeat resulting from war. However, what’s true for him as the leader of the insurgency isn’t necessarily true for those who follow him. Even though he can’t rejoin the Union, they can. Some of them already want peace and reunion. That number could grow. They can achieve peace at any time by laying down their arms and submitting to national authority under the Constitution. After all that has happened, the government could not, even if it wanted to, continue a war against them. The loyal citizens wouldn’t support it or allow it. If any questions remain, we would resolve them through peaceful means like legislation, conferences, courts, and votes, only operating within constitutional and legal channels. Certain definite, and other potential, issues would be beyond the Executive's power to resolve; for example, admitting members into Congress and anything that would require funding. The Executive's powers would also be significantly reduced by stopping actual warfare. However, pardons and remissions of forfeitures would still fall under Executive control. The manner and attitude in which this control would be exercised can be reasonably judged based on past actions.
A year ago general pardon and amnesty, upon specified terms, were offered to all except certain designated classes, and it was at the same time made known that the excepted classes were still within contemplation of special clemency. During the year many availed themselves of the general provision, and many more would, only that the signs of bad faith in some led to such precautionary measures as rendered the practical process less easy and certain. During the same time also special pardons have been granted to individuals of the excepted classes, and no voluntary application has been denied. Thus practically the door has been for a full year open to all except such as were not in condition to make free choice; that is, such as were in custody or under constraint. It is still so open to all. But the time may come, probably will come, when public duty shall demand that it be closed and that in lieu more rigorous measures than heretofore shall be adopted.
A year ago, a general pardon and amnesty were offered under specific conditions to everyone except certain designated groups. At the same time, it was made clear that those excluded groups were still considered for special mercy. Throughout the year, many people took advantage of this general offer, and many more would have if not for the signs of bad faith displayed by some, which led to precautionary measures that made the process less straightforward and certain. During the same period, special pardons were granted to individuals in the excluded groups, and no voluntary applications were denied. So, practically, the door has been open for a full year to everyone except those unable to make a free choice, meaning those who were in custody or under restraint. It remains open to all. However, the time may come, and probably will come, when public duty will require that it be closed and that more stringent measures than before be implemented.
In presenting the abandonment of armed resistance to the national authority on the part of the insurgents as the only indispensable condition to ending the war on the part of the Government, I retract nothing heretofore said as to slavery. I repeat the declaration made a year ago, that "while I remain in my present position I shall not attempt to retract or modify the emancipation proclamation, nor shall I return to slavery any person who is free by the terms of that proclamation or by any of the acts of Congress." If the people should, by whatever mode or means, make it an Executive duty to re-enslave such persons, another, and not I, must be their instrument to perform it.
In stating that ending armed resistance to the national authority is the only essential condition for the Government to end the war, I stand by everything I've said about slavery. I reiterate my statement from a year ago that "as long as I'm in my current position, I will not try to retract or change the emancipation proclamation, and I will not return to slavery any person who is free due to that proclamation or any acts of Congress." If the people, in any way, make it a duty for the Executive to re-enslave those individuals, another person, not me, will have to carry it out.
In stating a single condition of peace I mean simply to say that the war will cease on the part of the Government whenever it shall have ceased on the part of those who began it.
In saying one condition for peace, I mean that the war from the Government will end as soon as it ends for those who started it.
RESPONSE TO A SERENADE, DECEMBER 6, 1864.
FRIENDS AND FELLOW-CITIZENS:—I believe I shall never be old enough to speak without embarrassment when I have nothing to talk about. I have no good news to tell you, and yet I have no bad news to tell. We have talked of elections until there is nothing more to say about them. The most interesting news now we have is from Sherman. We all know where he went in at, but I can't tell where he will come out at. I will now close by proposing three cheers for General Sherman and his army.
FRIENDS AND FELLOW-CITIZENS:—I don’t think I’ll ever be old enough to speak without feeling awkward when I have nothing to say. I don’t have any good news to share, but I also don’t have any bad news. We’ve talked about elections so much that there’s nothing left to say. The most intriguing news we have now is about Sherman. We all know where he entered, but I can’t say where he’ll come out. I’ll wrap up by asking for three cheers for General Sherman and his army.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR HALL.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 7, 1864.
GOVERNOR HALL, Jefferson City, Mo.:
GOVERNOR HALL, Jefferson City, MO:
Complaint is made to me of the doings of a man at Hannibal, Mo., by the name of Haywood, who, as I am told, has charge of some militia force, and is not in the United States service. Please inquire into the matter and correct anything you may find amiss if in your power.
I’ve received complaints about a guy named Haywood in Hannibal, Mo., who, from what I've been told, is in charge of a militia group but is not in the U.S. military. Please look into this issue and fix anything that you find is wrong, if you can.
TELEGRAM TO COLONEL FASLEIGH.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., December 8, 1864.
COLONEL FASLEIGH, Louisville, Ky.:
COLONEL FASLEIGH, Louisville, KY:
I am appealed to in behalf of a man by the name of Frank Fairbairns, said to have been for a long time and still in prison, without any definite ground stated. How is it?
I am reaching out on behalf of a man named Frank Fairbairns, who has been in prison for a long time and still is, without any clear reason given. What's going on?
ORDER APPOINTING COMMISSIONERS
TO INVESTIGATE THE MILITARY DIVISION WEST OF THE MISSISSIPPI.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, December 10, 1864.
WHITE HOUSE, December 10, 1864.
ORDERED, First, that Major-General William P. Smith and the Hon. Henry Stanbery be, and they are hereby, appointed special commissioners to investigate and report, for the information of the President; upon the civil and military administration in the military division bordering upon and west of the Mississippi, under such instructions as shall be issued by authority of the President and the War Department.
ORDERED, First, that Major-General William P. Smith and the Hon. Henry Stanbery are appointed as special commissioners to investigate and report, for the President's information, on the civil and military administration in the military division along and west of the Mississippi, following the instructions that will be issued by the President and the War Department.
Second, said commissioners shall have power to examine witnesses upon oath, and to take such proofs orally or in writing, upon the subject-matters of investigation as they may deem expedient, and return the same together with their report.
Second, the commissioners will have the authority to examine witnesses under oath and to gather evidence either verbally or in writing on the topics being investigated as they see fit, and will submit this along with their report.
Third, all officers and persons in the military, naval and revenue services, or in any branch of the public service under the authority of the United States Government, are required, upon subpoena issued by direction of the said commissioners, to appear before them at such time and place as may be designated in said subpoena and to give testimony on oath touching such matters as may be inquired of by the commissioners, and to produce such books, papers, writings, and documents as they may be notified or required to produce by the commissioners, and as may be in their possession.
Third, all officers and personnel in the military, naval, and revenue services, or in any branch of public service under the authority of the United States Government, are required, upon subpoena issued by the commissioners, to appear before them at the time and place specified in the subpoena. They must give testimony under oath about matters the commissioners inquire into and produce any books, papers, writings, and documents they have been notified or required to present by the commissioners.
Fourth, said special commissioners shall also investigate and report upon any other matters that may hereafter be directed by the Secretary of War, and shall with all convenient dispatch make report to him in writing of their investigation, and shall also from time to time make special reports to the Secretary of War upon such matters as they may deem of importance to the public interests.
Fourth, the special commissioners will also look into and report on any other issues that the Secretary of War may direct in the future, and they will promptly provide him with a written report of their findings. They will also periodically submit special reports to the Secretary of War on issues they consider important to public interests.
Fifth, the Secretary of War shall assign to the said commissioners such aid and assistance as may be required for the performance of their duties, and make such just and reasonable allowances and compensation for the said commissioners and for the persons employed by them as he may deem proper.
Fifth, the Secretary of War will provide the commissioners with any support and assistance they need to carry out their responsibilities, and will set fair and reasonable pay and compensation for the commissioners and the people they hire, as he sees fit.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G, H. THOMAS. WASHINGTON, D.C., December 16, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL THOMAS, Nashville, Tennessee:
Please accept for yourself, officers, and men, the nation's thanks for your good work of yesterday. You made a magnificent beginning; a grand consummation is within your easy reach. Do not let it slip.
Please accept the nation’s gratitude, officers and men, for your great work yesterday. You made an impressive start; a remarkable outcome is within your grasp. Don’t let it slip away.
ORIGIN OF THE "GREENBACK" CURRENCY
TO COLONEL B. D. TAYLOR
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December [16?], 1864.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December [16?], 1864.
DEAR COLONEL DICK:—I have long determined to make public the origin of the greenback and tell the world that it is Dick Taylor's creation. You had always been friendly to me, and when troublous times fell on us, and my shoulders, though broad and willing, were weak, and myself surrounded by such circumstances and such people that I knew not whom to trust, then I said in my extremity: "I will send for Colonel Taylor; he will know what to do." I think it was in January, 1862, on or about the 16th, that I did so. You came, and I said to you:
DEAR COLONEL DICK: I have long decided to share the story of the greenback and let everyone know that it was created by Dick Taylor. You've always been supportive of me, and during tough times when my shoulders, although strong and willing, felt weak, and I was surrounded by circumstances and people that made me unsure of whom to trust, I thought to myself: "I'll reach out to Colonel Taylor; he’ll know what to do." I believe it was around January 16th, 1862, when I did just that. You arrived, and I said to you:
"What can we do?" Said you, "Why, issue Treasury notes bearing no interest, printed on the best banking paper. Issue enough to pay off the Army expenses and declare it legal tender."
"What can we do?" you said. "Well, we can issue Treasury notes that don’t earn interest, printed on high-quality bank paper. We should print enough to cover the Army's expenses and declare it legal tender."
Chase thought it a hazardous thing, but we finally accomplished it, and gave the people of this Republic the greatest blessing they ever had—their own paper to pay their own debts.
Chase thought it was a risky move, but we finally pulled it off and gave the people of this Republic the best gift they ever received—their own currency to settle their debts.
It is due to you, the father of the present greenback, that the people should know it, and I take great pleasure in making it known. How many times have I laughed at you telling me plainly that I was too lazy to be anything but a lawyer.
It’s because of you, the father of today’s greenback, that people should be aware of it, and I’m really happy to share that knowledge. How often have I chuckled when you directly told me that I was too lazy to be anything other than a lawyer?
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER IN COMMAND AT CHATTANOOGA. EXECUTIVE MANSION,
WASHINGTON, December 16, 1864
WASHINGTON, December 16, 1864
OFFICER IN COMMAND at Chattanooga, Tenn.:
It is said that Harry Walters, a private in the Anderson cavalry, is now and for a long time has been in prison at Chattanooga. Please report to me what is his condition, and for what he is imprisoned.
It’s been said that Harry Walters, a private in the Anderson cavalry, is currently in prison in Chattanooga and has been for quite some time. Please let me know what his condition is and the reason for his imprisonment.
CALL FOR 300,000 VOLUNTEERS, DECEMBER 19, 1864.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES:
A Proclamation
A Statement
Whereas, by the act approved July 4, 1864, entitled "An act further to regulate and provide for the enrolling and calling out the national forces, and for other purposes," it is provided that the President of the United States may, "at his discretion, at any time hereafter, call for any number of men, as volunteers for the respective terms of one, two, and three years for military service," and "that in case the quota or any part thereof of any town, township, ward of a city, precinct, or election district, or of any country not so subdivided, shall not be filled within the space of fifty days after such call, then the President shall immediately order a draft for one year to fill such quota or any part thereof which may be unfilled;" and
Whereas, by the law approved on July 4, 1864, called "An act further to regulate and provide for the enrolling and calling out the national forces, and for other purposes," it states that the President of the United States may, "at his discretion, at any time in the future, call for any number of men, as volunteers for terms of one, two, or three years for military service," and "that if the quota or any part of it from any town, township, city ward, precinct, or election district, or of any county not divided in this way, is not filled within fifty days after the call, then the President shall immediately order a draft for one year to fill such quota or any part of it that remains unfilled;" and
Whereas, by the credits allowed in accordance with the act of Congress on the call for 500,000 men, made July 18, 1864, the number of men to be obtained under that call was reduced to 280,000; and
Whereas, based on the credits permitted under the act of Congress for the recruitment of 500,000 men, issued on July 18, 1864, the number of men to be recruited under that call was lowered to 280,000; and
Whereas, the operations of the enemy in certain States have rendered it impracticable to procure from them their full quotas of troops under said call; and
Whereas, the enemy's actions in certain states have made it impossible to receive their complete quotas of troops as requested; and
Whereas, from the foregoing causes but 240,000 men have been put into the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps under the said call of July 18, 1864, leaving a deficiency on that call of two hundred and sixty thousand (260,000):
Whereas, due to the reasons mentioned above, only 240,000 men have joined the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps under the call from July 18, 1864, resulting in a shortfall of two hundred and sixty thousand (260,000):
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America, in order to supply the aforesaid deficiency and to provide for casualties in the military and naval service of the United States, do issue this my call for three hundred thousand (300,000) volunteers to serve for one, two, or three years. The quotas of the States, districts, and subdistricts under this call will be assigned by the War Department through the bureau of the Provost-Marshal General of the United States, and "in case the quota or any part thereof of any town, township, ward of a city, precinct, or election district, or of any county not so subdivided, shall not be filled" before the fifteenth of February, 1865, then a draft shall be made to fill such quota or any part thereof under this call which may be unfilled on said fifteenth day of February, 1865.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America, to address the mentioned shortfall and to account for losses in the military and naval service of the United States, am issuing this call for three hundred thousand (300,000) volunteers to serve for one, two, or three years. The quotas for the states, districts, and subdistricts under this call will be assigned by the War Department through the bureau of the Provost-Marshal General of the United States, and "if the quota or any part of it from any town, township, ward of a city, precinct, or election district, or from any county not subdivided, is not filled" by February 15, 1865, then a draft will be held to fill that quota or any part of it that remains unfilled by that date.
In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed..........
In witness whereof, I have set my hand and affixed the seal of the United States here.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
SHERMAN'S MARCH TO THE SEA
TO GENERAL W. T. SHERMAN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 26, 1864
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 26, 1864
MY DEAR GENERAL SHERMAN:—Many, many thanks for your Christmas gift, the capture of Savannah.
MY DEAR GENERAL SHERMAN:—Thank you so much for your Christmas gift, the capture of Savannah.
When you were about leaving Atlanta for the Atlantic coast, I was anxious, if not fearful; but feeling that you were the better judge, and remembering that "nothing risked, nothing gained," I did not interfere. Now, the undertaking being a success, the honor is all yours; for I believe none of us went further than to acquiesce.
When you were about to leave Atlanta for the Atlantic coast, I was worried, if not scared; but knowing you were the better judge, and remembering that "nothing ventured, nothing gained," I didn't get involved. Now that the venture has succeeded, all the credit belongs to you; I believe none of us went beyond just agreeing.
And taking the work of General Thomas into the count, as it should be taken, it is indeed a great success. Not only does it afford the obvious and immediate military advantages; but in showing to the world that your army could be divided, putting the stronger part to an important new service, and yet leaving enough to vanquish the old opposing force of the whole,—Hood's army,—it brings those who sat in darkness to see a great light. But what next?
And considering General Thomas's work, as it should be, it's truly a great success. Not only does it provide clear and immediate military benefits, but it also demonstrates to the world that your army can be split, sending the stronger part on an important new mission while still leaving enough to defeat the entire opposing force—Hood's army. This revelation brings those who were in the dark into the light. But what's next?
I suppose it will be safe if I leave General Grant and yourself to decide.
I guess it’ll be fine if I let General Grant and you decide.
Please make my grateful acknowledgments to your whole army of officers and men.
Please extend my heartfelt thanks to all your officers and troops.
Yours very truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER IN COMMAND AT LEXINGTON.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 27, 1864.
OFFICER IN COMMAND at Lexington, Ky.:
OFFICER IN COMMAND at Lexington, KY:
If within your power send me the particulars of the causes for which Lieutenant-Governor Jacob was arrested and sent away.
If you can, please send me the details about why Lieutenant-Governor Jacob was arrested and sent away.
TO J. MACLEAN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 27, 1864.
Dr. JOHN MACLEAN:
Dr. John Maclean:
MY DEAR SIR:—I have the honor to acknowledge the reception of your note of the twentieth of December, conveying the announcement that the Trustees of the College of New Jersey had conferred upon me the degree of Doctor of Laws.
MY DEAR SIR:—I am honored to acknowledge receiving your note from December 20th, informing me that the Trustees of the College of New Jersey have granted me the degree of Doctor of Laws.
The assurance conveyed by this high compliment, that the course of the Government which I represent, has received the approval of a body of gentlemen of such character and intelligence, in this time of public trial, is most grateful to me.
The reassurance that this high compliment provides—that the direction of the Government I represent has the approval of a group of individuals with such character and intelligence, especially during this challenging time for the public—is incredibly appreciated by me.
Thoughtful men must feel that the fate of civilization upon this continent is involved in the issue of our contest. Among the most gratifying proofs of this conviction is the hearty devotion everywhere exhibited by our schools and colleges to the national cause.
Thoughtful people must realize that the future of civilization on this continent is linked to the outcome of our struggle. One of the most encouraging signs of this belief is the strong commitment shown by our schools and colleges to the national cause.
I am most thankful if my labors have seemed to conduct to the preservation of those institutions, under which alone we can expect good government and in its train sound learning, and the progress of the liberal arts.
I am very grateful if my efforts have helped to maintain the institutions that are essential for good government, along with quality education and the advancement of the liberal arts.
I am, sir, very truly, your obedient servant,
I am, sir, sincerely your devoted servant,
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER IN COMMAND AT NASHVILLE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 28, 1864.
OFFICER IN COMMAND at Nashville, Tenn.:
OFFICER IN CHARGE at Nashville, Tenn.:
Suspend execution of James R. Mallory, for six weeks from Friday the thirtieth of this month, which time I have given his friends to make proof, if they can, upon certain points.
Suspend the execution of James R. Mallory for six weeks from Friday, the 30th of this month. This time is given to his friends to provide evidence, if they can, on certain matters.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
WASHINGTON, D. C., December 28, 1864. 5.30 p.m.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, VA:
If there be no objection, please tell me what you now understand of the Wilmington expedition, present and prospective.
If there’s no objection, please let me know what you currently understand about the Wilmington expedition, both now and in the future.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL BUTLER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 29, 1864.
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER:
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER:
There is a man in Company I, Eleventh Connecticut Volunteers, First Brigade, Third Division, Twenty-fourth Army Corps, at Chapin's Farm, Va.; under the assumed name of William Stanley, but whose real name is Frank R. Judd, and who is under arrest, and probably about to be tried for desertion. He is the son of our present minister to Prussia, who is a close personal friend of Senator Trumbull and myself. We are not willing for the boy to be shot, but we think it as well that his trial go regularly on, suspending execution until further order from me and reporting to me.
There's a guy in Company I, Eleventh Connecticut Volunteers, First Brigade, Third Division, Twenty-fourth Army Corps, at Chapin's Farm, VA; going by the name William Stanley, but his real name is Frank R. Judd. He's under arrest and likely facing trial for desertion. He is the son of our current ambassador to Prussia, who is a close personal friend of Senator Trumbull and me. We don't want the kid to be shot, but we think it's better for his trial to proceed normally, putting a hold on execution until I say otherwise and making sure to keep me updated.
TELEGRAM TO COLONEL WARNER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, December 30, 1864.
COLONEL WARNER, Indianapolis, Ind.:
COL. WARNER, Indianapolis, IN:
It is said that you were on the court-martial that tried John Lennon, and that you are disposed to advise his being pardoned and sent to his regiment. If this be true, telegraph me to that effect at once.
It’s said that you were on the court-martial that tried John Lennon, and that you’re inclined to recommend he be pardoned and sent back to his regiment. If this is true, please send me a telegram right away.
1865
TELEGRAM TO J. WILLIAMS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 4, 1865.
JOHN WILLIAMS, Springfield, Ill.:
JOHN WILLIAMS, Springfield, IL:
Let Trumbo's substitute be regularly mustered in, send me the evidence that it is done and I will then discharge Trumbo.
Let Trumbo's replacement be officially enlisted, send me proof that it's done, and I will then release Trumbo.
MESSAGE TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
WASHINGTON, January 5, 1865.
TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES:
TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES:
I herewith return to your honorable body, in which it originated, a "joint resolution to correct certain clerical errors in the internal revenue act," without my approval.
I’m returning to your esteemed body, where it originated, a "joint resolution to correct certain clerical errors in the internal revenue act," without my approval.
My reason for so doing is that I am informed that this joint resolution was prepared during the last moments of the last session of Congress for the purpose of correcting certain errors of reference in the internal revenue act, which were discovered on an examination of an official copy procured from the State Department a few hours only before the adjournment. It passed the House and went to the Senate, where a vote was taken upon it, but by some accident it was not presented to the President of the Senate for his signature.
My reason for doing this is that I’ve been told this joint resolution was prepared at the last minute during the final session of Congress to fix certain reference errors in the internal revenue act, which were found when an official copy was obtained from the State Department just hours before the adjournment. It passed the House and went to the Senate, where a vote was taken, but due to some oversight, it wasn’t presented to the President of the Senate for his signature.
Since the adjournment of the last session of Congress, other errors of a kind similar to those which this resolution was designed to correct, have been discovered in the law, and it is now thought most expedient to include all the necessary corrections in one act or resolution.
Since the end of the last session of Congress, additional mistakes similar to those this resolution aimed to fix have been found in the law, and it’s now considered most practical to include all the necessary corrections in one act or resolution.
The attention of the proper committee of the House has, I am informed, been already directed to the preparation of a bill for this purpose.
I’ve been told that the right committee in the House is already looking into drafting a bill for this purpose.
TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 5, 1865.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
LT. GEN. GRANT, City Point, VA:
Richard T. Jacob, Lieutenant-Governor of Kentucky, is at the Spotswood House, in Richmond, under an order of General Burbridge not to return to Kentucky. Please communicate leave to him to pass our lines, and come to me here at Washington.
Richard T. Jacob, the Lieutenant-Governor of Kentucky, is at the Spotswood House in Richmond, following an order from General Burbridge not to go back to Kentucky. Please let him know he has permission to pass our lines and come to see me here in Washington.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL GRANT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION,
WASHINGTON, January 6, 1865, LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point:
WASHINGTON, January 6, 1865, LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point:
If there is a man at City Point by the name of Waterman Thornton who is in trouble about desertion, please have his case briefly stated to me and do not let him be executed meantime.
If there’s a guy at City Point named Waterman Thornton who is in trouble for desertion, please summarize his case for me and don’t let him be executed in the meantime.
MESSAGE TO CONGRESS,
WASHINGTON, January 9, 1865.
TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: I transmit to Congress a copy of two treaties between the United States and Belgium, for the extinguishment of the Scheldt dues, etc., concluded on the twentieth of May, 1863, and twentieth of July, 1863, respectively, the ratifications of which were exchanged at Brussels on the twenty-fourth of June last; and I recommend an appropriation to carry into effect the provisions thereof relative to the payment of the proportion of the United States toward the capitalization of the said dues.
TO THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES: I am sending Congress a copy of two treaties between the United States and Belgium that deal with the elimination of the Scheldt dues, finalized on May 20, 1863, and July 20, 1863, respectively. The ratifications were exchanged in Brussels on June 24 of last year. I also recommend funding to implement the provisions concerning the United States' share of the capitalization of these dues.
TO SCHUYLER COLFAX.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 9, 1865.
HON. SCHUYLER COLFAX, Speaker of the House of Representatives.
HON. SCHUYLER COLFAX, Speaker of the House of Representatives.
SIR:—I transmit herewith the letter of the Secretary of War, with accompanying report of the Adjutant-General, in reply to the resolution of the House of Representatives, dated December 7, 1864, requesting me "to communicate to the House the report made by Col. Thomas M. Key of an interview between himself and General Howell Cobb on the fourteenth [15th] day of June, 1862, on the banks of the Chickahominy, on the subject of the exchange of prisoners of war."
SIR:—I am sending you the letter from the Secretary of War, along with the report from the Adjutant-General, in response to the resolution from the House of Representatives, dated December 7, 1864, asking me "to share with the House the report made by Col. Thomas M. Key regarding his meeting with General Howell Cobb on June 14, 1862, on the banks of the Chickahominy, concerning the exchange of prisoners of war."
I am, sir, very respectfully, your obedient servant,
I am, sir, very respectfully, your obedient servant,
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING COMMERCE, JANUARY 10, 1865.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas the act of Congress of the twenty-eighth of September, 1850, entitled "An act to create additional collection districts in the State of California, and to change the existing districts therein, and to modify the existing collection districts in the United States," extends to merchandise warehoused under bond the privilege of being exported to the British North American provinces adjoining the United States, in the manner prescribed in the act of Congress of the third of March, 1845, which designates certain frontier ports through which merchandise may be exported, and further provides "that such other ports situated on the frontiers of the United States, adjoining the British North American provinces, as may hereafter be found expedient, may have extended to them the like privileges on the recommendation of the Secretary of the Treasury, and proclamation duly made by the President of the United States, specially designating the ports to which the aforesaid privileges are to be extended;"
Whereas the Congress act from September 28, 1850, titled "An act to create additional collection districts in the State of California, and to change the existing districts therein, and to modify the existing collection districts in the United States," grants the privilege of exporting merchandise stored under bond to the nearby British North American provinces, following the guidelines set in the Congress act from March 3, 1845, which specifies certain border ports through which merchandise can be exported. It also states that "other ports located on the U.S. borders adjacent to the British North American provinces, which may later be deemed reasonable, can be granted similar privileges based on the Secretary of the Treasury's recommendation and a proclamation made by the President of the United States, specifically designating the ports that will receive these privileges;"
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America, in accordance with the recommendation of the Secretary of the Treasury, do hereby declare and proclaim that the port of St. Albans, in the State of Vermont, is, and shall be, entitled to all the privileges in regard to the exportation of merchandise in bond to the British North American provinces adjoining the United States, which are extended to the ports enumerated in the seventh section of the act of Congress of the third of March, 1845, aforesaid, from and after the date of this proclamation.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America, following the recommendation of the Secretary of the Treasury, hereby declare and proclaim that the port of St. Albans, in the State of Vermont, is and will be entitled to all the privileges related to the export of bonded merchandise to the British North American provinces neighboring the United States, which are granted to the ports listed in the seventh section of the act of Congress from March 3, 1845, starting from the date of this proclamation.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.
Done at the city of Washington, this tenth day of January, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred-and sixty-five, and of the independence of the United States of America the eighty-ninth.
Done in Washington, D.C., on this tenth day of January in the year 1865, and the eighty-ninth year of American independence.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL B. F. BUTLER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 10, 1865.
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, Va.:
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, VA:
No principal report of yours on the Wilmington expedition has ever reached the War Department, as I am informed there. A preliminary report did reach here, but was returned to General Grant at his request. Of course, leave to publish cannot be given without inspection of the paper, and not then if it should be deemed to be detrimental to the public service.
No main report from you on the Wilmington expedition has ever been received by the War Department, as I've been informed. A preliminary report did arrive here, but it was sent back to General Grant at his request. Naturally, permission to publish can’t be granted without reviewing the document, and not even then if it’s considered harmful to the public service.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL B. F. BUTLER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 13, 1865.
MAJOR-GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, Va.:
MAJOR GENERAL BUTLER, Fort Monroe, VA:
Yours asking leave to come to Washington is received. You have been summoned by the Committee on the Conduct of the War to attend here, which, of course, you will do.
Your request to come to Washington has been received. The Committee on the Conduct of the War has called you to attend here, which you will, of course, do.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR JOHNSON.
WASHINGTON, D. C., January 15, 1865.
GOVERNOR JOHNSON, Nashville, Tennessee:
GOVERNOR JOHNSON, Nashville, TN:
Yours announcing ordinance of emancipation received. Thanks to the convention and to you. When do you expect to be here? Would be glad to have your suggestion as to supplying your place of military governor.
Your announcement of the emancipation ordinance was received. Thanks to you and the convention. When do you think you will be here? I would appreciate your suggestions for filling the position of military governor.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. M. DODGE. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January
15, 1865.
15, 1865.
MAJOR-GENERAL DODGE, St. Louis, Missouri:
MAJOR GENERAL DODGE, St. Louis, MO:
It is represented to me that there is so much irregular violence in northern Missouri as to be driving away the people and almost depopulating it. Please gather information, and consider whether an appeal to the people there to go to their homes and let one another alone recognizing as a full right of protection for each that he lets others alone, and banning only him who refuses to let others alone may not enable you to withdraw the troops, their presence itself [being] a cause of irritation and constant apprehension, and thus restore peace and quiet, and returning prosperity. Please consider this and telegraph or write me.
I’ve been told that there’s a lot of random violence in northern Missouri, which is driving people away and nearly emptying the area. Please gather some information and think about whether an appeal to the locals to return to their homes and leave each other alone might help. It should be recognized as everyone’s right to feel protected when they let others be, and we should only ban those who refuse to do so. This could allow you to withdraw the troops, whose presence is causing irritation and constant worry, and potentially restore peace, calm, and prosperity. Please think this over and send me a telegram or a letter.
FIRST OVERTURES FOR SURRENDER FROM DAVIS
TO P. P. BLAIR, SR.
WASHINGTON, January 18, 1865.
WASHINGTON, January 18, 1865.
F. P. BLAIR, ESQ.
F. P. Blair, Esq.
SIR:-You having shown me Mr. Davis's letter to you of the twelfth instant, you may say to him that I have constantly been, am now, and shall continue, ready to receive any agent whom he or any other influential person now resisting the national authority may informally send to me with the view of securing peace to the people of our one common country.
SIR: You showed me Mr. Davis's letter to you from the twelfth of this month. You can tell him that I have always been, I am currently, and I will keep being open to receiving any representative he or any other influential person currently opposing the national authority may informally send to me to help secure peace for our one shared country.
Yours, etc.,
Yours truly,
EXECUTIVE MANSION,
WASHINGTON, January 19, 1865.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT:
LT. GEN. GRANT:
Please read and answer this letter as though I was not President, but only a friend. My son, now in his twenty-second year, having graduated at Harvard, wishes to see something of the war before it ends. I do not wish to put him in the ranks, nor yet to give him a commission, to which those who have already served long are better entitled and better qualified to hold. Could he, without embarrassment to you, or detriment to the service, go into your military family with some nominal rank, I, and not the public, furnishing his necessary means? If no, say so without the least hesitation, because I am as anxious and as deeply interested that you shall not be encumbered as you can be yourself.
Please read and respond to this letter as if I were just a friend and not the President. My son, who is now 22 and has graduated from Harvard, wants to experience some of the war before it ends. I don’t want to enlist him as a soldier, nor do I want to give him a commission, which others who have served longer are more deserving and better qualified to hold. If he could join your military team with a minor rank, without causing you any embarrassment or harming the service, I would cover his expenses myself and not involve the public. If that’s not possible, please tell me without hesitation, because I care as much about not burdening you as you do.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL DODGE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 19, 1865.
MAJOR-GENERAL DODGE, Saint Louis, Mo.:
MAJ GEN DODGE, St. Louis, MO:
If Mrs. Beattie, alias Mrs. Wolff, shall be sentenced to death, notify me, and postpone the execution till further order.
If Mrs. Beattie, also known as Mrs. Wolff, is sentenced to death, let me know, and delay the execution until I give further instructions.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL ORD.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 19, 1864
MAJOR-GENERAL ORD:
MAJOR-GENERAL ORD:
You have a man in arrest for desertion passing by the name of Stanley. William Stanley, I think, but whose real name is different. He is the son of so close a friend of mine that I must not let him be executed. Please let me know what is his present and prospective condition.
You have a guy in custody for desertion who goes by the name Stanley. William Stanley, I believe, but his real name is something else. He’s the son of a close friend of mine, so I can’t let him be executed. Please tell me what his current situation is and what his future looks like.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. M. DODGE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 24, 1865.
MAJOR-GENERAL DODGE, St. Louis, Mo.:
MAJOR-GENERAL DODGE, St. Louis, MO:
It is said an old lady in Clay County, Missouri, by name Mrs. Winifred B. Price, is about being sent South. If she is not misbehaving let her remain.
It’s said that an elderly woman in Clay County, Missouri, named Mrs. Winifred B. Price, is about to be sent South. If she isn’t causing any trouble, let her stay.
TELEGRAM TO GOVERNOR JOHNSON.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 24, 1865.
HON. ANDREW JOHNSON, Nashville, Tennessee:
Hon. Andrew Johnson, Nashville, TN:
Several members of the Cabinet, with myself, considered the question, to-day, as to the time of your coming on here. While we fully appreciate your wish to remain in Tennessee until her State government shall be completely reinaugurated, it is our unanimous conclusion that it is unsafe for you to not be here on the 4th of March. Be sure to reach here by that time.
Several members of the Cabinet, including myself, discussed when you should arrive here today. We completely understand your desire to stay in Tennessee until its state government is fully reinstated, but we all agree it's not safe for you to stay away until March 4th. Make sure to be here by then.
REPLY TO A COMMITTEE, JANUARY 24, 1865.
REVEREND SIR, AND LADIES AND GENTLEMEN:
I accept with emotions of profoundest gratitude, the beautiful gift you have been pleased to present to me. You will, of course, expect that I acknowledge it. So much has been said about Gettysburg and so well, that for me to attempt to say more may perhaps only serve to weaken the force of that which has already been said. A most graceful and eloquent tribute was paid to the patriotism and self-denying labors of the American ladies, on the occasion of the consecration of the National Cemetery at Gettysburg, by our illustrious friend, Edward Everett, now, alas! departed from earth. His life was a truly great one, and I think the greatest part of it was that which crowned its closing years, I wish you to read, if you have not already done so, the eloquent and truthful words which he then spoke of the women of America. Truly, the services they have rendered to the defenders of our country in this perilous time, and are yet rendering, can never be estimated as they ought to be. For your kind wishes to me personally, I beg leave to render you likewise my sincerest thanks. I assure you they are reciprocated. And now, gentlemen and ladies, may God bless you all.
I accept with deep gratitude the wonderful gift you have kindly given me. You’d expect me to acknowledge it. So much has been said about Gettysburg, and so well, that my attempt to add more might only lessen the impact of what has already been expressed. A lovely and powerful tribute was paid to the patriotism and selfless efforts of American women during the dedication of the National Cemetery at Gettysburg by our esteemed friend, Edward Everett, who has sadly passed away. His life was truly remarkable, and I believe the best part of it was the way it ended. I want you to read, if you haven’t already, the moving and honest words he spoke about the women of America. Truly, the contributions they have made to support our country's defenders during this challenging time, and continue to make, can never be appreciated as they should be. For your kind wishes to me personally, I sincerely thank you in return. I assure you, they are appreciated. And now, ladies and gentlemen, may God bless you all.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL GRANT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 25, 1865.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point
LT. GEN. GRANT, City Point
If Newell W. Root, of First Connecticut Heavy Artillery, is under sentence of death, please telegraph me briefly the circumstances.
If Newell W. Root from the First Connecticut Heavy Artillery is facing the death penalty, please send me a brief telegram with the details.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL GRANT.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., January 25, 1865.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
LT. GEN. GRANT, City Point, VA:
Having received the report in the case of Newell W. Root, I do not interfere further in the case.
Having received the report on the Newell W. Root case, I will not involve myself any further.
EARLY CONSULTATIONS WITH REBELS
INSTRUCTIONS TO MAJOR ECKERT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 30, 1865.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 30, 1865.
MAJOR T. T. ECKERT.
MAJOR T.T. ECKERT.
SIR:-You will proceed with the documents placed in your hands, and on reaching General Ord will deliver him the letter addressed to him by the Secretary of War. Then, by General Ord's assistance procure an interview with Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell, or any of them, deliver to him or them the paper on which your own letter is written. Note on the copy which you retain the time of delivery and to whom delivered. Receive their answer in writing, waiting a reasonable time for it, and which, if it contain their decision to come through without further condition, will be your warrant to ask General Ord to pass them through as directed in the letter of the Secretary of War to him. If by their answer they decline to come, or propose other terms, do not have them pass through. And this being your whole duty, return and report to me.
SIR: You will take the documents given to you, and upon reaching General Ord, deliver him the letter from the Secretary of War. Then, with General Ord's help, arrange a meeting with Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell, or any of them, and give them the paper on which your letter is written. Make a note on the copy you keep about the time of delivery and to whom it was delivered. Wait a reasonable amount of time for their written response, which, if it states they agree to come through without further conditions, will give you the authority to ask General Ord to let them pass as outlined in the Secretary of War's letter to him. If their response declines to come or suggests other terms, do not let them pass. After completing this task, return and report back to me.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM FROM SECRETARY OF WAR TO GENERAL ORD.
(Cipher.)
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., January 30, 1865.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D.C., January 30, 1865.
MAJOR-GENERAL ORD, Headquarters Army of the James:
MAJOR-GENERAL ORD, Headquarters Army of the James:
By direction of the President you are instructed to inform the three gentlemen, Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell, that a messenger will be dispatched to them at or near where they now are, without unnecessary delay.
By the President's order, you are instructed to inform the three gentlemen, Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell, that a messenger will be sent to them at or near their current location, without any unnecessary delay.
EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
INDORSEMENT ON A LETTER FROM J. M. ASHLEY.
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, January 31, 1865.
DEAR SIR:—The report is in circulation in the House that Peace Commissioners are on their way or in the city, and is being used against us. If it is true, I fear we shall lose the bill. Please authorize me to contradict it, if it is not true.
DEAR SIR:—There’s a rumor going around in the House that Peace Commissioners are either on their way or already in the city, and it’s being used against us. If it’s true, I’m worried we’ll lose the bill. Please give me the authority to deny it if it’s not true.
Respectfully, J. M. ASHLEY.
Respectfully, J.M. Ashley.
To the President.
To the President.
(Indorsement.)
(Approval.)
So far as I know there are no Peace Commissioners in the city or likely to be in it.
As far as I know, there are no Peace Commissioners in the city, and none are expected to be.
A. LINCOLN. January 31, 1865
A. LINCOLN. January 31, 1865
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 31, 1865
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
LT. GEN. GRANT, City Point, VA:
A messenger is coming to you on the business contained in your despatch. Detain the gentlemen in comfortable quarters until he arrives, and then act upon the message he brings, as far as applicable, it having been made up to pass through General Ord's hands, and when the gentlemen were supposed to be beyond our lines.
A messenger is on the way to you with the information in your message. Keep the gentlemen in a comfortable place until he gets there, and then follow up on the message he brings, as far as it applies, since it was meant to go through General Ord's hands and when the gentlemen were thought to be outside our lines.
INSTRUCTIONS TO SECRETARY SEWARD.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 31, 1865.
HON. WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State
HON. WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State
You will proceed to Fortress Monroe, Virginia, there to meet and informally confer with Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell, on the basis of my letter to F. P. Blair, Esq., of January 18, 1865, a copy of which you have. You will make known to them that three things are indispensable to wit:
You will go to Fortress Monroe, Virginia, to meet and have an informal discussion with Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell, based on my letter to F. P. Blair, Esq., from January 18, 1865, a copy of which you have. You will let them know that three things are essential, namely:
1. The restoration of the national authority throughout all the States.
1. The restoration of the national authority across all the states.
2. No receding by the Executive of the United States on the slavery question from the position assumed thereon in the late annual message to Congress, and in preceding documents.
2. The Executive of the United States must not back down on the slavery issue from the stance taken in the recent annual message to Congress and in earlier documents.
3. No cessation of hostilities short of an end of the war and the disbanding of all forces hostile to the Government.
3. There will be no stopping of fighting until the war is over and all forces opposing the Government are disbanded.
You will inform them that all propositions of theirs, not inconsistent with the above, will be considered and passed upon in a spirit of sincere liberality. You will hear all they may choose to say and report it to me. You will not assume to definitely consummate anything.
You will let them know that any of their proposals that align with the above will be taken into account and reviewed with genuine openness. You will listen to everything they have to say and report it back to me. You will not take it upon yourself to finalize anything.
Yours, etc.,
Best regards,
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT FOR THE ABOLISHING OF SLAVERY
PASSAGE THROUGH CONGRESS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT FOR THE ABOLISHING OF SLAVERY
PASSAGE THROUGH CONGRESS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT FOR THE ABOLITION OF SLAVERY
RESPONSE TO A SERENADE, JANUARY 31, 1865.
RESPONSE TO A SERENADE, JANUARY 31, 1865.
He supposed the passage through Congress of the Constitutional amendment for the abolishing of slavery throughout the United States was the occasion to which he was indebted for the honor of this call.
He thought the passage of the Constitutional amendment to abolish slavery throughout the United States was the reason he received this call.
The occasion was one of congratulation to the country, and to the whole world. But there is a task yet before us—to go forward and consummate by the votes of the States that which Congress so nobly began yesterday. He had the honor to inform those present that Illinois had already done the work. Maryland was about half through, but he felt proud that Illinois was a little ahead.
The event was a moment of celebration for the country and the whole world. However, we still have work to do—to move ahead and complete the effort that Congress so valiantly started yesterday with the votes of the States. He had the privilege of informing everyone that Illinois had already made significant progress. Maryland was about halfway there, but he felt proud that Illinois was a step ahead.
He thought this measure was a very fitting if not an indispensable adjunct to the winding up of the great difficulty. He wished the reunion of all the States perfected, and so effected as to remove all causes of disturbance in the future; and, to attain this end, it was necessary that the original disturbing cause should, if possible, be rooted out. He thought all would bear him witness that he had never shirked from doing all that he could to eradicate slavery, by issuing an Emancipation Proclamation. But that proclamation falls short of what the amendment will be when fully consummated. A question might be raised whether the proclamation was legally valid. It might be added, that it only aided those who came into our lines, and that it was inoperative as to those who did not give themselves up; or that it would have no effect upon the children of the slaves born hereafter; in fact, it would be urged that it did not meet the evil. But this amendment is a king's cure for all evils. It winds the whole thing up. He would repeat, that it was the fitting if not the indispensable adjunct to the consummation of the great game we are playing. He could not but congratulate all present—himself, the country, and the whole world upon this great moral victory.
He believed this measure was not just fitting but essential for resolving the significant challenge. He wanted the complete reunion of all the States, achieved in a way that would eliminate any future conflicts. To accomplish this, it was crucial to eradicate the original source of the disturbance if possible. He thought everyone would agree that he had never shied away from doing everything he could to end slavery by issuing an Emancipation Proclamation. However, that proclamation doesn't fully compare to what the amendment will accomplish once it is fully realized. There could be questions about whether the proclamation was legally valid. It could be argued that it only benefited those who came into our lines and didn’t apply to those who remained in rebellion, or that it would have no impact on the future children of enslaved people. In fact, some might say it did not effectively address the problem. But this amendment is a comprehensive solution to all issues. It wraps everything up. He would reiterate that it is a fitting, if not absolutely necessary, part of completing the significant task we are undertaking. He felt compelled to congratulate everyone present—himself, the nation, and the entire world—on this great moral victory.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, February 1, 1865
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point:
Let nothing which is transpiring change, hinder, or delay your military movements or plans.
Let nothing that’s happening change, obstruct, or delay your military movements or plans.
TELEGRAM TO MAJOR ECKERT. WASHINGTON, D. C., February 1, 1865.
MAJOR T. T. ECKERT, Care of General Grant, City Point, Va.:
Call at Fortress Monroe, and put yourself under direction of Mr. Seward, whom you will find there.
Call at Fortress Monroe and put yourself under the guidance of Mr. Seward, whom you will find there.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., February 2, 1865
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
Say to the gentlemen I will meet them personally at Fortress Monroe as soon as I can get there.
Tell the gentlemen that I will meet them in person at Fortress Monroe as soon as I can get there.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY SEWARD, WASHINGTON, D. C., February 2, 1865.
HON. WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Fortress Monroe, Va.
Induced by a despatch of General Grant, I join you at Fort Monroe, as soon as I can come.
Induced by a message from General Grant, I will join you at Fort Monroe as soon as I can.
ORDER TO MAKE CORRECTIONS IN THE DRAFT.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON CITY, February 6, 1865
Whereas complaints are made in some localities respecting the assignments of quotas and credits allowed for the pending call of troops to fill up the armies: Now, in order to determine all controversies in respect thereto, and to avoid any delay in filling up the armies, it is ordered,
Where complaints have been made in some areas about the assignments of quotas and credits for the upcoming call of troops to complete the armies: Now, to resolve all issues related to this and to prevent any delays in filling the armies, it is ordered,
1. That the Attorney-General, Brigadier-General Richard Delafield, and Colonel C. W. Foster, be, and they are hereby constituted, a board to examine into the proper quotas and credits of the respective States and districts under the call of December 19, 1864, with directions, if any errors be found therein, to make such corrections as the law and facts may require, and report their determination to the Provost-Marshal-General. The determination of said board to be final and conclusive, and the draft to be made in conformity therewith.
1. The Attorney-General, Brigadier-General Richard Delafield, and Colonel C. W. Foster are hereby appointed to a board tasked with reviewing the appropriate quotas and credits of the various States and districts based on the call from December 19, 1864. If any errors are found, they are directed to make the necessary corrections according to the law and the facts, and to report their findings to the Provost-Marshal-General. The decisions made by this board will be final and binding, and the draft will be done in accordance with those decisions.
2. The Provost-Marshal-General is ordered to make the draft in the respective districts as speedily as the same can be done after the fifteenth of this month.
2. The Provost-Marshal-General is directed to carry out the draft in the various districts as quickly as possible after the fifteenth of this month.
TO PROVOST-MARSHAL-GENERAL.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 6, 1865.
PROVOST-MARSHAL-GENERAL:
Provost Marshal General:
These gentlemen distinctly say to me this morning that what they want is the means from your office of showing their people that the quota assigned to them is right. They think it will take but little time—two hours, they say. Please give there double the time and every facility you can.
These gentlemen clearly told me this morning that what they need is help from your office to show their people that the quota assigned to them is correct. They believe it will only take a short time—two hours, they said. Please give them double the time and any support you can.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
February 6, 1865.
February 6, 1865.
The Provost-Marshal brings this letter back to me and says he cannot give the facility required without detriment to the service, and thereupon he is excused from doing it.
The Provost-Marshal returns this letter to me and says he can't provide the necessary support without harming the service, so he is relieved from doing it.
TELEGRAM TO LIEUTENANT-COLONEL GLENN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 7, 1865.
LIEUTENANT-COLONEL GLENN, Commanding Post at Henderson, Ky.:
LIEUTENANT-COLONEL GLENN, in charge of the post at Henderson, KY:
Complaint is made to me that you are forcing negroes into the military service, and even torturing them—riding them on rails and the like to extort their consent. I hope this may be a mistake. The like must not be done by you, or any one under you. You must not force negroes any more than white men. Answer me on this.
Complaint has been brought to my attention that you are forcing Black people into military service and even torturing them—like riding them on rails to make them agree. I hope this is a misunderstanding. Such actions must not be carried out by you or anyone under your supervision. You must not force Black people any more than white individuals. Respond to me about this.
TO GOVERNOR SMITH.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 8, 1865.
HIS EXCELLENCY GOVERNOR SMITH, of Vermont:
HIS EXCELLENCY GOVERNOR SMITH, of Vermont:
Complaint is made to me, by Vermont, that the assignment of her quota for the draft on the pending call is intrinsically unjust, and also in bad faith of the Government's promise to fairly allow credits for men previously furnished. To illustrate, a supposed case is stated as follows:
Complaint has been made to me by Vermont that the assignment of her draft quota for the upcoming call is fundamentally unfair and also goes against the government's promise to fairly credit for men provided before. To explain this, a hypothetical situation is presented as follows:
Vermont and New Hampshire must between them furnish six thousand men on the pending call; and being equal, each must furnish as many as the other in the long run. But the Government finds that on former calls Vermont furnished a surplus of five hundred, and New Hampshire a surplus, of fifteen hundred. These two surpluses making two thousand and added to the six thousand, making eight thousand to be furnished by the two States, or four thousand each less, by fair credits. Then subtract Vermont's surplus of five hundred from her four thousand, leaves three thousand five hundred as her quota on the pending call; and likewise subtract New Hampshire's surplus of fifteen hundred from her four thousand, leaves two thousand five hundred as her quota on the pending call. These three thousand five hundred and two thousand five hundred make precisely six thousand, which the supposed case requires from the two States, and it is just equal for Vermont to furnish one thousand more now than New Hampshire, because New Hampshire has heretofore furnished one thousand more than Vermont, which equalizes the burdens of the two in the long run. And this result, so far from being bad faith to Vermont, is indispensable to keeping good faith with New Hampshire. By no other result can the six thousand men be obtained from the two States, and, at the same time deal justly and keep faith with both, and we do but confuse ourselves in questioning the process by which the right result is reached. The supposed case is perfect as an illustration.
Vermont and New Hampshire need to provide a total of six thousand men for the upcoming call; since they are equal, each should contribute the same number over time. However, the Government has found that in past calls, Vermont provided five hundred more than required, while New Hampshire provided fifteen hundred more. These two surpluses add up to two thousand, bringing the total needed from both states to eight thousand, or four thousand each after fair adjustments. When we subtract Vermont's surplus of five hundred from her four thousand, her quota for the current call comes out to three thousand five hundred. Similarly, when we subtract New Hampshire's surplus of fifteen hundred from her four thousand, her quota for the current call is two thousand five hundred. Together, these total six thousand, which is exactly what is needed from both states. Therefore, it's reasonable for Vermont to provide one thousand more than New Hampshire now because New Hampshire has contributed one thousand more in the past, balancing the responsibilities over time. This arrangement is not unfair to Vermont; it's crucial for maintaining fairness to New Hampshire. There’s no other way to meet the six thousand requirement from both states while being fair to both, and any doubts about how this conclusion is reached only complicate the matter. This scenario serves as a perfect example.
The pending call is not for three hundred thousand men subject to fair credits, but is for three hundred thousand remaining after all fair credits have been deducted, and it is impossible to concede what Vermont asks without coming out short of three hundred thousand men, or making other localities pay for the partiality shown her.
The upcoming call is not for three hundred thousand men who are eligible for fair credits, but for three hundred thousand remaining after all fair credits have been accounted for. It's impossible to agree to what Vermont requests without falling short of three hundred thousand men or making other areas compensate for the favoritism shown to her.
This upon the case stated. If there be different reasons for making an allowance to Vermont, let them be presented and considered.
This is regarding the case mentioned. If there are different reasons for granting an allowance to Vermont, let them be brought forward and discussed.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
MESSAGE TO CONGRESS.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, February 8, 1865.
TO THE HONORABLE THE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
TO THE HONORABLE SENATE AND HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
The joint resolution entitled "Joint resolution declaring certain States not entitled to representation in the electoral college" has been signed by the Executive in deference to the view of Congress implied in its passage and presentation to him. In his own view, however, the two Houses of Congress, convened under the twelfth article of the Constitution, have complete power to exclude from counting all electoral votes deemed by them to be illegal, and it is not competent for the Executive to defeat or obstruct that power by a veto, as would be the case if his action were at all essential in the matter. He disclaims all right of the Executive to interfere in any way in the matter of canvassing or counting electoral votes, and he also disclaims that by signing said resolution he has expressed any opinion on the recitals of the preamble or any judgment of his own upon the subject of the resolution.
The joint resolution titled "Joint resolution declaring certain States not entitled to representation in the electoral college" has been signed by the Executive in accordance with Congress's implied views in its passage and presentation to him. However, he believes that both Houses of Congress, meeting under the twelfth article of the Constitution, have full authority to exclude any electoral votes they consider illegal, and it's not within the Executive's power to override that authority with a veto, as he would be doing if his action were essential to the situation. He rejects any right for the Executive to interfere in the process of canvassing or counting electoral votes, and he also disclaims that by signing this resolution, he has expressed any opinion on the preamble's statements or any judgment of his own concerning the resolution.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February
8, 1865
8, 1865
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point. Va.:
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, VA:
I am called on by the House of Representatives to give an account of my interview with Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell, and it is very desirable to me to put your despatch of February 1, to the Secretary of War, in which, among other things, you say: "I fear now their going back without any expression from any one in authority will have a bad influence." I think the despatch does you credit, while I do not see that it can embarrass you. May I use it?
I’ve been asked by the House of Representatives to report on my meeting with Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell. It's important for me to reference your message from February 1 to the Secretary of War, where you mention, "I worry that if they leave without any acknowledgment from someone in charge, it will have a negative impact." I believe this message reflects well on you, and I don’t think it will cause you any trouble. Can I go ahead and use it?
RESULT OF THE ELECTORAL COUNT
REPLY TO A COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS, REPORTING THE RESULT OF THE ELECTORAL COUNT,
REPLY TO A COMMITTEE OF CONGRESS, REPORTING THE RESULT OF THE ELECTORAL COUNT,
FEBRUARY 9, 1865.
February 9, 1865.
With deep gratitude to my countrymen for this mark of their confidence; with a distrust of my own ability to perform the duty required under the most favorable circumstances, and now rendered doubly difficult by existing national perils; yet with a firm reliance on the strength of our free government, and the eventual loyalty of the people to the just principles upon which it is founded, and above all with an unshaken faith in the Supreme Ruler of nations, I accept this trust. Be pleased to signify this to the respective Houses of Congress.
With deep gratitude to my fellow citizens for their trust in me; with doubt about my ability to fulfill the duty expected of me, especially under the challenging circumstances we face; yet with a strong belief in the resilience of our democratic government and the eventual loyalty of the people to the fair principles it stands on, and above all, with unwavering faith in the Supreme Ruler of nations, I accept this responsibility. Please communicate this to the respective Houses of Congress.
CHRONOLOGIC REVIEW OF PEACE PROPOSALS
MESSAGE TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, February 10, 1865
EXECUTIVE MANSION, February 10, 1865
TO THE HONORABLE THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
TO THE HONORABLE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES:
In response to your resolution of the eighth instant, requesting information in relation to a conference recently held in Hampton Roads, I have the honor to state that on the day of the date I gave Francis P. Blair, Sr., a card, written on as follows, to wit:
In response to your request from the eighth of this month for information regarding a conference recently held in Hampton Roads, I am honored to state that on that day I gave Francis P. Blair, Sr. a card that read as follows:
December 28, 1864.
December 28, 1864.
Allow the bearer, F. P. Blair, Sr., to pass our lines, go South, and return.
Allow F. P. Blair, Sr. to pass through our lines, head South, and come back.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
That at the time I was informed that Mr. Blair sought the card as a means of getting to Richmond, Va., but he was given no authority to speak or act for the Government, nor was I informed of anything he would say or do on his own account or otherwise. Afterwards Mr. Blair told me that he had been to Richmond and had seen Mr. Jefferson Davis; and he (Mr. B.) at the same time left with me a manuscript letter, as follows, to wit:
That at the time I was told that Mr. Blair wanted the card to travel to Richmond, Va., but he wasn’t given permission to speak or act for the Government, nor was I informed about anything he would say or do on his own or otherwise. Later, Mr. Blair told me that he had gone to Richmond and met Mr. Jefferson Davis; and he (Mr. B.) also left me a handwritten letter, as follows:
RICHMOND, VA., January 12, 1865. F. P. BLAIR, ESQ.
RICHMOND, VA., January 12, 1865. F. P. BLAIR, ESQ.
SIR: I have deemed it proper, and probably desirable to you, to give you in this for in the substance of remarks made by me, to be repeated by you to President Lincoln, etc., etc.
SIR: I thought it would be appropriate and likely helpful for you to have the key points from my comments, which you can share with President Lincoln, etc., etc.
I have no disposition to find obstacles in forms, and am willing, now as heretofore, to enter into negotiations for the restoration of peace, and am ready to send a commission whenever I have reason to suppose it will be received, or to receive a commission if the United States Government shall choose to send one. That notwithstanding the rejection of our former offers, I would, if you could promise that a commissioner, minister, or other agent would be received, appoint one immediately, and renew the effort to enter into conference with a view to secure peace to the two countries.
I’m not looking to create obstacles and am open, as I have been before, to negotiating for peace. I’m ready to send a team whenever I believe it will be accepted, or to welcome a team if the United States Government decides to send one. Even though our previous offers were rejected, I would appoint a commissioner, minister, or another representative right away if you could assure me that they would be welcomed, and restart the conversation to achieve peace between our two nations.
Yours, etc., JEFFERSON DAVIS.
Yours truly, JEFFERSON DAVIS.
Afterwards, and with the view that it should be shown to Mr. Davis, I wrote and delivered to Mr. Blair a letter, as follows, to wit:
Afterward, with the intention that it should be shown to Mr. Davis, I wrote and handed Mr. Blair a letter that said:
WASHINGTON, January 18, 1865.
WASHINGTON, January 18, 1865.
P. P. BLAIR, ESQ.
P.P. Blair, Esq.
SIR:—Your having shown me Mr. Davis's letter to you of the twelfth instant, you may say to him that I have constantly been, am now, and shall continue ready to receive any agent whom he or any other influential person now resisting the national authority may informally send to me with the view of securing peace to the people of our one common country.
SIR:—Since you showed me Mr. Davis's letter from the twelfth of this month, you can tell him that I have always been, am currently, and will remain ready to receive any representative he or any other influential person currently opposing the national authority may informally send to me to help secure peace for the people of our shared country.
Yours, etc.,
Yours sincerely,
Afterwards Mr. Blair dictated for and authorized me to make an entry on
the back of my retained copy of the letter last above recited, which entry is as follows:
the back of my kept copy of the letter mentioned above, which entry is as follows:
January 28, 1865
To-day Mr. Blair tells me that on the twenty-first instant he delivered to Mr. Davis the original of which the within is a copy, and left it with him; that at the time of delivering it Mr. Davis read it over twice in Mr. Blair's presence, at the close of which he (Mr. Blair) remarked that the part about "our one common country" related to the part of Mr. Davis' letter about "the two countries," to which Mr. Davis replied that he so understood it.
Today, Mr. Blair tells me that on the twenty-first of this month, he delivered to Mr. Davis the original document, of which this is a copy, and left it with him. At the time of the delivery, Mr. Davis read it over twice in Mr. Blair's presence, after which Mr. Blair pointed out that the part about "our one common country" referred to the section of Mr. Davis' letter about "the two countries," to which Mr. Davis responded that he understood it that way.
Afterwards the Secretary of War placed in my hands the following telegram,
indorsed by him, as appears:
endorsed by him, as shown:
OFFICE UNITED STATES MILITARY TELEGRAPH WAR DEPARTMENT. The following telegram received at Washington January 29, 1865, from headquarters Army of James,
OFFICE UNITED STATES MILITARY TELEGRAPH WAR DEPARTMENT. The following telegram was received in Washington on January 29, 1865, from headquarters Army of James,
6.30 P.M., January 29, 1865:
6:30 PM, January 29, 1865:
"HON. EDWIN M. STANTON," Secretary of War:
"HON. EDWIN M. STANTON," Secretary of War:
"The following despatch just received from Major-General Parke, who refers it to me for my action. I refer it to you in Lieutenant-General Grant's absence:
"The following message just arrived from Major-General Parke, who is sending it to me for my response. I'm passing it on to you in Lieutenant-General Grant's absence:"
"E. O. C. ORD, Major-General, Commanding. HEADQUARTERS ARMY OF POTOMAC, January 29, 1863. 4 P.M." 'MAJOR-GENERAL E. O. C. ORD, 'Headquarters Army of James: 'The following despatch is forwarded to you for your action. Since I have no knowledge of General Grant's having had any understanding of this kind, I refer the matter to you as the ranking officer present in the two armies. 'JNO. G. PARKE, Major-General, Commanding.'
"E. O. C. ORD, Major General, Commanding. HEADQUARTERS ARMY OF POTOMAC, January 29, 1863. 4 P.M." 'MAJOR GENERAL E. O. C. ORD, 'Headquarters Army of James: 'I'm sending you the following message for your attention. Since I’m not aware of General Grant having any agreement like this, I’m referring the matter to you as the senior officer present in the two armies. 'JNO. G. PARKE, Major General, Commanding.'
"'FROM HEADQUARTERS NINTH ARMY Cos, 29th. 'MAJOR-GENERAL JNO. G. PARKE, 'Headquarters Army of Potomac: 'Alexander H. Stephens, R. M. T. Hunter, and J. A. Campbell desire to cross my lines, in accordance with an understanding claimed to exist with Lieutenant-General Grant, on their way to Washington as peace commissioners. Shall they be admitted? They desire an early answer, to come through immediately. Would like to reach City Point tonight if they can. If they can not do this, they would like to come through at 10 A.M. to-morrow morning. 'O. B. WILCOX, 'Major-General, Commanding Ninth Corps.'
"'FROM HEADQUARTERS NINTH ARMY Cos, 29th. 'MAJOR-GENERAL JNO. G. PARKE, 'Headquarters Army of Potomac: 'Alexander H. Stephens, R. M. T. Hunter, and J. A. Campbell want to cross my lines, based on an agreement they claim exists with Lieutenant-General Grant, on their way to Washington as peace commissioners. Should they be allowed in? They would like a quick response, to come through right away. They want to reach City Point tonight if possible. If that doesn't work out, they'd like to come through at 10 A.M. tomorrow morning. 'O. B. WILCOX, 'Major-General, Commanding Ninth Corps.'
"January 29, 8.30 P.M. "Respectfully referred to the President for such instructions as he may be pleased to give. "EDWIN M. STANTON, "Secretary of War."
"January 29, 8:30 PM "Respectfully sent to the President for any instructions he wishes to provide. "EDWIN M. STANTON, "Secretary of War."
It appears that about the time of placing the foregoing telegram in my hands the Secretary of War dispatched General Ord as follows, to wit:
It seems that around the time I was given the previous telegram, the Secretary of War sent General Ord with the following message:
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON CITY, January 29, 1865. 10 P.M. (Sent at 2 A.M., 30th.) MAJOR-GENERAL ORD.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON CITY, January 29, 1865. 10 PM. (Sent at 2 AM, 30th.) MAJOR-GENERAL ORD.
SIR:—This Department has no knowledge of any understanding by General Grant to allow any person to come within his lines as commissioner of any sort. You will therefore allow no one to come into your lines under such character or profession until you receive the President's instructions, to whom your telegraph will be submitted for his directions.
SIR:—This Department is unaware of any agreement made by General Grant allowing anyone to enter his lines as a commissioner of any kind. Therefore, you should not permit anyone to come into your lines under such a role or title until you receive instructions from the President, to whom your telegraph will be sent for his directions.
EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
Afterwards, by my direction, the Secretary of War telegraphed General Ord as follows, to wit:
After that, following my instructions, the Secretary of War sent a telegram to General Ord that said:
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D.C., January 30. 10.30 A.M.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D.C., January 30. 10:30 A.M.
MAJOR-GENERAL E. O. C. ORD, Headquarters Army of the James.
MAJOR-GENERAL E. O. C. ORD, Headquarters Army of the James.
SIR:—By direction of the President, you are instructed to inform the three gentlemen, Messrs. Stephens, Hunter and Campbell, that a messenger will be dispatched to them at or near where they now are without unnecessary delay.
SIR:—As directed by the President, you are to inform the three gentlemen, Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell, that a messenger will be sent to them at or near their current location without any unnecessary delay.
EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
Afterwards I prepared and put into the hands of Major Thomas T. Eckert the following instructions and message:
After that, I prepared and handed Major Thomas T. Eckert the following instructions and message:
EXECUTIVE MANSION,
White House
MAJOR T. T. ECKERT. WASHINGTON, January 30, 1865
MAJOR T. T. ECKERT. WASHINGTON, January 30, 1865
SIR:—You will proceed with the documents placed in your hands, and on reaching General Ord will deliver him the letter addressed to him by the Secretary of War; then, by General Ord's assistance, procure an interview with Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell, or any of them. Deliver to him or them the paper on which your own letter is written. Note on the copy which you retain the time of delivery and to whom delivered. Receive their answer in writing, waiting a reasonable time for it, and which, if it contain their decision to come through without further condition, will be your warrant to ask General Ord to pass them through, as directed in the letter of the Secretary of War to him. If by their answer they decline to come, or propose other terms, do not have them pass through. And this being your whole duty, return and report to me.
SIR:—You will take the documents given to you and, upon reaching General Ord, deliver him the letter from the Secretary of War addressed to him. Then, with General Ord's help, arrange a meeting with Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell, or whoever is available. Give him or them the paper on which your own letter is written. Make a note on the copy you keep of the delivery time and to whom it was given. Wait a reasonable amount of time for their written response. If it states that they will proceed without any further conditions, you can ask General Ord to allow them to pass through, as instructed in the Secretary of War's letter to him. If their answer indicates that they will not come or suggests other conditions, do not allow them to pass through. And having fulfilled your entire duty, return and report back to me.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
CITY POINT, VA.. February 1, 1865.
CITY POINT, VA. February 1, 1865.
MESSRS. ALEXANDER H. STEPHENS, J. A. CAMPBELL AND R. M. T. HUNTER.
MESSRS. ALEXANDER H. STEPHENS, J. A. CAMPBELL AND R. M. T. HUNTER.
GENTLEMEN:—I am instructed by the President of the United States to place this paper in your hands, with the information that if you pass through the United States military lines it will be understood that you do so for the purpose of an informal conference on the basis of the letter a copy of which is on the reverse side of this sheet, and that if you choose to pass on such understanding, and so notify me in writing, I will procure the commanding general to pass you through the lines and to Fortress Monroe under such military precautions as he may deem prudent, and at which place you will be met in due time by some person or persons for the purpose of such informal conference; and, further, that you shall have protection, safe conduct, and safe return in all events.
GENTLEMEN:—I have been directed by the President of the United States to give you this document, letting you know that if you cross the United States military lines, it will be understood that you are doing so for an informal conference based on the letter, a copy of which is on the back of this sheet. If you decide to proceed under this understanding and inform me in writing, I will arrange for the commanding general to allow you to pass through the lines and to Fortress Monroe, with any necessary military precautions he sees fit. There, you will be met in due time by someone for the purpose of the informal conference. Additionally, you will be granted protection, safe passage, and a secure return, regardless of the circumstances.
THOMAS T. ECKERT, Major and Aide-de-Camp.
THOMAS T. ECKERT, Major and Aide-de-Camp.
WASHINGTON, January 18, 1865. F. P. BLAIR, ESQ.
WASHINGTON, January 18, 1865. F. P. BLAIR, ESQ.
SIR:—Your having shown me Mr. Davis's letter to you of the twelfth instant, you may say to him that I have constantly been, am now, and shall continue ready to receive any agent whom he or any other influential person now resisting the national authority may informally send to me with the view of securing peace to the people of our one common country.
SIR:—Now that you've shown me Mr. Davis's letter from the twelfth of this month, you can tell him that I have always been, am currently, and will continue to be ready to meet with any representative he or any other influential person resisting the national authority may send to me informally in hopes of bringing peace to our shared country.
Yours, etc.,
Best regards,
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
Afterwards, but before Major Eckert had departed, the following dispatch was received from General Grant:
Afterward, but before Major Eckert left, the following message was received from General Grant:
OFFICE UNITED STATES MILITARY TELEGRAPH, WAR DEPARTMENT.
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES MILITARY TELEGRAPH, WAR DEPARTMENT.
The following telegram received at Washington January 30, 1865, from City Point, Va., 10.30 A.M., January 30, 1865:
The following telegram was received in Washington on January 30, 1865, from City Point, Va., at 10:30 A.M., January 30, 1865:
"His EXCELLENCY A. LINCOLN, President of the United States: "The following communication was received here last evening: "'PETERSBURG, VA., January 30, 1865. 'LIEUTENANT-GENERAL U.S. GRANT, Commanding Armies United States. 'SIR: We desire to pass your lines under safe conduct, and to proceed to Washington to hold a conference with President Lincoln upon the subject of the existing war, and with a view of ascertaining upon what terms it may be terminated, in pursuance of the course indicated by him in his letter to Mr. Blair of January 18, 1865, of which we presume you have a copy; and if not, we wish to see you in person, if convenient, and to confer with you upon the subject. 'Very respectfully, yours, 'ALEXANDER H. STEPHENS. 'J. A. CAMPBELL. 'R. M. T. HUNTER.'"
"His EXCELLENCY A. LINCOLN, President of the United States: "The following communication was received here last evening: "'PETERSBURG, VA., January 30, 1865. 'LIEUTENANT-GENERAL U.S. GRANT, Commanding Armies United States. 'SIR: We would like to pass through your lines with safe conduct and proceed to Washington to meet with President Lincoln regarding the ongoing war. We want to discuss how it may be ended, following the course he mentioned in his letter to Mr. Blair on January 18, 1865, which we assume you have a copy of; if not, we would like to meet with you in person, if that works for you, to talk about this. 'Very respectfully, yours, 'ALEXANDER H. STEPHENS. 'J. A. CAMPBELL. 'R. M. T. HUNTER.'"
"I have sent directions to receive these gentlemen, and expect to have them at my quarters this evening, awaiting your instructions. U.S. GRANT, Lieutenant-General, Commanding Armies United States."
"I've sent instructions for welcoming these gentlemen and expect them to arrive at my quarters this evening, waiting for your directives. U.S. GRANT, Lieutenant-General, Commanding Armies United States."
This, it will be perceived, transferred General Ord's agency in the matter to General Grant. I resolved, however, to send Major Eckert forward with his message, and accordingly telegraphed General Grant as follows, to wit:
This, as you can see, passed General Ord's responsibility in the matter to General Grant. I decided, however, to send Major Eckert ahead with his message, and so I telegraphed General Grant as follows:
EXECUTIVE MANSION WASHINGTON, January 13, 1865 (Sent at 1.30 P.M.)
EXECUTIVE MANSION WASHINGTON, January 13, 1865 (Sent at 1:30 PM)
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
LT. GEN. GRANT, City Point, VA:
A messenger is coming to you on the business contained in your despatch. Detain the gentlemen in comfortable quarters until he arrives, and then act upon the message he brings as far as applicable, it having been made up to pass through General Ord's hands, and when the gentlemen were supposed to be beyond our lines.
A messenger is on the way to you regarding the matters in your message. Keep the gentlemen in a comfortable place until he arrives, and then follow the instructions he brings as much as you can, since it was designed to go through General Ord's review, and when it was believed that the gentlemen were past our lines.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
When Major Eckert departed, he bore with him a letter of the Secretary of War to General Grant, as follows, to wit:
When Major Eckert left, he carried with him a letter from the Secretary of War to General Grant, which was as follows:
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., January 30, 1865.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., January 30, 1865.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, Commanding, etc.
LT. GEN. GRANT, Commanding, etc.
GENERAL:—The President desires that you will please procure for the bearer, Major Thomas T. Eckert, an interview with Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell, and if on his return to you he requests it pass them through our lines to Fortress Monroe by such route and under such military precautions as you may deem prudent, giving them protection and comfortable quarters while there, and that you let none of this have any effect upon your movements or plans.
GENERAL:—The President asks that you arrange for the bearer, Major Thomas T. Eckert, to meet with Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell. If he requests it upon his return, please allow them to cross our lines to Fortress Monroe via a route and with military precautions you consider wise, providing them protection and comfortable accommodations while they are there. Also, ensure that none of this affects your movements or plans.
By order of the President: EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
By order of the President: EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
Supposing the proper point to be then reached, I dispatched the Secretary of State with the following instructions, Major Eckert, however, going ahead of him:
Supposing the right moment had arrived, I sent the Secretary of State with these instructions, while Major Eckert went ahead of him:
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 31, 1865.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, January 31, 1865.
HON. WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State:
HON. WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State:
You will proceed to Fortress Monroe, Va., there to meet and informally confer with Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell on the basis of my letter to F. P. Blair, Esq., of January 18, 1865, a copy of which you have.
You will go to Fortress Monroe, VA, where you will meet and casually discuss with Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell based on my letter to F. P. Blair, Esq., dated January 18, 1865, a copy of which you have.
You will make known to them that three things are indispensable, to Wit:
You will let them know that three things are essential, namely:
1. The restoration of the national authority throughout all the States.
1. The restoration of national authority across all the states.
2. No receding by the Executive of the United States on the slavery question from the position assumed thereon in the late annual message to Congress and in preceding documents.
2. The Executive of the United States will not back down on the slavery issue from the stance taken in the recent annual message to Congress and in earlier documents.
3. No cessation of hostilities short of an end of the war and the disbanding of all forces hostile to the Government.
3. No end to the fighting will be accepted until the war is over and all forces that oppose the Government are disbanded.
You will inform them that all propositions of theirs not inconsistent with the above will be considered and passed upon in a spirit of sincere liberality. You will hear all they may choose to say and report it to me.
You will let them know that all their suggestions that align with the above will be considered seriously and evaluated with genuine openness. You'll listen to everything they have to say and update me on it.
You will not assume to definitely consummate anything.
You shouldn't expect to finalize anything for sure.
Yours, etc.,
Yours sincerely,
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
On the day of its date the following telegram was sent to General Grant:
On the day of its appointment, the following telegram was sent to General Grant:
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., February 1,1865 (Sent at 9.30 A.M.)
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., February 1, 1865 (Sent at 9:30 A.M.)
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
Lt. Gen. Grant, City Point, VA:
Let nothing which is transpiring change, hinder, or delay your military movements or plans.
Let nothing that’s happening change, stop, or delay your military movements or plans.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
Afterwards the following despatch was received from General Grant:
Afterward, the following message was received from General Grant:
OFFICE UNITED STATES MILITARY TELEGRAPH WAR DEPARTMENT. The following telegram received at Washington, 2.30 P.M., February 1, 1865, from City Point, Va., February 1, 12.30 PM., 1865:
OFFICE UNITED STATES MILITARY TELEGRAPH WAR DEPARTMENT. The following telegram was received in Washington at 2:30 PM on February 1, 1865, from City Point, Va., at 12:30 PM on February 1, 1865:
"His EXCELLENCY A. LINCOLN, President United States:
"His Excellency A. Lincoln, President of the United States:"
"Your despatch received. There will be no armistice in consequence of the presence of Mr. Stephens and others within our lines. The troops are kept in readiness to move at the shortest notice if occasion should justify it.
Your message was received. There will be no ceasefire due to Mr. Stephens and others being within our lines. The troops are on standby to move at a moment's notice if the situation calls for it.
"U.S. GRANT, Lieutenant-General."
"U.S. Grant, Lieutenant General."
To notify Major Eckert that the Secretary of State would be at Fortress Monroe, and to put them in communication, the following despatch was sent:
To inform Major Eckert that the Secretary of State would be at Fortress Monroe and to connect them, the following message was sent:
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., February 1, 1865.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., February 1, 1865.
MAJOR T. T. ECKERT, Care of General Grant, City Point, Va.:
MAJOR T. T. ECKERT, c/o General Grant
Call at Fortress Monroe and put yourself under direction of Mr. S., whom you will find there.
Call at Fortress Monroe and check in with Mr. S., who will be there to help you.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
On the morning of the 2d instant the following telegrams were received by me respectively from the Secretary of State and Major Eckert:
On the morning of the 2nd of this month, I received the following telegrams from the Secretary of State and Major Eckert:
FORT MONROE, VA., February 1,1865. 11.30 PM.
FORT MONROE, VA., February 1, 1865. 11:30 PM.
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES:
THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES:
Arrived at 10 this evening. Richmond party not here. I remain here.
Arrived at 10 tonight. The Richmond group isn't here. I'm staying here.
WILLIAM H. SEWARD.
WILLIAM H. SEWARD.
CITY POINT, VA., February 1, 1865. 10 P.M.
CITY POINT, VA., February 1, 1865. 10 PM.
HIS EXCELLENCY A. LINCOLN, President of the United States: I have the honor to report the delivery of your communication and my letter at 4.15 this afternoon, to which I received a reply at 6 P.M., but not satisfactory.
HIS EXCELLENCY A. LINCOLN, President of the United States: I have the honor to report that I delivered your message and my letter at 4:15 this afternoon, and I received a response at 6 PM, but it was not satisfactory.
At 8 P.M. the following note, addressed to General Grant, was received:
At 8 PM, the following note, addressed to General Grant, was received:
CITY POINT, VA., February 1, 1865
CITY POINT, VA., February 1, 1865
"LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT.
LIEUTENANT GENERAL GRANT.
"SIR:—We desire to go to Washington City to confer informally with the President personally in reference to the matters mentioned in his letter to Mr. Blair of the 18th January ultimo, without any personal compromise on any question in the letter. We have the permission to do so from the authorities in Richmond.
"SIR:—We would like to go to Washington, D.C. to have an informal discussion with the President about the issues mentioned in his letter to Mr. Blair dated January 18th of last month, without making any personal commitments on any of the topics in the letter. We have received permission to do this from the authorities in Richmond."
Very respectfully yours,
Sincerely yours,
ALEX. H. STEPHENS R. M. T. HUNTER. J. A. CAMPBELL."
ALEX. H. STEPHENS R. M. T. HUNTER. J. A. CAMPBELL.
At 9.30 P.M. I notified them that they could not proceed further unless they complied with the terms expressed in my letter. The point of meeting designated in the above note would not, in my opinion, be insisted upon. Think Fort Monroe would be acceptable. Having complied with my instructions, I will return to Washington to-morrow unless otherwise ordered.
At 9:30 PM, I let them know that they couldn't move forward unless they followed the terms I mentioned in my letter. I don't think they'll insist on the meeting location noted above. I believe Fort Monroe would be okay. Since I've followed my instructions, I will go back to Washington tomorrow unless told otherwise.
THOS. T. ECKERT, Major, etc.
THOS. T. ECKERT, Major, etc.
On reading this despatch of Major Eckert I was about to recall him and the Secretary of State, when the following telegram of General Grant to the Secretary of War was shown me:
On reading this message from Major Eckert, I was ready to call him and the Secretary of State back when the following telegram from General Grant to the Secretary of War was presented to me:
OFFICE UNITED STATES MILITARY TELEGRAPH, WAR DEPARTMENT.
OFFICE UNITED STATES MILITARY TELEGRAPH, WAR DEPARTMENT.
The following telegram received at Washington 4.35 A.M., February 2, 1865, from City Point, Va., February 1, 10.30 P.M., 1865:
The following telegram was received in Washington at 4:35 A.M. on February 2, 1865, from City Point, Va., dated February 1 at 10:30 P.M., 1865:
"HON. EDWIN M. STANTON, "Secretary of War:
"HON. EDWIN M. STANTON, "Secretary of War:
"Now that the interview between Major Eckert, under his written instructions, and Mr. Stephens and party has ended, I will state confidentially, but not officially to become a matter of record, that I am convinced upon conversation with Messrs. Stephens and Hunter that their intentions are good and their desire sincere to restore peace and union. I have not felt myself at liberty to express even views of my own or to account for my reticency. This has placed me in an awkward position, which I could have avoided by not seeing them in the first instance. I fear now their going back without any expression from anyone in authority will have a bad influence. At the same time, I recognize the difficulties in the way of receiving these informal commissioners at this time, and do not know what to recommend. I am sorry, however, that Mr. Lincoln can not have an interview with the two named in this despatch, if not all three now within our lines. Their letter to me was all that the President's instructions contemplated to secure their safe conduct if they had used the same language to Major Eckert.
Now that Major Eckert has finished his interview with Mr. Stephens and his group, according to his written instructions, I want to share confidentially, but not officially for the record, that I truly believe after talking with Messrs. Stephens and Hunter that their intentions are genuine and they sincerely want to restore peace and unity. I haven’t felt able to share my own views or explain my hesitance, which has put me in an uncomfortable position—one I could have avoided by not meeting with them at all. I’m concerned that if they leave without any response from someone in authority, it will create a negative impact. At the same time, I understand the challenges of receiving these informal commissioners right now and I'm unsure what to suggest. I do regret that Mr. Lincoln cannot meet with the two mentioned in this dispatch, if not all three currently within our lines. Their letter to me was exactly what the President's instructions required to ensure their safe passage if they had communicated the same thing to Major Eckert.
"U.S. GRANT "Lieutenant-General."
"U.S. Grant: Lieutenant General."
This despatch of General Grant changed my purpose, and accordingly I telegraphed him and the Secretary of State, respectively, as follows:
This message from General Grant changed my plans, so I sent a telegram to him and the Secretary of State, respectively, as follows:
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., February 2, 1865. (Sent at 9 A.M.)
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., February 2, 1865. (Sent at 9 A.M.)
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
LT. GEN. GRANT, City Point, VA:
Say to the gentlemen I will meet them personally at Fortress Monroe as soon as I can get there.
Tell the guys I’ll meet them in person at Fortress Monroe as soon as I can get there.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., February 2, 1865. (Sent at 9 A.M.)
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., February 2, 1865. (Sent at 9 A.M.)
HON. WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Fortress Monroe, Va.:
HON. WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Fortress Monroe, VA:
Induced by a despatch from General Grant, I join you at Fort Monroe as soon as I can come.
Induced by a message from General Grant, I'll join you at Fort Monroe as soon as I can.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
Before starting, the following despatch was shown me. I proceeded, nevertheless:
Before starting, I was shown the following message. I continued, though:
OFFICE UNITED STATES MILITARY TELEGRAPH, WAR DEPARTMENT.
OFFICE UNITED STATES MILITARY TELEGRAPH, WAR DEPARTMENT.
The following telegram received at Washington, February 2, 1865, from City Point, Va., 9 A.M., February 2, 1865:
The following telegram received in Washington, February 2, 1865, from City Point, VA, 9 A.M., February 2, 1865:
"HON. WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State, Fort Monroe:
"HON. WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State, Fort Monroe:"
"The gentlemen here have accepted the proposed terms, and will leave for Fort Monroe at 9.30 A.M.
"The gentlemen here have agreed to the proposed terms and will depart for Fort Monroe at 9:30 A.M."
"U. S. GRANT, Lieutenant-General."
"U.S. Grant, Lieutenant General."
(Copy to HON. Edwin M. Stanton, Secretary of War, Washington.)
(Copy to Hon. Edwin M. Stanton, Secretary of War, Washington.)
On the night of the 2nd I reached Hampton Roads, found the Secretary of State and Major Eckert on a steamer anchored offshore, and learned of them that the Richmond gentlemen were on another steamer also anchored offshore, in the Roads, and that the Secretary of State had not yet seen or communicated with them. I ascertained that Major Eckert had literally complied with his instructions, and I saw for the first time the answer of the Richmond gentlemen to him, which in his despatch to me of the 1st he characterizes as "not satisfactory." That answer is as follows, to wit:
On the night of the 2nd, I arrived at Hampton Roads and found the Secretary of State and Major Eckert on a steamer anchored offshore. They informed me that the gentlemen from Richmond were on another steamer, also anchored offshore in the Roads, and that the Secretary of State had not yet met or communicated with them. I found out that Major Eckert had strictly followed his instructions, and I saw for the first time the response from the Richmond gentlemen to him, which he referred to in his dispatch to me on the 1st as "not satisfactory." Their response is as follows:
CITY POINT, VA., February 1, 1865. THOMAS T. ECKERT, Major and Aid-de-Camp. MAJOR:-Your note, delivered by yourself this day, has been considered. In reply we have to say that we were furnished with a copy of the letter of President Lincoln to Francis P. Blair, Esq., of the 18th of January ultimo, another copy of which is appended to your note. Our instructions are contained in a letter of which the following is a copy:
CITY POINT, VA., February 1, 1865. THOMAS T. ECKERT, Major and Aid-de-Camp. MAJOR: Your note, which you delivered yourself today, has been reviewed. In response, we want to say that we received a copy of President Lincoln's letter to Francis P. Blair, Esq., dated January 18 of last month, and another copy is included with your note. Our instructions are outlined in a letter, of which the following is a copy:
"RICHMOND, January 28, 1865. "In conformity with the letter of Mr. Lincoln, of which the foregoing is a copy, you are to proceed to Washington City for informal conference with him upon the issues involved in the existing war, and for the purpose of securing peace to the two countries. "With great respect, your obedient servant, "JEFFERSON DAVIS."
"RICHMOND, January 28, 1865. "Following Mr. Lincoln's letter, of which this is a copy, you are to go to Washington City for an informal meeting with him regarding the issues related to the ongoing war, and to work towards establishing peace between the two countries. "With great respect, your obedient servant, "JEFFERSON DAVIS."
The substantial object to be obtained by the informal conference is to ascertain upon what terms the existing war can be terminated honorably.
The main goal of the informal conference is to figure out the terms for ending the current war in a way that is honorable.
Our instructions contemplate a personal interview between President Lincoln and ourselves at Washington City, but with this explanation we are ready to meet any person or persons that President Lincoln may appoint at such place as he may designate.
Our instructions expect a personal interview between President Lincoln and us in Washington, but with this clarification, we are open to meeting any person or people that President Lincoln may choose at any location he designates.
Our earnest desire is that a just and honorable peace may be agreed upon, and we are prepared to receive or to submit propositions which may possibly lead to the attainment of that end.
We sincerely want to reach a fair and honorable peace, and we are ready to consider or present suggestions that might help us achieve that goal.
Very respectfully, yours,
Respectfully yours,
ALEXANDER H. STEPHENS. R. M. T. HUNTER. JOHN A. CAMPBELL.
ALEXANDER H. STEPHENS. R. M. T. HUNTER. JOHN A. CAMPBELL.
A note of these gentlemen, subsequently addressed to General Grant, has already been given in Major Eckert's despatch of the 1st instant.
A letter from these gentlemen, later sent to General Grant, has already been included in Major Eckert's report from the 1st.
I also here saw, for the first time, the following note, addressed by the Richmond gentlemen to Major Eckert:
I also saw, for the first time, the following note addressed by the Richmond gentlemen to Major Eckert:
CITY POINT, VA., February 2, 1865. THOMAS T. ECKERT, Major and Aid-de-Camp. MAJOR:—In reply to your verbal statement that your instructions did not allow you to alter the conditions upon which a passport could be given to us, we say that we are willing to proceed to Fortress Monroe and there to have an informal conference with any person or persons that President Lincoln may appoint on the basis of his letter to Francis P. Blair of the 18th of January ultimo, or upon any other terms or conditions that he may hereafter propose not inconsistent with the essential principles of self-government and popular rights, upon which our institutions are founded.
CITY POINT, VA., February 2, 1865. THOMAS T. ECKERT, Major and Aid-de-Camp. MAJOR:—In response to your verbal statement that your instructions prevent you from changing the conditions for granting us a passport, we would like to express that we are ready to head to Fortress Monroe and hold an informal meeting with anyone President Lincoln designates based on his letter to Francis P. Blair dated January 18 last month, or on any other terms or conditions he might propose in the future, as long as they align with the essential principles of self-government and popular rights that our institutions are built upon.
It is our earnest wish to ascertain, after a free interchange of ideas and information, upon what principles and terms, if any, a just and honorable peace can be established without the further effusion of blood, and to contribute our utmost efforts to accomplish such a result.
It is our sincere desire to find out, after an open exchange of thoughts and information, on what principles and terms, if any, a fair and honorable peace can be achieved without more bloodshed, and to do everything we can to make that happen.
We think it better to add that in accepting your passport we are not to be understood as committing ourselves to anything but to carry to this informal conference the views and feelings above expressed.
We believe it’s important to clarify that by accepting your passport, we’re not committing to anything other than presenting the thoughts and feelings stated above at this informal conference.
Very respectfully, yours, etc.,
Sincerely, yours, etc.
ALEXANDER H. STEPHENS, J. A. CAMPBELL, R. M. T. HUNTER.
ALEXANDER H. STEPHENS, J. A. CAMPBELL, R. M. T. HUNTER.
Note.-The above communication was delivered to me at Fort Monroe at 4.30 P.M. February 2 by Lieutenant-Colonel Babcock, of General Grant's staff.
Note.-The above communication was given to me at Fort Monroe at 4:30 PM on February 2 by Lieutenant-Colonel Babcock, from General Grant's staff.
THOMAS T. ECKERT Major and Aid-de-Camp.
THOMAS T. ECKERT Major and Aide-de-Camp.
On the morning of the third the three gentlemen, Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell, came aboard of our steamer and had an interview with the Secretary of State and myself of several hours' duration. No question of preliminaries to the meeting was then and there made or mentioned; no other person was present; no papers were exchanged or produced; and it was in advance agreed that the conversation was to be informal and verbal merely. On our part the whole substance of the instructions to the Secretary of State hereinbefore recited was stated and insisted upon, and nothing was said inconsistent therewith; while by the other party it was not said that in any event or on any condition they ever would consent to reunion, and yet they equally omitted to declare that they never would consent. They seemed to desire a postponement of that question and the adoption of some other course first, which, as some of them seemed to argue, might or might not lead to reunion, but which course we thought would amount to an indefinite postponement. The conference ended without result.
On the morning of the third, the three gentlemen, Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell, came aboard our steamer and had a meeting with the Secretary of State and me that lasted several hours. No preliminary matters were brought up or discussed; nobody else was present; no documents were shared or shown; and it was previously agreed that the conversation would be informal and just verbal. From our side, we clearly stated and emphasized the entire content of the instructions to the Secretary of State mentioned earlier, and nothing contradictory was said. Meanwhile, the other party didn’t say that they would ever agree to reunification under any circumstances, but they also didn’t state that they would never agree. They seemed to want to postpone that question and explore some other options first, which, as some of them suggested, might or might not lead to reunification, but we believed that this approach would essentially mean an indefinite delay. The conference ended without any conclusions.
The foregoing, containing, as is believed, all the information sought is respectfully submitted.
The above, which is believed to contain all the requested information, is respectfully submitted.
MESSAGE TO THE SENATE. WASHINGTON, February 10, 1865
To THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES:
In answer to the resolution of the Senate of the eighth instant, requesting information concerning recent conversations or communications with insurgents, under executive sanction, I transmit a report from the Secretary of State, to whom the resolution was referred.
In response to the Senate's resolution from the eighth of this month, requesting information about recent talks or communications with insurgents, authorized by the executive, I am sending a report from the Secretary of State, to whom the resolution was directed.
A. LINCOLN. TO THE PRESIDENT:
A. LINCOLN. TO THE PRESIDENT:
The Secretary of State, to whom was referred a resolution of the Senate of the 8th instant, requesting "the President of the United States, if, in his opinion, not incompatible with the public interests, to furnish to the Senate any information in his possession concerning recent conversations or communications with certain rebels, said to have taken place under executive sanction, including communications with the rebel Jefferson Davis, and any correspondence relating thereto," has the honor to report that the Senate may properly be referred to a special message of the President bearing upon the subject of the resolution, and transmitted to the House this day. Appended to this report is a copy of an instruction which has been addressed to Charles Francis Adams, Esq., envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary of the United States at London, and which is the only correspondence found in this department touching the subject referred to in the resolution.
The Secretary of State, who received a resolution from the Senate dated the 8th of this month, requesting "the President of the United States, if he believes it won't hurt the public interest, to provide the Senate with any information he has regarding recent discussions or communications with certain rebels, said to have occurred with executive approval, including any exchanges with the rebel Jefferson Davis, and any related correspondence," is pleased to report that the Senate may properly refer to a special message from the President addressing the subject of the resolution, which was sent to the House today. Included in this report is a copy of an instruction that was sent to Charles Francis Adams, Esq., the extraordinary envoy and minister plenipotentiary of the United States in London, which is the only correspondence found in this department related to the matter mentioned in the resolution.
Respectfully submitted,
Respectfully submitted,
WILLIAM H. SEWARD.
WILLIAM H. SEWARD.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, WASHINGTON, February 10, 1865.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, WASHINGTON, February 10, 1865.
MR. SEWARD TO MR. ADAMS.
(Extract.) No. 1258.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, WASHINGTON, February 7,1865
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, WASHINGTON, February 7, 1865
On the morning of the 3d, the President, attended by the Secretary, received Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell on board the United States steam transport River Queen in Hampton Roads. The conference was altogether informal. There was no attendance of secretaries, clerks, or other witnesses. Nothing was written or read. The conversation, although earnest and free, was calm, and courteous, and kind on both sides. The Richmond party approached the discussion rather indirectly, and at no time did they either make categorical demands, or tender formal stipulations or absolute refusals. Nevertheless, during the conference, which lasted four hours, the several points at issue between the Government and the insurgents were distinctly raised, and discussed fully, intelligently, and in an amicable spirit. What the insurgent party seemed chiefly to favor was a postponement of the question of separation, upon which the war is waged, and a mutual direction of efforts of the Government, as well as those of the insurgents, to some extrinsic policy or scheme for a season during which passions might be expected to subside, and the armies be reduced, and trade and intercourse between the people of both sections resumed. It was suggested by them that through such postponement we might now have immediate peace, with some not very certain prospect of an ultimate satisfactory adjustment of political relations between this Government and the States, section, or people now engaged in conflict with it.
On the morning of the 3rd, the President, accompanied by the Secretary, met with Messrs. Stephens, Hunter, and Campbell aboard the United States steam transport River Queen in Hampton Roads. The meeting was completely informal. There were no secretaries, clerks, or other witnesses present. Nothing was written down or read aloud. The conversation, while serious and open, was calm, courteous, and kind on both sides. The Richmond representatives approached the discussion somewhat indirectly, and at no point did they make strict demands, propose formal agreements, or state outright refusals. However, during the four-hour conference, several key issues between the Government and the insurgents were clearly raised and discussed thoroughly, intelligently, and amicably. What the insurgent group seemed to mainly support was delaying the question of separation, which is the reason for the war, and redirecting the efforts of both the Government and the insurgents toward some external policy or plan for a while, during which emotions might cool down, armies could be reduced, and trade and communication between the people of both regions could resume. They suggested that by postponing this issue, we might achieve immediate peace with some uncertain hope for a satisfactory eventual resolution of political relations between the Government and the states, regions, or people currently in conflict.
This suggestion, though deliberately considered, was nevertheless regarded by the President as one of armistice or truce, and he announced that we can agree to no cessation or suspension of hostilities, except on the basis of the disbandment of the insurgent forces, and the restoration of the national authority throughout all the States in the Union. Collaterally, and in subordination to the proposition which was thus announced, the antislavery policy of the United States was reviewed in all its bearings, and the President announced that he must not be expected to depart from the positions he had heretofore assumed in his proclamation of emancipation and other documents, as these positions were reiterated in his last annual message. It was further declared by the President that the complete restoration of the national authority was an indispensable condition of any assent on our part to whatever form of peace might be proposed. The President assured the other party that, while he must adhere to these positions, he would be prepared, so far as power is lodged with the Executive, to exercise liberality. His power, however, is limited by the Constitution; and when peace should be made, Congress must necessarily act in regard to appropriations of money and to the admission of representatives from the insurrectionary States. The Richmond party were then informed that Congress had, on the 31st ultimo, adopted by a constitutional majority a joint resolution submitting to the several States the proposition to abolish slavery throughout the Union, and that there is every reason to expect that it will be soon accepted by three fourths of the States, so as to become a part of the national organic law.
This suggestion, while carefully considered, was still seen by the President as a proposal for a ceasefire or truce. He announced that we cannot agree to any halt or pause in hostilities unless it includes disbanding the rebel forces and restoring national authority across all states in the Union. In addition to this proposal, the President reviewed the antislavery policy of the United States in all its aspects and stated that he shouldn't be expected to change his stance from previous proclamations of emancipation and other documents, as these positions were reiterated in his most recent annual message. The President further declared that the complete restoration of national authority was essential for any agreement on peace that might be proposed. He assured the other party that, while he must stick to these positions, he would be ready, as far as his authority allows, to be generous. However, his power is limited by the Constitution, and once peace is achieved, Congress will need to act regarding funding and the admission of representatives from the rebel states. The Richmond party was then informed that Congress had, on the 31st of last month, passed a joint resolution with a constitutional majority to present to the various states the proposition to abolish slavery throughout the Union, and that there is every reason to believe it will soon be accepted by three-fourths of the states, making it part of the national organic law.
The conference came to an end by mutual acquiescence, without producing an agreement of views upon the several matters discussed, or any of them. Nevertheless, it is perhaps of some importance that we have been able to submit our opinions and views directly to prominent insurgents, and to hear them in answer in a courteous and not unfriendly manner.
The conference concluded by mutual agreement, without reaching a consensus on the various topics discussed. However, it is probably significant that we were able to express our opinions directly to key insurgents and hear their responses in a polite and somewhat friendly way.
I am, sir, your obedient servant,
I am, sir, your respectful servant,
TO ADMIRAL DAVID D. PORTER.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, February 10, 1865
REAR-ADMIRAL DAVID D. PORTER, Commanding North Atlantic Squadron, Hampton Roads, Va.
REAR-ADMIRAL DAVID D. PORTER, Commanding North Atlantic Squadron, Hampton Roads, VA.
SIR:—It is made my agreeable duty to enclose herewith the joint resolution approved 24th January, 1865, tendering the thanks of Congress to yourself, the officers and men under your command for their gallantry and good conduct in the capture of Fort Fisher, and through you to all who participated in that brilliant and decisive victory under your command.
SIR:—I am pleased to enclose the joint resolution approved on January 24, 1865, expressing Congress's gratitude to you, the officers, and the soldiers under your command for your bravery and excellent conduct in capturing Fort Fisher, and through you to everyone who took part in that impressive and decisive victory under your leadership.
Very respectfully,
Respectfully,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL S. POPE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 12, 1865
MAJOR-GENERAL POPE, St. Louis, Missouri:
MAJOR-GENERAL POPE, St. Louis, MO:
I understand that provost-marshals in different parts of Missouri are assuming to decide that the conditions of bonds are forfeited, and therefore are seizing and selling property to pay damages. This, if true, is both outrageous and ridiculous. Do not allow it. The courts, and not provost-marshals, are to decide such questions unless when military necessity makes an exception. Also excuse John Eaton, of Clay County, and Wesley Martin, of Platte, from being sent South, and let them go East if anywhere.
I understand that provost-marshals in various parts of Missouri are taking it upon themselves to decide that bond conditions have been violated, and are therefore seizing and selling property to pay for damages. If this is true, it's both outrageous and ridiculous. Don’t let this happen. Courts, not provost-marshals, should decide such matters unless military necessity provides an exception. Also, please excuse John Eaton from Clay County and Wesley Martin from Platte from being sent South, and let them go East if they need to go anywhere.
TO THE COMMANDING OFFICERS IN WEST TENNESSEE
WASHINGTON, February 13, 1865.
TO THE MILITARY OFFICERS COMMANDING IN WEST TENNESSEE:
TO THE MILITARY OFFICERS IN CHARGE IN WEST TENNESSEE:
While I cannot order as within requested, allow me to say that it is my wish for you to relieve the people from all burdens, harassments, and oppressions, so far as is possible consistently with your military necessities; that the object of the war being to restore and maintain the blessings of peace and good government, I desire you to help, and not hinder, every advance in that direction.
While I can't give specific orders as requested, I want to express my wish for you to help relieve the people of all their burdens, harassment, and oppression, as much as possible while still considering your military needs. Since the goal of the war is to restore and maintain the benefits of peace and good governance, I urge you to support, not obstruct, every effort in that direction.
Of your military necessities you must judge and execute, but please do so in the spirit and with the purpose above indicated.
You need to evaluate and carry out your military requirements, but please do so in the spirit and with the intent mentioned above.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL J. POPE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 14, 1865.
MAJOR-GENERAL POPE, St. Louis, Missouri:
MAJOR-GENERAL POPE, St. Louis, MO:
Yours of yesterday about provost-marshal system received. As part of the same subject, let me say I am now pressed in regard to a pending assessment in St. Louis County. Please examine and satisfy yourself whether this assessment should proceed or be abandoned; and if you decide that it is to proceed, please examine as to the propriety of its application to a gentleman by the name of Charles McLaran.
I got your message yesterday about the provost-marshal system. Regarding that topic, I want to mention that I'm currently dealing with a pending assessment in St. Louis County. Please look into whether this assessment should go forward or be dropped; and if you decide it should proceed, please check if it’s appropriate to apply it to a gentleman named Charles McLaran.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL POPE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON February 15, 1865.
MAJOR-GENERAL POPE, St. Louis, Missouri:
MAJ. GEN. POPE, St. Louis, MO:
Please ascertain whether General Fisk's administration is as good as it might be, and answer me.
Please find out if General Fisk's administration is as good as it could be, and let me know.
PROCLAMATION CONVENING THE SENATE IN EXTRA SESSION,
FEBRUARY 17, 1865.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
A Proclamation
A Declaration
Whereas objects of interest to the United States require that the Senate should be convened at twelve o'clock on the fourth of March next to receive and act upon such communications as may be made to it on the part of the Executive;
Whereas issues important to the United States necessitate that the Senate meets at noon on March fourth to receive and act on any communications from the Executive;
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, have considered it to be my duty to issue this, my proclamation, declaring that an extraordinary occasion requires the Senate of the United States to convene for the transaction of business at the Capitol, in the city of Washington, on the fourth day of March next, at twelve o'clock at noon on that day, of which all who shall at that time be entitled to act as members of that body are hereby required to take notice.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, feel it is my duty to issue this proclamation, stating that a special occasion requires the Senate of the United States to meet for business at the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on March fourth of next year, at twelve o'clock noon on that day, and all those entitled to serve as members of that body are hereby required to take notice.
Given under my hand and the seal of the United States, at Washington...............
Given under my hand and the seal of the United States, at Washington...............
A. LINCOLN. By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
A. LINCOLN. By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
TELEGRAM TO OFFICER IN COMMAND AT HARPER'S FERRY.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 17, 1865
OFFICER IN COMMAND AT HARPER'S FERRY:
OFFICER IN COMMAND AT HARPER'S FERRY:
Chaplain Fitzgibbon yesterday sent me a despatch invoking Clemency for Jackson, Stewart, and Randall, who are to be shot to-day. The despatch is so vague that there is no means here of ascertaining whether or not the execution of sentence of one or more of them may not already have been ordered. If not suspend execution of sentence m their cases until further orders and forward records of trials for examination.
Chaplain Fitzgibbon sent me a message yesterday requesting clemency for Jackson, Stewart, and Randall, who are scheduled to be shot today. The message is so unclear that there's no way to determine whether the execution of any or all of them might have already been ordered. If not, please hold off on their execution until further notice and send over the trial records for review.
A. LINCOLN
A. Lincoln
MAJOR ECKERT: Please send above telegram JNO. G. NICOLAY.
MAJOR ECKERT: Please send the above telegram to JNO. G. NICOLAY.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT.
WASHINGTON, D. C., February 24, 1865
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Virginia:
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, VA:
I am in a little perplexity. I was induced to authorize a gentleman to bring Roger A. Pryor here with a view of effecting an exchange of him; but since then I have seen a despatch of yours showing that you specially object to his exchange. Meantime he has reached here and reported to me. It is an ungracious thing for me to send him back to prison, and yet inadmissible for him to remain here long. Cannot you help me out with it? I can conceive that there may be difference to you in days, and I can keep him a few days to accommodate on that point. I have not heard of my son's reaching you.
I’m feeling a bit confused. I agreed to let a guy bring Roger A. Pryor here to arrange his exchange, but then I saw a message from you saying you specifically don’t want to exchange him. In the meantime, he’s arrived and reported to me. It would be unfair to send him back to prison, yet it’s not suitable for him to stay here for long. Can you help me with this? I understand there might be some timing issues for you, and I can keep him here for a few extra days to work that out. I haven’t heard if my son has arrived with you.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL POPE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, February 24, 1865
MAJOR-GENERAL POPE, Saint Louis, Mo.:
MAJOR-GENERAL POPE, St. Louis, MO:
Please inquire and report to me whether there is any propriety of longer keeping in Gratiott Street Prison a man said to be there by the name of Riley Whiting.
Please check and let me know if it's appropriate to keep a man named Riley Whiting in Gratiott Street Prison any longer.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, February 25, 1865
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Virginia:
General Sheridan's despatch to you, of to-day, in which he says he "will be off on Monday," and that he "will leave behind about two thousand men," causes the Secretary of War and myself considerable anxiety. Have you well considered whether you do not again leave open the Shenandoah Valley entrance to Maryland and Pennsylvania, or, at least, to the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad?
General Sheridan's message to you today, where he mentions he "will be off on Monday" and that he "will leave behind about two thousand men," gives the Secretary of War and me a lot of concern. Have you fully thought about whether you might be leaving the entrance to the Shenandoah Valley open again for Maryland and Pennsylvania, or at least for the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad?
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., February 27, 1865.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Virginia:
Subsequent reflection, conference with General Halleck, your despatch, and one from General Sheridan, have relieved my anxiety; and so I beg that you will dismiss any concern you may have on my account, in the matter of my last despatch.
After thinking it over, talking with General Halleck, reading your message, and one from General Sheridan, I feel much better; so please don’t worry about me regarding my last message.
TO T. W. CONWAY.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C., March 1, 1865.
MR. THOMAS W. CONWAY, General Superintendent Freedmen, Department of the Gulf.
MR. THOMAS W. CONWAY, General Superintendent of Freedmen, Department of the Gulf.
SIR:—Your statement to Major-General Hurlbut of the condition of the freedmen of your department, and of your success in the work of their moral and physical elevation, has reached me and given me much pleasure.
SIR:—I received your report to Major-General Hurlbut about the situation of the freedmen in your department and your success in improving their moral and physical wellbeing, and it has brought me great joy.
That we shall be entirely successful in our efforts I firmly believe.
I truly believe that we will be completely successful in our efforts.
The blessing of God and the efforts of good and faithful men will bring us an earlier and happier consummation than the most sanguine friends of the freedmen could reasonably expect.
The blessing of God and the efforts of good and loyal people will lead us to a quicker and more joyful outcome than even the most optimistic supporters of the freedmen could have reasonably anticipated.
Yours,
Best,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., March 2, 1865.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.:
You have not sent contents of Richmond papers for Tuesday or Wednesday. Did you not receive them? If not, does it indicate anything?
You haven't sent the Richmond papers for Tuesday or Wednesday. Did you not get them? If not, does that mean something?
TELEGRAM FROM SECRETARY STANTON TO GENERAL GRANT.
WASHINGTON, March 3, 1865. 12 PM.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT:
LT. GEN. GRANT:
The President directs me to say to you that he wishes you to have no conference with General Lee unless it be for the capitulation of General Lee's army, or on some minor and purely military matter. He instructs me to say that you are not to decide, discuss, or confer upon any political question. Such questions the President holds in his own hands, and will submit them to no military conferences or conventions. Meantime you are to press to the utmost your military advantages.
The President wants me to tell you that you shouldn’t meet with General Lee unless it’s to discuss the surrender of his army or some minor military issue. He instructs me to make it clear that you are not allowed to decide, talk about, or engage in any political discussions. The President retains those matters for himself and won’t bring them into any military conferences or meetings. In the meantime, you should make the most of your military advantages.
EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War.
SECOND INAUGURAL ADDRESS, MARCH 4, 1865.
FELLOW-COUNTRYMEN:—At this second appearing to take the oath of the presidential office there is less occasion for an extended address than there was at the first. Then a statement somewhat in detail of a course to be pursued seemed fitting and proper. Now, at the expiration of four years, during which public declarations have been constantly called forth on every point and phase of the great contest which still absorbs the attention and engrosses the energies of the nation, little that is new could be presented. The progress of our arms, upon which all else chiefly depends, is as well known to the public as to myself, and it is, I trust, reasonably satisfactory and encouraging to all. With high hope for the future, no prediction in regard to it is ventured.
FELLOW COUNTRYMEN:—As I take the presidential oath for the second time, there's less need for a lengthy speech than there was during my first term. Back then, it felt right to outline in detail the path we would take. Now, after four years, during which I've made public statements on every aspect of the significant struggle that still captures the nation's focus and energy, there's not much new to share. The progress of our military efforts, which is crucial to everything else, is as well known to the public as it is to me, and I trust it's reasonably satisfactory and encouraging for all. With great hope for the future, I'm not making any predictions about it.
On the occasion corresponding to this four years ago all thoughts were anxiously directed to an impending civil war. All dreaded it, all sought to avert it. While the inaugural address was being delivered from this place, devoted altogether to saving the Union without war, insurgent agents were in the city seeking to destroy it without war seeking to dissolve the Union and divide effects by negotiation. Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish, and the war came.
Four years ago, everyone was anxiously focused on the threat of a civil war. Everyone feared it and tried to prevent it. While the inaugural address was being given here, aimed completely at preserving the Union without conflict, rebellious agents were in the city trying to undermine it without fighting, hoping to dissolve the Union and divide resources through negotiation. Both sides opposed war, but one was willing to go to war to ensure the nation continued, while the other would accept war rather than see it fail, and thus, the war began.
One eighth of the whole population was colored slaves, not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it. These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. To strengthen, perpetuate, and extend this interest was the object for which the insurgents would rend the Union even by war, while the Government claimed no right to do more than to restrict the territorial enlargement of it. Neither party expected for the war the magnitude or the duration which it has already attained. Neither anticipated that the cause of the conflict might cease with or even before the conflict itself should cease. Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men's faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. "Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh." If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman's two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said, "The judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."
One-eighth of the entire population consisted of enslaved people, concentrated mainly in the southern part of the country. These enslaved individuals represented a unique and significant interest. Everyone understood that this interest was somehow the cause of the war. The insurgents aimed to strengthen, maintain, and expand this interest, even through war if necessary, while the Government claimed it only sought to limit its geographic spread. Neither side anticipated the scale or duration of the conflict that has unfolded. Neither expected that the underlying issues might end before or even with the end of the war itself. Each side hoped for an easier victory and a less profound outcome. Both groups read the same Bible and prayed to the same God, each seeking His help against the other. It may seem odd that anyone would ask a just God to help them earn their livelihood from the hard work of others, but let's not judge, so we are not judged. The prayers of both sides could not be fully answered. Neither side's prayers have been completely fulfilled. The Almighty has His purpose. "Woe to the world because of offenses; for such things must come, but woe to the person by whom the offense comes." If we assume that American slavery is one of those offenses that, in God's plan, must arise but which He now seeks to end, and that He has given both the North and South this terrible war as a consequence for those who caused the offense, can we see this as a deviation from the divine qualities attributed to Him by believers? We hope earnestly and pray fervently that this terrible scourge of war will soon come to an end. Yet, if God decides that it should continue until all the wealth accumulated from the enslaved people's two hundred and fifty years of unpaid labor is lost, and until every drop of blood shed by the whip is paid for by another drop drawn by the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, then it must still be said, "The judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether."
With malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds, to care for him who shall have borne the battle and for his widow and his orphan, to do all which may achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.
With no ill will toward anyone, with kindness for all, and with determination to do what is right as we understand it, let’s keep working to complete the task we have, to heal the nation's wounds, to support those who have fought and their families, and to do everything we can to achieve and maintain a fair and lasting peace among ourselves and with all nations.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL JOHN POPE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 7, 1865
MAJOR-GENERAL POPE, St. Louis, Missouri:
MAJOR-GENERAL POPE, St. Louis, MO:
Please state briefly, by telegraph, what you concluded about the assessments in St. Louis County. Early in the war one Samuel B. Churchill was sent from St. Louis to Louisville, where I have quite satisfactory evidence that he has not misbehaved. Still I am told his property at St. Louis is subjected to the assessment, which I think it ought not to be. Still I wish to know what you think.
Please briefly state, via telegraph, what you concluded about the assessments in St. Louis County. Early in the war, a man named Samuel B. Churchill was sent from St. Louis to Louisville, where I have solid evidence that he has behaved well. However, I’ve been informed that his property in St. Louis is still being assessed, which I don’t believe it should be. I would like to know your thoughts on this.
TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. WASHINGTON, D. C., March 8, 1865.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va:
Your two despatches to the Secretary of War, one relating to supplies for the enemy going by the Blackwater, and the other to General Singleton and Judge Hughes, have been laid before me by him. As to Singleton and Hughes, I think they are not in Richmond by any authority, unless it be from you. I remember nothing from me which could aid them in getting there, except a letter to you, as follows, to wit:
Your two messages to the Secretary of War, one about supplies for the enemy moving through the Blackwater, and the other concerning General Singleton and Judge Hughes, have been presented to me by him. Regarding Singleton and Hughes, I believe they are not in Richmond with any official permission, except from you. I don’t recall anything from me that could help them get there, except for a letter to you, as follows:
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON CITY, February 7, 1865. LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.: General Singleton, who bears you this, claims that he already has arrangements made, if you consent, to bring a large amount of Southern produce through your lines. For its bearing on our finances, I would be glad for this to be done, if it can be, without injuriously disturbing your military operations, or supplying the enemy. I wish you to be judge and master on these points. Please see and hear him fully, and decide whether anything, and, if anything, what, can be done in the premises. Yours truly,
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON CITY, February 7, 1865. LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, City Point, Va.: General Singleton, who is delivering this message to you, claims that he has already made plans, if you agree, to bring a large amount of Southern produce through your lines. Given its impact on our finances, I would be pleased for this to happen, as long as it doesn’t negatively affect your military operations or supply the enemy. I want you to be the judge and decision-maker on these matters. Please meet with him, listen to what he has to say, and decide if anything can be done, and if so, what can be done. Yours truly,
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
I believe I gave Hughes a card putting him with Singleton on the same letter. However this may be, I now authorize you to get Singleton and Hughes away from Richmond, if you choose, and can. I also authorize you, by an order, or in what form you choose, to suspend all operations on the Treasury trade permits, in all places southeastward of the Alleghenies. If you make such order, notify me of it, giving a copy, so that I can give corresponding direction to the Navy.
I think I gave Hughes a card that included him with Singleton on the same letter. Regardless, I now give you the go-ahead to remove Singleton and Hughes from Richmond if you want to and are able to. I also authorize you, in whatever form you prefer, to pause all operations on the Treasury trade permits in all areas southeast of the Alleghenies. If you issue such an order, please inform me with a copy so I can provide the Navy with the necessary instructions.
PROCLAMATION OFFERING PARDON TO DESERTERS,
MARCH 11, 1865
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A Proclamation
A Statement
Whereas, the twenty-first section of the act of Congress, approved on the 3d instant, entitled "An Act to amend the several acts heretofore passed to provide for the enrolling and calling out the national forces and for other purposes," requires that in addition to the other lawful penalties of the crime of desertion from the military or naval service, all persons who have deserted the military or naval service of the United States who shall not return to said service or report themselves to a provost-marshal within sixty days after the proclamation hereinafter mentioned, shall be deemed and taken to have voluntarily relinquished and forfeited their citizenship and their right to become citizens, and such deserters shall be forever incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under the United States, or of exercising any rights of citizens thereof; and all persons who shall hereafter desert the military or naval service, and all persons who, being duly enrolled, shall depart the jurisdiction of the district in which they are enrolled, or go beyond the limits of the United States with intent to avoid any draft into the military or naval service duly ordered, shall be liable to the penalties of this section; and the President is hereby authorized and required forthwith, on the passage of this act, to issue his proclamation setting forth the provisions of this section, in which proclamation the President is requested to notify all deserters returning within sixty days as aforesaid that they shall be pardoned on condition of returning to their regiments and companies, or to such other organizations as they may be assigned to, until they shall have served for a period of time equal to their original term of enlistment:
Whereas, the twenty-first section of the act of Congress, approved on the 3rd of this month, titled "An Act to amend the several acts previously passed to provide for enrolling and calling out the national forces and for other purposes," states that in addition to the other legal penalties for the crime of desertion from military or naval service, anyone who has deserted from the military or naval service of the United States and does not return to that service or report to a provost-marshal within sixty days after the proclamation mentioned later, shall be considered to have voluntarily given up and forfeited their citizenship and their right to become citizens. Such deserters will forever be prohibited from holding any position of trust or profit under the United States or from exercising any rights as citizens. Furthermore, anyone who deserts the military or naval service in the future, and anyone who, being properly enrolled, leaves the jurisdiction of the district where they are enrolled or goes beyond the borders of the United States with the intent to avoid a draft into military or naval service that is duly ordered, shall face the penalties outlined in this section. The President is hereby authorized and required to immediately issue a proclamation stating the provisions of this section, in which the President is asked to inform all deserters that if they return within the sixty-day period mentioned, they will be pardoned on the condition that they return to their regiments and companies, or to other organizations they may be assigned to, until they have served for a time equal to their original term of enlistment.
Now, therefore, be it known that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, do issue this my proclamation as required by said act, ordering and requiring all deserters to return to their proper posts; and I do hereby notify them that all deserters who shall within sixty days from the date of this proclamation, viz., on or before the 10th day of May, 1865, return to service or report themselves to a provost-marshal, shall be pardoned on condition that they return to their regiments or companies or to such other organization as they may be assigned to, and serve the remainder of their original terms of enlistment, and in addition thereto a period equal to the time lost by desertion.
Now, therefore, let it be known that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, am issuing this proclamation as required by the law, ordering all deserters to return to their proper posts; and I hereby inform them that any deserters who return to service or report to a provost-marshal within sixty days from the date of this proclamation, specifically by or before May 10, 1865, will be pardoned on the condition that they return to their regiments or companies or to any other organization they may be assigned to, and serve the remainder of their original enlistment term, plus an additional period equal to the time lost due to desertion.
In testimony whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed...............
In witness whereof, I have set my hand and have attached the seal of the United States...
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State
TELEGRAM TO H. T. BLOW.
WASHINGTON, March 13, 1865.
HON. HENRY T. BLOW, Saint Louis, Mo.:
HON. HENRY T. BLOW, St. Louis, MO:
A Miss E. Snodgrass, who was banished from Saint Louis in May,1863, wishes to take the oath and return home. What say you?
A Miss E. Snodgrass, who was expelled from Saint Louis in May 1863, wants to take the oath and go back home. What do you think?
LETTER TO THURLOW WEED,
MARCH 15, 1865.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, D. C.
White House, Washington, D.C.
DEAR Mr. WEED:
Dear Mr. Weed:
Every one likes a compliment. Thank you for yours on my little notification speech and on the recent inaugural address. I expect the latter to wear as well as perhaps better than—anything I have produced; but I believe it is not immediately popular. Men are not flattered by being shown that there has been a difference of purpose between the Almighty and them. To deny it, however, in this case, is to deny that there is a God governing the world. It is a truth which I thought needed to be told, and, as whatever of humiliation there is in it falls most directly on myself, I thought others might afford for me to tell it.
Everyone likes a compliment. Thank you for yours about my brief notification speech and the recent inaugural address. I expect the latter will stand the test of time as well as, if not better than, anything I've done before; however, I believe it's not immediately well-received. People aren't pleased to be reminded that there's been a difference of purpose between the Almighty and themselves. To deny this in this instance is to deny that there's a God overseeing the world. It's a truth I thought needed to be expressed, and since any embarrassment in it falls mostly on me, I felt that others could allow me to say it.
Truly yours,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO COLONEL ROUGH AND OTHERS.
WAR DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON, D. C., March 17, 1865.
COL. R. M. ROUGH AND OTHERS, Chicago, Ill.:
COL. R. M. ROUGH AND OTHERS, Chicago, IL:
Yours received. The best I can do with it is, to refer it to the War Department. The Rock Island case referred to, was my individual enterprise; and it caused so much difficulty in so many ways that I promised to never undertake another.
I got your message. The most I can do is pass it on to the War Department. The Rock Island situation you mentioned was my own personal project, and it created so many challenges in various ways that I vowed never to take on something like that again.
ADDRESS TO AN INDIANA REGIMENT,
MARCH 17, 1865.
FELLOW-CITIZENS:—It will be but a very few words that I shall undertake to say. I was born in Kentucky, raised in Indiana, and lived in Illinois; and now I am here, where it is my business to care equally for the good people of all the States. I am glad to see an Indiana regiment on this day able to present the captured flag to the Governor of Indiana. I am not disposed, in saying this, to make a distinction between the States, for all have done equally well.
FELLOW CITIZENS: I’ll keep this brief. I was born in Kentucky, raised in Indiana, and lived in Illinois; now I’m here to look out for the good people of all the States. I’m happy to see an Indiana regiment today able to present the captured flag to the Governor of Indiana. I don’t mean to draw a distinction between the States, as they’ve all performed equally well.
There are but few views or aspects of this great war upon which I have not said or written something whereby my own opinions might be known. But there is one—the recent attempt of our erring brethren, as they are sometimes called, to employ the negro to fight for them. I have neither written nor made a speech on that subject, because that was their business, not mine, and if I had a wish on the subject, I had not the power to introduce it, or make it effective. The great question with them was whether the negro, being put into the army, will fight for them. I do not know, and therefore cannot decide. They ought to know better than me. I have in my lifetime heard many arguments why the negroes ought to be slaves; but if they fight for those who would keep them in slavery, it will be a better argument than any I have yet heard. He who will fight for that, ought to be a slave. They have concluded, at last, to take one out of four of the slaves and put them in the army, and that one out of the four who will fight to keep the others in slavery, ought to be a slave himself, unless he is killed in a fight. While I have often said that all men ought to be free, yet would I allow those colored persons to be slaves who want to be, and next to them those white people who argue in favor of making other people slaves. I am in favor of giving an appointment to such white men to try it on for these slaves. I will say one thing in regard to the negroes being employed to fight for them. I do know he cannot fight and stay at home and make bread too. And as one is about as important as the other to them, I don't care which they do. I am rather in favor of having them try them as soldiers. They lack one vote of doing that, and I wish I could send my vote over the river so that I might cast it in favor of allowing the negro to fight. But they cannot fight and work both. We must now see the bottom of the enemy's resources. They will stand out as long as they can, and if the negro will fight for them they must allow him to fight. They have drawn upon their last branch of resources, and we can now see the bottom. I am glad to see the end so near at hand. I have said now more than I intended, and will therefore bid you good-by.
There are only a few views or aspects of this great war that I haven't expressed my opinions on, whether through writing or speaking. However, there’s one topic I haven’t addressed—the recent attempt by our misguided brothers, as they are sometimes called, to use Black people as soldiers. I haven’t written or made a speech about that because it’s their business, not mine, and even if I had strong feelings on the matter, I wouldn’t have the power to change things or make any impact. The key question for them was whether Black people, if allowed in the army, would fight for them. I don’t know, and therefore can’t make a judgment. They should know better than I do. Throughout my life, I’ve heard many arguments for why Black people should be enslaved; however, if they fight for those who wish to keep them in bondage, that would be a stronger argument than any I’ve heard so far. Anyone who would fight for that cause should themselves be a slave. They’ve finally decided to take one out of every four slaves and put them in the army, and that one who fights to keep the others in slavery should be a slave himself, unless he is killed in battle. While I have often stated that everyone should be free, I would allow those Black individuals who want to be slaves to be so, along with those white people who argue for making others slaves. I support giving those white men a position to experience what it’s like for these slaves. I do have one opinion about using Black individuals as fighters: I know they can’t both fight and stay at home to make bread. Since both roles are equally important to them, I don’t have a preference for which they choose. I actually favor the idea of having them serve as soldiers. They’re just one vote short of making that happen, and I wish I could send my vote across the river to support allowing Black people to fight. But they can’t do both; they need to see the limits of their enemy’s resources. They will resist as long as they can, and if Black individuals are willing to fight for them, they need to let them do it. They have exhausted their resources, and we can finally see the end in sight. I’m relieved that the conclusion is so near. I’ve said more than I intended, so I will say goodbye now.
PROCLAMATION CONCERNING INDIANS,
MARCH 17, 1865.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas reliable information has been received that hostile Indians, within the limits of the United States, have been furnished with arms and munitions of war by persons dwelling in conterminous foreign territory, and are thereby enabled to prosecute their savage warfare upon the exposed and sparse settlements of the frontier;
Whereas credible information has been received that hostile Native Americans, within the boundaries of the United States, have been supplied with weapons and military equipment by people living in nearby foreign territory, and are therefore able to continue their violent attacks on the vulnerable and scattered settlements of the frontier;
Now, therefore, be it known that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim and direct that all persons detected in that nefarious traffic shall be arrested and tried by court-martial at the nearest military post, and if convicted, shall receive the punishment due to their deserts.
Now, therefore, let it be known that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States of America, hereby proclaim and order that all individuals caught in that illegal trade shall be arrested and tried by court-martial at the closest military post, and if found guilty, shall receive the punishment they deserve.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed...................
In witness whereof, I have set my hand and attached the seal of the United States...
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
ORDER ANNULLING THE SENTENCE
AGAINST BENJAMIN G. SMITH AND FRANKLIN W. SMITH,
MARCH 18, 1865.
MARCH 18, 1865.
I am unwilling for the sentence to stand, and be executed, to any extent in this case. In the absence of a more adequate motive than the evidence discloses, I am wholly unable to believe in the existence of criminal or fraudulent intent on the part of men of such well established good character. If the evidence went as far to establish a guilty profit of one or two hundred thousand dollars, as it does of one or two hundred dollars, the case would, on the question of guilt, bear a far different aspect. That on this contract, involving some twelve hundred thousand dollars, the contractors would plan, and attempt to execute a fraud which, at the most, could profit them only one or two hundred, or even one thousand dollars, is to my mind beyond the power of rational belief. That they did not, in such a case, make far greater gains, proves that they did not, with guilty or fraudulent intent, make at all. The judgment and sentence are disapproved, and declared null, and the defendants are fully discharged.
I cannot allow the sentence to stand and be carried out in this case. Without a stronger motive than what the evidence shows, I can't believe that individuals with such solid reputations had any criminal or fraudulent intent. If the evidence suggested they made a profit of one or two hundred thousand dollars, rather than just one or two hundred, the question of guilt would look very different. The idea that these contractors would plan and try to pull off a fraud on a contract worth about twelve hundred thousand dollars, only hoping to gain one or two hundred or maybe even a thousand dollars, is beyond what I can reasonably accept. The fact that they didn’t gain significantly more indicates they didn’t act with any guilty or fraudulent intent at all. I disapprove of the judgment and sentence, declare them null, and fully release the defendants.
A. LINCOLN March 18, 1865.
A. LINCOLN March 18, 1865.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL J. POPE.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 19, 1865.
MAJOR-GENERAL POPE, St. Louis, Missouri:
Major General Pope, St. Louis, MO:
Understanding that the plan of action for Missouri contained in your letter to the Governor of that State, and your other letter to me, is concurred in by the Governor, it is approved by me, and you will be sustained in proceeding upon it.
Understanding that the plan for Missouri outlined in your letter to the Governor of that State, as well as your other letter to me, has the Governor's agreement, I approve it, and you will have my support in moving forward with it.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL ORD.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, May [March] 20, 1865.
MAJOR-GENERAL ORD, Army of the James
MAJOR-GENERAL ORD, Army of the James
Is it true that George W. Lane is detained at Norfolk without any charge against him? And if so why is it done?
Is it true that George W. Lane is being held in Norfolk without any charges against him? And if that's the case, why is this happening?
TELEGRAM TO JUDGE SCATES.
EXECUTIVE MANSION,
WASHINGTON, March 21, 1865.
WASHINGTON, March 21, 1865.
HON. WALTER B. SCATES, Centralia, Illinois:
HON. WALTER B. SCATES, Centralia, Illinois:
If you choose to go to New Mexico and reside, I will appoint you chief justice there. What say you? Please answer.
If you decide to go to New Mexico and live there, I will make you the chief justice. What do you think? Please reply.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL W. S. HANCOCK.
WASHINGTON, D. C., March 22, 1865. MAJOR-GENERAL HANCOCK, Winchester, Va.:
Seeing your despatch about General Crook, and fearing that through misapprehension something unpleasant may occur, I send you below two despatches of General Grant, which I suppose will fully explain General Crook's movements.
Seeing your message about General Crook, and worried that there might be some misunderstanding that could lead to problems, I’m sharing two messages from General Grant below, which I believe will clearly explain General Crook's actions.
ANOTHER FEMALE SPY
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL DODGE. EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, March 23, 1865.
GENERAL DODGE, Commanding, &c, Saint Louis, Mo.:
GENERAL DODGE, Commanding, &c, Saint Louis, MO:
Allow Mrs. R. S. Ewell the benefit of my amnesty proclamation on her taking the oath.
Allow Mrs. R. S. Ewell to benefit from my amnesty proclamation upon taking the oath.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
CITY POINT, VIRGINIA, March 25, 1865. 8.30 A.M.
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR, Washington, D. C.:
HON. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, Washington, D.C.:
Arrived here all safe about 9 P.M. yesterday. No war news. General Grant does not seem to know very much about Yeatman, but thinks very well of him so far as he does know.
Arrived here safely around 9 PM yesterday. No updates on the war. General Grant doesn’t seem to know much about Yeatman, but he thinks highly of him based on what he does know.
I like Mr. Whiting very much, and hence would wish him to remain or resign as best suits himself. Hearing this much from me, do as you think best in the matter. General Lee has sent the Russell letter back, concluding, as I understand from Grant, that their dignity does not admit of their receiving the document from us. Robert just now tells me there was a little rumpus up the line this morning, ending about where it began.
I really like Mr. Whiting, so I hope he stays or leaves, whichever he prefers. After hearing this from me, do what you think is best in the situation. General Lee has returned the Russell letter, concluding, as I've gathered from Grant, that their dignity prevents them from accepting the document from us. Robert just told me there was a bit of commotion up the line this morning, which ended pretty much where it started.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
(Cipher.)
HEADQUARTERS ARMY OF THE POTOMAC, March 25, 1865. (Received 5 P.M.)
HEADQUARTERS ARMY OF THE POTOMAC, March 25, 1865. (Received 5 P.M.)
HON. EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War:
HON. EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War:
I am here within five miles of the scene of this morning's action. I have nothing to add to what General Meade reports except that I have seen the prisoners myself and they look like there might be the number he states—1600.
I am here within five miles of where this morning's action took place. I have nothing to add to what General Meade reports except that I have seen the prisoners myself and they appear to match the number he mentioned—1600.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
CITY POINT, VA., March 26, 1865. (Received 11.30 A.M.)
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR:
Hon. Secretary of Defense:
I approve your Fort Sumter programme. Grant don't seem to know Yeatman very well, but thinks very well of him so far as he knows. Thinks it probable that Y. is here now, for the place. I told you this yesterday as well as that you should do as you think best about Mr. Whiting's resignation, but I suppose you did not receive the dispatch. I am on the boat and have no later war news than went to you last night.
I approve your Fort Sumter plan. Grant doesn't seem to know Yeatman very well but has a good opinion of him based on what he knows. He thinks it’s likely that Y. is here now, given the situation. I mentioned this to you yesterday, along with the idea that you should do what you think is best about Mr. Whiting's resignation, but I guess you didn’t get the message. I’m on the boat and don’t have any new war news beyond what I sent you last night.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
CITY POINT, VIRGINIA, March 27, 1865.3.35 P.M.
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR, Washington, D.C.:
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR, Washington, D.C.:
Yours inclosing Fort Sumter order received. I think of but one suggestion. I feel quite confident that Sumter fell on the 13th, and not on the 14th of April, as you have it. It fell on Saturday, the 13th; the first call for troops on our part was got up on Sunday, the 14th, and given date and issued on Monday, the 15th. Look up the old almanac and other data, and see if I am not right.
Yours with the order for Fort Sumter has been received. I have just one suggestion. I’m pretty sure that Sumter fell on the 13th, not the 14th of April, as you mentioned. It fell on Saturday, the 13th; the first call for troops from our side was made on Sunday, the 14th, and dated and issued on Monday, the 15th. Check the old almanac and other records to see if I’m not correct.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
CITY POINT, VIRGINIA, March 28, 1865. 12 M.
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR, Washington, D.C.: After your explanation, I think it is little or no difference whether the Fort Sumter ceremony takes place on the 13th or 14th.
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR, Washington, D.C.: After your explanation, I don’t think it matters much whether the Fort Sumter ceremony happens on the 13th or 14th.
General Sherman tells me he is well acquainted with James Yeatman, and that he thinks him almost the best man in the country for anything he will undertake.
General Sherman tells me he's very familiar with James Yeatman and believes he's one of the best people in the country for whatever he sets out to do.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
CITY POINT, VA., March 30, 1865. 7.30 P.M. (Received 8.30 P.M.)
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR:
HON. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE:
I begin to feel that I ought to be at home and yet I dislike to leave without seeing nearer to the end of General Grant's present movement. He has now been out since yesterday morning and although he has not been diverted from his programme no considerable effort has yet been produced so far as we know here. Last night at 10.15 P. M. when it was dark as a rainy night without a moon could be, a furious cannonade soon joined in by a heavy musketry fire opened near Petersburg and lasted about two hours. The sound was very distinct here as also were the flashes of the guns up the clouds. It seemed to me a great battle, but the older hands here scarcely noticed it and sure enough this morning it was found that very little had been done.
I start to feel like I should be at home, but I really don't want to leave without getting a better sense of General Grant's current movement. He's been out since yesterday morning, and even though he hasn't strayed from his plans, we haven't heard of any significant action happening so far. Last night at 10:15 PM, when it was as dark as a rainy night without a moon, a violent cannon fire erupted, followed by heavy gunfire near Petersburg, and it went on for about two hours. The sound was very clear here, and we could see the flashes of the guns lighting up the clouds. It felt like a major battle to me, but the veterans here barely paid attention, and sure enough, this morning we found out that not much had actually happened.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
CITY POINT, VIRGINIA, March 31, 1865. 3 P.M.
SECRETARY STANTON:
SECRETARY STANTON:
At 12.30 P.M. to-day General Grant telegraphed me as follows: "There has been much hard fighting this morning. The enemy drove our left from near Dabney's house back well toward the Boydton plank road. We are now about to take the offensive at that point, and I hope will more than recover the lost ground."
At 12:30 PM today, General Grant sent me a telegram saying: "There has been a lot of intense fighting this morning. The enemy pushed our left side back from near Dabney's house toward the Boydton plank road. We're about to go on the offensive at that location, and I hope we will recover more than the ground we've lost."
Later he telegraphed again as follows:
Later, he sent another telegram that said:
"Our troops, after being driven back to the Boydton plank road, turned and drove the enemy in turn, and took the White Oak road, which we now have. This gives us the ground occupied by the enemy this morning. I will send you a rebel flag captured by our troops in driving the enemy back. There have been four flags captured to-day."
"Our troops, after being pushed back to the Boydton plank road, turned around and pushed the enemy back in return, seizing the White Oak road, which we now control. This gives us the area previously held by the enemy this morning. I will send you a rebel flag captured by our troops during this counter-offensive. Four flags have been captured today."
Judging by the two points from which General Grant telegraphs, I infer that he moved his headquarters about one mile since he sent the first of the two despatches.
Judging by the two points from which General Grant is sending messages, I assume that he moved his headquarters about a mile since he sent the first of the two messages.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
CITY POINT, April 1, 1865.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT:
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT:
Yours to Colonel Bowers about the Secretary of War is shown to me. He is not here, nor have I any notice that he is coming. I presume the mistake comes of the fact that the Secretary of State was here. He started back to Washington this morning. I have your two despatches of this morning, and am anxious to hear from Sheridan.
Yours to Colonel Bowers regarding the Secretary of War has been shown to me. He isn't here, and I haven't heard that he's coming. I assume the confusion comes from the fact that the Secretary of State was here. He headed back to Washington this morning. I have your two messages from this morning, and I'm eager to hear from Sheridan.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
CITY POINT, April 1, 1865. 12.50 P.M.
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR, Washington, D.C.:
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR, Washington, D.C.:
I have had two despatches from General Grant since my last to you, but they contain little additional, except that Sheridan also had pretty hot work yesterday, that infantry was sent to his support during the night, and that he (Grant) has not since heard from Sheridan.
I’ve received two messages from General Grant since my last update to you, but they don’t add much information. All I have is that Sheridan had quite a tough time yesterday, that infantry was sent to support him during the night, and that Grant hasn’t heard from Sheridan since then.
Mrs. Lincoln has started home, and I will thank you to see that our coachman is at the Arsenal wharf at eight o'clock to-morrow morning, there to wait until she arrives.
Mrs. Lincoln has headed home, and I would appreciate it if you could ensure that our driver is at the Arsenal wharf at eight o'clock tomorrow morning to wait for her arrival.
A. LINCOLN. TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY SEWARD.
A. LINCOLN. TEXT MESSAGE TO SECRETARY SEWARD.
CITY POINT, VA., April, 1865. 5.30?.M.
CITY POINT, VA., April, 1865. 5:30 A.M.
HON. W. H. SEWARD, Secretary of State, Fort Monroe:
HON. W. H. SEWARD, Secretary of State, Fort Monroe:
Despatch just received, showing that Sheridan, aided by Warren, had, at 2 P.M., pushed the enemy back, so as to retake the Five Forks and bring his own headquarters up to J. Boisseau's. The Five Forks were barricaded by the enemy and carried by Devin's division of cavalry. This part of the enemy seem to now be trying to work along the White Oak road, to join the main force in front of Grant, while Sheridan and Warren are pressing them as closely as possible.
Message just received, showing that Sheridan, with Warren's help, had pushed the enemy back by 2 P.M., allowing them to reclaim the Five Forks and move his own headquarters to J. Boisseau's location. The Five Forks were barricaded by the enemy and taken by Devin's cavalry division. It seems that this part of the enemy is now trying to maneuver along the White Oak road to join the main force facing Grant, while Sheridan and Warren are pursuing them as closely as possible.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U.S. GRANT. CITY POINT, April 1, 1865.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT:
Yours showing Sheridan's success of to-day is just received and highly appreciated. Having no great deal to do here, I am still sending the substance of your despatches to the Secretary of War.
I just got your update about Sheridan's success today, and I really appreciate it. Since I don’t have much to do here, I'm still forwarding the main points of your messages to the Secretary of War.
TELEGRAM TO MRS. LINCOLN.
CITY POINT, VA., April 2, 1865. 8.30 A.M. (Received 9 A.M.)
MRS. A. LINCOLN, Executive Mansion:
MRS. A. LINCOLN, White House:
Last night General Grant telegraphed that General Sheridan with his cavalry and the Fifth Corps had captured three brigades of infantry, a train of wagons, and several batteries, prisoners amounting to several thousand. This morning General Grant having ordered an attack along the whole line telegraphs as follows.
Last night, General Grant sent a telegram saying that General Sheridan, along with his cavalry and the Fifth Corps, had taken three brigades of infantry, a supply train, and several artillery batteries, capturing several thousand prisoners. This morning, General Grant has ordered an attack along the entire line and sent the following message.
Robert yesterday wrote a little cheerful note to Captain Penrose, which is all he has heard of him since you left.
Robert wrote a little cheerful note to Captain Penrose yesterday, which is all he's heard from him since you left.
TELEGRAMS TO SECRETARY STANTON. CITY POINT, VIRGINIA, April 2, 1865. 8.30
A.M.
AM
HON. E. M. STANTON, Secretary of War:
HON. E. M. STANTON, Secretary of War:
Last night General Grant telegraphed that General Sheridan, with his cavalry and the Fifth Corps, had captured three brigades of infantry, a train of wagons, and several batteries; the prisoners amounting to several thousand.
Last night, General Grant messaged that General Sheridan, along with his cavalry and the Fifth Corps, had taken three infantry brigades, a convoy of wagons, and several artillery units; the number of prisoners totaled several thousand.
This morning General Grant, having ordered an attack along the whole line, telegraphs as follows:
This morning, General Grant, having ordered an attack along the entire line, sends the following telegram:
"Both Wright and Parke got through the enemy's lines. The battle now rages furiously. General Sheridan, with his cavalry, the Fifth corps, and Miles's Division of the Second Corps, which was sent to him this morning, is now sweeping down from the west.
"Both Wright and Parke made it past the enemy's lines. The battle is now intensifying. General Sheridan, with his cavalry, the Fifth Corps, and Miles's Division of the Second Corps, which was sent to him this morning, is now charging in from the west."
"All now looks highly favorable. General Ord is engaged, but I have not yet heard the result in his front."
"Everything looks really promising now. General Ord is in action, but I haven't heard the outcome on his end yet."
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
CITY POINT, April 1. 11.00 A.M.
CITY POINT, April 1. 11:00 A.M.
Despatches are frequently coming in. All is going on finely. Generals Parke, Wright, and Ord's lines are extending from the Appomattox to Hatcher's Run. They have all broken through the enemy's intrenched lines, taking some forts, guns, and prisoners. Sheridan, with his own cavalry, the Fifth Corps, and part of the Second, is coming in from the west on the enemy's flank. Wright is already tearing up the Southside Railroad.
Messages are coming in constantly. Everything is going well. Generals Parke, Wright, and Ord's troops are stretching from the Appomattox to Hatcher's Run. They have all breached the enemy's fortified lines, capturing some forts, artillery, and prisoners. Sheridan, along with his cavalry, the Fifth Corps, and part of the Second, is approaching from the west to hit the enemy's side. Wright is already ripping up the Southside Railroad.
A. LINCOLN
A. Lincoln
CITY POINT, VIRGINIA, April 2. 2 P.M.
CITY POINT, VIRGINIA, April 2. 2 PM.
At 10.45 A.M. General Grant telegraphs as follows:
At 10:45 A.M., General Grant sends a message that says:
"Everything has been carried from the left of the Ninth Corps. The Sixth Corps alone captured more than three thousand prisoners. The Second and Twenty-fourth Corps captured forts, guns, and prisoners from the enemy, but I cannot tell the numbers. We are now closing around the works of the line immediately enveloping Petersburg. All looks remarkably well. I have not yet heard from Sheridan. His headquarters have been moved up to Banks's house, near the Boydton road, about three miles southwest of Petersburg."
"Everything has been moved from the left side of the Ninth Corps. The Sixth Corps alone took more than three thousand prisoners. The Second and Twenty-fourth Corps captured forts, guns, and prisoners from the enemy, but I can't specify the numbers. We are now closing in on the fortifications that are surrounding Petersburg. Everything looks very promising. I haven't heard from Sheridan yet. His headquarters have been relocated to Banks's house, near the Boydton road, about three miles southwest of Petersburg."
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
CITY POINT, VIRGINIA, April 2. 8.30 P.M.
CITY POINT, VIRGINIA, April 2. 8:30 PM.
At 4.30 P.M. to-day General Grant telegraphs as follows:
At 4:30 PM today, General Grant sent the following telegram:
"We are now up and have a continuous line of troops, and in a few hours will be intrenched from the Appomattox below Petersburg to the river above. The whole captures since the army started out will not amount to less than twelve thousand men, and probably fifty pieces of artillery. I do not know the number of men and guns accurately, however. A portion of Foster's Division, Twenty Fourth Corps, made a most gallant charge this afternoon, and captured a very important fort from the enemy, with its entire garrison. All seems well with us, and everything is quiet just now."
"We are up and have a continuous line of troops, and in a few hours we will be entrenched from the Appomattox below Petersburg to the river above. The total captures since the army began its march will be no less than twelve thousand men and probably fifty pieces of artillery. However, I don't know the exact number of men and guns. A part of Foster's Division, Twenty Fourth Corps, made a very brave charge this afternoon and captured a crucial fort from the enemy, along with its entire garrison. Everything seems good with us, and things are quiet right now."
TELEGRAM TO MRS. LINCOLN. CITY POINT, VA., April 1, 1865.
MRS. LINCOLN:
At 4.30 P.M. to-day General Grant telegraphs that he has Petersburg completely enveloped from river below to river above, and has captured, since he started last Wednesday, about twelve thousand prisoners and fifty guns. He suggests that I shall go out and see him in the morning, which I think I will do. Tad and I are both well, and will be glad to see you and your party here at the time you name.
At 4:30 PM today, General Grant sent a message saying that he has completely surrounded Petersburg from the river below to the river above, and since he started last Wednesday, he has captured about twelve thousand prisoners and fifty guns. He suggested that I come out and see him in the morning, which I think I’ll do. Tad and I are both doing well and will be happy to see you and your group here at the time you mentioned.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
CITY POINT, April 2, 1865
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT:
LIEUTENANT GENERAL GRANT:
Allow me to tender to you and all with you the nation's grateful thanks for this additional and magnificent success. At your kind suggestion I think I will meet you to-morrow.
Allow me to extend the nation's heartfelt thanks to you and everyone with you for this remarkable achievement. At your thoughtful suggestion, I believe I'll meet with you tomorrow.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
CITY POINT, VIRGINIA, April 3, 1865.8.30 A.M.
HON. E. M. STANTON, Secretary of War:
HON. E. M. STANTON, Secretary of War:
This morning Lieutenant-General Grant reports Petersburg evacuated, and he is confident that Richmond also is. He is pushing forward to cut off, if possible, the retreating rebel army.
This morning, Lieutenant-General Grant reports that Petersburg has been evacuated, and he is sure that Richmond is too. He is moving ahead to try and cut off the retreating Confederate army.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
CITY POINT, VA., April 3, 1865. 5 P.M.
HON. EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War:
HON. EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War:
Yours received. Thanks for your caution, but I have already been to Petersburg. Staid with General Grant an hour and a half and returned here. It is certain now that Richmond is in our hands, and I think I will go there to-morrow. I will take care of myself.
Got your message. Thanks for your concern, but I've already been to Petersburg. I stayed with General Grant for an hour and a half and came back here. It's certain now that Richmond is under our control, and I think I’ll head there tomorrow. I'll make sure to look after myself.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
CITY POINT, VA., April 4, 1865 (Received 8.45 A.M.)
HON. EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War:
HON. EDWIN M. STANTON, Secretary of War:
General Weitzel telegraphs from Richmond that of railroad stock he found there twenty-eight locomotives, forty-four passenger and baggage cars, and one hundred and six freight cars. At 3.30 this evening General Grant, from Sutherland's Station, ten miles from Petersburg toward Burkevllle, telegraphs as follows:
General Weitzel sends a message from Richmond stating that he discovered twenty-eight locomotives, forty-four passenger and baggage cars, and one hundred and six freight cars. At 3:30 PM this evening, General Grant, from Sutherland's Station, ten miles from Petersburg toward Burkeville, sends the following message:
"General Sheridan picked up twelve hundred prisoners to-day, and from three hundred to five hundred more have been gathered by other troops. The majority of the arms that were left in the hands of the remnant of Lee's army are now scattered between Richmond and where his troops are. The country is also full of stragglers; the line of retreat marked with artillery, ammunition, burned or charred wagons, caissons, ambulances, etc."
"General Sheridan captured twelve hundred prisoners today, and between three hundred and five hundred more have been collected by other troops. Most of the weapons that were left with what’s left of Lee's army are now spread out between Richmond and the location of his troops. The area is also full of stragglers; the retreat route is littered with artillery, ammunition, burned or charred wagons, caissons, ambulances, and so on."
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY SEWARD.
CITY POINT, APRIL 5, 1865. (Received 11.55 PM.)
HON. SECRETARY OF STATE:
Secretary of State:
Yours of to-day received. I think there is no probability of my remaining here more than two days longer. If that is too long come down. I passed last night at Richmond and have just returned.
Your letter from today has been received. I don't think I'll be here for more than two more days. If that's too long, come down. I spent last night in Richmond and have just returned.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
HEADQUARTERS ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES, CITY POINT, April 6, 1865.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT, in the Field:
LT. GEN. GRANT, in the Field:
Secretary Seward was thrown from his carriage yesterday and seriously injured. This, with other matters, will take me to Washington soon. I was at Richmond yesterday and the day before, when and where Judge Campbell, who was with Messrs. Hunter and Stephens in February, called on me, and made such representations as induced me to put in his hands an informal paper, repeating the propositions in my letter of instructions to Mr. Seward, which you remember, and adding that if the war be now further persisted in by the rebels, confiscated property shall at the least bear the additional cost, and that confiscation shall be remitted to the people of any State which will now promptly and in good faith withdraw its troops and other support from resistance to the Government.
Secretary Seward was thrown from his carriage yesterday and seriously injured. Because of this and other matters, I’ll be heading to Washington soon. I was in Richmond yesterday and the day before, where Judge Campbell, who was with Messrs. Hunter and Stephens in February, visited me. He made some points that convinced me to give him an informal document restating the proposals from my letter of instructions to Mr. Seward, which you remember. I also added that if the rebels continue the war now, confiscated property will at least cover the additional costs, and that confiscation will be lifted for any State that promptly and sincerely withdraws its troops and other support from resisting the Government.
Judge Campbell thought it not impossible that the rebel legislature of Virginia would do the latter if permitted; and accordingly I addressed a private letter to General Weitzel, with permission to Judge Campbell to see it, telling him (General Weitzel) that if they attempt this, to permit and protect them, unless they attempt something hostile to the United States, in which case to give them notice and time to leave, and to arrest any remaining after such time.
Judge Campbell thought it was possible that the rebel legislature of Virginia would do this if allowed; so, I wrote a private letter to General Weitzel, which Judge Campbell was permitted to see, telling General Weitzel that if they try this, he should allow and protect them, unless they do something hostile to the United States. In that case, he should give them notice and time to leave and arrest anyone who remains after that time.
I do not think it very probable that anything win come of this, but I have thought best to notify you so that if you should see signs you may understand them.
I don't think it's very likely that anything will come of this, but I thought it would be best to let you know so that if you start to see signs, you'll understand them.
From your recent despatches it seems that you are pretty effectually withdrawing the Virginia troops from opposition to the Government. Nothing that I have done, or probably shall do, is to delay, hinder, or interfere with your work.
From your recent messages, it looks like you're successfully pulling the Virginia troops away from opposing the Government. Nothing I've done, or probably will do, is meant to delay, hinder, or interfere with your efforts.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. WEITZEL.
HEADQUARTERS ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES CITY POINT, April 6, 1865.
MAJOR-GENERAL WEITZEL, Richmond, Va.:
MAJOR-GENERAL WEITZEL, Richmond, VA:
It has been intimated to me that the gentlemen who have acted as the legislature of Virginia in support of the rebellion may now desire to assemble at Richmond and take measures to withdraw the Virginia troops and other support from resistance to the General Government. If they attempt it, give them permission and protection, until, if at all, they attempt some action hostile to the United States, in which case you will notify them, give them reasonable time to leave, and at the end of which time arrest any who remain. Allow Judge Campbell to see this, but do not make it public.
I’ve been told that the men who’ve served as Virginia's legislature in support of the rebellion might want to meet in Richmond and discuss withdrawing Virginia troops and other support from resisting the Federal Government. If they try to do this, allow them to proceed and provide protection, unless they take any action against the United States. In that case, inform them, give them a reasonable amount of time to leave, and after that time, arrest anyone who stays. Let Judge Campbell see this, but keep it confidential.
TELEGRAM TO SECRETARY STANTON.
CITY POINT, VA., April 7, 1865 (Received 10.30 AM.)
HON. SECRETARY OF WAR:
SECRETARY OF WAR:
At 11.15 P.M. yesterday at Burkesville Station, General Grant sends me the following from General Sheridan:
At 11:15 PM yesterday at Burkesville Station, General Grant sent me the following from General Sheridan:
"April 6, 11.15 P.M.
April 6, 11:15 PM
"LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT:
"Lt. Gen. Grant:"
I have the honor to report that the enemy made a stand at the intersection of the Burks Station road with the road upon which they were retreating. I attacked them with two divisions of the Sixth Army Corps and routed them handsomely, making a connection with the cavalry. I am still pressing on with both cavalry and infantry. Up to the present time we have captured Generals Ewell, Kershaw, Button, Corse, DeBare, and Custis Lee, several thousand prisoners, fourteen pieces of artillery with caissons and a large number of wagons. If the thing is pressed I think Lee will surrender.
I’m pleased to report that the enemy took a stand at the intersection of Burks Station road and the road they were retreating on. I attacked them with two divisions from the Sixth Army Corps and successfully routed them, linking up with the cavalry. I’m still pushing forward with both cavalry and infantry. So far, we’ve captured Generals Ewell, Kershaw, Button, Corse, DeBare, and Custis Lee, along with several thousand prisoners, fourteen pieces of artillery with caissons, and a large number of wagons. If we keep the pressure on, I think Lee will surrender.
"P. H. SHERIDAN,
P. H. SHERIDAN,
"Major-General, Commanding."
"Major General, Commanding."
LET THE THING BE PRESSED.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL U. S. GRANT.
HEADQUARTERS ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES,
HEADQUARTERS ARMIES OF THE UNITED STATES,
CITY POINT, April 7, 11 A.M., 1865.
CITY POINT, April 7, 11 A.M., 1865.
LIEUTENANT-GENERAL GRANT:
LT. GEN. GRANT:
Gen. Sheridan says:
Gen. Sheridan says:
"If the thing is pressed I think that Lee will surrender."
"If push comes to shove, I think Lee will give in."
Let the thing be pressed.
Let it be pressed.
NOTE ON A CARD TO SECRETARY STANTON.
April 10, 1865.
Tad wants some flags—can he be accommodated?
Tad wants some flags—can he get some?
RESPONSE TO A CALL,
APRIL 10, 1865
If the company had assembled by appointment, some mistake had crept in their understanding. He had appeared before a larger audience than this one to-day, and he would repeat what he then said, namely, he supposed owing to the great, good news, there would be some demonstration. He would prefer to-morrow evening, when he should be quite willing, and he hoped ready, to say something. He desired to be particular, because every thing he said got into print. Occupying the position he did, a mistake would produce harm, and therefore he wanted to be careful not to make a mistake.
If the company had gathered as scheduled, there must have been some misunderstanding. He had spoken to a larger crowd than this one today, and he would repeat what he said back then: he assumed that due to the great news, there would be some sort of celebration. He would prefer to speak tomorrow evening when he would be fully willing and hopefully ready to share his thoughts. He wanted to be specific because everything he said ended up in print. Given his position, any mistake could cause harm, so he wanted to be careful not to err.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. H. GORDON.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, April 11, 1865.
BRIG. GEN. G. H. GORDON, Norfolk, Va.:
BRIG. GEN. G. H. GORDON, Norfolk, VA:
Send to me at once a full statement as to the cause or causes for which, and by authority of what tribunal George W. Lane, Charles Whitlock, Ezra Baler, J. M. Renshaw, and others are restrained of their liberty. Do this promptly and fully.
Send me right away a complete explanation of the reasons or reasons why, and by the authority of which court George W. Lane, Charles Whitlock, Ezra Baler, J. M. Renshaw, and others are being held. Do this quickly and thoroughly.
PROCLAMATION CLOSING CERTAIN PORTS, APRIL 11, 1865.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas by my proclamations of the 19th and 27th days of April, A.D. 1861, the ports of the United States in the States of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas were declared to be subject to blockade; but
Whereas by my announcements on April 19th and 27th, 1861, the ports of the United States in the states of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas were declared to be under blockade; but
Whereas the said blockade has, in consequence of actual military occupation by this Government, since been conditionally set aside or relaxed in respect to the ports of Norfolk and Alexandria, in the State of Virginia; Beaufort, in the State of North Carolina; Port Royal, in the State of South Carolina; Pensacola and Fernandina, in the State of Florida; and New Orleans, in the State of Louisiana; and
Whereas the blockade has, due to actual military occupation by this Government, now been conditionally lifted or relaxed for the ports of Norfolk and Alexandria in Virginia; Beaufort in North Carolina; Port Royal in South Carolina; Pensacola and Fernandina in Florida; and New Orleans in Louisiana; and
Whereas by the fourth section of the act of Congress approved on the 13th of July, 1861, entitled "An act further to provide for the collection of duties on imports, and for other purposes," the President, for the reasons therein set forth, is authorized to close certain ports of entry:
Whereas by the fourth section of the act of Congress approved on July 13, 1861, titled "An act further to provide for the collection of duties on imports, and for other purposes," the President, for the reasons mentioned in that section, is allowed to close certain ports of entry:
Now, therefore, be it known that I, Abraham Lincoln. President of the United States, do hereby proclaim that the ports of Richmond, Tappahannock, Cherrystone, Yorktown, and Petersburg, in Virginia; of Camden (Elizabeth City), Edenton, Plymouth, Washington, Newbern, Ocracoke, and Wilmington in North Carolina; of Charleston, Georgetown, and Beaufort, in South Carolina; of Savannah, St. Marys, and Brunswick (Darien), in Georgia; of Mobile, in Alabama; of Pearl River (Shieldsboro), Natchez and Vicksburg, in Mississippi; of St. Augustine, Key West, St. Marks (Port Leon), St. Johns (Jacksonville), and Apalachicola, in Florida; of Teche (Franklin), in Louisiana; of Galveston, La Salle, Brazos de Santiago (Point Isabel), and Brownsville, in Texas, are hereby closed, and all right of importation, warehousing, and other privileges shall, in respect to the ports aforesaid, cease until they shall have again been opened by order of the President; and if while said parts are so closed any ship or vessel from beyond the United States or having on board any articles subject to duties shall attempt to enter any such port, the same, together with its tackle, apparel, furniture, and cargo, shall be forfeited to the United States.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, proclaim that the ports of Richmond, Tappahannock, Cherrystone, Yorktown, and Petersburg in Virginia; Camden (Elizabeth City), Edenton, Plymouth, Washington, Newbern, Ocracoke, and Wilmington in North Carolina; Charleston, Georgetown, and Beaufort in South Carolina; Savannah, St. Marys, and Brunswick (Darien) in Georgia; Mobile in Alabama; Pearl River (Shieldsboro), Natchez, and Vicksburg in Mississippi; St. Augustine, Key West, St. Marks (Port Leon), St. Johns (Jacksonville), and Apalachicola in Florida; Teche (Franklin) in Louisiana; and Galveston, La Salle, Brazos de Santiago (Point Isabel), and Brownsville in Texas are all closed. All rights regarding importation, warehousing, and other privileges will stop for these ports until they are reopened by order of the President. If any ship or vessel from outside the United States or carrying goods that are subject to duties tries to enter any of these ports while they are closed, that ship or vessel, along with its equipment, furniture, and cargo, will be confiscated by the United States.
In witness whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.
In witness of this, I have signed my name and attached the seal of the United States.
Done at the city of Washington, this eleventh day of April, A.D., 1865, and of the independence of the United States of America, the eighty-ninth.
Done at the city of Washington, this eleventh day of April, A.D. 1865, and of the independence of the United States of America, the eighty-ninth.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
PROCLAMATION OPENING THE PORT OF KEY WEST,
APRIL 11, 1865.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas by my proclamation of this date the port of Key West, in the State of Florida, was inadvertently included among those which are not open to commerce:
Whereas by my announcement today, the port of Key West, in the State of Florida, was mistakenly included among those that are not open for trade:
Now, therefore, be it known that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, do hereby declare and make known that the said port of Key West is and shall remain open to foreign and domestic commerce upon the same conditions by which that commerce has there hitherto been governed.
Now, therefore, let it be known that I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, declare that the port of Key West is and will continue to be open to foreign and domestic trade under the same conditions that have previously governed that trade.
In testimony whereof I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.
In witness whereof, I have set my hand and affixed the seal of the United States.
Done at the city of Washington, this eleventh day of April, A.D. 1865, and of the independence of the United States of America the eighty-ninth.
Done at the city of Washington, this eleventh day of April, 1865, and of the independence of the United States of America the eighty-ninth.
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
PROCLAMATION CLAIMING EQUALITY OF RIGHTS WITH ALL MARITIME NATIONS,
APRIL 11, 1865.
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA:
A Proclamation.
A Declaration.
Whereas for some time past vessels of war of the United States have been refused in certain foreign ports, privileges and immunities to which they were entitled by treaty, public law, or the community of nations, at the same time that vessels of war of the country wherein the said privileges and immunities have been withheld have enjoyed them fully and uninterruptedly in ports of the United States, which condition of things has not always been forcibly resisted by the United States, although, on the other hand, they have not at any time failed to protest against and declare their dissatisfaction with the same. In the view of the United States, no condition any longer exists which can be claimed to justify the denial to them by any one of such nations of customary naval rights as has heretofore been so unnecessarily persisted in.......
For some time now, U.S. warships have been denied certain privileges and immunities in specific foreign ports that they are entitled to under treaty, public law, or international norms, all while the warships from those countries have enjoyed these rights fully and without interruption in U.S. ports. The United States has not always strongly resisted this situation, but they have consistently protested and expressed their dissatisfaction with it. The U.S. believes there is no longer any valid reason for these nations to deny them standard naval rights that have been unnecessarily withheld in the past.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, do hereby make known that if, after a reasonable time shall have elapsed for intelligence of this proclamation to have reached any foreign country in whose ports the said privileges and immunities shall have been refused as aforesaid, they shall continue to be so refused, then and thenceforth the same privileges and immunities shall be refused to the vessels of war of that country in the ports of the United States, and this refusal shall continue until war vessels of the United States shall have been placed upon an entire equality in the foreign ports aforesaid with similar vessels of other countries. The United States, whatever claim or pretense may have existed heretofore, are now, at least, entitled to claim and concede an entire and friendly equality of rights and hospitalities with all maritime nations.
Now, therefore, I, Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, hereby declare that if, after a reasonable period has passed for this proclamation to reach any foreign country that has denied these privileges and immunities, they continue to deny them, then from that point forward, the same privileges and immunities will be denied to the naval vessels of that country in the ports of the United States. This denial will remain in effect until the naval vessels of the United States are given equal treatment in those foreign ports as similar vessels from other countries. The United States, regardless of any previous claims or pretenses, is now entitled to assert and uphold complete and friendly equality of rights and hospitality with all maritime nations.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed..................
In witness whereof, I have hereunto set my hand, and caused the seal of the United States to be affixed..................
A. LINCOLN.
A. Lincoln.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
By the President: WILLIAM H. SEWARD, Secretary of State.
LAST PUBLIC ADDRESS,
APRIL 11, 1865
FELLOW-CITIZENS—We meet this evening not in sorrow, but in gladness of heart. The evacuation of Petersburg and Richmond, and the surrender of the principal insurgent army, give hope of a righteous and speedy peace, whose joyous expression cannot be restrained. In the midst of this, however, He from whom blessings flow must not be forgotten.
FELLOW-CITIZENS—We gather here tonight not in sadness, but with joyful hearts. The evacuation of Petersburg and Richmond, along with the surrender of the main rebel army, brings hope for a just and quick peace, and our happiness is hard to contain. Yet, in the midst of all this, we must remember the source of our blessings.
A call for a national thanksgiving is being prepared, and will be duly promulgated. Nor must those whose harder part gives us the cause of rejoicing be overlooked. Their honors must not be parceled out with others. I myself was near the front, and had the pleasure of transmitting much of the good news to you. But no part of the honor for plan or execution is mine. To General Grant, his skillful officers, and brave men, all belongs. The gallant navy stood ready, but was not in reach to take active part. By these recent successes, the reinauguration of the national authority—reconstruction which has had a large share of thought from the first, is pressed much more closely upon our attention. It is fraught with great difficulty. Unlike a case of war between independent nations, there is no authorized organ for us to treat with—no one man has authority to give up the rebellion for any other man. We simply must begin with and mould from disorganized and discordant elements. Nor is it a small additional embarrassment that we, the loyal people, differ among ourselves as to the mode, manner, and measure of reconstruction. As a general rule, I abstain from reading the reports of attacks upon myself, Wishing not to be provoked by that to which I cannot properly offer an answer. In spite of this precaution, however, it comes to my knowledge that I am much censured for some supposed agency in setting up and seeking to sustain the new State government of Louisiana. In this I have done just so much and no more than the public knows. In the Annual Message of December, 1863, and the accompanying proclamation, I presented a plan of reconstruction, as the phrase goes, which I promised, if adopted by any State, would be acceptable to and sustained by the Executive Government of the nation. I distinctly stated that this was not the only plan that might possibly be acceptable, and I also distinctly protested that the Executive claimed no right to say when or whether members should be admitted to seats in Congress from such States. This plan was in advance submitted to the then Cabinet, and approved by every member of it. One of them suggested that I should then and in that connection apply the Emancipation Proclamation to the theretofore excepted parts of Virginia and Louisiana; that I should drop the suggestion about apprenticeship for freed people, and that I should omit the protest against my own power in regard to the admission of members of Congress. But even he approved every part and parcel of the plan which has since been employed or touched by the action of Louisiana. The new constitution of Louisiana, declaring emancipation for the whole State, practically applies the proclamation to the part previously excepted. It does not adopt apprenticeship for freed people, and is silent, as it could not well be otherwise, about the admission of members to Congress. So that, as it applied to Louisiana, every member of the Cabinet fully approved the plan. The message went to Congress, and I received many commendations of the plan, written and verbal, and not a single objection to it from any professed emancipationist came to my knowledge until after the news reached Washington that the people of Louisiana had begun to move in accordance with it. From about July, 1862, I had corresponded with different persons supposed to be interested in seeking a reconstruction of a State government for Louisiana. When the message of 1863, with the plan before mentioned, reached New Orleans, General Banks wrote me that he was confident that the people, with his military co-operation, would reconstruct substantially on that plan. I wrote to him and some of them to try it. They tried it, and the result is known. Such has been my only agency in getting up the Louisiana government. As to sustaining it my promise is out, as before stated. But, as bad promises are better broken than kept, I shall treat this as a bad promise and break it, whenever I shall be convinced that keeping it is adverse to the public interest; but I have not yet been so convinced. I have been shown a letter on this subject, supposed to be an able one, in which the writer expresses regret that my mind has not seemed to be definitely fixed upon the question whether the seceded States, so called, are in the Union or out of it. It would perhaps add astonishment to his regret were he to learn that since I have found professed Union men endeavoring to answer that question, I have purposely forborne any public expression upon it. As appears to me, that question has not been nor yet is a practically material one, and that any discussion of it, while it thus remains practically immaterial, could have no effect other than the mischievous one of dividing our friends. As yet, whatever it may become, that question is bad as the basis of a controversy, and good for nothing at all—a merely pernicious abstraction. We all agree that the seceded States, so called, are out of their proper practical relation with the Union, and that the sole object of the Government, civil and military, in regard to those States, is to again get them into their proper practical relation. I believe that it is not only possible, but in fact easier, to do this without deciding or even considering whether those States have ever been out of the Union, than with it. Finding themselves safely at home, it would be utterly immaterial whether they had been abroad. Let us all join in doing the acts necessary to restore the proper practical relations between these States and the Union, and each forever after innocently indulge his own opinion whether, in doing the acts he brought the States from without into the Union, or only gave them proper assistance, they never having been out of it. The amount of constituency, so to speak, on which the Louisiana government rests, would be more satisfactory to all if it contained fifty thousand, or thirty thousand, or even twenty thousand, instead of twelve thousand, as it does. It is also unsatisfactory to some that the elective franchise is not given to the colored man. I would myself prefer that it were now conferred on the very intelligent, and on those who serve our cause as soldiers. Still, the question is not whether the Louisiana government, as it stands, is quite all that is desirable. The question is, Will it be wiser to take it as it is and help to improve it, or to reject and disperse? Can Louisiana be brought into proper practical relation with the Union sooner by sustaining or by discarding her new State government? Some twelve thousand voters in the heretofore Slave State of Louisiana have sworn allegiance to the Union, assumed to be the rightful political power of the State, held elections, organized a State government, adopted a Free State constitution, giving the benefit of public schools equally to black and white, and empowering the Legislature to confer the elective franchise upon the colored man. This Legislature has already voted to ratify the Constitutional Amendment recently passed by Congress, abolishing slavery throughout the nation. These twelve thousand persons are thus fully committed to the Union and to perpetuate freedom in the State—committed to the very things, and nearly all things, the nation wants—and they ask the nation's recognition and its assistance to make good this committal. Now, if we reject and spurn them, we do our utmost to disorganize and disperse them. We, in fact, say to the white man: You are worthless or worse; we will neither help you nor be helped by you. To the blacks we say: This cup of liberty which these, your old masters, held to your lips, we will dash from you, and leave you to the chances of gathering the spilled and scattered contents in some vague and undefined when, where, and how. If this course, discouraging and paralyzing both white and black, has any tendency to bring Louisiana into proper practical relations with the Union, I have so far been unable to perceive it. If, on the contrary, we recognize and sustain the new government of Louisiana, the converse of all this is made true. We encourage the hearts and nerve the arms of twelve thousand to adhere to their work, and argue for it, and proselyte for it, and fight for it, and feed it, and grow it, and ripen it to a complete success. The colored man, too, in seeing all united for him, is inspired with vigilance, and energy, and daring to the same end. Grant that he desires the elective franchise, will he not attain it sooner by saving the already advanced steps towards it, than by running backward over them? Concede that the new government of Louisiana is only to what it should be as the egg is to the fowl, we shall sooner have the fowl by hatching the egg than by smashing it. Again, if we reject Louisiana, we also reject one vote in favor of the proposed amendment to the National Constitution. To meet this proposition, it has been argued that no more than three fourths of those States which have not attempted secession are necessary to validly ratify the amendment. I do not commit myself against this, further than to say that such a ratification would be questionable, and sure to be persistently questioned, while a ratification by three fourths of all the States would be unquestioned and unquestionable. I repeat the question, Can Louisiana be brought into proper practical relation with the Union sooner by sustaining or by discarding her new State government? What has been said of Louisiana will apply to other States. And yet so great peculiarities pertain to each State, and such important and sudden changes occur in the same State, and withal so new and unprecedented is the whole case, that no exclusive and inflexible plan can safely be prescribed as to details and collaterals. Such exclusive and inflexible plan would surely become a new entanglement. Important principles may and must be inflexible. In the present situation as the phrase goes, it may be my duty to make some new announcement to the people of the South. I am considering, and shall not fail to act, when satisfied that action will be proper.
A national day of thanksgiving is being organized and will be announced soon. We shouldn’t forget those whose hard work has given us reason to celebrate. Their contributions shouldn’t be mixed with others. I was close to the action and had the pleasure of sharing a lot of good news with you. However, I take no credit for the planning or execution, as all the credit goes to General Grant, his skilled officers, and brave men. The gallant navy was ready but wasn’t involved. These recent successes bring the restoration of national authority—reconstruction, which has been at the forefront of our thoughts, much closer to our attention. This process is very challenging. Unlike a war between independent nations, we have no official representatives to negotiate with—no one individual has the authority to end the rebellion on behalf of another. We must start with and shape disorganized and conflicting elements. Additionally, it's a real challenge that we loyal citizens don't all agree on how, when, and to what extent reconstruction should take place. Generally, I avoid reading attacks against myself, not wanting to be provoked by things I can't properly respond to. Still, I’ve learned that I’m criticized for some supposed role in establishing and supporting the new State government of Louisiana. In this, I’ve done exactly what the public knows—nothing more. In my Annual Message of December 1863 and the accompanying proclamation, I outlined a reconstruction plan that I promised would be accepted and supported by the Executive Government if adopted by any State. I clearly stated that this wasn’t the only plan that might be acceptable, and I also protested that the Executive claimed no right to decide when or whether members from such States should be seated in Congress. This plan was presented to the Cabinet at the time, and every member approved it. One member even suggested that I should connect the Emancipation Proclamation to the parts of Virginia and Louisiana that were previously exempt; that I should drop the point about apprenticeship for freed people, and that I should omit my protest about my own power regarding the admission of Congress members. But even this member approved every part of the plan that Louisiana has since adopted or acted upon. Louisiana’s new constitution, which declares emancipation for the entire State, effectively applies the proclamation to the previously exempted areas. It does not introduce apprenticeship for freed people, and, understandably, it doesn’t address the admission of Congress members. Thus, every Cabinet member fully backed the plan as it related to Louisiana. The message went to Congress, and I received many praises for the plan, both written and verbal, and not a single objection from any self-identified emancipationist reached me until after news broke in Washington that the people of Louisiana had begun to act on it. Since July 1862, I had been in touch with various individuals thought to be interested in reconstructing Louisiana's State government. When the 1863 message with the aforementioned plan reached New Orleans, General Banks told me he was confident the people would reconstruct based on that plan with his military support. I encouraged him and some of them to try it. They did, and the outcome is well-known. That has been my only involvement in establishing the Louisiana government. As for maintaining it, my commitment is as stated before. But since promises that are harmful are better broken than kept, I’m treating this as one of those bad promises and will break it whenever I truly believe that keeping it is against the public interest; however, I have yet to be convinced of that. I’ve seen a letter regarding this matter that claims to have a strong argument, where the writer expresses regret that my position hasn’t seemed solid on whether the so-called seceded States are in or out of the Union. It might be surprising to him to know that since I’ve seen professed Union supporters trying to answer that question, I've intentionally refrained from publicly stating my opinion on it. It seems to me that this question hasn’t been and isn’t materially relevant, and discussing it while it remains practically irrelevant would only serve to divide our supporters. At this point, whatever it may become, that question is unhelpful as a basis for controversy and has no real value—just a misguided idea. We all agree that the seceded States are not in their rightful practical relation to the Union, and that the Government’s sole purpose—both civil and military—regarding those States is to restore that proper relationship. I believe it’s not only possible but actually easier to accomplish this without deciding or considering whether those States have ever technically been out of the Union than it is with that consideration. Once they find themselves safely at home, it doesn’t matter whether they had been away. Let’s work together to do what’s needed to restore the proper practical relations between these States and the Union. Each of us can then quietly hold our own views on whether, through these actions, we brought the States back into the Union or simply assisted them, believing they were never actually out. The number of constituents supporting the Louisiana government would be more reassuring if it included fifty thousand, thirty thousand, or even twenty thousand voters instead of just twelve thousand. Some are also dissatisfied that the right to vote hasn’t been granted to Black citizens. I would personally prefer it were given to the educated ones and those who have served as soldiers. Still, the key issue isn’t whether the Louisiana government, as it stands, is ideal. The question is: Is it wiser to accept it as it is and help to improve it, or to reject and dismantle it? Can Louisiana be brought back into proper practical relation with the Union faster by supporting or by discarding her new State government? About twelve thousand voters in Louisiana, formerly a Slave State, have pledged allegiance to the Union, claimed to be the rightful political power of the State, held elections, organized a State government, adopted a Free State constitution that provides equal public schooling to both Black and White students, and empowered the Legislature to grant voting rights to Black citizens. This Legislature has already voted to ratify the Constitutional Amendment passed by Congress that abolishes slavery nationwide. These twelve thousand individuals are fully committed to the Union and to preserving freedom in the State—aligned with almost everything the nation desires—and they are asking for the nation’s recognition and support to fulfill this commitment. Now, if we reject and turn our backs on them, we do everything we can to disband and destroy their efforts. We essentially say to the white population: You’re worthless or worse; we won’t help you, and we won’t allow you to help us. To the Black community, we say: This chance at freedom that your former masters offered you, we will take away and leave you to struggle to gather the remnants of what you might have had at some uncertain time, in some unclear way. If this discouraging and paralyzing approach has any chance of bringing Louisiana back into proper practical relations with the Union, I have yet to see it. On the other hand, if we recognize and support the new government of Louisiana, the opposite becomes true. We uplift and empower twelve thousand individuals to stay committed to their cause, advocating for it, and fight for it, and grow it, leading it to complete success. The Black citizen, witnessing everyone rallying for his support, is motivated with enthusiasm, energy, and bravery toward the same goal. If he desires the right to vote, won’t he achieve it sooner by working to advance what has already begun, rather than trying to retreat? Grant that the new government of Louisiana is only a fraction of what it should be, as an egg is to a chicken; we’ll get to the chicken faster by hatching the egg than by breaking it. Moreover, if we reject Louisiana, we also forfeit one vote in favor of the proposed amendment to the National Constitution. To counter this argument, it has been said that only three-fourths of the States that haven’t tried to secede are needed to validly ratify the amendment. I’m not fully opposing this, other than to say that such a ratification could be questionable and likely to be continuously challenged, while a ratification by three-fourths of all the States would be beyond questioning. I reiterate, can Louisiana be brought back into proper practical relation with the Union faster by supporting or by discarding her new State government? What I’ve said about Louisiana applies to other States as well. Yet, great differences exist for each State, and important and sudden changes occur within the same State; the overall situation is so new and unprecedented that we can’t establish a strict, inflexible plan for details and related matters. Such a rigid plan would surely lead to new complications. While important principles must remain unchanging, in the current situation, I believe it may be my duty to announce something new to the people of the South. I am considering it and won’t hesitate to act when I believe it is appropriate.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. WEITZEL.
WASHINGTON, D. C., April 12, 1865. MAJOR-GENERAL WEITZEL, Richmond, Va.:
I have seen your despatch to Colonel Hardie about the matter of prayers. I do not remember hearing prayers spoken of while I was in Richmond; but I have no doubt you have acted in what appeared to you to be the spirit and temper manifested by me while there. Is there any sign of the rebel legislature coming together on the understanding of my letter to you? If there is any such sign, inform me what it is; if there is no such sign, you may withdraw the offer.
I’ve seen your message to Colonel Hardie regarding the prayers issue. I don’t recall hearing prayers mentioned while I was in Richmond, but I’m sure you’ve acted based on what you felt was my attitude during my time there. Is there any indication that the rebel legislature is gathering based on my letter to you? If there is, please let me know what it is; if there’s no sign, feel free to withdraw the offer.
TELEGRAM TO GENERAL G. WEITZEL. WASHINGTON, D.C., April 12, 1865.
MAJOR-GENERAL WEITZEL, Richmond, Va.:
I have just seen Judge Campbell's letter to you of the 7th. He assumes, as appears to me, that I have called the insurgent legislature of Virginia together, as the rightful legislature of the State, to settle all differences with the United States. I have done no such thing. I spoke of them, not as a legislature, but as "the gentlemen who have acted as the legislature of Virginia in support of the rebellion." I did this on purpose to exclude the assumption that I was recognizing them as a rightful body. I deal with them as men having power de facto to do a specific thing, to wit: "To withdraw the Virginia troops and other support from resistance to the General Government," for which, in the paper handed Judge Campbell, I promised a specific equivalent, to wit: a remission to the people of the State, except in certain cases, of the confiscation of their property. I meant this, and no more. Inasmuch, however, as Judge Campbell misconstrues this, and is still pressing for an armistice, contrary to the explicit statement of the paper I gave him, and particularly as General Grant has since captured the Virginia troops, so that giving a consideration for their withdrawal is no longer applicable, let my letter to you and the paper to Judge Campbell both be withdrawn, or countermanded, and he be notified of it. Do not now allow them to assemble, but if any have come, allow them safe return to their homes.
I just saw Judge Campbell's letter to you from the 7th. He seems to think, as it appears to me, that I have called together the insurgent legislature of Virginia as the legitimate legislature of the State to resolve all issues with the United States. I have not done that. I referred to them not as a legislature, but as "the gentlemen who have acted as the legislature of Virginia in support of the rebellion." I did this intentionally to clarify that I was not recognizing them as a legitimate body. I am interacting with them as individuals who have the actual power to do one specific thing: "To withdraw the Virginia troops and other support from resisting the General Government." In the document I gave to Judge Campbell, I promised a specific equivalent: a pardon for the people of the State, except in certain cases, regarding the seizure of their property. That was my intention, and nothing more. However, since Judge Campbell has misunderstood this and is still pushing for a ceasefire, which goes against the clear statement in the document I provided him, and especially since General Grant has since captured the Virginia troops—making the consideration for their withdrawal irrelevant—please withdraw or cancel my letter to you and the document for Judge Campbell and inform him of this. Do not allow them to gather now, but if anyone has arrived, let them return safely to their homes.
INTERVIEW WITH SCHUYLER COLFAX ON THE MORNING OF APRIL 14, 1865.
Mr. Colfax, I want you to take a message from me to the miners whom you visit. I have very large ideas of the mineral wealth of our nation. I believe it practically inexhaustible. It abounds all over the Western country, from the Rocky Mountains to the Pacific, and its development has scarcely commenced. During the war, when we were adding a couple of millions of dollars every day to our national debt, I did not care about encouraging the increase in the volume of our precious metals. We had the country to save first. But now that the rebellion is overthrown, and we know pretty nearly the amount of our national debt, the more gold and silver we mine, we make the payment of that debt so much the easier. "Now," said he, speaking with more emphasis, "I am going to encourage that in every possible way. We shall have hundreds of thousands of disbanded soldiers, and many have feared that their return home in such great numbers might paralyze industry, by furnishing, suddenly, a greater supply of labor than there will be demand for. I am going to try to attract them to the hidden wealth of our mountain ranges, where there is room enough for all. Immigration, which even the war has not stopped, will land upon our shores hundreds of thousands more per year from overcrowded Europe. I intend to point them to the gold and silver that wait for them in the West. Tell the miners for me, that I shall promote their interests to the utmost of my ability; because their prosperity is the prosperity of the nation; and," said he, his eye kindling with enthusiasm, "we shall prove, in a very few years, that we are indeed the treasury of the world."
Mr. Colfax, I want you to pass a message on to the miners you meet. I have really big ideas about the mineral wealth of our country. I believe it’s practically unlimited. It’s everywhere in the Western states, from the Rocky Mountains to the Pacific, and its development has barely started. During the war, when we were adding millions of dollars each day to our national debt, I didn’t want to encourage more precious metals being mined. We had to focus on saving the country first. But now that the rebellion is over and we have a good understanding of our national debt, the more gold and silver we mine, the easier it will be to pay off that debt. “Now,” he said, emphasizing his point, “I’m going to encourage this in every way I can. We will have hundreds of thousands of disbanded soldiers, and many are worried that their return in such large numbers might disrupt industries by suddenly providing more labor than there is demand for. I’m going to try to draw them to the hidden wealth of our mountain ranges, where there’s plenty of room for everyone. Immigration, which hasn’t stopped even during the war, will bring hundreds of thousands more each year from overcrowded Europe. I plan to direct them to the gold and silver waiting for them in the West. Tell the miners that I will support their interests to the best of my ability because their success is the nation’s success; and,” he said, his eyes lighting up with enthusiasm, “we will show, in just a few years, that we really are the treasury of the world.”
TO GENERAL VAN ALLEN.
EXECUTIVE MANSION, WASHINGTON, April 14, 1865
GENERAL VAN ALLEN:
GENERAL VAN ALLEN:
I intend to adopt the advice of my friends and use due precaution.... I thank you for the assurance you give me that I shall be supported by conservative men like yourself, in the efforts I may make to restore the Union, so as to make it, to use your language, a Union of hearts and hands as well as of States.
I plan to take my friends' advice and be careful... I appreciate the reassurance that I will have support from conservative people like you in my efforts to restore the Union, turning it into, as you put it, a Union of hearts and hands, not just of States.
Yours truly,
Sincerely,
LINCOLN'S LAST WRITTEN WORDS
Allow Mr. Ashmer and friend to come in at 9 A.M. to-morrow.
A. LINCOLN. April 14, 1865
A. LINCOLN. April 14, 1865
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!