This is a modern-English version of Notes and Queries, Number 211, November 12, 1853: A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc., originally written by Various.
It has been thoroughly updated, including changes to sentence structure, words, spelling,
and grammar—to ensure clarity for contemporary readers, while preserving the original spirit and nuance. If
you click on a paragraph, you will see the original text that we modified, and you can toggle between the two versions.
Scroll to the bottom of this page and you will find a free ePUB download link for this book.
NOTES AND QUERIES:
A MEDIUM OF INTER-COMMUNICATION FOR LITERARY MEN, ARTISTS, ANTIQUARIES, GENEALOGISTS, ETC.
"When found, make a note of."—Captain Cuttle.
No. 211. No. 211. |
Saturday, November 12. 1853. Saturday, November 12, 1853. |
Price Fourpence. Price 4d. |
CONTENTS.
Notes:— Notes:— |
Page Page |
Notes on Grammont, by G. Steinman Steinman Notes on Grammont, by G. Steinman Steinman |
|
Change of Meaning in Proverbial Expressions, by Thos. Keightley Change of Meaning in Proverbial Expressions, by Thos. Keightley |
|
Extracts from Colchester Corporation Records, by Jas. Whishaw Extracts from Colchester Corporation Records, by Jas. Whishaw |
|
Convocation in the Reign of George II., by W. Fraser Convocation in the Reign of George II., by W. Fraser |
|
Parallel Passages, by Harry Leroy Temple Parallel Passages, by Harry Leroy Temple |
|
Shakspeare Correspondence, by J. O. Halliwell Shakespeare Correspondence, by J. O. Halliwell |
|
Minor Notes:—Local Rhymes, Kent—Samuel Pepys's Grammar—Roman Remains—To grab—Curfew at Sandwich—Ecclesiastical Censure—The Natural History of Balmoral—Shirt Collars Minor Notes:—Local Rhymes, Kent—Samuel Pepys's Grammar—Roman Remnants—To seize—Curfew in Sandwich—Church Censure—The Natural History of Balmoral—Shirt Collars |
|
Queries:— Questions:— |
|
"Days of my Youth" "Youthful Days" |
|
Minor Queries:—Randall Minshull and his Cheshire Collections—Mackey's "Theory of the Earth"—Birthplace of King Edward V.—Name of Infants—Geometrical Curiosity—Denison Family—"Came"—Montmartre—Law of Copyright: British Museum—Veneration for the Oak—Father Matthew's Chickens—Pronunciation of Bible and Prayer Book proper Names—MSS. of Anthony Bave—Return of Gentry, temp. Hen. VI.—Taylor's "Holy Living"—Captain Jan Dimmeson—Greek and Roman Fortification—The Queen at Chess—Vida on Chess Quick Questions:—Randall Minshull and his Cheshire Collections—Mackey's "Theory of the Earth"—Birthplace of King Edward V.—Names of Infants—Geometrical Curiosity—Denison Family—"Came"—Montmartre—Copyright Law: British Museum—Respect for the Oak—Father Matthew's Chickens—Pronunciation of Bible and Prayer Book Names—MSS. of Anthony Bave—Return of Gentry, time of Henry VI.—Taylor's "Holy Living"—Captain Jan Dimmeson—Greek and Roman Fortification—The Queen at Chess—Vida on Chess |
|
Minor Queries with Answers:—Thornton Abbey—Bishop Wilson's "Sacra Privata"—Derivation of "Chemistry"—Burning for Witchcraft—The small City Companies—Rousseau and Boileau—Bishop Kennett's MS. Diary Minor Questions with Answers:—Thornton Abbey—Bishop Wilson's "Sacra Privata"—Origin of "Chemistry"—Burning for Witchcraft—The small City Companies—Rousseau and Boileau—Bishop Kennett's MS. Diary |
|
Replies:— Responses:— |
|
Milton's Widow, by S. W. Singer Milton's Widow, by S. W. Singer |
|
Oaths, by Honoré de Mareville, &c. Oaths, by Honoré de Mareville, &c. |
|
Comminatory Inscriptions in Books, by Philarète Chasles Comminatory Inscriptions in Books, by Philarète Chasles |
|
Liveries Worn, and Menial Services performed, by Gentlemen, by J. Lewelyn Curtis Liveries Worn, and Menial Services performed, by Gentlemen, by J. Lewelyn Curtis |
|
Female Parish Clerks Women Parish Clerks |
|
Poetical Epithets of the Nightingale, by W. Pinkerton Poetical Epithets of the Nightingale, by W. Pinkerton |
|
Photographic Correspondence:—Photographic Exhibition—How much Light is obstructed by a Lens?—Stereoscopic Angles—To introduce Clouds Photo Exchange:—Photographic Exhibition—How much Light is blocked by a Lens?—Stereoscopic Angles—To add Clouds |
|
Replies to Minor Queries:—Death of Edward II.—Luther no Iconoclast—Rev. Urban Vigors—Portrait of Baretti—Passage in Sophocles—Brothers of the same Name—High Dutch and Low Dutch—Translations of the Prayer Book into French—Divining-rod—Slow-worm Superstition—Ravailliac—Lines on the Institution of the Garter—Passage in Bacon—What Day is it at our Antipodes?—Calves' Head Club—Heraldic Query—The Temple Lands in Scotland—Sir John Vanbrugh—Sir Arthur Aston—Nugget Responses to Minor Questions:—Death of Edward II.—Luther not an Iconoclast—Rev. Urban Vigors—Portrait of Baretti—Passage in Sophocles—Brothers with the Same Name—High German and Low German—Translations of the Prayer Book into French—Divining Rod—Slow Worm Superstition—Ravaillac—Lines on the Institution of the Garter—Passage in Bacon—What Day Is It at Our Antipodes?—Calves' Head Club—Heraldic Query—The Temple Lands in Scotland—Sir John Vanbrugh—Sir Arthur Aston—Nugget |
|
Miscellaneous:— Miscellaneous:— |
|
Books and Odd Volumes wanted Books and rare volumes wanted |
|
Notices to Correspondents Notices to Correspondents |
|
Advertisements Ads |
Notes.
NOTES ON GRAMMONT.
Agreeing with Mr. Peter Cunningham (vide History of Nell Gwyn), that a new edition of Grammont is much wanted, I beg to avail myself of your pages, and to offer a few remarks and notes which I have made in reference to that very entertaining work for the consideration of a future annotator.
Agreeing with Mr. Peter Cunningham (see History of Nell Gwyn), that a new edition of Grammont is greatly needed, I would like to use your pages to offer a few comments and notes I've made regarding that truly entertaining work for the consideration of a future annotator.
Of the several maids of honour mentioned therein I will begin with those of the queen. They are Miss Stewart, Miss "Warminster," Miss Bellenden, Miss Bardon, Miss de la Garde, Miss Wells, Miss Livingston, Miss Fielding, and Miss Boynton.
Of the several maids of honor mentioned there, I'll start with the ones for the queen. They are Miss Stewart, Miss Warminster, Miss Bellenden, Miss Bardon, Miss de la Garde, Miss Wells, Miss Livingston, Miss Fielding, and Miss Boynton.
The names of Miss Stewart (Frances Theresa), Miss Boynton (Catherine), Miss Wells (Winefred), and Miss Warmistre are found among the original six, appointed on the queen's marriage, May 21, 1662. The affiliation and marriages of the first two have been well ascertained, but Miss Warmistre's birth is yet open to some conjecture, whilst her marriage, like Miss Wells's parentage, is wholly unknown.
The names of Miss Stewart (Frances Theresa), Miss Boynton (Catherine), Miss Wells (Winefred), and Miss Warmistre are listed among the original six who were appointed when the queen got married on May 21, 1662. The connections and marriages of the first two are well documented, but Miss Warmistre's birth remains uncertain, and her marriage, like Miss Wells's background, is completely unknown.
Horace Walpole, on the authority of the last Earl of Arran, of the Butler family, has confounded her with Mary, one of the daughters of George Kirke, Esq., a groom of the bedchamber to Charles I., by Mary his wife, daughter of Aurelian Townsend, Esq., "the admired beauty of the tymes," on whose marriage at Christ Church, Oxford, February 26, 1645-6, "the king gave her." She herself was maid of honour to the Duchess of York in 1674, and the year following left the court, we may believe, under the same circumstances as Miss Warmistre, more than ten years before, had quitted it: after being the mistress of Sir Thomas Vernon, the second Baronet of Hodnet in Shropshire, she became his wife, and ended her life in miserable circumstances at Greenwich in 1711.
Horace Walpole, citing the last Earl of Arran from the Butler family, has mixed her up with Mary, one of the daughters of George Kirke, Esq., a groom of the bedchamber to Charles I., and his wife, Mary, who was the daughter of Aurelian Townsend, Esq., "the admired beauty of the times." The king gifted her on the occasion of her marriage at Christ Church, Oxford, on February 26, 1645-6. She served as a maid of honour to the Duchess of York in 1674, and the following year, we can assume, she left the court under similar circumstances to those that led Miss Warmistre to leave more than ten years earlier. After being the mistress of Sir Thomas Vernon, the second Baronet of Hodnet in Shropshire, she married him and ended her life in unfortunate circumstances in Greenwich in 1711.
"1711, 17 August, Dame Mary, relict of Sir Thomas Vernon, carried away."—Burial register of Greenwich Church.
"August 17, 1711, Dame Mary, the widow of Sir Thomas Vernon, died."—Burial register of Greenwich Church.
She was sister to Diana, the last De Vere, Earl of Oxford's, countess, a lady of as free a morality {462}as herself and as her mother, and second wife of Sir Thomas, whose first lady, Elizabeth Cholmondley, died in June, 1676. Sir Thomas died February 5, 1682-3, leaving by her three children, Sir Richard, the last baronet, Henrietta, and Diana, who all died unmarried.
She was the sister of Diana, the last De Vere, Earl of Oxford's countess, a woman with a similarly free moral outlook as her and her mother, and the second wife of Sir Thomas, whose first wife, Elizabeth Cholmondley, passed away in June 1676. Sir Thomas died on February 5, 1682-83, leaving behind three children with her: Sir Richard, the last baronet, Henrietta, and Diana, all of whom died single.
A portrait of Lady Vernon, by Sir Peter Lely, has been engraved in mezzotinto by Browne, and lettered "Mary Kirk, Lady Vernon, maid of honour to Queen Catherine." Another portrait (?) has been engraved by Scheneker for Harding's Grammont, 1793. A third portrait was purchased at the Strawberry Hill sale, by Mr. Rodd of Little Newport Street, for 1l. 5s.
A portrait of Lady Vernon, by Sir Peter Lely, has been engraved in mezzotint by Browne, and labeled "Mary Kirk, Lady Vernon, maid of honor to Queen Catherine." Another portrait (?) has been engraved by Scheneker for Harding's Grammont, 1793. A third portrait was bought at the Strawberry Hill sale by Mr. Rodd of Little Newport Street for £1. 5s.
A portrait of the Countess of Oxford is or was at Mr. Drummond's of Great Stanmore. It was bequeathed to his family by Charles, first Duke of St. Alban's, who was her ladyship's son-in-law.
A portrait of the Countess of Oxford is or was at Mr. Drummond's in Great Stanmore. It was left to his family by Charles, the first Duke of St. Alban's, who was her ladyship's son-in-law.
Of Mrs. Anne Kirke, who was "woman to the queen" Henrietta Maria, there are several portraits. Granger records:
Of Mrs. Anne Kirke, who was the "lady to the queen" Henrietta Maria, there are several portraits. Granger records:
"Madam Kirk. Vandyck p. Gaywood f. h. sh.
"Madam Kirk. Vandyck p. Gaywood f. h. sh."
"Madam Anne Kirk. Vandyck p. Browne, large h. sh. mezz."
"Madam Anne Kirk. Vandyck p. Browne, large h. sh. mezz."
These engravings are most probably from the same painting—the fine whole-length exhibited last year among the collection of pictures by ancient masters in Pall Mall:
These engravings most likely come from the same painting—the beautiful full-length piece displayed last year in the collection of works by old masters in Pall Mall:
"Madam Kirk, sitting in a chair, Hollar, f. h. sh."
"Madam Kirk, sitting in a chair, Hollar, f. h. sh."
He also mentions her miniature at Burghley.
He also talks about her miniature at Burghley.
There is at Wilton a splendid painting by Vandyck of Mrs. Kirk, seated with the Countess of Morton, Lady Anne Keith, eldest daughter of George, fifth Earl Mareschal, and wife of William Douglass, seventh Earl of Morton, K.G. She was governess to the Princess Henrietta.
There is a stunning painting by Vandyck of Mrs. Kirk at Wilton, where she is seated with the Countess of Morton, Lady Anne Keith, the eldest daughter of George, the fifth Earl Mareschal, and wife of William Douglass, the seventh Earl of Morton, K.G. She was the governess to Princess Henrietta.
This painting has been engraved by Grousvelt. There is another engraving from the first-named Vandyck by Beckett.
This painting was engraved by Grousvelt. There’s another engraving of the first-mentioned Vandyck by Beckett.
Of Lady Vernon and her mother there is to be found mention, in the secret service expenses of Charles II. and James II., lately printed. The elder lady on her husband's death (he was buried in the cloisters of Westminster Abbey, April 5, 1679) seems to have had a pension of 250l. per annum. The younger was the recipient, on two occasions, of 100l. "bounty" only.
Of Lady Vernon and her mother, there is mention in the secret service expenses of Charles II and James II, which were recently published. The elder lady, after her husband's death (he was buried in the cloisters of Westminster Abbey on April 5, 1679), appears to have received a pension of 250l. per year. The younger lady was given 100l. as a "bounty" on two separate occasions.
Mrs. Kirke and her daughter Diana are unfavourably alluded to by Mrs. Grace Worthley, a lady of the same class, who will not "be any longer a laughing-stock for any of Mr. Kirk's bastards" (vide letter to her cousin Lord Brandon, September 7, 1682, Diary of Henry Sidney, Earl of Romney, i. pp. xxxiii. xxxiv.). And again, the same lady, in another letter, speaks of "the common Countess of Oxford and her adulterous bastards" (Ibid.). Mr. Jesse's quotation from "Queries and Answers from Garraway's Coffee House" (vide The Court of the Stewarts, vol. ii. p. 366.) may be here reproduced in support of the epitaph which this angry lady has been pleased to assign the countess, who, it would seem, had robbed her, well born and well married, of her noble keeper "the handsome Sidney:"
Mrs. Kirke and her daughter Diana are negatively mentioned by Mrs. Grace Worthley, a woman from the same social class, who refuses to "be a laughingstock for any of Mr. Kirk's illegitimate children" (see letter to her cousin Lord Brandon, September 7, 1682, Diary of Henry Sidney, Earl of Romney, i. pp. xxxiii. xxxiv.). Additionally, the same woman, in another letter, refers to "the common Countess of Oxford and her adulterous children" (Ibid.). Mr. Jesse's quote from "Queries and Answers from Garraway's Coffee House" (see The Court of the Stewarts, vol. ii. p. 366.) can be included here to support the insult this upset lady has given to the countess, who apparently took away her noble partner "the handsome Sidney":
"Q. How often has Mrs. Kirk sold her daughter Di. before the Lord of Oxford married her?
"Q. How many times did Mrs. Kirk sell her daughter Di before the Lord of Oxford married her?"
A. Ask the Prince and Harry Jermyn."
A. Ask the Prince and Harry Jermyn.
The following curious extract from one of the Heber MSS. at Hodnet has been kindly furnished me by Charles Cholmondeley, Esq., of the Ivy House, Wisbeach, co. Cambridge, to whom the MS. belongs:
The following interesting excerpt from one of the Heber manuscripts at Hodnet has been generously provided to me by Charles Cholmondeley, Esq., of Ivy House, Wisbeach, in Cambridgeshire, to whom the manuscript belongs:
"H——,
"H——,
"Sir Thomas the second baronet's death is mentioned in Lady Rachael Russell's letters. His second wife was one of King Charles's Beauties, but the account in Granger of her is not correct, as it appears that she lived some time with Sir Thomas, as mistress, before their marriage. He left her in great distress, as the profits of the estate were embezzled by attorneys and stewards. The following is a copy from a letter from her to one Squibb, an attorney who had the management of the estate:
"Sir Thomas, the second baronet, is mentioned in Lady Rachael Russell's letters following his death. His second wife was one of King Charles's Beauties, but Granger's description of her is wrong because she apparently lived with Sir Thomas as his mistress for a while before they got married. He left her in considerable distress since the estate's profits were taken by attorneys and stewards. Below is a copy of a letter she wrote to an attorney named Squibb, who was responsible for managing the estate:"
'Sir,
'Sir,
'When you were last here you were pleased to say that in some little time I should be payd some money. I have had with me my woman's husband yt did serve mee about two yeares since; and hee is soe impatient for what I owe her yt hee will staye noe longer. It is given me to understand I must goe to prison or paye part of wt I owe him. Things fly to a great violence, and if you thinke it will bee for the credit or advantage of my childerne yt such an afront should come to mee, is the question. I have nothing to depend on but wt must come from the estate of Sir Richard Vernon. How I have been used by the trustees you are noe stranger to. I am now forced to live on charity, and I grow every day more and more weary of it. For my childern's sake I remain in England, or else I would seeke my fortune elsewhere. Pray to take this into consideration, and see wt can be done.
The last time you were here, you said I would be getting some money soon. I've been in touch with my wife's husband, who helped me about two years ago, and he's become so impatient for what I owe her that he can't wait any longer. I've been warned that I might end up in jail or have to pay part of what I owe him. Things are getting really out of control, and I'm left wondering if it would be better for my children if I find myself in such a situation. The only thing I'm depending on is what I expect from Sir Richard Vernon's estate. You know how poorly I've been treated by the trustees. I'm now forced to rely on charity, and I’m getting more and more tired of it every day. For my children's sake, I'm staying in England; otherwise, I would be looking for opportunities somewhere else. Please think about this and see what can be done.
'I am, Sir, yr most humble servt,
'Vernon.'I am, Sir, your most humble servant,
'Vernon.'P.S.—If you can, pray doe mee ye favour to send mee by to-morrow at one of ye cloke, twenty shillings, to pay for wood, or I must sit wthoute fyer; yt will be ill for a person confined to the house.'"
'P.S.—If possible, could you please send me twenty shillings by tomorrow at one o'clock so I can buy some wood? Otherwise, I’ll have to sit without any fire; that won’t be good for someone stuck at home.'
It is not certain whether it is to "Mistris Kirke," Lady Vernon's mother, that Charles I. refers in his letter addressed to Colonel Whaley on the day of his escape from Hampton Court, November 11, 1647, but it is very likely to have been so. There was a Mistress (Anne) Kirke, sworn in a dresser to Queen Henrietta Maria in Easter week, 1637 (vide Strafford Papers, vol. ii. p. 73.), whose full-length portrait by Vandyke has been frequently engraved, by Browne, Garwood, Hollar, Beckett, &c.; and this lady may be the "Mrs. Anne Kirke, unfortunately drowned near London Bridge," who was buried in Westminster Abbey, July 9, 1641. {463}
It’s unclear if Charles I. is referring to "Mistress Kirke," Lady Vernon's mother, in his letter to Colonel Whaley on the day he escaped from Hampton Court, November 11, 1647, but it seems likely. There was a Mistress (Anne) Kirke, who was appointed as a dresser to Queen Henrietta Maria during Easter week, 1637 (see Strafford Papers, vol. ii. p. 73.), and her full-length portrait by Vandyke has been frequently reproduced by Browne, Garwood, Hollar, Beckett, etc.; this woman might be the "Mrs. Anne Kirke, who unfortunately drowned near London Bridge," and was buried in Westminster Abbey on July 9, 1641. {463}
In Westminster Abbey was buried, May 23, 1640, "Mr. Kirk's daughter." Captain George Kirke married there, February 10, 1699-1700, Mary Cooke. George Kirke, Esq., died Jan. 10, 1703-4, and was buried in the abbey cloisters (Mon. Inscr.); and Mrs. Mary Kirke died December 17, 1751, and was also buried there (M. I.). We may presume that all these Kirkes were of the same family.
In Westminster Abbey, "Mr. Kirk's daughter" was buried on May 23, 1640. Captain George Kirke married Mary Cooke there on February 10, 1699-1700. George Kirke, Esq., died on January 10, 1703-4, and was buried in the abbey cloisters (Mon. Inscr.); Mrs. Mary Kirke died on December 17, 1751, and was also buried there (M. I.). We can assume that all these Kirkes were from the same family.
Having now clearly released the annotator from all farther interference with Mary Kirke's private history, and having excluded her handsome face from any future illustrated edition of Grammont, I must leave him to deal with Miss Warmistre. It seems most probable that Dr. Thomas Warmistre, dean of Worcester, who died October 30, 1665, was her father, as he is known to have been a Royalist. His will, as it is not to be found at Doctors' Commons, must be sought for at Worcester. His brother Gervais was a married man, but his effects, unfortunately for our inquiries, were administered to at Doctors' Commons, August 31, 1641. That Warmistre was her right name is proved by Lord Cornbury's letter to the Duchess of Bedford, June 10, 1662 (Warburton's Rupert, vol. iii. pp. 461-464.). Her portrait is at Hengrave Hall, Suffolk, and has been engraved by Scriven for Carpenter's Grammont, 1811.
Having clearly released the annotator from any further interference with Mary Kirke's private life and excluded her attractive face from any future illustrated edition of Grammont, I’ll leave him to deal with Miss Warmistre. It seems most likely that Dr. Thomas Warmistre, dean of Worcester, who died on October 30, 1665, was her father, as he is known to have been a Royalist. His will, which can't be found at Doctors' Commons, must be looked for at Worcester. His brother Gervais was married, but his estate, unfortunately for our research, was administered at Doctors' Commons on August 31, 1641. That Warmistre was her actual name is confirmed by Lord Cornbury's letter to the Duchess of Bedford from June 10, 1662 (Warburton's Rupert, vol. iii. pp. 461-464). Her portrait is at Hengrave Hall, Suffolk, and was engraved by Scriven for Carpenter's Grammont, 1811.
Lord Cornbury's letter contradicts Grammont's statement, that Miss Boynton and Miss Wells came in on a removal, for they were of the original six maids of honour. Among these is named a Miss Price (Henrietta Maria), who we may suppose a sister to the Duchess of York's Miss Price, one of Grammont's most conspicuous heroines; and if so, when I come to speak of the Duchess's maids of honour, her parentage will be proved. Of Miss Carey, rejoicing in the prefix of Simona, the sixth of the queen's original maids of honour, we have no farther occasion to speak.
Lord Cornbury's letter contradicts Grammont's claim that Miss Boynton and Miss Wells joined during a removal, as they were part of the original six maids of honor. One of these maids is a Miss Price (Henrietta Maria), who we can assume is a sister to the Duchess of York's Miss Price, one of Grammont's most notable heroines. If that's the case, when I discuss the Duchess's maids of honor, her family background will be confirmed. As for Miss Carey, known as Simona, the sixth of the queen's original maids of honor, we don't need to discuss her further.
In 1669 the queen appears to have had four maids of honour only, the places vacated by Miss Stewart's and Miss Warmistre's marriages being unoccupied. This state of affairs leads me to doubt whether Miss Bellenden ever held the appointment. Mademoiselle Bardon, Grammont admits, was not actually a maid of honour, and Mademoiselle de la Garde certainly never was. Lord Braybrooke has suggested to me, with some show of reason, that the first may be the "Mrs. Baladine" who held a place of less emolument (that of dresser, probably) in the Duchess of York's household, and who left in the middle of the quarter, between Michaelmas and Christmas, 1662 (vide Household Book of James Duke of York at Audley End), as if she had the prudence "de quitter la cour avant que d'en être chassée."
In 1669, the queen only had four maids of honor, with the spots left vacant by Miss Stewart's and Miss Warmistre's marriages unfilled. This situation makes me question whether Miss Bellenden ever actually held the position. Mademoiselle Bardon, as Grammont acknowledges, wasn’t a maid of honor, and Mademoiselle de la Garde definitely wasn't. Lord Braybrooke has reasonably suggested that the first might be "Mrs. Baladine," who held a lesser position (probably as a dresser) in the Duchess of York's household and left midway through the quarter, between Michaelmas and Christmas, 1662 (see Household Book of James Duke of York at Audley End), as if she had the wisdom to "leave the court before being kicked out."
"La désagréable Bardon" may have been a daughter, or some other near relation, to Claudius Bardon, mentioned in the secret service expenses of Charles II.
"La désagréable Bardon" may have been a daughter or some other close relative of Claudius Bardon, who is mentioned in the secret service expenses of Charles II.
Mademoiselle de la Garde was appointed a dresser to the queen on her marriage (vide Lord Cornbury's letter), and continued in this office till 1673, when she died. Her father, Charles Peliott Baron de la Garde, or her brother, if she had one, was a groom of the privy chamber to Queen Catherine in 1687, and her mother dresser to the Duchess of York in 1662 (Duke of York's Household Book). Mary her sister, who became the wife of Sir Thomas Bond of Peckham, co. Surrey, Baronet, comptroller of the household to Queen Henrietta Maria, was a Lady of the privy chamber to the same queen.
Mademoiselle de la Garde was appointed as a dresser to the queen when she got married (see Lord Cornbury's letter) and held this position until her death in 1673. Her father, Charles Peliott Baron de la Garde, or her brother, if she had one, was a groom of the privy chamber to Queen Catherine in 1687, and her mother was a dresser to the Duchess of York in 1662 (Duke of York's Household Book). Her sister Mary, who married Sir Thomas Bond of Peckham, co. Surrey, Baronet, comptroller of the household to Queen Henrietta Maria, was a Lady of the privy chamber to the same queen.
Of mademoiselle I may add, that she married Mr. Gabriel Silvius, carver to the queen, in 1669 (compare first and second editions of Angliæ Notitia, 1669); and of her husband, in addition to the particulars already stated by the annotators, that he received the honour of knighthood January 28, 1669-70, married a second wife (a fact overlooked by the annotators, including Mr. Cunningham), viz. Anne, daughter of the Hon. William Howard, a younger son of Thomas first Earl of Berkshire, at Westminster Abbey, November 12, 1677, went the same year to the Hague as master of the household to the Prince of Orange (Evelyn), became privy purse to James II. (The British Compendium, or Rudiments of Honour), died at his house in Leicester Fields, January, 1696-7, and was buried in the church of St. Martin. It was his second wife, and widow, who died October 13, 1730.
Of mademoiselle, I can add that she married Mr. Gabriel Silvius, carver to the queen, in 1669 (see first and second editions of Angliæ Notitia, 1669); and regarding her husband, in addition to the details already mentioned by the annotators, he was honored with a knighthood on January 28, 1669-70, married a second wife (a fact overlooked by the annotators, including Mr. Cunningham), namely Anne, daughter of the Hon. William Howard, a younger son of Thomas, the first Earl of Berkshire, at Westminster Abbey on November 12, 1677. That same year, he went to the Hague as master of the household to the Prince of Orange (Evelyn), became privy purse to James II. (The British Compendium, or Rudiments of Honour), died at his home in Leicester Fields in January 1696-7, and was buried in the church of St. Martin. It was his second wife, and widow, who died on October 13, 1730.
If, as it is possible, Miss Bellenden did hold the appointment of maid of honour to the queen, she must have replaced Miss Stewart or Miss Warmistre; and if Miss Livingston and Miss Fielding held like appointments, one of the two must have replaced her, and they, again, must have removed from the court before 1669. I am not at present able to say who those three ladies were.
If, as seems likely, Miss Bellenden was appointed maid of honor to the queen, she must have taken the place of Miss Stewart or Miss Warmistre; and if Miss Livingston and Miss Fielding had similar positions, one of them must have replaced her, and then they must have left the court before 1669. Right now, I can’t say who those three ladies were.
Before bringing this paper to a conclusion, I must be permitted to refer Mr. Cunningham to five letters, written by Count de Comminges, the French ambassador in London, and printed Lord Braybrooke in his Appendix to Pepys, which Mr. C. has very unaccountably overlooked when settling the chronology of Grammont.
Before wrapping up this paper, I have to point Mr. Cunningham to five letters written by Count de Comminges, the French ambassador in London, which were printed by Lord Braybrooke in his Appendix to Pepys. Mr. C. has surprisingly overlooked these while establishing the timeline of Grammont.
The first, to M. de Lionne, dated "Londres, Janvier 5-15, 1662-3," announces the arrival of the Chevalier the day before "fort content de son voyage. Il a été ici reçu le plus agréablement au monde. Il est de toutes les parties du Roi." The second, to Louis XIV., dated "Décembre 10-20, 1663," informs the king of the chevalier's joy at being allowed to return to France, and of his intention to leave England in four days. He also informs Louis that he believes the chevalier will see the court of France in company of "une belle {464}Angloise." A postscript, dated "Décembre 20-24," says that the king of England, for certain stated reasons, has persuaded the chevalier to remain a day longer; and, farther, "Il laisse ici quelques autres dettes, qu'il prétend venir recueillir quand il se déclarera sur le sujet de Mille Hamilton, qui est si embrouillé que les plus clairvoyans n'y voyent goutte." The third, dated "Mai 19-24, 1664," is also to the King of France, and speaks of the Chevalier's wife, "madame sa femme." The next letter is addressed to M. de Lionne, and dated "Aout 29, Septembre 8, 1664." It contains this important intelligence: "Madam la Comtesse de Grammont accoucha hier au soir d'un fils beau comme la mère, et galant comme le père." The last letter, dated "Octobre 24, Novembre 3, 1664," and addressed to the same M. de Lionne, commences as follows: "Le Comte de Grammont est parti aujourd'hui avec sa femme."
The first letter, to M. de Lionne, dated "London, January 5-15, 1662-3," announces the arrival of the Chevalier the day before, "very pleased with his journey. He was received here in the most pleasant way possible. He is from all parts of the King." The second letter, to Louis XIV., dated "December 10-20, 1663," informs the king of the chevalier's happiness at being allowed to return to France and his plan to leave England in four days. He also tells Louis that he believes the chevalier will see the court of France in the company of "a beautiful Angloise." A postscript, dated "December 20-24," states that the king of England, for certain specified reasons, has persuaded the chevalier to stay one more day; furthermore, "He leaves behind some other debts, which he claims he will come to collect when he declares himself on the matter of Mille Hamilton, which is so tangled that even the most perceptive people can't make heads or tails of it." The third letter, dated "May 19-24, 1664," is also to the King of France and discusses the Chevalier's wife, "madame his wife." The next letter is addressed to M. de Lionne and is dated "August 29, September 8, 1664." It contains this important news: "Madam la Comtesse de Grammont gave birth last night to a son as beautiful as his mother and charming as his father." The last letter, dated "October 24, November 3, 1664," and addressed to M. de Lionne, begins as follows: "Count de Grammont left today with his wife."
These several letters, all important to the annotators of Grammont, give the precise dates of the chevalier's first visit to the Court of Charles II., and of his departure, and settle the date of his marriage within a few days. This event must have taken place in December, 1663. Mrs. Jameson and Mr. Cunningham place it in 1668.
These various letters, all significant to the annotators of Grammont, provide the exact dates of the chevalier's initial visit to the Court of Charles II, as well as his departure, and establish the date of his marriage within a few days. This event likely occurred in December 1663. Mrs. Jameson and Mr. Cunningham put it in 1668.
On another occasion I will return to this subject.
On another occasion, I will come back to this topic.
CHANGE OF MEANING IN PROVERBIAL EXPRESSIONS.
I entirely agree with G. K. (Vol. viii., p. 269.) respecting the original sense of "Putting a spoke in one's wheel." It surely meant to aid him in constructing the wheel, say of his fortune. As the true sense of this expression seems to have been retained in America when lost in its birthplace, so Ireland has retained that of another which has changed its sense here. By "finding a mare's nest" is, I believe, meant, fancying you have made a great discovery when in fact you have found nothing. I certainly remember the late Earl Grey using it in that sense in his place in parliament. But how does this accord with the following place in Beaumont and Fletcher?
I completely agree with G. K. (Vol. viii., p. 269.) about the original meaning of "Putting a spoke in one's wheel." It definitely meant to help someone in building their wheel, like in terms of their fortune. It seems that the actual meaning of this phrase has been preserved in America, even though it's been lost in its original home. Similarly, Ireland has kept the original meaning of another phrase that has changed here. By "finding a mare's nest," I believe it means thinking you've made a huge discovery when in reality you've found nothing. I certainly remember the late Earl Grey using it that way in parliament. But how does this relate to the following excerpt from Beaumont and Fletcher?
"Why dost thou laugh?
"Why are you laughing?"
What mare's nest hast thou found?"—Bonduca, Act V. Sc. 2.
What crazy situation have you discovered?"—Bonduca, Act V. Sc. 2.
on which, rather to my surprise, Mr. Dyce has no note. Now in Ireland, when a person is seen laughing immoderately without any apparent cause, it is usual to say, "O, he has found a mare's nest, and he's laughing at the eggs." This perfectly agrees with the above passage from Bonduca, and is doubtless the original sense and original form of the adage.
on which, to my surprise, Mr. Dyce has no commentary. Now in Ireland, when someone is seen laughing uncontrollably without any obvious reason, people usually say, "Oh, he’s found a mare’s nest, and he’s laughing at the eggs." This aligns perfectly with the above passage from Bonduca, and is definitely the original meaning and form of the saying.
There is another of these proverbial expressions which, I think, has also lost its pristine sense. By "Tread on a worm and it will turn" is usually meant that the very meekest and most helpless persons will, when harshly used, turn on their persecutors. But the poor worm does, and can do, no such thing. I therefore think that the adage arose at the time when worm was inclusive of snake and viper, and that what was meant was, that as those that had the power to avenge themselves when injured would use it, so people should be cautious how they provoked them. I am confirmed in this view by the following passage in the Wallenstein's Tod of Schiller, Act II. Sc. 6.:
There’s another one of these sayings that I think has lost its original meaning. “Tread on a worm and it will turn” is usually interpreted to mean that the most gentle and defenseless people will, when mistreated, react against their oppressors. But a poor worm doesn’t have the ability to do that. I believe the saying originated when worm included snakes and vipers, and what it really meant was that those who could defend themselves when harmed would take action, so people should be careful not to provoke them. I am further convinced of this by the following passage in Wallenstein's Tod by Schiller, Act II. Sc. 6.:
"Doch einen Stachel gab Natur dem Wurm,
"Doch einen Stachel gab Natur dem Wurm,
Dem Willkür übermüthig spielend tritt."
"Arrogantly playing with tyranny."
EXTRACTS FROM COLCHESTER CORPORATION RECORDS.
I inclose you some rather curious extracts from the corporation books of Colchester, which I made a few years since, during an investigation of some of the charities of that ancient borough.
I’m enclosing some interesting excerpts from the Colchester corporation books that I gathered a few years ago while researching some of the charities in that historic borough.
"The informacōn of Richard Glascock of Horden-of-the-Hill, in the County of Essex, Cordwayner, aged twenty-four yeeres or thereabouts, taken upon oath the 5th of June, 1651, before Jno. Furlie, Gent., Mayor of the Towne of Colchester.
"This is the statement of Richard Glascock of Horden-of-the-Hill, in Essex County, a Cordwainer, aged about twenty-four, given under oath on June 5, 1651, before Jno. Furlie, Gent., Mayor of the Town of Colchester."
"The Informant saieth, that upon the Lord's daie, the fower and twentieth daie of May last, that Wm Beard of Horden abovesaid, did cut off the taile of the catt of Thomas Burgis of Fanies Pishe, and Margaret, the wife of the sd Thos Burgis, after the catt's taile was cutt off, came home, and seeing that her catt's taile had bin cutt off she enquired who had done it, and being told that the sd Wm Beard had done it, she sd she would be even wth him before he went out of towne.
"The informant said that on Sunday, May 24, William Beard of Horden mentioned above cut off the tail of the cat owned by Thomas Burgis of Fanies Pishe. After the cat's tail was cut off, Margaret, the wife of Thomas Burgis, returned home and noticed that her cat's tail was missing. She asked who had done it, and when informed that it was William Beard, she declared she would get back at him before he left town."
"Richard Glascock."
"Richard Glascock."
"The informacōn of Hy Potter, aged twenty yeeres or thereabouts, of Horden abovesaid, Lynnen Weaver, taken upon oath the day and yeere abovesaid.
"This is the statement of Harry Potter, aged about twenty, of Horden mentioned above, a Linen Weaver, given under oath on the same day and year."
"This informant saieth, that ye sd fower and twentieth daie of May the taile of the catt of the sd Thomas Burgis being cutt off by the sd Wm Beard, and ye sd Margaret the wife of the sd Thos Burgis haveing bin told that the sd Wm Beard had done it, she prsentlie told the sd Beard she would be even with him before he went out of towne, and flewe in his face, and said she would give him something before he went out of her howse. And this informant saieing, Good woman, I hope you will give him noe poyson, and she replyed, he would not be soe foolish as to take any thinge of her, but she would be even wth him before he went out of towne."
"This informant states that on May 24, William Beard cut off the tail of Thomas Burgis’s cat, and Margaret, the wife of Thomas Burgis, was informed that William Beard was responsible. She immediately told Beard that she would take revenge before he left town and confronted him, saying she would give him something before he left her house. The informant, concerned, said, 'Good woman, I hope you won’t give him any poison,' to which she replied that he wouldn’t be foolish enough to take anything from her, but she would indeed get back at him before he left town."
"Henry Potter."
"Henry Potter."
"The informacōn of Rd Spencer, aged thirtie yeeres or thereabouts, Servant to Captn Thomas Caldwell, taken upon oath the day and yeere aforesaid.
"This is the statement of Rd Spencer, aged about thirty, a servant to Captain Thomas Caldwell, given under oath on the same day and year."
"This informant saieth, that the before-named Wm Beard being very sicke and in a strange distemper, and {465}haveing heard that Margaret, the wife of the before-named Thomas Burgis, had threatened him, did suspect the sd Wm Beard might be bewitched or ill dealt wth, did cut off some of his haire off from his head, and did wind it up together and put it into the fire, and could not for a good while make it burne, untill he tooke a candle and put under it or into it, and then wth much adoe it did burne, and after it was burnt ye sd Beard laie still, and before it was burnt he was in such a distemper that three men could hardlie hold him into his bed.
"This informant says that the aforementioned William Beard, being very sick and in a strange state, and having heard that Margaret, the wife of Thomas Burgis, had threatened him, suspected that William Beard might be bewitched or harmed. He cut off some of his hair, wrapped it up, and put it in the fire. For a long time, he couldn't get it to burn until he used a candle to place underneath it. After much effort, it finally caught fire. Once it was burned, Beard lay still, and before it was burned, he was in such distress that three men could hardly hold him down in his bed."
"Richard Spencer.
"his + mark.""Richard Spencer.
"his + mark."
CONVOCATION IN THE REIGN OF GEORGE II.
One hears it so often repeated, that Convocation was finally suppressed in 1717, in consequence of the accusations brought by the Lower House against Bishop Hoadley, that it seems worth while noting in correction of this, that though no licence from the Crown to make canons has ever been granted since that time, yet that Convocation met and sat in 1728, and again for some sessions in the spring of 1742, when several important subjects were brought before it; among which was the very interesting question of curates' stipends, in these words:
One hears it said so often that Convocation was finally shut down in 1717 due to the accusations made by the Lower House against Bishop Hoadley. It's worth noting, however, that although no license from the Crown to create canons has ever been granted since then, Convocation did meet and convene in 1728 and again for several sessions in the spring of 1742, during which several important topics were discussed; one of which was the very interesting issue of curates' salaries, phrased as follows:
"VIIth. That much reproach is brought upon the beneficed, and much oppression upon the unbeneficed, clergy, by curates accepting too scanty salaries from incumbents."
"VIIth. Many people blame clergy with benefices, and there's a lot of pressure on those without benefices, because curates accept very low salaries from their incumbents."
and which was really the last subject that was ever brought before Convocation. On Jan. 27, 1742, it was unanimously agreed, that "the motion made by the Archdeacon of Lincoln concerning ecclesiastical courts and clandestine marriages, the qualifications of persons to be admitted into holy orders, and the salaries and titles of curates," should be "reduced into writing, and the particulars offered to the House at their next assembly." But in the next session, on March 5, 1742, the Prolocutor, Dr. Lisle, was afraid to go on with the business before the House, and after "speaking much of a præmunire," and "echoing and reverberating the word from one side of good King Henry's Chapel to the other," the whole was let drop; and Convocation was fully consigned to the silence and the slumber of a century. The whole of these transactions are detailed in a scarce pamphlet, A Letter to the Rev. Dr. Lisle, Prolocutor of the Lower House, by the Archdeacon of Lincoln (the Venerable G. Reynolds).
and which was really the last topic ever discussed in Convocation. On January 27, 1742, it was unanimously agreed that "the motion made by the Archdeacon of Lincoln regarding ecclesiastical courts and secret marriages, the qualifications for people to be admitted into holy orders, and the salaries and titles of curates," should be "written down, and the details presented to the House at their next meeting." However, in the next session, on March 5, 1742, the Prolocutor, Dr. Lisle, was hesitant to proceed with the matter before the House, and after "talking a lot about a præmunire," and "bouncing the word back and forth from one side of good King Henry's Chapel to the other," it was completely dropped; and Convocation fell into silence and inactivity for a century. All these events are described in a rare pamphlet, A Letter to the Rev. Dr. Lisle, Prolocutor of the Lower House, by the Archdeacon of Lincoln (the Venerable G. Reynolds).
Tor-Mohun.
Tor-Mohun.
PARALLEL PASSAGES.
(Vol. iv., p. 435.; Vol. vi., p. 123.; Vol. vii., p. 151.)
(Vol. iv., p. 435.; Vol. vi., p. 123.; Vol. vii., p. 151.)
1. "When she had passed it seemed like the ceasing of exquisite music."—Longfellow's Evangeline, Part i. I.
1. "When she walked by, it felt like the beautiful music had stopped." — Longfellow's Evangeline, Part i. I.
"When she comes into the room, it is like a beautiful air of Mozart breaking upon you."—Thackeray "On a good-looking young Lady." (Quoted in Westminster Review, April 1853.)
"When she walks into the room, it’s like a beautiful melody by Mozart flowing over you." — Thackeray, "On a good-looking young Lady." (Quoted in Westminster Review, April 1853.)
2. "Two stars keep not their motion in one sphere."—Whence?
2. "Two stars don't stay in the same orbit." — Where's that from?
"We are the twin stars, and cannot shine in one sphere. When he rises I must set."—Congreve, Love for Love, Act III. Sc. 4.
"We are like twin stars, and we can’t shine in the same space. When he rises, I have to set." — Congreve, Love for Love, Act III. Sc. 4.
3. "Et ce n'est pas toujours par valeur et par chasteté que les hommes sont vaillants et que les femmes sont chastes."—De La Rochefoucauld, Max. I.
3. "And it's not always because of virtue and purity that men are brave and women are pure." — De La Rochefoucauld, Max. I.
"Yes, faith! I believe some women are virtuous, too; but 'tis as I believe some men are valiant, through fear."—Congreve, Love for Love, Act III. Sc. 14.
"Yes, indeed! I believe some women are good too; but it's like I believe some men are brave, out of fear." — Congreve, Love for Love, Act III. Sc. 14.
4. "Mais si les vaisseaux sillonnent un moment les ondes, la vague vient effacer aussitôt cette légère marque de servitude, et la mer reparait telle qu'elle fut au premier jour de la Création."—Corinne, b. I. ch. 4.
4. "But if the ships sail the waves for a moment, the wave quickly erases that slight mark of servitude, and the sea looks as it did on the first day of Creation." — Corinne, b. I. ch. 4.
"Such as Creation's dawn beheld, thou rollest now!"—Byron, Childe Harold.
"Just like at the dawn of Creation, you roll now!" — Byron, Childe Harold.
5. "Il est plus honteux de se méfier de ses amis que d'en être trompé."—De La Rochefoucauld, Max. LXXXIV.
5. "It's more shameful to distrust your friends than to be misled by them." — De La Rochefoucauld, Max. LXXXIV.
"Better trust all, and be deceived,
"Better to trust everyone and be let down,
And weep that trust, and that deceiving,
And cry over that trust and that betrayal,
Than doubt one heart that, if believed,
Than doubt one heart that, if believed,
Had blessed thy life with true believing!
Had blessed your life with true believing!
"Oh! in this mocking world, too fast
"Oh! in this mocking world, too fast
The doubting fiend o'ertakes our youth:
The questioning evil overtakes our youth:
Better be cheated to the last,
Better to be deceived to the end,
Than lose the blessed hope of truth!"—Mrs. Butler (Fanny Kemble).
Than lose the precious hope of truth!"—Mrs. Butler (Fanny Kemble).
6. In "N. & Q.," Vol. iv., p. 435., I cited, as a parallel to Shelley, the following from Southey's Doctor, vol. vi. p. 158.:
6. In "N. & Q.," Vol. iv., p. 435., I referenced, as a comparison to Shelley, the following from Southey's Doctor, vol. vi. p. 158.:
"The sense of flying in our sleep might, he thought, probably be the anticipation or forefeeling of an unevolved power, like an Aurelia's dream of butterfly motion."
"The sensation of flying in our dreams could, he believed, probably be a hint or sign of an undiscovered talent, much like an Aurelia's dream of a butterfly's movement."
In Spicer's Sights and Sounds (1853), p. 140., is to be found a poem professing to have been "dictated by the spirit of Robert Southey," on March 25, 1851, the fourth stanza of which runs as follows:
In Spicer's Sights and Sounds (1853), p. 140., there is a poem claimed to be "dictated by the spirit of Robert Southey," on March 25, 1851, the fourth stanza of which goes like this:
"The soul, like some sweet flower-bud yet unblown,
"The soul, like a sweet flower bud that hasn't bloomed yet,
Lay tranced in beauty in its silent cell:
Lay entranced in beauty in its quiet space:
The spirit slept, but dreamed of worlds unknown,
The spirit slept but dreamt of unknown worlds,
As dreams the chrysalis within its shell,
As dreams the cocoon within its shell,
Ere summer breathes its spell."
"Before summer casts its charm."
What inference should be drawn from this coincidence for or against the reality of the "spiritual dictation?"
What conclusion should we draw from this coincidence regarding the reality of "spiritual dictation?"
SHAKSPEARE CORRESPONDENCE.
Shakspeare's Works with a Digest of all the Readings (Vol. viii., pp. 74. 170. 362.).—I am exceedingly obliged to your correspondent Este for his suggestions, and need not say that any sincere advice will be most respectfully considered. In the second volume of my folio edition of Shakspeare, I am partially endeavouring to carry out the design to which he alludes, by giving a digest of all the readings up to the year 1684. How is it possible to carry out his wish farther with any advantage? I should feel particularly thankful for a satisfactory reply to the following questions in relation to this important subject:—1. As many copies of the first and other folio editions, as well as nearly all the copies of the same quarto editions, differ from each other, how are these differences to be treated? What copies are to be taken for texts, and how many copies of each are to be collated? 2. Are such books as Beckett, Jackson and others, to be examined? If not, are any conjectural emendations of the last and present centuries to be given? Where is the line to be drawn? A mere selection is valueless, or next to valueless; because, setting aside the differences in opinion in such matters, we want to know what conjectures are new, and which are old? 3. Are the various readings suggested in periodicals to be given? 4. Can any positive and practical rules be furnished, likely to render such an undertaking useful and successful?
Shakespeare's Works with a Digest of all the Readings (Vol. viii., pp. 74. 170. 362.).—I’m really grateful to your correspondent Este for his suggestions, and I don’t need to say that any genuine advice will be taken very seriously. In the second volume of my folio edition of Shakespeare, I’m partly trying to fulfill the idea he mentions by providing a digest of all the readings up to the year 1684. How can I further his wishes in a way that’s beneficial? I would be especially thankful for a clear response to the following questions regarding this important topic:—1. Since many copies of the first and other folio editions, as well as nearly all copies of the same quarto editions, differ from each other, how should these differences be handled? Which copies should be used as texts, and how many copies of each should be compared? 2. Should books like Beckett, Jackson, and others be examined? If not, should any conjectural changes from the last and present centuries be included? Where do we draw the line? A mere selection is nearly worthless because, aside from differing opinions in such matters, we need to know which conjectures are new and which are old. 3. Should the various readings suggested in periodicals be included? 4. Can any clear and practical guidelines be provided that would make this undertaking useful and successful?
Minor Notes.
Local Rhymes, Kent.—
Local Rhymes, Kent.—
"Between Wickham and Welling
"Between Wickham and Welling"
There's not an honest man dwelling;
There's not an honest guy living;
And I'll tell you the reason why,
And I'll explain why,
Because Shooters' Hill's so nigh."
Because Shooters' Hill is so close.
Unless this is preserved in "N. & Q." it will probably be forgotten with the highwaymen, whose proceedings at Shooters' Hill, no doubt, originated it.
Unless this is recorded in "N. & Q.," it will likely be forgotten along with the highwaymen, whose actions at Shooters' Hill probably sparked it.
Samuel Pepys's Grammar.—I have lately been looking over the Diary of this very clever person, and I confess it has surprised me to find him, a graduate of Cambridge, and, in fact, I may say a man of letters, constantly employing such vulgar bad grammar as "he do say," and such like. I am the more surprised when, on looking at his letters, even the familiar ones to his cousin Roger and to W. Hewer, I can find nothing of the kind, they being as grammatical and as well written as any of the time.
Samuel Pepys's Grammar.—I’ve recently been going through the Diary of this very intelligent individual, and I must admit I’m surprised to see him, a Cambridge graduate and a literary figure, constantly using such poor grammar as "he do say," and similar phrases. I’m even more astonished because, when I look at his letters, including the casual ones to his cousin Roger and to W. Hewer, I find no such mistakes; they are as grammatically correct and well-written as anything from that period.
My hypothesis is—Lord Braybrooke can correct me if I am wrong—that Pepys, writing his Diary in short-hand, used one and the same character for all the persons of the present tense of do, and that the decypherer did not attend to this circumstance. In his letter to Col. Legge (vol. v. p. 296.), Pepys writes "His R. H. does think," &c., which in the Diary would surely be "His R. H. do think," &c. In a similar way I would account for the use of come instead of came in the Diary, as there is nothing of the kind in the Letters. Should I be right, I may have rendered a slight service to the memory of an able and worthy man.
My hypothesis is—Lord Braybrooke can correct me if I'm wrong—that Pepys, writing his Diary in shorthand, used the same character for all present tense forms of do, and that the decoder didn't notice this. In his letter to Col. Legge (vol. v. p. 296.), Pepys writes "His R. H. does think," etc., which in the Diary would definitely be "His R. H. do think," etc. Similarly, I would explain the use of come instead of came in the Diary, as there's nothing like that in the Letters. If I'm right, I may have provided a small service to the memory of a capable and deserving man.
Roman Remains.—In Wright's Celt, Roman, and Saxon, p. 207., a curious Roman altar, dedicated to Silvanus, "ab aprum eximiæ forme captum," is mentioned as found at Durham. It was found in the wild district to the west, in the neighbourhood of Stanhope in Weardale, and is preserve in the rectory house there.
Roman Remains.—In Wright's Celt, Roman, and Saxon, p. 207, a fascinating Roman altar dedicated to Silvanus, described as "captured from an exceptional wild boar," is noted as having been discovered in Durham. It was found in the rugged area to the west, near Stanhope in Weardale, and is kept in the rectory house there.
P. 330., figure A. This armilla (?) was not found in Northumberland, but in Sussex, together with several others of the same form, a torques and celts.
P. 330., figure A. This armilla (?) wasn't found in Northumberland; it was discovered in Sussex, along with several others of the same type, a torques, and celts.
Wallington.
Wallington.
To grab.—A very popular writer has lately rightly denounced the use of this word as a vulgarism. Like many other monosyllables used by our working classes, it may plead antiquity in extenuation of its vulgarity. It has been derived from the Welsh word grabiaw, to grasp, and in ancient times was one of our "household words." The retention by a tailor of a portion of the cloth delivered to him, although it had been a usage from time immemorial, might have been considered by our forefathers as a grabbage: we now call it cabbage.
To grab.—A well-known writer has recently pointed out that using this word is considered tacky. Like many other short words used by working-class people, it can claim a long history as a defense against its crudeness. It comes from the Welsh word grabiaw, meaning to grasp, and in the past, it was one of our “household words.” The fact that a tailor kept some of the cloth that was given to him, although it had been a common practice for ages, might have been seen by our ancestors as grabbage: we now refer to it as cabbage.
Curfew at Sandwich.—Sometime back it was stated that the curfew at Sandwich had been discontinued. It has been resumed in consequence of the opposition made by the inhabitants. The same occurred about twenty years ago. (From information on the spot.)
Curfew at Sandwich.—A while ago, it was reported that the curfew in Sandwich had been canceled. It’s now back in place due to the resistance from the residents. The same thing happened about twenty years ago. (From information on the spot.)
Ecclesiastical Censure.—Ecclesiastical censure was often used in the Middle Ages to enforce civil rights, specially that of the exemption of the clergy from the judgment of a lay tribunal. The following instance thereof is new to me. I have copied it from "Collectanea Gervasii Holles," vol. i. p. 529., Lansdowne MS. 207., in the British Museum:
Ecclesiastical Censure.—Ecclesiastical censure was frequently used in the Middle Ages to uphold civil rights, especially the exemption of clergy from judgment by a secular court. The following example is new to me. I copied it from "Collectanea Gervasii Holles," vol. i. p. 529., Lansdowne MS. 207., in the British Museum:
"Ex Archis Linc. ao 1307.
"From the Archives of Lincoln, Year 1307."
"The Major and Burgesses of Grimesby hanged a Preist for theft called Richard of Notingham. Hereupon yē Bp sendes to yē Abbott of Wellow to associate to himselfe twelue adjacent chapleins to examine yē cause, and in St. James his Church Excommunicates all yt had any hand in it of whatsoever condition they were, yē King, Queen, and Prince of Wales excepted; {467}and yē Bp himselfe did Excommunicate them in yē Cathedral Church of Lincolne, yē fifth of yē Ides of Aprill following."
"The Mayor and Burgesses of Grimsby executed a priest named Richard of Nottingham for theft. In response, the Bishop instructed the Abbot of Wellow to gather twelve nearby chaplains to look into the issue, and in St. James's Church, he excommunicated everyone involved, regardless of their status, except for the King, Queen, and Prince of Wales; {467} and the Bishop himself excommunicated them in the Cathedral Church of Lincoln on the fifth day before the Ides of April that year."
Bottesford Moors, Kirton-in-Lindsey.
Bottesford Moors, Kirton-in-Lindsey.
The Natural History of Balmoral.—Dr. William Macgillivray, Professor of Civil and Natural History in the Marischal College of Aberdeen, and who died there Sept. 5, 1852, left an unpublished MS. on "The Natural History of Balmoral and its Neighbourhood." This work has been purchased from his executors by His Royal Highness Prince Albert; and is to be printed for the use of Her Majesty and the Royal Family, and for circulation among their august relatives. It was the last work on which the distinguished author was engaged, and was only completed a short time previous to his death. It also contains some curious speculations regarding several plants and herbs of that Alpine district, and their uses in a medicinal and domestic point of view, as known to the ancient Caledonians and Picts. Altogether it is a most interesting work.
The Natural History of Balmoral.—Dr. William Macgillivray, a Professor of Civil and Natural History at Marischal College in Aberdeen, who passed away there on September 5, 1852, left behind an unpublished manuscript on "The Natural History of Balmoral and its Neighborhood." This work has been bought from his executors by His Royal Highness Prince Albert and is set to be printed for the use of Her Majesty and the Royal Family, as well as for distribution among their esteemed relatives. It was the last project the distinguished author worked on, and it was finished just shortly before his death. It also includes some interesting thoughts about various plants and herbs from that Alpine region, and their uses in medicine and daily life, as understood by the ancient Caledonians and Picts. Overall, it is a very fascinating work.
Shirt Collars.—In Hone's Every-day Book, vol. ii. p. 381., I find the following, which I think is after the present ridiculous fashion of wearing shirt collars, viz. so tight round the neck, and so stiff, that it is a wonder there are not some serious accidents.
Shirt Collars.—In Hone's Every-day Book, vol. ii. p. 381., I see the following, which I think reflects today's ridiculous trend of wearing shirt collars, that are so tight around the neck and so stiff, that it's a wonder there aren't some serious accidents.
These collars, at present worn by the fast young men of the day, are called "The Piccadilly three-folds." Now, if this goes on until they get to a "nail in depth, and stiffened with yellow starch, and double wired," I think it will only be proper to put a heavy tax upon them.
These collars, currently worn by the trendy young men of today, are called "The Piccadilly three-folds." If this trend continues until they reach a "nail in depth, and stiffened with yellow starch, and double wired," I think it would be reasonable to impose a heavy tax on them.
"Piccadilly.—The picadil was the round hem, or the piece set about the edge or skirt of a garment, whether at top or bottom; also a kind of stiff collar, made in fashion of a band, that went about the neck and round about the shoulders: hence the term 'wooden piccadilloes' (meaning the pillory) in Hudibras; and see Nares' Glossary, and Blount's Glossographia. At the time that ruffs and picadils were much in fashion, there was a celebrated ordinary near St. James's, called Piccadilly: because, as some say, it was the outmost, or skirt-house, situate at the hem of the town: but it more probably took its name from one Higgins, a tailor, who made a fortune by picadils, and built this with a few adjoining houses. The name has by a few been derived from a much frequented shop for the sale of these articles; this probably took its rise from the circumstance of Higgins having built houses there, which however were not for selling ruffs; and indeed, with the exception of his buildings, the site of the present Piccadilly was at that time open country, and quite out of the way of trade. At a later period, when Burlington House was built, its noble owner chose the situation, then at some distance from the extremity of the town, that none might build beyond him. The ruffs formerly worn by gentlemen were frequently double wired, and stiffened with yellow starch: and the practice was at one time carried to such an excess, that they were limited by Queen Elizabeth 'to a nayle of a yeard in depth.' In the time of James I., they still continued of a preposterous size: so that, previous to the visit made by that monarch to Cambridge in 1615, the Vice-chancellor of the University thought fit to issue an order, prohibiting 'the fearful enormity and excess of apparel seen in all degrees, as, namely, strange piccadilloes, vast bands, huge cuffs, shoe roses, tufts, locks, and tops of hair, unbeseeming that modesty and carriage of students in so renowned a university.'"
"Piccadilly.—The picadil was the rounded edge or trim of a garment, found at the top or bottom; it was also a type of stiff collar designed like a band that wrapped around the neck and shoulders. This is where the term 'wooden piccadilloes' comes from (referring to the pillory) in Hudibras; see Nares' Glossary and Blount's Glossographia. When ruffs and picadils were in fashion, there was a well-known inn near St. James's called Piccadilly: it's said to be named because it was on the outskirts of town; however, it's more likely that it was named after a tailor named Higgins, who made a fortune selling picadils and built this inn along with some nearby houses. Some people think the name came from a popular shop selling these items; this probably started because Higgins constructed houses there, which weren't intended for selling ruffs. In fact, aside from his buildings, the area that is now Piccadilly was just open countryside at that time and not really a commercial area. Later, when Burlington House was built, its noble owner chose the location, which was at a good distance from the edge of the town, so that none might build beyond him. The ruffs that gentlemen wore back then were often double wired and stiffened with yellow starch: at one point, the practice got so out of hand that Queen Elizabeth limited their size 'to a nail of a yard in depth. ' During the time of James I, they still remained excessively large: before the monarch visited Cambridge in 1615, the Vice-chancellor of the University felt it necessary to issue an order against 'the fearful enormity and excess of apparel seen in all ranks, such as strange piccadilloes, vast bands, huge cuffs, shoe roses, tufts, locks, and tops of hair, which were unbecoming of the modesty and demeanor expected of students in such a prestigious university.'
It is scarcely to be supposed that the ladies were deficient in the size of their ruffs, &c.
It’s hard to believe that the ladies were lacking in the size of their ruffs, etc.
I must conclude this in the words of the immortal poet:
I have to wrap this up with the words of the timeless poet:
" . . . . New fashions,
" . . . . New trends,
Though they be never so ridiculous,
Though they may be incredibly ridiculous,
Nay, let them be unmanly, yet are followed."
Nay, let them be unmanly, yet are followed.
Queries.
"DAYS OF MY YOUTH."
The following lines are understood to have been written by the late Mr. St. George Tucker of Virginia, U. S. Any information in support of this opinion, or, if it be unfounded, in disproof of it, is requested by
The following lines are believed to have been written by the late Mr. St. George Tucker of Virginia, U.S. Any information that supports this belief, or, if it’s incorrect, any evidence that disproves it, is requested by
DAYS OF MY YOUTH.
YOUTHFUL DAYS.
Days of my youth! ye have glided away,
Days of my youth! You have slipped away,
Hairs of my youth! ye are frosted and gray;
Hairs of my youth! you are frosted and gray;
Eyes of my youth! your keen sight is no more;
Eyes of my youth! your sharp vision is gone;
Cheeks of my youth! ye are furrow'd all o'er;
Cheeks of my youth! You are all wrinkled now;
Strength of my youth! all your vigour is gone;
Strength of my youth! all your energy is gone;
Thoughts of my youth! all your visions are flown!
Thoughts of my youth! All your visions have vanished!
Days of my youth! I wish not your recall,
Days of my youth! I don’t wish to remember you,
Hairs of my youth! I'm content you should fall;
Hairs of my youth! I'm glad you should fall;
Eyes of my youth! ye much evil have seen;
Eyes of my youth! you’ve seen a lot of bad things;
Cheeks of my youth! bathed in tears have you been;
Cheeks of my youth! bathed in tears have you been;
Thoughts of my youth! ye have led me astray;
Thoughts of my youth! You have misled me;
Strength of my youth! why lament your decay!
Strength of my youth! Why mourn your decline!
Days of my age! ye will shortly be past;
Days of my age! You will soon be gone;
Pains of my age! yet awhile can ye last;
Pains of my age! But they can only last a little longer;
Joys of my age! in true wisdom delight;
Joys of my time! in true wisdom enjoy;
Eyes of my age! be religion your light;
Eyes of my time! let religion be your light;
Thoughts of my age! dread not the cold sod,
Thoughts of my age! Don't fear the cold ground,
Hopes of my age! be ye fix'd on your God!—St. George Tucker, Judge.
Hopes of my generation! Keep your focus on God!—St. George Tucker, Judge.
Minor Queries.
Randall Minshull and his Cheshire Collections.—Of what family was Randall Minshull, who, in the Addenda to Gower's Sketch for a History of {468}Cheshire, p. 94., is stated to have professedly made a collection for the Antiquities of Cheshire by the desire of Lord Malpas? and where is such collection at the present time to met with?
Randall Minshull and his Cheshire Collections.—What family did Randall Minshull belong to, who, in the Addenda to Gower's Sketch for a History of {468}Cheshire, p. 94., is noted to have made a collection for the Antiquities of Cheshire at the request of Lord Malpas? And where can that collection be found today?
Mackey's "Theory of the Earth."—I have a small pamphlet entitled,
Mackey's "Theory of the Earth."—I have a small pamphlet entitled,
"A New Theory of the Earth and of Planetary Motion; in which it is demonstrated that the Sun is Vicegerent of his own System. By Sampson Arnold Mackey, author of Mythological Astronomy and Urania's Key to the Revelations, &c. Norwich, printed for the Author."
"A New Theory of the Earth and Planetary Motion; demonstrating that the Sun represents its own System. By Sampson Arnold Mackey, author of Mythological Astronomy and Urania's Key to the Revelations, & etc. Norwich, printed for the Author."
There is no date on the title-page, but a notice on the second page indicates 1825. The book is extraordinary, and shows great astronomical and philological attainments, with some startling facts in geology, and bold theories as to the formation of the earth. I have endeavoured to procure the other two works of which Mr. Mackey is said to be the author, and also some account of him, but without success. I can hardly suppose that a writer of so much ability and learning can be unknown, and shall feel much obliged by any information as to him or his writings.
There’s no date on the title page, but a notice on the second page says 1825. The book is amazing and shows impressive knowledge in astronomy and linguistics, along with some surprising facts in geology and bold theories about how the earth was formed. I’ve tried to get the other two works that Mr. Mackey is said to have authored, as well as some information about him, but I haven’t had any luck. I can hardly believe that a writer with such talent and knowledge could be unknown, and I would really appreciate any information about him or his writings.
Coventry.
Coventry.
Birthplace of King Edward V.—Can you give me any information as to the exact birthplace of this monarch?
Birthplace of King Edward V.—Can you provide me with details about the exact location where this king was born?
Hume (vol. ii. p. 430.) merely says that he was born while his mother was in sanctuary in London, and his father was a fugitive from the victorious Earl of Warwick.
Hume (vol. ii. p. 430.) just states that he was born while his mother was in sanctuary in London, and his father was running away from the victorious Earl of Warwick.
Commynes (book iii. chap. 5.) also says that she took refuge "es franchises qui sont à Londres," and "y accoucha d'ung filz en grant povreté."
Commynes (book iii. chap. 5.) also says that she took refuge "in the freedoms that are in London," and "gave birth to a son there in great poverty."
Chastellain, at p. 486. of his Chronique, says: "Elle alla à Saincte-Catherine, une abbeye, disoient aucuns: aucuns autres disoient à Vasemonstre (Westminster), lieu de franchise, qui oncques n'avoit esté corrompu."
Chastellain, on p. 486 of his Chronique, says: "She went to St. Catherine, an abbey, some said; others said to Westminster, a place of freedom, which had never been corrupted."
I should be glad to have some more definite information on this point, if any of your readers can supply it.
I would appreciate any more specific information on this topic if any of your readers can provide it.
Name of Infants.—In Scotland there is a superstition that it is unlucky to tell the name of infants before they are christened. Can this be explained?
Name of Infants.—In Scotland, there's a belief that it's bad luck to reveal the names of babies before they are baptized. What's the reason behind this?
Geometrical Curiosity.—Take half a sheet of note-paper; fold and crease it so that two opposite corners exactly meet; then fold and crease it so that the remaining two opposite corners exactly meet. Armed with a fine pair of scissors, proceed now to repeat both these folds alternately without cessation, taking care to cut off quite flush and clear all the overlappings on both sides after each fold. When these overlappings become too small to be cut off, the paper is in the shape of a circle, i. e. the ultimate intersection of an infinite series of tangents. Perhaps Professor De Morgan will give the rationale of this procedure.
Geometrical Curiosity.—Take half a sheet of note paper; fold and crease it so that two opposite corners meet perfectly; then fold and crease it again so that the other two opposite corners meet perfectly. With a sharp pair of scissors, now proceed to alternate these folds continuously, making sure to cut off any overlapping edges on both sides after each fold. When these overlaps become too small to cut off, the paper is in the shape of a circle, i.e. the final intersection of an infinite number of tangents. Maybe Prof. De Morgan will explain the rationale behind this process.
Birmingham.
Birmingham.
Denison Family.—Can any correspondent of "N. & Q." inform me how the Denisons of Denbies, near Dorking, in Surrey, and the Denisons of Ossington, in Nottinghamshire, were related? Who was Mr. Robert Denison of Nottingham, who took a very active part in politics at the commencement of the French Revolution? His wife had a handsome legacy from a rich old lady, one Mrs. Williams, of whom I would much like to know something farther.
Denison Family.—Can any reader of "N. & Q." inform me how the Denisons of Denbies, near Dorking in Surrey, and the Denisons of Ossington in Nottinghamshire are related? Who was Mr. Robert Denison of Nottingham, who was very active in politics at the start of the French Revolution? His wife received a generous inheritance from a wealthy elderly woman, Mrs. Williams, and I would like to know more about her.
"Came."—In Pegge's Anecdotes of the English Language, p. 189., we read:
"Came."—In Pegge's Anecdotes of the English Language, p. 189., we read:
"The real preterit of the Saxon verb coman, is com. Came is therefore a violent infringement, though it is impossible to detect the innovator, or any of his accomplices."
"The actual past tense of the Saxon verb coman is com. Came is thus a major change, but it's impossible to pinpoint the innovator or any of their collaborators."
When was the word came introduced into our language? Early instances of its use would be very welcome.
When was the word came added to our language? Early examples of its usage would be greatly appreciated.
Hull.
Hull.
Montmartre.—By some this name is derived from mons martis; by others from mons martyrum. Which is the more satisfactory etymology, and upon what authority does it rest?
Montmartre.—Some people think this name comes from mons martis; others believe it comes from mons martyrum. Which explanation is more convincing, and what supports it?
St. Lucia.
St. Lucia.
Law of Copyright: British Museum.—Observing that the new law of copyright, which was passed and came into operation on the 1st of July, 1842, expressly repeals all of the statutes previously existing on that subject, I am anxious to know, through the medium of "N. & Q.," if the British Museum authorities can claim and enforce the delivery of any book, although not entered on the books of Stationers' Hall, which may have been printed and published before the passing of the said act of 1842. If so, then what is the state of the act or statute which bears upon that particular privilege?
Law of Copyright: British Museum.—Noting that the new copyright law, which was enacted and came into effect on July 1, 1842, clearly cancels all previous statutes on this matter, I'm eager to find out, through "N. & Q.," whether the British Museum authorities can demand and enforce the delivery of any book, even if it’s not listed in the Stationers' Hall, that was printed and published before the enactment of the 1842 act. If that’s the case, what is the current status of the act or statute that pertains to that specific privilege?
Glasgow.
Glasgow.
Veneration for the Oak.—The oak—"the brave old oak"—has been an object of veneration in this country from the primæval to the present times. The term oak is used in several places in Scripture, but nowhere does it appear to refer to the oak as we know it—our indigenous oak. The oak, under which God appeared to Abraham, bears apparently a resemblance to the tree of life of the Assyrian sculptures; and, perhaps, the Zoroastrian {469}Homa, or sacred tree, and the sacred tree of the Hindus; and the same may yet be found in the British oak. Is there a botanical affinity between these trees? Are they all oaks? Was the tree of life, as described in the Bible, an oak?
Respect for the Oak.—The oak—"the brave old oak"—has been revered in this country from ancient times to the present. The term oak appears in several places in the Bible, but it never seems to refer to the oak as we know it—our native oak. The oak under which God appeared to Abraham seems to resemble the tree of life depicted in Assyrian sculptures; and perhaps it is similar to the Zoroastrian {469}Homa, or sacred tree, and the sacred tree of the Hindus; and we might find the same in the British oak. Is there a botanical connection between these trees? Are they all oaks? Was the tree of life, as described in the Bible, an oak?
Stansted, Montfichet.
Stansted, Montfichet.
Father Matthew's Chickens.—Can any of your correspondents explain why grouse in Scotland are sometimes called "Father Matthew's chickens?"
Father Matthew's Chickens.—Can any of your readers explain why grouse in Scotland are sometimes referred to as "Father Matthew's chickens?"
Pronunciation of Bible and Prayer Book proper Names.—I feel sure that many of your clerical correspondents would feel much obliged by any assistance that might be forwarded them through the medium of your columns respecting the correct pronunciation of those proper names which occur during divine service: such as Sabaoth, Moriah, Aceldama, Sabacthani, Abednego, and several others of the same class.—The opinions already given in publications are so contradictory, that I have been induced to ask you to insert this Query.
Pronunciation of Bible and Prayer Book proper Names.—I’m sure that many of your clerical correspondents would greatly appreciate any help you could provide through your columns regarding the correct pronunciation of the proper names that come up during divine service: names like Sabaoth, Moriah, Aceldama, Sabacthani, Abednego, and several others like them. The opinions already published are so contradictory that I felt compelled to ask you to include this Query.
Cornworthy Vicarage, Totnes.
Cornworthy Vicarage, Totnes.
MSS. of Anthony Bave.—I possess a volume of MS. Sermons, Treatises, and Memorandums in the autograph of one Anthony Bave, who appears, from the doctrines broached therein, to have been a moderate Puritan. What is known concerning him? It is a book I value much from the beauty of the writing and the vigorous style of the discourses.
MSS. of Anthony Bave.—I have a volume of manuscript sermons, treatises, and notes in the handwriting of one Anthony Bave, who seems, based on the ideas presented, to have been a moderate Puritan. What do we know about him? This is a book I highly value for the beauty of the writing and the strong style of the speeches.
Kidderminster.
Kidderminster.
Return of Gentry, temp. Hen. VI.—In what collection, or where, can the Return of Gentry of England 12th Henry VI. be seen or met with?
Return of Gentry, temp. Hen. VI.—In which collection or where can the Return of Gentry of England from the 12th year of Henry VI be found?
Taylor's "Holy Living."—In Pickering's edition of this work (London, 1848), some of the quotations are placed in square brackets (e. g. on p. xii.); and some of the paragraphs have an asterisk prefixed to them (as on p. 8.). Why?
Taylor's "Holy Living."—In Pickering's 1848 edition of this work (London), some of the quotes are in square brackets (e. g. on p. xii.); and some of the paragraphs have an asterisk in front of them (as on p. 8.). Why?
Captain Jan Dimmeson.—Can any one give me some information about him? I find his name on a pane of glass, with the date of 1667, in the vicinity of Windsor. I had not an opportunity to obtain a copy of some words that were painted on the glass, beneath a fine flowing sea with a ship in full sail upon its bosom.
Captain Jan Dimmeson.—Can anyone give me some information about him? I found his name on a pane of glass, dated 1667, near Windsor. I didn’t get a chance to grab a copy of the words that were painted on the glass, below a beautifully flowing sea with a ship sailing fully on its surface.
Greek and Roman Fortification.—Where can I obtain an account of Greek and Roman fortification? I am surprised to find that Smith's Classical Dictionary has no article upon that subject.
Greek and Roman Fortification.—Where can I find information on Greek and Roman fortification? I’m surprised to see that Smith's Classical Dictionary doesn’t have an entry on that topic.
The Queen at Chess.—In the old titles of the men at chess, the queen, who does all the hard work, was called the prime minister, or grand vizier. When did the change take place, and who thought of giving all the power to a woman? Truly in the game "woman is the head of the man," reversing the just order.
The Queen at Chess.—In the earlier titles used for chess pieces, the queen, who does all the tough work, was referred to as the prime minister or grand vizier. When did this change happen, and who decided to give all the power to a woman? Truly in the game, "the woman is the head of the man," flipping the natural order.
Vida on Chess.—I have had in my possession for more than five years a translation of Vida on Chess. It is in the handwriting of a celebrated poet of the last century; but whether a mere transcript or a version of his own, is more than I can affirm. Now, I shall feel obliged by any information on the subject, whether positive or negative, and transcribe the exordium with that view. It is not the version which was made by George Jeffreys, and revised by Alexander Pope[1]:
Vida on Chess.—I have had a translation of Vida on Chess for over five years. It's in the handwriting of a famous poet from the last century, but I can't confirm whether it's just a copy or his own version. I would appreciate any information on this topic, whether it's affirmative or negative, so I’m sharing the beginning with that in mind. This is not the version created by George Jeffreys and revised by Alexander Pope [1]:
"Vida's Scacchis, or Chess."
"Vida's Chess."
"Armies of box that sportively engage,
"Groups of boxes that playfully interact,
And mimick real battels in their rage,
And mimic real battles in their rage,
Pleas'd I recount; how smit with glory's charms,
Pleased I remember how captivated by the allure of glory,
Two mighty monarchs met in adverse arms,
Two powerful kings faced off in battle,
Sable and white: assist me to explore,
Sable and white: help me to explore,
Ye Serian nymphs, what ne'er was sung before."
Ye Serian nymphs, what has never been sung before.
Minor Queries with Answers.
Thornton Abbey.—Can any of your readers give me some information respecting an old and ruinous building called "Thornton Abbey," situate about ten miles from Grimsby, Lincolnshire, and also about two miles from the river Humber?
Thornton Abbey.—Can any of your readers provide me with information about an old, ruined building known as "Thornton Abbey," located about ten miles from Grimsby, Lincolnshire, and around two miles from the Humber River?
Grimsby.
Grimsby.
[Tanner states, the house was called Thorneton Curteis, and Torrington. It was founded by William le Gros, Earl of Albemarle, and Lord of Holderness, about the year 1139, for Austin Canons, and was dedicated to the Virgin Mary. Dugdale says, that when first founded it was a priory, and the monks were introduced from the monastery of Kirkham; but was changed into an abbey by Pope Eugenius III., A.D. 1148. Though Henry VIII. suppressed the Abbey, he reserved the greater part of the lands to endow a college, which he erected in its room, for a dean and prebendaries, to the honour of the Holy and Undivided Trinity. From the remains it must have been a magnificent building. Originally it consisted of an extensive quadrangle, surrounded by a deep ditch, with high ramparts, and built in a style adapted for occasional defence. To the east of the gateway are the remains of the abbey church. The chapter-house, part of which is standing, was of an octangular shape, and highly decorated. On the south of the ruins of the church is a building, now occupied as a farm-house, which formerly was the residence of the abbots. It was afterwards the seat of Edward {470}Skinner, Esq., who married Ann, daughter of Sir William Wentworth, brother to the unfortunate Earl of Strafford. The estate was purchased from one of the Skinner family by Sir Richard Sutton, Bart.; it is now in the possession of Lord Yarborough. In taking down a wall in the ruins of the abbey, a human skeleton was found, with a table, a book, and a candle-stick. It is supposed to have been the remains of the fourteenth abbot, who, it is stated, was for some crime sentenced to be immured—a mode of capital punishment not uncommon in monasteries. Four views of the abbey are given in Allen's History of Lincolnshire, vol ii., and some farther notices of its ancient state will be found in Dugdale's Monasticon, vol. vi. pl. i. p. 324.; Tanner's Notitia, Lincolnshire, lxxvii.; and Beauties of England and Wales, vol. ix. p. 684.]
[Tanner mentions that the house was called Thorneton Curteis and Torrington. It was established by William le Gros, Earl of Albemarle, and Lord of Holderness, around the year 1139, for Augustinian Canons, and was dedicated to the Virgin Mary. Dugdale states that it was originally founded as a priory, with monks brought in from the monastery of Kirkham; however, it was converted into an abbey by Pope Eugenius III. in 1148. Although Henry VIII. dissolved the Abbey, he kept most of the lands to fund a college he established in its place, for a dean and prebendaries, in honor of the Holy and Undivided Trinity. From what remains, it must have been an impressive building. It originally featured a large quadrangle surrounded by a deep moat, with high walls designed for occasional defense. East of the gateway are the remains of the abbey church. The chapter house, which still partially stands, was octagonal and richly decorated. To the south of the church ruins is a building currently used as a farmhouse, which was formerly the residence of the abbots. It later became the home of Edward Skinner, Esq., who married Ann, the daughter of Sir William Wentworth, brother of the unfortunate Earl of Strafford. The estate was bought from one of the Skinner family by Sir Richard Sutton, Bart.; it is now owned by Lord Yarborough. During the demolition of a wall in the abbey ruins, a human skeleton was discovered, along with a table, a book, and a candlestick. It is believed to have belonged to the fourteenth abbot, who was reportedly sentenced to be immured for some crime— a form of capital punishment that was not uncommon in monasteries. Four views of the abbey are included in Allen's History of Lincolnshire, vol. ii., and further details about its ancient condition can be found in Dugdale's Monasticon, vol. vi. pl. i. p. 324; Tanner's Notitia, Lincolnshire, lxxvii.; and Beauties of England and Wales, vol. ix. p. 684.]
Bishop Wilson's "Sacra Privata."—In the new edition of this work, p. 381., there is given a table of "The Collects, with their Tendencies." Under the head of Fasting, references are made to the First Sunday in Lent, and the Tenth and Twenty-third after Trinity.—There must be some mistake in this, as the last two collects refer to prayer. This for your correspondent Mr. Denton, to whom I understand the Church is indebted for the redintegration of the good bishop's journal.
Bishop Wilson's "Sacra Privata."—In the new edition of this work, p. 381, there's a table of "The Collects, with their Tendencies." Under the category of Fasting, references are made to the First Sunday in Lent, and the Tenth and Twenty-third after Trinity.—There must be some error here, as the last two collects pertain to prayer. This is for your correspondent Mr. Denton, who I understand is credited with restoring the good bishop's journal.
[We have submitted the above to the Rev. William Denton, who expresses his obligations to A. A. D. for pointing out the error, which seems to have escaped the notice of all the previous editors of the Sacra Privata. The second edition is now at press, and, if not too late, the correction will be made. Mr. Denton doubts whether the list after all is the bishop's; but thinks it was only copied by him from some work. Can any one point out the source? It is singular that another mistake of the bishop's should have escaped the notice of all previous editors, namely, the tendency of the collect for Whit-Sunday being described as Humiliation instead of Illumination.]
[We have sent the above to the Rev. William Denton, who thanks A. A. D. for highlighting the error that seems to have been missed by all the previous editors of the Sacra Privata. The second edition is now in press, and, if it's not too late, the correction will be made. Mr. Denton is unsure whether the list is really the bishop's; he thinks it might just be something he copied from another source. Can anyone identify where it came from? It's unusual that another mistake by the bishop has gone unnoticed by all previous editors, specifically, the collect for Whit-Sunday being referred to as Humiliation instead of Illumination.]
Derivation of "Chemistry."—Are there any historical reasons for deriving the word chemistry from Chemi, the name of Egypt, as is done by Bunsen and others?
Derivation of "Chemistry."—Are there any historical reasons for deriving the word chemistry from Chemi, the name of Egypt, as suggested by Bunsen and others?
[Dr. Thomson, the writer of the article "Chemistry" in the Encyclopædia Britannica, thus notices this derivation: "The generally received opinion among alchymistical writers was, that chemistry originated in Egypt; and the honour of the invention has been unanimously conferred on Hermes Trismegistus. He is by some supposed to be the same person with Chanaan, the son of Ham, whose son Mizraim first occupied and peopled Egypt. Plutarch informs us that Egypt was sometimes called Chemia: this name is supposed to be derived from Chanaan. Hence it was inferred that Chanaan was the inventor of chemistry, to which he affixed his own name. Whether the Hermes of the Greeks was Chanaan, or his son Mizraim, it is impossible to decide; but to Hermes is assigned the invention of chemistry, or the art of making gold, by almost the unanimous consent of the adepts." Dr. Webster says, "The orthography of this word has undergone changes through a mere ignorance of its origin, than which nothing can be more obvious. It is the Arabic kimia, the occult art or science, from kamai, to conceal. This was originally the art or science now called alchemy; the art of converting baser metals into gold." Webster says the correct orthography is chimistry.]
[Dr. Thomson, the author of the article "Chemistry" in the Encyclopædia Britannica, notes this origin: "The widely accepted belief among alchemical writers was that chemistry began in Egypt, and the credit for its invention has been unanimously given to Hermes Trismegistus. Some believe he is the same person as Chanaan, the son of Ham, whose son Mizraim first settled and populated Egypt. Plutarch tells us that Egypt was sometimes called Chemia: this name is believed to come from Chanaan. From this, it was concluded that Chanaan was the inventor of chemistry, to which he attached his own name. Whether the Hermes of the Greeks was Chanaan or his son Mizraim is impossible to determine; however, Hermes is credited with the invention of chemistry, or the art of making gold, by almost universal agreement among the experts." Dr. Webster states, "The spelling of this word has changed due to a simple misunderstanding of its origin, which is quite obvious. It is derived from the Arabic kimia, meaning the hidden art or science, from kamai, to conceal. This was originally the art or science now known as alchemy; the art of turning base metals into gold." Webster claims the correct spelling is chimistry.]
Burning for Witchcraft.—When and where was the last person burned to death for witchcraft in England?
Burning for Witchcraft.—When and where was the last person executed by burning for witchcraft in England?
[We believe the last case of burning for witchcraft was at Bury St. Edmunds in 1664, tried by Sir Matthew Hale, although some accounts state that the victims, Amy Duny and Rose Callender, were executed. In the same year Alice Hudson was burnt at York for having received 10s. at a time from his Satanic majesty. The last case of burning in Scotland was in Sutherland, A.D. 1722: the judge was Captain David Ross, of Little Dean. At Glarus, in Ireland, a servant girl was burnt so late as 1786. The last authenticated instance of the swimming ordeal occurred in 1785, and is quoted by Mr. Sternberg from a Northampton Mercury of that year:—"A poor woman named Sarah Bradshaw, of Mears Ashby, who was accused of being a witch, in order to prove her innocence, submitted to the ignominy of being dipped, when she immediately sunk to the bottom of the pond, which was deemed to be an incontestable proof that she was no witch!"]
[We think the last case of burning for witchcraft happened in Bury St. Edmunds in 1664, tried by Sir Matthew Hale, although some reports say that the victims, Amy Duny and Rose Callender, were executed. In the same year, Alice Hudson was burned at York for having received 10s. at a time from his Satanic majesty. The last case of burning in Scotland took place in Sutherland, CE 1722: the judge was Captain David Ross, of Little Dean. In Glarus, Ireland, a servant girl was burned as recently as 1786. The last confirmed instance of the swimming ordeal happened in 1785, cited by Mr. Sternberg from a Northampton Mercury of that year:—"A poor woman named Sarah Bradshaw, of Mears Ashby, who was accused of being a witch, in order to prove her innocence, submitted to the shame of being dipped, when she immediately sank to the bottom of the pond, which was seen as undeniable proof that she was not a witch!"]
The Small City Companies.—Where does the fullest information appear respecting their early condition, &c.? Herbert's work only occasionally refers to them, and I am aware of many incidental notices of them in Histories of London, &c.; but it does not amount to much, and I should be glad to know if there is no fuller account of them. The companies of Pewterers or Bakers, for example.
The Small City Companies.—Where can I find detailed information about their early status, etc.? Herbert's work only mentions them here and there, and I've come across some brief references in histories of London, etc.; but it doesn't provide much depth, and I would appreciate knowing if there's a more comprehensive account of them, like the companies of Pewterers or Bakers, for instance.
[Beside the incidental notices to be found in Stow, Maitland, and Seymour, our correspondent must consult the Harleian MSS.; and if he will turn to the Index volume at p. 294., he will find references to the following companies:—Bakers', Drapers', Painters', Stainers', Pinners', Scriveners', Skinners', Wax-chandlers', Wharfingers', Weavers', and other miscellaneous notes relating to the city of London generally.]
[In addition to the incidental notices in Stow, Maitland, and Seymour, our correspondent should check the Harleian manuscripts. If he looks at the Index volume on page 294, he'll find references to the following companies: Bakers', Drapers', Painters', Stainers', Pinners', Scriveners', Skinners', Wax-chandlers', Wharfingers', Weavers', and other miscellaneous notes related to the city of London in general.]
Rousseau and Boileau.—Are there any full and complete English translations of Rousseau's Confessions and Boileau's Satires?
Rousseau and Boileau.—Are there any complete English translations of Rousseau's Confessions and Boileau's Satires?
[The following translations have been published:—The Confessions of J. J. Rousseau, in two Parts, London, 12mo., five vols., 1790; Boileau's Satires, 8vo., 1808: see also his Works made English by Mr. Ozell and others, two vols. 8vo., London, 1711-12, and three vols. 8vo., London, 1714.]
[The following translations have been published:—The Confessions of J. J. Rousseau, in two parts, London, 12mo., five volumes, 1790; Boileau's Satires, 8vo., 1808: see also his Works translated into English by Mr. Ozell and others, two volumes 8vo., London, 1711-12, and three volumes 8vo., London, 1714.]
Bishop Kennett's MS. Diary.—Where is Bishop Kennett's MS. Diary, from which his often-cited description of Dean Swift is taken, to be found? {471}Sir Walter Scott (Swift's Works, vol. xvi. p. 76.) says "it was formerly in the possession of Lord Lansdowne, and is now in the British Museum." I have never been able to find it.
Bishop Kennett's MS. Diary.—Where can I find Bishop Kennett's MS. Diary, which contains his frequently referenced description of Dean Swift? {471}Sir Walter Scott (Swift's Works, vol. xvi. p. 76.) states, "it was previously owned by Lord Lansdowne and is currently in the British Museum." I have never been able to locate it.
[The Diary here referred to by Sir Walter Scott will be found at p. 428. in Lansdowne MS. 1024., which forms the third and last volume of Bishop Kennett's "Materials for an Ecclesiastical History of England."]
[The Diary mentioned by Sir Walter Scott can be found on p. 428 of Lansdowne MS. 1024, which is the third and final volume of Bishop Kennett's "Materials for an Ecclesiastical History of England."]
Replies.
MILTON'S WIDOW.
(Vol. vi., p. 596.; Vol. vii., pp. 12. 134. 200. 375.)
(Vol. vi., p. 596.; Vol. vii., pp. 12. 134. 200. 375.)
It may be worth recording, that among the MS. papers of the late James Boswell, which were I believe sold by auction by Messrs. Sotheby and Co., there was the office copy and probate of the will of Milton's widow. She was described as Elizabeth Milton of Namptwich, widow; and it was dated the 27th of August, 1727. In the will she bequeathed all her effects, after the payment of her debts, to be divided between her nieces and nephews in Namptwich; and named as her executors, Samuel Acton and John Allcock, Esqs. Probate was granted to John Allcock, October 10, 1727.
It’s worth noting that among the manuscript papers of the late James Boswell, which were sold at auction by Sotheby & Co., there was the official copy and probate of Milton's widow's will. She was identified as Elizabeth Milton of Namptwich, widow, and it was dated August 27, 1727. In her will, she left all her belongings, after settling her debts, to be divided among her nieces and nephews in Namptwich; she appointed Samuel Acton and John Allcock, Esqs., as her executors. Probate was granted to John Allcock on October 10, 1727.
Beside this, there was a bond or acquittance, dated 1680 from Richard Mynshull, described of Wistaston in Cheshire, frame-work knitter, for 100l. received of Mrs. Elizabeth Milton in consideration of a transfer to her of a lease for lives, or ninety-nine years, of a messuage at Brindley in Cheshire, held under Sir Thomas Wilbraham.
Beside this, there was a bond or receipt, dated 1680, from Richard Mynshull, a framework knitter from Wistaston in Cheshire, for £100 received from Mrs. Elizabeth Milton in exchange for a lease for lives, or ninety-nine years, of a property in Brindley, Cheshire, which was held under Sir Thomas Wilbraham.
There were also receipts or releases from Milton's three daughters, Anne Milton, Mary Milton, and Deborah Clarke (to the last of which Abraham Clarke was a party): the first two dated Feb. 22, 1674; the last, March 27 in the same year; for 100l. each, received of Elizabeth Milton their step-mother in consideration of their shares of their father's estate. The sums were, with the consent of Christopher Milton and Richard Powell, both described of the Inner Temple, to be disposed of in the purchase of rent-charges or annuities for the benefit of the said daughters.
There were also receipts or releases from Milton's three daughters, Anne Milton, Mary Milton, and Deborah Clarke (the last of whom Abraham Clarke was involved with): the first two dated February 22, 1674; the last, March 27 of the same year; for £100 each, received from Elizabeth Milton, their stepmother, in exchange for their shares of their father's estate. The amounts were, with the agreement of Christopher Milton and Richard Powell, both noted as being from the Inner Temple, to be used for purchasing rent-charges or annuities for the benefit of the daughters.
Two of these documents appear to be now in the possession of your correspondents Mr. Marsh and Mr. Hughes; but I have met with no mention hitherto of the destination of the others.
Two of these documents seem to now be with your contacts Mr. Marsh and Mr. Hughes; however, I haven't come across any information about where the others are going.
These may seem trifling minutiæ to notice, but nothing can fairly be considered unimportant which may lead to the elucidation of the domestic history of Milton.
These may seem like insignificant details to point out, but nothing can truly be considered unimportant if it helps clarify the domestic history of Milton.
Mickleham.
Mickleham.
OATHS.
(Vol. viii., p. 364.)
(Vol. 8, p. 364.)
There can be no doubt that, as your correspondent suggests, the judicial oath was originally taken without kissing the book, but with the form of laying the right hand upon it; and, moreover that this custom is of Pagan origin. Amongst the Greeks, oaths were frequently accompanied by sacrifice; and it was the custom to lay the hands upon the victim, or upon the altar, thereby calling to witness the deity by whom the oath was sworn. So Juvenal, Sat. XIV. 218.:
There’s no doubt that, as your correspondent points out, the judicial oath was originally taken without kissing the book, but by placing the right hand on it; and also, this practice has Pagan roots. Among the Greeks, oaths were often accompanied by sacrifices; it was common to place hands on the victim or the altar, thus calling upon the deity that the oath was taken in front of. So Juvenal, Sat. XIV. 218.:
"Falsus erit testis, vendet perjuria summa
"False witnesses will sell their highest perjuries."
Exigua, et Cereris tangens aramque pedemque."
Exigua, and touching the altar of Ceres and her foot.
Christians under the later Roman emperors adopted from the Greeks a similar ceremony. In the well-known case of Omychund v. Barker, heard in Michaelmas Term, 1744, and reported in 1 Atk. 27., the Solicitor-General quoted a passage from Selden, which gives us some information on this point:
Christians during the later Roman emperors copied a similar ceremony from the Greeks. In the famous case of Omychund v. Barker, heard in Michaelmas Term, 1744, and reported in 1 Atk. 27., the Solicitor-General cited a passage from Selden, which provides us with some insight on this matter:
"Mittimus hic, principibus Christianis, ut ex historiis satis obviis liquet, solennia fuisse et peculiaria juramenta, ut per vultum sancti Lucæ, per pedem Christi, per sanctum hunc vel illum, ejusmodi alia nimis crebra: Inolevit hero tandem, ut quemadmodum Pagani sacris ac mysteriis aliquo suis aut tactis aut præsentibus jurare solebant, ita solenniora Christianorum juramenta fierent, aut tactis sacrosanctis evangeliis, aut inspectis, aut in eorum præsentia manu ad pectus amota, sublata aut protensa; atque is corporaliter seu personaliter juramentum præstari dictum est, ut ab juramentis per epistolam, aut in scriptis solummodo præstitis distingueretur, inde in vulgi passim ore."
"Historical accounts clearly show that Christian leaders took specific oaths, often swearing by the face of Saint Luke, the foot of Christ, or various saints, along with many other similar practices. Over time, it became established that just as pagans would swear by their sacred rites or in front of their gods, Christians would also make solemn oaths—either by touching the holy gospels, by observing them, or in their presence with their hand raised to their chest, lowered, or extended. It was noted that these oaths had to be made in person to set them apart from those made by letter or in writing, which is why they became widely accepted by the public.
Lord Coke tells us, in the passage quoted at p. 364., that this was called the corporal oath, because the witness "toucheth with his hand some part of the Holy Scripture;" but the better opinion seems to be, that it was so called from the ancient custom of laying the hands upon the corporale, or cloth which covered the sacred elements, by which the most solemn oath was taken in Popish times.
Lord Coke tells us, in the passage quoted on p. 364, that this was called the corporal oath because the witness "touches with his hand some part of the Holy Scripture;" but the prevailing view seems to be that it was named that way due to the ancient custom of placing hands on the corporale, or cloth that covered the sacred elements, which was how the most solemn oath was taken during Catholic times.
As to the form of kissing the book, I am inclined to think that it is not of earlier date than the latter part of the sixteenth century, and that it was first prescribed as part of the ceremony of taking the oaths of allegiance and supremacy. In the Harl. Misc., vol. vi. p. 282. (edit. 1810), is an account of the trial of Margaret Fell and George Fox, for refusing to take the oath of allegiance, followed by "An Answer to Bishop Lancelot Andrewe's Sermon concerning Swearing." At p 298., Fox brings forward instances of conscientious scruples among Christians in former times, respecting the taking of oaths. He says:
As for the ritual of kissing the book, I think it didn't originate until the late 1500s and was first required as part of the oath of allegiance and supremacy ceremonies. In the Harl. Misc., vol. vi. p. 282. (edit. 1810), there's a record of the trial of Margaret Fell and George Fox for refusing to take the oath of allegiance, followed by "An Answer to Bishop Lancelot Andrewe's Sermon concerning Swearing." On p. 298, Fox presents examples of past Christians having serious objections to taking oaths. He says:
"Did not the Pope, when he had got up over the churches, give forth both oath and curse, with bell, {472}book, and candle? And was not the ceremony of his oath, to lay three fingers a-top of the book, to signify the Trinity; and two fingers under the book, to signify damnation of body and soul if they sware falsely? And was not there a great number of people that would not swear, and suffered great persecution, as read the Book of Martyrs but to Bonner's days? And it is little above an hundred years since the Protestants got up; and they gave forth the oath of allegiance, and the oath of supremacy: the one was to deny the Pope's supremacy, and the other to acknowledge the kings of England; so we need not tell to you of their form, and show you the ceremony of the oath; it saith, 'Kiss the book;' and the book saith 'Kiss the Son,' which saith 'Swear not at all.'"
"Didn’t the Pope, when he elevated his authority over the churches, issue both an oath and a curse, with a bell, {472}book, and candle? And wasn’t the ceremony of his oath to place three fingers on the book, to represent the Trinity; and two fingers underneath the book, symbolizing the damnation of body and soul if they swore falsely? And weren’t there many people who refused to take the oath and faced severe persecution, as noted in the Book of Martyrs through Bonner's time? It’s been just over a hundred years since the Protestants rose up; they established the oath of allegiance and the oath of supremacy: one was to reject the Pope's authority, and the other was to recognize the kings of England; so there’s no need to explain their format or display the oath ceremony; it states, 'Kiss the book;' and the book says 'Kiss the Son,' who says 'Swear not at all.'
Still the laying of the hand on the book seems to have been an essential form; for, during the trial, when the oath was offered to Margaret Fell, "the clerk held out the book, and bid her pull off her glove, and lay her hand on the book" (H. M., p. 285.). And directly after, when the oath had been read to Fox, the following scene is described:
Still, the act of placing a hand on the book appears to have been an essential practice; during the trial, when the oath was presented to Margaret Fell, "the clerk held out the book and told her to take off her glove and place her hand on the book" (H. M., p. 285.). Immediately after, when the oath was read to Fox, the following scene is described:
"'Give him the book,' said they; and so a man that stood by him held up the book, and said, 'Lay your hand on the book.'
"'Give him the book,' they said; so a man nearby held up the book and said, 'Put your hand on the book.'
"Geo. Fox. 'Give me the book in my hand.' Which set them all a-gazing, and as in hope he would have sworn."
"Geo. Fox. 'Hand me the book.' This left everyone staring, and they appeared to hope he would swear."
And it appears from the case of Omychund v. Barker, that, at that time, the usual form was by laying the right hand on the book, and kissing it afterwards (1 Atk. 42.). It seems not improbable that Paley's suggestion, in his Moral Philosophy, vol. i. p. 192. (10th edit.), may be correct. He says:
And it looks like from the case of Omychund v. Barker, that back then, the standard practice was to place the right hand on the book and then kiss it afterwards (1 Atk. 42.). It seems quite possible that Paley's suggestion in his Moral Philosophy, vol. i. p. 192. (10th edit.), could be right. He states:
"The kiss seems rather an act of reverence to the contents of the book, as, in the Popish ritual, the priest kisses the gospel before he reads it, than any part of the oath."
"The kiss seems more like a gesture of respect for the book’s contents, much like how a priest kisses the gospel in Catholic tradition before reading it, rather than being related to any part of the oath."
The Query respecting the Welsh custom I must leave to those who are better informed respecting the judicial forms of that country; merely suggesting whether the practice alluded to by your correspondent may not originally have had a meaning similar to that of the three fingers on the book, and two under, as described by Fox in the passage above quoted.
The question about the Welsh custom is something I'll leave to those who know more about the legal practices in that country. I just want to suggest whether the practice mentioned by your correspondent might have originally had a meaning similar to the three fingers on the book and the two underneath, as described by Fox in the passage quoted above.
Warwick.
Warwick.
In the bailiwick of Guernsey the person sworn lifts his right hand, and the presiding judge, who administers the oath, says "Vous jurez par la foi et le serment que vous devez à Dieu que," &c. Oaths of office, however, are taken on the Gospels, and are read to the person swearing by the greffier, or clerk of the court. The reason of this difference may be accounted for by the fact that the official oaths, as they now exist, appear to have been drawn up about the beginning of the reign of James I., and that in all probability the form was enjoined by the superior authority of the Privy Council.
In Guernsey, the person taking the oath raises their right hand, and the presiding judge who administers the oath says, "You swear by the faith and the oath that you owe to God that," etc. However, oaths of office are taken on the Gospels and are read to the person swearing by the court clerk. The reason for this difference likely stems from the fact that the official oaths, as they exist today, seem to have been created around the beginning of James I's reign, and it's probable that this form was mandated by the Privy Council.
Which of the two forms was generally used before the Reformation, I have not been able to discover; but in an account of the laws, privileges, and customs of the island, taken by way of inquisition in the year 1331, but more fully completed and approved in the year 1441, it appears that the juries of the several parishes were sworn "sur Sainctes Evangiles de Dieu par eulx et par chacun d'eulx corporellement touché,"—"par leurs consciences sur le peril de la dampnation de leurs ames."
Which of the two forms was generally used before the Reformation is something I haven't been able to find out; however, in a report on the laws, privileges, and customs of the island, conducted through an inquisition in 1331 but more thoroughly completed and approved in 1441, it appears that the juries from various parishes were sworn "on the Holy Gospels of God by them and by each of them physically touched,"—"on their consciences under the peril of the damnation of their souls."
I remember to have seen men from some of the Baltic ports, when told to lift their right hands to be sworn, double down the ring finger and the little finger, as is done by bishops in the Roman Catholic Church when giving the benediction.
I remember seeing men from some of the Baltic ports, when asked to raise their right hands to be sworn in, fold down their ring finger and pinky finger, just like bishops in the Roman Catholic Church do when giving the blessing.
In France the person making oath lifts his right hand. The oath is administered by the presiding judge without any reference to the Deity, but the person who swears is required to answer "Je le jure." I observed that in Britanny, when the person sworn was ignorant of the French language, the answer was "Va Doué," which, I believe, means in the Breton dialect, "By God."
In France, the person taking the oath raises their right hand. The oath is given by the presiding judge without mentioning God, but the person swearing must respond with "Je le jure." I noticed that in Brittany, when the person swearing didn’t know French, their response was "Va Doué," which I believe means "By God" in the Breton dialect.
In the Ecclesiastical Court of Guernsey I have seen the book presented to the person swearing open at one of the Gospels; but in the Royal Court the book is put into the right hand of the party making oath, shut. In either case it is required that the book should be kissed.
In the Ecclesiastical Court of Guernsey, I've seen the book given to the person taking an oath while open to one of the Gospels; however, in the Royal Court, the book is handed to the person swearing, closed, in their right hand. In both situations, the book is required to be kissed.
Guernsey.
Guernsey.
COMMINATORY INSCRIPTIONS IN BOOKS.
(Vol. viii., pp. 64. 153.)
(Vol. 8, pp. 64. 153.)
Many inscriptions, comminatory or exhortatory, written in books and directed to readers, have been commemorated in "N. & Q." Towards the beginning of the present century, the most common epigram of the kind in the French public schools was the following elegant motto, with its accompanying illustration:
Many inscriptions, warning or motivational, written in books and aimed at readers, have been recorded in "N. & Q." At the start of this century, the most popular saying of this kind in French public schools was the following elegant motto, along with its illustration:
"Aspice Pierrot pendu,
"Aspice Pierrot hanging,
Quota librum n'a pas rendu!"
"Quota librum hasn't returned!"
Poor Pierrot is exhibited in a state of suspension, as hanging from the inverted letter L (Γ), which symbolises the fatal tree. Comminatory and exhortatory cautions not to soil, spoil, or tear books and MSS. occur so frequently in the records of monastic libraries, that a whole album could easily be filled with them. The coquettish bishop, Venantius Fortunatus, has a distich on the subject. Another learned Goth, Theud-wulf, or Theodulfus, Charlemagne's Missus dominicus, {473}recommends readers a proper ablution of their hands before turning the consecrated leaves:
Poor Pierrot is displayed in a state of suspension, hanging from the upside-down letter L (Γ), which represents the tree of doom. Warnings and strong reminders not to dirty, ruin, or tear books and manuscripts appear so often in the records of monastic libraries that a whole album could easily be filled with them. The playful bishop, Venantius Fortunatus, has written a couplet on the matter. Another learned Goth, Theud-wulf, or Theodulfus, Charlemagne's Missus dominicus, {473}advises readers to wash their hands properly before turning the sacred pages:
"Utere me, lector, mentisque in sede locato;
"Sit back, reader, and settle in your seat;
Cumque librum petis hinc, sit tibi lota manus!"—Saith Library.
Cumque librum petis hinc, sit tibi lota manus!"—Saith Library.
Less lenient are the imprecations commemorated by Don Martenne and Wanley. The one inscribed on the blank leaf of a Sacramentary of the ninth century is to the following effect:
Less lenient are the curses recorded by Don Martenne and Wanley. The one written on the blank page of a ninth-century Sacramentary is to the following effect:
"Si quis eum (librum) de monasterio aliquo ingenio non redditurus, abstraxerit, cum Juda proditore, Annâ et Caïphâ, portionem æternæ damnationis accipiat. Amen! Amen! Fiat! fiat!"—Voyage Littéraire, p. 67.
"Anyone who takes this book from any monastery without intending to return it may receive, along with Judas the traitor, a share of eternal damnation. Amen! Amen! So be it! So be it!"—Voyage Littéraire, p. 67.
That is fierce and fiery, and in very earnest. A MS. of the Bodleian bears this other inscription, to the same import:
That is intense and passionate, and very sincere. A manuscript from the Bodleian has this other note with the same meaning:
"Liber Sanctæ Mariæ de Ponte Roberti. Qui eum abstulerit aut vendiderit ... aut quamlibet ejus partem absciderit, sit anathema maranatha."
"Book of Saint Mary of the Bridge of Robert. Whoever removes it, sells it ... or cuts off any part of it, may they be cursed."
Canisius, in his Antiquæ Lectiones (I. ii. p. 3. 320.), transcribes another comminatory distich, copied from a MS. of the Saint Gall library:
Canisius, in his Antiquæ Lectiones (I. ii. p. 3. 320.), transcribes another warning distich, taken from a manuscript of the Saint Gall library:
"Auferat hunc librum nullus hinc, omne per ævum,
"Let this book be taken by no one, throughout all time,
Cum Gallo partem quisquis habere cupit!"
Cum Gallo partem quisquis habere cupit!"
Such recommendations are now no longer in use, and seem rather excessive. But whoever has witnessed the extreme carelessness, not to say improbity, of some of the readers admitted into the public continental libraries, who scruple not to soil, spoil, and even purloin the most precious and rare volumes, feels easily reconciled to the anathema maranatha of the ninth and tenth centuries.
Such recommendations are no longer in use and seem somewhat excessive now. However, anyone who has seen the extreme carelessness, not to mention dishonesty, of some of the readers allowed into the public continental libraries—who don’t hesitate to soil, damage, and even steal the most precious and rare books—can easily understand the anathema maranatha from the ninth and tenth centuries.
P.S.—Excuse my French-English.
P.S.—Sorry for my French-English.
Paris, Palais de l'Institut.
Paris, Palais de l'Institut.
LIVERIES WORN, AND MENIAL SERVICES PERFORMED, BY GENTLEMEN.
(Vol. vi., p. 146.)
(Vol. 6, p. 146.)
However remarkable the conduct of the rustic esquire of Downham may appear in the present duly, when he accepted and wore the livery of his neighbour the Knight-Baronet of Houghton Tower, it was a Common practice for gentlemen of good birth and estate to accept and wear, and even to assume without solicitation, upon state occasions, the livery of an influential neighbour, friend, or relation, in testimony of respect and affection for the giver of the livery.
However remarkable the behavior of the country gentleman from Downham may seem today, when he accepted and wore the uniform of his neighbor, the Knight-Baronet of Houghton Tower, it was a common practice for gentlemen of good birth and wealth to accept and wear, and even to adopt without being asked, on formal occasions, the uniform of an influential neighbor, friend, or relative as a sign of respect and affection for the person who provided it.
Thus it appears in the Diary of Nicholas Assheton that, in 1617, to the Court at Mirescough "Cooz Assheton came with his gentlemanlie servants as anie was there," and that the retinue of menial servants in attendance upon Sir Richard Houghton was graced by the presence of more than one country gentleman of good family. Baines, in his History of Lancashire, vol. ii. p. 366., also relates concerning Humphrey Chetham, that—
Thus it appears in the Diary of Nicholas Assheton that, in 1617, to the Court at Mirescough "Cooz Assheton came with his gentlemanly servants as anyone was there," and that the group of servants attending Sir Richard Houghton was joined by more than one country gentleman of good family. Baines, in his History of Lancashire, vol. ii. p. 366., also mentions Humphrey Chetham, that—
"In 1635 he was nominated to serve the office of sheriff of the county, and discharged the duties thereof with great honour, several gentlemen of birth and estate attending and wearing his livery at the assizes, to testify their respect and affection for him."
"In 1635, he was appointed sheriff of the county and carried out his duties with great honor, accompanied by several gentlemen of noble birth and status who wore his uniform at court sessions to express their respect and admiration for him."
Evelyn, in his Diary, gives a similar account of the conduct of "divers gentlemen and persons of quality" in the counties of Surrey and Sussex:
Evelyn, in his Diary, provides a similar account of the behavior of "various gentlemen and people of distinction" in the counties of Surrey and Sussex:
"1634. My father was appointed sheriff for Surrey and Sussex before they were disjoyned. He had 116 servants in liverys, every one livery'd in greene sattin doublets. Divers gentlemen and persons of quality waited on him in the same garbe and habit, which at that time (when thirty or forty was the the usual retinue of the high sheriff) was esteemed a great matter. Nor was this out of the least vanity that my father exceeded (who was one of the greatest decliners of it); but because he could not refuse the civility of his friends and relations, who voluntarily came themselves, or sent in their servants."
"1634. My father was appointed sheriff for Surrey and Sussex before they were split into two separate regions. He had 116 servants in uniforms, each wearing green satin doublets. Several gentlemen and notable people joined him in the same attire, which was quite impressive at that time, considering a standard retinue for a high sheriff was around thirty or forty. This wasn’t due to any vanity on my father’s part (he was actually one of the biggest opponents of such display); rather, it was because he couldn’t decline the kindness of his friends and family, who either came themselves or sent their servants."
The practice of assuming the livery of a relation or friend, and of permitting servants also to wear it, appears to have existed in England in the time of Richard II., and to have had the personal example of this sovereign to support it. He seems, however, to have thereby excited the disapprobation of many of his spiritual and temporal peers. I produce the following passage with some hesitation, because it is by no means certain that any one of the liveries thus assumed by Richard was a livery of cloth:
The practice of taking on the uniform of a relative or friend, and allowing servants to wear it too, seems to have existed in England during the time of Richard II., and this king seemingly set the example. However, he appears to have drawn the disapproval of many of his spiritual and temporal peers. I share the following passage with some caution, as it’s not at all certain that any of the uniforms adopted by Richard were made of cloth:
"17th Richard II. A.D. 1393-4.
"17th Richard II. A.D. 1393-4.
"Richard Count d'Arundell puis le comencement de cest present Parlement disoit au Roy, en presence des Achevesques de Canterbirs et d'Everwyk, le Duc de Gloucestr', les Evesques de Wyncestre et Saresbirs, le Count de Warrewyk et autres....
"Richard, Count d'Arundell, at the start of this current Parliament, addressed the King in front of the Archbishops of Canterbury and York, the Duke of Gloucester, the Bishops of Winchester and Salisbury, the Earl of Warwick, and others...."
"Item q le Roy deust porter la Livere de coler le Duc de Guyene et de Lancastr'.
"Additionally, the King was to carry the Book of the Duke of Guyenne and Lancaster."
"Item q gentz de retenue de Roi portent mesme la Livere....
"Also, a gentle reminder that the King's authority carries the same weight as the Livre....
"A qei nre Sr le Roi alors respondi au dit Count ... q bientot apres la venue son dit uncle de Guyene quant il vient d'Espaign darrein en Engleterre q mesme nre Sr le Roi prist le Coler du cool mesme son uncle et mist a son cool demesne et dist q'il vorroit porter et user en signe de bon amour d'entier coer entre eux auxi come il fait les Liveres ses autres uncles.
"A queen noted that the King then responded to the Count ... shortly after his uncle returned from Guyenne, having just come back from Spain to England. The King took the Collar from his uncle and put it on himself, saying he wanted to wear it as a symbol of deep affection and complete unity between them, just like he does for the liveries of his other uncles."
"Item (quant au tierce) nre Sr le Roi disoit q ceo fuist de counge de luy et de sa volunte q gentz de sa retenue portent et usent mesme la Livere de Coler."—Rolls of Parliament, vol. iii. p. 313.
"Also (regarding the third point), the King said that this was by his consent and will, and that members of his retinue could carry and use the same Letter of Coler."—Rolls of Parliament, vol. iii. p. 313.
"Item. That the King uses to wear the livery of the collar of the Duke of Guienne and of Lancaster.
"Also. The King wears the livery of the collar of the Duke of Guienne and Lancaster."
"Item. That persons of the retinue of the King wear the same livery.
"Also. The members of the King's entourage wear the same uniform."
"To which our lord the King then answered to the said earl....
"To which our lord the King then responded to the said earl....
"That soon after the coming of his said uncle of Guienne, when he came from Spain last into England, that himself our lord the King took the collar from the neck of the same his uncle and put it on his own neck, and said that he vowed to wear and to use it in sign of good love of whole heart between them also, as he did the liveries of his other uncles.
"That soon after his uncle arrived from Guienne, when he returned from Spain to England, our lord the King took the collar from his uncle's neck and placed it around his own, declaring that he vowed to wear and use it as a sign of genuine affection between them, just like he did with the livery of his other uncles."
"Item (as to the third). Our lord the King said that it was by leave from him, and by his wish, that persons of his retinue wear and use the same livery of the collar."
"Also (as to the third). Our lord the King said that it was with his permission, and by his desire, that members of his retinue wear and use the same uniform of the collar."
This practice of one of our early sovereigns seems to afford a precedent for the mode in which divers gentlemen and persons of quality voluntarily showed civility towards Richard Evelyn, and for that in which several gentlemen of birth and estate testified their respect and affection for Humphrey Chetham. Nicholas Assheton also appears to have the support of this royal precedent in so far as relates to his accepting and wearing the livery of a friend and neighbour; and the custom of his day evidently lends its sanction to his forming, upon a state occasion, one of the body of menial servants in attendance upon Sir Richard Houghton, when he went to meet the king.
This practice of one of our early rulers seems to provide a basis for how various gentlemen and people of status willingly showed respect to Richard Evelyn, as well as how several notable gentlemen expressed their regard and admiration for Humphrey Chetham. Nicholas Assheton also seems to have the backing of this royal example when it comes to accepting and wearing the livery of a friend and neighbor; and the customs of his time clearly support his joining, during a formal event, as one of the attendants in service to Sir Richard Houghton when he went to meet the king.
Another passage in the Rolls of Parliament seems to afford a respectable civic precedent for the services performed by Nicholas Assheton and other liveried gentlemen, when they waited at the lords' table at Houghton Tower:
Another passage in the Rolls of Parliament appears to provide a solid civic example for the services carried out by Nicholas Assheton and other dressed-up gentlemen when they attended the lords' table at Houghton Tower:
"11th Edward III. A.D. 1337.
"11th Edward III. A.D. 1337.
"A nre Seigneur le Roy et a son conseil monstre Richard de Bettoyne de Loundres, qe come au Coronement nre Seigneur le Roy q ore est il adonge Meire de Loundres fesoit l'office de Botiller ove CCC e LX vadletz vestutz d'une sute chescun portant en sa mayn un coupe blanche d'argent come autres Meirs de Loundres ountz faitz as Coronementz des
genitours nostre Seigneur le Roy dont memoire ne court pars et le fee q appendoit a cel jorne c'est asavoir un coupe d'or ove la covercle et un ewer d'or enamaille lui fust livere
assent du Counte de Lancastre et d'autres Grantz qu'adonges y furent du Conseil nostre Seigneur le Roy
la mayn Sire Roƀt de Wodehouse et ore vient en estreite as Viscountes de Londres hors del Chekker de faire lever des Biens et Chateux du dit Richard xx/iiii ixli. xiis. vid. pur le fee avant dit dont il prie qe remedie lui soit ordeyne.
"Our Lord the King and his council present Richard of Bettoyne from London, who, during the coronation of our current Lord the King, served as Mayor of London and acted as the butler with three hundred and sixty attendants, all dressed in similar outfits and each holding a white silver cup, as previous mayors of London have done at the coronations of the ancestors of our Lord the King, whose memory is not well-known. The fee associated with this duty includes a gold cup with a lid and an enameled gold ewer, which was given to him by the Count of Lancaster and other nobles who were present at our Lord the King's council, through the hand of Sir Robert of Wodehouse. This matter is now under review by the Viscounts of London outside the Exchequer to collect the goods and possessions of the said Richard, totaling eighty-nine pounds, twelve shillings, and sixpence, for the fee mentioned, for which he requests a remedy to be arranged for him."
"Et le Meire et Citoyens d'Oxenford ount
point de chartre q'ils vendront a Londres l'Encorronement d'eyder le Meire de Loundres pur servir a la fest et toutz jours l'ount usee. Et si i plest a nre Seigneur le Roy et a son Conseil nous payerons volonters la fee issent qe nous soyons descharges de la service."—Rolls of Parliament, vol. ii. p. 96.
"And the Mayor and Citizens of Oxford have by their charter agreed that they will come to London for the coronation to help the Mayor of London with the feast, which they have always done. If it pleases our Lord the King and his Council, we will gladly pay the fee in exchange for being relieved of that service."—Rolls of Parliament, vol. ii. p. 96.
"To our lord the King and to his Council sheweth Richard de Bettoyne of London, that whereas at the coronation of our lord the King that now is, he their mayor of London performed the office of butler with three hundred and sixty valets clothed of one suit each, bearing in his hand a white cup of silver, as other mayors of London have done at the coronations of the progenitors of our lord the King, whereof memory runneth not, and the fee which appertained to this day's work, that is to wit, a cup of gold with the cover, and a ewer of gold enamelled, were delivered to him by assent of the Earl of Lancaster, and of the other grandees who then there were of the council of our lord the King, by the hand of Sire Robert de Wodehouse, and now comes in estreat to the viscounts of London out of the Checquer, to cause to take the goods and chattels of the said Richard, eighty-nine pounds twelve shillings and sixpence, for the fee aforesaid, whereof he prays that remedy be ordained to him.
"To our Lord the King and his Council, Richard de Bettoyne of London states that at the coronation of our current King, he, as the Mayor of London, served as the butler with three hundred and sixty attendants, all dressed in matching outfits, each holding a white silver cup, just as previous mayors of London have done at the coronations of our King’s ancestors, which are not well-remembered. The fee for this service, which included a gold cup with a lid and an enameled gold ewer, was given to him with the agreement of the Earl of Lancaster and the other nobles at the King’s council, through Sir Robert de Wodehouse. Now, there is a demand from the Viscounts of London from the Exchequer to seize Richard's belongings, amounting to eighty-nine pounds, twelve shillings, and sixpence, for the mentioned fee, which he asks to have remedied."
"And the mayor and citizens of Oxford have, by point of charter, that they shall come to London to the coronation, to help the mayor of London to serve at the feast, and always have so done. And if it please our lord the King and his Council, we will pay willingly the fee, provided that we be discharged of the service."
"And the Mayor and Citizens of Oxford have, under their charter, agreed to come to London for the coronation to assist the Mayor of London with the feast, which they have always done. If it is acceptable to our Lord the King and his Council, we will willingly pay the fee, as long as we are relieved from the service."
There can be little doubt that the citizens of Oxford bore their own travelling expenses; and it seems probable that the citizens of London and Oxford bore the cost of the three hundred and sixty suits of clothes and three hundred and sixty silver cups; but this is scarcely sufficient to account for their willingness to pay a sum of money equivalent to about fifteen hundred pounds in the present day, in order to be relieved from the honourable service of waiting clothed in uniform, each with a silver cup in his hand, helping the Mayor of London to perform the office of butler at coronation feasts. However this may be, it is still somewhat remarkable that, in the seventeenth century, Nicholas Assheton of Downham, Esq., and other gentlemen of Lancashire, upon a less important occasion than a coronation feast, dressed in the livery of Sir Richard Houghton and voluntarily attended, day after day, at the lords' table at Houghton Tower, and served the lords with biscuit, wine, and Jelly.
There’s little doubt that the citizens of Oxford covered their own travel expenses; it’s likely that the citizens of London and Oxford also paid for the three hundred and sixty suits of clothes and three hundred and sixty silver cups. However, this hardly explains their willingness to pay an amount equivalent to about fifteen hundred pounds today, just to be relieved from the respectable duty of dressing in uniform, each holding a silver cup, to help the Mayor of London serve as butler at coronation feasts. Regardless, it’s still quite notable that, in the seventeenth century, Nicholas Assheton of Downham, Esq., and other gentlemen from Lancashire, on a less significant occasion than a coronation feast, wore the livery of Sir Richard Houghton and willingly attended, day after day, at the lords' table at Houghton Tower, serving the lords with biscuits, wine, and jelly.
FEMALE PARISH CLERKS.
(Vol. viii., p. 338.)
(Vol. 8, p. 338.)
The cases of Rex v. Stubbs and Olive v. Ingram, mentioned in the following extracts from Prideaux's Guide to Churchwardens, p. 4., may be of service:
The cases of Rex v. Stubbs and Olive v. Ingram, mentioned in the following extracts from Prideaux's Guide to Churchwardens, p. 4., may be of service:
"Generally speaking, all persons inhabitants of the parish are liable to serve the office of churchwarden, {475}and from the cases of Rex v. Stubbs (2 T. R. 395.; 1 Bott. 10.), in which it was held that a woman is not exempt from serving the office of overseer of the poor, and Olive v. Ingram (2 Str. 1114.), in which it was held that she may be a parish sexton, there may, perhaps, be some ground for contending a woman is not exempt from this duty."
"Generally, all residents inhabitants of the parish must serve as churchwarden. {475} Based on the cases of Rex v. Stubbs (2 T. R. 395.; 1 Bott. 10.), which established that a woman is not exempt from serving as overseer of the poor, and Olive v. Ingram (2 Str. 1114.), where it was determined that she can be a parish sexton, there may be some grounds to argue that a woman is not exempt from this duty."
A few years ago (she may still be so) there was a gentlewoman the parish clerk of some church in London; perhaps some of your readers may be able to say where: a deputy officiated, excepting occasionally. But many such instances have occurred.
A few years ago (she might still be) there was a woman who served as the parish clerk of a church in London; maybe some of your readers can pinpoint which one: a deputy filled in most of the time, except for occasional instances. But there have been many such cases.
In a note in Prideaux's Directions to Churchwardens (late edition), the following references are given as to the power of women to fill parochial and other such offices: Rex v. Stubbs, 2 T. R. 359.; Olive v. Ingram, 2 Strange, 1114.
In a note in Prideaux's Directions to Churchwardens (latest edition), the following references are provided regarding women's ability to hold parish and similar positions: Rex v. Stubbs, 2 T. R. 359.; Olive v. Ingram, 2 Strange, 1114.
Rectory, Clyst St. George.
Rectory, Clyst St. George.
I beg to inform Y. S. M. that when I went to reside near Lincoln in 1828, a woman was clerk to the parish of Sudbrooke, and died in that capacity a very few years after. I do not remember her name at this moment, but I could get all particulars if required on my return to Sudbrooke Holme.
I want to let Y. S. M. know that when I moved to the area near Lincoln in 1828, there was a woman who worked as the clerk for the parish of Sudbrooke, and she passed away in that role just a few years later. I can’t recall her name right now, but I could find all the details if needed when I go back to Sudbrooke Holme.
Balmoral Hotel, Broadstairs, Kent.
Balmoral Hotel, Broadstairs, Kent.
I am able to mention another instance of a woman acting as parish clerk at Ickburgh, in the county of Norfolk. It is the parish to Buckenham Hall, the seat of the Honourable Francis Baring, near Thetford. A woman there has long officiated as parish clerk, and still continues acting in that capacity.
I can point out another case of a woman serving as parish clerk in Ickburgh, Norfolk. This is the parish for Buckenham Hall, the home of the Honorable Francis Baring, near Thetford. A woman has been serving as parish clerk there for a long time and still holds that position.
I beg to refer Y. S. M. to the following passage Madame d'Arblay's Diary, vol. v. p. 246.:
I would like to point out Y. S. M. to the following passage from Madame d'Arblay's Diary, vol. v. p. 246.:
"There was at Collumpton only a poor wretched ragged woman, a female clerk, to show us this church: she pays a man for doing the duty, while she receives the salary in right of her deceased husband!"
"At Collumpton, we encountered a poor, miserable, ragged woman who was a female clerk. She was the one showing us this church, but she hires a man to handle the duties while she collects the salary due to her late husband!"
At Misterton, near Crewkerne, in Somersetshire, Mary Mounford was clerk for more than thirty years. She gave up the office about the year 1832, and is now in Beaminster Union, just eighty-nine years old.
At Misterton, near Crewkerne in Somerset, Mary Mounford was a clerk for over thirty years. She left the position around 1832 and is now in Beaminster Union, at the age of eighty-nine.
POETICAL EPITHETS OF THE NIGHTINGALE.
(Vol. vii., p. 397.; Vol. viii., p. 112.)
(Vol. vii., p. 397.; Vol. viii., p. 112.)
To the one hundred and ten epithets poetically applied to the nightingale and its song, collected by Mr. Bede, permit me to add sixty-five more.
To the one hundred and ten poetic names given to the nightingale and its song, gathered by Mr. Bede, I’d like to add sixty-five more.
Azure-crested. Cowper.
Azure-crested. Cowper.
Bewailing. Drummond.
Wailing. Drummond.
Chaunting. Skelton.
Chanting. Skelton.
Chaste poet. Grainger.
Pure poet. Grainger.
Dappled. Anon.[2]
Speckled. Anon.__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
Darling. Carey.
Sweetheart. Carey.
Daulian minstrel. Herrick.
Daulian singer. Herrick.
Delightful. Shelley.
Awesome. Shelley.
Dusky-brown. Trench.
Dark brown. Trench.
Early. C. Smith.
Early. C. Smith.
Elegiac. Dibdin.
Mournful. Dibdin.
Enamoured. Shelley.
In love. Shelley.
Fabled. Byron.
Legendary. Byron.
Fair. Smart.
Fair. Intelligent.
Greeful.[3] Lodge.
Grateful.__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Lodge.
Gurgling. Lloyd.
Gurgling. Lloyd.
Hallow'd. Moore.
Holy. Moore.
Hundred-throated. Tennyson.
Hundred-throated. Tennyson.
Invisible. Hurdis.
Invisible. Hurdis.
Lesbian. Bromley.
Lesbian. Bromley.
Love-learned. Thomson.
Learned through love. Thomson.
Love-sick. Warton.
Heartbroken. Warton.
Loud-complaining. Gibbons.
Loud complaints. Gibbons.
Lulling. Anon.[4]
Calming. Soon.__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
Lute-tongued. Anon.[5]
Sharp-tongued. Anon.__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
Mellow. Strangford.
Chill. Strangford.
Midnight minstrel. Logan.
Midnight singer. Logan.
Moody. Hurdis.
Moody. Hurdis.
Nightly. Bidlake.
Every night. Bidlake.
Pandionian. Drummond.
Pandionian. Drummond.
Panged. Hood.
Pained. Hood.
Pitiful. Herrick.
Pitiful. Herrick.
Plaintful. Drummond.
Painful. Drummond.
Quavering. Poole.
Trembling. Poole.
Querulous. Kennedy.
Complaining. Kennedy.
Rapturous. Southey.
Ecstatic. Southey.
Rural. Dryden.
Country. Dryden.
Sable.[6] Drummond.
Sable. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Drummond.
Sadly-pleasing.[7] Anon.
Bittersweet. __A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__ Anon.
Secret. Shelley.
Secret. Shelley.
Sely. Chaucer.
Sely. Chaucer.
Sequestered. J. Montgomery.
Isolated. J. Montgomery.
Shy. Dallas.
Introverted. Dallas.
Silver-tuned. Carey.
Silver-tuned. Carey.
Simple. Derrick.
Simple. Derrick.
Sobbing. Planché.
Sobbing. Planché.
Soft-tuned. Whaley.
Soft-tuned. Whaley.
Solitary. Bowring.
Alone. Bowring.
Sorrow-soothing. Shaw.
Soothing sorrow. Shaw.
Sprightly. Elton.
Energetic. Elton.
Sweet-breasted. Beaumont and Fletcher.
Sweet-breasted. Beaumont and Fletcher.
Sweet-tongued. Anon.[8]
Smooth talker. Anon.__A_TAG_PLACEHOLDER_0__
Sylvan syren. Pattison.
Sylvan siren. Pattison.
Tearful. Potter.
Emotional. Potter.
Tenderest. Wiffen.
Most tender. Wiffen.
Thracian. Lewis.
Thracian. Lewis.
Transporting. Hurdis.
Transporting. Hurdis.
Unadorned. Hurdis.
Plain. Hurdis.
Unhappy. Croxall.
Not happy. Croxall.
Watchful. Philips.
Observant. Philips.
Witching. Proctor.
Witchcraft. Proctor.
Woodland. Smith.
Woodland. Smith.
Wretched. Shirley.
Awful. Shirley.
Wronged. P. Fletcher.
Wronged. P. Fletcher.
Yearly. Drayton.
Annually. Drayton.
Young. Lewis.
Young. Lewis.
The character of the mere song alone has been described in the following terms:
The essence of the simple song has been described in the following terms:
Melodious lay. Potter.
Melodious song. Potter.
Lofty song. Yalden.
Uplifting song. Yalden.
A storm of sound. Shelley.
A storm of sound. Shelley.
Impressive lay. Merry.
Great job. Awesome.
Swelling slow. Kirk White.
Slow swelling. Kirk White.
Tremulously slow. C. Smith.
Tentatively slow. C. Smith.
Wild melody. Shelley.
Wild melody. Shelley.
Thick melodious note. Lloyd.
Deep melodic note. Lloyd.
Hymn of lore. Logan.
Legendary song. Logan.
Melting lay. Henley.
Melting point. Henley.
Harmonious woe. Pomfret.
Bittersweet sadness. Pomfret.
Well-tuned warble. Shakspeare.
Well-tuned warble. Shakespeare.
Luscious lays. Warton.
Rich layers. Warton.
Sadly sweet. Potter.
Bittersweet. Potter.
Varied strains. Pope.
Different strains. Pope.
Thick-warbled notes. Milton.
Deep, resonant notes. Milton.
Ham.
Ham.
Blackwood's Mag., Jan. 1838.
Blackwood's Magazine, Jan. 1838.
"I regard the prettie, greeful bard
"I consider the pretty, graceful bard"
With tearfull, yet delightfull, notes complaine."—Heliconia.
With tearful, yet delightful, notes complain."—Heliconia.
Lays of the Minnesingers.
Songs of the Minnesingers.
Weekly Visitor, July, 1835.
Weekly Visitor, July 1835.
"Night's sable birds, which plain when others sleep."—Thaumantia.
"Night's dark birds, which sing when others sleep."—Thaumantia.
Evening Elegy.—Poetical Calendar.
Evening Elegy.—Poetry Calendar.
Harleian Miscellany, vol. viii.
Harleian Miscellany, vol. 8.
PHOTOGRAPHIC CORRESPONDENCE.
Photographic Exhibition.—We understand that the Photographic Society has made arrangements for an exhibition of photographs in the metropolis during the months of January and February next. The exhibition will not be confined to the works of native photographers, but will comprise specimens of the most eminent foreign artists, who have been specially invited to contribute. From the advances which have been made in this favourite art, even since the recent exhibition in the rooms of the Society of Arts, we may confidently anticipate that the display on the present occasion will be one of the highest interest.
Photographic Exhibition.—We hear that the Photographic Society has organized an exhibition of photographs in the city during January and February. The exhibition won't be limited to local photographers; it will also include works from the most renowned foreign artists who have been specifically invited to participate. Given the progress that has been made in this popular art form since the last exhibition at the Society of Arts, we can confidently expect that this display will be of great interest.
How much Light is obstructed by a Lens?—Can any of your scientific correspondents furnish me with an approximation to the quantity of light which is transmitted through an ordinary double achromatic lens, say of Ross, Voightlander, or any other celebrated maker?
How much Light is obstructed by a Lens?—Can any of your scientific contacts provide me with an estimate of the amount of light that passes through a standard double achromatic lens, like those made by Ross, Voightlander, or any other well-known manufacturer?
Stereoscopic Articles.—I cannot agree to my opponent's assumed amendment (?) (Vol. viii., p. 419.) space, for the simple reason that it would be virtually abandoning the whole of the points in dispute between us; when farther discussion and more mature consideration, only tend to convince me more firmly of the correctness of the propositions I have advocated, viz.:
Stereoscopic Articles.—I can't agree with my opponent's proposed change (?) (Vol. viii., p. 419.) space, simply because it would mean giving up all the key issues we've been debating; as further discussion and deeper consideration only strengthen my belief in the correctness of the points I've supported, namely:
1st. That circumstances may and do arise in which a better result is obtained in producing stereographs, when the chord of the angle of generation is more or less than 2½ inches.
1st. That circumstances may and do arise in which a better result is obtained in producing stereographs when the chord of the angle of generation is greater or lesser than 2½ inches.
2nd. That the positions of the camera should not be parallel but radial.
2nd. That the camera angles should not be parallel but radial.
I certainly thought that I had, as I intended, expressed the fact that I treat the cameras precisely as two eyes, and moreover I still contend that they should be so treated; my object being to present to each eye exactly such a picture and in such a direction as would be presented under certain circumstances. The plane of delineation being a flat, instead of a curved surface, has nothing whatever to do with this point, because the curves of the retinas are not portions of one curve having a common centre, but each having its own centre in the axis of the pupil. That a plane surface for receiving the image is not so good as a spherical one would be, is not disputed; but this observation applies to photographs universally, and is only put up with as the lesser of two evils. A plane surface necessarily contracts the field of view to such a space as could be cut out of the periphery of a hollow sphere, the versed sine of which bears but a small ratio to its chord.
I definitely thought that I had, as I meant to, expressed the fact that I treat the cameras exactly like two eyes, and I still believe they should be treated that way; my goal is to show each eye precisely the same image and in the same direction as would be seen under certain conditions. The drawing surface being flat instead of curved doesn’t change this point at all, because the curves of the retinas aren’t parts of one curve with a common center, but each has its own center aligned with the pupil's axis. It’s true that a flat surface for capturing images isn’t as good as a spherical one, and that’s not up for debate; however, this is applicable to photographs in general, and we only accept it as the lesser of two evils. A flat surface inevitably limits the field of view to a space that could be cut out from the edge of a hollow sphere, where the versed sine has only a small ratio to its chord.
There is another misunderstanding into which my opponent has fallen,
viz. the part of the object to be delineated, which should form the
centre of radiation, is not the most contiguous visible point, but the
most remote principal point of observation. I perceive that this is the
case from two illustrations he was kind enough to forward me, being
stereographs of a square, placed with the points of junction towards
the observer, and the tail receding from him; and in one case the angle
of the square is made the centre of radiation, and while its distance
from the camera is only six feet, the points of delineation are no less
than three feet apart.
There’s another misunderstanding my opponent has fallen into. The part of the object that should be highlighted, which acts as the center of focus, isn’t the nearest visible point but rather the furthest main point of observation. I see this clearly from two examples he kindly sent me, which are stereographs of a square, positioned with the corners facing the observer and the base moving away. In one case, the corner of the square is used as the focus, and even though it’s only six feet away from the camera, the points of focus are three feet apart.
To push an argument to the extreme to test its value, is quite right; but this goes far beyond the extreme, if I may be allowed such a very Hibernian expression.
To take an argument to its limits to evaluate its worth is perfectly reasonable; but this goes way beyond those limits, if I can use such a uniquely Irish expression.
No object, however minute, can be clearly seen if brought nearer to the eyes than a certain point, because it will be what is technically called out of focus. It is true that this point differs in different individuals, but the average distance of healthy vision is 10 inches. Now, adopting Mr. Merritt's own standard of 2½ inches between the eyes, it is clear that supposing the central point had been rightly selected, the distance between the cameras was only double what might have been taken an extreme distance. It is scarcely necessary to suggest what a person devoid of taste (in which category I am no doubt included) might do in producing monstrosities by adopting the radial method, as such an one is not very likely to produce good results at all.
No object, no matter how small, can be clearly seen if it's brought closer to the eyes than a certain point, because it becomes what’s known as out of focus. While this point varies from person to person, the average distance for healthy vision is 10 inches. Now, using Mr. Merritt’s standard of 2½ inches between the eyes, it’s clear that if the central point had been properly chosen, the distance between the cameras was only double what could have been considered an extreme distance. It’s hardly necessary to suggest what a person lacking taste (of which I’m certainly one) might create by using the radial method, as such a person isn’t likely to achieve good results at all.
I now address myself to another accusation. It is quite true that I am unacquainted with the scholastic dogmas of perspective, but equally true that I am familiar with the facts thereof, as any one must be who has studied optical and geometrical science generally; and while I concur in the propositions as enunciated for a one-eyed picture, I by no means agree to the assumption that the "vanishing points," in the two stereographs taken radially with the necessary precautions, "would be so far apart, that they could not in the stereoscope flow into one;" on the contrary, direct experiment shows me, what reason also suggests, that they do flow into one as completely as in nature when viewed by both eyes.
I’m now responding to another accusation. It’s true that I’m not familiar with the scholastic dogmas of perspective, but I do know the facts about it, just like anyone who has studied optical and geometrical science in general. While I agree with the statements made about a one-eyed image, I don’t agree with the claim that the "vanishing points," in the two stereographs taken radially with the required precautions, "would be so far apart that they could not, in the stereoscope, converge into one." On the contrary, my direct experiments show me, as reason also suggests, that they do converge just as completely as they do in nature when viewed with both eyes.
I put the proposition thus, because I do not hesitate to avow that in nature, as interpreted by binocular vision, these points do not absolutely, but only approximately, flow into one; otherwise one eye would be as effective as two.
I present the idea this way because I am not afraid to admit that in nature, as seen through both eyes, these points do not absolutely, but only roughly, merge into one; otherwise, one eye would be just as good as two.
Lastly, as to the model-like appearance of stereographs taken at a large angle, for the fact I need only refer the objector to most of the beautiful foreign views now so abundant in our opticians' shops: for the reason, is it not palpable that increasing the width of the eyes is analogous to decreasing the size of the object? and if naturally we cannot "perceive at one view three sides of a cake, two heads of a drum, nor any other like absurdity," it is only because we do not use objects sufficiently small to permit us to do so. Even while I am writing this, I have before me a small rectangular inkholder about 1¼ inches square, and distant from my eyes about one foot, in which the very absurd phenomenon complained of does exist, the front, top, and both sides being perfectly visible at once: and being one of those obstinate fellows who will persist in judging personally from experience if possible, I fear I shall be found incorrigible on the points on which your correspondent has so kindly endeavoured to enlighten me.
Lastly, regarding the model-like appearance of stereographs taken at a large angle, I just need to point out the beautiful foreign views that are now so plentiful in our opticians' shops: the fact is, isn't it obvious that widening the angle of view is similar to shrinking the size of the object? And if we naturally cannot "see three sides of a cake, two heads of a drum, or any other similar absurdity" all at once, it's only because we aren't using objects that are sufficiently small to allow us to do so. Even as I write this, I have a small rectangular inkholder about 1¼ inches square, about a foot away from my eyes, where the very absurd phenomenon in question does exist; the front, top, and both sides are perfectly visible at once. And being one of those stubborn people who will insist on judging things personally from experience if possible, I fear I shall prove impossible to convince on the points your correspondent has so kindly tried to explain to me.
To introduce Clouds (Vol. viii., p. 451.) as desired by your correspondent Σ., the negative must be treated in the sky by solution of cyanide of potassium laid on in the form desired with a camel's hair pencil. This discharges a portion of the reduced silver, and allows the light to penetrate; but great care is required to stop the action by well washing in water before the process has gone too far. White clouds are produced by painting them in with a black pigment mixed in size.
To introduce Clouds (Vol. viii., p. 451.) as requested by your correspondent Σ., the negative must be treated in the sky using a solution of potassium cyanide applied in the desired shape with a camel's hair brush. This discharges some of the reduced silver, allowing light to pass through; however, it's crucial to stop the action by thoroughly washing in water before the process goes too far. White clouds are created by painting them in with a black pigment mixed with size.
Replies to Minor Queries.
Death of Edward II. (Vol. viii., p. 387.).—P. C. S. S. has noticed with considerable surprise the very strange assertion of Mr. C. M. Ingleby with reference to the murder of Edward II. at Berkeley Castle, viz. that "Echard and Rapin are silent, both as to the event and the locality." If Mr. Ingleby will again refer to Echard (vol. i. p. 341., edit. 1718) and to Rapin (vol. iii. p. 147., edit. 1749), he will perceive that the two historians record "both the event and the locality."
Death of Edward II. (Vol. viii., p. 387.).—P. C. S. S. has pointed out with considerable surprise the very strange claim by Mr. C. M. Ingleby regarding the murder of Edward II. at Berkeley Castle, namely that "Echard and Rapin are silent, both about the event and the location." If Mr. Ingleby takes another look at Echard (vol. i. p. 341., edit. 1718) and Rapin (vol. iii. p. 147., edit. 1749), he will see that the two historians mention "both the event and the location."
Mr. Ingleby did not perhaps consider that the transaction in question took place during the reign of Edward III.; and is, therefore, not to be sought for at the close of that of Edward II. (where probably Mr. C. M. Ingleby looked for it), but among the occurrences in the time of Edward III. Mr. C. M. Ingleby will assuredly find it there, not only in Echard and Rapin, but in every other History of England since the date of the "event."
Mr. Ingleby might not realize that the event in question happened during the reign of Edward III, so he shouldn't search for it at the end of Edward II. (which is probably where Mr. C. M. Ingleby looked), but instead among the events from the time of Edward III. Mr. C. M. Ingleby will definitely find it there, not just in Echard and Rapin, but in every other history of England since that "event."
Luther no Iconoclast (Vol. viii., p. 335.).—An occasional contributor wishes the Editor to note down this Query. What could have led your correspondent J. G. Fitch to use so peculiarly inappropriate a synonym for Martin Luther as "the great Iconoclast?" Has he any historical evidence for Luther's breaking a single image?
Luther no Iconoclast (Vol. viii., p. 335.).—An occasional contributor asks the Editor to record this question. Why did your correspondent J.G. Fitch choose such an oddly unsuitable term for Martin Luther as "the great Iconoclast?" Does he have any historical proof that Luther ever destroyed a single image?
It is not to defend Luther, but to point out a defect in his teaching, as it is regarded by the adherents of other Protestant churches, that Dr. Maclaine has said, in his note on Book IV. ch. i. § 18. of Mosheim:
It’s not to defend Luther, but to highlight a flaw in his teaching, as perceived by followers of other Protestant churches, that Dr. Maclaine has stated in his note on Book IV. ch. i. § 18. of Mosheim:
"It is evident, from several passages in the writings of Luther, that he was by no means averse to the use of images, but that, on the contrary, he looked upon them as adapted to excite and animate the devotion of the people."
"It's clear from different parts of Luther's writings that he wasn't opposed to using images at all; in fact, he viewed them as a way to inspire and boost the people's devotion."
Mosheim, and Merle D'Aubigné, and probably any other historian of the Reformation in Germany, may be cited as witnesses for the notorious fact, that Carlstadt excited the citizens of Wittemberg to break the images in their churches when Luther was concealed in the Castle of Wartburg, and that he rebuked and checked these proceedings on his return. See Mosheim, as cited before, or D'Aubigné, book IX. ch. vii. and viii.
Mosheim, Merle D'Aubigné, and likely any other historian of the Reformation in Germany can be referenced as evidence of the well-known fact that Carlstadt urged the people of Wittenberg to destroy the images in their churches while Luther was hiding in the Castle of Wartburg, and that he criticized and halted these actions upon his return. See Mosheim, as previously mentioned, or D'Aubigné, book IX. ch. vii. and viii.
Rev. Urban Vigors (Vol. viii., p. 340.).—My great-great-grandmother was a sister of Bishop Vigors, who was consecrated to the see of Leighlin and Ferns, March 8, 1690. He, I know, was a near relative of the Rev. Urban Vigors. An Urban Vigors of Ballycormack, co. Wexford, also married my great-great-aunt, a Miss Thomas, sister of Vigors Thomas, Esq., of Limerick. I should, equally with your correspondent Y. S. M., wish to know any particulars of the "Vigors" family; and should be delighted to enter into correspondence with him.
Rev. Urban Vigors (Vol. viii., p. 340.).—My great-great-grandmother was a sister of Bishop Vigors, who was appointed to the sees of Leighlin and Ferns on March 8, 1690. I know he was a close relative of Rev. Urban Vigors. There was also an Urban Vigors from Ballycormack, County Wexford, who married my great-great-aunt, a Miss Thomas, the sister of Vigors Thomas, Esq., from Limerick. Like your correspondent Y. S. M., I would love to know more about the "Vigors" family and would be happy to correspond with him.
Cornworthy Vicarage, Totnes.
Cornworthy Vicarage, Totnes.
Portrait of Baretti (Vol. VIII., p. 411.).—In reply to Mr. G. R. Corner's Query regarding Sir Joshua Reynolds' picture of Baretti, I can give him the information he requires.
Portrait of Baretti (Vol. VIII., p. 411.).—In response to Mr. G. R. Corner's question about Sir Joshua Reynolds' painting of Baretti, I can provide the information he needs.
This very interesting portrait is now at my brother's, Holland House, Kensington.
This really interesting portrait is now at my brother's place, Holland House, Kensington.
My late father, Lord Holland, had a pretty picture of the late Lord Hertford's mother (I believe), or some near relation of his. Not being connected with that family, my father offered it to Lord Hertford, leaving it to his lordship to give him such picture as he might choose in exchange. Some time afterwards this portrait of Baretti was sent, and was much prized and admired. It represents Baretti reading a small book, which he holds close to his face with both hands; he is in a white coat, and the whole carries with it a certainty of resemblance. This occurred about twenty-five years ago. Perhaps it may interest your readers to learn that our distinguished {478}painter, Watts, painted for my brother, Lord Holland, a portrait of another distinguished Italian, Mr. Panizzi, and pendant to the former. He is represented leaning forward and writing, and the likeness is very striking.
My late father, Lord Holland, had a lovely portrait of the late Lord Hertford's mother (I think), or maybe a close relative of hers. Since we weren't connected to that family, my father offered it to Lord Hertford, suggesting that his lordship could choose any picture in exchange. A while later, this portrait of Baretti arrived, and it was highly valued and admired. It shows Baretti reading a small book, which he holds up close to his face with both hands; he’s wearing a white coat, and you can definitely see the resemblance. This happened about twenty-five years ago. Perhaps your readers would be interested to know that our talented painter, Watts, created a portrait of another distinguished Italian, Mr. Panizzi, for my brother, Lord Holland, to match the first one. He is depicted leaning forward and writing, and the likeness is very striking.
Addison Road.
Addison Road.
Passage in Sophocles.—In Vol. viii., p. 73., appears an article by Mr. Buckton, in which he quotes the following conclusion of a passage in Sophocles:
Passage in Sophocles.—In Vol. viii., p. 73., there is an article by Mr. Buckton, where he quotes the following conclusion of a passage in Sophocles:
"Ὅτῳ φρένας
"Ὅτῳ φρένας"
Θεὸς ἄγει πρὸς ἄταν·
God leads to glory.
Πράσσειν δ' ὀλιγοστὸν χρόνον ἐκτὸς ἄτας."
To act is to spend a brief time outside of destruction.
This, πέτρῳ στάθμην ἁρμόζων, he translates,—
This, πέτρῳ στάθμην ἁρμόζων, he translates,—
"Whose mind the God leads to destruction; but that he (the God) practises this a short time without destroying such an one."
"Whose mind God guides to destruction; but He (God) does this temporarily without fully ruining that person."
But for the Italics it might have been an oversight: they would seem to imply he has some authority for his translation. I have no edition of Sophocles by me to discover, but surely no critical scholar can acquiesce in it. The only active sense of πράσσειν I remember at the moment is to exact. It surely should be translated, "And he, whom the God so leads to ἄτη, fares a very short time without it." The best translation of ἄτη is, perhaps, infatuation. Moreover, how is the above translation reconciled with the very superlative ὀλίγοστον?
But for the italics, it might have been a mistake: they seem to suggest that he has some authority for his translation. I don’t have any edition of Sophocles with me to check, but surely no serious scholar would agree with it. The only active meaning of πράσσειν I can think of right now is to exact. It really should be translated as, "And he, whom the God so leads to foolishness, fares a very short time without it." The best translation of error might be infatuation. Also, how does the translation above fit with the very superlative few?
Brothers of the same Name (Vol. viii., p. 338.).—It is not unusual in old pedigrees to find two brothers or two sisters with the same Christian name; but it is unusual to find more than two living at the same time with only one Christian name between them: this, however, occurs in the family of Gawdy of Gawdy Hall, Norfolk. Thos. Gawdy married three wives, and by each had a son Thomas. The eldest was a serjeant-at-law, and died in 1556. The second was a judge of the Queen's Bench, and died in November, 1587 or 1588. The third is known as Sir Francis Gawdy, Chief Justice of the Common Pleas; but he also was baptized by the name of Thomas. Lord Coke, who succeeded him as Chief Justice, says (Co. Lit. 3. a.):
Brothers of the same Name (Vol. viii., p. 338.).—It’s not uncommon in old family trees to find two brothers or sisters sharing the same first name; however, it’s rare to see more than two living at the same time with only one first name among them. This, however, happened in the Gawdy family of Gawdy Hall, Norfolk. Thos. Gawdy married three wives, and each had a son named Thomas. The eldest became a serjeant-at-law and died in 1556. The second was a judge of the Queen’s Bench and passed away in November, 1587 or 1588. The third is known as Sir Francis Gawdy, Chief Justice of the Common Pleas, but he was also baptized with the name Thomas. Lord Coke, who succeeded him as Chief Justice, says (Co. Lit. 3. a.):
"If a man be baptized by the name of Thomas, and after at his confirmation by the bishop he is named John, he may purchase by his name of confirmation; and this was the case of Sir Francis Gawdie, late C. J. of C. B., whose name of baptism was Thomas, and his name of confirmation Francis; and that name of Francis, by the advice of all the judges in anno 36 Henry VIII. (1544-5), he did bear and after used in all his purchases and grants."
"If a man is baptized with the name Thomas, and later at his confirmation by the bishop he receives the name John, he can make purchases using his confirmation name; this was the case with Sir Francis Gawdie, who was formerly the Chief Justice of the Common Bench, whose baptismal name was Thomas and his confirmation name was Francis. He used the name Francis for all his purchases and grants, following the advice of all the judges in the year 36 Henry VIII (1544-5)."
The opportunity afforded by the Roman Catholic Church of thus changing the baptismal name may help to account for this practice, which probably arose from a desire to continue the particular name in the family. If one of two sons with the same name of baptism died in childhood, the other continued the name: if both lived, one of them might change his name at confirmation. There is no name given at confirmation according to the form of the Church of England.
The chance provided by the Roman Catholic Church to change the baptismal name might explain this practice, which likely started from a wish to keep a specific name in the family. If one of two sons with the same baptismal name died young, the other would carry on the name; if both survived, one could change his name at confirmation. The Church of England does not assign a name at confirmation.
High Dutch and Low Dutch (Vol. viii., p. 413.).—Considerable misapprehension appears to have arisen with regard to these expressions, from the fact of the German word Deutsch being sometimes erroneously understood to mean Dutch. But German scholars very well know that in Germany nothing is more common than to speak of Hoch Deutsch and Nieder Deutsch (High German and Low German), as applied respectively to that language when grammatically spoken and correctly pronounced, and to the bad grammar and worse pronunciation indulged in by many of the provincials, and also by the lower class of people in some of the towns where High German is supposed to prevail. Thus, for examples Dresden is regarded as the head-quarters of Hoch Deutsch, because there the language is spoken and pronounced with the most purity: Berlin, also, as regards the well-educated classes, boasts of the Hoch Deutsch; but the common people (das Volk) of the Prussian capital indulge in a dialect called Nieder Deutsch, and speak and pronounce the language as though they were natives of some remote province. Now, the instance of Berlin I take to be a striking illustration of the meaning of these expressions, as both examples are comprised in the case of this city.
High Dutch and Low Dutch (Vol. viii., p. 413.).—There seems to be a significant misunderstanding about these terms, likely because the German word Deutsch is sometimes mistakenly taken to mean Dutch. However, German scholars know very well that in Germany, it’s quite common to refer to Hoch Deutsch and Nieder Deutsch (High German and Low German). These terms are used to describe the language when it’s spoken correctly and grammatically versus the poor grammar and worse pronunciation often used by many locals and the lower classes in some towns where High German is supposed to be spoken. For instance, Dresden is considered the center of Hoch Deutsch because the language is spoken there with the most clarity. Berlin, among well-educated people, prides itself on Hoch Deutsch; however, the common folk (das Volk) in the Prussian capital speak a dialect known as Nieder Deutsch, pronouncing the language as if they come from a far-off province. In this regard, Berlin serves as a clear example of what these expressions mean, as both cases are evident in this city.
The German word for "German" is Deutsch; for "Dutch" the German is Holländisch; and I presume it is from the similarity of Deutsch and Dutch that this common error is so frequently committed. For the future let it be remembered, that Dutch is a term which has no relation whatever to German; and that "High German" is that language spoken and written in its purity, "Low German" all the dialects and mispronunciations which do not come up to the standard of correctness.
The German word for "German" is Deutsch; for "Dutch," the German term is Holländisch; and I guess the confusion comes from the similarity between Deutsch and Dutch, which leads to this common mistake. From now on, remember that Dutch has nothing to do with German; and "High German" refers to the language spoken and written in its pure form, while "Low German" includes all the dialects and mispronunciations that don't meet the standard of correctness.
8. Arthur Street.
Arthur Street.
Translations of the Prayer Book into French (Vol. vii., p. 382.; Vol. viii., p. 343.).—Besides the editions already mentioned, a 4to. one was published at London in 1689, printed by R. Everingham, and sold by R. Bentley and M. Magnes. Prefixed to it is the placet of the king, dated 6th October, 1662, with the subsequent approbation of Stradling, chaplain to Gilbert (Sheldon), Bishop of London, dated 6th April, 1663.
Translations of the Prayer Book into French (Vol. vii., p. 382.; Vol. viii., p. 343.).—In addition to the editions already mentioned, a quarto edition was published in London in 1689, printed by R. Everingham, and sold by R. Bentley and M. Magnes. It includes the king's approval, dated October 6, 1662, along with the subsequent endorsement from Stradling, chaplain to Gilbert (Sheldon), Bishop of London, dated April 6, 1663.
I presume that there were other editions between the years 1663 and 1689.
I assume there were other editions between 1663 and 1689.
Divining-rod (Vol. viii., p. 293.).—For a full account of the divining rod see La Physique occulte, ou Traité de la Baguette Divinatoire, &c., par Père L. de Vallemont, a work by no means uncommon, having passed through several editions. Mine is "à Paris, chez Jean Boudot, avec priv. 1709, in 12o. avec figures," with the addition of a "Traité de la Connoissance des Causes Magnétiques, &c., par un Curieux."
Divining-rod (Vol. viii., p. 293.).—For a detailed account of the divining rod, see La Physique occulte, ou Traité de la Baguette Divinatoire, &c., by Père L. de Vallemont, a work that's quite common and has gone through several editions. Mine is "à Paris, chez Jean Boudot, avec priv. 1709, in 12o, with illustrations," along with a "Traité de la Connoissance des Causes Magnétiques, &c., by a Curieux."
A Cornish lady informs me that the Cornish miners to this day use the divining-rod in the way represented in fig. 1. of the above-mentioned work.
A Cornish lady tells me that the Cornish miners still use the divining rod in the way shown in fig. 1 of the work mentioned above.
In the 351st number of the Monthly Magazine, dated March 1st, 1821, there is a letter to the editor from W. Partridge, dated Boxbridge, Gloucester, giving several instances of his having successfully used the divining-rod for the purpose of discovering water. He says the gift is not possessed by more than one in two thousand, and attributes the power to electricity. Those persons in whose hands it will work must possess a redundancy of that fluid. He also states that metals are discovered by the same means.
In the 351st issue of the Monthly Magazine, dated March 1st, 1821, there is a letter to the editor from W. Partridge, written from Boxbridge, Gloucester, sharing several examples of how he successfully used a divining rod to find water. He mentions that this ability is only found in about one in two thousand people and believes the power comes from electricity. He adds that those who can make it work must have a surplus of that energy. He also notes that metals can be found using the same method.
Slow-worm Superstition (Vol. vii., p. 33.).—The belief that the slow-worm cannot die until sunset prevails in Dorsetshire. In the New Forest the same superstition exists with regard to the brown adder. Walking in the heathy country between Beaulieu and Christ Church I saw a very large snake of this kind, recently beaten to death by the peasant boys, and on remarking that the lower jaw continued to move convulsively, I was told it would do so "till the moon was up."
Slow-worm Superstition (Vol. vii., p. 33.).—In Dorsetshire, there's a belief that slow-worms can't die until sunset. The same superstition is found in the New Forest regarding the brown adder. While walking in the heathland between Beaulieu and Christ Church, I saw a large snake of this kind that had recently been killed by peasant boys. When I noted that its lower jaw was still moving convulsively, I was told it would keep doing that "until the moon was up."
An aged woman, now deceased, who had when young been severely bitten by a snake, told me she always felt a severe pain and swelling near where the wound had been, on the anniversary of the occurrence. Is this common? and can it be accounted for?
An elderly woman, now passed away, who had been bitten by a snake in her youth, told me she usually felt intense pain and swelling near the spot where the wound had been every year on the anniversary of the incident. Is this common? And can it be explained?
Pimperne, Dorset.
Pimperne, Dorset.
Ravailliac (Vol. viii., p. 219.).—The destruction of the pyramid erected at Paris upon the murder of Henry IV., is mentioned by Thuanus, Hist., lib. 134. cap. 9. In your correspondent's Query, Thesaur. is, I presume, misprinted for Thuan.
Ravailliac (Vol. viii., p. 219.).—The destruction of the pyramid built in Paris after the murder of Henry IV. is noted by Thuanus, Hist., lib. 134. cap. 9. In your correspondent's Query, I think Thesaur. is likely a typo for Thuan.
Lines on the Institution of the Garter (Vol. viii., p. 182.).—A. B. R. says, "as also from the proverbial expression used in Scotland, and to be found in Scott's Works, of 'casting a leggin girth,' as synonymous with a female 'faux pas.'" I may mention to your correspondent (if he is not already aware) that the expression is taken from Allan Ramsay's continuation of Christ's Kirk on the Green (edit. Leith, 1814, 1 vol. p. 101.):
Lines on the Institution of the Garter (Vol. viii., p. 182.).—A. B. R. says, "as well as from the common saying used in Scotland, which you can find in Scott's Works, 'casting a leggin girth,' meaning a female 'faux pas.'" I should mention to your correspondent (if he doesn't already know) that the phrase comes from Allan Ramsay's continuation of Christ's Kirk on the Green (edit. Leith, 1814, 1 vol. p. 101.):
"Or bairns can read, they first maun spell,
"Or children can read, they must first spell,
I learn'd this frae my mammy;
I learned this from my mom;
And coost a legen girth mysell,
And cost a legend girth myself,
Lang or I married Tammie."
"Lang or I married Tammie."
and is explained by the author in a note, "Like a tub that loses one of its bottom hoops." In the west of Scotland the phrase is now restricted to a young woman who has had an illegitimate child, or what is more commonly termed "a misfortune," and it is probable never had another meaning. Legen or leggen is not understood to have any affinity in its etymology to the word leg, but is laggen, that part of the staves which projects from the bottom of the barrel, or of the child's luggie, out of which he sups his oatmeal parritch; and the girth, gird, or hoop, that by which the vessel at this particular place is firmest bound together. Burns makes a fine and emphatic use of the word laggen in the "Birthday Address," in speaking of the "Royal lasses dainty" (Cunninghame, edit. 1826, vol. ii. p. 329.):
and is explained by the author in a note, "Like a tub that loses one of its bottom hoops." In the west of Scotland, the phrase now refers to a young woman who has had an illegitimate child, or what is more commonly called "a misfortune," and it likely never had any other meaning. Legen or leggen is not believed to have any connection in its origin to the word leg, but is laggen, which refers to the part of the staves that sticks out from the bottom of the barrel, or from the child's luggie, from which he eats his oatmeal parritch; and the girth, gird, or hoop, that keeps the vessel securely bound together at this specific spot. Burns makes a fine and impactful use of the word laggen in the "Birthday Address," when he speaks of the "Royal lasses dainty" (Cunninghame, edit. 1826, vol. ii. p. 329.):
"God bless you a', consider now,
"God bless you all, think about this now,"
Ye're unco muckle dantet:
You're really well dressed:
But ere the course o' life be thro'
But before the course of life is done
It may be bitter santet.
It may be bitter magic.
An I hae seen their coggie fou,
An I have seen their cup full,
That yet hae tarrow't at it;
That yet have struggled with it;
But or the day was done, I trow,
But before the day was over, I think,
The laggen they hae clautet."
The laggen they have clutched.
which means, that at last, whether through pride, hunger, or long fasting, the appetite had become so keen, that all, even to the last particle of the parritch, was clautet, scartit, or scraped from the bottom of the coggie, and to its inmost recesses surrounded by the laggen girth. Of the motto of the garter, "Honi soit qui mal y pense," I have heard a burlesque translation known but to few, in "Honeys sweet quo' Mally Spence," synonymous with Proverbs, chap. ix. verse 17: "Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant."
which means that finally, whether from pride, hunger, or long fasting, the appetite had become so sharp that everything, even the last bit of the parritch, was clautet, scartit, or scraped from the bottom of the coggie, and from its deepest corners surrounded by the laggen girth. I’ve heard a humorous translation of the garter’s motto, "Honi soit qui mal y pense," known only to a few, in "Honeys sweet quo' Mally Spence," which is similar to Proverbs, chap. ix. verse 17: "Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant."
Passage in Bacon (Vol. viii., p. 303.).—I had, partly from inadvertence, and partly from a belief that a tautology would be created by a recurrence to the idea of death, after the words "mortis terrore carentem," in the preceding line, understood the verse in question to mean, "which regards length of life as the last of Nature's gifts." On reconsideration, however, I do not doubt that the received interpretation, which makes spatium extremum equivalent to finem, is the correct one.
Passage in Bacon (Vol. viii., p. 303.).—I had, partly due to oversight and partly because I thought mentioning death again after "mortis terrore carentem" in the previous line would create redundancy, interpreted the verse in question to mean "which sees the length of life as the final gift of Nature." Upon re-evaluating, though, I now believe that the widely accepted interpretation, which equates spatium extremum with finem, is the accurate one.
What Day is it at our Antipodes? (Vol. viii., p. 102.).—A person sailing to our Antipodes westward will lose twelve hours; by sailing thither eastward he will gain twelve hours. If {480}both meet at the same hour, say eleven o'clock, the one will reckon 11 A.M., the other 11 P.M.
What Day is it at our Antipodes? (Vol. viii., p. 102.).—A person sailing to our Antipodes to the west will lose twelve hours; if they sail there to the east, they will gain twelve hours. If {480} both arrive at the same time, let’s say eleven o’clock, one will say it’s 11 A.M., while the other will say it’s 11 PM
Calves' Head Club (Vol. viii., p. 315.).—In Hone's Every Day Book, vol. ii. pp. 158, 159, 160., some more information is given on the interesting event referred to in the Note made by Mr. E. G. Ballard. A print is given of the scene; and the obnoxious toasts are also quoted; they are: "The pious memory of Oliver Cromwell;" "Damn—n to the race of the Stuarts;" "The glorious year 1648;" "The man in the mask," &c. The print is dated 1734, which proves that the meeting at which the disturbance arose was not the first which had taken place.
Calves' Head Club (Vol. viii., p. 315.).—In Hone's Every Day Book, vol. ii. pp. 158, 159, 160., there’s more information about the interesting event mentioned in the Note made by Mr. E.G. Ballard. A print of the scene is included, and the offensive toasts are also listed; they are: "The pious memory of Oliver Cromwell;" "Damn—n to the race of the Stuarts;" "The glorious year 1648;" "The man in the mask," etc. The print is dated 1734, which shows that the meeting where the disturbance occurred was not the first one that had happened.
Bridgewater.
Bridgewater.
Heraldic Query (Vol. viii., p. 219.).—Although A. was killed in open rebellion, I think his armorial bearings were not forfeited unless he was subsequently attainted by act of parliament; and even in that case it is possible that the act contained a provision that the penalty should not extend to the prejudice of any other person than the offender. Assuming that A. was not attainted, or that the consequences of his attainder were thus restricted to himself, or that his attainder has been reversed, it is clear that his lawful posterity are still entitled to his arms, notwithstanding the acceptance by his grandson C. of a new grant, which obviously could no more affect the title to the ancient arms than the creation of a modern barony can destroy the right of its recipient to an older one. The descendants of C. being thus entitled to both coats, could, I imagine, without difficulty obtain a recognition of their right; and I think they might either use the ancient arms alone, or the ancient and the modern arms quarterly, precedence being given to the former. The proper course would be to seek the licence of the crown for the resumption of the ancient surname, as well as of the arms. Such permission would, I apprehend, be now conceded, even though it should appear that the arms were really forfeited.
Heraldic Query (Vol. viii., p. 219.).—Even though A. was killed in open rebellion, I believe his coat of arms wasn't forfeited unless he was later declared guilty by an act of parliament; and even then, it's possible that the act included a clause stating that the penalty wouldn't disadvantage anyone other than the offender. Assuming A. wasn't declared guilty, or that the effects of his declaration were limited to himself, or that his declaration has been overturned, it's clear that his legitimate descendants still have the right to his arms, despite his grandson C. accepting a new grant, which obviously wouldn't change the claim to the old arms any more than the creation of a new barony would eliminate the recipient’s right to an older one. The descendants of C., being entitled to both coats, could likely get their rights recognized without much trouble; and I think they could choose to use either the old arms alone or the old and new arms together, with the old arms taking precedence. The best approach would be to seek permission from the crown to restore the ancient surname and the arms. I believe such permission would likely be granted, even if it turned out that the arms were actually forfeited.
Emberton, Bucks.
Emberton, Buckinghamshire.
The Temple Lands in Scotland (Vol. viii., p. 317.).—These lands, or a portion of them, were acquired, and afterwards transferred by sale, to Mr. Gracie, by James Maidment, Esq., the eminent Scottish antiquary, who, in 1828-29, privately printed—
The Temple Lands in Scotland (Vol. viii., p. 317.).—These lands, or some of them, were purchased and later sold by Mr. Gracie, from James Maidment, Esq., the well-known Scottish antiquarian, who privately published in 1828-29—
"Templaria: Papers Relative to the History, Privileges, and Possessions of the Scottish Knights Templars, and their Successors, the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem, with Notes," &c.
"Templaria: Documents on the History, Privileges, and Properties of the Scottish Knights Templars and their Successors, the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem, with Notes," &c.
This will no doubt contain all that your correspondent Abredonensis could desire upon the subject, provided he can obtain it; for the work, professing to be printed by the author for presents, is confined to twenty-five copies, and must therefore be rare. In 1831 was published by Stevenson, Edinburgh, an Historical Account of Linlithgowshire, by the late John Penney.[9] This is edited by Mr. Maidment, and contains a chapter entitled an "Account of the Transmission of the United Estates of the Templars and Hospitallers, after the dissolution of the Order in the reign of Queen Mary;" and although the object of the editor is to notice the charters connected with Linlithgowshire, the book contains a sketch of the general history of the lands in question, abridged from the Templaria.
This will definitely include everything your correspondent Abredonensis could want on the topic, as long as he can get it; since the work claims to be printed by the author for gifts, it's limited to twenty-five copies and is therefore quite rare. In 1831, Stevenson, Edinburgh published an Historical Account of Linlithgowshire by the late John Penney.[9] This was edited by Mr. Maidment and includes a chapter titled "Account of the Transmission of the United Estates of the Templars and Hospitallers, after the dissolution of the Order in the reign of Queen Mary." Although the editor's aim is to highlight the charters related to Linlithgowshire, the book also offers a summary of the general history of the lands in question, condensed from the Templaria.
Sir John Vanbrugh (Vol. viii., p. 65. &c.).—In An Account of the Life and Death of Mr. Matthew Henry, published in the year 1716, his biographer having related that he was chosen a minister of a congregation of Dissenters in the city of Chester, and that he went there to reside on the first day of June, 1687, goes on to state (p. 75.):
Sir John Vanbrugh (Vol. viii., p. 65. &c.).—In An Account of the Life and Death of Mr. Matthew Henry, published in 1716, the author of the biography notes that Matthew Henry was appointed as a minister for a group of Dissenters in Chester and that he moved there on June 1, 1687. He continues to explain (p. 75.):
"That city was then very happy in several worthy gentlemen that had habitations there; they were not altogether strangers to Mr. Henry before he came to live among them, but now they came to be his very intimate acquaintance; some of these, as Alderman Mainwaring and Mr. Vanbrugh, father to Sir John Vanbrugh, were in communion with the Church of England, but they heard Mr. Henry on the week-day lectures, and always treated him with great and serious respect."
"That city was pretty lucky to have several respected men living there; they weren't total strangers to Mr. Henry before he moved in, but he became very good friends with them. Some of these men, like Alderman Mainwaring and Mr. Vanbrugh, who was the father of Sir John Vanbrugh, were members of the Church of England, but they attended Mr. Henry's weekday lectures and always treated him with a lot of respect."
This evidence serves to show that a Mr. Vanbrugh, who was living in Chester in 1687, was the father of Sir John Vanbrugh. I have been told that in former times there was a sugar-bakery at Chester. Did the father of Sir John Vanbrugh carry on that business at Chester during any period of his residence there?
This evidence shows that a Mr. Vanbrugh, who was living in Chester in 1687, was the father of Sir John Vanbrugh. I've heard that there used to be a sugar-bakery in Chester. Did Sir John Vanbrugh's father run that business in Chester at any time during his stay there?
Sir Arthur Aston (Vol. viii., p. 126.).—In reference to the Query of your correspondent Chartham, I take leave to refer him to Playfair's Baronetage, vol. ii. p. 257., where a pedigree of that ancient family is inserted. In p. 261. is a note, by which it appears that the said Sir Arthur Aston had a daughter Elizabeth, born in Russia, and married to James Thompson of Joyce Grove in Berkshire.
Sir Arthur Aston (Vol. viii., p. 126.).—In response to your correspondent Chartham's query, I would like to point him to Playfair's Baronetage, vol. ii. p. 257., where you'll find a pedigree of that ancient family. On p. 261., there is a note indicating that Sir Arthur Aston had a daughter named Elizabeth, who was born in Russia and married James Thompson of Joyce Grove in Berkshire.
In addition thereto, I recollect seeing the copy of a deed of sale, dated April, 1637, by which it appears that Nicholas Hercy, of Nettlebed, in co. Oxon., sold to James Thompson of Wallingford, in co. Berkshire, "Joys Grove," in Nettlebed aforesaid; and there is united with the same James Thompson, apparently as a trustee, "George Tattersall the younger, of Finchampstead in said co. of Berkshire."
In addition, I remember seeing a copy of a sales deed dated April 1637, showing that Nicholas Hercy from Nettlebed in Oxfordshire sold "Joys Grove" in Nettlebed to James Thompson from Wallingford in Berkshire. Joining James Thompson, seemingly as a trustee, is "George Tattersall the younger from Finchampstead in Berkshire."
I also take leave to refer your correspondent to Lysons's Environs of London, vol. ii. p. 393., under head of "Fulham," where it is stated that Sir Arthur Aston's father resided in that parish.
I’d like to point your correspondent to Lysons's Environs of London, vol. ii. p. 393., under the section "Fulham," where it mentions that Sir Arthur Aston's father lived in that parish.
Nugget (Vol. viii., p. 357.).—Colonel Mundy, in Our Antipodes, says that the word nugget was, before the days of gold digging, used by the farmers of Australia to express a small thick bullock, such as our English farmers would call a lumpy one, or a little great one.
Nugget (Vol. viii., p. 357.).—Colonel Mundy, in Our Antipodes, states that the word nugget was used by Australian farmers, before the gold rush, to describe a small, stocky bullock, similar to how English farmers might refer to one as a lumpy animal or a little heavy one.
Miscellaneous.
BOOKS AND ODD VOLUMES WANTED TO PURCHASE.
Ford's Handbook of Spain. 1st Edition.
Ford's Spain Guide. 1st Edition.
Cotton's Fasti Ecclesiæ Hiberniæ. Parts III., VI., VII., and VIII.
Cotton's Fasti Ecclesiæ of Ireland. Parts III., VI., VII., and VIII.
Torriano Piazza Universale Di Proverbi Italiani. London, 1668. Folio.
Torriano Universal Piazza of Italian Proverbs. London, 1668. Folio.
Bibliotheca Topographica Britannica. Vol. IX.
Bibliotheca Topographica Britannica. Vol. 9.
Encyclopædia Britannica. 7th Edition. Vol. XXII., Part 2.
Encyclopedia Britannica. 7th Edition. Vol. XXII., Part 2.
*** Letters, stating particulars and lowest prices, carriage free, to be sent to Mr. Bell, Publisher of "NOTES AND QUERIES." 186. Fleet Street.
*** Letters, detailing specifics and lowest prices, shipping included, should be sent to Mr. Bell, Publisher of "NOTES AND QUERIES." 186. Fleet Street.
Particulars of Price, &c. of the following Books to be sent direct to the gentlemen by whom they are required, and whose names and addresses are given for that purpose:
Particulars of Price, &c. of the following books will be sent directly to the gentlemen who requested them, and their names and addresses are provided for that purpose:
Wellington Dispatches. 13 Vols. Vols. II., III., and Index. (The full price will be given.)
Wellington Updates. 13 Volumes. Volumes II., III., and Index. (The complete price will be provided.)
Southey's Doctor. Vols. III. and IV.
Southey's Doctor. Volumes III and IV.
Patrick's Mensa Mystica.
Patrick's Mensa Mystica.
Strickland's Queens of England. Vols. III., IV., V., VI., VII., VIII., and X.
Strickland's Queens of England. Vols. III., IV., V., VI., VII., VIII., and X.
Wanted by A. Holden, Bookseller, Exeter.
Wanted by A. Holden, Bookseller, Exeter.
Two Dialogues in the Elysian Fields, between Card. Wolsey and Card. Ximenes. To which are added Historical Accounts of Wolsey's two Colleges and the Town of Ipswich. By Joseph Grove. London, 1761. 8vo.
Two Conversations in the Elysian Fields, between Cardinal Wolsey and Cardinal Ximenes. To which are added Historical Accounts of Wolsey's two Colleges and the Town of Ipswich. By Joseph Grove. London, 1761. 8vo.
Wanted by W. S. Fitch, Ipswich.
Wanted by W. S. Fitch, Ipswich.
Addison's Works. First Edition.
Addison's Works. First Edition.
Jones' (of Nayland) Works. 13 Vols. 8vo.
Jones' Works (of Nayland). 13 Vols. 8vo.
Wilkinson's Ancient Egypt. Vols. IV. and V.
Wilkinson's Ancient Egypt. Vols. IV. and V.
Byron's Life and Letters. 3 Vols. 8vo.
Byron's Life and Letters. 3 Volumes. 8vo.
Wanted by Simms & Son, Booksellers, Bath.
Wanted by Simms & Son, Booksellers, Bath.
Kant's Logic, translated by John Richardson.
Kant's Logic, translated by John Richardson.
Historic Certainties by Aristarchus Newlight.
Historic Certainties by Aristarchus New Light.
Songs—"The Boatmen shout." Attwood. "Ah! godan lor felicita" (Faust). Spohr.
Tracks—"The Boatmen shout." Attwood. "Ah! godan lor felicita" (Faust). Spohr.
Wanted by C. Mansfield Ingleby, Birmingham.
Wanted by C. Mansfield Ingleby, Birmingham.
Chapman's Architecturiæ Navales Mercaturiæ. 1768. Folio. Published in Sweden.
Chapman's Architectural Navigation for Trade. 1768. Folio. Published in Sweden.
Wanted by Robert Stewart, Bookseller, Paisley.
Wanted by Robert Stewart, Bookseller, Paisley.
The Spectator, printed by Alex. Lawrie & Co., London, 1804. Vols. I., II., III., VI., VII., and VIII.
The Spectator, published by Alex. Lawrie & Co., London, 1804. Vols. I., II., III., VI., VII., and VIII.
Wanted by J. T. Cheetham, Firwood, Chadderton, near Oldham.
Wanted by J. T. Cheetham, Firwood, Chadderton, near Oldham.
Notices to Correspondents.
We beg to call the special attention of such of our readers as are Autograph Collectors to the advertisement which appears in the present Number, descriptive of certain family and historical papers, which have been missed within the last twelve months from the proper custody, and shall only be too glad to hear that by so doing we have at all contributed to their recovery.
We would like to draw the attention of our readers who are autograph collectors to the ad in this issue, describing some family and historical papers that have been lost over the past year. We would be very happy to hear that our efforts have helped in their recovery.
Books Wanted. So many of our Correspondents seem disposed to avail themselves of our plan of placing the booksellers in direct communication with them, that we find ourselves compelled to limit each list of books to two insertions. We would also express a hope that those gentlemen who may at once succeed in obtaining any desired volumes will be good enough to notify the same to us, in order that such books may not unnecessarily appear in such list even a second time.
Books Needed. Many of our correspondents are eager to take advantage of our plan to connect them directly with booksellers, so we have to limit each list of books to two postings. We also hope that those who are successful in finding the books they want will kindly let us know, so we don’t have to list those books again unnecessarily.
St. John's, who asks about the Stafford Knot, will see by our last Number, p. 454., that it is the badge or cognizance of the Earls of Stafford.
St. John's, who inquires about the Stafford Knot, will see in our last issue, p. 454., that it serves as the emblem or symbol of the Earls of Stafford.
Mr. Van Laun's Query as to the derivation of Huguenot is anticipated in our 6th Vol., p. 317. Will the Note there given help him to a satisfactory solution?
Mr. Van Laun's Query about the origin of Huguenot is addressed in our 6th Vol., p. 317. Will the note provided there assist him in finding a satisfactory answer?
The Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs, 1686.—The loan of this volume is offered by T. D. to the Correspondent who advertised for it some time since in our columns.
The Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs, 1686.—This volume is available for loan from T. D. to the Correspondent who requested it a while ago in our columns.
Amicus Veritatis, who inquires respecting Cleanliness is next to Godliness, is referred to our 4th Vol., p. 491., for its probable origin.
Friend of Truth, wants to know Cleanliness is next to Godliness, is directed to 4th Vol., p. 491., for its likely origin.
E. G. Ballard. The curious tenure of being the King's Vautrarius, kindly forwarded by this Correspondent, is already printed in Blount's Fragmenta Antiquitates, p. 142., ed. 1784.
J.G. Ballard. The interesting period of being the King's Vautrarius, generously sent by this Correspondent, is already published in Blount's Fragmenta Antiquitates, p. 142., ed. 1784.
C. E. F. We would strongly recommend our Correspondent to adopt the paper process described by Dr. Diamond in our first Number for the present year (with correction of using the gallic acid, which, as stated in a subsequent Number, was by accident omitted). Recent experience has more than ever convinced us that if the method there laid down be strictly followed, the photographer will not meet with failures.
C. E. F. We highly suggest that our Correspondent adopts the paper process outlined by Dr. Diamond in our first issue of this year (with the correction regarding the use of gallic acid, which, as mentioned in a later issue, was accidentally left out). Recent experiences have further convinced us that if the method described there is strictly followed, the photographer will avoid failures.
An Amateur (Helston). Mr. Lyte is at present abroad, or we are sure he would readily answer the Query of our Correspondent, as to whether the chloride of barium recommended by him at p. 252., and the nitrate of lead at p. 373., are to be the crystallised or liquid preparations.
A Beginner (Helston). Mr. Lyte is currently overseas, or we know he would quickly respond to our Correspondent's question about whether the barium chloride he mentioned on p. 252 and the lead nitrate on p. 373 are supposed to be the crystallized or liquid forms.
An Amateur Photographer (Manchester). If you will transmit us a specimen of the failures which you mention, especially of the waved appearance, we will do the best to answer your Queries: it is impossible otherwise satisfactorily to do so.
A Hobbyist Photographer (Manchester). If you could send us an example of the issues you mentioned, particularly the wavy look, we will do our best to answer your questions: it's impossible to respond adequately otherwise.
M. A. Always use your hyposulphite of soda saturated; it does not reduce the tone of pictures near so much as when it is used dilute.
M. A. Always use your saturated hyposulphite of soda; it doesn't reduce the tone of pictures nearly as much as when it's used diluted.
"Notes and Queries" is published at noon on Friday, so that the Country Booksellers may receive Copies in that night's parcels, and deliver them to their Subscribers on the Saturday.
"Notes and Questions" is published at noon on Friday, so that the country booksellers can receive copies in that night's shipments and deliver them to their subscribers on Saturday.
Now ready, Two New Volumes (price 28s. cloth) of THE JUDGES OF ENGLAND and the Courts at Westminster. By EDWARD FOSS. F.S.A.
Now available, Two New Volumes (price 28s. cloth) of THE JUDGES OF ENGLAND and the Courts at Westminster. By EDWARD FOSS. F.S.A.
Volume Three, 1272-1377.
Volume Three, 1272-1377.
Volume Four, 1377-1485.
Volume Four, 1377-1485.
Lately published, price 28s. cloth,
Just published, price 28s. cloth,
Volume One, 1066-1199.
Volume One, 1066-1199.
Volume Two, 1199-1272.
Volume Two, 1199-1272.
"A book which is essentially sound and truthful, and must therefore take its stand in the permanent literature of our country."—Gent. Mag.
"A book that is solid and truthful, and deserves its spot in our country's enduring literature."—Gent. Mag.
London: LONGMAN & CO.
London: Longman & Co.
12mo., cloth, with Frontispiece, 2s. 6d.
12mo, cloth, with Frontispiece, 2s. 6d.
THE VICAR AND HIS DUTIES: being Sketches of Clerical Life in a Manufacturing Town Parish. By the REV. ALFRED GATTY.
THE VICAR AND HIS DUTIES: being Sketches of Clerical Life in a Manufacturing Town Parish. By the REV. ALFRED GATTY.
"As much a true effigy, though taken with pen and ink, as if Mr. Gatty had put that capital parish priest, the Vicar of Leeds, before his camera. To the many friends of Dr. Hook this little volume will be deeply interesting."—Notes and Queries.
"It's just as much a true likeness, even though made with pen and ink, as if Mr. Gatty had taken a photograph of the well-known parish priest, the Vicar of Leeds. This small book will be very interesting to the numerous friends of Dr. Hook."—Notes and Queries.
"It unites the merit of lively and faithful sketching, sound principles, and popular style."—Churchman's Magazine.
"It brings together the benefits of lively and precise sketching, strong principles, and an easy-to-read style."—Churchman's Magazine.
GEORGE BELL, 186. Fleet Street.
GEORGE BELL, 186 Fleet St.
SUPPLEMENT TO DR. OLIVER'S MONASTICON DIŒCESIS EXONIENSIS.
SUPPLEMENT TO DR. OLIVER'S MONASTICON DIOCESE OF EXETER.
In the Press, and will be published, in 1 vol. folio, price 10s. 6d.
In the Press, and will be published in 1 vol. folio, price 10s. 6d.
A SUPPLEMENT TO THE MONASTICON DIŒCESIS EXONIENSIS. Being a Collection of Records and Instruments further illustrating the Ancient Conventual, Collegiate, and Eleemosynary Foundations in the Counties of Devon and Cornwall. By GEORGE OLIVER, D.D. To correspond exactly in size, paper, and type with the original work, and to contain a large folding Map of the Diocese of Exeter at the time of the Dissolution of Monasteries. When published, the price will be raised.
A SUPPLEMENT TO THE MONASTICON DIŒCESIS EXONIENSIS. This is a collection of records and documents that further illustrate the ancient conventual, collegiate, and charitable foundations in Devon and Cornwall. By GEORGE OLIVER, D.D. It matches the original work in size, paper, and type, and includes a large folding map of the Diocese of Exeter during the Dissolution of the Monasteries. The price will increase once published.
Subscribers' Names received by A. HOLDEN, Bookseller, Exeter.
Subscribers' Names received by A. HOLDEN, Bookseller, Exeter.
XYLO-IODIDE OF SILVER, exclusively used at all the Photographic Establishments.—The superiority of this preparation is now universally acknowledged. Testimonials from the best Photographers and principal scientific men of the day, warrant the assertion, that hitherto no preparation has been discovered which produces uniformly such perfect pictures, combined with the greatest rapidity of action. In all cases where a quantity is required, the two solutions may be had at Wholesale price in separate Bottles, in which state it may be kept for years, and Exported to any Climate. Full instructions for use.
XYLO-IODIDE OF SILVER, exclusively used at all Photography Studios.—The excellence of this product is now widely recognized. Reviews from top photographers and leading scientists support the claim that until now, no product has been found that consistently creates such flawless images, while also acting with incredible speed. In cases where larger quantities are needed, both solutions are available at wholesale prices in separate bottles, allowing for long-term storage and export to any climate. Complete instructions for use are included.
Caution.—Each Bottle is Stamped with a Red Label bearing my name, RICHARD W. THOMAS, Chemist, 10. Pall Mall, to counterfeit which is felony.
Warning.—Each bottle is labeled with a red sticker showing my name, RICHARD W. THOMAS, Chemist, 10 Pall Mall, and faking this is a felony.
CYANOGEN SOAP: for removing all kinds of Photographic Stains. Beware of purchasing spurious and worthless imitations of this valuable detergent. The Genuine is made only by the Inventor, and is secured with a Red Label bearing this Signature and Address, RICHARD W. THOMAS, CHEMIST, 10. PALL MALL, Manufacturer of Pure Photographic Chemicals: and may be procured of all respectable Chemists, in Pots at 1s., 2s., and 3s. 6d. each, through MESSRS. EDWARDS, 67. St. Paul's Churchyard; and MESSRS. BARCLAY & CO., 95. Farringdon Street, Wholesale Agents.
CYANOGEN SOAP: for removing all types of photographic stains. Be careful not to buy fake and worthless imitations of this valuable detergent. The genuine product is made only by the inventor and is secured with a red label featuring this signature and address: RICHARD W. THOMAS, CHEMIST, 10 PALL MALL, Manufacturer of Pure Photographic Chemicals. It can be purchased from all reputable chemists, in pots at 1s., 2s., and 3s. 6d. each, through MESSRS. EDWARDS, 67 St. Paul's Churchyard; and MESSRS. BARCLAY & CO., 95 Farringdon Street, Wholesale Agents.
PHOTOGRAPHIC PICTURES.—A Selection of the above beautiful Productions (comprising Views in VENICE, PARIS, RUSSIA, NUBIA, &c.) may be seen at BLAND & LONG'S, 153. Fleet Street, where may also be procured Apparatus of every Description, and pure Chemicals for the practice of Photography in all its Branches.
PHOTOGRAPHIC PICTURES.—A selection of these beautiful works (including views in VENICE, PARIS, RUSSIA, NUBIA, etc.) can be seen at BLAND & LONG'S, 153 Fleet Street, where you can also find equipment of every kind and pure chemicals for practicing photography in all its forms.
Calotype, Daguerreotype, and Glass Pictures for the Stereoscope.
Calotype, Daguerreotype, and Glass Pictures for the Stereoscope.
*** Catalogues may be had on application.
*** Catalogs are available upon request.
BLAND & LONG, Opticians, Philosophical and Photographical Instrument Makers, and Operative Chemists, 153. Fleet Street.
BLAND & LONG, Opticians, Philosophical and Photographic Instrument Makers, and Operating Chemists, 153 Fleet Street.
PHOTOGRAPHY.—HORNE & CO.'S Iodized Collodion, for obtaining Instantaneous Views, and Portraits in from three to thirty seconds, according to light.
PHOTOGRAPHY.—HORNE & CO.'S Iodized Collodion, for capturing Instantaneous Views and Portraits in three to thirty seconds, depending on the lighting.
Portraits obtained by the above, for delicacy of detail rival the choicest Daguerreotypes, specimens of which may be seen at their Establishment.
Portraits obtained through the methods mentioned above, for their fine details, are comparable to the best Daguerreotypes, examples of which can be found at their establishment.
Also every description of Apparatus, Chemicals, &c. &c. used in this beautiful Art.—123. and 121. Newgate Street.
Also, every description of equipment, chemicals, etc., used in this beautiful art.—123 and 121 Newgate Street.
PHOTOGRAPHIC CAMERAS.—OTTEWILL'S REGISTERED DOUBLE-BODIED FOLDING CAMERA, is superior to every other form of Camera, for the Photographic Tourist, from its capability of Elongation or Contraction to any Focal Adjustment, its Portability, and its adaptation for taking either Views or Portraits.—The Trade supplied.
PHOTOGRAPHIC CAMERAS.—OTTEWILL'S REGISTERED DOUBLE-BODIED FOLDING CAMERA is better than any other type of camera for the photography enthusiast. It can easily be adjusted to any focal length, is portable, and works well for both scenery and portraits.—Available for purchase.
Every Description of Camera, or Slides, Tripod Stands, Printing Frames, &c., may be obtained at his MANUFACTORY, Charlotte Terrace, Barnsbury Road, Islington.
Every description of camera, slides, tripod stands, printing frames, etc., can be found at his factory, Charlotte Terrace, Barnsbury Road, Islington.
New Inventions, Models, &c., made to order or from Drawings.
New inventions, models, etc., created to order or from designs.
IMPROVEMENT IN COLLODION.—J. B. HOCKIN & CO., Chemists, 289. Strand. have, by an improved mode of Iodizing, succeeded in producing a Collodion equal, they may say superior, in sensitiveness and density of Negative, to any other hitherto published; without diminishing the keeping properties and appreciation of half tint for which their manufacture has been esteemed.
IMPROVEMENT IN COLLODION.—J. B. HOCKIN & CO., Chemists, 289. Strand. have developed a better method of iodizing that has allowed them to create a collodion that is equal, if not better, in sensitivity and density of negative compared to any previously published types; all without reducing its shelf life or the quality of half tones that their product is known for.
Apparatus, pure Chemicals, and all the requirements for the practice of Photography. Instruction in the Art.
Equipment, pure chemicals, and everything needed for practicing photography. Lessons in the art.
PHOTOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION.—An EXHIBITION of PICTURES, by the most celebrated French, Italian, and English Photographers, embracing Views of the principal Countries and Cities of Europe, is now OPEN. Admission 6d. A Portrait taken by MR. TALBOT'S Patent Process, One Guinea; Three extra Copies for 10s.
PHOTOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION.—An EXHIBITION of PICTURES by the most famous French, Italian, and English photographers, featuring views of the major countries and cities of Europe, is now OPEN. Admission is 6d. A portrait taken using MR. TALBOT'S patent process costs One Guinea; three additional copies for 10s.
PHOTOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION, 168. NEW BOND STREET.
PHOTOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION, 168. NEW BOND STREET.
PHOTOGRAPHIC PAPER.—Negative and Positive Papers of Whatman's, Turner's, Sanford's, and Canson Frères' make. Waxed-Paper for Le Gray's Process. Iodized and Sensitive Paper for every kind of Photography.
PHOTOGRAPHIC PAPER.—Negative and Positive Papers from Whatman's, Turner's, Sanford's, and Canson Frères. Waxed Paper for Le Gray's Process. Iodized and Sensitive Paper for all types of Photography.
Sold by JOHN SANFORD, Photographic Stationer, Aldine Chambers, 13. Paternoster Row, London.
Sold by JOHN SANFORD, Photo Stationer, Aldine Chambers, 13 Paternoster Row, London.
PHOTOGRAPHIC APPARATUS, MATERIALS, and PURE CHEMICAL PREPARATIONS.
PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT, SUPPLIES, and PURE CHEMICAL FORMULATIONS.
KNIGHT & SONS' Illustrated Catalogue, containing Description and Price of the best forms of Cameras and other Apparatus. Voightlander and Son's Lenses for Portraits and Views, together with the various Materials, and pure Chemical Preparations required in practising the Photographic Art. Forwarded free on receipt of Six Postage Stamps.
KNIGHT & SONS' Illustrated Catalogue features descriptions and prices of the best types of cameras and other equipment. It includes Voightlander and Son's lenses for portraits and landscapes, along with various materials and pure chemical preparations needed for practicing photography. Send in six postage stamps, and we’ll send it to you for free.
Instructions given in every branch of the Art.
Instructions given in every area of the Art.
An extensive Collection of Stereoscopic and other Photographic Specimens.
An extensive collection of stereoscopic and other photographic specimens.
GEORGE KNIGHT & SONS, Foster Lane, London.
GEORGE KNIGHT & SONS, Foster Lane, London.
DAGUERREOTYPE MATERIALS.—Plates, Cases. Passepartoutes. Best and Cheapest. To be had in great variety at
DAGUERREOTYPE MATERIALS.—Plates, Cases, Passepartouts. Best and Cheapest. Available in a wide range at
McMILLAN'S Wholesale Depot, 132. Fleet Street.
McMILLAN'S Wholesale Depot, 132 Fleet Street.
Price List Gratis.
Free Price List.
HEAL AND SON'S EIDER DOWN QUILTS are made in three Varieties—the BORDERED QUILT, the PLAIN QUILT, and the DUVET. The Bordered Quilt is in the usual form of Bed Quilts, and is a most elegant and luxurious article. The Plain Quilt is smaller, and useful as an extra covering on the bed, or as a wrapper in the carriage, or on the couch. The Duvet is a loose case filled with Eider Down as in general use on the Continent. Lists of Prices and Sizes sent free by Post, on application to
HEAL AND SON'S EIDER DOWN QUILTS come in three varieties—the BORDERED QUILT, the PLAIN QUILT, and the DUVET. The Bordered Quilt is in the traditional style of bed quilts and is a very elegant and luxurious piece. The Plain Quilt is smaller and serves as an extra layer on the bed, or as a wrap for the carriage or couch. The Duvet is a loose cover filled with Eider Down, commonly used on the Continent. Price lists and sizes are available free by mail upon request to
HEAL & SON'S Bedding Factory,
HEAL & SON'S Bedding Factory,
196. Tottenham Court Road.
Tottenham Court Road.
LEEDS LIBRARY.
Leeds Library.
LIBRARIAN.—Wanted a Gentleman of Literary Attainments, competent to undertake the duty of Librarian in the Leeds Library. The Institution consists of about 500 Proprietary Members, and an Assistant Librarian is employed. The hours of attendance required will be from 10 A.M. to 8 P.M. daily, with an interval of two hours. Salary 120l. a year. Applications, with Certificates of Qualifications, must be sent by letter, post paid, not later then 1st December next, to ABRAHAM HORSFALL, ESQ., Hon. Sec., 9. Park Row, Leeds.
LIBRARIAN.—Looking for a gentleman with literary skills to take on the role of Librarian at the Leeds Library. The organization has around 500 paying members, and there is an Assistant Librarian on staff. The working hours are from 10 AM to 8 Afternoon every day, with a two-hour break. Salary is £120 a year. Applications, along with proof of qualifications, should be sent by letter, postage paid, no later than December 1st to ABRAHAM HORSFALL, ESQ., Hon. Sec., 9 Park Row, Leeds.
THE GENTLEMAN'S MAGAZINE FOR NOVEMBER contains the following articles—1. Sir Walter Raleigh at Sherborne. 2. The Pariah Girl, a Poem: by the Rev. John Mitford. 3. Cotele, and the Edgecumbes of the Olden Time, by Mrs. Bray, Part II. 4. The Annals of Appetite: Soyer's Pantropheon. 5. Notes on Mediæval Art France and Germany, by J. G. Waller: Mayence, Heidelberg, Basle, and Strasburg. 6. Remarks on the White Horse of Saxony and Brunswick, by Stephen Martin Leake, Esq., Garter. 7. The Campaigns of 1793-95 in Flanders and Holland. Correspondence of Sylvanus Urban: Counsels' Fees and Lawyers' Bills; Shops in Westminster Hall; The Family of Phipps; Mr. John Knill of St Ive's; Antiquity of the Mysterious Word "Wheedle." With Notes of the Month; Historical and Miscellaneous Reviews; Reports of the Archæological Societies of Wales, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Wiltshire, Somersetshire, Suffolk, and Essex; Historical Chronicle; and Obituary, including Memoirs of Earl Brownlow, Lord Anderson, Right Hon. Sir Frederick Adam, Adm. Sir Charles Adam, James Dodsley Cuff, Esq., Mr. Adolphus Asher, Leon Jablonski, &c. Price 2s. 6d.
THE GENTLEMAN'S MAGAZINE FOR NOVEMBER includes the following articles—1. Sir Walter Raleigh at Sherborne. 2. The Pariah Girl, a Poem: by Rev. John Mitford. 3. Cotele, and the Edgecumbes of the Olden Time, by Mrs. Bray, Part II. 4. The Annals of Appetite: Soyer's Pantropheon. 5. Notes on Medieval Art in France and Germany, by J. G. Waller: Mayence, Heidelberg, Basle, and Strasburg. 6. Remarks on the White Horse of Saxony and Brunswick, by Stephen Martin Leake, Esq., Garter. 7. The Campaigns of 1793-95 in Flanders and Holland. Correspondence of Sylvanus Urban: Counsel Fees and Lawyers' Bills; Shops in Westminster Hall; The Family of Phipps; Mr. John Knill of St. Ives; Antiquity of the Mysterious Word "Wheedle." With Notes of the Month; Historical and Miscellaneous Reviews; Reports of the Archaeological Societies of Wales, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Wiltshire, Somersetshire, Suffolk, and Essex; Historical Chronicle; and Obit, including Memoirs of Earl Brownlow, Lord Anderson, Right Hon. Sir Frederick Adam, Adm. Sir Charles Adam, James Dodsley Cuff, Esq., Mr. Adolphus Asher, Leon Jablonski, etc. Price 2s. 6d.
NICHOLS & SONS, 25. Parliament Street.
NICHOLS & SONS, 25 Parliament Street.
Will be ready in November,
Ready in November,
TURNER AND GIRTIN'S PICTURESQUE VIEWS SIXTY YEARS SINCE. Edited by THOMAS MILLER, ESQ., Author of "Rural Sketches," &c. With Thirty Engravings of the Olden Time, from Drawings by J. M. W. TURNER and T. GIRTIN, Portraits, &c. Handsomely bound, price One Guinea.
TURNER AND GIRTIN'S PICTURESQUE VIEWS SIXTY YEARS AGO. Edited by THOMAS MILLER, ESQ., Author of "Rural Sketches," etc. With Thirty Engravings from the Past, from Drawings by J. M. W. TURNER and T. GIRTIN, Portraits, etc. Nicely bound, price One Guinea.
HOGARTH, Haymarket, London.
HOGARTH, Haymarket, London.
Fourth Edition of RUINS OF MANY LANDS. NOTICE.—A Fourth and Cheaper Edition, Revised and considerably Enlarged, of MR. MICHELL'S "RUINS OF MANY LANDS," with Portrait, cloth, price 4s. 6d.
Fourth Edition of RUINS OF MANY LANDS. NOTICE.—A Fourth and Cheaper Edition, Revised and significantly Enlarged, of MR. MICHELL'S "RUINS OF MANY LANDS," with Portrait, cloth, price 4s. 6d.
This Edition contains Remarks on Layard's latest Discoveries at Nineveh, and treats of nearly all the Ruins of Interest now in the world.
This edition includes comments on Layard's recent discoveries at Nineveh and covers nearly all the significant ruins in the world today.
London: WILLIAM TEGG & CO.,
London: WILLIAM TEGG & CO.,
85. Queen Street, Cheapside.
85 Queen Street, Cheapside.
TO BOOK COLLECTORS.—Just published. T. MILLARD'S CATALOGUE of 10,000 VOLUMES of SECOND-HAND BOOKS. Catalogues Gratis, and Post Free. N.B. Libraries purchased or exchanged. A discount of 2d. in the 1s. allowed on all new books. Ency. Britt., 7th edit., by Napier, 18 gs.; another, 6th edit., calf, 12 gs.; Ency. Met., last edit., hf. clf., 18 gs.; Penny Cyclo., 29 vols., hf. clf. 7 gs.; Illustrated London News, to end of 1852, cloth, 12 gs.; Stafford Gallery Collection of Pictures, 2 vols. fol., mor. elegant, 5 gs.; Rose's Biographical Dictionary, 12 vols. 8vo. cloth, new, 4l. 8s., &c.—70. Newgate Street, City, London.
TO BOOK COLLECTORS.—Just published. T. MILLARD'S CATALOGUE of 10,000 VOLUMES of SECOND-HAND BOOKS. Catalogues are free and sent by post. N.B. We buy or exchange libraries. A discount of 2d. in the £1 is given on all new books. Ency. Britt., 7th edition, by Napier, £18; another, 6th edition, calf, £12; Ency. Met., latest edition, half calf, £18; Penny Cyclo., 29 volumes, half calf, £7; Illustrated London News, up to the end of 1852, cloth, £12; Stafford Gallery Collection of Pictures, 2 volumes folio, morocco elegant, £5; Rose's Biographical Dictionary, 12 volumes 8vo. cloth, new, £4 8s, etc.—70. Newgate Street, City, London.
TWELFTH PUBLIC DRAWING.—The Fifteenth Purchase of Land having just been made for the CONSERVATIVE LAND SOCIETY, consisting of a Mansion and Part of Seventy-four Acres at St. Margaret's on the Banks of the Thames, opposite Richmond Gardens, close to Three Stations on the South-Western Railroad, it has been resolved that the TWELFTH PUBLIC DRAWING shall take place at Freemason's Hall, at 8 o'clock in the evening, on Thursday, November the 17th, Viscount Ranelagh in the Chair. On this occasion, 131 Shares will be added to the Order of Rights for priority of Selection on the Society Estates, namely, 87 by drawing, and 44 by seniority of date of Membership. All Shares taken prior to the final numbers being placed in the wheel, will be included in this drawing.
TWELFTH PUBLIC DRAWING.—The Fifteenth Purchase of Land has just been made for the CONSERVATIVE LAND SOCIETY, which includes a mansion and part of seventy-four acres at St. Margaret's on the banks of the Thames, across from Richmond Gardens, and close to three stations on the South-Western Railway. It has been decided that the TWELFTH PUBLIC DRAWING will take place at Freemason's Hall at 8 PM on Thursday, November 17th, with Viscount Ranelagh presiding. On this occasion, 131 shares will be added to the order of rights for priority of selection on the society estates—specifically, 87 by drawing and 44 by seniority of membership date. All shares purchased before the final numbers are placed in the wheel will be included in this drawing.
CHARLES LEWIS GRUNEISEN,
CHARLES LEWIS GRUNEISEN,
Secretary.
Admin assistant.
INDIGESTION, CONSTIPATION, NERVOUSNESS, &c.—BARRY, DU BARRY & CO.'S HEALTH-RESTORING FOOD for INVALIDS and INFANTS.
INDIGESTION, CONSTIPATION, NERVOUSNESS, etc.—BARRY, DU BARRY & CO.'S HEALTH-RESTORING FOOD for INVALIDS and INFANTS.
THE REVALENTA ARABICA FOOD, the only natural, pleasant, and effectual remedy (without medicine, purging, inconvenience, or expense, as it saves fifty times its cost in other remedies) for nervous, stomachic, intestinal, liver and bilious complaints, however deeply rooted, dyspepsia (indigestion), habitual constipation, diarrhœa, acidity, heartburn, flatulency, oppression, distension, palpitation, eruption of the skin, rheumatism, gout, dropsy, sickness at the stomach during pregnancy, at sea, and under all other circumstances, debility in the aged as well as infants, fits, spasms, cramps, paralysis, &c.
THE REVALENTA ARABICA FOOD, the only natural, pleasant, and effective remedy (without medication, purging, hassle, or high costs, as it saves fifty times its price compared to other remedies) for nervous, stomach, intestinal, liver, and bile-related issues, no matter how severe, indigestion, chronic constipation, diarrhea, acidity, heartburn, gas, discomfort, bloating, palpitations, skin rashes, rheumatism, gout, swelling, nausea during pregnancy, at sea, and in all other situations, weakness in both the elderly and infants, seizures, spasms, cramps, paralysis, etc.
A few out of 50,000 Cures:—
A few out of 50,000 Cures:—
Cure, No. 71, of dyspepsia; from the Right Hon. the Lord Stuart de Decies:—"I have derived considerable benefits from your Revalenta Arabica Food, and consider it due to yourselves and the public to authorise the publication of these lines.—Stuart de Decies."
Cure No. 71 for dyspepsia; from the Right Honorable Lord Stuart de Decies:—"I've experienced considerable benefits from your Revalenta Arabica Food, and I think it’s essential for both you and the public to share these lines.—Stuart de Decies."
Cure, No. 49,832:—"Fifty years' indescribable agony from dyspepsia, nervousness, asthma, cough, constipation, flatulency, spasms, sickness at the stomach, and vomitings have been removed by Du Barry's excellent food.—Maria Jolly, Wortham Ling, near Diss, Norfolk."
Cure, No. 49,832:—"After dealing with severe indigestion, anxiety, asthma, cough, constipation, bloating, cramps, nausea, and vomiting for fifty years, I found relief with Du Barry's incredible food.—Maria Jolly, Wortham Ling, near Diss, Norfolk."
Cure, No. 180:—"Twenty-five years' nervousness, constipation, indigestion, and debility, from which I had suffered great misery, and which no medicine could remove or relieve, have been effectually cured by Du Barry's food in a very short time.—W. R. Reeves, Pool Anthony, Tiverton."
Cure, No. 180:—"After dealing with anxiety, constipation, indigestion, and weakness for twenty-five years, which caused me a lot of distress and nothing seemed to help, I've been completely cured by Du Barry's food in a very short time.—W. R. Reeves, Pool Anthony, Tiverton."
Cure, No. 4,208:—"Eight years' dyspepsia, nervousness, debility, with cramps, spasms, and nausea, for which my servant had consulted the advice of many, have been effectually removed by Du Barry's delicious food in a very short time. I shall be happy to answer any inquiries.—Rev. John W. Flavell, Ridlington Rectory, Norfolk."
Cure, No. 4,208:—"After eight years of indigestion, anxiety, fatigue, and problems like cramps, spasms, and nausea, my servant looked for advice from various sources, but all those issues were quickly fixed by Du Barry's tasty food. I'm happy to answer any questions.—Rev. John W. Flavell, Ridlington Rectory, Norfolk."
Dr. Wurzer's Testimonial.
Dr. Wurzer's Review.
"This light and pleasant Farina is one of the most excellent, nourishing, and restorative remedies, and supersedes, in many cases, all kinds of medicines. It is particularly useful in confined habit of body, as also diarrhœa, bowel complaints, affections of the kidneys and bladder, such as stone or gravel; inflammatory irritation and cramp of the urethra, cramp of the kidneys and bladder, strictures, and hemorrhoids. This really invaluable remedy is employed with the most satisfactory result, not only in bronchial and pulmonary complaints, where irritation and pain are to be removed, but also in pulmonary and bronchial consumption, in which it counteracts effectually the troublesome cough; and I am enabled with perfect truth to express the conviction that Du Barry's Revalenta Arabica is adapted to the cure of incipient hectic complaints and consumption.
"This light and pleasant Farina is among the best nourishing and restorative remedies, often substituting for various medications. It's especially beneficial for those who suffer from constipation, as well as diarrhea, bowel issues, and kidney and bladder problems, such as stones or gravel; it also alleviates painful irritation and cramps in the urethra, and kidney and bladder spasms, strictures, and hemorrhoids. This genuinely priceless remedy is effectively used not only for bronchial and lung issues, where irritation and pain need relief, but also in cases of lung and bronchial tuberculosis, where it significantly reduces the troublesome cough. I can confidently state that Du Barry's Revalenta Arabica is effective for treating the early stages of feverish illnesses and tuberculosis."
"Dr. Rud Wurzer.
"Counsel of Medicine, and practical M.D. in Bonn.""Dr. Rud Wurzer.
"Councilor of Medicine and practicing M.D. in Bonn."
London Agents:—Fortnum, Mason & Co., 182. Piccadilly, purveyors to Her Majesty the Queen; Hedges & Butler, 155. Regent Street; and through all respectable grocers, chemists, and medicine venders. In canisters, suitably packed for all climates, and with full instructions, 1lb. 2s. 9d.; 2lb. 4s. 6d.; 5lb. 11s.; 12lb. 22s.; super-refined, 5lb. 22s.; 10lb. 33s. The 10lb. and 12lb. carriage free, on receipt of Post-office order.—Barry, Du Barry Co., 77. Regent Street, London.
London Agents:—Fortnum, Mason & Co., 182 Piccadilly, purveyors to Her Majesty the Queen; Hedges & Butler, 155 Regent Street; and through all reputable grocers, chemists, and medicine vendors. Available in canisters, properly packed for all climates, with complete instructions: 1 lb. 29d.; 2 lb. 46d.; 5 lb. 110d.; 12 lb. 220d.; super-refined, 5 lb. 220d.; 10 lb. 330d.. The 10 lb. and 12 lb. are carriage free upon receipt of a Post Office order.—Barry, Du Barry Co., 77 Regent Street, London.
Important Caution.—Many invalids having been seriously injured by spurious imitations under closely similar names, such as Ervalenta, Arabaca, and others, the public will do well to see that each canister bears the name Barry, Du Barry & Co., 77. Regent Street, London, in full, without which none is genuine.
Important Warning.—Many people with health issues have been seriously harmed by fake imitations that have very similar names, like Ervalenta, Arabaca, and others. The public should make sure that each canister has the full name Barry, Du Barry & Co., 77. Regent Street, London, without which none is genuine.
WESTERN LIFE ASSURANCE AND ANNUITY SOCIETY.
3. PARLIAMENT STREET, LONDON.
3. Parliament St, London.
Founded A.D. 1842.
Founded 1842.
Directors.
Directors.
H. E. Bicknell, Esq.
H.E. Bicknell, Esq.
T. S. Cocks, Jun. Esq., M. P.
T. S. Cocks, Jr., Esq., M.P.
G. H. Drew, Esq.
G. H. Drew, Esq.
W. Evans, Esq.
W. Evans, Esq.
W. Freeman, Esq.
W. Freeman, Esq.
F. Fuller, Esq.
F. Fuller, Attorney.
J. H. Goodhart, Esq.
J. H. Goodhart, Esq.
T. Grissell, Esq.
T. Grissell, Esq.
J. Hunt, Esq.
J. Hunt, Esq.
J. A. Lethbridge, Esq.
J. A. Lethbridge, Esq.
E. Lucas, Esq.
E. Lucas, Attorney at Law
J. Lys Seager, Esq.
J. Lys Seager, Attorney at Law
J. B. White, Esq.
J.B. White, Esq.
J. Carter Wood, Esq.
J. Carter Wood, Attorney
Trustees.—W. Whateley, Esq., Q.C.; George Drew, Esq., T. Grissell, Esq.
Trustees.—W. Whateley, Esq., Q.C.; George Drew, Esq., T. Grissell, Esq.
Physician.—William Rich. Basham, M.D.
Doctor.—William Rich. Basham, M.D.
Bankers.—Messrs. Cocks, Biddulph, and Co., Charing Cross.
Bankers.—Messrs. Cocks, Biddulph, and Co., Charing Cross.
VALUABLE PRIVILEGE.
VALUABLE BENEFIT.
POLICIES effected in this Office do not become void through temporary difficulty in paying a Premium, as permission is given upon application to suspend the payment at interest, according to the conditions detailed in the Prospectus.
POLICIES established in this Office do not become invalid due to a temporary difficulty in paying a Premium, as permission is granted upon request to pause the payment with interest, following the conditions outlined in the Prospectus.
Specimens of Rates of Premium for Assuring 100l., with a Share in three-fourths of the Profits:—
Specimens of Premium Rates for Insuring £100, with a Share in Three-Quarters of the Profits:—
Age Age |
£ £ |
s. s. |
d. d. |
17 17 |
1 1 |
14 14 |
4 4 |
22 22 |
1 1 |
18 18 |
8 8 |
27 27 |
2 2 |
4 4 |
5 5 |
32 32 |
2 2 |
10 10 |
8 8 |
37 37 |
2 2 |
18 18 |
6 6 |
42 42 |
3 3 |
8 8 |
2 2 |
ARTHUR SCRATCHLEY, M.A., F.R.A.S., Actuary.
ARTHUR SCRATCHLEY, M.A., F.R.A.S., Actuary.
Now ready, price 10s. 6d., Second Edition, with material additions. INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT and EMIGRATION: being a TREATISE ON BENEFIT BUILDING SOCIETIES, and on the General Principles of Land Investment, exemplified in the Cases of Freehold Land Societies, Building Companies, &c. With a Mathematical Appendix on Compound Interest and Life Assurance. By ARTHUR SCRATCHLEY, M.A., Actuary to the Western Life Assurance Society, 3. Parliament Street, London.
Now available for 10s. 6d., Second Edition, with additional material. INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT and EMIGRATION: a TREATISE ON BENEFIT BUILDING SOCIETIES, and on the General Principles of Land Investment, illustrated through the Cases of Freehold Land Societies, Building Companies, etc. Including a Mathematical Appendix on Compound Interest and Life Assurance. By ARTHUR SCRATCHLEY, M.A., Actuary to the Western Life Assurance Society, 3. Parliament Street, London.
Solicitors' & General Life Assurance Society.
Solicitors' & General Life Assurance Society.
52. CHANCERY LANE, LONDON.
52 Chancery Lane, London.
Subscribed capital, ONE MILLION.
Subscribed capital, $1,000,000.
THIS SOCIETY PRESENTS THE FOLLOWING ADVANTAGES:
THIS SOCIETY OFFERS THE FOLLOWING BENEFITS:
The Security of a Subscribed Capital of ONE MILLION.
The Security of a Subscribed Capital of ONE MILLION.
Exemption of the Assured from all Liability.
Exemption of the Insured from all Liability.
Premiums affording particular advantages to Young Lives.
Premiums providing specific benefits to Young Lives.
Participating and Non-Participating Premiums.
Participating and Non-Participating Premiums.
In the former EIGHTY PER CENT. or FOUR-FIFTHS of the Profits are divided amongst the Assured Triennially, either by way of addition to the sum assured, or in diminution of Premium, at their option.
In the past, EIGHTY PER CENT. or FOUR-FIFTHS of the profits are divided among the policyholders every three years, either as an addition to the amount guaranteed or as a reduction in premiums, based on their preference.
No deduction is made from the four-fifths of the profits for Interest on Capital, for a Guarantee Fund, or on any other account.
No deductions are taken from the four-fifths of the profits for interest on capital, for a guarantee fund, or for any other reason.
POLICIES FREE OF STAMP DUTY and INDISPUTABLE, except in case of fraud.
POLICIES WITHOUT STAMP DUTY and UNDENIABLE, except in cases of fraud.
At the General Meeting, on the 31st May last, A BONUS was declared of nearly Two Per Cent. per annum on the amount assured, or at the rate of from THIRTY to upwards of SIXTY per cent. on the Premiums paid.
At the General Meeting on May 31st, a BONUS was declared of nearly Two Percentage. per year on the amount assured, or at a rate ranging from THIRTY to over SIXTY percent on the Premiums paid.
POLICIES share in the Profits, even if ONE PREMIUM ONLY has been paid.
POLICIES share in the profits, even if only one premium has been paid.
Next DIVISION OF PROFITS in 1856.
Next DIVISION OF PROFITS in 1856.
The Directors meet on Thursdays at 2 o'clock. Assurances may be effected by applying on any other day, between the hours of 10 and 4, at the Office of the Society. where prospectuses and all other requisite information can be obtained.
The Directors meet on Thursdays at 2 PM. You can apply for assurances on any other day between 10 AM and 4 PM at the Society's Office, where you can also get prospectuses and all the other necessary information.
CHARLES JOHN GILL, Secretary.
CHARLES JOHN GILL, Secretary.
ACHILLES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,—25. CANNON STREET, CITY.—The Advantages offered by this Society are Security, Economy, and lower Rates of Premium than most other Offices.
ACHILLES LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,—25 CANNON STREET, CITY.—This Society offers advantages like Security, Affordability, and lower Premium Rates than most other Companies.
No charge is made for Policy Stamps or Medical Fees. Policies indisputable.
No fees are charged for Policy Stamps or Medical Fees. Policies are indisputable.
Loans granted to Policy-holders.
Loans granted to policyholders.
For the convenience of the Working Classes, Policies are issued as low as 20l., at the same Rates of Premium as larger Policies.
For the convenience of the working class, policies are issued for as low as 20l., at the same premium rates as larger policies.
Prospectuses and full particulars may be obtained on application to
Prospectuses and complete details can be requested by reaching out to
HUGH B. TAPLIN, Secretary.
Hugh B. Taplin, Secretary.
BANK OF DEPOSIT.
Deposit Bank.
7. St. Martin's Place, Trafalgar Square, London.
7. St. Martin's Place, Trafalgar Square, London.
PARTIES desirous of INVESTING MONEY are requested to examine the Plan of this Institution, by which a high rate of Interest may be obtained with perfect Security.
PARTIES interested in INVESTING MONEY are encouraged to review the Plan of this Institution, which offers a high rate of interest with complete security.
Interest payable in January and July.
Interest is due in January and July.
PETER MORRISON,
PETER MORRISON
Managing Director.
Managing Director.
Prospectuses free on application.
Prospectuses available upon request.
ALLEN'S ILLUSTRATED CATALOGUE, containing Size, Price, and Description of upwards of 100 articles, consisting of
ALLEN'S ILLUSTRATED CATALOGUE, featuring Size, Price, and Description of over 100 items, consisting of
PORTMANTEAUS, TRAVELLING-BAGS, Ladies' Portmanteaus, DESPATCH-BOXES, WRITING-DESKS, DRESSING-CASES, and other travelling requisites. Gratis on application, or sent free by Post on receipt of Two Stamps.
PORTMANTEAUS, TRAVEL BAGS, Ladies' Portmanteaus, DESPATCH BOXES, WRITING DESKS, DRESSING CASES, and other travel essentials. Free upon request, or sent at no charge by mail upon receiving two stamps.
MESSRS. ALLEN'S registered Despatch-box and Writing-desk, their Travelling-bag with the opening as large as the bag, and the new Portmanteau containing four compartments, are undoubtedly the best articles of the kind ever produced.
MESSRS. ALLEN'S registered despatch box and writing desk, their travel bag with an opening as large as the bag itself, and the new portmanteau with four compartments are definitely the best products of their kind ever made.
J. W. & T. ALLEN, 18. & 22. West Strand.
J. W. & T. ALLEN, 18. & 22. West Strand.
W. H. HART, RECORD AGENT and LEGAL ANTIQUARIAN (who is in the possession of Indices to many of the early Public Records whereby his Inquiries are greatly facilitated) begs to inform Authors and Gentlemen engaged in Antiquarian or Literary Pursuits, that he is prepared to undertake searches among the Public Records, MSS. in the British Museum, Ancient Wills, or other Depositories of a similar Nature, in any Branch of Literature, History, Topography, Genealogy, or the like, and in which he has had considerable experience.
W. H. HART, RECORD AGENT and LEGAL ANTIQUARIAN (who has access to indexes for many of the early Public Records that greatly aid his research) wants to let authors and anyone involved in antiquarian or literary work know that he is ready to conduct searches among Public Records, manuscripts in the British Museum, ancient wills, or other similar archives in any area of literature, history, geography, genealogy, or related fields, where he has significant experience.
1. ALBERT TERRACE, NEW CROSS, HATCHAM, SURREY.
1. ALBERT TERRACE, NEW CROSS, HATCHAM, SURREY.
BENNETT'S MODEL WATCH, as shown at the GREAT EXHIBITION, No. 1. Class X., in Gold and Silver Cases, in five qualities, and adapted to all Climates, may now be had at the MANUFACTORY, 65. CHEAPSIDE. Superior Gold London-made Patent Levers, 17, 15, and 12 guineas. Ditto, in Silver Cases, 8, 6, and 4 guineas. First-rate Geneva Levers, in Gold Cases, 12, 10, and 8 guineas. Ditto, in Silver Cases, 8, 6, and 5 guineas. Superior Lever, with Chronometer Balance, Gold, 27, 23, and 19 guineas. Bennett's Pocket Chronometer, Gold, 50 guineas; Silver, 40 guineas. Every Watch skilfully examined, timed, and its performance guaranteed. Barometers, 2l., 3l., and 4l. Thermometers from 1s. each.
BENNETT'S MODEL WATCH, as featured at the GREAT EXHIBITION, No. 1. Class X., in Gold and Silver Cases, in five options, suitable for all climates, is now available at the MANUFACTORY, 65 CHEAPSIDE. Superior Gold London-made Patent Levers, 17, 15, and 12 guineas. The same, in Silver Cases, 8, 6, and 4 guineas. First-rate Geneva Levers, in Gold Cases, 12, 10, and 8 guineas. The same, in Silver Cases, 8, 6, and 5 guineas. Superior Lever, with Chronometer Balance, Gold, 27, 23, and 19 guineas. Bennett's Pocket Chronometer, Gold, 50 guineas; Silver, 40 guineas. Each Watch is carefully examined, timed, and its performance is guaranteed. Barometers, 2l., 3l., and 4l. Thermometers from 1s. each.
BENNETT, Watch, Clock, and Instrument Maker to the Royal Observatory, the Board of Ordnance, the Admiralty, and the Queen,
BENNETT, Watch, Clock, and Instrument Maker to the Royal Observatory, the Board of Ordnance, the Admiralty, and the Queen,
65. CHEAPSIDE.
65. Cheapside.
ARNOLD'S SECOND HEBREW BOOK.
ARNOLD'S SECOND HEBREW BOOK.
In 12mo., price 9s.
In 12 months, price 9s.
THE SECOND HEBREW BOOK: containing the BOOK of GENESIS, with Syntax, Vocabulary, and Grammatical Commentary. By the late REV. T. K. ARNOLD, M.A., Rector of Lyndon, and formerly Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge; and the REV. H. BROWNE, M.A. Canon of Chichester.
THE SECOND HEBREW BOOK: containing the BOOK of GENESIS, with Syntax, Vocabulary, and Grammatical Commentary. By the late REV. T. K. ARNOLD, M.A., Rector of Lyndon, and formerly Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge; and the REV. H. BROWNE, M.A. Canon of Chichester.
RIVINGTONS, Waterloo Place;
RIVINGTONS, Waterloo Place;
Of whom may be had,
Of whom can be had,
THE FIRST HEBREW BOOK: on the Plan of "Henry's First Latin Book." 7s. 6d.
THE FIRST HEBREW BOOK: based on the format of "Henry's First Latin Book." 7s. 6d.
HERALDIC ILLUSTRATIONS, &c. By A. P. HARRISON.
HERALDIC ILLUSTRATIONS, &c. By A. P. HARRISON.
The following Works illustrative of English History, Genealogy, &c., may be had of the Author and Designer, No. 30. Gilbert Street, Grosvenor Square, at the prices set against the respective works. Copies will be forwarded, Post Free, on Receipt of a Post Office Order for the amount.
The following works that illustrate English history, genealogy, etc., can be obtained from the author and designer at No. 30 Gilbert Street, Grosvenor Square, for the prices listed next to each work. Copies will be sent, postage paid, upon receiving a postal order for the total amount.
I. Roll of Arms granted by Henry III. as Hereditary Bearings to the Nobility. Price, in colours, 1l. 10s. 6d. Emblazoned in gold, 2l. 2s.
I. Roll of Arms granted by Henry III. as Hereditary Bearings to the Nobility. Price, in colors, £1 10s 6d. Emblazoned in gold, £2 2s.
II. Roll of Arms granted by Edward I. as Hereditary Bearings to the Knights Companions at the Siege of Karlaverock, A.D. 1300. Price, in colours, 15s. 6d. Emblazoned in gold, 21s.
II. Roll of Arms granted by Edward I. as Hereditary Bearings to the Knights Companions at the Siege of Karlaverock, C.E. 1300. Price, in colors, 15s. 6d. Emblazoned in gold, 21s.
III. Roll of Arms granted by Richard II. to his Nobility, A.D. 1377. Price, in colours, 4l. 14s. 6d. Emblazoned in gold, 6l. 6s.
III. Coat of Arms granted by Richard II to his Nobility, A.D. 1377. Price, in colors, £4 14s 6d. Emblazoned in gold, £6 6s.
IV. Roll of Arms of all the Knights of the Garter from their Installation Plates at St. George's Chapel, Windsor Castle, &c. Price, in colours, 15l. 15s. Emblazoned in gold, 21l.
IV. Roll of Arms of all the Knights of the Garter from their Installation Plates at St. George's Chapel, Windsor Castle, etc. Price, in colors, £15 15s. Emblazoned in gold, £21
V. Facsimile of Magna Charta, with Arms of the Barons.
V. Facsimile of the Magna Carta, with the Barons' Arms.
VI. Genealogy of Sovereigns of England from Egbert, with their Arms, &c. Price coloured, 21s. Emblazoned in gold, 1l. 11s. 6d.
VI. Genealogy of the Kings of England from Egbert, with their Coat of Arms, Price in color, 21s. Embellished in gold, 1l. 11s. 6d.
VII. Facsimiles of the Warrant for the Execution of Mary Queen of Scots and of King Charles I. Price, on parchment, 2s. 6d. each. On vellum paper, 1s. 6d. each.
VII. Copies of the Warrant for the Execution of Mary Queen of Scots and King Charles I. Price, on parchment, 2s. 6d. each. On vellum paper, 1s. 6d. each.
SCIENCE OF ARCHERY, showing its Affinity to Heraldry, &c. By A. P. HARRISON, Author of "Treatise on the Formation of the English Constitution," &c. 8vo. Price 3s. 6d.
SCIENCE OF ARCHERY, showing its Connection to Heraldry, &c. By A. P. HARRISON, Author of "Treatise on the Formation of the English Constitution," &c. 8vo. Price £3.60.
A. P. HARRISON, 30. Gilbert Street, Grosvenor Square
A. P. HARRISON, 30 Gilbert Street, Grosvenor Square
Price 1½d.
Price 1½d.
CHAMBERS'S EDINBURGH JOURNAL. No. 515. Saturday, Nov. 12, 1853.
CHAMBERS'S EDINBURGH JOURNAL. No. 515. Saturday, Nov. 12, 1853.
Contents:
Table of Contents:
The Sea-side Resorts of the Londoners.
Londoners' Beach Getaways.
A few Jottings about Maps.
A Few Notes on Maps.
Trouble-the-House: A Legend of Livonia.
Trouble-the-House: A Livonia Legend.
Present Aspects of Life Assurance.
Current Aspects of Life Insurance.
Poetry of Trees.
Tree Poetry.
Alligators of the Valley of the Amazon.
Amazon Valley Alligators.
Miscellanea.
Miscellaneous.
W. & R. CHAMBERS, 3. Bride Court Passage, Fleet Street, London; and 339. High Street, Edinburgh. And sold by all Booksellers.
W. & R. CHAMBERS, 3 Bride Court Passage, Fleet Street, London; and 339 High Street, Edinburgh. Available at all bookstores.
TO AUTOGRAPH AND MANUSCRIPT COLLECTORS AND OTHERS.
TO AUTOGRAPH AND MANUSCRIPT COLLECTORS AND OTHERS.
The following Documents and Letters are Missing within the last Twelve Months:—
The following documents and letters have been missing for the past twelve months:—
Letters from Mathew Hutton to the Duke of Somerset, describing the Three Daughters of Lord Winchelsea, enigmatically, as Three Books. Dated August, 1725.
Letters from Mathew Hutton to the Duke of Somerset, describing the Three Daughters of Lord Winchelsea, mysteriously, as Three Books. Dated August 1725.
Letters from Beau Nash as to Ladies C. and H. Finch. Dated August and September, 1725.
Letters from Beau Nash regarding Ladies C. and H. Finch. Dated August and September, 1725.
Letter from W. Edwards to Mathew Hutton. Dated Burly, December 11th, 1725.
Letter from W. Edwards to Mathew Hutton. Dated Burly, December 11, 1725.
Letters containing A Proposal of Marriage from the Duke of Somerset to Lady C. Finch. Dated 1725.
Letters containing a Proposal of Marriage from the Duke of Somerset to Lady C. Finch. Dated 1725.
Letter from the Duke of Somerset to the Earl of Winchelsea on the same subject.
Letter from the Duke of Somerset to the Earl of Winchelsea on the same topic.
Letters between Lord Granville and the Duke of Somerset, as to Titles on the Death of the Duke's Grandson. Dated November and December, 1744.
Letters between Lord Granville and the Duke of Somerset regarding Titles following the Death of the Duke's Grandson. Dated November and December, 1744.
Autograph Notes from George III. to Charles, Earl of Egremont, on Public Business. Dated 1762 and 1763.
Autograph notes from George III to Charles, Earl of Egremont, regarding public business. Dated 1762 and 1763.
Letter of Lord Lyttleton to the Earl of Egremont, inclosing Complimentary Verses to Lady Egremont. Dated January 1st, 1761.
Letter from Lord Lyttleton to the Earl of Egremont, including Complimentary Verses to Lady Egremont. Dated January 1, 1761.
A Particular of the Duchess of Somerset's Debts. Dated October 7th, 1697.
A List of the Duchess of Somerset's Debts. Dated October 7, 1697.
Holograph Letter from Charles II. to the Countess of Northumberland, proposing the Marriage of his son George with her Grand-daughter, the Percy Heiress.
Holograph Letter from Charles II. to the Countess of Northumberland, proposing the marriage of his son George with her granddaughter, the Percy heiress.
Letter from Lord Hertford to his Father, consenting to marry.
Letter from Lord Hertford to his Father, agreeing to get married.
The Commencement of a Letter of Lord Nelson's, &c. &c.
The Beginning of a Letter from Lord Nelson, etc. etc.
Any information relative to the above will be thankfully received and a liberal Reward paid on restoration of the Papers.
Any information related to the above will be greatly appreciated, and a generous reward will be given for the return of the papers.
Apply to MESSRS. RYMER, A. MURRAY, & RYMER, No. 5. Whitehall, London.
Apply to MESSRS. RYMER, A. MURRAY, & RYMER, No. 5. Whitehall, London.
This Day is published,
This Day is released,
A CATALOGUE of a very Choice and Valuable Collection of Books, Ancient and Modern, in the English and Foreign Languages, and Books of Prints, in very fine condition, also some beautifully Illuminated Manuscripts upon Vellum, including a most splendid Vellum MS. of the Latin Bible, in two very large volumes folio, written circa 1380; also a richly Illuminated Copy of Ferdosi's Shah Nameh, in Persian, with Thirty-seven beautiful Paintings:—principally bound by the best Binders, Derome, Bozerian, Kalthoeber, Walther, Lewis, Clarke, Bedford, Riviere, Aitken, &c.: selected from the Libraries of the Rev. Dr. Hawtrey, Provost of Eton; Very Rev. Dr. Butler, Dean of Peterborough, formerly Head Master of Harrow; Right Hon. Warren Hastings, formerly Governor-General of India; Rev. R. J. Coates, Sopworth House, Gloucestershire, collected by him during the last sixty years, with great taste and judgment, regardless of expense; S. Freeman, Esq., Fawley Court (built by Inigo Jones), Henley-on-Thames; John Miller, Esq., of Lincoln's Inn; and various other Libraries sold in London and the Country, with some private purchases. Now on sale at the prices affixed, by
A CATALOGUE of a very select and valuable collection of books, both ancient and modern, in English and foreign languages, as well as prints in excellent condition, and some beautifully illuminated manuscripts on vellum. This includes a magnificent vellum manuscript of the Latin Bible in two large folio volumes, written around 1380, and a richly illuminated edition of Ferdosi's Shah Nameh in Persian, featuring thirty-seven stunning paintings. Most works are bound by top binders such as Derome, Bozerian, Kalthoeber, Walther, Lewis, Clarke, Bedford, Riviere, Aitken, etc. The collection has been chosen from the libraries of Rev. Dr. Hawtrey, Provost of Eton; Very Rev. Dr. Butler, Dean of Peterborough and former Head Master of Harrow; Right Hon. Warren Hastings, former Governor-General of India; Rev. R. J. Coates, Sopworth House, Gloucestershire, who gathered these over the last sixty years with great taste and judgment, regardless of cost; S. Freeman, Esq., Fawley Court (built by Inigo Jones), Henley-on-Thames; John Miller, Esq., of Lincoln's Inn; and various other libraries sold in London and the countryside, along with some private purchases. Now on sale at the listed prices, by
JOSEPH LILLY, 19. King Street, Covent Garden, London.
JOSEPH LILLY, 19 King Street, Covent Garden, London.
This Valuable Catalogue will be forwarded to any gentleman inclosing Two Postage Stamps to prepay it. It may also be seen attached to the "Gentleman's Magazine" for November.
This Valuable Catalogue will be sent to any man who includes two postage stamps to cover the cost. It can also be found with the "Gentleman's Magazine" for November.
*** Such a Catalogue of Rare, Valuable and Choice Books, in fine condition, has not been published for some years.
*** A catalog of rare, valuable, and exceptional books in great condition hasn't been published in several years.
This Day is published, price 8s. 6d.
This Day is published, priced at 8s. 6d.
ΔΕΜΟΣΘΕΝΟΥΣ Ο ΠΕΡΙ ΤΗΣ ΠΑΡΑΠΡΕΣΒΕΙΑΣ ΛΟΓΟΣ.
DEMOSTHENES ON THE EMBASSY SPEECH.
DEMOSTHENES DE FALSA LEGATIONE. By RICHARD SHILLETO, M.A., Trinity College, Cambridge. Second Edition, carefully revised.
DEMOSTHENES DE FALSA LEGATIONE. By RICHARD SHILLETO, M.A., Trinity College, Cambridge. Second Edition, carefully revised.
Cambridge: JOHN DEIGHTON.
Cambridge: John Deighton.
London: GEORGE BELL.
London: GEORGE BELL.
This Day is published. price 5s. 6d.
This Day is published. Price 5s. 6d.
AN ELEMENTARY TREATISE ON PLANE CO-ORDINATE GEOMETRY, By REV. W. SCOTT, M.A., Mathematical Lecturer and Late Fellow of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge.
AN ELEMENTARY TREATISE ON PLANE CO-ORDINATE GEOMETRY, By REV. W. SCOTT, M.A., Math Lecturer and Former Fellow of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge.
Cambridge: JOHN DEIGHTON.
Cambridge: John Deighton.
London: GEORGE BELL, Fleet Street.
London: GEORGE BELL, Fleet St.
Just published, price 1s.
Just published, price £1.
THE STEREOSCOPE,
THE STEREOSCOPE,
Considered in relation to the Philosophy of Binocular Vision. An Essay, by C. MANSFIELD INGLEBY, M.A., of Trinity College, Cambridge.
Considered in relation to the Philosophy of Binocular Vision. An Essay, by C. MANSFIELD INGLEBY, M.A., of Trinity College, Cambridge.
London: WALTON & MABERLEY, Upper Gower Street, and Ivy Lane, Paternoster Row. Cambridge: J. DEIGHTON.
London: WALTON & MABERLEY, Upper Gower Street, and Ivy Lane, Paternoster Row. Cambridge: J. DEIGHTON.
Also, by the same Author, Price 1s.,
Also, by the same author, price 1s.,
REMARKS on some of Sir William Hamilton's Notes on the Works of Dr. Thomas Reid.
REMARKS on some of Sir William Hamilton's Notes on the Works of Dr. Thomas Reid.
"Nothing in my opinion can be more cogent than your refutation of M. Jobert."—Sir W. Hamilton.
"In my opinion, nothing is more convincing than your response to M. Jobert."—Sir W. Hamilton.
London: JOHN W. PARKER, West Strand. Cambridge: E. JOHNSON. Birmingham: H. C. LANGBRIDGE.
London: JOHN W. PARKER, West Strand. Cambridge: E. JOHNSON. Birmingham: H. C. LANGBRIDGE.
Printed by Thomas Clark Shaw, of No. 10. Stonefield Street, in the Parish of St. Mary, Islington, at No. 5. New Street Square, in the Parish of St. Bride, in the City of London; and published by George Bell, of No. 186. Fleet Street, in the Parish of St. Dunstan in the West, in the City of London, Publisher, at No. 186. Fleet Street aforesaid.—Saturday, November 12. 1853.
Printed by Thomas Clark Shaw, at No. 10 Stonefield Street, in the Parish of St. Mary, Islington, at No. 5 New Street Square, in the Parish of St. Bride, in the City of London; and published by George Bell, at No. 186 Fleet Street, in the Parish of St. Dunstan in the West, in the City of London, Publisher, at No. 186 Fleet Street mentioned above.—Saturday, November 12, 1853.
Download ePUB
If you like this ebook, consider a donation!